piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2017-10-04 01:51:26+00:00): The address should go on the point - I added it.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-04 12:47:37+00:00): Hello Gage Parker. At 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529820793
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3388694207
you have introduced the new keys `44kv` and `44kv line`. I think it should be `power=tower`/`power=line` and `voltage=44000`, right? Please have a look at 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dline
#newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:51:17+00:00): Hello linerider. You have tagged
`parking:lane:`. Which side? Please have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
linerider (2017-10-09 20:24:07+00:00): Sorry, it seems i was fooled by auto completion. It was supposed to be parking:lane:both. I will correct it now.
Nakaner (2017-10-15 22:11:34+00:00): Hi JRichardson,

please pause this import and read my posting on the Imports mailing list. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005183.html

Could you please add a note to the profile of this account whom this account belongs to?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2017-10-19 10:21:19+00:00): Hi JRichardson,

my first message is now four days ago. I hoped that you start fixing your import on your own without being asked directly.

Could you please fix your import until 2017-10-21 20:00 UTC? Otherwise I will revert your part of the import because people rely on the quality of OSM and low-quality imports like yours don't help OSM.

Best regards

Michael
JRichardson (2017-10-19 14:28:02+00:00): I need to meet more with Vivek about this since I do not know what data you are referring to. Please revert my import since I have no idea how to fix what your asking me to.
mikelmaron (2017-10-19 16:49:41+00:00): @Nakaner -- You are not in position to demand fixes and threaten reverts. We do not deal with each other in this way in our community -- we work with each other to make a better map, in good faith. From what I can see, your concerns are understood, discussion is happening, and things are moving.
If you have an issue with this, please take it up officially with the DWG.
JRichardson (2017-10-19 16:58:20+00:00): I am very sorry about my previous choice of words, did not mean to sound as a threat or a demand and I am more than happy to work with the community. I will work on fixing my imports when I can fix them properly. Again I am very sorry about my choice of words and did not mean to offend.
mikelmaron (2017-10-19 17:13:13+00:00): @JRichardson -- sorry for the confusion. my comment was absolutely not directed towards you, but to @Nakaner
3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import (2017-10-19 17:30:27+00:00): JRichardson is contributing in part of the project :
#osmus-project-127 http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/127.  This specific changeset seems to be partially in line with the import but he converted some stoplines to zebra crossings which aren't great and we shall fix.  Hopefully this conversation should continue in: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005185.html
Nakaner (2017-10-19 18:13:05+00:00): I also prefer to continue the discussion on the mailing list and will post my response there.
CupIvan (2017-10-10 16:05:43+00:00): Эти дорожки необходимо тегировать как highway=service, но никак не tertiary (крупные дороги в микрорайоне), посмотрите пожалуйста рекомендации на страничке https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
Eduard Popov (2017-10-04 03:30:04+00:00): Добро пожаловать в OSM! Так как присутствует тег building=kindergarten, то в name эта информация не нужна, в тег name заносится имя собственное, если вы знаете название детского сада. Также точка на левом ребре здания кажется лишней.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:35:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
Eduard Popov (2017-10-04 03:38:24+00:00): Как и в случае с детским садом, здесь так же по аналогии, тег name нужно либо убрать, либо заполнить именем собственным, если вы его знаете.
Ещё у вас комментарии к правкам неинформативные, это затрудняет другим картографам понимать ваши правки.
Советую ознакомиться с информацией для новичков https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10206.
Приятного картирования!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
user_5359 (2017-10-07 14:29:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dzoo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
aharvey (2017-10-05 13:36:15+00:00): Hey mate,

I think it's better to not snap things like parks, parking etc to the road, and instead try to mark out the exact extent which doesn't normally extend out until the road center line.

If for cartographic reasons that effect is desired it's better to do that as a post processing step on top of OSM.

Cheers.
Maradona11 (2017-10-06 00:40:25+00:00): hi mate,

yeah I attend to agree with that we should be marking out exact extent of a feature in most cases.  However, I find better to snap non-routeable objects (exlude buildings) to the road centre line as it is much more visual appealing when looking at map tiles generated from osm data from major suppliers such as mapbox and carto.  For that reason I think it adds more value to the osm product snapping the non-routeable features like this. 
Is there any reason (rules, common practice) why it cant be snapped to the road centre line?
aharvey (2017-10-06 01:20:02+00:00): Check out:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/17501/when-mapping-polygons-surrounded-by-streets-should-they-share-nodes-or-be-traced-separately

And http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes 
"...when the way is a highway, it usually is most accurate to include a gap, so that the area ends by the side of the road and does not share nodes with the road's way. This is because highway ways usually are traced along the center line of the road, and it is unlikely that the area being tagged actually extends to the center of the road."

I've found from experience areas snapped to the road make future editing more difficult as you need to consider both features, and ungluing is difficult, especially when trying to retain object histories.

Also it's not an accurate representation of reality. Anyone using OSM to say determine the area of that parking lot will get incorrect results if it extents out to the road center line.

I know it's tempting but it's well accepted to not map for the renderer http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer

It's better for data consumers to post-process the data to extend areas which are close to the road, all the way to the road rather than having the source data in OSM do this.

That said, I think that on most maps I've seen, since the the width of the road as rendered on the map is usually wider than a the true width of the road even if the area isn't snapped it appears to extend to the road anyway, simply because of the width of the rendered road line.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
snigdhap (2019-02-27 05:48:17+00:00): "Hi Yunita sari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 500815405 classified as 'Unclasified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
chung333 (2017-10-04 04:25:02+00:00): Wrong comment above. Sorry, the stream is edited to align the one found on the aerial image.
daganzdaanda (2018-04-20 21:13:36+00:00): This changeset only contained orphaned nodes, without tags and not part of a way or relation. I reverted this with changeset 58276371
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
daganzdaanda (2018-04-20 21:07:07+00:00): This changeset only contained orphaned nodes, without tags and not part of a way or relation. I reverted this with changeset 58276214
paulmach (2017-10-10 18:23:12+00:00): please don't add fake data to the map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
pacman541 (2017-10-04 06:42:02+00:00): Почему номер дома по Резинстроя 2 поменяли на 2/16 ?
daganzdaanda (2018-04-20 21:05:54+00:00): This changeset only contained orphaned nodes, without tags and not part of a way or relation. I reverted this with changeset 58275886
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
user_5359 (2017-10-07 06:12:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
daganzdaanda (2018-04-20 20:56:51+00:00): This changeset only contained orphaned nodes, without tags and not part of a way or relation. I reverted this with the changeset 58273832
pacman541 (2017-10-04 06:39:39+00:00): День добрый!
Чтобы сделать углы здания прямыми, нажимайте клавишу "S" в английской раскладке
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 10:29:20+00:00): Hello Jack the Ripper. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127197
you have tagged 
`-=1` instead of
`layer=1`, right? #typo
Jack the Ripper (2017-10-05 15:24:47+00:00): Very much a typo.  Thanks for pointing it out, although it looks like someone else has already fixed that one.  I did find another typo of mine, that I've corrected.
aharvey (2017-10-05 13:14:30+00:00): Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77083928/history landuse=grass?

Could you explain the motives behind deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1515434/history#map=16/-33.9956/151.1453 ? Thanks.
Wilson Yung (2017-10-05 22:05:15+00:00): ah...I think it's an accident..what I was trying to do is remove the duplicate "cook Park" name at -34.004397, 151.129002, as there is a "cook park" near by at -33.995383, 151.145602.
aharvey (2017-10-05 23:48:29+00:00): The whole area is referred to as "Cook Park" all the way from up near Kyeemagh down to at least Sandringham.

The south part near Captain Cook Bridge I think is un-signposted so simply landuse=grass. If you've confirmed it's not part of Cook Park, then simply removing http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77083928 from the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1515434/history is the way to go, not actually deleting the way.

I surveyed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75392223 a long time ago and it was signposted as "Peter Depena Reserve" part of "Cook Park", hence it was part of the Cook Park relation.

I'd like to revert this changeset to reinstate "Peter Depena Reserve" and then remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77083928/history from the Cook Park relation and change it to landuse=grass. Is that what your intention was? Did you want to do this, or would you like me to do the revert?
Wilson Yung (2017-10-06 01:42:05+00:00): Yes that;s my intention. I'll leave you to it as you have surveyed there. :)
aharvey (2017-10-06 02:37:10+00:00): I've reverted this changeset. In the iD or JOSM editor, if you change the background imagery to LPI Base Map you'll see the part near Captain Cook Bridge is labelled Cook Park. This lines up with what I saw in out of copyright historical maps of the area. It's just there is no signage... so I don't mind either way if the name is left there or not. But either way it's still a grassy area so should either be leisure=park or landuse=grass or something like that.
aharvey (2017-10-04 12:01:46+00:00): Hi Miles,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. However it appears you've used a copyrighted source of data here which we don't have a license to use. Could you please post back any details I'm missing?
Chris Fleming (2017-10-04 16:00:10+00:00): Hi Graeme - thanmks for signing up to OSM. It would be really useful if you could add some more details. Ideallty I would suggest adding the outline of the building as well as the full postal address. Also I would add office=photographer

