piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DoKimbDeSun (2022-09-04 15:48:01+00:00): servus, danke für die Mithilfe! Ein Fehler hat sich eingeschlichen, die ganze alte Wiestalstraße ist als Brücke dargestellt - ich habs wieder zurückgeändert
LG!
cxTeppic (2022-09-09 07:36:50+00:00): Hi, super vielen Dank.
Das ist leider beim Verbinden der Straße passiert. Danke noch einmal.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Tilia_J (2022-09-02 15:14:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,

Tilia ,

Namens de OSM Community
orthocircular (2022-09-01 23:13:35+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM! I've edited your business entry to have more standardized tag usage and sound less spammy. It's very common for businesses to add themselves to the map with as much information as possible, but we like to keep it short and sweet: even the Grand Canyon doesn't have a description or image tag!

Thanks again and if you would like to contribute more, one good way can be to make sure that people can get good driving directions to your location. As you know, GPS apps often tell people to drive very creatively in rural areas and nobody knows your area better than you! Popular OSM GPS apps are Organic Maps and OsmAnd, but you can check driving directions on openstreetmap.com as well.

Cheers and thanks again!
Allison P (2022-09-02 02:09:41+00:00): "payment:debt" looks like a typo, maybe debit?
orthocircular (2022-09-02 05:30:13+00:00): Good catch, fixed
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:14:48+00:00): Hi Wassermücke55, 

danke für deine Änderungsideen. Mit deinen umgesetzten Änderungen hast du neue Straßen über die bestehenden Straßen gemalt. D.h. an jeder dieser Stellen existiert jetzt die Straße zweimal, direkt übereinander gelegt. Damit wirkt deinen gewollte Änderung nicht, die Geschwindigkeiten anzupassen. Das alte Geschwindigkeitslimit ist noch da und dein neues eben auch. 

Um die Geschwindigkeitsregelungen umzusetzen, müssen die bestehen Straßen bearbeitet werden ohne neue Straßen anzulegen oder über bestehende rüberzumalen.

Aus diesem Grund habe ich deine Änderungssätze rückgängig gemacht. Die Informationen daraus werde ich auf die bestehenden Straßen anwenden.

Es ist auch nicht nötig, jeden Änderungssatzkommentar mit einem Ausrufezeichen abzuschließen. 

Viele Grüße
Sven
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:15:02+00:00): Revert ist erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125663109
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:20:51+00:00): Rügendamm korrigiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125663322
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:28:22+00:00): Die Feldstraße war bereits richtig kartiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27523700

Schau mal, ob deine Navidaten aktuell sind bzw. auf welchem Stand die sind.
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:31:53+00:00): Werftstraße habe ich angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125663693
Strubbl (2022-09-01 16:35:25+00:00): Die B96 Richtung A20 habe ich angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125663805
Dani CS (2022-09-01 10:39:46+00:00): Bonjour ! Quelle est la source de ces bâtiments ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125649230
Geo-Tobi (2024-05-12 05:50:15+00:00): Hier wurde der Highway auf Footway geändert, aber bicycle=designated wurde stehen gelassen. Eine solche Kombination ist aus meiner Sicht ungültig. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54200304
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 03:53:07+00:00): Why did you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4496529612/history and add it again? you should've just moved it, you deleted it and made a new one to make 'name' in Kurdish instead of Arabic?
ovruni (2022-09-01 20:03:02+00:00): Hola KatheryneLorenna, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han cambiando varias clasificaciones de lugares sin motivo aparente, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios. Puede ver las convenciones que usamos en Perú en la wiki. [0] Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA/Caracter%C3%ADsticas_cartogr%C3%A1ficas
Frans S (2022-09-13 15:21:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).s



