piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vorpalblade (2021-05-18 11:55:56+00:00): No worries -- I just did not want you to spend a lot of time realigning stuff to later discover that it was pointless.

The Mesa County imagery is pretty good (<2m to reality), so if something is wildly off from that, you can probably move it. Or if it is a road imported from TIGER (look for the `tiger:reviewed=no` tag).

Also, if you (a) have an android phone and (b) like walking, you can take a look at StreetComplete.

The iD editor (what you used for this changeset) is pretty friendly for new editors, so don't worry about messing things up too badly. Just don't do mass edits (e.g., convert all `building=house` into `building=yes`).

If it helps, I do watch Mesa County for changesets not my own, and often comment.
vorpalblade (2021-05-15 22:38:39+00:00): Hello, I dropped the description you added to 1911 North 10th Street (generally speaking, `description` and `name` aren't on `building=residential`, and this does not look like an exception).

If you want to add the unit numbers, feel free. :)
vorpalblade (2021-05-15 22:34:14+00:00): Thanks for this update -- I moved the name over to a pitch that enclosed the pitch you edited, and deleted the pitch you modified. I did reference this changeset so that someone can follow the history back.
vorpalblade (2021-05-15 22:09:12+00:00): A few notes on this change:
`addr:street=Norrth Avenue` is probably wrong. For starters `North` is spelled wrong (probably a typo -- everyone makes them), and the address is likely for the entire CMU campus, not specifically for the Health Sciences building (which you added a point inside -- why?). I've gone ahead and copied the singular bit of additional information onto the building (`internet_access=yes`), and I've modified the building tag to be `building=university` -- the `amenity` for the university already exists on https://osm.org/way/423652248 .

Also, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". 

JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
Nonexhudlix (2022-07-03 22:07:00+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast hier in der Sulzbacher Str. in Oppenweiler lanes=2 eingetragen, während turn:lanes gesetzt ist und es offensichtlich einzelne Abbiegespuren gibt. Das scheint nicht plausibel, ich denke da solltest Du mal schauen was da schief gegangen ist und es korrigieren.
ticki_52 (2022-07-04 08:08:13+00:00): Hallo nonexhudlix, danke für den Hinweis. Hab's korrigiert. Gruß ticki_52
gscholz (2021-05-15 05:41:55+00:00): Hi rimugu,
this changeset has destroyed 6 relations: 

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-108.42943&lat=27.03712&zoom=13

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104601034

I have fixed this meanwhile. Please be carefull if you touch relations.
Guido
eggie (2021-05-13 05:36:19+00:00): Hi mapdeep,

This is not the mappers concern to solve the problems with some routers like valhalla.
The routers will follow the way we tag after some time.
I took for validation advice from an experienced mapper.
So please restore the former tagging.

Your edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104601174


Greetz,
eggie
mapdeep (2021-05-13 18:12:53+00:00): The former tagging is restored.

I've also informed the router project of adding support for years in conditional restrictions. Thanks for your input.
eggie (2021-05-13 18:15:47+00:00): Top!
eggie (2021-05-13 05:43:01+00:00): Top!
The reason we use conditional tagging is to solve the problem in case some mappers will retag a road into highway=construction.


Have a nice day,
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 05:57:21+00:00): Hi mapdeep,
Anyway you are welcome to discuss the 'problem' at the Dutch forum.
English is no problem.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

gr eggie
mapdeep (2021-05-13 18:15:19+00:00): I've informed the router project of adding support for years in conditional restrictions. No change is needed in the tag, and I've ensured that previous tagging has been restored (apart from the reverts that you did).

Thanks for your input and sorry about the extra work this caused you.
eggie (2021-05-13 18:17:37+00:00): No problem.. Hakuna matata
eggie
MoiraPrime (2021-05-13 00:36:05+00:00): *MS 28
skquinn (2021-05-13 04:02:09+00:00): Great work. I just read the story on Jalopnik and was about to update this myself but you beat me to it.
user_5359 (2021-05-13 04:03:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
user_3022894 (2021-06-20 19:38:31+00:00): Hi Bob,
sorry, kurze Nachfrage, die Telefonsäule hier auf dem Fr.-Ebert-Platz, die hat doch ein Dach, nicht wahr? Ich frage, weil das auf Mapillary so den Anschein macht.

