piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-10-14 17:57:00+00:00): De landuse was toch wel iets heel wonderlijks geworden met dat bos door die tuinen. Ook had je er een aantal outers van gemaakt in een zogenaamde multipolygoonrelatie. Dat hoort eigenlijk niet. Gewoon één gesloten vlak van maken. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-14 18:07:19+00:00): Bestaat het poortje met het pad niet meer?
K_Jeroen (2019-10-14 18:11:23+00:00): De eerste keer is even wennen, bedankt voor de tips! Zal er in het vervolg rekening mee houden. 

De brug is al een aantal jaar weg. De poort onder het huis is afgesloten met een hek wat alleen toegankelijk is voor de bewoners. En wordt zodanig aangemerkt als “stuk groen” wat onderhouden wordt door aangrenzende bewoners. ( ik woon er) 

Jeroen
eggie (2019-10-14 20:24:42+00:00): Oke. veel plezier met mappen. Bedankt voor je reactie,
Eggie
surveyor54 (2020-03-07 21:54:36+00:00): Hi,
ist der Stellplatz mittlerweile wirklich kostenfrei?
Auf der Homepage steht immer noch 7,00 €.

Gruß
surveyor54
Oskar-55 (2020-03-09 18:39:19+00:00): Hi,
mir liegt die schriftliche Bestätigung der Gemeinde vor, dass der Stellplatz gebührenfrei ist. Die Homepage der Gemeinde Geiselbach wird in den nächsten Tagen korrigiert.
Gruß
Oskar-55
surveyor54 (2020-03-10 09:28:24+00:00): Hi Oskar,
danke für die Info.

Gruß
surveyor54
eggie (2019-10-14 17:58:37+00:00): Gebruik binnen de bebouwde kom landuse=grass voor kleine stukjes. Dat gas mag niet liggen op de plaats van het bos. Dat kun je beter scheiden. 
gr eggie
DenisJu (2019-10-14 20:10:03+00:00): Hello Chois545,
you are welcome and thank you for your contribution in this area.

- I see some roads that have been deleted and than the same lines redone. So, the history is getting lost. Is not a good practice.
- Some highway have an additional attribute landuse=grass, without a polygon
- Secondary link in a roundabout have 2 lines that is false mapped
-  etc
If you have any questions about existing mapped area, please don't hesitate.

Best Regards
Denis
Chois545 (2019-10-15 21:24:04+00:00): Hello DenisJu, thank you for reaching out and I appreciate the welcome.  Could you provide example locations for your first point about the ways being deleted and an example location for secondary links in a roundabout so I can investigate?  Also, I will correct the issue where landuse=grass was on a highway.  Thanks!
Tijgerd (2019-10-15 08:09:10+00:00): Hi CoraTT!
Welcome to OSM!

Please don't name a house "my house" because it will show up for everyone as "my house"

also, keep the area of a changeset as small as possible.
If you want to change two items which are 1000+ km appart, change them in two different change-sets.
highflyer74 (2019-10-15 11:27:50+00:00): I have reverted this CS due to roads being affected.

@CoraTT: welcome to OSM! Please make yourself familiar with the way OSM works before you edit further. Please check out the following links:

https://learnosm.org/en/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
eggie (2019-10-14 18:03:03+00:00): Svp geen adressen verwijderen. Wanneer een zaak uit dit deel verdwijnt verdwijnt niet het adres. Dit nummer wat je nu gebruik wordt ook al door de Jumbo gebruikt. Een adres is uniek. Dus niet 2x gebruiken. 
Het verdwenen adres zal ik herstellen.
eggie (2019-10-14 18:05:59+00:00): Kadaster adresnode hersteld
viloan (2019-10-14 16:35:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-10-14 16:52:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-10-14 19:26:19+00:00): Ha Dick... Zat al te tobben hier. Dat knooppunt (bord) ligt echter wel bij de molen zelf.(onlogisch) .., maar denk dat het zo wel logischer is voor de routering.  
Er is nu een noodpad richting Groot-Ammers. In juni a.s. is alles klaar. 
Er mag niet aan de dijken worden gewerkt. De route langs de molens heb ik laten liggen. Dat ligt er nu als gravelpad bij wachtend op een asfaltlaag.  
Via de molen gaat niet meer vandaar m'n omweg. 
Groet,
Eggie
n2m (2019-11-22 21:51:34+00:00): Hi, what you actually have done is make the ways inconsistent. A2 from Levan to Vlorë is signed as a motorway with green signage and a 110 km/h speed limit. I'm reverting this change. Cheers.
Baconcrisp (2019-11-22 22:28:56+00:00): I'm sorry if I made it more inconsistent. If I remember correctly the classifications were all over the place on this stretch and there was very little consistency to be found. May I suggest instead of reverting my changeset you could instead make the changes yourself to improve the consistency?

