piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-02-12 21:41:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
StephaneP (2020-02-21 13:35:44+00:00): Bonjour GregouZX3,

L'Avenue Ardouin ne me parait pas très large pour ajouter une piste cyclable tout en conservant les 2 voies de circulation. Il s'agit bien d'une piste (séparée des voitures), ou bien juste d'une bande (peinture au sol) ?
J'ai cherché sur le site de la commune, mais je n'ai pas trouvé d'info.

Merci d'avance,

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
GregouZX3 (2020-02-22 11:43:10+00:00): Bonjour Stéphane,

Il s'agit bien d'une piste cyclable double sens séparée des voitures. Celles-ci circulent toujours a double-sens.
En voici une photo :
https://imgur.com/a/ql985xv
Il y avait des places de parking tout le long de cette partie de l'avenue (Av de l'Europe jusqu'au ton point).
Étonnant que la commune n'a rien dit car ce changement est significatif.

Bien à vous

 GregouZX3
StephaneP (2020-02-24 14:09:17+00:00): Merci pour la réponse, et en plus avec une photo, top !!!!
Il ne faut pas hésiter à en mettre sur Mapillary (des photos).

A bientôt

Stéphane
opendcc (2020-02-13 04:37:54+00:00): Hallo,

Gebäudenamen nur, wenn es wirklich der herausragende und bekannte Name ist: 'Schneefernerhaus, Hofbräuhaus'. Hier ist ein Imbiss, der sollte nur als einzelner Punkt (POI) getagged werden. Vorteil: manche Kartenausleitungen erlauben das ein/abblenden von POIs - und wenn ich dringend einen Zahnarzt suche, dann interessiert mich der Imbiss nicht.

Servus Wolfgang
citro (2020-02-13 07:47:52+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,

Danke für die Antwort, die Imbisshütte war schon als solche eingetragen, ich werde sie demnächst in einen Punkt POI umwandeln.

Gruß
Hans
Ps: ich hätte noch eine Frage zu OSMand. Kann ich das hier diskutieren, oder ist der Thtead hier öffentlich ?
opendcc (2020-02-13 07:55:05+00:00): Hallo,

hier ist so halb öffentlicher Raum (es ist die Diskussion zu diesem Changeset, kann man einsehen, verschwindet aber auf Dauer in den Untiefen der Datenbank (und belastet diese). Hier geht es nur um den Changeset. OSMand usw. bitte auf forum.openstreetmap.org diskutieren.

Servus
citro (2020-02-13 08:21:50+00:00): Ok,
Im OSM Forum wurden schon Anfragen zu Osmand auf ein dazugehöriges Forum verwiesen, falls es das noch gibt. Das Thema waren Blitzer

Grüße
Akkurator (2020-02-17 00:10:58+00:00): Hallo Sieghard,

Erstmal willkommen bei OSM! Schön, dass du zur freien Weltkarte mit beiträgst.
Wichtig ist, dass jeder in die Datenbank nur verlässliche Informationen einträgt, keine Vermutungen.
Du hast hier dem Weg, der quer über den Marktplatz führt, den Namen "Herrenstrasse" gegeben, und dem Weg quer über den Postplatz den Namen "Saumarkt".
Auf welcher Grundlage geschah das? Du hast "Survey" angegeben, also Prüfung vor Ort. Stehen dort entsprechende Schilder?

Und: es heißt "Straße", nicht "Strasse"

Bitte um Antwort bzw. Korrektur.

