piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2020-11-30 11:59:44+00:00): Hallo,

welchen besonderen Sinn hat es, für die beiden Bahnsteige in Zaisenhausen separate Stop-Area-Relationen anzulegen? Das ist ein Bahnhof.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95004268
michael2402 (2020-11-30 12:11:20+00:00): Danke für das merken des Fehlers. Da sind nun sogar drei Relationen, zwei neue und eine alte. Mir ist das beim bearbeiten gar nicht aufgefallen und eigentlich hätte es auch gar nicht möglich sein sollen, den einen Bahnsteig zu zwei stop_area Relationen hinzu zu fügen.

Ja, eigentlich hätte es nur eine Relation sein sollen. In der Routenansicht wir der Fehler auch angezeigt. Ich dachte gestern, ich wäre danach gegangen, dann hätte ich es sehen sollen.

Ich werd heut Abend mal schauen, was da das Problem war und die Relation dann auch reparieren.
michael2402 (2020-11-30 17:01:26+00:00): Ich habe die Daten gefixt und bei der Gelegenheit gleich die Ursache mit behoben.

https://github.com/JOSM/pt_assistant/pull/36#issuecomment-735912548
brenburk (2021-01-10 02:40:43+00:00): glad this cut is finally on a map!
TrekClimbing (2021-03-17 08:45:22+00:00): Hi malcolmgc

Tagging access=no is like tagging a military area, rather than just a private field. access=private is the preferred tag.
0000FF berries (2020-12-03 23:34:04+00:00): Γεια σου :) Μια χαρά! Αν η εκκλησία είναι ορθόδοξη, μπορεί να προστεθεί και denomination=greek_orthodox  https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:denomination # https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship :)
angorf (2020-12-04 13:06:45+00:00): Γεια χαρά. Προσέθεσα το denomination. Ευχαριστώ πολύ για τις προτάσεις.
mavl (2020-11-30 17:49:43+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
0000FF berries (2020-12-03 23:26:54+00:00): Γεια σου agorf :) Σου γράφω μιας και ζήτησες review. Μπορούμε να πρσθέσουμε tower:type=observation (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:tower:type ) μιας και είναι παρατηρητήριο. Επίσης θα πρότεινα αυτό που είναι τώρα ως όνομα να τεθεί ως "description" (δες https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only και αποφάσισε). Και το όνομα έχει ένα μικρό ορθογραφικό :) Τhanks για τις προσθήκες που έκανες τελευταία :) Αν έχεις απορίες, στείλε μήνυμα εδώ ή στο φόρουμ https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 Aν έχω χρόνο θα κοιτάξω και τις άλλες αλλαγές αύριο/ΣΚ. Καλές χαρτογραφήσεις :)
angorf (2020-12-04 13:04:41+00:00): Καλησπέρα! Ευχαριστώ πολύ για τις προτάσεις. Τις εφάρμοσα όλες εκτός από το tower:type που ήταν ήδη observation.
0000FF berries (2020-12-04 22:44:47+00:00): Μια χαρά :) Και έχεις δίκιο, το είχες ήδη βάλει το tower:type :) Καλό Σαββατοκύριακο :)
surveyor54 (2020-11-30 16:21:02+00:00): Ich mal wieder,
wenn du heute vor Ort warst, kannst du bitte noch das "check_date=2017-10-06" aktualisieren?
Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2020-12-05 22:22:43+00:00): Es wäre schön, wenn du da "check_date" noch eintragen würdest, ich kann es nicht, denn ich war nicht dort.
mavl (2020-11-30 17:51:16+00:00): Hello. This changeset fixes nothing.
!bm (2020-11-30 00:52:47+00:00): falsche Quellenangaben, sollte sein:
source=mapillary; changeset comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94294676; Geoportal Berlin / Digitale farbige Orthophotos 2019 (DOP20RGB); Geoportal Berlin / Baumbestand Berlin
mavl (2020-11-30 17:52:51+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
woodpeck (2020-11-30 16:30:18+00:00): Dear localbirder, I came across this edit because you had accidentally "opened" the coastline which led to the flooding of a large part of the continental US. I fixed that now, and in doing so encountered a number of other smaller problems that arose from your editing, like cart paths folding back onto themselves or overlapping each other, overlapping buildings and so on. If your editor makes you aware of these problems, maybe worth having a look!
user_11977417 (2020-11-30 17:26:06+00:00): Thanks! I thought i put that back where it belonged! I appreciate the notice and will be more careful to just Undo instead of correct myself.

