piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2022-07-13 10:31:10+00:00): ArielRod is the user name. we have a friend in common who tried to facilitate the contact. I'm not sure what stands in the way.
"drainage_divide", I'm using that for the continental divide. the QA tools seem to require it to be a closed area, as in drainage basin. IMO, the QA tools are in error, or the definition of "drainage_divide" is faulty.
georift (2022-07-13 03:30:42+00:00): Thanks, I wondered how to tag this. I kinda felt like the path had right of way? I guess roads are always the priority?
Fizzie-DWG (2022-07-13 03:56:19+00:00): Wouldn't say they're a priority as such, just that they're always mapped before footpaths! I've always worked on crossing=unmarked when you just have a ramp at each side of the street, & crossing=marked when there's any sort of line marking, together with =traffic_signals if the crossing is at lights. Seems to work OK, but as with everything OSM, there's always options!
georift (2022-07-13 05:41:42+00:00): Makes sense, thanks for the context :)
JJIglesias (2022-07-12 07:04:42+00:00): Saludos. Todos los elementos que Creaste NO EXISTEN en la vida real sino son elementos a futuro o en construccion, el Mapa debe reflejar la realidad existente, no items planeados y sin obras, ademas colocaste categorias de vias que NO son acordes con areas residenciales.

Te sugerimos que antes de seguir editando visites learnosm.org

Para NO destruir tu trabajo vamos a cambiar todos esos elementos a "en construccion", podras verlos en el mapa pero NO apareceran en ninguna de las aplicaciones que utilizan el mapa.

Te enviamos un correo directo con varias sugerencias y reglas para editar.

Gracias
JJ
nevw (2022-07-12 09:11:13+00:00): Hi
This edit will not render on OSM because you have not given enough information about what type of business it is. The name alone gives little information.
nevw (2022-07-12 13:24:25+00:00): I expect the gnis:feature_id should be a unique reference number of your listed business
LuxuryCoop (2022-07-12 11:14:45+00:00): 안녕하세요, 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

다름이 아니라 구글 지도에는 저작권이 걸려 있어서 구글 지도를 보면서 작업하시면 나중에 저작권 침해 시비가 걸릴 수 있습니다.
다만 확인 결과 conoscenza23 님께서 추가하신 정보는 위성 사진과 행정안전부 도로명주소 정보만을 바탕으로 알 수 있는 것들이라 지우지는 않았습니다.
타사 지도(구글, 네이버, 카카오 등)의 정보를 오픈스트리트맵에 그대로 베껴올 수가 없다는 점 참고해 주세요.

앞으로도 많은 기여 부탁드립니다!
GEO ECLA (2022-07-13 12:17:28+00:00): "website" : page introuvable et conflit avec "contact:website" déjà saisi
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123503594
aceman444 (2023-04-07 20:40:02+00:00): Zase ziadny zdroj...
Jakka (2022-07-13 06:40:32+00:00): Vermoed dat dit geen uitzichtpunt is ...... zie uitleg ervan. Graag aanpassing indien nodig
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint
eggie (2022-07-12 09:11:55+00:00): Dag Tante jet... Wanneer maxspeed overal 30 is lijkt me dat correct. Het stukje Mozartlaan heb ik weer op residential gezet. Dat hoort in dit geval ook bij de woonwijk.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-24 06:47:23+00:00): Hoi Sven... 
'k Had een klein stukje reedbed aangepast. Nog oude edits van mij.. en een leeg stuk langs de Hoekseweg. 
'k Zie nu dat je er nog recent mee bezig bent.. dus laat de rest maar aan jou over.
Maak je de landuse wel af, want deze wijze van werken triggert andere mappers om landuse weer in te vullen. 

Groet
eggie
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 13:16:10+00:00): Hey, linlin15

注意到您使用的是简体中文编辑器，因此接下来我用简体中文和您沟通。

首先非常感谢您来到OpenStreetMap，但请您注意使用有意义的变更集注释，仅仅”11“不能起到任何作用
其他人无法从这里面看出您做出了什么样的操作

此外，请不要删除其他编辑者的贡献，例如您删除了内环南线周围立交桥，这是非常不礼貌也不合理的。

我将会回退它，望您接下来注意自己的编辑行为，本着于他人合作的目的。
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 15:03:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123692634
user_2066394 (2022-07-15 15:56:31+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
gendy54 (2022-10-07 22:24:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention quand vous cartographiez à ne pas doublonner des objets déjà cartographiés, comme la caserne de pompiers. Dans le cas présent, la caserne est déjà cartographiée sur l'emprise entière et non pas sur un nœud ou un bâtiment. Un objet ne doit être cartographié qu'une seule fois même s'il comporte plusieurs bâtiments ou autre.

