piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2022-10-05 09:28:08+00:00): Hier noch ein anderer Router, der Radrouten und Knotenpunktnetze verarbeitet:
https://cycle.travel/map?lat=52.6565&lon=13.3005&zoom=13 (aktualisiert sich aber nur höchstens alle ein bis zwei Monate)

Sven
cyton (2022-10-05 19:42:04+00:00): ah verstehe, der spezifische knotenpunkt-knoten muss also in der route enthalten sein... 
logisch macht es find ich aber mehr sinn wenn die ganze kreuzung als dieser knoten gilt, geht aber nicht, da die radwege drumherum gehen
streckenkundler (2022-10-05 20:51:15+00:00): Nun, bei diesen Knotenpunktnetzen muß man schon etwas nachdenken.  In dem von mir im bisherigen Forum gestarteten  Beitragsfaden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31239 hab ich mir  alles Wissen erarbeitet und da steht sehr viel drin, ich hab mir damit mein Wissen erarbeitet, aber auch mein Wissen ist nicht abschließend...

Meine persönliche Priorität bei Knotenpunktnetzen:
1. es gibt die Netzwerk-Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7832319
2. diese enthält:  die Knotenpunkte selbst, z.B.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5315202615 als auch 
3. die Verbindungsrouten-Relationen zwischen den Knotenpunkten, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8894596
4, diese Verbindungsrouten-Relationen sollen enthalten: die Wegesegmente zwischen den Knoten, als auch die Knoten selbst. 
5. wenn zutreffend, enthält diese Netzwerkrelation auch Verbindungsrouten-Relationen zum jeweils benachbarten Knotenpunktnetz, dan auch jeweiles mit der Rolle "connection"

Ich habe sehr viele Teile dieser Knotenpunktnetze in Brandenburg selbst erfasst und diese Mindestkriterien sind für mich unerläßlich um effizient und für mich nachvollziehbar Fehler zu finden.

Das JOSM da meckert, ignoriere ich, da mu0 noch nachgearbeitet werden. 

Ich persönlich nehme bei den Verbindungsrouten-Relationen (vgl. Nr. 4) auch zusätzlich die Wegweiserstandorte als Rolle Guidepost mit auf, das ist aber eine persönliche Marotte... Das wird gelegentlich auch beu Themenradrouten  gemacht, da kenn ich aber kein hinreichend einheitliches Erfassungsschema.

Alle weiteren Fehlerprüfungen überlasse ich dann https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/de/networks , Dickes Danke an die Entwickler!!

Im übrigen würde ich mir sowas für Themenradrouten wünschen.

Sven
seattlefyi (2022-10-03 20:48:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits, and welcome (back?)! It looks like there's a new building outline visible in the Esri World Imagery and also the Maxar Premium alternate imagery layers available in the iD Editor. Guessing that that is the new fire station? Thanks again!
eggie (2022-10-03 21:08:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
snoozingnewt (2022-10-03 20:48:03+00:00): Where are you getting this data from?
BubbaJuice (2022-10-04 05:38:39+00:00): Looks like a direct copy from Google Maps.
Scottahemi (2022-11-17 17:16:13+00:00): between that and bing maps... delete if if you want or whatever
BubbaJuice (2022-11-17 18:09:56+00:00): You cant copy from either of those.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:29:45+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126934453
5m4u9 (2022-10-04 01:48:32+00:00): Gracias por las ediciones en Cobija.
4b696d (2022-10-12 16:38:17+00:00): Ich habe das allotment_house mal wieder entfernt ...
smaptious (2022-10-19 20:39:04+00:00): Hola, Salve100, notamos que cambiaste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100718244 a "highway=pedestrian" y "oneway=no". ¿Ha cambiado recientemente a una carretera bidireccional?

Por ejemplo, en Maxar Premium Imagery parece que hay una línea de alto en todo lo ancho de la carretera cerca de este nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10073922104 que indica que debería ser un sentido único en dirección oeste.

ESRI World (Clarity) muestra que se trata de una carretera muy transitada con muchos vehículos, que parecía ser modelada correcta en  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary Este camino no es principalmente para peatones?, o es un camino muy transitado para vehículos?
johantiden (2022-11-09 06:34:28+00:00): This revert method is very sloppy. Just because I didn't write a message in Osmose doesn't mean I didn't do my due research. Don't use the message to classify bad or good changesets.

You have reverted a lot of good changes here.

I spent a lot of time doing these changes. I admit some of my changes have been sloppy but most of them are not. You should be able to measure (or do your research) for which changesets to revert. 

The argument "that would take too much time" is elitist at best, saying your time is worth more than mine. This is gatekeeping. 

