piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mr_Brown (2019-01-03 17:53:12+00:00): I have removed the incomplete addresses. Hopefully this should clean up the errors a little. See changeset # 65996923.
chachafish (2019-01-03 18:09:50+00:00): Thanks :) I did a bunch of searching online at the city's official website, but didn't find anything. I'll keep looking. Cheers ;)
Glassman (2018-12-28 03:07:31+00:00): This looks more like a playground than a park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65823006
Glassman (2018-12-28 03:10:09+00:00): I think you want highway=trailhead but it really only used for an area to park and to pay fees. Residential areas really don't have trailheads like you are showing here. Just connect the trail to the street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65823540
prq9218 (2018-12-30 18:42:18+00:00): Got it, thanks for the info.  Would it make sense to use guidepost?  Just looked at the Chehalis Western and some of the trailheads have those as points.
eggie (2018-12-27 21:11:16+00:00): Oke... Dan heb ik net dat andere stukje gepakt. Het lijkt me nu allemaal correct zo.
HG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-27 20:23:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-27 20:31:23+00:00): Dag jansebas Iets is een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat. G13, G11 of G12a
Iets is een wandelpad als er het bekende blauwe bord met de wandelaar staat. Wanneer er geen bord staat taggen we highway=path. Dat is ook toegankelijk voor fietsers.
Moet dit dan niet gewoon highway=path zijn?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-27 20:48:00+00:00): Waarschijnlijk dus ook highway=path  met surface=paved Fietsen zal zijn toegestaan.
bicycle is default op een path. 
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-27 20:46:06+00:00): Dag jansebas.. Ook wellicht een highway=path en dan vehicle=no en horse=no ? 
MVG,
Eggie
letihu (2019-02-14 11:30:46+00:00): Geht dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658563911/history
einfach so durch dieses
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436226272/history#map=19/50.75495/12.60045&layers=N
Wasser?
Lothar2 (2019-02-14 18:33:37+00:00): Ja, das Wasser ist nicht Permanent. Es handelt sich eher um grosse Pfützen als ein echtes Gewässer.
 Komme derzeit dort aber nicht vorbei um die aktuelle Lage zu erkunden.
eggie (2018-12-27 20:34:45+00:00): Je net aangelegde wandelpad heeft volgens mij geen verbinding met dat pad bij het bruggetje. Het zal dan niet routeren. Het zit wel vastgeplakt aan de landuse grass. 
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-27 21:03:09+00:00): Het pad langs de molengang heb ik goed gelegd, want nu liep het dwars door het akkerland. Het zit nu niet meer geplakt aan het gras en heeft een verbinding met de parkeerplaats.
Gebruik als achtergrond de pdok afbeelding 25cm. Je kunt daar voor kiezen in de verschillende achtergronden.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
jansebas (2018-12-29 20:49:30+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Bedankt voor het welkom, de kritische vragen en de correctie t.a.v. het pad bij de molenviergang.
Wat betreft de vragen over de niet-fiets-, maar voetpaden in Haalderen/Bemmel het volgende:
De Oude Kasteellaan heeft een bord C01, verboden voor alle verkeer dus. De andere stukjes (en er zijn er nog meer in deze wijk} komen, gezien de bestrating overeen met de tegelbestrating zoals die in heel Bemmel gebruikt wordt op trottoirs.
Wel vormen ze verbindingsstukjes die ook fietsers uitnodigen er gebruik van te maken.
Met vriendelijke groet, 
jansebas
eggie (2018-12-30 00:03:23+00:00): Oke.. dan zou ik de verbinding taggen als highway=path met surface=paved. Dan routeert het ook voor fietsers. En bij het c01 bord.. highway=path..vehicle=no en horse=no.. Je mag er immers wandelen.

Succes..
Eggie
Glassman (2018-12-28 03:16:03+00:00): I corrected some of the problems. Let me know if you need any help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65823915
ianlopez1115 (2019-01-04 15:22:34+00:00): Looks okay but next time do not connect park polygon to street/highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65824191
chachafish (2019-03-13 06:28:49+00:00): Hola, disculpe la molestia, pero que es este? Gracias :)
Way: 658570094
Rich1234 (2018-12-27 20:54:01+00:00): The outer baseball diamond way in your changeset that is closest to the intersection of Washington Blvd. and N. Quincy St. has no tags, and appears to not be part of a relation.  So it seems to be completely untagged.
mueschel (2018-12-29 14:00:58+00:00): Please make sure you don't add your internal "telenav" tags to OSM.
Sherbare_import (2018-12-31 17:08:50+00:00): Thank you for catching this, I will work harder to make sure this does not happen again.
eggie (2018-12-28 07:48:17+00:00): Motor_vehicle = no hoort echt niet op een fietspad. Ik heb het weer verwijderd. 
Wanneer Flitzmeister auto's stuurt over fietspaden kun je wellicht beter contact opnemen met die "router". 
MVG,
Eggie
skorpion62 (2019-09-30 09:47:32+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

wie kommst Du darauf, dass hier ein Tunnel ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658581266

Warum fehlt sehr oft nach einer Änderung, die Du an einem Weg vorgenommen hast, z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658581265/history danach die gesamte Historie? 

