piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Chris Fleming (2018-08-13 14:34:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap and editing the map.

We don't always map Airbnb as they are not usually signposted and therefore can't easily be verified on the ground. In this case, however it would be great to get some more details at very least such as the full address and also get the point located more accuratly if possible?

Please let me know if you have any questions.
watmildon (2024-01-19 00:24:18+00:00): The water park here looks great. Nice work!
alphensebezorger (2018-08-19 21:54:24+00:00): Hallo Leo,
ik kan me niet voorstellen dat de openbare bibliotheek van Bergen op Zoom definitief gesloten is. De precieze locatie weet ik ook niet, maar een van de gebouwen daar is het toch echt. Misschien is de opmerking (via Maps-me, vaak onbetrouwbaar) ontstaan door een gesloten poort tijdens een vakantiesluiting of iets dergelijks? Verwijderen van OSM lijkt me voorbarig.
Met vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
Leo Slager (2018-08-19 22:54:39+00:00): Hallo Alphensebezorger,
Tja, meer controle en argwaan van mijn kant was wel nodig.
De feitelijke opmerking was wel juist: op die locatie is de bibliotheek niet meer gehuisvest. Verhuisd naar Korte Meestraat 17.
Staat nu weer op de kaart.
Bedankt voor de waarschuwing.
Wulfmorn (2018-10-13 09:30:11+00:00): Hello. It seems you have added an unusual tag value (lit=1) to the roundabout at Via Jacopo Facciolati.
voschix (2018-10-13 20:49:13+00:00): Thanks - corrected
user_5359 (2018-08-13 18:06:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
abakus_uploader (2018-08-13 22:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-08-13 13:41:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Matthew Darwin (2018-09-17 18:35:36+00:00): Hi,

The postal code seems incorrect here.  Could you check?
meekvarriano (2018-09-17 21:19:21+00:00): Fixed! Updated based on business card, and confirmed via info of their website
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 11:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61654332 where the changeset comment is: wiederholte Vandalismus-Edits von GuentherSpeicher zurückgesetzt; keine Reaktion des Users auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60939866
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 11:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61654332 where the changeset comment is: wiederholte Vandalismus-Edits von GuentherSpeicher zurückgesetzt; keine Reaktion des Users auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60939866
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 11:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61654332 where the changeset comment is: wiederholte Vandalismus-Edits von GuentherSpeicher zurückgesetzt; keine Reaktion des Users auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60939866
MrMoehritz (2018-08-14 17:55:36+00:00): nice! Have a nice holiday nad happy mapping :-)
*Martin* (2018-08-14 08:23:20+00:00): A ake zvlastne oznacenie ma, ze "XXXX" :-)
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 11:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61654332 where the changeset comment is: wiederholte Vandalismus-Edits von GuentherSpeicher zurückgesetzt; keine Reaktion des Users auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60939866
Chris Fleming (2018-08-13 22:51:42+00:00): Cheers Sam - thanks for spotting the vandalism and signing up for an account to fix this!
DD1GJ (2018-08-14 06:12:14+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=710877#p710877

Hallo GuentherSpeicher, über manche Parks lässt sich streiten, aber hier allenfalls über den Teil nördlich des Schwedendamms. Auf dem Luftbild ist eindeutig ein Park zu erkennen und die Bushaltestelle ist auch danach benannt. Wieso soll dies kein Park sein?
gabro00 (2018-08-13 18:20:38+00:00): highway=speed_camera  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=speed_camera
abakus_uploader (2018-08-13 22:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-08-13 17:18:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет магазин (если верить описанию: description=Магазин спортивных товаров).  
Но эта точка не содержит тега магазина shop=*. Вероятно, это ошибка.
MyrikLD (2018-08-17 14:59:41+00:00): Спасибо за поправку, изменения внесены в код, завтра должно исправиться
abakus_uploader (2018-08-13 22:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-08-13 14:40:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kocio (2018-08-19 05:08:53+00:00): Hi,

