piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alexey_zakharenkov (2017-06-16 07:33:10+00:00): Да, просто протоптанная и в дождь грязная тропинка, но важная для половины потока пешеходов, идущих к/от платформы. Как её правильно - path или footway?
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 07:52:53+00:00): Любым из. Но я бы предпочел highway=footway. highway=path это более общее понятие, и если известно, что это пешеходная дорожка, то предпочтительней использовать footway (For urban paths which a designated for pedestrians only, better use highway=footway.) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
AsgerFrank (2017-06-16 15:35:16+00:00): Dobbelte adresser, det må være fx når man har brugt præfix-tags med addr:xxx på et POI eller en bygning. 
Jeg troede egentlig det var en dyd at  tagge adressen på, ud fra en bisætning i Talk-dk ganske vist, og hvis jeg husker rigtigt. Jeg har sommetider gjort det selv, når jeg orkede,  Men det er så ikke hensigtsmæssigt, tvært imod? 
 Det lød ellers logisk, fordi der kun ellers er den rent geometriske placering på kortet til at angive/antyde en butiks husnummer.
Jørn-osm (2017-06-17 19:15:50+00:00): Ja, og også osak:*. Læs eventuelt mere her http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Adresser

Det optimale ville være at kun AWSbot retter adresse tags.

Når en placering er kendt er det muligt at finde den nærmeste adresse.
Mike Baggaley (2017-06-20 20:26:16+00:00): HI, is this road really named Gate 1 Access Road, or is this a description (in which case it should not go in the name field)? It seems more likely that the gate should be named Gate 1.

Regards,
Mike
zaizone (2018-02-23 12:41:10+00:00): Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300965576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921507120
Could you please fix it and maybe restore my reputation ! Thanx, have a good mapping.
zaizone (2018-02-23 12:39:39+00:00): Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300968250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921563456
Could you please fix it and maybe restore my reputation ! Thanx, have a good mapping.
imperialmog (2017-06-16 11:49:58+00:00): I was looking at some point adding this, thanks. Also if you know the extent of the subdivision you could plot that out as residential area.

Also, you can look at the county parcel info for more detail since there are a few additional streets mentioned.

http://maps.stlouisco.com/propertyview/
mueschel (2017-06-24 20:15:14+00:00): Hi,
Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
tbm (2017-06-24 20:18:52+00:00): Fixed, thanks!
nammala (2017-06-16 05:28:03+00:00): Hi Julian,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OSM. Noticed that you have added random park . Please make a note that OSM is the real map of the world and any data we add should be ground truth not fictional mapping. 

Best Regards,
nammala
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-31 21:19:15+00:00): Hi, du hast bei diesem Gebäude relation 7335322 den inneren Ring ausgestanzt. Bist du sicher, dass das so ist?
Mir scheint eher, dass der Hof, den man von oben sieht, der Dachgarten des unteren, durchgehenden Bauteils ist (mit den dunklen Fassaden), und der obere Bauteil mit den Fenstern ist, etwas verdreht, mit Innenhof dort aufgesetzt.
Polarbear (2018-02-13 11:53:22+00:00): Habe nach Recherchen ein 3D-Modell draus gemacht. 
Die URL der Webseite, die du mit übertragen hattest, musste ich entfernen, da sie bereits März 2017 als Pornoseite abgegriffen wurde.
Alecs01 (2017-06-16 08:15:22+00:00): Reverted; you created random POI at road junctions, please note your edits are public
tuxayo (2018-10-10 19:36:27+00:00): Salut, la ref n'est pas faite pour les ligne.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:public_transport

Pour mapper les lignes il faut se lancer là dedans: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bus#Ligne_de_bus
RicoElectrico (2017-06-16 11:26:12+00:00): W Szperku to samo. Miał się pojawić Intermarche, a póki co nic z tego nie wyszło. Będziesz śledzić zmiany? To nie mój rejon ;)
iwankgb (2017-06-16 11:37:26+00:00): Będę, to u mnie na dzielni.
mweper (2017-06-16 16:21:53+00:00): Hola solonob. Fijate que al eliminar la bifurcación de la calle Newell, se rompió la relación que marcaba el área del palomar.
mweper (2017-06-16 16:31:53+00:00): y parece que del Jardín Francés también. Voy a tratar de corregirlos.
fkv (2017-06-30 22:19:47+00:00): Was an diesem Changeset eine "error correction" sein soll, kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Du hast von 2 Kreisverkehren oneway=yes entfernt (das zwar schon durch junction=roundabout impliziert, aber nicht falsch ist) und auf eine andere Straße ein direction=backward gesetzt, das dort keinen Sinn hat.
waldhans (2017-07-01 11:28:33+00:00): Danke für den netten Hinweis, direction=backward gehört natürlich auf das Stoppschild. Da habe ich wohl dummerweise den Weg erwischt. Habe ich soeben behoben. Bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung!

