piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
austinsnow (2026-05-21 21:36:54+00:00): When I put these in, I looked up the laws in Washington and Seattle, and they seemed a bit vague on the yielding rules within these traffic-calming circles. I thought roundabout fit at the time.

But now, looking back and reviewing WSDOT and Seattle sources, I suspect you are right - they are treated as uncontrolled intersections in determining yield rules, as opposed to typical roundabout "yield to whoever is in the intersection" rules. So it would make sense to change these from roundabout to circular junctions.

That said, there are 1000+ of these neighborhood circles, so it might be a daunting task to find and fix all of these.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 18:53:00+00:00): anche quì, il nome popolare va separato dal tag name e messo nel tag "loc_name"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112797952
literan (2021-10-22 16:51:21+00:00): ну и зачем вы теги станции со станции метро Курская снесли?
AlChe (2021-11-12 09:37:25+00:00): А зачем у метро(!) "Курская" стоял тег "express:user"=>"2000001" ?
literan (2021-11-12 13:08:15+00:00): понятия не имею, я не знаю, что это за тег. Спросите того, кто добавил.

Но разве это повод сносить основной тег станции?
AlChe (2021-11-15 10:45:10+00:00): Если вы понятия не имеете, то странно тогда иметь претензии :)

Тег express:user - это код станции в системе продажи ж.д.-билетов Экспресс-3. Очевидно, его не должно быть у станции метро.
literan (2021-11-15 11:55:39+00:00): вы снесли со станции метро тег станции railway=station. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5202107570/history

Меня только это интересует, а не неясные мне коды, которые не задокументированы в вики.

Если вы понятия не имеете, что вы делаете, раз сносите основной тег объекта (по сути, удаляете из базы станцию метро), то странно учить других. 

с моей стороны разговор завершен
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 17:01:54+00:00): Почитайте

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Ukraine
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112798062
maraf24 (2021-10-21 18:00:26+00:00): Problem z adresem:
Tu był i powinien być: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200472128/history
a wywędrował tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1174578025
SP6ZOLW-7 (2021-10-21 18:08:56+00:00): przepraszam mis clic 
błąd nowicjusza mogę wziąść hulajnogę i to potwierdzić organoleptycznie
eggie (2021-10-21 17:31:07+00:00): Beste Dave.. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot en dus lastig te checken.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.

Wat bedoel je met Update?
Probeer svp concreet te beschrijven wat je hebt gedaan. 
MVG
eggie
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 18:57:04+00:00): anche quì non fidarti nelle foto aree BING. Sono pessime. Prova ad impratichirti utilizzando il "JOSM" che permette l'utilizzo delle TRUE-ORTOFOTO RAFVG anno 2020. Nome storico, se diverso dal nome attuale, da inserire nel tag old_name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112798642
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:56:47+00:00): Советую остановиться вносить правки на карту и почитать сначала вики. А то, похоже, вы не понимаете, что делаете.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112798669
pesec (2021-10-22 06:57:55+00:00): Данным пакетом правок вы нарушили движение по парковочным проездам, сдвинули проезды на существующие дома, поставили точки магазинов на проезд, добавили забор, пересекающий проезд, чем нарушили общую связность данных карты.
Ваш пакет правок будет отменен.
Изучите правила, прежде чем приступать к правкам.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:54:52+00:00): Откуда вы взяли геометрию тропы? Похоже, что вообще нарисовано от балды. В точках пересечения должен быть узел, если hw расположен на одном уровне. Не следует цеплять hw к контурам других объектов без необходимости.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112798849
thevalidator (2021-12-29 01:13:20+00:00): Obrigado pela adição!!
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:49:27+00:00): Не клейте точки POI к контурам зданий. Для здания прямоугольной формы достаточно 4 угла. Зачем лишний узел на северном фасаде? После удаления всего лишнего нажмите Q, чтобы выровнять углы.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112799051
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 19:01:19+00:00): anche quì non va bene indicare tutto nel campo name. va differenziato il nome ufficiale dai nomi popolare utilizzando campi TAG separati. Non fidarti delle foto di BING, presentano troppi errori intrinsechi per poterle utilizzare per affinare il posizionamento di edifici.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112799078
SekeRob (2021-10-21 19:03:46+00:00): Funny, the CAR OSRM continues to route incorrectly with the no u turn added, G > P, but CAR Graphhopper does it correct in both directions, via the shortcut. The bike option still tries to let you climb via the Scaletta di Ferro, a neck breaking enterprise albeit I've seen MTB come down the stairs at the fontanella in full protective gear. My cycle program in tourbike mode happily sends me up the stairs, no indicator that a section has to be done on foot, so every time I pass the point going to Balzolo they get a full thumbs down. Supposedly the program learns from recorded trips but not on this one.

