piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2015-05-05 07:19:13+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at fikse det her så det virker og er korrekt. Det er ikke tilstrækkeligt (eller korrekt) at lægge en stump vej oven i en eksisterende.

Velkommen til vores projekt i øvrigt og tak for bidragene
DaVania (2015-05-05 16:57:42+00:00): Tak!

Det føltes heller ikke korrekt, men havde svært ved at rette det, og ville vende tilbage
pnorman (2015-05-11 07:56:37+00:00): how did you identify http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342784769 as a commons? I can't see any evidence in the imagery
alekno (2015-05-12 14:43:13+00:00): no evidence at all, only satellite images, SRTM. According the HOT task I just marked flat 30m radius spots as commons for needed helicopter landing. Theses spots have been reviewed by other mappers and also helicopter experts later. I know thise does fit poorly into the usual tagging scheme. Contact the HOT team for complains.
alekno (2015-05-12 14:53:05+00:00): Having some aviation background, I want to give you a link what the situation really is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=43&v=rsLoqK1TB74
SomeoneElse (2015-05-25 17:51:20+00:00): Was there any discussion of this change nefore it was made, so that anyone who was still rendering "aed" on maps had a chance to change?  I can understand the logic behind the change ("defibrillator" is easy to understand; "aed" is not) but a public "hey, I'm going to change this" message would be really helpful so that emergency information does not disappear from people's maps.
Klumbumbus (2015-05-25 17:57:51+00:00): No, I did not start a discussion. There were only 6 nodes worldwide (compared to more than 8000 of emergency=defibrillator). So I don't think that anyone was using it. And if someone was using it then he was lost also before this change with his 6 nodes ;)
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 30632976, 30663913, 30656614, 30657065, 30634112, 30633020, 30633431, 30632352, 30632206, 30633136, 30656314, 30633997, 30657694, 30658287, 30633229, 30658317, 30658562, 30779881, 30656631, 30634152, 30656205, 30658096, 30634564, 30664335, 30780165, 30632508, 30656381, 30780372, 30780471, 30657055, 30664125, 30780147, 30656346, 30663790, 30632893, 30664214, 30780290, 30633407, 30656287, 30780422, 30780340, 30780030, 30633650, 30664550, 30780380, 30656240, 30658141, 30658329, 30632557, 30663660, 30780113, 30633779, 30634299, 30657163, 30633664, 30663183, 30656847, 30663820, 30780093, 30633402, 30657215, 30633002, 30663588, 30657821, 30658191, 30663115, 30664042, 30633090, 30658675, 30656479, 30633687, 30633939, 30656957, 30658132, 30634912, 30633314, 30633374, 30780452, 30663342, 30780187, 30664199, 30633065, 30658304, 30634389, 30780231, 30632869, 30634464, 30657190, 30664394, 30780410, 30656367, 30780349, 30658085, 30633548, 30780336, 30656951, 30780314, 30656230, 30634220, 30656170, 30780136, 30780277, 30663814, 30657911, 30633483, 30656909, 30633366, 30656408, 30656354, 30633626, 30658612, 30663533, 30656675, 30658246, 30780319, 30633804, 30656208, 30634289, 30656223, 30658013, 30779952, 30656176, 30656358, 30663562, 30658175, 30658118, 30634190, 30664322, 30656274, 30663038, 30658640, 30633012, 30657200, 30780393, 30633867, 30632616, 30658519, 30658350, 30656440, 30656873, 30658060, 30663871, 30657760, 30656968, 30780435, 30658024, 30634341, 30779897, 30632907, 30780150, 30631635, 30658365, 30780179, 30779852, 30632101, 30663476, 30656879, 30657338, 30634247, 30633412, 30633829, 30633471, 30634090, 30658498, 30656854, 30780424.
Nearo (2015-05-05 02:34:07+00:00): Hoi Maarten,

De rotonde aan de Leunseweg is inderdaad weer open. Ik vroeg me af waarom je deze tertiary ipv secondary hebt gemaakt.

