piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vincent de Phily (2022-09-19 19:39:48+00:00): Sorry, I thought the node/way links were enough context, changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126361633 

AFAIUI a turning circle implies [some kind of widening](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle) to make vehicle manoeuvres easier. There is nothing of the kind here.

In fact, this alleyway is hardly suitable for cars. Only a Micra with a skilled driver could hope to get there unscratched. I use it weekly and the only "motorized vehicles" I ever saw were electric scooters.

I had a look though the gate today, it's a concrete yard but I don't think a car is ever parked there. Not sure what the white shape on satellite was. Access an parking is easy at the front of the houses.

It could still make sense to micro-map these garden/backyard gates if we start mapping all the walls, but I don't think they'd deserve to connect to the highways.
danieldegroot2 (2022-09-19 20:16:07+00:00): Feel free to add footways to each one of them, but there's not really any need for it. ;-)
mapper999 (2022-09-17 22:09:44+00:00): Hallo,
aber Vorsicht in Verbindung mit vehicle=forestry etc, das gilt in OSM dann auch für bicycle, z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452908910 . Es gibt einige Stellen im Hardtwald, die mit Vz 250 und "Fahrräder frei" o.ä. beschildert sind. An anderen Stellen hängt wieder "Waldweg Gesperrt" für Motorfahrzeuge teilweise + Reiter/Gespanne. Leider alles sehr unübersichtlich :(
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
mcliquid (2022-09-20 08:53:12+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please, next time, save such edits separately. All other Mappers will thank you as then it wont cause history view glut anywhere else in between.

For your reading pleasure: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-17 09:08:02+00:00): Cosa indica il direction=clockwise su questa strada? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095429740#map=19/45.678460/13.419571 Ciao, Andrea
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-17 09:31:52+00:00): Sinceramente non ho minima idea. Questa strada era anni fa (fino a 7-8 anni fa) a senso unico. Dopo lì,nel bosco circostante iniziato Zamparini costruire area residenziale "Grado 2". Appena iniziato lavori, stato accusato che li portato terreno contaminato. Lavori stati fermati, frattempo alberi di nuovo cresciuti, oggi è di nuovo bosco. L'anno scorso vinto,non li portato terreno contaminato, però lui scomparso due anni fa.
Allora questa strada indicata e oggi percorribile solo a piedi, sulla bicicletta e con mezzi privati (chi ha chiavi dal cancello). 
Ho rimosso senso unico, perché oggi è a doppio senso.
Saluti
Polarbear-repair (2022-09-29 21:53:11+00:00): Was ist die Quelle für diese Änderung?
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2022-10-03 15:28:14+00:00): Quelle sind Fotos von Beschilderung von vor Ort sowie Überprüfung auf Mapillary
NieWnen (2022-09-18 10:56:35+00:00): Dzięki za zmianę, trochę poprawiłem tagowanie/geometrię/przecięcia. 

Widzę, że w okolicy może jeszcze nieco brakować (ścieżek + 2 duże obiekty obok parkingu) patrząc na dane z Geoportalu, jeśli masz wiedzę, jak przebiegają (i czy już są wybudowane), to zachęcam do dodania, w razie problemów/wątpliwości śmiało pytaj :).
maciek-szn (2022-09-17 19:18:14+00:00): Ponownie wycofane i ponownie proszę o merytoryczne opisy zmian.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-17 16:40:23+00:00): Linia ("Lina" do poprawy) nie zawiera żadnych przystanków oprócz tego jednego.
maciek-szn (2022-09-17 19:19:09+00:00): Wycofane.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:08:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156769328/history has surface = pflasterstein that was added in this edit
Is it surface=sett or is it surface=paving_stones in this case? Or maybe surface=unhewn_cobblestone? Or maybe something else?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
kakiremora (2022-10-09 19:22:39+00:00): Dlaczego całe lotnisko zostało oznaczone jako landuse=military?
Lotnisko jest w dużej mierze używane jako cywilne

Pzodrawiam
ruugie (2022-09-18 15:34:20+00:00): Wurde der Weg abgerissen, oder nur mit einem Zaun gesperrt?
Nearby0051 (2022-09-18 15:54:29+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3363429#map=17/
Luftbild sieht alles entfernt aus
mcliquid (2022-09-20 08:53:09+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please, next time, save such edits separately. All other Mappers will thank you as then it wont cause history view glut anywhere else in between.

