piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2019-09-05 19:13:32+00:00): Hallo Sakine!

Ich glaube, Du solltest bei Deinen Edits ein wenig mehr Konzentration walten lassen...

Jetzt haben wir hier zweimal den gleichen Hofladen, wobei einer davon mit der Gebäudewand verbunden ist, was beides nicht sein sollte.

Falls Du Hilfe benötigst, melde Dich gern.

Gruss aus HB!
Sakine (2019-09-05 20:01:27+00:00): Oh Verzeihung! Ich gelobe Besserung! Danke für das Unterstützungsangebot. Ggf. komme ich darauf zurück.
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-05 20:49:14+00:00): hello, can you explain why you added a path when the levada is already mapped?
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
TourenbikerFKB (2019-09-07 21:19:15+00:00): Hallo Auenberg, tracktype=grade1 und surface=ground paßt nicht zusammen. Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
TourenbikerFKB (2019-09-07 21:19:41+00:00): betr. way 333035027
Auenberg (2019-09-08 11:19:01+00:00): Hallo TourenbikerFKB, hab's geändert. Danke
muralito (2019-09-05 22:21:44+00:00): Hola.

Por lo que se ve en la imagen aerea creo que se clasifican mejor como "footway" que como "pedestrian".

Ademas tenes que unirle los nodos del extremo a Prefectura Naval Argentina, sino es como que ese extremo esta aislado del resto de la vialidad.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-30 17:15:03+00:00): Hallo st1974,

kann es sein, dass hier ein duplizierter Weg sich ins CS geschlichen hat?

Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722327397 ist doppelt (er gibt schon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8170604).

D. h. in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10004900 den Weg 722327397 durch 8170604 ersetzen und Weg 722327397 dann löschen? Übersehe ich was?

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
st1974 (2021-07-31 19:09:45+00:00): Ja, das muss beim Erstellen der Multipolygone passiert sein. Ich habe in Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108954533
den duplizierten Weg gelöscht und die Multipolygon-Definition entsprechend geändert.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-31 19:13:39+00:00): besten dank dir 👍
Andre68 (2019-09-05 20:42:13+00:00): Yeah! That's it! Looks great now! Thank you!
MapMakerGal (2019-09-05 21:08:11+00:00): Thanks to you :)
rayleigh1 (2019-09-05 19:52:00+00:00): Edycje usunęły przypadkowo kilka tagów, gdy będę miał czas to je dodam z powrotem
glibbertorsten (2019-09-06 05:27:21+00:00): Hallo. Der Versuch ,Eigennamen falsch zu schreiben ist dir gelungen. Korrigierst du die Namen wieder?
streckenkundler (2019-09-06 06:29:42+00:00): Diese Knoten sollten meiner Ansicht nach ganz eliminiert werden. Sie gaukeln einen Ort vor, den es so nicht gibt. Die relevanten Informationen des Punktes gehört an die Relation. Auch von rolle label halte ich nicht viel.
user_5359 (2019-09-06 04:29:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You use 'House' for the name, but it is a description (also describe by key building).
But I must revert your entry because you paint over existing buildings!
user_5359 (2019-09-06 04:57:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=farmland. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2019-09-06 04:12:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have update your entries (only name and description, no useful information like address and contacts) with business information. 
If you need help: You are welcome.
!bm (2019-09-06 13:48:40+00:00): Hallo! Was meinst du mit "kein covered"? covered=no? --bestegrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74150234
CaptainCrunch (2019-09-24 17:44:07+00:00): Hier gibt es das gleiche Problem wie bei deinen anderen "Elemente dem Satellitenbild angepasst"-Changesets: es ist falsch! Bitte mach das selbst wieder rückgängig (JOSM mit reverter-Plugin o.ä.). Sag Bescheid wenn du Hilfe brauchst, ich weiß nicht ob das in iD geht.
Ist dir nicht aufgefallen, dass vorher alles schön gleichmäßig war und die Straßen jetzt komische Knicke haben?
conorsh (2019-09-05 21:02:20+00:00): Site plan available here:
https://www.ashwoodhomes.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/donington-site-plan-handout.pdf

I will confirm road names next time I take a stroll down. :)
eggie (2019-09-05 22:10:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner (2019-10-24 20:24:42+00:00): Hallo,

du hast im Bereich der ehemaligen Haltestelle Mendelssohnplatz die Gleise um ca. 1 Meter nach Osten verschoben. Ändert sich dort tatsächlich die Gleislage? Glaubst du, den Bebauungsplan gut genug ausgerichtet zu haben?