Groetjes,
Nearo
Maarten Deen (2015-05-05 06:02:10+00:00): Omdat ik zat te slapen. Maar jij ook, ik heb had secondary gemaakt i.p.v. tertiary ;)
naoliv (2015-05-22 17:14:39+00:00): Fernando, quando for traçar as ruas, faça um caminho para cada rua.
Em algumas partes você usou alguns caminhos que dão várias voltas ou então formando um círculo/loop.
lokejul (2016-02-04 17:27:49+00:00): Hi Alan Trick,

This is a question to start discussion about tagging of sidewalks in this local area.

I see that you have tagged several ways with highway=footway that are separate from the accompanying road. The footways are also disconnected from each other.

Where a sidewalk accompanies a road, I have been using sidewalk=* tags applied to the road itself, so that routing via software was possible.

Is this a duplication? There is only one sidewalk. Which method is more correct?

* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

Sincerely
Julian Loke
Alan Trick (2016-02-04 20:03:02+00:00): That is a duplicate, I think. I didn't realize that the road had a `sidewalk` tag on it (because it wasn't getting rendered by mapnik). Also, I only mapped the sidewalk on one side because that was all I surveyed at the time.

My first reaction would be to prefer footways (though it appears that I missed the pedestrian crossings), because they can be more detailed, and correspond more directly to physical objects. However, you make a good point when it comes to routing software.

I can't say I have any strong opinions. Also, now that I think about this a little more, it seems to that mapping footways and adding the sidewalk tag don't necessarily preclude each other...
lokejul (2016-02-04 20:27:57+00:00): Hi Alan Trick,

I started contributing to OSM as a hobby when my routing software refused to route pedestrian routes through the footways and cycleways in Mill Lake Park. Although clearly visible with Mapnik in Mill Lake Park, the ways had not been connected to the roads, and sometimes not even to each other.

I think that tagging a road with sidewalk=* works well for those "normal" cases where the sidewalk is parallel to the road, and there is only a kerb and gutter as physical separation between the carriageway and the sidewalk.

So adding a highway=crossing node can be understood to be connecting sidewalks on one side of the road to the other.

On the other hand, some sidewalks do not run parallel to the accompanying road, or is physically separated by more than a kerb and a rain gutter (e.g. by a "jersey" concrete barrier, or a deep ditch) The wiki indicates that separate highway=footway would be needed to represent such reality. 

I can think of several examples of the latter situation in the local area.

Would it make sense to use sidewalk=* for the parallel state, and a separate way for the non-parallel state?

I am trying not to map at cross purposes with fellow contributors to OSM. (even when Vespucci throws a glitch and adds nonsense tags to my edits)

Sincerely
Julian Loke
Gumeg (2017-08-01 13:05:48+00:00): Доброго дня. А откуда вы брали адресные данные для Садового?
Irrealmild (2017-08-02 08:34:30+00:00): Я проезжаю через Садовое в Ахмат периодически, что смог по центральным улицам собрать - отметил. К сожалению, нет возможности все Садовое обойти, чтобы всю адресацию нанести.
Oskarst_ (2023-10-05 08:18:15+00:00): Er way 342813124 en skogsvei? Den ligger inne med en turvei-relation. Ser ikke ut til å finnes i satellittbilde eller DTM. Den har heller ingen bruk i Strava Heatmap.
Wulfmorn (2023-10-05 08:48:17+00:00): Ser ut som veldig "finger i været-stier" der. Kanskje den faktiske turstien går et annet sted og relasjonen bare har kommet på villespor.
Wulfmorn (2023-10-05 08:54:00+00:00): Jeg gjorde noen forbedringen fra flyfoto så det er litt lettere å vurdere hvor selve turstien skal være :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142178936
HaPe-CZ (2021-03-30 10:52:42+00:00): Pokud je to "Návrh", nemá to na mapách co dělat, protože to ve skutečnosti není.
Piskvor (2021-03-30 10:55:11+00:00): Nemá to na mapách co dělat jako reálná trať. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:proposed
HaPe-CZ (2021-03-30 11:11:28+00:00): Ok, tak to smazej. Key je taktéž sporadický (Ověřitelnost této stránky je sporná. Zkontrolujte, prosím, diskusi na této stránce a tuto zprávu do vyřešení sporu neodstraňujte.)
Mimo jiné na https://mestemnakole.cz/2018/08/nove-znaceni-trasy-a2-na-praze-2/ je celá situace rozepsána i s kritikou vedení cyklotrasy po vozovce a na vozovce je pouze jako nouzová.
Piskvor (2021-03-30 11:25:37+00:00): Komentuješ tři roky starý článek na šest let starým changesetu...a všimni si, že ta opatření jsou tam kritizována jako blbá sice, ale reálně existující.

