piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-07-24 05:37:16+00:00): De sluisdeur wat opgeschoven.. sluiskolk update gegeven.
MVG
eggie
Bart- (2022-07-24 08:38:58+00:00): eddy, dankjewel voor je tips en voor je hulp bij mijn edit!
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 12:25:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132218339
Twój AED został przeniesiony a potem usunięty. Zweryfikuj te zmiany :sus:.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-02 10:00:08+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3295130 and answer it?
okwithmydecay (2024-03-13 21:09:15+00:00): Have there been any updates on the proposed cycle way on Queen's Walk in Green Park? When I surveyed it today, there was signage indicating no cycling
MacLondon (2024-03-14 10:39:09+00:00): None as far as I know. I know Westminster have hinted at some E-W route(s) via Mayfair and a route to Soho, but they don't seem to have specified how and whether previously indicated alignments have been changed.

I wouldn't really expect Queen's Walk to be changed until there's a route developed between Mayfair and Green Park. It potentially might never happen (though full cycle network wasn't intended to be finished till 2041)... but they'd presumably develop an alternative parallel route further east if no route goes along Queen's Walk.
oba510 (2022-07-24 01:20:17+00:00): Hi, I don't believe these are accessible to the public; according to the bside article linked this is inside a private home. Nothing is visible from the street.  

Pauline Kael obviously doesn't live here anymore; do you know if there's anything outside identifying this house as the "Pauline Kael Residence"? (a sign or a plaque for example?)  Also, the start_date tag on the house is obviously wrong - nobody was building houses like this in the 1950s.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-24 14:28:39+00:00): Currently the house is closed to public tours as they are renovating the house and restoring the paintings. According to the owner and Jess Foundation it will be open to public tours via reservations after 2024 when it is expected to be completed. 

There is a small plaque outside used as part of the many walking tours organized by multiple art and historical societies in Berkeley. There’s and e-plaque to go along with it. Currently, all visitations are done through the Jess Foundation. 

Start date is a typo I can fix. 1905 is when the house was built. 

On a personal note. I am finding the attitude you mods have is very counter productive. I understand you’re all highly protective of this space, but please more professionalism is requested. Thanks.
Allison P (2022-07-27 03:10:06+00:00): This is a private residence, it should not be marked. The website you added is not an official site either, so it has been removed as well.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:18:57+00:00): It is a private residence with historical designation and tourist attraction. There are hundreds of links with same designation. Please advise which tags are proper for these kinds of buildings. I want to be consistent with the many historical m/tourist attraction homes. thanks
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:39:47+00:00): No tags are permissible. OpenStreetMap is for what exists on the ground. I couldn't find any evidence that this is considered historic by any actual authority. There is seemingly no on-the-ground presence (others have said you need to be invited in for it to be appropriate), so it should not be marked. We are not Google Maps or any other site. Just because they mark it one way doesn't mean we do. If I found out my home was once used for filming an old TV show I would not let it be marked because I would not let people tour it and wouldn't want them to come visit.

If the residence is no longer in use and has been turned into a tourist attraction, then it would be appropriate. If it is considered historic by the government, that is also acceptable. But if a bunch of people wanted to check out your home even though you didn't want them to and it's only set up for you to live in, it would not be okay to tag. It is not okay for whomever lives here now.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:48:36+00:00): But I took a tour that guided me there as an attraction. Why would your personal preference for how you would want to tag a home a consideration I should take? I literally have the Historical Socitey of Detroit tour guide pamphlet highlighting this and other Motown Homes. If you look at the map there are other historical Motowns homes within this same area.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:49:48+00:00): https://detroithistorical.org/learn/encyclopedia-of-detroit/franklin-aretha
ovruni (2022-07-24 01:40:18+00:00): Hola Jeanfranco 1415, gracias por contribuir a OSM. El uso de la etiqueta de edificio se encuentra destinada a edificios individuales, no para áreas que contienen otros edificios, por lo que he retirado ese edificio grande. Por otra parte, en caso un edificio tenga formas rectas puede encuadrar el edificio con la letra Q. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad de OSM en Perú. 
Saludos
Frans S (2022-08-01 13:17:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
s




