piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-01-05 01:28:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2018-01-05 11:13:57+00:00): Olá alexandrebc, quais as razões para as reclassificações das vias, feitas nesse changeset?
alexandrebc (2018-01-06 11:44:39+00:00): Tag:highway=trunk
Brazil	Rodovias nacionais (national highways, such as BR-262), vias expressas urbanas (urban expressways), 70-80 km/h

Tag:highway=primary
Brazil	Via arterial urbana (urban arterial way), estrada estadual (state road), >50-60 km/h

Tag:highway=secondary
A highway which is not part of a major route, but nevertheless forming a link in the national route network.
viloan (2018-01-05 01:42:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trial (2022-01-11 20:22:32+00:00): According to Osmose, invalid character - "name:be"="Тайв́ань" unexpected char "́" (COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT, 0x0301) for Taiwan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/449220).
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 01:02:14+00:00): Fixed in changeset #158140433: https://osm.org/changeset/158140433
viloan (2018-01-05 01:49:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2018-01-14 20:10:18+00:00): Hi,
This boundary is not closed (it does not form a loop to enclose an area). Are you going to finish it? Or should it just be deleted?
TuanIfan (2018-01-14 22:22:47+00:00): I'll do it tonight
TheSwavu (2018-01-14 23:53:22+00:00): And while you're at it: what is the source of this data?
TuanIfan (2018-01-15 04:33:59+00:00): @TheSwavu: it is based on the Interactive Mapping site of the Brisbane City council. I'll add the source later in my future edits.
TheSwavu (2018-01-15 09:41:50+00:00): OK, so that explains the Brisbane ones. Where did the ones around Bundaberg, that you put in, come from? And how about dropping a message on talk-au (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au) to let other mappers know that you are planning an import (which is step two of the guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).
TuanIfan (2018-01-15 10:00:56+00:00): Hi Swavu,

Bundaberg boundaries were drawn quite a few years ago, during a few months i was in hospital. I drew them on JOSM everyday based on Bundaberg Regional council's mapping site as well.

That's great to know all the steps. I haven't read the guidelines until now. 

Just a small question, does the guidelines apply to bulk with an automated tool (i.e. software, apps..) only? In the case of manual drawing, what other steps should I do (in addition a notice to the community via the mailing list, and obtain permission from the mapping site's owner)?

Sincerely,
TheSwavu (2018-01-15 10:08:37+00:00): It applies to anything you copy from another map or dataset. 

It also means we have a problem with the Bundaberg boundaries because we don't have permission to use them in OSM.
TuanIfan (2018-01-15 10:16:08+00:00): Thanks for your clear explanation.
user_5359 (2018-01-05 06:31:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for addr:state the two uppercase character abbrevation for the states.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
JJIglesias (2018-01-05 04:43:11+00:00): Saludos Marco. Yo le mande un mensaje en el Changeset a la persona que creo el node, para que clarificara que era eso de Apartments Bella Vista; si borras el nodo se pierde la informacion y la aclaratoria.
//
Podrias revetirlo?
Gracias
JJ
5m4u9 (2018-01-05 14:43:48+00:00): es un tema recurrente esto de apartaments desde mapsme. quieren registrar el barrio. en la noche voy a registrar el barrio, pero hay que tener cuidado porque son varias en pocas cuadras (viendo plan regulador sacaba)
vam_002 (2019-04-23 04:08:46+00:00): Hi  AuliaIshmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 550983546 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it is leading to a residential area,so this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
EugenyN (2018-01-05 13:45:57+00:00): здравствуйте. для всей парковки используйте тег amenity=parking.  parking_space - это отдельное место.  и не используйте name для описания. просто удалите этот тег. тут подробнее: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
viloan (2018-01-05 04:00:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Xapitoun (2018-07-03 05:16:34+00:00): Bonjour,
j’ai remarqué des erreurs qui auraient du être corrigées avant l’envoi :
* bâtiments sans attributs 
* nœuds orphelins
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
mueschel (2018-01-06 12:14:04+00:00): Hi Pablo,
welcome to OSM!
You used some tags like "lugar de fistas" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be used. 

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
Jan
pyrog (2019-11-17 07:54:11+00:00): Hi David,

The image value "Optimus Prime" is unusable. I couldn't find any picture on wikimedia commons with this name ;)

Could you upload a picture and add it's commons filename or URL ?

Regards,
_
Yves

image=File:Optimus_Prime_Model.JPG
image=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Optimus_Prime_Model.JPG
Mape (2018-01-05 05:22:56+00:00): I want to delete my whole change, it is completely wrong! How do I do this?
Tiamate (2018-01-05 07:11:46+00:00): 55176862 reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55178419
.
how to revert changeset:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 11:24:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:49:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
yaugenka (2018-03-28 23:30:55+00:00): Не удаляйте пожалуйста отношения населенных пунктов.
mueschel (2018-01-07 12:24:19+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure you add tags like "building=yes" only to the outline of the building, not to each individual node. 

