piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchanka (2022-07-26 08:04:45+00:00): bonjour
Dans le wiki le denotation=park n'est pas indiqué.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:denotation
Cependant on voit dans Taginfo qu'il est quand même utilisé : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=denotation#values

Du coup je pense que les deux sont acceptables. Pour ma part j'aurais quand même tendance à utiliser urban puisqu'il est plus utilisé et documenté.
Mitza Lizalor (2022-08-02 13:09:43+00:00): Ok, je pensais la même chose. Merci !
JeroenHoek (2022-07-27 20:00:54+00:00): Waarom haal je hier amenity=shower weg? Is deze verwijderd?
BertMule (2022-07-28 09:38:18+00:00): Mijn interpretatie is dat dit geen PUBLIEKE funktie is, maar een intern bedrijfsmatige voor de betonning.

Het gaat mijns inziens te ver om dat soort dingen weer te geven, aangezien dat verwarring kreëert.
Het heeft ook geen zin om hun toiletten weer te geven.
JeroenHoek (2022-07-28 10:23:45+00:00): Het gebouw maakt deel uit van de voorzieningen van de Terschellinger haven:

https://www.terschelling.nl/haven-terschelling/de-haven-van-terschelling_45824/

Je haalt dus zaken weg zonder te weten of ze er gewoon mogen zijn op de kaart. Dergelijke voorzieningen voor klanten of bezoekers van de haven vallen gewoon binnen de kaders van wat in kaart te brengen valt.

Herstel je de tags weer?
BertMule (2022-08-01 17:32:45+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,

Dank voor je achtergrondinformatie.

Ik interpreteer het nu als bedoeld voor de werkhaven.
Ik kon net in StreetView zien dat het juist vanaf de noordkant toegankelijk is, i.t.t. tot wat ik verwachtte.
Te vroeg geïnterpreteerd dus.

Ik heb er een point aan toegevoegd.
Ik weet niet of dat de voorgaande manier was.
Even kijken hoe het er uitziet.

Groet,
Robert
DressyPear4 (2022-07-31 10:14:35+00:00): Olá, cada objeto possui etiquetas específicas, não adicione várias em uma só geometria
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124060442
archie (2022-07-25 16:57:27+00:00): Wieso setzt du hier einen Node ein, der dasselbe Beschreibt wie die Tags fuer das Gebäude? 
Sei so nett und radiere deine völlig ueberfluessige Node.
archie (2022-07-25 16:57:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075487253
folle (2022-07-25 19:52:47+00:00): Da hast Du recht, werde ich löschen. War vorhin vor Ort und habe den POI schnell aus OsmAnd hochgeladen. In meiner offline Karte mit Version 01.06.2022 ist dort nur eine grüne Wiese ;-)
archie (2022-07-25 21:36:23+00:00): ..ah, dann verstehe ich wie so etwas zustande kommt. Vielen Dank. Auf gutes, weiteres Gelingen!
user_5359 (2023-04-11 06:33:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on your import. You add ways with foreign keys
desc='levelThreeRoad'
length=575.470056000000000 (we don't need any length information)
or nodes with
desc	'secondaryRoad'
height	0.000000000000000 (always 0 -> useless)
name	路
x_coord	111.509376433 (nodes have coordinates no need to repeat them)
y_coord	36.078191851

Please correct your change set.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 03:15:26+00:00): Hello.
There are a couple of issues with your edit.
Other than names and a few other exceptions, values for tags should always be in lower case.
Additionally, multiple values are always separated with ";". Also there must not be trailing period.
Finally, that tag must include only colors and nothing else.
So instead of "colour=Black top, grey." it should be "colour=black;grey"
It would be great if you corrected these problems.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124060750
demon_box (2022-07-27 17:09:57+00:00): ciao!, non si mappa mai l'indirizzo sull'intero edificio perchè per la legge italiana il civico identifica soltanto l'entrata all'edificio e non l'intero edificio (che potrebbe avere anche più entrate e quindi più civici)
se proprio sai con certezza dov'è posizionata la porta d'entrata con quel civico puoi taggare l'indirizzo su un nodo sul perimetro del poligono edificio, altrimenti si tagga un nodo vicino ma staccato dall'edificio con tutti i dati dell'indirizzo. ho già effettuato la correzione. grazie, BuonMapping!
Frans S (2022-09-04 12:36:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124061562
nickjohnston (2022-07-25 17:04:25+00:00): Re-used a previous changeset comment by mistake. The comment for this change should have been:

Removed incorrect addr:street usage on two ways.
SekeRob (2022-07-25 18:20:56+00:00): Hi, Bienvenue a OSM.