Viele Grüße
skorpion62
skorpion62 (2019-11-03 17:03:34+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

da Du Dich nach über einen Monat, obwohl Du online warst, nicht auf meine Anfrage gemeldet hast, wie Du darauf kommst, dass hier ein Tunnel ist, werde ich den Weg wieder zurück korrigieren und den Tunnel löschen. Warum informierst Du Dich nicht vor Ort, denn nur so kannst Du sehen, dass das nur eine Brücke ist, die über den Weg führt. 

Viele Grüße 
skorpion62
NGL-engel (2019-11-04 12:03:29+00:00): ok
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-11-22 09:28:18+00:00): Hei Christian. Ser at du tegnet inn gangruting inne i Lagunen kjøpesenter - men - gangveiene er ikke koblet sammen med utsiden. Dette fører til en "routing island" der man får ruting inne i senteret men man kommer seg ikke ut av bygget. Klarer du å komplettere disse indoor-gangveiene med kobling til fortauer etc. på utsiden? Veldig gjerne så fort som mulig da dette bland annet gir problemer ved søk til og fra kjøpesenteret i Skyss og Entur sine reiseplanleggere.
eggie (2018-12-28 07:24:03+00:00): Probeer svp concreet aan te geven wat je doet. Dus unclassified veranderd in residential road. 
Is dit geen doorgaande weg dan?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-28 07:35:59+00:00): Hoi Jmm   Ik heb dit stukje weg weer teruggezet naar unclassified. Het is anders wat onlogisch als het vervolg ervoor en erna gewoon unclassified is.
In de regel is het zo dat doorgaande straten unclassified zijn en de binnenstraten door de wijkjes residential of soms living_street.
De routering houdt hier rekening mee. 
MVG,
Eggie
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-28 03:17:25+00:00): If it's fast food, then it should be amenity=fast_food.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65825776
PT-53 (2019-08-04 09:39:35+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
in keep right wird für diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/303381683/history
ein Hinweis fehlende Tags, Node 303381683 angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=108077077
Stellt der Knoten den Verein MTG Wangen dar?
Müßte sich der Knoten dann nicht innerhalb der Lothar-Weiß-Halle befinden (offizielle Adresse des MTG)?
Fragende Grüße
Geofreund1 (2019-08-04 12:01:57+00:00): MTG als Club eingetragen, Gebäude als sports_hall getaggt und "Sportinsel" als loc_name hinzugefügt.
mueschel (2021-01-04 13:27:54+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this tag?
It's not used in other places.
collection_times_1 = CP1D

Thanks!
manof25 (2021-01-04 20:55:09+00:00): Hi,
I have gone on OSM to the node for the postbox in question and I have corrected the format to collection_plate.
Thanks.
eggie (2018-12-28 07:18:21+00:00): Dag Harmen... Het heeft weinig zin bij talloze wegen te vermelden dat er geen fietspad langs loopt. AddCycleway is niet zo geschikt voor de Nederlandse infrastructuur. 
Probeer ook het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden. 
MVG,
Eggie
harmenhuizinga (2018-12-28 13:17:50+00:00): Hoi, Had de app streetcomplete geinstalleerd en ben daar wat mee aan de slag gegaan, maar fietspaden hebben dus geen zin begrijp ik. Zal dat achterwege laten.
eggie (2018-12-28 13:40:00+00:00): Oke Harmen... Je kunt evt. als je daar aan toe bent ook mappen met een reguliere editor als JOSM (aanbevolen vanuit het forum)
Met streetcomplete kan weinig fout maar met die fietspaden dus juist weer wel.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710  

Vrijliggende fietspaden worden als volgt getagd.
     G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

.. en wanneer er geen fietspad is taggen we niets.

