piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Asteliks (2022-01-03 09:33:20+00:00): Cześć, chciałbym Ci podziękować że dodałeś te drzwi nieco mi to ułatwiło życie. Gdyby tak więcej osób dodawało drzwi. Wgl byłoby genialnie gdyby ludzie dodawali dostępne numery mieszkań za drzwiami: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats
kocio (2022-01-03 10:01:32+00:00): Super, a z ciekawości - w czym ci to pomogło?
Asteliks (2022-01-03 12:09:33+00:00): ułatwiło mi to spotkanie się ze znajomymi bo nie wiedziałem że tam są drzwi. Pierwotnie kręciłem się od drugiej strony budynku
user_5359 (2016-02-21 17:23:05+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast vergessen an den beiden Weg entsprechende Beschreibungen einzutragen (Sollen dass Zäune sein (barrier=fence)?).
SomeoneElse (2016-02-28 14:41:51+00:00): Is the name of the building _really_ "Global-ID 9t96-xf6g"?  I guess it's possible, but it seems pretty unlikely...
Nakaner (2016-02-28 16:55:45+00:00): What's the source of it? / Was ist die Quelle dieser "globalen ID"?
literan (2016-02-19 12:54:13+00:00): Не надо ставить bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes и пр. на дороги. Эти теги обозначают административный запрет (т.е. по знакам, по ПДД). У нас и так по всем дорогам (кроме автомагистралей и дорог для автомобилей) разрещено ходить пешком и ездить на велике и лошадях, по ПДД. А по всем тротуарам - запрещено на велике (тоже по ПДД). Ставьте только bicycle=no если есть соотв. знак. Теги типа bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes считаются мусорными и вычищаются, так что нет смысла тратить время.
maraf24 (2016-02-19 10:27:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2226357346/history
Gdzie się podział kod pocztowy i source:addr?
Dlaczego nie przenosisz adresów przy użyciu funkcji Scalania?
trigpoint (2016-02-18 18:01:14+00:00): Hi, in what way was this feature incorrect?The mapping appears to match bing imagery.

Cheers Phil
nickmcg (2016-02-19 06:17:15+00:00): The "farm yard" as shown is, in fact, 2 domestic residences, the garden of one, and the remains of the farmyard itself (a barn and stable block). I will be adding details.
trigpoint (2016-02-19 16:21:35+00:00): Thank you, although the preferred way to deal with this type of issue is to correct what is there rather than to delete and start again. This way the history of the feature is preserved.
Maybe the farmyard tag could have been changed to landuse=residential in this case?
nickmcg (2016-02-19 16:58:38+00:00): Ok, sorry about that - there are other problems in that area as to the common land boundary which bisects to old yard. If you are able to roll back my change, I will endeavour to make the changes in your preferred manner.
trigpoint (2016-02-19 17:57:15+00:00): I have reverted back to the original, give me a shout if you need any help.
Cheers Phil
nickmcg (2016-02-19 21:29:23+00:00): Thanks Phil, will do.
maraf24 (2016-02-19 10:32:34+00:00): Do tego ronda dochodzą drogi jednojezdniowe, a nie tak jak zrobiłeś - dwujezdniowe.
Przy okazji: niewłaściwa treść komentarza do zestawu zmian.
user_5359 (2016-02-21 17:15:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wegen der Touristeninformation bitte mal auf der Einstiegsseite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a nach dem Begriff suchen, um den Eintrag zu verbessern.
5m4u9 (2016-02-19 05:23:53+00:00): gracias por las ediciones, me agrada que cada uno vaya añadiendo sus lugares que conoce.

