piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2020-02-04 17:47:49+00:00): Hi Gerd, Begründung dieses erneuten Reverts geht auf einen schlüssigen Einwand von @mapper999 zurück: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80445342
siehe auch mein Beitrag #9 in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=776066#p776066 
Ich bedauere die ausgelöste Verwirrung ;-)
camelCaseNick (2020-02-03 00:42:46+00:00): Hey,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/313467100 is definitely not where a city is. And isn't the city Puerto Cabello represented by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332585440?
CamelCaseNick
guildeur (2020-02-03 00:59:11+00:00): No idea where that node comes from. I was just checking the names.
Deleted by the way.
Glassman (2020-02-03 01:21:00+00:00): I'm curious why you removed the building tag from the structure. It can still be a building even if cars and trucks can drive inside. If you agree that it should be a building, can you add the tag back? Otherwise I'm interested in your logic. Thanks -
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80447943
mavl (2020-02-21 10:26:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
duustin (2021-12-18 02:26:45+00:00): Shouldn't this turn lane (https://ww.osm.org/way/294408376) be mapped using turn:lanes=* instead of a separate way?
duustin (2021-12-18 02:27:43+00:00): Sorry, typo: https://www.osm.org/way/294408376
pm360st (2021-12-18 18:54:38+00:00): duustin, sure, that sounds like a good change. Feel free to modify that.
ralley (2020-02-02 23:42:38+00:00): Wouldn't this be better tagged as "historic=archaeological_site", "site_type=military_trench" and "name=Pratt's Sap"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80448353
viloan (2020-02-02 22:55:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2020-02-03 23:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_3022894 (2020-02-16 15:31:19+00:00): Hi Imk,
thank you a lot for adding all these bus routes! I just wanted you to ask for not deleting highway=bus_stop, because it's not an obsolete tag. It's a tag you can use together with public_transport=platform wihout any problems I think, and for example people see the bus stops on OSM mainpage's public transport map then. So might it be possible not to delete it for compatibility? I know some people don't like to see it, but I think if public_transport=platform and highway=bus_stop are used on the same node, PTV and JOSM do not have any problems. Yours, Lukas
geri-oc (2020-02-17 18:21:12+00:00): highway=bus_stop (Dieses ältere Tag ist trotzdem notwendig, da sonst die Bushaltestelle momentan nicht auf der Hauptseite gerendert wird.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:public_transport
Vergeiche:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4836838141#map=21/51.01384/13.64701&layers=TN

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1248478029#map=20/51.31678/7.32601&layers=TN

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4836838141#map=20/51.01384/13.64701&layers=HN

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1248478029#map=20/51.31678/7.32601&layers=HN

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4836838141#map=19/51.01381/13.64701&layers=N

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1248478029#map=19/51.31678/7.32601&layers=N

Gruß Gerd
geri-oc (2020-02-17 18:33:10+00:00): Bitte vor weiteren Änderungen deine Meinung im Forum darlegen:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68685
Glassman (2020-02-03 01:24:14+00:00): The building should be part of the landuse. By making it a inner polygon, it is be excluded from the landuse. Can you fix it? let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80448641
indigomc (2020-02-20 20:37:18+00:00): The disputed Kalapani territory has at least one bad relationship. See note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2096182 and the border marked to its south and west which includes an orphan section of the Indian border. This should be corrected, but there are multiple relations here that I cannot work out. I have broken the border (split the way) at node 2995999958 to try to isolate the fault for now.
artem95vlasovets (2020-02-07 11:58:03+00:00): Hello. Why are you deletion these rivers? Do you have proof that they are missing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80448923
BCNorwich (2020-02-03 08:03:56+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to say foot use on a public bridleway is designated, so I've reversed your change.

As you've viewed the CC definitive map it would be very helpful to add the PRoW data.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-02-03 08:14:19+00:00): Hi, I joined the path to the road at each end.

