piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kortgodt (2022-03-05 16:00:31+00:00): Ok så lad os tage mit eget selvsyn på lokationen som reference det er måske også no go? Nu var det mest for at lade dig se det med mine øjne nu du ikke har mulighed for at være på lokationen.
osmviborg (2022-03-05 16:36:04+00:00): Har du set på skråfoto?
kortgodt (2022-03-05 16:40:19+00:00): Ja. Har du været på lokationen?
eggie (2022-03-05 13:33:15+00:00): Tag klippenhuhn...  Was meinen Sie mit Neugründung

Nur description=description		Kopplung Club Enkhuizen  klappt nicht in OSM.
amenity=??? 
office=??
shop=?
Gibt es hier ein Unternehmen mit einer Besuchadresse? 

Grüss,
eggie
Leo Slager (2022-03-05 21:38:06+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Gelet op de historie van de mapper is dit niet serieus te nemen.
Stel voor dit te reverten.
FraukeLeo (2022-04-17 08:57:27+00:00): Hallo Bierphysik, surface=compacted und tracktype=grade1 schließen sich aber aus. grade1 ist Beton, Steinpflaster oder Asphalt. Ich nehme mal an, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102870104 ist asphaltiert (bin ihn gestern nicht abgelaufen, nur gekreuzt).
Bierphysik (2022-04-20 07:17:06+00:00): Da hat Streetcomplete wohl etwas verzwirbelt
kortgodt (2022-03-05 14:13:57+00:00): En noget lavstammet skov der tager sig mere ud som et buskads, kvaliteten falder.
osmviborg (2022-03-05 15:35:02+00:00): Prøv med skråfoto, mere skov end scrub.
kortgodt (2022-03-05 15:58:24+00:00): Ud over skråfoto mit eget selv syn på lokationen er jeg ikke imponeret er jeg ikke imponeret over din beskrivelse af området.
b-holdet (2022-03-05 19:42:49+00:00): Jeg var forbi i dag og hvis man ser på det som orienteringskortnormen, så er det en tæthed 2. Det er det man kalder mellemsvært gennemløbelig.
Det er ikke lige det man kalder "skov" i OSM, men er over i scrub:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub

Så jeg ville tegne det som scrub.

Ellers dejligt at du endelig svarer på kritik og spørgsmål.
kortgodt (2022-03-05 19:48:21+00:00): Sig det. til OSM viborg
Tjuro (2022-03-07 10:29:31+00:00): Hoi Valenoern,

I see that you added some greenery. its looking quite nice, however natural=shrubbery is not meant to be used on points, only on area's.
Could you change the points to natural=scrub or make area's of natural=shrubbery?

Regards,
Tjuro
Dimitar155 (2022-03-08 16:55:41+00:00): Здравей Ивайло,

Може ли да промениш имената на двата маршрута, по същия начин по който са направени за трамвай 7 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19782). Благодаря предварително.

Поздрави,
Митко
Ивайло (2022-03-08 17:45:04+00:00): Няма проблем, въпреки че наистина е противоречиво, както е отбелязано във Вики-то. Затова и го пропуснах на първо четене, старая се да избягвам дублирането на информация.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-08 17:51:42+00:00): По принцип редакторите трябва сами да "сглобяват" тази информация, но не го правят (или поне iD не го прави).
user_5359 (2022-03-15 10:56:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/way/1037334159 (one some example). Which value of landuse did you mean?
AntMadeira (2022-03-06 20:03:51+00:00): Ora viva.
Só para chamar a atenção de que os nomes devem ser escritos sem abreviações, por extenso.

Continuação do excelente trabalho que tens feito nesta região!

Abraço,
António.
meioserrano (2022-03-07 17:58:35+00:00): Obrigado, vou corrigir.
Parece q ue vou andar muito por esta zona ainda.. muita coisa por desbravar..  )))
AntMadeira (2022-03-07 20:50:31+00:00): Neste mapa, nunca falta trabalho. E ainda bem. :D
fabiotofy (2022-03-05 13:26:57+00:00): prendo atto di questo grosso lavoro di revisione delle nomenclature delle vie, ma rimango contrario :) Un saluto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118125729
sorcrosc (2022-03-06 03:02:26+00:00): Posso chiedere perché hai eliminato i nomi dalle strade, tante delle quali sono residential, che normalmente hanno un nome?
alessandrocarmeli (2022-03-06 10:18:39+00:00): ho guardato larghezze e disposizione dei civici e le ho anche modificate alcune...
user_5359 (2022-03-07 10:39:27+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the tag carparking=no? Did you mean operator instead off operator_name? Also the tag operational_status = operational is more a tag of HOT not for amenity / leisure / etc.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-05 13:12:19+00:00): I did suggest that the person who complained to the DWG that it would be good if they tried to contact this mapper, but they didn't.
Notwithstanding that, the data looks pretty unlikely, so I'll remove it.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-05 13:12:40+00:00): J'ai suggéré à la personne qui s'est plainte au DWG qu'il serait bon qu'elle essaie de contacter ce mappeur, mais elle ne l'a pas fait.
Malgré cela, les données semblent assez improbables, je vais donc les supprimer.
eteb3 (2026-07-21 13:28:47+00:00): Hi ianc,

