piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-12-11 14:32:22+00:00): Tip....  Wanneer een bedrijf/winkel verdwijnt laat dan de BAG adresnode intact.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 14:34:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant

shop=vacant

Het adres heb ik hersteld.

MVG
eggie
LopersLos (2022-12-13 12:45:02+00:00): Oke, duidelijk
LopersLos (2022-12-13 13:25:40+00:00): Maar stel dat BAG-code per ongeluk is verdwenen, hoe vind je die dan weer terug?
LopersLos (2022-12-13 13:30:41+00:00): En nog even over shop=vacant >>> de leegstand in het winkelcentrum is enorm. Dat ga ik nog een keer allemaal taggen, maar eerst maar eens de kaart van het dorp bijwerken met zaken die er wél zijn.
eggie (2022-12-13 13:52:57+00:00): Hier staan de BAG codes
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=dorpsplein%20wester&resultOffset=0&objectId=0293100000000322&geometry.x=194876.70801538&geometry.y=441635.68999487&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=

maar ik kijk meestal in de historie of in achavi.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129960351
eggie (2022-12-13 13:53:31+00:00): Yep... Het hoeft vandaag niet af...  :)
eggie (2022-12-11 12:57:21+00:00): Ook een lastige, want er lopen twee routerelaties overheen. Die zijn nu geblokkeerd en dat triggert de foutmelder van Knooppuntnet.nl
https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/
Meestal als iets voor korte tijd is taggen we met conditionaltagging. Dan gaat de weg automatisch weer open in de routingapps.
We gebruiken dan geen highway=construction 

Zomaar een voorbeeld access:conditional=no @ (2022 Sep 20-20223 Apr 3) 

Als je ongeveer de datum weet kun je die tagging gebruike ipv highway=construction. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 12:59:38+00:00): Maar wanneer het bv pas in juni 23 weer opengaat dan kan het op construction blijven.
In febr/mrt dan beter conditinaltags gebruiken.
Matanya Maya (2022-12-11 12:08:28+00:00): #TivonTrails
ivanbranco (2022-12-12 12:20:34+00:00): Hi surveyor54,

why did you change the tag from wikimedia_commons=* to image=*?

The Wiki says:
"Other third-party databases offer the option of adding images about a certain feature, for example wikimedia_commons=*, that aleviate the problems mentioned above and should be used whenever possible instead of image=*"
surveyor54 (2022-12-12 19:02:42+00:00): Hi,
there is no uniform consensus on this yet.
There is a discussion in the German forum right now.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/image-tag-hotlinks-und-format/6585/13

One question, what do you actually have to do with this object?

In my area we handle it according to this scheme.

And this is only in my state of Hesse.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oXZ


I don't want to discuss it for a long time, I change it again and that's it.

Best Regards
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2022-12-12 19:22:17+00:00): I guess that's not the case here, but how do I enter a category at Wikimedia Commons? 😟
ivanbranco (2022-12-12 19:29:05+00:00): What you mean by "entering" a category?

If you mean creating one, you can put the category name you want to create instead of "Testosm" here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Testosm

and there's should be a "Create this page" link. Keep in mind that there are guidelines to be followed while creating a commons category: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Naming_categories
surveyor54 (2022-12-12 19:34:13+00:00): My english is not so good, I mean:

I guess that's not the case here, but how do I enter a category of Wikimedia Commons? 

Here an example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121474860
Pol Dellaiera (2022-12-11 17:55:55+00:00): Bonjour Leonlapin,

Pour la seconde fois, serait-il possible d'ajouter un commentaire pour chacun de vos changements afin que l'on puisse comprendre ce qui a changé?

Je vous remercie d'avance.
bxl-forever (2022-12-11 17:55:55+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  But one thing here: unnamed footpaths should not go to associatedStreet relations.
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120980050
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120980051

Those relations are only used to match named highways and houses with addr:* tags
elucci (2022-12-12 10:03:02+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for the clarification, I will fix it. And now that I think about it, it might be also good to change their access= tag from private to destination, as it can be used to reach the Contretype. Wouldn't it be more appropriate?
bxl-forever (2022-12-12 11:36:54+00:00): Indeed.

