piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VictorIE (2022-11-16 15:02:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360939090

Summer Court may be the name of the building / apartment development, not the street. In Ireland, address and street don't always coincide. :)
clay_c (2020-11-24 18:29:47+00:00): Hi,

How come you added railway=station and removed building=train_station from an underground building outline? There is already a railway=station node describing Millennium Station. Station buildings and stations are two different things.
nickvet419 (2020-11-24 19:04:33+00:00): An underground corridor as outlined in this area is not considered a building and shouldn't be mark as one. You wouldn't mark a tunnel as a building.   The corridor should though be marked as a station within the station area as documented in the wiki instructions for marking train stations. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations  The millennium station/mall area is what should be and was marked as the building station.   The areas that were marked for this station and Union station might also need adjusted to only cover that station area and not the entire underground corridor.   You are also right that if an area is used, the node does not need to be used.   We should discuss if it best to use nodes or area for underground stations.
clay_c (2020-11-24 19:33:41+00:00): The diagram in the wiki is helpful for tagging a simple above-ground railway station. Thanks for pointing out that the diagram is inadequate for underground stations. One of these days I'll get around to adding a tagging diagram for a complex underground station to the wiki.

The excavated areas containing indoor railway infrastructure would be considered underground buildings. They may contain many indoor areas and railway platforms inside them. Consider looking at other underground stations, such as Grand Central Terminal in NYC or the stations along the Market Street Subway in SF, on http://openlevelup.net/ to understand the tagging scheme involved.

Have you discussed with any other mappers what constitutes an underground building versus an underground indoor area? If this tagging scheme seems strange to you, perhaps you could bring it up on the tagging mailing list.
eggie (2020-11-23 15:08:06+00:00): Het feit dat je de boekhandel niet zietkomt omdat de nodes te dicht bij elkaar liggen. Je kunt ze ook iets van elkaar leggen of één iets meet de winkel in.
Het heeft niets te maken met het adres.
mvg,
eggie
markymark3000 (2020-11-23 15:19:05+00:00): dank voor je feedback
sovereign_ch (2020-11-23 17:54:08+00:00): Änderungssatz aufgrund kommentarlos gelöschter POI revertiert. Bitte das wiki konsultieren.
bhietsch (2020-11-25 04:30:55+00:00): Hey, thanks for reverting this! Would you mind taking a look into reverting the changesets that deleted this park nearby? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5429983 
I was going to give it a try... But not very experienced with the reverts yet and probably would've just created more issues.
iandees (2020-11-25 22:49:16+00:00): Can you link to a changeset that has more of the deletions? I was looking through their changesets and haven't been able to find where they deleted more of the park.
bhietsch (2020-11-26 02:34:03+00:00): I believe it was deleted by changesets 91777463, 91777587, 91777706, and 91777922. Possibly others, that's just what I could find from the relation history
elgon (2020-11-27 19:27:45+00:00): Hi, my work was also affected by this vandalism. I would ask for reverting these woodlands, which were deleted in changeset 94516482, 94518069, 94512033, 94516119, 94517368, 94512605, 94516861.
iandees (2020-11-28 00:35:39+00:00): I spent a couple hours trying to revert those changes but there's so much going on there and so much time has passed that it became really difficult. This user and their alternate accounts seem to have deleted a *lot* of data in the area ...
elgon (2020-11-29 22:56:34+00:00): I've restored those woodlands, waterways, and some roads. I've noticed that almost all roads, often with significant tags, have been deleted. It's still a lot to repair. This user has been already blocked, but I think that in case of detected vandalism, admin or other entitled user, should both immediately block the user and block (i.e.=withdraw) such changesets.
mike140 (2020-11-23 22:21:51+00:00): Hello! In this batch of edits, you deleted a lot of multipolygons and replaced them with regular polygons - what caused these actions? Don't like multipolygons?
!bm (2020-11-29 20:26:57+00:00): s. Anm zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94594723
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94646330
!bm (2020-11-29 20:27:01+00:00): s. Anm zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94594723
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94646444
user_5359 (2020-11-23 20:30:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
OBJECTID=6
SHAPE_Leng=509.312071926
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Nakaner (2020-11-24 09:34:51+00:00): Hallo,

in Baden-Württemberg haben wir vor ein paar Jahren die Gemeindegrenzen vom LGL bekommen und importiert. Wenn du Grenzsteine mappst, kannst du den dazu passenden Punkt in der Grenzlinie mit diesen Attributen versehen. Man kann dann davon ausgehen, dass der Stein bis heute Teil der Abmarkung der Grenze ist.

