piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
UrSuS (2023-03-20 07:54:51+00:00): When making changes don't break route relations!!!
eggie (2022-09-26 22:03:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Haal je nog even die achterhaalde website=https://www.bakework.nl/  weg bij LOIC?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-27 07:30:28+00:00): website verwijderd..
Klopt shop=pastry wel?

MVG
eggie
JanPieterszoon (2022-09-27 09:32:44+00:00): Website was ik inderdaad vergeten. Bedankt voor het weghalen!

shop=pastry blijkt achteraf inderdaad niet te kloppen. Ik heb nu op hun instagram gekeken en daar noemen zij zichzelf een warenhuis. Het objecttype heb ik nu aangepast. 

mvg
eggie (2022-09-27 09:38:43+00:00): Oke.. veel plezier met mappen.

Groet
eggie
Map-Peter (2022-09-26 22:06:38+00:00): Hallo wermak,
 
bitte das: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201832590/history kurzfristig korrigieren.
 
Gruß Peter
mueschel (2022-09-27 10:02:39+00:00): Please don't add links to plain google search results to all your POIs. Every user can do a web search with the name of a POI on their own, choosing their preferred search engine.
City-busz (2022-09-27 17:11:07+00:00): This is not a plain Google search, it's a reference to the Google Knowledge Graph ID: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P2671

It refers to the knowledge panel shown on the right side with useful information about the place, user reviews and so on.

Isn't it allowed to reference Google Knowledge Graph ID from OpenStreetMap? I thought it's somehow similar how we refer to page ID-s on Facebook, Tripadvisor and Foursquare and similar sites.
mueschel (2022-09-27 17:35:09+00:00): The "contact:***" keys are to tag different ways to contact a POI. A google web page with search results for unrelated web pages is not a way to contact the POI.
Using the links you provided does not show me any way to contact the shops besides a phone number that should be tagged as contact:phone.
Jrachi (2022-09-27 08:37:01+00:00): Il ref corretto è S31.
Ciao!
wolfamyc (2022-09-27 21:19:04+00:00): Touchè!! Sistemo subito!! Come stai Ivo?
Jrachi (2022-09-27 21:29:00+00:00): Bene.
E sono contento di vedere che lavori sul campo!
cheatach (2022-09-26 21:25:42+00:00): proponuję dodać do każdej tag website=http://planety.rzeszow.pl/
cheatach (2022-09-26 21:40:50+00:00): ok nie zauważyłem że w relacji już dałeś
michalgwo (2024-02-07 10:58:35+00:00): Coś mi nie pasuje to tagowanie planet, sprawdziłem jak to wygląda w innych miastach, gdzie są oznaczone takie układy i często powtarza się tourism=artwork + artwork_type=sculpture, co bardziej mi pasuje niż tourism=attraction.
Przykłady:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/334482832
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/611221203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313291119

Nazwa też wydaje się troche spammy, moim zdaniem podchodzi pod opisową, ja bym zostawił same nazwy planet w nazwie, a do description dał "Planeta modelu układu słonecznego nad Wisłokiem".
Co myślisz o tym?
Pooh01 (2024-02-08 07:00:39+00:00): W Rzeszowie na pewno to pod "artwork" ani pod "sculpture" nie podchodzi. Poza Słońcem w Rynku (które ma trójwymiarową postać), pozostałe planety to rysunki pod szybką w poziomie chodnika.
https://rzeszow-news.pl/w-rzeszowie-powstal-model-ukladu-slonecznego-planety-na-orbitach-z-19-stycznia-1354-roku/

