piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Santi2222 (2022-10-10 12:28:28+00:00): Please, avoid edits like this. First, these streets you tagged are not named "Argandoña entitatea" (and the like), they have no name and they are tagged as such. Second, the source for this edit seems to be Google Maps (something that shouldn't be done in general, even more so when what Google Maps shows is incorrect).
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-30 10:21:47+00:00): Korrektur Kommentar:
name -> description
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
arkhi (2022-09-30 10:26:13+00:00): L’utilisation de « romani » fait référence au consensus actuel, à surveiller : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people#English_usage.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:17:35+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Highway = residential tag is to be used in urban (towny) area.  Just unclassified is sufficient here.
in 1 occasion, you did not map a bridge over a waterway
Furthermore. Well mapped.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126816850
woodpeck (2023-07-27 16:10:06+00:00): Dear AlexZam, could you please give an indicatio where the "Russian maritime notice 2021/4963; NM_2147.pdf" can be downloaded/viewed? I was not able to find it on the web.
AlexZam (2023-08-04 14:23:01+00:00): It's here: https://structure.mil.ru/files/morf/military/files/NM_2147.pdf
The whole list is at https://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/hydrographic/esim.htm
AlexZam (2023-08-04 14:24:02+00:00): And notice 4963 is on page 9.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 14:20:57+00:00): Hi uy56, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping? You removed several mapped tracks. Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 14:21:42+00:00): (partly) reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126820898
Guy56 (2022-09-30 16:11:30+00:00): Hi, these are private (and forbidden to public) roads for which the owner does not wish to let them appear on OpenStreetMap due to criminal offences that occured.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
francians (2022-09-30 18:52:56+00:00): Ciao, 
Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Cosa cercavi di fare? Non si capisce ne dal messaggio ne dalle modifiche
JezzaJay (2022-12-15 16:42:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping and contributed to HOT. Please do not add any info for "name" when creating a building unless you have local knowledge of that exact house.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126818230
mavl (2022-10-01 11:59:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Слово "Музей" не нужно добавлять в название музея. То, что это музей, следует из тега tourism=museum.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 11:03:34+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183869322

https://osm.org/changeset/183869322
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
yasslay (2022-09-30 11:40:38+00:00): Hello!

May you explain what you added here? You added some tagging to the elements which you edited here like addresses and servicing on vehicles, however you appeared to have tagged a meadow as being a place for body repairs, however it appears that this has already been tagged as seen in the element Redditch Body Repairs.

Kind regards,
yasslay
Tez Bexter (2022-09-30 12:05:16+00:00): Hi Yasslay. To be perfectly honest, I did not find the map editing very easy.I was hoping that I could just move the cursor point of our business whereabouts and it would stay there?
No, it is not in a meadow, obviously my stupid error. We are based at Breedon view. Love lyne lane. Callow hill. Redditch. B975QD. I tried to explain where we are situated,
yasslay (2022-09-30 12:09:13+00:00): Oh I see. I can try and fix this for you, I presume it is at Breedon View Farm?
yasslay (2022-09-30 12:16:32+00:00): Just to confirm, the name of your business is Redditch Body Repairs?
Tez Bexter (2022-09-30 12:17:13+00:00): Hi Yasslay. No. It is Breedon View. If you could possibly fix it for me i would be very grateful as in search it comes up we are based in Cheltenham and not Redditch. Kind regards Tez,
Tez Bexter (2022-09-30 12:20:42+00:00): Yes. The name of our business is Redditch Body Repairs.
yasslay (2022-09-30 12:26:05+00:00): Hello!

I think I have fixed the issues here. I have removed the tagging you added which weren't related to your business and have corrected some of the tagging in regards to your business!

If you need any more help please let me know and if I have made any errors myself please tell me.

When I searched for your business in OSM, it did not display Cheltenham, but correctly showed Redditch instead.

Also, it's fine that you're not good at the editor. It takes time to get used to, but it is fairly easy to understand. If you want to, you can contribute more to the local area. Every little bit helps!

Oh, and, I hope this has helped!

Kind regards,
yasslay
Tez Bexter (2022-09-30 12:34:19+00:00): Yasslay, you are a star! Thank you so much for your help,Although it shows 2 ways, 1 of which is Breedon view farm. Is it possible to remove this for me as it has no connection with Breedon view? I really do appreciate the time and effort you have given me. Kind regards Tez.
yasslay (2022-09-30 12:49:01+00:00): Hello!

