piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adamant1 (2019-11-15 21:25:29+00:00): Btw, since you clearly have a vast and superior understanding of everything related to OSM, you would know that the purpose of outside, imported GIS data isn't to use in perpetuity to quell your neurosis by reseting the map to how you like it. For all you know I might have been planning on mapping the grass area in the park more accurately or whatever. It shouldn't though, because ultimately the only allowed use case for imports in OSM is by creating a wiki page and going through the proper channels first. They aren't meant to be used for  "hey I don't like this so I'll push a button in JOSM" purposes. Which is clearly what you did here. And, obviously, people are going to come along after the data is intially importated to modify and improve it. The solution to that should never be to send those people angry messages or to revert them with the exact same data they are attempting to improve. Which you don't have premission to use anymore.
goedegazelle (2019-11-15 22:05:28+00:00): Adding insult to injury does not make it look any better, Adament1. You removed data without any knowledge of the area, without any reliable source and without any discussion. The reversion was justified and I am glad that it happened.
Adamant1 (2019-11-15 22:20:41+00:00): goedegazelle, good for you. I don't care if your glad the revert happened. The OSM rules, what constutes a valid edit, or when to revert someone isn't based on our feelings. If you have a an actual reason why you think the revert was justified go ahead and give it. Otherwise, don't leave, useless, vapid responses to valid, rule based, criticisms of another person actions. Its just not helpful. 
Again, what exactly was "serious damage" about deleting a grass area that I was planning to remap more accurately? Also, how is not allowing me to respond first before reverting me and doing it by importing data you don't have promission to import in thid sitituation the "justified" and proper way to handle things? What's "better" about re-importing inaccurate data just to stick it to someone versus leaving giving them a chance to map the area better then the imported data would be?
Adamant1 (2019-11-16 06:55:03+00:00): Also Geodegazelle, show me any where that says satellite images aren't a usable source, that people have to discuss things before editing them, or that they are required to have local knowledge? dvdhoven didn't even revert me based on local knowledge anyway. Otherwise he would have done it by hand off of memory instead of a using a GIS file. GIS files aren't "local." They don't meet the verifiability standards either. Whereas, satellite images do. Exactly squat that you or him has said justifies the way either one of you have acted or him reverting me. 

Otherwise, back your nonsense up with some actual valid evidence and quote some OSM guidelines along with it. I doubt you can. Show me anywhere that says I can't delete inaccurate grassy areas so they can be remap more accurately, that I need to be "local" to do it, or that I can't use satellite images in the process. Good luck.
mueschel (2019-11-19 12:43:40+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

Your added nodes only have only tags that are not used in any other place and can't be used for maps.

Jan
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
rik_ (2020-06-02 18:41:56+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Changeset den `track` an der westlichen Grundstücksgrenze des „Haus des Waldes“ in einen `path` geändert.

Es handelt sich allerdings eindeutig um einen `track`, gut z. B. hier zu sehen: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/2mOzy-VLC3FeX6fmxIqsmQ

Ich werde das `highway`-Tag wieder auf `track` ändern - wenn du keinen Einwand hast.

Viele Grüße

rik
Osmegnos (2020-06-03 07:06:24+00:00): Hallo rik,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe in track zurück geändert.
VG
viloan (2019-11-15 08:20:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
lutz (2020-02-08 18:55:13+00:00): Hallo h-jo,
deine Änderungen diverser Meilensteine grenzen stark an Vandalismus.
historic=milestone ist ein anerkanntes key/value. Es besteht kein Grund daraus historische Steine, Denkmale oder gar einen Bildstock daraus zu machen. Wenn du Validator-Meldungen nicht verstehst, dann ignoriere die Bitte in Zukunft.

Grüße von Lutz
M!dgard (2020-01-08 19:06:16+00:00): Hoi

Je hebt een aantal "fixme vóór uploaden" laten staan:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745623038 (verdieping)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745623093 (verdieping)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745623005 (verdieping)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745623015 (mast)

Gelieve bij te werken:

* building=verdieping wordt in veel gevallen
building:part=yes
building:min_level=1
Je kunt nagaan met foto.

* De man_made=mast die je toevoegt moet gewoon verwijderd worden: die hoogspanningsmast staat al in OSM. Hoogspanningsmasten mappen we als node en dat is genoeg.

Zoals je weet, is OSM geen dumpplaats voor data uit andere databases. Als GRB-importeur ben je dan ook verantwoordelijk de data op te kuisen voor je ze naar OSM uploadt. Gelieve in de toekomst elk object te inspecteren, waardoor je deze zaken kunt vermijden.

