piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2019-11-23 19:37:54+00:00): Hi, this is a motorway service area. It is a little unlikely that there will be supermarket here. The mapper who added this will have mapped what they saw.
Please do not take the name suggestion index literally as this devalues the contributions of local mappers.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-12-11 18:59:33+00:00): Reverted Waitrose back to convienience. Mapper has not responded to previous comments
user_5359 (2019-11-24 17:02:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474454 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
user_5359 (2019-11-24 17:01:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-11-24 16:58:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
naomap (2020-03-06 09:09:29+00:00): Bonjour.
Cette voie de service https://www.osm.org/way/749010817 existe-t-elle vraiment ? J'ai l'impression que l'accès au parking se fait uniquement par l'est, mais n'étant pas sur place je n'en suis pas sûr...
Antoine.
Xavb22440 (2020-03-06 09:13:34+00:00): Bonjour,

L'accès au parking oui, mais les bus de la régie entrent eux de ce côté puisque le quai au niveau 0 leur est réservé. et ils ressortent de l'autre côté.
naomap (2020-03-06 09:17:16+00:00): Ok merci. J'ai l'impression qu'il y a pas mal de mises à jour à faire au sud et au nord de la passerelle. Une campagne de photos sur Mapillary serait très utiles ;-)
Bonne continuation.
Xavb22440 (2020-03-06 09:22:13+00:00): Tout est à revoir sur le secteur intégralement. Tout a été modifié.
Mais je réside sur la commune d'à côté Ploufragan et c'était surtout pour ma ligne de transport que j'avais fait qq modifs sur Saint-Brieuc
dgitto (2019-11-25 18:01:01+00:00): Hi. this does not work!
If a way ha no "building" key, it is not a building in OSM.
"building:2014_11_11" is not interpreted as building at all. (and in fact you cannot see them on the map)
dgitto (2019-11-25 18:02:55+00:00): and whenever you use a date in OSm, the format has to be the standard ISO: "2018-04-21", never 2018_04_21"
yopaseopor+catastro (2019-11-26 21:00:53+00:00): Sorry for the typo error. It is tagged as you can read in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:31:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474480 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
PT-53 (2019-11-24 09:35:54+00:00): Hallo von juliw,
Willkommen bei OSM.
Für die Ladestation 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7004421007/history
sollten noch weitere Merkmale eingetragen werden:
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:20:33+00:00): Hallo von juliw,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-15 10:05:46+00:00):     Hallo von juliw,
    Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
    Fragende Grüße
Glassman (2019-11-23 23:05:15+00:00): fyi: OSM uses opening_hours to tag the hours of operation. It looks like someone already corrected it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77463572
user_5359 (2019-11-24 16:52:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. See https://www.osm.org/node/7004443654, https://www.osm.org/node/7004416095
opendcc (2019-11-23 19:37:06+00:00): Hallo,

bei Einöden ohne Siedlungsstraße besser addr:place statt addr.street verwenden.
wireguy (2019-11-23 20:20:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   thanks for adding the name and address.  I was in the area, mapping to the west of this and noticed an error.  I corrected the street name abbreviation, and removed the extra way that was added.  I also added the outline of the building and combined it with your node info.  Keep up the mapping.
dmnapolitano (2019-11-25 22:00:56+00:00): Hello!  Thank you for the warm welcome and your help!  Apologies for my error, and thanks for correcting it.  Now I know what to do going forward (I think...).  It's cool to talk to local mappers :)  Have a great week and Thanksgiving!
Tomas Straupis (2019-11-23 19:35:01+00:00): Čia tikriausiai kažkas negerai? Nes name žyma gavosi „Raktų gamyba ir“, tuo tarpu name:lt „Raktų gamyba ir kompiuterinės technikos sprendimai“.
Šiaip siūlyčiau per maps.me nebent pastabas registruoti, redaguoti stipriai nerekomenduočiau, nes tai labai prastai Maskvoje parašyta aplikacija. Keisti duomenis siūlyčiau su JOSM, ar blogiausiui atveju su iD redaktoriumi.
user_5359 (2019-11-24 16:48:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474523 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
mueschel (2019-11-26 09:58:55+00:00): Hi,
could you check these charging stations? You wrote 'sockets' instead of 'socket'.

