piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-09-15 08:06:10+00:00): I would ask you to reconsider not to delete this relationship but to correct it according to local knowledge, so that in the end you get the most accurate possible boundary. By the community's assertion that the relation is incorrect, I get the impression that you actually know where the border is, if the problem was the bus route, you could have just moved the relation border to an adequate place instead of deleting it. This is why we don't have the Andes on the map and they are the largest mountain range in the world?

I think deletion should be the last option. As I created the relation, you could contact me first to see if we could fix this, not just delete the whole relation. 
Imagine if someone came along and deleted all your map entries that they don't like or don't think are accurate enough?
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 09:47:30+00:00): Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.

> I am from the Argentine community, the change was agreed upon with the Chilean community at the time and had already been eliminated. 

Would it be possible to link to where those conversations happened?

> There were lines without content, what I did was delete that. 

Maybe it's just a mistranslation, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13723952/history definitely did have content.

It's always difficult to represent very large features like this with detailed relations, ways, and nodes - perhaps a simpler "mountain range line" would have been better?
However, deleting it with a terse "no es precisa" without a link to other discussion seems a bit rude.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 09:48:12+00:00): (traducción automática)
Hola, Andy del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM aquí.

> Soy de la comunidad argentina, el cambio se acordó con la comunidad chilena en su momento y ya lo habían eliminado.

¿Sería posible enlazar donde sucedieron esas conversaciones?

> Había líneas sin contenido, lo que hice fue borrar eso.

Tal vez sea solo un error de traducción, pero https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13723952/history definitivamente tenía contenido.

Siempre es difícil representar características muy grandes como esta con relaciones, formas y nodos detallados; ¿tal vez hubiera sido mejor una "línea de cordillera" más simple?
Sin embargo, eliminarlo con un escueto "no es precisa" sin un enlace a otra discusión parece un poco grosero.
Saludos,
Andy
guillemmal (2022-09-15 10:01:51+00:00): Hola! La relación solo estaba formada por dos líneas, una del lado este y otra del lado oeste. Es demasiada impresición para tremenda longitud. Vivo en una ciudad montañosa y sin embargo lo que marcaba en Argentina no pertenecía a la cordillera sino a cordones montañosos precordilleranos. Del lado chileno igual, en muchos casos pasaba por ciudadades que no son cordillera como tal. Considero que estaría bueno que exista la relación pero bien hecha, dos líneas para toda la relación no sirve.
También hay que seguir ciertos lineamientos a la hora de armar la relación, si el segmento ya existe tiene que usarse y esta relación no lo hacía, por eso decidí borrarla.
Saludos
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 10:04:09+00:00): A bit more info - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lTh is what was deleted.  I'm surprised that there doesn't appear to be a long, linear "natural=mountain_range" feature for the "Cordillera de los Andes", but there do not seem to be any: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lTi .
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 10:04:26+00:00): Un poco más de información: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lTh es lo que se eliminó. Me sorprende que no parezca haber una característica larga y lineal "natural=mountain_range" para la "Cordillera de los Andes", pero no parece haber ninguna: https://overpass-turbo.eu/ s/1lTi.
guillemmal (2022-09-15 10:11:41+00:00): Considero que debe existir la relación, pero así como estaba planteada no le sirve a nadie. Debería mapearse en función del conocimiento de las comunidades locales, puedo aportar mi conocimiento locar desde Argentina, contactar a la comunidad chilena y plantear una wiki con porcentaje de avance por país, porque realmente es un tema demasiado complejo al menos en Argentina y Chile.
Se puede tomar como Cordillera de los Andes incluso hasta las Islas Malvinas ya que geólogos explican que en el océano la misma se sumerge y resurge en Malvinas por ejemplo.
Son muchos temas a considerar
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-09-15 10:21:52+00:00): I agree that a relation should be created with the existing geometries, but this was not done because there is no clearly defined border and it is easier to correct two lines than to correct the members of the relation, so for now, it is left to only correct the geometries. I received comments for Venezuela and Colombia, and also for Lima, and I corrected those parts, so I expected the same reaction from other communities. Honestly, I really appreciate local knowledge, but I find it unacceptable that OSM has, say, the Alps but we don't have the Andes which are greater and more massive. I'm more for cooperation first to define some geometry that is "final" and then I will easily replace part by part with existing geometries that are already on OSM
guillemmal (2022-09-15 10:27:04+00:00): Bueno, está la geometría que pasaron en Overpass, si puedes volvé a subirla y yo aviso a las comunidades de Argentina y Chile que la idea es mejorarla con el tiempo, así nadie comete algún error como el mío de borrarla.
Me comprometo a que las comunidades queden avisadas
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-09-15 10:40:21+00:00): Thanks guillemmal, I really appreciate this solution, looking forward to improve the geometry and relation members in the future.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 14:54:16+00:00): Regardless of whether the "Andes" region should exist or not I'd have thought a "natural=mountain_range" feature is probably better at describing what it is, as a linear feature as noted at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dmountain_range .
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-09-15 15:03:33+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, 
I agree that the OSM wiki states that this tag should not be used on polygons or relations, but this range is so huge, so it covers a lot of mountain peaks and it would be impossible to map it, it would still be a bad geometry, and also, other big mountain ranges are already mapped with polygon relations, so this is why this approach is taken.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 15:15:47+00:00): The point of a natural=mountain_range tag is that it's a rough idea of the location only - precisely because there is no exact extent!  There is no area that you can draw with everything inside "part of the Andes" and everything outside "not part of the Andes".
guillemmal (2022-09-15 16:48:50+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo con utilizar el tag natural=mountain_range!
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-09-16 11:03:48+00:00): I will then create a line instead of this relation if this is OK with the communities.
Carto_Graph (2022-09-10 11:40:59+00:00): building случайно убрали?
oli_earthsense (2023-09-25 10:15:21+00:00): Should this segment be secondary? Could not find a source showing that the B323 has been extended
Falsernet (2023-09-27 01:19:52+00:00): Maybe, maybe not. I don't remember back a year, maybe I made a bad decision.

