piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2017-03-20 10:04:39+00:00): Hallo  Morpheus0209,
ich kann mir nicht recht vorstellen, daß die von Dir eingetragene Bank (gem. Luftbild)  in einer Wiese steht.
Überprüfst Du den Standort noch mal ?
Grüße
Morpheus0209 (2017-03-20 10:31:19+00:00): Hallo PT-53 da es sich nich schlicht um eine Wiese sonder um einen Hügel handelt an dessen Spitze ein schöner Baum steht under diesem sich diese Bank befindet und das mein Lieblings Platz ist brauche ich den Eintrag nicht überprüfen schau doch mal live vorbei es lohnt sich mit einem wunderschönen Blick über unser Mühlental.
Liebe Grüße
PT-53 (2017-03-21 08:21:36+00:00): Dann ist ja alles o.K.
Noch viel Spaß und Erfolg mit OSM
Grüße
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:12:17+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Maciej9 (2017-04-21 11:47:30+00:00): Hi, I wonder why did you set maxspeed=50 on Bobrzyńskiego, while for many sections it has max speed 70 indicated by road sign.
Dmytro O (2017-04-21 13:52:33+00:00): Hi Macej. Thank you for question. For some pieces it is set to 50. I went by this road and recorded video. Speed is set correctly, unless something was changed sine last month.
Maciej9 (2017-04-21 17:19:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for response. However, nothing changed since last month and there are many sections with 70 speed limit.
Dmytro O (2017-04-21 18:51:30+00:00): OK. Here is the map of that street: http://imgur.com/a/LCyoy

Which segment should have 70km/h limit?
Dmytro O (2017-04-21 18:52:34+00:00): Orange is 50. Red is 70
Maciej9 (2017-04-21 22:11:20+00:00): There are more, but I can't tell exactly which from my memory. Just wanted to draw your attention, but if you don't know how to fix this, I will fix this later.
Dmytro O (2017-04-22 02:04:11+00:00): Fix what? All changes were made according to recorded video I've made month ago. Please check first, then complain.
Maciej9 (2017-04-24 18:33:56+00:00): If I was not sure, I would not complain. I surveyed it today and confirmed that section beyond i/c with Zachodnia street has also 70, as there is no sign there and i/c with internal road (non-public) does not cancel previous speed limit sign.
Dmytro O (2017-04-24 19:31:26+00:00): Which node you mean?
Dmytro O (2017-04-24 20:10:36+00:00): As far as I remember, I changed only there where speed limit was set explicitly by road signs.
Maciej9 (2017-04-24 22:31:27+00:00): Yes, correct. This is about way 177811341 and speed for it was changed recently, but by someone else. Sorry for bothering and thanks for your contribution!
Dmytro O (2017-04-25 01:33:25+00:00): No problem. 

BTW, I do not know Przepisy Drogowe well, but IMHO 177811341  should have 50km/h limit. One can drive from Zachodnia through non-public roads to Bobrzynskiego and he will be not sure what is the speed limit there.
Maciej9 (2017-04-25 12:40:54+00:00): Yes, but according to law it is not obligatory to repeat sign in such place. I think that it is acceptable here, as section is quite short and someone turning from side street could hardly accelerate above 50 before next 70 sign. But someone continuing straight on Bobrzyńskiego does not have to slow down to 50 on this section.
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:12:02+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 11:57:37+00:00): The area's of node 4744015554 and also the small park that's actually someone's house above it aren't parks. Again, you miss mapping houses and tiny grassy areas as parks.
stevea (2019-04-21 02:28:46+00:00): When you say "above it," do you mean "northerly?"

And nope, these are legally and jurisdictionally part of Twin Lakes State Beach.  I am not mismapping, I am mapping "what is."  If you can specify what is wrong here, say what that is, please.  I don't see how these are part of "someone's house," at least as I use DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery.  On the more northerly "triangle park," I can see (and have mapped) a trapezoidal building, however, perhaps the State Parks Depatment uses this for storage, I don't know.  But it is still "park."
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 07:28:26+00:00): "these are legally and jurisdictionally part of Twin Lakes State Beach"

Hhhmmm, do you have a reference for that? Even if they were, your still mixing up legal status (I.E. landuse) with a leisure activity (I.E. what makes something a park in OSM. Plus, as we have already established else everything owned or maintained by the parks department doesn't automatically get tagged as a park. Not to mention, it's clear from the photo's that there is a clear delineation line between the park, which it's debatle if it even is one. Its more like protected area. Which they themselves they maintain protected areas. So some things out there run by them are), and the residential area. Which clearly goes past so the "building" is part of the residential area. As the place has a chain link fence along the border that make it's separate. If it was owned by the parks department, why would it have a fenced off back and side yard from what you claim is there own property? Seems odd it would. 