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-10-24 21:05:41+00:00): Der kleine Schwenk ist auch vor Ort gut sichtbar.
Nakaner (2019-10-24 21:11:53+00:00): Hallo,

danke für deine Antwort. Das muss ich mir wohl nochmal vor Ort demnächst ansehen. Ich war zwar heute Abend dort und habe die Fußwege und Fahrbahnen überarbeitet. Die Gleise habe ich mir noch grob angeschaut (Motto: ist ja bloß ein Gleisviereck).

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-10-24 21:42:22+00:00): Hmmm ... Die beiden daraus resultierenden Changesets sind etwas suboptimal ...
Die Fußweg-Querung der Rüppurrer hatte bspw. schon die endgültige Geometrie, wie sie evtl. in paar Tagen oder etwas später in Betrieb gehen dürfte,
Nakaner (2019-10-24 22:04:51+00:00): Ich kann mir das nochmal anschauen, aber ich hatte vor Ort auf die Stellen geachtet, wo der "Bahnsteig-Bordstein" am stärksten abgesenkt ist. Der Mast der neuen Behelfsample der Rüpurrer Straße Richtung Ludwig-Erhard-Allee steht ja recht nahe an der Kriegsstraße und die Fußgängerfurt läuft in meinen Augen recht gerade (wie die letzten Jahre) vom Scheck-in-Center aus über die Rüppurrer Straße.

Da die Stelle mit Vespucci grausam zu bearbeiten ist (Neuordnung der Geometrie und aller Kreuzungen mit den Gleisen), habe ich das erst daheim mit JOSM gemacht. Ich möchte nicht darauf schwören, dass meine Änderungen der Wahrheit entspricht. (Fotos habe ich keine gemacht, nur Erinnerung im Kopf)
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-10-27 12:12:43+00:00): Hab's mir Fr. auch noch mal angeschaut, da im Rahmen von FFF dran vorbeigekommen und danach noch mal einen Abstecher. Die Furt macht wirklich den von mir nach Plan (Stand 12/18) gemappten Versatz und Bilder und Plan passen m.E. gut zusammen bzgl. Furt über Westfahrbahn und Gleise. Es kann lediglich sein, dass der Versatz über die Ostfahrbahn etwas geringer ausgefallen ist als nach Plan, man wird's eines Tages anhand neuer Luftbilder sehen ... Der Plan ist ja eh nur "nach Gefühl" übertragen im Vergleich alt/neu und Original-B-Plan/Update 12/18, alt ist ja im Plan im Hintergrund und in Luftbildern tw. noch zu erkennen ...
Nakaner (2019-10-28 18:11:53+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die Kreuzung vorher nach Ortsbesichtigung erneut angefasst. Meine Erinnerung war doch korrekt. Die Fußwegführung Ost–West über das nördliche Ende der Haltestelle Rüppurrer Tor hinweg ist relativ geradlinig, denn gerade dort sind Bordsteine der Bahnsteige gleisseitig am tiefsten abgesenkt. Wenige Meter weiter südlich sind sie ca. 4 cm hoch (höher als bei neu gebauten Übergängen heutzutage in Karlsruhe aus Barrierefreiheitsgründen üblich), noch weiter südlich beginnt die 34 cm hohe Bahnsteigkante. Gerne kann ich dir Fotos zukommen lassen.

