piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
InfosReseaux (2021-08-04 09:49:20+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces ajouts très détaillées avec les poteaux :)

Serait-ce possible d'ajouter operator=Enedis sur les lignes et les poteaux pour que nous puissions les comptabiliser sur https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr s'il vous plait ?

Des campagnes de nettoyage/complétude ont lieu par département en ce moment, nous serions heureux que le Finistère puisse nous rejoindre :)

Bonne journée
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:42:37+00:00): El nombre de este lugar es un nombre ficticio que nunca tuvo uso El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Riquimáu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada y, mucho menos, inventada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324713
habi (2023-01-20 08:28:33+00:00): Tschou zäme

Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81313386 habt ihr schon einen Eintrag erfasst.
Ich habe die beiden Einträge zusammengefasst.

Gruss,
habi
habi (2023-01-20 08:29:28+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131497781
MattMan32571 (2020-09-02 22:50:40+00:00): really don't delete the grass and so I added that on because when you go into edit you see all the grass around these areas
MattMan32571 (2020-09-02 22:51:11+00:00): i'm trying to get more  spawns for my neighborhood area
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:17:31+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA, es "El Polléu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90325047
literan (2020-09-08 11:10:53+00:00): добрый день. Не надо менять теги crossing=uncontrolled (нерегулируемый переход) на непонятно что означающий crossing=marked. Этот тег в российских реалиях смысла не имеет - у нас маркируют любые переходы. Верну обратно.
dressed-pleasekin (2020-09-08 11:28:55+00:00): Понял, принято! Спасибо, учту
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:13:33+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA, es "San Esteban/San Isteba". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90325116
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:06:59+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia oficial de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA. es "Les Cruces" Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90325140
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:02:17+00:00): Por favor, edita siguiendo las convenciones de la comunidad española de OSM. Según la toponimia oficial de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA, el nombre correcto de este lugar es Llamascura.
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:11:00+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA, es "Les Segaes". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90325213
Xuacu (2020-09-04 17:55:55+00:00): El nombre oficial de acuerdo con la Toponimia publicada en el BOPA es "Colloto/Cualloto", siendo "name:ast=Cualloto" Por favor, edita siguiendo los usos de la comunidad española de OSM para evitar perder datos y/o otras consecuencias que nadie desea.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90325357
woodpeck (2020-09-03 08:38:59+00:00): Please don't - type=boundary is totally legit for large non-administrative features. I'm changing that back.
Adam Franco (2020-09-03 12:44:21+00:00): Sorry about that, @woodpeck. The Copper Country State Forest isn't rendering in Carto and so I was aligning its tagging with the other Michigan State Forests that *do* render, like Escanaba https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1976420
In addition to removing landuse=forest, Version #2 of this relation changed from type=multipolygon to type=boundary. My hunch was that change may have broken rendering of this state forest. 

The wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary only talks about administrative boundaries, but I now see that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area does list type=boundary as allowed for protected_areas.

I guess this relation has some other problem, though validation didn't find any errors.
jeslop (2020-09-03 09:44:38+00:00): Hola Jaime. Gracias por empezar a colaborar con OSM. Te comento: la etiqueta name debe recoger el nombre administrativo del municipio, localidad o aldea. En el caso de Asturias son los recogidos aquí: https://sede.asturias.es/portal/site/Asturias/menuitem.fe57bf7c5fd38046e44f5310bb30a0a0/?vgnextoid=757d21bda2295210VgnVCM10000097030a0aRCRD
Como ves es Cangues D'Onis/Cangas de Onís, en bable/castellano, no solo en castellano. El Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) también recoge en su Nomenclátor esta denominación que es la única que se debe usar. Para cada lengua hay su etiqueta correspondiente.
Igualmente, en el caso de hórreo, no se debe usar su descripción como nombre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Caracter%C3%ADsticas_que_generan_dudas_en_España). En esa página puedes ver como se etiqueta correctamente un hórreo.
Si necesitas más ayuda aquí teienes los canales de contacto con la comunidad española: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Canales_de_contacto
user_5359 (2020-09-03 04:58:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information ("Home") from residential or owner to a residential building! A parking lot is noticed by amenity=parking.
btwhite92 (2020-09-04 04:37:40+00:00): Hello,
Why were these relations changed from 'type=boundary' to 'type=multipolygon' along with an undocumented tag 'boundary:type'? The usage of the 'boundary=protected_area' tag is well documented (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area) and used everywhere else in the US for national forest lands.
btwhite92 (2020-09-04 04:40:00+00:00): See also here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands) for the correct tagging of USFS lands. Please correct these boundaries as well as any others you may have changed.
TheConductor (2020-09-04 04:55:08+00:00): Fixed.
skyper (2020-09-03 18:53:48+00:00): How can you fix a oneway situation with only imagery as source?
gseethar (2020-09-21 10:31:54+00:00): Hello Skyper,

