piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gertjan Idema (2017-05-07 12:06:09+00:00): Mooi werk Zugführer.
@JJJWegdam, mag ik vragen wat je geprobeerd hebt om met de perrons te doen?
Zowel de trein, als de busperrons zijn in stukjes geknipt, die ik daar nog nooit gezien heb. Bovendien zijn de trein perrons genummerd met spoornummers in plaats van perronnummers. Utrecht ken acht treinperrons, genummerd van 1 t/m 8 en die bestaan uit 1 stuk. Jouw oplossing om perrons in stukjes te knippen en daar spoornummers aan toe te kennen is volgens mij mappen voor de renderer. Als je de spoornumers op een kaart wilt hebben, kan je een verzoek indienen bij de maker van die kaart.
Nog een puntje: Alle OV-poortjes (zijn het er echt zo veel?) staan dubbel in OSM.
JJJWegdam (2017-05-07 17:06:46+00:00): @Gertjan:

Over perronnummers versus spoornummers zegt Wikipedia het volgende: "Voorheen werd bij het vertrek van een trein aangekondigd van welk perronnummer de trein vertrok. De reizigers moesten dan nog uitzoeken aan welke kant van het perron. Tegenwoordig zijn de perrons niet meer genummerd en wordt het spoornummer bekendgemaakt. Toch spreken reizigers nog vaak van perron waarmee ze spoor bedoelen."

Tegenwoordig worden perronnummers zowel door reizigers als door de sector niet meer gebruikt. Daarom is het in Nederland common-practise om perrons te taggen met spoornummers. We doen het overigens altijd nog beter dan Duitsland, waar perrons getagt worden met stationsnamen.

Verder waren de 'stukjes' al aanwezig en noodzakelijk vóór mijn changeset. De opdeling in een a- en b-zijde maken dat het voor allerlei toepassingen best lastig is om goed hun werk te doen. Naar mijn mening heb ik dat zo goed mogelijk opgelost. Ik betreur dat er vaak al heel snel "mapping for the renderer" geroepen wordt in onze community.

Ten slotte over de OV-poortjes: ik zal de dubbele OV-poortjes herstellen. Ik heb geen idee of het er echt zoveel zijn. Ik heb gegokt dat ze een bepaalde breedte hadden. Ik nodig je van harte uit om ze te gaan tellen, maar tot die tijd denk ik dat het een vrij aardige representatie is van de lay-out van het station.
eggie (2017-04-19 08:31:40+00:00): Je bent ook welkom op het forum van OSM. Je kunt je evt. voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Glassman (2017-04-19 00:00:48+00:00): The park is already mapped in OSM. Please don't vandalize the work of others.
francoLI (2017-04-22 16:13:07+00:00): per esperienza personale il confine ISTAT di Milo sul lato di Bosco Barone   è errato
fayor (2017-04-22 20:41:18+00:00): Ho seguito il confine risultante dalla CTR, che corrisponde a quello delle tavolette IGM. In effetti il confine Istat è diverso e non so da dove deriva ma se ho capito bene tu concordi che è errato.
francoLI (2017-04-23 03:03:33+00:00): ho lavorato su delle carte catastali sul campo,e stavo commettendo l'errore di seguire le carte alla 'cieca'.
spesse volte le carte si ricopiano l'una con l'altra, e se una edizione compie un errore l'altra lo riporta pure. è successo così anche con il nome della SIC Canalone del Tripodo che in realtà si trova nella Valle del Bove
fayor (2017-04-23 13:05:54+00:00): E quindi? quale sarebbe il confine corretto risultante dalle carte catastali? Io ho trovato il piano regolatore di Milo e riporta il confine che ho seguito io (non quello Istat).
francoLI (2017-04-23 18:36:23+00:00): Non so se si vede
https://www.google.it/maps/@37.7047991,15.1149695,3a,75y,13.46h,88.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sC_RLRA9jnGbN3fS1_jTpSw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1

