piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-10-27 20:24:23+00:00): Are you referring to the latest updates from the Southwest Calgary Ring Road project website (http://www.swcrrproject.com/) by Alberta Transportation and the project's private contractors?
boopington (2019-10-28 04:16:11+00:00): yes i am, plus any video renderings.
viloan (2019-10-17 00:57:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Ewen Hill (2019-10-19 05:45:33+00:00): Hi, I have just done the Munda BIddi and it definitely follows the cycle track to the east. The NW corner is probably one of the hardest walks on the ride and whilst the main road is an alternative, I believe the route should remain as it is sign posted as such
Ewen Hill (2019-10-19 05:55:29+00:00): sorry, that should be to the west of the sealed road.
steerage250 (2019-10-19 09:00:20+00:00): That's very interesting Ewan because I am part of a team re-working the section maps for each MBTF volunteer, and I was told it had been redirected down Scarp road (hence my edit).  When did you ride that section?  I'll have to go back and double-check with my source.
Ewen Hill (2019-10-19 09:21:30+00:00): Hi Steerage.   I rode it at the start of May and reported this section to the MB team along with the "summer route" where someone (DOC no doubt) stole the bridge south of Northcliffe. The far NW corner of Nth Dande Dam section was impassable probably due to trail bikes increasing the erosion (and the pea gravel). There was suppose to be an alternative from the southern most 90 degree corner to the northern exit onto Scarp Road but was signed no bikes.
   I have raised this question on the MB facebook page and most are reporting it is still signed but most are avoiding it due to the impossible nature of it when bike packing. You probably have more info than I do so don't revert it ATM, Thanks for your help with the MB. A bloody stupid however excellent idea I am glad to have done... ONCE!
steerage250 (2019-10-19 23:45:30+00:00): Ewen, I have reverted the change.  We were basing our route data in the first instance from the official DBCA GPX file on the government website (which is nearly 18 months old).  The original route was down Scarp Rd, so the alignment you rode must be "new-ish" (ie a change after the original alignment.  Based on your advice (and the fact someone has mapped it out to the west), I believe that more than the DBCA GPX file.
steerage250 (2019-10-19 23:46:51+00:00): I am also trying to maintain a more up-to-date GPX file of the whole route than the one on the government website.  You don't happen to have a GPX file encompassing this "new" alignment do you?
steerage250 (2019-10-19 23:49:51+00:00): How come you were notified of my change? I'm thinking that as part of the process of trying to maintain an up-to-date GPX of the whole trail, it would be good to know if anyone changed the Munda Biddi route relation.  Do you know if that is possible ?
Ewen Hill (2019-10-20 02:14:54+00:00): Steerage, 
   The deviation route I think is on the paper MB trail maps and I found that the Govt GPX is good but does not exactly align. I might ping you an email as it is complex in areas as the mine expands, die back is found and cool burn or bushfires take out sections or more often than not trail bike action renders sections impassable. I will check up on how to flag changes to the MB route automatically (I was fixing a minor Osmose error close by and noticed it). It would be worthwhile for a few to know about changes to both the MB and the Bib. Also have a look at the comments regarding this section at https://www.facebook.com/groups/454889594682923/?multi_permalinks=1300719646766576&notif_id=1571474604765847&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic regarding this section.
viloan (2019-10-17 01:27:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
StephaneP (2019-10-22 09:42:51+00:00): Hi!
Why did you remove some maxspeed tags on roundabout ? Like this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350200450

Stéphane
StephaneP (2019-10-22 09:43:52+00:00): BTW : There is no ref=* on roundabouts in France.
EvanE (2020-02-26 21:41:46+00:00): Please excuse my late answer. 
i remove the maxspeed=* on roundabouts if the are to small to allow the speed indicated by the maxspeed=*. 

EvanE
EvanE (2020-02-26 21:44:52+00:00): A ref=* is in germany also on the roundabout. 
I will think of this difference when editing in France. 

Thank you for this clarification.

EvanE
Adam Franco (2019-12-19 13:09:56+00:00): Hi @somebody1358, I'm interested in hearing what your reasoning is for upgrading these roadway to "motorway" classification? I've gone back and forth on this one myself as it is an over-built roadway that doesn't neatly fit into any categories based on its appearance and it is a bit of a roadway island.

While it has grade-separated interchanges, it mostly has one lane of traffic in either direction except for a very sort stretch. As well, it does not connect major population centers. The roadway character is what is referred to as a "Super Two", an expressway that is not fully up to multi-lane interstate standards of number and width of lanes or speeds.

