piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:09:17+00:00): Ikohl current convention in México on tagging roads (https://bit.ly/3dGETOK) ask not to use the type of the road in the name. Furthermore, "calle" and "camino" are types of roads, so is redundant. :-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92433454
Ikohl (2020-10-19 17:17:19+00:00): Thank you again for reaching out. Camino and Calle were added as prefixes in this area since that is how the names appear in INEGI data as well as on many of the actual road signs in the area. I am aware of the discussion on the forum at the moment about if prefixes should or should not be added to roads. Since there is not a consensus at this point, I am adding the most correct complete name to OSM for streets, which includes prefixes. 


Gracias nuevamente por contactarnos. Camino y Calle se agregaron como prefijos en esta área, ya que así es como aparecen los nombres en los datos del INEGI, así como en muchas de las señales de tránsito reales en el área. Estoy al tanto de la discusión en el foro en este momento sobre si los prefijos deben o no agregarse a las carreteras. Dado que no hay un consenso en este momento, estoy agregando el nombre completo más correcto a OSM para calles, que incluye prefijos.
mosstreet (2020-10-13 22:17:02+00:00):  fed up with apple cleanings with your edits
Tri_Hugger (2020-10-14 23:18:22+00:00): Я ценю вашу заботу о качестве данных OSM и надеюсь объяснить свои рассуждения здесь, чтобы мы могли прийти к взаимопониманию. Мои правки пересечения были основаны на (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link),где говорится, что должен быть физический или нарисованный остров, чтобы оправдать их присутствие. Я согласен, что Советский тракт (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24607702) не принужден входить в круговое движения, вот почему я сохранил части вашей правки. Существует также проблема (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Ways_connecting_to_the_roundabout) в которой говорится, что входы и выходы на перекрестки с круговым движением не должны совместно использовать общий узел. Это представляет собой противоречие в политике OSM в данной ситуации. С учетом сказанного, мне любопытно ваше мнение о геометрии на юго-восточной стороне этой кольцевой развязки, потому что, похоже, существует та же самая ситуация. Если вы считаете, что здесь следует использовать соединение, то мы должны убедиться, что соединение  соединяющие основные магистрали с кольцевой развязкой, не разделяют один и тот же узел кольцевой развязки.
jleedev (2020-11-11 14:57:24+00:00): Just to be clear, are these neighborhood boundaries based on any real source or are they your own invention?
iandees (2020-10-13 19:18:46+00:00): Hi! Thanks for making changes to OSM. I don't think these roads allow for foot traffic. There are nearby trails specific to foot traffic that are already in OSM as separate features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92433848
bkreegs (2020-10-13 20:35:38+00:00): Yeah. There is a bike trail nearby that most people would use (much nicer), but outside of the tunnel, foot traffic is allowed (and there is a sidewalk right next to the road that is different than the bike trail).
IkaroGV (2020-10-13 20:04:52+00:00): Usei a documentación da ordenación parcelaria subida na páxina do concello.
http://www.camarinas.net/pxom/Planos/P_Informacion/Serie_I-2/01-Rede_Viaria.pdf
MapMakerGal (2020-10-13 20:24:18+00:00): Boas. As etiquetaxes do OSM seguen as directrices da súa wiki, neste caso hai unha páxina que fala diso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gl:WikiProject_Revisi%C3%B3n_etiquetado_estradas_auton%C3%B3micas
Se unha estrada non ten clasificación o lóxico é que sexa 'unclassified'. En canto á rede da Deputación, neste caso "DP-XX" é 'tertiaty'. Logo hai excepcións, pero adoitan atoparse en cidades, este non é o caso.

Outra cousa que estaría mellor é que foras máis descritivo á hora de escribir cando rematas as modificacións.

Grazas pola túa axuda, por último comentarche que revises a wiki se tes dúbidas, ou uníndote á comunidade mediante o Telegram (ligazón ó rematar e subir unha edición).
Carnildo (2020-10-15 05:24:30+00:00): Thanks for your contributions!

