piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
czubi (2021-04-02 17:11:11+00:00): Da haste dir ja gleich ein schwieriges Gebäude ausgesucht. Ich hab auch einige Versuche gebraucht ehe der Dom vernünftig aussah. Man muss allerdings auch immer dran denken das sich an so schwierig getaggten Gebäude keiner, und schon gar kein Anfänger, mehr rantraut. Das ist eigentlich gegen das Wesen eines Gemeinschaftsprojektes weil es die Einstiegshürden unnötig hochsetzt. Deswegen habe ich auch wirklich nur die Sehenswürdigkeiten in 3D gemacht. Da bin ich eigentlich eher ein :Keep it simple: Verfechter.
felf (2021-04-02 20:08:22+00:00): Durch meine 3D-Vorerfahrung fand ich es weniger schwierig als vielmehr Spaß am Modellieren. :)

Bei den Brot-und-Butter-Gebäuden halte ich es weiterhin eher simpel, sonst werde ich ja nicht fertig. Auch wenn dann wegen Unregelmäßiger Umrisse das Dach nicht immer perfekt wird. Da müssen auch die Renderer erst noch besser werden.

Mein Ziel ist eine möglichst flächendeckend schöne Karte, die nicht mehr aus Default-Blöcken besteht.
czubi (2021-04-02 20:17:23+00:00): Richtig so! Habe auch nur einige in 3D gemacht. Weiter so! Wenn es Fragen gibt melde dich.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-07-09 22:35:13+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4846889
Warin61 (2021-04-06 22:01:30+00:00): Hi
Did you mean to change the administration boundary for the post code 3004 (relation 3402721)???
TheSwavu (2021-04-13 10:28:08+00:00): Fixed in changeset #102857323
Mrbear1321 (2021-04-13 10:36:07+00:00): Hi, I definetly did not mean to do it.  I apologise for the error and delay in response. I believed I had avoided adjusting the admin boundary, obviously I didn't.
TheSwavu (2021-04-14 11:22:00+00:00): No worries. Relations are sometimes tricky to deal with in iD.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 14:24:22+00:00): You broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12460059 by not adding `building=*` to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925188472
sebastic (2021-04-16 14:33:35+00:00): If you noticed that, why didn't you fix it?
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 14:51:11+00:00): Why don't you wait to see if I'm editing before you make a judgement then? That's an info for you only.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 14:53:24+00:00): That's not the only problem either, for you are so responsible to ask why I had not fixed it when I comment. Above all, please don't make changesets spanning large areas in the future.
sebastic (2021-04-16 15:09:08+00:00): Uploading more frequently makes the QA work too tedious, so no. The data is already split into separate countries, that's the best you're going to get.

In the future, don't bother with changeset comments if you're fixing the issue.
Konkon153 (2021-04-02 12:05:43+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Gehlsbach vollständig angepasst ]
Agaric (2021-04-13 21:41:37+00:00): Attention ereur de saisie, j'ai déplacé par erreur certains points (différents des boites aux lettres) de leur position initiale.
4004 (2021-04-05 00:10:38+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
название это хорошо, но для нормального пользования, нужно еще тип обьекта (пожарная часть тут думаю подойдет)
Ds5rUy (2021-04-02 14:48:43+00:00): Thanks for noticing that something was wrong with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589935481/ 

But it shouldn't have been deleted, instead the missing relation that it should be part of should have been added.

(I've undeleted the way and added the missing relation).
literan (2021-04-02 15:59:11+00:00): укажите, пожалуйста, заметкой, куда их подвинули
neo-plan (2021-04-02 16:34:37+00:00): Пока не знаю, информацию взял из пресс-релиза Московского транспорта.
impiaaa (2021-04-02 14:55:00+00:00): The map is only supposed to have one feature per item, however you have added 2 duplicate hotels. Please keep the hotel as a point like it was before, or make it an area or multipolygon, instead of multiple buildings.
eggie (2021-04-02 13:25:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-02 17:35:15+00:00): Review.. Wanneer mofa en moped er door mogen kun je nog moped=yes en mofa=yes worden toegevoegd.
De rest van de accesstagging is default.
MVG
eggie
LukasJerabek (2021-04-02 13:14:26+00:00): Tak snad už v pohodě?
user_5359 (2021-04-02 15:56:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.