OS's classification looks odd. If there's current official documentation or physical signage stating what road class or number this is then I'd side with that.
user_5359 (2022-09-10 12:21:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/678935935 (one of four objects). What is the source of the image mentioned in the tag https://photos.app.goo.gl/frMQjZZcvFBVbn9v9 = https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/wM42v9HXr7rH4G3MVSl0AA
?
Harry Wood (2022-09-18 20:11:10+00:00): How intriguing! Were you able to walk around those footpath bits?
philiprowlands (2022-11-08 22:48:30+00:00): No, just went with one of the detailed satellite backgrounds from the iD editor.
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 17:04:58+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126023382
user_5359 (2022-09-15 15:24:59+00:00): Hello! Please check the correction of the way https://www.osm.org/way/620864832/history .
elevationhunter (2022-09-11 21:16:14+00:00): O aký redesing ide? Bolo by fajn do mapovej vrstvy na freemap (openstreet mape) doplniť aj cesty podľa podkladu máp lesných ciest (NLC SK) v lokalite Krivošťanka, a okolitých obciach ako Jasenov, Staré, Oreské..
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:58:10+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126023159
watmildon (2022-09-16 21:33:06+00:00): It would be interesting to know if/when the trail nearby gets a name update.
JstnMcBrd (2022-09-16 21:37:23+00:00): I considered renaming it, but I wasn't sure if there was trail signage or anything that needed to be changed first. I'll let someone else make that decision.
watmildon (2022-09-17 01:33:48+00:00): Reasonable. I have left a map Note where I think the trail head is in case someone wanders through there and can take a look.
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:55:33+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126023056
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:51:01+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126022754
CloCkWeRX (2022-09-11 05:59:30+00:00): Oh, nice work :)
I don't get over that side of town too much, but if you'd like any remote mapping of buildings in the area or similar done, sing out.
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 04:13:08+00:00): 您好！欢迎您来到OSM的世界！
我们的编辑似乎产生了一些冲突。但这并不要紧，服务器已经将这个冲突予以调解。
如果您愿意，希望您在后续的贡献中尽可能详细地填写变更集注释，以便后续的编辑者可以更好地理解您的意图。
此致
敬礼！
BG2ETV 献上
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:45:13+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126022643
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-09-12 10:51:46+00:00): 尊敬的kyqhdf0451，您好！感谢您对OSM的贡献。但仅仅一个“依现状修改”并不能体现出您每个changeset的主要贡献，望您能根据编辑内容更详细的描述，再次感谢！
arichnad (2022-12-08 03:25:41+00:00): Hello SavageRainbow,

This changeset seems to put a bunch of roads and paths back to where they were in 2020.

The traffic circle you added here is now gone, and the paths you removed were recently paved, mostly in 2022.