Regards Bernard.
Dimacn (2020-02-05 11:51:09+00:00): Пожалуйста, передайте своему начальству, что все дома с адресами скопированными из кадастра или Росеестра будут удалены из этой карты в ближайшее время, т.к. такое копирование нарушает правила OpenStreetMap.
gscholz (2020-02-19 05:31:58+00:00): Hi Diego,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-63.99151&lat=-27.52249&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
LucFreitas (2020-02-03 02:25:41+00:00): Adicionada informação de elevação nos picos, de acordo com o GEOBASES
eggie (2020-02-03 07:12:56+00:00): Hoi.. Het is de realiteit dus lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
NotEs2 (2022-09-21 19:28:10+00:00): SR 1 has not yet moved to Rice Avenue, despite this being planned for quite some time. This edit should be reverted.
paul1928 (2020-05-09 09:28:23+00:00): Hey Yarilla. :) Where did the name "Cascade Track" come from? I can't see that on the Parks map. There's also a "Cascade Track" in the Silvan area of the park and it's unusual for Parks to re-use names.
The previous name "The Freeway" was just a colloquial name the local trail runner community used - so the "most commonly used name" I could find but certainly not an official one.
Yarilla (2020-06-01 04:58:48+00:00): Hi Paul - sorry I missed your comment, it did not show in my feed. The name "Cascade Track" was taken from the closed "Cascade Avenue" that was on this alignment. Reference is the gazetting of the road closure, refer Victorian Government Gazette G32 19 August 1992 page 2389. Not a particularly satisfactory name, probably best described as historical rather than official (or current). It can also be seen in old Melway maps (https://digitised-collections.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/23964/305364_UDS2013221-8-0093-wm.jpg?sequence=93&isAllowed=y).
user_5359 (2020-02-03 05:22:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Allison P (2020-02-04 17:33:37+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Please save your work by uploading the changeset before moving to a new area to avoid creating large changeset boundary boxes. This changeset covers a third of the Lower 48. It shows when looking at changesets in Wyoming, South Dakota, Iowa, and many other states even though changes were made in only Virginia and Washington. It makes it difficult to determine where edits have been made. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
akalohri (2020-02-05 03:31:45+00:00): Hi Allison,
Thanks for  your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved. However, as suggested by you I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.

Regards,
akalohri.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 17:23:05+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86091216
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 17:23:03+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86091216
chnav (2020-04-10 12:46:52+00:00): Рекламный мусор. Удалено повторно. В третий раз будет послан запрос на блокировку учетной записи.
Richard (2021-07-02 10:08:58+00:00): Hi - I think you added an erroneous 'access=private' to Troy Road in this changeset. I've fixed it but you might want to check your workflow for future edits.
cheers - Richard
sireeshp (2021-07-05 09:19:34+00:00): Hi, 

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.Apologies for the incorrect access tags, It is an honest mistake from my end. I will be extra cautious going forward. 
Thanks once again,Happy to learn from you!

