piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-11-13 15:24:09+00:00): Dat Swift loop bos (officiële naam??) heb ik van de bebouwing gehaald en losgemaakt van objecten.
Wellicht iets meer nauwkeurigheid... 
Dit was je edit 
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-11-13 15:24:44+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53741679
majid1359 (2017-11-13 14:17:36+00:00): بانک ملت اضافه شود
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-11-13 14:22:26+00:00): شیرینی سراها تصحیح شد اضافه گردد
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Adrien G (2017-11-21 09:46:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de vérifier vos données : il n'y a pas de « car_wash » à l'école centrale, mais bien un banc.
SomeoneElse (2017-11-13 18:46:50+00:00): Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :)
SomeoneElse (2017-11-13 18:47:29+00:00): Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :)
Ferrocarriles de México (2024-08-19 19:12:22+00:00): All the tags you changed are set and have no basis. Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155477193
Adrien G (2017-11-21 09:41:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de vérifier vos données : Par exemple le parking vélo est taggé en double, et mal : il n'est pas ouvert 24/7, puisque l'école est fermé la nuit, et il n'y a pas de vendeur de vélo (shop).
Je corrige donc ce point.
Zverik (2017-11-14 11:21:48+00:00): Hi Tom,

Why did you change the line type? Wikipedia says it is a light rail line: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lausanne_Metro#Line_M1

Ilya
Tom317 (2017-11-14 11:44:05+00:00): Hi Ilya, 
I changed it, because it goes partially underground and basically it is a subway. But I agree, that light rail is better for this specific metro line.

Best,
Tom
eggie (2017-11-13 15:36:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM


Zoek svp de al bestaande BAG adresnodes op om daarop bij te taggen.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
frosm (2021-03-30 23:49:42+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5226547001
qu'est-ce que cela représente ?
Cordialement,
Marc
eggie (2017-11-13 15:41:12+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
chnav (2017-11-29 08:17:51+00:00): Это не landuse=retail. Вернул обратно residential. Пожалуйста не исправляйте карту под рендер (разукрашивание)
rab (2017-11-13 16:28:33+00:00): review_requested=yes
In order to make your edits appear on the Map please change:
Chinyanánya Business Centre:
Landuse=retail instead of area=yes
Chinyanánya Primary School:
amenity=school instead of area=yes
Tag the Soccerfield with leisure=pitch + sports=soccer.
Often it is easier to change the geometry of existing objects, instead of redrawing them.
Please keep mapping.
eggie (2017-11-13 15:42:32+00:00): Deze staat wel keurig op de adresnode
majid1359 (2017-11-13 14:51:14+00:00): لطفا آخرین تغییرات امروز سافتک در سایت osm انتقال یابد ور اپدیت بعدی نقشه ایران مسیریاب های مجیک ارث و مپس .می و اسمند بیاد با تشکر
wambacher (2017-11-14 11:47:15+00:00): Hi, you are "killing" a lot of boundaries in Afghanistan!!!!

please storp this right now. let us discuss what you are doing wrong.

walter/germany
30303020 (2017-11-19 15:17:13+00:00): Kannst du vllt. noch die Relationen der Linie 96 (nach Norden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1585203 und nach Süden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/178663) anpassen. Danke!
Steve8x8 (2017-11-20 11:15:39+00:00): Nach der Fahrplanumstellung gern - momentan fährt dort nur ein Bus. (Ist es schon sicher, dass die Liniennummern sich nicht ändern werden?)
30303020 (2017-11-20 16:25:23+00:00): Warum sollten sich die Liniennummern ändern? Ich sehe keinen Grund dafür.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jc86035 (2017-11-14 06:41:32+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Note that paths like this one – https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540207157 – should be marked as bridges with a layer tag so they appear correctly. (Split the way so that only the part which is a bridge is tagged as a bridge.)
jc86035 (2017-11-14 07:10:16+00:00): *Welcome back, sorry.
Alecs01 (2017-11-13 20:00:56+00:00): Ciao, hai cancellato quasi tutti i binari "di servizio" della stazione di Brescia http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53743179 sono stati rimossi tutti? dalle immagini di Bing sembrerebbe di sì, ma sono rimasti comunque alcuni nodi "orfani" che non hanno senso senza i binari che arrivano lì, come questo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1102191490 Ricordati per favore di commentare i changeset con qualcosa di sensato (es. cancellati binari rimossi) è una forma di cortesia verso gli altri mappatori http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_6110846 (2018-04-16 05:10:39+00:00): Good Day I returned the languages you deleted Do not do this anymore - it's vandalism and damage to the card
Branko Kokanovic (2018-04-16 06:44:42+00:00): Hi, I was under impression I was adding name:sr to some cities. If I deleted some languages, please point me to which one, since I cannot find that from this changeset, so I can figure out how I made mistake. In any way, any deletion of any language was accidental and I am sorry!
user_6110846 (2018-04-16 06:50:00+00:00): sorry I was abusing alcohol yesterday. Some kind of hallucinationsYou do not have any complaints
bgirardot (2017-12-09 16:04:59+00:00): Hi Mr@x Thank you very much for adding to OpenStreetMap.

