piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-04-25 22:16:48+00:00): رائع وتعديل صحيح و واقعي
ali 1375 (2022-04-30 12:19:03+00:00): this is Persian Gulf. please study some history and geography first and then come here
LockOnGuy (2022-04-30 12:28:56+00:00): Thank you @Abdullah Abdulrhman
LockOnGuy (2022-04-30 12:29:49+00:00): Hi @adsfzxcv, and welcome to OSM!  
Here in OSM we prefer to use the local language to call features in the map.  
You can learn more here:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map  
Best Regards.
ali 1375 (2022-04-30 13:46:16+00:00): hi @LockOnGuy, i think you are from iraq. in iraq you can use every local name that you want for features, but when you want to call a foreign feature, you should either call it by its international name or its local name. the international name of this body of water is "Persian Gulf" and its local name is the name that majority of its inhabitant use. Iran has more border and population than any other Persian Gulf countries, so a local name should be an Iranian name like "Khalij-e Fars".
best wishes for you
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 16:07:25+00:00): See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kag and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kah - this changset added some island controlled by Iran to also be part of the UAE's admin_level=2 area.  
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123563171 .
LockOnGuy (2022-07-16 16:15:42+00:00): Hello, SomeoneElse,          
You mean, Crescent Moon Island Dubai?      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014358547       
Since when Crescent Moon Island Dubai controlled by Iran?        
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 16:50:20+00:00): > You mean, Crescent Moon Island Dubai? 
No, I asked about islands "controlled by Iran", and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123563171 linked to the overlapping relations.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-04-25 22:17:43+00:00): شكراً لك
gusfak (2022-06-05 14:38:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
martianfreeloader (2022-04-26 20:40:11+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding the new roundabout. Just FYI you broke the bus relations of line 27 by doing so (you forgot to add them to the roundabout). I'll fix that, this is just to give you a heads up for future similar cases.
Mark Martinec (2022-04-26 22:01:56+00:00): Thanks for fixing! I was aware to be leaving job half-done, hoping for someone to pick it up :)  Also the cycleway/footway to the East is now broken. The roundabout is actually a turbo-roundabout (spiraling roads outwards), so this needs further work. Likewise all the roundabouts to the West on Letališka street.
martianfreeloader (2022-04-27 20:06:49+00:00): Yep, let's hope for the 2021 orthophoto to go online soon!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-10 19:54:29+00:00): Šiaip visai gal ir nieko, tikrai ne itin išvaizdi sankryža realybėje. Nuėmus 1054906913 ir 1054906911 (kad nebūtų kelių kur nėra fizinio atskyrimo, kaip kad sutarta žymėti Lietuvoje) gautųsi visai nieko. Tik kitą kartą patikrinkit kaip sužymėjot, nes jau dvi savaitės kaip pusė Žeimenos g. tapus vienpuse :D
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-10 19:55:08+00:00): Su lanes irgi, nes tie vienpusiai segmentai dažnai turi tik pusę normalaus kelio eilių
PovilasDew (2022-05-10 20:06:07+00:00): Ok, ačiū už pastabas.

