piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 06:52:50+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121724125
bxl-forever (2022-06-03 15:45:06+00:00): Hello,

I am sure you want to make helpful edits but you are not using the right tags.
Tagging proper cycle infrastructure is a bit tricky and in some of your latest edits such as this one, or Rue Maurice/Mauricestraat, you are actually REMOVING bicycle access.
We suddenly got negative comments about broken itineraries in this area, because of the changes you made.

Here is how OSM data model works:
* oneway=yes means that a street is a one-way street → this applies to all vehicles by default (cars, bicycles)
* oneway:bicycle=no means that cyclists are exempted from the one-way restriction.

Therefore, the typical combination found in Brussels with a white M2 sign ("except for bicycles") translates as "oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no" in OSM.

I see you are putting "oneway:bicycle=yes"… which means the opposite (with oneway:bicycle=yes, cycling is entirely forbidden in the contraflow direction, notwithstanding the cycleway tags you are adding).

I felt I had to tell you.
Lejun (2022-05-31 08:03:24+00:00): Salut, merci de la contribution, je vois que quelques erreurs s’y sont glissées :

– Sur le restaurant Caz’elles, les heures d’ouvertures ne suivent pas le format standard OpenStreetMap[1]. Je te laisse corriger, il faudrait mettre « We-Su 10:00-22:00 » ;
– Tu as déplacé, sûrement par erreur, un feu tricolore[2] et la route qui lui est associée de 400 m. Je l’ai remis en place mais essaie de faire attention la prochaine fois.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7772508407
Ptigrouick (2022-05-31 22:51:00+00:00): Bonjour, il y a également une autre erreur qui a été commise dans ce changeset :

- la borne incendie n°41 a été déplacée à un endroit qui n'est pas le bon. Je l'ai remis à sa place. Attention de ne pas déplacer ces bornes sans une bonne raison.
Lejun (2022-06-01 04:06:55+00:00): Au temps pour moi, j’ai vu la borne incendie et trouvait ça étrange mais sans plus qu’elle soit renseignée de façon indépendante. J’aurais du vérifier.
RHEast (2022-06-01 21:27:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
@Aurelian (2022-05-30 17:13:36+00:00): #GlobalYouthmappers
#Youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter
2022
silversurfer83 (2022-05-30 15:38:10+00:00): Gude
Du hast um ein Review gebeten. Grundsätzlich sieht es gut aus. Darf ich die Änderung so verstehen, dass das Gemeindezentrum aktuell ungenutzt ist und der Parkplatz nicht genutzt werden kann?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121725029
som-tam (2022-05-30 18:06:42+00:00): Meine Änderung bezieht sich auf den Kommentar eines Users "kein öffentlicher Parkplat, Gelände ist abgesperrt"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2861824#map=17/51.36570/9.47682&layers=N
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121725029
som-tam (2022-05-30 18:07:52+00:00): Und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2861822
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121725029
silversurfer83 (2022-05-31 00:16:15+00:00): Ja wenn das so ist, dann sehen deine Änderungen ziemlich gut aus. Schön, dass du beim Gemeindezentrum ein lifecycle prefixe genutzt hast :)
som-tam (2022-05-31 06:17:57+00:00): Klaro. Danke fürs Review.
eggie (2022-05-30 15:42:07+00:00): Probeer plakken aan grensvlakken te voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen... en goed inzoomen. 
Ik heb het pad losgemaakt van de grens en het spoorweggebied
Gr eggie
Ocnus (2022-05-31 08:53:31+00:00): Dank voor de tip!
eggie (2022-05-30 16:00:31+00:00): Dag PA  Hier heb je de node gebruikt van het Groot Handelsgebouw.. Waarom die gegevens verwijderen? 
Waarom niet gewoon de adresnode gebruiken.  Daar staat nu Restaurant Engels op. Bestaat Engels nog wel? 

