piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Osm@gps (2021-11-25 21:01:33+00:00): Hi,
ich bin hier neu und mir ist nicht ganz klar was ich tun soll?
Also ich habe noch nie gesehen, dass da in der Woche oder am Wochenende Geld genommen wird. Allerdings war ich auch noch nie da während des Summer Jams oder ähnliches.
Mfg
b-jazz (2021-12-03 18:14:46+00:00): I'm guessing these aren't really curbs, but more appropriately very short walls, right? The fact that the way doubles back on itself (ie. nodes A-B-A) leads me to think this was done on purpose to indicate it is "lower" on both sides. But this triggers various Q/A tools like OSM Inspector since that is invalid topology (as I understand it). So wouldn't a wall be more appropriate here? Or maybe there's another way to keep the Q/A tools happy?
Minh Nguyen (2021-12-03 20:32:40+00:00): They’re more like curbs than walls, hence the kerb:height=6" tags. They’re tapered so that emergency vehicles and delivery vans can back in directly from the through lanes. Here’s what they look like on the ground:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frontage_lane_on_South_11th_Street_before_San_Fernando_Street,_San_Jose,_California.jpg

It’s awkward because barrier=kerb was defined with the assumption that a curb separates a sidewalk from the street, oblivious to this kind of divider. There’s some additional discussion on this topic on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:kerb#.22Double_sided.22_kerbs

Maybe it would be better to add a tag indicating that it’s double-sided?
b-jazz (2021-12-05 17:33:34+00:00): A double sided tag seems like the right answer to me. In the meantime, maybe they can be represented with parallel lines separated by a small distance?
Minh Nguyen (2021-12-05 22:46:52+00:00): Parallel lines would represent these standalone curbs too similarly to curbs that surround a traffic island, but anyways Bing imagery doesn’t have high enough resolution to distinguish the gaps in the curbs that allow stormwater to pass through, let alone the edges of the curbs.

In changeset 114597028, I split up the ways so that they don’t double back on themselves. That should satisfy any validator for topology, though there are still coincident curbs.
waldhans (2021-11-29 20:49:48+00:00): führt die Kommune das als 2 Plätze? Dein Kommentar "Attributergänzung aus der Kommune" legt das ja nah!

lt. Webseit nicht!
RoKo58 (2021-12-01 08:30:07+00:00): 
Danke für den Hinweis! geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114433415
Gruß Rolf
RicoElectrico (2021-11-23 18:40:28+00:00): Hej, pozwoliłem sobie zrobić małą poprawkę, bo zniknął tag oznaczający klasę drogi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330071948/history
waldhans (2021-11-29 20:55:33+00:00): führt die Kommune das als 2 Plätze? Dein Kommentar "Attributergänzung aus der Kommune" legt das ja nah! Lt. Website nicht!
RoKo58 (2021-12-01 08:03:41+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114432516
Gruß Rolf
waldhans (2021-11-29 20:48:30+00:00): führt die Kommune das als 2 Plätze? Dein Kommentar "Attributergänzung aus der Kommune" legt das ja nah!
RoKo58 (2021-12-01 10:55:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114438666
Gruß Rolf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ravali_78 (2021-11-24 08:04:46+00:00): HI Nurwinda Sari,
I have Fixed the classification gaps and incorrectly tagged highways.Kindly check with way 1005506177,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114170403.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114128668
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:25:49+00:00): Hi, 
zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Damit Öffnungszeiten möglichst einfach ausgewertet werden können, ist ein einheitliches Format wichtig. Mehr Infos zu diesem Format findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Kannst du die Zeiten dementsprechend anpassen?

