piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OSMPossum (2022-01-18 19:17:17+00:00): Estimado EscuderoCorArq,

Gracias por sus contribuciones en OSM! Noté que agregaste este carretera Trunk  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020405352) y esta relación (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13663084) afirmando que la carretera es necesaria para la planificación vial. Ya existe un característica de carretera Tertiary que representa  Calle Juan de la Luz Enríquez en OSM, por lo tanto, no se necesita una función de carretera adicional y crea problemas de validación. ¿Estás sugiriendo que se agregará infraestructura vial adicional a Calle Juan de la Luz Enrí,quez? Si ese es el caso, hay etiquetas mas apropiadas que puede usar para representar eso. En OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) se proporciona enlaces a orientación sobre como mapear varias características. Mirando las características que asignaste, me pregunto si `highway=proposed` y `proposed=trunk` como se describe en el Highway Proposed Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed) podría ser apropiado? Esta combinación de etiquetas se utiliza para representar una carretera que está a punto de construirse pero que aún no ha comenzado. Déjame saber tu pensamiento! 

Además la comunidad de OSM Mexico tiene un Forum, un grupo de Facebook y un chat de Telegram si deseas unirse y hacer otras preguntas o hablar con otros mapeadores. 

Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=79
Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/OSMMX
Telegram chat: https://t.me/osm_mx

Cordialmente,

OSMPossum
Dodko (2022-01-13 07:22:48+00:00): Cestu ktorú ste predlžovali https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696115739 naozaj ide tak stredom poľa?
https://www.freemap.sk/?map=19/48.765638/18.151128&layers=X
https://www.freemap.sk/?map=19/48.765638/18.151128&layers=Z

Zároveň novému úseku sa malo zmeniť tracktype https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype
detroit9 (2022-01-26 11:43:01+00:00): Snímky sú neaktuálne, resp. nie je z nich dobre vidieť, že cesta ide cez obyčajnú lúku. Cesta je len pokračovaním toho, čo už tam bolo, preto som nemenil jej typ.
Dodko (2022-01-26 12:21:59+00:00): Cez značku tracktype sa dá vyjadriť kvalita/pevnosť danej cesty.
Ak sa mení je dobré cestu rozsekať na menšie úseky a označiť.
Nové ortofoto 2021 za stredné slovensko by malo vyjsť v máji.
archpdx (2022-02-21 19:10:42+00:00): Hi,
Why did you add building=industrial to substations such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12333319? Only buildings within these substations should have this tag.

I also noticed that you changed water works such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135245347 to substations. Please make sure when you're selecting a preset such as LADWP that you look at the feature type below the name to make sure that it isn't a different type of feature. If one doesn't exist for that feature type, consider opening an issue on NSI: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/new

I've added presets for wastewater plants and water works for LADWP, but note that these won't show up in the editor until next week.
chlenix (2024-02-20 18:05:00+00:00): а чого повидаляли ті всі полігони?
user_5359 (2022-01-12 06:14:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020408643/history. You add a way without any OSM keys.
user_14117678 (2022-01-12 15:33:34+00:00): Szanowany użytkowniku, wprowadziłeś niepoprawne zmiany: uszkodziłeś park rekreacyjno-sportowy. Proszę napraw to, ponieważ w przeciwnym wypadku będę zmuszony zrevertować ten zestaw zmian :)
cheatach (2022-01-12 17:44:38+00:00): Niczego nie uszkodziłem, to ty bezzasadnie rozszerzasz ten obszar a ponadto obchodząc bany mapowaniem z nowych kont łamiesz regulamin, udzielaj się z pierwotnego konta "RotaniMilE" to pogadamy :)
user_14117678 (2022-01-12 19:41:02+00:00): Wręcz przeciwnie, swoimi zmianami uszkodziłeś obszar parku rekreacyjno-sportowego. Nie mogę się udzielać ze wspomnianego konta, ponieważ 1) multikonta są zabronione i 2) nie znam danych do logowania do konta tego użytkownika.
cheatach (2022-01-13 00:27:42+00:00): jak ja mogłem uszkodzić jak to ty przyszedłeś i zmieniasz xD skoro zabronione to przestań z nich korzystać
user_14117678 (2022-01-13 21:30:27+00:00): Uszkodziłeś poprawnie zmapowany park.
Lukas615 (2022-12-10 13:36:44+00:00): Hallo,
bitte beachte, dass wir die Daten aus dem Anlagenportal Netz der DB nicht als Quelle benutzen dürfen, da diese nicht für OpenStreetMap mit der entsprechenden Lizenz freigegeben sind.
Gruß
Lukas
Blasrohrkobold (2022-01-12 22:58:34+00:00): Hey Mxdanger,

Ihre Änderungen hätten Sie gern lassen können!

