piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2021-02-03 23:42:03+00:00): Hello,

please stop with these edits immediately!

Your activities are well-intentioned, but you have not properly understood the purpose of this task. It is about converting solar plants, which were previously only recorded as points, into areas.

You have only moved correctly drawn houses into a wrong position on the basis of distorted aerial photographs. Therefore I will undo all your such changes. Unfortunately, the damage caused was much greater than the benefit.
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:34:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8391791017
it's an embassy ? witch country ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:diplomatic=embassy
Regards,
Marc
!bm (2021-02-09 22:45:35+00:00): Hallo AlexTurbo,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! 

Wer 30B sagt, muss auch 30A sagen – oder so ähnlich. Der Zugang erfolgt wohl durch die Einfahrt von Mühlenstr30? In dieser Annahme habe ich einen Teil des hier gelöschten Weges wiederhergestellt und auch das Gebäude anhand ALKIS-Gebäude-Layer verfeinert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99002907

Happy mapping!

--besteGrüße!bm
AlexTurbo (2021-02-09 23:31:48+00:00): Hi, thank you, you are absolutely right!
How can I enable this ALKIS-Gegaeude-Layer?
eggie (2021-02-03 19:01:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 



Lijkt me oke... 
Hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:advertising%3Dbillboard

vind je nog meer info die je evt. kunt toevoegen.
Je hebt wel de 'billboard' aan de landuse forest geplakt. 
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
msevilla00 (2021-03-03 22:15:08+00:00): Hola Pablo, es genial que te tomes la molestia de editar más elementos en OSM pero ya que te tomas la molestia sería genial si pudieras editar los mismos, por ejemplo en este conjunto de cambios el camino que creaste, hacerlo con más precisión pues saltan alarmas de que has realizado giros imposibles para un camino... Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98662276
mweper (2021-02-04 01:01:32+00:00): No me parece adecuado la etiqueta landuse=forest (bosque gestionado o plantación forestal), creo que sería mejor las etiqueta landcover=trees (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landcover%3Dtrees) y natural=tree (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree).
-
Por favor, revisar bien.
limes11 (2022-07-27 16:44:25+00:00): Hi, 

was ist den mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510793713 ?

Hat der keine Anbindung? Ist da wirklich ein Pfad?

VG, Limes
JayTurnr (2021-02-03 19:15:08+00:00): This is the last change I'm making. Essentially I restored history to the node, but kept the location and tag changes you made in your latest edit :)
eggie (2021-02-03 20:59:52+00:00): Dag FFFT
shop=farm is oke, maar farm=shop  kan weg.
Wel kun je  description=  toevoegen met wat extra info. 
MVG
eggie
petrv-earth (2021-02-03 20:07:00+00:00): oops, looking into why it shows changes over such a wide area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98663945
petrv-earth (2021-02-03 20:14:48+00:00): Accidentaly mixed with edit of road in unrelated region, apart from that most changes are in area of https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.4503/31.1941
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98663945
A67-A67 (2021-02-04 10:23:44+00:00): Dit klopt niet. We categoriseren wegen op basis van hun positie binnen het netwerk, niet hun uitbouwstatus. Een doorgaande route binnen de bebouwde kom kan prima een primaire weg zijn, ongeacht of het een provinciale of gemeentelijke weg is.

Dus of de gehele route tussen de A50 en het centrum van Arnhem is een primaire weg, of de gehele weg is een secundaire weg. Het hoort niet halverwege zomaar te veranderen.
aceman444 (2021-04-04 19:43:38+00:00): Zdravim, vidim, ze ste usek cesty uplne odstranili, namiesto len nastavenia prekazky. Ak je cesta zasypanim znicena (boal len nejaka vyslapana v trave, potom je to v poriadku. Ak to bol napr. asfaltovy chodnik, ktory bude odstranenim haldy obnoveny, potom to nebolo spravne. Aky je tam stav? Dakujem
velkedecko (2021-04-05 10:18:39+00:00): Prva moznost. Povodne to bola vyslapana cesta v trave, teraz je zavalena haldou. Ocakavam, ze po doknceni stavby sa tam zas cesta vytvori v nejakej forme obchadzajuc stavbu (ak to vobec bude mozne).
aceman444 (2021-04-05 14:16:49+00:00): Dobre, potom ok, dakujem.
Cascafico (2021-02-04 09:16:33+00:00): Hai duplicato un tag place già esistente. Per essere un "quartiere di Trieste" devono esserci 20 km di meno.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98664525
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-04 22:22:50+00:00): chiedo scusa
highflyer74 (2021-02-10 21:34:53+00:00): Hi ebt12!