Pokud se ti ta opatření nelíbí (což chápu, mně se nelíbí taky), lobbuj za jejich opravu v reálu; tím, že si namalujem císařovy nové šaty v OSM, se ten problém neopraví.
HaPe-CZ (2021-03-30 11:34:25+00:00): Ty ses asi špatně vyspal, píšeš hovadiny. Po nábřeží to je pouze nouzovka, i je to tak značené na značkách - čárkovaně - - -. P.S. sám si z toho starého článku poslal fotku tak si to nějak u sebe srovnej, čím vlastně chceš argumentovat.
Gumeg (2016-10-19 10:52:34+00:00): А что за баню вы увидели возде ТЦ Щёлковский? Вот \та точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3497840288
neo-plan (2016-10-19 11:55:15+00:00): А что за баня? По вашей ссылке - точка "Антенна сотовой связи"!?
Gumeg (2016-10-19 14:59:37+00:00): Извиняюсь, пропустил буквы при наборе с телефона. "башню" имелось ввиду. =) Я там никакой башни просто не видел.. Если это мачта с коробками для сотовой связи, то стоит добавить man_made=mast
neo-plan (2016-10-19 16:46:52+00:00): Да, по-моему она должна быть. Уже не помню - давно было. Исправляю, как вы написали!
olehz (2016-02-12 22:45:15+00:00): Де ти знайшов памятник Геврику біля 5-ої школи?
Myazyk (2016-02-19 11:26:05+00:00): У Вікіпедії. Там пише: "Бюст Григорія Геврика перед школою № 5, в якій до 1941 року він вчився і яка в післявоєнні радянські часи носила його ім'я. Встановлений 1970 року. Скульптори Валентин Подольський, Валентин Борисенко".
На власні очі його не бачив, оскільки у школі №5 не бував
olehz (2016-02-19 13:31:02+00:00): та нічого подібного нема - той памятник по ходу перенесли на перехрестя горішня брама - завіжна
Myazyk (2016-02-19 13:33:48+00:00): там отакий пам'ятник стоїть? https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%94%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B0#/media/File:Drogobych_P6190284.JPG
Myazyk (2016-02-19 13:34:38+00:00): Бо я знаю, що там такий: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%94%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B0#/media/File:Drogobych_P6190277.JPG
olehz (2016-02-19 16:00:22+00:00): https://sc-cdn.scaleengine.net/i/54dc1159247c742ddff298613cd6fefb.png - поточна ситуація
Myazyk (2016-02-19 16:43:42+00:00): Ну значить уже нема)
Tiamate (2018-01-14 08:12:41+00:00): Hallo,
deine Änderung von hospital auf health_centre halte ich nicht für richtig.
.
hospital osm-wiki:
.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital.
.
institutions for health care providing treatment by specialised staff and equipment, and typically providing nursing care for longer-term patient stays.
.
und genau das ist der Theresienhof.
Walter Schlögl (2018-01-14 11:33:33+00:00): Hallo wilmaed,

laut Homepage würde wohl amenity=clinic am besten passen.

Walter
Tiamate (2018-01-14 12:15:15+00:00): OSM clinic:
"Admission of inpatients is not typically provided. ...
 Also consider amenity=hospital if the facility is very large with hundreds of staff and/or offers inpatient care (beds for long stays)."
.
Der Theresienhof besitzt stationäre Betten, mit Tages- und Nachtschwestern. Inklusive Großküche, die auch die ambulanten Patienten vom Hotel Frohnleitnerhof versorgt.
Walter Schlögl (2018-01-14 18:22:34+00:00): Wann das so ist, dann ist hospital (mit emergency=no) wirklich die passende Erfassung.
ij_ (2015-05-05 13:41:58+00:00): Mapnik issue shouldn't be solved by removing correct tags!
ynrmut7mu5ret (2015-05-05 14:07:15+00:00): In principle, you are right. But let's face the reality: Mapnik is the most popular renderer and it's not fast (if even possible) to change it.