Just messaging to draw your attention to two notes, which claim a path you edited is "not a footpath" - presumably meaning, "not a public right of way".

I see you added the designation after Andy Mackay marked it "permissive". 

Are you confident that's accurate, and the anonymous note-poster is wrong? Or could it be that it's better to revert to "permissive"?

Cheers,

eteb3

notes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note=5408801
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note=5408805
JeroenHoek (2022-03-05 17:33:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31971333/history

Sicherlich kein Asphalt.
gscscnd (2022-03-05 14:06:06+00:00): Dzięki!
B_KSL (2022-03-06 07:32:04+00:00): Nie ma za co. Z przyjemnością takie usuwam. I współczuję, że Ci się w okolicy kolejny jejko pojawił. Ten też nie reaguje na prośby
gscscnd (2022-03-06 15:17:20+00:00): Do poprzedniego napisałem dłuższą wiadomość po wycofaniu paru sporych zestawów zmian, nawet się odezwał. Na drugi dzień założył nowe konto.
Jest lepiej, część moich ówczesnych uwag uwzględnił, ale chyba nic nowego (tj. odkąd ma nowe konto) do niego nie dociera.
Shipu Innu (2022-03-06 14:19:37+00:00): Bonjour Martin,

please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Good_changeset_comments . Whatever you edit you always use 100 % generic comments like "mise a jour divers" or "update" which is an insult to other mappers in case of recurrence.
Martin868 (2022-03-06 16:18:28+00:00): You found anything wrong with the edits ?
Shipu Innu (2022-03-11 16:35:07+00:00): No, but the changeset comment shall say what exactly you've updated or added.
Lee Carré (2022-03-05 16:21:39+00:00): ▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
▪︎much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_5359 (2022-03-06 07:21:22+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of these tag combination
disused	yes (?)
landuse	greenfield
name	Morlais Brook
opening_times	no (we use opening_hours)
other	Unknown (other of what)
wheelchair	no
Have the trees there been felled?
Awania Morish (2022-03-06 17:41:44+00:00): This is Survey data from local community, where Mel has surveyed under those trees carefully and we shall tide up for unknown tags . thanks
vasony (2022-04-19 15:50:50+00:00): T. Szerkesztő!

A Kádárta teleépülésrész, így az addr:suburb mezőbe való, nem az addr:city-be.

Tamás
wertol (2022-04-21 09:52:31+00:00): Köszönöm a javítást!
MarcoR (2022-03-26 22:05:58+00:00): Hi!
in OpenStreetMap, public WCs are mapped with amenity=toilets¹; I have already fixed your object; please let me know if I misunderstood and you wanted to map another feature.

¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=toilets

Kind regards,
Marco.
japuifor (2022-03-29 14:37:04+00:00): thanks, 
is it possible to say that's closed in winter season?
MarcoR (2022-03-30 21:36:38+00:00): You can use the opening_hours¹ key. I don't know how to specify a season but you can easily write any date range.

¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
surveyor54 (2022-03-05 16:49:46+00:00): Hi,
geht der Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124560421
jetzt durch den Wall?
Früher ging er durch die Lücke.

Gruß
surveyor54
TomRat (2022-03-05 19:13:08+00:00): Hallo, 
habe das nun sofort korrigiert. Aber eine wirklich vollständig richtige Version wird es wohl erst geben, wenn ich dort vor Ort ein paar zusätzliche GPS-Tracks aufnehmen konnte. Momentan sehe ich dort halt nur einen einzigen raus gehen, eben den direkt durch den Wall.  :-(
surveyor54 (2022-03-05 22:41:57+00:00): Ich meinte den vorderen Bereich, wo es in den Ringwall hinein geht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2292540281
TomRat (2022-03-08 15:28:17+00:00): Hatte den südlichen Teil des Ringwalls gemäß dem Foto korrigiert, diesen Durchgang nach SO dabei aber wohl unverändert gelassen. Ist nun alles gemäß Foto und wird (irgendwann) dann auch vor Ort noch einmal verifziert.
surveyor54 (2022-03-09 07:16:58+00:00): Ok, danke 👍

