piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tonyf1 (2023-04-09 00:29:45+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. Your contributions are valued. On my survey Stream #1082819926 does not exist, Stream #46916657 connects to Stream #351996864 via the culvert. Stream #1082821754 nor its upstream tributaries does not exist, it is a depression but water never flows down it. Do you have any further information to back up your changes?
Poltroon (2023-04-09 05:32:28+00:00): I was more interested in the tracks than the creeks. I marked creek crossings but did not walk the actual creeks.  May be some debate about whether an intermittent stream is really a watercourse of just a depression. I would have used the Parks Victoria map to decide that. I've zapped all my GPS traces from that time, and your survey soulds much more thoro' than mine, so please override my updates as you like.
tonyf1 (2023-04-09 06:49:13+00:00): Thanks. Re intermittent I don't remember a definition but if it only flows during and immediately after a thunderstorm its a depression. If it flows for a few days I guess its a stream. We can't use the Parks map but I'd be very surprised if they showed. I'll restore them to previous state. If you disagree then please reply.
OddlyAngled (2022-08-01 21:29:31+00:00): I know there are campsites in the vicinity but they’re almost certainly not named Test, can you fix this?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124329185
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ualios (2022-12-20 16:59:05+00:00): Ciao szydzio, puoi verificare il senso unico? c'è conflitto con la relazione di svolta alla rotonda:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201806445
szydzio (2022-12-20 17:30:16+00:00): Hi! Indeed , there was a service street & parking missing from where the one-way street begins. Fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130299981 . Ciao!
ovruni (2022-08-01 20:30:33+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado un nombre anterior y ademas se ha agregado otro con una abreviación que es "Av.", lo cual es desaconsejado. Saludos
Aleksandar1994 (2022-08-02 06:30:57+00:00): Hola! Gracias por señalar esto, su contribución es muy valiosa.
Saludos
Aleksandar
sheldonelectric (2023-01-25 14:43:21+00:00): "Los gatos" is not name:en nor name:fr, it's a spanish name. If in doubt, simply tag as "name".
Furthermore, if you see it's already on the map, you don't need to create a duplicate.
SekeRob (2022-09-27 10:19:29+00:00): Hi,

If you remember, please add the type of fire hydrant (e.g. pillar) and the colour. 1 is tagged red, the other has none.

ciao

PS, exact position to the nanosecond I'd not worry about. They'll be found when the fire is on but I'd not be surprised if nearer the steps you mapped.
pippo6 (2022-11-19 16:11:32+00:00): Hey, many thanks for fixing them.
ralley (2022-08-02 20:36:54+00:00): Thanks for the edits.  One thing, please use ITU format for phone numbers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage  I've corrected this one.
gscholz (2022-08-05 06:18:23+00:00): Hi GribskovForest,
you recent edits in Yarumal have created several errors in the OSM database regarding unconnected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.41545&lat=6.96090&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124332624

As you may know, not connected ways cannot be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GribskovForest (2022-08-05 22:37:07+00:00): Hello gscholz, thank you for pointing this out! As mentioned on my other changeset, I have resolved all disconnected and overlapping ways in this area. Happy mapping!
MrMoehritz (2022-12-19 11:28:45+00:00): Hi Georalf, danke fürs updaten der Hausnummer!
mueschel (2022-08-19 08:43:12+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'corpuss' here. Should that be part of the addr:housenumber?
eggie (2022-08-01 11:47:28+00:00): Beste Pter Geef svp aan wat je aanpassingen zijn in OSM. Medemappers stellen dat op prijs. 
MVG
eggie
MrMoehritz (2022-12-19 11:34:34+00:00): Hi Georalf,

du hast auch hier "review_requested" angegeben, deshalb hier min Kommentar:

Sind dies tatsächlich zwei Gebäude oder eine Doppelhaushläfte? In dem Fall wäre es besser die Wände zu vereinigen und den Tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dsemidetached_house verwenden.

Achte auch darauf Gebäude quadratisch zu machen.

Hast du noch mehr infos, wie es hier in der Umgebung jetzt aussieht (z.b. gibt es den eingezeichneten Fußweg noch?)