Regards,
sireeshp
Richard (2021-07-05 09:20:57+00:00): Thank you :)
Allison P (2020-02-03 16:44:14+00:00): Highlands Elementary School is being renovated and the entire plot has been torn up, including the parking lot. This road no longer exists, and when the renovation is done the road will be located somewhere else. In addition, Mapbox Satellite imagery is out-of-date in Boise compared to the National Agricultural Imagery Program. NAIP imagery shows that the road has been torn up. I have removed the service road. Always ensure you are using the most recent imagery available when armchair mapping. Thank you!
kumartcx (2020-02-04 05:38:15+00:00): Hi Allison,
Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake, I will make sure not to repeat such errors again. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community and learn from them.
Regards,
kumartcx.
mavl (2020-02-23 05:14:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Johnny Carlsen (2020-12-24 03:30:10+00:00): Please keep the name tag for the name locally used.
aitolos (2020-05-05 16:36:26+00:00): Σχέση 6992427 είναι λάθος
aitolos (2020-05-05 16:42:46+00:00): Το ίδιο 5765839
aitolos (2020-05-05 16:44:54+00:00): Άλλη μια 5765846, Ονόματα δρόμων διόρθωνα, και βάρεσε καμπανάκι στον JOSM....
Projektcoach (2020-02-03 10:52:36+00:00): Hallo, der Übergang über die L609 bei der K3561 ist seit etwa einem Jahr anders. Hatte ich gerade erst korrigiert. Ich wohne da in der Nähe und kenne es. Bitte auch BING ansehen. Gruß Gerd
PT-53 (2020-02-03 11:43:27+00:00): Da war ein sich selbst überschneidender Weg, weshalb ich das dort nach ESRI überarbeitet habe. Bing zu sichten hatte ich vergessen, da diese ja noch oft total veraltet sind.
Sorry und Danke für den Hinweis und das wieder richtig stellen.
Grüße
Rogoyski (2021-03-04 08:44:07+00:00): Nie pierwszy raz Yanosik w ciemno aplikuje jakieś zgłoszenia użytkownika. Trochę wstyd jednak. Pomijając już, czy w ogóle ten budynek musi mieć nazwę, bo to właściwie nazwa szpitala.
Olga | Yanosik (2021-03-04 08:58:45+00:00): Dziękuję za informację, trochę długo ta nazwa wisiała i nikt nie zwrócił uwagi, że to nie ten szpital. Międzyleski jest przecież obok...
W każdym razie poprawione. 
Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 21:54:53+00:00): 124 / 5000
Translation results
Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769225618 est très, très petit - sûrement trop petit pour être une maison?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
Wisdom!! (2020-03-04 12:40:10+00:00): Hi hello,
I have changed the highway of kesempa mumbwa to secondary as it is more than 200 kms, do u agree with me?
Harel M (2020-09-05 12:26:41+00:00): היי, 
שים לב שלא נתת שם טוב למקום (הוא נלקח משם התמונה) ולכן השם נמחק ע"י עורך OSM אחר.
אני ממליץ להוסיף שם למקום ע"פ מה שידוע לך...
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-03-30 02:57:06+00:00): halo bangi. is this still construction? 5.5315132, 100.4299295  i don't have local knowledge. please fixing this crossing.
thank you
trial (2022-10-31 14:47:39+00:00): Bonjour, plusieurs problèmes par exemple ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769234015
– le numéro n’est pas le bon (sans doute un copier coller)
– toutes les informations d’adresse sont à supprimer (les adresses sont sur les points d’adresse en limite de propriété)
– la géométrie est incorrecte (utiliser le greffon cadastre sur JOSM, voir https://invidious.namazso.eu/watch?v=P_CyfGD3B3w, c'est beaucoup plus efficace)
J’ai fait le ménage sur cette rue, bonne continuation ;-).
Gustavo22Soares (2020-02-06 20:43:12+00:00): Oi querida, dividiu o rio pq???
Pennines (2020-02-07 00:38:39+00:00): Thanks for commenting. I’m not sure what you mean, I haven’t touched the river. Can you clarify?
532910 (2020-04-07 23:33:17+00:00): Уважаемый, будьте так добры читать что написано на по ссылкам который сами же и приводите:
https://гибдд.рф/milestones/2866813/
"Передвижной,в зависимости от оперативной обстановки"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6904002200

Читайте вики:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera:
Стационарная видеокамера для замера скорости транспортного средства

Будте добры удалить.
532910 (2020-04-07 23:40:06+00:00): Не в тот ченжсет написал, но добавили её вы.
Будте добры заодно проверить отсальные подобные ваши косяки.
RusFox (2020-04-08 05:34:08+00:00): Скажите, а кто решает, через какое время нахождения на одном месте, камера становится статической? На дамбе стоят передвижные камеры, которые не меняли свое положение несколько лет.

Я периодически отслеживаю перемещение камер, иногда делаю запросы в ГИБДД, если камера вызывает подозрения.

Присоединяйтесь, я вот тут сделал инструмент для этого https://speedcammapping.lisss.website/
532910 (2020-04-08 07:16:01+00:00): Решает вики, не путайте мягкое с тёплым: не статической а стационарнаой.