Der surface=asphalt auf der Zufahrtsstraße ist redundant, da es bereits auf dem Parkplatz selbst gesetzt ist.

Das noexit=yes hätten Sie sich ebenfalls sparen können. Es handelt sich um keine richtige Straße und anzunehmen, dass Wenden unmöglich ist, ist falsch.

In Zukunft bitte ich um die Nutzung eines ernstzunehmenden Editors.

Liebe Grüße
legofahrrad (2022-04-15 16:21:31+00:00): Hallo!
Hat dieses Gebäude wirklich den Eigennamen "Doppel Haus"? Das scheint mir eher eine Beschreibung zu sein.
Viele Grüße
Der r (2022-05-01 17:59:19+00:00): Hallo @legofahrrad , Ich war wegen Unverschuldetem Fahrradunfall und obendrauf zusätzlich wegen Covid außerstande, dir zu antworten.
Natürlich ist deine frage berechtigt,
Der Eigenname "Doppel Haus" ist falsch die Hausnummer .1 ist aber Korrekt. 
Liebe Grüße
mueschel (2022-01-16 14:31:13+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'powerd' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9411449029
JJIglesias (2022-01-16 21:45:14+00:00): A mistake of mine, suppouse to be name of the school. Already corrected.

Thanks for catching that.

BsRgds
JJ
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:12:33+00:00): откатываю, опять ерунда
Lucifer Kinoff (2022-01-12 10:50:28+00:00): Ерунда, - это ваши "откаты"! Да и сам вы туда же.
philam48 (2022-03-09 02:52:28+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your edits @MapAbility. Just a note that railway=tram_crossing is not really for use in mixed traffic conditions like in Melbourne. Really only where the tram is separated from traffic in its own right of way and a path or road crosses. Happy to chat further, thanks!
MapAbility (2022-03-10 10:22:38+00:00): Hi, that makes sense, I'll stop using that node.
Jrachi (2022-02-02 07:26:27+00:00): Ciao.
Il codice ref, o numerto se preferisci, di un sentiero non è il suo nome.
Il ref è già sulla relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13653249#map=18/45.08076/7.39344
Quindi se non ti dispiace rimetti a posto come era prima.
Grazie.
Ivo, Jrachi
Kento Kei (2022-01-13 12:53:46+00:00): oh god thank you for fixing those mistakes, hadn't noticed them
user_5359 (2022-01-13 08:16:21+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302957217. What is the meaning of the tag aaccess = Rua Dois ?
user_5359 (2022-01-13 08:01:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/scuba_diving2.

Please add a comment in general!
nevorah (2022-01-13 08:29:24+00:00): Ok, thanks
eggie (2022-01-12 07:43:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  We voegen alleen zaken aan OSM toe in in het veld te zijn verifieren. Wat is er van Video post .. te zien? Wat is het hier? Waarom in een relatie gezet?
Alleen name= zal niets doen in OSM. 
Bedrijven worden toegevoegd aan een adresnode. Op welk adres zit DaViMM Productie?

MVG
eggie



Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-12 18:39:46+00:00): Poi op gebouw gezet met tag amenity=studio..  Ingang toegevoegd op gebouw omtrek
MVG
eggie
Diacritic (2022-01-12 09:54:53+00:00): Hey :)

Just wondering what the utility of this tagging is?

The postcode and state could already be determined by looking at the administrative boundaries?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116045298
tabjsina (2022-01-13 02:22:35+00:00): Hey, thanks for asking.. if you have insight into how mapping software uses this data (i'm making a lot of assumptions), I'd be interested. But my assumption is in general that the more complete the data, the easier the load is for mapping software to get it right without relying on looking up the chain. I don't actually know where postcodes are registered on the large-area level. I've looked at suburb level administrative boundaries, and they do not seem to have it tagged, yet OSM search is able to offer the postcode
Diacritic (2022-01-13 07:06:11+00:00): I'm happy to give a very basic explanation; obviously every piece of software/implementation will be different and I am in no way an expert. :)

The default OSM map using Nominatim (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim) to convert search queries to actual locations. The way it works is pretty neat: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=9242317546&class=place

