piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-11-27 15:39:03+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Тем не менее нужно обязательно сдвигать спутниковые снимки под GPS-треки перед редактированием.  
Вы использовали JOSM. Для него есть специальный плагин для сохранения/загрузки смещений спутниковых снимков.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:JOSM/Plugins/Imagery_Offset_Database
mueschel (2018-11-30 11:47:38+00:00): Hi,
the different "dwellings:..." tags you're using here are new. Could you describe what they mean? E.g. 

dwellings:PLAI=0
dwellings:PLS=0
dwellings:PLUS=88

Thanks, Jan
Béaba (2018-12-03 08:13:30+00:00): Hi,
It's a typology of social housing.

Béa
mueschel (2018-12-03 18:40:17+00:00): Did you write some documentation for these new tags? Without a proper documentation in the Wiki, these are useless for other mappers.
user_3022894 (2019-01-04 15:11:19+00:00): Hi exmatrikulator,
diese hier von dir markierte Einbahnstraße: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154685342/history ist keine. Ich weiß, das liegt nahe, wegen der Dörner Brücke, die nur in eine Richtung befahren werden darf. Aber in diesem Straßenteil darf man in beide Richtungen fahren. Auf Mapillary erkennt man auch das Vorfahrt gewähren-Schild an der Kreuzung Unterdörnen.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
user_3022894 (2019-02-12 09:30:56+00:00): wahrscheinlich landen diese Changesetkommentare irgenwo, nur nicht im Postfach des Users. Ist ja auch egal, ich setze die betroffene Straße (vor der eigentlichen Brücke) jetzt auf oneway=no.
LLlypuk82 (2019-09-26 11:02:10+00:00): уточните, пожалуйста типы магазинов (потому что названия ни о чём не говорят и не ясно, что там продают)
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SomeoneElse (2018-11-25 19:13:36+00:00): Actually "lit roads" off Hull Road and Thief Lane.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kukułka (2018-11-28 20:10:10+00:00): Cześć.
>można przypiąć 2 rowery - 
To prawda - jeśli je traktować jak stojaki, bo tak wyglądają. Choć w wielu miastach jedno stanowisko (tej samej firmy) jest dla jednego roweru https://www.google.pl/maps/@51.1169897,17.0335463,3a,80y,266.59h,69.23t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipPa72NWmtUSYmS86DmuYaAIONnYZk22cAKcmaQ!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPa72NWmtUSYmS86DmuYaAIONnYZk22cAKcmaQ%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya214.12582-ro-0-fo100!7i13312!8i6656
ale tu ma być podobno inna generacja.
Generalnie bym poczekał i zobaczył co dalej, na razie jest dużo niewiadomych.
Co do nazwy - mam podobną opinię - choć  w innych miastach jest ona definiowana nazwą ulicy, więęc na poczatek tak zgapiłem. 
Na razie jeszcze nie działa ich strona, ta z tabliczek na ulicy
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Miselajus (2018-11-27 22:06:27+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,
hier mal ein link zu einem Foto von der Örtlichkeit, wie ich sie Anfang 2018 vorfunden habe:

https://de.share-your-photo.com/b7345febab

Demnach wäre mein tagging schon korrekt, wenn auch nicht optimal gewesen. Denn an dieser Stelle befindet sich sowohl ein Rettungspunkt der Niedersächsischen Landesforsten (rot, Gö-1) als auch einer von Hessen-Forst (grün, Gö-120). Vielleicht sollte man an dieser Stelle zwei nodes einstellen, entweder übereinander oder nebeneinander. 
Gruß
Miselajus
DD1GJ (2018-11-27 22:58:30+00:00): Hallo Miselajus,

Danke für das Bild. Ich habe nun auch unseren Mailwechsel zu diesem Punkt aus dem vergangenen Jahr entdeckt und nochmal durchgelesen. Auch wenn beide am gleichen Pfahl sind, habe ich knapp daneben den GÖ-1 angelegt, so dass beide Punkte nun beim Abgleich erkannt werden. In den amtlichen Unterlagen steht er als GÖ-1H. Rettungspunkte sind und bleiben wohl teilweise chaotisch. Viele Grüße, Joachim
pacman541 (2018-11-26 08:40:35+00:00): Парк вместо девятиэтажки?
Удаляю
woodpeck (2018-12-16 00:46:33+00:00): This changeset, as well as other world-wide or large-scale edits you have made, is a mechanical edit that requires prior discussion with the community. Have you discussed these edits, and if so, where?

