piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-01-02 09:00:52+00:00): review request:
Het principe is goed. Zo'n cover leisure=park. Het zat helaas vastgeplakt aan de landuse en de wegen. Bij verschuivingen krijg je dan ellende. 
Dat park het ik losgemaakt en een tikje verschoven. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55089392
Ook zaten de paden vastgeplakt aan de landuse grass. Dat is ook ongewenst. Met editor JOSM heb je ze zo weer los. paden horen dus te eindigen op een ander pad of weg. Ze mogen verder nergens aan vastgeplakt zijn. Editor iD lijkt wel ingebouwde lijm te bevatten. Beter zo snel mogelijk overstappen op editor JOSM. 
Editor potlatch2 plakt niet. Ook een optie.
De zuidelijke vijver zit als inner in de multipolygon. van de outer grass. Je mag dus niet de vijvers onder de brug verbinden. (heb je ook niet gedaan) Wanneer je dat wel wil moet je een geheel nieuwe oplossing verzinnen. 

Editor JOSM heeft een validator die zulke fouten eruit haalt bij uploaden. 
editor josm stap voor stap:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Wanneer je vragen hebt.. stel ze gerust.
eggie (2018-01-02 09:15:31+00:00): Het parkeergedeelte voor het centrum moet volgens mij Hoflaan zijn anders kloppen de adressen niet. 
Kijk je daar nog even naar?
Digne (2018-01-03 20:15:29+00:00): No remarks here. It all looks fine.
km2bp (2018-01-10 19:25:23+00:00): ok
viloan (2018-01-02 00:50:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-02 12:00:44+00:00): Você deletou algumas coisas aqui como: "Santa Casa São Vicente de Paulo" Por que fez isso?
baspng (2018-01-03 23:21:54+00:00): Você apagou vários objetos do mapa que estão ativos, vários deles inseridos por mim mesmo. Eu os conheço. Existe maneira de recuperá-los. Peça ajuda, se precisar. Erros acontecem.
naoliv (2018-01-03 23:30:49+00:00): Reverti em #55142717
baspng (2018-01-04 16:59:31+00:00): Ok. Sugiro providências sobre os conjuntos (18 ao todo) do mapeador massaki. No local não existem esses objetos.
naoliv (2018-01-04 17:01:38+00:00): Quais 18 conjuntos, bas?
baspng (2018-01-04 18:17:31+00:00): 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/massaki/history#map=15/-20.6269/-49.6433
naoliv (2018-01-04 18:24:06+00:00): Beleza. Tem umas coisas falsas pelo jeito, igual https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469414035
Depois eu dou uma olhada nisso.
mueschel (2018-01-02 13:04:16+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "gone:railway" for this railway. 'gone' is none of the usual lifecycle prefixes - If the rails have been removed, it should be "railway = razed", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

Jan
Warin61 (2018-01-02 22:20:21+00:00): I agree 'gone: is not 'usual' - still thinking about it. I used this as a temporary hold for transfer of data to Open Historical Map (I hope). 

'railway=razed' may only apply to track, not stations and other railway things. I think it is a poor tag! I would much rather have something like 'gone:' that can be used on other things as well as railway. 

As I see it OSM has the following stages of 'decay';
disused: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
abandoned: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
ruins ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins I think this should be changed to ruins: 

There could be the following;
razed: as further along from ruins. 
archeological: :)  or gone:

But for things that are archeological/gone   I would think that they would be far better removed from OSM (not 'on the ground') and placed on OHM. 

I hope to place these 'gone:' things on OHM soon.
mueschel (2018-01-02 22:24:48+00:00): "razed:" is also quite common: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/razed%3Arailway#values

For these long-gone objects it might indeed be better to remove them completly, but others might disagree.
Warin61 (2018-01-02 22:47:16+00:00): "others might disagree" ... Yes .. 'they' will disagree! However if a good alternative is offered (such as OHM) then 'we' might get agreement, at least the vast majority? Fingers crossed. 

razed: is not on the wiki .. probably because the vast majority would 'disagree' with it :)
Warin61 (2018-01-03 23:50:41+00:00): I have now copied this railway line to OHM .. and it is there nicely.

Sections of this line I have tagged 'ruined:' other sections 'nonexistent:' and the southern platform/station abandoned: 

Not firm on the ruined: nor nonexistent: ... see how discussions on the tagging list go. Then I may make a proposal for both tags in the interests of making them the normal ones to use.
mueschel (2018-01-04 20:20:28+00:00): ruins: is used more often than ruined: and nonexistent: is not used anywhere else. 

Why not add razed: to the lifecycle prefixes? This should not be a problem, the page is just a plain list of used tags, not proposing any. Used already >>1000 times and would be a good fit, also because xzy=razed is also quite common.

