piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:39:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:40:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
orhygine (2018-11-01 21:53:15+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution and welcome to OSM! I guess that this information is based on local knowledge and is very interesting. For your second remark about double Montsegu summit, don't hesitate to fix it.
literan (2018-10-29 16:20:56+00:00): не так сделали. Я переделал, гляньте как првильное (и главное: зебр и туканов оставьте для Британии)
freebeer (2018-11-07 15:02:47+00:00): this corner of a building in mass. usa has received tagging intended for Tuebingen, germany.
freebeer (2018-12-10 09:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65336884 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:05:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Константин Гам (2018-12-04 09:22:12+00:00): Зачем вы сместили ряд улиц? В итоге они теперь на здания наезжают
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
freebeer (2018-11-07 15:01:10+00:00): this is not a school in Tuebingen, but part of a street in a small town in southern ohio, and this is v3 of this node that got wrong tagging.
freebeer (2018-12-10 09:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65336833 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
JJIglesias (2018-10-30 06:20:58+00:00): Informacion de este tipo NO ES PARTE de OSM, se pueden registrar edificaciones (casas y edificios) pero NO su uso, propositos o inquilinos. Evitar colocar este tipo de data o sera borrada...
PlaneMad (2019-03-04 06:36:11+00:00): Curious why the platform lines at YPR are tagged as siding. Arent they considered part of the mainline?
Deepak Saravanan (2019-03-04 14:34:44+00:00): Not all lines are sidings. In railways term, the line which runs through the stations are called main lines and Platform lines which start and terminate with in the station yard are called Loop lines. So have marked them as Sidings, which is right as per the wiki knowledge as well. In YPR you can see three lines without siding marking which is intended to be marked as main. two lines towards Chikkabanavara and one towards yelahanka
PlaneMad (2019-03-05 08:58:27+00:00): Just looked at the wiki, it doesnt look like platform lines are considered to be tagged as siding.

Looking elsewhere like UK and Germany, all platform lines are tagged like mainlines https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.47784/-1.89881
Deepak Saravanan (2019-03-09 16:50:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service

Check the picture in this page, it clearly states service=sidng for the lines apart form main lines passing through the station.

Definition for siding is "This tag is used for tracks which run parallel to the main track and are connected to it. These tracks are used by slower trains to be overtaken or to let passengers enter/leave the train if the main tracks do not have platforms. These tracks might be hard to differ from the main tracks in some cases." If no service is marked its by dafault considered as main line, but there is clear difference when you mark the sidings.
PlaneMad (2019-03-09 18:30:25+00:00): Got it, seems like a lot of tracks i've tagged as sidings in the past should actually be service=yard. 

Thanks, will keep this in mind in future.
kreuzschnabel (2019-06-03 07:38:01+00:00): Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37849456: Ein service=driveway ist nach meinem Verständnis (das natürlich kein Evangelium ist) ausschließlich eine Auffahrt aus dem öffentlichen Verkehrsraum zu einem privaten Grundstück. Das ist hier nicht der Fall, es ist Anfahrt zu einem öffentlichen Parkplatz sowie einer Gastwirtschaft und Zuwegung eines markierten Wanderweges.
ma-rt-in (2019-06-03 07:39:18+00:00): Hallo,
das servie driveway kannst du ruhig entfernen, ich persönlich nutzte es seit monaten nicht mehr.
vg
kreuzschnabel (2019-06-03 07:48:53+00:00): Ich möchte dich nicht nerven, und es geht mit auch nicht speziell um diesen einen Weg. Es geht mir in solchen Kommentaren darum, Grundsätzliches anzusprechen – hier ein eventuelles Missverständnis des driveway-Tags. Der Router findet’s zwar, aber auf osm-carto ist selbst in Zoomlevel 15 noch nicht erkennbar, wie man den Hof überhaupt anfahren kann, da sind nur die Tracks zu sehen. Das empfinde ich nicht als Gewinn für das Projekt.
ma-rt-in (2019-06-03 07:50:50+00:00): Nerven tust du nicht, da gibt es "schlimmere" User. Danke für den Hinweis und ich weiß auch was du meinst. Der Key service in Zusammenhang mit hw=service ist noch sehr ausbaufähig, gerade im deutschen Verständnis.
orhygine (2018-11-01 22:19:14+00:00): Hello, you have requested review for that contribution so I would like to have a look at your modification. Those buildings exist on the french cadastre so I have replaced the geometries with cadastre ones. Thanks for your contribution.
Linkid (2018-11-02 10:15:35+00:00): Thanks for your help :).
However, I noticed the next day that there is a bridge between the two buildings, while there isn't in the cadastre.
orhygine (2018-11-02 11:06:30+00:00): Your welcome. Exact there is a bridge. We can see in Ortho Toulouse 2017 imagery that the bridge is smaller than currently drawn. Unfortunatly, that imagery is not available still in IdEditor. You can see it into JOSM... or I do the update if you want. We're talking about some details here but it's the occasion to be accurate...!
orhygine (2018-11-02 11:07:16+00:00): Also wall=no can also be added on the bridge if it's the case?
Linkid (2018-11-02 13:24:21+00:00): I'm adding photos in Mapillary, if you want to see this new building : https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/86V4WyA7CebaEbZQTJRy0Q ;).
orhygine (2018-11-05 21:02:36+00:00): Seen, perfect. So no need for wall=no tag.
abakus_uploader (2018-10-29 23:30:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
flohoff (2018-10-31 10:29:02+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier vermute ich doppelte nodes entfernt. Aber es wäre schön wenn du dir das mal genauer ansehen würdest. Das ist ein Dreieckiges Gebäude mit leisure track und einem bicycle parking von einem neumapper gemacht. 