Also, in this changeset you have changed several jewish places of worship to "building=synagogue". The building tag is used to say what the building was constructed as, not what purpose it currently serves. Have you researched that all the buildings you changed were indeed built as synagogues, or did you just make a guess?
GBAB (2018-12-17 08:36:41+00:00): Dear Woodpeck,

thank you for you comments.

According to OSM Wiki, <reform> is a jewish denomination while <reformed> is a christian one. So if e.g. a christian place of worship is tagged with <denomination=reform> of vice versa, that is a simple tagging mistake/mismatch. I think I can't be wrong here (apart, perhaps, from a very unlikely case when the denomination is correct and the religion is not but this can be checked easily e.g. by its name).

As for the buildings: if a whole building is tagged as a place of worship then you can very reasonably consider it a (christian) church or a (jewish) synagogue. It is also quite rare that a building was built for something and then, later, it becomes a synagogue. (The opposite is, sadly, less rare, at least in my region, Central Europe.)

When editing, I tried to find pictures on the internet of the given facilities and these mostly confirmed this.

Nevertheless, I am a human, so, obviously, I can be wrong as well.

King regards

GBAB / Gábor Babos
ika-chan! (2019-06-23 23:32:07+00:00): What is the source for the erotic shop? It might be a typo or something.
R0bst3r (2018-12-05 08:27:47+00:00): Hallo squirrel_einhoernchen,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Vielleicht aber auch etwas zu viel des guten. Eine offizielle Adresse hat der Container wohl nicht und der Name sollte eher in die Beschreibung, da in das name Tag nur Eigennamen sollten.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64876554
maraf24 (2018-11-29 18:47:49+00:00): Takie informacje jak w komentarzu do zestawu zmian trzeba umieszczać w uwadze. Komentarz tutaj czyta się sporadycznie.
KAROL1966 (2018-11-29 19:29:42+00:00): Wpisuję, bo po zmianie, widzę okno do wypełnienia.
maraf24 (2018-11-29 20:01:42+00:00): I wpisanie tego tu jest ok, ale jeśli chcesz, by ktoś to na pewno przeczytał i zareagował, to trzeba komentarz lepiej uwidocznić - właśnie w uwadze. Nie trzeba pisać dwa razy - wystarczyłoby w uwadze dać link do tego zestawu zmian.
Wilmer Osario (2018-11-25 20:59:00+00:00): Estaba esperando para hacerlo en su debido tiempo, ya que estoy cartografiando a máximo detalle toda la ciudad. Pero igualmente gracias 😆.
un usuario (2018-11-26 06:29:21+00:00): De nada jeje 😁
felipeeugenio (2019-04-15 01:01:52+00:00): Hola
Porque se llama Pablo Neruda la Salida? Está bien?
saludos
tren_sur (2019-04-15 02:52:52+00:00): Los enlaces de autopista tienen nombre, y en este caso éste se llama "Pablo Neruda". No suelen estar señalizados los nombres, pero en este caso si lo está, con señales que están en las pistas de salida.

