piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2021-08-30 09:31:36+00:00): operator=Geldmaat.
ik pas het even aan.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 21:58:16+00:00): Area and way tags should not be on the same feature
AlejandroAlba (2022-05-05 00:12:12+00:00): Indeed!
neuhausr (2021-08-30 19:14:06+00:00): Hi, it looks like you made two changes which are against the recommended tagging for golf carts:
1) removed highway=service ("In May 2019, the access tag golf_cart=* was approved to be used with highway tags instead of this tag." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=cartpath). 
2) changed the access from designated to permissive (permissive is actually...more permissive "Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission..." and designated is far more common for cart paths https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/golf_cart#values ) Hope you find this useful--happy mapping!
craigcilley (2021-08-31 01:48:03+00:00): Hi, I am kinda new to tagging and editing.  This is my forst golf course edit.  I mostly shorten streets or change streets to driveways where they are wrong.  I find these errors while out bike riding on a road bike.  How do you change the permissions so that public bike riding is not allowed on the middle of a golf course?   Sarcasm:  hi mr golfer, excuse me while I ride bike in your foursome...
neuhausr (2021-08-31 03:55:04+00:00): No problem, there are a lot of options to tagging, especially with access restrictions! One thing to remember is that we only edit the data, then routers can take that data and use it to help people navigate. So if you've been seeing people ride bikes through the golf course and they shouldn't be, you can add something specific like bicycle=no to the paths. Will that stop people from biking through? No, but it will stop people from being *routed* through if the router uses OSM data. If you use a router, you may be able to find out how often they update it, then see if your changes made a difference.
habi (2024-09-09 08:58:12+00:00): Ciao Martha
You've added several caravan_sites here.
Can you tell us about the source of these changes, especially https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9046475174, as this looks like it's only available during a festival close-by.
Greetings,
Habi
habi (2024-09-09 09:30:04+00:00): I've updated some caravan_sites in:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110429312
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156384763
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156384878
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156385156
gendy54 (2022-12-01 22:40:53+00:00): Bonsoir,
Pourquoi serait-ce une erreur?
LouisXIV (2022-12-01 23:11:35+00:00): Bonne question, je ne me souviens plus de ce que qui m'avais fait douter de ce nom, j'ai supprimé le fixme.
MitjaJez (2021-10-02 09:44:33+00:00): No. Solo una.
Opicina => Piazza Oberdan via Monte Grisa
NON È
Opicina <= Piazza Oberdan via Monte Grisa
DressyPear4 (2021-08-30 13:25:28+00:00): Olá, quando a calçada é paralela com a via, não deve ser mapeada separada
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110429826
starsep (2022-03-02 08:14:47+00:00): Czy nazwy tutaj są prawdziwe? Nie widzę ich na mapie miejskiej: ulica na tym fragmencie jest oznaczona jako Objazdowa. Proszę o jakieś źródło.
Jeżeli rzeczywiście takie nazwy zostały nadane to należy też poprawić formę (Ulica Imienia w nazwie wraz z numerem?).
starsep (2022-03-02 08:17:29+00:00): Nazwany chodnik? Proszę o jakieś źródło, wygląda podejrzanie
Brumby1 (2021-08-30 00:38:14+00:00): #sfdoanzse
Brumby1 (2021-08-30 00:39:09+00:00): #sfdoanzse
tguen (2021-08-31 07:33:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977715361 appears to be the wrong building to attach the address to.
Silaeri (2021-09-06 07:28:13+00:00): Die B75 ist nicht im Bau, es ist nur eine "Renovation".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=construction?uselang=de
smarties (2021-09-06 08:33:10+00:00): Moin, es wird gebaut wie es im https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=construction?uselang=de beschrieben wird. Es dauert 3-4 Monate ist also auch lange genug um es zu mappen. Ich mappe je nach Wichtigkeit und Dauer der Baustelle. Kurze Baustellen, kürzer als 2 Monate sollte man nur mappen wenn es wirklich wichtig ist. In diesem Fall ist es also angebracht die Straße mit construction zu kennzeichnen. Gruß smarties.
smarties (2021-09-06 08:34:43+00:00): Für Renovation gibt es kein Attribut.
Gruß smarties
Silaeri (2021-09-06 08:44:58+00:00): Naja, im OSM Wiki steht unter Construction: "...  kennzeichnen Sie Baustellen (insbesondere Straßen und Eisenbahnen) nur dann, wenn die Schließung für mindestens sechs bis neun Monate geplant ist."