Just a quick question: The festival locations you are mapping sound like they are of temporary nature. If that is the case I would like to ask you not to map those, as we don't map such things. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice for more info.

In case I am wrong, I do apologise. Please be so kind to reply within this changeset. Thank you :-)
ebt12 (2021-02-11 14:16:13+00:00): These festivals have been at their locations for decades. The land is owned by the festival owners. The owner of the Pittsburgh faire even built a house on the property around 2010.Many of the features of the faires such as stages and vendors have remained consistent through the years.
highflyer74 (2021-02-11 17:07:38+00:00): Hello there and thank you for your reply!

In that case I would probably add the times when it is open according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours to the main POI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306150189).

I noticed that there is address data added to several objects, producing duplicates of the same address. As we usually don't do duplicates, I would suggest to remove those and keep the address on the main gate to enable navigation.

Also the main tag which makes it a festival ground is missing. Maybe the very generic https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction would fit.

Maybe you can have a look at the name=* of some objects. For example "Gate area for the PRF" is not really a name. If you change that to "Main Gate" or so it would be more fitting. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more info naming.

Other than that I have shifted the whole thing a bit, fixed building geometry and added more geometry to the gate.

If you need more help, just let me know :-)
ma-rt-in (2021-02-07 08:22:12+00:00): Hallo,
ist der Betreiber des Defi wirklich die Verbandsgemeinde? Soweit ich weiß gibt es einen Trägerverein dafür.
vg
s6mables (2021-02-07 10:10:56+00:00): Hey,
das kann sein. Eventuell ist es die "Bürgerstiftung Bernkastel-Kues".
Ich habe die Verbandsgemeinde hier getaggt, da in den "Mittelmosel Nachrichten" angegeben ist, dass die VG nach jedem Gebrauch des Defi, informiert werden sollte - daher bin ich erstmal von ihr als "operator" ausgegangen.
Siehe beispielsweise hier:
https://ol.wittich.de/titel/704/ausgabe/5/2021/artikel/00000000000024999595-OL-704-2021-5-5-0
Viele Grüße
ma-rt-in (2021-02-07 10:16:48+00:00): Allgemein ist es die Bürgerstiftung, die sind aber nicht immer Betreiber der Geräte. Auch wenn in der verlinkten Liste zBsp Minheim aufgeführt ist, so ist dort jedoch der Förderverein der Feuerwehr Betreiber des Geräts. Nur die Wartung/etc. läuft über die Stiftung bzw. die Verbandsgemeinde.

vg
stefanct (2021-02-05 04:48:19+00:00): Hallo Rene und willkommen auf OSM!

Bitte den name-Key nur verwenden, wenn Objekte einen Eigennamen haben (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name).
Für Stiegennummern verwenden wir üblicherweise addr:unit.

LG
eggie (2021-02-04 11:36:04+00:00): Eddy.. Lijkt me allemaal oke zo.
Gr eggie
Edmundus (2021-02-05 18:49:12+00:00): Dankjewel voor de geruststellende opmerking.
Inmiddels ben ik nog wet verder gegaan. Ik krijg bij de verificatie steeds de melding dat er een probleem is met de kruising van de waterweg met enerzijds de Terborgseweg en anderzijds de Doetinchemseweg.
eggie (2021-02-05 18:55:46+00:00): Zowel bij de culvert Terborgseweg en de Doetinchemseweg ontbreekt layer=-1 op de duiker.
Dat veroorzaakt de foutmedling.
Pas je het zelf aan?

MVG
eggie
Edmundus (2021-02-06 08:20:01+00:00): Inderdaad, dat zal het zijn. Inmiddels heb ik het aangepast. Ook bij de vijf andere duikers, die de boer gebruikt om van het ene op het andere weiland te komen, heb ik layer=-1 getagd.
Hartelijk dank voor de hulp, Eddy.
eggie (2021-02-03 20:37:18+00:00): Dag Bert.. Het is in dit geval gebruikelijk om access=private te taggen.. acccess=no is een gebiedsverbod. Denk aan militaire terreinen..
Mvg
Eggie
skquinn (2021-02-04 01:45:28+00:00): What is your data source for the changes to the boundary of Sugar Land?
eggie (2021-02-03 21:02:45+00:00): driveway is prima ... access=no even veranderen in access=private..
gr eggie
Jacques Lavignotte (2021-02-03 22:15:47+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est l'un ou l'autre ;)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses

Pour ma part je préfère l'adresse sur un point du bâtiment 

addr:housenumber=31
addr:street=Rue du Champ Joli

et donc à retirer du polygone.

