piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-10-05 07:21:55+00:00): Hallo philb77,
Du hast an diesem Garagen-Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377004840
die Adresse
- addr:housenumber=2
- addr:street=An der Halde
ergänzt. Die Garage hat aber gar keine eigene Adresse. Diese gehört zum Wohnhaus und ist hier auch bereits korrekt eingetragen:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377004850/history

Außerdem hast Du das Merkmal
building=yes
abgeändert auf
building=detached
Das ist falsch. Passender wäre
building=garage. Wobei building=yes auch nicht falsch ist.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder soll ich das für Dich berichtigen ?

Grüße aus dem westl. Landkreis BC
PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
philb77 (2021-10-06 19:02:37+00:00): Ich hatte die Änderung über die App StreeComplete vorgenommen. IMHO war die Fragestellung der App damit nicht ganz angebracht. Ich hab versucht es nun zu korrigieren. Passt es so?
PT-53 (2021-10-07 06:59:25+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung und teilw. Bereinigung.

Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377004837/history
paßt es jetzt, hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377004837
noch nicht.

Grüße
PT-53 (2021-10-05 07:09:55+00:00): Siehe Kommentar zu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111782121#map=19/48.18037/9.90603
charl3s (2022-01-07 23:02:40+00:00): Nie zostawiaj znacznika construction po wybudowaniu drogi. To blokuje nawigacje.
Błędne drogi: 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eUH
Miłego mapowania!
bigopenmac (2021-10-04 19:06:39+00:00): Правильный комент здесь должен был быть такой:
Начал Indoor Mapping в ТЦ Диамонд
Kovoschiz (2021-10-05 10:21:13+00:00): 1. Please transfer names completely when creating new object. 
2. `maxspeed:advisory=` is only used for signed suggested speed, not what you think it should be.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-05 12:09:10+00:00): 1. Please don't create duplicate objects.
MxxCon (2021-10-05 02:52:25+00:00): Hello.
Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments rather than just "bing"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112092056
woodpeck (2021-10-09 20:45:07+00:00): Dear Jay May, please take the time to use proper changeset comments that explain what you did in *this* particular changeset, and do not use the same changeset comment for everything you do.
Glassman (2021-10-04 21:15:19+00:00): #TIP: It is helpful to split edits into small geographical areas, like a few city blocks instead of the entire US. Streetcomplete makes it easy to do, but it is helpful when you split them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112092164
gmar5 (2021-10-05 10:04:10+00:00): Hi – 'farmland' is normally used for arable fields with crops; 'meadow' for hay meadows and pasture, which seems more appropriate here.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-05 11:50:58+00:00): Please don't add descriptive labels.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-05 12:03:18+00:00): The `=footway` you drawn duplicates with the already existing `=steps`
Lee Carré (2021-10-04 20:57:53+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
vulasala (2021-10-05 05:42:17+00:00): Hi hobbsalicia9,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors at way 583619235, as there is overlapping of building polygons and residential way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112092485
user_17222985 (2024-07-12 18:19:23+00:00): place=municipality для територіальних громад це бред полний 

Видношо ти вообще погано знаєш англійську 
Municipality це по євро пейськи муніципалітет або в контесті України міська рада 
Скасуй сам і не збивай з пантелику іноземців 
Так іспанською наша громада перекладається як municipio яке схоже на англійське municipality
mavl (2021-10-05 02:09:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, по какой причине обычное здание преобразовано в мультиполигон?
jleedev (2021-10-07 14:47:05+00:00): Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-10-08 18:11:54+00:00): Thank you.
felipeeugenio (2021-10-05 19:01:49+00:00): Hola Mario
Una cosa es el edificio y otra completamente distinta es el colegio. Lo que nos estás diciendo acá es que si das un paso fuera del edificio ya estás fuera del colegio. Por favor mapeen predios en lo posible. Los edificios son otra cosa.
en su defecto dejen los nodos.
saludos
aceman444 (2022-10-03 21:13:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968456325 nastupistia su uz reprezentovane bodmi a tie su v relaciach busov. Tato plocha mi potom pride ako duplicita a hlavne bez nazvu a dalsich vlastnosti je to dost zbytocne. Nechal by som to ako highway=platform. Aj susedne nastupiste je rovnako.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Daniel Palenski (2021-10-04 23:14:10+00:00): Still not in use yet everything seems to installed apart from beg buttons
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112094214
mariotomo (2022-09-17 23:57:48+00:00): hola Rick, un comentario, no de mi parte sino de Mateusz Konieczny, a propósito de "valores unútiles" para la etiqueta "surface": https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-July/087676.html

