piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4004 (2017-09-15 23:57:27+00:00): Всем заинтересованным:
-в первую очередь необходимо проверить, что name=name:ru для будущего перехода автоматом. Если name!=name:ru, проверить какой из вариантов соответствует действительности и заполнить. При необходимости - перевести с другого name (если есть);
-перевести/заполнить name:be, в соответствии с подтверждаемой информацией/источниками;
-по желанию - заполнить name:be-tarask и прочие вариации. 
Первые 2 пункта наиболее важны, на них и предлагается сосредоточить усилия
user_6110846 (2017-09-16 13:57:18+00:00): Есть проблемное село в Хотимском раене Ново-Григорьевка. По белорусски не соотвествует русскому . Искать надо официальное название на белорусском или подтверждение что белоруссский  и русский разные  Можно конечно и перевести но это непрофессионально. 
В Телеграмме (респект ) дали неофициальный реестр по этом у вопросу - но я считаю надо найти официальное .
2 Поселок Владимировка и есму подобные поскольку там жителей 0 надо перетегировать по утвержденной схеме    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place%3Dlocality#.D0.97.D0.B0.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.BE.D1.88.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.B4.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.BD.D0.B8 (Заброшенные деревни )
yaugenka (2017-09-16 15:37:13+00:00): @Mykhailo, вам для справки. В одном районе может быть несколько нп с одним названием. Если они отличаются типом (поселок, деревня, снп) то тип нужно обязательно указать в поле name:prefix. Если и тип у них одинаковый, то нужно обязательно прописать addr:subdistirct=<название сельсовета>. Иначе будет невозможно их отличить.
user_6110846 (2017-09-16 17:24:43+00:00): Изучите правки мои в Хоцінскам раёне. Все о чем вы пишите  сделано мною изначально кроме сельсовета . Сейчас заново перегребаю район чтоб всем поставить сельсоветы
yaugenka (2017-09-17 17:01:28+00:00): Всем НП проставлять сельсовет большой надобности нету. Речь только о тех, у которых повторяется название в рамках одного района.
user_6110846 (2017-09-18 05:40:27+00:00): то что вы предлагаете, превратить карту в порнографию. Тег используется или нет. Предстоит  много подготовительной работы . И нет времени тратить времени на изучение  одно название в районе или два . Во вторых : наличие во всех тега сельсовет еще нужно потому ,  что  границы сельсоветов у вас не нарисованы и кто ищет поселок на карте его найдет как поселок какое-того района.
user_6110846 (2017-09-18 06:36:40+00:00): Яугенка всвязи с тем что іВовік занимается занимаеться расизмом ксенофобией и дискриминацией белорусского языка
yaugenka (2017-09-19 21:36:11+00:00): @Mykhailo, переименовывая addr:* и name:prefix на белорусский вы ломаете существующие программы. Откатывайте свои правки!
user_6110846 (2017-09-20 08:25:34+00:00): Праблема Беларусі я бачу не ў сферы тэхналогій, у у тым, што ў кіраўніцтве ўсіх інтэрнэт-праектаў сядзяць людзі якія атрымліваюць дадатковыя матэрыяльныя ўзнагароды з-за мяжы. Іх мэта: препятствывать ўваходжання беларускай мовы ў сучасным інтэрнэце-праекты, і ператварэнне яго ў мёртвай мове як лацінскі або царкоўнаславянская. 
Кіруюць гэтыя картографы па выпрабаванай часам савецкай сістэме: начальнік заўсёды мае рацыю, калі ён не мае рацыю, глядзі пункт першы.
Загадана ім, выкарыстоўвайце любыя самыя брудныя метады, але беларуская мова трэба выкінуць з інтэрнэт-тэхналогій назусім
, Парушаць Прынцып @on ground @ і зневажаць беларускую мову я- я супраць.
Картограф Jay пісаў мне што многія, у асабістых паведамленнях, дзякавалі за спробу спыніць чарговае здзек з беларускай мовай.

