piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-09-02 13:27:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..  
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.. 
het Waspunt zal toch niet nog een Duitse naam hebben 'Waschsalon'

Die name:de= 'Waschsalon' beter verwijderen..
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 21:53:00+00:00): Removed name:de
Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2020-09-02 13:28:59+00:00): Beste OSM gast   Dat doe je toch niet in één changeset over heel Noord Holland.. Bovendien geef je weer niet aan wat je aan het doen bent en dat was wel afgesproken.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 13:35:08+00:00): Bruuzer Experienc  spelfout.
craft		window_construction
name		Vrijdag Vrij Montage
operator		meer  ????  Wie is Meer? 
Een wandelpad door het water met naam Jachthaven De Brasem?
Nodes met de naam sleepboot als punt op de weg??? 
Ik draai je bijdrage terug.
Doe nu eens één aanpassing of toevoeging. Sla dat op en vraag om een review.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 13:37:18+00:00): reverted by changeset #90307760
Houd je svp aan de afspraak die gemaakt is met de DWG!

MVG,
Eggie
marczoutendijk (2020-09-02 17:06:13+00:00): Beste Openstreetmap-gast,
Je "bewerkingen doen die nodig zijn" aan  OSM zijn uitermate twijfelachtig en vol met fouten zoals eggie je al duidelijk heeft laten weten. 
Als je volgende changeset er ook zo uitziet, zal ik je opnieuw moeten blokkeren, maar dan voor langere tijd.

Marc Zoutendijk  
namens:  
OpenStreetMap Foundation   
Data Working Group
Openstreetmap-gast (2020-09-02 17:25:53+00:00): Eggie, sorry maar dat looppad is een deel van de jachthaven
Openstreetmap-gast
Openstreetmap-gast (2020-09-02 17:30:10+00:00): En die steiger bij de brug leimuiden bestaat ook alleen ik heb hem schuin gemaakt hij hoort recht.
skyper (2020-09-05 15:22:02+00:00): Hallo

Kannst Du mir bitte erklären, wie Du Durchgangsbeschränkungen nur mit Luftbildern als Quelle eintragen kannst?

Welche Person hat den wann genau diese Änderungen überprüft?

Da dies nicht der einzige Fall ist, bin ich daran interessiert was ihr dagegen unternehmen wollt und bis wann ich mit den entsprechenden Anpassungen rechnen kann.

Da nicht davon auszugehen ist, dass alle Personen in der lokalen Gruppe Englisch spricht, bitte ich um eine Antwort in deutscher Sprache.

Leider habe ich bisher häufig nur Textbausteine mit zum Teil falschen Behauptungen als Antwort erhalten. Da ich dabei leider nicht weiß ob eine Person oder doch nur ein Industrieprodukt mir antwortet, bitte ich um selbst gewählte Worte. Dadurch würden auch meine Zweifel genommen, dass Du eventuell den Inhalt gar nicht gelesen oder geschrieben hast.

Danke und Grüße skyper
rababdul (2020-09-09 10:05:50+00:00): thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies, I have mistakenly added the private tag to the driveways. Please find the changeset() for the suggested modifications. After the feedback from the community, we have made the appropriate changes in the addition of private tags to driveways. we have a second level of review for changeset we have created. sorry, i am not aware of the German language. this is not an automated reply. we are manually going through your queries and replying them
Kovoschiz (2020-09-10 22:01:41+00:00): Please don't over-restrict to `access=no`broadly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90308801
DanGlover (2020-09-09 21:38:46+00:00): Hello -  W2 50 is mapped in the expected location at Praed Street - is the box at Chepstow Road W2 56?  (Probably a mistake by original mapper.)
Palgrave Peter (2020-09-11 08:16:28+00:00): Sorry, I cant help much here as I'm only adding collection times. I don't actually know where one can check on the ref no.
Diana IRM-ED (2021-06-17 01:44:16+00:00): Hi, Camello_AR. I Hope all is well. I found a highway crossing with this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/574874873), would you mind fixing this issue? or please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
Camello_AR (2021-06-17 12:04:46+00:00): Disculpe, pero en Argentina hablamos español, por lo que no entiendo su comentario.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-06-18 00:24:24+00:00): Hola, Camello_AR.

