piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 20:08:45+00:00): Hello!

Have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_rental here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9008784347/history
giggling-walk (2023-03-20 00:55:14+00:00): oh yeah, quite likely. basically, it's the place in town where you can rent a car...
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 07:15:46+00:00): So you rent car in a hotel, right?
giggling-walk (2023-03-20 14:59:22+00:00): yeah, it's kind of an informal thing. it's a "hotel" in the sense that the owner rents room, maybe a little more little more like an inn or a motel, but that's besides the point: she also rents cars, and it's one of the only place on all of haida gwai where you can *do* that at all. but it's not like she's got a garage with inspections and everything, it's pretty informal...
IgorEliezer (2021-08-22 19:48:32+00:00): Olá,
O mapa que você deve ter usado é uma aproximação com alto grau de simplificação das divisas do município. Se for do IBGE (como mostra a fonte) ele não é o órgão oficial que que define divisas. O que define as divisas é a Lei Estadual do Quadro Territorial (https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei/1963/lei-8050-31.12.1963.html) que diz que a divisa segue pelo ribeirão Batistada, pelo divisor das águas e pelo ribeirão Piracicaba-Mirim. Você pode conferir isso neste mapa do IPPLAP – Instituto de Pesquisas e Planejamento de Piracicaba
https://ipplap.com.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/MAPA-DA-DIVISAO-DOS-DISTRITOS.pdf (vindo daqui https://ipplap.com.br/site/mapas/), também pode ver https://datageo.ambiente.sp.gov.br/app/?ctx=IGC, e em Bases IGC, carregar IGC - Cartas Topográficas 1:10.000.
O que o IBGE e outros órgãos de geografia fazem (como o IGC) é interpretar a lei no mapa. Podem até auxiliar no estudo das divisas, mas o que estabelece as divisas são leis estaduais e municipais.
Att.
Igor
tszym (2021-08-18 17:51:25+00:00): Hi, this is another changeset that seems to over-complicate the intersection instead of tagging turn lanes.
Also, this is messing with administrative boundaries by tagging a new segment as boundary and moving a way that is part of the relation that represents the admin boundary.
Could you please consider restoring ways/boundary position and use turn:lanes tags instead?
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109718563
jeslop (2021-08-16 14:12:20+00:00): Hola Gelino. OSM refleja la realidad, no la que a cada uno le gustaría. Ese cambio ya ha sido revertido por otro usuario, te agradecería que no hicieses ese tipo de cambios en el futuro. Gracias por colaborar con OSM.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Supaplex (2021-08-16 05:37:15+00:00): 這應該不是真的國家吧，如果是幻想的事物並不適合放在 OpenStreetMap 上面。
OpenStreetMap 是公眾參與的網路共編地圖，地圖資料會被不少公司如 Facebook、Mapbox 、Niantic 運用，是影響相當大的地圖計劃，不適合放沒有經過驗證的資料。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109718850
Lachgast (2024-08-19 21:59:57+00:00): Hi Ossian Lore,

Read your remark at the footway in construction at the claypit. We mistakenly thought to go over but found the path still not to be finished. I'm about to remove the footway-in-construction based on my 08-2024 survey (no work terrain or access to the islet) and someone elses remark (from 2022) that with the completion of the claypit natural reserve the footpath may indeed be cancelled. I'm including a link to this element in the changeset comments. If you have any other information, just let me know.