The best available imagery for rural Spokane County is generally "Esri World Imagery".  It's not quite as new as the default Bing imagery, but it's far sharper.  You can access it through the 'background settings' panel (the button that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper).
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 19:10:17+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.  Aunque está bien la referencia no sé si sea mejor usar también minúsculas, i.e. Eje 1 Ote. https://bit.ly/3dPKfHE
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92434252
4004 (2021-02-01 02:28:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98365727
iWowik (2021-02-01 06:41:51+00:00): День добрый!
Я вас правильно понял, что в старославянском, как минимум, нет буквы ў, и вы не одобряете эту отсебятину?
4004 (2021-02-01 10:48:59+00:00): добрый, нет, только обратил ваше внимание на конфликт с местными
Pollux17 (2020-10-14 09:35:58+00:00): Ciao, le ciclabili che hai creato in questo changeset erano già mappate sotto forma di tag nelle way delle strade, come da wiki per le corsie ciclabili (non separate da barriere fisiche)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_lanes
DressyPear4 (2020-10-14 05:07:37+00:00): Olá, não adicione áreas de modo genérico, use pontos para melhor precisão
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92435185
gabro00 (2020-10-13 20:45:40+00:00): Szia!
A manufacturer címkébe teljes típusszám került, pl. Siemens CPC50. Kicsit overkill információ, ám legyen.
Javaslom a következő címkézést, a fenti példával élve:
manufacturer=Siemens
model=CPC50
gabro00 (2020-10-13 20:49:35+00:00): Elnézésedet kérem, most látom használod a címkét, csak nem mindenhol van szeparálva külön model címkébe.
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-18 05:39:22+00:00): Ezzel kapcsolatban át kell majd néznem az adatforrásokat. Ezeket emailben kapom, és utólag alakítottam át. Mivel ezek pontszerűek, nem érinti a bug amit találtál a posták kapcsán. 
Itt találod a honlapról beszerzett adatok egy részét. Az EV végűeket folyamatosan frissítem, és ahogy nézem a mobiliti és emibi töltőket érinti a bejelentés. AZ adatfájlokat majd át kell szerkeszteni és akkor megjavul a dolog. Az emobi meg eleve jól lesz beimportálva.
gabro00 (2021-05-22 17:23:55+00:00): Szia!
Erre rá tudnál nézni? Információ hiányában nem tudtam megoldani a helyzetet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2680475
❤️‍🔥 (2023-02-25 04:48:40+00:00): hey, on https://osm.org/node/8004486862 you added `emergency=fire_sprinklers` - could you please help me understand what this tag means? 

There is a recently approved tag system which might help in this situation: https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:emergency=fire_service_inlet
Arlo James Barnes (2023-02-25 21:54:16+00:00): Hi kylenz; the tag you linked is for connections that allow hooking a fire engine to permanent plumbing for fire suppression, which is not what this node is. Rather, it is a valve that connects the water main to fire suppression plumbing, so here the 'emergency' key is a subtag for the 'water=emergency' tag.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-02-25 23:37:29+00:00): perfect, thanks for confirming
btwhite92 (2020-10-14 18:45:18+00:00): Why were urbanized parts of Mammoth Lakes covered with large 'natural=wood' polygons as well?
Fluffy89502 (2020-10-14 18:48:32+00:00): I covered it with the wood tag since the area is still relatively wooded. if you think that that is inappropriate I can undo such edits.
rivermont (2020-10-20 16:04:11+00:00): Hi,
Why did you make this change? I had just created a boundary relation that includes this and a bunch more ways that you missed by just changing the tags on this.

Fixed in changeset #92779234
4004 (2020-10-18 22:55:08+00:00): hi trigeo, thanks for another edit.
not sure I can see the logic why the link should be of a lower road type that the one it leads to?
trigeo (2020-10-19 17:11:51+00:00): 4004, 

Thanks for your feedback I have reverted the change to a link and added turn lanes as per the OSM wiki for link classified ways.
4004 (2020-10-19 17:24:13+00:00): thanks, please revert the other changesets as well
4004 (2020-10-18 22:55:24+00:00): hi trigeo, thanks for another edit.
not sure I can see the logic why the link should be of a lower road type that the one it leads to?
trigeo (2020-10-19 17:25:10+00:00): 4004, Thanks for your feedback the way was changed from a link classification to match other major intersections in the area where the way continues through the intersection including way 195524708, way 285947258, way 150991614, way 288432188, way 158089144
4004 (2020-10-19 17:44:24+00:00): I think you're missing the context with those other ways: they are all parts of a street that goes on after the intersection. Here, the link is not part of either street
trigeo (2020-10-19 18:18:01+00:00): 4004, 
Thank you for the additional feedback. 

