piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Recoil16 (2019-11-17 18:29:06+00:00): Hallo kreuzschnabel, 
Danke für deine Arbeit hier!
Du hast beim Aufteilen der Burger Straße in zwei Ways wie es scheint jedoch vergessen, an den westwärts führenden Ways die Anzahl der lanes entsprechend zu ändern. Habe das entsprechend in CS 77196329 nachgebessert.
Viele Grüße
Moritz
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-17 19:14:31+00:00): Danke. Ich hoffe, bei den Relationen hab ich richtig getroffen – da kann man manchmal nur raten, in welche Richtung sie gehen :) aber die Kreuzung schien mir gestern beim Drüberfahren so breit, dass ein Separatmapping sie besser abbildet.
Chetan_Gowda (2019-11-17 07:40:10+00:00): SG OSM community, please review my changeset for ground truth, would be good to double check. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
chris66 (2022-10-03 19:26:29+00:00): Neues Tagging fuer Packstationen: anenity=parcel_locker.
Dimacn (2019-11-19 18:59:16+00:00): Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM:  Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите парк во дворе.
Dimacn (2019-11-17 18:56:39+00:00): Если речь идёт про спутниковые снимки, то лучше Maxar, они самые свежие.
attili1 (2019-11-19 01:12:55+00:00): Hi andrew_meower,

I'm from Grab Data team, while mapping in Singapore, we came across a few of your edits, where one way tag has been removed for all the motorway exits on ECP expressway and also classification has been modified  from motorway_link to primary _link.

Link segments on expressways will always be unidirectional, for reference check street level imagery and lane markings as well.

Refer osm wiki guidelines for  classification hierarchy [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OpenStreetMap_Highway_links_table_between_different_highway_types..png]

Can you help us understand the reason/ source you have used for the edits.

Thanks,
attili1
Gregory Peony (2025-10-08 23:17:46+00:00): [ENG] Hi, I see it's been a while since you mapped this, but did you actually know that the buildings you mapped in this area are houses or were you just using aerial imagery? You enveloped multiple buildings in individual footprints, so I'm trying to figure out how to tag the individual buildings.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 09:39:24+00:00): Can you explain why you have deleted `landuse=` and `=footway`?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77182696
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 09:40:41+00:00): Can you explain why you have deleted `landuse=` and `=footway`?
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:58:53+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
UNmapper_mtola (2019-12-09 15:50:34+00:00): Dear g2mcab. Add tags only to the way that are part of the polygon. Do not tag the nodes that are part of the polygon (as it was in object 6984307320). I go to correct them. Cheers
pyrog (2020-08-30 12:00:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Le DAE est ajouté fait doublon avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6857367620

Cordialement,

__
Yves
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 09:39:36+00:00): Can you explain why you have deleted `landuse=` and `=footway`?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77183006
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 09:42:28+00:00): Sorry wrong comment.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 09:44:27+00:00): 1. Please be careful with extending `footway=crossing` ways. They should be split to `footway=sidewalk` on sidewalk.
2. I don't know what imagery or geo-location you are using, but after orthogonalizing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682276230/history, you need to align the island back.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-12 07:15:11+00:00): Hi, I fixed a mistake with the power pole you accidentally moved here: 92332020
ma-rt-in (2019-11-18 18:50:24+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir da tatsächlich sicher mit der änderung. Im Esri Bild sieht man etwas nördlicher wenig bewuchs und da meine ich einen Wirtschaftsweg zu erkennen.
oudalricus (2019-11-18 18:57:31+00:00): Hallo! Ja, ich bin mir sicher. Ich bin den Weg gestern abgelaufen. Er ist meist nicht breiter als 50 cm und definitiv nicht von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen befahrbar.
ma-rt-in (2019-11-18 19:00:23+00:00): alles klar, danke für die info.
Glassman (2019-11-17 18:50:22+00:00): According to the counties property map there is not park in this area. See https://scopi.snoco.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?configBase=https://scopi.snoco.org/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/SCOPI/viewers/SCOPI/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/Default Can you provide some verification that this is a park? Otherwise it looks like natural=wood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77183454
Corvid (2019-11-18 03:12:08+00:00): Unfortunately, I made several changes to a couple different areas in that area and I'm not sure which you're referring to. And, the snoco link you've sent shows the whole county and doesn't zoom into a specific address.

Could you tell me the nearest street to the edit you're concerned with?

In the future, I should probably keep changes in a particular area/feature and submit before moving to another area. Would this be helpful when reviewing? Is this what you'd recommend?

Thanks!
Glassman (2019-11-18 06:17:04+00:00): Here is a link to the park you added. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746317926#map=18/47.89454/-122.17593

I tend to keep my edits in one small geographical area, but will add unrelated features. Once you get more used to editing it will become business as usual. 