Jan
NKA (2019-11-26 10:06:12+00:00): Thanks
fgouget (2020-04-30 18:49:35+00:00): 'Kerskolan' ne devrait pas être dans le champ population (qui doit être une valeur numérique avec le nombre d'habitants). Peut-être faut-il le déplacer vers name:br ?
Alhamdulillah (2019-11-23 18:40:17+00:00): Which woods have you modified here?
eggie (2019-11-23 18:57:09+00:00): GH Het is toch wel uitermate merkwaardig dat je na de hele discussie paden die helemaal geen fietspad zijn  in fietspaden gaat veranderen.
Kun je nu uitleggen waarom je er zomaar een fietspad van maakt/.
Welk bord staat er vooraan?
Heb je de voorgaande mapper geconsulteerd.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-23 18:58:12+00:00): reverted by changeset #77466451
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474558 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:40:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474598 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
eisa01 (2023-01-04 07:28:02+00:00): Hello, I was out running here and this cycling route is not marked in any way

I also see you have added "back scooter" attractions in another change set. I assume you also added all the other "cycling route" tourist attractions in the area?

What was the source of this, has the sign been taken down?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77654229
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474618 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
mueschel (2019-11-24 17:38:22+00:00): Hi,
hier ist noch ein Knoten mit falschen Tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7004602107

Gruss, Jan
NavneethS (2020-08-16 18:21:54+00:00): Hello! I would like to work with you in mapping this particular location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/77465972
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474640 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
wille (2020-02-28 10:21:24+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição. A via que você alterou o sentido é de mão única para carros. Apenas ônibus podem circular no sentido contrário. Fiz a correção.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/77466159
Alexsandre (2020-02-28 17:19:43+00:00): Muito obrigado pela correção. Você poderia me explicar a correção que você realizou para que eu cometa esse erro?
trial (2019-11-30 21:41:02+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap. Comme vous voyez votre contribution a permis à un autre d'ajouter le code ref:FR:FINESS (et donc de lier les informations sur cette pharmacie avec la base de données FINESS)
viloan (2019-11-23 18:43:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mike Baggaley (2019-12-30 00:50:09+00:00): HI, welcome to OpenStreetMap, just thought you might like to know that when mapping a stream going through a culvert under a road, this should be mapped by leaving the road as an unbroken way, and splitting the stream either side of the road and tagging the bit that goes under the road with tunnel=culvert. Happy mapping,
Mike
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474664 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
angys (2019-11-25 15:06:41+00:00): Thank you very much for your land use update, hope that you can continue this project till all the Johor state.
lmum (2019-11-25 23:52:18+00:00): Thanks! Nice to know you noticed the project. I only have plans to do the Iskandar region for now--manually tracing land use is time intensive.
kreuzschnabel (2020-05-11 11:57:05+00:00): Hi Andy, in this CS, you added https://osm.org/node/3700726903 but didn’t provide any access tagging. I have a habit of at least putting access=yes to any barriers on PROW in order not to block any allowed traffic by accident, despite of most routers ignoring such issues and routing through nevertheless.
PT-53 (2019-11-25 12:07:13+00:00): Hallo TGIS,
nach Deinen Änderungen werden im OSM-Inspector einige Linien ohne Merkmale angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.13329&lat=48.72092&zoom=18&opacity=0.25&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 10:51:22+00:00): erledigt
alesarrett (2020-01-08 18:27:56+00:00): Hi there, I see that you've used a strange key height:2019 It seems an error, because using the check_date you've already specified a time-related information...
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:52:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474690 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
betalars (2019-11-24 14:01:08+00:00): I'd like to point out that just as my more recent edit the source of all the information updated here is also local knowledge.
gscholz (2019-11-30 10:02:32+00:00): Hi armnd,
your recent changeset have created a big amount of errors in the osm database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-80.45850&lat=-1.05740&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please fix this?

