piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jolesh (2023-04-08 21:04:56+00:00): Hej Tarcizio.
Great that you contribute with your local knowledge. :)
We use so called tags to describe objects. So instead of writing in the name field what this building is we would add the tag "amenity=police". With the iD editor you can simply select police instead of building.
This is similar to what I did with the post office: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096292019

If you have questions feel free to contact me.

Thanks for your contribution :)
Best regards, Jolesh

If you want to learn more:
About police stations:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpolice
About tagging of all different kinds of things:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
RicoElectrico (2022-09-20 12:38:58+00:00): Cześć, przy Twojej edycji zniknęła informacja jaki to sklep: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/27332880

To jest nadal supermarket?
resetcom (2022-09-20 12:42:50+00:00): Cześć, tak, to jest supermarket: FRAC Sieć Polskich Sklepów Spożywczych
RicoElectrico (2022-09-20 13:04:50+00:00): Dzięki, poprawione.
resetcom (2022-09-20 13:24:43+00:00): OK, dzięki
Warin61 (2022-09-21 00:59:18+00:00): Past messages about errors have been ignored, this one will probably be the same? 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99623&lat=-32.03919&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The building way self intersects ... you should fix this. 

Note: The iD reported warnings of "crossing highway/waterway" and "impossible one way highway" are worth investigating.
Warin61 (2022-09-21 02:19:01+00:00): I have used JOSM validator to further  check this changeset:

Highways crossing barrier fences ... 4 in this changeset but others also evident from past entries. These need to have the  barriers removed from the highway .. or some gated entry provided. Barrier Way: 1096276941, Way: 1096276939 and Way: 1096276960.

Highway Way: 1096276958 connected to building, Way: 1096276959
trial (2023-05-04 16:39:18+00:00): Hi Malcolm, please don't remove tags without asking if they are correct or not.
Layft Greater (2022-10-06 11:37:33+00:00): Lido was mapped incorrectly. Here is the correct location https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3878784914

"O'Brians" location is also questionable
flohoff (2022-09-20 12:24:46+00:00): 
Moin,
ich hätte die alte adresse nicht gelöscht sondern als "node" an die Straße gelegt. 

Denn vielleicht sucht morgen noch einer nach der Hausnummer 4 und will da hin navigieren. 

Adressen sind ja eher immer ein "superset" - Wir wollen das ja alles mögliche gefunden wird. Und die neue Nr 8 hätte ich auch gleich daneben gelegt falle jemand schon nach der neuen sucht.

Die alte kann man dann irgendwann mal löschen in 1-2 Jahren wenn die "ausser mode" gekommen ist.

So von der idee.

Flo
Frans S (2022-09-21 08:46:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually. 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
This comment concern also other changeset on this project. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126420485
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 15:53:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039407823/history has reference = E7982 that was added in this edit
maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit?

ref= is widely used for references
JeanMappe (2025-12-06 01:53:44+00:00): Hi, my bad. It's fixed now, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175570120
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-06 09:33:54+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
redrace (2022-09-20 14:47:03+00:00): HUHU
Ich hab mir das heute mal angesehen und von Osten bis Am Schießendahl  einen Track G1 daraus gemacht. Das ist defenitiv zu breit für einen Pfad. Nur danach habe ich nicht genau darauf geachtet ob der breit genug für einen Track ist, als zwei Räder nebeneinander. 
Gruß Meik
redrace (2022-09-20 14:48:39+00:00): Ich habe eben auf den Sat-Bildern gesehen, dass dort Poller sind also mache ich auch daraus einen Track. :-)
AhegaHOE (2022-09-20 16:45:01+00:00): Super und auf dem Track können zwei Bikes definitiv nebeneinander fahren.
hendrik-17 (2022-09-20 12:19:47+00:00): source=Bing
Frans S (2022-09-20 14:31:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I reviewed your mappings and have to point to a few issues.
You map multiple buildings as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually.
Within the residential area in the center of this task, a lot of buildings still need to be mapped.
In 1 occasion you connected a node of a building to a highway. This gives an error.
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
martien-176 (2022-09-21 18:10:16+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126420924
Aarogya Pandey (2023-12-07 08:11:59+00:00): Thank you.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-01 13:26:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please use the MAXAR imagery as mentioned in the description.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126421327
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:56:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126421371
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Mevess (2022-09-20 12:33:19+00:00): ajout d'une foret plutôt
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Jillis inactivE (2022-09-25 16:59:11+00:00): Ajb de source tags niet aanpassen volgende keer.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
bkil (2022-09-20 17:36:14+00:00): I would like to ask why they don't mention this on the website? https://janikovszky.net/
bkil (2022-09-20 17:39:51+00:00): We also welcome you on are next online gathering and chat https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20220923
BaluB (2022-09-20 18:14:03+00:00): Because this is a different school. Their website is: https://ulloiiskola.hu/
The old name was "Üllői Úti Magyar-Angol
Két Tanítási Nyelvű
Általános Iskola" and the current name is "Kőbányai Csukás István Magyar-Angol Két Tanítási Nyelvű Általános Iskola".