No es necesario añadir el tipo de negocio en el nombre, hay duplicidad en aplicaciones y programas (OSmand, maps.me, scout)
Fischkopp0815 (2016-02-18 17:26:45+00:00): Ich habe shop=car in shop=car_rental geändert. Ich denke das passt besser
Fischkopp0815 (2016-02-18 17:37:07+00:00): Ich meinte natürlich amenity=car_rental
SomeoneElse (2016-03-07 12:25:44+00:00): I've deleted the wikipedia link to "null island" from Pirata station 13010.  Please don't add garbage links to OpenStreetMap.
5m4u9 (2016-02-19 06:03:04+00:00): se añade lugares único y no conjuntos por comodidad, sino se tiene el dato no añadir.
JJIglesias (2016-02-19 06:14:25+00:00): Considerando q ya los Mapas OSM estan siendo bajados a Diario a GPS Garmin, con poner q hay varias librerias funcionario, Digo yo...
5m4u9 (2016-02-19 06:29:05+00:00): claro, entiendo. pero no todos usan un garmin. quizá por lo pequeño no se llegue a notar... 

pero en dispositivos más grandes, aplicaciones geográficas y otros usos llega a ser un error más que un beneficio. cada uno tiene un horario de atención, email, página, etc...

En resumen, a visitar, tomar foto de la fachada y registrar cada uno por separado.
literan (2016-02-19 12:38:16+00:00): А в чем ошибка-то была? Отсутствие чего-то в базе (на карте) это не ошибка :-)
DmitryiS (2016-02-19 16:39:10+00:00): Грамматическая ошибка в слове "Нефтьмагистраль" в названии заправки у "КЭМПа".  
Дальше забыл исправить заголовок в программе Go Map при добавлении отсутствующих данных. :-)
Только разбираюсь с программой на iPad 4, IOS 7.1.2. 
Программа часто падает, поэтому приходится часто отправлять изменения.
DmitryiS (2016-02-19 16:40:01+00:00): Ошибку, кстати, так и не исправили. )))
literan (2016-02-20 07:58:36+00:00): Если скажете поточнее, где это - прям сейчас исправлю :)
trigpoint (2016-02-18 17:57:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think something has gone wrong here, you appear to have added a way to the map that has no tags, and does not appear to match anything on the ground.
What were you intending?
Please remember this is a live map that is used by many people. 
Do you need any help cleaning this up?
Cheers Phil
jasonrwalters (2016-02-18 18:38:22+00:00): Hello!  Sorry I was trying to edit and grab London to South East England for a project.  We can delete?
trigpoint (2016-02-19 16:15:44+00:00): Thanks, I have reverted it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37294846
user_5359 (2016-02-18 20:07:42+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte lese zur Kennzeichnung von Hotel oder Pension die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a durch. Kurzfassung: Durch den Namen geht es nicht.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37317060 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 37303775, 37303742, 37293260, 37292684, 37292170 by user fufzich due to deletion instead of correct tagging and similar violations of common rules. See discussion of changeset 37303742 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37317063 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 37303775, 37303742, 37293260, 37292684, 37292170 by user fufzich due to deletion instead of correct tagging and similar violations of common rules. See discussion of changeset 37303742 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37317060 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 37303775, 37303742, 37293260, 37292684, 37292170 by user fufzich due to deletion instead of correct tagging and similar violations of common rules. See discussion of changeset 37303742 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37317063 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 37303775, 37303742, 37293260, 37292684, 37292170 by user fufzich due to deletion instead of correct tagging and similar violations of common rules. See discussion of changeset 37303742 for details.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-24 23:00:49+00:00): Are you sure there are really three bus stops so close together at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4013090738 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4013090739 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390222096 ?  I can see that there were three notes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/401081 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/401082 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/401084 , but are you sure that it isn't three notes for one bus stop?
Also, it'd be really helpful if you could try and avoid "worldwide edits" like this - a change like this will appear in everyone's history list, making it difficult to see what's been edited where.
user_5359 (2016-02-18 20:04:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die Spezialrichtungen der Ärzte sollten nicht in den Namen aufgenommen werden, bitte lesen hier mal die Hilfeseite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Arzt
luiswoo (2016-02-19 13:17:14+00:00): привет, макака.
luiswoo (2016-02-19 21:12:25+00:00): Макака, можешь себя поздравить: Автономна Республіка Крим удалена. У тебя появилась возможность потренироваться в её восстановлении. Если будет тяжко, можешь поплакаться на форуме osm:uk http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
skyper (2021-04-29 18:47:36+00:00): Hallo Winfried
Woher hast Du die Information, dass der FR2 komplett Fahrradstraße sein soll? Von Maps4BW wohl eher nicht, oder? Habe mal `bicycle_road` von den `path` entfernt.
Auch finde ich im CS keine einzige Fläche mit `landuse`. Wie kommst Du zu Deinem CS-Kommentar?

