piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fkv (2018-12-15 20:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65509185 where the changeset comment is: reverting so-called corrections which actually weren't
H@jo (2018-12-16 07:21:54+00:00): Can you please explain why you think it was needed to revert?
fkv (2018-12-16 08:22:15+00:00): See discussion on changeset 61833634.
surveyor54 (2018-08-21 08:25:14+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine ersten Eintragungen und Änderungen.
Was dir vielleicht nicht direkt bewusst ist: OpenStreetMap ist eine Live-Datenbank die von vielen Personen aber auch anderen Projekten verwendet wird. So werden unsere Daten z.B. auch von Routern für Autofahrer (Navis), Radler, Wanderer aber auch Sehbehinderten verwendet.
Daher achten wir natürlich auf eine möglichst korrekte Datenbasis und auch darauf, dass in OpenStreetMap keine erfundenen oder falsche Daten vorhanden sind.
Als erstes sollte man sich informieren, was OSM ist und wie man mitwirken kann (siehe Links weiter unten). Des weiteren sollte man immer so genau wie möglich arbeiten.


Beim Löschen sehr vorsichtig sein und nur Objekte entfernen, die in der Örtlichkeit nicht mehr vorhanden sind.  Hat sich ein Objekt geändert, sollte man das vorhandene korrigieren, nicht löschen und neu eintragen und vor allen Dingen die Arbeit der anderen Kollegen respektieren (gegebenenfalls kontaktieren).


Auch sollte man bei der Verwendung von Luftbildern vorsichtig sein, da sie teilweise große Versätze haben, die dann im Editor angepasst werden müssen. Hier brauch man schon etwas Erfahrung. Deshalb nicht einfach bestehende Objekte verschieben.


Vor dem Hochladen der Daten, sollte ein aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar eintragen werden, sowie Angaben über die Herkunft der Daten (z.B. Bing, Mapbox, Ortskenntnis, GPS-Track, georeferenzierte Fotos, ...).


Ich kann Dir versichern, die Mitarbeit bei OSM kann viel Spaß machen.
Wenn Du das versuchen solltest, bist Du bei uns herzlich willkomme.
Als erstes solltest du dir folgende Links ansehen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen steht auch unser Forum zur Verfügung, die netten Kollegen können fast immer helfen.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14



In diesem Fall sollten die Gebäude eingetragen werden und nicht die Fläche auf denen die Gebäude stehen. Ich nehme an, dass dies landwirtschaftlich genutzte Hallen sind, so sollte die Fläche, auf denen die Gebäude stehen, als "landuse=farmyard" getagt werden.

Die eingetragenen Gebäude sollten rechtwinklig gemacht werden, soweit sie es einigermaßen in der Örtlichkeit sind.

Die "Landuse-Flächen" sollten auch nicht mit den Straßen oder Wegen "verklebt" werden.

Beim Erfassen von Objekten sollte etwas sorgfältiger (genauer) gearbeitet werden.

Es grüßt

surveyor54
fkv (2018-12-15 20:46:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65509137 where the changeset comment is: reverting so-called corrections which actually weren't
H@jo (2018-12-16 07:22:20+00:00): Can you please explain why you think it was needed to revert?
fkv (2018-12-16 08:18:38+00:00): Because you contributed nothing with these 2 changesets. All you did was essentially to move nodes of paths that I and a few other local mappers had already mapped accurately. I checked a few example nodes and your movings were rather to the worse than to the good. Your source (see above) says that you use Digitalglobe sat images. I wonder if it's even permitted to use that data for OSM. Anyway, we have more accurate aerial images (geoimage.at, basemap.at) available for Austria. See also atlas.noe.gv.at for older generations of those, and the laserscan function is also useful sometimes for checking. These details add to local knowledge, which you cannot have in the same amount as an outsider.
H@jo (2018-12-16 20:33:37+00:00): Thanks for your comments. 
However this changeset was made based on -- my own tracks and sat images --. If you think this is less accurate it is up to you. However the OSM data before my visit was very different from my gps track data. I have many years of experience in community mapping espacially in Hungary, so I have quite some experience on differences in gps and sat data accuracy especially on high mounts. Very often sat data is not accurate at all due to non vertical image taking.

From my point of view it is quite rude to "undo" a changeset without asking and consulting with the author of it. As said it is up to you.

Closed form my side. You can leave the data as it is now...
fkv (2018-12-17 00:03:14+00:00): The OSM data that I had mapped were based upon GPS tracks just as yours, and do you really believe that as an Austrian I have no experience with high mountains? I have been mapping and cave-surveying on hundreds of mountain tours over many years, and I have been mountaineering since my childhood.

When you think it was rude to move the nodes back without asking, how rude were you moving my nodes in the first place without asking me?
H@jo (2018-12-19 18:30:13+00:00): Dear kfv. This is how community mapping goes. People amend the work of other as new and new survesy make it more and more accurate. This is also how Openstreetmaps commmunity normally works. 

If someone does not agree, it is always open to make comments and ask questions. Normally this is the first step and not undoing someones works. 

But as said it is up to you. I will not continue this discussion further. 
Let Otscher be yours :-) only.
Leo Slager (2018-08-20 23:50:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 00:17:40+00:00): waterway=ditch in de gouwzee ?

This changeset will be reverted.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 00:29:29+00:00): Das haben Sie ganz falsch gesehen.
Das ist eine linie die gehôrt zu den outer line from Die Gouwzee. Das ist also gar keine weg !
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 00:33:33+00:00): The waterway=ditch is not correct it is waterway=safe_water.

READ YOUR WIKI  before making such stupid changes !!
OpenTopoMap (2018-10-04 13:19:02+00:00): Have you introduced the bump in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70742239 ?
Hjart (2018-08-20 19:58:11+00:00): Der er ikke tale om en silo, men derimod en gylletank
-lleto- (2022-01-07 15:34:06+00:00): Restaurant is called 'Il Ruustico' and not 'Il Rustica'
user_242798 (2022-01-07 16:23:36+00:00): Changeset Comment was already Resolved.
Additional:
outdoor_seating=yes
website=https://www.ilrustico.nl/
JJJWegdam (2020-01-19 11:49:34+00:00): What is the source of the track speed limit? Can it be used for other Belarusian tracks in OSM that don’t have this information yet?