Grüße, Akkurator.
Akkurator (2020-02-29 15:15:52+00:00): Revert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80925453
abakus_uploader (2020-02-12 23:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-02-13 04:57:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=.... Please use building=yes. Please notice also the difference between description and name. If there is a bank inside of the building please add the tag amenity=bank. If you need help: You are welcome.
user_5359 (2020-02-13 05:00:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2498876428/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way.I move the node back to the original position.
eggie (2020-02-12 23:06:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-12 23:21:01+00:00): Prima actie.... 
De kruising heb ik wel wat aangepast.
Gr eggie
Carnildo (2020-02-13 07:44:31+00:00): Looks good to me.  The building was mapped back in 2008, and even the oldest imagery shows a parking lot.  I'd say it was demolished a long time ago.
Jessica12345 (2020-02-13 19:20:24+00:00): Thanks! I'm not sure I'm even able to get to that location without a good reason to check.
viloan (2020-02-12 23:02:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
archie (2020-02-14 00:08:16+00:00): Hi, you have not been active for quite some years, Welcome back! What's the meaning of this edit?
mapman44 (2020-02-13 02:19:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please note that the tag "residential building" should be applied to the building only, and in this instance it is normally tagged as a "building:house".  Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80926319
user_5359 (2020-02-13 04:47:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I repair your building problem...
user_5359 (2020-02-13 04:27:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-02-14 02:01:40+00:00): Hi Sopedaddy and welcome to OSM :)

There's quite a few instances of Wright Park at this location now (I count at least 4 at a glance) are they are the same park?

Typically we try to keep to the rule of "One feature, one OSM element": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element"

Maybe these should all be updated to one area?
freebeer (2020-02-13 06:49:33+00:00): hoi ian,

can you tell if this is actually a house and not some random farm building, as aerials lead me to believe the eastern-most of the three buildings would be the house, this roof missing the characteristics of a residence, having been selectively added by a persistent fantasy mapper.

thanks
iandees (2020-02-13 14:14:56+00:00): I switched it to building=yes and added some other buildings nearby in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80962440.
eggie (2020-02-13 08:39:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip... Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus het je adressen verschoven en op een andere plaats in Arnhem gelegd. Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn. Probeer ook bedrijven direct op de adresnodes bij te taggen.
Hier je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=80927191
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-13 08:54:11+00:00): Adressen hersteld.. info verplaatst naar adresnode
abakus_uploader (2020-02-13 23:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-02-13 04:24:32+00:00): In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
abakus_uploader (2020-02-13 23:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GOwin (2020-03-11 13:08:13+00:00): Hi @Oslec

From what imagery was this road, "Gines Viejo to Man-it Diversion Road" based on?

Or is this a planned, proposed road?
Oslec (2020-03-17 04:50:56+00:00): Its from from gps tracks while biking around Passi City its a new road that bypass Passi city proper.
Oslec (2020-03-17 05:01:10+00:00): CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE ROAD OF BRGY. GINES VIEJO TO BRGY. MAN - IT ROAD IN SUPPORT OF SUGAR MILL INDUSTRY, PASSI CITY, ILOILO, STA. 000 + 000 - STA. 000 + 613.85 & STA. 000 + 820 - STA. 001 + 406.15 Source: DPWH website
GOwin (2020-03-17 06:11:45+00:00): Great! Thanks for sharing. 

Just to confirm, the construction is already complete, and the road is open for public use?
Oslec (2020-03-17 06:23:35+00:00): Its almost complete, only a part at Brgy Gemat-y which is one lane. A building exist on the other lane. Its already open for public.
GOwin (2020-03-17 06:41:59+00:00): Have you tried uploading your GPX track, so we can help improve the road geometry?

If you're familiar with Mapillary, it would be nice to have street-level imagery since aerial imagery takes quite a while to update.

Thank you again for your contribution.
Oslec (2020-03-17 07:41:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Oslec/traces/3247528
GOwin (2020-03-17 08:27:05+00:00): Daghang salamat.
kartonage (2020-02-13 08:57:10+00:00): Hej Omotesando,

I'll point out that I have already raised concerns with raising secondary and B-classified roads in Mauritius to primary here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80467555

I will extend this by asking specifically: How do the Apple Project contributors determine road classification? Is there some sort of documentation available internally? On what basis is this decided? 
user 'sjdvda' changed it to secondary some months ago according to the RDA and I would generally agree with the notion. The B9 doesn't really connect Souillac and Grand Rivière Noire and the villages in between are somewhat outlying.

