piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
katpatuka (2018-10-08 05:39:32+00:00): yes, they are optional but I find them useful. I'd changed the label to place=region for testing and that seems to have worked.
Pikse (2018-10-08 06:40:05+00:00): If place=region works in sense that it doesn't cause much trouble as it's "rarely used by data consumers" (quoting wiki) then I'm not contesting it. ;)

But still, out of curiousity, how is this useful? If object denoted by label node of the given relation area isn't really different from that of the admin_center node, then one of them as a relation member seems redundant to me.

Now that I think more it, two nodes also seem to be against the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" since despite different place=* values it still isn't clear what is the actual distinction between the two.
katpatuka (2018-10-08 08:29:39+00:00): Well, this is beyond my scope of interest and should rather be discussed under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:boundary#Label_role or a mailinglist. ;)
Pikse (2018-10-08 08:57:48+00:00): You mean other people also use these roles together in that way? Are there examples? I get it if one node role is for name of the given relation area and another is for townhall or some subentity of this settlement or something else different, but here this doesn't seem to be the case.
katpatuka (2018-10-08 10:20:33+00:00): Some renderers may use this feature... in #osm chat someone said most US counties have admin_centre and label...
Pikse (2018-10-08 10:40:54+00:00): Well, this is different. I checked some US counties and for their relations one node is for area (county) name and another is for county seat (settlement within county). For Xianning it seems that basically both nodes denote name of the same area, eventhough for some reason they use different roles.
Pikse (2018-10-08 10:50:03+00:00): Now that I check relation history I see that before this change node 5574966479 (amenity=townhall) was used in admin_center role for Xianning relation. So the question remains why was it better to duplicate the place label node and use that instead in this role, or in what is the current solution useful at all?
eggie (2018-09-15 14:49:55+00:00): Oke.. goede edit, maar bicycle=yes kan er weer af. het is immers een fietspad en bicycle is default
SomeoneElse (2018-09-16 10:21:54+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what source=snapp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5791580746/history means?
Best Regards,
Andy
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 14:12:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 14:11:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 14:12:06+00:00): не удаляйте объекты, если уточняете положение/размер
eggie (2018-09-15 14:48:25+00:00): Even ter lering ende vermaeck..
In editor iD zit een BUG. Je krijgt footeway=sidewalk er gratis bij. Graag weer weghalen.
gebouwen tekeken we niet zelf in OSM, maar het is import via het forum. 
Wanneer het is het Kadaster te vinden is kun je het laten importen. 
Kijk even of het in de BAG staat. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=vronen&resultOffset=0&objectId=0394300000001229&geometry.x=102937.781&geometry.y=474888.188&zoomlevel=4&detailsObjectId=0394300000001229
c2r (2018-09-15 09:10:54+00:00): I've removed this as it is a fantasy road added by the user - a link here is at the pre-planning consultation stage.
sskalyan (2019-09-11 08:26:11+00:00): Hi RickeFare,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625704844#map=14/42.0771/-71.7931 this trail added by you is going under many digitised streets and roads, causing duplicate issues. Kindly look into this issue. 

Thanks,
Kalyan.
chnav (2018-09-18 12:15:57+00:00): Путепровод находится в другом месте. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543486388
chnav (2018-09-18 12:16:09+00:00): Всё откатил.
Филиппок (2018-09-23 07:35:02+00:00): Это другой мостик на нём едут одновременно паравозы и машины.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 14:11:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
RicoElectrico (2018-09-15 16:29:31+00:00): Cześć, zmian na jednym małym obszarze (tutaj: parking i dojazd do niego) nie ma sensu wysyłać kawałek po kawałku w 5 zestawach zmian ;-)

Daje to tylko więcej roboty komuś, kto sprawdza edycje.

Inną sprawą jest dość ogólnikowy opis edycji. Lepsze by było np. "dodano wjazd na parking".

Polecam zapoznać się ze wskazówkami na tej stronie:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_practice
gileri (2018-09-18 20:12:47+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai de nouveau restauré cet objet en landuse=residential et non pas un building=residential. La zone n'est pas un seul bâtiment, mais une résidence avec plusieurs bâtiments.

