piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2018-03-11 21:10:11+00:00): Hi again,
Just thought I'd offer some imagery alignment tips as here you added some buildings I saw were rather far offset from the ESRI background I chose to explore the area.
Here in the golf course you added a car park next to a building.  You used Bing satellite imagery (not sure why it's called aerial here) which I see to give that building some 9,9 metres offset from its position in ESRI Community aerials (up to zoomlevel 19, Bing satellite is overzoomed  from 17 or so).
Another, much older source for reference, is what used to be Bing aerial imageries, now archived as the ESRI Clarity or here as the Mapbox layer.  This shows about 8,5m offset in the same direction.
There are also NYS Orthos my editor does not support, and low-resolution USGS imagery that is also usually well aligned.  The latter gives some 8m (plus or minus a bit) again in the same direction.
DigitalGlobe Premium matches your Bing up to zoomlevel 19, then at z20 appears to have a pixely overzoom of archive Bing.  DG supplies the satellite imagery used by Bing here.
DG Standard offers a winter satellite view of the area with snow and few leaves and hazy air, here I measure it again as 9,9 metres offset in the same direction as the others.
As far as age, the archive ESRI colourful imagery is missing the building and driveway loop just southwest of the golf course, as it's probably nearing ten years old.
I haven't studied the others for missing details, but I'd personally use the ESRI aerial imageries that align well with the roads, and make all your further edits to that.
And if you feel like it, shift the items you've added to match their positions there.
Alternatively, trace something from that and align your Bing imagery to that.  But the ESRI imagery is so much clearer that I'd just use that by default.
Note too that the satellite imageries I've investigated have a varying offset depending on hills and the like, that most aerial imageries try to correct.  Ten metres is pretty extreme though, I will have to compare in town.
Sometime you may see much sharper and newer Mapbox imagery as is available in other parts of the country, which will be much easier to work with.
.
Hope these tips help, as I see you are already doing a lot of mapping and I'd rather you do the best possible from the start.
tl;dr - Sorry for the length of this explanation.
rrkramer1 (2018-03-12 03:45:21+00:00): Thanks for the tips.
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-05-28 06:45:32+00:00): Hi Coco, hope you are doing great. I would like to ask what kind of this long way without any tag? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/568624660

Thank you and happy mapping!
nevw (2021-05-28 08:00:31+00:00): Excuse me for jumping in...
When viewed using Esri imagery the water level was low and in the left side of the untagged line you can see an old track that follows the line but is now submerged for the rest of the way.
Coco will enlighten us :)
Coco (2021-05-28 12:53:48+00:00): Hello Fanny IRM-ED and nevw,
Thanks for pointing out the untagged way, and for your questions.
The untagged way, and another one a little further north, is a vehicle track, like many others around the lake.  I simply forgot to tag them.  Both are now tagged and the tags uploaded.
The ESRI imagery shows the lake at about 60% capacity.  The lake is a municipal reservoir.  The local water authority pump from the lake all year round, and in dry years, down to 32% capacity, after which they then pump from Lake Julius, about 90km away. 
The reason the tracks traverse the bottom of the lake is simple.   The lake bed has a very low slope, and when the lake is pumped down towards it's lowest level, the area of the water shrinks considerably, the exposed lake bed drys out, and the tracks appear and are well used until the wet season, if there is sufficient rainfall to fill the lake again.
I've mapped the shoreline to what I estimate is the 80% mark, as that seems to be the most common level, until it is pumped down again.
I hope this makes sense.
Cheers,
Coco
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-06-21 03:53:33+00:00): thank you for the explaining coco, I think I get what happens in the location
Happy Mapping!