"I can see (and have mapped) a trapezoidal building, however, perhaps the State Parks Depatment uses this for storage, I don't know."

Exactly, you don't know if its owned by the parks department, "but it might be. So I'll just say it is." Right. That sounds like some sound logic. Not. 

If you look at the Street Side images there's planters outside the place with plants, there's also curtains on the window, and the aforementioned fence. It would be odd if it was just an out building for storage that it would have well cared for potted plants and curtains on the window. Not to mention the backyard also has a garden. Again, in a fenced off yard. Doesn't sound like a "storage building" to be. Even more telling though, is the fact that in most of the images people are parked just below there on the side of the road. Even though the parking lot for it is completely empty. Which seems odd if it was just part of the park. There's nothing saying people can't park there. Maybe they just aren't though, because they know it's a house? Sounds logical to me. Btw, there's also nothing on the building or anywhere else on the property saying it's a parks department building and usually there is if it is. I think I thoroughly disproved it though, from things you could have easily found out yourself if you had of done basic research. 

Btw, the place is 120 9th Avenue. So there's also other ways to verify if it's a residence that you could have easily found if you wanted to like https://www.beenverified.com/property/ca/santa-cruz/9th-ave-residences/ Which clearly shows people live there. Even if it might be "owned" by the parks department (which it's 100% clear it's not), it's obviously a residence with people living there and not a "park." 

Again, if your going to state things, at least do some basic research and use multiple sources to back yourself up with. Otherwise, your just wasting people's time, like you did here.
stevea (2019-04-26 19:09:12+00:00): I didn't say the Parks Department owns the building, I said the Parks Department owns the land.  Buildings on land are also owned by the owner of the land, however they may be used.  (Storage, leased to others, whatever).  This IS "sound logic."  What I said I didn't know is what the Parks Department uses the building for.  That's all.

Speculate all you like about curtains and planters, meanwhile, I'll shrug (and pay little heed to word salad by others).  You haven't really proven or disproven anything.  And all I have asserted in OSM is what State Parks says.

Prove to yourself this is state park land:  download the .kml file at http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=862 and see that it is part of what state parks owns.  If you think (now that you know it is owned by state parks) that it is something else, tag it that way.  But it IS part of Twin Lakes State Beach, however it is used, so, I tagged that way.  I see little offered by you except "I think people live there" to say otherwise, and while that may be true, it both doesn't make sense and it doesn't change that State Parks themselves say "this is part of this state beach."

I don't recall "we" (you or I, or OSM generally) "have already established else everything owned or maintained by the parks department doesn't automatically get tagged as a park," but if you want to say that, a good first step would be examples and counter-examples to offer as evidence/proof.  (Maybe you meant "elsewhere" instead of "else," I have only your misspellings by which to glean what you mean).
GerdP (2017-08-31 06:29:43+00:00): Hi!
Please review:
Your change has left an invalid no_u_turn restriction: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3525664
Not sure if this should be corrected or removed.
I also don't think that the new restriction is needed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7087744
after I changed the closed road from the unusual highway=closed:secondary to the common disused:highway=secondary
BTW: It is a no_right_turn ;-)
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
MatiasJ (2017-08-31 11:16:41+00:00): Hi @GerdP
About this change as left:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3525664
It´s ok because there´s a left turning line.

And thanks for disused advice.
GerdP (2017-08-31 11:24:46+00:00): Sorry, don't understand. I posted links to two different turn restrictions. One is obsolete, one is incomplete (the no_u_turn)
user_514683 (2017-03-22 13:20:04+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. Glad to see someone adding things in Shanghai.
Just a couple of comments: the name tag should be just the name. For example, "Suzhou Cobblers". The shop=shoes tag already indicates that it's a shoe shop. I'll edit it.

