piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mercator 1958 (2019-12-15 13:13:46+00:00): ... Mais elle peut bien entendu être incorrecte à certains endroits. Quand au point que tu montres à l'EST de Martelinville, je n'ai certainement pas modifié la piste à cet endroit qui est bien en dehors du GR. Ou alors par erreur et dans ce cas désolé. pour le reste, je suis d'accord avec tes arguments.
SHARCRASH (2019-12-15 14:41:57+00:00): Merci pour la réponse!

Note sur les traces GPS, elles ne constituent pas un valeur sûre de précision étant donné la dépendance aux connections satellites, influence de l'environnement, etc. Evidemment s'il n'y a rien de mieux sans vérification, pourquoi pas, mais alors avec un tag description (pour informer les utilisateurs non contributeurs) et fixme.

Je me suis permis de dire que c'est vous car la dernière modification de l'historique du node même que je vous ai signalé est attribué à vous et le bâtiment que vous avez crée est également peu précis.

Pour votre info, JOSM qui est un editeur beaucoup plus évolué que Potlatch, vous permettre de contribuer plus vite, plus précisément et d'avoir d'accès à une variété d'images sat. et autres données telles que le heatmap de Strava (via une manipulation d'installation).
Mercator 1958 (2019-12-15 15:28:06+00:00): Pas de soucis, je sais qu'il ne faut pas prendre les traces GPS pour une référence absolue. D’ailleurs, j'ai souvent 2 ou 3 GPS (Montre Suunto, Etrex et Smartphone) et les traces ne sont pas identiques. Avec l'imagerie aérienne, on peut souvent trouver le bon tracé sauf en forêt.

Un problème souvent rencontré est le raccord de chemins manquants que je crée, sur des routes/chemins tracés il y a longtemps et mal positionnés. C'est fréquent dans certaines régions. On ne peut pas tout corriger d'un coup. Je pense qu'il vaut mieux ajouter ce qui existe à coup sur, qui à avoir une petite incohérence au raccord tant que le reste ne sera pas amélioré.

Et concernant JOSM, il y a longtemps que je me dit que je dois trouver du temps pour m'y mettre ...

Bonne carto !
Hjart (2019-09-02 18:45:00+00:00): When editing in Denmark please make sure to use our national SDFE aerial imagery. You can do that by opening iD in Denmark (don't open iD in another country then find some place in DK!)
seasack (2019-09-02 18:53:13+00:00): Thanks! I still consider myself a newbie. I hope my contributions are still OK.
Hjart (2019-09-02 19:00:54+00:00): They are ok :-). I've allowed myself to polish here and there. Didn't find any actual errors
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
EneaSuper (2019-09-03 11:24:15+00:00): Sicuro che non si tratti di questa statua?

http://www.pietredellamemoria.it/pietre/monumento-a-genova-ai-mutilati-e-invalidi-di-guerra/
◪ Jarv (2019-09-03 13:50:16+00:00): Is this the current layout of the A23 (and surrounding road), or is this what the outcome of the changes will be?
smiker (2019-09-03 14:14:39+00:00): The changes mainly reflect the current layout which will become the main traffic flow. Ive left the bus lanes in the west side although this is currently closed for the works to complete. This will need to be refresh once the final layout is complete.
iWowik (2019-10-17 13:34:32+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.

Часто ее сложно найти.
Пожалуйста, скажите, а откуда вы ее берете?
iWowik (2019-11-23 14:42:15+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о моем комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос.
Где вы находите информацию об адресах домиков?
freeExec (2019-09-03 05:45:31+00:00): Отметил свою дачу баром?
literan (2019-09-03 17:29:05+00:00): ну зачем же вы упорно на русском пишете значение слова vending?? coffee, food - что сложного
literan (2019-09-03 17:29:28+00:00): так их хоть найти в османде можно будет
BCNorwich (2019-09-05 08:02:09+00:00): Hi, I remove some fences from going through buildings.
dazerine (2019-09-02 23:08:02+00:00): There are entire apartment blocks that don't correspond to the PNOA map.
But if you only move only *some* of the nodes, as you do in this and the next changeset, you leave buildings with haphazard shapes.
b-jazz (2019-09-09 18:30:24+00:00): Hi fellow Bryce,

Are you familiar with this neighborhood? Does the park boundary really include private homes? That seems unusual, but not out of the realm of possibility.
hoserab (2019-09-05 22:43:05+00:00): FYI several of the buildings you added in this changeset were previously removed because the buildings no longer exist. E.g. you deleted a brownfield site at the corner of 18th Avenue and Macleod Trail and replaced it with the buildings shown on the Bing satellite imagery, but these buildings were in fact demolished (and previously removed from the map) a couple years ago.

