piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2021-02-15 08:29:40+00:00): It is OSM good practice that when corrections are needed they are done to existing ways. Please do not delete existing ways redrawing them in order to introduce modifications. In doing so you delete all the historical record of the existing way. 

In these deletions, you've inadvertently deleted the history of original contributors, the dates, mapping editors used, positions of nodes, the imagery used, tags and placement of nodes. As it is now the history has gone forever.

I had originally thought your fixme tag was on test or temporary lines to assist mapping. Seeing now what has happened I think it would be good to revert these deletions, reinstating the original mapping. The original line (that hold the fixme tags) can be amended and your replacement lines removed. This would reinstate the historical record and be in keeping with OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
Allison P (2021-02-15 00:52:58+00:00): Can you check some of these numbers? Just glancing at this one house seems to be tagged with addr:housenumber=2.
Sifu Hotman (2021-02-15 02:07:52+00:00): Yes I will take a look at it this evening. Thanks for catching that. I use the Street Complete App from F-Droid.
BCNorwich (2021-02-15 08:34:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for correcting the terrain. Now the track needs to be correctly aligned, unjoined from the grass area outline and connected to the highway Way: 25333615 at the west end.

Regards Bernard.
conifermapper (2021-02-15 17:40:05+00:00): Ok ,will do that today.
BCNorwich (2021-02-23 08:06:22+00:00): OK nothing corrected so I've made corrections.
kutukola (2021-02-15 11:52:46+00:00): "Kayyum İşgali Altındaki" kısmını siyasi mesaj olarak kabul etmiyorum. OSM'nin güncel veri verme gibi bir amacı olduğunu da göz önünde bulundurursak yanlışlıkla herhangi birinin Rektörlük Binası olduğu yanılgısına kapılıp içeri girmesi gibi sorunların da önüne geçmeye faydası olacağı kanısındayım.
eggie (2021-02-14 21:35:52+00:00): Beste user.. Gwef concreet aan svp wat je edits inhouden  .. lokale kennis is je bron  source=local=knowledge
Lokale mappers willen graag wten wat je hebt gedaan.
Probeer ook je editgebied iets kleiner te houden. Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade.

