piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2017-01-24 13:33:41+00:00): ...
Oder mal beim Maintainer der öpnv-karte.de nachfragen, was dort schon verfügbar ist?
Gruß,
Toni
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-23 17:22:31+00:00): Hi dragan jurcic, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind removing so many mapped highways in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45389606
PT-53 (2017-01-28 07:27:16+00:00): Hallo GPSMassa,
Du hast bei Erstellung des Kreisverkehres auch 4 Ways ohne Tags eingezeichnet:
Beispiel:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467911558#map=19/47.92318/9.25620  Im OSM-Inspector wird deshalb jetzt diese Fehlermeldung angezeigt:  http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.25520&lat=47.92297&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags   Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?  Grüße
PT-53 (2017-02-02 08:44:47+00:00): Hallo GPSMassa,
kümmerst Du Dich noch um die "ways_without_tags", oder soll ich die einfach löschen ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-02-04 08:24:58+00:00): ways_without_tags gelöscht, da Mapper nicht reagiert
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_6110846 (2017-09-26 09:53:27+00:00): Доброго дня.  Виправіть помилки у даній правці самі. Ви порушуєте http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Names 

nazwa jest tylko nazwa
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Ropino (2021-08-19 11:43:13+00:00): Hallo,
das Straßenstück von der Carl-Hopp-Straße ist bis kurz nach dem Bahnübergang mehrfach mit "Schwarzer Weg" beschildert. (Stand 10.08.2021)
In der Historie wurde bereits 3* die Benennung geändert:
original war es "Schwarzer Weg" (12.06.2007)
22.07.2013 Änderung -> "Am Bahnhof Bramow" durch KVLA-HRO-Kro
02.09.2015 zurück auf "Schwarzer Weg" durch "EM311"
23.01.2017 Änderung -> "Am Bahnhof Bramow" 
(bis heute)
Könnte es sein, dass die Informationen des Katasteramtes nicht zur Bezeichnung vor Ort passen ?
VG Robert
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2021-08-19 13:01:21+00:00): Danke, laut unserem Straßenkataster sollte dies wirklich zusammenhängend der "Am Bahnhof Bramow" sein. Ich leite das einmal an die Kollegen zu Überprüfung weiter!
Znaika (2026-02-08 12:30:35+00:00): Zurückgesetzt als separater Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7244283335 und nicht zum ganzen Pfarrheim
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:28:56+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
AgusQui (2017-01-24 15:44:21+00:00): Hola fkchaud, en el name de las estaciones de servicio no va la marca (YPF, Shell, etc),  eso va en la etiqueta brand que ya tienen las estaciones que editaste. Veo que estas usando MapsMe, esa aplicación aún no soporta el tag brand, por eso no estás pudiendo ver este dato.
fkchaud (2017-01-25 05:59:46+00:00): Ah, perdón. Estoy seguro de que las había visto así en Chile, y por eso me extrañó que no estuvieran acá y los puse. ¿Hay alguna aplicación para android que sí soporte dicha función?
AgusQui (2017-01-25 13:34:49+00:00): Sí, OsmAnd muestra la marca de las estaciones, incluso tiene la posibilidad de buscar por marca y/o tipo de combustible, con la comunidad nos tomamos el trabajo de traducirla al español argentino con lo que es posible buscar los combustibles por sus nombres comunes aquí: súper, euro, gnc etc. 
La app no es tan bonita como MapsMe pero tiene muchas más funciones.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
mrpulley (2017-04-02 14:10:28+00:00): I'm just making it clear that these edits are based on information obtained while visiting Berlin in person.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Supaplex (2017-01-23 16:42:51+00:00): Hi
請不要隨意更動公共設施的名字，已經有石碇老街了
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:28:59+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:21:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-14 16:38:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:19:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
nereocystis (2018-06-30 16:30:05+00:00): You reverted my change to Fallon Street
Fallon Street (308000810, v3)
Changing it back to an alley from a secondary link.
It's definitely not an alley, but a real, one way street
It probably should be a tertiary road, as should the rest of Fallon in this area.
The rest is marked residential, which is not quite true.
Let's agree, then make a change.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44199896#map=19/37.79220/-122.26760
oba510 (2018-07-01 02:53:24+00:00): Hmm. It's a very narrow, straight street with no sidewalks, that can't be more than 15 feet wide at the widest point. It looks like an alley to me. I would expect a link road to look more like an offramp or slip lane. There are plenty of public streets classified as alleys. (It also looks like it might technically be part of Embarcadero, not Fallon, based on the assessor's map at http://www.acgov.org/ms/prop/maps/BK018/0180435.00.PDF )

I would agree that the rest of Fallon shouldn't be tagged as highway=residential, but tertiary seems excessive to me. It's only a couple of blocks long and almost a dead-end street. It's not a through-route to anywhere and doesn't have much traffic. I would tag it as unclassified myself.
nereocystis (2018-07-01 04:37:23+00:00): As I review my notes, I'm not sure about the name. I don't think that it shows up on the assessor's map. This street is north of the railroad, in real life. Embarcadero, both on the assessor's map and in real life, is south of the railroad.

I don't remember whether there is a street sign for this section.

I'll try to check.

I used to use this road every day, on my bicycle. 

The wiki definition of alley doesn't seem quite correct. 

This street connects to Oak, and seems like more than an alley.

An alley or alleyway is a narrow service road usually located between properties to provide access things such as back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas. Alleys are normally found in urban areas and often run between the rear sides of buildings such as houses, and commercial premises.
nereocystis (2018-07-01 05:09:36+00:00): On the other hand, there is a second abandoned railroad which ends behind the San Francisco BART Oakland place, on 25 4th Street. Maybe that is the first railroad. That explains the location of Victory Court.

Embarcadero West is south of the railroad, in the current real life, but perhaps the old Embarcadero did run along the railroad.

There are many addresses missing from the assessor's, such as 260 Oak Street. 

I think the assessor's map is not reliable.
nereocystis (2018-07-31 21:19:17+00:00): Still investigating the name of the street.

Oakland DOT suggested that I request a street sign via SeeClickFix, and that will force the city to find out the correct name of the street.

I have done so, and here is the request:

https://seeclickfix.com/issues/4738434-no-street-sign-at-oak-st-and-fallon
nereocystis (2018-09-06 03:23:32+00:00): Keith Schuerholz, of the city of Oakland confirms:

It's Fallon Street.
SK53 (2017-01-24 14:06:27+00:00): Just happen to be looking at recent edits around Nottingham and would like to remind you that we are meeting in the Lincolnshire Poacher tonight in case you wanted to come along: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup. Plenty of us are interested in footpaths.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:52:08+00:00): isso está certo?
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:13:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:13:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:12:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
tyr_asd (2017-04-20 20:44:19+00:00): FYI: Another User reports that this drinking water fountain doesn't exist: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/969761
taxi301 (2017-01-27 08:50:57+00:00): narobiłeś bałaganu na Kamiennej w Kołobrzegu
krzyncio (2017-01-27 09:09:52+00:00): Jest to możliwe, bo troszkę to na czuja robilem, nie znając do końca narzędzia. Liczyłem, ze ktoś to wyedytuje. chodzilo mi o zaznaczenie, że jest tam ścieżka.
krzyncio (2017-01-27 09:10:39+00:00): Jakby co moge usunąć te zmiany.
taxi301 (2017-01-30 05:57:13+00:00): poprawię to , na razie poczytaj to co Ci przesłałem , jak zainteresuje mogę podesłać więcej ciekawych materiałów .pozdrawiam
krzyncio (2017-01-30 07:42:05+00:00): Bardzo dziękuję :) Oczywiście chętnie zapoznam się z wszelkimi materiałami.  Impulsem dla mnie było to, że dostrzegłem brak ścieżki rowerowej wzdłuż Grochowskiej a ona tam już jest kilka lat. Treningowo zrobiłem tę nieszczęsną Kamienną z myślą, że ją wyedytuje jak sprawdzę dokladny jej przebieg w terenie.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:12:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2017-01-23 11:59:48+00:00): Welkom (terug) op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-23 12:01:20+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik even gekeken of er een BAG update verricht kon worden.
Er staan (op dit moment) nog 2 gebouwen welke status vergunning aangevraagd hebben. Deze zijn nog niet ingebracht.
eric_ (2017-01-23 14:15:45+00:00): Would it not be better to map these Community Gardens as an area, as they would be visible and the name would appear on the map.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Владимир К (2017-01-23 12:15:04+00:00): А почему гастроном department_store?
SK53 (2017-01-23 12:55:36+00:00): I think I'll merge this node back to the original one (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27565066/history) to retain the history (for instance the original one has a wikidata link)
SK53 (2017-01-23 15:06:38+00:00): Ok have done that (so your pop figure is on old node). There are large cities genuinely missing from Nigeria, see the Nigeria section of my blog post here: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/urban-areas-2-derivation-from.html. Unfortunately there are big gaps in the aerial imagery and clouds on landsat. This might be a gap where a university-based project could achieve more leverage. I've followed you on twitter.
SK53 (2017-01-23 15:08:22+00:00): One other thought about Ibadan. There are lot of things mapped as hospitals which probably aren't: clinics & health centres etc. There's a tendency for mappers to use amenity=hospital because it shows up prominently, but it makes the data much less useful for many purposes.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:09:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Graf Westerholt (2017-04-05 13:51:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467956357

Hier ist ein Durchgang? Nicht dass ich wüsste.
Graf Westerholt (2017-04-05 13:52:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467956358

„Reine Außenbestuhlungsflächen gastronomischer Betriebe ohne Gartencharakter und ohne die Möglichkeit, eigene Speisen mitzubringen sind keine Biergärten und sollten auch nicht als solche erfasst werden.“ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=biergarten
Reclus (2017-04-05 15:18:04+00:00): Den Durchgang habe ich von vor längerer Zeit in Erinnerung. Ich war zwar vor kurzem vor Ort, habe den Durchgang aber nicht prüfen können. Falls er nicht mehr vorhanden sein sollte, darfst du das gerne korrigieren. Dafür brauchst du auch keine Änderungssatzdiskussion anzustoßen. Das ist entweder richtig oder falsch.