You have left the data in an inconsistent state now because you have partially reverted my work. I will have to work hard to fix this, or just give up. It's not fun anymore.
Leo Slager (2022-10-06 22:20:06+00:00): Is er nu éénrichtingsverkeer op de Punterweg ?
Allroads (2022-10-07 19:26:41+00:00): Foutje, zag dat Geim de boel al had samengevoegd.
Waarschijnlijk voor de knip al oneway=yes gezet.
Bedankt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 00:23:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305318069/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
tmack8001 (2024-03-16 03:33:55+00:00): I was attempting to indicate the bridge was under construction. My vehicle navigation system was attempting to navigate over the bridge this change was to prevent that. Maybe misused the construction=* tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:45:36+00:00): In such case highway=construction works for that (and thanks for mapping - BTW, is it now completed and open or still under construction?)

but in such case construction=construction adds no useful info, I will remove it then
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:46:09+00:00): As side effect - road construction is now rendered in default map style at osm website now.
tmack8001 (2024-03-16 12:05:54+00:00): Ah thanks for that. Yes, I believe the construction is finished - been a while since I've driven by though so relying on memory here.

This changeset if memory serves me right was my first mapping contribution.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 18:38:54+00:00): Oh yes, according to changesets_count=1 it is exactly your first edit (and I had far worse confusion in my initial edits! I was editing combined footway-cycleway which at that time had even more confused documentation and support in editors than it has now)

> Yes, I believe the construction is finished

I will mark it as drivable way then! (done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148745497 )

I wish you a happy mapping!
kubahahaha (2022-10-04 15:18:56+00:00): Cześć, ta nazwa ulicy M. Pikura to błąd, umyślny wandalizm, czy serio tu jest taka nazwa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24048073
Supaplex030 (2022-10-04 08:05:33+00:00): Hallo mardiz, du hast hier surface=sett durch "cobblestone" ersetzt - dieser Wert wird aber in OSM nicht mehr empfohlen, da er lediglich eine "Oberkategorie" für verschiedene Formen von Kopfsteinpflaster darstellt. "sett" ist die korrekte Bezeichnung für künstlich behauenes Kopfsteinpflaster (in Abgrenzung zu "natürlichem, rundem, unbehauenem" Kopfsteinpflaster) und ist daher an den meisten Stellen in Berlin die korrekte Bezeichnung. So auch hier. Habe daher die Änderungen wieder zurückgesetzt (z.B. deine Korrektur in der Waldstraße von "paving_stones" zu "sett" übernommen).

lg, Alex
mardiz (2022-10-04 10:11:42+00:00): sett: Behauenes Steinpflaster mit geglätteter Oberflächen.
Was heißt hier geglättet? Es gibt im Bereich Moabit geglättetes Kopfsteinpflaster im Hilda-Geiringer-Weg und Am Hamburger Bf., hier im verkehrsberuhigten Bereich sind die Köpfe eher rund und teilweise schlecht verlegt und eher für Fatbikes geeignet
mardiz (2022-10-04 10:18:56+00:00): Sett ist für mich eher Kleinsteinpflaster
Supaplex030 (2022-10-04 10:48:56+00:00): Die Eignung/Befahrbarkeit müssen wir mit "smoothness" ausdrücken. "Normales" (also schlechtes) Berliner Kopfsteinpflaster ist meistens "smoothness=bad".

Unbehauenes Kopfsteinpflaster ("unhewn_cobblestone") gibt es in Berlin nicht mehr oder höchstens vereinzelt in den Außenbezirken. Das passt hier definitiv nicht. Und "cobblestone" ist wie gesagt nur der veraltete Oberbegriff für beides. "Behauen" und "geglättet" heißt mehr oder weniger, dass es keine Natursteine sind, sondern diese künstlich bearbeitet, also geglättet, sind. "Glatt" ist die Straße deshalb leider nicht ;)

Zur Verwendung der surface- und smoothness-Tags gibt es hier eine gute Tabelle mit vielen Beispielbildern, die dazu beitragen soll, die Kategorien in OSM einheitlich zu verwenden (einige davon auch aus Berlin): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness/Gallery

Groß- und Kleinsteinpflaster können wir in OSM also bisher höchstens über den smoothness-Wert unterscheiden, da das Kleinsteinpflaster meistens besser befahrbar ist. Ich hab schon seit längerem vor, ein Proposal für einen Subtag für "sett" zu entwickeln, damit die verschiedenen Pflastertypen auch direkt abgebildet werden können, aber ich komme derzeit nicht dazu...
Supaplex030 (2022-10-04 10:51:08+00:00): P.S. "cobblestone" würde auch recht schnell wieder verschwinden, da StreetComplete in diesen Fällen die surface-Quest stellt. Unbedarfte User wählen dann manchmal "paving_stones" aus, sodass im schlimmsten Fall sogar mehr kaputt geht.
InsertUser (2022-10-03 22:52:55+00:00): Actually service road traces.
Lokai (2022-10-04 02:09:32+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.