Graag reactie...
eggie
eggie (2022-05-30 15:39:06+00:00): Het wordt nog wat hier!

name=Wandelpad Spoortuin is dat de officiele straatnaam. Zoniet Dan de name= verwijderen of evt description= gebruiken.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
Ocnus (2022-05-31 08:48:22+00:00): Zal ik doen. Ik probeer de Spoortuin correct in beeld te brengen, daar zijn nogal wat wijzigingen voor nodig. Fijn dat je meekijkt.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Rjian42195 (2023-02-24 08:26:21+00:00): Guten Tag,
warum tauchen jetzt überall die Namen in der Karte auf, die du hier eingefügt hast? Das ist denke ich nicht gewollt und sieht unschön aus!
Kann ich dich da unterstützen? Wie müsste das geändert werden?
Trevor_1 (2022-05-30 19:19:23+00:00): Hi, this changeset covers a very large area across multiple states. In the future, can you try to make your changesets smaller?
MapMapper_ (2022-05-30 21:07:54+00:00): Hello, sure thing! By mistake I started editing in another state but then began editing in north east Florida after I noticed.
Trevor_1 (2022-05-30 23:26:29+00:00): Ok thanks!
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
dgitto (2022-06-01 07:19:40+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2022-06-01 07:24:17+00:00): ho effettuato una piccola correzione. I civici non devono andare sull'oggetto building. Perchè in Italia non c'è corrispondenza tra un edificio e un civico, ovvero un edificio può contenere in generale più civici, anche appartenenti a più vie diverse. Dunque è bene mapparli come punti separati, come è già stato fatto in altri casi in zona.
dgitto (2022-06-01 07:25:15+00:00): E comunque quella è ancora mappata come Via Montale, mentre hai messo il civico indicante via Michelangelo. Dovresti correggere uno dei due.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Syl (2022-06-07 07:55:28+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai  un gros doute sur l'utilisation de amenity=telephone avec access=private vu qu'il doit s'agir par définition d'un téléphone public (ou au moins accessible à la clientèle), n'y aurait-il pas un tag plus adapté ?
Le noeud en question : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2803919926
nlehuby (2022-06-07 08:03:21+00:00): Bonjour, il s'agit bien d'un téléphone non accessible au public, à usage interne SNCF. On en a quelques uns cartographiés avec emergency=phone + access=private dans certaines gares également (mais la pratique majoritaire est de ne pas les cartographier du tout)
Syl (2022-06-07 11:59:45+00:00): Ok, je viens de mettre emergency=phone à la place.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 15:10:24+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121727517
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
MxxCon (2022-05-31 04:28:44+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete valid address tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121727800
BC4FUN (2022-05-31 17:54:56+00:00): I must have done this inadvertently.  I have only precticed adding details.  not deleting details.  My mistake. Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121727800
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
literan (2022-05-30 19:20:17+00:00): а в чем причина удаления кавычек из названий остановок таких как "Метро "Митино""?

Они по правилам русского языка должны писаться в кавычках, да и на аншлагах в кавычках пишутся

new.gramota.ru/spravka/buro/search-answer/?s=названия железнодорожных станций
Grass-snake (2022-05-31 03:55:53+00:00): Видел много станций, где названия написаны без кавычек, хотел привести к единому виду.
literan (2022-05-31 06:04:27+00:00): скорее их надо к правильному виду приводить
Grass-snake (2022-05-31 06:23:42+00:00): Тогда возникают вопросы по единому стандарту:
1. В каких кавычках делать: "обычных" или «ёлочках»
2. с какой буквы писать префиксную часть в начале name?
3. Многие автобусные маршруты тоже содержат названия станций без кавычек в тегах name/from/via/to (я стараюсь так делать), нужно ли там менять?
literan (2022-05-31 09:23:42+00:00): 1. Насколько я знаю, разницы нет.
2. Название остановки - имя собственное. Будь это "Школа", "Малиновка" или "Станция метро "Тушинская"", по правилам русского языка они должны писаться с заглавной. 
3. По логике, названия маршрутов  должны совпадать с названиями остановок, я делал идентично.

Но вообще, можно и в чате обсудить.
ivanbranco (2022-05-30 18:27:15+00:00): Hi Beqa080,

again, please be careful, you dragged a node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9782504126/history
iD even tried to warn you (warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway) but you ignored it.

Also what's the source of the boundary edit?
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 14:23:40+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121728199
Lejun (2022-05-31 09:16:32+00:00): Ça roule, merci de l’info. Histoire que ce soit bien clair, hésite pas à rajouter ce type d’information (contexte et dates) sur l’élément en question avec la clé « note ». Ça facilite la maintenance à défaut d’avoir un outil qui permette de notifier quand est-ce qu’il faut repasser vérifier un élément.
rurseekatze (2022-06-18 12:36:38+00:00): Hallo GPSpoker,

vielen Dank für deine fleißige Mitarbeit!

Eine kleine Ergänzung, die mir noch aufgefallen ist:

Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395941727 hast du sidewalk=no ergänzt, also dass es keinen Bürgersteig gibt. Da es mit dem kombinierten Fuß-/Radweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10274149 aber einen separat erfassten Fußweg gibt, wäre sidewalk=separate passender (je nach Wegrichtung ein sidewalk:left=no + sidewalk:right=separate oder umgekehrt). Da du mit StreetComplete arbeitest, müsstest du entsprechend für die eine Fahrbahnseite die Option "separat auf Karte eingezeichnet" auswählen.

Viele Grüße
rurseekatze
rurseekatze (2022-07-06 20:30:53+00:00): Per PN konstruktiv geklärt, Korrektur in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122556982
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 08:20:08+00:00): Great work, thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121728435
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
highflyer74 (2022-05-31 04:55:59+00:00): Tach!

Da Du "review_requested" angekreuzt hast: mir fiel auf, dass da noch note=* an ein paar Stellen dranhängt, die sich auf die vorherige Baustelle beziehen (z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065227413). Weiß nicht, ob das noch muss / evtl. vergessen wurde.

Schönen Tag Dir!
ABausD (2022-06-19 12:24:51+00:00): Danke das du drauf geschaut hast.
Da der Baustellenbereich wandert, habe ich an einigen Stellen den alten note=* gelassen. An dem verlinkten Way ist er aber nicht mehr nötig. Mach ich weg.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
eggie (2022-05-30 17:10:50+00:00): Hi Fenelon..
Please check before the addressnode. It was already present. I removed your address.
Greetz,
eggie
LockOnGuy (2022-05-31 21:54:33+00:00): This changeset had been reverted fully or in part in changeset 121786223 where the changeset comment was "Revert vandalism in changeset 121639845 restore the disputed areas in the Arabian Gulf region"
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 11:49:34+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121728915
Mathias_ADAV (2022-07-27 08:39:01+00:00): Bonjour Bernard,
En effet, cet te relation est en doublon de l'EV5, c'est en fait la portion qui est en state = proposed, c'est à dire planifié mais pas encore ouverte. L'idée est qu'il apparaissent en pointillé. Lorsque j'ai créé cette relation, je n'ai pas osé supprimer les tronçons correspondant de l'EV5, mais je devrais le faire une bonne fois pour toute.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:54:14+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729180
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:54:18+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729180
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:18:38+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729223
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:14:53+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729267
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 13:16:43+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729323
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 10:25:27+00:00): Great work, thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729481
Carto'Cité (2022-12-14 15:14:34+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
Il semblerait que la commune d’Yvetot considère cet aménagement cyclable.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012006170
Est-ce que tu as observé sur le terrain une interdiction explicite ? Sinon on peut le passer en path. Merci  d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
SColchester (2022-06-01 08:39:35+00:00): These buildings have all been mapped in the middle of an empty field. Please take care when looking for buildings - we're looking for straight edges, shadows and a color difference between the roof and the ground to indicate buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121729577
ivanbranco (2022-05-30 18:15:11+00:00): Hi Valther,

I don't understand why adding the waste disposal node as part of the highway. Is there a reason?
Valther Kviten' (2022-05-30 20:05:38+00:00): Well there's a safety island. Or is it not there? :)
ivanbranco (2022-05-30 20:19:55+00:00): The only safety island I see from aerial imagery is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901254253/history
not on the secondary highway.

Mapping this way seems like the waste disposal is right in the middle of the road. If there's a safety island the road should be splitted in that point. Anyway I doubt someone would put a waste disposal in the island in the middle of the road instead of at one border of it, but if you say so.

