piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jurekh78 (2020-10-19 18:31:17+00:00): Hi Eggie, thanks for the pointer. The Wiki mentions it's ok to redraw the shapes based on BAG  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:BAG - is that ok, or should the wiki be updated?
eggie (2020-10-19 18:55:20+00:00): Oke.. no problem for me.. but..... 
In case you draw a new building from BAGdata a duplicate building will imported from the BAG on top of yout building. The reason is there is no BAG data at the buildingshape.
In case you reshape a building from BGT omtrekgericht or BAG data there wil be no problem. The BAG data is still present.
Gr eggie
Stereo (2020-10-19 12:39:14+00:00): Hi again! You can tag the building as building=commercial; that way, it will show up like the others.

Your editor automatically chose the French aerial imagery since you're close to the border; in the layer menu on the right of the screen, you can also choose the Geoportail.lu imagery layers that are often sharper.
oani_network (2020-10-21 17:51:41+00:00): Thank you Stereo for you hint.
Best regards from your OANI team,;-)
Lokai (2021-05-06 08:34:55+00:00): Hallo gerd95,

kannst du die Quelle für die Bezeichnung Ausgleichsfläche benennen. Der Floßbachbegleitwuchs war schon vorher da. Es geht hier wohl um die Grünfläche.

Gruß
W.
gerd95 (2021-05-06 10:49:18+00:00): Hallo Wegabschneider,

Nach 7 Monaten fällt mir das schwer.
Aber ich glaube, da war vor Ort ein Schild.

Wenn’s stört, dann lösche den Namen.
Grüße,
Gerd
Lokai (2021-05-06 12:10:13+00:00): Ok, Ich war gestern dort, morgen verschieb ich’s in die Beschreibung mit Hinweis auf ein Schild und unterscheide in scrub und grass.
evod (2020-10-22 19:59:11+00:00): Ups, stimmt, die Doblhoffgasse bleibt wohl ein Radweg. Aber ob in der Rathausstraße künftig Radfahren erlaubt sein wird?
bxl-forever (2020-12-28 10:44:18+00:00): We have a problem with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634276524
and possibly others.

If you set foot=yes and bicycle=yes, they become routable.
Those tags should not be set while the way is still under construction. ;-)

(highway=construction + construction=* + bicycle=yes is something that can be used for instance when a road is being rebuilt but cyclists may still use it.)
Thierry1030 (2020-12-28 15:51:41+00:00): thx for the comment. I didn't know that a highway in construction could still be routable. I removed therefore the tags bike and foot, and I will add them again when this and the other nearby tunnels will be ready
mavl (2020-10-20 16:15:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
tguen (2020-10-23 05:12:08+00:00): Hi CoolChitin. It looks like you're trying to use multipolygons to connect landuse areas with objects inside of the area. Objects are not normally connected this way, and this is not what multipolygons do. Multipolygons are used for creating an area with holes, or tagging multiple areas as a single object. When you add an area (like a building) as an inner member of a multipolygon relation, you are excluding the inner area from the outer area. In some cases this is appropriate (e.g. excluding a lake from a wooded area), but in this case a multipolygon should not be used.

Unfortunately the wiki page for multipolygons is a bit messy, but here's a link in case you want to read it anyway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
opendcc (2020-12-25 16:36:38+00:00): Hallo,
 Du hast da einen Weg vom Reitstein zum Kemelkopf eingetragen. Der ist aber nirgends angeschlossen und scheint auch quer über Felsabstürze zu führen. Kannst Du da vielleicht noch nähere Angaben machen?
eggie (2020-10-18 15:41:47+00:00): Dag Lars.. Altijd lastig om een wegklasse te bepalen. Ik heb Julianaplein weer aangepast naar residential.
Het is geen weg over een parkeerterrein.
Dat je dwars op de weg kunt parkeren kun je als tag opnemen in de hoofdrijbaan.
parking:lane:right=perpendicular

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane/Examples

Gaat trouwens prima zo.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-18 15:53:51+00:00): Het Bernhardplein was als woonerf getagd. Daar heb ik ook residential van gemaakt en op de eenrichting de uitzonderingen van tweewielers gezet. 
Mocht er een bord woonerf staan dan zou alles achter het bord ook woonerf moeten zijn.
Het zou zomaar kunnen dat dat bord later is geplaatst? 
Up to you.
Eggie
Larshei (2020-10-18 16:24:30+00:00): Het Bernhardplein is ook een woonerf. Tenminste, er staan woonerf-borden.
eggie (2020-10-18 17:30:57+00:00): Oke... pas je het zelf aan?
..highway=living_street

Gr
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-18 17:39:04+00:00): Het westelijke stuk Bernhardplein heb ik weer omgezet naar living_street.. De rest up to you... of er moet weer een bord einde woonerf staan?
Larshei (2020-10-18 18:11:35+00:00): Volgens mij staat er alleen aan de oostelijke uitgang (de westelijke uitgang mag je niet nemen met de auto) een einde-woonerf-bord.
eggie (2020-10-18 18:22:38+00:00): Yep... een hele uitzoekerij.. gelukkig hoeft Den Helder vandaag niet af. 😀
Mapse
Larshei (2020-10-18 18:31:55+00:00): En ze gaan dit Stadspark vanaf het station tot de dijk doortrekken, dus naast de kaart is Den Helder zelf ook nog niet af ;)
ToniE (2020-10-19 07:25:41+00:00): Salut Jean-Piere,

You've changed  "GR 2" and it now appears as a route=trolleybus, which I think is not correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1959668

Cordiallement
Toni
Axelos (2020-10-26 09:42:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous préciser si la partie non comprise dans la zone créée de la Rue du Chaufour est toujours accessible aux véhicules motorisés, si oui est-elle encore en sens unique ?

J’ai placé votre zone en rue pédestre, ce qui implicitement donne accès aux vélos à l’allure du pas.

Axel.
Stan54 (2020-10-29 16:08:30+00:00): Bonsoir Axelos,
Merci pour les changements, ils sont conformes à la réalité.

Pascal Stan54
mariotomo (2021-09-21 19:08:56+00:00): hey … when you meet such nonsense like "access=no", if it was by cavalli1985, please do remove the label.
Trevor_1 (2021-09-25 14:24:08+00:00): Ok got it. I will
mavl (2020-10-20 06:55:23+00:00): Hello. Google Earth is copyrighted source and you can't use it to improve OpenStreetMap. Your data will be deleted.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
  
Vladimir Marshinin  
Data Working Group
mavl (2020-10-20 16:16:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
piechucki (2020-10-18 15:47:17+00:00): ...Rowerem brak przejazdu!
Rom1 (2020-10-18 20:41:23+00:00): Bonjour, le tag cycleway n'est pas correct voir cet autre groupe de modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91860520 D'après la photo https://twitter.com/Departement54/status/1317107202080071682/photo/1 et le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Chemin_de_halage il s'agirait de highway=service. Merci.
pebogufi (2020-10-19 08:15:17+00:00): Merci de votre renseignement.
J'ai corrigee le V50 entre Charmes et Messein, ou le V50 n'etait plus en construction que Septembre. S'il y a des parts quil faut corrigier tags, vueillez corriger si bon vous semble.
Pour mois il est important que les nouveaux parts du V50 sont utilisable par velo.
Merci.
felipeeugenio (2020-10-18 16:47:40+00:00): estimado. Para usar tag es bueno siempre usar la wiki.
no existe nada que sea = strip center. pero si calza bien shopping_centre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dshopping_centre)

saludos
rodrigovb (2020-10-18 17:10:48+00:00): Ok así lo haré. Estaban como "mall" y me parecía mucho para el lugar.
Gracias
felipeeugenio (2020-10-18 17:18:25+00:00): Ok. Me puse a revisar a nivel nacional y mandé un mensaje en el chat. El uso de mall está mal en muchos casos.
saludos
rodrigovb (2020-10-18 17:26:44+00:00): buenísimo!!!
ACarlotti (2020-10-31 23:27:51+00:00): This change is incorrect. A road can be marked as no-entry at one end without any part of it being oneway. I think it's only oneway if it's marked with a white arrow on a blue rectangular sign at the entrance. In this case there is also a sign on Fitzwilliam Street marking it as explicitly twoway.

Even if the road were oneway to general traffic, the no entry sign has a clear exemption for cyclists, so you would have needed to also tag it oneway:bicycle=no

The no entry restriction is either mapped with short section of oneway tagging at on end (as was already done here), or more accurately by using no_entry turn restrictions. As a general note, the mapping community in Cambridge has done a very good job of mapping twoway roads with no entry restrictions as such, so I think warnings in tools like improveosm are likely to be false positives.

I've reverted this changeset in changeset 93355143. Have you made any other changes like this one?
RobertSpencer (2020-11-06 15:15:28+00:00): Hello (again) ACarlotti and thanks for catching that.  Its important I think to note that this change was prompted by a StreetComplete quest and so reverting it is likely to result it in being reapplied in time as a contributor is prompted as I was.  I'm not sure what the fix is for this, and don't have time to delve into the workings [here](https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/blob/761f28697058adbce7c0a864e2d75f747b234bfb/app/src/main/java/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/quests/oneway_suspects/AddSuspectedOneway.kt) to determine what tags can flag this as "not for questing".

I have not made any other one-way commits.
RobertSpencer (2020-11-06 15:16:10+00:00): Having checked the way, perhaps marking it as actively not one way will suffice?
mueschel (2020-10-20 11:29:03+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag 'open_space = class_3' here. What does it mean?
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:46:48+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Pedja (2021-07-05 19:58:49+00:00): Možete li da proverite ovaj unos. Na ovom mestu ne postoji takav objekat.
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-19 10:00:56+00:00): Building shape may be improved
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92662777
DaveF (2020-10-19 21:29:58+00:00): Hi
You appear ot have created another, duplicate relation. 
Could you take a look please.
amurski (2020-10-20 00:29:11+00:00): no changes to relations appear in the changeset
DaveF (2020-10-20 00:46:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360130571
amurski (2020-10-20 18:15:31+00:00): Oh I see, different changeset. Fixed it. ID editor did something unexpected there.
eggie (2020-10-18 17:40:46+00:00): Tip.. probeer winkels zo veel mogelijk op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen.
gr eggie
karson_ (2020-10-18 17:27:24+00:00): I wouldn't recommend using Bing Imagery. Everything in Iowa City has been aligned to Mapbox Satellite, whereas Bing Imagery is offset and of lower quality.

You can switch which background imagery you are using in iD by pressing the "B" on your keyboard. This should bring up a list of imagery to use, select Mapbox for the highest resolution. National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) is the most up to date if you are trying to add recent construction.
DavidFischer (2020-10-18 17:30:23+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I didn't know that.  I figured I would try and do my part to map the areas around me and contribute to the community.  Thanks for helping out a new editor!
Bert Araali (2021-03-21 21:44:08+00:00): Dear Bakole import. You overwritten a whole area, nicely mapped and even with 3D mapping.  The alignment is incorrect and a lot of items are deleted.  You should not do this without contacting the mappers who mapped here before you first. So sorry I reverted the whole import. Regrads, Bert Araali
Carnildo (2020-10-19 09:22:52+00:00): Are you sure about the routing of Bacon Loop Trail?  When I hiked it about a decade and a half ago, it had just (as in, earlier that week) been re-routed away from Bean Creek, and no longer followed the lines on the topo map.
John Hanover (2020-10-20 21:18:46+00:00): I traced the trails in this area using USFS trail data, most of which looks to have been gathered with GPS. I'm unsure of how recently this data was collected and it is possible the trail has been re-routed since then. The USFS data shows the trail a ways up the slope from where it is shown on the USGS topos, so I think the re-route is covered, but I guess the only way to know for sure is to check it on the ground.
dschneiderch (2021-06-24 22:46:26+00:00): The trail from west side to bacon lake is spot on. i hiked it last summer. where did you get up to date usfs trail data?  When I pull the tile server data from https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_FSTopo_01/MapServer/WMTS/tile/1.0.0/EDW_EDW_TrailNFSPublish_01 it still shows the old trail.
John Hanover (2021-07-01 20:51:00+00:00): I typically use the National Forest System Trails shapefile downloaded from https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation. I then import the file into QGIS and extract small portions of it as GPX files, which i then trace over in JOSM. 

