piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
krusefahrer (2022-04-20 20:51:30+00:00): Hi conifer,

are you gonna fix all Essex_Boy farmland?
conifermapper (2022-04-20 21:31:45+00:00): What exactly do you mean by 'fix' Essex_Boy farmland
taccola (2022-04-23 10:44:10+00:00): Ho eliminato dal nome "scoperto da".
E' una mappa. Per inserire info usare un tag info
krusefahrer (2022-04-20 20:53:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ColdWaterSeal (2022-04-22 21:25:38+00:00): Source correction: SDFE
impiaaa (2022-04-21 14:53:54+00:00): Other mappers would appreciate it if you wrote more detailed changeset descriptions, so that they could know what was changed without having to look into the details. For example, "Added addresses". See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
krusefahrer (2022-04-20 21:02:04+00:00): Please use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments or nothing.
dbqeditor (2022-04-20 21:26:00+00:00): @krusefahrer  I dont have time. At least I'm fixing the map. As to your other comment, I can do what I want to the buildings. Quit criticizing and just start mapping. you are new to this and can say nothing.
Allison P (2022-04-22 06:37:44+00:00): Users have been blocked for unhelpful changeset comments in the past. It's not a criticism to point out that you should do something. I don't know what "other comment" you're referring to; this user hasn't commented on any other of your changesets.
taccola (2022-04-23 10:47:19+00:00): Poligono inesistente. L'ho eliminato perchè creava confusione. Non esiste l'area di tutela dichiarata. Varranno le leggi standard di navigazione sottocosta.
Mordechai23 (2022-04-21 14:53:50+00:00): Co takiego poprawiłeś? 

Ja tu widzę, że podzieliłeś 2 budynki na 6 wymyślonych nie wiem na podstawie czego
kornad (2022-04-26 16:25:40+00:00): Wrong construction tag: this is landuse, not building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120220053
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
vasony (2022-04-23 05:53:11+00:00): Hello!

What is your source for Méhkas utca? This is a service road to Céh Zrt. not a residential road.

Tamás
ui: magyarul is jöhet
DF1989 (2022-04-23 18:28:19+00:00): Üdv,

Földhivatali adatok szerint az érintett terület önkormányzati tulajdonban lévő kivett közterület, amelynek neve "Méhkas utca", hrsz 1953. 

A Céh Zrt. a Dió utca felől közelíthető meg. A Céh Zrt (1955/6 hrsz), valamint a tárgyi út (közterület) között találó egy másik ingatlan is (1954/2 hrsz).
vasony (2022-04-24 05:53:45+00:00): Üdv!

A földhivatali adatokban "felülvizsgálat alatt" szerepel, tehát nem mérvadó.
A Méhkas utca 1986-ban szerepel utoljára térképeken, a lakótelep építésekor megszűnt.
A hivatalos utcajegyzékben sem szerepel. A helyszínen sincs nyoma.
Ennek megfelelően az old_name értékbe pakoltam ezeket az értékeket.

Tamás
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-09-24 07:27:39+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
kartler175 (2022-04-21 16:46:05+00:00): Please fix or remove boundary relation completely:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.61103&lat=44.63455&zoom=16&opacity=0.95
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-04-21 18:43:11+00:00): fixed
Dimitar155 (2022-04-21 10:36:52+00:00): Everything looks excellent. Cheers!
Frans S (2022-04-21 08:30:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
Buildings needs to be tagged as building=yes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119973201
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-09 23:50:28+00:00): What source was used for these edits?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
yorados (2022-04-21 17:25:23+00:00): Hi,

wenn möglich für Zentrale Tags wie amenity=
nur einen Wert vergeben, nicht mehrere mit Semikolon. Siehe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator

Viele Grüße
Carsten
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 23:12:22+00:00): Please check available imagery before adding roads. Some of these roads you added go directly over houses.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_8101879 (2022-05-10 14:54:46+00:00): Hi,

good work. But be careful not to forget the role outer on the borders of the relations boundary :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

Best regards
Diego Krein (2022-05-10 21:07:38+00:00): Thank you very much, if my mistake for mapping in a hurry with little time.
MxxCon (2022-04-21 05:00:34+00:00): Hello.
Please don't delete address nodes if they are accurate. 
Address nodes are still useful when searching for specific address or other similar uses. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119974883
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MxxCon (2022-04-21 05:07:44+00:00): Hello.
Please STOP deleting legitimately mapped features!
Trees and address nodes are perfectly valid features to be mapped in OSM.
This edit is going to be reverted!
If you continue vandalize the map you will be reported to DWG!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119975375
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
woodpeck (2022-05-13 11:55:00+00:00): Individually mapped trees are not "spam tags". For many people, a tree is more important than some obscure realty business's opening hours. Don't delete trees.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PT-53 (2022-04-21 06:38:55+00:00): Hallo Oihoha,
das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053471021/history
ist keine residential sondern eine (private) Zufahrt und das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053471020
iost kein Feldweg zur Erschließung von Äckern oder Wiesen!

Das sind für mich keine Verbesserungen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-04-21 06:43:10+00:00): Besteht dieser Feldweg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053471019/history
wirklich aus losem Schotter.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface=gravel?uselang=de
Das bezweifle ich doch sehr!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PLima785 (2022-04-22 14:10:10+00:00): Olha a rotunda do Radar
laborim (2022-04-22 18:57:52+00:00): não percebi o comentário
laborim (2022-04-22 23:28:13+00:00): foi preciso ir à concorrência para perceber a referência
Frans S (2022-04-21 09:16:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119976039
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Frans S (2022-04-30 12:14:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Please use the correct Imagery (Maxar instead of Bing).
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119976101
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MxxCon (2022-04-21 05:10:43+00:00): Hello.
This library is already mapped as tags of its building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119976163
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-21 15:32:59+00:00): As i hope you already know, building have multiple Street numbers on the county surveyor maps, so for proper function of the map for others not part of this Ridgewood map gang all the addresses on the building need to have either individual names of businesses. Or same business name in all available county verified street numbers on a building. Thanks. P.s no other community on here has been as negative on these upgrades as Queens OSM GANG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119976163
MxxCon (2022-04-21 15:38:39+00:00): I'm not sure what Queens osm gang you are talking 🤨
Your edit goes against "one feature, one OSM element" rule as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-26 18:09:30+00:00): oh... so how do buildings with multiple county addresses have them tagged... thanks. Oh the OSM gang here in Queens is petty and aggressive. We have not encountered this much resistance to needed updates anywhere else. Some of the tags we've been updating haven't been updated in months maybe years and we keep getting complaints about the changes.
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-26 18:13:53+00:00): so this building has 2 address numbers 20-02, 20-12... how is that handles by OSM?
MxxCon (2022-04-27 03:21:22+00:00): If a building's numbers are on the same street, they can be added to the building's addr:housenumber tag separated by ","
If numbers are on different streets, they should be mapped as separate address nodes. Both cases are documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers

I have no idea what "gang" you are talking about, nor what "aggressiveness" you are referring to. When edits to the map are questionable or low quality, they should be fixed, regardless of where they are or who made them.

If you and your associates performed questionable edits elsewhere and didn't get called out or corrected, it simply means they went undetected for now, not that they were ok edits.
Btw, the fact that you and others are mapping for Upland without publicly disclosing it in your profile goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organized_Editing_Best_Practice I highly encourage you and others to follow that or your accounts will be referred to DGW(moderators of OSM).
OSM has a set of rules and guidelines everybody agreed to and must follow. Otherwise the map will turn to shit. There are too many inexperienced users, conflicting and ulterior motives to allow people edit the map willy-nilly without reviewing edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .