piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Verdy_p (2020-06-24 15:14:21+00:00): La partie maritime est déjà cartographiée avec son alias.
C'est surtout le reste du riverbank qui est à compléter dans sa partie fluviale
Le linéaire lui est complet aussi dans sa partie maritime, avec son alias et là encore il faut compléter le linéaire en amont dans la partie fluviale
Mais pas besoin de deux relations, une seule suffit pour tout (y compris pour référencer les relations membres pour les affluents avec le rôle "tributary")
Cette relation peut contenir l'alias aussi avec la clé "alt_name=*" (je ne suis pas sûr que "old_name=*" soit approprié car c'est encore en usage)
Verdy_p (2020-06-24 15:21:43+00:00): note: une riverbank peut aussi être une relation de type multipolygon avec des chemins non fermés. C'est déjà le cas mais il y a bien un fixme indiquant qu'il vaudrait mieux le couper le deux pour la partie maritime avec "tidal"
L'alias "Rivière de Landerneau" pourtant s'emploie aussi dans la partie fluviale sur la commune de Landerneau elle-même, mais pas tellement plus en amont (inutilisé à Landivisiau par exemple, mais aussi à La Roche-Maurice ou à Plouédern). Ca fixe la limite d'usage de ce "alt_name".
Pour le "Dourdun" c'est le plus ancien nom (old_name:fr=*) de tout le fleuve avant la rebretonisation officielle en français sous le nom Elorn. "Dourdun" n'a jamais été employé en breton.
trial (2020-06-24 15:43:47+00:00): En breton c'est Dourdu (les Eaux Noires ou Profondes).
Il semble logique que la Rivière de Landerneau ne soit pas appelée ainsi en amont. Le découpage en maritime/tidal et fluvial est logique. Je ne vois pas comment indiquer tidal=yes sur une relation si ça ne porte que sur la moitié !
alt_name pour La Rivière de Landerneau, old_name pour Dourdun.
mariotomo (2021-06-01 16:33:43+00:00): hola.  muy tarde, sorry, pero es que estoy buscando la fuente de este "width=25" y parece salir de este conjunto de cambios.  no será que te acuerdas qué es el valor 25? lo heredaron las calzadas, que diría son de 7m de ancho, las de dos carriles.  me puedes ayudar?
ArielRod (2021-06-01 16:53:58+00:00): Hola Mario. No recuerdo. Puede ser un error. Es cierto que las calzada tiene 7 metros + 1  metro a cada lado de calzada + 2 metros de isleta. En total hace 20 metros.
mariotomo (2021-06-01 19:11:43+00:00): hola y gracias Ariel.  entonces está bien ahora pues ahí donde encontré 25 le puse 7 después de haber comparado con la foto aérea.  en JOSM hay un complemento para visualizar los carriles, muy útil.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:13:22+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183282998/history seems to have similarly merged way layer tags as the other changeset
user_4493657 (2017-04-25 19:37:01+00:00): CorineBH jesteś człowiekiem?
user_4493657 (2017-04-26 21:57:23+00:00): Pytam bo dane które zaimportowałeś są bzdurne. CarineBH Please correct data accuracy. The current data are partial misleading.
opendcc (2016-06-25 05:45:12+00:00): Hallo,

viele Häuser - aber alle irgendwie krumm und schief. Sieht auf der Karte schon irgendwie komisch aus .. es wäre toll, wenn Du da ein bischen verbessern könntest.
DaxServer (2017-03-21 11:47:42+00:00): The node 2012811784 seems to have copied from Google as the user pointed the same in a tag! It seems most of the ways and nodes in this changeset are deleted, I'm deleting the node 2012811784. Another node for the same amenity exists as 3076349893.
GerdP (2015-11-04 17:47:19+00:00): please review:
I've fixed some wong tags near this bridge,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190680820
See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35084427
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:15:10+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190716622/history has mangled layer tags here.  I'm guessing that you just split it from the way to the north, but do you know what the layer should be here?
Владимир К (2017-05-04 12:34:02+00:00): Добрый день! 
Хочу узнать откуда вы взяли название реки Брылык?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190582956

Судя по википедии Брылык это вот эта река https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466374883 

