piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sorbovit (2024-03-15 09:50:57+00:00): :), ale i tak poprawiłeś tylko połowę tego o czym pisałem.
Mariusz Dykierek (2024-03-15 11:06:21+00:00): A dokładniej gdzie ta niepoprawiona połowa?
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-10-03 13:52:19+00:00): Hello, glad to see someone else editing here in Manhattan. 

There did seem to be a few mistakes in the edit which is fine I certainly made some while starting out. You made an overlapping parking lot in Cisco park, i went ahead and deleted the one with less information the new one you put in had more information which is good. Kimball is a secondary road, primary roads are generally like US highways, even state ones tend to get secondary with the exception of when in urban areas which is why Seth Child is a primary despite being a state route. I went ahead and changed that back. 

I do also just have a question about the construction area marked in CiCo, the county still has it marked as park in the GIS system, and i don't recall seeing any announcement about part of the park being rezoned for commercial construction, though I could have missed this.  I didn't know if you had any information about that.
eggie (2023-04-24 10:21:36+00:00): Dag Geim  Wanneer je foot=use_sidepath bijtagd en je hebt trottoir in de tagging opgenomen met sidewalk=right zal het toch niet routeren. Graag alleen bijtaggen als er een separaat wandelpad staat ingetekend.
Ik heb foot=use_sidepath verwijderd.

HG,
eggie
Geim (2023-04-24 12:21:04+00:00): Maar Eggie, we taggen toch niet voor de router?
eggie (2023-04-24 12:29:44+00:00): Hoi.. In dit geval wel.. want hier heeft de router nog geen oplossing voor.
Je kunt niet op dezelfde way zetten ' Iets mag wel en iets mag niet. '
We willen toch dat de verschillende kaarten blijven routeren?
In Duitsland was een mapper die zo alles op slot zette.
.. cycleway=lane.  Dus bicicle=use_sidepath
Niemand wilde dat alleen hij.

Niets routeerde meer.
Ook zelfde argument. 
Wat dat betreft ben ik liever pragmatisch bezig.
Breng het anders in op het forum.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 12:34:13+00:00): Wanneer je het trottoir apart zou intekenen kan het wel.

Maar hier evt. 
Naast sidewalk= left of right met segregated=yes  foot=yes.. zou een oplossing zijn.
Geim (2023-04-24 12:39:32+00:00): OK, zal vanavond kijken waar ik het nog meer gebruikt heb.
Maar wat is dan het nut nog van sidewalk=right als ik niet mag aangeven dat voetgangers daar gebruik van moeten maken? In mijn  optiek ligt daar dus een pad naast, alleen teken ik hem niet in.
eggie (2023-04-24 12:50:15+00:00): Dat is wel het dilemma. Ik heb overigens wel eens kaart gezien waar dat dan wel rendert... Weet niet meer welke.
Maar als het trottoir rendert staat dat los van de routering. De router ziet het als één way en die zegt dan Niet voor voetgangers.
Het probleem doet zich ook voor bij cycleway=track op de hoofdrijbaan met bicycle=use_sidepath en zelfs no.. geen routering meer.
Mapper was door niemand te overtuigen.

We hebben nu net in heel Nederland de tag vehicle=no verwijderd van de fietspaden 😀 dmv een mechanical edit.
Was ook zo n dingetje.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 12:55:05+00:00): Overigens trekken de bekende routers in osm zich (nog) niets van foot=use_sidepath aan. Het routeert...
Maar dat foot use_sidepath is een vrij nieuwe tag.
Ik wil het wel eens op het forum inbrengen.
eggie (2023-04-24 13:57:52+00:00): Hoi Geim, 
Nog even nagelezen.. 
In de wiki staat het toch ook wel
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Duse_sidepath

..   On OSM, this can be indicated by tagging the main road as foot=use_sidepath if the sidepath is mapped separately.

