piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JDennis (2021-01-26 12:08:27+00:00): As far as I'm aware OpenStreetMap users still have permission to make use of the Strava heatmap data (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permissions/Strava).

As regarding the accuracy of the paths previously mapped, I walk and run in the path plenty, and know of many marked paths which have no longer or have never existed. I will endeavor to use my own GPS traces to mark out those which may not be covered by the heatmap.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Glassman (2021-01-26 17:54:23+00:00): Tip: the building outline should match the general shape of the building in the image.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98154326
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Glassman (2021-01-26 17:55:20+00:00): Tip: square the building by selecting the outline, then just type a "q" Can you review the houses in this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98154465
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:33:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:41:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Otenkiya (2021-05-03 10:54:25+00:00): 報告：ウェイ: 国道171号線 (900254291) の新設により、リレーション: 国道171号 (9316269)に分断が発生。修復済み。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
berndw (2021-01-26 11:08:34+00:00): Siehe hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98154987
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Glassman (2021-01-26 17:55:46+00:00): Please review your building edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98154794
Glassman (2021-01-26 17:53:00+00:00): Your first attempted look better than this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98154834
MoiraPrime (2021-01-27 20:32:36+00:00): Please try to keep edits you make in a single changeset close to each other. Everywhere between Jackson Mississippi and Macon Georgia will now see your edits as having been through their area, even if you never touched those places.

Also, please consider leaving actual descriptions of what you changed on each changeset. You haven't actually put a description for quite a long time if ever.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-01-26 07:19:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-26 07:24:57+00:00): Dag Brinkboy.. Loopt hier echt een pad of was het alleen je looproute?
Dan hoort het niet als wandelpad op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
user_12549853 (2021-01-26 07:38:44+00:00): Het is onderdeel van een uitgezette wandelroute door de gemeente Barneveld "Rondje Barneveld" van in totaal 22km. Het is een voortzetting van het gedeelte rechts dat al op de kaart stond (tussen de huizen en de beek) en links (tussen de huizen en de beek). Beide delen (links en recht) die al op de kaart stonden betreffen een onverharde maar uitgezette looproute. Wat ik heb aangevuld is het ontbrekende verbindingsstuk om de "heuvel met speeltoestellen" langs de beek. Mgv, Brinkboy.
eggie (2021-01-26 07:50:57+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.. veel plezier met mappen
Mvg
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Omalbneen ali (2021-01-26 07:18:41+00:00): ارجو التصحيح
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
woodpeck (2021-01-26 23:04:07+00:00): Dear shrddr, please use proper changeset comments that explain the edit you have been making. Do not fill the changeset comment with funny characters. Don't use the same comment for every changeset. Here's some background: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
shrddr (2021-01-27 14:51:50+00:00): My changesets do not have a well defined scope. I just scroll through the satellite imagery and update what's new and what's gone. These editing sessions are not constrained neither by area nor by any common theme. I can jump from street to street and town to town, update kindergartens, sex-shops and tree types all in the same changeset. Best comment I can come up with is "added X, modified Y, deleted Z entries" which as wiki says, can be inferred from the changes themselves and so is useless.
The flipping table emoticon symbolizes the protest against iD editor not allowing empty comments.
woodpeck (2021-01-27 15:20:52+00:00): Then please try to constrain your editing sessions either by area or by a common theme, so that other users will be able to understand what you were editing without having to analyze the contents of the changeset. For example, an apt changeset comment for 98154844 would have been "ФанЕжа is a cafe not a health food shop", or 98063672 would have been "added access=private to facilities that are private according to <source>", 97793277 is "fix typo in cuisine". Actually, none of those changesets matches "just scrolling through satellite imagery and updating what's new and what's gone". If it is possible for me to study your changeset and come up with a good description, then it is possible for you. The difference is that if you do it, it has to be done just once, and if every mapper who encounters your edit does it, it has to be done dozens of times. 
So please - proper changeset comments instead of childish protests against what is common practice for everyone else. 
Thank you.
berndw (2021-01-26 11:07:22+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Warum hast Du das Stück der Georg-Steuler-Straße gelöscht?
Das gleiche gilt für die Pfade im Wald.

Zum Erhalt der Historie sollten solche Wegen nicht gelöscht sondern mit entsprechenden Eigenschaften wie wie disused:highway, -->  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix, versehen werden.
Das gilt auch für korrekt erfasste Wege wie die Straße, die auf Luftbildern gut zu erkennen ist.