MVG
eggie
busfotodotnl (2021-02-14 21:44:30+00:00): Dank vooor je hulp. bron is https://www.utrecht.nl/fileadmin/uploads/documenten/wonen-en-leven/verkeer/goederenvervoer/Voertuigbeperkingen_20Utrecht_202009_1_.pdf  gecombineerd met checks via streetview
dktue (2022-03-07 12:42:25+00:00): Siehe auch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118195987
Arun Madhavan (2021-02-15 06:59:01+00:00): i am not sure which reference you are using for these ward boundaries ? If the election commission images, I request you to wait for some time. Election commission will soon release corrected maps. Atleast in high ranges we have seen the boundaries to be completely wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99267629
SomeoneElse (2021-02-15 10:34:51+00:00): Hello,
It looks like a few bits of "Peak District Boundary Walk" got accidentally added into the national park relation here.
I've removed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99300763 .
Best Regards,
Andy
bxl-forever (2021-02-15 18:14:05+00:00): Hello,
Sorry but I had to revert this.  You changed the capacity of the 3 small U-racks.
capacity=35 is for the Villo! station, which is already properly mapped.
rriemann (2021-02-16 09:15:01+00:00): Thanks for your vigilance! I'll try to find out if the interface of the app streetcomplete needs improvement to distinguish different bike parkings.
lefuturiste (2023-06-23 09:05:18+00:00): ça été ré ajouté car quelqu'un l'a supprimé
replace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3176762063
conradoos (2021-11-23 18:34:59+00:00): Czy przystanek Rondo Waszyngtona 51 na pewno istnieje? Została zgłoszona uwaga https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2945212 że go nie ma. Na mapie WTP też go nie widać.
hauke-stieler (2021-02-14 22:16:15+00:00): Falscher Hinweis unter "source". Richtig ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2538185
eggie (2021-02-15 07:07:44+00:00): Tip..
Beter Straatkijk van google niet als bron gebruiken. Dat is niet toegestaan en kan problemen geven. 
Straatkijk van www.mapillary.com is wel toegestaan. 
MVG
eggie
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:15:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for this.
Just a note on access, if general access is set as private then that implies the same value for all other modes of transport, they don't need to be set explicitly unless they are different to general.
map per (2021-02-15 13:04:30+00:00): Der Strommast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8423757081/history) ist eher power=pole als power=tower oder?
Strubbl (2021-02-15 17:24:24+00:00): Korrekt. Ein Strommast in der JOSM-Vorlagensuche ist nicht gleich dem Strommast in iD.
Ich habe es für insgesamt 3 Strommasten abgeändert, siehe CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99324842
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 14:47:30+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Thanks for keeping this bit up to date.
On here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155081015
you've left lots of tags relating to the car park. Also, this overlaps with the other park in this position. Perhaps this should be removed and the outline of the other park adjusted.
And does Playhouse Square really go through the park like that?
JayTurnr (2021-02-15 18:05:41+00:00): Remove?
Glassman (2021-02-15 06:53:31+00:00): #TIP: after removing the building=construction, add in building=yes or something appropriate. Can you fix this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99269870
DZ-OSM (2021-02-15 07:32:35+00:00): Should be fixed by Changeset: 99286921 now. Thanks for pointing it out.
Glassman (2021-02-15 15:46:07+00:00): Thanks
andi9876 (2021-02-15 15:03:39+00:00): Hm Dear, why not stop? Your edits not make sense!
Wrong name tag.
Deleted.
kbruen (2021-02-14 23:20:55+00:00): Correction: the tag is usage=branch, not railway=branch
andi9876 (2021-02-15 15:03:24+00:00): Hm Dear, why not stop? Your edits not make sense!
Wrong name tag.
Deleted.
karson_ (2021-02-15 15:35:03+00:00): The residential polygon you marked was already contained inside a larger one for the whole Stratford Crossing neighborhood. I went ahead and tried to make the landuse a bit more granular and add some of the roads to the northwest which will probably be constructed at some point.
eggie (2021-02-15 07:02:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 



Feedback  De facebookvermelding van de oude bakkerij staat nog steeds vermeld.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
BouweV (2021-02-15 07:12:10+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor je feedback en info! 
Ik heb de Facebook vermelding nu ook aangepast. 

Gr
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-15 02:07:59+00:00): Hi, unpaved is a general "I don't know what this surface is, but it's not paved" tag. If you did a survey here you could make it more precise
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99270621
neomanic (2021-02-15 03:12:38+00:00): Hi ScottWalkerAU. I regularly go along these tracks, and it varies in surface. I made this change looking at the key:surface wiki; none of it corresponds to gravel as described there. 'compacted' is probably most accurate, but there are sections that just turn to clay when wet. My guess is that aggregate gets dumped in any holes and it gets graded once every few years. The Australian tagging guidelines suggest unpaved as a good option, but I agree I could do better by adding a smoothness tag. I will grab some photos when I am next out there and post to the talk-au list to discuss if you think that worthwhile.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99270621
eggie (2021-02-15 07:04:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
ALu68 (2021-02-15 21:16:22+00:00): Hello SMAS PERSADA PEBENAAN,

Welcome to OSM. Please read the wiki first https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

It's not clear what do you want to map - look at first to the map features https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

Meanwhile I remove the node - add a new when you know what to map - your data is still present in the database history: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8423856181/history