I have since deleted the buildings in question and replaced them with construction zones (or in the case of the old Underwood Block on 1st Street, the new "The Underwood" apartment building).

Please be careful about simply following background satellite imagery; it's not as current as you might think or hope
rainerU (2019-09-03 04:36:52+00:00): Hallo ablue,

Du hast bei der Krone in Albeck building=yes durch area=yes ersetzt. Damit ist jetzt in OSM an dieser Stelle kein Gebäude mehr, nur noch eine Fläche am Boden. Das sollte wieder rückgängig gemacht werden. 
Vielleicht findest du auch ein historic-tag, mit dem ein Geburtshaus getaggt werden kann.

Grüße
Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74011681
Carto'Cité (2019-09-13 10:20:56+00:00): Bonjour bobo1425,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables, ce n'est pas une thématique simple et le terrain est souvent sujet à discussion. Donc tu as ajouté ce que l'on appelle des Doubles Sens Cyclables (DSC). Sur celui-ci (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27869757) tu as laissé cycleway:both=no qui n'est pas cohérent avec cycleway:left=opposite. J'ai corrigé, c'est peut-être l'éditeur iD que tu utilise qui n'a pas su quoi en faire. De manière général je trouve que iD n'est pas super adapté pour s'attaquer à certaines thématiques complexes. Si tu as envie de contribuer sur les aménagements, je t'invite à tester JOSM, qui en dépit des apparence est un logiciels très bien fait et très puissant. Je t'invite aussi  à bien regarder les pages wiki dédiées à la thématique telle que celle-ci (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle).
Bon courage pour tes prochaines contributions et n'hésite pas à solliciter la communauté si tu as des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Hjart (2019-09-02 20:28:18+00:00): "Tilføjet" ville i denne sammenhæng nok lyde lidt mere passende dansk end "tilsat"
mjans (2019-09-20 11:17:06+00:00): Hoi, ik zie dat je heel Maasmechelen Village als 'gebouw' getagd hebt, ik denk dat dit eerder als 'gebied' moet getagd worden :

laduse=retail
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:21:04+00:00): Danku, dat wist ik toen nog niet
Jakka (2019-09-03 09:41:25+00:00): attention width -1 pas bon 0.8 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490724908#map=18/50.51074/4.34362
mvexel (2019-09-03 14:10:52+00:00): Was this business not actually closed then?
I don't know this particular tool but it seems to suggest that someone was on the ground and established that the business has closed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74012879
user_5359 (2019-09-03 15:51:25+00:00): Thanks for the hint, changed to disused:shop.
DressyPear4 (2019-09-03 21:37:55+00:00): Não adicione o que não existe.
Edição revertida
user_5359 (2019-09-03 04:47:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t forget to connect the footpath with the crossing highways.
francians (2019-09-03 05:30:27+00:00): Non sarebbe meglio usare "motor_vehicle:conditional" al posto di "access: conditional", anziché eliminare il tag?
user_3626133 (2019-09-03 05:36:19+00:00): Vero, ma il tag può fare distinzione tra strada chiusa AI VEICOLI da ottobre a maggio e strada chiusa A CHIUNQUE da ottobre a maggio? Perché attualmente la strada risultava incondizionatamente chiusa nel periodo invernale, ma non è chiusa a chi va a piedi, con sci o ciaspole...
francians (2019-09-03 05:39:09+00:00): Si... Usando: motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (oct-jun)
Константин Гам (2019-09-03 22:15:44+00:00): Вы сдвигаете здания с их реальной позиции на значительное расстояние! Пожалуйста изучите справочную информацию о привязке спутниковых снимков!
Kolesova (2019-09-20 18:45:21+00:00): О каких зданиях идет речь?
Константин Гам (2019-09-21 13:18:47+00:00): Вы сами не помните что правили? Понтонный 8, например
Kolesova (2019-09-22 17:04:43+00:00): Улица какая? Все здания находятся согласно снимку спутника.
Константин Гам (2019-09-23 08:07:52+00:00): Спутниковый снимок не является истиной, его необходимо привязать и центрировать по трекам, в этом и проблема...
user_5359 (2019-09-03 04:44:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes. Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
eggie (2019-09-03 06:12:13+00:00): Dag yoghurt.. Op de school ontbreekt nog amenity=school  Dat levert ook een symbool op. Je hebt verder hier een highway=cycleway toegevoegd waar niemand mag komen door access=no toe te voegen.
Begin nooit met access=no Dat is het bord Verboden toegang.
foot=yes en bicycle=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
DressyPear4 (2019-09-03 21:37:37+00:00): Não adicione o que não existe.
Edição revertida
Mr_World (2019-09-07 09:41:13+00:00): Ujednolicenie z czym?
RicoElectrico (2019-09-07 09:43:57+00:00): Z resztą jej odcinków, żeby wszystkie miały identyczną nazwę. W innym przypadku wyszukiwanie może głupieć, a nawigacja dawać dziwne wskazówki przejazdu.
Mr_World (2019-09-07 09:47:42+00:00): To znaczy z tym proponowanym odcinkiem?
RicoElectrico (2019-09-07 10:47:09+00:00): Wychodzi na to że tak ;) Ale i tak edycja ma moim zdaniem sens. Przyjęło się na polskich mapach (jakichkolwiek, czy to geoportal, czy google, czy targeo), że nie dajemy przedrostka "ulica", bo jest dorozumiany. Z popularniejszych map tylko Here się wyłamuje.

