piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Russx02 (2020-10-29 18:56:22+00:00): Hey Fran,
I only swap over to Bing when I’m trying to confirm if there’s a building there or not. Will it help more if I avoid that? Thanks so much for your help!!
Frans S (2020-10-30 10:43:08+00:00): hello Russx02,
I think it is not a good idea to switch every time you want to check an object on both imageries.
Bing is in this region a very old imagery (apppr 2009-2016)
Maxar Premium is more recent. 
It occurs that when you compare the imagers, Bing shows buildings and Maxar shows an abadoned dwelling or nothing,
When the building still exist, it wil be shown on both imageries.
The other way around, Bing can show an empty area, nothing mapped and when you switch to Maxar Premium you can find a complete new village or industrial estated.
This is an area where nomadic tribes live They move regulary, leaving old settlements behind.
Best regards
Russx02 (2020-10-30 14:10:04+00:00): Awesome, thanks so much Frans S! This is great help as I’m new to this and just getting the hang of it. I appreciate all your help!
phidauex (2021-01-15 22:47:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this new neighborhood. I see you used the "building=house" tag, but you drew the property lines. We don't typically map parcel boundaries, and the building tag is intended for the shape of the actual building. Can you update to an approximation of the actual building shape rather than the property lines? Thanks!
naveenpf (2020-10-30 11:33:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93141474
pesec (2020-10-30 05:20:38+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы название ваших правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
GinaroZ (2020-10-29 17:15:28+00:00): Did you notice that the buildings and other roads are not aligned to Bing?
Firemix (2020-10-27 22:24:45+00:00): Hi Jubal (correct?),

may you please split the fixed from the still unfixed (source=Landsat) segments?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93142604

Kind regards,
Firemix
jharpster (2020-10-28 22:06:31+00:00): Hi Firemix. I worked on it a bit more. The imagery gets worse as you get upstream. Cheres.
mariotomo (2020-12-10 21:48:28+00:00): hi, thank you for pointing out the presence of buildings in rural areas.  if you don't intend to draw the shape orientation size, please simply put a node with building=yes, that would be more appreciated. we have a Telegram group if you want to join us, you would be very welcome, as we have not so many mappers in Panama.
mariotomo (2020-12-10 21:50:36+00:00): in the area you mapped, I think that Maxar looks newer.
mariotomo (2020-12-04 14:19:32+00:00): Hi, I see this edit of yours in Panamá. we indeed use Bing to align what's mapped, even if Maxar may have better imaging in some areas.  would you care to join our discussion group on Telegram?
opendcc (2021-06-06 08:25:52+00:00): Covered=yes, handrail? auf der ganzen Länge?
santon (2021-06-06 12:50:13+00:00): Auf der Route (Fußwegroute Prienbach - Stubenberg) ist keine solche Markierung. Aber welcher Teil ist gemeint? Habe ich eine andere Änderung durchgeführt und mit dieser Route gemeinsam abgespeichert?
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-11-21 01:07:22+00:00): porque colocou tree row no parque das naçoes onde ja existiam arvores colocadas?
FasterTracker (2020-12-29 05:11:17+00:00): Olá!

Eu fiz isto já há algum tempo mas sei que, na maioria dos casos, as linhas que estão atualmente como "tree row" já existiam previamente. 
Como o título da changeset indica, essas ditas linhas não continham qualquer tag. 
(Eventualmente por serem linhas auxiliares ou simplesmente por puro esquecimento). 

Uma vez que linhas do género já existiam na área e como a maioria das árvores mapeadas estavam dispostas em linha, eu tomei a liberdade de mapear o "tree row" uma vez que se encaixa na definição que se encontra na wiki.

Espero que tenha esclarecido a sua dúvida. Qualquer outra questão, estarei sempre disposto para responder.

P.S: Sou novo no OSM por isso ainda não consigui perceber o sistema de notificações, daí a demora na minha resposta.
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-12-29 11:25:08+00:00): Correcto, concordo totalmente com a explicação e intenção, as linhas inicialmente serviam de guias de construção de forma a todos os pontos ficarem colados nessa mesma linha e não soltos. Só não entendi porque descolou a linha dos pontos e duplicou uma linha de arvores que na realidade não existe. Como fizeram em iguais situações que eu deixei linha sem etiqueta, a mesma foi deixada no lugar e apenas etiquetada correctamente de forma a corresponder uma row onde se encaixam os pontos de arvores. Não há problema no atraso de resposta. Cumprimentos.
FasterTracker (2020-12-31 01:04:31+00:00): Okay. Percebi que cometi um erro visto que mapeei árvores fantasmas. :D

Desse modo, eu posso corrigir o mesmo mas preciso de saber que ways em especifíco é que isso não se aplica.