Regards. Andre
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-15 11:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99303778 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely naming edits near Sarajevo following a number of DWG complaints. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99196845
SomeoneElse (2021-02-15 09:02:51+00:00): Hello again MTB FORIS,
As previously suggested, please talk to the local community about the best way to map things in OpenStreetMap.
Privately I've already suggested:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only to see how to use names - also look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator .  With regard to MTB tagging please look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking and especially https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale .  Also consider asking how to tag these sorts of things at https://help.openstreetmap.org/ .  If you can't tag according to OSM's standards we'll have no alternative but to prevent you making changes to OSM for a period of time.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse (2021-02-15 11:11:59+00:00): Pozdrav još jednom MTB FORIS,
Kao što je prethodno predloženo, razgovarajte s lokalnom zajednicom o najboljem načinu mapiranja stvari u OpenStreetMap.
Privatno sam već predložio: https: //wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only da biste vidjeli kako se koriste imena - također pogledajte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator. Što se tiče MTB označavanja, pogledajte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking i posebno https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale. Razmislite i o tome kako da označite takve stvari na https://help.openstreetmap.org/. Ako ne možete označiti prema OSM-ovim standardima, nećemo imati drugu alternativu, osim da vas sprečimo da vršite promene na OSM-u na određeno vreme.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Andy (iz OSM-ove radne grupe za podatke)
SomeoneElse (2021-02-15 23:32:08+00:00): Hello again,

(in response to private message received by the DWG)

Perhaps it might help if I gave examples of how mountain bike routes are mapped within OpenStreetMap?

Here's one example, in Poland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12116204 .  That's been added to OSM as a relation, and that relation is made up of lots of individual pieces, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336548100 .  The name of the route is stored in the name of the relation, because the individual pieces don't have names themselves, but the route does.  Among those "tags" that you can see on that relation the most important ones are "route=mtb" and "type=route" - those are what tells everyone that this is a mountain bike route, not just a series of ways with names.

Another example that I know in England is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5699311 .  That is much larger, and many of the roads and tracks that it goes over have their own name, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26953459 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429291352 .  Again, the relation has a name and has "route=mtb" and "type=route" tags on it.

Another (incomplete) example that I've just updated is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12207954 .  In addition to the same relation tags as before I've added an "operator" tag for the organisation that built and signposted the trail, and also a "website" tag - it may be useful for you to add those to your trails.

With the correct tagging in place, these trails show up on maps such as https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!54.3277!-0.5331 which show mountain bike trails.

Notice that in none of these cases has the route name been added to the name of the road or track in OSM, and none of the names are in capital letters, because that's not how names are recorded in OpenStreetMap.

As I've already said elsewhere, if you would like more help then please look at previous questions at https://help.openstreetmap.org/ , and if nothing matches ask for further help there.  https://openstreetmap.community/ also suggests that there is a Telegram group locally to you; you can also try asking in that.

Best Regards,

Andy
opendcc (2021-02-15 09:11:36+00:00): Hallo,
bitte die Änderungssätze auf ein kleineres Gebiet beschränken. Danke.
eggie (2021-02-15 07:29:01+00:00): Dag Polundra,

Zodra er gebouwd gaat worden kun je de periodieke BAG import versnellen door een verzoek toe doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818859#p818859
Het staat nu nog op bouwvergunning verleend.
Een vlak landuse=construction heb ik even toegevoegd. 