Based on discussions in the Talk-US mailing list 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2019-December/019785.html
this section of roadway may warrant being demoted to primary as that is the connectivity role it provides, while adding additional tags to indicate its construction character.
Himké (2019-10-17 02:07:53+00:00): Overpass is not yet open to traffic in the other direction
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-10-17 03:28:45+00:00): That overpass is is open https://www.halifaxtoday.ca/local-news/new-highway-102103-ramp-and-overpass-will-open-on-monday-update-1743298
viloan (2019-10-17 02:26:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-09 08:37:57+00:00): What is the source for population of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676522134 ?
Allison P (2022-08-09 09:39:51+00:00): Check spelling of "cemetery" too.
Noetvs (2020-03-23 16:14:07+00:00): error in place Ajuchitlan del Progreso,Guerrero.Mexico
Trevor_1 (2020-03-23 16:24:09+00:00): Usted puede corregirlo si quiere. 
You can change it if you want.
Szekha (2019-10-17 03:03:53+00:00): Incorrect source, meant to type in:
IBGE Street Names; Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Bing
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-22 08:50:45+00:00): Hi, caoanh. I have adjusted the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/735381715
and
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/735381718) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 22:28:29+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10166427 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 22:31:28+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição 10166429
user_5359 (2019-10-17 06:35:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Thank you for discovering and deleting the SPAM. However, there is a place node there that I have restored (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/154318726/history)
freebeer (2019-10-20 11:19:49+00:00): hallo georg,

it looks as if you should have restored v3 of the node, as it presently has the name of some business, plus additional info that should not be part of the name.

i'll probably see if i can pull up v3 for you to get the name (printer?  odd) correct again.

ciao
WoodWoseWulf (2019-10-20 23:16:02+00:00): This shelter is already in a larger park, there's no need to tag this as a park as well :)
raskoln1k0v (2019-10-22 11:31:32+00:00): Oh I didn't realize that. No worries :)
iWowik (2019-10-17 09:17:55+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно ее сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы берете номера домов?
Смотритель (2019-10-18 05:41:02+00:00): Добрый день. 
Я много езжу по Республике, вижу, документирую. Иногда пользуюсь публичной кадастровой картой
iWowik (2019-10-18 19:59:52+00:00): Добрый вечер!
Но публичная кадастровая карта не является в OSM разрешенным источником
13475 адресов да неполных пять месяцев это много для "вижу и документирую" В среднем часа полтора в день при минуте на домик.

Поэтому полагаю, что вы лукавите, не "Иногда пользуюсь", а скорее "Достаточно часто пользуюсь"
user_5359 (2019-10-19 14:43:44+00:00): Hallo! Hydranten haben in der Regel keinen Namen (Schlüssel name) sondern eine Referenznummer (Schlüssel ref). Das scheint mir auch hier der Fall zu sein.
SD13 (2019-10-19 15:45:13+00:00): Hallo! Ich hatte eine Information (betreffend auf Feuerwehrgerätehäuser) dass die Referenz nicht länger als 5 Zeichen haben sollte.
Aber es ist richtig, die Felder sollten umgestellt werden.

Kann man dies auf einfache Weise mit JOSM tun?
user_5359 (2019-10-19 15:52:15+00:00): Eine solche Einschränkung kann es lokal für bestimmte Objekte geben (genauso wie Postleitzahlen in Deutschland fünfstellig sind), aber eine generelle Grenze gibt es ab 255 Zeichen (Datenbankbedingt).
Klar geht das mit JOSM, man braucht auch nicht einmal die Overpass-API dazu: Man kann wenn die (richtigen!) Objekte selektiert sind auch bei mehreren Werten, den Schlüssel überschreiben ohne den Wert bzw die Werte zu ändern. Am besten erstmal mit einer Handvoll Objekte ausprobieren. Bei Bedarf kann ich gerne helfen oder gar übernehmen.
SD13 (2019-10-20 18:43:06+00:00): Ich habe es mal mit dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75961919 umgestellt.
Darfst gerne nochmal drüber schauen, Danke!
Basstoelpel (2019-12-09 21:55:14+00:00): Is there any quality check in this project? Buildings are glued to power lines, are not square and are larger than aerial images.
user_5359 (2019-10-17 06:36:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
abakus_uploader (2019-10-17 22:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
flohoff (2019-10-17 10:33:38+00:00): Hi Lukas,
ich habe den changeset eben gesehen. Der Anbau sieht nicht so richtig Rechtwinkelig aus - Guck mal - Im ID gibt es Funktionen die eine Fläche/Outline automatisch rechtwinkelig macht. D.h. man zeichnet die grob und dann macht der automat den rest. Taste weiss ich gerade auswendig nicht.

Eine andere sache ist - Du willst ja im Anbau einen POI (Point of interest) eintragen. Der hat defakto im moment nur einen Name. 
Für mich passt das nicht ganz zusammen. building=retail wäre ja z.b. ein Supermarkt. WingTsun hört sich eher nach Kampfsport an.