Espero que todo esté bien. Encontré un cruce de carretera con este cuerpo de agua antes, pero mi colega intentó solucionar este problema 
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/574874873),

 ¿le importaría solucionar este problema correctamente? o avíseme si hay alguna actualización en esta área. ¡Gracias y feliz mapeo!
Camello_AR (2021-06-18 16:04:24+00:00): No se cual es el problema, pero está correctamente etiquetado debido a que el camino es inundable. Posiblemente la herramienta utilizada esté mal diseñada y detecte errores inexistentes. ¿Por qué se meten a miles de kilómetros de su casa?
Incluso cortaron una laguna en 2.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-01 00:36:22+00:00): Olá, foi revertido agora. se observada anteriormente, a lagoa corta a estrada existente para que se torne um aviso ao JOSM. Você pode observar no seguinte link 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/574874873
agora foi revertido como os dados originais


obrigada
Mike Raust (2020-09-09 17:00:37+00:00): Are the minor power lines by Seandebasti deficient or why have you deleted them?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90308877
Oberaffe (2020-09-10 09:06:39+00:00): Yes most of the minor powerlines was wrong. I deleted the lines and reconstructed the area in a later changeset.
geri-oc (2020-09-16 09:20:17+00:00): oneway=alternate - oneway=alternating
eggie (2020-09-02 14:32:55+00:00): De tagging is nu oke.. Evt. het verkeersbord erbij 
traffic_sign=NL:G12a

Wat bedoel je met een verkeersplateau.. een traffic_calming=table  ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Dtable

Dat kun je op de node aangeven.
Zal eens even spieken op de luchtfoto? 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 14:39:19+00:00): Ik kijk nog even, want de validator van JOSM (mijn editor)  geeft nog wat foutmeldingen op het traject Loire Taag. 
Gedupliceerde knopen op de weg. 
Zal even kijken hoe die tafels vastzitten.
Moment
eggie (2020-09-02 14:43:40+00:00): Er lagen twee 'tables' op elkaar op het grote kruispunt. Ook ontbrak de straatnaam Burg van Heugtenlaan. Ik heb het gerepareerd.
LucGommans (2025-07-31 22:51:52+00:00): Hey, sorry for the late question about your changeset but I see that you've used "avgspeed" instead of "maxspeed". What does that mean? Do these roads not have a maximum speed?
chnav (2025-08-01 05:14:51+00:00): Hi, as I remember the avgspeed was used to highlight actual achievable speed on the road. I couldn't set maxspeed due to missing information. Avgspeed was based on very few tracks from travellers and MUCH more of auto forum reports. It cannot be generated on the user side and takes a lot of personal effort, experience and detailed interpretation.
The purpose is to tune the for better routing in software and road quality mapping.
chnav (2025-08-01 05:20:00+00:00): (added) the roads quality in Kazakhstan are far from ideal. By law, the maximum speed on such roads is usually 100 kmph if not set by speed limit signs.
Mike Baggaley (2020-09-23 10:13:20+00:00): Hi, I do not think highway=historic is appropriate for roads that have been removed and have no historic interest. I suggest removed:highway or razed:highway would be better tags. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
user_8466505 (2020-09-03 04:06:17+00:00): Hey there! I just wanted to say thanks for adding this place to the map. At OpenStreetMap, we appreciate all people who add places to the map, especially in detail.

Happy mapping!
TheAdventurer64
Parzelle13 (2020-09-02 14:41:29+00:00): CS-Komentar verunglückt. + Details ergänzt.
Quelle: Mapillary (2019), ALKIS, PDOK- und Esri-Luftbilder
eggie (2020-09-02 14:47:38+00:00): Je bedoeling is goed, maar als je vlakken water gaat toevoegen op landuse bijt dat elkaar. het oort netjes te worden ingebed. Dat gaat met multipolygonen.
Het gras is dan de outer en het water wordt de inner. Schakel maar snel over naar een echte editor als JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Je kunt smalle sloten ook toevoegen op een lijnelement met waterway=ditch
eggie (2020-09-02 14:49:24+00:00): Als voorbeeld je water in een mp gezet als inner.. Met iD is dat allemaal lastig te doen.
olehz (2020-09-06 14:13:20+00:00): How many times should I tell you? Don't touch the roads!!! You ignore GPS-tracks and think that Maxar is an absolute truth. You don't improve, you make it worse!

