piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-03-08 15:46:37+00:00): Hi,

This bare rock zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4058725 has an unclosed state at the top stopping rendering and 40x2 even close vertices, as if a line was pasted on or imported over the outline. I fixed the open ring, but then reversed as I don't know the why of these close node vertices making it impossible for me to save the edit and 'ignore' I will absolute not touch You already fixed 87 of them so I guess you know what's on.

ciao
astraspera (2022-03-09 18:03:50+00:00): Hi,
Id editor marked me many issues as "very close nodes" in the perimeter of the bare rock, so I tried to fix them. The bare rock outline is extremely dense in nodes, I deleted some of theme (I think they are a ridicoulous amount in order to define the questionable edge between rock and scree...).
I hope not to have create other issues, in this case I apologize.
Thank you.
SekeRob (2022-03-09 18:37:38+00:00): Hi, I'm reasobly sure those are either automaten trace, import or someone who likes mapping in max zoom. Ridiculous is the word. Rendermachines take care of roundness. One does not need 50 nodes on a roundabout, 28-32 suffice. It's great for scoring rank as the number of nodes create is the measure. The window on Inspector closes at 8am and 8 PM. If you closed the ring the bare rock issue will no longer show at 22:30, rendering will be within minutes.

Ciao
SekeRob (2022-03-10 12:51:27+00:00): Hi again.

Since the bare rock was shown open this morning I've attacked the issues

1) Removed half dozen double mapped and high density node outlines, merged many close nodes.
2) Resolved an issue on large scree which had a dead end SE.
3) looked at the large scree MP. There's a substantial area SW that's very green in newest of all ESRI (not clarity which is OLD). No color distortion/aritfact from shading as it shows fresh white scree in it (not snow.)
Doublessly I'll get the bill presented tomorrow as I'm sure to not have caught all the hiding issues. Most important, momentarily not getting any 'ring not closed' warnings.

The high density lines seem to be 7 years old, time to clean them up. 

ciao.
praeteritum (2022-06-23 06:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122739173.
praeteritum (2023-05-13 04:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136040364.
praeteritum (2022-06-22 03:55:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122690028.
Dodko (2022-03-05 10:42:53+00:00): Je tam nejaký obchod/prevádzka, alebo čo presne ste tou zmenou chceli dosiahnuť?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-04 20:03:48+00:00): co zmieniłeś w tym zestawie?
Talopyo (2022-03-05 05:46:15+00:00): dodałem parkingi przy ulicy francuskiej, raymonta, jagiellońskiej (street_side)
Mordechai23 (2022-03-05 08:48:33+00:00): okej, bardzo bym prosił żebyś opisywał takie rzeczy w nazwie zestawu zmian, to bardzo ułatwia życie innym edytorom ;)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
mavl (2022-03-05 02:32:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
praeteritum (2022-06-21 04:18:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122645227.
philippec (2022-03-04 21:05:44+00:00): Kalkendorp aed
4.173 meter van de muur, dat zou kunnen.
philippec (2022-03-05 20:12:00+00:00): Ik zou het muurtje bijgetekend hebben.
Syl (2022-03-05 14:30:11+00:00): Bonjour, à quoi correspond votre source "carte officielle" ?
ailaire (2022-03-05 18:00:40+00:00): Carte topo IGN
Syl (2022-03-05 18:07:21+00:00): On ne peut pas utiliser les cartes IGN comme sources pour des raisons de droit, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:FAQ#Pourquoi_n.27utilisez_vous_pas_Google_Maps_ou_untel_pour_vos_donn.C3.A9es_.3F
Par contre on a accès à pas mal des données de l'IGN comme la BD Topo IGN qui est disponible dans JOSM sous forme de calque.
Pour vos prochaines modifications pouvez-vous être plus précis sur le nom de la source ?
Cordialement.
ailaire (2022-03-05 18:27:54+00:00): La source de l'information n'est pas l'IGN mais la personne qui a émis la note. 
J'ai précisé que la proposition de nommage et l'IGN sont cohérents. C'est un gage de fiabilité de l'information.
L'IGN ne détient pas de propriété intellectuelle sur le nom de la colline. L'IGN n'est pas l'entité qui détermine le nom de cette colline. Au contraire, ce sont les habitants de cette région qui ont donné un nom à cette colline, et en ont informé l'IGN.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2022-03-05 07:16:59+00:00): 
Hi Aleg.  I added junction=roundabout....
 
