piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-12-08 15:06:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A small remark. When buildings are partly hidden by trees, please map the (hidden) rooflines rather than the treelines.
Best regards
LeonRS (2020-12-08 16:42:41+00:00): I will take note of that. Thank you!
Frans S (2020-12-22 15:12:34+00:00): Hello.. Thanks for mapping on this task
Please pay more attention on accurate and squared mapping. (Q key)
Also do not connect nodes of buildings to eachother or to  other objects.
See my PM with general info.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-26 11:22:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please do not map clusters of buildings and call them 1 building.
Frans S (2020-12-03 11:24:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please do not map residential areas as they are no part of the instructions.
These include mostly bigger areas (not just a block of buildings) and needs to be mapped outside this project.
letihu (2021-01-30 20:46:48+00:00): Was könnte denn
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871538471/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871538470/history#map=19/52.43731/8.62567&layers=N
wohl sein?
letihu (2021-01-30 20:53:39+00:00): Dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871538473/history#map=19/52.43733/8.62586&layers=N
ist auch ohne tags nutzlos.
BCNorwich (2020-11-14 09:25:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to say pretty good mapping. Also to mention that some tags are implied by their absence, covered=no and oneway=no are examples that are not usually needed as when absent they are implied.

I squared up the buildings in your other changesets and tweaked Paverly Court areas.

I hope this is OK, Regards Bernard.
jonorossi (2020-11-16 05:50:27+00:00): I've found it very common for Courts to have street numbers in sequence like that rather than odd one side even the other.
dle0 (2020-11-26 12:39:10+00:00): I was confused by the sign which I think uses lot numbers. there is a standard AS/NZS 4819 for even odd numbering. I think I'll wait until there are actual houses with visible numbers there...
jonorossi (2020-11-26 13:19:34+00:00): Fair enough, lot numbers are definitely common before council has allocated street names and numbers.

It's always funny to see real estate advertisements for 123 New Street.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-24 06:07:31+00:00): Why you removed building tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808859225/history ?
mariotomo (2020-11-16 14:46:00+00:00): hola.  es MUY útil en particular uno de los campos que pusiste, "outdoor_seating", por la situación de la pandemia en que vivimos.  será que puedes hacerlo para más restaurantes?  tanto el "yes" como el "no" son muy relevantes!
tastrax (2020-11-18 22:03:03+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
jonorossi (2020-11-16 06:17:10+00:00): Great work. Nice to see Ethel Street fixed up, I had planned to go back into that street since last time running along the old embankment because I could see there was a proper street in there.

Regarding your change from highway=track to path, I tagged it track because it is like a rail trail or fire road (or "forest track" as per wiki), suitable for a 2 track vehicle even if only council is allowed to use it for maintenance now (the reason for motor_vehicle=no) since trains don't use it. I'd like to understand the change as it appears I've tagged it wrong.

Thanks, Jono
dle0 (2020-11-26 12:20:35+00:00): hi Jono... I walked most of the length and it seemed  by bollards and lift gates that the embankment once was for vehicle traffic but it is now *looks* just for foot and bike.... that's what I tried to capture in the tags.

I suppose you're right that council vehicles could drive down it for maintenance the same way they do down concrete footpaths.

hmmmm so the more I think about it, I think you have something there about vehicles but I too am unsure how to represent that. please correct it as you see fit.
jonorossi (2020-11-26 13:43:29+00:00): It wasn't vehicle traffic, the embankment used to hold the Cleveland train line before it was rebuilt in the 70s or 80s to newer standards where they needed more gradual curves, you can see the old concrete abutment and concrete pillar in the middle of the lake. There is also a historic plaque with the info.

Personally I see the difference here vs a concrete footpath is most concrete footpaths are only around 1.2m wide, not enough for a motor vehicle, RTV doesn't count :), their purpose is as a footpath. This one physically is capable of a dual track motor vehicle even though motor vehicles are prohibited for you and I. Track being higher up the highway hierarchy than footway, like cycleway is higher than footway. Fire roads in your local nature reserve are exactly the same, council maintenance and fire trucks can physically use it as a dual track vehicle, but access tags say we residents aren't allowed to do the same.

