piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2020-12-02 19:55:24+00:00): Hola Jorge. porqué haces que el techo cubra todo el largo de la bodega? en la foto se ve que no es así. Qué intentaste hacer?
Jorge Yañez (2020-12-02 22:01:16+00:00): Hola Felipe, donde esta el techo seria toda la zona de carga que tiene esta bodega es por eso por eso que la agrande un poco
felipeeugenio (2020-12-02 22:14:35+00:00): ok, pero zona de carga no es techo, por favor no confundir.
Hans Thompson (2020-12-08 01:08:11+00:00): Why did you remove the State Examiner's Office? This is a very large edit that should have been split up.
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-02 21:27:56+00:00): Regular mapping, repair account used unintentionally
adamsc (2021-11-16 13:44:02+00:00): Hej,
Zastanawia mnie tagowanie tej roślinności na rondzie i w okolicy jako landuse=garden , trochę absurdalnie to brzmi. Bardziej chyba pasuje: landuse=flowerbed
NieWnen (2021-11-16 15:50:31+00:00): Na wstępie krótko: Jeśli na tym rondzie znajdują się tylko kwiaty, to myślę, że możesz śmiało zmieniać.

--
Z tego co pamiętam landuse=flowerbed kiedyś miał na celu tagowanie obszarów kwiatowych, które zostały posadzone tak aby tworzyć pewną "kompozycję". Np jakieś wzory/flagi/czy nawet "obrazki", które przedstawiają coś konkretnego. Takie często bywają w "ważniejszych miejscach", placach, centrach miast itp.

Może się to zmieniło, albo mogłem pomylić z innym tagiem.

Zgodzę się, że leisure=garden wygląda na taki co tu nie pasuje. 
A jak przetłumaczymy, to w ogóle brzmi absurdalnie.
Z tym tagiem ogólnie jest trochę problemów i sporo dyskusji z nim było, bo jest używany do różnych rzeczy. 
Same "ogrody domowe" (residential) wywoływały z nim spore kontrowersje.

Na szczęście są jeszcze garden:type i garden:style i to może być coś, czym może powinniśmy się zainteresować. Jak nie ma odpowiedniego tagu, to można zacząć i dodawać nawet coś, żeby określać taką zieleń.
I chyba nawet zacznę tak robić, bo nawet jeśli potem ktoś stwierdzi, że i tak potrzebny jest nowy tag i takowy wejdzie, to łatwiej będzie to odfiltrować i zmienić masowo.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:style

Problem jest taki, że jak dla mnie nie ma do tego odpowiedniego tagu na "zieleń przyuliczną" niebędącą trawnikiem, albo większym obszarem typu skwer/park itp. W skład takiej zieleni wchodzą i krzewy i kawałki trawnika i kwiatki i inne jakieś przyziemne rośliny (drzewa myślę, że można pominąć).

Na większości takich rzeczy zauważyłem, że jest używany landuse=grass albo właśnie leisure=garden.

Niestety landuse=grass nie zawsze się może sprawdzić, bo czasem zamiast trawnika jako bazy jest żwir, kora (czy jak to się fachowo nazywa) itp.

Ja używam tego drugiego – jak jest coś więcej niż trawa itp. choć też wolałbym, żeby był na to lepszy tag. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606260#p606260