Thank you, and if what is currently Bredon View Farm isn't a farm then I can remove the farm name from it and retag it to be a commercial landuse instead if this is a better description of the various business alongside yours in Bredon View.

I will also note that i may not be available for a while so I may make some of these changes later!

Kind regards,
yasslay
Tez Bexter (2022-09-30 12:55:33+00:00): Although it is a farm, as i say, it has no connection with Breedon view Yasslay. But if you could do what you have suggested, that would be great! Regards Tez,
yasslay (2022-09-30 13:50:59+00:00): Alright! I'll change the landuse to a farm area however I will make sure it is excluded from your body repair shop.

Have a good time contributing to OSM, and most importantly of all, have a great day and weekend!

Kind regards,
yasslay
yasslay (2022-09-30 13:54:23+00:00): You can see the changes I made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126824691.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-30 17:11:32+00:00): Hej, czy ten AED jest w środku budynku czy może na zewnątrz?
mateem (2022-10-01 22:58:40+00:00): W kapsule na ścianie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:29:04+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
flohoff (2022-12-14 18:03:07+00:00): Moin,
ich lösche hier mal die Lift gates. Das ist kein lift gate das die Straße dauerhaft blockiert sondern teil des Bahnüberganges.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10064077176
SHARCRASH (2022-09-30 11:44:05+00:00): wrong description, sorry: sidewalks split/detailed/corrected, other new elements
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Patchanka (2022-10-04 09:06:59+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue,
merci pour l'ajout de la fontaine. Cependant elle était déjà cartographiée ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5476217782
De plus vous avez juste indiqué un nom : "Fontaine" or il ne s'agit pas vraiment de son nom mais d'une description.
Si vous regardez la fontaine déjà cartographiée, vous pouvez voir que c'est amenity=drinking_water qui indique que c'est une fontaine d'eau potable.

Plus d'infos sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Contribuer_aux_donn%C3%A9es_cartographiques
Et discussions sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

bonne journée
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
maraf24 (2022-10-11 07:20:37+00:00): Please don't put old historic german names into name:de
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Josef73 (2022-10-30 06:10:07+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tage amenity?
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 14:22:15+00:00): Thanks for reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126817245
Guy56 (2022-09-30 16:54:44+00:00): Hi, these are private (and forbidden to public) roads for which the owner does not wish to let them appear on OpenStreetMap due to criminal offences that occured.
Could you please suppress them again ?
Thank you in advance
Frans S (2022-10-02 10:03:59+00:00): Thanks for mapping here.
See my comments on changeset 126825991 . My comments are valid for most of your mappings here.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126820958
dcapillae (2022-09-30 13:51:47+00:00): Buenas tardes, Anon-4. Gracias por los cambios.

He ajustado el valor de la etiqueta «network» para hacerlo coincidir con el valor convencional «CTMAM». Véase «Rutas de bus en Provincia de Málaga» en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Rutas_de_bus_en_Provincia_de_M%C3%A1laga

Gracias por tu colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel
AkuAnakTimur (2022-10-08 14:59:33+00:00): You should have checked whether your re-alignment would fit another thing on the map just next to your scope of work e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7132391820
SonghuaRiver (2022-10-11 07:59:43+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur, thanks for reaching out. I agree that the alignment here should have been continued further. I’ll keep this in mind moving forward. Happy mapping!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-10-01 00:17:16+00:00): Hello.
This crosswalk doesn't seem correct.. Did you intend to map it like that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126822467
Szewah (2022-10-01 11:15:02+00:00): That absolutely isn't right. I added the lowered kerbs through the OSM Go Map! to the nodes. Thanks for flagging it up.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126822467
Stereo (2022-09-30 17:25:02+00:00): I do object to #nl :)
VLD548 (2022-10-07 12:01:57+00:00): I agree to use the spelling Haardter Wee. Thanks.
Frans S (2022-10-02 10:02:28+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.

Tagging of highways:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126822572
PLima785 (2022-09-30 14:55:26+00:00): Boa, eu depois afino ali na zona de Braga, eles não vão usar a actual estação em Braga mas vão fazer um mais para este.
Vi no site participa.pt
PLima785 (2022-09-30 14:55:45+00:00): Oeste*
PedroMTG13 (2022-09-30 15:06:08+00:00): Sim, isto é a base. Do Aeroporto até Nine é um percurso hipotético
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.