piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-04-27 20:10:41+00:00): Olá Paulo, obrigado pelas suas contribuições. Contudo "Habitação Miltifamiliar" não é o nome destes edificios. O nome só deverá ser utilizado por exemplo "Quinta Dom João" ou "Edificio João XXI". Aconselho que quando tiver dúvidas consulte a wiki do OpenStreetMap. Caso tenha dúvidas pode se juntar ao grupo português do Telegram que lhe tiramos as dúvidas. O link do grupo é https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Vou retificar estes nomes que adicionou de forma incorreta.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
eggie (2019-04-27 07:13:56+00:00): merged info with addressnode nr 19
eggie (2019-04-27 07:11:21+00:00): Hi.. Merged info with addressnode 17 BS
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-27 07:08:31+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-27 07:03:51+00:00): Hi nooneisthisimaginative.. please tag at the addressnodes if possible,
greetz,
Eggie
PT-53 (2019-06-07 05:03:19+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686205474 gibt es eine Linie ohne Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-23 05:55:27+00:00): Linie von OSMchecker gelöscht
aytfadc (2019-04-27 09:42:51+00:00): Hello,
i think there is a mistake!
you have delete some relation road (E75, A1,) boundary (balkan, Macedoine, etc..) and the Aegean Sea...
ika-chan! (2019-04-28 08:42:23+00:00): It seems that 69617882, 69617940 69618528 have unintentionally deleted valid data.
ika-chan! (2019-04-28 08:45:02+00:00): ^ Aww man, my grammar is awful. This could have not come at a worse time when there is a serious dispute over road numbers and road naming.
ika-chan! (2019-04-30 17:45:47+00:00): Hello again, when comparing this version of the Aegean Sea relation with the previous version, it appears that Sanwer removed the Macedonian names.

In absence of a good explanation, I see it to be politically motivated. Since OSM is not a political battleground, this could be grounds for a DWG report unless the user can explain the removal. 

Sources:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/4594226/128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/4594226/129
ika-chan! (2019-05-01 17:53:55+00:00): UPDATE: We talked it through and it's all fine. I apologised to the editor for sounding harsh but the Crimea dispute had been really frustrating since OSM does not have to pick a side.
ika-chan! (2019-04-28 08:40:28+00:00): In this changeset, you deleted the relation for National Road 3.
thomas hermant (2019-04-27 19:37:15+00:00): images bing
viloan (2019-04-26 23:02:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-27 02:25:34+00:00): Please do not add fictional features to OSM.
viloan (2019-04-26 23:11:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ikanian (2019-04-26 23:32:33+00:00): Link a la fuente:

https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-04-Puerta-del-Sol/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=202f8fcb00a0b210VgnVCM1000000b205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
ika-chan! (2019-04-28 08:39:36+00:00): You deleted a provincial road relation, but why? I think JOSM is behaving badly.
ikanian (2019-04-26 23:51:05+00:00): Link a la fuente:

https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-06-Casa-de-Campo/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=97248fcb00a0b210VgnVCM1000000b205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
ikanian (2019-04-26 23:58:16+00:00): Link a la fuente:

https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-07-Plaza-de-Oriente/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=02a58fcb00a0b210VgnVCM1000000b205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
ikanian (2019-04-27 00:06:47+00:00): Link a la fuente: https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-08-Plaza-de-Oriente-bis-/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=ec43c861746e4310VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
ikanian (2019-04-27 00:12:04+00:00): Link a la fuente:

https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-09-Madrid-Historico/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=36dfcc7a82a0b210VgnVCM1000000b205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
ikanian (2019-04-27 00:20:47+00:00): Link a la fuente:

https://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/Movilidad-y-transportes/Oficina-de-la-bici/Madrid-en-bici/Red-de-vias-ciclistas/Rutas-turisticas-y-de-ocio/Ruta-10-El-Madrid-de-los-Oficios-y-Artesanos/?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextoid=4763cc7a82a0b210VgnVCM1000000b205a0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=b443d8f887e79210VgnVCM2000000c205a0aRCRD
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-27 02:20:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added a park to the front of a residential house. This isn't the correct use for this tag, check out the OSM wiki for the best and most correct way to map parks and other features - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Feel free to reach out if you need some help :)
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-27 02:24:03+00:00): Hi cptnsunny,

Welcome to OSM! I was just curious what Hamzeh Mystique is supposed to be? Is it a new building? You've mapped it as industrial, what does it produce/work on?
korolenok (2019-05-02 08:44:04+00:00): Hi, prexyloupascual! I noticed you added a primary roads. Seems like a fictional mapping and bad classification. This isn't the correct use for this tag, check out the OSM wiki for the best and most correct way to map roads and other features - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Also I checked you another edits. Please, don't use generic names like "tree", "road" (just stay it unnamed). And use tag natural=wood for POI instead of leisure=park for polygons.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-27 11:17:53+00:00): This does not look like a playground.  What was your source (especially of the name)?
Worldwide Editor (2019-04-27 12:27:48+00:00): openstreetmap.com/edit / ID