Den Gleisschwenk kann ich jetzt bestätigen, ich habe ihn gesehen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-10-29 12:26:43+00:00): Bilder brauche ich keine, habe meine eigenen ... Auf denen sehe ich, dass die Furt lotrecht zur Rüppurrer Str. ist und nicht parallel zur Kriegsstr. (der Winkel zwischen den beiden ist etwas kleiner als 90°) und dass die Furt auf der östlichen Fahrbahn leicht nach Norden versetzt ist, weil die Furt sonst zu weit nach Süden kommt wegen des besagten Winkels ... Man erkennt es auch daran, dass beim östlichen Bahnsteig die geriffelten Blindenleitplatten zu den beiden Furten (warum die grau statt weiß sind wie üblich, keine Ahnung) und auch die etwas breiteren Absenkungen sich nicht genau gegenüber liegen.
aharvey (2019-09-06 06:11:37+00:00): It looks like you've changed building=retail to building=yes, if these are shop buildings, then building=retail would be better. Did you want to change it back?
aharvey (2019-09-08 13:09:13+00:00): I didn't hear back yet, so I've gone ahead and restored these
user_115918 (2019-09-08 17:03:25+00:00): The take that iD takes on setting amenity and office types on buildings is to set building=yes. Office or amenity becomes the description. In the case of a building=retail and office=tax_advisor those actively conflict. It's not a retail building. It's a tax office. You're free to revert it if you care, but any new buildings of these same type won't get tagged that way.
skquinn (2022-08-27 20:19:19+00:00): Many of these H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, etc tax advisor offices are in retail buildings in retail shopping centers. Just because it's being used as a tax advisor office does not change that it's a retail building.
user_5359 (2019-09-06 03:57:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object, please have a loo on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstudio
4004 (2019-09-08 19:11:14+00:00): по врублевского вроде? а на доме что?
AlehKan (2019-09-09 04:02:31+00:00): Врублевского 43Б, это детский сад.
AlehKan (2019-09-09 04:05:05+00:00): Рядом Врублевского 43, Врублевского 43А... раньше был адрес Курчатова 17, а сейчас стал Врублевского 43Б.
AlehKan (2019-09-09 04:05:52+00:00): На самом садике таблички с номером дома нет.
AlehKan (2019-09-09 04:07:08+00:00): Мы заключали с ними договор по пожарной сигнализации и в документах фигурирует не Курчатова 17, а Врублевского 43Б.
4004 (2019-09-09 07:11:51+00:00): Понятно, спасибо, поправлю потом и полигон
viloan (2019-09-05 22:20:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
michalfabik (2019-09-06 06:33:18+00:00): Pozdrav, pretpostavljam da naziv firme nije "Used car dealership". Treba dodati "second_hand=only" uz "shop=car", te u tag name=* popuniti pravi naziv firme.  
Vidi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar#Tags_used_in_combination
GSVB (2019-09-06 15:49:37+00:00): updated, thx
gscholz (2019-11-10 09:17:36+00:00): Hi Unicorn,
as you are a regular mapper in the Mexico region and also an author of one or another error in the osm database regarding not connected ways like this changeset, I like to invite you to help fixing the unconnected ways in Mexico. As you know missing connections prevent routing software from working properly. This OSMI view gives an impression of the current situation:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-102.76754&lat=20.83334&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1

Would you like to join me fixing these errors?
Guido
Unicorn Ostrich (2019-11-11 23:25:43+00:00): Hello Guido, 

Thank you for bringing these issues to my attention. I have fixed both changesets you mentioned and have corrected many of the most pressing errors in the region using the tool you introduced me to. I anticipate reviewing this tool a few more times to ensure the situation has been adequately addressed. Thank you for your comment and for being a part of OSM!

