piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RiverBearings (2021-08-04 01:39:12+00:00): Portalaventura - Obrigado por apontar essa área. Eu estava alinhando todos esses dados e não planejava deixar a geometria dobrada ao norte da Rua Fernandes Vieira (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379582533). Esta é uma área com muitos dados densos e eu precisei fazer o upload em vários changesets. Espero que isso ajude a explicar os problemas que você está vendo atualmente. Conforme discutido, estou atualmente adiando outras edições para que possamos discutir mais sobre o telegrama.

Portalaventura - Thanks for pointing out this area. I was in the process of aligning all of this data and did not plan to leave the kinked geometry north of Rua Fernandes Vieira (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379582533). This is a very data dense area and I needed to upload in several changesets. I hope this helps explain the issues you’re seeing currently. As discussed, I am currently holding off on further edits so we can discuss more on telegram.
ivanbranco (2021-08-14 08:43:55+00:00): Ola Erica,

nº of luminaires per pole=1 is not a valid tag.
francians (2021-07-30 04:57:10+00:00): Ciao Edoardo,

Grazie per il contributo.
Sei sicuro che si tratta di un negozio di articoli per l'agricoltura?
Potrebbe essere un agriturismo?

Grazie mille
Francesco
Edoardo Secco (2021-07-30 06:34:37+00:00): Ciao Francesco,
Oh cielo, hai ragione. Solitamente le modifiche le faccio dall'app OsmAnd+, la cui traduzione dall'inglese è ancora incompleta; devo aver scelto la voce errata. Si tratta di un'azienda che vende prodotti locali dalle loro coltivazioni.
Grazie molte a te!
francians (2021-07-30 16:28:27+00:00): Ciao,

Perfetto! Ti consiglio di usare questo tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm

Se non riesci a fare tu la modifica, scrivi pure che la faccio io 

Francesco
Edoardo Secco (2021-07-31 10:30:47+00:00): Perfetto, dovrei aver sistemato.
francians (2021-07-31 10:34:08+00:00): Si, grazie mille!

Francesco
Enock4seth (2021-07-29 21:28:02+00:00): Can you help correlate the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7261473547with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8960832178
Enock4seth (2021-07-29 21:28:19+00:00): * Can you help correlate the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7261473547 with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8960832178
AwezGeo (2021-07-29 22:46:37+00:00): The Sign Post indicated it as Adaklu Torkor and was confirmed by one of the residents
esce (2021-08-09 19:08:22+00:00): Cześć,

na jakiej podstawie dodałeś budowę drogi serwisowej?
Ropino (2022-08-15 12:07:13+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
maxspeed=&0
thx in advance
eggie (2021-07-30 05:21:41+00:00): Dag GeoWandelaar. Lijkt me oke.

Nu mist alleen nog de tracktype=grade???

Dat zal denk ik tracktype=grade2 moeten zijn met surface=compacted. Routers kijken ook naar de tracktype=
Vooral voor fietsers. 
Zie....
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108845825

MVG
eggie
gscholz (2021-07-31 05:57:57+00:00): Hi kbunner,
yout builings are of a very low quality. They do not have a rectangular shape, are mostly to big, stick together even they are clearly separated etc. Please improve your mapping style.
Kind Regards
Guido
BCNorwich (2021-07-30 06:57:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that in most cases, in the absence of a oneway= tag, it is implied that there is no oneway restriction. Therefore oneway=no in these edits is not needed and can be removed.

Regards Bernard.
gscholz (2021-07-31 05:57:41+00:00): Hi Pravina Pidikiti,
yout builings are of a very low quality. They do not have a rectangular shape, are mostly to big, stick together even they are clearly separated etc. Please improve your mapping style.
Kind Regards
Guido
VictorIE (2021-08-01 12:11:57+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968591166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136726559

There are two versions of Plunkett Street. If necessary, you can edit the older version if details needed to be added.
eburnett23 (2021-07-29 21:30:58+00:00): Forgot to add the #creditsuisse
vonrockos (2021-07-30 08:04:01+00:00): Восстановил те парковки, которые специально построены именно как парковки, хотя и не обозначены знаками, а разметка практически стерлась.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108847843
Константин Гам (2021-07-30 17:43:11+00:00): Данные должны быть ревалидируемы. Также как и стоянки, если они официальные, разметку должны обновлять раз в год. А если всё стёрлость, потерялось и не проверяемо, это просто меняет свой статус. Никто не мешает физически бросать авто на "области из асфальта".
iWowik (2021-08-02 07:13:32+00:00): Официальность парковок нигде в описании тега не фигурирует.
Use amenity=parking to tag a facility used by ... users for parking motor vehicles...

То есть только условие использования этого facility.
eburnett23 (2021-07-29 21:50:08+00:00): forgot to add #creditsuisse
BlueButterfly (2021-07-30 00:13:13+00:00): Also used Mapillary
TomPar (2021-09-22 16:31:03+00:00): It would seem most/all of these newly added trails in the WMNF are illegal.  Do you have any references to support a "bicycle=yes" tag?  Thanks.
chuyler1 (2021-09-22 17:18:06+00:00): The trails are part of the "Profile Trails" network sponsored by Franconia area NEMBA.  
https://www.nemba.org/trails/new-hampshire/profile-trail-network-franconia-inn-trails

The most updated map of the Profile Trails is below as the upper trail was part of a recent challenge event. 
https://www.tricyclenh.com/profile

Given how easy it is to get lost on these trails I made sure the OSM (and Open Cycle Map) were up to date.
Rogoyski (2021-09-16 17:50:11+00:00): Cześć, czy ja mam dobre wrażenie, że edytując drogi dla rowerów rysowałeś je od nowa, kasując dotychczasowe obiekty? Warto zachowywać stare obiekty: po pierwsze dla historii edycji, po drugie dla danych, jakie były dodane. Wydaje mi się, że razem ze starymi obiektami poszło np. do piachu trochę danych o przejściach dla pieszych (footway=crossing), które dodawałem.
syntex (2021-09-16 18:36:18+00:00): Faktycznie, dwa skasowałem niepotrzebnie. Ale widzę, że już je dodałeś ponownie.
Piteriuz (2021-07-30 21:47:13+00:00):  Pozostaje jeszcze przenieść sam dworzec w jego docelowe miejsce (pod szklany dach).
jleedev (2021-07-30 17:36:08+00:00): If these are steps, then they should be tagged with `highway=steps`.
DaveF (2023-03-20 21:27:09+00:00): Hi Could you fix/delete the multipolygon please. Multipolygon tags shouldn't be on a way.
thibautRe (2021-07-30 22:23:56+00:00): Hey Nick! Thank you for your contribution to OSM!

It looks like some of these roads you added are mostly farm-related roads that would be better tagged as "highway=track" rather than "highway=unclassified"

Unclassified roads according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa are meant to represent connections between settlments.

I have changed the roads to be "tracks" in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108912258 :)

Cheers!
Thibaut
compdude (2021-07-31 19:23:16+00:00): Hi there, none of those roads that you tagged as trunk actually meet the definition of a trunk road.  Trunk roads are generally any road that is a divided highway without interchanges or a two-lane road that connects major cities. The roads you tagged as trunk really should be tagged as service roads for the most part. I would really appreciate it if you fixed this.

Also, please actually provide a changeset comment to explain to other mappers what changes you've made to the map. This is way more helpful than just typing a period in the description box.
DuhC0mmunity (2021-08-01 17:17:16+00:00): I am kind of new to this, i mostly know just how to add roads and stuff, and i do allot of things in one changeset, i work on fixing things of multiple hours and just got tired of adding a changeset commet. also I will fix the roads to what i hope is correct.
literan (2021-07-30 16:57:16+00:00): зачем вы тут все сломали и сдвинули? откатываю.
AgusQui (2021-08-21 21:13:54+00:00): Un terreno ferroviario como este: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26509222 va con landuse=railway, que es precisamente lo que indica que es tal cosa. Si quieres indiacar el pasto debes mapearlo a parte con landuse=grass dónde corresponda. Por otro lado si no tiene un nombre en particular, no se pone nada.
AgusQui (2021-08-21 21:18:41+00:00): Por favor no pegues los objetos a las vías highway (calles), como hiciste con la plaza Giorello, ya que no coincide con la realidad, que es lo que hacemos en Openstreetmap.
ottwiz (2021-07-30 00:14:17+00:00): I deleted property lines from this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/13806774 because they only exist in govt documents, but not as a fence (in European countries mostly yes but in USA? that doesn't exist mostly)
nevw (2021-07-30 03:16:33+00:00): Hi
you can change the satellite imagery to Maxar and see a more recent view. Also remove the name tag if unknown.
nevw (2021-08-09 06:25:40+00:00): no response, updated map using more recent Maxar imagery.
Warin61 (2021-07-31 07:32:54+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. 