Cheerio!
Lachgast (2024-08-19 22:00:23+00:00): I meant: read someone else's remark [...]
Ossian Lore (2024-08-29 15:55:36+00:00): Hi Lachgast, thanks for the update. This basin moorings project appears to have been a non-starter so you're right to remove the path. Thanks for updating this :) All the best
MxxCon (2021-08-16 03:25:29+00:00): Did UN and US officially recognize the "new" country?🤨
Just because a bunch of thugs with guns declare something, doesn't mean that's the new fact...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109719499
Minh Nguyen (2021-08-16 03:36:09+00:00): Please follow the links to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q108111555 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30747910 . This change merely clarifies that, whatever happened in Afghanistan today, the flags in Washington and New York represent the internationally recognized government.
Minh Nguyen (2021-08-16 03:52:53+00:00): I belatedly realized the flagpole in Washington is on private property. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109721756 adds the flagpole in front of the embassy (still presumably flying the U.S.-recognized flag, designed in 2013).
SomeoneElse (2021-08-24 21:52:44+00:00): Hello AndreiTiong,
Something has gone very wrong here.  If I run the JOSM validator on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973372977/history , I see that there are 27 overlapping buildings in the same location.  Do you have any idea how this might have happened?
Best Regards,
Andy
julcnx (2021-08-16 06:54:54+00:00): source=GPS would be better because the GPX tracks is visible in layers (OpenStreetMap GPS traces) and survey is too general as it could be based on imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109720097
az09 (2021-08-23 09:34:49+00:00): так и не понял где building, один только arts_centre остался. рендерится почти никак, на других стлях вообще никаких следов не осталось.
Alexey Sirotkin (2021-08-23 14:47:24+00:00): Не пойму где факап случился, все по старой схеме делал вроде :)
frodrigo (2021-08-24 21:32:33+00:00): Please stop contributing like this. Your are sending very crapy data.
Review guide how to contribute.
Frans S (2021-08-16 12:24:56+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please square each rectangular building after mapping it with the Q key.
Best regards
Paul_012 (2021-09-14 01:38:06+00:00): Hi. The addition of barrier=city_wall to the entire street was not the correct way to address this. If you want to add a barrier tag, place it on a node where the barrier is, and use a more appropriate tag such as barrier=block. In this case, though, the entire street is being redeveloped, so it should just have been deleted and the area tagged as landuse=construction.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 07:32:53+00:00): please do correct imagery alignment before doing any pther alignment. Imagery needs to be aligned to data first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109722889
WingardiumMapiosa (2022-12-08 19:56:24+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, ArchesPark is no longer with the team, but I see that you have realigned the features here. One suggestion that would be helpful to others is to cite the imagery and the offset you are using as it can be confusing to others when they look at imagery that doesn’t match the data. Thank you for the feedback here, happy mapping!
kevinchen1 (2021-08-21 03:09:32+00:00): Great Highway was previously tagged as highway=primary as recently as 1y ago, before it was changed to cycleway. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87757002 

Should we change it back to primary?
ChrisMD123 (2021-08-21 16:56:28+00:00): Sure, thanks for checking! I was just going off of the classification for other nearby roads of similar importance, like 19th Avenue.
kevinchen1 (2021-08-22 06:09:41+00:00): Great, this is done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110048465
Dimacn (2021-08-16 04:59:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста выравнивайте углы зданий с помощью команды редактора "Выпрямить углы" (выпадающее меню) или кнопкой Q. Речь идёт по здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973400997 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973400996
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 07:40:40+00:00): please align imagery first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109723476
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 05:23:18+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
JeroenHoek (2021-08-16 06:36:56+00:00): Tip: for these kind of global edits it helps if you use a title like this:

"Fix tag value typo: payment:debit_card → payment:debit_cards"

That makes it clear that you are performing a common sense maintenance task. In these cases you can helpfully add this link as the source for your changeset:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
SekeRob (2021-08-16 07:12:42+00:00): Actually payment:debit_cards is as invalid / imprecise a payment method tag as payment:debit_cards. Should not be used at all. payment:maestro would be a valid one, but globally it varies by country like here payment:bancomat=yes would be a correct debit card key. Same goes for payment:credit_cards, imprecise and flagged.

But anyway, thanks for yet 3 or more global edit I had no desire at all to see in my local edit history list.
Zaneo (2021-08-17 06:22:30+00:00): Blame the changeset viewing representation not the edit.

Global edits need to happen sometimes, and it a ridiculous request to split them up into arbitrary units to make people who hate big boxes happy.

File a issue with whatever software you use's github asking them to allow you to hide global edits if you don't want to see them.