Galvoju, viskas ok, tik norėtųsi, kad atskiras posūkis iš Lukšio į Žeimenos g. liktų, nes ten asfalte yra trikampis pažymėtas.  Šiaip ta sankryža tragedija eismo organizavimo prasme. Ne visada asfalto perteklius kažką išsprendžia.
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-11 06:04:20+00:00): Taip, kaip ši sankryža atrodo dabar, yra stebuklas, lyginant kaip ji atrodė prieš metus, kai iš visur buvo galima sukti visom kryptimis. Dėl to ir atrodė ji taip baisiai žemėlapyje... 
Dėl trikampių - labai daug sankryžų juos turi, kad ir Lukšio bei Žukausko šviesoforinė - bet tai neleidžia nei praleisti kažkokio apribojimo (kaip pvz. maximos ir draugystės senukų šviesofore galima sukti į dešinę nelaukiant šviesoforo), nei yra kažkoks fizinis barjeras (kaip kad iš Žeimenos rytų į Lukšio g., kur atskirta stulpeliais)...
PovilasDew (2022-05-11 11:11:11+00:00): Supratau, tiesiog skirtingai traktavau nereguliuojamas ir reguliuojamas sankryžas. Reguliuojamoje dešinys posūkis galvoje automatiškai susijungia su likusia sankryža, o nereguliuojamoje viskas "kas sau", nes niekas nereguliuoja išskyrus pirmumo ir posūkių ženklus :)
PovilasDew (2022-05-11 11:12:20+00:00): Aišku, jei kuoliukais ar bordiūrais atskirtas dešininis posūkis, tai visais atvejais (tiek šviesofor., tiek nešviesofor.) atskiriam ir fiziškai.
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-11 11:32:41+00:00): Realiai aš tai galvoju šitaip (jei nėra fizinio barjero): ar pridėjus papildomą kelią, pasikeistų maršrutizavimas? Šiuo atveju ne. O jeigu posūkis į dešinę būtų padarytas laisvai, o tiesiai/į kairę yra stop ženklas? Tada atskiras kelias būtų naudingas net ir esant paprastam baltam trikampiui, tik reikėtų tinkamai pažymėti stop ženklą.
Aišku mes darom žemėlapį ne kažkokiam konkrečiam maršrutizatoriui (pvz. graphhopper ties kiekvienu linijų sujungimu bando apsisukti, bet gi nepridėliosim kiekvienam sujungime kad „negalima“), bet šiek tiek atsižvelgti į populiariausius OSM panaudojimus tikrai galima.
eggie (2022-04-26 08:08:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  I disconnected the Houthavengracht from the multipolygon Milieuzone Amsterdam brom- en snorfietsen.
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120186132

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 23:14:26+00:00): Hola Jhoselyn6, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no ha ingresado ningún texto. Por favor agregue un texto de tal modo que el resto de la comunidad pueda entender en que han consistido los cambios. Puede encontrar mayor información en la sección de buenos comentarios de conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Bluebasaur (2022-04-30 15:33:24+00:00): Hey just letting you know that the points in Kittery at least that you added were duplicative. Make sure when you're adding a location that it includes basic information like the address if possible, and double check that it doesn't already have a point or area with those details. I removed them in changeset 120389813.
Tarmengau (2022-05-12 02:53:02+00:00): I'm not sure where you saw them as duplicates. I checked the map, didn't see them, and then checked again once I select "add a place" since all previously placed locations appear at that time. Only after seeing nothing there do I add to the map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
impiaaa (2022-04-26 21:02:25+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset messages. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Like, what did you add, and where? Additionally, try to save your changes in one local area before moving on to another one.
supercrazycoder10000 (2022-06-13 16:41:21+00:00): Sure thanks for the tip I will make sure to follow community guidelines in the future by adding a more descriptive description in the future
VlIvYur (2024-09-26 06:13:58+00:00): Hello
All houses in this changeset have addr:housenumber=pas de numéro. Are they really don't have housenumbers or you just couldn't find plates with numbers?
Frans S (2022-05-02 14:22:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Please use the correct Imagery: Maxar Premium. You mapped from an outdated Bing Imagery
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120187693
ovruni (2022-04-26 00:34:31+00:00): Hola, los objetos que tienebuilding:levels deben de tener también una etiqueta building.
Saludos
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 04:39:02+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Diese Häuser wurden in Reihenhausblöcke umgetaggt. Auf dem Luftbild erkenne ich Mehrfamilienhäuser. Kann es sein, dass Du Dich hier geirrt hast?

Melde Dich am besten direkt hier im Changeset, damit wir gemeinsam die Daten verbessern können. Danke!
user_5359 (2022-04-27 04:33:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054944472 (only for example). You forgot to add any highway key for your gpx tracks.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-27 00:07:21+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OSM.

Unfortunately, none of the changes you have made here make much sense.

You may need to run through the iD editor tutorial or consult the OSM wiki to gain a better understanding of how to map before making any further changes here.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-27 00:12:16+00:00): For reference:

-You changed more than one long section of suburban sidewalk into a bridge.

