piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2021-10-01 12:54:42+00:00): HighRouleur, 
see my PM to you about joining the mailing list.
HighRouleur (2021-10-02 00:03:28+00:00): Hi Tonyfi,
In relation your comment, there has been significant discussion in the Melbourne Bikepath cycling community recently relating to permissions about types of paths than can be ridden. 
Some members have also sought clarification from Vic Police on the rules. It has been made clear to the cycling community that unless there is specific signage to indicate that bikes are permitted, then bikes are not permitted. 
These updates are important as a lot of the software and apps that cyclist use for course routing takes the shortest or fastest routes which could include illegal paths such as footpaths etc. 
I hope that this clarifies your concern.
tonyf1 (2021-10-02 00:18:07+00:00): Hi HighRouleur. Thanks for further clarifying your understanding of the law. This is probably a discussion best held on the talk-au list rather than here, because of its complexity. You say "unless there is specific signage to indicate that bikes are permitted, then bikes are not permitted" Can you give more information on this? Was the advice verbal or written? Is there a URL that you can give? Then there is the issue of whether OSM should stick to ground verifiable facts and leave the interpretation of law to the routing software. Your readiness to engage in discussion is appreciated, thanks, but please do not do more mass retaggings till you have a consensus.
HighRouleur (2021-10-02 01:45:35+00:00): Thanks Tonyf1

I have just subscribed to talk-au however I haven’t seen further discussion or I’m not sure how to post as I’d be keen to resolve this.
Fizzie-DWG (2021-10-02 02:38:43+00:00): Hi. Simply send an e-mail to < talk-au@openstreetmap.org > with an appropriate title - "Cycling on Vic footpaths" would seem good! Replies will then appear in the list & you can then respond to them by clicking on the "Reply-All" button. Graeme
adamh (2021-10-02 08:59:29+00:00): There's archives of talk-au at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/
tonyf1 (2021-10-15 21:08:54+00:00): Reverted by Changeset: 112560047
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:03:46+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
topolusitania (2021-09-30 11:14:16+00:00): Olá. Bem vinda ao OpenStreetmap
 Por favor verifica as minhas correcções.  Removi ruas/estradas duplicadas e desenhei as casas individualmente, pois um terreno que contém uma casa não é uma casa na totalidade. Tenta não sobrepor os limites dos terrenos às estradas, para ser mais facil edições futuras. Bom trabalho
Rosa014 (2021-09-30 13:32:54+00:00): Obrigada =)
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:03:53+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-30 20:32:03+00:00): https://bip.um.wroc.pl/attachments/download/105375
﴿﴾‎ (2021-10-01 12:10:41+00:00): Why have you deleted the correctly tagged razed railway segment?
MxxCon (2021-10-01 13:50:51+00:00): Because OSM is supposed to represent real world the way it is NOW, not how it was in the past. Various lifecycle tags should be applied to recently changed features, not historical ones. Looking at various satellite imagery, this chunk of tracks is missing since AT LEAST 1994, that's almost 30 years ago, maybe even longer but I couldn't find older imagery for this area.
If you want to map this track segment, add it to openhistoricalmap or wikidata, but such old non-existing features shouldn't be on OSM.
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:03:59+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:04:08+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
Nordpfeil (2021-09-30 11:53:04+00:00): Can you please check the added key=value combination "Maritime=Centre" ?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-09-30 12:02:33+00:00): fixed error
Glassman (2021-09-30 20:04:04+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting a address, keep the address for when the local government reassigns it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111890777
felipeeugenio (2021-09-30 12:54:17+00:00): Hola Sergio. por favor cuidado con tus ediciones. O se te corrió el mouse o no tienes claridad del uso del tag building. Voy a intentar interpretar lo que intentaste hacer
Otra cosa: el Colegio San Francisco Javier se cambió de ahí hace varios. Siguen usando ese Gimnasio?
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 03:33:58+00:00): idem annulé changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111891202
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 03:32:37+00:00): idem : annulé changement
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111891659
imagico (2021-10-05 17:46:12+00:00): Be advised you have mapped an iceberg here.