Allerdings kann man sich da zugegeben auch schon mal vertun.

Viele Grüße, Lukas
ovruni (2021-05-13 04:33:50+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en ese conjunto de cambios se han borrado nodos para agregar áreas en su lugar, sin embargo al hacerlo se han perdido etiquetas anteriore, ademas de no mantenerse el historial. Por favor revise la documentación sobre mantener el historial, ahi se brinda mayor detalle sobre como proceder en estos casos. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
mirror176 (2022-01-23 01:10:20+00:00): On footway=crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942413941 what is meant by access=yes and layer=-1 tags on this way?
TheDutchMan13 (2022-01-23 02:58:41+00:00): Thanks for noticing that, just checked it and it looks like the layer tag may have been pulled from the sidewalk when i was creating the crosswalk path. The sidewalk shouldn't have that tag either.
TheDutchMan13 (2022-01-24 02:35:58+00:00): Fixed
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-25 03:44:28+00:00): Hi Quang Huy Ku,
your highway digitizing is good. But, 
I have changed the highway classification  based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
How about a track highway classification?
Kindly check with
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/942414215
Thank you.
user_5359 (2021-05-13 17:27:53+00:00): Hello! Please use the key source insetad of saurce!
ovruni (2021-05-13 04:54:18+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios ademas de eliminar nodos de instituciones educativas también se han agregado etiquetas de edificios a áreas que no son edificios, por favor, utilice building para edificaciones individuales.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
RickJSanxez (2021-05-14 03:39:28+00:00): Ok, gracias por las correcciones, estoy aprendiendo a mapear y aunque leo me confundo a veces, gracias por corregir mis errores. Saludos
user_5359 (2021-05-13 03:57:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_11418917 (2021-05-13 03:55:22+00:00): For the sake of God and everything good, for the sake of Persia or Iran. Just stop the vandalism! STOP! We are tired of this, I stopped counting, is this your what 8th account? just stop!                     
Read what I have commented here:        
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104556638 Just read it! slowly!
user_11418917 (2021-05-13 04:08:57+00:00): This is not how things resolve. in the past you used profanity words, and your last edit at changeset 104556638 you threatened your vandalism will continue unless you force the name you want to be in. which this is unacceptable. you can't force things like that. And absolutely you can't use the threatening language here in OSM that is not welcomed here.                        
I added the name you wanted to force in to be the name tag as an alt_name even though it's already on name:fa but I added it anyway as alt_name but that didn't stop you! This is unacceptable                   
If you wanna chat I'm up for it! hit me up and send me a message from you main account and lets just discusse! I wanna hear from you. but just calmly and civilized so we can agree on something without this edit war which is absolutely childish!          
Please reply to me and send me a direct message from your main account. Lets have a talk. Waiting for your message!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104604739
ovruni (2021-05-13 05:25:32+00:00): En este conjunto al eliminar los nodos se pierden diferentes etiquetas de los nodos de instituciones educativas. Estas instituciones educativas fueron ingresadas en coordinación con el Ministerio de Educación que se encuentra documentado en la wiki. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importando_instituciones_educativas_en_Per%C3%BA
mavl (2021-05-14 16:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104694255 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104566429].
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-13 04:41:41+00:00): restore population tags
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-26 11:52:13+00:00): Deat Mateusz Konieczny:
Please stop your singal revert.
This tag is to preserve exact population data not removed by other mapper, because they will think osmcarto do wrong render by population.
If render is not suitable and you find they are hard to communite (not say issue, you can't know how stubborn those people are), the only way is change a tag to describe, utill one day they use correct way to render.


