piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:04:41+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
andershl (2021-08-04 20:07:03+00:00): Please note that the correct names (greenlandic and danish) were put at a point in the glacier area a couple of years ago for later multipolygon rendering. Similarly for other glaciers in the area....
b-unicycling (2022-08-27 07:30:15+00:00): Hi, could you check whether any of the documented values for stile would fit better than "press"? This is the only occurrence of that value globally.
L'imaginaire (2020-12-28 09:13:14+00:00): 👍
TheBestIdea (2021-01-14 22:43:40+00:00): Hi Promiseofbirth,

The bike lanes on Broadway/5th Ave are not protected from car traffic between 25th and 23rd Streets--they are normal painted lanes--so they cannot not be mapped as separate ways. They have to be mapped on the main way as cycleway=lane. 

And even for protected bike lanes.  There is generally no need to turn them all into separate cycleways. The cycleway=track tag works perfectly well and is preferable for situations where the bike lane isn't protected for the entire stretch.
OldManCelli (2021-02-25 16:24:25+00:00): Is there a reason why way 889116025 was created so that it overlaps a segment of 663666549? I'm just trying to understand what you were trying to do here.
AdriannaaG (2021-02-25 18:02:54+00:00): I apologize.. I was trying to fix a mistake I did :'( IMMMM SOORRRRYYY..
OldManCelli (2021-02-25 19:19:35+00:00): Ah - no problem. easy enough to fix. I was just curious.
ortho_is_hot (2020-12-28 14:47:45+00:00): G'day MarkusNC,

I've reverted these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96543332

Unless something has changed within the past month, I recall that both of these roads are accessible to vehicles (not bicycle only). It could be possible that at least parts of them are oneway however recent LPI imagery (as well as my own recollections) suggest that they aren't. If I am incorrect please do let me know.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
FraukeLeo (2021-06-15 18:51:57+00:00): Hallo pravallg, du hast hier einen highway=service zwischen der Autobahn und der Bergshäuser Straße eingezeichnet. So wie gemappt ist das eine nutzbare Auf- und Abfahrt, die von Routern auch genutzt wird: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.26425%2C9.51243%3B51.26359%2C9.51628#map=18/51.26427/9.51435 

Das kann ich mir kaum vorstellen, die Zufahrt ist sicher nur für Autobahndienste freigegeben. Dann gehört unbedingt noch access=no daran.
pravallg (2021-06-18 11:00:31+00:00): Hi FraukeLeo, 
Sorry for the delayed response and thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edit as per the roads visible from the aerial imagery. Apologies, I have ignored the road class of the adjoining roads. I completely agree that the access restriction is perfectly apt for this scenario. Thanks for improving my edit and providing the detailed explanation. Going forward, I will make sure to check the highway tag of the vicinity before adding new roads. Thanks for the feedback. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
pravallg
FraukeLeo (2021-06-18 15:24:06+00:00): Thanks for your reply. Now you see why it is not considered best practice to just add anything looking like a road into the database as one without ground survey :) Where there’s a highly active community, as there is in Germany, you may trust them that every road of any importance has been mapped already. If you are unsure what’s really there, drop a note for the local mappers to look after :) The left branch of the western end seems to be blocked by a guard rail, see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=152971290104390
nevw (2020-12-28 13:30:23+00:00): I reverted changesets 96517752 which added your business details to the Melbourne Airport boundary.
aharvey (2020-12-29 02:55:19+00:00): Usually I'd just snap the admin boundaries to the river because mostly the boundaries do follow the river.
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 03:07:30+00:00): Thanks, yeah seeing as the river defines the bound it seems reasonable. My comment was mostly for osmcha watchers to explain any flags; I didn't unglue anything.
aceman444 (2021-03-14 13:10:33+00:00): Hi, why the addition of aerodrome=international? There is no such tag documented and the information was already in aerodrome:type=international .
nevw (2020-12-28 13:31:21+00:00): I reverted this changeset which added business details to the Melbourne Airport boundary.
nevw (2020-12-28 13:35:14+00:00): What you have done is considered vandalism.
Please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business listing at the building you operate from in to the OSM with suitable tags.
ivanbranco (2021-12-28 11:26:16+00:00): Hi Arun,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/861290708/history

