piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jcarlson (2021-12-17 14:33:43+00:00): I get that, and sometimes that's the case. In my opinion, the business is not the building, it just happens to be using the building. Handling business entities as areas introduces a lot of complexity and arbitrariness.
To pick two examples outs of this changeset: suppose I am out in the Menards lumberyard area, or eating at the Chick-fil-A outdoor seating. Have I left the "place of business"? Not really, no. But how do we map that out? Does it stop at the parking lot, or include that, too? Are we just mapping parcels at that point?
It's worth pointing out that there's no rule that a business area has to correspond to a building. Mapping the "place of business" as an area independent of building features is actually how some mappers are addressing multi-business buildings like malls.
It doesn't help that iD has `building=yes` built into a lot of the business area presets.
It's OSM, so, y'know, do whatever you want! I just feel that maintaining businesses as POIs is clearer, easier to maintain, and sidesteps the entire issue of "how many businesses are in the building" and "does the business operate outside of the building".
Final point: keep in mind that having one POI just means there's one POI *mapped*. The Target near me has an optical store, a Starbucks, and a CVS inside, each operating independently. Or in downtown Yorkville, many of the businesses are just the first floor, with apartments above. To say the building itself is the business is inaccurate. But a point that says "this business is here", that's correct!
user_5359 (2021-12-17 17:00:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913901034/history: Did you mean loc_name (for local name) instead of log_name?
APneunzehn74 (2021-12-17 21:23:19+00:00): Hello thank you, yes loc_name is right.
JJIglesias (2021-12-16 05:22:45+00:00): Por favor DEJEN DE COLOCAR data Poblacional INVENTADA, el Unico ente Autorizado para publicar Estadisticas Oficiales de Poblacion es el INE, y su data Oficial es una villa de 248 Habitantes, no de 4000 y pico. No hay justificacion alguna para mostrar 4000 y pico habitantes en un centro poblacional q solo tiene 20 a 30 construcciones Urbanas. Gracias
JJIglesias (2021-12-16 05:43:51+00:00): Si vuelven a colocar DATA NO OFICIAL o INVENTADA en el Mapa. Voy a Iniciar el Procedimiento para que su Cuenta sea ELIMINADA por Sabotear el Mapa. No Pueden poner DATA INVENTADA y NO RESPALDADA. Les queda Claro? Gracias
boopington (2021-12-16 05:05:03+00:00): wrong comment lol
Warin61 (2021-12-17 00:05:30+00:00): Hi
Relation 13555927 is not closed (landuse=farmland)

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13555927#map=16/-34.5526/146.0056 and https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.00382&lat=-34.55385&zoom=15
TobyOrr (2022-03-18 01:28:43+00:00): Thanks for your feedback on this and several other items.

I have just become aware that, for quite a few months, my email account has been sending emails from OpenStreetMap directly to spam because of a large number of dubious ladies seeking my friendship via the OpenStreetMap message system.

I want to reassure you and the other people who messaged me or left changeset comments that I was not deliberately ignoring messages - I was just unaware that they were being trashed as spam. I have now changed account settings regarding mail from OpenStreeMap.
elsy1 (2021-12-16 07:50:52+00:00): درود چه توضیحی برای رسم این آزادراه! با این اسم ناشناس دارید؟
elsy1 (2021-12-16 07:57:58+00:00): اقدام شما در تمامی رسم های اخیرتون خرابکارانه هست
Владимир К (2022-01-12 17:08:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1302803096

вот эта точка не должна быть жд переездом, там даже следов от путей не осталось на дороге. убрал. и линию поправил. не надо отмечать то, что было раньше, в osm отмечается текущая ситуация
Frans S (2021-12-28 14:00:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
Buildings should be tagged as building=yes.
Nothing else.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114988712
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Lee Carré (2021-12-16 17:23:44+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mashin (2021-12-17 04:16:49+00:00): Hi Rachit_,
what Lee wanted to say is Welcome to OSM and thanks for editing!

Two things that you could make better:
1. Try to have your changeset comments more descriptive so others have a better idea of what've done.
2. Before you move to the next location, hit the save button to upload your changes that are in the area you've just edited.