Really makes a lot of sense to map a bus stop in France and a restaurant in SE Asia, to you, but not to everyone else who get's this contribution listed at the top of their edit history view for the next couple of days until the next one comes along and updates the Blu elephant in Scotland and the toko they saw in downtown Jakarta, during their holidays, in 1 session.

Pretty please do keep an edit session in one place, save it and then move on to the next place. Only local mappers are interested in reviewing for correctness, can test against their local knowledge.

MTIA
MxxCon (2022-07-27 02:34:47+00:00): There's a different business here, but they kept old business' facebook address? This seems strange. Could you please explain what is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124062114
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:16:37+00:00): I see where I missed removing the old Facebook contact info. Trans Am cafe closed 2 years ago. I was Ridgewood just last month. All my geo tags are locations I have been to before or in areas I frequent. I have been told before only in person verification is allowed for this map.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 20:18:27+00:00): You have been told by whom?
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:22:16+00:00): Other map moderators. I was told and read that no verification from 3rd party sources like Google maps or Yelp. The application of rules is inconsistent so just trying to get familiar.
IsStatenIsland (2022-08-09 00:00:39+00:00): When you made the crosswalk across Broadway on the north side of 67th, you connected it to Track 3 on the subway. The terminal of the crosswalk happened to be near the way for the track.

This seems to be a common problem in the iD editor.

I've fixed it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124661305
Szewah (2022-08-09 13:23:10+00:00): Thanks for correcting. I'll keep an eye out for this going forward.
nw520 (2023-03-19 21:45:19+00:00): Der Buchschrank existierte bereits als n4231538790. Ich habe das mal zusammengeführt.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 02:57:50+00:00): A door with name Zou Zou’s?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124062894
MxxCon (2022-07-27 02:32:42+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124063223
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:10:27+00:00): Person survey of the area I did a 4  months back when I was there. I have business in Nashville as an artist and photographer.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 20:25:18+00:00): So you remember name, exact location and address of so many random businesses in the middle of nowhere, but don't remember a single phone number or working hours or website?
This story seems rather outlandish.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:36:29+00:00): This is not in the middle of nowhere. It’s a tourist attraction as it was the last hometown of country music legend Johnny Cash. Also I didn’t add those things as I have seen it is not a priority by anyone on this map. I can add it if it is that important. Thanks
MxxCon (2022-07-27 02:31:23+00:00): Hello.
You changed buildings into parking lot, but left all the other POI in place. Parking is 4.8 meters tall and is named "Bonello's New York Pizza"? That doesn't seem correct. Could you please elaborate on this change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124064108
willkmis (2022-07-27 04:39:43+00:00): Hi Eddie,
It looks like you were correctly trying to delete these demolished buildings. As MxxCon pointed out, there are some other tags associated with the old buildings that can be safely removed, like their heights and names. In cases where the building has been knocked down, it's actually usually better just to delete the old buildings entirely and draw new versions of whatever has replaced them, like the parking lot here, since the lot doesn't really have the same geometry as the old building footprints anyway.
Best,
Will
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:07:23+00:00): Ok. Yes. I see the error. I moved Bonellos because tag was placed in wrong location. I did not notice one of the parking boxing was still named Bonellos.
ALu68 (2022-07-30 11:49:48+00:00): The name is the name only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Newhouse aka New House
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081231657#map=19/59.13392/-3.23239&layers=N
The Orkney Map (2022-07-30 14:40:29+00:00): Both names are in use locally
ALu68 (2022-08-08 20:46:38+00:00): As you say: two names.

The value for the name key is the name only - not <one name> + " aka " + <the othe name>
see list of name keys https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_keys

Look at your passport, can you see there
"Dr Mark Smith aka The Orkney Map" ?

"Don't tag for the renderer" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
b-jazz (2022-07-27 14:41:41+00:00): Please make sure that houses with 90 degree angles are drawn with 90 degree angles. iD has tools that will square up your area if you right click on the area.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 02:27:17+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of all this information?