Tu jest jeden z powodów dla, którego używam leisure=garden.
Archgineer (2020-12-03 15:51:28+00:00): Why did you make changes in such a large area?
Routes of Power (2020-12-07 11:33:33+00:00): Because the landuses were related.
Is anything wrong with http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95173312 ?
btwhite92 (2020-12-27 03:51:39+00:00): Hello,
This edit changed a handful of roads that provide access to specific properties (Hinton & Iceland roads, at first glace) from 'service' to 'track'. An unpaved road is not automatically tagged as a 'track' - only those which are primarily used for forestry and agricultural purposes. Please see this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack - specifically the section "highway=track versus other classes of highway=*"
Bradley
iandees (2020-12-03 00:56:37+00:00): Can you say where you got these addresses from? Is there a government map you're looking at?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95173589
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-03 14:37:09+00:00): i'm getting the addresses from Zillow and local maps from the Erie County Government website. Tbh it's not hard to easily look up the address and find out yourself like seriously. :/
iandees (2020-12-03 14:43:43+00:00): Can you give a link to the site you're using, please?
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-03 14:44:56+00:00): https://public.eriecountypa.gov/property-tax-records/property-records/property-tax-search.aspx you can easily type in the addresses into this website to confirm if their real and find out themselves or even do searches on realtor sites that sell the homes.
iandees (2020-12-03 14:52:54+00:00): Right, but how did you know that these buildings at this location had these addresses? There's no map showing location.
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-03 14:56:30+00:00): like i said for the second time, realtor websites that sell the homes will tell you like http://zillow.com/ shows you the exact land and the zipcode and everything. Plus, I literally live in Erie County like dude it's seriously not hard to look up an address of a building and draw the building and put the address in man. If you want more proof i don't got any, it can easily be searched on your own, i don't have to keep giving information that you can easily do a quick google search on. Thanks. -Kyle
iandees (2020-12-03 14:59:52+00:00): So you're looking at Google Maps and Zillow to get the address for these buildings?
Jakethedog2004 (2020-12-03 15:02:51+00:00): @iandees it’s not hard to look up an address man or look at street view of a street and find it.
iandees (2020-12-03 15:29:17+00:00): I understand how to map. I'm just curious how you're doing it.
clay_c (2020-12-03 16:56:50+00:00): Google Maps is not an acceptable source for OpenStreetMap data. While it may be easily available for free, its copyright license is unfortunately incompatible with OpenStreetMap. You may not use data copied or derived from Google Maps or Google Street View in OpenStreetMap.

Have you been using Google data as a source for mapping? If so, to what extent?
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-03 16:59:20+00:00): I never said I used Google Maps I said you could always do a quick google search for this information. I've been getting my information for my addresses off Real Estate websites and also if its a store I go to the stores website to get the address or do a quick google search, I never said I used Google Maps.
andrewwiseman (2020-12-03 18:20:13+00:00): You also aren't supposed to copy other websites like Zillow. Here is more info on that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#2._Contributing
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-03 18:21:35+00:00): how am i supposed to add an address to this site then xD
andrewwiseman (2020-12-03 18:23:48+00:00): The beginners' guide has more info on that where it says Sources of information https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1
andrewwiseman (2020-12-03 18:25:40+00:00): You can also join the OpenStreetMap US Slack, people there can explain in more detail how to map and what not to do https://slack.openstreetmap.us
Xevi (2020-12-02 19:21:06+00:00): Relacionat https://www.diaridegirona.cat/girona/2020/12/02/girona-tanca-passarella-font-rei/1076800.html
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-02 21:28:33+00:00): Regular mapping, repair account used unintentionally
unter umständen (2022-07-16 10:21:45+00:00): das geschäft liegt direkt an der straße
Milhouse (2025-05-09 23:34:21+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your awesome work tagging so many solar panels - I've been trying to add more myself to keep the count up to date.
On this changeset I noticed a module count that looks several times too big. I'm not sure:
1) Whether to cut them down to a single node with a more accurate module count
2) Preserve all the nodes and reduce the module count accordingly
or 3) wait for you to point out something I missed!
These are the nodes in question, all attached to the same building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188418038
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188418053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188418033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188418066
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408386
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408410
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188418036
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188408370
Thanks,
Steven
SK53 (2025-05-11 09:32:36+00:00): Hi,

No these look OK. Each group of modules is arranged as 4 rows of 10, so module count of 40 is correct. The idea of mapping each group separately is that it makes it much easier if one wants to convert them to areas.