And for mapping an island you would have needed to add the natural=coastline tag by the way - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline

You are very welcome to map in polar regions where much too little mapping takes place overall - but it is important to familiarize yourself with the geography of the region and the pitfalls of reading imagery from there - see also  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping.
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 03:25:09+00:00): changeset annulé comme les précédents
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111892038
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 03:23:55+00:00): modifications annulées comme sur précédents changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111892566
marczoutendijk (2021-09-30 18:56:27+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111930716
pika_sky (2021-09-30 09:58:22+00:00): taketaketakeさん，こんにちは。
この変更セットでハーバービュー通りがsecondary(一般県道)からtertiary(一般道)へと変更されていますが，今年4月1日に沖縄県道222号真地泉崎線の一部としてこの通りが路線指定されました。
つきましては，この道路をsecondaryに戻していただけないでしょうか？
pika_sky (2021-09-30 10:10:42+00:00): taketaketakeさん，こんにちは。
この編集セットで県庁前通りのrefが42;221から42に変更されていますが，令和3年4月1日に沖縄県道221号那覇内環状線の路線変更があり，この区間が沖縄県道42号線との重複区間となりました。
つきましては，refを42;221に戻していただけないでしょうか？
Glassman (2021-09-30 20:12:00+00:00): #TIP: upload your edit before moving to a distant location. 

The fords you added look correct. It's just a node with a tag where the road and stream cross. . 

Question about the western Middle Trail. You added a description tag Decommissioned. Does that mean people shouldn't be using it? If so I'd mark it with an access=no. 

It's also tagged as a path, which is just a trail. Yet you show motor_vehicle access as yes. .

Can you review this section? Let me know if you need help. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111893260
Greg_Rose (2022-05-11 06:26:24+00:00): @Glassman The mapper was trying to mark the trail as ATV-permitted. I'm fixing right now. The fords were duplicated many times as well.
Ser9ei (2021-10-01 00:36:01+00:00): Не стоит добавлять теги bicycle=yes на тротуары и oneway=no на дороги без одностороннего движения, так как это подразумевается по умолчанию и эти теги не несут никакой смысловой нагрузки, а лишь увеличивают объём БД. Перед внесением правок можно проконсультироваться в чате ТГ OpenStreetMap RU. Чем раньше начнёте спрашивать или читать wiki, тем меньше потом придётся исправлять и откатывать свои правки.
OddlyAngled (2021-09-30 15:09:37+00:00): are you sure there is a hospital here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111893505
marczoutendijk (2021-09-30 18:55:15+00:00): Reverted by DWG:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111930678
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Frans S (2021-09-30 15:32:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping. Square buildings,
Be sure an object is a building. (Check shadow next to it(

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111894345
nevw (2021-09-30 06:11:12+00:00): Hi
please don't add the name=* to the houses. You have already added addr:housenumber and addr:street to OSM.
Names are only added to things that have names such as a street name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
nevw (2021-10-01 07:29:24+00:00): no response from mapper and have now deleted the names from the houses.
fabiotofy (2021-10-01 07:19:07+00:00): Ciao, CTR 1:25000 e 1:5000 parlano di Bosco Bazzoni.  In linea sullo stesso pensiero anche la tabacco nr. 47. Coronella da dove viene fuori ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111896208
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-01 07:38:42+00:00): Avevo sbagliato tag. Andava messo il loc_name però confermo che fa parte fi bosco bazzoni
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:08:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9106694080/history has access:hgv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?
LemonEarlMapper (2024-02-29 17:56:03+00:00): Hello, I saw that you commented on my colleague LakeVelence’s changeset. They are no longer active so I will be handling this on their behalf. The OSM wiki indicates that using access:hgv=* is outdated, with alternatives like hgv:conditional=* now preferred since this edit was made. You are welcome to update this old access=hgv tagging as you see fit. Thank you for your contributions and Happy Mapping!
TheSwavu (2022-02-12 05:39:40+00:00): Hi, 

Based on Strava I've marked a number of tracks around here as removed:highway=cycleway.

Would you please check to see if you agree.

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2022-02-12 05:40:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117310122
hatul (2021-10-12 18:49:36+00:00): תודה על התיקון.
כשמשנים צבע של שביל צריך לשנות גם את הסימון ביחס שלו בהתאם. הפעם אני שיניתי.
osmc:symbol=green:white:green_stripe
emvee (2021-11-06 21:42:34+00:00): Hi,

After you adding the cycle lanes, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112988036 added bicycle=no to some of these ways, see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=16390&item=3032&class=30329

As you are knowledge in here it seems can you have a look at these two roads and correct things?