Jeśli chodzi o nazwy, to upierał się nie będę - pozostały z pierwszej wersji, kiedy wrzuciłem planety bez łączenia ich relacją.
michalgwo (2024-02-08 07:41:38+00:00): Pod każdą szybką obok rysunku, po lewej stronie jest też model każdej planety, w większości jest na tyle mały, że trzeba się mocno przyglądnąć żeby go zobaczyć, ale widać go dobrze w przypadku Saturna i Jowisza, np na tym zdjęciu: https://rzeszow-news.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/wszystko.jpg
michalgwo (2024-02-15 16:40:24+00:00): Zmieniłem nazwy, opisy i dodałem tagi wikidata
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:54:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126672268
felipeeugenio (2022-09-26 21:36:10+00:00): Hola. Ya no existe el edificio?
entonces por favor no borrar la dirección. Dejarla como un nodo para que no se pierda la información.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126672494
user_5359 (2022-09-29 21:11:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the newest version of the node: there are question and errors on key values!
Nakaner (2022-09-27 08:23:24+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Noch besser wäre es, du hättest die einzelnen Stellplätze als Flächen gemappt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126672809
Leo Slager (2022-09-26 21:47:48+00:00): fixed broken routerelations bus 163.
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-09-27 12:42:11+00:00): Thank you very much!
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-09-27 12:42:32+00:00): Thank you very much!
MxxCon (2022-09-27 04:33:56+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? There's a bike path on the right but not on the left?🤨 That seems contrary to the satellite imagery..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126673328
NameThatFollows (2022-09-27 13:39:38+00:00): This was done with Street complete, so I think I failed to specify. It is indeed on the left. Will fix if it hasn't been already
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126673328
legofahrrad (2022-10-01 18:53:39+00:00): Wenn hier nun ein anderes Restaurant ist, dann bitte mehr als nur den Namen ändern: Die Webseite des alten Restaurants ist noch verlinkt, Öffnungszeiten sind möglicherweise nicht mehr aktuell und und und...
Die Möglichkeit sollte es in OsmAnd doch geben, sich alle Tags anzeigen zu lassen oder nicht?
juhbi (2022-10-01 19:48:04+00:00): Das ehemalige "El Sol" soll wird seit geraumer Zeit umgebaut, nun ist ein neues Schild angebracht worden.
Daher habe ich zunächst nur den Namen angepasst und warte auf Neuigkeiten. ;)
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 13:18:28+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126673627
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 13:19:26+00:00): Hi DaanLT.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
DaanLT (2022-09-30 14:12:40+00:00): Hi, thank you. I will use test server, i didnt know there is one
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 13:18:37+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126673584
Davileci (2023-04-19 06:20:15+00:00): The tag `parking:lane:both` is deprecated in favour of `parking:both`.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-26 23:55:40+00:00): Cześć, czy lokalizacja AED się zgadza? Bo zostały dodane dwa na ulicy, a budynek OSP jest 25 m na południe.

https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl/#map=18/52.136061/17.307914
marcinosp (2022-09-27 04:22:44+00:00): Witaj, jeśli jest taka mozliwosc prosił bym o poprawienie lokalizacji i usuniecie jednego urzadzenia. Posiadamy jedno urzadzenie wewnatrz budynku OSP. Pozdrawiam
impiaaa (2022-09-27 15:32:23+00:00): Please remember to save your changes before moving on to a new area, to keep the changeset size reasonable.
Stretch Longfellow (2022-10-02 18:07:42+00:00): Having driven this many times, I'm not sure what your justification is in upgrading this to trunk road west of Brush, and I did not see any documentation on this. Trunk roads should not be spurs of the network when possible, and should have a significant destination. How does Haigler meet that definition?
Please refer to the OSM Wiki on highway classification if you're unsure about classification levels. Nebraska also has a chat on Slack relating to these very questions, and I believe Colorado does as well.
Let me know your justification and we can decide whether it needs to change or not.
phidauex (2022-10-03 19:21:41+00:00): Just a plug for both of you and anyone else checking the changeset, the Wiki has good documentation for Colorado now, based on the larger US discussions, and a lot of activity last year on talk-us and the US Slack. There are still open issues, of course, and there is good discussion on the Talk page which shows which trunks are more controversial than others, but that would be a good place to comment or suggest revisions. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification

Right now the light consensus is that US-34 probably does deserve to be trunk, not because of Haigler, but because it is the main route to southern Nebraska. Depending on what nebraska mappers wanted to do, I'd think this would probably extend at least to McCook / Hwy 83. If NE mappers felt like it wasn't trunk importance, then that might make CO change as well - all in or all out, so to speak.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126673901
Stretch Longfellow (2022-10-04 01:01:56+00:00): I added my points to the talk page there, but not sure where this conversation you're mentioning is taking place. All I found was one person saying it should be a trunk route to Kansas (which it doesn't enter...). If there's another conversation happening elsewhere, let me know!
phidauex (2022-10-04 01:42:09+00:00): Most of the conversation is on the OSM US Slack, #highway-classification channel, or embedded in a hundred changeset comments like this one. The wiki was our attempt to consolidate some of that feedback into a single location, even though all the source commentary isn't captured. The "Kansas" error would be mine, probably typing faster than I was thinking.
SDWilly (2022-09-26 22:52:29+00:00): No recuerdo hacer un cambio en Obarrio. pero gracias por el mensaje. miraré con detenimiento
NieWnen (2022-09-27 08:36:45+00:00): Zostały dziwne tagi xxx_completed
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 08:56:17+00:00): Aj, racja. Oznaczal3m sobie które już przejrzałem. Zaraz pokasuję
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 16:23:07+00:00): Posprzątane, dzięki za czujność
Dawid2849 (2022-10-27 14:04:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9939987204

To nie jest paczkomat, tylko lodowkomat.
Dawid2849 (2022-10-27 14:05:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9916992722

To samo tutaj, to również jest lodówkomat
kubahahaha (2022-10-28 05:05:51+00:00): Dzięki. Poprawiłem.
Sprawdzę jeszcze wszystkie z tagiem refrigated=yes
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-28 10:06:06+00:00): Please use addr: tags for addresses. Name tag should not be used for addresses.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*

in this case it should probably be 
addr:housenumber=1
addr:street=Tammeõie tee
addr:city=Randvere küla
addr:country=EE
Stretch Longfellow (2022-10-04 16:46:42+00:00): Why is this a trunk highway? I 76 is right there, and BL 76 does not really serve anything beyond Sterling (I'm kind of amazed it still exists beyond a spur into Sterling).

