piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 00:08:46+00:00): Reverting on the sole purpose that it's not a dedicated account is counter productive and a waste of time. I will use a dedicated account as it's the proper way to do things, but reverting good commits is very bad for the osm community.
Nakaner (2016-08-30 13:10:03+00:00): I will revert this an similar changesets in the next hours or days (its just a question of time until the load of the API is low enough). I will revert them mainly due to low quality of the imported data. Just compare it to satellite imagery, logic and Good_Practice at OSM wiki.

I will also revert all changeset which tried to fix this import.
Nakaner (2016-08-30 13:11:09+00:00): Reverts will cover changeset 41761086 to 41786190 and maybe more changesets if I find more changesets with similar issues.
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 13:13:08+00:00): Could you not revert work that is being done?????? I'm forwarding this to the DWG
Nakaner (2016-08-30 13:41:30+00:00): Full explanation of issues of this import (changesets 41761086 to 41786190):

1. The imported data has overlapping, duplicated ways. Way #439632327 (natural=water) has exactly the same nodes as way #439632406 (no tags, inner member of forest multipolygon). Both ways have been uploaded at the same changeset. This issue exists all over the whole import.

2. There are areas which is mapped as natural=wood (multipolygon) which seems to have no trees at all according to Bing. If zoom out, the high-res imagery is replaced by low-res Landsat imagery. High-res is covered by snow while low-res is not covered by snow. The summer imagery shows a dark green only at that areas which are covered by trees on the winter imagery. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.76484/-74.57356

3. A high-voltage power line crosses the area you imported and has already been mapped before. After your import it is still there but it runs next to its cutting through the forest. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Import-Fails-Powerlines-Not-Inside-Cutting.png

4. You uploaded address interpolation line(s) (way #439631732) whose curves are smoother than the sharp corners of the road.

5. The roads you uploaded are not connected with other roads and were uploaded although there have been roads before. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/i6r 

6. I doubt that way #439632682 is really a footway and assume that it is more likely a path. (That's more a tagging issue which can feed a long discussion at a mailing list)
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 13:51:14+00:00): I remind anyone following this that Nakaner has took it uppon himself to revert multiple changesets without prior discussion on the talk-ca or any other medium. He has just left comments like: I'm going to revert this (moments later) Ok it's reverted. Not letting the importers the chance to fix their import
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 13:59:01+00:00): I have downloaded all the data from this import and saved it. If you revert it, it will be reuploaded with fixes. I see that there are problems with the map and I am working on correcting them.
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 14:19:05+00:00): Those powerlines are a result of tracing Bing imagery data(which was not part of this import and done previously), which is highly likely to be off by a few meters, especially in the north. These are things that must be corrected, but again reverting work that's being done is counter-productive and bad for the osm community
Nakaner (2016-08-30 14:29:38+00:00): LogicalViolinist, why didn't you check and improve/adapt the existing data BEFORE you uploaded your import?
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 14:33:19+00:00): I will do so in the future as I was unsure about somethings, but now I'm fixing them and committed to doing this. Most of the errors have to do with multipolygons which I now understand how to properly map thanks to this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples#Forest_with_two_lakes_and_an_island_.28Nested_multipolygons.29
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 14:46:53+00:00): Also the nodes that are not connected in Chibougamau were not even in this region (32J01 - 32J11) and not my prerogative to connect them. I will how ever connect the disconnected roads in my import and then after correct Chibougamau's inner city roads
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 15:24:43+00:00): Also Bing imagery can be stale in the north as much as 15-20 years. It is a good indicator, but totally untrust worthy in Canada's Northern regions. Rule of thumb is if it's not in a highly populated area, the imagery will most likely be out of date.
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 18:08:00+00:00): 32J01 Should be fixed, working on others
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 18:34:04+00:00): 32J02 fixed
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 19:35:01+00:00): 32J03 fixed
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-31 18:02:55+00:00): 75% of it fixed
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:20:30+00:00): Pedestrian routing works well without those extra footways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=56.18349%2C10.19835%3B56.18408%2C10.20669
Rular (2016-08-29 13:29:44+00:00): They work well with graphhopper I see. This seems to be due to a disregard for one direction bike paths (even if you choose routing with bikes). OSRM does not seem to ignore this. I am very open to alternate suggestions on the proper way to address the issue of a pedestrian path branching of from from the main road.
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:35:19+00:00): As far as I can see graphhopper works correctly for bicycles too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=56.18281%2C10.19789%3B56.18434%2C10.20275
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:37:04+00:00): Note that in Denmark both examples are the correct behaviour
Rular (2016-08-29 13:39:24+00:00): Yes, I caught that one as well after closer investigation. (I messed up origin and destination.) I using bike paths against the designated direction for pedestrians expected behavior?
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:40:34+00:00): Yes
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:42:24+00:00): Note that walking against the designated direction is usually safer.
Rular (2016-08-29 13:44:21+00:00): Excellent. Forgive my newbie mistakes. Should I/we roll back changes and perhaps focus on the shortcuts that are actually missing?
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:44:22+00:00): Which is also why pedestrians on roads without sidewalks should always walk on the left side.
Hjart (2016-08-29 13:45:00+00:00): You are welcome to roll back if you know how.
Rular (2016-08-29 13:45:42+00:00): I am well aware of the real world traffic safety etc. Just not aware of the standard interpretation in OSM. :)
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 17:44:15+00:00): This added a portuguese name to a small village in Italy and a personal comment on a store, reverted
highflyer74 (2016-09-05 09:00:26+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall stellt sich die Frage, was mit name=* gemeint ist. Ist das eine Firma o.ä.? Mit dem jetzigen Eintrag ist es etwas nichtssagend.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Für Android gibt es Vespucci. maps.me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
user_5359 (2016-08-29 17:49:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! There exists an post_office on the cemetery? And block 3 is a tourism attraction (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction).