Relativamente às restantes linhas. 
Esta edição vem de um esforço da comunidade para completar/remover os pontos e linhas que não estejam etiquetados.
Desse modo, as linhas que efetivamente representam uma coluna de árvores, pensas que vale a pena reverter a edição?
fabiotofy (2020-10-28 20:18:38+00:00): Ciao, sai per caso se hanno attribuito un nome a se per la via di accesso di Amazon? o è sempre via maestri del lavoro ? ultima cosa, sai che civico gli hanno assegnato ? Grazie
Lex legis (2020-10-28 20:38:05+00:00): cercando ho trovato che risulta come "Amazon Italia Transport [DFV1]", Via Maestri del Lavoro ma senza il civico; la via d'accesso non mi è noto se ha un nome
fabiotofy (2020-10-29 13:01:44+00:00): ok, grazie. farò anche io qualche ricerca in merito
Polarbear (2020-11-02 21:50:42+00:00): Lieber Geofreund1,
danke, dass du hier Adressen erfasst, das ist grade wichtig in OSM. 
 
Praktisch wäre, wenn du die gleich postalisch komplett erfasst, d.h. mit PLZ und addr:country=DE. 
 
Ich habe mir in JOSM das Adress-Preset auf eine fingerbrecher-freie Hotkey gelegt. Das Preset schreibt dann die einmal eingegebenen Stammdaten der Adresse auch bei neuen Hausnummern fort. 

Viele Grüsse
Geofreund1 (2020-11-03 08:52:59+00:00): Hallo Polarbear,
Ich bin der Auffassung, dass PLZ durch die entsprechenden Relationen erfasst sind und DE überflüssig ist, da durch Admin Relation auch schon erfasst.
Ortsnamen trage ich ein, da einige QS Werkzeuge sich schwer tun, wenn eine Straße mit demselben Namen in zwei benachbarten Orten vorkommt.
Ich begrüße es sehr, wenn du dich für das Eintragen von Adressen in Brandburg engagieren willst! Allein ist das schon zuweilen etwas mühsam.
Polarbear (2020-11-03 19:21:09+00:00): Geofreund1,
natürlich will dich niemand zwingen, PLZ und Land anzugeben. Die Denkweise, man könne ja die Daten aus der geografischen Beziehung ableiten, ist nicht neu, aber die Datennutzer tun sich schwer damit, da es die Komplexität einer Abfrage um Grössenordnungen komplizierter macht. 
Und sei beruhigt, allein musst du die Adressen nicht eintragen. Das war nie so und wird auch nie so sein :-)
SamosaBelz (2020-10-28 15:42:38+00:00): Powinno być "construction=unclassified"
SamosaBelz (2020-10-28 15:43:54+00:00): Radziłbym też usunąć tag "name" i napisać "unsigned_ref=107710L"
Firemix (2020-10-27 22:16:59+00:00): What about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369171265/history ?
JessAk71 (2020-10-27 22:33:28+00:00): The point could for sure be merged into the poly. I just didnt make that change to preserve the change history on the point and its not easy to do in Potlatch 2 but feel free to make the change if you like.
Firemix (2020-10-27 23:05:22+00:00): To make it clear I always enjoy the creation of airport ways in place of the GNIS nodes ;)
So are you always skipping the node-area merge in your current process?
JessAk71 (2020-10-27 23:10:33+00:00): For the most part Ill skip it but I havent been making airport poly additions systematically, only when I see certain size ones in areas I am working in that dont have a poly Ill add one.
kartler175 (2020-10-28 11:09:35+00:00): Was hat Änderung von http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZsW in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4036226#map=11/50.2048/7.6661 mit der Verbesserung von tags zu tun?
Warum die neue Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11801371 ?
Warum die Änderung von http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zt0 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1705924#map=12/50.4769/7.4300 ?
LightSpirit (2020-10-28 14:07:43+00:00): Ein User hatte Probleme mit der Compilierung einer Karte im Raum Koblenz, weil nach seiner Annahme die Flußfläche vom Rhein im Raum Koblenz gravierende Fehler aufwies. Der Flußflächenmultipolygon des Rheins kreuzt sich quer durch Koblenz. Da waren viele Fehler drin. Ich habe angefangen die Fehler rauszubekommen, dann mußte ich weg, als ich wieder zu Hause war, habe ich von Kaub bis ca. Andernach den Rhein in Ordnung bekommen. Habe aktuell noch Probleme mit zwei Rheininseln, es kann sein, dass ihre neue Relation zum Rhein etwas länger braucht, damit sie nicht mehr vom Wasser durchdrängt werden.

Ich brauche Hilfe, ich bekomme das mit meinem Wissen nicht mehr hin, ich habe sonst alles hinbekommen, aber am Rhein bin ich gescheitert. Ich bitte dich mir zu helfen, indem du den Rhein korrigierst, wenn du dir das zutraust.

