piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-09-09 14:14:39+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Succes met het mappen voor HOT.
Tom Layo (2019-04-24 10:07:18+00:00): There does not seem to be any village here.
mbethke (2019-04-24 14:33:54+00:00): It does look rather green on aerial imagery ;) 
Considering the latter is less than a year and a half old here (DigitalGlobe Premium that is) I suppose that village node was supposed to go somewhere else. Mandy?
eggie (2017-09-09 06:32:56+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Stalfur (2020-01-23 17:59:30+00:00): Þetta er röng nálgun - það er kortabirting sem ákveður hvort að kort sé "cluttered" eða ekki. Maður eyðir ekki gögnum af því að þau eru "fyrir manni".
Tómas Ingi (2020-01-23 18:03:29+00:00): Hæ,

Við ræddum þetta fyrir tveim árum, þetta var afgreitt þá.
user_5359 (2017-09-09 08:55:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think the restaurant exists in the middle of a street.
user_5359 (2017-10-07 14:02:53+00:00): Hello! You import building with height=17.3400000000 . Do you really have the accuracy, or does it also the value 17.34 ?
rickmastfan67 (2017-09-13 07:13:49+00:00): Heads up, but I-87 will only go as far as the US-64 Business / NC-97 interchange (New Bern Aveune).

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2017/09/goodbye-interstate-495-hello-interstate.html
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/traffic/article171521622.html
rickmastfan67 (2017-09-13 07:14:20+00:00): The FHWA hasn't approved it any farther than that yet.
Your Village Maps (2017-09-15 02:39:43+00:00): I had just heard about the change from I-495 to I-87 and wanted to make sure OSM showed the change. Mapper sprjus4 beat me to it by one day. However, there were a few segments that they missed, so I updated those to I-87 also and added oldref = I 495 to all segments, which they did not do. I did read about where it ended but did not change any of the segments ref's that sprjus4 had edited, thinking maybe they knew better (it wouldn't surprise me either way). Probably best to message this mapper and find out if they are local and can confirm one way or the other. I will do that.
Your Village Maps (2017-09-15 02:49:54+00:00): Follow-up to my comment just posted a few minutes ago above:

I have also now discovered that another mapper, Silvertronica, has edited this motorway 4 days ago, extending the stretch labeled with ref = I 87 from Buffalo Creek (where sprjus4 had it end) to Little River, a few miles further NE of there. So maybe this is correct? I will message both of them now.
shirasayu (2017-09-12 09:33:07+00:00): こんにちは。
今井町と八木町ですが、町全体を公園に設定する理由がわかりません。
地名や観光地としてタグ付けする方が適切だと思います。
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-10 18:48:23+00:00): Hello popilen. With this changeset you have introduced a new key `Nota`, e.g. at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522730979. Should it better be a note, fixme or description?
popilen (2017-09-10 23:27:49+00:00): Grazie Harald per il commento.
Sostituirò la key "Nota" con la key "description"
frosm (2017-09-09 10:18:17+00:00): bonjour,
merci pour votre contribution
si vous êtes motivé par une description si précise du batiment, je vous conseille la lecture la page du wiki parlant des batiments 3D
lun des tag le plus utile est building:part qui permet de décrire par exemple la véranda comme faisant partir du batiment.
car le tag description sert uniquement aux humains, il n’apparaît pas sur le rendu de la carte
Plumedelapin (2017-09-09 10:41:39+00:00): Merci beaucoup mais non, je me faisais simplement la main avec les outils sur un contexte que je connais... pour avoir une maitrise minimum. Je voulais/je veux vous aider a cartographier Saint Martin et Saint Barthelemy après Irla qui me sont proches ou autres, mais je n'y arrive pas : les photos obtenues sont toutes avant Irma.
Plumedelapin (2017-09-09 10:44:58+00:00): ...ou pas de photos du tout pour la Floride par exemple. Je n'arrive pas à obtenir les photos satellite pour cartographier.
frosm (2017-09-09 10:50:03+00:00): Oui c'est une très bonne idée de se faire la main sur un environnement que l'on connait.
Pour le batiment, il n'est pas nécessaire de faire une relation pour un simple batiment
les infos que mis sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7556436 peuvent être mise directement sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522755704
n'hésitez pas à rajouter le numéro et la rue sur le batiment.
la ville est par contre déjà souvent définie par une zone qui emble les batiments, cela se vérifie avec "clic droit, afficher l'adresse".
Pour HOT, Voici le seul message francophone que j'ai.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2017-September/085895.html
Plumedelapin (2017-09-09 12:08:33+00:00): merci de votre retour. Je viens de passer des heures à essayer de trouver pourquoi je n'y arrive pas...pas de photos qui s'affichent donc pas de travail possible, nulle part. Je tombe sur des kilomètres de docs techniques, très complexes et très denses. Je ne trouve pas de lien avec qq qui pourrait m'aider...bon, à regret (je croyais que ce serait beaucoup beaucoup plus simple de contribuer), je vais laisser tomber. Encore merci de votre présence.
santamariense (2017-09-09 11:00:14+00:00): adrianojbr,

