piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-24 09:18:52+00:00): G'day BlueishWater3, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In regards to the carpark you have added, this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7081758112 has been tagged with amenity=parking however it is part of the carpark area that you have made (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758294597). I would suggest removing the amenity=parking from the node as the area has the tags already.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
BlueishWater3 (2019-12-24 10:02:17+00:00): Thank you! These are my first edits. I made a change to the node as suggested, hopefully that's fixed the problem.

Cheers
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-24 11:53:21+00:00): I checked the edit and everything looks good! If you have any questions you can reach out as well.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
user_5359 (2019-12-24 12:02:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
gscscnd (2019-12-24 08:55:19+00:00): Jeżeli zmieniasz nazwę drogi, to musisz ją zmienić (tag addr:street) także na wszystkich punktach adresowych, np. <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6794361891>.

Jeżeli na tabliczce z nazwą ulicy jest napisane „J. Długosza”, ale wiadomo (np. z dokumentów urzędowych lub z „lokalnej wiedzy”), że jest to ulica Jana Długosza, to na OpenStreetMap powinna być opisana jako „Jana Długosza”. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic>.
l3BAM (2019-12-29 16:57:45+00:00): Bonjour. Vous avez passé la hauteur de l'antenne https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5288149376/ de 42 m que j'avais mise à 40 m. Pourtant https://www.cartoradio.fr/index.html#/cartographie/all/lonlat/-0.812997/47.585256 indique 45 m pour la partie la plus haute. Quelle est votre source ?
Sawan Shariar (2019-12-24 08:35:20+00:00): Modify building shape using assign imagery and added features 千葉県富津市の建物入力 #hotosm-project-6742 #DRONEBIRD #FuruhasiLab #CrisisMappersJAPAN #MissingMaps #BHOOT
ACarlotti (2019-12-24 13:38:25+00:00): In the imagery this looks like a vehicle routes within a temporary A14 works compound. Since the works at this location are complete, have you got any evidence that there is still a compound there, and that the vehicle routes match this layout? I would expect that it is already being restored to farmland.
◪ Jarv (2019-12-24 21:56:42+00:00): This one I can confirm is still accessible for construction vehicles, however attached to the southern roundabout of intercahnge
priymose (2019-12-31 08:05:12+00:00): Hi Acarlotti & Thomas Jarvis,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Please let me know if any changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
priymose.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 11:01:02+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=ra-men
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220287424/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=ramen
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
muramototomoya (2020-01-30 11:29:07+00:00): 法華堂跡の階段の上にあるお墓(historic=tomb)をこの変更セットで削除されたようですが、これはお墓ではないのでしょうか？
参考写真：https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Y98Jfs9WvQnr4NgBUwgcTw
(なおデータが削除されたことに気づかず、先日再度データを作成してしまいました)
user_5359 (2019-12-25 17:41:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die K 4328 hat nicht einen Name sondern eine Refernzenummer (ref) K 4328, siehe auch die L 346 https://www.osm.org/way/99546062. Könntest Du dies bitte anpassen?
Sawan Shariar (2019-12-24 08:35:05+00:00): Modify building shape using assign imagery and added features 千葉県富津市の建物入力 #hotosm-project-6742 #DRONEBIRD #FuruhasiLab #CrisisMappersJAPAN #MissingMaps #BHOOT
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-25 00:52:49+00:00): Additional source: Department of Education, CY 2013 Public Schools Masterlist
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-24 18:49:41+00:00): hello, can you explain why you deleted this? the surface clearly said peebles.
DerMario (2019-12-25 18:46:47+00:00): Hello,
yes I can. I deleted the way because he doesn't exist at all. Pebblestones are a kind of surface. If you have a look in the Wiki of OSM you find, that they have a maximum of 8 cm (english wiki) or 5 cm (german wiki). But there is no way where somebody has put the pebblestones at the coast.
The rule is: Map only the reality. The day before yesterday I would like to go this way and was not amuses to see, that I have to go over the stones. There were 4 or 5 m waves and at one corner the surf was crashing against the rock so I had to return and couldn't pass "the way".
If you think, that it would necessary to have a closed hiking trail, than you can add the way again. But I think, it is not correct.
Best Regards, Mario
DerMario (2019-12-25 18:50:40+00:00): And additionally: Would you add a way at every beach because you can walk at every sandy beach in the world? Please decide...
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-25 19:01:08+00:00): not every beach is walkable. here's couple evidence https://www.facebook.com/225065020957893/photos/a.1286302501500801/1286303631500688/?type=3&theater
https://pt.wikiloc.com/trilhas-outdoor/vereda-do-pesqueiro-ponta-do-pargo-14919894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBKauAEfV94
DerMario (2019-12-25 19:16:57+00:00): I don't need a proof. I am sure, that usually you can walk this trail (not last Monday) and he is really nice. But definitively there is not created a way. Nevermind, I am only a tourist and will not come back. So, if you need this way, add it again or revert my changeset, no problem for me!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-25 19:18:50+00:00): no worries Mario, I will adjust the data as in ruff sea conditions it might be indeed dangerous to do. hope you enjoyed Madeira and that OSM data was useful during your stay.
DerMario (2019-12-25 21:05:05+00:00): Yes I still enjoy the island. And without OSM data I would not know, how to move and hike on the island ;-). I also changed other data, e.g. a wrong one-way street, so that I can route to my hotel in Santa Cruz :-)
Warin61 (2019-12-27 07:40:11+00:00): Hi,
What is 'ECan imagery'?
ralley (2020-01-02 19:28:33+00:00): Environment Canterbury - https://ecan.govt.nz/
Warin61 (2020-01-03 05:06:10+00:00): Ummm 
https://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/
Website visitors may reproduce, store and use the content of this website for personal, informational and non-commercial purposes only. Otherwise, no portion of the content of the website, including text, graphics, photos and the Council logo, may be copied or used without the written permission of the Council.

