piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:32:28+00:00): Sorry, but this is wrong. Only customers are allowed to enter the car wash, so the tag was correct. OsmAnd can't know whether you are a customer or not, so it preventively does not allow you there. But that is correct. You must not remove correct tags. Immediatelly correct all such changes you have done in Slovakia.
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 20:33:25+00:00): Sorry for this change, I reverted it to original state just now. I was trying to find what's the problem as OsmAnd navigated to nearby motorway and ignored roads in fuel station area, inspite of concrete block barrier and ignored my setting to access private roads. And after hour of trying to navigate into carwash I forgot about this change.
aceman444 (2020-10-25 23:54:09+00:00): OsmAnd does route to vehicle=destination roads so there should be no problem with the tag. If you put your destination before the car wash, it should route you to the correct road (before the building, not on the motorway).
jurajik82 (2020-10-26 22:50:33+00:00): Osmand has a bug for this. I don't want to put destination somewhere else. If OSM is correct in details, Osmand should navigate by choosing POI and Osmand should find correct road, gate, time etc.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 10:46:45+00:00): OK, so OSM was correct in details before your change. Great if OsmAnd has a bug report for this and will access to POI even when marked as 'customer access'. But if you saw the OsmAnd routing rules, it will not be easy to solve. Until then, there is the workaround I described. Changing OSM data is not the solution.
Sanniu (2020-12-20 07:30:26+00:00): Hi
You marked many streets here both as highway=* and as construction=*.
May be you wanted to mark as highway=construction and construction=*?
Former syntax is ignored by most software routing apps.
OrDal (2020-12-20 17:23:20+00:00): Hi,
I don't understand what the problem is,
I would appreciate an explanation.
I have tagged these ways the same as any other constructed way.
Sanniu (2020-12-21 06:25:09+00:00): Sorry, misunderstood, here the values of proposed are bad: construction=tertiary
highway=construction
proposed=secondary

They are not aligned with other values and OsMose jumps on it.
OrDal (2020-12-21 09:41:29+00:00): Oh OK. It because these roads will be highway=tertiary when they will be opened, and highway=secondary in the future.
But if the "proposed" tags causes problem we can remove them, they does not necessary.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-08-16 10:02:04+00:00): V Horšovském Týně by to potřebovalo přidat addr:place
hoserab (2020-10-05 17:48:41+00:00): I have reverted these changes. The SW BRT is not a bus guideway, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus%20guideway to understand the differences. A bus guideway is a road wherein the buses are steered by external means, e.g. a track or special curbs. This road is simply a two-lane, bus-only road where the bus drivers must operate the buses as normal.
Gregory UKR (2020-10-04 15:31:10+00:00): Доданий Вами опис свідчить про те що 
окремих полос руху для велосипедистів на мосту Патона немає. Їх дійсно вже немає? На фотографії зробленої минулого місяця такі полоси ще є https://apostrophe.ua/uploads/image/5b42d7481ed93a2adf4914807610f08d.jpg  Але якщо велосипедних доріжок там вже немає, тоді, мабуть, краще їх просто прибрати з карти, залишивши тільки автомобільні дороги і тротуари.
❤️‍🔥 (2020-10-04 23:11:52+00:00): sorry this was me, I saw a sign that said "Residents access only" so I assumed that was a permanent change
Glassman (2020-10-04 00:35:17+00:00): If this is a driveway it should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Add access=private if you want additional safeguards. Removing a road that is clearly visible from imagery just opens you up to someone else adding  the road back in. If you look in OSM, we have over a 100,000 driveways mapped, mostly in rural areas in the state. 

Can you add it back in or do you need help? 

I'll send you more information on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91917170
DressyPear4 (2020-10-06 12:03:56+00:00): Olá, o building corresponde apenas a área da edificação, nesse caso você adicionou áreas maiores.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91917726
mweper (2020-10-04 12:49:45+00:00): Hola @invokeronline. Me alegra que hayas contribuido al mapa y a esta gran comunidad, pero viendo el comentario del conjunto de cambio me surgió la duda de si este PDI es real o no. 
¿Realmente existe ese comercio?
Recuerda que en OSM se mapea la realidad in situ y no elementos ficticios o temporales de muy corta duración.
invokeronline (2020-10-04 22:10:44+00:00): no se como borrarlo, queria hacer una marca para insertarlo en una pagina web, pero no era real la ubicacion
mweper (2020-10-05 14:45:55+00:00): Ya lo he borrado por usted. Cualquier inquietud que tenga, me puede contactar. Saludos.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-04 06:53:17+00:00): Hi, you can't use Google as a source of information due to copyright issues.
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-04 13:13:51+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91932503 for the above reasons. In terms of odbl compliant sources, you can use both mapillary and openstreetcam which both have coverage in this area.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
user_5359 (2020-10-04 04:06:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use lowercase characters for key and value (building=yes instead BUILDING=YES). Also this tag is for the way not for the nodes on the way.
I have correct this type of error.
AgusQui (2020-10-05 14:12:36+00:00): Por favor, recuerde agregar objetos sólo si está seguro que existen, la estación de servicio que agregó en Beiró no existe.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:05:29+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
emvee (2020-10-25 20:48:22+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you added bicycle=no on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404061194#map=17/40.65683/-73.80922&layers=N but this road has cycleway=shared_lane and is part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7230465

If bicycle=no is really correct, can you remove these also?