Thank you,

arichnad
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 15:05:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154654453 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth-sourced data prior to redaction
canfe (2022-09-16 08:07:45+00:00): Gli indirizzi non vanno sui buildings ma come nodo separato posto vicino alla porta d'ingresso.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126002048
canfe (2022-09-16 08:08:39+00:00): Gli indirizzi non vanno sui buildings ma come nodo separato posto vicino alla porta d'ingresso.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126002048
Polarbear-repair (2022-09-10 10:14:06+00:00): This CS has been reverted with the reason:
DK: revert 126002261 which was the deletion of an existing driveway 
 
Please note that driveways are important for delivery and emergency purposes. 
Deletion of existing objects is considered vandalism.
Polarbear-repair (2022-09-10 10:15:47+00:00): SDFE aerial imagery clearly shows that the driveway, even with surface=grass, is being used to access the house. Vehicles are visible.
Saeed SJ (2022-09-10 06:45:03+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
لطفا برای قرار دادن نام به زبان محلی از تگ loc_name استفاده کنید. 
متشکرم
Saeed SJ (2022-09-10 06:49:59+00:00): با عرض پوزش، این کامنت برای چنجست قبلی بوده که اشتباه برای شما ثبت شد.
لطفا این کامنت را نادیده بگیرید
ممنون
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:39:42+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126022460
nevw (2022-09-10 06:36:44+00:00): Hi, I reverted this due to the dragged node in Melbourne.
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:31:37+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126022212
thepriben (2022-09-10 06:58:36+00:00): I deleted a fire hydrant by mistake in that changeset. Sorry for that. Please revert this deletion.
Supaplex030 (2022-09-10 09:13:27+00:00): No problem and thanks for your message. I have restored the fire hydrant.
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:27:19+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126022081
Carto_Graph (2022-09-10 11:43:18+00:00): "Магазин" в названии не пишется. Достаточно правильно задать категорию.
Carto_Graph (2022-09-10 11:45:43+00:00): Ещё полезно подравнивать углы (правая кнопка мыши -> прямоугольник).
Filip009 (2022-10-03 19:53:19+00:00): Keď vytvoríte reláciu pre turistickú trasu nie je potrebné dávať na každú čiaru značku colour=yellow https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093290953
Bálint (2022-09-18 10:33:34+00:00): Szia, a helyszínen járva nem láttam nyomát, hogy egyirányú lenne a Kuruc utca, mi ennek a forrása?
Balázs Hidvégi (2022-10-01 07:53:52+00:00): Szia, Budai Polgárban szerepelt. A fotót most nem tudom csatolni.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-10 12:14:28+00:00): Hi,

Please stop changing the address and phone number of your business. OpenStreetMap requires specific formats for both of those things
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:20:36+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126021876
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:15:32+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126021686
Niiepce (2022-09-18 14:39:44+00:00): Hallo,
Es sieht so aus, als hättest du hier ausversehen bei verschiedenen nodes amenity=telephone hinzugefügt. Oder war das beabsichtigt?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-10 11:03:38+00:00): Hello, why did you add oneway tag?        
   this is not a one way street, please don't assume.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126005305
s@jj@d (2022-09-10 19:20:46+00:00): I did not assume
As a rule, the path with this geometric shape is like a one-way field
Ok, I will go back to the previous state
s@jj@d (2022-09-10 19:23:07+00:00): I saw that you corrected it
thank you
LockOnGuy (2022-09-10 19:23:56+00:00): You did assume. This is not a roundabout. This shape is applied to all of this neighborhood roads..
BG2ETV (2022-09-10 16:10:18+00:00): 该变更集不应当这样操作。希望您在后续的编辑中多加注意。我已予以回退。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126021500
NieWnen (2022-09-10 08:20:29+00:00): highway=path jest poprawnym i preferowanym tagowaniem w przypadku CPR/DDRiP.
maraf24 (2022-10-17 08:57:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286063156
To nie jest park.
maraf24 (2022-10-17 10:42:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290691223/history
Budynki się nie łączą.
eggie (2022-09-10 08:43:30+00:00): Beste uniteam.. Adressen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Die kun je beter niet gaan aanpassen, want dan verdwijnen adressen en andere komen opeens dubbel voor.
Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Bedrijven en instellingen taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnodes. 
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126005896
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 08:45:21+00:00): Waar is nu bv addr:city	Hasselt	Hasselt
addr:housenumber	63	? Hoogstraat???
FDie heb je aangepast naar 13.
Nu komt 13 denk ik 2x voor in de data en 65..  Tja..
eggie (2022-09-10 08:47:11+00:00): Hoe kan dit
addr:city	Hasselt	Hasselt
addr:housenumber	7a	4
addr:postcode	8061GG	8061HC
addr:street	Markt	Hoogstraat ?
Hoe kan Markt nu Hoogstraat worden?  en waar is Markt 7a gebleven?

