piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hofgnob (2021-12-21 14:43:19+00:00): I would suggest to only draw the final alignment when it has been politically decided and funding has been allocated. I think it looks quite messy with 4 different routes. The "proposed" tag is usually for projects in planning phase where the final alignment has been selected and construction hasn't started. Look at wiki/railways for more information.
flohoff (2021-12-21 10:38:42+00:00): Hi,
die umbenennung der Straßen war unnötig. Die existieren ja nicht mehr. Deshalb hatte ich die auf razed:highway umgetagged. Ich hatte die aber drin gelassen das die nicht jemand vom Luftbild wieder einträgt.

Defakto ist da aber alles weg.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115173626
Jordi MF (2021-12-21 23:15:59+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM. Por favor, en la etiqeuta "name" no se deben incluir nombres descriptivos como "Casa". Si añades edificios en ruinas, sería conveniente dibujas el contorno y usar las etiquetas area=yes + abandoned:building=yes. La etiqueta "historic=ruins" es usada para lugares históricos que tengan importancia. No creo que estas casas tengan tanto interés como un castillo y, por tanto, yo no usaría esta etiqueta. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=ruins). 
Saludos,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 15:03:07+00:00): Gracias Jordi, gracias a ti, estoy empezando a entender un poco mejor cómo anotar los elementos de un mapa. No es obvio al principio. Atentamente.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-21 13:59:23+00:00): Hi - thanks for adding in that river area!  I noted that you used waterway=riverbank (the riverbank preset in JOSM) rather than natural=water+water=river (the water->river preset in JOSM).  The riverbank tag isn't really used any more (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=riverbank#map).  The iD (in-browser) edtor even prompts users to upgrade the tagging automatically.

Also, I encourage you to join us in chat on Slack, at slack.openstreetmap.us, channels #local-maine and #local-us-northeast

Happy Mapping!
Soshal Distan Singh (2021-12-21 00:36:42+00:00): Пожалуйста, обратите внимание на правильность написания телефонных номеров: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
Т.е., здесь было бы так:
+7 (812) 603-71-61, +7 (812) 676-80-00, +7 (812) 241-72-62
👇👇👇
+7 812 6037161; +7 812 6768000; +7 812 2417262
eggie (2021-12-20 18:50:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Alleen een naam is niet genoeg ook de aard van...  zal benoemd moeten worden.
Kijk even hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lifeguard


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-20 21:42:31+00:00): lifeguard tagging toegevoegd
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-09 19:42:56+00:00): Ved du om de 40 km/h er en zone, som også omfatter sideveje, som Puggårdsvej, Asser Jensensvej og Peder Bøgvad?
DK7080BE (2022-06-10 16:10:41+00:00): de 40 km er "zone maxspeed:advisory";
På Kobbelgårdsvej har jeg ny sat: maxspeed:advisory 40; source:maxspeed:advisory zone;
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2021-12-21 12:17:39+00:00): razed heißt, futsch, wech, kommt nie wieder, wächst jetzt Gras drüber! ;-)
Scout Jens (2021-12-21 15:39:43+00:00): und ich war mir so sicher, als ich gestern dort vorbeikam... Aber ich bin gleich nochmal hin und Du hast ja sowas von Recht! Böser Fehler von mir :-(
eggie (2021-12-22 11:52:47+00:00): Beste Gijs.. Je hebt de landuse op de riotonde verbonden met een administratieve grens.
Wat bedoel je met Nieuwkoop?
Probeer svp concreet aan te geven wat je hebt gedaan.
Ik zie dat de grens inmiddels weer los ligt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115174613
MVG
eggie
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112884081, 112888529, 112889337, 112889625, 112889806, 112891312, 112901887, 112902130, 112902413, 112902555, 112902612, 112906059, 112906316, 112911036, 112911183, 112911212, 112911771, 112915755, 112916591, 112917522, 112918196, 112918241, 112918275, 113142373, 113212338, 113212471, 113212498, 113212507, 113212517, 113255663, 113255706, 113256080, 113258692, 113259534, 113259551, 113259664, 113307698, 113307702, 113353898, 113353900, 113669781, 113856758, 114147939.
mariotomo (2021-12-22 14:19:32+00:00): hola. acuérdate que por lo general se mapean los place como nodos mientras el way que representa la extensión la marcamos con landuse=residential. así como está casi no tiene efecto.
mariotomo (2022-09-17 15:26:51+00:00): lo mejoré en el changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126303411
redd (2023-04-01 12:57:15+00:00): Hi Skywalker,
hier scheint neben Hausnummern noch etwas durchgerutscht zu sein und 2x genus:de=yes unpassend gesetzt. Könntest du das bitte nochmal prüfen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013813565/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013099558/history