Cheers
mavl (2021-12-17 15:33:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок добавляет улицу прямо поверх другой существующей в том же месте улицы. Это ошибка. Если на местности одна улица, то и на карте должна быть одна улица.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C  
  
Дубликат улицы удалён.
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 06:28:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114799253, 114800313, 114805700, 114806200, 114806490.
MxxCon (2021-12-16 07:11:54+00:00): Hello.
Could you please confirm if this whole giant area has a single address of 78 John Miller Way?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114989703
user_5359 (2021-12-16 06:30:23+00:00): Sorry, wrong change set comment added, correct comment should be: Correct wikipedia notation
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 06:43:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 114372442.
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:26+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113972129, 113973211, 113993995, 114006562, 114008681, 114029216, 114045132, 114066643, 114066772, 114068060, 114068216, 114072765, 114073597, 114075019, 114075502, 114075551, 114075973, 114076887, 114078117, 114104413, 114160380, 114186589, 114187874, 114187893, 114194828, 114201762, 114202731, 114203058, 114203364, 114203656, 114208535, 114209682, 114214121, 114214806, 114215839, 114216365, 114218374, 114220960, 114243232, 114243386, 114268515, 114270461, 114271861, 114272825, 114273908, 114274659, 114274888, 114311410, 114311432, 114323961, 114325183, 114325707, 114326481, 114362953, 114364983, 114365855, 114367142, 114367726, 114368467, 114370573, 114381808, 114639161.
impiaaa (2021-12-17 16:27:17+00:00): Hello and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. It's good practice to use the changeset description to actually describe what you changed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Additionally, it's good practice to save the changes in one changeset in one local area before moving somewhere else. Many OSM tools use a bounding box to determine the area that a changeset covers, and it's tough to see what's changed when it covers half of a continent.
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-21 17:42:56+00:00): Hey arnalielsewhere,

It is possible the following area is a cemetery.
They're usually a short distance away from a residential area and not attached to farmland etc.. Graves(or memorials) may be misinterpreted as small, undefined buildings or (industrial) activities. Actual buildings can also be present.
They're usually scattered, whereas a residential area would be more structured.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012670228
This doesn't always rule out it's a (rural) settlement though.

Regards,

Daniel
arnalielsewhere (2022-10-20 07:24:16+00:00): Hi Daniel, apologies for the delayed response. Didn't get a notification.

It doesn't look like cemetery for me. I come from the Philippines, and houses are scattered. This is common in coastal areas. In addition, houses have trees in between.

Appreciate your comment :)
vulasala (2021-12-17 06:31:50+00:00): Hi Laundry Banyuwangi,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 1012670490 from service to residential, as the way giving access to multiple rooftops.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114990910
E de Wit (2021-12-16 09:10:03+00:00): Hi,

This changeset created 84 empty nodes in The Netherlands spread across the country.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=114991005#7/51.917/3.686

-E de Wit
Shaw_Sank (2021-12-16 14:58:37+00:00): Hi E de Wit, thanks for notifying me. The data has been corrected now.
SekeRob (2021-12-16 15:57:09+00:00): Finally, with this oversized change set, a dozen a day crow-barring their way into my local history view, now I get it what this linked view does and how to use it to see where it actually hits the ground. Hit today on a farm track that had 20 nodes within 100 meters, virtually straight... a data import effort of 10 years ago. It's like those BAG imports in the Netherlands, Countless nodes per house in a row.

Thanks E de Wit, and Shaw_Sank may hope for redemption ;O)))
user_12500175 (2021-12-16 13:28:03+00:00): Hallo, 
du solltest die Eigenschaften vom Subway an den Node hinzufügen nicht an den Gebäudeumriss
archpdx (2021-12-16 07:28:54+00:00): Really appreciate your edits from this past month! Not sure if you're affiliated with TriMet but adding these addresses improves their trip planner as it relies on OSM data
Supaplex (2021-12-18 01:34:13+00:00): 請問這裡真的有7-Eleven嗎?如果只是規劃中，還沒有實體的地點，並不適合放到反映現實狀況的 OpenStreetMap 當中
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114992202
vulasala (2021-12-17 08:24:15+00:00): Hi PeterJR,
Trust you are doing well. I have removed the way 1012676443, as it is creating duplicate ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114992210
ravali_78 (2021-12-17 05:27:02+00:00): Hi khanhluongpy,
I have removed overlapping unclassified highway.Kindly check with way 1012677761, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115034379.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114992397
eggie (2021-12-16 07:51:09+00:00): Dag HMSM  Lijkt me oke.
De oneway=yes richting staat nu correct.
De aparte uitzonderingen van tweewielers zou nog 'moeten' ingevoerd worden volgens de 'nieuwe' taggingregels.  Er staat nog steeds cycleway=opposite Dat werkt overigens wel. 
MVG
eggie
trial (2021-12-16 20:30:53+00:00): Re-bonsoir, un jour cette boutique finira dans doute au bon endroit...
Toujours cordialement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-12-17 08:02:36+00:00): Bonsoir,

C'est corrigé, 
Très cordialement,

L'Equipe DB
eggie (2021-12-16 07:54:38+00:00): Dag HMSM
Dit is correct gedaan.