Tak więc, przyznam, opis zmiany mógłby być lepszy.
Mr_World (2019-09-07 12:28:41+00:00): Słuszna uwaga o ujednoliceniu, będę uważać)
Ale uniknięcie przedrostka "Ulica" w nielicznych wypadkach może wprowadzać w błąd. Np. w Lublinie można znaleźć "Przejazd", "Koło", "Przeskok", "Nowy Rynek" i "Majdan Tatarski".
Moim zdaniem dobrą praktyką byłoby dopisywanie odpowiednich przedrostków to tagu 'name' i dodanie skróconej nazwy bez przedrostków do tagu 'short_name'. A co wyświetlać wybierze osm-carto czy inny renderer.
ovruni (2019-09-02 23:03:54+00:00): Hola
Estoy revirtiendo esta edición. Esta institución educativa existe, los datos fueron ingresados en coordinación de Mapbox con el Minedu. Puede ver su ubicación en http://ieae.educacionadventista.com/ . De continuar retirando objetos creados por otros voy a denunciar esta cuenta recién creada por vandalismo.
Saludos
Taller14 (2019-09-03 19:38:38+00:00): Hola, de acuerdo no hay problema, ya terminamos de hacer el levantamiento de la información que teniamos.
No seguiremos modificando el OSM.
Saludos
Comune Aq - Ufficio Toponomastica - alji (2019-09-03 08:41:22+00:00): Oh Dio, non di nuovo. Non capisco perche JOSM mi fa questo casino. Va be, lo "pulisco" dopo il sopraluogo d'oggi. Mi serve la mappa urgente per questo. Fammi un favore e controlla le relazioni delle strade principale, ho dimenticato di rimettere i trati del viario comunale nelle relazioni. Grazie per il tuo aiuto.
Ale
5m4u9 (2019-09-03 02:33:24+00:00): hola, en este changeset cambiaste el valor de layer o capa a 2 de un edificio del teleférico, de cierta forma esta mal, porque layer solo ordena un elemento sobre otro y no dice que está en el segundo piso. Para los pisos flotantes se debe añadir buiilding:min_level=1 y building:levels=1. Es un error común que todas hemos cometido :)
user_5359 (2019-09-03 04:38:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question: For what reason do you clear the paths? Don't you want to see them on the map?
Nakaner (2019-09-03 08:39:03+00:00): Hi Mike,

I agree with your change (removing tagging for the renderer) but Martin Wynne added the wrong highway=footway/pedestrian tags again. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74021760 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62169903

