piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-05-18 20:18:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
FRichard44 (2020-08-15 07:59:28+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour vos contributions à OpenStreetMap.
Ce "revert" n'était pas nécessaire car votre changeset précédent (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59088317) était correct. 
Le wiki OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name:br indique que c'est Kerofis (base de données de l'office public de la langue bretonne) qui est la source prioritaire des noms de lieux en breton http://www.fr.brezhoneg.bzh/40-kerofis.htm donc la forme "Kerc'hfaou" est la forme correcte pour Carquefou.

Pour info: j'ai également signalé ces informations au contributeur qui avait édité avec la valeur "Kêrgefoù".
user_5359 (2018-05-19 04:27:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
user_5359 (2018-05-19 04:23:32+00:00): Hello! It is standard to use the direction of travel as the name of the road? Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60725945.
Hjart (2018-05-19 14:18:50+00:00): place=locality er ikke helt passende her når der i forvejen er tagget med natural=bay.
Jeg har i øvrigt lavet en multipolygon der omfatter hele Nissum Fjord
user_5359 (2018-08-04 14:45:43+00:00): Hallo, kurze Frage zu Deinen Bezahlungsarten vom Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1924018655/history : Ich interpretiere mal
payment:mas 	yes
payment:not 	yes
als payment:mastercard=yes und payment:note. Eine separate Aufführung von Münzen und Papiergeld ist nicht notwendig,es reicht ein payment:cash einzustellen.
Habe ich mit meinen Vermutungen recht?
UAN51 (2018-12-03 18:19:45+00:00): Never ever ever connect areas to roads. It's very frustrating when I have to update road geometry and do TIGER cleanup. Thanks.
user_6164376 (2018-12-03 19:18:31+00:00): Your frustration is pointed in the wrong direction. I do not connect areas to roads. I have cleaned up a lot of these myself. If I did do it, it was an accident, I'm sorry to cause you so much pain in life, get over it.
UAN51 (2018-12-04 08:35:23+00:00): You be careful of what you say. I checked the edit history and evidently you have been connecting neighborhoods to roads. I deleted some of them.
Somewhat related: I can't believe you screwed up the geometry I had for the ramps for the US 60/65 interchange. I have to go back, delete the ramps, and redraw them.
mueschel (2018-05-21 13:05:55+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a new tag here, "entrance:step:height". 
The simpler "step:height" is already used 500 times by 40 users. Could you think about using the same tag here?

Cheers, Jan
frosm (2018-05-21 16:14:50+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the comment.
I also use step:height on entrance to describe the step:height.
but using step:height on a node poi is imho wrong.
for ex how to describe that a restaurant has a small step at its front door but you have no information about a possible step after the entrance ?
how to describe that an office on the first floor has a small step at the front door but you have no idea of the steps or elevator located between the ground floor and the first floor?
this why I also use entrance:step:height and entrance:step_count
If you remove entrance prefix, you lost the info that it's the height for the entrance only (in case the entrance node is not already mapped of course, having a node for the entrance is of course the best)
Regards
mavl (2018-05-19 05:25:23+00:00): Hello. This changeset moves the objects without using gps-traces. For example, the object  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2528165956/history  
  
changed its real position. I'm a local contributor and I added this object using gps-coordinates.  
  
Please, read:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database  
  
This changeset is reverted.
mapaholic260 (2018-05-21 16:46:21+00:00): Hi, I was aligning this highway using OSM GPS traces. I am familiar with the Imagery Offset Database but did not use it here since OSM GPS has strong traces along this primary.
mavl (2018-05-21 16:57:50+00:00): I see. Thank you for your answer. Good mapping.
mapaholic260 (2018-05-21 23:11:20+00:00): Thanks. So should I fix it? I think my original edit matches the GPS traces better. I will also upload an imagery offset to the Imagery Offset Database.
mavl (2018-05-22 03:36:05+00:00): I don't see any problem with this road. This road has normal geometry and correct tags. If you want to move this road by 3 meters again, then I don't see any benefit. The usual gps-navigator has an accuracy of 5-10 meters. The width of this road is 7 meters. So any move by <5 meters does not add any new useful information. Any estimate of displacement <5 meters is a subjective evaluation. 
  
When I was mapping Zavodoukovsk I was using only one offset for aerial imagery for western part of this town (and another offset for eastern part of this town). All objects in each part of town have identical relative positioning. If you move this road by 3 meters, then I must move half of this town (about 50 streets and about 2000 buildings) by 3 meters also. I think that is useless employment.  
  
