piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FrankXF (2017-11-15 22:06:08+00:00): Hallo Weltstaat, hatte gerade die Platformen aktualisiert. Du hast name und public_transport=platform entfernt. Damit alle Routen, die dranhängen nicht mehr korrekt. Und damit ist es keine gültige PT2 platform mehr. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRR_Tagging
Das mit der platform edge finde ich gut, aber bitte wieder korrigieren.
FrankXF (2017-11-15 22:14:13+00:00): Habe gesehen die Multipoligons haben jetzt public_transport=platform, das mach das Unterscheiden der beiden Gleise ziemlich schwierig. Da ist die platform edge besser.
Weltstaat (2017-11-16 08:21:04+00:00): Hallo FrankXF, der Nakaner hat mich vor einiger Zeit darauf hingewiesen, dass public_transport=platform nur in die Relation gehört und nur railway=platform_edge an die Kante direkt. Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244188
Deshalb habe ich so getagged. Ich kann den Namen auch wieder dranfügen, aber logischer erscheint es mir, wenn er in der Relation steht..
Nakaner (2017-11-16 10:07:22+00:00): @Weltstaat Bis auf zwei Flüchtigkeitsfehler (macht jeder) sehe ich hier nichts, worüber ich mich beschweren könnte. *Daumen hoch* Die Routenrelationen referenzieren jetzt alle das Multipolygon, welches die erforderlichen Tags hat (public_transport=platform, name=*, …). Nur die Stop-Area-Relation hast du vergessen. Sie referenziert noch die Ways. Und am Bahnsteig-Multipolygon fehlt noch das ref=*-Tag für die Gleisnummern (durch Semikolon getrennt).

@FrankXF Wenn ein Bahnsteig als Fläche erfasst ist, müssen railway=platform und public_transport=platform an der Fläche (hier dem Multipolygon) erfasst werden.

railway=platform_edge ist eine Erweiterung hierzu, um bei Insel- und Zwischenbahnsteigen angeben zu können, auf welcher Seite welche Gleisnummer ist.

Auch wenn railway=platform_edge in den Routen nicht referenziert ist (das wäre ja sonst keine valide Anwendung des PTv2-Schemas), ist eine Zuordnung zu den Gleisnummern möglich, da die Halteposition Mitglied der Routenrelation ist und an der Halteposition die Gleisnummer als local_ref=* erfasst ist.

Ich sollte mir doch mal die Zeit nehmen und ein Zeichnung machen, wie ich das schon für Bushaltestellen und Bahnhöfe gemacht habe.

Viele Grüße

Michael
FrankXF (2017-11-17 22:49:17+00:00): @Weltstaat: railway=platform_edge ist mir bisher noch nicht begegnet. Ist besser geeignet zur Unterscheidung der Bahnsteige. Danke für die Relationen. Stop-Area und Platform ist auch aktualisiert.
@Nakaner: Das Konzept ist schon klar. Die Linien, die jetzt platform_edge sind, waren schon länger da mit public_transport=platform. Hatte nur die PT2 tags und die Relationen vervollständigt. Habe schon viele Varianten gesehen (z.B. 2 Platform-Hälften), deswegen habe ich es so gelassen.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Zalitoar (2023-12-20 11:53:12+00:00): Según el Instituto Geográfico Nacional y OSSE (capa "Planta potabilizadora de agua") el nombre de la Planta Potabilizadora es Huaco y no Jáchal ¿Se puede confirmar?
FrankXF (2017-11-15 23:51:18+00:00): Hallo haytigran, danke, du hast die Relationen mit aktualisiert. habe railway=tram_stop wieder hinzugefügt. Alle Stops mit Schienen sollten es haben. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRR_Tagging
AgusQui (2018-01-08 16:56:55+00:00): tuve que revertir tus cambios, por favor ten mas cuidado la proxima vez.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:28:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
wambacher (2017-11-15 13:19:42+00:00): that is NO building, that is an AREA
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:05:32+00:00): Hello Salaamlogari!  Welcome to OSM! For a full list of potential Map Features please visit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features.  There is also a Dari version there!  Thanks for mapping
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
iWowik (2020-01-29 14:10:54+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=774441#p774441
Владимир К (2017-11-28 11:59:53+00:00): зачем вы отметили тут здание?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-14 17:58:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your changeset, because you paint building over buildings and the names seem very imaginative.