Guido
SomeoneElse (2019-11-27 14:26:17+00:00): Hello,
This changeset covers a huge are.  What is your source for this edit?  Osmose isn't a source, just an indication of things that a local mapper might want to look at.  What changes did you actually make here and why?
Best Regards,
Andy
Mond00 (2019-11-27 20:25:30+00:00): Excuse me, the frame so big became and this is absent a comment. To hold attempts normally the frames smaller.

I could be indicated on the web page osmosis the highway mistake and had corrected the mistakes there. The concept footway was changed only in sidewalk.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-03 21:09:03+00:00): If you feel the need to make mechanical edits to OpenStreetMap data, please read the page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and follow the instructions there. In particular, you’ll see that that page documents the level of discussion that you must have with the rest of the community before carrying out mechanical edits.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-03 21:11:13+00:00): As a side-note about OsmOse, I regular use OsmOse reports as input when mapping (with Vespucci).  However, approximately half of the reports that I see are false positives because whoever designed the checks simply does not understand how OSM data is used.  It is therefore simply not OK to apply OsmOse checks over a wide region like this.
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-12 08:23:19+00:00): Hi Andy, I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5349980733 should be in the partial route relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7336319) instead of the superroute.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-14 00:57:08+00:00): Thanks - yes it should.  I've moved it.
That's now 3 C2C markers I've found so far - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7336319 - and one of those was drawn in permanent marker on a gatepost!
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-14 08:09:39+00:00): Since the C2C is an officially unmarked trail, that’s quite a lot :) I’ve seen some more hints towards the east on my several C2C attempts but I wouldn’t bet they’re still there.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
eggie (2019-11-23 21:38:51+00:00): reverted by changeset #77469484  in spite of discussion at the Dutch forum. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=770007#p770007
Famlam (2019-11-23 20:09:55+00:00): Half Nijmegen gemarkeerd als wijziging omdat ik wat 'duplicate nodes' heb samengevoegd op de Nijmeegsebaan... :)
dvdhoven (2019-11-24 06:31:18+00:00): Je hebt een aantal relaties "geraakt" en dan worden de hele relaties als gewijzigd gezien.
Kijk maar hieronder in het blokje relaties.
Busroutes kunnen flink lang zijn.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2019-11-24 07:24:53+00:00): Ik heb de routes rond knooppunt 08 hersteld, de routes volgden daar nog het oude model van het fietsknooppuntennetwerk, de zogenaamde tentakels. Ik heb de routes nu rond laten lopen, knooppunten uit de routes gehaald, knooppuntnamen worden niet met name getagd, maar met rcn:name= 
Ook de plaats van de knooppunten aangepast, die waren ook nog volgens het tentakelmodel, nu worden op een plek gezet, waar je echt kunt afslaan

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Famlam (2019-11-24 13:34:32+00:00): Dankjewel voor je uitleg! 
Ik denk dat ik begrijp wat je bedoelt, behalve dat mij niet helemaal duidelijk is waarom 08-58 niet rond hoeft te lopen op de rotonde, en de andere twee wel?
dvdhoven (2019-11-24 14:16:34+00:00): 08-58 had ik nog niet gedaan. Die had nog een tentakel. Ik heb hem nu ook rond gemaakt. Bij deze route kun je er ook voor kiezen hem niet over de rotonde te leggen. De andere routes geven al aan welke delen van de rotonde door fietsknooppuntnetwerk bestreken worden.
De andere routes, die bij 08 aankomen, komen allemaal met forward/backward aan, dus daar is rondlopen een must om het plaatje in de route editor mooi te krijgen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
hybridOL (2019-12-18 16:00:35+00:00): Du hast hier ein Stück aus der Buslinie entfernt und keine Alternativstrecke eingefügt. Ich weiß daher, auch aufgrund des wenig hilfreichen Kommentars, nichts damit anzufangen und würde die Strecke wieder einfügen.
mardiz (2019-12-18 21:20:37+00:00): Wenn ich das richtig gesehen habe, fährt die Linie in beiden Richtungen durch die Admiralstraße
hybridOL (2019-12-18 23:56:08+00:00): Du hast aber lediglich einige Teile der Admiralstraße aus der Relation gelöscht. Sie lief also schon durch die Admiralstraße und ist nun unvollständig.
viloan (2019-11-23 20:36:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-11-23 20:44:31+00:00): Henk... 
Tip.. De echte doorgaande straten kun je beter op unclassified laten staan en de straten die duidelijk de wijkdelen inlopen zet je op residential. Dan kunnen de routeplanners een logische route berekenen. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-23 20:45:56+00:00): Ook hier is consensus over. Het is dus niet zo dat unclassified niet in de bebouwde kom voorkomt.
pio2_122 (2019-11-23 20:43:50+00:00): name=MOSRiR? Raczej operator=MOSRiR
Tyrese Wormely (2020-01-23 04:23:02+00:00): *Jefferson
FrankXF (2020-01-09 21:20:15+00:00): Hallo Weasel-Wiesel, 
danke für das Wiederherstellen des railway=halt. Wer hat die gelöscht?
Dieser Halt gehört leider in keine Relation. Die Routen haben nur die stop/platform/leer Rollen. Damit schlägt die Validierung der Routen fehl. 
Für die stop area ist sie leider auch nicht definiert. PT2 ist da strict.
Mfg, FrankXF
Weasel-Wiesel (2020-01-15 08:53:10+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur. Wer den Halt gelöscht hat und warum, kann ich nicht sagen.
Allison P (2020-02-20 04:01:30+00:00): Baca County is tagged as highway=primary, surely this is a mistake?

