piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-12-06 16:41:09+00:00): Hello,
please try to keep your changeset a bit smaller. This one spans over 3 Continents; I was monitoring activities in Somalia and came across your.
Thank you
b-unicycling (2022-12-06 17:28:08+00:00): I'm uploading them individually in JOSM; I don't know how to separate them even further.
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 19:12:41+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Kuiperonline (2022-12-07 04:55:48+00:00): The bridge has a sign: max weight 3.5 tons
mueschel (2022-12-22 16:13:24+00:00): Why did you remove this bridge? Has it been destroyed?
Kuiperonline (2022-12-23 12:52:00+00:00): I am pretty new to osm so I might have something wrong. 
The bridge did not change and is still there. I only wanted to add the max weight limit 3.5 tons
mueschel (2022-12-23 12:59:13+00:00): Hi,
adding maxweight=3.5 is the correct thing to do. Somehow you also changed all other tags on the bridge. I restored them to the version before your edit, as you can see in the history of the way:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161607973/history
Kuiperonline (2022-12-23 14:08:54+00:00): Thanks for explaining
dadavid (2026-04-01 08:28:58+00:00): Hi :) das ford=yes hier war ein Vertipper vor foot=yes, oder? :) habs angepasst, aber schau gern nochmal drüber :) VG

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/168925592
ibanez (2026-04-01 09:18:48+00:00): Hi, ja Vertipper. Danke fürs anpassen. Viele Grüsse
Palolo (2023-02-03 04:15:58+00:00): A community centre is typically a building or social facility, not a village or hamlet. Do you have more information about this location?
RVR015 (2022-12-16 23:18:59+00:00): Hi MatthewAndersonUS80! Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When adding coastline ways, the direction of the way should be counter clockwise: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline. Also, can you provide more insight on the line = yes tag used on many of the coastline ways? Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you!
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 18:51:38+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129794293
hatul (2023-10-18 20:37:20+00:00): אני רואה שהחזרת עוד חלקים לסינגל, הם קיימים בשטח? בעבר היו חסרים.
Tsur Halamish (2023-10-19 18:26:46+00:00): אם אני זוכר נכון התיקונים שעשיתי היו להצמיד את הסינגל למפת החום של סטראבה. על כל הסינגל יש סימוני חום. ניתן היום לעשות מיטוב נוסף.
hatul (2023-10-21 20:57:15+00:00): צריך לעדכן לפי השטח, מפת החום מציגה מידע שיכול להיות לא מעודכן.
כשרצתי לפני שנתיים חלקים מהשביל היו חסרים.
hatul (2023-10-21 21:00:13+00:00): כרגע כל האזור עבר השחתה אז צריך לחכות לתיקון גורף שלו.
chris66 (2022-12-11 10:06:31+00:00): Hi,
where has this mechanical edit been discussed?

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
b-unicycling (2022-12-11 13:33:42+00:00): I don't know anything about a mechanical edit - there is no bot, but the replacement was approved in this proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:archaeological_site
PT-53 (2022-12-11 14:00:26+00:00): Hallo chris66,
hast Du den Hinweis auf diese OSM-Forum-Diskussion
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenedit-von-site-type-zu-archaeological-site-diskutiert-und-abgesprochen/6577/15
vergessen?
Grüße
chris66 (2022-12-12 10:44:26+00:00): @PT-53 Nein, ich wollte hier bewusst keinen deutschsprachigen Text verlinken.
PT-53 (2022-12-12 11:13:17+00:00): @chris66,
was hat der fehlende Hinweis mit der Sprache zu Tun?
chris66 (2022-12-12 11:31:58+00:00): Wiki:

Also, a vote result is never permission for large-scale re-tagging of existing objects. See automated Edits code of conduct for more about this topic.
Luzandro (2022-12-23 10:59:34+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du die Schreibweise der Straßennamen änderst, passe bitte auch die zugehörigen Adressen entsprechend an. 

