piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-12-04 16:20:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gscholz (2019-12-08 09:54:42+00:00): Hi José,
thsi changeset has created errors in the osm database regarding overlapping ways (and even more):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.21192&lat=4.44412&zoom=17&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=77951011

Can you please fix this?

Can you please explain why this residential road is meant to be a circular secondary?

Guido
José Tapia (2019-12-09 06:21:04+00:00): Hi Guido,

Could you explain in detail, what is the action I need to do please?
gscholz (2019-12-09 20:24:07+00:00): Hi,
if you have a look at the osmi view you see the map with dark blue lines which mark the overlapping ways. Klick on one of them and then you will see a list in the right upper corner of this window, where the errors are shown and an option is given to edit the error directly in your favorite editor (ID, JOSM). Press the respective button. 
Once your editor has opened just remove the duplicate way (or the duplicte ways). Your editor normaly will also show an error if you don't fix these kind of errors before uploading.

I hope this helps.
Guido
José Tapia (2019-12-10 02:12:43+00:00): Hi Guido, I alredy did the changes, could you confirm you see them reflected please?
gscholz (2019-12-10 06:05:31+00:00): Hi,
not completely. There were three overlapping ways. I did the rest.
Guido
Lachgast (2020-09-28 12:36:28+00:00): Wvdp, bedankt voor het grootscheeps verbeteren van mijn foutief opgemaakte openingstijden! (tegenwoordig weet ik beter, maar dit is grotendeels werk van een jaar terug en langer. (p.s. ik zie het nu pas!)
wvdp (2020-09-29 06:39:38+00:00): geen probleem. als je maar belooft als je ooit iets van mij tegenkomt dat je het ook opruimt :p
trigpoint (2019-12-05 15:16:05+00:00): Hi, this edit is wrong. The road was already correctly tagged as private. Why have you changed it?
 
Tagging it as destination is wrong, that implies it can be used by anyone who wants access it, just not use it as a through route.

Please restore the correct tagging.

Cheers Phil
theArchDruid (2019-12-05 15:18:52+00:00): The correct tags have been restored. Thanks, as always, Phil. 

-theArchDruid
pangoSE (2019-12-06 07:25:35+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM. Finns det ett skäl till att du valt LM topo för att rita byggnader?
Såvitt jag vet är det inte våran bästa källa till byggnader.
pangoSE (2019-12-06 07:27:39+00:00): Jag reagerar på att du raderade 2 innergårdar i detta cs utan att beskriva varför och dem syns tydligt på ortofoto. Om inte du har nått bra skäl föreslår jag att vi rullar tillbaka dem.
Birger Canerstam (2019-12-06 07:51:19+00:00): Hejsan!
Majoriteten av dom ändringar jag gjort på byggnader är utifrån lokalkännedom då jag rör mig i områdena. Och av dom kartor som fanns som hjälpmedel så var det LM topo som överensstämde bäst. 

Kommer dubbelkolla mina ändringar under helgen för att säkerställa att de stämmer.
user_5359 (2019-12-04 19:24:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name ("Bosworth River Access sign"), have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
gscholz (2019-12-07 11:25:19+00:00): Hi Smoothdog,
several of your recent changesets have created errors in the osm database regarding unconnected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-100.13613&lat=25.41972&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Smoothdog (2020-02-20 16:53:24+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out to me.  I am sorry I did not respond on this page.  I incorrectly responded to the message.  The issue has been corrected.
user_5359 (2019-12-04 19:22:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2019-12-04 19:30:53+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist das eine Geschäft https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop, ein Büro https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:office oder ein Handwerker https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft ?
Blöde Frage: Ist dass ein Straßenverkauf oder warum ist der Knoten nicht im Gebäude mit der gleichen Hausnummer?
thopf (2019-12-04 22:25:20+00:00): Das Gebäude war falsch attributiert und daher in der Karte nicht sichtbar. Ich habe es ausgebessert; sollte nun sichtbar sein.
G1asshouse (2019-12-07 08:13:05+00:00): I have surveyed the area and found a road sign and lane markings that support the turn restriction this changeset removed. Could you please revert the changeset.
Anu_Zade (2019-12-10 00:39:59+00:00): Hello G1asshouse,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It was not my intention to remove the turn restriction here. Here is the link to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/53162660 and the Changeset 78168027. Please feel free to take a look. I appreciate your help and will make sure to avoid these situations in the future by double checking my work before uploading.
Thank you,
Anu_lyft
viloan (2019-12-04 17:17:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
VLD062 (2019-12-04 21:08:42+00:00): Hi Ismaeldiarria,

Thanks for trying out RapiD! Most of the digitized roads from your changesets look great :) However, I noticed from this and other changesets that some of the roads were left disconnected/ incomplete. When tracing highways, ensure you are zoomed in sufficiently. As a starting guide set the scale to about 20 meters, and trace the road so that your tracing has sufficient points in it to keep it on, or very close to, the road you can see in your satellite imagery. The RapiD editor also comes equipped with a validator which gives warnings about potential errors. While AI is a great assistant that starts us off with the geometry of the roads, the normal rules of OSM still apply and we encourage users to validate things like connections. Love your continued support of OSM! Let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks for your time,
Jesspher
71XRZ (2019-12-05 01:16:32+00:00): This edit left construction=secondary without highway=construction. Roads get a construction key when the value construction is assigned to the key highway.

