piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Arlo James Barnes (2022-05-25 17:52:46+00:00): I just meant that the diversion channel is named after Interstate 40, which it parallels. So, the name's etymology is the ref 'I-40'. If you can think of a better way to express that, change it as you will.
rskedgell (2021-08-11 05:18:16+00:00): Thanks for updating this. It can sometimes be worth mapping cycle barriers and the positions of the cycling prohibited traffic signs as well. They're not actually necessary, as highway=footway without bicycle=yes|permissive|designated should stop routers treating it as being usable for cyclists, but can be useful for other mappers.

For cycle barriers, place a node on the way tagged with barrier=cycle_barrier + bicycle=no on the footway.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier

For a statutory cycling prohibited sign, place a node on the way with traffic_sign=GB:951 + bicycle=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/3/made
suddenmoves (2021-08-11 06:49:53+00:00): I'll take a walk that way next week and make note of the locations and update it :)
jmapb (2021-09-08 12:41:51+00:00): Howdy DovePod... thanks for your mapping around Fleishmanns.

I noticed you tagged the maxweight on this bridge as "20 st". That's 20 stone, or 280 pounds, far too low a limit for a vehicular bridge. 

Similarly, the Main Street bridge you tagged as "22 st".

I'm guessing these maxweights are supposed to be tons -- can you confirm?

Thanks, J
DovePod (2021-09-08 14:41:20+00:00): Yes, this is supposed to be in tones ty for noticing.
jmapb (2021-09-08 23:53:31+00:00): Never mind -- my mistake. I checked the wiki and it says we should use "st" for "short ton" to indicate USA tons for maxweight. I've never seen that abbreviation used that way before, but it's consistent with the wiki so I guess it's correct?

Anyway, happy mapping, J

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight#United_States
felipeeugenio (2021-08-11 13:10:31+00:00): Hola. Una duda: es realmente un mall? sé que le llama "mall", pero varios de estos malls son en realidad una tienda grande que se podria clasificar como department_store (un especie de falabella o Ripley)

Sabemos de algunos que son realmente malls, pero son los menos.

por si puedes evaluar cambiar el tag. o si quieres lo hago yo, no hay problema.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109485419
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:14:26+00:00): Hey marc and welcome,

Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972106341

Looks like you connected the way with the landuse. You usually shouldn't do this.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8997142334/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8997142335/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8997142343/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8997142358/history

Just fyi, you can simply continue the existing track if it only has tags which also apply to this segment.

Happy mapping!

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:20:35+00:00): *Correction specifically on fyi: this is regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972109383
marc badukaire (2021-08-11 07:45:51+00:00): Thanks. Not sure I understand what you mean by "landuse". I connected my segment to some green segment. Is that a mark for landuse?

These are my very first edits in OSM.

The track (which I have ridden on bike) has some segment that already exist, so I made 2 segments: 1 from the main road, and 1 down to the river track.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 10:05:03+00:00): If you click on the area you can see its tags in the left sidebar/tab.

Ways/lines shouldn't be connected to Landuse/natural/areas, as there's no reason for them to be.

You can right click on each of the nodes in the editor and click the 'disconnect' option (arrows pointing away from each other.

Once they are disconnected you can choose to move the node around or delete it if there's no bend in the way there. Note, this may move either of the two new nodes. Selecting the way/line first and then moving the node may help.

Alternatively, you can leave the two new nodes on top of each other. This will prompt a "close nodes" warning in the editor. You don't have to worry too much about warnings yet, however.
marc badukaire (2021-08-11 11:10:02+00:00): OK, I see. I think I will delete these 2 lines and create a new one.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 12:14:41+00:00): If you need to combine segments with the same tags, just shift click both, right click and select the 'combine' option (cross sign).

Careful when splitting/combining segments though, some ways have route relations. You shouldn't touch these with iD as it might break them.
Once you get the hang of iD, you can switch to JOSM, which prevents issues like glueing landuse to ways.
Himké (2021-08-16 21:16:32+00:00): Waterfall is on other side of path.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:08:24+00:00): Bonjour Hernie,

Avec iD c'est facile bouger les nodes incorrectement.
Regardez, s'il vous plait.

