piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:56:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Alexander-II (2018-03-25 02:00:47+00:00): В этом пакете поломался запрет поворота: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/336558/history  
Исправляю.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jvanoort (2017-04-20 08:45:40+00:00): Oeps, iets te hoog geplaatst. Kan deze nog weg? Ik plaats zo ook de juiste wel. Excuses
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 08:56:45+00:00): Inderdaad, je zat 900m te hoog.
Ik heb deze node inmiddels verwijderd voor je.
Abendstund (2017-04-20 10:00:12+00:00): Moin,
du hast mein Changeset hier zurückgesetzt. Es wäre zunächst nett gewesen, hättest du mir einen Kommentar dazu hinterlassen.

Das in der Note beschriebene Problem ist aus meiner Sicht gefixed - jedenfalls routen sowohl Mapzen als auch OSRM nun aus der JVS von Osten kommend in die südliche JVS - das in der Note beschriebene Problem ist damit keines mehr.

Wenn du nun schon kommentarlos zurücksetzt, wäre aus meiner Sicht zumindest sinnvoll, hättest du das Problem anschließend selbst behoben.

Beste Grüße
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
DD1GJ (2017-04-20 08:56:38+00:00): Korrekter Changesetkommentar: Parkplatz wird abgebaut, Quelle: Mail der Stadt Hannover
samely (2017-04-20 16:38:55+00:00): Hi, I saw you deleted `name:en` for many places, I'm wondering if you can improve the names rather than delete them. 
Regards,
Eliane
hsimpson (2017-05-03 20:28:41+00:00): Hi, is there really no connection between the junction Olpe->Bonn and Bonn->Aachen?
Marabu_Too (2017-05-04 11:39:57+00:00): Physically there is, legally there isn't; before the little bridge  was finished in mid April, those traveling from the South to the West and those traveling from the East to the South (lots during the rush hours) had to cross paths; due to the bridge this is no longer necessary.
There is no "hard" separation (yet?), but there IS a double unbroken line.
I drew the lanes this way mostly so that the many OSM based satnav apps "know" that legally it is no longer possible to reverse direction from South/North to North/South using the intersection but that you have to go around the roundabout a bit furthrt north.
hsimpson (2017-05-04 11:46:49+00:00): Hi, if there is no hard seperartion, it's wrong to draw two lines. The correct way woult be a change:lanes=no|no on the line. So please revert your changes and use the change:lanes Tag instead.
Regards
Marabu_Too (2017-05-04 11:53:22+00:00): ...further north.
Marabu_Too (2017-05-04 12:12:11+00:00): I did as you asked - should I then generally change the way I treat the word "proposed"? I always took it for granted that such tags were not yet valid and didn't use them at all.
hsimpson (2017-05-04 12:22:00+00:00): Hi, the point is, that lane-mapping ist generally wrong. change:lanes is a good way to avoid this conflict and it's used quite often: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/change%3Alanes#overview
Sometimes it's better to use a Tag, which isn't "official" yet, because the other ways would be even worse. And the number of usages is a good indicator if it's ok to use this Tag.
Regards
Marabu_Too (2017-05-04 16:18:45+00:00): Thanks - you learn something new every day!  ;-)

It'll be interesting to see - in about a month - whether my favourite satnav app takes note of this tag.
Владимир К (2017-07-05 10:04:38+00:00): не пишите высоту гор в название
Dalkvist (2017-04-20 10:21:27+00:00): 
Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 
Är det en park öppen för allmänheten?
Det ser mer ut som en innergård på flygbilderna.
trigpoint (2017-04-20 17:59:36+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188281048 does not need to be mapped as a tunnel. The road is already mapped as a bridge.
Genoma (2017-04-20 18:01:31+00:00): good point thanks I'll change it
Alecs01 (2017-04-22 17:28:01+00:00): Hi, the hotel was already on the map http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/298986172 I deleted your entry
Dalkvist (2017-04-20 10:11:49+00:00): What source did you use? It looks a bit offset from the gps traces.
mathias_on_the_road (2017-04-20 20:54:14+00:00): Hm, I used the MapBox satellite images. 
The shape of the feeder matches the image better than the gps traces. 
Usually I like using the gps traces. This is strange.
Dalkvist (2017-04-20 20:59:23+00:00): Mapbox is often a bit offset, in ID and josm you can realign the images with the gps traces but I don't know if you can do that in go map
mathias_on_the_road (2017-04-20 21:10:10+00:00): I checked again. The ways in the editor are aligned with the satellite image and the gps traces. 
Only the rendered tiles show the old location which I corrected today. 
I also changed the roundabout from highway=unclassified to highway=trunk
Dalkvist (2017-04-20 21:46:21+00:00): It looks a bit of to me http://i.imgur.com/42D5FDT.jpg perhaps I'm being picky, it is much better then before :)
aseerel4c26 (2017-11-26 20:39:19+00:00): Hast du den kompletten https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47770890 durchgeschaut? Was war da passiert? Ein Versehen? Hattest du den Bearbeiter angeschrieben?
Владимир К (2017-04-20 10:51:48+00:00): немного неправильно. Надо порезать полигон landuse=allotments на части по территориям СТ и повесить названия на них.
sergey02 (2017-04-20 10:56:30+00:00): Я бы с удовольствием, но там не разберешь где границы. Так хоть приблизительно понятно где, что находится. Старался точки ставить в центре СТ.
Владимир К (2017-04-20 11:00:13+00:00): >Так хоть приблизительно понятно где, что находится.