Happy mapping.
adrianojbr (2017-03-21 20:01:10+00:00): maurício, o estacionamento não é do condomínio. é um estacionamento comercial, de acesso público. reverti sua edição. abraço.
Mauricio Schwartzhaupt Narcizo (2017-03-21 20:40:15+00:00): Entendi.
Obrigado pela correção.
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:27:19+00:00): I deleted the misused items around "your" house. Please stick to adding real things to OSM. Your other edits are really welcome but please do not map to get a favor at Pokemon Go!
jremillard (2017-12-19 00:41:01+00:00): Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields.
Constable (2018-02-09 16:30:25+00:00): pokemon trash, I'm removing it
Constable (2018-02-09 16:30:47+00:00): pgo trash
Constable (2018-02-09 16:31:24+00:00): residential area inside another res. area. Doesn't make sense
transilien_cartocite (2017-03-22 14:10:00+00:00): Bien noté ami Florian, j'étais inquiet mais ton texte me rassure. On attend les photos. Bon le tag fixme là où tu pourrais mettre une note on tolère ;-)
La bise,
Antoine.
overflorian (2017-03-22 15:25:51+00:00): Merci Ôh! grand Maitre du tag !
overflorian (2017-03-23 07:52:44+00:00): En attendant les photos de CdG2 voici celles de CdG1 : https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/pXY4CF6eHZy1w-p-l86TIg
Géoloc et orientation vérifiée à la mano pour chaque photo
StephaneP (2017-03-23 08:43:45+00:00): Yes !!!!!
Warin61 (2017-04-18 22:04:11+00:00): Way 475592320 crosses over itself. So it does not render well ... OSM inspector calls it a 'self intersection'.
aharvey (2017-04-18 22:46:38+00:00): Thanks for noting this, it looks like it's happened as a result of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47860192 I'll move the discussion over there.
eggie (2017-03-20 08:51:36+00:00): 'k Denk niet dat de aardrijkskundige naam afwatering hoort te zijn.
Zou dat er niet afmoeten?
Rvankempen (2017-03-20 08:56:42+00:00): Excuses, het lijkt alsof er twee aanpassingen door elkaar lopen
eggie (2017-03-20 08:58:55+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46997166
Die afwateringen boven de parkeergarage zijn toch ook niet te zien. 
Lopen die beneden het maaiveld?
Rvankempen (2017-03-20 09:06:35+00:00): Jawel, zijn duidelijk zichtbare grepels met putten
eggie (2017-03-20 09:20:18+00:00): Helemaal prima.. Map what's on the ground is het motto. In het begin volgen we de eerste edits van startende mappers. De naam "afwatering" hoort echter niet op een greppel. 
Kijk in de wiki hoe je evt. goten kunt mappen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features#Wegen
Mapse verder.
Rvankempen (2017-03-20 09:22:00+00:00): Ik zal het aanpassen
ToniE (2017-03-20 07:52:01+00:00): Hallo flutus,

ich habe bemerkt, dass Du an ÖPNV arbeitets.

Kennst Du schon:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation#Qualit.C3.A4tssicherung_-_M.C3.BCnchen.2FTransportation

und

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation/Analyse

Viele Grüße
Toni
Flutus (2017-03-20 21:44:32+00:00): Ja, habe ich schon gesehen. Mir war nicht ganz klar ob das schon entschieden ist, dass Network einheitlich MVV sein soll, daher habe ich erstmal network:short vereinheitlicht.
ToniE (2017-03-21 09:40:33+00:00): Das mit MVV oder Münchner ... wurde zwar mal festgelegt (auf der ersten Seite unten), es gab aber Stimmen, die den Konfllikt mit Mannheimer Verkehrstverbund (MVV) sehen. Das kann bei Sketch-Line (z.B. http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=U1&network=MVV&style=wuppertal) zu Problemen führen.
Andereerseits scheinen Blanks und Umlaute bei Sketch-Line auch nicht immer zu funktionieren (z.B. http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=12&network=M%C3%BCnchner%2BVerkehrs-%2Bund%2BTarifverbund&style=wuppertal versus http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=12&network=Münchner+Verkehrs+und+Tarifverbund&style=wuppertal).