Grüße skyper
q_un_go (2021-05-01 16:11:05+00:00): Ist schon eine Weile her...
Die Hagelstauden zwischen Alice-Salomon-Straße und Basler Landstraße sind nun Fahrradstraße, wie ich kürzlich beim Durchfahren gesehen habe. Muss ich aber noch mal nachprüfen.
skyper (2021-05-02 15:09:34+00:00): Ja, dieser Teil ist Fahrradstraße, mir geht es um alles nördlich der Brücke über die B3/B31. Da waren lauter merkwürdige Sachen wie die Routenbezeichnung im Namen und `bicycle_road` ist glaube ich kompromisslos für jeden Teil verwendet worden.

Kannst Du bitte etwas detailliertere CS_Kommentare und Quellenangaben verwenden, dann würde es mir auch leichter fallen manche Änderungen nachzuvollziehen.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
luiswoo (2016-02-18 20:36:08+00:00): Гы, какой смысл от эти листочков, Тацинский там не взят.
-off- (2016-02-18 20:39:48+00:00): Не понял. Ты имеешь ввиду Pirate Pad? Я Тацинский сделал до того как отписался на форуме.
luiswoo (2016-02-18 21:22:03+00:00): Ок.
Накатал легенду на форуме, по идее, должно хватить и на черновую сборку и доводку.
luiswoo (2016-02-18 22:28:05+00:00): ps. Валидотор обновляется через пень-колоду, лучше будет добавить уже обработанные районы, хотя бы последние.
trigpoint (2016-02-18 18:49:54+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37294846
trigpoint (2016-02-18 18:50:02+00:00): Thanks
SammysHP (2016-02-22 16:42:42+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset hast du viele Garagen oder andere kleine Gebäude gelöscht. Ich bitte dich, diese wiederherzustellen.
marc__marc (2021-02-10 10:05:00+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux-dire sloped_curb=at_grade ? c'est la même chose que flush sans une bordure totalement aplatie qu'on ne sent pas en marchant dessus ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Matthieu 37 (2021-02-10 17:43:28+00:00): Bonjour, 
A vrai dire, je ne me rappelle plus de la modification apportée (quel passage piétons avec cette propriété ?). Le but était probablement d'indiquer la possibilité de franchir le passage en fauteuil roulant (pas de "marche" et passage à niveau). Mais visiblement, ce n'est pas ainsi qu'il faut le spécifier. 
Cordialement, 
Matthieu
marc__marc (2021-02-10 17:50:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4013278931
sloped_curb était utilisé jadis (et remplacé par kerb), mais je n'avais rien trouvé à propos de la valeur at_grade sur le wiki.
s'il n'y a pas de marche et que c'est plat, c'est sans doute kerb=flsuh qui convient.
Matthieu 37 (2021-02-10 18:02:35+00:00): C'est corrigé :) L'éditeur en ligne signale l'attribut obsolète et réalise la modification d'un simple clic.
GerdP (2016-02-22 08:19:57+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped four roads for busses with highway=*. I've changed those to highway=service. I guess you found this in the wiki, please note that highway=* always is a placeholder, means, you should use primary,secondary etc. instead of the * .
My changeset is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37361180
user_5359 (2016-02-18 19:38:02+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset.  Please read the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
user_5359 (2016-02-18 20:41:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have forgot to add any information to your point.
paulbiv (2016-02-18 22:45:05+00:00): Why is Chapel Lane Unclassified? It's closed at both ends (gate at Forge Lane end, bollards at the Hempstead end and functions as a bridleway. Not open to through traffic except pedestrian, bicycle and horse.
sdoerr (2016-02-18 23:06:24+00:00): Chapel Lane, Bredhurst is listed as a publicly maintainable highway in the Kent streets gazetteer. In earlier versions (I have a version from 5 Mar 2013 saved), it has two road numbers, U1878 and U1879, where the U prefix indicates (I believe) an unclassified road.
paulbiv (2016-02-18 23:33:17+00:00): Think the Bredhurst one may be http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37282705 which on the out of copyright 1:25000 OS is the continuation of Chapel Lane. The changeset one does not enter Bredhurst parish. It's definitely not a through road, with notices at the Forge Lane end
MatSmith (2016-02-22 20:22:52+00:00): I have restored the status of Chaple Lane to a footway, with the attributes:
Not open to through traffic except pedestrian, bicycle and horse.
I hope it's now back as it should be.
Thanks for pointing out my error.
paulbiv (2016-02-22 22:06:31+00:00): Thanks. Unfortunately I hadn't mapillary'd it. I've got the forge lane entrance but not the rest. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/JJYQuKwPX4LD8E7bEktnGQ/photo. Armchair mappers welcome to use the mapillary pics.
Maartends (2016-04-01 10:13:11+00:00): Hej,