Why did you change the name of Gulf of Bothnia? It's a gulf laying between Sweden and Finland, not some English speaking countries, so the name should reflect it in my opinion.
pangoSE (2018-08-21 19:40:05+00:00): I agree. SV - FI or FI - SV name would be fine.
pangoSE (2018-08-21 19:43:15+00:00): Additionally I think this multipolygon should be deleted and replaced by a point. It has 1600+ members but this does not add any value, the fact that "Gulf of Bothnia" encompasses both the bothnian bay, kvarken and bothnian sea could be turned into a description.
kocio (2018-08-21 19:49:21+00:00): In my opinion turning a point into an area was adding value, and that's why I did it. It's much closer to reality than a (more or less) random point somewhere inside.
eggie (2018-09-05 13:17:05+00:00): Ahh.. in Duitsland begonnen met editten en daarom geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
JJIglesias (2018-08-13 17:32:42+00:00): CUIDADO AL EDITAR. Cambiastes locamente las calles Giovanni Boccacio y Willam Shakespeare. Debes revisar bien que estas haciendo antes de Salvar. Caso contrario todo cambio que hagas sera borrado si no respetas las reglas de edicion. Gracias
favor leer: 
http://learnosm.org/es/
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61662723 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, abusive - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2185].
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61662723 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, abusive - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2185].
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61662723 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, abusive - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2185].
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61662723 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, abusive - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2185].
乌克兰移民 (2018-08-13 14:57:58+00:00): また、水のポリゴンを作成しました
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61662723 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, abusive - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2185].
scratera (2018-08-14 11:18:34+00:00): ...non volermene ma praticamente in italia non esiste la tipologia di strada living street...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=it
jlevente (2018-08-29 13:25:00+00:00): a kikotore visszaraktam egy waterway=riverbank taget mert a leisure=marina nem feltetlenul jelent vizfeluletet. kesobb majd nem artana feldarabolni a vonalakat meg atnezni a relationoket is, mert jelenleg itt is eleg nagy a redundancia. pl https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104790157#map=17/46.25352/20.19356&layers=H es https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30432488#map=15/46.2533/20.2008&layers=H a Tisza jobb partjan siman atfedik egymast. egyelore ezeket nem bantottam
Tejes (2018-08-29 14:29:06+00:00): Teljesen jogos, köszönöm a javítást.
Carto'Cité (2018-09-10 09:19:42+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,
Merci pour ta contribution concernant la piste cyclable le long de la rue Pierre Nicole. Je me permets quelques remarques pour améliorer le résultat : j'ai raccordé la piste à la route dans la partie nord-ouest à l'aide des photos Mapillary et à l'autre extrémité, je n'ai pas d'information fiable alors j'ai imaginé ; n'hésite pas à corriger si je me suis trompé. Tout ça pour dire que la piste est encore plus intéressante maintenant qu'elle est raccordée au reste du réseau. Sinon la piste était collée à l'occupation du sol ce qu'il vaut mieux éviter.
Encore merci.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Leo Slager (2018-08-13 18:58:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
kartonage (2018-08-15 08:26:14+00:00): Hi meppi,

Ich war vorgestern in der Nähe und habe hier kurz vorbeigeschaut. Allerdings konnte ich überhaupt keine Anzeichen finden, dass die Vermietung hier noch existiert. Hast du das nur anhand des Hinweises versetzt oder vor Ort überprüft?

Schöne Grüße
rneppi (2018-08-15 08:50:17+00:00): Hallo kartonage,
ich wohne in der Gegend und kann daher mit Sicherheit sagen, dass wenn die Oldtimerermietung noch existend ist, sie auf keinen Fall in der Nummer 81 angesiedelt ist, sondern in der Nummer 87. Das steht auch in der Knotenbeschreibung unten. Oder ist das schon aufgrund meiner Änderung geändert? Die Webseite der Vermietung wird mir zwar nicht angezeigt, aber andere Suchmaschinenergebnisse weisen ebenfalls auf die Nummer 87.
Grüße zurück
kartonage (2018-08-15 11:24:10+00:00): Alles klar. Ich wollte nur nochmal sicher gehen, die Änderung war rein technisch ja richtig so. Hatte mich nur gewundert. :)
GinaroZ (2018-08-13 21:48:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for changing Doune Churchyard from a park to a cemetery. However be aware that there is a difference in the tagging between Churchyard and Cemetery - if there is a place of worship then it should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=grave%20yard
aseerel4c26 (2018-08-14 05:46:38+00:00): Hi Jochen, was ist denn deine Reviewbitte? :-) Hast du dich verklickt?