cheers.
SekeRob (2021-10-21 19:11:46+00:00): PS The turn restriction simulator does show it correctly in both directions with or without the U turn restriction. A red arrow for a sharp corner in both directions, blue for straight i.e the only straight are correctly mapped. Not impossible the CAR OSRM has a bug.
SekeRob (2021-11-17 12:46:27+00:00): hi,

Just to let you know, I've added turn lanes tags to the intersection in Bocca di Valle. OSM Routing simulator from Colle Barone to PennaP and vice versa is working correctly now. I'm in a fix frenzy momentarily with a diagnostic tool I've seen many times, OSM Inspector, but did not see through it. Many pennies dropped.

cheers
pesec (2021-10-22 06:59:45+00:00): Данным пакетом правок вы нанесли лавочку на жилое здание, дополнили парковую зону в виде точки внутри существующего полигона парка отдыха, добавили беговые дорожки в виде отдельных точек, чем нарушили связность карты.
Ваш пакет правок будет отменен.
Изучите правила, прежде чем приступать к правкам.
tuttiton (2021-10-23 15:27:02+00:00): Please remove fictional information from the map
Dodko (2021-10-22 17:27:51+00:00): V značkye opening_hours chýba bodkočiarka na oddelenie jednotlivých dní.
Pomôcka na tvorbu otváracieho času je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Do značky note sa píše poznámka pre maperov https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Key:note?uselang=sk
váš text patrí skôr do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Adresa je už uložená na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61389002 preto sa znovu nevypĺňa na bode banky. Navigácie si to načítajú z budovy.
Rainero (2021-11-03 19:21:27+00:00): Hallo Eva,
gerade bin ich darüber gestolpert, dass bei diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29709351 der Straßenname fehlt. Du hast da ja kürzlich die Adressen erfaßt; der Weg heißt also Ährenweg? Der Weg wurde vor 10 Jahren das letzte Mal bearbeitet. Da steht noch surface=unpaved. Vom Luftbild her kann ich's nicht richtig einschätzen, daher habe ich mich auf eine kleine Geometriekorrektur beschränkt. Vielleicht kannst du name und ggf. surface ergänzen?  

Übrigens Gratulation zum 8. Platz bei den erfaßten Hausnummern im Oktober:
https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/theoretische_auswertung_anzeigen

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
EvaUnterwegs (2021-11-07 14:29:06+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
danke für den Hinweis. Ja, der Weg heißt Ährenweg. Es gibt ein Schild an der Abzweigung von der Freisinger Landstraße. Ich habe den Namen und die Oberfläche gerade ergänzt.