I don't think we need new tags.
Warin61 (2018-01-04 21:58:37+00:00): Tags at present;

razed means the same as demolished. 
removed means something different from razed, both of these say something about the method used to gain the absence of the feature. Yet the on the ground result is the same - the feature is no longer there. As a mapper I may not be able to determine the method, just the end result. I would like to have a single word that incorporates all these tags in one. 
Same thing for the tags was, past and some uses of history .. all trying to indicate the past use of a feature that has been re-purposed. 
Note I have added comments on the life cycle discussion page and on the tagging list so there can be a wider discussion and there might be some better ideas than my poor ones.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Lifecycle_prefix
Constable (2018-01-20 09:25:12+00:00): Hi there, please make sure you place this one where it belongs, right now it looks like Wallmart is located in a parking lot
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5315598916
Digne (2018-01-03 20:17:58+00:00): Looks good, no remarks here.
km2bp (2018-01-10 19:24:49+00:00): ok
Digne (2018-01-03 20:19:36+00:00): No remarks here. The changeset looks fine.
km2bp (2018-01-10 19:23:13+00:00): ok
user_5359 (2018-01-02 06:29:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Not every object of Sonata Aparments have an address (water and highways). In general, it is also possible to add the name of the complex to the property instead of every house. In the same way, most houses have an angle of 90 degrees.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-23 16:59:00+00:00): here you added many roads that do not exist.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-23 16:59:29+00:00): sorry, it was not you. it was changesets before.
viloan (2018-01-02 02:26:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Haris IRM-ED (2021-06-24 07:59:39+00:00): Olá Matheus Baeryon

Acabei de encontrar este polígono marcado como Lagoa, mas com base nas imagens Maxar Premium. Não há nenhum recurso que se pareça com uma lagoa ... e esta localização da lagoa também se cruza com uma estrada existente. Eu recomendo verificar isso e considerar a exclusão deste.
Melhor.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/550348617
surveyor54 (2018-03-12 17:52:21+00:00): Hi BeKri,
sind hier wirklich zwei Hochspannungsleitungen nebeneinander.
Einmal gemappt vom Prince Kassad am 1.1.2018 und von dir am 2.1.2018.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550349795
Kannst du das mal kontrollieren?

Gruß
surveyor54
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-12 18:42:35+00:00): Fiel mir auch gerade auf. Ein echtes Kopf-an-Kopf-Mapping :) der Prinz war aber rund acht Stunden eher da.
BeKri (2018-03-12 20:09:32+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
natürlich ist da ne doppelte Leitung ;-)
Weil Wachstedt immer so viel Strom saugt, das die Uhren falsch gehen ...
Oder war es Küllstedt ???
Interessant finde ich neben der zeitlichen Überschneidung, daß:
1. Prince Kassad einen Mast mehr erwischt hat
2. unsere ja wirklich unabhängige Erfassung der Masten maximal so um 0,6 m variiert,
finde ich sehr ordentliche Arbeit !

Und natürlich nehem ich als Zweiter meine Leitung gleich wieder raus ... sorry.
Gruss und Danke für den Hinweis
derBeKri
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-12 21:39:26+00:00): Beide haben doch noch kein voltage=* dran, oder? Gib auf deine ein paar kV mehr, und die prinzliche löst sich in Wohlgefallen auf :)
BeKri (2018-03-12 22:07:00+00:00): Und was empfiehlst Du mir so an kV ?
Nehma 15 oder doch 20 ? Was ist mit 30 kV?
Als Elektriker empfinde ich solche Angaben als hochgradig unseriös. Entweder ich arbeite dort und weiß es oder es ist reine Spekulation (halte ich 80-95% aller Angabe für, pauschal mal 20 kV, bast scho ....)
Und wenn ich das mal übernommen habe, dann die sicher hochwertig recherierten Spannungsangaben anderer Leitungen ;-)
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-12 22:55:36+00:00): Eiweiß. In England sind sie da viel freundlicher und schreiben’s groß dran: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20_kV_switch_and_tap.jpg
BCNorwich (2018-01-02 08:05:55+00:00): Hi just wanted to let you know that the two streams you added are mapped to be flowing away from the main river. I may be wrong but this doesn't seem natural.
Also the stream is connected to the river bank and not to the main river. Thus the stream is not connected to the waterway network.
A remedy would be to reverse the two stream ways and extend the one to join with the river center line.
Please see here for more information :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream

Regards Bernard
johnwmpls (2018-01-03 02:18:12+00:00): Hmmm... I'm  out confident which way they are flowing. Either way, I'll fix the connection issue
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:17:30+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
viloan (2018-01-02 02:49:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
siripurapu (2019-02-28 02:56:48+00:00): "Hi farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437494173 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsistency.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
siripurapu (2019-02-28 03:04:44+00:00): "Hi farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437494173 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsistency and a teritiary is abruptly ending on it.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
siripurapu (2019-02-28 03:06:03+00:00): "Hi adiatmad,
Sorry for the inocrrect pings,excuse and please check the below one and ignore the rest.
Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437494173 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsistency.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
siripurapu (2019-02-28 03:07:49+00:00): Please read the way id as way 436516925.

Thanks in advance.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-02-28 03:13:54+00:00): Hello sirirapu

I change way 436516925 and nearby to service because industrial area. Happy mapping with OSM!
Thanks
sun_jeev (2019-02-27 03:33:16+00:00): Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437489123 seems duplicate. 

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Dennis IRM-ED (2019-02-27 04:42:02+00:00): hello, I've checked the way 437489123 and I didn't find any duplicates there. I've ensured again the way. Thanks in advance
dennisramadhan (2019-03-12 04:13:42+00:00): I combined the tertiary road here
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-20 14:49:24+00:00): Marllon ao desenhar este estacionamento próximo ao torto você não conectou as vias corretamente.
siripurapu (2019-02-28 02:03:07+00:00): "Hi Saputra deo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 501234141 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residental'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
chitra1 (2019-02-22 17:51:23+00:00): Hi Saputra deo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 438420547 , way 438420517 , way 438420550 , way 438420537 , way 438420531 & way 438420537 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-02-25 02:23:54+00:00): Hello chitra1,

He is my partner now. I think when he work on this changeset only focus to fix untagged ways not change to the correct tagging. I look those ways and no doubt they are residentials. Please change to correct tag.
Happy mapping.

Thank you.
saputra deo (2019-02-25 04:09:04+00:00): Hi Chitra1,
Thanks for the correction. I agree that road should be residential. If you find a data like that, you can directly change due to that road is around settlements.

Thank you.
chitra1 (2019-02-25 13:12:49+00:00): Hi Saputra deo,

Thanks for your response.
Came across a different issue where existing data was not matching with any of the imagery(way 438420528) hence made necessary changes.
Keeping you posted.
siripurapu (2019-03-01 03:54:26+00:00): "Hi saputra deo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 438005734,way 438005690,way 438005697 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Marc_ch (2018-01-04 18:00:24+00:00): Hello and welcome !
Thank you for cleaning up your test.
If you want to test, don't hesitate to do it in the tutorial, which prevents the test from being displayed in the real map.
Regards,
Marc
WalkerB (2018-06-04 19:32:31+00:00): Thank you for adding the planning department.  Would it be possible to add all the names in Dari and/or Pashto as well?  We want OSM to be useful for the population of Afghanistan and not just english speakers.
nadigatla (2019-02-26 03:15:42+00:00): "Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437489740, way 437490207, way 437490468 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. 

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
nadigatla (2019-02-26 03:21:38+00:00): Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437490525, way 437489285, way 437490026 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. 

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-02-26 04:10:13+00:00): Hi nadigatla,

He is my partner now. Thank you for confirming, here are my suggestions :
 
way 437489740: residential
way 437490207: unclassified because connecting settlements
way 437490468: unclassified because connecting settlements
way 437490525: residential
way 437489285: residential
way 437490026: residential

Thanks.
pravenya (2019-02-27 01:23:37+00:00): Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437395796 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be a duplicate segment as already another way id way 437395796 is existing.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
nadigatla (2019-02-27 02:58:31+00:00): Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437489582 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around it seem residential.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Dennis IRM-ED (2019-02-27 03:07:23+00:00): hello, I am Dennisramadhan using another account. I agree with Dinar, he is my partner doing same project as me
bhavani1 (2019-03-07 03:34:53+00:00): Hi Dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the 
way 438005749
way 438005721 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around it seem residential.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
bhavani1 (2019-03-07 03:59:20+00:00): "Hi Armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 550364329 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
user_5359 (2018-01-02 06:46:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2018-01-02 07:02:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Pease read for better descripton of your object https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddance
viloan (2018-01-02 05:40:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-01-02 05:54:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
naoliv (2018-01-09 11:42:06+00:00): JJIglesias, usted rompió el límite de Brasil en tus ediciones.
Es necesario cuidado al editar relaciones/límites tan grandes, especialmente cuando se usa iD.
GOwin (2018-01-02 12:45:56+00:00): Is the whole building occupied by 7-Eleven, or just part of it?

If it isn't, you should leave it as a point/node, and tag the structure as a retail building (building=retail), and putthe building's name (if it has any), and not the name of the locator.
schadow1 (2018-01-03 03:17:47+00:00): Made fixes. Please do not duplicate buildings on top of each other. Do not map an area with multiple buildings into a single building. Please terrace buildings if mapping multiple units within a building. Or easier, to just add a node within the building that tags the establishments.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55117136
woodpeck_repair (2018-01-02 10:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55095674.
user_5359 (2018-01-02 07:13:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the wikidata key?
user_5359 (2018-01-02 07:11:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
user_5359 (2018-01-02 08:00:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the higher value entry and replace it with a node?
woodpeck_repair (2018-01-02 10:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55095674.