Moreover, information about the ford is not really important in that place. Vehicle traffic is not allowed there and pedestrians are not so much concerned with it.
ij_ (2015-05-05 14:14:00+00:00): This is entirely mapnik issue. It should not render car image there and that's it.
Please see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford It mentions even ford=stepping_stones which definately does not apply to vehicles but foot so it's entirely valid to tag these as fords!

I think this change should simply be reverted or actually replaced with ford=* rather than deprecated highway=ford.
ynrmut7mu5ret (2015-05-05 14:34:06+00:00): Ok, I'll replace with ford=*. Thanks for comment!
ij_ (2015-05-05 14:43:34+00:00): Ok, thanks.
It's indeed unfortunately how difficult it's to change the default rendering currently but I suspect this might even be fixable if somebody would submit a patch which adds a check for the highway type that crosses the waterway as both should be in the DB already so no technical blockers for such fix (like there are for many other useful mapnik improvements; if one needs more data columns = tags than the DB currently has, it would require reimporting the DB which is rarely done).
cw1998 (2015-05-04 22:19:25+00:00): Sorry, I added *some* missing roads and pathways. I will be adding more later as I collect the data.
naoliv (2015-05-22 18:44:19+00:00): Grayson, não coloque os locais em cima da rua (como se fizessem parte dela), mas coloque no local onde realmente se encontram.
Você deixou vários objetos grudados na rua (hospital, etc)
Víctor L (2015-05-05 00:26:17+00:00): Se agregaron viñedos que están funcionando en esa zona desde hace unos años.
naoliv (2015-05-22 18:40:44+00:00): Por favor, tenha cuidado com essas ações danosas ao mapa (você apagou vários objetos).
Isso não é tolerado.
Palolo (2017-11-02 22:44:25+00:00): @[Timothy Smith] thanks for doing this clean up
urbanscrawl (2015-05-05 19:48:21+00:00): deleted a point in Vancouver map because it refers to a business that no longer exists - based on local knowledge
Skippern (2016-01-10 13:27:52+00:00): Grayson, porque adicionou maxspeed em miles por hora? Existe estradas no Brasil utilizando miles?
pnorman (2015-05-11 07:59:28+00:00): How'd you identify http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342875467 as a commons from imagery?
DemoLogin (2019-06-19 22:35:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61653530
Как может "жилая улица обозначенная знаком" иметь ограничение 60 кмч?
DemoLogin (2019-06-19 22:36:13+00:00): вероятно ошибка
Supaplex (2016-07-31 14:06:37+00:00): 你不小心把軌道弄到建築上了
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=30796671
已經修正了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41145898
MKnight (2017-04-25 10:23:25+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157513145 opening_hours getaggt. Kann es sein, dass Du eher eine contitional-restriction gemeint hast?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions oder https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58150
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-05 10:08:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30804690.
Stalfur (2015-05-05 09:52:46+00:00): Hello James. Thanks for adding the buildings, however you forgot to mark them as buildings, once you have drawn the outlines you click on Buildings on the left sidebar and there click the type (House) or simply Building again for a generic one. I've changed 3 of the ones you drew into Buildings and you can do the same for the rest.
Stalfur (2015-05-05 09:53:46+00:00): Also to make sure the angles are 90° you can click on S on your keyboard (or select Square building on the radial menu) which then adjusts corners to be 90° (hard to do manually, always off by a couple of °)
eggie (2019-03-18 08:03:29+00:00): Dag jens,

'k Zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen. De meeste edits buiten Nederland voor HOT OSM.
Bij deze alsnog... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-05 10:15:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 30804690
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-05 10:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30804690.
Smiljan_02 (2015-06-17 19:12:44+00:00): Hallo Steffen, die L 2070 wurde hier schon lange eingezogen, der Ausbauzustand rechtfertigt auch nicht die Weiterführung als 
highway=secondary.

