piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2022-02-12 12:54:46+00:00): This crossing has surface=asphalt.  Paving stones are only found on the sidewalk.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=144226131328675

Please be more careful next time because you are putting incorrect data into OSM.
Jan Online (2022-02-21 19:43:24+00:00): Seriously, I appreciate you looking out for me but as far as I see this path doesn't represent the crossing (aka the road) but merely connects the paved beginning of the footpath with the road. Otherwise it would be a path that stops in the middle of the road wouldn't it? So IMO it should be marked with the same paving as the footpath.
SomeoneElse (2024-08-30 08:49:23+00:00): Hello,
It looks like this has made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103563702/history all one long bridge.
I'm guessing that this is not correct?
Best Regards,
Andy
bigalxyz123 (2024-08-31 09:29:28+00:00): Hi Andy. Very odd. Have fixed the tags now so it should be ok.

Regards, Alan
SomeoneElse (2024-08-31 10:20:41+00:00): Great - thanks.
user_6471069 (2022-08-29 19:11:39+00:00): That fire hydrant is not a hostel.
user_2066394 (2022-02-12 16:34:59+00:00): surface=* könnte man  beibehalten?
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-12 12:01:53+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:100];(nwr["name"~"^蜜雪冰城\\(*"][name!="蜜雪冰城"];);out meta;>;out meta qt;

代码类似https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116774289
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-12 12:12:58+00:00): 您可能会想推荐我的文章：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
osmviborg (2022-02-12 14:12:57+00:00): Her ændrer du det rigtige navn på ruten til en beskrivelse af samme.
sba-dk (2022-02-12 14:35:11+00:00): Ikke forstået
osmviborg (2022-02-12 14:51:53+00:00): 'På tur i Bylderup og Lendemark' er en beskrivelse. 'Bylderup - Lendemark' er det du læser i linket, som er navnet på turen.
sba-dk (2022-02-12 15:26:48+00:00): Nu er der jo mange forskellige "navne" på disse 'stisystemer' (løbe- og vandreruter), så jeg har valgt at bruge det navn, som fremgår af turbeskrivelsen, idet det er mest beskrivende. Link'et opfatter jeg som en forkortelse, ikke et navn. - Hvis du mener, at det er forvirrende, så må du tage en snak med Borgerforeningens web-redaktør.
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-12 12:10:19+00:00): amenity=cafe
brand=蜜雪冰城
brand:en=MIXUEBINGCHENG
brand:wikidata=Q107406476
brand:wikipedia=zh:蜜雪冰城
brand:zh=蜜雪冰城
cuisine=bubble_tea
name=蜜雪冰城
name:en=MIXUEBINGCHENG
name:zh=蜜雪冰城
takeaway=yes
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-12 12:13:01+00:00): 您可能会想推荐我的文章：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:37:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1030677240. Did you mean foot:conditional insetad of pedestrians:conditional
Catootje91 (2022-02-18 11:27:09+00:00): Thank you
Best description is
Access:conditional
abakus_uploader (2022-02-12 23:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-02-12 13:35:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Kijk even hier hoe je verder kunt specificeren.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MrMoehritz (2022-03-27 14:07:10+00:00): Wilkommen in Edingen :-P
czebureks (2022-07-11 00:09:08+00:00): Please revert all your changes in which you added non-existent street names in honor of non-existent people.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 23:38:18+00:00): Chyba nigdy tu nie byłeś.
