piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-25 11:25:07+00:00): Hello, if you want to edit in Moldova, please use ONLY moldovan ortophotos because Maxar, Bing and ESRI imagery aren't adjusted, and with these you destroy the real situation of things on the map. If you use JOSM, please use this WMS geoserver - https://moldova-map.md/geoserver/ows? After inputing this url, select the folder "Ortofoto (R.Moldova)" and select "2016 Ortofoto RM".

If you want to edit in iD please use this WMTS layer as a base imagery in Moldova - https://moldova-map.md/geoserver/gwc/service/wmts?layer=orthophoto:Ortofoto_2016_RM&style=&tilematrixset=EPSG:900913&Service=WMTS&Request=GetTile&Version=1.0.0&Format=image/png&TileMatrix=EPSG:900913:{z}&TileCol={x}&TileRow={y}

Good luck! 

PS: If you want to discuss about mapping in Moldova, please join our moldovan OSM group on Telegram - https://t.me/OSMMoldova
TheJAwesome1 (2020-09-25 18:09:33+00:00): Hello again Moldovan_Merkator! Thank you for providing those valuable resources. I appreciate the assistance and will make sure to use the imagery you provided for my edits in Moldova. Thank you again for the input.
naveenpf (2020-09-23 01:33:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91129697
eggie (2020-09-18 20:18:42+00:00): Hallo  l151820

Danke für Ihre Ergänzung.
In den Niederlande haben wir Konsens auf die Adresnoden zu ergänzen.
Bitte nicht eine Adresse selbst anmachen.

Grüss,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-18 20:23:24+00:00): Merged info with present addressnode..
greetz,
Eggie
Rogoyski (2020-09-21 21:00:06+00:00): Właśnie sobie pomyślałem, że tu podobna zabudowa, co na tej Bogucickiej i klops, to samo. Farmyard to zdecydowanie złe określenie.
syntex (2021-03-06 01:21:33+00:00): https://polskawzdluzszosy.blogspot.com/2018/01/osadnictwo-niemieckie-wzduz-ul.html
marc__marc (2021-03-12 09:48:13+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est l'ambassade de quel pays ?
Cordialement,
Marc
alester (2020-09-22 18:04:31+00:00): A road crossing a waterway doesn't necessarily mean there's a bridge. Many of these crossings on logging roads are culverts, especially if it's a minor waterway like some of these likely are. Unless you know there's a bridge there, it would be better to leave it as an "issue" so someone can know to check it in person and confirm which type of crossing it is. I do this myself when I'm out driving these logging roads.
morehawes (2020-09-23 16:36:39+00:00): Thanks for your input. My thinking was that it was more accurate to indicate a man-made structure crossing the waterway (even if not 100% accurate) rather than leave it as an issue which causes the road to be "broken". I noticed these because of routing problems. In hindsight I could have added a fixme tag to the nodes, but do you still think it's better to completely omit and leave it as an issue? Thanks, Joe
eggie (2020-09-18 21:16:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Bertware (2020-09-19 10:28:07+00:00): Question: The ground truth is that the forest reaches to the road. Official topographic maps, such as those from Lantmäteriet, also join landuse to the road. While this conflicts with the truth that there is a 3 or 4 meters wide road without forest or farmland, it seems to be more correct to say that the forest or farmland reaches the road, than to say it stops at a certain place. The first is guaranteed to be true, while you would need GPS traces to determine correctly where/how far from the road the forest actually stops. Some unglueing changes introduced larger mapping errors, meaning that in an attempt to fix these 3 or 4 meters wide road areas, other inaccuracies of over 10 meters are introduced. I don't see the benefit in unglueing. Unglueing makes it harder to edit/correct the roads in the future as well, as all neighbouring areas will need to be updated manually.
archie (2020-09-19 10:52:30+00:00): Openstreetmap is - in contrast to other geodata-systems - a one-layer construction. So things which don't belong together must be kept apart. The line for highways represents the mid of the road. I do not thing that landuse - often from both sides in your edits - meet in the middle of the road. By glueing highways and landuse together - often from both sides - it's really simple to map that way, I confess - you are blocking other users from accessing the highway.
eggie (2020-09-18 21:22:50+00:00): Dag Markosi..
Kijk even bij highway=service in de wiki
service=driveway ??
access=private