More precisely, foot=destination, then.
Because "access=destination" means "any vehicle (also cars) can come here if it’s their destination", but I suppose you know this already.
elucci (2022-12-12 14:30:28+00:00): No, you were correct to specify. Given that it is a footpath, I would have assumed that other vehicles, such as cars, were excluded by default
Hb- (2023-12-27 11:23:04+00:00): Hier wurde das Gewässer https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807608957 vom natürlichen Talweg zwischen den Bergen auf einen benachbarten Forstweg verschoben, zu sehen bei Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7552308865/history

Bitte immer mit guten Luftbildern gegenprüfen, z.B.: https://opengeodata.lgln.niedersachsen.de/#dop
Manuel H (2023-12-27 12:27:42+00:00): Danke für den Link zu den Luftbildern, wobei die allerdings auch schon in OSM unter "ESRI" angezeigt werden.

Aber so ganz verstehe ich nicht, warum du eine 1 Jahr alten Änderung an einem unbedeutendem Bächlein kommentierst, das ich an einer Stelle um maximal 2 m verschoben habe, weil es damals auf dem Luftbild so aussah, als ob es dorthin gehört. 
Fast alle Wasserläufe sind dort nicht sonderlich genau. Auch bei dem zackigen Verlauf der Vorgängerversion, die auch nur auf Luftbildern beruhte, ist es praktisch unmöglich, dass diese den genauen Verlauf wiedergab.

Auf den Luftbildern ist der Verlauf MMN nicht so klar erkennbar, wie du es erscheinen lässt. Du hast den Bachlauf auch nicht korrigierst. Kann gut sein, dass dort ein Waldweg ist, aber der ist nicht gemappt. Wenn dir dort ein Weg bekannt ist, könntest du den ja mappen. 

Aber ich habe mir mal die Luftbilder genau angesehen und den Bach auf den mir wahrscheinlichen Verlauf an der Grenze zwischen den beiden Baumvegetation gesetzt.
Da macht aber auch deine Kritik keinen Sinn, weil diesen wahrscheinlichen Verlauf hatte der Bach vorher nicht.

Wenn du einen besseren Verlauf erkennst, kannst du ihn gerne einzeichnen.

Grüße
Hb- (2023-12-27 17:37:27+00:00): OSM lebt sehr gut mit Hinweisen und weniger gut mit Kritik. Daher bitte ich, den Kommentar auch als solchen anzusehen. Auf den Bach stieß ich in Vorbereitung für https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145573786
toto2808 (2022-12-11 12:43:35+00:00): Hallo Experten,
kann dies jemand ggf. prüfen. In dieser Nebenstraße wohnh meine Nichte und die Straße fehlte. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob  ich hier einen Knoten (Verbindung) zur Anschlussstraße setzen muss. Danke.
Jay May (2022-12-11 17:43:46+00:00): Oho ... If I did the whole border line with this mistake, it's going to take me quite a bit of time ...............
Jay May (2022-12-11 17:58:17+00:00): Ahhh, you already did that! Thanks a loooot
ljc_jlyb (2022-12-11 13:26:49+00:00): Please use Maxar or Esri since Bing is really outdated
ALu68 (2022-12-13 07:51:59+00:00): Trivialnamen Fussballplatz Bolzplatz Fischtreppe
eggie (2022-12-11 14:29:22+00:00): .. en anders historic=building		Unspecified historic building.

Wel building=yes terugzetten.
eggie (2022-12-12 14:40:41+00:00): Toch maar even de rendering van het huis teruggetoverd en monument omgezet naar algemeen building.
note omgezet naar description.
Groet,
eggie
LopersLos (2022-12-13 12:57:46+00:00): Gezien en begrepen. Dank.

