piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KartoGrapHiti (2021-12-22 10:19:26+00:00): Danke für die Behebung des Fehlers.
Frans S (2022-01-12 09:26:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115246357
mavl (2021-12-23 12:29:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет такие названия дорог, как "на кладбище", "на скотомогильник Скородум" и прочие. С точки зрения OpenStreetMap это не названия и добавлять их не нужно. Можно сказать, что это описания дорог.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Murcik (2021-12-25 07:59:52+00:00): описание дорог надо писать в описании (description)
eggie (2021-12-22 10:46:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-22 10:53:46+00:00): Fietsknooppunt 05 ligt nu wel heel wonderlijk.. 

Dit is de situatie oktober 2021. Zijn die nieuwe straten werkelijk al gereed of is het nog highway=construction ?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 10:59:15+00:00): https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=22-12-2020&loc=53.18098%2C5.547768%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-10-04&acqid=20211004_114013_SV1-02&sensor=SuperView-1
Dimacn (2021-12-23 07:13:10+00:00): Зачем вы удалили реальную геометрию здания и изменили мультиполигон? Ваша вандальные изменения отменены.
Carto'Cité (2023-07-15 17:56:15+00:00): Bonjour Flrbrmd,

Je me permets de te contacter au sujet de ce double sens cyclable :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289229200
Tu avais bien ajouté cycleway:left=opposite_lane mais tu avais ajouté oneway:bicycle=yes ce qui est contradictoire. Je l'ai corrigé en oneway:bicycle=no . C'est probablement une erreur ponctuelle mais au cas où je te contacte pour te prévenir 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité
Eiim (2021-12-22 14:14:25+00:00): This is incorrect, the road was cut off around a year or two ago due to the construction zone to the north.
KVI0n (2021-12-22 14:40:06+00:00): Hi!
Thank you. I have returned my edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115258535                                    I'll be more careful next time.               Best regards. Liliya
Eiim (2021-12-23 02:53:26+00:00): Great, thanks for the quick fix!
NunoCaldiera (2021-12-22 17:52:56+00:00): Hi Kerguelen2, Did you find anything wrong with the existing name?  
Don't modify the names that are added based on the local survey.
Kerguelen2 (2021-12-22 22:39:57+00:00): Hi NunoCaldiera. There is a large park sign seen in ground imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-16.334529876709&lng=-48.941867828369&z=17&pKey=1122462154909025&focus=photo&x=0.35659093794901564&y=0.5229257101576643&zoom=0.5164171765734266) that reads "Parque Ambiental Ipiranga”. 
I changed the name with that resource and cited 'Mapillary' as one of my sources in this changeset. Have a good day.
Структурное подразделение "Детский сад № 7 комбинированного вида" (2021-12-22 11:22:59+00:00): Образование и воспитание детей от 1,5 до 7 лет
Murcik (2021-12-25 08:02:56+00:00): Занес это в тег пояснение description
Dimacn (2021-12-25 12:25:10+00:00): Также, есть специальные теги для возраста: min_age и max_age - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:max_age
MarcoR (2021-12-23 09:14:46+00:00): Ciao!
Ho controllato il gruppo di modifiche e non ho trovato alcun errore.

Buone feste,
Marco.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115251169
JesseFTW (2022-01-21 04:17:30+00:00): Thanks for all your work, but I think you gave this the wrong changeset comment. It's actually in Dutton, in Canada, not in Woods Hole. :-)
mariotomo (2021-12-25 02:02:13+00:00): hi new mapper! welcome to OSM. as you can see, iD warned you with this one: warnings:suspicious_name:generic_name
this is related to naming a building "building".  so many people call their dog "Fido", but not "dog".
highflyer74 (2021-12-22 12:35:01+00:00): Moin!

Sollte es so sein, dass hier Seamarks in der Nordsee UND Westafrika bearbeitet wurden, oder war das ein Versehen?