Regarding the actual tag. Payments:debit_card, is more precise than nothing. It means that they at least accept some debit cards. Without that tag you could assume that no debit cards are supported. One could conjecture that local debit cards could be used if they saw a "yes" flag.

Does payment:coins need to say "No 10 cent coins allowed" to be useful, no. It would be great, but it's not the bar for adding information.
JeroenHoek (2021-08-17 07:11:12+00:00): Having the option to ignore changesets with bounding boxes that fall outside of the area I'm viewing would be very helpful. People shouldn't map a pub in London and a parking garage in Shanghai in the same changeset, but for these janitorial edits with a limited number of entities worldwide it makes perfect sense to do it in one changeset, because it also gives people the opportunity to address any concerns about it in one place.

Could you post a link to the issue if you open one SekeRob?

I can't imagine this wouldn't have been reported before though.
SekeRob (2021-08-17 07:49:48+00:00): Global janitorial should be used judiciously. I bet data consumers know rather well about standard deviations in tagging so whether debit_card or debit_cards, credit_card or credit_cards or creditcards, they'll be captured properly in the correct slot, tomorrow there will be a debit_card again. Case in point, I looked at a drop down list for a certainly available value and there were 3 variations, still with iD Editor's 2.20.0 NSI's fed drop down lists, a ladi-dah, a ladi_dah and a ladidah, only to learn from taginfo which is the commonly used.
Blame?.. my double ristretto has not kicked in yet, global mappers are aware, the opening salvo comment with each in the series shows awareness it reaches into most every mappers history view and as said, data consumers, who's maps is what the end user looks at, know too about the value variations.

Just a consideration when going global 'error' netting.
Zaneo (2021-08-18 00:08:18+00:00): Hey SekeRob,

Sorry that I came off confrontational. I have been dealing with a lot of mailing list people who are "no global edits" ever kind of people which really rubs me the wrong way. Not an excuse but a frame of reference.

I agree with you that global edits should be carefully considered. I think we shouldn't be so scared of them... but that doesn't mean we should forgo caution as you highlight. If they are annoying to rollback, then we should improve our rollback software.

Also as you say we need to attack these kind of edits from two places. One from the dataset side, and one from the generation side. "Why is ID still recommending these tags".

Additionally, you raise an excellent point that we should get consumers in on the loop. If we could focus our effort on items which are annoying for data consumers that could help. Although to be honest for a new data consumer, the less variation we have the less the initial hurdle.

In summary, I think we don't actually have such differing opinions, and I apologize again for coming off in an accusatory manner.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 05:23:23+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
julcnx (2021-08-16 06:46:18+00:00): Please refrain from doing large geographical changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109724961
julcnx (2021-08-16 06:45:02+00:00): Invalid landuse tag, I believe tourism=hotel should be sufficient, no?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725141
julcnx (2021-08-16 06:43:05+00:00): you should use a landuse tag for this area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725166
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 05:23:30+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 05:35:39+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
Jakob48 (2021-08-18 18:34:41+00:00): hello  快乐的老鼠宝宝
Please opening a discussion befor you doing this automatic edit in a great bbox.

Do you know???
Regards
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-25 02:49:04+00:00): Why not ask wheelmap.org not do this? It bother everyone automatically everyday.
SK53 (2021-08-22 12:43:10+00:00): Hi,

I guess you  were on our IRC channel yesterday asking about why your business appears in the wrong city. To help a bit I've added some extra info, changed the retail area to a retail store & added it as an interior decoration business. I've also added parking access, website & partial address (i.e., without zip code & house number). Do feel free to correct any of this if it is inaccurate.

The zip code locations are probably based on the central location of the zip which will be in Weslaco and this may affect which city is returned.

One thing I notice is that you refer to the road as S International Blvd, but we have Bill Summers International Blvd. If these are alternate names we can fix it.

