piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cserpell (2022-08-05 20:52:25+00:00): Estimado, gracias por los aportes.

Te cuento que en general en la comunidad agregamos las veredas separadas de la calle cuando están separadas por algo, una barrera, una hilera de árboles, un rectángulo de pasto/tierra, etc. Si no, en general es más fácil usar la etiqueta "sidewalk" que puedes revisar aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:sidewalk , que es más simple.

Si no lo has hecho, puedes unirte al canal de telegram de la comunidad: @OSMcl , eres bienvenido/a.

Saludos,
gordo anorexico (2022-08-05 21:34:45+00:00): 👍
aTarom (2022-08-04 05:59:37+00:00): Sembla que s'ha afegit un node sense voler a la part de l'edifici, he mogut la botiga una mica perquè no estigui just a sobre de la línia del building:part, no t'has carregat res :D, recorda't d'afegir el +## (+34...) inicial en el número de telèfon
Salutacions i gràcies per editar
tastrax (2022-08-10 07:58:42+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
David-McG (2022-08-08 05:48:27+00:00): Hello, it is quite important that this name is changed. The previous name is after a Catholic Bishop implicated in the cover up of child sexual abuse in this region. It needs to be changed to its current name - The Sisters of Mercy Lecture Theatre, as indiciated in the edit I made five days ago - as a matter of urgency.
nevw (2022-08-08 07:21:08+00:00): The database is updated immediately. The various maps using the data vary in how soon they update maps but the Standard layer on osm.org updates quite soon, often within minutes to a day or so. 
You may need to clear the cache in your browser to see the latest image or use Tor browser which is unlikely to be caching an old image.
I see the new name you added.
nevw (2022-08-08 07:24:27+00:00): Also the zoom levels are updated at different times so at some zoom levels the old image may show longer than others.
user_5359 (2023-04-11 06:32:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on your import. You add ways with foreign keys
desc='levelThreeRoad'
length=575.470056000000000 (we don't need any length information)
or nodes with
desc	'secondaryRoad'
height	0.000000000000000 (always 0 -> useless)
name	路
x_coord	111.509376433 (nodes have coordinates no need to repeat them)
y_coord	36.078191851

Please correct your change set.
user_5359 (2023-10-07 06:57:34+00:00): Author doesn't react . Source and license unclear, foreigen keys. The ways was reverted.
hanchao (2022-08-04 01:49:36+00:00): 在这里打广告并没有什么用
hanchao (2022-08-04 04:21:00+00:00): 添加的广告已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124460089#map=9/23.2500/113.5036
ovruni (2022-08-03 03:43:26+00:00): Hola Zahoory Marllory, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre se tiene que agregar solamente cuando un edificio tiene un nombre en particular, no para describir el objeto. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
hanchao (2022-08-04 04:21:11+00:00): 添加的广告已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124460089#map=9/23.2500/113.5036
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-17 12:06:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964994597/history - are you sure that it is actually surface=fine_gravel ?

Can " map of the Departamento de Planificación Vial of the year 2013. " be coped from to be used in OSM? Why you think so?
JLOSM (2023-10-21 03:54:56+00:00): When observing them in the aerial photography of each area, you place what is most similar, in this case you place fine_gravel, it would be best if Mapillary had it, but in this case, the area does not have one.
 As for the map of the "Department of Road Planning of the year 2013", at no time was it copied, it was only used for the "Ref" of the majority of roads, a data that coincided in all those in said country that already had it in their data.

The editor used in said area, https://mapwith.ai/rapid, does not even have the option to open files.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-21 10:34:23+00:00): Why you then claim that you copied data from "map of the Departamento de Planificación Vial of the year 2013" in edit description?
JLOSM (2023-10-22 22:28:42+00:00): No entiendo que es lo que quieres decir. Hábleme por favor en el idioma español, ya que al traducirlo veo afirmaciones de tu parte, que no corresponden con la realidad.

De hecho, más de un editor de Honduras me envio mensajes en esa época en que antiguamente realice ediciones en dicho pais, y en ninguno de esos, hubo alguna afirmación similar a la tuya.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-25 15:20:35+00:00): Sorry, I can't speak Spanish.

