piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MarcoR (2020-04-24 13:07:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto!
Ho rimosso qualche doppione che avevi inserito per sbaglio. La struttura effettua consegne a domicilio o vendita da asporto in questo periodo o è temporaneamente chiusa?
hoserab (2020-04-22 23:58:02+00:00): Hello again. I noticed you added the outline of the former quarry that was on Nose Hill. It's true that there once was a quarry there, but OSM is for mapping things that are "both real and current" (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome). The quarry was closed decades ago; it's all now parkland, covered with aspen trees and scrub. I've therefore removed it.

FYI there is a similar project to OSM called "Open Historical Map" where mapping historical uses is the whole purpose of the project. I've added a few things from the Calgary area to it; they're currently migrating servers. See https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
mueschel (2020-04-24 09:08:51+00:00): Hi,
is there already a documentation of this new recycling:code tag?
ACarlotti (2020-05-08 14:56:33+00:00): Should there be an apostrophe in the name?
hoserab (2020-04-22 23:31:35+00:00): Hi there, FYI I changed this from a "minor/unclassified road" to a "path", as there is no vehicle access here anymore. You can still tag paths with info such as you did here, with a paved surface and a description that it was once a service road.

Cheers!
fmarier (2020-04-25 15:59:58+00:00): The phone number was missing the country code ("+1") and so I added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84111749.
woodpeck (2020-04-23 09:50:50+00:00): Hello MenKauRa, it would be extremely helpful if you could use changeset comments that describe the work you have done, instead of simply writing the date and hour of the edit! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for more information
Elflo (2020-04-23 21:54:27+00:00): #amm #acl #mt5 #dcc
rab (2020-04-25 06:38:30+00:00): Hello,
in this changeset, you screwed up several building footprints. Please note that most satellite images are not taken exactly verticall from above. You have to switch between the different background layers to understand the real shape of tall buildings and to find eventually  hidden structures. I also see that you are acting as a validator in this project. May I ask you how this is possible with a changesets_count of 9
osmviborg (2020-04-23 04:21:04+00:00): Hej. Du bruger navnefeltet forkert. Her er der jo ikke tale om navne; men om beskrivelse af objektet. I feltet 'Tilføj felt' finder du feltet 'Beskrivelse', brug det i stedet.
seattlefyi (2020-04-23 16:16:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the details! Just a friendly tip that the OSM convention is to expand street name abbreviations (Ave -> Avenue, NE -> Northeast). Also, the pattern on other streets nearby appears to be to use the numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.) -- I've already updated it to be 3rd instead of Third. Thanks again, and hope to see more edits!
Supaplex (2020-04-23 04:34:54+00:00): construction沒刪掉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83965906
Vintagejhan (2020-04-23 06:09:54+00:00): 已修正
Elflo (2020-04-23 21:54:03+00:00): #amm #acl #mt5 #dcc
VictorIE (2022-04-12 05:22:00+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795029262

"I can't tell from imagery whether this is one terrace or 3 pairs of semi-D. And there is complexity in the back that needs refining."

There is new Bing aerial imagery.
user_6771650 (2020-04-23 01:47:59+00:00): Hey - welcome to OpenStreetMap! Just so you know, in OSM, we don't use street abbreviations. So when you can, change the abbreviations to the full name (St. --> Street). Let me know if you have any questions.
user_6771650 (2020-04-23 01:50:10+00:00): And that goes for the other abbreviations, too, to be clear. Ave, Dr, Rd, should all be expanded.
RonniNichols (2020-05-04 17:51:44+00:00): Thanks for changing these for me. This newbie appreciates all help.
Gazer75 (2020-04-23 21:09:50+00:00): Huske på at det er highway=toll_gantry for autopass stasjonar. highway=toll_booth er for manuelle ;)
gormur (2020-04-24 09:38:31+00:00): Ja, var nok annet holde styr på... 
Har f.eks ikke funnet nye vegnummer på "Motorveien" mellom Madlaveien og Ullandhaugveien.
Du er selvfølgelig velkommen til å fikse :)
Gazer75 (2020-04-24 17:00:14+00:00): Viktigaste er at vegnettet er på plass. Resten vil kome etter kvart som NVDB er oppdatert. Stavanger ser ut til å ta nye flyfoto kvart år i april så dei vil nok dukke opp til vinteren ein gong når dei er klare.
Colin Smale (2020-04-23 07:31:15+00:00): There is no such admin boundary... What was your source for this? I am proposing to delete this relation, or possibly convert it to a place=village, depending on your source
user_177389 (2020-04-23 10:35:48+00:00): Hello,

the source is the information from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794833579/history version #1.