vielen Dank,
redd
skywalker1 (2023-04-02 12:11:57+00:00): Hallo redd,
danke für den Hinweis.
Hab es geändert.
Gruß
Sywalker
redd (2023-04-07 21:29:41+00:00): Danke!
Geo-Tobi (2024-08-31 09:46:21+00:00): Hier wurde HW auf footway geändert, gleichzeitig ist aber Traffic sign 240 gesetzt mit bicycle=designated. Das kann nun so nicht stimmen. Bitte um Prüfung.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131912297
danieldegroot2 (2024-09-01 08:57:41+00:00): Restored in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156044443
XimeX (2021-12-26 13:25:29+00:00): Sollten die Parkplätze nicht parking=surface sein? sind ja keine Parkplätze am Straßenrand
ma-rt-in (2021-12-23 12:33:26+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du Haltestellen umbenennst, dann bitte auch die Haltestellen-Relation anpassen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8673119

machst du das noch?

vg
McPomHH (2021-12-23 13:05:17+00:00): Sorry, hatte ich hier tatsächlich vergessen. Ist erledigt (hättest du aber gerne auch direkt erledigen dürfen)
ma-rt-in (2021-12-23 13:07:13+00:00): Vielen Dank.
Marek-M (2024-09-03 07:53:19+00:00): Cześć, co miałeś na myśli oznaczając ten obiekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013819808 jako `office=research`
YazJazz (2024-09-03 16:03:40+00:00): Cześć, to musiała być jakaś pomyłka. Być może chodziło o "source=research".
Dzięki za wychwycenie błędu.
nmombo12 (2021-12-20 17:50:15+00:00): Hello Geoff, thanks for contributing! One request, please attempt to limit the size of changesets to a smaller region so that it can be more easily reviewed. Here is a reference link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115175784
geoffengland (2021-12-21 10:43:13+00:00): Yeah, I'm sorry. This was just an error. Realized what I had done right away. First time making this mistake in over 5 years of mapping.
nmombo12 (2021-12-21 13:44:21+00:00): Great, thank you!
flohoff (2021-12-21 10:41:01+00:00): Moin,
ich bin mir jetzt beim tagging nicht mehr ganz sicher aber ich sehe hier 2-3 Fehler.

Der landuse ist jetzt einfach über dem umgebenden Landuse. Das muss wenn dann über ein multipolygon ausgeschnitten werden.

Das andere ist das ich glaube hier amenity=graveyard besser als landuse=cemetary ist weil der ja IIRC nicht mehr in benutzung ist - oder?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115175934
IlBano (2022-01-27 16:04:45+00:00): Ciao GioFumigalli.
In questo changeset hai introdotto un paio di problemi:
- è stato cancellato un tratto di Corso Buenos Aires/Piazza Argentina
- Via Saverio Mercadante è stata estesa fino alla piazza quando in realtà inizia dopo perchè il primo tratto è Piazza Argentina.
Ho ripristinato la situazione.

Ciao
Patr1k_P (2021-12-21 07:56:20+00:00): a ta lavicka v tvare srdca ma byt kde? Inak tu sa ta kolega nieco pytal, tak treba dat nejaku odpoved..

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114966339

...ak si tam bol, tak treba to napisat
syntex (2021-12-21 11:57:01+00:00): To nie są crossing, zestaw zmian do wycofania
syntex (2021-12-21 11:57:43+00:00): Wycofane
CRCulver (2021-12-21 12:02:38+00:00): A Warsaw mapper has mapped the island portion of crossings as crossing=sidewalk, but this is widely believed to be incorrect (as was recently discussed on Weekly OSM). footway=sidewalk is for ways that run parallel to associated streets. For crossings, both the zebra paint, and the islands, and the portion of the sidewalk that splits off from the footway=sidewalk (since ways are typically traced from the center), the usual tagging is footway=crossing.
CRCulver (2021-12-21 12:59:51+00:00): My apologies. With regard to islands, it looks like we are both wrong. According to the OSM Wiki (footway=crossing), the island portion of crossings should have no footway= tag at all. That is, it should be neither footway=crossing nor footway=sidewalk. 

