piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stretch Longfellow (2018-11-02 16:11:52+00:00): This was reduced to tertiary based on NDOT standards and usage.  I'm curious as to your reason for reversion.
frosm (2018-10-27 02:42:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
qu'est-ce que c'est Wood&co au milieu de la route ?
assenizator9 (2018-10-27 12:52:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Anisa IRM-ED (2020-10-23 08:49:28+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the secondary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638392802) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
assenizator9 (2018-10-27 13:00:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-14 11:18:39+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the secondary road and added bridge based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638401238
bob3bob3 (2023-02-16 09:53:34+00:00): Hi Ewen, re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3404662288 I was there today. The area is signed as huge rest area. (A few days for Mapillary data) and part covered with newish gravel and some dumped rubbish/junk. Could not see siding. The school however has had a sign erected on CEH pointing east up Kamarl Rd. I only followed it for about 200m seeing nothing obvious.
mueschel (2018-11-07 11:56:55+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange tag 'maxspeed:MA:urban'.

Jan
johnparis (2018-11-08 07:45:32+00:00): Thanks. That was an early effort to reconcile the Mapillary Street Signs. I removed it, though I kind of doubt that the real speed limit is 80 in the open areas.
johnparis (2018-11-08 07:47:48+00:00): The 80 was from a photo of an oil tanker. The real limit appears to be 60, at least in the urban areas.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-08 10:58:17+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638421807) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
sai_sri (2018-11-06 13:38:27+00:00): Hi angys,

As per osm wiki, a highway is tagged as unclassified if road is Public access and non-residential.
 In general,  unclassified is of lower priority  than tertiary and non-residential.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified. 
but in this scenario way 314089687,way 314089690,way 314089701,way 314089676,way 637925782,way 314089684 roads are leading to residential buildings. Hence the classification should be residential and not unclassified. Please suggest otherwise.

Thanks,
sai_sri.
angys (2018-11-06 13:43:17+00:00): Thank you for your information, will discuss later with other mappers.
sai_sri (2018-12-12 13:45:13+00:00): Hi angys,

Any update on this ?

Thank you,
sai_sri
angys (2018-12-12 14:31:10+00:00): Oh I forget, you may open discuss at OSM Malaysia community forun here. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=60
For me I preffer use residential for “Taman” road or village road that have name e.g. “Jalan Kampung Pisang” Because some of the village roads are very narrow and only motorcyvle can use it. Instead of unclassified, I use alley now for Taman neigbourhood backstreet and narrow village roads thank you.
mavl (2018-10-27 08:05:57+00:00): Здравствуйте, mapmsp.  
  
Этот пакет правок добавляет для здания наименование "Нежилое здание". В действительности это не название здания, а использование здания. Использование зданий в OpenStreetMap указывается с помощью тегов, а не с помощью названий. Например, гараж обозначается building=garage.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building  
  
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте подобные описания в качестве названий. И не удаляйте, пожалуйста, со зданий теги building, как, например, вы это сделали в пакете правок  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63919279  
  
Удаление тегов building со зданий является деградацией данных.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:12:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:12:00+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Volker Fröhlich (2018-10-27 09:13:23+00:00): Are you sure that "Mexican Food" is actually a name? I think you should rather remove the name and make that "cuisine=mexican". Please see:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
abakus_uploader (2018-10-27 22:42:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Negreheb (2018-11-21 15:03:34+00:00): Hallo addresshistory,

da sind dir leider wieder einige Hausnummern offensichtlich neben das Gebäude gerutscht.

Zum Beispiel in der Johannessiedlung. In Pfeiffenschlag sind ein paar Nummern auch voll neben den Gebäuden. In Drösiedl ist eine Doppel-Adresse ohne erkennbaren Mehrwert, in Pfaffenschlag und Artolz ebenfalls. In Buchenbach dann wieder Adressen neben den Gebäuden. 

Wäre gut, wenn du das vervollständigst und die Adressen richtig platzierst. :)

