piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 13:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book.  See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be verified).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-01 17:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107272257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism around Armenia / Azerbaijan.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-July/086696.html .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-01 17:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107272257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism around Armenia / Azerbaijan.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-July/086696.html .
sorcrosc (2017-09-21 17:51:28+00:00): Le aree che stai disegnando sono tremende. I percorsi che dovrebbero delimitare le foreste non coincidono affatto con i confini della vegetazione. Non ti preoccupi di escludere dalle relazioni le parti interne con altri tipi di terreno ed includi interi paesi come se fosse tutto bosco.
Non sembra neanche che tu sappia bene come funzionano le relazioni visto che hai lasciato multipoligoni aperti creando una grande confusione che sarà complicato sistemare.
In generale la qualità del tuo lavoro non mi sembra affatto sufficiente. Si nota chiaramente una certa frenesia di "colorare alla buona"
Lola Fox (2017-09-22 12:08:58+00:00): Si, è vero. Vedendo che la zona è prevalentemente scoperta, ho pensato di "abbozzarla" creando grandi aree (prevalentemente foreste, poichè trattasi di montagne appenniniche) e in un secondo tempo rifinirla con le aree interne specifiche. Ma se la politica dei piccoli passi, precisi e dettagliati è da preferirsi a quella dei grandi passi abbozzati da rifinire in un secondo tempo, mi adatto senza problemi. Resta solo da sapere cosa suggerisci: lascio così oppure cancello?
dgitto (2017-09-23 08:49:57+00:00): Cancella. Sì, è da preferire la prima che hai detto. Anzi, dell'altra politica non si è mai sentito parlare:  tracciare una strada abbozzata e poi rifinirla è un doppio lavoro.
sorcrosc (2017-09-23 10:19:30+00:00): Concordo. Vedo ben poco di salvabile in questa modifica.
Grazie.
Lola Fox (2017-09-23 16:13:29+00:00): Ok. Cmq preciso che non si trattava di strade abbozzate e poi rifinite, ma di aree. Cmq altri vostri eventuali consigli/critiche/suggerimenti sono sempre ben accetti, perchè mi rendo conto che ho ancora tanto da imparare.
Xv Zan (2018-01-23 21:40:21+00:00): 请不要瞎画不存在的道路
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:40:31+00:00): Hello StenSoft. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308445462 you have tagged `sort`. What is it for? Is it a misspelling only? #newkey
NyanSten (2017-09-22 09:57:07+00:00): Hello, it should be `sorting_name`. Thank you for noticing.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-09-21 11:10:33+00:00): Hi jmjm26, please fix the empty relation below. a relation needs a type with usefull value, AND other tags to specify the relation. Thanks, Alex
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:41:28+00:00): Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109723260 you have tagged `sourcex` instead of `source`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 07:08:30+00:00): Hello Kleper. At all the relations you have added `highway-path=Camino`. Did you mean the `name` instead? #newkey #typo
Kleper (2017-09-22 07:12:57+00:00): Hello, Sorry for this issue. These changes are being added by a community native to Colombia. We are doing some workshops and this week we will correct all these errors. Thanks.
Kleper (2017-09-22 07:17:55+00:00): I mean. A group of people from an indigenous community.
NieWnen (2025-04-21 19:34:40+00:00): https://pdait.pl/o-nas

Na stronie PDA IT jest napisane:

> Przez 10 lat dynamicznie działaliśmy jako firma KwiatNET.

Rozumiem, że tutaj ta firma już nie istnieje?

Jeśli tak to zachęcam do usunięcia i dodania aktualnej w nowym miejscu.
eggie (2017-09-20 15:47:01+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-20 15:54:02+00:00): Parallelvoetpaden worden in de regel niet getagd.... behalve als er een groenstrook tussen zit. fotway=sidewalk is een bug in editor iD. dat moet er af.
De aansluiting aan de zuidzijde naar de Kerkstraat is een beetje wonderlijk. Klopt dat?
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-09-20 15:56:30+00:00): Goede edit, maar....
De tag footway=sidewalk graag weghalen. Die hoort er niet bij. 
Haal je die zelf weg? Graag reactie.
user_5359 (2017-09-20 18:39:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Is the greater buildung really a shop for houseware (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhouseware) or more a private residential building?
SomeoneElse (2017-09-21 22:50:22+00:00): Erm - you perhaps ought to have a read of the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories in the OSM wiki :)
hanzlan (2017-09-22 08:44:54+00:00): Oh ok, well I haven't started with the european road network relation, which is already quite big. Ok, then group it as you wish :)
user_5359 (2017-09-20 18:42:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

