piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-11 09:56:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
look at this picture:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ge-tNEWKQR_arhRunlwgrMNJ3fWDhSCH/view?usp=sharing
Red lined mappings are yours. exept the big building on the right side.
* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127333182
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
tastrax (2022-10-24 02:12:50+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Frans S (2022-10-11 10:02:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped on this changeset. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
I reviewed a number of your mappings. The quality differs between the changesets. Some are well mapped, others shows issues. I copied you a picture which explains some issues.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127334023
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-11 08:30:28+00:00): Please understand that it is considered a `place=island`, not `=town`. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9279538
IJMacD (2022-10-11 08:58:04+00:00): I am of course aware that the island is an island. It has been tagged as such in the relation you linked.

However I think the locality in the centre of the island can be considered a town. My reasoning is that people living on the island would give their address as one of the hamlets, then "Peng Chau". e.g. "Tai Wo Tsuen, Peng Chau, Hong Kong"

Currently if you do address lookups on Nominatim it gives the town as "Discovery Bay" which is certainly wrong.

I looked for other examples of towns on islands around the world before making the edit.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-11 10:04:35+00:00): 1. This would be a problem on Nominatm. It should return the island's name when there is one, as it is important as an address. However that's not what they do, so I don't understand what's their logic. https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/1746 But it would be exhaustive and redundant to add a `=town` to every `=island`. Here, the important "Lantau Island" isn't listed for addresses on it either.  That needs to be fixed first. This might help contain Discovery Bay within it.  Unfortunately, the situation is Lantau Island is splitted between 3 District Council districts. I need to check how to handle this. 
2. The problem here is there is no `boundary=administrative` below `admin_level=6 `anywhere, which in reality isn't even used for addressing. But adding `place=town` around might not  solve it. On the contrary. you might cause Peng Chau to be returned on Lantau Island around the triangle intersection with Discovery Bay and Mui Wo, if Tai Shui Hang is downgraded from `=village` ( it should probably be a `=hamlet`) Discovery Bay is already returned for Disneyland in Penny's Bay, and the north shore on the other side of the mountain. That's clearly wrong too. 
3. You did say "towns on islands". I need to review the definition for major populated islands here.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-11 10:08:42+00:00): (Btw if you are using your own instance, you could adjust how it works)
Kovoschiz (2022-10-11 11:08:55+00:00): 1. Another example is Chek Lap Kok  being included in Tung Chung
silversurfer83 (2022-10-11 07:04:43+00:00): Moinsen :)
nur mal für mich als nicht-Bahn-Nerd: Warum werden die Relationen nicht mehr benötigt?
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127334435
user_10241830 (2022-10-11 08:23:09+00:00): Hallo,

beide Relationen sind vollredundant zur bereits bestehenden Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2535006
Aus diesem Grund werden sie nicht benötigt und können weg.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-11 09:00:49+00:00): Danke :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Frans S (2022-11-02 13:21:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You changed the tag of a few roads, highway=unclassified, into highway=residential.
Except in a few hamlets, these roads go through countryside.
Residential is to be used in urban, (town, villages etc.)
Best regards
Shrestha Shristi (2023-12-07 11:44:39+00:00): Thank you Frans for informing my mistakes, back then I was a beginner mapper. Now on won't repeat it.
kabelhaai (2026-01-09 18:43:27+00:00): Hi, you added names to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387439966/history/4 but forgot to omit the noname tag. Is this a mistake?
JasonBob (2022-10-11 17:10:06+00:00): What is the basis for this name change? I can't find anything on it online or elsewhere.
Leo Slager (2022-10-11 11:52:05+00:00): Dag Sander,
Na de BAG update (in 5 changesets) staat Edam vol met ca 100 self-intersecting ways.
Dat kun je hier zien:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.06384&lat=52.50725&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.80&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Als gevolg daarvan kunnen de gebouwen niet meer op de kaart getoond worden.
Ik heb geen idee van de oorzaak van deze fout.
De beste oplossing lijkt mij deze 5 changesets te reverten.
Graag een reactie.
Sander H (2022-10-11 14:11:20+00:00): In die changesets zit best veel werk, ga wel even kijken hoe eea te corrigeren, dat lijkt me gemakkelijker...
Sander H (2022-10-11 14:21:28+00:00): Lijkt niks aan de hand, als ik er een paar nakijk is alles OK. Lijkt alsof de OSM inspector halverwege m'n changeset (die is opgebroken in 5 stuks) een deel gemist heeft gezien de cutoff tijd van 06:00 UTC, dus denk dat die morgen weer goed staan allemaal.
Leo Slager (2022-10-11 14:32:26+00:00): Dat zou geweldig goed nieuws zijn.
Sorry voor de overlast.
Sander H (2022-10-11 14:58:00+00:00): Geeft niet, is goed dat je erboven op zit.
Sander H (2022-10-12 05:38:14+00:00): En na de OSM inspector update van gisteravond zijn de issues ineens weg.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-10-12 05:25:19+00:00): What is LNG?
geozeisig (2022-10-12 06:01:05+00:00): Liquefied natural gas is natural gas that has been cooled down to liquid form. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:content%3DLNG
MxxCon (2022-10-12 06:20:29+00:00): Would be useful to have more descriptive changeset comments spanning Atlantic Ocean..
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
hdevine825 (2022-10-14 15:13:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for making your first edit on OSM! I see that you added the tag category=Vacation Rental, this tag does not fit into the standard tagging structure for accommodation locations on OSM. I looked at the OSM wiki and I think the best tagging would be as tourism=guest_house https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house

Changing this helps consumers of OSM data properly catalogue the business.
hdevine825 (2022-10-14 16:27:06+00:00): I just realized that I advised you on the wrong tag, I think tourism=chalet is the most accurate tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
Glassman (2022-10-11 17:54:26+00:00): Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrailhead#Basic_Trailhead_node for placing the trailhead node. I usually place it near the sign for the trail but it could also be at an information board.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127337735
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
AjBelnuovo (2022-11-22 19:08:53+00:00): Qual é a fonte do nome da Praça ?E como a rua 21 de Abril assumiu o lugar da rua 15 de Maio ?
petropouli (2022-11-28 22:44:06+00:00): 1) Fonte do nome da praça: https://www.facebook.com/prefsbc/photos/5896537897063705 ; 2) De acordo com os dados disponíveis no Geoportal de SBC, a área correspondente à Rua 15 de Maio foi desapropriada para as obras da rotatória/praça, restando o trecho correspondente à Rua 21 de Abril.
user_10241830 (2022-10-11 09:48:01+00:00): Hallo,

was ist der Sinn und Zweck dieser Änderung, mit dem die Adresse vom Gebäude auf einen eigenen Node übertragen wird? Was soll damit erreicht werden?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
gscholz (2022-10-14 08:30:51+00:00): Hi Siobkhan,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=33.33235&lat=36.16255&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127338272

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Siobkhan (2022-10-17 02:57:47+00:00): Hello Guido, 
done, I fixed it))
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:37:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127338353
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:52:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127338500
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
jeslop (2022-10-11 14:44:09+00:00): Saludos aytoponferrada, bienvenido a Osm.

Estás mapeando las cámaras de control con una etiqueta "name" que más bien parece una "description".

Echa un vistazo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres, ahí podrás ver todas las posibilidades de la etiqueta y a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:description.

Gracias por tus aportaciones.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
JasonBob (2022-10-11 16:53:32+00:00): What is the basis for renaming Dictionary Hill to Lookout Mountain? This is a famous place name in the area and I don't see any documentation that has reverted it to its 1800's name.