MVG
eggie
seattlefyi (2021-12-18 02:01:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! It appeared that the building you drew was already on the map. Thanks for the address, I moved it to the existing building, separating the number from the street name and expanding the abbreviations. For the result, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29252347. I would suggest right-clicking on objects on osm.org and using "Query Features" to view existing objects for mapping examples. Thanks again!
5m4u9 (2021-12-17 01:03:21+00:00): Hi, please dont delete these gates because they exist are rarely opened.
aleksaJov (2021-12-17 10:16:01+00:00): Hello 51114u9,

I was delete only duplicate gates which has been on parking polygon. The gates on node from service road is intact. This is Osmose logical issue fix.

Regards,
Aleksandar
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 14:00:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9342783484/history has cuisine = asian;麵 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be cuisine = asian
?

If extra character at the end is intentional - would it be possible to express that cuisine as an English value so it would be understood more easily? See some already documented values in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
Supaplex (2021-12-18 01:33:56+00:00): 請問這裡真的有這個地方嗎?如果只是規劃中，還沒有實體的地點，並不適合放到反映現實狀況的 OpenStreetMap 當中
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114993395
osmviborg (2021-12-16 08:26:28+00:00): Hej. Nu er det anden gang du sletter et stort stykke vej. Lad være med det. Du angiver som grund, at der er adgangsforbud for forgængere og cyklister. Vejen er tagget med 'bicycle=no' & 'foot=no', så begrænsningen er allerede på plads.
AstridRV (2021-12-16 08:47:39+00:00): Hej osmviborg.
Ja det er anden gang. Jeg troede, at det var en fejl, at det blev rettet første gang jeg havde redigeret. 
Husk at skrive pænt til andre mennesker, som måske ikke er så erfarne brugere.
eggie (2021-12-16 08:51:53+00:00): Dag HMSM  Ook hier... Is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 08:56:12+00:00): Uitzonderingen op oneway=yes voor tweewielers toegevoegd.
HMSM (2021-12-16 08:58:22+00:00): Dag Eggie,

er is een uitzondering voor tweewielers in de Deimanstraat.


Er zijn mij nog 3 andere straten doorgegeven waar ik niet uitkomt, zou u daarbij kunnen helpen?
HMSM (2021-12-16 09:01:40+00:00): op de Heiloostraat in den haag zou een rij richting niet kloppen maar ik kan dit niet terugvinden
eggie (2021-12-16 09:16:55+00:00): Zal zo even kijken..  Normaliter zijn er verkeersbesluiten. Die kun je dan terugvinden in de Staatscourant.
eggie (2021-12-16 09:30:29+00:00): https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2019-56038.pdf

Ik maak dan gewoon een zoekslag in google naar de staatscourant

Aangepast inmiddels naar oneway=yes muv tweewielers
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 08:50:46+00:00): Klopt volgens luchtfoto pdok 2021
eggie (2021-12-16 08:40:12+00:00): Dag HMSM
Het zal ongetwijfeld correct zijn nu, maar geldt hier een uitzondering voor tweewielers?
Dan oneway:bicycle=no toevoegen en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 08:47:09+00:00): De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers heb ik toegevoegd.
Het zou betekenen dat eenrichtingsverkeer (richting) hier ergens kortgeleden  is gewijzigd?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 08:49:14+00:00): Volgens de meest recente  luchtfoto klopt je wijziging.
Xevi (2021-12-25 19:59:26+00:00): Siusplau no facis servir els elements de tipus attracion per agafar notes sobre el que veus al mapa. Agafa punts d'interès en el mòbil i passals al portàtil després, però aquesta no es una bona practica
CENTRALHUB (2022-01-14 16:34:50+00:00): Hi。大熊猫国家公园的边界在泸定县境内是否可以更加精确或细化？这个公园的边界不太可能以这种方式横穿县城城区。谢谢
user_2066394 (2021-12-16 12:00:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/128226
Die Ampel hat's verschoben.
eggie (2021-12-17 07:45:33+00:00): Dag B en A   Je bijdrage heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode op het gebouw zelf. 
MVG
eggie
plennert (2022-12-31 18:44:24+00:00): sind die Daten des tags flow-rates, rechnerische Werte oder vor Ort gemessene Werte?
pesec (2021-12-17 10:49:41+00:00): Рекомендую так же при добавлении жилой зоны указывать её тип.
В данном случае:
residential=rural
eggie (2021-12-16 09:33:42+00:00): Ja ook hier weer... Is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers anders routeert het niet goed. ??
eggie (2021-12-16 09:37:43+00:00): Uitzondering tweewielers toegevoegd.
Je kunt er van uitgaan dat in al die binnenstraten een uitzondering voor moped/mofa en bicycle geldt.

gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 09:45:28+00:00): https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2019-34722.pdf
eggie (2021-12-16 09:49:49+00:00): Moet nog even checken.. Het is niet heel de straat..
eggie (2021-12-16 10:35:57+00:00):  in de
Leggelostraat (tussen de Steenwijklaan en de Coevordenstraat, inrijden toegestaan vanaf
de zijde van de Melis Stokelaan

Aangepast..
eggie (2021-12-16 10:41:49+00:00): in de Koekangestraat (tussen de Steenwijklaan
en de Coevordenstraat, inrijden toegestaan vanaf de zijde van de Steenwijklaan
Aangepast
eggie (2021-12-16 10:44:50+00:00): Eeldeplantsoen

aangepast
eggie (2021-12-16 10:53:47+00:00): Steenwijklaan (tussen de Dedemsvaartweg en
de Loevesteinlaan, inrijden toegestaan vanaf de zijde van de Leyweg)

Dit heb ik niet verder aangepast, want het klopt dan niet met de luchtfoto. 
Zou uitgezocht kunnen worden.
elsy1 (2021-12-16 10:22:11+00:00): یک مورد دیگر از خرابکاری
MxxCon (2021-12-17 17:58:17+00:00): Hello.
This is clearly a playground and not a schoolyard!
Description for this maproulette challenge state "Schoolyards are often incorrectly tagged as paved playgrounds, even though there’s no playground equipment." Satellite imagery here clearly shows there's playground equipment on site and there's no school attached to it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114997632
elsy1 (2021-12-16 10:21:11+00:00): آزادراه از وسط شهر رد شده را رسم کردید با نامی که وجود واقعی ندارد، لطفا توهمات خودتون را رسم نکنید تا برابر با خرابکاری تلقی نشه و مجبور به ریپورت شما بشویم. اگر اشتباهی صورت گرفته لطفا پاسخ بدهید.
elsy1 (2021-12-16 09:58:32+00:00): اگر پاسخ ندهید ریپورت خواهید شد
marczoutendijk (2021-12-16 12:46:16+00:00): User blocked by DWG:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5540
Cristoffs (2021-12-16 16:08:35+00:00): Cześć! Przybliżysz temat tych analiz? Bo w OSM nie do końca tak mapujemy. Może coś pomóc?
SekeRob (2021-12-16 10:11:21+00:00): Hi, all indoor tagging needs levels, including the entrances such as those of garages, probably the corridors too. ;o)

BTW, There's a warning on this edit as above recorded, an easy way to get feedback on a CS just closed.

ciao
eggie (2021-12-16 10:56:50+00:00): Maar hier heb je juist de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderd?
cycleway=opposite is de 'oude' manier om fietsers uit te zonderen.
Nu routeert het dus niet meer voor fietsers 
Wat bedoel je met de algemene accesstag access=permit???  Voor wie geldt dat? Nu voor iedereen. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 10:59:32+00:00): https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2014-27033.html
eggie (2021-12-16 11:01:42+00:00): Je tagging kan onmogelijk correct zijn. Dit is gewoon openbare weg. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114999560
eggie (2021-12-16 11:07:01+00:00): dat met het parkeren langs beide zijden van de straat de rijbaanbreedte van de Wantsnijders-
gaarde onvoldoende is voor verkeer in twee richtingen, zodat over de gehele straat partieel
eenrichtingsverkeer (eenrichtingsverkeer met uitzondering van fietsers en bromfietsers) wordt
ingesteld in de richting van de Muldersgaarde alsmede dat het bestaande eenrichtingsverkeer
op de Muldersgaarde nu wordt omgedraaid waarmee de verkeersafwikkeling in de omgeving
wordt verbeterd;

