piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartler175 (2016-05-08 18:11:18+00:00): von OSM-Daten ein ausgereiften Editor wie z.B. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ und die regelmäßige Verwendung von Prüftools wie z.B. http://keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.65031&lon=12.52519&zoom=18&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C402
cra7337 (2016-05-11 08:06:14+00:00): Danke für die Erläuterungen. Ich werde dies in Zukunft korrekt handhaben.
Nakaner (2016-04-24 17:00:21+00:00): Da wir als Name nur Eigenname erfassen, erfassen die wir die Bussteignummern als local_ref=1 für den Bussteig usw. Das kann von Datennutzern (das sind Computerprogramme) verstanden und ausgewertet werden. Als Namen erfassen wir hingegen den Namen der Haltestelle. Ich habe das korrigiert.
Владимир К (2016-04-15 14:24:03+00:00): И крыши там нет?
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-15 20:16:43+00:00): Это место мне ещё править и править.
Нет, имеется некое подобие скелета . Может было что. Да и работает вроде бы только в летний сезон или закрылось. Не знаю, но как не пройду мимо, так закрыто.
Там есть маленький "огрызок" прям в углу, скоро нанесу.
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-15 20:44:04+00:00): Вот, Владимир, проверьте пожалуйста. Я не владею. 
http://rghost.ru/64HWDWglY (Действительно 5 дней)
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-15 20:47:55+00:00): Нарисовал, как есть. Осталось решить вопрос с валидатором, а в таком сплошном пересечении да и только - не могу пока ещё.
Владимир К (2016-04-16 10:25:17+00:00): че-то в файле совсем какая-то жуть
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-16 10:40:34+00:00): Ну разобрались? Там в углу "кусочек" одноэтажный. Метров 3-4 в высоту.
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-16 10:41:37+00:00): И поравил размеры соседнего магазина электроники. Их сохраните.
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-16 10:44:02+00:00): И, и =)
Там магазин через дорогу добавил. Не знаю как убрать лишний wood. Грубо говоря деревьев вокруг магазина уже нет, но начиная с левой части магазина уже посадили несколько в линию.
Владимир К (2016-04-16 10:52:48+00:00): короче как-то так. и стоит проверить название магазина, гугл дает название "молодежный"
Владимир К (2016-04-16 10:53:02+00:00): не магазина, кафе*
Владимир К (2016-04-16 10:54:50+00:00): а про деревья не понял. Разберитесь уже наконец с мультиполигонами и никаких проблем не будет
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-16 10:55:12+00:00): Именовал не Я. А когда был там, года два назад, то вывески не было.
Благодарю;)
Alecs01 (2016-04-15 17:01:10+00:00): grazie dell'aggiunta! un piccolo appunto, qui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.34869&mlon=9.32873#map=19/45.34869/9.32873 la ciclabile incrocia la ferrovia e vicino un'altra strada, ci sono dei ponti che ci passano sopra, come l'altra ferrovia poco più a sud? grazie
Nakaner (2016-04-24 16:57:57+00:00): korrigiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38838081 (name=Taxiparkplatz durch description=Taxiparkplatz ersetzt)
SomeoneElse (2016-04-18 14:38:45+00:00): Just checking - is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3430894262/history (a) still there and (b) in the right place?  Looking at it now I suspect that Brighthouse extends a bit further to the west.
GinaroZ (2016-04-18 15:36:38+00:00): This changeset is simply to correct the shop= tag - the nodes have not been surveyed.
SomeoneElse (2016-04-18 16:03:36+00:00): Ah, OK - I'll have to check myself.  By the way, it can be problematical "correcting" tags - when betting vs bookmaking was discussed on the talk-gb list at least one person sought to make a distinction between a bookmaker who sets his own odds and "runs his own book" and a shop manager who merely takes bets at odds dictated by head office and looks after a shopful of fixed-odds terminals.  It's not a problem here (I mapped these and didn't make that distinction), but if someone is using the "wrong" tag it's always worth mentioning the change; if you don't they'll use the "wrong" tag again.
Cheers,
Andy
trigpoint (2016-04-14 17:44:02+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit however are you sure they are all bookmakers? Did you visit them to check?
Ladbrookes operate casinos as well as bookmakers, therefore edits such as this require an on the ground survey.
Cheers Phil
GinaroZ (2016-04-14 21:47:50+00:00): Nope, haven't visited them, however Coral and Betfred are tag fixes (bookmakers).
Nakaner (2016-04-24 16:54:05+00:00): Auch hier gilt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name für die Fahrkartenautomaten. amenity=vending_machine + vending=public_transport_tickets zeichnet das Objekt schon als Fahrkartenautomaten aus. Ich habe das korrigiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38837986
luschi (2016-04-14 18:43:49+00:00): 1. Es ist unnötig Wohnmobilstellplatz zum name=... hinzuzufügen!
Das wird mit tourism=caravan_site beschrieben.
2. ist dieser Platz in Portugal und somit hat soll auch nur Portugiesisch in name=... verwendet werden.
lg
luschi (2016-04-14 18:45:56+00:00): fixed in: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38564505
b-holdet (2017-03-28 15:36:41+00:00): Hej Fod,

Jeg kan se at du har sat et område i Frederiksdal Skov til at hedde Frueskov.

Hvor har du den information fra?

Med venlig hilsen
Flemming
Nakaner (2016-04-24 16:44:01+00:00): Warum hast du in diesem Änderungssatz zwei Feldweg (highway=track) in Radwege (highway=cycleway) und einen Feldweg in einen Fußweg (highway=footway) umgetaggt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193210824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25767182

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369581043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369581039
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292326056


Sind die beiden erstgenannten Feldwege mit Verkehrszeichen Nr. 240 (http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240) beschildert?

Auch hier bitte ich dich um eine zeitnahe Antwort.
Sheldor der Ernste (2016-04-24 18:11:42+00:00): Hallo Nakaner, 
da ich in der Umgebung wohne und die entsprechenden Wege von vielen Leuten als Rad- bzw. Fußweg genutzt werden, änderte ich dies, da es noch kein anderer gemacht hat.
user_5359 (2016-04-15 16:11:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your added was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410316063, because the way overlaps with existing streets.
literan (2016-04-15 12:56:00+00:00): два альфа-банка уже тут
eugene-lisovskiy (2016-04-17 13:19:23+00:00): удалил
user_630853 (2016-04-15 09:09:03+00:00): addr:househumber має містити тільки числові значення
malenki (2016-04-14 18:54:21+00:00): Ferienwohnungen werden am besten als 
tourism=apartment
eingetragen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
Wenn du irgendwelche Fantasiewerte nimmst, macht das im Prinzip nichts – aber kaum jemand wird dieses Node als "Ferienwohnung" finden, weil eine Ferienwohnung in OSM eben nicht als "Holiday flat" kategorisiert wird.
naoliv (2016-04-29 21:34:00+00:00): O que você quis representar aqui, Edvando?
literan (2016-04-15 12:55:24+00:00): Прямо на тротуаре магазины расположены?
Nakaner (2016-04-15 17:49:59+00:00): Please do not add usage=* to crossover tracks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195504196
maraf24 (2016-04-14 20:51:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4121693925
Tag place ma ściśle określone wartości i na pewno nie ma wśród nich "Eko Energia Szczecin Sp. z o.o."
d3mol3k (2016-04-14 21:29:17+00:00): To co z tym fantem zrobić - tam gdzie jestnumer 4 Szklana - defacto jest numer 3. Wiem bo wożę tam pocztę. Jest tam biuro tej firmy. Cały teren to od torów do ogrodzenia jednostki wojskowej to skład węgla - taki duży ;). 
Jak to rozwiązać. Według map gis w Szczecinie tam nie ma numeru 3 jest tylko 4 :(
maraf24 (2016-04-14 21:34:24+00:00): Adres w terenie zawsze wygrywa.
Zmienić 4 na 3, a ten węzeł usunąć. Dodać odpowiednie note i source:addr=survey
d3mol3k (2016-04-14 21:36:16+00:00): OK jutro wieczorkiem naprawię - chyba ze chcesz mnie poprawić (a ja na przykładzie twojej poprawki zobaczę jak to jest opisane poprawnie) ;)
d3mol3k (2016-04-15 06:54:12+00:00): Nie wiem. Na razie zrobiłem to w ten sposób - budynek podzielony jest na 3 więc z jednego zrobiłem 3 i nazwę firmy. Tam gdzie  są jej biura.
Pontiac_CZ (2017-04-09 08:22:38+00:00): Mám pocit, že jako zdroj dat pro OSM by se mapy.cz neměly používat...
Pathetos (2017-04-10 14:25:53+00:00): Já mám spoustu pocitů. Pokud jsou na (relativně) aktuálních leteckejch snímkách lesní cesty, odpovídající i CUZK, pak nevidím důvod je nepoužít.
Pontiac_CZ (2017-04-10 14:59:29+00:00): Jo, to jo, jako potvrzení otevřeného zdroje, třeba CUZK, to tak děláme asi všichni :-), ale určitě mapy.cz neuváděj přímo mezi zdroji. Kdyby se toho domákli, tak jsou schopni dělat problémy. Zažili jsme to u prkotin, jako např. použití jejich map v neplaceném aDrake pro účely geocachingu.