только вот отображаться они нигде не будут :) place=allotments кажется вообще для адресации
sergey02 (2017-04-20 11:05:28+00:00): Ну вот, а я то думаю, чего они на карте никак не появятся :))) Ну хоть в поиске есть. Потом тогда гулять буду попробую найти границы и переделаю.
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 11:41:41+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 11:42:14+00:00): Zo te zien ben je goed bezig!
Probeer je een beetje te verdiepen in de spelregels, als je dit nog niet gedaan zou hebben.
OSMAPD (2017-04-20 11:45:52+00:00): Zeker. Wel een beetje vaag dat niet alle nieuw toegevoegde POI's al op de map staan, ondanks dat OSM aanheeft dat binnen enkele minuten na de edit te doen....
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 11:51:02+00:00): Je kunt het render proces versnellen door SHIFT+F5 te drukken in je browser (chrome)
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 11:51:48+00:00): Overigens rendert niet alles, als je vragen hierover zou krijgen kun je me een berichtje sturen.
OSMAPD (2017-04-20 11:59:05+00:00): Ik zie dat maar 1 van mijn POI wijzigingen is doorgevoerd. Heeft dat te maken met dat jullie de wijzigingen eerst reviewen?
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 15:27:54+00:00): Nee dat niet
eggie (2017-04-20 15:44:29+00:00): Rendering in de mapnik gaat erg traag. met de Humanitarian layer heb je meer succes..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47966413#map=15/52.1843/5.9495&layers=H
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
eggie (2017-05-15 17:04:15+00:00): Googlemaps is echt taboe.. Dat mogen we niet gebruiken .. laat staan noemen. We krijgen daar binnen osm problemen mee.
In editor iD is al de nieuwste luchtfoto beschikbaar sinds deze weeek. kadaster pdok 2016.
De eerste mappingdays worden door ons gevolgd.. ook om te helpen.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:45:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2018-06-22 21:11:09+00:00): Uwaga dla Ciebie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1432445
mavl (2019-01-19 16:45:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-07 09:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52701609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47694801].
Commodoortje (2017-04-20 11:43:13+00:00): Je hebt een kerk aangebracht, hiervoor had je de node gebruikt die als zendmast in OSM stond.
Ik heb een kleine aanpassing verricht om de zendmast terug te krijgen.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47968855
OSMAPD (2017-04-20 12:31:00+00:00): Maar er staat in het echt geen zendmast ;)
mavl (2017-10-07 09:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52701609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47694801].
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
eggie (2017-04-21 13:33:36+00:00): Je mag er dan niet zomaar een fietspad van maken. Met bicycle=dismount was het goed getagd en zou het gewoon moeten routeren in de ofm. Dat het niet routeert komt door dat de surfacetag ontbreekt en het als onverhard wordt gezien.
Het voetpad/brug dient dan als tag surface=paved te krijgen.
eggie (2017-04-21 14:08:11+00:00): PB gestuurd...
eggie (2017-04-22 06:58:25+00:00): weer aangepast naar voetpad. Note met uitleg bicycle dismount.. surface paved
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
Alecs01 (2017-04-20 20:14:17+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che qui hai spostato alcune case e strade di qualche metro ad est in base alle nuove immagini di Bing http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47968128 attenzione a non fidarti troppo delle foto aree di Bing, l'ultima release per l'Italia è georeferenziata piuttosto male, specie nelle aree montuose, vedi es. qua http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Nuove-Immagini-Satellitari-Bing-td5892404.html Puoi correggere lo spostamento delle immagini anche con ID (l'ultimo menu delle impostazioni dello sfondo, "Correggi spostamento immagini") tenendo come riferimento le tracce GPS, comprese quelle di Strava http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava Nello specifico, mi sembra che fosse meglio prima, puoi vedere una traccia gps che seguiva Via Monte Grappa, e una nuvola di punti di Strava (bici) lungo quest'altra strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81641986 con JOSM si può fare facilmente il revert delle modifiche comunque, non è un problema.
In ogni caso se vuoi provare invece JOSM come editor al posto di ID, hai a disposizione qualche strumento in più, come la carta tecnica regionale e le ortofoto del PCN (2006 e 2012) che sono georeferenziate molto meglio. Ciao!
dannomaru (2017-05-03 09:16:25+00:00): Ciao Alcs01, scusa se ti rispondo solo ora e grazie per tutte le tue indicazioni. Avevo infatti notato recentemente uno spostamento delle mappe, dovuto all'aggiornamento di Bing che mi hai citato. Grazie che hai ripristinato quindi le modifiche errate da me effettuate. Ho provato oggi a utilizzare JOSM come suggerito, usando le Mappe di Mapbox per quella parte che sono andato a modificare. Quelle di Mapbox mi sembrano le migliori, e anche in linea con le altre da te citate, per questa zona. Buona giornata. Daniele
Alecs01 (2017-05-03 19:19:03+00:00): Di nulla, buona continuazione, ciao!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-04-20 22:07:32+00:00): You've not added Jupiter to the UofY Solar System relation
Alecs01 (2017-04-22 17:28:29+00:00): Please do not add personal data to the map, thanks
eggie (2017-04-21 13:37:21+00:00): Tip.. het is beter niet te beginnen met access=no..
Hier de accesstags in een schema. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Groen is default.
muralito (2017-04-20 23:06:34+00:00): Hola. Los "rest_area" son zonas junto a autopistas. No tienen sentido en el medio de una ciudad.
Protoxenus (2018-06-21 17:31:42+00:00): Hallo, 
the position of all wreck are north of the reef. Your DB entry is on a wrong position. All wrecks are already inserted.
Regards Protoxenus
Dalkvist (2017-04-20 12:42:53+00:00): Hej mapbox bilderna har ofta dålig lägesograhet dvs de är lite förskjutna så man behöver ibland flytta lite på dem så de stämmer med gps spåren[1]. Tror det är fallet här, jämför med bing bilderna som har bättre lägesograhet.
[1]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD
osamme (2017-04-20 13:42:51+00:00): Tack för tipset. Har justerat/ändrat tillbaka enligt bing i stället.
mavl (2017-10-07 09:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52701609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47694801].
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
eggie (2017-04-20 15:53:17+00:00): Oke.. serieus bezig!
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Ramying (2017-05-08 18:47:02+00:00): Perché hai spostato il nodo di Musocco dal centro del quartiere (Via Mambretti)?
fs25 (2017-05-09 10:06:08+00:00): Mi sono permesso di modificare l'indicazione del quartiere in quanto  spostata più a nord ovest rispetto al baricentro reale, tra la stazione FS Certosa e il cimitero Maggiore (di Musocco appunto).
Inoltre ricordo che l'ex edificio del comune di Musocco era situato in viale Espinasse, così come il monumento ai caduti ... solo una piccola area è situata a nord della ferrovia, pertanto appare fuorviante inserire l'indicazione dove è posta ora.
Ramying (2017-05-09 19:52:04+00:00): Ah, ho capito.
Non è sbagliato. Cioè, alla fine, mica hai messo il nodo Musocco in Viale Monza, per dire.
Però credo che la posizione più giusta dove mettere il nodo sia Via Mambretti.
Ti spiego: in Piazzale Santorre di Santarosa, è vero, si trova il monumento ai caduti di Musocco e si trovava il comune, però quell'area è Garegnano (entrato nel comune di Musocco solo verso fine 800). Se guardi nel catasto teresiano (http://www.asmilano.it/Divenire/ua.htm?idUa=10654931), il foglio 6 del catasto di Garegnano è proprio l'area lì. Quindi, per lo stesso motivo per cui a Figino si trova il nodo Figino e non Trenno, credo sia meglio lasciare il nodo nel centro preottocentesco di Musocco. Spero di essermi spiegato bene.
Ramying (2017-05-09 19:54:41+00:00): Poi, avere l'admin_centre fuori dalla relazione è un po' brutto, no? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6730554