Adressen blijven gewoon bestaan als een bedrijf verhuist.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 08:53:46+00:00): Maar even aan het herstellen gegaan zonder revert.
Rosedale Collections op nr 26  Maar daar is 26 toch niet? Dat is nr 12
eggie (2022-09-10 09:03:01+00:00): Wat adresnodes hersteld. 
Loop svp nog eens al die winkels na en kijk of ze op het juiste pand staan. 
Voeg de info samen met de juiste adesnode. Geen dubbelingen svp. 
Sommige bedrijven dezelfde addesnode? Bestaat dat oude bedrijf dan nog wel.
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 10:07:59+00:00): Het zal denk ik nu grotendeels weer kloppen.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-10 10:40:41+00:00): NO! this is a major highway! it is straight! you don't make it split to two with the main road and the exit!!! no! this is not just wrong but could be quit dangerous for driving!! this is a major no no! Please tell me if you did this somewhere else! so we can fix it asap!
LockOnGuy (2022-09-10 10:43:39+00:00): Just to make it clear again! this highway is straight! you shall not make it otherwise!! Please stop immediately and go check every similar error you made like this!
s@jj@d (2022-09-10 19:16:04+00:00): Hello good time
I did not make any changes in the highway and the direction and route were the same as you can see.
I only added two nodes to improve the shape of the lines
Adding two nodes ways to improve the geometrical shape of the road will not cause any problem in driving
LockOnGuy (2022-09-10 19:21:52+00:00): No, look at osmcha and see what you did! Your edit is quite dangerous too. You made the main highway split into left to continue on the highway and right to the exit, the highway is straight and by doing what you did it might make navigation maps to say for example “turn left and continue on road xxx” this is on too the fact that your edit is totally wrong too.   Please don’t do such edits again and go back and review your edits if they have the similar issues and fix them.
s@jj@d (2022-09-12 06:49:47+00:00): But according to your edit, we tested the speaker and a drive right command is generated in node21581904, which is unnecessary. While in the lower part where the path splits into two parts, to enter the street 4289299, an order to turn right is not generated.
What is your advice to solve this issue?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-12 07:25:12+00:00): Hello, I just improved the highway exit.          
You can see how I did it in:        
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=126075170            
compare it to your edit in:       
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=126006113            
Straight highways that you go 140KM/h on should always stay straight. You don't want your navigation app to say "turn slightly to the left and continue on the highway"! Some apps that use OSM data might ignore the link tagging and might consider this a split, that's why it's a critical error.
Pink Duck (2022-09-10 13:25:58+00:00): Are they really concrete asphalt though laid with hot-rolling machine? Non-road traffic is often bitmac (bitumous McAddam).
Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (2022-09-13 21:45:49+00:00): Længden på bemærkninger til et ændringssæt er til tider meget UPRATISK. Her er et link der er langt nok https://silkeborg.dk/Politik/Lokalraad-og-naerdemokrati/Tidligere-politiske-beslutninger-for-dit-lokalomraade/Politiske-beslutninger-for-dit-lokalomrade-2021
mvexel (2023-04-21 18:41:29+00:00): Hello! Did you mean to create this cafe on the south pole?
geoaustrian (2023-04-22 06:09:13+00:00): Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't mean to. Thank you for finding that. Could you correct it? I'm on holiday in Croatia.
LG Geoaustrian.
mvexel (2023-04-22 17:30:35+00:00): I'll delete it because I don't know where it should be. So I'll leave it up to you to add it again in the correct place. Enjoy your vacation!
geoaustrian (2023-04-22 17:46:47+00:00): Thx
;-)
bxl-forever (2022-09-10 13:56:30+00:00): OK, thanks for writing good changeset titles now.

We have the "dual tagging" problem now: the cycle track was drawn as an extension of the main road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41220235), and now you have drawn a separate line for it.

It should be one or the other: if you want to draw cycle tracks separately, that is fine (but it’s hard to do properly, especially at intersections, people frequently forget some connections and it can seriously damage cycle routing) but in that case you should remove the cycleway tag from the main road.