Si vous le souhaitez n'hésitez pas à dessiner les bâtiments individuels, mais j'ai préféré attendre une mise à jour du cadastre afin d'avoir la forme exacte.
phd0 (2018-09-19 14:36:02+00:00): Bonjour, 
je vois en effet que les parcelle cadastre N° 68..100 sont marquées d'un point rouge, cela veut dire qu'elles ne sont plus d'actualité ?
ok, Mais je note qu'il vaux mieux travailler dans votre sens.
gileri (2018-09-20 21:24:29+00:00): Je ne vois pas de points rouge sur le cadastre : https://imgur.com/OTxcKfp

Mais je crois pas qu'il y ait d'indication particulières sur l'actualité des parcelles, elles sont juste mises à jour de temps en temps avec les nouvelles données
phd0 (2018-09-21 13:45:28+00:00): les points rouges sont sur le site officiel du cadastre. ces infos ne semble pas être absorbées par OSM
Supaplex (2018-09-15 08:34:46+00:00): Emergency相關宜放在學校上
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62604566
PT-53 (2019-05-13 08:10:31+00:00): Hallo  q_un_go,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625713725/history mit highway=construction neu eingezeichnet.
Wie weit ist denn die Baustelle bereits gediehen und wo gibt es dazu Infos?
Fragende Grüße
mueschel (2018-09-15 10:58:00+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "legal =motorroad"? What's wrong with the common motorroad = yes?

Jan
djakk (2018-09-16 09:49:56+00:00): Hello Jan ! Yes I've just figured out a new tagging scheme about legal classifications : in France, there is "motorroad", there is also "motorway", and nothing, which I call "classic". 
I thought it would be better than two keys, motorroad="yes" or "no", and motorway="yes" or "no". 
Did I removed some motorroad=yes ? :-\
mueschel (2018-09-16 10:04:50+00:00): Hi,
this scheme of motorroad / motorway / normal also exists in other places, and is exactly what motorroad = yes was invented for.
motorway-class has the tag highway=motorway.
motorroad-class has any highway tag plus motorroad=yes.
Everything else has just the motorway tag.