Groet,
eggie
Geim (2023-04-24 17:00:51+00:00): Vrijwel alle use_sidepaths, waar geen pad getekend is en alleen maar sidewalk=* verwijderd (tenminste die ik heb gedaan en er kunnen her en der nog sommigen rondzwerven)
eggie (2023-04-24 17:05:47+00:00): 👍
Xvtn (2022-10-04 23:52:53+00:00): To make it consistent with tagging for the national chain, The iD editor wants to put name=Smith's, branch=Marketplace - I accepted that suggestion not noticing your recent update until now. I reverted my change back to the way you had it. I know there's something wonky going on between the two Logan Smith's right? One is "marketplace" and one is just Smith's or something like that?
Sytys (2022-10-05 02:38:24+00:00): AFAIK one is much larger with a bigger selection. Specifically different type of Smith's. I added marketplace it to make it more easily searchable
user_1566574 (2022-10-10 19:40:50+00:00): Salut !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7679714383, ça ne serait pas transformer=distribution ?

Désolé & merci ! :)
InfosReseaux (2022-10-10 19:49:01+00:00): Bonsoir !

Hé non : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Proposed_features/Substation_nodes_extension

Ca a changé récemment

Bonne soirée
map per (2023-01-04 12:12:36+00:00): Reverted parts of this edit due to mapping a wrong place classification for Gern without local knowledge
user_2066394 (2022-10-03 15:10:26+00:00): Die Baustelle könnte man noch erfassen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-03 04:59:36+00:00): Privažiavimai prie namų neturi pavadinimų. Ir tai yra privažiavimai, o ne residential gatvės. Mokolų gatvė jau buvo teisingai pažymėta.
DaanLT (2022-10-03 06:11:47+00:00): na ok dėl privažiavimų, bet ten ne visur mokolų g. yra
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-03 06:21:21+00:00): Tai ten niekur nėra Mokolų g. ar kokios kitos gatvės :-) Visur privažiavimai. Na iki mokyklos gali būti bevardis residential (RC jį irgi išskiria, tai, matyt oficialioj klasifikacijoj svarbesnis kelias).
DaanLT (2022-10-03 06:32:56+00:00): jei pagal RC pavadinimus tai taip - nėra, tegu taip ir būna
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-03 06:36:24+00:00): RC matosi, kokie yra visų oficialių gatvių (kuriuos tvarko savivaldybės) vektoriai. Ta pati info bus ir kokiam nors GRPK žemėlapyje. Ir tai atspindi šitų kelių svarbą - reiškia ir priežiūros lygį.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-23 11:56:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10069620325/history - note that in such case it should be brand:wikidata, not wikidata
Diacritic (2022-10-03 04:42:56+00:00): Hello,

The roads at the Spirit of Tasmania carpark do not meet the definition of a primary road.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads

Please consult the tagging guidelines before making a similar change again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126912494
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-03 05:29:09+00:00): Hi, I made the change for two reasons: to make it consistent with the similar features in Devonport;
and the government declared some years ago that the Tasmanian ferry had the status of a national highway, so the entry and exit points for the ferry are part of that highway status.
Diacritic (2022-10-03 05:59:42+00:00): Hey Supt!

I genuinely appreciate the reply. Makes me know that you are still a human. :)

You raise some good points; I don’t believe the National Highway declaration changes the fact these are service roads, but I’ll reach out to others for a second opinion to make sure I’m not off base.

Take care,
Dian
Diacritic (2022-10-03 06:48:46+00:00): Hey Supt,

Based on the conversation on Discord, it’s best we keep these roads as service/in the hierarchy. Also, apparently the Spirit of Tasmania is moving to Geelong during the month?

You’re always welcome to join the conversation: https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
jimkats (2022-10-03 00:02:57+00:00): Ξέχασα να προσθέσω source την Βικιπαίδεια για τις ονομασίες των περιοχών
SBIDWHG (2022-10-03 00:27:30+00:00): DWHG
SBIDWHG (2022-10-03 00:30:34+00:00): dwhg
eggie (2022-10-03 06:29:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-03 22:45:38+00:00): Hello,

Are you sure you have this park in the right place?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099955713

It looks like it's almost entirely covered by the road "Aviation Way".
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-03 22:50:40+00:00): Also, please don't miss this previous comment regarding your changeset comments: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126802942

It's important to actually describe what you have done so other mappers understand your intentions here.
Falsernet (2022-10-03 01:08:54+00:00): ^^^ 'Sankey Brook Navigation' seems to be a relic of the past used in initial development and construction - may better suit project_name.
Emilius123 (2023-06-27 09:56:17+00:00): Hi, could you please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3753530, as it regards your edits here?

