piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2016-03-29 22:57:54+00:00): Hi,
You've changed the tags on the Dren train station building to remove the name:sr and name:sr-Latn tags, as well as adding name:sq and changing name to the Albanian name.

As this document describes:

http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf

OpenStreetMap tries to follow the "On The Ground" rule - if the majority of people in an area refer to it as "Name A" instead of "Name B", then it should be referred to within OSM as "Name A" (though of course other language names can co-exist, and all communities are free to make their own maps from OSM data using whatever name they choose).

I'd expect many if not most places in Kosovo to have both "name:sq" and "name:sr" names for the Albanian and Serbian names respectively.  In places where Albanian is the most-spoken language (the majority of the country) I'd expect the "name" tag to match "name:sq", so the "name" of Prishtinë is Prishtinë rather than Приштина (but there is a name:sr tag set to Приштина).
In places where the majority language is Serbian I'd expect the "name" to match the name:sr.  
I'm assuming that Dren is majority Serbian based on the demographics in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leposavi%C4%87 .
Please do get in touch if there's anything that I don't understand here.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
marcknj (2016-03-29 23:04:59+00:00): Hey­
You're right­
I might have made a mistake ­
The Cities and other names should mainl­y be Albanian (because of the Albanian r­ep of Kosovo) and then the tag name:Sr c­an be added. But the first name should b­e Albanian

I'm sorry that I made a mistake­
SomeoneElse (2016-03-29 23:31:33+00:00): Hi,
I'd expect the name in most places to be in Albanian, but in municipalities where there's a Serbian majority, such as here, I'd expect it to be in Serbian.
However, I may be wrong - if the station building is actually mostly called "Stacioni i trenit Dren" regardless of the most-used local language, that's what it's name in OSM should be.
Best Regards,
Andy
marcknj (2016-03-30 12:08:05+00:00): I agree
But it should not be on Cyrillic because then Albanians and other people wouldn't understand it

Greetings
M
SomeoneElse (2016-04-01 07:05:12+00:00): Thanks - that's a good point.
The tag "name:sr-Latn" seems to be used for Serbian-written-with-latin-characters locally, like on the station itself http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1845292809 .
Fabe56 (2023-06-07 15:18:01+00:00): Hi Denis001,
Those names attached to the benches are a little bit strange, can you confirm them?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3647631
SomeoneElse (2016-09-04 21:58:14+00:00): Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405736593 is "building=sho".  I'm guessing that that's a typo for something, but what?
SpillerC (2016-09-05 09:17:04+00:00): Whoops! combination of mis-typing and over-reliance on auto-complete. Thanks for pointing it out
PT-53 (2016-03-26 10:21:26+00:00): P-Weg war teilweise doppelt eingezeichnet.
Fehler behoben
Karteneditierer (2016-03-26 13:32:48+00:00): Vielen Dank.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
PT-53 (2016-03-26 10:10:56+00:00): Wege auf dem Parkplatz werden nicht mit driveway sondern mit parking_aisle gekennzeichnet. Auch hat ein Parkplatz keine Anschrift.
Fehler berichtigt
Karteneditierer (2016-03-26 13:35:23+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank.
sander79 (2016-03-30 09:28:04+00:00): is de maximale snelheid van 80km/h op way 331339795 wel goed? De ways ervoor en erna zijn 140km/h.

Verder ontbreekt er nog een maximale snelheid op way 331339803
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SK53 (2016-04-08 13:10:46+00:00): Please if you add data to OpenStreetMap check if something has already been mapped. This particular chip shop has been on OSM for around 6 years.

I would also like to query the source for your data as you have made edits all over the country. Please note that we have particular requirements if you are adding data through some automated method: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
take-a-way (2016-04-08 14:42:09+00:00): 1/ when i added the entry the shop was not visible to me on OSM otherwise  i would have added to the existing entry.
2/ The source of the edits for takeaways is the website take-a-way.co.uk.
3/ i do not have an automated menthod my data sources are - the maps or photos on the menu, google maps (i offer corrections on there also) Google streetmaps i look at the images and count chimneys and other features to identify the exact location.
SK53 (2016-04-08 16:03:34+00:00): 1/ It was visible on the OSM map (and is still visible).
2/ You can only use the take-a-way.co.uk site if you have permission from the owners of the copyright and they are aware of the terms under which OSM data is distributed.
3/ Any use of Google Maps violates the Contributor Agreement which you assented to when you signed up to OSM, and also violates the T&Cs of Google. Adding data sourced from Google makes OSM vulnerable to taken down notices from Google. In the past we have sought permission to use Google aerial imagery but this has never been granted, at least in part because Google themselves do not own the rights.