Dankeschön :)

Viele Grüße,
Eva
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:42:56+00:00): amenity=townhall не отменяет того факта, что это здание. Зря убрали тег. Точка внутри контура с таким же тегом не требуется. У вас получилось дублирование. Уберите точку.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112800108
jmilot (2021-10-22 18:42:40+00:00): Hi,

The cycle path you added is already present as a shared_lane on Rue Tasse : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165096626#map=17/45.52018/-73.68434

Did this recently change and become a fully, segregated cycle path? If so, I'd invite you to also remove the information from Rue Tasse. Otherwise, if it was possible to avoid duplicating information, it'd be appreciated.
Glassman (2021-10-24 20:50:26+00:00): #TIP: The building outline should just cover the roof. Can up redo the building? You can also create a polygon around the property and add the tag landuse=residential + name=name of apartment complex. Let me know if you need help
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112800358
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:40:50+00:00): Используйте клавишу Q для выравнивания углов зданий правильной формы.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112800435
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-12-04 03:04:39+00:00): Dear lolenzo23622

This changeset was manually reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114540954 by local mapper Paradox_ZLWC

You've done a lot of road downgrade in China and many mapper think angry about downgrade for road. You'de better communicate with them before conduct such changes.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 17:08:38+00:00): Some imported roads are not visible on the satellite imagery. Some ways have not been connected to the existing network.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112800796
LVM_import (2021-10-21 17:54:09+00:00): Due to how import process works, fixes for unconnected ways (that are visible in JOSM validator) are commited in the next changeset.

About road visibility: this is semi-automated import, so some amount of such issues is expected.

If you have more comments, we can discuss in Telegram  https://t.me/lvosm
woodpeck (2021-10-21 17:48:49+00:00): Hello, have you discussed this rather wide-ranging boundary change with anyone (especially in Greece and/or Turkey) before you executed it? If I interpret your source correctly you have more or less guessed all these boundaries from coastlines? -- Also, could you ensure that both the eastern and western boundary line around Imia/Kardak is marked disputed, currently you've only done that with the western one.
hanzlan (2021-10-21 18:11:12+00:00): Hello, I haven't discussed it as I found coherent sources from both sides mentioning the 6 nautical miles boundaries in the Aegean sea at the moment (in contrary to other seas like the Ionian or Black Sea where both countries officially use the 12 nautical miles boundaries) as the de facto state (even if disputed) should be displayed on OpenStreetMap. Sources mentioning 6 nautical miles in Greek /Turkish parts of Aegean Sea (https://www.ekathimerini.com/in-depth/analysis/234518/factbox-greece-s-territorial-waters-and-turkey/ , https://greekcitytimes.com/2020/11/04/greek-minister-12-miles-territory/ , https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/aegean.htm )
Yes, I calculated the territorial sea of 6 nautical miles (11,112 m) by downloading OSM coastlines, buffering them and finally cutting them with the median line provided by marineregions.org where Turkish/Greek territorial seas overlap. 
Thank you for the remark on the eastern boundary line of Imia/Kardak, I have added the disputed status.
ika-chan! (2021-11-01 09:22:37+00:00): I concur with hanzlan. I haven't got around to mapping the current 6NM borders due to politically-influenced severe depression, which means I have to try and avoid political stuff.
nikospag (2021-11-01 21:45:33+00:00): @hanzlan
I cant understand why did you mess with the boundaries. They are there for several years now and no one has disputed them.
At first glance it seams that you didn't messed up and they look ok, but now we have to check thoroughly if the coordinates are correct.
Please don't do this again without consulting with local comm;unites.
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 11:54:49+00:00): I'm aware that you have been doing a lot of correcting self intersecting ways recently, but there seems to be a problem around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190916705, where the contact between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557613942 and both https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557613939 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686458282 has been lost during you edit. I'm a OSM beginner (just working with iD) and cannot reconstruct what the way was like before - do you have any hint?
FvGordon (2022-07-27 15:55:17+00:00): I could see with the reverter of JOSM, how the ways were before this edit. Now they should be ok.
kuhni74 (2022-07-29 12:29:06+00:00): Perfect, thank you very much!
DressyPear4 (2021-10-21 19:19:22+00:00): Olá, essa tag seria mais adequada
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=monitoring%20station?uselang=pt-BR
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112802033
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 17:13:51+00:00): А что вы просите проверить? Закрытие аптеки? Если действительно закрыта, то правильно удалили.