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions]  
  
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy]
mapaholic260 (2018-05-22 18:10:50+00:00): Makes sense. I'll refrain from aligning other roads in the area. Thanks.
Commodoortje (2018-05-19 06:37:25+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
eggie (2018-06-23 15:19:11+00:00): Dat grote edit gebied komt omdat je het pad vastgeplakt hebt aan de toponym Oirschotse Heide.
Dit was je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59091283
eggie (2018-06-23 15:22:59+00:00): Ik heb het pad losgemaakt
Lokai (2018-05-19 07:12:16+00:00): Danke für den Beitrag.

foot=yes ist bei track überflüssig, da scho mit drin
tomhukins (2020-10-09 17:14:32+00:00): I've just edited way 155062565 in changeset 92248442 - it seems odd to have this path mapped along the boundary to me and I doubt all of it is a path.  What do you think?  I suspect it should be removed.
Cebderby (2020-10-10 12:53:20+00:00): Tom,
I think you're right this is no path.  Looking at the history of that way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155062565/history
it was created as one of a pair with 155062563 (the nature reserve area to the west of Spurn Road).  Then it seems the path tag was added when real footways were added:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48706439
Curiously, the changeset comment for the subsequent:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57912073
says they are removing the path but does the exact opposite.
Also at some point, because there are 2 areas for the same thing, relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8190901/history
was added, but oddly only contains way 155062565 (and with no 'outer' role) but does mean the nature reserve gets labelled on the long thin area.
Suggest that both 155062565 and 155062563 should be kept, set as 'outer' members of relation 8190901, and can then have all their tags removed (ie drop the then-duplicative tags from 155062563 and the false path from 155062565) except perhaps a note= on each to say that they are members of a relation to avoid future confusion.  Don't know if this is easy/doable in iD, I tend to use JOSM + Potlatch and can do it there if easier.
Cebderby (Clive)
tomhukins (2020-10-13 19:26:33+00:00): Thanks, Cederby.  It sounds like you have a more thorough understanding of the situation than I do.  I use iD for simple edits, but find JOSM easier to use for things like this.  I suspect it's best for you to make these changes, if you don't mind, given that you have looked into this so carefully.
Cebderby (2020-10-13 20:09:18+00:00): Hi tomhukins, no problem - all done. Looks like it's getting rendered ok (on Standard and Humanitarian layers at larger zooms which get re-rendered promptly), with the nature reserve still showing on both areas (W of road near cafe as well as the E side main bit) and no perimeter track.  So all good I think,
Cebderby (Clive)
tomhukins (2020-10-13 21:20:05+00:00): Yes, I've just had a quick look and it seems much better now.  Thanks again :)
muralito (2018-05-19 16:58:07+00:00): Hola.