I don't see it on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Data_Catalogue

So I think this is a copyright breach.
Warin61 (2020-01-03 05:13:19+00:00): Err 
That looks to be copyright... and there looks to be no waiver.
See
https://apps.canterburymaps.govt.nz/canterburyMaps/TermsandConditions.pdf
https://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Data_Catalogue

As balcoath has failed to respond and is mapping I'll let the DWG know.
balcoath (2020-01-06 20:44:44+00:00): Warin61: I did not respond because I did not see your messages until today. As you know, it's a busy time of year. ECan's imagery is published as a web service under CC BY 3.0 NZ---I had thought that that was sufficient permission but I've since been made aware that it may not be in itself. I'll stop using the imagery.
Warin61 (2020-01-06 22:28:14+00:00): All the things copied from that source need to be removed. They cannot be left in OSM. I suggest you cease other activities untill that is completed.
balcoath (2020-01-06 23:19:02+00:00): I'm sure you'll kindly tell me how to do that too.
Warin61 (2020-01-07 05:38:25+00:00): My tool of choice for undoing my own (it happens) ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
aharvey (2020-01-13 03:59:04+00:00): I've sent a waiver request to ECAN to ask for imagery tracing permission, but let's not expect that. balcoath it looks like you've reverted your affected changesets, did you manage to do them all without issues? Let me know if you still need a hand.
Moving forward, let's hope ECAN are responsive and provide us permission, if they do we can start using it as a source.
balcoath (2020-01-13 20:25:16+00:00): That's excellent, thanks. Yes, I've reverted my changesets. I had trouble resolving conflicts with a couple of the earlier ones, mostly because I'm never sure how to do it well. Looking at the map, though, I don't see any glaring problems with the geometries.
aharvey (2020-01-22 22:18:32+00:00): After approaching Environment Canterbury they have agreed to the OSM tracining waiver https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ to allow OSM to trace from their aerial imagery.

Their permission form at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:EnvironmentCanterbury_AerialimagerywaiversfortracingforOpenStreetMap.pdf

This only covers the Imagery layer https://gisbasemap.ecan.govt.nz/arcgis/rest/services/Imagery/MapServer and https://gisbasemap.ecan.govt.nz/arcgis/rest/services/Imagery/Imagery_basemap_WGS84_4/MapServer
balcoath (2020-01-22 22:24:30+00:00): That's awesome, thanks for doing that. Now, a silly question: can I un-revert some of my reverted changesets?
Warin61 (2020-01-22 22:43:56+00:00): Not a silly question at all. Think a legal eagle would be required... and I think the answer will be no :( 
Good luck.
aharvey (2020-01-23 01:55:51+00:00): @balcoath you can revert the revert changeset. Ideally this would be done in the right order so they can smoothly applied assuming no other changes have been made. Now that we have the imagery tracing waiver from ECan I see no reason why data derived from the imagery can't be used now.

See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2020/000187.html the ECan imagery is ingested by LINZ so which we do have the layer in OSM for, but ECan can be more recent as it takes time for LINZ to update their mosaic.
balcoath (2020-01-23 02:16:18+00:00): Yes, I'll have to have a think about which reverts I could safely revert. I know other users have made changes in some of the areas I previously mapped.