Saludos
freebeer (2018-11-26 08:31:10+00:00): in the unlikely even someone is confused by the inapplicable hogs/dogs changeset comment, refer to resolved note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1600389 to clarify or muddle the waters as you see fit.  or something.

thanks.  maybe.  or not.  who am i, and why am i here?  42.
viloan (2018-11-25 21:10:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kasmar00 (2018-11-29 18:46:01+00:00): Chyba przez przypadek zostawiłeś tą linie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295786057 i przy okazji rozciąłeś trochę relacji autobusowych. Relacje mogę naprawić ale dopiero jak będę wiedział co z podlinkowaną linią.
maraf24 (2018-11-29 22:39:26+00:00): Tak, zostawiłem tu parę śmieci. Poprawiłem - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65026922
Dzięki.
Nie są mi tu znane rozcięte relacje autobusowe.
kasmar00 (2018-11-30 16:13:12+00:00): Faktycznie, posłużyłem się tym narzędziem http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=16.88901&lat=52.40964&zoom=18 i zobaczyłem dużo "invalid routes". Chodziło jednak o tą krótką pozostałość, która nadal była członkiem relacji i tworzyła dziury.
BCNorwich (2018-11-26 07:16:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure these addresses are correct? If so will you please state the source of your information? Thanks.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-11-29 07:47:32+00:00): No response so I've amended the addresses. Regards Bernard.
mueschel (2018-12-06 11:37:39+00:00): Hallo,
im Falle von diesem Weg sollte es "destination:symbol:to:forward" heißen, weil das Symbol ja zum "destination:ref:to" gehört. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387618142

Gruß
Jan
mgpx (2018-11-25 22:46:26+00:00): Ez nem ugyanaz a kilátó, amit az OSM DNy irányban pár méterrel arrébb már jelez ?
southglos (2018-11-25 22:09:49+00:00): Hi
Which boundary do you think might need checking - can't see anything obvious?
I've also removed accidental addr:street tags from the corners nodes of some of the houses.

Thanks for adding all those addresses.  All appreciated!
Tim Davies (2018-11-26 08:27:31+00:00): Thanks for the check. I thought I might have accidentally moved a neighbourhood boundary when trying the generalise buildings plugin (which then seemed not to have an undo) - but looks from this changeset like I didn't :) 

(Still getting used to working with JOSM). 

I'll look out for street-tags on the corner nodes in future to avoid adding those

Thanks for the review and feedback :)
francisbarton (2020-02-23 14:02:32+00:00): Great work Tim! As an erstwhile resident of the Horny Toad, I know how messy the numbering system is and how it can be tricky for visitors. Hopefully this will help.
woodpeck (2018-11-25 22:16:05+00:00): Mir ist unklar, wieso hier der Way 648872200 als service=driveway nach einem Wendekreis ausgeführt wurde, aus dem Luftbild ist kein Unterschied zur Straße davor zu erkennen. Ich verstehe auch nicht, wieso u.a. die Gebäude NR. 23 und 36 kleine extra-Teile haben, während die in genau gleicher Bauart angebauten Garagen (?) der Gebäude 31 und 33 mit dem Hauptgebäude eine Einheit bilden. Steckt da ein System dahinter oder ist das Willkür?
user_1470980 (2018-11-25 22:50:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, der Wendekreis war unangebracht, ich habe diesen entfernt.

Bei den von Dir erwähnten Gebäuden, fließt die Dachfläche des Hauptgebäude –laut Luftbild- geschlossen über die Garage. Man könnte die kleine verbleibende Ecke noch separat Mappen, das ergibt aber über einen gedachten Grundriss der Garage keinen Sinn. Oft ist bei solchen Konstruktionen -aufgrund der verfügbaren größeren Raumhöhe über der Garage-, der Raum über der Garage zum Wohnraum ausgebaut. Daher schlage ich, sofern das Dach über die Garage fließt diese zum Hauptgebäude hinzu.
Grüße Johann
user_1470980 (2018-11-26 11:54:38+00:00): Bei dieser Gelegenheit, hast Du irgend eine Ahnung, wer sich hinter dem Pseudonym 4rch verbirgt?
vasony (2019-01-30 06:36:14+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6091026363