Thanks for the discussion, I'm always trying to learn, tagging definitely isn't cut and dry. I've restored/upgraded it to highway=track.
dle0 (2020-11-27 21:33:52+00:00): yeah, it's a supremely interesting structure, isn't it; I love visiting places like that.

I mean I know that the embankment used to be the rail line, and I could see that after the rail lines were removed there's evidence vehicles drove on it a lot. But to me the bollards indicate an intent for foot and bike, and that the vehicle access was short-term and is now unusual. I recognise that you interpret it differently: as a well-developed vehicular track that is now mainly foot/bike traffic. I'm happy with that and will leave it alone.
Glassman (2020-11-14 18:10:56+00:00): It appears the address node from the building 11600 was moved to the Lakeshore building which has an address of 11448. The original address nodes appear to be correct. Can you correct this? Let me know if you need help. 

Also you changeset comment indicated a taco truck but it wasn't added. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94095764
jonorossi (2020-11-16 06:06:47+00:00): I didn't add the node, but I can understand why Rob added it a year ago. The wiki says "A place where tourists, visitors, hikers might like to visit and take photographs", and I think that spot does qualify under those guidelines. Our coastline has a lot of good viewpoints, but do you feel it doesn't qualify? I think it is definitely the most accessible viewpoint in the GS Wetlands.
dle0 (2020-11-26 12:34:59+00:00): I was excited when I saw that viewpoint and spent about an hour walking around looking for it. I was looking for a mound or elevated position with evidence of visitors. The closest was the tire stack overlooking the flats, but ... no one point in particular stood out.

The greater area is certainly photogenic but I felt that there wasn't a single viewpoint.
jonorossi (2020-11-26 13:16:52+00:00): Haha, an hour looking, that's commitment. I'm happy to leave it deleted, there are so many "viewpoints" along our shoreline, probably best to only mark the commonly visited ones. Thanks.
Gregory UKR (2020-11-14 19:06:46+00:00): Хтось більш досвідчений тут мабуть висловиться по іншому, але моя думка наступна. Перше, якщо є стежка, то позначати її треба. Друге, якщо є обмеження на пересування цією стежкою, то вказувати їх треба. Трете, як саме прокладається маршрут, залежить від конкретного програмного продукту та опцій, які можливо має змогу обрати користувач. Щодо стежки через залізницю, в Україні існує адміністративна відповідальність за прохід по залізничних коліях у невстановлених місцях. Можливо хтось скаже що кількість тих хто отримав такий штраф порівняно з кількістю тих хто переходить колію найкоротшим шляхом настільки мізерна, що не варта уваги. Можливо інший скаже що за все життя за перехід колії в цьому місці ще нікого не оштрафували, отже обмеження як такого фактично немає. Але моя думка, коли ми маємо справу з ситуаціями де щось заборонене але фактично використовується, то варто все ж таки вказувати наявність обмежень. Скажу навіть так, якщо навігатор радить комусь довший але легальний шлях, то можливо він не так і неправий, і він слушно пропонує людині обрати довший життєвий шлях ;)
Wolyk (2020-11-14 20:22:09+00:00): Ви праві, але люди там роками ходять і часто доводиться пояснювати знайомим, малюючі на скріншотах) Очевидним є, що людина не буде йти зайві двадцять хвилин для того, щоб дійти до переїзду.
abakus_uploader (2020-11-14 23:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tastrax (2020-11-18 21:58:58+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
lyctkel (2022-07-07 10:25:31+00:00): Hi Ukrainian spy,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660814516 which uses building=industrialqrr.
This tag is only used here.
From my point of view building=industrial would fit better.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
lyctkel
map per (2020-12-06 15:24:10+00:00): Hello aytfadc,

cutting=yes doesn't apply to this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136991743)
Yours
map per
KartoGrapHiti (2022-01-07 15:01:41+00:00): Bitte lösche nicht einfach das Attribut cycleway=opposite nur weil es in einer Straße keinen Radweg gibt. cycleway=opposite bedeutet, dass die Einbahnstraße OHNE RADWEG in Gegenrichtung befahren werden darf.
amnmalik (2020-12-21 20:30:18+00:00): Are you sure about the peak name? On the survey map, I see the name Kedarnath.
ravald03 (2020-12-22 07:29:12+00:00): Yes this is Thalkedar peak in the Pithoragarh district in Kumaun region of Uttarakhand.