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125650620
UPegasus (2022-09-05 09:34:04+00:00): Що це за вандалізм, жодного будинку з прямими кутами? Припиніть псувати чужу роботу!
Hufkratzer (2022-09-02 07:43:56+00:00): Hi, you have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31898888 and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding. This object looks like a building in the aerial view, therefore I assume it was not intended to remove the building tag. Furthwemore, the horse_riding tag is for the whole area of the facility and not for just one building, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding. If this building is a riding hall / indoor arena consider using tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall instead.
AndersAndersson (2022-09-01 15:23:43+00:00): Hej!
Undvik att koppla ihop vägarna med byggnader om det inte är så att man kan åka in i byggnaden med bilen. Som exempelvis en tvätthall.
PT-53 (2022-10-28 09:56:46+00:00): Hallo tuxerator,
ist diese Straße
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154782767/history
zwischenzeitlich wieder freigegeben? Dann könnte die Sperrung in OSM ja wieder gelöscht werden.
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
tuxerator (2022-10-28 11:43:52+00:00): Ja kann gelöscht werden. Sollte allerdings eh nicht mehr aktiv sein, da es ein conditional ist welches nur für den Zeitraum der Sperrung aktiv war.
PT-53 (2022-10-28 12:07:46+00:00): Kann gelöscht werden > machst Du das ?
tuxerator (2022-10-28 13:06:34+00:00): Jo.
rskedgell (2023-01-29 22:44:44+00:00): More unjustified changes of cycleway->footway. Not a good look if you're working on a VI accessibility project to sabotage cycle accessibility and routing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125652546
martinst (2022-09-01 20:05:05+00:00): Bei "Baiuvaren-Dorf Sindlovesdorf" ist dir ein Schreibfehler unterlaufen.
riiga (2022-09-01 15:08:54+00:00): Är du säker på att detta är rätt? Det ser ut som att du har ritat in tillfälliga vägar som användes när det byggdes om i området.
riiga (2022-09-01 15:10:58+00:00): Fast du verkar ha ändrat tillbaka en del såg jag nu.
riiga (2022-09-01 15:21:03+00:00): Jag har rullat tillbaka ändringarna helt då det som fanns innan var mer korrekt, förutom där du ritade in hus som inte redan fanns, dessa behöll jag.
aleno150 (2022-09-01 16:16:57+00:00): Ok tack. Jo jag blev lite lurad av satelitbilderna från 2019 och gjorde några misstag. Jag kan dubbelkolla om några detaljer som trappan från bussplattformen upp till bron kom med. Tack för hjälpen.
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 08:36:03+00:00): Ciao,
una corsia ciclabile non è fisicamente separata dalla strada, pertanto non va disegnato un segmento a sè stante ma va semplicemente aggiunto il tag cycleway:both=lane o cycleway:right=lane al segmento esistente della strada.
Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap.
A presto,

Alessandro
gscholz (2023-11-10 09:41:28+00:00): Hi Alessandro,
thanks for your feedback, but this would have better been added to this changeset here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93000607#map=16/45.4879/12.2055

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93000607

Kind regards
Guido
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 10:47:36+00:00): Thank you!
bxl-forever (2022-09-01 14:50:31+00:00): Hello,

"11 bus 1" is invalid.
Please use addr:housenumber=11 and addr:unit=1 instead.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-01 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
chnav (2023-09-11 07:57:36+00:00): Позвольте спросить зачем вы разделили название Р-43 на два ключа. Такие вещи не делаются без тщательного обсуждения. Приведите нормативный документ, где у трассы есть название "43". Боюсь за вами придется всё возвращать обратно.
chnav (2023-09-11 08:01:32+00:00): Правка откачена. Я смотрю вы весь Казахстан покромсали. Повод обратиться в DWG на откат ваших правок.
chnav (2023-09-11 08:02:53+00:00): Стоит оставить карту на некоторое время как начинается отсебятина и самодеятельность. Я очень расстроен, рисуешь карту, изучаешь нормативные документы - потом приходит любитель и кроит всё по своему вкусу. Получается не карта, а помойка.
evgeniyakz (2023-10-28 13:06:06+00:00): А куда Р-43 приатачить ?
На Яндексе проще там в одну трассу входит куча мелких дорог и улиц.
Frans S (2022-09-17 11:38:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building and squared.
Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125656516
Strubbl (2022-09-01 18:59:59+00:00): Hi kabc, haben sich auch die Öffnungszeiten und Kontaktdaten geändert oder wirklich nur der Name? Weißt du das zufällig?
BCNorwich (2022-09-02 07:09:41+00:00): Hi, This section of track duplicates the existing highway, thus I've removed it.

I notice that you've made several of this type of duplication recently. I think I've removed all of them. Please be careful not to keep repeatedly making duplications.

Regards Bernard.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-09-01 15:09:29+00:00): 朋友您好，请使用有意义的变更集注释，仅仅一个“1”不能帮助其他人了解您做出了什么编辑。

此外，您使用的自定义底图可能不符合OSM对版权的要求
Firefishy (2022-09-04 00:23:57+00:00): Awesome Improvement. Thank you. OpenStreetMap is widely used and this is a great improvement.
julcnx (2022-09-02 09:06:10+00:00): Hi ravali_78, when using the revert tool, could you please always include a reference to the original changeset number + an explanation on why the revert was needed? much appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125657468
ravali_78 (2022-09-05 07:37:55+00:00): Hi cmoffroad, Thank you for your suggestions, I should mention the changeset id. Previous changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125656689. I have reverted my changes as I found from Maxar Imagery that the area might be still under construction.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 18:07:48+00:00): what you meant by surface=s at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509314998/history ?

previously it was surface=asphalt
tux67 (2022-09-02 06:43:42+00:00): Hi axaxax,

nur die PLZ zu einem POI hinzuzufügen, ist nicht so sinnvoll. 
Wenn, dann am besten die ganze Adresse.

