piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
neuhausr (2021-03-09 17:27:37+00:00): Hi, question on Lake Harriet Parkway and this is just the last changeset to touch it. If the park is just the parkway surrounding the lake, should the lake be used as an inner relation for it? This would be similar to how it's done for Bde Maka Ska, although not others like Lake Nokomis. (Noticed because the label displayed is for the park not the lake)
Brian Tang (2021-03-09 18:20:58+00:00): I am not aware of any property ownership differences between the Minneapolis lakes, so I think this decision should be driven by cartography rather than whether or not the parkway lies within a separate legal parcel from the lake. Intuitively, I think the rendering of the labels for Cedar Lake, Lake of the Isles, Bde Maka Ska, and Lake Hiawatha looks better than Lake Harriet and Lake Nokomis, so I think my vote would be to use all the lakes as inner boundaries for the park areas.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 06:59:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879177 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879177) as bank that was deleted still exists
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-19 12:42:48+00:00): Good evening JPBaje. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database? If so please mention the source in your changeset comments. Also please have a look at this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-20 15:25:03+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99597294 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99597294) as it mangled admin boundaries and routing to and from Ultimart area, Santo Cristo and San Francisco
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Nico D (2021-02-22 22:10:31+00:00): Hola! te doy la bienvenida a OpenStreetMap! Gracias por tus aportes a la comunidad :D

Queria consultarte sobre este cambio. Veo que agregaste un espacio verde junto a la biblioteca bartolome mitre. Pero revise las imagenes satelitales de google y de bing, y tambien "el autito" de google y solo veo edificaciones, no parece haber espacios verdes. 
No vivo cerca de esa zona. Es correcto este espacio verde?

yo vine a este cambio por el nombre que indicaste, ya que no se suele usar de nombre lo mismo que "la misma cosa". Ej a una plaza se la mappea con tipo "plaza" y no hace falta ponerle de nombre "Plaza", se le pone el nombre oficial. Quise buscar informacion sobre este espacio verde y no encontre.
tastrax (2021-02-20 23:05:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-19 12:39:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99594664 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99594664) as gas station that was deleted still exists
ElliottPlack (2021-03-15 03:25:24+00:00): Hello there. I see you've been continually changing this section of 83 from a motorway link to a motorway. Why are you doing this? It is classified as a link because it is an exit ramp from one interstate to another. If you noticed, one of the previous editors cited the wiki. Did you read the article? If you disagree with a tag, please reach out in a comment, don't just change it.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Note_Fixer (2021-02-19 03:19:02+00:00): Note 2530633
ParadoX_ZLWC (2021-03-07 03:59:42+00:00): 齐鲁石化的全名应该是中国石油化工股份有限公司齐鲁分公司 该处厂区我查询厂志、周边环评均未确定具体分厂名。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-03-08 01:09:49+00:00): 我是用的原来这块地方标注着的厂名画上去的，谢谢修正
DP24PH (2021-02-19 04:45:10+00:00): Notes from DP24:
1 - Alabang end restoration (near Starmall Alabang), upon review and validation, got commenced into this changeset
2 - Realtime: NB part of E2/AH26/#MetroManilaSkyway got into the momentum wherein upon resumption, concrete parts got visible from Susana Heights to after Alabang Viaduct. Likewise, the southern end of the retired (and removed) toll plaza has to be rectified as well (as opposed to the current Maxar imagery).

Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Let's always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane and dry, and you are loved.
abakus_uploader (2021-02-19 23:31:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-19 10:22:08+00:00): Hi, I think what you're trying to achieve is generally done using `sidewalk=separate`, which tells routing engines to ignore this segment of road and use the separately mapped sidewalks (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:sidewalk=separate)

`foot=no` probably has the same effect, but I think `sidewalk=separate` is the more idiomatic tag
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
Note_Fixer (2021-02-19 04:04:38+00:00): Note 2031938
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-27 09:03:57+00:00): Good day Zaculeu. I upgraded this from residential to unclassified. Please review the local usage of these two classifications. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Roads). Thank you and keep up the good work!
Zaculeu (2021-03-02 03:05:10+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract,
Thank you for catching this and providing the mapping guidelines. After further review, I agree this road would be better represented as unclassified, as its main purpose is to access the village of Naburacan. Thanks for making the update here!
Note_Fixer (2021-02-19 04:22:41+00:00): Note 1123516
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
DP24PH (2021-02-19 04:48:22+00:00): Note from DP24: This includes the prohibition of all Provincial Commuter P2P Buses from making stop-overs within Metro Manila, and it may extend the changeset boundary into Batangas City.

Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Let's always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane and dry, and you are loved.
Warin61 (2021-02-26 02:31:20+00:00): Hi,
Relation 12336738 (parking lot) is not closed. I cannot see it on imagery so cannot 'fix it'. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12336738#map=19/-33.61489/149.13792

I'd think it should be a simple closed way?
bob3bob3 (2021-02-26 03:09:28+00:00): Having trouble with the ID editor when one area (inadvertently) snaps to another. i was unable to close the parking lot so would appreciate if you might fix? The Mapillary imagery will eventually be available. (2-3 mo) Too expensive to upload the 10-20GB per day (mobile) so I do changes on a local copy same day.
Warin61 (2021-02-26 10:24:23+00:00): How should I 'close it'????? 
Note the imagery does not show any car paring here at all so I have no guide.
Warin61 (2021-02-26 10:25:34+00:00): The easiest thing for me to do is delete it. You can then re-enter the parking area.
bob3bob3 (2021-02-26 10:44:15+00:00): Well its roughly square. The N, E and S sides are there, but not the W. I'll have a further play with the editor to see if I can figure it out. It is on my action list. I was there less than a week ago.
manoj@123 (2021-02-19 05:07:06+00:00): Here I used Mapillary.
manoj@123 (2021-02-19 05:12:00+00:00): Adding destination sign information as seen from Mapillary or OpenStreetCam #MSFTOpenMaps #maproulette
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99561931
ortho_is_hot (2021-02-19 12:21:34+00:00): Hi, what street level imagery was used for this? Thanks, ortho_is_hot
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
PT-53 (2021-02-19 07:11:48+00:00): service=driveway ?
mathpras (2021-02-19 11:39:05+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for checking onto our edits. I have added the service road as we not have enough evidence to change the highway tag. thanks for your feedback. its good to see the community improvising our edits. please find the changeset(99590128) with the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:52:47+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:54:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
abakus_uploader (2021-02-19 23:31:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gileri (2021-02-19 09:25:59+00:00): Hi,

You merged two barriers here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4811843958/history

Are there both a lift_gate and a swing_gate here ?

Also, do you know what emergency=dismount means on those barriers ? (It was initially set by a previous contributor)
Jorisbo (2021-02-19 10:33:12+00:00): Hi Gileri, thank you for the feedback. the merge of two barriers was an accident i guess. I only had the intention to add access for barriers which reside on a cycle route and do not have the explicit access for bicycle set to yes. If there are two barriers, it should be reveresed. No idea what ambulances can dismount :-) Sounds nonsense to me. If you know the real situation, please change it. Kind regards Joris
gileri (2021-02-19 10:46:14+00:00): Thank you Joris for your detailed response !

It's a bit far to go check, but i don't think there are two barriers here.