Якая крыніца абмежавання хуткасці дарожкі?  Ці можна яго выкарыстоўваць для іншых беларускіх трэкаў у OSM, якія яшчэ не маюць гэтай інфармацыі?
jmapb (2018-08-21 19:51:28+00:00): Hi -- wondering what your reasoning is for removing the amenity=cafe tag from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2573115164 -- I was at this location last week and it is, in fact, a cafe as well as a pastry shop.
promiseofbirth (2018-08-21 19:58:33+00:00): It was a slip of the finger. I've reverted now.
jmapb (2018-08-21 21:29:36+00:00): Thanks. The opening_hours, also, was something that I surveyed in person -- either from the door or the menu, I can't remember. I'm guessing yours is from the web site, but I think we should honor the info on the ground over what's posted on the web.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 00:06:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 00:07:44+00:00): Dat blijkt niet uit de verkeersborden.
Of staan er aan de andere zijde van de weg borden die wel een uitzondering maken voor fietsers en bromfietsers ?
KorbiM (2018-08-21 07:18:14+00:00): it will take some days, until I'm there the next time, I will take another look.
maraf24 (2018-10-03 18:29:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104833335
To w budowie czy nie?
gabro00 (2018-08-20 21:05:08+00:00): Bugos az OsmAnd, másodjára se adja hozzá az amenity=drinking_water taget...
hbogner (2018-08-24 08:22:59+00:00): Reverted vandalism
wolfbert (2025-06-07 05:15:11+00:00): Ist Breite 0 z.B. bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618349087 richtig? Irgendeine Breite muss ein Pfad doch haben.
Hjart (2018-08-20 21:14:44+00:00): Connection -> forbindelse 8-)
LessThan3Nodes (2018-08-21 15:19:57+00:00): Tak! Hver dag jeg lærer mere!
eggie (2018-09-02 19:26:53+00:00): footway=sidewalk hoort echt niet op die paden. Het is een bug die in je gratis meekrijgt met editor iD . Graag deze tags weghalen. Doe je het zelf? Verder worden parallelvoetpaden niet gemapt in OSM. Je stapt immers zo van het trottoir de weg op. De routering loopt dan niet. 
Alleen parallelvoetpaden mappen als er een groenstrook tussen ligt.
hbogner (2018-08-24 08:22:19+00:00): Reverted vandalism
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-08-22 14:11:05+00:00): Também não se usa nomes abreviados no openstreetmap
StephaneP (2018-08-21 06:18:26+00:00): Hello !
Tu as ajouté plusieurs doublons, les hameaux Beissat, Loudoueineix, le Chammet, existaient déjà. J'ai corrigé.
Attention aussi au commentaire de changeset, je ne pense pas que celui ci ait de rapport avec les inondations en Inde :-)
StephaneP (2018-08-21 06:18:57+00:00): Le changeset de correction : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61843670
hbogner (2018-08-24 08:21:35+00:00): Reverted vandalism
Durko_freemap (2018-08-27 08:05:11+00:00): Ahoj,
highway=path by nemali pouzivat vozidla vid.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dpath), myslim ze by bolo lepsie skobinovat tagy odtialto (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dtrack + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype). A tag name by sa mal pouzivat len pre vlastne mena, nie naco sluzi dany objekt/ciara. Vdaka za upravy. Durko
tonisko (2018-08-27 08:50:13+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za postrehy, upravil som podľa odporučenia.
Chris Fleming (2018-08-20 22:34:41+00:00): Agree, sounds to me like this road can now be deleted.

Cheers
Chris
GinaroZ (2018-08-20 22:38:19+00:00): Yes if it's no longer there I'd suggest deleting it.
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-21 19:07:41+00:00): way 296770514 is named "United States of America (Minor Outlying Islands);Kingman Reef".  It is the sole member of relation 7248457 named "Kingman Reef" and also a member of relation 2185386 named "United States Minor Outlying Islands".

Based on these relations being established, I think there is no need for a name on way 296770514 and other UMOI like it.  This has the bonus of eliminating a JOSM finding (multiple name values, separated by a semi-colon).  If UMOI needs to be indicated here, I would recommend that the semi-colon be converted to a comma.
stevea (2021-01-27 20:14:06+00:00): The latter (semicolon converted to a comma-space) has been implemented on this and all other USMOI where there were semicolons.  Thank you for the suggestion.
maraf24 (2018-08-27 19:57:53+00:00): Shouldn't it be "source=survey"?
aharvey (2018-08-21 00:33:10+00:00): It seems from the previous editors that this is indeed a named interchange if you delete  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3537363017 how is the interchange and name retained in OSM?
Warin61 (2018-08-21 01:54:35+00:00): a) From my reading of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction this names an exit off the motorway - not the entry to it. 

b) the  Way: Windybanks Interchange (8063077) is seen as you go under the way .. just like you see the name of Way: Falcon Street (171334934)  when you go under it. That does not mean 'Falcon Street' is the OSM interchange used here. It is the name of the street going over the motorway. 

c) the name still remains where it should be - on  the Way: Windybanks Interchange (8063077)

That is my thinking. Does that make sense?
aharvey (2018-08-21 02:27:42+00:00): Part of the problem may be highway=motorway_junction isn't intended to be used to map interchanges, generally the whole system of offrams/onramps where two major roads connect are an interchange and in this case it's a named interchange like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130503373 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130503470 At the end of the day we need to somehow say there is an interchange here and it's known by this name.