If the postcode is attached to the suburb relation (which, in Noble Park's case, it isn't), it can pull the data from there, otherwise it does rely on some "magic" by looking at places nearby. The quickest way to attach a postcode to all these houses would be to add it to the suburb relation, which will allow the postcode to flow through with the suburb (https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=6150731669&class=building)

For other programs and services, determining which boundaries apply to a particular point is a fairly standard function of GIS software. I can appreciate your concern about computational load, though I would suggest that the extra storage space required for the postcodes on each node would outweigh any marginal benefit.
tabjsina (2022-01-14 06:04:22+00:00): Hey thanks for the detailed explanation -- I think what you mentioned is likely true, the suburb admin boundary should contain the postcode.. i haven't seen that done, but i'm sure somewhere has an example. After my message I also started exploring nominatim and discovered what you described, that the post code is inferred from the surrounding addresses (which relies on at least some addresses having them :) ). I think I'm somewhat on the fence about whether there is any harm in completing the address 
per way/node, though you've shown that in at least many/most cases its not necessary, and it appears as though nominatim itself is the key to finding these boundaries with OSM -- On the other hand, I'm respectfully not convinced that it is harmful to include these tags (as far as bloat goes). I am on the fence about removing or keeping the challenge active. Most of Australian addresse node/ways provides addr:postcode along with a suburb+street. I think Australian Tagging Guidelines could benefit with some clarity on addresses in general, but not sure of the correct forum to start that discussion. At least discussing the merits of the default keys provided by id in Australia
Diacritic (2022-01-14 21:58:54+00:00): No worries :)

I certainly don't feel as though it is causing any harm by adding this data to nodes, and I wouldn't advocate for someone to actively remove the data that has already been added. I reached out because I saw you were potentially about to embark on a large piece of work with the challengre -  I know how it feels to work on a big project only to find it's less important than I first thought. My free time is limited these days, and my fear of opportunity costs is real :)

Definitely agree with you that there could be some clarity on the Australian Guidelines. I'm not sure if you are already on the talk-au mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au) but I've found it to be relatively active and everyone I've encountered has been helpful and encouraging.
tabjsina (2022-01-17 00:22:34+00:00): Cheers mate, appreciate the guidance and care here -- I've just recently moved from Seattle a couple years ago, so I haven't looked into which community channels were active in Aus (except for slack) - I'll join the mailing list, thanks for the recommendation
woodpeck (2022-09-28 12:30:58+00:00): Dear AndreyGeograf, can you specify a source for this information?
AndreyGeograf (2022-09-28 17:03:52+00:00): I'm sorry, I can't do anything anymore. You're late, I've already been blocked :)) If you have any doubts, you can just roll back my edits.

Don't worry, I didn't put anything on the map that was against the rules.
JJIglesias (2022-01-12 01:12:19+00:00): Si puedes agregar datos de contacto como las etiquetas: Phone, email, contact:mobile; etc ayudarias mas al mapa q solo poner un nodo con un nombre. Gracias
vulasala (2022-01-13 05:22:24+00:00): Hi Open Paint Maps,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 913906112 and way 885076964, as there is a classification gap and the path leading to single rooftop.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116046396
kartler175 (2022-01-12 10:35:01+00:00): Was ist hier bitte verbesstert? Ich sehe nur ein kaputtes Multipolygon.
kartler175 (2022-01-12 10:36:19+00:00): Siehe OSM Inspector: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.13774&lat=51.50699&zoom=13&opacity=0.95
baumann3141 (2022-01-14 04:19:05+00:00): It would be better to upload the edits in different places into separate changesets, this makes it easier for others to review!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116046586
MaddMapper (2022-01-12 01:54:50+00:00): Correction:
Added pedestrian path off of Fyrrevej
Citation: SDFE
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
ScantLeopard336 (2022-01-13 02:53:40+00:00): Hey there, thanks for all the help mapping this area lately!

I think this changeset brings up an interesting issue with Route 10. Mount Pleasant Avenue was the name for the road before the highway was built, and some towns still state the 2 names concurrently. In Whippany and East Hanover where the highway partially doesn't follow the original route, OSM had two Mt. Pleasants running parallel. I think it's correct to remove the name from these sections, but Parsippany's tax maps confirm we should readd the name back to Rt 10 at least there.

I was wondering if you'd come across some other information which led you to remove the name. I know the name isn't on many of the street signs, so I don't blame you for removing it.

Best Regards,
ScantLeopard336
SneakySnoot (2022-02-05 14:42:13+00:00): Hiya,

Sorry for the delayed response. Sure, I can explain myself.

I was driving through that area with navigation on and I was told to turn onto Mt. Pleasant ave when approaching Rt 10. Like you pointed out, there is no Mt.Pleasant Ave street name there.

Next I did some research online for official business on that street and what they identify as their address. Take for example the Social Security Administration Building. From their website, their address says they are located at 2200 NJ-10 2nd Floor, Parsippany, NJ 07054. Searching for that address as Mt. Pleasant in any other maps does not find it.

Next I thought, "well would there be any address conflicts if I left Mt. Pleasant". I did some research and yes. 206 Mt Pleasant Ave, East Hanover, NJ 07936 would conflict with 
206 NJ-10 East Hanover, NJ 07936, and there are others.

And if you go onto FedEx or UPS sites and get an estimate for shipping, 1402 NJ-10, Hanover, NJ 07981 is a valid address but 1402 Mt Pleasant Ave is not.

Hope that is enough, let me know if there is any flaw in my approach
ScantLeopard336 (2022-02-08 06:26:44+00:00): I think you are on the right path, especially since the name= tag is primarily used for whatever name is found on the sign, and that isn't the case (at least until you reach Livingston). But the Mount Pleasant name does seem to be used in some official capacity still. Pulling up the Morris County tax maps at https://morrisgisapps.co.morris.nj.us/apps/morris-tax-maps/ and, for example, we can view Parsippany-Troy Hills Sheet 28 or 28.01 and see the two names concurrent. There are other name tags for more specific scenarios, the wiki has a chart explaining them all 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name . I'm thinking either official_name= or alt_name= would be a much better fit.

On a not so related note, I'm also looking at how Route 10's classification suddenly changes from trunk to primary at I-287. OSM highway classification is a bit weird from a US standpoint, as it's based off the UK system. I was thinking of asking a more experienced local mapper about that, and I can also get an extra opinion on which name tag (if any) would best fit.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
5m4u9 (2022-01-12 13:30:36+00:00): Hola, gracias por tratar de editar y mejorar.

Pero voy a revertir los cambios porque borraste algunos datos históricos y alteraste límites del área protegida.

Ése sector de calles que mejoraste lo preservaré.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
nevw (2022-01-12 05:54:17+00:00): Hi
why is addr:street=Goonyella Road but the street running past Moranbah Apt is named Moranbah Access Road?
Kelz77 (2022-01-12 12:16:17+00:00): Goonyella is the road that turns into the airport
nevw (2022-01-12 12:33:34+00:00): Ok. 
The osm and other maps I have seen all show Goonyella Rd starts in the Moranbah township and goes out to the northwest and the road past the airport is Moranbah Access Rd. If that is incorrect and the road to or past the airport is signed Goonyella Road can you correct it thanks.
user_5359 (2022-01-14 15:13:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Wha ist the meaning of the key "Россия, Омская область, Нововаршавский район, от автомобильной дороги Алкул - Караман - грани-ца республики  Казахстан"? see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020441742
user_5359 (2022-01-13 08:13:48+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481477896. What is the meaning of "(new tag)"
Marcus Salles (2022-01-25 20:27:43+00:00): Desculpe, mas não encontrei o erro apontado na via 481477896 nem na via desta discussão.
Tem certeza que é na via indicada?
user_5359 (2022-01-25 21:16:56+00:00): In any case, the path mentioned is not correct and the erroneous tag has already been corrected. Unfortunately, I cannot provide a correction in a hurry. I apologise for the disturbance.

Em qualquer caso, o caminho mencionado não está correcto e a etiqueta errada já foi corrigida. Infelizmente, não posso fornecer uma correcção à pressa. Peço desculpa pelo distúrbio.
Herman Lee (2022-01-12 07:54:32+00:00): 该修改集已退回
user_11435438 (2022-01-12 08:08:06+00:00): 请注意，你的修改对全世界可见。地图不是以涂鸦来表示爱国之情的地方。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-01-12 08:13:14+00:00): 您好，尊敬的可爱小甜心（小妹妹？）