-

This edit moves an interpolation address node incorrectly. It does not add any data on "Clinique Hernie Discale .com", nor would this data belong on this node.
The edit may have been saved by accident. Otherwise, it may be considered as vandalism.
HERNIE DISCALE (2021-08-10 23:53:22+00:00): Please erase-it for me
Thanks.
wonderb0lt (2021-08-11 10:07:19+00:00): I have reverted this changeset at your request: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109485598
Glassman (2021-08-10 23:35:27+00:00): Someone just changed the business name from Brody's to Brody's Mufflers, Brakes, and Radiators. If that isn't correct, just change the name tag. If it's not displaying it maybe that your browser just need to refresh it's cache. Easy way is to ctrl + refresh button.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109485599
MikeN (2021-08-11 10:43:24+00:00): What was incorrect about the woods that had to be removed?   They were not an import but handcrafted in the old world tradition.
rivermont (2021-08-11 12:37:18+00:00): They hardly mapped onto reality at all. They cut out large portions of other woods, covered large areas of non-woods, and were only really handcrafted along two powerline cuts.
I would leave it if someone was actively improving it but it would be hard to work with it since it was connected strangely to a bunch of residential blobs. I plan to redraw at least some of it more accurately.
MikeN (2021-08-11 14:06:41+00:00): Thanks for redrawing this!  I'm OK with deleting as part of an improvement project.   After looking at the old wood boundary, it probably did need to be drawn with more detail.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:18:37+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972109008

For "name", use the signposted name, if any, including proper capitalization.
marc badukaire (2021-08-11 07:39:35+00:00): Thanks for your comment. The road name means "road of the well / pit", should this be capitalized?
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 10:02:41+00:00): The "c" in "carretera" should be.
PT-53 (2021-08-11 10:41:22+00:00): Hallo STpheohm,
willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast für dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972104504/history
als Adresse u.a.
addr:city=Walpertshofen
eingetragen.
Da Walpershofen ein Teilort von Mietingen ist, wäre der korrekte Eintrag
addr:city=Mietingen
addr:suburb=Walpertshofen.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:addr&uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Hier gibt es noch gute Infos für OSM-Neueinsteiger:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners'_guide
https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/
http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf

Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:19:55+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972109383

For "name", use the signposted name, if any, including proper capitalization.
o_andras (2021-08-10 22:22:54+00:00): I see I screwed up the `source`... Here are the pages:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking_entrance

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housenumber

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Pawcio (2021-08-24 12:24:37+00:00): Replacing a name tag with a ref tag makes that platform number is not rendered. Please, restore the previous usefulness.
GinaroZ (2021-08-24 21:37:07+00:00): No, as that would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
What should happen is osm-carto needs to fix it so that ref is rendered instead of name, as per this issue: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3271
Pawcio (2021-08-26 14:48:25+00:00): 1) Because there is ,,Tagging for the renderer" it doesn't mean editors should ignore how data are rendered (useful), quite opposite.

2) From the wiki ,,In any case the phrase is often misunderstood. The meaning of it is closer to the following: 
    Don't deliberately enter data incorrectly for the renderer (...) A misunderstanding comes when people say that you shouldn't tag something "for the renderer" even though the tags being used are accurate and not misleading." How were you mislead by name=Platfrom 1? And examples are creating objects to render 3D or map symbols, using industrial for flowers, road tunnels for CERN. 3) Name and ref have the same function of identification of objects, so they are not misleading, but ref is more appropriate as a unique name for a wider network for example roads. And maybe there is Network Rail's Great British Platform (or Station) Database with unique reference numbers for all platforms.
PT-53 (2021-08-11 11:02:18+00:00): Hallo STpheohm,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32013949/history
von service auf track heruntergestuft. Dieser Weg ist abder die einzige Zufahrt zur Sägemühle und damit mindestens als 
highway=service.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway?uselang=de

Bitte mach Deine Änderungen bezüglich dieser Zufahrt wieder rückgängig.

Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972110783/history
hast Du einen im Bau befindlichen Weg mit
highway=construction
neu eingezeichnet. Da fehlt dann aber noch das Merkmal
construction=*
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
Um welche Art Weg handelt es sich denn?

Fragende Grüße
einzustufen.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 23:01:34+00:00): Hallo und wilkomme STpheohm,

Vielleicht ist es besser mit "playground=water" oder "playground=splash_pad" -ohne beschreibung-. Sehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
PT-53 (2021-08-11 11:08:49+00:00): Hallo  STpheohm,
Du hast an diesen beiden Feldwegen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602249522/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24622407/history
Nutzungsbeschränkungen ergänzt. 
Bitte schaue Dir im Verkehrszeichen-Tool an, welche Beschränkungen bei welchen Verkehrszeichen wie eingetragen werden:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-36
Weitergehende Access-Merkmale sind nicht erforderlich und sollten wieder gelöscht werden.

Grüße
Lee Carré (2021-08-10 23:00:04+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
SherbetS (2021-08-16 15:56:25+00:00): I manually reviewed every object that was changed to make sure that I did not incorrectly modify anything. I want to know what makes a changeset too big. In my opinion, this changeset is of a fair size, since I only edited objects in france and that is what the changeset spans. Is there a wiki page or local consensus of when a changeset becomes a problematic size?
Lee Carré (2021-09-18 23:42:17+00:00): Apologies, I had not noticed your reply until now.

To clarify, I'm not commenting on how many elements were changed, but the area of the bounding box.

Besides other countries, in my case it also spans the Channel Islands (which haven't been French territory for nearly a millennium, now).

For Channel Islanders, a recurring problem is that the changeset list is flooded with many more large-area changesets than locally-relevant ones. There's only a handful of (local) mappers for each island. This makes it difficult (even with tools to filter changesets) to keep track of local changes without being bombarded by all the large-area changesets that are entirely irrelevant to the islands.

Might I suggest grouping changes by region, rather than nationally?
LouisXIV (2026-05-07 17:36:47+00:00): Hi, I just wanted to understand why you downgraded this one to a tower? looks like a communications_tower to me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314108198
OSMmapninja (2021-11-01 21:08:51+00:00): Hi mdelatorre, thanks for mapping! I noticed here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109486687) that you changed the ref tag on Libramiento Ruta de la Independencia Bicentenario from EM A7D to MEX A7D. My research indicates that the MEX prefix is reserved for federal highway routes, whereas the abbreviation EM is used to differentiate state highways in Mexico State (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_mexicanas and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:México/Etiquetado_de_v%C3%ADas). Based on these pages, state routes can be identified by their unique highway shield. This signage indicates that both A6 and A7 are state routes and probably should be tagged as EM A6D and EM A7D: (https://www.mapillary.com/app/lat=19.389780062791&lng=-99.708504111047&z=17&pKey=485605485842159&focus=photo). Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions!
OSMmapninja (2021-11-01 21:30:21+00:00): Corrected URL: (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=19.389780062791&lng=-99.708504111047&z=17&pKey=485605485842159&focus=photo)
mdelatorre (2022-01-07 06:41:26+00:00): Hello. This highway is a federal. The road signs are MEXICO A6D and A7D. I travel on this road twice a week. Roads with the tag MEXICO are federal highways in this case a toll highway. State highways in the State of Mexico are tagged MEX in the road signs.
mdelatorre (2022-01-07 06:49:55+00:00): BTW the way the URL you sent me was not made by our OSM community in Mexico. Is was made by my friend Mapeadora which works for Kaart which is bias to their interests. 