Gruß
winkeldings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
czubi (2021-11-27 11:06:09+00:00): Hallo Tigerin,
ich glaube hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2305800651#map=19/50.88693/11.61630&layers=N
hast du es zu gut gemeint mit den Ampeln. Das https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2305800651 ist die Fußgängerampel, die zwei ergänzten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9254625507 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9254625508 sind, denke ich,  zuviel. An den anderen Übergängen ebenso.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Velikodsky (2021-11-23 14:02:30+00:00): Добрий день! Ви додали велодоріжку (way 1005515467) уздовж Борщагівської. Добре, але там вже є велодоріжка, що позначена однією лінією з пішохідною доріжкою (way 337007494, segregated=yes). Тут можна або видалити нову велодоріжку (тобто повернути, як було), або видалити вело-теги зі старої доріжки (залишити її як тротуар: 
highway=footway, surface=paving_stones). Якщо Ви оберете другий шлях, то перенесіть, будь ласка, surface=asphalt на нову велодоріжку. Окрім цього варто позначити точку перетину вело- та пішоходної доріжки як highway=crossing, crossing=zebra, якщо там є зебра. Ну і ще можна з'єднати нову велодоріжку з тими поворотами, на які велосипедист може звертати: інакше навігатор там поворот не дозволить.
Kozinsky (2021-11-24 08:46:46+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за замечания. Удалил свою велодорожку, но пешеходный переход в том месте где тротуар и велодорожка переплетаются я считаю нужно оставить, хотя в таком виде он выглядит странно.
Velikodsky (2021-11-24 10:33:28+00:00): Думаю, перехід потрібен. Це не заборонено. Проте ця позначка буде попереджувати учасників руху.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
ququruzka (2022-09-24 14:27:27+00:00): Вітаю !
В звязку з військовими діями в Україні забороняються масові правки без узгодження їх зі українською спільнотою!
Раджу звернути на це увагу і відтермінувати ваші правки, які і раніше також були не високої якості. 
Наступні масові правки на теренах України можна бути вважати за вандалізм і відреверчені без зауваження і обговорення !

Дякую за увагу !
Anna_rocketdata (2022-09-27 12:44:33+00:00): Добры дзень! Дзякуй за ваша паведамленне.
kate_rocketdata (2022-09-27 12:46:43+00:00): Прывітанне! Добра, дзякуй за ваша паведамленне.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-01 13:20:31+00:00): Hello kate_rocketdata,
There is no mention of Ukraine at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rocketdata_import or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Rocketdata.io .  Was this edit made in error?
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
kate_rocketdata (2022-10-03 09:59:30+00:00): Good afternoon, Andy! 

Ukraine is mentioned here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Rocketdata.io 
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Rocketdata.io , https://i.imgur.com/n3cIclz.png

Previously, we posted imports for verification on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php , which we are talking about here https://i.imgur.com/Yav6gbT.png 

After the publication of the request not to update data on the territory of Ukraine, we did not upload data for the country.

Best Regards,
Kate
ivanbranco (2021-11-23 15:17:29+00:00): Perché hai cancellato l'alt_name dalla Piazza Undici Settembre? Se non hai nulla in contrario ripristino i tag cancellati
user_10901495 (2021-11-24 08:17:06+00:00): D'accordo
user_10901495 (2021-11-24 08:18:06+00:00): Se per "tag cancellati" intendi quello che hai evidenziato ovviamente.
alix_geovelo (2021-11-26 10:34:48+00:00): Ajout donnée Avignon -
Source Agglo Avignon
wireguy (2021-11-25 01:25:11+00:00): this change broke the relations for yukon and oklahoma city.   corrected.  please verify with your linters. thx.
Lialiuika (2021-11-25 11:03:23+00:00): Thank you very much for not only noticing this error, but also fixing this map-breakage. We will be more attentive to such edits. Thank you for your help, with best wishes, Lyolya.
Larmax (2021-11-23 18:25:52+00:00): Moi, rakennusten ääriviivojen pitäisi mennä rakennuksen "pohjan" muikaisesti eikä katon. Siis näin: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Buildingmapping-r0s3.png
Carto_Graph (2021-11-25 19:09:14+00:00): А что не так с импортом? Источник же разрешенный.
Ars-UA (2021-11-25 19:40:11+00:00): Импорты не приветствуются. Что я знаю, где находится, оставляю. Остальное идёт лесом. Тем более, ломбарды каждую неделю переезжают - кто потом за этим следить будет.
ivanbranco (2021-11-23 15:10:48+00:00): Ciao AlbyKitGally,

ti rinnovo l'invito a scrivere commenti ai changeset sensati: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114131482
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:19:12+00:00): Hi,
zunäcsht einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Der "name"-Tag ist eher für Eigennamen gedacht als für Funktionsbeschreibungen. Dafür sollte man andere Tags verwenden. Wenn es nichts passendes gibt, kann man wie hier auch den "description"-Tag verwenden. Ich hab daher den naemn wieder entfernt.

