piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-04-29 13:57:32+00:00): Is de naam hier werkelijk 'Natuurzwemmen Water aan de Warande' ? Of is het een omschrijving..
Kijk even hier hoe je een zwemgelegenheid in de natuur tagt.
Tag:leisure=swimming_area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_area

Groet,
eggie
Bienson (2022-04-30 04:33:31+00:00): Bitte keine korrekt eingetragenen Bürgersteige löschen. Danke.
omicron (2022-04-30 15:19:21+00:00): Sorry, wenn meine Änderung falsch war. Ich hatte mich an https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig orientiert. Demnach schien es mir hier sinnvoller zu sein, den Bürgersteig zusammen mit der Straße zu mappen. Zumal dies die einzige Straße in der Umgebung war mit separat gemapptem Bürgersteig.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-30 21:45:31+00:00): Your changesets have been reverted due to a number of issues.

 Roads should only be represented by one way unless there is physical separation of lanes. 

You should provide a source when updating boundaries and names of important features.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-30 21:50:22+00:00): Name field are not for describing features.
BCNorwich (2022-04-30 07:16:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've inadvertently duplicated a highway placing Way: 1055972838 on top of an existing highway. I've reverted the changeset so as to not alter the history of the existing mapping.

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
CaptainCarto (2022-04-29 12:46:27+00:00): Alors j’ai une question en particulier :
Il y a une espèce de grande zone piétonne, avec des jeux, des bancs, et plein de chemins par lesquels passer. Du coup j’ai représenté cette zone par une « area » à laquelle j’ai donné plusieurs attributs : espace de jeux pour enfants, chemin pédestre, surface en terre. Est-ce que c’est bon comme méthode ?
Snusmumriken (2022-04-29 13:23:14+00:00): Hej

Jag tänkte kommentera en aspekt av dina förändringar. Du hade lagt till bus=yes och public_transport=platform på en del busshållplatser. Inom SL:s område så använder vi oss av en förenklad modell för public transport
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sweden/Public_transport#F.C3.B6renklad_PT-taggning_f.C3.B6r_bussar

som inte innehåller dessa taggar. Jag vet att redigeraren du använde, iD kommer med dessa förändringsförslag, men vänligen ignorera dessa förslag när det kommer till public transport inom SL:s område.
gurglypipe (2022-04-29 17:10:10+00:00): Hiya, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Note that when editing buildings, it helps a lot to press the ‘Q’ key to auto-square their corners. This makes it a lot easier to draw (or resize) regular building shapes.

Thanks :)
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-04-29 14:51:36+00:00): Hi EdOri,
you added a node to a street with name="No through road".

What does this mean?
EdOri (2022-04-29 15:04:01+00:00): It means its a dead end road. There are concrete blocks blocking the road to prevent traffic going through the yard outside the block of flats.
69T31 (2022-04-29 16:08:02+00:00): Entschuldigung, dann ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-04-30 13:29:54+00:00): Hi EdOri!

Please use the name-Tag for real names only! For a road block use the barrier-Tag instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier

For solid blocks made of concrete use barrier=block. Select the node and just type "block" into the search box.

Only then a router can interpret this correctly.

Happy Mapping!
user_2066394 (2022-04-29 20:50:38+00:00): Im Haus Baustelle oder wird das Haus abgerissen?
KaosKatte (2022-04-29 22:42:21+00:00): Gebäude wird bis 2024 kernsaniert. Wohl kein Abriss. 
https://www.immobilienscout24.de/expose/133292208#/
user_2066394 (2022-04-29 23:37:46+00:00): Einwandfrei
GinaroZ (2022-05-02 20:54:03+00:00): This note can be resolved? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2428873
robochaa (2022-05-03 15:10:53+00:00): Yes, and I think I've resolved it. :)
SekeRob (2022-04-30 15:25:08+00:00): Hi,