I noticed you added a church, which is really helpful information to add. Usually the "name" field is used for the actual, full name of the church and there are some other tags for type or denomination of the place_of_worship.

If you could add the actual name and any of the other tags about what type of church it is that would really help. Even if you just put them in as a comment on this changeset, I can add them for you. Thanks again for mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tordans (2019-02-02 07:45:38+00:00): @Sidapo unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269621808/history hast du einen Tag "node= 3269621808" eingefügt. Das wird im neuen KeepRight QA Tool von iD als eventueller Fehler angezeigt. Ich kenne den Tag so auch nicht. Hat er einen zweck oder kann ich ihn löschen? VG
Sidapo (2019-02-02 10:30:21+00:00): Ja, das war wohl ein Fehler. Hab den Tag gelöscht, danke für den Hinweis!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dzikos (2017-11-14 09:48:42+00:00): Pamiętaj, żeby przy takich zmianach pozostawić starą nazwę ulicy jako old_name oraz żeby pozmieniać adresy budynków przy tej ulicy.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
TZorn (2020-02-06 11:01:48+00:00): Hallo Robert, ist diese Planung noch so gültig? Die Bebauung mit Gebäuden scheint anders zu verlaufen.
stadt-koeln-tillmann (2020-02-06 12:04:11+00:00): Hallo Tobias,

das habe ich kurz geprüft. Der Bebauungsplan ist geändert worden, die Umsetzung jetzt entspricht dem aber auch nicht. Die Ernst-Abbe-Straße ist ein bereits amtlich vergebener Straßenname. Ob der nun auf das gebaute Straßenteilstück angewandt wird, kann ich den Unterlagen auch noch nicht entnehmen: „Duch B-Plan-Änderung wird die Straße nicht wie beschlossen gebaut. Eine Anpassung des Benennungsbeschlusses wird durchgeführt.“ Die bisherige Planung kann also in der Form definitiv aus OSM gelöscht werden, es sei denn, Du möchtest vorläufig schon einmal die Straßennamen konservieren.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Im Auftrag 
Robert Tillmann

Stadt Köln - Die Oberbürgermeisterin
Amt für Liegenschaften, Vermessung und Kataster
Willy-Brandt-Platz 2 
50679 Köln 

Telefon: 0221/221-23947
Telefax: 0221/221-24959
E-Mail: robert.tillmann@stadt-koeln.de 
Internet: www.stadt-koeln.de
mavl (2018-12-25 20:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Albin Gasparetto (2017-11-21 11:01:00+00:00): C'est ouf, y'a du lagunage en bordure de mer ? 
Ça fonctionne leur système ? Y'a pas des soucis liée au sel ?
M!dgard (2018-01-08 12:09:19+00:00): Dag Pieter,

Je hebt een wall- en height-tag toegevoegd op https://osm.org/node/2411831868. Was dat per ongeluk in plaats van op https://osm.org/way/232872517 ?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-08 12:19:07+00:00): Dat is inderdaad een muurtje die dwars op het pad staat. Ook op het knooppunt staat een barrier=wall.

Maw: het zou ongeveer moeten kloppen wat er staat
M!dgard (2018-01-08 13:01:06+00:00): barrier=wall wordt normaal niet op nodes gebruikt. JOSM waarschuwt hiervoor met een "⚠️"-icoon op de node.