At present a useful way of checking module counts is to draw lines along each axis and use the measurement tool to see how long they are. Most modules installed these days are 1.6 by 1 m, so look for multiples of these (in this case, each group is roughly 16 by 4 m). Older ones were 1.6 by 0.8 or 0.9 m, but new larger ones will screw up these rules of thumb. I use measurement when the actual count is difficult to obtain from aerial imagery (here the 10 columns are visible, but the 4 rows aren't). 

When I did this mapping solar panels were not that easy to spot in London. I had a target of achieving 50% of the numbers present in the FIT data. Since then I've raised my game and managed over 95% for Wales. It does depend a lot on imagery quality, and it looks as though good quality imagery may become scarce in. OSM editors.

Regards,

Jerry
Milhouse (2025-05-12 07:59:33+00:00): Ah, brilliant, thanks for the tip about measuring the dimensions of the panels. I didn't know any of that. I'll have to revisit the ones I added in the last week or two to check I haven't undercounted lots!
I didn't hear about loss of high resolution imagery, that would be a shame!
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-02 21:28:44+00:00): Regular mapping, repair account used unintentionally
mike140 (2020-12-03 09:10:55+00:00): в отношение границы природного парка надо добавлять линии мультиполигонов, а не сами мультиполигоны
andergrin (2020-12-03 10:21:39+00:00): Ого, це все міняє. Модна якось додати лінії цього мультиполігону, не виділяючи їх знову вручну?
mike140 (2020-12-03 10:48:38+00:00): Да - надо сначала открыть окно свойств отношения парка, потом выделить одну из линий мультиполигона который надо добавить - в окне Reltoolbox на этом мультиполигоне правой кнопкой мыши - выбрать участников - они появятся в окне отношения парка  - нажать одну из кнопок в середине окна для добавления новых участников и нажать кнопку сортировки слева
highflyer74 (2020-12-02 21:25:41+00:00): Auch hier massenhaft Löschungen von detaillierten Informationen. Höre bitte auf zu mappen, bis geklärt ist, was hier und in diversen anderen Changesets schief gelaufen ist. Desweiteren benutze bitte aussagekräftige Kommentare für Deine Änderungen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Nakaner-repair (2020-12-03 21:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 95249809 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass deletions without proper explanation (changesets 95176432, 95175332, 95175281, 95145333, 95042962)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95175281
Nakaner-repair (2020-12-03 21:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 95249809 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass deletions without proper explanation (changesets 95176432, 95175332, 95175281, 95145333, 95042962)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95175332
alix_geovelo (2021-10-21 09:28:01+00:00): HI,
I saw you add a cycleway:right = track on Via del Fontanite which is not still in place. We had information from a user that there are no cycleway there so we deleted it.
Best regards
Nakaner-repair (2020-12-03 21:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 95249809 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass deletions without proper explanation (changesets 95176432, 95175332, 95175281, 95145333, 95042962)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95176432
karson_ (2020-12-02 21:18:21+00:00): The way should be tagged as either a parking aisle or a service road. It is not a living street. 

Some things that imply it is not a living street: it is not named, it is not a public road, it doesn't go anywhere. Living streets basically don't exist in the US.

Things that imply it is a parking aisle: it is on private property, there are parking spots on either side, the road doesn't lead anywhere only to more parking
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-02 21:29:10+00:00): Regular mapping, repair account used unintentionally
highflyer74 (2020-12-02 21:19:42+00:00): Moin! Würdest Du bitte aufhören, im grossen Stil Objekte zu löschen? Warum machst Du das?
Frans S (2020-12-10 11:45:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here .
Please improve your mapping skills. Hardly a single building is mapped correct and squared.
I copy you a PM with More info and tips how to improve your mappings.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-12-04 09:50:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please map buildings individually. Not as clusters.

Best regards
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-02 21:29:26+00:00): Regular mapping, repair account used unintentionally
mahdi1234 (2020-12-17 17:34:53+00:00): cau,

viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dparking pouzij parking=underground a pripadne muzes upresnit i dalsi vlastnosti. Building tam nepatri.

mahdi
EneaSuper (2020-12-03 15:54:47+00:00): Ciao, che scopo aveva esattamente questa galleria?
fedc (2020-12-05 02:11:10+00:00): Ciao, era una galleria tranviaria.
Esiste tuttora, ma l'ingresso è sbarrato da cancelli.
EneaSuper (2020-12-05 12:03:19+00:00): Capito, interessante, grazie della delucidazione 😁
Vinber (2020-12-06 11:47:50+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution,
un petit mot d'accueil : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

à vous lire
Glassman (2020-12-04 01:27:30+00:00): Tip: remove the tag access=private. That should completely open up the driveway. It's kind of a redundant tag since driveways are by definition private. But removing it will allow routers to use it. 

BTW - it looks like Amazon's employee may have added the driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95178400
Alan R 1994 (2020-12-04 16:31:12+00:00): Thanks, will do -
muchichka_s (2020-12-07 11:27:56+00:00): malicious highway tag change
Iancito (2020-12-04 12:46:36+00:00): Je ne comprend pas pourquoi le cadre est si grand il ne me semble pas avoir fait d'ajouts d'éléments au delà de "Thlluru".
dzidek23 (2020-12-03 08:56:49+00:00): Hi Jeb,
I see you started with a rather large object. You've done a great job but I'd like to suggest couple of improvements.
If you replace somebodies work please check if any tags are accurate and could be reused. Previously Robert Whittaker used Building=school to clearly make it a school building, your object is just building=yes.
Where possible try to use "make square (S)" on buildings to make sure right angle corners are 90 degrees.
Finally if you know the site, add as much detail as possible. Paths, roads, fence, hedge, gates, play fields etc. That is valuable information not visible to sofa mappers like me :)
eggie (2020-12-03 05:56:16+00:00): Hi Mns Nainde Jardin  Please don't make edits all over the world in one upload.
Shifting the map may harm the map!

Greetz,
eggie
MonsieurNaindeJardin (2020-12-04 21:05:14+00:00): Hey eggie,
Ok! Thanks for the information. I'm sorry I didn't realise, but it makes sense. I don't have that much experience yet! Is there any way to come back on the edits or is my edit there forever?

Good evening,
MrNaindeJardin
eggie (2020-12-04 21:48:58+00:00): Hi MrNaindeJardin..
Fortunately there is no damage... :)
The problem is selecting objects and shifting the map is done by the left mousebutton. So stick to one street and than upload.

The edits will be there for ever but don't worry..
Every mapper was a starter. :)
If you like it's possible to revert this changeset.
Let me know.

Hakuna Matata
eggie
OSM community the Netherlands
user_5359 (2020-12-03 18:10:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
CLASE=DEVESA
Id=0
SUPERFICIE=2.13
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
diegocidras (2020-12-05 12:23:18+00:00): Hi, thank you. I have imported a few land uses I made on a GIS for 'O Souto' forest. As soon as I can I will revise those tags you've mentioned, which are useless for OSM. Cheers.
mavl (2020-12-03 15:29:02+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
PhysicsArmature (2020-12-07 03:52:14+00:00): I hope my comment made sense. I labeled bathrooms. The raw tags show they are Male Only and Female Only. The map preview that everyone knows OSM by demonstrates a Unisex logo. This could look like vandalism of OSM data unless someone did some digging.
abakus_uploader (2020-12-03 23:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kubahahaha (2020-12-04 02:11:31+00:00): Przenosiłem adresy z bunktów na obrys budynków. JOSM nie zgłosił mi błędu, poszukam które dokładnie adresy to były
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-23 17:19:52+00:00): Czyli wszędzie ma mniej niż 2 metry szerokości? Tak dla potwierdzenia przed skasowaniem błędnego tagu bicycle.

Może miejscami łapie się na dopuszczenie z ponad 2m szerokości i ponad 50 na drodze?
Ltrlg (2020-12-02 23:22:47+00:00): Source : oublié Esri (bâtiments récents).
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-03 08:58:13+00:00): Ciao Michele. Mi chiedo perché disegni gli edifici separati quando invece sono attaccati. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95181769
kewl (2020-12-03 08:05:39+00:00): Is the park (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880422579) a park or just someone's garden?
user_3961358 (2021-01-30 09:54:20+00:00): Someones garden...
BCNorwich (2021-03-12 08:50:36+00:00): Hi, Are you sure these are tracks? They look like field edges to me, maybe there are paths on the field edges. Tracks are where vehicles can go.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Warin61 (2020-12-05 07:57:06+00:00): Hi,

This changeset added areas to the relation of 'St Helena Village'. Where did you get the information that thesse areas are part of 'St Helena Village'?
GIS MCC (2020-12-09 23:41:02+00:00): Sourced from local government
Warin61 (2020-12-10 23:14:29+00:00): Local government data usually includes copyright statements that are not compatible with use in OSM.
Horza (2020-12-26 17:55:04+00:00): If you right-click on a building outline the third option down is a square tool.
mavl (2020-12-03 15:30:24+00:00): Hello. This changeset fixes nothing. What do you want to fix?
Reeniz (2020-12-03 00:59:58+00:00): No ingresar nombres falsos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95183017
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-22 18:22:40+00:00): Jesli będziesz w okolicy (lub pamiętasz miejsce) to paczkomat inpostu jeszcze czeka (bo most nim nie jest - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174303353/history )
mavl (2020-12-03 15:30:59+00:00): Hello. This changeset fixes nothing. What do you want to fix?
jimkats (2020-12-04 22:12:26+00:00): Πολύ γενική περιγραφή του changeset, τι ακριβώς άλλαξες; Φαντάζομαι μετατόπιση δρόμων; Καλησπέρα κιόλας :d
0000FF berries (2020-12-05 11:29:46+00:00): Καλησπέρα και στους δύο :)
Πληροφοριακά, οι αλλαγές φαίνονται και μέσω achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95183537
jimkats (2020-12-05 14:13:56+00:00): Σε ευχαριστώ πολύ berries, έψαχνα αυτό το εργαλείο αλλά δεν θυμόμουν πως λέγεται.
mavl (2020-12-03 15:31:39+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
mweper (2020-12-03 11:20:32+00:00): Hola Esteban. Tengo dudas del cambio de etiqueta abandoned por disused. ¿Como sabes que están en recuperación esas vías? Me interesa mucho esa fuente de información.
He pasado por allí ayer y por lo que yo he visto in situ, esa zona tiene las vías tapadas con tierras y no se ven porque están reacondicionando para añadir una zona de artesanos y veredas, además de que las vías férreas están hace décadas sin usar.
ndm (2020-12-03 22:50:23+00:00): Not sure what's happened here -- this was carefully mapped from an GPS and ground survey -- there are no tunnels -- bridges have been deleted and items that are visible on mapillary -- from the ground survey.

Is there any reason not to revert this?
Nathan_A_RF (2020-12-03 22:59:22+00:00): There are no bridges over the paths, these are covered passages or tunnels you could say. Some minor tweaks have been made where appropriate but the smaller roundabout in particular was way out of line.
ndm (2020-12-03 23:04:09+00:00): I think that the smaller roundabout was drawn using ETSI clarity -- Bing just has a different offset you may need to adjust it.

Bridge over cycletrack
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.5431677334852&lng=-2.6358287002277905&z=17&pKey=9CSHVr57GXzXMp4Zzaduyw&focus=photo
mavl (2020-12-03 15:32:05+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
mavl (2020-12-03 15:32:40+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 12:58:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8189237138/history has S=GPS key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Supaplex (2021-04-17 05:50:14+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
blackboxlogic (2020-12-04 03:05:35+00:00): Names are good for public titles of things. Names like "House" and "Driveway" don't contribute any meaningful information and is more like clutter. I've removed those names.