place=Industry is not a valid value.
Maybe check if  man_made=works fits in
!bm (2020-12-28 12:39:38+00:00): Hey,
an den Baum https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4495745931 hast du stars=* gesetzt, wohl start_date=* gemeint, aber den Baum gab es schon früher – evt ist das für den neuen Radständer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8266133184
--bg!bm
tordans (2020-12-28 18:22:00+00:00): Danke, Typo …

Hatte den Baum scheinbar nicht gelöscht zwischendurch. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.4747051&lng=13.449469099972223&z=17&tab=uploads&focus=photo&pKey=bmyW8oUogmxFZx6i66HPAk&x=0.5427774324838442&y=0.4827409823777583&zoom=0 zeigt, dass er am 28.10.2020 noch nicht da war (auch 17.11. noch nicht https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.47498669999999&lng=13.449348499972189&z=17&tab=uploads&focus=photo&pKey=9RFJx6VmhSvyq0F21dP52q&dateFrom=2020-10-31&x=0.5199808022826997&y=0.4198308310350913&zoom=0). Aber dann am 19.11.2020 war er da https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.4749436&lng=13.449356599972223&z=17&tab=uploads&focus=photo&pKey=hq9vJ9YgkQzg7hSVCijn4V&dateFrom=2020-10-31&x=0.43680639377723807&y=0.28350836239814786&zoom=0. Das Holz drumrum ist auch ein guter Indikator für eine der 2020iger Pflanzungen.

Danke fürs Prüfen!
Dan069 (2020-12-28 09:27:29+00:00): Will be completed in 2030
PT-53 (2020-12-28 09:25:17+00:00): Hallo Flo,
dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889136106/history
ist in Wirklichkeit kleiner.
Stichwort: Maps4BW
FloWeissenrieder (2020-12-29 08:59:53+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
wurde an Maps4BW angepasst.
Grüße
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
Russbiggs (2020-12-28 21:55:17+00:00): This footprint doesnt match any of the satellite imagery.  Why have you changed the building footprint back?
PT-53 (2020-12-28 09:23:18+00:00): Hallo Flo,
diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889137030/history
liegt in Wirklichkeit 4 Meter weiter westlich.
Du hast mal wieder den Luftbild-Versatz nicht korrigiert.
Bitte berichtigen.

Grüße und einen Guten Rutsch
FloWeissenrieder (2020-12-29 09:00:49+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
wurde berichtigt. 
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Futur3r (2020-12-28 17:26:12+00:00): Salut, les erreurs arrivent mais fait attention quand tu upload tes modifications, tu viens de supprimer une portion de voie rapide au lieu de remodifier le tag !

Je te conseil d'utiliser JOSM, c'est peut être un peu étrangé au début mais JOSM à un très bon programme de vérification des erreurs.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96520344
Futur3r (2020-12-28 17:47:51+00:00): j'ai fait la correction
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96520344
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_5239402 (2020-12-28 10:31:17+00:00): 안녕하세요. 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다! 오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 바뀜 집합 주석이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다. "는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다. 당신이 무엇을했고 당신의 출처가 무엇이었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지 합니다.
Russbiggs (2020-12-28 21:52:40+00:00): Why have you changed the building footprint after my edit?  The footprint in this edit does not match any of the satellite sources.
Vinber (2020-12-28 09:08:38+00:00): Bonjour,
je me suis permis de mettre la page facebook dans contact:facebook, plus adapté je pense que website : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8133389760
Bonne cartographie
hendrix33 (2020-12-28 09:23:22+00:00): Bonjour,
entendu, merci
user_3022894 (2021-05-04 12:43:25+00:00): Hallo KnoppiNRW,
habe eine kurze Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129972400 und zwar würde man da glaube ich nicht "Leerstand" als Name für das Gebäude verwenden. Stattdessen könnte man building:use=none taggen, also um auszusagen, dass das Gebäude zur Zeit nicht genutzt wird.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
Futur3r (2020-12-28 17:47:36+00:00): Salut, pour tes modifs de voie partagée cyclable/piéton au niveau de la Route de Bellegarde, je t'invite à te référer au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_pi.C3.A9tonnes_partag.C3.A9es