trapicki (2023-11-13 21:38:10+00:00): Der Name eines OpenStreetMap-Objekts soll nicht das Ding beschreiben, dafür haben wir andere Tags. Wenn es keinen eigenen Namen hat, dann halt keinen Namen eintragen; und wenn schon, dass mit korrekter Rechtstreibung (Groß/klein, ss/ß).
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
AlbertCohen (2023-11-14 12:40:09+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die prompte Bearbeitung. 
Wenn es schon Tipps hinsicht der Orthographie gibt, dann sollte diese auch selbst beherrscht werden.
crispytaffy (2022-02-12 13:40:48+00:00): I put the wrong categories of buildings in this set. Corrected with the following set #117321751.
Rhoon (2022-03-30 16:25:15+00:00): gibt es hier (uhlichs weg) wirklich ein neues mehrfamilienhaus? auf den luftbildern ist nichts zu sehen und es gibt auch keinen adresspunkt...
user_2066394 (2022-02-12 21:53:44+00:00): Den könnte man noch ins Haus reinschieben.
Osmrotr (2022-02-12 22:23:56+00:00): Gerne. Wie geht das? Ich habe den Arzt nicht selbst angelegt, sondern nur Angaben ergänzt. Ich kenne mich noch kaum aus.
user_2066394 (2022-02-12 22:29:08+00:00): Grade nachgeschaut, der liegt in der Tat schon seit 2017 da draußen. Ich schiebe mal.
dieterdreist (2022-04-22 09:51:10+00:00): Hi KartoGrapHiti, sehe gerade, dass Deine "Korrekturen des name tags" teilweise bedeuten, dass der name tag komplett entfernt wurde (z.B. "Verwaltungsgebäude"), und dass teilweise zumindest Informationen verloren gegangen sind, z.B. hier wurde "Philosophikum I" komplett unterschlagen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431688653/history
das hätte man gut z.B. in alt_name unterbringen können, oder?
Gruß, Martin
KartoGrapHiti (2022-04-22 15:29:46+00:00): Hi Martin,
"Verwaltungsgebäude" und der Klammerzusatz "Philosophikum I" sind ja keine Namen, sondern Beschreibungen. Es ist ja nicht so, dass ein Gebäude unter dem Namen "Verwaltungsgebäude" bekannt ist, sondern das ist eine Beschreibung. Da sind sich eigentlich alle einig, nur nicht die Person, die im Namen der Uni die Namen vergibt. Das Ganze wurde hier ja diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74922 
Ich werde nun aber alles in official_name ändern und hoffe, dass dann das Thema erledigt ist. Leider diskutiert die Uni im Forum nicht mit. 
Gruß KatoGrapHiti
dieterdreist (2022-04-22 15:54:35+00:00): Hallo KartoGrapHiti,
bei "Verwaltungsgebäude" mag man sich streiten können, das ist sicherlich auch eine Beschreibung, könnte aber lokal auch als Name genutzt werden. Bei "Zugspitze" oder "Düsseldorf" oder lokal z.B. "Alter Friedhof" oder "Kläranlage Gießen" oder "Stadtwerke Gießen" oder "Weststadt" oder "Botanischer Garten" oder "Altes Schloß" stellst Du die Namen ja auch nicht in Frage, obwohl sie auch beschreibenden Charakter haben, oder?
Ich sehe es so, dass "name=Parkbank" oder "name=Telefonzelle" für eine beliebige Parkbank oder Telefonzelle totaler Quatsch ist, aber wenn man sagt wir treffen uns im "Philosophikum I" und alle wissen was gemeint ist, dann ist das ein "Name", und auch "Verwaltungsgebäude" könnte so ein Fall sein (kenne aber die Lage vor Ort nicht, vielleicht ist das auch Käse). Im Zweifel würde ich Namen eher lassen als löschen, außer es sind wirklich glasklar nur Beschreibungen. Zumindest bei Philosophikum I würde ich das bestreiten.
Dass die Uni sich nicht an der Diskussion beteiligt ist wirklich schade, vielleicht kommt das ja noch...
Grüße,
Martin
KartoGrapHiti (2022-04-23 07:57:05+00:00): Bitte lass uns die Diskussion im Forum weiter führen, es geht hier ja nicht um mich, sondern darum, wie die Community das handhabt.
知の巨人 (2022-02-12 14:12:24+00:00): Hi Hausirg,