Thank you.
Omnific (2023-06-27 15:01:29+00:00): Feel free to correct.
Muhmaker (2022-10-03 07:04:37+00:00): Hi. Erst einmal finde ich grundsätzlich gut, dass du dich um die bessere Erfassung der Wanderwegweiser kümmerst. Ich habe aber ein paar Fragen/Anmerkungen zum dem Projekt. Speziell an dieser Stelle stört mich, dass du Dinge neu einträgst, die "da sein sollten". Thema Nachvollziehbarkeit vor Ort bzw. unklare Quellen auf die du dich beziehst. An anderer Stelle hast du von einem Projekt zur Pflege/Wartung der Wanderwegweiser geschrieben. Bist du dort selbst aktiv eingebunden oder haben die dich beauftragt? Ich gehe doch mal davon aus, dass sie selber eine Art Inventar von ihren (fehlerhaften) Wegweisern haben. Muss das dann wirklich eins-zu-eins in OSM kopiert werden? Gibt es eine Chance, dass die fehlerhaften Wegweiser in absehbarer Zeit ersetzt werden und somit dann (wieder) in OSM auftauchen können? Damit hängen dann auch die Sammel-Relationen direkt zusammen, die du erstellt hast. Die Idee ist zwar nachvollziehbar aber solche Objekte wurden schon öfter in der OSM-Community diskutiert und sind eher unerwünscht. Hier steht besser erklärt warum: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
DeFra85 (2022-10-03 12:01:06+00:00): Hej, ich habe beim TWT nach Datenmaterial bzgl. der Wegweiser gefragt und habe nach etwas Austausch von ihnen Kartenmaterial und GPX-Daten erhalten. Seitdem bin ich zu Fuß und vor allem mit dem Rad/Mountainbike unterwegs. 
Das Projekt ZukunftsFitWandern wurde vor zwei Jahren abgeschlossen und für die Pflege ist seit dem nicht mehr TWT sondern die einzelnen Städte und Gemeinden verantwortlich, die aber maßgeblich mit beteiligt waren.
Manche halten ihr Netzwerk gut in Schuss, anderen fehlt leider die Kapazität (Ehrenamtliche!).
Hier war ich lokal schon mit Verantwortlichen im Austausch und werde hoffentlich dieses Jahr noch mit einsteigen als Wanderwegewart.
Ansonsten melde ich Fehler an Wegweisern oder Routen innerhalb kürzester Zeit den Zuständigen vor Ort.
Die "nicht vorhandenen" Wegweiser habe ich in nächtlicher Umwanderung hinzugefügt, da bin ich ganz deiner Meinung.
Das mit der Netzwerk-Relation finde ich einen guten Hinweis, da muss ich nochmal grübeln. Wie könnte man das denn sonst machen, das man gleich sieht oder mit entsprechenden Werkzeugen herausfindet das die zusammen gehören?
Wie ich unsere Behörden kenne haben die nur Karten und Zettelwirtschaft. Aber das werde ich ja bald sehen.
Muhmaker (2022-10-03 16:27:01+00:00): Dann viel Erfolg bei dem Versuch dort mal Schwung in den Laden zu bringen ;) Ja ich kenne die Problematik mit den Ehrenamtlichen auch aus Erzählungen von Bekannten und hatte auch selber Kontakt zu einem Wegebetreuer vom Sennestadtverein. Das kann dann auch mal ein paar Monate dauern bis sie das machen was man vorschlägt ;)
Um den IST-Zustand der erfassten Wegweiser in OSM darstellen zu können gibt es das Tool Overpass-Turbo. Eine sehr mächtige und leider auch komplizierte Skript-Sprache zum Abfragen der Datenbank. Hier ist ein Beispiel für die Wanderwegweiser in Bielefeld: 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mpe
Du müsstest dann noch links oben auf Ausführen klicken. Dann werden sie angezeigt. Du kannst dann auch in Zeile 7 den Ort ändern. Musst vielleicht etwas herumprobieren mit der Schreibweise wenn du die Städte mit (Westf.) im Namen probieren willst. Man kann auch nur in einem kleinen Ausschnitt der Karte suchen lassen. Dazu müsstest man dann Zeile 7 mit zwei // am Anfang auskommentieren und in Zeile 11 den Ausdruck {{bbox}} in die runden Klammern am Ende der Zeile schreiben. Es gibt im Netz theoretisch auch eine Dokumentation dazu. Aber das ist kaum zu verstehen. Ich google immer nach Beispielen und baue mir die dann so um wie ich sie brauche. Die dringensten Fälle für dein Anliegen sollten aber mit den obigen Hinweisen erst mal funktionieren. Wenn du eine Karte von einem idealen SOLL-Zustand bauen möchtest kannst du dir vielleicht mal dieses Projekt anschauen: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/ Damit soll man angeblich auf einer OSM-Hintergrundkarte alle nur denkbaren Markierungen und Hervorhebungen selber setzen können um sie dann auch veröffentlichen zu können. Ich habe aber keine Erfahrung damit und kann nicht sagen wie gut das funktioniert oder wie kompliziert das ist.
DeFra85 (2022-10-14 18:11:38+00:00): OMG, da braucht man ja ein Informatik Studium xD
... aber das (Westf.) muss man einfach ausschreiben und die Klammern weglassen, cool! Das hätte ich niemals oder nur nach stundenlangem Tüfteln hinbekommen.
Alle Wegweiser findet man ja wenn man ["hiking"="yes"] entfernt. Kann man auch [bicycle=yes] als Ausschlusskriterium festlegen?