Hint https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-03-05 08:57:23+00:00): removed oneway=yes..
Aleg Surta (2022-03-21 09:15:40+00:00): Hello, eggie! 

Sorry for the long response. 
Thank you for this fix, according to Wiki OSM. 

Regards 
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118105429
NightH (2022-03-05 07:52:11+00:00): Köszi a touching ring javítását a 1036968401 vonalnál.

Tegnap vettem észre a hibámat, mára pedig meg is oldottad.
Tompika (2022-03-06 19:54:33+00:00): Nagyon szívesen.
Mindenki hibázhat de csak kevesen köszönik meg a javítást.
Üdv.
Filip009 (2022-05-22 19:57:20+00:00): Prosím, pokiaľ ešte komunikujete s BBSK, napíšte im prosím nech si opravia polohu zastávky https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9554828212 sem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268366930
t_ja (2022-05-24 18:09:27+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie, informáciu im odovzdám spolu s ďalšími nepresnosťami, ktoré som našiel.
Pri pridávaní nových zastávok vždy kontrolujem blízke okolie (podľa pozície od BBSK!, ale hľadať zastávku cca 2km inde mi ani nenapadlo. Po dokončení ešte prejdem zastávky, ktoré máme v OSM a neboli v zozname od BBSK a tiež im ich pošlem na vyjadrenie.

Mimochodom, táto konkrétna zastávka s veľkou pravdepodobnosťou už neexistuje, lebo nemá ani stĺpik, ani tabuľu s odchodmi spojov a tiež takú zastávku nie je možné nájsť ani na CP . sk ...
Filip009 (2022-05-24 19:47:34+00:00): Asi je možné, že ju zrušili
praeteritum (2022-06-21 04:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122644948.
praeteritum (2022-06-21 04:03:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122644933.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-04 23:32:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
praeteritum (2022-06-21 03:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122644713.
lyctkel (2022-06-28 15:07:08+00:00): Hi captain_slow,
did you mean building=roof at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966257343?
Regards,
lyctkel
captain_slow (2022-06-28 15:13:02+00:00): Yes I did, thank you very much for spotting this error and pointing it out to me. I corrected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122962481
confusedbuffalo (2022-03-18 17:43:42+00:00): I'm not sure how you managed it, but in this and another changeset you had a non-printing character between the sections of the postcodes for a couple of places (S36 7JW and S36 7JY)
I've fixed them, but something to watch out for in future
Paul Berry (2022-03-20 19:59:46+00:00): Thanks for spotting this. I've managed to track down the source so I'll be sure to sanitise for non-breaking spaces from now on.
user_5359 (2022-03-07 10:41:55+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/relation/2956292/history. What ist the meaning of the tags
adr_less=13-21-2-07-45 - -
id_ob=276
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-08 09:25:21+00:00): What is the source for your edits?
joshuatruemotion (2022-03-08 21:17:27+00:00): Cross reference with Waze and Google maps. Other times I have customers of mine send me pictures from the street.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-23 07:15:43+00:00): Please, never ever edit based on Google Maps.

Both for quality and legal reasons.

(likely the same applies to Waze - in general never copy from other map unless you are familiar with licensing and checked with other mappers)
Mister Kanister (2022-03-21 18:59:41+00:00): Hallo, nur weil ich es zufällig gesehen habe eine kleine Anmerkung: Es ist i.d.R. besser, landuse=*-Polygone nicht direkt mit z.B. Strassen-ways zu "verkleben", um die spätere Bearbeitung der ways zu erleichtern –  vgl. z.B. die Diskussionen hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=851389#p851389

Weiterhin frohes Mappen :)
user_5359 (2022-03-05 19:02:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/13878994. Did you mean operator:ref insteaf of operator:trips?
Amegaz (2022-03-06 09:27:13+00:00): Hello!

