piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FransWillem (2019-11-06 09:45:32+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping here
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degr angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degr corners


Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the righthand menu?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
This is a building only project.
Please restrict yourself to mapping of buildings.

Best regards and success with future mappings
eggie (2019-11-02 20:42:39+00:00): dijkmeneer. Het zou zo maar kunnen dat ze verkeerd geplaatst zijn want het is een import geweest van communicatiemasten.
Ze zijn er echter wel. Nu heb je ze verwijderd.
Ik draai de changeset even terug.
Die communicatie"toren" zal wel een onderdeel zijn van de lichtmast. Stefan de Konink vond het kennelijk belangrijk om ze op de kaart te hebben. Overleg dan even met Stefan voor je dat allemaal weghaalt. 
Ik draai het even terug. Wanneer je zeker weet dat hier geen communicatiemasten meer staan haal ze dan weg. Overigens staan er dus ook nog de lichtmasten denk ik.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 20:48:18+00:00): reverted by changeset  76537476
gendy54 (2019-12-09 22:27:48+00:00): Ok, par contre, si y une voie distincte pour entrer et sortir il faut les mettre en sens unique (tag oneway) et non avec le tag direction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76535866
al-hadj lamarana djalo (2019-11-11 15:53:37+00:00): manghel
Branko Kokanovic (2019-11-16 15:22:16+00:00): Ovo sto si napisao "100%", jel to znaci da si 100% siguran da je ovako?:) Ima ovaj broj "Булевар патријарха Германа 2" odmah pored zapadnije, jel on treba da ostane broj 2?
gendy54 (2019-12-09 22:26:01+00:00): Obligé de passer par le rond point pour aller tout droit?
SInon RAS
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76536316
user_5359 (2019-11-03 19:42:04+00:00): Halo! Was willst Du uns beim Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59345782 mit dem Tag "(new tag)"="STRABAG" sagen?
foto-graf (2019-11-05 17:26:26+00:00): es hatte "name" wohl nicht angenommen, das 'Gebäude' Stadtjägerstraße 10 (nicht "'Weg') wird nicht mehr von der bisher eingetragenen "Telekom" sondern der österreichischen Bau- u. Immobilien-Fa. Strabag verwaltet und u.a. genutzt. (sh. auch WIKIPEDIA)
NorthIsland (2022-09-03 14:08:29+00:00): Hi. The path between Kingway shops and ASDA is segregated along some of the route alongside the rec. Not sure which bits. And well done for calling this a 'Path' - few Kingsway paths are signed as cycle routes - but most are NOT signed as 'cycling prohibited' - and most cyclists bike on all of them!
IpswichMapper (2020-10-18 20:58:51+00:00): The path doesn't connect to anything on the south side. I did it from looking at the Bing imagery, but make sure you properly connect up the path next time. 

Also, where did you get the name of this path?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/76536998
ma-rt-in (2019-11-03 13:22:23+00:00): Hallo,
ich vermute mal das dein name für die Felswände doch eher eine Beschreibung sind als ein EIGENname.
Bitte korrigiere es und nutze description=* dafür oder material=red_sandstone
vg
FredrikLindseth (2019-11-07 08:36:08+00:00): Hi MarlinMr. You should put som more effort into drawing houses. Make the squares right and possibly divide the long line of  houses up in separate houses. 
With the ID-editor(which you used in the browser) you can press S to make buildings completely square. 
These houses doesnt look good as they are now :p
FredrikLindseth (2019-11-07 08:36:40+00:00): Så Johan kommenterte på et annet changesett ja. Happy mapping videre!
MarlinMr (2019-11-07 08:39:42+00:00): Er dere en norsk gjeng som jeg burde joine eller?
MarlinMr (2019-11-07 08:40:52+00:00): Og liten kommentar, de husene der er litt rare irl. De henger faktisk sammen.
FredrikLindseth (2019-11-07 08:42:18+00:00): Vi er en gjeng som henger på IRC på kanalen #osm-no, kan joine via webchat her https://webchat.oftc.net/?channels=osm-no
Carnildo (2019-11-04 09:06:19+00:00): Looks pretty good.

I see one mistake: your crosswalks are all free-floating, not connected to the rest of the road network.  This means that drivers won't get alerted to the crosswalks.