We watch parks because of a game that likes to see parks. People have even added them to their back yard.
Corvid (2019-11-18 06:53:50+00:00): Thanks for the link!  

Before adding that park area, I had noticed there was a park area already near there with a footpath running through it, south of 114th Pl SE. North of 114th is also a maintained (grass is mowed, trees and shrubs are trimmed, etc.) area that continues to flank the footpath with a small playground and benches.
chnav (2019-11-25 13:33:09+00:00): Вычищена реклама из поля name
BlogCraft (2019-11-18 19:14:43+00:00): All this changes are Wrong using outdated imagery Bing has a 10 year obsolete images.
Denise Merchuk (2019-11-19 08:17:42+00:00): Hi BlogCraft, 

Thank you for your message, and sorry for the inconvenience. I'd like to fix all the wrong editions I did. Can you help me with that?

Thanks,
Denise
marczoutendijk (2019-11-19 10:13:48+00:00): Reverted by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77266673

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
mbethke (2019-11-17 18:47:59+00:00): Hi,
sorry, but have you ever visited those places? There's absolutely no way this could be called a forest by any stretch of the imagination. There are hardly any plants more than a meter high except for a few reeds. I'll just revert his, eh?

cheers,
Matthias
Emilkhon (2019-11-17 19:09:12+00:00): Hi,
Yes, i have been living in Vientiane. It would be much more sensible to tag it grass. There are some not so tall trees on Hat donchan. Laotians use it as a framland and have built some houses on it.  Some parts of Hat donchan gets flooded during rainy season
mbethke (2019-11-18 02:32:10+00:00): Oh, you're right, there are even a few trees :) But still, like in some other places in the city, a bunch of trees on a small city plot is not quite a forest. landuse=farmland would probably be the best classification, with seasonal=dry_season I guess?
I've left it alone, feel free to fix.
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:06:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:09:31+00:00): Dag kktb,

Vaak is eenrichtingsverkeer niet van toepassing voor fietsers en/of brommers.
Is dat hier ook het geval ?
Zo ja, dan kun je nog toevoegen:
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
oneway:moped=no
abakus_uploader (2019-11-17 23:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
apm-wa (2020-03-29 01:10:57+00:00): You are right, this cannot be an embassy, the embassy is in Bogota.  It is also not a consulate since the U.S. government has no consulates in Colombia, only the embassy.
user_5359 (2020-01-05 17:07:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you add a bridge, please don't delete the key highway, this is also needed.  I will repair the situation.
Carto'Cité (2019-11-20 14:07:04+00:00): Salut ZZ,
Dans ce changeset je vois des way supprimé pour être remplacé par leurs équivalents. Par exmple (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741972939) remplacé par lui (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746815353). Dis moi si je comprends mal cette contribution :)
Charles
ZZ29 (2019-11-20 14:10:32+00:00): Hello, j'imagine que c'est la fusion de deux chemins continus, qui contiennent des relations bus.
Il y a un impact?
ZZ29 (2019-11-20 14:12:04+00:00): La v1 n'est pas de moi dans l'exemple ?
Carto'Cité (2019-11-20 14:39:32+00:00): Ça ne semble justement pas venir d'une fusion et non la V1 n'est pas de toi. Non ça n'a pas d'impact mais je pose la question parce que normalement ce n'est pas la pratique de supprimer si il n'y a pas une bonne raison... mais en pratique ça bruite un peu la surveillance qu'on effectue sur les données ; c'est aussi pour ça que je suis curieux de savoir à quel moment ce genre d'événement survient :)
Charles
BCNorwich (2019-11-17 14:39:44+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if you have the correct street, if not could you please amend it.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-11-20 07:34:03+00:00): Hi, it's really a good practice to acknowledge that comments have been noticed and acted upon, or not acted upon as the case maybe.
We're all after making the best map possible and should be working together to achieve this.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-11-17 14:40:44+00:00): Hi could you please check the street name. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2019-11-20 07:34:51+00:00): Hi, Thanks for making the correction.
Regards Bernard.
Markey9 (2019-11-20 08:17:34+00:00): First time of trying, so moving slowly to practice
tux67 (2019-11-17 11:48:36+00:00): Hallo NikPaulussen,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Bitte Wege nicht einfach löschen, sonderen mit einem lifecyclepräfix versehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:abandoned:
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst. Aber beim Hochladen auch immer die Quelle deines Wissens angeben.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77186105
tux67 (2019-11-17 11:53:06+00:00): p.s.: Dein Änderungssatz wurde zurückgesetzt und entsprechend aktualisiert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77186105
Nik- (2019-11-17 16:48:09+00:00): Hi tux67,

danke für deine Antwort. Die Aufgabe der Präfixe war mir bis jetzt noch nicht komplett bewusst, jetzt macht das alles etwas mehr Sinn. :D

Ich meine, eine Quelle hätte ich angegeben als "Grundstücksbesitzer". Diese Angabe kommt daher, dass ein Teil meiner Familie das Grundstück besitzt und ich regelmäßig dort spazieren gehe, sodass ich mit 100% Sicherheit sagen kann, dass es diesen Weg nicht mehr gibt.

