piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyton (2021-05-07 18:54:42+00:00): Dessen bin ich mir bewusst, deshalb habe ich da ja auch die Qualität getagged. Außerdem habe ich vorher hier nachgefragt: 
https://t.me/osmberlin/4350 und auch eine Antwort bekommen: 
https://t.me/osmberlin/4352

>"Residential weil da Häuser stehen"

Dem würd ich zustimmen. Vorher war es ja "nur" ein footway, ich hätte da wenigstens einen highway=service mit service=alley und bicycle=yes draus gemacht.

Ich selbst hab auch Bilder gemacht als ich da war: https://kartaview.org/details/3553641/3350/track-info

Aufgefallen ist mir das da das in KartaView und auch wandrer.earth nicht blau markiert ist.
GinaroZ (2021-05-05 23:24:57+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this edit?
Danielhol (2021-05-05 23:35:11+00:00): Hello Ginaro. Second by second GPS analysis of the road at Google Street View Level. There are road signs that separate the different speed limits along various sections.
GinaroZ (2021-05-06 14:35:49+00:00): Thanks for the reply, though I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the GPS analysis.

But if you are using Google Street View to see where the speed limit changes then that it is not allowed for mapping in OSM.
Danielhol (2021-05-06 15:22:45+00:00): Hi Ginaro. Thanks for coming back to me. We receive customer feedback, and then look at the GPS data on our side to understand where the speeding anomaly they've reported might lie in the data. My apologies, I wasn't aware that Google imagery wasn't allowed. I will avoid this moving forward, and will rely on customer feedback solely instead. Thanks...Dan
trigpoint (2021-05-07 08:09:47+00:00): Hi Dan
If you are working on behalf of a company or as part of an organised effort then you will need to make sure that whoever is asking you to do the updates follows https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines .
There's nothing too onerous there - most of it's just about letting everyone know what you're doing.

Cheers Phil
wireguy (2021-05-07 13:43:54+00:00): Hi Ester.  Thanks for taking the time to map in your area.   No need to give names to individual houses.  You can square the corners on houses by pressing the 'Q' key (for sQuare).   I made some changes here.  Can you change the others?   If you have any questions, just ask.
mueschel (2021-05-13 08:47:00+00:00): Please spend some time on quality control before your uploads - you added many small lakes which don't exist at all.
user_5359 (2021-05-07 06:32:25+00:00): You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/939545250, https://www.osm.org/way/939545247
ottwiz (2021-05-05 22:46:17+00:00): Lol, for some reason the JOSM didn't commit my editing message. Weird...
ottwiz (2021-05-05 22:48:53+00:00): To recap what i did, I added forests and added roads. But I also removed some of the landuses, and huge batches of forest, because of the quality of what I draw wasn't good enough, it wasn't snapped to other stuff like waterbody  and it looked weird. But i want to snap it so it looks better but doing it manually (without the JOSM's follow line tool) it's a pain.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-06 14:47:50+00:00): When the follow tool would be too tedious I'll split up the big area into a multipolygon then reuse one of the sides in both the old and new. Does that make sense? could be helpful here.
ottwiz (2021-05-06 14:57:59+00:00): Yeah, actually I'm doing that on some stuff, and it makes sense, but at some parts it was ugly and it would be time consuming to align it.
ottwiz (2021-05-06 14:59:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104210397 actually this is where i applied this technique
ottwiz (2021-05-05 22:46:30+00:00): Lol, for some reason the JOSM didn't commit my editing message. Weird...
ottwiz (2021-05-05 22:47:19+00:00): To recap what i did, I added forests and added roads. But I also removed some of the landuses.
zvenzzon (2021-11-12 09:19:17+00:00): Beroende på vad som faktiskt finns på galgbergsmagasinet kanske man kan fundera på area=no och highway=path på den här sträckan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939546248
Aerond (2021-11-12 16:08:15+00:00): Lägga till de existerande menar du? låter rimligt.
user_5359 (2021-05-06 04:59:01+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte dass bei OSM die Beschreibung von Objekten die höchste Priorität hat. Objekte, die nur aus einem Namen bestehen, haben wenig Sinn. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)

