piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2023-05-13 23:32:20+00:00): Hello,  you've added "seamark:type=wreck" to an artwork in the middle of Bowness https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5351865187/history .  This seems an unlikely tagging?
Best Regards,
Andy
chris_debian (2023-05-14 13:10:53+00:00): Andy, I completely agree; I have no idea what happened here, good spot! Tagging amended.

Many thanks,

Chris.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 13:47:49+00:00): Thanks!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:31+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:27+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
archie (2021-07-14 20:25:43+00:00): This cs has been reverted as it introduces - aigain - offset to correct placed buildings. I did recommend you in comment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107828424) to justify your imagebackground because your edits have all a certain offset. I did ask you not to displace correctly placed objects.
PT-53 (2021-07-16 06:16:10+00:00): Hallo jeka p,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Auffahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964406243/history
ein Hinsweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.70253&lat=47.55408&zoom=18&opacity=0.34

Du solltest den Weg auftrennen und mit unterschiedlichen Layern versehen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2021-07-16 06:18:46+00:00): Und was ist mit diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964406244/history
ohne Anschlüße ?
PT-53 (2021-07-24 05:43:45+00:00): Hallo jeka p, 
kümmerst Du Dich noch darum?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-08-14 06:35:34+00:00): Hallo jeka p,
kümmerst Du Dich noch darum?
Fragende Grüße
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:23+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:19+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
OddlyAngled (2021-07-15 14:22:51+00:00): are these actually tracks or paths?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108000327
s7726 (2021-07-21 13:02:01+00:00): Gaia just got back to me this was a mistake. Not sure how to cancel it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108000327
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:11+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:15+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
hoserab (2021-07-14 20:38:26+00:00): Hello wsmiteh,

I appreciate that someone else is trying to tackle issues with the way the +15 network has been mapped, and "indoor mapping" as a whole is still pretty rough.

That said, with all due respect, how was the level=1 tagging here "inaccurate"? For someone trying to navigate the network does it not help to know the corridors that interconnect to bridges to other buildings are on the level above ground floor...?
wsmiteh (2021-07-15 15:34:28+00:00): Hey hoserab,

It's possible that I have misunderstood the tag - I've been investigating issue(s) where the Directions API doesn't function correctly because of that tag. 

Is the priority that it is 'correct' in the sense that someone could dig into openstreets and see that - or that the tools being used for navigation are able to understand what is actually being presented? 

This might just be mapbox's problem but their support has been entirely unresponsive.

The thought behind inaccurate (and maybe that sounds too harsh) was that as far as most API's are concerned, the plus15 isn't REALLY a level-change. 

By all means feel free to revert the changes until I have more clarity on this, haven't touched anything else besides that one section for testing.
hoserab (2021-07-15 18:35:49+00:00): Thanks for replying. I was a little concerned about the "inaccurate" remark because I wasn't sure if you were under the (mistaken) impression that the +15 network isn't on the second floor ("Level=1"). ;)

With respect to your question, "Is the priority that it is 'correct' in the sense that someone could dig into openstreets and see that - or that the tools being used for navigation are able to understand what is actually being presented?" the answer is the former, not the latter. In short, if the Mapbox API doesn't handle navigation properly because it doesn't know what to do with the level=* tag, that's a problem with Mapbox's API, not OSM. Keep in mind Mapbox isn't the only consumer using OSM data.

One of OSM's most basic rules/good practices is "don't tag for the renderer" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). The gist is we don't map things incorrectly for the sake of aesthetics or making it easier for third-party consumers to "use" the data. As a rule if routing or geocoding apps don't work properly we don't jury-rig the map as a workaround.

Per the OSM guidelines for pedestrian navigation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation#Ways_inside_buildings) "an indoor way must hold the tag level=* to define the floor where it is located".

There are lots of other errors with the way this is mapped; the fact that most of it is mapped as "foot paths" is in and of itself a potentially large problem, because if a routing API is really using this data properly it should have all sorts of errors about paths crossing buildings. You can also notice many of the path segments are named "Plus 15 Skywalk" or the like, which really shouldn't be; the network relation is named "Plus 15", the paths themselves have no name as such.

Hope this all makes sense.
redd (2026-02-09 21:38:02+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
In diesem Changeset wurde scheinbar ohne Ortskenntnisse Gebäude von BW-Plänen angemalt.