Ich kann allerdings keinen Node mit landuse= in der alten Relationsversion finden, hmm...
JochenOSM (2018-08-14 06:59:15+00:00): Hallo, da ich bei Relationen noch ganz am Anfang der Lernkurve stehe bitte nachschauen ob ich etwas kaputt gemacht habe ;) Der entfernte Node hatte die ID 446073850 und ich bin davon ausgegangen dass der nur versehentlich enthalten war.
aseerel4c26 (2018-08-15 06:31:11+00:00): Ah, jetzt hab ich es verstanden. Tatsächlich hat der von dir entfernte Node nicht selbst "landuse=*", sondern die Ways, deren Teil er ist.

Ja, dieser Node ergibt in einer Wanderroute keinen Sinn (zumindest nicht ohne "Rolle" - die es hier nicht gab). Da hatte sich Regenpfeiffer wohl nur verklickt bei der Objektauswahl. Danke fürs Entfernen!

Ich habe den Elementen mal Rollen (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members ) verpasst - dann ist deutlicher, für was die überhaupt enthalten sind. Bei dem einem Way für den Pavillon ist es gar nötig - sonst wäre dieser Way als Routenelement anzusehen ... also wo man drüberlaufen soll. Node 297937852 habe ich entfernt - ein Straßenkreuzungspunkt, ich sehe keinen Sinn dahinter. 

Zudem habe ich die Elemente sortiert, sodass die Ways der großen Runde aufeinander folgen.

Bei Node 44633577 bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob er hineingehört. Ich dachte, der Rotweinwanderweg eine andere - wenn auch verwandte Route.
JochenOSM (2018-08-15 13:34:15+00:00): Aha, jetzt ist es ein bisschen transparenter (aber immer noch komplex :o) Danke für's Review!
aseerel4c26 (2018-08-15 17:49:56+00:00): http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=178079 ist übrigens oft sehr hilfreich bei Routen-Relationen. "In mehrere Teilgraphen getrennt" zeigt es an, weil es halt nicht versteht, dass der Pavillon nicht zur Wanderroute im engeren Sinne gehört.
gileri (2018-08-13 21:08:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Tag contact:street à corriger.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-14 06:40:05+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est corrigé
ivanbranco (2021-12-28 09:01:06+00:00): Hi Wilmer,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5829878544

there's an invalid place value here, can you check it out please?
Wilmer Osario (2021-12-28 22:02:09+00:00): Thanks for warning me. Is:

name=La Palmita
place=locality
ivanbranco (2022-01-03 19:20:31+00:00): Thank you Wilmer, I fixed this one. But I found another seven nodes with invalid place values, can you check this as well so we fix them all?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eKg
OverQuantum (2018-08-20 18:47:09+00:00): Вы сломали кучу отношений и геометрий данной правкой и несколькими другими. Не делайте так больше, пожалуйста.
Warin61 (2018-10-10 03:51:08+00:00): Hi,

Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
Cd_spb (2018-08-20 15:55:08+00:00): Заменил на 
construction=service
highway=construction
и т.п.
DemoLogin (2018-08-20 18:19:56+00:00): Верно. Спасибо :)
Parzelle13 (2018-10-29 06:01:47+00:00): Ist diese Darstellung in der Standardkarte so beabsichtigt?
FvGordon (2018-10-29 23:18:56+00:00): Das Klettergebiet nahe Nideggen hatte ich damals als inner-Rolle angelegt - nun aber aus der Relation entfernt und der Wald ist wieder da.
Parzelle13 (2018-10-29 23:24:26+00:00): o.k. Danke für die Rückmeldung
viloan (2018-08-13 15:53:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JJIglesias (2018-08-13 17:28:14+00:00): CUIDADO AL EDITAR. Cambiastes locamente las calles Giovanni Boccacio y Willam Shakespeare. Debes revisar bien que estas haciendo antes de Salvar. Caso contrario todo cambio que hagas sera borrado si no respetas las reglas de edicion. Gracias
favor leer:
http://learnosm.org/es/
jmapb (2018-08-13 17:26:21+00:00): There are dozens of these around Brooklyn and Queens, all added by homeslice60148 and tagged with #maproulette and #Long_Island_traffic_lights_(Brooklyn,_Queens) 

Aside from the facts that 1) they're generally not in places where sidewalk mapping makes any difference to pedestrian routing, and 2) they're left unconnected on the ends, so they're actively problematic for routing... they seem really well done. So I've left them alone, figuring it's a work in progress, and I've never tried to contact the mapper.