we don’t register any car, but we register car sharing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_sharing)
GinaroZ (2017-09-20 15:35:02+00:00): Hi, not sure if you are aware but this area has some newer DG Imagery if you want to add the proper building and car park area.
Stonemill1 (2017-09-20 15:39:54+00:00): Nope, not aware. I am now....
canfe (2019-03-29 14:54:30+00:00): 
Corretto orari di apertura.
Consiglio di usare per editarli
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:18:05+00:00): Hello Antikruk. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2788680002 you have tagged `name:ru` with a linebreak character. Please review it. #typo
raito (2017-09-21 02:51:57+00:00): FIXED in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52231346
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:31:34+00:00): Hello SlowRider. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5117657851 you have tagged  `potable_water` which is a new (and so far unkown) key. Do you mean `drinking_water` instead?` Please have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinking_water #newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:37:44+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352334446 hast du `siedewalk` anstatt `sidewalk` getaggt, richtig? ;-) #typo
Protoxenus (2017-09-22 07:37:23+00:00): Ich finde es gut, wenn man auf Fehler hingewiesen wird (denn wer macht keine), aber wäre es nicht effizienter, wenn du oder derjenige, der den Fehler bemerkt, ihn gleich ändert, wenn es eindeutig ist?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 07:54:09+00:00): wenn ich eines bei osm gelernt habe, dann dass es nichts "eindeutiges" gibt. im gegensatz zu anderen maße ich mir aber eben nicht an in fremden gebieten ohne ortskenntnis solche auf dem ersten blick lapidare fehler zu beheben. da könnten ja eventuell auch noch andere fehler vorliegen, z.B. logische, usw.
PS: ich habe es früher mal gemacht, aber nachdem ich die quittung dafür in keepright, osmose, osminspector und co bekommen habe, weil ich der "letzte" bearbeiter war, lasse ich das einfach ;-)
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-20 15:55:00+00:00): Vielen Dank! Das ist schon sehr viel besser. Was jetzt noch nicht stimmt, ist das placement-Tagging und stellenweise die Fahrspuren, da setz ich mich heute abend mal ran. Ich habe auch seit drei Stunden eine neue Version dieser Kreuzung im Editor, aber du warst schneller mit Hochladen, lassen wir deine stehen :)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:45:44+00:00): Hello fdjrgio. In this changeset you tagged some substations additionally with `src:addr`, instead of `source:addr`, right? #typo
literan (2017-09-22 17:16:58+00:00): прекратите заливать мусор
Svalbard (2017-09-20 16:27:41+00:00): Hello,

are you sure, that this is a building?

It is quite large and overlaps with the road.
Bing does not show a building there.

Please correct your edit.

Thank you very much!

Svalbard
dgitto (2017-09-23 11:11:10+00:00): Ciao, in effetti si perde l'informazione del nome del ponte. Che ne dici di usare "bridge:name"? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
è adatto proprio per specificare il nome del ponte quando la key name è già usata per il nome della strada. Oppure meglio ancora usare lo schema recente di disegnare il ponte come oggetto separato 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
anche se per ora lo utilizzano sui ponti più importanti
MCalaOSM (2017-09-23 13:13:16+00:00): Ciao già secondo me si appena posso gli do un okkiata al viki e correggo.....quando o letto la delibera infettivamente ci avevo pensato e mi sembrava strano.  Ciao
arvdk (2017-12-14 14:14:26+00:00): There is a question about your maxspeed=0 tag. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1176930
arvdk (2017-12-21 06:24:41+00:00): Since you have not replied, this issue is resolved by deleting that tag.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 05:51:43+00:00): Hello Procrastigator. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220744382 you have tagged `cocktaiks` instead of `cocktails`, right? ;-) #typo
Procrastigator (2017-10-04 19:10:41+00:00): Indeed, thanks for the correction! :)
pyram (2017-09-20 17:35:37+00:00): Hallo juesi65,

zum Ausprobieren gibt es auch eine Kopie der Daten. Siehe
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Sandbox_for_editing
bzw.
https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/51.495/-3.296