Weiterhin frohes Mappen und Gruß
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-06 11:31:22+00:00): Ciao. Mi sfugge perché hai cancellato name:it e name:de. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118128125
user_10901495 (2022-03-06 15:50:45+00:00): Creano problemi con il tag default_language dei paesi in Osmose e sono inutili.
Nessun data consumer o persona ha bisogno della traduzione di questa cosa: Flixbus 476: Koblenz, Hbf. => Milan, Lampugnano in italiano o in tedesco (se si tratta di mettere il nome cinese quello può essere utile oltre a non creare intoppi con Osmose in quanto nessuno dei paesi interessati ha il cinese come lingua ufficiale)
IlBano (2022-03-06 18:33:06+00:00): Osmose ha il suo modo di "interpretare" i dati, ma questo non vuol dire che si debba adattarli per ottenere un risultato che sia soddisfacente per i suoi algoritimi.
Nello specifico è ovvio che un percorso internazionale non possa avere un name che corrisponde al default_language di tutte le nazioni attraversate e qui, siccome Osmose non ci arriva, si può sempre ignorare la issue o classificarla come falso positivo.
Mentre sono d'accordo nell'impostare un name in inglese, trovo che rimuovere i tag name:* perchè considerati inutili sia molto opinabile. Perchè non dovrei poter leggere Coblenza invece di Koblenz in un applicativo in grado di interpretare name:it ? Questa facoltà va garantita a chiunque usi i dati OSM, a prescindere da quale alfabeto o sistema di ideogrammi usino.
Mordechai23 (2022-03-05 15:07:30+00:00): co zmieniłeś w tej edycji? Dodawanie komentarzy do zestawów zmian to obowiązek edytora

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
user_5359 (2022-03-07 16:51:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/929019091, http://www.osm.org/way/929019090. What is the meaning of the tag derelict_type=public? By the way this information must be tags of the relation and not of the relation members.
CjMalone (2022-03-22 11:37:12+00:00): Cleaned up in #118774953
rab (2022-04-02 13:08:30+00:00): needs more work!
alignment, two roundabouts, surface, removal of incorrect data, updating of the route relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/301631
ianlopez1115 (2022-03-05 14:46:59+00:00): *[Iligan, Lanao del Norte]
takhadnotor (2022-03-11 11:14:27+00:00): Du wünscht dir eine Überprüfung deines Changesets. Ich habe ihn mir angeschaut, und es schaut okay aus. Mit eigenen Ortskenntnissen weiß ich, dass es da auch eine kleine Hütte zum Verschenken von Dingen gibt. Hast du überprüft, ob die Hütte tatsächlich "Give Box" heißt? Ansonsten würde ich den Tag:name rausnehmen.
user_5359 (2022-03-07 17:14:18+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1037352630. What ist the meaning of the tag record_type = steep_incline ?
CjMalone (2022-03-06 21:10:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9556168334

Shouldn't have made it to OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9556168333

record_type shouldn't be in OSM.
mueschel (2022-03-21 13:28:11+00:00): Hi,
this node also has many tags that are not used in other places and don't seem to be suited for OSM as they are:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9556168331
disability_access 
lit_operational
public_transport_type 	
timetable_available
transport_hub_name 	
transport_operational

Please check and fix this.
CjMalone (2022-03-22 11:49:07+00:00): I've should have cleaned up this changeset in #118775388
user_5359 (2022-03-07 14:10:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9556174107. What is the meaning of the tag Friendship = Park?
user_5359 (2022-03-12 07:27:57+00:00): I move the unknown tag to note.
Silur (2022-04-05 21:13:15+00:00): Moin wsoroe,

Du hast die construction=tertiary tags mit einem wenig aussagenden Kommentar gelöscht. Warum?
Bloß weil das nicht die überwiegende Verwendung ist, war das Tag nicht falsch - die Buchtstraße hat für die Zeit der ebenfalls nicht gewöhnlichen Baustelle eine secondary-Funktion übernommen und soll diese danach wieder verlieren. Was spricht dagegen, das solange zu annotieren?
Gruß, Silur
abakus_uploader (2022-03-05 23:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-03-06 06:48:54+00:00): Hello! You add the key admin_level=1 to the boundary. But admin_level=2 means a country, so admin_level=1 is wrong for this boundary. Please correct your entry.
ivanbranco (2022-03-06 09:20:14+00:00): Hi Stephen,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037359808/history

the correct tag for farmlands is "landuse=farmland", not "place=farm land"
ivanbranco (2022-03-06 09:22:15+00:00): Also you changed this waterway=river to a waterway=Bing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219747450/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
catdreamer (2022-05-09 13:54:11+00:00): 就等高線看火燒寮這個peak標示也真的太古怪了
letihu (2022-03-15 20:59:02+00:00): Hallo,
hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037367305/history
fehlen wohl noch tags.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-10 01:23:08+00:00): Please map buildings individually
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118131935
Glassman (2022-03-05 23:05:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

