piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcliquid (2022-06-14 17:47:34+00:00): Wie kommt man hier auf 25 Fahrspuren? :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262716792/history#map=17/53.26915/8.38243
SekeRob (2022-03-20 11:09:20+00:00): Hi,

You linked a line from a far separate grassland to another causing the render to go white. Duly fixed, I think (therefore I am ;o)

ciao
astraspera (2022-03-20 12:06:16+00:00): Thank you, 
I noticed the rendering issue just after my changeset, so I was waiting OSM Inspector explaining the problem...

ciao
SekeRob (2022-03-20 14:35:06+00:00): Hi,

It"s actually quite easy to diagnose on not too monstrous multipolygons. In Carto standard view mode go to any border you know is part of the MP. Right click and choose query features. Select the suspect in list on left screen bar. It should highlight Red border. Look around for open ends, self intersections, or in this case a border line way outside. Those are the main 3 causing rendering to go blank. Inner outer roles have some tolerance, need correcting still. 

Cheers
Rom1 (2022-03-22 10:37:13+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041828539 car l'imagerie aérienne ne montre pas l'existence d'un chemin. Il convient d'éviter de tracer des chemins sur la seule base de la BD Topo (ou du cadastre...) mais de les vérifier sur le terrain. C'est certes long mais c'est garantir une donnée de qualité. Merci.
PS : on se réunit à Vandoeuvre (Fabrique des Possibles https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/les-groupes-locaux-openstreetmap-en-france_151003#6/46.950/2.571) demain à partir de 18:00. Une bonne occasion pour échanger.
keepright! ler (2023-08-24 16:45:44+00:00): Was genau bedeutet das mobile in highway=mobile_speed_camera?
HirschKauz (2022-03-20 07:04:44+00:00): Hi! mobile speed-cams are never tagged on OSM. fixed ones are tagged, but in a different way, please read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera 
Greets!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118683183
L___I (2022-03-23 22:02:42+00:00): Hallo HirschKauz,
[...] mobile speed-cams are never tagged on OSM [...]
Das stimmt so nicht. Ich habe gerade mal durchgeschaut wenigsten 15 (vermutlich mehr) verschiedene Benutzer haben versucht sie zu erfassen. 
Siehe dazu auch die leicht modifizierte Anfrage von:user_5359 https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1h6q
Allerdings werden sie eben meist unter der Verwendung des unstimmigen Merkmals einer stationären Einheit eingetragen.
Ich vermute da besteht ein gewisses Interesse und außerdem vermute ich, das wird auch in Zukunft immer wieder aktuell bleiben.

[...] fixed ones are tagged, but [...]
Korrekt, stationäre Einheiten werden mit highway=speed_camera (defacto) versehen.
Ich fand hier eine mobile Einheit unstimmig erfasst als stationäre Einheit vor.
Was ich hier zwischen 
a) vollständiger Löschung und 
b) falsche Erfassung beibehalten
als Kompromiss gemacht habe, ist es unter einem anderen Merkmal-Wert 'mobile_street_camera' zu erfassen.
Generell habe ich nichts gegen das vollständige Löschen, allerdings kann ich einige verstehen, die den Sachverhalt in OSM abgebildet haben möchten.
Unter Umständen geht es hier auch nicht direkt um die mobilen Einrichtung, sondern eher um die Plätze, Stichwort: "Radarschwerpunkt"
Grüsse