It doesn't really fit with the sizes of villages in Mauritius nor with the OSM definition of primary. So it's hard to understand why this classification is supposed to be right.

Best regards
cartorhythm (2020-02-15 01:50:17+00:00): We follow local classification guidelines and things like the Highway Tag Africa page, when applicable. When local guidelines do not exist we follow the global classification guidelines and whatever trend exists in the country. I talked to sjdvda via private message before this changeset was made. 

I think that different reasoning needs to be used in Mauritius because it is a relatively small island: what is a primary road in the US or Germany will not be the same as a primary road in an isolated road network. The B9 seems to be the most important road that travels through this area of Mauritius. 

Let me know what you think. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Values
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
archie (2020-02-13 09:45:55+00:00): Hi, you have not been active for quite some years, Welcome back! What's the meaning of this edit?
muralito (2020-02-13 12:46:57+00:00): Hola Ivanmoyano.

Tené en cuenta la regla de "One Element, One Feature".

La reserva la podes mapear etiquetando en la relación (que parece lo mas conveniente si esta formada por predios no contiguos) pero no simultáneamente etiquetando lo mismo en el limite.
MerlinPendragon (2020-02-13 02:37:01+00:00): If you don't mind my asking, what were your sources for these edits? In many cases, your "improved" building geometries are simply wrong, most notably Jones Tower and Scott House. In other cases, like Blackburn House and Torres House, the buildings are now far too close to the walkways.
Figgy_c (2020-02-13 14:25:46+00:00): Thanks, yes, I used the National Agriculture Imagery Program data for a few of those as it was the newest I could find, since this area is a new build. I'm in this area often as well. I will take another look.
Figgy_c (2020-02-13 14:27:11+00:00): edit: i see you also know way more about campus than I do so I certainly defer to your experience
Mike Raust (2020-07-09 12:29:46+00:00): A lot of the buildings from your import came broken from Microsoft: e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688785989
( from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70055687 )
floridaeditor (2020-02-15 13:19:46+00:00): An expressway only has few traffic lights and intersections. I agree between Old Daytona Road and Indian Lake Road being trunk, but otherwise clearly primary.
nevw (2020-02-13 03:58:00+00:00): Hi
welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
Please use the full name instead of abbreviations.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
Also you appear to have deleted some footways that can be seen in satellite imagery. Are you intending to re-draw these with more accuracy? The history is lost when items are deleted so it is good practice to shift the existing nodes of items that another user has mapped if possibly to improve the map.
tuxayo (2020-02-13 03:00:32+00:00): errata: source: cadastre DGI
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:21:48+00:00): Hi, why you tagged this track with access=no?
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:50:23+00:00): reverted
andi9876 (2020-02-16 07:42:08+00:00): Hi, may better delete tracks like this? Access=no not make sense.
tux67 (2020-02-13 14:28:45+00:00): With this Changeset you connected 2 public roads via a potentially private property. This may lead to routing software sending cars this way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80931080
pjij (2020-02-14 10:19:24+00:00): Hi tux67,
Thanks for looking into my edit. Didn't change the access tag of the road as there were no gates, street side or point/building data to determine the road access.  Currently, we are in slight ambiguity of  adding customer and private access, however we continuously thrives to improve our edits from the community suggestions. So, we haven't added any access tag in this case restraining the bad edits. Could you please suggest how to add private access in these scenario. We are looking forward for the community suggestions to improve the edit quality.
Regards
pjij
tux67 (2020-02-14 12:00:27+00:00): Hi - as a general rule of the thumb I would say that whenever you connect with a service road 2 major (named) roads, there is a significant probability (in scenarios like we see here) that you are crossing private Ground. In Germany the owner usually allows  access to clients and delivery service  , but not to the greater public (even without a gate or a fence or a sign)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80931080
pjij (2020-02-17 11:11:11+00:00): Hi tux67 ,
We understand that there is a significant possibility of missing the private roads, like this case. We previously received feedback from community in form of comments for adding private roads in the situation like this (Linkage of 2 or more major roads). However, in most of scenarios where we are unable to decide the private access with our available resources. So, we are improving the access tags based on the comments received by the community (local knowledge). Do let me know the suggested modifications in this scenario.