So far this is the best source of data I have found on USFS trails short of tracing them myself. 

It's also worth noting that some forests are better than others at keeping their trail data up to date. Most of the trails data on the Nez Perce-Clearwater NF is still based on the USGS maps.

I hope this was helpful.
Leo Slager (2020-10-19 16:27:45+00:00): Een historische fout bij een poging om de routes voor vrachtauto's > 7,5 ton op de kaart te zetten.
Leo Slager (2020-10-19 16:29:09+00:00): Tegenwoordig zitten die netjes in een relatie opgenomen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8355021
defluyter (2020-10-20 10:46:15+00:00): Dank voor de toelichting Leo!
d3mol3k (2025-01-21 19:32:16+00:00): Przesunąłem planowany odcinek DK10 od CH Ster do Łukasińskiego we właściwe już miejsce.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-25 09:29:40+00:00): Dzięki za poprawienie i migrację do unsigned_ref tam gdzie to było konieczne!
itineris (2021-02-28 09:10:28+00:00): Szia!

A "Dömsöd" változtatáscsomagodban - ami egészen Rácalmásig terjed - egyszintes épületet csináltál a part menti kutakból. Ezzel csak az a gond, hogy a QA eszközök reklamálnak, mert egy épületnek terület típusú elemnek kellene lennie.
Kérlek, javítsd ki őket valami jobb címkézésre! Annál is inkább, mert a szivattyúház nem a teljes bucka (emankment=yes vonal) területét tölti ki, hanem csak a közepét.

Üdv:
Ákos
zsolt d (2021-03-01 08:05:07+00:00): Szia Ákos!

Átnéztem a Csepel-sziget menti vízmű kutakat. A kutakat pont elemmé alakítottam. Ahol építményen/építményben van a kút, azt szétválasztottam külön elemmé. Ahol "bucka" tehát földmű tetején van  kút, ott maradt a motoros, privát kút. Privát jelzés nélkül egyes térképi alkalmazások vízvételi helynek jelölik a túrázók számára. Ha tudsz, kérlek nézz rá, hogy marad-e még épület-kút hibás elemem!
köszönöm
Zsolt
itineris (2021-03-01 08:30:08+00:00): Ezekre gondolok:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=6410&item=1170&class=4

A listából a building=service voltál te, a leányfalui vízbázisnál.
zsolt d (2021-03-01 10:31:38+00:00): Köszönöm, azt a területet is végigellenőrzöm.
zsolt d (2021-03-01 11:02:18+00:00): Dunabogdány, Leányfal, Szentendre déli vízműterület épület vs. vízműkút és töltés javítottam.
itineris (2021-03-01 11:35:32+00:00): Köszönöm.
Hb- (2020-11-07 12:14:32+00:00): Hi, you should not have overwritten the English name "Sanasar" of the town node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1838421422

If there are disputed names please list them all.
AzerAkhundov (2020-11-07 12:52:52+00:00): Hi, it is not disputed, it was under occupation and it was liberated in October. The town is under Azerbaijani control and its official name is Qubadli. Armenians never lived there, they only lived in Nagorno Karabakh area. Qubadli is not Nagorno-Karabakh region.
Hb- (2020-11-07 15:31:03+00:00): Nice to hear from you and I agree with your opinion. 