Ansonsten finde ich https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org echt hilfreich. Dort werden auch die direction_xyz der Wegweiser richtig angezeigt
Muhmaker (2022-10-14 20:10:15+00:00): Bin mir nicht genau sicher ob du das meinst. Aber mit ["information"="guidepost"][!"bicycle"] werden alle Wegweiser gefunden, die keinen bicycle-Schlüssel haben. Konkret bicycle=yes ausschließen habe ich auf die Schnelle nicht hinbekommen.
DeFra85 (2022-10-14 20:56:42+00:00): SUPER
oba510 (2022-10-03 12:21:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

On-street parking is one of the more complicated things to map.  If you want to map a parking lane there are a couple of ways to do it.  You can add parking:lane:left and/or parking:lane:right tags (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane ) to the existing way representing the street.
Alternatively, you can draw a single rectangle around all of the spaces and tag it with amenity=parking and parking=lane (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dlane ).

To map individual parking spaces there's:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Normally you would want to add the access restriction under the access=* tag.  "Nobel Laureate only" is such a vanishingly rare type of restriction that there's no tag for it, so access=private along with something relevant under the description or name tag would probably be best for now.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:10+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:18+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:21+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:23+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:25+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:27+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:29+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-03 03:13:32+00:00): I forgot to switch accounts in JOSM: I have not got paid at all for this, it is just hobby edit

sorry for a confusion
volga_shibe (2022-10-03 03:11:48+00:00): I have no idea why the changset says it's so big
Diacritic (2022-10-03 04:59:20+00:00): Hi Volga Shibe,

Thanks for your edits to the local area!

I've made a couple of minor adjustments to this intersection. I've shortened the length of the slip lanes to diverge closer to the actual point of physical separation. It's best practice to use the turn=* and change=* tags to indicate where there is an extra turning lane in those instances.

I've also added oneway tags to the segments inside the dual carriageway intersection, and changed the segments to match the roads around it. It's generally best to keep the road as the same classification as it passes through a major road, and data consumers can use the abstract representation of the intersection to adjust routing accordingly.

I hope this makes sense! Happy to help out further if required. :)

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126914792
volga_shibe (2022-10-03 21:34:06+00:00): ok thanks! I'm still learning the tag system :)
Diacritic (2022-10-03 21:42:24+00:00): No problem at all. Your edits, from what I have seen, have been generally quite good so keep editing! :)

If you're a social person, I'd encourage you to check out the mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-au) or the discord (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap). 

Both are great places to ask questions and meet people, and they helped me out a lot. :)
volga_shibe (2022-10-03 23:49:36+00:00): thanks, i'm already in the discord (your next door neighbor) and i'll check out the mailing list :)
Frans S (2022-10-15 10:56:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126915033
Aarogya Pandey (2024-01-27 15:58:21+00:00): noted with thanks
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:55:08+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:56:17+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126915277
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:56:59+00:00): Hi.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Chris-Ding (2022-10-03 06:19:40+00:00): Hello,

Thank you, sorry didn't know there was a dev server. Will use that instead.

Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:56:26+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126915231
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-07 10:38:31+00:00): Hello. 
Also, here no tags added and squared.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126915369
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.