- You added a restaurant in the middle of a road.

-You changed a huge section of a locality boundary into a subway, split it and then added a bridge in the middle.

-You added an impossibly fast speed limit to a school parking lot.

-You created a pedestrian crosswalk at the entrance to a school.
Supaplex (2022-04-26 03:01:15+00:00): Hi 

台灣台鐵1067軌道軌距一般都不歸為窄軌吧
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120188173
Glassman (2022-04-28 22:51:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120188296
Glassman (2022-04-28 22:52:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. - thanks for adding tags to the Chase bank you did in your first edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120188344
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-04 07:49:32+00:00): هذه خريطة عامة وليست لحفظ مواقعك الخاصة، نرجوا منكم عدم رفعها للخريطة العامة
Frans S (2022-05-21 10:33:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please use the prescribed imagery: Maxar Premium. You mapped from an outdated Bing Imagery.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120189026
felipeeugenio (2022-05-03 12:49:52+00:00): Hola Gustavo. No soy un experto en mapeo de este tipo de cosas, pero me da la impresión de que mapeaste con una foto de verano, cuando el rio está bajo. Esos bancos de arena son temporales y entiendo no debieran mapearse. El tag tidalflat que usaste rio adentro me da la idea de que es para otra cosa viendo la wiki.
quedo atento. saludos
GustavoE (2022-05-03 21:43:23+00:00): Hola Felipe, gracias por hacerme notar la diferencia entre etiquetas adecuadas para usar en esta área del río.
Zalitoar (2022-10-13 07:05:47+00:00): Hola Areanfg, vi que eliminaste relaciones para convertirlas a polígonos. Si bien cualquiera de las formas son correctas, no es necesario eliminar una relación de un edificio o cualquier otra cosa para pasarlo a un polígono. Por otra parte, las relaciones reutilizan lados o líneas para más de un área en cambio los polígonos necesitan duplicarlas si comparten lados. Siempre es recomendado consultar antes de eliminar el trabajo de otros colaboradores. Saludos
Areanfg (2022-10-13 16:46:30+00:00): Bueno después de investigar un rato, entiendo que llamas "relacion" a un multipoligono, que es un tipo de relacion, no es un area, de las que te ofrece el editor web, que se crea solo al combinar distintas areas que se superponen. entiendo bien? No se puede deshacer mi edición? Quise ver como estaba antes, pero el historial de cambio no muestra como estaba hecho.
Zalitoar (2022-10-17 21:18:05+00:00): Las relaciones no son multipolígonos solamente, pueden conformarse por varios elementos de distinto tipo de geometrías. Es algo complejo de explicar en estos comentarios porque se usan para varias cosas. El editor web iD permite trabajar con relaciones pero de forma muy básica, y en el mismo es difícil "ver" una relación completa, para ello es recomendable el editor JOSM.
Estuve revisando los demás edificios de alrededor y creo que no se eliminó nada existente, sumaste edificios pero como polígonos simples. No hace falta revertir ningún cambio, menos si lo que está mapeado refleja bien lo que existe en el lugar.
Zalitoar (2022-10-17 21:21:14+00:00): Un tema aparte son los nombres, el consenso local indica que no se usan abreviaturas siendo por ejemplo "Escuela de Educación Secundaria Técnica 2". "Lomas de Zamora" no forma parte del nombre de dicha escuela por lo que no hace falta agregarlo.
En esta wiki se documento el consenso de la comunidad argentina sobre mapeo de instituciones educativas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Educaci%C3%B3n
Cualquier consulta avisame!
Stahlmann (2022-06-06 14:12:32+00:00): Zurückgesetzt