Man kann da ungezwungen mit dem Editor herumprobieren, das Ergebnis wird dort aber nicht gerendert (d. h. es erscheint nicht auf der Karte).
arvdk (2017-12-14 14:18:12+00:00): Hi, is this street really called "Entenbachweg 16"? If it's only the driveway of number 16, please use highway=service & service=driveway. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:36:53+00:00): Hello chaemassey. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8936699 you have tagged `sideawalk` instead of `sidewalk`, right?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:15:04+00:00): Hallo Linie29. Sollte es bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526233146 nur `maxspeed` (also ohne Doppelpunkt) werden, oder fehlt da noch ein `forward`/`backward`? #typo
Linie29 (2017-09-22 06:32:37+00:00): Hallo! Danke für den Hinweis. Den Fehler mit dem überschüssigen Doppelpunkt habe ich nun korrigiert. mfG
Alan (2017-09-22 02:32:03+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

The water polygon seems to be an error, though. I'm going to delete it.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:21:24+00:00): Hello Wladyslaw Komorek. In this changeset you have introduced some new (and so far unkown and undocumented) uppercase keys. Do you really need them? Are they really public data?
Władysław Komorek (2017-09-22 07:49:01+00:00): It was just a test.
I will remove it.
user_3022894 (2017-09-25 13:38:13+00:00): Hallo User/-in Norbosm,
du hast hier einen straßenbegleitenden Radweg eingezeichnet, der von der Straße nicht baulich abgesetzt ist. Der Radweg befindet sich auf der Fahrbahn und wird daher nicht als eigener Weg, sondern mit dem Attribut cycleway=* an der Straße kartiert. Ich empfehle dir, dazu die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Stra.C3.9Fenbegleitende_Wege durchzulesen.
Gruß,
Lukas
user_3022894 (2017-10-02 19:38:13+00:00): Ich habe den Weg jetzt gelöscht und durch cycleway=lane an der Straße ersetzt. Das ist gleichwertig und entspricht der anerkannten Mapping-Praxis.
j-wills (2017-09-21 05:38:02+00:00): Что делают автобусные остановки внутри дома ?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:06:26+00:00): Hello quattroporte. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526248393 you have tagged `fence:type` instead of `fence_type`, right? Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afence_type 
#typo
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:23+00:00): Olá, Eldro.
Nesta sua edição você criou 11 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:59+00:00): Olá, Eldro.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:10+00:00): Olá, Eldro.
Nesta sua edição você criou 12 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
jaap de vries (2017-09-21 06:30:47+00:00): Ik heb de bestaande poi en die jij hebt bijgewerkt even samengevoegd. Ook heb ik even de naam volledig gemaakt.
Let je ook even op dat je aangeeft wat je hebt gedaan? Nu staat er " (geen reactie) " .
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:16:20+00:00): Hallo gd-wg. Sollte es bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132031323 anstatt `mtb:a=scale` vielleicht ein `mtb:scale=...` werden? #typo
gd-wg (2017-09-22 17:59:51+00:00): ja.
Alecs01 (2017-09-22 15:34:02+00:00): I believe there cannot be a chalet there, reverted, please pay attention on what you're doing
Svalbard (2017-09-20 18:24:52+00:00): Hallo blaubaer11,

bist Du sicher, dass STD-xxxx der Name des Rettungspunktes ist und nicht die Referenz, die Du mit xxxx angegeben hast?

M. E. haben die Rettungspunkte eher keinen Namen, sondern die Aufschrift auf dem Schild ist die Referenz.

In Niedersachsen steht das Autokennzeichen des Gebietes, in dem der Rettungspunkt steht, zusätzlich auf dem Schild.

Siehe auch das deutsche Wiki zum Rettungspunkt:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point

Du könntest im Zweifel auch einmal bei DD1GJ nachfragen. Er beschäftigt sich ziemlich umfassend mit Rettungspunkten in Deutschland.

