piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tatfahren (2022-10-29 21:14:29+00:00): Hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172665086 ist mal ein Ort als Beispiel, wo das an ziemlich jedem Haus umgesetzt wurde.
Tatfahren (2022-10-30 20:14:16+00:00): Der entrance tag war richtig, jetzt hättest du es nur noch verbinden müssen, damit dieser auch als Teil des Gebäudes gerendert werden kann.
https://youtu.be/jR3y346fuLw
Igor Bubelov (2022-10-28 12:29:47+00:00): Hi! Please use currency:XBT tag for future edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin
HellMap (2022-10-28 11:11:30+00:00): Hi, why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177033064/history ?
richlv (2022-11-10 20:01:13+00:00): Sveiki boomboom14, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.
Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?

Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :)
philippec (2023-02-05 12:38:10+00:00): Meerle parochiezaal
U hebt het hoekpunt verplaatst zodat de AED binnen komt te liggen.
Gelieve het GRB te gebruiken om gebouwen te tekenen.
Peer55 (2023-02-21 20:48:36+00:00): Excuses, ik zie je bericht nu pas. 
Het was niet de bedoeling natuurlijk de AED onbereikbaar te maken. Zeer klein dingetje, zal er overheen gekeken hebben. Momenteel valt de AED net aan de buitenkant van de muur, ik veronderstel dat u het teruggezet heeft? Ik gebruik altijd de online editor. Wat is een GRB?
philippec (2023-02-21 20:55:04+00:00): Grootschalig ReferentieBestand. De officiële kaart van Vlaanderen.  De elfde Background van boven te beginnen in ID.   De coördinaten zijn er juist, de geometrie van de gebouwen niet altijd. 
Ik neem u niets kwalijk, dat is normaal bij beginners.
Peer55 (2023-02-21 21:13:26+00:00): Ik heb al best veel toevoegingen gedaan aan allerlei zaken op OSM, maar deze kende ik nog niet. Is een mooie functie, zal ik zeker nog raadplegen!
DaveF (2022-10-28 19:54:41+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107462242
Is this definitely a cricket pitch?
Strange shape, small, rough grass.
SelfieCity (2022-10-30 20:21:35+00:00): Hi, BW5000, I think you've accidentally deleted part of the Intracoastal Waterway. Can we restore that shape please?
MxxCon (2022-10-28 04:55:27+00:00): fixed one thing but didn't notice so many other problems😳
👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128142446
Palolo (2022-10-27 19:03:51+00:00): Thanks for your first edit to OSM, please keep mapping.
Palolo (2022-10-27 19:05:03+00:00): Great job on your first edit to OSM, thank you. Please make sure to square building corners using the q key.
Frans S (2022-10-28 09:04:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Global Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings. Can you see from the imagery that an object is an appartment building?




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128142806
Frans S (2022-10-28 09:14:29+00:00): Another issue.
You map and tag residential areas wrongly.
Mapping and tagging residential areas are not requested acc to the instructions, but, if you map them, map them correct.
Standard, residential areas are just includes build areas and tagged as landuse=residential.
Name tags are put on a single node, tagging it as f.e. hamlet, village etc and name = ... 
See this wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Common_landuse_key_values_-_developed_land
I remove these taggings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128142806
Palolo (2022-10-27 19:06:11+00:00): Thank  you for helping map Tanzania. Please use the q key to make square corners on the buildings.
Mazda05 (2022-10-28 23:31:10+00:00): в чём заключается вандализм Mazda05, какие соглашения были нарушены или проигнорированы?
Mazda05 (2022-10-28 23:35:28+00:00): После вашего «reverting vandalism by Mazda05» остаются несоединённые и нетегированные nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128194264...
gscholz (2022-10-29 08:53:03+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=27.50461&lat=38.77523&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128132000

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-01 07:30:48+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl, 
this errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Diego Krein (2022-10-27 20:13:40+00:00): Muchas gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap.

Una buena práctica definida por la comunidad de OpenStreetMap, es en lo posible no usar abreviaturas.

Ver documentación:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name

Les recomiendo entrar a este grupo de Telegram donde podrán charlar con otros colaboradores y sacarse todas las dudas: https://t.me/osm_ar.

Si quieres ponerte en contacto con la comunidad argentina, donde puede consultar al respecto, puedes seguir este enlace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto

Gracias.
Hufkratzer (2022-10-28 10:40:29+00:00): Hi,
you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107519320 with leisure=horse_riding. This tag is for riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) but in the aerial view the area looks more like a riding arena, and riding arenas should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena).
Compare:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025575407 - this one mapped by you seems ok
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510936727 - a riding centre in your region with some riding arenas inside
funkyboris (2022-10-29 14:52:26+00:00): fixed
user_20731664 (2024-01-17 09:22:34+00:00): Pętla Wólka Węglowa była tam gdzie jest też zespół przystankowy Wólka Węglowa. Nigdy w tym miejscu nie było pętli
4004 (2022-11-01 13:33:17+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/128144737/ осторожнее с точками, тут вход уехал вместе со стеной
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 01:07:30+00:00): Are bike allowed on these sidewalks? As far I know, bikes are only allowed on the path on the south side of the street Illinois and Wall, at least that's what the map indicates. I know it is signed on that portion as well, but not this portion.
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 01:35:39+00:00): I'm not 100% sure if it's accurate here. According to what I've read on the explore Carbondale website, it's legal for children to ride bikes on sidewalks in non-business districts, so it is partially allowed in these areas. There may be a better tag for this, however, than just bicycle=yes since it's limited.

"In non-business districts, children under the age of 16 may ride on sidewalks on bikes with wheels smaller than 24 inches." (Link: https://www.explorecarbondale.com/719/Bicycle-Rules-and-Safety-Tips )
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 02:03:15+00:00): The problem with putting bike=yes on sidewalks is that they show up as bike paths on the OSM Cycle Map, and it will also be used by directional apps and put people on sidewalks when they really shouldn't. The blue implies that it is a general purpose bike trail.
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 02:10:17+00:00): That's fair. I'm currently looking into best practices for tagging bicycle access to get a better idea of how to do so in weird cases like this. There doesn't appear to be an official way to mark them as being limited to a certain class of people, but it also seems weird to mark them as "no" when it is explicitly legal for some. 

Not sure what the best option is here.
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 02:38:44+00:00): I suppose you could put "not specified" or just leave it blank.
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 02:42:56+00:00): How does that work in the bicycle app? I'm not familiar with it. If that works better than being explicitly marked yes then I will do that. 

I'm just sort of surprised because the default value for paths is already an implicit bicycle=yes and I didn't realise explicit vs. implicit made a meaningful difference.
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 03:05:55+00:00): well, RideWithGPS, for example, uses OSM data to give directions to cyclists, and it prioritizes routes with bikes lanes or bikes paths. Putting in the wrong data could put cyclist on a dangerous street or put them on a route where they are actually not allowed to go.
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 03:09:48+00:00): Good to know. I'm not a cyclist and not very familiar with those apps. I have gone and removed bicycle=yes from this area. I'll be a bit more judicious when marking that in the future
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-05 12:36:42+00:00): Co miało być przekazane tagiem operator:wikidata=AL061GD1?
Marek-M (2023-01-05 13:14:08+00:00): Poprawiłem zgodnie z szablonem Allegro OneBox
trasa_gd (2023-01-06 09:04:44+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny - poprostu skorzystałem z innego przykładu tego rodzaju parceli. Najwyraźniej nie do końca zgodnego.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:50+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
Frans S (2022-10-28 09:19:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
As a global Validator I review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.

* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128146220
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-08 05:27:59+00:00): Die Kombination HW=Footway mit bicycle=designated ergibt keinen Sinn. Sie existiert in D so nicht. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356372201
Bitte um Korrektur.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-28 14:33:10+00:00): are you aware that some of the buildings you deleted contained addresses? Buildings need to be edited first to preserve the history...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49359373
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49359345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49359359
SomeoneElse (2022-12-27 17:23:43+00:00): Thanks - I've moved the tags over (and removed the building tag) and removed the old site relation.  As you say, nothing really understood it.
JJIglesias (2022-10-27 22:51:55+00:00): Saludos.
Por favor NO BORRAR ningun Nodo de informacion de Poblacion.
Gracias
JJ
Andy Solón (2022-10-28 15:07:35+00:00): Perdon no estaba enterada pero vi que había una doble etiqueta
gracias por la aclaración sere más cuidadosa en el futuro
Strubbl (2022-11-17 17:10:00+00:00): Hi Müllers, du hast hier die Website so verändert, dass sie auf einen 404 Fehler führt. Sie muss mit Slash enden.

Also nicht https://www.stadt-barth.de/details/stamm/show/cafe-am-markt-1 sondern https://www.stadt-barth.de/details/stamm/show/cafe-am-markt-1/
Strubbl (2022-11-17 17:11:06+00:00): Ich habe das mal zurückgeändert wie es korrekt war
SomeoneElse (2022-10-31 12:16:52+00:00): With regard to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107572466/history#map=17/54.17017/-4.51272 it doesn't look like it matches the underlying imagery very well at all.
ovruni (2022-10-28 00:09:04+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado nuevamente varios objetos ficticios, por lo que se ha revertido estos cambios.
Saludos
nevw (2022-10-28 04:17:50+00:00): Hi, you are expected to map the footprint of the building and if it looks like a house, tag with building=house, etc.
A random shape over the building is sub optimal and of no use to the map.
streckenkundler (2022-10-29 16:51:27+00:00): Hallo Jochen,

kleine Nachfrage: warum plötzlich das bicycle=no, am Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37684741
ich bin durch
https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/9681847
drauf aufmerksam geworden.

Danke,

Sven
JochenB (2022-10-29 22:23:24+00:00): Keine Ahnung, vermutlich pure Dummhet meinerseits, ich komme mit dem ID als Editor nicht gut klar und hatte unterwegs keinen JOSM.

Das 'no' sollte an den Abschnitt Zwischen Naundorfer Atraße und den Knotenpunkt 63, dort ist der Gehweg ein reiner Gehweg, danach "Rad frei" und erst in diesem Abschnitt benutzungspflichtig.

Schön dass du den Fehler entdeckt hast! Ich habe es soeben korrigiert.
streckenkundler (2022-10-30 16:54:16+00:00): Hallo Joachen,

Na gerne doch...

Sven
user_10241830 (2022-10-28 05:19:14+00:00): Hallo,

für Straßen mit einem benutzungspflichtigen Radweg wo sich das Fahrradverbot für die Straße implizit aus der Existenz des benutzungspflichtigen Radwegs ergibt gibt es das spezielle bicycle=use_sidepath.

bicycle=no soll nur verwendet werden wo Radfahrer durch ein Verbotsschild ausdrücklich verboten sind.

Gruß,
eiskalt-glasklar
sarawaremono (2022-11-01 00:39:43+00:00): Danke! Hab ich so verändert.
user_11609320 (2022-10-27 23:09:23+00:00): the power poles go towards shoeshone
Jerry_W2k (2022-11-03 20:16:12+00:00): Stary Rynek wygląda przecudownie!
ameziol (2022-11-03 20:50:27+00:00): Dziękuję!! Bardzo przyjemnie sie takie rzeczy mapuje
SomeoneElse (2022-10-28 00:11:13+00:00): Also includes Strensall Common from survey 26/10/2022, tr9338a, and Earswick, New Earswick and Huntington from survey 27/10/2022, tr9342b.
edbedbe (2022-10-28 00:22:30+00:00): i added a lot of housenumbers that were currently missing. I also added some "Doppelhäuser". 
Source: Local Survey and Hessen ALKIS
paunofu (2022-10-28 07:04:38+00:00): Bon dia,

el pub Paddy O'Conell s'etiqueta com a bar, en osm les etiquetes bar i pub van al contrari del significat que nosaltres li donem.

Bar=Bar de copes (pub en castellà/valencià)
Pub=bar en castellà/valenicà
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128150663
GeoMechain (2022-10-28 02:10:01+00:00): Merci de compléter le POI existant au lieu de le dupliquer : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3120304892 . De plus merci de vous conformer aux règles en matière d'édition organisée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing_Guidelines & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing/Activities
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128150860
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2022-10-28 06:37:59+00:00): C'est corrigé

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
felipeeugenio (2022-10-28 11:22:59+00:00): Hola. Esto no es un sitio para pruebas. Por favor agregar elementos reales. Saludos
rhtb0 (2022-10-28 08:24:50+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
rbrtwhite (2023-09-18 19:03:11+00:00): The name Musqueamview šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm has been approved in principle, but is not yet formally adopted. As of now the name remains Trutch Street. The City of Vancouver is sharing updates at https://vancouver.ca/people-programs/vancouvers-journey-towards-reconciliation.aspx
Diacritic (2022-10-28 04:14:56+00:00): Hey Volga. :)

All sources I can find online refer to this park as "Wenden Road Park", in particular official government sources.

Would you be able to confirm the source of your change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128151412
volga_shibe (2022-10-28 06:47:59+00:00): I've been there in person
rhtb0 (2022-10-28 08:24:41+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-28 08:29:23+00:00): 롯데리아가 있는 건물들의 구역은 공원 구역이 아닙니다. 이렇게 편집하시는 이유는 무엇인가요?
nevw (2022-10-28 04:18:49+00:00): Hi, you are expected to map the footprint of the building and if it looks like a house, tag with building=house, etc.
A random shape over the building is sub optimal and of no use to the map.
Mapiate (2023-01-16 18:03:06+00:00): Hi Emily1253, thank you for your contributions to OSM.

In Bing imagery, there is no building visible at this location. This location appears be used for weighing trucks. It may be more appropriate to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dweighbridge. Can you confirm if this the case?

Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128151613
rhtb0 (2022-10-28 08:24:35+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
b-jazz (2022-10-31 21:38:07+00:00): Hi Alan, thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. When you have to map around bunkers or islands within bunkers like in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107615818, you should draw them as separate entities, and not draw across and around them and back out in what I refer to as "lollipop" mapping. The inner ways should be rough/fairway/whatever and they can be combined/joined with the enclosing way to form a multipolygon. If you need help with doing this, please feel free to reach out.
mariotomo (2022-11-15 10:15:51+00:00): encuentro esta edición pues mejora la geometría de objetos que tenían que ser rectangulizados. gracias por hacerlo. sugerencia: por favor aprovecha del comentario al conjunto de cambios para describir la acción, no te limites a copiar los hashtag sugeridos. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-29 03:49:42+00:00): "Bicycle=designated" is not the same thing as "bicycle=yes"

From the documentation: "[designated] means that there is a (explicit) sign saying something like "pedestrians allowed", or a pedestrian icon." (link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ).

Please stop marking everything as bike paths when they are not explicitly marked as bike paths with a real, physical sign in the real world marking them as bike paths.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:51:23+00:00): Do not add cartpaths where it is actually a roadway.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:53:51+00:00): Also, do not add waterways as golf hazards when they are not on the golf course.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-28 10:27:05+00:00): this area is within an existing parking lot, i think the proper fix is to delete it or split it into individual parking spaces?
watmildon (2022-10-28 18:43:18+00:00): Ah, missed that as the QuickFix UI in Map roulette only shows the one area. I'll patch this one up and try to be a bit more aware. Did you catch this with tooling or just clicking through random edits?
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-28 19:25:04+00:00): thanks for fixing this, interesting to know about the maproulette UI... i was just scrolling thru osmcha for NZ looking for one of my own edits :)
watmildon (2022-10-28 20:35:03+00:00): You got it.
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/28573
watmildon (2022-10-28 21:22:35+00:00): Alright, that should look better and keep some other folks from tripping into it with that MR task. Let me know if something else is amiss. Thanks for letting me know.
Diacritic (2022-10-28 04:17:23+00:00): Hi Pkyle,

You've updated the address for Highvale Secondary College to 2 Capital Avenue, which does not appear to be correct. 2 Capital Avenue is up the road adjacent Karou Court.

According to official sources, the address of the school is 2 (or 2-20) Troy Street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128152652
pkyle (2022-10-28 04:24:23+00:00): You are very correct sir! I was going by the address listed on the school's website, but after having a look at RealEstate.com.au (https://www.realestate.com.au/property/2-troy-st-glen-waverley-vic-3150) It seems as though Highvale Secondary College need to update the address on their site! Thanks for picking that up.
Diacritic (2022-10-28 04:35:52+00:00): No problem at all. :)
Warin61 (2022-11-04 01:41:08+00:00): Hi,

The parking relations for 'London Bridge' ... 
Relation 14741147 outer ways share segments... that is an error .. and then I'd not think the parking area is named 'London Bridge' .. that is some other feature. 
Relation 14741146 duplicates 3 of 4 ways ... of the above relation .. 

What I'd do ... delete the relations. Tag the 4 ways as parking and be done. Simple is better. May want to check there are no duplications of the ways too.
tastrax (2022-11-06 23:29:15+00:00): Done....hopefully!