piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-09-16 04:09:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2018-09-18 04:11:35+00:00): Way 625872547 tagged as building=retail .. in not a single building. I have removed this tagging.
viloan (2018-09-16 04:30:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2018-09-16 11:48:46+00:00): не надо расставлять выдуманные парки. Покемоны не придут.
Lojke (2018-09-16 12:20:56+00:00): Вам бы стоило приехать и посмотреть лично.
Система не позволяет сделать отдельную зону - "Аллея". Самое близкое - "Парк". 
И вы не поверите, но там действительно гуляют люди. С детьми, инвалиды на колясках.
literan (2018-09-16 20:43:21+00:00): аллея в русском языке это дорога, обсаженная деревьями https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%8F При чем тут тег leisure=park (который в OSM означает учреждение, созданное в рекреационных целях - но не дворовые территории), я не понимаю. Отметьте деревья и дорогу.
streinger (2018-09-16 09:26:20+00:00): дома не существует, зачем "добавлять" непроверенную информацию
streinger (2018-09-16 09:26:06+00:00): дома не существует, зачем "добавлять" непроверенную информацию
marc__marc (2023-06-23 19:03:49+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5532250159
par layer=1, est-ce que c'est pas level=1 dont tu veux parler ? à savoir l'entrée située au niveau 1  ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Warin61 (2018-09-18 04:11:32+00:00): Reverted. 
The relation created was not an area. 
The deletion of existing areas last information. 
There were no relations changed by this changeset.
streinger (2018-09-16 09:45:42+00:00): это Пролетарская 82/Корецкой 9, 84-го дома вообще не существует, а у того пристроя которому вы 82 номер назначили скорее всего номер 80.
Адреса изменил, у пристроя номер убрал.
Просьба проверять информацию.
dktue (2018-09-17 13:39:26+00:00): Sieht gut aus!
viloan (2018-09-16 05:39:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Robert46798 (2018-09-17 07:59:00+00:00): Hallo RedSand605,
Herzlich wilkommen (zurück) bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Ergänzungen!

Du hast den neuen Namen am Gebäude eingetragen. Das ist grundsätzlich nicht verkehrt. Allerdings gibt es jetzt in der Datenbank eine Realschule in der Oberschule. Der alte Name ist nämlich noch am SchulGELÄNDE eingetragen. Da vermutlich das gesamte eingetragene Gelände zur Schule gehört, scheint mir das auch passender.

Ich würde also den Namen vom Gebäude entfernen und dafür den Namen auf dem Gelände entfernen.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Robert46798 (2018-09-17 08:19:20+00:00): Hallo RedSand605,

danke für die Ergänzung.

Als Name erscheint mir in diesem Fall schlicht 'Rewe' besser geeignet. Die Bezeichnung die jetzt verwendet wird würde ich dann als Betreiber ('operator') eintragen. Hier kann im Wiki noch einmal die Vielfältigkeit der Namenseintragung nachgelsen werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name


Für zukünftige Änderungen würde ich dich noch bitten, darauf zu achten, dass immer ein aussagekräftiger Kommentar am Bearbeitungssatz hinterlegt ist. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments) Das macht die Zu- und Einordnung leichter. Bei Gebäuden wie diesem wäre auch ein Hinweis hilfreich, woher die Information kommt. Da im aktuellen Luftbild noch kein Markt ist, ist es gut zu Wissen, ob die Lage nur geschätzt oder vielleicht mit einer GPS-Spur abgefahren ist. Dann können zukünftige Mapper schneller einschätzen, ob es Verbesserungspotenzial gibt. Am Besten nutzt man dafür einen Notizeintrag. In ein Feld 'note' schreiben und dahinter die entsprechende Bemerkung. Oder wenn definitiv nachgebessert werden muss (also bei geschätzen Lagen), geht auch 'fixme' und dann ein freier Text. [Im Wiki hier nachzuelsen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme]
maraf24 (2018-09-19 13:29:25+00:00): Zniknęła wieś Boguszowa.
Radzę z rozwagą używać narzędzi masowej edycji, takich jak plugin do mergowania adresów.
piotrS (2018-09-19 18:23:16+00:00): Przywróciłem Boguszową. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.
maraf24 (2018-09-19 18:43:52+00:00): Dzięki.
Jakka (2018-09-17 07:57:12+00:00): send message to Oliver:
name 	toilettage canin
shop 	wine
opening_hours 	24/7
eggie (2018-09-16 09:01:18+00:00): Prima!
GOwin (2018-09-20 23:55:38+00:00): Thank you for you contributions. Kindly remember to square building corners you digitize. Just press the 's' key when a building is selected.
RicoElectrico (2018-09-16 10:12:38+00:00): Cześć, trochę musiałem posprzątać, niemniej dziękuję za edycję. :)