If OSM principle is to map and tag things as the road shows, then federal highways must be tagged with the word MEXICO and State of Mexico highways with MEX. You can check a forum post I made with images of both types of shields.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71196
ruggs (2022-01-11 19:27:21+00:00): Hello mdelatorre,
OSMmapninja is no longer on the team, I can pick up the conversation. Thanks for providing the information and link to your forum post. I understand representing refs exactly as seen on signage (MEXICO for federal refs and MEX for State of Mexico), but I’m concerned the current documentation will lead to confusion and inconsistencies. In addition to the resource I sent before, the "Highways In Mexico" policy lists ref=MEX as the appropriate value for “MEXICO” signposts. (See the screenshot and description under “Destination Sign Examples”: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mexico#Highways_in_Mexico). More recently, I see you’ve been adding MEX-EM on some segments: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784589342, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29660416, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958183889. If I understand correctly from policy and your forum post, these should either be “EM” or “MEX”. I am happy to follow the best policy decided by the community, but want to be sure everyone is on the same page.

Please let me know your thoughts.
Luke
mdelatorre (2022-01-20 06:02:38+00:00): Hello Luke,

Together with user Josuer we are working to fix the mess with respect to Mexican highways. Unfortunately not every road has a road number and really often the road signs are mistaken due to a lack of standardization of state authorities that don't follow the standards in place by the federal government.
In the following weeks I will be fixing nomenclature of highways in the State of México. I have found route numbers that do not even exist. Our source will be SCT, INEGI and IMT. We have made a wikipage where all the information regarding tagging highways in México and a wikipage for each state's highway. This process will take time. In regards to highways 6-AD and 7-AD I am now sure they have state jurisdiction but unfortenely road signs are mistaken with the wrong shape and name tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Carreteras_de_Estado_de_M%C3%A9xico
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Mdelatorre
ruggs (2022-01-20 23:44:28+00:00): Hi mdelatorre, 

I appreciate your collaborative efforts to improve the ref network. I’ll stay tuned for more OSM data and Wiki updates.

Cheers,
Luke
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-11 15:51:41+00:00): Assuming this is a detached single family home, then building=detached would be the most specific tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109486760
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-11 01:24:20+00:00): JOSM swallowed my changeset comment.  Should have said: "Move historic district node over the mill ruins"
TheSwavu (2021-08-24 10:06:04+00:00): Hi,

What did you mean by the role 'part' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13077221 ? Were you trying to map https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part ?

Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-11 12:41:30+00:00): Hola. Cual es el motivo de haber borrado la Villa Nueva esperanza? no queda ahi?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109487954
Glassman (2021-08-12 17:49:53+00:00): #TIP: Include the city name with the address. No need to include the state since it's obvious which state it's in, but the post office does use nearby cities when the address is in unincorporated areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109488032
jumbanho (2021-08-11 17:59:47+00:00): Hi.  Thanks for your help in making the map better!  It's really important to get as many people as possible working to get the data as accurate as possible.

As a long time user, I wanted to point to a couple of conventions that you may not be aware of regarding your edits. 

First, you added a name to this road, which is very important.  It is recommended to write out full, unabbreviated names for roads, so "Terry Road" in this case.

Second, you changed the highway from "residential" to "primary".  The classification of roads of is a bit unusual and somewhat subjective, as it was derived from a british system, but adopted worldwide.  "primary" highways are roads that connect major cities and in the US usually are US highways.  "secondary" highways are usually state highways and tertiary are usually county roads that connect minor population centers.  Terry Road appears to be a short road that primarily has houses and farms on it so should be a "residential" or "unclassified" depending on whether it is primarily for houses or not.

Sorry for the long note and thanks again for editing!  If you want to more discussion about how to map please join the Slack page: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
pantufla (2021-08-20 10:49:18+00:00): Hola Wilmer, la producción teórica de la Antonio José es de 1000 MW según Corpoelec pero tú la cambiaste de una fuenta diferente. La cambiamos otra vez a 1000? http://www.corpoelec.gob.ve/proyectos/planta-termoel%25C3%25A9ctrica-antonio-jose-de-sucre-y-sus-obras-de-transmisi%25C3%25B3n-asociadas
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-20 12:44:31+00:00): Sí, podemos cambiarla. También deberíamos agregar esa web de Corpoelec en la etiqueta [source=]
ftcat (2021-08-11 10:27:49+00:00): Hi frozenrabi,