I don’t believe this! Please give uns more information about this cemetery.
bhavyakota (2019-03-01 03:06:31+00:00): Hi diorz38,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the"way 439706102
way 439706069
way 437489319
way 437490085
way 437489095
way 439873222
way 439873224
way 439873222
way 439873214
way 439873217
way 439706040
way 439706042
" classified as 'Residential'..However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, these roads seem to be water ways and are not required to create such roads.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
siripurapu (2019-03-01 04:18:27+00:00): """Hi diorz38,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the node 4353003629 where unclassified is ending on residential. . However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area and also leading to inconsistency in priority.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""
siripurapu (2019-03-06 01:32:08+00:00): Hi 'diorz38',

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437490048 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
uryevich (2016-09-12 15:53:26+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Очень непродуманные правки у Вас получились. Часть удалили без причины, часть исправили на то, чего быть не должно. Дублёр должен быть второстепенной дорогой, это было указано в заметке note, которую Вы проигнорировали. Зачем-то удалили дорогу 335737635 - там проект что-ли переделали? Часть эстакады, отмеченная ранее как строящаяся - 335737669 - она фактически построена, но не введена в эксплуатацию, - её тоже удалили. Может лучше откатить это всё?
TpuPyku (2016-09-13 07:09:48+00:00): Сорьки если что-то не соответствует действительности и легче откатить, откатывайте. Я проблем и не соответствий не вижу все развязки на месте. Классом дороги мог и ошибиться, что есть второстепенная дорога по классификации вики и тегов? Можно ли посмотреть как оно было тоже не нашел.
user_5359 (2016-08-29 17:29:13+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist das tatsächlich noch ein Briefkasten mit Sonntagsleerung?? Bitte auch demnächst ein check_date hinzufügen (siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date)
Владимир К (2016-08-29 14:24:08+00:00): здесь тоже подтащить бар в здание
Laura Covacevich (2017-05-31 13:13:05+00:00): En caso de lluvias es posible que se inunde con facilidad el lugar
zarl (2016-09-15 08:00:14+00:00): Du hast "Stadion" als Namen eingetragen, das ist aber die Funktion. Bitte nur tatsächliche, echte Namen eintragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Attribut

Stadion dürfte hier eh zu hoch gegriffen sein, es dürfte sich um einen Sportplatz handeln, oder?

Könntest du die überflüssigen Bahnen bitte wieder abbauen? Schau doch einfach, wie der Gilchinger Sportplatz jetzt eingetragen ist.

Gruss,
Zarl
btsens (2016-09-15 14:44:40+00:00): Ich weiß leider nicht wie dieser Sportplatz heißt ( ich war nie da, habe nur geeignete Plätze für mein Projekt gesucht bei denen ich eventuell mal testen kann). Er scheint zum TC Seefeld zu gehören? Soll ich den Namen dann lieber ganz raus löschen oder was wäre Dein Namensvorschlag?
Владимир К (2016-08-29 14:23:25+00:00): если киоск, то building=kiosk. и точку магазина кристина не забудь подтащить внутрь киоска
zarl (2016-09-15 08:05:14+00:00): Bitte achte darauf, dass rechteckige Grundflächen von Häusern auch rechteckig eingetragen werden. In iD (deinem Editor im Browser) kannst du einen geschlossenen way anklicken und mit 'S' (für "square") rechteckig machen.

