piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-10-10 00:14:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DressyPear4 (2018-10-10 00:56:19+00:00): HavocBM, melhore sua descrição, colocando apenas um "." não ajuda a identificar o motivo de suas modificações.
HavocBM (2018-10-10 00:58:41+00:00): Só estou melhorando as ruas... por isso nao especifico.
santamariense (2018-10-10 02:25:49+00:00): @HavocBM, então, sugestões de descrição do que foi feito: Alinhadas ruas, nomeadas ruas, melhorando as ruas...
.
Sempre há o que se dizer. Eu também no começo não tinha muita ideia, mas com o tempo a gente vai pegando o jeito.
viloan (2018-10-10 00:29:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
riiga (2018-10-13 18:24:07+00:00): Hej!

Flygbilderna ligger inte alltid rätt, så du bör se till att justera dem så att de ligger rätt. Tryck på Bakgrundsinställningar till höger och rulla ner till "Justera bildplacering" längst ner. Där kan du justera bilden så att den ligger rätt med redan inlagda vägar, istället för att flytta på alla vägar.

Eftersom du av misstag har flyttat på ett stort antal vägar som låg rätt till har jag rullat tillbaka de ändringarna.
seattlefyi (2018-11-01 23:19:50+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Just had a few questions. Can I ask what this changeset is for? It looks like a errant automatic edit, since the oneway tag was rapidly toggled back and forth. Also, why were the changes made at all? It ended up the same as the original. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-10 18:57:52+00:00): #test #failed ?
Alan (2019-04-18 21:36:06+00:00): Is "Belbay" some kind of railroad marker? It's not a locality name that I'm familiar with at all, as a long-time Bellingham resident.
viloan (2018-10-10 01:50:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Rich1234 (2018-10-10 02:55:39+00:00): Hi.  Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

I recommend you try looking at your edit with either the Esri World Imagery or Mapbox Satellite imagery in the background.  Both are significantly better quality images than the Bing images, and if you do, you'll see where the low quality of the Bing images led you to create a building outline that is not quite aligned with reality.
حبيشان (2018-10-19 04:53:06+00:00): لماذا تم إضافة مضلعات لا معنى لها؟
Manal1234 (2018-10-22 02:13:53+00:00): I did not add any blocks for Yemen roads.
These blocks are totally different layer from the roads, they do not have any roads. We only use them as a reference layer to define some areas.
SomeoneElse (2018-10-31 23:33:58+00:00): Hello Manal1234,
Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632352131 etc. are here?  All edits to OpenStreetMap must be verifiable - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability for more information.  If these aren't, we'll have to remove them.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2018-10-31 23:34:17+00:00): مرحباً منال 1234 ،
هل يمكنك توضيح ما https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632352131 وما إلى ذلك؟ يجب أن تكون جميع التعديلات على OpenStreetMap قابلة للتحقق - راجع https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability للحصول على مزيد من المعلومات. إذا لم تكن هذه ، فسنضطر إلى إزالتها.
تحياتي الحارة،
آندي تاونسند ، نيابة عن مجموعة عمل بيانات OSM.
Warin61 (2018-10-14 05:00:47+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove way 400740574 from relation 6015049? This brakes the relation. .. it is for the Chambigne State Conservation Area. 

I do wish your changeset comment said more about what you  are doing.
bunyatbek (2018-11-05 18:01:12+00:00): salom nega maps me ga tusby atr
viloan (2018-10-10 03:40:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muzirian (2020-02-21 12:10:37+00:00): why was segment from node 3669250987 deleted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63365745
Arma IRM-ED (2021-05-27 07:19:29+00:00): Hi muzirian, So sorry I didn't realize there was a message from you. Thank you for fixing what I have done. Happy mapping :)
Durko_freemap (2018-11-08 11:34:19+00:00): Zdravim,
trochu som prekreslil ten kruhac podla kapor-a. Myslite ze to zodpoveda realite? https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=64274733
Vdaka za odpoved. Durko
WalkerB (2018-10-24 16:50:00+00:00): Dear Sharifullah,

You've done an absolutely wonderful job!  You do so much work and it's all really good.  Thank you so much!