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway

Niet iedereen stelt het op prijs dat z'n oprit naar z'n garage op de kaart staat.
Kijk nog even svp.
MVG,
Eggie
markosi (2020-09-19 06:40:22+00:00): Good. I have accepted the information. I'll fix it.
eggie (2020-09-18 21:24:45+00:00): highway=service
service=driveway
access=private

Het kan allemaal wel, maar sommige mensen hebben hier moeite mee. 
Gr eggie
markosi (2020-09-19 06:40:50+00:00): Good. I have accepted the information. I'll fix it.
eggie (2020-09-19 06:57:42+00:00): Jolly good... have fun in mapping.
Eggie
pg007 (2020-09-26 11:07:44+00:00): dont worry bro i m with you
eggie (2020-09-18 21:26:55+00:00): Dag Markosi
Geef svp concreet aan wat je toevoegt.
Beter niet al die opritten toevoegen op priveterrein.. Het geeft vaak problemen. 
In ieder geval service=driveway
access=private
MVG,
eggie
markosi (2020-09-19 06:37:58+00:00): Ok. I accepted the information.
nereocystis (2020-10-23 16:36:07+00:00): This changeset incorrectly changes and sets addr:street to "Macarthur Boulevard" rather than "MacArthur Boulevard", with the second "a" changed to lower case.
Could you fix this please.
Thanks for adding the addresses, btw.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-10-23 19:38:13+00:00): Oops, sorry.
I've just corrected it by this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92968058
Thanks for noticing!
nereocystis (2020-10-24 18:08:50+00:00): And thank you for improving the map
Bertware (2020-09-19 10:13:56+00:00): These edits cause overlaps between landuse areas, for example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849012541

What is the reason for editing that particular area? The quality/accuracy went down significantly due to this edit
Bertware (2020-09-19 10:35:46+00:00): Another of the mapping errors introduced in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849012530 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849012526 are separated while they should be connected.
archie (2020-09-19 10:37:39+00:00): What did my comments on my changesets say?
Bertware (2020-09-19 10:38:43+00:00): You unglued scrub from farmland, while those two are neighbouring in reality
archie (2020-09-19 10:45:50+00:00): Well, we do not glue landuse to highways here in Sweden. I and other users do want access to the highways for e g creating route-relations or adding/correcting speed-limits. You are burying highways from both sides - for your convienency - and making highways unaccessable for other users. You should stop this practice which you applied in other places here in Sweden as well. Please unglue those highway/landuse-edits.
Bertware (2020-09-19 10:48:26+00:00): There is no difference between a small road which has forest glued to it and a small road without anything glued to it in the iD editor, this is a restriction of other editors I was unaware of
archie (2020-09-19 10:58:57+00:00): Please unglue highways from landuse in your past edits. Other users would like to do things of their own with those roads - creating route-relations (hiking-routes, buss-routes etc), changing/adding max-speeds etc. You are blocking others from using the roads.
VictorIE (2020-11-01 16:58:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849025080

What does building:levels=1.4 represent?

0.4 of a building storey doesn't seem tp make sense.
b-unicycling (2020-11-01 20:33:43+00:00): Hi VictorIE,
I have seen them before, but I didn't add them. I can't explain them either.
VictorIE (2020-11-01 20:38:42+00:00): Hi again, with that particular object, you were the person who created it originally. Might you have simply copied and pasted from one house to another?
saintam1 (2020-09-19 05:51:53+00:00): Hello, you removed the oneway tag but Mapillary clearly shows the street as one-way: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=42.725349376&lng=23.3018597122&z=17&pKey=RWKIfzrKLzNAtdjeok8MfQ

I think there's probably just a lot of cars parked the wrong way on the satellite image.
EptingR (2020-09-21 16:39:05+00:00): Hello, 

Thank you for that catch! Yes I agree the vehicles were just parked the wrong way and not heading in the actual direction so I have changed it back. Good catch once again!
saintam1 (2020-09-22 08:54:38+00:00): Cool, thanks! Keep up the good work
bikingaround244 (2022-09-24 14:53:44+00:00): Dalton St. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813340306/history#map=19/42.34568/-71.08424) you marked as foot=no and bicycle=no. That is not true. I am changing it
Glassman (2020-09-19 05:16:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91134154
pio2_122 (2020-09-19 08:17:50+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniasz sposób tagowania przystanków łącząc węzeł z tagiem "highway=bus_stop" z węzłem drogi?
Dotychczas wszystkie przystanki w Wałczu były oznaczone jako "highway=bus_stop" w miejscu, gdzie jest fizycznie przystanek - czyli po bokach dróg.
Metoda, którą zastosowałeś uniemożliwia rozpoznanie kierunku w którym jest umieszczony przystanek...