Also could you please elaborate why did you change many building=commercial to just "=yes"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124065050
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:05:01+00:00): This is my neighborhood. I did a walking survey to ensure the businesses are there. 

The yes on the building was a mistake. I don’t remember placing that there. I just added the historic building designation.
MxxCon (2022-07-30 01:10:49+00:00): but you still didn't fix these damaged tags..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124065050
StefanHRT (2022-07-26 01:43:57+00:00): Hi,Schau mal auf Mapillary, da gibt es recht aktuelle Fotos in 360° wo auch die Haltestellen alle enthalten sind ;) Kannst auch nur diese Fotos anzeigen filtern
LockOnGuy (2022-07-25 18:57:14+00:00): Please stop adding duplicates, also stop sending cuss messages.. 
what you add is already mapped. I’ve told you that already many times. Stop and communicate!
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-25 19:01:52+00:00): This is not a duplicate
The one you have set the name is an area
it is polygon
The one I put is a point
it is not duplicate
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-25 19:03:17+00:00): Plus, I am not cursing .
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-25 19:05:27+00:00): For example 
you can browse to a certain place on the map and you will see 100 points for a simple shop
but this national hero is bothering you to appear in the ethnic language ?
Is this fair to fight ONLY 1 point in a whole state ?
LockOnGuy (2022-07-25 19:07:07+00:00): It doesn’t matter, still a duplicate, please stop adding duplicates, I don’t have time to clean after you!   
then what do you call your messages? Love messages telling me bad words? Do you want me to share the screenshots?
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-25 19:11:57+00:00): In the past ?
or now ?
gscholz (2022-07-27 05:28:31+00:00): Hi enekorga,
this changeset has added an error to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines (brown crossing):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.73899&lat=43.04504&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124065546

Can you please fix this? You can avoid such errors if you use JOSM as an editor, because it shows warning messages in case of such errors.

A lot of these landuse areas are overlapping each other very often, this is not high quality mapping. Can you please fix this as well?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2022-09-13 10:07:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124065594
mcliquid (2022-09-04 11:19:28+00:00): Hallo ORemmert und noch etwas nachträglich herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast in diesem Changeset die komplette Kehlender Straße von der Karte verbannt, in dem du ihr das "highway=residential" genommen hast.

Ich habe dies wieder hinzugefügt und die Straße zusätzlich als Fahrradstraße ausgewiesen.

Hier findest du meine Änderungen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125768543

Schau die zum Thema Fahrradstraße gerne diese Wikiseite an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road

Viele Grüße
chnuessli (2022-09-04 09:28:32+00:00): Sali Habi

Gibt es für die Defis in dieser Gegen noch mehr Infos?
habi (2022-09-05 09:57:15+00:00): Ciao Christian

Was meinst du mit 'mehr Infos'?

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9910272343 hängt an der Aussenwand des Camping-Empfangs-Shops-Hauses, was ich so erfasst habe.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9910272357/ hängt beim Restaurant, neben dem Eingang
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9912789893 ist unter dem Vordach des Toilettengebäudes vom Camping.

Alle drei Defis habe ich erfasst, als wir ein langens Wochenende um den Klöntalersee rum in den Ferien waren.

Gruss,
Habi
habi (2022-09-05 12:19:03+00:00): Ich hab' jetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125806602 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125806687 (via mapcomplete.osm.be) mal noch ein paar weitere Details hinzugefügt
chnuessli (2022-09-07 11:54:57+00:00): Sali Habi