Way: 398595276: traced a lake that was already previously traced.
archie (2016-04-01 10:48:01+00:00): Oh, I am sorry. Would you mind deleting my tracing. Thanks!
Maartends (2016-04-01 16:21:23+00:00): Deleted my own. Closing.
user_5359 (2016-02-21 17:11:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Es tut mir leid, aber bei dem Accountname kann ich mich nur melden. Kleiner Hinweis: der Eintrag oneway=no ist nicht nötig, weil er die Standardausprägung ist. Falls Fragen offen sind: Meldet Euch ruhig (per Mail), ich werde versuchen die Fragen zu beantworten.  

Mit freundlichen Grüßen        Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
5m4u9 (2016-02-19 02:57:42+00:00): gracias por editar y corregir el número.
5m4u9 (2016-02-19 03:11:24+00:00): cambié el número al lugar donde más o menos suele estar la puerta, es muy útil llevarlo así
Kris Anselmo (2016-02-19 10:03:42+00:00): Merci pour le revert!
Sanniu (2017-01-26 14:29:58+00:00): Way: 398602061 have no type, is it park?
fkv (2019-09-14 19:45:11+00:00): Why did you add a bus stop to a katastralgemeinden boundary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390666693/history) ?
emergency99 (2019-09-14 20:16:28+00:00): That one should just be added to the street. Seems to also be part of the border by mistake. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will fix it as soon as possible. But I must say: The border ways that wildly intersect, lie under streets and all of that often need extreme caition when moving any node so it does not clip to the border to. I think there are a few shared points that are shared between borders and streets.

