piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eduardoaddad (2020-10-14 22:03:41+00:00): De nada.
MatthieuMartin (2021-11-11 17:49:35+00:00): Bonjour,

La balise name=* ne doit pas avoir de nom tout en majuscule.
Voir :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Respectez_les_conventions_d.27.C3.A9criture_pour_l.27attribut_name

Bonne carto!
Cordialement,
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:51:58+00:00): source: bustimes.org
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
CRCulver (2022-02-22 20:20:17+00:00): You added smoothness=very_bad to some asphalt roads. This is almost never appropriate and it will break routing for trekking bikes.
grelus (2022-02-22 20:27:20+00:00): You can check the condition of the road on mapillary. Example (1,5 year ago so the road deteriorated even more now): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=182574480405537
CRCulver (2022-02-22 20:31:36+00:00): That road looks perfectly manageable for bikes with robust wheels (the definition of smoothness=bad on the wiki).
grelus (2022-02-22 20:37:07+00:00): ok, so maybe it should have be "bad" not "very bad"
CRCulver (2022-02-22 20:42:58+00:00): Yeah, very_bad is more of a tag used on roads which even normal cars would find risky or impassable.
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:13:27+00:00): 9800-9999
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Ser9ei (2021-06-22 09:27:33+00:00): А можно, нанося электрические сети, не дублировать объекты, а добавлять теги к существующим? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126937404
marczoutendijk (2020-10-14 19:35:36+00:00): Highways=Landuse!
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
marczoutendijk (2020-10-14 19:35:47+00:00): Highways=landuse.
colgza (2020-10-16 15:26:43+00:00): The East Busway is not a guided busway. It does not have tracks.
colgza (2020-10-16 15:32:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway
colgza (2020-10-16 15:39:19+00:00): > Do not use this on normal paved roadways that are designated for buses only. One correct tagging for those is highway=service, access=no, bus=designated.
ctoocheck (2020-10-16 17:30:46+00:00): Can we get a "busway" option? It's silly to mark this busway as a service road. It has a fixed route service running exclusively on it, the P1 east busway, which has frequent service matching that of the light rail.
ctoocheck (2020-10-16 17:32:40+00:00): The same is true for many other places, e.g. LA Metro G (orange) Line. It should be shown similar to light rail.
colgza (2020-10-16 17:35:17+00:00): I completely agree with your rationale. I've actually started drafting a proposal page for this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/BRT
colgza (2020-10-16 17:37:58+00:00): I was thinking that not only should grade-separated busways (such as the East Busway) be highlighted as prominently as light rail lines, but prominent bus stations (such as Atwood Station and East Liberty stations) should be as well.
colgza (2020-10-16 17:39:45+00:00): This is my first time writing a feature proposal, and there is a lot that I would need to get right before submitting it. If you would like to help me, check out the guidelines for writing then: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
colgza (2020-10-16 17:43:18+00:00): I've had a lot of ideas about what I would actually write, but as I started to sit down and write, I forgot most of those ideas. I do know that there is a lot of nuance that goes into deciding exactly what tags a feature should use. Unfortunately, I don't quite understand this nuance.
colgza (2020-10-16 17:44:57+00:00): Anyway, I think we can make a good case for a set of BRT-related tags.
ctoocheck (2020-10-16 17:51:43+00:00): I'm new to this too. If I can figure it out I'm happy to help.
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:51:48+00:00): source: bustimes.org
opencarpatia (2020-11-13 21:18:45+00:00): Добрий день, прошу пояснити суть ваших змін. В чому полягає "correction"? І чому було видалено характиристику дороги "Smoothness:Bad" яку я вказав після перевірки на місці -- без жодного адекватного пояснення і без інформування про видалення мого внеску?