I do review all the edits when saving. I adjust and do find the notifications helpful. The level of detail needed for the project I am on requires this level of specificity in cartpaths. I can definitely combine the various building shapes since those are single structures. I see how to do that now. Thanks again and I appreciate the feedback very much.
user_11977417 (2020-11-30 17:51:40+00:00): Oh, as to the cartpaths, the OSM data that is imported to the product I am using and into the final location has limits as to the number of objects which I worry I might come up against. As a compromise, the overlaps allowed me to reduce the number of objects slightly. It is not a common occurrence and I suspect the overlaps caused users no issues. Perhaps there are reasons other than data purity that I am unaware of. Thanks again.
Pollux17 (2020-11-30 22:32:48+00:00): Ciao, purtroppo non sempre iD fa bene a proporre cambi, in questo caso i parcheggi in strada andavano bene come parking_space. Se non hai niente in contrario risistemo i tag
dega180 (2020-12-01 08:45:43+00:00): Ciao, la sostituzione da parking_space a parking non l'ha proposta iD. L'ho fatta io perché dalla documentazione sembra che partking_space sia dedicato ad un singolo slot di parcheggio e parking invece mi sembrava più appropriato. Ho provveduto a risostituire come hai chiesto esplicitando però la capacity (visibile da satellite)
Pollux17 (2020-12-01 16:17:16+00:00): è un argomento controverso, anch'io avevo studiato la cosa quando ho fatto quelle modifiche e avevo deciso che parking fosse limitato alle grandi strutture di parcheggio. Purtroppo non c'è un modo definitivo per mappare il parcheggio su strada, solo come tag nelle way delle strade.
Ogni tanto c'è qualche proposta ma fin'ora non hanno approvato niente mi sembra
Pollux17 (2020-12-04 14:04:19+00:00): Giusto il tempo di parlarne ed è stata approvata una nuova modalità di mappatura! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Vedro di risistemare via Nievo, e se ne trovo anche altri
dega180 (2020-12-04 17:26:35+00:00): Ottimo! Approvazione avvenuta a fagiuolo.
jpennycook (2020-12-01 17:54:51+00:00): Thanks for fixing the bus routes on the roundabout in Lychpit after I broke them!
Carnildo (2020-11-30 05:07:08+00:00): Is there a reason why you renamed the Stillwater River to the Flathead River?
mavl (2020-11-30 17:53:48+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
ralley (2020-11-30 02:48:58+00:00): Please do not put generic names/descriptions in the name field:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95008104
blackboxlogic (2020-11-30 02:03:05+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing. I see you're marking some features as "access=private" which is used when there is a sign that says "no trespassing" or a fence/gate. On the other hand, to indicate that something isn't publicly owned, I suggest the "ownership=private" tag. I suspect that is more likely the case for the few roads you've just edited but I am not there, so I can't see what you're seeing. Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95008633
MoveMaine (2020-11-30 02:30:17+00:00): Hi, thank you for the recommendation. The roads I have marked as private are private drives, meaning they do not have public access but are private roads maintained by the owner - however, they do not have no trespassing signs or gates. I will adjust accordingly. Thanks.
mavl (2020-11-30 17:54:53+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
felipeeugenio (2020-12-01 13:17:59+00:00): Hola ALonso.
Unclassified es para caminos públicos con algún grado de tránsito (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified) Para una entrada privada track es lo más apropiado si es que es una zona rural

sobre el landuse=residential que usas, es incorrecto. Es para zonas urbanas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential) Para casas que administran un campo quizas es mejor landuse=farmyard (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard)