September bis Anfangs November ergeben aber nur 2,5 Monate!

Es sieht einfach "blöd" aus, dass jetzt ein Stück B75 in diversen Anwendungen "einfach" fehlt.
Und jetzt kann aktuell keine Sperrung eingetragen werden in der NDR2 Verkehrskarte.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-30 13:21:35+00:00): Olá adicione apenas o que existe, dê uma olhada aqui
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/tag/pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110430849
wonderb0lt (2021-09-08 10:54:05+00:00): Hey! I see you're also active in the Shreveport area, very nice! Quick question on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977336558 - why back to building=yes? It is a retail building after all if it's a shop=*?
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:04:50+00:00): Removed this changeset and corrected mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110431322
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:05:33+00:00): Reverted mappings and  remapped them again
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110431322
nevw (2021-08-30 13:43:43+00:00): Hi marcelt
Please don’t use any Google products as a source to edit the map as this is prohibited by Google’s terms of use.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:04:30+00:00): removido
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 18:57:08+00:00): Hello!

You used
sport=canoes
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107526234/history

Have you maybe meant
sport=canoe
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Brian@Brea (2024-02-02 04:45:09+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny,
I have corrected the error in changeset 146969759. Yes, that error was a misspelling as the name is plural and the tag is not. Thanks for the heads up.
Frans S (2021-08-30 13:10:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2ss
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:54:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2ss
Frans S (2021-08-30 10:58:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
A remark on your mappings
They are very inaccurate.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:50:58+00:00): Hello Owen.
Thanks for mapping 
Please tag buildings only as building=yes.
Not other features.

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
Best regards
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:13:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
Frans S (2021-08-30 10:54:20+00:00): Hello. Thank you for mapping on this project
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:55:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2ss
rocky2109 (2021-08-30 05:58:59+00:00): Added surface tag  #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110434512
Frans S (2021-08-30 13:28:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2ss
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:14:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
DressyPear4 (2021-08-30 13:19:08+00:00): Olá, (Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no “mundo real” correspondente)?

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110434890
Frans S (2021-08-30 12:17:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
julcnx (2021-08-30 07:12:56+00:00): There is no way you can identify here the surface from satellite imagery. Please refrain from changing existing classifications with imagery alone. Please kindly revert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110435683
GrabTH_Kulyada (2021-09-13 04:13:28+00:00): Hello, 

Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I am verifying it and I will get back with an update as soon as possible. You can find the ongoing discussion by our team on the above project here in this Github ticket: <https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/49> If you have any suggestions, or corrections, please do comment on the ticket. Thank you!
user_5239402 (2021-08-30 08:21:55+00:00): 보안시설이면 지울곳이 많습니다. 청와대, 용산기지, 논산훈련소, 평택 미군기지, 수원비행장, 서울공항, 오산공군기지, 군사안보지원사령부, 수도방위사령부, 일반 군부대들 엄청 많습니다. 국정원 뿐만아니라
Raf_de (2021-09-05 16:19:11+00:00): Hello MAvanderHeide,
After looking through data in Libya we have noticed that where you have been mapping you have been using out of date imagery and this has led to you drawing ways in areas where there are none, such as on top of buildings. We've also noticed that you have uploaded data with untagged objects. Here are some examples of this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977760786/history#map=19/32.78166/12.52775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977830209/history#map=19/32.78724/12.52750
Please make sure you are careful when mapping so that we can have great data on OSM and keep it accurate.
Happy mapping!
-Raf_De
MAvanderHeide (2021-09-08 10:52:19+00:00): Hi Raf_DE,

Thanks for your comment. I just started mapping if you already noticed. Roads without tags are not easy to recognize. I will set the tag immediately when finishing my roads.