Jeśli chcesz stosować bardziej poszerzone tagowanie z "public_transport=*" itp., to kieruj się wytycznymi z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Buses

A mówią one, że znacznik highway=bus_stop należy należy łączyć z miejscem oznaczonym jako public_transport=platform (czyli fizyczną pozycją przystanku), a nie z public_transport=stop_position (czyli miejscem zatrzymania pojazdu).

Postaram się to naprawić. Ten komentarz można uznać jako uwagę na przyszłość.
Z góry dzięki za zrozumienie!
sznik (2020-09-20 09:55:51+00:00): Ok. Przepraszam za zamieszanie.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:10:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91134495
trapicki (2022-01-05 20:59:23+00:00): Schöne Tour, kann sie aber weder online mehr finden noch hab ich sie markiert gesehen. Wird die Tour noch von jemandem aktiv angeboten als geführte Tour?
Sollte die Tour nicht mehr Substanz haben als ein Tourenvorschlag bei outdooractive, dann hat die IMHO keine Relevanz für OpenStreetMap, noch dazu würde das zu einer zirkularen Referenz zwischen outdooractive und OSM führen.
tordans (2021-11-11 13:04:25+00:00): Hallo FA-KW! Vorschlag für das Tagging von maxspeed and den living_streets wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23916151/history
Statt einer Note, könnten diese Tags etwas standardisierter die Situation erklären:

1. maxspeed:note=Implizit Schrittgeschwindigkeit durch Verkehrsberuhigten Bereich
2. maxspeed:source=DE:living_street (vgl. Tabelle unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed)
tordans (2021-11-11 13:05:05+00:00): (Sorry, natürlich `source:maxspeed=DE:living_street`
datendelphin (2020-09-22 18:06:58+00:00): Noch zwei kleine Hinweise zu diesem changeset: Parklplatz im Namen finde ich hier überflüssig. Das objekt besagt das ja schon, dass das ein Parkplatz ist. Bitte keine Abkürzungen (Kath), immer ausschreiben. Und hier hast du wieder etwas doppelt eingetragen: den nördlichen Parkplatz gibt es als Punkt und als Fläche, bitte darauf achten, dass es nur ein mal drin ist. Also Punkt löschen wenn es die Fläche gibt. Und eine Bitte: etwas aussagekräftigere Changeset Kommentare. z.B. Parkplatz ergänzt. 

Grüsse 
Michael
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-06-09 03:02:38+00:00): Hi,  AlejandroAlba.
I've modified this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/849045887) based on Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Bing; and Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta due to warning crossing highways. Thank you!
Diego Krein (2020-09-18 23:29:02+00:00): Hola Agustin_56, mi nombre es Diego y soy de Misionero.  Si sos de la zona de Aristóbulo del Valle, me gustaría hacerte un par de consultas y poder cargar las numeraciones de calles.

Les dejo una guía sencilla de como funciona Openstreetmap: https://learnosm.org/es/
Te invito a ingresar a este grupo/canal de Telegram donde podrán charlar con otros colaboradores y sacarse todas las dudas: https://t.me/osm_ar. Donde hay gente de todo el país.

Saludos.
smootheFiets (2020-12-06 21:07:46+00:00): De gebouwen van onderstation "110kV Erica" zijn gesloopt, ik heb ze net van de kaart verwijdert. Is de hele station weg? Ik laat dit liever aan jou over, wil niks stuk maken (en heb geen verstand van het hoogspanningsnet).
Groetjes, smootheFiets
A67-A67 (2020-12-06 21:59:53+00:00): Ik had de hoogspanningslijn naar Erica al op 0 Volt gezet, omdat het station volgens TenneT niet meer bestond. Aangezien het nu ook in werkelijkheid is gesloopt, kan het verwijderd worden.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:10:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91137624
HedgiePT (2020-09-19 02:25:35+00:00): Adicionei a rotunda imediatamente a oeste da estação.
yadathot (2020-09-19 02:39:42+00:00): Added Residential Roads as per Private Maxar imagery.
dvdhoven (2020-09-19 07:50:55+00:00): Wil je per direct stoppen met het doorverbinden van wegen?
Ik heb nu 1 fietsroute, 1 wandelroute en 2 busroutes hersteld.
Routes moeten kunnen afslaan en daarvoor moeten wegen doorgeknipt blijven.
Aub nogmaals stoppen met doorverbinden het is nergens voor nodig en alleen maar schadelijk