Best regards

Michael
pantufla (2023-04-22 18:47:44+00:00): Buenas Schandlers, hay algo raro en la estructura de este elemento> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721325580
kylebarron (2020-01-27 16:21:31+00:00): Shouldn't the West Peak be labeled as either "Mount Olympus West Peak" or as simply "Mount Olympus" without the semicolon? Also, having the semicolon in the `ele` tag means that it doesn't get rendered on most maps.
yasobara (2020-01-28 22:05:59+00:00): Thank you for catching this.
I changed it to "Mount Olympus".
user_5359 (2019-09-03 04:35:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but your comment should be, there exists no waterfall. If waterfall exists, please add this with the right english name.
viloan (2019-09-03 00:13:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse (2019-09-03 23:54:58+00:00): Hello Hooka,
In this edit you've deleted some driveways that someone had restored after you've previously deleted them,  Can you explain what the problem was? Some of them, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446606483/history , were really very clear on the imagery.  It's true that some of the houses (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446606470 ) could benefit from more accuracy - I'm guessing that better imagery is available now than there was 3 years ago, but I don't understand why you've removed the driveways here.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Hooka (2019-09-04 00:55:26+00:00): Marking driveways for the sake of marking driveways is useless data.  Why are some driveways marked and others that clearly could be marked are not marked? What is the benefit.  It also makes the map cluttered.  Maybe to clearly mark a private drive not to confuse it with public road, fine.  But to mark random driveways just to mark them is pointless.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-04 15:28:55+00:00): I don't think whoever mapped these is "marking driveways for the sake of marking driveways", any more than me adding the width of a road, or a verge, or the surface on a track is "for the sake of it". Lots of people find driveways useful so please don't delete them.
By all means improve the quality of things that have been mapped already (and that might mean deleting something that does not actually exist), but deleting things that do exist is just vandalism and will be reverted.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Hooka (2019-09-04 15:35:40+00:00): Pointless. You are adding data that is useless. I work with data. Just because you have to ability to add data doesn’t make it useful. It actually takes away from driveways that should be marked.  No one ever looked at a map and said “if only this clearly visible driveway was marked ten feet from a road.”
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-04 16:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74096401 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some repeat deletions in USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74016329
Hooka (2019-09-04 17:21:08+00:00): Why are you the authority on this subject?  Why are the ten other driveways on Millwood Court not marked?
SomeoneElse (2019-09-04 17:28:55+00:00): I'm a member of OSM's Data Working Group https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group and someone complained that you were deleting valid data.
Obviously things are a bit more complicated that "delete" or "not delete" (hence what I said abouve after "By all means improve the quality of things")
Hooka (2019-09-04 17:30:57+00:00): It can only be improved by deleting the driveways that have no need to be marked.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-04 22:23:26+00:00): What level of detail it's appropriate to map is an interesting question, but it's best discussed as a community rather than by someone just saying "I'll delete anything more detailed than X".  The determining factor is usually the accuracy of the available imagery or other sources - producing more detailed maps than the sources can vouch for clearly makes no sense.  However, that doesn't appear to be the case here; there are a couple of different imagery sources from different times that broadly agree with one another.
OSM thrives by having lots of different people mapping different sorts of things, and some of those things appear "useless" to the people not mapping them.  In the case of driveways, I've never gone out of my way to map them, but some people do (indeed Amazon Logistics has a lot of paid mappers around the world right now adding mostly driveways to OSM).  People making maps can ignore these driveways if they want (so the "map clutter" argument isn't really valid); the only inconvenence is that the file that people need to download when (say) creating a map for a Garmin satnav is larger than it otherwise would be.
Hooka (2019-09-04 22:35:18+00:00): Show me another example of an area that is mapped like the section where I was deleting driveways?  I’ve been using OSM for quite sometime and have never seen an area mapped like this.  It is completely random.  What makes the OG mapper correct?  Just because you can see a driveway doesn’t mean it needs to be mapped.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-08 20:46:36+00:00): Different areas in OSM are mapped with different levels of detail.  One example in the US is https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/34.89262/-82.12807 , but there are others.
itsamap! (2019-09-10 15:40:28+00:00): Hello 
To interject into this conversation as someone who mapped the driveways in my old neighborhood. (I actuality used more detail than these) As far as I know it is good practice to map anything that is on the ground and verifiable. I had a few reasons for mapping mine. 1. I wanted to make a map that was super detailed for the home owners association to use 2. I wanted to say OSM was the best map of my neighborhood. 3. I wanted to add as much detail as possible to see how it effected the Microsoft soundscape app because I wanted to see what data it used so I could be sure and add data that would be useful for it. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/product/soundscape/
I have learned that people use data in unexpected ways so just because I don't see a use for something, as long as it is accurate its good to have because maybe someone is using it or will come up with a way to in the future. Who knows maybe we will all be using RapidiD to map them out in the future.
freebeer (2019-09-03 03:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74017919 where the changeset comment is: revert pokemon tagging vandalism
WillyGarcia (2019-09-03 20:38:53+00:00): I believe you have added a node at the wrong location. Old Faithful already has a node just to the north (listed currently as "tourist attraction," which might not be best). The spot you've marked has no natural feature present.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74016920
andrewwiseman (2019-09-03 20:41:21+00:00): Thanks, you're right. This node was previously listed as a "hamlet" which is not correct. I'll delete it.
WillyGarcia (2019-09-03 20:45:02+00:00): Thanks! Well done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74016920
viloan (2019-09-03 01:57:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:21:39+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
kirma (2019-09-03 04:08:08+00:00): On what basis? As a local editor I can't consider this to be anything but vandalism.
kirma (2019-09-03 04:13:42+00:00): Imagery you have used is massively out of date. Most of the features you removed are present in "Helsinki region orthophoto" background map, but even that map is out of date in comparison to situation on the ground, as the neighbourhood is under constant flux. Please revert.
kirma (2019-09-03 04:36:16+00:00): Reverted on changeset 74019587.
boopington (2019-09-03 04:47:23+00:00): I can assure you that I ruthlessly compare imagery and the only things I removed were trees that appear to be gone.
boopington (2019-09-03 04:50:02+00:00): If I made a mistake i apologize, now get off your horse.