piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sommerluk (2018-01-20 06:34:10+00:00): Bonjour Manu Stefan.

Merci de contribuer à OSM et pour tes contributions en Abidjan !

J’avais remarqué qu’ici des zones avec des bâtiments ont été marqués avec building=yes, mais je pensais que building=yes est uniquement pour des bâtiments individuels, pas pour des blocs de bâtiments (parfois un peu difficile à reconnaitre sur l’image satellite)…

En tous cas bienvenue en Abidjan !

Cordialement
eggie (2018-01-12 15:13:28+00:00): De namen van de restaurants zou je kunnen toevoegen.
Nu heb je dat restaurant op nr 2 nog een keer toegevoegd maar wel op de juiste wijze.. op de adresnode.
eggie (2018-01-12 15:08:09+00:00): Hier heb je  een serviceroad door getrokken over de gebouwen heen. Waarom?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55381022
eggie (2018-01-12 15:10:33+00:00): Deze bijdrage heb ik teruggedraaid.
eggie (2018-01-12 15:11:11+00:00): reverted Wijzigingenset #55382817
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-22 17:36:37+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! It appears you've moved the soccer field in a way clearly incompatible with the aerial imagery. I have undone the change. Perhaps you only meant to move the name "Sportek" from the park on the left to the soccer field on the right?
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:17:48+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381045
eggie (2018-01-12 15:06:20+00:00): Hier zou je commentaar kunnen zijn School toegevoegd  met naam.
eggie (2018-01-12 16:11:36+00:00): Nuttige bijdrage.. 
Het vlak heb ik losgemaakt van het gebouwtje links. De amenity school heb ik van het gebouw gehaald anders is het 2x een schooltag.
eggie (2018-01-12 15:04:36+00:00): actualisering zegt niemand iets. Graag concreet commentaar.
heet het Bedrijvengebied nu werkelijk Beele en niet meet 't Broek. Graag reactie
eggie (2018-01-12 15:39:40+00:00): Deze bijdrage draai ik ook terug. Je hebt het hele bedrijventerrein genoemd naar één bedrijf op dit terrein. Dat kan toch niet de bedoeling zijn?
eggie (2018-01-12 15:40:50+00:00): reverted by · Wijzigingenset #55383613
eggie (2018-01-12 15:59:19+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. beginnersfoutjes worden je niet kwalijk genomen. Je kunt het hokje aanvinken  bij opslaan met de tekst "Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”

.. en gebruik de pdok luchtfoto.. De BING ligt verschoven.
Wel graag een reactie zodat we weten dat je er nota van hebt genomen.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:55:04+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381114
Nakaner (2018-01-15 11:12:20+00:00): Hallo rurseekatze,

ich weiß nicht, ob tux67 und all die anderen, in meinen Augen erfahrenen Mapper, so erfreut darüber sind, dass sie mit automatischen OSMCha-Nachrichten zugespammt werden. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-January/080006.html

Viele Grüße

Michael
tux67 (2018-01-15 12:31:31+00:00): Ja .. das wä'r nett, wenn die Nachrichten je nach review manuell eingeschaltet werden könnten. Bei dieser Massenaktion Telefonnummern zu begradigen fällt auf, wie nervig das mit den Mails ist. 
Aber wenn rurseekatze wirklich einen Vorher- Nacher Vergleich meiner Rufnummern macht .. Hut ab .. 
Mir hat schon die Korrektur im kleinen Umfeld ein paar graue Haare gebracht ;-)

Gruß
Stephan
rurseekatze (2018-01-28 12:05:13+00:00): Hallo,

es war mir nicht klar, dass OSMCha jedes Mal einen Changesetkommentar hinterlässt. Das sorgt in der Tat für ziemlichen Spam. Ausschalten kann man das derzeit ja leider nicht, sonst würde ich das definitiv machen.
Die Rufnummern vergleiche ich nicht Ziffer für Ziffer, ich klicke mich nur schnell durch die Changesets und verifiziere, wenn ich sehe, dass sich da kein offensichtlicher Vandalismus hinter versteckt. Deine Changesets reviewe ich auch eher, um die Liste der Changesets in OSMCha "aufzuräumen", weil es anscheinend ja keine Möglichkeit gibt, bestimmte User auf eine Whitelist zu setzen.