Gruß

Svalbard
imperialmog (2017-09-20 18:28:33+00:00): I think i was editing some of the same things as you were at the same time, so there may be some odd conflicts that popped up.
PT-53 (2017-09-28 08:30:47+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
keep right moniert bei diesem Weg ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526252642 ) die fehlenden Tags.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
Peter
kreuzschnabel (2018-06-26 20:31:54+00:00): In diesem Edit wurde der Leitungsmast http://osm.org/node/250489567 280 Meter nach Osten geschoben. Wird repariert. Bitte aufpassen :)
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 01:22:38+00:00): Hi, FYI adding access=no does not have any effect on a footway that has foot=yes because the foot tag overrides the access one. If you need to show the footpath as closed, you need to change the other access tags, rather than add access=no. Can you please review your change?

Cheers,
Mike
drnoble (2017-10-29 12:06:16+00:00): Thanks Mike, I assume you mean for routing foot=yes overrides access=no. Are you suggesting that I should change the bicycle=yes and foot=yes tags? Should these also be set to no, or removed?
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 15:10:24+00:00): Yes foot=* overrides access=*. If the path is closed, and is going to be for quite some time, then I would not add the access tag at all, but would change the foot and bicycle tags to no, and add a note to say this is a temporary closure and giving some idea of the reopening date. Alternatively, there is a proposal for temporary access at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional) . Not sure how widespread the temporary prefix usage is.

Regards,
Mike
user_5359 (2017-09-20 19:15:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete these three buildings?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 13:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book.  See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be verified).
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-09-21 10:33:42+00:00): 'Avenida de Portugal' is what the road used to be called when Angola was under the administration of Portuguese government, the name of the road is not considered an alternative name
MandyMoslow (2017-09-21 16:36:24+00:00): Thank you for the explanation, I have fixed the tags for Avenida de Lisboa to be old_name again.
adrianojbr (2017-09-21 00:49:56+00:00): olá, gabriel. seja bem vindo à comunidade de mapeadores do openstreetmap.org. quanto às suas edições, elas são muito úteis. para estarem no padrão do osm, aviso que não se deve abreviar os nomes de nada. a regra é usar por extenso. também não sei qual a fonte que você tem usado para inserir nomes nas vias. sugiro que uso os mapas oficiais do município, que podem ser encontrados em: http://www.brusque.sc.gov.br/ibplan/web/mapas.php

além disso, no comentário das alterações que você fez, seria interessante colocar algo mais específico para identificar para outros mapeadores como, nesse caso, "nomes de vias" indica melhor que "atualização área brusque", pois quase todo mapeamento é uma atualização e brusque se identifica pelo local onde foram feitas as alterações.

se precisar de ajuda com mapeamento, avisa aí.

abraço.
mavl (2017-09-25 17:23:39+00:00): Hello Gabriel iTer. Did you use the data of Google Maps?
naoliv (2017-09-26 22:55:28+00:00): @mavl, see the changeset's source at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52395827
source=Google
mavl (2017-09-27 04:04:37+00:00): @naoliv, thank you for this link.
mavl (2017-09-27 10:16:11+00:00): Dear Gabriel iTer. You used the data of Google. OpenStreetMap project does not store the copyrighted data. I'so sorry but your data of this changeset are deleted. Please, read the article [1]. Don't copy other maps in the future.  
  
(traducción automática)  
  
Gabriel iTer. Usaste los datos de Google. El proyecto OpenStreetMap no almacena los datos protegidos por derechos de autor. Lo siento, pero los datos de este conjunto de cambios se eliminan. Por favor, lea el artículo [1]. No copie otros mapas en el futuro.  
  
1. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes
smaprs (2017-09-27 15:00:32+00:00): Gabriel iTer, só completando a informação enviada, em português / Just completing information, now in portuguese:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Perguntas_frequentes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-01 17:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107272257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism around Armenia / Azerbaijan.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-July/086696.html .
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-30 13:45:49+00:00): Hello,
It would be helpful to tag the guideposts that you added with the correct tag.  I'm not sure what the guideposts look like in this area, so I don't know which tag to select.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aguidepost
isolationism (2019-07-30 13:54:14+00:00): All of Ottawa's greenbelt trails are marked with standard markers:

https://pixodesigncanada.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/greenbelt-signtypes.jpg

These would appear to have the following attributes according to the link sent:

guidepost=hiking
guide_type=numbered
location=pole
height=full
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-30 14:20:10+00:00): Thanks.
Added this info (using height = 2.6m)
orhygine (2017-09-22 20:11:03+00:00): Thanks for contributing. H
orhygine (2017-09-22 20:11:39+00:00): Have you seen that path on Bing imagery ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526263489/history#map=19/18.84147/-98.65722
aceman444 (2020-10-29 21:11:43+00:00): Zdravim, tie ocislovane domy ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58538894 to maju fakt nazov, alebo je to adresa/cislo domu?
Mirecnet (2020-10-29 21:31:12+00:00): Nie, su to cisla domov. Treba to opravit a doplnit podla KAPOR udajov. Tie cisla su len pre spravnost, ci je vsetko OK.
aceman444 (2022-04-13 19:46:25+00:00): Ok, zda sa, ze uz to upratal Dodko.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:07:34+00:00): Hello fedc. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526264528 you have tagged `ga` instead of `gauge`, right? Please have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gauge #typo
İsmət_S (2021-07-01 18:25:36+00:00): Are you crazy? This my village which I live here at the moment. Do you know where is Armenia? 300km away from here. I haven't done anything wrong. I support openstreetmap and I am trying to make it more correct. I have changed  names of Azerbaijan cities and it's vandalism? Have you searched anything about it at least on the Internet? You has reverted all of my jobs without researching anything.

This is VANDALISM.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-01 19:12:52+00:00): I'm more than happy to undo changes where they were valid - but as I said on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107272257 your deletion of valid entries elsewhere cast doubt on all your changes.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-01 19:19:12+00:00): I've restored these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107276459 , and also squared them up by pressing "q" before uploading.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-09-22 20:07:32+00:00): Esta edição causou uma deformação no mapa
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:28:48+00:00): Hello John Grubb. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399202468 you have tagged two POIs (post_office and shop) in one osm element, but you should use one feature one osm element. E.g. Anyone would search for post_office:opening_hours.
John Grubb (2017-10-21 17:31:33+00:00): It is because the PO is also a shop, but the shop part is open for different hours to the PO counter. As the shop is open for the longer hours the solution is to make the building outline the shop and the PO a node within the outline, which I have done.
Rom1 (2017-09-21 06:53:30+00:00): Bonjour, stp, pas de nom tout en majuscules. Merci.
Glassman (2017-09-20 23:29:47+00:00): Does the Ghost Note Coffee actually charge a fee for internet access?
4004 (2017-09-23 22:28:49+00:00): Спасибо за правку и вклад в осм.
Если адрес вы проверили лично/взяли из надежного источника, то все отлично.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 05:41:44+00:00): Hello brianboru. With this changeset you have introduced some new (and so far unkown and undocumented) keys at some toilets: `automatic_public_convenience` and `radar_key_needed`. For the second one could it be also a http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centralkey ? #newkey
brianboru (2017-09-22 15:54:19+00:00): Hi Thanks for your input, This is the data supplied by the local authority, which I retagged according to the wiki except for these two tags which the wiki didn't address- - hence the new tags. The key attribute I note is only a proposed key and radar is a better known term AFAIK than nks in the UK
seichter (2017-09-21 07:49:35+00:00): Brettach hat nicht PLZ von Neuenstadt.
(Betrifft 2 Häuser im Lilienweg)
Joachim Müller (2017-09-21 14:35:32+00:00): Kann nicht nachvollziehen, was das Problem ist. Wenn Du es besser weißt, dann korrigiere doch bitte das Problem einfach
seichter (2017-09-21 16:00:25+00:00): Ist korrigiert, war nur ein Hinweis.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 06:46:33+00:00): Hello RicoElectrico. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5118154068 you have tagged `Storm=Optyk Jordan`. Should it be the `name`? #newkey
RicoElectrico (2017-09-22 06:48:05+00:00): It should be name=Storm ;)
eggie (2017-09-21 05:54:01+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd