piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marnov (2018-11-05 17:20:32+00:00): Dobrý den, ok děkuji asi máte pravdu. Měl jsem za to, že by to mělo být jak je to na cedulích, ale co píšete je logické, děkuji za upozornění :-). 
Ještě se zeptám, jak je to se zkratkami na cedulích např. když je na ceduli Hr. Králové, má se to zapsat tak je to na ceduli, nebo napsat celé Hradec Králové? 
Díky
Piskvor (2018-11-05 17:32:18+00:00): Zkratky se, podle wiki OSM, mají vypisovat (to zase překvapilo mě): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:destination - taky bych řekl, že by měly být tak, jak jsou na značce, ale 20:1 jsou rozepsané. Co se shody s terénním stavem týče, jsem pro; v případě velkých písmen to ale považuji spíše za typografické stanovení pro značku, právě kvůli čitelnosti: město se jmenuje "Brno," jen s jedním velkým písmenem. Kvůli téže čitelnosti (ať už v navigaci nebo pro strojové zpracování) bych byl pro zápis obvyklým způsobem...a i kvůli tomu, že je tak zapsána většina značení, předělávat celou republiku bych nechtěl.
marnov (2018-11-05 17:48:44+00:00): Díky, také jsem spíš pro zápis, tak jak je to na značce, tedy vč. zkratek. 
Z hlediska čitelnosti souhlasím, první písmeno velké další malá. 
Každopádně díky za info, pořád se učím nové věci :-)
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-07 20:37:03+00:00): Hello,
You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84638730/history from a grade4 track to a service road.  Can you explain what your source was for doing that?
Best Regards,
Andy
nemca (2018-11-09 11:57:27+00:00): Hi Andy, I was told so by the driver. I will double check. Petr
Jose Luis Infante (2018-11-05 18:16:37+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tu aportacion.
Solo comentar que seguramente el edificio no se llame "ITEM FORMACION", como has indicado. En el caso de que sea una academia de formación, habría que añadir un punto (dentro del edificio) con los datos de la academia. Las academias de formación se etiquetan como office=educational_institution.
Un saludo!
GOwin (2018-12-24 12:54:51+00:00): Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64197629
rab (2018-11-05 18:33:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25116638

building=yes?
GypseysWhippet (2018-11-06 13:52:27+00:00): yes
rab (2018-11-07 16:52:03+00:00): I think not
Austin Zhu (2019-03-14 12:37:33+00:00): Please include 市 in City and 县 county names
Otherwise it'll cause confusion
katpatuka (2019-03-14 14:00:35+00:00): Ok ok, FreedSky told me already some weeks ago... 

;)
maraf24 (2018-11-11 11:15:27+00:00): None of your changes are true. This is not a station, but halt.
The building is closed indefinitely, and we don't put station tags on building stations.
Vitru (2018-11-05 19:17:47+00:00): Are you not fearing that a gunman could use this information and hunt down those LGBTQ bars?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-11-05 19:53:49+00:00): I am adding lgbtq=primary to venues which are already tagged gay=yes.

On the tagging mailing list ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/040144.html ), I suggest:

"*When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a gay
bar can be easily identified by a prominent rainbow flag. Some cultures
are less accepting, so bars might not be so blatant (I've seen this in
the EU). Using the common OSM rules of "local knowledge", people within
the local LGBTQ community are probably the best place to make a final call."

In this changeset, I'm only adding tags in the USA, and if you look at them, they all prominantly descirbe themselves as gay/LGBTQ bars. I don't think this is increasing the danger of anyone.