"The Trunk classification generally should not be applied to highways that are parallel to motorways, especially highways within a short distance (less than 5 miles) from the motorway." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Trunk
user_5359 (2022-09-29 21:14:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10054856496. what is the meaning of the tags
Way = end
node = near
other = high
(Possible a copy&paste error?)
andrew_zol (2022-09-30 23:57:22+00:00): Hi, yes, it looks like. I'll fix it right away.
Frans S (2022-09-28 10:30:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings should be tagged just as building=yes
No name tags like name=yes, when you are not familiar with the local situation 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126675585
Marek-M (2022-09-27 11:43:11+00:00): Cześć,
Przy edycji paczkomatów zmieniasz np. operator=ORLEN S.A na operator=Orlen ale NSI dalej będzie podpowiadał poprzednią wartość https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=amenity&v=parcel_locker&tt=orlen#orlenpaczka-ce4e28 - należy chyba zaktualizować dane w NSI. Innych problemów nie zauważyłem.
Marek-M (2022-09-27 11:48:01+00:00): Ok, utworzyłem PR do NSI w tym temacie: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7089
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 13:34:10+00:00): O, super, dzięki za szybkość.
Ja jeszcze dzisiaj wieczorem usiądę, to dodam może jakiś szablon którego nie ma jeszcze na NSI
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 16:42:47+00:00): Dodałem DPD Pickup Station i AliExpress.
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7090
☆Finvenkulo (2022-09-30 20:19:49+00:00): Może warto byłoby zastanowić się nad usunięciem "operator:wikipedia"? Nie wnosi on nic nowego w porównaniu do klucza "operator:wikidata" i w odróżnieniu od niego jest nieklikalny na stronie osm.org.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-27 08:12:18+00:00): O co chodzi? Zminiłeś brand:wikidata na paczkomat inpost, a brand na inpost. To na pewno nie ma sensu
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 08:58:35+00:00): Racja, operator powinien być inPost. Za chwilę poprawię.
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 16:32:08+00:00): Posprzątane, dzięki za czujność
wireguy (2022-10-21 14:28:35+00:00): hi madiener, can you look at ttor?  the way is not closed.   the medfield boundary also seems broken, and may  have been clipped when ttor was added.
madiener (2022-10-21 14:55:54+00:00): I think I got it all now.
Ewen Hill (2022-11-09 09:47:05+00:00): Hi Melb Guy. Just saw your update for Wellington Street with the bike lanes. There are bike lanes already installed on Wellington Street road however I have added cycleway:both:segregated=yes which means we probably don't need lanes you added. I rode it tonight and it really is just a small segregated elevated section. Happy to discuss.
highflyer74 (2022-09-27 06:49:18+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please do not add random data to building parts. What was your intention?
----------------------------------------
你好，欢迎来到OSM!

请不要在建筑部件上随意添加数据。你的意图是什么？
rhtb0 (2022-09-28 05:16:45+00:00): 모든 도로는 주거 도로가 아닙니다.
특히 대학교 내 도로, 아파트 내 도로, 건물 접근로 등등 그런 도로들은 주거 도로가 아니라 서비스 도로 입니다.
이름뜻 그대로 믿지 마세요. 번역된 이름과 의미가 다른 것들이 많습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-09-28 05:17:12+00:00): 주거 도로는 주거지 주변 도로만 해당합니다.
EMIdent (2022-09-27 02:00:31+00:00): I forgot the proposed Toll Plaza. so please add it :)
relaemanila (2022-09-27 05:20:28+00:00): Added a toll plaza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098140498#map=20/14.17333/121.14278&layers=H
relaemanila (2022-09-27 06:50:32+00:00): oops, I meant.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126679671#map=18/14.17503/121.14308&layers=H
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:01:56+00:00): Hello,
There seems to be an argument over the mapping of https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892 .  Can you please explain why you think you are correct?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:02:07+00:00): Hola,
Parece haber una discusión sobre el mapeo de https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892. ¿Puedes explicar por qué crees que estás en lo correcto?
Saludos,
Andy Townsend, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
Yudha Adjie (2022-09-28 02:31:12+00:00): I didnt found any sign that show its one way street, please check it carefully before change the street direction
muralito (2022-09-27 13:13:33+00:00): Hola Manuel.
Si sacas la etiqueta amenity=clinic que es lo que describe los servicios que se brindan ahi esto deja de serlo. Lo del building=hospital solo describe el edificio, no los servicios.
roux_ (2022-09-27 15:30:49+00:00): Hola Muralito, muchas gracias por la aclaración, desconocía este dato, lo voy a corregir. 
Gracias ♥
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-28 15:57:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавляете не совсем правильные запреты поворотов. Например, этого запрета поворота налево нет:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14628529  
  
