piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olo81 (2021-11-07 13:01:37+00:00): tak, można dawać do operator=* informacje że to parking hotelu rycerskiego
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SK53 (2021-09-20 13:21:09+00:00): Can't believe I just linked to this & you'd checked it's still there! Think I checked 2 years ago, but didn't add a check date.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kartonage (2021-09-24 08:15:38+00:00): Hej,

it seems like you are just copying the same building object over and over. For that reason all mapped buildings do not match the actual building.
Other mappers will have a harder time mapping the buildings correctly.

Can you improve your process of mapping buildings please?

Best regards

автоматический перевод:

Эй,

кажется, что вы просто копируете один и тот же строительный объект снова и снова. По этой причине все нанесенные на карту здания не соответствуют фактическому зданию.
Другим картографам будет сложнее правильно отобразить здания.

Не могли бы вы улучшить процесс нанесения на карту зданий?

С наилучшими пожеланиями
chlenix (2021-09-20 08:44:40+00:00): это же не супермаркет?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111437732
byckel (2021-09-20 10:37:02+00:00): historic=monument is voor extreem grote objecten die gebouwd zijn ter herinnering van iets/iemand, zie ook de wiki. De erfgoed betekenis die jij zo te zien bedoelt kan je weergeven met heritage=2 (rijksmonument)
Peter Elderson (2021-09-20 12:04:44+00:00): Dank, ik heb het aangepast.
maraf24 (2021-09-20 12:55:54+00:00): [...]Generała Brygady[...]
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-20 09:48:56+00:00): Dag NHVELDH  Goed om zaken actueel te maken


Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111438001
Probeer wel de vlakken netjes te laten aansluiten. Dus de node verbinden. Nu liggen ze over elkaar heen of sluiten net niet aan.
Waar is het bosgebied gebleven langs de Galgengoorweg. Dat is nu een wit op de kaart.
Dat is toch nog gewoon bos? 

Het water zul je moeten opnemen in de mp van de heide als inner en het bos zal dus weer ingetekend 'moeten' worden.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-20 09:49:43+00:00): ... en als aanvulling. Svp niet de paden verbinden met de landuse.
eggie (2021-09-20 09:52:31+00:00): De op elkaar geplakte paden (duplicated ways) heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2021-09-20 10:08:48+00:00): De landuse overlap heb ik opgelost.. en de landuse forest bij de Galgengoorweg hersteld.
Tip Check steeds wat er met de rendering gebeurt en dan steeds weer corrigeren. Het zit vaak nog vol met kleine foutjes, Nu waarschijnlijk ook nog. dan de validator draaien en kijken of er foutmeldingen komen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-20 10:19:26+00:00): Dat weggekapte bos was oke. 
Het zal nu weer naar behoren renderen.  'k Denk dat Commodoortje ook nog wel even kijkt. Het is z'n 'achtertuin'.
NHVELDH (2021-09-21 09:52:38+00:00): Goedemorgen Eggie, leuk om iets van je te horen. Ik ben af en toe driftig met JOSM in de weer, maar er blijft nog veel te leren. De vijver zal ik als "inner circle" toevogen aan het heidegebied; de helppagina daarover is duidelijk. Verder heb ik de omtrek van het heidegebied getekend, en de validator vond het goed. Ik zal verder zoeken naar ongerechtigheden.
eggie (2021-09-21 10:31:17+00:00): Oke .. gewoon doorzetten en vooral plezier in mappen houden.
Mvg
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
渤海西岸 (2021-09-20 09:35:24+00:00): 是听不懂中国话吗？
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-29 05:41:19+00:00): It seems like that local mapper have argue with you, why not try to communite with he/she? 

------
Best wishes
快乐的老鼠宝宝
Belonging to OSMChina DT
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111438060
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-09-20 12:49:24+00:00): Przydatne jest umieszczanie starej nazwy w old_name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_5359 (2021-09-21 07:40:21+00:00): Hello! Please notice the stadard value 24/7 for the key opening_hours if a object is always open.
BBHmap (2021-09-27 02:00:30+00:00): سلام. متاسفانه همیشه موجب مشگل برای خودم و شما می‌شود این پایین بودن سیکنال اینترنت من که همیشه مرا با اختلاف مکان نشان می‌دهد، لطفا مساعدت کنید و برای سنجش آنچه را بگویید ارائه خواهم کرد. سپاسگزارم
iran map 28 (2021-09-27 03:07:36+00:00): سلام میشه بیشتر توضیح دهید
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
emergency99 (2021-09-20 09:54:34+00:00): In dem Fall könnte man vlt eine site relation verwenden.
Luzandro (2021-09-21 16:46:46+00:00): Ich habe die Relation von building=yes auf ruins angeglichen bzw. die building-tags bei den Einzelteilen dann gleich ganz entfernt. Außerdem habe ich es wieder auf Multipolygon zurück geändert. Outer gibt es durchaus, nämlich 2 getrennte:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Two_disjunct_outer_rings