Pour ce qui est de la voie cyclable que tu as créer, il faut éviter en général de créer une nouvelle voie quelconque qui elle n'est pas séparée par un terre plein, dans ce cas là, le trajet vélo est d'utiliser la voie bus donc sur la voie bus il y a le tag cycleway=shared_busway pour l'indiquer.

J'ai fait la correction.

Si t'as des doutes, regarde bien le wiki et comment c'est fait des les alentours ou ailleurs et sinon tu peux toujours poser des questions au autres contributeurs sur le telegram osm france ou sur les forums, a+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96521099
wclancy09 (2021-01-05 03:30:38+00:00): At the very least, the section between the car park, and the Stag Lodge exit IS one way (check google street view; there are no entry signs by the Stag Lodge gate). I can't recall off the top of my head if there are no entry signs on the western access road prohibiting exit towards cot hill, but at the very least the road layout discourages it, and the no entry at Stag Lodge creates a de-facto one way system.
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-28 09:44:48+00:00): Hi Mick,

Thanks again for your recent additions to the map.

I have to admit that this last change has left me a little confused. I cannot find any listing for a Satanic church, temple or other congregation at this location. What is your source? Are you able to provide more information?

Additionally, I can't find any information that would indicate that this property is anything other than a private residence with no noteable historic or cultural significance. Are you able to provide evidence to the contrary?
pfg21 (2020-12-31 16:43:04+00:00): апередил !! :)
francians (2021-02-02 20:42:40+00:00): Ciao.
Ho fatto revert anche della tua change, immagino legate a quelle di redzonesoftair. Non segnalo il tuo account, ma ti chiedo di contribuire con dati reali..