If this is wrong, I will help you to rebuild the change set.
3vivekb (2017-11-20 22:37:20+00:00): I think some of the names of things are still very wrong.  Tupac Shakur Memorial Parking Lot?  Really?
user_5359 (2017-11-21 19:04:13+00:00): Please see also the discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1208583
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-14 20:57:18+00:00): Actually the title is incomplete: this changeset is related with Pokémon sites, including #53360971
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-14 18:03:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the property https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187676141 ? I merge your information to the property.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-14 18:05:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a supermarket and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
AgusQui (2017-11-18 19:25:32+00:00): Hola Martina, ¿que es el poligono 3343 que mapeaste?
Martina Lewin (2017-11-21 18:08:36+00:00): Hola, Agus. Es el polígono que prevé la Ley 3343 para la urbanización de la Villa 31. Actualmente, debe agrandarse ese polígono, porque la ley es de 2009 y el barrio creció mucho.
AgusQui (2017-11-21 18:55:03+00:00): ah ok, entonces habría que borrarlo, porque en OSM se mapean cosas del mundo real actual, y esto sería el límite del barrio (creo) a futuro, en todo caso se mapearía una vez terminado o durante su construcción.
streinger (2017-11-15 08:07:18+00:00): что именно вы хотели добавить? что такое name:ru Сбербанк? это здание магазина.
SK53 (2023-03-29 12:05:14+00:00): I'd change the source to the EA site (the one added 404s): http://environment.data.gov.uk/bwq/profiles/profile.html?site=ukd1203-45700.

Given current level of pollution across England these might change too frequently for practical OSM use. See things like https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/oct/08/sewage-could-leave-windermere-lake-ecologically-dead
gurglypipe (2023-03-29 12:26:25+00:00): Sounds like a reasonable change, please go ahead and do so!

I’d completely forgotten I added this tagging, and don’t have a plan for updating it regularly. As you say, these things can change quickly, so if you think the tagging is better off removed, then I wouldn’t object.

If the water:quality tagging is removed, perhaps there’s scope for adding a ref:environment_agency=ukd1203-45700 or something like that instead, so the current bathing conditions can be looked up mechanically?

That also highlights the fact that the EA monitor several different bathing spots around Windermere and report them separately, so perhaps water:quality (or some reference ID) should be tagged for them separately rather than for the lake as a whole.
SK53 (2023-03-30 09:11:27+00:00): Came across this entirely by random. I think the thing to do is add the actual water monitoring station if location is known. This can then have the ref. I think I've mapped one air pollution monitoring location, and I know Andy (SomeoneElse) has been mapping flood monitoring gauges. I think this one is at Fell Foot.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-09 21:48:43+00:00): For info - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/diary/398374 describes the "is this path currently flooded" process.
The "currently flooded or not" status is in an external database, not in OSM.  I added a note to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753771968 , but that's just for info.
maraf24 (2017-11-14 17:48:42+00:00): "naprawa name:pl i innych tagów z nazwą"
GerdP (2017-11-15 08:02:12+00:00): Hi!
Please check highway="carrer de València"
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22725910
I assume you wanted to change the name
instead of the highway tag?
mateuvic (2017-11-15 11:26:46+00:00): oh! thanks. I will correct it
dgitto (2017-11-15 07:32:53+00:00): Per favore puoi usare dei commenti ai changeset un po' più esplicativi?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
Copa_g (2017-11-15 17:14:31+00:00): Inserito cancello a chiusura della strada.
Alecs01 (2017-11-17 19:26:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, the hotel in Rome was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2149698801 I deleted your entry
andrewwiseman (2019-05-06 15:55:45+00:00): Hi, what is this supposed to be? It is currently tagged as a Buddhist-Jehovah's Witness temple, which is not a thing
luiswoo (2017-11-15 05:27:11+00:00): А зачем двор исключен из землепользования? Это такая же жилая зона.
Alex_Enot (2017-11-15 06:07:34+00:00): Я так и не смог понять, почему он не попадает в отношение. Собственно, правку я для того и делал, чтобы включить здание и двор в жилой квартал. Но, видимо, моих знаний не хватило.
luiswoo (2017-11-15 06:39:55+00:00): Возможно что-то с мапником опять накрутили, сомневаюсь, что не отсортированные участники полигона этому причина — серая полоска на западе здания в наличии…
Alex_Enot (2017-11-15 06:59:50+00:00): Возможно. Эта серая полоса была и раньше. Ею всё землепользование и ограничивалось. Я посчитал, что это некорректно и поправил отношение так, чтобы в него входили здание и двор. Но визуально ничего не изменилось.

