piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sanniu (2017-01-05 11:50:32+00:00): Please tag railway stations according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station?uselang=en-US
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Martin868 (2017-01-12 15:49:44+00:00): This is kink of cheap to do that. They were not hurting anybody This is pretty much inhabited land. They were useful to the Zwift users. Mapped as cycleways there were not to be confused with anything else You should not just deleted stuff. Post a note and let the discussion take place if you wish.
captain_slow (2017-01-12 16:13:29+00:00): hello martin,
this discussion already took place, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33727115 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/432843
what is the benefit of this non existant way in the database? just to see it in strava?
if this ways really belongs in osm, then revert my changeset. this would bring back the ways and nothing else.
regards
matt
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Supaplex (2017-01-04 09:13:49+00:00): 請問這是填墓中間的通道嗎?
WWSS (2017-01-04 09:47:37+00:00): 是指隧道旁的階梯嗎？那的確是通道，但是明顯規劃出來的主通道、不是墳墓之間的間隔。
Hjart (2017-01-04 08:55:59+00:00): Jeg vil absolut mene det er upassende at tagge denne som secondary
Hjart (2017-01-04 10:44:04+00:00): Jeg har indtil videre tagget vejene her som tertiære. Bemærk at det var fint i første omgang at rette til tertiær. Vi har i OSM tidligere tagget stort set alt der ikke officielt var sekundærruter eller højere som unclassified https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified, men jeg er nu begyndt i større omfang at opgradere til tertiær hvor det giver mening.
Hjart (2017-01-04 10:47:25+00:00): Bemærk også at OSM er et selvstændigt produkt og at vi ikke har nogen intention om blot at være en kopi af de offentlige data.
Mads Borggaard (Lemvig Kommune) (2017-01-04 10:54:58+00:00): Jeg ved godt at det ikke skal være en kopi af de offentlige data, men hvis de ikke afspejler disse data, så kan jeg forestille mig at de måske på et tidspunkt fremstå som utroværdige, hvis der er for stor forskel mellem de offentlige autoritative data i Danmark og OSM.

Men jeg kan også godt læse på OSM Wiki med hensyn til vejklasserne at det nok er det bedste med tertiær.
Hjart (2017-01-04 11:01:44+00:00): Personligt går jeg efter at lave et fornuftigt produkt. Jeg har ikke nogen decideret ideologi om at vi absolut skal det ene eller det andet. Der er dog mange steder hvor de offentlige data ikke giver mening (som i tilfældet med den sti jeg rettede) og der vil det være fjollet bare automatisk at "afspejle" de offentlige data.
Mads Borggaard (Lemvig Kommune) (2017-01-04 11:04:51+00:00): Der er vi helt enige, og der retter vi så de offentlige data til, og jeg mener at hvis der stødes på sådanne andre undringer, så bør man skrive til den pågældende kommunes GIS afdeling så de kan få det rettet i de offentlige data, på den måde får vi også et bedre produkt der
Hjart (2017-01-04 11:11:30+00:00): Det kan du have fuldstændig ret i. Bemærk dog at jeg personligt ikke bruger megen tid på at skele til de offentlige data når jeg arbejder med OSM, så for mit vedkommende vil evt uoverensstemmelser ofte gå ubemærket hen.
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
pnorman (2017-01-06 07:51:59+00:00): Hello, welcome to the pacific northwest.

The community in the area tends to meet up in Seattle or Bellingham, although I'll be trying to get a Vancouver meetup going this year.

I was actually in Blaine two days ago, so it must have been close to the time you were here.
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
bielebog (2017-01-04 12:01:00+00:00): Aber der Parkplatz wurde doch sicher nicht überbaut, oder? Wenn der Parkplatz noch existiert (nur für private Nutzung), sollte er stattdessen mit access=private gekennzeichnet werden. Schließlich wollen auch Mitarbeiter und eventuell Kunden vom eingetragenen Parkplatz profitieren und sich direkt dorthin routen lassen können. Auch beispielsweise Supermarktparkplätze sind ja nicht öffentlich und trotzdem eingetragen.
bielebog (2017-01-04 12:12:05+00:00): Mit Changeset 44893509 ist nun der 'verrutschte' Hohle Weg korrigiert.
editor13 (2017-01-04 14:48:56+00:00): Wenn der Parkplatz eingetragen ist, wollen vielleicht auch Leute dort parken. Das ist jedoch nur den Kunden erlaubt. Deshalb bitte keine entsprechende Anzeige.
bielebog (2017-01-04 20:27:42+00:00): Genau für diesen Zweck gibt es das access=* Tag.
Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dcustomers ist das entsprechend beschrieben.
Beispiele dafür in den aktuellen Daten in Detmold finden sich unter http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l3B
editor13 (2017-01-04 21:07:07+00:00): Verstehe das nicht. Ich bin Eigentümer des Grundstücks und will den Parkplatz komplett löschen. Wie geht das? Wird nämlich immer noch angezeigt. Oder braucht die Technik einfach eine Weile? Für Hinweise bin ich dankbar.
bielebog (2017-01-06 23:35:04+00:00): Der Parkplatz ist – leider, siehe mein obiger Kommentar – in den Daten gelöscht, was auch recht schnell in der Standard-Kartenansicht widergespiegelt wird. Da die Kartenkacheln gechached werden, hilft sicher einfach mal neu laden, ggf. mit Löschen des Browsercaches (z.B. mit Shift-Reload im Firefox).
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 14:03:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
gileri (2017-01-04 22:57:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Le restaurant est déjà mappé en tant que chemin (par tes propres soins :) ) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82399909
cquest (2017-01-08 18:10:31+00:00): doublons fusionnés... et pas besoin de remettre aussi l'adresse en doublon ;)
gileri (2017-01-09 22:13:13+00:00): Merci !
maraf24 (2017-01-04 17:26:40+00:00): Biuro nieruchomości zajmuje cały narożnik?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100943384
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-04 10:28:55+00:00): Please note that attaching adresses to roads in most cases makes no sense and usually will be considered an error.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 15:23:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Alecs01 (2017-01-14 13:20:27+00:00): Thanks for the additions, but this was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2707110
RobJN (2017-01-07 19:04:56+00:00): Hi, Thanks for contributing to OSM. If you were wondering why the path didn't show up it was because you hadn't marked it as a path. You need to draw the line (as you did) then specify that it is a path.

I've fixed this now so it should appear soon.

Also you can view all paths we know the legal designation for on: http://product.itoworld.com/map/87?lon=-1.84506&lat=52.20955&zoom=13&fullscreen=true&open_sidebar=map_key
mueschel (2017-01-05 09:41:00+00:00): Hi,
please don't put tags like this
Catandaan HighSchool=yes
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463579172

The other tags like amenity and name already describe the object well enough. Non-standard tags like "Catandaan HighSchool" don't help OSM because there is no software that can interpret them.

Cheers, Jan
maraf24 (2017-01-04 17:24:58+00:00): Zakład optyczny zajmuje cały budynek? Nie sądzę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100934117
Derick Rethans (2017-01-04 11:10:44+00:00): Hi!

And welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your note says that you live here, but then you map it as a shelter? That's for giving shelter in forests. What you want to map this at, is a building, with address information (street, housenumber, and postcode). 

I realize Maps.me probably doesn't allow you to do that, but you can edit it right on the OpenStreetMap site at http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=4588696798#map=19/51.57421/-0.28867 (with the same username/password that you've used for Maps.me I think).

cheers,
Derick
BCNorwich (2017-01-04 18:07:52+00:00): Hi, I've drawn in a house from Bing imagery around that node, tagged it as a house and noted that you shelter there. Please check and add any other info you can.
hadw (2017-01-09 13:18:24+00:00): I thought there was a general principle that we did not map information about private individuals.  If nothing else, it creates Data Protection Act responsibilities - full redaction may be needed if there is a a complaint.

Also mapping internet_access=wlan seems to me to imply at least  customer level, if not public access; I presume this is really private access to the household.  Whilst this might be a BT one, with BT customer access on the side, mapping those will be impossible to maintain.
BCNorwich (2017-01-09 18:23:48+00:00): OK. Reverted my own changeset.
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 15:34:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Ogmios (2017-01-30 15:01:22+00:00): 👍
lostmike (2017-01-04 19:53:21+00:00): This is a map not a business directory. Is this an actual business premises that people can turn up to? Will there be free coffee?
RitterR (2017-01-06 20:57:24+00:00): PL:urban is not correct value for maxspeed.
I change to number value.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 15:57:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
maraf24 (2017-01-05 13:12:11+00:00): A dlaczego bez komentarza?
Warto napisać, że zmieniono nazwę ulicy i podać źródło, np. uchwałę lub artykuł w gazecie.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 16:01:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2017-01-06 11:52:04+00:00): Hi,
the tags you put on the roads do not fully match your description: If you want to allow busses _only_, you also have to close the road to other traffic, e.g. by an additional
motor_vehicle:backward:conditional = no @ 06:00 - 22:00.

Let me know if you need help!
Jan
AmZaf (2017-01-06 12:07:43+00:00): Thanks for your attention. I added the motor_vehicle  restriction as a default value when the conditional restriction does not apply, i.e. after 10 p.m. This means that the backward lane is open to all traffic after 10 p.m. 
OSM documentation referenced below says that a conditional restriction is more specific than a general one and there should be a default value as a fall back when it does not apply.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
mueschel (2017-01-06 12:13:03+00:00): This applies only if it's the same key, e.g. vehicle and vehicle:conditional. 

A key like 'bus' doesn't make any assumptions on other type of traffic. I'd suggest:

motor_vehicle = no  #closed for the major part of the day
motor_vehicle:conditional = yes @ 22:00 - 06:00  #allowed 22 - 06
bus = yes   #always allowed
AmZaf (2017-01-06 12:16:39+00:00): I'll make the relevant changes. Thanks you.
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
Supaplex (2017-01-04 17:10:48+00:00): 不好意思，這段捷運應該還在施工吧，請維持施工的tag
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 16:21:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].