piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 11:57:27+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14313082 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
ssummoner1 (2022-07-02 15:16:09+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for warning me about the bug, I'll fix it as soon as I have some time.

But you can fix it too asap if you like.

Kind regards: summoner
ssummoner1 (2022-07-03 09:34:16+00:00): I have deleted.

Here it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123144329
Coirib (2022-07-01 21:42:48+00:00): I don’t believe this is a bog? At least it’s not a bog south of Cúl Aitinn
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-30 18:05:07+00:00): 挖个坟，㹧是能的，但是⿰犭茶似乎只能是用Unicode合字了，你这个感觉很难渲染，我先加一个合字符号试试看，回头注意。

（之前发生过四川彝文不能渲染只能框框的情况，后来我们选择是移除了彝文的多语言。）
还有一个是之前遇到的tracesmap上用思源黑体宋体都渲染不出来的一个越南汉字，具体情况我截屏在 https://imgur.com/a/5oSME6N 了。
（可以在 https://tracesmap.com/#8/22.3330/105.7603 切简中试试看）

----------

顺便，我永远喜欢小草神捏
NKA (2022-07-05 16:43:42+00:00): We are trying to avoid adding bus routes in Norway. The creators seldom bother to maintain them in the years ahead, and they make highway maintenance a lot more difficult.
hybridOL (2022-07-05 17:06:35+00:00): That's a pity. Moreover, there are already many bus routes defined. But never mind, there are other things I can work on. You should probably also try to get Norway our of this: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/
As otherwise people might want to add and maintain bus routes.
Comunidad OpenStreetMap Colombia (2024-08-09 19:08:35+00:00): Hola. No entiendo lo que agregaste. Que es ?
wkdgs (2022-07-05 07:55:40+00:00): Bitte lösche nicht einfach Daten, nur weil du die Info vor Ort nicht bestätigen konntest. 

Bei Baustellen, auf denen gerade ein Haus gebaut wird, gib es selten ein Schild mit der Hausnummer. Das heißt aber nicht, dass das Grundstück keine Adresse hat. Und einfach so anzunehmen, dass die Info aus einer nicht zulässigen Quelle stammt hilft auch nicht.

Hast du schon diejenigen angeschrieben, die die Adressen hinzugefügt haben und nachgefragt woher die Daten stammen? Das wäre der erste Schritt vor einer Löschung gewesen.

Außerdem macht es keinen Sinn einen leeren Punkt mit einem note=Vor Ort nicht vorhanden" in der Datenbank zu lassen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123092526
pyram (2022-07-05 21:00:16+00:00): Wenn ich Fehler oder Lizenzverstöße finde - und die Nichtexistenz OTG ist keine *Annahme* meinerseits (wie kommst Du denn darauf??) - aus welchem Grund sollte ich die nicht löschen?
Der User wurde bereits mehrfach angemahnt, reagiert aber nicht bzw. hat (gegenüber einem anderen Kollegen) lapidar gemeint, er würde halt viel in Nürnberg radeln. Als Begründung für nicht OTG vorhandene Adressen ist das aus meiner Sicht mehr als frech.
Es gibt keine legale Quelle dafür.
Die mittlerweile massenhafte Übernahme dieser Information aus dem BayernAtlas ist nachweisbar und bereits bei der Data Working Group gemeldet. Die Daten blieben wegen der leichteren Nachvollziehbarkeit noch "sichtbar".
Dass die Rückfragen Deinerseits nicht mehr leicht auffindbar sind liegt auch an dem Umstand, dass er seine Spuren verwischt indem er die Adressen meist einzeln hochläd.