I am surprised my date imagery is outdated. I used Bing, what was required for Libya (this was stated in HOT)
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10223
Regards,
MAvanderHeide
Raf_de (2021-09-08 15:58:36+00:00): Hi MAvanderHeide,
For untagged ways you can use the validation tool in JOSM, this will show you a warning when there are untagged ways called "untagged ways". I saw the project on HOT, Bing imagery is good for mapping buildings but for mapping streets it is very out of date. Thank you for responding, and thanks for helping us keep OSM data as updated as possible. 
Happy Mapping!
-Raf_de
mueschel (2021-09-02 09:04:52+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with import of boundaries (?) All the ways only have foreign tags that shouldn't appear in the OSM database. There are no common tags necessary for boundaries on them.
Could you check that?
mueschel (2021-09-12 10:26:14+00:00): I reverted this changeset. Please follow the Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Raf_de (2021-09-05 16:18:35+00:00): Hello MAvanderHeide,
After looking through data in Libya we have noticed that where you have been mapping you have been using out of date imagery and this has led to you drawing ways in areas where there are none, such as on top of buildings. We've also noticed that you have uploaded data with untagged objects. Here are some examples of this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977760786/history#map=19/32.78166/12.52775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977830209/history#map=19/32.78724/12.52750
Please make sure you are careful when mapping so that we can have great data on OSM and keep it accurate.
Happy mapping!
-Raf_De
Raf_de (2021-09-05 16:18:18+00:00): Hello MAvanderHeide,
After looking through data in Libya we have noticed that where you have been mapping, you have been using out of date imagery and this has led to you drawing ways in areas where there are none, such as on top of buildings. We've also noticed that you have uploaded data with untagged objects. Here are some examples of this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977760786/history#map=19/32.78166/12.52775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977830209/history#map=19/32.78724/12.52750
Please make sure you are careful when mapping so that we can have great data on OSM and keep it accurate.
Happy mapping!
-Raf_De
rocky2109 (2021-08-30 05:56:23+00:00): Have split the way to remove looping error  and added surface tag #MSFTOpenMaps
mueschel (2021-09-02 09:03:31+00:00): Hi,
here's another node with those foreign tags: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9047165526
Tomas Marklund (2021-09-02 12:27:24+00:00): Yes I noticed :-(

It's corrected now

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110614712
vorpalblade (2021-09-01 01:05:14+00:00): For traffic signals on oneways, you really don't need to add `traffic_signals:direction`. (See the traffic signals at the intersection of West Aspen Avenue and South Cherry Street).

Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite".

JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
MxxCon (2021-08-31 04:59:15+00:00): Hello.
Rather than outright deleting such a node, it would be used if you utilized lifecycle namespace as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disused.
Otherwise, you can delete business-specific information and leave it just as an address node. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110439268
flother (2021-08-31 09:42:16+00:00): Hi,

I've no idea why these rocks don't appear on any of the satellite imagery, but they definitely exist. See, for example, https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/nature_and_travel/2017/05/15/incredible_location_for_a_lighthouse_perched_on_a_r/. It's a pretty spectacular setting!
syncronic (2021-09-13 08:56:37+00:00): Wenn da tatsächlich mal ein Weg war, dann bitte nicht löschen, sondern mit abandoned:highway=track taggen
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:04:23+00:00): Checked and corrected mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110440090
julcnx (2021-08-30 07:05:11+00:00): Wrong minor road classification. Please choose the appropriate classification for this and future changesets according to the official guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110440195
julcnx (2021-08-30 07:03:50+00:00): Wrong minor road classification. Please choose the appropriate classification for this and future changesets according to the official guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110440305
wolfgang8741 (2021-10-02 18:57:41+00:00): "The Vanishing Steam Age" Steam Boat "W. P. Snyder, Jr." (8713434872, v3) should remain a memorial - the boat is permanently anchored in the water just off the Museum's shore.
ottwiz (2021-10-03 09:43:08+00:00): Oh, alright, will fix it.
Werner_Wanderfreund (2025-12-27 13:49:32+00:00): Wenn der Vogellehrpfad komplett zerstört ist, wäre es dann nicht besser, den auszutragen?
Oder wurde der mitlerweile wieder renoviert?
cu0r€ (2025-12-27 18:23:27+00:00): Hallo Werner_Wanderfreund,
schaue mir das noch einmal vor Ort an (kann allerdings etwas dauern) und lösche den Eintrag, falls es keine Renovierung gab oder korrigiere falls doch. Meine Absicht bestand darin auf diese Weise auf einen traurigen Umstand aufmerksam zu machen.
Freundliche Grüße
cu0r€
cu0r€ (2025-12-28 20:43:38+00:00): Hallo Werner_Wanderfreund,
habe vom 2. Vorsitzender NABU OG Mettlach-Perl folgende Antwort auf eine Nachfrage erhalten:
"die NABU-Ortsgruppe hatte effektiv Tafeln zu dem Vogellehrpfad im Steinbachtal angelegt.
Leider überstieg der Pflegeaufwand irgendwann unsere zeitlichen/personellen Kapazitäten, da insbesondere regelmässig Tafeln durch Vandalismus beschädigt wurden.
Ich müsste in alten Protokollen recherchieren, aber aus meiner Erinnerung sind das nun mehr schon 20 Jahre, dass dies aufgegeben wurde."
Aus diesem Grunde habe ich die Bezeichnung aus der Karte entfernt!
Freundliche Grüße
cu0r€
samotay (2021-09-04 15:02:21+00:00): Fact check required
aceman444 (2022-02-05 19:56:54+00:00): Zdravim, nazov bankomatu nie je nazov jeho banky. Tie nazvy su zrejme zbytocne.
mapperue (2022-02-06 13:28:32+00:00): Zdravim, je to opravene.
aceman444 (2022-02-08 21:55:20+00:00): Dik.
whb (2024-01-04 12:34:50+00:00): Guten Tag,

