piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mahgninnuc (2022-07-07 14:55:28+00:00): Południowa pasuje do tej nazwy ulicy dlatego że jest na południe od lotniska Łódź Lublinek i jest na południu miasta Łodzi czyli na dzielnicy Łódź Górna. Głośna pasuje do tej nazwy ulicy dlatego że w okolicy jest głośno jak samoloty lądują na lotnisko i od tego że jest głośno od drogi DK 14 jak ludzie z Pabianic czy z Łasku jadą do pracy do Łodzi.
Felis Pimeja (2023-08-29 19:07:57+00:00): Площадь уже обозначена: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3365908
Ни к чему переделывать велодорожку.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122848308
iandees (2022-06-26 02:01:44+00:00): Hello! Thanks for making improvements to the map. Please be careful when you're moving the map around, though. It's easy to accidentally grab onto a road or building and drag it instead of moving the map. If you notice that happen, please undo the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122848315
GinaroZ (2022-06-27 21:44:41+00:00): Don't think historic=manor is the correct tag for this...
cRaIgalLAn (2022-06-28 06:31:37+00:00): Thanks for picking this error up. You are correct. I will delete the tag.
Leo Slager (2022-06-25 21:57:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2022-06-25 22:02:28+00:00): Hello Bakhtovar,

Dit is vast geen chalet. Het is een flatgebouw met normale woningen.
Je bijdrage wordt dan ook weer verwijderd.
Probeer je eerst wat in te lezen in de wiki vóór je weer wat gaat wijzigen.
Groet
Leo
ma-rt-in (2022-06-26 14:41:32+00:00): Hallo,

sind die Wege für alle gesperrt und der Forstbetrieb?

vg
fischosm (2022-06-26 18:15:54+00:00): Moin,

das Gebiet und die Wege dürfen nicht betreten werden! Auf den Schildern sind drei Gesetze genannt. Ein Traktor war da unterwegs, aber ob das jetzt der Forst oder Naturschützer waren...

tschüs
ma-rt-in (2022-06-28 15:39:22+00:00): Kannst du das Schutzgebiet mal einzeichnen. Und um welche 3 Gesetzte Handelt es sich denn?

Zu dem "Traktor": Du hast nämlich vieles gesperrt, aber motor_vehicle=forestry gesetzt. Das passt nicht so recht mit access=no und den anderen subkeys.

vg
fischosm (2022-06-28 20:16:48+00:00): Das Gebiet kann man nicht einzeichnen, da nur die gesperrten Einfahrten zu sehen sind. 

Genannte Gesetze:
§28a Landesnaturschutzgesetz
§20 Landeswaldgesetz
§44 Bundesnaturschutzgesetz

Der access ist so ok. Wenn Dir forestry nicht gefällt, wäre motor_vehicle=no möglich. Die wissen ja, dass sie da trotzdem rein dürfen.
felipeeugenio (2023-01-18 11:32:48+00:00): Hola. Cuál es la fuente de los nombres de los glaciares que agregaste?
gracias.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 20:05:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49478419/history has roof_shape = flat that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
Msiipola (2022-06-26 05:45:37+00:00): Hej! Angående hastighetsgräns (30). Enligt NVDB är hastighetsgränsen 70. Är du säker på din uppgift, och har detta ändrats på senare tid, eftersom NVDB säger något annat?
Msiipola (2022-06-27 16:11:27+00:00): Ok, då vet jag.
CAI Stabia (2022-06-27 13:36:08+00:00): Ciao, il rifugio S.Mihele da te mappato non è un bar, piuttosto essendo il rifugio vero e proprio inattivo, potremmo definirlo un'area picnic, come riportato dal cartello all'ingresso.
baprischka (2022-06-27 14:05:56+00:00): Ciao, grazie non sapevo come mapparlo perché anche se si chiama "Rifugio" non mi sembra un vero rifugio dove si può dormire. All'interno c'è un bar, un bagno e altri spazi. Correggo.
ovruni (2022-06-25 23:15:06+00:00): Hola, le había escrito anteriormente sobre los prefijos en las vías, sin respuesta de su parte, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
Osmwithspace (2022-07-15 16:56:45+00:00): Hallo Nano36100,

wenn das Picknicktische sind, dann ist amenity=bench falsch.

Grüße Osmwithspace
Nano36100 (2022-07-18 19:37:53+00:00): Hallo Osmwithspace,
ich war das ganze Wochenende unterwegs und muss erstmal noch ein paar andere liegengebliebene Dinge erledigen. Ich schau mir das dann in 2-3 Tagen nochmal an und melde mich wieder. Aber schon mal danke für den Hinweis, scheint tatsächlich nicht korrekt zu sein.
VG, Nano36100
Nano36100 (2022-07-20 15:58:13+00:00): Du hast recht, amenity=bench war an dieser Stelle falsch und du hast es ja auch schon gelöscht.
Ich schreibe auch bei Picknicktischen gerne die Sitzanzahl dazu, weil ich das für eine nützliche Info halte. In JOSM geht das am einfachsten, wenn man die Vorlage "Sitzbank" verwendet und zum Schluss amenity=bench wieder löscht. Das hatte ich aber vergessen.
VG, Nano36100
mariotomo (2022-06-25 22:48:00+00:00): disculpa, qué quiere decir "error en al clave de"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122851899
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 02:53:04+00:00): buenas noches, truck_link no se uso en el segmento para identificar el cambio de las vías.
user_8655426 (2022-06-26 02:05:24+00:00): Hello,
In reality most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that.
Please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard.

You have uploaded 500 changesets in just two months. However, it's a good idea to slow down a bit and continue editing while learning the mapping rules little by little.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122852299
user_8655426 (2022-06-26 02:08:07+00:00): I think the following pages will be useful.

Zh-hans:新手指南
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E6%96%B0%E6%89%8B%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97

learnOSM
https://learnosm.org/zh_CN/

Mapping with OpenStreetMap (English / 日本語)
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/

Zh-hans:编辑标准和惯例
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E7%BC%96%E8%BE%91%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E5%92%8C%E6%83%AF%E4%BE%8B

Good practice (English)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Zh-hans:Good changeset comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments

Armchair mapping (English)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping

Let's create an accurate and useful map!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 09:20:26+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4907453 ?
mueschel (2022-06-26 08:54:01+00:00): This looks like an undiscussed import. 
What is the source of all the data? 
It seems the sizes of all the "buildings" is quite wrong, they appear to be much smaller on aerial images.
There are many foreign tags that don't look like they belong to OSM, and you ignored thousands of warnings from the editor when uploading the data.

I suggest to revert the whole import for now, so that you can start a proper import as described in our guidelines from scratch.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2022-06-28 09:53:06+00:00): This seems to be an import of some kind and I found several issues:

- house numbers are duplicated, they were already in OSM before

- it uses many non-standard tags:

addr:quarteirao 	29
compartimentos 	3
deposicao:rsu 	txovas
fornecedor:agua 	FIPAG
localizacao:torneira 	Exterior
population 	8
toilet 	pour_flush_toilet

- it contains private data. Things like the number of inhabitants of a building should not be in OSM.

Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki and not to disclose any sensitive data about people.
Remígio Chilaule (2022-06-28 17:53:37+00:00): Hi @mueschel thank you very much for reaching out. It is inspiring to know the community is being attentive.

Please allow us a couple of days to get back to you with a proper answer to each of the questions you raised. For now let me advance these brief comments:

- we are mostly well-aware of the recommended mapping procedures and ethics. But we also try to push the possibilities that the platform gives us as far as possible. This sometimes includes creating work-arounds when we don't find a conventional way of contributing to the Map, but we know and ensure to always stay within the boundaries of what is right. We would love to discuss the data (for instance number of inhabitants) in more detail, and please know we left out a whole lot of data that we considered private.

- the OSM tagging system has a very strong western-bias, and a lot of features and attributes that are common and important in African informal settlements are not accounted for in the official tagging lists. This is a much broader issue that we would be very happy to discuss more about.

As I said we will provide a more detailed response to the questions raised, and we are open to removing any data that is deemed inadequate after we discuss. 
Again many many thanks for your contact, talk soon.
mueschel (2022-06-28 18:21:54+00:00): Thanks for the reply!

I think several of these issues can be fixed easily.

- we do have a complete set of tags for toilets
- "addr:quarter" or "addr:district" should be adequate instead of quarteirao (based on Google Translate)

I don't know what the other tags mean, translation is not really helpful.
Remígio Chilaule (2022-06-28 18:44:39+00:00): Thank you very much. We will correct the toilets as per your suggestion (found this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toilets). Will also replace quarteirao as you suggested. Will look once again for similar replacements to the other custom tags we created. Will let you know. Many thanks,
Remígio Chilaule (2022-06-28 18:49:34+00:00): Actually could not find addr:quarter on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr). And addr:district doesn't work because it is a higher level admin boundary, one that groups several neighbourhoods (that we tag addr:subdistrict). I don't see anything suitable below addr:subdistrict level that would correspond to a block...
mueschel (2022-06-28 19:00:42+00:00): It seems the addr:* table is missing several rather common tags. 
E.g. addr:neighbourhood has 1.5 million use cases, but is not mentioned in the table.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=addr%3A

addr:block is mentioned in the wiki, maybe this fits as well?

I'd say that this is really "pick what seems to fit", preferably one of the keys that is already used elsewhere. Sub-divisions of towns are so diverse across the world, it's really hard to find a precise common scheme.

Could you give an explanation of the other tags? Then I could help searching.
BunnyFluff (2022-06-26 01:17:15+00:00): Forgot source:
Bing
OS OpenMap Local (April 2022)
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:12:56+00:00): Fixed an error. Thanks for the contribution. #OMGuru
Iain I (2022-06-26 16:29:21+00:00): Just wondering if the LADD3 channel should be added as a frequency tag over a road name
saffa87 (2022-06-26 21:21:47+00:00): Debatable. It's something I started doing after having seen someone else do it and really liking the idea. Road safety is a very important thing on these roads. It's always good to know a logging truck is coming at you or letting one know you're just around the next corner. Road frequencies are often only posted right at the beggining of a road and very easy to miss for numerous reasons. If you're on a radio controlled road & not calling you risk: your safety & on this particular road ($1500 first offence fine for not calling "Must Calls" at any single lane bridges).

I personally download OSM to my Garmin and by having the Radio Frequency in the name I know I'm good as it's easily visible. Technically speaking it may not be correct but the reality is we use OSM for Navigation & this further aids that cause.
Iain I (2022-06-28 01:09:16+00:00): Not disagreeing with the need for this type of addition and I agree it makes it very visible in the name. I think it is very helpful. Two questions. One is adding the "LADD3" to the name changing the names from being searchable as it now has a different name. Two should we be adding this information to a frequency tag in addition to what you are doing?
saffa87 (2022-06-28 01:46:00+00:00): I wouldn't think so, the roads that these frequencies are assigned to are not the types one would be searching anyways - they don't have addresses linked to them, in these areas one is typically going by a given coordinate or by km markers to find where you're going. When searching road names, one only has to partially fill a name for results to display negating the influence the frequency added to the end has whilst searching. Roads can have more than 1 name by means of "alt_name" attribute which I believe is searchable too.

I don't believe the frequency attribute was intended for Radio frequency but rather the frequency of how often something occurs but may be wrong. Either way frequency attribute is not something readily available to navigation users of any kind.

I'm no pro at this, just an enthusiast like most others on here. Just trying to help navigators but quite possibly making "errors" as I go.
mueschel (2022-06-26 08:55:37+00:00): Please don't try to fix any issues with nodes and ways here. This is an undocumented import with many mistakes that most likely needs to be reverted in full.
gscholz (2022-06-26 09:44:01+00:00): Thanks for this hint, but it arrived too late.
Guido
mrpulley (2022-09-03 10:47:40+00:00): Just wondering what the note you added is for. You've added the note "Turn restriction needs one via way" to these relations, however all 4 of them already have a via way in them. Am I missing something?
TheSwavu (2022-09-03 20:56:03+00:00): It means what it says. These turn restrictions need to use a way as the via rather than a node. The note is to let mappers know this and to allow me to filter out the ones that I have not checked yet.
TheSwavu (2022-09-03 23:41:41+00:00): For context there are about 5130 no left turn restrictions in AU. Only 27 of them need to use a way as the via. So it's more likely that a new left turn restriction with a via way is a mistake than really needing to use a way as the via.
user_2066394 (2022-06-26 09:56:20+00:00): TS
grawal (2022-07-02 16:19:13+00:00): Ok per i tag. Però a mio avviso andrebbero applicati anche ai tratti successivi della strada in oggetto in quanto risentono delle stesse limitazioni.
canfe (2022-07-03 05:22:43+00:00): Sì vero. Provvedi tu che io non passa da un po'?
grawal (2022-07-04 08:33:32+00:00): Va bene. Faccio io.
Frans S (2022-08-27 09:19:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122856078
BubbaJuice (2022-06-26 06:06:18+00:00): Road access restrictions based on survey.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-26 22:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Carto_Graph (2022-07-31 14:18:04+00:00): На углах не должно быть никаких тегов.
karf101 (2022-06-26 07:22:51+00:00): Ledsham Footpath 5
RicoElectrico (2022-06-26 15:47:50+00:00): Wow, pierwsza edycja 12 lat od założenia konta! Rzadko się zdarza :)
M!dgard (2025-01-01 14:47:44+00:00): Hi, please only add Wikipedia links in the native language of the area you're adding them to. In Flanders we speak Dutch. Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-06-27 11:23:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9847595848 (one of over 200 objects). What is the meaning  of the tags
compartimentos = *
deposicao:rsu = txovas
fornecedor:agua = FIPAG
localizacao:torneira = Exterior
?
Don‘t add private information about the household to OSM!
population = 7
What is the source ofthisinformation? Whitish the license of this source?
PPete2 (2024-03-27 10:27:38+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier mit deinen Bachverlauf-Änderungen leider auch die Oberösterreichische Landesgrenze zu Niederösterreich verschoben, sodass sie nun abschnittsweise nicht mehr stimmt. 
Bitte beim nächsten Mal darauf achten, dass ein Grenze nicht immer exakt dem Bachverlauf in der Nähe folgt, danke.
highflyer74 (2022-06-26 14:04:43+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Sei so nett, Dinge nicht zu löschen, sondern sie, wenn es geht, anzupassen. Die Objekthistorie geht sonst verloren, und das versuchen wir zu vermeiden.

