piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:50:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
marczoutendijk (2016-08-12 19:13:27+00:00): Ik heb de apotheek gecorrigeerd omdat de gegevens uit de adresnode gedupliceerd waren ipv. de gegevens van de Apotheek op de adresnode te plaatsen.
Opmerking:
Maps.me is niet de beste editor voor het aanpassen van dit soort details. 
Kijk ook eens naar JOSM zoals je in de wiki kunt zien.
Opmerking:
Maps.me is niet de beste editor voor het aanpassen van dit soort details. 
Kijk ook eens naar JOSM zoals je in de wiki kunt zien.
RicoElectrico (2019-08-28 06:20:05+00:00): Hi, are you sure the street name change was intentional?

Your edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33042599

Existing street, with note regarding name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33042601
Vu Nguyen AROWANA MMO (2016-08-01 07:18:18+00:00): dịch vụ rất tốt
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Supaplex (2016-08-01 09:06:50+00:00): The welcome is a duplicated item
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2311690630
fh0 (2016-08-01 10:00:53+00:00): Can you please also post the link to the dupliated POI?
I don't see another POI for the supermarket.
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
mueschel (2016-08-04 10:47:07+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way (and adjacent)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435100282
This doesn't seem right.
Cheers, Jan
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-24 06:11:44+00:00): Hi, Super-Map. I changed the classification of the roads (way 435102972, way 435102931, way 435103337, way 435103360, way 435103449,  way 435103276) to be unclassified highways.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-25 23:59:21+00:00): Hi, Super-Map. I changed the classification of the roads (way 435103101) to be track highways and this roads (way 435103091, way 435103414) to be unclassified highway. I also adjusted it based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Please tell me if I'm wrong.
BCNorwich (2016-08-01 09:56:57+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is usual in English to write postcode, street and name with the initial letters as capitols so rather than :-
addr:postcode=nw1 0aa
addr:street=bayham street
name=smart camden inn hostel
You would have :-
addr:postcode=NW1 0AA
addr:street=Bayham Street
name=Smart Camden Inn Hostel
Also please note you have positioned the POI on Charlton Street. Also that there is already a hostel named "Camden Inn" on Bayham Street. Would you please rectify the anomaly.
BCNorwich (2016-08-26 06:38:50+00:00): Fiction deleted.
richlv (2016-08-01 10:56:26+00:00): hi there - this looks a bit strange. is there really a shelter with wlan access there ?
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 10:27:31+00:00): Hoi SchuurPapier,

Zie onderstaande niet als verwijt, maar als leermoment.
Ik zag dat je de schoolgebieden als gebouw hebt aangemaakt, dit is niet gebruikelijk er is namelijk nu een gebouw in gebouw ontstaan.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4an3q1jx8q91y9t/2016-12-14_11-23-24.png?raw=1
Inmiddels heb ik de situatie aangepast. Hier kun je meer lezen over dit onderwerp.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 10:49:25+00:00): Ik heb de dubbele gebouwen inmiddels verwijdert.
Volgens mij zitten hier diverse scholen gehuisvest, ben jij in de gelegenheid om te controleren of er nog meer scholen in dit gebied zijn ondergebracht?
SchuurPapier (2016-12-14 12:07:06+00:00): Ik zal vanavond even kijken, ik weer uit ervaring dat er inderdaad meerdere scholen/bedrijven zijn gehuisvest.
wambacher (2016-08-01 14:56:30+00:00): Hi MonsterStreamer: Mach bitte vernünftige Kommentare. "änderungen" ist nicht ausreichend. Deine Prosa von vor einigen Tagen war aber zu viel.
wambacher (2016-08-01 15:08:39+00:00): ansonsten ist dein Brücke Schrott. Schau dir doch mal die Änderungen an. Zudem ist der Name fraglich (Peach bedeutet Pfirsich!) und da du die Quelle nicht genannt hast, hab ich den Namen eben entfernt.
wambacher (2016-08-01 15:10:56+00:00): siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41169963
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
maraf24 (2016-08-01 17:03:17+00:00): A o co chodzi? Nie widzę żadnej zmiany.
indigomc (2017-09-25 16:58:00+00:00): Reverted
Commodoortje (2016-08-04 19:47:56+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. Op dit adres is geen bank gevestigd. Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
eggie (2020-12-02 15:49:31+00:00): Al een ouder account.. maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
catdreamer (2017-06-10 08:07:42+00:00): 這路名是否有錯?66號?
catdreamer (2017-06-10 08:06:29+00:00): 這路名否有錯?42號?
maraf24 (2016-08-01 16:49:46+00:00): To są jakieś bzdury.
Usunąłem.
trial (2016-08-01 17:36:34+00:00): Je suppose que vous avez voulu dire que la piste fait 3 m de large, pas -3 m.
trial (2017-12-21 15:45:57+00:00): a  été corrigé
trigpoint (2016-08-01 17:16:08+00:00): Hi Brian
Please could you split your changesets into smaller areas. Large areas such as this make it difficult for the community to see what has changed in their areas of interest.
Thanks Phil
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 09:09:26+00:00): Hoi Schuurpapier,
Ik zag dat je goedwillend bent geweest om 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6338575
te voorzien van boundary=administrative
Ik heb deze aangepast naar landuse=residential 
De boundary's worden namelijk vanuit de BAG geïmporteerd en is al aanwezig.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2696270
SchuurPapier (2016-12-14 09:18:31+00:00): Hallo Commodoortje, 

Excuus :), bedankt voor het aanpassen, ik zou er op letten de volgende keer ^^
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 09:40:02+00:00): Bij nader inzicht heb ik de residential helemaal verwijdert, 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pszezv49c40pzny/2016-12-14_10-36-41.png?raw=1
Deze liep namelijk een groot gedeelte over Industrieterrein Haatland, en Kampen is inmiddels verdeeld over kleinere stukken residential.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mopbuxg3aj5gziz/2016-12-14_10-39-37.png?raw=1
Hjart (2016-08-02 09:14:37+00:00): Det officielle navn for dette træ er "Valdemarsegen"
MarvinMep (2016-08-05 19:23:41+00:00): Olá, Gabriel!
Não estou entendendo essas suas edições. Qual é a sua intenção com com esses pontos indicando nomes dos bairros?
Você tem feito vários para os mesmos bairros com tags que não parecem fazer muito sentido juntas nesses pontos.

Eu vou mapear agora os bairros de Barra Mansa agora (e modificar esses pontos), mas seria interessante entendermos a sua intenção para podermos nos ajudar.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-06 14:14:10+00:00): Oops, you managed to change the name of Portugal here.  See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/51281/why-portugal-name-is-travessa-santa-margarida-de-chavez .  It's been fixed now.
Shinigami (2016-08-06 17:25:15+00:00): Hugh, thank you very much, stupid mistake:(.
maraf24 (2016-08-01 16:29:55+00:00): Zmiany wycofałem.
naoliv (2016-08-04 01:27:22+00:00): Please, don't insert such objects in OSM.
It's not the proper place to have these places.
bigest (2016-08-03 05:09:10+00:00): Дорожка вдоль реки, которая упирается в полянку не может быть highway=tertiary. Все официальные дороги соединяют населенные пункты. Такая "дорога", которая из ниоткуда в никуда, просто накатанная по полю или лесу это highway=track. А линки это вообще развязки (съезды/выезды).
Крайне рекомендую к прочтению http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway !
user_5359 (2016-08-01 16:52:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218714567, the Hospital property. I think your entry is a duplicate entry, because work isn't a name of the hospital. It is a description between the hospital und you.