Yep, I'm aware that ECan pass their imagery to LINZ, and there is certainly a lag. There is quite a bit of development going on at the moment in the area I've been mapping. One reason why ECan's service was attractive in the first place!
angys (2020-01-08 11:51:46+00:00): Hello, I think Boni/Pioneer is for bus stop name, not metro station map, if you are local mapper and upadte this because that metro station change its name, can you provide a source for it, thank you.
DP24PH (2020-02-04 12:12:34+00:00): Unfortunately, the insider source for Manila MRT Line 3 and Bus stop (upon survey) will now follow the standardisation suit for Boni/Pioneer since the MRT management have changed the signages inside the platform that says, "Boni/Pioneer". Hopefully, this will help you a lot.

Tip: You may take note of the station names within the platform via smartphone, then revise if necessary.
skquinn (2020-08-11 22:17:31+00:00): When changing a highway to one way (adding oneway=yes) please double check the lane counts and remove any tags such as lanes:forward, lanes:backward, turn:lanes:forward, turn:lanes:backward, etc that indicate attributes of the road segment when it carried two-way traffic. Unfortunately, you will have to look at the tags each time you do this as iD does not currently show lane counts and lane use (unlike JOSM which can be set up to do so).
shadty (2020-08-12 09:01:16+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your inputs and edits. This is a miss from our end, we are currently considering your inputs in our editing process and also using JOSM for re-modelling roads. Thanks again and apologies for our miss.
Regards,
shadty
PT-53 (2019-12-24 09:20:52+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758318615/history
eingezeichnet und als "Fußweg" klassifiziert.
Ist Fahrradfahren dort ausdrücklich verboten? Falls nicht, wäre path die passendere Klassifikation.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Weihnachtliche Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-13 11:56:43+00:00): erledigt
rskedgell (2019-12-24 11:46:21+00:00): Hi, many thanks for mapping these and all the rest of your mapping around Greenwich. I'm surprised they hadn't already been mapped.

However, unless they have been changed recently, they are mandatory cycle lanes marked by a solid white line (TSRGD diagram 1049B) together with an the upright blue sign (diagram 959.1). They're not shared lanes with motor vehicles as it is an offence contrary to s. 36 RTA 1988 to drive in one.

I would be inclined to tag this as cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:left:lane=exclusive instead. The second tag is optional and less widely used, but I use it to distinguish it from an advisory cycle lane (marked by a broken white line, to which I would add cycleway:left:lane=advisory).

OSM Wiki entry for cycle lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_lanes

Mapillary imagery of part of the cycle lane from April 2017
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/A6j9d7B5vyn9XXi79sbr6Q

Official reference for the lane markings and upright traffic signs, Schedule 9 TSRGD 2016
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/9/made#schedule-9-part-4
WASD42 (2019-12-24 17:50:59+00:00): Hi rskedgell,


Thanks for the kind words, I am just updating my neighbourhood but am not too familiar with the rules and approaches used in the UK yet :)

You're absolutely right, I will update the lanes tags shortly.
eggie (2019-12-24 10:16:00+00:00): moped=designated dus..
Dat betekent "aangewezen". 

yes.. dan mag het designated.. dan moet het.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:36:45+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=noodle
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:39:05+00:00): other way - have you meant to use cuisine=noodle on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3039140125 ?
Hervé TUC (2024-01-31 20:48:36+00:00): Hey!
It was 4 years ago so I don't remember that restaurant precisely.
But this tag exists, there's almost 8000 occurences :)
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=cuisine%3Dnoodle#tags
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 05:03:44+00:00): Yes and cuisine=noodle; is there now (with extra ; sign at the end)

Would it be safe to retag it?
Hervé TUC (2024-02-28 15:09:28+00:00): Sorry for the very late reply
I corrected this

Happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2019-12-24 16:00:00+00:00): 1. `historic=yes` on its own is incorrect. 
2. Why don't you make use `place=quarter` or `place=neighborhood`?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78813309
woodpeck (2019-12-24 16:19:21+00:00): Perhaps it would make sense to use old_name=something?
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-26 07:55:37+00:00): Hallo mtb-odw, bitte keine Straßenverläufe nach Bing zurechtschieben. Das Bing-Luftbild ist leider alles andere als lagegenau.
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-25 10:53:32+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server.
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78843940