(Nebenbei: Das ohne Ortskenntnis abändern von Edeka-Namen in Edeka und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:branch ist auch nicht die feine Art und IMHO falsch - siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163583387/history )

irritierte Grüße
pyram
LockOnGuy (2022-07-01 22:07:15+00:00): Hello Again kiriman,        
Thank you for mapping in Iraq lately, I know you're mapping based on aerial imagery only without local knowledge which is fine, but let me explain the situation here in the area you edited based on my local knowledge.                
These lands you converted the tag from farmland to residential in this changeset and changeset 123092907 are called "طابو زراعي", which means "farmland deed", they are not registered as "residential" in the Governmental titles, they are Farmlands officially, but after 2003, with the government who don't care or operate correctly, the farmland owners start to sell these farmlands to people for cheap without accountability, and now these people built houses illegally in these farmlands, for example, 80 houses share a 1 farmland deed with shares split between them. The government can eject them and demolish the illegal houses at any moment though.            
So let's get back to the situation on OSM, I believe it is correct to mark them as "residential" for now as they are residential houses, and on top of that, I believe we should add a 'description' saying "طابو زراعي" and a 'note' saying "Farmlands used as residential area illegally" or something in this sort.              
If you need anything or want any help in Iraq based on local knowledge, let me know.                 
Regards.
iriman (2022-07-03 12:24:18+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy,

Let me start from last and thank your kindness.

Well, one of my curiosities is about some of your edits. Some weeks ago I saw that you removed many places. Since you are local it's probably OK, but I would like to know how you really validate many places such as religious ones for bulk deletion, because it seems to me a tedious job to check every single feature and you may have an interesting way to do it. 

Another interesting thing to me, is that people add many houses or some "مضيف"s to the map of Iraq. I guess part of it comes from the great hospitality of Iraqi people (for example during Arba'een this kindness of Iraqi people is really indescribable to provide people accommodation and more) but I also would like to know your opinion on this. Do you know how local people deal with their houses being mapped on OSM?

Back to the beginning, as you probably know, Iranians may travel to Iraq a few times during a year. Considering this, my sources are different: myself, Iranian or Iraqi people, and online sources with respect to avoiding grey areas of copyright :) 

Regarding those residential areas, as you also pointed out, we are mapping the current situation in OpenStreetMap. Therefore, I map such areas as residential, and don't pay much attention to the actions that the government may do in the future. Of course adding the description=* is an option, or perhaps you can make a new tag for it if there are more of such issues, then you can record a more detailed description on the wiki.

Thanks
LockOnGuy (2022-07-03 13:24:48+00:00): Hi iriman,                    
Thank you for your interest in Iraq, and as I said if you need any help, let me know.      
I remove spam places almost daily, most of this spam is coming from maps,me users who added their names, private homes, private personal information, duplicated POI, etc... I validate each edit base on the name tag, user history, location, nearby POI, local knowledge, and many other factors.                    
About the 2 examples you gave are the same,            
for the religious stuff I deleted, some were closed permanently, some of them are only open for less than a week in a year and may never open again, some of them are in a wrong location, some of them are made up, some others are private homes which people marked as that for I don't know what reason, a blessing? or they add it maliciously above a private home of someone whom they don't like? many many endless reasons.                    
for the "مضيف" stuff, most of them, literally above of %99 of them are private homes, they added their name to the map with the word مضيف, don't confuse this with a guest house as the word "مضيف" in Iraq it stands for the location were a guy or his family receive guests to visit, and that would be in their "صالة الضيوف" which is the guest room, basically like a living room but only for guest. the %1 left is a building that is not a private home but was like built or bought only for receiving guests to visit and meet. All of these examples are spam which should not be confused with "tourism=guest_house" because there is no bed rooms, guests are not staying more than few hours, they are not paying for the accommodation, and almost all of these guests are coming from the same town/village etc..                  
Regards.
mueschel (2022-07-03 14:33:39+00:00): Hi,
these edits look a lot better now! Thanks for taking the time to learn about OSM!

One small remark though: The route relations shouldn't have a 'highway' tag.
acubens71 (2022-07-01 19:20:33+00:00): Bonsoir,

Plutôt que de supprimer des chemins qui existent, il serait plus approprié de les cartographier convenablement, c'est-à-dire d'ajouter "access=private" sur ces chemins. Cela permet d'indiquer qui ne sont pas accessibles au public.

Cdlt,
mairie71 (2022-07-02 09:04:03+00:00): Bonjour, 
il ne s'agissait ni d'une rue ni d'un chemin privée mais d'une erreur : c'est une cour intérieure . La carte IGN est claire sur ce point.
Cordialement
Mairie de Vergisson
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 11:56:14+00:00): Hi,

the relation 16374 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
OF-1 (2022-07-02 17:08:41+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis.
Fehler ist korregiert.