Читайте вики:
Данный тег следует применять только для радаров, измеряющих скорость "в лоб". Для других камер следует использовать отношение enforcement:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:enforcement
Это отношение обозначает различные типы устройств, которые измеряют и фиксируют нарушения ПДД, такие как: Обычные места "засады" сотрудников ГИБД (радар, проверка документов, и др)
RusFox (2020-04-08 08:18:50+00:00): В этом месте и так стоит радар, измеряющий скорость в лоб, закреплен на опоре.  Я не понимаю, к чему вы ведете.
532910 (2020-04-08 08:32:57+00:00): Это ложь!
RusFox (2020-04-08 08:39:49+00:00): Ну так сделайте обращение в ГИБДД, исправьте данные в осм. Я что должен сделать? Удалить точку с комментариями "Один пользователь сказал, что это ложь"? Я отметил точку, указал источник. Если вы не согласны, исправьте. Так ОСМ и работает.
532910 (2020-04-08 09:40:00+00:00): В ГИБДД всё верно написано:
"Передвижной,в зависимости от оперативной обстановки"

Будте добры исправить ваши правки что бы не пришлось поднимать диспут.
RusFox (2020-04-08 09:46:05+00:00): Вам не кажется странной ваша позиция: "Не нужно верить информации ГИБДД о положении камеры, потому что надо верить информации ГИБДД о типе камеры"? Думаю, Если вы откроете диспут, к вам возникнет именно этот вопрос.
RusFox (2020-04-08 09:49:06+00:00): У меня есть та информация, которая указана в источнике. Если у вас есть другая информация, сделайте правку и укажите источник. Что за странная позиция: "а ну быстро исправляйте, потому что я так сказал"? Больше дискуссию я с вами поддерживать не хочу и не буду.
532910 (2020-04-08 09:51:22+00:00): Вам не кажется странным, что вы перевираете мои слова и я НИ разу не говорил вам, "Не нужно верить информации ГИБДД о положении камеры".
532910 (2020-04-08 09:58:21+00:00): Будте добры, читайте что вам пишут, а то, что вам хочется читать: не  "а ну быстро исправляйте, потому что я так сказал", а "информация в источнике не соотвествует вашей".
kartonage (2020-02-05 17:30:25+00:00): Hej cartorhythm, 

I would argue that the classification for highways as classified by the Road Development Authority, in this case "B16", should be somewhat used as a guideline to ascertain the OSM classification on Mauritius. B16 (and B15 aswell) don't seem to fit into the general idea of primary highways linking larger towns together. Granted some of the highways with an A ref seem to overshoot their destination and we're talking about small differences in traffic and regional significance only, which is why I'm somewhat in favor for going by already existing classification that can be easily referenced by source. And I think the RDA classifications fits most of the time. Unless you have a strong position why this would definitely be a primary of course. Let me know what you think, so far there hasn't been any documentation for MU in general, so it's nothing carved in stone but something that has clearly developed over time and is now usually the case on MU.

Best regards
cartorhythm (2020-02-06 03:02:29+00:00): Hi kartonage, thanks for letting me know about the RDA classifications! I see how it is easier to agree on classifications when everyone is following a single source. I just don’t think that the government classification will always match the overall road importance, which the wiki says OSM classification should be based off of: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway. To me it seemed like the B16 links larger towns just as much as the A5 or the B15. You have more local background than me so I would not be opposed if you changed it back to secondary. Again, thanks for reaching out.
kartonage (2020-02-13 08:46:37+00:00): The thing is, there are no larger towns linked here. Poudre d'Or & Hamlet are small villages of 4k inhabitants. 
Like i said, the B15 is also probably misjudged. Secondary roads connecting primary A5 and A6 but not leading to much bigger towns or junctions. That's not really a high importance for the region.