Kilka uwag:

- Nie ma potrzeby nazywać budynku "Sikorskiego 8H". Sam adres wystarczy.

- Nazwa ulicy w adresie to powinno być "Generala Władysława Sikorskiego" - tak jak nazywa się ulica. Spójność jest ważna, bo nie wszystkie wyszukiwarki adresów ogarną tę sprawę, jeśli nie będzie ulicy o dokładnie takiej samej nazwie jak ta z adresu. My w Polsce mamy tzw. mrówki - mapę która wynajduje tego typu błędy. http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/

- Jeśli budynek jest prostokątem to wystarczy dać 4 węzły w rogach... i użyć opcji prostowania do 90 stopni (jest po zaznaczeniu budynku i wybraniu opcji z menu pod prawym przyciskiem myszy lub S na klawiaturze).

Jeśli masz pytania, coś jest niejasne - śmiało pisz!
l3BAM (2018-12-28 10:50:23+00:00): À propos de Candé ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/47.94979/-1.61254 admin_level=8 signifie qu'il s'agit d'une commune. Or il n'y a aucune commune appelée Candé dans les environs d'après Geoportail. Êtes-vous sûr ? Je suppose que c'est plutôt la Régère qui devrait être marqué comme hameau.
maraf24 (2018-10-06 21:33:38+00:00): Zmiany wycofane z tego samego powodu, co wcześniejszy zestaw.
literan (2018-09-16 11:54:29+00:00): лихо вы площадку нарисовали прямо по крышам домов. Извините, не пойдет, откачу. Дополнительно, тег name - Только для имен собственных, а не описаний
mosstreet (2018-09-20 09:57:06+00:00): поигрался и хватит
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-24 18:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62890684 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some garbage imported data in Bangladesh; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2255
Fischkopp0815 (2018-09-17 05:24:16+00:00): Ich habe die von dir verschobenen Gebäude zurückgeschoben. Die waren nach den damals verfügbaren Bing-Luftbildern(ca. 2012) ausgerichtet, die ziemlich lagegenau waren. Die jetzigen Bing-Bilder sind zwar aktueller (ca. 2016) aber ziemlich verschoben. Die von dir veränderden Garagen sind erhalten. Aktuell gibt es die "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" Bilder. Die entsprechen in dieser Gegende den alten Bing-Bildern
viloan (2018-09-16 07:21:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Something B (2018-09-16 11:04:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, Argint!
Что именно Вы пытались отметить черещ maps.me?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62628281
eggie (2018-09-16 08:14:42+00:00): Dag Herman.. Bevindt zich werkelijk midden op de straat een fietsenzaak?
Graag reactie
MVG,
Eggie
HermanHillebrand (2018-09-16 08:32:41+00:00): Bedankt, aangepast.
JeroenHoek (2018-09-16 08:34:10+00:00): Heb ik daar een steek laten vallen? Ik dacht dat ik ze allemaal weer goed na het aanpassen van dat kruispuntgeval. Bedankt.
stephankn (2021-02-15 09:04:59+00:00): amenity=post_box
name:en=Ernst