The way crossing the 'multi-storey' parking is flagged. Aerial suggests your entrances are at different levels but all are tagged level=0 so I can't determine if the north-south way at right is crossing the roof (level=nn) or needs being tagged as a tunnel=building_passage with the appropriate level at which it's crossing.

ciao

PS, whatever happened to the AED. Is it now in the right place and can the fixme be removed?
pippo6 (2022-07-12 09:20:58+00:00): Hello. By now I don't have my notes on what is where (I will give a look when I come to the supermarket again), but meanwhile I summarized questions for in-person verification / surveying at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3263632
pippo6 (2022-07-12 09:21:57+00:00): Thank you very much for the AED
4004 (2022-05-01 00:26:00+00:00): мы с вами уже это обсуждали, пожалуйста, не удаляйте данные, если у вас нет данных лучше https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116908002 ну и я сомневаюсь, что вывеску они поменяли на транслитерацию https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=914795862427185&focus=photo
4004 (2022-05-01 00:27:13+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120403132
AdrianTamplaru (2022-05-09 06:09:55+00:00): Where did you get the source? There are two more roundabouts on Grigore Ionescu street which I wanted to map, but haven’t got any aerial sources.
ted3sco (2022-05-09 09:08:27+00:00): Salut, l-am trasat fiindca aparusera imagini in presa. Fiind foarte recent nu exista imagini din aer. 
L-am trasat in mare conform PUZ. apare o poza aici https://www.turnulsfatului.ro/2020/10/22/kaufland-pregateste-al-patrulea-magazin-in-sibiu-vizavi-de-cartierul-arhitectilor-cu-un-nou-acces-spre-oras-177353
ted3sco (2022-05-09 09:42:21+00:00): Pentru celelalte doua giratorii poate te ajuta pozele din link sau le trasez eu diseara https://www.turnulsfatului.ro/2020/07/05/viitorul-drum-din-arhitectilor-niciun-viraj-la-stanga-un-pod-doua-giratorii-trei-treceri-de-pietoni-patru-statii-de-autobuz-174720
AdrianTamplaru (2022-05-13 05:50:51+00:00): Am văzut că ai marcat deja un giratoriu. Bănuiesc că folosești JOSM – încă nu cunosc editorul atât de bine încât să trasez după imagini.
Mulțumesc pentru ajutor!
ted3sco (2022-05-13 12:11:19+00:00): Da, planurile din poze le aliniez in G Earth, trasez linii pe care le salvez in fisier kml/kmz si apoi import in JOSM si trasez dupa acele linii.

Am vazut ca ai adaugat restrictii de viraj la giratoriu. Sunt redundante daca avem sens unic pus pe segment. Imposibil sa te ruteze invers pe un sens unic. 
Pun acum si alt doilea giratoriu.
AdrianTamplaru (2022-05-13 18:47:57+00:00): Am pus restricțiile ca să nu ruteze întoarcere în U, ci prin giratoriu. Am pățit în unele situații să îmi zică să întorc înainte de a intra în sens.
eggie (2022-04-29 15:15:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De regel construction=apartments nog verwijderen.
Geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek zetten. Er zijn al adresnodes.
De name=... kan natuurlijk wel.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-29 15:37:16+00:00): De adresgegevens heb ik verwijderd net als de regel construction=apartments

Gr eggie
alpinekid (2022-04-29 15:35:22+00:00): not sure how I did this I only indented to add the bike rack. dont know why the resturant got in there. How do I fix this?
Johan Stuart (2026-03-20 11:24:56+00:00): Natuurgebied bestaande uit ondiep water, slik, riet en grasland. Er komen veel vogels voor zoals Grutto's, Watersnippen, Kluten, Wintertalingen en Bergeenden.
haukep (2022-04-29 18:13:00+00:00): Hallo! Danke für die Änderung. In diesem Changeset hast du Way 238354339 gelöscht. Folge davon ist, dass Fahrradnavigationstools nun einige Probleme im Norden der Jüdefelderstraße haben: Wenn man aus der Jüdefelderstraße nach Norden auf die Münzstraße nach Westen kommen möchte, wurden die Routen vor der Änderung so berechnet, dass man die Münzstraße über Way 238354339 überquerte. Wo es diesen Way nun nicht mehr gibt, führt dies zu einer sehr komplizierten Routenberechnung, bei der Radfahrer aus der Jüdefelderstraße kommend erst auf dem Radweg nach Osten, dann über die Ampel bei der Hollenbeckerstraße, und dann erst auf den Radweg nach Westen geschickt werden.

Ich würde daher vorschlagen, Way 238354339 wiederherzustellen. Was denkst du?
Claudius Henrichs (2022-04-29 14:43:24+00:00): Source was Maxar imagery
azakh-world (2022-04-30 09:31:14+00:00): Hi!
Please do not remote stop_area relations at subway stations. They are used by routing engines to build routes on subway networks. I mean relations https://www.osm.org/relation/6597385 and https://www.osm.org/relation/2464084
which I've recovered.

Best regards,
Alexey
bings81 (2022-06-12 09:03:09+00:00): Sind auf dem Wallrafweg denn Pferde erlaubt? Dann würde ich das noch ergänzen. Danke für euer Feedback @TouristInfoOberstdorf
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-25 19:48:33+00:00): please, dont duplicate names
eggie (2022-04-29 15:34:23+00:00): Svp niet dubbel toevoegen. Het Crematorum met naam staat al op het gebouw.
Deze vermelding kan dus weg.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-29 15:35:19+00:00): Dubbele tagging verwijderd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
legofahrrad (2022-05-17 18:10:46+00:00): Moin! Was soll denn der Name "Gewerbeabfall" hier?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
impiaaa (2022-04-30 16:55:11+00:00): In changeset 120350812, you dragged the restaurant node away from its original location, but this changeset deletes it entirely. I restored the node to its original location with changeset 120392764. In the future it might help to go to the node and view its history, to see what changed. osmcha.org can also help visualizing changes.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-29 21:47:35+00:00): I've reverted all related changes so everything is back to exact original state. If you come across such an issue in the future try get someone to revert as that is much easier.
Thanks
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120365947
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-29 21:49:20+00:00): For example ask someone on the Discord if you need help. https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mtmail (2022-05-31 17:45:34+00:00): The wikipedia page of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/151668218 says the place is locationed at/on the Rio Grande. I believe it describes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/151789456 instead
Kovirii (2022-06-09 04:02:06+00:00): You are correct, thanks for pointing this out.
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-04-30 11:17:05+00:00): Description = removed tags "name".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
TECHDEV GPS (2022-04-29 16:00:18+00:00): el unico paso posible es por pasaje 4 poniente, el cual no posee calle es solo camino de tierra por encima de bandejón central
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-29 22:01:08+00:00): I've fixed the errors, but to disconnect features: 
HOLDING shift, select the feature (in this case the building) and the node where it connects.
 Then right click on the node and click disconnect. 
https://imgur.com/a/5PrMWUM
user_6110846 (2022-04-30 05:15:59+00:00): у с Завидово у рішенні вул Горького перейменовано на Хмельницького 
уважніше перейменовуй
user_6110846 (2022-04-30 05:17:36+00:00): шутка
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
JJIglesias (2022-04-29 20:02:45+00:00): Hi Klaus, it may be useful if you use the tag source:name=XXXX for the features that you complete.
Otherwise thanks for your editions.
BsRgds
JJ
user_5359 (2022-05-01 15:11:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1056029744. What is the meaning of the tag Sentiero tra campi = Sentiero?
AntiCompositeNumber (2023-08-26 16:57:06+00:00): Are you sure these roads are `access=private`? It seems odd for a road to a supermarket. Note that roads that are privately owned aren't necessarily `access=private`. Only roads with signs like "residents only" or "no trespassing" should be tagged `access=private`. Roads that are simply marked with "PVT" or "Private" on the street sign should be tagged `ownership=private` and not `access=private`.
