piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mjsir911 (2022-07-23 17:08:23+00:00): Reverted changeset 123786438 which was an accidental publish of uncleaned data
nevw (2022-07-20 04:05:00+00:00): Hi, you dragged a node in the top right of this area…
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123788733&zoom=16&lat=-32.82685&lon=151.84146&layers=B0TTTFT
Are you able to correct this, thanks?
nevw (2022-07-21 02:03:46+00:00): I have put in place the accidentally shifted power pole node.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-30 05:09:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448719291/history

Te plany to w jakikolwiek sposób realne są czy ta linia jest do usunięcia?
BCNorwich (2022-07-19 06:45:47+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The bunkers should be surface=sand, (as per OSM practice), rather than natural=sand as they are not natural features. Please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=golf_course#Features_within_a_golf_course

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2022-07-21 18:32:45+00:00): No response so I've amended the tags.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-29 12:05:07+00:00): 朋友你好，不是很明白为什么一个位于非洲的changeset会被命名为“淮阳区”……
archie (2022-07-19 07:03:23+00:00): Vill du vara vänlig att göra byggnaderna rätvinkliga (markera byggnadens linjer och tryck tangenten "Q"), tack!
seattlefyi (2022-07-19 17:16:40+00:00): Hi again, hope you don't mind the suggestions -- for this pitlatrine toilet facility, would suggest mapping similar to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5804507616) nearby. 1. amenity=toilets (correct) 2. toilets:disposal=pitlatrine 3. Don't add a descriptive name tag like "Restroom" (really for proper names, like "Husky Stadium"). These tags are documented on the OSM wiki. Thanks, and hope you're having fun editing! Takes a little while, so keep it up!
nevw (2022-07-19 06:59:27+00:00): Mate, you have dragged a few nodes here   
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123790138   
Let me know if you want me to fix it.
nevw (2022-07-20 00:35:47+00:00): Hi
I decided to revert this to fix the roads, etc.
I retained the jewellery shop.
eggie (2022-07-19 07:09:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.....  Je hebt aan de Piushaven water=lake toegevoegd, maar dat lijkt me niet correct. 

Je edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123790189#map=16/51.5538/5.1010

De wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water

water=harbour?
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-19 10:47:40+00:00): Aangepast naar harbour.. lake verwijderd.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2022-08-01 12:11:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key !. Most buildings still needed to be squared. And do not connect buildings with nodes to each other.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123790386
seattlefyi (2022-07-19 15:18:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! Just a request - when removing a closed business, please just remove individual tags (specific to the business) and not the entire node, that way we can keep the valid address for the next tenant! I've already put back the one removed here, so nothing more needs to be done. Thanks again for the edits, it's helpful!
mjsir911 (2022-07-19 15:49:00+00:00): ty much seattlefyi, will do!
syntex (2022-08-11 07:48:59+00:00): Niepoprawnie kasowałeś znaczniki budynków, poprawiłem
Dawid2849 (2022-08-15 12:10:03+00:00): Co to za paczkomat? InPost?
syntex (2022-08-15 16:53:20+00:00): To ten https://inpost.pl/paczkomat-warszawa-waw566m-przekorna-paczkomaty-mazowieckie
user_5359 (2022-07-20 08:13:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9896774346.
You add a lot of foreign keys (without any known OSM keys)
Destinatio = #N/A
GPS_Accura = 0
House_ID_M = 1
House_No = Building-3D-101
Latitude = 29.1958018
Longitude = 81.5459761
Move_To = Building-3D-101
Problem = 1
Submission = 3994
_GPS_Point = 29.1958018 81.5459761 1444.7508544921875 4.636
__GPS_Po_1 = 4.636
__GPS_Poin = 1444.750854
_index = 968
organizati = 2
photo = 1654072786256.jpg
project_id = 4
site_id = 6500
site_name = New House
What is the license and the meaning of this informations?
user_8655426 (2022-07-19 09:53:59+00:00): 请不要使用来自受版权保护的地图或任何其他专有数据的数据！

著作権のある地図やその他の知的財産権のあるデータを使用しないでください！

Please do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!

Copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ

Why OpenStreetMap?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_OpenStreetMap?
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 06:50:40+00:00): @Mappin' Jack Flash I dunno, why adding traffic lights are also violated copyrights?
user_8655426 (2022-07-20 09:35:26+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your reply.
You seem to have copied the ZENRIN map information to OSM.

Copyright Easter Eggs
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs

You used the GSI Maps in this changeset, but there are no traffic lights on the map. Naturally, we cannot know the name of the traffic light from the GSI Maps.
How did you know the location and name of the traffic light?
https://osmcha.org/changesets/123790897/
Please tell me the source of the traffic light name.

Also, please reply to another changesets. (I have already reported to the DWG about your problematic editing and attitude.)
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15661662
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 12:41:13+00:00): I removed the names, are they ok now?
user_8655426 (2022-07-20 12:47:03+00:00): Does your comment above mean that you copied the data from the ZENRIN map?
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 13:06:23+00:00): Sorry I don't familiar with ZENRIN and I even didn't visit their website, so I even don't know where I copied from.
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 13:07:35+00:00): Or should I use names from MLIT?
user_8655426 (2022-07-20 13:27:17+00:00): Please do not copy internet information to OSM without permission!

Copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ

Why OpenStreetMap?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_OpenStreetMap?
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 13:35:15+00:00): Aren't MLIT's infos already licensed? https://www.mlit.go.jp/link.html

Or this license is also incompatible with OSM?
nyampire (2022-07-21 05:42:53+00:00): Thank you for replying!

Unfortunately, MLIT ToU (this is based on Japanese Open Government license) does not have compatibility with OSM (ODbL). At least, it is not confirmed.

And I guess MLIT does not have the dataset for the name of the traffic lights. Those are under the control of the police, AFAIK.
Do you know where the datasets are?
tlconrd (2022-07-19 07:06:57+00:00): the were building mud houses, but i am not sure if those are for personal residential use or commercial hotel use, so I didn't add them
David Crochet (2022-08-03 08:49:29+00:00): C'est une boite à livre ?
canfe (2022-07-20 16:59:22+00:00): Va messa l'accessibilità se prevista per legge non per le condizioni.
Per quello ci son tag apposta per hiking, MTB e così via.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123791454
Leo Slager (2022-07-20 08:46:35+00:00): Dag byckel,
Door het verwijderen van de wegen en die opnieuw intekenen heb je niet alleen de geschiedenis van die wegen verwijderd maar ook de routerelaties die daar lopen beschadigd.
Alle wijzigingen die je voor ogen had, zou je ook hebben kunnen aanbrengen zonder de wegen te verwijderen.
De beschadigde routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
byckel (2022-07-20 15:39:40+00:00): Het zou fijn zijn als je je iets voorzichtiger uitdrukt. Je analyse is namelijk niet correct: ik heb de wegen niet verwijderd en opnieuw ingetekend, ik zou niet weten waarom ik die moeite zou nemen. Ik heb ze wel gecombineerd en daarbij die busroute over het hoofd gezien (die had ik ook niet verwacht op die plek achter de slagbomen, een instinkertje). Waarvoor excuses. Dank voor het herstellen van de routerelatie.
Leo Slager (2022-07-20 17:51:38+00:00): Ah, dat is de interpretatie van achavi.
Die vertaalt het samenvoegen van 2 wegen naar het verwijderen van de een en het wijzigen van de geometrie van de ander.
Samenvoegen van wegen is over het algemeen niet aan te raden. De wegen zijn immers in het verleden met reden gesplitst !
Overigens is mijn commentaar nooit kwaad bedoeld. Maar wel bedoeld ter leeringh ende vermaeck.
Als dat anders overkomt, mijn excuses.
byckel (2022-07-22 06:54:34+00:00): Ook hier weer: jij vindt dat het niet is aan te raden. Dat mag, ieder zijn mening, maar doe niet alsof dat een algemene waarheid is. Dataconsistentie en inperking van bestandsgroottes zijn voor mij duidelijke voordelen. Wat is volgens jou het (letterlijk) splijtende argument om objecten die gewoon in elkaar doorlopen en dezelfde tags en relaties bevatten toch over meer dan 1 object te verdelen?
Leo Slager (2022-07-23 11:39:16+00:00): Een routerelatie die die weg halverwege verlaat lijkt mij een prima argument. :-)
En vergeet niet dat de editor iD een  routerelatie altijd gebroken achterlaat. :-(
byckel (2022-07-25 06:08:37+00:00): Helaas is dat totaal niet een antwoord op de vraag die ik stelde.
archie (2022-07-19 07:27:54+00:00): Tack! Placeringen är perfekt! Bra justering.
Andre68 (2022-07-19 20:09:31+00:00): Hi asibwene,
please, please, LEARN, that coastlines have very special rules!
If you continue to ignore them I will be forced to count your edits as vandalism!
David Crochet (2022-08-03 08:49:49+00:00): C'est une boite à livre ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-19 22:34:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
Dave Venables (2022-07-19 09:14:45+00:00): The Cinema closed more than a year ago. old_name should not be enough to trigger the addition of all the brand tags
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
user_8655426 (2022-07-19 09:54:24+00:00): 请不要使用来自受版权保护的地图或任何其他专有数据的数据！