sounds unrealistic. Please explain.
streinger (2018-09-16 08:24:55+00:00): Коростелёвых 62/8? здание до сих пор на стадии фундамента, откуда у него адрес?
opendcc (2018-09-16 08:44:30+00:00): Noch gibt es die befestigten Flächen. Erst letzte Woche stand da die Verkehrsüberwachung drin ... access=no war schon richtig.
eggie (2018-09-16 08:53:54+00:00): Oke.. Wellicht kun je de naam van de fietsenzaak achterhalen. We taggen in principe bij op de reeds aanwezige adresnode van het Kadaster. Is dat nr. 28 hier?
Probeer ook concreet aan te geven wat je edits zijn... dus "fietsenzaak toegevoegd."
Ik zal je de welkomstmail sturen zoals nieuwe mappers die tegenwoordig krijgen met allerlei nuttige links en tips, want er zit een grote "onderbreking" in je bijdragen. Misschien kun je er wat mee.
ma-rt-in (2018-09-19 13:59:24+00:00): Hallo,

was soll den dies Regio Radroute sein?
streinger (2018-09-16 09:01:58+00:00): это не ул. Энергетиков, откуда информация, с яндекс карт? улица Энергетиков уже есть на карте, перед поворотом на данную улицу  с Терешковой есть информационный знак+ там здания с одной стороны чётные, с другой нечётные
streinger (2018-09-16 09:02:26+00:00): правку откатил
mavl (2018-11-08 04:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64280282 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
flohoff (2018-09-17 13:59:23+00:00): Hi Haleo,
der Changeset kommentar ist wirklich dafür dar im Text zu beschreiben was und vor allem warum man da was geändert/ergänzt hat. Das kann man sich dann in diversen streams von änderungen durchlesen und die änderungen ansehen.

Ich selber sehe mir fast alle changesets in OWL an.

Flo
Colin Smale (2018-09-16 10:30:38+00:00): Please revert this change. Leave UK tagging and UK politics to the UK community.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-16 11:11:25+00:00): @The%20Maarssen%20Mapper Changeset reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62632427 .

@Ant%20Ko You've made a number of problematical changes to OSM in the past and have been blocked for periods of time for doing so: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ant%20Ko/blocks .  Please don't make changes that you don't understand, or understand will cause problems.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Almtesh (2018-09-16 09:47:32+00:00): Hello, I don't speak German, sorry.
What did you ask a review for?
Beiri22 (2018-09-16 09:56:55+00:00): Sorry, I did not think of that. I have been on vacation there and google routes showed me the way through that gate. But it cannot be passed by cars, because it's closed halfways. I have adapted the gates description for cars to the value "no" ... Do you know if this setting prevents car routes through the gate?
Almtesh (2018-09-16 10:33:51+00:00): No, it will not help since Google does not use OSM data. According to the route I asked to Google (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/43.7877379,4.8349441/43.7880021,4.833423/@43.7878789,4.8339844,19.5z/data=!4m2!4m1!3e0), you will still go through the gate.
If you want to use this map for routing, I suggest you to use app like OSMAnd.
Beiri22 (2018-09-16 10:39:14+00:00): Sorry again for the misunderstanding. I am aware that google does not use osm data. I have submitted my issue to google and osm. What I wanted to know is, does the gate setting prevent osm based routing from using the gate?
Almtesh (2018-09-16 10:51:32+00:00): According to GraphHopper (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=43.78748%2C4.83483%3B43.78828%2C4.83316#map=18/43.78894/4.83243), it works.
mbirth (2019-08-24 12:59:13+00:00): Why did you set maxspeed:backward for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625915624 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625915623 to 1 km/h? I've set maxspeed to 80 now as per adjacent parts of that road.
StephaneP (2019-08-24 16:58:45+00:00): Hi!

Wow, It looks like a mistake with the maxspeed and the lane tags.
Thanks you for having fixed that.