Праблемы з праграмнымі скрыптамі - гэтыя выдумкі вы пішыце для людзей, якія акрамя як уключыць-выключыць, і яшчэ некалькі простых функцый, больш нічога не ведаюць і не разумеюць у інтэрнэт-тэхналогіях. Я падчас дыскусіі рабіў вам, заўвагу, робіць паўторна: перастаньце дамагацца мэтаў шляху хлусні, іншы брудныя метады.

Ваша абарона рускай мовы - парушэнне on ground. Абараняючы парушэнне правілаў - вы знішчаеце праект і стварае перадумовы да войнаў правак
molind (2017-09-20 08:37:15+00:00): И обсуждение скатилось в флуд. Отписываюсь.
4004 (2017-09-20 09:43:36+00:00): собственно как и в телеграме. что то менять никто не договаривался
Jay May (2017-09-20 11:48:49+00:00): @4004 Which is why I asked for people in Telegram "where are we going" because it is such a mess that it's hard for everyone to get what we should do.
@Mykhailo @Yaugenka - STOP!
SomeoneElse (2017-09-20 21:24:13+00:00): Hi all - Andy from the Data Working Group here. A couple have people have mentioned the ongoing arguments about language names in Belarus to us, and we'd like to do what we can to help.  Obviously we're somewhat aware of the history here (and I've read the various numbers, some conflicting, on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Belarus ).  It may be that one solution won't work for the whole country, and that "name" may need to be BE in one place, RU in another (with of course name:be and name:ru being present in both).
Mobile maps will generally already render based on either name:be or name:ru, as does http://openstreetmap.by .  I'm sure it's been mentioned before, but for the avoidance of doubt the usual guidance on "what goes in the name tag" is based on http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  If anyone wants the DWG's guidance on particular places then please email data@osmfoundation.org , and explain why you think that a "name" as it currently is in OSM.  If you can provide evidence (perhaps a photograph of a Belarussian road sign, or evidence that most people in a place speak Russian) then please include that too, and we'll do what we can to help reach the best compromise we can.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Jay May (2017-09-21 06:25:22+00:00): Hi Andy. 
I've already sent such pics around a week ago. Please ask your colleague Frederik Ramm. In case you need them again, I can send them once more :)
In short, asI had already told, toponyms are usually in Belarusian (cities, towns, villages, rivers, lakes...) while commercial names are mostly in Russian and translating them makes no sense IMHO. Sometimes in Belarusian, sometimes in English, French, Polish, etc.
If you'd need more details, don't you guys hesitate in asking me :) Kind regards,
LLlypuk82 (2017-09-21 13:38:55+00:00): Stop, guys. What about our local agreement which was reached in same time as road signs was already in belorussian?
Nothing is changed still. There is no reason to avoid the agreement. Photos have no sense in this case.
Jay May (2017-09-22 05:36:58+00:00): The local agreement was perhaps good in a certain context back in 2009. But the context has changed.
user_6110846 (2017-09-24 10:06:56+00:00): To improve an electronic geographical map ONLY on signboards confirms the Belarussian WIKI-RULE
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82_%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B8
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 19:34:48+00:00): For info, I've just posted this to the BE forum:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=665838#p665838