Ob es sinnvoll ist, alle "Dr." zu "Doktor" zu machen, bis es irgendjemand andersherum - so wie es auf fast allen Straßenschildern steht - wieder besser gefällt, ist aber auch ein wenig fraglich. Auch das Wiki meint dazu: "With some (academic) titles in names the abbreviated version is also the most commonly spelled version"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129791353
wolfbert (2023-04-14 10:33:40+00:00): Gleiches hier. Habe jetzt ein Dutzend falscher Adressen deswegen. Zitat aus dem Wiki: "Die Regel bezieht sich also im Wesentlichen auf das Ausschreiben von Abkürzungen, die genutzt wurden, um Platz zu sparen. "Zedernstr." sollte als "Zedernstraße" ausgeschrieben werden, aber ein "John-F.-Kennedy-Boulevard" sollte nicht als "John-Fitzgerald-Kennedy-Boulevard" eingetragen werden, da die abgekürzte Variante des Namens (John F. Kennedy) gängig ist. Auch manche akademischen Titel können in der abgekürzten Variante beibehalten werden. ... Von den o.g. Regeln abgesehen, solltest du den Namen immer so eintragen, wie er auf den Straßenschildern steht."
wolfbert (2023-04-14 10:45:55+00:00): Forum-Diskussion dazu gibt es hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/strassennamen-in-osterreich/7701
ivanbranco (2022-12-06 18:36:58+00:00): Si chiama davvero "Corridoio" come nome proprio? A me sembra piu' una descrizione.
shoegazer (2022-12-14 21:23:22+00:00): Was war der Anlass, den Abschnitt der B91 als freigegeben zu taggen? Es wird nach wie vor gebaut, Ortskenntnis scheint also nicht vorhanden zu sein. Spätestens bei dem "Knick" am Übergang zum fertigen Knoten hätten man doch stutzig werden müssen und nicht einfach das Luftbild als Quelle nehmen. Bitte rückgängig machen!
shoegazer (2022-12-19 10:42:42+00:00): Ich habe es jetzt selbst korrigiert.
spughetti (2022-12-06 17:48:30+00:00): buildings*
spughetti (2022-12-06 17:48:46+00:00): buildings*
crespo001 (2022-12-06 18:04:56+00:00): Ok.
MxxCon (2022-12-07 03:33:24+00:00): How crooked is it? Is it taking bribes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129793619
gscholz (2022-12-27 05:56:43+00:00): Hi UZ TAXI Samarkand,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways and missing tags:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=66.93852&lat=39.63703&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129793802

Can you please fix this?

Can you please also educate yourself about the meaning of changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
bxl-forever (2022-12-08 11:09:18+00:00): Hello,

I get your point that it’s technically possible to enter this road without encountering any traffic sign stating that cycling is prohibited.

The most logical course of action would be to report this dangerous situation to the authorities and ask them to review the situation and add the missing signs.

A couple of years ago, a mapper changed the highway type from motorway to trunk.  But in Belgium, access tags are identical for both
and the default speed limit is 120 kph (art. 11.2 1°b), less if there are signs.

There are dozens of situations where signs are missing, yet we do not blindly update OSM to reflect such mistakes "because ground truth says so".  Cycle routers are now starting to advise cyclists to ride on this road, it’s clearly not a smart thing to do.

Would you consider undoing your change?
bxl-forever (2022-12-08 11:17:59+00:00): On this Mapillary picture from 2019 the motorway sign is there.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=480180583309075

There is no recent mapillary coverage but if you look at a famous competitor starting with G* which has pictures from May 2022, it looks like this sign was removed or stolen whereas the sign in the other direction—when leaving the motorway—is still there: this seems to confirm that the authorities still consider it to be a true motorway, it’s just that a couple of signs are missing at the moment.  If you’ve been there recently and know on what date you saw no road signs there, please write to them.  (Public works departments are often understaffed and frequently rely on users to know what is going wrong somewhere.) ;-)
Bear-in-a-box (2022-12-09 09:17:31+00:00): Yes, it is a p*** in the ass the lack of clarity. I checked recently (in person) and there are indeed no signs. For any foreigner it is completely non-understandable. Let's see what we hear from the authorities
Xvtn (2022-12-06 21:06:38+00:00): These roads had their name according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. The name:full tag likely contains what you are looking for. Both street signage and locals referring to these roads use only the number and suffix, and omit the directional prefix.
Tatfahren (2022-12-06 19:24:39+00:00): Da hab ich den tab wohl doppelt aufgehabt, und die Beschreibung daher 2x gelöscht...In diesem changeset sollte somit nur die Historie verlängert worden sein.
elgolfo (2022-12-07 08:26:25+00:00): Hi Tatfahren, wo du gerade dabei bist, könntest du noch die anderen Parkplätze des Mappers checken, ob da auch Werbung bei ist?