Your edit description has "according to the map of the Departamento de Planificación Vial of the year 2013. "

Then you claim "As for the map of the "Department of Road Planning of the year 2013", at no time was it copied" 

But then you claim " it was only used for the "Ref" of the majority of roads"

So ref tags were copied from that map, right?
Herman Lee (2022-08-04 00:21:37+00:00): 您好，火车站不是这种画法，希望您能够加群跟大家讨论一下https://t.me/osmchina或QQ群290278518，我会将此修改集退回，谢谢
Herman Lee (2022-08-04 00:21:59+00:00): 您好，火车站不是这种画法，希望您能够加群跟大家讨论一下https://t.me/osmchina
或QQ群290278518，我会将此修改集退回，谢谢
michaelIsADullGuy (2022-08-04 00:29:09+00:00): 好的，我尽量注意。
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 15:19:21+00:00): FYI:

* Beijing Station https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.90198/116.42212
* Railway mapping on OSMWiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways
trigpoint (2022-08-03 11:54:30+00:00): Why? 
This is clearly a track used by tractors to travel between fields.

Cheers Phil
Swihail (2022-08-05 12:47:18+00:00): Here again, I’ve made a mistake. I’m sorry for the inconvenience.
ovruni (2022-08-03 03:45:56+00:00): Hola LUIS_ENRIQUE0105, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "EDICION DE PARQUES Y AREA COMUNES DEL DISTRITO DE SANTA ANITA", sin embargo se han eliminado varios objetos sin motivo aparente, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tienes dudas sobre el mapeo en Perú, tenemos un canal de telegram donde puedes realizar consultas https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
Austrianton (2022-08-12 18:05:28+00:00): How did that change-set get to cover across large parts of Eurasia?
ftrebien (2022-08-12 20:47:25+00:00): I ran an Overpass Turbo query in JOSM to locate all the elements in the world that needed this correction, after checking on TagInfo that only a few elements would be affected.
ftrebien (2022-08-12 21:05:17+00:00): But if you use these powerful tools, be responsible. In this case, I caused the typo, as I made a small mistake while editing the wiki more than a year ago and this led local mappers to propagate it to the data, so it was ok to just fix it right away. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Austrianton (2022-08-12 21:48:52+00:00): Cool to know, where that came from. I knew there was a good reason.

But rest assured, the danger of me using these powerful tools is negligible, as I keep only to places I know well and only really update the map in two small areas in Austria. Interesting to see how fast a small mistake can propagate though.
Allison P (2022-08-09 03:21:10+00:00): addr:state is for postal abbreviations. Use ID over Idaho. Thanks!
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
marczoutendijk (2022-08-03 09:12:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6187

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
ovruni (2022-08-03 04:06:01+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta de edificio se encuentra destinado para edificios individuales, no para áreas que contienen edificios.
Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 16:02:30+00:00): 
    Hello!

    Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

    But is PFM:garmin_type=0x2f01 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083096338/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated

(if there is more than one surviving tag like that from your edits: do you prefer separate message for each, list of all at once or something in between?)
adiatmad (2024-06-24 06:47:32+00:00): Hello, I apologize for my delayed response. Somehow, I missed your message. I thought I copied and pasted from this node and forgot to remove the odd tag. But it is sorted now. Thanks for reaching out!
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/494074910)
Sandal man (2022-08-07 12:01:35+00:00): Hola, gracias por los cambios en el OSM, pero ahora se ha dibujado Highway=residencial encima de Highway=peatonal.
Y no más "área".
Eso no me parece correcto.

Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2022-08-07 12:04:19+00:00): Se trata de este ajuste
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300679666
AgusQui (2022-08-17 22:55:15+00:00): Todas estas calles que agregaste en esta zona no existen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083405172#map=16/-34.5971/-58.7556 estás desactualizando la base de datos por mapear zonas que no conoces desde el sillón de tu casa, las imágenes están desactualizadas, si no conoces la zona no mapees, dirige tu atención a tu barrio y deja que los locales nos encarguemos. Además porque service=alley? Sabes que significa eso? Leiste la wiki, no tiene nada que ver con lo que estaba allí. También habilitaste un paso a nivel que ya no existe, agregas noexit=yes sin estar realmente seguro que no hay salida alguna (peatonal por ejemplo), o agregas living_street en vías de servicio. Me gustaría saber que tomas de referencia al alinear calles, espero no sea solamente la imagen satelital.
literan (2022-08-03 17:19:04+00:00): непонятно, зачем вы съезд со МКАД сломали. Отменю правку
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-24 07:02:33+00:00): Hello
You have registered this business or shop with the wrong tag. You have two weeks to correct it.
ChehrehBargi (2024-05-09 06:38:47+00:00): Two weeks ago, a note was sent to you to correct the wrong tags for this doctor's building. It will be deleted due to non-response.
Nastaran_Sabouri (2024-07-14 12:05:08+00:00): It was wrong
Thank you for correcting
SudershonSanyal (2022-08-03 06:13:07+00:00): True. Thanks for the information.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:10:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9928790868/history has surface = steel that was added in this edit
Maybe surface=metal material=steel would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmetal
user_2066394 (2022-08-03 14:54:14+00:00): Die Stiftung alternativ als Knoten erfassen?
cedro (2022-08-03 17:09:19+00:00): Die Stiftung ist nicht mehr im Gebäude. Die Nutzung hat sich geändert.
literan (2022-08-03 17:20:52+00:00): и тут весь МКАД переломали. Все правки под откат. Пожалуйста, если вы не понимаете, что делаете, не вносите правки.
Stranger_I (2022-08-03 12:24:54+00:00): А чего это улица 60 лет октября стала называться "кафе сказка"?? Пересечение дегтярёва и 60 лет октября
Richard (2022-08-04 09:29:28+00:00): You have changed a bridleway (implies foot, horse and bicycle access rights) to a track (does not imply access rights). This will break foot, horse and bike routing. Please revert this change.
Swihail (2022-08-05 12:48:39+00:00): Again, thank you. I am looking forward to improving.
gurglypipe (2022-08-05 14:36:05+00:00): Hi Richard, I’m not sure what you say is actually true: the way here has explicit foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=no tagging. So the tagging defaults from highway=bridleway or highway=track are already being overridden.
Intrinsical (2022-08-03 21:26:37+00:00): I didn't actually change the landuse. oops!
Eifelkobold! (2022-08-03 11:46:55+00:00): Hallo WoodB,

du wurdest in der Vergangenheit mehrfach dazu aufgefordert, aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Kommentare zu verwenden und Löschungen richtiger Daten zu unterlassen. Leider hast du bisher nicht darauf reagiert und auch Nachfragen nicht beantwortet. Daher ein letzter Versuch: Warum hast du die Wege hier ohne vorherige Diskussion, Nachfragen und Begründung gelöscht

Diese existieren vor Ort, ich habe sie erst vor kurzem vor Ort erfasst und eingetragen. Wir machen uns diese Arbeit nicht, damit andere sie einfach wieder löschen. Das ist Vandalismus.

Ich habe deine Änderungen daher in Änderungssatz 124433091 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124433091) zurückgesetzt.

Eifelkobold
user_11609320 (2022-08-03 07:15:46+00:00): the warehouse i added on 3rd street is on tribal land
parsd51 (2022-08-03 11:12:00+00:00): start_date er 2019-09-30 som angivet i version history og ikke 2019.
ToniE (2022-08-03 08:02:38+00:00): Servus Anne

und willkommen bei OSM.

Für Wochenmärkte gibt es ein eigenes "tag". Und opening_hours hat eine spezielles (english-sprachiges) Format

Vergleiche

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1209070868

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Es gibt östlich von hier im Gebäude schon einen "Bauermarkt Schwabmühcnen". Ist der Wochenmarkt nun doppelt gemapped?

Viele Grüße
Toni
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-20 10:25:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9928882901/history has shop = Express Facials that was added in this edit
shop=Express Facials ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
oba510 (2022-08-04 09:22:22+00:00): Hi,  please don't delete the service=driveway tag from driveways.  Thank you.
silakshm (2022-11-01 07:35:29+00:00): Hi, 

I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies, for incorrect road modification and highway tag. 

This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again. 
Thank you once again for providing the feedback, I'm looking forward to learn more from you. 