Regards, Mario
Colin Smale (2020-04-23 11:18:08+00:00): I apologise, I need to contact the original mapper!
user_177389 (2020-04-23 11:27:50+00:00): No problem, it is good that you ask and that everything should be correct.
JodaStephen (2020-04-23 21:30:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding golf course details. For your info, it is generally recommended to add the source tag to the changeset, not individual objects, particularly for general things like "Bing". No particular need to fix this - just for future reference.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83966780
AvidFan (2020-04-24 09:54:41+00:00): Hi thanks. I'm going to be using the data created in another program (to generate the golf course in another application which also pulls in the LIDAR data from DEFRA)  which specifically uses the data from bing so if anybody else is adding splines for fairways, rough etc (any course features) and they use any other aerial source the features may be in the wrong position so I guess adding the tag is an encouragement by me!
mapman44 (2020-04-23 02:23:41+00:00): Thanks for adding the gate. For it to be effective in routing, it needs to be on the road so I moved it there. Check it out.
oz81dog (2020-04-24 19:32:34+00:00): Thank you! I'm new to this but I really want to start adding all the gates I run across. They're everywhere around here and none of them are on any maps. I've found a comprehensive list from Weyerhaeuser so I'll be adding all of them in my spare time but that's just one company's private land.
pantufla (2020-04-24 18:05:14+00:00): Hola, qué es lo que tenía mal el nombre?
KTim (2020-07-01 09:01:54+00:00): Hi, woher stammen deine Infos für den Nord-Süd-Trail? Ich habe vor Ort nirgendwo einen Hinweis darauf gefunden.
Feuerhabicht (2020-07-15 18:28:53+00:00): Hi, der Weg ist, ähnlich wie der Friedensweg, eine Aneinanderreihung bestehender längerer Wanderwege mit dem Ziel, einen Fernwanderweg in Deutschland zu schaffen, der der Länge der 3 großen Fernwanderwegen in den USA ähnelt. Bis jetzt gibt es nur den E1 und der ist viel kürzer (auf Deutschland bezogen).
Feuerhabicht (2020-07-15 18:30:17+00:00): Die ersten rund 1900 km sind ausgezeichnet. Du findest ein grünes Symbol, ähnlich einer Kompassrose, auf dem Weg.
artem95vlasovets (2020-04-27 17:15:30+00:00): Hi. You have massively deleted a lot of roads. Can you provide detailed information confirming their absence? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83967940
rab (2020-04-28 18:37:21+00:00): because somebody has to clean up this mess?
https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/6076#bottom
limes11 (2020-06-21 21:34:57+00:00): Hallo Lightspirit, 

Ich versuche den Hintergrund deiner Änderungen hier zu verstehen. Was ist die Begründung für foot=no auf diesem Weg und anderen Wegen in der Umgebung? Und warum hast du die ganzen überflüssigen horse=no, motor_vehicle=no Werte hinzugefügt, die alle mit access=no abgedeckt sind? Das ist keine "Verbesserung der Tags". Des Weiteren sind deine Änderungen für andere Mapper schwer nachvollziehbar, wenn du jedem changeset den gleichen nichtssagenden Kommentar gibst. Offensichtlich dienen alle Änderungen  dem Zweck, Tags zu verbessern. Quellenangaben wären gut. 

Beste Grüße, Limes
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:22:24+00:00): This should be converted into address
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83968992
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:23:22+00:00): Wrong English name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969110
gscholz (2020-04-24 04:29:31+00:00): Hi alma,
her again a changeset that addes errors about self intersecting lines to the OSM database:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.30703&lat=20.10416&zoom=11&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Here you can see, how those ways are overlapping:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-90.30703&lat=20.10416&zoom=11&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Cany ou please fix this?

Guido
gscholz (2020-04-24 04:32:30+00:00): Hola Alma
ella nuevamente un conjunto de cambios que agrega errores sobre las líneas auto intersectantes a la base de datos OSM:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.30703&lat=20.10416&zoom=11&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Aquí puedes ver cómo se superponen esas formas:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-90.30703&lat=20.10416&zoom=11&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

¿Puedes por favor arreglar esto?

Guido
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:25:07+00:00): Don't remove names from `landuse=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969658
azsr (2020-04-27 15:27:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing. But next time could you please cross-check against newer imagery? In this area, Maxar is generally the most recent vintage, and it clearly shows that 1) the house in Esri Clarity has been demolished, and 2) the driveway is more of a "straight shot" into the garage. This is also shown on normal Esri and Mapbox.