Hello, please explain what you've changed here. What is behind "correction" made? And why you deleted "Smoothness:Bad" road property that I specified after inspection on place -- without any meaningful explanation and/or informing about removing of my contribution?
VARVAR8 (2020-11-20 19:01:52+00:00): "Smoothness:Bad" - нерегламентований теґ. Він придуманий навіть без обговорень зі спільнотою. Можна поцікавитись для чого він? Яка від нього користь?
opencarpatia (2020-11-24 22:39:30+00:00): Твій коментар містить вигадки, брехливу інформацію і по суті є тролінгом. Спільнота давно обговорила і затвердила вказаний тег та дозволені значення. Він підтримується популярними редакторами "JOSM" та "iD" і валідаторами. Замість демонстрації невігластва звинувачуючи інших, прошу ознайомитись з доступною документацією.

https://WIKI.OPENSTREETMAP.ORG/wiki/Key:smoothness

Your comment contains fabrication, fake information and actually is a trolling. Community already discussed & confirmed mentioned tag and allowed values. It is supported by popular "JOSM" and "iD" editors & validators. Instead of demonstrating incompetency by blaming others, please read available documentation.

https://WIKI.OPENSTREETMAP.ORG/wiki/Key:smoothness
opencarpatia (2020-11-25 11:04:49+00:00): ЛенькоМарія, ви збираєтесь врешті пояснити чому ви видалили мої внески чи вирішили вибрати режим ігнорування? Мені потрібні пояснення причини видалень. Якщо це сталось випадково - прошу негайно повернути всі мої зміни які стосують оцінки стану доріг назад.

ЛенькоМарія, are you actually going to explain why you deleted my contributions or you choose to ignore? I need explanation on reasons of these deletes. If that was done in error - please put back all my changes related to the roads quality inspection.
VARVAR8 (2020-12-15 17:12:50+00:00): smoothness=bad - є такий, а smoothness:bad - немає. Але я більше
мав на увазі ваш теґ smoothness:date, а він точно ніде не фігурує у вікі, чи може я не правий?
opencarpatia (2020-12-15 23:11:33+00:00): 1) якщо мною НІКОЛИ не було вказано "smoothness:bad" - то які до мене по цьому питання і для чого мені пояснення про те що він не існує??
2) smoothness:date елементарно знаходиться через сервіс тег інфо. Об’єкти з цим ключем правилися 600+ різними учасниками. Кількість об'єктів з цим тегом 26000+. Є маса інших тегів/значень які не фігурують в OSM Wiki але також широко використовуються.
L'imaginaire (2020-10-14 19:45:29+00:00): zie ook https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/0OHGzaJGAoDgxRvri4Q2w5
Discostu36 (2020-10-14 20:19:03+00:00): Please keep your changesets inside of one country or even better one region. It makes reviewing changes easier.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92490581
letihu (2020-10-14 21:51:51+00:00): Stimmt, hätte ich aufteilen sollen. Leider wohl übersehen.
SK53 (2020-10-14 20:40:33+00:00): Might be worth retaining the old name as alt_name or old_name too.
Glassman (2020-10-15 13:27:38+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92491381
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:20:58+00:00): 9600-9799
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:22:13+00:00): 9400-9599
mbethke (2020-10-15 08:00:29+00:00): Hi,

please don't invent your own tags but stick to the ones documented on the wiki, or your data will not be useful for anyone else.
I have commented on some of them here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91435510

Also (I'm not sure whether you're part of a team and this should actually go to your boss) please don't just create new accounts when one gets temporarily blocked as has happened for Ruminda12.

cheers,
Mattthias
djeu_fd (2020-10-15 09:10:50+00:00): come si evince dalla wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway quel tratto di strada, in quanto strada statale, è PRIMARY
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:11:08+00:00): 9000-9199
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:09:14+00:00): 8800-8999
ivanbranco (2021-12-22 17:04:39+00:00): Hi Rom1,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859055432