Beste Grüße
Moritz
Tatfahren (2022-12-07 16:08:29+00:00): Hab ich jetzt gemacht und entsprechend gelöscht, hatte ich gestern nicht mehr dran gedacht. Dieser Parkplatz (P2) wurde einfach über den Metro Parkplatz gezeichnet, dazu warte ich noch auf eine Antwort von dem Ersteller. Die anderen Parkplätze sahen bis auf den Operator (einfach den Namen des Parkplatzes genommen) ok aus.
elgolfo (2022-12-08 16:42:17+00:00): Dankeschön.
mueschel (2022-12-20 11:07:03+00:00): Hallo, was sind denn "ground:levels"? Meinst du 
building:levels:underground ?
swiki (2022-12-20 16:11:51+00:00): Moin, vollkommen richtig, ich meine building:levels:underground; Danke für den Hinweis. Ich ändere das.
swiki (2022-12-25 19:12:36+00:00): Hilf mir doch noch einmal. Habe geschaut und kann "ground:levels" als Tag nicht finden.
mueschel (2022-12-25 19:21:27+00:00): Das stimmt, ich hatte mich gestern darum gekümmert. Danke für's Nachsehen!
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 20:26:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119956704 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119956703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119956702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119956701
These are not unclassified roads, they are service roads because they do not form part of the public road network. Please fix this and also fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119956704 where you attached it to the boundary, not the road
maraf24 (2022-12-06 20:35:57+00:00): Wycofane.
NorthCrab (2022-12-08 03:13:40+00:00): Znakowanie dróg w Polsce dokumentacja:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
maraf24 (2022-12-08 13:15:45+00:00): Tak naprawdę znakowanie dróg w Polsce to jest takie czary-mary. Kilka doświadczonych osób wie, jak to robić, ale nie da się tego łatwo skodyfikować.
NorthCrab (2022-12-08 23:35:55+00:00): Hmm, zawsze myślałem że ta strona jest wystarczająca :P To może powinniśmy ją zaktualizować.
maraf24 (2022-12-09 10:43:17+00:00): Ta strona wyjaśnia znaczenie tagów w osm, ale nie wyjaśnia, jak dobrać wartości tych tagów. Dlatego potrzebne jest doświadczenie, by z kilku możliwych wartości wybrać właściwą.
Jak kiedyś liczylem, ponad 95% oznakowania dróg w OSM jest zgodna z klasyfikacją urzędową. Z pozostałych 5% część to proste i oczywiste przypadki, ale część jest trudna i niejednoznaczna.
Palolo (2022-12-06 20:36:12+00:00): We appreciate the interest in helping map Tanzania, but ask that you accurately map buildings. Use the q key to make square corners. Thank you.
Eino81 (2023-04-09 18:56:06+00:00): Martin, I update this section back to "yes". You added there all "no". This is a valid street and anyone can go there, I was there today, there was no ban on such...
Martin2035 (2023-04-11 13:25:29+00:00): Than you, it was probably a mistake.
impiaaa (2022-12-08 01:12:50+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! Some feedback: Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another, since that makes it easier to review. Second, you can press the "i" button on a field to read more about what each one is meant to be for. For example, "description" should be used to add additional, factual information about a feature, not your own notes or reviews—see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description . That wiki has a lot of information in general about what features can be mapped and good practices for mapping them. Finally, the message when you save your changes should describe what you changed and why—see this page for tips: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2022-12-06 20:34:13+00:00): Dag Gerrist.. Haal je de construction=yes ook nog van de gebouwen? Dan is het correct.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 21:08:52+00:00): construction yes verwijderd..