Jinak to neber zle nebo dokonce osobně, já jen, že jsem si toho náhodou všiml. :-)

Příjemné mapování! 
Pavel
muralito (2016-11-09 14:50:12+00:00): Esta es footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78105398

No hay forma de pasar por ahi en auto.
AndersAndersson (2016-04-14 21:42:23+00:00): Är du säker på att Tranbärsvägen har access=no -> ingen får vara där, inte ens till fots eller på cykel?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25092215
Luxigurum (2016-04-17 21:27:10+00:00): Tranbärsvägen mellan Ljungvägen och Ekvägen är bussgata. Egenskaperna för den vägen fanns redan när jag lade till gångvägen i skogen. Att det skulle vara förbjudet att gå/cykla låter otroligt, men jag kan kolla upp det vid tillfälle.
Luxigurum (2016-04-21 11:43:03+00:00): Uppdaterat vägen, tillåter gång/cykel då inga förbudsskyltar finns.
AndersAndersson (2016-04-21 13:32:13+00:00): Kanon!
aceman444 (2016-04-14 21:09:44+00:00): Hi, why did you remove building=yes from the school C. Mátyás Alapiskola ? It is necessary there. You should have added amenity=school on the school grounds.
tffmh (2021-10-17 20:27:25+00:00): Guten Abend,
gerade durch Zufall drauf gestoßen, hast Du eine Quelle für die Benennung oder eine Erklärung?
Gruß,
Tim
Yendred (2021-10-17 21:04:02+00:00): 1. Vor Ort gewesen
2. siehe https://ratsinfo.muelheim-ruhr.de/buerger/to020.asp?TOLFDNR=71641
tffmh (2021-10-17 21:36:58+00:00): Super Danke! Zufällig eine Idee ob eine Straßenschlüssel vergeben wurde und welcher? Sonst frage ich bei der Stadt.
Yendred (2021-10-18 03:55:00+00:00): Leider nicht bekannt.
Yendred (2021-10-18 03:58:06+00:00): Wenn man sich nicht verschreibt ;.) erhält man aus ALKIS:
Flurstückskennzeichen:	
05309000400219______
Gemarkung:	Holthausen
Gemarkungskennzeichen:	053090
Flur:	004
Gemeinde:	Mülheim an der Ruhr
Gemeindekennzeichen:	05117000
Amtliche Fläche in m²:	106
Lagebezeichnung
(verschlüsselt):	Martha-Hadinsky-Weg
(0511700001108)
Tatsächliche Nutzung/m²:	Weg / 106
Aktualität des Flurstückes:	2020-11-24
tffmh (2021-10-18 07:59:35+00:00): Danke! Habe den Straßenschlüssel und eine Beschreibung angebracht.
"Die Bezirksvertretung 1 hat in ihrer Sitzung am 16.09.2013 beschlossen, den Weg in Martha-Hadinsky-Weg zu benennen. “Verfolgte des Nationalsozialismus - * 1911  † 1963” - Martha Hadinsky war nach dem 2. Weltkrieg Mitglied der in 1956 verbotenen KPD"
brogo (2016-04-14 19:26:26+00:00): 'comment' sollte sein: Neueröffnung Edeka
aceman444 (2016-04-14 21:13:03+00:00): Hi. If the name is "Trhovisko" (marketplace), why is it tagged shop=outdoor ? That is a totally different shop.
aceman444 (2016-04-14 21:14:07+00:00): Hi. "zmrzlina" means "ice cream". Why did you tag it shop=beverages?
aceman444 (2016-04-14 21:08:34+00:00): Hi. Thanks for adding objects in Dolny Stal, Slovakia. But please use Slovak or English comments on changesets when mapping in Slovakia. Nobody knows what "Zsuzsa1" means and you use it on 10 changesets.

