piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-07-24 06:39:57+00:00): Dag Leo,
Op het vlak zal de naam in ieder geval renderen. Op een adresnode zonder verdere tags niet. 
Bedrijfsnamen doen dat ook niet zonder ofiice of shop tags.
Wanneer de erf-namen nog in gebruik zijn lijkt het me correct.
Wellicht heb je nog wat aan deze wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic

Verder kennen we place nodes van gehucht t/m grote stad.
place=locality pm een naam van een gebied aan te duiden.
place=isolated_dwelling voor een afgelezen huis met toch een naamaanduiding. 

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling
Zomaar wat tips. Maar als dit de namen zijn dit nog in zwang zijn kan het inderdaad op de farmyard.
Zal eens naar je links kijken. 
Namen die net meer in zwang zijn kunnen als old_name =  wordn toegevoegd. Dan staan ze toch in de data.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
(Die naam rendert dan weer niet)
MVG,
Eggie
Pete Owens (2020-07-26 20:08:42+00:00): No it doesn't.

That is a DIRECTION sign. The sign for a shared use footway is a circular blue sign with an image of a cycle and a pedestrian: Either one above the other for unsegregated shared use or side by side for segregated. Please familiarise yourself with the highway code before making any further changes to the map.
Pete Owens (2020-07-26 20:44:09+00:00): Further note: I have long been aware of the absence of the dropped kerb to access Black Bear park from Kingsway:
https://www.cyclestreets.net/location/84818/
But that does not make pavement cycling legal.
TomJeffs (2020-07-27 14:30:05+00:00): Jesus Christ, have a listen to yourself "please familiarise yourself with the highway code".

Seriously can't be arsed arguing about it.  Councils fuck things up all the time with misplaced signage.  Go and bore someone else.
Pete Owens (2020-07-27 16:06:43+00:00): You are the one making an argument - I just pointed out that the cycle track you had mapped did not exist. And corrected the map - I live here after all. You could have simply let it be (or perhaps apologised for the mistake), but you continued not only to post multiple times arguing the toss, but editing the map again to put the non-existent path back.