All feedback (from everyone who hasn't already commented) gratefully received.
Maturi0n (2017-10-01 09:33:27+00:00): I think the most important factor here should be what the local OSM community wants. People from other countries (Poland, Ukraine, Russia, etc) shouldn't dictate the Belarusian community which language they use as their main mapping language. If they agreed to use Russian, this should be respected. And such issues shouldn't be resolved in a changeset discussion anyway.
Jay May (2017-10-02 06:07:55+00:00): @Maturi0n - I’m aware your heart beats more for the Russian language to be left, but this is not a matter of the local community wanting or not wanting something (and anyway most of the guys who discuss with us do support the Belarusian language or a full ground truth rule). OSM is neither a local project, neither an ethnographic nor linguistic project. Hence, we cannot afford to think only about local communities nor map freaks like you and me. Lots of apps are using the wrong data so far because of us, and thus showing an alternative “wannabe” reality. We have the chance to change it and IMHO we should seize it. That’s all.
user_6110846 (2017-10-02 08:33:13+00:00): Now the rule according to signs "decides at the earth" works or not. Or the precedent which will do to other countries by a push is created, the fact that there is a wish. Especially it is dangerous to territories of the conflicts where the tomahawk of wars of changes is dug. The Belarusian community - isn't better, it isn't worse than others. The Belarusian community shows, що they "the highest race" of which everything is possible, and other communities "lowest race". If the Belarusian community officially writes as the obligation to all that we will change names of the cities of villages for example about New Year - then the discussion would be ended. But there is no it. Therefore it is also necessary to press on the Belarusian community that they were as all are equal before rules.
user_6110846 (2017-10-02 08:39:52+00:00): in Russian Сейчас решаеться  правило по знакам "на земле " работает или  нет. Или создается  прецедент, который будет толчком другим странам делать , то что хочется. Особенно это опасно для територий конфликтов , где  томагавк войн правок закопан. Белорусское сообщество - не лучше , не хуже других . Белорусское сообщество  демонстрирует  , що они  "высшая  раса" которой можно все,  а другие сообщества "низшая  раса" . Если б белорусское сообщество официально  написало как обязательство перед всеми , что мы названия городов сел поменяем сами например до Нового Года - тогда б дискуссия была окончена. Но этого нет . Поэтому и приходится давить на белорусское сообщество, что б они были как все равны перед правилами.
literan (2017-09-08 13:37:56+00:00): Добрый день! Странно как-то получилось - какие-то обрубки открытые, на дублере, и на съезде с МКАД в область
KooLru (2017-09-08 13:48:48+00:00): Добрый!
С мостом прошу прощения - не доглядел.
А в область (ближе к рынку) пока закрыто. Дорога есть, и даже один раз я по ней ездил, но не записал трек (точнее затер). Заканчивается она немного подругому.
Как откроют - я поправлю.
literan (2017-09-08 15:27:08+00:00): я тут строящиеся дороги прорисовывал по ПОД с хорошей привязкой. Так что можно их переводить в статус открытых, а не рисовать заново
KooLru (2017-09-08 15:33:21+00:00): Я заново не собираюсь рисовать.
Открытых там только с Калужкского на внешний МКАД (которая не прорисована). Тоннель пока не едет, вдоль рынка не едет (ограждение делают).
KooLru (2017-09-08 15:34:27+00:00): Съезд на мегу с калужского перед путепроводом тоже "закрыт был" - грузовиком закрыто было.
treestryder (2017-09-18 14:34:16+00:00): Love the work on cycling features. Thanks!