No podes ponerle cualquier valor a la etiqueta "tourism" porque queda inutilizado. Tenes que ponerle el valor que corresponda de estos https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:tourism?uselang=es
kasmar00 (2018-05-20 22:02:11+00:00): Hi, I know this is your first edit, it doesn't look good. Did something go wrong? Can you please describe what was your intention?
maraf24 (2018-05-25 08:17:05+00:00): Rondo prawie wybudowane to rondo w budowie, nie sądzisz?
user_8120638 (2018-05-25 14:26:39+00:00): Rondo już jest wybudowane wraz z całym okręgiem ronda i ruch odbywa się wokół ronda przy DW 241 i 242 w Więcborku
maraf24 (2018-05-25 17:23:43+00:00): A kto jeździ tym rondem w środku? Rowerzyści?
user_8120638 (2018-05-25 17:32:14+00:00): Tam już jest rondo z wysepkami i okrąg granitowy ronda na całym okręgu i tak właśnie odbywa się ruch  zapraszam do Więcborka
maraf24 (2018-05-25 20:17:08+00:00): Kolego, piszę o tym, co zmapowałeś, i co widać na mapie. A widać dwa ronda. Jedno żółte, drugie białe.
Andre68 (2018-05-19 07:19:51+00:00): Coastlines may not have open ends. Please learn how to use the coastline-tag before using it.
RafalR (2018-05-19 08:15:25+00:00): Tutaj są tagi których używamy w przypadku zabytków  -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:historic
RafalR (2018-05-19 08:05:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:historic
Andrea Musuruane (2018-05-22 09:04:53+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai inserito un parcheggio in via Montenavale. Sebbene nella pratica quotidiana sia usato come tale, c'è un cartello con divieto di parcheggio. Quindi non mi sembra appropriato aver creato il parcheggio. Ciao, Andrea
robertoq (2018-05-22 19:38:07+00:00): Ciao Andrea, hai ragione. Il cartello è vecchio e arrugginito ma c'è :) e io, che lavoro in officinah ho sempre parcheggiato lì senza mai farci caso. non ne capisco neanche il senso a dire il vero :)
ma lo rimuovo, ciao
FreedSky (2018-10-30 01:52:42+00:00): 一块区域不能用建筑！
speesee (2018-05-20 16:19:59+00:00): Hi Hjart, why revert?
How can you determine the exact village border by object area, based on your mentioned source (SDFE luftfoto; survey)?
Thanks speesee
Hjart (2018-05-20 16:27:13+00:00): I live not that far from this village (I travel though at least once per week) and several other mappers agree that it's a pretty good estimation.
I reverted because I've mapped this (and other) village for many years and by far prefer the area approach over single nodes.
Commodoortje (2018-05-19 06:22:27+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2018-05-19 06:36:09+00:00): De vraag of je wijziging de juiste is, heb ik doorgezet op het forum. Functioneel lijkt het me geen rotonde, mede omdat er stoplichten staan.
Omdat het een belangrijke verkeersconstructie is, weet ik niet of de routering hierdoor problemen geeft.
(evt https://translate.google.com/?hl=nl gebruiken)
Commodoortje (2018-05-19 06:36:19+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699877#p699877
dvdhoven (2018-05-19 07:32:38+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset reverted.
Het plein is een compleet doorverbonden weg geworden en daardoor zijn alle busrelaties kapot gegaan.
De wegen mogen niet doorverbonden worden omdat de busrelaties moeten kunnen afslaan. Dat kan niet bij een doorverbonden weg.
En ik vind het niet zinvol om nu alle busrelaties met de hand te gaan herstellen en alle wegen weer door te knippen.
Verder is ID een relatiemoordernaar en je moet dus niet met ID wegen gaan wijzigen die vol liggen met relaties.
Sowieso moet je nooit, nooit, nooit, nooit wegen over relaties doorverbinden.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
DavidKewley (2018-05-20 19:11:38+00:00): Hi chouvincent, in this changeset and two subsequent changesets, you marked this building and two other buildings nearby as three separate parks. I see no reason to believe that these former building outlines meet the definition of "park" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark, so I reversed these changes of yours in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59130951.

When you edit OSM, please try to tag objects accurately, and if these really are parks, please reply here so we can discuss. Thanks, David
DavidKewley (2018-05-20 19:40:23+00:00): Hi chouvincent, I'm not sure what you were attempting to do in this changeset, but you marked an entire hospital grounds as a bus stop, removed the hospital tags, and removed the hospital name. This is clearly wrong, so I have reversed these edits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59131069. - David
Alexey87 (2018-06-25 19:56:37+00:00): Предлагаю отменить правку. См. обсуждение: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54361096
fserges (2018-06-26 12:58:46+00:00): Не готов вступать в полемику по поводу ситуации с Ширково/Наумово так как работаю с официальными документами типа генплана/ПЗЗ, устава поселения и т.п., а не с местными жителями.

Неоднократно сталкивался с тем, что местные называют объекты иначе, чем отмечено на карте/документах. Для таких ситуаций существует тег loc_name который как раз хранит то название, которые используется местными.

Поэтому в качестве достоверного источника информации лучше использовать то, как именуется НП в документах типа штампа в паспорте (прописка, только свежая а не 50 лет назад) или праве собственности на земельный участок.

