piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:17:45+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-18 04:20:29+00:00): Hi, I've reverted the changes in Caddens as:
1. a survey 10 days ago revealed the roads are still closed
2. you deleted the existing ways instead of updating the tags and preserving the history
3. there was no source listed so this appears to be an armchair edit

If this is incorrect then I'm open to discussion.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:19:50+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
ivanbranco (2022-02-14 09:26:43+00:00): Hi martinannga,

what's the meaning of place=RW? Is used here only
Kovoschiz (2020-08-18 05:35:09+00:00): Please don't remove `crossing:island=` and `traffic_signals=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89545190
Kovoschiz (2020-08-18 05:36:27+00:00): Please don't duplicate `highway=bus_stop` on `public_transport=stop_position`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89545190
Kovoschiz (2020-08-18 05:37:31+00:00): Please don't add non-directly associated info to the `public_transport=stop_position`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89545190
5m4u9 (2020-08-19 04:59:07+00:00): gracias por añadir, era necesario
IgorEliezer (2020-08-27 14:55:02+00:00): Hello,
This region was mapped with Bing image, while Maxar has an offset of 7 meters WNW. When editing with Maxar image, please displace it to align with the ways mapped with Bing, or we'll have situations like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-23.66459/-46.49074
Thanks
IgorEliezer (2020-08-27 14:56:11+00:00): I mean, "7 meters NNW".
Weisshorn (2020-08-27 21:28:05+00:00): Hi IgorEliezer, Thanks for in forming me of the offset in Maxar. I saw that it is similar to Bing but much clearer. I will create a Maxar offset based on Strava, OSM-traces and referencing Bing as the most aligned, then make sure all the data is set to that. Thank you.
jleedev (2020-08-18 14:08:20+00:00): Please try to use changeset descriptions that have at least a little bit to do with what it is you're mapping.
user_8466505 (2020-08-18 16:30:18+00:00): Noted. Will do!

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
Wright One (2020-08-18 14:50:37+00:00): 你應該不慎把5個節點移錯位置了

我已在以下變更集中解決:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89581811
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:44:10+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:43:52+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Supaplex (2020-08-18 14:43:38+00:00): 不好意思，員林市已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3329736
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:20:17+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:43:00+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
JodaStephen (2020-08-19 15:34:37+00:00): Hi! I note that you are using Bing imagery and the iD editor. Unfortunately, the lovely new Bing imagery is inconsistent with previous imagery and also with reality. A such, realigning roads like this is tending to make things worse not better wrt the real world. In the area New Malden / Wimbledon / Morden I'm encouraging mappers to use an offset of (3.43,-1.03) which can be manually set in the iD editor. If you were to use JOSM, the offset can be applied more automatically. Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89549551
amanura (2020-08-24 08:33:50+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. We have reverted the changeset and made the necessary changes. Thanks for the heads up. I will make sure to check the entire vicinity for the offset before making the edits. Always happy to learn from the community
Regards
Amanura
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:40:33+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:41:14+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:41:40+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:42:07+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
gurglypipe (2020-08-18 10:34:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution to OSM. I can’t find any references to this waterfall on other maps, and don’t know of it from my walks locally. I’m not sure it exists. Can you please provide some contextual information about it? In particular, where does the name come from? Thanks.
Flazinho (2020-08-21 06:32:19+00:00): ﻿Hi,

I have some photos I could send with more evidence of the waterfall and the location using iPhone GPS coordinates

As for the name, as we couldn’t find it on any maps we have named it ourselves, MarVan

I look forward to hearing from you 

Mark
Flazinho (2020-08-21 06:35:23+00:00): is there an email address you could provide?
gurglypipe (2020-08-21 10:39:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for responding! :)

You could upload photos of the waterfall somewhere (https://www.geograph.org.uk/ is good), that would be helpful.