Gruß
Alex
bhousel (2018-01-12 14:43:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381269
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:54:16+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381271
Xish Xehman Bangladesh (2018-01-16 21:49:57+00:00): Sir Its real map and locations pls keep it...
sir um born in this upazilaaa so I know all about of information..
Some others guys link and tag wrong address and information written in some maps.. so I am writing here real address and locations..
*Martin* (2018-01-12 14:20:34+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381427
maraf24 (2018-01-13 16:08:23+00:00): Hej MacieXMAP
Zaraz po narysowaniu budynku naciśnij S - spowoduje to wyprostowanie kątów.
W tej chwili wszystkie wyrysowane przez Ciebie budynki są bardzo krzywe - sam zobacz.
*Martin* (2018-01-13 20:37:56+00:00): Buildings are not only dissorted, but often larger area surrounding the building is tagged as a building.
*Martin* (2018-01-12 14:26:34+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381507
johnny_1982 (2018-01-13 23:29:21+00:00): Die neu erstellte Grünfläche überlappt/überschneidet sich mit den bestehenden Gebäuden. Bitte korrigieren und in Zukunft drauf achten.
David Jasko (2018-01-15 12:56:51+00:00): Grünfläche wurde angepasst und mit den Gebäudepunkten verbunden
Pannenfuchs (2018-01-20 14:12:43+00:00): Hmmm, imho sind die Gebäude nun nicht mehr korrekt eingezeichnet.
David Jasko (2018-01-22 07:55:54+00:00): Dem muss ich beipflichten. Die linken Gebäude wurden an die Grünfläche angepasst bei einem Zoomfaktor von 15m. Bei einem Zoomfaktor von größer 20m ist dies nicht korrekt dargestellt. Zurzeit kann ich dies so nicht beheben. Ich werde es aber an eine der Zoom Optionen anpassen und vereinheitlichen.
johnny_1982 (2018-01-22 21:01:13+00:00): Die neuerliche Änderung "verformt" Hausnummer 19. Das Gebäude hat seine rechten Winkel verloren. Das kann man hier nachsehen: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55461495
Wenn nun der Innenhof komplett grün ist, würde ich dort nicht die Eingänge zu den Häusern 13, 15, 17, 19 und 21 vermuten.
johnny_1982 (2018-01-22 21:31:02+00:00): Ich habe nun die westlichen Gebäude manuell zurück geändert und einen Fußweg hinzugefügt. Damit sollte dies erledigt sein.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:17:35+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381555
viloan (2018-01-12 14:22:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
johnny_1982 (2018-01-13 23:24:37+00:00): Ist das denn wirklich eine Grünfläche? Nur zum Teil! Wenn du dir das mal vor Ort ansiehst, wirst du sehen, dass es eher ein kleiner Platz ist, inklusive Rampe und Treppen. Diese Fläche dient dem Zugang zum Einkaufszentrum, Sparkasse, usw. Auf den verschiedenen(!) Luftbildern kann man das auch erkennen.
Pannenfuchs (2018-01-20 13:51:31+00:00): Hier ist keine Grünfläche.
johnny_1982 (2018-01-13 23:17:37+00:00): Hallo David, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Was war denn an der alten Darstellung des Spielplatzes so schlecht? Du hast ihn vergrößert, so dass er sich mit dem Sportplatz überlappt. (Wenn dich der Spalt zwischen Sportplatz und Spielplatz gestört hätte, dann hättest du sie auch "zusammenkleben" können, ohne Überlappung. Der Spielplatz ist nun so groß, dass der Fußweg/Radweg DURCH den Spielplatz verläuft. Und das ist definitiv falsch!
Pannenfuchs (2018-01-20 13:49:02+00:00): Das sehe ich auch so. Der Fuß/Radweg verläuft allerdings auch etwas dichter an der Strasse. Dennoch ist die Grenze des Spielplatzes so nicht richtig. Ich würde den Weg noch einmal tracken und genau eintragen und dann die Grenzen korrigieren?
johnny_1982 (2018-01-25 15:59:36+00:00): Ich habe ungefähr den alten Zustand wiederhergestellt.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:17:21+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55381703
Hbkstorm (2018-01-12 14:45:15+00:00): Pokémon go
JJIglesias (2018-01-12 21:10:20+00:00): Gracias por la Edicion en #OSM_BO, te sabras algunos nombres de calles en Caiza D?
Slds
JJ
user_5359 (2018-01-12 18:58:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/313540383/history
roptat (2018-01-12 16:43:18+00:00): Le nom ne devrait pas être entièrement en majuscule. J'ai regardé le reste de tes changements jusque là et ça m'a l'air très bien :)
Minotaure (2018-01-12 16:53:40+00:00): Merci.
J'essaie de m'améliorer....
Johnny Mapperseed (2018-01-12 14:55:21+00:00): Minor mistake in changeset comment due to sleeplessness. I used Digital Globe sat imagery as well.
Mike Baggaley (2018-01-22 08:57:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to Open Street Map.
This changeset has changed some of Wolverhampton Street from secondary to primary. However, the ways also have a ref of B4587. Is this now an A road? If so, please change the ref. If it is still the B4587, please revert the highway type to secondary as per the UK mapping guidelines (A roads are primary or trunk, B roads are secondary).