Donat, alias gendy54
gendy54 (2022-10-07 22:30:18+00:00): Je viens de voir que c'est le cas sur des bâtiments publics comme le collège et l'école Jules Ferry,  l'EPSMS La Filousière.
Concernant la SEGPA, c'est carrément une erreur de tagguer un bâtiment qui n'existe pas. On ne voit d'ailleurs sur la carte que ca ne colle pas, avec un bâtiment dans un bâtiment et le nom en triplon.
SI vous avez besoin de conseils pour corriger, venez sur forum.openstreetmap.fr par exemple.
eggie (2022-07-12 09:00:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Waarom second_hand=yes?
Ik zal dat  zelf even verwijderen. 
amenity=cafe is van het type Starbucks  .. Is het wellicht een amenity=pub

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-12 09:04:07+00:00): second_hand verwijderd... info samengevoegd met adresnode.
gr eggie
juliusvaart (2022-07-12 09:05:30+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Het is een café dat overdag geopend is. Dus vooral koffie e.d. tevens verkopen ze ook wat spulletjes, maar het is meer een café dan winkel.

Ik denk dat "second_hand" er nog bij stond, heb ik niet goed naar gekeken. Was hiervoor een winkel met tweedehands spullen.

Mvg,

Julius
eggie (2022-07-12 09:14:45+00:00): Klopt Julius,

2de hands kleding. 
Hier zie je de voorgaande tagging.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123506305

Even op het blauwe stipje klikken.

MVG
eggie
user_11609320 (2022-07-12 08:38:22+00:00): the fencing that goes towards crystal geyser is going to be a connector road that is going to be built. can't find the original document that showed it though
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-07-12 10:22:41+00:00): This edit is a sabotage of the UAE borders. The previous state were correct. Please I kindly ask you to check again and revert your actions and don’t do it again.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-07-12 11:08:28+00:00): Hi, iriman, can you explain how was this a "vandalism and unverifiable edits and fixes some problems on territorial borders of Iran"?
I have added relation with boundary=claim, claimed_by, disputed_by, and this can be verified on several sources, but take Wikipedia as an example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_and_Lesser_Tunbs

No change of the Iran border was made.
Can you please revert your edit which removed claimed boundaries?
woodpeck (2022-07-12 11:33:26+00:00): iriman, please explain these edits. I can see in the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123455005 that LockOnGuy cited a number of sources supporting the claim that far from being "clearly Iranian", these islands are indeed subject to a dispute and tagging the boundaries as disputed sounds like the correct solution to me. You have not given any sources for your claim.
Nawfal85 (2022-07-12 11:47:25+00:00): Iriman, your edit is vandalism, revert please.
iriman (2022-07-12 11:50:21+00:00): @Aleksandar Matejevic

Hi Aleksandar, the relation you added is not needed. There are two islands that both have Wikidata. That's enough. I don't map claims specially ones that are not verifiable on the ground.

@Abdullah Abdulrhman, @woopeck

Hi, I know we map verifiable things on OSM and those claims are not verifiable on the ground. Those claims always rejected by Iranian officials.

Regards
iriman (2022-07-12 11:52:29+00:00): * woodpeck
iriman (2022-07-12 12:17:24+00:00): Dear @Nawfal85, 
I guess someone provoked you to comment here. However I may be wrong and of course, there is nothing wrong with commenting. But please ask lockdownguy (if you know him) why he changed the name of the Holy Imam Javad (peace be upon him) to "گواد"
(أعوذ بالله)

History of node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4236952889/history
More detailed:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/92006823/

Note that recently after someone changed the name to "جامع الزهراء" a user deleted it completely.
And yet another user added same place at same location again.
There are a lot of vandalism on Iraq from lockdownguy that I'm going to report to DWG.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-07-12 14:09:13+00:00): @iriman, I agree that both islands have Wikipedia links and if you visit the page you will find out that these are disputed areas. But you still need tagging in order to render this on the map. Imagine you create a point, add a Wikipedia link of the airport, and is that an airport? Will it render on the map? Will the search engine will find it? No, this is why we have other attributes.