Thanks!
azsr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969813
sunilaak (2020-04-28 03:42:45+00:00):  Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the edit. I apologise for the issue my edit has caused here. I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(84230924).Will surely follow your suggestion of checking the updated imagery before I make edits.
Regards,
sunilaak
azsr (2020-04-28 19:24:57+00:00): No problem. Thanks for making the change.
mapman44 (2020-04-23 12:49:35+00:00): Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
jonboeke (2020-04-23 18:24:50+00:00): @mapman44

Can you point me to a specific change that was in error? I like to learn from my mistakes. Thank you!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:55:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mariotomo (2021-07-09 19:48:20+00:00): hola. necesitas ayuda para mapear puentes, en particular el manejo de la etiqueta "layer"?
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:25:45+00:00): How are these `=suburb`?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970011
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:26:54+00:00): Please don't remove sidewalks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:28:16+00:00): Some of them for example are different, physically separated
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389
Kovoschiz (2020-04-23 08:29:43+00:00): Don't remove street details from a sidewalk
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970580
mapman44 (2020-04-23 12:44:28+00:00): Thanks for all your very detailed work on this. However sometimes simple is better, and sometimes too many map elements just looks cluttered and confusing. You may want to think about what is really needed to navigate through the gas station and carwash. Thanks
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:56:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BER319 (2020-05-16 09:30:04+00:00): Hallo StefanHRT,

wilkommen bei OSM. Hier sind dir ein paar Fehler unterlaufen.

Der Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648699024
führ zu einer Packstation, daher bestimmt nicht privat.

Der Node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2186997
wurde als Tor wurde direkt auf die Straße gesetzt und sperrt diese dadurch für alle Router. Ich habe das schon geändert.

Bitte etwas mehr aufpassen und solche Sachen am besten vor Ort kontrollieren und anpassen.

Vielen Dank
BER319
StefanHRT (2020-05-16 10:22:01+00:00): Hallo BER319,
Danke für die Hinweise, ich werde es auf alle Fälle Berücksichtigen. Danke auch für die Korrektur.
Mittlerweile lade ich mir meine Rad-Touren immer hoch, damit ich anhand der GPS-Tracks die Tore an die richtige Stelle setzen kann und Wege für Radfahren auf No setze wenn diese nicht geeignet sind (z.B. Spielplätze oder Privatstraßen)
Viele Grüße 
Stefan
BER319 (2020-05-16 14:00:09+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

vielen Dank für deine schnelle Antwort.

Bitte beachte, nur wenn es für ein Fahrrad nicht geeignet ist, dann ist es nicht verboten. Ein bicycle=no sollte auch so beschildert sein oder entsprechende gesetzliche Regelungen bestehen.

Bitte schaue dir die entsprechenden Access Regelungen einmal im Wiki an.

z.B.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Oder auch hier findest du viele gute Tips

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14


Bitte beachte, das ein access=no alle Betrifft auch Fußgänger. Der entsprechende Access Tag bitte nur ab Grundstücksgrenze eintragen, das bedeutet den Weg aufzuteilen.

Falls du die Absicht hast länger dabei zu sein, empfehle ich dir den JOSM Editor und für unterwegs die App Vespucci.

Viele Grüße 
BER319
VictorIE (2025-05-24 18:58:53+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7436597849

Should this be tagged:
amenity=monastery
community:gender=mixed
chachafish (2020-04-24 00:34:42+00:00): Howdy. Thank you for your additions to the map. Did you mean to put a space between the two words in the name here?
rojganes (2020-04-27 07:27:01+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the mistake. I've made the changes under changeset(#84178491). I Will ensure not to repeat the error again. Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
rojganes.
chachafish (2020-04-27 16:51:34+00:00): Thanks, buddy :)
tanish1980 (2020-04-25 13:01:22+00:00): plz check the draw there are overlaps and unwanted features. please remove it accordingly. Keep going..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83978883
Warin61 (2020-04-25 10:59:03+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

An issue with Way: 795123700
  Tags: 
    "addr:suburb"="Ivanhoe East"
    "addr:housenumber"="154"
    "building"="house"

There are 2 building here and you have connected them in one way such that they cross over with no 'space'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.05066&lat=-37.77388&zoom=18