Administration boundaries (the PSMA sourced stuff) are not roads ... e.g. 
Way  851954026 and Way 851953079

Both have been tagged as roads .. these tags will be removed and the administration boundaries repaired. 

Note: these administration boundaries are a problem for all of us, it is not just you.
tastrax (2021-08-02 05:42:48+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ovruni (2021-10-16 01:11:23+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se han agregado barreras, se ha indicado como source=streetlevel imagery. En el conjunto de cambios 112524497 se dice que se ha utilizado Mapillary, sin embargo Mapillary no contiene imágenes para varias de las calles donde se han mapeado estas barreras.
mueschel (2021-08-05 08:06:30+00:00): Hi,
the ways of this MP still have two foreign tags - can they be removed?
    REV_DATE=2021-02-18
    YR_RECORD=1993
doug_sfba (2021-08-06 10:22:41+00:00): These tags were imported for several units of the Eel River Wildlife Area and the Headwaters Forest Reserve from California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife GIS files. I think they're self explanatory and helpful for future maintenance of these areas in OSM. But I've prefixed all these non-OSM tags with "cdfw:" (ie, "cdfw:REV_DATE", etc) for clarity.
iWowik (2021-07-31 04:46:09+00:00): День добрый!
Я уже ваше обращал внимание на ошибки вашего тегирования
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107170550

К сожалению, вы продолжаете их совершать по-прежнему.
mariotomo (2021-07-30 02:48:36+00:00): natural=tree: A single tree, sometimes lone or significant.
vorpalblade (2021-09-02 00:29:31+00:00): Hi there. It is nice to see someone else editing in this area using StreetComplete. It does look like you might have just been visiting, based off of your editing activity.

If you ever to edit using JOSM in the area, I *have* georeferenced all the major imagery providers using survey monuments in the imagery offset database.

And Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. 

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
rthik007 (2021-08-31 09:31:27+00:00): "hi surya rama,
while reviewing the data i observed that via node/way have been eliminated that were part in turn restrictions kindly recheck and resolve the issue.
RELATION: 10854006
changeset :108856213
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108852923
MxxCon (2021-08-01 00:05:02+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what is this change based on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108853786
termjam (2021-08-01 16:43:43+00:00): If you're looking for sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutchinson_River_Parkway#Exit_list

which derives its exit list from this NYSDOT document:
https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/pls/portal/MEXIS_APP.BC_CONST_NOTICE_ADMIN.VIEWFILE?p_file_id=29755&p_is_digital=Y
rthik007 (2021-08-31 09:32:56+00:00): "hi Husni Falah,
while reviewing the data i observed that via node/way have been eliminated that were part in turn restrictions kindly recheck and resolve the issue.
RELATION: 9754603
changeset :108856213
"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108856213
TreeTracks (2023-02-13 00:47:47+00:00): Hi CS, can you please check hole #4 on the western edge of Latrobe Golf Course. From the number sequence it looks like this should be #7. Cheers Ian
PlaneMad (2021-08-05 04:09:03+00:00): Hi nice work adding a lot of the SH9 road details. Since the highway is still a state highway with at grad crossings, it seems like it would not fit a definition of a motorway and should probably remain highway=primary.
Warin61 (2021-07-31 07:44:04+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03864&lat=-37.78672&zoom=16

Click on the blue/green lines to see the error.
ChonkerStonker (2021-08-01 05:24:13+00:00): fixed it. thanks
WoodWoseWulf (2021-07-30 07:58:31+00:00): Hi Tommy,

Not sure what you were trying to add here, but you dragged a few features out of place, and you seem to have added a personal bookmark.