Cheers,
Unicorn Ostrich
Burisma (2019-09-12 17:41:24+00:00): You are a legendary contributor, and still not using changeset comments ;)
hvalentim (2019-09-06 09:02:02+00:00): shop=musical_instrument é o tag correcto, porém não exibido no openstreetmap.org.
Não obstante, como a escola de música também parece vender instrumentos, acrescer shop=musical_instrument permite exibir o ícone desta última categoria, expressivo q.b.
hvalentim (2019-09-06 09:10:12+00:00): Queria-se escrever : amenity=music_school é o tag correcto, porém não exibido no openstreetmap.org. 
Não obstante, como a escola de música também parece vender instrumentos, acrescer shop=musical_instrument permite exibir o ícone desta última categoria, expressivo q.b.
EdLoach (2019-09-06 18:05:52+00:00): You're confusing routes and route variants. I now have three route variants to restore as the route has 5 variants, not the two you've left.
Sammyhawkrad (2019-09-06 17:32:00+00:00): My other comment holds for this changeset too. Please do well to revert the names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74152978
Sammyhawkrad (2019-09-06 17:30:03+00:00): Hello Jaysongz, the bus sop information you changed was from an 'official' survey AccraMobile3 Project and the names have been confirm as valid for the whole of Accra so I'll advise you change the Flat top back to Fly Top. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74152992
ivanatora (2019-10-06 15:08:30+00:00): Roads stretching east of Ravnogor are not service, they are most definitely highway=track by usage and surface
hayes9 (2019-10-08 16:19:19+00:00): Thank you for updating based on local survey.
gscscnd (2019-09-06 06:56:57+00:00): 1. Nazwa szkoły powinna być na linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534099016, a nie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548544631.
2. Tag denomination wymaga tagu religion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382134518).
3. Niekompletny adres: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6775859544.
deg-pl (2019-09-06 08:18:54+00:00): 1) Dlaczego? Widzę, że są różne podejścia i niezbyt rozumiem, dlaczego teren, a nie budynek oznaczać jako szkoła.
2) Zmieniłem tylko building=church na building=chapel, innych tagów nie zmieniałem, więc pewnie problem istniał wcześniej.
3) Wiem. Niestety nie znam kompletnego adresu.
gscscnd (2019-09-06 08:27:28+00:00): 1. Szkoła­‑teren zawiera budynki, boiska, parkingi itp. Szkoła­‑budynek to sam budynek. Oczywiście budynek (budynki) jest najważniejszym elementem szkoły, ale nie jedynym. W Polsce mamy 12785 building=school, w tym 30 % posiada tag name. Mamy też 14742 amenity=school, w tym 77 % posiada tag name.
2. Być może edytor zmienił coś za Ciebie. Tagi building, denomination i name nie zmieniły się w tym zestawie zmian, a amenity i religion zostały usunięte.
deg-pl (2019-09-06 08:29:29+00:00): Widziałem, że szkołę poprawiłeś.
Religion dodałem
gscscnd (2019-09-06 08:32:17+00:00): Szkoły nie ruszałem (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/534099016), dodałem tylko informacje o chodnikach (https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74159723) i zmieniłem tagowanie przystanku (https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74159775).
gscscnd (2019-09-06 07:00:29+00:00): Co to jest crossing=marked? Dlaczego jest lepszy niż crossing=traffic_signals lub crossing=uncontrolled?
deg-pl (2019-09-06 08:14:28+00:00): crossing=marked to oznakowane przejście dla pieszych (zebra). unmarked (tak było) to nieoznakowane przejście, czyli bez "zebry".
gscscnd (2019-09-06 08:34:44+00:00): W tym zestawie zmian nie było żadnego przejścia „unmarked”.

Tag crossing=marked jest opisany w propozycji https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dmarked, jeszcze nie zaakceptowanej. Czepiam się o to samo, o co czepiał się (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/crossing%3Dmarked#Proposed_information_loss) Mateusz Konieczny — że zmiana crossing=uncontrolled na crossing=marked powoduje utratę informacji o tym, że na przejściu nie ma sygnalizacji świetlnej (podobnie jak zmiana crossing=traffic_signals na marked powoduje utratę informacji o tym, że taka sygnalizacja jest). Zobacz wizualizację Twojego zestawu zmian: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74153288
deg-pl (2019-09-06 09:47:57+00:00): To niezbyt rozumiem, czemu w edytorze są propozycje, a nie zaakceptowane tagi.

Edytor sam z resztą sugeruje, że np crossing=zebra jest przestarzałe i należy zmienić na... crossing=marked.
gscscnd (2019-09-06 09:51:40+00:00): O kontrowersjach związanych z tym edytorem jest cały artykuł na Wiki: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions#Changing_crossing.3Dzebra_to_crossing.3Dmarked>.
gscscnd (2019-09-06 09:54:09+00:00): …i wątek na forum: <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66418>.
BCNorwich (2019-09-06 07:07:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are the car clinic repairs actually carried out here or is this just an office? Or are you part of this organisation :- https://www.carclinic.org.uk/  ?
If the answer is yes then this is not a car repair premises, not even an official office. This is then unverifiable data and is unfortunately not acceptable to OSM.