Best wishes,

Jerry aka SK53
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 05:44:09+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 08:17:40+00:00): align imagery first please
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109727582
WingardiumMapiosa (2022-12-08 19:55:42+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, PastraMT is no longer with the team, but I see that you have realigned the features here. Thank you for the feedback, happy mapping!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 06:18:10+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
dx125 (2021-08-17 16:12:12+00:00): Hi,

I read about the Mapbox Edits in the German OSM forum. 
You work here with ID and Esri World Imagery.
To make your work easier and to make it precise and up-to-date:
In the German state of Brandenburg, you can legally use this background:

https://isk.geobasis-bb.de/ows/dop20c_wms?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=bebb_dop20c&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:3857&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}

You have to enter the URL manually in the editor ID for custom backgrounds.
The image data takes a while to load, it's almost HD ;-)

regards
dx125
DianaDemchuk (2021-08-18 06:55:44+00:00): Hey! Thank you very much for trying to facilitate and improve our mapping algorithm, but we can only use the official sources built into the OSM.
dx125 (2021-08-18 07:17:54+00:00): It's official and it's included in the professional editor JOSM too! It's a shame that you have to work with ID. I've just uploaded a set of changes, created in ID with my background image.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109853107
It works without problems and, as I said, is also official, but ID does not have it in the standard, you have to add it manually.
DianaDemchuk (2021-08-21 10:11:04+00:00): Thanks a lot for the source, the pictures are really great! But in this area where these images are valid, we have already finished mapping.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-09-05 09:11:39+00:00): ربما كان أنسب وسم للخبراء هذا الوسم:
natural=wetland
وقد قمت بتغييره لهذا الوسم
انظر وصف الوسم للمزيد:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland

وللمزيد عن وسوم الأشياء الطبيعية:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ar:%D9%85%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AD:%D8%B7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%8A
SGorskiy (2021-08-16 07:19:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Если вы меняете точку станции на остановку, то необходимо так же создать саму станцию.
Прошу вернуть в метро обратно как было или создать саму станцию. С платформами и т.п. 
Задать вопросы и получить консультацию можно в телеграмм чате русскоязычного ОСМ сообщества: https://t.me/ruosm
SGorskiy (2021-08-16 09:09:08+00:00): Хотя мне сейчас сообщили, что на рельсах станции быть не может, должен быть стоп.
kartler175 (2021-08-16 12:45:37+00:00): Die von dir erstellten Relationen https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.64498&lat=48.41122&zoom=17&opacity=0.9 sind keine Multipolygone. Multipolygone dienen der Definition von Flächenobjekten und bestehen ausschließlich  aus geschlossenen Linienzügen mit den Rollen "inner" und "outer". Sie sind keine Sammelrelationen von beliebigen Objekten mit frei erfundenen Rollen.
muchichka_s (2021-08-18 01:37:57+00:00): Привіт, чому без зрозумілого пояснення видалена дорога в лісі?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109730003
kapitansup (2021-08-18 04:58:42+00:00): цієї дороги не існує
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109730003
muchichka_s (2021-08-18 09:03:49+00:00): Ви це перевіряли якось? Часто лісові стежки не помітні на супутникових зображеннях. Користувач, який її додавав займається походами і додав її за особистими треками 8 місяців тому. Сумнівно, що за цей час її розмило
btwhite92 (2021-10-06 15:23:21+00:00): Hello,
This section of highway has direct access to adjacent properties which means that it is not a freeway/motorway. I'll be correcting it back down to 'trunk', just a heads up.
Bradley
ashybko_lyft (2021-10-07 08:55:57+00:00): Hi, Bradley

My name is Anna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for paying attention to this and fixing the mentioned highway. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience my edits have caused. My team and I will definitely follow OSM policies for highway classes and avoid such changes in the future. Thank you for your contribution to the OSM!