Das ist total verunglückt. Ich werde den original mapper mal anschreiben was das werden sollte.

Flo
ulmtuelp (2018-10-31 10:45:58+00:00): Ja, nur zu :)
SP!KE (2018-12-14 20:16:35+00:00): I don't see paths in satellite imagery for what you have traced as paths.  Why did you trace these and should they be removed?
rab (2018-12-16 12:38:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64164549
gurglypipe (2018-10-29 15:46:23+00:00): Nice. It’s also useful to add the FHRS (Food Hygiene) ID to takeaways and other food places, which lets us check the address. See https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-13.html. For Foo Wing, the FHRS data is at http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/267603/, and it says it’s at number 15, not number 13. What’s the correct building number?

I added the FHRS ID and tweaked the phone number formatting in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63982559, but have not touched the building number.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63978290
mavl (2019-02-20 16:27:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
FredrikLindseth (2018-10-29 20:33:21+00:00): Veldig bra. Det er rett. Det eneste er at nå er det to barnehager der. Ett par meter lenger nord, inne i bygget er det en barnehage som heter "marineholmen barnenhage", burde slått de to sammen
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-02-21 17:28:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-21 17:28:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
gurglypipe (2018-10-29 15:41:41+00:00): The more conventional tag name for this would be alt_name, rather than name_1: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63979347
gurglypipe (2018-10-29 15:44:31+00:00): I tweaked it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63982559
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63979347
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-11-04 11:36:39+00:00): Are you sure that shape of for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639100048 is OK?

I am not sure why this shape was used - I see not object in this shape on Bing aerial images.
SHARCRASH (2018-11-12 09:29:52+00:00): Bonjour, veuillez remarquer que l'emplacement des n° de maisons que vous avez crées sont fortement imprécis, par exemple: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6022411115/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6022411115/history
Je sais que cette région est assez imprécise car il y a eu des imports non rectifiés de la base de données du cadastre.

Créer des points (nodes) indépendants qui contiennent les tags d'adresse pour chaque maisons c'est assez excessif. Chaque bâtiment n'a qu'une seule adresse, on peut donc le mettre directement sur le bâtiment même. Crée des nodes indépendants est surtout utile lorsqu'il y a plusieurs entités sur un même élément. Par exemple, plusieurs magasins dans un centre grand commercial... Faire autant de nodes surcharge les données serveur et quelqu'un risque aussi de déplacer le node hors de son élément. 

D'ailleurs comme dit ci-haut, vos placements  hors de chaque maison sont assez confus aussi. Etes-vous certain que la position de vos images sat. comme référence ont été rectifiées?
SHARCRASH (2018-11-12 09:30:47+00:00): Rectification pour le 2e exemple:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6022411238/history
SHARCRASH (2018-11-12 09:36:06+00:00): Pour revenir à la région imprécise, ce serait bénéfique que ses contributeurs fasse de leur mieux pour rectifier cette imprécision des données OSM...
Globeur (2018-11-14 11:10:49+00:00): Bonjour Sharcrash,

En effet les données sont plus ou moins imprécises, comme sur les exemples cités. 
L'import a été effectué de la base BANO (venant en partie du cadastre).
Dans le raisonnement je trouve il est mieux d'avoir une adresse (plus ou moins précise mais souvent placés à quelques mètres des entrées que de rien avoir sur des rues pouvant être longues).

Le travail serait à poursuivre en intégrant les adresses aux bâtiments ou en les plaçant sur la surface du bâtiment pour augmenter la précision. 