Lieben Gruß
Mo
Richard (2022-08-04 09:31:09+00:00): You have changed a bridleway (implies foot, horse and bicycle access rights) to a track (does not imply access rights). This will break foot, horse and bike routing. Please revert this change.
Swihail (2022-08-05 12:47:40+00:00): My apologies. I will review the resources and will not make the same mistake again.
*abq* (2022-08-22 14:34:44+00:00): Hallo Nicolas,
du hast auf verschiedenen Wegen bicycle=no gesetzt. Solange dies nicht explizit so ausgeschildert ist, sondern nur aufgrund des Landeswaldgesetzes getan wurde, sollte dies entsprechend vermerkt werden (Beachtung der on the ground Regel).
Eine Möglichkeit ist 
source:bicycle=LWaldG BW, width < 2m
Bitte vermerke dies bei den von dir geänderten Wegen.

VG Reiner
gscholz (2022-08-05 06:18:20+00:00): Hi GribskovForest,
you recent edits in Yarumal have created several errors in the OSM database regarding unconnected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.41545&lat=6.96090&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124333303

As you may know, not connected ways cannot be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GribskovForest (2022-08-05 22:32:46+00:00): Hello gscholz, thank you for pointing this out! I have resolved all disconnected and overlapping ways in this area. Happy mapping!
gscholz (2022-08-06 06:54:36+00:00): Hi GribskovForest,
thanks for your quick response.
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
muralito (2022-08-01 12:52:57+00:00): Olá. No OSM você deve adicionar apenas um elemento turism=hotel por hotel (você coloca todos os dados no polígono ou no nó, mas não em ambos)
user_6110846 (2022-08-01 09:22:39+00:00): обична переработка  тіпа ти такий правильний і не робиш помилок 
 мовчи і не манди
ququruzka (2022-08-01 21:04:33+00:00): Вітаю , мапере !
До чого відноситься Ваш коментар ?
user_6110846 (2022-08-02 04:28:35+00:00): раджу тобі припинити писати висери і писати по суті 

це добре що ти на Донбасі російське улица Советская перекладаєш українською вулиця Совєтська
ququruzka (2022-08-02 07:20:42+00:00): Шановний, будьте ввічливими. 
Ще раз задаю питання - до якої зміни ваш коментар?
user_6110846 (2022-08-02 07:46:02+00:00): fixed names. no more 'ы' #cleanukr

це ж твій коментар д о твоєї правки якою ти виправляв відсутність пробілів  уназві вулиць
ququruzka (2022-08-02 07:49:32+00:00): і ? що далі ? я залишаю такі коментарі дуже часто
gscholz (2022-08-05 06:18:18+00:00): Hi GribskovForest,
you recent edits in Yarumal have created several errors in the OSM database regarding unconnected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.41545&lat=6.96090&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124333783

As you may know, not connected ways cannot be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GribskovForest (2022-08-05 22:34:47+00:00): Hello gscholz, thank you for pointing this out! As mentioned on my other changeset, I have resolved all disconnected and overlapping ways in this area. Happy mapping!
dmfr (2024-06-19 20:32:08+00:00): Olá! Relativamente à "Levada N.º 2" (way 1082869014 e outras à volta), podes confirmar se se trata efetivamente de uma levada em funcionamento? Ou seja, se se trata de um canal de transporte de água para fins agrícolas com utilização ativa?
Maplander (2024-06-20 07:33:15+00:00): 
 Caro dmfr,
cumprimentos.
Já percorri a Levada N.º 1 e parte dela está funcional e aproveitada.
Por sua vez a parte da Levada N. 2, sul da Avenida Doutor António Fonseca, também já percorri e parte dela, embora ainda bem definida, não está funcional nem utilizada.
Por conseguinte, o troço a norte Avenida Doutor António Fonseca, que se desenvolve num núcleo urbano já muito denso, presumo que também não esteja funcional nem utilizada desde logo porque a montante não está funcional, carecendo de limpeza e manutenção. Terá por isso já troços inutilizados e seguramente não funcionais porque não abastecidos a partir do Caima. 

At.te
dmfr (2024-06-20 11:23:35+00:00): Obrigado pela resposta!

Por se tratarem de estruturas artificiais, seria melhor tagar com waterway=canal em vez de waterway=stream.