,..... aangepast conform verkeersbesluit
eggie (2021-12-16 11:10:30+00:00): De oversteek Erasmusweg is geen oneway=yes
Verplaats je in een verkeersdeelnemer en kijk dat wat de consequestie is van je wijzigingen. 
Check de wijzigingen in de verkeersbesluiten van de Gemeente Den Haag.
eggie (2021-12-16 11:15:26+00:00): dat de rijbaan van de Barbiersgaarde, waar aan twee zijden gedeeltelijk op het trottoir wordt
geparkeerd, onvoldoende breed is voor verkeer in twee richtingen zodat over de gehele straat
partieel eenrichtingsverkeer (eenrichtingsverkeer met uitzondering van fietsers en bromfietsers) wordt ingesteld en tevens een parkeerverbod wordt ingesteld aan de oneven zijde van de straat;
 aangepast
eggie (2021-12-16 15:52:44+00:00): Wellicht is dit een hulp om de juiste tagging voor wegen te vinden.
Het databestand verkeersborden  van de overheid
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.034886307&lng=4.267657399&z=19

Sla de link ergens op. 
Gr eggie
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-01-18 14:55:06+00:00): Hello Nathan,
please, when you draw the building, don't follow the roof position; try to guess where actually are positioned on the ground. A tall building, when a satellite image it's not perfectly vertical, could get shifted di several meters. In Mogadishu someone have shifted the roads to fit the buildings. Now I'm try to fix a lot of things
user_5359 (2021-12-19 08:14:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
pbnoxious (2021-12-16 11:13:47+00:00): Hi, das sieht mir hier sehr nach einem automatisierten Edit aus (zu 10000 (!) Postkästen nur die wikidata:operator und wikipedia:operator tags hinzugefügt, soweit ich das erkennen kann): ich hab dazu keine vorherige Diskussion finden können, wurde das mit der Community abgesprochen?
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Grüße
pbnoxious
Nakaner (2021-12-16 12:52:17+00:00): Hi O_Tkachenko,

please pause this automated edit immediately. It lacks the required discussion with the OSM community in Germany and therefore violates the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. I will revert it soon in order to restore a level playing field for all well-meaning contributors.

Best regards

Michael
O_Tkachenko (2021-12-16 13:00:44+00:00): Hallo, das ist wirklich sehr ähnlich wie der Bot funktioniert, aber alle Bearbeitungen wurden von mir manuell vorgenommen. Wenn Sie sich meine Arbeit ansehen, werden Sie feststellen, dass ich alle Postfächer, die ursprünglich das Netz der Deutschen Post AG betrafen, mit Links zu einem Artikel in Wikipedia und Wikidata dazu an Postbetreiber (wo diese Informationen nicht verfügbar waren) ergänzt habe. Diese arbeit wurde von mir nur, weil das Fehlen dieser unbedeutenden Informationen den OpenStreetMap-Validator erheblich verstopft und stört, dass wirklich große Probleme gefunden werden. Gleichzeitig habe ich kleine von JOSM erkannte Fehler behoben, meistens waren dies Probleme mit dem Format des Wochentags und der Uhrzeit, was auch nicht schlecht ist
Strubbl (2021-12-16 13:35:36+00:00): Hi O_Tkachenko, it would be nice if you could separate the validator fixing edits from the mechanical edit w.r.t. wikidata. This way it is easier for others to understand your changes. A side effect of this is hopefully a smaller changeset area.
pbnoxious (2021-12-16 14:34:30+00:00): Also switching to english for the international community:

Even though you claim to have done all changes "manually", I doubt you have actually reviewed all 10000 post boxes of this edit.
Using an automatized selection tool (such as an overpass query) and then mass-adding the tags does still count as an automatized edit!

While it might be okay to do so under some circumstances, for any large-scale edit in this fashion you should definitely get approval of the community first (read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct , the "Discussion and Document" step should definitely come before doing the edits)
O_Tkachenko (2021-12-16 15:30:02+00:00): I absolutely agree with you, it is impossible to view 10,000 mailboxes, but I assure you that “automatically” I edited only two tags operator: wikipedia and operator: wikidata and only where the postal operator was clearly indicated by Deutsche Post or Deutsche Post AG. Now I understand that I definitely should have consulted in advance, but I was sure that this tiny clarification is non harmful, but definitely useful, for the reasons I indicated above.
Palolo (2022-03-15 00:46:56+00:00): It appears that you added the ref=T8 to the existing linework. Please remove it.
Abou kachongo jr_ImportAccount (2022-03-15 10:08:01+00:00): fixed thanks