Greetings,

Martin.
naveenpf (2020-10-05 10:05:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91919358
Fizzie-DWG (2021-02-13 05:51:26+00:00): Hi CozmoNZ. Just playing with Overpass & I noticed that you mapped this a while back. Thanks for your enthusiasm, but I’m wondering if there's any particular reason that you mapped it as landuse=military + military=danger_area? Thanks, Fizzie
CozmoNz (2021-02-13 06:04:35+00:00): Oh - I didn't notice that. It must have grabbed that from the default "Danger" area section. I'll fix it up - Its an ANFO explosive storage area. So its dangerous but not military :).
Fizzie-DWG (2021-02-13 06:33:39+00:00): Thought it may have been that! Thanks!
Arlo James Barnes (2022-03-03 13:25:30+00:00): Huh, there's more than one! https://osm.org/node/9551917531
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:40:39+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. Try to capitalize proper names when naming. Please fix your edits. Good day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91919772
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:38:49+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. You have tagged your business in a road node. Furthermore You haven't added address and healthcare information. I suggest you edit your changes. If you don't know how please let me know.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91920039
rene78 (2020-10-05 12:44:54+00:00): building=industrial within a military camp? Don't think so 🤔
pitscheplatsch (2020-10-04 08:43:26+00:00): Hi Skepticus, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped driveways which are visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Skepticus (2020-10-04 16:56:21+00:00): The entire area was completely wrong, many were not matching up and many simply do not exists as I can visually confirm as I travel through that area.  I will continue updates with the entire area.
Vinber (2020-10-05 07:18:34+00:00): idem, you add an already existant restaurant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7058248587
wireguy (2020-10-04 11:17:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM haptizum!   You removed the building tag.  I reorganized it a bit, outlining the 3 buildings and making them building=apartment.   I then added the residential to the three buildings.   There's more you can add, building number, address locations, the buldings next door.  Keep mapping!
Sanniu (2020-10-04 13:18:47+00:00): Hi. It is one-way, I suppose?
Ram Ezrah (2020-10-04 14:42:26+00:00): You're right. Corrected
Sanniu (2020-10-04 14:43:10+00:00): Thanks!
Cebderby (2020-10-04 15:13:57+00:00): Vandalism and dragged node reverted.
El vandalismo y el nodo arrastrado revirtieron.
user_8466505 (2020-10-05 05:07:14+00:00): Hi there! Do you think you could tell me what imagery you used for the Wapio Valley Road? It doesn’t align correctly with Bing.

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
highflyer74 (2020-10-05 04:12:10+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier ist einiges drunter und drüber gegangen. Das ist aber nicht weiter schlimm, da dies Dein erster Edit ist. Kannst Du bestätigen, dass das Gebäude nicht rechtwinklig ist?

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren wichtigen Lesestoff gibt es hier:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Viele Grüße aus dem Bremer Osten!
wolfkoeh (2020-10-05 08:20:27+00:00): Danke für deine Hinweise. Und. das Gebäude IST rechtwinklig...
frdl. Grüße
wolfkoeh
highflyer74 (2020-10-05 08:35:21+00:00): Danke Dir! Ich hab's wieder gerade gemacht und das Cafe entsprechend getaggt. Schönen Tag!
abakus_uploader (2020-10-04 22:41:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-10-04 08:16:38+00:00): Dag whizzo... dat zou goed kunnen , maar de website van de voorgaande winkel heb je laten staan. Klopt die nog wel?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-04 08:18:15+00:00): Je tags http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91922950

Kijk je nog even?
Jillis inactivE (2020-10-05 05:49:16+00:00): Ah, ik heb dat in tweede instantie net al aangepast, n.a.v. de opmerking op nummer 4. Het type winkel was ook nog niet gewijzigd van juwelier naar meubelzaak, dat heb ik gisteren gedaan.
Er hoeft niks te gebeuren meer hier.
eggie (2020-10-05 05:53:15+00:00): Jillis... bedankt..
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 14:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102701528 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers in Saudi Arabia.
naveenpf (2020-10-05 10:05:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91923672
ndm (2020-10-06 22:24:27+00:00): I removed the turn restrictions that are redundant due to "oneway=yes".