There are benefits to tagging LGBTQ bars in OSM.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-06 00:27:28+00:00): Please don't connect landuse areas like parking lots to highway centerlines, the edges of areas should be the actual edges of the area, not the middle of the adjacent road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64198686
Kirdro (2018-11-09 19:14:42+00:00): I blame the proximity snapping! (Or me being lazy and accepting the snap points rather than doing it right.) Corrected, and noted for the future.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-11 05:43:55+00:00): Id is seriously awful for that if you're not zoomed in sufficiently;  zooming in more or using a different editor like JOSM may help.
user_5359 (2021-08-03 15:40:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6039313663/history. What is the meaning of the tag false=A?
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
rab (2018-11-05 17:13:40+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcKewl94jR4
tux67 (2018-11-05 16:50:30+00:00): Damit die Eingänge nicht in der Luft hängen sollten sie auf den Landuse und einen Zugangsweg gelegt werden. Für den Haupteingang und den von der Stoltenhoffstraße habe ich das gemacht. Der Weg von der Kamphausener Höhe läßt sich nicht erkennen. Ist die Stelle für den Entrance node 100% riichtig?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64199336
WolfGb (2018-11-05 19:34:37+00:00): Die Position ist richtig.
Die Luftaufnahme gibt das nicht her.
Wäre auf dem Friedhofswegeplan ersichtlich gewesen
tux67 (2018-11-05 20:16:37+00:00): Das der Plan ohne Erlaubnis ja nicht genutzt werden kann, haben wir jetzt 2 korrekt gemappe Zugänge und einen der  im Nichts schwebt.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-07 21:39:54+00:00): COnferi os dados, você deixou umas vias desconectadas das outras, mas já corrigi ;)
jwilliansilvabr1988 (2018-11-07 21:50:44+00:00): Ah sim, eu ia ver mesmo sobre isso de conexões de vias. E como procedo pra cadastrar nome de bairros, se é na opção PONTO ou opção ÁREA. Deixa o help aí depois.
santamariense (2018-11-08 13:30:26+00:00): @jwilliansilvabr1988 . Se souber a área, sempre é preferível ela. Mas não pode ser no achismo, tem que ter uma fonte. Quando não se sabe os limites usa-se ponto. Ou as vezes, usa-se ambos. É preciso analisar cada caso pois existem bairros oficiais e não oficiais. No OSM tem-se praticado mapeá-los de forma distinta.

Fortemente te sugiro participar e tirar dúvidas nos grupos no Telegram. Principamente o "suporte" para tirar dúvidas. 

A lista de grupos pode ser vista em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-08 14:00:11+00:00): No OSM temos pontos, vias (conjuntos de pontos ligados), áreas (conjunto de pontos ligados que criam uma área fechada), relações (agrupamento de pontos e/ou áreas e/ou vias). Para criar um bairro creio que a melhor representação seria uma relação. Pois um bairro assim como um municipio ou estado, pode ter seus limites definidos através de uma via, um rio ou uma lnha imaginária (sem categoria). Você pode ler mais sobre relações aqui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Relation
jwilliansilvabr1988 (2018-11-12 13:28:46+00:00): Agradeço pessoal, mas não entendi isso de "achismo", pois nesse dia até dialoguei com a pessoa que cuida do bairro. Mas pelo menos aqui na cidade tudo está oficializado, essa questão de nomes. Agradeço vocês.
santamariense (2018-11-13 00:11:12+00:00): Legal. Só explicando o "achismo", eu quis dizer que se tu souber os limites dos bairros, desenha a área, se não souber desenha ponto. A disposição caso tenha dúvidas.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_3022894 (2019-08-27 12:53:23+00:00): Hi EvanE,
es ist ein bisschen spät, aber zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1364648630 wollte ich nur sagen, dass, wenn du auf ein "crossing=island;traffic_signals" stößt, du daraus crossing=traffic_signals zusammen mit (jetzt kommt das Wichtige) crossing:island=yes machen kannst. Nur, falls dir so etwas nochmal begegnen sollte.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
tux67 (2018-11-05 15:14:28+00:00): Hier liegt jetzt ein "Gartenbau Heym" POI auf der Straße und daneben ist ein Florist Lang .. ist das so gewollt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64199516
WolfGb (2018-11-05 19:29:06+00:00): ja das ist richtig.
Die Straße ist die Zufahrt zum Gartenbaubetrieb.
Blumen Lang ist ein Blumenladen.
2 verschiedene Firmen
tux67 (2018-11-05 20:11:48+00:00): Dann bitte die Geschäftsräume mappen und nicht die Straße.
BCNorwich (2018-11-05 19:22:04+00:00): Hi, slight amendment to the opening hours to suit OSM best practice.
Regards Bernard
EvanE (2018-11-06 03:57:43+00:00): Hello eastender 

Why did you added direction to all ways of the Flixbus 814 route? 