Lassen wir's mal offen ...
Gruß
Toni
ToniE (2017-03-21 09:42:08+00:00): Und selbst beim letzten Beispiel funzt es nicht einmal - was soll man da sagen?
Flutus (2017-03-21 21:12:49+00:00): Naja, aber eine Mischung aus kurz und lang bringt ja erst recht nichts, hm ...
Flutus (2017-03-22 23:35:22+00:00): Das hier funktioniert:
http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=12&network=M%C3%BCnchner%20Verkehrs-%20und%20Tarifverbund&style=wuppertal
ToniE (2017-03-23 06:17:35+00:00): Genau, ich habe auch raus gefunden, warum es auf der Analyseseite mal geht und mal nicht: Ich bilde die Sketch-Line-Abfrage aus dem 'network' vom Route-Master, wenn der existiert. Sketch-Line aber kennt keine Route-Master sondern nur Route, und wenn dann die 'enetwork' nicht übereinstimmen, dann geht's halt nicht. Außerdem hatte ich in vorauselendem Gehorsam die ' ' schon durch '+' ersetzt, was dann zu '%2B" ersetzt wurde und wiederum nicht funktionierte.

Was MVV versus Müchner ... und Bus versus Expressbus versus ... angeht bin ich mittlerweile entspannter, Hauptsache, wir bekommen die Linien mal komplett und korrekt zusammengestellt.
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:21:38+00:00): Your changes go live immediately after you upload them. Please refrain from such changes in the future.

There is enough you can map in Boise City to improve it
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:01:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

but is there a footway between those streets? Or path? Please add it, so pedestrians or cyclists do not have to detour.

Have fun mapping!
ejlane (2017-03-20 15:36:24+00:00): No, there is not. There are now houses that take up where the road used to be (kind of) and it is their yards. It is private, with fences and everything. Here is Google street view looking south from the north end.

https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6265028,-122.5524919,3a,60y,165.44h,69.9t,2.3r/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIySNgbXdeQwvdAoHWO5aSw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

I might not have gotten the northern end of the south road quite right - it's hard to tell where the road ends and driveway begins from the satellite picture. I don't go on the south part very much - I live around the corner from the north end.

Thanks,
Erik
dvdhoven (2017-03-20 06:41:16+00:00): Ik heb de Spoorstraat bij het fietspad langs de Koninginnelaan weer door geknipt. Door het doorverbinden waren 4 fietsroutes in de problemen gekomen.
Wees uitermate voorzichtig met ID bij het doorverbinden van wegen. ID waarschuwt niet als er relaties door het doorverbinden in de problemen komen. JOSM doet dat wel.
Overweeg een overstap naar JOSM

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Kogacarlo (2017-03-20 11:11:02+00:00): Ja wat stom zeg dat ik dat niet gezien heb. Ik check het altijd. Deze slipte er doorheen. Je had het snel gezien trouwens.
dvdhoven (2017-03-20 12:24:56+00:00): Ik heb het niet snel gezien, vmarc ziet dat snel. :-) meestal binnen de 2 uur. vmarc ververst om de 2 uur, dus 6, 8 enz. http://osma.vmarc.be/nl/overview

En een foutje is snel gemaakt. Geen problleem

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
TZorn (2017-03-30 08:18:24+00:00): Ich habe die place-Änderungen mit Changeset 47284662 revertiert. Siehe dazu auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=638859#p638859.
trigpoint (2017-03-20 19:22:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
It looks like you were adding a hedge. They are tagged as barrier=hedge.
Give me a shout if you need any help.
Alan (2017-03-20 04:08:41+00:00): Is this feature related? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357304270
Should they be combined?
MarkinVeneta (2017-03-20 05:04:28+00:00): No they are not related. The one you linked is in someone's back yard and not an actual park.
Penegal (2018-08-03 13:19:35+00:00): Attention : il est généralement admis que, pour nommer un hameau, il vaut mieux utiliser un nœud `place=…+name=…` pour nommer un hameau, au lieu de nommer la zone `landuse=residential` ; d’ailleurs, ce nœud étant déjà présent, nommer la zone résidentielle est redondant.
bhousel (2017-03-20 16:41:11+00:00): Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Spanholz (2017-03-29 13:58:15+00:00): You set big parts under water with your changeset here. Do you need help reverting it?
nammala (2017-07-06 12:09:37+00:00): Hi Joshua,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding parks for a wide range of stretch covering major and minor roads which is not a appropriate way of mapping. Please make sure you add data which is of good geometry and not with overlapping other features.

Happy Mapping.