If you’ve named it yourself then the name can’t go into OpenStreetMap, as it’s not meaningful to anyone else, and can’t be verified later (by looking at a signpost, for example). See here for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability

The waterfall itself, as a physical feature, can definitely be mapped.
olehz (2021-06-15 18:38:52+00:00): thanks for the shitty job
Cucazer (2020-08-18 11:18:19+00:00): Это неверное смещение парковки, старое было правильным. Причина в том, что спутниковые снимки Bing имеют небольшой сдвиг и изначально координаты точки карты OSM и её отображение на этих спутниковых картах не совпадают.
В этом плане лучше спутниковые снимки Esri - поставьте их и убедитесь, что ваши правки по сдвигам были откачены как раз к этим снимкам.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89556194
habi (2020-08-18 13:32:43+00:00): Hey!
In this changeset you added buildings (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838081830) on top of other buildings (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837932219) that you added 15 hours earlier.
Please don't do that.
habi (2020-08-18 13:34:07+00:00): And it would be *very* beneficial if you "use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners" "After drawing the outline and tagging as a building" as it's written in the instructions at https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/8823/tasks/
Have a good day!
Polarbear (2020-11-01 17:51:36+00:00): Hier hast du neben anderen Zufahrten die der Feuerwehr gelöscht!
Nichts "ergänzt", gar nichts!
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-01 22:16:58+00:00): Woanders legst du strassenbegeleitende Fusswege an, hier löschst du hingegen den Eingangsweg in eine Kirche. Warum?
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-01 22:21:09+00:00): reverted in CS 93384104: 
DE: Schöneiche: cumulative revert of malicious deletion/shortening of driveways
Frans S (2020-08-18 08:16:26+00:00): Subject: Hidden already mapped buildings in iDeditor

Hello. Thank you for mapping out this project.
Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ... If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.

See this picture
![hidden features] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoGFziHyq49yKKqKbu81mefyBQZ6TqPH/view?usp=sharing)
Frans S (2020-08-18 08:20:51+00:00): addition
You mapped quite a lot of buildings which are now duplicated. I will remove them
Another point. Dspite the image is not to clear you identify the buildings 
You can switch to MAXAR Prermium, which has a much better view, Correct the offset to the project imagery

Here is a document which might be helpful
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
jcr83 (2022-02-13 17:35:32+00:00): What are these government offices?
jcr83 (2022-09-01 14:13:48+00:00): Did you receive my question?
user_5239402 (2020-08-18 10:49:36+00:00): 이름칸에 "주택" 이란 이름을 쓰면 안됩니다
user_5239402 (2020-08-18 10:50:52+00:00): 이렇게 사적인 내용은 지도에 표기할 필요 없습니다 이렇게 표기하면 지도의 가치가 없거든요
trigpoint (2021-04-24 20:55:15+00:00): Hi, the source you have used seems very odd. Why would Cardiff City Council have a road closure here?

What other evidence is there to suggest this road is closed for construction?

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2021-04-27 15:13:23+00:00): I would imagine the road closure the document is referring to is hereabouts in Cardiff.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13412838#map=17/51.52815/-3.13412
mundlk (2021-04-27 16:16:12+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for your review and comment. We have made the changes based on our delivery partners feedback and the one.network resource (https://snipboard.io/XOcbmB.jpg). By mistake I copied a wrong datasource link into my changeset comment. When the edit was made, there was no clear mention of the closure timelines so I left the road as construction. But, with your inputs we have re-visited the case and it looks like the road construction is complete and it is servicible now. I have made the changes in the following changeset: 103718730

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.
trigpoint (2021-04-28 12:55:51+00:00): Thank you however the picture you have now shared is just for roadworks and possible delays. It says nothing about a road closure.

Mapping roadworks such as this in the OSM database is not a bad idea. Often they fail to be removed, as as happened in this case and therefore has been directing everyone the long way for over 6 months.

Apps tend to update map data periodically, monthly at best although many are far less frequent and this sort of edit should be avoided. 

The OSM database is really not the place for such data.