If you still think "do not tag for render" is strict and can't violate by anyway, at any situation,
We only can say that correct render of administrive is strict to us too, and to satisfy your request for "correct tag way"
And, at that time, population and china_population all will be removed, so render is OK, your "guideline" is OK, leave data-completeness to be the victim, will that world you dream?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-26 11:52:59+00:00): This changeset will be revert immediately as the same way you revert it.
user_11435438 (2021-08-26 11:57:32+00:00): 所有人都受伤的世界，完成了呢
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-26 12:32:06+00:00): > because they will think osmcarto do wrong render by population. 

this is not a valid reason to remove correct tags, such as population tags

> If you still think "do not tag for render" is strict and can't violate by anyway, at any situation, 

Yes, also when you really disagree with rendering
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-26 12:48:16+00:00): > this is not a valid reason to remove correct tags, such as population tags

Do you still think this is correct? What is correct?
The correct way is to face the complexity of China's administrative level and significantly larger population than a western town, to use more region defined tag to render correct, instead of accusing others of "your tag is wrong"

Using this way to tag is to solve problem, not create problem
user_11435438 (2021-08-26 13:15:54+00:00): There may be some misunderstandings. The root of the problem is that European maps (including osm) tend to use natural factors (such as the size of a city, which can be reflected in population) to determine the importance of a place on the map. However, the habit of the billions of people in China is determined by administrative factors (administrative district level). So this has caused a contradiction when Chinese mappers are mapping in China. If they follow European mapping habits, the rendered maps will violate the reading habits of Chinese readers, and vice versa, foreign mappers will feel very unaccustomed to map data in China.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-26 13:24:24+00:00): Here is a question usually talked.
A is a county level town with 2000K people, B is a prefecture level city with 300K people, which should be prefered?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-26 13:27:01+00:00): You should judge what level of place it is based on adminlevel, not based on population. 
Population is inaccurate. China’s population is completely different from that of the West. The accusation of china_population is based on the stereotype of the Western model’s global promotion. 
This is data tyranny. So will you face the true problem we faced? You helped? You only removed!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-26 16:08:48+00:00): > You only removed! 

It is untrue, this edit for example added

population=16700

to

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244080420/history

As I am not a part of a local community I will not revert, but I want to express that removal of a correct data is widely considered as a damaging.

Even if it improves display in some specific renderer.

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-26 16:15:35+00:00): > A is a county level town with 2000K people, B is a prefecture level city with 300K people, which should be prefered?

OSM tags should reflect reality, not make decisions what should be shown on a map.

This kind of decisions should be made during map generation and not by mappers.

It is like deleting actually existing roads "because it looks ugly on a map".

At least in this case this population data is imported anyway, so it is not some huge loss.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-28 15:49:52+00:00): If we fight with render developer, I hope that those comment in this changesets can be evidences for edit render way.
(And wish someone "fixing population"can help to improve render)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-28 15:55:29+00:00): We will pause deleting population for a while, but I think you can ask DWG for those china_population problem.(The solver should be familiar with China problem)（Here are votes for this new tag：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/china_population）