Ich würde die ganzen tags auf einen Knoten packen. Das Gebäude mit einem building=commercial versehen und dann einen POI in das Gebäudeoutline zu legen.

Und dann such mal im Wiki nach Kampfsportschulen - das gibts bestimmt.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75813607
emvee (2019-10-17 07:32:36+00:00): Hallo Dick,

Bedankt voor het oplossen van de fouten na mijn updates in Zoetermeer, zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75801149

Ik denk dat er een fout bij is ingeslopen voor https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134398257/history, die heeft nu "oneway=yes" maar dat is volgens mij niet correct.

Groeten,

Martin.
dvdhoven (2019-10-17 08:12:41+00:00): Hallo Martin,

Bedankt. Ik was Ctrl+Z vergeten. Ik zet wegen vaak even op eenrichting om de tekenrichting te zien. Soms vergeet ik dan het terug te draaien.
Ik heb het aangepast

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Russ McD (2019-11-10 03:25:07+00:00): I fear the Chiang Mai map has now just become a battleground for the "highway status changers" ....
This poor little way (Way 136605132) was once part of the road that followed the river. Alaska Dave tagged it as unclassified many years ago and added to tag to stipulate it was not one way.

Then 6 months ago, a member of Kaart decided it needed to be a trunk_link.
A week later another Kaart member made it a secondary_link.
Another two days passed when a third Kaart member decided maybe after all it was unclassified.
That lasted a whole 2 weeks, but finally succumbed to another change by yet another Kaart member, and it became tertiary.
But it didn't stop there ... a month later, enter someone from The Grab team, who, not wanting to be outdone, decided it should be secondary ... and to crown it, added a one way tag, which the best of my knowledge, it is not (I'll check later).
Finally Grab had one last parting shot and changed it to a secondary_link, a month later.

Grab/Kaart - please take your indecisiveness elsewhere. Your efforts are becoming the laughing stock of the seasoned OSM community here.
Russ.
tux67 (2019-10-17 08:38:38+00:00): Der Zaun wird ja ein Meisterwerk ;-) Gibt's auch irgendwelche access rights an den Durchgängen?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75814043
reigi (2019-10-17 12:09:20+00:00): Danke tux67, leider keine Hinweise wer durch darf. Ich habe nur Schilder entdeckt, dass ein Betreten generell verboten ist. Warum es an manchen Stellen trotzdem Durchgänge gibt, erschliesst sich mir noch nicht. Warten wir es ab.
reigi (2019-10-18 13:58:26+00:00): Ich habe heute mit einem Anwohner sprechen können. Er meinte, dass die Durchgänge für das Wild sind. Ich warte aber noch mal ab, ehe ich alle Durchgänge mit access=privat tagge. Die Gatter und Tore habe ich alle schon so gekennzeichnet.
tux67 (2019-10-18 14:29:28+00:00): das ergibt Sinn access=wildschwein ;-)
Benny Goodman (2019-10-23 12:29:14+00:00): Please don't create unnecessary multipolygons like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10166595 .
Or are you still going to add some inner elements?
maraf24 (2019-10-29 23:38:18+00:00): "," -> "."
RajSarkar (2019-10-17 16:14:13+00:00): lul
Frans S (2020-01-03 13:59:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
A remark. When you map a bridge over a stream or river , always add a tag
Layer=+1 to that part of the highway where it crosses the waterway
This means that the bridge and the water are on different levels.  Run a validation on your work. I pops up instantly
Thanks
maro21 (2019-11-30 01:43:21+00:00): Co z tego że całość? Ujednoliciłem wszystkie SKP jako węzeł żeby było jednakowo. Czemu psujesz? I dlaczego usunąłeś adres?
maraf24 (2019-11-30 01:55:52+00:00): Klasyka. Znów "poprawiałeś" po mnie, a jak przywróciłem to co było poprzednio prawidłowo zrobione, to odwracasz kota ogonem.
Jak chcesz mieć POI tylko w punktach to proszę bardzo - załóż wątek na forum i przekonaj społeczność do takiego rozwiązania. 
I nie nazywaj swoich własnych, nieprzedyskutowanych zasad "ujednolicaniem".
Warin61 (2019-10-18 05:24:07+00:00): This realtion 10163446 crosses itself. See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.26210&lat=-36.20372&zoom=15
PulisakZ (2019-10-18 09:53:12+00:00): Thank you for noticing my unintended mistake. I fixed.
Alexey Vazhnov (2019-10-17 10:17:24+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Пожалуйста, делайте более подробное описание изменений. В данном случае, как я понимаю, вы в основном поправили расположение зданий и дорог под свежие спутниковые снимки.
lokotskov (2019-10-17 10:44:38+00:00): ок
Uralla (2019-10-18 03:44:30+00:00): Да, ценное замечание. Тоже грешу этим. :)
Alexey Vazhnov (2019-10-18 04:50:23+00:00): @Uralla, посмотрите, для примера, мои описания изменений, я стараюсь делать их понятными: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alexey%20Vazhnov/history
luiswoo (2019-10-17 19:38:07+00:00): вид спорта записывается в тег sport. sport=handball, "специализированный гандбольный зал Олимп" - это в описание.
Graf Westerholt (2023-09-30 10:33:23+00:00): AFAIK steht an dieser Stelle kein Briefkasten. Drei Meter weiter steht eine, welcher aber schon länger eingetragen ist. Warum hast du den Eintrag erstellt?
kmeyster (2023-09-30 18:54:26+00:00): sorry ...bitte ignorieren bzw löschen...war offenbar ein Fehler meinerseits
DD1GJ (2019-10-17 09:45:51+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Es empfiehlt sich, abgebrochene Häuser in den Lebenszyklus demolished:building zu ändern. Dies verhindert, dass ein Luftbild-Mapper die nun freie Fläche anhand eines veralteten Luftbildes wieder bebaut.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Viele Grüße, Joachim
OSM-Kreis-Viersen1 (2019-10-17 12:03:15+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
danke für deine Anmerkung.
Wir gucken uns das mal beim nächsten Abbruch an. 
Mfg Danijela
trigpoint (2019-10-17 11:41:45+00:00): Hi, what evidence do you have to suggest that this is no longer a track?

