piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Runis (2019-09-23 09:21:42+00:00): Lietuvos kelių wikyje nurodyta jog galima atsižvelgti ir į kelių kategorijas. T.y. kaip savivaldybės prioritizuoja transporto susisiekimo pagrindines arterijas. Pvz kazlu rudoje aplinkelis per siaure yra B kategorijos kaip ir raj kelias, net zenklai sudeti kad patariama vaziuoti siuo keliu o ne per centra.
Tomas Straupis (2019-09-23 09:27:42+00:00): Bet čia dideliems miestams taikoma (Vilnius, Kaunas, Klaipėda). Problema tame, kad jei subjektyviai dėliosim kategorijas, tai tada kiekvienas susigalvos savo sistemą ir bus pastoviai perklasifikuojama. Dabar gi visi pakeisti keliai gavo secondary/tertiary kategorijas, kur na niekaip netempia iki kelio, kuris be numerio pažymėtas secondary/tertiary Kaune ar Vilniuje.
ChangwooRyu (2019-11-13 09:46:07+00:00): Welcome to the Dokdo vandalist club.
CRCulver (2024-08-12 16:35:48+00:00): You added a trail at coordinates 37.4323147, 73.1036590 with the name= tag "Steep Trail". In Tajikistan, name= tags should be in Tajik, not in English. Does this trail have an official name? If no, the name= tag should be deleted. If you want to express the steepness of the trail, then difficulty or incline tags are a more appropriate way to do that.
Rogoyski (2019-09-22 20:46:21+00:00): Odcinki ulicy opisane jako "Wiolinowa" nie należą w rzeczywistości do ulicy Wiolinowej. Przebieg ulicy Wiolinowej jest do sprawdzenia na mapa.um.warszawa.pl, poza tym gdyby to była ulica Wiolinowa, to sąsiedni blok nr 5 musiałby mieć numer parzysty.
eggie (2019-09-22 12:58:08+00:00): Ik heb de richting van het fietspad even omgedraaid. oneway=-1  wordt eigenlijk niet meer gebruikt.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-09-22 13:00:47+00:00): bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd na de splitsinge van het fietspad. 
dan staat de hoofdrijbaan op slot.
Kijk ook eens naar de gebruikelijke tagging van fietspaden. Nog veel te doen hier.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Eggie
mmjo (2019-09-22 15:10:29+00:00): Bedankt! Ik ga nog kijken naar die verkeersborden; maar ik probeer eerst de structuur goed te krijgen. 
Ik had dit wel al gezien: G12a staat aan het begin en gaat ongemerkt over in G11 :(
eggie (2019-09-22 17:16:19+00:00): Dan zal er ongetwijfeld ergens een verwijzing zijn voor Bromfietsers naar de hoofdrijbaan en A'dam is helemaal afwijkend ivm snorscooters  (mofa)  op de rijbaan.
Geen idee of dat allemaal inmiddels is aangepast in OSM.
BCNorwich (2019-09-22 14:15:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This is a Public Footpath as such bikes are not publicly allowed. So I removed the mtb:scale tag.
Regards Bernard.
Daniel Garapic (2021-01-14 03:26:29+00:00): Hi, I want to correct this "notice"
vng_me (2019-09-24 10:55:34+00:00): Разве стал доступен проезд с Витебской улицы на дворовую дорогу у дома на Немиге?
tux67 (2019-09-23 12:30:14+00:00): Ihr sollt doch nicht immer so durch den Wald stapfen, daß nachher alles "compacted" ist ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74772458
Sosha1996 (2019-09-24 09:08:22+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «ok» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aleph_null (2021-12-16 16:10:15+00:00): Hi Humus015, 

what does the tourism=attraction with the name “Car” mean? Is this a parking opportunity for viewing the lake? Or is there a noteworthy car here?