En passant : il est inutile de porter :

addr:city=Tours
addr:postcode=37000

car OSM 'sait' que cet immeuble est sur la commune de Tours/37. Oui, je sais, ID le propose mais c'est une autre histoire :)

Continuez à mapper ! 

Si besoin vous trouverez de l’aide dans la liste de diffusion Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ou sur notre salon IRC (serveur : irc.oftc.net, salon #osm-fr)

Cordialement, Jacques
NicoL3AS (2021-02-03 22:30:31+00:00): Ok, j'ai modifié pour correpsondre à votre réponse. Merci !
limes11 (2021-02-03 21:48:10+00:00): Da gibt es keine Einigkeit. Die Defaults hier

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

sind ein proposal, das nie angenommen wurde. Die meisten Router kuemmern sich nicht um laenderspezifische Sonderlocken. Hier 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

wird das auch diskutiert. 

Im Endeffekt kann man nicht wirklich davon ausgehen, dass access Tags auf hw=track korrekt ausgewertet werden. motor_vehicle=destination setze ich immer, wenn es so beschildert ist. access=destination ist natuerlich Quatsch.
VG, Limes
limes11 (2021-02-03 21:49:10+00:00): Sorry, ich meinte, die Auswertung von access auf hw=track ohne Zusatz-Tags ist problematisch. Tags auf hw=track werden natuerlich ausgewertet.
kreuzschnabel (2021-02-04 07:20:41+00:00): Gegen ein motor_vehicle=destination habe ich nichts einzuwenden (wenn auch meist kein "Anlieger frei" beschildert ist und daher streng genommen motor_vehicle=no gilt). Aber das hier vorliegende access-Tagging war halt falsch, weil es zb Reiter auch ausgeschlossen hat. Die werden bei der "Hintenrum-methode" (erst mal access=no taggen und dann einzeln wieder erlauben, was ich riskant finde) ja meist vergessen.
FraukeLeo (2021-02-04 07:42:23+00:00): Genau, hier hat mindestens horse=yes gefehlt. An vielen Feldwegen ist außerdem gar nicht Zeichen 260, sondern 250 beschildert, also vehicle=no, obwohl 260 gemeint ist, und das dann nötige Zusatzschild "Radfahrer frei" wird gern vergessen. Da gehe ich aber dann großzügig davon aus, dass es gemeint ist.
TomCerts (2021-02-03 22:27:00+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery, Ground Survey
itineris (2021-02-08 10:22:12+00:00): Szia!

Az OSM-be csak más számára is észlelhető, ellenőrizhető objektumokat veszünk fel. Az általad berajzolt útvonal ráadásul már meglevő utak tetejére került duplán. Ha a síneken át a Radnóti utca kanyarjához létezik kitaposott ösvény, akkor elég csak azt a szakaszt berajzolni - az úttestekbe csatlakozva -, és Ösvény-nek címkézni.

Üdv:
Ákos
user_5359 (2021-02-04 04:51:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved same nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
See https://www.osm.org/node/64030149/history
Please check the information, I try to insert your wanted modifications
kubahahaha (2021-02-09 15:15:05+00:00): Jest tam gdzieś nazwa warzywniak (szyld)? Jak nie ma to wystarczy sam tag opisujący że to sklep z warzywami
user_5359 (2021-02-05 19:12:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/484875579: We tyo different keys for email and phone, but your second information isn't any email address.
ottwiz (2021-02-03 22:44:21+00:00): Oh yes, by the way it's not a problem if you cleanup after me, I appreciate it if it's made better. Maybe it causes a little bit of hassle. Btw, check out your dms in Slack.
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-07-07 08:51:25+00:00): Hola, cami031098. Espero que estés bien.

Este ID de relación: 12272258 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12272258) está marcado como restricción de turno, pero no está bien formado: Falta un miembro de origen y destino. No puedo arreglarlo porque no pude encontrar imágenes para arreglarlo. ¿Te importaría arreglarlo?
Gracias
letihu (2021-08-06 15:32:13+00:00): Hallo,
mappe doch bitte bei einem Wasserdurchgang, z. B. hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903582193/history
tunnel:culvert
und vergesse layer:-1 nicht.
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/713004055/history
und an vielen anderen Wasserläufen  
ist tunnel:no getaggt. Dass ist natürlich nicht nötig.
pio2_122 (2021-02-04 08:02:32+00:00): Wg mnie nadal jest to błędny adres.
Prosiłem o weryfikowanie adresów z geoportalem krajowym i zgłaszanie problemów z adresami. Wydaje mi się, że tego nie robisz...