what's the meaning of parking_space=farmland?
Rom1 (2021-12-22 17:24:08+00:00): Hi, it's a mistake. I correct it. Thanks.
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:08:29+00:00): 8600-8799
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:07:57+00:00): 8400-8599
DenisJu (2020-11-07 19:40:39+00:00): Hello Ned_Stark!
Is this section of the road already finished?
Do you live in this area in TIrana and already know what's going on?
You changed this street from "under construction".
Regards Denis
Ned_Stark (2020-11-09 17:39:39+00:00): Hi, thank you for reaching out. I don’t live in Tirana. It looked like the road was open to vehicles  in mapillary dated on September 20th. I noticed that the road wasn’t completely paved at that point but I decided not to edit smoothness or surface on the road ways. I wasn’t able to find more recent information at that time. I apologize if that edit is outdated or incorrect.
wolfbert (2026-05-01 07:15:59+00:00): Ist in 1220.
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:07:15+00:00): 8200-8399
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:04:42+00:00): 8000-8199
felipeeugenio (2020-10-19 19:48:13+00:00): Estimado César. vemos que los cambios de categorías de calles no tienen relación alguna con la naturaleza de las calles. Te pedimos por favor recordar de que no se puede mapear para que los ruteos de algún software coincidan con lo que quieres ver. Te pedimos por favor dejar de cambiar las ediciones de otros maperos sin consultar con la comunidad
Gregory Peony (2023-05-14 02:13:40+00:00): Buildings are not square. In future please press "q" to square them.
Gregory Peony (2023-05-14 02:15:49+00:00): You joined a residential area and building node. Please do not do this in future.
Comenzamos (2020-12-13 16:38:53+00:00): Hola,
Aquí la clasificación no se puede vincular y
Aquí los cambios de datos que ha realizado están incompletos. Tenga cuidado al modelar los datos en las uniones y no elimine los datos innecesariamente. Ver Osm Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary_link
GhostEye (2020-12-14 16:19:05+00:00): Buenos días Comenzamos, gracias por su retroalimaentación. Valoro mucho la respuesta de los editores locales y quiero asegurarme de mantener la integridad de los datos. Podría, por favor, enviarme el vínculo a la ubicación del objeto en IDEditor para poder asegurarme de hacer las mejores ediciones posibles?
Comenzamos (2020-12-16 09:40:55+00:00): Hola
Consulte OSmcha https://osmcha.org/changesets/95761436.
Gracias.
chnav (2020-10-21 09:43:25+00:00): There is no road connection between two servioce roads. It is you imagination that road under tree present.

Changeset fully reverted.
EarthtoTones (2020-10-22 22:39:42+00:00): Hello chnav, thank you for being thorough as an osm user. I appreciate your feedback. Take care!
Nordpfeil (2020-10-15 10:44:40+00:00): Hallo Theo, first of all welcome in the club of OSM mappers! Concerning the Sport Complex I will ask you to improve your mapping as follows: to map different surfaces like "grass" and "rubber" you have to add a leisure=pitch (with surface=grass) [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch] and a leisure=track (with surface=tartan) [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack] separately to the sports center. Then delete the non existing keys "Field Type" and "track" from the Sport Center. Have fun!
Theo DeLeon (2020-10-15 23:57:56+00:00): Thank you for the feedback! My mapping is a part of one of my college courses at Virginia Tech. I will make the suggested edits and remember them while I continue to map.

Danke!
FasterTracker (2020-10-15 14:00:04+00:00): Be careful with the imagery you use. 
I'm saying this because the imagery you used to map the buildings made them off place. 

Sometimes, depending on the place the aerial photo was taken, the image can be off by a few meters.
You can fix this problem by using the "Imagery Offset" function in "Background Settings".

The best imagery to use is Ortofotos in order to confirm if the mapping is in the right place. However, since it's more than a decade old, the option I've mention above is a better one.

Hope you don't take this as an attack, just as an advice. :D
Better data = better map
Note Control (2020-10-17 12:24:40+00:00): Hi,

