piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nicolas17 (2016-04-03 18:35:14+00:00): I have reverted changeset 38241719, which had broken several things, most importantly turned the river into a straight line. However, I got a conflict with this changeset due to the boundary changes. Please check again if there is something that needs to be fixed with relation 2431954.
FvGordon (2016-04-03 21:43:53+00:00): Thanks for your info. Relation 2411762 had been reverted at two bridges, which I could fix quickly.
m902 (2016-04-03 22:20:21+00:00): Congratulations on your first contribution to OSM. Unfortunately all you've done is to draw a line over some existing roads and paths and given it a name, which doesn't add anything to the map. Perhaps you saved it by mistake? In any case I recommend deleting it and starting again. Let me know if you need help.
misslucifer (2016-04-05 07:16:00+00:00): Yes, thanks, I have deleted it and added a new footpath.
Hjart (2016-04-03 10:27:45+00:00): Keeping highway=* and landuse separate is usually a very good idea
ff5722 (2016-04-03 11:28:35+00:00): thanks, you fixed it already as far as I can see
Hjart (2016-04-03 11:34:43+00:00): Hah, yeah. I spotted a bunch of stuff needing updates :-)
Paul_012 (2016-10-23 12:57:10+00:00): I've reverted this changeset. The 7-Eleven brand in Thailand is operated by CP All Co., Ltd. (Individual stores may be operated by franchisees, so I have left the operator field blank.)
SomeoneElse (2016-04-04 13:50:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
In here you've added what appears to be a "local walk" or similar http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/frQ .
Generally speaking, things that aren't signposted on the ground don't get added to OSM - but there are OSM-based services, such as http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ , that you can use to create with and share them.  If this _is_ signed on the ground as a local walk around Bedale, then the best way to represent it in OSM is to add it as a "local walking route relation" - see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3878675 just south of Leyburn for one a bit like that.  Relations appear on specific hiking maps such as this one:
http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!54.2711!-1.6399
Hope you don't mind - just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to ask - Andy.
chillly (2016-04-04 18:02:59+00:00): This looks like a mechanical edit. Where was this discussed?
Ropino (2016-04-04 19:13:53+00:00): Hello,
for me was the basis:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
"If the speed limit should be specified in a different unit the unit can be added to the end of the value, separated by a space"
or
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units#Common_mistakes
+ in JOSM-validator: "unusual maxspeed format"
chillly (2016-04-04 19:20:05+00:00): You can't just mass edit based on what the wiki says!! The wiki gets changed at anyone's whim. You **MUST** discuss mass edits before you make them with the relevent community (in this case the GB community) and you **MUST** get theor agreement.  

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Your edits may make sense, but you should expect that they are reverted until they have been agreed. Please do not make any more mass edits until they are agreed.
chillly (2016-04-04 20:48:27+00:00): We have discussed your mechanical edits on the GB IRC channel. We are unhappy that you feel you can ignore the guidelines and ignore the community and just make your edits as you want. You would do much better to stop showing how smart you are with your keyboard and get outside and survey some *useful* local things near you. You might enjoy the fresh air, and it might help you understand that OSM is not a computer science project, but it is a collaborative community. Join the community or at least respect it.
GerdP (2017-08-30 09:16:46+00:00): Moin!
Für nicht mehr vorhandene Wege gibt es ein eigenes Tagging-System, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Die beiden Wege sind Teile von Relationen. Kennst Du deren neuen Verlauf?
Suidakra (2017-09-22 12:25:39+00:00): Sorry hatte nix passenderes gefunden.
Den neuen Verlauf kenne ich nicht. Es ist bis jetzt auch noch so ausgeschildert. Auf meinen Hinweis wurde nicht reagiert.
GerdP (2017-09-22 14:11:30+00:00): Vielleicht ist es dann besser, erstmal nur trail_visibility=no zu setzen?
GerdP (2017-09-23 06:05:06+00:00): Ich sehe gerade, Du hast einen Weg geändert, den anderen noch nicht
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407468277
Nach Deiner Beschreibung würde ich beides eher auf highway=path + trail_visibility=no setzen. Wanderer können ja wahrscheinlich noch durch, oder?
Suidakra (2017-09-24 06:32:37+00:00): Wandere können da nur durch wenn sie bereit sind eine ca 12m hohen Schotterabhang hinaufzu klettern.
Der restliche Weg ist noch da. Nur das kleine Stück ist weg.
GerdP (2017-09-24 06:40:49+00:00): Sofern das erlabut ist, kannst Du es ja mit sac_scale erfassen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Asac_scale
ma-rt-in (2016-04-04 20:45:35+00:00): haud? Habs geändert.
bigbug21 (2026-05-24 07:06:15+00:00): Zumindest ein Teil der vor zehn Jahren angelegten Stromleitung scheint inzwischen nicht mehr zu exisierten, zumindest nicht als oberirdische Leitung. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5307147
*Martin* (2016-04-08 21:22:49+00:00): Ahoj. Kruhovy objazd sa spravne znaci takto: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:junction%3Droundabout.
mavl (2018-11-01 17:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
Hernan (2016-04-03 23:43:33+00:00): En OSM arroyo es el curso de agua que un persona normal, puede saltar por sus medios. Este curso de agua, a pesar de llamarse arroyo, se lo considera un rio, porque tiene mas de 10 metros de ancho
Math1985 (2016-06-29 13:49:24+00:00): Bedankt voor de correctie hiervan! De situatie is een beetje vaag bebord, maar het klopt inderdaad wat je gedaan hebt.
alphensebezorger (2017-08-31 21:38:02+00:00): De routerelatie heeft o.a. de tags
route=hiking
network=lcn.
lcn is de afkorting van "local cycling network", dus dat zal wel een vergissinkje zijn. Is het een fiets- of een wandelroute? Of allebei?
emvee (2017-08-31 22:11:45+00:00): Goed gespot, dat is inderdaad een vergissing, het is (alleen) een wandelroute.