Maybe call DWG will be ultimate and put an end to this problem, because we didn’t want to be enemies of world editors at first
fayor (2021-05-13 13:07:36+00:00): Ho sistemato.
Il senso unico, previsto dall'ordinanza n. 42/2018 con direzione nord-sud, è stato invertito con la successiva ordinanza 55/2018, con direzione sud-nord fino a via Mattarella
dgitto (2021-06-06 10:43:55+00:00): e benvenuto in OSM
ygcgjp5 (2023-03-08 13:12:50+00:00): Ar tikrai visas šitas takas yra skirtas tik dviračiams? Ar tikrai pėstieji priversti eiti iki stotelės šalikele?
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-14 06:06:00+00:00): Dviračių IR pėsčiųjų takas žymimas highway=path. https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
SomeoneElse (2021-06-16 22:56:20+00:00): Just checking - are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177187768/history is Kwartel Street?  Because there's one just to the west...
Omotesando (2021-06-18 06:45:12+00:00): I am not sure. My main goal was to fix the alignment problems on the new way. I will remove Kwartel Street from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177187768
archie (2021-05-13 05:28:34+00:00): Raderat dubletter (områden, dvs "closed way" där place=suburb) och där det även finns noder med samma eller rättare likadant  innehåll. Se https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104609499
SomeoneElse (2021-07-03 11:17:31+00:00): Hello,
The edit to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942442156/history lost the historical name here - see http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=777762683 and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/194L .  I've restored back to previous data.
Best Regards,
Andy
Kanchenjunga (2021-07-08 00:00:52+00:00): Thanks for mentioning this and restoring the tags. It looks like Biker69 was trying to remove the name from the R49 section rather than the entire merged way. I will try to verify that no tags were lost after noticing things like this.
Dang101 (2021-07-29 09:59:26+00:00): You have mapped a route over private property
user_12625593 (2021-08-30 14:40:21+00:00): Beste Martin, deze BAG import was ook grotendeels voorbarig. Trollen Daan en Lars komen daar nu zelf mee *rolt ogen* maar ze hebben wel gelijk... https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2827975
Martin Borsje (2021-08-30 15:45:12+00:00): verwijderd
Patchanka (2021-05-19 15:07:20+00:00): salut Carto'Cité
c'est fait exprès ces ways sans aucun attribut ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942447564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942447563
CartoCharles (2021-05-19 15:46:33+00:00): Salut,
Non effectivement j'ai pas fini le travail ici ':D
user_12625593 (2021-08-16 16:06:10+00:00): Martin, graag je aandacht voor mijn bevindingen hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2750377
GinaroZ (2021-06-24 14:56:01+00:00): Hi, just a comment on your use of fixmes. It's probably better to use the OSM notes feature as people are more likely to notice them with the notes layer rather than the fixme tag in the data. :)
ovruni (2021-05-13 07:02:40+00:00): Hola. En este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado 89 vías para agregar otras con geometrias similares, lo cual no permite mantener el historial. [0] También se han eliminado interpolaciones. De la  misma forma se han agregado varios nombres descriptivos, lo cual es desaconsejado. [1] Dado que este es un patrón de edición recurrente de varias cuentas en la misma zona, por favor revise la documentación sobre las directrices de ediciones organizadas. [2] Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
aceman444 (2021-09-13 22:15:24+00:00): Zdravim, pisete novy dom, ale ziadny ste nepridali, ten objekt je oznaceny landuse=farmyard, cize farma (cely jej areal). To je evidentne nezmysel.

Taktiez sa v OSM nesmie do nazvu pisat opis objektu ako ste to urobili "Pristresok". Takyto typ objektu treba vyjadrit prislusnymi znackami (pozrite napr. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building). O ake pristresky tu ide, lebo zo snimok to vyzera ako dost velke budovy, ziadne pristresky. Ak su to stajne alebo nieco podobne, na to su znacky. Dajte mi vediet.
AX666 (2021-09-14 04:52:21+00:00): je to murovana hala resp. pristresok na polnohosp. stroje, otvoreny z dvoch stran
aceman444 (2021-09-14 22:03:54+00:00): Dobre, dakujem. Aj toto mi potom pripada ako 'barn'.
hsc666 (2021-05-13 07:40:58+00:00): Hallo ReneK-NRW und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast hier neben der Geschwindigkeit auch die Angabe lanes=1 ergänzt. Das würde bedeuten, dass die Straße so schmal ist, dass zwei entgegenkommende Fahrzeuge nicht aneinander vorbeifahren könnten. Bitte verwechsle das nicht mit der Angabe von Spuren pro Fahrtrichtung. Ich habe das inzwischen korrigiert. Du kannst Dir das gern nochmal im Editor anschauen. Bei Fragen kannst Du Dich gern wieder hier oder auch im Forum melden.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen!