Regards,
Anna
limmmoh (2021-08-16 07:12:46+00:00): Driver Feedback
mueschel (2021-08-23 09:06:47+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

What does the tag 'generation' mean? Is this in total, per year, per day?
user_11418917 (2021-08-16 07:21:14+00:00): Stop adding spam!
Mordechai23 (2021-08-17 13:02:23+00:00): Cześć, wysyłaj proszę tytuły opisujące twoje edycje, a nie losowe znaki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 07:56:34+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
aharvey (2021-08-20 13:23:27+00:00): I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2812838 because from memory when I added the steps they stopped at the playground and didn't connect to the other path.
aharvey (2021-08-20 13:25:43+00:00): PS. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5123393949 I fixed up the tagging for a crossing island.
Tom Brennan (2021-08-21 02:15:08+00:00): Cool re crossing island. iD was complaining, so I was just trying to resolve the complaint! Poorly...
SafetyIng (2021-08-16 19:29:36+00:00): Hey, The location of the road is not correct. Also on Bing, on Esri and on LVermGeo (official authority) images the street is now threw a building.
DianaDemchuk (2021-08-17 06:46:58+00:00): Hey! when plotting this road on the map, not only images were used, but also the Mapillary of 2019, where it is clearly visible that there is a check-in to the parking lot! Please fix this if this change is no longer valid!
SafetyIng (2021-08-17 09:14:45+00:00): "only images were used, but also the Mapillary of 2019," that is false. On your Changeset there is the entry, that "Bing aerial imagery" was used. And on the Bing image there are a building!
Mapbox should urgently rethink its quality management.
DianaDemchuk (2021-09-16 17:02:26+00:00): Will definitely reconsider.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 07:56:39+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
SekeRob (2021-08-16 08:02:33+00:00): Maybe you should have waited on a response on your first global edit to include that one was replacing 1 invalid/imprecise tag with another. Neither payment:debit_cards or credit_cards is proper.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 08:15:05+00:00): Hey bro, I noticed your comment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109724670

You said that  all of them is unproper, is because https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:payment said that it is a generic key, and said that you'd better use a more specific tag to describe.

But the fact is that some of them will nolonger be updated with a specific tag, and what I do is fix the typo error to a wiki recorded generic key.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment#Generic_Keys)

If possible, we all hope that it will be replaced by a more proper tag.

But "payment:debit_card" is not a correct spelling, "payment:debit_cards" is, although it still unproper.

One is wrong and hard to programming found, another is recorded, so we should choose the more helpful way.

Thank you for watching all my recent changesets!
JeroenHoek (2021-08-16 08:41:52+00:00): I agree with you 快乐的老鼠宝宝. While payment:debit_cards may be vague; it is a valid tag. The one you replaced is simply a misspelling.

Thanks!
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-08-16 09:09:40+00:00): Moin didimosi,
kannst Du bitte auch die Quelle für die Adressen angeben, die Du eingetragen hast.
Danke und Gruß
Roger Wilco
PT-53 (2021-08-22 06:53:29+00:00): Hallo mamue,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. an diesem Straßenabschnitt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131757075/history
das Merkmal 
highway=construction 
abgeändert in 
highway=primary_link

Straßensperrungen wegen längerfristigen Baustellen werden in OSM mit der Merkmal-Kombination 
highway=construction + 
construction=z.B. residential 
markiert.
Wenn die Straße fertiggestellt und für den Verkehr freigegen ist, reicht es nicht aus, daß Merkmal 
highway=construction auf 
highway=primary_link abzuändern. Es muß dann auch noch das Merkmal 
construction=residential 
gelöscht werden. Ansonsten funktioniert das Routing bei manchen Navis dort nicht.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an? 

Gefunden mit OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=8.63805&lat=48.14189&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Grüße
Futur3r (2021-08-16 10:01:22+00:00): Salut,

la donnée viens de Route 500 et la voie de contournement n’empêche pas qu'il y a toujours un fort trafic sur ces axes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109734339
Futur3r (2021-08-16 10:03:48+00:00): Et la Route d'Annecy qui traverse le centre est loin d'être une voie tertiaire.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109734339
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-08-16 10:18:28+00:00): Même avec les aménagements fait exprès pour faire fuir le trafic de transit  de ce tronçon ?