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126302152
DoKimbDeSun (2021-10-05 17:30:13+00:00): Servus, danke fürs Aufräumen am Wimberg! Ich habe nur den Namen noch geändert, die Bücherleiten ist nur der Wald zwischen Neureitkopf und Mörtlbach. Die Gaißauer Seite gehört eigentlich nicht mehr dazu. Bist du ein neuer Mapper oder hast du nur einen neuen Acc? Nur aus Neugier
user_14076949 (2021-10-05 18:42:40+00:00): Hallo kaslewakas, ich sehe gerade dass Du ein lokaler Mappe bist. Du bist wesentlich erfahrener und länger dabei als ich. Vielleicht treffen wir uns mal auf einen Café, das wäre interessant. Sende Dir per Posting Funktion, hierzu eine Nachricht.
Ich räume nichts auf, das ist purer Zufall.
DoKimbDeSun (2021-10-05 19:18:09+00:00): Habe dir geantwortet!
LG
TomPar (2021-11-16 14:09:48+00:00): "Route 17" is on street signs in the area.  By the "For disputed areas, please use the name as displayed on, e.g., street signs for the name tag" from OSM "Name" wiki page, the road does have a "name".
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 11:06:48+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:06:03+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did not see any information on the OSM wiki page stating that names on links in Venezuela was part of the country hierarchy, so I was following OSM guidelines of links not having names applied to them. However, I will leave the names on links in the future per your request.
julcnx (2021-10-05 09:55:20+00:00): Thanks for your contributions. In the future, please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112094711
mariotomo (2021-10-04 22:00:30+00:00): :-)
vorpalblade (2021-10-10 22:46:47+00:00): Just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite".

JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

If you ever get into micromapping, I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. There is a plugin for JOSM, but iD does not use it (unfortunately).

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
hpautumngrl (2021-10-10 23:38:35+00:00): good afternoon! good have sworn i was on mapbox for that one since i had been for the other recent edits, sorry about that. adjusted those buildings to the Mesa County GIS though. I can't always get JOSM to work on my laptop (it's a little old and slow) so i was just using iD. Seems like i can access RapiD now though so my edits should be a little more accurate. i'll look into that plugin for JOSM though and see if i can't get it up and running. thanks for the tips, hpautumngrl
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112095072
Stefan@MUC (2022-09-04 14:39:47+00:00): Wieso die Positionsverschiebung der Power Substation + der Abfallcontainer? Die war weitestgehend korrekt, hab's eben nochmal vor Ort überprüft. 

Ein "recycling:type=underfloor-container" gibt's nicht und gibt eigentlich ne validation warning. Korrekte Auszeichnung siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Examples

Daten sind mit Changeset 112095318 korrigiert
MehrGenerationenWohnhaus (2022-09-04 16:48:15+00:00): Hi Danke und bitte entschuldige. Das kleine Verschieben war ein Versehen. Ich werde nächstesmal vorsichtiger sein.
bhietsch (2021-10-04 21:35:58+00:00): I'll ask again... please stop adding these farmland polygons. They are not contributing any value since there is already an existing farmland multipolygon. I will be deleting all of the ones you added in the Bellefonte area unless I get a reply.
jrh31990 (2021-10-04 21:43:38+00:00): oh sorry, noted will not happen again.
user_2066394 (2021-10-05 09:57:12+00:00): Wenn der Kindergarten im Bau und noch nicht fertiggestellt ist, dann war building=construction schon in Ordnung.
Ggf. noch construction=kindergarten und proposed:amenity=kindergarten ergänzen.