Other errors in this changeset:
- on amenity=atm, use operator=* not name
- The townhall (Községi hivatal) was already mapped on the building. Why did you add it again as a node?
jmw751 (2016-04-14 20:03:12+00:00): Errors between area shown on previous edit and developers estate layout / planning consent - to be reviewed by contributer May 2016
aceman444 (2016-04-14 21:15:33+00:00): Hi. What does "Jazdectvo" mean? Surely it is not a tourism=attraction. Did you mean some track for equestrian/horse sport?
maraf24 (2016-04-15 10:51:09+00:00): Widać tutaj błąd w edytorze iD - ustawienie stacji paliw powoduje usunięcie informacji o budynku.
Poza tym było to o jedną stację i jeden adres za dużo:)
Robin007 (2016-04-15 12:53:56+00:00): Tak, musi być jakiś błąd w edytorze.
Stacja była jako budynek. A powinno być jako stacja paliw.
MikeN (2017-01-15 03:48:20+00:00): Hi, has this section of railroad out to San Jon been rebuilt now?   It had previously been abandoned.   Thanks,
Ronny Standtke (2017-08-31 20:23:03+00:00): Da ist dir der Punkt 3894908266 aber gehörig verrutscht. Kannst du das wieder korrigieren?
mavl (2016-04-15 19:00:03+00:00): Hello. Please, give me one good reason why two roads are connected?
DannyAiquipa (2016-04-15 19:31:12+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, I think these ways should be interesected so i did it , but I've already reverted this changeset , more details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38600444
mavl (2016-04-15 19:48:25+00:00): Thank you for revert. 
  
These two roads have no common points. The first road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26723955] is on the ground. The second road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376193872] is on an embankment (there is a bridge). The embankment has height about 4 meters. A person can rise on an embankment. An automobile can't.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-16 20:13:50+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure about http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410362584 ?  It seems to run through a bunch of buildings according to the Bing imagery.  Is that out of date compared to Digitalglobe?
woodpeck (2016-04-14 22:15:40+00:00): It is still not entirely clear to me what happened here. A larger number of roads seem to have been accidentally deleted by various users, among them Maissara youssouf, ali said, and zainaba med, in the course of tracing buildings. I commented on some of the problematic changesets. Since there have been some isolated and incomplete attempts at repairing the damage by others, we may now have a situation where some objects are duplicated, and manual checking is required.
Grillo (2016-04-22 14:06:47+00:00): I tried to do some cleanup (mainly JOSM validator corrections) but there's so much data that doesn't make sense so it's hard to know which is correct and which is bogus and should be deleted.

Most area=yes are probably building=yes but almost all of them need to be adjusted...
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:03:47+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
chillly (2016-04-16 13:46:50+00:00): This edit, even though it is small, has changed the character of the junction, making it incorrect. I will revert this edit.

Please stop making remote armchair edits like this. Is your motivation to increase your edit count? Do you get paid per edit?  

