piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-09-16 14:47:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please map buildings individual. Do not cluster buildings.


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110972785
Frans S (2021-09-16 14:27:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
PLease square the rectangular buildings with the Q key after mapping
Best regards and keep mapping
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-09 15:22:42+00:00): Hi! How do you know this street is no longer oneway? You cannot derive this data from sat images.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110973144
sbelemey (2021-09-16 14:04:59+00:00): Hi!
thank you for your feedback.
yes, unfortunately, this was not visible in my images. I agree, the traffic is oneway.
Best regards!
Frans S (2021-09-16 14:30:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping  by following the rooflines
Square each rectangular building

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110973181
salvoconducto (2021-10-19 15:42:50+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9076542964 a building=entrance?
Halbtax (2021-10-20 07:05:24+00:00): According to my information it is. Do you have other information?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-09 15:29:18+00:00): Hi! This bridge was restored at the end of Apr 2021 but I doubt you could derive this data from sat images. Anyway, traffic is oneway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110973266
sbelemey (2021-09-16 13:35:39+00:00): Hi!
thank you for your feedback. 
yes, unfortunately, this was not visible in my images. I agree, the traffic is oneway.
Best regards!
AlexFringilla (2021-09-19 09:04:58+00:00): Он же не на улице? Ставьте объекты на контур или внутри здания.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Sandal man (2021-09-19 07:43:42+00:00): Way without tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981271112
AlexFringilla (2021-09-19 09:13:30+00:00): У дома 9к4 точно непрямые углы? :D Зачем вы разъединили дома, если они стоят вплотную друг к другу?
maro21 (2021-09-09 19:11:44+00:00): Nie mapuj z nieaktualnych zdjęć - skrzyżowanie zostało przebudowane w 2020 roku: https://fotopolska.eu/1790355,foto.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-10 10:33:21+00:00): Dag gjan,
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me prima zo, wanr het zijn vrijliggende voetpaden en die kun je gewoon intekenen.
MVG
eggie
Echo78 (2021-10-03 09:24:35+00:00): Добрый день. Г. Москва, Духовской пер-к, 16. Вы тег was убрали на основании чего? Пункт снова открыт (был закрыт) или на автомате "причесали"?
Echo78 (2021-10-03 09:25:21+00:00): Забыл уточнить, пишу про пункт выдачи ozon
Hokkosha (2021-09-09 22:44:58+00:00): はまなすの丘公園を公園ではないとして巨大な建物に変更されていましたが、航空写真から建物ではないことが明らかなため、この編集を書き戻して公園に再修正しました。
ご不明な点がありましたらコメントください。
4004 (2021-09-16 15:05:16+00:00): здравствуйте,
опять pharmacy
4004 (2021-09-16 15:17:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9076587846 community_centre?
aTarom (2022-07-02 10:37:53+00:00): Hola Jordi MF,
sembla que es va quedar "penjat" :D un node amb
"natural"="Mola de la Carabassera"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9076653862/history
Salutacions
Jordi MF (2022-07-03 12:19:58+00:00): Vaja, gràcies. Ho corregiré de seguida que puga.
Lee Carré (2021-09-18 23:14:56+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
alexashh (2021-09-09 14:17:37+00:00): Привет! На сайте OSM нет администраторов, правки принимаются автоматически, сразу при отправке на сервер. 
А вот отображение данных сервера в виде карты может занять какое-то время - обычно не больше суток.
iWowik (2021-09-09 14:34:54+00:00): Вишня это не собственное название конкретного дерева, его не пишут в name
danieldegroot2 (2021-10-08 21:14:17+00:00): Hey openMvD,

Je kan de "note" op de draaideuren bij Aurora gerust weghalen als je ze hebt gesurveyeerd.

Voor de ingangen van de fietskelder (toevoeging "access=no") wellicht goed om een fixme toe te voegen om later opnieuw te surveyeren, of anders te veranderen naar access=* als je daar al zeker van bent.