Por favor no volvamos a que mapeas sin averiguar nada. Llevas ya algunos días mapeando muy bien. Saludos
Glassman (2020-11-30 03:31:34+00:00): Tip: access=private means that people shouldn't driving on the road. If the road is posted as no trespassing then access=private is appropriate. Roads maintained by a apartment complex are privately maintain but people can drive down the road. Those If there is not street name, then I'd mark them as a service road. If you have any questions let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95009078
Wes Plate (2020-11-30 04:04:27+00:00): 1. In one case there was a locked gate with signs saying construction area and habitat restoration area.2. In another case the "road" became someone's yard, there was a fence blocking access3. In the third case, there was a gate totally preventing access. I tried calling through the gate call box to ask permission and for them to open the gate, but there was no answer, or it didn't work. The signs said only residents were allowed inside. So in all three cases Private seems appropriate.
Thank you!
Glassman (2020-11-30 06:08:14+00:00): That's perfect. Thanks for the edits.
mavl (2020-11-30 17:55:54+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
BCNorwich (2020-11-30 08:09:44+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended and added to your data. Also removed the building (POI) inside building so as to meet OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
Korgi1 (2020-12-05 19:38:28+00:00): "Do not edit to change the status of these islands or revert edits doing so without first contacting the Data Working Group." Did you get permission from OSM/DWG for this changeset? OSM operates on territory mapped by the current owner not giving priority to those making claims.
FreedSky (2020-12-28 08:10:37+00:00): OSM operates on territory mapped by the current owner not giving priority to those making claims.

same word to you and add japan relation editer.
FreedSky (2020-12-28 08:12:07+00:00): 另外你可以关注下我的编辑注释

According to Google search results, wikipedia descriptions, and news reports, these islands are uninhabited islands, and different countries have ships patrolling nearby. In addition; removing the state affiliation can avoid editing wars.
FreedSky (2020-11-30 02:36:43+00:00): 如果编者希望钓鱼列岛能渲染属于自己国家的边界，有以下方法。
1：自行居住在岛屿
2：请求自己国家驻军岛屿
3：自行渲染一个效果以自己国家边界为准

編集者がDiaoyu諸島に自国の国境を誇張させたい場合は、次の方法があります。
1：一人で島に住む
2：自国に島に軍隊を駐留させるよう要請する
3：自分の国境を条件として、自分でエフェクトをレンダリングする
user_5359 (2020-12-01 17:24:27+00:00): Short question to the key nate:zh: Did you mean note:zh instead (I want only prevent edit wars :) )?
damember (2020-12-03 03:40:53+00:00): Where can I find the tagging rules on which your commits are based?
According to the OpenStreetMap wiki, the following is a description of how to resolve disputed names:

“In the case where there are multiple local names, then if the government with effective and sustained control of the area has an official source of names or an official stance on a naming dispute, then that name is default.”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes

Therefore, I tagged it as a Japanese border at changesets #88546641, #88644868 and #93020615 because this area is effectively controlled by Japan.
It doesn't matter if these islands are uninhabited.

I’d like to avoid an edit war, but if you don't revert this, I'll revert it again.
user_5359 (2020-12-03 03:51:40+00:00): Have I understood that correctly? You want to set a limit (which also has legal consequences with considerable extent) just because you want to prioritise a certain name?
Dimacn (2020-11-30 02:49:23+00:00): Пожалуйста, не вписывайте названия лесным насаждениям. Не может у деревьев быть названия "деревья". В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Dimacn (2020-11-30 02:52:06+00:00): Пожалуйста, не вписывайте названия лесным насаждениям. Не может у деревьев быть названия “деревья”. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
mavl (2020-11-30 17:56:57+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-30 08:11:51+00:00): This actually has Look Left/Right marking. The variety of "marked" crosswalks locally (including zebra-marked but non-zebra crosswalks) is why I prefer using `crossing=uncontrolled`. 
It's also nicer if you extend the line across the road.
Nemo_Nemo (2020-11-30 08:21:52+00:00): Changed to 'crossing=uncontrolled' but not sure what you mean by 'across the road'.  woulld you mind make the modification for this?
Dimacn (2020-11-30 02:55:21+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, такими точками вы отмечаете отдельные реальные деревья?
Dimacn (2020-11-30 03:05:49+00:00): В очередной раз говорю. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM: 1. Вы добавили лесные насаждения “деревья” там где их нет! Рисуете деревья поверх зданий, дорог и пустырей. Вы используете устаревшие спутниковые снимки “Bing aerial imagery”. Пожалуйста используйте Esri или Maxar. 2. Мы вносим названия только если у объекта есть имя собственное. Не могут деревья иметь название “деревья”! Все ваши подобные правки будут отменены.
Dimacn (2020-11-30 02:56:39+00:00): Пожалуйста, не вписывайте названия лесным насаждениям. Не может у деревьев быть названия “деревья”. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
heretofore (2021-02-25 15:54:20+00:00): If you're familiar with this park, can you set the one-way direction?
arichnad (2021-02-25 19:32:09+00:00): The last time I was at this park was at least a few years ago.  I don't remember which way the trail goes, sorry.  Are you familiar with it?  If you can tell me which way the trail goes, I can make that change.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-13 04:51:05+00:00): 1) Please use changeset comments and include what you changed and why.