Thanks!
nevw (2021-11-07 03:29:31+00:00): Thanks for that-all fixed now as far as I can spot.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-09-30 08:39:37+00:00): What is the reasoning for removing the unmarked crossing tags? By design they are a crossing and they are unmarked, so I am confused as to why you have done this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111897911
Aalbers69 (2021-10-08 09:51:39+00:00): Scott - I may not be right, but there seems to be more locations where they are not tagged then where they are (and the editing defaults to not tagging them). Changed them for consistency, but happy to be corrected and assist in tagging all the non conforming points.
Colbertson (2023-05-11 19:53:50+00:00): Čau.
No kurienes ņemti ref= ceļiem?
Piemēram https://www.osm.org/way/988201271
Ja tie ir no kādas iekšējās datubāzes nav jēgas tos paturēt OSM.
DP24PH (2021-09-30 14:31:18+00:00): Unfortunately, toll booths are not yet verified as of this moment. In the meantime, kindly refrain from adding toll booths unless verified.
kartonage (2021-10-01 07:29:08+00:00): Hej,

you have still not answered and continue to map bad buildings.
Please respond.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13478049

Привет,

вы все еще не ответили и продолжаете наносить на карту плохие здания.
Пожалуйста, ответь.
em1nk (2021-09-30 06:41:08+00:00): Elinize sağlık, 15 Temmuz Mahallesini ben de eklemeyi düşünüyordum, unutmuşum. 😅
Le Pasta (2021-09-30 06:19:22+00:00): *Edit Primary road I mean
Jakka (2021-09-30 13:19:33+00:00): De originelestraat naam mag je niet vervangen voor een defintie van weg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet
 bicycle=designated, overtaking:motor_vehicle=no, maxspeed=30, cyclestreet=yes
Jakka (2021-09-30 13:21:23+00:00): je had er een extra weg boven op getekend. nooit goed routpanners vinden nooit de correcte weg. Heb deze alvast verwijderd. Dus enkel je fietstraat def toevoegen
SekeRob (2021-09-30 06:38:50+00:00): As can be seen above, resolved 5 Osmose issues!
Woazboat (2021-10-29 22:25:47+00:00): Hi,
Du hast hier die Fußgängerzone von einigen Plätzen entfernt. place=square ist nicht gleichbedeutend und kein Ersatz sondern nur eine Ergänzung, d.h. highway=pedestrian + area=yes sollte nicht entfernt werden.

lg, Woazboat
Woazboat (2021-10-29 22:32:14+00:00): Gleiches gilt für man_made=courtyard 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85081255/history
aceman444 (2022-02-12 18:40:00+00:00): No kvalitny popis sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Good_changeset_comments .

A aky je zdroj dat?
Владимир К (2021-12-05 17:33:44+00:00): Добрый день!
Зачем вы добавили все эти теги?
Владимир К (2021-12-05 17:34:02+00:00): там стоят какие-то знаки?
DeFra85 (2021-10-08 15:26:56+00:00): Sorry, but you are wrong. We discussed this problem a few weeks ago in the different changesets (look at the history of the "tagging-war") and in the forum "osm@gt.owl.de"

Summary:
A general access=no is nessecary, because bicycleroads can't be distinguished from normal roads right now. So if someone doesn't use routing and just looks at the map while driving, many won't recognize and just try to use the blocked road. Ergo: more traffic jams there. 
If acces=no is used, the graphic of the street changes and users maybe recognise.
Frans S (2021-09-30 14:53:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111902623
Frans S (2021-09-30 14:52:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111902749
Glassman (2021-09-30 20:16:54+00:00): #TIP: We don't add personal information to OSM. I removed the name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111903267
Zaneo (2021-09-30 13:46:17+00:00): This is a lot of changes were they all verified?
SekeRob (2021-09-30 18:36:54+00:00): Sorry guy, they are in serious incommunicado and if you take the effort to approach them via their one and only 'official' channel you're in uphill mode.
Lee Carré (2021-10-09 19:10:46+00:00): “take the effort to approach them via their one and only 'official' channel”

Shouting into the wind.

This account is tolerated, at best, because of the nature of changes made.

I suppose the alternative is many frequent changesets (like a certain bot concerned with doing s/http:/https:/ ).

Perhaps a programmer could see if they have a source-code repository, somewhere, for a patch to be applied.
Lee Carré (2021-10-09 20:54:31+00:00): Seems that the developers already know: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-classic/issues/29
Lee Carré (2021-10-25 19:18:31+00:00): Since the wheelmap-classic repo has since been retired, I opened an issue in the (current) wheelmap-frontend repo: http://www.github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/327
holgerd (2022-06-09 19:17:53+00:00): Hi, I’m the co-founder of Wheelmap and responsible for this. Firstly, on behalf of the whole Wheelmap project: Our apologies, we strive to be good OSM community members!