I made some changes, that should be close to the reality from what I remember : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99586204

Éric
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-21 13:11:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292280977/history#map=19/50.27586/19.06788 jest drogą, nie kościołem

to poprawiłem

jak chcesz to możesz pomóc w poprawianiu takich błędów na https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/
Ancymon (2021-03-21 13:17:13+00:00): Ups, musiałem przypadkowo zaznaczyć drogę.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:27:59+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-12 12:30:31+00:00): Which mapillary images were used to create https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12336997#map=18/51.12350/16.98876&layers=N

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=GSZX8VF5Xk4OkG-B9MkBFQ&lat=51.12340771962499&lng=16.989063847917805&z=19.9 and other indicate legal left turn
Bolt005 (2021-03-15 07:34:42+00:00): Hello Mateusz Konieczny,

Thank you for letting us know. We have corrected the data and will be more vigilant going forward.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-19 12:06:26+00:00): 1. It's preferred to put `place=village` on points, as the area pf a "place" can be debatable. An outline will only be created with an available official `boundary=administrative` (often not, due to copyright). Meanwhile, an `landuse=residential` with `addr:place=` if it has address numbers assigned) will be acceptable. 
2. Please don't attach areas to roads. This makes editing difficult, and is semantically wrong.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-19 12:06:55+00:00): 1. "official" also means its border is marked on the ground.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-19 12:07:33+00:00): 1. You also duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8436866537/ by doing so
Kovoschiz (2021-02-19 12:09:26+00:00): 1. (actually a standard practice or convention, than preference)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
geo_roads (2021-02-22 21:52:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping the tunnel at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908635024/history. I don’t see it existing or being built in imagery. When is it planned to be opened?
SomeoneElse (2021-02-27 01:38:53+00:00): Halo whatyourname,
Apakah Anda yakin bahwa ada terowongan di
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908635024/history? Ini telah dihapus oleh pengguna lain sekarang.
Salam Hormat,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-10-02 10:54:00+00:00): Hi thota_shruthi. When modifying street names please make sure to do so along the whole length and not just for a single segment. Thanks and keep up the good work!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-02-19 09:43:45+00:00): Hi ☺
Your changeset contains changes both in the UK and in India. Consider splitting such changesets per country in the future.
Have a nice day ☺
BCNorwich (2021-02-19 10:07:51+00:00): Hi, Apologies entirely my fault but not intentional, my attention was called elsewhere and I forgot to upload. 

Regards Bernard.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-02-19 10:13:34+00:00): No worries at all ☺ This happens. Have a nice day! ☺
Thibault Rommel (2021-06-23 20:50:51+00:00): Ik heb van deze AED nog een foto genomen van dichtbij, is die handiger dan de huidge?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=241431984086836
philippec (2021-06-24 07:44:20+00:00): De uwe is beter.
Het is erg dat we de object tag in Mapillary kwijt zijn.
In het algemeen moet je niet bang zijn mijn mapillaries te vervangen.  Ik ben te gehaast om te taggen zodat ik niet altijd wacht tot de beste foto beschikbaar is.  Nu is dat zeker het geval nu maar 1 foto van een sequence na 1 dag beschikbaar is.
Thibault Rommel (2021-06-24 07:46:12+00:00): Ja, ze zijn daar zeker niet goed bezig. Dat je nu zelfs geen foto's zonder locatiedata meer kan uploaden en niets meer kan aanpassen achteraf is maar triestig.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
osmviborg (2021-02-19 14:57:47+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst på nogen måde at ændre på adresse- punkterne. Tak
rab (2021-02-19 20:09:04+00:00): Hello,
You have squared the district boundary.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770253481
amgusha (2021-02-28 11:26:48+00:00): Вынужден откатить вашу правку, поскольку сам неоднократно бывал в этих местах, и в курсе, что здание церкви разрушено, чему соответствует тег abandoned:building. Также, не следует дублировать теги на полигоне здания и точки, стоящей на этом здании. Линии дорог отрисованы по трекам, которые созданы, когда снега ещё не было, и их правильность очевидна на спутниковых снимках. Большая просьба, не заниматься вандализмом.
mrbaja (2021-02-28 14:44:09+00:00): С чего ты решил, что я вандал?
Ты я так понимаю идеальный и картограф, гуру всевышний.
С чего ты решил, что разрушенное здание не должно быть видно на карте? Все разрушенные здания обозначаем точками?