piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zverik (2017-12-06 10:32:13+00:00): Hi!

In this changeset you deleted 14 route variants for H6 line, and modified other variants. With that, there are several stops that are not covered by routes. Could you please confirm that following stops are not served by any light_rail route, or restore routes that serve them:

* Timót utca https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1025430054
* Beöthy utca https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1025430724
* Egyetemi Tangazdaság https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1346196823

Thanks,
Ilya
zokert (2017-12-06 15:16:22+00:00): Hello.

The 14 H6 variant was only a temporary copy (that did not have to be touched by the original, which was disused (route)) because of a longer track lock, only the fittings to Szigetszentmárton-Szigetújfalu stopped. When the track lock was over, I deleted the temporary 14 variants and reset the original "routes".


In addition, the "Beöthy utca" and "Timót utca" served from these stops disappeared on 2017.06.17, the "Egyetemi Tangazdaság" It was closed around 2004.

This link contains your current schedule and stops: http://bkk.hu/apps/menetrend/pdf/6200/20170619_/a.pdf

Hi, Zokert
Zverik (2017-12-06 15:24:09+00:00): Thanks Zokert, I've marked these stops as closed. Now Bukharest metro and light rail are "green" again :)

http://osmz.ru/subways/hungary.html

Ilya
Zverik (2017-12-06 15:24:43+00:00): Okay, I expected that sooner or later I'll mix Budapest and Bukharest. Sorry for that :)
Karthoo (2018-03-20 20:07:31+00:00): forgot to change back from import account
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 07:43:55+00:00): Kai gatvė yra rekonstruojama/statoma, ją galima žymėti highway=contruction. Nes access=no reiškia, kad gatvė yra, tik yra ženklai, neleidžiantys pravažiuoti, o tai reiškia, kad policija, greitoj, gaisrinė ir pan. prireikus galėtų pravažiuoti.
DenisJu (2017-11-23 16:47:21+00:00): Hello Silver,
1- after your changeset, there are three tags with "tourism=hostel" inside one area! Two of them are with the same name "The Wanderers Hostel" and one with the name "Bicycle Rental"!
Are they mapped with the right information?
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4257932433#map=19/42.06790/19.51712
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5075202926#map=19/42.06794/19.51712
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323742310#map=19/42.06778/19.51718
-----
2- What's the meaning with mapping  "Rruga Gjuhadol" partly as pedestrian street?
"Rruga Gurazezve" and "Rruga e Gurakuqve" too?
Are they really evaluated as pedestrian street/zone?
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57365031#map=18/42.06805/19.51921
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372324970
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373212097
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373212095
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374065701
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373212096
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33198654
---
3- I haven't seen any "traffic panel" for the street mentoined above!!

Best Regards
Denis
user_5359 (2017-11-21 21:34:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
majid1359 (2017-11-21 20:22:17+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
4004 (2017-11-21 22:03:42+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
эта аптека уже есть на карте - виватон
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 07:52:52+00:00): sidewalk - šaligatvis - šalia gatvės :-) T.y. tik ten, kur pėsčiųjų takas eina šalia/lygiagrečiai gatvės.
Arba kitaip - sidewalk - tie keliai, kurių iš principo žemėlapyje galima nerodyti, nes jau matomas residential ar koks kitas kelias.
Žodžiu per parką einantys ar kelis šaligatvius jungiantys taškai nėra sidewalk.
ACS1986 (2017-11-22 23:20:52+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM, I'm another Preston-based mapper. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, want to discuss something to do with local mapping etc. 
Re: this edit, the name tag is really used for the proper name of an object (if it has one). The information that this is a BP petrol station is best conveyed by adding the tags amenity=fuel and brand=BP
Kind regards,
Adam
TMadisson (2017-11-23 14:41:24+00:00): Thats great, thank you for the pointer Adam. I am new to this so any co structive input is greatly welcome.
maciek-szn (2017-11-22 07:34:07+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że nanoszenie na mapę czegoś, co jest wstępną koncepcją i może nigdy nie powstać, to już przegięcie.
d3mol3k (2017-11-22 19:24:54+00:00): usunąłem
majkaz (2017-11-22 09:27:55+00:00): Again, could you explain why do you remove the address nodes?
fredi_alf (2017-11-22 11:41:29+00:00): I just removed one of two nodes duplicated nodes with the same tags.
The second node with the same tags is in the map and is added with changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/23083168.
majkaz (2017-11-22 09:25:35+00:00): Can you tell me why did you remove this address node? This edit is clearly wrong.
fredi_alf (2017-11-22 11:39:08+00:00): I just removed one of two nodes duplicated nodes with the same tags.
The second node with the same tags is in the map and is added with changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/23082290.
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 08:03:28+00:00): These are tracks to the house. They do not have any name.
Address is already tagged on the building. Address is never added to a way.
Way quality is nowhere close to being highway=service ;-)
Burgman (2017-11-22 09:16:55+00:00): O.K., no adress, but it is 
highway=service
service=driveway.
Even if there are a few parking spots on the property, it remains a driveway.
So it is written in OpenStreetMap-Wiki.
This way is made from me out of gravel! And there will be also a parking lot for the tourismus sodyba "Ant ratu" near the pond.
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 09:38:33+00:00): It's not how we tag stuff in Lithuania. Wiki is not imperative, it is just a guidance/idea.