MVG
eggie
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-02-15 15:33:39+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! ☺
Your changeset is quite large: it ranges from Germany to the United States. Consider synchronising StreetComplete before travelling long distance to avoid notifying too many contributers.
Have a nice day ☺
SafetyIng (2021-02-15 09:44:24+00:00): Hey,
könntest du deinen ÄNderungssatz zukünftig benennen? Dann können auch andere Mapper verstehen, was für ÄNderungen vorgenommen wurden.
Ansonsten: Der Handwerksbetrieb wäre eher im Tag: craft=hvac anzusiedeln - oder?
ralley (2021-02-15 02:27:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, looks good to me.  The only thing I noticed was that you added the address when there is already a node with that address.  It's not a major problem but you could have merged the existing node with your building outline or just left the node inside the outline and not added address info to the outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99273006
alanlapthorn (2021-02-15 02:53:36+00:00): @ralley - thanks for the info.  I've merged the two and have found https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice - I think I wanted to get an edit in so quickly after doing the tutorial.
Rufus Green (2021-02-15 10:44:13+00:00): Very Probable name as Hedge Lane would only run 500m from Pikehall if it didn't extend beyond Mouldridge Lane. Hedge Lane would have been the most level and direct route to from Pikehall & Gotham to Aldwark (and maybe Brassington/ Longcliffe)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-02-16 23:08:54+00:00): edição revertida
mapper999 (2021-02-20 14:21:47+00:00): Hi, 
das war der Sensor der Höhenkontrolle (siehe auch den note-Tag an dem Knoten), der in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91192544 fälschlicherweise ein highway=speed_camera bekommen hatte. Ich habe den Punkt wiederhergestellt und korrigiert. Bitte das nächste Mal vor dem Löschen alle Tags anschauen. Danke und weiterhin viel Spaß.
mapper999
snowy@osm (2021-02-20 22:40:49+00:00): Danke für die Berechtigung
Tresho (2021-02-15 08:13:02+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, qual'è la fonte di questa modifica? Questa strada fa parte a tutti gli effetti della T4-T9, è ad alto scorrimento e pericolosa per pedoni e ciclisti ai quali infatti è vietato l'accesso. Perché ti ostini a modificare la classificazione di strade che evidentemente non conosci (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96281927)? Non voglio essere polemico o farti problemi ma non si può fare finta di niente dopo queste modifiche. Addirittura le rampe di accesso le hai messe come residenziali.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-15 14:01:07+00:00): sono passato di la ma il cartello superstrada non lo vedo
Tresho (2021-02-15 14:30:49+00:00): Capito, grazie per la risposta. 
Non esiste la superstrada nella normativa italiana, quindi non c'è un particolare cartello.
Se ti riferisci a tangenziale, il cartello non c'è (e non c'è su tutta la T4-T9) perché la strada non è classificata ufficilamente come tangenziale, infatti è anche chiamata informalmente "bretella".

Se vediamo cosa dice la wiki per highway=trunk (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Equivalenze_internazionali): "Strade che si pongono a metà strada tra Autostrade/Tangenziali e le Statali. Può anche essere classificato così il tratto di svincolo di un'autostrada-tangenziale che porta al centro città. [...] Le cosiddette superstrade potrebbero essere marcate come due corsie denotate da highway=trunk per distinguerle dalle autostrade."
Quindi direi che il tag migliore sia highway=trunk_link visto che collega la T4-T9 con il quartiere con una serie di rampe.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-15 15:58:50+00:00): hai ragione, ora eseguo il revert
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-15 16:00:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99320985
Tresho (2021-02-15 17:03:52+00:00): Perfetto, grazie
JayTurnr (2021-02-15 03:33:05+00:00): A slight mistake in selection caused this large box. The mistake was fixed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99274841
karson_ (2021-02-15 15:04:01+00:00): Hi,

A road like this would be best described as a frontage road. A road which is parallel to a higher priority road and where all buildings are addressed with the higher priority road. Usually caused by road realignment.

In this case, the front entrance to these houses is off the frontage road. Usually the front entrance is highway=residential and the back entrance is service=alley. It doesn't make that much sense to have to drive down an alley to get to your house. 

I assume these houses are addressed XXXX MLK Jr Pkwy. Usually there will be a street sign to mark the name of the frontage road. Not sure if there is one in this case?

