piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
whatmeinfallible (2019-01-14 17:41:42+00:00): I think you're referring to way 308170533, way 308170530, and way 308170529, three segments of the P47 highway just east of Alili at 41.9800,59.6523. I noticed that all three ways had the incorrect ref data "Soviet military topographic maps". However, if you consult the history of these road segments, you'll find that this bad data was introduced by user Klimakas in early 2016, in changeset 38064979. Here are the way history and Achavi changeset viewer links; please reach out to me if you need any assistance in finding or interpreting the history of OSM data.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38064979
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308170533/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308170530/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308170533/history
Thanks.
gscholz (2018-11-17 08:09:01+00:00): Hi Vykynga,
this changset has caused several errors in the OSM database:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-66.79676&lat=10.47739&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix them?
Kind Regards
Guido
ulmtuelp (2018-11-18 16:48:42+00:00): not connected ways with intersections and duplicate nodes, not really to see in PNOA Spain / Bing / Grafcan background images.
You're really sure  about this?
ulmtuelp (2018-11-18 19:44:33+00:00): > Hi Ulmtuelp, What is the problem: I added several paths the same day, which one(s) do bother you? They are all paths I have walked. Isabelle

See it here:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-15.59264&lat=28.03014&zoom=16
viloan (2018-11-16 18:54:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
b-jazz (2018-11-17 02:02:01+00:00): Two single-node ways and 8 nodes without tags that were all in the same location were removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64587379
viloan (2018-11-16 19:13:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rab (2018-11-16 19:52:18+00:00): Hi, 
please load this area again. Go to the Josm Validation panel and click on the Validation button. You should now get some error messages. Like 30 crossing highways, 25 crossing buildings and so on. Only after all errors are cleared you can set the tile status to validated. With your latest changesets you have introduced far more errors as you may have fixed
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-17 22:58:47+00:00): TIGER gets this wrong, these are unnamed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64580147
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-17 22:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64608707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting incorrect addition of names to unnamed roads.
BatMan1234 (2018-11-16 20:45:40+00:00): Based on aerial and field survey 08/28/2017
viloan (2018-11-16 19:33:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_2954791 (2020-04-29 05:49:13+00:00): Frage, kann der Knoten: 6067165681 entfernt werden oder welchen Sinn hat er?
ThisDuck (2020-04-29 21:02:38+00:00): 3D der Pagode war glaube ich soweit fertig. Hatte dann keine Zeit mehr für ein Clean-Up. Nun auch keine zum prüfen. Wenn es sinnvoll erscheint, dann danke fürs aufräumen!
aceman444 (2018-12-02 02:16:24+00:00): Making up your own road classification again?

Reverted.
aceman444 (2018-12-02 02:22:21+00:00): And removing Kamenne namestie, one of the most important squares in the city. Can't you really pay attention to what you are doing?
Durko_freemap (2018-11-16 19:55:26+00:00): dost by ma zaujimalo, preco nicis tu mapu
Durko_freemap (2018-11-18 11:48:20+00:00): zaznaceny neexistujuci vyjazd - revert
literan (2018-11-17 10:16:51+00:00): не надо писать вид топлива в название заправки. Откат
Durko_freemap (2018-11-18 11:50:42+00:00): tieto highway=trunk neexistuju - revert
Frans S (2018-11-17 10:42:43+00:00): Hi Canyonsrcool. Thanks for mapping here. The aim is to clarify tertiary highways which you did. However, there are lots of loose pieces of highways . Please complete these where possible and connect them to the road network.  Check also the tagging. Many traces (paths)  are wide enough to be driven by cars. so residential or unclassified should be appropriate.   Best regards. Frans
rab (2018-11-17 19:18:02+00:00): Frans S,
I sometimes recomment to  estimate the width of a road this way:

In Josm zoom in until the scale reads ~ 5m
Draw a 3m line underneath the scale. While the line is still highlighted hit "cntl" + "o". Now you have a circle 3m in diamter. Move this circle over the roads. Only when this circle fits over the complete waylenght, the road can be tagged as "track" or better. In doubt, always tag the next lower classification, or don't map the road/path at all.

In my Opinion all this ways should be tagged as path.
 