During a concert, at Adado Park, I considered making the same change. Using this section of trail (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518695910) I experimented with the tags I thought appropriate. But never got around to completing thought.
eggie (2017-09-08 07:07:51+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 07:12:23+00:00): foot=yes hoeft niet op een voetpad. bicycle=no kan er ook af.
Wanneer het niet een paadje is zonder blauw bord wandelpad kun je het beter taggen als highway=path
Succes verder...
Russ McD (2018-12-17 09:37:06+00:00): Way: 254090301 - Mr. VLD007 of Facebook.  We local guys drew this as a track. Using your unparalleled Californian local knowledge, you changed it to an unclassified road.
While the status can always be argued, the main issue is that it clearly has a dirt surface.  Now cars will try to route down it.
If you insist on changing the status our roads, kindly add the unpaved tag unless you have evidence to the contrary !
Russ
eggie (2017-09-08 06:58:05+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 07:05:17+00:00): De naam De Bioderij heb ik op de adresnode gezet. Verdere gegevens graag op de adresnode. Wat is de aard van de Bioderij.. craft? office=yes
Vragen kun je ook kwijt op het forum. Zie welkomstmail.
eggie (2017-09-08 06:49:19+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 06:52:42+00:00): Houd er svp rekening mee dat de BING 2017 foto niet helemaal goed ligt, maar iets verschoven. Beter is het dan de kadaster pdok 2016 te gebruiken.
mxcube (2017-09-08 16:05:34+00:00): Ja is goed, zal ik doen. Bedankt voor de tip. Ik ben hier nog nieuw mee dus ik vind het fijn om feedback te krijgen
neuhausr (2017-09-08 18:24:22+00:00): Thanks for fixing. Are the road ways that connect to the bridge correct too? They are tagged cycleway=lane.
brendanbikes (2017-09-08 18:51:19+00:00): They should be updated to track on the westerly side of the bridge, between the bridge and Riverside Avenue. The eastbound side of the bridge is still closed unfortunately, but the whole segment is protected on both sides between Riverside and East River Parkway. I'll update that now.
neuhausr (2017-09-08 19:09:12+00:00): Thanks! I haven't been that way lately so haven't kept track of the changes.
brendanbikes (2017-09-08 19:28:14+00:00): I bike it most days and live in the area -- I was surprised no one had updated it yet, though the project was just completed this year.
marczoutendijk (2017-09-07 19:54:26+00:00): Welkom PB verstuurd.
marczoutendijk (2017-09-07 19:45:19+00:00): Welkom op OSM Alfred!
Graag je attentie voor het volgende:
Gebouwen en adressen worden in Nederland via de BAG op de kaart gezet. Daar is een heel team mee bezig en dat kun je hier lezen:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
Jij hebt nu op een aantal adresnodes een descriptie toegevoegd, maar die moet je niet aan het adres hangen maar aan het gebouw!
Maar dat is al gebeurd vanuit de BAG.
Wil je die dubbele informatie weer van de adresnodes afhalen?
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
marczoutendijk (2017-09-07 19:47:02+00:00): En ik bedoel natuurlijk Alfons!
Alan (2017-09-12 21:28:47+00:00): Should this be tagged as access=private or access=no, instead of deleting it?
Viajero Perdido (2017-09-13 18:37:32+00:00): Right, access=private.

Also, "(Private Road)", is inappropriate as part of a name, eg that road nearby.  That's what the access key is for.
a4a91120 (2018-07-20 11:40:01+00:00): The property owner is fed up with trespassers. How was this road mapped? Via trespassing. REMOVE IT AND KEEP OUT!
a4a91120 (2018-07-20 11:51:54+00:00): How would you like it if every year, you had to clean up after people leaving beer cans, tires, spray paint, and fluorescent tape, etc. The local RCMP and Muni Bylaw officer are aware and are prepared to assist in prosecution. Respect our private property!
eerib (2023-07-06 05:53:19+00:00): Hello all,

I have essentially reverted the unintentional vandalism edits in this area with additions of better data.

Please note that removal of private roads and paths is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. OSM is used by emergency services including the BC RCMP, BC Ambulance, BC Wildfire Service, Search & Rescue, and others and having the data is important for their work.