По http://textual.ru/gvr/index.php?card=181849

вообще ничего не понятно. Пытаюсь разобраться, надеюсь с вашей помощью получится.
IamCrazy (2017-05-04 17:02:45+00:00): Сейчас уже не помню, ориентировался по вики и http://textual.ru/
Наверное, ошибся, ориентировался на то, что устье находится у деревни Кузембетьево.
Нужно исправить.
Владимир К (2017-05-05 06:25:16+00:00): да нет, это вики получается наглым образом врет :) вот скинул человек https://www.google.ru/maps/@55.6364615,52.7548548,3a,75y,138.26h,87.66t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1s_dK9-YgNMG5zwhs0rzaOqQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i38
neuhausr (2016-02-26 20:21:12+00:00): Hi, I just noticed this changeset added piste:type=nordic to every NODE on all of these ways, which seems incorrect.
yvecai (2016-02-26 21:29:58+00:00): Ouch, that was ugly. Luckily it's not a lot of ways. I think I can fix that.
yvecai (2016-02-26 23:06:54+00:00): Ah, that was 55 ways! I had to do a big changeset again (37473259) to remove piste:type=nordic from the nodes belonging to this changeset's ways.
Might be a few nodes remaining if a way has been split since, though.
neuhausr (2016-02-27 13:09:29+00:00): thanks :)
aceman444 (2019-11-09 13:48:36+00:00): Zdraivm, je tato oblast landuse=winter_sports este potrebna? Uz existuje presnejsia way 100250263 a okrem toho takato siroka oblast okolo Strbskeho Plesa aj kde su lesy a ziadne zimne sporty sa tam nerobia je asi prilis nahrubo.
wolfbert (2026-06-09 13:17:17+00:00): Lang, lang ist es her...

Was bedeutet rank?
cxs (2026-06-10 10:18:50+00:00): Der Key "rank" war ein Vorschlag zur Hierarchisierung von "place"-Tags 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:New_place_values
wolfbert (2026-06-10 17:22:46+00:00): Danke. Hat sich wohl nicht durchgesetzt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:23:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190917074/history has access:hgv = no that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/hgv/&***/access%3Ahgv/
ma-rt-in (2016-11-16 16:45:02+00:00): Hallo KK-O,
habe dein Kommentar in der Relation 948030 gelöscht, da ich finde das rcn für die Strecke ausreicht, mMn. ist ncn schon zuviel und lcn zu wenig. Gruß Martin
alex73 (2014-11-03 07:45:55+00:00): http://latlon.org/~alex73/pamylki.html#%27%D0%AD%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%87%D0%BD%D1%8B%20%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%BF%27%20%D0%BD%D1%8F%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B0%20%D1%9E%D1%82%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%BC%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%8C%20%D1%82%D1%8D%D0%B3%20%27railway%27
anderfo (2016-08-23 07:42:52+00:00): Hi, I've noticed that you've moved many of the roads and houses in the Harbak area, in order to match it with Bing satelite photos. The intention was probably good, but please note that Bing photos are usually offset with everything from 20 meters to several hundred meters! Thus, I would advice you to use Kartverket N50 data (which has been released) instead, in order to correct all the offsets. I started correcting some ways but the correction job takes plenty of time (longer than drawing them in the first place). So it would be better if I stopped the offsets from appearing (or re-appearing)...

It is possible to shift the Bing data so that the offset is removed for a small area, but sadly the offset is variable, for example it depends on the altitude. The satelite photos are not orthorectified.
Thus, if you remove the offset for one area, the data is completely offset in a different area. Here are some screenshots of similar trouble in Oppdal, although with smaller offsets: http://folk.ntnu.no/anderfo/files/temp/OSM/Bing/

In conclusion: Please stop using Bing as a data source, at least here in Norway, and use instead Kartverket N50 and/or Strava heatmap. If you wonder how to do that, have a look at this simple guide which I made a few weeks ago (in Norwegian): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking#Redigering_i_JOSM.2C_mini-guide

Please ask me if you need help! (and you may of course write in Norwegian if you prefer that; I don't know whether you're Norwegian or foreigner)

Best regards,
Anders Fougner
Trondheim, Norway
adamh (2015-09-25 04:22:04+00:00): What is the name source for these back alleys? As a resident in these streets for over 20 years I've never heard these names, nor seen on a sign or map. Thames St, Tyne St, Lyne St
Robert Whittaker (2017-01-03 11:25:37+00:00): Are you sure the postcode "BB12 9AW" that you added here is correct?