Please revert the change for the Thumb islands, it does not affect Iran or UAE borders, it is just a relation that has all the correct attributes for disputed territories, not the administrative ones. 
I understand that this is a sensitive area, but if you look at this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes you will find that lot of territories are in more or less similar situations. This is why we map them as claims, this does not mean that they belong to a specific country.
Nawfal85 (2022-07-12 14:19:57+00:00): No one sent me to comment here. The node you're talking about is non existing in real life. Dont change the subject of this changeset. Revert your vandalism.
iriman (2022-07-13 10:54:36+00:00): @Nawfal85, the main issue there, is insulting. 
Exsistence of a building is not that important.
However, you are right, sorry I had a wrong assumption and went off-topic.
My answer to your comment is the same as my response to others above.
iriman (2022-07-13 10:55:52+00:00): @Aleksandar Matejevic 
OK, you want to map a dispute. I agree with mapping such a thing but it shouldn't use same tags the real boundaries use. For example way 1054903303 that was going through Iran should not have admin_leve=2. It could be disputed:admin_level=2. because in real it is a line passing territory of Iran which itself tagged with admin_level=2 and this is a conflict between those two types of admin_level=*. All tags specific to the dispute should have such a tag (as an example with dispute prefix). So renderers handle them completely separate.

Also, those disputed areas are part of Iran territory on the ground and it is verifiable on the ground, so those disputed areas should only be added to the relation of Iran, if adding to country relations is needed.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-13 12:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123563171 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandal edit by a nationalist user, restore disputed boundaries
iriman (2022-07-13 15:06:24+00:00): @LockOnGuy,
OSM is a map of things that are both real and current. If you think borders are wrong, follow the issue on the ground so it become real and then tell me. I'm here to edit it as reality. Like the issue of "طابو زراعي" that you pointed before.

Representation of a dispute on OSM, should not reflect anything more than the dispute itself.
Also you should note that borders in real world are controlled by governments and Iran has full control over 3 islands.
So you can conclude that the dispute here has had no effect on real boundaries.

About the comment of your recent changeset I should say that I'm not speaking about the degree of my nationalism and I'm interested in edits that interest me.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-13 16:12:50+00:00): iriman,       

If you disagree with the existence of the disputed tag in OSM, you can start here:      
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Delete_proposal         
But if you only disagree with the existence of this disputed area only because of "Those claims always rejected by Iranian officials." that is the whole point of the disputed tag existing. No country will recognize the land they occupied as an occupation land.              

You said it is controlled by Iran who has full control over the 3 Emirati islands, true, and that is why there is a tag called "controlled_by:country" see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054903303               
          
Here in OSM, we always assume good intentions but removing only this feature that is relatable to your country, ignoring the fellow mappers who trying to inform you that what you did is wrong, and with you removing parts of the OSM wiki too:          
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Disputed_territories&type=revision&diff=2355373&oldid=2328779 which was reverted by an OSM Wiki admin telling you that "those claims exist". All of these factors making it hard to continue assuming good intentions.           
     
I have reverted your edit in changeset 123563171. Please read carefully what the others had told you, and what I explained to you and try to understand.     
               
Have a nice day.
iriman (2022-07-13 16:13:45+00:00): To all:
Please let me know your opinions, specially about my last comment to LockOnGuy

Thanks
iriman (2022-07-13 17:26:54+00:00): @LockOnGuy
Yes, removing dispute from the wiki was wrong and I thanked Tigerfell publicly by pressing thank button when I noticed about revert of my edit on wiki and time of pressing button should be available.

For now I would wait if others have comments.

Thanks
literan (2022-07-12 17:30:23+00:00): а разве это не clothes=sports + 
shop=clothes?

или они действительно всякий инвентарь для водного спорта продают (мне казалось, что в основном плавки/купальники)
solenoid jam (2022-07-12 18:49:47+00:00): Можно на сайте посмотреть. Инвентарь и аксессуары в ассортименте.
Warin61 (2022-07-19 02:45:10+00:00): Hi
The relation for Renbo Stoa has only 1 member, it therefore does not need to be a relation. Multipolygon relation roles do not include the role 'building' .. it would be 'outer' in this situation. 
I have deleted the relation and placed the tags on the outer way.
Frans S (2022-08-26 12:32:33+00:00): Hello.  A remark. Sorry to say, but you spend so much time on mapping of farmland, what is not required. Please concentrate on mapping of buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123508675
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
Nzau (2023-05-06 17:02:57+00:00): Salut Charles,

J'ai enfin eu le temps de me rendre sur place et l'accès est pas spécialement fait pour les vélos en fin de compte.
C'est possible mais chiant 😅
Un peu dommage que cette passerelle ne soit pas plus facile d'accès !