Toepassen van alle verschillende tags (zoals 'historic') moet ingesleten raken. Vergt tijd.
eggie (2022-12-13 13:06:38+00:00): Ik moet ook steeds weer kijken in die wiki.  :)
LopersLos (2022-12-13 13:57:29+00:00): Dat geloof ik graag :)
eggie (2022-12-11 14:19:14+00:00): Tip... eigelijk kun je beter de key description=  gebruiken.

.. note= is een aanwijzing voor medemappers.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 14:21:31+00:00): Historic=yes of specifieker kan wel.

Monument is hier verkeerd gebruikt.
Dat is een graftombe zoals de Tajmahal.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 14:26:45+00:00): Je hebt building=yes verwijderd  Dus geen rendering meer.

Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic

gebruik bv historic=manor 

maar laat building=yes staan.
LopersLos (2022-12-13 13:01:34+00:00): Oke, gezien
Kovoschiz (2022-12-11 13:53:52+00:00): 1. Please don't remove the connection of `=pedestrian`. It is the vehicular access for service. 
2. If there is no physically raised island, `=mini_roundabout` should still apply to bikes. No need to draw a circle separately.
bzyk69 (2023-08-03 09:32:35+00:00): Co to za głupoty ktoś wypisuje. Jak to przeszło do map?
NorthCrab (2023-08-04 13:46:39+00:00): Wycofane
NorthCrab (2023-08-04 13:50:03+00:00): Wandalizm, wycofane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139443047
SzymonH (2022-12-11 15:49:38+00:00): Jest już sieć trakcyjna? Są przekazane do odbioru? Jeżeli nie to do czasu zakończenia budowy proponuję zostawić je jako construction.
NorthCrab (2022-12-12 02:40:47+00:00): Dopóki nie zaczną funkcjonować, pozostawiłbym je jako construction - też.
NorthCrab (2023-08-04 13:50:39+00:00): Wandalizm, wycofane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139443063
LockOnGuy (2022-12-11 14:26:43+00:00): May I know why did you delete the gate tag? and what is your source?       
Also, please next time say what you deleted in the changeset comment please, thanks.
Abdelrahman_mahmoud (2022-12-11 15:16:41+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
I removed "barrier=gate" because it didn't appear in any satellite images and I used "Esri World Imagery" as my source.
if you are familiar with this area and know there is a gate there. I can revert it back.
Regards
Abdelrahman_mahmoud
LockOnGuy (2022-12-11 15:20:16+00:00): See Esri clarity beta please.
Abdelrahman_mahmoud (2022-12-12 06:52:15+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
"Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" it's not updated in this area
There is an example.
1- "Al Mashreq university" was under construction in "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" and if you opened "Esri World Imagery" it's already built.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8291475117/history
Also, the gate didn't exist in new satellite images.
See this screenshot:
https://ibb.co/dPf9Qtn
Regards
Abdelrahman_mahmoud
puchaczowsky (2022-12-20 16:15:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10253219614 - nieistniejące kominy (i inne budynki zresztą) nie mapujemy jako istniejące
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 16:39:14+00:00): Dodam kilka słów od siebie do komentarza wyżej. W tym przypadku należy zapewne użyć jakiegoś tagu z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix w zależności czy ten komin został celowo wyburzony (demolished:) albo w uszkodzony w wypadku jakiegoś zdarzenia (destroyed:).
MarcoR (2022-12-12 15:11:49+00:00): Ciao!
Occhio che in Italia i numeri civici sono associati al singolo ingresso di un'abitazione/attività e quindi dovrebbero essere mappati come nodi situati nel punto in cui è presente la tipica mattonella con il numero civico. Per maggiori info consulta:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia

Buon mapping,
Marco.
eggie (2022-12-11 14:57:50+00:00): Jurjen.. Die parkeermogelijkheden langs wegen doen we tegenwoordig anders,
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
parking:orientation=perpendicular (in dit geval)

Kan ook soms zijn =diagonal of =parallel

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 17:46:34+00:00): Oke nu.. 'k Zie nog wel een dubbel ingetekend trottoir langs de Otterstraat. Wellicht nog even kijken of dat wel klopt?