Ein Hinweis: beim way 42483458 stimmt irgendwas mit dem lane-tagging nicht: "lanes=2" und "none|through|slight_right" passt vielleicht nicht ganz. Schau dir das bitte mal an.
fkv (2017-07-01 13:00:26+00:00): Das sind also 3 Spuren, darum hab ich jetzt lanes=2 auf lanes=3 geändert. Aber normalerweise hab ich mit lanes-Tagging nicht viel am Hut, weil ich es in dieser Form nutzlos finde.
frosm (2019-03-29 00:47:39+00:00): bonjour,
c'est quoi un poteau de type sd ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571994902
Kazing (2019-03-29 12:57:47+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est issu d'un erreur en rentrant les tags je pense. J'ai supprimé bollard_type; "barrier=bollard" est suffisant;
Merci et bonne journée
frosm (2019-03-29 13:01:52+00:00): Merci. bonne journée également.
alphensebezorger (2017-06-16 22:51:45+00:00): Volgens NWB wegvakken is de straatnaam van de fietspaden Avenue Carnisse. Heb jij bij je survey straatnaambordjes aangetroffen met Avenue Carré?
user_3216889 (2017-06-21 21:52:59+00:00): Bij een revert van xx wijzigingen kan het voorkomen dat een ervan toch wel klopte. Hoewel het technisch mogelijk is die ene uit te zonderen bij een revert, heb ik wel wat beters te doen. Alvorens een revert toe te passen, heb ik er al heel wat tijd ingestoken.
Maar het staat eenieder vrij dit alsnog te corrigeren.
Nakaner (2017-06-18 11:30:49+00:00): Hallo Ruhrpottkast,

welches Luftbild hast du denn für diesen Änderungssatz verwendet?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Ruhrpottkast (2017-06-18 12:56:01+00:00): Bing
IknowJoseph (2017-11-20 18:18:43+00:00): Please could you explain what you did here? Many of these ways - such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33659553#map=16/3.8216/23.6711 - are clearly just junk. Suggest they be removed rather than just tagged.
IknowJoseph (2017-11-27 20:30:55+00:00): Some very junk ways around here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33675134#map=14/3.7099/23.7799 - any reason to keep??
clairedelune (2018-01-23 00:30:03+00:00): Initial roads were not junk. This changeset had mistakenly squared the highways. As it was causing too much trouble, I had to revert it.
nammala (2017-06-16 05:25:54+00:00): Hi Cantika,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM), Noticed that you have added park over buildings which is  not appropriate. OSM is the real map of the world. Every data we add should be ground truth not fictional data. 
Please do add valubale data on map.

Best regards,
nammala
Carlos Brys (2017-10-30 21:16:32+00:00): En la paradas de colectivo no va los numeros de linea. Se debe indicar el nombre de la calle: Ej: Rodriguez y Zapiola
IknowJoseph (2017-11-20 18:30:12+00:00): Likewise with way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33668794#map=16/4.1460/27.8516 - is this an actual unclassified road in real life? Could you explain how you came to tag as such?
BCNorwich (2017-06-16 06:03:19+00:00): Hello There, just wanted to let you know that the park area (453552380, v2) has become distorted. Regards
Kalepom (2018-09-05 13:57:35+00:00): Hi, EchoesWhyNot, 
I'm sorry I don't understand your edit here. There is no hostel at that place. What did you wanted to add? Thanks
vira_02 (2019-02-21 19:45:06+00:00): Hi Aisah

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 500815405, way 500816382 & way 500828980 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
snigdhap (2019-02-27 06:12:14+00:00): "Hi Yunita sari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 204243269 
way 499904866 and the connecting roads classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Industrial'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
ioanam_telenav (2017-10-11 13:19:52+00:00): Hello, IanH!