On the other hand, Kedarnath is a famous Hindu pilgrimage in the Rudraprayag district in the Garhwal region and almost 170 kms Northwest from this point (Thalkedar).
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:50:02+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GOwin (2022-05-01 00:45:24+00:00): It's awesome that you added these buildings.

Do you know that #MapWithAI is available in the Philippines, and complement your mapping, and take advantage of Artificial Intelligence detections to add buildings more quickly?

Try it out: https://mapwith.ai/rapid
mueschel (2020-11-15 09:36:39+00:00): Hi,
please stop importing data from unknown sources. All the nodes don't have any valid tag and many nonsensical ones like
unnamed=0
unnamed_2=0
unnamed_3=0
unnamed_4=0
unnamed_5=0

It's necessary that you follow the OSM Import Guidelines.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2020-11-14 08:02:51+00:00): Dag TNC  Elk begin is moeilijk en je bedoeling is vast goed.
noexit=yes hoort aan het eind van een pad waar verder geen verbinding is met een ander pad.
Wanneer er echt een stukje pad ontbreekt kun je het pad loskoppelen en op de eindnode (van doodlopende weg dus) de tag noexit=yes zetten.
Kijk je nog even? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94097300

Nu is er nog steeds een verbinding en zal het routeren. noexit=yes taggen we voor de duidelijkheid.
Dus is er wel of geen verbinding?.. Dat moet duidelijk worden. 

Mapse,
eggie
TNC_ (2020-11-16 11:00:12+00:00): Zou zo in orde moeten zijn.
Gino-52 (2022-03-09 19:15:11+00:00): Hallo user_5359,
Du hast bei diesem Änderungssatz u.a. in Aulendiebach bei der Bushaltestelle Gisteler Straße den Tag soure:ele=gpx hinzugefügt.
JOSM sagt mir jetzt das ein soure:ele ohne ele unsinnig ist. Das kann ich auch nachvollziehen.
Ich habe den soure:ele Tag gelöscht. Solltest Du für die Bushaltestelle noch eine ele-Tag einfügen kannst Du auch den soure:ele wieder hinzufügen.
Viele Grüße
Norbert
user_5359 (2022-03-09 20:43:07+00:00): Hallo Norbert, da habe ich wohl eine massive Vermischung von zwei Fehlerkorrekturen produziert. Ich muss mir das mal genauer ansehen, ob der behobene Fehler die einzige Problematik (neben dem über große Changeset Bereich) war. Ich danke auf jeden Fall für die Korrektur.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen 