Alles andere gilt als Vandalismus und wird i.d.R. revertiert.


BTW: Ändere bitte Deine Hintergrundbilder auf ESRI um, diese sind in der Region besser positioniert.
 
Bernd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
wielandb (2021-07-07 23:11:46+00:00): Hey :)

So sollte die Praxis nicht eingetragen werden. 

Zum einen sollten Name der Praxis und der Praxis-Node an sich nicht getrennt sein.

Zum anderen bekommen Gebäude Eigenschaften nur, wenn wirklich das ganze Gebäude diesen Zweck erfüllt. Bedeutet: Ist das ganze Gebäude die Praxis, sollte das ganze Gebäude alle Eigenschaften haben. Ist die Praxis nur eine von mehreren Sachen in dem Gebäude, sollte es eine Node im Gebäude sein, die dann alle Eigenschaften hat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Flynn Marquardt (2021-01-27 13:38:35+00:00): Hi,
your last change broke th border of India, it is not a valid border anymore: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304716#map=10/35.4862/77.3183

e.g. it cannot be used for reverse geocoding.

Can you please fix that? You can use the validation button in JOSM for verification, it should not show any error.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-01-26 07:40:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-26 07:44:10+00:00): Je hebt nu de helft van de voetgangersoversteek verwijderd. Is die er niet meer?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
kapazao (2021-01-26 13:56:01+00:00): Hola, con el editor iD de OpenStreetMap puedes darle forma redonda a los elementos si pulsas con el botón derecho del ratón y seleccionas dar forma circular.
El depósito de agua claramente tiene esa forma, ya lo he corregido.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98155231
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Friendly_Ghost (2021-01-26 22:50:45+00:00): Hoi Jaap. Is dit geen bassin voor lokale waterberging?
jaap de vries (2021-01-27 07:09:35+00:00): Nee het is een vijver, geen wadi .
Zelfs de visvereniging maakt er gebruik van.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-01-27 13:13:35+00:00): In dat geval, is dit dan water=pond ?
Aleksandar1994 (2021-01-26 09:09:12+00:00): Changeset with comment from previous edit, I was adding missing roads in Ecuador. Original comment was: Adding missing roads in Ecuador using MapWithAI detections  #MSFTOpenMaps
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
!bm (2021-01-26 12:25:55+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,

du hast hier (wiederholt) addr:country=DE entfernt – das Thema hatten wir doch bereits, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96366540

--besteGrüße!bm
geozeisig (2021-01-27 06:57:23+00:00): Das Merkmal wird überbewertet, jedenfalls an dieser Stelle. Ich habe es wieder hinzugefügt, da eine Diskussion darüber überflüssig ist. Gut, das es bei den meisten Adressen nicht berücksichtigt wird. Auch JOSMs Tool für Adressen gibt es nicht automatisch weiter. Manchmal ist weniger auch mehr.
Besten Gruß Dieter
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Map_HeRo (2022-02-09 19:52:25+00:00): Hallo Jo Cassel, Du hast hier u.a. das NSG Dachsberg bei Iba (4 Teile) gemappt. Vom OSM Inspector wird angemeckert, dass die 4 Einzelflächen kein feature tag haben. Ist das Absicht? Ich will Dir hier nicht ins Handwerk pfuschen, daher nur Info.
Jo Cassel (2022-02-10 11:19:38+00:00): Hallo, das NSG ist nach der üblichen Methode für mehrflächige Schutzgebiete erstellt (wie zum Beispiel auch der Nationalpark Kellerwald-Edersee):
Die Daten des Gebietes sind der Relation zugeordnet, die einzelnen Teil-Flächen sind quasi Eigenschaftslos - funktioniert alles Bestens.
Keine Ahnung was dieser "Inspector" dort zusätzlich als "feature-Tags" an den ways der Teilflächen haben/sehen will - einfach ignorieren.
Map_HeRo (2022-02-10 19:45:24+00:00): Da der OSM Inspector lediglich ein QA-Tool ist, muss nicht jeder Hinweis eine "Fehlermeldung" sein. Warum das Tool die Einzelflächen nicht als Teile der Relation erkennt, entzieht sich auch meiner Kenntnis. Wollte Dich nur darauf hinweisen, da mir das bisher noch nicht untergekommen ist. Wird zukünftig ignoriert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al