Viele Grüße!
Daham (2021-12-22 12:42:27+00:00): Oops,
danke für den Hinweis. Da ist aus 53°N leider 3°N geworden.
Wird korrigiert.
highflyer74 (2021-12-22 12:45:22+00:00): Kein Problem :-) Schönen Tag Dir!
Isolator (2021-12-22 13:09:48+00:00): Der obige Text ist teiweise ein Copy/Paste Fehler, korrekt muss es heißen:
Spielplatz eingezeichnet.
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 09:56:57+00:00): Hey, du hast hier einen Placenode positioniert, bei "zusammengesetzten Gemeinden" ist das aber "falsch", da es dafür die Grenzrelationen gibt...
Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place?uselang=de
"Ein "place" für Siedlungen sollte immer platziert werden, wo sich auch tatsächlich eine Siedlung befindet. Das heißt insbesondere, dass für fusionierte Gemeinden und Samtgemeinden kein eigener "place" gegeben ist, der z.B. im geographischen Zentrum platziert wäre. Für diesen Zweck sind allein die Grenzrelationen bestimmt. "
Hb- (2026-04-06 20:58:26+00:00): Samtgemeinden brauchen auch einen place-tag, damit die Adresssuche funktioniert: 
https://osmand.net/docs/technical/algorithms/trace-address-search-issues/#how-osmand-identifies-city-boundaries
Hb- (2026-04-07 01:42:19+00:00): Derzeit findet OsmAnd bei der Adresssuche den Ort "Oberharz" überhaupt nicht. Wahrscheinlich weil label= und admin_centre=Elbingerode  Elemente von relation/1352954 waren. Hab ich eben entfernt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
EMREOYUN (2021-12-22 13:14:57+00:00): These are line names, not lamps. Sorry about wrong description.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
ivanbranco (2021-12-23 15:08:04+00:00): You added Porto=Club, was supposed to be name=Porto Club?
Fijord (2021-12-23 15:12:32+00:00): Ist nicht mehr vorhanden.
user_13980615 (2021-12-22 13:25:38+00:00): 我对位置属性的编辑不太熟悉，多谢你帮忙改正和指点！
Nonexhudlix (2022-03-30 05:40:53+00:00): Die K1904 in Richtung Großaspach ist *nicht* durchgängig auf 70 beschränkt. Du hast die bestehenden Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen überschrieben, bitte korrigiere das wieder.
eggie (2021-12-22 13:45:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Wanneer er paaltjes staan (Aan welke kant staan die)  kun je op een node barrier=bollard taggen. 
Dat houdt dan autoverkeer tegen.
Wanneer brommers mogen passeren dan miped=yes en mofa=yes toevoegen aan het paaltje.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-22 13:54:58+00:00): Het paaltje met bovenstaande tags heb ik even toegevoegd aan de noordzijde van de brug. 
.. motor_vehicle=no heb ik van het wegdeel verwijderd. Welk bord staat hier? 
Zal nog wel eens kijken waar het paaltje precies staat. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 13:57:51+00:00): moped en mofa = yes toegevoegd op het paaltje
eggie (2022-03-25 19:11:18+00:00): Andere paaltje ook toegevoegd..
motor_vehicle=no is niet nodig hier.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-26 06:50:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.83657%2C4.65652%3B51.83730%2C4.65793
tordans (2021-12-22 13:21:36+00:00): I just checked at https://opendata-esri-de.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/57b70cd2682e475e8c90779b838c4167/explore?location=52.344058%2C13.605288%2C18.89, the street is called Kiefernring for the buildings right at the edge, so the way it is mapped now is correct.
user_13980615 (2021-12-22 13:31:21+00:00): 还需要补充一下，广场上的喷泉之所以没有把它们排除在行人区域（广场）之外，是因为他们是与地面平齐、隐蔽式的，上面是开孔的石板很多人都直接步行经过。
Vinber (2025-08-21 14:52:16+00:00): bonjour,
que signifie # AIT 2021 ?

c'est un évènement ponctuel ? les grilles ne sont pas définitives ?

à plus
Glassman (2021-12-25 20:39:26+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115256395
InfosReseaux (2023-01-21 17:45:34+00:00): Bonjour,

pourquoi avoir supprimé le chemin 962989491 ?

L'imagerie aérienne, aussi fraîche soit-elle n'est pas une raison pour supprimer une géométrie ajoutée dans un changeset muni de source=survey. Je me suis rendu sur le terrain et cette géométrie existe encore aujourd'hui.
Est-ce possible de le rétablir s'il vous plaît ?

Bonne soirée
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-01-22 19:46:06+00:00): En effet, my bad! C'est normalement rétabli.
InfosReseaux (2023-01-22 20:10:31+00:00): Merci pour la rapidité, c'est tout bon

Bonne fin de weekend
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-01-22 20:52:09+00:00): Merci vous aussi!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
user_5359 (2021-12-25 16:31:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Könntest Du bitte noch mehr Informationen über die GmbH eintragen (ev. Webseite (Schlüssel website), Telefon (Schlüssel phone), Art des Business (Geschäft https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop, ein Büro https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:office oder ein Handwerker https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft)?
eggie (2021-12-22 14:17:48+00:00): Beste Tanya.. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit geeft nogal eens schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.

MVG
eggie
Tanya Rademakers (2021-12-22 14:23:11+00:00): Hi, ohhhww, ok, sorry!!! Goed om te weten, ik zal er in het vervolg rekening mee houden!

Groeten, Tanya
SomeoneElse (2021-12-22 14:17:01+00:00): To anyone else who thinks that the language used in the "name" tag here is not the best one to use, please discuss at the forum link noted in the changeset comment before any changes.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-22 14:17:31+00:00): לכל מי שחושב שהשפה שבה נעשה שימוש בתג "שם" כאן אינה הטובה ביותר לשימוש, נא לדון בקישור הפורום שצוין בתגובת השינויים לפני כל שינוי.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-22 14:17:57+00:00): لأي شخص آخر يعتقد أن اللغة المستخدمة في علامة "الاسم" هنا ليست هي الأفضل للاستخدام ، يرجى المناقشة في رابط المنتدى المشار إليه في تعليق مجموعة التغييرات قبل أي تغييرات.
user_11418917 (2021-12-28 15:16:03+00:00): Dear Andy, I totally disagree with putting the 'name' tag in Arabic instead of Hebrew which is the language that's used in this area.           
The suggestion to change the name tag to Arabic was requested by not a local mapper, it was suggested by an Iranian mapper, which I don't want to get political but we all know the background of this.             
This same user used bad language and called me "racist and dismissive" in clear text which goes totally against the OSM guidelines! he had previously mass vandalize other countries around the map and did not get a single warning? instead you blocked me for calling him out https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5403              
You unfortunately decided to make this change based on a non local person and ignored a local mapper who suggested the name to be put in Hebrew. The names on the map should be according on the locals, which in the forum post a local mapper clearly said to not put it in Arabic.                  
Therefore, we should change the 'name' tag back to Hebrew based on what the local had said previously to you. And the only consideration of changing the name tag should be risen by locals only.      
Best Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-12-28 19:44:42+00:00): Hello,             
Plus what I have mentioned above here are a few other reasons why the name should be changed back to Hebrew instead of Arabic.     
A simple examination of the neighborhood you can see that's the only Arabic name in the Christian quarter is the new name of the neighborhood, everything else is almost all in Hebrew, Latin, Aramaic\Syriac, And Greek, each represents the ethnicity and religion of people who live there.            
Everyone should know that there is a difference between "Arab speakers" and "Arabs". The local people of the Christian quarter are not Arabs, they can speak Arabic but that doesn't make Arabic their mother language.        
The Arabic name of the Christian quarter is "حي النصارى" which sounds "Hay Al-Nasara" Hay=neighborhood, Al=The, Nasara=A word that's used by Muslims to call the Christian, Christians do not call themselves "Nasara" they call themselves Christians.         
For example here is an article from the Chaldean Patriarchate of Babylon to the Arab readers explain why it's Christians (مسيحيون) not Nasara (نصارى). https://saint-adday.com/?p=37321                
Even if you google "حي النصارى", Google will correct it to you and say "Christian Quarter (الحي المسيحي)". See: https://www.google.com/search?q=حي+النصارى       
Andy, if you really want the name to be in Arabic, at least put the name as if the locals would say it in Arabic, and that would be "الحي المسيحي".              
Best Regards.                 
                  