quel muro in pietra lavica(ma solo quello) è comune di Milo, adesso confrontalo con le tue carte.chiaramente in casi di confini le carte catastali sono più precise
francoLI (2017-04-23 18:37:29+00:00): in quel punto avevo cerato di correggerlo,  se vai nella cronologia
fayor (2017-04-23 20:34:24+00:00): Parlavamo di due tratti diversi: io mi riferivo al confine Milo-Sant'Alfio, nei pressi del rifugio Citelli.
Quello che dici tu è il confine Milo-Zafferana, ho controllato e sembrerebbe corretto così ma non ho le carte catastali e quindi non posso verificare
francoLI (2017-04-24 04:58:52+00:00): Sul Rifugio Citelli vi è una vecchia querelle perchè nel 56 la scissione in quei luoghi non fu ben definita
francoLI (2017-04-24 05:04:19+00:00): l'ultima volta che me ne occupai, qualche anno fa , praticamente Rifugio Citelli era un'isola amministrativa di S.Alfio dentro il territorio di Milo
fayor (2017-05-14 15:43:27+00:00): Ho consultato le carte catastali: il confine Milo-Zafferana a Bosco Barone doveva essere spostato un po' più a sud. Per quanto riguarda il confine nord con Sant'Alfio, il rifugio è nel comune di Milo, contrariamente ai confini Istat.
francoLI (2017-05-14 17:43:21+00:00): Il confine del Comune di Milo a Rifugio Citelli quello corretto è quello che tu hai cartografato, solamente lo stabile del Rifugio Citelli è oggetto di contenzioso fra i  due Comuni perchè la proprietà è del Comune di S.Alfio, e nel '56 quando vi fu la scissione di MIlo questa parte del confine non fu chiarita del tutto
fayor (2017-05-14 22:43:05+00:00): Sono due cose diverse: la proprietà del rifugio può essere del comune di S. Alfio, di un comune diverso o di un tizio qualsiasi. La delimitazione territoriale serve invece, tra le altre cose, a determinare l'ambito di estensione della competenza del comune (ad esempio in materia di ordinanze o di piano regolatore). La legge regionale che ha istituito il comune di Milo (L.R. 8 del 1955) è chiarissima nel delimitare il confine, indicando nel dettaglio sia le particelle che i fogli di mappa da ripartire tra i due comuni.
francoLI (2017-05-15 06:41:46+00:00): le carte parlano in un modo, ma la querelle esiste. ho anche visto delle carte per la composizione della querelle. difatti i servizi comunali, ma stiamo parlando di una sola struttura, al Rifugio sono del Comune di S.Alfio! al momento la struttura del Rifugio e l'area a corte sono un'isola amministrativa di S.Alfio dentro Milo
5m4u9 (2017-04-20 06:00:55+00:00): please checkout our classification of christian denomination (subtype of main religion). if you have improvements of classification please send a email to talk@openstreetmap.org for discution.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination#Christian_denominations
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-30 13:18:07+00:00): Hi Stephen, I notice you have specified access=no and foot=yes on a number of footways in the area, giving rise to some confusion. As footways prohibit all other forms of access than foot (unless explicitly added) it is unclear what is meant by combining access=no with foot=yes on a footway.

Regards,
Mike
Stephen the Geographer (2017-04-30 16:22:04+00:00): Mike, I haven't contributed much yet to OSM so I'm happy to be corrected.  What combination of tags should i use for a footpath?
Stephen
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-30 16:47:09+00:00): Hi Stephen, if the general public can use the footpath then you are best leaving access unset and using foot=yes. If is is signed as a public footpath, use foot=designated with designation=public_footpath. If it is signed as permissive, use foot=permissive. If the path can't be used by the public, then use foot=private or foot=no as appropriate. The tagging you used is not wrong, but with the common misuse of access=no (for example at no entry signs on roads forgetting that the sign only prohibits vehicular traffic) readers of the data cannot be sure whether the access=no was unnecessarily added to prohibit the other types of user, or because the path has been closed and they mistakenly thought this would override the foot=yes.