Changing a tagging scheme like this is a complicated thing, because e.g. all routers have to know about it and honor the implied access rules. 'motorroad' is wide-spread and well-understood.
djakk (2018-09-16 13:07:43+00:00): I don't want to suppress any information and mislead the existing tools, so I won't touch to the existing motorroad="yes" or "no" (except the one I added a few days ago then I've changed my mind). 
But yeah I want to evolve to a new tagging scheme : in France, and other european countries, legally there is motorway and also motorroad (the signs and the rules are not the same). 
There is also some weird case where the motorway is not a legally motorway (like "le Pont de la Mulatière" in Lyon : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16633841 - note the cycleway:right="yes") (old example actually : the whole motorway that crosses the center of Lyon is not legally a motorway anymore, but on the ground nothing changes, so it is still highway=motorway).
djakk (2018-09-16 13:12:43+00:00): Legal=motorway can also be used for "half-motorway" of Switzerland, where the local community have decided to tag highway="trunk" the motorway with one lane per direction : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227963967
mueschel (2018-09-22 11:23:15+00:00): I'd like to ask you to discuss this tagging scheme on the tagging mailing list before you start adding it on a large scale. It's always better to have several opinions on a topic before doing a lot of work others might not like.
atcomapper (2018-09-15 09:04:54+00:00): Du kan ikke bare sætte en hastighedsgrænse på en vej hvis der ikke er nogen. Vi skal kortlægge verden som den er, ikke finde på vores egne trafikregler.
Rakkka (2018-09-18 00:06:30+00:00): 建都イノベーションパークは見ての通り建設中で、航空写真に写っている建物は古い物です。
Tomas Straupis (2018-09-17 10:09:32+00:00): Jei pridedami name žymos vertimai (pvz. name:en), tai reikia pridėti ir name:lt, bet turi likti ir name (name reikšmė turi būti lygi name:lt reikšmei)
Agustin (2018-09-15 12:39:28+00:00): No es una calle, esa calle es diferente. Mira bien la foto y lo verás
Jordi MF (2018-09-17 00:03:15+00:00): Agustin, ¿a qué calle te refieres? Nombra el id de la vía ya que este changeset contiene muchas otras modificaciones.
bocadillodeatun (2018-09-17 06:27:56+00:00): Se refiere a la calle "Francisco Comes Martínez".
Resulta que había cerrado yo (equivocadamente) una nota suya.
Ahora hay una nueva nota suya (y un nuevo comentrio mío, pidiendo más información) en esa calle.
Myazyk (2018-09-15 15:19:44+00:00): Шось мені здається, що на пров Шахтарів, наприклад, дорога не ґрунтова, а був на ній шутер
olehz (2018-09-15 18:34:22+00:00): мені як і будь-якому іншому автомобілісту абсолютно похрен на кометичну наявність дрібного каміння на дорозі. від грунтовок такі дороги нічим особливо не відрізняються. а для глини і багнюки є окремий тег. наявніть гравія/шутера мала б зміст, якби за дорогою хтось слідкував, проходився періодично грейдером і посипав би то все. проте цього ніхто не робить. так само є купа доріг, на яких зустрічаються залишки стародавнього асфальту, проте вони зараз по факту також грунтовки. я лише одну дорогу в нашому регіоні знаю, яку можна позначити як гравійну (як з Цюхого Верху на Мразницю їхати, є поворот на нафтокачку нову). бачив років 5 тому. там глина і дощі, і вони нову технологію заюзали аби не змивало. на глину поклали якесь синтетичне полотно і згори то все присипали шаром гравію. на велосипеді по такій поверхні дуже незручно їхати, і таке позначати є сенс, а от епізодичні залишки асфальту чи шутер - ну його нафіг. сільські глиняні дороги, по яким грейдер пройшовся недавно на порядок кращі за ті колдойобини з тими залишками асфальту
catdreamer (2018-09-17 12:11:48+00:00): 大屯連峰自然文化景觀核心特別景觀區邊界線為何被改成path??
Ewen Hill (2018-09-15 23:55:10+00:00): Thanks for doing the updates Jacob.
Jan Wilts (2018-09-15 12:05:13+00:00): beide*
eugene-lisovskiy (2018-12-06 11:00:11+00:00): Привет! Я 3 месяца назад обнаружил проблему в названии бара Bad.Bro.Bar, у которого нарочито каждая первая буква "B" (би) английская написана как "В" (вэ) русская. Такое трудно сделать случайно, это какой-то осознанный шаг, похожий на вандализм. Не понимаю зачем так сделано, ибо в таком написании найти бар через поиск - невозможно, плюс в MAPS.ME срабатывает транслитератор и название выглядит как Vad.Vro.Var.
Почему ты откатил мое исправление и вернул написание с кирилической "В" (вэ)?
literan (2018-12-06 11:46:11+00:00): привет! глянул: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62548806/ - видимо, подумал ,что ты только продублировал уже имеющийся адрес фейсбука в некорректное поле website, потому и откатил. А эти моменты с кириллической-некириллической раскладкой не заметил) Сейчас сделаю!
literan (2018-12-06 11:50:46+00:00): Судя по deep history https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3893310160 - я сам и внес с кириллицей, но сознательно я так сделать не мог :) Копирнул или в Афише/вилладже из обзора новых кабаков, или у них из фейсбука...
eugene-lisovskiy (2018-12-06 12:08:33+00:00): Ок, понял :) ну да, наверное странно выглядела моя правка где с виду ничего не изменилось :) Поправь, пожалуйста. А бар отличный, кстати :)
Negreheb (2020-08-18 08:19:00+00:00): Servus waldhans, 

bisschen spät und mehr so interessehalber: Aber wie bist du zu den Adressen gekommen, die auf einer offenen Fläche liegen? Speziell hier beim Parkplatz vom Liedl sind zwei verschiedene, die wohl vor Ort so nicht ersichtbar sein dürften :)

Beste Grüße
waldhans (2020-08-18 09:43:54+00:00): Bahnhofstraße 1 ist der Lidl. Die einzige "freie" Adresse ist "Bahnhofstraße 1a", dort war mal ein Kiosk. Dieser wurde abgebaut, aber die Adresse ist weiterhin amtlich. Kannst du dir schnell mit dem NÖ Atlas ansehen oder, etwas aufwendiger, über das "   
Österreichisches Adressregister" des BEVM. Die Adresse 1a ist immer noch amtlich!
Horza (2018-09-15 11:04:37+00:00): 11460 Lancer Way, 11460 Glenn Mottin Way North. I didn't think that was possible with the American number system
zvenzzon (2020-11-06 18:52:53+00:00): Är du säker på name vs old_name? 