OSM is principally about the contribution of field surveyed data: not scraping websites to create another directory.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
PT-53 (2016-04-09 18:30:43+00:00): Way 203275564 aufgrund eines Hinweises komplett mit surface=grass ergänzt. Dies trifft aber nur auf etwa die Hälfte des Weges zu.
Weg nach Ortsbegehung neu klassifiziert.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trial (2022-12-30 22:51:27+00:00): Bonjour, si une voie ferrée a été déferrée et est devenue une route, railway=razed, pas abandonned
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Ogmios (2016-03-27 19:08:58+00:00): 👍🏿
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
tyr_asd (2016-07-06 19:21:30+00:00): Hi!

Danke für deinen Beitrag, denk aber in Zukunft bitte daran, dass die Luftbilder unter Umständen auch veraltet sein können bzw. nicht mehr den aktuellen Stand der Dinge wiedergeben. Das ist z.B. beim Dantercepies-Lift der Fall gewesen, dessen Stationen du hier bearbeitet hast. Siehe dazu auch die Diskussion in folgendem OSM-Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/387585

Gruß! Martin
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Ogmios (2016-03-27 19:09:13+00:00): 👍🏿
mavl (2019-03-20 16:40:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-20 16:41:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2016-03-26 20:14:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3941004069
To jest chyba wpłatomat/bankomat.

Czy weryfikujesz te importy z Millenium opisane jako Euronet w terenie? To są najczęsciej bankomaty BZ WBK a nie Euronetu.
Zmianowy (2016-03-26 22:57:22+00:00): Wpłatomat jest osobno, obok bankomat, a za nim budka telefoniczna. Wcześniej, pod nr 38 zaznaczono bankomat Euronet, ale go tam nie ma, ani informacji o nim, dlatego właśnie... poszedł do kosza.
maraf24 (2016-03-27 21:44:38+00:00): Na Bema najpierw jest bankomat dla niewidomych, obok niego jest bankomat zwykły. Wpłatomat jest kilkanaście metrów dalej, tam gdzie ikonka banku.
A w przypadku importu z Millenium chodziło mi o ten atm: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/935802341/history
Jest to moim zdaniem bankomat BZ WBK, a nie Euronetu.
Zmianowy (2016-03-29 12:43:17+00:00): To wpłatomat/bankomat Euronetu ID=RCNI0D16, podobnie jak na pietrze (ID=RCNI0264)
Lista wpłatomatów EURONET: 
http://www.mbank.pl/download/lista_wplatomatow_sieci_euronet.xls
mavl (2019-03-23 16:14:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:14:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Blackbird27 (2016-03-26 19:20:28+00:00): Встанови JOSM, посиди, розбирися за 3-5 днів і не мучайся в iD, дороги не можуть бути членами мультиполігону landuse=residential, назва вулиці повинна бути у форматі **** вулиця, наприклад Кармелюка вулиця, а не просто Кармелюка, читай вікі та форум http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
rab (2016-03-26 12:13:19+00:00): unclassified is definitely wrong
PT-53 (2016-04-27 08:37:57+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz enthält ways_without_tags
Siehe OSMI: 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.40272&lat=47.80491&zoom=12&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,misspelled_node_keys,misspelled_way_keys,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,unwayed_segments,ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
BeKri (2016-04-28 16:38:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
da ist noch mehr "schief" gewesen ...
Gruß derBeKri
poornibadrinath (2016-04-15 05:51:04+00:00): Hey, @SimMoonXP
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
Alexey Vazhnov (2016-03-27 06:03:28+00:00): This change looks like vandalism.
sergeybe (2016-03-27 14:19:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.
lilienthaler (2016-07-06 16:54:20+00:00): Hallo, nur ein kleiner Hinweis, Straßen die Wasserwege kreuzen bitte nicht verbinden, sondern mit einem Culvert oder einer Brücke fixen. Gruß und danke, Lilienthaler
geow (2016-07-07 07:19:48+00:00): ...keine Regel ohne Ausnahme: Falls eine Furt besteht, wird der gemeinsame Node mit ford=yes getaggt. Gruß geow
user_5359 (2016-04-01 06:21:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtanning_salon, too

If you need help: You are welcome!
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-26 21:48:54+00:00): Boisko rysuje się innaczej,po liniach bocznych
maraf24 (2016-03-26 22:16:58+00:00): To chyba nie było ustalone. 
Jeśli traktować boisko jako obiekt fizyczny, to można je rysować tak jak tutaj. A w przypadku boisk wielofunkcyjnych często inaczej się nie da.
VA00 (2016-03-27 05:56:40+00:00): Wyłaziło za płot, wiec je zmniejszyłem. Reszta zmian nie moja.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-27 07:33:13+00:00): Rysuje po liniach bocznych ,jak są widoczne
gpstracks (2016-03-26 12:36:24+00:00): Sorry, but I don't understand the meaning of this edit. You have drawn buildings on top of existing ones. Can you please explain?

Thank You
poornibadrinath (2016-04-14 06:41:26+00:00): Hey, @gunnar1m
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
gileri (2016-03-27 16:20:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a une petite coquille sur le tag opening_hours=*, le vendredi devrait être représenté par "Fr", et non par "Fri"
gileri (2016-08-17 20:08:49+00:00): Corrigé dans le changeset 41520529
Wolle DD (2016-03-27 02:04:46+00:00): Hier hast Du einen neuen Weg über die vorhandene Schneebergstraße gelegt und damit fehlerhafte Abbiegebeschränkungen erstellt.
Siehe http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38078127
Über diese bin ich auf deine ganzen Änderungen gestoßen...
Das habe ich repariert und die doppelte Straße gelöscht...
Ich empfehle Dir generell als Hilfe das Einstiegswiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a und von da aus weiterführende Links zu speziellen Wikis.
Außerdem kannst Du direkt bei den Linien und Nodes auf die Attribute klicken um Informationen darüber zu erhalten. Als Bespiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28110579
MKnight (2016-05-31 13:04:56+00:00): teilweise rückgängig gemacht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688234
DD1GJ (2016-03-26 09:19:03+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

willkommen zurück bei OSM. Deine Edits sind perfekt bis auf die Angabe von selbstverständlichen Defaultwerten wie access=yes, foot=yes und layer=0 bei einer normalen Wohnstraße.
Wolle DD (2016-03-27 01:04:34+00:00): Entschuldigung, aber an diesem Changeset ist einiges nicht perfekt. Folgende Standardwerte sind überflüssig: access=yes, layer=0. Wenn lanes=2 und oneway nicht definiert ist (oder no), dann werden die Richtungsfahrbahnen automatisch bestimmt. Nur bei einer ungeraden Anzahl sollten die Richtungsfahrbahnen angegeben werden.
foot=delivery ist falsch - oder darf man hier nur langlaufen, wenn man was anliefert?
Und foot=yes ist wiederum Standard und braucht nicht angegeben zu werden.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 17:41:26+00:00): Did you just copy these from Google?  What has me concerned is your tagging in  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182541134
GoWestTravel (2016-08-31 17:46:09+00:00): You're absolutely right. I copied this one from Google and I regret doing so. I know better than to do that, but apparently had a sloppy moment 5 months ago. I removed the error and I apologize for getting this into the OSM database. It will not happen again.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 17:50:43+00:00): OK, that's...odd.  How are you sourcing this data, typically?  It's one thing to survey on the ground but copying from sources that don't allow that is a major red flag.
Mirecnet (2017-11-08 20:18:38+00:00): Öttavi katlan ? - tourism attraction ?
Prostredne Spiske pleso  - Zbojnicka chata
Jojo4u (2016-03-28 15:19:29+00:00): Hallo Uhkabu,

mehr Aussagekraft in deinen Changesetkommentaren wäre schön. Dies nutzt anderen Mapper, wie mir. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

