piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-12-05 22:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Bity (2018-10-16 06:26:03+00:00): This change affects a way by accident. it need to be reverted
mavl (2019-12-05 22:00:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 21:59:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 21:58:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:08:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:31:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Hjart (2018-10-16 08:22:32+00:00): Hvorfor slettede du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634383983/history ? Var den forkert?
atcomapper (2018-10-16 09:38:24+00:00): Såvidt jeg lige kunne gennemskue var det en duplet af https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634278388. Beklager hvis det var forkert.
Hjart (2018-10-16 09:43:08+00:00): Der er ikke noget shop=* tag på bygningen. Jeg lod navnet være ud fra en formodning om at det måske kunne have noget med bygningens anvendelse at gøre. Jeg kalder lige min polygon tilbage :-)
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-24 02:57:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63815728 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a gross oversimplification of a complex junction complicated by a toll plaza with split roadways.
oanac2_telenav (2018-10-24 06:14:07+00:00): Hello, can I ask you why did you revert my changeset? according to OSC from 2018-01-22 those toll booths aren't existing anymore and because of that also the geometry has been simplified...so, I do not understand.
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-25 01:51:31+00:00): OK, my fault, you're right.
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-25 01:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63851361 where the changeset comment is: I was wrong, oanac2 got it right, resurvey is needed at this toll plaza.
Robert46798 (2018-10-16 11:33:15+00:00): Hallo lionheart81,

danke für die Ergänzung.

Ich vermute mal den Namen kannst du auf "Ehemaliger Wasserturm" ändern, sofern das ein vor Ort nachvollziehbarer Name ist. Dann ohne Anführungsszeichen. Der Zusatz Aussichtspunkt gehört ja erfahrungsgemäß nicht zum Namen sondern ist eher eine Beschreibung des Objekts, die ja schon mit "tourism=viewpoint" gegeben ist.

Der Eintrag von "old_name" scheint mir eher zu einem der beiden Tags zu passen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:note

Um die Sache jetzt leider noch etwas komplizierter zu machen: Im Wiki wird folgendes vorgeschlagen: "Aufgrund der Regel One feature, one OSM element sollte der Punkt nicht gleichzeitig ein anderes Objekt sein wie zB natural=peak oder man_made=tower beinhalten. In diesen Fällen kann viewpoint=yes hinzugefügt werden." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=viewpoint?uselang=de)

Das heißt, dass ganze sollte entweder als "man_made=water_tower" (Wasserturm) oder "man_made=chimney" (Schornstein) + "historic=yes" (nicht mehr aktiv) + "viewpoint=yes" (Aussichtspunkt) eingetragen werden. Was von beidem zutrifft kann ich nicht sagen, da beides am Objekt getaggt ist.

es tut mir leid das es jetzt für so eine kleine Änderung so kompliziert geworden ist. falls noch Fragen vorhanden sind oder auftreten, kannst du dich gerne an mich wenden.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Hjart (2018-10-16 07:57:44+00:00): Bemærk at det af hensyn til historikken normalt er en bedre ide at justere eksisterende objekter end at slette og erstatte med nye. Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
Hjart (2018-10-16 07:58:48+00:00): Var mine ændringer på https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8815135/history iøvrigt forkerte?
hrmmhahmhm (2018-10-18 10:01:00+00:00): Jeg antager at Jesper Mortensen har tagget Nexus CPH som hotel ved en fejl.
Hjart (2018-10-18 10:26:24+00:00): Jesper svarer desværre aldrig på mine kommentarer og det er jo ikke fordi han ikke kan: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=188433&commented
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:31:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Geofalke (2019-03-06 18:53:18+00:00): bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634617004 fehlt das Tagging.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-10-29 10:04:05+00:00): Ladang buah guna orchard

