piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2021-10-06 05:11:02+00:00): Yo estoy notando que también se están dividiendo vías que suelen tener características similares, por lo que he restaurado las vías.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
SomeoneElse (2021-10-30 23:16:49+00:00): Hello Eng Lyrad,

You've again added a number of "viewpoints" to OSM, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9150397017 here looks very much like a personal bookmark.

When you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark and select "menu" and then "bookmark".

Best Regards,
Andy
ovruni (2021-10-06 21:38:15+00:00): Hola, algunas de estas vertientes cruzaban con carreteras, las cuales no tenían ni puentes ni vados.
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-10-07 19:17:50+00:00): Ok. No sabia que significaba ford. Agregare esos cruces en futuras ediciones que realize. Saludos.
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 03:38:29+00:00): ok, il fallait jsute décaler le bati
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112146433
Kovoschiz (2021-10-06 06:23:36+00:00): What are you trying to do here?
Frans S (2021-10-06 08:47:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please map more accurate and square each building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112147112
Frans S (2021-10-06 09:21:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
I commented already on mapping on several tasksquares at the time. This is about your mapping quality:
Your mappings are subject for improvement. Lacks accuracy and squaring,s

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112147477
Frans S (2021-10-06 09:23:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
See my comments on changeset 112147669

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112147669
Jennifer Jacobsen-Wood (2021-10-06 15:34:08+00:00): Hi! thanks! We walked that section despite the private signs. :)

Oh, and our Grant Street node disappeared in the most recent Citystrides update. Thank goodness!
Frans S (2021-10-06 09:00:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, and try not to include the yard near a building in your mapping
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112147941
szjozsef (2021-10-07 14:15:19+00:00): I think, by mistake, you deleted some segments from the country border boundary between USA(Michigan) / Canada(Manitoulin District)  !!! 
Please fix it !
jodd (2022-02-03 20:43:22+00:00): Hallo,
kann es sein, dass du dich bei der ref des Briefkastens https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/476678019 vertippt hast? Die Straße heißt ja nicht Schaumburgstraße, sondern Schaumburger Straße.
VG jodd
user_10241830 (2022-02-03 20:47:11+00:00): Hallo,

wenn ich mich richtig erinnere heißt es auf dem Briefkasten tatsächlich abweichend von der richtigen Schreibweise der Straße "Schaumburgstraße". Das gibt es manchmal, dass die Post die Straße anders schreibt. Die offizielle Karte der Post hat diese Schreibweise übrigens ebenfalls.
jodd (2022-02-03 22:04:41+00:00): Spannend, danke für die Info!
mavl (2021-10-07 15:02:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. После этого пакета правок карта отображает дом с непрямыми углами. Воспользуйтесь, пожалуйста, командой "Сделать углы прямыми", чтобы сделать дом прямоугольным.
mavl (2021-10-07 15:03:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здание с названием "магазин". Вероятно, это ошибка. И нужно добавить специальный тег для магазина.
mavl (2021-10-07 15:05:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет гараж с названием "гараж". Вероятно, это ошибка, так как вряд ли этот гараж имеет название (тем более "гараж").
mavl (2021-10-07 15:08:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок (и другие пакеты правок) добавляет новую дорогу поверх существующей дороги. Так делать не нужно. Дорога на местности одна и на на карте она тоже должна быть одна. Нужно редактировать существующие дороги, а не добавлять поверх них новые. Все добавленные дороги удалены с карты.
ovruni (2021-10-06 05:13:55+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha dividido una vía, terminando ambos segmentos las mismas características.
Saludos
mariotomo (2021-10-07 00:36:41+00:00): hi. isn't it huge, the area impacted by this changeset?  and too short the comment, to explain what goes on here?
Horza (2021-10-07 20:42:16+00:00): Looks like most of this changeset is in El Paso apart from this one node

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6358919827
mariotomo (2021-10-08 17:25:57+00:00): can happen.  I also occasionally forget to commit things, start mapping elsewhere, and end with a large changeset area.  a more explicit changeset comment may help in such cases.
skquinn (2021-10-14 19:29:58+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments in the future. This comment, as entered, is almost useless.

