piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emvee (2019-11-08 11:02:15+00:00): Hi danilolessa,

Thanks for updating openstreetmap to indicate where in São Paulo you can cycle using "cycleway:right=shoulder"!

One remark on bicycle=use_sidepath. This tag should not be used unless there is a seperate sidepath, see bicycle=use_sidepath, it means something like bicycle=no and that does not match cycleway:right=shoulder

I am trying to fix these problem world-wide and São Paulo is number 1 ;-)

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=3032&class=30329

Greetings,

Martin.
danlessa (2019-11-09 12:57:54+00:00): Hi Martin! Thanks for the note.

What's the best practice then? Bicycle=yes?

The situation on the road is that there is a lot of highways in São Paulo which have shoulders, and a lot of road cyclists go through them.

Riding on the highways isn't exactly an pleasant experience, and there is a lot of grey area surrounding cycling on it. Nevertheless, it is where the people go for riding
emvee (2019-11-09 13:30:39+00:00): Yes, better change bicycle=use_sidepath into bicycle=yes or remove the bicycle tag. 

For ways with "highway=motorway" that is necessary as the default restrictions for motorways is not to allow bicycles, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_Restrictions but for highway=primary/seconday/tertiary you could remove the bicycle tag completely.

To indicate that it is not exactly an pleasant experience, you could use class:bicycle=-2 or class:bicycle=-3, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle
danlessa (2019-11-09 13:49:04+00:00): Thanks for the references! 

I'll use these recommendations for the next changes
emvee (2019-11-09 15:16:15+00:00): Just for your reference, I see you are using JOSM: You can download all ways with "problems" using File->Download, Download from Overpass API and then enter:

[out:xml][timeout:90][bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
  way["bicycle"="use_sidepath"]["cycleway:right"="shoulder"];
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

Also Osmose can show you a map
emvee (2019-12-07 11:51:58+00:00): Do you have any problem if I change these objects, that is, remove bicycle=use_sidepath?

For ways tagged as "highway=motorway" I will then and add bicycle=yes + class:bicycle=-2
emvee (2020-03-08 11:19:24+00:00): Hi danilolessa,

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=3032&class=30329 is almost clean apart from Sao Paulo.

I plan to remove "bicycle=use_sidepath" from these roads because:
1) There is no side-path (a shoulder is part of the way)
2) "bicycle=use_sidepath" is interpreted by routers as "bicycle=no" and this changeset indicates you are allowed to cycle there
3) "bicycle=use_sidepath" if there is a law that tells a cyclist to use the sidepath instead of the normal road, AFAIK that is not the case for Sao Paulo
danlessa (2020-07-16 00:03:52+00:00): Hey emvee, I've just updated it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88054258
emvee (2020-07-16 17:23:10+00:00): Thanks, apart from bicycle=yes also class:bicycle=-2 added I see, good!

Greetings,

Martin.
emvee (2020-07-18 07:58:42+00:00): It took some time for Osmose to update and the great majority of the problem is gone, but I still see in the order of 50 roads tagged with "bicycle=use_sidepath with cycleway:right=shoulder"

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=37211&item=3032&class=30329

See above, it is easy to load those ways in JOSM, could you fix those ~50 remaining ways also?

Thanks,

Martin.
danlessa (2020-07-19 16:35:06+00:00): Just did that, Thanks Martin for the tips!
ftrebien (2020-07-20 01:31:41+00:00): Please don't do mass edits without checking definitions and common practice first. Also, do get in touch with the local community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato
danlessa (2020-07-20 13:16:20+00:00): Thanks, I'll get in touch
Kerlando (2019-06-11 03:20:41+00:00): #ColumbiaCollegeEM220
AgusQui (2020-04-04 06:00:18+00:00): las rutas sin pavimentar van como tertiary segun convencion Argentina
richardninde (2019-06-12 19:33:48+00:00): Hi Sal,

I'd love to discuss the decision to use tertiary_link for the roads bypassing the roundabout here. 

My first reaction was to treat them as a frontage roads and call them tertiary, since a lot of residential roads connect with them. 

Please feel free to send me a message on OSM to discuss it further.
mavl (2019-06-11 15:03:40+00:00): Hello. This changeset adds unknown objects with the unusual tags. Please, use OSM tags:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features  
  
Vladimir Marshinin  
Data Working Group
mavl (2019-06-11 19:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 71149918, 71155287, 71151809, 71153632, 71147485, 71145446 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
AkuAnakTimur (2019-06-11 08:54:36+00:00): Source of street name?
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
oba510 (2019-06-12 08:23:31+00:00): You turned a closed Burger King tagged as disused:amenity=fast_food into a non-disused Burger King. I walked past this place today (twice!) and can assure you that it has been completely boarded up for a while, and is not in any way an active Burger King restaurant.  Please pay more attention to what you're doing and look at the history of things you're not familiar with before making changes like this .
InsertUser (2019-06-11 18:02:31+00:00): This is incorrect. These are rectangular ways with water in the middle, not larger rectangular piers.
sportyAT (2019-06-12 21:33:21+00:00): Hi InsertUser, thanks for the correction here.
mavl (2019-06-11 19:49:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 71149918, 71155287, 71151809, 71153632, 71147485, 71145446 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-06-11 19:49:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 71149918, 71155287, 71151809, 71153632, 71147485, 71145446 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mbethke (2019-06-11 07:37:33+00:00): Dear Ameliawelikala,
while this edit looks genuine to me (i.e. not a Google Maps copy), you're still putting that bogus operator tag in there. Stop it, please. It takes about half a minute to remove all operator tags from everything you've ever edited, but I'd rather you wouldn't treat this as a graffiti tagging contest.

cheers,
Matthias
seattlefyi (2019-06-11 16:03:00+00:00): Hi, saw the website addition, thanks again. If you're interested in learning a bit more, that Lucille building is actually bigger than currently shown on the OSM map (and Bing imagery). In iD Editor, if you select "Background Settings" (or press B), you can switch imagery layers. "Mapbox" layer has a good view of the new building footprint under construction with no parallax. (Enlarging the building might involve deleting a couple of the neighboring houses.) If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
Hjart (2019-06-11 16:18:12+00:00): Hvis du højreklikker på området kommer der en menu frem ved musen. Den øverste ikon hedder "Cirkulariser" ;-)
MrManor (2019-06-11 17:23:16+00:00): Ahh.. bingo. Jeg tænkte nok der var en måde, men havde ikke opdaget højremenuen. - Tak
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
pilsa (2019-06-12 06:12:35+00:00): دوست عزیز اسم روی تابلو ملاک هستش.شما اسم بلوار امام زاده محمد رو باید در loc name قرار بدید.از این بلوار مپیلاری تهیه شده .نگاه کردن بهش وقتی نمیگیره.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71126301
mavl (2019-07-21 16:06:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:24:29+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:24:32+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:24:34+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
Takogin (2019-06-17 13:22:56+00:00): Please, don't add spam names to areas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71126833
eggie (2019-06-11 08:43:24+00:00): Dag Harm de Heer.. Kleine aanpassing verricht. 
De info heb ik even samengevoegd met de officiële adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-11 08:21:00+00:00): Dit is wat er gebeurd is.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71127562

De landuse=residential is omgetagd naar leisure=pitch

Ik kijk even verder of het nog hersteld moet worden
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-06-11 08:26:30+00:00): Je hebt het zelf al hersteld zie ik.. :)

Mvg,
Eggie
Cyclono (2019-06-11 08:37:50+00:00): Ja, ik zag het :) Bedankt voor het kijken!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-12 23:49:26+00:00): Note: Mapper has contacted me via private message regarding this removal requesting a way to upload photos of the location. I have provided several options and offered to assist as required when it comes to getting correct data onto the map.

I still consider this removal valid as each time the mapper has modified this location their changes have been significantly different with the boundaries of the "park" and footways varying wildly.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-13 05:47:22+00:00): I am also attempting to make direct contact with the City of Centralia's "See Centralia" service in order to gain more information on this location regarding both the park and the Bed and Breakfast
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-13 12:12:42+00:00): The mapper in question has now sent me another private message threatening that they and their friends will mass report me for this changeset.

For the sake of record keeping the same user:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69878880
Changed park to landuse=military on way 584066649
Removed existing parks (ways
637264499 and 468888198)

Added a park at this same location but with totally different geometry:
69891502

The same location has been subject to vandalism, including writing with footways and multiple fake parks added by other users with similar naming schemes such as harryrooster1990.

I am happy to discuss this matter with any member of the DWG at any time.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-14 00:06:09+00:00): Response received from Economic Development Director for the City of Centralia stating that they are not presently aware of either Dogwood B&B or Meadow Park, but will investigate further
Adamant1 (2019-06-14 02:29:25+00:00): I think if your contacting city officials over some troll Pokemon Go fake park mappers your taking this way to seriously and probably won't get much else done because you'll be spending all your time on none sense. It's much better to just delete, ignore, and move on. They want to you to get wrapped up in that kind of circular stuff and your just playing into their hands by doing it. Just my two sense.
Adamant1 (2019-06-14 02:30:41+00:00): Btw, they will never contact the DWG either. Know one that threatens to ever does. It's just a bullying tactic. Its best to just ignore it.
freebeer (2019-06-14 15:01:21+00:00): adam, woody is publicly documenting what is happening out-of-sight, which will help the dwg in case they need to again take action as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549033571/history and the relevant changeset discussions.

it is part of the Open of osm, and keeps mappers civil.  sometimes.

note that contacting the officials could help the vandalism backfire even more spectacularly as an unregistered business.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-18 06:22:14+00:00): I have received a response from the Economic Development Developer (who has been extremely helpful). There is no B&B at this location at this time, and there is no park as either the local government or OSM defines it.

Adamant1, point well taken - in most cases of obvious Pokemon Go inspired vandalism, I completely agree. However, as the OSM wiki describes, I do try to give the benefit of the doubt where I can. In this particular case, the vandal had gone to the extent of doctoring images, creating a website and listing false details about this location on other databases/services. If nothing else, one has to admire their determination and creativity.
Adamant1 (2020-01-09 04:12:50+00:00): Hhhmm, well WoodwoseWulf, what about the "Blueberry Garden" and other clearly Pokemon Go gruff, including the paths, that have replaced it? Time to call the Economic Development Developer this again to see if this place is a blueberry garden? Then maybe in 7 more months they can be called again to check if its whatever landuse the user decides to go with next. I agree, determination and creativity on their part indeed ;)
WoodWoseWulf (2020-01-09 22:51:27+00:00): Provided this mapper doesn't add anything else to this location which will send people on a wild goose chase looking for non-existent bed and breakfast business or park, I'm done with this location.

I've taken SomeoneElse's comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73595085 as essentially hinting that they're more or less the same.

Is it ideal? No.
Is what is mapped here useful? No.
Am I happy about the outcome? No.
Do I have better things to spend my time on here than arguing with some fopdoodle over the sketchy use of leisure=garden on the side of their house when no one else seems to care either way? Yes.
Adamant1 (2020-01-11 09:00:54+00:00): "Thumbs up emoji"
freebeer (2020-01-12 09:51:16+00:00): > "Thumbs up emoji"
freebeer (2020-01-12 10:01:15+00:00): what the bl**dy f*???  ghost-touch has infected a further device.  take two:

> "Thumbs up emoji"

shows up as a black box with my device font.  are people going to start using obscure emojis to replace entire words soon rather than bothering to type out the full word?  i say, when i was young, we had to bang out our bits with pieces of rock; paper and scissors not having been invented yet.

i hope that the two of you will not mind if i decide to harbour a grudge and continue the crusade of reverts of bogus and/or private info, as i suspect these footpaths are not open to the public as the map rendering applies.  now if only i could be arsed to overcome the last unmet dependency to get the revert scripts fully functional, then i can wreak havoc again across vast stretches of tourist amenities at null island and lakes drowning out shopping centres and residences like i've been threatening  or i could get a life instead, too.

nah.  cockwombles deserve a good and persistent stalking.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-01-16 07:26:34+00:00): @freebeer - by all means, be my guest :D

Keep in mind that in this case, the mapper is a rampant sock-puppeteer and has continued to attempt to make strange changes as recently as a couple of months ago such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77344731

Unfortunately, for the OSM community, games like Pokemon GO encourage a culture of multi-accounting (despite it being against the terms of service) and an often unhealthy level of persistence which often seems to translate to some cases of prolonged vandalism such as this location; as well as Akron, Indiana; and of course the very persistent "Rochester Vandal" in Michigan.
freebeer (2020-01-20 09:06:04+00:00): is Rochester still a Thing?  I thought that sock-puppetry had ceased, based on the lack of new user blocks since a three-pronged (at least) attack on that vandal's changes one nice day some months back.  Well, it was probably rainy.  First and only time I was involved.