\25/ Stellar is comparable to nearby roads such as \52/ Thornton and \25A/ Champlain. Stellar is not a minor residential street although it has been tagged as highway=residential. Connecting roads are tagged with highway=secondary, and this edit therefore makes tagging inconsistent in this area. It would be quicker to take Stellar than Champlain from SB Thornton to Thickson.

Since Bing does not yet provide a high resolution post-construction view of the area, I have not drawn parallel ways where medians are present. I will likely redraw when better imagery exists if it is yet to be done at that time.

There are some not-so-major roads such as Albert, Athol and First that are tagged with highway=secondary, tagged identically to major roads such as King and Simcoe. However, I don't want to bother changing them.
BCNorwich (2019-12-05 08:55:25+00:00): Hi, Deleting and redrawing features is not to OSM best practice as the previous history of features is lost. Far better is to amend, add or adjust what is already mapped, then all OSM history for those features is maintained.

Regards Bernard.
ToniE (2019-12-05 08:49:50+00:00): Servuse Cowboy,

Für ÖPNV haben wir ein Tool, das jede Nacht ene Analyse der Relationen macht.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de

Ich habe den neuen Kreisel mal korrekt einsortiert.

VG Toni
Cowboy79 (2019-12-05 09:29:21+00:00): Top, danke!
ToniE (2019-12-05 13:01:10+00:00): Gerne, habe die betroffenen Rad-Relationen auch noch korrigiert.
chnav (2019-12-05 06:13:01+00:00): Персональные закладки. Удалено.
Map-Peter (2019-12-05 20:51:30+00:00): Hallo IrynaGoriainova, 
willkommen bei OSM! 
Kannst du diese Fragen ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77694253 ) beantworten? 
Warum hast du den einen Hydranten ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7017696767/history ) entfernt? 
Nimmst du an einem OSM-Kurs der Hochschule Neubrandenburg teil? 
Gruß Peter
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-05 17:34:57+00:00): Bonjour Olyon,

Attention, la clé seuilːFRːDREAL ne comporte pas de caractère ':' (U+003A : COLON) mais 'ː' (U+02D0 : MODIFIER LETTER TRIANGULAR COLON). Ce problème se retrouve dans d'autres changements.

D'ailleurs, ne serait-il pas plus pertinent de la nommer threshold:FR:DREAL plutôt ?
Olyon (2019-12-05 19:06:28+00:00): Bonjour,

c'est un copier collé de cette page :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Liste_des_r%C3%A9f%C3%A9rences_nationales
Le mauvais caractère était utilisé, j'ai modifié la page du wiki.
J'ai aussi corrigé mes erreurs dans osm :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78013497

Comme dit plus haut j'ai trouvé ce tag seuil:FR:DREAL=* sur le wiki. Je suis d'accord qu'il n'est pas très bon mais en attendant qu'un meilleur soit trouvé, l'info est dans osm et sera facilement modifié. Il y a le mot "seuil" qui pose problème, il faut de l'anglais dans les clé osm. De plus, ce seuil est lié a la directive seveso europeenne donc, je pense que ces seuils ne sont pas lié à la DREAL.
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-05 19:47:50+00:00): Merci pour le nettoyage.
On a évoqué le sujet sur la liste tagging le mois dernier : https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-November/thread.html#49114
marcoSt (2021-07-17 16:48:44+00:00): Servus housy76,

Du hast bei diesen Änderungssatz die Busrelation des Busses RBA 9114 gelöscht. Ich habe sie wieder hergestellt. 

Ich weiß nicht, ob das ein Versehen war oder nicht, aber pass beim nächsten Male etwas besser auf, wenn Du was bearbeitest.

VG  Marco
PT-53 (2019-12-05 09:29:51+00:00): Hallo user567,
bitte schau Dir nochmal die Öffnungszeiten an. Diese entsprechen nicht dem OSM-Format:
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
Prüf-Tool:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Grafik zum Erstellen:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Grüße
skquinn (2019-12-04 20:22:16+00:00): Great first edit. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
viloan (2019-12-04 18:09:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carnildo (2019-12-06 08:28:42+00:00): Is this really a worthwhile thing to do?  Sure, it's typographically better, but nobody's got an en-dash on their keyboard.  Someone searching for "Croton-Harmon", for example, had better hope that the search engine understands that all short horizontal lines are equivalent.
clay_c (2019-12-06 22:11:52+00:00): Searching for "croton-harmon" and "croton harmon" with Nominatim yields the railway station and nearby details. Looks to me like the search engine recognizes it as a word boundary. It's a punctuation character according to Unicode so that's more or less what I'd expect.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-20 20:43:31+00:00): Just to confirm, this does break search.  https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Croton-Harmon#values does not find the value amended below.