Opgelost, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51629343

Bedankt!
Adam_Piszczek (2016-04-05 17:00:53+00:00): gdzie tam masz grass?jak do mostku jest ground,a od mostku do drogi polnej też ground
VA00 (2016-04-05 17:40:46+00:00): W zasadzie to wypadałoby podzielić na pół. Od mostu faktycznie jest ground/earth: https://goo.gl/maps/HHVyBdx6Huq

ale od ul. Przy Moście to ja widzę trawnik:

https://goo.gl/maps/wJaPswDgpen 

Chyba, że uznajemy to za ścieżkę ziemną o szerokości 5 cm, a i to kawałkami.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-04-05 19:36:49+00:00): A ja widzę ground i jeszcze dodam że często
tamtędy jeżdżę trekkingiem i nie ma tam grass, teraz ostatnio też tam byłem jest ground z połączeniem drobnego żwiru zaraz przy asfalcie a potem to sam ground.Mi się wydaje że te dokładności 5 cm tam są nie istotne .
malenki (2016-04-07 19:03:04+00:00): Jetzt steht an dem Parkplatz für die Badewelt 
source:name=survey, aber den namen hast du gelöscht…:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156515494/history
malenki (2016-04-09 15:54:17+00:00): Du du Edits hast, die neuer sind als mein Kommentar zu diesem Änderungssatz, habe ich den Parkplatz entsprechend editiert.
mapper999 (2016-04-09 16:13:42+00:00): Da war ich wohl etwas voreilig. Das scheint die Adresse der Badewelt zu sein. Ob deshalb tatsächlich die Parkplatzstraße diesen Namen trägt, wissen wohl die Leute vor Ort besser, wobei ich mich nicht erinnern kann, hier ein Straßenschild gesehen zu haben.
Vielen Dank fürs Korrigieren.
whb (2016-04-09 19:56:08+00:00): Dort steht wirklich ein Straßenschild, hier ganz links am Laternenmast:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/5JJF3VZWN-GNXP0VGwudFg/photo
https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/5JJF3VZWN-GNXP0VGwudFg/thumb-2048.jpg
mapper999 (2016-04-09 20:26:55+00:00): Oh danke. Das habe ich wohl tatsächlich übersehen. Nochmal danke fürs aufpassen und korrigieren!
malenki (2016-04-10 04:52:05+00:00): @whb: Ich kann da beim besten Willen kein Schild sehen – obwohl ich eine Brille aufhabe. :)
@mapper999: man gibt sich halt Mühe; gern geschehen. (:
whb (2016-04-11 22:08:14+00:00): @malenki: Hier ein Ausschnitt des Bildes, das Schild habe ich rot markiert. :)
https://s16.postimg.org/igxugfisj/Badewelt.png
Photos from Mapillary, CC BY-SA, by changchun1.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/5JJF3VZWN-GNXP0VGwudFg/photo
malenki (2016-04-12 03:26:22+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Service, jetzt sehe ich es auch.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-04-04 09:11:23+00:00): Ciao Loethar e benvenuto su OSM.
    Mettere il nome della specie dell'albero nel nome è errato. 