Stf
Hjart (2018-09-16 09:29:32+00:00): Jeg har rettet dette idet det ikke ser helt sandsynligt ud at forbindelsen skulle krydse over til den nordlige side af Vesterbrogade.
fatuus (2018-09-16 10:14:43+00:00): Du har rätt. Buffrade för litet område och missade att Vesterbrogade var uppdelad i två. Tack!
MarkusHD (2018-11-19 07:35:19+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier die separate Fläche für das Pflegeheim Haus Sankt Jakobus gelöscht und die Daten aufs Gebäude übertragen. Zur Pflegeeinrichtung gehört aber neben dem reinen Gebäude noch weiteres wie die Außenanlagen.
Geofreund1 (2018-11-19 10:24:16+00:00): Hab's mal versucht, zu verbessern, so richtig gefällt mir das ganze aber nicht, da so Informationen doppelt eingetragen sind. Gilt übrigens auch für den von dir eingetragenen Kindergarten in der Nähe.
MarkusHD (2018-11-19 11:47:08+00:00): War ja auch so gemeint, den POI dann vom Gebäude wieder zu entfernen und nicht doppelt stehen zu lassen. Hab das angepasst und auch den ursprünglichen und von dir gelöschten way wiederhergestellt.

Beim Kindergarten ist außer der Adresse nichts doppelt eingetragen, das Gebäude hat kein amenity=kindergarten, nur das Gelände.
dktue (2018-09-17 12:01:01+00:00): Wow !
yxoc (2018-11-13 07:02:30+00:00): Bonjour, merci de ne pas mettre operaor= (ni network=) sur les arrets de bus, ces tags sont a mettre sur les relations route seulement.

Cordialement -yxoc
trial (2022-05-17 19:14:12+00:00): Ni laïque comme religion. Au plus mettez religion=no.
streinger (2018-09-16 09:56:02+00:00): не 2/2, здание с таким номером рядом.
Constable (2019-03-10 15:37:47+00:00): Ciao Franco, occhio però perchè questo tratto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150802613/history è un sentiero, volgarmente chiamato singletrack dai ciclisti; i veicoli a motore non ci passano neanche volendo, la larghezza è < al metro. Immagino ti tu sia confuso con la sterrata appena ad est.
Correggo
barberoux (2018-11-25 21:06:13+00:00): Hat es einen Grund, warum das Gebäude Plantagenstraße 1 nicht mit einer Adresse versehen wurde, sondern per Punkt gesetzt wurde?
angelika (2018-11-25 21:33:13+00:00): Es sind beide Varianten möglich und üblich, wobei es mir persönlich besser gefällt, das Gebäude mit einer Adresse zu versehen. Möglicherweise habe ich in diesem Fall beabsichtigt, die Adresse wegen der Form des Gebäudes in die Nähe des Gebäudeeinganges zu setzen. 

Wenn Dir das nicht gefällt, kannst Du es ruhig ändern.
maraf24 (2018-10-15 20:27:10+00:00): Skasowanie poprawnej nazwy drogi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-20 04:58:06+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3484075 ?
atcomapper (2018-09-16 10:17:07+00:00): Please avoid adding postal addresses to entire camping areas. An address in Denmark is defined as a single point, not a large area, and adding the address to a large area might mess up navigation.
atcomapper (2018-09-16 10:26:01+00:00): Please note that we have extremely good address data in Denmark, with almost 100% of all addresses being automatically imported and updated from a government database. So you should not go about editing Danish addresses manually.
Tomi (2018-09-16 20:29:32+00:00): Sorry. I d'ont agree. The wiki say, that address is ok for camp_site, and camp_site can be point or area. And 9% of all camp_site in osm have addr.
Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp_site
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=camp_site
and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=tourism&value=camp_site#combinations
I putted the address as an Info of the camping not as a stand alone address. 
Points vs. area: if a camping as an area can have an e-mail address or a phone number, why not an address?

If you think it is not ok, then change before the english and the german wiki.
Tomi (2018-09-16 20:29:38+00:00): Sorry. I d'ont agree. The wiki say, that address is ok for camp_site, and camp_site can be point or area. And 9% of all camp_site in osm have addr.
Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp_site
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=camp_site
and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=tourism&value=camp_site#combinations
I putted the address as an Info of the camping not as a stand alone address. 
Points vs. area: if a camping as an area can have an e-mail address or a phone number, why not an address?