You may well think it ought to be a cycle track - and actually I would be in agreement with you and long ago asked the council to do this. But the map has to relflect the world as it is - not how you would like it to be.
Cascafico (2020-07-24 07:49:26+00:00): Hai verificato di persona il cantiere?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88422908
user_6631989 (2020-07-24 11:50:32+00:00): Certamente
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-25 16:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88500502 where the changeset comment is: Reverting sock-puppet of spigo_de_ajo reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3808. Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88495808 ..
vramirez122000 (2021-09-14 01:26:23+00:00): Muy graciosito. Este mapa es utilizado por todo el mundo, favor de abstenerte de añadir bromitas
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:45:36+00:00): Perdon.
uq16 (2020-07-23 20:01:14+00:00): Source for unit numbering and business names is from visual survey
PT-53 (2021-01-25 07:27:53+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60557125/history
hat keine Merkmale mehr.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-02-14 10:24:59+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe, 
nachdem Du bisher leider nicht reagiert hast, habe ich die Fläche heute gelöscht.
eggie (2020-07-24 20:05:24+00:00): Review: Je hebt van de aansluiting Groenendaal highway=unclassified een fietspad gemaakt.
De Groenendaal loopt dus nu dood op het fietspad? Klopt dat wel?
Kun je niet meer met "de auto" hier de Diessenseweg opdraaien en is de oversteek vervangen door een fietspad?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88423658
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-24 20:11:39+00:00): Hoe komen auto's bij de gebouwen?  Ergens klopt hier iets niet.
eggie (2020-07-24 20:24:45+00:00): reverted by changeset  #88476047
Beste gnunen, 
Je aanpassingen heb ik teruggedraaid omdat het onmogelijk goed kan zijn. 
Wat was dan het probleem hier? Je kunt als fietser toch gewoon oversteken?
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-28 21:26:08+00:00): PB contact.  De situatie heb ik inmiddels aangepast. Het parallelfietspad langs de N269 komt nu uit precies bij de oversteek.
Het routeringsprobleem is opgelost. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-28 21:27:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=51.48477%2C5.15016%3B51.48361%2C5.15338#map=18/51.48419/5.15177
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-16 00:04:12+00:00): Chwila, to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4325152291/history działa czy też nie?
Miroslav Suchý (2020-11-15 16:08:20+00:00): Ahoj. při mapování el. dobíječek nemapujem každý jednotlivý stojan (stejně jako u benzinek), ale popisujeme to kapacitou a počtem zásuvek. Podobně operátor nenín "ČEZ (CCS/CHAdeMO/Mennekes type2)" ale jenom "ČEZ".
Opravím to.
Dako (2020-11-15 21:09:07+00:00): neopraval bych to,
nabíjecí stojany nejsou čerpací stanice, je dobré, na první pohled, vědět že v daném místě je jeden, dva nebo tři stojany, a tím předvídat, pravděpodobnost obsazení. Stejně jako, na první pohled, vědět, že se jedná o rychlonabíjení CCS/CHAdeMO nebo jen o pouhý AC/MENNEKES stojan, jejichž má ČEZ jestě stále mnoho.
Frans S (2020-07-24 11:57:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A short remark. 
When mapping buildings , partly hidden by trees. extrapolate the roofline and do not follow the treeline. 
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-24 10:41:45+00:00): Hello. Sorry to say but your mapping quality is below the standards HOTOSM stands for
See my PM to you
Please improve your mapping skills
Frans S (2020-07-24 16:36:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. I reviewed this changeset as per your request.
In general your mappings are fair, but need in occasions with complex buildings, more attention. Map as accurate including extensions and other changes. You let highways run through a building and you overlapped some buildings. Please be more accurate. always square a building with the Q key
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88424464
stevea (2020-07-24 05:11:33+00:00): Please stop this madness!  Adding natural=grassland like relation/11341032 is ridiculous!
James214 (2021-08-26 16:30:43+00:00): Why was the boundary removed?  Hicksville should have a boundary like all the other towns around it.
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-26 16:46:06+00:00): Well it's been a year, but most likely this was one that was so badly mangled that it wasn't worth preserving.  I fixed as many as I could where the geometries were sufficiently preserved.

Hicksville is technically a CDP and the town is Oyster Bay from my understanding.  This and other CDPs on Long Island were imported from I believe TIGER 2008 and tagged as an administrative boundary, rather than the consensus boundary=census for a CDP.  Also, since the CDPs actually change over time at the whims of the census bureau (including considerable changes in the last decade), these need to get re-built from the latest TIGER and stitched into the adjacent boundaries.  It's something I've been meaning to work on but I've been distracted by other projects and nobody else (until now!) has noticed the condition of the CDPs in this area.  If you're up for boundary work (it's kind of tricky if you're not used to sparse editing in JOSM) I'd be happy to work with you on Slack to help you get started, otherwise -- thanks for prompting me to revisit Long Island boundaries :)
James214 (2021-08-26 18:17:56+00:00): Hi,
Thank you so much for getting back to me and the explanation.    

I use a site named CityStrides for keeping track of what streets I run on in various places.  On Saturday, I did my first run that included Hicksville and that is when I discovered the issue with the boundary.  

I also put a question on the OSM forum about it and someone responded and added a boundary for Hicksville that looks accurate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10805170#map=14/40.7719/-73.5134

My own OSM skills are the most basic and I only go in to delete streets that no longer exist after I look at my runs in CityStrides.

Did you once live on Long Island?

Mark
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-26 18:24:14+00:00): Cool, that boundary looks pretty good offhand from casual inspection.  I did just fix the boundary to tag it as a CDP.  I operate a site with similar functionality called StreetFerret and I'm constantly fixing broken boundaries as a result.  I'm actually up in RI but I end up doing boundary edits in a lot of places because of this project.  Happy running!
Frans S (2020-07-24 09:40:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-10-25 19:53:57+00:00): De cînd oare o școală muzicala îi o ”Școală de Arte Plastice”?
camelCaseNick (2020-08-03 02:07:42+00:00): Hey,
what do you by artist:wikidata=Gr? Is artist:wikidata=Q52047072 the correct one here?
CamelCaseNick
gscholz (2020-07-25 06:12:15+00:00): Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-63.67213&lat=45.06426&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

I wonder how this could happen as you are using JOSM which complains about such errors before uploading.

Kind Regards
Guido
datendelphin (2020-07-26 10:15:02+00:00): Hallo giannibisto und willkommen bei OSM. Bitte nicht Ladennamen in vier Sprachen eintragen. Die Namensvarianten sind nur für Objekte gedacht, welche wirklich einen spezifischen Namen in anderen Sprachen haben, wie eine Stadt oder ein See. Du hast heir einfach Optiker in einige sprachen übersetzt, aber dass das ein Optiker ist, ist ja bereits mit dem shop tag gesagt. Also einfach im name tag den namen so eintragen, wie am Laden angeschrieben, fertig. Grüsse Michael
user_8334278 (2020-07-23 22:02:16+00:00): if you want to map you have to go there even if it takes 2 + hours by bes.
Frans S (2020-07-25 09:48:39+00:00): Hello Mike
Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings are below the quality HOTOSM stands for>
Inaccurate and not squared. 
Also you did not map all buildings on this task. I invalidate this task so that you can correct the mappings and add missing buildings 
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-24 10:19:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Just tag a building as building=yes
No name !  
Best regards
eggie (2020-07-24 07:00:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
literan (2020-07-24 16:32:46+00:00): для насосной станции, по идее, лучше подойдет тег pipeline=substation