Please cleanup this information ( If you need help: You are welcome).
giva (2020-01-10 17:53:25+00:00): Salve, mi pare che in questa modifica il nome del nodo 209876704 sia stato cambiato in "Via Vallenzasca". Ora, non riesco a trovare riferimenti per questo nome (la BDTRE riporta "Via Leonardo Da Vinci", via Valenzasca a Borgomanero è da un altra parte). Si tratta di un errore, o c'è qualche documentazione/delibera riguardante questo? Grazie mille
procuste (2020-01-11 16:30:35+00:00): Buon pomeriggio. Sinceramente non ricordo se aggiunsi io quel nome o se modificai solo qualche cosa, ero passato per di là ed avevo fatto alcune modifiche, anche aiutandomi con una cartina per quanto riguarda la toponomastica. Se le risulta un toponimo diverso probabilmente si è trattato di un errore mio o della mappa che avevo preso. Buona serata.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-01 19:23:33+00:00): Neste conjunto de mudanças você alterou o nível de vias residenciais para primárias. Acho que não faz sentido. Melhor voltar ao estado de residencial.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-08 22:59:40+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what's happening here?  These ways seem to be unconnected to "normal" data, and part of relations that either have data that's unused elsewhere in OSM (type=lanelet) or garbage (lanes=1,6443454).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
maraf24 (2016-08-02 19:26:11+00:00): I have reverted you changes.
The name is "Wyszkowo", not "Hohenfürst (Wyszkowo)".
bmwdakar (2016-08-03 20:09:45+00:00): I wanted to add only the German name so that it appears on the German OSM and have it entered incorrectly. Now I have done it right. Thanks for the correction. In the village of my great-grandmother was born in 1839.
manuelab_telenav (2017-05-17 08:57:06+00:00): Hello,

I was correcting errors caused by turn restrictions in OSM and i stumbled upon one that you added. I'm talking about relation id 6451285. I think this is wrong, because there is even a turn lane that indicates you can turn right. In the comment you wrote that you used Mapillar as source, but i cannot find any signs in the images. Could you please review this restriction again? 
Thank you!
BharataHS (2017-05-18 09:28:16+00:00): Hello manuelab_telenav,

I checked out the Mapillary images around the region and as you noticed, it doesn't seem to have a no_right_turn restriction. Not sure how this mistake happened. Removing this erroneous turn restriction. Thanks for flagging this. Please let know if there are more cases similar to this.

Regards,
BharataHS (2017-05-18 09:28:55+00:00): Fixed the issue. Here is the corrected changeset. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48785273
manuelab_telenav (2017-05-19 06:15:48+00:00): Great! Thanks and keep on mapping :)
dvdhoven (2016-08-14 15:11:43+00:00): Hallo whturner,

Deze route is door jou niet goed gesorteerd.
Dat is ook te zien in het overzicht van VMarc, daar wordt gemeld "De wegen in deze route zijn volledig maar de volgorde is door elkaar gehaald."
Als je met forward/backward moet werken, doe je eerst de heenrichting, dan de terugrichting vanaf het eerste splitspunt, dus tegen de rijrichting in. Jij had de terugrichting met de rijrichting mee gesorteerd, maar dat moet dus niet.
In het relatievenster kun je het ook gauw zien, meestal is een van beide richtingen te lang.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
BCNorwich (2016-08-01 14:04:13+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a database rather than just a map. To go with OSM best practice I have made a few adjustments to the POI taxi service you added to the database :- 
adjust postcode, capitalize leading letters to road name, changed it to taxi (as per website), changed name (as per website) and adjust phone number. I deduced the property this operation is run from, mapped that house and placed the information on that building. Now the map can properly show the building and address the service is run from.
joost schouppe (2016-08-08 11:47:03+00:00): Hoi Rik,
Je kan die hekjes ook toevoegen aan de kaart. Zie bijvoorbeeld: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#Access_Control_on_Highways

Overigens: komende woensdag komen er enkele mensen op café samen in Halle om het over OpenStreetMap te hebben. Altijd welkom! Zie http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/232887407/
Endres Pelka (2016-08-02 13:36:17+00:00): Hello! When splitting the way 49074197 in two parts, you accidentally excluded the "new" part (435144800) from the boundary relation of Québec. I'm fixing it now. Please be more careful next time.
zimba (2016-08-10 09:40:59+00:00): Reverted, because the name-tag should not be used for localized names.
geri-oc (2019-05-23 06:59:34+00:00): Ist mit der Änderung des Parplatzes der note erledigt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1582468#map=18/48.55269/8.17401&layers=N
Gruß Gerd
Geofreund1 (2019-05-23 09:23:55+00:00): habe die Notiz geschlossen
Gruß
Geofreund1
species (2016-08-06 09:18:54+00:00): Please don't put alien characters in name (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names) - "name=" is for the name local people use. Use name:$LANG for adding foreign names.
zimba (2016-08-10 09:41:06+00:00): Reverted, because the name-tag should not be used for localized names.
Alecs01 (2016-08-05 16:46:03+00:00): Hi, there's arguably not a bus_stop in Venice, I deleted the entry
Supaplex (2016-08-10 10:54:03+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
EinKonstanzer (2016-08-01 19:42:32+00:00): Bitte schauen, dass die Beschreibung der Änderungen auch zu den Änderungen paßt. Das hier ist der Bereich Heinrich-Heine-Allee.
vmanulik (2016-08-01 20:00:22+00:00): Нащо ви виправили англомовні назви?
dudka (2016-08-01 20:23:19+00:00): Про яку вулицю запитання? Я здається тільки перейменував Інтернаціональний провулок, Монастирський узвіз і Дружби Народів. Також виправив багато в адресах будинків
vmanulik (2016-08-01 20:25:36+00:00): Наприклад, Монастирський узвіз.
Що ви виправляли в адресах? Всі номери домів я наносив тільки після особистого огляду будинків!
dudka (2016-08-01 20:32:13+00:00): Для узвозу я помістив українську назву як основну в name. Англомовну не змінював. Для багатьох будинків(наприклад по колишнім Леніна і Червоноармійській) було вказано стару назву вулиці, я замінив на нову назву.
vmanulik (2016-08-01 20:35:33+00:00): Добре, а то я трохи перелякався, бо для цієї роботи приїжджаю з Харкова до рідного міста (Генічеська).
Щодо вказаної назви, як я пам'ятаю, слід використовувати у будинку лише у тому разі, коли не зрозуміло до якох саме вулиці він відноситься (кутові). Тобто з не кутових її слід взагалі видалити.
dudka (2016-08-01 20:41:57+00:00): Назву вулиці потрібно вказувати для всіх будинків, не тільки для кутових. Людина, або деякі програми можуть "здогадуватися" до якої вулиці відноситься будинок, але це досить ресурсозатратна задача, тому потрібно вказувати назву вулиці для всіх будинків
vmanulik (2016-08-01 20:43:45+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10170