Apologies for the delay in response. I was on long leave.
In the above changeset, I have removed one-way for the small segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751610238#map=19/37.83953/-121.25850&layers=N) as it was causing an island  topology error. 

Let me know if you have any suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh
skyper (2020-09-21 12:43:15+00:00): Hey Ganesh

So, you were fixing which should have been noticed by the review ten month ago.

Still, I do not understand, why you did not simply cut off the small segment and add it to the "entrance" way from the west. Creating a new way was not necessary.

Why did not fix the routing island completely? As with the missing access tags on the service roads, we still have a routing island.

cu skyper
gseethar (2020-09-24 09:10:00+00:00): Hi Skyper, 

We apologize for our error and delay since this is an old edit it took time to investigate and identify the reasons for it. This instance is a sheer human error from both editor and reviewer. The editor had just newly joined our process while making this edit. We have passed on the wrong edit as a suggestion to the editor.
Coming to my edit, I was just concerned about the topology error based on directionality and fixed it with out paying much attention to vicinity. This has been fixed in this changeset:123455667.
Let me know if you have any further suggestions. Happy to work with you.
Thanks,
Ganesh
gseethar (2020-09-24 09:21:59+00:00): Apologies for the typo in Change set. The actual change set is 91421675.
user_5359 (2020-09-03 04:51:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I assume the name of this street is "Morrow Court"? I move the information of the crossing to the street.
GinaroZ (2020-11-17 00:00:15+00:00): The A697 is not a trunk road, please change it back to primary
Nathan_A_RF (2020-11-17 00:33:07+00:00): This is trunk for many reasons, most notably the signs are green along the length and the national mapping agency for GB marks it as trunk also.
Do you have evidence to say it should be primary?
GinaroZ (2020-11-17 14:44:16+00:00): The signs are not green along the entire length, e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/qq4GvZr836qOvFO18BdUAg 
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6255338
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/63O17Es0ET4OitmCGCBiLW

The first two have previously been green signs.

It is also not legally classified as a trunk road by Transport Scotland.
Nathan_A_RF (2020-11-18 01:52:00+00:00): See here for details https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=42039. Consensus thus far is non trunk, I suggest waiting a few days if more information comes through then appropriate action will be taken
GinaroZ (2020-11-27 15:18:37+00:00): I've reverted this back to primary as there's no conclusive evidence it's trunk.
Nathan_A_RF (2020-11-27 16:28:56+00:00): Fair enough, there was not enough evidence in the discussion raised. If more comes I'll bring it up in this edit again.,
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:33:26+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Non usare le immagini aeree di Bing, perché spesso non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. lanes=1 significa che c'è una sola corsia di marcia. E' più probabile che ci siano due corsie anche se non sono indicate. In questo caso si deve procedere come nell'esempio 3 o 4 a seconda del caso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Examples Ciao, Andrea
matti157 (2020-09-09 23:02:29+00:00): Fatto! La strada in realtà è larga quanto un Fiat Ducato, comunque l'esempio più somigliante è il 4, ho messo 2 corsie e lane_markings=no