Thank you,
Baconcrisp
n2m (2019-11-22 22:36:59+00:00): I did just that. I saw a lot of changes in this changeset but I didn't have time to look at them all. May I suggest that you make your changes more limited, in scope and area? It makes validation easier. Best.
Baconcrisp (2019-11-22 22:38:01+00:00): I'll be sure to do that in the future! Thank you!

Baconcrisp
flohoff (2019-10-15 13:49:01+00:00): Moin,
weil ich es gerade sehe - Woher kommt das "access=forestry" - Stehen da explizite Schilder und wenn ja welche?

Meist ist access=* falsch weil das nach StVO nicht Beschilderbar ist. Zeichen 250 wäre vehicle=forestry und 252 wäre motor_vehicle=forestry. 

access umfasst auch Fußgänger und Radfahrer. Die dürfe da jetzt wie das getagged ist auch nicht mehr durch - Oder nur zum Bäume fällen.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75680281
Landkartengernot (2019-10-18 16:51:23+00:00): Hallo, Flo!
Ich vergebe immer für Waldwege nur vehicle=forestry oder motor_vehicle=forestry. So gibt es ja auch das Plugin "road signs" an. Es gibt aber wohl Kartierer, die an jeden Waldweg access=forestry schreiben.
Gernot
flohoff (2019-10-19 08:59:57+00:00): Aeh ja - Aber IMMER?

Access tags sollten doch da nur drauf wenn da wirklich was beschildert ist?!?


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#.C3.9Cberpr.C3.BCfbarkeit

Zitat:
Erfasse keine Vorschriften, die nicht durch Gegenstände vor Ort repräsentiert werden

Dinge wie örtliche Verkehrsregeln sollen nur erfasst werden, wenn vor Ort Hinweisschilder oder andere reale Objekte vorhanden sind, die sie repräsentieren (zum Beispiel ein Verkehrsschild oder eine Fahrbahnmarkierung). Andere Vorschriften, die vor Ort nicht in irgendeiner Form als Objekt sichtbar sind, sollen nicht erfasst werden. Durch dieses Kriterium bleiben die in OSM zu erfassenden Vorschriften auf einfache Art überprüfbar. 

Deshalb habe ich gefragt was da für ein Schild steht.

Flo
Landkartengernot (2019-10-19 19:33:52+00:00): Hallo, Flo!
Das access=forestry ist nicht von mir, aber nächstes Mal achte ich drauf, was da steht, und korrigiere es entsprechend. Ich vermute, daß motor_vehicle=forestry zutrifft, will mir das aber vor Ort ansehen.
Gernot
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:29:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
Frans S (2019-10-16 17:51:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Will you be so king to square all the buildings you map with the Q key in iDeditor?
you missed quite a lot.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-10-17 15:05:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Pleas map more accurate, following the outlines of a building and square them with the Q key in iD editor
Please pay also attention on the issues listed by the issue triangle on the right hand menu and solve them before uploading your work
Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
baspng (2019-10-16 20:19:37+00:00): Nesta edição, o mapeador anterior seria preservado no histórico, usando-se apenas alteração e complementação. Na minha opinião, só apagar quando o objeto deixa de existir ou se sua estrutura tiver de ser alterada.
MrAlarming (2019-10-16 20:45:06+00:00): Beleza, muito obrigado!
PT-53 (2019-10-20 12:06:05+00:00): Hallo plennert,
Du hast die Alemannenstraße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422069126/history
mit highway=construction ...  voll gesperrt.
Wie lange soll diese Sperrung voraussichtlich bestehen und wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Fragende Grüße
plennert (2019-10-20 12:22:17+00:00): Das Ende ist mit end-date angegeben, die Infos zur Nachvollziehbarkeit.
PT-53 (2019-10-20 13:47:41+00:00): Der Kran steht also - während der gesamten Bauzeit - auf der Straße, oder?
PT-53 (2019-10-20 13:52:39+00:00): Was ist mit der Einbahnstraßenreglung der Straße auf dem Rain:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125095448/history
Wie kommen die Anwohner dort zu ihren Häusern?
plennert (2019-10-20 19:09:18+00:00): lokale Beschilderung
PT-53 (2019-10-21 08:01:05+00:00): Was heißt lokale Beschilderung?
Wenn ein Fremder zum Gebäude Auf dem Rain 5 möchte, wie soll sein Navi dahin führen?
PT-53 (2019-10-22 06:31:43+00:00): Hallo plennert, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich an der Straße 
Auf dem Rain die Einbahnstraßenregelung aufgehoben. Dann paßt das mit der Sperrung der Allemannenstraße auch zusammen.
Mich würde aber immer noch interessieren, wo man das ganze noch nachlesen kann.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-22 06:36:37+00:00): PS:
Deine Ergänzung vehicle=destination an der Allemannenstraße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422069126/history
bringt so nichts. Die Vollsperrung mit highway=construction kann mit vehicle=destination nicht eingeschränkt werden.
Wenn dort Anlieger (bis zum Kran ?) fahren dürfen, muß an dem entspr. Straßenabschnitt der Allemannenstraße highway=construction wieder raus.
plennert (2019-10-23 14:44:58+00:00): Hallo PT-53
nachlesen kann man dies online nirgends. Daher auch als lokale Kenntnis markiert. Die Erhebung erfolgt(e) vor Ort.
Wenn falsch getaggt, dann ist das Wiki falsch oder von mir falsch interpretiert.
PT-53 (2019-10-23 15:09:36+00:00): Hallo plennert, 
wie schon geschrieben ist highway=construction falsch, wenn dort Anliegerverkehr frei ist.
Gibt es eine Teil-Vollsperrung der Straße und nur der Rest ist für Anlieger frei? 
Falls die ganze Straße für Anlieger frei ist, dann müßte highway=construction wieder auf highway=residential zurück gesetzt und construction=residential komplett gelöscht werden.
Sollte ein Teil voll gesperrt sein und der Rest für Anlieger frei, könnte man die Straße entsprechend teilen und die neuen Abschnitte entsprechend markieren.
Grüße
plennert (2019-10-23 19:07:55+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
das sehe ich nicht so. Die Straße ist eine Baustelle. Vor Ort sind die (Anlieger Frei) Schilder, wie getaggt, vorhanden. Die Realität ist somit wiedergegeben. 
Würde ich sie raus nehmen, würde die Info der Baustelle verloren gehen.

Für den öffentlichen Verkehr ist ein ausreichende Umleitung vorhanden.

Gerne können wir dies weiter am nächsten Stammtisch, in Singen Ende November, weiter diskutieren. 

Das Wiki sollte meiner Meinung nach diesen Fall widergeben, oder ich habe es nicht verstanden. Wie auch immer ... Danke für den Austausch.
Besten Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-24 06:15:09+00:00): Du sagst, die Straße ist eine Baustelle.
Wird denn wirklich an (nicht neben)  der Straße gebaut?
PT-53 (2019-11-04 09:13:13+00:00): Hallo plennert,
wie ist das den nun mit der Realität:
Wird die Straße "umgebaut" oder ist die Straße nur gesperrt?
Fragende Grüße
Marcos Medeiros (2021-05-11 13:04:58+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10155476

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
user_6771650 (2019-10-15 01:11:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions and welcome to Openstreetmap. Please try to avoid changesets that spread multiple continents as it crowds the History page and makes these changesets less manageable. Next time, do separate changesets for separate regions.
AndresDuhour (2021-04-24 11:42:06+00:00): Buen día! En ayres vilas se generó una superposición de usos del suelo, además con distinto nombre. ¿Conoce el lugar para poder corregirlo?
Marcos Medeiros (2021-05-11 13:10:18+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10155542

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
Frans S (2019-10-19 11:00:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. You mapped quite a number of buildings and your mappings are quite good. Great!

Please square all rectangular buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after  each other
You missed 19 buildings which still had to be squared.
Best regards and keep mapping
viloan (2019-10-14 18:18:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DaveF (2019-10-14 18:46:29+00:00): Please reinstate those roads as the do exist.
To the left:
https://snipboard.io/Rp8Nbz.jpg
To the right:
https://snipboard.io/APCfEk.jpg

Are you sure the cul-de-sacs have the same name as the existing road?
CinimodEE (2019-10-15 13:13:27+00:00): https://snipboard.io/Rp8Nbz.jpg is looking from Granville road up the northerly road toward Hopton way

https://snipboard.io/APCfEk.jpg is looking from Granville Road up the southerly road toward Battle Walk

The two bits marked Parallel to Granville Way are the Driveways for the houses.