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71448
puchaczowsky (2021-12-22 15:33:42+00:00): w nazwie ulicy Grafitowa zrobiłeś literówkę ;)
G_P_J (2021-12-23 07:41:17+00:00): Zdarza się. Poprawione. Dzięki za czujność :)
wireguy (2021-12-22 18:04:45+00:00): hi simonah,  
I do not think adding way 1014350907 was the correct fix.  I think the correct fix is to select 
way 49276354
and then click Tools|Update multipoligon  Ctrl+Shift+B
aixbrick (2021-12-27 09:44:19+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du hast hier das gesamte Stück zwischen Siegenkamp und Kampstraße auf 50 gesetzt. Da 30 aber nur bis Urweg gilt, musst du an dieser Stelle den Straßenweg auftrennen (rechtsklick auf einen Knoten > Schere). Ich habe das korrigiert und auch das weitere Stück A.-Schw.-Straße auf 50 geändert.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115416719.
Gruß
aixbrick (2021-12-27 10:15:12+00:00): "Da 30 aber nur bis Urweg gilt [...]" -> Korrektur/Ergänzung: "Da 30 aber weiterhin bis Urweg gilt [...]". Dadurch kannst du beiden Stücken unterschiedliche maxspeed-Werte geben (30/50).
Frans S (2021-12-29 10:36:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115258237
Frans S (2021-12-29 10:42:32+00:00): Hi, 
A few remarks.
Sometimes a building continues next to your task square. Please follow the outlines next to the square as well to complete the building.
You have seen gray and blue objects as well. These are also buildings.  Check the shadow which proofs it is a building
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115258237
mueschel (2021-12-23 11:14:28+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - these post boxes have many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM. Could you check that?
user_5359 (2021-12-25 19:42:02+00:00): Hi,

ist the source="LaPoste - 2021-01" leagal for OSM?
user_5359 (2022-01-05 19:44:30+00:00): traduction automatique en français :
-Commentaire de mueschel--
Bonjour,
Il semble que quelque chose se soit mal passé ici - ces boîtes aux lettres ont de nombreuses balises étrangères qui ne semblent pas devoir être dans OSM. Pourriez-vous vérifier cela ?

--Commentaire de user_5359--
Bonjour,
La source="LaPoste - 2021-01" est-elle légale pour OSM ?

Veuillez répondre à cette question !
GeoMechain (2022-01-23 04:50:18+00:00): Bonjour,
La source est bien légale, puisque diffusée sous licence ODbL (données disponibles ici : https://datanova.laposte.fr/explore/dataset/laposte_boiterue/) mais il semble que ce changeset soit un import et non une intégration (aucune adaptation des tags sources). @racjul veuillez corriger ces points, sans quoi ce changeset sera revert. Une intégration manuelle avec Osmose (avec une vérification terrain) est plus adaptée.
osmviborg (2021-12-22 16:20:42+00:00): Hvad er 'Haminoen' for en ting? Ser underligt ud https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13577498
andershl (2021-12-22 19:25:07+00:00): TTT = ting tar tid. Den er ikke færdigtegnet og slåflej i navnet. Officielt indviet i forgårs. Omtale med kort og brochure her: https://halsnaes.dk/borger/natur/ture-og-oplevelser/halsninoen
guebosch (2022-01-04 11:07:37+00:00): Hallo Roland,
ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du einen neuen Weg nur für die Langlaufstrecke angelegt hast, obwohl bereits ein Weg tw. vorhanden ist. 
Diese Vorgehensweise ist nicht empfohlen. Hier eine Seite mit der korrekten Darstellung: https://www.opensnowmap.org/iframes/how-to-eng.html#further

Gerne auch bei Fragen an mich.

LG Günther
guebosch (2022-01-04 11:17:14+00:00): Mit dieser overpass Query hab ich diesen Mangel gefunden: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eL9
RolandGutw (2022-01-04 11:25:51+00:00): Hallo Günther danke für die Seite. Habe das Projekt zusammen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/santon Mussten teilweise größer umbauen aufgrund vieler Probleme. der Overpass Turbo zeigt jetzt noch einen Bereich an(Biathlon, Verbindungsloipe) wofür ich die Information noch nicht habe.
guebosch (2022-01-04 14:58:00+00:00): Hi Roland, 
Witzig, mit dem Anton hatte ich vor ein paar Tagen Kontakt wegen div. Loipen. Ich bin regelmäßig in der Ramau zum Skaten und hab GPX Tracking. Falls du ingendwo Hilfe oder Infos brauchst, gib Bescheid per OMS Nachricht.
LG Günther
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-29 10:46:07+00:00): Ciao. Puoi specificare qual è la sorgente per questa modifica? Il dato originario veniva dalla provincia di Biella (e infatti tutti i numeri civici hanno ancora l'altra denominazione). Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115259011
Claudev8 (2021-12-29 13:22:00+00:00): Ciao, 
       dato che la località dove passa la strada si chiama Cascina Colombera, ho ipotizzato un typo sul nome della via (che era Colombara).
Effettivamente si trovano riferimenti sia come Colombera che come Colombara.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-29 17:14:44+00:00): Ciao. Le modifiche non si dovrebbero fare d'istinto ma si devono basare su informazioni rilevate (ad esempio un cartello con il nome della via, lo stradario comunale, ecc). Ripristino la situazione precedente. Tra l'altro il place ha entrambi i nomi, uno nel tag name, l'altro nel tag alt_name. Ciao, Andrea
Claudev8 (2022-01-03 09:20:00+00:00): Ok, certo.
Proverò a passare da quelle parti o cercare qualche fonte in comune.
Saluti, Claudio
Claudev8 (2022-02-06 09:07:25+00:00): Ciao Andrea, sono finalmente andato a vedere di persona. Non c'è un cartello classico del con il nome della via in quella zona. L'unico cartello che ho trovato, si trova in Via Amendola e indica "Cascina Colombera" (che sembra più l'indicazione della località/frazione più che il nome della via).
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-06 13:43:19+00:00): Ciao Claudio. Grazie per la verifica sul luogo. Direi di lasciare la situazione attuale (nome della strada da dati della Provincia di Biella, nome del toponimo name="Cascina Colombera" + alt_name="Cascina Colombara"). Ciao, Andrea
Snusmumriken (2021-12-22 15:01:00+00:00): Hej