LG Joachim
BCNorwich (2016-03-26 14:32:19+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know that the footpath does not join to Toot Hill Road to the south. Was it supposed to?
dgitto (2016-03-26 10:34:05+00:00): Quindi perché non building=church?
Cristi4n (2016-03-30 11:14:17+00:00): Scusa ma sono nuovo... adesso è ok?
dgitto (2016-03-30 12:11:32+00:00): Tranquillo siamo qui per condividere. Vanno messi entrambi i tag; "amenity=place_of_worship" in quanto luogo di culto e "building=church" in quanto edificio nato come chiesa (non cappella o cattedrale etc). Non conosco il tuo editor (iD) ma dovrebbe già proporti tutto. In ogni caso basta che controlli sul wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
dgitto (2016-03-30 12:12:21+00:00): ah... e adesso dobbiamo scoprire il nome però, per completare il lavoro :-)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
chnav (2016-03-26 10:50:39+00:00): Описания следует помещать не в тег name (официальное название), а в тег note (примечание для картографов) или description (описание для пользователей).
ts123plus (2016-03-26 12:39:01+00:00): Ок, приму к сведению (на первый раз отталкивался от неверных примеров рядом с редактируемой областью).
chnav (2016-03-26 13:13:35+00:00): т.к. вы редактируете в JOSM (что очень похвально) рекомендую в закладки эту страницу http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Map_Features
DD1GJ (2016-03-26 13:16:08+00:00): Hallo bmwgs123,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Bei Deinem ersten Edit ist etwas gründlich schiefgegangen, so dass ich alles zurückgesetzt habe. Routen für Buslinien oder ähnliches werden als Relation eingetragen. Was hattest Du genau vor?
Alecs01 (2016-03-26 11:28:33+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! per come taggare le scuole vedi qua: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dschool building=school da solo non basta a descriverle. Ciao buon mapping!
Cristi4n (2016-03-30 07:32:21+00:00): ciao, scusa ma sono nuovo e sto imparando...ho corretto, dimmi se così va bene, Grazie
Alecs01 (2016-03-31 20:14:53+00:00): sì esatto, il nome a questo punto lo sposterei sul perimetro dell'area amenity=school (o delle aree visto che di scuole mi pare di vedere ce n'è più di una, vedi tu). Un altro piccolo appunto, i percorsi pedonali come questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406585699 o quelli del parco dietro le scuole dovresti prolungarli fino a toccare la strada con cui si incrociano invece di fermarli prima (vedi es questo marciapiede che ha un nodo in comune con tutte le strade che incrocia: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34388725), altrimenti rimangono delle "isole" separate dal resto del grafo stradale che un programma di routing non potrebbe raggiungere. Non è semplice all'inizio, ma mappare poco per volta la propria cittadina dà soddisfazione :) chiedi pure se ti posso aiutare per qualcos'altro, ciao!
Wolle DD (2016-03-27 01:42:58+00:00): Hier sind fast alle Deine Ergänzungen überflüssig. access=no in der Kombination psv=yes bedeutet, dass außer der öffentliche Nahverkehr niemand anderes, egal ob Fußgänger, Pferde oder Traktoren darauf dürfen. Da braucht auch sidewalk nicht definiert zu werden.
hgv=official ist bestimmt falsch und hier auch nicht definiert: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:hgv?uselang=de
emergency=yes ist hingegen richtig.
zstadler (2016-09-16 13:35:26+00:00): Hi WillRock41,

It seems like there is a discrepancy about the inter-city highway classification on the Israel OSM wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Inter-city_Roads_-_Guidelines

On one hand it says "First rule for numbered roads: The category is determined by the color of the sign, not by the number of digits! " and on the other had it says that "All motorways have the following sign when entering [sign #216]".

Road 5 is an example where it is marked in blue yet the entrances may not have sign 216.

In my opinion only the color should determine the highway classification.

What do you think?

Zeev
zstadler (2016-10-09 14:21:42+00:00): Hello WillRock41,

There was no response from you and you have been editing since my previous comment.

Unless there is a response in another week, I will assume you do not object to me reverting the highway classification of Hwy 5 and similar blue-signed highways to a "motorway" and the correction of the wiki page accordingly.

Best regards,
Zeev
WillRock41 (2016-10-11 10:20:49+00:00): I think that the road standards should determine the highway classification

