piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JezCrow (2020-08-16 17:58:54+00:00): Hi mkroberts1954,
By deleting the existing seamarks and replacing them, you've removed the fog horns that were mapped - do you know where they are now?
I also note your addition of yellow lights to *ALL* the turbines instead of just the four corner ones as before - seems unlikely to me but perhaps you have other information?
Regards,
Jez
mkroberts1954 (2020-08-17 09:26:21+00:00): Hi Jez
Thanks for noticing my mistakes. I have reverted the lights and horn to the settings of the original seamarks. Please check again in case I have made any other errors
Regards
Malcolm
Patchanka (2020-09-24 15:22:47+00:00): bonjour
je pense qu'il y a un petit soucis : La plus grande surface de Technoflex a été taguée en bâtiment mais ce n'est pas un bâtiment.b Et office=compagny j'ai un doute, ce sont vraiment les bureaux d'une entreprise ou plutôt un site industriel ?
Peut-être qu'il vaudrait mieux mettre man_made=works ? (=une usine, le site entier)
Qu'en pensez-vous ? Je suis loin d'être experte en description de sites industriels
Patchanka (2020-10-01 11:35:23+00:00): j'ai supprimé building=yes
et mis man_made=works au lieu de office=compagny
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 18:58:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
skquinn (2020-08-14 10:36:37+00:00): Some Houston changes got roped in by mistake, I think; this was only supposed to cover Madisonville.
parukhin (2021-01-17 13:32:27+00:00): Николай, здравствуйте.
Не удаляйте линии ВПП aeroway=runway
Почитайте wiki про Taxilane когда перетегируете в них taxiway:
"Taxilane is a path in an airport that is part of the aircraft parking area or apron"
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:19:01+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 23:48:07+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11500619