2) This is not a bridge.  The other way should have been a tunnel.  Fixed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879104396
Carnildo (2020-11-30 18:31:13+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted a dozen parking lots here?  According to the aerial imagery, they still exist.
下り専門 (2020-11-30 13:04:30+00:00): このエリアは国土地理院の航空写真の精度が低いのをgpsログで確認済みです。
川根本町の航空写真で位置合わせをお願いします。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kawanehoncho_ortho
tastrax (2020-12-06 05:25:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Carnildo (2020-11-30 18:40:24+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted an apartment complex here?
user_5239402 (2020-11-30 08:11:55+00:00): 안녕하세요 지도에는 사심이 들어가면 지도의 의미와 가치가 없습니다. 다시 편집해 주세요.
user_5239402 (2020-11-30 08:10:21+00:00): 이봐요 지도에 그런것을 편집하면 지도의 의미가 없습니다.
user_5239402 (2020-11-30 08:10:51+00:00): 제대로 편집하세요 사심은 지도에 표시하지 마세요ㅡㅡ
ralley (2020-11-30 05:38:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, unfortunately it has multiple issues:  a node for 16 Shropshire Ave already exists; add ress nodes shouldn't be placed on the road way; address nodes aren't tagged like this, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95017177
eggie (2020-11-30 08:06:31+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.
het is beter om als startend mapper niet dit soort wijzigingen uit te voeren
Je hebt de tag boundery=administratieve verwijderd.
Zou je willen aangeven waarom je dat nodig vond?
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-11-30 08:11:01+00:00): reverted by changeset · #95026625

Please don't change or delete the boundery=administrative
greetz, eggie
!bm (2020-11-30 12:32:49+00:00): Hallo CMatz,
ja, richtig kein Industriegebäude. Allerdings hat es bereits eine building-Relation, die weitere Tags aufnimmt und schon recht umfassend getaggt ist. Entsprechend geändert/aktualisiert/erweitert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95044436
--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2020-11-30 08:12:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2020-11-30 08:26:56+00:00): This would have been confusing because there are multiple levels here. It's not tagged with `indoor=*`. Technically you can walk through there.
Nemo_Nemo (2020-11-30 08:31:29+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out.  Tagged with 'indoor=yes' and 'Layer=1' to clear the confusion.
user_5359 (2020-11-30 15:31:56+00:00): Hello! You add a very short access value x. Which value did you mean? Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/13769009
chosayan (2020-11-30 15:36:47+00:00): Hello! The same has been rectified.
eggie (2020-11-30 08:19:27+00:00): Dag Harry.. Je hebt hier source=BAG verwijderd. waarom is dat?
Verder kijk hier in de wiki hoe een laadpaal te taggen.
Vooral de doelgroep is belangrijk. 
Fietskaarten geven immers ook laadpalen aan. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95022082
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-30 08:22:01+00:00): De name=Graaf Janlaan 2 cars   verwijderd..
Harry van den Brink (2020-11-30 09:05:38+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Source onterecht verwijderd: heb ik inmiddels weer gecorrigeerd. Laadpaal zal ik nakijken in de wiki en opnieuw aanbrengen indien nodig. 
Dank voor de hulp!
Mvg, Harry
eggie (2020-11-30 11:53:06+00:00): Oke.. Top!  Het hoeft natuurlijk niet meteen.
mapse,
eggie
ralley (2020-11-30 07:07:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Please don't use generic names/descriptions like "Commercial area" in the name field: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314
ralley (2020-12-16 19:29:38+00:00): Thanks for fixing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314
limes11 (2020-11-30 14:19:59+00:00): Hi und Willkommen zu osm!

Wie ist denn hier die Situation? So wie es jetzt verzeichnet ist, ergibt das wenig Sinn. Ist die Geradeausspur vorruebergehend gesperrt?

Gruss, Limes
clemsi_s (2020-11-30 14:23:41+00:00): Hi, 
sorry ich kenne mich damit nicht gut aus bisher. Von der Cadolzburger Str. kann nur noch nach rechts in die Würzburger Straße abgebogen werden. Die Durchfahrt geradeaus in die Hochstraße ist nicht mehr möglich. 

Grüße
limes11 (2020-11-30 14:30:23+00:00): Ok. Ich habe das mal provisorisch geflickt, so dass niemand mehr geradeaus geschickt wird. Jemand mit Orts- und OSM-Kenntnis sollte sich das ansehen. 

Viele Gruesse!
woodpeck (2020-11-30 16:32:38+00:00): This edit broke the coastline of island 24958480. Can you explain why you performed the edit and what you wanted to achieve? The text "." as a changeset comment unfortunately tells us little.
ShakyIsles (2020-12-01 01:00:08+00:00): Hi, Sorry just improving the detail of the shoreline. Seems I left a gap in error.
Skinfaxi (2020-12-04 09:52:14+00:00): why do you import tracks without connecting them to any other ways? And how are you able to do so many changesets in a minute?

Is this manual mapping or an import? If it is an import: Is it discussed on det import mailinglist?
Skinfaxi (2020-12-04 09:54:27+00:00): why do you import tracks without connecting them to any other ways? And how are you able to do so many changesets in a minute?

Is this manual mapping or an import? If it is an import: Is it discussed on det import mailinglist?
mavl (2020-11-30 17:58:47+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.
Poretsew (2020-12-01 15:59:28+00:00): Beste Jillis,
In deze wijzigingenset heb je een kruising in de rechterbovenhoek (bij twee bruggen)  aan de hand van de PDOK luchtfoto in aangepast, maar dit is niet de huidige situatie. De Van Essenlaan loopt namelijk  als voorrangsweg in een vloeiende beweging van west naar noord loopt en de zijstraat sluit hier met 1 rijbaan op aan. Dit had ik op 26 augustus aangepast. Zou je je wijzigingenset willen terugdraaien zodat de juiste verkeerssituatie weer terugkomt en dan opnieuw de gebouwen toevoegen? Alvast bedankt.
NB: in je reactie op de note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2446642#map=16/52.0183/5.5799&layers=N) 
heb je het over satellietfoto's van september maar deze moeten ouder zijn, gezien de huidige verkeerssituatie die er nog niet op staat (en die in augustus werd gerealiseerd).
Jillis inactivE (2020-12-01 17:40:23+00:00): Excuus, ik dacht dat ik de satellietfoto's van sept 2020 voor me had toen ik het aanpaste, maar het waren inderdaad oudere foto's blijkbaar. Niet de PDOK, maar ook Superview. 
Ik heb de Van Essenlaan terug aangepast met de juiste foto, geen revert gedaan.
Gebouwen heb ik niet toegevoegd, dat heb ik met een import laten doen. Ik heb daarna het wegennet aangepast, mede omdat er een straat-in-aanbouw door achtertuinen liep.
AndersAndersson (2020-11-30 08:23:56+00:00): Stop this import!
abakus_uploader (2020-11-30 23:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SSM2020 (2020-12-01 16:46:50+00:00): Hi Bernard,
How do I get the name to appear under the node?

Sid
BCNorwich (2020-12-01 18:59:54+00:00): Hi Sid, 
There is no individual POI node as all info is now contained on the building polygon/outline. The name and the teapot symbol do appear as at this zoom level https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95028163#map=18/51.58457/-0.27995

Zoom levels are not all rendered at the same time sometimes there are delays. Of course other maps will depend on when the data is updated. Clearing your browser cache might help. 

Regards Bernard
tom_yorados (2020-12-01 22:38:26+00:00): Hallo Zauberwaldemo,
meintest du "Schuttplatz" ?
Viele Grüße
Tom
user_8722718 (2020-12-01 14:10:10+00:00): Gran bel lavoro :)
Cascafico (2020-11-30 20:04:24+00:00): In Italia è stata raggiunto consenso che i civici debbano essere su nodi: è possibile avere i civici come nodi all'ingresso principale?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95029319
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-30 17:16:51+00:00): Merci :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95030177
DP24PH (2020-12-03 19:47:44+00:00): This changeset have successfully proven the overhaul with QA/QC protocols that has been strictly observed, including the PUV routes, following the earlier changeset 95015383 that have successfully recovered the missing Molino Overpass under construction on OSM. DP24 is now investigating on several incidents that may cause unwanted alterations to the existing national highway, PUV route relations at the time being.

Always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane, and you are loved.


DP24
Kovoschiz (2020-11-30 11:00:49+00:00): This doesn't work without setting up turning restrictions correctly.
mavl (2020-11-30 17:59:29+00:00): Hello. This changeset changes nothing.