Groet,

Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-11 09:33:02+00:00): Ciao. Il tag addr:unit serve per specificare l'interno e non l'esponente (ovvero la parte letterale di un numero civico). L'esponente deve essere inserito nel tag addr:housenumber inseme al numero stesso, senza separatori. Ciao, Andrea
madbob (2021-09-16 08:10:39+00:00): Oops... Credo di aver reiterato questo errore numerose volte, in passato, grazie della segnalazione!
Filip009 (2021-09-21 16:55:57+00:00): Dobrý deň, do budúcnosti odporúčam pridávať telefónne čísla v medzinárodnom formáte (+421 XXX XXX XXX).
PizzaCutter (2021-09-21 21:01:19+00:00): Ok, dík
Puxan (2021-09-17 08:36:39+00:00): Hello @WotanF ,

I am mapping and validating within a project in Nepal where I see that you have removed a tag of landuse = farmland. It seems to me that the label was correct, although it encompasses several residential areas that must be identified. Although the specific project (8942) does not ask for the mapping of areas, it is not wrong to map them.

You do not have to eliminate what is real from a map. Now the map contains a way without a label, we see a line but this line does not represent anything. I think before deleting the tag you should have discussed it with the author.

At the moment I am not modifying the map and I leave it with your change waiting for your response.

Alright, keep mapping.

Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110976612
WotanF (2021-11-29 20:16:41+00:00): I don't agree with this "bad review".

"You do not have to eliminate what is real from a map" is a dirty smear and everybody may check for himself that the deleted way contained a dozen of different landuses and was simply wrong:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110976612
eggie (2021-09-10 19:41:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2021-09-13 17:30:27+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981252336
Olga | Yanosik (2021-09-13 19:02:21+00:00): Repaired, sorry, my mistake :)
ff5722 (2021-09-10 16:25:05+00:00): Hi, you added a place of worship spanning the entire city, I had to remove it, can you draw the correct boundary again if needed?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981252440

It is explained here on how to create administrative boundaries: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
user_5359 (2021-09-10 08:48:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your entry is a duplicat entry see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82106029
gscholz (2021-09-18 05:57:55+00:00): Hi Raphaelkaart,
your recent edits have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected roads (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-39.33566&lat=-8.02292&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you may know, these roads cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please re-think your editing process how to avoid this error?
Kind Regards
Guido
Raphaelkaart (2021-09-18 11:46:17+00:00): Hello,
Good Morning!

I fixed the Roads that were wrongly mapped by min to paths and made the connection of some roads that were not connected.

Yours sincerely,

Raphaelkaart
PT-53 (2021-09-10 06:31:15+00:00): Hallo  srikmar,
ist hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981259504/history
wirklich ein Kreisel ?
Ich kann dort jedenfalls keinen Kreisel erkennen !
Grüße
srikmar (2021-09-14 07:37:56+00:00): Hi PT-53, 
Thanks for looking into my edit. Apologies for the misinterpretation, as the tree in the junction appeared as roundabout. I have now modified the geometry of the driveways as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset #111178869 with modifications. Regards,
srikmar
Claudius Henrichs (2021-10-05 11:41:22+00:00): Hi,
Can you please clarify why you deleted many of station nodes along Cairo Metro line 1? Station nodes are not identical to stop positions that you left behind. Actually the stop positions only are fully usable if they are connected to stations via a stop_area relation.
zaizone (2021-10-06 20:10:29+00:00): Hi Claudius, thanks for asking. My main goal was to complete the 3 subway lines, adding all new extensions. I have taken care to keep all stations (points or polygons) when adding stop positions on the railways, please  check: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bNL . It has been a hard work to homogenize all, with arab english and french names. I have also made route relations on both ways in each line. I agree with you, stop_area relations are still missing... I could work on these one of these days. Help is welcome. Cheers
Futur3r (2021-09-09 15:29:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Le bâtiment existait déjà, donc il suffisait uniquement de rajouter un nœud avec les tags dessus.

Ne rajoutez pas les adresses sur les POI, c'est à part.

Tant qu'à faire pour le parking vous pouviez le faire entièrement en évitant de connecter le poly du parking à la voie de circulation.

Et les tags pour le magasins n'était pas bon, il ne suffit pas de rajouter le nom et une description, il faut un tag descriptif (shop=bed dans ce cas là) et le nom avec name=*. 

Aidez vous du wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bed

Merci pour votre contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110978344
Joe-w (2021-09-09 16:02:06+00:00): No issues here - nice to see more details added to buildings!
A67-A67 (2021-09-09 13:56:54+00:00): Correcte commentaar: Update rotonde Middenweg.
user345 (2021-09-09 14:05:33+00:00): Hoppla, ich meine natürlich Südwesten^^
wonderb0lt (2021-09-09 14:14:36+00:00): source = bing, not local_knowledge
wonderb0lt (2021-09-09 14:14:30+00:00): source = bing, not local_knowledge
Wilmer Osario (2021-09-10 13:51:06+00:00): ¡Gracias por contribuir! Le he hecho algunas mejoras para adaptarlo mejor al mapa
Henosb (2021-09-09 20:19:07+00:00): Maxar SecureWatch Imagery  2021-06-16
multimodaal (2021-09-15 09:29:21+00:00): Hoi, dank voor je bijdrage. Je hebt hier oa een fietspad geheel verwijderd. De verharding is inderdaad weg, maar dit laat doorgaans nog wel een tijdje waarneembare sporen in het veld na. Ook geeft dit kans op opnieuw intekenen van het pad door andere mappers op basis als bronnen zoals AHN, Mapillary, Strava etc en het zoeken naar verwijdere objecten in OSM  werkt helaas ook bepaald niet optimaal. Heb het pad daarom teruggezet als abandoned:highway, dat kan opnieuw intekenen en speurtochten voorkomen. 
Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Als er in de database een nieuw element staat dat het verdwijnen verklaart dan kan een pad wel helemaal weg, denk bijvoorbeeld aan een waterpartij en een groot gebouw dat op de plek van een voormalig pad is gebouwd. Groet!
Martin Borsje (2021-09-09 17:41:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2021-09-09 17:40:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-09 15:20:18+00:00): Olá, o bairro possui campo específico e não deve ser colocado com o nome da via
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110981864
MadsonMedeiros (2021-09-09 15:26:13+00:00): Olá, está o nome completo da rua. ele realmente é assim. você pode conferir no site dos correios https://buscacepinter.correios.com.br/app/endereco/index.php?t digitando o nome da rua, houve uma atualização pela prefeitura. parece estranho, mas é como foi feito.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110981864
CapitaineMoustache (2021-09-15 11:31:12+00:00): Oups, les bandes cyclables sont déjà renseignées sur l'Avenue de Verdun par des tags dédiés, de plus, vous avez tracé des pistes cyclables (highway=cycleway), ce qui ne correspond pas au terrain : il s'agit bien de bandes cyclables (marquage au sol sans séparation matérielle avec la route).

Je suggèrerais donc d'annuler ce groupe de modification aussi.
Je peux m'en charger si vous voulez.

N'hésitez pas pour toute question !
Bonne cartographie !
CapitaineMoustache (2021-09-21 14:04:09+00:00): Bien que n'ayant pas eu de réponse de votre part, j'ai cru bon de procéder à une annulation de ces modifications, voir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111498580.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des remarques ou des questions !

Bonne cartographie !
user_1566574 (2021-09-11 09:47:35+00:00): Salut !
Les n° de téléphone s'écrivent +33 3 81... et non 03 81...
C'est une norme d'édition définie par une norme ISO, avec le préfixe international Français "+33".
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone

Merci ! :)
CapitaineMoustache (2021-09-21 14:04:36+00:00): Bien que n'ayant pas eu de réponse de votre part, j'ai cru bon de procéder à une annulation de ces modifications, voir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111498244.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des remarques ou des questions !