Passt perfekt so. Vielen Dank
rempshaener (2022-08-04 15:09:04+00:00): Hallo,
wieso machst du frische Änderungen auf Grund von Abriss/Neubau rückgängig? Du hast hier das Gebäude in den vorherigen Zustand versetzt und Nebenbauten sogar wieder gelöscht.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2022-08-04 15:09:19+00:00): Es betrifft https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853315884
daniel_k (2022-08-04 18:07:14+00:00): Tut mir leid, meine Informationen sind wahrscheinlich veraltet.
daniel_k (2022-08-04 18:08:58+00:00): Beziehungsweise das Luftbild ist veraltet. Es stimmt nicht mehr mit der tatsächlichen Situation überein.
rempshaener (2022-08-05 15:59:27+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe es wieder angepasst.
Für Langeoog liegt m.E. derzeit Esri vor Maxar und Bing, auch wenn Maxar die aktuellsten Bilder hat.
Viele Grüße
lyctkel (2023-12-03 10:37:20+00:00): Hi Rom1,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9910306544 you wrote recycling:glass_bottles=survey;Ortho HR
I suppose that's a copy/paste error and you meant
recycling:glass_bottles=yes.
Regards lyctkel
Rom1 (2023-12-03 20:48:20+00:00): Hi lyctkel, thanks for warning me about this mistake. It's corrected.
lyctkel (2023-12-03 21:45:02+00:00): Hi Rom1,
thanks for fixing it.
Regards
lyctkel
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
MxxCon (2022-07-27 04:03:04+00:00): Hello.
layer=-1 implies it's underground and I'm pretty sure that's not the case here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124066795
kw-ny (2022-07-27 13:59:00+00:00): fixed in changeset  124143168 to make it layer = 0 ... not sure why it defaulted to -1, wasn't conscious choice, I think it's because it's crossing a transit shelter.
MxxCon (2022-07-27 14:09:58+00:00): If that's the case then the shelter should be tagged as layer=1.
kw-ny (2022-07-27 15:57:47+00:00): Ah yes, good point, didn't know this, fixed in changeset 124147973
Bierphysik (2022-07-26 18:22:32+00:00): Hi. Den typ highway=bicycle_road gibt es nicht, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road
Habe das umgetagged in bicycle_raod=yes und highway=path. Vll schaust Du nochmal drüber: siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124108349
streckenkundler (2022-07-27 11:26:10+00:00): Hei, das Verkehrszeichentool http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=244.1 nennt zwar für Fahrradstraße auch hw=path, das haut meiner Meinung nach aber nicht hin. Bei den hier vorliegenden Wegen würde ich stets je nach Art und Lage highway=track|residential|service mit bicycle_road=yes setzen, da z.B. im Anliegerverkehr (ider z.B. forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr) PKW, LKW, ect. zugelassen sind. Der Fahrradverkehr hat aber demgegenüber Vorrang.
Das Problem ist auch, daß das Vorhandensein von bicycle_road=yes z.B. auf der https://www.opencyclemap.org/ nicht gerendert wird, was ein Manko ist. 

Sven
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 11:35:51+00:00): Dass das nicht gerendert wird ist natürlich doof, aber wir mappen nicht für den Renderer ;)

Path hab ich einfach nach Augenmaß via der Sat-Bilder gesetzt. Wenn da track oder service besser passt, dann das. residential sehe ich da nicht.
streckenkundler (2022-07-27 12:02:50+00:00): eben :) ...und  mit hw=path + bicycle|foot=designated erscheint dann diese "lustige" blaue gestrichelte Linie... Es ist wirklich sehr schlecht, daß bicycle_road=yes da nicht verarbeitet wird... Ja und das ist ein Fehler, der gerne im Zusammenhang mit https://www.opencyclemap.org/ gemacht wird, weil man eben den blauen Strich sehen will.
way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171356081 dürfte z.B. service sein (wegen Forsthaus und so)

Fahrradstraßen haben hier in der Region in den letzten Jahren stark zugenommen, oft zusammen mit Zusatz-Zeichen wie 1020-30 oder andere...
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 12:33:20+00:00): Ok. Passt Du das an?
streckenkundler (2022-07-27 12:42:16+00:00): Kann ich nacher machen... Ich schaue mal mit Overpass Turbo.