Cheers Phil
Velox (2019-10-21 13:08:02+00:00): Hi again. 

My edit was based on customer feedback and satellite imagery. It is clearly seen that this road is the only route to few houses/farmyards, so it is reasonable to assume that this road is used by regular cars. Tracks are not for everyday driving by car. So they are excluded for the normal car routing graph which is correct. Driveways to farmyards and houses are not tracks. They are not dominantly used for agricultural purposes. The amount of traffic for living outweighs by orders of magnitude. The postal services goes there, the kids go to school. Friends come and go. People drive to work. Tagging a driveway to a farm or to houses as an agricultural track makes them unreachable for most of today's car routing engines in their default settings.

Thank you!
Bytemark (2019-10-18 09:39:16+00:00): Hi Lakatos,

you've mapped many typical oxbow lakes here (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/735446739). Please tag them as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Doxbow .

Thank you very much!
LakatosVL (2019-10-18 11:38:29+00:00): Hi Bytemark,

Thanks for your comment!

We are mapping waterbodies as we have a aerial imagery, but we don't have a ground truth which lakes are oxbow by classification and which are not. Also we don't know exactly which lakes are intermittent and which are not.

We are doing a hard and time consuming work here to map polygons of all waterbodies that we can see, so locals can add appropriate tags. Together we can create the best map that exist on the market!

Thanks,
Vladimir
literan (2019-10-17 18:27:42+00:00): зачем второй раз импортите те же точки? откатываю.
maro21 (2020-02-28 23:50:52+00:00): Tag height=0.1 jest potrzebny do wizualizacji 3D i proszę go nie usuwać!
Tak wygląda budynek po twojej zmianie: https://i.postimg.cc/ydtS4sT4/0.png
maraf24 (2020-03-01 16:33:20+00:00): height=0.1 z obrysu z building= będę usuwał i proszę mnie nie namawiać do tagowania pod render.
maro21 (2020-03-01 23:32:33+00:00): Ja cię nie namawiam do tagowania pod render, tylko do niepsucia budynku w który włożono kilkanaście godzin pracy, tylko dlatego że ty nie używasz budynków 3D.
Mirasolera (2019-11-06 00:32:54+00:00): Hola Senor, usted hizo el error:-) Es el nuevo decreto de la mopc. Lea aca:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Carlos%20Brys/diary/390555. Yo lo voy a cambiar otravez. Gracias por tu colaboracion!
canfe (2019-10-17 13:35:04+00:00): Guarda che non è un parco.
Studia prima di mappare.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:leisure=playground
Paine15 (2019-10-23 11:53:20+00:00): Si chiama parco donatori di sangue nel sito del comune di Leinì e quindi l'ho mappato così
Gh0stz0x (2019-10-23 16:11:43+00:00): Per questioni legali non adrebbero presi dati da sorgenti che non siano i sopralluoghi o la conoscenza diretta...
canfe (2019-10-24 06:59:40+00:00): A me risulta un altro nome sul sito del Comune.
http://www.comune.leini.to.it/Home/Guida-al-paese?IDDettaglio=17282
Che poi ci sia una sede AVIS è altra cosa.
Confermi?
Paine15 (2019-10-24 07:16:29+00:00): C'è un parco giochi dove ho segnato io la sede AVIS non l'ho notata potrebbe però essere la struttura a fianco ma non penso di averla mai vista aperta (forse non l'ho semplicemente notata io)