piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Digne (2018-01-11 20:24:46+00:00): Ik zou hier aanraden de boomgaard om te zetten in bosbouw (landuse=forest). De apple_tree tag kan blijven staan. Alleen in plaats van trees=apple_tree, zou het species=apple_tree moeten zijn.

Veel succes met mappen verder!
Digne (2018-01-11 20:25:34+00:00): (Boomgaard is meer bedoeld voor de landbouw.)
gedo78 (2018-01-11 23:48:21+00:00): Ik heb gezocht en vond vele discussies maar kon niet echt een eenduidige werkwijze voor deze kleine boomgaarden.

En is forrest niet te veel voor een tiental fruitbomen?
gedo78 (2018-01-11 23:48:42+00:00): Dank voor je reactie trouwens
Digne (2018-01-12 13:07:48+00:00): Bij boomgaarden zouden die bomen er moeten staan voor voedselproductie. Als die appeltjes gewoon geplukt worden en geconsumeerd, zou je het punt kunnen maken dat dit echt een "orchard" is. 

Voor de rest hebben we voor elk ander soort vlak met bomen landuse=forest, daarbij wordt niet naar de grootte gekeken.
viloan (2018-01-11 10:30:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
habi (2020-10-01 13:39:57+00:00): Hey; You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5332987923/ as shop=yes without any other information.
Do you have some more information on it?

I came here via https://maproulette.org/challenge/9400/
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Hjart (2018-01-11 10:50:29+00:00): Brug venligst ikke navnefeltet til at beskrive ting: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things.

Her har du navngivet to stier "Sti". Det bliver vi nødt til a slette igen
abakus_uploader (2018-01-11 23:30:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2018-01-11 16:13:22+00:00): Het blijft kennelijk lastig om niet te plakken. :)
Probeer het eens met potlatch2. 
Hier zie je waar het pad weer vast zit. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55348921
Supaplex (2018-01-21 12:22:50+00:00): 抱歉，你誤動到既有圖徵。您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。


編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features


由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。


台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/


Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2018-01-21 12:25:07+00:00): https://m.facebook.com/idclass.umemura/?locale2=zh_TW
viloan (2018-01-11 11:14:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2018-01-21 12:34:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
ftrebien (2018-01-11 11:31:54+00:00): http://www.trensurb.gov.br/paginas/galeria_projetos_detalhes.php?codigo_sitemap=42
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-01-11 11:38:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
andygol (2018-02-04 20:12:03+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55349576
Truchin (2018-02-09 13:06:08+00:00): Bonjour

La place de la Bastille n'est pas un giratoire (is not a roundabout).

J'ai corrigé

Bonne continuation

T. Ruchin
OF0 (2018-01-12 09:18:39+00:00): und am Landuse vandaliert
melcomsx (2018-01-13 07:48:46+00:00): Hallo,
war nicht so gedacht, an welcher Stelle ist es mir denn passiert?
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis
OF0 (2018-01-13 11:21:58+00:00): Praktisch überall wurde die Dorffläche von den Wegen gelöst, darüber hinaus gezogen und damit die angrenzeneen Landuses überlagert. (Version #9 des landuse=residental· Änderungssatz #55349633) geosperb kann es nicht gewesen sein. Die Opentopomap hat zur Zeit den Stand 30. November und da war offensichtlich noch alles OK. Dessen Anderungen waren vor etwa 8 Monaten.
melcomsx (2018-01-14 07:54:58+00:00): OK, ist mir gar nicht aufgefallen das es mir passiert ist, habe eigendlich nur an einer Ecke das landuse etwas verschoben. Werde etwas besser darauf achten.
Lokai (2018-01-14 09:22:57+00:00): Hallo,
bei Pülfringen (ich habe nur dort mit JOSM geschaut) teilen landuse häufig mit higway die Knoten. Sieht gut aus, macht jedoch später die Bearbeitung aufwendiger, oder durch Verschiebung fehleranfällig. Verkleben wird daher von User mitlerweile gemieden.
OF0 (2018-01-14 12:02:55+00:00): Hallo Wegabschneider

[...] bei Pülfringen (ich habe nur dort mit JOSM geschaut) teilen landuse häufig mit higway die Knoten. [...]

