piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AkuAnakTimur (2017-03-27 09:08:37+00:00): I will stick to something simple and official. Which place got Majlis Bandaraya, and which place not have Majlis Bandaraya - got only Majlis Perbandaran.

Even Sungai Petani is under Majlis Perbandaran Sungai Petani, not Majlis Bandaraya Sungai Petani. It's official, Sungai Petani is only place=town, not place=city.

Come and discuss in the forum. Open new table, discuss.
angys (2017-03-30 07:59:58+00:00): So that mean you only reconize MB/DBs as a city?But the great city status normally is a capital too(only PJ is not a capital).Some place cannot get city status because money tax...So my side is MB/DB absolute a city.MP sometime is a city sometime not.
trigpoint (2017-03-19 16:25:44+00:00): Has the building been demolished?
sam kenney (2017-03-19 16:42:40+00:00): Yes and has been replaced by fuel station
RoterEmil (2017-03-19 17:13:22+00:00): statt mal auf einen meiner Kommentare zu reagieren, 20(!) neue changesets draufgelegt: schade!
utack (2017-03-19 18:30:41+00:00): Hi Toni,  
  
wilkommen (zurück) bei OSM.  
Eine kleine Anmerkung:  
"ele=0" heißt dass es auf Meereshöhe ist, den key bitte wieder entfernen  
Die Angabe "level=0" ist die korrekte, und ausreichend.
toni37 (2017-03-19 20:45:48+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, habe ich korrigiert.
felipeeugenio (2017-04-24 15:49:48+00:00): Cómo un cruce es una atracción?
ulmtuelp (2017-03-20 08:49:41+00:00): Hier hat es versehentlich ein große Menge Verschiebungen einzelner Punkte und damit von Flächen und Straßen im Bereich des Stausees Unterbecken gegeben. Bitte mal  schauen.
sfrank (2017-03-20 20:15:25+00:00): Sollte jetzt gefixt sein.
JOSM hat nicht aufgehört, Daten zu laden, dabei ist wohl was schief gegangen.
literan (2017-03-20 12:00:22+00:00): Привет! Пожалуйста, не стоит тег amenity=pharmacy дублировать еще и в названии. Если не знаешь, как называется аптека, просто оставь это поле пустым. Я поправлю.
sander79 (2018-08-08 07:48:39+00:00): Hoi Gert,

het is niet nodig om turn restrictions toe te voegen om aan te geven dat een auto niet op een fietspad mag rijden.
PT-53 (2017-03-19 19:10:35+00:00): Hallo rainerU,
Du hast diesen Feldweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38193816#map=16/48.2508/9.8509) überarbeitet und access=agricultural eingetragen. Das würde bedeuten, daß nicht einmal Fußgänger und Radfahrer diesen Weg benutzen dürfen.Das kann doch wohl kaum stimmen.
Welche Verkehrsschilder stehen denn dort ?
rainerU (2017-03-20 07:28:40+00:00): Diese Attribute stammen nicht von mir, ich habe sie nur von dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157886146/history übernommen. Die eigentliche Änderung war die Umwandlung eines Stücks highway=cycleway westlich der L259 in einen Track. Leider ist beim Aufteilen und Zusammenfassen der existierenden Wege die Historie verlorengegangen. Man findet dieselben Attribute noch an anderen Tracks im Umfeld, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142496163

Ich halte access=agricultural auch für falsch, habe aber keine Änderung vorgenommen, da ich mich beim Bearbeiten auf Bing und Maillary gestützt habe und die Beschilderung vor Ort daraus nicht ersichtlich ist. 

Ich danke für den Hinweis und werde in Zukunft beim Aufteilen darauf achten, dass die Historie erhalten bleibt.
GerdP (2017-08-23 08:41:27+00:00): Hi!
I've noted that you sometimes use the tag highway=alley, e..g here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481387231
This is an usual tag, I know highway=service + service=alley, but that doesn't seem to apply here. What is meant?
GinaroZ (2017-03-19 19:00:22+00:00): Hi, just to let you know that with roundabouts like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478681438, you need to add the junction=roundabout tag instead of oneway=yes
JamesKingdom (2017-03-19 19:11:42+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for this info, I have been doing all my roundabouts with one way tag.
I will do it this way from now on.
I have changed this roundabout to the correct format.
James
highflyer74 (2017-04-07 06:53:11+00:00): Hallo!

Kannst Du mir mal sagen, warum Du die Öffnungszeiten verschlechtert hast? Ich hatte sie korrekt eingetragen.