No this is not a mistake. If you have a look at the master route, you will see that this route relates to 24 other routes. To distinct them the operator tags them with a "Fahrtnummer" which I translated to trip, as fahrtnummer was considered to be problematic for non Germany speaking users. As some routes are used for more then one time the name must be plural. The trips are separated by ;

Best regards
Amegaz
praeteritum (2022-06-20 01:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122597452.
kartonage (2022-03-06 13:17:57+00:00): Hej,

in this area you have accidentally changed residential highways to buildings. I suggest to keep out for error warnings in JOSM and on what tags you add.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118108297&zoom=15&lat=6.4544&lon=3.3394

Thanks
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-04 21:39:54+00:00): Sockpuppet of:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
omarsoukane 
bob2000
jodie1974
munger2002
barry_fortnite_2002
adam2011
larry_2002
noa2003
omarsouk
larson1974
adams22052003
magic 2001
daisy_2014
Jrachi (2022-04-13 09:16:36+00:00): Ciao.
Forse non ti sei accorto di avere inserito la traccia gps senza pulirla.
Hai lasciato una marea di punti che difficilmente possono essere significativi. A meno che tu non abbia un gps professionale!
Inoltre sono rimasti sui nodi i dati di elevazione. Stesso discorso, ma anche con un rilevamento altamente sofisticato dei dati come: 
ele=287.8724082025169
mi sembra decisamente inutile.
Ivo
Jrachi (2022-04-13 09:20:30+00:00): Dimenticavo...
Hai anche inserito dei tag su sentieri con layer=-1 e layer=-2
Un errore?
Come sai il tag layer indica la posizione relativa di elementi che sono sovrapposti ma non coincidenti, il passaggio in un tunnel avrebbe giustamente layer=-1. Ma non hai indicato il tunnel e dubito che ci sia perché il gps non funziona sottoterra
Ti ringrazio per l'attenzione e continua a mappare.
Ivo
Paolo Benazzo (2022-04-13 13:02:40+00:00): Sì hai ragione, sono un neofita e faccio molti errori. Ho semplicemente riportato quanto registrato dal mio smartphone... 
Cosa devo fare? Usare lo strumento "semplifica percorso"?
Circa i layer confesso di non sapere nemmeno cosa siano...
Jrachi (2022-04-13 14:25:30+00:00): layer: se non sai, forse erano su un tratto di sentiero che hai modificato?
Per info: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
GPX: usa la semplificazione.
Quando hai trasformato il gpx in way seleziona i nodi e cancella i tag che contengono.
Sistemo io i vari errori in zona.

Ivo
Paolo Benazzo (2022-04-13 15:25:45+00:00): Ho fatto qualche piccola correzione ma per il resto credo che sia opportuno che intervenga tu a sistemarlo.
In questa zona c'è un vero casino di sentieri o tracce di strade di bosco create dal passaggio di moto e trattori...
Jrachi (2022-04-13 15:50:40+00:00): Ho passato un'oretta a fare correzioni.
Tanti sentieri?
Suggerimento: mappa solo quelli che sono veri sentieri, lascia perdere le tracce temporanee lasciate dal passaggio dei trattori o dei rovina-tutto motociclisti.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-10 01:49:45+00:00): You added a duplicate building in this changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118109091
eggie (2022-03-05 06:22:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback ..  Wegen op bedrijven terreinen zijn meestal highway=unclassified. De toegangswegen op het terrein zelf meestal highway=service
Ik heb het aangepast. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-03-05 06:36:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the documentation for highway=raceway (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Draceway). I revert your mistakes.
kartonage (2022-03-06 12:58:53+00:00): Hej, 
quick information because you have added quite a few buildings with the following tags:

building = Residential building

Usually there are no values/tags for elements in OSM with a space in between. And they should be lowercase So it would be best to just tag them as, because that is a common value understood by everyone:

building = residential

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=residential

Otherwise other mappers might have to retag or remap the buildings again.