i don't feel this as an attack.  You told you will ride to this area again. So i tough let map this 2 buildings. I compared different Sat views to choose the medium of all this. Yes, i know this can be  few meters  off. In the city this will be a problem, but at countryside i think its more important to have the building mapped. And if the person is not a mapper they even will no see / care about a  little difference.  More important is to know that there is a building. I will check your suggestion next time before adding something new.   
 Let's mapping :)
Glassman (2020-10-15 13:30:11+00:00): TiP. Street names are spelled out in OSM. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix 80th Avenue  you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92494276
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-15 05:26:23+00:00): Please do not remove embassy tags. iD is known to be making dumb tag change offers.
joost schouppe (2023-10-06 12:13:11+00:00): Ik denk niet dat de school de hele site gebruikt hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11755779
Ik vermoed dat het niet om een school gaat maar enkel kinderopvang; en dat die in nr 47 zit. Ook nog spelfout gezien: "Pannenfabrief"
Eebie (2023-10-06 17:03:00+00:00): De fouten zijn gewerkt
joost schouppe (2023-10-07 09:09:33+00:00): Merci!
aixbrick (2020-10-15 15:45:50+00:00): Hallo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859071597: Die Autobahn hier ist bereits als Brücke gemappt. Tunnel und Brücke gleichzeitig kann nicht sein.
Gruß
LWChris (2020-10-16 00:03:18+00:00): Okay, dann sollte "Brücke" wahrscheinlich eher raus? Die Autobahn verläuft an dieser Stelle auf "normalem" Niveau, wohingegen die Straße "Gewerbepark Brand" von beiden Seiten mit Gefälle unter die Autobahn abtaucht und auf der anderen Seite wieder hochkommt. Außerdem ist der Tunnel schmaler als die Straße, weswegen diese sogar mit Vorrangsregelung verengt wird. Wird diese Ansicht geteilt?
aixbrick (2020-10-16 05:59:39+00:00): In OSM gibt es die Regel, dass eine Brücke immer Widerlager/Pfeiler hat, ein Tunnel nicht (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bridge). Das Niveau oder die Breite spielt dabei keine Rolle. Ich kenne die Situation hier zwar, weiß aber aktuell nicht, ob es Widerlager gibt oder nicht. Das sollte ggf. nochmal vor Ort überprüft werden.
aixbrick (2020-10-18 12:06:21+00:00): Bin vor Ort gewesen. Das sieht für mich eindeutig wie eine Brücke aus. Ich habe daher in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92654630 die Tunnel-Tags entfernt.
Glassman (2020-10-15 13:30:37+00:00): Tip: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92494451
Glassman (2020-10-15 13:31:23+00:00): Tip: use a more descriptive changeset comment than #BTE. for example, added house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92494562
BCNorwich (2020-10-18 18:17:22+00:00): Hi, 
Please be aware that there is now a duplication of a section of the A4 road. Placing one highway atop another is not combining a highway it's duplication. Further with several nodes joined together and combining 9 sections (each way), of route relation sections this makes for seriously interrupted if not impossible routeing.

Could you please look to remedy this? 
Regards Bernard.
PiersG (2020-10-18 19:36:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for the valid feedback. I don't have the tools to revert. Do you have JOSM and the revert plugin? If not, I'll download it and revert it back to what it was before.
BCNorwich (2020-10-19 06:14:52+00:00): Hi, This changeset is now reverted, two conflicts of oneway tag resolved OK. 
There were to many sections of highway with differing relation sections to just revert the duplication. 

My revert changeset #92682100  (if it needs rolling back).

Regards Bernard.
PiersG (2020-10-19 07:47:09+00:00): Thank you!
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 18:49:40+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. The correct name of this federal highway is Mena-Ciudad Industrial Xicohtencatl (You wrote the name of the town). Also, this is a tertiary road. Finally, the reference is also wrong. Highway MEXICO136 is also in Tlaxcala but is not that one. I am sending you all highways in Tlaxcala State.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92495407
LSkalayo (2020-10-21 18:58:35+00:00): Thank you for reaching out. I did not add the name to this road, I did not add the ref tag, and I did not affect the classification  for this road. They were already present in OSM and had been added by other editors. Since I did not have the correct name of the road, I left the one that another user had already added. You can select the history of the object in OSM to determine which editors added the name and the ref tag. I hope that offers some clarity for you. 