Cheers, eerib
eggie (2017-09-08 06:28:00+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
rmikke (2017-09-08 22:07:54+00:00): Jeśli to ograniczenie z powodu szkoły, to ograniczenie tylko w jednym kierunku wydaje się podejrzane. Jesteś pewien, że w drugą stronę można jechać 50?
PiooiP (2017-09-09 06:07:51+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam to za skrzyżowaniem z ogrodową nie ma powtórzonego znaku więc nie ma ograniczenia ale na wszelki wypadek sprawdzę to przy pierwszej okazji.
eggie (2017-09-08 06:34:50+00:00): Probeer te voorkomen dat je de landuse=residential vastplakt aan andere vlakken. Dus goed inzoomen. 
Dit was je edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51823567
Pas ook het commentaar aan, want het gaat denk ik niet over die school.
Voor de import nieuwe school kun je een aanvraag indienen op het forum onder het draadje Verzoek BAG import. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-09-08 06:46:47+00:00): Ik heb wat losgemaakt van de wegen en de residential. Wellicht nog eens goed kijken naar de vorm van die sportvelden?
ralley (2017-09-08 01:02:20+00:00): Correct way to handle a private road would be to add access=private as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
ralley (2017-09-08 01:06:45+00:00): Further looking at this it seems to be a partial duplicate of an existing Abattoir Lane (zoom right in and you can see both).  Needs to be cleaned up
eggie (2017-09-08 06:24:53+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
rmikke (2017-09-08 22:28:43+00:00): Jest OK :D (prosiłeś o przejrzenie, to przeglądam ;) )

Aczkolwiek parkowanie przy ulicy można też załatwić tak: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:parking:lane 

A w kwestii zrodla:
Nie zebys cos zrobil zle, ale jak spojrzysz na opisy swoich zmian, to zobaczysz, ze iD dodaje do nich te informacje automatycznie, wiec nie ma potrzeby dorzucac tej informacji do obiektow. Tym bardziej, ze potem ktos obiekt zmieni na innej podstawie, a tag zostawi...
PiooiP (2017-09-09 05:58:57+00:00): Na wiki pisało żeby dodawać ten tag gdy korzysta się z tego podkładu dlatego dodałem. Będę pamiętał żeby nie dodawać więcej. Niestety dodałem go jeszcze do kilku obiektów.
rmikke (2017-09-09 06:16:45+00:00): Ale to nie jest źle, że go dodałeś, po prostu od jakiegoś czasu ma to mniej sensu (i.e. od momentu, kiedy edytory zaczęły automatycznie to dodawać do opisu zmian.
dgitto (2017-09-07 20:40:16+00:00): ci sono numeri duplicati, (vedi via rosate) inoltre i nomi delle vie sono rimasti in MAIUSCOLONE
MCalaOSM (2017-09-08 07:10:45+00:00): Ciao si lo so purtroppo infatti ho chiesto aiuto a artlas xké devo trovare un metodo più pratico e veloce, a proposito tu sai un metodo pratico e veloce x rinominare i nomi altro al quello tabellare, che sia più immediato xké vedo artlas e molto veloce. O è na mia impressione?

Tanti saluti

I civici dovrebbero essere 3 duplicati appena posso sistemo
k127 (2023-12-04 17:59:50+00:00): Hallo Michael Deckert,

du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz zwei Knoten erfasst, die jeweils ein `name` (und auch `description`) Tag haben, das sehr danach aussieht, als könnte es noch etwas aufgeschlüsselt werden:

* "TFW 016 - Grawandhütte 1640m / Zemmgrund"
* "TFW 018 - Maxhütte 1445m / Gunggl"


Das habe ich mal gemacht:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144764727
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144764801


Beste Grüße
k127
Øukasz (2017-09-13 20:58:09+00:00): highway cut into smaller pieces, recreated as new way segments
rmikke (2017-09-08 22:24:47+00:00): Nie zebys cos zrobil zle, ale jak spojrzysz na opisy swoich zmian, to zobaczysz, ze iD dodaje do nich te informacje automatycznie, wiec nie ma potrzeby dorzucac tej informacji do obiektow. Tym bardziej, ze potem ktos obiekt zmieni na innej podstawie, a tag zostawi...
PiooiP (2017-09-09 06:04:20+00:00): O tagowaniu przeczytałem w internecie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Geoportal.gov.pl
może warto byłoby zmienić tam opis żeby następni nie popełniali tego błędu.
rmikke (2017-09-08 22:23:50+00:00): Nie zebys cos zrobil zle, ale jak spojrzysz na opisy swoich zmian, to zobaczysz, ze iD dodaje do nich te informacje automatycznie, wiec nie ma potrzeby dorzucac tej informacji do obiektow. Tym bardziej, ze potem ktos obiekt zmieni na innej podstawie, a tag zostawi...
b-jazz (2018-08-31 00:32:05+00:00): Hi. I just stumbled across this change and was wondering. Is that reservoir really named "Last Change"? Seems like "Last Chance" would be a more appropriate name. Possible typo?
baradam (2018-08-31 04:50:26+00:00): Hi, some way or another this must have gotten copied and pasted into this reservoir by accident. I check my four sources of Hydrography and didn't find this named. Also, usually when I add names I usually give sources if not from Tiger information.