Quanto às secções não-funcionais, julgo que seria melhor dividir a levada em várias ways, e as secções que estiverem desativadas tagar com disused:waterway=canal. Se te lembrares ainda que partes não funcionam, era bom se conseguisses fazer isso.
DanDanDan (2022-08-01 21:17:33+00:00): Hi! Der Prozessionsweg ist zu lang. Wie wäre es, auch noch das fehlende Stück der Kolpingstraße zu ergänzen? Dann den Prozessionsweg auch nur bis zur Kreuzung mit der Kolpingstraße führen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124334106
DanDanDan (2022-08-01 21:20:05+00:00): Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124334106
ckemmer (2022-08-02 16:17:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe versucht, das jetzt zu korrigieren.
DanDanDan (2022-08-04 12:01:02+00:00): Sieht gut aus. Danke.
utvonalfelmeresek (2022-08-01 12:52:09+00:00): Köszi, nyugodtan menj Újtelep felé, Én Északon építkezek egyelőre :)
jb54osm (2022-08-01 10:48:58+00:00): Dag Peter,

In de wiki staat het volgende over room=shop.
Avoid using the following common values, they add no information and can cause confusion.
...
room=shop 	A shop, use shop=* instead. 

Wil je er nog even naar kijken?
kaktus67 (2022-08-28 12:07:36+00:00): Der Fussweg bei der Heldelinger Strasse ist m.E. eher ein Gehsteig und kein ausgewiesener Fussweg. Denn ein Fussweg wäre von der Strasse getrennt, ein Gehsteig nicht. Der Weg für Fussgänger liegt aber direkt an der Strasse an. D.h. man müsste die Heldelinger Strasse mit dem Tag "sidewalk=left" versehen und den Fussweg löschen.
kaktus67 (2022-08-28 12:09:23+00:00): Nebenbei, freut mich auch mal mit einem OSMler aus der Region zu diskutieren. Da bekommt man neue Ein- und Aussichten.
johsin18 (2022-08-29 16:09:23+00:00): Ebenso :-)
Ich muss dir rechtgeben mit dem Sidewalk.  Zur Zeit wird die Heldelinger Straße allerdings hier neu gemacht, und der Durchgang ist nur für Fußgänger möglich.  Ich versuche das zu ändern, ohne das Fußgänger-Routing kaputt zu machen.
kaktus67 (2022-08-30 05:11:33+00:00): Die Heldelinger Strasse wird glaube ich schon seit 4 Jahren "neu" gemacht. Eine ewige Baustelle... ;-)
Wegen sidewalk oder footway: Da gibt es dafür und dagegen, das wird hier schön diskutiert: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig
Ich bevorzuge im Fall der Heldelinger Strasse Variante A, da der Gehsteig eben direkt an der Strasse anliegt. Variante B hat m.E. zu viele Nachteile.
Beste Grüsse, Michael
starsep (2023-03-07 18:26:34+00:00): Czy nie pomyliłeś GW z MW?
Nequit (2023-03-08 07:49:27+00:00): Pomyliłem, przed chwilą poprawiłem moc na właściwą.
legofahrrad (2022-08-01 09:54:45+00:00): Hey! ;)
Bitte die Farbwerte auf englisch, bzw. die CSS Farbnamen verwenden.
Statt "blau" dann "blue": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9924308677

Viele Grüße!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour
eggie (2022-08-01 11:45:49+00:00): Beste Peter  Zou je svp de moeite wille nemen je edits te omschrijven bij een upload.
room=office is volgens mij geen valide tag.
wel bv office= company

Wat is Lichtpuntjes van mariahoeve voor eem bedrijf.
Wellicht shop= ??

MVG
eggie
DaveF (2022-08-02 11:24:45+00:00): Not much point in updating this road at the moment as the council are digging it up to instal cycle lanes.
skquinn (2022-08-01 18:00:14+00:00): Hi,

In the future when moving a left turn lane to a separate way like this, please check for placement tags that no longer apply. When going from 3 lanes to 4 where the left lane is for left turns only, placement is middle_of:3 so the through lanes line up with the following segment; when this is changed back to 3 lanes that placement tag should be removed.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-08-02 08:30:56+00:00): Hi, skquinn

Thank you for raising this up and removing the tag “placement”. I have updated the Lyft OSM team on this case based on your comment. So now, when changing the geometry and fixing lanes count, we will always check the tag “placement”. I apologize for any inconvenience these edits may have caused. Thank you for your contribution!