Happy mapping,
Mike
mvexel (2017-04-18 23:09:06+00:00): Hi Angel Collins, 
Some of the things you added to OpenStreetMap don't seem to exist in reality. Please only add things to OpenStreetMap that exist and can be verified to others. OpenStreetMap maps and data are used by millions of people who rely on the data being accurate. 
From your comment, it looks like this is part of a class exercise. Please make sure to forward this message to your fellow students and teacher. Thanks!

By the way: don't hesitate to get in touch with me, I am local here in SLC and happy to help you make great contributions to OpenStreetMap.

Martijn
bhousel (2017-04-24 21:52:29+00:00): Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 21:46:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487847750
building=G
Is that the name of that building or is it a typo?
alexkemp (2021-12-05 01:29:57+00:00): Hi there Marc.

Unfortunately, at this distance of time, the straightforward answer is "I do not know". My best guess is that it was supposed to be "Garage", but I do not know.

There are some Mapilliary photos taken at the time (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.979849027778&lng=-1.0716506944444&z=17&pKey=504470307563688), but those are for the Western Power boxes at the top of the street and, although next door to house#3, do not show the annex at all. The fact that there is NOT a photo of the building in question suggests that it is personal to house#3 (I would not take a photo in that case).

This location is far from where I live, and there is zero other reason to update the mapping there.

Sorry again, Marc. I have no idea what the designation stands for, if anything, or if it is a typo.
Glassman (2017-04-18 23:54:59+00:00): the tag amenity=school isn't needed on artwork already inside of the school boundary. I removed the tag.
nevw (2017-04-19 07:56:34+00:00): Hi
Yes I think I made an error in mapping that bit originally and haven't been back for quite some time.
I re-mapped the road section as a concrete path instead and removed the Sandalwood Crescent name from the stub that joins Lemongrass Circuit.
I will cycle out there tomorrow if weather is ok to confirm.
nevw (2017-04-20 03:47:28+00:00): Footway and addition of lift gate confirmed by survey today.
Cascafico (2021-01-26 12:45:03+00:00): Ciao,
sto cercando info sulla lettera "d" che appare in questo ed nei ref di diverse aviosuperfici italiane. Che significa?
dgitto (2021-01-26 14:21:19+00:00): Ma dove? Fammi un esempio, perché non trovo nessuna "d", almeno dallo smartphone
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-14 15:07:14+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1238272 ?
sofieneba (2019-07-01 07:46:27+00:00): le nom de la commune Chenin Douiret est remplacée par le nom Tataouine Sud suite à l'arrêté 04/04/2017
DavidKewley (2017-04-19 05:03:04+00:00): In Laguna Niguel, CA (near me), you deleted all tags http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=321217297 from the Lifetime Fitness parking area http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321217297 except amenity=parking. The tags you deleted looked probably accurate and helpful to me. Why did you delete them?

I spot-checked the first way listed below (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429486891) and it looks like you made a similar senseless-seeming change there.

Why did you do this? In what sense did you "fix problems"?
clay_c (2017-04-19 08:20:31+00:00): Oof, there are some tags that shouldn't have been deleted. I'll fix that.

As for the Lifetime Fitness issues, someone had gone through and added in all the Lifetime Fitness locations across the country... poorly. There was a lot of messy data: parking lots drawn as one giant zig-zagging parking aisle; duplicate tags everywhere such that the address and contact info of each location was put on the building, the parking lot, the parking aisles, the tennis courts, etc; swimming pools drawn fenced-in area around them... I could go on.