Im Wiki zu site wird darauf hingewiesen, dass site nicht verwendet werden sollte, wenn das Objekt nur durch Flächen und ein Multipolygon beschrieben werden kann

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
kuhni74 (2021-09-22 09:11:19+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Die Wikis hab ich gelesen, war aber nicht ganz sicher (nicht zuletzt, weil iD zunächst beim Versuch zwei ways in ein multipolygon zu integrieren, ohne "inner" und "outer" anzugeben, eine Fehlermeldung auswarf), deshalb hab ich ja auch um Check von Profis gebeten :-) Auf die Idee, zwei outer polygons zu definieren, bin ich natürlich nicht gekommen. Danke jedenfalls!
MxxCon (2021-09-20 21:45:33+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description this field must never be used for advertisement or otherwise promotional messages. It is considered spamming.
Jordi MF (2021-09-21 23:04:17+00:00): Hola Josepvc,
¿Por qué dices que el nombre original de esta senda es 'Senda las Molas'? El ICV no dice eso y no encontramos bibliografia al respecto. Estás añadiendo nombres sin citar la fuente de conocimiento y, además, estás eliminando nombres de la etiqueta 'name' sin mantenerlos en ninguna otra.

No respondes a esta misma petición que te hemos hecho en otro chamgeset, por lo que deberemos revertir estos cambios.

La comunidad de colaboradores de OSM está a tu disposición para cualquier duda. 
Saludos,
Jordi
woodpeck (2021-09-20 09:13:16+00:00): Herman, the changeset that you have reverted had the following changeset comment: "This area, together with the Doklam plateau, are under investigation by the DWG. Please, do not change them in the meantime." -- Have you seen that comment and ignored it deliberately, or have you accidentally overlooked that comment?
Herman Lee (2021-09-20 09:20:33+00:00): Have you used the proper tags? Have you seen my comment???
NM$L (2021-09-20 09:24:23+00:00): So what's the results of it? Or how much have the investigation taken?
Herman Lee (2021-09-20 09:31:39+00:00): 原来是贵人看不懂英文啊，那就用中文说一下啊，因由阁下在110858577修改集中添加了一些天马行空的标签，谓之“fixme=What's this”，拉康镇与拉郊乡之释义为拉康镇与拉郊乡，此乃义如其名也，况子将已有之乡镇关系破坏，实乃居心叵测也。吾以为无须复言。
user_11435438 (2021-09-20 10:09:28+00:00): woodpeck, why are you tagging 'fixme=What's this?'? It is an admin boundary, is it hard for you to understand? Or do you think it does not exist?
user_11435438 (2021-09-20 10:10:54+00:00): Or do you want to deny the existence of these things but have not found any basis?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-20 14:30:13+00:00): So fixme=What's this is a proper way to investigate a area?

edvac had do a lot of un-investigated change and ignore other user's evidence, for this thing we will request another DWG member to do this
Maria Bombardil (2021-09-20 15:28:28+00:00): Have any DWG investigated this area? If not, please do not judge the geographic information by the US official data. It may cause potential incorrect edition.
edvac (2021-09-21 09:11:48+00:00): Dear all:

All these late changes to the Bhutan-China border are under investigation by the **whole** DWG. Please, do not make any changes to them in the meantime.
Herman Lee (2022-01-03 04:58:28+00:00): DWG will never give us a response?
Herman Lee (2022-01-03 04:59:05+00:00): It has been in 2022.
FreedSky (2022-03-25 15:26:38+00:00): It has been in 2077. XD
Herman Lee (2026-06-15 13:28:00+00:00): It's in 2026
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-09 00:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115928159 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Warin61 (2021-09-21 07:21:45+00:00): This has substantially moved the suburban boundary for Badgerys Creek and Luddenham.

What is your source for doing that? 

-----------------------
I can see that the airport uses nodes from various other things .. and this may be why the changes were made .. I think a reversion is in order and the way for the airport changed to a relation so that where it uses other things it is apparent to anyone who wants to modify it that they are not oly changing the airport but also the other thing.
Warin61 (2021-09-22 07:14:34+00:00): Reverted. 

New Way: Western Sydney International (Nancy Bird Walton) Airport (985743235) ... shares no nodes with anything else. That is sourced from Maxar Imagery. I anticipate that the true airport area may be larger.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Futur3r (2021-09-20 12:40:45+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai mis à jour conformément à Route 500.
Et je pense que le type de route à aussi à voir par rapport au niveau de trafic, pas seulement au niveau de desserte alentour.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111439948
Marc Mongenet (2021-09-21 17:48:14+00:00): Bonjour

Route 500 est intéressant, mais il ne faut pas perdre de vue que le but d'OSM est de mapper le terrain, pas des documents. Ainsi au rond-point de Doussard on a un panneau D21b blanc "Tailloires" pour la D909a, et les panneaux bleu "A41" et vert "Annecy" pour la D1508. Le dimensionnement des routes est aussi différent: le côté Talloires n'est guère prévu pour les poids lourds, etc. Les données de trafic penchent aussi naturellement pour la D1508 (https://www.haute-savoie.gouv.fr/Politiques-publiques/Votre-departement/Deplacements/Circulation-routiere/Carte-interactive-du-trafic). Mais ce qui m'a fait vraiment penché, comme j'ai indiqué en commentaire, c'est que je voulais montrer aux gens consultant la carte pour un long trajet qu'il y avait clairement des route plus adaptées et prévues pour le trafic lourd et/ou longue distance: D1508 et voie des Aravis. Les traversées de Talloires, Menthon, Veyrier, ne sont guère prévues ni adaptées à ce trafic.
Futur3r (2021-09-21 18:00:23+00:00): Ok, je suis d'accord
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Jrachi (2022-09-10 15:42:36+00:00): Il nome di un sentiero non è il ref del percorso di cui è parte.