Best regards,
Yuliya
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124335355
aTarom (2023-06-03 09:19:22+00:00): Please, take into account the language of the place and how the surrounding streets are named. "Carrer..." not "Calle ..."
If you have any questions about this, please contact the local community at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
Cheers
MaryiaKuklis1111 (2023-06-05 06:10:39+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your note! Will be more careful in the future!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124335398
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 09:45:28+00:00): Угорське "gy" транслітерується в "дь". Краще попереносити просто в name:hu. А потім хтось інший додасть назву
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 09:46:48+00:00): Тут краще було перекласти на "Велика гора"
literan (2022-08-01 18:50:39+00:00): а поставили тег чисто велосипедной, по которой пешком запрещено

а какая же там дорожка на самом деле?
neo-plan (2022-08-01 20:08:33+00:00): Велопешеходная. Сдвоенный круглый знак.
literan (2022-08-03 16:28:28+00:00): может быть с разделенным движением или совмещенным

https://www.vozhdenie-nn.ru/law/dorozhnye-znaki/predpisyvajushhie-znaki/peshehodnaya-i-velosipednaya-dorozhka-s-razdeleniem-dvizheniya

это с разделенным. Поставлю такой:

bicycle=designated
foot=designated
highway=path
segregated=yes

не спрашивайте, почему такой набор тегов, просто вот он такой )
osmviborg (2022-08-01 09:58:02+00:00): Hertil: https://www.laesoe.dk/kommunen/nyhedsarkiv/nye-kunstvaerker-i-oesterby-havn
AE35 (2022-08-01 10:03:15+00:00): Super reseach - Håber nogen med kendskab til Læsø Havn kan placere kunstværket nu.
bxl-forever (2022-08-01 17:32:36+00:00): WARNING: you broke cycle routing here.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-08-01 10:01:16+00:00): Changed tags from highway=construction to highway=tertiary according to local user's request. #mbx_usa_editing
archie (2022-08-01 10:37:38+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denna changeset. Problemet med den var att du satte beskrivande namn på det mesta. OSM är en databas för geografiska objekt, inte en digital karta. Name-tagen får inte innehålla beskrivande namn som "Garage", "Parkering" m m. När det gäller namn på byggnader så är det så att gamla byggnader har "namn" t ex "Villa Solfid" etc. 
Du bör läsa i wikin till osm om namn och vad som gäller. Men som sagt det är inte via name-taggen som objekt i osm-databasen defineras. OSM är ingen karta utan en databas för geografiska objekt.
archie (2022-08-01 10:59:51+00:00): Här är länken till wikin avseende hur name-taggen används (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names).
Ännu en gång OSM är en databas inte en karta bara i digital form. 
Det som du taggade som "Garage" skall vara taggad som "building=garage", men inte med det beskrivande namn "Garage". 
Och det som du namnade som "Parkering" är redan taggad som "amenity=parking". 
Det går inte heller att använda name-taggen för att beskriva vilken verksamhet som pågår i byggnaden. Sålunda ej "name=Köket".
Av dessa exempel tror jag att du förstår att en byggnad bara skall ha en name-tagg om den verkligen har ett namn (vilket inte är så ofta).
Szymson (2022-08-01 14:36:25+00:00): Kolego ogarnij się z tym prostowaniem, bo to co robisz niczemu dobremu nie służy
r2d (2022-08-02 07:54:39+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

Quelques remarques sur vos modifications :
 - L'attribut name est réservé pour le nom des objets, il ne faut pas s'en servir pour ajouter une description. Pour cela il y a l'attribut description (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:description).
 - Si le chemin est peu ou pas marqué mais qu'il reste empruntable, il est préférable d'utiliser le tag trail_visibility avec comme valeur bad ou no, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:trail_visibility
 - Si le chemin n'est plus utilisable, il est possible d'utiliser les attributs de cycle de vie en préfixant par exemple la clé par abandoned: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Pr%C3%A9fixe_cycle_de_vie). Le chemin ne sera alors plus visible sur la plupart des rendu, mais par exemple OsmAnd les affiche.

Comme je vois que vous cartographiez principalement des sentiers, je vous invite à regarder aussi la clé sac_scale qui permet de renseigner la difficulté d'un sentier.

N’hésitez pas si vous avez des questions. Bonne journée,

Nicolas
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-02 19:34:25+00:00): Hvad er bicycle=des ?
på 1082909500 
og hvorfor er det access=no?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-02 17:45:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14409961

Er en park som er en relation som består af to andre parker. Der giver ikke rigtig mening.
zorglubu (2022-08-29 16:55:38+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai une remarque et une question sur ce nœud.
1) La remarque est qu'un nom est à écrire de manière générale avec une casse mixte (première lettre de chaque mot en majuscule), et en mettant les accents s'il y en a.
voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Abr%C3%A9viation_(%C3%A0_ne_pas_faire)
On écrit par exemple Sncf et non pas SNCF.
2) La question concerne l'étiquette office=property_developer
Cette étiquette est utilisée 61 fois dans le monde dont 59 en France, créées essentiellement pas vous. Ne pensez-vous pas que office=property_management, utilisé 1669 fois dans le monde,et documenté dans le wiki, serait plus approprié ?
Cordialement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2022-08-30 07:04:17+00:00): Bonjour, 

Effectivement j'ai bien pris en compte vos remarques et j'ai effectué les modifications nécessaires.