For your reading pleasure: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
mlktou (2022-09-20 15:20:09+00:00): Hello, and sorry for that. I didn't know that it saved together ! I'll be carefull next time. Thank you
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
gscholz (2022-09-20 07:04:18+00:00): Hi nicolas:D,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-72.91033&lat=5.74302&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126306663

CAn you polease fix this?

I am wondering about how this could happen as you are using JOSM which typically shows error messages if you try to upload such data.
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-29 17:34:28+00:00): Hi nicolas:D,
I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
vmicho (2022-09-30 08:27:45+00:00): Hi. The crossing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095442152) is no longer there since the overpass is in operation (more than 1 year).

was previously removed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118624342

Please remove ;)
Frans S (2023-01-17 11:09:35+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your work again and am sorry to say that your mapping quality has not improved. 
Please map more accurate at next mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126306807
martinst (2022-09-17 19:13:40+00:00): Bitte keine im Luftbild sichtbaren Wege löschen. Wenn sie verfallen sind können sie z.B. zu abandonend:highway=path geändert werden.
Revertiert in Changeset: 126310127
andi mundt (2022-09-17 19:52:37+00:00): Hi martinst, danke für die Berichtigung. Wir hatten zu spät bemerkt, dass sich auf dem Luftbild tatsächlich dort (allerdings auch an vielen anderen Stellen) Wegspuren befinden, aber wie man die Änderung korrigiert war nicht gleich rauszufinden.
Julien39 (2024-07-12 08:28:46+00:00): Bonjour Lejun, tu es sûr que ce chemin s'appelle le Sentier Jacquot ?
Il y en a un tout près, à Sergenaux, près de l'étang Jacquot :
https://www.cpie-bresse-jura.org/sejour/sentier-etang-jacquot/
Lejun (2024-07-12 12:34:29+00:00): Je sais pas j'y ai jamais mis les pieds. J'ai juste découpé les landuses depuis chez moi
Julien39 (2024-07-12 12:59:20+00:00): OK merci. J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté un official_name, je pensais donc que tu connaissais le coin
Lejun (2024-07-12 13:21:09+00:00): Ah tiens, c'est vrai. Du coup je viens de vérifier et c'est le nom indiqué par le cadastre, qui diffère de la BD topo. Libre à toi de modifier.
Julien39 (2024-07-12 13:22:59+00:00): Merci, je vais creuser ! :)
Skylark_H_C (2023-08-28 05:24:55+00:00): 按照wiki的说法，会不会
highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=* + footway=sidewalk
这样会好些？
参考页面：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Cycleway_and_footway_on_sidewalk
hmsy39 (2023-08-29 02:31:35+00:00): 此段骑行道路（非机动车沥青路）和人行道路（石砖路）并不是共用的关系，或许不合适？
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:55:57+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
marc__marc (2023-01-30 22:25:41+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095453829
I usggest pratice_pitch without a uppercase :)
Regards,
Marc
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:56:58+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:57:05+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
Frans S (2022-09-19 08:25:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and precise mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126308744
Frans S (2022-09-19 08:25:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and precise mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126308744
Marek-M (2022-09-20 09:20:37+00:00): Cześć, do paczkomatu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7858066099 dodałeś tag description z zawartością prawdopodobnie wklejoną (pewnie ze strony InPost). Niestety wrzuciłeś do opisu również niewidoczny znak nowej linii (tzw. enter), co jest błędem - na obrazku https://imgur.com/zMoTM8e pokazałem gdzie on się schował. Proszę o uważniejsze wprowadzanie danych.

Ten paczkomat już poprawię, proszę o ostrożność przy kolejnych edycjach.

Pozdrawiam.
bxl-forever (2022-09-25 08:03:07+00:00): Hello,

No need to force postcode and city names manually on every object in OSM.  It makes no sense to clutter the database by repeating the same information on thousands of objects.

Check out this relation: every house within this perimeter is automatically recognized as "4000 Liège".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14405167
;-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
tux67 (2022-09-18 09:32:28+00:00): Hi,

ist die Riesen-Baustelle da inzwischen ganz weg?

