piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:41:40+00:00): I will revert this for the fake secondary roads
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
alexashh (2021-04-08 22:57:09+00:00): Приветствую!
Спасибо что вы добавляете данные на карту, это здорово, но хочу обратить внимание на несколько ошибок:
изменение building:levels у здания с 9 на 1. Видимо, вы хотели указать на каком этаже находится организация, эта информация указывается на точке самой организации. Сейчас же вы изменили высоту всего дома.

В теге точки салона вы использовали тег amenity=place_of_warship. Это тег для места поклонения - церкви, мечети, храма, Центр подологии скорее относится к салонам красоты (shop=beauty). 

И уже не ошибка, а скорее пожелание, не принято писать в тег name описание салона, ну то есть, кажется, в OSM лучше написать "name=Секрет", а то что это центр подологии уточнить соответсвующими тегами которые показывают на чём специализируется салон красоты - beauty=podology

Ещё раз, спасибо за ваш вклад
alexashh (2021-04-08 23:02:53+00:00): С уточнением направления не всё так просто, судя по сайту, в центре делают и косметический маникюр и педикюр, тогда в тег специализации "beauty=*" стоит указать универсальный и популярный тег "beauty=nails", а специализацию подология можно указать через "health_specialty:podology=yes"

Поправьте меня если я не прав
gatecrashernn (2021-04-09 23:23:13+00:00): да все правильно
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
BCNorwich (2021-04-14 07:26:28+00:00): Hi another duplicated highway removed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-30 23:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103938152 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:45:08+00:00): Also reverting this for the secondary ways
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
literan (2021-04-08 16:24:05+00:00): это не линк между двумя разными дорогами, а начало tertiary-дороги, просто раздвоенное.

линк - он обычно на пересечениях (например МКАД-Ленинградка)
Grass-snake (2021-04-08 17:37:02+00:00): А highway=tertiary_link нормально будет?
literan (2021-04-08 17:56:10+00:00): так в том то и дело, что это не линк...
Grass-snake (2021-04-08 20:02:01+00:00): Хорошо, тогда можно дать этой дороге название "Куркинское шоссе"? Вы 2 недели назад в чате советовали присвоить имя этой дороге, но потом iWowik предложил _link и мне это решение показалось более "правильным".
literan (2021-04-08 20:07:47+00:00): конечно, это Куркинское шоссе (просто таким образом устроено его примыкание к Ленинградке). И навигатор должен говорить здесь, как я полагаю, "Поверните направо на Куркинское шоссе".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:46+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:48+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:51+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:52+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:53+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 10:07:54+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key  Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102522590
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Russ McD (2021-12-26 08:56:13+00:00): This road circles a school playground - it should be obvious.  Why tag as residential ?  If you must add every single road you see please try and tag correctly - Im sure you dont want Grab taxis driving over the children leaving school !
hari_setty (2022-04-18 11:34:30+00:00): Hello RussMcd,

Trust you are well. Thanks for reviewing the data. We will make sure to follow the policy for the rest of the scenarios.

Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
wireguy (2021-04-08 12:32:28+00:00): Hi MathO24.  What you consider clutter was put there by Amazon to help route their drivers.   If you are concerned with clutter, you could reduce the number of nodes used to create sidewalks.  Please revert this change.
MathO24 (2021-04-16 03:54:07+00:00): Hello! Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was referring to [this](http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Should-driveways-be-on-OSM-td5855643.html#a5855753) thread that mentions specifically mapping the long ones based on the location. Considering there is a majority of unmapped, short, and private residential driveways, I assumed these were obsolete. Let me know if you need anything else :)
Minh Nguyen (2021-04-16 21:55:40+00:00): That was the general sentiment a long time ago, when we were daunted by the challenge of mapping every road and meanwhile found it annoying that imported TIGER roads often misclassified driveways as through roads. (If I’m not mistaken, at the time, the map legend in the right sidebar even said that the building polygons were only for “important” buildings.) These days, OpenStreetMap has evolved to consider any driveway and building important enough for inclusion in the database.

You can use http://revert.osmz.ru/ to revert this changeset before someone comes along and creates a conflicting edit (which most likely would recreate some of the driveways). If there’s already a conflicting edit by the time you get to it, just ask and one of us can help you out with it.

Years-old mailing list threads can still be useful for context on perennial debates in OpenStreetMap, but it’s best to take them with a grain of salt and ask around for second opinions. You can subscribe to that mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us/ or ask the larger U.S. community in OSMUS Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ ).
MathO24 (2021-04-17 00:16:48+00:00): Thanks for the information! I tried to revert it, but it gave me a system error. What would you advise I do?
wireguy (2021-04-17 00:31:50+00:00): I revert merged in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103084767
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 00:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103121007 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103365292 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
ovruni (2021-04-08 05:58:01+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han modificado y eliminado partes de fronteras de limites administrativos, lo cual rompia relaciones de distritos en OSM. De la misma forma se han modificado vías para agregar descripciones en la etiqueta de nombre [0], lo cual es desaconsejado. Por este motivo he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
ovruni (2021-04-08 06:02:09+00:00): Aquí dejo el enlace de la documentación sobre el uso de descripciones en nombres.

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103365292 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
trigpoint (2021-04-08 15:45:26+00:00): Hi, in this edit you seem to have created a very small duplicate hospital.
I have removed this duplication.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-30 23:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103938152 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 08:38:21+00:00): Hi jcnbiscocho,
I have fixed the alignment,as building overlapping with residnetial road at node 8605007103,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102914172.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102524483
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.