Question: Does it matter? If the point is also part of a street?
fkv (2019-09-14 20:39:29+00:00): Blöderweise verlaufen die Katastralgemeindegrenzen fast nie entlang der Straßenmitte. Am einfachsten ist es, den Node aus der Grenze wieder rauszunehmen, aber noch besser schaust du dir die Grenze am wien.at Stadtplan an. (Wie man sich zu den Katastralgemeindegrenzen durchklickt, weiß ich nicht mehr auswendig.)
Klumbumbus (2016-11-21 20:54:42+00:00): Hallo,
bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228338274 ist dir bewusst, dass das Geoportal Sachsen nicht als Quelle für OSM zugelassen ist?
VG
R_A (2016-03-01 15:37:43+00:00): Worin liegt der "minor fix" ein Linie zu löschen und dabei zwei Relationen zu zerstören?
wohnung058 (2016-03-03 07:47:13+00:00): Oh, da ist dann wohl was schief gelaufen. Wenn dem so ist, bitte reverten. Kann es momentan leider nicht selbst machen. Danke für den Hinweis. Fehler passieren manchmal ;-(
literan (2016-02-23 12:21:40+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=37387340 гляньте комментарий. Вы, видимо, случайно улицу в угол превратили, я поправил
mogura (2016-02-23 16:13:58+00:00): Спасибо друг! Недоглядел.
mogura (2016-02-23 16:14:53+00:00): Сейчас как надо!
user_5359 (2016-02-19 05:25:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you really want this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398624678 ??
mgpx (2016-02-20 22:56:45+00:00): Ez a changeset csomó címkézetlen vonalat vitt fel. Mit ennek az oka, mit akarnak a vonalak jelölni?
zsero (2016-02-20 23:15:45+00:00): A cimzetlen vonalak véletlen vannak, Strava editorban a save-re kattintva véletlen elküldtem a changesetet, és semmilyen módot nem találtam arra, hogy korrigáljam.
mgpx (2016-02-20 23:01:37+00:00): Ez a changeset számos erdei utat footway címkével jelölt. A footway-el utcai cipőben járható városi sétautakat jelölünk, erdei környezetben path-t ill. track-et használunk (előbbit gyalogosan járható ösvényekre, utóbbit erdészeti járművekkel járható két keréknyom széles utakra)
zsero (2016-02-20 23:22:02+00:00): Köszönöm, az iD-ben a "Foot Path" és a "Path" sosem volt így elmagyarázva, most már tudom hogy path-t kellett volna használni.
user_5359 (2016-02-19 05:08:47+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense.
user_5359 (2016-02-19 05:09:13+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense.
user_5359 (2016-02-19 13:57:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Closed and the building destroyed?? Or only closed?
pkoby (2016-04-13 01:37:08+00:00): The building's definitely still there (and still says Gamble Mill, but I found news articles that verify its closure). Reverted in changeset 38514129.
Durko_freemap (2016-02-22 08:11:52+00:00): Zdravim ivucho, ak ste miestny z Plavych Vozokan, vedeli by ste umiestnit na cestu(1559 a 1576) dopravnu znacku zaciatok a koniec obce (traffic_sign=city_limit)? teraz sa cez obec moze jazdit 90tkou, lebo z dostupnych udajov nevieme kde su tieto znacky, nasledne by som upravil rychlostne limity v obci. Vdaka. Durko
ivucho (2016-02-24 13:22:40+00:00): zdravím Durko,
som tu nový, takže rád umiestnim na dané cesty značku začiatok aj koniec obce ale neviem ako. Nemám to ešte tak zmáknuté čo všetko sa tu dá robiť a upravovať. A som miestny z Plavých Vozokán, čo som vedel to som upravil. Ak by ste mi poradili ako osadiť dopravné značenie, rád to upravím aby to bolo korektné a sedelo to.
S pozdravom
Ivan
Durko_freemap (2016-02-24 14:01:59+00:00): Zdravim Ivan, v zasade ide len o to, ze na prislusnej ceste vytvorite bod(napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/662840708#map=19/48.28548/18.55274) a tomu bodu date tag traffic_sign=city_limit + name=Plavé Vozokany, vytvori sa taky zlty stvorcek. Na mape to sice nieje vidiet, ale ked viete kde je znacka (http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/wg6Tmh2k3cm0Qx2-nc9n4A/photo) nasledne vieme do mapy zaznacit zmenu rychlosti na 50tku. Vytvorenie bodu je rovnake ako ked ste vytvoril tuto skolu http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4013899513. Durko
ivucho (2016-02-26 17:09:00+00:00): Dobrý deň prajem,
ďakujem za vysvetlenie a už som to podľa inštrukcií upravil. Dúfam, že to bude v poriadku.
Prajem príjemný deň a veľa aktualizovaných máp.
S pozdravom Ivan.
keithonearth (2016-02-19 06:17:17+00:00): Well, I have no idea why, but after my meaningless edit, and refreshing my browser, the buildings all showed up. Most odd. I hope I didn't make a mistake when I first added them...
zxh_1988 (2016-02-19 06:25:17+00:00): 谢谢修改。
SammysHP (2016-02-22 16:42:14+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset hast du viele Garagen oder andere kleine Gebäude gelöscht. Ich bitte dich, diese wiederherzustellen.
aharvey (2017-01-07 10:01:21+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398656117 the signage on the ground indicates the southern extent of the NP extends further. Do you think it's okay to update it to match the on the ground data? Also I suspect the boundary for the rest is simply mean high water mark, so can it be joined to the existing admin boundaries and and the coastline to match mean high water mark?
Warin61 (2017-01-07 21:10:01+00:00): Hi,
No problem extending to the south for ground truth. Possibly the LPI data is out of date here?
On the waterline... looks like the LPI boundary is the low water mark ... I'd leave that alone unless you have some evidence otherwise? It would make some sense for the low water mark boundary as a protection issue with casually walkers at the low water times - avoids jurisdiction issues? I don't know... but the LPI data indicates towards a low water boundary.
TheSwavu (2017-01-08 02:32:16+00:00): I put the suburb boundary in before we had access to the LPI data and I was using best guess as to what the ABS boundaries were on the ground, hence using the coastline.