This is a route using Public Transport version 2 (short PTv2). This means in short: 
  -  One route relation per direction, 
  -  stops at the beginning, 
  -  ways in the order the bus uses the ways. 

Because of the ordered nature of PTv2 route relation there is no need for describing wether a way is used in forward or backward direction (which was useful/necassary in earlier PT versions). 

In fact using roles forward/backward is considered an error for route relation using the PTv2 standard.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport 

Please can you be so kind, to revert your change / changeset. 

Edbert, 
who closed some gaps in Flixbus 814 route a few weeks ago.
eastender (2018-11-06 10:42:55+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. I have reverted my changes, to make the route relation PTv2 compliant.
EvanE (2018-11-07 03:36:59+00:00): Thank you for undoing your changes this fast.

If you are interested in long distance bus routes, there exist an analysis of the Fixbus lines: 

https://mipv6.de/OSM/analyze-routes/EU-Flixbus-Analysis.html 

Edbert
eastender (2018-11-07 19:56:01+00:00): Thanks. My current focus is on improving the mapping of Victoria Coach Station (arrivals and departures) and the coach routes through the coach station. That analysis report usefully highlights a further improvement needed to the access tags within the coach station, which I should hopefully have applied before the next analysis report is generated.
EvanE (2018-11-10 01:18:50+00:00): Victoria Coach Station is a problem that I couldn't solve from the distance. There might be similar as many lines like in Munich or Berlin. 

The address of the analysis report has changed on Nov. 8th to 
http://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/EU-Flixbus-Analysis.html

Hopefully this address will last for a while. 

Edbert
eastender (2018-11-10 16:13:51+00:00): Thanks. I wondered where the analysis report had been moved to. I have now fixed the access issue at Victoria Coach Station and the analysis report is free of warnings, with respect to the coach station.
cyngrrl (2021-02-25 16:19:08+00:00): This is not a trail. It leads directly through a private home and into a private gated community with posted no trespassing and no hiking access signs. Please remove, the residents have continuing problems with trespassers.
ezekielf (2021-02-25 21:52:27+00:00): It looks like you've already changed the way in question from a footway to an underground gas pipeline which doesn't make much sense:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641239652/history
cyngrrl (2021-02-25 22:29:10+00:00): The pathway marked is not a foot trail for public use, it is an egress for a gas line. The pathway is marked from the Canyon Trail throufh private property to a private road. The resident of the gated private area have had issues with hikers using this non-trail. Posted trespassing sign have not helped much. I am new to marking up this map so eager to learn how to better remove this - iy gets picked up by other apps (namely AllTrails).
ezekielf (2021-02-26 00:19:43+00:00): Apologies!  I assumed changing it to a gas pipeline was a mistake since the changeset comments didn't say anything about pipelines and it doesn't connect to a greater pipeline network.  

If the trail doesn't physically exist anymore you can just delete the way (unless you feel that documenting the pipeline is important).  If the trail is still there but only for use by the property owners you can tag it with "access=private".  That means the general public is not allowed.  

Feel free to join the OpenStreetMap slack https://slack.openstreetmap.us/.  Lots of friendly folks there available to answer questions.

