piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bkil (2019-05-06 15:03:02+00:00): 1. Why did you delete the node without first discussing?
2. The node seems to be near the mentioned road and similar house numbers can be found nearby, so I don't think that it is way off.
3. In Hungary, we encourage everyone to map their surroundings - if we all only updated our own streets, OSM would be complete already.
4. In Wikipedia, there are notability guidelines which preclude you from adding your own shops, but in OSM, there's only the on the ground rule and verifiability - is there an event venue here or not? The web site says it's here.
https://local.yahoo.com/info-15773224-lakeridge-villa-n-college-hl
https://www.eventective.com/cincinnati-oh/lakeridge-hall-109094.html
https://foursquare.com/v/lakeridge-hall/56793fae498e90197dfa7530
https://www.perfectweddingguide.com/listing/lakeridge-hall-153058/
bkil (2019-05-06 15:07:35+00:00): PeanutButterRemedy: Could you please give me a link where you've discussed all the deletions you have been doing up until now, or to the human who corresponds to your account?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 15:08:43+00:00): Hi bkil, here in the US (and a bit in Canada), we have an SEO that is actively contributing low quality data to OSM and we are having a hard time getting them to follow standards and be good team players. You can read (a lot) more about our struggles in my diary entry: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PeanutButterRemedy/diary/149351
bkil (2019-05-06 15:18:21+00:00): Thanks, I'll read that article. I still don't see what malicious data this building was carrying, though.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 15:19:56+00:00): Right, it might seem like extreme actions are taken for small problems, but when you step back and look at the years of abuse and thousands of additions, it makes more sense.
bkil (2019-05-06 15:20:34+00:00): Do you by any chance have your bot on github? I'd definitely like to have a look to improve false positive rate.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 15:23:19+00:00): Not at this point in time. Read the diary for rationale on that decision. The fact that not a single changeset comment has been addressed by the creator of the nodes leads me to believe there is a 0.0% false positive rate so far (excluding the one typo I made during manual review).
Phyks (2019-05-06 13:38:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Le principal risque en ajoutant des itinéraires est de casser des relations en découpant de voies en tronçons, sans avoir chargé toutes les relations dans la zone. J'ai regardé rapidement les modifications et tout à l'air correct. https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9562291&map=14!46.11!1.8275 le dit aussi.

Il y a quelques attributs qu'il est possible de rajouter en plus qui peuvent être pratiques (voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9298890) : sources et site web, roundtrip=yes (c'est une boucle), distance théorique etc.

L'itinéraire est marqué avec une ref=2, est-ce que cela veut dire que d'autres itinéraires sont gérés par le même office de tourisme et pourraient être intégrés ?

Bonne journée,
-- 
Phyks
mawy33 (2019-05-06 15:22:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Tout d'abord merci d'avoir pris le temps de regarder mes modifications.
Normalement JOSM prévient lorsque ce genre de problème apparait et il télécharge systématiquement les relations liées aux objets je crois.
Pour le ref=2 oui il va y en avoir d'autres. L'idée était de faire vérifier par quelqu'un le premier circuit avant de mettre les autres. De plus le balisage sur site utilise ces numéros. J'ajouterai plus d'infos effectivement ça peut être pratique.
Bonne journée,
Vincent
user_6110846 (2019-05-06 18:18:54+00:00): я не згоден з вами

якщо хочете щоб було POI знайдіть однодумцуів серед старожилів
user_6110846 (2019-05-06 18:20:04+00:00): 

translation 
I do not agree with you

If you want to be a POI, find like-minded people among old-timers
user_6110846 (2019-05-07 09:05:23+00:00): полігон 
буде до тих пір поки 

декілька  інших маперів - старожилів не напишуть що пітримують вашу позицію 

Просіть dudka olehz  mike140 та решта хто більше 3 роки в проекті  

написати що згоден з вами 

proving ground
will be until then

several other masters - old-timers will not write that keep your position

Ask dudka olehz mike140 and the rest of the people over 3 years in the project

write what is agreed with you
KKS (2019-05-07 12:41:28+00:00): Правило придумав про три роки сьогодні зранку чи вчора з вечора? лол
user_6110846 (2019-05-07 14:57:22+00:00): без підтвердження іншими маперами 