Best,

Walker
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-10-10 22:31:06+00:00): hello, why did you delete the swimming pool on this edit?
The_Oak (2018-10-11 04:24:47+00:00): I visited this hotel last month. There wasn't a pool on the east site from the big pool. But it was a secend pool vor children on west side.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-10-11 07:59:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback. Regarding the biggest swimming pool, please remove the tag "sport=swimming" and leave only with "leisure=swimming_pool", that way someone searching for a pool for practicing sport won't be misleaded to go there as it's a leisure pool.

Keep up with the good edits

Nuno Caldeira
chachafish (2019-03-13 14:22:46+00:00): Hello, in this changeset ALBus Salidas Potosi Sucre, was tagged as a bus stop. But, now it has no descriptive tag to indicate what it is. Is this not a bus stop? Thank you :)
5m4u9 (2019-03-14 04:57:38+00:00): NO, 'ALBUS salidas potosi sucre" is a bus station
chachafish (2019-03-14 09:53:24+00:00): Okay, gracias :)
Warin61 (2018-10-18 05:32:35+00:00): Hi,

The roads you add should 'join' to the other roads, not just look like they meet. This is important for computer routers as they need to find where roads join so they can turn into/out of them. 
You have the end of Zenith Place a few meters from Ferdinando St for example. I have joint it up - moved it to Ferdinando and joined it to it.
eggie (2018-10-10 07:30:41+00:00): Dag Nenna,.. Je commentaar ontbreekt bij je edits..
MVG,
Eggie
Jaku103 (2018-10-13 00:16:08+00:00): I made a slight edit to your change and added access tags for foot and bicycle to yes. Per https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/VregQ1CUaVeiMeRTilqQpQ
yaswap (2019-07-10 08:18:35+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the edit and apologies for the delayed response. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

yaswap on behalf of changurl(inactive user)
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:27:13+00:00): You have a building within a building. I think you intended for the larger area to be landuse. I'll make the change. If this is wrong - please fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63368731
R0bst3r (2018-10-10 07:25:03+00:00): Hallo Jonaby,
aus gegebenem Anlass schaue ich mir gerade mehrere deiner Changesets an, folgende Anmerkungen zu diesem:
* Du hast hier eine bestehende Adress-Node geändert und daraus ein Reisebüro mit anderer Adrese gemacht. Die Adresse ist somit verloren. So etwas ist sehr schlechter Stil! Bitte einen neuen Node erstellen mit neuer Adresse. Korrekte Daten nicht mutwillig verfälschen, sondern erhalten! 
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63368791
Internecivus (2018-10-24 17:57:05+00:00): Привіт. Згідно з https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Класифікація_доріг

"Наприклад, основна частина дороги Р-68 (relation 1735963) має статус highway=primary, проте підʼїзд до заповідника "Качанівка" (який також називається Р-68) має статус highway=secondary"

Тобто зміна highway=secondary на highway=primary була некоректною (оскільки цей відрізок Р-68 не з'єднує нічого важливого на кшталт великих міст та/або обласних центрів). А враховуючи критерії з вищезазначеної вікі-сторінки, то навіть до highway=secondary цей відрізок не дотягує. Будь ласка, виправте свої зміни відповідно до критеріїв класифікації.