Buona serata
Francesco
VA00 (2021-02-03 13:24:08+00:00): Nie ma tu przejścia. Płoty w poprzek.
Nordpfeil (2020-12-30 08:02:38+00:00): Hallo  sukhbaatar bolortsetseg!
You mapped a goug of buildings with "barriers fence = yes".
The correct syntax is "barrier = fence".
In this case is not a fence it is a building, where people are living. I put "building = residential". The same for the objects around this one. If you have any question, please ask me.
GerdP (2024-01-07 15:48:36+00:00): Moin!
Warum hast Du hier aus tracktype=grade1 ein tracktype=grade gemacht?
https://www.osm.org/way/175655158
hvalentim (2020-12-28 18:21:41+00:00): Obrigado pelo esforço. Porém, p.f. não use as imagens aéreas Bing na zona da Trafaria. Estão MUITO desalinhadas; ao usá-las está, de facto, inadvertidamente, a piorar o trabalho. Prefira por ex. a ESRI ou, se possível, as Ortofotos Litoral 2014-15 da DGT.
P Rocha (2020-12-28 18:45:35+00:00): Obrigado pela dica e peço desculpa pelo desalinhamento, pois estava criar trilhos novos em falta (sou morador na zona) ao qual achei estranho estarem sobrepostos ao que existia, como era só em alguns pontos pensei que fosse algum erro. Vou ter atenção em não usar o Bing e corrigir em função dos mapas que me aconselhou. Cumprimentos, Pedro Rocha
Kovoschiz (2020-12-28 09:58:10+00:00): The toll booths still exists so it needs to be related to "disused".
🗺🗺🗺 (2020-12-28 13:53:01+00:00): The booths themselves have been removed, only the shelter and lane-separating concretes are left. They are now being gradually dismantled.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96524763
Kovoschiz (2020-12-28 23:11:25+00:00): There are some toll facilities with toll machines only, that has no "booth" buildings.
stefanct (2021-01-03 15:53:50+00:00): Hi WH,
ich habe vor Kurzem die gesamten Ärztenamen in Tirol an das im deutschsprachigen Raum gebräuchliche Namensschema "Dr. Vorname Nachname" umgestellt. Ich weiß, dass die amtlichen Daten dem von dir verwendeten Format entsprechen, aber es wäre super, wenn du bzw. ihr das gemäß den Gepflogenheiten von OSM eintragen könntet, damit das einheitlich ist.
wh_LT (2021-01-04 12:41:22+00:00): Hallo stefanct,
danke für die Info und Umstellung/Korrektur. Zukünftig werden wir uns auch an das Namensformat "Dr. Vorname Nachname" halten.
Schöne Grüße
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-28 16:34:41+00:00): Invalid tag modification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96525547
village (2021-02-03 17:06:20+00:00): hm, ich hätte die geänderten Zeiten am Wochenende als `opening_hours:covid19` eingetragen..(hat ja damit zu tun als Auslöser)
Blackrainbowfountain (2021-02-04 09:51:57+00:00): Ist geändert. Hatte bei Street Complete noch nicht die entsprechende Option entdeckt. Danke
JuaFritz (2021-06-28 12:10:20+00:00): Ciao! I cartelli di inizio e fine centro abitato indicano "Scancio" (quello per chi arriva da Trento ha anche la dicitura "capoluogo del comune di Segonzano"), perché Segonzano è un comune sparso: non esiste un paese chiamato così. A mio avviso indicare su OSM un nucleo abitato inesistente genera solo confusione, con la gente che è convinta di arrivare a "Segonzano" ma non lo trova mai perché il paese si chiama "Scancio". Per le label dei comuni sparsi si usa place=municipality, come è stato fatto correttamente a Giovo, Valfloriana, Lavarone e tutti gli storici comuni sparsi.
moreno96 (2020-12-28 10:17:35+00:00): سلام.
ویرایش های شما کلی مشکل بوجود آورده. مثل خطوط روی هم افتاده.
لطفا اصلاحشون کنید
zorglubu (2020-12-29 22:07:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Vendeur de chaudières, installations solaires de chauffage, etc. ça n'existe pas encore dans OSM. Mais c'est shop=*.
Je classerais les enseignes Richardson plutôt dans un shop=bathroom_furnishing, en attendant plus précis.
Attention, il y a un nœud, PLUS un bâtiment correspondant à Richardson. Je vous suggère de supprimer le nœud. et de ne mettre qu'un 'p' à équipement ;-)
Betanyahoo (2020-12-28 17:22:12+00:00): A hashtag gives other mappers no information on what you've done # https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
literan (2020-12-28 17:49:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8266449474/history#map=19/55.81269/37.61760 тут нет ошибки в названии и типе?