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123993897
MxxCon (2022-07-24 18:17:52+00:00): I'm not sure if it's a good idea to map "unmarked" crossings since afaik by rules you are not allowed to cross there..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123994016
yoasif (2022-07-24 18:24:40+00:00): pedestrians have the right of way at all crosswalks - https://www.ny.gov/pedestrian-safety/additional-information 

if you look at the satellite imagery, you will also see that there is tactile paving as well so it is even more obvious that crossings are allowed.
MxxCon (2022-07-24 18:32:28+00:00): Then every single intersection would have to be marked 😕
Hon約 (2022-07-24 06:12:25+00:00): 你有同盟村的边界？
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-27 21:51:37+00:00): strange name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9906835726
MxxCon (2022-07-24 18:37:19+00:00): This bus stop name is correct, but its locatio should be further south https://bustime.mta.info/#306558
i'll update it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123994795
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Ravrol (2022-08-11 08:27:04+00:00): Changeset enthält leider mehrere kritische Änderungen, die so sicher nicht gewollt waren...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
literan (2022-07-24 19:48:05+00:00): fake buildings, they already demolished (look at Maxar imaging).
Revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
JJIglesias (2022-07-24 04:21:34+00:00): Hi. You are adding buildings as per Microsoft Building Footprints, but those footprints are OLDER than the actual existing buildings, there is no consistency between the "suggested" Rapid data and the "REAL" data available in more current imagery like Maxar. Please STOP adding buildings in that Way. We do not want false data in the map just because the AI suggest it. You are suppouse to be a VALIDATOR, and not just add data blindly.

Please follow the rules required by RAPID to add data.

Unfortunally most of your added data may need to be reverted. 

Please review and advise

Thanks
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-24 04:22:33+00:00): Hi. You are adding buildings as per Microsoft Building Footprints, but those footprints are OLDER than the actual existing buildings, there is no consistency between the "suggested" Rapid data and the "REAL" data available in more current imagery like Maxar. Please STOP adding buildings in that Way. We do not want false data in the map just because the AI suggest it. You are suppouse to be a VALIDATOR, and not just add data blindly.

Please follow the rules required by RAPID to add data.

Unfortunally most of your added data may need to be reverted. 

Please review and advise

Thanks
JJ
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
JJIglesias (2022-07-24 04:21:17+00:00): Hi. You are adding buildings as per Microsoft Building Footprints, but those footprints are OLDER than the actual existing buildings, there is no consistency between the "suggested" Rapid data and the "REAL" data available in more current imagery like Maxar. Please STOP adding buildings in that Way. We do not want false data in the map just because the AI suggest it. You are suppouse to be a VALIDATOR, and not just add data blindly.

Please follow the rules required by RAPID to add data.

Unfortunally most of your added data may need to be reverted. 

Please review and advise

Thanks
JJ
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
abakus_uploader (2022-07-24 22:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hon約 (2022-07-24 06:06:47+00:00): 悦城西社区、瑞都社区、悦城东社区归红角洲街道
Hon約 (2022-07-24 06:07:20+00:00): 红角洲街道办事处所在地在站西花园社区
Hon約 (2022-07-24 06:10:37+00:00): 红角洲街道与卫东街道分界线在前湖大道
Hon約 (2022-07-24 06:46:27+00:00): 朱岗村划到了界外
maraf24 (2022-07-24 10:37:49+00:00): Obrysy były prawidłowe.
Zmiany wycofane.
lcmortensen (2022-07-24 06:08:23+00:00): Why is SH 21 a trunk road? NZTA defines it as a non-strategic arterial route, similar to nearby SH 26 and SH 39.
lcmortensen (2022-07-24 06:13:44+00:00): https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/projects/road-efficiency-group/docs/onrc-north-island-map.pdf
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-24 22:12:40+00:00): hey, feel free to change it back if you want to stick with Waka Kotahi's classification. my rationale for trunk was because traffic volumes majorly increased when the expressway opened, since it's become the fastest route between Auckland-wellington
MaestroGlanz (2023-08-09 10:26:09+00:00): You changed way 962957146 to the outdated version.
MindaugasS (2022-07-27 19:10:37+00:00): OK. Beje, ne aš buvau sugalvojęs tą užrašą, o tik pataisiau jame kabutes. Dabar matau, kad yra dar du taip pat pavadinti vaikų darželiai "Kaip miške" (su tokiomis kabutėmis), Turniškių sodų 39 ir Žirmūnų 139A. Ar nereikėtų atitinkamai pataisyti ir jų?
Tomas Straupis (2022-07-27 20:07:08+00:00): Taip, reikėtų ištaisyti visus.
moonraver (2022-07-28 06:37:08+00:00): Zdravim, neni tato cyklotrasa este vo vystavbe? Je uz oficialne otvorena? isiel som okolo pred 3 tyzdnami a este len bol asfalt potiahnuty cerstvo
Samuel Ondrisak (2022-07-28 07:47:09+00:00): Zdravim, uz je oficialne otvorena :)
hanchao (2022-07-26 12:00:50+00:00): 为什么把原来的线路关系删除，然后重新建一个，但又没添加到主关系中。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4508011/history

编辑地铁的时间，记得看下检查工具
https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/china.html
OilStation (2022-07-26 14:18:45+00:00): 实在是抱歉，不常碰关系，也是边看wiki边画。只是想着加几个地铁入口，一时糊涂。不记得是如何操作的，打乱了关系，但绝不是有意为之。

另外感谢您提供的网站，我会继续学习的。
OilStation (2022-07-26 14:43:50+00:00): 还有请问，应该怎样修复才比较妥当？要还原之前的关系吗？
ChrisFromRV (2022-07-28 08:16:09+00:00): Die Strecke soll erst 2027 fertig sein und nicht schon jetzt (Mitte 2022).
eggie (2022-07-24 07:29:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  bicycle=designated zal k nog even verwijderen. Dat hoort niet op een fietspad. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Unclevernon (2022-07-24 08:43:40+00:00): OK, bedankt, ook voor je tips.
jdiddid (2022-07-25 02:41:33+00:00): Hi, Nice to see someone else mapping in the area! I was wondering where you got your added information from. I couldn't find any indication that the actual park is named "Kesling Park Walking Trail", and the signage seems to indicate it all just being part of the singular Kesling Park. That’s why previously I moved the park name to the trail instead of splitting it into separate parks. Also, from all the info I could find, the tennis courts and baseball diamonds (not the softball diamonds though) seem to be fully fenced off and owned by the school system, not Kesling Park / City. That’s why I marked it earlier to be part of the school grounds. Let me know what you think, or if you have any additional notes to share! Thank you!
eggie (2022-07-24 07:36:23+00:00): Dag Unclevernon

OSM tagging is net rijstebrij in het begin.
Editor iD suggereert dat je van alles moet invullen, maar dit voegt niets toe. Dit is allemaal al default.
incline is hier nvt. in de polder.
foot=yes is default
oneway=ni tag je alleen als je bang bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen.
Bv op een tweerichtingrotonde voor fietsers. Je aanvullingen kunnen beter weg.
Gr eggie
Unclevernon (2022-07-24 08:42:29+00:00): Hi Eggie, dank voor je adviezen. Kan jij de toevoegingen weghalen of moet ik dat zelf doen? 
Het betreft hier een zeer recent aangelegd fietspad. Eerder was het denk ik slechts een wandelpad (gras/aarde).
eggie (2022-07-24 08:52:54+00:00): Je kunt het zelf aanpassen ter leering ende vermaeck. incline is bv voor bergpaden en trappen..
foot=yes laat ik meestal staan, maar is eigenlijk gewoon default in Nederland. 
Mapse
eggie
ChrissW-R1 (2022-07-25 10:02:30+00:00): Please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123449844
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124044030
arte2002 (2022-07-30 18:39:07+00:00): Hola adrianbenedited

Revierto algunos datos desactualizados del catastro

Parece que estás importando datos del catastro, tendrías que seguir las pautas de importación.