are you sure that all these power lines by ceyockey do not exist?
-> https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117322316
zluuzki (2022-02-12 20:05:14+00:00): All? I deleted around 5 very small pieces of such lines. It is quite pointless to have such very small unconnected segments lying around, in my opinion
skyper (2022-02-13 16:02:20+00:00): Hi Domme

Kannst Du bitte die verwendeten Quellen im Änderungssatz angeben, danke.
Wenn es sich um die GTFS-Daten der NVBW handelt sollte lizenztechnisch zumindest "Datensatz der NVBW GmbH (https://www.nvbw.de/open-data)" angegeben werden, wie ich es auch in der PTNA Analyse dokumentiert habe.

Als Tipp noch die Erweiterung "pt_assistant", welche einige Fehler wie unterschiedliche Tags der route_master Relation und ihrer Mitglieder wie auch Lücken in den route Relationen im Validator beanstandet.

LG skyper
PT-53 (2022-08-07 06:39:38+00:00): Hallo Qwave,
Du hast für den Umirß des Feuerwehrgebäudes
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030698201/history
die Merkmale
- building=yes    und
- constrution=yes
verwendet. Im OSM-Inspector wird dafür ein Hinweis "Hidden non-operational tagging" angezeigt:
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.07794&lat=48.52809&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes%2Cnonop_confusion_on_ways

Gem. Wiki sollte
- building=construction
für Gebäude im Bau verwendet werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction?uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
Qwave (2022-08-07 07:40:44+00:00): Habe es verbessert. Dank für den Hinweis.
ottwiz (2022-02-12 14:19:09+00:00): I also added some driveways.
eggie (2022-02-12 15:49:22+00:00): Dag Scoutertje..  Is wellicht de hele Welsummerweg cycleway=shared_lane? Dus fietssuggestiestrook.
MVG
eggie
Scoutertje (2022-02-12 16:51:18+00:00): inderdaad... en zojuist aangepast. groeten.
eggie (2022-02-12 16:53:06+00:00): Top!
simogeo (2022-02-12 14:25:58+00:00): I d'ont know how to fix this warning regarding junctions ...
GOwin (2022-02-12 23:22:33+00:00): Hello @PD2testing! Welcome sa OpenStreetMap (OSM)! Lahat ng edits na iyong gagawin sa OSM, kapag ito'y na-save na ay agarang maitatampok sa mapa. Ika nga ni Yoda, " ... there is no try."  😉

Ang OpenStreetMap(OSM) ay isang plataporma ng pag-mamapa ng sama-sama, at ang lahat ay malayang makapag-a-ambag sa pagpapabuti ng mapa. 

Kung nais mo pa ng karagdagang kaalaman,tingnan ang: https://osm.org/​wiki/​Beginners'_guide o subukan ang mga modyul sa https://learnosm.org. 

Mayroón ding mga online channels ang mga lokal na boluntaryo sa OSM : https://osm.org/wiki/PH
Alex_457 (2022-02-12 23:28:27+00:00): Hi, I can see why you added this but the relation already existed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13382689. The restriction you added will block access from Lawrence Street
Alec Coates (2022-02-13 13:03:52+00:00): Thanks for the spot. My bad.
Alex_457 (2022-02-13 13:05:28+00:00): No worries
H@mlet (2022-02-13 16:29:46+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez dupliqué le nœud au nord du chemin, il y en a maintenant quatre superposés.
Ce n'est probablement pas ce que vous vouliez faire.
Cordialement.
cytryn (2022-02-12 19:54:30+00:00): Hi!
Thanks for the revision, but I'm not sure, if this edit is justified actually. I've done the research before mapping these objects to find out what tags would be the best here. Surprisingly, there are very few skatepark equipment objects mapped explicitly as done here, so the sample for comparison was very limited. However, it can be noted that tagging scheme skatepark:<equipment>=yes is added mostly to leisure=pitch outlines (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724560004) to list all the equipment available in the place. Here, by contrast I wanted to use the scheme which is consistent with tagging of the fitness_station https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station#Fitness_equipment, as well as playground equipment https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground#Playground_equipment Since the scheme I introduced here seems to meet these expectations, I don't think the tagging after this revision is really the better one. Espacially, bearing in mind that in this case "tags already used elsewhere" also means numbers that can be counted on fingers of one hand ;)
mueschel (2022-02-12 20:42:12+00:00): Hi,
all you wrote is perfectly correct. We have the unfortunate situation to have two different tagging schemes for both playground and fitness equipment already. I'm not sure if we should take this as a reason to introduce the same two tagging options to skateparks as well. Having only one option makes it easier to put these to the wiki and convince other mappers to use them on other skateparks... 

If you insist, I'm perfectly fine with reverting these changes.
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 22:26:15+00:00): Hi Glitch-Hunter,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030712552/history
what's the meaning of place=yes?

Multipolygon's inner ways can be left tagless
DressyPear4 (2022-02-14 10:02:32+00:00): Olá, cada elemento possui tag específica, não fique colocando tags aleatórias.
Nesse caso caso você está dizendo que a área é uma via, um campo de golf e uma piscina tudo ao mesmo tempo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117324741
SY0649 (2022-02-15 09:21:38+00:00): 车站内正线的名称仍标记为线名，请自行改回
Vinber-Pro (2023-11-05 15:59:53+00:00): Bonjour Popolon,
je découvre tree:ref et je me demande d'où cela sort ? Tu l'as ajouté par exemple ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636077001/history

Curieux je n'ai pas trouvé sur le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tree:ref?uselang=fr

Peux-tu m'aider, tu es un des rares à avoir ajouté cette ref en france ?