Mehr Infos zu dem Tag findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Gruß
winkeldings
Jehe (2021-11-23 18:42:05+00:00): Name "Schaukelbank-Aussichtspunkt" ist in der Bevölkerung bekannt. Bitte NICHT löschen ! Wir (ILS Freiburg-Breisgau-Hoschwarzwald) nutzen die OSM für die Notfallrettung. Hier war gestern ein Einsatz, deshalb die Namensbezeichnung. Danke ! Gruß ILS Freiburg
wkdgs (2021-11-23 19:00:45+00:00): Ok. Schreibt am Besten das in kurz nochmal als "note"-Tag dazu. Dann wissen andere Mapper Bescheid.
Jehe (2021-11-23 19:03:39+00:00): ok. Danke für den Hinweis !
schönen Abend noch
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-04 01:42:59+00:00): Relation: Wenmiao Subdistrict (9882827) is broken, are you able to fix it?
Falsernet (2021-11-23 13:06:07+00:00): Can you stop deleting cycleways. You've not restored anything that wasn't there beforehand
sandroz (2021-11-23 11:24:30+00:00): Навіщо ви вадаляєте обєкти мапи?
marczoutendijk (2021-11-23 15:03:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114119624, 114119652, 114119676, 114119724, 114119826, 114119868, 114119910, 114119989, 114120025, 114120077, 114120107, 114120150, 114120191, 114120230, 114120269, 114120311, 114120351, 114120397, 114120431, 114120487, 114120530.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
vulasala (2021-11-24 08:36:29+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005535489 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114133458
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
ma-rt-in (2021-11-25 05:41:43+00:00): Moin,
Ich vermute mal das die Straße zwei Fahrtrichtungen hat und somit lanes=2 oder etwa nicht?
olafk (2021-11-25 08:28:27+00:00): Korrekt, das habe ich übersehen. Ist nachgetragen - Danke
ma-rt-in (2021-11-25 08:31:06+00:00): Schau am besten bei den anderen Änderungen ebenfalls nach.
olafk (2021-11-25 18:04:32+00:00): Die Pinneberger Chaussee ist auf der ganzen Länge der vergangenen Bauarbeiten korrigiert. Radweg-Belag (Asphalt) auf dem langen Teilstück hab ich gerade nachgetragen. Hab ich noch was vergessen/übersehen?
ma-rt-in (2021-11-25 18:34:27+00:00): sollte nun passen
vulasala (2021-11-24 08:33:09+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005536525 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114133666
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
RicoElectrico (2021-12-22 17:22:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2979509
Antoni_W (2021-12-29 11:19:41+00:00): Dzięki za zgłoszenie. Uwaga rozwiązana.
vulasala (2021-11-24 08:30:00+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005537953 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114133828
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:56:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
vulasala (2021-11-24 08:25:04+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005538955 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114134078
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
ftcat (2021-11-23 14:37:29+00:00): Another incorrect tagging of a trunk road
eggie (2021-11-23 11:02:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Alle begin is moeilijk ..

Zo te zien heb je er een woonerf van gemaakt. Staat hier dan een bord woonerf?
De wettelijke 'maxspeed' op een woonerf is 15 en geen 30.
Er staat nog steeds de specificatie construction=residential Die regel moet weg. 
Is het dan heen residential? 

Het routeeert waarschijnlijk niet meer goed voor fietsers. Die zijn bijna altijd uitgezonderd voor oneway=yes 
Is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-23 11:07:43+00:00): motor_vehicle / bicycle , foot=yes is allemaal default op wegen en hoef je niet bij te taggen.
Delvenaer (2021-11-23 11:33:32+00:00): Hi Sorry my dutch is not good so i will respond in English. 

There is sign end of zone 30 at the exit of the street. but at the entrance you have residential area sign. Hence my speed limit 30. It is possible that zone 30 sign was not taken off from the time it was a two way street as in general signs on this road are messy. 

Its one way red paved street for pedestrians, cyclist and motor vehicle on one shared space. There is no distinctive sidewalk or bike lane but also not for cars. Solemn function of this road is to reach residential buildings on the side of it. 