Zu Anfang empfiehlt es sich Hinweise im wiki zu lesen.
Bspw.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

OSM bitte nicht als Testplattform benutzen.

Gruß

L.
AaronFitz (2022-11-27 01:12:15+00:00): Google maps shows no such "private road" signs, town does not list it as private.
ALocalRunner5 (2022-11-27 03:11:02+00:00): Hey Aaron, I only made this adjustment because I was physically on windy hill ln 2 months ago. There were signs saying something like “Private Drive” and “No trespassing”. Don’t make assumptions based on Google Maps. Street view can be extremely helpful, but it hasn’t been updated in 10 years on this road. If you are going to make an edit make sure it’s somewhere you are familiar with and I’d recommend consulting town data as well.
zorglubu (2022-10-04 13:52:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Les man_made=embankment que vous avez dessinés me semblent être plutôt un simple terre-plein central, et non pas un "talus". Éventuellement, si vous tenez vraiment à les cartographier, barrier=kerb serait plus adapté.
Bien cordialement.
Allison P (2022-10-03 23:35:38+00:00): This one took awhile, maybe 40 minutes. Quite a few duplexes here, interestingly, and some row houses. This suggests age, but despite this most  street suffixes were standard. Overall challenging, but not by the era's standards.
Glassman (2022-10-04 00:39:23+00:00): #TIP: leave the address as a node - it's likely the county will reuse the address on new buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126963918
jvangeld (2022-10-12 18:12:46+00:00): Gotcha, thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126963918
mariotomo (2022-10-04 15:48:31+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM. welcome to OSM. I see you're mapping with iD in German, so I take you are a remote mapper, and I see that this is your first contribution.
OSM is a whole community of people concerned with mapping the world, we add information, we update, and some of us review and try to give hints, to correct the data and help improve contributions.
here I should suggest you to read the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. the description "Supermarkt" isn't really helpful to reviewers ;-)
hope to see your next contributions, cheers, and enjoy mapping.
Supaplex (2022-10-04 16:30:48+00:00): 公園應該盡可能用區域來繪製
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964551
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:32:22+00:00): 不宜加導航路徑，與既有路徑重疊了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964593
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:25:28+00:00): 學校已經有了，重複添加
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4636240
另外還有加導航路徑，與既有路徑重疊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964596
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:22:11+00:00): 應該不是整棟建築是醫院吧？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964600
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:20:43+00:00): 疑似不存在宗教場所，以及拉到巷弄了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964617
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:18:37+00:00): 用的標籤不對
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964627
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:06:59+00:00): 請問真的有這座宗教崇拜場所嗎？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964673
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:06:09+00:00): 新的道路形狀怪怪，可能與既有路徑重疊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964744
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:05:01+00:00): 導航路線不宜直接畫上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964763
Supaplex (2022-10-04 16:27:36+00:00): 動物醫院應該用獸醫院標籤，並不是醫院
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964765
Supaplex (2022-10-04 12:03:12+00:00): 好像把家店店與公車站誤合併了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126964843
felipeeugenio (2022-10-04 22:27:09+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres genéricos para nombras las cosas. saludos
user_5359 (2022-10-22 11:06:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1100735949 (not closed way). What is the meaning of the tags 
buildingd = unclassified
highway = unclassified
?
user_5359 (2022-10-07 06:43:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/14213577. what is the meaning of the tag ghost	= night_with._haunted_forests? Have second look on https://www.osm.org/way/1100731295. There exists a tag ghots = night_with._haunted_forests. Is this a typo or a different key?
SzymonH (2022-10-04 10:32:01+00:00): Węzły na torowisku https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3109307352 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1450524411 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/412975046 ) nie powinny moim zdaniem mieć tagów highway=bus_stop oraz bus=no bo jak dobrze rozumiem są to miejsca zatrzymania się tramwaju. W tych lokalizacjach brakuje za to węzła highway=bus_stop dodanego jako osobny punkt.
Natsuyasumi (2022-10-04 10:36:09+00:00): Ah, highway=bus_stop nie ruszałem. Rzeczywiście nie ma to sensu i można to do osobnego węzła wydzielić.
SzymonH (2022-10-04 11:12:47+00:00): To jeżeli to możliwe to proszę o zmianę tych tagów :)
Natsuyasumi (2022-10-05 00:39:03+00:00): Wydzielone w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127021487
Supaplex (2022-10-04 10:55:21+00:00): Hi
好像你把Youbike 1.0與Youbike 2.0誤合併了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126965714
Supaplex (2022-10-04 16:24:43+00:00): 你好，

好像不小心把道路的節點誤拉位置跑掉了，目前已經修正，之後編輯請稍微留意
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126965906
tmack8001 (2022-10-04 01:44:54+00:00): Actually think instead of removing the toll_booth node I should have created a `man_made:gantry` tag instead? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgantry
Supaplex (2022-10-04 11:57:10+00:00): 重複了，已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296123001
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126966100
iigmir (2023-05-13 16:59:30+00:00): 「為甚麼沒有住家的標籤」

其實有，但那是區域標籤。很遺憾沒讓您找到。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
Supaplex (2022-10-04 11:13:37+00:00): 公園宜用區域標示
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126966120
EMIdent (2022-10-13 10:50:32+00:00): Deleted fix me and note due to interchange fully added
user_8655426 (2022-10-04 09:31:54+00:00): Arigatou gozaimasu!
(= Thank you so much!)
relaemanila (2022-10-04 03:47:09+00:00): Hello Matteo.