MfG

Senni
adiatmad (2020-08-22 02:14:06+00:00): Halo Pak susiloutomo.

Anda menambahkan tag [building:levels](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels) sampai tiga digit angka [di sekitar bandara YIA](http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Xhs). Apakah ini yang dimaksud adalah nomor rumah?

Salam.
Nagesh_Blr (2015-05-05 08:31:51+00:00): The changeset is erroneously described as "#hotosm-nepal-earthquake-1030".

It should read "changes in ORR- Bellandur area"
derredu (2015-05-05 11:09:29+00:00): Das war witzig und jetzt bitte wieder rückgängig machen, Danke
Nakaner (2015-05-05 19:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.
nebulon (2015-05-08 10:33:05+00:00): Removed Murder Books Inc as the shop recently closed.
literan (2015-05-05 12:57:23+00:00): Уважаемый J_Doe, можно чуть тщательнее описывать чейнджсеты, а то явно несоответствует
J_Doe (2015-05-05 14:53:21+00:00): Это моя оплошность - описание относилось к одной из ранее сделанных правок, а затем я забыл его удалить, и оно автоматически присваивалось всем последующим правкам. Извините, пожалуйста, literan.
mikidanin (2015-05-05 09:56:22+00:00): toponim, spomenik
ij_ (2015-05-05 13:21:53+00:00): Why you LIE in your changeset comments? Or how exactly did you "replace local tags" here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30803284

Please please please, you're not even the first one to trying to destroy this data, why we need to continuously complain about same tags getting deleted by some random, non-local guy?
ij_ (2015-05-05 13:29:18+00:00): Hmm, this is the correct copy paste link I meant:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135744885/history
R0bst3r (2015-05-05 15:09:20+00:00): Hi ij_

"arava = yes" was used 7 times and only in a range of some 100 metres at 2 points around Helsinki. 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9by

Why not to use english, well known and defined tags? Then the info is for all people available and not for just 1%?