But the name "Sanasar" needs to be tagged on this town, because the road signs show this name. See https://twitter.com/ghost_watcher1/status/1323733395663368195 and the video mentioned there.

Effectively you deleted valid data from OSM and that is not good.
AzerAkhundov (2020-11-07 15:35:50+00:00): I cannot see the video due to the internet restriction, but as I understood, if the sign is changed the name can be changed on map. OK. Let's wait for a few weeks, soldiers are demolishing old signs and installing new ones. I will inform you when I find a photo of new signs.

By the way, what is the date of the recorded video?
AzerAkhundov (2020-11-07 15:41:53+00:00): I watched the video by using VPN. It is a new video. Soldiers are from Azerbaijan :) I will inform you when the sign is changed.
skquinn (2021-07-23 01:01:16+00:00): Hi,

"sr-ss" isn't valid syntax for opening_hours, "sunrise" and "sunset" must be spelled out. In fact I'm not 100% sure that's what was meant, it's a guess on my part.
VinasCZ (2021-02-20 20:53:23+00:00): Is this road actually closed?
Derek1155 (2021-02-20 21:45:13+00:00): No, where is it marked as closed?
VinasCZ (2021-02-20 21:48:25+00:00): I have noticed the sliproad is tagged with "access=no" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163610576), which marks the road as not accessible by public (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno).
Looking at the history of the road it looks like you might have added the tag by mistake then :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163610576/history
Derek1155 (2021-02-20 21:53:03+00:00): Got you. So allowed access must be yes for all or it marks it as closed. I thought setting motor vehicles to yes would be the only one. Corrected it now. Thanks for pointing out.
VinasCZ (2021-02-20 21:56:39+00:00): Yup, access for "all" set to "no" will mark all access as not allowed. Usually if you are not sure about a tag you can look at the wiki pages, there are good explanations of how to tag different things. 
Thanks for the fix!
philippec (2020-11-17 20:29:33+00:00): aed indoor ?
StijnRR (2020-11-18 17:42:09+00:00): outdoor
syntex (2020-10-29 11:06:38+00:00): These villages are abandoned, you deleted the azeri names from them. Why?
naveenpf (2020-10-19 09:27:44+00:00): ഓപ്പൺസ്ട്രീറ്റ്മാപ്പലേക്ക് സ്വാഗതം
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manojkmohan/diary/394482
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92664644
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:46:19+00:00): source: bustimes.org
ivanbranco (2021-12-23 22:53:35+00:00): Hi happpymapping,

there's a problem with many islets/islands you hadded, can you check it out please?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22place%22%3D%22is%22+global&R
happymapping (2021-12-25 10:36:07+00:00): Hi Ivan, 
Enlighten me what the specific problem is!
ivanbranco (2021-12-25 10:42:51+00:00): Hi,

there's no need anymore, someone else fixed them two hours after I commented your changeset, such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234253296/history
happymapping (2021-12-25 11:08:18+00:00): Ahh,
Ok, now I see... did a LOT of islets in short period of time and did not make enough attention for the naming of place, thought it got islet, but saved only with "is"... thanks for the update. Archie did correct it, he has good control :)
archie (2021-12-25 15:38:14+00:00): @happymapping Christmas gift for your fine cooperation during the year. Thanks a lot!
happymapping (2021-12-25 17:03:23+00:00): Thanks @archie, happy holidays and great wishes for 2022.
mueschel (2020-10-19 10:39:59+00:00): Hi,
could you check these buildings? They got a strange "tmp_verwijderen = in_use" tag.
Cascafico (2020-10-18 21:12:53+00:00): Non posso vedere, ma ricordati di non attaccarli alle highwway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92665898
Antonio Giacomini (2020-10-19 00:37:37+00:00): no certo, tutto staccato.
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:45:36+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Cebderby (2020-10-19 12:52:14+00:00): all your vandalism reverted
andrewsh (2020-10-18 19:39:41+00:00): Please make yourself familiar with: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names.