Foi decisão da comunidade gaúcha deixar o nome apenas no official_name.
Chegamos a este consenso pois tais nomes seriam reconhecidos em lei, mas desconhecido "in loco".

santamariense
adrianojbr (2017-09-09 13:27:48+00:00): bom dia, santamariense. fazendo referência ao que foi discutido na lista (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-February/011933.html), entendo que o correto é colocar o nome oficial em name. ainda mais nesses casos, onde há nome alternativo sem nome principal. quanto à decisão da comunidade gaúcha, cabe algumas considerações: 1. há uma separação entre as regras dentro do brasil? qual o nível de divisão: região, estado, cidade? qual o limite do que pode ser diferente? é interessante para o projeto osm essa divisão? mesmo pensando que a negativa é a resposta para a maior parte dessas questões, não achei nada documentado sobre essa decisão em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rio_Grande_do_Sul e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/RS/Rodovias_Estaduais. há registro em outro lugar? abraço.
santamariense (2017-09-09 14:32:19+00:00): Discutimos em algum momento em https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@osmrs . Talvez pesquisando por "official_name" no grupo s'encontre algo a respeito.

Por outro lado entraria-se naquele caso em que o nome de fato utilizado pela população seria tipo "Rodovia ERS-000", o que também é contra as regras da comunidade que entendeu por bem deixar apenas em ref com o name vazio.

Ponderações:
1. É um warning e não um error;
2. Não lembro se fui a favor ou contra a ideia.  Mas de qualquer maneira foi o decidido pela comunidade RS em dado momento.
adrianojbr (2017-09-09 15:14:10+00:00): para nome de fato, usa-se a tag loc_name. a questão sobre o nome com "Rodovia + código" é que não é um nome popular, é apenas uma forma de chamar algo que já está presente no ref (etiqueta adequada para código de rodovia). aqui um exemplo de rodovia, com name, ref e loc_name: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90094616. mas tudo bem, esse não é o espaço adequado para alterar algo que foi decidido pela comunidade gaúcha. sugiro que levem, ao menos, à consideração da talk-br. o telegram não é um meio oficial para decisão. além de que fica inviável acompanhar todos os canais por esse brasil a fora. a não ser que cada grupo aja de forma separada... abraço.
santamariense (2017-09-09 16:25:09+00:00): Falta tempo e pessoal para tudo. Se a gente partisse para documentar cada mínima coisa decidida estaríamos até agora documentando e discutindo, porém nada sendo mapeado de fato.
Resumindo, também não tenho intenção aqui de discutir se é melhor isso ou aquilo. Apenas que não foi algo "ao acaso".
Abraço.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:06:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Philostrato (2017-09-09 20:17:23+00:00): How do you recognize them?  And what are they doing there?
Philostrato (2017-09-09 20:22:00+00:00): (I mean, can they be recognized from satellite photos without ground truth.)
b-jazz (2020-08-20 04:04:46+00:00): Hello Oregon. I'm trying to understand the reason that the long ways were split up into small road segments when you were adding stop signs. (https://www.osm.org/way/522775123 for example)

There shouldn't be any need to break them up as far as I'm aware, but maybe you know some reason that I haven't considered yet. I'd like to get them all combined back into a single way (when appropriate) but don't want to break anything you've worked on. 

Is there some need for a single road to be made up of dozens of small segments?

Thanks.
Oregon On Demand (2020-09-13 18:08:01+00:00): Hey b-jazz, hope you're doing well. The changeset you refer to occurred three years ago and did not involve breaking up the way that I can see (https://osmcha.org/changesets/51869119/). If you know of a specific case where I did this please let me know. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/51869119
philam48 (2017-09-09 10:02:35+00:00): Thank you!
DavidKewley (2017-09-09 05:45:27+00:00): A highway's tags were removed and replaced with those of a business. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51869757.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:07:10+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Osm1980 (2017-10-23 19:36:54+00:00): noghat shakhsi ra hich vaght be naghshe ezafe nakonid chon dar maraze did milyonha kabari ke az in nahshe esfadeh mikonan gharar migireh
Basstoelpel (2017-09-09 18:57:20+00:00): Hallo segg,

es gibt noch einen Buchstaben zu korrigieren: addr:country muß DE sein, nicht GE.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
segg (2017-09-09 22:36:54+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! (Da hatte ich es wohl mit dem Englischen verwechselt)
segg (2017-09-10 12:56:00+00:00): Das habe ich bei allen Häusern gemacht.
Gibt es eigentlich eine elegantere Methode - Massentagging - statt alle zu markieren und umzubezeichnen?
Basstoelpel (2017-09-13 11:47:24+00:00): In JOSM kannst Du mehrere auswählen, indem Du die shift-Taste hältst. Noch besser:ein Filter child addr anlegen, der dafür sorgt, daß die nodes der Gebäude versteckt werden, dazu einen anderen Filter mit z.B. "addr:city"=DE, um nur Objekte   mit dem Problem zu selektieren. Dann kannst Du alle auf einmal selektieren.
muzirian (2020-03-17 11:24:54+00:00): Hi, different facilities in the hospital shouldn't be tagged as hospital, please find suitable tags and update
eggie (2017-09-09 08:22:51+00:00): Herman... probeer svp aan te geven wat je precies gedaan hebt. Voetpaden is wat vaag.
literan (2017-09-09 11:45:59+00:00): Здравствуйте! корректный тег для подъездов - entrance=staircase
hauler (2017-09-10 07:32:37+00:00): Спасибо, поправил
Pontiac_CZ (2020-05-18 22:56:52+00:00): Ahoj, tahle změna service na footway proč? Chodím tudy aspoň jednou týdně a během posledních let nedošlo k žádnému zúžení. Tak široká je ta komunikace právě proto, aby se k zadním bránám těch zahrad mohlo i s autem...
zstadler (2017-09-26 16:28:29+00:00): Hi,
.
Thanks for your first contribution to Open Street Map!
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522799649 but it has no meaningful  tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
zstadler (2021-07-11 20:59:40+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53529247
Alexey Vazhnov (2017-09-10 10:58:51+00:00): «Красивое дерево» — это наверно не туристическая достопримечательность. Если ни от кого не будет подтверждений, удаляю.
Alexander-II (2017-09-10 12:10:20+00:00): Как минимум, стоит добавить тег natural=tree и переместить "Красивое дерево" из name=* в description=* Но если это совершенно рядовое дерево и больше никто не считает его примечательным, то tourism=attraction стоит убрать.
Alexey Vazhnov (2017-09-12 15:41:52+00:00): Alexander-II, так и сделал, спасибо!
mueschel (2017-09-22 11:28:42+00:00): Hi,
was heißt denn "phonezx"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088455542
Deus Figendi (2017-10-15 16:45:45+00:00): Das ist eine gute Frage, vielleicht habe ich mich da irgendwie vertippt oder mein Telefon. Wenn es mir nicht einfällt kann ich das auch löschen.
freebeer (2017-10-16 12:15:57+00:00): Und warum name=Sitzbank ?
Das kennt man schon von amenity=bench ...
Oder heisst es dreimal offiziell Sitzbank?
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Ambush (2017-09-09 18:16:38+00:00): Привет!
Спасибо за правку. 
Если это отдельный частный дом, лучше ставить house=detached.
Успехов!
evod (2017-10-02 20:57:57+00:00): Hallo Johannes, bitte oneway:bicycle=no nicht entfernen sondern am besten explizit taggen wenn eine Einbahn geöffnet ist. (In der Sternwartestraße: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5743168 hast du es - vermutlich eh versehentlich - entfernt)

Der Tag macht es für Anwendungen, die OSM zum Routen verwenden leichter geöffnete Einbahnen für Radfaher festzustellen - nicht alle Anwendungen werten cycleway[:left/:right]=opposite_* aus.
jogemu (2017-10-04 06:56:08+00:00): Hallo evod,
ich habe die Tags leider nicht versehentlich und auch nicht nur dort entfernt. Ich habe gedacht, dass der Tag oneway:bicycle=no nur redundanz verursacht und keinen Nutzen hat. Ich werde mich, wenn ich einmal mehr Zeit habe darum kümmern, dass ich den Tag überall hinzufüge. Bitte um Gedult.
Johannes
evod (2017-10-12 17:04:19+00:00): Hallo Johannes, oje, das ist nicht günstig. Laut Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway) ist oneway:*=no für Ausnahmen der Einbahn nämlich sogar die neue Variante zu Taggen und cycleway=opposite eher legacy.
LG, Markus
jogemu (2017-10-21 13:16:29+00:00): Hallo evod, ich habe die Tags nun geändert.
evod (2017-10-24 17:12:24+00:00): Servus, super, danke!
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Mike Baggaley (2017-09-11 13:55:57+00:00): Hi Will, I see you have changed tunnel=yes to tunnel=underpass. I can find no mention of tunnel=underpass as an approved value in the wiki, and the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Subway indicates that tunnel=yes is the correct value. Can you please explain why you think tunnel=underpass should be used?

Regards,
Mike
will_p (2017-09-11 15:05:03+00:00): I reverted your change because it stripped out information. Just because a tag isn't documented on the wiki, does not mean its use is not allowed, and it certainly does not permit you to randomly swoop down and remove it. OSM mappers thankfully aren't limited to a list of 'approved' tags.

Adding more specific values to the bridge=* and tunnel=* tags seems very much in line with acceptable OSM tagging practice to me. Indeed the wiki already documents several more specific values for these tags. Why shouldn't mappers indicate the specific type of tunnel if they wish? 

I also notice you have been replacing specific bridge=* tags with bridge=yes. I'm really not sure why you think it is acceptable to strip out information in this way. None of the removed bridge values were added by me, but again they looked entirely acceptable.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-09-09 09:11:26+00:00): A cóż to za ciekawy pomysł, by nazwę dodawać rysując drugie rondo wewnątrz istniejącego?