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11500620

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11500621

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 22:57:25+00:00): Met het achterlaten van 28 beschadigde bus routerelaties ben je weer recordhouder van de maand.
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 23:19:12+00:00): Je zou toch eens naar je techniek kunnen kijken:
Er is geen enkele reden om die twee stukken van de Brabantsestraat te vervangen. Je zou toch ook die weg netjes op kunnen knippen zodat de routes niet beschadigd worden.
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 23:20:14+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=5.37880&lat=52.16091&zoom=16&opacity=0.79&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
Sint E7 (2020-08-14 06:58:31+00:00): Dan moet je me dat toch eens uitleggen; als ik in JOSM de betreffende stukken Brabantsestraat download en de busroutes nakijk zitten die toch netjes aan elkaar, zonder gaten.
Wat zie ik dan over het hoofd?
Leo Slager (2020-08-14 23:22:47+00:00): Dan zie je over het hoofd dat ik die busroutes na middernacht al weer gerepareerd had.
Als je een route selcteert, kun je met ctrl-H de geschiedenis bekijken.
In de vergelijking van jou versie met mijn laatste wijziging zie je dan dat ik beide stukken van de Brabantsestraat heb moeten invoegen om de route weer volledig te maken.
Nu wil ik proberen na te gaan waarom het fout gaat. Kun je bevestigen dat je de Brabantsestraat op de normale wijze in drie stukken hebt opgeknipt ?
Ik wil dus proberen om, lokaal, de uitgangssituatie weer te creëren en daarna die weg opknippen.
Syl (2020-08-14 09:24:11+00:00): Bonjour, je crois qu'ici vous avez ajouté trop de points, un point correspond à un lampadaire, pas au nombre d'ampoule fixé dessus (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=street%20lamp).
Il faudrait donc plutôt ne laisser qu'un point par lampadaire à l'emplacement du poteau et utiliser la clé light:count pour renseigner le nombre d'ampoules.
mueschel (2020-08-15 10:22:51+00:00): I reverted this changeset - it simply duplicates roads and buildings already mapped.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-13 14:48:53+00:00): Hello! Are you finished with RGTR 142? I did a massive edit but i am stuck with a conflict on this relation. So I am waiting that you are done and resolve the conflict with both edits merged.
VoyagesWeber (2020-08-13 15:06:55+00:00): Hello! 
I will try to finish RGTR 142 tommorow, I only did one direction today. Kind regards.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-13 15:23:09+00:00): OK i just wanted to know if you would still be going on while i am in the same time resolving the conflict.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-13 18:18:34+00:00): I am done, all is the same except this secondary road portion https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516992644 i did not include. You had included both ways the service and the secondary to create the route whereas normally the bus has to stops on the service road. If there is a reason why you included both, please add it back.
VoyagesWeber (2020-08-17 06:50:58+00:00): Hi! 
There is indeed a reason:
The timetable says: Ieselslach -> Laiteschbaach -> Paul Rischard -> Gare. So the bus drives by at Sandweiler Gare. Then stops at the other busstops- and gets back to Sandweiler Gare. We are going to a lot of edits in the next weeks in order to prepare the RGTR-changes of 13.09.2020. Kind regards.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-17 07:46:18+00:00): OK good to know! Thanks!
L'imaginaire (2020-08-13 23:04:40+00:00): thanks!
GinaroZ (2020-08-14 14:25:02+00:00): Realtimetrains seems to show these services using platform 10 at Waverley
Sylvain M (2025-02-20 16:54:25+00:00): Salut @JLZIMMERMANN
J'ai vu l'Olivier en photo sur une alternative propriétaire de Panoramax, et je ne suis pas sûr que l'olivier centenaire entre dans la catégorie "natural_monument" (arbre remarquable).
Il m'a semblé bien rabougri...
Après, c'est une notion subjective, mais comme je m'intéresse à la cartographie des arbres remarquables, je me permets de te poser la question !
A+
Sylvain M.
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-02-24 14:01:31+00:00): salut,
comme il y avait une pancarte mentionnat cela. j'ai considéré que son installation et sa mention lui conférait ce statut. :-D
Merci de ta remarque
Jean-Louis
TaraV (2020-08-13 14:43:00+00:00): Wrong upload comment was submitted. Fixing roof_level of several buildings in Pariske komune, Belgrade, Serbia.
Syl (2020-08-14 09:19:40+00:00): Bonjour, 2 erreurs que j'ai remarqué ici :
- le bureau de poste existait déjà sur un point, comme vous l'avez aussi ajouté sur le bâtiment il y en a maintenant 2. Il faudrait n'en garder qu'un seul. On met un commerce (ou autre) sur un bâtiment uniquement si il occupe tout le bâtiment, sinon c'est un point à part à l'intérieur du bâtiment. Quelle est la situation ici ?
- l'école que vous avez ajouté continue d'être un bâtiment, il ne faut pas enlever cette information.
DaveF (2020-08-13 16:52:27+00:00): Does QEW (west) still have shared pavements?
ACarlotti (2020-08-13 17:44:36+00:00): I believe so - I remember seeing the 'end of shared pedestrian/cycle area' sign just round the corner on Fendon Road (south) a few days ago. I don't know how far they extend.
noelbov (2020-08-23 09:09:05+00:00): Dag Eebie,
die wandelwisselpunten (16 tot 23) die u een tiental dagen geleden hebt aangebracht aan de Grote Plas in Dilsen-Stokkem, gaan die deel uitmaken van een wandelnetwerk? Tot nu toe staan die gerapporteerd als 'knooppuntwezen' op https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/nl/orphan-nodes/be/rwn
Kan de network:type -tag anders verwijderd worden?
mvg.
Noël
Eebie (2020-08-23 10:24:27+00:00): Dat zijn geen knooppunten van een knooppuntenwandelnetwerk maar "Wandelwissels". Dat zijn kruispunten van wandellussen waar je overstappen van de ene wandellus naar de andere en die ook de kaarten staan waardoor wandelaars kunnen zien waar ze zijn op de kaart.
philippec (2020-09-26 16:24:47+00:00): indoor, access ?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 22:04:20+00:00): A user went through and deleted a lot of these roadways in this changeset and others in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133145661