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6815636685#map=19/-11.37616/43.37153)
Humus015 (2021-12-17 09:39:34+00:00): Hallo, is more than one, and are remaining of old ones fully sprayed and painted.  Is an attraction in front of the beautiful lake you can find such kind of so called garbage.
aleph_null (2021-12-18 21:20:41+00:00): Good to know, thank you for your answer!
tkteun (2019-09-22 18:45:04+00:00): Ik kan zo niet zien wat ik gewijzigd heb aan de Kennedylaan, het kan zijn dat ik die per ongeluk verplaatst heb.
eggie (2019-09-22 19:49:01+00:00): Dit waren je edits.. Dan kun je zelf even checken.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74773023
Zo te zien niets aan de hand..
Eggie
Luzandro (2019-09-24 07:49:07+00:00): Hallo Werner,

du hast hier (und auch in anderen Changesets) bei einigen Wegen nicht nur Radwege/Werte hinzugefügt, sondern in einigen Fällen das highway-Tag komplett gelöscht, wodurch dort überhaupt kein Weg mehr ist, bpsw:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164534723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20420429

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74773075
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-22 15:49:30+00:00): não é uma câmara municipal, mas um local onde se pode aceder a serviços prestados por esta. corrigido
woodpeck (2019-09-24 09:45:34+00:00): Dear sopmod, please be advised that the mapping of private driveways is in line with OSM's rules if they are correctly marked as "private", which this way here clearly was: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/726853726/history - having this data in OSM can be useful in emergency situations or for orientation, and deleting that information from OSM is against our rules. You have also repeatedly deleted buildings from OSM even though these buildings are clearly visible on aerial imagery. Unless you can provide evidence that these buildings have indeed been torn down, please refrain from deleting them. Thank you.
trial (2020-03-02 11:49:44+00:00): Bonjour, Les suggestions Osmose sont à prendre avec des pincettes. Par exemple vous avez ajouté la station servie Intermarché de Moëlan là où elle fut alors que la station a déménagé en même temps que le magasin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1965425686
drlellinger (2019-10-27 15:39:52+00:00): Was soll das? Bürgersteige sind Teil von OSM. Sofort rückgängig machen!!!!
langoor (2019-09-22 16:07:46+00:00): Откуда вы берете информацию по адресам в деревнях?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:40:22+00:00): Здравствуйте!
К сожалению вы не ответили на комментарий к этому пакету правок.
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментариях, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
Nosyrin (2019-11-24 08:14:17+00:00): Там же, где и многие неопытные пользователи
Nosyrin (2019-11-24 08:14:36+00:00): Добрый день
langoor (2019-11-24 17:30:49+00:00): С 2014 года в проекте - не такой уж и неопытный. А я вас предупреждал: с Яндекса срисовывать не надо.
Nosyrin (2019-11-25 05:38:57+00:00): Да. Зареган я давно, но вносить активно информацию и разбираться что к чему я начал только в конце августа этого года. Мои правки последние полтора-два месяца вроде без косяков.
iWowik (2019-11-25 21:47:31+00:00): Таки вопрос не в косяках а источниках.
У неопытных с ними проблемы
Nosyrin (2019-11-27 08:19:32+00:00): Мне казалось, что я ответил. Или прямым текстом написать?
iWowik (2019-11-28 18:10:08+00:00): Да, а то не все всё сразу понимают.
Nosyrin (2019-12-01 08:01:10+00:00): Яндекс
mavl (2020-07-03 13:44:49+00:00): Здравствуйте, Nosyrin.  
  
В OpenStreetMap нельзя добавлять данные из каких-либо источников без явного разрешения правообладателя. Вы получили у Яндекса разрешение на добавление данных в OpenStreetMap?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Nosyrin (2020-07-03 14:16:26+00:00): Владимир, добрый день.
Нет не получал. Про запрет узнал позже. Давно таким не занимаюсь.
mavl (2020-07-03 14:57:00+00:00): Ясно. Спасибо.
viloan (2019-09-22 15:37:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ma-rt-in (2019-09-29 20:26:32+00:00): Hallo Horst,
wenn du das nächste Mal eine Haltestelle versetzt, dann bearbeite auch die Bus-Relationen. Durch deine Änderungen war zwar die Haltestelle richtig, aber die Busrelation kaputt. Habs korrigiert.
vg
eggie (2019-09-22 16:54:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-22 17:00:35+00:00): Review.. Je commentaar bij upload  is Mike en dat maakt niet echt duidelijk wat je hier gedaan hebt. 
Zo te zien heb je de verbindingen losgemaakt met de panden aan de boulevardkant. Dat geeft nu foutmeldingen. 
Wat was precies je bedoeling. Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Ik draai de changeset even terug en kijk dan of de foutmeldingen verdwenen zijn. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-22 17:02:42+00:00): reverted by changeset #74776939
muralito (2019-09-23 19:39:36+00:00): leisure=garden es para jardines importantes, como el jardin botanico, no para las plantas y flores que pueda haber en el retiro de las edificaciones.
Luzandro (2019-09-28 04:58:52+00:00): Hallo,

Name sollte nur den tatsächlichen Namen enthalten und keine generischen Beschreibungen oder Anmerkungen wie "Öffentlicher Durchgang": 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74775518
Carnildo (2019-09-23 07:56:41+00:00): The farmland you added doesn't look very farm-like to me, it looks like someone's back yard.  Are you sure you tagged it correctly?
DJ Cane (2019-09-23 13:31:31+00:00): I marked this as farmland because that piece of land (along with some others on residential properties) are primarily used as pasture for a small number of cows. 

When this part of Kennewick was annexed, a few families had farm animals and those who did were allowed to continue using their property as pasture.
Carnildo (2019-09-23 18:21:44+00:00): Might want to add a "note=" tag to that effect -- cows don't show up too well in aerial imagery.
freebeer (2019-09-24 06:35:01+00:00): actually, cows show up great.  i want to point you at a particular imagery where you could count the flies accompanying them, but i've searched in vain with the realisation the overflights were made at the end of winter when the meadows were barren and the cows were still in the barn.  i'll keep looking on that layer though.  mebbe i'll find a free-range chicken.

i actually know where to see summertime cows on the old bing overflights over europe where the identical imagery at z19 was available from multiple providers and i'd mark a cow from one and switch to the others to attempt to determine the conflicting metre-like offset plaguing the different imageries.

what my search in vain today uncovered is that farmland is for crops, with now a weird yellow rendering (i much preferred the earlier choice of a colour reminding me of a field of barley awaiting harvest, rippling in the breeze).

areas of pasture for grazing of free-range critters are better categorised in osm as meadows, and as i gaze at the map to the right i'm not seeing obvious farmland but probable meadow tagging, so i'm not sure why i bother to comment, given the lack of links to mappable cows (that normally tend to move, except when they're glaring at me as i wander by) that i was so certain i could offer.

i probably shouldn't have bothered to wake up.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 16:28:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2019-09-22 17:06:05+00:00): Dag Danniet.. Vaak is het zo dat tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van oneway=yes
Dan graag toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no
en
oneway:mofa=no
Is dat hier het geval?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-22 17:12:00+00:00): Ik heb oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd anders routeert het niet goed meer voor fietsres.
Gr eggie
glglgl (2019-09-23 09:38:33+00:00): What exactly was wrong with the relation Vereda Santa Teresa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3996625)?
glglgl (2019-09-23 09:45:42+00:00): Never mind, I just fixed it.
archie (2019-10-18 10:56:01+00:00): Varför ändrar du korrekt taggning (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335458300)? Innan du ändrar korrekt taggning bör du kolla med osm-hjälpen först: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
user_5359 (2019-09-22 16:47:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
azakh-world (2019-09-26 16:10:54+00:00): There are about 7700 bus stops in NY, almost all named after crossing streets. 24 are named differently, primarily by you. Are you going to continue? Then I'd advice to discuss such major change with other osmers. But before this, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only section of wiki. Assigning ref number of route to bus stop name is doubly incorrect: firstly, the article states "name is not ref", secondly, you go ahead and put ref of one entity to name of another one. It is a bus route relation ref=Q67 should be put on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus
SomeoneElse (2019-09-26 18:24:25+00:00): Can you provide any evidence that this bus stop is actually _named_ Q67?  It seems unlikely from looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5650245204/history .  If not, we may have to change these back.
user_385682 (2019-09-26 20:18:36+00:00): Go ahead and change it back.  I wanted to see how it renders.  

This is the problem:  The name of the bus stop is the intersection it serves. So the bus stop at 21st Street and 49th Avenue for example is called 21st Street and 49th Avenue.

The information that renders on the map in blue lettering and while accurate is useless to actual map users and clutters the map with obvious information.  

In real life here in NYC which routes are served by the bus stop IS useful info.  The first thing anyone asks on the street is for example "Does the Q57 stop here. 

This is information Google / Bing and other commercial map makers do not provide.

I would suggest naming the stops after the routes it serves because that will render on most browser default maps.

Failing that don't name the stop at all and just indicate the a bus stops there without the superfluous information.
azakh-world (2019-09-27 07:50:33+00:00): tylerchill,
we mustn't map for the render:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
We should not expect that the general-purpose map would render all features perfectly. There are specialized applications/renders for public transport, e.g., https://www.öpnvkarte.de/#-73.9492;40.7108;17 or https://www.thunderforest.com/maps/transport. They all tend to render bus route refs along the roads. In this case bus stop names like 'Q101, Q102, Q103' would be definitely useless and cluttering.
Mappers should provide precise and well structured data. It is application developers job to invent user friendly representation for it.
"Feature having no name should not have name tag" proposal sounds reasonable in this particular case. But, having defended OSM basics, I'd better stay apart of local affairs.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-29 11:44:09+00:00): OpenStreetMap's own website allows you to see bus routes easily https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74775874#map=19/40.74253/-73.94889&layers=T (that's using Thunderforest mapping).
pretzel12 (2019-09-22 16:37:05+00:00): Source: local knowledge + gpx track from hike
cadsauxk (2020-01-20 00:41:12+00:00): Olá Patodiez
não é apropriade e nem necessário duplicar o código da rodovia no campo do nome.
abraço
Gerald
iWowik (2019-10-17 10:26:48+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.
Причем делаете с ошибками:
addr:city=Краснодар ,пос. Северный
1) В addr:city должен быть только Краснодар. Этот поселок, часть города и при необходимости пишется в другом теге.
2) addr:city вообще считается излишне ставить на каждом домике, так как это определяется из положения внутри границы города.

Часто адресную информацию не просто найти.
Пожалуйста, скажите, а откуда вы ее берете?
iWowik (2019-11-23 14:47:51+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о моем комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос.
Где вы находите информацию об адресах домиков?
PT-53 (2019-09-23 07:20:03+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz entlang der B 31 Straßen gelöscht und andere neu eingezeichnet. Ist das jetzt der korrekte künftige Straßenverlauf?

Straßen, die noch im Bau sind, werden mit der Kombination highway=construction + construction=* markiert. Das schließt diese Straßen auch automatisch vom Routing aus. Eine zusätzliche Sperrung mit access=no ist daher unnötig.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-02 14:15:45+00:00): Hallo Stefan, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
StefanWanner28 (2019-10-03 13:02:13+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

bitte entschuldige die verspätete Antwort. 
Ja, der eingezeichnete Straßenverlauf ist der korrekte zukünftige Straßenverlauf. Danke dir auch für die Tipps bezüglich der korrekten Markierung der Straßen.

Liebe Grüße
Nmxosm (2019-09-23 13:53:49+00:00): Hallo schaeti001,

bei deinem Änderungssatz hast du neben dem Verschieben des Blinden- und Sehbehindertenverbundes auch die Adresse Wolfsgangstraße 61 entfernt. Ist das so gewollt?

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2020-04-19 08:41:28+00:00): Mit https://osm.org/changeset/83763324 erledigt.
JezCrow (2019-12-23 00:22:56+00:00): Hi Joe E,
I really appreciate the amount of work that you must have done to adjust these routes. So frustrating then that Arriva scrapped the S1 route completely after less than three months of the weekday service. They've now merged it into the X12 which doesn't appear to be mapped at all. That's one reason I haven't dabbled in adjusting bus routes yet - by the time I've completed some, they'll probably have changed again!
Happy mapping,
Jez.
Grönkille (2019-09-22 17:27:11+00:00): Named the new local streets in Eastern Fyrislund in Uppsala.
kartonage (2019-09-23 02:35:45+00:00): Hej boarmoss,

Google Streetview is not a valid source for changes to the OSM database due to incompatible licensing. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for more information.

Please only use sources that are agreeable with the Open Database License (like Mapillary) Thanks

Best regards
luiswoo (2019-09-22 17:16:42+00:00): Юго-Восточная прозона —  это не РнД, а Мясниковский район.
trial (2019-11-16 09:53:08+00:00): Place Drouet-d'Erlon ou Place Drouet d'Erlon ? Sur Wikipédia, il n'y a pas de trait d'union.
Truchin (2021-04-10 15:17:10+00:00): Bonjour Eric,
J'ai supprimé pas mal de bicycle=yes que tu avais ajouté sur les trottoirs. Y avait il néanmoins une explication ? Car en dehors des aménagements pourris de la ville d'Orléans où sont dessinés des logos vélos sur les trottoirs, pour le reste, il me semble que les vélos y sont interdits.
Bonne continuation

Thomas
maraf24 (2020-01-15 19:22:35+00:00): Może jakiś komentarz do tego kasowania POI?
maraf24 (2020-01-15 19:23:37+00:00): Pomyłka - komentarz miał iść do https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79530753, gdzie skasowane te punkty.
eggie (2019-09-22 17:50:16+00:00): Hi.. thanks for your contribution.. Your apartment is in the middle of nowhere. Please tag at the present addressnodes.
Gr eggie
Kautilya3 (2021-07-02 10:52:43+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I am wonder how the western boundary of the Mipi Circle came from. It is crossing valleys strangely. The map in the District Census Handbook doesn't do this: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1213_PART_B_DCHB_DIBANG%20VALLEY.pd
Kautilya3 (2021-07-02 10:54:40+00:00): Correcting the url: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1213_PART_B_DCHB_DIBANG%20VALLEY.pdf
Kautilya3 (2021-07-02 10:56:52+00:00): I am talking about this line: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/727301632
user_5359 (2019-09-24 03:57:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Brian Turcotte (2019-09-24 06:16:35+00:00): Source is the USWTDB 2.1 dataset from July 2019. Metadata for that is at: https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/assets/data/uswtdb_v2_1_20190715.xml
After converting the attributes that were directly relatable to standard tags, I left some of the remaining ones in, wasn't sure if they would be useful to anyone or if 
 it would be typical to remove all non-standard tags: case_id is the source unique stable identification number, t_conf_atr and t_conf_loc are attribute and location confidence level for the turbines, t_model is the turbine manufacturer's model name, t_rsa is the turbine rotor swept area.
I see I also left some t_rd tags - that's a mistake, they map to rotor:diameter.
user_5359 (2019-09-24 15:29:47+00:00): Thank you for the quick answer. 
Instead of the key case_id I recommend the key ref:source (is there really a decimal place?).

Instead of the key t_model I recommend the key generator:type. 

Are the values t_conf_atr , t_conf_loc, t_rsa not dependent on the model? If so, I would suggest deleting them.
Brian Turcotte (2019-09-25 15:44:52+00:00): Yes, that makes sense, thank you for the suggestions. I checked further and t_rsa is a derived value, so not that useful as a separate tag. I'll remove that and the confidence tags and update the source and type tags in the next few days.
Thanks for the review.