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
5m4u9 (2018-01-12 05:39:42+00:00): in bolivia, we recommend separate buildings from the point amenity/shops/offices, it is very common to have more than one amenity/shop/office in the same building
Jan van Bekkum (2018-01-12 06:49:37+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for your comment. I do not change points to areas if a building contains more than one POI. This wasn't the case for these changes. However, I had a more general discussion about this with a colleague of yours. I will no longer change points to areas in Bolivia and I have reverted the ones in this change set.

Regards,

Jan
Alecs01 (2018-01-05 17:06:36+00:00): Hi, what is the meaning of all those "attraction" near that building?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
majid1359 (2018-01-05 06:56:48+00:00): نام محلی این مکان شهر بازی رشت است
user_5359 (2018-01-05 11:23:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.

Please be also careful when editing the map data. You moved two nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:51:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
KristianeMacke (2018-01-05 11:25:29+00:00): Am Fäbergraben ist nicht nur eine Grünfläche! Ich würde das als Park bezeichnen. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=park
Ich mache heute noch Bilder.
Chris Fleming (2018-01-06 08:52:55+00:00): Hi Colin, thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMao and making these changes, I think that the bridge and footway need to be tagged as highway=foorway and remove the rail tag! I'm also wondering what/where the bridge connects to on the other side?

Cheers
Chris
jfd553 (2018-04-02 12:07:38+00:00): The bridge is planned to be reconstructed this year (2018). It is not there yet. The bridge has been removed in 2015. It is the third time someone add the bridge from old geobase data :-(
Lacramioara Maghiar (2018-04-02 12:21:26+00:00): Thanks for updating the highway:construction. I apologize for the mistake!
Владимир К (2018-03-12 06:28:44+00:00): не надо добавлять описания в названия :(
Digne (2018-01-05 18:50:41+00:00): Hallo MauRisico,

Ik zag dat je om feedback had gevraagd.

Je geeft aan dat hier een fietspad is, maar je voegt een wandelpad toe. Was dat de bedoeling?
PlaneMad (2018-01-13 17:52:09+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55179855
Digne (2018-01-05 18:54:43+00:00): Hier heb ik weinig op te merken. Ik neem aan dat het pad tussen de bomen loopt in het zuiden, het loopt nu over de bomen heen. Misschien kan dat nog iets beter uitgelijnd worden.
eggie (2018-01-05 08:52:17+00:00): Nuttige aanvulling. Tip: Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je edits inhouden: Dus gewoon: added footway of wandelpad toegevoegd.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Aleks-Berlin (2018-01-06 17:13:34+00:00): hi CENTRALHUB, you added 3 strange tags ( ' = DigitalGlobe␣Premium␣Imagery ). Please fix this typo.
Thanks Alex
CENTRALHUB (2018-01-06 18:08:27+00:00): Already fixed. Thanks for telling me.
tyr_asd (2018-01-05 10:57:30+00:00): Nice work, thanks for the update! :)
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:19:10+00:00): Hi Pamodepa1, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55180411
user_5359 (2018-01-05 11:18:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
eggie (2018-01-05 11:51:42+00:00): Is het wellicht beter om het crematorium te taggen met amenity =crematorium  
volgens de wiki ipv shop=? 
Heeft het Crematorium in Meppel  ook een naam?
eggie (2018-01-05 11:58:59+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast en tevens alle info incl website op de adresnode getagd.
user_5173844 (2018-01-08 17:06:34+00:00): Hi, I see you are doing a lot of fantastic work these days. Just an advice - to make these buildings look tidier you can "square their corners" ("s" key in iD). Ctrl+c/v, r, m, y and t keys can be useful as well.
eggie (2018-01-05 11:34:11+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Je update is niet correct. Gebouwen zelf hebben geen adressen. Die bevinden zich al op de adresnodes. Bovendien is dit niet pand nr 151 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55181693
ik zal je bijdrage verwijderen.
eggie (2018-01-05 11:39:56+00:00): reverted 55181693
geow (2020-03-08 10:46:24+00:00): Hi Shamillah, you have added quite a few man_made=protected_spring here, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5333108154/history

What exactly do you mean, does protected_spring roughly match this definition in the OSM-wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dspring_box

Any feedback is appreciated, thanks!

Best regards
geow
Владимир К (2018-02-26 14:40:44+00:00): вот тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7877014 у вас что-то странное получилось. домов в мультиполигоне НП быть не должно. Вообще ничего, кроме собственно контура не должно быть.
de1phi (2018-02-26 14:42:31+00:00): на форуме не нашел единого мнения, нужно ли inner дома вносить или нет. Один из постоянных модераторов, советовал оформлять так.
Владимир К (2018-02-26 14:45:04+00:00): О_о а какой именно? Это очень странное заяление. Сколько всяких бурлений видел на форуме, но вот такое впервые слышу.
de1phi (2018-02-26 14:56:24+00:00): уже точно название темы не помню, года 2 назад изучал. Да и на немецких форумах так и не пришли к консенсусу =)
Владимир К (2018-02-26 15:29:24+00:00): Звучит как плохая шутка. :) Никогда такого не видел и в телеграме в чате никто о таком не знает:) никогда не слушал, чтобы кому то из потребителей данных это надо было. предлагаю дальше делать без вырезаний
stev (2018-01-11 17:31:04+00:00): Are you sure of the ownership boundary? The object before you changed it had been sourced from an OS dataset, so it is "official"
meatlug (2018-01-11 18:34:42+00:00): reverted changeset
abakus_uploader (2018-01-05 23:30:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
meatlug (2018-01-05 09:51:04+00:00): changed path type
avm (2018-05-14 07:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941959 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-05 11:11:30+00:00): Hi, you asked for a review. I think the only thing you did here was add the New Road to 3 different administrative relations? Is that what you intended? I don't think that's a right move, since it sorta makes 2 of the townlands invalid (geometrically). I can undo it if you want?
Kevin Kofler (2018-01-09 16:11:38+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

Was bitte ist die offizielle Quelle und/oder das Hinweiszeichen vor Ort für den Namen "Stadtpark-Kinderpark"? Soweit ich weiß, ist das Ganze der Stadtpark und sollte als ein gemeinsames Polygon oder notfalls ein Multipolygon gemappt sein.

Liebe Grüße,
        Kevin
Stefan Nagy (2018-01-09 16:29:23+00:00): Hallo Kevin,
angefangen hat das ganze mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/986107, dort sind auch die Links zu Quellen (einerseits auf der Website der Stadt Wien und im Wien Geschichte Wiki und andererseits vor Ort auf den Tafeln). Ich habe den Fehlerbericht extra vorerst offen gelassen, damit die Änderung leichter nachvollziehbar ist.
Liebe Grüße,
Stefan.
Kevin Kofler (2018-01-10 00:24:30+00:00): Also, wenn das wirklich vor Ort wo angeschrieben steht, wie in der Note angegeben, dann wird es wohl so stimmen. Der Stadtplan der Stadt Wien selbst kennt die Bezeichnung allerdings nicht, da steht alles nur als "Stadtpark", ebenso in den OGD und auf basemap.at.
Stefan Nagy (2018-01-10 08:47:37+00:00): Ich hab eine der Tafeln fotografiert, auf denen der Name "Stadtpark-Kinderpark" steht: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vsBT3ETo3JKLypADalu1vg. Ich weiß, dass der Stadtplan die Bezeichnung nicht kennt… Ich glaub auch, dass kaum jemand den Kinderpark als solchen kennt. Eben deswegen wollte ich den Fehlerbericht auch vorerst offen lassen. Vielleicht wäre es besser den ganzen Bereich als Stadtpark zu mappen und den Kinderpark nur mit alt_name, old_name oder so und einer erklärenden description? Ich fände es nur wichtig, dass der Kinderpark über die Suche gefunden werden kann.
stefanct (2021-08-21 13:35:17+00:00): Ich wollt mich auch gerade beschweren, aber nach einer Recherche besteht für mich kein Zweifel mehr, dass wir das als eigene Fläche auszeichnen sollten. 

Aktuell wird dieser Bereich aber offensichtlich als Teil des Stadtparks begriffen - offiziell auf den Webseiten (aber mMn auch dem Schild), als auch in der Bevölkerung. Früher war das ein bisschen anders: https://twitter.com/Tom_Harb/status/899703189741678593/photo/1
Auch damals war der Kinderpark (der ein bisschen später fertig gestellt wurde) aber als Ergänzung zum Teil im 1. Bezirk geplant, gebaut und verwendet. Der Hauptunterschied war die Nutzung: Im "Stadtpark" durfte man nicht spielen.

Das aktuelle Tagging taugt mir nicht, da sehr viel vom "eigentlichen" Stadtpark dupliziert wird, was zweifellos falsch ist. Das Stadtpark-Objekt sollte wohl die gesamte Fläche markieren, wie oben vorgeschlagen und alle relevanten Tags da drauf sein. Der Bereich im 3. Bezirk sollte nur ein Teil davon sein. Ich würde den dann auch eher mit name=Kinderpark (und vl. alt_name oder official_name=Stadtpark-Kinderpark) versehen, da das Prefix mMn nur ein Hilfsmittel ist, um die Teilmengenbeziehung auszudrücken.

Man könnte diesen Teil auch mit landuse=recreation_ground versehen, um den Unterschied noch zu unterstreichen und keinen Park innerhalb eines Parks zu haben. Durch den Fokus auf Sport- und Spieleinrichtungen und die Geschichte des Parks fände ich das sehr passend, aber ich bin sicher, dass das nicht nur Zustimmung finden würde :)

PS: Ich glaub der Kindergarten hat keinen (offiziellen) Namen und das aktuelle Tagging geht auf eine beschreibende Bezeichnung von Medienberichten zurück. Ich kann zumindest keine gute Quelle für den Namen finden. Am Gebäude steht nur das übliche "Kindergarten der Stadt Wien".