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=orchard
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 04:38:30+00:00): yg ini dh betulkan ke??
AkuAnakTimur (2018-11-14 05:51:12+00:00): Okay dah rasanya... check yang lain jugak ye.
Supaplex (2018-10-16 08:27:34+00:00): 你把直潭社區巴士的停靠點變捷運站，但已經有捷運站的點了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63566803
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:38:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
abrensch (2018-10-21 16:41:07+00:00): Hallo Markus,

kannst Du mal diese Note anschauen wegen einer Strasse, die Du durchtrennt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1567422

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
mavl (2018-10-31 16:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64051544 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source Yandex Maps].
Joshua Gray (2018-10-25 22:34:59+00:00): Thanks Ed!
highflyer74 (2018-10-16 12:40:00+00:00): Moin Werner und willkommen bei OSM!

Denke bitte daran, dass OSM eine Live-Datenbank ist. Insofern sind Tests an dieser Stelle nicht ganz passend...

Der EDV Service hängt jetzt am landuse=residential. Ich passe es entsprechend an.

Falls Du Deine Firma eintragen möchtest, füge einfach einen Node (Punkt) auf dem Gebäude ein, wo sich die Firma befindet. Dann muss dieser Punkt mit entsprechenden Daten versehen werden. Schau Dir dazu mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit an.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
literan (2018-10-16 20:01:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634659739 мне кажется, это не здание, а сооружение. man_made=? (tunnel?)
sergeybe (2018-10-17 14:48:53+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
1. А вы точно уверены, что вершина называется Тез-Баир? Вы взяли название с Генштаба? Какие источники информации?
2. Уже есть в альтернативном названии такое имя;
Nmxosm (2018-10-16 13:40:25+00:00): Hallo Kotentopf,

willkommen bei OSM!
Würdest du bitte beschreibende Changesetkommentare verwenden? Das hilft anderen Beitragenden, Deine Änderungen besser nachzuvollziehen. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
pattamaa (2018-10-29 10:32:01+00:00): .
nevw (2018-10-17 00:41:08+00:00): Hi,
You have mapped a park across Bell - Banksia Link road - is this intended?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63568966
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
plamen (2018-10-23 19:48:19+00:00): https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/26697/how-do-you-tag-a-land-boundary-lot-boundary
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
Negreheb (2020-10-08 09:55:53+00:00): Hallo, gehört hier das gesamte Gebäude Kainz oder nur das Erdgeschoß oder so? Ich war noch nicht vor Ort, aber laut Webseite seid ihr auch umgezogen in die  Ernest-Thun-Straße 8 - wenn das korrekt ist, würde ich das Büro hier umsiedeln dorthin. Da ich aber auch dort dann davon ausgehe, dass der Kainzgruppe nicht das gesamte Gebäude gehört (bzw. als Büro verwendet wird), werde ich das als Punkt dorthinsetzen.

Einwände?
ghost_07 (2018-10-26 15:09:31+00:00): Это не парк. Парком отмечают только именованные зоны
roamingbuffalonian (2018-10-16 17:56:03+00:00): Testing Deriviste for the first time.
emergency99 (2018-10-16 12:01:01+00:00): Hello,
Do the stations have individual names? Cause only the Bus shorthand is more of a line ref. Also, has the bus got a fixed route?
geraldbaeck (2018-10-16 12:05:13+00:00): The Bus has a route. Can I draw that too? Sorry for being a newb. I don't know if the stations have names, but I will look it up when I am there next time.
emergency99 (2018-10-16 12:11:45+00:00): Well, In ID the relation will be difficult to create, but I could add that route using JOSM. (A more advanced editor). I will also map the stations according to the public_transport:version2 scheme as all the public transport in vienna. 
Thank you for the initial mapping of the stations and for looking the info up.
emergency99 (2018-10-16 12:13:20+00:00): Ok, I found the schedule online. Will try to map the line accordingly.
emergency99 (2018-10-16 12:47:07+00:00): Ok, mapped the busrelation now according to the schedule at http://www.wienkav.at/kav/wil/texte_anzeigen.asp?id=6724