Consulta la guía de importación.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios/Gesti%C3%B3n_de_proyectos
Colin Smale (2022-07-24 22:12:57+00:00): Please don't change the admin_centre to a random node. It should be the place node of the admin centre settlement, not a label location or any geometrically derived location!
user_12630788 (2022-07-25 17:44:38+00:00): I'm not actually sure what you're on about. Can you tell me the node that offended? Also what is a label location that you mention? Finally what was geometrically derived? I did none of that so what is it that you say was?Confused.com
Colin Smale (2022-07-25 18:36:06+00:00): Hi,
In the relation for Milburn civil parish (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8353084) you changed the admin_centre from the place node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/242927783) to a different node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9907075403) which has no attributes at all! I have no idea why you did this. It has been changed back in the mean time by another user.
Milburn village is far from the centroid of the parish, and in similar cases it happens that people move the admin_centre to somewhere nearer the centroid in the mistaken expectation that it will look better on the screen, but that's not the way it works.
user_12630788 (2022-07-25 19:19:33+00:00): Right, ok.
AndersAndersson (2022-07-25 15:06:20+00:00): Hello
Changing from shop=clothes to outdoor is good. Thereyou fix a problem.
Changing survyed names is not good. Please restore them unless they are obviously wrong.
We have been discussing this is the Swedish community and no one is in favour of changing the names like this.
archie (2022-07-25 15:54:49+00:00): Sorry to disagree @AndersAndersson. This - and the other ones - was a god edit. On signs and in advertisments it is only Naturkompaniet or Systembolaget. The branch-name is never menntioned. 
There is really no point in refering to what was on your receipt (you have been a strong believer in what is on your receipts in the past time). In christmas times there are  sometimes wiches e g "God Jul" - Merry Christmas, eng) on the receipt. Does this make the name of the shop "Systembolaget God Jul" under christmas time?
What you @Seeking the Edge should have done is putting the suffix in the branch-tag. This would have made your edits nearly perfect! 
To sum it up: advertisment and signs is what is important in case of these big chains of shops. 
What's on the receipt is - in these cases - country-wide stores - a matter for the accountants and should not have any bearing on names here on osm. 
Mind you this is only for those country-wide chain-stores, otherwise I agree with you @AnderAndersson.
By the way. Systembolaget and 
 Naturkompaniet are leagally ONE entiy. The shops in diffrent citys and towns are pure branch-offices. This applies as well to other consumer-sided-companies here in Sweden.
emj (2022-08-17 19:05:34+00:00): This changeset was discussed here as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123949546
eggie (2022-07-24 07:57:08+00:00): Dag Unclevernon,
Welk bord staat er. Het is nu ingetekend als een officieel wandelpad met highway=footway. Dat heeft meestal een G7 bord
Wellicht is highway=path beter.
Waarom wel fietsen en niet wandelen?
De tagging is inconsistent.
Welk bord staat er vooraan. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123999033

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-24 08:02:31+00:00): Algemeen access=private zou voldoende moeten zijn, maar waarschijnlijk is het meer bedoeld om te voorkomen dat er geparkeerd gaat worden. Lastige tagging.. zeker voor bezorgdiensten.
Welling is motor_vehicle=destination een meer pragmatische tagging en kunnen de access=private tags beter weg.

Up to you..
eggie
eggie (2022-07-24 08:03:47+00:00): De parkeerplaats staat ook niet op private en triggert gebruikers die een parkeerterrein zoeken.
Dus toevoegen access=private  Dan wordt die P ook minder zichtbaar.
eggie (2022-07-24 08:42:30+00:00): access=private toegevoegd aan parkeerplaats
Unclevernon (2022-07-24 08:46:12+00:00): Dit stukje straat heeft dezelfde status als de aangelegen Leni Sarishof. De eigenaar is de VvE van de Minstreelstraat 28-40
Unclevernon (2022-07-24 08:56:14+00:00): Er staat geen bord hier gezien vanaf de Minstreelstraat, het is echter duidelijk een inrit en geen openbare weg.
Vanaf de Leni Sarishof staat ook geen bord omdat LSH al private is.
eggie (2022-07-24 08:58:06+00:00): Er is heel wat voor nodig om een straat aan de openbaarheid te onttrekken, maar wellicht is dat hier het geval. Een officieel besluit bv.
Dan worden bordjes geplaatst art. 461 wvs 
Soms zet zo'n VVE zelf borden neer tegen de zin van de Gemeente.
Dan is de tagging access=permissive ipv private.
Net als bij bv een Eigen Weg. Dat is niet verboden toegang.
eggie (2022-07-24 09:00:19+00:00): Maar wel die bicycle nog aanpassen. Dat klopt dan niet.
opendcc (2022-07-24 08:43:43+00:00): Diese Quad-Spur durch den Wald ist nicht mehr da?
jcr83 (2022-08-05 20:28:10+00:00): Bonjour,
La barrière https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9907089234 me semble mal  placée, on ne peut pas continuer sur le sentier autorisé ! De plus, il faudrait préciser le type de barrière (barrier=yes ne suffit pas).
user_2066394 (2022-07-24 09:26:40+00:00): Zum Anlanden wäre https://www.forst-kasten.de/ auch nicht verkehrt.
Jakka (2022-07-25 06:10:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station
Jakka (2022-07-25 06:11:02+00:00): Name is not a description of some thing
Jakka (2022-07-25 06:14:31+00:00): Is there a separate refill of dinking water. This will need a new point node. We can add only one amenity on same node ;)
Frans S (2022-08-23 09:32:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Your mappings are very sloppy.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124000405