#revert
#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
literan (2019-12-24 20:53:47+00:00): корректный формат номеров домов описан здесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr - сверяйтесь хотя бы с номером, который на самом доме стоит.
Asumarin (2019-12-26 11:46:55+00:00): пардон, буду внимательнее
IlBano (2020-01-04 17:56:29+00:00): Ciao francians,

volevo segnalarti che l'uscita dalla rotatoria verso Via Mattalia non sarebbe corretto mapparla come secondary visto che mi sembra sia solo d'ausilio all'accesso al gruppo di case in prossimità dello svincolo.
Vedo che si connette ad una strada classificata come track proviente dalla SP23 più a sud. Questa, oltre ad apparire apparentemente asfaltata (immagini aeree e Mapillary) e non compacted, sembrerebbe più una residential nel tratto SP23 fino alla curva a 90 e almeno fino alla fine dell'area residenziale. Nel tal caso il relativo svincolo dalla nuova rotatoria sarebbe anch'esso residential. Avendo fatto un survey in loco magari riesci a fornire qualche elemento in più in merito.

Grazie

Ciao
francians (2020-01-04 18:09:58+00:00): Ciao,

lo svincolo è nuovo ed asfaltato, si congiunge alla vecchia strada che non ho toccato in quanto, a memoria, non è asfaltata... Per me ok, cambiare la strada nuova in residential. Farò un giro per verificare la situazione della vecchia strada nei prossimi giorni.
Leo Slager (2019-12-24 14:11:26+00:00): Top !
Met 35 busroutes in deze changeset en alle beschadigde routes zijn zelf hersteld.
Dat is een prestatie die ervaren mappers slechts zelden halen !
Nogmaals mijn complimenten.
JeroenHoek (2020-01-05 09:02:53+00:00): In principe zijn N-wegen met de nummers tot N400 altijd primary, tenzij ze daadwerkelijk die rol verloren hebben. Dat lijkt hier niet het geval te zijn. Zou je deze herclassificatie kunnen toelichten op het forum?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68368
JeroenHoek (2020-01-05 09:04:25+00:00): Zie ook: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
Leo Slager (2019-12-24 14:15:04+00:00): Prima, geen fouten aangetroffen in de routerelaties.
eggie (2019-12-25 09:45:22+00:00): Gemeente Utrecht,
Svp toch nog een keer reageren op vragen van de OSM Community
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=772768#p772768
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-12-25 16:47:32+00:00): Hello! For a better description of your object please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater  (see https://www.osm.org/way/758346547)
mavl (2019-12-30 15:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79019169 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3355].
mueschel (2021-11-01 19:44:35+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here - many objects you added are duplicates of other, older objects. E.g.
This: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758353459
is a duplicate of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82468615

Could you check the 160 objects from this changeset for such duplicates and remove them?
Wulf4096 (2019-12-24 14:11:01+00:00): Hallo,

ist fee=no korrekt, kann man da wirklich kostenlos aufladen?
Parkgebühren werden laut Wiki mit "parking:fee=yes/no" getaggt, falls das gemeint war.

Frohe Feiertage!
look4book (2020-01-01 16:37:16+00:00): Es gibt einen einfachen Startbutton, ohne vorherige Authentifizierung. Ladung konnte ich mangels Akku nicht testen.. Wird nachgeholt
michalfabik (2020-09-18 19:02:57+00:00): Pozdrav, izbrisao si ovu prugu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463753849/history  
  
Znam da izgleda čudno jer nije povezana ni sa kakvim drugim prugama, ali pruga stvarno treba da bude tu. Radi se o šinskoj stazi bagera za pretovar uglja na depou goriva za termoelektranu: https://tehnopetrol.ba/montaza-kombinovanog-uredaja-na-depou-uglja-1-u-te-tuzla-600-tona. Kolosjek ima širinu 7500 milimetara, a pokretna traka vodi sredinom između šina i ispod bagera, zato se linije u OSM-u poklapaju.  
(Ovo znam pouzdano jer sam lično radio na montaži bagera:))  
  
Sad ću probati da obnovim izbrisano.
Badojo (2020-09-18 19:12:53+00:00): A dobro toga se baš ne sjećam. Malo je bilo davno :)
skyper (2022-03-10 12:21:07+00:00): Hallo Akkurator
Die Werte für `turn:lanes` sehen zum Teil merkwürdig aus. Z.B. `through;left|left` in der Meersburger Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292979751/history). Kannst Du Deine Änderungen diesbezüglich bitte noch einmal überprüfen, danke

Viele Grüße,
skyper

P.S.: iD ist für das Spurtagging nicht gerade gut geeignet. JOSM mit den eigens dafür gemachten zusätzlichen Kartenstilen und Vorlagen ist da wesentlich komfortabler.
Akkurator (2022-03-10 15:19:51+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
danke für den Hinweis.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292979751
Das müsste natürlich turn:lanes=left|left;through sein, außerdem nur ab der Einfahrt ca. in der Mitte, weil dort erst die Richtungsmarkierungen beginnen.