Siehe auch andere Änderung mit Kommentar:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118652015
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:04:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t delete private ways, if the exists. You can mark them with access=private (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) .
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-25 02:08:41+00:00): Hello, can you explain what this object is?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3722312
nevw (2022-03-20 02:36:43+00:00): Hi
can you have another look at the new road construction here using more up to date satellite imagery from Maxar.
Howe Street seems to be part of or joins Flax Way instead of separate roads as you have drawn it.
nevw (2022-03-29 06:35:25+00:00): no response, remapped remotely using later Maxar imagery
ortho_is_hot (2022-03-20 11:55:47+00:00): Hiya, just commenting because you requested a review; this is all correct provided the roads are after a 40 area sign, and don't have an end 40 area sign. (unrelated to OSM, is this the new 40 zone they talked about or is it an existing one?).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
just_another_mapper (2022-03-24 08:19:56+00:00): I walked around the perimeter of the area and noted all the 40 area / end 40 area signs. It's new, they've just taken the covers off most of the signs. There's also some new traffic calming at the various start/end points which I haven't mapped yet - a few road tables, and in some areas a band of textured road surface (not sure if that can be mapped in OSM).
ortho_is_hot (2022-03-24 10:57:14+00:00): Ah fantastic, I remember having read that in the council minutes but didn't check up to see if that actually happened. There was some talk about those sorts of texture bands, if they exist at the entrances to side streets for instance (see Hall Street / Glenayr Avenue intersection in Bondi), then they can be mapped as traffic_calming=threshold as threshold seems to be the term used in Australia
Glassman (2022-03-20 19:51:29+00:00): #TIP: Waterfalls should be added as a node to the stream with the tag waterway=waterfall + name=* + height=* + width=* (the last three tags are all optional) If the creek hasn't been added yet it's ok to add a node at the location of the waterfall.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118683638
Vintagehotdog (2022-03-20 20:14:22+00:00): I'm still not sure I get it. Did I leave it as a point? Did you edit it to a waterway node? I see in the box next to waterway it says 'milestone" but their is a choice for 'waterfall'. In my humble opinion 'waterfall should be a choice under Natural Features, but then they are my favorite!
Glassman (2022-03-20 20:46:35+00:00): I didn't edit it originally but just added the Sulphur Creek Falls as a node on the creek. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118710144. (I accidentally copied the entire description but fixed it on this edit.) After adding the node to the stream, just search for waterfall.  I left your original node in place. BTW - there are two waterfalls with the same name. If they are unnamed it's best to just tag them as a waterfall and not add a descriptive name. I hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118683638
QC3 Construction (2022-03-30 07:17:38+00:00): Sports Details are inacurate
Warin61 (2022-03-30 08:16:18+00:00): How so? 

They all appear present on Bing imagery .. which is the source used by this changeset. 

Looking on Maxar imagery only soccer could be questioned, and that is probably caused by the grass growing ready for next season.
hoserab (2022-03-20 02:30:24+00:00): Accidentally requested a review w/ an errant click, honestly don't think it needs it...
Iain I (2022-03-20 14:38:18+00:00): Verified to clear warning. Edit was made by a knowledgeable  mapper with high level of local knowledge of the area
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118683928
Oregonian3 (2022-03-27 20:01:00+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you added some trails along the Valleyview Ridge that have been actively decommissioned since the satellite imagery was taken (i.e. they've been completely obliterated). I've removed these trails again.
BreckT (2022-03-27 20:52:46+00:00): Thank for letting me know. How do I find out about decommissioned trails so I don't add them in the future?
BreckT (2022-03-27 20:56:30+00:00): I've tried to identity what I added and what you removed but I'm unfamiliar with how to see that level of detail. I'm trying to to Identify Valley View Ridge. I can see on the topo layer Valley View Canyon but not the ridge
Oregonian3 (2022-03-27 21:02:16+00:00): No worries at all! There's a few resources out there on the Foothill trails master plan that are helpful for this region at this link: https://www.slc.gov/parks/trails-natural-lands/ftsmp/

Unfortunately the new trails they built last year (and the associated decommissioning) don't exactly match up with the plan, so there's unfortunately really no way to tell other than by waiting for the imagery to be updated and relying on local knowledge. As far as I know the only actively-decommissioned trail so far is the ridgeline trail and its associated connectors, but there will probably be more in the future.