Unless these names are used in reality (on street signs, in documents, in speech etc), don’t put them in. Even if they’re on the official website.
zuicz (2020-10-21 08:34:43+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś zarośla przy budowie Novej Mikołowskiej?
user_4493657 (2020-10-21 22:56:35+00:00): Dzięki za czujność. Sugerowałem się zdjęciem, które pewnie jest już nieaktualne. Notatkę dopiero teraz odczytałem. Landuse wraz z notatką na nowo wyrysowałem.
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:44:45+00:00): source: bustimes.org
eggie (2020-10-18 19:39:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. probeer niet te schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op.
Beter is het om deze toevoegingen in twee aparte changesets te doen. 
Hoogstwaarschijnlijk was het hier goed getagd met bicycle=permissive.. Het is immers access=private  Fietsers en voetgangers hebben dan toegang op een prive terrein. 
permit is een tag die gebruikt wordt in bv wildparken waar je je bij de ingang moet melden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit

In the United States, at least, there is a fairly common situation of lands, roads, and barriers that require some sort of permit to pass, but where the permit is granted routinely on condition of complying with certain formalities. In many cases, the permit is free of charge and requires only notification to the operating agency. 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92667001
MVG,
Eggie
zuicz (2020-10-19 06:28:06+00:00): Poprzednie tagowanie nie było błędne
user_4493657 (2020-10-19 10:32:35+00:00): Nie twierdze, że były błędne. To jest miejsce kolizji infrastruktury drogowej i kolejowej. Chciałem zachować w miarę jak najwięcej informacji z tych dwóch typów systemów komunikacji. Wiem, że dla niektórych samochodów nieraz kluczowa jest obecność przeszkody drogowej i jej wysokość dlatego dodałem tunel. Do ścieżek dla pieszych również dodałem tunel, bo myślę, że w tym przypadku dla pieszych to również pożyteczna informacja np na temat schronienia. Odnośnie torów przeniosłem informację o wiadukcie z linii na obrys wiaduktu. Nie widzę przeszkód w ponownym dodaniu informacji o wiadukcie do torów, bo dla mnie takie informacje się są dublem.
user_4493657 (2020-10-19 10:42:31+00:00): Uważam również, bo być  może chodzi o ten nieszczęsny tag tunel, ze zamiast tagu tunel dla drogi pod wiaduktem lub kładką powinno być covered=yes.
zuicz (2020-10-19 11:43:55+00:00): Ja informację o maksymalnej wysokości dodałem w ten sposób
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838227769
Ale oba sposoby są raczej ok, i tunele i wiadukty
user_4493657 (2020-10-19 14:02:56+00:00): Z tymi przejazdami pod wiaduktami też jest ciekawa sprawa. Z tego co mi się wydaje to jeśli prześwit pod wiaduktem fizycznie wynosi minimum 5m (-0,5m marginesu bezpieczeństwa) w innej wersji 4,5m (-0,5m marginesu) to nie umieszcza się znaku zakazującego wjazdu pojazdom o określonej wysokości np. zakaz wjazdu pojazdów o wysokości większej niż 4,1m. Z tej przyczyny m.in. przejazdy pod wiaduktami na drogach szybkiego ruchu nie mają podanych ograniczeń wysokościowych (poza pewnymi wyjątkami).

W przykładzie, który podałeś (wiadukt niższy niż 4,5m, ze znakiem, na lokalnej drodze) ja bym jednak dodał dodatkowo do drogi tag choćby tunel lub covered, bo cześć pojazdów (dopuszczonych do ruchu w sposób legalny) już tędy prawdopodobnie nie przejedzie.
zuicz (2020-10-19 14:15:54+00:00): Na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tunnel jest
jeśli dolna droga jest krótka a górna droga jest na podłożu z betonu, cegły, na słupkach metalowych/belkach, to jest to na pewno most. Istnieją jednak sytuacje, w których jest to kwestia osobistej oceny, ale korzystne jest, aby oznaczyć dolną drogę, jako tunel lub górną drogę jako most, ale nigdy nie oba jednocześnie.