piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-12-28 13:37:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Your mappings are not  accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114639271
Frans S (2021-12-10 14:19:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
B: overlapping buildings drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114639369
Gustavo22Soares (2021-12-09 21:20:36+00:00): levando em conta em que as vias são duplicadas e tem muito transito a via deve ser considerada como primaria uma mudança dessa deve ser discutida com a comunidade
acabei revertendo suas mudanças
qualquer duvida estou aqui
feliPIdantas (2021-12-13 19:13:01+00:00): Obrigado, pelo reverte. Sim, acabei cometendo esse erro. Posteriormente, estudando um pouco vi que o certo seria mesmo primária (no caso brasileiro). Mas, não me aprofundei ainda. Espero em breve, estudar um pouco mais
Gustavo22Soares (2021-12-14 01:47:00+00:00): De boas, qualquer duvida estou aqui e tambem há o grupo no telegram do OSM Brasil
https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
ah seja bem vindo é sempre bom ter novos editores em Teresina!
Frans S (2021-12-10 13:06:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Please tag your mappings. building=yes
A building can mostly drawn with 4 nodes. rectangular or 6, when it has an extention.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114639980
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-07 02:04:17+00:00): Please stop vandalizing the map.  Your recent changesets have been reverted.
metagascar (2021-12-07 02:10:59+00:00): Stop Fudding bro,
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-07 02:25:00+00:00): The OpenStreetMap community will not permit vandalism.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-07 07:58:15+00:00): Is "Zzyzx Road" also a vandalism?
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-07 11:59:02+00:00): I'm not sure, that got added before. I made a comment on the changeset where that got added.
archpdx (2021-12-07 16:25:52+00:00): After looking at Streetside through iD, it looks like the name for exit 239 is "Zzyzx Rd"
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 09:56:03+00:00): Zzyzx is pretty famous, actually:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zzyzx%2C_California
(although it certainly gave me a WTF moment moment when I first saw the sign while driving past!)
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:19:14+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640116
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-07 08:01:23+00:00): You can join https://www.opengeofiction.net/ to map fictional lands. Here it will be reverted.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:19:25+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640160
metagascar (2021-12-07 02:14:32+00:00): bro this is not Vandalism, it's a real city
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-07 02:24:30+00:00): Please stop.  The OpenStreetMap community will not permit this vandalism.  Go to OpenGeoFiction if you want to create a fake map.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:31:11+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640194
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:31:20+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640206
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:31:27+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640246
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:31:34+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640253
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:31:43+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640271
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:39:50+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640284
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:39:57+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640327
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:40:03+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640361
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:40:08+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640398
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:40:13+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640435
Frans S (2021-12-20 13:55:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
buildings should be considered detached. not attached to each other.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640472
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-12-21 02:21:03+00:00): Hi Sir, Hope you're doing great, and thank you for reviewing this project. I have fixed the warnings (it's an auto-fix). Would you mind telling me where is my mistake? Because based on OSMcha (link the below), my works are good enough. Thank you, Sir.