Please reinstate the changes that I made
DaveF (2019-10-15 13:26:20+00:00): I know where the photographs were shot- I took them.

Driveways are mapped as service roads.

Please revert /your/ erroneous edit.
CinimodEE (2019-10-15 13:39:03+00:00): Hi Dave - thanks for your comment - I have previously been informed that individual driveways are not marked on the map - unless they are long ones and need marking for access - which is why I removed them.  I am happy to stand corrected - but if driveways should be added then there are quite a lot to put on all around the development.

And yes - those two cul-de-sacs are still Granville Road I am lead to understand.
DaveF (2019-10-15 13:55:49+00:00): When i first started in OSM I was informed: "if it's physical & stationary, you can map it"

These service roads are for multiple parking spaces for multiple houses so not even private drives.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
CinimodEE (2019-10-15 15:53:05+00:00): Fair enough - I was told the opposite when I put some driveways on a couple of months back... unfortunately, I can not find the comment on the forum

Those roads you have marked do indeed have multiple parking spaces - the one one on the South Branch is now divided into 2, one half for each house and gated.  The one to the North Branch ONLY supplies a single house and is also now gated...   so essentially part of the property.

There is a service road to the Electricity Housing (in Pink) but you have not added that,  so I am unsure?  

None of the other houses has their driveways on OSM, so I am still a little confused as to why these ones should have?
DaveF (2019-10-15 16:15:39+00:00): I didn't check the substation. Is that the building to the left in my photo? Looks to abut straight onto the road.

Just because something isn't mapped at one location doesn't mean the same object can't be added elsewhere. If you wish to add these parking service roads (& car parks), go for it. It adds good detail to the map.
flohoff (2019-10-15 13:51:07+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich das gerade sehe - du hast das nicht eingetragen - nur jetzt dran rumgebastelt.

Das mit dem landuse=grass für die Straßen halte ich für vollkommen falsch.

Die Straße ist kein landuse=grass. Die Bankette rechts und links ist zwar "Grass" aber die gehört zur Straße - D.h. zur Verkehrsinfrastruktur.

Hast du dir mal den Artikel zu landuse=grass durchgelesen? Das ist zu 90% falsch in Benutzung.

So long ..

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75683602
Frans S (2019-10-17 09:27:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please be more accurate in mapping, and following the outlines of buildings.
You mapped also buildings over highways which are misaligned. You have been warned about that by the issue triangle in the right hand menu of IDeditor.
Please do not ignore these and fix them when you can.
Best regards and keep mapping
andrewwiseman (2020-02-06 22:52:20+00:00): Hi there, you added a number of "village" tags, what do those mean? Thanks
iWowik (2019-10-17 09:37:10+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно ее трудно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы ее берете?
iWowik (2019-11-23 14:51:33+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о моем комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос.
Где вы находите информацию об адресах домиков?
Adam_Piszczek (2022-06-04 18:32:49+00:00): Ambona 
6879427390 od tamtego roku jest przewrócona po silnych wiatrach jakie były.
flohoff (2019-10-15 13:53:10+00:00): Moin,
ich hatte dem RavenDraconis da wegen dem landuse=grass schon geschrieben - Das ziept mich immer so ein bisschen. Im Endeffekt gibts ja kein landuse=grass - Was soll das für eine Nutzung sein. Und am Ende hier die Straße als landuse=grass einzutragen ist dann eben falsch

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75683602

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75684187
Frans S (2019-10-17 10:34:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here , Good work.
Just a  request. Please map buildings individual. You combined several buildings into 1
Best regards and keep mapping
orycteropus1 (2019-10-14 18:54:12+00:00): 
Korr source: Gebäudeadressen des Kantons Bern © Amt für Geoinformation des Kantons
yvecai (2019-10-15 05:22:53+00:00): Are you sure the MTB track is a ski piste on the whole length?
rocou (2019-10-15 10:40:04+00:00): The MTB track is following de the ski piste in the upper and the middle part but not on the whole length. Why do you ask that ? I don't think it is tagged as a ski piste.
yvecai (2019-10-15 14:34:30+00:00): I just saw a piste without piste:difficulty in Opensnowmap this morning. This way : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125826454#map=10/46.6768/7.1700
I agree this is the case for a while, just spotted it after your recent edit. Maybe you know enough to fix?
rocou (2019-10-16 17:39:24+00:00): I deleted the tag "piste". The alpine/downhill routes are tagged separately