I saw that you have added the tag bridge:yes for way 11634236. May I know the source of your edit?

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Ioana.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-06-16 14:06:29+00:00): [Batangas City] rename some POIs
Glassman (2017-06-16 04:59:48+00:00): The OSM convention is to use the full street name, ie no abbreviations. I went ahead and fixed the. Great additions!
nammala (2017-06-16 05:13:05+00:00): Hi , 

Make sure you edit the park in correct shape rather than random editing.

Regards,
nammala
Carnildo (2017-06-16 18:37:43+00:00): Best practice for indicating a business is closed is to prefix the "shop" tag with "disused:" (for example, "disused:shop=doityourself"), and to do the same with the "name" tag if the signs have been removed.  If the signs are still there, leaving the "name" tag alone means that people can still use the building as a landmark for navigation.

What you've done will be interpreted by computers as meaning there's a do-it-yourself business there by the name of "Vacant".
divya_sree (2019-03-11 16:33:48+00:00): Hi Riyadi Wibowo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the ways below
way 500055519
way 120385528
way 563169820
classified as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. 
Doing necessary changes as of now. Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance.
Riyadi Wibowo (2019-03-12 06:41:59+00:00): hi divya_sree. i did field survey in this area. (check my gpx). i think tertiary is more legit and valid than unclassified.
fyi unclassified roads may be unpaved in larger, poorer or more remote/rural areas, and are typically paved in denser, richer or more central/urban areas. (OMS Wiki)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified. so you can return it into tertiary roads. thanks
divya_sree (2019-03-12 09:45:21+00:00): Hi Riyadi Wibowo,
 Thanks for your response will be proceeding as per your suggestion(Classification as Teritiary).
RichRico (2017-06-27 18:45:57+00:00): Hi maxerickson
Thanks for contributing whit osm
I found a changeset where you changed a atribute  place=town to place = village, and according wikipedia is a Town.
Regards
maxerickson (2017-06-27 20:25:11+00:00): Yes, in the US wikipedia isn't a useful source for deciding the prominence of a place, as it just lists the legal incorporation type of the place.

I've had this conversation with a couple other Mapbox folks (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49451105 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49455542 ), maybe whatever is reporting those errors can be adjusted to report fewer of them?

I would suggest that for imported TIGER administrative boundaries in the US it isn't worth tracking place= at all, because they are a huge mess and need a lot of cleanup.
nammala (2017-06-16 05:46:20+00:00): Hi Tony17cx,

Noticed that you are adding fictional data parks over buildings and also footways randomly. OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world and make sure we add good data not bad data. I am reverting your changeset. Please don't add fictional data on map.

Best Regards,
nammala
user_5359 (2017-09-04 14:27:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
chnav (2017-06-18 07:35:11+00:00): В этой правке вы удалили корректные здания, которые были грамотно отрисованы и соединены углами. Вместо них нарисовали кривые. Пожалуйста не удаляйте данные.
Sanniu (2017-06-28 07:07:47+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500763348 - is it roundabout?
Flayer (2017-06-28 08:00:00+00:00): Yes.
Sanniu (2017-06-28 09:01:40+00:00): ok, fixed
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 07:31:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Поле name используется не для описания объектов, а для наименований (имен собственных). То, что это церковь ясно из building=church, а что это религиозное место ясно из amenity=place_of_worship. Значения из name я вычищаю. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500855295 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500855296
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 07:39:30+00:00): Также вы повесили на контур территории тег здания building=yes. По снимкам это не здание. 
И просьба к вам: при отрисовке зданий использовать спрямление углов. В редакторе iD этот или горячая клавиша S или нажатие правой кнопкой мыши на контур - и соответствующий пункт "спрямить углы"
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Commodoortje (2017-06-17 07:25:21+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
RicoElectrico (2017-06-16 16:19:06+00:00): Cześć, witaj w OSM, dawno nie spotkałem kogoś z Rumi, a tu drugi mapowicz w ciągu dnia :)

Mam tylko taką małą techniczną uwagę. Obrysy budynków - jeśli mają proste kąty - trzeba naprostować do idealnych 90 stopni. W edytorze iD robi to klawisz S.