Don’t worry, I know this area too and I’ll try to fix it in the next days.
user_2066394 (2022-09-10 10:31:42+00:00): Ein Link auf die Fehlerhinweise wäre ein Traum gewesen.
Antoinesk8 (2022-12-07 07:37:28+00:00): Je supprime le nœud Monoprix qui existait déjà.
sampeto (2023-07-08 15:57:12+00:00): Hallo Wikilux
Du hast bei allen Gebäuden mit dem Tag addr:place=Taubach den Tag addr:street=Taubach hinzugefügt. Das ist nicht korrekt, da die Strasse "Taubach" nicht existiert (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place). Im iD wird leider der Tag addr:place nicht angezeigt.
Darf ich dich bitten, diese doppelte Tags wieder zu entfernen.
Gruss, sampeto
MarcoR (2022-09-10 12:39:53+00:00): This changeset created a copy of 284 already existing ways outside the coastline in front of Tirrenia (Pisa); hopefully the problem has been solved by manually deleting those objects with changeset #126011360
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-20 19:35:41+00:00): Usunąłeś tag z drogi!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240096132#map=19/51.10851/16.89474&layers=N

Proszę o naprawienie  i rozwiązanie uwagi.
Ancymon (2022-09-20 19:43:10+00:00): Przypadek, już dodany znowu.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-20 21:50:16+00:00): Super, dziękuję!
MrMoehritz (2022-12-20 19:31:19+00:00): Hallo Harald, willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast review_requested angegeben: Dein edit sieht gut aus.

Viel Spaß noch!
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-10 19:29:21+00:00): Thanks!
Nordseeküstenradweg (2022-09-11 08:06:06+00:00): You're welcome.:-)
philippec (2022-09-10 14:44:55+00:00): Hooglede gemeentehuis AED is geen 2,4 meter van de muur.
Ik heb het verbeterd.
Iemand moet die AED gewist hebben, ik zou graag weten wie.
philippec (2022-09-11 11:01:59+00:00): Ik zie dat u de aed, node 8594323538 gewist hebt.
Ik veronderstel dat het een ongeluk was,  wat wel raar is voor iemand met zoveel ervaring.
Stond ze misschien op de lijn ?  En is dat de aanleiding ?
maraf24 (2022-09-10 17:13:35+00:00): Nie właścwiej było tylko usunąć highway=bus_stop z tych obiektów?
Mordechai23 (2022-09-10 20:48:24+00:00): nie, bo to były wiaty. przystanki już są
maraf24 (2022-09-10 22:04:44+00:00): To nie były wiaty, tylko obiekty z public_transport=platform.
Z tego, co się dało zaobserwować w tagach, wyglądało to jak zmapowanie dodatkowych informacji na podstawie zdjęć z Mapillary.
জাবির (2023-07-09 05:25:17+00:00): These are fileds/lands not buildings
Niiepce (2022-09-18 17:45:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de
Die Tags
bicycle=yes
foot=designated
highway=cycleway
widersprechen sich gegenseitig
Niiiepce (2022-10-09 21:26:51+00:00): Erledigt
emersonveenstra (2022-09-10 12:16:46+00:00): Hi,

Why did you delete all of these paths?
b-jazz (2022-10-11 17:02:30+00:00): In addition to deleting stuff that shouldn't be, your changeset comment of "1" is not enough for a quality change comment to inform others what you are doing. It needs to do a better job of explaining the "why" of a change.
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Pikse (2023-02-01 17:57:11+00:00): These four road segments are wihtout a name.

See the extent of Paljassaare põik here: https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00019941
MrMoehritz (2022-12-20 19:45:52+00:00): sieht ebenfalls gut aus
SomeoneElse (2022-09-11 08:52:42+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered if the deletion of Derryduff More townland here was deliberate (you can see where it was at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lMC ).  The changeset description just says "updated" so it's difficult to tell whether it shouldn't have been there in the first place or was deleted by accident.
Best Regards,
Andy
guerda (2022-09-12 11:41:16+00:00): Hi Znaika!
Ich sehe du hast die Position von mehreren zerstörten Bäumen entfernt. Das sah mir aus wie historische Informationen zum Sturm Ela.
Hatte das einen speziellen Grund, dass du das entfernt hast? Immerhin werden damit aktuell noch 513 Objekte getaggt: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tree%3Astorm%3Aname=Ela

Danke dir.