Bonne cartographie !
Vin92 (2021-09-09 21:09:52+00:00): Delete this Item
user_1566574 (2022-05-06 16:30:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Cet élément a-t-il été ajouté par erreur ? Est-il possible d'avoir plus d'informations à ce sujet ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077178437

Merci d'avance ! :)
PT-53 (2021-09-10 06:45:59+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
Zwiefaltendorf wächst ja wieder weiter stark an.  :-))
Grüße
user_1566574 (2021-09-11 09:52:10+00:00): Salut !
Content de voir que tu t'es mis à JOSM !

Alors, petite note, indiquer la page Facebook comme site Web divise la communauté OSM. (Perso j'y suis favorable SI le commerce n'a pas d'autre site Web et travaille uniquement Facebook).

• Au lieu de définir :
website=https://facebook.com/....
• Considérer :
contact:facebook=https://facebook.com

Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
Partagé à titre informatif. Merci à toi ! :)
CapitaineMoustache (2021-09-15 11:21:35+00:00): Bonjour Anvallus,
j'attire votre attention que la Véloire est une voie verte et qu'elle ne constitue pas une piste cyclable en tant que telle.
Les voies vertes sont habituellement taggées en highway=path :https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes.
Je suggèrerais donc d'annuler les modifications faites dessus (procédure revert), n'hésitez pas à aller sur le forum OSM pour demander de l'aide (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/).

Je vois d'ailleurs que vous semblez très impliqué autour des infrastructures cyclables aussi je vous invite à lire la page wiki OSM "FR:Bicycle" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle) qui rassemble toutes les bonnes pratiques autour des aménagements vélo !
CapitaineMoustache (2021-09-21 14:05:30+00:00): Bien que n'ayant pas eu de réponse de votre part, j'ai cru bon de procéder à une annulation de ces modifications, voir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111498210.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des remarques ou des questions !

Bonne cartographie !
Harry Wood (2021-09-10 09:21:16+00:00): This is deleting data added in this original changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78334047 

Some more discussion here on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/pkyrjq/uh_is_this_a_joke/
SimonPoole (2021-09-10 09:26:54+00:00): The most annoying thing about this that two people busy mapped tags on this after it was added but didn't bother to check anything (it is clear from the information in the original changeset that this was not real).
AlexFringilla (2021-09-19 08:57:37+00:00): Вы будете каждый год менять значение тега crop при ежегодном севообороте?
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 08:56:15+00:00): please align imagery first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110984180
WingardiumMapiosa (2022-12-08 19:55:02+00:00): Hi, Violaine_Do, DunAonghasa is no longer with the team, but I reviewed the data and found that it was fixed in 2021 based on your inputs. Can you please check the previous changeset discussion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109852697#map=14/-17.4887/-149.7628) and let me know if there is anything that was missed previously? Thanks and happy mapping.
dpolovinkin (2023-11-17 10:24:43+00:00): hi! thanks for contributing! noticed that a lot of houses which you added don't have a rectangular shape and they are kinda skewed - in future, when you draw a building in iD editor you can click Q after that to square it's corners, so building will have a proper shape :)
MapSpot (2021-09-10 17:10:32+00:00): Hi Wotan. Thanks for fixing those culvert issues. I think a different water area tag should be used for the canal though.

Waterway=riverbank is a tag previously used for boundaries and areas of rivers, but it was voted to be deprecated in 2011, despite JOSM still having it as a preset (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details)

It would be more appropriate to tag rivers as natural=water + water=river, as now a vast majority of the world's rivers use this system. It also allowed canal areas like this to be tagged as natural=water + water=canal for better clarity.