Gr eggie
JurjenL (2022-12-11 18:15:48+00:00): Er is hier inderdaad een soort dubbele trotoir: een die langs de huizenrij loopt en ander langs de parking. Tussenin staat een rij bosjes die weer om de paar meter een gat heeft zodat je van trotoir kan doorsteken: https://cdn.binqmedia.nl/Woonwijs/2015/11/14/1049658404/0.jpg
eggie (2022-12-11 19:18:04+00:00): Oke..top!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-26 08:54:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118173136/history has building = pharmacy that was added in this edit
is it an attempt to map amenity=pharmacy ? How building constructed for pharmacy would be meaningfully distinct from other building=retail ?
watmildon (2023-01-13 08:24:23+00:00): Some of the building footprints here had some small bad geometry. They do seem to be caught by the JOSM validator so just be on the lookout.

I also suspect that the chunk of buildings with housenumber 12021 may need specific of different address info. If that's the case I've been leaving a "fixme=survey unit numbers" tag to let someone know that it would be helpful to eventually collect some more data.

Anyhow, good job working through the area. Happy mapping.
watmildon (2023-01-13 08:25:16+00:00): Oh, here's the small fix I made to the building geometry here. In case that is helpful to see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131218810#map=19/40.12251/-75.01550
wireguy (2023-01-13 14:49:55+00:00): Watmildon, thanks for making the corrections.   It's odd.  I run the validator multiple times while I'm making the changes, and fix many issues.   There are several times that it misses spikey buildings or small overlaps.   I've seen a few MR spikey building updates fixing things.   There are also some address surveying that needs to happen (was hoping someone local would jump in and help out :-) )
watmildon (2023-01-13 19:06:43+00:00): Sometimes to tools are inscrutable ha. 

When I did the Indianapolis address import, if the address were somewhat suspicious, I would leave addresses off the buildings entirely and place an address node near the "middle" of the building group with the one address. My hope was this would make is easier to spot places that needed some one the ground work (StreetComplete ect). I'm not sure there's a perfect solution.
MarcoR (2022-12-12 14:59:16+00:00): Ciao!
Se l'attività affitta appartamenti consiglierei di aggiungere il tag tourism=apartment (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:tourism per maggiori info) e volendo anche i contatti principali ( sito web principale, numero di telefono, etc.).

Buon mapping,
Marco.
JezCrow (2022-12-16 00:01:48+00:00): Hi amircah91,
The geometry of this area was mapped ok: it's wrong tagging - incorrectly changed by a previous editor - which flagged this up in your tool. I suggest this way is put back to how I originally mapped it in version 1. I've read that this is possible in JOSM, but I've never used JOSM.
JezCrow (2023-01-23 14:47:54+00:00): No response so I've fixed in changeset 131611016
user_5359 (2022-12-14 05:07:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10253355424. What is the meaning of the tag girth = 6.2 m?
Jrachi (2022-12-12 07:38:45+00:00): Sei sicuro che il percorso esista ancora sul terreno?
Non conosco questa zona in particolare, ma in altre non sono mai esistite indicazioni per la Via Pacifica, mentre il cammino  d'Assisi sono state presenti alcune indicazioni ma mai mantenute.
StC (2022-12-12 08:39:52+00:00): Je ne connais pas moi-même cet itinéraire, et j'ai surtout restauré cette super-relation pour faciliter le suivi. Mais j'ai deux indices qu'il existe encore :

- j'ai personnellement vu des balises très récentes sur le terrain, en France ;

- les parties françaises (Montcenis-Cluny, Cluny-Vézelay) se sont développées dans OSM ces derniers mois.