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2020-09-19 08:38:44+00:00): PB gestuurd
Eggie
pitdicker (2020-09-19 11:10:53+00:00): Beste Dick,

Bedankt voor het bericht en excuses. Ik was me wel bewust van het belang van routes, maar ben hierin fout gegaan. Nogmaals sorry, en bedankt voor het herstellen! Ik probeer het niet nogmaals te doen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Paul Dicker
eggie (2020-09-19 11:18:16+00:00): PB contact
naveenpf (2020-09-22 09:06:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91139397
Leo Slager (2020-09-21 08:15:15+00:00): Dag stroet43,
Met deze manier van mappen beschadig je de multipolygoon. Nu kleurt dus de hele polder niet meer. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd zodat de Floris Schouten Vrouwenpolder nu weer netjes op de kaart staat.
In dit soort gebieden kun je niet zomaar een vlak gaan toevoegen. 
Eerst bepalen hoe de multipolygoon in elkaar zit en daarna pas een verandering doorvoeren.
Hier kun je zien hoe fout dat kan gaan:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.54511&lat=52.22347&zoom=15&opacity=0.81
Leo Slager (2020-09-21 19:41:04+00:00): reverted with my changeset 91247070
Glassman (2020-09-19 15:44:31+00:00): We typically tag bays and coves as natural=bay. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay. A larger example can be found on the other side of the island, Rudlin Bay. 

BTW - Much of the island is already tagged as a park.

The cove can be mapped as a node as you did or an area. Rudlin Bay is a good example of how to map it as an area.

Can you fix the tagging? Let me know if you need help.
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:53:24+00:00): Hi YT1989, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
YT1989 (2020-09-22 01:23:16+00:00): I intended to be an unsaved draft.
Can I delet it?
Ropino (2023-04-21 10:43:54+00:00): Hi,
Kannst du dir bitte den way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849081913
noch mal anschauen: Adresse an Straße + "note" passen nicht so ganz zusammen.
alan1209 (2023-04-28 16:56:08+00:00): Hi, beim damaligen Teilen der Linie ist mir nicht aufgefallen, dass da so konfuses Zeug drin stand. Ist jetzt gelöscht.
eggie (2020-09-19 08:34:36+00:00): Beste Pitdicker,

Svp geen wegen doorverbinden. Het brengt schade toe aan de routerelaties die over de wegen liggen. wellicht ben je er niet van bewust.
Ook heeft doorverbinden geen enkel voordeel alleen maar nadelen.
MVG,
Eggie
pitdicker (2020-09-19 11:13:36+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Via de andere twee reacties is je boodschap me duidelijk geworden, maar ik ben nog even benieuwd: had deze wijziging ook schade aangebracht?
eggie (2020-09-19 11:35:55+00:00): ook hier heeft Dick vd Hoven de relaties hersteld. Klik maar op één van je wegen die je hebt bewerkt in het venster hieronder. 
Je kunt geen routerelaties bewerken met een simpele editor als iD. Dat kan wel met iD.

Herstel door DvdHoven
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843616643

Routerelaties kun je alleen goed bewerken met editor JOSM. Een aanrader.
Even los van het feit dat doorverbinden eigenlijk geen goed idee is.
Routerelaties worden doorlopend gemonitord met een speciale tool.
Er wordt je overigens verder niets kwalijk genomen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-19 11:37:46+00:00): Zie https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/
Wel inloggen om je aanpassingen te bekijken.
eggie (2020-09-19 11:39:04+00:00): https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/networks/nl/rcn
pitdicker (2020-09-19 11:43:19+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips en links, erg nuttig. JOSM heb ik ergens rond 2012 wel gebruikt, ik ga me er weer in verdiepen!
eggie (2020-09-19 11:45:48+00:00): Top!
eggie (2020-09-19 11:48:01+00:00): typo... Dat kan wel met JOSM, maar dat had je al begrepen.
b-jazz (2020-09-19 16:27:33+00:00): Thanks wwhide for fixing up the paths. I've changed the building=yes to be building=roof to indicate there are no walls. Does that sound good to you?
tastrax (2020-10-03 00:42:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
naveenpf (2020-09-23 01:32:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91140484
literan (2020-09-29 10:20:21+00:00): зачем вы удалили кусок Егорьевского шоссе? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575610054/history