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11341286/history
user_6446486 (2020-07-24 18:50:19+00:00): там не просто насосная станция, а с водозабором тут же:
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCQlzITgXA
literan (2020-07-24 21:25:53+00:00): хм... нашли где воду брать
user_6446486 (2020-07-24 21:55:53+00:00): так это же промышленный водопровод, там не для питья) согласно оф. документам, есть ещё Черкизовская и Крымская, но их пока не искал
literan (2020-07-25 08:44:32+00:00): да, действительно...интересно, куда эта вода поступает, промзон поблизости нет. Гребной канал подпитывает?)
AnonymousAlligator (2020-08-22 22:10:34+00:00): Hi, you marked the parking garage here as bicycle parking. Is this a mistake?
Minh Nguyen (2020-08-23 00:56:58+00:00): Yes, that was by mistake. I’m using the Vietnamese localization of iD, which for some reason is showing bicycle parking ahead of car parking when searching for parking.
Minh Nguyen (2020-08-23 01:04:14+00:00): Fixed in changeset 89795914.
Sparks (2022-04-20 19:42:06+00:00): Where did this track come from?  I don't see anything here on satellite imagery.  Is this a snow trail, maybe?
Something B (2020-07-23 23:39:40+00:00): Ottawa, of course.
literan (2020-07-24 16:28:19+00:00): не надо рисовать вымышленные велодорожки
nicolaymitropolsky (2021-07-19 18:04:51+00:00): Здравствуйте!  Ну какая https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428854832/history#map=17/55.98949/36.83588 же это `highway = cycleway` - это обычный `highway = track` как и всё вокруг.
nicolaymitropolsky (2021-07-19 18:06:32+00:00): И почему `smoothness = impassable` вполне себе passable, для машины может узковато, а для квадрика - вполне
literan (2020-07-24 16:25:02+00:00): как так вдруг тропы в велодорожки превратились?
Djminisite (2020-09-09 07:51:03+00:00): Hey, is there a reason Church Point Holiday Park is in the middle a housing estate several miles down the coast from where it should be?
bhietsch (2020-07-24 00:45:50+00:00): Part 4, not part 43 lol
staylor42 (2020-07-24 22:12:12+00:00): *houses
asianrider (2022-03-07 19:04:37+00:00): What the hell is that ? clearly not the Nome-Taylor hwy.
Can we get rid of this bug ?
wireguy (2020-07-24 13:02:47+00:00): Dylan, I think you accidentally merged Toms River with a crosswalk.   Can you correct this?   Also, your bounding box of edits is over a large area.  Better to make two (or multiple) changesets, one for each smaller area.
wireguy (2020-07-24 13:08:38+00:00): it looks like you also merged a tree and a hydrant.   Probably want to add a separate node.
wireguy (2020-07-24 13:14:43+00:00): Quick tip,  press the 'Q' key when you have a building selected, and it will square up it's corners.   Makes things much nicer.   Keep up the mapping!
Frans S (2020-07-24 09:28:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Non of your mappings are accurate enough to comply to the quality standards of HOTOSM
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
user_5359 (2021-04-24 07:11:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What ist the meaning of the tag key=12345?
geoaria (2021-04-27 18:05:10+00:00): حتما وقتی مادی ها را می کشید بایستی در هنگام عبور از روی مسیر سواره یا پیاده رو از پل استفاده کنید . حتما مسیر ها و مادی را روی تصویر منطبق کنید در اینجا بارها مادی از روی کوچه ها عبور کرده و از پل استفاده نشده و در بقیه موارد هم از روی مسیر های دیگربدون دقت ترسیم شده است. بسیار ناشیانه
bbmiller (2020-07-24 11:39:32+00:00): I like it! Nice work.
Frans S (2020-07-24 15:37:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
I reviewed them and there are mappings which have to be improved. Please map more accurate by following the outlines and extensions. square each building with the Q key 
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88431285
DressyPear4 (2020-07-24 21:42:37+00:00): Olá, não substitua as vias residenciais por calçadas, apenas adicione "foot=yes".
Fiz as correções
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88431383
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 10:45:12+00:00): Hello,
Would it be possible to use more meaningful changeset comments rather than simply "edits"?  It'd make it much easier for other people to see what has changed.
Best Regards,
Andy
ftrebien (2020-08-17 20:44:27+00:00): A PB-041 e a PB-073 são troncais conforme o consenso do grupo OSM Nordeste segundo a proposta que foi aprovada por consenso nacional (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil). Qual o motivo para o rebaixamento delas?
DUGA (2022-07-21 04:31:59+00:00): Many buildings imported here do not even exist.
Otenkiya (2021-01-30 14:07:59+00:00): 国道23号 (164688319、第6版)の編集により、国道23号 (8549439、第52版)に断絶が発生。後日修正済み。
karson_ (2021-07-03 15:59:37+00:00): Was this an import? Some of the buildings were absolutely horrible quality. For instance, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829508324 as well as the larger buildings nearby.
mariotomo (2022-06-14 16:57:58+00:00): most of this users additions look as imports. according to Pascal Neis' web site, in 18 Mapping days RobertReynolds contributed 61 changesets, totalling 254,847
Map changes, for an average above 4 thousand changes per changeset.