We don't tag temporary objects in OSM - such as where police might be waiting. I removed the nodes. I'll send you info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118132296
wkdgs (2022-03-15 09:23:10+00:00): Laut den Tags hat sich dort früher mal eine Bahnnstrecke befunden. Es gibt einige, die sowas gerne zu OSM hinzufügen, obwohl es nicht mehr existiert. Meiner Meinung nach ist es richtig das zu löschen.

Gibt es noch Stellen, an denen man erkennen kann, dass sich dort mal eine Bahnstrecke befunden hat?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118132515
deex (2022-03-16 04:18:25+00:00): Ich hab erstmal nur den Teil gelöscht, wo definitiv nichts mehr von irgendeiner Bahnstrecke zu sehen ist. Den Rest bin ich noch nicht abgelaufen.
Ich würde das nur drin lassen, wenn tatsächlich noch alte Gleise zu sehen sind.
WoSoe (2022-03-06 05:33:10+00:00): Hallo Donnerstagswanderer,

noch einmal zur Info.

Landnutzungsflächen werden nicht gestappelt und sollten sich auch nicht überschneiden!

Flurnamen könnte man mit place=locality kennzeichnen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality

Gruß
WoSoe
lololailo (2022-03-06 19:46:01+00:00): hola, seguramente no te interesa saber como se edita una rambla pero aqui te dejo un enlace
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:waterway%3Dstream
Si ademas la rambla tiene arrastres de piedras le puedes poner la zona de piedra y arena esta etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dshingle
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118133942
dsaneus (2022-03-12 21:42:43+00:00): Hola jbtc.

He visto que en este conjunto de cambios has eliminado 52 vías con la etiqueta "highway=construction", que forman parte de las obras del tramo Totana-Totana de la LAV Murcia-Almería.

Entiendo que ha sido por accidente, al utilizar el complemento Reverter de JOSM. Ya lo he corregido, revirtiendo parcialmente tu edición. Hay que tener mucho cuidado al revertir conjuntos de cambios, y prestar atención a lo que se borra y lo que no.

También he modificado la glorieta sobre la Rambla de la Santa que has etiquetado como puente. En lugar de asignar la carretera como puente y capa +1, he modificado la rambla como túnel y capa -1. Al ser una superficie bastante grande, se puede considerar que no es un puente. Además, la glorieta como puente no queda bien visualmente.

Un saludo.
~dsaneus
jbtc (2022-03-12 22:49:30+00:00): Hola dsaneus.
Sí, fue por error mío, no me di cuenta de que afectaba a las vías en proyecto.
Lo siento. Y gracias por resolver lo de la glorieta en puente.
Saludos.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-10 00:34:22+00:00): Please don't add fake buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118134153
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Konkon153 (2022-03-05 17:16:54+00:00): [ und damit alle 205 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Granzin vollständig angepasst ]
b-jazz (2022-04-08 16:45:46+00:00): Hi CountryDon,

Thanks for helping to improve OSM by adding so many golf courses. The community appreciates it.

I was hoping I could reach out to you and correct the way you are working around bunkers that are in the middle of fairways or roughs. Check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037383941 for an example. You are tracing around the "outer" feature, and then making this kind of cul-de-sac where you come towards the bunker and surround it before continuing back out to the enclosing feature.

What you really want to do is combine two different ways (outlines) by creating a "multi-polygon". It is very simple to do. Just draw and tag the inner bunker, and then with a new way, draw the outer fairway/rough and tag it as well. Then select both of those features at the same time by holding down the shift key and clicking each. Then either press "c" to combine/merge them, or right click on either selected why and look for the big "+" in the pop-up panel and select it to merge them both into a multipolygon.

If you have any questions or run into any problems doing this, please reach out and let me know and I'll help you out. Thanks!

Happy Mapping.
CountryDon (2022-04-11 20:07:32+00:00): Thank you for explaining that technique. I will use it going forward.
eggie (2022-03-05 18:42:11+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. 

