piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gnlpfth (2016-07-18 10:48:21+00:00): Hallo,
was hat es denn mit dem access=no auf sich? Ist die A98 zwei Monate lang gesperrt (gewesen)?
Gruß,
FM
mueschel (2016-05-25 17:50:47+00:00): Wer sagt, dass diese Straße kein Feldweg ist? Warst du vor Ort?
Bob_Becks (2016-05-25 20:37:32+00:00): Ja, ich fahre fast täglich diese Strasse.
mueschel (2016-05-25 20:42:55+00:00): Dann ist gut, ich war schon länger nicht mehr da und dachte dass jaybe Recht hat und die Verbindung gesperrt wurde nachdem die neue Strecke frei ist.
jlcod (2016-05-06 21:42:44+00:00): Hello and sorry to disturb you again, but I think highway=services is probably not what you wanted to use here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
For detailed street mapping, you can use this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area

Also I wanted to remind you that OSM is a community project and it is problematic if someone does not react to changeset comments at all.
Rezequiel (2016-05-06 21:58:35+00:00): Which node you erase it? 
Please let me be the one (along side with my co-workers) who mapping that part of the Earth in particular. We have a schedule to follow and also we have Cadastre data to support our mapping. Thank you for the reading.
AgusQui (2016-05-07 02:58:35+00:00): Creo que borró un nodo que estaba duplicado.
dbusse (2016-05-07 04:02:16+00:00): There were Bugs in the map.
And in that place are a few remaining Bugs left like self intersecting ways, crossing lines and so on. Are you going to fix these?
Rezequiel (2016-05-07 04:10:17+00:00): That's strange, I always fix bugs before upload changes (JOSM complains about it, so I fix it).
Yes please, let me the task to and my co-workers. 
I will re-check again in the incoming days.
And, many thanks for those bugs.
Regards.
kayle (2016-05-09 06:40:37+00:00): Vitaj v OSM. To je nejaká súkromná chata, alebo je to možné prenajať? Pýtam sa preto, ze to obsahuje v názve čosi, čo  vyzerá ako meno osoby.
Ďalej čo znamená  "chata_2168"? Je to ako hodnota pri tagu building, čo je dosť neštandardné.
Ďakujem
rab (2016-05-06 20:55:51+00:00): Hi,
Mapbox has updated their imagery for Harare. It is much more recent than bing now
YalCat (2016-05-06 21:39:17+00:00): Thanks -- just went back and updated. You're right -- big difference -- I'll make sure to use it from now on
Self-Perfection (2016-05-08 14:31:26+00:00): Привет.

Внесение адресов на POI - спорная тема: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=26457 Многие (я в том числе), считают это нецелесообразным и скорее вредным. В нормализованной базе данных одна и та же информация не должна храниться в нескольких местах, адрес POI итак определяется по контуру здания, в котором оно расположено. Но я встречал мнения, что почтовый адрес организации может отличаться от адреса здания, или включать дополнительные элементы (номер кабинета).

Если адрес вы берёте с таблички на здании, то чисто семантически это свойство здания, а не расположенной в нём организации.
Geogast (2016-05-06 20:34:33+00:00): mit Hilfe von Mapillary
2maxic (2016-05-15 18:22:04+00:00): Вы собираетесь подчищать свои правки, исправляя чужие косяки?????
http://wowik.000space.com/routes/ru-sve/2.htm
Polarbear (2016-05-13 17:51:26+00:00): Hallo Christoph, ist das Jugendheim http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245787005 eine Freizeit- oder eine Wohneinrichtung?
-Christoph- (2016-05-25 07:15:41+00:00): Hallo Polarbear,
bei dem Jugendheim EVAN handelt es sich um eine Freizeiteinrichtung. Siehe auch: http://www.evankirche-xanten.de/index.php/einrichtungen/jugendheim