I feel it would be better to add a note asking a local mapper to survey the site.
calfarome (2016-04-17 01:11:26+00:00): Hello Chilly
This edition has already been reverted.
All my edits are  right for validator , however your observation is also valid, Thanks for the feedback.
user_5359 (2016-04-15 18:07:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark buildings only as landuse=residential. Use building=yes.

And please: discuss the reported problems with the other guys of the group GEO100 Dr. Mueller's class!
q_un_go (2016-04-15 07:46:49+00:00): Amtlich heißt das Gewässer noch immer Rimsinger Baggersee, auch wenn es sich seit einigen Jahren in die Gündlinger Gemarkung frisst.
santamariense (2016-10-03 14:23:42+00:00): E aí blza? Em uma ida a campo em 18/11/2015 anotei em audiodescrição "Delegacia de Transito", que foi o que eu li na frente do prédio. Será que mudou o tipo de delegacia, ou será que funciona no local os dois tipos?
BCNorwich (2016-04-15 06:08:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice the gate you added is not attached to or part of the footway. Nor is it placed as a barrier to Spa Fields. As such it serves no real purpose in the database and will be ignored by routeing software. I see also you intended to show an access condition on the gate,(locked at night), this can be expressed with the tag "access:conditional@destination=sunrise-sunset"

Are you sure this is the correct position of the gate? If you need assistance please ask.
lionandoil (2016-04-15 10:05:41+00:00): Apologies, my intention was actually to add the gate to the existing node between the highway and footpath (18672679), not create a new node. iD kind of suggested to me that that's what I'd done, but I suppose I'll give it another go with Potlatch. Thanks for flagging it up! (also not 100% sure what the gate time restrictions are, so leaving it off the tag for now)
BCNorwich (2016-04-15 11:17:34+00:00): Gate is now properly connected to the highway, thanks, well done.
hee243898 (2022-07-12 11:39:43+00:00): Does this still exist? No information can be found
user_5359 (2016-04-15 18:37:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your building is a double entry to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55316481 -
Commodoortje (2016-04-15 17:01:15+00:00): Hoi Mohammed, het is niet gebruikelijk om in Nederland de name tag in Arabisch schrift te noteren.

Als ik het door google translate haal is de vertaling:  سوبر ماركت =supermarkt
Als de vertaling Gamma zou zijn, zou je kunnen overwegen om deze als 
name:ar= سوبر ماركت  toe te voegen als arabische naam. Bij een moskee zou ik een voorstelling kunnen maken, bij de Gamma niet.
Commodoortje (2016-04-15 17:03:09+00:00): Ik zie dat je vermoedelijk via maps.me de node hebt aangepast. Dan wordt het toevoegen van voorgaande moeilijker
utack (2016-04-15 00:41:13+00:00): Hi, what is "wrong place" supposed to mean? Does this need to be deleted, or moved?
Sirirat Tantivachiratrakrun (2016-04-15 02:55:30+00:00): I want to move it because that isn't hotel
utack (2016-04-15 09:57:09+00:00): No problem.
You can either go to www.openstreetmap.org and use the "Edit" button, or you can describe what it actually is and where it is located and I can move it for you
utack (2016-04-18 00:09:14+00:00): Could you please tell us what to do here? A hotel with the name "wrong place" is not a good solution
Nakaner (2016-04-15 17:03:22+00:00): Deine Änderungen sehen irgendwie komisch/kaputt aus. Seit wann fährt die RegioTram von Korbach nach Hamburg? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1721029 (v35)
adjuva (2016-04-16 06:12:01+00:00): Meine Änderungen sind vollkommen ok - ich habe nur Lücken in Relationen gefüllt. Allerdings ist mir dabei aufgefallen, dass ich ständig die gleichen Lücken fülle (schau mal in die Relationen 1788865, 5149131, 3310117 oder 2178679 - die sind absolut identisch zu Deiner Relation). Schuld scheint der Changeset 37939761 zu sein. Acht dort zerstöre Relationen habe ich schon am Mittwoch korrigiert (Changeset 38513957) - die andern fünf habe ich mir für heute vorgenommen.
mapper999 (2016-09-03 17:15:51+00:00): Und was ist eigentlich mit diesem Schienenstück passiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133733282
Kann man das löschen oder fehlt es irgendwo?
Chris Fleming (2016-04-17 11:14:49+00:00): Hi again, I can't see the purpose of the area added?
user_5359 (2016-04-15 18:58:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice that Church isn't the name, it is a description! And please add the key religion http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion and denomination http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination.
user_5359 (2016-04-15 19:01:48+00:00): Welcome again to OSM! An again: Please describe the way and don't give trivial name. Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334706390 ?
5m4u9 (2016-04-15 06:20:35+00:00): thanks for your edits!