For more information about the global efforts to improve and modernize river tagging, there's a wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization
sbre (2024-02-03 14:27:17+00:00): Hi, is there a reason you have added a note to most objects in this area? Contacting some business before making any edits to the map is not a hurdle we should expect OSM mappers to have to go through.
Henosb (2021-09-13 22:45:43+00:00): Maxar SecureWatch 2021-09-07
Allison P (2021-09-11 04:17:26+00:00): Should not have a maxspeed on it. The key is only for legally enforced max speeds.
IgorEliezer (2021-10-19 10:51:26+00:00): Olá,
Ao juntar vários trechos de vias com mesmo nome, você quebrou a rota cicloviária Caminho do Sol: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1156017

Por favor, antes de juntar/mesclar vias, veja se elas não estão sendo usadas como rotas de bicicletas, ônibus, etc.
Att. Igor
AlexFringilla (2021-09-19 08:54:02+00:00): Здесь была хоккейная коробка, ее демонтировали уже несколько лет назад, никакого катка с тех пор тут нет, удаляю.
BJMTR (2021-09-11 05:14:52+00:00): 既然有“地铁站”这个标签，你为什么还要用“公共交通建筑”？而且还要另外再添加一个点？
SomeoneElse (2021-09-11 13:15:35+00:00): Tanks for tidying these up.  I'm about 70% of the list of revert errors currently...
Johnbo (2021-10-29 10:16:49+00:00): Hola JMG69. 

Con esta edición has transformado toda una manzana de edificios en una zona comercial que además queda identificada con los datos de la que imagino que es tu clínica de nutrición.

Esto es incorrecto e incluso genera duplicados con la anterior edición que has realizado.

Te ruego que deshagas la edición para dejarlo lo más correcto posible y que no sea catalogado como spam. Si no supieras cómo, no dudes en pedir ayuda.

Un saludo.
JMG69 (2021-10-29 18:11:42+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu comentario, no controlo mucho la herramienta, creo que ya lo he eliminado
Efectivamente está duplicado y ocupando el edificio entero
Un nsaludo
Henosb (2021-09-13 18:47:42+00:00): SecureWatch 2021-06-16
Henosb (2021-09-13 18:50:24+00:00): Maxar SecureWatch 2021-06-16
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-10 06:26:53+00:00): Atšaukiau šitą pakeitimą. Kodėl buvo ištrinti šitie ryšiai?
ovruni (2021-09-17 21:08:37+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado multiples objetos, los cuales no cumplen con el criterio de verificabilidad [0], motivo por el cual se ha revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
streckenkundler (2021-09-09 20:06:22+00:00): Hei und Oi... 

erste Bearbeitung und gleich  mit JOSM... Das erinnert mich an mich... :)

Na willkommen! :)

Im Cottbusser Bereich ist u.a. auch der User https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MaGIStokrat sehr aktiv... ich habe gute Kontakte zu ihm und er kann bei Fragen auch gut helfen...

Beachte bitte, daß du die Geodaten des Landes Brandenburg nutzen darfst!! Vergleiche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

...das betrifft eigentlich alles! Bei Fragen, kannst du mich gerne fragen... :)

Viele Grüße aus Lübben,

Sven
joost schouppe (2021-09-12 07:43:05+00:00): Niet mogelijk of niet toegelaten? De weg was reeds gemapped als niet toegankelijk voor alle motorvoertuigen.
Allroads (2021-09-11 16:10:39+00:00): Het is beter om de bankjes niet aan de belijning van de perrons te koppelen.

Het zijn losstaande elementen.
Allroads (2021-09-11 16:12:16+00:00): zo ook de vuilnisbakken.
Patr1k_P (2022-07-18 11:50:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077536097

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077536096

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077536095

tieto body je zbytocne nechavat, kedze su asi neexistujuce a nepatria k ziadnej budove
felipeeugenio (2021-09-09 21:00:51+00:00): Hola
Que nombre es Okuingttons. Así se llama la calle?
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-09-09 21:01:10+00:00): No la encuentro en internet
Gasorc (2021-09-10 12:57:31+00:00): asi se llama esa calle
alcros (2021-09-26 12:23:57+00:00): Ist die Straße am Oberberg wirklich access=private? Nur das Stück bis zur Brücke und der Rest nicht?