Bitte auch mal die Seite https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:social_facility
user_5359 (2021-05-06 03:57:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I just revert your changeset because of technical errors (Among other things you have deleted the city borders). You entry is now https://www.osm.org/node/8703611553.
ma-rt-in (2021-05-09 04:56:18+00:00): Hallo,
deine Verwendung von name ist hier leider etwas falsch. 
Schau dir am besten mal die Wiki-Seite für Bäume an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=tree

vg
treestryder (2021-10-04 00:39:13+00:00): I just drove through that area and the Grand Trunk Western railway is long gone, where the goal of OpenStreetMap to accurately represent current ground truth.

I think a more appropriate place for this edit would be the Open Historical Map.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
surveyor54 (2021-05-18 07:26:49+00:00): Mit access=no, bicycle=yes, foot=yes, darf hier kein Traktor fahren.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439038950#map=17/50.15060/9.14230

Wenn keine Beschilderung vorhanden ist, würde ich auf Feldwegen kein access vergeben.
Oft ist ein access schon impliziert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
msondergaard (2021-05-06 11:17:46+00:00): If the foot paths actually exist then they should not be deleted. Whether they are on private land or not doesn't really matter. Instead, the foot paths should have access set to private so alltrails etc can avoid routing people through the area.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-05-07 01:45:03+00:00): Undeleted and marked as private in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104280470

Is there a gate on Waterfalls Lane at Balsam Street? Are all these roads private? Are they maintained by the municipality?
stewy (2021-05-07 11:50:42+00:00): There is no gate but there is a guard house at the entrance. Access is restricted to owners and permitted visitors. The roads are not maintained by the municipality. They should probably be marked be marked as private also. Is that something that you would do for me?
Jarek 🚲 (2021-05-09 02:13:46+00:00): Thanks for the information. I made this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104382794

One more follow-up question if you're familiar with this area: does the roadway mapped off Mariners Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777910117 have a separate name, or is it only a driveway and houses on it have addresses on Mariners Way?
Warin61 (2021-05-10 04:36:33+00:00): Hi, 
I take it the source of this information is a GPS survey? 

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
rennicm (2021-05-10 09:30:06+00:00): You would have noted that I had added the source tag of GPS given the path was tracklogged with GPS. I'm curious as to why you queried this given this tag? Regarding changeset comments  which I presume you are also alluding to, I find the Vespucci editor, which was used in the field for this particular edit, awkward to use seemingly requiring a comment for each and every upoload. Although I am still working out how to use Vespucci.
Warin61 (2021-05-11 07:52:34+00:00): No source tag on Way: Bulloo River Walk (939568662)

Much better to have the detail on the change set comment.
Warin61 (2021-05-11 09:16:37+00:00): I tend to make each of my change set comments different .. as they are usually .. well .. different. It is more work but when I look back I can find the one I'm looking for easier.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-06-10 03:06:22+00:00): halo victor. 
trust doing well. i found incomplete turn restriction relation in this area. relation Id 10121956  https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/10121956

would you mind to fix this issue?

thank you so much.. happy mapping
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-14 01:50:39+00:00): Hi Victor 2015,
I also found incomplete turn restriction relation in this area. please check relation id 10121958, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/10121958. 