OSM tries to proceed on the "principle of least surprise", and having hyphens in names where there actually is a hyphen in the name sounds like a good idea to me.
Best Regards,
Andy
clay_c (2019-12-20 21:36:27+00:00): As far as I can tell, both Amtrak and Metro-North variably use hyphens and en-dashes in the name of Croton–Harmon station (among others). The designer in me thinks the en-dash is preferable for hyphenated station names, and the grumpy software engineer in me wants to submit issue tickets to the search engine maintainers that aren't using Unicode's algorithms for word and sentence boundaries. From my perspective, the fact that this "breaks search" is a problem with the search engine itself. 

That said, I'm okay with reverting this if it's presenting an issue to enough people. It may be more practical to go back to using hyphens because they play nice with existing tools.

I've been using en-dashes so far on railway stations throughout North America, including stations not in this changeset. Should I go ahead and change all of them to hyphens?

Best,
Clay
maxerickson (2019-12-21 11:45:08+00:00): Taginfo is a tool for data inspection and it shows you what you ask for https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Croton%E2%80%93Harmon#values

It could plausibly be extended to show "extended results", perhaps just a second list called "similar results"

What I wonder is whether Amtrak has a style guide that uses en-dashes or whether they are just accidents of the sign production where someone used it out of preference. Some of the documents at https://www.amtrak.com/about-amtrak/reports-documents.html use hyphens (produced with InDesign, so not a production limitation).
SomeoneElse (2019-12-21 12:03:08+00:00): In OSM we don't generally use the "house style" of shops etc. - we use the commonly accepted name.  See for example https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=toys#values and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Pam for the former "Toys R Us" - people don't typically use some wacky backwards R emoji in the name.  If a human (as opposed to a graphic designer) would type a hyphen in a name, then a hyphen belongs in OSM.
maxerickson (2019-12-21 12:37:48+00:00): The "house style" for Toys“R”Us in text is Toys“R”Us.

Anyway, my point was that a prescriptive house style (or rather, an official dictionary of station names) is more or less the only way to argue that the official names use en-dash, because we can't trust that whoever made signs did anything other than follow their own preference.
clay_c (2019-12-21 23:09:01+00:00): reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78723287
SomeoneElse (2019-12-21 23:13:35+00:00): Thanks
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-05 21:47:01+00:00): For what it’s worth, I also use en dashes in situations where a name would properly include an en dash in running text. It doesn’t particularly matter whether the sign or the agency’s house style applies proper punctuation. Longer dashes and curly quotes are usually excluded from standard typefaces that sign shops use, but we aren’t making signs.

To the extent that OSM makes a distinction between en dashes and hyphens, renderers can display these en dashes where appropriate or perhaps replace them if the font lacks an en dash. But if OSM only uses hyphens, then there’s no way for a renderer to reliably insert en dashes even if desired, other than using Wikidata labels instead of OSM names.

Any search engine (as opposed to literal string comparisons in Overpass and taginfo) needs to perform some amount of normalization to work properly. A basic step is stripping all punctuation when indexing places and from input. Otherwise, the search engine would be fooled by searching for “Washington, DC” instead of “Washington, D.C.” (Search engines also need to perform case-folding and diacritic-folding at a minimum.)

Anyways, if you discuss this issue in the talk-us mailing list or OSMUS Slack before making the change again, these would be some of the arguments in support that could help make the change stick next time around.
viloan (2019-12-04 18:24:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:43:20+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-58.50925&lat=-3.07930&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
user_5359 (2019-12-04 19:17:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name ("Honka Lounge") have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
literan (2019-12-05 16:55:57+00:00): there is no primary traffic on this link. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Burricane (2019-12-05 21:28:21+00:00): Hi, you mention this link does not have primary traffic but its only connecting roads are primary. Can you please explain what you mean?
literan (2019-12-06 06:48:07+00:00): "highway=primary_link - съезды на развязках дорог с той же важностью в дорожной сети, что и highway=primary". Links with majority in road network as highway=primary. This link does not have such majority, it used for local traffic (from and into apartment buildings' courtyards)
Burricane (2019-12-10 18:17:06+00:00): Primary traffic going north is using this u-turn to also go south on primary traffic. Does this not qualify as a primary_link? Per the Good practice wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability "OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable. The principle applies to tags and other aspects of data representation, and essentially means another mapper should be able to come to the same place and collect the same data ("verify" the data you have entered). This principle excludes hypothetical or opinionated data like personal ratings.” These guidelines are written to ensure consistency in OSM data, and currently there are consistency issues in this area which have remained unaddressed for years: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29278559, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29278571, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193363714, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40161085, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40161082.
literan (2019-12-11 16:43:39+00:00): This link only used for such routes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=55.70293%2C37.58100%3B55.70508%2C37.57940#map=17/55.70408/37.58029. I do not think that it's the primary traffic - it's the local traffic. 

About Verifiability - yes, you may come to this place and make measures about traffic in this link, about it's strenhth and destinations. What's wrong?

About "consistency issues" - I don't understand you