Return it as it was. I'm tired to correct your "improvements" !!!
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-09-13 19:53:15+00:00): @olehz,
I do apologies if unintentionally the GPS- tracks have omitted in this edit. 
We also use GPS-tracks a lot, being an essential and an accurate source of editing. 
Thank you for your understanding.
user_11166885 (2020-09-02 21:16:33+00:00): Thanks for you adjustament!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90310498
eggie (2020-09-02 14:50:39+00:00): Oke.. als er geen verhoging is dan geen traffic_calming
eggie (2020-09-02 15:26:35+00:00): Hier zie je dat je gewoon een weg op weg hebt ingetekend https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90310674
eggie (2020-09-02 16:04:38+00:00): Duplicated way Loire verwijderd.  unclassified omgezet naar residential.
evdalen (2020-09-02 17:21:31+00:00): Okay dankjewel. Ik merk inderdaad dat ik een newbie ben.
eggie (2020-09-02 17:55:59+00:00): newbie gaat van zelf over... 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 14:54:47+00:00): Er is iets verkeerd gegaan met die Loire . Dat zijn nu twee wegen op elkaar geplakt. Kun je dat zelf aanpakken. We noemen dat duplicated ways.
Geen idee hoe je dat voor elkaar hebt gekregen.
Probeer het aan te pakken. Lukt het niet dan doe ik dat wel. Vanaf de aansluiting met fietspad Bermweg loopt het dubbel richting huisnr 4 en verder tot nr 40
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:59:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90311323
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:30:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90311374
Cucazer (2020-09-06 20:34:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90128911 and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Nbhc3DVk8GQrZfC2t7CaTu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90311470
ticki_52 (2021-10-11 18:18:54+00:00): Hi Daniel, ich sehe gerade, dass Du vor einiger Zeit an den Streuobstwiesen um den Ungeheuerhof herum dran warst. Ich hab' mal die aktuelle Situation bei den meisten Streuobstwiesen vs. professionellen Obstanbauplantagen um BK herum angeschaut. Es gibt ja diverse Möglichkeiten des Taggings. Mein Vorschlag ist, die Profi-Plantagen z.B. beim Ungeheuerhof oder Strümpfelbach mit landuse=orchard + produce=apple
zu taggen und die Streuobstwiesen als landuse=meadow + meadow=meadow_orchard + surface=grass + trees=apple_trees. 
So hätten wir die beiden Erscheinungsformen gut unterschieden. Was meinst Du dazu?
eggie (2020-09-02 16:29:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Lijkt mij oke zo.. 

MVG,
Eggie
skyper (2020-09-03 11:34:30+00:00): Hi

Where is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?

Where is the #hashtag of the task?

Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?

How about access tags or at least a fixme?

Who did instruct you?
Reviewer?

Cheers skyper
rababdul (2020-09-03 12:36:23+00:00): Hi Skyper,
Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. I have not added any access tags as there are as no resources supporting it. As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935, our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. 
Always happy to learn from the community.
skyper (2020-09-03 12:56:52+00:00): So the #hashtag is one of several issues regarding:

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

All of you stop editing until all issues are solved and tell your fellows and read the wiki mean-time.

Just take a look at your wiki page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics#Editing_Process

> "They make an edit only if there is ground data available and all edits are reviewed by a second level reviewer. They also have a team of GIS experts who audit a random sample of reviewed cases to ensure high standards of edits contributed to OSM."

But just ask your instructor. They should now.

It is not my part to tell you the guidelines.
skyper
rababdul (2020-09-04 15:42:10+00:00): Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
skyper (2020-09-05 09:48:30+00:00): Wann bekomme ich eine persönliche Antwort zu meine konkreten Fragen?

Bitte stelle richtig wer hier die Diskussion eingeleitet hat und dass darauf nur nach Einladung und viel zu spät reagiert wurde. Bitte in eigenen Worten formulieren!
rababdul (2020-09-15 16:18:29+00:00): Hi skyper,
thanks for the response, apologies for the delayed reply.  we are already working on updating hashtags in our edits, please give us some time to get back on it.we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community
eggie (2020-09-02 16:30:52+00:00): Dolf Lijkt me oke zo.. 
Gr eggie
ika-chan! (2020-09-02 15:58:02+00:00): CORRECTION: it appears that "railway=stop" is a valid (but rare in some places) tag referring to the stop position of trains, but I think it has fooled new editors (as well as me) to thinking that it represents a smaller stop. Ouch.