Вам виднее, что это - loc_name или name, а на картах ошибка. Поскольку на других картах отмечается именно так, то вместо комментария к правке стоит к тегам НП добавить какой-то уточняющий текст типа note="Название такое-то потому что". Иначе название НП будет меняться на официальные снова и снова.
Maperouse (2018-07-02 21:52:34+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Please make sure to only map what is correct and on the ground. I have fixed this street name back to the original name. Here is more information on how to map: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
user_5359 (2018-05-19 04:16:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
user_5359 (2018-05-19 04:15:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question: Why did you delete the highway tag from the Riverview Road?
edc250 (2018-05-26 23:15:00+00:00): Did not mean to delete the highway tag.  I was trying to edit the length of Riverview Rd.  Previously the map was showing the road going past where the road ends.  It is correct now.  Thanks.
user_5359 (2018-05-19 04:09:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415139845. I suggest you attach the information there. If you need help: You are welcome.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-21 13:41:02+00:00): Fabiano, percebi que ao editar as vias, você está deixando elas desconectadas,sendo que antes elas estavam conectadas e é importante que você preste atenção a isso.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-21 13:57:17+00:00): Já corrigi, mas por favor, não deixe as vias desconectadas mais.
FABIANO FERREIRA (2018-05-21 15:57:28+00:00): Tranquilo, vou verificar das próximas vezes o que ocorreu, pois, quando aparecia erro via deconectada eu estava corrigindo...
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-21 15:59:47+00:00): Na verdade esse erro só aparece quando nenhuma ponta da via se conecta a outra, no caso uma das pontas se conectava, mas o resto não. Ou então deixar uma via cruzando sobre a outra, quando se devia conectar, exceto quando é ponte, tunel, etc.
FABIANO FERREIRA (2018-05-21 16:14:57+00:00): Então tá explicado, terei mais atenção nas próximas atualizações e revisarei as outras que já fiz...
canfe (2020-02-26 16:11:06+00:00): Carissimo,
sono appassionato di piloni votivi e stavo mettendo un po' d'ordine in Piemonte.
Ho notato che hai dato il nome ad alcuni piloni (sono piccolissimi dalle immagini aeree) come "cappelle".
Il nome è davvero quello di cappella?
O sono, come credo, piloni?
Per essere cappelle bisognerebbe poterci almeno entrare dentro.
danbag (2020-02-27 06:16:09+00:00): Grazie della precisazione, mi aiuterà a mappare meglio. Nel normale parlare della nostra zona  "Cappella" è una costruzione con tetto sempre in piode con piccolo altare dove porre fiori o grazie ricevute. Spesso con un cancelletto in legno o in ferro ed una piccola zona interna calpestabile, così sono la Cappella di Erfo e la Cappella Roccolo, per cui ritengo siano "Cappelle".
Altre volte la tipologia è simile ma non esiste zona calpestabile, questa seconda ti chiedo è un "Pilone" ? Se si debbo modificarne alcune....
Ciao
Danilo
PS se mi dai una mail ti mando delle foto.
La mia è danbag@libero.it
canfe (2020-03-03 11:20:30+00:00): Sì la distinzione è corretta.
Per essere cappella, e quindi luogo di culto, ci vuole un altare per il Santissimo Sacramento.
Se non ci entri dentro, ma al maessimo ci lasci un lumino è pilone votivo.
manda tutto a cantone.ferruccio@gmail.com
user_5359 (2018-05-20 06:46:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-08 16:13:52+00:00): no existe
muralito (2018-05-19 16:21:07+00:00): Por favor, não amarre os polígonos de uso da terra às estradas
Maicom (2018-05-19 19:01:40+00:00): Obrigado pelo toque @muralito, eu sempre tive dúvida quanto a isso, sabes me dizer se tem como eu remover as alterações que contém estes nós. abraço
muralito (2018-05-22 00:14:05+00:00): Editor JOSM tem o comando "unglue ways".
Não sei em iD. Por favor, pergunte no forum do brasil.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org
/viewforum.php?id=74
user_677497 (2018-05-19 08:51:17+00:00): Cześć, jeśli uwzględniasz TYMCZASOWE ZMIANY związane z remontami/budową ulic na mapie to wprowadź tak jak jest faktycznie! Mianowice przez przez budowane rondo Wyszyńskiego/Prosta obecny przejazd wygląda inaczej niż zaznaczyłeś na OSM - jadąc od wschodu ul. Wyszyńskiego na wysokości ul. Kiepury trzeba zjechać na południową jezdnię ul. Wyszyńskiego (objazd jest nieco bardziej w prawo położony o innym nachyleniu linii-łącznika), przejeżdża się przez południowy łuk/fragment nowego ronda i dalej jest już OK. Nie można już wjechać ul. Prostą i Infułacką, barierki są ustawione przy wyjeździe z parkingu Kaufland, dojazd tylko dla mieszkańców bloku i domów, a Infułacka od Wyszyńskiego do Wesołej też jest w przebudowie i niedostępna do przejazdu (tymczasowy wjazd od ul. Zamoyskiego)! Oczywiście jak uważasz, to tylko drobna uwaga...
user_5359 (2018-05-19 16:25:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
eisa01 (2024-03-17 15:23:24+00:00): Er det best å slette Versto i Morgedal?