I have revert your change set.
jaap de vries (2021-04-04 10:09:33+00:00): Dit is een zzp'er zonder fysiek bezoek adres volgens de regels worden deze niet op de kaart gezet. zie ook het forum topic https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64968
Pas je eaa aan ook bij je andere bijdragen op deze manier?
user_12625593 (2021-04-04 15:19:54+00:00): Het leek er erg op dat er een bedrijfsruimte bij deze woning zat, voordeel van twijfel. Maar verder onderzoek leert dat het op een enkele MBO-student gaat, dus inderdaad hoort deze niet in OSM.
TomPar (2021-04-03 00:38:06+00:00): Generally speaking, landcover mapping tags, like "natural=wood" should not go on the ways/multiploygons that define a parcel boundary...in this case the state forest.  Furthermore there are some small wetland areas on the parcel so it's not true that the whole area is a "natural=wood".

I'd apreciate a response to a comment I made on one of your other changeset a while back.  Did you not see it?  Thanks.
MxxCon (2021-04-03 01:58:48+00:00): Hello.
Do you have some more information regarding this node? Is "electronics shop" the correct tag for it?👍
MxxCon (2021-04-03 02:17:51+00:00): Hello.
Please note that as per documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertising messages.
Additionally, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact social media information should be tagged with "contact:" prefix.
Also, "keywords" tag is not a thing in OSM.
Finally, opening hours must follow a specific syntax as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

As such, all these issues have been address in other edits.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.👍
user_5359 (2021-04-03 06:25:57+00:00): Hello! Quick note on wikipedia notation: do not add wikipedia=fr:<wiki page> andwikipedia:fr=<wiki page>. These are identical specifications. 

If you have different languages for wiki articles, choose one (usually the local language wiki article has the best information). Wikipedia has an internal way to link the different languages, it is not necessary to add different languages.
Luzandro (2022-02-16 19:05:27+00:00): Das sind nicht die Haus-, sondern die Stiegennummern, die schon als addr:unit erfasst waren, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2564412
Robert Whittaker (2021-05-09 14:19:12+00:00): Hi! Could I ask where you got the postcode from for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8586745658 ? According to Code-Point Open, NR34 9HT belongs to Bramley Rise in Beccles, which isn't the location of the node you added. See https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/NR/NR34/9/#9HT
Beermad (2021-05-09 15:14:41+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for pointing this out. I mistakenly added the postcode for where the brewery was *originally* located.
I've deleted the wrong one and will try to find the correct one to add.

Cheers
Tony
Beermad (2021-05-09 15:22:57+00:00): According to https://postal-code.co.uk/by-address it's NR34 8DQ, so I've corrected it to that.
Robert Whittaker (2021-05-09 17:45:32+00:00): Hmmm, that site seems rather opaque over where it's data has come from, and it's not entirely clear how it can be re-used. Without further information, I'd say it's not an acceptable source for OpenStreetMap.

We are able to use Code-Point Open though, since it's released under the Open Government Licence. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_OpenData#Code-Point_Open
Beermad (2021-05-09 17:49:32+00:00): Fair comment. I'll delete the postcode until I can confirm it from elsewhere.
Thanks for your guidance.
Sanniu (2021-04-04 12:27:14+00:00): Hi