it does not impact me, I just noticed this user in the Nicaragua statistics.
Rohit Dhanna (2020-07-25 04:08:50+00:00): 88433500
Kovoschiz (2020-07-24 14:17:41+00:00): `access=no` on a `route=ferry` would mean no one can use it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88433528
escallic (2020-07-24 08:26:54+00:00): What do you think: Marsh trail should have `bicycle=yes` or `bicycle=designated`[?](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=designated?uselang=en)
Herman Lee (2020-07-24 07:47:09+00:00): 刚完善了关系里的成员就被您给退了。。。
ma-rt-in (2020-07-27 08:44:46+00:00): Hallo,
wie heißt den der Kleingartenkolonie hier genau?
Frans S (2020-07-24 09:39:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S (2020-07-24 12:41:07+00:00): Hello
See my PM to you. Your mappings are below the quality level HOTOSM expect
Please correct your mappings and square each building with the Q key
BlueG (2020-12-20 14:10:36+00:00): Hallo stadt-lev-lev2,
bei deinen Anpassungen der surface-Werte Ende Juli/Anfang August ist leider des öfteren etwas schief gegangen. Dieses Changeset hier ist leider nur eines von vielen, in denen der surface-Wert zu "paving_stones,_asphalt" o.ä. verändert wurde. Dieser Wert ist nicht gebräuchlich und somit kann ein Datennutzer nichts mit der Information anfangen.
Bitte achte in Zukunft genauer auf die Werte. Ein einzelner Tippfehler passiert jedem einmal, aber wenn dieser Tippfehler per Copy&Paste auf das gesamte Stadtgebiet verteilt wird, ist das sehr ärgerlich. Zumal die bearbeiteten Wege vorher aus meiner Sicht in den meisten Fällen schon einen korrekten surface-Wert hatten.
Außerdem wäre es schön, wenn du in Zukunft deine Änderungen in etwas größeren Changesets zusammenfasst. Wenn dann mal etwas schief geht, lässt sich das wenigstens nachvollziehen und "gerade biegen" ;-)
Viele Grüße!
BlueG
keithonearth (2020-07-24 05:40:27+00:00): link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87866102
AndyB_66 (2020-07-24 07:45:51+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki - użytkownik (może raczej użyszkodnik) "rifoxedek" po raz kolejny mąci w tym miejscu. Zgłosiłem go jako wandala - może gdy więcej osób to zrobi, to ktoś z modów go ustawi do pionu.
Nakaner (2020-07-24 07:11:57+00:00): Hallo,

dieser Änderungssatz hat eine sehr große Bounding Box (umschreibendes Rechteck), weil du sowohl Dinge in Hamburg und Freiburg im Breisgau geändert hast. Könntest du bitte in solchen Fällen künftig die Sachen in getrennten Änderungssätzen hochladen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88437004
Kohlschu (2020-07-24 07:31:37+00:00): Lieber Michael,
gut, danke für den Hinweis.
Beste Grüße aus Freiburg,
Johannes (Kohlschu)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88437004
ejjoshy (2020-07-24 06:13:24+00:00): Apologies for using internal terminology on OSM, the correct comment for the changeset is Added service road and driveway
shu0410 (2024-04-19 14:49:01+00:00): Hi katpatuka, I'm an editor from China and I see that you've added a large number of Chinese towns, but there are problems with the addition of certain roads, mainly in the form of location deviations. I am not sure of the reason for this, but I can help you to fix these roads. May I ask if these deviations are normal?
katpatuka (2024-04-20 05:40:31+00:00): Hello Shu,

Can you give a way id as an example? Imagery may have changed since and imagery offset may have changed too.

Around zh:向阳镇 (天峨县) bing imagery is older than mapbox imagery for example...
ortho_is_hot (2020-07-24 08:56:56+00:00): Funnily enough, I've been meaning to remove that for a while. I'll go ahead add shoulder=no and cycleway=no to some of the missing sections so that routers get a better idea of the situation
Frans S (2020-07-25 10:27:35+00:00): Hi, See these pictures about your mappings. Rather sloppy.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mM2tUye80SaHq_sfCRnPuBNkvy6lrgnw/view?usp=sharing
I invalidate this task, Please correct it
Best regards and keep mapping
DressyPear4 (2020-07-24 21:11:39+00:00): Olá, você usou a camada do bing para alinhamento, mas essa está desatualizada.
Reverti essa edição.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88438778