Раньше двор вообще был помечен как парк.
luiswoo (2017-11-15 07:38:58+00:00): Нет не ограничивалось http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2048141#map=19/47.22641/39.74429
Обновился мапник, двор стал опять серым, значит сортировка, возможно помогла — члены отношения сортировались, что-бы получить замкнутый контур. Если члены outer-а не представляют собой замкнутую линию\линии, то из-за этого иногда вылезают проблемы https://yadi.sk/i/FQsYfof53Pi7Tv
Alex_Enot (2017-11-15 11:30:15+00:00): Спасибо! Этого не знал.
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-15 10:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53798285 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user gursh, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53776915 for further information
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-15 10:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53798293 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user gursh, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53776915 for further information
Jan Westerhof (2017-11-14 23:34:03+00:00): Hallo Esther, weet je misschien of er vanaf het fietspad langs de Bennebroekerweg een oversteek is naar de Tijmweg?
Nu kun je met de fiets niet naar de Tijmweg navigeren, want de Bennebroekerweg heeft tag 'bicycle=no'.
Vr. gr. Jan Westerhof
luiswoo (2017-11-15 05:23:21+00:00): highway=road не учитывается при прокладке маршрута.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=road?uselang=ru
majid1359 (2017-11-14 19:46:23+00:00): شاتل تصحیح شود
majid1359 (2017-11-14 19:50:32+00:00): تغییرات شاتل تصحیح شد
PT-53 (2017-11-15 08:35:32+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
ich habe Deine neuen Gebäude überarbeitet, teilweise sind ja bereits in Maps4BW enthalten. Bei Gebäuden, die noch nicht in Maps4BW oder in den Luftbildern enthalten sind, empfiehlt es sich die Gebäude per Schritt-Anzahl vor Ort auszumessen. So wie ich das sehe, waren die beiden Gebäude viel zu groß.
Bitte zeichne Gebäude, die rechtwinklig sind auch rechtwinklig ein. In JOSM kann man das mit der Taste (Shortcut) M machen (Gebäudeumriß markieren und m drücken).
Wenn man Maps4BW verwendet, ist es pflicht das auch in den source-Angaben zu nennen. Bitte lies das nochmal im Wiki nach.
Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-02 15:19:42+00:00): zerkniesz na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1255541 ?
Luzandro (2019-08-17 07:14:47+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du dir bitte diesen Hinweis ansehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1837314

Danke
TBKMrt (2019-08-17 20:23:31+00:00): Erledigt
wambacher (2017-11-15 13:43:05+00:00): Hi, hast du das immer noch nicht verstanden, wie das Löschen funktioniert?

du machst immer noch den gleichen fehler und ich muss dir dann hinterherputzen :(

abgesehen davon, dass das Löschen an sich schon nicht ok ist, weiol man Relationen ändern soll und nicht einfach neue rels erzeugt. damit wird die History gelöscht und das wird bei OSM überhaupt nicht gerne gesehen.

werde wohl bald mal mit der DWG sprechen müssen.
turankaya74 (2017-11-15 14:22:26+00:00): Die Daten stammen von der Behörde, noch genauer können die Daten nicht sein. Ich lösche mit dem Entfernen Symbol
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
marc__marc (2026-02-11 07:46:41+00:00): Hello,
I have improved tag for it.
leaf_type=broadleaved
taxon=Arecaceae
taxon:wikidata=Q14080
taxon:en=Palm
feel free to ajust the location 
Regards,
Marc
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
R0bst3r (2017-11-15 08:58:08+00:00): Hallo _Bolero_,
deine jüngsten Änderungen haben die Lage der neuen Kreisel "korrigiert", wenn du die öffentlichen GPS Spuren von mir und anderen Mappern aktivierst, siehst du, dass es davor besser war. Auch vor Ort würde sich dies bestätigen.
Ich würde wenn es für dich ok ist, diese Änderung revertieren?!
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2017-11-16 08:57:35+00:00): Revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53833306
Bitte ggf. deine Änderungswünsche nochmals prüfen, Danke!
Glassman (2017-11-14 22:34:55+00:00): Trailheads can be tagged on the trail. I went ahead and made the change. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/trailhead - It's still in proposal status, but over 500 trailheads have been added to the OSM.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Alecs01 (2017-11-17 19:17:12+00:00): Hi, this was already on the map, see: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3991747194 I deleted your entry
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
valerietheblonde (2017-11-15 21:31:46+00:00): I checked out the other side today and it has a ~3" hole in it - must be a bird box of some kind
BCNorwich (2017-11-15 07:25:11+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your addition to the OSM database is very good. I noticed the Esri aerial imagery is more recent than Bing so I tweaked the position slightly. Also added a few service roads on the estate from Esri.
It would be great if you could add speed limits, I know that's really needed by a lot of map users. 
If you want any help/advise with any thing please just ask, the OSM community is very friendly in general.
Regards Bernard
Denis Venidiktov (2017-11-16 18:47:13+00:00): 288587575, v2
Вроде дома нет на снимке, надо смотреть в живую. Убрал его
Glassman (2017-11-14 23:46:33+00:00): We use full spellings of street names in OSM to avoid any confusion that software has trying to unabbreviate the name.
Glassman (2017-11-14 23:47:47+00:00): You can draw a area around the development, tag it as landuse=residential and then add a name. Otherwise your node will not show up on the rendered map.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-11-16 06:16:43+00:00): Hey, 
Your changes made to disappear the floating bridge. Can you pls be careful while you edit major tags like highway = motorway and other roads. I will add those back again. 
Thank you!
LeifRasmussen (2017-11-16 20:21:01+00:00): What exactly did I delete?  I wanted to update the alignment of the Evergreen Point Floating Bridge, since it has had construction recently.  I used the lifecycle prefix to make sure I didn't completely delete the old bridge. Thank you!
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
fantasiasango (2018-06-06 22:28:10+00:00): I did not remember why I did this. It would be great if someone would help undo/fix the change.
frosm (2017-11-14 23:29:07+00:00): Bonsoir,
bienvenu sur osm et merci pour votre contribution.
cependant celle-ci est erronée :
"7 rue de marivaux" n'est pas un nom mais une adresse à mettre dans les champs d'adresse.
vous avez position un noeud au 113 rue saint-martin
raito (2017-11-15 03:10:25+00:00): Hello team56. Wow, so many tourism viewpoints along the road. Are they really worth a visit? Cheers!
rene78 (2019-08-26 07:42:19+00:00): No. Reverted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-09 19:53:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196400874 - zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3217576 ?
naoliv (2017-11-15 01:41:06+00:00): John, por favor, há vários usuários lhe enviando comentários e você não respondeu nenhum deles.
É importante que existe comunicação entre os mapeadores, principalmente quando envolve alguma dúvida ou questão relacionados à forma que se está mapeando.
smaprs (2017-11-15 01:57:44+00:00): Por favor, responda aos contatos. Há informações importantes que lhe foram enviadas.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-08-16 10:19:18+00:00): I think these rivers go the other way, I've changed the directions
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-08-16 09:21:34+00:00): kind of a square and weird wetland. 🙂 It's not wrong, but maybe do you wanna spruce it up to make it more “natural”?
nevw (2017-11-15 14:41:22+00:00): The usual method is to not delete the ways but to add access=no or access=private tags to the ways
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:06:43+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。


編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features


台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/


Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-12-02 03:35:41+00:00): 亮島不是中國噢，請別動台灣控制的地方
Supaplex (2017-12-02 03:45:27+00:00): 還有金門也不是中國控制，請不要動到
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-19 05:51:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5229466999/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?