Best regards
user_5359 (2022-03-06 15:48:21+00:00): See also https://www.osm.org/changeset/117991687, https://www.osm.org/changeset/117985334. Unfortunately no reaction.
Rainero (2022-03-07 21:47:21+00:00): Hallo Eagle870,

du hast die Adresse der DRK-Garage Göppingen berichtigt, aber jetzt ist der Punkt mitten am Acker gelandet. Scheint etwas widerspenstig zu sein.
Das Gebäude Eichertstraße 1 ist mehrteilig; besser du verschiebst den Punkt an die richtige Stelle als wenn ich rate.

Grüße,
Rainer
Eagle870 (2022-03-09 08:55:25+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
danke ist mir leider nicht aufgefallen, ich habs richtig gestellt
Gruß Andy
luin132 (2022-03-04 22:30:18+00:00): I meant to say Agregada geometría faltante. #Kaart;
Maxar Premium Imagery;Mapbox Satellite;Esri World Imagery (Clarity);Esri World Imagery;Bing Imagery
literan (2022-03-05 13:15:46+00:00): Добрый день.

Подскажите, что за маршрут имеется в виду?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13890701
user_5359 (2022-03-05 06:36:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the documentation for highway=raceway (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Draceway). I revert your mistakes.
maro21 (2022-03-09 19:26:37+00:00): Co to jest school_osmp wiki?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-09 20:05:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Organised_Editing/Activities/Updating_and_mapping_schools_in_Poland
felipeeugenio (2022-03-18 18:02:31+00:00): Hola
Las playas de preferencia son un polígono. un punto en casos muy especiales, pero siempre en donde está la playa, no el mar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach). saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-03-18 18:03:13+00:00): voy a intentar expresarlo mejor. de ahí por favor revisar. saludos
EMREOYUN (2022-03-21 17:06:03+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
eggie (2022-03-05 06:34:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap.  
Feedback  ... De camping staat al op de kaart op het vlak. U zou ook de gegevens op het vlak kunnen aanvullen bij description. 
Uw edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118110434

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DD1GJ (2022-03-28 18:49:19+00:00): changed to abandoned:highway=helipad, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-09 22:40:32+00:00): None of these features need a layer tag
Kuatsystems (2022-03-09 23:10:43+00:00): thanks, i was trying to figure out how to show the water in the pools
angys (2022-03-18 10:19:11+00:00): Hello, can you show how the road is named Jio, jio is not a common road name format in Malaysia
Klamath (2022-03-21 23:32:21+00:00): Thank you for the information on local street name formatting here. As such, your street name suggestion makes sense.
Queiròz_Anderssen10 (2022-03-04 23:33:06+00:00): With too Northwest Fluminense region, because municipality Cambuci belongs to this region or administrative territory, according to IBGE- Economy Ministery/GOV-BR
Queiròz_Anderssen10 (2022-03-04 23:35:12+00:00): Sorry...belongs to North Fluminense Region...!
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-03-04 23:26:10+00:00): Source here is the MD iMAP/Open Baltimore Street Centerline data.
kucai (2022-10-15 04:43:54+00:00): Congrats. Are you saying the road is named Razak Mansion? I doubt it (just abnormal road naming practice), but I am willing to be corrected.
MxxCon (2022-03-04 23:40:35+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete these building features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118110869
VLD195 (2022-03-07 18:57:02+00:00): Hello MxxCon,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I see now that my edit had caused some confusion. I will work to improve my editing skills and I will revert my edits.

Sincerely,
Allyson
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-04-14 16:52:53+00:00): You are using outdated aerial imagery to update recently mapped paths. Also you've removed some ways and made Linnuse tee inaccessible from Narva mnt. 