In my opinion, even if the street doesn't have a street sign, it is best practice to give it the name=* tag so that routers can find there way to the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99274836
jgruca (2021-02-16 01:14:57+00:00): Agree -- it looks like this frontage road is referred to as MLK Jr Pkwy in surveys as recently as 2012. (Search TIDRICKS ADDITION on landrecords.polkcountyiowa.gov for these public records.)
gocyclones (2021-02-18 13:00:32+00:00): Ok I’m currently running every street in Des Moines so I’ve been to this location and there is no street sign indicating a name of the frontage road so I didn’t run it. I’ve since went back and ran the road. Just trying to help others that are also running all roads with better data. I don’t see a tag for frontage road. What tag would you recommend or just reverting my change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99274836
SekeRob (2021-02-19 11:28:22+00:00): Hi,

got here thru a global 'first use' report after correcting some coding tags which all have e.g. Golf when OSM requires them all in small i.e. golf. Got slapped as the paths do not connect other then to themselves ('island car' it's called) which I will ignore most of the times.

Noticed all holes carry the full name of the club. Everywhere else they use tags such as hole 1 or just #1 as name which then actually renders nicely when looking at the map with the carto.fr layer selected. Link https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=&zoom=16 then select layers at right. There's so much hidden from view in the standard ID editor.
Just curious how mappers around the world do things differently.
ciao
andi9876 (2021-02-15 15:00:07+00:00): Hm Dear, why not stop? Your edits not make sense!
Wrong name tag.
Deleted.
MakeItBetter (2021-02-16 00:43:06+00:00): "Short sections of grade separated, divided highway that are not connected to a regional network of grade separated, divided highways should probably have the same classification as the highway they are part of. This may differ from the classification implied by AASHTO or FHWA (AASHTO/FHWA standards are only able to imply the classifications for OSM roads as they do not have any authority over OSM)."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification

This edit and others like it will be promptly reverted. OSM classification is function based and does note necessarily follow government designations.
Roadsguy (2021-02-16 02:02:33+00:00): The very paragraph you quoted contradicts the edit you just made. This section of freeway (alongside the Brookshire Freeway) *are* connected to the greater freeway network.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 14:39:27+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Thanks for adding this, good to have up to date details on things like this.
The point you've added is very close to Virgo, are all the locations of the shops there correct? Are they all still there?
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 14:46:22+00:00): Hello hasaan22,
Just to let you know: It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858835996/history was added by someone accused of fictional mapping (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11940952 ) who I'm now reverting. Can you please check that any edits that you have made have not been unduly influenced by previous fictional changes by this mapper?
Best Regards,
Andy, from the DWG
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 14:46:44+00:00): سلام hasaan22 ،
فقط به شما اطلاع می دهم: به نظر می رسد https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858835996/history توسط شخصی متهم به نقشه برداری خیالی اضافه شده است (به http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion- مراجعه کنید) نظرات؟ uid = 11940952) اکنون چه کسی را برمی گردانم. آیا می توانید لطفاً بررسی کنید که هیچ ویرایشی که انجام داده اید تحت تأثیر تغییرات خیالی قبلی این نگاشته کننده قرار نگرفته است؟
با احترام،
اندی ، از DWG
Arun Madhavan (2021-02-15 06:51:09+00:00): no it is better to avoid giving name in full caps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99278433
mmd (2021-02-22 10:44:52+00:00): Vehicles can still drive through here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=34.60694%2C-111.90337%3B34.60572%2C-111.90271#map=19/34.60639/-111.90305

Maybe add some restriction to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8424248419
andi9876 (2021-02-15 14:58:34+00:00): Hm Dear, why not stop? Your edits not make sense!
Deleted
banban_msm (2021-03-15 00:43:27+00:00): Is there a Masjid Ar Rahman beside the Dewan Serbaguna? I just could not see it.
Arun Madhavan (2021-02-15 06:54:51+00:00): ration shop the tag is wrong. Cant you check and correct
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99282841
Arun Madhavan (2021-02-15 06:55:18+00:00): avoid giving name in call caps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99283078
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
mueschel (2021-02-18 12:15:35+00:00): Hi,
could you check this area? It got two strange tags.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
amuppidi (2021-02-15 06:23:13+00:00): added sidewalks in stone ridge north. added streams and natural woods in stone ridge/Kirkpatrick farms community. fixed placement of roads in stone ridge.