Adres z danych urzędowych to: „Turza, Kościelna 20”, nie „Myślina, Kościelna 20”. Zresztą, taki już był dodany wcześniej w OSM.
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 19:26:44+00:00): Fiction, does not match Bing as claimed nor any other available imagery. 
DWG Ticket#2021032110000101
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 22:56:00+00:00): Reverted as follows:
US: FL: Revert Fiction. DWG Ticket#2021032110000101. 
 
CS: 98719497, 98671779, 98668355, 98149401, 98149029 in CS 101456303
CS: 98148470, 93189173 in CS 101456762
CS: 93129376, 93129079 in CS 101456971
CS: 92907485 92910530, manual repairs in CS 101459803
opendcc (2021-02-04 07:53:17+00:00): Hallo, die Pfarrei Rattenkirchen führt die Kirche in Wald als St. Florian: https://www.erzbistum-muenchen.de/pfarrei/pv-ampfing/cont/57335
Kovoschiz (2021-02-04 14:53:30+00:00): It appears that there's no physical island here, so it was left as a single line without splitting.
Footyfootfella (2021-02-04 21:08:04+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz,
Thank you for reaching out. I will change this road back to bi-directional.
-Footyfootfella
AntMadeira (2021-02-05 01:33:03+00:00): Olá, Dikel Sousa.
Espero encontrar-te bem.

Podes explicar o que queres dizer com "Estrada actualmente secundária" e o que te levou a alterar este troço de terciária para secundária?
Chamo a atenção para a padronização das estradas em Portugal, que te poderá ajudar a classificar as estradas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o#Estradas

Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António.
eggie (2021-02-04 06:15:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Review..  Is het niet gewoon receptie?

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2021-02-04 09:11:39+00:00): Problems?

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79025&lat=-32.92791&zoom=18

I'll leave you to figure it out.
Imaginashun (2021-02-05 16:36:22+00:00): Source correction: Esri World Imagery; Strava
keithonearth (2022-01-29 00:13:12+00:00): Based on this article: https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/city-of-burnaby-mountain-sfu-gondola-route-selection-official

The route as mapped is accurate, and now approved.
Warin61 (2021-02-10 23:39:52+00:00): Err no ... still

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79025&lat=-32.92791&zoom=18

I'll leave you to figure it out. I would delete the relation! The park looks like it already exists as it is named on the map!
GerdP (2023-10-12 07:18:15+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Welcher Name stimmt?
"Kleine Rönnecken" oder
"Kleine Rönneken" (ohne c)
https://www.osm.org/way/903600345
https://www.osm.org/way/903600343
abcgaertner (2023-12-25 15:23:13+00:00): Moin zurück aus Bremen und Frohes Fest,
Rönnecken mit "c" ist richtig. ich werde den Rechtschreibfehler beizeiten korrigieren, wenn ich in der Ecke was zu mappen habe.
JoeG (2021-05-01 07:04:12+00:00): Is it correct that the path from knaggs crs to Birrell st is not lit? There's an OSM note that says that it is, and it does look like there are lampposts in the imagery?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38745388
M!dgard (2021-02-07 11:59:58+00:00): Mag ik u vragen gebouwen die ik al uit het GRB heb overgenomen, zoals bij Kerkstraat 157, niet te "verbeteren"? De aanpassing uit het GRB is met goede reden en terreinstudie uitgevoerd.
eggie (2021-02-04 06:38:17+00:00): Hi Guy..
I changed =unclassified into highway=service

Greetz,
eggie
!bm (2021-02-10 00:26:53+00:00): Hallo hfs,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du (in Berlin) einige solcher landuses gelöscht hast – im konkreten Fall: wieso nicht landuse=religious? Das scheint hier die vorherrschende Nutzung zu sein, wenn es nach Gebäuden geht. 

Beachte auch, dass in etlichen Gegenden Berlins die landuse=residential an der Bordsteinkante orientiert ist (und wo es wie hier inkorrekt ist, evt auch reines Tagging für den Renderer vorliegt) – man könnte also mittels ALKIS-Bauwerke-Layer prüfen, ob stattdessen barrier=kerb zutrifft. (Hier nur sehr ungenau.)