To prevent further "destroy of data" you can always add a note to your private tags.
alv (2015-05-05 15:18:56+00:00): a) It is seldom used because it's hard to collect (which makes it even more useful to store) b) The system does not have an international/global counterpart and c) in OSM, nobody has the authority to remove data others have contributed, unless they know it misdescribes what is on the ground.
ij_ (2015-05-05 18:36:39+00:00): Didn't you even read what I said?
...Given what you say now here, why you didn't then "replace" it with "english, well known and defined tag" yourself like you actually PROMISED in your changeset comment?!? Although I highly doubt there's some global tag you can find but I'm not entirely dismissing possibility that some subsidy related tag might exists deeply buried into the wiki.
In addition, the meaning of "Arava" is so obvious to locals (that name actually comes from Finnish law I think) that there's absolutely no point in adding notes about it for some non-locals who should randomly delete stuff that make no sense to them. It's alarming BTW, that also "further destroy of data" is to be expected?!? If you'd only delete data whose meaning you fully understand (or if applicable, you'd really "replace" the tags with ones that apply more globally like you claimed to do, even better obviously), we'd not be talking here.
Nakaner (2015-05-05 20:00:05+00:00): Because this user has done vandalism at his first changeset, I hereby ask everybody who reads this CS comment to check the edits (I am not a HOT mapper and I do not want to be a HOT mapper) and revert them if necessary. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30802225 "Stasi-Knast" means "prison of Stasi" in English, Stasi was the "official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (GDR)" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi)
hrniels (2015-05-05 18:13:57+00:00): Gibt es dafür eine festgelegte Vorgehensweise bei OSM? Ich persönlich finde es eigentlich besser die zusammenzulegen. Dadurch erreicht man ein schöneres Ergebnis, alles wird übersichtlicher und einfacher zu ändern und logisch enden die Flächen auch an der Straße. Vor allem wenn es sich sogar um Flächen des selben Typs handelt.
Zartbitter (2015-05-05 18:30:41+00:00): Du hast schon Recht, dass die Flächen bis zur Straße gehen, aber nur bis zu deren Rand. Straßen werden in OSM aber über eine Mittellinie definiert, nicht über eine Aussenlinie. Die Flächen gehen also bis zum Rand der Straße, aber nicht in die Straße hinein bis zur Mittellinie. Ein Friedhof z.B. erstreckt sich normalerweise nicht bis zur Straßenmitte. Ob der Renderer das schöner malt oder nicht, ist zweit- oder sogar drittrangig. Dass es besser änderbar wäre, sehe ich auch anders, aber da hat ja jeder seine eigenen Vorlieben, welche Arbeitschritte bevorzugt und als einfach angesehen werden. landuse=residential unterteilt man häufig bei größeren Straßen, damit keine riesigen Monsterpolygone entstehen, mit deren Handling man Neulinge abschreckt, Ich halte das auch i.A. für sinnvoll, da größere Straßen ein Wohngebiet auch fühlbar unterteilen. In einigen Städten werden die residentials sogar um einzelne Wohnblöcke gezogen, was ich aber für zu feingranular für den Zweck einer Wohnsiedlung halte.
hrniels (2015-05-05 18:41:30+00:00): Achso. Ich hatte es so betrachtet, dass die Straßenlinie die gesamte Straße repräsentiert. Denn man zeichnet ja nicht Mittellinie und Außenlinie getrennt ein, sondern nur eine Linie. Deshalb endet für mich landuse logisch betrachtet an dieser eingezeichneten Linie, welche für die gesamte Straßenbreite steht. Aber man kann es natürlich auch so wie du sehen :) Von mir aus können wir das daher so lassen wie es jetzt ist bzw. vor meinen Änderungen war.
trial (2017-10-19 19:28:43+00:00): bonjour, vous avez sans doute voulu dire noname=yes
HPman83 (2017-10-19 20:04:43+00:00): Bonjour,
non non, le nom de cette piste c'est la "Sans Nom"
trial (2017-10-19 20:15:12+00:00): C'est vrai qu'avec les majuscules j'aurais dû me douter que c'est un vrai nom. Merci !
schlosser67 (2015-05-05 09:56:32+00:00): Nur "blauer" Briefkasten! Die Beschreibung war noch von der vorigen Änderung gespeichert.
Hjart (2015-05-26 21:34:07+00:00): På ortofotos er det ikke til at få øje på de heller du har lavet på Vesterbro. Kan du køre en tur ad Vesterbro/Limfjordsbroen med Mapillary appen, så vi andre kan se hvordan der ser ud på jorden?

Der er desuden rod i en række http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restriction specielt i Vesterbro/Borgergade krydset. Det er formentlig lettest at få øje på det ved hjælp af JOSM's validator.
mikkolukas (2015-05-26 23:13:30+00:00): Hellerne ses nemt på google street view, men skal gerne tage en tur forbi med Mapillary også :)

Damn, ved ikke lige hvad jeg har lavet med de turn restrictions. De værste skulle vist gerne være rettet nu (har lige siddet på en anden computer gennem iD-editoren. Må lige tjekke op på det når jeg kommer tilbage til JOSM :)

Som altid, tak for feedback :)
Hjart (2015-05-29 04:12:03+00:00): Det er bedst at holde sig fra alle Google Map relaterede produkter når du redigerer OSM , så vi (OSM) ikke risikerer at komme i klammeri med deres copyrightfolk
Hjart (2015-05-29 04:18:44+00:00): Der er desuden en Mapillary plugin på vej til JOSM, som jeg glæder mig usigeligt til: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2015/Mapillary_plugin_for_JOSM
mikkolukas (2015-05-29 17:33:37+00:00): Det kan der være noget om o.O

De indtegnede heller er fra egne observationer, og tilnærmelser, ud fra svage markeringer på Bings sattelitfotos.

Jeg har været nede på nedre del af Vesterbro med en vens telefon med kamera i. Han uploader mapillary-billederne snarest muligt.

uh, spændende :)
mikkolukas (2015-05-31 20:34:38+00:00): Nogle billeder er hermed uploadet. I hvert fald fra Gammel Strandvej/Toldbodgade-krydset, Borgergade-krydset og Bispensgade/Urbansgade-krydset.