Interestingly the NPWS boundary isn't consistent with the cadastre around the coastline, which is a bit odd because the property boundaries would define what was gazetted as the park boundary. But it does line up exactly with the suburb and LGA boundaries.

As to the southern boundary it is currently correctly aligned with the cadastre so unless you happen to have found the survey pegs I'd say that's the best available information.

Coastline boundaries on the other hand are so vague (LPI has two different interpretations available) I'd be happy to snap it to the coastline. Trying to figure out if it's supposed to be mean high or low water would require going back and trying to find the original designation of the lighthouse reserve.
Warin61 (2017-01-08 04:19:33+00:00): Looking at the 'water boundary' you can compare the LPI Base Map to the LPI or bing Imagery and see that the water level is above where this boundary lies... so I would assume that this boundary is low water mark. I think 'coastline' is taken at high water mark? 

Looking at the NSW NP website for the boundary (as confirmation only .. not for copying) http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/Kuringgai-Chase-National-Park/map/ the southern boundary looks correct. However if there are NP signs on the ground by the NPWS that claim the southern boundary is further south then I'd tend to go with that ... my experience says that their signs are conservative in area .. probably to avoid problems and costs with surveys.
aharvey (2017-01-08 04:49:38+00:00): >As to the southern boundary it is currently correctly aligned with the cadastre so unless you happen to have found the survey pegs I'd say that's the best available information.

There is a NPWS sign 70m from the currently mapped boundary. I suspect they just put the sign up outside the NP. I don't have a strong opinion either way of what to do. Whether to go by on the ground or use the cadastre.

>Coastline boundaries on the other hand are so vague (LPI has two different interpretations available) I'd be happy to snap it to the coastline. Trying to figure out if it's supposed to be mean high or low water would require going back and trying to find the original designation of the lighthouse reserve.

I thought all the different GIS datasets are just someone tracing from another plan/imagery, with the legal definition not where the GIS line was drawn but the coastline. If so, it makes sense to snap them all together, the LGA boundary, suburb boundary, coastline, NP boundary, etc.
Warin61 (2017-01-08 06:18:37+00:00): The LPI is where surveyors go to get the legal boundaries! LPI base map has those boundaries... look at your own property to see it. I know it is good for me and at least some of my relatives (where I have checked). 

Snapping things together is ok .. if they deserve to go together! I have had to remove some things that were snapped together to better define some items, mainly water courses. And choosing which of the ways is best is a choice that should be made with good data. The LPI Base Map is very usefull in those regards.