The Janikovszky is at address of 
Budapest, Kápolna tér 4, 1103 and this is the Budapest, Üllői út 118, 1101.
bkil (2022-09-20 18:33:54+00:00): Okay, thank you for the elaboration. Could you perhaps add some further information for the POI, such as its website? :-)
FraukeLeo (2022-12-02 08:39:40+00:00): Hallo ntamaran, Way 386625265 ist KEINE Einbahnstraße. Das ist in Gegenrichtung die Einfädelspur für die Linksabbieger, die von der Autobahn kommen und nach Südwest wollen. Schaus dir vor Ort an.
FraukeLeo (2022-12-02 08:42:16+00:00): Das gleiche gilt für die Fortsetzung, das ist Linksabbiegerspur für die, die von Nordost kommen und auf die Autobahn wollen. Die Kreuzung ist komisch gebaut, mit der baulichen Trennung an der durchgehenden Geradeausspur, deshalb muss das in OSM so sein.
FraukeLeo (2022-12-02 08:54:12+00:00): (Dummerweise hatte Magic Earth gestern ein Kartenupdate, da ist dein Fehler jetzt für einige Monate drin, so dass Magic Earth jetzt erst rechts abbiegt und im nächsten Kreisel wendet.)
FraukeLeo (2022-12-02 08:55:53+00:00): siehe https://imgur.com/oOiS5yQ :)
ntamaran (2022-12-06 08:44:28+00:00): Hi,Please accept my apologies for the delay in response. Thank you for looking into the change set and making the edit. Your insights are much valuable for us. Looking forward to learn more.
Regards,
ntamaran
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
b-holdet (2023-01-22 17:25:27+00:00): Hvor har du navnet "Vintønden" fra?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096192278
osmviborg (2023-01-22 20:09:22+00:00): https://naturstyrelsen.dk/naturoplevelser/naturguider/hjermind-skov-kjaellinghoel/sevaerdigheder/
b-holdet (2023-01-22 20:15:52+00:00): Mange tak. 
Det må kunne skrives lidt mere tydelige i changesættet, hvor data kommer fra.
Navnet ser ud til at være lokalt forankret udfra teksten.
kortgodt (2023-01-22 22:01:47+00:00): https://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/89789/Hjermind_261113_Web.pdf
Piskvor (2022-09-21 13:19:56+00:00): Takhle se to opravdu jmenuje v terénu?
BPTT (2024-02-29 16:41:25+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for adding bike lane data! I've seen your work in several other cities, and it's much appreciated. But please retain/add "cycleway=lane" and/or "cycleway:left/right=lane" in addition to "cycleway:both=lane" because OpenCycleMap cannot render "cycleway:both=lane" yet. Which is a major shortcoming! CyclOSM, however, can render all three.
pkoby (2024-02-29 18:16:57+00:00): Gotcha! I didn't realize that was a fault with OCM. I'll edit my presets moving forward. At least it's an easy OverpassTurbo query and fix.
Hungerburg (2022-09-25 23:26:09+00:00): Ich mag den Pächter auch nicht, aber die Enzianhütte hat Übernachtungsmöglichkeit.
Hungerburg (2022-09-26 08:01:28+00:00): Hmm, nachgeschaut auf deren Homepage, anscheinend war das zwar geplant, laut Gespräche mit Seniorpächter, aber draus geworden ist scheints nichts.
eggie (2022-09-20 16:05:56+00:00): name=	Kikerbloem?

Spelfout?
Aangepast. Laat maar weten of dat correct is.
MVG
eggie
Achtenvijftig (2022-09-20 16:31:00+00:00): Kikerbloem stond op de plattegrond van het park, geen idee wat ze op het bordje hebben gezet zal eens kijken maar de juiste spelling zal inderdaad wel bedoeld zijn.
eggie (2022-09-20 16:42:23+00:00): Up to you 😀
Voor hetzelfde geld heb ik het verkeerd aangepast.. maar ik vermoed dat er een typfout in de plattegrond zit.
Groet
Eggie
Achtenvijftig (2022-09-20 17:00:50+00:00): Ja je hebt gelijk en ze hebben het op het bordje goed gespeld.
eggie (2022-09-20 17:21:20+00:00): 👍
Dawid2849 (2022-09-24 14:09:56+00:00): Cześć. W źródle adresu, którego nie zmieniłeś (https://ulanow.e-mapa.net), dla tego budynki dalej widnieje adres Zadąbrowa 8, a ul. Krzeszowska wg. tego źródła w ogóle nie istnieje w tej miejscowości (istnieje w sąsiedniej miejscowości Zarzecze). Czy mógłbyś podać źródło swoich zmian?
Robalowy (2022-09-24 16:25:11+00:00): Hej jeżdżę jako kurier i na bierzaco zmieniam adresy i nr zmiana na 100% jest poprawna
mavl (2022-11-23 15:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129286500 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping, the trash data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6558].
hauke-stieler (2023-03-03 21:10:28+00:00): Moin,

bist du dir sicher, dass die Hermann-Löns-Straße nur noch ein Radweg ist? Zum einen ist da schon ein Radweg eingetragen [0] zum anderen sind jetzt alle Gebäude samt der Schule mit dem Auto nicht erreichbar, was sehr ungewöhnlich wäre und unrealistisch klingt.

Wäre super, wenn du das nochmal prüfen und ggf. korrigieren könntest.

Grüße
Hauke

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656151052
Rene_93 (2023-03-04 14:12:47+00:00): Moin,

Ja die Straße ist mittlerweile eine reine Fahrradstraße. Diese ist auch mit den entsprechenden schildern kenntlich gemacht. Das einzigste ist, dass Anlieger frei sind. 

Gruß René
hauke-stieler (2023-03-05 12:06:18+00:00): Ah, verstehe. Dann ist das so nicht richtig eingetragen.

Fahrradstraßen sind in OSM ganz normale Straßen, aber mit dem "bicycle_road=yes" tag. Wenn man "highway=cycleway" setzt, dürfen da gar keine Autos mehr lang, was aber ja nicht der Fall ist, Anlieger dürfen da ja hin.

Hier wäre also wahrscheinlich folgende Tag-Kombination korrekt:

highway=residential
bicycle_road=yes
motor_vehicle=destination

Letzterer für das "Anlieger frei", da Radfahrer ja offensichtlich hier lang dürfen und nur motorisierter Verkehr eingeschränkt ist. Wenn auch tatsächlich der Radverkehr mit dem "Anlieger frei" eingeschränkt ist, dann gilt "vehicle=destination".

Schau am besten hier nach, welche Schild-Kombination vor Ort zu welchen Tags führt: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1020-30 (der "traffic_sign" tag ist aber nicht so wichtig, wen kannst du auch weg lassen).

Grüße
Hauke
Hungerburg (2022-09-25 23:30:10+00:00): Die Peishütte heißt zwar Hütte, aber cabin ist das keine.
rohieb (2022-09-26 12:09:32+00:00): Oh, das stimmt wohl. Habs in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126653303 geändert.
felipeeugenio (2022-09-20 19:00:56+00:00): Estimado, por favor no unir calles a landuses o areas naturales. Es simplemente equivocado. dejarlas todo lo cerca que quiera, pero no están juntas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126423255
felipeeugenio (2022-09-20 19:01:59+00:00): Tuve que despegar algunos, pero está ok. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126423255
eggie (2022-09-20 16:10:02+00:00): Beste 58  Neem svp de moeite je edits concreet te beschrijven.
name=winkel ?   Gebruik geen name=  als je iets wilt beschrijven of de winkel moet 'winkel' heten.
He je de pcknicktafel per abuis ergens anders gezet?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126423266

MVG
eggie
Achtenvijftig (2022-09-20 16:34:19+00:00): De picknicktafel is bewust verplaats. De oorspronkelijke plek is een onkruid oerwoud en verderop langs dat pad staat er een dus heb ik 'm maar verplaatst.
Verder denk ik dat de winkel inderdaad winkel heet. Zo gaat dat als er maar 1 is op het park ;-)
eggie (2022-09-20 16:43:14+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk... veel.plezier met mappen.