Je met "bicycle=yes" sur le chemin que j'ai trouvé, même s'il est plus là pour les PMR à mon avis, si tu pense que "bicycle=permissive" cela me vas également.

Bonne carto !
Carto'Cité (2023-05-15 15:12:55+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,
D'accord ! J'ai modifié pas mal de chemin qui étaient décrits en footway autour de la passerelle au passage.
Par contre je suis dégouté par ce nœud qui crée une jonction entre le pont et la route mais qui pose un gros souci s'il est supprimé pour maintenir les relations des bureaux de vote.
Charles.
Carto'Cité (2023-05-15 15:19:11+00:00): J'ai finalement corrigé le problème de jonction du pont avec la route :)
Charles
Nzau (2023-05-15 19:45:08+00:00): Re Charles,

Super merci !
Et merci également pour la rectif du nœud je ne l'avais pas remarqué.
Nzau (2023-01-02 23:48:54+00:00): Salut Charles,

Il me semble bien que ce chemin ne soit pas fait pour les vélos puisqu'il s'agit d'un escalier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591082632/history 

Et la continuité de cet escalier mène  sur un chemin avec des poteaux et un panneau indiquant que le chemin est prévu pour les piétons uniquement
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591082631/history#map=19/49.20477/-0.37634

Je me permets donc d'enlever le tag bicycle=yes et je retournerais prochainement sur place pour prendre des images
En espérant ne pas me tromper

Bonne journée,
Nzau
Carto'Cité (2023-01-06 18:16:11+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
Merci pour tes corrections. J'ai toute confiance dans tes jugements au regard de la qualité de tes contributions. Et je vois que tu es passé sous JOSM 😀 je ne me souvenais pas que tu avais franchi le pas. Je suis toujours partant pour faire une visio à l'occasion !
Charles
Nzau (2023-01-07 18:08:56+00:00): Merci Charles, je préférais tout de même être sur que cela ne pose pas de problème 😁. Et je m'y suis mis que récemment et c'est vrai que c'est génial une fois quelques plugins installés ! On gagne du temps et on s'amuse encore plus ! Merci de la proposition je te retiens au courant par Telegram pour que l'on se trouve un créneau.
Nzau
eggie (2022-07-12 09:54:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-12 09:59:19+00:00): Beste Iris.. Gebouwen worden in OSM periodiek geïmporteerd incl adresnodes.
Je kunt dat bespoedigen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account.

Wanneer je pdok ortho 2022 als achtergrond zou nemen zie je dat de chalets( ?) net even anders liggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-12 10:04:04+00:00): Maar wellicht even wachten, want het Kadaster heeft nog niets ingemeten 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-12 09:37:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-12 09:43:37+00:00): Op de verbinding naar het fietspad heb ik een note= gezet om te voorkomen dat een andere mapper het weer gaat intekenen op grond van de luchtfoto.
Zou het nu wellicht een fietsverbinding zijn (fietspad?)

MVG
eggie
Jeroen_opsm (2022-07-12 11:49:38+00:00): Dank u wel voor de update!
Aanpassing toegepast in een nieuwe update.
tux67 (2022-07-13 10:52:40+00:00): Hallo Callme112,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Bitte gib beim Upload der Änderungen auch immer die Quelle deiner Änderung an, damit andere Mapper wissen auf welcher Baisis der Change gemacht wurde und zu sehen ob die Quelle der Änderungen zu den OSM Lizenzbestimmungen komtatibel ist. 

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123510526
tux67 (2022-07-13 10:58:13+00:00): Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123510526
SekeRob (2022-07-12 10:20:51+00:00): I know that wiki very well! The housenumber, *if one has one*, with street/zip/city specifically goes on a node at the outer door at the gate or at the internal position on a node if so numbered, in short, where it's signed. Did not bother with the details since it's disused, another ugly concrete structure mapped for completeness. Have not seen housenumber and is likely on the secondary door at the recessed SE corner, but more probably a nohousenumber=yes applies. The main church door is dead centre, top of short wide steps.
pippo6 (2022-07-12 17:26:18+00:00): Thanks for confirming. Steps and secondary entrance added. I think this building has value
- to save the tourist a trip to check the religious services hours (but admittedly, no app I know of displays "disused")
- as orientation point (admittedly, in a seaside town it's not that much of a reference as in a mountain town like Atri, where historical buildings help quite a lot in routing by eye / by memory; but still.)
- historical interest, statistics analyses
西鹿岛 (2022-07-16 11:21:52+00:00): 发生了什么？这里是遭核弹了吗？😅😅😅
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 13:20:18+00:00): linlin15您好
您所作的编辑对于OpenStreetMap是破坏行为