Begründung: Für private/gewerbliche Informationen deren Nutzen für reguläre Nutzer der OSM nicht ersichtlich oder falsch erscheinen bitte Projekte wie uMap nutzen.
nevw (2022-04-26 03:27:00+00:00): Hi
it is normal practice to continue footways across the roadways so that pedestrian routing can work. Should I revert your changes or are you able to fix?
Inspector05 (2022-04-26 04:41:45+00:00): Hi nevw,
I've reverted the changes based on your feedback.
nevw (2022-04-26 05:10:00+00:00): You could tag such crossings as unmarked if you feel uncomfortable with the safety of such crossings.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Inspector05 (2022-04-26 05:24:04+00:00): That's good to know. Thanks for the help nevw.
user_7130456 (2022-05-18 13:06:33+00:00): 仓储用地请使用工业区，再选择warehouse类型，不要直接选择仓库，那个是建筑物
Stahlmann (2022-06-06 14:12:24+00:00): Zurückgesetzt

Begründung: Für private/gewerbliche Informationen deren Nutzen für reguläre Nutzer der OSM nicht ersichtlich oder falsch erscheinen bitte Projekte wie uMap nutzen.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-26 08:58:54+00:00): 1. It's not "excessive" if it exists. They are simply defined as high points and low points. It's up to applications and renderers to show them with priorities. 
2. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=ridge#Examples eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Druim-Eileasaig-z14-opencyclemap.png and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Walker-Ridge-z14-from-Opencyclemap.png --- They don't have to be very sharp and exposed on top, or like a `=arete`.
Stahlmann (2022-06-06 14:12:53+00:00): Zurückgesetzt

Begründung: Für private/gewerbliche Informationen deren Nutzen für reguläre Nutzer der OSM nicht ersichtlich oder falsch erscheinen bitte Projekte wie uMap nutzen.
wireguy (2022-04-27 12:39:17+00:00): hi IK, can you review your change?
Barrio Viejo relation 7058543, and relation 11859917 are now broken.

and since your are cleaning up things on things, check out these overlaps:
way 872829749
way 872829746
way 872829747

way 872829751
way 872829752
way 872829753
MxxCon (2022-04-26 06:09:33+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what did you edit here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120190053
azakh-world (2022-04-26 13:07:09+00:00): Let me elaborate. A stop_position that is close to F routes but belonging to another line at an interchange was added to the routes. Reverted.

Best regards
Glassman (2022-04-28 23:02:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks okay except for the description. I added the business address and website to OSM. You can add other information like contact phone, fax, email and business hours.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120190607
Frans S (2022-05-13 13:14:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Important. Use the Maxar P imagery.
You are mapping from the Bing Imagery.
Non-existing buildings mapped. Wrong positioned.  Destroyed buildings not removed.
Please read the instructions.
I invalidate this task. Sorry
These notes are also valid for your other changesets.
Best regards and keep mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120191512
mavl (2022-05-20 16:00:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:00:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:00:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ملاك ساقط (2022-05-06 20:47:35+00:00): Why have you removed the Wikidata tag?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-18 15:28:38+00:00): Hej,
access=yes  på trappen er ikke korrekt.
Det tillader cyklister, biler, snescootere, hesteryttere osv.
kortgodt (2022-06-18 15:32:52+00:00): tak, modtaget. Det var en svipser.
user_5359 (2022-04-26 18:32:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-26 10:39:09+00:00): Editors and PDOK have 7.5cm imagery available since last year. You can also use Esri's 'enhanced' imagery (essentially the same imagery with some filters applied) which should be available in most places, though on some zoom levels may show older imagery (so be careful).

cc: vladaboitsik; Mapbox
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/366#issuecomment-1109635771
kolasau (2022-04-26 10:55:33+00:00): Hello, thank you, will keep it in mind.
voschix (2025-08-24 16:30:23+00:00): What is the source of this data?
Tagging is not correct: should be highway=proposed + proposed=trunk/motorway/...
Ropino (2022-04-29 08:41:14+00:00): Hallo Wanderwilly,
wenn du Addressen erfasst, achte bitte auf vollständige Angaben (incl. Straße und Hausnummer).
Mit der Gießkanne an alle Gebäude (auch jede Hundehütte) addr:country,city,postcode,suburb zu verteilen, bringt keinen wirklichen Mehrwert.
VG