Fins ikke lenger, brant ned og var aldri en camping plass: https://www.vtb.no/nyheiter/%C2%96-vemodig/
NKA (2024-03-17 19:20:55+00:00): Det var nok en camping der, men om den er borte, så synes jeg du skal fjerne noden.
Commodoortje (2018-05-20 05:03:03+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
korni (2018-06-08 20:10:36+00:00): To nie droga jest w budowie (przetarg został niedawno unieważniony), tylko inwestycja deweloperska
Ninjoh (2018-10-02 14:14:42+00:00): Stroet, ik zie dat u beiden locaties van het Liemerscollege in Zevenaar als amenity=college heeft getagd, maar zou dit niet amenity=school moeten zijn?
Het Liemerscollege is voortgezet onderwijs, en volgens de wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_school) is Nederlands voorgezet onderwijs *secondary education*.
Volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=college is amenity=college bedoeld voor post-secondary education, en zou amenity=school gebruikt moeten worden voor *secondary education*
user_5359 (2018-05-20 06:45:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Константин Гам (2019-08-16 22:33:20+00:00): Убедительная просьба, при раздваивании улицы на 2 way - внимательно относиться к тегам, на одной стороне есть lit и surface. а на другой нет... Это негативно влияет на маршрутизацию
Dinamik (2019-08-19 15:45:45+00:00): Здравствуйте! Насколько я могу судить, в данном случае раздваивание было осуществлено в правках  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55349930 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55351228 . В обсуждаемом пакете правок, помнится, корректировались сегменты для обеспечения связности отношений маршрутов общественного транспорта.
kreuzschnabel (2020-03-21 09:04:12+00:00): Haloo KlausB, ist schon etwas her, aber du hast hier eine Reihe Häuser um 7 Meter verschoben, offenbar nach Bing-Luftbild. 
Bitte sei damit vorsichtig. Das neue Bing-Luftbild ist nicht besonders lagegenau (im Gegensatz zum alten von 2010, das sehr präzise war) und muss unbedingt vor dem Abzeichnen lagekorrigiert werden.
enezeg (2024-09-27 16:12:13+00:00): Bonjour,
ces panneaux existe t il toujours ? si oui, vous pourriez préciser le type d'objet comme cela a été fait pour le panneau d'information près de l'église. Ils seront plus visible. voici qqs éléments : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:information%3Dboard.
merci pour la contribution !
kaltuna (2018-07-08 05:21:25+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset hast Du dieses grüne wohnwagenähnliche "Haus" in der Nähe des Gedenksteins zum Flugzeugabsturz eingetragen. Viel weiter unten am "Schwarzen Weg" (Kreuzung mit Arbeiterweg) existiert Stand gestern ebenso ein Ding. Bist Du dir sicher, dass die Position korrekt kartiert ist ?
R0bst3r (2018-05-23 12:02:34+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Das Schlosscafe aber 3x einzutragen, als Node, am Gebäude und als Relation ist absolut unnötig, schließlich existiert es nur einmal. 
Da der Verdacht naheliegt, das hier Werbung gemacht werden soll, der Hinweis: OSM ist kein Gelbe Seiten Eintragungsort, sondern eine Datenbank für freie Geodaten. Werbung wird in der Gemeinschaft sehr ungern gesehen, nützliche Infos sind aber immer willkommen!
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59098341
seewäldler (2018-06-01 19:21:09+00:00): Hallo!
Ist die Keplerstraße immer noch gesperrt, ich hätte gedacht, dass sie zumindest einseitig schon wieder befahrbar ist?
Florimondable (2019-03-11 21:37:42+00:00): Salut, sur le bd de Courcelles ce n'est pas de l'asphalt mais des pavés (sett).
StefanB (2018-07-03 13:27:19+00:00): Hvala, gvil!

Debata o vojaškem področju poteka na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58737588

lp,
Štefan
demon_box (2018-06-06 20:56:18+00:00): Perchè hai modificato da place=suburb a place=locality??