If you think it is not ok, then change before the english and the german wiki.
tyr_asd (2018-09-17 11:28:19+00:00): > automatically imported and updated from a government database. So you should not go about editing Danish addresses manually.

Hi! I'm wondering about this statement:

1. How does this matter in the situation here? In this specific case the "official dataset" the Address of the camping ("Aalbækvej 288 · DK-9982 Aalbæk", as seen on the website of the camping) doesn't seem to be contained in the official dataset or was not imported properly into OSM. Isn't an address on the outline better than no address at all?

2. Even if the address was already present in OSM as a point, isn't it still be a good idea to have the address information also on the POI itself (here: the camping site), so that a user that is searching for the camping can find out the official address of the business (e.g. for sending a letter to it).

3. And more generally: Isn't OpenStreetMap all about collaboration and starts with the principle that everyone can edit anything? What good is a dataset in OSM if you're not allowed to edit it? Couldn't it just have been left as an outside dataset in that case?
tyr_asd (2018-09-17 11:32:42+00:00): PS: correction for my point 1 above – https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/926004477 seems to be the address node for this. Sorry, I overlooked it at first. Still, the node doesn't contain any connection to the camping as a whole, so point 2 is still valid for this case.
atcomapper (2018-09-17 13:53:36+00:00): The problem when you add the address to the whole area is that routing software would not know where to physically guide you. Obviously when, for example, using your car GPS to drive to a camping site, if you enter the address for that camping site, you want to end up at the entrance. If your GPS is just told to route to anywhere on the site, you might end up in a completely wrong place where it is not possible to enter the camping site. In contrast, if you navigate to the actual address point, you will actually be guided to where you want to go.

Again, an address in Denmark is legally defined a a single point, not an area, so indicating in the GIS data that a certain address is a polygon is simply wrong.

If you want the camping site/address to be easier searchable, you can consider adding the appropriate tags directly to the address node.
ファシズム (2018-10-19 16:07:24+00:00): Bing is too old for mapping riverbanks!
Florimondable (2018-10-06 18:50:58+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez rajouté une piste cyclable sur la rue des Longues Raies.
êtes vous bien certains que c'est une piste séparé de la chaussé motorisé par un séparateur en dur et non pas un simple contre sens cyclable marqué de marquage vélo ?
Truchin (2018-10-19 13:15:49+00:00): Là je suis sûr que j'avais vérifié sur le terrain. Donc effectivement la contribution de Quentin doublonne les données existantes. Je supprime le way en question
Florimondable (2018-10-19 13:18:30+00:00): Merci.
Quentin Goulas (2018-10-20 07:38:25+00:00): D'accord merci de votre vigilance, je connais le quartier mais je n'avais effectivement pas vérifié
Truchin (2018-10-20 10:31:19+00:00): En réalité, la piste cyclable et le contresens cyclable étaient déjà existant dans les données OSM mais pas sur le way principal de la voie
mueschel (2018-09-22 12:57:06+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? It got some foreign tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625930111

Thanks, Jan
JeroenHoek (2018-09-23 07:00:25+00:00): Fixed. These were left over from the boundary source.

Thanks for noticing.
JeroenHoek (2018-09-16 10:28:10+00:00): Wat een lading adressen in een keer uit de BAG. Studentenkamers denk ik?
eggie (2018-09-16 11:24:44+00:00): I see you removed already the duplicates. All addresses in the Netherlands are imported from the Governments Kadaster.
Comfortably_numb (2018-09-17 08:16:38+00:00): Thanks eggie, good to know.
rskedgell (2018-09-16 16:15:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this to the map.
There doesn't really seem to be a good way to tag when dogs are allowed on beaches, although dog=yes should be OK for access all year round. My reading of the wiki page for leisure=dog_park is more for an area within a park etc. (and leisure_1=dog_park may not be picked up by data consumers). Perhaps it might be worth adding the tag website=https://www.torbay.gov.uk/leisure-sports-and-community/beaches/find-a-beach/babbacombe-beach/ as well, which might help people looking for dog-friendly beaches?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park