A noexit=yes nem a tábla helyét jelöli, hanem az utolsó pontot, de csak akkor ha semmilyen módon nem lehet tovább menni. (itt az utca végén pl lehet gyalog)

ld:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
viloan (2018-11-25 22:21:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
atcomapper (2018-11-26 07:20:07+00:00): Det går altså ikke at du flytter rundt på adresser i OSM. Adresserne er importeret fra Danmarks Adresseregister, og vil helt automatisk blive flyttet tilbage igen. Hvis du mener de ligger forkert, skal du kontakte Allerød Kommune, som kan rette fejlen i Danmarks Adresseregister.
maraf24 (2018-11-26 21:32:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2018-11-26 07:44:56+00:00): Dag jgums.. De info heb ik naar de officiële adresnode verplaatst. 
MVG,
Eggie
حمدلة (2018-11-28 16:31:03+00:00): This looks like a mechanic deletion. Do you know that you are acting like a dictator when you change certain features (multipolygons) just because you don't like them?
naoliv (2018-11-28 16:35:07+00:00): 1) the comment was sarcastic
2) it took me almost 4 days for this
3) it was all manual
4) did you verify what I did or did you just read the commen and conclude that it was a mechanical edition?
حمدلة (2018-11-30 19:20:53+00:00): Anyway: Why have you touched a massive amount of features just because you didn't like the _style_ of how they were mapped?
naoliv (2018-11-30 19:30:36+00:00): 🙄
Phyks (2018-11-26 10:04:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis suite à la demande de relecture sur ce lot de modifications.

Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235605171, il est passé de "highway=cycleway" à "highway=path" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpath). Je ne connais pas le terrain, est-ce bien un chemin ? Ou plutôt une piste cyclable ("cycleway", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway) ou promenade piéton ("footway", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dfootway).

Si ce chemin est une piste partagée entre piétons et vélos, l'utilisation des tags d'accès (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access) et de segregated (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:segregated) pourrait être mieux.


Concernant la nouvelle "cycleway" ajoutée le long de la Rue de la Dronnière, il y a peut être un problème avec les annotations sur la rue. La rue indique qu'il y a un "cycleway=lane" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245779978). Une "cycleway" séparée est une piste physiquement séparée de la route (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle). Trois possibilités ici :
* Soit il y a à la fois une piste cyclable séparée et une bande sur la route, auquel cas l'annotation actuelle est correcte.
* Soit il n'y a qu'une piste cyclable séparée, auquel cas l'annotation sur la route devrait être supprimée.
* Soit il n'y a qu'une bande cyclable sur la route, auquel cas la nouvelle "cycleway" devrait être supprimée.

Bonne journée !
Sam72-14 (2018-11-26 17:32:58+00:00): Pour le 1er, c'est un chemin voir une friche.

Pour la piste cyclable, celle ci est nouvelle et dorénavant totalement séparé de la route :) .

Merci pour la correction
Phyks (2018-11-26 20:02:07+00:00): Ok pour le chemin et pour la piste cyclable.

Concernant la section de la Rue de la Dronnière, je vois que vous avez supprimé le tag "cycleway=lane". S'il n'y a plus aucune bande cyclable (dans aucun sens de circulation) sur cet axe, ça me semble bon.

Bonne soirée,
Haris IRM-ED (2023-01-13 07:39:48+00:00): Hi, Lauretta_J.

Thank you for mapping contribution! Currently, I'm doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network in Myanmar.

I need your help, especially with this railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/648891140) that located in this coordinate (17.3911312, 95.359981). 
I saw this railway was really short and almost close together with existing primary road, Due to my lack of local knowledge in that area, i'd like to know if it just accidentally made or it really does exist. Any information will be really helpful for validating purpose.