Ecco i confini della relazione ricalcano i confini del comune di Musocco prima che Garegnano (con Piazzale di Santarosa), Vialba, Villapizzone e altri venissero aggregati.
Rimane fuori dalla relazione l'area di Quarto Oggiaro, che è una separata relazione.
literan (2017-04-21 11:25:59+00:00): здравствуйте! вы здесь задвоили санаторий - поставили теги и на точку, и на территорию. Точку уберу.
literan (2017-04-21 11:27:54+00:00): хм.... подозрительно серьезные виллы на территории этого "санатория"... Не иначе, как очень серьезные дети там "оздоравливаются"
saintman (2017-04-21 13:04:06+00:00): Точка была до меня, не рискнул убирать. Вообще, территория там еще больше, близлежащий парк, вроде, тоже к территории санатория относится... лучше пусть местные уточнят.
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-21 07:07:59+00:00): „(rejon wileński)“ is definitely NOT part of the NAME in any language.
Jay May (2017-04-21 09:47:05+00:00): Which name are you talking about? Sometimes when you add a name in a language it automatically adds some indications like "rejon wileński" and so on. Perhaps it is somehow linked with Wikipedia?
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-21 10:07:18+00:00): I do not use iD. I just see that data had name:pl="Kiemiany (rejon wileński)"