Regards
pjij
tux67 (2020-02-17 11:57:07+00:00): In this case and in general, where you are in doubt vehicle=destination might be an option to at least avoid unwanted traffic on the added segment.
pjij (2020-02-18 05:58:33+00:00): Hi tux67 ,
Thanks for your time for checking back my edit. Please find the changeset (81150983) for the suggested modifications. We will take this as  a feedback to improve our editing etiquette.

Regards
pjij
k_zoar (2020-02-13 03:39:15+00:00): 変更セットの情報を修正し忘れました｡
comment: 川越市下小阪付近-基盤地図情報より建物トレース
source: GSI/KIBAN 2500; GSImaps/seamlessphoto
が正しい情報です｡
archie (2020-02-13 09:46:46+00:00): Hi, you have not been active for quite some years, Welcome back! What's the meaning of this edit?
Mehmet arap (2020-02-13 20:41:16+00:00): Hello. I checked if it still works
tux67 (2020-02-13 14:26:26+00:00): Hi,
irgend ein tieferer Hintergrund den alten Lidl zu löschen (und damit die History)? Der Parkplatz überlappt jetzt mit dem Gebäude.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80932404
Polarbear (2020-05-15 20:55:32+00:00): Du wurdest hier bereits gebeten, die History von Objekten nicht zu löschen, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Leider machst du das immer wieder: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/83813753
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-15 15:47:42+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81046604
ralley (2020-02-13 05:25:25+00:00): Review as requested: Edit looks good to me, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80934522
compdude (2020-02-19 06:37:41+00:00): These roads should not be tagged as motorways. The motorway tag is only for roads that are actually freeways, like I-5. Please change them back to how they were tagged before (highway=unclassified). Thanks!
Spairrow (2020-04-22 12:53:49+00:00): Sorry for the late response, changed them back as soon as i could. Needed it change it to motorway temporarily for vehicle testing purposes.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 22:35:39+00:00): Hello Spairrow ,
Just to be clear, OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it really is.  If you'd like to experiment with how something that uses OSM data works when you feed it a motorway instead of an unclassified road, then please take a copy of OSM data and use that instead.  If you'd like help with how to do that, please ask.
It's not fair to change something in a shared map to a motorway for your personal testing, as it means that everyone's data is wrong while your doing that.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 17:48:53+00:00): here you added ways that doesnt existe and also breaked restrictions
KazakhSteppe (2020-06-12 00:40:11+00:00): Are you referring to the changes here? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/-5.044649158865457/-42.81073330937601

The dual carriageway was created and turn restrictions broken by a different user in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80220683
Baloo Uriza (2020-02-15 23:43:19+00:00): You extended ramp 26B *well* past the end of the ramp.  Please don't do this, transition and lane change restrictions should be mapped in the lane tagging.
Baloo Uriza (2020-02-15 23:43:59+00:00): You also ignored the placement=middle_of:1 tagging by moving the ramp to the ramp centerline, this is also wrong.  The placement tagging handles the offset.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:49:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 16:44:25+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10706469 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Pt873 (2021-05-05 18:07:34+00:00): Olá, não consegui identificar a qual restrição específica você se refere. Entretanto, até onde me lembro, inseri restrições apenas onde há sinalização para tais. Ficarei atento ao que você disse, obrigado.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 22:18:27+00:00): Olá,

é esta restrição:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10706469
Pt873 (2021-05-06 21:10:03+00:00): De fato, considerando a orientação que você deu, não está certo. Já fiz a correção na restrição, obrigado pelo alerta, não repetirei em futuras edições.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-06 21:15:54+00:00): Olá,

muito obrigado pelo retorno e bons mapeamentos