Sven
streckenkundler (2022-07-27 14:05:47+00:00): erledigt. Es waren nur die drei...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124143280

Sven
Krteček (2022-07-29 19:32:18+00:00): Hallo,
danke Euch für das Diskutieren und Lösen :-)
Ich merke mir das Tagging der Radstraßen für künftige Edits.
Die besuchten Wege sind nach Definition im wiki mit "path" sicherlich richtig getagged. Vor Ort erscheinen sie - leider ohne Ausnahmen-Schild(!) - als geschätzt 3,5m breite "service" oder "grade1" welchebei unserem Besuch rege durch Forst und Anlieger genutzt wurden.
Ein Abschnitt mit Wohnhäusern ist dem Augenschein nach "residential", die Schilder sagen Fahrradstraße (ohne Ausnahmen-Schild).
streckenkundler (2022-07-29 20:07:18+00:00): Hei,
ja, beim Schild "Fahrradstraße", also http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=244.1 muß man sich zwingend von highway=path lösen. Das ist immer höherwertiger! Das sagt aus, daß sich jeglicher, dem Fahrrad gegenüber höherwertiger Verkehr dem Fahrradverkehr unterzuordnen hat. Das heißt wiederum daß auch zu mindestens im Anliegerverkehr auch z.B. das Auto zugelassen ist. Ja und das schließt wiederum highway=path aus...

"Fahrradstraße" ist also ein Art "gemixte" Straßenklasse: wenn keine weitere Zusatzbeschilderung: direkter PKW-(und höherwertiger) Anliegerverkehr ja, alles andere nein. Radfahrer haben aber trotzdem immer den Vorrang... Also wenn Opa mit Enkel nebeneinander da lang fahren und schön trödelnd, weil sie die Natur genießen, Opa dem Enkel die Landschaft erklärt und Trucker Torsten, der zu der am eben jenen Weg liegenden Hausnummer 21 Möbel bringen will, dann muß eben Trucker Torsten mit seinem LKWatsch den beiden hinterhertrotteln, wenn die beiden keine Lust haben Platz zu machen.

Sven
Lejun (2022-07-26 04:56:30+00:00): Salut et merci pour ta contribution – la première ça se fête ! Si ça t’ennuie pas est-ce que tu pourrais expliquer ce que tu as voulu faire ? J’ai l’impression que tu as utilisé la clé name pour indiquer plusieurs choses, il y a une ferme à proximité ? Pourquoi « Cacao » ? Qu’est ce que « CHA By » ?
DanGuyane (2022-07-26 22:15:21+00:00): Bonjour.

En fait je ne voulais ajouter qu'un favori perso, pas un repère "viewpoint" destiné à l'ensemble de la communauté.

Pour vous répondre :
Cacao est un village Mhong situé dans la commune de Roura. M. CHA By est un agriculteur. Sa ferme "Le jardin du ciel" est bien nommée car s'y trouve le point culminant de la région. Ce lieu privé n'est pas ouvert au public.

Bien cordialement. 
Daniel ATTIA
Lejun (2022-07-27 06:23:38+00:00): On peut considérer ça comme une erreur de manipulation et supprimer le point dans ce cas ?
emersonveenstra (2022-07-25 20:02:38+00:00): Hi,

Please don't name driveways "Driveway", it's redundant. Also, you probably want to make it a driveway, not a living street
lyctkel (2023-12-03 10:45:34+00:00): Hi dementader,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9910312602 you wrote recycling:glass_bottles=street_lamp
This looks like a copy/paste error. Did you mean recycling:glass_bottles=yes.
Regards lyctkel
clementader (2023-12-03 11:27:25+00:00): You are right !
Its a mismatche.
Thank you.
Jean-Marie
lyctkel (2023-12-03 12:06:47+00:00): Hi Jean Marie,
Thank you very much for the fix.
Regards
lyctkel
ElliottPlack (2022-09-01 02:16:23+00:00): Interesting, I see you requested review but regrettably, no one has responded yet. I think this looks good (and I've wondered how to add this sort of thing). How do you like how this worked?
zyphlar (2022-09-01 23:21:49+00:00): Hiya! It was an interesting concept but ultimately I think data consumers aren't really ready for it: even if it were super relevant (like if a certain floor of a parking garage were critical information, such as when each floor is connected to different businesses in a mall or you need to be on a certain floor in order to drive to another area) your GPS app will likely be unable to tell how high up you are, and likely be unable to distinguish which loop you're on, and have poor satellite reception, so simply tagging either the ground or topmost level is probably the best way to go for the near future.

Main exception I can imagine to that would be situations like the mall to the West where you really want to map the fact that some parking garage ways are bridges over a larger road, but again it's hard to think of a time when a routing engine would actually send you that way intentionally and correctly.
zyphlar (2022-09-01 23:22:51+00:00): *the mall to the South, SR Plaza