Jag tänkte kommentera en aspekt av dina förändringar. Du hade lagt till bus=yes och public_transport=platform på en del busshållplatser. Inom SL:s område så använder vi oss av en förenklad modell för public transport
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sweden/Public_transport#F.C3.B6renklad_PT-taggning_f.C3.B6r_bussar

som inte innehåller dessa taggar. Jag vet att redigeraren du använde, iD kommer med dessa förändringsförslag, men vänligen ignorera dessa förslag när det kommer till public transport inom SL:s område.
gs3§zba (2022-01-28 17:22:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014362061
Soll das ein Scherz sein?
SBartsch (2022-01-28 18:06:37+00:00): Nein, warum? Zusätzliche Quellen: https://oberhausen-donau.de/tourismus/wanderwege/rundwanderweg-floramoos_id1641 und https://www.donaukurier.de/lokales/neuburg/Zeugen-der-Zeit-aus-Beton;art1763,4739354
gs3§zba (2022-01-29 05:59:31+00:00): Aha. Sachen gibt's.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
droogmic (2022-01-24 11:35:07+00:00): Regarding way: 788112202 and 34213195
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
On the ground I see grade 2. This also causes routing issues. May I revert to grade 2?
maxerickson (2022-02-27 21:17:04+00:00): Hi, there's a widely used tag for sections, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dsector (I've changed them here, just explaining the change).
dodgese (2022-04-05 13:52:05+00:00): Ty, very much for the update.
eggie (2021-12-22 16:29:11+00:00): Dag Sneeuwmanneke
Alle begin is moeilijk.. zeker mappen in OSM.
In deze changeset heb je Hagedoorn 3 verplaatst naar de rijbaan. Het adres staat dus niet meer op de woning. Ik zal het herstellen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115260463
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 16:33:07+00:00): Het fietspad heet ook cichoreipad.. Ik heb die naam toegevoegd.
Verder missen hier een paar wegdelen.
gr eggie
Sneeuwmanneke (2021-12-22 16:34:55+00:00): Ja het mappen van de Hagedoornweg was zeker niet mijn bedoeling. Het Cichoreipad is inderdaad een fietspad en de huizen hebben zowel bij nr 18 t/m 12 een weg voor de deur. Het stuk straat bij nr 2 -8 mist nog.. maar ik durf het niet te tekenen (gebrek aan ervaring).
Sneeuwmanneke (2021-12-22 16:35:33+00:00): Het deel rechts van mijn aanpassing moest dus zijn dat het geen Dovenetelweg ism maar Cichoreipad.
eggie (2021-12-22 16:49:08+00:00): De situatie heb ik aangepast..  Ontbrekende delen toegevoegd. Het fietspad eindigt nu op het woonerf dat nog niet op de kaart stond.
Even ctrl-F5 een paar keer om het effect op je scherm te zien.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 17:01:15+00:00): Volgende keer gewoon proberen. En dan vraag je een review (hokje aanvinken bij upload) 

Dan kijkt een ervaren mapper wel en die zal vast wel helpen.
De straatnamen kloppen in ieder geval nu :)

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 17:12:33+00:00): De straten zijn nog een import uit 2007 vanuit de database van kaartenmaker AND. (donatie)
Genoeg te doen hier om er iets van te maken.