Code-Point Open has the centroid for this unit located on a different road 1.8km away at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.811503&mlon=-2.316621&zoom=16
mcld (2017-01-03 11:31:14+00:00): Hi Robert - I emailed you on 16th Nov 2016 about this. Please see that email for a bit more info and discuss further if needed
eggie (2022-11-06 21:38:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen...  Bij deze.. 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-12 04:41:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123184536 - is construction finished on this? It shows at least a footpath on bing imagery
Beager (2016-06-15 03:16:08+00:00): This small section of path (the way you've referred to) was gravel when last visited it.
I've ridden past it since, but wasn't looking if it's still gravel or not.

The path of Gardiner's Creek: Warrigal Rd - Burwood Hwy is complete and has been for a while.
gendy54 (2017-08-22 22:26:41+00:00): Bonjour,

Ca sous-entend quoi parc à animaux? Là où les chiens font leurs besoins?
JacquesL (2017-08-23 09:50:28+00:00): Non, c'était un enclos et une "cabane" avec des daims. Il faut que je repasse vérifier, mais il me semble que les animaux n'y sont plus. Auquel cas, on peut enlever la dénomination.
GerdP (2015-11-21 18:11:52+00:00): Hi there!
Please try to add the type of traffic_calming
on these nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1219868892
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9893262
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 15:33:43+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3503100 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3503098 ?
zstadler (2017-12-12 16:59:43+00:00): Hello yrtimiD,

In this edit you have created a "bridleway" road near כמון:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191293267
.
Is this a way intended for primary use by horse riders?
yrtimiD (2017-12-12 18:12:14+00:00): wow, 5 years ago... really can't say.
if unsure, just mark it as fixme or let's open a note...
zstadler (2017-12-15 07:46:22+00:00): I do not see that "fixme" notes have any impact. For example, there are many "temporary" highway=road tags with fixme notes that are stil open since 2009...
.
I prefer to make it a path since according to the sat imagery.
yrtimiD (2017-12-15 16:27:21+00:00): Go for it
zstadler (2017-12-16 21:57:16+00:00): Done
edvac (2015-03-05 18:18:45+00:00): Do you think it woud be convenient to add alt_name=Theater of Dreams ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
marc__marc (2021-04-24 18:10:33+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191510636
what's the meaning of layer=2 ? it's over somthing ?
Regards,
Marc
Warin61 (2017-10-16 01:47:34+00:00): Hi,
This changeset looks to have introduced the value 'airstrip'? LINZ defines these as runways. They do appear to be runways - well 4 out of 5 that I have looked at are .. the one missing is not there now, it is a watered field. 
Did you introduce this tag 'airstrip' .. or someone else? If it was you .. why not use 'runway' (or 'aerodrome' as it was before your changes)?
rcoup (2017-10-16 10:46:22+00:00): Hi Warin61,

Thought I'd submitted this, but either I didn't or it disappeared.

I think (it was a very long time ago), the existing tags caused the map to render with thousands of airplane icons at most zooms, and the renderer folks view was that it needed better tagging. In reality these airstrips are farm fields that are flat and are/have-been very rarely used to land a plane on for agricultural crop-dusting. 
I didn't unilaterally make a decision, it would have been discussed on https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis and we'd normally consult other OSM lists/etc regarding complicated tagging issues. I can't recall the details though.

IIRC any meaningful airfield (even the small grass strips) were tagged differently, but it's quite possible we missed something. There were runway & airport point layers from both Topo50 & Topo250. And it's quite possible LINZ has changed their data schema since then too.