Thank you, happy mapping!
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-14 03:47:25+00:00): Hi victor, I found you delete another 2 roles of this relation https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/9375090. you left it with only "via" role. any reason behind that ?? thanks !
nevw (2021-05-06 05:48:41+00:00): Hi
You need to connect the footway to Siding Terrace so that pedestrian routing will be able to work through the area.
iandees (2021-05-06 03:30:43+00:00): Hi! It looks like you added a park that already exists as a golf course. Did you mean to draw a golf course instead?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104214391
user_5359 (2021-05-08 04:09:45+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12591568. Did you want to change the colour?
MacLondon (2021-05-08 15:37:52+00:00): Thanks for pointing out the error. Now rectified.
user_5359 (2021-05-08 03:50:55+00:00): Hello! Is there a reason why the website:reservation key, which has existed since 2017, is not used?

Bonjour, Y a-t-il une raison pour laquelle la clé website:reservation qui existe depuis 2017 n'est pas utilisée ?
PanierAvide (2021-05-08 06:25:15+00:00): Hello,
I will answer as I'm co-organizer of this project of the month in which many people participate now in France. We choose reservation:website=* because there was no clear documentation of which tag to use in the wiki, and also no massive use of one tag compared to another in Taginfo. Following what exist with contact:website=* and reservation=*, having a reservation:website=* made sense. If at some point an international consensus is reached on how to map this info, our community will change tags accordingly.
Best regards,
Adrien.
mueschel (2021-05-09 09:03:32+00:00): The most used tag so far is in fact 'reservation:url'. Unfortunately none of them is widely used or documented yet. 
The 'reservation:url' would fit with other similar tags like 'opening_hours:url'.
ti-lo (2023-02-07 10:11:02+00:00): Here's a documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shop_suffix#Website
user_5359 (2021-05-06 03:49:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 13:52:27+00:00): se é sem nome, deixe sem nada no nome, e não coloque "sem nome" no nome.
user_5239402 (2021-05-06 02:49:41+00:00): 안녕하세요
왜 바뀜집합 댓글을 심슨으로만 적는 것이죠? 제대로 쓰세요.
GinaroZ (2021-05-06 11:10:34+00:00): Can you not still access the cycleway from the road, i.e. if you use the roundabout coming from the west?
nyampire (2021-05-07 04:24:37+00:00): OSMへの参加、ありがとうございます。
レビューを行いました。
地物（対象となるデータ）の nameタグには、一般的な名称（例えば、"道路"や"校庭"など）は入力しませんので、そのように修正しました。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104215714
DressyPear4 (2021-05-06 19:40:02+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta, antes estava correto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104216443
Nimanies (2021-05-06 15:22:56+00:00): الان پشت پارک دلفین ها معبر عمومی و خودرویی شده
HamiiidAA (2021-05-06 15:25:46+00:00): سلام و وقت بخیر
بله اون مسیر که حذف شده بود به اشتباه دوباره ایجاد شد.
سپاس
Strubbl (2021-05-06 15:52:08+00:00): Hallo bollyboll, ich habe die 4-fach Nodes aus diesem CS wieder auf den einen ursprünglichen Node reduziert (siehe CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104263252).
Ich weiß jetzt aber nicht, welcher von den 4 Nodes die richtige Öffnungszeit hatte. Daher habe ich die Zeit vom ursprünglichen Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3013165709 nicht verändert.
bollyboll (2021-05-06 19:22:15+00:00): OK, ich sehe, da habe ich irgendetwas Merkwürdiges gemacht. Ich versuche es noch einmal mit einem anderen Editor.
Cascafico (2021-05-06 08:20:19+00:00): se non è proprio in rovina, direi disused:amenity
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104223326
nevw (2021-05-06 11:20:22+00:00): You business entry has no physical presence here.
Please map you business at the building location you operate from.
I have reverted the entry.
 Using something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business listing at the building you operate from in to the OSM with suitable tags may assist.
kapazao (2021-05-06 10:29:49+00:00): Hola, cuando hagas cambios de nombres de vías es necesario que indiques las fuentes. Por otra parte, si es una calle sin nombre, se usa la etiqueta noname=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:noname=yes). El tipo de vía además no es una carretera.
Ya lo corrijo, un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104224879
hauke-stieler (2021-05-06 13:51:17+00:00): Hi,

hier war bereits an der Straße mittels cycleway-tags getaggt, dass es einen Radweg gibt. Am besten an die Faustregel halten: Wenn eine Bauliche Trennung da ist (z.B. ein Geländer), dann separat als Weg einzeichnen.

