piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wambacher (2017-08-05 09:56:55+00:00): Hi. please never ever change international boundaries without discussion. This will allways lead to problems.

and: you not enly moved that disputed area, you did it wrong too.

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/981-countries-compare-2017-08-05

all missing and changes boundaries on FRA and ITA are result of your sloppy work :(

i reverted that "fixes" and will wait for any discussion with the international community.

walter/germany
dieterdreist (2017-12-21 11:45:12+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai inserito degli incroci con "zebra" dove in realtà ci sono semafori. (A Roma spesso si trovano entrambi). Quando sono presenti tutti due si usa quello più importante (crossing=traffic_signals)
Un saluto,
Martin
eggie (2017-08-05 05:46:40+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-05 05:58:28+00:00): Stadsstrand de Kade komt niet in het kadaster voor. Wellicht zou je een terugmelding kunnen doen. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=noorderkade%20alkmaar&resultOffset=0&objectId=0361300000003300&geometry.x=111816.01040307&geometry.y=516550.10258923&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0361300000003300
jaap de vries (2017-10-25 13:46:22+00:00): Ik zag dat  je opmerkingen op de kaart had aangebracht terwijl je zelf de winkels al hebt toegevoegd. Zou je daarbij willen opletten dat je de postcodes aan elkaar laat zoals in dit voorbeeld 1234AB dus niet 1234 AB.
Jaap
eggie (2017-08-05 06:02:01+00:00): De adresgegevens staan al op de adresnode en hoeven niet nog eens te worden toegevoegd op het gebouw zelf. Haal je ze er zelf weer af anders staat er een dubbel adres in de OSM data?
eggie (2017-08-05 06:08:49+00:00): PB gestuurd en gevraagd op actie/reactie
eggie (2017-08-06 08:57:26+00:00): adresgegevens verwijderd van gebouw. info overgezet naar adresnode. Geen reactie mapper ontvangen.
os-emmer (2024-02-16 17:35:39+00:00): Hello GPMapper,
you mapped an emergency_service=yes here. What is the meaning of that? Is it possible, that amenity=rescue_station or emergency=disaster_response would be a better fit?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drescue_station
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_response
eggie (2017-08-05 06:03:44+00:00): Ook hier geen info en adressen op het gebouw zelf zetten. Die "horen" op de adresnode. Veander je het zelf?
Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-08-06 08:57:54+00:00): adresgegevens verwijderd van gebouw. info overgezet naar adresnode. Geen reactie mapper ontvangen.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-05 00:33:06+00:00): Cześć, popatrz proszę na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512958106

Budynki, które rysujemy powinny mieć kąty proste, jeśli takie są w rzeczywistości. W edytorze iD łatwo je wyprostować je gdy zaznaczymy, albo klawiszem S, albo opcją z menu kontekstowego.

Jeśli masz jakieś wątpliwości, pisz.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-05 15:35:23+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawę! :)
s3b4s5 (2017-08-05 06:39:58+00:00): ¿Puede ser que haya un error de tipeo en la numeración de puerta? Sería más lógico que sea 2515, y no 1515, que no correspondería a la numeración de la zona.
PabloEsquivel (2017-08-06 00:38:06+00:00): Hola, lo chequeo el lunes en alguna boleta de servicio. Gracias.
literan (2017-08-07 12:32:03+00:00): а зачем вот это "description=Москва, улица Красная Пресня, 36с1, кв. 24" на контуре здания? удалю.
highflyer74 (2017-08-06 09:27:11+00:00): Moin Werner und willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn POIs (wie z.B. Geschäfte) nicht mehr existieren, dann nutze am besten das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix um diese zu taggen. So bleibt die Historie eines Objekts erhalten. Wir löschen in OSM selten, sondern passen Objekte eher an.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-05 14:09:24+00:00): Não é proibido retornar a esquerda neste ponto? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5015415429
GerdP (2017-08-27 07:44:48+00:00): Hi!
Please check highway=secondary_link;construction on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512962034
Did you mean highway=construction + construction=secondary_link ?
eggie (2017-08-06 09:00:05+00:00): Het is mij onduidelijk waar je hier huizen hebt toegevoegd. Wat was je bedoeling?
ardaduck (2017-08-11 19:30:51+00:00): sorry ik had vergeten mijn comment te veranderen
abDoug (2017-09-07 17:28:04+00:00): i deleted these tennis courts because they are private and in general I oppose addition of such things unless properly tagged, and even then I regard them as litter
abDoug (2017-09-07 17:28:58+00:00): ps private as in belonging to a residential complex; if they belonged to a community association I would regard them as worth mapping
hoserab (2017-09-08 01:32:45+00:00): I just don't understand that line of reasoning, Doug. It's one thing to delete something because it's blatantly wrong, but why delete something entirely as "litter"? How can it be "litter"? It's there, it exists: there will never (accurately) be anything else on the map at this exact spot. Would we rather have a blank spot on the map?