We are aware that large changesets are a problem and working on fixing it. Please find our plans and the status here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329

The reason we did not reply earlier is, that I made one embarrassing mistake: The “wheelmap_visitor” user profile had an outdated e-mail address, so I did not get notifications and I did not notice this. I fixed it now and made sure all changeset comments in the future will be answered by me or our community management team.
gabro00 (2021-09-30 11:18:42+00:00): Úgy látom ezt nem is lehet felvinni, mert nincs szabály egy hónap első x munkanapjának jelölésére.
Persze itt még az is kellene, hogy az x+1 munkanaptól az utolsóig az adott hónapban, minden hónapra...
gabro00 (2021-09-30 11:35:15+00:00): Áh mégis, nem szép, de működik.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111912681
Valkai_S (2021-09-30 12:47:47+00:00): Köszi, szépen. Nekem csak egy hosszabb jutott eszembe: megadni, alapnak a 20-a utáni nyitvatartást, aztán felsorolni a 12 hónap 1-7 dátumát és arra módosítani az ide vonatkozó hosszabb nyitvatartás (korábbi kezdést, későbbi zárást (vagy fordítva, az 1-7 az alap és ezt módosítjuk a 8-hónap végéig) de az sehogy se úszható meg, hogy a hónapokat fel kelljen sorolni). Nem találtam én sem olyan lehetőséget, hogy adott, havonta ismétlődő  dátumra lehessen megadni nyitvatartási időt. 
Egyébként,  a buszállomás jegypénztára is így van nyitva, oda is bemásolható:
https://www.volanbusz.hu/hu/jegy-es-berlet/szemelyes-vasarlas/allomasok-es-penztarak/info/155
Valkai_S (2021-09-30 12:49:16+00:00): Bocs, úgy értettem, a 7-e utáni és nem a 20-a utáni :)
gabro00 (2021-09-30 13:33:58+00:00): Köszi, felvettem azt is
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111918143
Herman Lee (2021-10-01 15:55:47+00:00): I reverted this changeset for using 
proposing things as constructed things. See changeset 111970371(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111970371).
这个修改集因引入规划道路作为已建成道路而被退掉，详见修改集111970371（https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111970371）。
Lee Carré (2021-10-01 10:22:54+00:00): You surveyed each of these?
gmb9343 (2021-10-01 11:31:45+00:00): Yes
Lee Carré (2021-10-01 11:57:10+00:00): Very well.

Would it then be possible to upload your quest-answers more frequently, to avoid continent-sized bounding boxes (which notifies everyone within them)?
gmb9343 (2021-10-01 15:33:16+00:00): Yes. Apologies, I was working with the StreetComplete app and it appears to have combined some Quests together.
ftcat (2021-09-30 10:00:15+00:00): Hi Uli,
way 988251417 and way 988251418 are not buildings, rather undeveloped plots with a wall around.
Vinber-Pro (2021-10-06 07:17:50+00:00): Salut Jérémy,
super ces 2 containers de tri !

cela peut devenir un joli toc !

2 trucs qui apparraissent en ce moment c'est pour les livres aussi, soit les microbibliothèques, soit des containers pour récupérer les livres (type Le libre vert par exemple).

Oui je tente d'alimenter ton TOC !
à plus
mabrook_tc (2021-09-30 08:55:40+00:00): شركة مبروك للتجهيزات الفندقية
SomeoneElse (2021-10-02 13:35:02+00:00): Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111689713 , please remember to type in a comment...
SomeoneElse (2021-10-02 13:35:35+00:00): Seguendo https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111689713 , ricordati di digitare un commento...
maro21 (2021-09-30 19:28:29+00:00): Cześć, w przypadku zamkniętej drogi trzeba dać highway=construction + construction=kategoria_drogi + access=no + opening_date=2021-12-30, żeby wszystkie nawigacje poprawnie widziały takie zamknięcie.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-30 09:21:02+00:00): Hallo schrödingerkatze,

willkommen bei OSM!

Privat wäre access=private. Wie sieht denn die Sperrung aus? Gibt es Schranken/Tore/Schilder?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
vulasala (2021-10-01 06:27:48+00:00): Hi wannakorn,
Trust you are doing well. I have added classification to the way 25714943 which is untagged.
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111905602
habi (2024-11-04 08:53:38+00:00): Ich habe die Links wieder entfernt, da die Bilder nicht mehr existieren

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158730693
Jakka (2021-09-30 13:12:10+00:00): Je verwijderde een gebouw om deze erna terug in te tekenen.
Waardoor de data verloren ging. Of was deze niet meer correct ?
building	dormitory	
building:levels	5	
name	Vesuvius	
operator	KU Leuven
Je hebt nu de definiete van universiteit school gebouw van gemaakt ?
canfe (2022-06-17 06:56:39+00:00): horse non indica la percorribilità ma il permesso di poterlo fare.
Dato che di default le track sono anche per i cavalli il dato è ridondante (anche se ID lo propone, non va messo tutto quel che propone)
351293 (2021-10-15 15:44:56+00:00): Hallo, Du hast motor_vehicle=private entfernt. Wurde Zeichen 250 und die nördliche Barriere etwa schon entfernt?
LG