Gruß -Christoph-
MKnight (2016-05-06 23:44:22+00:00): привет ximeg на ОСМ
where did you get the informations about closing?
cannot find something about on the website.
malenki (2016-05-07 11:35:10+00:00): Regarding the website the shop still exists.
ximeg (2016-05-08 08:21:06+00:00): Hi there,
I live close to it. Today I went there and checked one more time to be sure. BüroDepot isn't there, and in the room it used to be there is another shop, called "Fair Fight". It also has address Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 12 listed on their webpage fair-fight.de. I'll add it to the map instead of BüroDepot.
canfe (2023-04-02 07:25:26+00:00): Non penso che lo stagno si chiami "zona umida" quella è una descrizione già contenuta nel tag.
Parimenti gli altri due laghetti hanno davvero quel nome?
C'è una fonte che dichiari quel nome?
Viking81 (2023-04-04 06:47:03+00:00): Sono passati alcuni anni, ma se ho messo i nomi propri in name, con tanto di maiuscole, sicuramente li ho letti su un cartello in loco.
Se qualcuno è del posto, può verificare se i cartelli ci sono ancora e/o hanno cambiato denominazione ai laghetti.
canfe (2023-04-10 08:46:52+00:00): Ho lasciato una nota per la verifica.
Sul sito del Comune non riporta alcun nome.
eggie (2022-01-14 07:44:04+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-07 06:26:30+00:00): Hej
1. Prosiłbym o dodawanie bardziej wyczerpujących opisów zmian.
2. W miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic stosujemy tag addr:place= zamiast addr:city=
3. Zaimportowałem adresy w gminie Lubawa.
Pozdrawiam
Protoxenus (2018-06-21 15:02:54+00:00): Hi, 
you added a lot of ways in Hurghada. Much work. But you added ways as residential, wich are only paths. Other people have to revise your work to continue the data bench correctly. Before you continue your work I strongly recommend to take a look at the wiki.openstreetmap.org and map accordingly to the rules.
Regards Protoxenus
Supaplex (2016-05-07 03:43:31+00:00): 這一站真的有改名嗎?
Supaplex (2016-05-07 03:42:12+00:00): 可以把名稱加進去啊
Minh Nguyen (2016-09-19 07:37:45+00:00): Tôi đã lùi lại bộ thay đổi này: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42263114>.
habi (2019-03-04 08:20:33+00:00): The mini-railway *is* electrified, but has also a coal-steam-powerded engine sometimes. Would you mind if I change the tag?
Nzara (2019-03-07 12:01:36+00:00): As far as I remember, the electric locomotives are powered by batteries. The tracks do not have any electrical components. If you have better information, please let me know the details. I will be happy to change the tagging according to the facts.

Regards
habi (2019-03-07 13:06:14+00:00): You're absolutely right, I misunderstood the tag until I read the wiki entry. The tags are correct, let's keep the other discussion in the other changeset :)
Mike Baggaley (2016-05-09 19:55:34+00:00): Hi, ER6 is not the name of a highway. I have assumed this is the local reference for a footpath, so have moved it to the loc_ref field.
BCNorwich (2016-05-10 05:52:32+00:00): Hi, my main concern here was that a new highway (that footpath) was placed atop an existing one which was wrongly tagged as highway=service. I corrected this.

I do notice that relatively new mapper joejwall has added numerous way names in this manner, also naming paths and tracks as name=Path and name=Track. Then it seems sometimes not properly joining ways where they meet.
I am not local so don't have enough first hand info to make corrections. Perhaps if you are local you could tidy up the area.

Regards
Self-Perfection (2016-05-08 14:40:57+00:00): Привет. source лучше всё-таки указывать в стандартизированном виде. В данном случае это survey. А ещё про этажность http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building:levels >"Для здания указывается число этажей, максимальное для всех частей здания."
Alecs01 (2016-05-07 15:04:44+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Un appunto: le strade hanno un nome, non un indirizzo, le varie chiavi addr: non vanno messe sulle strade. Ciao, buon mapping! Alessandro
Nakaner (2016-05-12 20:37:23+00:00): My comment from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39276641 also applies here. Please remove the sidewalks which you have mapped as separate ways although there is no physical separation apart from a kerbstone or parking slots.

This comment also applies on other changesets you have uploaded.
MKnight (2016-05-07 11:41:12+00:00): Moin,

wenn du doppelte Objekte löschst, dann achte doch bitte darauf, die Tags vorher zu vereinen.

Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39161933
MosKartograf (2016-08-03 10:41:54+00:00): Прошу пояснить, почему выход из пластикового каптажа излишне тегировать? См. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dspring
chazzky (2016-08-03 11:05:10+00:00): Потому что когда я там был последний раз, там были обычные дренажные каналы для стока ливневой воды, а не пластиковый каптаж. Нет, конечно что-то могло измениться, но почему-то не верится. На днях могу заскочить посмотреть.
MosKartograf (2016-08-03 12:36:25+00:00): Уж осмотрите, пожалуйста, выходы природных вод из пластмассовых труб у самого берега ниже уровня дренажного стока.
MosKartograf (2016-08-09 11:50:39+00:00): Как результат? На будущее лучше удалять только явные легко подтверждаемые фальсификации. Сомнительное стоит удалять только после объективного осмотра, потому что от удаления существующего, расцененного как сомнительное страдает качество карты.
chazzky (2016-08-09 12:50:54+00:00): До Царицыно так и не дошел, и похоже дойду не раньше следующей недели. Пока закрою пакет правок, если что создам заново.
chazzky (2016-08-11 08:13:56+00:00): добавил nftural=spring в пакете https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41383357
MosKartograf (2016-08-12 10:04:21+00:00): Спасибо за проверку!
literan (2016-05-09 22:15:49+00:00): обратите внимание, какие теги мне пришлось подправить: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=39202791
maxerickson (2016-11-02 21:37:10+00:00): I haven't done anything to figure out what would cause it, but 15-20 objects in this area have tags with U+007F added to them, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12786669 . I haven't checked that they were all part of this changeset, but they are from changesets you had made.

I have cleaned up the ones that I happened to download, except for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416332289 

The character doesn't show up in the left panel, but it does show up in the page title (just before the name). It also shows up in josm and can be searched for there.

I don't think they cause any big problems (I guess stuff ignores them), but it would be good to avoid creating them if you can figure out where they were coming from.
emergency99 (2016-05-07 12:35:06+00:00): Das "Ein und Ausstieg" gehört nicht in den Namen. Und beim Mappen von Bus stationen bitte immer ans public transport v2 schema halten. Ich werde den Fehler korrigieren.
BeKri (2016-05-07 12:31:57+00:00): Servus uboot,
habe mitbekommen, das Du bei dem Changeset power=substation nach transformer umgetaggt hast.
Das halte ich nicht für richtig siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Power_networks
transformer ist der Trafo allein,
als substation dann zusammen mit Schalter/ Trenner/ Leistungsschalter etc.
(zumindest tagt der Rest der Welt sowas als substation)
Lg derBeKri
d1g (2016-05-07 09:41:31+00:00): Обсуждение - http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=591629#p591629
majkaz (2016-12-15 13:14:29+00:00): Could you please check and correct these edits? Some of it if not all seems completely off.
vasony (2016-07-13 11:02:14+00:00): Szia! Kesztölci felmérésen felvitted a házszámokat a Klastrom utcában, viszont az utcanév viszont Széchenyi István.Lehet ezt javítani Kalstromra ahogy az épületekből következik?
ImreSamu (2016-07-14 15:25:18+00:00): Köszi az észrevételt!  
Szerintem is  át lehet javítani Klastrom-ra!
Te-Ika (2018-09-26 18:37:48+00:00): Hey Chachafish,

Could take a look at this area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416358766
According to imagery taken around a month ago it would appear this parking lot has been built on to become an apartment building. If you could confirm that we can go ahead and make the necessary changes.

Thanks!
Te-Ika
chachafish (2018-09-26 18:47:36+00:00): Wow, good catch! I didn't know about this gem. You're right. It looks like a bunch of apartments now ;)
Te-Ika (2018-09-26 18:50:10+00:00): Just wanted to confirm. Thanks for getting back on this so fast!
Marych_ (2016-05-07 11:42:16+00:00): Евгений
удалять не надо
Есть специальные теги, которые позволят указать что тут была трамвайная линия.