Allison Pelton
Baloo Uriza (2020-02-20 04:50:28+00:00): Yup, fortunately a nonroutable error at least.  Not sure how I managed to pull that one off without noticing.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-05-31 14:22:09+00:00): The official language in Saudi Arabia is Arabic. so please use Arabic for tags on name=* and do not change the Arabic language if you want to use International name please use int_name, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia
osm10005 (2021-06-08 21:42:25+00:00): Assalamu Aleikum, there are two spoken languages in Saudi Arabia, Arabic and English. Makkah and Medina are the two holy cities where are each year millions of people from all countries of the world travel to it, to make Hadj and Omra. There are a lot of people who don’t speak the arabic language.

The practical problem for openstreetmap.org and osmand in the two international cities Makkah and Medina is:

if there is written the field “name” in “arabic” and the field “name:en” in english and other multilanguages are not exists, people with arabic language can see the arabic name, people with english language see the english name, but people with other languages can only see the arabic name and they cannot understand what is written.

if there is written the field “name” in “english” and the field “name:ar” in arabic and other multilanguages are not exists: People with arabic language can see the arabic name, people with english language can see the english name and also all people with other languages can see the english name. So the people can unterstand what is written.

I prefer that the field “name” is written in english and arabic, so all muslims of the world can read it. For example in Morocco is mostly used the field “name” in french and arabic language.

You can test this for example with the osmand app. Change the language of the osmand app and you can see this.

Best regards
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-06-09 19:22:57+00:00): waealaykum alsalam, I am Saudi and I am from Saudi Arabia and our official language is Arabic only. English is a common language and not official language and only a few people speak it. The names of the places in Mecca and Medina are Arabic in origin and common and accepted that they are written in Arabic as well, and for international names and other languages use Other tags for names such as: name:en=*, name:de=*, int_name=*... etc, and for Osmand, the name will be displayed according to the user's language, and he can do this by adjusting the application settings and this is explained here:
https://docs.osmand.net/en/main@latest/osmand/map/vector-maps#map-language
and
https://osmand.net/features/start
and arabic:
https://arabmap.wordpress.com/2020/10/19/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d8%ad-%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ae%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%a6%d8%b7-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b7%d8%a8%d9%82%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d9%84%d8%a8%d8%b1%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%ac-osmand/#%D8%B6%D8%A8%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9

Best regards
Abdullah
Cheeto (2019-11-23 21:22:59+00:00): What does the ID mean ("CFV231120192109")?
gscholz (2019-11-30 10:02:40+00:00): Hi armnd,
your recent changeset have created a big amount of errors in the osm database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-80.45850&lat=-1.05740&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please fix this?

Guido
gscholz (2019-12-04 05:47:26+00:00): Hi armnd,
can you please respond to my request and take over responsibility for your errors?
Guido