Grüße
Hauke
Russ McD (2021-05-06 06:59:51+00:00): Rather than a single node, this is a large weir, arguably a dam.  If it was mapped incorrectly, you should have least added some more detail, such as the fact it is a way, and has a pedestrian bridge over it.  I have now added this.
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-06 07:19:14+00:00): Thank you for let me know the right correction, Russ McD. Happy Mapping :)
SekeRob (2021-05-08 07:43:48+00:00): Hi,

Did your wiki not tell you it's actually a garage door ;? Leaving the (JOSM) error there until someone follows up with an actual survey seems more useful to me. Anyway, have updated the tagging now and added 2 more to the next door building.
cheers.
opendcc (2021-05-08 18:52:12+00:00): Thank your for the update.
Znaika (2026-01-08 16:13:41+00:00): Ist hier Kita Villa Kunterbunt? https://kitas-willich.de/willich/kita-villa-kunterbunt/
stoni100 (2026-01-09 06:34:46+00:00): ja, danke für den Hinweis, ich habe das mal aktualsiert 
Grüße
Michael
waldhans (2021-07-18 13:39:56+00:00): Falls ein Gebäude bereits unter Denkmalschutz steht und so getaggt ist, bitte keine weiteren Information dazu schreiben. Im dem Fall der Kindergarten, ich habe das auf einen Knoten verschoben. Eifache Regel: Denkmal auf die Mauern, die Verwendung(en) auf Knoten;
ist behoben; 
mfg Kurt
stoni100 (2021-08-09 09:29:39+00:00): :-)
Jetzt hast du hoffentlich dir geholfen .... mir hast du die Arbeit erschwert :-(
user_5359 (2021-05-08 04:12:01+00:00): Hello! Please check my modification of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799612223/history
ktdw (2021-06-04 21:56:08+00:00): Mag sein, dass die Zellerhornwiese ein Naturschutzgebiet ist und nicht betreten werden darf. 
Die Realität sieht aber anders aus. Hier herrscht reger Fuß- und Radverkehr. Auch Verbotsschilder habe ich nirgends gesehen. 
Also die Frage, ob das Löschen der Wege Sinn macht?
DD1GJ (2021-06-05 22:56:15+00:00): Hallo ktdw,

herzlichen Dank für Deine ortskundigen Anmerkungen. Die Wege auf der Wiese wurden von Ulli73 zunächst vollständig gelöscht. Ich habe die Löschung rückgängig gemacht und die Wege nach dem Lebenszyklus-Prinzip unsichbar gemacht. Ulli73 arbeitet für eine Behörde und hat in einem Telefonat die Situation etwas anders beshcriben als von Dir nun aus der Praxis dargestellt. Da werden ich nochmal nachhaken, zumal der Account immer noch nicht als Behördenaccount gekennzeichnet ist.

Das Thema "OSM-Daten im Spannungsfeld zwischen Naturschutz und Outdoor-Apps" steht in ca. 11 Stunden (12:15) auf der Agenda des OSM-Sonntags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FOSSGIS_2021/OSM-Sonntag