Розділ "Нумерация домов"
dudka (2016-08-01 20:49:36+00:00): Там написано що будинки треба привязувати до вулиць використовуючи associatedStreet зв'язки. В цьому випадку можна не вказувати addr:street. Але в протилежному випадку звісно треба.
vmanulik (2016-08-01 20:51:50+00:00): Хм, я сприйняв як інший розділ..
KKS (2016-09-28 20:29:51+00:00): Доброго дня, чи не могли б ви злінкувати лінію http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435172570 з мережею доріг дорогою типу unclassified/residential ?
По супутнику не видно як до тієї дороги можна дістатись автомобілем.
Дякую.
user_5359 (2016-08-01 18:20:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Peda (2016-08-02 21:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41202194 where the changeset comment is: Revert some changesets of user FromBonnCologne as most of it were imaginary additions. (See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-01 19:36:54+00:00): Vejo que nesta mudança você retirou um acesso à rodoviária, você tem certeza que esse acesso foi retirado?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-01 19:42:54+00:00): Você também deletou uma via que passa por trás da rodoviária.Eu vou reverter esse changeset.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-01 19:44:00+00:00): Reversão concluída aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41176049
Qi MU (2016-08-01 16:58:24+00:00): Sorry, the changeset message is not correct. It should be "Add Temple of Enlightenment marker".
user_5359 (2016-08-01 18:23:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please read the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship, follow the link to the key religion and denomination.
Alecs01 (2016-08-02 19:00:13+00:00): Hi and welcome, could you please indicate the exact location of the hotel? it's arguably not on a sidewalk
jaap de vries (2016-09-08 09:26:30+00:00): altijd erbij zetten wat je hebt gedaan, wat heb je geupdate hier?
naoliv (2016-08-10 13:15:35+00:00): AjBelnuovo, você está reclassificando muitas rodovias de forma errada.
Por exemplo, muitas vias sem pavimentação, que deveriam ser no máximo terciárias, você está deixando todas como secundárias.
AjBelnuovo (2016-08-11 01:14:00+00:00): Já reverti para terciária .Está faltando na área de SBC .
user_5359 (2016-08-01 18:26:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please see the key office. And I think it will be a good idea to add the key website=http://www.wfrc.org, isn't it?
Thomas8122 (2016-08-02 15:52:41+00:00): Wann sind denn die Straßen "Am Staffelstein" / "Staffelsteinstraße" umbenannt worden? Das glaub ich einfach nicht. Gibt´s da eine Quelle wo man das nachlesen kann?
Thomas8122 (2016-08-02 15:54:52+00:00): Freundschaftsring, Kurze Straße, Moosleite,
Nach dem Rainchen, Stiller Winkel, Zur Steinrücke fehlen jetzt auch!
edtha (2016-08-03 10:00:09+00:00): Da hab ich irgentwelche Werte falsch eingefügt, hab das wieder korrigiert. Aber trotzdem danke für das schnelle Melden.
Hjart (2016-08-01 23:15:55+00:00): Hold venligst diverse landuse polygoner mm adskilt fra vejnettet. Som uerfaren kan det være svært at se problemet, men når man som jeg har arbejdet rigtig meget med justering og fejlretning på vejnettet, kan man hurtigt blive seriøst ked af hele tiden at skulle skille skidtet ad og jeg har også set adskillige tilfælde hvor landuse der har overlappet vejnettet på uheldig måde har snydt mindre erfarne bidragsydere.
FOXTTER (2016-08-01 23:27:30+00:00): Synes det var lidt svært at finde noget i wikien om hvorvidt de skulle hænge sammen eller ej, men hvis det ønskværdige er at de er separeret, så vil jeg lige gå dem igennem i morgen og skille dem ad.
Hjart (2016-08-01 23:47:22+00:00): Man finder ikke rigtig ud af den slags hvis ikke man er særdeles erfaren, så det er nok derfor der ikke rigtig står noget :-). Kunne godt være jeg skulle finde ud af at forfatte et eller andet.
chnav (2016-08-04 04:42:01+00:00): Не надо было удалять поликлинику. Нарисовал новый контур, выделил новый контур и старый, нажал Ctrl-G. Происходит слияние геометрий, сохраняется история объекта и старые точки перемещаются на новое место.
chnav (2016-08-04 10:01:27+00:00): Поправка, горячая комбинация Ctrl-Shift-G !!!
wojtas82 (2016-10-24 18:05:40+00:00): Popsuta Aleja Marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/54.50790/18.55195
arvdk (2017-12-02 17:18:14+00:00): MAPS.ME is not ideal for adding restaurants (or any other change). Please always check your change on Openstreetmap.org or with JOSM (even better). In this case, you had created a double address. I've fixed it for you.
luschi (2016-08-01 18:44:15+00:00): sry wrong link above.
here the correct:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55299
highflyer74 (2016-08-02 10:10:37+00:00): Moin Taxi und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall habe ich die addr:*=* Tags wieder entfernt, da diese nur für Gebäude bzw. Geschäfte genutzt werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dtaxi).

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74