Prima actie.. Ik heb wel van de highway=footway een highway=path gemaakt.
Wanneer er een bord G7 staat is het pas een wandelpad.
Wanneer er niet gefietst mag worden dan kun je evt. vehicle = no bijtaggen.
De stuw heb ik wel weer ingetekend, maar die routeert niet.
Gr eggie
marc__marc (2023-05-30 14:05:56+00:00): Bonjour
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118346444
survez 2002 ? ou 2022 ?
dans les 2 cas je te conseille fortement survey:date bien plus facile d'utilisation que l'extraction d'une date parmis plusieurs valeurs de sources
Cordialement,
Marc
hatul (2022-03-19 20:19:33+00:00): שלום, השילוב של השביל האדום והכחול בנחל מכוך לא הגיוני. גם לפי מפת סימון שבילים האדום אמור להיות רציף. יכול להיות שבטעות סימנת את האדום בתור כחול?
hatul (2022-03-19 20:20:37+00:00): חוץ מזה, הסימון האדום במפה מפסיק פתאום באמצע הנחל. לפי מפת סימון שבילים הוא ממשיך עד נערן.
Dindia (2022-03-20 23:06:37+00:00): אני לא שיניתי את הצבעים. אולי במהלך דיוק השביל התבלבלו הנקודות
hatul (2022-03-21 10:29:30+00:00): טוב, תיקנתי עכשיו את הצבעים.
תוכל להשלים את הסימון עד מבואות יריחו?
Glassman (2022-03-05 23:40:18+00:00): Can you explain why it was downgraded from trunk to primary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118136385
Joseph R P (2022-03-06 00:13:22+00:00): Trunk is reversed mainly for long-haul routes or those that connect important places, like US 12 and US 95. This is just an unsigned arterial serving the southern Lewiston/Clarkston area with expressway characteristics.
eggie (2022-03-06 07:52:25+00:00): Dag P..  Je vraagt feedback.  Het gebouwtje staat verder niet in de BAG.. Lijkt me dus oke om het zo toe te voegen mbv de luchtfoto.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-06 07:49:22+00:00): Hi user.. you asked for feedback
Seems okay to me. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=collector

Greetz,
eggie
borovac (2023-01-27 09:54:21+00:00): Hi mtekla,
you have remove highway from this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156545134 and tagged this way like barrier=lift_gate.
I assume you meant that there is a gate somewhere near the parking. I do not have a source to confirm where is the lift gate, can you please check this and put the highway tag back on this way. Lift gate tag as such a node with barrier=lift_gate.
All best Milan (borovac)
mtekla (2023-01-29 21:30:23+00:00): Hi Milan
It is a dirt road with a barrier at the barking. It's not a highway. The road can be found on Google streetview.

mtekla
mtekla (2023-01-29 21:31:07+00:00): Hi Milan
It is a gravel road with a barrier at the parking. It's not a highway. The road can be found on Google streetview.

mtekla
literan (2022-03-06 10:35:01+00:00): не надо ставить на дороги теги foot=no, bicycle=no

Это теги юридического запрета движения. Эти теги можно поставить только если правилами запрещено перемещение пешком или на велосипедах (например, военный объект)
marczoutendijk (2024-12-12 19:36:16+00:00): Hi Henri97,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037399959
building=path is very weird.
What did you want to tag there?


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Henri97 (2024-12-13 13:31:47+00:00): Hi Marc,
you're right. That was just wrong. I just fixed it.

Thank you for the hint!
Henri
literan (2022-03-07 11:58:33+00:00): там сейчас стройка

тропы вы нарисовали тяп-ляп (не присоединили у другим тропам, нарисовали тропу туда-сюда поверх себя самой). Такая отрисовка нам не нужна, если вы не можете вносить правки аккуратнее, пожалуйста, поищите другой проект
silversurfer83 (2022-04-07 18:14:44+00:00): Kann es sein, dass du bei deiner Arbeit die Relation "Strumpfweg" gelöscht hast? Oder anders: Warum gibt es eine Strumpfwegrelation in v4 während es doch vorher schon eine in v43 gab?
Grüße
Stf748 (2022-04-09 03:47:47+00:00): Die Relation Strumpfweg war zwei mal vorhanden.
Beide Versionen hatten einen Fehler. Eine der Relationen habe repariert. Die zweite Relation habe ich gelöscht.
Falls ich was falsch gemacht habe kann das aber auch gerne korrigiert werden. Ich war mir sicher das richtige zu tun.
Gruß und danke für den Hinweis.