Дякую.
~Jhellico (2018-10-24 18:06:43+00:00): Я не змінював статусу дороги
Internecivus (2018-10-24 18:13:24+00:00): Дійсно, прошу пробачення. Чомусь при перегляді історії пропустив попередню зміну.
Hjart (2018-10-10 20:18:50+00:00): Bemærk at mindre søer med øer bedst laves som multipolygoner i stil med https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8798535 (en af dine som jeg lige har rettet) og at place=island normalt angiver større beboede øer (se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland#Islands_in_waterways_and_lakes)
R0bst3r (2018-10-10 07:10:17+00:00): Hallo Jonaby,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Wieso sind Adressen keine sinnvollen Informationen? Sie sind nicht am gebäude erfasst, demnach gibt es keinen Grund die Nodes zu löschen. 
* Am besten sollte dieser Änderungssatz revertiert werden.
Zur Einführung empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. Ansonsten wird einem unter forum.osm.org gerne geholfen.
Viele Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63368967
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2018-10-10 07:14:34+00:00): Hallo Jonaby,
gleicher Fall wie Changeset 63368967.
Sollte ebenfalls revertiert werden.
Bitte keine Dinge löschen, die nicht doppelt vorhanden sind!
Danke und Gruß
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63369057
Jonaby (2018-10-10 07:29:05+00:00): Verstehe ich nicht wirklich. Wo steht der Sinn für jedes Haus einen Punkt zu erfassen? Ich mache ja auch keinen Punkt in die Mitte der Strasse mit dem Namen.

Die Adresse ist doch schon auf anderem Weg sichtbar.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63369057
R0bst3r (2018-10-10 07:45:09+00:00): Hallo,
Adressen kann man als Punkte (Nodes) oder am Gebäude (Way) erfassen. Gründe dafür gibt es verschiedene, z.B. Können Gebäude mehrere Adresse haben, dann solte man Nodes verwenden oder ggf. die Hauseingänge mit Adressen versehen.
In diesem Fall wäre es machbar gewesen die Nodes die du gelöscht hast mit dem Gebäude zu verbinden und so die Adresse ans Gebäude zu heften.
Die Adresse ist wirklich nur an den Nodes und dadurch sichtbar! Durch dein Löschen gehen diese Informationen verloren!
Mehr dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen
Nicht unterkriegen lassen! Jeder Anfang ist schwer :D 
Gruß
Jonaby (2018-10-10 08:13:56+00:00): Hast du die Knoten wieder erstellt? Ich sehe Sie beim bearbeiten, aber nicht in der Street-View.

Ich glaube ich habe meinen 'Gedankenfehler' gefunden. Die gelöschten Points waren nur an einigen Häusern. Die habe ich gelöscht da ja eigentlich Hausnummern in StreetView sichtbar. Nun sehe ich, dass Sie in der Street-View fehlen (wahrscheinlich Neubauten). Andere Häuser haben aber 'Hausnummern'. Hängt das zusammen? Oder werden die dann manuell gelöscht wenn in StreetView sichtbar?

Wie mache ich 'revertiert'?

Danke und Gruß
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Warin61 (2018-10-11 05:00:37+00:00): Hi,
Why not make these ponds one area? It would solve problems with overlapping ways. 
If there are gaps between these area they they are not evident in the ways you have put in.
Glenhope1 (2018-10-11 07:17:20+00:00): Yeah, didn't do it right. I wanted to show separate ponds because that shows what they are more clearly. I'll adjust.
Glenhope1 (2018-10-11 09:53:32+00:00): Have a look now. Better?
eggie (2018-10-10 07:29:06+00:00): Dag ab phone..
Is het voor de auto?
.
Voeg eventueel toe voor welke toepassing het oplaadpunt is.
bicycle=yes/no
scooter=yes/no
car=yes/no
truck=yes/no
Kijk op deze wiki pagina of je nog meer info kunt toevoegen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=nl

MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2018-10-10 07:17:40+00:00): Hallo Jonaby,
die hier gelöschte Bank war nicht doppelt eingetragen.
Ein weiterre Kandidat für einen Revert.
Bitte nicht einfach wild Daten aus OpenStreetMap löschen. Du änderst hier direkt die Live-Datenbank wovon sich zahlreiche Anwendungen und Millionen Benutzer mit Daten versorgen!
Gruß
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63369242
muzirian (2018-10-16 08:40:37+00:00): hey looks like DG premuim has more offset and DG standard align more to the gpx tracks around this place.
muzirian (2018-10-16 09:01:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364472822
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-03-06 03:03:47+00:00): Hello muzirian

Sorry for late response, he was our partner. Thank you for bringing this up, you are correct, should be fixed on changesets/67828222. 