VG
hsc666
mavl (2021-05-14 14:57:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет здания с адресам и добавляет новые здания, у которых номер дома указан в теге name.
RunTrails (2021-06-07 18:41:11+00:00): The southern part of this trail does not exist. Technically none of these are trails, but the Lion's Head is a popular overlook that people will find their way to in this rock field, so the rest is fine.
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2021-05-13 19:34:38+00:00): merci :)
user_5359 (2021-05-13 13:11:39+00:00): May I ask if you used an additional programme or website for the entry or if someone advised you? I would like to know why you did not use the standard keys for a business entry. Is there a helpful description missing somewhere? The entry could well have been deleted for insufficient quality.
RunTrails (2021-06-07 18:44:42+00:00): There are no trails that follow Red Creek on the north side, please delete.
clnhrn (2021-06-08 05:47:58+00:00): Noted on this. I'll make sure to make the change as advised. Thank you!
gscholz (2021-05-15 06:29:06+00:00): Hi Carlangas1978,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of El Cural and San Simón parte baja:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.27331&lat=4.42365&zoom=14

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104615848

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Carlangas1978 (2021-05-19 01:30:58+00:00): done
pio2_122 (2021-05-13 10:03:45+00:00): Przedwczesna zmiana -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2665580

Wycofane.
maciek-szn (2021-05-13 08:15:17+00:00): Masz jakieś potwierdzenie, że tam będzie Netto? Pytam, gdyż Netto jest już dokładnie po przeciwnej stronie ulicy i trudno spodziewać się dwóch sklepów tej samej marki w takiej odległości.
pio2_122 (2021-05-13 10:21:51+00:00): „Placówki przy ul. Duńskiej oraz Polickiej mają rozpocząć działalność 27 maja. Co ciekawe, to dwa sklepy, które będą sąsiadować z innymi dyskontami Netto. 2 czerwca planowane jest otwarcie sklepu przy ul. Mickiewicza w Szczecinie.”
„Nie wiadomo, jaka będzie przyszłość szczecińskiej sklepów przy ul. Jodłowej i Rydla” (a co ze sklepem przy ul. Milczańskiej?)

Niestety, jest to część masowej edycji sklepów Tesco w całej Polsce np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104619487
Wydaje mi się, że są to również zmiany przedwczesne/niepotwierdzone - „W pierwszym etapie rebranding przechodzi około 40 placówek z 300 sklepów Tesco przejętych przez sieć Netto. (...) Wiadomo, że sieć daje sobie 18 miesięcy na całkowite wygaszenie marki Tesco w Polsce.”

[źródło cytatów: https://wszczecinie.pl/aktualnosci,sklepy_tesco_zmieniaja_sie_w_netto_wiemy_kiedy_przyjma_pierwszych_klientow,id-37764.html]

W związku z tym, dwie edycje na terenie Szczecina wycofałem.
4004 (2021-05-16 23:01:51+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
если у обьекта нет имени собственного, то поле Имя заполнять не нужно. то, что это спортплощадка, понятно из других атрибутов что вы проставили
eginhard (2021-05-14 20:46:52+00:00): JOSM keeps swallowing changeset comments: Added Commons category
Violaine_Do (2021-05-17 21:21:58+00:00): Iaorana, Merci pour votre contribution, il doit y avoir un problème avec la clé operator, la valeur étant "Les"... Est-ce bien voulu?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104618095
eggie (2021-05-13 08:58:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-13 09:07:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback : Tip  .. Een hek kun je toevoegen met barrier=gate op een node.
Daar kan ook de tag access=private nog op. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
OmeWillem (2021-05-13 10:00:55+00:00): Ja, goede tip. Dank, ook voor het welkomstbericht! :)
fkv (2021-05-15 12:24:30+00:00): Ich hab jetzt nicht überprüft, ob deine Änderungen an den Höhlen eine Lageverbesserung oder -verschlechterung sind (normalerweise sind die von mir erfassten Koordinaten schon sehr genau), aber zwei andere Sachen sind sicher: 1.) Geißgraben ist kein Name eines Baches, sondern eines Grabens (natural=valley). Der Bach heißt dann vielleicht(!) Geißgrabenbach. 2.) Bitte keine Fantasiegipfelnamen vergeben, sondern nur solche, die auch tatsächlich in der ansässigen Bevölkerung üblich oder wenigstens historisch belegt sind.