Regards,
silakshm
MxxCon (2022-08-05 02:26:05+00:00): Hello.
The way you updated n9403340351 looks incorrect. This business looks like "Next Level Fasions", and not "Next" with location name of "Level Fasions".

Additionally, regarding w250372535, tagging opening_hours=closed is not a correct way to indicate that a business is closed. Best way to do is to use lifecycle prefixes as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at least just delete business-specific info from it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124421943
Dogman15 (2022-08-05 03:13:20+00:00): Okay. Go ahead and make those changes. I don't live in New York, so you do what you think is best.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 03:25:34+00:00): It's not about living in NY, it's about following the guidelines of OSM and noticing when iD's template warnings are incorrect. 🙂
RicoElectrico (2022-08-03 13:16:35+00:00): Dziękuję za aktualizację mapy. W temacie ratownictwa, będę wdzięczny za naniesienie na mapę defibrylatorów AED, jeśli w gminie istnieją - mamy do tego stronę https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl .
ikonor (2022-08-08 15:53:48+00:00): Hi, I came accross "tracktype=grade3-5" and wondered where that value comes from [1].

Is "grade3-5" documented or recommended anywhere or are you using it because it's suggested by the iD editor?

[1] https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/pull/458#issuecomment-1207211472
Supaplex (2022-08-03 10:11:28+00:00): 大龍泵一帶
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124422289
ToniE (2022-08-03 08:10:45+00:00): Hallo Anne,

du hast nun einen zweiten Weg "Jahnstraße (Fahrradstraße)" über die "Jahnstraße" drüber gelegt.

Das ist nicht korrekt, denn die existierende "Jahnstraße" hat nur "neue Schilder bekommen".

Bitte lösche die neue "Jahnstraße (Fahrradstraße)" wieder und verändere die "tags" an der alten Jahnstraße in die Richtung wie bei der Fiedenstaße hier bei mir in Ottobrunn: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5004920 ist auch Fahrradstraße.

N.B.: " (Fahrradstraße)" ist kein zulässiger Bestandteil von 'name', dafür gibt es ja die "tags" 'bicycle_road' und so weiter.

VG
Toni
AnneGru (2022-08-03 10:27:19+00:00): Hallo Toni!

Dankeschön für die Aufklärung! Objekt wurde wieder gelöscht und ich werde mir die Tags nochmal genauer anschauen!

Liebe Grüße
Frans S (2022-09-03 11:31:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.


I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124422404
Eifelkobold! (2022-08-03 11:44:09+00:00): Hallo WoodB,

du wurdest in der Vergangenheit mehrfach dazu aufgefordert, aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Kommentare zu verwenden und Löschungen richtiger Daten zu unterlassen. Leider hast du bisher nicht darauf reagiert und auch Nachfragen nicht beantwortet. Daher ein letzter Versuch: Warum hast du die Wege hier ohne vorherige Diskussion, Nachfragen und Begründung gelöscht

Diese existieren vor Ort, ich habe sie erst vor kurzem vor Ort erfasst und eingetragen. Wir machen uns diese Arbeit nicht, damit andere sie einfach wieder löschen. Das ist Vandalismus.

Ich habe deine Änderungen daher in Änderungssatz 124432908 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124432908) zurückgesetzt.

Eifelkobold
TheNet1996 (2022-08-03 09:16:17+00:00): Servus AnneGru,

Willkommen bei OSM!
Eine Bitte: wenn ein Laden umzieht, dann lösche ihn bitte nicht an der alten Stelle und erstelle an der neuen Adresse ein neues Objekt - sondern verschiebe einfach den bestehenden Laden an die neue Adresse und ändere die Daten (z.B. neue Anschrift) entsprechend ab.

Danke & Grüße aus Augsburg
Mike
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 10:19:09+00:00): Moin zusammen und entschuldigt bitte, dass ich so "hereinschneie":

Zustimmung für nicht löschen (sondern per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix taggen), keine Zustimmung für Verschieben, da wir ja die Historie eines POI-Nodes erhalten wollen, und das funktioniert nicht, wenn er (im schlimmsten Fall) um den halben Globus geschoben wird.

Grüße aus dem Norden!