repair это ремонт
solenoid jam (2020-12-28 19:27:24+00:00): Да, ошибка в типе. Название верно. Спасибо. Поставлю заметку.
Bernhard W (2021-01-17 17:06:29+00:00): Landes-Impfzentrum Alzey 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8266460518 nach Besuch: 
Die neue DRK-Fahrzeughalle habe ich eingetragen, Umrisse grob geschätzt (noch kein Luftbild), bitte bei Gelegenheit detaillieren.
Node dorthin verschoben, 
fixme = "Genaue Position unbekannt, soll in der neuen DRK-Fahrzeughalle in der Albiger Straße sein" gelöscht.
tintinmaster (2021-01-18 06:52:20+00:00): 👍️
ndm (2020-12-28 12:25:51+00:00): I've removed the service road you added that seems to be a hedge.
srikmar (2020-12-31 12:07:12+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the road based on the Private Maxar imagery. Apologies, I have missed adding the source. It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improvise our edits. Please let me know if my edits are contradicting with the ground truth and suggest me with the necessary changes if required. Always happy to learn from the community.
PT-53 (2022-03-18 07:11:02+00:00): Hallo MAPissimo,
Du hast den Looser Turm in diesem Änderungssatz als Fläche neu eingzeichnet
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889175796/history
Da dieser zuvor von Dir schon als Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5606763941/history
 eingetragen war, ist er jetzt in OSM doppelt vorhanden, was nicht sein sollte.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Dimacn (2020-12-28 12:29:40+00:00): Зачем вы удалили жилую территорию? Её удалять не надо было. Верните пожалуйста как было.
changchun_1 (2021-01-14 10:35:28+00:00): Hallo Openbikereditor,
gibt es die K 2117 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889176713 
als Landstraße ein zweites mal? 
Eine Landstraße mit so viel Kurven kommt mit komisch vor.
Gruß changchun_1
OpenBikerEditor (2021-01-14 14:18:42+00:00): Hallo changchun_1,
nein die alte bisher recht gerade Straße ist wegen dem neuen Industriegebiet zurückgebaut. 
Die aktuelle Straße ist sehr wild geschwungen.
Vermutlich wird in 1-2 Jahren diese wieder verlegt werden.
Da ich die Straße nur grob via GPS Tracker erfassen konnte wäre es gut wenn da nochmal jemand drüber schauen kann.
Der Fahrradweg neben der alten K2117 fehlt auch noch.
Gruß Openbikereditor
eggie (2020-12-28 11:19:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-28 11:32:29+00:00): Dag   noomen..
Deze tag is de basis. Je zou het kunnen uitbreiden.
Vooral de doelgroepen zijn belangrijk.
bicycle=no ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Mapse,
eggie
Map-Peter (2020-12-28 22:58:39+00:00): Hallo Bin-unterwegs, 
 
wie lange ist der Abschnitt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889181000/history ) voraussichtlich gesperrt?
Bin-unterwegs (2020-12-29 03:16:37+00:00): Die Eisenbahnbrücke wird voraussichtlich erst im 3 Quartal 2021 für den Strassenverkehr freigegeben werden.
Map-Peter (2020-12-29 21:01:00+00:00): Betrifft die Sperrung auch (uneingeschränkt) den Fuß- / Fahrradweg daneben? 
 
Ich habe dazu leider auf die Schnelle nur einen imho etwas widersprchlichen Text gefunden ( https://www.deutschebahn.com/pr-berlin-de/aktuell/presseinformationen/Umweg-fuer-Fussgaenger-und-Radfahrer-in-Neustrelitz-5635814 ). 

Zitat vom Link: 
"[...] Die Deutsche Bahn ersetzt bis Sommer nächsten Jahres die alte Bahnbrücke über die Wesenberger Chaussee durch eine neue. Zusätzlich zum Fahrzeugverkehr müssen vom 23. September bis 19. Oktober auch Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger einen Umweg nehmen [...]" 
 
Verstehe ich das richtig, das die Sperrung des Fuß- / Fahrradweges bereits vorbei ist? Wird der Weg danach durch die Engstelle der Baustelle geführt? (Viel Platz ist da ja nicht.) 
 
Weißt du dazu mehr? 
 
Gruß Peter
Bin-unterwegs (2020-12-30 02:32:15+00:00): Hallo Peter, der Radweg ist derzeit frei. Er wird wohl ab und zu sporadisch gesperrt werden.
Dimacn (2020-12-28 12:27:34+00:00): Пожалуйста верните назад удалённую вами территорию гаражей. Её не надо было удалять.
SHARCRASH (2020-12-28 11:00:43+00:00): + replacement of BCEE Clock Tower node by actual building
VictorIE (2020-12-30 11:44:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/320226836#map=17/54.92837/-7.19628

This is showing as a 'near junction'. Is it still usuable?
LateNightTone (2020-12-31 11:03:33+00:00): Thanks for that VictorIE. I've double checked the video I used to reference this section and see that the road is still signposted from the new road, so yes it's still connected. I must have missed it as the video passed that point. Also added notes/fixmes as there will be changes over the coming months, but not sure of schedule.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.