Analog beim Spielplatz.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dconstruction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Stefan@MUC (2022-08-14 13:35:21+00:00): Eine Kleinigkeit: Bitte als Änderungstext angeben *was* (und vielleicht wieso) du etwas geändert hast - und nicht, wo du wohnst, das ist für die Änderung nicht relevant.
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 18:15:16+00:00): Das war wohl eher ein einmaliges Engagement :-) Letzte Tätigket im Oktober
Stefan@MUC (2022-08-14 19:04:10+00:00): Das war mir nach Abschicken meines Kommentars dann auch aufgefallen... wollte schon was bezüglich Etikette schreiben. Hab's aber jetzt mit Changeset 124900104 mal korrigiert. Damals war das noch im Bau. Muss da mal wieder vorbeigucken, in wiefern das inzwischen eröffnet ist - online hab ich noch nix gefunden.
MehrGenerationenWohnhaus (2022-08-14 19:11:26+00:00): Hi Ihr ich bin noch da :-).  Aber ich hab das Thema vergessen und jetzt erst Eure Kommentare bekommen. der Spielplatz ist inzwischen geöffnet mit Schaukel Sandkiste und Klettergerüst.  Der Kindergarten ist auch fertig aber wegen Mitarbeitermangel noch geschlossen. Danke für Euer Engagement.
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-05 04:52:52+00:00): Reverted. iD is a very bad editor and it is making BAD advices. River tagging was good.
Денис39 (2021-10-05 07:48:54+00:00): I agree, I was wrong.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-10-24 01:41:28+00:00): Tomas is stubbornly using an outdated tagging scheme that conflicts with the global river modernization project. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization for more information about these efforts to unify river tagging.
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-24 07:40:58+00:00): Friendly_Ghost is stubbornly LYING. He has absolutely no clue in Cartography and/or GIS and therefore is also damaging the quality of OpenStreetMap data by his careless actions. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cartography/Waterways for improving Cartographic quality of OpenStreetMap data.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-10-24 09:20:29+00:00): Dear Денис39 and Tomas Straupis,

I am greatly disappointed in Tomas' ad hominem fallacy. That is not a way to have a constructive discussion. 

Tomas' page makes some claims that are not backed up by anything but your own words. It reeks of edit war.

To Tomas I would like to say that if they're looking for professional cartography, I kindly suggest that they do that outside this community which traditionally has always had a large number of amateur cartographers.

My apologies to Денис39 that they are now part of a seemingly unfriendly debate.

Best regards,

Intruder Ghost (as I have been called by Tomas before)
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-24 09:48:46+00:00): To Anonymous Ghost, nobody has invited you to this discussion, there was no point on joining it IF the only thing you can do is LIE. My Cartography waterways page claims are backed by people who have actually VOTED for the problematic water proposal and that was discussed again again in talk/tagging lists (and you know it). Contrary to the lies in Brian Sperlongano page.
And one additional note: it is perfectly fine that OSM has not a lot of professional cartographers - we are all here to learn. And it is fine to make mistakes. But it is NOT OK when clueless amateurs damage data when the damage is specifically pointed out and explained. Smart people LEARN.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-10-24 10:53:43+00:00): My dear fellow mapper, your project is based on a handful of comments made over ten years ago, which as I mentioned in my first message here is out of date. 

You seem ignorant that natural=water + water=river is valid tagging as approved in the same 2011 proposal, in current documentation and in popular tag usage. 