It think the smaller of the two is a garage as a driveway leads to it, so it is not a house.
Samuel Vasko (2020-05-11 10:56:20+00:00): Seems like there is gap between Mangrove Lane (355279756, v6) and 11855220, v4.
Essex_Boy (2020-05-11 14:32:04+00:00): Hi Samuel, can you tell me which feature you see a gap on?
Samuel Vasko (2020-05-11 14:50:05+00:00): Sorry, create a note 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2189081
eneerhut (2020-04-26 08:15:37+00:00): Hi Anil,
I noticed you're using the #map2020 hashtag a lot. I was wondering if you were aware of the #map2020 campaign Mapillary and HOT are running which uses the same hashtag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83980109
Anil Basnet (2020-04-28 06:53:05+00:00): I was quite unfamiliar about #map2020 campaign Mapillary and HOT are running. I was using this #map2020 hashtag so that I could see the difference brought by me in OSM by mapping throughout the year; it was coincidence that the hashtag matched with Mapillary and HOT's campaign. After your comment on the changeset, I searched about that campaign and found that campaign is very good. I would also like to put some efforts from my side as well to that campaign. I will be using Mapillary as well.  Should I continue using that hashtag or not. Your suggestion will be appreciable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83980109
eneerhut (2020-04-30 01:41:25+00:00): Totally makes sense Anil. I guess it is a fairly generic hashtag in the year of 2020 ;)

More information on Map2020 can be found here:
https://www.mapillary.com/map2020

We'd be happy to walk you through it on webinar, although applications to participate officially ended on the 26th of March.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83980109
Anil Basnet (2020-05-05 13:43:40+00:00): It would be my immense pleasure to participate in the webinar.
user_5359 (2020-04-23 14:10:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Olga | Yanosik (2020-08-11 08:39:41+00:00): Witam, czy droga w m. Racławki jest nadal w remoncie, nieprzejezdna? Drobna uwaga - 
zamykając drogę na czas remontu trzeba zmienić tag highway na construction lub dodać access=no.
Pozdrawiam
Olga
Colin Smale (2020-04-23 07:52:07+00:00): Please don't fiddle with admin boundaries. They are where they are, whether or not you think it should be otherwise. I have fixed this up twice already... And also, a more descriptive changeset comment, in English as you are editing in London, would be much appreciated! Thanks
abakus_uploader (2020-04-23 22:30:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Vinber (2020-04-23 17:58:39+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-04-25 08:42:49+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
تغییراتی که شما در نقشه ایجاد کردید باعث شده مشکلات و خرابی هایی در قسمتهایی از نقشه شده است.
برای ادیت نقشه نیاز هست با انواع تگ ها و کاربرد آنها آشنا باشید.
پیشنهاد میکنم برای راهنمایی بیشتر از گروه تلگرامی ادیتورهای osm استفاده کنید.
https://t.me/OpenStreetMap
mueschel (2020-04-26 09:06:53+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys! I'm currently fixing trivial spelling mistakes by you and your team on almost a daily basis.  Please improve your QA before uploading.
AndjelaS (2020-04-26 18:08:18+00:00): Thanks for pointing it out to me and correcting it. It is really helpful and we appreciate that.
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-24 20:54:25+00:00): Bonjour  daissi. Merci de vos contributions à OSM. Vous avez demandé à  ce qu'on vérifie cette déchetterie. Je n'y vois rien à redire. Vous semblez connaître https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#D.C3.A9chetterie_ou_d.C3.A9ch.C3.A8terie
Nhésitez pas à revenir si besoin. Bonne soirée. Jacques
Szymson (2020-04-23 18:47:12+00:00): Hey, why don't you try using this: background layer -> background settings -> polska.e-mapa.net: Buildings ?

Эй, почему бы тебе не попробовать это: фоновый слой - > настройки фона -> polska.e-mapa.net: Buildings
highflyer74 (2020-04-24 06:46:17+00:00): See discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83984384
Frans S (2020-04-23 12:09:23+00:00): Hello SHABANI MAGAWILA,
I think something went terrible wrong with your mapping on this changeset.
I took a look in OSMcha and was curious to know what was happened here.
I opened this changeset in JOSM and ran a validation check. 
It gave me a return of nearly 1300 warnings about unconnected nodes without physical tags
So the ways which makes the building and the tag are disappeared
Please take a look by yourself.
I Have no idea what your actions were. but this needs to be solved.
I suggest to revert this changeset to the situation before you started to edit.
If you was working on the same spot since than, it might be wise to revert them as well, otherwise you risk a lot of upload errors
If you need help contact me please.
Here or on Slack  (Frans Schutz)
Frans S (2020-04-23 12:25:43+00:00): Update.
It seems even worse. 10.000 warnings on this changeset

Before you take action I will ask for advise how to solve this at best
Best regards