Gruß
tux67
jimmyhendrix (2022-09-18 09:44:56+00:00): Moin,
gestern war dort offizielle Eröffnungsfeier:
https://www.meine-woche.de/staedte/moenchengladbach/eroeffnungsfeier-platz-der-republik-moenchengladbach_aid-76780667
Ich war allerdings selber nicht vor Ort.

https://www.planergruppe-oberhausen.de/mg-platz-der-republik/ Hier gibt es Pläne, könnte man, bis jemand vor Ort oder es neue Luftbilder gibt, danach mappen.
VG
tux67 (2022-09-18 10:01:21+00:00): Danke.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:58:29+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
mavl (2022-09-19 13:25:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Просто пример. Эта улица "Лесная" названа не честь леса, а в честь посёлка, внутри которого она находится:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049849946
mavl (2022-09-18 13:31:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извините, что встреваю, но этот пакет правок для "Полевой улицы" добавляет ссылку на статью "Поле". То есть не на статью, посвящённую Полевой улице. Это так задумано?
M!dgard (2024-11-30 15:58:42+00:00): Hi, you've changed locker=luggage on this node to locked=luggage, which is nonsensical. Please look at what you're doing, don't just try to "fix" as many Osmose reports as possible. They're not meant for that.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9933685680
porfiriopaiz (2022-09-18 21:40:24+00:00): Hola Mike Ortega.

¿Podrías ser un poco más descriptivo en los mensajes que agregas en las descripciones de tus cambios?

"actualizacion" dice muy poco o nada de lo que sea que estás "actualizando"

Saludos,
Porfirio
VictorIE (2022-12-09 03:30:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7813507928/history

Pharmacy + deli in one node? :)
literan (2022-09-18 10:29:09+00:00): добрый день

теги bicycle=yes
foot=yes - лишние. Это значения по умолчанию для всех дорог и дорожек. Уберу.
MxxCon (2022-09-19 06:50:40+00:00): Hello.
Those small "antenna" segments between sidewalk and crosswalk are still considered sidewalk so it's ok to tag them as such.. 🙂👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126310584
eggie (2022-09-17 20:52:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2022-09-19 07:05:01+00:00): Hello.
Generally, around NYC it's better to use Bing imagery instead of Mapbox since Bing is more up-to-date and better aligned to the actual gps coordinates.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126310694
disc24 (2022-09-21 11:45:13+00:00): Hallo Steven,
bitte beim Setzen von access=private darauf achten, dass auch eine entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden sein sollte. Man sollte dieses Tag nicht setzen, nur weil ein Weg in Privatbesitz ist. Navis ignorieren meistens solche Wege und die Anwohner und Paketdienste können hier u.U. nicht hinein navigieren.
Es gibt da gerade aktuell auch eine Diskussion im Forum dazu. Vlt. kannst Du da mal reinschauen. Da werden verschiedene Ansichten dazu diskutiert.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/komoot-access-claims-access-private/2824
Viele Grüße
Dirk
stevensugar (2022-09-21 12:28:08+00:00): Hallo Dirk,
ich fahre endlos viele Sackgassen etc. tatsächlich ab, da ich an der wandrer earth challenge teilnehme mit dem Ziel, alle Wege meiner Stadt zu fahren. Dabei bin ich schon nicht zimperlich. Wenn es jedoch ein Schild: Privat, betreten verboten gibt oder das Grundstück umzäunt ist, habe auch ich Skrupel. 
In dem konkreten Beispiel ist der Weg durch eine Schrankenanlage von der restlichen Straße abgetrennt und es handelt sich offensichtlich um ein Firmengelände. 
Wir wohnen z.B. am Waldrand und ich würde auch jubeln, wenn jetzt alle über unser Grundstück in den Wald laufen würden.
Anders sieht das sicherlich bei Waldwegen etc. aus. Dort setze ich das Tag aber auch nicht. Ebenfalls werden teilweise Zufahrten ab der Grundstücksgrenze nicht korrekt markiert. Denke, es hilft auch keinem weiter, wenn der Weg noch 10 m weiter geht und trotzdem im nichts ändert.