Because there is really garden playground
SomeoneElse (2019-04-27 13:09:21+00:00): "because there is" doesn't explain your source.
Worldwide Editor (2019-04-29 08:48:09+00:00): the pictures: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Kompisplatsen/@57.8685602,11.9576552,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x4645614b3ab348fd:0x370ef9b78a1af65c!8m2!3d57.8685574!4d11.9598439
SomeoneElse (2019-04-29 09:07:43+00:00): Unfortunately, you can't use Google Maps in OpenStreetMap.  For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F .
Worldwide Editor (2019-04-29 13:31:17+00:00): right
traveleditor (2019-12-18 09:59:02+00:00): but i uploaded the pictures to google maps
korolenok (2019-05-02 08:42:18+00:00): Hi, Cherry99! I noticed you added a primary roads. Seems like a fictional mapping and bad classification. This isn't the correct use for this tag, check out the OSM wiki for the best and most correct way to map roads and other features - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Also, please, don't use generic names like "tree", "road" (just stay it unnamed). And use tag natural=wood for POI instead of leisure=park for polygons.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69619245
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 01:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69619656 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
andrewwiseman (2019-05-09 19:17:48+00:00): Hello, please don't name roads unless you know their names. This road probably has a highway number, it is not called "Road" -- also you added many roads as primary road. Primary roads are only appropriate for the largest roads in a country. These should probably be unclassified or track. Please refer again to the task Instructions, which says 

highway=tertiary, highway=secondary or highway=primary are used for main roads that connect towns. You should NOT use them for this project, they are already mapped.

Here are other roads that were added as primary too https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69619432#map=13/14.8055/-2.7825
Mazda05 (2019-04-27 02:35:08+00:00): Частичный откат: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69621560, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69621559. Причина: удаление существующего здание, смещение имеющегося магазина на иную позицию, изменение категории многоквартирного дома на более общую категорию жилых домов, некорректное именование рынка
PT-53 (2019-04-27 06:16:06+00:00): Hallo bergfrei,
Du hast in Baach einen Wegweiser eingetragen und mit "name=Baach Marienstraße" versehen.
Für mich ist das kein Eigenname sondern der Standort. Denn könnte man doch mit ref angeben.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
bergfrei (2019-04-29 12:00:22+00:00): Hallo PT53,
der Name steht auf dem Wgeweiser und
entsprechend der  Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:information%3Dguidepost
 und dem Punkt:
"...
name=* 	/optional/ 	Falls der Wegweiser selbst einen Namen trägt, sichtbar an ihm angebracht. ..."
 soll dieser mit TAG "name" eingetragen werden.
Gruß
PT-53 (2019-04-29 12:19:39+00:00): Hallo Bergfrei,
für mich ist das eindeutig die Standort-Angabe und kein Eigenname.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 01:35:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69619394, 69619401.
korolenok (2019-05-02 08:38:46+00:00): Hi, Creezee!  I noticed you added a primary roads. Seems like a fictional mapping and bad classification. This isn't the correct use for this tag, check out the OSM wiki for the best and most correct way to map roads and other features - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Also I checked you another edits. Please, don't use generic names like "tree", "road" (just stay it unnamed). And use tag natural=wood for POI instead of leisure=park for polygons.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69620417
DaveF (2021-09-21 17:26:11+00:00): Hi
Do you know if the NCN diversion is still in place & if the cyclepath is the full length of the road? (Images are inconclusive)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686224872
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-27 02:32:34+00:00): Hi Pierre Leblanc,

It appears that you have published a personal note to the map here. If you're trying to add something verifiable to the map but you're not quite sure how to do it, please feel free to ask for any help you might require :).
Dr Kludge (2019-05-07 01:20:08+00:00): Great job with the new subdivision.
aaronsta (2019-05-01 10:24:51+00:00): Hi sb9576,

Thanks for your edit,
Please ensure that you check / know that features exist, optimally by visiting it in person. As the Perth editing community is small some edits can take weeks if not years to be identified, while other issues can go undetected.
You marked that there were traffic signals on Whatley Crescent in Maylands. That crossing is a Police Traffic Warden controlled Children's Crossing. No traffic signals exist, or are planned.

Cheers,

All the best, aaronsta
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-27 13:33:29+00:00): Hi 5MapathonUTM_Suhaila, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 600 changesets within 3 hours. Thereby, some of your map changes doesn't look that they have been made with the iD editor. Furthermore, some of your changes doesn't seem to be correct.

Can we find some more information about this organised/directed mapping activity in the OSM wiki? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=grabgeostarutm#7/4.335/102.376
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-27 13:31:41+00:00): Hi 8MapathonUTM_Afy, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 650 changesets within 3 hours. Thereby, some of your map changes doesn't look that they have been made with the iD editor. Furthermore, some of your changes doesn't seem to be correct.