Присоединяйтесь к сообществу в телеграм-чате @ruosm, где сможете задать любые вопросы по редактированию карты.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112802186
Max-Kritic (2021-11-08 17:22:01+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.76791&lat=50.28928&zoom=10&opacity=0.81
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 17:25:48+00:00): Настраивайте смещение снимков по трекам. Нажимайте клавишу Q для выравнивания углов зданий правильной формы.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112802367
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Frans S (2021-12-13 16:02:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112802545
Futur3r (2021-10-23 13:01:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Certaines de vos highway=service peuvent avoir service=driveway en plus. Cela permet un meilleur traitement par les rendus et une meilleur classification de la données.

Merci pour vos contributions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112803431
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-21 17:43:43+00:00): rimossa area abbandonata dell'ex hotel poichè non si capiscono molto bene i confini dell'area dismessa.
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 19:04:30+00:00): e il nome Bosco Badaluzza ? Mai sentito...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112803611
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-23 10:10:19+00:00): L'ho visto in un gruppo facebook locale di cose storiche. Se trovo il link te lo allego qui.
jpennycook (2021-10-21 21:15:19+00:00): Hi.

You've marked the gates around the level crossing as "motor_vehicle=permissive".  I think that "no" or "private" would be better - "permissive" would mean that motor vehicles could pass through here at any time without asking for permission.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values

Jon
HirschKauz (2021-10-23 19:05:44+00:00): Hi "Premium Kafee" und Willkommen bei OSM! 
Du hast "review request" angeklickt und ich erlaube mir daher dann ein paar Bemerkungen ;-) 
- Wenn Du keine e-Mail-Adresse hast, dann gib auch keine ein (statt eine falsche)
- TelefonNummernbitte immer im mit Ländervorwahl und ohne irgendwelche Striche (zB.: +49 1234 56789 oder sogar komplett ohne Leerzeichen: +49123456789)
- Bei Öffnungszeiten auch das "PH off" nicht vergessen, sonst hat der Laden auch an Feiertagen geöffnet.
- Beim Kopieren von der Webseite immer auf das Copyright achten (hab ich aber jetzt nicht kontrolliert)
Bei Fragen, kannst du im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page oben rechts den tag oder key eingeben zum Suchen oder zB im deutschsprachigen Forum fragen https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Weiterhin viel Spaß, HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112804066
trigpoint (2021-10-21 18:47:01+00:00): Hi
Again I am wondering what the source of these edits is.

I am puzzled what you were trying to achieve by setting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30408422 to motor_vehicle=no?
Whilst there are blue 'unsuitable for motor vehicles' signs they are legally allowed to use it and need to for access to fields and premises.

Cheers Phil
s4br1 (2021-10-21 19:23:07+00:00): Again this was information given to me by a local truck driver. I searched around and found this post about someone else who wondered how best to represent this in OSM: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6287/unsuitable-for-vehicles-text-sign

However their solution wouldn't work as this road is not really a track, I believe it just has a really worn surface that gives rise to those signs.

Would appreciate any suggestions for how better to tag this road.
trigpoint (2021-10-22 12:07:18+00:00): > I believe it just has a really worn surface that gives rise to those signs.
That is correct, and had me puzzled when you mentioned bin lorries. The poor surface only really affects small wheeled vehicles, in a car you have to take it carefully.

There is a farm on that road and bin lorries do go that way without a problem. I happened to see someone in the pub who has driven them that way and he said 'no problem, there is plenty of space and referred to the fact they have to collect rubbish from the farm.

Also in this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419745389/history should not be tagged as hgv=no. Signage prior to the turn https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=547111949711585 indicates that the bridge has a maxweight of 10 tons, which will exclude most hgvs but not all. This should be tagged as maxweight=10.
Geograph is also a useful source of usable images in the GB.
For example https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/551936

Cheers Phil
s4br1 (2021-10-22 15:47:22+00:00): Many thanks for the advice.