Ich behaupte mal in der Region nicht nur häufig sondern fast ausschließlich.

[...] Sieht gut aus, [...]

Erst mal bildet es die Realität hinsichtlich der Beziehung zwischen way und landuse genauer ab. Es befindet sich in der Realität kein Streifen nichts zwischen dem Way, welcher durch eine Linie repräsentiert wird und deren zweite Dimenson gemäß Wiki durch das width-Tag anzugeben ist. Der Renderer ist für das Verdrängen verantwortlich. Er ist im Endeffekt auch für das von Dir erwähnte gute Aussehen verantwortlich. Du willst Doch auch hoffentlich nicht andeuten, dass die Straßenflächen durch ein belassen eines Spaltes zwischen way und landuse dargestellt werden sollen.


[...] macht jedoch später die Bearbeitung aufwendiger, [...]

Selbst wenn das in jedem Fall so wäre, was ich bestreite, wäre das kein Grund falsch zu mappen. Das Teilen von Knoten stellt einen ausgewogeneren Kompromiss zwischen Aufwand beim Mappen und der Pflege und der Abbildung der Realität in der Datenbank dar.

[...] oder durch Verschiebung fehleranfällig.[...]

Hier verstehe ich leider nicht ganz auf was Du hinaus willst. Ein anschauliches Beispiel wäre vielleicht nützlich.

[...] Verkleben wird daher von User mitlerweile gemieden. [...]

Ich führe das eher auf eine breite Falschinformationwelle zurück, welche neuen Usern, auch ich wäre fast ein Opfer geworden, entgegenschlägt. Sobald ein neuer User diesen Mappingstil wählt, wird im erzählt, es sei Konsens, dass die Landuses nicht mit den Wegen zu verbinden seien. Das stimmt nicht. Im Wiki wird der Dissens ausdrücklich hervorgehoben. Niemand wird gerne verarscht. So mancher Neue wird sich aufgrund dieses Verhaltens "Alter Hasen" von OSM abgewendet haben. Dann kommen noch die von der  Mappingphilosophie motivierten "Fehlermeldungen" von JOSM dazu. Das stellt für mich die niedrigste Stufe..., ..., ...
Ich habe mich häufiger in Changsetkommentare eingeklingt, in denen neue User durch "Weglassen" relevanter Informationen dazu bewegt werden sollten das Teilen von Nodes zu unterlassen. Wenn Du noch wirklich neue Argumente hast, welche einem Teilen von Knoten entgegensprechen gerne. Bedenke aber das dies kein Echtzeitkommunikationssystem ist und Antworten von mir ggf. erst nach Stunden erfolgen. Siehe bitte zunächst auch 
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4945640&commented
InfosReseaux (2018-01-13 16:43:46+00:00): Thanks for this update and for your detailed description of railways in this area :)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Thibault Rommel (2022-01-07 11:12:41+00:00): op basis van wat zou men hier niet met de fiets mogen rijden tussen bepaalde uren?
Jakka (2022-01-07 12:37:40+00:00): Dat is al een tijd geleden. Ik voeg dat maar toe als de verkeerbord aangeeft. Staat onder de tijdsaanduiding denk dat yes ipv no moet zijn
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9470083,3.1251682,3a,19.3y,288.49h,89.79t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srHqSECqN7GA67nyn0PrbQQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DrHqSECqN7GA67nyn0PrbQQ%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D134.12134%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
Thibault Rommel (2022-01-07 13:44:31+00:00): De tijdsaanduiding op het bord slaat slechts op hetgeen er vlak boven staat. In dit geval laden en lossen. Fietsers zijn hier dan ook steeds toegelaten. Dit is ook zo voorzien in het aanvullend reglement.
Jakka (2022-01-07 13:51:52+00:00): verdikke verkeerd begrepen. zwier er maar af.
Thibault Rommel (2022-01-07 13:53:23+00:00): Okay :P
Jakka (2022-01-07 13:59:14+00:00): Mocht je er nog tegen komen in de toekomst. Niet aarzelen Mogelijk denk fout herhaalt...
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-11 16:37:03+00:00): Oke... volhouden ..dan  word je vanzelf een ervaren mapper!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].