AllTrails is generally very bad about updating their data, unfortunately.  You may have to contact them directly.
eggie (2018-11-05 14:57:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-05 15:03:29+00:00): Alle gebouwen in OSM zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. het heeft daarom weinig zin om gebouwen te gaan aanpassen. De edits van voorgaande mapper waren een rommeltje zaq ik. Misschien is het wel gewoon beter om de gebouwen opnieuw te importeren. Dit kan op het forum van OSM middels een verzoek in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Je zet dan deze link erbij. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64200022#map=17/52.29352/4.95883

Het forum vind je hier. Inlog identiek aan OSM account met enige vertraging door accountcheck.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-11-05 19:14:03+00:00): Boa tarde Néio, reparei que eliminou um edifício nesta edição. os elementos existentes nunca devem ser apagados (excepto se deixarem de existir, o que não é o caso). Noutra edição você criou um edifício dentro de outro edifício, o que não faz sentido algum. Para adicionar restaurantes adicione como ponto e depois a categoria. um edifício pode ter múltiplas funções, sendo por isso incorrecto a forma como você editou. Vou reverter as suas edições incorrectas. Se tiver dúvidas, contacte que terei todo o gosto em ajudar e elucidar.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
atcomapper (2018-11-07 18:21:31+00:00): Please do not merge addresses with buildings in Denmark!! Danish addresses are imported automatically, and should only exist as nodes, not as areas. Now there are 41 duplicate addresses in this area because the address nodes were automatically imported again after you removed them. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark
Druzhba (2018-11-07 20:31:58+00:00): Why are you not keeping both address nodes and ways in Denmark? It would be hugely beneficial to have address data at the buildings.
atcomapper (2018-11-08 04:32:55+00:00): To avoid data duplication, and because maintaining address data on buildings would require an unreasonably large manual effort. There are several hundred changes to address data in Denmark every week, which are automatically imported into osm. This is not possible to do on buildings. Besides, an address Denmark is legally defined as a point; a building can have several addresses associated, or no addresses and an address can also exist without there being a building at all.
Druzhba (2018-11-08 12:15:32+00:00): Shouldn't it be possible to associate buildings with their address nodes through relations?
atcomapper (2018-11-08 15:04:30+00:00): Sure, but that's another situation entirely. AFAIK no wide spread scheme for associating address nodes with buildings or other entities currently exists.
eggie (2018-11-05 15:09:06+00:00): Hi.. In the Netherland is the policy to tag at the addressnode from the Dutch Kadaster and not at the buildingshape.
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-05 15:14:22+00:00): reverted due to delete addressnodes by changeset #64201058 
Your company info is still at the addressnode.
Aycup ® (2018-11-05 15:52:58+00:00): https://www.aycup.com.tr
user_390227 (2018-11-19 16:44:06+00:00): Dieses Gleis wird für die historischen Straßenbahnen immer noch genutzt. Daher railway=tram
mtmail (2018-11-18 15:08:52+00:00): Can you add details on what changed in the changeset comments? "Hildesheim, Germany" doesn't give enough information. It looks like the population number got updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18318938/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-11-15 08:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64516990 where the changeset comment is: Reverting unsourced edits around Bulgaria.  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed
MadMAX (2018-11-05 20:57:18+00:00): Здравей,
"надлез Кракра", който си изтрил се строи в момента и е отразен в проекта за бул. Левски.