Devi usare genus o species come descritto qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

Ciao,

Andrea
Hernan (2016-04-03 23:14:03+00:00): El nodo de altura no va sobre el way de la calle y no se marca domicilios particulares, solo Puntos de interes. Una represa no se marca con un way que representa un arroyo
Hjart (2016-04-03 14:13:25+00:00): Jeg reverterer lige denne her eftersom Geodatastyrelsens billeder viser havnen anderledes. Bortset fra på Bornholm er Bing forældet i Danmark.
archie (2016-04-03 15:05:15+00:00): Jeg anvender Geodatastyrelsen og ikke Bing da jeg tagger i Danmark!
Hjart (2016-04-03 15:06:45+00:00): Der står da ellers Bing i source ovenfor?
Hjart (2016-04-03 15:08:29+00:00): Og vestsiden af Vesterø havn havde du ændret tilbage til som den ser ud på Bing.
archie (2016-04-03 15:20:05+00:00): Førlåt. Det skedde vid conflict-løsningen. Var ikke meningen. Vill du venligst chekke en gang til, tak.
Hjart (2016-04-03 15:21:36+00:00): Ok :-)
R0bst3r (2016-04-07 08:55:25+00:00): Hello again,
again, please don't use your own words and don't change correct tags. Thanks!

For more info see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org
literan (2016-04-03 21:50:58+00:00): снова откатываю
5m4u9 (2016-04-03 18:18:13+00:00): gracias por añadir y mejorar esta parte del mapa...
mweper (2016-04-03 16:27:31+00:00): Hola Betiana. Para marcar estas cosas, por favor utiliza la herramienta online umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
--
Recuerda que lo que agregues en el mapa, es público y debe aportar datos que se pueda etiquetar con alguna categoría predefinida.
mweper (2016-04-03 16:31:05+00:00): Hola Analia. Para marcar estas cosas, por favor utiliza la herramienta online umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
-- 
Recuerda que lo que agregues en el mapa, es público y debe aportar datos que se pueda etiquetar con alguna categoría predefinida.
user_5359 (2016-04-04 17:12:01+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. I don't think that "hang gliding and paragliding take off point" is the name of the point, it is a description! and your new key "hang gliding and paragliding take off point" isn't a good idea (because spaces). Please look after the key ref or ref:<detail specification>
María Florencia Menéndez (2016-04-06 09:27:43+00:00): Sector Sur de la localidad, donde podemos encontrar importantes edificios como la Escuela N° 680, también un CENTRO HOSPITALARIO más conocido como dispensario.
flohoff (2016-04-04 06:53:14+00:00): Hi,
ich habe mal eben den Kreisverkehr nochmal gestreichelt.

Das oneway=yes soll nicht auf einen Kreisverkehr. Da gehört ein junction=roundabout drauf.

Ausserdem sollte die Straßenklasse des Kreisverkehrs die der höchstwertigen Klasse haben. In diesem fall sollte das ein tertiary sein - nicht unclassified. Ich habe das mal umgetagged.

Ach ja - und ich habe die beiden "railways" noch "entkoppelt". Wenn die da drauf enden dann werden vermutlich diverse validatoren fehler das ein "crossing" fehlt. Und ein Bahnübergang ist da ja nicht.

So long.

Flo
opendcc (2020-10-01 05:44:31+00:00): Hallo Michi,

der Fluch der Luftbildmalerei :-) Dieses 'Industriegebiet und die Gebäude' stehen jedes Jahr (dieses Jahr leider nicht) leicht anders :-) Auf dem aktuellen Luftbild sind sogar noch Autos zu sehen, deren Fahrer beschlossen hat, besser nicht mehr selbst zu fahren ...

Servus Wolfgang
miche101 (2020-10-01 10:14:42+00:00): Hi Wolfgang, 

ups *g* ... hast du geändert? bzw. wo? der Änderungssatz ist ein wenig groß. Müsste mal öfters hochladen damit die noch so groß werden.

Bin gerade in Haiming unterwegs ;)