Bonne journée,
alexashh (2022-08-03 08:59:16+00:00): Все здания с номером ш? Что-то пошло не так в правке
alexashh (2022-08-03 08:59:36+00:00): уверен что это ошибочная правка
Piz Pachific (2022-09-16 09:28:11+00:00): Reverted in 126255604. Please discuss first in community.
bxl-forever (2022-08-01 17:18:07+00:00): Hello,

We had to re-do your edit because it was full of mistakes: you mistook the garage for the clinic itself, the tags were wrong, you used wrong separators, the opening hours were invalid…  I feel sorry for your customer who paid you to get an online presence and who got such a poor service in return.

Just one more thing: spamming changeset titles with lengthy descriptions of what your customers are doing… is just pointless and won’t help your rankings because those changeset titles are not visible outside of OSM mappers.  You might consider using your time more wisely.
BCNorwich (2022-08-01 13:37:45+00:00): Hi, I've tweaked the tags a bit. It would be good if the actual site could be mapped. Need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Brighthouse Farm Caravan and Campsite (2022-08-01 14:09:17+00:00): Hi Bernard, i dont mind admitting but im clueless and lost so if you don't mind helping that would be great? We are open all year , 365 days a year. Yes it would be good to outline the actual site but atleast we have a pin. See we also run B&B and have self catering alongside the caravan and camping site. We find this works well if we have campers who have friends / family who dont like camping then they can stay in our rooms. I was hoping by getting us on here we could also be on https://opencampingmap.org - do you know anything about that site and how it works? We had a couple from the Netherlands stay with us last week who also mentioned a site called maps.me do you know anything about that one? Sorry for all the questions. Many thanks Ross
BCNorwich (2022-08-02 08:16:30+00:00): I've sent an email via OSM so we can continue the conversation.
Rodrigo Rega (2022-08-01 19:11:12+00:00): Hola, Levi: Bienvenido a OpenStreetMap. En esta edición he visto que se añadió por duplicado el Boletus. He procedido a eliminarlo para que solo quede uno. Gracias por tus ediciones. Un saludo!
DD1GJ (2022-08-01 13:48:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925251468

Das ist ein Teil der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12528471

Du kannst das fixme wieder entfernen.
Romwriter (2022-08-20 16:24:48+00:00): fixme entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125154319
osmee333 (2022-08-01 16:40:28+00:00): Thank you, and apologies  again. Take care!
julcnx (2022-08-01 14:28:40+00:00): hi nitinatsangsit, I believe you made those edits based on the DRR data. Unfortunately, some drawings are wrong, and segments like 478967119, 327173183, 202506151 in Samoeng are actually offroad tracks/paths unsuitable for normal cars. Maybe it was the agency's initial plan to go this way and never happened, or simply a data mistake. Let me know if I should revert these classifications. cheers, julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124339012
Nithinat S (2022-08-01 15:19:44+00:00): Sorry for the issue with Highway 1396 in Samoeng. That road is weird since it is a national highway with a section that is inaccessible by motor car, which is a rare case. The problem is that I simply want to bring the national highway into compliance with the guidelines, and I assume that the mapped track is usable by a motor car. (I did not change the path section because it is clearly unsuitable for a motor car.)

Perhaps we should divide this problem into two halves. 1) If any section of it is improper for a motor car, change it to path should be the correct way. 2) We probably need more detail in highway classification guidelines, such as an unpaved road should not be higher than tertiary. Do you have any suggestions?

Regards
julcnx (2022-08-01 16:04:32+00:00): I was actually thinking that we should maybe have one rule to downgrade tertiary sections that are mostly unpaved/4wd only. There are quite a few especially near/inside national parks including e.g. Pai to Muang Noi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124339012
Nithinat S (2022-08-01 16:18:36+00:00): For general unpaved road, I think tertiary is acceptable (but not secondary), but for 4wd-only road, maybe not higher than unclassified? or track only?