Thanks,
Mike
whitetop666 (2018-01-22 12:14:41+00:00): The road has been set to how google had it, if its been changed since i updated then by all means change it.
ToeBee (2018-03-14 22:19:06+00:00): We can not use any Google data to modify OpenStreetMap. This is a copyright violation. We can only use primary sources (your own eyes) or any source of data who has given us EXPLICIT permission to use their data.

Also, it seems like you deleted some data on this outline:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64972205/history 

It used to be a building with a supermarket. After your edit it is just a generic landuse=retail area. Is this correct? Did the store close and was the building torn down?
Hjart (2018-01-12 15:18:16+00:00): When mapping in Denmark, please use our national SDFE imagery (found in JOSM's imagery menu) as it's much more up to date and better quality than Bing.
projecter63 (2018-01-12 22:41:11+00:00): Hi,
yes, gladly - no problem; but I was just not sure, if this can be used under license for OSM. If so, where can I read this? With my additions I had in the background the SDFE imagery also opened ...

Greetings from Lübeck
Rainer alias projecter63
Hjart (2018-01-12 22:46:41+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Styrelsen_for_Dataforsyning_og_Effektivisering_.28SDFE.29

(Warning; the page is big and takes a long time to load)
projecter63 (2018-01-12 23:21:00+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the information.
I can not speak Danish, but according to the translator that does not sound so good:
"Kildeangivelse
Myndigheden håndhæver sin ophavsret. Når data anvendes skal brugeren:
 

    på et rimeligt sted egnet til distributionsmediet indsætte følgende:

     ”Indeholder data fra Styrelsen for Dataforsyning og Effektivisering”
    Navnet på datasættet(ene)
    Tidspunkt, hvor datasættet(ene) er hentet hos myndigheden, eller om der er tale om en datatjeneste.
    (fx: ”Indeholder data fra Styrelsen for Dataforsyning og Effektivisering, Kort10, januar 2016”. Eller: ”Indeholder data fra Geodatastyrelsen, Matrikelkortet, WMS-tjeneste”)

    sikre, at ”Styrelsen for Dataforsyning og Effektivisering” fremgår på forsiden af servicen, såfremt andre kilder også nævnes på forsiden
    stille en kopi af disse vilkår, evt. ved hjælp af et link, til rådighed for tredjepart".

It's not that I do not like the SDFE imagery - the pictures are really much better than BING's - but the question is:
Can OSM really fulfill these requirements with its - exclusively own - source (© OpenStreetMap contributors) ???

greetings
Rainer alias projecter63
Hjart (2018-01-12 23:28:49+00:00): As I read the text, it's quite OK for OSM to use it.
SDFE is mentioned on the wiki and we're linking to them.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Findvej was involved in the original talks with what is now called SDFE, so I suggest you ask him
projecter63 (2018-01-13 00:05:53+00:00): Well,
I only asked; if it is for you i.O., that's for me too. Please do not misunderstand now: One of the basic rules in OSM is: "Local Mapper first" ;-). 
Last question: how to attribute in the future? "(knowledge, survey, or anything else), SDFE imagery"? Correctly?
Happy mapping ... and good night
greetings
Rainer alias projecter63
user_5359 (2018-01-12 18:44:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suggest as a possible better solution: landuse=commerical instead area=yes. And please add the information as nodes with amenity=dentist, etc.
user_5359 (2018-01-12 17:51:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
eggie (2018-04-06 15:59:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2018-01-12 17:50:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
0000FF berries (2018-01-12 16:03:36+00:00): Hi mikbak747, welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

Please don't delete things that other people have added just because you think they are unnecessary. You have deleted some perfectly good edits (pedestrian crossings, hedges - http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55382958). Pedestrian crossings and sidewalks are used for pedestrian routing. People also map things like benches, wastebaskets, fire hydrants. If they exist on the ground, they have every right to be on the map. Don't delete them.