I'd rather have incomplete data than wrong data, so I fixed as much as I could and deleted things that were beyond repair. It looks like I accidentally took some useful data with it - I'll go back and review my changes.
DavidKewley (2017-04-19 14:55:39+00:00): Thanks very much! Makes more sense to me now.
Supaplex (2017-04-19 07:04:08+00:00): 樹林火車站標在建物了
Raymond Wu (2017-04-19 07:07:58+00:00): 其實我有看到，不過那個標法繪圖上會有障礙，除非全台灣的車站都用建物標，不然 Render 設定會很肥。
Marych_ (2017-04-19 12:47:39+00:00): Что там не верно было?
24 и 7 школы были уже отмечены?
bhousel (2017-04-24 21:41:42+00:00): Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
pezizomycotina (2017-04-25 00:52:40+00:00): Thanks, I'm looking forward to contributing more!
Chrysopras (2017-04-19 05:28:55+00:00): Hallo Sammelmuetze, es wäre toll, wenn Du im Changeset-Kommentar genauer erklären könntest, was Du gemacht hast („corrected street(s)“ ist, hust, seeehr allgemein ;-). Solche überregionalen Korrekturen können sehr wertvoll sein, es ist aber auch sehr schwer, sie von Vandalismus und Verschlimmbesserungen zu unterscheiden, da sie Tools wie Achavi überfordern. Kleinere Gebiete wären sehr gut und genauere Changeset-Kommentare wären hilfreich, damit andere Mapper Deine Arbeit richtig verstehen und würdigen können. Viele Grüße -- Chrysopras
chnav (2017-04-19 08:27:17+00:00): Здравствуйте, зачем вы удалили полигон здания. Если вы рисуете здания разной этажности - пожалуйста используйте уже существующие объекты чтобы сохранить историю кто и когда начал их наносить. Кроме того, здание переменной этажности вы внесли неправильно - нет общего контура здания, нет building:part и т.д. редактор iD не лучший помощник в этом деле, он многое портит. Всё исправляю.
chnav (2017-04-19 08:36:36+00:00): Также дороги во дворах и по территориям предприятий/учреждений обычно service, не residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47930207
Minh Nguyen (2019-11-19 21:02:26+00:00): This is an unofficial running route that isn’t assigned or maintained by a road, trail, or park agency. It doesn’t belong in OSM proper, but it can be overlaid on an OSM basemap in a third-party website or application, for example using umap.openstreetmap.fr.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-19 23:14:11+00:00): Hello,
In this edit you've deleted the clothes shop that was downstairs - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47924997 - was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
British Passports UK (2017-04-20 04:29:42+00:00): Sorry, it may be by mistake I will delete my listing
Regards Steve
BharataHS (2017-04-19 11:40:45+00:00): Hello Cristocracies,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and Thank you for your contributions. In this edit, I observed that you have added a tag `landuse=ground cover` for a park which is an invalid tag. Please refer the wiki for details and appropriate tags. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
Have deleted the invalid tag. Please be careful during your further edits. 

Thank you.
giggls (2017-07-12 14:26:26+00:00): Hallo,

was bringt dich Dazu solche Umbenennungen zu machen, die vor Ort an keiner Stelle zu sehen sind? Ich muss das als Ortskundiger ehrlich gesagt erst mal für falsch halten.

Dass diese Filiale westlich der anderen liegt ergibt sich aus deren Geokoordinate und hat IMO im name Tag nichts verloren.

Nicht mal auf http://www.badische-backstub.de/ wird diese Bezeichnung zur Unterscheidung der Filialen verwendet.

Gruss

Sven
giggls (2017-07-18 07:55:23+00:00): Hallo,

da keine Reaktion kam habe ich diesen changeset und 47926088 revertiert.

Es gibt noch genug neues zu mappen, daher würde ich Dir empfehlen künftig nicht mehr bestehende Sachen zu "verschlimmbessern".