Es gibt einen Hinweis, dass ein von dir erfasstes Objekt nicht existiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5151507

Grüße,

Redd
marc__marc (2024-09-11 10:15:22+00:00): Hello,
what's that ? a survey_point ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dsurvey_point
Happy mapping
aweech (2021-07-15 14:43:03+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I noticed that you were using the tag "atspm:signal_id" to document the ID number of these stoplights in Riverdale. In OpenStreetMap, we use the "ref" key for ID numbers, including those on traffic signals, as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_cars.
wadeosm (2021-07-15 14:57:50+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out aweech, I will correct my mistake.
gscscnd (2021-07-15 06:32:19+00:00): Czy tracktype=grade3 jest jeszcze aktualne?
impiaaa (2021-07-14 23:58:12+00:00): You appear to have changed much more than just adding buildings. Please use more descriptive changeset comments. Also, I see that nodes from a highway were used for a building. Please only reuse nodes when adjusting geometry, not for unrelated new geometry.
skorasaurus (2021-07-16 18:48:42+00:00): 
Janet_EG, 

Thank you for adding this and many other black museums and institutions to OSM.
bxl-forever (2021-07-18 16:19:20+00:00): Hello,
Do you know about the situation for cyclists?
You used a generic oneway=yes tag here, hence I suppose you wanted to forbid cyclists from using it in both directions, just like motor traffic.  Is that correct?
Bigon (2021-07-19 08:07:37+00:00): Hello,

Indeed, I don't remember an exception for bikes, just a plain oneway sign
bxl-forever (2021-07-19 10:54:12+00:00): Thanks.  So be it, then.
OsmAnd_Pieter (2021-08-04 12:54:18+00:00): I guess the town responsibles have forgotten then to add the exception for the cyclists to be bidirectional. I will write to the responsible people in the governement on this. Goal is to have the cyclist pass on this bridge as the cycle path ends on both sides of the river.  And the big square north of the bridge is a hazard for cyclists.  on Google maps you can see that the bridge was in use for cyclist only. I need to go and check the latest situation again. Maybe they did a test and will adapt the signs , but execution is still awaiting the realisation.
OsmAnd_Pieter (2021-08-06 07:13:52+00:00): 05/08/2021: I confirm "sur place" that the bridge is as I originally mapped it, with a bikelane at the South for bidirectional cycling.  The signs have been added for cyclists to the signpost seen on google maps.
Myazyk (2022-08-28 11:02:11+00:00): Шо то за такі дивні висоти будівель ти ставиш? Стайня 3-5 метрів заввишки, хата 7-8 метрів. Двоповерхові будівлі у тебе заввишки 12-19 метрів
rskedgell (2021-07-14 21:03:53+00:00): That was quick, thanks! I was going to do it after breakfast tomorrow :-)
archie (2021-07-14 21:24:40+00:00): alt_name_1 är inget giltigt nyckelnamn. Vem är det som använder namnet "Kampanilen"? Det finns loc_name=* som är avsedd för namn med endast lokal spridning. Vänligen ta bort alt_name_1.
archie (2021-07-14 21:39:41+00:00): Problemet här är även att tornet finns här både som nod och closed way. Noden skulle nog egentligen bara vara avsett för seamark-taggarna. Det här är nog lite otillfredställande.
archie (2021-07-14 21:51:31+00:00): Jag har sammanfört noden och "ringen" på tornet samt tagit bort alt_name_1. Vi får se om det blir bättre så. Åter igen vem använder namnet "Kampanilen" på vårt Sjömanstornet?
Gödmar (2021-07-14 22:45:25+00:00): Åtminstone de som har döpt sitt kafé efter tornet, använder namnet Kampanilen :) Wikipedia gör det också. Min salige morfar gjorde det, och jag gör det.
Gödmar (2021-07-14 22:47:57+00:00): alt_name var redan upptaget. Jag testade ändå och programmet döpte själv om taggen till alt_name_1.
archie (2021-07-14 23:54:44+00:00): Gör inga taggar av typen _1. Om du och din morfar är från området omkring och det måhända finns några till som kallar den kampanilen så kan det vara frågan om loc_name=Kampanilen. Men det måste finnas täckning för det. Wikipedia säger du, ja men då är det väl klart.
Gödmar (2021-07-15 09:44:49+00:00): Jag vet inte hur mycket ironi det finns i din kommentar om Wikipedia. Jag räknade upp ett antal exempel på förekomster av "Kampanilen", men det är ingen kulle jag har lust eller orkar dö på. Om man googlar "kampanilen sjöfartsmuseet" hittar man många fler, men jag får känslan av att eftersom du inte hör ordet till vardags så räcker det inte.
archie (2021-07-15 10:04:54+00:00): Oh, det var faktiskt ingen ironi från min sida den här gången. Du verkar ha mer insikt i det här än vad jag verkar ha. Välj om "Sjömanshustru" är loc_name eller alt_name och taggar Kampanilen med den taggen som blir över. Med andra ord taggar det som du tror är lokalt som loc_name och det överblivna namnet som alt_name. Jag överlåter det till dig att bestämma. Sedan kan det finnas andra meningar, men då få de ändra med angivande av goda argument. Något annat menade jag faktiskt inte.
Gödmar (2021-07-15 14:33:50+00:00): Okej, jag förstår. Jag ber om ursäkt för min feltolkning. Skriver in Kampanilen som loc_name.
archie (2021-07-15 16:36:48+00:00): ingen fara. Såg det. helt ok
GinaroZ (2021-07-14 22:19:31+00:00): Don't think this should be a pedestrian area - going by Mapillary it just seems like a normal road but with paving stones, and the only restriction is no parking?
DressyPear4 (2021-07-15 11:24:43+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta, não coloque como secundária uma via de acesso, use estrada vicinal
user_11418917 (2021-07-15 12:33:09+00:00): Stop adding spam!
Carto_Ferret (2021-07-14 21:37:48+00:00): Aligned, added, and reclassified some roads east of Μεγάλο Μετόχι.
Source: Maxar Premium Imagery (-0.90; -10.45); Strava
iandees (2021-07-15 03:01:08+00:00): Please don't delete driveways from the map. They are useful map data as long as they actually exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
iandees (2021-07-15 03:03:23+00:00): Also, these polygons look like data imports. Can you talk about where they're coming from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
SpeedMcCool (2021-07-15 03:11:06+00:00): @iandees, my intention is to add back driveways as I fill out southern maplewood. The old ones were (in my opinion) low quality and occasionally inaccurate.

As for the geometries, I imagine you're referring to the land cover or trails, which I am filling in based on aerial imagery and my experience exploring the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
iandees (2021-07-15 03:15:33+00:00): If you spot low quality or inaccurate data, please improve it instead of deleting it.

Yes, I am referring to the land cover geometries. Can you talk about how you draw them? The node spacing is really regular and doesn't look hand-traced. What imagery layers are you using?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
SpeedMcCool (2021-07-15 03:20:13+00:00): I am drawing them by hand from the Bing Aerial imagery. If my spacing is particularly consistent, I suppose I would take that as a compliment (unless it's not correct for some reason.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
iandees (2021-07-15 03:23:29+00:00): :) It looks good! Maybe too many nodes, but that's not the end of the world.

It was suspicious because iD will usually automatically add information about the imagery layers used while editing and they aren't there on your changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
SpeedMcCool (2021-07-15 03:25:35+00:00): Strange... Anything I can do to fix that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
iandees (2021-07-15 16:43:50+00:00): You're doing the right thing. I was looking in the wrong spot. Nevermind!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
prudhraj (2021-07-28 06:21:34+00:00): Hi SpeedMcCool, hope  you doing well. Please add all the service roads & driveways deleted in these changesets https://osmcha.org/changesets/107669710/ &  https://osmcha.org/changesets/107671468/  
Excellent work in adding Land-use features, also  kindly add the deleted road segments.
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108002745
Tijgerd (2021-07-16 06:02:15+00:00): Goedemorgen A67-A67, 
Ik wordt altijd vrolijk van meer details in de kaarten!
Wel een kort vraagje: is het platform geen Area = Yes?
A67-A67 (2021-07-16 14:51:47+00:00): Hallo,
In principe is area=yes niet nodig, omdat een gesloten way bij een perron als een vlak aanduidt.

Volgens de wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=platform):
"Draw a line way along the centre of the platform or create an area around the outline of the platform, and add the tag highway=platform."

Als je dus de outline gebruikt, zoals ik heb gedaan, dan krijg je een gesloten way en geeft het dus een vlak aan. De andere mogelijkheid met een lijn door het midden zal geen gesloten way opleveren.

De tag area=yes kan natuurlijk altijd toegevoegd worden om dubbelzinnigheid te voorkomen.
skorasaurus (2021-07-16 21:18:04+00:00): hi steve, 

thanks for adding the USBR 21; that was a lot of work! 

I was concerned that the USBR 21 that you had mapped north of the cuyahoga river is incorrect; part of the road that USBR ends at is private (gated) and is for an industrial business...  I biked this area earlier this week.  I am assuming that perhaps USBR is supposed to on Whiskey island, which is north of the NS chicago line railroad tracks and is 

(maybe it ends at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957003778/ ?)
skorasaurus (2021-07-16 21:22:59+00:00): should correct be corrected as " I am assuming that perhaps USBR is supposed to on Whiskey island, which is north of the NS chicago line railroad tracks; there's a bridge that recently opened over the railroad tracks - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/818563656 . 

There's also a dedicated, separate cycleway lane along river road which I added as well, perhaps that should also be in USBR 21?
stevea (2021-07-16 21:29:26+00:00): PLEASE change the USBR 21 relation to contain actual, better bicycle infrastructure along here.  There are a lot of eyeballs looking at whether we're getting it right here, so, yeah, a local mapper who ride/rode it absolutely ROCKS at entering better route relation elements here.  Yeah!

Thanks for the shout-out.  Great to see your name, mapping and well, go OSM!
stevea (2021-07-16 21:47:12+00:00): OK, I think I got the Whiskey Island north end the way you describe (and so does ODOT's application to AASHTO now make better sense).

However, any other parts, especially ones you recently biked in the last week, PLEASE, you are fully qualified to "fine tune" the route anywhere!
Marek-M (2021-07-15 05:28:39+00:00): Cześć, ten chodnik jest już wybudowany w rzeczywistości? Nie zwracałem na niego ostatnio uwagi i może faktycznie już go ukończyli. Jeśli tak się stało, to powinieneś go otagować jako 
highway=footway
zamiast highway=path
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108003483
gnysek (2021-07-15 07:33:30+00:00): Tak, jest wybudowany od 2 tygodni, zmienię parametr, thx.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108003483
L'imaginaire (2021-07-15 06:37:16+00:00): Dag diedie2,
Bedankt om hier een eerste aanzet voor te doen, maar er is nog wel wat werk aan (bijv. rondpunt rond maken, hoofdweg over rondpunt laten lopen, routerelaties verleggen ... ). Ik zal een dezer een kleine opkuis doen. Sowieso geen gemakkelijke taak voor een startende mapper. Laat gerust iets horen mocht je vragen hebben bij het mappen!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-15 11:22:04+00:00): Não, use o mapa para isso!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108003685
zorglubu (2021-07-15 08:55:26+00:00): Bonjour,

et bienvenue sur Openstreetmap.
Je n'ai pas détecté de problèmes dans vos modifications, j'ai juste une interrogation sur des "parking_position" connectées à rien, comme E16,E17 ou E18. Mais c'est peut-être normal :-)

Je vous invite à être plus précis dans la description d'un groupe de modifications, cela aide énormément les autres utilisateurs à comprendre le travail fait. Par exemple mettre "Ajout de parking_positions" plutôt que "modifications mineures".

Surtout, continuez à contribuer ! Merci encore.
Rainero (2021-07-18 10:00:49+00:00): Hallo László Telavarro,

bei beisem Änderungssatz ist einiges schiefgegangen. Die PLZ-Grenze 42651/42655 ist jetzt gerader, aber falsch. Dazu zeigt der Editor an, daß bei Hochladen 31 doppelte Punkte ignoriert wurden. Das verursacht nun Arbeit für andere Mapper, diese Fehler wieder zu bereinigen.
Es ist sicher günstiger, wenn du Änderungen in kleineren Portionen vornimmst und dir die Warnungen des Editors erstmal anschaust und korrigierst. Doppelte Punkte sind gar nicht so einfach hinzukriegen. Wenn du nur wenige Änderungen machst und dann die Warnungen korrigierst, kannst du deine Arbeitsweise so verbessern, daß die doppelten Punkte gar nicht erst entstehen.

Diesen Änderungssatz werde ich teilweise zurücksetzen, um der PLZ-Grenze wieder ihren ursprünglichen Verlauf zu geben.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
László Telavarro (2021-07-30 20:03:46+00:00): Ich entschuldige mich vielmals wenn irgendein Fehler aufgetreten ist. Ich habe vor kurzem Osm für mich entdeckt bitte sie daher inständig mich zu entschuldigen und mich gegebenfalls Zu kontaktieren wenn irgendwas auffälliger ist. Ich finde die Map ist gut um soziale Treffpunkte für junge und alte Menschen hervorzuheben. Wie zum Beispiel Kirchen Synagogen Moscheen Parks Kitas Schulen  Museen Altenheime Freizeitgelände Kleingartenanlagen Gärten botanische Gärten Wälder Wanderwege Fahrrad Wege BMX Strecken usw. Alles was mich interessiert wenn mir ein Fehler unterlaufen ist könnten Sie oder die Person der das aufgefallen ist mich kontaktieren oder zur Not mir helfen  den Fehler beheben wenn  ich das nicht schaffen sollte.
MaddMapper (2021-07-14 23:03:32+00:00): Source Correction: Mapillary
stev (2021-07-15 13:43:20+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OSM.

just a note to say I'm not sure you should be adding "Byway" to the name of these byways. This is normally reserved for byways (or any other feature) which has an actual name. I can appreciate that you might not necessarily be able to see from the main map that this track is a byway as only the track itself is rendered. However, OSM is primarily a data repository and the map is a representation of that data. Given UK Rights of Way are relatively niche in the grand scheme of things but important in the UK, there are different renders focusing on that - e.g. see https://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/#

You could also look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_Rights_of_Way for specific guidance.

I would consider tagging Marshcroft Lane as a track rather than a road. I don't know this route, but if the road is not surfaced this is usually how to do it, although you can also tag as highway=unclassified and surface=unpaved. I would say highway=track implies less likely to be used by motor vehicles, more likely to be private etc, whereas highway=unclassified implies a public, metalled road. Other tags can clarify this though, but on the map highway=track are rendered like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23713498 as opposed to looking like roads as your new way does.

All of this is open to debate though.

Happy Mapping!

Stephen
Colin Smale (2021-07-15 20:10:48+00:00): I would suggest the railway=crossing where this byway/road crosses the WCML might not be appropriate here, as the road seems to cross the tracks on a bridge. Railway=crossing is used for level crossings.
hu9o (2021-07-19 09:04:40+00:00): Bravo! Juste pour le fun?
aharvey (2021-07-15 02:15:26+00:00): Have you seen StreetComplete https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete#readme helps survey details of these houses. And if you instead add them as generic building=yes then on the ground it will ask if it's detached, duplex, terrace, apartments etc.
Jack465 (2021-07-15 02:19:36+00:00): Yeah I have seen that application before. My plan was to first add them all as houses, and then go back along and add the street number for each one, and bulk edit to add street name, suburb, post code etc. I know the area I'm mapping very well, so determining duplex, apartment etc won't be an issue. Thanks for your comment! :)
OSMPossum (2021-07-14 23:46:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary; OSM Data
muralito (2021-07-15 00:20:39+00:00): Olá. Hoje não é recomendado usar as tags source: * em cada elemento, mas sim marcar a fonte no changeset.
portalaventura (2021-07-15 14:14:54+00:00): De maneira geral, a recomendação faz todo o sentido.

No caso especifico de nome de ruas, acho que não faz sentido abedicar da redundancia. Alem disso, a forma de taguear não está depreciada pelo o que eu entendi da wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source.

Aqui, apenas uma rua foi alterada. Se fossem mais de uma ou se faria a alteração em changeset diferentes ou source no changeset não permitiria dizer a qual rua cada lei de denominação se refere.

Além disso, para ver a fonte o usuario seria obrigado a buscar no historico qual changeset foi feita a adição do nome da rua.

Então, no caso de nome de ruas a redundancia ao utilizar source=law no chageset e o numero da lei no elemento me parece fazer sentido.


Agora, se olhar a tag source como apenas um meio de auxiliar outros mapeadores, não teria pq adicionar no elemento.

Mas, eu vejo a tag util para o usuario do dado também, especialmente na denominação de ruas.
tarta (2021-07-15 00:27:56+00:00): Lembre sempre de deixar o nome antigo na tag old_name.
Bom trabalho
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108005413