Налево поворачивать запрещено, но не потому что там стоит знак "Поворот налево запрещён", а потому что стоит знак "Движение направо". То есть нужно использовать отношение "Движение направо".  
  
Точно так же нет и второго запрета поворота налево:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14628528  
  
Поворот налево запрещён не потому что есть знак "Поворот налево запрещён", а потому что есть знак "Движение прямо". Желательно указывать реальные ограничения манёвров.
Leo Slager (2022-09-29 10:59:02+00:00): Hi Jeroen,
Rondom Club Organza is een groot meer ontstaan.
JJJWegdam (2022-09-29 18:36:52+00:00): Had m al in de gaten. Het gat in de dijk is inmiddels gedicht middels changeset 1098794189. Toch bedankt
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
anakes (2022-09-29 12:37:51+00:00): Se le ha informado que esta edición carece de información real y carente de planos oficiales para su ubicación en OpenStreetMap.

Las ediciones relacionadas sobre infraestructura férrea sin base de datos y cartografía oficial serán consideradas vandalismo, y con ello la denuncia de la cuenta.
MxxCon (2022-09-27 04:49:39+00:00): Hello.
Is this footpath not lead to this building's entrance?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678105
osmkarl (2022-09-27 19:12:50+00:00): It does. Corrected.
archpdx (2022-09-27 04:21:47+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! What is the source for this change? According to street-level imagery from last year, there seems to be a sidewalk on the right side of the road and there isn't signage prohibiting bikes and pedestrians along this stretch.
ikopanjirukmana (2022-09-27 07:09:03+00:00): Hi,
I saw you added buildings and pedestrians, I appreciate it! However, I notice that most of your pedestrians do not link to the main route and instead run along the coast. It will be a disjointed path. Please double-check them. thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678206
archpdx (2022-09-27 04:28:01+00:00): Hi,
Please note in the future that we don't delete roads on private property in OSM but instead change the Allowed Access to 'private', see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Allison P (2022-09-28 12:45:58+00:00): It looks like that segment is a shared private driveway, so not part of the road.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-09 04:10:40+00:00): What is the purpose of this edit?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678484
ptarac (2022-09-29 17:42:02+00:00): Dzień dobry,
Proszę o informację czy AED znajduje się na pojeździe ratowniczo-gaśniczym?
MxxCon (2022-09-27 04:54:19+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "crossing=marked" is intended specifically for crosswalks with STOP sign.
Crosswalks that are controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as "crossing=traffic_signals". 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678562
osmkarl (2022-09-27 19:16:44+00:00): Thanks. Verified crossing is now properly marked.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-28 12:46:46+00:00): por favor, não coloque nomes comuns como "árvore", neste caso deixe sem nome
Anasantos12 (2022-09-28 13:30:07+00:00): Certo! Desculpe, foi o meu primeiro mapeamento e, tive dificuldades em relação as informações quanto aos códigos.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
flohoff (2022-09-27 08:36:48+00:00): Moin,
das dingen was du hier gelöscht hast war bestandteil einer changeset Diskussion ;) 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126538271

Aber ist richtig - das dingen war kaputt :)
highflyer74 (2022-09-27 08:40:34+00:00): Ja genau, deshalb hatte ich dich ja vorher in dem anderen CS angeschrieben, da ich mir nicht sicher war, ob du das händisch machen möchtest, oder so viel kaputt ist, dass du einen Revert bevorzugst (dann hätte ich nichts angefasst, um Konflikte zu vermeiden). Aber da deine Antwort nicht nach Revert klang, habe ich das offensichtlich Falsche eben gefixt :-)
flohoff (2022-09-27 08:43:39+00:00): Nein - alles gut - Das gehörte schon raus. Wollte ja eigentlich dem eintragenden Kollegen die chance geben. Aber keine ahnung wo das verloren geht. :)

Ich tippe drauf das der mit seinem WoMo unterweg ist und zwar mit OsmAND/Vespucci einträgt aber seine EMails nicht liest.

Flo
ikopanjirukmana (2022-09-27 07:03:42+00:00): Hi,
I saw you added buildings and pedestrians, I appreciate it! However, I notice that most of your pedestrians do not link to the main route and instead run along the coast. It will be a disjointed path. Please double-check them. thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126679046