Cheers :)
SomeoneElse (2018-03-11 11:28:22+00:00): Hello Ant Ko,
Can you explain the source of the data used here?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_6750990 (2018-03-18 12:04:59+00:00): The source of this data should be my brain, and hopefully, in the Kawthaung Development Committee's plans...
SomeoneElse (2018-03-18 12:46:33+00:00): How did the information get into your brain?  Did you read if from somewhere else?  If so, where?
nlehuby (2018-05-16 09:11:54+00:00): Bonjour,
es-tu certain qu'il y a un théatre ici ? Et qu'il s'appelle Opéra Garnier ? cela me semble peu probable...
Alex38210 (2018-05-17 11:15:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis surpris, je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir positionné cette information.
Comment supprimer cet élément ?
Merci
nlehuby (2018-05-18 11:28:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour supprimer un élément dans l'application Maps.me, il faut cliquer sur "Modifier le lieu", puis sur "la place n'existe pas" tout en bas du formulaire.
Alex38210 (2018-05-27 17:26:08+00:00): Bonjour,
j'espère avoir fait le nécessaire correctement.
Peux tu me le confirmer stp.
Merci
nlehuby (2018-05-29 06:16:54+00:00): Bonjour,
ce n'est pas tout à fait bon : tu as supprimé les informations sur le lieu (les tags) mais pas le point lui-même. Tu peux le faire avec la touche "Suppr" quand le point est sélectionné.
Alex38210 (2018-05-29 15:48:01+00:00): Bonjour,
j'espère cette fois ci avoir fait tout correctement.
Merci
nlehuby (2018-05-29 15:54:54+00:00): Oui :) bien joué 👍
eggie (2018-03-11 10:57:59+00:00): Dag Etienne, De Multi heb ik hier hersteld. Volgens mij zat de poel als relatie in dat sportveld aan de overkant, maar die hoort dus bij het grasveld waar die zelf in ligt. De sportvelden heb ik ook weer in een Multi gezet.
Met editor JOSM haal ik zulke "fouten" eruit.
margin-auto (2018-03-11 08:00:47+00:00): IGN hat natürlich als Quelle hiermit nichts zu tun. Typo. :-|
Constable (2018-03-11 14:31:54+00:00): ok ma che orari fa il sabato pomeriggio? il tag note serve solo a indicare qualcosa agli altri mappatori, non serve ad integrare le informazioni fornite con altri tag.
Constable (2018-03-12 08:03:50+00:00): ho visto che hai rimosso il tag note, grazie per la collaborazione!
Ciao, buon lavoro!
highflyer74 (2018-03-12 06:41:29+00:00): Moin rosinenbrot!

In diesem Änderungssatz wurde von Dir ein Hotel hinzugefügt. Ein paar Anmerkungen habe ich dazu:

- heisst das Hotel wirklich genau, wie die Straße?

- liegt das Hotel auf der Straße?

- wird der Hotelname mit einem kleinen "s" vorn geschrieben?

Sei so nett, Dich kurz hier im Changeset zu melden, damit wir die Lage gemeinsam klären können. Danke!

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen wie z.B. falsch positionierten Objekten kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits).

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!
Evandering (2018-04-26 00:35:43+00:00): Hi JJIglesias,

May I ask why these ways were upgraded to trunk? [Bolivia clasificación_de_carreteras](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Bolivia/Clasificaci%C3%B3n_de_carreteras) says that trunk roads are those which connect large cities, but these towns seem very small compared to the largest cities in Bolivia, and F35 doesn't seem comparable to a road like F4. Perhaps secondary or tertiary would be a more appropriate classification?

Regards,

Evandering
JJIglesias (2018-04-26 04:01:30+00:00): Hi Evandering. These ways were catalogued as trunk roads because all belongs to the Offical Road Network Systems (Red Vial Fundamental) of Bolivia (That's why the F numbering). They are under the control of the federal goverment and should be eventually improved by paving all of them and even made a two separated ways roads. In this case they are not physiscally "trunk" roads as such but, legally they are. 
So the local comunity agree to place them as trunk roads whatsoever the quality of the road as such.
Hope this clarify, Best Regards JJ
chnav (2018-03-12 06:55:11+00:00): Удаления в правке проверены. Всё корректно, строится новый микрорайон.
Vassiliy Lion (2018-03-12 07:15:25+00:00): Да, строится, я живу неподалеку, буду следить за постройками
welzheimerwald (2023-08-21 16:38:24+00:00): Hallo Geofreund,
gehört ein Gemeindeteil wie der Weiler Bärenbach in der Gemeinde Urbach nicht zum selben Postleitzahlenbezirk (73660) wie der Hauptort der Gemeinde, sondern zu einem benachbarten Postleitzahlenbezirk (73655), findet nicht automatisch eine Umgemeindung statt. Die Zuweisung  "Gemeinde=Plüderhausen" ist daher falsch. Eine richtige Adressangabe wäre in dem Fall "Bärenbach 2, 73655 Urbach", da von der Einteilung der Postzustellbezirke die politische Verwaltungszugehörigkeit unberührt bleibt. Und falls es heißt "Aber das Navi checkt das nicht!!!" - Das ist dann ein Problem des Navigationsgeräteherstellers.
Владимир К (2018-03-14 12:20:13+00:00): Hello!

