piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2021-12-10 19:37:15+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz bei zahlreichen Radwegen oneway=yes bzw. oneway:bicycle=yes entfernt. Mit diesem Tag wird gekennzeichnet, dass ein Radweg von Radfahrenden nur in eine Richtung befahren werden darf. Gemäß § 2 Abs. 1 StVO gilt das Rechtsfahrgebot. Linksseitige Radwege dürfen von Radfahrenden daher nur benutzt werden, wenn sie  explizit durch Zeichen 237 (Radweg), 240 (gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg), 241 (getrennter Geh- und Radweg) oder 1022-10 (Radverkehr frei) freigegeben sind (oder es sich um Gehwege handelt und auch in die "falsche" Fahrtrichtung Zeichen 239 (Gehweg) und 1022-10 angegeben sind (siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017). Verstöße dagegen sind eine Ordnungwidrigkeit (Regelsatz je nach Beschilderung 20 oder 55 Euro). Zudem ist auf linksseitigen Radwegen das Unfallrisiko acht- bis zehnmal höher. Das wusste ich vor meinem Engagement bei OSM auch nicht. ;-)

Um das Fahrradrouting auf der richtigen Straßenseite zu ermöglichen, wird oneway=yes/no und/oder oneway:bicycle=yes/no getaggt. Meine Ortskunde im Bereich Daxlanden ist nicht lückenlos bzw. frisch. Ich habe aber – auch aufgrund meiner Erfahrungen mit der Straßenverkehrsbehörde und dem Stadtplanungsamt  – erhebliche Zweifel, dass diese Wege alle in beide Richtungen freigegeben sind.

Sind die Wege also wirklich für den Zweirichtungsverkehr freigegeben? Oder hast du dich nur in den Regeln geirrt?

Bitte beachte, dass wir bei OSM die Realität vor Ort mappen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Dinge_so_kartieren.2C_wie_sie_in_der_Realit.C3.A4t_sind) und im Straßenverkehr oft korinthenkackerisches Spurenlesen betreiben müssen, um StVO-konforme Routingergebnisse zu ermöglichen. Falls du ein Geisterradler-Fahrradrouting haben möchtest, möchte ich dich bitten, dein eigenes Routingprofil zu schreiben, das das Tag einfach ignoriert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-09-23 12:35:31+00:00): Keine Antwort, keine Änderungen, dafür die Tage über eindeutig falsche oneway-Einordnungen gestolpert ... Daher nun etliches korrigiert bis auf einen, der so weit angesetzt ist, dass § 2 evtl. nicht zutrifft. Ob das Ende der Vorderstr. wirklich freigegeben ist für Radler, wage ich zu bezweifeln, Google StreetView bestätigt diese Zweifel, müsste man aber noch vor Ort überprüfen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820462436 ist insofern interessant, dass StreetView ein 205 für Falschfahrer an der großen Kreuzung zeigt, aber linksseitig ist nach StVO "irgendwas aus Blech" für eine Freigabe nötig, also oneway wieder dran
luiswoo (2021-12-09 14:37:25+00:00): Какая логика в этих локальных смещениях? Точность это не улучшает, т.к. карта становится перекорёженной. Тут или всё сдвигать по координатам из малодоступного проекта, или использовать для привязки общедоступные треки.
martien-176 (2021-12-09 19:16:09+00:00): Hi, please stop mapping this way? This seems like vandalism and is degrading the quality of the map. In the end vulnerable people on the ground will suffer. Thanks for your cooperation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114678285
user_2066394 (2021-12-09 09:12:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836410374
Die Nr. 74 steht noch bzw. was war da angedacht?
MarioKrammer (2021-12-09 21:03:28+00:00): Nr. 74 und 76 waren zusammen ein Doppelhaus; die Hälfte "Nr. 74" wurde abgetrennt und abgerissen, dann erfolgte eine getrennter Neubau etwa 10 m stadteinwärts, der jetzt Nr. 74 ist
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:55:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114678442
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 02:58:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4925320
Co rozumiesz przez access=private w tej okolicy? Zdjęcia z 2022 nie wskazują na żadną kontrolę wjazdu albo zagrodzenie.
tomzyl (2023-01-25 05:23:12+00:00): Oznakowanie na gruncie i link jako źródło zmian. Mogą parkować tylko mieszkańcy. Mimo braku szlabanów etc
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 06:52:47+00:00): Link jest już martwy 💀
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 06:52:55+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź!
tomzyl (2023-01-25 07:19:48+00:00): https://wlochy.um.warszawa.pl/waw/zgn-wlochy/-/strefa-parkowania-w-rejonie-1-sierpnia-30b-44
aktualny
mmis-berg (2022-01-01 11:11:24+00:00): Dort steht kein Gebäude. Ich hatte ein Stück weiter die Nummern 83 A und 83 B eingetragen. Dies entspricht der Beschriftung vor Ort. Der offizielle Stadtplan der Stadt weicht davon ab, ist aber auch an vielen anderen Stellen fehlerhaft. Maßgeblich sollte die Situation vor Ort sein. Ich schlage vor, das Phantomgebäude zu entfernen.
user_53559 (2022-01-02 14:46:14+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe das Gebäude entfernt.
DUGA (2022-02-01 16:24:58+00:00): Why you set this to oneway=no???

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010059288#map=19/40.30188/-76.44918
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:52:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114678906
Zaneo (2021-12-19 14:16:55+00:00): Thanks for doing bus routes!
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-08 17:32:06+00:00): Ciao Luca. Perdonami, qual è la fonte usata per rinominare questa strada? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236683042 Io sui cartelli leggo "Via Ernia". Ciao, Andrea
tastrax (2022-07-28 12:13:01+00:00): Hi Folks - I noticed some sections of pathway are listed with surface=yes - this is not a normal surface tag. Any chance you check the details?
Maradona11 (2022-07-28 21:56:55+00:00): Hi, thank you for spotting that. [thumbs up].
ottwiz (2021-12-07 23:29:39+00:00): *ponds, lake is bigger than that.
Frans S (2021-12-08 13:58:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are  rather fair but not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114680344
Frans S (2021-12-08 14:01:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114680357
b-holdet (2022-05-25 13:21:02+00:00): Hej antonr,
Kan du hjælpe Lostmonkey med denne note?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3193655

Jeg kan se at Væksthusene har flere underobjekter og da de hver er en del af huset, så kommer de hver til at fremstå som enkelte museer.

Er det noget der kan gøres for at få bygningen udenom til at være museet og de enkelte bygningsdele indeni som være en del af en samlet enhed?
Frans S (2021-12-08 12:45:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
These comments are valid for all your changesets till now.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114680384
Frans S (2021-12-08 14:06:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
These issues are valid for all your changesets till now.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114680535
Frans S (2021-12-08 13:24:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please follow the rooflines rather thant the treeline . ( 1 trace)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114680576
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-08 21:45:31+00:00): destruiu uma rota associada a uma das vias que editou, situação entretanto corrigida, peço mais atenção nas suas edições, cumprimentos
R Felix (2021-12-09 14:25:03+00:00): Discordo, pois tenho a edição correta pendente de aprovação já há uns dias. Esta edição iria ligar com a edição que está pendente. Pode por favor verificar?
A ideia é colocar a ciclovia como lane (left) em tag da avenida almirante reis de ambos os lados, em vez de uma linha independente - como já esteve em tempos, mas agora não está mais.
R Felix (2021-12-09 14:27:44+00:00): Ou seja, esta alteração faz todo o sentido após a aprovação deste changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114637208 - o qual agradeço revisão desde já.
CoyKoi (2021-12-08 08:56:04+00:00): Hi pcuser, welcome to OSM and thank you for your updates to the roads under construction in Graham. I've reviewed your changes and all looks good. Nice work leaving a note on the feature to state that it's an approximate geometry.
mueschel (2021-12-12 10:51:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9319638112
Falsernet (2021-12-13 01:54:57+00:00): Not sure how I managed to screw that up, sorted now. I seemed to be trying to add kerb height and typed it in the middle of a crossing:island tag. Cheers for pointing it out
Frans S (2021-12-08 13:22:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
B: overlapping buildings drawn
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114681051
Wilmer Osario (2021-12-08 15:42:20+00:00): ¡Gracias por contribuir! Estos datos son muy valiosos para nuestro mapa.

Pero deseo saber qué fuentes usa para saber los nombres de estas calles, ¿Los está copiando de otro mapa? ¿O usted mismo conoce o ha recorrido el sector, anotando o memorizando los nombres de las calles?
guaiquerí (2021-12-10 00:13:07+00:00): hola, de nada, conozco el sector y los nombres de edificios o puntos y algunas de las calles, aunque la mayoría no estan señalizadas fisicamente, las fuentes que consulte fueron google maps y wikimapia para las calles que no sabia el nombre
Wilmer Osario (2021-12-10 15:48:18+00:00): Bien, pero no podemos copiar de Google Maps porque aquí en OpenStretMap está prohibido. Debido a que tienen derechos de autor (copyright) que nos lo prohiben.

Le doy gracias por aportar su conocimiento local para mejorar nuestro mapa, que aún le falta trabajo por hacer.