Pour ma part, je me suis interrogé sur la pertinence de cet itinéraire dans OSM car il ne semble pas soutenu par le Conseil de l'Europe comme d'autres itinéraires européens. Mais s'il est balisé sur le terrain, il me semble que nous devons le conserver.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 08:55:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10253349485/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
RedAuburn (2024-10-26 13:54:51+00:00): ah yeah that's not right. Fixed, thanks :)
robert (2023-03-16 18:05:58+00:00): The problem with doing separate ways for sidewalks is it screws up routing: https://gist.github.com/risicle/c523638c7768b1c3292e8c7b07aa7563
ramthelinefeed (2023-03-16 18:44:46+00:00): Sir, I think you'll find the problem is that the routing algorithm is an idiot :)
Perhaps it could be trained on Green Cross Code videos from the 1970s?
robert (2023-04-02 17:53:44+00:00): There is no information you have conveyed to the OSM data model that could let it know that it's possible to traverse from that footway to Ashmole Street directly. Unless you're about to rewrite the last 20 years of routing technology for us around vague proximity of ways to each other denoting traversability, in OSM we have to work to the "limitations" of what we currently have, and adding sidewalks in the fashion is going to lead to weird routing results for users without really adding much of any use.
ramthelinefeed (2023-04-02 18:00:53+00:00): It's a fairly basic tenet of OSM that we don't 'tag for the renderer'. Neither do we map for the router.  Any human knows that if they are stood on a pavement alongside a road, they can cross to get to the other side (taking into account the business of the road and the proximity of dedicated crossing points). Any pedestrian routing algorithm that can't cope with that concept is a exceedingly dumb.
robert (2023-04-05 17:17:48+00:00): That's all of them that are exceedingly dump then.

Using fuzzy heuristics to determine routability between ways will not work as well as you appear to think it will - making it able to "jump" between apparently unrelated ways would require mappers to go back through the whole of OSM putting in explicit barriers (walls etc.) where we don't want this to be possible. Not going to happen.
ramthelinefeed (2023-04-05 17:55:52+00:00): A way tagged as a 'pavement' (or 'sidewalk') running alongside a way tagged as a 'highway' is obviously not 'entirely unrelated'.
I think you're being silly.
KartoGrapHiti (2023-01-01 22:57:26+00:00): Der Weg an der Lahnstraße hat keine Radwegebenutzungspflicht, sondern ist ein Gehweg mit Freigabe für Radverkehr. Bitte pass zukünftig genauer auf, was beschildert ist, bevor derartige Änderungen vorgenommen werden.
Ich korrigiere es jetzt wieder.
Osmwithspace (2023-01-03 23:50:49+00:00): Okay, danke fürs Ändern. Ich hatte das mit Streetcomplete gemacht und die zu der Schilderkombination am besten passenste Antwortmöglichkeit genommen. Dann fehlt da wohl einfach in Streetcomplete eine passende Antwortmöglichkeit.
CrunchyLight (2022-12-11 15:50:45+00:00): Such a large area created most likely due to adjustment of the residential area close to the Castle Field area in line with reality. Sorry!

Most changes are within the boundry of Bounty Road, Hawkfield Lane and Council Road.
clay_c (2023-01-03 15:52:51+00:00): Hi Wes0,

In this changeset and this other one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129967189 I noticed that the station nodes for Lyndhurst and Kingsland were deleted, and railway=station was added to the corresponding station buildings. According to OSM guidelines, railway=station as an area must represent the station grounds, not the station building: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation

Were these changes intentional? Could you please undo them?