Could you explain the meaning of this object https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5311921 ?
Heinz_V (2018-03-14 12:37:39+00:00): This relation contains aeras, where the BING images are only with low resolution. Areas can be deleted, if there are now high resolution images.
Владимир К (2018-03-14 13:08:43+00:00): Is it really important to know? Is someone uses this information for something? I mean now we have lots of imagary: esri, mapbox, MigitalGlobe Premium and Standart.
Heinz_V (2018-03-14 13:16:21+00:00): It's really without importance. I deleted all portions in India and Nepal.
maraf24 (2018-03-12 23:23:16+00:00): Twierdzisz więc, że szkołę zamknięto, a w jej miejsce utworzono park o nazwie Zespół Szkół?
maraf24 (2018-03-12 23:56:47+00:00): Nie jest to park.
GinaroZ (2018-03-12 14:56:46+00:00): Hi. If https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/721590102 is closed then it is best to remove the node from the map
eggie (2018-03-11 10:08:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
highflyer74 (2018-03-13 08:45:24+00:00): Hi Dave!

Can you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568646627 please? There are still some non-OSM tags on it.

Greetings from across the pond!
AlaskaDave (2018-03-13 14:02:57+00:00): Got it, extra tags removed. Thanks!
BCNorwich (2018-03-11 10:24:27+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
unfortunately your construction area is un-tagged and one section doesn't encircle an area. It thus serves no purpose.
There's no Costa shop where you've placed the POI but the is one on the High Street somewhere.
Could you please rectify these problems? If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
eggie (2018-03-11 10:12:55+00:00): Peter,.. hier zou ik gewoon een parking van maken. Dus één vlak.. Doe je dat zelf?
Josef73 (2018-10-31 19:14:34+00:00): Hello, is the reastaurant opend on Monday or closed?
Arturo Marconi (2018-11-01 06:06:06+00:00): Chiama questo numero on Italia
0522828549
streckenkundler (2018-03-11 10:21:26+00:00): Hei,

setze mal bitte für "Höhe" und "Am Sandberg" zusätzlich ein place=locality

Dann wird das auch ausgewertet und angezeigt. Das betrifft auch andere Changesets. 

Grüße,

Sven
Gerhard1199 (2018-03-23 12:44:27+00:00): Ist jetzt ok
Jazzzz (2018-04-04 14:07:55+00:00): Hi,
It seems like you added a tertiary road that is a little strange:

- it overlaps an existing secondary road
- it is made of 2 one-way roads a few centimeters away from each other that cross at one point