будьте аккуратнее
Evgeny Printsev (2020-09-29 10:24:22+00:00): Спасибо, случайно.
Я проставлял ограничение скорости.
Буду внимательней.
NeOtic01 (2020-09-19 08:00:12+00:00): 공사예정지 표기를 미리한 것이 문제가 있는 건가요?
토지보상작업도 시작한 것으로 알고 있어 맵핑했습니다.
NeOtic01 (2020-09-19 08:01:54+00:00): 메세지를 늦게 보았습니다. 알려주신 것 참고하겠습니다.
skquinn (2020-09-19 06:44:04+00:00): Addresses/resolves note 366510
sovereign_ch (2020-09-19 12:07:24+00:00): Auch hier nochmals die Mahnung zu mehr Vorsicht: mit Ausnahme der PV, sind alle anderen Änderungen Fehlverschiebungen/-zusammenfügungen von Knoten.
BCNorwich (2020-09-19 08:31:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few observations of your new mapping. 

It's usual for a highway=path to be mapped as a lineal rather than an area feature, with a width if desired. An area highway should be tagged as area:highway=path, but in these circumstances this would be unusual. Better that paths highways are linear features.

Please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
The greens and fairways are features of the course and as such are classed as an amenity rather than a landuse so the surface=grass tag is used to describe grass areas. Landuse=grass is usually an area used to grow a crop of grass, natural=grass is an area that usually grass is allowed to grow naturally, a meadow. Grass on a golf course is managed usually to facilitate the sport.

Regards Bernard.
opendcc (2020-09-19 20:45:49+00:00): Ist die B299 jettz scon gesperrt oder erst ab 22.9.?
woody-soft (2020-09-20 09:17:28+00:00): Ab 22.9. ist die B299 von Atenmarkt nach Trostberg gesperrt. Montag kannste noch durchradeln :)
Dafür kommt man nun wieder ohne weite Umwege von Obing nach Traunstein.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-22 06:25:04+00:00): Dzięki za zdjęcie, to bardzo pomaga zwłaszcza przy nieco wątpliwych przypadkach!
km2bp (2020-09-22 12:21:45+00:00): Nie ma problemu 1 zdjęcie zastępuje 1000 słów . Szkoda tylko że. Jedyną mobilną aplikacją wyświetlającą zdjęcia które dodaję  jest OSMand . Nie zbyt go lubię.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:26:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91142323
gscscnd (2020-09-19 10:11:34+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/537996574/history>?
*abq* (2020-10-03 15:33:51+00:00): Hi Danbag,
the last part of the trail to Cima Corte Lorenzo is T4, despite the chains. Please check hikr.org, there is consensus on this.
Best regards, Reiner
*abq* (2020-10-04 08:18:15+00:00): Unfortunately, Danbag has answered to me per Email with copies of the SAC scale description, but I would like to keep the discussion here, where it belongs.

Hi Danbag, 
I am very much familiar with the SAC scale and the scales beyond (climbing and mountaneering) and I am regularly doing T1 to T6 hikes. I also know many of the reference trails of the SAC scale.
A commonly accepted reference trail for the grade T3+ is the Lisengrat to Säntis/Alpstein. The last stretch from Carbunisc to Cima Corte Lorenzo has several parts (partly equipped with chains) that are clearly beyond the Lisengrat.This is for instance the descent from Carbunisc, and in particular the traverse over the rock slabs in the following saddle and the last traverse over the rock slabs after the last saddle before the summit. These sections are therefore above T3+, hence in the T4 range.
If you feel that this does not correspond to your ratings on other trails in Val Grande, as you stated in your email, you should reconsider your ratings there.
Please keep in mind, that SAC scale is intended to be a generally applicable grading system, defined not only via verbal description, but also reference trails. There is no special "regional interpretation" of the SAC scale for Val Grande. By the way, from the hikes that I know in Val Grande (in this region covering grades up to upper T5, as e.g. Cima Sasso to Cima Nord), I did not get the feeling that the ratings were off except for this particular hike here.
Best regards,
Reiner