The crew I spoke to was specifically referring to Drakey Lane joining the B5063 to the tertiary way with ID 369403093. Their comment was "Lane not suitable for motor vehicles take next right turn [from the B5063] to Horton". There are no bin collections along Drakey Lane, and the farm bin can be collected from the tertiary road.

It would be useful to know how to tag roads that are unsuitable for general transit but may be used by the resident farmer (or whoever). In this case it might work to mark it as "highway=service" so that routing servers will enter the road only if the destination is on it. Would that be more reasonable?
Richard (2021-10-24 14:42:10+00:00): Adding motor_vehicle=discouraged is a good way of mapping roads where motor vehicles are allowed but there's signage discouraging use.

highway=service should only be used in a rural context like this if you add access tags (i.e. motor_vehicle=, bicycle=, foot=, horse=...). Otherwise it's difficult to distinguish from a farm road with no right of access.
trigpoint (2021-10-25 17:23:00+00:00): I have updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30408422 to reflect legal access, changed motor_vehicle to discouraged and added weight and smoothness tags.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 00:23:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701368141/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
tux67 (2021-10-23 09:14:56+00:00): Hi, du hattest review requested geklickt. Ist der Spechtweg ist von der Klusenstraße aus Einbahnstraße? Wenn ja, dann wäre oneway und oneway:bicycle die einfachere Lösung.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112805564
Neuwessi11 (2021-10-23 12:42:47+00:00): Nein, es ist eine 'unechte Einbahnstraße', wie es das Wiki genannt hat. D.h., dort, wo ich die Relation gemacht habe, steht zwar ein Einfahrt-verboten-Schild, aber nirgends ist ein Einbahnstraßenschild.
Und da schien mir, wie im Wiki vorgeschlagen, die No_entry-Relation als das Passendste.
Aber zum einen ist es erst die zweite überhaupt von mir gebastelte Relation, und zum anderen hat sich JOSM gleich doppelt beschwert: JOSM kannte die No_entry-Relation nicht und hat sich außerdem daran gestört, dass ich zwei Wege mit "from" gekennzeichnet habe.
tux67 (2021-10-23 13:58:03+00:00): Wegen der beiden froms .. gibt's einen Grund den Weg nicht als eine Linie zu mappen? 
bei der restriction .. was ist mit restriction:motorcar und keine exception?
Neuwessi11 (2021-10-23 14:13:57+00:00): Ursprünglich war es eine Linie, die ich aufgeteilt habe, weil JOSM das so wollte.
Und was restriction:motorcar angeht, würde das ja nichts daran ändern, dass JOSM es nicht kennt, oder?
tux67 (2021-10-23 14:33:21+00:00): wenn das VZ267 ist, würde das oder restriction:vehicle (dann aber mit exception bicycle) das Verbot genauer definieren.
Neuwessi11 (2021-10-23 14:45:16+00:00): Dann mache ich das mal.
Ich habe gerade mal in der englischen Wiki noch ein bisschen gestöbert und dort gefunden, dass die no_entry-Relation aus irgendwelchen Gründen bisher von den meisten Programmen inkl. JOSM und OsmAnd nicht unterstützt wird.
Da ich aber finde, dass diese Relation eine wirklich gute Sache für Umstände wie an dieser Stelle ist, werde ich sie trotzdem benutzen und vielleicht noch auf Github bei OsmAnd vorbeigucken.
Lee Carré (2022-02-22 23:44:05+00:00): Planning application for Moneypenny Lane: http://www.gov.je/citizen/planning/pages/PlanningApplicationDetail.aspx?s=1&r=A/2021/0966
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-04 22:40:32+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=845750#p845750 ? Jest wątpliwość co do usuwani imion