Is all changed roads are open for traffic? If so, please remove construction= tags.
Are all ground paths in this area removed? Can you, please, remove them?
SHARCRASH (2021-04-03 14:02:50+00:00): Hello! Why did you remove a portion of this way on the eastern side? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39456295
Even though there might be no trace because grass or even crops has grown (it happens frequently when farmers do not care), there is a "virtual" access to reach the way in the woods through the field.
dFeldmaus (2021-04-03 15:44:44+00:00): Hi! I was there 3 days ago and there is no way on that portion on the field. I verified the ortho's trough 2001, the topo and the hybrid on geoportail.lu and there was never a way or a path on the field. There was a hedgerow in 2001. Even if I agree that sometimes "farmers don't care" there's still something called "private property" so I think that the owner/farmer is not amused if you hike or bike a way through his crop even if it's simply Grass. The way is physically not there and non existant and the "virtual" access to the woods is blocked by a tree trunk. The removal is based on what is not physically there and not practicable. Greetings dFeldmaus
SHARCRASH (2021-04-06 16:46:53+00:00): As i said on fields there might be no real visible way but there must be a means to access the way in the woods, even if it is blocked by a trunk at a certain point (which happens often for whatever reason in the woods). Also note that the blocked way is although drawn in Geoportail.lu Topo, so it doesn't go up there without any reason. When i wrote "through the field" on my previous comment, it is not actually in the middle of it, actually it's in between 2 parcels (before represented by the hedge you mentioned, which can suggest that it's a servitude access to the woods and field behind and further. 

You deleted that portion but it is just like this other way here also not visible at all because of grass and also not present on Geoportail.lu Topo connecting the trail: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835086978 There are people who use it and it is possibly useful for urgency matters. Though that one you didn't delete it? What's the difference for you for not having deleted it?

About Geoportail.lu Topo as a reference, it's not a trustful resource  anymore because it's outdated/misses features and has errors. I've put countless notes in OSM warning for this.

Kind regards, S
Dindia (2021-04-28 13:21:09+00:00): 1. זו לא אטרקציה אלא שעה
2. לא ברור לאן היציאה כי לא מוביל לשום שביל
Facalderonm (2021-04-04 19:20:01+00:00): You turned into "bridge" roads that are not!
Joel Amos (2021-04-03 20:05:01+00:00): Thanks!
Niiepce (2021-12-12 16:27:19+00:00): Hallo fbausch.
Wieso hast du bicycle=no bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24832484 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481228685 gesetzt? Das ist falsch und auch widersprüchlich zu dem Tag lcn=yes. Ich werde es ändern.
MfG
fbausch (2021-12-15 16:19:57+00:00): Zu dem Zeitpunkt, als ich es eingetragen habe, war dieser Weg tatsächlich für längere Zeit für Fahrräder gesperrt. Ich habe es versäumt, das nach der Freigabe wieder rückgängig zu machen.
mueschel (2021-04-05 12:00:57+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag 'ref:CIS_JR' here. At the same time a tag 'ref:CIS_JŘ' appeared as well. Could you check that & maybe find a common spelling?
TomPar (2021-04-03 00:51:21+00:00): This private land is definitely not a "landuse=recreation_ground".  Please consult the wiki to make sure you're getting the proper meaning.  In many cases the colloqualial American Engilish intrepretation of tag names are quite different than the intended meaning.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102200759
Berlin53 (2021-08-16 13:50:05+00:00): Du Hast Zugangsbeschränkungen in Alken entfernt. Stehen die entsprechenden Schilder nicht mehr dort?
carfog81 (2021-04-05 16:20:52+00:00): Hola por favor no dañar las relaciones Multipoligono en este conjunto de cambios, daño 2. por favor ser más cuidadoso. Usar JOSM para editar es mucho mejor, ya que al subir genera una advertencia cuando se dañan las relaciones
JuanMelo (2021-04-05 20:11:02+00:00): buena tarde, 
con respecto al comentario, únicamente di continuidad a la vía y ajusté las mayúsculas en el nombre. Agradezco si me puede aclarar el error para evitar cometerlo nuevamente. Gracias.
carfog81 (2021-04-05 22:15:15+00:00): La Vía estaba dividida por que hace parte de 2 relaciones multipolígono (ejemplos https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples), El parque Bochalema  y el conjunto cerrado "K-111 Granadillo"
JuanMelo (2021-04-05 22:17:31+00:00): Muchas gracias por la respuesta... lo tendré en cuenta
Syl (2021-04-02 15:04:58+00:00): Mauvais commentaire, il s'agit d'un début de correction de la ligne 6.
uvi (2021-04-10 12:06:31+00:00): Please do not give the objects names like "Bench" or "drinking water"!! They are labeled with "amenity" best: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/​wiki/​Key:amenity
GerdP (2024-10-24 06:25:50+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich war selbst nicht vor Ort, aber heisst das Gebäüde https://www.osm.org/way/798895059 heute wirklich "ehemals Rotes Haus" oder hiess es früher "Rotes Haus" und jetzt nicht mehr?
In name=* sollte wirklich nur der aktuelle Name rein. Ansonsten evtl. old_name=* oder was:name=* oder evtl. ein anderer Prefix aus dieser Liste: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