This is easy to fix in iD (the in-browser editor that you're using).  Simply click on one of the crosswalks you created, open the "Issues" section on the left if it's not already open, and click "Connect the features".  Repeat for the rest of the crosswalks.
Carto'Cité (2019-11-08 09:40:16+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.

J'ai mis les pistes cyclables en sens unique autour du rond-point au croisement des rues de Bagneux et Barry Tricard. J'ai aussi supprimé le tag cycleway=track devenu redondant sur https://www.osm.org/way/666960584 : il n'y a pas de piste cyclable côté est, si ?

J'ai une question : la section immédiatement au sud de la rue de Bagneux (https://www.osm.org/way/666960480) a-t-elle vraiment des pistes cyclables de chaque côté ? On ne voit rien de tel sur la BD Ortho...

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
_Mathieu_ (2019-11-08 09:45:48+00:00): Bonjour,
- Sur le premier : non, pas de piste cyclable côté est, j'avais loupé le tag cycleway=track sur la route, merci :)
- Sur le second : non, je n'ai vu aucune piste à cet endroit, quel que soit le côté

Bonne journée,

Mathieu
Carto'Cité (2019-11-08 10:01:33+00:00): Ok j'ai enlevé le tag cycleway=track.
Merci !
eggie (2019-11-02 21:30:00+00:00): Je plakt hier de wegen aan de landuse grass vast. Dat is eigenlijk niet gewenst. Nu doen ze dat in Duitsland wel meer maar daar zijn grote vraagtekens bij te zetten. Liever niet doen dus.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 21:31:01+00:00): De kaart wordt onwerkbaar voor andere mappers.
eggie (2019-11-02 21:33:25+00:00): Ik draai de changeset terug. Dit is gewoon lappen grasland willekeurig overal neermappen.
Niet de bedoeling.
eggie (2019-11-02 21:34:32+00:00): revetiert durch changeset #76538421
eggie (2019-11-02 21:39:20+00:00): Beste dijkmeneer. Wanneer je zo doorgaat willekeurig in Duitsland en Frankrijk gewoon lappen landuse neer te poten zonder enig plan zou je wel eens in problemen kunnen komen met de lokale mappers daar. 
Niet alles gaat namelijk goed. 
Die doen dan een melding bij de DWG DataWorkingGroup. 
Edits van startende mappers worden gevolgd.
Lees nog eens de tips in de welkomstmail. Beperk je in het begin in je edits. Maak werk van een stukje landuse. Dit gaat een beetje op de olifant in de poseleinkast lijken.
Gr eggie
dijkmeneer (2019-11-02 21:43:44+00:00): oké ik zal het niet meer doen

Dijkmeneer
eggie (2019-11-02 21:44:55+00:00): Landuse farmland disconnected from roads
elgolfo (2020-05-15 14:58:21+00:00): Hi dietziSon,

das Tagging macht so keinen Sinn.

fire_hydrant:diameter kann nicht 0 sein, sonst wäre da kein Rohr dran.
fire_hydrant:type=suction_point  gibt es nicht, das wäre fire_hydrant:type=pipe und fire_hydrant:pressure=suction wenn ein Brunnen gemeint ist.
Was hast du mit fire_hydrant:type=water_tank gemeint? Unterflurhydranten vielleicht?

Grüße
Moritz
elgolfo (2020-05-18 10:17:09+00:00): Mit welcher App oder, falls ohne, wie hast du die Hydranten erfasst?
mueschel (2019-11-03 08:50:40+00:00): Hi,
what does the tag ABF-FID mean? If this is a reference number of the city, it should be in a "ref:*" tag. If it is not necessary, it should be removed.