http://agup.varna.bg/attachments/article/642/bul.Levski_SIT+ND_(final)5-A2-ALL.pdf
plamen (2018-11-06 05:58:54+00:00): OK, съжалявам, върнал съм го.
A67-A67 (2018-11-05 16:50:21+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Iemand lijkt de adressen weer verwijderd te hebben, volgens het changeset-commentaar vooral omdat deze way is verwijderd (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641245929).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64202935
eggie (2018-11-05 16:57:43+00:00): Van uit de Italiaanse community kwam later hetzelfde bezwaar.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9001947
Zal nog even kijken, want ik had juist office=company toegevoegd op de adresnode.
eggie (2018-11-05 17:04:14+00:00): Terugdraaien..? Ik wil dat works wel erbij taggen. 
Sinds google de rekening heeft verhoogd is er een hause aan bedrijventags.
eggie (2018-11-05 17:08:35+00:00): Mapper reageert op geen enkele vraag uit de community.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6719766
eggie (2018-11-05 17:15:41+00:00): Adresnode 125 ook hersteld en duplikaat adres verwijderd
A67-A67 (2018-11-05 19:32:27+00:00): Bedankt voor het oplossen. Ik probeerde het ook al in JOSM, maar de reverter-plugin deed niet wat ik wilde.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-11-15 08:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64516990 where the changeset comment is: Reverting unsourced edits around Bulgaria.  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed
Alecs01 (2018-11-05 19:39:19+00:00): Ciao, anche se è chiuso lascerei l'indirizzo, cancellando semplicemente gli altri tags, il posto continua comunque ad avere un indirizzo, è un'informazione che può essere utile
viloan (2018-11-05 15:38:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eserte (2018-11-07 19:59:18+00:00): Warum wurde der oneway-Tag in der Bouchéstr. entfernt? Gestern war da noch eine Einbahnstraße.
Supaplex030 (2018-11-07 21:48:37+00:00): Hey, du meinst, du hast gestern noch eine Einbahnstraße zwischen Heidelberger und Harzer Straße gesehen? Wenn du dir sicher bist, nehme ich sie wieder herein, aber ich war am Montag dort und meinte, keine mehr gesehen zu haben (obwohl die große Baustelle im Bereich der Nummer 39 weiterhin die Straße etwas verengt...) Ansonsten kann ich dort auch nochmal nachsehen demnächst.
eserte (2018-11-07 21:54:44+00:00): Die Einbahnstraße fängt erst an der Schmollerstraße an (das war schon immer so), und ja, ich habe gestern an der Ecke Bouché/Schmoller ein "Einfahrt verboten"-Schild gesehen.
Supaplex030 (2018-11-07 21:59:23+00:00): Alles klar, dann habe ich nicht gut geschaut vor Ort. Habe sie zwischen Schmoller- und Harzer Straße wieder eingetragen (von Süd nach Nord befahrbar). Neu eingetragen habe ich am Montag auch die temporäre Einbahnstraße in der Mengerzeile - da bin ich mir aber sicher ;)
Supaplex030 (2018-11-07 22:00:37+00:00): Und ein Teilstück des Schmollerplatz - auch wegen der Baustelle dort.
eserte (2018-11-07 22:04:39+00:00): Ja, Mengerzeile & Schmollerplatz kann ich auch bestätigen.
mweper (2018-11-06 11:35:20+00:00): Bienvenido a la comunidad de OSM y gracias por colaborar.
-
¿Sabes el nombre completo y sin abreviaciones de la calle? Es conveniente añadir todo el nombre completo en la etiqueta official_name=* y dejar en name=*, sólo el nombre por el que se lo conoce más.
-
Si se cambia el nombre de la calle, también se deberían cambiar los nodos de alturas y PDIs relacionados a la misma, eso lo puedo hacer yo si quieres.
-
Cualquier duda que tengas, me puedes contactar a mi (a través de mi perfil) o a la comunidad ( https://t.me/osm_ar ). Saludos.
viloan (2018-11-05 15:49:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2018-11-05 23:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mike Baggaley (2018-11-06 19:41:39+00:00): HI way 202388327 in Morrisons has had access=no added, but it still has bicycle=yes. I assume either that both pedestrians and bicycles are allowed, or both are not, but the current tags deny pedestrians and allow bicycles. Can you please review? Thanks,
Mike
R0bst3r (2018-11-06 10:58:21+00:00): Hallo maas-naturwaren,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64202299
mueschel (2018-11-07 11:40:10+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "addr_ward" ~100 times. This should be "addr:ward". Could you have a look and fix these?
abrensch (2018-12-30 10:49:07+00:00): Hallo sHolli,

weisst Du, ob der Bergfahrweg jetzt wieder frei ist?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
sHolli (2018-12-30 21:58:26+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
leider ist die Straße immernoch gesperrt. Am Januar soll noch gebohrt werden und danach werden weitere Fangnetze installiert. Dann wird man weiter sehen. Es dauert wohl noch.

Gruß Holger
abrensch (2019-04-14 09:37:41+00:00): "Ende April" habe ich jetzt recherchiert, und das Opening Date an dem Way so gesetzt.