ciao,
Gerd
rohieb (2021-04-02 15:20:43+00:00): JOSM wollte mich nicht die kompletten URLs ins Feld "source" eingeben lassen: 
* http://www.braunschweig.de/politik_verwaltung/bekanntmachungen/amtsblatt/amtsblatt_stadt_braunschweig_2021_5.pdf
* http://www.braunschweig.de/politik_verwaltung/bekanntmachungen/amtsblatt/Anlage-1-Massgebliche-Karte.pdf
Cristoffs (2021-04-05 18:41:14+00:00): Proszę opisuj swoje zmiany dokładniej. "Poprawki" nic nie mówią. Zmieniłeś kilka nazw na takie które nie są zgodne z wytycznymi oraz zmieniłeś relacje transportu publicznego. Czy na pewno takie było zmierzenie tek edycji?
zarmiks (2021-04-06 08:13:22+00:00): Dobrze, przepraszam. Poprawiłem położenie i nazwy niektórych przystanków oraz nadałem nazwę łącznika Długiej i Szymborskiej która została ogłoszona podczas sesji inowrocławskich radnych dnia 29.03.2021
Cristoffs (2021-04-06 10:41:11+00:00): Super! Tylko pamiętaj, że ID nie nadaje się do skomplikowanych edycji. Jeśli zamierzasz dalej się udzielać warto nauczyć się JOSM-a. Trasy komunikacji miejskiej są oznaczane jako relacje, a ich edytowanie nie jest najłatwiejsze. Na i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page jako lektura dodatkowa ;-)
10992 (2021-04-02 15:30:26+00:00): also MK rose
tablogix (2021-04-02 16:59:27+00:00): Почему удалена точка?
jeka p (2021-04-04 18:24:17+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

zur Info: es gibt inzwischen Vogis 2020 Bilder im JOSM.

SG,
Jeka
BAGgeraar (2021-04-14 19:54:52+00:00): De rails voor de kranen heb ik gewijzigd naar man_made=crane_rail. Want dit is in ieder geval geen railway=narrow_gauge. Wellicht is het beter om de 2 rails met een relatie te koppelen tot 1 kraan? Want de rails staan er nu volgens mij wel in, maar de kraan zelf nog niet...
literan (2021-04-02 16:14:53+00:00): тег office - именно для офисов, а не для складов, которые вы арендуете/используете. http://www.tablogix.ru/contacts/ тут указано, что офис в Крылатском. Поэтому правку принять нельзя.
tablogix (2021-04-02 16:36:26+00:00): Какой тег уместно использовать? 

Добавлял через приложение Maps.me. Тег там назывался не Office, а Организация.
tablogix (2021-04-02 17:00:30+00:00): и почему Вы удалили точку с офисом?
Пакет правок: 102204076
literan (2021-04-03 11:52:08+00:00): Добрый день. У нас тут карта, а не каталог организаций и бизнесов (как, например, в 2гис или Яндексе). Мы на карту добавляем только реально существующие на местности объекты. 

Для обозначения здания склада надо поставить его контур и добавить тег building=warehouse. Если вы являетесь его владельцем, можно поставить тег owner=ООО "...". Полки на складах, участки земли, арендуемые кем-то, мы не обозначаем. 