In this map there are names by country/culture. In this, you must be use name in spanish and name:jp=ヘネシ旅行社 and so.
Chris Fleming (2016-04-17 10:55:32+00:00): Looks like accidental drags. Edinburgh has been fixed in #38632288 but Glagow changes still need reverting.
Chris Fleming (2016-04-17 11:13:22+00:00): Undid the remaining changes in 38640356. It looks like you aciddentlally moved some nodes easy to do! 

Also I couldn't see the purpose of the area. So have removed ut.

Let me know if you have any questions on using OpenStreetMap!
GerdP (2018-11-02 13:22:51+00:00): Hi! 
I just stumbled over this natural=water https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410411380
You used landsat as source, Bing and others show the coastline at a very different position. Do you think landsat is up to date?
Vort (2018-11-02 13:36:38+00:00): Hello.
Bing imagery is inaccurately photoshopped.
Look at lakes - they are disappearing to nowhere.
And such smooth ocean color is also unreal.
You can see lake #410411380 at Google maps.
GerdP (2018-11-02 13:44:35+00:00): Google Maps is not a source we can use.
Vort (2018-11-02 13:47:54+00:00): I know. But just _looking_ at it is not prohibited.
Landsat images requires non-trivial processing to become usable.
I can help with it if needed.
GerdP (2018-11-02 13:52:42+00:00): Thanks, I am concentrating on errors in the coastline, just wondered why it is so difficult to the sat images in this areas.
I guess correcting would require some knowledge about tidal changes etc, so nothing I want to do.
Vort (2018-11-02 13:55:29+00:00): Low population -> low interest. Also most time of the year these lakes are covered with ice and snow.
Warin61 (2018-10-11 00:58:14+00:00): Hi,
On ways 410478440, 411483863, 411454355, 411444715 and way 410476931 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed them, but I think they should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
mavl (2019-01-08 16:56:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:56:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jakecopp (2024-01-23 06:46:34+00:00): Hi Samuel, regarding this info on the source:bicycle tag of one of the ways:

> if they're City of Sydney Parks, all City of Sydney parks are bicycle=yes unless otherwise noted by the council in signage.

Do you know if this is still current, and if you have a source for it? Thanks.
samuelrussell (2024-01-23 21:06:28+00:00): I’m mobile right now. I will attend to this change set within 48 hours.
samuelrussell (2024-01-25 04:30:02+00:00): I can't find the CoS announcement or on their website, but CoS park steele habitually note bicycle=yes as "non-road related area" bicycle access in the controlled space.
aharvey (2020-07-24 06:17:48+00:00): Hey mate, verifiability is an important concept for OSM as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability. Part of this means that subjective opinions are best not mapped and instead we stick to objective truths we can verify on the ground. bicycle=stupid sound quite subjective and it's going to work out better to tag things like maxspeed, shoulder, lanes etc which bicycle routers can use to assess routes for different types of cyclists. I'
aharvey (2020-07-24 06:18:32+00:00): I'll update these to bicycle=yes since bicycles are permitted here due to the lack of any bicycle=no signage and bicycles permitted on any road unless signed otherwise.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:56:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aceman444 (2016-04-18 19:04:54+00:00): Dakujem za opravu niektorych tych chyb :)
Thanks for fixing some of the stuff I sent you.
literan (2016-04-15 12:50:42+00:00): highway=pedestrian это пешеходные улицы, как Арбат или Камергерский. Прошу вас не вносить ложные теги. То, что уже сделано, будет исправлено.