著作権のある地図やその他の知的財産権のあるデータを使用しないでください！

Please do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!

Copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ

Why OpenStreetMap?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_OpenStreetMap?
nyampire (2022-07-20 01:51:54+00:00): Hi, Yueying-8520.
Thank you for editing OSM! But it seems you had ignored the mentions by the community members repeatedly.

Could you suspend your edits for a whole, and reply to the mentions?

Copyright violation is critical to the project, so you have to clarify if it does not fringe it.
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 06:51:10+00:00): OK I reverted
user_8655426 (2022-07-21 11:15:40+00:00): Hello, nyampire様
Thank you for your comment!

駅ビルではなくホテルの中にJRの支社があったので「怪しい」と感じたのですが、やはり不正な編集だったようです。
"reverted due to copyright problems"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123835052
JR東日本の支社を多数追加したようですが、それらの編集も怪しいと思っています。
emersonveenstra (2022-07-23 13:54:02+00:00): Hi,

Please don't add `layer` tags unless a feature is actually above another one. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680451666 you added a layer tag unecessarily
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
user_5359 (2022-07-19 10:35:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9896866368. You add a lot of street lamps with a typo:
Condition = Not Functional
name = Street ight
(See the missing l in the name value). But a name is not a description! A street lamp ist marked as highway=street_lamp (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp). For the non-operational status (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:operational_status) you can use also simple lit=no.
Glassman (2023-02-03 23:32:14+00:00): Could you review this edit - it looks like you created a duplicate of the Methow River that was added a few months before you added yours.

I stumbled across this edit when looking at a new user changing the name of a road.
Adam Schneider (2023-02-03 23:44:50+00:00): Oops. I see what happened: I imported a bunch of tributaries of the Methow River from NHD data into my editor, but then forgot to remove the river itself before uploading. (Fortunately, it looks like I properly connected the new streams to the old river.)
Glassman (2023-02-04 00:40:36+00:00): It's easy to do - I've imported a bunch of streams - it can be difficult at times.
somix (2022-07-19 09:04:03+00:00): Hello, please write the house name in the addr:housename tag, not in the name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
ivanbranco (2022-07-24 13:09:25+00:00): Ciao Franco,

qualcosa è andato storto col copia incolla del wikimedia commons qua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517973413/history
bkil (2022-08-06 19:38:16+00:00): Üdvözlet az OSM közösségében! Szeretném felhívni a figyelmet, hogy érdemes a címkék értékkészletének követnie a wiki és a taginfo alapján megfigyelhető konszenzust, ami a brit angolt javasolja. Eszerint a surface=föld helyett a surface=ground lehet egy alternatíva. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/British_English
RicoElectrico (2022-07-19 19:12:09+00:00): Cześć, access=yes na terenie wojskowym wygląda dziwnie. Tak miało być? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9896941808/
Laxentis (2022-07-19 20:16:47+00:00): Właśnie nad tym się najdłużej zastanawiałem wstawiając tego AED (czy access=private czy jednak nie). Ogółem defibrylator jest w puszce, którą może otworzyć każdy (pod alarmem). Sam obiekt (budynek LAW) jest otwarty 24/7, ale z racji położenia na terenie JW wstęp jest możliwy jedynie dla osób posiadających wstęp na teren jednostki.
user_8655426 (2022-07-19 09:53:39+00:00): 请不要使用来自受版权保护的地图或任何其他专有数据的数据！

著作権のある地図やその他の知的財産権のあるデータを使用しないでください！

Please do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!

Copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ

Why OpenStreetMap?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_OpenStreetMap?
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 06:46:24+00:00): OK I reverted
pio2_122 (2022-07-19 12:39:15+00:00): Po raz kolejny mapowanie niezgodne z prawdą. Ten teren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079702113 - nie jest w całości objęty robotami budowlanymi. Widać to na zdjęciach Sentinel-2 z 17.07.2022.

Tym razem naprawiłem to, ale przy kolejnych tego typu przypadkach będę wycofywał takie zmiany w całości.
Frans S (2022-09-13 14:18:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
All These mappings will be reverted and need to be mapped all over again.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123796158
Frans S (2022-08-30 12:54:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Your mappings include multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped individually.
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123796312
Supaplex (2022-10-14 16:17:56+00:00): Hi

想詢問金烈大道名稱的來源，是否有公開的文獻?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123796404
chiahua (2022-10-18 07:02:07+00:00): 你好，我是在金門縣政府的公開圖資裡看見的。 https://urban.kinmen.gov.tw/kmgis/publicweb/index.aspx
Supaplex (2022-10-18 07:54:04+00:00): 感謝 chiahua

其他圖客已經找到這份，確認過道路名稱移除後加回去了
abakus_uploader (2022-07-19 22:34:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Pol Dellaiera (2022-08-10 16:44:49+00:00): Hello,
Pourquoi ce changement?
Pourquoi supprimer ces informations?
Merci
Tbj (2022-08-11 05:13:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Les informations surabondantes correspondent au nœud Coiffeur :
addr:housenumber et addr:street sont déjà indiquées sur le building ; ce qui fait que cette double localisation crée une erreur "building in building" dans josm.
Tbj (2022-08-11 05:17:41+00:00): Pour le chemin, j'ai ajouté : layer=-1 ; sinon il y a une erreur de type "croisement way et building" (on aurait aussi pu mettre le building en layer=+1 et laisser le passage en layer=0)
Cordialement.
Pol Dellaiera (2022-07-20 03:45:57+00:00): Sorry pour tes ces problèmes d'uniformisation, je ferai attention la prochaine fois !

C'est l'éditeur iD qui me propose ce nom là, du coup, je l'utilise.

Merci en tout cas de les corriger.
Tbj (2022-07-20 05:08:42+00:00): Il n'y a pas de problème. Ce n'est pas toujours évident de trouver le nom exact : cela pourrait aussi être Grand'Place ; mais dans ce cas, il faut les changer tous.
J'ai un cas similaire avec rue/chemin du Mont Saint-Roch et Mont Saint-Roch…
Raphii (2022-07-20 13:18:04+00:00): Super dass dies verbessert wurde.
Weiter So!
◪ Jarv (2022-07-19 20:41:28+00:00): Hi IronVeil,

Please ensure that if you are marking a road as prohibited for pedestrians, that there is actually a restriction on pedestrians. The vast majority of roads do not prohibit pedestrians, although they may be unsuitable for pedestrians. High Speed Dual Carriageways like the A27 may be unsuitable for pedestrians, but they still have a legal right to use them. Routers that use OSM data will however see that the road is marked as trunk, with a speed limit of 70mph and no pavement, and will avoid them for any significant distances.
michalgy (2022-07-19 09:48:05+00:00): Zmienione również ilości kondygnacji w budynkach na osiedlach Przy Arce i Jagiellońkim.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-19 22:34:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
syntex (2022-07-22 14:10:09+00:00): Czy mógłbyś dokładniej opisywać swoje zestawy zmian? "aktualizacja" to zdecydowanie za mało
eggie (2022-07-19 10:43:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.. De contruction van het gebouw heb ik verwijderd.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community