Please let me know if you have any more questions.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
user_5359 (2017-10-07 06:04:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add object twice! Example Line 529874866 and Node 5146685598.
pacman541 (2017-10-04 06:47:13+00:00): День добрый!
К номерам домов неплохо бы и название улицы добавлять, в отдельном поле.
raito (2017-10-12 11:49:07+00:00): Fixed self-intersecting ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52857570
user_5359 (2017-10-07 05:58:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have move your information from the additional line (nearly the some as the building) to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5153026781.

For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2017-10-07 05:48:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
user_6110846 (2017-10-21 11:59:30+00:00): Прохання. Окрім name   дублюйте назву у name:uk    чи інша мова з мов СРСР.   Виловлено проблеми з рендерінґом мов у похідних від цього проекту сервісах
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 11:22:03+00:00): Hello vibrog. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146740899
you have tagged 
`Sørlihavna sykkelpark`. What is it for?
Please keep in mind: keys should be in english ;-)
vibrog (2017-10-06 13:31:29+00:00): The typo was quite obvious wasn't it? Thanks for pointing it out.
pacman541 (2017-10-04 07:08:52+00:00): Добрый день!
Чтобы сделать углы здания прямыми нажимайте клавишу "S" в английской раскладке
Cascafico (2017-10-04 07:43:02+00:00): Ciao.

Il telefono meglio in formato internazionale... Aggiungi +39 e spazio
user_6110846 (2017-10-21 11:56:32+00:00): Перевірте всі правки де є Чуднівсткого броду  . Помилка у суфіксі ---стк--- . Може треба Чуднів(СЬК)ий , ого ? Чи Чуднівцького ?
user_5359 (2017-10-07 05:46:49+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
R0bst3r (2017-10-04 19:46:54+00:00): Hallo Noergel,
dir ist bewusst, dass die Daten von ostalbmap.de unter Copyright stehen und du damit wahrscheinlich eine Urheberrechtsverletzung begehst?
Viele Grüße
Noergel (2017-10-04 19:57:51+00:00): Hallo.
Mir ist nicht bekannt das Orts- oder Gewannnamen unter Urheberrecht stehen. Dies sind Informationen die man aus jeder anderen Karte auch entnehmen kann.

Viele Grüße
Noergel
R0bst3r (2017-10-05 11:44:01+00:00): Und hier liegt das Problem, übernehmen darfst du nicht, auch wenn die Namen nicht geschützt sind, die Daten sind es schon. OSM hat keine Freigabe dafür. Du darfst aber gerne vor Ort aufnehmen und ggf in einer anderen Karte überprüfen.
Alternative wäre z.B. Maps4BW, dafür haben wir in OSM die Erlaubnis bekommen.
Noergel (2017-10-05 15:56:06+00:00): Hallo,
okay. Ich verstehe es zwar noch immer nicht ganz... aber egal.
Wie soll man den vor Ort an Namen kommen und in welcher anderen Karte soll ich das überprüfen? Hat jemand beim Landratsamt schon einmal nachgefragt ob die damit ein Problem haben wenn man Namen aus der Karte in andere Karten übernimmt? Soll ich die Einträge nun löschen?
R0bst3r (2017-10-05 16:40:10+00:00): Gibts eine zweite, legale Quelle? Vor Ort Tafeln, oder Jäger fragen, Opa und Oma? Ich hab in den legalen Karten des Landes nichts gefunden.
Im Zweifel löschen.