De info van het bedrijf staat op adresnode nr 5
MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2023-01-09 23:00:03+00:00): Rajca II jest dokładnie z drugiej strony budynku.
maro21 (2025-11-29 14:02:32+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem
joost schouppe (2023-03-07 14:10:42+00:00): Hoi Eebie,
Als je de laag van de verkeersborden erbij neemt, denk ik dat je de constructie aan het rond punt van de Diepenbeekweg nog kan verbeteren. Het lijkt erop dat er ook ten noorden van het rond punt een nieuw stukje fietspad komt
Eebie (2023-03-09 21:05:50+00:00): Voorlopig en sedert maanden is de toegang tot alle nieuwe fietspaden rond de rotonde en op de nieuwe KMO-zone afgezet met bouwhekkens en nadars. Vermoedelijk wacht men op warmer weer om de laatste asfaltlaag op de fietspaden aan te brengen. Er staan ook nog geen verkeersborden voor fietsen. Ik ben pas nog gaan kijken en ik zet het fietspad aan de rotonde ook op construction.
eggie (2022-12-06 20:37:04+00:00): Tip.. in OSM Nederland taggen we bij op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 21:19:08+00:00): Gebouw aan de oostzijde is inmiddels ook geimporteerd.
Gr eggie
4b696d (2023-02-05 09:35:08+00:00): When adding separate cycleways and footways you should also remove the corresponding tags from the main road and preferably add the tags cycleway=separate and sidewalk=separate. Also make sure to copy the tags concerning smoothness and surface. After your edits this junction has quite a few duplicates in terms of cycleways with lacking attributes.
user2137papież (2022-12-07 10:38:58+00:00): wyjaśnisz może po co tu secondary, to jest droga o charakterze lokalnym.
maraf24 (2022-12-07 12:47:17+00:00): Masz bana na edycje w OSM.
user2137papież (2022-12-07 10:38:12+00:00): Co do Ścinawy to zrobili coś co sprawia że ta droga jest niedopuszczalna do innego ruchu niż residental.
Jakka (2022-12-06 21:21:18+00:00): attention vos building se trouve/depasse les berges. dendre
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13542763#map=19/50.71174/3.83374
ualios (2022-12-08 18:25:35+00:00): Ciao Lidia Ferrara e benvenuta su OSM.
Immagino che volevi taggare il B&B/casavacanza Villa Lidia. Il nodo sul quale sei intervenuta è però riferito a una località e lo lascerei stare (population andrebbe bene ma va indicato il numero di residenti), e lascerei perdere anche la relazione di luogo che hai creato, più complessa e da utilizzare in altri ambiti. 
Villa Lidia va messo invece su un nodo a parte, oppure su un'area (edificio o intera proprietà) inserendo tutte le informazioni disponibili. Ho fatto le correzioni minime... eventualmente puoi integrare e/o modificare con altri dati
eggie (2022-12-06 21:26:41+00:00): Dillen.. Probeer je te confirmeren aan de taggingafspraken binnen OSM Nederland.
Overigens geeft website:menu ook nog steeds een foutmelding in de validator van JOSM.
Die tagging is dus niet bij de editor bekend. website:opening uiteraard ook niet wat dat komt uit jouw 'koker'.

Het gevaar van zelfs tags te gaan gebruiken voordat ze zijn geaccepteerd kan resulteren dat medemappers deze weer zullen verwijderen.
De info heb ik overgezet naar de adresnode en amenity=restaurant toegevoegd.

Svp de adresnode gebruiken en niet taggen op een gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
Dillen GJ (2022-12-06 21:58:50+00:00): Ik snap niet wat ik fout doe dus of ik ga Google maps weer gebruiken of hou me louter bij opmerkingen bij adressen zodat het ooit opgepakt kan worden …
eggie (2022-12-06 22:15:42+00:00): Het enige dat verkeerd was is taggen op een gebouwomtrek.
Wat ik doe is screenen.. en dan krijg je een tip hoe wel juist te taggen.
Dus op een adresnode.. overigens zit het paviljoen ergens anders.
Niet te snel de moed opgeven...
Gewoon doormappen iedereen begint zo en ook ik kreeg tips van ervaren mappers.
Je hebt het al zelf hersteld zie ik 
Groet
Eggie
Dillen GJ (2022-12-07 07:17:20+00:00): Mijn prioriteit ligt op dit moment op mantelzorgen en de tijd die mijn familielid nog heeft in kwali-tijd voor haar omzetten… NIET op mappen…
Alle tips zijn welkom Eggie maar heb echt geen tijd om diep in de mapping materie te duiken… Liever had ik gezien dat het OSM een gebruikers opzet had gehad waarbij de gebruiker kan kiezen om data-supplier OF mapper te worden.
Voordeel daarvan is dat je meer gebruikers mobiliseert en OSM (en zijn gebruikers) over heel veel meer lokale bruikbare data beschikt die door mappers op een correcte manier verwerkt kan worden…
Groet, G.J. Dillen
eggie (2022-12-07 07:29:32+00:00): Sterkte G.J.  de komende tijd.
Er zijn overigens wel degelijk mogelijkheden om zonder alle 'ins en outs' te weten te kunnen bijdragen.
Kijk eens naar StreetComplete

Veel mappers zijn daar momenteel mee bezig. 

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete&hl=en_US&gl=US

Je kunt dus op alle niveaus bezig zijn met OSM. 

Groet
eggie
Dillen GJ (2022-12-07 08:46:41+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip Eggie. Heb deze app nu !
Dillen GJ (2022-12-07 08:50:32+00:00): Maar blijkt niet geschikt voor iPad :(
eggie (2022-12-07 08:57:50+00:00): Dacht Go Map wel ...   Even googlen.
PT-53 (2022-12-18 09:44:26+00:00): Hallo einaelbler,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz - wohl aus Versehen - bei diesen beiden Abbiegebeschränkungen 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7442041/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7442042/history
jeweils die to-Mitglieder gelöscht.