Es gibt noch ein paar andere veralteten Daten in der Umgebung, diese werde ich mir demnächst dann auch mal vornehmen. Danke für deine Antwort und den Change!

Nik
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:15:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-11-17 14:18:08+00:00): Dag appie... surface=gravel is eigenlijk onfietsbaar. (Grove steenslag)  Vaak ligt op dit soort paden kleine korrels gravel en wordt dan getagd als surface=fine_gravel. Dit wordt in fietskaarten als min of meer verhard gezien. 
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=77186109
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-17 14:34:59+00:00): Even gespiekt.., maar gravel zou hier ook goed kunnen. 
eggie
BlogCraft (2019-11-18 19:24:02+00:00): All this changes are also Wrong using outdated imagery Bing has a 10 year obsolete images.

This is Vandalism
marczoutendijk (2019-11-18 20:36:25+00:00): Please note that the correct use of the construction tag is:
building=construction
construction=terminal
The current tagging looks like if the terminal is already finished and in use.
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction
Denise Merchuk (2019-11-19 08:18:30+00:00): Hi BlogCraft and Marc, 

Thank you for your messages. I'm so sorry for the inconvenience. I'd like to fix all the wrong editions I did. Can you help me with that?

Thanks,
Denise
marczoutendijk (2019-11-19 09:59:25+00:00): For now:
Don't try to fix anything yourself. I'll try it with JOSM reverter. 
If other people alrready have changed/deleted something, it might be more difficult.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-11-19 10:06:51+00:00): This changeset was reverted by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77266284
A few errors corrected.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Denise Merchuk (2019-11-19 10:06:53+00:00): Ok, thanks! I'll wait for you to tell me how to proceed.

Thank you so much, sorry again for the inconvenience. My intentions were to update the area and not to cause problems - I feel bad that I couldn't contribute correctly.

Best regards,
Denise
Denise Merchuk (2019-11-19 10:08:30+00:00): Thanks! Let me know if I can help with anything.
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:17:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:20:17+00:00): Dag kerstballon,

De bar staat nu ergens in iemands achtertuin op de kaart.
In NL taggen we de bedrijfsgegevens bij op de adresnode, die al op de kaart staat.
Ik voeg die twee even samen.
Leo Slager (2019-11-17 13:28:28+00:00): Overigens is het redelijk ongeloofwaardig dat daar een bar is.
Het kadaster meldt dat het een woonhuis is. Er zijn geen bedrijfsgegevens te vinden.
Je bijdrage wordt verwijderd.
dieterdreist (2020-02-02 19:42:46+00:00): Bravo, bellissimo lavoro!
gpstracks (2020-02-03 20:34:37+00:00): Grazie.
E' stato un vero piacere :)
Kovoschiz (2019-11-17 13:16:24+00:00): Sorry, you are not allowed to use Google and Geoinfo Map as source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77187383
maraf24 (2019-11-19 19:22:54+00:00): To jakieś bzdury, na terenie szkoły nie ma Lidla. Usuwam.
abakus_uploader (2019-11-17 23:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2019-11-19 19:23:41+00:00): Skasowane.
kayle (2019-11-22 19:40:25+00:00): arrr... z 12.11. mám nejaké čísla lámp z prechádzky v Bojniciach a teraz keď ich idem konečne zaznačiť už sú... ach... Už ani len bežnú mapovaciu vychádzku si človek nemôže spraviť. :D
yzal (2019-12-02 13:29:19+00:00): Vieš ako sa hovorí. Kto skôr príde ten skôr značí :D
Ale ak by si mal čísla 157-161 vrátane tak tie môžeš zaznačiť. Zatiaľ som ich "nenašiel".
aharvey (2019-11-26 23:51:14+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM.

It looks like you've deleted the two turn restrictions that already existing here and then re-added the same turn restrictions or was there some other change you made? I've reinstated the original turn relations.
eserte (2019-12-13 20:57:41+00:00): Ist das wirklich ein Radstreifen? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2023204
gregory_osmand (2019-12-17 00:42:58+00:00): Radstreifen in Vorbereitung (an Straßenbahn-Haltestellen bereits angelegt), Umbau Straßenabschnitt steht bevor, dann wird Radstreifen wie weiter südlich in der Straße durchgehend markiert.
eserte (2019-12-17 20:20:10+00:00): In Vorbereitung, aber noch nicht realisiert? Ich denke, dass wird noch ein paar Monate dauern...
gregory_osmand (2019-12-22 16:37:33+00:00): Das wird wohl so kommen ;-) Habe auf dem Bauschild geschaut: Ausführung ab 3. Quartal 2019, keine Aussage zum Fertigstellungstermin. Vor Ort zieht sich die Sache hin. Fahrradstreifen besser wieder rausnehmen, bis es wirklich so weit ist?
eserte (2019-12-22 16:54:03+00:00): Ja, besser erstmal rausnehmen. Das wird noch eine Weile dauern...
aharvey (2019-11-26 23:41:29+00:00): FYI without the oneway tag, it's assumed two way by default.
AlaskaDave (2020-10-06 09:18:46+00:00): Hi Russ,