Bitte verschiebe die Grenze aber nicht, denn dein GPS ist sicherlich ungenauer.

Bitte beachtet, dass wir Namen nur für Eigennamen verwenden. Wer rechts und links des Steins ist, lässt sich anhand der Grenzlinie und der sie referenzierenden Grenzrelationen ermitteln.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geomaplex (2020-11-30 16:31:59+00:00): You added foot/bicycle=no to the street, but it does not look like they are not allowed there.
I don't think this tagging is the right way
Nakaner (2020-11-30 18:08:27+00:00): Hi pe1aqp,

please use foot=use_sidepath and bicycle=use_sidepath if footways/cycleways are mapped as separate ways. Use bicycle=use_sidepath only if the usage of the cycleway is mandatory (expressed by traffic signs number 237, 240 or 241).

@Geomaplex Du darfst gerne ausführlichere Änderungssatzkommentare schreiben. ;-) Ich habe mir mal die Freiheit herausgenommen, mich einzumischen.

Best regards

Michael
aixbrick (2020-12-01 11:37:01+00:00): @Nakaner: Der User möchte offenbar ein bestimmtes Ergebnis in seinem genutzten Router erzwingen, siehe auch die Kommentare in der Vergangenheit: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1765961.
pe1aqp (2020-12-01 12:32:51+00:00): Dear all,
Thanks for your feedback.

But I must say, I'm a bit puzzled by some of these comments.

I do not use "my router", not even a "preferred router"; I simply use the
router(s) for cyclist on the www.openstreetmap.org main web-page.  As
many occasional visitor to this web-page will do.

These routers give, in areas that I know quite well, poor results.  To
the extent that I will not use these routers for cycle-trips in areas
where I'm less familiar.  (I will use the map itself, just not the routers.)

With "poor results", I mean things like:

- lists of instructions talking about only "unnamed roads" (like "Turn
  left onto unnamed road"), where the main-roads do have a names, but the
  associated foot- and cycle-paths don't.
- routing over roads where I would hope to never see a cyclist,
- routing over steps, instead of over the ramp alongside it.
- jumping between main-road and associated cycle-path for no obvious reason,
- taking turns where it simply forbidden for all other road users (and the local regulator take active steps to prevent cars taking that turn.
- etc.

Quite possible that I do use the wrong tags, or approaches, to address
these problems.  Better suggestions are welcome.
pe1aqp (2020-12-01 13:25:30+00:00): @Nakamer: At this T-crossing, we do have an DE:241 sign. (Two actually.) For the east-going cycle-path along the Vaalserstr.
Jonathan Haas (2020-12-01 14:33:00+00:00): The routers on the openstreetmap.org website are quite poor. There are much better routers in apps that use OSM data. In any case, please don't add wrong data to the map, even if it may improve routing here.

There are other uses for map data.
user_5359 (2020-11-23 20:27:09+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
AREA_HA	19408.066589
CODIGO_VER	95015014
COD_DPTO	95
DESCRIPCIO	NULL
DPTOMPIO	95015
FUENTE	DANE
NOMBRE_VER	PATIO BONITO
NOMB_MPIO	CALAMAR
NOM_DEP	GUAVIARE
OBJECTID	31565
SEUDONIMOS	NULL
ShapeSTArea	195566725.994867
ShapeSTLength	73523.3070927864
VIGENCIA	ESRI
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
blackboxlogic (2020-11-29 22:48:35+00:00): You moved an address (7 Prescott Drive) to be connected to the road (corner of Prescott Drive and Coffin Lane). We try to have addresses separate from the road where possible. I assumed this was a mistake and I've separated it back out.  Also, you moved Coffin Lane south east, but there was already a road there, so now there are two roads in the same spot. I didn't find a street sign in street level imagery, and the street doesn't exist in the MEDOT dataset that I have, so I couldn't determine what it should be.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94646732
Kport Addressing Officer (2020-11-30 13:37:01+00:00): Hi, this area is very confusing, and I realized that I had put Coffin Lane in the wrong place.   Where I had originally put the road, is not a "developed" road. Where I moved Coffin Lane to was/is a road that was never named.   As for not finding it or no street sign.  The town just ordered the street sign, so it may not be placed until the spring of 2021.  
I appreciate your patience while I slowly figure out how this system works.   If there is any helpful hints or guidance you could offer, I would greatly appreciate it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94646732
blackboxlogic (2020-12-04 00:33:27+00:00): I've deleted the unnamed road, so it is no longer duplicated..
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94646732
eggie (2020-11-23 16:14:06+00:00): De fietspaden heb ik ook aangepast en de man made bridge.. nu wel  direct met de juiste naam. Als eenmaal ergens de naam fout staat neemt JOSM dat automatisch over. Den k dat het nu overal goed is. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-23 16:24:57+00:00): De wikidata staat nog onder de oude naam
Shaun das Schaf (2020-11-24 19:27:02+00:00): Hallo Powerfuzzy,

momentan ist die Wiese als Garten eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460802928
Ist die ganze Wiese ein Spielplatz? Dann wäre es vermutlich sinnvoller, die Fläche als Spielplatz statt Garten einzutragen. In diesem Fall sollte dann aber der von dir eingetragene Punkt wieder entfernt werden, sonst hat man die Information doppelt.

Und hat der Spielplatz wirklich den Namen "Kinderspielplatz"...?

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-11-23 17:35:00+00:00): Hi. This changeset spans over a very large area, but its description isn’t very descriptive. Can you check whether the changes made outside Italy were on purpose?
Dardy (2020-11-23 17:47:22+00:00): Hello, I made some fixes reported by Osmose validator on my changes. You see this huge area as I changed some weeks ago this landuse (313694393) near Venezuela (for a HOT task project), but it overlapped with another landuse, so i fixed it.
All other changes are in Italy, so the resulting bounding box is huge
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-11-23 19:21:33+00:00): Thanks for the precision! In the future, don’t hesitate to submit small changes like the one in Venezuela in a separate changeset, to avoid notifying everyone in between.
Dardy (2020-11-23 19:55:06+00:00): For sure, thanks for the information, I was not aware about this notification.
5m4u9 (2020-11-23 22:21:30+00:00): hola, al final el oficina de guías o centro de la mujer?
francians (2020-11-23 17:30:18+00:00): Togli anche il ref
L'imaginaire (2020-11-23 23:41:57+00:00): 👍
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-31 02:20:38+00:00): is this road private? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817641624
JAAS (2022-03-31 15:20:33+00:00): Obrigado por perguntar...

Yes it is, and a very unusual scenario: - This is considered a very exclusive residential zone, in which the residents won a long legal battle with the municipality over the rights to use this particular road - privately. Entering from the North side there is a lift-gate which ONLY opens to residents with an electronic 'tag'; and to enter from the South side there is another 'tag-only-required' lift-gate entrance as well, but this is the only entrance where visitors can enter/exit, but must previously identify themselves at the gate and ask for permission to enter. I'd consider it private.
richter_fn (2020-11-23 17:13:50+00:00): Приветствую.
1) Похоже, вы не совсем точно выравниваете подложку. Например, вы довольно сильно подвинули здание на Бойном переулке, 9 и здания рядом (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28341621), а также здания в промзоне на берегу Камы, хотя они уже были отрисованы по  выровненной подложке. Пожалуйста, убедитесь, в том, что у вас нет смещения:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков.
2) Вы проставили building=industrial всем зданиям, находящимся на территории ИК-29 и CИЗО-5. Сложно представить, что совершенно все они имеют такое назначение. Кроме того, некоторые здания у вас наезжают друг на друга.
Пожалуйста, постарайтесь быть аккуратнее.
michalfabik (2020-11-24 14:33:14+00:00): Pozdrav, koja vrsta prodavnice je ovo?
Kakanj (2020-11-24 14:53:58+00:00): Mala trgovina, klasicna prodavnica za svakodnevne potrebe. Pozdrav
michalfabik (2020-11-24 15:06:31+00:00): Ok, hvala, ispravljeno.
Willem Altes (2021-02-16 19:09:48+00:00): Beste Paul M3,
 Waarom is dit (de Inlaagse dijk: naam ontbreekt in OSM; het staat er alleen bij voor het deel ten westen van de A9) als private aangeduid? Deze dijk was tot de Elisabethvloed in 1421 de belangrijkste verbinding over land tussen Amsterdam en Haarlem en is daarna (1426 oplevering Spaarndammerdijk) altijd openbaar gebleven.  Ik heb deze laatst vanuit de oostkant gefietst. Er staat geen enkel verkeersbord dat toegang beperkt (zie ook Mapiliary).  Het is ook toegankelijk vanuit de Westkant. Met vr.gr. Willem Altes
Paul M3 (2021-02-17 08:38:27+00:00): Beste Willem,
Je bedoelt de weg die net ten oosten van de A9 bij iets van een manage begint? Ik heb dat geïnterpreteerd als een weg die bij die manege hoort. Dat er dan niets staat dat het verbiedt, zegt niet zo veel omdat dat bij de meeste maneges/boerderijen niet staat. Maar zo te horen heb jij andere informatie, waarvoor dank. Daar wordt het alleen maar beter van.
Willem Altes (2021-02-17 22:44:39+00:00): Beste Paul,
Ik reed de track vanaf het oosten op en dan is het stuk langs het erf niet het begin. Je moet er daar even af, maar na het tunneltje onder de A9 kan je er weer links op. Het is overigens ook een apart perceel op de kadastrale kaart. 
Groet,

Willem
Willem Altes (2021-02-17 22:46:01+00:00): Voor de kaartliefhebber: een kaart uit 1615 waar deze opstaat: https://proxy.archieven.nl/0/37139EC7EBDA42E8ACB5A1D1502336F4
Paul M3 (2021-02-18 10:38:28+00:00): Leuk! Mijn geboortehuis staat in Ruigoord, is hier nog weinig van te zien.
user_3022894 (2020-11-23 16:44:52+00:00): Hi soemisch,
ich will dir kein Unrecht tun, aber kann es sein, dass du den Fußweg, der diesen Aufzug: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2344501110 auf der oberen Ebene mit dem Bahnsteig verbindet, gelöscht hast?
Irgendwie muss der Aufzug - ja an den Bahnsteig angebunden werden. Ansonsten erkennen Router nicht, dass über den Aufzug zum Bahnsteig geroutet werden kann. So, wie es auch hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310207049 gemacht ist.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
user_3022894 (2020-11-23 16:48:07+00:00): Ach und noch etwas: Der Aufzugschacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304660157) selbst ist nicht überdacht (covered=yes). Viel Mehr ragt der Schacht ja mit seinem Dach aus dem Bahnsteigdach heraus. Ich würde dem Aufzugschacht-Way einfach roof:shape=pyramidal verpassen. Genau genommen müsste man aus dem Bahnsteigdach sogar ein MP machen, aus dem der Aufzugschacht mit seinem Dach dann herausragt. Kann das gerne in Kürze umsetzen. Viele Grüße, Lukas
soemisch (2020-11-26 06:32:33+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
dankeschön für Deine Hinweise. Ich habe heute den Fahrstuhl so bearbeitet; sogar das Bahnsteigdach ist jetzt ein MP.
Viele Grüße, Lars
user_3022894 (2020-11-26 15:54:45+00:00): Super, sehr gut, vielen Dank!
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-27 22:25:13+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2475139 ?
user_5359 (2020-11-26 05:03:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/876222086: What is the meaning of tag factset2020=yes? If you want to notice the source of our data please use the tag source=factset2020
ika-chan! (2020-11-23 16:19:10+00:00): The source was supposed to be Maxar-Premium.
eggie (2020-11-24 12:27:46+00:00): Beste Tuffmoor. Je kunt via het forum om import vanuit de BAG vragen. Je hoeft niet zelf de  gebouwen in te tekenen.
Kies het draadje verzoek BAG import. 
Dit geldt ook voor de nieuwbouw in Weesp. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-23 17:28:01+00:00): Hey there,

Don't forget to square square buildings. You can square square buildings by selecting them and hitting the "Q" button in iD. Or, by (shift) right clicking on the object(s) and clicking "Square".
Note, you may need to manually adjust corners to be more square before you can square them (L-shaped and more complex buildings).

You can check the Help menu in the right sidebar in iD for more hotkeys.
Once you feel comfortable with iD, you can switch to a more advanced editor such as JOSM which will give you more options and help to avoid common problems like nodes sticking to ways you don't want them to stick to.
Andrea Del Sarto (2020-12-23 16:45:36+00:00): salve,
il tag name fa riferimento al nome ufficiale, per i nome dei percorsi mtb va usato il tag mtb:name

saluti Andrea
Tomas Straupis (2020-11-23 20:20:21+00:00): Šitie plotai nėra pastatai. Nuėmiau pastatų žymas.
RicoElectrico (2020-12-16 02:59:58+00:00): Cześć, wg tej uwagi Gruntowa mogła być usunięta przedwcześnie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2458890 

Z góry dzięki za sprawdzenie.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-24 13:01:15+00:00): ahi estamos bien
iandees (2020-11-23 20:37:11+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94660982
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94651866
fkv (2020-12-03 06:44:34+00:00): Dafür, dass du laut deinem Profil deine Mitarbeit eingestellt hast, editierst du ganz schön viel. Das wär ok, und im Weinviertel hast du ja schon viel Positives beigetragen. Aber deine letzten Edits sind weniger großartig. Du hast einiges, was ich vor ein paar Tagen mühsam vor Ort gemappt habe, total verpfuscht. Ortsnamen als Straßennamen, wahrscheinlich von der Basemap abgeschrieben, dafür die richtigen Namen (Güterwegnamen) gelöscht. unclassified auf service geändert, obwohl Zufahrt nicht nur zu einzelnem Objekt. Bitte hör auf mit sowas und mach das überall dort, wo du es gemacht hast, rückgängig.
fkv (2020-12-03 08:56:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 95209444 where the changeset comment is: CS 94652169 revertiert, siehe meinen Changesetkommentar dazu
chlenix (2021-03-04 08:28:09+00:00): Откуда данные о размерах станции? На максаре панелей меньше. Проверьте, пожалуйста.
redrace (2020-11-28 10:44:26+00:00): HUHU
Ich habe den Änderungssatz mal revertiert, weil es existieren immer noch Luftbilder mit den Gebäuden! Die Adressdaten habe ich auf "old" gesetzt!
Laslo Hunhold (2020-11-28 10:54:35+00:00): Alles klar! Danke dir für den Hinweis; dann werde ich darauf in Zukunft noch mehr achten. In ALKIS sind die Häuser auch noch verzeichnet.
redrace (2020-11-28 11:39:28+00:00): Kein Ding! Ich lasse sowas eigentlich immer drin, schon alleine darum weil es bestimmt mal jemanden gibt der "historische" Karten haben will und dann diese taggs rendert! :-)
yop_tup (2021-08-05 09:32:56+00:00): A change has been made in the name of the beach "Playa del Russo" adding information about the place.
These descriptions must go on the description tag and not on the name.
I wait for your answer.
eggie (2020-11-23 20:22:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
user_2066394 (2020-11-23 19:59:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123510883 hat highway=* verloren
Pikse (2020-12-13 14:32:09+00:00): Teelõik 876252674[1] ei kuulu Sompa tee koosseisu. Sama hiljuti muudetu joone 875080889[2] kohta, mis ei kuulu Suru tänava koosseisu. Tänavate ulatust saab kontrollida maa-ameti kaardilt[3].

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/876252674
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875080889
[2] https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/app/adsavalik
eggie (2020-11-23 20:31:59+00:00): Dag Joost.. access=private is voldoende. bicycle=no is overbodig dan. 
MVG,
eggie
jleedev (2020-11-23 18:38:42+00:00): I repeat myself: Zip code 16509 is Erie, PA. For example, the web page for Wegmans at https://www.wegmans.com/stores/erie-peach-st-pa/ says Erie, PA 16509. I will be correcting these.

Please read the wiki and understand that tags are used in certain ways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Hans Thompson (2020-12-08 01:12:59+00:00): Excellent Edit! :)
bxl-forever (2020-11-23 21:33:20+00:00): Hello,
The changeset is okay.

For benches, a suggested extra is the "backrest" tag (yes/no).  A possible use case is someone writing an app where you can find a suitable bench.  Not essential, only if you feel like providing it.

For bollards, do not bother with the `Allowed access' box in the iD simple editor.
By default, all routing engines assume that a bollard prevents entry for all users except for pedestrians and cyclists.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard
bxl-forever (2020-11-23 21:19:19+00:00): Sorry to break in again but this change is not the right way of doing.
A node (or "point" in the iD editor) contains a lot of information: this is the address for a building and more stuff, e.g. the UrbIS official reference.
If you delete it, the whole information disappears entirely from the map → housenumber 159 disappeared completely after your change.
The good way to do it is:
* if the hotel is gone, you go in the list of tags and you remove everything that relates to the hotel (tourism=hotel, the name, the phone number, etc.)
* but you keep the node, especially all the legal information, because that should stay.
In OSM, we can search for the history of every node, it helps to make statistics or see how a place changed over the years; this would not work if we deleted stuff and had to create a new one some time later.
Hope this helps.
(In the mean time I fixed this.)
jncn (2020-11-24 18:21:32+00:00): Thanks for the explanation and help! Much appreciated.
woodpeck (2020-11-24 09:34:21+00:00): Please explain how you identify the objects you are "correcting" in this fashion, what corrections you are making, and how you are complying with the long-established rules for mechanical edits (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits).
nikolauszirwes (2020-11-24 11:31:39+00:00): Hi woodpeck,
i'm new on openstreemap. The article you mentioned is interesting but new for me.

My intention is to use the openstreetmap data for a (private) software project. During the evaluation of the data i found some data which is wrong (from my point of view). So i decided to fix them.
e.g. roles for relation members like "plattform", "platforn", "platfoorm", "Platfor" are typos which should be "platform".
If i did this the wrong way, please let me know, what is the correct way to do such changes?
kind regards,
Nikolaus