As to the Valleyview Ridge, it's just an unofficial name for the minor ridgeline that runs northward from the water tank at the end of the Terrace Hills West Trail.
BreckT (2022-03-27 21:11:19+00:00): Thank you for the link. It has some great information. I hiked a number of trails in the area last week and uploaded my GPS track to make minor changed that I noticed. I usually get carried away and go beyond the area I observed and make other changes that I want to be helpful. I'll be more careful in the future.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-22 11:10:13+00:00): this should not be tagged as a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118684141
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-20 09:45:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118689705 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5814 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-20 09:45:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118689705 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5814 .
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:01:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
BudgieInWA (2022-03-29 10:39:56+00:00): The kerb shouldn't go on a path that it doesn't interrupt (the sidewalk). The kerb should go where the kerb would intersect the crossing. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119062309
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118684680
muchichka_s (2022-03-20 05:48:25+00:00): Now is not the best time for to change wikipedia links and names, your edits look provocative. This is not in line with the agreements of the local community of mappers. Also, very often after your edits, links to Wikipedia become invalid. Stop doing that
slice0 (2022-03-20 08:23:23+00:00): responding here because the note is closed... this is awesome it looks great I can help with the names and do the intersection routing properly, fantastic!
Fizzie-DWG (2022-03-20 22:33:31+00:00): Thanks! Yeah, Legoe Rd / Riverlea Blvd is a bit of a question? Location SA still has Legoe Rd running in but their map is a different layout to what's visible in Maxar, so not sure if it should be Riverlea Blvd right out to the Hwy? Also not sure what happens to Legoe Rd in between Buckland Rd & the big roundabout?
slice0 (2022-03-20 23:09:31+00:00): I will be driving through the intersection later today/tonight, ill take  pictures, I havent taken note of the names in the past drove through it yesterday too lol
slice0 (2022-03-20 23:10:45+00:00): I can check my dashcam but dont think the resolution is good enough to clearly see street names
slice0 (2022-03-20 23:50:56+00:00): this is my dashcam from yesterday going past at 110km/h heading north on port wakefield road , its not the clearest but the left turn is defo riverlea blvd https://imgur.com/lKDbgPB , i will go down the road to the new estate today and take better pictures
Fizzie-DWG (2022-03-21 00:30:53+00:00): Thanks! I'll update that now. The other bit I'm not sure about is the creek / pond? On their website they've got this beautiful lake but there's only a long skinny puddle in imagery :-) Is it a creek or supposed to become a pond / lake?
slice0 (2022-03-21 08:09:07+00:00): ok I went there, it's all closed off pretty much but I was abe to get the names of the 3 roads that were missing, cant turn left at the roundabout there is a fence https://imgur.com/a/QlkZDlv
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-22 11:09:27+00:00): Why is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298472135 tagged as a building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118684965
tastrax (2022-03-21 00:37:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mueschel (2022-04-10 17:37:43+00:00): Hi
you added a strange tag to two nodes:
"lavel:manufacturer" - what does this mean?
ameziol (2022-03-20 09:26:10+00:00): Proszę podawaj źródło przy proponowanych drogach
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 06:51:47+00:00): Przy proponowanych również? Wpisywać podczas tworzenia obiektu dodać źródło czy tylko jak już wysyłam do zatwierdzenia ?
ameziol (2022-06-08 10:03:21+00:00): Źródła w obu miejscach to dobra praktyka, łatwiej się potem połapać w tym wszystkim. Zwłaszcza źródło w obiekcie (source=*), bo następny mapujący od razu w edytorze widzi skąd dana linia się wzięła
gpserror (2022-07-29 04:54:57+00:00): hi, I noticed you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041871209 - but it doesn't fully connect through a road that was already on the map -- it overlaps it, could you take a look at the overlap?  The overlapping way is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442904010 .  Thanks!
pvt (2022-07-30 16:29:46+00:00): Hi! Thanks for catching this and reaching out - not sure how I missed this! I've removed the segment of the newer way that overlapped with the newer - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124274794 Let me know if there are additional changes you would like me to make
ivanbranco (2022-03-20 13:36:46+00:00): Hi mapperue,

you added an invalid place value here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55739452/history

was it supposed to be addr:place=* instead?
mapperue (2022-03-20 14:24:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for your attention. It's fixed now.
Kin Sapalot (2022-03-20 13:26:05+00:00): Hoi Rutger,

Het is de OSM NL conventie om een winkel op de adres POI te mappen, ipv op een losse, adres-loze, POI - voeg je ze nog even samen? Ook de tandarts uit de andere change a.u.b.

Bedankt en veel map plezier!
Kin Sapalot
flohoff (2022-03-20 20:05:57+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier den changeset entdeckt weil der zu einer ungewollten Routingänderung geführt hat:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=362450,404165#51.78696,8.44231,13z

Neu ist grün. Ich habe da jetzt mal über lanes und co das versucht zu reparieren. Mal sehen ob das wirkt.