Hope that is correct.
emergency99 (2018-10-16 12:55:56+00:00): ;) http://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=KAV&ref=WIL&operator=&correspondences=&width=700&height=295&font-size=&force-rows=1&max-cors-per-line=&max-cors-below=&style=
vojtechzaboril (2020-03-29 20:23:39+00:00): Dobrý den,
nemapujte prosím plánované silnice jako highway=construction, construction=primary. Pro mapování plánovaných silnic použijte ighway=proposed, proposed=primary (popřípadě secondary, ...)
S pozdravem VZ
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
felipeeugenio (2018-10-16 12:20:10+00:00): Hola José Pablo. Veo que  cambiaste una ciclovía por un tendido eléctrico, borraste algunos senderos y modificaste varias cosas que no sé si hacen mucho sentido. Están bien? o se trata de un error?Si tienes problemas con como mapear no tengo  problemas en ayudarte. Saludos
Basstoelpel (2018-12-05 20:42:54+00:00): Hi explorewiki,

Ticket Booth $1 Entry is not the name of any entity. It is only a desription, which is already given by the tags of this object.
explorewiki (2018-12-09 09:15:40+00:00): Thanks, I've removed this information from the name tag as per OSM naming guidelines.
This Is A Display Name Desu (2019-03-03 18:28:40+00:00): way 634704119 是通用航空机场？不是直升機場嗎？
Mollysuh (2019-03-04 13:27:03+00:00): 门牌写的是通用航空，但是目前仅限直升机使用
highflyer74 (2019-03-01 14:07:27+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please do not add things that are already mapped. I noticed you added several POI like East Horizon, Devon Residence etc that are already correctly mapped as nodes. If you have any questions, just let me know :-) Thank you!
jL4886 (2019-03-02 05:19:12+00:00): Hi Highflyer74, 

Ok I understand, I was trying to avoid repetitions. Apologies. Thanks
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-20 09:11:33+00:00): Чи впевнені Ви, що з.п. Дружба саме там розташована, а не тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3383696550 ?
abakus_uploader (2018-10-16 22:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2018-10-16 22:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ToniE (2018-10-16 11:44:03+00:00): Lieben Radiologen,

opening_hours hat so seine eigenen Gesetze, sprich eine eigene Syntax, und ist vor allem in English gehalten.

Ich werde die Einträge dementsprechend ändern von:

Mo – Do 09:00 – 19:00 Fr 08:30 – 14:00, Sa So geschlossen

nach

Mo-Th 09:00-19:00; Fr 08:30-14:00; Sa,Su,PH off

wobei "PH" public holyday heißt.

Viel Grüße
Toni
mavl (2018-10-16 16:09:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Этот пакет правок добавляет на карту дом "Холодильная улица, 15". Этот дом был удалён [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634730258/history], так как в этом месте на карте уже есть дом с таким же адресом [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88357406/history]. На карте достаточно одного дома.  
  
Также этот пакет правок добавляет улицу поверх уже существующей улицы (Волжская улица). Этот дубликат также удалён.
highflyer74 (2018-11-01 12:19:05+00:00): Moin LeBleu!

Bitte sei so nett, Dinge nicht zu verschieben, um die Sichtbarkeit auf einer bestimmten Karte zu erreichen. Wir mappen die Dinge dort, wo sie sind, nämlich innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses. Dies ist einer der Grundsätze von OSM (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice, dort speziell der Punkt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Beim_Attributieren_nicht_danach_richten.2C_was_der_Renderer_daraus_macht

Der Hintergrund ist, dass die Karte, die Du auf openstreetmap.org siehst, nur eines von hunderten Produkten ist, welches aus OSM-Daten besteht. Weitere Informationen findest Du im Artikel oben.