Gr eggie
Hungerburg (2022-09-25 23:28:46+00:00): Restaurant und Gebäude sind nicht Eins.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 00:24:03+00:00): To quote from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 

"Examples of bad situations (...) Mapping hotel and restaurant within hotel as one object, with tourism=hotel and amenity=restaurant on one node or area. It is causing problems as soon as any more detailed tags such as opening_hours=* would be added"

Disclaimer: I think I added this example recently there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 00:24:47+00:00): Wait, from copy paste. I wanted to use "Shop in a building mapped as a single object with building=* and shop=* and name=* (which will often apply only to POI). This one is more debatable, and many mappers consider it as a valid tagging."
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 00:25:47+00:00): BTW, this edit is being discussed at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/good-practice-one-feature-one-osm-element/3040/3
Hungerburg (2022-09-26 08:30:09+00:00): I did overreact; The changeset comment is quite bold though. One might consider the restaurant redundant, as alpine_hut includes alimentation.
rohieb (2022-09-26 11:48:49+00:00): Thanks for the pointer to the separate discussion. I was of the impression that the alpine hut and the restaurant described the same item, but if the restaurant has a different owner, then the principle I cited doesn't apply here. I will revert this edit, and be more careful in the future when working without local knowledge.
rohieb (2022-09-26 11:58:28+00:00): Wait. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/524217582/history already had both amenity=restaurant and tourism=alpine_hut, but you're saying the two should be different POIs because they have different owners/are different companies?
Hungerburg (2022-09-26 18:12:20+00:00): Not certain anymore, if alpine_hut is even correct here. It certainly is not a "Schutzhütte". All the other restaurants (except Enzianhütte) you removed the alpine_hut tag and moved the restaurant from a node inside to the outline of the building are true alps (Almhütten) that serve food in addition to tending livestock, while only the Höttinger offers accommodation. This is very literal and selective reading of the definition, to only ask, are there beds. E.g. it must be remote too, I read there, no road, etc.
rohieb (2022-09-26 19:36:48+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=alpine%20hut?uselang=en: 
"An alpine hut is a remote building located in the mountains intended to provide board and lodging. […] Required properties:
• Remote building found in mountains (not only the Alps) [obviously the case here]
• The access is usually restricted to foot, mountain bike or ski. [also given here]
• You will find food, shelter and sleeping places"

As for the last part, I was planning a possible multi-day hiking tour, and tried to find out which of these huts were offering accomodation. For the ones that I changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126422988, I didn't find anything in that regard mentioned on their homepage or on the karwendel.de list (which listed them explicitely as "only restaurant, no accomodation"). The only exception was Höttinger Alm, which was listed on karwendel.de as "offers accomodation", but had a note on their homepage that they are not offering accomodation in 2022, which I read as an exception due to Covid, and that they were normally offering accomodation. So I left the tourism=alpine_hut in place, as well as the amenity=restaurant.
rohieb (2022-09-26 19:39:33+00:00): I don't mind the amenity=restaurant in addition to alpine_hut, as long as you can just go there and get served without having to book a bed.

What you meant by "Schutzhütte" is probably covered by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut ?
Hungerburg (2022-09-26 20:25:03+00:00): I meant https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzh%C3%BCtte#%C3%96sterreich

Höttinger Alm is not remote ;) The tenant will leave this year, we will see what the next one offers.
rohieb (2022-09-26 20:45:08+00:00): Okay. However that legal definition doesn't say anything about accomodation.
maikeljeferei202 (2022-10-03 17:05:51+00:00): Jeni Kota/Town
Bukan Desa
maikeljeferei202 (2022-10-07 20:17:02+00:00): Kota
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 17:46:34+00:00): Ciao questo changeset ha qualche problema...