Not sure if that helps or not?
eggie (2018-06-11 14:38:50+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. daarom.. opnieuw ..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
NiekvdMaas (2018-06-11 14:55:46+00:00): Thanks @eggie, heb m'n account inderdaad maar weer eens afgestoft.
frosm (2019-12-20 13:23:57+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78435957/history
vous souvenez-vous pourquoi vous avez ajouté une old_ref:sandre à cette route ?
Omegatherion (2018-01-14 11:13:21+00:00): Woher kommt die Bezeichnung und Nummerierung der Achsen?
Zartbitter (2018-01-14 11:19:31+00:00): Das stand so in schwarzer Schrift auf kleinen weißen Täfelchen am Straßenrand gleich bei den Abzweigungen.
j-wills (2016-01-16 10:25:38+00:00): Что за addr:street=микрорайон ИКЕА ?)))
CupIvan (2016-01-17 21:14:19+00:00): улица такая: http://index.kodifikant.ru/ru/5000003004800
GerdP (2015-11-28 10:57:34+00:00): Hallo!
Bitte mal anschauen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191690587
Geht  da wirklich ein Laufband vom Fußweg zur Straße ? 
Das wäre dann ein
highway=footway
conveying=*
Oder ist / war es ggf. ein Fließband, also ein 
man_made=goods_conveyor?
Auf den Satellitenbildern liegt es im Schatten.
GerdP (2015-12-10 17:41:07+00:00): Hi there!
Please can you explain what you wanted to map with this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191888547
Ticker Berkin (2020-09-13 09:33:57+00:00): I notice you've put closed ways tagged highway=unclassified, area=yes around junctions. This causes grief to routers that assume these highway/ways can be used. Why have you done this?
Mauls (2020-09-13 20:00:29+00:00): Because it maps the extent of the highway area. Valid tagging is not adjusted just because of errors in the programming of specific renders or routers.
Ticker Berkin (2020-09-14 14:33:23+00:00): I don't understand. With way 191942131 you created an arbitary closed way and then tagged it as if it was a minor public road (unclassified) and so routers should treat it as a valid road and are not in error if they do.
Mauls (2020-09-15 13:09:02+00:00): It is not "arbitrary", it is the extent of the highway area, and is correctly tagged as an area. It has linear ways through it for routing purposes.
Ticker Berkin (2020-09-15 13:41:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway states "area=yes on a highway=* describes a routable highway area on which the dedicated traffic can route omnidirectionally, i.e. from any point along the edge to any other. This is typical for pedestrian areas, or service areas where vehicles drive without prescribed lanes". 
Perhaps you are thinking of the proposed tag area:highway=...
eggie (2017-04-03 18:20:43+00:00): 
Weer gestart met osm ... dus...
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:54:37+00:00): Hi, I migrated the surface=red earth ways in this changeset to surface=laterite: red earth is the local English name for the same surface (Auroville/Tamil Nadu), and surface=laterite was approved as the canonical tag on 2026-06-15. Let me know if you think this doesn't apply here. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
Nakaner (2015-09-30 21:55:52+00:00): Möchtest du dich mal des Taggings dieses Nodes annehmen? Es ist dein Node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2026248168/history (missing country/operator prefix)
rurseekatze (2015-09-30 22:49:22+00:00): Das Tagging ist die eine Sache, der aktuelle Standort eine andere. Nachdem der Mittelbahnsteig durch zwei Außenbahnsteige ersetzt wurde, dürfte das Signal auch umgebaut oder versetzt worden sein. Ich muss das mal prüfen, wenn ich in der nächsten Zeit nochmal dort vorbeikomme.
Lachgast (2022-04-25 19:45:37+00:00): Nog altijd een prachtig kunstwerk! Inspiratie voor mijn huidige project nabij Utrecht.
josefabu2004 (2019-04-13 08:37:38+00:00): hurdnestrasse ist Hurden, nicht Freienbach
d1g (2017-03-21 03:48:22+00:00): За правки в сквере Дружбы тебе что волгодонцы сказали?
dr&mx (2017-03-21 08:37:06+00:00): ничего
d1g (2017-03-21 08:59:04+00:00): ... ничего потому что из проекта ушли авторы?!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Francyz/history
eggie (2023-10-05 08:59:23+00:00): Hoi Jarien,

Denk je dat dat incomplete stukje Groenroute weg kan? 
Het is hier nu rustgebied voor dieren heb ik me laten vertellen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3920623
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-05 11:31:29+00:00): Andere wandelroutes zijn al door Dick omgelegd.
Jarien (2023-10-05 14:23:50+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Weet niets over de actuele situatie in dat gebied.
Verander het naar jouw goeddunken.
Groeten
Jarien
eggie (2023-10-05 14:29:59+00:00): 👍
GUFSZ (2024-04-14 15:09:14+00:00): Du hast vor 11 Jahren diese Route "Keltenroute 1" genannt. Im Radroutenplaner wird sie mit einer zweiten Route "Keltenroute" genannt. In der jetzigen Beschilderung (bin die Route gestern abgefahren) wird sie auch nur noch Keltenroute genannt.
Ist dieser Name von dir? Wenn ja, was war die Überlegung dazu?
zstadler (2016-04-06 19:19:40+00:00): Can you please clarify why the 4 buildings were replaced by multipolygons?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-05 17:41:15+00:00): Hello! Sorry for bothering about this ancient edit but maybe you know this place...