This Document here might also be a good reference for road tagging in Africa:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OSPFZsTLr-QbJjLSUT3ZTRm08OdoH__T/view
Canyonsrcool (2018-11-19 19:08:46+00:00): Thanks
wambacher (2018-11-17 02:10:07+00:00): Schiebung!!!
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-17 07:29:29+00:00): Die Note hat aber recht, ist aufm Luftbild ziemlich klar zu sehen :) Ich schau mir nachher mal an, wie der nach Osten weitergeht, und ob „Craponner Anlage“ wirklich ein unbesiedelter Fleck ist (place=locality) oder ob einfach der Park so heißt. Auch wenn das einklich dein Mappingrevier ist :D :D
wambacher (2018-11-17 11:43:34+00:00): Moin, schlechte Laune? Das sollte ein Wortspiel sein ;)

Danke für's Anpassen.
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-17 12:00:47+00:00): Soll ich noch mehr Smileys reinmachen? Neinnein, keine schlechte laune :) aber gleich tut sich Gewaltiges.
Durko_freemap (2018-11-18 11:52:15+00:00): znova, tieto highway=trunk neexistuju
GerdP (2018-11-18 14:15:01+00:00): Hi! Why did you change a part of the track to highway=guessed_track?
Bing shows a way close to the way, so I wonder what to do.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645428209
Dr Udo Brömme (2018-11-19 18:47:15+00:00): I haven't used Bing, but rather some newer imagery. I don't remember whether it was DigitalGlobe or Mapbox. I could clearly see, that the track runs way off the mapped one.
GerdP (2018-11-19 18:55:19+00:00): Why didn't you improve the position?
Dr Udo Brömme (2018-11-20 01:11:40+00:00): Weil das dichter Wald ist könnte man hier höchstens mit Winteraufnahmen arbeiten. Da wo der Pfad durchblitzt liegt er weit daneben. Kein realer Pfad ist so zackig wie es jetzt gemappt ist.
GerdP (2018-11-20 06:35:08+00:00): Ich habe den Weg mal dort gezeichnet, wo ich ihn auf Bing sehe und wieder mit dem originalen Track verbunden. Bing ist hier etwas versetzt, zeigt aber den Weg sehr gut.
Habe dabei dummerweise zuerst die Historie des alten Wegs vernichtet, aber jetzt sollte es passen.
Ansonsten: Wenn man etwas auf einer Luftaufnahme nicht sieht bedeutet das nicht, dass es falsch ist.
Bitte in Zukunft erst mal die anderen Luftaufnahmen anschauen und dann evtl. entweder den Mapper kontaktieren oder ein fixme dranhängen. Luftaufnahmen sind ja auch nie lagegenau und können in den Bergen auch sehr verzerrt sein.
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden
Durko_freemap (2018-11-18 11:54:13+00:00): zaznacene dalsie neexistujuce objekty
viloan (2018-11-16 20:42:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jose Riha (2018-11-18 13:41:53+00:00): Ahoj,

všimli sme si, že si nedávno začal prispievať do projektu OpenStreetMap. Takýto počin je vo všeobecnosti veľmi vítaný, nakoľko vyšší počet prispievateľov obvykle znamená aj zrýchlenie tempa aktualizácií mapových podkladov alebo ich celkové skvalitnenie. Bohužiaľ máme pocit, že si celkom neporozumel obsahu a poslaniu tohto projektu.

Všetky zmeny, ktoré v mape urobíš a odošleš sa okamžite stávaju "produkčnými". Do hry nevstupuje žiaden moderátor, ktorý by Tvoje úpravy ešte schvaľoval. Vzhľadom na to, že Tvoje úpravy - vnímané ako zakresľovanie fiktívnych ciest (rýchlostná cesta krížom cez les) - nie sú žiadúce, boli tieto úpravy odstránené (revertnuté). Uvedom si prosím, že do editácie máp vložili tisícky ľudí enormné množstvo svojho voľného času, osobných zdrojov a to na úkor ich pohodlia, času stráveného s rodinou či priateľmi. Od prispievateľov sa takisto očakáva komunikácia s členmi komunity.

Prosím, vezmi tiež na zreteľ fakt, ze internet už dávno nie je anonymný a ak budeš i naďalej pokračovať vo vedomom poškodzovaní údajov môže to zakladať trestno-právnej zodpovednosti (poškodzovanie cudzej veci).

S prianím pekného dňa,

jose, v mene OSM komunity
maraf24 (2018-11-17 20:01:46+00:00): Dodane godziny otwarcia.
ggando_lyft (2018-11-19 19:22:55+00:00): Hello rdnaskela23! 
For way 644955975, I was wondering if this was below street level, to prevent intersecting way errors? 
Thank you, 
Gizelle
rdnaskela23 (2018-11-19 20:20:33+00:00): Hi, no, the entrance is street level, but what is it intersecting? the only segments i think it intersects are the two overpasses which have a higher layer
ggando_lyft (2018-11-19 20:29:59+00:00): Thank you for your response! 
I am wondering which imagery you are using? Based on the imagery in iDeditor way 644955975 does not appear aligned. 
Thanks!
rdnaskela23 (2018-11-19 20:38:26+00:00): No problem. So the Parking Structure is in the imagery. the existing roads i'm estimating based on my recent drive, and the under construction roads are a mix of construction plans and the recent drive.
Being the area is under construction a lot of things are changing frequently, but i'm trying to keep it as close to reality as possible.
rdnaskela23 (2018-11-19 20:40:36+00:00): But there is a chance it changed since I last saw it, I was last in there a couple months ago. although i do drive by on the grand central very frequently to see major ramp changes
ggando_lyft (2018-11-19 21:48:31+00:00): Thank you for your responses! Given this is an area under construction I will not make major changes to the ramps. 
Best regards, 
Gizelle
kartonage (2018-11-17 17:41:52+00:00): Hallo Pitaro,

bitte nicht einfach so irgendwelche Tags ändern, welche du vielleicht nicht kennst. Das Gelände war richtig getaggt und ist auch nicht ganzflächig ein Gebäude. (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Ddepot). Danke fürs Beachten.

Schöne Grüße
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 13:52:45+00:00): Bonjour Raph,
Vous avez ajouté un double sens cyclable sur bande sur cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48861675). Pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'il y a bien une bande dédiée au vélo à contre-sens ? je trouve ça étonnant sur une zone de rencontre mais possible néanmoins et il y a souvent une confusion entre cycleway=opposite qui décrit un double sens cyclable et cycleway=opposite_lane qui décrit un double sens cyclable sur bande.
Je corrige dans ce sens dans un premier temps mais je reviendrai sur ma contribution si vous me confirmez qu'il y a bien une bande.
Cordialement.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 13:54:14+00:00): Précision, je me base aussi sur les photos Mapillary de juin 2018 qui ne me laissent pas apercevoir de bande cyclable.
Cordialement.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
raph03 (2018-11-26 17:51:35+00:00): Bonsoir
Il existe bien une bande cyclable sur la rue Pierre Genouville dans la partie qui est à sens unique. Il y a un marquage avec les vélos verts au sol, pour remonter la rue (parking) à vélo en direction de la rue du Hameau. J'ai mis cet attribut car cette rue était sinon vue comme "à sens unique"
Carto'Cité (2018-11-27 16:36:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces précisions. Justement pour pouvoir parler de bande cyclable, qu'elle soit dans le sens de circulation ou à contre sens, il faut un marquage de type bande blanche (pointillée ou autre) qui crée une voie (lane) dédiée aux vélo. S'il n'y a que des pictogrammes de vélo c'est un simple double sens cyclable (FSC) lorsque le sens de circulation des vélos est à contre sens de  celui des voiture et un shared_lane lorsqu'il est dans le même sens. Un DSC sans bande se décrit  cycleway=opposite ; cycleway=oppositr_lane est pour les DSC avec bande. Vous aviez peut-être déjà ces informations mais pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'il y a une voie dédiée ?
Cordialement.
Charles de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
raph03 (2018-11-27 18:13:47+00:00): c'est donc bien moi qui me suis mélangé les pinceaux, désolé :
- il y a bien les pictogrammes de vélo en vert pour autoriser ces derniers à prendre à contre-sens
- il n'y a pas de bande blanche pour séparer ce flux vélo des voitures
=> donc DSC avec cycleway=opposite
Carto'Cité (2018-11-27 21:00:02+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour votre retour !
Charles de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
mueschel (2018-11-25 14:56:57+00:00): Please be careful when editing nodes - this changeset caused quite some mess with roads I fixed right now. 
The green lines you can see here are the roads you created:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64583021
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 14:07:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez changé ce way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588309753) de path à cycleway. J'imagine qu'il s'agit d'une voie verte, dans ce cas, highway=path reste la pratique admise pour ce type d'aménagement mais il est possible d'ajouter traffic_sign=FR:C115 par contre pour préciser la présence du panneau voies verte.
Cordialement.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
raph03 (2018-11-26 18:03:13+00:00): Ma modification (si je ne me trompe pas, ce n'est pas évident juste avec les numéros d'objets) portait sur l'ajout, au coin SO du stade de foot, d'un petit parking et de la voie qui relie le chemin piéton+vélo qui longe le gymnase Pellouard à la rue Caruel de Saint-Martin en passant par ledit parking.
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 14:00:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Cycleway=yes n'indique rien de précis. Pouvez-vous m'expliquer quel type d'aménagement cyclable présente la Rue du Général Welvert pour que nous la reprenions ensemble ?
Merci d'avance.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
raph03 (2018-11-26 17:58:09+00:00): La rue du Général Welvert est à sens unique et possède une bande cyclable (vélos verts peints au sol, côté droit, dans le même sens que la circulation).

La coquille sur la carte se situe au niveau de la barrière (qui figure sur la carte) de la rue Guynemer entre l'impasse René Mouchotte et la rue du Général Welvert : cette barrière ne permet pas le passage des automobiles (alors que la carte indique un passage pour tous). Seuls les piétons, les vélos et je pense cavaliers et motos (difficilement) peuvent passer cette barrière
Jose Riha (2018-11-17 15:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64598886.
mueschel (2018-11-25 15:02:52+00:00): For every data source you use, you have to make sure that the Terms of Use are compatible with the license of OSM. Data from yelp and google maps MUST not be used.
Jose Riha (2018-11-17 15:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64598886.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-18 00:19:32+00:00): Seems like this is an unnamed driveway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64584183
KanaLee (2018-11-19 17:24:48+00:00): Thanks for the catch! Name edit has been reverted in changeset 64666137.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-17 23:16:52+00:00): This is an unnamed street, not New Sapulpa Road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64584623
KanaLee (2018-11-19 17:34:20+00:00): Thank you for catching that! Name edit has been reverted in changeset 64666471.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-17 23:19:51+00:00): These ways definitely do not have names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64584663
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-17 23:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64609007 where the changeset comment is: Reverting because the ways had names added when the ways are not named in reality.
kwametedros (2018-11-19 17:25:58+00:00): Thanks for the correction.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-18 00:17:01+00:00): Names are only the names.  State Highway 117 is not a name, it's a ref.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64585384
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-18 00:17:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64609710 where the changeset comment is: Highway numbers are not names.
kwametedros (2018-11-19 17:25:30+00:00): Thanks for the correction.
pio2_122 (2018-11-17 08:36:12+00:00): Adresy są na budynkach, dublowanie ich jest dość słabym pomysłem.
pio2_122 (2018-11-17 08:41:57+00:00): Jeszcze jedno: nazwy skrótów rozwijamy (chodzi mi o ROD-y)
pio2_122 (2018-11-17 08:43:10+00:00): Kolejne: Makro to hurtownia...
literan (2018-11-17 10:25:49+00:00): выдуманные названия и парки вычищены. Покемоны не придут.
marupally (2018-11-19 12:45:46+00:00): Hello Firelans,

Trust my  message finds you well.

While reviewing the restrictions coded in Singapore, I found that few of them are edited by you, by removing either via nodes are from/to way-ids.
Can you please explain the reason so that we can calibrate

Here are few example node-ids which are edited by you.
relation-8919131 - from/to way ids deleted
node 5599381629 - via node id is deleted
relation- 8878053 - via way id is deleted
Thanks
Marupally
marupally (2018-11-22 14:28:08+00:00): hello Firelans,

I had corrected it back again.

Thanks
Marupally
Firelans (2018-11-24 02:11:31+00:00): Hi Marupally

Sorry for the late respond.

I took reference from OneMap.com and also revisited this place. No turning circle at T-junction was found between Evergreen Avenue and Upper East Coast Road. Please let me know if you need the photographs and/or map for your consideration.

Thank and regards
Firelans
marupally (2018-11-26 07:49:45+00:00): Hello Firelans,

Thanks for taking time to confirm.
Not sure on how the geometry got aligned to reflect a circle pattern.  A mistake from an user - jyo_1
When this geometry alignment was corrected by you, existing relation for restrictions were disturbed, for which we wanted to check with you on the reason.

Once again thanks for confirming.  We however made appropriate correction to the broken restrictions

Thanks
Marupaly
mweper (2018-11-17 11:14:39+00:00): Hola @ElGuruCesar, que gusto que colabores por aquí. Tuve el atrevimiento de modificar/corregir algunos PDI hechos por ti, basándome en la Wiki, datos de OSM y mi experiencia en OSM.
-
Si quieres ver los cambios hechos por mi te dejo el enlace: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=64593281
-
Recuerda que si se desconoce el nombre de un PDI o se conoce que no tiene, no se debe añadir la etiqueta «name» con el nombre de la categoría.
Más info sobre esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres
-
Saludos. @mweper
viloan (2018-11-17 00:48:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-11-17 06:51:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.