Я ваш пакет отверну назад
Marych_ (2016-05-07 11:47:13+00:00): PS
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Garpul
сейчас активно это все актуализирует

Лучше наносите новое

У нас проблема с адресами
куча домов с номером но без улицы
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-10 13:36:42+00:00): Hey @Kostik, Can you please tell what are all the deletions that you done in this changeset. Your comment says you've fixed some duplicate nodes but I see ways are also deleted. Please feel free comment on this changeset.  
http://osmcha-django-staging.tilestream.net/39162224/
rene78 (2016-05-10 07:42:08+00:00): Are you sure about the "Long distance bus station"? Seems to be the 2nd one in Jerantut.
bretonsuisse (2016-05-10 08:15:32+00:00): Yes,
I took the bus last month to reach Kuantan on the east coast after a short stay in hospital.
this station seems to be the new long-distance bus station.
Scuola Leonardo da Vinci (2019-08-26 09:06:06+00:00): This school has moved in January 2019 here:
Corso di Porta Vigentina, 35 - 20122 Milano
It should be moved correctly on the map!
Thanks
Pierce (2019-01-07 11:10:30+00:00): Hey there,
Just some advice for marking up locations like you have for HEMCO Industries, you've effectively created multiples of the same place, when in fact that all four buildings equate to the one location.

Next time you come across something like this again, just make the areas for each of the buildings, but do not mark them up as buildings, instead add a multipolygon relation and then with that relation assign all the details you would normally to the individual buildings.

I've gone ahead and fixed this for you if you wanna take a look on how it should be done.

Again, if you have any queries, let me know. But the first point of reference would be the wiki or the help site, failing that reddit or any number of chatrooms that are set up.

Remember, it never hurts to double check on how you should go about doing something if you're unsure.
muralito (2016-05-07 21:07:40+00:00): ¿Te parece que Punta Cable es office=telecomunication?
Richard (2016-06-12 18:36:15+00:00): I think there's an issue with having this as an otherwise untagged multipolygon. "Old-style multipolygons" (tags on the ways, not on the relation itself) are still common in OSM. Given the lack of substantive tags on the relation, this could potentially be interpreted as an old-style multipolygon, leading to a grand kerfuffle with a road following the outline of the park - indeed osm2pgsql will do that under certain circumstances.

Since this relation appears to exist for archiving purposes only, could I suggest either deleting it, or tagging it as something not a multipolygon? (Perhaps type=collection)
Richard (2016-06-12 18:37:12+00:00): (By "this", I mean relation 6196005 of course - I should have made that clear!)
Colin Smale (2016-06-12 19:00:27+00:00): Richard, you are right. As I mentioned in the note on that relation it was only intended as a temporary container while i sorted out the boundary. I will remove 6196005.
Richard (2016-06-12 19:48:49+00:00): Thanks!
t_ja (2016-05-07 16:44:37+00:00): Ahoj, z akeho dovodu bola pretagovana zeleznica z preserved na narrow_gauge? Podla wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dpreserved) je to jednoznacne preserved (historicka zeleznica, sluzi na turisticke ucely, ziadna pravidelna preprava osob). A preco su otagovane nazvom aj vlecky (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183885382), to nestaci dat nazov na hlavnu trasu? A na ten masaker v stanici Tanecnik (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183885369) naozaj nemam slov :( To je take tazke si pred nahratim dat do OSM skontrolovat, ci nedoslo k neumyselnemu vandalizmu, ako napr. "zarovnanie bodov na priamku"? 
Poprosim opravit co najskor, lebo tento changeset je jasnym kandidatom na revert.
Durko_freemap (2016-05-08 09:21:30+00:00): hm, Tibor myslim, ze toto nema zmysel opravovat, tie cesty su v Tanecniku nezmyselne krizom-krazom cez budovy, som jednoznacne za revert. Durko
t_ja (2016-05-08 19:47:25+00:00): Nakolko dane useky zeleznice su uz pomenovane viac ako tri roky v relaciach http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2417421 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2448612 , je tento changeset uplne zbytocny. Revertol som ho v changesete #39188113.
Durko_freemap (2016-05-09 07:00:53+00:00): super, pekne je upratany aj Tanecnik, tak ako ma byt, dokreslim este schody a POI, vdaka Tibor
chnav (2016-05-18 06:50:06+00:00): восстановил удаленные проезды во дворе Сандригайло-58
user_5359 (2016-05-09 19:12:10+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please add the address, which you mention on your changeset comment.
kayle (2016-05-09 06:42:13+00:00): Vitaj v OSM. Môžem vedieť prečo si pridala reštauráciu, ktorá už je 3 roky zaznačená? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2277126129
Ďakujem
kayle (2016-05-09 06:43:18+00:00): Upps.. pardón, zle som sa pozrel, boli pridané iba nejaké nové tagy. MOja chyba :(
chnav (2017-06-03 06:17:31+00:00): You should move old numbering to backup tag old_ref=M-39