https://www.svenskakyrkan.se/ahl/ahls-kyrka

(Har inte varit på plats själv och undersökt saken.)
Essin (2020-12-12 09:45:41+00:00): Det var redan vid https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14736980 som jag lade in name= och old_name= och jag minns inte exakt hur jag tänkte då, även om "Insjöns kyrka" som det stod tidigare förstås är fel. Jag tror att jag redan då använde mig av Ekonomiska kartan, som stavar utan h https://kartbild.com/#16/60.6822/15.1001/0x1 (vilket även Topografiska kartan gör), antagligen i enlighet med de principer för "god ortnamnssed" som beskrivs i https://www.lantmateriet.se/contentassets/41a7acabed464c519755771a3b760b84/ortnamn-och-namnvard_nr6.pdf (sidorna 25 och 51-53 handlar specifikt om församlingar). Det här är kanske ett fall där lokalbefolkningen inte är överens med Lantmäteriet? Jag har inte heller varit framme vid kyrkan utan bara läst och hört om den. Det skulle vara intressant att veta hur det stavas på vägskyltarna, men Mapillary verkar krångla just nu.
Essin (2021-01-20 19:05:24+00:00): Nu funkar Mapillary och där står det faktiskt Åhls kyrka (eller "Åhl k:a" på ett ställe). Eftersom Trafikverket och församlingen verkar vara överens satte jag den stavningen som name= enligt Tag what's on the ground, och stavningen utan h som alt_name=.
zvenzzon (2021-04-12 07:23:55+00:00): Såg igår att det är skyltat "Åhls kyrka" vid Timmervägen, så allt verkar bra taggat nu.
Carto'Cité (2018-09-24 09:05:45+00:00): Le tag motor_vehicle=bus n'a pas de sens à ma connaissance. Pourquoi l'utilises-tu ? Peux-tu s'il te plaît me pointer la page du wiki qui recommande et explique son utilisation ?
Merci d'avance.
Charles de Carto’Cité
frosm (2018-09-15 11:29:08+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap.
pouis-je vous inviter à lancer le tutoriel pour apprendre les bases ?
car un objet avec juste un nom serra ignoré par la majorité des applications osm et serra invisible sur le carte
je m'étonne aussi qu'il y ai des chambres d’hôtes en plein champs, manque-t-il un bâtiment ou l'objet est-il mal placé ?
Almtesh (2018-09-16 09:13:46+00:00): Oui, il manquait des bâtiments que je viens d'ajouter (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62630061). C'est à deux mètres d'un bâtiment, c'est donc presque bien placé.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-16 08:22:53+00:00): Any idea how https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625740884/history (1 v1 object) got source=snapp on it?
Best Regards,
Andy
wambacher (2018-09-16 12:25:07+00:00): No idea, andy. 

i usually don't change WAY attributes exept admin_level & sometimes boundary=administrative.

But I know "snapp" from the IRAN, because snapp is currently causing big problems there. if you need more infos pls. contact me via mail.

walter
eggie (2018-09-15 14:09:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-09-15 14:12:50+00:00): Dirk.. graag concreet aangeven wat je veranderingen zijn. 
Bij een pitch geef je aan om welke sport het gaat bv sport=soccer en een school krijgt altijd de tag amenity=school
Ga je het aanpassen?  Graag reactie
eggie (2018-09-15 14:19:00+00:00): amenity school toegevoegd.
streinger (2018-09-15 13:18:24+00:00): *геометрии
aharvey (2018-09-16 05:14:21+00:00): the footway=sidewalk tag is for footpaths along side a road, it doesn't look like these are...
jakecopp (2018-09-16 07:29:50+00:00): Thanks very much, fixed. I missed the difference between "Footpath" and "Foot Path" in ID editor. I'll do more reading up on path types.
bartholemeu (2018-09-17 00:09:19+00:00): Very nice! i had just noticed last week that there is a lot of unmapped features in this area, and was wondering what the deal was! I'l try and add a bit more with my notes when i get a chance
jakecopp (2018-09-19 07:55:15+00:00): Cheers :)
sorcrosc (2018-09-15 12:54:50+00:00): Ciao.
Non è possibile utilizzare Google Maps come fonte di dati perché non consentito dal copyright. Per favore leggi "Violazione del copyright" qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
Carlos Brys (2018-10-02 14:08:17+00:00): No se ven los edificios en las imágenes satelitales.
Existen realmente ?
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 14:11:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Владимир К (2018-09-26 20:15:26+00:00): Здравствуйте!
В покемонов играете?
eggie (2018-09-15 14:32:13+00:00): Je verwijdert de gegevens van het Kadaster van de kaart. mag ik vragen om welke reden?
eggie (2018-09-15 14:41:17+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=bauwemalaan%2021&resultOffset=0&objectId=1651200000033963&geometry.x=246741.46840052&geometry.y=604798.2765982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1651010000023964
Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. Niet zomaar adressen verwijderen. Voor het kadaster heeft alles een adres.
eggie (2018-09-15 14:43:33+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #62613716
Graag reactie. Kijk ook eens op het forum dan ontdek je een beetje wat de regels zijn binnen OSM.
Je kun jezelf evt. voorstellen in het draadje welkom. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
GerdP (2018-11-10 08:23:21+00:00): Hi! What is meant with highway=truck?
Was it a typo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625763303
M!dgard (2018-09-15 14:55:15+00:00): Full disclosure: I salvaged my fixes that were not "removing line=substation" in https://osm.org/changeset/62613792 . The line=substation is still there.
ianlopez1115 (2018-09-15 14:29:41+00:00): offset used is/was -5.08; -3.88
carnevalem (2018-09-15 15:14:49+00:00): Also resolves: openstreetmap.org/note/1099737
M!dgard (2018-09-15 14:54:07+00:00): This is a technically a reversion of https://osm.org/changeset/62612995, but I re-added the (in my view still pointless) tag "line=substation", so the net result now is only non controversial fixes to power infrastructure around the world.
muralito (2018-09-16 01:11:27+00:00): You did not add them, but anyway, "161kV transmission line" is not a name.
M!dgard (2018-09-17 10:25:40+00:00): Yes, that's very true :p