Grazie!
Mattia
iandees (2020-09-03 01:54:19+00:00): Hello, please don't add areas just for Pokemon Go. You should only add areas if they truly exist in the real world.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90326789
MattMan32571 (2020-09-03 02:03:20+00:00): well that grass and trees and benches and pools and pond and houses and etc really do exist in the real world where my house is at so please don't remove any of the stuff because it does actually exist I would have not added it if it wasn't real and actually their in the real world
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90326789
MattMan32571 (2020-09-03 02:12:59+00:00): thank you for helping but I added the grass and benches and tress and roads and pools and pond and etc because all of it does exist in the real world near my house thank you again for helping and so and I'll be more careful in the future but please don't remove anything I added because I have literally figured out whats in my neighborhood and so by walking around and sight seeing and etc
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90326789
Thibaultmol (2020-09-04 07:15:47+00:00): If you want to map grass. fine. But don't make these silly weird shapes. Just make it a big grass field or 2. Clearly you're trying to trick the Pogo algorithm and that is NOT ALLOWED ON OPENSTREETMAP
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:44:54+00:00): Ciao. Non aggiungere i numeri civici agli edifici. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Posiziona quindi un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso ove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Grazie, Andrea
matti157 (2020-09-09 22:55:15+00:00): Rimosso il civico, avresti un link per capire cosa intendi per "nodo"? Grazie a te ovviamente

Mattia
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-10 06:44:35+00:00): Il nodo è uno dei 3 elementi del modello di dati di OpenStreetMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nodo Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:50:54+00:00): Ciao. La sintassi con cui aggiungere il numero di telefono è phone=+<country code> <area code> <local number>. Quindi in questo caso phone=+39 0125 xxxx. Inoltre addr:city deve essere uguale al nome del comune. Ciao, Andrea
matti157 (2020-09-09 23:12:45+00:00): Sistemato! Grazie, Mattia
O Fim (2021-03-21 22:16:56+00:00): Excelente trabalho , entretanto uma parte da rota em que contorna a Praça general Humberto de Souza melo esta incorreta , a linha vira na rua Jequitinhonha e segue reto para a ponte vila maria
SJoao (2021-03-21 23:11:09+00:00): Obrigado! lembro deste trecho ter me confundido um pouco, vou marcar para revisão, qualquer sugestão é bem vinda
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:55:03+00:00): Ciao, quello che in Italia viene chiamato bar dovrebbe essere inserito con amenity=cafe. amenity=bar è un locale dove si servono solo alcolici, in genere non si può mangiare, c'è musica ad alto volume e spesso si deve stare in piedi. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dbar Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:42:01+00:00): Ciao, i landuse non devono essere attaccati alle strade. Ciao, Andrea
matti157 (2020-09-09 23:09:46+00:00): Rimosso, grazie! Mattia
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-03 08:37:51+00:00): Ciao. Dai tag che hai aggiunto e dalle foto satellitari, questa strada sembrerebbe di più una highway=track, ovvero una strada a prevalente uso agricolo, che una highway=unclassified: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack Inoltre surface=dirt è spesso confuso con surface=compacted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface Ciao, Andrea
matti157 (2020-09-09 23:07:58+00:00): Ciao,
si confermo che è una highway=track. Invece ho guardato le foto dell'esempio e il più somigliante alle condizioni attuali è surface=dirt, è consigliato cambiarlo in compacted?

Grazie!
Mattia
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-10 06:51:08+00:00): Ciao. No, è da cambiare solo se le caratteristiche non corrispondono. Comunque non basarti solo sulle foto ma anche sulla descrizione. Ciao, Andrea
lcmortensen (2020-09-03 03:49:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset 90331514 - the motorway designation begins at the ramp junction, not at the sign. The begins/ends sign is often placed beyond the junction to reduce clutter.
dgitto (2020-09-03 04:28:28+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2020-09-03 04:31:48+00:00): il tag "name" va usato solo quando un oggetto ha un nome proprio. "piccola struttura di servizio" è una descrizione.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi
SomeoneElse (2021-07-17 10:43:08+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843720729 here, but it overlaps almost completely with another building.  If your version is correct, you can delete the other one.
Best Regards,
Andy
mbethke (2020-09-03 03:33:57+00:00): Hi,
I suppose things like psychiatry are not exactly a specialty of the government veterinary? I changed it to amenity=veterinary; healthcare=* is for humans.