Außerdem dürfen jetzt Linienbusse auf der rechten Spur auch rechts in die Olgastr. abbiegen Richtung Hirschgraben. Ob  man das aber unbedingt taggen muss? Hat für die Allgemeinheit keine Relevanz und Linienbusfahrer lassen sich sicher nicht OSM-basiert routen...

Ich korrigiere die lanes auf der Meersburger Str jetzt aber nicht, um deinem Revert hier nicht in die Quere zu kommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118257620
Kannst hier Bescheid geben, wenn der Revert durch ist.

Welche lanes findest du sonst noch merkwürdig? Ich hab' auf die Schnellle keine gefunden dort.

Grüße,
Akkurator
skyper (2022-03-10 15:50:59+00:00): Hey Akkurator
Ich habe jetzt nicht direkt nach falschen Werten gesucht. Die beiden Teile der Meersburger Straße sind mir nur aufgefallen.
`turn:lanes` bezieht sich in erster Linie auf die aufgemalten Pfeile und hat mit Abbiegebeschränkungen nichts zu tun. Wird an dieser Kreuzung wohl alles durch `oneway=yes` geklärt.

Zum Revert: Der ist sofort gemacht, allerdings wollte ich noch auf eine Antwort von "ChrisFromRV" warten.
Die Werte kann ich dabei gerne gleich miterledigen.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-03-11 00:27:49+00:00): So habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118343756 mit korrigiert und gleich mal eine Linie weiterverwenden können. Sollte jetzt stimmen.
Grüße skyper
eggie (2019-12-24 13:17:44+00:00): Dag Ramon.. Het is natuurlijk de vraag of je alle parkeermogelijkheden als volwaardig parkeerterrein moet zien.. laat staan mappen. Beetje twijfelgeval hier.
Bedenk even "Iemand zoekt een parkeerterrein". Hier?
Je krijgt een wijk vol P's op de kaart.
Andere manieren om parkeermogelijkheid te taggen (de insteekvakken)  is door de tagging in de hoofdrijbaan op te nemen.
met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
Dus parking:lane:both=perpendicular 
(on the right hand side you can park perpendicularly.)
Up to you!
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-12-24 13:19:30+00:00): De uitleg aalleen rechts.. vandaar eigenlijk both.
Bij de sportterreinen is natuurlijk wel een parkeerplaats.
De straat Bongweg kun je hier als residential taggen ipv unclassified.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 17:36:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bei Öffnungszeiten ist nicht nur interessant, dass der Campingplatz geöffent ist, sondern auch, von wann bis wann der Platz tagsüber geöffnet ist.
Treuekarte (2019-12-25 18:38:15+00:00): Hallo user,
Es handelt sich um einen Reisemobilstellplatz. Der hat immer auf. Ausser vom 10.1. bis 28.2. Näheres hier:
https://www.tourismus-treuchtlingen.de/poi/reisemobil-stellplatz_am_kurpa-1850/
user_5359 (2019-12-25 19:03:37+00:00): Hallo, laut der jetzt gelieferten (und zu treffendere Webseite) ist die Anmeldung nicht immer sondern von 6:00-20:00 möglich. Ich werde diese demnächst ändern....
Treuekarte (2019-12-25 20:09:23+00:00): Habe die Webseite aktualisiert. Die Öffnungszeiten habe ich gelassen. Du hattest nicht nach den Öffnungszeiten der Anmeldung gefragt, diese haben nicht direkt mit den Öffnungszeiten des Stellplatzes zu tun und befinden sich außerdem an einem anderen Ort.
pio2_122 (2019-12-24 13:08:27+00:00): Mam prośbę, staraj się nie ingerować w granice podczas dodawania dróg, np. poprzez łączenie dróg z granicami.
W tym przypadku chodzi mi o https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/45032903
Awizonosz (2019-12-24 13:13:52+00:00): Postaram się jak mogę nie dotykać granic
pio2_122 (2019-12-24 13:20:27+00:00): Dzięki :)
BCNorwich (2019-12-26 15:06:19+00:00): Hi, your fiction has been removed. If you need help adding genuine features please just ask.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 16:50:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.  Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name (see https://www.osm.org/node/7082363841), have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.