Umrisse in osm für Gebäude sollten auch den Grundflächen am Boden folgen, nicht der (meist überstehenden) Dachkante. In etlichen Fällen kommt es sonst zu nicht gewünschten Überschneidungen mit Strassen und anderen Gebäuden.

Grüsse,
Zarl
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
lilias's garden Rudha Mor (2019-08-31 10:12:11+00:00): HI please could remove this from your map as your data is miss leading people into thinking they can drive on to the property and my son was almost hit by a car for the second time this year. I have already deleted it as a feature on this site but it would be helpful if you remove it to as other app companies are miss using your data and miss representing the walk. Thank you in advance and if your ever back over come and say hello at the house. regards  James
gloda (2019-08-31 12:47:40+00:00): Hi,
A less nuclear option would be for me to correct the representation of the road that goes to the house. If it's okay with you I'll revert the deletion and make the correction.
lilias's garden Rudha Mor (2019-09-01 07:45:35+00:00): If you could keep the walk off the map it would be a great help why we are up dating the path and signs and gates to stop this from happening after all we don't want to stop people enjoying the path but will do if people keep endangering my family life's.

After all this is our back garden and we take care of it so it is there for people to enjoy but if people disrespect it we will make it path part of the scottish garden group closing to tour walks only for a every limited time of year which Im already fighting part of the family who would do this in a hart beat. Please if you could just remove it for the time being I'll be back in contact when everything is in place and safe.
gloda (2019-09-01 15:59:43+00:00): You have already deleted it.
woodpeck (2019-09-01 16:49:08+00:00): See also: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/70578/garden-path
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:39:55+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-08-29 17:43:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Is this a shop=shoes?
Владимир К (2016-08-29 15:03:01+00:00): не нужно писать заглавными всё название
Brian Ristuccia (2016-08-29 15:07:45+00:00): Sorry, the changeset comment is incorrect. This change actually adds the time based right turn restrictions from Lake Street onto  Wilson, Little John, and Homestead streets. I will update when the the do-not-enter signs go up.
mavl (2016-08-31 17:03:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. «Работа» - это не наименование здания.
Vladimir Syroezhkin (2016-09-02 10:36:25+00:00): Что значит bizon41?
MKnight (2016-09-10 13:12:34+00:00): Moin, die Öffnungszeiten mo-fr sind gedoppelt, kannst Du das bitte korrigieren?
DerBer (2016-09-13 19:08:20+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Korrigiert mit #42133623
MKnight (2016-09-13 22:17:16+00:00): thx!
mueschel (2016-09-01 15:23:03+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way:
https://osm.org/way/439756626
It has many strange tags, likely a copy and paste error.
Cheers, Jan
ridixcr (2016-09-12 21:47:22+00:00): Hey there!
You're totally right, and I've already fixed tags on this road. 
Thanks for your feedback!
user_5359 (2016-08-29 17:41:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is there really no connection between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20378297 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20362159 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20387646? You can tag the last node with noexit=yes (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit)
Derick Rethans (2016-08-30 18:53:30+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding things to OpenStreetMap!

Is the Pets at Home that you added really in a garage? Or is that what the building previously was?

cheers,
Derick
bkil (2017-08-19 18:22:36+00:00): I recall this node being here for a while now. Did someone delete it? Does the fast food buffet at ELTE-TOK still exist? If it does not, it should have been set to disused:amenity instead of deleting it. Do you think we should investigate this area for vandalism?
Vincent de Phily (2016-08-30 09:35:18+00:00): I checked the first handful of changes, which are fine, but could you please reduce your changesets to smaller geographical regions, so that tjey are easyer to review by locals ? It'd also make your own pre-upload review safer :)
b108 (2016-09-05 09:31:35+00:00): После вашей правки на линии Анисовой улицы почему-то оказался тег building=yes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35851629/history

И с неё же исчезли теги названий на других языках.

Я уже молчу про другие ошибки, например с пожарными гидрантами.