Please discuss with local mappers before changing.
chnav (2017-06-03 06:46:21+00:00): I have fixed that.
SiHollett (2017-06-03 09:22:26+00:00): Thanks chnav for fixing.

I didn't think there were local mappers - they had left it wrong for years. And how long would I have had to have waited for a response for local mappers to respond had I discussed with them? I mean, these vestigial labels are something you feel strongly about to complain to me before fixing, rather than just fixing, but it took you more than a year to respond!

You're welcome, by the way, for the hours I spent dealing with the issue.
chnav (2017-06-03 09:47:07+00:00): Sorry if I offend you, and thanks for you effort.
SiHollett (2017-06-03 10:11:26+00:00): No problem chnav. You didn't offend me, just brought out my anti-bureaucracy streak.

And I'm also projecting a nasty incident with a gang of UK mappers onto you, which is totally unfair as you have been nothing but courteous and changed the map to how you wanted it rather than demanding that I do it.
EneaSuper (2016-05-08 07:37:53+00:00): Il Museo Diocesano è già stato mappato, quello che hai aggiunto tu è errato:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5648754
wkdgs (2022-07-07 08:53:47+00:00): Hi,

ich hab die von dir hinzugefügten Baumreihen (natural=tree_row) wieder entfernt.

Es sind ja bereits alle einzelnen Bäume gemappt und die Baumreihe gibt  keine zusätzlichen Informationen. Eine Baumreihe ist mMn eher dafür da, wenn man nicht jeden Baum mappen möchte oder kann.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/39165546
Cassini97 (2022-07-07 09:17:18+00:00): Salve!
Man fragt vorher!

Aber wenn Du schon dabei bist... am Main gibt es eine Row die darfste auch revidieren.

Den Rest schlucke ich jetzt runter... Wichtigtuer!

Gruß
wkdgs (2022-07-07 09:50:39+00:00): Entschuldige bitte den unfreundlichen Ton der Nachricht. Das war nicht beabsichtigt.

Ich wollte nur kurz Bescheid geben, dass ich etwas von dir geändert habe und warum.
Cassini97 (2022-07-07 09:55:57+00:00): Ich entschuldige nicht!

Du darfst Deine Revision jetzt wieder rückgängig machen... und wenn ich Zeit habe schaue ich mir das vielleicht mal an.

Ich mach mir doch nicht die stundenlange Arbeit für einen hohlen Zahn.

Gruß
wkdgs (2022-07-07 10:39:46+00:00): Warum soll ich die Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen?
Cassini97 (2022-07-07 19:42:49+00:00): Du hast es tatsächlich nicht kapiert!
highflyer74 (2022-07-07 20:56:42+00:00): Und alle mal tief durchatmen und etwas freundlicher miteinander sein... Danach fühlt man sich gleich viel besser :-)
Richard (2016-05-07 23:50:09+00:00): Hi!

Please don't add names like "NCN 7" to paths. In OpenStreetMap we record that a path is part of NCN route 7 by making it part of a "route relation". This shows up on the OpenCycleMap layer and other bike-specific cartography.

Adding it to the name as well is duplicate information and makes it difficult for cycle routers and renderers to show the correct name.