Whether it's public or private ought to be irrelevant. There are private golf courses all over; are we going to delete those too? You say "I oppose addition of such things unless properly tagged": why don't you add the information then? "Properly" tag 'em?

I don't mean to single you out, it just seems counterintuitive to rid the map of something that's objectively, factually existent. Especially for no greater purpose than... well, seemingly that you "just don't like it".
southglos (2017-08-04 23:12:49+00:00): Just to let you know I've reverted the changes to the M4 - it was hole-less.
Cheers
DaveF (2017-08-05 12:22:27+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM

This is a duplicated area:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512969527/history#map=19/51.49421/-2.47358

Please update existing polygon if it's not accurately mapped
DaveF (2017-08-05 12:27:41+00:00): Isn't the car park used by the pub any more?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286499145/history#map=18/51.50887/-2.51299
DaveF (2017-08-05 12:32:11+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512969526/history

The road is at ground level. The motorway is tag as a bridge over. There can't be both a bridge & tunnel.
DaveF (2017-08-05 12:45:03+00:00): I've joined the two Winterbourne International Academy together otherwise it registers a two schools.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303150680
BCNorwich (2017-08-05 06:18:04+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The area you are amending to residential is already within an existing residential area. So the new area would not normally be needed and would be deleted/replaced with the new features. However as the new features have not yet been mapped and to avoid anyone re-mapping the tennis area from aerial imagery it might be better to mark the tennis area as disused. I have done this with tags :- disused:leisure=pitch
disused:name=Leigh Tennis Club
disused:sport=tennis. I also added a note explaining this.

I think this achieves what you wanted to do and it will show other mappers easily what has happened.
Regards Bernard

PS explanation of the disused tag here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
Job_ (2017-08-05 16:53:19+00:00): Hi,

Why did you cancel my updates yo the road? I've been there yesterday - there's a brand new road. Bing aerial is out of date
gjergjde (2017-08-05 17:42:39+00:00): Hi, sorry, I have no idea which street is meant. Could you correct please?
Job_ (2017-08-06 11:08:54+00:00): This one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512974912

I already corrected it.
RafalR (2017-08-05 08:34:58+00:00): Stare nazwy ulic powinny pozostać pod innym tagiem jako nazwy historyczne danej ulicy.
iandees (2017-08-05 01:36:21+00:00): There's no rest stop here. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50853134
literan (2017-08-07 13:02:24+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы поверх существующей камеры https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/85728254/history еще одну нарисовали. Откатил.
cadsauxk (2018-01-12 17:30:11+00:00): Oi @Thundercel, tudo bem? No DEER-MG o que está marcado essa LMG-847 está listada como LMG-848. Posso fazer a correção?

abraço!
cadsauxk (2018-01-12 17:31:50+00:00): Ah, esquece, só agora que vi: é LMG-848 até São Pedro, depois vira mesmo LMG-847.
Thundercel (2018-01-20 18:30:32+00:00): Desculpe Gerald, cheguei agora de viagem e infelizmente só pude ver sua msg neste momento. Não me recordo de ter mexido nas siglas das rodovias, mas já que voce identificou que está normal, tudo bem.
LivInTheLookingGlass (2017-08-05 01:24:32+00:00): Correction, January 2018 is the LATEST it could change by. The state of Michigan has not said an exact date, they just gave that deadline.
Glassman (2017-08-05 05:27:41+00:00): I added a path from one of your sidewalks to connect it to the street. This allows routing of pedestrians, cyclists and cars. I'm not familiar with the park so I couldn't the other sidewalks to the street. 