You may wish to learn more about the current opinions of other mappers. Feel free to ask around in different forums and other platforms as listed in the community index: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_index

I would very much like to know of which lies exactly I stand accused here and what damage may be done by using the tagging scheme which you oppose. This information would be helpful if we are to continue this topic.
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-24 11:43:51+00:00): @Ghost, mapper Денис39 has nothing to do with your lies. If you wish to re-start this old discussion again and again there are much better places to do that. So stop LYING that: 1. waterway=riverbank is (or was ever) deprecated. Stop lygint hat: 2. your proposed tagging is in any way "better" (you have no experiance to evaluate that). Stop lygint that 3. you somehow calculated "concesnus" which would be independent of a. iD forcing mappers to use LESS popular schema b. illegal (by OSM rules) mass retagging of the likes of Brian Sperlongano. You can continue this in different forum/place if there is anything else you want to learn about OSM/Carto/GIS. I see no point in continuing here as you continue to LIE and fail to provide any substantial argument/information.
pbnoxious (2021-10-19 19:56:27+00:00): Ohne genaue Ortskenntnisse: Ist die "Milch- und Genusstankstelle" nicht vermutlich eher eine "amenity=vending_machine" + "vending=food" (also ein Automat der diverse Lebensmittel verkauft) statt einem Hofladen wie eingetragen?
Foonline (2021-10-20 12:22:17+00:00): es sind Automaten, aber nicht nur, deshalb passt Hofladen hier mMn besser.
pbnoxious (2021-10-21 06:38:09+00:00): Ok, dann hab ich nichts gesagt :)
vulasala (2021-10-05 03:50:13+00:00): Hi Vikyatha K ,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation error at way 989744254, as there is overlapping of building polygon and highway.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112096438
ted3sco (2021-10-05 11:06:29+00:00): Salut. De ce aceasta reclasificare ? E drum european, ruta principala intre Craiova si Pitesti.
Glassman (2021-10-08 21:57:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112096721
n76 (2021-10-05 00:16:16+00:00): A signed speed limit of 32 MPH? Seems highly unlikely to me. I guess I’ll need to drive by there this week to check this out.
Greg_Rose (2021-12-07 00:14:44+00:00): Hey Russ - You need to call out the nature of the abandoned rr with the 'abandoned:railway' tag. I'm assuming the CPLCo was narrow gauge - so you'd tag 'abandoned:railway=narrow_gauge'.
Also - using the 'service' tag to note that it was a logging rr isn't the way to do that. I don't remember exactly, but there's a different tag, similar to specifying substance in a pipeline or storage tank. Definitely don't use 'service' though - that will cause all sorts of problems. Cheers...

Greg
GustavoE (2022-03-01 02:31:14+00:00): Hola, tengo los límites y coordenadas oficiales del santuario de la naturaleza Humedales de Angachilla publicada por el Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y así para poder corregir el deslinde del polígono acorde a la real superficie del área protegida proyectada en el mapa. Saludos
uaroadbot (2021-10-05 08:57:52+00:00): Hi, could you please explain this change?
MxxCon (2021-10-05 02:58:32+00:00): For situations where you can't add the whole text, consider locating and linking to wikidata article, if one exist, that references the same object. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112098119
KingKull2112 (2021-10-05 03:58:42+00:00): That's a good call, I didn't know that was a thing. I'll look to see if there is one
KingKull2112 (2021-10-05 04:08:03+00:00): There's one for the site of the Dongan Oak down the path but not for this marker
jmapb (2022-01-16 03:20:27+00:00): Well the land's wet, innit? ;)

This is a little hollow that's been reliably swampy in years past. At the moment, though, it's merely muddy, so I've removed the wetland feature for now.