Bicycles are excluded from one way. 


Best, 
Delvenaer
eggie (2021-11-23 11:59:06+00:00): Hi...  So it's definitely not a an living_street.

A highway=residential is a better tag.
You may add 
oneway:bicycle=no anyway.. 

I'm curious what sign is placed at the street entrance.. 

We also know the tag 'voetgangersgebied' ? (pedestrian area) 

highway=pedestrian   with additional tags bicycle=yes motor_vehicle=yes 

Is that the case?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

Greetz,
eggie
Delvenaer (2021-11-23 12:14:53+00:00): Just went out of my home (i live here) to check all signs again. 
Limit is 30 (zone 30 sign), bicycles are uitgezonderd and living street category suits better looking at how it look like in real life. Its definitelly not like residential road on example.
eggie (2021-11-23 12:45:57+00:00): Oke.. highway=pedestrian.. 😀

Up to you!
Eggie
eggie (2021-11-23 13:22:53+00:00): living_street is an official tag with sign NL:G5  maxspeed 15.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_G5.svg

......
Roads in the Netherlands 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging

Greetz,
eggie
Delvenaer (2021-11-23 13:29:23+00:00): Ok now i get it. Switched to residential then :D  

Thanks for helping me out with this confusion
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
vulasala (2021-11-24 08:16:18+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005541601 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114134505
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:15:31+00:00): Hi,

zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Wenn du Straßenlampen hinzufügst, kannst du bei den durchgehend beleuchteten Straßen den Tag "lit=yes" hinzufügen? Dann ist das auch direkt erledigt.

Gruß
winkeldings
kawino85 (2021-11-23 16:16:26+00:00): Konnichiwa Noro Hibu,

I would not add the Wikidata ID to each and every way of a river, but just to the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2775973 !
Noro Hibu (2021-11-23 16:23:26+00:00): Hello. I didn’t add it, I just corrected the geometry of the river. Didn't change tags.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-11-24 16:46:51+00:00): Hallo Ov3rkill67,

hast du dich mit den Tags "tracktype" und "mtb:scale" vertraut gemacht?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale

Dem Bild auf Komoot zufolge handelt es sich nämlich sehr wohl um einen grade4-Weg. Ein grade1-Weg würde eine versiegelte Oberfläche wie z.B. Asphalt oder Beton bedeuten.

Das S1 bzw. S4 bezieht sich vermutlich eher auf mtb:scale anstatt tracktype.

DD1GJ hat den Tracktype bereits wieder auf grade4 zurückgesetzt.

Du brauchst hier also nicht weiter unternehmen. Aber bitte vor weiteren Änderungen über die genaue Bedeutung der Tags informieren!

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Jordi MF (2021-11-25 18:11:13+00:00): Hola Mikel,
He visto que sigues mapeando las zonas de tránsito para peatones como si fuesen natural=bare_rock o natural=stone. Por favor, fíjate que esas etiquetas tienen otros usos muy distintos según la wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=bare_rock o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=rock o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=stone

Para indicar el área de tránsito, debes añadir area:highway=footway/pedestrian según el highway principal + surface=*. Si estás mapeando así para que visualmente aparezca en el mapa de la web, estarías mapenado "para el render", lo que está catalogado como error (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) y deberemos revertir los changesets.

Sería una lástima porque mucha información que introduces es valiosa, pero a la vez contiene muchos errores.
Te invito a que entres en el grupo de Telegram valenciano y de España de OSM para resolver cualquier duda ;)

Saludos,
Jordi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
MarcoR (2021-11-30 17:36:29+00:00): Ciao! Di cosa si occupa "Studio Agosti"? Senza altre etichette il nome da solo non indica il tipo di oggetto.

A presto,
Marco.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:11:17+00:00): Hi, 

zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Der "name"-Tag ist eher für Eigennamen gedacht und nicht zur Beschreibung der Funktion eines Objekts. Dass es sich um eine Notfallspur handelt, wird bereits durch den Tag "highway=escape" beschrieben. Ich entferne daher den Namen wieder.

Mehr Infos zum "name"-Tag findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Gruß
winnkeldings

Mehr Infos zu dem