Aber: Weshalb ich eigentlich schreibe ist das ein "maxspeed:type=DE:rural" nicht ausreichend ist. Dazu gehört immer noch ein maxspeed=100 - Also eigentlich.

Gabs auch schon diverse diskussionen im Forum.

Flo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-20 09:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118689705 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5814 .
eggie (2022-03-20 14:49:35+00:00): Dag Rutger.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode
MVG
eggie
wkdgs (2022-03-24 09:25:30+00:00): Ich habe die beiden description-Tags wieder entfernt, da dieser Tag nicht für Werbebotschaften gedacht ist. 

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118686579
user_5359 (2022-03-30 17:34:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4939309103. What is the meaning of the tag why = 新桥辅助编组站下马 ?

你好！ 请查看 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4939309103。 标签的含义是什么
tonyf1 (2022-03-20 22:13:48+00:00): Hi. This is where changeset comments are helpful. With this and previous edits and reversions its very hard for me to work out what you have done. Ideally the changeset comment should say what you have done and why. We, including me, are all guilty of this to some extent.
tonyf1 (2022-03-20 23:59:04+00:00): Hi, in case you are not monitoring talk-au, letting you know that I have posted on the use of access=destination.
user_5359 (2022-03-22 21:04:41+00:00): Hello! Please move the node from the street to the building?
martianfreeloader (2026-06-15 19:54:36+00:00): Hi, there is an anonymous report conflicting with your map edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5341090

Can you help?
tastrax (2022-03-21 00:48:07+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Sam Wilson (2022-03-22 05:20:54+00:00): Thanks!

Do you do these fixes automatically? I mean, if I'm lazy and forget, am I making lots of extra work for you or do you have a script that makes it all easy? I don't want to offload laziness on you! :-)
tastrax (2022-03-22 05:29:20+00:00): Hi Sam - I check these via some Map Roulette challenges each month. https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/4412 Its quite easy so its not a hassle as there is usually less than a dozen, per state, per month. It would be hard to script I reckon as there are so many ways that folks add the numbers. A group of us did a mass edit a couple of years ago when the numbers were in the 1,000's so now its just picking up new users or inadvertent slip ups.
Sam Wilson (2022-03-22 05:38:22+00:00): Ah, good to know! Thanks. I'll try to be better in future, because I do normally know better. :) It's just sometimes that my family is yelling at me to stop-always-mapping hehe so I go a bit fast.
tastrax (2022-03-22 06:05:07+00:00): No worries - I also usually dont send comments on every one I fix, usually just one per user if I think they are new. In your case I noted you were running meet ups so its a good thing to remind folks about if you get a chance. Keep up the good work... maybe Ice Cream shop mapping with the family - but they have to spot the shops first!!
sinopitt (2022-03-25 13:31:04+00:00): 您好，鉴于阳新高速固始-商城段还在施工，我已经将状态修改为施工中。
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-20 15:23:19+00:00): ご意見・ご感想：Twitterでご指摘いただいたように、建物を四角くするときは、「Q」ボタン、またはオブジェクトを右クリックして「四角」を選択し、オブジェクトの角を四角くすることを忘れないでください。

-

Feedback; As pointed out by a twitter user, do not forget to square buildings where appropriate using the "Q" button, or by right clicking on an object and choosing "Square", to square the corners of the object.

Regards,

Daniel
yuiseki (2022-03-21 09:17:36+00:00): Thanks for your comment.
I am a beginner and would like to learn a lot about mapping.

I learned to square the buildings and fixed it in the next changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118721054

Best regards,

yuiseki

-

コメントありがとうございます。
私は初心者なので、いろいろ勉強しながらマッピングしていきたいと思っています。

建物を四角くすることを覚えて、次の編集セットで修正してみました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118721054

よろしくお願いします。

yuiseki
adriespo (2022-06-05 20:12:43+00:00): Ma che figata che c'è qualcun altro che opera sui sentieri della zona!