Ook wordt het herhalen van tags op een node die al op een parent-way staan afgeraden (ook als de tag op de node ook geldig is).
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-08 13:03:17+00:00): Ok, in dat geval... De informatie op de node is verwijderd.
PT-53 (2017-11-13 16:55:11+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz bei mehreren Gebäude den Umriß verändert. Warum ?
Die Gebäude wurde von mir anhand Maps4BW lagegenau und korrekt eingezeichnet!
Machst Du die Änderungen rückgängig oder muß ich das machen ?
kintetsu (2017-11-13 19:09:01+00:00): Ja, habe die Garage eingetragen. Zwischen jedem Wohnhaus ist eine Garage. alle haben die gleiche Breite, nur die zwischen 27 und 25 ist länger als die anderen. Kann man sich Maps4BW als Hintergrundbild in JOSM legen?
Gruß
PT-53 (2017-11-13 19:41:09+00:00): Maps4BW ist in JOSM - soweit man innerhalb BW arbeitet - standartmäßig im Menue Hintergrundbild auswählbar.
PT-53 (2017-11-14 08:58:51+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
ich habe diesen Änderungssatz komplett reverted und die fehlende Garage nachgetragen.
Grüße
kintetsu (2017-11-14 09:47:14+00:00): Hallo PT-53
Danke für den Hinweis mit Maps4BW. Ich sehe, dass da alle Gebäude super übereinstimmen. Eine Frage bleibt bei mir, gilt ganz allgemein, nicht nur für den zwischen uns diskutierten Bereich:: Wie ist sichergestellt, dass der Versatz von Maps4BW geringer ist als das Bing Luftbild bzw. das Digital Globe Premium und das Esri Luftbild? (Diese 3 haben einen identischen Versatz). Kannst du mir da Hinweise geben?
Herzliche Grüßße
PT-53 (2017-11-14 20:27:10+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Maps4BW hat keinen Versatz. Das isr eine amtliche Karte in der Gebäude i.d.R. lagegenau eiongezeichnet sind - siehe Wiki:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Natürlich enthält auch Maps4BW einzelne Fehler, vor allem aber sind die Daten - trotz update in 2016 - teilweise veraltet. Es können abgerissene Gebäude noch immer eingezeichnet sein und neue Gebäude noch fehlen. Deshalb mache ich auch immer noch einen Abgleich mit den Luftbildern, wobei Bing im Augenblick am aktuellsten ist. Bing verschiebe ich dazu anhand von Gebäuden, die mit Maps4BW übereinstimmen.
Grüße
kintetsu (2017-11-15 10:04:54+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Auskunft! War sehr hilfreich. Ich werde das in Zukunft genau so machen. 
Gruß
Jesús Gómez (2017-12-12 19:32:54+00:00): Hola cuancagen.
He añadido la etiqueta shelter_type=basic_hut al Refugio de Brañas de Espina. Creo que la mayoría de los refugios en Cantabria pueden incluir esta etiqueta pero si consideras que no es adecuado la puedes cambiar.
Un saludo. Jesús
eggie (2017-11-14 16:34:40+00:00): Hier dus ook construction = cycleway verwijderen. Ik doe het wel even.
Nakaner (2017-11-13 17:30:04+00:00): Hi Nickelodeous,

back in September Vivek asked on the Imports mailing list for a community review of the San Jose Sidwalk Import (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-September/005160.html). Other users responded there that if the import adds new sidwalks, they must be properly connected to the street network in this area. On 2017-10-20 I asked to add these connections (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005206.html). On Tuesday last week I repeated this request a SECOND time (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-November/005233.html). Andy Townsend from the OSMF Data Working Group repeated this request today (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-November/005246.html).

You still continue to upload even more erroneous data as though nothing had happened instead of fixing the data which has already been upload to OSM and waits to be fixed.

That's why I ask you again to pause your import until the erroneous data is not erroneous any more.

In addition, please use a dedicated account for any future changeset which is part of an import. The Import Guidelines require you to do so. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
dzikos (2017-11-13 18:04:38+00:00): Zgodnie z rozporządzeniem wojewody, nowa nazwa to "Lecha Kaczyńskiego", a nie "aleja Lecha Kaczyńskiego".
Patrz http://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/#/legalact/2017/10139/
naoliv (2017-11-28 01:33:33+00:00): Anderson, obrigado pelas contribuições.
Aparentemente você apagou algumas ruas que existiam para depois desenhá-las novamente.
Tente, sempre que possível, apenas corrigir o que está errado, sem apagar para depois fazer novamente.
Isso é importante para manter o histórico e o trabalho dos outros mapeadores.
Anderson Luciano (2017-11-28 10:16:38+00:00): Opa, eu que agradeço a dica. 
No caso dessa alteração eu mesmo tinha mapeado essas ruas, é um bairro novo e eu moro nele, como ainda não tinha nome eu deixei somente o caminho. Com a atualização dos nomes na prefeitura e a adição da layer DigitalGlobe Standard eu percebi que tinha algumas correções a serem feitas e como eu mesmo ja tinha criado então exclui e redesenhei.

Mas eu entendo perfeitamente a dica e vou me atentar principalmente quando se tratar de inclusões que não foram feitas por mim. Muito obrigado!
naoliv (2017-11-28 10:20:01+00:00): Se você tiver interesse em tirar dúvidas e se enturmar mais com os outros mapeadores, existem vários canais da comunidade listados em
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Os do Telegram (Comunidade e Suporte) costuam ser os mais movimentados.
Abraço!
maraf24 (2017-12-02 20:23:32+00:00): "poprawki różne" niosą w sobie tyle samo informacji, co brak komentarza.
Proszę się jednak starać napisać coś krótkiego, a adekwatnego :)
eggie (2017-11-14 16:31:11+00:00): Oke.., maar ik kan nu direct al zien dat de construction er nog op staat. Die haal ik er even af.
Construction=cycleway moet er dus af. Check je ook je overige fiets/wandelpaden als dit ook zo is?
Graag reactie dat je het begrepen hebt.
Dit was je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53744950
PT-53 (2017-11-13 17:02:27+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
der von Dir überarbeitete Fußwege hat lauf Mapbox-Luftbild keine so langen Treppenabscghnitte. Auch ist der Verlauf jetzt nicht mehr korrekt.
Ist Dir bekannt, daß Luftbilder immer einen gewissen Versatz aufweisen und dieser bei den neuen Bing-Luftbildern teilweise sehr groß ist.
Überarbeitest Du Deine Änderungen nochmal ?
Grüße