Gruss

Sven
tonyf1 (2017-04-30 01:49:44+00:00): Hi. I doubt there is a historic monument in the middle of the bridge named "Beautiful bridge. Possibly delete the monument and tag the bridge historic = yes and/or tourism=attraction, and/or tourism=viewpoint
tonyf1 (2017-05-04 01:57:42+00:00): No reply to changeset comment. Deleting monument and tagging bridge with tourism=attraction
irateh (2017-05-11 13:19:55+00:00): this is another undiscussed deletion of map details. the way may be dicouraged, but it is still there - please comment on this destructive interaction!
DD1GJ (2017-05-12 11:21:55+00:00): The ways were removed and are now recaptured by nature. This place belongs to a national park.
geow (2017-05-12 13:06:20+00:00): Instead of simply deleting a way, I would suggest using the lifecycle-prefix abandoned:highway=*

This would somewhat reduce the risk, that armchair mappers reintroduce the way from outdated imagery.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Tractor (2017-04-22 05:43:53+00:00): Is it really a shelter here? I went here last summer, and the only thing I could see around the junction was the guidepost.
Wulfmorn (2017-04-22 12:58:33+00:00): The note claimed there was, you claim there isnt. Probably best to remove it. Better a happy surprise to find a shelter rather than the reverse :)
Tractor (2017-04-22 19:32:15+00:00): I just had a look at the Gule sider imagery you linked to in your comment to the note. It does indeed look like some kind of small building structure, but i think that in reality it is only a rock. If you look at the Bing imagery (taken during winter conditions), it appears just like any other bare spot not covered by snow. It looks similar to Bing in Mapbox's imagery (also with snow). Actually, I think I sat down on that very same rock and had my lunch when I was there :-).
Wulfmorn (2017-04-22 20:17:49+00:00): What did you have?
Tractor (2017-04-22 20:22:14+00:00): Bread with cheese.
althio (2017-04-19 09:08:19+00:00): Bonjour Marie5k,

Merci de contribuer et d'enrichir la carte et les données OpenStreetMap !

Vous pouvez essayer de préciser la fonction de ce point.
Avec l'éditeur sur le site web OpenStreetMap, vous pouvez :
- sélectionner votre point sur la carte
- sur le volet de gauche, cliquer sur "Point (Changer l'objet)"
- sur la ligne rechercher, commencer à écrire "déchet..."
- dans la liste, cliquer sur "Déchetterie"

Pour aller plus, on pourrait supprimer le nom qui n'est peut-être pas significatif.
Autres éléments intéressants : la rubrique "Accepte" pour sélectionner les matériaux.

Si vous voulez suggérer des modifications plus avancées sur la carte, vous pouvez laisser une note (sur la droite de la carte, une icône avec une bulle de dialogue). Soyez explicite dans les informations que vous souhaitez ajouter mais que vous n'avez pas réalisé vous-même.

J'ai lu votre entrée de journal OSM mais ce n'est pas le meilleur moyen de communication pour une modification locale.

Bien cordialement et à bientôt j'espère.

- althio
Dalkvist (2017-04-19 07:33:45+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 
Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
muralito (2017-04-20 02:00:06+00:00): Estimado drcarqueja, esa base es solo uso interno no? o tambien atienden pacientes ahi?
aceman444 (2020-06-25 16:09:47+00:00): Zdravim, prosim neodstranujte addr:conscriptionnumber. Ak ma budova len supisne cislo, vyplnte aj addr:conscriptionnumber aj addr:housenumber rovnakou hodnotou. Dakujem
chnav (2017-04-19 08:45:06+00:00): Объясните пожалуйста причину удаления здания, которое видно на MapBox. Восстановил. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424980098/history

Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте без основательных на то причин и пока не приобретете достаточно опыта.
Leshiy2k (2017-04-19 11:44:39+00:00): Потому что пока обновятся снимки - там ещё и железная дорога появится. Сейчас на этом месте никакого здания нет, его снесли примерно месяц назад.
chnav (2017-04-19 12:07:21+00:00): Если что-то снесено в реальности и вы удаляете объект из ОСМ, пожалуйста давайте осмысленный комментарий к changeset, например "удалил здание т.к. снесено тогда-то по такой-то причине".
chnav (2017-04-19 12:11:15+00:00): Я поменял ему теги, чтобы не перерисовывали и пока не удаляли https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424980098
Leshiy2k (2017-04-19 12:17:14+00:00): Хорошо. Но на этом пятаке сейчас очень массово ведутся работы, там весь частный сектор сносят, строят дорогу и т.д.
Commodoortje (2017-04-19 08:14:58+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
poornibadrinath (2017-04-20 10:05:06+00:00): Hi Bomin Kim,
  I came across your changeset and noticed you have added a church over a school building. Can you please confirm which one is the correct building? Also, it would be great if you remove the wrong building from the map. Thanks! 
Best,
Poornima
az09 (2021-05-09 10:04:53+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=146&error=120426749
что это было?
Damnit (2021-05-11 08:23:00+00:00): когда-то это была тропинка. что-то пошло не так.
RoterEmil (2017-05-21 11:47:17+00:00): Hallo M_Kucha, zur Gotthelfstraße 97 (w487922558): ich finde für diese Adresse, wie auch für alle Häuser der Hausnr. 86-120 die PLZ 44229. Auf welcher Grundlage hast Du die Adresse gesetzt? Grüße
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:10:17+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-10 08:21:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392961485/history

Do you maybe remember this object or can resurvey it or ask someone for help?

I am confused by shop=repair on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392961485/history where it seems (judging by name) a moving company.

Sorry for bothering you about an ancient edit.
Multi Pass (2023-02-10 08:35:09+00:00): No worries. It's a lawn mower servicing and parts shop. I changed it to shop=groundskeeping.

Cheers
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-10 18:29:56+00:00): oh, this kind of mowing - thanks!
Sanniu (2017-04-27 09:17:31+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487924484 have strange geometry, can you check?
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-02 11:19:03+00:00): Definitely an error in an attempt to mark scrubs/forests via Bing. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48332172
Dalkvist (2017-04-19 08:15:17+00:00): Hi, please note that there are no tide to speak of in the Baltic sea (~1cm) so when mapping the coastline please include the gravel beach in the island.
Omegatherion (2017-04-20 15:25:38+00:00): bicycle=yes und Radfahrer absteigen widerspricht sich aber.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-12 12:50:58+00:00): Addresses were not renamed at the same time the street was renamed.  Done.
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-20 05:40:55+00:00): Šito vandens telkinio nėra Lietuvos Upių, ežerų ir tvenkinių kadastre, todėl tai nėra ežeras. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
Andrea Musuruane (2018-01-24 17:21:23+00:00): Ciao Marco, ho notato solo oggi che non sono stati inseriti alcuni toponimi (presenti negli Open Data). Io ho trovato Broglina e Cascina Bonifica. Li aggiungo io. Ciao, Andrea
mbranco2 (2018-02-14 19:24:31+00:00): Grazie,  strano che me li sia persi...
Allroads (2017-04-19 10:11:07+00:00): Hoi, Al lang lid.
"Welkom op OSM”
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. 
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Ik heb de brievenbus van de weg gehaald/verplaatst.

Gebruik Nederland luchtfoto actueel.

Gebouw wijzingen, verzoek op het forum.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-19 10:24:34+00:00): Er,
You've deleted the weather buoy at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history
Was this intentional?
Best Regards,
Andy
nammala (2017-04-19 11:56:43+00:00): Hi andy,

This is accidental, It might have deleted when I was reverting this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47788862?node_page=2 , which has null island edits . Could you please bring back the buoy edits.

Regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse (2017-04-19 21:34:16+00:00): Thanks - I've undeleted it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47952895 .
nammala (2017-04-20 04:03:57+00:00): Thanks andy .