Succes verder,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-28 07:10:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
gurglypipe (2018-12-28 00:06:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. It looks like you mistakenly merged a bus stop (‘naptan’) node with the fire station in this edit. I’ve tidied that up in this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65827973. I also straightened the walls of the health centre — you can do this in the ID editor by pressing ‘s’ (for ‘square’) when an area is selected. Happy editing. :-)
Bodian (2018-12-28 09:45:54+00:00): Super - thanks.  Yes, the symbols are quite small, and I hadn't realised this was a bus stop and thought the fire station had been duplicated.  Thanks for this.  I'll remember the square tip (hopefully).
gurglypipe (2018-12-28 16:36:04+00:00): One question — what do you mean by ‘No_Bridge_Across_Railway’ at the end of Berners Close? How does the footpath get over the railway, or is there no legal way through at all? Ta.
Bodian (2018-12-28 17:02:45+00:00): There's a legal right of way over the bridge onto the promenade (public footpath).  However, they have taken the bridge away - so there's no physical way to walk over the railway at the moment.  The same is true of the Bailey Lane level crossing which has been locked closed for about three years now.  But I didn't know how to show this except with another barrier point?
gurglypipe (2018-12-28 17:12:06+00:00): Interesting. I think that’s best handled by leaving the footpath in place, and marking that segment of it as a bridge, but then annotating it with a lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to indicate it’s removed. I’ve done that here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65847563. Please edit it further if you think I’ve done something wrong there.
gurglypipe (2018-12-28 17:13:41+00:00): It looks like someone’s edited the level crossing 9 months ago to mark it as access=no, which indicates nobody (bicycles, pedestrians, or vehicles) is allowed to use it. I think that’s appropriate tagging for what you describe. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571093116
Bodian (2018-12-28 17:18:39+00:00): Gosh, it's all more complicated than I thought!  Thanks ever so much for the training.  I'll edit the cycle routes to show some as cycle paths that also have walkers (the Walney to Wear route), and some as foot paths that also allow cyclists (like Clare House Lane and other connections) to reflect what's on the ground and happens.

How do you record a 'Restricted Byway'?
gurglypipe (2018-12-28 17:25:41+00:00): Heh, no worries. You can find documentation on most conventions on the wiki if you need it. Otherwise, just go out and edit things and don’t worry about everything being perfect.

There’s some tagging guidance for cycleways here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway. If you’re mapping based on local surveys (which is great!) then it’s probably most important to note what the official designation of each bit of path is (cycleway, bridleway, footpath, etc.) — the rest of the tagging can be tidied up from that afterwards.

Personally, I like to make sure to record whether a cycleway/path is lit (lit=yes or lit=no) and paved (surface=asphalt or surface=compacted or something else) too, since I find them quite relevant for cycling. But that’s icing on the cake.

Restricted byways are documented here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions#Restricted_byways.
Bodian (2018-12-28 17:41:14+00:00): Wow - this is a whole new area for me to learn about!  Good job I have a few weeks off.  Thanks ever so much for your help and guidance.
Bodian (2018-12-28 17:41:58+00:00): Wow - a whole new area for me to learn about.  Good job I have a few weeks off!  Many thanks for your help and guidance, much appreciated.
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 11:56:48+00:00): На местности компания не обнаруживается, не вносите фейковые данные
Gregory Peony (2025-10-26 01:15:14+00:00): Hello,

I would be very thankful to have water in the destert, but this looks like a potential typo. Are these water tanks really named thank {number}?
John-O (2018-12-28 08:46:38+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to the map.

I have reverted a few of the nodes modified in this changeset for the following reasons:

Node 486597245 (deleted)
I have restored this node. It marks the platform position (where the passengers wait) of the bus stop. There is a relation which links the stop (position on the way where the bus stops) to the platform. I have restored membership of the relation.

Node 5454175028
I've changed the name back to "Rail Station" and moved "Buses to Kendal & Barrow" to the description tag. The bus stop name should be the name that appears on timetables or in the NAPTAN dataset. Signs with "Buses to Kendal & Barrow" or similar often appear at train stations but this is not the actual name of the bus_stop. 

Please be careful when modifying public_transport objects
Bodian (2018-12-28 09:43:29+00:00): Thanks John.  I have no idea about node numbers, so I'm not quite sure what 486597245 is about - but thanks.  As to the name of the bus stop - what confused me is that when looking at the street map online it says 'Grange Railway Station', when actually it's a bus stop - the station is on the railway.  So, it looked from a distance that the railway station was duplicated.  So, I take your point, but that was where I was coming from.
lakedistrict (2018-12-28 14:17:29+00:00): Hi Bodain, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You've changed some footpaths to cycleways which means that foot access isn't allowed unless foot=yes is added. In future edits it might be better to just add bicycle=yes (under Allowed Access in the editor) to the existing paths. Any questions just ask. :)
Bodian (2018-12-28 17:00:26+00:00): Oh - okay.  Bit odd really, as I don't think there is a cycleway anywhere in Britain where foot access isn't also part of the cycleway.  Cycle lanes on the road may not take walkers (but they aren't cycleways) - but where else would this be the case?

I'll go back and edit them all.  However, I'm a bit puzzled by the question 'All - yes/no, etc?'  What does 'all' mean in the context of a cycleway.  For instance, on the prom its open to walkers and cyclists, but not horses - so do I click 'no' for all, and then 'yes' for the above?

Cheers.
lakedistrict (2018-12-28 18:44:57+00:00): You're right that cycleways usually allow foot access, but the OSM definition only implies cycle access. You can read the tag definitions by clicking the 'i' symbol in the editor or on the wiki: eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway

You can ignore the 'All' box - Foot and Bicycle are probably the most important access types to fill in. Thanks for the fix.
surveyor54 (2018-12-28 08:56:32+00:00): Hi Suidakra,

in Oberleichtersbach haben Bing-Luftbilder einen großen Versatz. Siehe hier: 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65827087/

Bayern (80cm) oder Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta sind hier wesentlich genauer.

Gruß
surveyor54
Suidakra (2018-12-28 18:04:59+00:00): Mmmhhh, irgendwas is da wohl etwas daneben gegangen. Hab von meinen letzten Durchfahrten die Track drübergelegt - hatte eigentlich gepasst.
Na, da hab ich wieder was zu tun ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65827087
Robert Whittaker (2019-04-23 23:39:28+00:00): Can you check the postcode you gave to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658607527 as it doesn't appear to be located in the TW20 postal district. TW20 9PB appears to belong to a different Malt Hill at https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.429777&mlon=-0.556472#map=18/51.42957/-0.55581 .
Danysan95 (2018-12-28 09:19:11+00:00): Ciao, nonostante questo passo sia molto conosciuto come "del prugno" in realtà il suo vero nome è "del corso", come spiegava un utente nel changeset [1] e come puoi verificare ai link [2] e [3] (questo link infatti era anche nel campo "source:name" del nodo). Per questo motivo andava bene name="Passo del Corso"+alt_name="Passo del Prugno", com'era prima.
Ho ripristinato il nome nel changeset [4].

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52684277
[2] http://domenicosportelli.eu/2014/11/dal-passo-del-prugno-alla-chiesa-di-valmaggiore/
[3] http://www.comune.casolavalsenio.ra.it/Turismo/Da-vedere-e-visitare/La-rocca-di-Monte-Battaglia
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/385540764
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65827875
grelus (2019-01-02 08:52:33+00:00): Cześć! Wprowadziłeś zmiany w relacji Blue Velo oznakowując odcinki które nie są oznakowane w terenie a co więcej nie istnieją , są całkowicie nieprzejezdne lub są placem budowy na który jest zakaz wstępu. Proszę o cofnięcie tych zmian do poprzedniego stanu.
ZOOZOOpl Sklep zoologiczny (2018-12-28 00:31:52+00:00): sklep zoologiczny Warszawa Wilanów,  zapraszamy
muralito (2018-12-31 16:18:10+00:00): Jose Pedro Varela es primary aunque no lo parezca  y termine abruptamente en "nada", porque desde hace muchos años nunca se termino la conexion con Camino Maldonado y Ruta 8, y probablemente nunca se termine.

Es la salida hacia esas rutas cuando uno viene del oeste de Montevideo.
whatmeinfallible (2019-01-08 22:55:38+00:00): ¿Crees que sería más apropiado realizar una clasificación Secondary desde Bulevar José Battle y Ordóñez a lo largo de José Pedro Varela, a lo largo de Pavón y Oswaldo Cruz, hasta la intersección de José Belloni?
muralito (2019-01-09 14:59:26+00:00): Quizas si con Jose Pedro Varela, no estoy seguro con Pavon y Osvaldo Cruz.

Estas dos ultimas las podriamos entender como que seria bueno ponerlas secondary para mantener esa conectividad, pero justamente esa continuidad real y efectiva es lo que falta porque si bien las obras se planificaron quizas hace 60 años nunca se hicieron las obras viales.