Seems to have been introduced in https://osm.org/changeset/15177330
R0bst3r (2018-09-17 06:35:39+00:00): Hallo Jannis23,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Diese Änderung des Weges hätte ich allerdings nicht gemacht, kann man aber so machen.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62613896
Horza (2018-09-16 12:40:49+00:00): Hi! Welcome to Open Street Map. Nice to see more people mapping around here :)
Vincent de Phily (2018-09-15 21:06:02+00:00): Honestly I'm tempted to just reverse these two changesets (cf discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62314751), but there's no point in doing that without a discussion :

1) Looks like you used unaligned Bing imagery, which is off by a significant amount in this area. I'll let you check the wiki for an alignment tutorial, but straight away you can use the box_junction just east of the campus. Also check the other aerial imagery, as Bing isn't the best around here.

2) I you use imagery that's aligned differently from the imagery of the previous contributor, at least make make sure nearby objects are aligned relative to one another (here like you touched the parking object but nothing else, which creates visible inconsistencies).

3) Do not glue areas to ways as this is geometrically incorrect. It's ok to do that for a quick initial mapping, but not ok to do that to previously correct geometry.

4)  You might disagree with this one since this is the main change you made, but the parking area covers areas that are not really parking (and misses one that is, due to alignment). To me the he clearest example is the sides of the north building, which are lined by a service road and no parking spaces. Another one I'd cut out is the very south, for the same reason. And the bit of parking at the west is pretty naturally separated from the rest.

To be clear, I wouldn't have bothered with that 4th paragraph if this was the initial version of the car park. It's not as detailed as it could be, but it's correct. But the previous version was more detailed and also correct. You threw away mapped details, and I don't really see a positive. It's one thing to simplify the OSM data structures (overnodded ways, nodes that should be glued, ways that should be combined, etc), but it's another to simplify OSM's description of the reality.
RathcooleRambler (2018-09-17 17:38:21+00:00): The amount of parking spaces you had was outrageous. In total, I counted eight. While you could argue for the two adjacent to building two (way 623116760) and three, I see no reason for any of the other choices. The decision to create a parking area to the left of the service road in the large lot, for instance, or the decision to create two small parking lots on the right side of the large area, were illogical to me. Go to any other parking area and you'll almost definitely see one larger parking area.
Vincent de Phily (2018-09-20 21:24:21+00:00): Please keep your outrage for serious matters. Along with terms like butchering, this makes the conversation toxic and is not a good way to interact with other contributors. It took me some time and a chat with other OSMers before being able to give you this calm reply.

I won't try to give more arguments about the benefits and validity of detailed maping. Maybe you'll realize them yourself when overall map quality has improved in Belfast, and I wish you good luck working towards that goal.

In the meantime, I'll leave that car park as a single way and just fix the alignment and glueing issues.

Cheers.
Hjart (2018-09-16 08:26:54+00:00): Hvad skal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625779872 forestille at være?
Almtesh (2018-09-16 09:17:19+00:00): Salut,
Qu'est-ce qu'il faut vérifier dans ce groupe de modifications ?
pguillot (2018-09-16 15:46:41+00:00): Salut,

La route reste de même largeur et pavée mais n'est plus accessibles à la circulation. Je préférais donc avoir un avis extérieur du fait que c'est la première fois que je réalise ce genre de modification.
Almtesh (2018-09-16 17:27:18+00:00): Oui, donc, en effet, c'est la bonne modification.
mavl (2018-11-08 03:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64272210 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].