piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-11-12 16:00:50+00:00): Hoi,

Ik pas even wat aan zolas het in de BGT omtrekgericht en in de BAG is ingemeten. Die zien het als één pand onder adres nr 20 
Adresnode 18 zal ik verwijderen.
met 
ID 0637100000151561
bouwjaar 1974

Ik gebruik de BAG en de BGT als achtergrond erbij.
Dan moet je zomaar even kijken.
Denk dat het wel klopt.
Even paar keer ctrl-F5 toetsen om het effect te zien. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-12 16:03:08+00:00): moment... Denk dat jij ook bezig was. Dan kan ik niet uploaden.
Shaya Joemmanbaks (2021-11-12 16:04:04+00:00): aaah, ja klopt. Ik doe nu even niets
eggie (2021-11-12 16:06:31+00:00): Ik heb nu aangepast aan de BAG en BGT data. Verder gebruik ik Quick Ortho 2021 als achtergrondfoto. Die zijn identiek.
Je moet maar eens kijken.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-12 16:10:17+00:00): Deze instelling zit hier
https://www.wilmahuis.nl/

Je zou het kunnen toevoegen met amenity=social_facility met social_facility=

Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility

Je kunt de adresnode gebruiken om bij te taggen.
Gr eggie
Shaya Joemmanbaks (2021-11-12 16:13:01+00:00): nee, dit klopt niet. Wilmahuis is hetzelfde als Wilmaplaats en deze is bij Schuitwater 2. Hazewater 20 zijn twee aan elkaar geplakte woonhuizen op 1 erf.
Shaya Joemmanbaks (2021-11-12 16:15:39+00:00): Dank u voor de tips! Ik ben heel erg nieuw. In mijn thesis maak ik gebruik van OSM data en dan specifiek de huizen en heb ook door de hele buurt gelopen en de huizen gecontroleerd aangezien dit straks input zal zijn in mijn verkeersmodel. Dus vandaar dat ik wel graag heb dat deze info correct staat aangegeven.

Groeten,

Shaya
eggie (2021-11-12 16:17:41+00:00): Up to the local mapper.. en dat ben jij. 😀
Shaya Joemmanbaks (2021-11-12 16:22:01+00:00): haha mapper is wel een mooi groot woord voor mij nu!
user_12625593 (2021-11-12 20:16:58+00:00): Andere ervaren(er) mapper hier: als je de flatgebouwen hebt aangepast, dan mag je de bijhorende opmerkingen afsluiten (oplossen). En welkom&succes :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
Kovoschiz (2021-11-13 10:02:59+00:00): What does this achieve?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:49:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5596272451/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
highflyer74 (2021-11-13 09:53:11+00:00): Hello!

This is a motocross track. The tag you changed it to is probably not correct. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack for details and compare with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Draceway.

Thank you!
sbelemey (2021-11-15 09:00:06+00:00): Hi, highflyer74!
yes, i agree with you. thanks for fixing my mistake. 

best regards!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
maraf24 (2021-11-12 17:24:48+00:00): Leviat != Lewiatan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
351293 (2021-12-10 15:12:35+00:00): Hallo, ich habe Deinen Änderungssatz nun mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114788783 wieder rückgängig gemacht. Bitte entferne keine Daten aus den Karten, die gelöschte Objekte (in dem Fall railway=razed) beinhalten, wenn Du nicht weißt, was Du tust.
In OSM ist es üblich, dass u.a. zurückgebaute Bahnstrecken als solche hinterlegt werden. Einige Nutzer verbringen Stunden damit, solche Strecken einzutragen, damit diese z.B. auf OpenRailwayMap zu sehen sind.
Ansonsten hast Du auch eine Straße berichtigt, indem Du sie neu erstellt hast. Falls möglich, berichtige bitte vorhandene Objekte, ohne, dass Du die bisherige Form löschst und sie anschließend neu erstellst. Die Objekte in OSM haben eine Chronik, in der Änderungen nachvollzogen werden können. Diese Chronik löschst Du mit dem Objekt zusammen, wodurch die früheren Daten nicht oder nur noch sehr schwer einsehbar werden.
LG
Vinber-Pro (2022-06-20 16:23:11+00:00): Bonjour Clothilde,
attention ce fastfood semble être au milieu de la route ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2400681668#map=19/44.48287/-1.07565

Peux-tu vérifier son emplacement stp ?

Vincent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
Leo Slager (2022-10-01 10:30:01+00:00): Are these roadworks completed yet ?
Ruben Van de Velde (2022-10-01 10:32:51+00:00): No, best case for this phase is mid-November
Leo Slager (2022-10-01 10:35:53+00:00): Thanks
adrianojbr (2021-11-12 23:42:40+00:00): Excelente trabalho. Obrigado por ajudar a completar o mapa da minha cidade natal.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113698186
Maria Simonette (2021-11-16 12:41:41+00:00): Obrigada pelo feedback, Adriano!
zstadler (2022-02-22 20:26:50+00:00): Hello Maher Arafat,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001771544
was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?

Regards,
zstadler
zstadler (2022-05-26 13:06:20+00:00): Added a building=yes tag
WashuOtaku (2021-11-14 04:01:04+00:00): Why is the Metropolitan missing?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse (2021-11-13 11:29:47+00:00): Hello sillymaps and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks fir updating the map!  Just one thing - you don't need to use the name "house" to say that a building is a house - the tags that get added ("building=house") automatically do that.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
ZLima12 (2021-11-16 00:19:09+00:00): Hi,

It looks like you meant to just trace one building, but you (presumably accidentally) also mangled some road geometry around the intersection of Maple Street (NY-129), Wells Avenue, and Van Cortlandt Place. From the changeset tags, it looks like your editor tried to warn you about this. Please make sure to pay attention to these warnings, and make sure you haven't done something wrong accidentally. For now, I'll go ahead and revert all of the changeset except for the building that you added.

Additionally, I noticed that you added address information to the house that you traced, presumably from the node that was located on it. I would encourage this, as long as it's a simple case like this one, but just make sure to delete the node afterwards. Otherwise there would be two objects with the same address, unnecessarily.

With all that said, thanks for contributing to OSM! If you have any questions, feel free to message me.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-17 09:38:37+00:00): Hallo Raana02,

das leisure=sport_center als inner halte ich nicht für richtig, da das Sport-Gelände alles umfassen sollte, also auch die äußere Rennbahn.

Außerdem würde ich gerne das Stadion als separate Fläche (leisure=stadium) erfassen.

Gruß Roger Wilco
Raana02 (2021-11-17 09:51:29+00:00): Moin Roger Wilco,
Ja, du hast recht. Vielleicht muss auch die Wiese drumherum noch mit eingeschossen werden. Nur Spielfeld passte auch nicht. Das Stadion separat zu erfassen macht auch Sinn.
Gruß Raana
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
user_5359 (2021-11-14 12:47:30+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wieso ist das Büro (? keine Angaben zum Büro des e.V. gemacht) nicht im Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119893079 mit der gleichen Adresse?
forumF-Online (2021-11-15 09:25:56+00:00): Nee, ist in Südtrakt und der Zugang ist über die Treppe, vor der ich die 3 platziert habe. Das gesamte Bürgerzentrum alte Feuerwache hat die Hausnummer 3, so dass die 3 bei dem Gebäude rechts neben dem Eingang von der Melchiorstr. aus sich nicht auf dieses Gebäude bezieht, sondern auf das gesamte Areal. Inzwischen ist aber eine andere Lösung gefunden und die zweite, von mir eingesetzte '3' kann gerne entfallen.
philippec (2021-11-12 18:20:36+00:00): Brugge Diksmuidestraat aed, de poort blijft dus altijd open ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2832359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
CRCulver (2026-06-07 09:38:27+00:00): Please do not add wild-camping places to OSM. Those are non-verifiable and they belong on another database, like iOverlander. The camping_site tag on OpenStreetMap is only for campsites that are official in some way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
habi (2021-11-18 10:00:16+00:00): Hey

You've added a bunch of buildings around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5574522586/ whichs geometry don't match the Maxam Imagery at all.

Also you've added non-connecting highways, which doesn't make sense, for example, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583017234/

Please try to increase the quality of your additions to OSM!