Por otro lado esas no son las zonas mas lindas de la ciudad para manejar, dar una sensacion de continuidad que no es real no es conveniente.
whatmeinfallible (2019-01-11 01:16:04+00:00): Bueno, gracias.
Supaplex (2018-12-30 18:38:09+00:00): 不好意思，你將國防大學和育敏營區的關係破壞了，導致顯示不正常了。
literan (2018-12-29 15:36:58+00:00): если там нет ручья - то на чем же пруды поставлены??
amgusha (2018-12-29 22:35:20+00:00): Это пожарные пруды.
literan (2018-12-30 08:50:42+00:00): да хоть пожарные, хоть рыбоводные - ну так как туда вода попала, не автотранспортом же привезли? пруды в средних широтах всегда на ручье/реке. Если он пересыхающий (только весной), просто надо поставить на линию ручья тег intermittent=yes
amgusha (2018-12-30 11:44:54+00:00): Не хочу с вами спорить. Сходите сами на местность и посмотрите, когда снег сойдёт.
literan (2018-12-30 15:18:55+00:00): я лучше на велосипеде съезжу
muralito (2018-12-31 16:13:43+00:00): Belloni debe ser primary. Es la principal salida de la ciudad hacia el norte para las rutas 6 y 7, y con la perimetral 102.
Inclusive hace unos meses que esta en obra para ensanchar y duplicar las vias para mejorar el transito.
whatmeinfallible (2019-01-08 18:56:17+00:00): Saludos,

¿Quizás sería mejor extender la clasificación de Primaria para conectar con Camino Maldonado en -34.85524, -56.13168?
muralito (2019-01-08 22:28:02+00:00): No extender "primary" hacia Camino Maldonado no reflejaria la realidad vial, porque en la realidad ese tramo entre Avenida General Flores y Camno Maldonado no es mas importante que Avenida General Flores. Ese tramo de Belloni no va a ser mejorado ni ampliado. La mejora para duplicarlo es desde Avenida General Flores al norte.
muralito (2018-12-28 04:49:18+00:00): Gracias por el aporte.

Quizas sea mas importante (y lo unico visible) la senda, pero cambiaste arroyo por senda, y por lo que decis estan ambas cosas.
 Confirmame asi dejo ambas cosas.
alc112 (2018-12-28 05:13:55+00:00): Hola.  Mil disculpas, recién hoy empecé a usar OSM. Son las dos cosas a la vez. El arroyo está entubado y por encima es un camino peatonal (salvo por donde pasan las calles)
Leno$M (2018-12-28 06:43:19+00:00): Hola alc! Un gusto verte por acá
En respuesta a lo que consulta muralito. Efectivamente, el camino peatonal está sobre lo que vendría a ser un entubado del arroyo que atraviesa la ciudad. 
Como el camino se divide en varias secciones donde algunas están cerradas por vallas y otras no, y a veces se extiende como calle semipeatonal, separé el camino del tag del arroyo y lo dividí en segmentos. Voy a chequear esto
muralito (2018-12-28 14:31:07+00:00): Es como vos decis, hay que dibujar las cosas separadas. El arroyo encañado por un lado y el camino por otro.

Lo dejo para ustedes.
WoodWoseWulf (2018-12-28 02:10:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I see that you've added a new building, which is great, but you've applied a building tag to the entire block rather than just the house itself. Did you want to try to fix it?
literan (2018-12-29 15:51:33+00:00): Зачем вы ставите bicycle=no? там что, есть запрет ездить на велосипедах... Удалил
amgusha (2018-12-29 22:38:14+00:00): А почему вы решили, что этот тег поставил я?
literan (2018-12-30 08:51:42+00:00): Потому что в истории линии первый - вы, именно с этими тегами https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658621809/history https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#65829194
amgusha (2018-12-30 11:53:36+00:00): Тоже с вами спорить не хочу, но эти дороги были до меня. Я удалил только лишнее и местами привёл остальное в актуальную форму и тип. Посмотрите, например,  на opentopomap, которые давно не обновлялись. https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/55.86247/37.14145
GOwin (2018-12-31 05:16:36+00:00): Hi @lorenzo rafael. 

A good practice while working on your favorite neighbourhoods is try to keep the editing area as small as possible, to keep the relevant edits together, and the changeset as small as possible.

In this case you edited some features in Nabas, and then jumped to Buruanga - over 22 kilometers away.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65829269
literan (2018-12-29 15:38:31+00:00): Для крутых склонов предназначен тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dearth_bank
chnav (2018-12-31 13:18:49+00:00): Правка откачена полностью как не соответствующая местности. Для персональных заметок используйте специальные возможности программы MAPS.ME
GOwin (2018-12-31 05:28:20+00:00): Hi @Joebertsss. We have concerns about yours, and your fellow team members' edits. Please let us know how to contact your project direct or your editing team supervisor.

We acknowledge that this effort appears to be important,  in relation to the distribution of Certificate of Lot Occupancy in your community, and the local OSM community would like to find ways to assist your efforts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65829947