Lg
user_1470980 (2018-11-21 15:09:31+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich bin gerade in Osttirol mit Qualitätssicherungsarbeiten beschäftigt, bald gehts in der von Dir beschriebenen Region wieder weiter. Nachdem fu die Fehler bereits lokalisiert hast wäre es freundlich wenn du mir diese per Mail übermitteln könntest, gemainsam machen wir psm besser.
Jesper Henriksen (2018-11-21 16:20:01+00:00): Ser at noen av nodene som ble flyttet var med i ways som nå har blitt noe skjeve:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5827905818
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5823301653
NKA (2018-11-21 18:38:43+00:00): Hm, jeg har nok glemt å legge til "<;" i overpass-nedlastningen for å hente tilknyttede objekter.
nevw (2018-10-28 05:06:20+00:00): Josm simplify (2m) applied to streams.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-15 06:04:11+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the primary road based on Maxar Premium Imagery. 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638448274
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-15 06:04:08+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the primary roads based on Maxar Premium Imagery. 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638449065
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638449063
eggie (2018-10-27 07:46:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-27 07:50:49+00:00): Alleen name=  ... is niet voldoende. Kijk in de wiki wat bij een kunstwerk nog meer hoort. 
tourism=artwork
met evt. aanvullingen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork
armasari (2020-10-21 05:15:59+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the secondary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638450022) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
aixbrick (2018-10-27 10:46:21+00:00): Danke!
TG-map4 (2018-10-27 09:27:29+00:00): Hallo, du hast das Freilichtmuseum mitten im Feld an der Straße erstellt, also an falscher Stelle. Außerdem existierte es selbstverständlich schon, wurde es dir in der App nicht angezeigt? Bitte immer alle Zoomstufen durchprobieren, je nachdem wird es mal und mal nicht angezeigt. Ich habe deine Eintragung wieder gelöscht.
glibbertorsten (2018-10-28 07:52:15+00:00): Kriegst du nicht auch die Fehlermeldung in JOSM, weil du immer dengleichen Beschreibungstext "POI-Korrektur, -ergänzung" nimmst? Ich wäre dir dankbar, einen spezifischen Text zu hinterlegen, zumal du ja pro changeset immer nur ein Thema behandelst. Danke
Luzandro (2018-10-27 07:46:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1547517
HubMiner (2022-03-16 22:10:04+00:00): Hi, the opening_hours are unclear, could you update?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6017258720/history
Ger Walsh (2022-03-17 00:11:46+00:00): Ah, I can see my mistake I think, but have to find a good source.
eggie (2018-10-27 08:29:06+00:00): Dag macweekers,  Gebouwen worden in OSM niet zelf ingetekend, maar geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.

Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het Kadaster doorgeven middels het potloodje. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=klein%20welsden%2029&resultOffset=0&objectId=1903100936101825&geometry.x=183626.25140052&geometry.y=315884.2275982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1903100936101825

Verzoeken om import loepn via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
flohoff (2018-10-27 17:04:03+00:00): Moin,
mir ist gerade dieser hier gemeldet worden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278778564

Da ist nen maxspeed + maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward drauf - Das kann so nicht stimmen. Kann mir vorstellen das StreetComplete "kaputt" gemacht hat.

Flo
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-07 09:41:13+00:00): Hi, Trường Lâm. I have adjusted the secondary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/638458864) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Schienennagelhammerträger (2018-10-28 00:32:31+00:00): Nich'n büsch'n voreilig gewesen mit dem "Abriss" der Halle etc.? Do. geschlossen, heute schon alles plattgewalzt?
Schakaline Anubis (2018-10-28 00:54:08+00:00): Da wird schon seit mehreren Monaten gebaut - https://nord24.de/bremerhaven/baustart-fuer-neuen-edeka-in-bremerhaven
diskmanti (2018-10-30 09:46:29+00:00): te lutem te shtosh atributet e tjera ne lidhje me kameren
diskmanti (2018-10-30 09:47:04+00:00): te lutem te shtosh atributet e tjer ne lidhje me kameren
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zstadler (2018-11-06 08:37:47+00:00): Hello Flayer,

Military training areas have legal implications in Israel.
In this edit you have removed the military training area tags, which can be dangerous to people.

What is the reason and source for this change?

Because of the severe safety implications of this change, I'll revert this change until it is clear that is not a military training area any more.
Flayer (2018-11-06 11:16:02+00:00): I live in Israel for more than 25 years, and id you care about safety you should never mark civilian highways as military training area.

It is clear for anyone who lives here and to anyone who can use google maps and street view that Palmachim Air Forse base is to the west of highway #4.
zstadler (2018-11-06 14:08:55+00:00): This is not mapping of the base. 
.
This is the training area, as provided by the IDF.
.
Please also see https://goo.gl/234Hn7 for the official boundaries on govmap.gov.il
Flayer (2018-11-06 14:17:56+00:00): Training area does not include neither road #4 nor road #4111 regardless of gov.map.il.

The are dozens of mistakes and obsolete data in the "official boundaries" of gov.map.il even in the small town I live in, moreover in the entire country.

For security reasons you can't mark a highway as military training ground. Thousands of civilian vehicles pass through every hour, it is dangerous to people to tell them to find another way through urban zones of Yavne.