With regard to the two ends of the crossing, however, I still maintain that these should be footway=crossing, not footway=sidewalk. This is how it is normally mapped around the world, including in Poland. Not only are ways typically traced from their centre, but the way these have been mapped in Warsaw does not accurately describe the ways for the sake of routing engines (the major consumer of these tags).
Lee Carré (2021-12-20 18:37:29+00:00): ▪︎http://www.gov.je/News/2018/Pages/ChasseBrunetClosure.aspx
▪︎http://www.gov.je/News/2019/Pages/LaChasseBrunet.aspx
JeroenvanderGun (2021-12-23 15:47:18+00:00): Handig om te weten: een dergelijk klein "gat" in een aansluiting van autoweg op autosnelweg kun je met highway=trunk + motorroad=no taggen.

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging#Auto.28snel.29wegen

Ik heb het al aangepast.
flohoff (2021-12-21 10:42:29+00:00): Moin,
das tagging von dem weg verstehe ich nicht. 

Mittendrin ein einzelner node mit "access=no" - Steht da ein Schild "betreten verboten"? 

Und wenn der "impassable" ist sollte der weg nicht eher ausgetragen werden?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115176993
SK53 (2021-12-20 19:36:38+00:00): Link to paper on installation of solar panels here.
SK53 (2023-01-13 13:38:25+00:00): Forgot link https://www.sd-commission.org.uk/data/files/publications/Bronllys%20Hospital%20Solar%20Energy%20Project.pdf
tsp15 (2022-01-05 16:21:19+00:00): Zachodnia ścieżka przy Przemszy jest oznaczona C-13/C-16 z kreską poziomą, czyli powinno być "segregated=no". Ścieżka po wschodniej stronie prawdopodobnie   (sądząc po dwóch kolorach kostki) miała być pierwotnie ciągiem pieszo-rowerowym, ale brakuje tam jakiegokolwiek oznakowania.
4004 (2021-12-28 19:31:34+00:00): hi, sorry, but these are not really applicable here
Avocadough! (2021-12-29 19:30:27+00:00): Hi 4004, Thanks for letting me know.
Carto'Cité (2022-02-15 15:23:29+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for the fixes. However I noticed you added the tag public_transport=station on a bunch of railway=station, for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3491814694. This tag is already defined on the station perimeter, here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683881983, and should not be duplicated on the node. 

I've added a note of those nodes, that says "Please do not add the tag public_transport=station, it is already on the way that defines the footprint of the station".

Regards,
Antoine from Carto’Cité on behalf of SNCF #Transilien
julcnx (2021-12-21 01:49:26+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your valuable contributions. Please be aware that Bing imagery in Thailand is mostly outdated and often misaligned. This is why some roads and buildings may look out of place. A better alternative would be Maxar or Mapbox. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74230 for more info. If you have any general or specific questions, feel free to use the forum. Best, Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115177435
eggie (2021-12-20 18:53:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Op een voetpad is bicycle=no al default. Dat hoef je niet toe te voegen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tordans (2021-12-21 19:43:33+00:00): Hi Stefan, können wir an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920008760 noch ein Tagging für Crossing anfügen? Zum Beispiel

```
highway=cycleway
oneway=yes
surface=paving_stones
crossing=unmarked
cycleway=crossing
crossing:island=yes

```
StefanHRT (2021-12-21 20:50:04+00:00): Hi tordans, Das müsste dann ja bei allen Übergängen entlang der Hans-Grade gemacht werden, oder?
rab (2021-12-20 20:32:26+00:00): Vandalism?
eggie (2021-12-20 18:58:25+00:00): Beste delta.. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot.
Beter is het om zoiets in twee keer te doen. 
Schuiven met de kaart in editor iD levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten. 
oneway=no is default en hoef je niet aan wegen toe te voegen.. behalve als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen . Bv een tweerichting fietsrotonde of parallelfietspad. 
Je hebt van een bosperceel een parkeerplaats gemaakt. Ik zal die iets aanpassen in de juiste vorm. 
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2021-12-20 22:29:55+00:00): Please be aware of the warning your edit caused "warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part" needing repair as what you did made the forest disappear from the rendered map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9354116929

cheers
felipeeugenio (2021-12-20 21:14:00+00:00): Estimado, por favor no cambiar categorías de caminos. Por favor consultar con la comunidad este tipo de cambios
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115177797
ZeLonewolf (2022-01-01 20:09:35+00:00): Hi -

There are MAJOR problems with this import you've done of protected areas in Michigan!  We're currently in the process of untangling all the damage here.  First off, do not apply land cover tagging (such as landuse=forest) to protected area boundaries.  Land cover needs to be mapped separately.  Secondly, do not delete accurately-mapped land cover polygons.  Thirdly, there are significant structural issues with the polygons associated with this import, with over 2,000 JOSM validator findings on Michigan protected areas.

Fourthly - imports like this need to be discussed (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) so that these kind of problems can be avoided in the future.

Please cease all importing activities until it's discussed as required.  Discussion on this topic is happening on the channel #local-michigan on Slack (slack.openstreetmap.us) or can be discussed on the talk-us or talk-us-imports mailing list.
abakus_uploader (2021-12-20 23:31:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Zhytomyr (2021-12-20 19:27:24+00:00): Please don't change these nodes to landuse=forest. Changing to fixme=landuse or a complete deletion would be more sensible.
--Dank u wel
marczoutendijk (2021-12-20 20:21:58+00:00): What does landuse=fixme (0xab00 természetes tereptárgy) mean? See the history. 
Landuse always should be on an area, but the original mapper failed to do that.
4004 (2021-12-28 19:36:28+00:00): hi, thanks for splitting the ways, even if I don't agree with this approach. but could you explain these strange links? eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013850984 ? they are not there on the ground, and without turn restrictions at intersections they seem useless
4004 (2021-12-28 19:38:24+00:00): oh, you've also removed turn:lane tags, without adding them on new ways, which is quite sad and I think we need to consider reversion of your changeset
VigotheCarpathian (2021-12-29 20:14:41+00:00): Greetings 4004,
I have deleted the link roads at way 1013850985, way 1013850983, and way 1013850984 which i agree were created in error. Additionally, I updated the lanes: tag on way 615360834, and the lanes: and and turn:lanes: tags on way 630982940 according to Maxar imagery and my best understanding of the lanes: and turn:lanes: pages on the OSM wiki. Since this is a oneway, my read of the wiki is that this way should not have lanes:forward/lanes:backward or turn:lanes:forward tags, only lanes: and turn:lanes: tags.
Thanks for catching this. Please let me know if there are further edits you believe should be made in this area.
4004 (2021-12-30 11:28:49+00:00): Thanks for fixing these. I still think it would've been easier to revert and start anew, but if you want to keep it, please also check lanes and turn:lanes tagging on these ways:
Deleted tag turn:lanes (forward or backward):

left|through|through;right
way 44013363
way 615360834
left|through|through|right
way 630982988
left|through|through|right
way 630982940
through|through;right
way 630982948
left|through|through
way 630982956
way 630982967
way 630982975
way 630982984

You are correct in that forward/backward is needed only where the road mapped is two way
VigotheCarpathian (2021-12-30 23:34:02+00:00): Hello again, 
I've reviewed lanes: and turn:lane data on this section of vulica Voĺhi Solamavaj, paying particular attention to the ways you mentioned, and making frequent reference to Maxar imagery and Mapillary tracks in this area (including the tracks you uploaded in late 2019). Please let me know if I missed anything, or feel free to make any further edits you deem necessary. Thanks again for your time and attention.
4004 (2021-12-30 23:42:20+00:00): thank you for your time - I should've warned you that splitting such a long road like this one into two would be a lot of effort, especially when turn lanes are involved (hence why the local community left them as was). no physical separation meant it wasn't required to split it
abakus_uploader (2021-12-20 23:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Tomas_J (2026-06-24 10:28:47+00:00): Zdar, preco je tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004772185 sidewalk=no? Riesim to teraz pre viac usekov a toto mi pripada, ze chodnik pozdlz cesty ma...
Tomas_J (2026-06-24 10:29:47+00:00): Hi, why you put here way/1004772185 sidewalk=no? I am solving this for more ways now and this one seems to me as a way with separate sidewalk...
jemily1 (2021-12-21 21:42:37+00:00): he cambiado el nombre en catalán de Pasaje Virgen de la Fuensanta: sustituyo "verge" por "mare de deu", en consonancia con las demás calles de este barrio, que tienen nombres parecidos, y en cuyas placas en catalán aparece "mare de deu"
Jordi MF (2021-12-21 21:56:33+00:00): Tienes razón, en catalán se usa la palabra "Mare de Déu" y no "Verge". Gracias!
4004 (2021-12-28 19:39:18+00:00): same comments as on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115178716
VigotheCarpathian (2021-12-29 20:27:46+00:00): Greetings 4004,
I have removed the link roads at way 1013860670, way 1013860672 which, again, i agree were created in error.
4004 (2021-12-30 11:30:39+00:00): Thanks. I don't think links like these https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013860676 make much sense to me either - there is no physical separation from memory, and there certainly isnt that much traffic to require splitting ways
VigotheCarpathian (2021-12-30 23:42:08+00:00): Agreed, i have deleted way 1013860676 and edited the intersection geometry according to Maxar imagery. Thank you.
literan (2021-12-21 14:13:36+00:00): зря вы удалили way27474603 (стройка на Аминьевской). бОльшая часть стройки на месте. Восстановлю. Если не можете скорректировать, не удаляйте.
literan (2021-12-21 14:14:11+00:00): пардон, на Давыдково
literan (2021-12-21 14:15:10+00:00): а, так вы везде стройки поудаляли. Это откат, вандальная правка.
LarsBG (2022-12-03 07:54:59+00:00): Hej b-holdet

Er der en bro her ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013862186

/LarsBG
user_2066394 (2021-12-22 16:45:45+00:00): Kann man die Zufahrt zum Panoramaparkplatz nicht mehr brauchen?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/491068954
friedl (2021-12-22 20:44:19+00:00): Ich würde sagen eher nicht, da es nicht wirklich eine Zufahrt (oder einen eigenen Weg am Parkplatz) gibt, sondern es sich nur um eine Parkbucht handelt.
user_2066394 (2021-12-23 07:07:04+00:00): Ok, müsste man fast noch ummodellieren als Parkbucht.
IlBano (2022-01-27 16:24:31+00:00): Ciao ogeyd e benvenuto in OSM.

Ho apportato un paio di modifiche alla rotatoria che hai inserito (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013865917):
- aggiunto junction=roundabout per evidenziare appunto che è una rotatoria
- modificato i tratti di accesso da highway=secondary_link a highway=secondary. Il tipo *_link non è normalmente da usare sulle rotatorie, a meno che si stia mappando un "peduncolo" che permette un passaggio diretto fra due strade senza passare dala rotatoria stessa...un caso veramente poco frequente.
In caso di dubbi lascia un commento.

Grazie

IlBano
ogeyd (2022-01-28 09:28:32+00:00): ottimo grazie
JeroenHoek (2021-12-21 07:39:40+00:00): Hey,

Libris is een samenwerkingsverband van boekhandels, niet een keten. Voor onafhankelijke ketens zoals Van der Velde betekent dat dat ze samenwerken via o.a. libris.nl, maar dat ze verder onafhankelijk zijn.

Hier lijkt brand=Libris mij daarom niet correct. Voor de Van der Velde keten zou dat brand=Van der Velde moeten zijn. Meestal voeren zij deze ook als name=*. Een uitzondering is Waanders in de Broeren in Zwolle. Daar is het name=Waanders in de Broeren samen met Brand=Van der Velde.
JeroenHoek (2021-12-21 07:41:19+00:00): Voor de Van der Velde vestigingen:

https://www.boekhandelvandervelde.nl/contact
JeroenHoek (2021-12-21 07:49:42+00:00): Voor een samenwerkingsverband als deze zou je network=Libris kunnen overwegen. Zo houd je brand=* vrij voor de branding die de boekhandels daadwerkelijk voeren. Er zullen wellicht boekhandels zijn wel ook Libris als 'brand' voeren, maar veel uit dit lijstje zijn juist zelfstandig (als enkele vestiging of als keten).
user_2066394 (2021-12-20 23:05:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128860901
Der hat jetzt das volle Programm:
tourism=hotel
name=*
disused:tourism=hotel
disused:name=*

Was gilt jetzt?
Bathyscapher (2021-12-23 17:16:38+00:00): Die tags waren bereits auf dem Haus. Ich habe sie lediglich vereint und das Polygon korrigiert (ein Eck war in der Hausmitte). Ein Survey dürfte Klarheit verschaffen.