Please be careful! I'm not fixing junctions after you without a reason. It's not other people's job to constantly fix stuff after you, while you enjoy your mapping and ignore all the comments.
eggie (2022-03-05 06:39:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback.. Altijd lastig als iets twee functies heeft. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode nr 13


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Allison P (2022-04-15 09:08:13+00:00): Please don't use the name tag to describe features, like with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037242022.
maraf24 (2022-03-05 16:45:02+00:00): Skąd pochodzą te godziny?
SeanGizzi22 (2022-03-05 00:26:09+00:00): edit* 44 points
MikeN (2022-03-05 20:00:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  The landuse is normally to an outline of the entire property.   Also since this has been converted to residential, the current surrounding landuse would be residential.   The building would remain industrial as built, even with residences.
user_12454690 (2022-03-05 02:50:07+00:00): Yes, it was not under construction, and it was also tagged as proposed. This is for historical purposes for future Wikipedia article development.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-05 05:01:49+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`, which is for proper names only. This is expressed in `description:zh=`, and `description:en=`. The object is carrying `demolished:aerialway=gondola`, highlighting the fact it should be the original name.
Minh Nguyen (2022-04-29 15:50:45+00:00): Thanks for updating the airport concessions! By the way, it probably would’ve been a good idea to keep the closed POIs around but with just the address (stall number). For example, node 4853689423 could’ve kept its addr:unit tag, which presumably won’t change even if something has replaced that bakery.
Resplendent (2022-04-29 23:13:47+00:00): Appreciate the suggestion!!
Diacritic (2022-03-06 11:00:11+00:00): Hey Oscar,

Thanks for your contributions here. :)

I noticed that you converted a parking aisle on the rooftop of the shopping centre to an escalator/steps (786055966) was that intentional?

Also, quick tip in case you weren’t aware: you can use the ‘Q’ key to make the corners of building square. It saves me a lot of time and makes the angles nice and perfect.

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118113177
woodpeck (2022-07-26 23:27:56+00:00): In this changeset you have changed the "Sweet Pea" trail, which is closed to the public as recorded by me in a previous changeset, from "access=no" to "foot=no" and "horse=no", thereby erroneously marking it as ok to use for cyclists. Combined with the misleading changeset description of "alignment" this has a distinctive smell of mountain bike vandalism. I am not local but I have been told by a local park ranger that the path is closed and signs are posted to that effect. If you want to record this path as open to cyclists, please provide supporting evidence. "I want to ride there" is not sufficient reason to mark something as allowed for cycling.
SikeMo (2022-07-27 01:08:09+00:00): I hope you feel better now.
woodpeck (2022-07-27 14:24:08+00:00): This is not about how I feel but about OSM's public standing: Are we the map that represents truth on the ground, or are we the map that represents wishful thinking of rabid mountainbikers. I prefer the former.
nevw (2022-03-05 03:47:17+00:00): Hi
you appear to be rushing your task and sacrificing accuracy. There should be a "square menu item" in iD to help make the corners square in rectangular shapes.
Giuseppe Salvador (2022-03-05 03:50:56+00:00): Fuente oficial: Twitter Ciclolima: https://twitter.com/CicloLima/status/1481755957772365830
Giuseppe Salvador (2022-03-05 03:51:17+00:00): Fuente extra: Recorrido detallado: https://youtu.be/uONF1NKZcOU
impiaaa (2022-03-06 19:04:33+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! When deleting closed businesses, it's better to just remove the name and set shop=vacant, rather than delete the node entirely, if it has any other information on it like the location's address.
Resplendent (2022-03-06 19:31:19+00:00): Thank you!
WoodWoseWulf (2022-03-06 09:37:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Please do not add fictional features to the map, they will be found and removed.
user_5359 (2022-03-05 17:42:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2956292. What ist the meaning of the booth unknown tags
adr_less = 13-21-2-07-45 - -
id_ob = 276
?
maro21 (2022-03-09 19:28:46+00:00): Please look at the history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2956292/history and ask their author. They're probably useless, from old import.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:14:41+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-05 09:13:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5743
Glassman (2022-03-05 23:06:55+00:00): #TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118114081
boopington (2022-03-06 05:27:03+00:00): why did you add the expressway back?
drivec (2022-05-11 02:14:37+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
attili1 (2022-03-24 07:37:44+00:00): Hi TagaSanPedroAko,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that some of the ways such as way 1037270950,way 83146430,way 1037270949,way 83146428 are created as untagged and service ways instead of motorway_link. As per OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) these connectors between motorways should be marked as motorway_link. Please do look into it and let us know if you think otherwise.


Regards
Manoj