Met de GRB-stijl voor JOSM wordt dat eenvoudiger.
M!dgard (2020-01-08 18:58:30+00:00): Hoi

Je hebt een "fixme vóór uploaden" laten staan:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745624818

Gelieve bij te werken
Chris Fleming (2019-11-18 13:23:12+00:00): For now I would add the number of disabled parking spaces to the main car park as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

Adding the actual location as you have done may also be useful, though i'm not sure if anyone is using this at the moment.
Roadsguy (2019-12-07 01:36:18+00:00): US 74 is not a motorway here. The motorway class in the U.S. is used exclusively for controlled-access freeways, which US 74 is not. Though all the median crossings along this stretch were removed and replaced with interchanges, there are still numerous driveways and side streets, disqualifying this stretch from being considered a freeway.
Peter Elderson (2019-11-15 09:06:44+00:00): Hoi dvdhoven wij zijn tegelijk in dit netwerk bezig, dat geeft konflikten! Kunnn we dit afstemmen?
dvdhoven (2019-11-15 14:57:31+00:00): Ik las dit net voor ik weg ging.
Ik hoop dat je inmiddels verder hebt kunnen werken
Peter Elderson (2019-11-15 15:19:30+00:00): Ik heb verder kunnen werken. Hopelijk heb ik niet jouw werk verknald! Ik snap die konfliktoplosser nog steeds niet goed.
mavl (2019-11-15 16:58:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты. Вы используете не совсем правильные статусы дорог.  
Есть подробное описание:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
compdude (2019-11-19 03:59:33+00:00): This road should not be tagged as a motorway due to the presence of at grade right-in, right-out (RIRO) intersections. Typically, RIRO expressways like this one are not tagged as motorway in the US. 

Please change it back to how it was before. Thanks!
mavl (2019-11-15 17:00:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет на карту гараж с название "Гараж". "Гараж" - это не название, а тип объекта. Его не следует указывать в качестве названия.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
mavl (2019-11-15 17:02:01+00:00): Ещё. Здание гаража получилось непрямоугольным. Чтобы сделать здание прямоугольным в редакторе iD (которым вы пользовались) есть команда "Сделать углы прямыми" (или клавиша S для выделенного объекта)
czubi (2019-11-15 15:27:20+00:00): Wenn du Gebäude löschst die auf dem Luftbild noch da sind benutze besser die lifecycle Präfixe. Sonst macht sie irgend jemand wieder hin und deine schöne Arbeit war umsonst.
hier-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Also razed:building= *
Dann wirds auch nicht merh gerendet
Jakka (2019-11-16 09:19:35+00:00): is deze oprit privé, Dan heeft deze waarschijnlijk geen naam en zeker geen nummer. Routeplanners zullen 113 vinden door huisnummer.
iandees (2019-11-15 13:20:10+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77113823
pfg21 (2019-11-21 06:44:57+00:00): на будущее если будет желание впихивать в осм объектов которые не существует в реальности, то делай это правильно.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=proposed?uselang=ru
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560098629
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365100161
iandees (2019-11-15 13:20:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77114020
abakus_uploader (2019-11-15 23:31:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
compdude (2019-11-23 17:06:30+00:00): Independence Boulevard should not be considered a motorway east of the interchange with Briar Creek Road because of its at-grade intersections. Please change it back to trunk. Thanks!
iandees (2019-11-15 13:20:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77114336
Jakka (2019-11-16 09:24:56+00:00): Merci voor aanbrengen van de opmerking, maar dit zal op een andere manier moeten gebeuren zodat routeplanner dat kunnen detecteren. Met wat is deze  weg afgesloten. Tijdelijk of definitief en alle verkeer te voet fiets snorfiets enz... ook graag een antwoordje.
gsleurs (2019-11-19 13:47:22+00:00): Mijn excuses. Ik heb me vergist. De knip ligt verder, voorbij de Leukenstraat, en ik zag vandaag pas dat dit al in jullie kaarten verwerkt is.
Jakka (2019-11-19 13:49:48+00:00): geen probleem vergissing verwijderd bedankt voor de update
MikeN (2019-11-15 12:40:05+00:00): Your vandalism deleted sequential OSM ID node numbers
iandees (2019-11-15 13:20:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77114678
chnav (2019-11-17 13:25:13+00:00): Правка частично откачена, восстановлены удалённые здания.
ndm (2019-11-16 00:00:07+00:00): I've reverted these turn restrictions -- there is no evidence on Bing Streetside.
dvvuyyur (2019-11-19 01:54:12+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Added turn restrictions as the new added road goes over the legal median as per the OSM Wiki (https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html). Please let me know if anythings needs to be changed. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
dvvuyyur.
ndm (2019-11-19 20:13:54+00:00): I think you need to understand that you can cross a painted meridian to turn -- if you are careful https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html#

Please don't add any turn restrictions that conflict with the highway code.
named_after_GZ (2019-11-15 10:41:08+00:00): Hi Salkyn! Good to know: To make buildings rectangular, pick one and press Q on your keyboard.

