piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-04-24 02:51:00+00:00): name:Het is overbodig om met MAPS.ME een tag name:nl toe te voegen, dit doet in Nederland niets.
(Behalve in Friesland, waar vaak Friese namen de officiële naam zijn.)
Dino Michelini (2017-05-01 16:08:30+00:00): Ciao ho visto che hai modificato i tag dei confini del parco di Bracciano-Martignano inserendo una strada secondaria che non esiste. Ho cancellato il tuo tag. Per favore quando mappi non fare casini. Grazie
Privits (2017-06-07 17:18:21+00:00): Grazie di aver corretto se c'era qualcosa di sbagliato. La reazione scontrosa, pur se educata, non mi è piaciuta molto, ma l'importante è che la mappa sia corretta. Buona serata.
AgusQui (2017-05-29 03:05:01+00:00): Hola Danieltorales, acá agregaste una parada de la linea 5, sin embargo ésta línea no pasa por esta zona ¿habrás querido decir el ramal 5 de alguna otra línea?
Por otro lado, el cafe que se llama Casa ¿no será tu casa verdad?
muralito (2017-05-12 02:41:28+00:00): Aflojale a la birra, por lo menos antes de mapear... :-)
Ya te lo reviertieron.
Beerforfree (2017-05-14 02:50:18+00:00): borre las lineas de interpolacion que pasaban varias cuadras y corregi el canal
Warin61 (2019-11-19 22:19:02+00:00): Hi,
Gymnasium 1 has been tagged sport=motor .. I have changed this to sport=gymnastics as I assume this was miss tagged.
KR-KRKR-KR (2019-11-20 21:17:26+00:00): Hi
i assume you talking about this object:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/99447226

Thanks a lot!
btw, the "sport=motor" tagging cames not from me, if you check the history of the object in detail, then you could see that user "https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jpanther" did add the "sport=motor" via changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7271448

happy mapping!
kr
Supaplex (2017-04-24 04:11:32+00:00): 站體的部分因為高度不同，可能得拆成三部分:北側，路上和南側建築
catdreamer (2017-04-24 04:38:17+00:00): 收到，下班後連同東湖站，一併處理。
catdreamer (2017-04-24 10:55:57+00:00): 已修改,如需改進,請再指點,謝囉!
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:24:15+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mapeiro (2017-04-24 16:57:09+00:00): Olá,

Por favor escreva comentários que espliquem brevemente as modificações feitas. "14" não significa nada.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-04-24 05:53:33+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you are mistaken with the guesthouse POI. Number 16 Hartley Ave is on the other side of the road and further north. Also I think East Ham (which is the area) is possibly not the proper name of the guest house.

Could you please rectify this problem? Thanks.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Chetan_Gowda (2017-04-24 08:58:15+00:00): Hi Jerolli, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's a map of the real world, so we should map what is there on the ground. You added a park, paths, and residential road which does not exist on Bing and Mapbox imagery. Could you please fix this?
Jerolli (2017-04-24 21:34:01+00:00): That park is real. I live in Llíria and you can see it on sources like Google Maps. I'm starting the editing of maps and if I've done anything wrong I'll try to correct it. My apologies
Chetan_Gowda (2017-04-25 07:31:31+00:00): Hi Jarolli, Thanks for getting back. As I didn't noticed park and road in imagery. I left a comment and deleted. I will revert my edits. My apology to you.

Happy mapping,
Chetan
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-04-24 02:20:15+00:00): Please only add features that can be verified. The footpaths don't belong in OSM when they cross a building. 

Do you have some verification that the park you added is not just some green space? Is it listed in the city's directory of parks?
Jaku103 (2018-03-04 06:49:31+00:00): I was just looking at that park wondering if it is really there. I'll get out there and verify it soon. It is posible this city is known for parks and trails. With lots of little parks all over the place.
neuhausr (2017-09-12 16:21:49+00:00): In this changeset, you added two place=neighbourhood nodes, but no name or other information. Please add that if you know it, or consider removing them if the tag doesn't fit (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood)
Viajero Perdido (2017-04-24 01:06:34+00:00): ...and de-tertiary'd CanVec roads, the usual.
Alecs01 (2017-04-29 12:39:48+00:00): Reverted
bhousel (2017-04-24 20:42:14+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
AndriesWijma (2017-04-24 19:28:16+00:00): Voetgangersstraat is bedoeld voor een weg/straat die door bebording of obstakels alleen voor voetgangers is bedoeld ondanks de breedte. Dus niet voor de normale 'smalle' paden zoals stoepen. Het pad langs het plein moet dus zijn Voetpad (footway) of Stoep. De doorsteek tussen d'Hondecoeterstraat en Van Blomstraat lijkt door bebording aangegeven als fietspad en is dus ook zeker geen voetgangersstraat.