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
mini-me (2021-11-12 17:32:24+00:00): Прекращайте ломать трамвайные маршруты. Просто поменять точку платформы на линию недостаточно. Читайте https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Public_transport и делайте правильно, а лучше вообще не трогайте. Смысла в такой замене нет.
andrewsuzuki (2022-07-25 00:11:02+00:00): I believe tracktype=grade1 is only for paved surfaces
David Reik (2022-07-26 11:49:56+00:00): highway=track with tracktype=grade1 renders as a solid brown line on www.openstreetmap.org, which I think pretty clearly indicates to viewers that the road is unpaved.  I use that combination of tags when the road is unpaved but sufficiently improved that a standard car could drive on it.
andrewsuzuki (2022-07-26 16:34:04+00:00): Shouldn't tag incorrectly to make openstreetmap-carto look a certain way, that's considered Tagging For The Renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).
The page for tracktype (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype) suggests the tag primarily refers to surface firmness -- looking at the photo example table, pretty much all of them from grade1-grade5 are drivable. The named compacted roads at Cockaponset are probably best tagged as grade2 or grade3.
For drivability I would instead use the smoothness tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness), which "provides a classification scheme regarding the physical usability of a way for wheeled vehicles, particularly regarding surface regularity/flatness".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
blackboxlogic (2021-11-14 12:49:53+00:00): Thanks for adding this building (and the others). When you add a building and put an address on it, please delete the the node which previously had that address, otherwise there are two elements with the same address. In this case, that would be to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7176598018, (after making sure any/all details on the node have been put on the building, I noticed you didn't add addr:postcode to the building)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113702048
Pollux17 (2021-11-13 09:11:39+00:00): Ciao, questa modifica causa problemi alla piazza, perché è un multipoligono con varie aree interne. Ho dato un'occhiata alla proposta per type=street, non ho ancora approfondito ma comunque andrebbe fatta su un nuovo oggetto per non rompere la mappatura esistente. Per il momento sistemo, ma ne possiamo parlare qui
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:36:24+00:00): Sulle piazze posso avere la mia opinione o è documentato anche questo nella wiki?
Ritengo che sia meglio avere un nodo, dato che l'estensione di una piazza, se la mappa è fatta bene, diventa self-evident.
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 09:42:14+00:00): Prima chiedi e poi reverti?

Un nodo è meglio di nulla, ma un'area è piu' dettagliata. Cancellare un'area per un nodo comporta una perdita di dettaglio, non capisco perché dobbiamo discutere anche di questo.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:54:27+00:00): Il contrario, prima ho revertato e poi ho chiesto. Dato che non devo chiedere il permesso a te e non ho revertato per questa cosa ma per i peak. Dato che neanche con questa cosa ero d'accordo ho lasciato così com'era.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:57:24+00:00): Il mio ragionamento sulle piazze è quello che ho esposto. Forse è opinabile, ma mi sembra inutile avere un area che riempa lo spazio tra dei building.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:59:49+00:00): Le square non sono elementi utili come una pedestrian area che devono avere una outline ben definita, le square sono semplicemente nomi assegnati a dei buchi tra buildings.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:00:22+00:00): È sufficiente mettere il nome al centro di quest'area.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-13 11:22:08+00:00): For info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5447 .
trigpoint (2021-11-13 16:11:15+00:00): Why have you moved the location of the Wem node?

The position is chosen so that if someone requests they satnav to take them to Wem, they end up in a sensible place (such as the High Street). The middle of the school field is not sensible.

Cheers Phil
skquinn (2021-11-21 13:27:59+00:00): Changes in the US should not be mixed with changesets in Africa or Europe. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
dcskobuffs (2021-11-29 22:36:41+00:00): Hi skquinn, 
Thank you for reaching out. I will keep my edits more localized in the future.
adrianojbr (2021-11-12 23:44:18+00:00): Não é recomendado duplicar informações no mapa. No caso tratado, as informações de endereço já constam da área que representa o edifício, já que o comércio ocupa somente parte dele, sendo representado por um ponto dentro da área.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113703193
user_10901495 (2021-11-12 16:28:43+00:00): Changed Frasnedo to locality because I know it doesn't have residents.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-13 11:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725893 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in Italy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5447 and previous blocks on this mapper, and previous comments on changesets.
user_10901495 (2021-11-12 22:41:14+00:00): With this changeset I discover something new. Thank you!
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:04:25+00:00): È un doppione Ivan. L'ho già spiegato. Non me lo sono inventato io che i comuni sparsi vanno indicati solo nella relazione, è una consuetudine seguita anche da altri. Che senso ha inserire la label qui peraltro? Sei incoerente, dicevi che Prosto non era l'admin_centre ma poi hai sempre inserito il nodo della municipality dove si trova Prosto. Se si vuole inserire questa label va inserita a metà del fondovalle, non nell'admin_centre.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:06:20+00:00): Così sarebbe anche poco chiaro a un individuo che utilizzi la openstreetmap-carto e non conosca questo luogo: Si chiamerà Prosto o Piuro questo paese?
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 09:09:31+00:00):  Non ho nessun problema a spostarlo a metà del fondovalle. Vuoi che lo sposto dove avevi creato l'altro nodo a Borgonuovo? Cioè a 46,3287207, 9,4397422?
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:47:19+00:00): Sei poco aggiornato vedo, il nodo l'avevo cancellato inserendo Piuro come old_name di Borgonuovo.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:48:22+00:00): Poi perché devi fare flame quando io ho posto delle questioni normalissime?
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 09:51:36+00:00): Ripeto comunque, secondo me va cancellato perché anche in quel caso si ripresenterebbe il problema del mio secondo commento con Borgonuovo e sarebbe anche un doppione con la relazione del comune. Si veda Monrupino (Trieste).
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 10:12:56+00:00): Non ho fatto flame, ti ho chiesto dove volessi fosse spostato il nodo, ti ho detto che non ho nessun problema a spostarlo dove preferisci. Lo metto a metà tra Prosto e Borgonuovo? Oppure puoi spostarlo tu, basta che 1. non lo cancelli e lo ricrei per preservane la history e 2. la posizione sia all'interno del boundary

Ho seguito i consigli dati in ML secondo cui municipality è errato e sistemato con village secondo questo suggerimento: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2021-November/073106.html

Tu mi citi Monrupino, io potrei citarti:
Gattico-Veruno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6174922899
Castelgerundo (prima che lo cancelassi tu): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5315068459
Valdilana:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6174922896
ecc.ecc.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:20:25+00:00): Ma se non sono d'accordo! Perché mai dovrei spostarlo io? 
Etc etc non è un argomentazione, io ho citato solo Monrupino perché non mi sono messo ad investigare sulla questione e Monrupino mi era capitato per caso, i tuoi posti sono abbastanza underdeveloped quindi non hanno proprio una grande valenza.
Ovvio che se lo spostassi io la posizione sarebbe all'interno del boundary, dove vuoi che lo metta? Ovvio che se lo spostassi non lo dovrei cancellare, sennò non lo starei spostando. Logica aristotelica spostati proprio.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:22:30+00:00): I tuoi esempi sono tutti e tre nuovi comuni con 1 versione.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:23:01+00:00): 2 versioni per Castelgerundo.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:33:14+00:00): Tra l'altro io non ho citato Monrupino perché non ha il nodo, ma perché era stato cancellato da qualcuno proprio perché era un doppione, anche se non riesco a trovare il link per mandartelo.
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:34:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61021873
vbertola (2021-11-14 11:42:51+00:00): Ma smettete di litigare così. La cosa importante è che se qualcuno guarda la mappa della zona trovi Piuro al primo colpo, cosa che richiede la presenza di un nodo chiamato Piuro con un tipo che venga renderizzato correttamente dai più comuni renderer (tipicamente place=village). Non so se vada bene place=municipality ma il suo uso per i comuni sparsi è una invenzione di non si sa chi, dalla wiki inglese è chiaro che non è corretto e comunque non credo venga renderizzato. Che il nome ci sia sui comuni comunali è corretto ma non utile a chi guarda la mappa. Certo che se io guardo la nostra mappa a scala abbastanza piccola e sulla zona vedo scritto solo "Prosto" ma non "Piuro", come invece è scritto in tutte le altre mappe online ed offline, qualche problema c'è.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-13 11:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725893 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in Italy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5447 and previous blocks on this mapper, and previous comments on changesets.