Best reagards,
nammala
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:34:27+00:00): Incredible detail,

just one thing: I wouldn't map the inner town parts completly with landuse=grass. Never seen that and it doesn't fit to the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
Josef73 (2020-04-18 19:55:47+00:00): Hello, is this restaurant still open? The webside don't exist.
Josef73 (2022-03-27 05:30:46+00:00): Hello, is this restaurant still open? The webside don't exist.
nevw (2017-03-20 06:41:43+00:00): Hi Domhenry
Just curious to know how you get the height info for the buildings.
Nevw
domhenry (2017-03-20 19:13:01+00:00): The top 20 highest city buildings are in a Wiki page. Then with a bit of patience in Google almost all the city buildings have a number of levels - I used the level to height converter published by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. A few others a used Google Streetview to count the number of levels....
malcolmh (2017-03-20 06:39:38+00:00): Steve,

US lateral seamarks conform to the IALA-B system: port-hand marks are green and starboard-hand marks are red. (See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Buoyage_Systems).

This beacon is a starboard-hand mark, not port. I note that you have made the same mistake on other lateral marks.
Glassman (2017-03-20 14:33:32+00:00): Thanks for the great contribution - especially adding in the boundaries for Centennial Park. Normally people just draw rough boundaries - but it looks like you took the trouble to get the actual boundaries from the city. Thanks!!
AkuAnakTimur (2017-03-20 06:17:05+00:00): Definitely needs GPS traces over here to confirm its geometry
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
angys (2018-07-04 08:20:18+00:00): I think that was Lagong IC.(From Wikipedia)
AkuAnakTimur (2018-07-05 04:42:59+00:00): Not open for traffic yet? No connecting roads.

https://i.imgur.com/iqQulvA.jpg
angys (2018-07-05 09:26:44+00:00): Probably future IC since 2005 https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2005/09/29/open-the-bukit-lagong-access-to-guthrie-corridor/
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:02:45+00:00): No need to delete it. Just change it to highway=service and access to private, then it's a private driveway.
geoaria (2019-04-01 07:16:41+00:00): وقتی مسیری را به نقشه اضافه می کنید باید با تگ مناسب نسبت به محیط و راههای پیرامون باشد. در محوطه دانشگاه ها صرفا از تگ جاده خدماتی استفاده می گردد. مسیر های رفت و برگشت توسط شما مشخص نشده است. پیشنهاد می کنم ابتدا  قوانین ویکی را مطالعه کنید و سپس دست به ویرایش نقشه بزنید . ویرایش های شما پر از اشتباهات می باشد که مشغول اصلاح آنها هستم
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:15:10+00:00): You also added a lot of highway=unclassified here. Those are for streets/roads. But mostly they are footways, I changed that.
Hjart (2017-03-20 09:37:32+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag til nu.
mapper999 (2017-03-20 21:11:54+00:00): Hallo, hier ist wohl was schief gelaufen?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744563860

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481533420

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481533419
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Constable (2017-03-20 11:37:02+00:00): ciao, il tag name serve a indicare il vero nome dell'oggetto che si mappa, dubito che il nome ufficiale di questi giardini sia "Giardino residenziale" e "giardino residenziale con campo da basket".
I giardini se non hanno un nome ufficiale (Giardino Sandro Pertini, Parco Sempione, Parco di Monza,...) vano lasciati senza il tag name.
Inoltre, se i giardini combaciano esattamente con gli edifici che li circondano, lo stesso deve risultare dalla mappa, fai si che il perimetro dei giardini corra lungo il perimetro degli edifici (i due devono avere dei punti in comune)
Supaplex (2017-04-07 15:32:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
hadw (2017-04-29 16:43:53+00:00): As a general rule one should not abbreviate names.  If they need rendering, that should be done by the map renderer.  52nd Ave Bike Blvd should be 52nd Avenue Bike Boulevard.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

If a shorter, but ambiguous name is used locally, you can provide a short_name, but even then abbreviating words is probably not a good idea.
Spanholz (2017-03-20 09:12:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

your footways do not connect to the streets. So routing on them is not possible, could you please change that?

I don't think that landuse=meadow is correct, because it's only used for agriculture, maybe change it to landuse=grass.

Thanks and have fun mapping!
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2017-03-20 09:15:17+00:00): Ihrer zweiter edit schon in der Niederlande. Dann bekommt man bestimmt ein Begrüssungs-e-mail.

"Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
vasony (2017-03-30 10:55:26+00:00): Szia!

Utcanevek nincsenek esetleg a házszámokhoz?

Tamás
zsolt d (2017-03-30 19:42:40+00:00): Szia! Pillanatnyilag még nincsenek.