http://osmhistory.appspot.com/changeset/47972121
Jay May (2017-04-21 10:38:06+00:00): Hmmm... Strange. Anyway, as I told you - I remember it was made automatically. Perhaps to distinguish it from the village Кемяны on the other side of the border, which is also called "Kiemiany" in Polish. Technology mysteries :D
mavl (2017-10-06 19:15:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
woodpeck_repair (2017-04-21 15:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48007226 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally moved many nodes by more than 100km
pfg21 (2017-04-24 08:30:43+00:00): The transfer of points was meaningful, all objects after editing locally validated, and any errors found corrected. Asked to cancel the rollback edits.
pfg21 (2017-04-24 08:32:32+00:00): The map after edits in fully working state
woodpeck (2017-04-24 09:01:59+00:00): The move of the nodes in this changeset was clearly a mistake and has temporarily led to a broken map display. See  http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/47972480.png for an illustration.
pfg21 (2017-04-26 08:24:23+00:00): I always check the result of my actions in josm.
the error that shows in the picture, sometimes because of problems in the servers of OSM.
Mapnik when updating the tiles gets to the time when the position of points are changed, but the points still belong to the old lines.
If you send /dirty a while time after that, Mapnik redraws the tiles in fully new condition
woodpeck (2017-04-26 08:32:24+00:00): Are you saying that you have re-used node IDs for something entirely different in another area?
pfg21 (2017-04-26 09:09:36+00:00): Yeah, that happens sometimes
woodpeck (2017-04-27 07:38:51+00:00): 1. You shouldn't do that (re-use node IDs), 2. here's the Achavi link that shows the broken changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47972480 - this is not a temporary rendering problem, at least three ways were totally broken in your changeset.
Josef K (2017-04-26 11:53:42+00:00): Qual é a origem do caminho 488260553 que liga a quinta josé pinto com o bairro da liberdade passando por cima da linha de comboio ? A menos que tenham feito uma ponte recentemente, não parece possível.
meloy (2017-04-26 13:19:37+00:00): Uma coisa é desenhar caminhos com base nas fotos de satélite outra é passar no local  existe 2 túneis no referido sitio
Josef K (2017-05-08 17:51:02+00:00): Viva, peço desculpa se fui interpretado como agressivo mas não é a intenção, espírito de entreajuda e colaboração é o que se quer e me move. É que eu também conheço a zona, adoro explorar caminhos obscuros, e nunca dei com esse.
Por acaso passei lá este fim de semana e de novo não encontrei esse túnel. É possível que exista, mas não está sinalizado nem parece acessível ao público. Do lado nascente, há uns trilhos estreitos cheios de entulho que levam à linha de comboio, mas parecem acabar por ali. Do lado poente, por baixo do eixo N-S, toda a área está vedada com tapumes.
Sugiro que ponha mais detalhes na coisa: tunnel=yes, tags a especificar o estado do caminho, que parece bastante mau, provavelmente access=no onde o acesso não seja permitido, como parece ser o caso do lado poente.
Boas edições :-)