Vincent
user_5359 (2022-02-12 17:08:24+00:00): Hello! Please use the key height instead heigh. I have corrected your typo.
mapperich (2022-02-12 17:37:32+00:00): oh, danke!
user_5359 (2022-02-13 10:18:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1030716342/history . What is the meaning of the tag bagin = park?
toeklk (2024-12-25 20:56:25+00:00): Hi Dominiek82, in this changeset you altered the access rights to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655895078 and set them to private. However, according to https://tragewegen.github.io/trage-wegen-in-je-buurt/?logo=true&lyrs=trw&base=osm&histo=&histTrans=0.5&x=4.653862&y=50.891425&z=17.38 the Kapelleweg (W56) should be accessible here from Brusselsesteenweg (at least for non-motorised traffic).  Are you sure access=private is the correct tag here?  TIA!
martien-176 (2022-02-12 19:32:56+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.  The buildings are well mapped. Good location and outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117326354
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-08 01:36:09+00:00): Please use access restrictions on relevant ways instead.
th0ms (2022-02-16 11:48:02+00:00): This may not be correct: public sources say Wado City is a proposed name given to certain parts of Warri (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wado_City). This need clarifying.
Swaggscoop (2022-02-16 12:25:23+00:00): Wado City is new name of the Urhobos in Warri City and their other neighbouring Urhobo town... People from Warri may not agree with this because it becomes a loss for them which they dont want it to happen. But it has already been achieved .
Wado City include the kingdoms of Warri South, Uvwie, Udu, Okpe, Agbarho and Ughievwen
th0ms (2022-02-16 13:45:01+00:00): If that is the case, then a relation should be created to describe Warri City, in which Wado City and its sub-areas area describes. At the moment, there is no reference to Warri City at all.
Swaggscoop (2022-02-16 20:47:38+00:00): Warri City as claimed to be owned by the Itsekiris , while other indigenous tribes remains tenants in their ancestral land is the issue while the Urhobos decided to disallow crises and violence to mind their own territory.  Wado City has come to stay... All places on Google map has been changed to Wado City . I dont know while its opponent are fighting hard for their neighbours not to live in peace.
th0ms (2022-02-17 09:38:31+00:00): Thanks for the helpful background about the issue. Are there parts of Warri City that you think should not be renamed to Wado City?
Swaggscoop (2022-02-17 09:49:14+00:00): Yes there is a massive location as Warri stand still... Warri generally is made up of 3 tribes. The 3 tribes are Urhobo,  Itsekiri and Ijaw. And each has their territory. But overtime due to politics and other tribalistic reasoning the other tribes decided to claim ownership over the 2 other tribes. There was a time it becomes a war between Itsekiri and Ijaw in the year 1999 and 2001. Ryt now the Itsekiris still claiming ownership of Warri over the Urhobo and Ijaws. So the Urhobos come on with an agreed settlement and renamed all their territories out of Warri , which is now Wado City. Warri City is massive ... The itsekiri and Ijaw towns still remain Warri while the Urhobos towns remain Wado City. Almost every signpost in Wado City have changed their signboard from Warri to Wado City. In a summary the other Mega side still remain Warri City.
Rom1 (2022-02-14 12:03:34+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification. Les données initiales étaient tout à fait correctes. Merci.
Chlc (2022-02-22 11:25:54+00:00): Bonjour,
highway:residential désigne une rue résidentielle dans son entièreté, elle peut-être complété par exemple de sidewalk: both si il y a des trottoirs des deux cotés et ainsi de suite avec tous les attributs.
Cela ne désigne pas une file de voiture sur la route. Le seul cas où nous somme obligé de faire ainsi c'est lors qu'il est nécessaire de cartographier quelque chose en ces deux voies comme par exemple une ligne de tramway. Ce n'est pas le cas ici. C'est une rue à double sens à laquelle on put ajouter tous les attributs idoines.
Je vous laisse rétablir la correction.
Merci.
Rom1 (2022-02-23 10:53:45+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai demandé à l'avis à d'autres sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/representation-rue/8017 et avec une seule réponse (j'imagine que "qui ne dit mot consent" pour les autres) je laisse en l'état ce qui est correct. Merci.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 13:26:41+00:00): Don't tag roads as paths for any reason
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117326773
rskedgell (2023-05-06 18:02:22+00:00): Hi,

You have tagged these roads as being prohibited for pedestrians (foot=no) via the StreetComplete app. I cannot find any evidence of "pedestrians prohibited" signs at either end of these sections.

What is your reason for believing that pedestrians are legally prohibited here, rather than it appearing to be inconvenient, unsafe, or inadvisable?

In OSM, access values describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground truth; e.g., signage or legal ruling and not introduce guesswork.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
watbe (2023-05-06 18:30:50+00:00): Hi, feel free to revert it.

If I remember correctly, the street complete app doesn't exactly get too prescriptive about what criteria accessibility should be assessed against. 

In this situation I think I assumed that pedestrians aren't permitted to walk over a flyover freeway, without a footpath available.
rskedgell (2023-05-06 18:44:52+00:00): No problem, the quest is a bit vague in the UK context.

In other countries, there probably isn't a requirement for explicit signage for pedestrians to be prohibited from using the carriageway on roads like this.

We could do with some way of tagging ways where pedestrians are not actually prohibited, but where no routing software should ever contemplate sending them. That doesn't fit with access tagging as currently documented and I have no idea what would work.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-12 16:47:27+00:00): Hola Cristián. Por favor no usar nombres genéricos. Si el camino no tiene nombre, no se le pone. Pero no se describe algo en el nombre. slaudos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117327991
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 23:07:54+00:00): Ciao Overflow, benvenuto su OSM :)

Gli animali del tag animal_breeding vanno scritti in inglese, come dice la Wiki: "Si usa la forma singolare inglese per una singola categoria o per un insieme di categorie (usare dog e non dogs, bird e non birds)", vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Danimal_breeding
oVeRFLoW-ITA (2022-02-14 07:19:49+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco , ho cambiato il nome degli animali in inglese e singolare, sai perche' su openstreetmap non mi compare il nome dell'azienda ma solo il numero 352?
grazie per l'aiuto
ivanbranco (2022-02-14 14:01:12+00:00): Probabilmente gli allevamenti non vengono renderizzati dalla mappa base di OSM.
user_3022894 (2022-10-16 18:11:47+00:00): Hallo Christoph,
sorry erstmal der Nachfrage, mir ist hier eine Kleinigkeit aufgefallen.

Und zwar, bei den Trafostationen - Kompaktstationen, wie die an der Gräfrather Straße Ecke Rubensstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362437930) eine ist, taggen wir grundsätzlich nicht (zugegeben: nicht mehr) mit "building".

Für "building" braucht es schon ein mannshohes Gebäude mit Eingang bzw. Tür.
Für alle Kompaktstationen, sprich die kleineren Häischen, sind man_made=street_cabinet + street_cabinet=power als Attribute für "Kompaktstation" völlig ausreichend.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:53:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your typo 
heightway=Unclassified
highway=residential (sometimes also added)
SomeoneElse2 (2022-12-14 12:19:22+00:00): Hello,
This looks very much like a mechanical edits.  Can you point to where it was discussed with the wider OSM community?
Best Regards,
Andy
(see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maproulette-request-for-comments-liking-and-flagging-challenges/5838/2 for info)
SomeoneElse2 (2022-12-14 12:20:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Cela ressemble beaucoup à un montage mécanique. Pouvez-vous indiquer où cela a été discuté avec la communauté OSM au sens large ?
Cordialement,
Andy
(voir aussi https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maproulette-request-for-comments-liking-and-flagging-challenges/5838/2 pour info)
zorglubu (2022-12-14 14:00:50+00:00): Hello,
I think I get your point, but I had not and I woudn't consider that as a mechanical edit. I started with translation in french of diplomatic objects when I realized that embassies were (for exemple) tagged amenity=diplomatic or consulates tagged office=embassy. Then I have open different maproulette challenges in order to have contributors to check one by one the objects wtih "embass", "ambass", "consul" in their "name" or "name:fr" tag. and put the tags according to the wiki.
Do you consider as well that systematically adding the country code is a mechanical edit ? Or that, checking the name of the object and, if this is an embassy, replacing office=embassy with office=diplomatic+diplomatic=embassy is a mechanical edit ?
I did myself a good part of the work, often leaving a note asking to check if there is really an embassy or a consulate in this place. I never felt doing an automatic work.

To come back to this changeset named "add diplomatic=embassy + embassy=mission", I remember that I was looking for "name~europe" in diplomatic objects to tag them "mission". Certainly this node nearby :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2651692631
I didn't add "mission" but rather "residence" as suggested by the wiki. Does it look automatic ?
Best regards.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-15 19:01:25+00:00): Looking at the projects linked to from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maproulette-request-for-comments-liking-and-flagging-challenges/5838/5 ,

27058, 26992, 26991, 26976, 26851 and 26850 look like genuine attempts to improve the data.

24298, 24297, 24296 and 24295 look like just trying to change one set of tags for another.

For example, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:diplomatic%3Dhigh_commission is documented as an in-use tag in the OSM database.

The tagging list was contacted https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-January/thread.html#63778 and it was made clear to you that this WAS a mechanical edit.  You ignored this and went ahead anyway.