Bsp warum Namen übernehmen aus nur einer Quelle ohne Erlaubnis problematisch sein kann: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Copyright_Easter_Eggs
user_5359 (2017-10-07 05:42:50+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
d3d9 (2017-10-04 14:30:20+00:00): Bitte nicht so. Tunnel ist mapping fürn Renderer, weil das so vor Ort nicht stimmt. Bitte mach so etwas nicht.
d3d9 (2017-10-04 14:30:43+00:00): Tipp: covered=yes an der Str. stimmt eher, sieht auch für dich bestimmt gut aus
d3d9 (2017-10-04 14:31:04+00:00): Und woher kommt der Bindestrich und das Leerzeichen im Namen? Wieder Mapping für den Renderer?
d3d9 (2017-10-05 17:52:53+00:00): Ich sehe gerade, nicht einmal covered darf in dem Fall benutzt werden. Naja. Ich fixe jetzt mal name und tunnel
geoaria (2017-11-12 14:26:16+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز  
واقعا اشکالات بسیاری در بهارستان داریم ، خیلی خیلی پر اشتباه بوده اید
از شما خواهش می کنم دیگه به اینصورت ویرایش نکنید  ، خیلی از مسیر های بدون اینکه تقاطع تشکیل دهند از روی هم رده شده اند . خیلی اتصالات میدادین انجام نشده .  ورودی بهارستان  یک باند را بصورت غلط و طولانی پل ترسیم کرده اید . در حالی که فقط یک قسمت کوچک به صورت زیرگذر هست   و .....
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 10:52:54+00:00): Hello willbplunbing (misspelling?). At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146806209
you have incorrectly tagged `Pyment` and `opening_hours`.
Please have a loot at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
4004 (2017-10-06 21:35:20+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
если проезд там и правда есть, то почти все хорошо. Замечания: не уверен, что там и правда только этот проезд. Плюс, такие (глухие) дороги обозначаются как service,
РоманС (2017-10-09 07:22:38+00:00): Я там живу. Езжу каждый день. Навигация ведет не верно
4004 (2017-10-09 22:02:24+00:00): вы можете очень хорошо знать местность, но осм это прежде всего база данных, где все должно быть отмечено соответствующим образом. если ваши отметки соответсвуют реальности, то отлично. то, как ведет навигация, это обычно проблема навигации а не карты
РоманС (2017-10-10 07:41:18+00:00): Я редактировал маршрут так как есть на самом деле. Ранее отсутствовал 1 проезд и не правильно был прорисован проезд. Я это исправил
4004 (2017-10-12 21:25:39+00:00): отлично, спасибо
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 12:17:02+00:00): Hello alessio gardella. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146842141 
you have tagged
`name:Genovese`. 
But Genovese isn't in the list of ISO 639.
Please have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
LordOfMaps (2017-11-04 09:51:30+00:00): Hi, hier kann was nicht passen: Die Hausnummer 47 ist jetzt doppelt vorhanden!
Tiamate (2017-11-04 12:55:38+00:00): ich hab jetzt folgendes geändert (Änderung rückgängig):

Zellbergsheideweg 45->41, 47->45 

es fehlen jetzt: 43 und 39

--------------
ich rate: aus 41 müsste jetzt 43 werden
und aus den 2 Häusern oberhalb von 37: 39 und 41
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 10:49:30+00:00): Hello DHY stone. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146902988
you have tagged 
`Skype` instead of 
`contact:skype`, right? `email` and `linkedin`, too.
Please have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
Sanniu (2017-10-10 06:11:32+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529910453 - is it roundabout?
Sanniu (2017-10-15 09:05:56+00:00): Ping
sivan00 (2017-10-15 09:13:50+00:00): Yes it is.
Sanniu (2017-10-15 09:15:06+00:00): Thx, fixed
BeKri (2017-10-04 14:13:14+00:00): Jo recht hast Du,
aber München ist sich da wohl auch nicht so ganz einig ;-)
http://www.muenchen.de/dienstleistungsfinder/muenchen/1052516/
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 08:23:17+00:00): Hallo Lübeck. Bei
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/68197951
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1240000458
ist dir wohl bei
`ailway:position`
ein `r` abhanden gekommen, oder? ;-) #typo
Supaplex (2018-01-20 00:14:46+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2017-10-04 12:53:45+00:00): не надо ставить кривые адреса на точки POI. Они все равно берутся из контуров домов. Хоть бы посмотрели, как на контуре дома прописано
majkaz (2017-10-04 10:57:36+00:00): Ahoj,
řekla bych, že to smazání bývalého nájezdu přes Borek je omyl. Ta silnice tam pořád ještě je, jen je uzavřená, a označené to bylo správně. Nebo na to snad od toho uzavření najely bagry?
eggie (2017-10-04 21:29:20+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
woodpeck (2017-10-04 10:01:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52244481, 52244523, 52244534, 52244547, 52244561, 52244572, 52244592.