Can you take a look at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4016234 ?

looks like it was supposed to be gate (and autocomplete failed) but maybe you meant something else
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-24 22:42:14+00:00): I don't think landuse=military is really the right land use for a civilian law enforcement training center.
FTA (2015-08-30 23:40:41+00:00): The future me would be inclined to agree with you and not the past me.
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-31 10:45:30+00:00): Not sure what the correct tag would be but I can think of a whole lot of wrong ones.
FTA (2015-09-01 04:05:10+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-March/072349.html talks about what the pipe dream would be for tagging.

I found a case of a police academy in England tagged as a college http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261883840

Maybe a protected area http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Social-protected-area

For now, I'll just remove the military tag from the ways.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-01 06:36:12+00:00): This might be a job for tagging@
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 20:22:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152762828 - at least section going through building can be deleted, right?
RussNelson (2025-12-03 20:33:58+00:00): Sure, and the building aligned, and parking lanes added to its parking lot. I see zero value in deleting things when there are so many things that remain to be added.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 20:36:04+00:00): no problem, I can do deletion myself

I was just asking is it as obvious as it seems (and in theory they could preserve tracks in basement or something)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 20:37:11+00:00): (especially as note reporter that raised this was kind of suspect at best and malicious troll at worst, and obviously someone with OSM experience - but as far as that section goes they seemed right about railway)
RussNelson (2025-12-03 20:40:39+00:00): I already marked it as razed. Yes, it is likely to be a malicious note. I expect it was CurlingMan13 since I noted that he deleted something crossing the thruway which I have seen every time I drive that section of the thruway. He deletes things and claims he can't see them even if they're plainly visible on aerials and clearly present on the ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 21:03:02+00:00): razed railways without traces or such section are ineligible for being mapped in OSM
RussNelson (2025-12-03 21:08:48+00:00): Many people disagree with that claim.
Marc_ch (2024-06-19 16:37:20+00:00): Bonjour Fred,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192203341
quel est la source du nom ?
dans GWR, il y a une route avec le nom Bi Chalet
Salutations,
Marc
efred (2024-06-21 11:00:35+00:00): Il y a déjà 11 ans lorsque j'ai tagué ceci. La partie la plus basse de cette rue s'appelle effectivement Tossenstrasse. Mais le reste?
Je vais vérifierai cela quand j'en aurai l'occasion. C'est fraiement possible que j'ai fait une erreur là.
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:54:57+00:00): Hi, I migrated the surface=red earth ways in this changeset to surface=laterite: red earth is the local English name for the same surface (Auroville/Tamil Nadu), and surface=laterite was approved as the canonical tag on 2026-06-15. Let me know if you think this doesn't apply here. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
capiscuas (2026-06-16 09:26:42+00:00): Awesome, thanks for ur contribution, i spent a fantastic 1 month in Auroville.
eggie (2020-09-17 06:37:58+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Polarbear (2017-09-15 22:40:55+00:00): Hi ulrichm, I have seen lots of objects in Tunesia that have the tag addr:continent=Africa, which is not part of the address scheme. 
addr:country ist the highest element.
It would be good if you could help checking the addresses and removing the tag in your area.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rKg
Polarbear (2017-09-29 19:09:50+00:00): Repaired.
ma-rt-in (2017-05-31 18:10:40+00:00): Hallo,

mir ist soeben aufgefallen das viele deiner Adresse falsch geschrieben sind. Dies nur als Hinweise, da ich dies gerade korrigiere.
eggie (2018-12-02 10:21:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit.. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mariotomo (2021-06-01 16:35:41+00:00): hi.  trying to understand why the Panamericana was marked width=25. did you with this changeset split a single way in two?  maybe not scaling down the width from the grand total of 25 to a more realistic 7 each?
mariotomo (2021-06-01 16:40:39+00:00): I reduced it, in changeset 105689054, if you would like to review?  thank you.
dmgroom_ct (2021-06-02 14:24:25+00:00): Thats seems OK to me
Taya_S (2023-08-20 20:30:53+00:00): reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140150799
Hind (2015-03-31 20:45:42+00:00): Здесь асфальт, oh, really?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192497604

Когда я там гулял, была обычная утоптанная тропа.
ad47 (2015-03-31 21:15:23+00:00): Если б я сам помнил, был ли 2 года назад асфальт в лесу под Балашихой. Но где-то точно был, раз отметил.