Thanks for your understanding, and Happy Mapping!
abakus_uploader (2018-11-26 23:30:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
VA00 (2019-02-27 18:34:04+00:00): Nie przypominam sobie, aby tu była jakakolwiek ścieżka.
maraf24 (2019-02-27 21:00:09+00:00): Widać zarośniętą ścieżkę na orto.
aTarom (2023-02-09 10:14:20+00:00): Hola Santi2222,
puedes ayudarme a corregir este valor de maxspeed?
"maxspeed"="algo"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218661046/history

Saludos cordiales y gracias por editar
Santi2222 (2023-02-20 12:15:44+00:00): Uh, imagino que puse ese valor para activar/desactivar algún filtro en JOSM y se me pasó quitarlo antes de subir... Lo he cambiado a 220 que es el valor de la vía adyacente, aunque tampoco es seguro. Gracias por avisar!
VA00 (2019-11-02 08:09:51+00:00): Chciałbym zobaczyć jak tam jedziesz rowerem
pan_borsuk (2019-11-04 12:24:28+00:00): jeszcze się zdziwisz! od pół roku mam też rower z wystarczająco Wąską kierownicą :-P (ps. traktuje to jako wyzwanie) ale najpierw ocenie stan ..zachaszczenia
VA00 (2020-03-18 17:01:08+00:00): Bez jaj, NO PARASAN. Zarosło do połowy, a początek ostrężynami. Parafrazując: ulica nazywa się Wąska, jest wąska i będzie otagowana jako wąska, Wąski :-)
mueschel (2018-12-05 11:47:01+00:00): Hi,
you added several antennas here - could you check the spelling of the tag "antenna:polarzation"? There is an 'i' missing and OSM uses British spelling. It should be "antenna:polarisation"

Cheers, Jan
viloan (2018-11-26 00:21:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GOwin (2018-12-05 02:17:29+00:00): Hi there. When tracing buildings, remember to avoid connecting them to other objects (buildings, roads, etcetera) unless they are physically connected in real life.

Buildings are rarely directly connected to roads.
L Mu (2019-04-13 21:19:35+00:00): Did you maybe mix up hostal Betty and Doña Irma? Because Hostal Doña Irma is (now?) where you mapped hostal Betty. Don't know about the later one...
smaprs (2018-11-30 00:48:32+00:00): Estas vias estão passando por cima de várias casas:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648923211    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648923213   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648923215
smaprs (2018-11-30 00:51:27+00:00): Por favor, coloque comentários de onde e o quê você está editando.  
Ok? Pode ser assim?
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:37:36+00:00): ¿Por qué debo comentar el conjunto de cambios?  
Hay muchas razones...:  
-Por cortesía a sus compañeros editores del mapa, ya que les facilita entender lo que hizo y por qué...  
-Para evitar malos entendidos y que los errores se puedan arreglar rápidamente..., etc,etc.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:39:19+00:00): *Ocasionalmente, você pode ser contatado por outros mapeadores questionando sobre suas edições. Por favor, não ignore mensagens de outros. Se outro mapeador investiu tempo para examinar sua edição e contatar-lhe com alguma pergunta, as perguntas merecem uma resposta.*  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map
Warin61 (2018-11-27 23:30:50+00:00): ??? A roundabout .. ??? What is that doing there? 
Note - source not the LPI Base Map, nor any imagery.
Velo Mapper (2018-11-29 06:33:08+00:00): It's new roundabout into under constraction estate .
un usuario (2018-11-26 10:16:56+00:00): Hola Wilmer, 
Si necesitas que te eche una mano por Venezuela no dudes en contactar conmigo, ya sea en el trazado de calles, añadir edificios etc...
Saludos desde España 😉
user_7073950 (2019-05-30 18:10:53+00:00): questa linea senza tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38816591#map=13/44.7919/10.2684 

cos'è??
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2018-12-04 03:13:47+00:00): Hallo Yockie apa sudah dibenerin duplikat2 nya.? Kalau belum juga akan saya hapus data2 tersebut, karna saya yakin Anda melakukan import data
mavl (2018-12-23 16:13:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GOwin (2018-12-05 02:06:02+00:00): Good work, @norbertombueno!

When adding farmlands, you don't need to add a place name that describe it's function (eg. "Ricefields"). Instead, add a tag crop=rice in the area that you digitized as such.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:13:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:13:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:12:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:12:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:12:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:12:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-23 16:12:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.