VG

Christian
disc24 (2022-09-22 05:48:25+00:00): Hallo Christian,
aufgefallen war mir auch eher der Bereich der Kalköfenstraße zur Hönnetalstraße hin. Da können die Hausnummern 6 bis 20 ja theoretisch nicht erreicht werden, was eigentlich ziemlich ungewöhnlich ist. Allerdings ist da das privat Tag da auch von jemand anderem vor einem Jahr gesetzt worden.
Viele Grüße
Dirk
Orblivion (2024-09-25 20:30:02+00:00): I visited node 10032246172 which you marked as a viewpoint here. It didn't seem especially like a viewpoint to me. It's placed just off-trail in a wooded area. Not much to look at, with trees blocking most things. Just the intersection of some trails, not at a small peak or cliff. Was it a mistake? I can post pictures if you'd like.
ruugie (2022-09-17 19:56:14+00:00): Are you observing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F ?
user_389895 (2022-09-17 20:48:33+00:00): Yes, I am aware of this.
All my mass edits are not touching any existing tags, just adding new tags (Name:etymology:wikidata) to streets in Russia. Something that is near impossible to do one by one (given hundreds and thousands of them).
I share some of your concerns about local awareness, so I do add only most generic and common in Russia etymology definitions, leaving most of the others to local experts.
My regrets if this makes you worry; I hope there should be some validators that could show these edits as non-harmful (as they are not changing things,just adding).
Thank you for caring about OSM quality! :)
user_389895 (2022-09-17 21:34:11+00:00): P.S. Before doing this I've spent several days mapping manually thousands of streets in my home city (Ulyanovsk) and several other Russian cities and villages to became accustomed with common and edge cases and see what could be done to cover the whole country (well, actually just for my liking of etymology :))
I am aware, that ordinary 'wikidata' tag is never to be bulk-edited, as every street may have it's unique history. But 'name:etimology:wikidata' is different in a way, that it specify generics semantic for the name of many streets (Q7777019 Meadow for all the "Meadow street"s in this case), so I see mass edit as a necessity rather than danger in such cases.
After all, I don't expect these my edits to cause any conflicts, as street names etimology in Russia was pretty nonexistent in OSM before this.
To be on a safe side I always use geocodeArea:"Russia" to limit the area and strict equality checks (not regexes) for street names, to be sure not to touch anything unplanned.
I also care! :)
SomeoneElse (2022-09-18 14:34:51+00:00): > Yes, I am aware of this. 

OK, please link to where you had the discussion with the local community.
mavl (2022-09-19 13:32:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вероятно, что эта "Центральная улица" названа не в честь центра, а в честь посёлка.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296050108
habi (2022-09-18 08:30:56+00:00): Ciao Anthony VH

It's not necessary to name the `amenity=drinking_water` as 'Drinking water`.
I've removed the names in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126321838

Happy mapping,
habi
Anthony VH (2022-09-18 09:41:48+00:00): Thank, did not know! Won't name them in the future.
habi (2022-09-19 19:29:03+00:00): No worries!
Names that describe things are usually not necessary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Happy mapping!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-17 21:21:08+00:00): Hi,

Please don't name things like "local forest". Names are supposed to be the actual name of a place, not a description of it. Would you mind removing the name? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-17 21:22:59+00:00): You also changed this building to be a wood, which is incorrect. Please fix this as well https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087064217
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 13:45:53+00:00): Amazing my friend! keep up the good work! Thanks for cleaning the spams and wrong POIs!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126311544
Nawfal85 (2022-09-18 15:29:34+00:00): Thank you for your support
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-07 09:20:14+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3820934 if you are still nearby?
emersonveenstra (2022-09-17 21:22:07+00:00): Hi,

If you drew a parking area, there's no need to put an extra parking node. Would you mind removing the parking node please? Thanks!
Udarian (2022-09-17 20:25:41+00:00): also reclassified some roads and  updated geometry and tagging of residential roads in the area though there is still allot of work in the area for this specifically.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:59:24+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:59:32+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Thanks.
VA00 (2023-07-15 10:44:14+00:00): Natrafiłem dziś na znaki piesego szlaku zielonego, sprawdzam co to za szlak, a tu wychodzi, że czerwony: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2268895 Ten twór na terenie małopolski na pewno nie istnieje, więc zaraz skasuję jego resztki w Mętkowie i Bobrku. Pytanie do Ciebie czy w ogóle istnieje, a jeżeli tak, to dokąd sięga?