я буду вертати полігон 

Вертаю бо ти порушуєш правила 

поведінки -- - ти повинен покликати інших маперів щоб почути їхню думку 

without confirmation by other teams

I will be returning the polygon

I return because you violate the rules of conduct - - you must call other masters to hear their opinion
eggie (2019-05-06 21:03:40+00:00): Oke Boonierik...  footway=sidewalk hoeft niet op die voetpaden. Het is een BUG in editor iD. Het kan er net zo goed weer af.
Landuse is prima zo.
MVG,
Eggie
Phyks (2019-05-06 13:34:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Sur la portion en double sens cyclable (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30712168), j'ajouterai également une caractérisation de l'infrastructure cyclable (si elle existe) avec cycleway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway).

cycleway=opposite_lane s'il y a un marquage de bande cyclable au sol, cycleway=opposite_track s'il y a une vraie piste protégée (séparateur physique) à contresens ou cycleway=opposite (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite) s'il s'agit juste de pictos au sol sans marquage spécifique en largeur.

En cas de doutes, n'hésitez pas à répondre à ce message pour plus de détails :)

Bonne journée,
jujulala (2019-05-06 13:51:00+00:00): Ok merci, 

Je m'étais basé sur le cas S1 recensé ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Rajouter un cycleway=opposite fait pas redondant avec le oneway:bicycle=no ?
Phyks (2019-05-06 13:59:35+00:00): Ok pour le schéma S1 !

La question entre `cycleway:opposite=no` et `cycleway=opposite` n'est, je crois pas tranchée (et resurgit régulièrement sur la liste talk-fr).

Il est très courant de trouver les deux du coup, pour garantir que tous les outils le prennent en compte : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166100247#map=17/48.84140/2.38495.
jujulala (2019-05-06 14:13:23+00:00): ok, je vais le rajouter alors.
Merci pour les infos complémentaires.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 14:10:37+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-06 16:31:30+00:00): Hi MarkSievers, welcome to OSM. 

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

#GolfMapping
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-03-01 04:21:13+00:00): سلام
میشه بفرمایید هدفتون از ایجاد لینک  749990678 چی بوده؟
Reza_koulivand (2019-05-17 09:10:14+00:00): چرا داروخانه آزادی را حذف کردید؟؟
Reza_koulivand (2019-05-17 09:34:58+00:00): چرا دبستان مالک اشتر را حذف کردین؟؟؟
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:44:50+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
saintam1 (2019-05-06 21:12:17+00:00): I've removed the smaller building, thanks!
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 14:10:31+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Gero (2019-06-19 07:44:57+00:00): What is the reason for deleting the cliffs?
RicoElectrico (2019-08-23 10:44:01+00:00): Hej, numery, w tym słupów, dodajemy jako ref, a nie description.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
BCNorwich (2019-05-07 06:46:38+00:00): Hi, the incline can't be down all the way round Way: 688141403, you need to section the way and tag only the downward sections. Regards.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 14:10:26+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Nakaner-repair (2019-05-06 12:04:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69028032, 69028114, 69029122.
aquarix (2019-05-06 12:39:32+00:00): Hallo SAQ1973,
es wäre schön, wenn Sie bei Ihren Änderungen eine kurze Zusammenfassung hinterlegen würden, damit man eine grobe Vorstellung bekommt was geändert wurde.
Siehe im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Schöne Grüße aquarix
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:24:31+00:00): Hello BMM994,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688143020 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688149616
were added in this edit, but they have no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
adlid (2019-05-08 11:03:37+00:00): Hi,

This is not a sports centre, I have had to fix this once already. Please see tagging guide https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre which states: "The swimming pools themselves are marked with leisure=swimming_pool", or in this case, "paddling_pool"
mavl (2019-05-06 16:29:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок сдвигает дорожный знак на 3,9 метра.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1373658248/history  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, как вы определили, что этот знак нужно сдвинуть именно на такую величину?
◪ Jarv (2019-09-18 14:59:26+00:00): I know that this is an old edit. But is there a reason why you made the entire development at Sandrocks residential.
I did a survey a couple of days ago and a 1/4 of it is still under construction.
I've updated it to reflect the current situation.
Off by one (2019-06-01 19:28:54+00:00): Hi Nathan, thanks for contributing to openstreetmap. A couple of things to note:
1. Gilsum Mine Road is probably a tertiary not secondary road (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway)
2. it is split into multiple sections which each need to have this change made.
flother (2019-05-06 14:31:30+00:00): Hi,

I think this is a case where you might be technically correct but that doesn't reflect standard usage. I think most locals consider Lagarfljót as a (very big) river, not a river that flows into a lake named Lögurinn. The Icelandic Wikipedia page for Lagarfljót even includes a section on the name, saying that the name Lögurinn could well come from outsiders, not from people local to the river/lake.

https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagarflj%C3%B3t#Lagarflj.C3.B3t_e.C3.B0a_L.C3.B6gurinn.3F

Landmælingar Íslands, as close as we can get to a definitive source, calls the river/lake Lagarfljót. I can't find a feature named Lögurinn in its public datasets.