Io sto esplorando tantissimo, dotato di GPS e gambe che ancora reggono e sto scoprendo un sacco di percorsi bollati di giallo e mulattiere pavimentate. Questa zona è piena di cose interessanti. Grazie per contribuire!
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2022-03-20 10:53:01+00:00): Cześć,
proszę nie dubluj nazwy szkoły na budynku, jeśli już jest dodana do obszaru (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293048997).
Więcej informacji znajdziesz na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2022-10-30 21:26:01+00:00): Wobec braku odpowiedzi, poprawiłem mapowanie.
EMREOYUN (2022-03-21 17:04:00+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
FenyMufyd (2022-03-20 09:14:56+00:00): Mass deletion tag is a false positive. I simplified the overdetailed river nodes by 3 meter error
Vinber (2022-03-22 18:05:39+00:00): reverted
Vinber (2022-03-22 18:08:46+00:00): reverted
user_5359 (2022-03-30 10:38:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9273513113. Did you mean socket:tesla_supercharger:output=.. kW instead of kWh=... (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station)
Amin Fozdar (2022-03-30 12:30:42+00:00): Ok thanks. I fixed it now, but not to match what you said, as I had a more detailed look at the charging station OSM wiki tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
surveyor54 (2023-01-18 09:52:14+00:00): Hi,
ist das NSG "Sippenauer Moor " wirklich mit einer Mauer umgeben?
Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2023-02-01 13:54:02+00:00): Es wäre schön, wenn du mir antworten würdest. 😒
surveyor54 (2023-02-09 14:06:08+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Korrektur.
hanchao (2022-03-31 10:05:44+00:00): 名字为507的管道是什么？
ivanbranco (2022-03-20 13:39:24+00:00): Hi AmanBD,

I don't really see the point in adding the surface tag to single nodes belonging to a way already having a surface tag, such as here for example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6994048599/history
Vinber (2022-03-22 17:42:23+00:00): Bonjour,
vous dites que c'est la bdortho IGN qui est utilisée comme source mais il n'y a rien de visible.

Pourriez vous préciser un peu svp ?
Vinber (2022-03-22 18:10:01+00:00): En fait après avoir regardé les autres changesets, annulation et signalement pour blocage
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-20 09:45:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118684390, 118684402, 118686196.
ivanbranco (2022-03-21 15:55:31+00:00): Ciao Keio,

benvenuto su OSM!
Un tip: il tag building=* indica la funzione per cui l'edificio è stato creato (che non sempre coincide con l'uso attuale). Il tag per mappare un hotel è "tourism=hotel".

Buon mapping! :)
patervatebre (2022-04-22 13:59:20+00:00): Why is the tree row needed on top of the existing tree nodes?
sibric (2022-04-27 20:54:02+00:00): I tried to give this tree row a name so that the name ("Mammutbaum-Allee") shows up when zooming to this tree row but obviously I didn't manage that... I'm not exerienced at all in osm
alester (2022-03-21 18:37:37+00:00): From what I can see, the license on the marineregions.org data is incompatible with the OSM license because they use CC-BY. There would need to be an explicit waiver in place. Do you know if that has already been done in the past for this data source?
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility#CC_BY

Also, the new data seems to conflict between Graham Island and Prince of Wales Island, where the territorial waters now overlap and create a "disputed" area. Most of the sources I'm seeing show a straight-line boundary like the previous version of the data, not the rounded one introduced by this edit. It might be a good idea to revert that part until more consistent sources can be found.
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-21 06:36:18+00:00): Hello. As per aggreemnt of Lithuanian mappers, we do not tag sidewalks as separate ways if they are not separated by a physical barrier - at least a meter of grass or similar. They introduce pointless complexity, errors (as they've done now) and are mostly useless...
limes11 (2022-03-20 11:07:38+00:00): Hi, 

das sollte wohl "Rheinblick" heißen. 

Stimmt die Position? Die eingetragene Stelle ist mitten im Wald. Sieht man von dort über den Rhein?

VG, Limes
berndw (2022-03-20 11:25:55+00:00): Hi, es wäre auch schön, wenn anstelle von name=Birne genus=* mit dem lateinischen Namen verwendet würde.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
https://www.baumlexikon.com/birne/