carolinek22 (2023-09-29 18:27:43+00:00): I am coming at this from a pedestrian/biking perspective. When I see the "private" yellow placard placed with a green street sign, that signals to me that I shouldn't be there. I guess I grew up in a place where "private" means someone is going to call the cops, or worse, when they see you. Perhaps 'access=permissive' would be better? I use the Dover GIS maps to inform my tagging, ie: https://dovernh.mapgeo.io/datasets/properties?abuttersDistance=200&latlng=43.208985%2C-70.918818&previewId=E0035-H00000&zoom=15
AntiCompositeNumber (2023-09-29 19:02:30+00:00): From an OSM perspective, the only thing that the yellow sign implies is that the city has not accepted maintenance of the road, which is why the city lists them as private in their maps. access=permissive would fit most private roads that don't have signage implying access=private.
Taurantas (2022-04-29 16:30:19+00:00): Thought this edited the map only for me, dont know how to cancel
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-29 19:32:24+00:00): Atšaukiau :-) Sėkmės
datendelphin (2022-05-06 15:28:21+00:00): Ich bin verärgert. Die einzige substantielle Änderung ist falsch: Das Luftbild im Birch ist veraltet. Die Strasse geht nun nördlich der Häuser durch. Sofamapper!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
virbeta (2022-05-31 03:45:34+00:00): I'd like to suggest avoiding marking roads like this (the edit on Park Avenue) as under construction in circumstances like this. As described in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction), edits like this can stick around for many months on offline data sets. The wiki suggests only marking a road as being under construction if the project is expected to take longer than 6-9 months.
ovruni (2022-04-30 06:32:04+00:00): Hola, cuando hay mas de una indicación en el mismo carril estos van separados por ";" (punto y coma). Puede encontrar información sobre esto en la wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:turn
Saludos
mariotomo (2022-04-29 18:38:31+00:00): :+1: :-)
mueschel (2022-05-15 09:48:54+00:00): Could you check this way? It got a strange 'onewayparking' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056055549
FrançoiseR (2022-05-15 14:29:46+00:00): It's a one-way street, there's a right turn prohibition except for local residents. I actually tried "oneway:parking" (the lack of ":" is a typo), it's probably stupid. Please suggest a better solution. 
See picture here : : https://wtf.roflcopter.fr/pics/gallery#1ZTuhK9o/e8fIr99h.jpg
mueschel (2022-05-15 14:45:05+00:00): Thanks for the explanation!
This could be
oneway:conditional = no @ destination
(according to "sans liverains")
FrançoiseR (2022-05-16 12:38:19+00:00): Thank you very much. I didn't know that. It opens up a lot of possibilities for me.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-29 19:06:31+00:00): What is your source for using Wado City?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
edvac (2022-05-11 10:55:32+00:00): It seems Wado City is just a proposal, based on issues among communities during colonial times. It's not an official name as far as we know.

This issue is being handled in DWG Ticket#2022050110000027

Please: don't change or add again Wado city node(s) before consulting with other users of your community.

Rafael Avila Coya
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
EnumMapper (2022-05-06 22:23:08+00:00): 您好，请问为何移除部分含有名称的风电场？例如https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772853531/history

以下电厂均被移除：
779892950, v2
772854003, v3
772853531, v3
772852917, v3
772852714, v4
772850965, v3
772850273, v3
772847920, v4
Lepuse (2022-05-07 02:24:02+00:00): 使用大片区域表示在其中只有零星散布风电机的风电场并不妥当，我已改为使用type=site关联将其与相应风电机组合，可于https://openinframap.org/可视化查看。
EnumMapper (2022-05-07 09:54:42+00:00): 了解。我查看了新建的关系，的确没有问题： https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14090664
似乎此种关系无法以名字搜索，不过这跟此修改集无关了。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SekeRob (2022-04-29 18:01:32+00:00): Short visit, 12 issues solved \o/
hanchao (2022-04-30 09:27:59+00:00): 不要破坏数据
hanchao (2022-04-30 09:44:02+00:00): 数据已恢复
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120377566
Felipe Alves (2022-04-29 22:24:58+00:00): Oi, RFilho. Td bem?