I tried reverting, but the revert site had an issue.  Not sure why.  Maybe you can help sort it out.  I'm reporting user to DWG as well.
AndyB_66 (2020-08-13 19:53:24+00:00): Kolego, wycofaj, proszę, swoje zmiany, bo nie mają sensu (jak z Lublina na węźle pojechać na Warszawę? Usunąłeś przewiązkę, która wciąż tam jest i będzie) i są niezgodne ze stanem faktycznym.
AndyB_66 (2020-08-13 19:54:32+00:00): Błędnie wprowadziłeś ruch jednokierunkowy na dwukierunkowym fragmencie od łącznicy do przewiązki.
AndyB_66 (2020-08-13 19:56:07+00:00): Obejrzyj sobie filmik: https://youtu.be/5yzfg5kXaDU
abakus_uploader (2020-08-13 22:31:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dooley (2020-08-14 09:36:15+00:00): Warum hast du name:de auf Belarus geändert? Laut Auswärtigem Amt https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/service/terminologie/-/215252 ist für Beschriftungen von Landkarten (als solche verstehen wir uns wohl auch)  "Republik Weißrussland" bzw. "Weißrussland"  zu verwenden. Bitte ändere das wieder zurück, wir müssen nicht jedem journalistischem Blödsinn hinterherlaufen. Danke.