Wenn Dich das Thema interessiert, kannst Du gerne noch eich ein kostenloses Ticket buchen.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
kuhni74 (2024-08-16 14:20:27+00:00): Where do you have the names "Milke" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4526887686 and "Samlin" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8758932291 from? https://www.martinpierre.fr/medias/files/81655469carte-khumbu-rolwaling-pdf.pdf calls the former "Ama Bhamare" and the latter "Melagpe Shira".
kuhni74 (2024-08-16 14:32:30+00:00): https://www.allardteraa.nl/in/14/65214_0190.html
kuhni74 (2024-08-16 14:33:30+00:00): https://www.allardteraa.nl/in/14/70240_0520.html
seichter (2024-08-16 15:15:59+00:00): I can't remember having added names. 
If so, I have taken them from free usable sources like the map collection at the University of Texas.
In Nepal there are dozens of languages, several scripts and even more transliterations. 
When comparing e.g. village names on navigational versus election related maps, it is not uncommon to have even more than two versions of latin transliteration.
So I'm not able to tell whether a name is official, just locally used or outdated.
kuhni74 (2024-08-16 15:36:46+00:00): Thank you very much! I'm aware of the complexness of the names and transliterations. I know the relevant Texas University Map 1:250.000, but there are not many named mountains on it. This may have been the / a source for the two names in question: https://pahar.in/pahar/Maps--Primary/Nepal%20Maps/Nepal%20Topo%20Maps/2786%2001%20Lamabagar.jpg
PT-53 (2021-05-06 10:39:10+00:00): Hallo TZ2,
ist "Schmids Weiher" ein offizieller Name oder ist das nur der Eigentümer ?
Fragende Grüße
ThomasZell (2021-05-06 10:45:49+00:00): Der Weiher hat keinen offiziellen Namen, wurde vor vielen Jahren vom Bauunternehmer Schmid ausgebagert und heisst seitdem so.
PT-53 (2021-05-06 10:58:49+00:00): Dann wäre dafür loc_name wohl passender.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name?uselang=de
ThomasZell (2021-05-06 11:16:01+00:00): Stimmt! Kannte ich noch nicht, ändere ich gleich.
mavl (2021-05-07 15:12:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет на линии границ населённых пунктов ту же самую информацию, которая уже есть на точках населённых пунктов. Это делается с какой-то специальной целью?  
Просто несколько лет назад, когда по всей Тюменской области добавлялась информация об официальных статусах и численности населения, вся эта информация была перенесена с границ на точки, чтобы легче было отслеживать изменение данных и не запутаться в дублирующей информации.
whb (2021-05-07 08:05:20+00:00): Guten Tag,

ist das sicher nicht mehr die städtische Kindertageseinrichtung Gadamerplatz?

Viele Grüße
whb
whb (2021-05-07 08:07:22+00:00): Die falsche Straße der Adresse habe ich entfernt.
Lenny_123 (2021-05-07 11:57:35+00:00): Stimmt. Danke!
gscscnd (2021-05-06 20:35:39+00:00): Niestety musiałem wycofać ten zestaw zmian, ponieważ narysowane w ten sposób chodniki wprowadziłyby zamieszanie na mapach i w nawigacjach (https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#104233470), tzn. nie powinny się tak same przez siebie „plątać”. Zobacz poradniki dla początkujących (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide), przyjrzyj się też temu, jak są narysowane istniejące chodniki. Staraj się wysyłać małe zestawy zmian (ten był pod tym względem OK) — łatwiej jest je sprawdzić i mniej pracy się traci gdy trzeba któryś wycofać. Jeśli masz jakieś pytania, to możesz pisać np. na <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23> lub do mnie.
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-07 05:49:00+00:00): bonjour,
je pense que le building=hut est plus approprié sur la partie concernant le batiment (et pas toute la surface car cela donne cela : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939730223). Les autres tags pouvant effectivement s'appliquer sur l'ensemble.
Si ce que je viens d'écrire est incompréhensible tu me dis !
je vais devoir venir à hossegor tester les fast-food, si j'en crois les dernières contributions !
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104233764
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-07 05:51:02+00:00): Et petite question pour le chemin proche https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2658313
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104233764
OT Hossegor (2021-05-11 12:23:52+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement, c'est mieux.
Oui, il faut venir ! Il y a beaucoup de choses à tester :) 
Bonne journée
aweech (2021-05-06 16:51:50+00:00): Hi,
The information for this hotel was already in OSM attached to a different building. I assumed that by duplicating the information, you meant to say that the hotel has more than one building, so I removed the information from both buildings and created a point for it instead. Also, this building is already finished, so it should not be tagged as building=construction.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-05-07 08:21:56+00:00): According to BIng, the area is vacant there seems to be no building. Co:ordinates 38.595184, -109.570297
SomeoneElse (2021-05-07 13:13:13+00:00): @Riyana_Shrestha Please use more helpful changeset comments in preference to just "added information"
aweech (2021-05-07 16:06:35+00:00): Yes, Bing imagery is out of date, as it very often is. Esri, Mapbox, and Maxar imagery provide more up-to-date imagery.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-05-10 06:43:36+00:00): @SomeoneElse: Will be adding more details.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-05-10 06:44:34+00:00): @ aweech: Thanks for the information, we will be talking with the team about this. Thank you again.
aweech (2021-05-06 16:57:29+00:00): Hi,
You literally drew the hotel over a gas station. This hotel was already in OSM in its correct location. I removed the information you added to the bogus building on this gas station and added it to the real Recapture Lodge.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-05-07 08:19:32+00:00): My bad, sorry. Thanks for the change.
habi (2021-05-06 09:41:35+00:00): Hallo Erich