some parts of highway 5 have sidewalks and some have narrow shoulders
zstadler (2016-10-11 11:17:23+00:00): Highway classification is about road importance - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
.
Looking at the final proposal 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17256
in the discussion that led to the decision on the highway tagging, I see that It's the road sign color that was adopted as the criteria for the OSM classification.
It clearly states: "First rule for numbered roads: It doesn't count the amount of digits but the color of the sign!"
.
The presence of sign #216 or the specific speed limit signs is not a criteria in the approved proposal.
PT-53 (2016-04-05 07:29:45+00:00): landuse enthielt self_intersection_ways
> berichtigt
Wolle DD (2016-03-27 01:26:49+00:00): Hier sind einige Fehler gemacht worden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313723262:
cycleway=opposite_lane gibt es meines Erachtens nicht. Und wenn, dann ist es nur bei Einbahnstraßen sinnvoll.
Bei Angabe von cycleway:right=track sollte auch cycleway:left angegeben sein - und nicht cycleway=
lanes:bus:forward=1 dies wird anders angegeben. Auf alle Fälle war hier lanes:forward=2 richtig. Die Benutzungsrechte vergibt man dann entweder mit access:lanes:forward=bus|yes oder so wie hier angegeben: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lanes
Außerdem beißt sich das Ganze mit den angegebenen Abbiegespuren: turn:lanes:forward=through|right
Ja, und die Benutzungsrechte (access=yes, foot=yes und vehicle=yes) sind überflüssig weil standardmäßig vorhanden...
Warum sind an einigen Straßen und Wegen layer=1? Hier ist alles ebenerdig und überschneidet sich nicht.
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-09-06 14:47:59+00:00): Hello,
Itt találtam egy utcát, amit egyirányúnak jelöltél, de van megadva sáv és sebesség mindkét irányban
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74710227
Melyik itt az igazság?
Kösz
Zsolt
Petymag (2018-09-06 15:00:26+00:00): Szia Zsolt!
Az úton az utolsó módosítást Tompika hajtotta végre az úton 12 hónapja (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74710227#map=17/46.30487/18.51623).
Bonyhádi vagyok, hétvégén megnézem, hogy akkor most mi van az úttal, de 2 éve még egyirányú volt.
Péter
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-09-06 15:35:33+00:00): Hello,
az elem history-jában úgy láttam, hogy mindkét jelölés ebben a csomagban került rá, ezért írtam ide.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74710227/history)
Ettől függetlenül, ha megteszed, hogy utánajársz, azt nagyon köszönöm.
Üdv
Zsolt
aceman444 (2016-10-19 20:53:09+00:00): Dobry den, prosim davajte pozor na velke zaciatocne pismeno nazvu obce. Napr. way 405839255 . A ked je to len place=hamlet, nedavajte na oblast place=village, ale tiez len hamlet. Nevyrabajte neexistujuce obce, ked su to len casti/osady.
Dakujem.
maraf24 (2016-03-28 10:29:48+00:00): Cześć.
Prawidłowy adres to po prostu "Płonne nr_domu", wpisywane do addr:place i addr:housenumber. Nic więcej nie trzeba.
Nie używamy miejscowości poczty w OSM, jest ona też zbędna dla Poczty Polskiej.
Nie wpisujemy też miejscowości w polu na nazwę ulicy, bo potem wyszukiwarka adresów głupieje.
Poprawiłem te adresy.
Na razie.
ralfwessels (2016-03-28 13:30:21+00:00): Hallo Nakaner-repair,
danke für den Hinweis!
Ralf
literan (2016-03-28 12:34:44+00:00): МТС у вас получился посреди двора. А где на самом деле?
vng_me (2016-03-28 13:12:31+00:00): Дорисовал здание.
user_101460 (2016-03-26 15:14:40+00:00): こんばんは。
地図編集後に入力するコミットメッセージについてですが、編集内容とメッセージ内容が一致していないようです。

コミットメッセージは、他のマッパーが、どんな編集をされたかを知るために書きます。

「龍野小学校のプールはお堀の中」というメッセージでは、どのような事をされたのかわからないので、「○○の建物を追加」や「××の道を修正」といった感じで実際におこなった編集内容について書いていただけないでしょうか。

よろしくお願いします。
Hjart (2016-03-26 15:34:16+00:00): Please do not use too many nodes. (See pkt. 1 in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
PlaneMad (2016-04-07 07:56:54+00:00): Made a bunch of fixes and updates at UAS. Fixed the road classifications, removed overlapping roads, improved the connections, added details to the playgrounds. Please check if it looks ok.
user_870861 (2016-04-10 08:43:04+00:00): hi,
i've just fixed duplicated geom and tags from this changeset (and other)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38445132
Issue can be detected with osmose and fixed with josm.
If you can know "how it's appened", (bug josm, upload multiple layer of same data...)

chears, me
EoghanM (2016-09-09 09:47:23+00:00): Tags should have been modified on this to indicate disuse instead of deleting the node entirely. E.g. 'operator:1989-2016'->'Infratil Airports Europe' etc.
If someone else takes over operation of the airport and reopens it it'd be nice to have continuity of the node/tags.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-30 21:11:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38179313 where the changeset comment is: reverted mechanical edits made by newly-created user wischmat after complaints in German forum, and after wischmat neglected to explain himself there. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=585844