cheers,
Matthias
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:16:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:16:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:18:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
Frans S (2020-10-06 13:59:15+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-06 14:19:02+00:00): Here is the internet page on which you can see your mappings and the corrections made to them
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92055252
Best regards
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-12-02 03:05:07+00:00): Hi, dur_ga

You did a great job. But due to overlapping issue, I have to delete the highway data (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/843731935) and choose to use the data you last added (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/844282604). Please let me know if you have any other suggestions for this.
Thank you, happy mapping!
MattMan32571 (2020-09-03 03:02:14+00:00): thank you for the help and sorry if I was very rude to you I wasn't trying to I was just trying to get my point and so across so thank you again for the help I'm new to using OSM so I appreciate the help
Frans S (2020-09-03 12:40:32+00:00): Hello.
A request. 
Will you please stop mapping like this  and focus on the goals of this project?
Please read the instructions  on TM4 and this document 
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

ere are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
I remove all your mappings here. They are not of any added value.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-09-03 04:48:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
jleedev (2020-09-04 21:18:25+00:00): Millers Road is 55mph and divided for a good 4.5 miles here. Never mind the questionable mass edit in the first place, why should this not be trunk?
Fluffy89502 (2020-09-04 21:24:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#International_equivalence
iandees (2020-09-04 21:34:28+00:00): Fluffy89502, please stop making large scale changes without feedback from the community. The wiki is a set of guidelines and is not necessarily agreed-upon. If you feel strongly about these changes, please post to talk-us and the OSM US Slack before continuing.
BCNorwich (2020-09-03 07:16:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The OSM tag internet_access is not meant for public access sites not those places limited to student access, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access

Thus I've removed those tags and added a note to describe WLAN access. I removed the boundary as it's not relevant. I placed the POI data on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 12:34:53+00:00): Hello Ta là siêu nhân,
Please don't make political edits like this. The way that OpenStreetMap handles political disputes is described at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . If you believe that the current mapping is incorrect please contact OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 12:35:11+00:00): Xin chào Ta là siêu nhân,
Vui lòng không thực hiện các chỉnh sửa chính trị như thế này. Cách OpenStreetMap xử lý các tranh chấp chính trị được mô tả tại https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Nếu bạn cho rằng ánh xạ hiện tại không chính xác, vui lòng liên hệ với Nhóm công tác dữ liệu của OSM tại data@osmfoundation.org.
Trân trọng,
Andy Townsend, đại diện cho Nhóm công tác dữ liệu của OSM.
Frans S (2020-09-03 12:27:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Just try to map all objects on the spot you are mapping. Now, another mapper has to finish it.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90330649
NyanSten (2020-09-03 04:38:32+00:00): You have reverted much more than just where the motorway starts
Frans S (2020-09-03 10:30:22+00:00): Hello.  I've send you a PM about your mappings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90331569
AndersAndersson (2020-09-03 07:51:36+00:00): Hej!

Jag såg att denna stig hade en bredd på 0 meter. Det kändes lite smalt. :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843753554

Bra jobbat med området kring Styrsjön!
Frans S (2020-09-03 08:46:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
Just pay attention on details.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90332861
stevefoto (2020-09-06 19:29:15+00:00): Hi Adrianna.

you are tracing with very high quality, but also regularly breaking relations e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7476085 .
Are you part of some kind of project?

Best wishes
Frans S (2020-09-03 07:59:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mapping are not that accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them
I invalidated this task 833 so you can improve your buildings

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90333527
Frans S (2020-09-03 07:49:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
Just a small remark. 1 of the buildings shows an entrance with (I think ) a car parked in front of it. Just map the part of the building that is erected.  not the parking spaces
Try to follow the outlines of the building as precise as possible. This seems to me a wealthy nabourhood, houses with complex corners and extentions. Zoom in as far as possible (10 mtr or more) and draw the building
You marked this task as complete mapped. 
Sorry, but many buildings still needs to be mapped.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90333534
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:19:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!