Honnêtement je n'ai pas le temps, etant en etudes et dans des associations de réaliser ces tâches....
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-30 02:17:39+00:00): Looks like this was left entirely untagged.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63979856
freebeer (2018-11-07 14:58:29+00:00): actually, *this* changeset added threatre tags, including mysterious mention of JOSM, to a railway line node.  the one following does not obviously seem to have done anything.

this type of bug appears to be present every dozen or two changesets submitted by this apparent gateway.
freebeer (2018-11-07 14:54:03+00:00): this changeset has added Tuebingen theatre tagging to a node of an old railway line in new york state.
freebeer (2018-11-07 15:18:41+00:00): The intended recipient for this tagging appears to be the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247445176 .  However, while it seems probable that all but 8 of the edited objects are probably nodes, that one is a building polygon, and its properties have been added to the node of the same number as shown below.

A simple logic bug, not sure why it was not caught in the testing done on the osm production database before now.
freebeer (2018-12-10 08:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65336203 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway
mueschel (2018-10-31 12:17:45+00:00): Hi,
could you check this relation? Something went wrong with the tagging:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8862132

Jan
Tupikov Andrey (2018-11-03 22:57:55+00:00): Hello!
Looked over again. It's as if everything is fine. What is the question?

Andrey
mueschel (2018-11-09 17:57:38+00:00): I removed the relation I linked above today.
viloan (2018-10-29 14:55:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-02-21 17:28:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-29 16:01:37+00:00): leisure=garden is for large recreational/leisure gardens like depicted here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

While grass and trees in residential areas is called "gardens" - it is a totally different thing. I bet there are no leisure gardens in Mažaičiai.
dktue (2018-10-29 15:08:08+00:00): Gut zu wissen, dass es shop=ironing gibt :-)
Velosoph (2018-10-29 15:13:46+00:00): Ja, danach habe ich gerade erst im OSM-Forum gefragt gehabt, da mir was Besseres auch nicht einfiel. Siehe

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=722871
osmviborg (2018-10-30 10:20:12+00:00): Please don't modify/move the address nodes.
Addresses in Denmark are imported from an official database and maintained automatically.
mavl (2019-02-21 17:28:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Allison P (2020-04-16 05:47:08+00:00): Where did you get the name from? I've always known the canal as Powell Lateral.
bcparker21 (2020-04-16 14:03:51+00:00): Planning documents to put a pedestrian path and bridge between Albion and Cassia Park along the canal (which you should let your elected officials know that you support).
https://www.cityofboise.org/media/4711/cenetralbench.pdf Pages 32 & 34

http://centralrim.idahohistory.org/?page_id=16
Allison P (2020-04-16 14:24:25+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I'll add Powell Lateral as an old name for the canal.
viloan (2018-10-29 15:28:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-10-29 18:00:45+00:00): Dag Taco.. Je hebt de maxspeed in deze binnenstraten van 30km/h op 50 km/u gezet. wat is je bron in deze?
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2019-05-24 23:12:37+00:00): Hello TwesigyeFredrick,
This looks like part of an import that never got off the ground.  Does it need tidying up?  
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 12:22:12+00:00): No reply, so I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63982363 .
mavl (2019-02-21 17:28:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
RicoElectrico (2018-10-29 17:47:56+00:00): Cześć,

To mi nie wygląda na park, co najwyżej trawnik / zadrzewienie:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639109876

https://goo.gl/maps/R6JQtYkyeSs
Rom1 (2021-08-27 20:41:29+00:00): Bonjour, à partir de quelle source avez-vous ajouté ce parking à vélo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6022656887 il y a 3 ans ? J'habite à proximité, je suis allé vérifié et il n'y a rien. Merci !
ripouille (2021-08-29 06:44:23+00:00): Bonjour, c'était à partir du fichier des abris vélo de gare et connexion puis vérification sur l'ortho via map contrib. Mais je pense qu'effectivement il y a eu confusion entre projet jamais réalisé et réalité. Je vais le retirer, désolé pour ça
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-29 17:09:40+00:00): Sidewalks, which are right at the side of a road (not separated by a physical barrier) are not mapped with a separate vector lines.
mavl (2018-10-30 17:22:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за участие в проекте OpenStreetMap. Просто для информации. Вы делаете ошибки:  
- здания непрямоугольные;
- некоторые здания добавлены прямо на дорогу (имеют с ней общие точки), например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639291628  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы взяли адресные данные.
deuzeffe (2018-10-31 11:26:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez modifié une numérotation de bâtiment, à la demande des locataires, ce qui est tout à fait pertinent. En revanche, vous n'avez pas respecté les conventions d'identification d'osm. Il y a donc maintenant :
- deux numéros 18 dans la rue H. Tazieff
- un bâtiment avec une adresse complète, ce qui est inutile puisque la voie, la commune, le CP etc. sont hérités des données de la base (limite administrative, par ex.)
- un bâtiment avec 2 points donnant la même information, le n°.

J'ai toujours eu un pb avec la numérotation de ce lotissement, car la numérotation n'est pas sur le cadastre :/

À votre disposition pour en discuter et coopérer.