I left the no u-turns -- I assume that they are signed explciitly.
PT-53 (2020-10-10 07:59:10+00:00): Hallo kartler175,
im OSM-Inspector werden hier
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.95684&lat=47.81983&zoom=15&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
3 Flächen ohne Merkmale angezeigt, die auch nicht (mehr ?) Mitglied einer Relation sind. Vielleicht hängt das ja mit den von Dir gelöschten Relationen zusammen.
Schaust Du Dir das mal an?
Fragende Grüße
aceman444 (2021-05-02 12:26:14+00:00): Zdravim, ta budova plavarne je oznacena ako ruiny. Naozaj je tam funkcna plavaren, ked ste to tak oznacili? A nedavajte na budovu leisure=swimming_pool, nie je cela budova bazenom. Taktiez nazov asi nebude "kryta plavaren", to je skor jej opis a nepatri do znacky 'name'. Tiez znacka swimming_pool=indoor neexistuje, na objekty v budove sa dava indoor=yes a to ste mali pouzit na bod bazena, ktory by ste umiestnili dovnutra budovy spolu s leisure=swimming_pool.
kapazao (2021-10-19 06:03:12+00:00): Hola, acabo de darme cuenta viendo Open Etymology Map (https://www.dsantini.it/etymology/), que las calles con nombre Río Ebro tienen mal el etiquetado de wikidata, este dirige a Río Besaya. ¿Podrías corregirlo?
Un saludo
Jesús Gómez (2021-10-19 08:38:44+00:00): Hola. Gracias por el aviso.
Ya está corregido el identificador a wikidata.
Un saludo.
eggie (2020-10-04 09:34:06+00:00): Beste Rexx.. Svp Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
MVG,
eggie
sorcrosc (2020-10-04 23:34:20+00:00): SekeRob you are using restriction=* tag on nodes but this is a tag used in relations only. It seems you still don't know what this means so please stop and take your time to understand relations and how to make them.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
SekeRob (2020-10-05 10:50:13+00:00): First I here. There are traffic signs that say straight only, left only, right only, the round blue with arrows. As yet not found a different tag to convey what drivers can do, any driver for any vehicle. Kindly point me to the correct tag(s).
SekeRob (2020-10-05 11:05:26+00:00): I've interpreted turn:lanes = right/left/through as tags that go into the lanes segment itself rather that on traffic sign.
And no, relations is still very obscure topic, why I leave shout outs in form of notes on the map the check something, the fix me only popping up if one actually clicks the item.
sorcrosc (2020-10-10 16:48:23+00:00): First let me explain that traffic signs are physical objects and we map them as such where they are located so not a node on the way itself but aside in the actual position of the sign.
Mapping traffic signs is optional and has no direct implications on traffic rules. These are implemented in different ways depend on the prescription.
If there is a maxspeed sign a maxspeed=* tag is applied on the way.
If it is a directional or a no access sign usually oneway=* or access=* tags on the way do the job. By the way we don't have a traffic_sign tag for these and I think putting all those traffic_sign=yes only make noise, this has no meaning.
In rare cases, only when this is not sufficient, a turn restriction is needed.
If you need here is documentation of the plugin for Josm. See the linked videos too:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Turnrestrictions
Here something else to read and explanation of how to work with turn restrictions in iD:
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/adding-turn-restrictions/
SekeRob (2020-10-10 19:32:47+00:00): Read about putting signs in the physical position a few days ago and there being no explicit right or wrong putting them on the road. Trouble is, if you put them on the side, the forward/backward becomes useless. most notably at roundabouts there are typically 3 signs that come together, yield, roundabout and no_entry for those asleep at the wheel, so putting them on the one way  lane makes it easy to say forward/backward for the party whom it should affect. Anyway, the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign leaves it to me entirely open if put on a road node or on the side of the road.

Someone with well over 100k change sets to his name came by one of mine as OSMI threw a fit at a turn restriction because I had managed to put it in twice. The person removed 1, so I'm left with the impression that the system has seeming tolerances. I'll read your linked a articles to see if other lights come on.
cheers.
katpatuka (2021-11-19 13:52:47+00:00): Your changset comment says `diq` is used by Wikipedia and diq.wikipedia.org does exist too but there is no zza.wikipedia.org - so where would any zza related wikipedia links on osm point to?

Though https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=zza#10/38.5933/39.7939 does work correctly...

There's no documentation on osm wiki regarding usage of name:diq versus name:zza - seemingly not very many osm users speaking Kurdish or Zazaca are editing the wiki... ;)
hocu (2021-11-19 14:17:06+00:00): Hi katpatuka. The Multilingual Names article on the wiki[0] indicates that:

> People generally agree on using name:code=* where code is a lowercase language's ISO 639-1 alpha2 code (second column)...

Those language codes could be found at this page [1].

Can't remember where exactly but I remember reading a discussion about the language codes. Someone there mentioned that Wikipedia's own language code convention does not match the ISO 639-2 so it shouldn't be used. That's why I switched `name:diq` to `name:zza`.

About your question, I wish there'd be more Zazaki speaking mappers to discuss it but I'd say we should be using diq.wikipedia.org links for the nodes with `name:zza` as the page for ISO 639-2 codes [1] indicate that `zza` is definitely used for Zazaca, Dimili, Kurmandji.

I was just looking at the same bounding box when you wrote this comment BTW :) There are a lot of places with `name:ku` keys have Kurdish names but looks like the person adding those names was not sure so they appended `(?)` to the name values. I'm planning to send an email to talk-tr about how we should handle those. You can see that the Kurdish names are rendered with those question marks on https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=ku#13/38.9392/38.9912

I haven't been logging into IRC for a while but I hope to see you in the talk-tr thread :)

[0]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
[1]: https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
katpatuka (2021-11-19 17:28:30+00:00): I've just added wikipedia and wikidata tags as well as name:ku, name:diq (!) and name:hy to villages of Maden, Elazığ and noticed that Kurdish names exist in kuwiki but weren't connected to also existing trwiki Q-items so I merged them for all villages with the help of Kategorî:Gundên Madenê where every village mentions the corresponding Turkish name  - a tiring job ;) 

Kategorî:Gundên Melkişîyê exists too and could be correlated to Kategori:Çemişgezek belde ve köyleri... :)
katpatuka (2021-11-19 17:57:47+00:00): ...but when checking some of the names I get the impression that they connect to Pülümür despite its name containing Melkişî - but Şablon:Bajar û gundên Pilêmoriyê is again different... :o

kuwiki seems to be organized differently in some regions so I do better keep my hands off I guess... ;)
eggie (2020-10-04 09:45:05+00:00): Dag daan.. geef svp concreet aan wat je wijzigt.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-04 09:38:31+00:00): Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. editor iD is berucht door onbedoelde verplaatsingen omdat je met de rechtermuis schuift maar ook selecteert.
Je selectie schuift dan mee. Dat gebeurde dus met al die adressen.

Uit de editmodus na upload en dan pas naar een nieuwe locatie. Dan weer bewerken openen. 
Niet te veel veranderingen in één upload, want anders ben je bij een revert weer alle goede aanpassingen kwijt.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-04 09:46:37+00:00): Dag daan.. Dit is niet correct.
Er is al een adresnode en het adres hoort niet nogmaal op de 'buildingshape'.  
Haal je het weer weg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91925321#map=19/51.62755/4.73936
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-04 11:01:14+00:00): Adressen weer verwijderd.
eggie (2020-10-04 09:49:09+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. 
Gr eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 21:14:11+00:00): لماذا تم حذف نقاط من دون سبب؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:41:01+00:00): لماذا تم حذف العنصر التالي:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rK
SHARCRASH (2020-10-04 19:53:59+00:00): Surface=paved incompatible with grade5
Ben Suttor (2020-10-05 09:31:04+00:00): Indeed, corrected to surface=grass
iWowik (2020-10-05 06:33:40+00:00): День добрый!
У меня два вопроса:
1. Это точно улица, а не переулок Героев Майдана?
2. А название улица Пушкина это была ошибка или было переименование и тогда Пушкина надо в old_name занести.
Dyoma (2020-10-05 07:30:42+00:00): my bad. зараз все назад верну
Dyoma (2020-10-05 07:31:22+00:00): 1. так, це провулок
2. Пушкіна була дуже давно, перенесу в old_name
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:06:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
PT-53 (2020-10-05 07:23:44+00:00): Hallo Hindsight007,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz - wie von mir vorgeschlagen - die Gebäude überarbeitet. Das sieht jetzt recht gut aus. Allerdings sind die Adressen jetzt teilweise doppelt vorhanden.
Die Adress-Doubletten an den Garagen sollten noch raus. Machst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße
SekeRob (2020-10-04 10:44:00+00:00): An interesting way of tagging I've not seen before, frist the forward/backward and then = whatever. You've got your job cut out as I've plastered hundreds around Pescara the 'old', T, 1, T2.
That said, who exactly is adding traffic signs around Pescara except me? As yet not anywhere seen them in Pescara and the wider province surroundings but with my ID.
Have a good sunday, I'm going oudoors. Indian summer.
SekeRob (2020-10-04 11:03:27+00:00): BTW, did notice one thing, the visual feed back of where the traffic sign is pointed did disappear. Not a fan of that. Like to see where, which is not always right perpendicular on the street i.e. you've not convinced me.