Życzę miłego dalszego mapowania, bo w Rumi jest na pewno wciąż dużo do zrobienia - chociażby mało zmapowano sklepów, a już w ogóle ze szczegółami typu godziny otwarcia.

Jeśli masz jakieś pytania, to pisz śmiało.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-27 07:37:28+00:00): I changed seasonal=grade5 to tracktype=grade5, is this guess correct?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-27 07:37:45+00:00): I did it for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500866537
Warin61 (2017-06-17 04:45:08+00:00): Hi
Way 54844658 - Rockley Pub Sch .. OSM inspector said duplicate_node. Best to use the LPI base map - that has the legal boundaries. The School does not extend to the middle of the road. I have edited it ..
RicoElectrico (2017-06-18 20:20:31+00:00): This is another changeset which references this training. Can you give any details? It seems the users who are being trained make many mistakes. Please tell me who organizes this training.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Cascafico (2017-06-16 08:24:58+00:00): Ciao!

si solito mettiamo nomi e titoli per esteso (Santa Lucia...).

Sei sicuro di "Murlisa"? Che fonte?
Ars-UA (2017-06-16 09:06:28+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness
RicoElectrico (2017-06-22 18:04:48+00:00): Nie sądzę, by podpadało to pod park. Możesz wyjaśnić co masz na myśli mówiąc o "koncepcji"? My tu mapujemy rzeczy, które istnieją na ziemi, a nie czyjeś koncepcje.
Marcislaw (2017-06-27 17:21:10+00:00): Zamiast oczka wodnego deweloper zrobił skwer / park bo mu się zmieniło i pewnie wyszło taniej. Wolisz prawdę czy plany?
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 10:49:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не используйте капслок в наименованиях https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D0.BF.D0.B8.D1.88.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.9A.D0.90.D0.9F.D0.A1.D0.9B.D0.9E.D0.9A.D0.9E.D0.9C
mueschel (2017-06-16 18:05:23+00:00): Hi,
welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few.
Cheers, Jan
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 11:05:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Получилось не очень. Я сейчас переделаю как должно быть в идеале, а вы можете посмотреть. И редактор iD не удобен при редактировании отношений. Я бы рекомендовал попробовать пересесть на http://josm.ru/ и плагин reltoolbox.
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 11:14:23+00:00): Части зданий (building:part) у вас были отрисованы верно. Я сделал их мультиполигонами (это необязательно, но так проще). Общий контур здания, который был мультиполигоном был некорректный. То отношение type=building, о котором вы упоминаете в описании к пакету правок я создал. Роли для участников отношения проставил. Если бы у здания были размечены входы, их тоже можно включить в это отношение и указать им роль entrance.
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 11:15:39+00:00): Это отношение делать рекомендуется (вроде бы его использует mapsme для отрисовки трехмерных зданий). Но, могу ошибаться, по вики оно не обязательно.
literan (2017-06-16 12:30:19+00:00): Добавлю, действительно, в iD такие отношения делать сложновато (как и рисовать части зданий мультиполигонами), так что, DMakarov, можете рисовать эти здания просто накладывающимися полигонами, как я вчера показал. Эти способы равноправны.
sa-electronix (2017-06-20 20:53:07+00:00): Klasse arbeit. Ich habe gesehen das du sehr aktiv warst. Schön das Endlich adressen und Hausnummern hinzukommen.
Weiter so. ich habe auch schon einiges eingetragen.
Duetzer (2017-06-21 08:08:16+00:00): Man tut was man kann. ;-) Südlich der Oyther Str. und östlich Botenkamp sollte jetzt alles komplett sein. Nördlich der Oyther Str. und östlich der Eschstr. ist es auch komplett. Werde mich weiter vorarbeiten.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:55:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
user_6110846 (2023-03-06 10:43:00+00:00): припини будь ласка житловим вулицям додавати тег noname=yes 

яке блін село Збаразької громади не візьмеш кругом у житлових вулицях твоя херня
VARVAR8 (2023-03-12 13:09:45+00:00): А нічого що це було більше 5 років тому? ;)
А якщо знаєш назву, достатньо змінити тег. У чому проблема?
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:51:16+00:00): Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
Szabi Nyikó (2021-02-17 09:39:51+00:00): Hi there,
Just wondering if this was still relevant or perhaps the tag could be now deleted?
Thanks,
Szabi
Commodoortje (2017-06-17 07:13:01+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.