Офис верну, случайно удалил. Впрочем, вы его дважды добавили, задублировали - восстановлю только одну точку.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-02 16:50:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102141505, 102151351.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-22 14:59:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925258503/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany?
voltairovicz (2025-05-28 09:39:40+00:00): Witaj, czytalem wiele artykulow ze jak najbardziej tak i ten most trafil do rzadowego programu mostowego, koncepcja zapewne przerysowana zostala z mapki, ktora np jest w tym artykule. https://samorzad.pap.pl/klub-samorzadowy/kozienice/kategoria/aktualnosci/kozienice-jest-decyzja-srodowiskowa-ws-budowy
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-28 09:41:25+00:00): To jest z 2023

Coś się ruszyło od tego czasu?
voltairovicz (2025-05-28 09:47:32+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia. Nie śledzę wszystkich projektów szczerze. Na szybko sprawdziłem artykuł z września 2024 że były jakies odwołania od decyzji środowiskowej, ale nie ma żadnych przesłanek, by miało się zrezygnować z tego mostu, może czeka na finansowanie, np jakiś most w lubuskim koło Zielonej Góry też długo czekał i w komcu przetarg się pojawił
rskedgell (2021-04-02 19:01:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and many thanks for updating the new access from the Greenway.

You asked for a review, so I hope the following comments are useful. You did a much better job than I would have done when I was new to OSM. If you need any help, please feel free to ask.