Das Drucklufthaus schreibt auf seinen Webseiten selbst von einem Biergarten und aufgrund der umgebenden Bepflanzung sollte eigentlich niemand den Gartencharakter in Zweifel stellen.

http://drucklufthaus.de/ueberuns.php

Ob Speisen mitgebracht werden dürfen oder nicht weiß ich nicht. Ich vermute aber, dass das in den "Biergärten", die hier im Ruhrgebiet so bezeichnet werden, selten erlaubt sein wird. Da sollte also eher das Wiki der (außerbayerischen) Realität angepasst werden statt dass alle Biergärten außerhalb Bayerns gelöscht werden sollten.

Könntest du bitte in Zukunft mal etwas selbst recherchieren bevor du Änderungssatzdiskussionen anstößt? Ich finde das völlig überflüssig, zeitraubend und nervend.
Graf Westerholt (2017-04-05 16:37:08+00:00): Ich finde es nicht überflüssig, denn soweit ich weiß, wird das, was du als „Biergarten“ eingetragen hast, mit leisure=outdoor_seating getaggt: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=outdoor_seating Unter Beispiele steht ausdrücklich, dass so etwas keine Biergärten sind. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=cafe#Stra.C3.9Fen-Caf.C3.A9
user_6110846 (2017-08-15 19:00:22+00:00): Поясніть звідки ви взяли назву масиву ? за авторитетними джерелами дозволеними вона є інша .
Vanuan (2017-08-17 08:37:18+00:00): Офіційна адреса така:
Одеська область, Овідіопольський район, село Лиманка, "Ж/М Ульянівка", масив Радужний. (наприклад, реєстр юридичних осіб, реєстр речових прав на нерухоме майно)

Окрім цього є назви ЖК (житлових комплексів): Райдужний, Райдужний-1, Райдужний-2.

Буква "й", мабуть, є зайвою. Але хтось постійно додає. Вочевидь, забудовники російськомовні, тому замість перекладу виходить транслітерація з російської.
Hjart (2017-01-23 13:22:10+00:00): Jeg vil typisk bruge "bådebro" til sådan en, da det kommer tættest på.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:08:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
literan (2017-01-25 10:56:08+00:00): При чем здесь бумажные статусы "федерального значения"? да хоть межгалактического. Теги назначаются в зависимости от реального статуса в дорожной сети, ознакомьтесь с правилами, действующими в российском сегменте проекта OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification Ваша правка будет откачена, как противоречащая правилам.
Hjart (2017-01-23 17:55:58+00:00): Det er fint nok, som du har gjort med gangbroen
Hjart (2017-01-23 13:18:57+00:00): Bemærk at p-pladsen af de forskellige routingmaskiner ikke i sig regnes for navigerbar og at veje og stier derfor skal forbindes direkte til hinanden i stedet for til kanten p-pladsen.
Владимир К (2017-01-24 06:14:08+00:00): не пишите русские названия в английские.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 11:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52728321 or 52726410 where the changeset comment is: Revert several changesets whose sources are either stredax.dbnetze.com or Signalsoft.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Владимир К (2017-01-23 14:18:21+00:00): не нужно писать "кафе" в название, это видно из тегов
gileri (2017-01-29 22:27:29+00:00): Hello,
Opening hours in OpenStreetMap must follow the format described here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
This let other applications such as GPS display them nicely and know whether the POI is open at the moment.
Goufre (2017-02-05 11:42:27+00:00): I have changed the opening hours to the required format
gileri (2017-02-15 18:04:25+00:00): Nice, thanks !
literan (2017-01-24 11:25:28+00:00): motor_vehicle=no это означает, что шлагбаум заварен, и там никто проехать не может. Если въезд по ключам или разрешениям - то это motor_vehicle=private
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-01-23 16:36:42+00:00): O correto é não abreviar os nomes como Av.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 11:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52728321 or 52726410 where the changeset comment is: Revert several changesets whose sources are either stredax.dbnetze.com or Signalsoft.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 19:58:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-23 19:58:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-09 07:09:59+00:00): [Alabang] add college and BonChon branch
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 11:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52728321 or 52726410 where the changeset comment is: Revert several changesets whose sources are either stredax.dbnetze.com or Signalsoft.
Владимир К (2017-01-23 14:12:10+00:00): А почему адреса по сулакскому проезду вокруг Мухтарова тупика?
user_5359 (2017-01-23 19:57:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can’t open your homepage, but if you are delivery service or pizza, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-01-23 13:23:13+00:00): Typo on changeset comment. This edit is done from a Android phone.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 11:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52728321 or 52726410 where the changeset comment is: Revert several changesets whose sources are either stredax.dbnetze.com or Signalsoft.