Please first read the wiki first, read the good practice tips (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice), ask at https://help.openstreetmap.org. We also have a Greek forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 

We welcome you to improve the map and looking forward to see more changes that preserve the quality of the map. Thank you.
mikbak747 (2018-01-12 17:55:37+00:00): Thanks for letting me know about any mistakes I made. I did not make any change on the map before I read the wiki. Eg. for the side walks, the architecture of the road does not require separate line. I live in the vicinity, I appreciate the project and I also believe it requires some quality edits. I will replace some missing crossings and whatever POI deleted does not exist anymore. I will contact the Greek forum and I will welcome any comment to improve my edits. 
Thanks.
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-01-12 16:15:32+00:00): Witamy w szeregach :)
ianlopez1115 (2018-01-12 15:27:07+00:00): *update lane count
daganzdaanda (2018-01-16 20:19:37+00:00): Hallo Difoltuser, ich habe die neuen Häuser von den Bing-Bildern abmalen können (die sind grad erneuert worden, Fotos von ca Mitte 2017) 
Kommst du da mal wieder vorbei und kannst nachschauen, ob das Zone 30 oder Spielstraßen sind?
Alecs01 (2018-01-13 13:33:51+00:00): Ciao, attenzione a quale oggetto selezioni, hai trasformato in playground un'area molto grande: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2191430/history ho corretto ora
343H (2018-01-15 15:37:53+00:00): Ciao! grazie per l'aiuto..probabilmente ho sbagliato a cliccare l'area del parchetto
Digne (2018-01-13 14:33:28+00:00): Hallo YusufDHL,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd.

Ik heb geen opmerkingen. Het ziet er wat mij betreft goed uit.
SomeoneElse (2018-01-12 16:24:50+00:00): Hello BlinkingNora,
Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219187602/history is commercial?  It doesn't look it on the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy
BlinkingNora (2018-01-12 16:26:12+00:00): Hello Andy, yes the imagery is rather outdated as a lot of shops and other retailers have opened up right near the Body Shop down the road. :)
SomeoneElse (2018-01-12 16:34:12+00:00): Thanks!  Are there still houses at the western end?  If so you could split it in two and have residential at once side and commercial at the other.
BlinkingNora (2018-01-12 16:35:55+00:00): Hmmm, not sure of the specific details. I'll be visiting next week so will be sure to take some photos to make edits when I'm next back on my PC. (Not sure what OSM editor is available on Android)
SomeoneElse (2018-01-12 16:38:52+00:00): I've heard people recommend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vespucci as an Android editor, but not used it myself.
BlinkingNora (2018-01-12 16:39:31+00:00): My thanks! I'll be sure to check it out sometime :D
maraf24 (2018-01-14 11:51:24+00:00): Wycofane w całości.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Sd5605 (2025-11-29 20:00:20+00:00): shop=bookmaker是簽注站，出版社是office=publisher。
mapper999 (2018-01-23 20:38:30+00:00): Hallo knowname,
bitte nochmal die Öffnungszeiten hiermit kontrollieren: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ 
Aktuell ist die Änderungsschneiderei den ganzen Samstag geöffnet, war das wirklich so gemeint?
knowname (2018-01-24 00:10:54+00:00): Hi mapper999,
Ja, Samstags nach Vereinbarung.
Wird bei unspezifischen und nicht besser abbildbaren Öffnungszeiten meines    Wissens auch so gemappt. 
Ich sehe gerade nur dass ich das hätte auf Deustch schreiben sollen :)
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification ganz unten.
mapper999 (2018-01-24 19:17:39+00:00): Hi,
richtig wäre dann:
Mo-Fr 09:00-17:30; Sa "on appointment"; Su off
Das || bedeutet, dass diese Regel zu allen Zeiten gilt, die vorher nicht angegeben wurden, also nur Mo-Fr nachts.
knowname (2018-01-24 20:09:08+00:00): Ah Mist du hast Recht.
Ändere ich später gleich.
vng_me (2018-01-12 19:23:09+00:00): Этот угловой дом скорее всего имеет двойной адрес?
iandees (2018-01-12 17:02:59+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55383958