Do you think these should all be purged?

I have no experience with maproulette, but is this something that can be fixed or prevented from that end?
TheBestIdea (2018-08-14 14:52:35+00:00): My personal preference is that, in NYC where sidewalks are the norm, if they just follow the geometry of the road, they should be mapped as an attribute of the road with the "sidewalk=" key and not as a separate way.   
When they're disconnected at the ends so that they actively impede routing, I usually remove them. I don't know anything about maproulette either.
bhousel (2018-08-14 15:57:10+00:00): It would be great if, rather than removing the sidewalks, you would just connect them to the road where crossings exist.  It's not a matter of "personal preference" - there are groups working on wheelchair routing that need to map attributes on the sidewalk ways (like smoothness and obstacles) which would be too cumbersome to add as attributes on the vehicular road.  Thanks!
TheBestIdea (2018-08-14 16:14:54+00:00): There appears to be a robust debate about whether sidewalks should be separate ways: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way If people want to take to time to do so, I'm not going to stop them, but they should do it in a way that does not impede routing for other users. It is also legal for pedestrians to cross the street mid-block in many places in NYC (any block there is not stoplight at both ends) and "just connect them to the road where crossings exist" fails to account for that.
bhousel (2018-08-14 16:35:07+00:00): Yes, I'm aware of the wiki page.  Again, the primary usecase for this style of mapping is for wheelchair users who can not cross the street mid-block.  It does not impede routing for other users (I'm not sure why some people think this).
jmapb (2018-08-14 17:01:03+00:00): None of these #maproulette #Long_Island_traffic_lights_(Brooklyn,_Queens) sidewalks have any wheelchair or smoothness info. I've actually never seen any such info on sidewalks here. (I have seen sloped_curb=yes on some *road* intersections, but that's obsolete now.) Yes, it might be added someday, but it might be added someday via sidewalk:* tags on the road as well -- that's the very first example given in the Sidewalks wiki page. Doesn't seem "too cumbersome." Regardless, the state these are being left in is an active impediment to both pedestrian and wheelchair routing. It can't really be justified by saying "maybe someday someone will want to add wheelchair tags."
jmapb (2018-08-14 17:02:28+00:00): Personally I only map sidewalks when I perceive that it would improve routing, but I can easily imagine that at some point in the future mapping every sidewalk will be the norm. I'm not inclined to fight against this -- but I do want people to map responsibly, so that the map isn't less useful after their contributions than it was before. Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way needs some good idea/bad idea examples for how to tie mapped sidewalks into the existing street grid.
jmapb (2018-08-14 17:11:10+00:00): BTW here is a very silly example of screwed up pedestrian routing. (Wheelchair routing would have the same problem, I believe.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=40.60721%2C-74.01134%3B40.60740%2C-74.01154#map=19/40.60770/-74.01090&layers=N
bhousel (2018-08-14 17:14:17+00:00): jmapb, please leave me alone.  If you need help adding a crosswalk to fix that routing issue, ask on help.openstreetmap.org
jmapb (2018-08-14 17:18:00+00:00): These comments are not a personal attack and your defensiveness is uncalled for. I'm discussing the changeset. If you don't want to part of the changeset discussion, hit the "unsubscribe" button.
MikeN (2018-08-14 19:15:01+00:00): I've observed new mappers drawing these types of sidewalks without crossings because they appear to 'stop at the curb'.  They're just entering an observation.   I'd see it as a work in progress, and not usable for navigation on its own until the network has been fully entered..
A community might decide to map sidewalks integrated with streets or separate ways, but if they're watching closely, they can advise new mappers of the preferred method.