Liebe Grüße
Oliver (LightSpirit)
Nakaner (2020-10-28 08:46:55+00:00): Hallo,

als Betreiber tragen wir einen Firmennamen ein, keine Website. Bitte lösche daher das operator=www.kvv.de von den Bushaltestellen. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4501707188

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93143742
ElliottPlack (2020-11-11 17:55:53+00:00): Hello again, this edit, like the other one in the Chesapeake, inadvertently broke the coastline here. The Indian River Bay is covered by a water relation, and thus does not need to have the coastline cover it as well. The coastline should end on the downstream edge of the water relation. I reverted this changeset and updated the coastline accordingly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93143748
Frans S (2020-10-28 11:16:20+00:00): Hello Siya. Thanks for mapping here
You mapped here a school, Once as 1 big building (collecting all buildings and call it 1 building) and individual buildings. (correct)
Don't add names , These ware already mapped as an amenty.
Best regards
eggie (2020-10-28 19:49:10+00:00): Beste dr Merry.. Zou je concreet willen aangeven wat je hebt bijgewerkt. 
MVG,
eggie
olo81 (2020-12-04 00:04:47+00:00): znowu nadawanie nazw drogom dojazdowym
C2oc4 (2020-12-04 06:57:58+00:00): droga wew ale podległa pod um
olo81 (2020-12-04 17:26:18+00:00): Nie ma znaczenia komu podlega droga, jeśli w terenie nie ma tabliczek z nazwą nie nanosimy jej.
olo81 (2020-12-04 17:28:37+00:00): aa, place zabaw też overpassem pociągnąłem 

ten tag crossing=marked też zaraz poprawie, ręcznie to całkiem bez sensu a overpassem 5 minut :x
olo81 (2020-12-04 17:33:59+00:00): oj, jednak to nie będzie takie proste, w dodatku widzę że więcej osób stosuje ten tag :/  Trzeba skonsultować czy to nie jest przypadkiem jakiś wynalazek ID  i jednak jest dopuszczony.
C2oc4 (2020-12-04 19:05:32+00:00): sporo osób tak robi ja zgapiłem z innego miasta; czasem nie ma tabliczki ale np na geoportal jest nazwa
olo81 (2020-12-05 05:16:23+00:00): Geoportal ma inne podejście do dróg.
C2oc4 (2020-12-05 06:18:35+00:00): hehe ten nasz piękny kraj zadziwia mnie dzień w dzień
czubi (2020-10-28 09:42:30+00:00): Du hattest um Review gebeten. Deine Eintragungen sind korrekt :-)
Welche Hintergrundkarte man verwendet kann man im CS noch angeben. Wenn du die ESRI Karten verwendest könntest du die Lagegenauigkeit einiger Pfade noch verbessern wenn du andere KArten verwendest könntest du statt dessen die ESRI Karten als Hintergrund nutzen, dann  kannst du die Lage genauer einschätzen, die Karten sind besser
Spike1505 (2020-10-29 08:33:15+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Feedback. Ein paar Fragen habe ich zu deiner Rückmeldung: - - - Was bedeutet CS?
- Sind die ESRI-Karten genauer?
czubi (2020-10-29 09:11:57+00:00): CS =Changeset=Änderundsatz. Jedesmal wenn du was hochlädtst kannst du angeben welchen Hintergrund du genutzt hast. Du kannst den Hacken auch standardmäßig setzen.  ESRI ist genauer und viieell klarer bzw. deutlicher und auch aktueller.
Frans S (2020-10-28 10:30:56+00:00): here are some pictures how to identify round buildings
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-KsbmGDtomKLTE1pZldPun1Mz02zMoD4/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bb5HOnaEkQjmjoHv1dX2jbNhyJSKvKEz/view?usp=sharing
Best regards
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:57:36+00:00): Hello Siya Sharma.
Will you please stop mapping highways?
You are, sorry to say, making a mess of them
Why:
1. This is a building only project
2. You use the wrong tags. fi: tagging local roads as  a major highway  (See these guidelines how to map highways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa )
3 You don't connect the highways together.
4 you let roads cross buildings. 
You made so many errors here that I have to remove these mappings. 
You marked this task as complete mapped. On Maxar Premium Imagery (Prescribed) are many more builidings visible which still have to be mapped.
Best regard
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93144288
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:48:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
btw; This is a building only project. Please focus on that. (You overlooked some buildings)

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93144427
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:44:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93144576
olo81 (2020-11-17 16:45:56+00:00): Punkty adresowe były importowane z  Państwowego Rejestru Granic więc nazwy ulic są oficjalne. Nie zmieniamy nazw ulic czy punktów adresowych po swojemu. 
Nazwa ulicy również jest niepoprawna. Można ją znaleźć na tabliczkach montowanych na ulicach lu rejestrach państwowych. 
Nawet wchodząc na poszczególne strony firm położonych przy tej ulicy są prawidłowe nazwy : http://termyrzymskie.pl/pl/kontakt
olo81 (2020-11-17 17:51:10+00:00): Znowu dodajesz nazwy do dróg dojazdowych. Nie wszystkie drogi muszą mieć nazwę.
C2oc4 (2020-11-17 20:58:13+00:00): Faktyczna nazwa nie jest dehnelow tylko ta długa co była tabliczki nie mówią nigdy p całej ulicy np nie pisze biskupa Adama smigielskiego lub marszałka Józefa smigielskiego lub rotmistrza itp na każdej tabliczce czy słupie
olo81 (2020-11-17 21:19:53+00:00): Czyli wszystkie źródła państwowe, tabliczki, punkty adresowe są błędne? 
Jeśli długa nazwa jest prawidłowa podaj źródło tych danych.
olo81 (2020-11-17 21:47:18+00:00): Punkty adresowe i nazwy ulic możesz sprawdzić na geoportalu 
https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:42:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93144712
eggie (2020-10-27 22:20:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-28 12:17:09+00:00): Dag dr Merry.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) en precies ingemeten. Het lijkt me niet juist om dit te gaan aanpassen. Op grond van wat?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-28 12:20:48+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw weer uitgelijnd volgens de BGT omtrekgericht. Probeer svp aan te geven wat je edits inhouden. Er staat alleen maar steeds 'bijgewerkt'?  
Hier kun je vinden hoe je de BGT omtrekgericht op de achtergrond kunt zetten van josm.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
gr eggie
MVG,
eggie
mweper (2020-10-29 18:48:46+00:00): Bienvenido Bruno, gracias por colaborar. 
Te comento que para tener una referencia del nombre anterior de la calle se le puede dejar el nombre Uriburu con la etiqueta old_name=*
brunoalgrain (2020-10-29 19:14:59+00:00): Gracias! Bueno, ya me queda de experiencia para la próxima! Eso ya lo pudiste corregir vos o lo tengo que volver a modificar?
mweper (2020-10-29 19:30:36+00:00): Yo no toque nada por ahora. Si queres, te lo dejo que lo hagas vos. ;D
brunoalgrain (2020-10-29 20:25:03+00:00): Excelente, me desocupo en el trabajo y lo hago
eggie (2020-10-28 06:58:14+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
dominikschwind (2020-11-01 13:42:26+00:00): Ich wohne in diesem Quadrat und kann durch einen Blick aus dem Fenster validieren, dass mindestens drei Gebäude vor dem Changeset richtig waren, die durch das Changeset falsch wurden. 

~~

I'm living in this area and just looking out of the window I can see that at least three buildings have been changed from appearing properly on the map to now being wrong.
GUFSZ (2023-04-14 05:45:05+00:00): Gab es eine Reaktion auf diesen CS Kommentar auf anderem Wege. Auch in Form einer Korrektur?
dominikschwind (2023-04-14 07:09:52+00:00): Nein
eggie (2020-10-28 07:08:03+00:00): Beste AT  Svp niet zelf adressen aanmaken. Die zijn al aanwezig. De bedrijven zijn samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnodes.
Het juiste format is en postcode zonder spatie.
MVG,
eggie
mariotomo (2021-10-06 18:06:38+00:00): hola Kaart, I'm glad you're reviewing the classification of these fictive links. I hope you would play a more active role removing them as we move to representing these intersections using turn:lanes.
gileri (2020-10-28 19:22:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention, ça fait plusieurs fois que vous fusionnez des nœuds ensemble.

Ici c'est celui-là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2202116600/
eggie (2020-10-28 07:04:27+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 11:57:58+00:00): Hi,
Why are you removing names written in Latin letters and replacing them with Arabic names?
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:41:50+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Your mappings are not that accurate and squared.
Please change the imagery you use to MAXAR PREMIUM
Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93146206
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:39:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93146356
Frans S (2020-10-28 09:39:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93146360
jaap de vries (2020-10-28 08:17:21+00:00): Als je winkels aanpast, wil je dan ook opletten op de verouderden winkeltags, bijvoorbeeld van Zeeman en Scapino. Je krijg een melding om de tags te vernieuwen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=2783520708#map=19/51.95735/5.56795 Het is een kleine moeite om dit meteen goed te doen. Ik loop ze wel even na.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-28 10:03:36+00:00): Een second opinion wordt zeker gewaardeerd. Ik doe m'n best om alles goed te doen, maar natuurlijk kan ik ook dingen over het hoofd zien.
eggie (2020-10-28 07:01:16+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:00:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93146698