However, removing stop positions is not a good idea, because it is an accepted standard in public transport relations.
DD1GJ (2020-09-02 21:43:56+00:00): Gelöscht, Hotel bereits als Gebäude vorhanden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542791321/history

Hallo Softrunner, danke fürs Mitmachen, aber die von Dir verwendete App MAPS.ME ist nur eingeschränkt zum Editieren in OSM geeignet. Weitere Informationen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:49:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90312371
mueschel (2020-09-05 13:28:50+00:00): Please check this node, it got a strange tag and a strange housenumber
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868886478
theArchDruid (2020-09-08 13:30:24+00:00): Thanks for finding this. The error has been corrected.
*abq* (2020-09-20 15:13:14+00:00): Bitte für den Weg vom Roteck runter nicht Zastler direkt im name tag eintragen. Das ist kein Eigenname des Wegs sondern lediglich ein Wegweiser. Der übrigens von unten "Hinterwaldkopf direkt" lautet. OK?
Kovoschiz (2020-09-02 16:31:25+00:00): The Latin "cum" conjunction is what's used here. Common in HK.
VLD159 (2020-09-02 17:09:54+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz,

Thank you for letting me know about this 🙂 I will go ahead and revert my changes. 

Regards,
Anthony
VLD159 (2020-09-02 17:25:18+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz,

Here is the link for the reverted changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90316306

Thanks,
Anthony
houston_mapper1 (2020-09-07 12:25:38+00:00): please double check you edits before you submit. this edit marked 218 as a cartpath which i had to revert. You have also mapped all driveways within old sycamore plantation as cartpaths also and changed the residential roads to cart paths. please review these and tag them correctly
ovitters (2024-08-03 21:12:03+00:00): dit is een gigantisch late reactie maar ik zie het nu pas: Donau is voor een deel als "pedestrian" aangemerkt. Geen idee of dat in deze changeset is gedaan, maar geloof dat het toch niet klopt? lijkt een gewone krappe straat
eggie (2024-08-03 21:22:42+00:00): Hoi.. zal morgen even kijken..
Kom er op terug.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-08-04 05:52:47+00:00): Dag Ovitters,
Ik heb de pedestrian omgezet naar residential.
De oorspronkelijke changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90314547

Er was aanvankelijk nog geen straat ingetekend.

Bedankt voor je opmerkzaamheid.

MVG
eggie
Fra00 (2020-09-02 17:06:19+00:00): Le linee guida di OSM sono chiarissime: il simbolo del semaforo non rappresenta il semaforo fisico, ma l'incrocio in cui questo ha effetto. Gli incroci semplici, quindi senza intersezioni multiple, DEVONO avere un unico semaforo. Leggi le linee guida in inglese, che sono quelle vere di OSM. Per il resto, nessuno ha distrutto il tuo lavoro, se vuoi che la mappa sia sbagliata (perché così lo è) solo per una tua opinione personale, lasciala così. Dire "a mio avviso" fa capire che non hai capito il motivo della mia modifica: non è basata sul mio avviso, ma sulle linee guida.
damianeue (2020-09-02 17:18:53+00:00): So cosa dicono le linee guida di OSM. Ma visto che in alcuni casi è stato più preciso taggare i singoli semafori (visto che non tutte le strade contengono semafori), e comunque avendone parlato con editor più anziani sulla community italiana, ho preferito fare così in tutti i semafori della zona
Fra00 (2020-09-02 17:33:40+00:00): Io sinceramente sono sicuro che seguire le linee guida sia la cosa in assoluto più corretta. Poi ripeto, fai tu, non starò a fare una edit war.
sorcrosc (2020-09-02 18:53:54+00:00): Fra00, ti sbagli. Le linee guida dicono solo di mettere sempre i semafori su nodi appartenenti alle way e non di fianco isolati.
Mettere il semaforo solo sul nodo di intersezione è il metodo più approssimativo. Nessuno dice che è meglio, anzi direi che la maggior parte dei mappatori pensa il contrario.
Ciao
Fra00 (2020-09-02 19:10:02+00:00): Basta selezionare un nodo con semaforo, aprire la wiki di OSM in inglese e vedere la semplice linea guida. Non è una cosa che si deve interpretare: quando l'incrocio è semplice (quindi incontro di tutte le ways nello stesso nodo) il semaforo va messo nell’intersezione.
Fra00 (2020-09-02 19:17:59+00:00): Comunque sia chiaro che io non sto dicendo che sia migliore un metodo rispetto all'altro, anzi. Sto solamente dicendo che se ci sono delle linee guida si devono seguire, sennò ogni cosa lì scritta sarebbe inutile.
sorcrosc (2020-09-02 19:48:16+00:00): Io quello del singolo semaforo nel nodo di intersezione lo vedo come un metodo semplificato in un caso particolare.
L'altro metodo sempre valido è generico ma anche più dettagliato e penso che se un mappatore sceglie di usarlo bisogna rispettare la scelta.
Fra00 (2020-09-02 20:44:31+00:00): Il punto è che non dipende da come la vediamo noi, ma da come deve essere. C'è un elenco di casi è di soluzioni: il caso è quello di incrocio semplice, quindi la soluzione è un semaforo sul nodo di intersezione (ripeto che non lo dico io, ma le linee guida). Non c'è una scelta da compiere, ma istruzioni tecniche da seguire.
Fra00 (2020-09-09 11:12:57+00:00): Quindi @sorcrosc, ognuno fa come gli pare (ignorando le linee guida)? Questa libera scelta vale solo per i semafori (se sì, per quale motivo?) o per qualunque altra cosa?
sorcrosc (2020-09-09 20:51:30+00:00): La documentazione esiste come guida per i mappatori (e per gli utilizzatori dei dati) ma sono gli stessi mappatori che la scrivono in base anche a come le cose vengono mappate. Qui ci sono due modalità, entrambe valide e utilizzate. Può essere che oggi la maggior parte degli incroci a X sono mappati con il singolo semaforo e quindi la documentazione ne tiene conto ma non è detto che questo è il metodo "giusto" e non mi sembra che si affermi questo. Il metodo migliore alla fine è quello che permette il maggior livello di dettaglio ed in questo caso quello dei semafori multipli consente di inserire una informazione in più: la posizione dei punti di fermata dei semafori. Se imponi il singolo semaforo impedisci di inserire questa informazione a chi vorrebbe, qundi non puoi farlo. Però puoi proporre un altro metodo se questo per te ha problemi o sai come migliorarlo.
Io la vedo così.

Ciao

P.S. Se non l'hai già letto forse troverai interessante questo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
Fra00 (2020-09-09 22:50:59+00:00): Io non voglio aprire nessuna discussione di proposta, ma ciò che dici è completamente opposto rispetto alle linee guida, le quali non indicano più modi di taggare semafori di questo tipo, ma solo uno.
Comunque, dato che a quanto pare la documentazione è solo una guida, mi comporterò di conseguenza nella mia attività di mappatura, derogando quando riterrò che sarà meglio per la mappa stessa.
Buon proseguimento.
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:15:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
andrewwiseman (2021-08-27 17:22:11+00:00): When mapping buildings please press the q on your keyboard to make the corners 90 degrees. Buildings are usually rectangles or squares. Thanks.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:36:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90315644
user_2066394 (2020-09-02 19:53:37+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
estutz8 (2020-09-03 07:07:02+00:00): Super! Danke für den Hinweis!
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:58:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90315974
user_2066394 (2020-09-02 21:07:29+00:00): Macht landuse=farmyard da Sinn? An den Stellen sind ja tatsächlich Gebäude.
Ronson1909 (2020-09-02 22:44:38+00:00): farmyard sind "landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe im Außenbereich von Ortschaften", also auch Gebäude. Gibt es ein Spezielles, welches Du anders einordnen würdest als ich und wenn ja als was?
user_2066394 (2020-09-02 23:04:21+00:00): "Es gehört immer die Betriebsfläche bis an die Grundstücksgrenzen dazu, also inklusive Wohnhäuser, Stallungen, Gerätehallen usw."
Ronson1909 (2020-09-03 08:33:02+00:00): Ok, mein Fehler, ich war mir nicht bewusst, dass das ein Flächentag und kein Gebäudetag ist. Ich hab's erst Mal mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90347895 rückgängig gemacht
Frans S (2020-09-30 10:49:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please be more precise in following the outlines of a building and square each rectangular building with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-09-03 04:36:45+00:00): Hello! Please have o look on http://www.osm.org/way/843583520: What did you mean with the key "(new tag)"?
eggie (2020-09-02 18:06:30+00:00): Die doorwaadbare plaats was een bijdrage van 	CJTmmr  Je zou natuurlijk kunnen vragen wat zijn bron is.
Changeset is van 	2020-08-03 17:07
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90317091

Je hebt verder de waterway=canal verwijderd. Vaak wordt in het vlak natural=water nog een waterway=....  ingetekend. Dat draagt dan de naam van het water of is van belang voor routering.  

Je changeset is zo groot geworden omdat je iets hebt veranderd aan de landuse=residential van Nieuwerkerk.

Mapse,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 18:09:01+00:00): Je hebt het correct aangepast..