https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640071/
https://osmcha.org/changesets/114639692/
Frans S (2021-12-21 08:27:21+00:00): Hello Fanny. Thanks for your reaction.
As a matter of fact, your mappings are quite accurate and squared. My point is about a few buildings, mapped as a rectangular, but should be mapped as a building with an extention. ( 6 nodes)
You also connected lots of buildings together with their nodes. We cannot see from the imagery if they share walls, so exept when it is obvious they share walls, like terraced buildings we should concider each buildings as a detached house. ( in JOSM press the ctr key down while drawing the building to avoid connecting nodes.) 
My comments were a bit to harsh sorry for that
Best regards
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-12-21 09:05:38+00:00): Hi, Sir. Thank you for your explanation. That's very detailed. 
Happy mapping!
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:40:19+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640497
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:58:42+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640617
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:58:48+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640638
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:58:54+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640651
vulasala (2021-12-07 08:59:01+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640672
vulasala (2021-12-07 09:00:59+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640701
vulasala (2021-12-07 09:01:06+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640751
vulasala (2021-12-07 09:01:12+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640766
vulasala (2021-12-07 09:02:01+00:00): Hi Gerico0317,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114640786
Kovoschiz (2021-12-07 06:38:58+00:00): Please don't upload test objects. If it's used for maintenance personnels, use `railway=crossing` + `access=private`.
ravali_78 (2021-12-07 06:03:48+00:00): Hi Ron_Languian,
I have removed duplicated highways.Kindly check with way 1009773159,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114644214.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114641258
Kovoschiz (2021-12-07 06:48:58+00:00): Please don't delete to directly connect stairs.
Rakkka (2022-02-10 10:35:24+00:00): 交差点に右折用の～型の道路のウェイが追加されている件ですが、この記述は他で見かけないのですが、ウィキのどこに記述があるか教えていただいてもよろしいでしょうか。
私が見たところ、交差点の説明には見当たりませんでした。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Rakkka (2022-02-14 22:56:27+00:00): 追加されたウェイを一つずつ削除するのは大変なので、ご返信がないようならすべてリバートすることになりますがよろしいでしょうか。
Johnwhelan (2024-02-02 20:02:15+00:00): The residential highways seem to bare no resemblance to the imagery
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-08 09:49:36+00:00): Please respond to changeset comments.
ironspock (2021-12-11 08:34:59+00:00): Hi luja, personally I think that all parts of this changeset are still in construction even parts of it are looking completed. It is and will be still a construction site (= can not be used) for some years until the tunnel will be completed as well (as far as I remember this should be until year 2030). ironspock
Warin61 (2021-12-08 05:32:10+00:00): Hi,

You have buildings within buildings.. that is an error. Possibly one of the 'buildings' is a building:part=*? 

I have 'fixed' duplicated nodes using JOSM Validator tools - automatic.
Maradona11 (2021-12-08 21:26:39+00:00): thanks for pointing that out.
I go with current tags (building:levels) from now on.
Frans S (2021-12-20 16:03:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114642836
user_5359 (2022-01-05 17:04:12+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eOg. What is the meaning of the key ntom ?
Frans S (2021-12-22 15:18:54+00:00): Hello. Messaging over TM4 has problems. Task 8
Please correct your mappings here.
Buildings should be mapped individually and tagged as building=yes
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2021-12-15 10:33:59+00:00): Please don't upload personal map data. This is vandalism.
mavl (2021-12-07 15:54:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы уже второй раз удалили линию разобранной железной дороги.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163381248/history   
  
Почему она вам не нравится?  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:railway=abandoned?uselang=ru
A Hall (2022-03-08 18:04:31+00:00): FYI, 'Minor/Unclassified' indicates a road with connectivity but with low importance. You had upgraded Cat Lane from Service to Minor/Unclassified. Since Cat Lane is a dead end street giving access to a commercial business, service seems appropriate. I've reverted this change.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 12:46:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884876572
landuse=planned jest bardzo rzadkim kluczem. Jeśli proces budowy jeszcze się nie rozpoczął, lepiej i radzimy nie używać w ogóle żadnych znaczników.
Po rozpoczęciu budowy należy użyć:
man_made=construction
construction=tower
gdy budowa jest zakończona, użyj:
man_made=tower.
z poważaniem,
Marc.
(DeepL translation)
adas (2022-01-05 13:10:55+00:00): Ja zmieniłem istniejące construction na planned. Bo generalnie ten projekt chyba został porzucony (przekroczył koszty i o nim miasto zapomniało). Chyba nawet do usunięcia.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 13:18:13+00:00): Dzięki za informacje!
Ale może w takim razie lepiej byłoby całkowicie usunąć projekt z mapy?
Teraz nikomu się nie przyda, a na mapie i tak go nie widać.
ququruzka (2021-12-26 18:46:19+00:00): добрий день.
вже не вперше помічаю, що ви займаєтесь перейменуваннями вулиць на невідому мені мову.
Треба зазначити, що на усій території України діють правила нанесення вулиць, бульварів, провулків, проїздів, тощо виключно державною мовою. в разі недотримання цих правил, ваші зміни будуть відкочені без зазначення причини.
дякую за розуміння.
mueschel (2021-12-11 15:20:12+00:00): Hi,
the tags you used here are not used in other places. I recommend to not add the operator names to a node, but simply add them as 'operator' to the two parts of railways adjacent to the node.
Frans S (2021-12-27 09:57:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You mapped clusters of buildings and tagged them as 1 building.
Please be more precise and accurate.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114646951
HSL_HRT (2021-12-07 07:30:30+00:00): Espoon kaupungin 10.06.2013 vahvistetun Gobbacka - nimisen asemakaavan muutoksen mukainen katualueen
nimi  Vanha Gobbackantie - Gamla Gobbackavägen ja osoitteet otetaan käyttöön viikolla 49/2021.
Uusi Gobbackantie on rakentunut asemakaavanmukaisesti. Vanha kapea Gobbackantie muuttuu samalla Vanhaksi Gobbackantie- nimiseksi puistoalueen poikki kulkevaksi tieksi, josta ajo tonteilla.
Gobbackantien ja Gobbackanrinteen risteykseen asennetaan lisäopastekylttejä.
vanagaudi (2021-12-07 10:28:31+00:00): Du hast vergessen zu erwähnen, dass eine Ladesäule nur in der Zeit Jan-Nov nutzbar ist :-D
jimmyhendrix (2021-12-07 10:47:09+00:00): Stimmt, guter Einwand :-D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
ovruni (2021-12-07 22:22:05+00:00): Hola asyabokshtein, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado vías que no parecen no existir de acuerdo con las imágenes aéreas, otras que generan cruces de vías y otras con trazos que no parecen existir, hay algunas escaleras que se han dibujado como ángulos agudos, ademas de no haber escaleras en ese lugar, dado que son rampas, algunas vías de peatones se encuentran cruzando vía de muros y ha agregado un puente que no existe, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
asyabokshtein (2021-12-26 15:26:39+00:00): Hola! Thank you for the comments, understood. My goal is to connect the bus stop locations to the roads with walking permissions, but I will be more careful with my future changes
ticki_52 (2021-12-13 21:33:55+00:00): Hallo Mangobonbon, die Buslinie 360 wird im Verbund BW-VVS bereits verwendet in einer anderen Region des VVS (->Backnang). Der Abgleich mit dem aktuellen VVS-Fahrplan zeigt, dass die Buslinie ab Geislingen Bhf -> 350 <- heißt. Bitte mal anschauen und korrigieren. Vielen Dank. Grüße
francians (2021-12-07 19:04:25+00:00): Ciao,

ne avevamo parlato, le piste ciclabili non hanno foot=yes .. metti Path e togli foot=yes

Grazie mille per il contributo
Francesco
francians (2021-12-07 19:06:10+00:00): Idem come l'altro contento, poi un pezzo di strada già c'era... Non puoi limitarti a caricare il tuo GPX e ignorare i dati già in OSM

Francesco
kawino85 (2021-12-07 09:24:00+00:00): Mapping this way doesn't work.
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 20:49:41+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 20:49:44+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 20:49:46+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 20:49:49+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478
Владимир К (2022-02-20 12:44:55+00:00): Пожалуйста, не надо рисовать парковки на всю дорогу, когда парковка только в карманах по бокам. это не соответсввует действительности и затрудняет дальнейшие правки
Владимир К (2022-02-20 12:47:13+00:00): и прилеплять парковки к дороге с одной стороны тоже не надо
pesec (2022-02-20 13:36:54+00:00): Пожалуйста уточните на конкретном примере в чем ошибка и как, на ваш взгляд, должно быть.
Frans S (2021-12-20 14:50:18+00:00): Hello. U an sorry to say that your mappings are not in line with the requirements.
Buildings should be mapped as individual buildings. Not clustered.
Tagging of buildings is building=yes.
Your mappings are reverted.
Best regards
alyaa_hossam (2021-12-12 12:42:18+00:00): Dear StephanyGA;
I noticed that you moved a lot of streets to avoid crossing buildings with streets and that's not correct, but, you can use the best satellite imagery to draw a building and don't move the street.
Regards,
alyaa_hossam
StephanyGA (2022-01-10 21:25:05+00:00): Dear alyaa_hossam,
As per our training with the German red cross, we were instructed to edit the roads that are overlapping the buildings, also most of the other satellite imagery are shifted which affects all of the buildings that's why we are using "bing" satellite most of the time.
Regards,
Stephany
alyaa_hossam (2022-01-11 13:28:57+00:00): Hello StephanyGA;
Thank you for your reply and your efforts in OSM, please give attention to your edits for sharp angle and streets alignment
Regards
alyaa_hossam