Wiki Turn Restriction:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction
QS-Tool Turn Restriction:
- https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=14&lat=48.14624&lon=9.61501&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-01-04 08:55:17+00:00): Hallo einaelbler, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße
und noch ein
Gutes Neues Jahr

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-01-22 09:04:46+00:00): keine Antwort, Schade
ehlerhafte TRs gelöscht
Eman_Mehrez (2022-12-07 08:55:46+00:00): Hello Asemharizi;
We notice that you Changed the Classification for streets
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152928064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152928065
Also, you added a new name for "Ring road"
Could you provide us with the source you added from this name?
Link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152928064
Could you check and fix them, please?
also, we think that those ways should be as it was and there is no need to change the classification from the beginning

Regards,
Eman_Mehrez
Asemharizi (2022-12-07 12:29:19+00:00): Both “Al Daman street”
And “Ring Road” are official names from the municipality of Surman.
Both are are a secondary roads connects  between  “Coastal road” and “Al Anqar Road” which are both a primary highway.
Eman_Mehrez (2022-12-07 14:20:03+00:00): Hello Asemharizi;
For “Al Daman street” you changed the classification to "highway=secondary_link" and it's not suitable in this area it should be "highway=tertiary", Also "Ring road" will be more suitable if it is "highway=tertiary"
see this screenshot:
https://ibb.co/5R4dkqj
For more information about the classification in Wiki OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Could you fix it, please?
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
eggie (2022-12-07 07:11:13+00:00): Hi italkalot..

A parallel sidewalk can be tagged inside the tagging of the mainway with sidewalk=rigt / left / both.
Mapping sidewalks you did results in 'no routing'.  You are a prisoner on your own sidewalk.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Greetz,
eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-12-07 13:28:41+00:00): Hi,

See this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Don't use name=building!
building=yes is all you need!
I fixed it.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-19 19:20:23+00:00): Hi, why did you add bicycle access to Vabaduse väljak? It's explicitly forbidden https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=658363728461940&lat=59.433158900883&lng=24.744026637781985&z=19.9&focus=photo&x=0.7973632509441009&y=0.3944349350242621&zoom=1.9419607394178495

and are there signs in Tammsaare park allowing bicycles?
dgmapping (2023-03-19 19:44:17+00:00): Cycling through the Vabaduse väljak is definitely not prohibited!

The sign probably refers to wide rickshaw types bikes and not regular bikes:
https://news.err.ee/840310/tallinn-city-council-to-introduce-new-bicycle-rickshaw-regulations-in-july

I try to use common sense - when there is a bike parking infrastructure then it also must be routable by bike:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9998188475
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-19 20:32:30+00:00): märk 321
«Jalgratta sõidu keeld»
keelab jalgratta, mopeedi ja pisimopeedi liikluse.

Bicycle parking is on the side of the square and can also be accessed by pushing your bike. I'd say using access tags which are about access by law for the whole square is wrong.

I ride bike a lot, but as a pedestrian I don't like sharing infrastructure with bicycles and we shouldn't direct bikes to places where they don't belong. Bolt cyclists often don't care about safety at all. So I'm not sure about Tammsaare park too. I don't want to be too correct with access tags either, but my common sense is a bit different.
dgmapping (2023-03-19 20:56:53+00:00): If you don't believe me go ahead and survey the sign :) There is an additional 891b tahvel in there - Liiklusmärkide ja teemärgiste tähendused ning nõuded fooridele §21p29
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1231/2202/0002/Lisa_8.pdf
orthocircular (2022-12-06 23:32:26+00:00): Hi Isaac and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please remember to make all changes in a changeset in a small area before editing another area. That way a whole continent of people aren't notified of your change, and also tools like OsmCha and Achavi are able to review your changes without excessive lag.
neuhausr (2022-12-14 20:57:52+00:00): Hi, I appreciate your efforts at adding indigenous place names. However, in this changeset you have not included a source. I see this has been brought up before in other changesets, so I ask again can you please make it a practice to include your sources for every changeset? If this is important enough for you to put all this work into, I would think it's important enough to take the time to properly document sources to help users in the future.

You have added names for many languages in many regions, so I assume these are not merely your personal knowledge. From the outside this looks like an effort at extracting names from online sources and putting them into OSM without any interaction with native speakers. I hope in the future you will consider making an effort to connect with indigenous communities so they can add their own names. If I am misunderstanding your project, though, I'd be happy to learn more. 

There is also an indigenous-mapping channel in the OSM US slack if you'd want to join the discussion there.

Happy mapping!