Si lo desea, puede revisar nuestras documentaciones que le ayudarán a entender mejor cómo funciona OpenStretMap:


▪️ Guía para usuarios nuevos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

▪️ Normas y buenas prácticas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas

▪️ Preguntas frecuentes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes
Wilmer Osario (2021-12-10 15:48:33+00:00): Tenemos nuestra comunidad de mapeadores venezolanos en Telegram: https://t.me/OSMve

Y también tenemos nuestra página en el wiki, pero actualmente está en construcción: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela
mavl (2021-12-08 15:15:01+00:00): Hello. This changeset changed the road highway=footway -> highway=motorway. This is a mistake. Please, read:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway  
  
This changeset was reverted.
b-jazz (2021-12-16 17:50:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663291700 got all messed up recently and zig zags across itself. Can you take a look?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-14 14:05:09+00:00): Ciao. Ho dato una sistemata ai numeri civici a Doccio. Il tag addr:street deve essere composto solo dal nome della strada. Il nome della strada è univico nel comune. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114681566
neoLithos (2021-12-10 09:11:23+00:00): Hallo Wielandb.

Hab ich bei dem taggen der Parkplätze etwas falsch gemacht? Wenn ja, kannst du mir das bitte schreiben?

Die Anzahl der Parkplätze wollte ich heute eintragen - nachdem ich vor Ort nachschauen war.

Viele Grüße und schöne Weihnachtszeit.
wielandb (2021-12-10 11:54:52+00:00): Hey :)
Ich dachte, wir hätten darüber schonmal geredet und das wäre nur ein alter CS gewesen, aber das warst gar nicht du! Entschuldige bitte! 

Ja also ich denke das hier statt amenity=parking_space eher amenity=parking passt. 

amenity=parking_space ist eher für einzelne Stellflächen innerhalb eines amenity=parking, und sollte von einem amenity=parking umschlossen werden. [1]
Man kann aber auch amenity=parking Werte wie capacity=* geben wenn du möchtest. Du kannst die Flächen aber auch gerne wieder zurückändern zu parking_space wenn du möchtest, ich finde es sollte am Ende nur ein amenity=parking drumherum sein.
Die Wiki-Seite [1] erklärt das ein bisschen besser als ich es kann. :D

Viele Grüße

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
wielandb (2021-12-10 12:10:21+00:00): Habe es mal wieder zurückgeändert, sodass parking_space wieder da ist und einfach Parkplätze drumherum gemacht. :)
Kelerei (2021-12-13 19:09:59+00:00): I've been thinking about this for the past few days, and it could be debatable whether or not SH 59 should be trunk or primary.  On one hand, it will remain an important through route for a lot of people (which suggests trunk is more appropriate), but on the other, it is after all being supplanted by Transmission Gully (so I totally get where you're coming from).  As such, the case could be made for either option.  Maybe we should take this to the mailing list and get wider consensus?

No complaints however about changing SH 58 to primary between Paremata and Pāuatahanui.  Last I checked, NZTA's intention is to revoke this section as state highway anyway, though the final decision has not yet been taken.  I really don't see anything other than primary being appropriate there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114478600, 114478772, 114478899, 114478935, 114479083, 114479118, 114479174, 114479194, 114479222, 114479238, 114479301, 114479367, 114479393, 114479493, 114479547, 114479659, 114479697, 114479791, 114479866, 114479977, 114480008, 114480069, 114480169, 114480190, 114480260, 114480316.
Kelerei (2021-12-17 01:16:24+00:00): Actually isn't: the signage is partially covered at present, but the bits that aren't clearly show SH 1 as the through route and SH 59 as the diverging route -- which is a bit weird from looking at the road alignment, but true.  I've already done the turn:lanes tagging leading up to the split accordingly.

Any objection if I revert to highway=motorway?
Kelerei (2021-12-17 01:18:34+00:00): This photo from a recent Stuff article illustrates what I'm on about:
https://resources.stuff.co.nz/content/dam/images/4/y/w/9/o/b/image.related.StuffLandscapeSixteenByNine.1240x700.23rtbz.png/1639453700981.jpg?format=pjpg&optimize=medium
kartler175 (2022-01-11 11:05:17+00:00): Why did you remove the from-members fom relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7044818 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7044819
Your Village Maps (2022-01-11 20:55:11+00:00): If I understand you correctly,
then I have just now corrected it. Please check my work. Thanks
SpecializedRider (2021-12-08 15:31:04+00:00): Changeset ID was https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114504563
nmombo12 (2021-12-16 18:37:33+00:00): Hello fattmat58, would you please keep water features tagged water=* in addition to golf=water_hazard? A feature like this can have both tags at the same time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682108
Frans S (2021-12-10 15:22:25+00:00): Hello. 
A remark.  JOSM reports 148 duplicated buildings, mapped by you
Any idea where it went wrong?
mapping on the same tasks with
Diah IRM-ED who saved this task 20 minutes earlier ?
Frans S (2021-12-22 13:49:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682332
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:51:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped, despite the bad visibility on the imagery. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682395
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:49:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You hardly squared a building. (also on your other changesets)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682409
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:27:53+00:00): Hi FahRung. Your edit looks awesome, but I improve water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1010095032) due crossing with highway. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787990). Thank you.
Frans S (2021-12-10 14:51:05+00:00): Hello. A remark
Don't you use the building tool in JOSM? Many of your mappings are not fair squared.

Best regards