Besides, OSM is not a mirror for various "official boundaries" and doesn't have to reflect errors in other maps.
zstadler (2018-11-06 16:08:14+00:00): I do not understand if you claim that the boundaries of the training area outside the air-force base are incorrect, or that there is no such training area.
Flayer (2018-11-06 16:14:42+00:00): I claim the there is no training area on the highway. I also claim that even if there is a taining area between Palmachin airbase and the highway (i.e to west of the highway), such training area does not extend to the eastern side of the highway.

And waht is your claim? That Dolev street in Yavne is more dangerous than Hatzav street, because Dolev street lays inside a training area?
zstadler (2018-11-06 16:42:55+00:00): I agree that the IDF data has issues. I have corrected such error myself.
.
I claim that there is a training area there. The de-facto eastern boundary may be different than the IDF data.
.
You may wish to correct such an error by mapping the actual boundary. On the other side, removing the training_area tagging is incorrect and degrades the correctness of the map.
Flayer (2018-11-06 16:50:59+00:00): I could move the boundary of the polygon you've created somewhere to the west of the highway, but I'm not even sure it exists. Let's asume it is. 
Though placing a training_area tagging over some purely civilian roads, houses and kindergarten surely degrades the correctness of the map. This is what you did there. So don't expect other people to correct those obvious mistakes precisely. Just avoid them in first place.
zstadler (2018-11-06 17:04:11+00:00): I appreciate the sensible approach you took in changeset 64231886. I ask that when you find the next error, please correct it rather than remove the area. At the end of the day, we all want OSM to be the best mapping source in Israel
.
Importing the IDF data, with its errors, has a significant value for OSM users and hikers in particular. As you probably know, Civilians are required to get IDF authorization prior to entering its training areas. Until this import there was no free source for this mapping information. See the discussion at the OSM Israel forum - 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61570
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
toyotagps (2018-10-28 04:39:22+00:00): Добрый день. Зачем Вы убрали construction с дорог которые еще закрыты?
WoesteHugo (2018-10-27 09:29:40+00:00): Bovenstaande comment klopt niet. Die was bedoeld voor een ander gebied...whoops
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:11:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
R0bst3r (2018-10-29 08:03:01+00:00): Hallo Captain_P,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Ich hätte hier allerdings für access den Wert customers verwendet.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63923405
Captain_P (2018-10-29 17:13:58+00:00): Dazu musst Du wissen. Das Gebäude und den Parkplatz hat die Gemeinde Essingen gebaut und der REWE und Bäcker sind nur Mieter.
Auf dem Parkplatz parken auch Anwohner und wenn ein Reisebus eine zweitägige Reise mit vorwiegend Renter macht, parken diese auch dort und die Abreise ist von dort. Also reiner Kundenparkplatz st es nicht. 
Kann man aber lassen, soll ja kein Zirkus dort überwintern ;-)
R0bst3r (2018-10-29 17:51:48+00:00): OK, danke für den Hinweis. Das wusste ich tatsächlich nicht.
Semaa1 (2018-10-27 09:50:31+00:00): вчера правил всё нормально было. сегодня бардак переезды там где нет. Н кольцо выезд совсем пропал
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
VictorIE (2019-03-29 04:54:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8850364

denomination=anf

Should this be denomination=anglican?

Church seems to be Roman Catholic tridentine now.
abakus_uploader (2018-10-27 22:42:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
R0bst3r (2018-10-29 08:12:00+00:00): Hallo Captain_P,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Auch hier als kleiner Tipp: Amenity und building schließen sich nicht aus. Ohne Building wird aber das Gebäude nicht mehr als solches auf der Karte angezeigt. Zudem war die Rappelkiste jetzt doppelt erfasst, als node und am Gebäude, ich habe alles auf das Gebäude übertragen.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63923782
viloan (2018-10-27 10:12:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-27 12:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63926599 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some rubbish around null island
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-27 12:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63926599 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some rubbish around null island
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-27 12:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63926599 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some rubbish around null island
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
richlv (2018-10-27 16:22:24+00:00): Hi there and thank you for the improvements to OSM.
This changeset added building=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132364752 . From the imagery it is obvious that this whole area is not a building, so I have removed this tag.
Could you please check whether you have added building=yes to similar ways, and if so, remove it?
Thank you and happy mapping :)
glye (2023-02-13 11:10:40+00:00): Hi! About the old railway between Porsgrunn and Larvik. Given the OSM decision not to render "railway / abandoned" in the main layer anymore, while the presence of the railbed is important information for anyone walking / biking in this area, possibly even emergency services.

Do you think it makes sense to duplicate the line, and make the copy a Path? Then it would be rendered as what it actually is now. And we could tag it to make it clear it's rough, but walkable/bikeable with the right equipment. While the original railway line would remain as is, without messing with the tags for that, for those interested in the railway history.

I have just started exploring it, both from the Porsgrunn and Larvik sides. I plan to do more of that once the snow melts some more.