Georg V.
Ars-UA (2020-11-14 08:32:12+00:00): Забор уже убрали.
Ars-UA (2020-11-14 08:35:00+00:00): Возле Reikartz поперёк дороги стоит старый фургон, из за которого нельзя проехать. Всё остальное открыто.
Ars-UA (2020-11-14 08:36:15+00:00): Я поправил.
Andre68 (2020-11-14 11:23:04+00:00): You (again) created overlapping coastlines... And WHY did you delete the island relation for Idö? And WHY did you again placed a "place=island" on the line for "Brunnskär" (it is already in the relation!)? And WHY "area=yes"??? It's useless! Please LEARN! Or stop editing...
felipeeugenio (2020-11-22 15:56:08+00:00): not a service street. Please take a look at the meaning of the tags in the wiki. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice)
regards
Fischkopp0815 (2020-11-14 10:12:04+00:00): Hier gibt es noch einen zweiten POI. Noch vorhanden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2038446476
blockki (2020-11-14 10:58:08+00:00): Moin, Nein und ist auch gelöscht
literan (2020-11-14 12:05:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8118042019/history#map=19/55.75393/37.62995 тут действительно общедоступная прачечная, можно прийти постирать одежду?
S Kudryashov (2020-11-14 20:04:44+00:00): Нет, не общедоступная. Ближайший общедоступный пункт приема - Б.Черкасский 13
literan (2020-11-15 10:45:22+00:00): а тогда что тут расположено?
S Kudryashov (2020-11-16 05:12:39+00:00): Расположена-то прачечная, но Ипатьевский пер. перекрыт, нужен пропуск.
literan (2020-12-09 09:55:03+00:00): добавил access=private
Warin61 (2021-01-22 00:56:40+00:00): Parking relation 11890414 deleted - add noting to the already tagged ways.
eggie (2020-11-14 10:05:40+00:00): Beste Creator.. Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken.
Er zijn al adresnodes. 
Er mag natuurlijk veel in OSM, maar om nu een naam toe te voegen name=Pet Grave animal=cat lijkt mke niet gebruikelijk in OSM.
Realiseer je de kaart wereldwijd in gebruik is zelfs bij officiële overheids- en hulpinstanties. Graag verwijderen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-14 10:49:27+00:00): Adres inmiddels verwijderd..
Baloo Uriza (2021-07-16 21:26:20+00:00): Yeah, no, Exchange doesn't connect through anymore, hasn't in years.
eggie (2020-11-14 10:07:13+00:00): Je kunt ook voor dit soort toevoegingen een eigen layer gebruiken.
Persoonlijke notes horen niet in OSM thuis.
Graag reactie,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-14 10:12:58+00:00): Zie http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/ voor eigen layer in OSM
eggie (2020-11-14 13:12:59+00:00): Beste T. 
Hoe serieus bedoeld ook .. ik heb je tagging verwijderd. Het gaat in tegen de conventie van OSM tav persoonlijke info. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-14 14:45:19+00:00): Toulouse heeft wel het forum van OSM gehaald https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=808314#p808314
渤海西岸 (2020-11-16 04:23:05+00:00): 弘驰都会的汉堡王关了，搬到银泰城了
Nordseeküstenradweg (2020-11-14 09:57:31+00:00): Sorry, die Begründung ist natürlich Quatsch.
BCNorwich (2020-11-14 13:13:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Actually White Farm Lane and School Lane are private roads,  access=private indicates that the road is not to be used by the general public. Although services and visitors use the roads there is no stated permissive access. There is designated access on foot on School Lane an on White Farm Lane as far as School Lane. There is informal access (which could be termed permissive) from school Lane east on White Farm Lane to a footpath linking to Henby Way. 

Regards Bernard.
twinkliest (2020-11-14 14:47:56+00:00): OK, I'm a bit confused about how to tag these then - although they're privately owned, the wiki has this entry:

Note that access=private records that access is restricted, not whether or not the object is privately owned. Use ownership=private or operator:type=private to record this kind of status. Privately owned road with public access may be tagged like any other road with public access - without access=* tag, or with the explicit access=permissive.

Although there are a lot of shouty signs about Pinebanks and the old schools, the road is privately owned but seems to be publicly accessible, just like Rockland Drive and Lime Tree Avenue (where I live) next door - nobody is manning the gates or granting individual permission - and should presumably be tagged accordingly? Either that or these roads should also be tagged private? Is it only considered different *because* of the shouty signs? It seems to me it has a lot *more* cause to be marked accessible, certainly along as far as School Lane and School Lane itself, what with being a public footpath.

I wanted to change this because I'm using StreetFerret to try and run every road in Thorpe and it annoyed me that White Farm Lane wasn't on the list :D Forgive my ignorance, I don't want to break anything unnecessarily!
literan (2020-11-14 12:02:04+00:00): не забывайте старое название в тег old_name добавлять, пожалуйста
superkiria (2020-11-15 07:44:39+00:00): Спасибо, добавил old_name.
user_8722718 (2020-11-14 10:31:58+00:00): 🙄
Vinber (2020-11-14 12:06:06+00:00): Please be careful it's a big changesets, between italia and england ?

and it's hard to understand what you do when you add opening_hours:covid19=restricted for example : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61741481/history#map=16/51.6051/-1.2241
user_3961358 (2020-11-14 15:26:46+00:00): No, I was wrong.
pyrog (2021-03-13 08:36:15+00:00): Salut

Merci d'avoir corrigé le tag wikimedia_commons de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8007937185/history :)

Tu as oublié le préfixe "File:" ;)

A+

Yves

PS: je corrige ce type d'erreur avec un script
Sukkoria (2021-03-15 18:24:14+00:00): Hello, 
Merci d’être repassé pour vérifier, je note pour le "File:" à ne pas oublier !