Cheers, J
Glassman (2021-10-08 22:01:04+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"

#TIP: We spell out street names instead of using abbreviations. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112098290
danieldegroot2 (2025-04-20 20:16:31+00:00): Hey MapCam,

Be careful when mapping objects obscured on aerial imagery.
Where available, you can use streetlevel imagery, though be aware it may be outdated.
('Edit' => right sidebar => Data Layers => i.e. Bing Streetside); solely for your information, proprietary (copyright) sources such as Google Maps etc. can not be used for this.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

It is best not to map these if not sufficiently visible.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Instead, add a 'fixme' tag to request other mappers to survey the location.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme

If you need any help, feel free to contact the local community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=-33.87118,151.20198&zoom=8.36

Removed the unverifiable footway segment in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165210839
EneaSuper (2021-10-05 16:46:01+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che a Bogliasco ci sia un ospedale?
camminatoreseriale (2021-10-06 01:40:39+00:00): Era un vecchio tag del cottolengo da aggiornare come attività ospedaliera. Ma in effeti nel frattempo si era aggiornato lo stato di fatto delle cose, non essendovi più il cottolengo in senso tradizionale. Tu come lo classificheresti? Non è semplicissimo...
EneaSuper (2021-10-06 11:14:20+00:00): Allora, di certo non è un ospedale, e credo si tratti di una semplice casa di riposo, quindi direi che vada classificato in questo modo 🙂
Glassman (2021-10-08 22:02:59+00:00): #TIP: By being a driveway they are assumed to be private so they are assumed to be private. Adding the access=private isn't needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112098417
Puxan (2021-11-04 16:38:25+00:00): Creo que la highway 342465293 debe permitir el paso de un vehículo de 4 ruedas por sus dimensiones por lo que debería cualificarse como trak o unclssified, como tu mismo hiciste hace años (repasa el historial). Creo que estás pasando a path muchas vías que no lo son y la referencia que pones en los comentarios no permite revisar nada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112098436
nevw (2021-10-05 02:41:11+00:00): Hi
you may have missed tagging a middle section of the Mount Urialla Trail 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112098512
urilabob (2021-10-05 03:13:16+00:00): Thank you, I didn't notice. I've now added it. How did you get that image you attached? It made it very clear that I had missed a section
nevw (2021-10-05 03:32:12+00:00): There are may tools to monitor your area of interest, including my own edits, listed here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance  
I often use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Achavi
and https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/
user_3022894 (2023-01-31 19:22:54+00:00): Hallo Der_Hexer,

kurz zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7807233595/history :

ein Geldautomat (bzw. Dinge generell) sind immer *entweder* innerhalb eines Gebäudes liegend (Tag "indoor=yes") *oder* draußen, aber ggf. überdacht (Tag "covered=yes") - aber nicht beides gleichzeitig.

Das heißt, man kennzeichnet ein Objekt entweder als "Im Gebäude" oder als "Überdacht", aber nicht beides. In dem hier vorliegenden Fall hatte ich den Geldautomaten bereits als "indoor" gekennzeichnet. Das nur kurz als Hinweis.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 21:02:05+00:00): Hi,

A few things here:
- Bear Mountain Bridge Road should be trunk as it serves an important link across the Hudson River. See my changeset: <> for more background.
- Bear Mountain State Parkway should also be trunk here. It serves as a bypass for Peekskill, and carries a significant amount of traffic.
- Crompond Road continues to serve this east-west link, and therefore should be trunk. This is the most questionable one, but is consistent with the new guidelines being proposed for trunk roads.
- Taconic State Parkway begins to have RIRO (right-in/right-out) intersections above the Westchester/Putnam county line. Thus, it should not be motorway.

Please message me if you're interested in joining the discussion regarding the new trunk tagging scheme, and I will send you the appropriate links.
Vulcanodong (2021-10-05 08:18:19+00:00): 正式开通了么?
jleedev (2021-10-07 14:45:15+00:00): Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map.
DUGA (2021-10-07 15:15:18+00:00): Hi,

Please tell me the reason that you removed everything within this area.
ElliottPlack (2021-10-07 18:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112229801

You cannot simply delete everything in an area and say sorry. The address nodes deleted were imported with full community agreement, as were the parking lots surveyed. It is fine to update something if it is wrong, but not to delete everything en masse. This affects users of the data as whole streets had been removed.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-10-08 18:11:10+00:00): I apologize to you all, that was a bad error on my end.
woodpeck (2021-10-08 18:13:30+00:00): I have reverted three other deletions by the same user, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5366