Zitat: Für den innerstaatlichen Schriftverkehr sowie Beschriftung von Landkarten gelten die traditionellen Bezeichnungen "Republik Weißrussland" mit ihren Ableitungen (siehe "Weißrussland"). Im amtlichen zwischenstaatlichen Schriftverkehr (förmliche Dokumente u. dgl.) "Republik Belarus".
Claudius Henrichs (2020-08-21 19:33:20+00:00): Hallo, Zuerst: OpenStreetMap ist keine Landkarte, sondern Sammlung freier Geodaten. Eines unserer wichtigsten Empfehlungen ist hierbei die "on the ground"-Regel. Wir erfassen also Daten, wie sie vor Ort vorzufinden sind, bzw. verwendet werden. Bei Ländernamen ist es mit der Verifikation "am Boden" natürlich etwas schwierig. Aber dein Link zum AA bietet da schon einen ersten Ansatzpunkt. Weitere Beispiele:
* Länderseite "Belarus" des deutschen AA: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/laender/belarus-node
* Eigenbezeichnung der Botschaft der Republik Belarus: http://germany.mfa.gov.by/de/
* Eine nachvollziehbare Erklärung im Stern: https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/belarus-oder-weissrussland--wie-heisst-das-land-wirklich--9378414.html
* Auch im deutschsprachigen Alltag hat der Begriff Einzug gehalten: Deutsche Post Länderseite: https://www.dhl.de/de/privatkunden/pakete-versenden/weltweit-versenden/land/belarus.html
Aus Respekt vor der Belarussischen Bevölkerung, die offenbar diesen Begriff bevorzugt halte ich es für angemessen, den modernen deutschen Begriff in OpenStreetMap zu hinterlegen.
Claudius Henrichs (2020-08-21 19:38:52+00:00): Ach ja: "Weißrussland" ist als deutscher Alternativname immer noch hinterlegt.
abakus_uploader (2020-08-13 22:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GinaroZ (2020-08-13 21:33:06+00:00): Is that the correct location? Because the canals website says the towpath has been closed between the A801 and Vellore Road. https://www.scottishcanals.co.uk/news/union-canal-closure-breach-at-muiravonside/ I was thinking it was around here from the pics: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2305388
Chris Fleming (2020-08-18 12:25:17+00:00): Sorry yes, totally mixed up my east and west somehow. Sorting out now.
FransWillem (2020-08-27 09:21:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are not so accurate as we might expect. 
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Jose Luis Infante (2020-08-13 16:59:50+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició, encara que una biblioteca s'etiqueta com amenity=library. 
Si tens qualsevol dubte tens la wiki d'OSM. Per exemple, l'etiqueta que has fet servir no és una biblioteca (propiament dita): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=public%20bookcase?uselang=ca
Salutacions!
vasony (2020-08-13 19:09:11+00:00): jó hogy kedden jártam én is erre, most mindenen conflict van, csak fel kellett volna tölteni...
feket (2020-08-13 19:33:39+00:00): Bocsi! :) Csak hiányzó házszámokat és pár térfigyelő kamerát jegyeztem fel (Paulay Ede u környékén). Nyugodtan reverteld, ha sok munkád veszne kárba, és ez neked könnyebbség lenne!
vasony (2020-08-13 19:48:52+00:00): Jó ez így.
Ugyanazokat a számokat mértük, fel, ez a jó hír. 
Épp csak elkezdtem felvinni, így végül is megspóroltad nekem a felvitelt :)
Csak a tűzcsapok meg automaták maradtak.
Frans S (2020-10-20 12:21:26+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
chlenix (2020-08-14 07:42:21+00:00): когда что-то двигаешь смотри на соседние объекты. и не двигай не зная смещения снимков, тем более если до тебя уже кто-то нарисовал что-то для подложки UkraineMykolaiv2018 используй смещение 9.64/8.13
прошу в будущем выравнивать снимки по жпс-трекам, или страве. или для подложки UkraineMykolaiv2018 используй смещение 9.64/8.13. для подвижки больших объектов используй перемещение по точкам, а не всего сразу, так ты не затронешь соседние объекты.
Znaika (2023-11-01 16:01:47+00:00): Hallo,
anscheinend war irgendwann "k" mit "g" im Straßennamen Riskeskirchweg in Kaarst-Büttgen vertauscht. 
Straßenschild: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?signs=true&points=true&lat=51.204065154097&lng=6.6069657787759&z=18.243504087829418&pKey=247025154053675&focus=photo
Geoportal RKN oder NRW zeigt es  mit "g" und ist falsch
user_5359 (2020-08-14 04:59:33+00:00): Hello! Please Please read page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack for a better description of the tag leisure=track. I don't believe this this the correct tag for your situation.
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 15:21:41+00:00): I originally had it as a "Cycle Trail" but another reviewer changed them all to the Race Track (Non-Motorized) so I kept that going.  BUT, Cycle Track and even Cycle Path is not technically right.  There is nothing available that describes a "Single Track Mountain Biking Trail" and there are thousands of miles of trails in Utah alone.  What should we use for this?
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 15:25:10+00:00): FYI, Deer Valley, one of the largest downhill Mountain biking mountains in Utah, lists all it's single track as just "Path".  Seems wrong that there is not a designation for "Single Track" since some trails in Deer Valley are for Hiking, while others are exclusive to Mt. Biking, but there is no way to assign a difference.  Suggestions?
user_5359 (2020-08-14 15:32:04+00:00): Did you know the page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:access (bicycle, foot)?
Can you please the number of changed change set which was modified by the other reviewer (I didn't find a comment for this change)?
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 15:35:09+00:00): Since I am only 5 days into learning OpenStreetMap and have been busy building our ranch, I have not learned how to bring up change versions yet.  I only got to this after seeing the emails:)

The trail change to track happened 2 days ago I believe. It surprised me since all my trails were marked as Cycle Trails and then I clicked on them again later that day and they were Racetrack.
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 15:36:48+00:00): Thanks for the Wiki info on mountain biking.  I will review and designate this way with difficulty.  We also added difficulty in the descriptions too.
phidauex (2020-08-14 15:55:52+00:00): Hi, if you'd prefer an example, here are some correctly tagged singletrack trails near me - note that they specifically indicate the allowed uses, have mtb:scale and mtb:scale:imba, which are similar but not always the same, and all of the trails are included in a relation which groups them as "Heil Valley Ranch" and as a route of type "mtb", which helps rendering on many maps.