If B16 is a primary, almost all linking roads between villages/hamlets can be on Mauritius. That's not really helpful I would argue. There's actually more a case for classifying down in some places.
cartorhythm (2020-02-15 01:32:41+00:00): I see your point about the B16 and have changed it back to secondary. Since there doesn’t seem to be an agreed upon classification scheme in Mauritius I’m going to avoid changing classifications here.
JezCrow (2020-02-04 00:12:38+00:00): Hi Rootmtoot, thank you for updating the information on the garden centre. FYI, OpenStreetMap has a guideline "One feature, one OSM element" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
You've added a duplicate point in addition to updating the building, but with different opening hours, and I don't know which is correct. Hopefully you'll be able to advise.
Happy mapping :)
Jez
Rootmtoot (2020-02-06 04:39:41+00:00): Hi Jez,
Sorry I must have mistyped, the correct hours are Monday-Saturday 9.00-5.00, Sunday 10.30-4.30pm. I’d update it myself but I can’t get to my laptop for few days.
Cheerio,
Rootmtoot
JezCrow (2020-02-06 17:39:12+00:00): Hi Rootmtoot,
Excellent, thank you. I've updated the info and removed the duplicate point in changeset 80654774.
Jez
VA00 (2020-03-23 06:14:48+00:00): Co to jest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769244792

Poręba czy szkółka leśna? Bo na las nie wygląda.
m_p_13 (2020-03-23 07:42:13+00:00): Młodnik 3+4 lata, mieszany , sosna i brzoza w pasach o szerokości 15 metrów.
VA00 (2020-03-23 13:43:38+00:00): Ustawiłem na plant_nursery i wyodrębniłem. Jest ogrodzenie?
m_p_13 (2020-03-24 04:52:50+00:00): Nie ma ogrodzenia. Teren wygląda tak, jakby był tam już jeden młodnik, który został wycięty. Pnie mają do 8÷12cm średnicy. Na to posadzono kolejny młodnik, tym razem mieszany. Ktoś uparcie chce zalesić pustynię, a ta złośliwie nie chce się poddać...
AdVerburg (2020-02-16 07:42:13+00:00): Dag Daniël,
Volgens de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket#Tags hoort de aansluitwaarde "socket:<type>:output=	Power in kilowatts, numeric. " te zijn. Dus zonder "kW".
Ook volgens de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#Vehicles is het "motorcar=yes", dus niet "car=yes".
Grote, Ad
SproutScout (2020-02-17 08:09:14+00:00): Hoi Ad,

Bedankt voor de feedback!
Ik heb de tags van alle door mij toegevoegde charging stations aangepast naar het juiste format.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81100772

Mvg,
Daniël
ma-rt-in (2020-02-04 21:10:16+00:00): Hallo,
bitte verwende doch die Kommentarfunktion!
Des Weiteren sollte bei nutzung von construction=* auch entsprechend highway=construction verwendet werden.
vg
YjM (2020-05-02 13:44:01+00:00): Ahoj, co třeba local knowledge? Po spoustě těch cest nově označených jako "track" je boj projet i na kole...
Jvitegem (2020-04-08 08:24:28+00:00): Beste 
Waarom plaats u dit gebouw weer terug.
Dit gebouw is 5 jaar geleden gesloopt een staat NIET in de BAG.
Er zijn wel plannen voor een wijk hier maar die staan nog niet in de BAG
de vries (2020-04-08 19:20:18+00:00): Bedankt voor het melden. Dit pand heeft waarschijnlijk (korte tijd) onterecht als 'in gebruik' in de bag gestaan. Inmiddels heeft het daar ook de status 'gesloopt'. Zie: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=0848100000008813&geometry.x=161789.2084&geometry.y=392575.0422&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0848100000008813&detailsObjectId=0848010000006580
Ik heb het pand weer van osm verwijderd.
Mvg
VictorIE (2020-02-08 21:45:12+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7180933273

I'm not seeing anything here. Is it new?
NoelB (2020-02-08 21:51:17+00:00): it is a mistake, I have deleted it. Thanks