Gracias por comunicarte. No agregué el nombre a esta ruta, no agregué la etiqueta de referencia y no afecté la clasificación de esta ruta. Ya estaban presentes en OSM y habían sido añadidos por otros editores. Como no tenía el nombre correcto de la ruta, dejé la que ya había agregado otro usuario. Puede seleccionar el historial del objeto en OSM para determinar qué editores agregaron el nombre y la etiqueta de referencia. Espero que le ofrezca algo de claridad.
mdelatorre (2020-10-24 22:54:42+00:00): I know that you didn't add those features. But you did modify the name of the way. It can help everybody while you are there to verify the name. Have a good day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92495407
Gazer75 (2020-10-14 23:05:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Make sure you do not use Bing in Norway it is inaccurate. Use the preferred imagery Norway Orthophoto
FredrikLindseth (2020-10-15 06:57:04+00:00): Also I'm guessing the HOT tags shouldn't be on your changeset in Norway
FredrikLindseth (2020-10-15 06:57:45+00:00): For clarity, these: " #hotosm-project-5766 #kenya #missingmaps #measles #redcross "
OddlyAngled (2020-10-21 21:12:11+00:00): are you planning to finish mapping out way 859083906? it is currently invalid
Fluffy89502 (2020-10-21 22:01:12+00:00): Yes. My bad about forgetting about this.
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-12 21:40:30+00:00): Hi, it looks like you accidentally changed a county border to a road. It probably happened because the border goes down the middle of Fields Ertel, which was already mapped as a road. The border apparently got selected when you tried to click on the road. To avoid accidentally editing borders in the future, you can filter them out by opening the Map Data panel on the right and deselecting Boundaries in the Map Features section. Let me know if you have any questions or run into any problems mapping something.
user_5359 (2020-11-09 04:56:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/859016376/history. You paint this as one line, but this a typical multipolygon relation (two lines (one with role outer and one with the role inner) combined in a relation. 
What source is "uhul:wms"? Is this source compatible with the OSM license?
And PLEASE write change comments describing what you changed.
mariotomo (2020-10-15 02:00:49+00:00): Hola Carlos, al final no te gustó el proyecto 170?
https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/170?task=34
user_5359 (2020-12-28 18:34:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your streets are not visible because you use the tag addr:street=residential instead highway=residential.
user_8722718 (2020-10-15 13:13:19+00:00): jesus christ
Larryolaoi (2020-10-15 13:50:47+00:00): lol
bernardo60 (2021-03-09 03:40:38+00:00): This should be an administrative boundary (therefore a line) and not a village (area).
fūrai-bō (2026-02-05 18:29:43+00:00): この変更セットで、サンクス浜松馬込店だったものがファミリーマートに変更されていますが、このファミリーマートは有史以来一度も実在していません。
サンクス浜松馬込店の閉店時期は不明ですが2013年前後頃と思われ、これはファミリーマートへの転換が始まるよりも前です。
またこの編集が実施された2020-10-15には既に閉店していて店そのものが実在していません。
虚偽の編集とみなし、実在しないファミリーマートを削除しました。
TravGW (2020-10-15 14:08:49+00:00): Welcome to "Colonia" County. Colonias are at minimum neighborhoods. Others in the countryside could be hamlets or, more rarely, villages.
mvexel (2020-10-15 14:44:04+00:00): Interesting, I had no idea! 

After discussing on Slack I came to the conclusion that this Challenge needs Local Knowledge in many places, so I am setting the flag to make it so. Here it is in case you want to work on it, but it won't show up in MapRoulette search any longer: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/14634
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-15 03:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92499171 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Northern Brazil.  See block 3988 et al
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:13:04+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

Utiliza la etiqueta amenity=fountain para identificar una fuente. No utilices comillas en los nombres. No se utiliza agregar para esta característica la etiqueta addr:*
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92498911
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-15 17:50:14+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding your business to the map! I see that you've requested a review, so here it is :)

You should add a tag stating what type of business this is. It looks like "office=advertising_agency" would fit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dadvertising_agency. (The "description" tag isn't enough for map software because it's free-form text).

Also, there are fields for your business's contact information, if you'd like to add it. In the editor sidebar, just go to "Add field" and you can add phone number, website, etc.

Everything else looks good. If you have further questions, I'd be glad to answer them--just reply to this changeset. Have a good day!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-15 03:42:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 92498790.
dbaron (2020-10-23 00:51:17+00:00): I fixed the use of multiple house numbers to use a semicolon instead of a comma in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92923040 .  This is the general syntax in OSM for multiple values.

However, it's best to avoid multiple values when possible.  Ideally, this would be best mapped as two separate address nodes corresponding to the entrances of the two units.  But lacking that level of detail, two housenumbers on the building is acceptable though not the preferred way of mapping.
geo_roads (2020-10-15 17:51:12+00:00): Hi kremlinkadet. Please do not add fake data to the map.
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:08:25+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

¿Estás seguro de que existe un lago en esa posición? Está cruzando una calle. Es importante capitalizar las palabras.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92500376