Graag reactie.
Commodoortje (2017-05-01 14:37:46+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488971416
Kun je wat uitleg geven over het "plein" dat je hebt aangebracht?
Een stukje klinkers in een woonwijk lijkt mij nog geen plein.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plein
Tevens heb je het plein dubbel aangebracht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4765946673
AndriesWijma (2017-05-08 15:56:11+00:00): Helaas geen reactie van Argai en dus geen mogelijkheid om te overleggen. Ik heb vandaag een survey gedaan in deze wijk en heb nu naar eigen inzicht aanpassingen doorgevoerd: uitlijning verbeterd, diverse tags veranderd, paden toegevoegd, overbodige stoepen verwijderd, plein verwijderd.
andi9876 (2017-04-29 02:04:35+00:00): Dear, please stop add viewpoints
andi9876 (2017-04-29 02:05:36+00:00): Dear, please stop add viewpoints. Remember, this is for everybody visible!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:25:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
os-emmer (2024-02-28 19:33:06+00:00): Hi TheOldMiner,
is this a station of the Queensland SES?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488980290
tonyf1 (2017-04-24 08:37:45+00:00): Hi. You appear to be mapping the underground stormwater drainage system. Maybe they would be best tagged as man_made=pipeline rather than waterway=drain considering that they are underground. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
tonyf1 (2017-05-11 07:05:40+00:00): Hi, you quote Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map. Is this your source for all these drains? Is its licence compatible with OSM?
aharvey (2017-05-11 11:16:37+00:00): @Spookylad, it doesn't seem the license of your source is compatible. Unless you can point us to further details about the license, could you please revert these changes and instead add data from ground survey or other sources which can be used in OSM.
Spookylad (2017-05-12 06:48:25+00:00): Sorry I didn't have much time to review and finish the details. I removed the non park drainways, and I will continue to map Empress Park correctly. The drainways from the park are a mixture of Tunneled and underground/hidden. How do I go about tagging each of those aspects appropriately? I can take photos if more info is needed.
tonyf1 (2017-05-13 00:08:30+00:00): Thanks for your reply. 

You should delete anything that is not compatible with OSM's licence conditions. 

Reading the wiki, I don't think that drain or culvert are the right tag. man_made=pipeline location=underground substance=water seems the best fit but I haven't seen what's on the ground.

Way: 489841972 looks like an access cover from the satellite, maybe remove the water tag and add man_made=yes surface=concrete?

The features you mapped have a direction, please check they match the flow direction.

When in doubt, you can ask at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/ where I have already started a discussion.

Thanks for your contributions, please keep contributing
Osm1980 (2017-07-30 18:40:01+00:00): sala in noghati ke gozashyid noghate naghshebardarieh?
oba510 (2017-04-24 05:13:31+00:00): There was already an existing relation for the Bay Trail. ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/325779/ ) I've merged these members into that one.
nvk (2017-04-24 06:22:38+00:00): Thank you! I saw the other one but could never get the two to associate in the same iD editor view. Did you use JOSM?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
neuhausr (2017-05-08 19:09:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I noticed that in at least some of the places where you added sidewalks, you did not connect them to other features that were already on the map (such as streets or other sidewalks). For things like routing, this is important. On the other hand, it is not important to connect sidewalks to other features like park boundaries. Happy mapping!
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-09 23:40:59+00:00): Hi, ArizonaMapper. I added bridge on highways (way 488992080) because it's crossing with waterway
mbethke (2017-04-24 09:03:52+00:00): Hi,
sorry, had to delete your mapping of L'Atmosphère as it was a duplicate. It takes a while for new Points of Interest to show up in MAPS.ME - usually they update the maps on a monthly basis. If you want to check if something is mapped yet, you can search for it on the web at http://osm.org.
BTW, I had mapped the Atmo as a pub, seeing as most people seem to come for music, drinks and socializing as opposed to dining. If that doesn't fir with your new concept after moving, just click "edit" on the map and change the type of the existing POI to "restaurant" again.
Cheers,
Matthias
Warin61 (2017-05-11 23:12:17+00:00): Altered relation 7165413 - residential. Removed crossing ways. 
I used the LPI base map that has the legal boundaries of the residential properties.  There has been talk of better mapping by mapping residential areas by blocks... the road ways are landuse=highway.... I'm not going that far .. but I do remove the crossing of the ways.
PlaneMad (2017-04-27 10:03:18+00:00): Nice work with all the details!
trigpoint (2017-04-24 19:19:45+00:00): Stirling Castle is already mapped in great detail, a node doesn't add anything so I am reverting this edit.
5m4u9 (2017-04-25 14:36:38+00:00): gracias por la actualización, recorrí la vía antes de la nueva carretera y después con la nueva, en ambas dejé la trazas gps. tenía pendiente actualizar.

mi duda está en el sector que cambió a la nueva vía, ésos caminos se destruyeron? ya no sirven? quizá siguen ahí y como caminos de ripio quizá habría que dejarlos. (todo suposiciones si todavía existen)
mweper (2017-04-24 13:19:21+00:00): Hola cachilo100fire. Te recomiendo para un mejor etiquetado, usar también la etiqueta amenity=place_of_worship (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=place_of_worship) junto con building=chapel (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building=chapel).
-
Si el PDI a marcar se puede representar con una simple área, no se debe/no es necesario agregar una relación (se duplicarían datos), por favor, elimina la relación.
-
Al añadir el nombre, por favor trata de no abreviar palabras, no colocar la categoría en el nombre y si el lugar no tiene nombre o no lo conocen, no se lo agregues. Otro mapeador identificará el faltante de nombre y lo corregirá (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres).
-
Cualquier duda que tengas, me puedes contactar.
eggie (2017-04-24 08:13:26+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-24 08:14:14+00:00): Ik heb twijfel op tourism=attraction wel de goed tag is voor een vereniging. club?
Jan Westerhof (2017-04-24 15:38:12+00:00): Ik vind het ook niet een juiste tag. Als ik zoek naar toeristische attracties in de buurt, wil ik dit liever niet in het lijstje tegenkomen.
Tag 'office=association' (verenigingskantoor) lijkt beter. Aannemende dat er iets als een gebouw is, natuurlijk.
Wat is er eigenlijk precies op die lokatie?
Is het een stuk grasland? Is het dan een optie om de tags 'landuse=grass' te combineren met 'name='Motorveld Modelvliegclub etc'?
apm-wa (2017-07-27 05:23:18+00:00): Ýoda refers to a pedestrian path, and Ylham ýodasy is used for vehicular traffic.  Is this correct, or should it be Ylham geçelgesi?  Ýoda означает пешеходный путь, а на Ylham ýodasy ездят машины.  Название правильное, или должно быть Ylham geçelgesi?
lwsmsk20 (2017-04-24 06:13:02+00:00): Freibad bleibt bis Sommer 2018 geschlossen
Nakaner (2017-04-24 13:30:24+00:00): Hallo lwsmsk20,

auch wenn das Freibad diesen Sommer geschlossen ist, rechtfertigt das eine völlige Löschung nicht. Ist dir bewusst, wie viel Aufwand es war, die ganzen Details einzutragen? Darüber hinaus wird es nur eine Frage der Zeit sein, bis jemand kommt und es anhand der Bing-Luftbilder wieder einträgt, weil es "fehlt".

In solchen Fällen ist das Verwenden von Tags entsprechend dem Lifecycle-Tagging-Schema angebracht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Das heißt, aus leisure=water_park wird disused:leisure=water_park.

Oder man taggt das Gelände als landuse=construction und ergänzt note="Schließung wegen Umbau bis Frühjahr 2018".

Da du hoffentlich ortskundiger bist, möchte ich dich bitten, in der Sache Stellung zu nehmen, was denn nach dem Umbau noch so sein wird, wie es vorher war.

Viele Grüße

Michael
patzi (2017-05-04 09:23:43+00:00): Moin,
ich habe mal die alten Sachen mit entsprechendem Lifecycle-Präfix wieder hergestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48388564
Es waren bereits auch wieder alte Objekte neu erzeugt mit removed als Ergänzung.
Eduard Popov (2017-05-12 06:43:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы по ошибке сильно сдвинули все точки этой реки http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76080888. Пожалуйста, исправьте.
Kostik (2017-05-12 13:21:06+00:00): Добрый день. Откатил.
EneaSuper (2017-04-24 09:16:12+00:00): Bisogna ricordarsi di aggiornare le denominazioni delle rotatorie quando le modificheranno.
bubix (2017-04-26 09:55:29+00:00): Hai proprio ragione! Comunque non so se l'Ufficio Toponomastica fa denominatoola nuova rotonda "Scoglio dell'Oca" o se il Municipio ha messo solo la targa...
EneaSuper (2017-04-26 15:24:50+00:00): Se non erro, quando tutti i lavori di riqualificazione urbana e viaria del quartiere saranno terminati le rotatorie verranno rinominate.
bubix (2017-04-26 15:37:26+00:00): Ok. Ottimo!
VA00 (2017-04-27 21:36:31+00:00): Dodawanie spływu kajakowego (?) jako drogi dla rowerów jest co najmniej dziwaczne. Jeżeli chodziło o wprowadzenie do OSM spływu rzeką Warta, to najlepiej nie rysować osobnej linii (i tak pokrywa się z przebiegiem rzeki), tylko dodać szlak kajakowy jako relację do rzeki.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:17:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-04-24 17:05:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-04-24 07:34:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé , nous avons eu un bug qui a fait déplacer malencontreusement le point, je vous remercie de nous l'avoir signalé

Cordialement,