In respect of the new link itself ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853988878 ):
- It may need connecting to one of the service roads in the car park or hospital grounds, so that pedestrian routers can reach the hospital entrance(s) from The Greenway.
- The contents of the name=* tag should be moved to description=*, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
- The oneway=yes tag should probably be deleted unless the route can only be used to enter the hospital grounds (routers will probably ignore it anyway).
- Where the link crosses the fence on the boundary, consider adding a barrier=gate node (assuming there is a gate here), or splitting the fence to create a gap.
- The construction=footway tag can be deleted, as it is no longer under construction.
- If only part of the link descends an incline, you could split the way and remove the incline=down tag from the flat part.
- Assuming the link is on hospital grounds, you could add the access tags bicycle=permissive + foot=permissive to it, plus any gates and new connecting ways.
IanVG (2022-06-09 19:05:07+00:00): Hello jmingram1, thanks for your edits! Please make to sure that when tracing from satellite imagery that the buildings are squared. It takes a lot of time for things like this to fixed. Also, you added the word "Home" to the name of the houses. This is incorrect. Only add names to places that publicly feature this name or if it is commonly known by the community by the name. Feel free to message me back, or check out the wiki page for more information on good mapping practices. Happy mapping!
VA00 (2021-07-10 09:29:04+00:00): Remont oznacza się w inny sposób: access=no, construction=yes Poza tym już jest otwarte
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-02 17:05:20+00:00): Šita gatvė jau pilnai pastatyta bet uždraustas eismas?
AlgirdasM (2021-04-02 17:21:08+00:00): Sveiki čia Algirdo g. Taip pat yra gyvenamasis namas su adresu Algirdo g. 14 kelias per pievą todėl pažymėjau dviračiais pėstiesiems mašinoms nlb važiuoti bet ymanoma
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-02 17:28:45+00:00): highway=unclassified yra stipiriai per didelė klasė tada. Pakeičiau į highway=track+tracktype=grade5 (lauko kelias su žolės danga)
AlgirdasM (2021-04-02 17:38:58+00:00): Liuks
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-02 17:06:28+00:00): Gal reikia pagalbos? Kas čia buvo bandyta pažymėti?
AlgirdasM (2021-04-02 17:19:34+00:00): Sveiki čia kelias pažymėti bandžiau iš punkthrines y kelio zymejima
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-02 17:25:33+00:00): Punktyrinė reiškia, kad čia yra lauko kelias (taip buvo pažymėta). Ar tikrai dabar šitas kelias yra gerokai pagerintas - su normaliu pagrindu, bent žvyro danga ir platus tiek, kad galėtų du autobusai prasilenkti nenuvažiuodami nuo kelio?
AlgirdasM (2021-04-02 17:38:22+00:00): Nea 2 autobusai netilps
DressyPear4 (2021-04-03 16:01:53+00:00): Olá, você pode tirar dúvidas aqui https://telegram.me/osm_classificacao_vias
antes de classificar as vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102207316
alesarrett (2021-04-23 03:03:20+00:00): In questo changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103445064) ho corretto track in path e sistemato alcuni errori.
Attenzione negli edit a non sovrapporre geometrie nuove ad altre già esistenti e a non spostare elementi esistenti (avevi involontariamente modificato degli edifici esistenti)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102207386
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-02 22:26:42+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició, sobretot per afegir totes aquestes dades.
Et comento algunes coses:
- has esborrat un parc infantil a Molins de Rei, i has marcat un pas de vianants com a parc infantil
- has creat el parc del Pi Gros, que ja existeix: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10031022
- Segons Catastro el passatge es diu "de l'Arboçar"
I algunes coses més, però no et preocupis per això, aniràs millorant quan més editis, i has aportat dades valuoses de la zona.
No cal que modifiquis res, ja ho tens a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102218160
Si pots, el parc del Cargol hauria de ser àrea i no un punt. Revisa els números de telèfon, que he vist que faltava una xifra a un dels establiments. Ah, i també procura afegir els noms sense totes les lletres en majúscules (p.e. Royal Kebab i no ROYAL KEBAB), si no és un acrònim.
De nou gràcies per l'edició. Segueix afegint dades!
Salutacions!
aceman444 (2021-05-02 12:40:20+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenia. Ale do znacky 'name' patri len vlastne meno objektu, a nie Vas osobny opis objektu ako "bývalá úzkokoľajka". Taktiez nie je spravne, ze ste zahodili pracu predchadzajucihc autorov a odstranili celu trasu a nahradili ju novou cestou. Stacilo povodnu cestu upresnit.
Cristoffs (2021-04-05 18:37:50+00:00): Cześć! Dodałeś gabinet lekarski na trawniku. Czy tam znajduje się jakiś budynek?
elsy1 (2021-04-02 17:40:21+00:00): درود  زمین هایی که باغ هستند و دارای درختان میوه دار هستند را تگ درختان طبیعی تعریف کردید   لطفا در ویرایش خود دقت بیشتری به خرج دهید
elsy1 (2021-04-02 17:58:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard
syncronic (2021-10-24 18:43:02+00:00): Hallo Arminus, du hast hier das Wildschutzgebiet Friedergriess mit Betretungsverbot eingetragen. Das gibt es tatsächlich vor Ort. Das Betretungsverbot wird durch einen Zaun mit Schildern realisiert, den wir mittlerweile vollständig eingetragen haben. Das entsprechende Gebiet ist aber deutlich kleiner als deines, so dass jetzt auch Wege ausserhalb des Zauns mit Betretungsverbot in OSM versehen sind. An den Grenzen deines Gebiets gibt es keinerlei Hinweise. Vielleicht kannst du deine Quellen nochmal überprüfen.
Arminus (2021-10-24 20:27:58+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, meine Quellen waren "offizielle" Shapes vom DAV, Stand Winter 2021. Kannst Du das Gebiet ggf. korrigieren? Ich würde das zumindest an den DAV zurück melden, ob's da auf fruchtbaren Boden fällt weiß ich aber nicht...
syncronic (2021-10-25 12:24:11+00:00): Was sollen denn diese offiziellen Shapes darstellen? Der DAV spricht ja eigentlich keine Betretungsverbote aus. Der Zaun ist eindeutig, aber was dein Gebiet bedeuten soll, weiß ich nicht.
Arminus (2021-10-25 12:50:00+00:00): Diese Gebiete "bedeuten" das hier:

https://www.alpenverein.de/natur/naturvertraeglicher-bergsport/natuerlich-auf-tour/informationen-zu-wald-wild-schongebiete_aid_14584.html

Und nein, das ist kein Verbot. Vielleicht liegt auch im "gebotenen Schongebiet" jetzt ein (kleineres?) eingezäuntes Verbotsgebiet?