Салам, Салкин! Бул билүү үчүн пайдалуу: тик бурчтуу имарат үчүн, тергич боюнча бир жана "Q" чыкылдатуу тандоо.
chnav (2019-11-25 14:02:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не пишите описание объектов в поле name, у нас не Викимапия.  

Все бесполезные названия вычищены.
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
iandees (2019-11-15 13:20:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77115737
Warin61 (2019-11-24 22:19:16+00:00): Reverted admin boundaries ... 20 minutes. This reversion has caused problems... and will require yet more work to repair.
Warin61 (2019-11-25 00:00:21+00:00): Finished corrections to the reversions for admin boundaries.. there may be more errors following these reversions but it will take some time for these to surface. 

The existing admin boundaries come from the ABS 2011 ... 
Please read 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue 
Note colours

red .. rejected OSM approach to use!

green - accepted OSM use

Yellow - They have been approached - but no result as yet = do not use. 

-------------------------
Creative commons .. do not use! 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

In short .. don't use any information other that that in the overlays provided by OSM. If you contemplate it then look at their copyright .. contact an OSM person about it.. before you start to use it.
Vimako (2019-11-16 12:09:47+00:00): рекламная мастерская
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
Jakka (2019-11-16 09:45:54+00:00): Het was onnodig deze oprit te verwijderen, stond ingevoerd als privé. Is een herkenningspunt als je de Vengerstraat gebruikt om je te orienteren. deze code stond erin "highway"="service"
    "service"="driveway"
    "access"="private"
Zabir91 (2019-11-16 05:59:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.
You should add meaningful description to change set description. 'edit' describe nothing.

Like you can describe the reason for deleting the [way 729873934](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729873934)
Jbah (2024-02-11 11:06:46+00:00): Moin, finde den relevanten code in streetcomplete nicht, weshalb es schon wieder draussen ist, aber wuerde es nicht mehr Sinn machen, hier fee und fee:conditional zu flippen? Meistens muss man Zahlen, zu gewissen Uhrzeiten nicht?
osm tileserver rendered fee=yes nicht anders, andere software unterstuetzt fee:conditional moeglicherweise nicht.
(Eigentliche Problem ist natuerlich, dass OSMAnd fee:conditional (noch) nicht unterstuetzt: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/14659 )
Huck-Finn (2024-02-12 11:36:17+00:00): Salü Jbah

Ich mag mich an keinen bestimmten Grund erinnern, warum ich es so eingtragen habe. 
Ist bei vielen Parkplätzen in Thusis so, dass parkieren in der Nacht gratis ist, tagsüber muss man zahlen.
Mach du so, wie es nach BestPractice sein sollte.
Zabir91 (2019-11-16 06:01:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.
You should add meaningful description to change set description. 'edit' describe nothing.

Also you have removed the English name while adding the bangle name. You shouldn't remove the English name, rather you should put that in name:en tag. Best is keeping tagging like this: 
name=bangla name
name:bn=same as name
name:en=english name
please fix those.
Sawan Shariar (2019-11-18 09:38:25+00:00): Dear @স্বপ্ন নীল সৈকত, judging from you profile, it seems that you are very new to OSM. So, at first I would like you welcome you to OSM. I agree with @Zabir91, that changeset comments should be meaningful describing what you have changed. For example, If you add road, it should say 'add road in area X'. Apart from that we follow a certain tagging style in Bangladesh to maintain a standard. In this changeset you have changed the name to English to Bengali. We the community of Bangladesh are still in the process of deciding what should we do. Traditionally, for last 4 years we have added name in English. So until it is decided otherwise I would like to request you to add the names in English. To know more about the community in Bangladesh, join the mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-bd and the Facebook Group: https://facebook.com/groups/OSMBD/. You can also join the Telegram group for casual chat or tagging related help at: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapBD

Dear @Zabir91 please don't spread misinformation. This is not yet decided that we would add Bengali in name tag. We have already invited you to take part in mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-bd/2019-November/000151.html. So put forward your informed opinion there. When we all come to an agreement that name would be in Bengali, it would be put on the Wiki. Please don't misguide the newbies. Consider this as a last warning or else we would ask the Data Working Group to block your ID.
PT-53 (2019-11-15 16:27:37+00:00): Hallo  m_p_13,
im Änderungssatz-Kommentar sollte kurz beschrieben werden, was wo gemacht wurde. Außerdem sollte als Quelle / Soure angegeben werden, woher das Wissen über die Änderungen kommt. "eigene Beobachtungen" wären demnach die Quelle und nicht die Beschreibung, was wo gemacht wurde.
Grüße
Russ McD (2021-05-11 09:12:20+00:00): Confused about this addition/fixme relating to Way: 103363796 ..
Is it really a boardwalk over the fields? .. seems a long way if so, and the aerials dont support it.
And whats a "dummy relation" ?.. if its a genuine path, which old maps seem to support, leave as a highway=path.
Would like to close the fixme, but a bit confused as what is meant. 
Cheers.
Cebderby (2021-05-12 12:54:08+00:00): Russ,
I note the fixme was present on the first version of this way added ~10yr ago, maybe the shape of the way was then a rough guess and added to join up the relation route.
I also note this changeset was the 1st (and only) edit by this editor, and used ID and has a resolved:crossing_ways:highway-waterway flag set.  So I would guess the user added bridge to the path because ID told them it was a solution to the way crossing the stream.
Suggest to remove the false/unnecessary tags, divide it at the farm and just have simple highway=footway and =track
Cebderby (Clive)
Russ McD (2021-05-13 09:53:20+00:00): Cheers Clive,   I have adjusted to make sense.  Thanks for the reply, Best, Russ.
A67-A67 (2019-11-15 12:53:16+00:00): Hallo Dave009,

Volgens de gemeente Hoekse Waard heet de sporthal nog steeds Sporthal Cromstrijen, ook al bestaat Cromstrijen niet meer als gemeente. 

https://www.gemeentehw.nl/inwoner-bezoeker/sporthallen-en-zalen_47771/
Davy_670 (2019-11-15 13:23:06+00:00): Hallo A67-A67,

Ik zie het inderdaad! vreemd :) ik heb hem aangepast met ID 77128451
A67-A67 (2019-11-15 16:11:06+00:00): Bedankt! Misschien wordt de naam verder in de toekomst nog wel een keer aangepast.
GeorgeKaplan (2026-06-09 04:39:08+00:00): Vous avez créé un supermarché https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6979416223 dans ce lieu de culte bouddhiste. Est-ce que c'est un supermarché comme un Carrefour ou Leclerc ou plutôt une épicerie, ou boutique de souvenirs ? Est-ce ouvert à n'importe qui ?
rskedgell (2019-11-15 13:52:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating OSM.

While adding service=driveway and access=private is correct, unfortunately deleting the highway=service tag is unhelpful as service=driveway does not make sense on its own.

There are more details in the wiki at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
rskedgell (2019-11-19 14:07:55+00:00): I have reinstated highway=service to these driveways (retaining service=driveway + access=private) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77277764
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-11-15 14:33:52+00:00): Boa tarde, qual o motivo para ter eliminado elementos do mapa e ter colocado a descrição "experiment". Aguardo justificação.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
4004 (2019-11-17 22:29:50+00:00): здравствуйте, и спасибо за правку.
общежитие это все же dormitory
emvee (2022-05-15 20:16:12+00:00): Hi Princeps,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10300222
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10313976

I like to update (Я люблю обновляться:)

day_off=monday;friday
day_on=thursday;sunday
hour_off=14:00
hour_on=08:00

to:

restriction=conditional = no_entry @ (Mo-Th;Fr-Su 08:00-14:00)

is that the correct translation? (это правильный перевод?)

Greetings (Приветствую!)
sak3112 (2019-11-15 22:18:49+00:00): The changes made to Derbyshire Constabulary and Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service HQ are incorrect. The buildings shown on the Bing aerial imagery layer have been demolished and rebuilt on a new footprint
DHP11 MDS (2019-11-18 10:18:53+00:00): I'll rectify that as soon as I am able
DAI (2020-01-05 10:52:10+00:00): This change merges two segments of Rue Mérlival (511721930 and 294069372), However only 511721930 was part of relation Chemin de Sainte-Foy-la-Grande à Saint-Paul-sur-Ubaye (7414123). Reverted this to fix relation.
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
named_after_GZ (2019-11-23 17:03:06+00:00): Hi Umar, it's good to know that "motorway" stands for a wide speedy road (Автомагистраль). Look at the wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled-access_highway

Салам Умар, койсо жакшы "motorway" бир тез арада жол (Автомагистраль) көрөрүн билүү. Уикидеги карагылачы: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled-access_highway.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].