I removed the name since you said it was one of my items.
b-jazz (2018-08-31 05:12:50+00:00): Ah, that's too bad. Last Chance Reservoir would be a great name for it too. Thanks for the correction.
muralito (2017-09-08 02:12:29+00:00): ¿Porque borraste el nuevo trazado de la ruta?

¿Why did you delete the new shape of the route?
GisManiac (2017-09-08 04:09:29+00:00): Oh I'm sorry. I drove by a few weeks ago and I haven't noticed this work. Is it new?if so please accept my apologies
muralito (2017-09-09 12:04:09+00:00): Thanks, no problem. The aerial imagery in this area is very old. I saw the new bridge when it was in construction in 2015, so when another user draw it last year I just assumed it was opened to traffic, and that probably your changes were based on old imagery. The old bridge was narrow, as are several other bridges on Ruta 5, so in the last few years new ones are being build, or planned their construction.
marczoutendijk (2017-09-08 12:23:59+00:00): En wees niet bang om zaken op het forum te vragen. We kunnen genoeg mappers gebruiken.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:55:26+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd en waarschuwing
eggie (2017-09-08 06:21:22+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
arcth (2017-09-08 21:58:09+00:00): Hello HellMap,

Actually, these addresses were correct. Please consider an address in Silmala[1]: the part inside quotation marks -- Silmala 223 -- is the house name.

[1]: https://www.kadastrs.lv/buildings/search?cad_num=80330020789001
HellMap (2017-09-08 22:53:57+00:00): Hello,
I was looking into this as I was trying to determine how to fill out the addresses in nearby hamlets. I went over to look at what they actually are in reality (see below). The best I can tell is that those are not real house names. Something like "Rožkalni"[1] is -- you can see it does not have either street or hamlet number, while surrounding houses do. Otherwise, they would be in "Vietvārdu datubāze"[2]. My experience has been that kadastrs.lv mangles addresses due to their own system shortcomings when they cannot organize them correctly for whatever reason and have to resort to novel naming schemes (my own property is like that where actual address is 10-5, but kadastrs lists it as 10D, though nobody, even utility contracts, list it that way).

In case of Silmala 223, the hamlet/village is "Silmala" and the house number is 223 without a street name. If it had a street number, it would likely be Rīgas iela 11 or something, but you wouldn't say "Rīgas iela 11" is the house name. With that "Rožkalni" example, you can see the nearby houses have both the street number and the hamlet number.

If we go by full modern property street plates, they (not that I checked every one) have a prominent number with additionally both hamlet name and street name listed.[3] Since OSM--in theory--goes by what we see on the ground, then we would expect the plate to say "Silmala 143" as a single name if that was the name. In fact, 223 is just a number plate[4] (though I realize we are only using it as example here). I find that this is the case for the properties in this and other nearby hamlets, like nearby Banga, Selga, etc. In fact, most have just a number[4][5] and some don't have anything visible.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51827482#map=18/57.25089/24.45043
[2] https://vietvardi.lgia.gov.lv
[3] https://imgur.com/a/lOX5I
[4] https://imgur.com/ajSlhlB
[5] https://imgur.com/ARDZP19
[6] https://imgur.com/vYVZl3W