If the practice in Belarus is to add links then I will follow that editing practice here. Thanks for the help
4004 (2020-10-19 19:45:46+00:00): by no means am I an expert on local practice, but just wanted to point that these are two different situations, one would suit a link, the other one continues the street as-is. good luck
skquinn (2020-10-14 15:34:11+00:00): Please save before moving to a new area.
Supaplex030 (2020-10-16 15:19:25+00:00): Danke :) Wunderte mich heute vor Ort, wo mein fixme geblieben ist... Frage mich aber immer noch, warum sie auf die Fläche nicht einfach doppelt so viele stands gestellt haben (oder die gleiche Anzahl mit dem halben Flächenverbrauch), oder sollen die großen Abstände Lastenfahrradkompatibel sein..?
!bm (2020-10-16 16:01:44+00:00): Gerne, manchmal passieren noch Wunder und jemand erledigt (zufällig) ein fixme – ich musste auch dreimal hingucken, ob es wirklich nicht mehr sind. Evt sollte man eine entsprechende note= hinzufügen?
flohoff (2021-09-17 10:34:03+00:00): Moin
ich bin gerade über dieses stück Straße gestolpert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306864334


Das ist living_street mit maxspeed=20 - das geht ja nicht.

Entweder ist das living_street also Zeichen 325 Verkehrsberuhigt, dann gilt da Schrittgeschwindigkeit - also kein maxspeed, oder das ist 20 (Zone 20 möglicherweise) dann ist das kein Verkehrsberuhigt also residential anstatt von living_street

Keine Ahnung wie das vor Ort aussieht.

Flo
herisusa (2021-09-18 22:48:37+00:00): Nabend,
das Stückchen Brockhäger Str. ist versehentlich living street geworden, hab ich gerade zu residential korrigiert.
Rund um die Kirche könnte auch falsch sein, ich schau da morgen mal nach.
Gruß
Heribert
JandaM (2020-10-23 13:42:20+00:00): Please STOP editing in the CZECH REPUBLIC. Your edits introduces new errors. You move buildings to wrong positions. GPS and BING maps are not precise. I will suggest another BAN for you if you will not obey OSM rules. M
fell3 (2020-10-25 18:06:47+00:00): Ahoj JardaM
Vždy se snažím dodržovat pravidla OSM
Také se vždy snažím pracovat co nejpřesněji.
Uznávám, že se mohou stát chyby.
Ale nikdo není bezchybný.
Bohužel chyby se stávají těm, kteří toho dělají hodně.
Pokud zjistím chybu nebo na mě upozorním, opravím ji.
Miluji Českou republiku a na moje volny čas jsem téměř výhradně v České republice.
Mám tedy 90% údajů z České republiky a pouze 10% údajů z Německa.

Vím, že Bing je nepřesný, ale GPS je přesný a moje pozorování na místě.

Co používáte, co je přesnější ????

Rád bych vás pozval ke mně, pak si můžeme promluvit u sklenice piva a všeho.
Říkám to vážně! Bydlím 6 km od Varnsdorfu a nebojím se Corony. 
Pro bezpečnost dezinfikujeme Slivovic.
Mnoho pozdravů z Lužických hor
Karsten Schiller
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-14 05:46:05+00:00): iD siūlo NETEISINGUS keitimus, nereikia niekada klausyti, atstačiau teisingas kūdros žymas.
literan (2020-10-14 20:19:59+00:00): ну а остальные теги от ТНК зачем оставили? Исправил.
Strubbl (2020-10-13 20:41:56+00:00): Danke! :)
dvdhoven (2020-10-14 05:33:43+00:00): Paar opmerkingen:
Bij knooppuntroutes kun je de note tag niet gebruiken voor opmerkingen.
Ooit is de note tag gekaapt voor de naam van de route, inmiddels zijn we in Nederland overgegaan op ref, maar dat is nog niet overal gerealiseerd, dus knooppuntnet.nl beschouwt de note tag als naam van de route.
Je kunt het beste remark gebruiken.
Ik heb dat nu ook zo aangepast.
Bij incomplete of gedeeltelijk bestaande routes, kun je het beste de tag fixme=incomplete gebruiken.
knooppuntnet.nl zet de route dan in een aparte lijst en merkt de route niet meer als onderbroken aan.
Ik heb dat ook aangepast.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
JesseFTW (2021-12-29 04:39:37+00:00): Also, the same thing here -- with "[web]".
ralley (2020-10-14 04:51:33+00:00): This changeset has changed a wood polygon into a cycling track, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking for guidelines on how to map MTB tracks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92438739
Norah Jones (2020-10-13 21:32:13+00:00): Dear Hannes,

please make sure to give proper "source" tags at each changeset. This comes clearly not from OSM-carto.

Best wishes,
Norah
Hannes Röst (2021-06-18 14:45:58+00:00): thanks, yes this is CanVec  031L07 as indicated in the comment
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:20:21+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

No es necesario agregar este "node" ya que el parque ya tiene su propio "way". ¿Un parque tiene número exterior en su dirección?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92439014
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:21:18+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is GOOD.

Aquí agrega el nombre del parque.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92439014
trial (2025-09-07 19:21:12+00:00): Bonjour l'Angevin, en partant des cartes des années 50... aussi, mais en mettant la carte actuelle en parallèle, je ne trouve pas le même tracé :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11751555#map=18/48.215160/-3.133882&layers=N
https://geobretagne.fr/sviewer/dual.html?x=-349081&y=6142765&z=16
Il me semble que la gare de Bon Repos était traversante, et ça semble logique.
josmougn (2021-08-08 22:23:27+00:00): est-ce que ces corrections résolvent ces 2 notes ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2047250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1676625
blackboxlogic (2020-10-13 22:26:30+00:00): I moved the business name from the driveway to their address, and added some more of their details.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92439793
aachso (2020-10-13 21:53:11+00:00): Regionalstelle* – den Ortsverband habe ich da gelassen, wo er war.
Kovoschiz (2020-10-14 12:21:52+00:00): Hi, this is actually something I would like to hve some discussions. In the past, or from casual simplicity, these are modeled with separate lines. Now that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762936333 has `turn:lanes=` and `change:lanes` together with a turning restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10583247), should this follow the classification of the only allowed movement from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762936332? I'm concerned if making it `=primary_link`  would look as if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762936336 can turn across.
aDSAT (2020-10-15 00:08:33+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz,

This is a very unique situation, and your reasoning is well-taken. Unfortunately, because OSM does not render turn restrictions, and also how it renders the overlapping highways in this area, it might always have the appearance that traffic already on Lung Wo Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762936336) would be able to exit here. Even at zoom level 17 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/22.28076/114.17059) the highways are blurred together, and a lot of the detail is unclear. Since the link in question is coming from a primary, OSM Wiki policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link#Link_roads_between_different_highways_types) suggests this would be a primary_link — although I’m sure it was not considering a circumstance such as this.

Thankfully the turn restriction is modeled well, and routing engines should avoid that maneuver (https://maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=22.281467&n2=114.170533&n3=18&a=22.282142,114.172797,22.281259,114.169943&b=1a&c=0&k1=en-US&k2=km).

Thanks,
aDSAT
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:16:51+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is GOOD.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92439872
(Inactive) RobinNoodles (2020-10-14 21:24:04+00:00): Thank you for reaching out!
Mike Baggaley (2020-12-29 14:05:53+00:00): Hi, in this change one of the alternate names for Cwm Degwel (Cwmdegwel) is also tagged as not:name. Can you please resolve the conflict?

Thanks,
Mike
Brian de Ford (2020-12-29 15:50:55+00:00): As far as I could determine, Cwmdegwel never was an alternate name for this road.  I messed up by adding it as an alternate.  Fixed now.
Carnildo (2020-10-14 21:11:02+00:00): In the southwest corner of this group of buildings, you've drawn what looks like a single large building in six separate parts.  Is there a reason for this?
Omnific (2020-10-14 22:30:54+00:00): Well, when I was check it from the Streetside imagery, it looked like each section of the River House condos was a separate unit, so I kinda guessed the shape so that eventually each could be addressed separately. Don't want to step on any toes here, so I went ahead and deleted it, and added a single outline.
Carnildo (2020-10-15 05:53:29+00:00): Generally the only reason to map individual units as separate outlines is if they're physically independent -- you could knock one down and the others would stay standing.  That's usually quite obvious from looking at the roof, and the roof of this building is just as clearly a single piece.  Addressing of individual units within a building can be handled just fine with address nodes.

A good example of the "physically independent" situation would be this section of Sprague: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.65705/-117.38177
skquinn (2020-10-14 05:20:36+00:00): Hi,

"Updates" is really no more useful than no changeset comment at all. What exactly did you update? That is the question that's supposed to be answered by a changeset comment.
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:16:25+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is GOOD.

Para este tipo de edificios te recomiendo usar building:retail
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92441788
eggie (2020-10-14 06:19:31+00:00): Dag LL,
Kleine aanpassing verricht. De info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
eggie
adrianojbr (2022-03-22 01:49:17+00:00): Olá, Victor 2015! Por que você incluiu hífen nome de algumas vias em Bombinhas, como por exemplo a Avenida Aroeira da Praia?

Tenho visto algumas placas com nomes de rua pelo Maillary (imagens recentes de fevereiro de 2022 e não há hífen em algumas dessas que você alterou, tais como Rua Jacatirão Açu, Rua Baleia Jubarte e Rua Mico Leão Dourado.
Victor 2015 (2022-03-22 02:17:57+00:00): Olá, Adriano! Eu incluí porque a escrita correta dos nomes de espécies é com hífen na realidade, talvez não tenha feito certo, mas na minha opinião, a prefeitura, o correio e as placas deviam prosseguir com a escrita seguindo as regras da nossa língua.
adrianojbr (2022-03-22 03:11:53+00:00): Pois bem, é boa prática do OSM se mapear conforme o terreno (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas) a fim de que seja possível verificar a informação por outros usuários. Assim, por mais que eutenda a concordar contigo sobre seguir as regras ortográficas, é melhor se mapear conforme o uso (placas, leis...) em name, e as grafias alternativas (inclusive a oficial) podem ser colocadas em alt_name (se houver mais de uma podem ser separadas por ponto-e-vírgula).
Frans S (2020-10-20 09:56:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Just 1 remark. Don't forget to square each rectangular building with the Q key.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92442202
freeExec (2020-10-14 08:18:58+00:00): Вы статью про name:lang читали? Как вы подтвердите, что все те иноземные люди знают все эти деревни в глубинке России под этими именами?
Или вы всё таки это всё выдумали?
GPMapper (2020-10-14 08:59:25+00:00): Здравствуйте Иван!
Раздел name:language_code не читал до сего момента, врать не буду.
 Принцип понятен, а я так старался :(
Все названия взяты из Википедии и гарантированно соответствуют реальным.
Проверенно (я уж надеюсь), Википедией.
freeExec (2020-10-14 09:13:57+00:00): В википедии автогенерация, чтобы хоть как нибудь.
GPMapper (2020-10-14 09:48:08+00:00): Названия взяты только из существующих статей, так что сомневаюсь что там все это автосгенерировано.
aweech (2020-10-14 02:00:44+00:00): Hi, 
This way that you added is a driveway in OSM terms because it just leads to a house. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway.
mshahaba (2020-10-14 07:07:20+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of tag. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mshahaba.
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:14:22+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD. Oneway=no tag is depreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92444857
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:14:39+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD. Oneway=no tag is depreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92444857
medrano93 (2020-10-15 00:13:05+00:00):   Thank you for reaching out. I did not add the oneway=no tag, I cut the road to add the name. I did not remove the oneway=no tag added by a past user because it is not necessarily wrong, just redundant. According to the wiki, "oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a oneway street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.)" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#oneway_.3D_no). Thank you again for reaching out.  
Gracias por comunicarte. No agregué la etiqueta oneway = no, corté la carretera para agregar el nombre. No eliminé la etiqueta oneway = no agregada por un usuario anterior porque no es necesariamente incorrecta, solo redundante. Según la wiki, "oneway = no se usa para confirmar que (una parte de) una calle NO es una calle de un solo sentido. (Úselo solo para evitar errores de mapeo en áreas donde, por ejemplo, las calles de un solo sentido son comunes, o para anular los valores predeterminados. ) "(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#oneway_.3D_no). Gracias nuevamente por contactarnos.
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:13:08+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD. Oneway key is depreciated. Please fix.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445240
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:13:30+00:00): Oneway tag is depreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445240