Thanks!

Richard
(cycle.travel and Sustrans ranger)
johnny_1982 (2018-01-09 21:01:26+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz fügt zu Litfaßsäulen ein "amenity=advertising" hinzu. Das Amenity wird von Osmose bemängelt (ok, ist nicht die ultimative Wahrheit) und ist im Wiki seit April 2016 als deprecated markiert, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=advertising?uselang=de

Gibt es einen Grund, dass man amenity braucht?
(Ein Teil habe ich bereits rückgängig gemacht.)
Noen (2016-05-10 20:03:03+00:00): Hi!
Write the name of the waterfall in the name field, don't try to describe the feature.
cronoser (2016-05-13 16:59:53+00:00): Hola;
Veo que has estado tocando la tipología de ciertas calles de Burgos, en algunas coincido contigo de que deben ser de otro tipo, pero por ejemplo la Avenida de Villalonquejar considero que debería tener mas importancia que una tertiary tal y como está indicada ahora.
Un saludo
migonso (2016-05-13 18:56:20+00:00): Hola, Cronoser:

Sí, modifiqué el orden del viario de Burgos para jerarquizarlo un poco porque creo que se encontraba muy desordenado. Los criterios con los que actué fueron morfotipológicos, procurando conseguir una imagen de la ciudad más ordenada (cinturones, radiales, ejes históricos, etc.) y no tan centrada en la cantidad de tráfico que absorbe cada vía (que también). La avenida de Villalonquéjar que comentas la puse en tertiary por eso mismo: porque no se trata de una carretera radial más allá del propio Villalonquéjar y la parte este de su polígono industrial. Sería de la misma categoría que las carreteras comarcales (en interurbano) o una calle importante por tráfico o por tamaño pero no un eje viario (en urbano). En este caso el eje urbano sería la N-120, al otro lado del río.

Espero haber argumentado bien los cambios. Si no, modifícalo como lo creas conveniente. Gracias por el comentario :)
danidoedel (2016-05-07 18:04:06+00:00): Es ist unnötig, bereits vorhandene und korrekte Nodes zu entfernen und die Gebäude mit den entsprechenden Werten zu taggen.
Vor allem, wenn das üblichere System die "Node-Variante" ist.
Tordanik (2016-05-07 19:27:38+00:00): Ich hätte das nicht geändert, wenn ich nicht ohnehin das Gebiet aktualisiert hätte. Aber an sich sind Flächen immer besser als Nodes, weil sie schlicht mehr Information abbilden (in diesem Beispiel z.B. die Ausdehnung der Geschäfte und die Verknüpfung mit den Eingängen). Nodes sind nur deshalb üblicher, weil die entsprechende Information oft nicht bekannt ist.
DD1GJ (2016-05-12 09:07:03+00:00): Hallo TrackCop,

die Quellenangabe "Seekarte 2016" ist etwas diffus. Je nach Herausgeber können Urheberrechte bestehen, die wir bei OSM berücksichtigen müssen. Es gibt einiges amtliches als OpenData. Das solltest Du vervenden und auch als Quelle angeben. Frag am besten bei OpenSeaMap nach: http://openseamap.org
GerdP (2017-09-10 07:44:55+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=emergency + area=yes
Maybe you meant area:highway=emergency?
gormo (2017-05-05 07:17:32+00:00): Hier https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58268 im Forum wird die Löschung des Weges durchs Wolfsbachtal ("gibt es nicht mehr") diskutiert. Kannst Du dich da mal melden, denn es gibt scheinbar andere Meinungen. Vielen Dank!
wolfbert (2025-08-14 08:06:44+00:00): OEC Logistics in Meierhofgasse 15 - gibt's das noch?
literan (2016-05-09 22:13:36+00:00): Здесь то же самое - вы уверены, что это места для установки палаток? в name (название) пишут только официальное название (proof?) - а так, похоже, это надо в тег description
Владимир К (2016-05-08 07:54:18+00:00): Здравствуйте! хочу поправить вам. по правилам проекта номера дома записываются 34Д, а не 34д