Here for example I doubt there's a safety island with a waste disposal in it, in such a narrow street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4212843059/history
LiJu09 (2022-06-01 14:13:06+00:00): Can you provide source of these changes?
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 14:22:23+00:00): Here you have that booking is taking the location from openstreetmap and it is false the hotel is directly in Jasna.

"Set in Demanovska Dolina, 1.9 km from Jasna, Hotel Jasná offers accommodation with a restaurant, free private parking, a bar and a shared lounge. Among the various facilities are ski-to-door access and a ski pass sales point. The property is allergy-free and is situated 8 km from Demanovská Ice Cave.

At the hotel, all rooms are fitted with a desk, a flat-screen TV, a private bathroom, bed linen and towels. Free WiFi is accessible to all guests, while some rooms also offer a balcony. All guest rooms will provide guests with a wardrobe and a kettle.

Guests at Hotel Jasná can enjoy a buffet breakfast.

The accommodation offers a terrace. Guests at Hotel Jasná will be able to enjoy activities in and around Demanovska Dolina, like hiking, skiing and cycling.

The nearest airport is Poprad-Tatry Airport, 65 km from the hotel.
This is our guests' favourite part of Demanovska Dolina, according to independent reviews.

Couples particularly like the location — they rated it 9.7 for a two-person trip.

Hotel Jasná has been welcoming Booking.com guests since 23 Dec 2018.
Distance in property description is calculated using © OpenStreetMap"
Filip009 (2022-06-01 15:58:36+00:00): I think that they use their own gps coordinates for each hotel and they just use roads from OpenStreetMap to calculate the distance. So you didn't help booking, please revert your changeset and give these hotels back to OSM.
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 16:03:06+00:00): No As you can see they are calculating the distance from openstreetmap. you can see it in the description it wasnt there before. The false distance became when someone put the hotel on openstreetmap.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 16:16:35+00:00): Building was changed to hotel in OSM 2 years ago. So maybe booking has changed the coordinates just now?
Dodko (2022-06-02 19:01:51+00:00): Na stránke hotela je uvedená adresa Demänovská Dolina 88
https://www.hoteljasna.sk/sk/kontakt

V katastri súpisné číslo 88 je táto budova
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/810304/2922_4?pos=48.964519,19.585681,18

v OSM je to táto budova
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304515962

Tak to všetko sedí v poriadku, nebol žiaden dôvod vymazať tú budovu, keď tam naozaj stojí a adrese je v poriadku sedí aj s katastrom.
П3тр0виЧъ (2022-06-01 03:24:13+00:00): >>> Хотел ещё спросить, а почему вот здесь natural=wood, а не landuse=forest?

В первом предложении ответ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dforest

>>> Там вроде бы не дикий лес, а вполне себе аккуратненько разбитая лесопосадка.
natural=wood это не «дикий лес», а просто обозначение территории, занятой деревьями.
Для указания, что эти деревья высажены людьми, можно использовать тег wood:origin=man_made
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 15:47:43+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121731610
LiJu09 (2022-06-01 14:13:02+00:00): Can you provide source of these changes?
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 14:24:04+00:00): Here you have that booking is taking the location from openstreetmap and it is false the apartments are directly in Jasna.

"Apartments Kvasničník features mountain views, free WiFi and free private parking, located in Demanovska Dolina, 2.3 km from Jasna.

The apartment offers a flat-screen TV and a private bathroom with a hairdryer, free toiletries and shower. Some units include a seating area and/or a balcony.

Guests at Apartments Kvasničník can enjoy a buffet breakfast.

The accommodation offers a terrace.

Skiing and cycling can be enjoyed nearby, while ski-to-door access and a ski pass sales point are also available on site.

Demanovská Ice Cave is 8 km from Apartments Kvasničník. The nearest airport is Poprad-Tatry, 66 km from the apartment, and the property offers a paid airport shuttle service.
This is our guests' favourite part of Demanovska Dolina, according to independent reviews.

Couples particularly like the location — they rated it 9.6 for a two-person trip.

Apartments Kvasničník has been welcoming Booking.com guests since 18 Feb 2016.
Distance in property description is calculated using © OpenStreetMap"
Filip009 (2022-06-01 16:00:23+00:00): Deleting these hotels is not solution for your problem. Please write to booking, which data they use from OpenStreetMap, but please do not destroy our maps.