Wir 'arbeiten' in Bern gerade an der Visualisierung der Geschlechter-Verteilung der Strassennamen [1].
Bei Änderungen von Strassennamen wäre es deshalb wichtig, dass die Verlinkung zu Wikidata im `name:etymology:wikidata`-Tag auch angepasst wird.

Gruss,
habi

[1]: http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2021-May/010877.html
habi (2021-05-06 09:44:52+00:00): Ich habe das im Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104239481 nun angepasst.
habi (2021-05-06 09:59:57+00:00): Im Schweizer OSM-Chat haben wir auch diskutiert, dass es evtl. sinnvoll sein könnte, den alten Namen in `old_name` zu transferieren, das habe ich nun auch gemacht.
erichiseli (2021-05-06 10:55:19+00:00): Cooles Projekt, danke für die Anpassungen!
habi (2021-05-06 12:33:48+00:00): <3
eggie (2021-05-06 10:30:05+00:00): Dag Leo..  
De toponym had nog steeds een relatie.. Alleen outer.. Dat heeft dan geen functie als mp. Bovendien is een toponym geen landuse. 
Ik heb die relatie eraf gehaald en de tagging op de polygoon gezet.
Denk dat nu dan wel de naam zichtbaar wordt.
Aan de noorzijde lag een mp gras als outer met daarbuiten een zwembad??  als inner. Die relatie heb ik ook veranderd. Een inner hoort altijd binnen de outer te liggen.
Maar wellicht was je wat met mp's aan het stoeien?

Even kijken of de naam Landgoed Eikenburg nu zichtbaar wordt.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-06 10:33:14+00:00): Dat water bij adres 11A heb ik nu helemaal verwijderd. Het is er in werkelijk helemaal niet. 
Als achtergrondfoto gebruik ik Quick ortho Voorjaar 2021
het kloosterbos (2021-05-06 10:41:49+00:00): Hallo eggie :-)
Reuze bedankt weer voor je uitleg, geduld en moeite. MP gras: ik zal binnenkort gaan kijken in het veld, waar nu precies de perceelgrenzen liggen. Klopt met het zwembad bij 11A, schat ik zo.
eggie (2021-05-06 11:45:27+00:00): Dat zwembad had ik nog niet verwijderd zie ik.. Vergeten 'up te loaden'

Ik laat het aan jou over. 
Mapse
eggie
het kloosterbos (2021-05-06 17:48:46+00:00): done.
l:-)
eggie (2021-05-06 10:37:53+00:00): Feedback..  Lijkt me helemaal correct met tracktype=grade1 icm surface=asphalt
Gr eggie