Gruß Miche
opendcc (2020-10-01 10:45:28+00:00): Hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38268676#map=19/48.16658/12.32169&layers=N
opendcc (2020-10-01 10:46:35+00:00): PS: Haiming: dort wird gerade gestritten, ob und wie weit der Zugang zum Mündungsgebiet der Salzach gesperrt werden soll.
miche101 (2020-10-03 08:06:58+00:00): *g* Bierzelt ist wieder entfernt, das mir das nicht aufgefallen ist ;-)
opendcc (2016-04-03 18:49:38+00:00): Hallo,

vielleicht sollte man diese Straßen als Track, grade1, surface asphalt kennzeichnen. Dann bleiben sie beim Rendern besser sichtbar. Was meinst Du?
bike-xare (2016-04-04 18:09:44+00:00): Hallo,
ist vielleicht besser. Ich habe nur bei meiner letzten Tour bemerkt das mir mein Garmin diese Stecke nicht vorgeschlagen hat da ich nur Asphaltierte Stecken bevorzuge. Ich dachte das muss man ändern. Ist alles Asphalt. Du bist der Profi...was meinst du? Ich bin in der Gegend zu Hause und habe bemerkt das da mehrere routen meiner Meinung nicht ganz passen. Gruß bike-xare
opendcc (2016-04-04 18:39:58+00:00): Hallo,

habe gerade mit komoot probiert - der läßt highway service auch weg, wenn man den Renner wählt. Gegen wir mal auf track, grade1, surface aspalt. Und gucken, was die Router so draus machen.

PS: ich bin aus Mühldorf - auf dem Weg zum Turm komm ich da öfter vorbei ..
bike-xare (2016-04-04 19:03:48+00:00): Servus, wollte nur sagen das ich da noch ziemlich frisch bin . Mit "komoot, grade1, etc.. kann ich noch nicht so viel anfangen. Ich sehe nur was ich fahre. Und wie gesagt in dieser Gegend kenn ich mich wirklich aus. Ich weis vielleicht nicht wie ich das auf die Karte übertragen kann. Hilf mir einfach
opendcc (2016-04-04 19:49:47+00:00): Hallo,
Helfe ja schon: mit change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38300190 habe ich den kleinen Weg hinten rum von Reit nach Einharting mal geändert.
Alecs01 (2016-04-06 19:23:12+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che qui e altrove hai modificato la classificazione di alcuni centri abitati, es. Scanzorosciate che ha appena superato i 10 mila abitanti (di poche decine) è diventata town (era village); è solo per via degli abitanti o c'è un altro motivo? non sarei così "tranchant" sul limite dei 10 mila personalmente, è indicativo (non avrebbe senso che sempre Scanzorosciate torni village tra qualche mese se perde nuovamente poche decine di residenti)
Warin61 (2021-04-02 00:41:58+00:00): These 'Tanks' are not buildings out here, they are reservoirs, no roof +  built up embankments to contain water
Durko_freemap (2016-04-04 12:52:56+00:00): Zdravim, namiesto description=Jaskyňa pouzite natural=cave_entrance vid. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural%3Dcave_entrance , Vdaka za opravu, Durko
luschi (2016-04-23 18:47:28+00:00): Danke dass du die Straße korrigiert hast.
Habe gerade bemerkt, dass der Fehler in mein Navi übernommen wurde :(
Dann muss ich wohl auf ein Update warten.
apm-wa (2016-05-03 17:22:52+00:00): Этого здания нет.  Его снесли в прошлом году.  Советую использовать более новый снимок, ссылка: http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
apm-wa (2016-05-03 17:23:24+00:00): Этого здания нет. Его снесли в прошлом году. Советую использовать более новый снимок, ссылка: http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
apm-wa (2016-05-03 17:23:38+00:00): Этого здания нет. Его снесли в прошлом году. Советую использовать более новый снимок, ссылка: http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
user_5359 (2016-04-04 17:58:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't delete a building because the description is wrong! I have revert your changeset and move the school description to the right place https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2552794405. Please check the values.
chillly (2016-04-03 17:24:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.

If the footpaths are rights of way you could add designation=public_footpath (or public_bridleway) in England and Wales.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask by replying.
fkv (2018-02-07 19:40:13+00:00): In http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1085594 behauptet jemand, dass der Güterweg Fuchs nicht so heißt. Den Namen hast anscheinend du gesetzt (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158549749/history). Weißt du noch warum, bzw. kannst du das abklären?
user_5359 (2016-04-04 18:00:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
SK53 (2016-04-04 19:14:26+00:00): This is a mechanical edit: I very much doubt if you have visited these places or checked each way. Besides there is no need at all to alter ##mph to ## mph: parsing a speed limit is straightforward with or without the space.