Also, please save before changing areas. There is no reason to lump an edit in Paraguay (?) with edits in Texas, US.
ovruni (2021-10-06 05:18:54+00:00): Hola, los nombres deben de ir solamente en objetos que tengan un nombre en particular, no es para agregar descripciones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Becky Candy (2021-10-06 10:55:01+00:00): Reverted this changeset because the buildings exist in bing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112150776
dktue (2022-11-02 06:43:53+00:00): Wäre es nicht besser, die Gebäude-Bezeichnungen (Buchstabe) in einem ref-Tag festzuhalten und den Fachbereich in ein faculty-Tag?
Frans S (2021-10-06 08:18:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Some buildings are mapped a bit oversized. Don't include the shadow of the building.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112151563
Dodko (2021-10-06 09:13:32+00:00): Vytvoril iste objekty ale nedali im značku building, opravil som to.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990234202/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990234201/history
Pan Perníček (2021-10-06 09:21:26+00:00): Dobrý den,
omlouvám se za chybu, vznikla nechtěně.
eggie (2021-10-06 07:56:26+00:00): Dag Tvdb-HVC  Je vraagt feedback. Dit lijkt me oké.

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-18 11:13:47+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3523052 ?
Becky Candy (2021-10-06 10:54:28+00:00): Reverted this changeset because the buildings exist in bing imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112152187
Osmwithspace (2022-12-02 12:06:59+00:00): Bei landuse=construction braucht es kein area=yes ;-)
John Eff (2022-12-05 10:34:36+00:00): danke :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-06 08:11:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please stay within the task square which is allocated to you,
I have send you a PM on OSM message.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112152454
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
elsy1 (2021-10-08 20:05:11+00:00): درود و وقت بخیر با توجه به اینکه خیابان هایی که رسم کردید در نقشه های ماهواره ای قابل دیدن نیستند لطفا منبع خود را برای ویرایش هاتون قرار بدید و تگ خیابان مناسب رو هم اعمال کنید تشکر
skyper (2021-10-06 17:10:37+00:00): Hallo JannikK
`FIXME` ist absolut OK und auf der Wikiseite auch erwähnt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:FIXME).
Wenn Du es schon änderst, dann doch bitte bei allen Relationen einer ÖPV-Linie, inklusive route_master. So ist es noch inkonsistenter als vorher.

Grüße skyper
Nearby0051 (2021-10-06 18:47:15+00:00): Moin skyper
Habe ich irgendwas falsch gemacht?

Das changeset wurde via streetcomplete survey erstellt.
Von wegen fixme und Relationen habe ich nichts angefasst

Grüße
skyper (2021-10-07 00:13:01+00:00): Hi JanniKK
Sorry, tut mir leid. Da habe ich mich vertan und diesen CS übersehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4038324

Grüße skyper
Kovoschiz (2021-10-06 14:11:14+00:00): It's going to be `=trunk` if not Expressway.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-06 14:14:08+00:00): Or you mean Tunnel Area. 
May be `=motorway_link` if no `=ref`, and not Expressway or Tunnel Area.
Carto'Cité (2021-12-22 14:25:05+00:00): You are right but the lane was overkilled ;)
Charles - Carto’Cité for #CartoVeloIdF
mcliquid (2022-04-08 13:54:27+00:00): Hallo Baroosh2, ich kann nirgends eine Information zu dieser Totalsperre finden. Hast du mir dazu eine Quelle? Besteht die Sperre weiterhin?
Weißt du eventuell bis wann diese Sperre gilt?

Vielen Dank!
Vinber-Pro (2021-10-13 08:05:20+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap !
Quelques éléments d'accueil ici (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue).