À bientôt ;)
pyrog (2021-03-16 07:00:25+00:00): Il y a un bouton dans iD qui permet de vérifier si la valeur est bonne.

Dans JOSM c'est click droit et "Voir l'image sur Wikimedia Commons".

A+
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-11-15 23:04:44+00:00): Hey,

Sinds kort hebben we een tool om gebouwen van het GRB te (helpen) importeren - maar het vereist wat kennis en setup. Kom eens langs op onze chat om te horen hoe het werkt: https://app.element.io/#/room/#osmbe-grb:matrix.org
Arma IRM-ED (2020-11-30 00:11:38+00:00): Hi, SCHlumpsF. I have modified these roads (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/871582248,
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/871582247) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
yannikh (2021-01-12 10:06:51+00:00): Hey bianca_pereira! I've noticed that some pedestrian/car routing software is having trouble on Headford Road because of the barrier=kerb tags which intersect the road/pavements. I've tried to improve this by (1) re-tagging the barrier=kerbs in the middle of the road as highway=crossing and crossing:island=yes, and (2) separating out the barrier=kerbs along the pavements so that travellers who can't handle kerbs can still pass along the pavement (but not cross the road).

This seems to be the advice on the wiki for crossings, under the kerb entry (which has an excellent diagram): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing

If you strongly disagree with those changes then feel free to undo them, but I think barrier=kerb nodes should not generally be in the middle of a road/pavement unless the kerb actually impedes travel.
bianca_pereira (2021-01-25 12:42:00+00:00): Hi yannikh, Thanks a lot for pointing this issue out to me and for performing the changes. I understand now how it can influence the navigation from a routing perspective. Really appreciated!
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-14 11:28:01+00:00): Hey there,

Try to add a descriptive summary to your changesets. This helps other contributors understand what you want to do.
Something like "added landuse" is fine.
frosm (2020-11-14 11:24:07+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour votre contribution
n'hésitez pas à ajouter que c'est un lieu de culte.
le nom de rue me parait aussi étrange, vous avez visiblement décalé les informations d'un champs.
bonne continuation :-)
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-03 04:47:15+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez ajouté un doublon sous forme de point de cette église : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188769617#map=19/4.36995/18.57768
Si vous souhaitez ajouter des informations, utilisez ce qui existe déja. Donc svp, on retire le doublon et on ajoute les données complémentaires si il y en a à l'église.
De plus vous faites référence à une photo (quelle licence sur la photo ?) dans la description, lien qui ne fonctionne pas d'ailleurs.
Bonne journée
Dounda R Innocent (2020-12-06 15:45:18+00:00): bien reçu.
geronet (2020-11-16 06:12:15+00:00): Der Windstierlkopf befindet sich schon weiter westlich auf der Karte, bei diesem Punkt gibt es keinen Gipfel mit Namen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94102727
naveenpf (2020-11-15 15:08:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94102762
eggie (2020-11-14 12:54:56+00:00): Dag Jan.. 
Je vraag om een review.
Dit is correct gegaan. Je hebt de weg verplaatst zonder de routerelaties te schaden. Er lopen hier fietsroutes. 
Kijk svp ook naar de andere changesets, want niet alles is goed gegaan. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Janboot73/history#map=3/33.10/2.92
MVG,
eggie
A67-A67 (2020-11-15 16:31:23+00:00): Heb je de slinger uit de weg gehaald omdat deze tijdelijk is, of omdat deze niet meer bestaat op dit moment? 

In het eerste geval was de slinger correct. We mappen namelijk de huidige situatie. Tijdelijke situaties kunnen, zeker bij langdurige werkzaamheden, gewoon in kaart worden gebracht. Zie ook de rest van de A16 Rotterdam.
Janboot73 (2020-11-15 17:59:24+00:00): de slinger is waarschijnlijk de tijdelijke situatie geweest. de originele situatie is nu weer hersteld. De rechte weg is de goede, originele en toekomstige situatie.
A67-A67 (2020-11-15 19:17:59+00:00): Bedankt! Dan klopt het zo.