In light of this, I'd like to rename the lake to Lagarfljót, but keep Lögurinn as an alt_name. Do you have any strong feelings on the issue?

Thanks,
Matt.
Tómas Ingi (2019-05-06 15:12:13+00:00): Hi,

Whether or not locals consider the lake a lake or just a part of the river is, I believe, besides the point; it is, geologically, a lake. It may not have been historically considered as such, and thus the name Lagarfljót was used for the entire river, but any time the lake itself is mentioned in modern texts, it is referred to as "Lögurinn" (see Vísindavefurinn https://www.visindavefur.is/svar.php?id=2955 and Veðurstofan https://www.ust.is/library/Skrar/Einstaklingar/Vatnsgaedi/Vatnatilskipunin/mkt_2013_01_stoduvotn_loka.pdf).

The name "Lagarfljót" has never been used to refer to a lake, it is only used for the river itself in its entirety, and as far as I'm aware the mapping convention is to not name the riverbank separately, so I believe that either the lake should have no name or the name "Lögurinn".
flother (2019-05-07 11:15:36+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the links. After reading them I think we can both be correct without contradicting one another. I think that, to many, Lagarfljót *is* a single entity — it is Lagarfljótsormurinn rather than Lagarormurinn, after all — and naming part it separately could be contentious. But also, in contexts where clarity is required, it might be necessary to separate it into a lake and a river, and name each separately. If you were to use OpenStreetMap data for a general purpose atlas, for example, you might want to label both the lake and river as Lagarfljót. On the other hand, a geological map might want to label to lake and river separately.

I can't think of a good way to handle this dual case on OpenStreetMap, though. I did think of adding loc_name=Lagarfljót to the lake, but I don't really think this tag is supported. In lieu of a more nuanced method of tagging, I'll leave the tags as they are.

Thanks for your reply,
Matt.
mavl (2019-05-06 16:43:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег landuse=residential на целый населённый пункт. Это неправильно, так как населённый пункт включает в себя не только жилую застройку, но промышленные, коммерческие и другие территории.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=en  
  
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-06 13:44:08+00:00): Hi rizkybatubaraa, welcome to OSM.

You mapped many buildings in the last days. Sadly, many of them are not square. Could you correct this? You can find a help page about how to do this here: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69934693

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-06 14:10:17+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
JJIglesias (2019-05-06 14:38:34+00:00): Colegio en INGLES es SCHOOL.

COLLEGE en Castellano es INSTITUTO UNIVERSITARIO...
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:44:52+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:44:54+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
MrMoehritz (2019-05-06 16:07:04+00:00): super!
hab dann auch mal die entsprechende Relation erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9563275
eserte (2019-12-05 15:45:34+00:00): Siehe Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2009372
Karthoo (2019-05-06 17:48:18+00:00): Hello Apollobass and welcome to OSM. Please do not add any personal information to the map. Everyone will be able to see it!
viloan (2019-05-06 13:24:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartonage (2019-05-08 06:04:12+00:00): Hallo hauke-stieler,

du gibst hier an, dass du als Quelle Google Maps benutzt hast.

Bei OSM benutzen wir unter keinen Umständen und in keinem Umfang Google Maps als Quelle.
Ich bitte dich davon abzusehen, danke.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Schöne Grüße
hauke-stieler (2019-05-08 08:11:42+00:00): Das tut mir Leid für die Nutzung einer falschen Quelle. Aber danke für den Hinweis und den Link, ich werde es in Zukunft beherzigen.
viloan (2019-05-06 13:42:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
IIVQ (2019-06-29 12:06:16+00:00): Hoi Stijn,

Goed dat je het fietspad afgesloten hebt gezet, maar let je op dat je het juiste deel dichtzet? Je hebt óók het deel ten oosten van de Jacob van Ruisdaalweg op construction gezet, dat is gewoon open!
yrtimiD (2019-09-28 21:14:23+00:00): Hi, what are these Photo spots? Are they real shops?