Correggo io ma tu fai attenzione in futuro
andyblueg (2021-12-27 18:12:57+00:00): Hallo Kiekin,
ich denke, die gegenwaertige Darstellung der Kreuzung ist irre fuehrend. 

1. Kommt man z.B. auf der K10 aus Guest und moechte geradeaus in den Kastanienweg fahren, so muss man nun laut Karte rechts abbiegen.

2. Das gleiche Problem, wenn man vom Kastanienweg 37 kommt und geradeaus auf die K10 in Richtung Greifswald fahren moechte. Auch hier muss man rechts auf die K10 abbiegen. 

Gemasse Verkehrsfuehrung und Ausschilderung muss aber in beiden Faellen geradeaus gefahren werden. Ich schlage daher vor, dass die Kreuzung wieder auf ein einfaches Kreuz vereinfacht wird. 


Danke,  Andreas
Carto'Cité (2022-12-15 10:42:14+00:00): Bonjour 
A priori la transformation de cette route en une piste cyclable était une erreur 😉
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540391997
Un contributeur a corrigé. La thématique aménagement cyclable est un peu compliqué, n’hésitez pas à échanger avec la communauté si vous souhaitez tenter à nouveau de contribuer 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Cartographer10 (2021-09-20 15:47:38+00:00): Hey,

Deze parkeerplaats [1] lijkt geen lane maar parking=street_side. parking=lane is voor parkeren op de straat ( en dan heeft parking:lane=* de voorkeur). Misschien dat je er nog even naar kunt kijken.

Mvg,
Vincent

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984745371
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=street_side
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skyper (2021-09-22 23:04:27+00:00): Hallo Diana
Warum hast Du denn den Kreisverkehr aufgeteilt? Für Abbiegebeschränkungen ist das doch nicht nötig!
Scheint wohl bei Mapbox Angestellten öfter vorzukommen ( z.B. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111320152). Könnt Ihr das intern bitte mal besprechen? Danke.

Das iD anscheinend Abbiegerelation löscht und neu anlegt, ist wohl auch ein Problem.

Auch hier wurden alle Routenrelationen beschädigt, also bitte seid vorsichtig beim Aufteilen, insbesondere mit iD, und achtet auf die Reihenfolge der Routenrelationsmitglieder.

Habe es repariert bevor, wie mit CS 111320152, einfach nur zurückgesetzt wird.

Könnt Ihr mir bitte die Ergebnisse Eurer Analysen mitteilen. Danke.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
DianaDemchuk (2021-09-23 07:07:50+00:00): Hello skyper!
We discussed this topic within the team. The error is related to the work of the OSM ID and how it splits the weights when mapping restrictions. We will be more careful with the roads that have relations. Thank you for your attention to our work!
skyper (2021-09-23 11:07:25+00:00): Hi Diana
Danke für die Antwort.
Habt Ihr die beiden Problem denn iD gemeldet (issue)?
1. Unnötiges Aufteilen
2. Beim Verändern einer Restriction-Relationen wird die existierende gelöscht und eine neue Relation erstellt, anstatt die existierende zu verändern.
Im Zweifel ist vielleicht auch eine bessere Editor-Software wie JOSM die Lösung.
Ciao skyper
DianaDemchuk (2021-09-23 11:19:50+00:00): We mainly discussed the problems associated with your first point. However, the team will re-introduce the topic on the correct mapping of such places. Thank you!
eggie (2021-09-20 11:18:54+00:00): Tag Wallenstein 
Willkommen auf OSM..

Vielleicht dauert die Absperrung niet lange?
Deswegen 'taggen' wir nicht gleich access=no.
Das kann auch mit conditional tagging.
Zb. access:conditional=no @ (2021 sep 20-2021 dec 1) 

Sonst bleibt er für 'immer' auf access=no 
Wissen Sie veilleicht mehr Bescheid darüber?
Es gibt nämlich auch ein Knotenpunkt Wanderroute hier. 

tschüss,
eggie
Wallenstein55 (2021-09-21 14:33:24+00:00): Hallo,
Die Sperrung ist meiner Ansicht nach dauerhaft.
Der Weg soll wohl für immer für den Tourismus- Verkehr verschwinden.
Gruß Wallenstein
eggie (2021-09-21 15:59:00+00:00): Oke.... Schade.. aber vielleicht notwendig

Vielen Dank...
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.