Thank you.
muzirian (2021-11-21 10:09:05+00:00): Hi, these still doesnt look like, fixed.
fixing them
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-11-22 01:10:58+00:00): Hi muzirian,
Thank you for your information,
Cheers,
Warin61 (2019-03-27 03:54:28+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your entry. 
The node (single point) you entered has no 'physical properties' in OSM terms so it will not render. I have taken the liberty of expanding it to the building .. which I think is the right one. This will render .. but you should check that I have the correct building!
Warin61 (2019-03-27 03:56:35+00:00): Arr .. deleted... I'll remove the data then.
4004 (2018-10-13 18:20:07+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
ну какие же это станции? удаляем
maraf24 (2018-11-04 11:21:29+00:00): Kolejny wandalizm.
maraf24 (2018-11-04 11:20:49+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2018-11-04 11:20:39+00:00): To też wandalizm.
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:26:10+00:00): Can you add a tag to describe what type of business this is? I'll send you some info on OSM to help you. Good luck.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63370766
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-10 18:58:03+00:00): #test #failed ?
mavl (2019-02-13 16:24:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-10 18:58:25+00:00): #test #failed ?
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Derick Rethans (2018-10-10 09:27:36+00:00): Hey,

this information was already mapped on the Carlton Vale segments itself, such as the cycleway:* tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536184791 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427650 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217789813 — your new segregated lane isn't fully correct, as it's not segregated everywhere — and duplicates information. I would suggest your revert this. The information about Carlton Vale's cycle way already renders "correctly" at for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63371388#map=19/51.53250/-0.20192&layers=C
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
robert (2018-10-13 18:01:02+00:00): BTW - there's a specific tag for postcode (addr:postcode), and there's also a tag (not:name) that can be used to mark a road as specifically _not_ a name (in case someone tries to "fix" it back to match some other dataset. I've made these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63491136
habi (2021-11-18 11:18:30+00:00): Ciao Nemu
Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118491075/ mit `surface=paving_stones` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones) gepflästert, und nicht einfach ein asphaltierter Parkplatz?
Gruss,
habi
nemu (2021-11-22 14:53:19+00:00): Ciao Habi, Ich bestätige, dass es sich um einen Parkplatz handelt. In der App StreetComplete liess sich das nicht direkt anpassen. Danke und frohes Mapping!
nemu
habi (2021-11-22 19:29:30+00:00): Ich hab's in einen Parkplatz umgewandelt.
Ob Pflasterung oder Asphalt ist vom Luftbild her nicht klar, das müsste mal noch 'on the ground' überprüft werden.
Florimondable (2018-10-11 16:04:00+00:00): Bonjour,

Le opposite lane sur E. Varlin est-il utile ?
Non car 
1. il y a déjà oneway:bicycle=no
3. ce n'est pas rendu sur opencyclemap je crois (pas de double fléche)
2. la valeur opposite_lane mélange deux notion l'infra et l'accès, chose qu'il faudrait éviter.
Truchin (2018-10-11 19:12:41+00:00): Je n'ai pas bien compris.
Il y a bien une bande cyclable à contresens non ?
Je ne vois pas comment l'info peut être intégrée à OSM autrement

NB : tu peux demander à opencyclemap de modifier son rendu
Florimondable (2018-10-13 09:34:42+00:00): Autant pour moi, je dis des bêtises. Le opposite_lane ajoute de l'info (dire où se trouve la voie vélo à contre sens).

Par contre, mais c'est difficile de se faire une idée des modifs réellement réalisées. Si je comprend bien tu as modifié le carrefour Varlin/quai de Valmy ?

Est-ce toi qui à supprimer le highway=cycleway sur le pont ? Si oui c'est inutile.
Est-ce toi qui à arrété et repris la piste du quai de Valmy à l'intersection ? Si oui c'est un ajout mineur d'info mais pourquoi pas.
Par contre mettre le bout en intersection en bande cyclable c'est une erreur, il n'y a pas de bande cyclable, il n'y a que des pictos vélo.