Just a pointer, in this part of Zambia rivers are part of the Congo Basin so will flow towards the Congo River, generally east. The rest of Zambia is in the Zambezi Basin so flow towards the Zambezi, generally south. All rivers and streams are seasonal in nature.
ftcat (2021-08-11 10:29:46+00:00): Sorry generally west not east
frozenrabi (2021-08-11 10:46:34+00:00): Hello, Sorry for the wrong flow direction. I have checked contour while assuming the flow direction. Aplogies for my mistake being the flow seasonal.
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-11 15:39:59+00:00): Seems like you upgraded several obviously primary sections to trunk...could you please not do that?  Trunk is  for expressways, primary for major undivided unlimited roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109489043
Joseph R P (2021-08-12 05:34:09+00:00): Trunk roads aren't exclusively just for expressways. Their US definition is for such, but they can be used on 4-lane, undivided roads (at least in just small sections like in this case) since traffic that is using the trunk road is forced to take these roads to continue along it. If these primary roads were standalone or much longer than what they are actually, it would be most logical to have them be primary roads, but since they are short segments that make up the expressway route, it makes most sense to tag them as expressway/trunk.
GOwin (2021-12-04 08:32:01+00:00): Thank you for adding the street names in Poblacion, Numancia. That was awesome @d00i! 

I fixed the "St." abbreviations, and spelled them out, as is conventional for feature names.
lasagna (2021-09-27 04:11:21+00:00): This is a good changeset overall, I was just surprised to see the new "Broadway Pier" node at the end of the pier.
We already have a ferry terminal mapped, which is closer to the shore just south of the Broadway Pier.
Is this new ferry terminal used for some other ferry, or has the existing terminal moved?
DressyPear4 (2021-08-11 08:47:15+00:00): Olá, building corresponde cada edificação individualmente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109490941
lasagna (2021-09-26 22:27:08+00:00): In this changeset, you deleted the newly constructed air cargo building (way 854797600). You may have been misled by out-of-date aerial imagery. Surveys and Maxar Premium Imagery all show that this building exists.
Please don't delete features without looking at multiple imagery layers and seeing if someone has added the feature recently. Features can even be added based on surveys before they appear on any public aerial imagery.
In this area, Maxar Premium Imagery is usually less than a year old, Bing aerial imagery is 2-3 years old, and Mapbox Satellite is at least 4 years old.
Szewah (2021-08-11 17:20:33+00:00): Thank you!
user_12458445 (2021-08-11 05:13:53+00:00): внесение новых данных
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-30 19:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 114415727, 114404745, 114410731, 114407543, 114413370 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting an undiscussed import in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5486 .
osmviborg (2021-08-11 06:52:53+00:00): Hvilket formål tjener dette?
Winbladh (2021-08-11 07:49:52+00:00): Det kommer fra appen - Street-Complete.
Winbladh (2021-08-11 07:52:07+00:00): Appen stiller en masse spørgsmål om ting i ens nærhed - et af spørgsmålene er Om en trappe har en "handrail" - Hvis jeg svarer nej, så bliver trappen tagget handrail=no.

Smart og hurtigt til at opdatere underliggende tags
osmviborg (2021-08-11 09:08:31+00:00): Måske burde man være lidt kritisk omkring hvad man svarer på. Der kommer mange rettelser/tilføjelser fra den app der er mildest talt underlige/overflødige.
literan (2021-08-11 15:16:15+00:00): по постановлению правительства эта федеральная трасса имеет учетный номер А-108 http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&prevDoc=102101200&backlink=1&&nd=102143013

Не знаю, что вы такое придумали за 46К-2171, я это откачу (никаких источников у вас нет)
ImIvz (2021-08-11 14:58:48+00:00): Forretninger som er "points" vises ikke altid på platforme der bruger OSM. Undgå derfor at slette forretninger hvis du ikke erstatter dem med en løsning der virker.