I was surprised to see you had lowered the Chiang Mai-Lamphun Road to tertiary class and removed the ref=106.
I'm not familiar with the DOH Roadnet database but there is a sign for 106 as you exit Mahidon Road to go south to Saraphi.

Even if the route designation doesn't continue into Chiang Mai proper I would still think that road should be classified as a primary highway. 

Dave
Russ McD (2020-10-06 13:16:42+00:00): Yes, I know it probably a bone of contention, but it seemed to make to sense, rather than end it at the bridge in CM.  Are the signs you saw actually that of the road, or just directing you to it.  The DOH database includes the mile marker positions, so it seemed to make sense to just start the labelling from MM Zero, rather than extend the primary status to where a looks like it might end.
And then should it be primary where clearly it doesn't match the physical description ... but lets not even go down that avenue 55
Just my take on things !
Cheers
AlaskaDave (2020-10-07 00:49:59+00:00): You know how it is with Thailand ref signs. One can never be sure if they are saying "R106 is that-a-way" or the next right IS R106. At best these highways are poorly marked compared to our home countries. 

Regardless, I still think that highway should be a primary all the way from Mahidon Road to its southern terminus.

It's not a clear cut case so maybe we should ask other mappers about it in the Thailand OSM forum. What do you think?
Russ McD (2020-10-07 08:18:12+00:00): I think a waste of time, but be my guest.
AlaskaDave (2020-10-07 09:14:30+00:00): Well, if talking about it is a waste of time, would you mind if I reclassify that road to primary then?
It is weird to see the classification of a highway change at a node where the highway is identical on both sides (same pavement, width, traffic, etc.) just because a database, esp,. a Thai database, tells us the ref changes from 106 to nothing. I mean, it's the exact same road!
Russ McD (2020-10-07 09:52:02+00:00): Id mind because I dont think its right... I don't mind if you want to discuss on the Forum.  A primary highway has physical characteristics which as the roads become more obstructed as they enter a city, surely the tagging has to change at some point.... the "official" mile zero seems a good one/ You may feel the "traffic lights just before the bridge" are more valid, but not me.
AlaskaDave (2020-10-16 14:18:29+00:00): Russ, I've been busy with other projects and this is the first chance I've had to continue our discussion.

As for your statement about roads becoming obstructed and (because of that) surely the tagging has to change, I disagree. The road's class is not determined only by physical characteristics but also by its importance in the movement of traffic. That highway is certainly important for it entire length and as such it is, IMO, a primary highway.

There are other reasons for my assertion. I located a milestone in Ban Nam Pheung at mile 179 in the tertiary portion of the highway that displays ref=106. In addition, there is a sign at the junction of Mahidol Road that shows 106 _crossing_ that highway. The sign has arrows for 106 pointing both north and south at that intersection. 

The database you're using is interesting, especially for highways that carry no markings, but as we both know all too well, data like that aren't always decisively accurate in LOS. It's not the last word by any means. 

What say you?
Russ McD (2020-10-17 11:49:21+00:00): We won't agree on this one ..... 
I don't arbitrarily change roads, and 2019 street imagery confirms that MM167 is the last freshly painted marker heading North on the 106.  This also happens to fall on the CM-Lamphun boundary, and coincides with the database, (even if the DB shows the wrong location).  
Still heading north, you then shortly see a new Provincial sign, ชม.106 indicating to me, that the National section finishes and the new section, is in essence, a provincial highway.  
Yes, this is a new form of sign, and I would expect the DRR logo to be there, but the translation seems to come out as "Provincial Administrative Organisation".
I'm not Thai, and factual info is hard to gain, but being as the road does diminish in size, and I'm guessing the importance went when Hwy 11 was built, I felt the status had to change somewhere....
Im sure all will have a different view, but I have always stated my view that to take out differences in interpretation of importance, we need to follow the official classifications in tagging.  This example reflects my work.
Yes, there may be older milestones on the Tertiary section, but I suspect these have never been removed, and as for the signage, well I guess that's serving a purpose so it was left.
Mapping is more an art than a science, and taking all into consideration, I believe I have mapped it correctly and hope it remains unchanged.  I will in time, add the correct ref to the tertiary section, with a note.
Russ