Oder ist das ein Maps.Me Problem? Da Du nie auf meine Changeset Kommentare antwortest, will ich Dir keine Boshaftigkeit unterstellen, Dich aber nochmals bitten, Stellung zu nehmen.

Ich revertiere Deine Änderung daher.
Dhbd19 (2017-04-07 14:10:21+00:00): Hi. Entschuldige mich bitte. Ich hatte mein paSswort vergessen. habe da leider nichts geändert. 

Gruß 

Dennis
highflyer74 (2017-04-07 14:17:39+00:00): Hi!

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Lies Dir bitte auch die anderen Kommentare an Deinen Changesets einmal durch. Die App Maps.Me ist leider keine gute Grundlage, um OSM zu editieren.

Nutze bitte einen richtigen Editor. Wenn Du da Hilfe benötigst, melde Dich gern per PM.

Kannst Du bestätigen, daß Du an diesem Geschäft keine Änderungen an den Öffnungszeiten vorgenommen hast? Aus irgendwelchen Gründen wurde "Sa,Su,PH off" aus den Öffnungszeiten gelöscht und es fällt mir schwer, nachzuvollziehen, wie das geschehen ist.

Viele Grüße, Oliver
Dhbd19 (2017-04-09 19:53:19+00:00): Hi. Das ist doch dann richtig. Sa. und So. sind die auch geschlossen. Was PH heisst weiss ich leider nicht.
highflyer74 (2017-04-12 11:09:40+00:00): Ja, das kommt, weil ich es in der Zwischenzeit wieder korrigiert hatte :-) Du kannst die Änderungen an einem Objekt sehen, in dem Du es auswählst (nicht mit Maps.Me, sondern in OSM selbst) und auf "Chronik anzeigen" klickst.

PH heisst "Public Holiday", also gesetzlicher Feiertag. Das Tagging muss zwingend in dieser Form erfolgen, da Software wie z.B. Kartenapps die Öffnungszeiten sonst nicht auswerten können. Du findest alle Informationen zum richtigen Tagging im OSM Wiki. Lies Dich bitte einmal in die Grundlagen von OSM ein. Du kannst dies z.B. mit diesem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf Tutorial machen, welches Du als PDF herunterladen kannst. Und bitte editiere in Zukunft mit einem richtigen Editor, also iD, JOSM etc.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
LorenzoStucchi (2019-02-02 17:37:06+00:00): Buongiorno ho visto che al'interno di questo changest questo edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2616453 è stato mappato come una relazione, ma non possedendo particolari forme che richiedono la relazione, non è più opportuno che resti un'area come era mappata in precedenza?
nebulon42 (2019-02-02 18:21:48+00:00): Automatic translation, English original below:
Ciao, non l'ho mappata come relazione che era stata mappata come tale prima. Ho appena cambiato il tagging da uno schema di tagging vecchio stile ad uno stile più nuovo e meglio supportato. Ma hai ragione, non sembra essere necessario. Ho rimosso il multipoligono ora, grazie per averlo notato!

Hi, I didn't map it as relation it was mapped as such before. I just changed the tagging from a old-style tagging scheme to a newer and better supported style. But you are right it doesn't seem to be necessary. I have removed the multipolygon now, thanks for noticing!
Hoff1980 (2017-03-19 18:33:39+00:00): Bonjour, 
J'ai vu que vous avez ajouté un hôpital sur les hauteurs d'Abondance dans un endroit très perdu. Je ne connais pas la région très bien, mais j'ai de fort doutes qu'il y est vraiment. Je pense que c'est une erreur... Sinon jeté voir un coup d'oeil aux deux pages suivantes du Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:amenity et http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency 
Merci
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Borut@OSM (2017-03-19 23:01:30+00:00): Der Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122768559 hat seit Anfang seiner Zeit den Tag route=hiking. Nach meinem Verständnis sollen mit diesem Tag nur die Routen/Relationen getagged werden. Wäre es nicht richtiger, wenn es sac_scale=hiking lauten würde? Habe aber keine Ortskenntnisse.
fkv (2017-03-19 23:41:57+00:00): Ja, das gleiche hab ich mir auch gedacht, aber ich hab es nicht bei allen Wegabschnitten umgesetzt. Jetzt hab ich es nachgeholt. Ich glaube zwar nicht, dass mit route=hiking die Schwierigkeit gemeint war (sondern eher dass das ein Wanderweg ist), aber sac_scale=hiking wird schon stimmen.

Ortskenntnis habe ich auch keine (ich editiere die Gegend nur um GPS-Tracks eines Freundes zu verwerten), aber man sieht auf den Luftbildern, dass der Weg weder schwierig noch gefährlich ist.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
elgolfo (2017-04-23 12:16:52+00:00): Changeset fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48058577/ Details dort
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
rab (2017-03-19 18:34:14+00:00): Hi,
you are adding on problem after another.
Please see http://maproulette.org/map/2414/2045309
Stop using ID
Never connect areas with roads
ian727 (2017-03-19 19:00:44+00:00): I'm aware of the problem being shown in your link and I am not using this method anymore in my recent edits. The whole area will be re-mapped since I consider my old edits to be un-accurate - and, like you pointed out, mapped in a wrong way.

I do not see what you mean by "Never connect areas with roads"; does it refer to the problem you pointed out with the link? Or is it another issue? Why should areas not be connected to roads? You can find areas connected to roads in OSM all over the world.

I'll gladly listen to any advice to improve my way(s) of mapping.

Cheers,

ian727
rab (2017-03-19 21:36:25+00:00): Sorry, I was a bit in a bad mood, after I was been pointed to your Edits several times in a row.
What I meant, are polygons like this. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427362287
This Landuse - Road glueing, will make future edits extremely unconvenient. You should also avoid to draw areas of the same type over each other.
Like here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392956717 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465967378
More information can be found here
http://area.jochentopf.com/
ian727 (2017-03-19 21:41:59+00:00): No problem, I see what mistakes I did. However, those areas were mapped by me almost one year ago and I can assure you that my "mapping style" has changed, especially now that I was made aware of the complications. I'm currently reworking all the super-huge areas starting from the south of Gungu town, but it takes a lot of time since I try to keep the best level of detail the sattelite imagery offers.

Thanks for letting me know!

As you are not the only one who has recently contacted me about my edits, I assume that I've been flagged somewhere. Maybe you could leave them a comment that I am aware of the issues and will fix them as soon as time allowes. 

Have a nice day,

ian727
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Felipe Alves (2017-03-20 15:21:30+00:00): Oi, Fabiano. Corrigi apenas as tags do santuário que inseriu, pois a Wiki determina sempre a adição da tag amenity=place_of_worship

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
Felipe Alves (2017-03-20 15:26:38+00:00): Inclusive, depois que vi a imagem de satélite, via que não é essa área toda que é uma construção. A tag building=church deve ser aplicada apenas à igreja mesmo, caso possa corrigir.
Abs
eggie (2017-03-19 22:15:02+00:00): Kijk... dat is een betere edit :)
Gewoon simpel beginnen. Kijk ook op ons forum. Daar kun je ook alle hulp krigen bij het mappen. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
naoliv (2017-03-20 06:16:05+00:00): Jonatas, o que você está utilizando para obter o limite de velocidade das ruas?
Jonatas Marques (2017-04-09 22:39:37+00:00): Eu estou usando o Google StreetView para ver se tem alguma placa de sinalização, caso contrário, eu uso o Código de Trânsito Brasileiro que dá uma referência sobre as velocidades limites para determinados tipos de vias.
naoliv (2017-04-12 20:34:46+00:00): O uso do Google StreetView ainda é muito indefinido e "cinzento".
Por exemplo, veja a discussão em https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps
De forma geral, não podemos utilizar produtos do Google para inserir objetos no mapa (basicamente pelas limitações impostas pelos termos de uso)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Na dúvida é melhor não utilizar nada do Google, para evitar possíveis reversões das alterações (e com isso a perda de dados, trabalho, tempo, etc).
Jonatas Marques (2017-04-13 00:58:13+00:00): Obrigado pelo toque, irmão! Eu não estou mais usando o Google Maps ou Google Street View. Pelo fato de ser muito trabalhoso ter que ficar caçando as placas no Street View. E agora que você falou, tem mais esse motivo. Eu descobri que o Mapillary já faz isso pra mim e os dados deles já estão no OSM (https://www.mapillary.com/). O único problema é que eles não cobrem toda a cidade de Araraquara. Eu estava pensando em mapear as ruas principais com o Mapillary. Eu tenho uma GoPro, mas não tenho carro =/ Mas acho que o que já tem já está de bom tamanho para o que eu quero fazer.
naoliv (2017-04-13 14:20:35+00:00): Você é de Araraquara?
Jonatas Marques (2017-04-13 15:57:27+00:00): Eu estudo na USP, São Carlos. Estou fazendo um trabalho de graduação (TCC) sobre o manejo de resíduos sólidos urbanos de Araraquara.
Jonatas Marques (2017-04-13 16:26:23+00:00): Agora estou reconhecendo seu nickname, naoliv ! Foi você quem mapeou Araraquara com o Mapillary? Muito legal! Eu vou para Araraquara na segunda conversar com o pessoal do DAAE. Você se interessa por esse tipo de trabalho?
cMartin (2017-03-20 14:14:57+00:00): Warum hast du das Dach an einen Knoten gemappt?
SK53 (2018-12-03 10:45:10+00:00): Hi Dudley, You mapped this area as a school https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331977095, but I'm pretty sure its the village hall (and mapped it as such because I used iD & didn't notice the school polygon). FHRS do have a playgroup based there. Cheers,
Jerry
dudone (2018-12-03 18:51:22+00:00): Hi Jerry

Thanks for spotting this.  I've checked my images an you are correct.  I've changed this to community_centre which seems to be the right tag.

Regard

Dudley
Øukasz (2017-07-09 09:12:40+00:00): Hello Naseer, 

I think you made duplicate entry - there are two points marked as campsite here.

Is this a mistake?

Thank you
Stalker61 (2017-03-23 15:34:26+00:00): Почитать  бы вам хоть что-то для начала
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair
nammala (2017-03-20 09:51:12+00:00): Hi Justin Exprimesesopinions,

May I know the source of adding the POI's . Could you please let me know about adding these POI's

Regards,
nammala
Stereo (2018-01-09 23:11:22+00:00): Hah, you found imagery from 1971 to use? How cool.
streckenkundler (2017-03-19 20:00:34+00:00): Hei,

bitte schreibe in deinen Changest-Kommentar mehr als "x". Schreibe z.B. Gebäude gezeichnet und/ oder Landuse ergänzt oder so. Bitte schreibe, das, was du gemacht hast... Damit beugst du Beschwerden vor.
Danke.

streckenkundler
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Alecs01 (2017-03-19 20:22:21+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Per favore considera che nel tag "name" va il nome della via, non altro, per il cap c'è il tag postal_code (che è abbastanza inutile nelle città in cui ce n'è solo uno); nemmeno i tag addr: vanno applicati alle strade, le strade hanno un nome, ma non un indirizzo. Ho corretto, se hai bisogno di aiuto chiedi pure, ciao!
GinaroZ (2017-03-19 22:48:00+00:00): Shouldn't this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221196402 be highway=service instead? It seems to primarily serve houses
mountainmonkey (2017-03-22 10:21:04+00:00): Thanks for comment - I've checked http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtrack and I think you're right. Have fixed this one and some others nearby.
GinaroZ (2017-03-19 20:09:17+00:00): thanks for resolving the notes :)
Constable (2017-10-15 17:34:21+00:00): ciao, perché hai rimosso il tag highway=residential da questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255263044 ?
Constable (2017-10-19 16:47:26+00:00): nessuna risposta, ripristino la situazione a com'era prima della tua modifica
robert (2017-03-19 21:14:02+00:00): Good first edit - it looks like there are a lot of footpaths and cut-throughs between cul-de-sacs in this area that need adding in case you wanted to try doing any more editing...
(Welcome to OpenStreetMap!)
chillly (2017-03-25 15:24:25+00:00): Hi, you have drawn the outline of something you have named 'Woodland'. You have used a name as a description which we don't do. If the area is a woodland it needs to be tagged as natural=wood. If it has a real name then it can be added, but a lot of woodland has no name.
chillly (2017-03-25 15:28:04+00:00): We don't add postcodes to area. We only ever add postcodes to individual addresses. These can be a house or a business. To add a postcode the individual buildings can be drawn and have the postcode attached.