Regards Bernard.
InsertUser (2019-09-10 22:58:29+00:00): Can you confirm your source for this usage?
viloan (2019-09-06 00:50:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
alester (2019-09-06 05:18:04+00:00): Google Earth isn't allowed for editing. Please revert this changeset immediately to remove any data that doesn't comply with the ODbL license
MelioraCogito (2019-09-13 04:15:06+00:00): 1.  I DID NOT use GE to "EDIT" anything.  I used it as a visual source & collected some (untrused) coordinate/measurements info to import into AutoCAD Civil 3D whereupon I used that data to "best approximate" the parking layout.  Normally I would have used VicMap, but the aerial/satellite imagery is two years dated (2017) for this site and the parking lot had not been laid out at that time.

What was imported into OSM was Civil 3D coord data, NOT GE data.  I used GE as a rough source, nothing more. There is absolutely NO direct data transferred from GE to OSM in this regard.  I merely gave GE credit as a source to be thorough in my source list (something I’m far more forthcoming with than you appear to be, noting the distinct absence of any source citations to a shit-load of data you’ve placed on the map).

So if I've errored in citing GE (which I will now avoid in future), be assured NO GE DATA WAS IMPORTED DIRECTLY INTO OSM, ergo no ODbL license infringement was made.

2. I've asked you before, if you need to get my attention on an edit I’ve made that you're concerned about, PM me through the OSM user account messaging system. PLEASE DO NOT USE THESE MEANS.

I don't believe for one GDF minute you're not logged into OSM when you’re checking edits and therefore aren't able to go to the user page of the offending user, and PM them there as well, when you see something that offends you.  Doing so alerts me when I run JOSM that someone wants my attention sooner than I may otherwise discover (like a month later) when I do check my e-mail. 

I told you before, I DO NOT check my e-mail regularly, sometimes a month will go by before I do, which means I don’t see your comments/concerns until weeks after you’ve issued them, which makes you think I’m ignoring you, which I AM NOT deliberately trying to do.  But you are forcing the issue by ignoring my request to be contacted via OSM’s other means so that I may address your "issues" more promptly and to your satisfaction.(openstreetmap.org/user/MelioraCogito)

...and I'm NOT interested in reading someone else's reply, who jump into this exchange on your defence.
freebeer (2019-09-13 13:55:55+00:00): first, never use google mapping products in any way for osm mapping.  lose them from your source.  punkt.  aus.

second, changeset comments are the preferred public way to report and discuss your edits.  what goes out-of-sight is invisible to me and dozens of other users who have nothing better to do than make sure you and thousands of other users actually stick to the rules.
MelioraCogito (2019-09-16 06:21:25+00:00): Once again... some unknown JA jumps in to poor alester's def.  Pathetic.

1. Understood – GE ist verboten! Period. (Won't make that mistake again.)
2. Mind you, it seems even some of the "rule keepers" don't actually know the f'n "rules" themselves... (imagine that).
3. If you have any influence with the powers that be at OSM, then may I suggest you do what you can to persuade them to write some added routine within this changeset review scheme which will notify users in JOSM that someone has an issue with their edits rather than relying entirely on people having to check their e-mail every 10 minutes.

I'm not asking for a private comms channel, I am asking for an ALTERNATE MEANS OF CONTACT when there is an issue that needs my (or anyone else's) attention.

This isn't rocket science. A SIMPLE user notification routine integrated within this changeset review system is all that's needed... one that flag's users in JOSM (or any other OSM approved editor) that some OC is having a fit over some edit that was made, just as users are alerted in JOSM to account PMs.

I'll say this again: I DO NOT CHECK MY E-MAIL ON A REGULAR BASIS and I'm sure as hell not about to start doing so. 

What part of that statement DO YOU NOT understand?!?
richlv (2019-09-25 08:59:34+00:00): Everybody, please take a moment away from the keyboard.
Let's keep things civil and polite.