die Verschiebung des Denkmals habe ich wieder rückgängig gemacht.
Siehe auch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4045710

Viele Grüße
whb
Patr1k_P (2021-08-30 09:22:08+00:00): zdravim, mozete objasnit co ste chceli zaznacit?
Bierphysik (2023-12-16 10:03:23+00:00): Hi. You tagged many ways here with "tool=yes". I think you meant "toll=yes" or what is tool=yes supposed to mean?
Bierphysik (2023-12-16 10:07:36+00:00): See: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=15&lat=46.19025&lon=9.74064&item=3150&level=1%2C2%2C3&issue_uuid=1500fa6e-3032-55ed-d005-cfcecc76764a
Bierphysik (2024-01-18 17:36:47+00:00): Ping?
Bierphysik (2024-02-10 09:46:01+00:00): Ping²???? Can you plz answer?
Bierphysik (2024-02-10 10:01:09+00:00): i reverted your tool=yes changes with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147286201
Bierphysik (2024-02-10 10:01:19+00:00): to toll=yes
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
kartonage (2021-09-16 14:40:09+00:00): Hej,

can you have a look at this changeset?
It has broken the railway tracks in this area and dragged some other nodes around. I am not quite sure what you intended to do, so I can't really fix it without a revert. Thanks

(https://osmcha.org/changesets/110444839/)

Best regards
Eiim (2021-08-30 12:55:40+00:00): Hello,

Is there a particular reason why this is mapped as a driveway rather than a generic service road? I've been here in the past year and I believe it leads only to a shed.

Thanks,
Eiim
Eiim (2021-09-04 18:04:04+00:00): Surveyed and removed driveway in 110726475.
mini-me (2021-09-04 19:32:19+00:00): Я ведь уже просил вас не использовать iD для редактирования маршрутов. Возле Меги всё порублено в мелкую лапшу и исправлять это очень тяжело...
user_12801878 (2021-08-30 13:48:17+00:00): Thank you a lot!
SomeoneElse (2021-08-30 09:21:47+00:00): Also lit roads and shops in Malton and some waterways east of Norton from OSSV
Frans S (2021-08-30 14:58:39+00:00): Hello Eurener Harris
Why are you naming all these houses with Amazon related names?
We only require the mapped buildings tagged as building=yes
Named a road as well.
vorpalblade (2021-09-01 01:00:32+00:00): Please pay attention to your warnings. Specifically, the crossing highway warning. I fixed this issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110536485 .
Axelos (2021-08-30 18:32:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous préciser la source de la modif sur le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771106366 ?

En effet, le 24 juillet l'aménagement était bien signalé par panneaux voie verte avec desseins de pictos bidirectionnel sur la route type voie verte.

S’il a des erreurs de routage, c'est juste car l'aménagement est discontinu (pourri dans le langage courant :) ).

Axel.
simon_geovelo (2021-08-31 07:34:01+00:00): Bonjour, 
Il me semble que c'est un trottoir (highway=footway + footway=sidewalk)  avec un panneau voie verte (traffic_sign=FR:C115).
J'ai juste précisé que c'était un trottoir et laissé le tag traffic_sign. 
Quels tags vous semble erroné ?

Simon
Axelos (2021-08-31 17:20:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour la réponse. Je fais référence au wiki qui indique que les voies vertes sont représentées par highway=path.

cf  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Bien cordialement, Axel.