It is not possible/logical to tag all ways to houses as driveways, because there is a lot of those where driveway comes from a forest track (and track is of lower class comparing with service).

In this particular case it is a private house in suburban area, so no requirement to tag it as service.

If this would be tagged as service, it would be very different from thousands of other private roads in Lithuania which would be confusing for users and problematic for mapmakers.
Burgman (2017-11-22 19:10:47+00:00): It is confusing for me, that this private way (55.0248, 25.0397) is highway=service and my road just a track!
May I ask you, who you are, that you cancel my changes?
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 19:28:48+00:00): The way you're pointing to is much wider and does not look like ground-based way.
Maybe "your" road is different from what can be seen on ORT10LT ortophotography?

I'm one of the persons who are using results of automated quality checks in Lithuania. It just happens that I notice you changes first. If I would leave them, somebody else would notice and do the same changes.

Sorry for that. May I ask, what is the reason for your wish for this road to be tagged as service as opposed to track? How is it different from thousands of other similar rural houses?

P.S. I'm also not convinced about the name of the house in the northern part of the parcel with a mis-spelled name "Sodyba Ant ratu", but that is not a problem for most cases (name is usually not used when creating maps).
Burgman (2017-11-22 20:27:16+00:00): The ORT10LT must be from 2015, I can see just 4 beehives (aviliai). In 2016 there have been 5. The road we have build this year in spring and the right part is already longer than seen on ORT10LT. For the parking lot it was to much rain this year...
The house near the pond will be for rent from next year on: Agroturizmas.
What is mis-spelled? Ant ratu will be the name of this sodyba.
Burgman (2017-11-22 20:31:15+00:00): ...and be the way, why the other private way (55.0248, 25.0397) is highway=service ???
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 20:38:23+00:00): Ah, it will be a tourism=chalet|guest_house? Then it changes everything. It then is a notable object, not an ordinary house.
In that case I've changed back to service/driveway. Sorry for inconvenience.

As for the name, correct spelling is „Sodyba ant ratų“.
Burgman (2017-11-22 21:07:52+00:00): O.K., sorry for my wrong lithuanic. I guessed, that the name starts with a big letter...
I'll change that.
Aš esu vokietis bet gyvenu Lietuvoje beveik 9 m. ;-)
Tomas Straupis (2017-11-22 21:29:08+00:00): We would have picked up the name after tourism=guest_house|challet was created :-)
Sėkmės!
Burgman (2017-11-22 21:43:18+00:00): Ačiu
eggie (2017-11-21 22:15:30+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-21 22:35:24+00:00): Je adreswijziging komt overeen met de gegevens van het kadaster. Wat is de reden van deze wijziging? Het gebouw ligt immers niet aan de Harm Heijeslaan. Ik draai de edit terug. Graag reactie
eggie (2017-11-21 22:37:37+00:00): reverted wegens verkeerd adres toekennen
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53986702
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Het bedoelde adres ligt heel ergens anders.
eggie (2017-11-21 22:46:02+00:00): De adreswijziging kwam dus "niet " overeen met de kadaster gegevens. Deze woning ligt aan de Doorsneeweg.
zstadler (2017-12-06 07:13:16+00:00): Hello amirgo and welcome to OSM!

In this edit you have added a few lines ("ways" in OSM terminology), but they had no tags.
.
If they represent a 4x4 route, as the name of this edit suggests, then they need to have a "highway" tag with a "track" value.
.
It also looks like someone has deleted some of your additions, probably because they had no tags.
.
Please let me know if you need help in the editing or in restoring the deleted ways.
zstadler (2021-07-11 21:54:23+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54233834
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55601540
santamariense (2018-05-30 21:42:30+00:00): Por que achou necessário excluir esta relação?
portalaventura (2018-08-01 17:54:56+00:00): Desculpa não ter respondido antes. Não tinha visto o comentário nesse changeset.

Seria como criar uma relação do tipo route para, por exemplo, agrupar as vias asfaltadas ou para agrupar as principais vias da cidade ou para agrupar vias com mão única... Não é essa a finalidade desse tipo de relação.

Se existem rotas consideradas pela prefeitura como ligações interdistritais, caberia para cada uma delas uma relação. Mas, não há informações claras sobre isso. A prefeitura apenas divulga quais são as estradas municipais.
portalaventura (2018-08-01 18:09:24+00:00): Esclarecendo o meu "não há informações claras".
O anexo citado como fonte, tem uma categoria "ligação interdistrital". Porem, não discrimina cada ligação. Seria equivalente à um mapa estadual que mostrasse todas as rodovias estaduais sem discriminá-las. A relação que exclui seria equivalente a uma relação route com todas essas rodovias estudais.
Essa mapa de ligações interdistritais, está mais para um mapa com a principais estradas municipais nos distritos.
portalaventura (2018-08-01 18:12:23+00:00): Aí, para essas vias classificadas como "ligações interdistritais", acho melhor utilizar a chave higway do que coloca-las todas dentro de uma relação route.
hrmmhahmhm (2017-12-05 12:25:12+00:00): Hej Jørgen, din GPS tracing af cykelstien langs strandvænget (way 542162318) ser lidt mærkelig ud. Har du taget højde for at støjmuren kan have påvirket dit GPS trace?
Jørgen Elgaard Larsen (2017-12-05 15:13:39+00:00): Det har du ret i.
Jeg har rettet det midlertidigt - så må jeg forbi igen og lave et ekstra GPS-spor.
Hjart (2017-12-05 16:43:24+00:00): GPS snyder nemt, så derfor er det ofte en god ide at køre 3-5 gange frem og tilbage ad en strækning. Specielt hvis der er høje træer eller bygninger
Jørgen Elgaard Larsen (2017-12-05 17:20:27+00:00): Klart. Men jeg havde ikke så meget tid den dag.

Og jeg regner alligevel med at lave nye GPS spor, når de er helt færdige med byggeriet, Et par af stierne er stadig midlertidige, og Nordhavnsvej bliver først indviet d. 17/12.
Mike Baggaley (2017-12-13 09:24:17+00:00): Hi, in this changeset way 542165565 has been tagged as amenity=bank and name=ATM. I assume ATM is not actually the name of the bank. If it is a bank with an ATM, then please add atm=yes and remove the name tag. If it is just an ATM, please remove the name tag and change the amenity tag to amenity=atm.

Thanks,
Mike
highflyer74 (2017-11-22 08:59:58+00:00): Moin willmu!

Hier ist etwas schief gegangen. Dabei wurde der Eingang des Gebäudes auf die andere Straßenseite verschoben. Ich versetze die Änderungen wieder in den Ursprungszustand. Noch ein Hinweis: wenn Du Elemente bearbeitest, die Teil der ÖPNV Infrastruktur sind, solltest Du Dich vorher eingehend mit den unterschiedlichen Tagging Methoden auseinandersetzen, da dies ein ziemlich komplexes Thema ist. Da kommt es oft vor, daß neue Mapper mit Begriffen wie "platform", "bus_stop" oder "stop_position" durcheinander kommen (geht mir nicht anders), und unabsichtlich ÖPNV Routen beschädigen (die in OSM als Relation angelegt sind).

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
datamongers (2018-02-01 18:48:26+00:00): Hello, I was just doing a survey of trailheads in OSM and came accross the two created in this changeset. It seems like they are both tagged wrong, and should either be amenity=parking, or highway=trailhead. attributes=parking is not a commonly used tag.
rsavoye (2018-02-01 19:29:41+00:00): Good catch. I changed it to amenity=parking, These two trailheads were hard to find and unmarked.
kreuzschnabel (2018-06-16 19:27:31+00:00): Hallo, bitte lies mal unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=alpine%20hut?uselang=de nach, was wir in OSM unter einer Berghütte verstehen. Ist das wirklich weit und breit die einzige Unterkunft für Wander in ansonsten lebensfeindlicher Umgebung?
GerdP (2017-11-22 08:35:52+00:00): Hi!
You used the unusual tag highway=footpath here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542163799
I assume you meant highway=path ? Besides that the way is crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153101677 without a shared node. Bing shows a different surface a that place, maybe a traffic_calming=hump or table ?
Velella (2017-11-22 09:30:49+00:00): Yes, apologies for that - it was probably getting late. Now corrected. It was a highway footpath that diverted away from the highway and then crossed a minor road. Now joined to the minor road and tagged more appropriately
Richard (2018-01-25 11:44:54+00:00): Hi - great to see all the work you've been doing on the Wales Coast Path. Unfortunately you appear to have removed massive amounts of the path from the relation in this changeset, I'm afraid, and the result is that large chunks of the path in North Wales are no longer shown. Before this edit the relation had 400 members; afterwards it had 100. Could you investigate and reinstate the missing members, please? Thank you!
Richard (2018-02-01 18:49:33+00:00): Hi - any thoughts on this?
GerdP (2018-02-01 19:41:07+00:00): The reverter plugin reports 3 conflicts,
maybe Vellela has problems to revert this?
Velella (2018-02-02 02:40:29+00:00): I have been in some of the more inaccesible parts of . New Zealand since Chritsmas and have only now returned to e-mail etc. It was certainly not my intention to delete parts of the relationship - my intention was to order it and fill in recent changes. I was doing a significant chunck of work using JOSM but abandoned that when it became clear that time was against me. I had though to abandon and delete the changes. I subsequently made some minor changes in Diamond Harbour NZ. I guess it is conceivable that previous changes were uploaded at the same time. I any, please accept my aopolgies - wholly unintended and I will give myself much more time before updating large relations like this. Thanks for reverting the changes. I will check back through my tracks on my return to the UK to ensure that all minor route changes have been retained.
GerdP (2018-02-02 07:09:53+00:00): Just to make this clear: I did not revert anything so far. I can do this:
Revert all the changes to the relation made by you since (and including) this changeset.
This will probably restore some errors as well.
@Richard: OK for you ?
Velella (2018-02-02 10:55:44+00:00): Yes, please revert. I have all the GPX tracks conserved and tagged waypoints so I can reinstate the other changes when I am next in the Uk
Richard (2018-02-02 12:53:26+00:00): That would be great. Thank you both.

Velella - don't worry about it, JOSM makes it too easy to unintentionally make big changes to relations like this. Hope you're enjoying NZ.
GerdP (2018-02-02 13:27:56+00:00): Ok, please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55995655
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55995932
Hope this helps.
Richard (2018-02-02 13:35:01+00:00): Looks great (just checked it on hiking.waymarkedtrails.org). Thank you.
Wulfmorn (2017-11-22 00:07:01+00:00): Are they really parks? They look like peoples gardens, and why do they all have the same name? Also "Gårdsmotell" has been drawn as one single large building. Remember to read the definitions of the tags. Keep going though. Practice makes perfect!
GerdP (2017-11-22 08:39:51+00:00): Hi!
I noticed this changeset because of the unusual highway=hallway which is only used here. An alternative might be highway=corridor :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-11-22 13:20:40+00:00): Changed, thx for pointing out
GerdP (2017-11-27 07:44:08+00:00): Hmm, not sure what you changed but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305486812
still has the same tags.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-11-27 12:47:29+00:00): Funny, I thought you were talking about the station of Bruges, where I used hallway as well.

It is a corridor now; promised :p
M!dgard (2017-12-25 20:55:46+00:00): "sett:pattern" ziet er geen tag uit die al gedocumenteerd staat op de wiki. Heb je die verzonnen? (Dat mag hoor.) De waarde is dan best wel in het Engels, niet in het Nederlands. "bogen" ziet er nogal Nederlands uit.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-12-25 22:36:55+00:00): Hey Midgard,

Klopt allemaal wat je zegt. Ergens in de nabije toekomst (TM) documenteer ik dit allemaal in een diary en maak ik er 'arc' van ipv 'bogen'
M!dgard (2017-12-25 23:23:58+00:00): Ideaal!
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-14 16:18:54+00:00): Eindelijk eens tijd gevonden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pieter%20Vander%20Vennet/diary
abdeldjalil (2017-11-22 21:06:18+00:00): j'ai créé précédemment une relation ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7596272
Algebre gama (2017-11-23 09:29:42+00:00): Thanks, redundant relation deleted 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54021229
SK53 (2017-11-28 16:00:07+00:00): Im sorry but I have to revert much of this. This is not a building named OSMF it is a private residence, which happens, for historical reasons to be the registered address for official correspondence.
aaronsta (2017-11-22 02:39:26+00:00): Hi herriotto,
This changeset has been reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53989819

Please make sure to verify your edits, you should not be using outdated third party information to do editing. ESRI imagery is more outdated than MapBox imagery for this location. You should not be basing your edits on either of these sources for this location.

Even if you have no familiarity with the area and have never visited it before, you should verify your information, the highway=construction and construction=motorway ways should be enough to alert you that you should verify your edits.

Details confirming the current alignment can be found in the link below where the road alignment was changed from the 28th of August this year.
https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/northlinkwa/ProjectNews/Pages/newsarticle.aspx?NewsArticleId=34

Cheers,
herriotto (2017-11-22 19:16:52+00:00): Hi Aaronsta,
Thanks for the feedback. I left my earlier comment before seeing your explanation. In terms of looking at the most up todate tile set for an area, is there somewhere to check the age of the tile assets? I right click on the tile for info, but am not finding any dates to verify earliest aerial imagery asset. Cheers
aaronsta (2017-11-23 10:58:30+00:00): Hi Herriotto :)
FIrst off, sorry if I came off a bit too harsh previously! It is fantastic to have someone editing in this area!

It is a bit hard to work out imagery dates, as you could have one date for an image in one area, and several kms away it could have been taken on a different day.

Living in Perth, what I tend to do is look at a recent thing that has been built or changed and see if it shows up on an the aerial images.

I had a quick look and worked out the following dates for the iD OSM website editor:
DigitalGlobe Premium (2012)
DigitalGlobe Standard (2014)
MapBox (August to November 2016)
Bing (mid-Jaunary to mid-February 2017)
ESRI (mid-February 2017 to mid-March 2017)
In my previous comment I was mistaken, saying ESRI was older, it is actually DigitalGlobe stuff which is significantly older. ESRI is the most recent imagery in the iD OSM webstie editor.

99% of the time these aerial images are good, only for the newer stuff can it be a bit more tricky. Personally I have found a mix of searching the web for info and maps and visiting places on my daily commute enough to get my info.

Like you have been doing, I also use a lot of Landgate data and maps from data.wa.gov.au, for things like road names, in combination with the JOSM program to do edits where you can overlay maps using the WMS (web-map service) links from the data.wa.gov.au website. But, they are removing the old SLIP Enabler services at the end of December, and changing things, so these services might not be available soon.

So really any and all information you can get your hands on, you can use to check stuff. In terms of websites these three are very helpful:
https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/locate/
(Good all round)
https://maps.landgate.wa.gov.au/maps-landgate/registered/
(For the most up-to-date imagery available (Early August 2017), and for historical imagery (click buy aerial photo))
https://mrapps.mainroads.wa.gov.au/publicmaps/rim
(For road official road heirarchy (how roads are classified in OSM) and for speed data (maxspeed=*))

Thanks for your edits,
Cheers,
Aaron
jharpster (2017-12-04 22:25:02+00:00): Hi Aaron, Thanks for all the detail. Question about the road hierarchy. How closely do you model the OSM roads to the 'official' hierarchy as defined by the government in WA?
aaronsta (2017-12-07 16:52:42+00:00): Generally it should be an exact match.

Urban Areas:
primary distributor = trunk or motorway (motorway is a controlled access road (i.e only slip-roads to enter and exit the road, no houses, driveways or traffic signals))
distributor A = primary
distributor B = secondary
local distributor = tertiary
access road = residential or service (or track/ cycleway/ footway depending on circumstances)

Non-urban areas:
As above, except:
regional distributor = primary

Exceptions are when there has been construction which would affect the road heirarchy, and not yet updated on the MainRoads WA website or where ever else you are sourcing this information from.

or some other road condition which does not match reality (i.e a dead-end road shown as a through road by MainRoads and as a tertiary road, should perhaps be downgraded to residential, or a road which does not exist, or exists only as a narrow unpaved track *depending on the specific circumstances.

Note in regional W.A. many roads should still be marked as a higher classification as per MainRoads, even if they are 4WD only dirt tracks, as they may be the only significant access route to the area.

Here's a document on the road heirarchy detailing how the roads are classified:
https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/Documents/Road%20Hierarchy%20Criteria%20-%20April%202011.u_3158367r_1n_D11%5E2392185.PDF
herriotto (2017-11-22 16:13:49+00:00): Hi aaronsta, not long on the OSM editing so wanted to ask was I incorrect to adjust intersection on Collier road using Strava heatmap and ESRI imagery? Thanks, it will help to avoid any future errors on my part