Can you take a look and try to fix this?
Thanks.
JesseMerriam (2018-04-09 23:52:13+00:00): This parking no longer exists.  It has been dug up and is current a building under construction.  I removed it when I ceased to exist.
SomeoneElse (2018-05-31 09:01:01+00:00): Hello Ludmila,
Are you going to fix the problem here or do you need someone else's help?
Best Regards,
Andy
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-06 14:14:54+00:00): What you meant by surface=2 at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568654432/history ?
Jan Westerhof (2018-03-11 12:30:40+00:00): Als de gebouwen zijn opgeleverd, moet dan de straat Uitgouw niet van 'construction' af?
Richard L (2018-03-11 10:18:52+00:00): Wrong comment (JOSM bug?) Should have been: Add details around Stannum/Gråbo source: Esri World Imagery (Clarity), NVDB tiles
eggie (2018-03-11 10:15:38+00:00): Je kunt de inritsjes van de parking taggen als highway=service
service=parking_aisle 
Van de parkeeredits maak je gewoon één vlak. Dus niet alleen waar de auto's staan. Graag reactie.
sergeybe (2018-03-11 12:27:43+00:00): Точку удалил. Ошибки в тегах.
Nakaner (2018-03-11 15:35:48+00:00): Hallo Admin FFKall,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ein Feuerwehrgerätehaus ist kein Park. Ich habe das soeben korrigiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
atcomapper (2018-03-11 13:58:51+00:00): Du bør ikke bruge maxspeed=30 når der er tale om en anbefalet max-hastighed (altså en firkantet tavle, blå baggrund, hvid tekst). Her skal i stedet bruges maxspeed=50 i kombination med maxspeed:advisory=30. Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory
Lytter1 (2018-03-11 19:31:18+00:00): Tak for hjælpen, jeg vil minde om at der er mange af disse fejl rundt omkring på Fyn lavet af forskellige brugere, så der vil være en del rettelser at lave.
eggie (2018-03-11 10:42:39+00:00): Peter.. in het begin volgen we de edits van startende mappers... ook om te helpen.. Probeer svp te reageren, want niet alles gaat goed. 
Op highway=cycleway svp geen foot=yes taggen. 
Haal je het weer weg?
Probeer eerst je "fouten" te herstellen bij zo'n parkeerplaats voordat je verder gaat.
eggie (2018-03-11 11:27:19+00:00): foot=yes heb ik verwijderd. Er kunnen nog wel andere aanvullende tags op.
Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
tux67 (2018-03-12 10:17:27+00:00): Weisst du wo die Zufahrt ist? Für's Routing wäre eine Verbindung zur Straße noch nett.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57077306
user_3716049 (2018-04-15 20:57:49+00:00): Wie auf dem Satbild von Esri-World zu sehen ist die  Kundenzufahrt oben links vor dem Gebäude und die Lieferantenzufahrt unten links an der Bahnstr. 168
tux67 (2018-04-16 05:48:05+00:00): ok, irgenwie sieht das alles aus, wie auf dem alten Praktiker Gelände. 
Jedenfalls hab' ich den Parkplatz jetzt an alter Stelle an die Aachener Straße angeschlossen und gegenüber der Bahnstraße 155 war (und ist immer noch zu sehen) auch eine Einfahrt.
Parkplatz Wege müsste man noch mal später kontrollieren, Es sei denn das Bild ist alt, die Wege hätten sich aber nicht geändert. Der Parkplatz ist jetzt eine Fläche statt einer Linie.
tux67 (2018-04-16 05:54:22+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag ... der Stand der Esri World Images schein der gleiche wie der der Stadt MG von 2016 (also alt?).
https://geoportal.moenchengladbach.de/geo/resources/apps/Luftbild_historisch/index.html?lang=de
user_3716049 (2018-04-23 16:34:54+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis
Hab's nochmal überprüft. Leider ist mir hier ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die eigenltich für Ende 2015 vorgesehen Eröffnung (siehe Quelle), standen die Grünen und Anwohnerklagen entgegen. So das erst im Aug. 2016 abgerissen und Anfang diesen Jahres mit dem Bau begonnen wurde.
http://www.rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/moenchengladbach/riesenbaustelle-fuer-kaufland-in-holt-aid-1.7444255
Hab alles wieder aus der Karte entfernt. Parkplätze künftig inTiefgarage.

Sorry !!! Kelso
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-08 11:00:53+00:00): Note that you added species as trees as their names.

Species of tree goes into more specific tags like species or species:pt
hvalentim (2022-02-08 16:00:14+00:00): Should you inspect the nodes, you will notice the following info was carefully added:
genus
species
species:pt
leaf_cycle
leaf_type
wikipedia
etc...
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-09 09:02:16+00:00): I have seen it, but wikipedia tag and name tags were used incorrectly.

Both should be used only if specifically this tree is named or has a wikipedia page, not for wikipedia page/name of tree species
hvalentim (2022-02-09 18:25:35+00:00): Thanks a lot. I am glad you appreciated all the work that went into it.
demon_box (2018-03-11 18:20:16+00:00): hai dimenticato di mettere landuse=meadow come inner del multipoligono forest....
CAI Salò (2018-03-11 18:23:18+00:00): più che altro è un prato abbandonato...
demon_box (2018-03-11 18:24:41+00:00): allora ci va natural=scrub
Tim Couwelier (2018-03-15 09:25:55+00:00): Gilles,

Vooreerst: blij dat je wil helpen. Helaas heb ik toch een paar bemerkingen bij je edits:
- Je gebouwen lijken niet te kloppen met de onderliggende orthofoto
- Je gebouwen liggen ook deels buiten de getekende 'schoolcampus' wat niet de bedoeling is.
- Ze zijn ook niet netjes 'rechthoekig' gemaakt, zoals je normaal in de introductie wel te zien krijgt...

Een beetje te snel door willen gaan?
Doe je zelf een poging om alles even netjes uit te lijnen?

Bij vragen mag je me gerust een privé-bericht sturen, of even langskomen in onze chatroom (https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org) of op onze fora (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=29)
Gillesh2089 (2018-03-17 18:09:18+00:00): Ik zie niet in waar de lijnen niet rechthoekig zijn, en waar de lijnen niet kloppen met het domein van de school?
Tim Couwelier (2018-03-19 06:59:03+00:00): Selecteer o.a. even het 'Don Bosco Halle A-gebouw uit je changeset (in 'bewerken'), en druk even op 'S' op je toetsenbord. Je zal het verschil wel zien. 

Die andere moet ik even kijken waar die weer zat..
Tim Couwelier (2018-03-19 07:01:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398815360

Die moet niet benoemd worden (want ligt in het vlak 'amenity = school', die een een schoolcampus aanduidt en daar al zn naam heeft. Je schoolgebouw overlapt met die ingetekende campusgrens ook, dus ofwel moet die campusgrens bijgewerkt worden, ofwel staat het gebouw fout. (ook hier is de vorm twijfelachtig, zie eerdere opmerking)
Athalis (2018-03-11 11:48:34+00:00): Positionen waren mit Hilfe von Esri Clarity
user_5359 (2018-03-11 17:40:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
OSchlüter (2018-03-11 11:37:37+00:00): Der Änderungssatzkommentar ist falsch
Er sollte lauten
Mittelspannungleitungen in Hohenfelde unter die Erde verlegt, Masten und Leitungen abgebaut
Alexander-II (2018-03-11 14:13:50+00:00): Зачем вы поменяли формат адреса на неверный? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/109067902  
На территории России действует соглашение о написании номеров домов https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2018-03-11 14:22:50+00:00): Благодарю за замечание; это не украинский вариант. Сейчас исправлю.
mueschel (2018-03-12 09:27:09+00:00): Hi Arman,
could you explain the meaning of the key "field paper = H1"? This looks like it shouldn't be there.
And: do these buildings really have a number as name? This would imply that local people will know which building you're talking about like in "I'm going to house 05".

Cheers, Jan
Arman Sakif (2018-03-13 15:29:10+00:00): Hi Mueschel,
The field paper number and the house number are temporary for our project work. I will update the full database of every house. I put the temporary house number because it will help me to find the house later. I will update this in few days. thanks for your comment.
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-11 14:34:00+00:00): Hi IllicitWallace, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways which are still visible in the used imagery? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57079046
IllicitWallace (2018-03-12 12:13:23+00:00): Good evening. I understand why you might be concerned. This is my neighborhood, and these buildings have been demolished for apartments which are expected to be built in the next 18 months.
Viajero Perdido (2018-03-15 04:14:47+00:00): If you come across a situation like this again, you might like to mark the area as landuse=construction.  That would make the intent more clear.
Happy mapping.  :)
IllicitWallace (2018-03-15 12:25:38+00:00): Oh~ sure thing. I appreciate the advice. Sorry for the confusion ^^
Dino Michelini (2018-12-19 12:37:50+00:00): Ciao, nel mappare il "Selvaggio Blu" stai usando impropriamente alcuni tag. Ad es. nei sentieri utilizzi name=(n)° tappa "Trekking Selvaggio Blu" mentre dovresti creare una relazione superroute-hiking con name=Selvaggio Blu e per ogni singola tappa delle route-hiking; il nome dei singoli sentieri va messo solo se lo si conosce (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking). Puoi trovare un riferimento nel GTS https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9102768.
Andrea Del Sarto (2018-12-20 13:16:46+00:00): ciao,
mi sono limitato a creare la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8101174, unendo i vari sentieri già presenti senza fare modifiche agli stessi.
tra l'altro noto che è stata modificata togliendo il tag name=Selvaggio Blu.
per il discorso tappe nella fonte che avevo non erano suddivise quindi non ho potuto separarle.
mi attiverò per avere info aggiuntive e aggiornerò quanto prima, sempre che tu ne abbia e voglia procedere alla modifica.
grazie per la segnalazione
Carto'Cité (2018-03-11 15:07:12+00:00): Ben Christian, c'est quoi ces nodes sans tag : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/wTG ?
user_5359 (2018-03-11 17:34:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Exists these time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
atcomapper (2018-03-11 13:08:12+00:00): Not sure what the reason of this edit is. The currect emergency location number is C096 (including the leading zero). However, I don't think this should be tagged on the way at all, since there is a separate emergency access point node.
Hjart (2018-03-11 15:59:45+00:00): Jeg er heller ikke helt sikker på at det her er helt korrekt. Bemærk dog at der er masser af stier hele vejen op og ned af vestkysten, der er tagget på lignende måde: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/wTM
blaubarschbube_2 (2018-03-11 16:56:36+00:00): I took a photo of the green sign “C 96“ right before the house Badevej 20A, directly opposite of “Turist Grillen“ and “Blå Kors“ building. You can see it also in Street View.
Hjart (2018-03-11 17:11:01+00:00): German tourists just may not be entirely familiar with what "C96" actually means. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8F-G4HXpF9f9U2BQ4e7FrA appears to be what it what it refers to.