And: There is no need to give the height of a building to sub-millimeter precision. That's at least two digits more than anyone could reasonably measure.
david12345 (2019-11-03 13:45:33+00:00): Fair enough. I'll get both issues corrected.
Thank you.
freebeer (2019-11-10 09:51:51+00:00): also, it looks as if you are running a custom script or utility, as the changeset tag
   created_by David Nicholson
appears to refer to your own name, i'm guessing, rather than to identify the particular trackable source-code of the data (like Acme Fix-o-bot v.003644).
david12345 (2019-11-10 21:02:46+00:00): It's my own program. no name for it. I will publish it on GitHub once I it's done with Airdrie.
Commodoortje (2021-06-27 19:19:16+00:00): aanbevelingen via pb verzonden.
VRT OSM (2021-06-27 19:31:48+00:00): Dank je wel Commodoortje, ik ga het aanpassen.
mvg Mike
eggie (2019-11-02 22:12:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 22:18:39+00:00): Piet.. je bedoeling is uiteraard goed, maar. ...
OSM lijkt zo simpel, maar is verre van dat. Dit zal niet routeren.
Heb je rekening gehouden met de busroutes?  Ik vermoed van niet. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76538849#map=19/52.18985/5.62098&layers=T
Wanneer je access=no tagt zal het allemaal niet routeren. De constructiontags staan er nog steeds op. 

Hoe gaan de fietsers nu? Is dat ook klaar? 
Dit waren je edits. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76538849

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 22:37:52+00:00): De rotonde heb ik voor nu routeerbaar gemaakt. De minirotonde op de node verwijderd. Accesstags aangepast en de wegenklasse. 
De busroutes gaat meer tijd vergen om  weer goed te krijgen
eggie (2019-11-02 23:07:19+00:00): De busroutes die onderbroken waren heb ik hersteld.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 23:16:37+00:00): name=Apeldoornsestr verwijderd.
Dat hoort niet op een rotonde.
eggie (2019-11-02 23:25:27+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. 
Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen.
Gr eggie
PT-53 (2020-01-09 09:24:06+00:00): Hallo rene78,
nach Deinen Bearbeitungen wird in keep right nun ein Hinweis "fehlender 'von' (from), Relation 812576" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=115498180

Diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10214413/history
war zuvor als from-Way
in dieser Relation enthalten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/812576/history

Gilt das Rechtsabbiege-Gebot von der Olgastraße in die B 31 noch oder ist das aufgehoben.

Fragende Grüße
rene78 (2020-01-09 20:09:39+00:00): Danke! Weiss nicht, was ich da gemacht habe. Sollte wieder passen.
PT-53 (2020-01-09 11:14:59+00:00): Hallo rene78,
für diesen Fußweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741327671/history
werden im OSM-Inspector wie auch in keep right Fehlerhinweise angezeigt:
OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.27270&lat=47.69525&zoom=18&opacity=0.96&overlays=islands,islands_car,islands_bicycle,islands_all
keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=115493711
Gehwege sollten eigentlich nur dann als separater Way eingezeichnet werden, wenn der Gehweg von der Straße - im OSM-Sinn - baulich getrennt ist. Soweit ich das auf den Luftbildern richtig erkennen kann, ist das dort nicht der Fall und die Info über den Gehweg sollte deshalb besser mit den entspr. Merkmalen an der Straße eingetragen werden.
Meine Empfehlung wäre dieses Stück Gehweg zu löschen und diesen Hauszugang
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741327672/history
direkt an die Straße anzuschließen.

Wenn Gehwege als separater Way eingetragen werden, sollten sie wenigstens am Anfang und am Ende jeweils mit der Straße verbunden werden. Sonst sind sie "Inseln".

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
rene78 (2020-01-09 20:57:43+00:00): Das sind aber schon baulich getrennte Bürgersteige und können nach meinem Verständnis auch so gemappt werden. Habe sie jetzt ein wenig erweitert, sodass die Inseln weg sind.
PT-53 (2020-01-11 15:20:12+00:00): Hallo rene78,
ein Bordstein zwischen Straße und Gehweg  ist keine bauliche Trennung >> im OSM-Sinn <<. Einen Grünstreifen o.ä. kann ich dort auf den Luftbildern nicht erkennen. 
Siehe hierzu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bearbeitungsstandards_und_-konventionen#Stra.C3.9Fen_mit_getrennten_Spuren
Auch im OSM-Forum wird überwiegend diese Meinung vertreten:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68379

Wenn trotzdem separates Gehweg gemacht wird, sollte es auch möglichst vollständig mit allen legalen / empfohlenen Straßen-Querungsmöglichgkeiten und damit auch Routingfähig sein. Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/38962814
fehlt z.B. die Verbingung zwischen Gehweg und Straße. Auch fehlt der Gehweg auf der westl. Seite der Daisendorfer Straße.
Die Auswirkungen von evtl. unvollständigem Fußweg-Mapping kannst Du ganz gut mit brouter mit Profil Wandern testen:
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=19/47.69543/9.27220/standard&lonlats=9.271739,47.695158;9.271806,47.695931&profile=hiking-beta
brouter wird täglich nachts aktuallisiert.
Grüße
eggie (2019-11-02 22:20:34+00:00): Je hebt door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus Hoofdstraat 97 naar een ander deel van Voorthuizen verplaatst.
Kijk eens hier. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76539136
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 22:29:45+00:00): adres hersteld
eggie (2019-11-02 22:47:51+00:00): Je hebt een tankstation in een tankstation gemapt. Eén van de twee graag weghalen. Het beste kun je op de adresnode taggen en de fuel tag van het gebouw halen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-02 23:12:24+00:00): duplicated tags verwijderd
Mark Esperanto (2019-11-02 22:25:01+00:00): There are still some left-over tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741327889
mueschel (2019-11-03 08:46:38+00:00): Not only on this way - there are at least 33 objects with all foreign tags and no common OSM tags.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NFk
marc__marc (2020-10-14 14:50:32+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28067342
80 bandes de circulation, cela me semble beaucoup :)
Cordialement,
Marc
eggie (2019-11-02 23:21:35+00:00): Dag WWM  Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-11-03 19:01:22+00:00): Welocme to OSM! Your form of the designation of a parking lot does not correspond to the standard. Also the value of the roads does not correspond to the construction. Please take a look at the corrections.
Glassman (2019-11-02 23:52:08+00:00): Tip: Instead of grass and a descriptive name, use leisure=pitch + sport=archery + surface=grass
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76540074
Glassman (2019-11-02 23:53:21+00:00): Your edits look very good. This area needs some care. Let me know if you need help. I'm in Mount Vernon.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76540074
user_5359 (2019-11-05 19:25:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

You add many no standard key to OSM like 
ACCURACY=2
ACQTECH=Computed
ALCODE=VGFN
ALTYPE=Land Claim
CREDATE=20030407
DATASETNAM=CA
JUR1=YT
LANGUAGE1=English
LANGUAGE2=French
LANGUAGE3=No Language
LANGUAGE4=No Language
LANGUAGE5=No Language
METACOVER=Partial
NAME1=VUNTUT GWITCHIN FIRST NATION
NAME2=PREMIÈRE NATION DES GWITCHIN VUNTUT
NAME3=NULL
NAME4=NULL
NAME5=NULL
NID=3ab7acc8517b440f9acc548ba1d4be1a
PROVIDER=Federal
REVDATE=20190903
SPECVERS=1.1
WEBREF=http://clss.nrcan.gc.ca/map-carte-eng.php?can=VGFN

What is the meaning of this keys and what are the source?
Has this import been discussed with the local OSM community and on the import list?
kapazao (2019-11-03 15:22:40+00:00): Hola, veo que eres nuevo en OpenStreetMap y he estado comprobando las ediciones que has realizado recientemente en Chauchina.
Te recomiendo leer la wiki de OSM España (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:España) antes de seguir realizando ediciones, sobre todo la parte de primeros pasos, que puede ayudarte bastante.
He corregido muchas de las ediciones que has hecho que no estaban bien y te aconsejo preguntes si tienes dudas a la hora de editar para no poner cosas mal, que es normal al principio.
Un saludo, gracias por tus contribuciones y ánimo a seguir editando.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76541006
EXC4L3 (2019-11-03 01:13:30+00:00): Why don't you go black when you zoom out? Just the streets that do not appear in black, in Pokémon go, do not appear.
mueschel (2019-11-03 12:25:41+00:00): Hi,
I see that you are adding the tag "passenger_display_info" to bus stops. The correct tag for this would be "passenger_information_display". Could you change that?

Thanks!
daniel_solow (2019-11-03 18:24:59+00:00): I saw the error on the last 7 bus stops i added with "Go Map!" I'm still new to the mobile app which doesn't suggest the correct tag spelling. 

They are now correct. Thanks for the tip!
abakus_uploader (2019-11-03 23:31:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Baloo Uriza (2019-11-23 21:15:18+00:00): When they're not expressways, they shouldn't be tagged trunk.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76542707
viloan (2019-11-03 04:04:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DUGA (2022-03-12 19:40:03+00:00): Would you please use a computer to carefully check your edits? Do you believe that a fire hydrant can be found at this place?

https://imgur.com/a/cIhkUtw

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MAPS.ME/Questionable_OSM_Edits)
DavidKewley (2019-11-03 06:35:01+00:00): I've reverted your edit, because you deleted part of a street, and misclassified an existing service road as a motorway.

Welcome to OSM, but please take care to make only reasonable edits when you edit our shared map.
aquarix (2019-11-03 12:59:26+00:00): Hello Sierżant York,
you have moved some nodes from Poland to the equator with this changeset.
A well-intentioned advice: Don't make such big changes all at once but rather more often and smaller. This makes it easier to see and understand what has changed.
In addition, it is more difficult to correct something with a mobile device if you have made a mistake.
Regards aquarix
H_A_B_U (2019-11-03 14:01:11+00:00): Hi
Sorry, I didn't notice this problem.
In the future I will pay more attention to such things.
Best regards
Sierżant York
btwhite92 (2019-12-16 04:26:48+00:00): Why have all these single interchanges been bumped up from 'trunk' to 'motorway'? This is against tagging guidelines as specified under the Motorway section here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification
Jakson Aquino (2019-11-03 12:16:35+00:00): Gabriel, passei várias vezes nos últimos dias na rua equador e vi que estão construindo uma segunda pista atravessando as linhas do trem e do VLT. Já asfaltaram. Acho que estão só esperando o concreto na parte dos trilhos terminar de endurecer para liberar.
Você apagou o que eu tinha mapeado como via em construção.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 23:04:05+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10252869 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restrictio
Heinz_V (2019-11-03 10:36:48+00:00): I created the tag type=shanty. This is an error. Please sign in to the Indian telegram group for help and discussion.
Once again addr:city=Mumbai does not make sense, if there are valid administrative boundaries.
Heinz_V (2019-11-03 10:37:37+00:00): Sorry: YOU created type=shanty.
tom_konda (2019-11-25 16:46:07+00:00): こんにちは。
この編集で気になった点があるので1点質問します。
この編集で、name=神奈川県立大和高等学校 の地物を amenity=school から leisure=park に変更しています。この変更の出典は何かあるのでしょうか？
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
ma-rt-in (2019-11-03 13:19:59+00:00): Hallo,
mobile Blitzeranhänger werden in OSM nicht erfasst, da diese eben mobil sind und jederzeit den Standort wechseln können.
Ich werde die Node nun löschen.
vg
BCNorwich (2019-11-04 07:56:27+00:00): Hi you're still making some mistakes. Duplicate highways, crossing highways without joining, joining highways to area outlines.
user_10149683 (2019-11-05 00:52:34+00:00): No  stop it
freebeer (2019-11-10 11:01:56+00:00): this is a completely unhelpful comment.  mapper Cebderby has given a detailed and clear explanation of the problems and issues with your mapping, which should be respected and not simply dismissed in the way you have by trying to deny reality, closing your eyes, and hoping it is all a bad dream and those nasty mappers out there should leave you alone.
gecho111 (2019-11-03 21:03:39+00:00): Seems to me it would have better leaving the dirt roads as tracks.  They are impassable when wet and not maintained in winter which is why I tagged them differently to help prevent people from getting stranded as I've seen people forced to abandon their vehicles and walk out.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-11-03 21:21:48+00:00): I would better think handling such conditions with tracktype=3 (mostly solid) rather than a demotion to track.
gecho111 (2019-11-04 02:14:10+00:00): That might work.  I never tried applying tracktype to anything other than a track.
JAAS (2020-02-01 03:15:04+00:00): Este complejo religioso está rodeado por una pared. No es un edificio dentro de otro. OSM no permite ingresar uno o varios edificios dentro de otro(s) y el validador genera un aviso para evitar sean ingresados. Este caso ya lo corregí, pero aprovecho para comentarle para futuros casos. Gracias!
Map-Peter (2019-11-03 08:52:36+00:00): Hallo look4book, 
befindet sich das Denkmal wirklich innerhalb des Militärgeländes oder vielleicht ein paar Meter weiter nördlich? 
Gruß Peter