我觉得这样是不合适的，这就和在公开场合涂鸦一样，在当前阶段还是应以学习为主，不要和我们一样把大好时间浪费在OSM上

——另一个很多年前也叫小甜心的现OSM用户快乐的老鼠宝宝敬上（因为我邮箱就是keaitianxinmail@qq.com）

无论如何，这不好，并且其他编辑者已在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116054623 中回退这次涂鸦
user_14833581 (2022-01-12 09:37:36+00:00): 抱歉抱歉抱歉！是我缺乏经验！我这就删除账号里的东西，不给大家添麻烦
user_14833581 (2022-01-12 09:38:04+00:00): 各位老师好，我是十三中的学生，在考虑如何完成寒假实践里面关于中学生国家意识的作业。中午的时候第一次学着注册了这个平台，接下来还打算注册维基百科和推特的账号，去外网搜集论据，然后我觉得我想画一下我自己的看法，表达我的情感，我就在地图上画了这行字。我并不知道会有这么严重的后果，也谢谢各位老师们的指点，我去研究一下如何删除账号，彻底消灭我的一切编辑和发言，谢谢大家
Herman Lee (2022-01-12 10:08:48+00:00): 其实也没必要这么做，这个账号也没有什么影响的。
Herman Lee (2022-01-12 10:20:13+00:00): @……………………
对于你的描述，我的建议是不要去注册这些境外网站的账号去完成你们的寒假作业，作为作业中所谓的证据，你这么做并不是老师布置这个作业的初衷。中肯地说，推特、维基百科，里面的内容更加杂乱，涉及的问题会更多，有些内容可能会让你误入歧途。还是建议你从国内的网站找一些资料，比如去知网等网站进行查找。
Fnkok (2022-01-12 11:02:52+00:00): 有愛國情感是好的，但是表達要恰當。
完善一下你家附近的路網，比在這裡亂塗鴉好多了。
要多看、多想，切忌情感先行、政治掛帥。
不要一開始就輸出觀點，思辨才能出真知。
Kovoschiz (2022-01-12 09:14:58+00:00): Thank you but please don't delete it to avoid erasing address info. It still represents a shop space. Simply remove the tags.
andyonthewings (2022-01-12 09:23:36+00:00): Hi! Would you explain a little bit more what should be done instead of deleting? I'm pretty new to OSM.

Feel free to correct my mistakes.
Kovoschiz (2022-01-12 09:51:32+00:00): On iD, you can simply change the preset from "Furniture store" to a plain "point". It will discard the feature tags, while keeping other tags.
andyonthewings (2022-01-12 10:13:09+00:00): Got it. Will do so the next time when I find a shop is closed and request a review for the changeset. Thanks!
opendcc (2022-01-12 08:39:24+00:00): Bitte benutze in Bayern DOP80 als Hintergrundbild, da sind weniger Parallaxefehler als bei bing.
xephos1one (2022-01-21 15:14:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)
Sadly you made some rookie mistakes in your changesets I want to address.
1. Please square buildings. This can be done by pressing "Q" or via the context menu.
2. Please don't delete and recreate ways to realign them like you did with many driveways. Just move the nodes of the existing ways.
3. Speaking of alignment: You can change the imagery via a menu on the right. As you are mapping in Virginia I'd recommend the state-provided "VBMP Most Recent Imagery". Sadly you used Bing and that is very outdated and has a bad quality and alignment.
4. Junctions don't get mapped like you did at Pioneer Drive/Main Street. OSM uses keys like turn:lanes for turning lanes. I'll fix it for you to know how it's done correctly.
Also read this to get started: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Please don't be afraid of mapping, OSM needs local mappers like you!
Ethannm (2022-01-21 15:36:41+00:00): Ok, thank you for the feedback! I'm new to this. I'll fix my errors and use other imagery tonight. Thank you again!
Ethannm (2022-01-21 21:25:38+00:00): Ok, I am about to start editing and fixing my mistakes. I am going to use the VA most recent imagery this time. I have a couple of questions if you don't mind.

1. What do you recommend me doing about the roads, that I aligned with the Bing imagery, but now are not aligned with the VA imagery? Should I just move the nodes?

2. Along with the roads, what do you do suggest with the driveways/parking lots/sidewalks that I added with the Bing imagery? Do I move the nodes and align them with the VA imagery?

3. What should I do with the houses/buildings that I added with the Bing imagery? There are about 5-8 nodes per house, so would it just be best for me to remove the house/building and reconstruct it and square it with the VA imagery instead of moving each and every node?

THANK YOU for pointing out my mistakes!!! I am enjoying mapping and I'm glad someone told me that I was doing some things wrong before I map more. I will do my best to correctly map for now on.