Vi que começou a editar recentemente, seja bem vindo! Nesta edição, percebi que adicionou a escola tanto como ponto, mas também como área. Se adicionar como área, não precisa inserir também o ponto (eu corrigi neste caso).

Ah, e quando está marcando a área total da escola, não é correto usar a etiqueta de construção, esta etiqueta pode ser usada para cada uma das edificações da escola, se quiser detalhar.

Qq dúvida, só avisar.

Abs
L'imaginaire (2022-04-30 14:41:36+00:00): Lijkt me daar een leuke plek!
Ik heb de tags op deze wegen nog wat opgekuist, zodat ze nu als "klaar" worden aanzien.
Vinber-Pro (2023-12-20 11:03:06+00:00): salut,
en retombant ici je me demande si access=customers est adapté ? nous l'avons ajouté lors de la carto, est-ce customers, private, permissive ... doute, je ne sais pas :)
Patchanka (2023-12-26 13:24:08+00:00): tu te poses trop de questions @Vinber-Pro !! :-D 
access=customers ne me choque pas, mais cela pourrait aussi être considéré private... ça ne me choquerait pas non plus...
Si tu veux le modifier tu peux.

Bonnes fêtes à toi
Vinber-Pro (2024-01-04 09:29:37+00:00): trop de questions, trop de questions :) bonnes années ! et sinon je ne sais pas encore mais customers effectivement pour des batiments d'écoles ou accueillant des entreprises, cela ne me semble pas tout à fait adaptés
emersonveenstra (2022-04-29 20:13:53+00:00): This is not a correct use of `ref`. These are already tagged as `old_ref=US 131`, which is correct. Please revert this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120360344
marczoutendijk (2022-05-01 12:20:39+00:00): Note: 
mapillary=* is supposed to be a link to an image, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mapillary
Why are you using UPPERCASE for the name WARRI? All other places are in mixed case. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters
Can you fix those issues?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Jon Snow 47 (2022-05-01 12:25:44+00:00): Yes I will fix it now sir please the name of the city is Warri it is in delta state Nigeria but it is still showing a fake name of Wado city that doesn’t exist
Jon Snow 47 (2022-05-01 13:07:15+00:00): The uppercase has been edited and fixed please make Warri be visible on the map and delete anything that is Wado city the city name is Warri and not Wado city 

You can confirm it here on list of government towns and cities you will find Warri there and not Wado city it is just a movement by another ethnic group in the state to change the name of Warri which is causing ethnic violence the original name is Warri known by the federal government and state government Wado city doesn’t exist 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-cities-and-towns-in-Nigeria-2042462

Thank you
marczoutendijk (2022-05-01 17:59:02+00:00): I don't see any reference to Wado City. Please note that your browser might show cached data. Please do a browser refresh to see the current version.
I still do see a lot of UPPERCASE names like WARRI ISLAND and WARRI DELTA STATE!
marczoutendijk (2022-05-01 18:00:37+00:00): Maybe those UPPERCASE names only show up at certain zoom levels.
Jon Snow 47 (2022-05-01 18:02:56+00:00): Okay I will Edit the Warri island now the Wado city shows when you zoom out but when you zoom more in it changes please I want it to be Warri
Jon Snow 47 (2022-05-01 18:17:42+00:00): I have fixed the upper case name and everyone in Facebook and when they come up here it shows Wado city please help me fix it back to Warri that’s the original name
marczoutendijk (2022-05-01 19:10:23+00:00): Once you have changed it, it will take some time (sometimes more than a week) before it shows up on the map in all zoom levels.
Be patient!!
Jon Snow 47 (2022-05-01 19:11:35+00:00): Okay thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.