Gruß
tux67
axaxax (2022-09-12 09:17:21+00:00): Hallo tux67,
sorry, das war ein Versehen. Wahrscheinlich habe ich die PLZ zuerst gespeichert, und beim Nachtragen der Adresse dann nicht mehr. 
Danke für den Hinweis :)
lg ax
gscholz (2022-09-03 05:47:43+00:00): Hi Kiko 2006,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-8.51511&lat=41.22279&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125658064

Can you please fix this?

Obviously the error is caused by way 1089894585 which seems to mean a bus route:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089894585

Public transport routes are edited as relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Public_transport_routes

Can you please change this transport line according to the wiki regulations?
Kind regards
Guido
mapper377 (2022-09-01 14:07:34+00:00): The changeset tag for source should have also included Mapbox imagery.
mapper377 (2022-09-01 15:50:22+00:00): The name "Modadore Road" should be spelled "Mogadore Road".
%20Bunny (2022-09-19 10:59:38+00:00): Thanks for doing this update.
ovruni (2022-09-01 19:50:38+00:00): Hola KatheryneLorenna, el uso de la etiqueta leisure=park [0] se encuentra destinada para ser usada en áreas, no en nodos. Estas áreas ya fueron mapeadas. Por otra parte, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre solamente debe de agregarse a los objetos que tengan un nombre en particular, no para descripciones [1], como es el caso de "Plazuela" o "Parqueo". Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 05:50:06+00:00): Please use a good changeset comment next time.       
You just put the name of the feature you edited in a non local language or known language mappers would understand in this area.       
A good changeset comment would be "Added name:fa=مسجد کوفه" so the mappers know what your edit is.          
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125658500
ovruni (2022-09-01 19:59:22+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta para los estacionamientos es "amenity=parking" [0] y los nombres solamente deben de agregarse cuando existe un nombre particular, no una descripción como "Parqueo" [1]. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dparking
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
jcr83 (2022-09-01 15:51:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous venez d'ajouter "motor_vehicle=no" sur cette piste :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378641257

Est-ce correct ? L'ONF n'a pas le droit de l'emprunter ?
*abq* (2022-09-01 17:16:14+00:00): Presumably, the forest service has the right, but as far as I remember from this morning, it was not indicated at the signs at either side of the road.
Regards, Reiner
jcr83 (2022-09-01 17:45:11+00:00): Thanks for your answer. And sorry, I wrote my message in French, as I didn't know you are probably from Germany.
Jean-Claude
*abq* (2022-09-02 09:51:27+00:00): No problem, I can speak and read french, but I feel terribly insecure when writing.
Vinber (2023-03-11 09:28:43+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a doublon entre le parking vélo :
- sous forme de "way" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78429530
- sous forme de "node" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7249698992

on supprime le noeud ? ou il y a 500 places ?
Florent33 (2023-03-11 14:39:02+00:00): bonjour, 
Je ne maîtrise pas assez les subtilité entre way et note pour vous apporter une réponse sûre, désolé !
vnourdin (2023-03-11 20:06:37+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai eu le cas quelques fois, il semble mieux de conserver uniquement la zone (le way) qui donne plus d'informations !
Si, en effet, il n'y a "que" 250 places et pas 500.
Vinber (2023-03-13 20:01:06+00:00): bonjour Florent33,
pas à être désolé, tu as apporté les infos, c'est super.
En bref (node, noeud, c'est un point) et (way, chemin et si le chemin est fermé c'est une surface)
En fait, c'est surtout de savoir si il y a 250 places ou 500 places ? j'avoue j'ai la flemme d'y passer en arrivant ce soir à la gare :)

Si il y a "que" 250 places, alors on gardera seulement la partie surfacique (way) car c'est plus précis (le contour) et on supprimera le point (node, noeud).

Bonne carto
Mathias_ADAV (2023-03-27 10:32:57+00:00): 

En 2018 : 370 places pour l'abri vélo Belcier.

Doublon dans OSM ? Ici 2 fois 250

https://sedeplacer.bordeaux-metropole.fr/Actualites/Decouvrez-les-Parcs-Velos-St-Jean
Vinber (2023-04-03 07:43:03+00:00): je ne suis pas sur de comprendre Mathias :
- coté doumercq, 2 * 250 -> 1 en node, 1 en way. doublon je pense et capacity=* à creuser car le lien que tu donnes évoque capacity=350 pour le parking vélo doumerck
- coté belcier, c'est ok il est bien renseigné https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639677512 (modulo 10 entre le site et osm pour capacity=*)

ok, il faut que j'y pense la prochaine fois que je vais sur la gare :)
Mathias_ADAV (2023-04-04 07:48:14+00:00): Bonjour, en effet je crois que j'ai confondu doumercq et belcier..!