à la lecture de votre pseudo je suppose que vous travaillez à l'OTPB, ce qui implique à mon avis plusieurs points selon moi :
- le préciser sur votre profil
- il "devient" vraiment important que l'otpb se penche sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
- faire une page wiki dédiée
- ne pas hésiter à transmettre à Stéphanie et/ou les collègues

Ce que j'écris ici ne concerne en rien la qualité de vos contributions que je n'ai encore que peu regardé, mais de bonnes pratiques vis à vis de la communauté de contributrices et contributeurs

Bonne carto
OTPBIJAUREGUIBERRY (2021-10-13 08:49:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Je travaille en effet pour l'OTPB et je vais l'ajouter sur le profil pour éclaircir cela.

Merci encore pour vos conseil et je vous souhaite une bonne journée,

Iñaki.
pyram (2021-11-21 12:36:56+00:00): fully revertet, because mapped since 10 years:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1889538/history
jeslop (2021-10-06 08:08:50+00:00): Hola Ymera, gracias por colaborar con OSM.
Echa un vistazo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres antes de seguir, ya que no debes describir el objeto en el lugar del nombre. La etiqueta ya nos dice que es un pantalán, no hace falta que se lo añadas a cada uno.
Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2021-10-06 08:00:34+00:00): Dag Tvdb  Dit gaat helaas niet werken. Een barrier=bollard hoort gewoonlijk op een node die verbonden is met de weg. De oostelijke barrier=bollard was niet verbonden met het woonwerf. Dan heeft het geen effect. Ik heb dat net aangepast.
Je toevoegingen op de lijnelementen zal ik verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 20:07:37+00:00): Het werkt al https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.82269%2C4.67999%3B51.82248%2C4.67971
Nakaner (2021-10-26 14:13:06+00:00): Hallo,

ich hoffe, du hast die Prüfung(en) bestanden, die du in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990257442/history vermutlich unabsichlich beschrieben hast. :-) Aber was ist eigentlich die richtige Hausnummer für das Gebäude?

Viele Grüße

Michael
sauerland-radfahrer (2021-10-26 14:25:46+00:00): Hallo Michael,
es ist ein Nebengebäude ohne Hausnummer.
VG.
DeFra85 (2021-10-08 16:06:00+00:00): Warst du überhaupt vor Ort? Oder hast du Tomaten auf den Augen?

Die Fuß-UND-Radweg-Übergänge sind auf kompletter Länge deutlich erhöht von der Straße und getrennt (DE:Zeichen 241-30/31). Zudem ist die Fahrbahn für Autos auf eine Spur durch Blumenbeete an beiden Seiten verengt.
Muhmaker (2021-10-08 18:17:35+00:00): Von welchem Übergang sprichst du genau? Es gibt nämlich gerade drei sehr verschiedene Ausführungen. Und mindestens zwei davon waren komplett falsch herbeigeraten bevor ich sie bearbeitet habe. Also was genau stört dich an welchem Übergang?
meinmap (2021-10-06 17:39:48+00:00): Ciao, credo che sia sbagliato inserire il nome "Confine tra X e Y" per un confine.
Sono sufficienti name left e right
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-06 17:49:00+00:00): concordo
user_10901495 (2021-10-07 08:05:56+00:00): Mettere il name anche nei confini serve a un duplice scopo. 
Primo perché non vengano mostrati come linee fucsia nel software Vespucci, colore che sta ad indicare che i tag non sono completi (nel caso dei confini perché manca il name)
Secondo perché questo viene mostrato in alto nella vista della way, dandole un titolo; potete osservarlo andando sulla way del confine tra Bollate e Arese.
La mia valutazione è che potrà darsi che queste ragioni siano delle sottigliezze, ma il fatto di mettere un tag in più ai confini non è di sicuro una cosa sproporzionata.
meinmap (2021-10-07 14:36:20+00:00): I validatori (come Vespucci, josm, id etc..) suggeriscono alcuni valori ma non sempre hanno ragione. Quando per esempio da iD aggiungi un edificio, tra i campi compilabili preforniti c'è anche quello dell'indirizzo, ma in italia non va compilato perchè l'indirizzo di mette come nodo, e quindi va lasciato vuoto, ma non per questo il campo è incompleto. Inoltre secondo me aggiungere il nome così è un nome descrittivo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things).