Почему это произошло?
b108 (2016-09-05 09:44:11+00:00): Почему с карты был удалён этот мусорный контейнер?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3517430311/history
b108 (2016-09-05 09:45:13+00:00): Я полностью откатил пакет правок из-за многочисленных ошибок в нём. Или это нарочно было сделано?
Shinigami (2017-02-09 15:07:07+00:00): Hi!
Just to be sure, is this really part of DR border line?
Goffredo (2016-08-29 22:52:59+00:00): Sicuro che la fontanella si chiami "Miky & Miki House" ?
demon_box (2016-12-02 12:27:00+00:00): dopo 3 mesi (...) rispondo io... tag name errato, lo elimino.
ciao
seattlefyi (2016-08-29 22:11:41+00:00): Wow! I just went and looked at Friday Harbor since I'm thinking of making a trip here soon, and saw all the buildings you drew recently. That's great! One thing I should ask -- do you know about the building square tool in iD? If you draw a square building close to square in the editor, then select one of the edges, a tool palette pops up. One of the tools has a box on it. If you click the box, the selected building's corners should snap to 90 degrees. (Or you can press the 'S' shortcut). It really helps how the buildings look, and is the preferred way to draw buildings! Thanks again for the edits!
kartler175 (2016-09-03 17:30:25+00:00): Warum löschst Du hier die äußeren Member der MP-Relation?
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2416461
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=12.96155&lat=47.77340&zoom=14&opacity=1.00&overlays=role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch
scai (2016-08-31 18:19:08+00:00): Hello. Your changes did break the coastline and also duplicated it at some parts:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439773066
Remember the land is always on the left side of the coastline and water is always on the right side. Can you try to fix it?
joost schouppe (2016-09-30 18:55:18+00:00): Bedankt voor de update! Ik ging het net zelf corrigeren naar aanleiding van analyse op het wegenregister
(zie  www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost schouppe/diary/39250 )
user_5359 (2016-08-29 18:30:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t delete existing driveway. You can add the tag access, if necessary (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access)
chachafish (2018-05-24 11:18:45+00:00): Howdy :) Thanks for your additions to the map. I'm slowly working through some OSM Inspector-tagged errors and came across, for example, 64006 E Hwy 330, 63850 E Hwy 330,  63538 E Hwy 330, and others. I think, "E Hwy" should be, "East Highway" and the road in front of these houses should be labeled as Highway 330? Could you revisit this area? You can see the flagged errors (red dots) at the link below. Cheers! :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-107.88302&lat=39.23908&zoom=12&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
Te-Ika (2018-05-24 15:36:05+00:00): Hey chachafish,
So I took a look at the area in question and found that the road had the tiger base name of "State highway 330." I changed the key from tiger to alt_name and removed the state. From there I also added a road that had the same name as the house addr:street tags that appeared to be along the road based on imagery. I believe those addresses to be accurate because I imported those in from local county GIS database with their permission. I am going to take another look at that database later on today but I am busy right now working on another project. Thanks for your feedback! Let me know if there is anything else I can help with.
rene78 (2016-08-30 08:32:24+00:00): Why have you reverted his changes?
mavl (2016-08-30 09:54:10+00:00): Hello. Data Working Group has a request to revert some changesets. More information http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55504
Владимир К (2016-08-30 07:16:28+00:00): не нужно писать большими буквами
Владимир К (2016-08-30 07:16:53+00:00): и что это? вы ведь не добавили категорию объекта.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Alecs01 (2016-08-29 19:29:30+00:00): Non credo siano rest_area nel senso di OSM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area forse parcheggi, senz'altro da posizionare meglio (questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374563193 dalle foto aeree si vede sopra un edificio, anche il nome sembra strano), puoi pensarci tu? magari con una nota (o da openstreetmap.org, che è senz'altro meglio)
Goffredo (2016-08-29 22:56:40+00:00): Scrivo qui riguardo pure alla altre due rest_area: Dalle foto aeree non c'è nessuna rest area qui (figurarsene tre), ed il nome name:it=italiano che senso ha? in name ci va il nome (proprio) dell'oggetto! (ad esempio, se taggo una fontanella, è sbagliato mettere name=fontana. E' invece corretto mettere il nome se la fontana ne ha uno, ad esempio name=Fontana di Trevi)
Владимир К (2016-08-30 05:50:07+00:00): А я всё же предлагаю почитать для начала документацию вот здесь http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C#.D0.9C.D0.B0.D0.B3.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B8.D0.BD . и не лепить вот такого вот мусора

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4371572811
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439775785

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374594426 - пересечение воображаемого гаража и лэп. Вы портите данные.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 05:59:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439059344/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
asciipip (2024-04-12 14:15:23+00:00): At the time I made this, it seemed there was a growing use of waterway=brook for natural waterways that were smaller than a stream. I was using it as the non-man-made alternative to waterway=ditch.

Since then, it seems that tagging has coalesced around waterway=stream + intermittent=yes for waterways like these. (And I see you wrote about deprecating waterway=brook on the tagging list in 2020.)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-24 12:17:22+00:00): Do you think that retagging it into waterway=stream + intermittent=yes (or maybe waterway=ditch or other tagging) would be a good idea?
asciipip (2024-04-25 14:03:31+00:00): My understanding of waterway=ditch is that it carries connotations of manmade waterways, so I don't think it's appropriate. Probably waterway=stream + intermittent=yes would be the better-supported alternative tagging.