In general the UK/GB community dislikes mass edits even for good reasons: this is not one of them.
trigpoint (2016-04-04 12:00:58+00:00): Please can you point me to the discussion about these mass edits and how you see it a a typo?
The space separator is optional, consumers are able to handle speed limits in either format.
Are you able to point me to a time when an OSM based satnav has given you misleading information due to there not being a space?
Ropino (2016-04-04 19:11:48+00:00): Hello,
for me was the basis:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
"If the speed limit should be specified in a different unit the unit can be added to the end of the value, separated by a space"
or
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units#Common_mistakes
+ in JOSM-validator: "unusual maxspeed format"
SomeoneElse (2016-04-04 20:28:05+00:00): @Ropino Anyone parsing speed limits is already going to allow for the space before "mph", and is going to have to consider doing so because you have made no attempt to talk to people who added speed limits without a space before "mph", so they will continue to do so.  Personally when tagging a speed limit on a road that I've visited I'd add a space, but both versions are perfectly legible.  
I would strongly suggest that you read and inwardly digest http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .  There are very few rules in there (most boil down to "don't be a dick") but OSM is a collaborative project and we need to work together.  It really wouldn't have been difficult to post to the talk-gb list saying "I'm proposing to change all the speed limits in the UK without spaces before mph - does that sound OK?".  You didn't do this before your last series of mechanical edits of this type in late 2014, and you haven't done it before these in April 2016.
At a quick glance, very few of your edits in the UK since 2014 add any value at all, and some have been reverted for the usual reason (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28122531 ).
Given that the weather in the northern hemisphere is now much nicer and the days are longer, I'd strongly suggest that you Go Outside and Map Something instead :)  .
skorasaurus (2016-04-09 15:34:47+00:00): 
hey, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for fixing this :) 

Regards from a fellow Clevelander.
R0bst3r (2016-04-07 09:53:22+00:00): Hello again,
I've reverted this changeset. please take care what you upload into OSM database.

Maybe http://learnosm.org is a good starting point.
Ogmios (2016-04-06 19:24:47+00:00): 👍🏿
chillly (2016-04-03 17:46:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I think you have added a name to an area of grass which was added by someone else. The grass overlaps an area of woodland - it can't be both woods and grass. You have added the name Forestry Commission to the grass. The area might be operated by the Forestry Commission but that's probably isn't the name of the area. If you are a local you are best placed to sort this out - even though it's not of your making! 

If you need help or information please feel free to ask by replying.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-11 17:21:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3631506067/history

I removed steps tag here based on object history - it seems that it was missed when it become tagged as kissing gate

feel free to revert me if my guess is wrong
b-unicycling (2022-08-26 10:15:01+00:00): stile=stw?
(If it helps, I found one where I had mistyped, too, but at least I had taken mapillary at the time, so I could check what I meant. I'm just going through this https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stile#values to find all the strange ones.)
dudone (2022-08-26 19:48:03+00:00): Changed to stepover.  I think that is the last.  Unfortunately JOSM doesn't highlight these types of typos and there is just too much basic stuff to map.  I do take lots of pictures.  20K short of 1M on file.  No good for Mapillary as I'd need to check everyone.  Someday, I will find time to produce my on map of images.
Hopefully that's it.  I'm afraid I'd rather spend my time adding new items given the poor coverage we still have in the UK in many areas so these wont be the last unless the QC on JOSM improves.

Dudley
b-unicycling (2022-08-26 21:31:52+00:00): Using JOSM explains it. I have mapped a lot of houses as building=h+some muddle, because of the autocomplete in JOSM. Sometimes, people point it out.
It's a good thing I dive in and out of topics, so the QC is random, but at least it gets done sometimes. Thanks for fixing them all!
SomeoneElse (2016-04-05 00:47:20+00:00): Hi,
Something went a bit wrong here - you added a node at latitude 0, longitude 0.  I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy
CartoCharles (2016-04-05 08:44:57+00:00): Thank you.
Mike Baggaley (2016-05-08 22:42:03+00:00): Is Rayleigh Road no longer the A1015? Please either remove ref=A1015 or reinstate highway=primary. Thanks.
h2g2bob (2016-05-10 00:00:23+00:00): Hi, the A1015 continues down Rayleigh Road here, but this is no longer the main route used by traffic. Out of 15,000 cars going along Rayleigh Road, 13,000 continue along Whitehouse Road (according to https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=17kjyGeMlh5qOb0UD3a2VwaxD173Cjssy61SDQ_Y#map:id=3 ). In this change, I also made Whitehouse Road and Nestuda Way (officially a B-road, but actually a large dual carriageway). My feeling is that this makes the map more useful by showing the wider, more useful and more popular roads as the primary route.
trigpoint (2016-05-10 11:50:37+00:00): Hi h2g2bob
I am not sure that google docs is a valid source of information for OSM, especially as the map it contains is from a source that must never ever be used in OSM.
In OSM we map what exists and we can survey and verify on the ground, not what we feel makes a more useful map.
This change should be reverted back to the signage that appears on the ground.
Cheers Phil