Grüße
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-28 23:49:31+00:00): Please don't add past features as current. Specifically the Southeast segment you added. Use OpenHistoricalMap instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123093768
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 11:55:05+00:00): Hi,

the relation 5249559 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
Ikohl (2022-07-06 18:32:57+00:00): Hello, the empty relation has been removed.
user_8101879 (2022-07-15 15:23:33+00:00): Thanks.
Best regards
5m4u9 (2022-07-02 03:51:27+00:00): Hola, revertiré este changeset porque el árbol tiene nombre propio (es el árbol más viejo del centro de la ciudad) y no es su nombre de especie :).
mariotomo (2022-07-02 12:41:35+00:00): sí, sospechaba que entre los 7, uno pudiera tener nombre proprio, pero no todos los 7 el mismo nombre.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123106021
borovac (2023-11-14 09:48:06+00:00): Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this two relations: 13298655/13298654
On this relations two missing some way for this turn restrictions.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this two turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac
borovac (2023-11-14 10:12:15+00:00): Also find this relation:13298656 where is missing "from" in turn restriction relation.
jleedev (2022-07-01 17:26:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jqngarcia (2022-07-02 06:06:31+00:00): Hola mlmesa, solo decirte que actualmente hay un esquema nuevo de relacciones de bus denominado PTV2 puedes encontrarlo en la wiki

Salud y Mapas, JQN
mlmesa (2022-07-03 04:18:40+00:00): ok gracias, lo reviso
5m4u9 (2022-07-02 03:48:38+00:00): Hola, gracias por corregir esas especies y etiquetas raras.
JJIglesias (2022-07-01 23:47:30+00:00): En esa posicion NO existe la Avenida Luis Tapia, existe la Plaza o Plazuela Luis Tapia, colocarle nombre a un segmento de la vida alrededor de la Plaza es un error. Esa via alrededor de la plaza sigue siendo la Avenida 31 de Octubre.

Antes de continuar editando erroneamente sugerimos q visites la pagina web Learnosm.org
Mapistopheles (2022-08-03 17:20:15+00:00): Hello Map-Finder, I hope this week is treating you well.
I came across a section of secondary that you recently drew in that does not appear to exist. Satellite imagery and Strava Heatmap suggest that people cannot take the road you added and they are taking the secondary road that is already there.
Can you explain why you added this way here? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075166419)
user_9221753 (2022-08-03 20:42:26+00:00): I set it as a construction
muralito (2022-07-02 01:03:55+00:00): De acuerdo. La persona referida puede ponerse en la etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology
muralito (2022-07-02 01:06:22+00:00): En vez de borrarlo, quiero aclarar, para que no se pierda el trabajo que otro hizo en la etimoloia del nombre.
julcnx (2022-07-04 05:25:26+00:00): Hi OpMen, thanks for your contributions! FYI, tracks which purpose are primarily for agricultural purposes should be kept a highway=track, while residential roads are typically found within settlements. Main links between settlements should be tagged as unclassified. All these are described in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand). If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123095893
AgusQui (2022-07-28 03:29:36+00:00): Por favor cuando se actualice un nombre de calle mantener el nombre antiguo con el tag old_name
RicoElectrico (2022-07-01 19:05:58+00:00): Hi, if you want to learn about the online editor, please use the tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_editor_walkthrough
Roman_Jarze (2022-07-02 10:23:12+00:00): Thank you!
abakus_uploader (2022-07-01 22:33:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MeisterP (2022-07-23 05:32:41+00:00): I'm wondering whether highway:pedestrian is the right street type here. Seems off since it's usually used in city centers and not around big interchanges.
Karthoo (2022-07-23 21:20:06+00:00): The streets are signed with the traffic sign DE:242 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_242_(old_number).svg), which means they are highway=pedestrian. They have been placed for Landesgartenschau 2022 and may also remain after the Landesgartenschau is over.
MeisterP (2022-07-23 21:25:01+00:00): Ahhh okay, I didn't know about Landesgartenschau. Thanks for the clarification.
BCNorwich (2022-07-02 06:30:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made some amendments to your house and removed fiction and personal details. Please stick to OSM good practice, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
user_2066394 (2022-07-01 23:09:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108944350
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460065555
Die beiden "Gebäude" sind eher schiefgegangen?
NieWnen (2022-07-04 15:19:05+00:00): Proszę, nie dodawaj nieistniejących adresów + addr:country nie dodajemy w Polsce. addr:street:sym_ul też jest raczej już zbędne i niepożądane.