A priori c'est 350 places à doumercq, donc si c'est bien le cas, il faudrait supprimer le doublon et mettre 350 au lieu de 250.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-01 15:43:32+00:00): Cześć, dodałeś tylko do budynku nazwę, a nie oznaczyłeś typu obiektu (straż pożarna). Popatrz w edytorze jak są zmapowane inne OSP i tu zrób tak samo.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-01 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
osmee333 (2022-09-01 14:28:52+00:00): Geänderte Busroute, um die fehlende Haltestelle aufzunehmen. Ich bin mit der Bearbeitung von Routen nicht vertraut, bitte überprüfen Sie meine Arbeit, um sicherzustellen, dass die Haltestelle Kurt-Schumacher-Allee der Route 2 > Schenefeld korrekt hinzugefügt wurde. Vielen Dank!
henriko (2023-04-08 20:14:38+00:00): Here, the Marin&Fritid-building looks somewhat more like it actually does irl.
user_5359 (2022-09-03 05:32:05+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9993034500 (one of six objects). What is the meaning of the tag Arbust = naturel?
Boff II (2022-09-02 14:33:12+00:00): À corriger pistes cyclables en double sur le Boulevard des Entreprises et la Rue Bouthillier à Boisbriand et Rosemère.
Boff II (2022-09-02 14:37:45+00:00): Connexions déficientes des pistes cyclables au carrefour de la Montée Sanche et du Boulevard des Entreprises et de la rue Bouthillier
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-09-02 15:25:48+00:00): It should be fixed in my last changeset. Montée Sanch is not yet completed going north from Bouthillier/Des Entreprises. Should be completed tonight.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-09-02 15:26:04+00:00): Thanks for telling me!
guillemmal (2022-09-01 22:40:08+00:00): Estimado, en el lugar que editó ya se encuentra el nodo con la dirección proporcionada por la Municipalidad de Rivadavia, no es correcto completar la etiqueta name con la dirección o algo referido a ella. Lo invito a participar del grupo de Telegram de OSM https://t.me/osm_ar y de ahi lo derivaremos el grupo específico de San Juan
Allison P (2022-09-01 21:55:53+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. I have removed your business because it is clearly a private residence and there is no physical presence (I cannot go there to buy anything).
user_2066394 (2022-09-01 15:51:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
habi (2022-09-09 07:19:26+00:00): Ciao atarico
You've 'downgraded' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31775418/ from residential highway to path, e.g. disallowing all motorized traffic here.
From the aerial imagery it looks like most part of it is indeed a residential highway.
And https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3351441 mentions that until the curve it's still a residential highway.
I've changed it back in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125968765, could you check if my changes are correct?
Greetings from Bern,
habi
habi (2022-09-09 07:20:36+00:00): Also, tagging `horse=unknown` on a path doesn't make sense in my opinion :)
Gio Mantis (2022-12-21 13:20:54+00:00): Ciao, sono nativo di Mistretta il paese che hai contribuito a mappare, e te ne sono grato, volevo chiederti se conosci qualche fonte di dati da cui poter attingere per continuare ad arricchire la mappa. Saluti
somix (2022-09-01 16:50:56+00:00): Здравствуйте! В название надо писать только название объекта, а не личное мнение, описание, придуманные названия и т.п.
somix (2022-09-01 16:52:55+00:00): И ещё. Тип объекта, который вы использовали, подходит только для специально сделанных как кемпинг мест.
Glassman (2022-09-02 22:17:41+00:00): Where is the gate located? I see a guard house but no gate or signs stating this is private. Does that mean guests can't visit friends living in the area because that is what access=private means. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access for a detailed description of the access tag. Let me know if you need help. I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125663245
SekeRob (2022-09-01 16:40:27+00:00): It is suspected the previous mapper considered some area for the new rail corridor but much wider than the 1 track line thart already exists here. The vineyard next to the repaird farmland still looks to have a wrong shape, rail or no rail.
Emilius123 (2022-09-15 10:10:12+00:00): Ehre
seattlefyi (2022-09-01 23:33:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Sounds reasonable to me, thanks for the fix. Feel free to Pass Through any time!
starsep (2022-09-01 17:26:07+00:00): Dzięki za pierwszą edycję. Wygląda dobrze. Czy znajduje się wewnątrz Adidasa? Nie widzę go dodanego, zdaje się że dopiero co został otwarty.
PaulaSn (2022-09-01 17:33:30+00:00): tak, znajduje się na ostatnim piętrze nowego sklepu adidas Warszawa