请您务必做到：

1. 不要随意删除其他人已经绘制好的物件，并停止这种破坏行为。OSM是一个反应现实状况的地图。

2. 请使用有意义的变更集注释，这有助于他人了解您正在做什么


---

注意到您是在上一个编辑后2小时进行的本次编辑。这一点都不好玩，只会徒增其他志愿者的工作量，消耗别人的时间，请不要再这样做！
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 15:03:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123692634
vikozo (2022-10-08 08:54:38+00:00): Hallo, this place is Saspul but the name is not showing in the map
tastrax (2022-07-12 11:00:53+00:00): Please change to Bing Imagery as its so much better in Hobart. Lots of these buildings will need to be edited to align them with the best imagery.
CrazyKim117 (2022-07-13 00:04:14+00:00): Hi tastrax,
Sorry to reply late. With your good advise, I re-aligned all buildings and houses that I did with Mopbox satelite. Now, you might find the shape of the houses are not just square anymore. Using a Bing imagery is such a good tool to work for drawing a map. If there are anything wrong while I work, send me a message or leave a comment like this and I will fix them. Cheers, Kim.
tastrax (2022-07-13 00:07:48+00:00): No worries. Have fun mapping. I am also in the process of mapping Lauderdale… good imagery makes it so much easier. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-42.89477/147.49780
CrazyKim117 (2022-07-13 01:15:54+00:00): Your work is nice. If you don't mind, I will contribute your location later like adding addresses into the buildings.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-05 14:36:32+00:00): problem jest taki że to nie jest konkretne biuro a dział uniwersytetu
sejohnson (2022-07-28 12:23:31+00:00): You have incorrectly tagged these features as 'buildings' when in fact, this is farmland. Please edit these and tag them properly as 'farmland', rather than buildings.
*abq* (2022-08-01 18:34:55+00:00): Hier ist dasselbe wie im vorhergehenden Änderungssatz. 
Ist hier eine explizite Beschilderung, die Radfahren erlaubt?
VG Reiner
UdoLaber (2022-08-02 06:21:38+00:00): Hallo Reiner, 

nein, hier ist keine explizite Beschilderung, die Radfahren erlaubt. In diesem Bereich ist der Weg breiter als 2m und somit ist hier das freie Betretungsrecht relevant.
Gruß
Udo
*abq* (2022-08-02 13:03:08+00:00): Hallo Udo,
dann wäre es am besten, die Wegbreite jeweils einzutragen und die access tags *alle* zu löschen, also foot, bicycle und access=no.. Damit bleibt es implizit bei foot und bicycle auf yes. 
Viele Grüße, Reiner
skyper (2022-08-02 20:05:12+00:00): Hey,
+1, für das Anpassen von `width=*` und das Entfernen der access tags.
Ab 2m Breite ist eventuell `highway=track` die besser Alternative, dann höchstwahrscheinlich aber wieder mit ein paar access tag: `vehicle=agricultural;forestry` + `bicycle=yes` (+ `horse=agricultural;forestry)
Viele Grüße,
skyper
*abq* (2022-08-04 13:43:53+00:00): Hallo Udo,
war heute dort. Am unteren Wegende ist ein Verbotsschild für Fahrräder. Die Wegbreite ist 1m. Ich habe alles korrigiert und den access angepasst. 
Bitte schau, dass du access tags so setzst, wie es vor Ort ausgeschildert ist. 
VG Reiner
skyper (2022-08-04 14:24:14+00:00): Hey,
fehlt hier nicht auch noch jeweils ein `bicycle=no`?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837666872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884416600
Fnkok (2022-07-12 13:39:54+00:00): ^_^OSM不是使用火星系的呢，这么喜欢守法建议您不用呢
tux67 (2022-07-13 11:22:19+00:00): Hi,
um hier sicherzugehen, was du machen wolltest:
- Das Schulgelände an sich bleibt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11288520 (da und nur da kommt auch der Name dran)
- nur dieses Gebäude ist keine Schule mehr, die beiden angrenzenden aber schon noch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260802254 (dann wird nicht das name tag verwendet, sondern old_name oder description) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
- dieses Gebäude ist die neue Schule: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929205906 ?

Unter diesen Annahmen hab' ich deine Änderung mal angepasst. 
Feedback bitte hier im CS Kommentar.
Gruß
tux67

-
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123512789