Can we find some more information about this organised/directed mapping activity in the OSM wiki? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=grabgeostarutm#7/4.335/102.376
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-27 13:36:40+00:00): Hi 6MapathonUTM_Aizuddin, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 600 changesets within 3 hours. Thereby, some of your map changes doesn't look that they have been made with the iD editor. Furthermore, some of your changes doesn't seem to be correct.

Can we find some more information about this organised/directed mapping activity in the OSM wiki? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=grabgeostarutm#7/4.335/102.376
AkuAnakTimur (2019-04-28 13:53:02+00:00): Hi @pitscheplatsch,

This user is participating in this mapping program: https://news.utm.my/2019/03/grab-geostar-program-2019-for-the-enthusiastic-geoinformatics-students-to-become-mentors-for-community-mappers/
user_5359 (2019-04-27 06:37:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the both values, please?
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-27 13:36:37+00:00): Hi 5MapathonUTM_Hannah, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 600 changesets within 3 hours. Thereby, some of your map changes doesn't look that they have been made with the iD editor. Furthermore, some of your changes doesn't seem to be correct.

Can we find some more information about this organised/directed mapping activity in the OSM wiki? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=grabgeostarutm#7/4.335/102.376
stevea (2019-04-27 08:55:17+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are."  Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

As not even the source of WHICH imagery was used (nor its offset), this amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons, at least one commercial landuse and a park was removed, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
Adamant1 (2019-04-27 09:44:33+00:00): "This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism." 

I knew you were going to take that route after you repeatedly told me to stop discussing things and just edit them. I specifically asked if you were going to do that to and you said you weren't. Pretty petty and vindictive. 

As far as your complaints goes, the boundaries fits the imagery a lot better then the SCCGIS does. It had the industrial area mapped out into the woods. Which it isn't, the SCCGIS data was also wrong on a bunch of other stuff. Like miss-tagging retail areas as commercial areas, and the whole none extant park thing. Btw, for anyone interested I can provide the changeset comments about the parks and Stevea saying to go ahead and edit things. He obviously did it as a feckless tactic to try and set me up. 

Stevea, feel free to report me for vandalism to an admin. I don't really care. It's clear from the discussions that you gave me the go ahead, including by telling me multiple times to "shut the fu*k up and map." It's also clear from the evidence I laid out in the discussion and your lack of it that the parks don't exist. Along with your lame attempt at making them parks by mapping path's you knew didn't exist. Which is actual vandalism btw. So put your money where your mouth is and report me for vandalism. I DARE YOU! Otherwise, to quote you "shut the fu*k up." about it.
stevea (2019-04-27 09:53:53+00:00): Yes, "shut up and map" on my part turned into vandalism on your part.  While you might make a case I was rude, I can and do make a case you are a vandal.
Adamant1 (2019-04-27 20:16:29+00:00): You must have not been able to, or I 100% guarantee you would have. Especially after all the copulating about it on the park talk page and getting me banned. Which is why you decided to just edit war me and revert my edits yourself. Oh well. Another day, another fake controversy by Stevea to deflect from the actual issues and his own behavior. 

Btw, whatever happened to the whole "I'm getting you banned for vandalism" thing? It seems I can still edit and I haven't received a message from anyone in the DWG about it. People shouldn't accuse of other's of being vandals without having solid clear evidence for it. It's not an accusation to make lightly. Hopefully you learned your lesson and you'll leave me alone now. I hope so. Otherwise, you'll just look like the boy who cried wolf and know one will take you seriously when real vandalism actually happens. 

Bye, bye. Go bully someone else now.
kadircelik (2019-04-27 06:01:28+00:00): dont name arabic names in Turkish Soils
yakra (2019-04-28 15:49:38+00:00): For Plain. Singular. One plain. :)
korolenok (2019-05-04 08:49:19+00:00): Hi! Please, don't use highway=tertiary tag for all roads. You can read the wiki article about hierarchy of roads. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69627201
stevea (2019-04-27 09:45:45+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

As not even the source of WHICH imagery layer/source was used (nor its offset), this amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons were removed, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-05-03 15:25:43+00:00): Salam, biar betul ada papan tanda Jalan Masjid kat situ.

Papan tanda nama Jalan Kodiang kat lampu isyarat tengah pekan ada lah.
user_5359 (2019-04-27 06:36:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
stevea (2019-04-27 09:47:00+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

As not even the source of WHICH imagery layer/source was used (nor its offset), this amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons, at least one commercial landuse and a park was removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
stevea (2019-04-27 09:48:44+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

As not even the source of WHICH imagery layer/source was used (nor its offset), this amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons and at least one commercial landuse were removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
Road–Runner (2019-05-02 18:16:50+00:00): hello, your edits on mapsme are not correct, they don't represent the reality (eg. hermes is no gift shop), please read implicitly the https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome page before editing.
stevea (2019-04-27 10:49:36+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

From which of three imagery_used layers?

This amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons and at several commercial landuse were removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
stevea (2019-04-27 10:48:17+00:00): Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

From which of three imaging sources cited?

This amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons and at least one commercial landuse were removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.