Picture Rock Trail: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219358384#map=14/40.1949/-105.2782&layers=N

Lichen Loop trail - foot traffic only: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569766840

The mtb relation "wrapping" the trails. Relations are a more advanced editing tool, but you can use this example as a guide: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8409088#map=13/40.1731/-105.2855&layers=N

Hope that helps!
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 16:10:33+00:00): Great examples.  Thanks. 

Can you look at the trail I just updated for Tombstone.  Let me know if that is correct now and I will do the rest of the uphill and downhill trails.
phidauex (2020-08-14 17:11:08+00:00): Hi, looks much better! I made a few small tweaks, which you can see in this history view: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/836527871

TIP: To get to these history views, select a way or object in the iD editor, and hit "Shift-ctrl-H" or "Shift-Cmd-H" on a Mac, which will bring up a little history window. From there you can click links to see that object's history, information about the user, etc. Very handy.

I made a few minor changes:
- Changed incline to "up" instead of "yes", this means that, if you are riding in the direction of the arrows on the way, you are going "up". The tag can be left off for trails that equally go up and down.
- mtb:scale:uphill is an optional tag that says how hard it is to go up, if the trail does indeed go up.
- Description is more for other mappers than it is for the map - I simplified the text a bit.
- I also simplified the sport tag, while you can put anything in there, some tags are very rarely used and not very useful. In this case, cycling + mtb tags implies mountain biking, which is understood by the routing tools.

Keep up the good work editing, and don't hesitate to ask if you have questions. You can also join the OSM US Slack channel if you have quick questions on tagging or want another set of eyes on your edits: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
High Star Ranch (2020-08-14 18:07:50+00:00): The reason I said yes instead of up is that some trails are both up and down. I didn't see a way to say both.

How do I designate a directional only trail? 

I am trying to make sure our trails copy what I did on our Google My Maps and embedded in the website:
https://www.highstarranch.com/high-star-trail-map/
phidauex (2020-08-14 18:34:53+00:00): If the trail goes up and down, then you can just omit the tag entirely. You could also then omit mtb:scale:uphill.

If a trail is directional, then there is a button on the way info to indicate "oneway", which adds the tag "oneway = yes". If the one-way arrows are pointing the wrong way, then next to the one-way button near the top there is a "reverse way" option. You can also right-click on a way and "Reverse" it there.
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 19:03:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-14 15:46:25+00:00): Ik denk dat de naamswijziging niet correct is.
Het is een zijstraat van de Brederodeweg
Leo Slager (2020-08-15 16:02:58+00:00): Je hebt gelijk, ik pas het even aan.
Coolmato (2020-08-14 03:14:41+00:00): Bicycles permitted but encouraged to dismount and walk because it's a narrow path shared with pedestrians
FransWillem (2020-08-15 13:06:32+00:00): I would thank you for mapping here, but something went wrong with your contribution
You have overlooked  the instructions which asked to map from the Maxar Premium Imagery.
Probably your Ideditor  start default with Bing.
Bing is outdated (2013-2016) and since then a big quantity of refugies have been returned to their own country. So most of this camp is demolished.
https://www.unhcr.org/ke/12985-un-refugee-chief-dadaab-camps-reassures-refugees-returnees-host-community-unhcrs-support.html

So all your mappings here will be removed. Sorry, but it is as it is.
Please  pay attention to this subject.

Please be a bit realistic when you map something.
A round building of about 300 mtrs is not logic in a desert area. These are natural phenomena
Best regards and please, keep mapping|

Here is a link to some hints 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Leo Slager (2020-08-13 19:22:23+00:00): review:
Dag Bart,
cycleway:opposite kan er dan vanaf.
goods=no is foutief. Het verkeersbord is alleen bedoeld voor hgv.
ik pas het even aan.
d1sr4n (2022-05-23 17:53:22+00:00): Привет. Реки шириной по 8 метров это river а не stream.

Stream описывается как совсем маленький ручеек, который можно перепрыгнуть в любом месте.
ednzxt (2022-05-23 18:09:48+00:00): Ок, нужно было быть внимательнее. Масштаб по списку не дооценил.