Cheers Phil
mundlk (2021-04-28 14:23:45+00:00): Hi,
Thanks Trigpoint for sharing your thoughts. Back then multiple of our delivery partners were blocked to travel through this road completely. Hence made the changes considering the local inputs. But I do find your inputs valid as we can see in the following case. Unless we have a clear road closure and opening date information, going forward I will avoid adding construction tags. I will pass on the information to my larger team as well. Thanks again for looking into my miss and helping me learn from my mistakes.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-18 08:09:47+00:00): Changesets reverted: 89547291, 89547219, 89547119, 89547009, 89546947, 89546740, 89546619, 89546467, 89546339, 89546258, 89546223, 89545787, 89545736, 89545697, 89545624, 89545559, 89544453, 89544366, 89544335, 89544289, 89544238, 89544200, 89543385, 89543326, 89543264, 89543162, 89543120, 89543105, 89543001, 89542981, 89542939, 89542902, 89542849, 89542811, 89542415, 89542362, 89542310, 89541717, 89541668, 89541613, 89541567, 89541515, 89541486, 89541397, 89541359, 89541316, 89541240, 89541182, 89541150, 89541122, 89541106, 89541091, 89541072, 89539828, 89539594, 89539499, 89539353, 89495429, 89495220, 89495068, 89494928, 89494711, 89494517, 89494402, 89494225, 89494055, 89493920, 89493720, 89493519, 89493307, 89493112, 89493038, 89492867, 89492709, 89492453, 89488892, 89488839, 89488809, 89488729, 89488618, 89488551, 89488480, 89488412, 89488185, 89488076, 89488053, 89487982, 89487944, 89487883, 89487339, 89487298, 89487189, 89487150, 89487094, 89487052, 89487011, 89486934, 89486862, 89486801, 89486271, 89486180, 89486146, 89486113, 89486050, 89486000, 89485949, 89485874, 89485846, 89485811, 89485461, 89485423, 89485369, 89485307, 89485280, 89485220, 89485192, 89485155, 89485121, 89381972, 89381918, 89381860, 89381782, 89381644, 89381567, 89381542, 89381447, 89381423, 89381397, 89381325, 89381289, 89381226, 89381172, 89381155, 89381128, 89381061, 89381022, 89380999, 89380968, 89380935, 89380890, 89380864, 89380823, 89380799, 89380767, 89380713, 89380677, 89380633, 89380544, 89380416, 89380391, 89380354, 89380304, 89380270, 89380220, 89380186, 89380136, 89380108, 89380061, 89379998, 89379964, 89379935, 89379893, 89379232, 89379191, 89379120, 89379101, 89379078, 89379035, 89379005, 89378998, 89378932, 89378909, 89378862, 89378812, 89378771, 89378762, 89378752, 89378731, 89378716, 89378689, 89378672, 89378662, 89378646, 89378627, 89378612, 89378586, 89378568, 89378551, 89378495, 89378447, 89378415, 89378378, 89378148, 89378034, 89377843, 89377717, 89377552, 89334264, 89334114, 89334040, 89333541, 89333399, 89333191, 89332952, 89332779, 89332593, 89332383, 89332211, 89331645, 89331497, 89331383, 89331183, 89331018, 89330890, 89330750, 89330647, 89330527, 89330425, 89330164, 89330052, 89329831, 89329723, 89327663, 89327571, 89327478, 89327424, 89326714, 89326632, 89326520, 89326463, 89326351, 89326299, 89325567, 89325519, 89324891, 89324804, 89324740, 89324678, 89324627, 89324477, 89274334, 89274054, 89273873, 89273768, 89273686, 89272972, 89272946, 89272882, 89272861, 89272841, 89272800, 89272752, 89272705, 89272674, 89272644, 89272530, 89272475, 89272404, 89272351, 89272300, 89221513, 89221438, 89221383
Zatigem (2020-08-18 08:19:40+00:00): Edit: J'ai remplacé "designated" par "yes"
s8evq (2020-09-30 11:27:57+00:00): Dag vimes7,
Bedankt voor deze edit. Wat je gedaan hebt is prima. Een kleine aanvulling misschien: Als je highway=path instelt, dan komen er daar een pak toegankelijkheidsrestricties automatisch bij. In deze tabel kun je dit zien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium

Dus highway=path wil in Belgie automatisch zeggen mofa=yes moped=yes horse=yes bicycle=yes foot=yes.

Misschien is het beter om in plaats van access=no te gebruiken, eerder horse=no, moped=no en mofa=no te zetten.

Dit heeft het (heel kleine) voordeel dat de weg niet met een rode stippellijn gemarkeerd wordt door de access=no.

Nogmaals, wat je doet is prima, dit is slechts een heel kleine tip.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89560603
vimes7 (2020-10-09 15:31:47+00:00): Beste s8evq,
bedankt voor de tip. Ik heb onmiddellijk dezelfde aanpassing gemaakt aan het kleine stukje weg 324206260 dat erop aansluit.
FransWillem (2020-08-24 11:45:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks. Please use the Maxar Premium Imagery which is default for this project.
Also do not tag buildings with a name=home and don;t tag the stories

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
wireguy (2020-08-19 22:58:33+00:00): callum, you dragged a node from the pitch to another task.  reverting.
please be more careful.
osmviborg (2020-08-18 09:05:51+00:00): Hej. Jeg har ændret dine veje til: highway=proposed
proposed=residential
& 'brownfield' til 'greenfield'
Lytter1 (2020-08-18 09:13:58+00:00): Havde set fejlen, men tak for hjælpen.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:39:17+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:38:42+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-08-20 15:30:22+00:00): hi, there. this is not a beach at all. there's a residual wasteplant right behind- please revert this incorrect edit at Funchal
pio2_122 (2020-08-18 10:35:28+00:00): Nie ma adresów typu "166i168" - są już one dodane jako osobne punkty...
Naprawione.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89563722
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:38:30+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Fra00 (2020-08-18 11:25:20+00:00): Could you please explain the changes you bring to the map in the comment section (writing just "improvements" is not very useful, because everyone improves the map), otherwise it will be difficult for other users to understand and check everything. Thank you.
damianeue (2020-08-18 11:44:20+00:00): Ok, but since my changesets are really big it's difficult for me to list all the changes I've made, anyway I'll try
Fra00 (2020-08-18 12:20:03+00:00): OSM guidelines actually discourage big changesets, probably for this very reason, but thank you for understanding.
cquest (2020-08-19 10:00:05+00:00): Les numéros multiples devraient être séparés par des ;

Ex: 41;43;45
MathieuLL (2020-08-19 10:07:08+00:00): Merci pour la revue, c'est corrigé ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89625639
MathieuLL (2020-08-19 10:09:12+00:00): J'ai eu un doute à cause de l'aide contextuelle sur le champ addr:housenumber qui indique "Si un lieu a de multiples numéros, les séparer par « , », exemple « 12b, 12c ». "
MathieuLL (2020-08-19 10:09:43+00:00): Par contre la documentation complète ici est correcte : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr
Marc_ch (2020-10-21 10:48:56+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez mal lu la page wikipedia :)
Salutations,
Marc
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 10:50:03+00:00): Dag kaartenliefhebber,
De tag winkelnummer is niet gedocumenteerd in de wiki.
En internationaal natuurlijk onbegrijpelijk.
Nmm kun je dat beter vervangen door ref=
En tenslotte denk ik dat je dat beter kunt weglaten: het bevat geen bruikbare informatie voor de kaartgebruikers.
Die hebben genoeg aan shop en name.
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 11:14:53+00:00): Ik heb die vraag ook gesteld in het forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=798162#p798162
kaartenliefhebber (2020-08-18 12:02:43+00:00): Hallo Leo,

bedankt voor je feedback, dat winkelnummer stond er al in, ik had alleen de "brand" info toegevoegd, dat winkelnummer hoeft er van mij ook niet per se bij, het kan alleen misschien handig zijn in de directe link naar de winkel, bv voor deze
https://www.gall.nl/winkels/details/?storeId=8178
maar dan kun je beter deze link direct gebruiken bij website, uit het winkelnummer kun je die url niet herleiden

eens kijken of er commentaar op komt op het forum...
skyper (2020-09-10 21:54:42+00:00): Hi goltapan

Die Weg westlich der Tullastraße sind, wenn überhaupt, höchsten "driveway", auch passen sie zu keinem Luftbild und sind schlampig eingezeichnet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149340
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149341

Die Wege östlich der Tullastraße sind 
auch nur "Driveway" und stimmen auch nicht exakt. Vor allem der Anfang bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7822592757 ist wohl einiges daneben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149343

Kannst Du mir bitte mitteilen von wem und wann dieser Änderungssatz überprüft wurde, damit ich mich von der Arbeit der Reviewer überzeugen kann.

Wenn schon keine Zugangsbestimmungen eingetragen werden fände ich zumindest ein "note" oder "FIXME" angebracht. Warum nicht noch zusätzlich "access=permissive" wenn es über privaten Grund geht.

Danke und Grüße skyper