Deine Mit-Mapper danken Dir, wenn Du das nächste Mal daran denkst :-)

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
escallic (2018-10-16 22:43:29+00:00): What happened to Ramona Court?
Adamant1 (2018-10-20 04:15:54+00:00): Hhmmm good question. Things like that can happen when stuff is mapped wrong and convoluted. I accidently deleted a rather large lake a few weeks ago trying to clean up some horribly mapped farmland. It happens. Luckily it was fixed though. So, free to add Ramona Court back if you think it should be there.
Adamant1 (2018-12-28 08:14:50+00:00): I looked around and couldn't find this "Ramona Court" you speak of. Is it back yet or can you point me in the direction of where it should be?
escallic (2018-12-30 06:49:55+00:00): Sorry for late reply. 

Part of problem was recent urban developments and lack of imagery which btw Digital Globe now reflects though not yet hosted by OSM. So I didn't know exactly where to place the courts until now. I just updated it.

The other part of the problem was not knowing exactly how to tag a court, as a park, garden or grass, for example.

I changed most of the grass to garden because indeed it was unwalkable. You are right. I convolute or "split an area into two" when it is entirely subdivided by a concrete or asphalt path in an urban area. I'm reading the wiki as I go along, fixing the tags of nodes and their ways, relations. Please point me in the right direction if you see a mistake!

Most of the inspiration for convolution comes from the patches of green I see in UCSB campus maps where the areas serve to validate the ways by giving them edges. It seems like a good idea for such a large mapping project where mistakes can easily be made.
Adamant1 (2018-12-31 02:08:25+00:00): Thanks for the update. I agree the distinction between what is what when it comes green grassy woodsy things can be confusing. A while back I tried to get people on the wiki to better define what a park is, because I was sick of arguing with people why their front lawns aren't parks after they sent angry messages about it, but it never went anywhere. Oh well. 

The only things I sort of take issue with is the individual tree mapping inside of the
forest. Although its it might be technically correct, its a little redundant  because your already mapping the canopy area with landuse=forest. In my opinion, the tree tag is meant for mapping a "notable" tree in any given landscape, but not every single that comprises a tree canopy. In this case, either landuse=forest or the individual trees would be correct, but not both. And it really depends on the density of the tree cover. The fact that the place is also tagged as a meadow makes me think the individual trees is better then something like forest. As a natural landuse tag mapped on top of another one is kind of wrong tagging. Its either a meadow or a forest. Sometimes I'll go with natural=wood in that case. As it is an area cultivated by humans to be a meadow (eg the landuse) that contains a small wooded area inside of it (eg natural=wood). They didn't designate the area as a forest for landuse though. 

Also, in the UCSB Family Student Housing Parking, those trees are just to trees. Its not a landuse thing (aside form the overlapping landuse issue again). Again your using landuse to wrong map the area of the tree canopy, but that's not the purpose of it. That area going into the parking is just a few branches coming off the trunk that's on the grass, but its still just a parking lot. The same goes for the part mapped over the building (which is cut back seasonally anyway). So those should just be individual trees. 

I think that's enough for now, In general I'm a big fan of detail mapping if its done right. So don't take any of that as criticism of how your mapping in general. Its just specific instances that can use improving. I take it you live somewhere in that area? If so, do you happen to know what the place where this note is located is? If the official boundary of the community garden extends to where the buildings are on the right, it might be better to just map the whole area as a garden. Or at least the area on the right with the garden plots as a single garden with the name of the place if you know it (I.E. "whatever community garden") and then the area on the left as a meadow. Although going by the building and fence line id stipulate its probably all part of the same compound.
maraf24 (2018-10-20 19:18:22+00:00): Droga jest przejezdna?
Na zdjęciach wygląda na będącą wciąż w budowie.
cobayashi (2018-10-20 22:35:00+00:00): Jest calutka przejezdna, wymalowane pasy.
streinger (2018-10-16 12:58:45+00:00): что за магазин посреди дороги? его вообще объехать можно:) или вы  палатки придорожные пытались нарисовать? Просьба использовать спутниковые снимки, а не лепить точки где попало.