PS: non voglio essere ne scontroso ne arrogante, sono solo consigli in base alle regole abituali della community
Alecs01 (2021-10-07 18:13:21+00:00): Credo che il validatore segnali come errore la presenza di name:left=* e name:right=* senza name=* ma in realtà non è che serva aggiungere un nome proprio (il confine non ne ha uno come dice meinmap) sono gli altri due tag (name:left=* e name:right=*) ad essere superflui in questo caso. Sono il frutto di un import di molti anni fa (nello specifico questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/3318081), si potrebbero tranquillamente togliere senza perdita di informazioni, sono sufficienti le relazioni dei confini amministrativi per dire cosa si trova sui due lati https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Way_tags Quei tag si usano per oggetti che hanno effettivamente due nomi diversi "sui due lati", tipicamente una strada sul confine tra due comuni ad esempio (come questa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340183380). Non è il caso del nostro confine amministrativo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447145653, che non si chiama nè "Arese" nè "Bollate".
meinmap (2021-10-07 18:35:30+00:00): Grazie Alecs01, commento molto esaustivo, hai tolto dei dubbi anche a me.
user_10901495 (2021-10-08 07:20:33+00:00): Grazie per le risposte, ma vorrei chiarire il mio commento precedente. Non ho detto che Vespucci abbia ragione, ho semplicemente evidenziato quel comportamento. Ora, io uso Vespucci, e preferirei vedere meno cose fucsia/incomplete (almeno secondo Vespucci) possibili, dato che queste pregiudicano anche il fatto di capire di quale oggetto si tratta a primo sguardo. Se per un oggetto i tag sono completi Vespucci lo farà vedere con una texture specifica per quell'oggetto, per esempio nel caso dei confini una linea tratteggiata nera. In questo modo se uno vede questa linea saprà già che si tratta di un confine. 
Inoltre Vespucci non lo uso solo io, quindi questa cosa può essere utile anche ad altri eventuali utenti.
Aggiungo che non penso che mettere il campo name crei dei problemi in altri software di editing o in generale nel database di OpenStreetMap. Dobbiamo metterci d'accordo sui termini che utilizziamo, nel primo commento @meinmap diceva che riteneva "sbagliato" l'utilizzo del nome. Forse intendeva semplicemente che fosse superfluo.
Penso che per le due ragioni che ho esposto il fatto di mettere il name nei confini abbia un senso, ma se voleste farmi notare un errore che questo provochi da qualche parte sarò pronto a ricredermi :)
Concludo dicendo che la cosa scritta da @Alecs01 non è corretta. Vespucci segnala gli elementi come incompleti solo per la mancanza di certi tag, non per la presenza di tag non necessari.
 
Buon venerdì!
Martino
Alecs01 (2021-10-08 11:40:11+00:00): Se è così, è un errore di Vespucci, dare un nome ad un confine non serve a nulla, lo ignorerei semplicemente (come gli indirizzi sugli edifici nell'esempio di meinmap). Nessun altro editor lo segnala come errore peraltro. Per di più, rimane sempre la regola generale che name=* indica il nome proprio di un oggetto, non la descrizione di cosa è (per quello si usano i tag adatti) e il confine un nome proprio non lo ha.
Ciao
Alecs
meinmap (2021-10-08 11:46:01+00:00): Concordo con Alecs.
Buona giornata a entrambi :)
Frans S (2021-10-06 08:15:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
The adjacent road does not match image. No problem moving it a bit to the correct location.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112156679
Захар Кравцов (2021-11-16 08:37:14+00:00): Wy did you delete all these trails?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112156720
Frans S (2021-10-06 08:12:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112156758
KirillB (2021-10-06 08:11:23+00:00): Footpaths along Helmstedter Str. in Klein Schöpenstedt were transformed to sidewalks, some crossings were added and improved. Positioning was improved.
NB: when the new aerial maps will be available, it is important to re-draw the circle on Helmstedter Str/K141 (it is already exist, but cyclepaths and crossings around are not entirely correct mapped)
ivanbranco (2021-11-21 08:29:12+00:00): Hi SK53,

what's the meaning of folly=yes?