If you need help adding something, feel free to reach out.
stefanct (2021-07-30 15:45:22+00:00): Hi,
maxspeed ist bei Wohnstraßen normalerweise implizit und sollte deshalb nicht extra gesetzt werden, wenn es nicht zusätzlich zur Wohnstraße ausgeschildert ist, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=en
LG
G_P_J (2021-07-30 09:27:01+00:00): Cześć, nadal wprowadzasz niepoprawne dane. Dla dróg powiatowych numer drogi powiatowej wprowadzony jest w znaczniku unsigned_ref. Nie należy powielać tego numeru w znaczniku ref. Twoje wcześniejsze zmiany zostały wycofane. Obecne również zostaną wycofane. Zapraszam do dyskusji nad Twoimi zmianami na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=836297#p836297
G_P_J (2021-07-30 10:08:45+00:00): Zmiany wycofane w: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108881423
literan (2021-07-30 16:51:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968684517/history#map=19/55.66018/37.19818 а точно ли тут through|through|right ?

разве не по этой кривой дорожке чуть западнее надо поворачивать направо?
Vascom (2021-07-30 17:03:18+00:00): Да, видимо сперва добавил, потом разрезал. Сейчас исправлю.
Glassman (2021-08-01 00:16:32+00:00): Question about the removal of the bus stops. Are they really gone? They were just updated in April.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108862150
fivefivethree (2021-08-01 03:49:47+00:00): The two in particular that I removed were because I personally saw them taking down the bus stops when I was at school in 2019, but if they were updated April 2021, I'll have to check again. The Everett Transit website also doesn't have any information on Route 5 as of July 2021. I'm in the area in a couple days, so I can check again. Also, is there a more proper way to delete bus stops?
Glassman (2021-08-01 05:22:13+00:00): You removed the bus stops correctly. I just picked up on it because they were recently touch and you are a new mapper. But removing if they are gone is good. 

One tip is when there is an address for a business, delete the business tags but keep the address. It will most likely be reused by the next business.
Glassman (2021-08-01 00:33:24+00:00): #TIP: To add a name to a bridge and not just a node, just use the tag bridge:name=EE90B.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108862181
Frans S (2021-10-09 10:17:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
You map often the shadow of a building as part of the building. 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108862354
Glassman (2021-08-01 00:24:09+00:00): #TIP: To add a bridge name, select the bridge then just use the tag bridge:name=Bridge EE 90A. That way the bridge name doesn't conflict with the road name. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108862377
Glassman (2021-08-01 00:20:16+00:00): #TIP: the tag building=yes should remain or building=prison. Can you add it back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108862623
fivefivethree (2021-08-01 03:43:57+00:00): no problem
Carnildo (2021-07-31 00:45:50+00:00): What sort of a thing is "Pandora"?  I'm pretty sure that "park" isn't the correct tag for it.
Glassman (2021-08-01 00:29:19+00:00): I'm confused why a railway crossing was added to a bridge. Typically we have railway=level_crossing for streets intersecting with rail lines and railway=crossing for pedestrian (sidewalks) crossing rails. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108863213
Mark Trail (2021-08-01 04:14:53+00:00): Seabury was a 3-level crossing in its heyday, with the Milwaukee Road steel bridge (now Palouse to Cascades Trail ) . Below the Milwaukee Road on wooden pilings was the Spokane & Inland Empire and later as freight running GN branchline, and abandonment after cutbacks following a merger (BN). On the bottom is the surface road, I think is now just a farmroad.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108863213
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-27 02:29:16+00:00): Hello bhar_gav..  your edit looks awesome, I'd like to inform that i found this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/474569735) has crossing issue with waterbody. Due to my lack of local knowledge in that area, can you help me to provide some information about that highway? is that highway that located on waterbody was a bridge, or maybe anything else? 

if you have any other suggestion please let me know.

Thank You for your understanding, Happy Mapping
iWowik (2021-07-31 04:49:10+00:00): День добрый!
При написании названий улиц соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятые соглашения.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать.
tastrax (2021-08-02 05:29:14+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
stefanct (2021-07-30 15:35:09+00:00): Hi,
"Zufahrt Tiefgarage" klingt nach einer Beschreibung statt einem Namen, den man so vor Ort als Bezeichnung finden kann. Das sollte dann auf keinen Fall als name getaggt werden. Was man hier stattdessen machen kann, um die entsprechende Information zu hinterlassen, ist dem Knoten, bei dem die Zufahrt ins Gebäude übergeht ein amenity=parking_entrance setzen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking_entrance).

Du hast außerdem die Krankenhausstraße  beim entsprechenden Punkt grob verschoben, dass da nun ein bisschen eine Schikane entstanden ist. :)

LG
samaerpr (2021-07-31 04:51:59+00:00): Korrigiert. Danke
user_11418917 (2021-09-23 17:15:56+00:00): Dear Chusovaya, I'm Iraqi and I lived my whole life almost 30 years in Iraq and never heard of this name before "جزيرة القطعة" I've been in Basra many many many times and never heard of this name! I also asked my Iraqi friends some of them are from Basra and they never heard of this name too. Are you sure of this name? what is your source? 
The offical name of this "island" is "شبه جزيرة الفاو" not "جزيرة القطعة" this is so wrong....
Chusovaya (2021-09-28 08:13:24+00:00): Hi lockdownguy, thanks for your suggestions here! I have used https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2479316298(please check history) as well as Global Islands Data (https://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/gie/) to add this information. I can see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197487794 representing the شبه جزيرة الفاو. I’m open to your suggestions as a local since you may have a better understanding here, let me know what you think!
user_11418917 (2021-09-29 04:03:19+00:00): Dear Chusovaya, Sorry for the late reply as I was so busy and I had to ask someone to ask officials in Basra. And even the officials never heard of "جزيرة القطعة" in Basra or even Iraq, the node you referred to is "bulk import" and most of this bulk import that happened in Iraq 8 years ago have lots and lots of inaccurate names and spam names too.        
I searched this on the internet and only found it in English website never in Iraqi or Arabic website.     
I suggest removing the relation (Al Qitah 13035770) since it's not familiar with the locals and residents of this country.            
Regards.
Chusovaya (2021-10-05 04:10:36+00:00): Hi lockdownguy, thank you for providing the local information about the island. I have removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13035770.
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 04:33:28+00:00): Dear Chusovaya, Thank you and keep up the good work.
user_3022894 (2021-07-30 11:20:31+00:00): Super, danke dir.

(Hatte sich auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2775141 bezogen).

Viele Grüße,
Lukas
OscarEchoAlpha (2021-07-30 07:35:04+00:00): Reversion of deletions made in changeset 108550295
ALu68 (2021-07-30 19:24:56+00:00): Hallo,

Bezüglich https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7528223441/history - 
die Sache mit der Werbung und dem Key:description hatte Mike doch schon mal erwähnt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85325475

Ganz oben steht: "Der Key description ist nicht für Werbebotschaften oder -slogans gedacht." und hier zum Nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de

Gruß. Andre
ALu68 (2021-07-30 19:43:16+00:00): Bei folgenden Einträgen ist das Format für opening_hours fehlerhaft
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7528243348/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7528196033/history

Für die Wochentage werden die ersten beiden Buchstaben der Wochentage der englischen Sprache verwendet

user_5359 hatte deine früheren  fehlerhaften Eintagungen bereits in Version 3 / 4 korrigiert: "Mo-Fr 09:00-12:00, Mo-Th 13:00-17:00"

Das Gleiche gilt für die neuen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8962319752 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8962319751

Siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
ALu68 (2021-07-30 20:23:03+00:00): Beim key office wird kein Freitext als Tag verwendet: "ernährungsberatung_für_säuglinge_und_kleinkinder" & " 	personal_trainer,_ernährungsberater" - hier werden Werte in Englisch verwendet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office?uselang=de

Für die Sicherheitsfirma gibt es bereits office=security https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dsecurity
HeiKue (2025-08-11 06:54:53+00:00): Hallo gsperb, warum hast Du name=Würzburger Straße entfernt? Quelle dafür? Laut Bayernatlas hat die Straße durchgängig diesen Namen. https://v.bayern.de/TMm89 Grüße aus FÜ