-Clay
clay_c (2023-01-30 01:30:40+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131859931
clay_c (2023-01-30 01:30:41+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131859931
Syl (2022-12-13 10:47:47+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le nom "Cimetière" étant donné que ce n'est pas vraiment le nom mais une description de ce que c'est.
Ganesh61 (2022-12-14 05:45:05+00:00): Bonjour, le soucis d'OpenStreetMap est que si l'on tape cimetière Maysel, il ne trouve rien, peut-être aurais-je dû mettre Cimetière communal ce qui est plus adéquat je pense.
Syl (2022-12-14 10:09:27+00:00): Bonjour, du coup c'est un problème dans les recherches de Nominatim (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Nominatim) pas dans OpenStreetMap. C'est à Nominatim de s'améliorer, on n'a pas à ajouter des noms descriptifs pour corriger ces manques.
"Cimetière communal" m'a l'air d'être autant un nom descriptif. La question est est-ce que ce cimetière a un nom sur le terrain ? Si non il n'y a juste rien à mettre.
Ganesh61 (2022-12-16 18:31:37+00:00): Bonsoir, je ne sais pas si ce cimetière a un nom particulier. En ce moment, je me contente d'ajouter les monuments aux morts sur OpenStreetMap et parfois, je corrige ou rajoute des informations sur les différents villages.
NieWnen (2022-12-11 18:10:58+00:00): Wycofałem (300496947)
NieWnen (2022-12-11 18:11:23+00:00): *129971293
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-14 18:20:25+00:00): Hoi Martin,

Voor de volledigheid en ter info aan anderen, zou je het nummer van de changeset die je terugdraait in je changeset comment willen vermelden?
Martin Borsje (2022-12-14 18:47:09+00:00): Je hebt gelijk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129956963
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-14 19:05:03+00:00): Dankjewel :)
kwiatek_123 (2022-12-11 16:50:18+00:00): Kropka to nie jest prawidłowy opis zmian
NieWnen (2022-12-11 18:10:44+00:00): Wycofałem (300496947)
NieWnen (2022-12-11 18:11:18+00:00): *129971293
marczoutendijk (2022-12-11 19:12:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6650

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
archie (2022-12-11 17:03:15+00:00): Mycket bra att du flyttade place till noder. Det är det som gäller för ortnamn i Sverige.
RicoElectrico (2022-12-11 23:39:48+00:00): Cześć, to przesunięcie defibrylatora AED to chyba pomyłka: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9506143028
RicoElectrico (2022-12-12 18:59:51+00:00): Przywróciłem AED na poprzednie miejsce.
stan_ (2023-05-09 20:06:12+00:00): Is there any source for the renaming of the railway station from "Оазис" to "Тәжен"? In the official KTŽ documents I found it still appears as "Oazis"
Jay May (2023-05-10 06:54:53+00:00): Hello. This would mean someone needs to check that on the spot. I did this change around 5 months ago, I don't recall right now how I found the railway station name
maraf24 (2023-03-31 10:55:30+00:00): Hej, co to za słupek tutaj dodałeś?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3621455
phodgkin (2022-12-21 13:18:16+00:00): Perhaps this is a StreetComplete oddity, but the added tagging around the Northlands roundabout looks odd e.g. on Park Road North:
cycleway:both = separate
oneway = yes
oneway:bicycle = no

The oneway road now appears to have a contra-flow bicycle lane, which is surely not correct?

The original cycleway = separate
tagging seems simpler and better, since it is more clearly saying "don't look here for cycle information!"

Paul H.
confusedbuffalo (2022-12-28 10:44:44+00:00): Hmm, yes, I've now cleaned it up a bit, thanks for pointing that out
mikaeldui (2022-12-11 16:53:26+00:00): Seems iD deleted from bare rock.
AngocA (2023-01-09 17:10:19+00:00): Hola, hemos visto que ha hecho cambios en el área, pero no tienen la precisión adecuada, sobretodo en la siluetas de las construcciones.
Se ha creado un PoW para que discutamos esto: https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/13
Kovoschiz (2022-12-12 10:18:34+00:00): It's not open. Should be kept at `=construction`
archie (2022-12-11 18:09:58+00:00): Varför bytte du från "house" till building=yes?
felipeeugenio (2022-12-11 19:21:10+00:00): Hola Bruno. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos en las cosas, como decir hacía donde van los caminos.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129970108
BrunoTDG0000000 (2022-12-11 20:19:49+00:00): de acuerdo
Carto_Graph (2022-12-21 22:25:27+00:00): Зачем building=yes на территории?
MRT12 (2022-12-22 16:53:08+00:00): A leftover from previous editor - I didn't check the tags of the site, just adjusted the area. Thanks for spotting and correction.