Lies Dir am besten einmal folgende Links durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße!

PS. Wenn Du weiterhin bei OSM helfen möchtest, schau auch gern mal auf unserem monatlichen Bremer Treffen vorbei: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community
highflyer74 (2022-06-26 14:18:25+00:00): Edit: ich habe das alte Objekt wieder hergestellt und die von Dir hinzugefügten Daten dort eingefügt. Dann war da noch ein doppelter Umriss vorhanden, welchen ich entfernt habe. Auch das Datumsformat von start_date=* wurde dem in OSM üblichen Format angepasst. Schönen Abend Dir!
JeroenHoek (2022-06-26 13:21:01+00:00): Wat is het nut van deze edits?
Larmax (2022-06-26 20:28:35+00:00): Miksi lisäsit kohteita toiseen kertaan nodena? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Scottie0001 (2022-06-26 13:57:20+00:00): Welcome! I would like to let you know that you have made your edit correctly. So you are aware, I have moved the original node to a building under building #26325671 and also added some additional tags to supplement the tags currently there. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask anyone. If you haven't already, have a look at the Australian wiki page found below:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia
Leo Slager (2022-06-30 10:06:51+00:00): Prima zo.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 12:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Langlaeufer (2022-06-26 11:13:17+00:00): sieht soweit gut aus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122860299
GPar (2023-09-28 08:14:37+00:00): Ciao Jrachi, 
Il tratto finale di strada della Blina 524667827 genera qualche problema con i navigatori quando si richede il calcolo del percorso, probabilmente perchè è taggato come access=private.  Però è anche l'unico tratto che collega i due sentieri tra Lanzo e Roc del Merlo, quindi il passaggio credo debba essere consentito. Che si fa? Lo togliamo o mettiamo permissive? 
Grazie
Jrachi (2023-09-28 09:20:46+00:00): È una strada privata con un unico accesso chiuso da un cancello/sbarra e cartelli (un po vecchiotti).
Se il navigatore non è per escursionismo ha ragione!
Mi sembra che arrivando dal sentiero non ci siano cartelli regolatori, si potrebbe tranquillamente togliere access=private in quel tratto.
Così non dobbiamo litigare con i router.

Ivo
GPar (2023-09-28 18:33:45+00:00): Ho tolto il tag access=private
p.s. Il navigatore era per escursionismo, provato anche osmand e altre app danno lo stesso problema, ma ora  dovrebbe andare.
Grazie
rhtb0 (2022-06-26 11:55:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 12:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SekeRob (2022-06-28 16:12:06+00:00): Hi,

Suggest you move Lupelli back to right, the same building as the Ferramente is, really. side by side under the same balcony. The reference is the marked crosswalk hidden by the tree looking from space. but exactly halfway the north side of the lidl supermarket..

ciao
Il mappatore pazzo (2022-06-29 11:20:04+00:00): Hello SekeRob,

I fixed it. Thanks for reporting.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 13:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 12:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 13:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 13:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 13:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
osmapper7 (2022-07-16 17:27:43+00:00): 请问这些changeset里添加的建设中道路、建筑等等现在是已经开始建设了吗？还是仅仅是规划之中？
如果是规划中但还没有兴建，采用 proposed=* 标签更加合理，这样不会影响当前的地图，因为地图上只应该描述现状，否则会影响地图使用者。

另外，对于正在兴建的东西，标签是  building=construction, highway=construction, landuse=construction or railway=construction
看到你有些 building=construction 应该使用 landuse=construction 更加合适，因为并不是单一建筑物。 参考 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
Frans S (2022-07-09 11:01:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:


A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

B: Overlapping buildings drawn.

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122861515
MikeN (2022-06-26 23:06:44+00:00): Hi, I believe TIGER is wrong here - the Greenville County GIS shows both the road and house addresses as just 'Packridge'.    While GIS might be in error, the sign shows the same thing on Bing Streetview.