The way you created was the end of the South Luzon Expressway Toll Road 6. However, there might be a future project in the Visayas.
EMIdent (2022-10-04 11:53:50+00:00): Ok. So is this the end of SLEX TR6?
relaemanila (2022-10-04 14:04:54+00:00): Yes, SLEX TR6 is a Sorsogon-Samar Link Bridge that goes from Matnog to Allen.
Minh Nguyen (2022-10-04 03:20:16+00:00): Also updated the address in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126968013
Supaplex (2022-10-04 11:09:21+00:00): 請問刪除各種名稱與付款方式的依據是？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126968114
Supaplex (2022-10-04 11:07:56+00:00): 巷弄的點拉到了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126968361
Warin61 (2022-10-05 01:57:51+00:00): Hi,
The relation 14652383 'Hire Depot' is not correct. 

First the tag 'building=yes' says that the entire area is a building. 

Second a multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. This feature does not require a relation; simply map the outside of the area and label that with the name, shop and possibly 'landuse=retail' 

The layer key is used to indicate that something is physically higher or lower than something  else... there is none of that here. 

A comment: when you alter something look for the existence of the tag 'source=*' .. if you are using a different source .. simply delete the tag 'source=*'
PhysicalGraffiti (2022-10-05 06:45:42+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, ive physically visited today to clarify a few things. The area still isnt perfect but have rectified those issues.
Warin61 (2022-10-05 09:09:20+00:00): Perfection is hard to achieve, and even harder to maintain!

As long as it is a reasonable representation of what is there I'd call it good.
Supaplex (2022-10-04 16:20:40+00:00): 標籤用錯了，應該是診所
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126968376
Unbeatable101 (2022-10-04 12:15:24+00:00): Hi Roberto IU, please do not use the description=* tag for advertising your store.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
L'imaginaire (2022-10-04 07:48:42+00:00): 👍
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Maradona11 (2022-11-16 23:23:43+00:00): Hi,
make sure that they "one way" is tagged correctly.  in some cases the direction is alternative for some services.  ie at Revesby Station - T8 Revesby to Central
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-19 10:05:18+00:00): sorry, thanks for fixing this
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-10-05 16:05:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег building:levels=8;1. Как определить, у какого здания 8 этажей, а у какого 1 этаж?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14652438
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
habi (2023-01-31 15:30:04+00:00): Ciao gsommer1981.

Du hast hier dem Restaurant einen beschreibenden Namen gegeben (Da Luca (Pächterwechsel, Neueröffnung November)).
Laut Webseite (https://www.daluca.ch) ist das Ding 'nur' noch ein Hotel.
Weisst du mehr darüber?

Gruss,
habi
gsommer1981 (2023-02-13 17:36:27+00:00): Das Restaurant heisst neu Dogan‘s. Habe den Eintrag angepasst.
habi (2023-02-13 20:22:01+00:00): Super, mersi!
rhtb0 (2022-10-04 13:30:30+00:00): General recommendation: changesets should be local.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Russ McD (2022-10-05 06:24:22+00:00): Yes, as an experienced mapper of over 10 years, I'm fully aware of the guidelines, and this would not have happened using traditional editing tools (JOSM/id/P3, etc).
Unfortunately, when using a program such as Map Roulette, this generates random worldwide tasks, in this case taking me from the UK to Haiti, to Canada, to the UK again !
I believe normally MR will make each task a single change set, but when used in combination with the Potlatch editor, this does not automatically happen...  as in this case.
MxxCon (2022-10-06 00:57:57+00:00): But when converting it from node to way, did you not see on w1100755168 
addr:housename="6.30am to 4.45pm, Monday to Friday and 6.30am to 4.45pm on the weekends"? 🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126970281
Russ McD (2022-10-06 01:41:20+00:00): Hi, Guess that must have been an oversight on my part, sorry - Potlatch normally carries over the tags, when I convert a node to a way.
I'm realising the huge shortfalls of MapRoulette now, and in this case not sure why this came up as needing "fixing" if was correct in the first place. 
I gave it a try after listening to a SoTM presentation ... won't use it again ... too much grief ! Cheers.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.