Zgłosiłem (04B80) brak przez e-mapę. Urząd odpisał, że najprawdopodobniej nadadzą adres "Biskupicka 1" dla budynku kościoła.
Larmax (2022-07-07 21:23:41+00:00): Ei tuolla kyllä mitään "recreation groundseja" ole, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground?uselang=en tägi on  tarkoitettu wikin mukaan urheilupuistojen tapaisille alueille, ei kerrostalojen pihoille
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-21 19:58:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120383073/history has 1=yes key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
冰觞沐雨 (2024-04-18 00:40:47+00:00): thanks, it should be a mistake
alessandrocarmeli (2022-07-03 11:54:11+00:00): per favore, ripristina le relazioni
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-03 12:12:51+00:00): Quali?
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-03 12:26:52+00:00): Penso che è tutto bene. Accanto a Eurospar è stata costruita una nuova rotatoria. Ci sono (su OSM) due note, risolte, alle quali ho aggiunto anche una foto.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 11:53:33+00:00): Hi,

the relation 6603400 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
spiregrain (2022-07-04 09:19:15+00:00): Hi there - would you say the lift gate you added (node 9861114674) is accessible to pedestrians and bikes?  (I didn't notice a gate during my visit last week, but it looked like works were still underway).

Ken
rskedgell (2022-07-04 09:35:31+00:00): Pedestrians, yes, so it should probably be something like foot=destination. Bikes could physically get round on the pavements, but I don't think I'd want to explicitly tag access for them.
wkdgs (2022-07-07 09:19:57+00:00): Ersetze es doch durch excellent. Es sollte ja offensichtlich besser als good sein.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123098964
sjakobi (2022-07-07 11:43:35+00:00): Aber ist es wirklich so gut wie excellent oder nur geringfügig besser als good?!

Dazu kommt, dass der smoothness-Eintrag schon 9 Jahre alt war (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17158354) und die Oberfläche in der Zwischenzeit möglicherweise schlechter geworden ist.
borovac (2023-11-14 09:26:06+00:00): Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this relation: 13298645.
On this relation missing way "to" for this turn restriction.
I looking this turn restriction but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this turn restriction.

Thanks in advance Borovac
borovac (2023-11-14 09:28:33+00:00): Hi Map-Finder

Also for relation 13298646 missing "from" way.

Thanks in advance Borovac
gscholz (2022-07-13 07:23:12+00:00): Hi Gerson Angamarca,
I have reverted this changeset as it created several broken boundary relations (for example "Catamayo"). Please try again and use JOSM to avoid such errors:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123099167

Kind regards
Guido
muralito (2022-07-05 15:32:04+00:00): The soccer and tennis pitch should be in the lines, not in the walls/fences.
YPGGUUY (2022-07-04 08:49:05+00:00): 南岳坡码头
h4ic8bn3kstr (2022-07-01 21:15:12+00:00): Bing于该区域的卫星图太老旧

请检查Maxar Premium Imagery
该种卫星图较新

这些建筑物已经被拆迁
Wood32 (2022-07-01 21:41:51+00:00): 等我研究一下怎么撤销我的修改。
h4ic8bn3kstr (2022-07-01 23:28:13+00:00): 我已经处理完毕

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123101711
jo__ (2022-07-01 20:15:59+00:00): Vespucci kennt auch keine Scheunen?
zstadler (2022-10-09 17:38:38+00:00): שלום איזי,