Adding a postcode to an area doesn't work well, as most residential areas have multiple postcodes.
RicoElectrico (2017-03-19 22:06:12+00:00): Wygląda OK wg mnie oprócz użycia addr:place zamiast name tutaj:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2599477261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2599477251

Kolega ma jakieś doświadczenie? Bo mimo 2 edycji mam wrażenie, że są robione przez kogoś obytego w OSM
szybki_slup (2017-03-20 07:44:47+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi! Doświadczenie mam, ale w mapowaniu Google Maps. Poza tym mam związek z branżą geodezyjną oraz IT. Postaram się przestudiować wiki oraz forum, żeby nie popełniać takich błędów. W razie czego - miej na mnie oko.
neuhausr (2017-04-11 15:38:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I'm wondering why you created so many different grass areas in this park? It appears they are bounded by the paths. It seems overcomplicated and having the areas along the paths makes it harder to edit in the future. Plus, the grassy areas outside the paths are not tagged.
dbrownson (2017-04-11 15:47:06+00:00): I wanted every inch covered. Yes, it does make editing in the future much harder - however, if nothing really changes topography-wise, you wont need to change anything.
neuhausr (2017-04-11 17:01:31+00:00): So, why not just make one big grass area? Or if you really want to do detailed micro-mapping, grass areas should end next to the paths. (I just edited the small triangle west of the pitches in this way in case you're unsure what I mean)
dbrownson (2017-04-11 17:23:34+00:00): Correct, I want to do detailed micro-mapping. In the case of the triangle that you had changed, sure, it's more correct (since grass isn't on trails) - but if we spend time nit-picking every inch of this map, then we will both see that many things need to be redone. 

For instance, using your example of "grass areas should end next to paths", well then, shouldn't the path width also represent a true value of the width of the paths as well?

In the interest of time and creating a more detailed map, this was a shortcut used. This area is probably more correct than most of the maps in the area, if not the entirety of OSM.
neuhausr (2017-04-11 21:07:56+00:00): Just trying to give you some friendly advice/feedback from someone who's contributed a lot, before you make a lot of detailed but sub-optimal edits that may impact you or another map editor/data user in the future.
Harald Hartmann (2017-03-21 09:10:35+00:00): Hallo BicycIst, wäre vielleicht schön gewesen, wenn du das mehr z.b. hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46976029) kommuniziert/kommentiert hättest, jetzt hat nämlich der User auch nochmal seinen Fehler korrigiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47003138)
utack (2017-05-04 21:08:21+00:00): I entered the road, could you check if it is correct please?
utack (2017-05-04 22:33:19+00:00): You might also be interested in the www.openstreetmap.org website, where you can do avanced editing, including roads
saintam1 (2017-06-20 07:58:14+00:00): Hello, you removed area=yea on a highway=pedestrian way (383174579), which made it appear as a loop when it's an open space. I'm guessing that wasn't intended? Cheers.
nebulon42 (2017-06-20 19:36:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for noticing. I'm pretty sure that wasn't intentional. Thank you for fixing.
saintam1 (2017-06-20 19:37:20+00:00): No problem, just thought I'd flag it up. Thanks for your cleanup efforts.
hadw (2017-05-04 21:57:12+00:00): This changeset is being discussed on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58269
Nakaner (2017-03-19 22:05:13+00:00): Hallo Bicyclst,

warum hast du die beiden Gleise aufgeteilt, obwohl sie vor und nach der Weiche dieselben Tags haben?

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46994316

Durch das Aufteilen der Ways haben alle Relationen, die diese Ways referenzieren, eine neue Version bekommen. Ich habe gleichzeitig an anderer Stelle diese Relationen bearbeitet und habe mich sehr über den Versionskonflikt gefreut.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Zirkon (2017-03-19 21:39:08+00:00): Add Blink Fitness Noho, not Courant
Warin61 (2017-03-20 23:18:24+00:00): Way 481460629 was crossing it self. I have removed the crossing and added detail from the LPI Imagery and added the source tag.
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:12:41+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
hoppyhop (2017-05-13 17:33:36+00:00): This edit has deleted the correct location of Grotta Pitagora added in 4161852398.
Did you visit this location to confirm this?
mueschel (2017-03-20 13:32:12+00:00): Hi,
Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'.

Jan
JessAk71 (2017-03-21 03:59:09+00:00): Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.
tux67 (2018-09-04 12:10:25+00:00): Hi,

ist das Absicht, daß das Passe-Partout als Node des Gebäudeumrisses gelandet ist?

Gruß
tux67
tux67 (2018-09-04 12:10:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635048489
GB_Germany_Vie (2018-09-04 20:10:17+00:00): War natürlich nicht gewollt. Ist bei der umfangreichen Bearbeitung wohl mit gefangen worden und ist geändert. Hintergründe unter 4.5 auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Niederrhein/Viersen/Stammtisch/Import lesen. Ansonsten bitte noch einmal melden. Gruß GB_Germany_Vie
tux67 (2018-09-06 05:11:09+00:00): ok, danke & Gruß