Your work here is appreciated, much like TravGW whom I don't recall noticing in my recent sporadic forays back into OSM culture.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-01-20 11:47:28+00:00): Rochester kind of petered out after that day you mentioned. But as a whole Rochester is a case study on Pokemon GO (and more broadly, gameification-inspired) vandalism at its worst. By some miracle, Niantic actually updated the map data they (still) use while the vandal was active, but somehow none of their bad changes made it in.

TravGW is still active, but Pokemon Vandalism seems to be a bit subdued for now. The decline in shenanigans seems to have coincided with Niantic opening up their "Wayfarer" reviewing and POI submission tools for Pokemon GO players, which in-turn seems to have redirected a lot of the mischief and desperation onto Niantic's own platform.

I'm not saying it's stopped, but over the first 3 quarters of 2019 (over 3,000 edits), we saw about a ~1/10 rate of parks added by new users as being fake in Australia, the US, Canada and New Zealand. It's no where near that rate since Wayfarer dropped.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-01-20 11:55:41+00:00): And on "Your work here is appreciated" - 
Thank you, I really appreciate it.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-05-06 04:17:19+00:00): Looks like a lot of the scrappy areas here were removed in the following recent changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84301393
Will have to see how this pans out over the coming weeks.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-06-03 23:20:41+00:00): Aaaaannnd all 527 nodes have been (poorly)  reverted back into existence in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86143199 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 02:14:41+00:00): That was a crap move. I left them a changeset comment and will just delete the stuff again or report them depending on the response.
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 02:15:31+00:00): Although having to delete the 527 empty nodes again is going to be an extreme hassle.
edbort (2020-06-04 02:59:37+00:00): Hello. I apologise for the bad revert. I was only trying to fix the grass areas, gardens, and paths that were wrongly deleted.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-06-15 18:51:45+00:00): ভাই, OSM নিয়ম অনুসারে প্রাথমিক নামটি স্থানীয় লিপিতে অর্থাৎ বাংলায় হবে। যদি অন্যভাষা যেমন ইংরেজি যোগ করতে চান তবে তা " name:en = " ঘরে যোগ করুন।

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Multilingual_names&oldid=1855701#Bangladesh

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
Rob Roy (2019-06-11 06:43:05+00:00): Description should read "Add Guardian Ave Reserve"
user_5359 (2019-06-13 17:42:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Could we have same more information about your guesthouse?
habi (2019-06-11 09:09:41+00:00): Danke!
BCNorwich (2019-06-12 06:57:28+00:00): Hi I corrected your mapping. Removed node, tagged building.
BAK365 (2019-06-11 21:03:14+00:00): Nicht trinkbares Trinkwasser :-). Ich glaube dort steht ein Viehtrog, amenity=watering_place könnte passen.
Grüsse
BAK365
Piagno (2019-06-12 06:58:20+00:00): Hab ich so angepasst :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71167694
aharvey (2019-06-11 13:47:10+00:00): Hey there, I originally mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692588328 but I think the change you made is probably okay, this is a good example of the difficulty in accurately mapping both physical infrastructure, and logical networks for routing etc.
Rob Roy (2019-06-11 23:11:52+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. Feel free to tweak it - I was going to come back and spend more time getting it right around the bus stop / underpass / bridge. Sorry if I wiped your work.
Rob Roy (2019-06-21 03:27:45+00:00): Have now corrected relationship of creek and Underpass in another edit.
BCNorwich (2019-06-12 07:00:57+00:00): Hi I corrected your mapping.
BCNorwich (2019-06-12 07:01:58+00:00): Deleted incorrect lines.
BCNorwich (2019-06-12 07:04:02+00:00): Amended road to track, joined track to road at south.