תודה שעברת להשתמש בתגית
mtb:name
לשמות הסינגלים

אנא המנע מלהמציא שמות לפינות פיקניק

חג שמח!
SHARCRASH (2022-07-02 10:45:20+00:00): Hi!
Please, make descriptive changeset comments, not the name of the city/village or "divers" like on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122999300 We can see the location where the changeset has been done. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks for you understanding!
felipeeugenio (2022-07-02 13:57:06+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar plazas a las calles. saludos
Allison P (2024-05-05 03:13:07+00:00): addr:state=CA in Tennessee? I don't think so.
VLD157 (2024-05-06 17:23:02+00:00): Hello Allison P, 
Thank you for pointing out our mistake here- I have updated to feature to correct the tagging.
sjakobi (2022-07-01 21:54:35+00:00): Sorry. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness#Values is the right link.
sjakobi (2022-07-01 21:59:27+00:00): Sorry for the bad commit message. It should be:

typo: smoothness="very horrible" -> "very_horrible"
Benoît C MdP (2022-07-05 10:49:25+00:00): Bonjour Jothebeaver,

Je n'ai pas bien compris ta contribution. Est ce qu'il n'y a pas la place pour les cyclistes de passer en direction de la Seine, ou est ce que c'est formellement interdit ?(panneau sens interdit et absence du pannonceau "sauf vélo" + aucun marquage au sol)

Merci

Benoît
Paul Racanière (2022-07-05 11:51:28+00:00): Bonjour,
La place n’est clairement pas suffisante actuellement au vu du flux de véhicules et de la largeur mais ce n’était pas formellement interdit. 
Depuis peu la police a mis du scotch sur le « sauf vélo » donc c’est légalement interdit de rouler à contresens dans cette rue.
Je vous invite à voir avec Paris en Selle 12e (sur Twitter notamment) pour plus de détails.
Paul
user_5359 (2022-08-12 14:31:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1075217624. Why is the height of the building given in two keys? Theoretically, even the conversion into the metric system would not be necessary, since according to the Wiki entry, it is also possible to specify in feet. Please clean up the unnecessary key.
VLD157 (2022-08-12 17:05:34+00:00): Hello! Thank you for pointing this out. The height_ft tags were added by mistake and have now been removed. We will try to make sure that unnecessary tags like these are not added in the future.
user_5359 (2022-08-13 13:39:32+00:00): While trying to help clean up the redundant height_ft key, I noticed an error. 20' (height_ft) are given between 5.95 and 6.24 (height). This would only make sense if the height is the correct height and height_ft has been rounded. That would be another reason to delete the key successively. Is my analysis correct?
VLD157 (2022-08-15 15:09:07+00:00): Yes, that seems correct. Thank you for helping clean up the extra tags.
mueschel (2022-07-02 09:24:50+00:00): Hi,
please don't use the 'name' tag to specify a trees species. Use the 'species' or 'species:en' key instead.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-05 07:48:37+00:00): See DWG fix: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124509607
Michael712 (2023-09-21 07:31:00+00:00): Hallo Ichbinvonhier,

sind vor Ort wirklich drei/vier unterschiedliche Einrichtungen? Also ein Bäcker, ein Cafe, eine Eisdiele und dann nochmal ein Bäcker (Gebäudeumriss)? Aktuell ist es nämlich so eingetragen.

Siehe auch 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element
und
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/one-feature-one-osm-element-poi-in-gebaude-als-node/94594

Viele Grüße
Michael
syntex (2022-07-05 11:14:16+00:00): Jak kasujesz drogę do skrętu  w lewo to kasuj też ograniczenia. Zostawiłeś nakaz jazdy prosto i zlikwidowałeś możliwość skrętu w lewo.
starsep (2022-09-21 20:19:29+00:00): Jak rysujesz ddr, a jest już obok oznaczony cpr to zmień jego tagi: usuń tagi związane z ruchem rowerowym. W tym przypadku: bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no. Zmień highway=path na highway=footway
mueschel (2022-07-02 09:27:24+00:00): Hi,
you added many new keys here that are not used in any other place. Please make sure you only use those keys that are defined in the Wiki or are available as Presets in the common editors!

E.g.
New Drip Sprinkler
New Sprinkler
Old Sprinkler
Old sprinkler
Drip sprinkler
Drip Sprinkler
Dodko (2022-07-02 06:26:41+00:00): Vymazal som duplicitne pridanú reštauráciu, už existuje od 10/2021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7674500891/history
Trevor_1 (2023-01-22 19:18:06+00:00): Hola, por que cambiaste esto de "Motorway" a "Trunk"?