--besteGrüße!bm
Reeniz (2021-02-04 00:34:17+00:00): Hola JJ, haz cambiado un village por salvavidas en Perú. Es esto correcto?
Saludos
JJIglesias (2021-02-04 03:41:18+00:00): No, y tal cambio fue totalmente No intencional, pues no estaba editando Peru para nada.
Ni idea como hice ese cambio pero ya volvi a colocar el pueblo como village
Gracias por notar ese error
Saludos
JJ
user_5359 (2021-02-05 18:58:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/903608917 (one of three ways): What is the meqning of the tag "Kaltenhofer"="Moor"?
seawolff (2021-02-06 12:42:03+00:00): Hello,
this was an error using copy&paste.
"Kaltenhofer Moor" is a name.
Corrected.
MxxCon (2021-02-04 04:15:08+00:00): Hello.
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=baseball#How_to_Map_Baseball_Fields when mapping baseball fields, you should include the whole play field, and not just the infield area. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98670979
akadouri (2021-02-04 04:44:00+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. The whole area is a bit ambiguous here but I updated the extents to be larger. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98677541

As well as some other features I recently added
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903610265
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903609894

Let me know if those look ok.
ZLima12 (2022-04-30 22:52:22+00:00): Hi,

I think that this data is better suited for OpenHistoricalMap. OSM is supposed to be for things that currently exist.

I know that you've added other routes like this. Why are you adding them? Is it for Wikipedia? If so, I know that there's another way to create maps for it (has to do with KML I believe), so please look at this when adding map data to Wikipedia pages.

I would like to eventually remove these old routes from OSM, or at least the ones that have no trace left in the real world. For example, something like historic US-66 should remain on the map, since it's currently signed as such. If you're using this data for Wikipedia pages, I'll wait a while so that you can transfer the data.

I appreciate the work that you're putting in, but there are consequences to mapping old features like this. Some maps are rendering these route numbers, which is definitely not good for users.

Thanks,
John
BMACS001 (2022-04-30 23:43:03+00:00): Makes sense. I think the data in question is already ported to Wikipedia, so knock yourself out
ZLima12 (2022-05-04 02:21:15+00:00): I just noticed that this changeset contains a lot more than just that route I was talking about. To be specific, I'm looking at Old NY-356.
mariotomo (2021-02-05 00:11:32+00:00): hola. gracias por apoyar el mapa. acuérdate que aquí es un proyecto de grupo, y habrá maperos revisando. es útil presentar las ediciones con un verbo de acción y un objeto, como en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98490166
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:46:41+00:00): #TIP: instead of drawing a polygon for the business, just add a node inside of the building outline. At some point in the future we will have the ability to do indoor mapping. Just not ready yet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98671428
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:55:55+00:00): According to the city the road between Broadway and 3rd Ave is an alley. Can you recheck your edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98671649
Undearius (2021-02-04 01:10:47+00:00): If this turns out awful, go ahead and revert this
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:48:25+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98671725
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:49:13+00:00): #TIP: Parking lots still need access. Can you add the service road back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98671747
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 19:28:20+00:00): Fiction, does not match Bing as claimed nor any other available imagery. 
DWG Ticket#2021032110000101
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 22:55:54+00:00): Reverted as follows:
US: FL: Revert Fiction. DWG Ticket#2021032110000101. 
 
CS: 98719497, 98671779, 98668355, 98149401, 98149029 in CS 101456303
CS: 98148470, 93189173 in CS 101456762
CS: 93129376, 93129079 in CS 101456971
CS: 92907485 92910530, manual repairs in CS 101459803
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:58:07+00:00): #TIP: That maybe a service road. Unclassified are basically rural residential roads typically maintained by the county. Can you recheck the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98672289
mkopinsky (2023-08-24 16:35:53+00:00): This changeset added West Armstrong Lake Trail and  as well as S Amstron Trail. Can you confirm whether that second street is indeed Amstron without a g? (And that its name does not have the word Lake?)
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:01:05+00:00): #TIP: The cover over the gas pumps are typically mapped as a building=roof + layer=1. Can you add these tags to the roof?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98672480
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:02:41+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98672630
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-04 05:20:12+00:00): the reason I put `name:mi=Te Wharau o Tāmaki` on the building is because that's the Te Reo name of this office, 'Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau' is Te Reo Māori for Auckland Council (as an organisation). 

so I think that tag was correct as it was? It's signposted near the low-rise elevators
NyanSten (2021-02-04 05:40:53+00:00): Oh, I see. Yes, if it is the name written OTG then that is the one that should be used. Is the English name OTG Auckland Council? Searching for it, it looks like the name of the building is actually Auckland House.
NyanSten (2021-02-04 05:42:30+00:00): If that is the case, it would be useful to split the government Auckland Council / Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau and the building Auckland House / Te Wharau o Tāmaki.