Check out the wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath to see if your trails are better tagged as paths or footways. From the aerial imagery it's hard to tell.
MikeN (2017-08-16 11:14:16+00:00): In OSM, I can't find any convention to tag an apartment complex area as an apartments type; we only have landuse=residential and individual buildings are of type building=apartments.  The entire area could be place=neighborhood.
dgitto (2017-08-05 05:18:47+00:00): Ma la strada non è a livello -1. C'è già il viadotto che sta a livello 1. Non c'è bisogno di farli entrambi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-11 13:27:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2553032299/history - is it simply post office or was it intentionally mapped not as a post office?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-14 13:20:39+00:00): see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3815971
highflyer74 (2017-08-06 14:59:58+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier ist etwas schiefgelaufen. Die Feuerwehr wurde von einem ins andere Gebäude bewegt, aber leider wurde dabei amenity=fire_station gelöscht. Somit wird der Punkt nicht mehr als Feuerwehr erkannt. Ich nehme an, daß es sich noch um eine Feuerwehr handelt? Vielleicht kannst Du Dich kurz melden, damit wir es wieder geradebiegen können :-)

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-16 11:30:32+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
Road–Runner (2024-01-19 22:54:45+00:00): Bitte um Antwort https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4077878
Danke
will_p (2017-08-05 09:03:06+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. Mapping spiral walkways and stairways is difficult and I'm sure the current mapping could be improved, however, your changes made no sense to me. You added a stairway that doesn't exist and joined up ways that are on different levels.
BCNorwich (2017-08-05 09:27:19+00:00): Hello, very sorry that's my fault, I didn't study the layout close enough. I can see now what you're trying to achieve. Thanks for reverting it.
Regards Bernard
user_5359 (2017-09-24 18:06:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
eggie (2017-08-05 08:52:45+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-05 09:00:10+00:00): There is no hotel present on the Railway.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50856180
Mapsme is not an accurate editor for OSM. Please check your edits with iD, potlatch2 or jOSM.
I will delete your contribution here.
Supaplex (2017-08-06 03:55:32+00:00): #tofix duplicated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4730986
abDoug (2017-08-25 16:52:59+00:00): details do not conform to OSM standards
Nakaner (2017-08-29 17:07:38+00:00): Hallo nixmotorix,

ich habe das von dir ergänzte access=no soeben gelöscht. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/503838532 Die Baustelle scheint vorbei zu sein.

Darüber hinaus möchte ich dich hinweisen, dass in diesem Fall schon eine bedingte Beschränkung erfasst war und das Ergänzen von access=no unnötig bis falsch war. Erstens bildet access:conditional=* schon die Beschränkung ab, zum anderen handelt es sich bei dieser Baustelle um ein vorübergehendes Ereignis. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_vor.C3.BCbergehenden_Ereignisse_und_Objekte_tempor.C3.A4rer_Natur

Viele Grüße

Michael
SomeoneElse (2017-08-07 01:18:19+00:00): Oops - you've added a node in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset!
4004 (2017-09-14 10:52:59+00:00): reverted
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:50:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
4004 (2017-09-14 10:52:50+00:00): reverted
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:51:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:52:32+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
4004 (2017-09-14 10:52:43+00:00): reverted, name:be added to some
saikabhi (2017-08-07 07:26:38+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Do not use OSM for testing. Only add real data on the ground.

Thanks
Abhishek
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:54:27+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:55:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DaveF (2017-08-05 10:43:01+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM.

What's there instead of the scrub? In OSM we try to update & replace rather than delete where possible.
edyl (2017-08-05 11:13:14+00:00): Hi, it is now brownfield land ready for building on, so to leave it as green fields is misleading. Will re edit later extent of new buildings and road.
DaveF (2017-08-05 13:05:43+00:00): Excellent. Do you live/work there? If so could you check if this (Oakwood?) is in the correct location?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438157525
Some plans show it at the bend in Jenner Boulevard
edyl (2017-08-05 13:17:00+00:00): I work there sometimes. I have a GPS tracker so will be able to plot the new part of Oakwood Drive that goes to the new DPD depot that opened this week. Where are you, UK or US?
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:56:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:56:53+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DaveF (2017-08-05 10:51:47+00:00): Hi again
Has it been relayed as before it was a 2.5m path?:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGdcqAYXsAAL8sK.jpg
edyl (2017-08-05 11:10:14+00:00): My error, was trying to add a new Road, Oakwood Drive, that leads to the new DPD depot, from Kennel Boulevard.  I have changed it back I think.... Will re edit later.
geow (2017-08-05 09:45:31+00:00): Servus Koeck, welches Symbol möchtest du denn hier sehen? 

Die Enzian-Hütte ist kein Hotel, sondern eine "Almhütte", die Brotzeiten und einfache Gerichte anbietet. Also passt amenity=fast_food oder amenity=restaurant am besten.

Übernachtung wird allenfalls auf Anfrage für wenige Plätze angeboten, das kannst du in description=* unterbringen.

Also kein Grund das als Hotel zu kennzeichnen, auch tourism=alpine_hut wäre falsch.

Auch für Öffnungszeiten gibt es eine festgelegte Schreibweise, ansonsten werden Öffnungszeiten in Anwendungen nicht korrekt angezeigt und ausgewertet. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Am einfachsten kannst du die korrekte Syntax mit diesem Tool erzeugen und per copy+paste gleich übernehmen: http://github.pavie.info/yohours/?oh

Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die Korrekturen gleich selber machts.

Danke
geow
geow (2017-08-05 19:55:00+00:00): Koeck schrieb an geow per PN am 5. August 2017 um 19:21 Uhr:
Die Zeiningers (Besitzer der Enzianhütte) sind meine besten Freunde. Und auf deren Wunsch wollten die das Symbol ,,Resort,, haben! Bitte pfelge das wieder ein, ich habe denen das versprochen.
Danke.
Koeck

Lieber Koeck, OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank, welche versucht, die Wirklichkeit abzubilden. Es ist kein Malprogramm, um Freunden zu imponieren :-)

Eine Auswahl von Objekten und Icons, die in der Hauptkarte (osm-carto) dargestellt werden, kannst du hier nachsehen (nicht vollständig):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Standard_tile_layer

Abgesehen davon, dass leisure=resort in osm-carto nicht dargestellt wird, bist du sicher auch meiner Ansicht, dass die Enzianhütte keine touristische Hotelanlage a la  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resort ist.

Für eine Almwirtschaft ist amenity=restaurant, das höchste der Gefühle. 

Gruß
geow
southglos (2017-08-05 21:41:42+00:00): Hi
I've reverted this (and the previous) changeset that changed the cyclepath into a duplicate Jenner Bvd, as I'm guessing that wasn't the intention.
Cheers
ulmtuelp (2017-08-06 19:07:48+00:00): Die Grasfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233019040
hat beim Editieren einen Schaden erlitten.
Keine Fläche mehr, nur noch ein hin- und rücklaufende Linie. Bitte mal schauen.
RailAir (2017-08-08 12:52:16+00:00): Soll offenbar die Straßenränder darstellen als eine Fläche. Das setzt sich mit Landfläche 188319771 fort. Ich mache mich mal an die Auflösung dran. Dauert aber.
RailAir (2017-08-09 11:50:29+00:00): erledigt!
manoharuss (2017-08-07 05:31:38+00:00): Deletion of wikipedia, wikidata and population tags here as well.
Warin61 (2019-04-06 22:01:00+00:00): No comment .. no idea what source is used .. so I'll just change it.
PierZen (2017-10-07 14:02:13+00:00): url image ?  Je constate que non aligné sur Bing et aimerait comparer par exemple way=13044361, immeuble nettement plus petit que ce que l'on voit sur Bing.
lakedistrict (2017-08-05 11:13:42+00:00): Thanks for the edits. The sign at the gates actually reads "Kirkstone Quarries", and Burlington seem to be the first/only ones to use the spelling "Pett's", previously only the spelling "Pets" has been used. (Defra and OS both use "Pets")

Do you know if it is still active or can the abandoned: tag be added? (from what I understand it is more or less abandoned now)
CasualMapper (2017-08-06 06:21:30+00:00): I'm reading the book Slate Mining in the Lake District by Alastair Cameron and it called it Petts. It went bust in 2012 and was bough by Burlington
http://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/9707126.Burlington_takes_on_failed_firm_s_quarry/
On their website they call it Petts, http://www.burlingtonstone.co.uk/company/heritage/
From the horses mouth? however if you feel it's wrong, please do as you wish, I'm not attached to it ;-)
lakedistrict (2017-08-06 12:52:21+00:00): Thanks for the info, I've added the other names I mentioned into an alt_name tag. :D
user_6269583 (2017-08-08 13:08:51+00:00): Sorry to butt in. The area is called Pets Brae, so Pets would be right. However I bet it's a tax thing from the 2012 bankruptcy - a similar but different name for the new company. it's still active it seems also.
keithonearth (2017-08-05 09:58:17+00:00): I don't normally make major adjustments like this one based purely on imagery. In this case the discrepancy between the imagery and what we had mapped was huge. Slightly further south, in Udaipur, the imagery aligned perfectly with the public GPS track we had, and our mapped road was off. In this area we don't have GPS tracks at present, but I suspect that the imagery is pretty good.
Alecs01 (2017-08-05 11:34:59+00:00): Hi wambacher, there was a second break in the boundary around Mont Blanc, it should be ok now, please have a look
wambacher (2017-08-05 17:17:58+00:00): oops, i only checked all ADMIN boundaries.
thanks for fixing the others