Putting the name on the way makes it a regular street name and makes it hard for someone who wants to identify all the named interchanges.
Warin61 (2018-08-21 03:00:07+00:00): Yet that is the interpretation that I have come to. Otherwise .. what name do you give the way over the motorway there? Those signs do state the name of the road over the motorway ... so this is only logical (Dr Spock aproves?). 

As for the problem of motorway interchanges .. Perhaps place=motorway_interchange? Tagging the truth is better than taking the nearest appropriate tag .. because some one like me will come along and say 'that is not right' .. and we have problems. So .. make a new tag ..and use it? 
A different view ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rullzer
aharvey (2018-08-21 04:24:26+00:00): Yeah I agree that the name of the way should be as signposted. I've restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3537363017 using the tag place=highway_interchange.
abakus_uploader (2018-08-21 22:30:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
hbogner (2018-08-23 18:46:43+00:00): This road does not exist in real world!
Please explain the purpose?
hbogner (2018-08-24 08:20:36+00:00): Reverted vandalism
hbogner (2018-08-24 08:19:43+00:00): Reverted vandalism
fkv (2018-08-31 19:58:48+00:00): Wenn du Gebäude nach einem Luftbild verschiebst, dann berücksichtige, dass Luftbilder selber einen Versatz und eine perspektivische Verzerrung aufweisen. Die neuen Orthofotos, die du auch auf basemap.at siehst (von wo du abgezeichnet hast), sind vielerorts weniger lagerichtig als die älteren. Darum hast du mit deiner Verschiebung der Burg Klamm nicht die gewünschte Lagekorrektur erreicht, sondern eher das Gegenteil.
Pikse (2018-10-25 10:51:05+00:00): It's unclear why Nagano city label node was deleted here. Someone recreated it two days ago as node 702987391 but with previous tags missing. So I now restored the old label node in place of newly created one.
bdoin (2018-08-21 21:20:50+00:00): This change is plain wrong, the roundabout exists, this commit should be reverted.
SimonPoole (2018-08-21 21:30:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61870315
KitonZenobia (2018-09-24 13:49:47+00:00): Why have you deleted the MT1 and MT3 relations for Emporia subdivision?
micha_k (2018-09-24 14:02:15+00:00): Emporia Subdivision has between 1 and 5 main tracks. I don't see any purpose in creating separate relations for the different main tracks, as most only exist as several short and independent sections. E.g, MT3 on Emporia Sub exists in Kansas City around Argentine Yard, in Gardner to and from BNSF Logistics Park, in Emporia to and from Emporia Yard and in Mulvane. I added all 1 to 5 main tracks to one Emporia Subdivision relation.
Benny Goodman (2018-10-12 14:41:07+00:00): Hi micha_k,

I urge you to restore the deleted relations. You've deleted them so it's your responsibility to restore them.
micha_k (2018-10-12 14:45:11+00:00): Hi Benny, what is the purpose of having separate relations per track?
Benny Goodman (2018-10-15 19:31:05+00:00): To make sure we pursue the same goal: Why was the principle of having separate relations per track for passenger lines introduced?
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 10:36:04+00:00): Een losse node zonder tags.
Die verwijder ik even.
Matthew Darwin (2018-08-21 13:38:37+00:00): "Ottawa Road 174" is not the name of the road that I am familiar with.  What is your source for this name change?
jmapb (2018-08-22 19:51:29+00:00): Hi AJB1998 -- this looks like another import of medical facilities. It's an improvement over your previous changeset 61782997 because at least most of these nodes appear to land on buildings, and only one in the middle of the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5844929386

Based on these two nodes, which mark buildings that are already tagged on the map, it appears that you're not checking the current state of the map data, but rather importing blindly:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5844928986
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5844928985

Again, there's no way to know where your data is coming from without source tags or comments, and these imports need to be discussed with the Imports mailing list beforehand. Please COMMUNICATE with your fellow mappers! And please spend some time cleaning up this data.
jmapb (2019-01-02 17:42:24+00:00): Hi again AJB1998 -- I ran into one of the imported nodes from this changeset and, checking in, see that you've made no reply to my comments and no improvements to the data. These additions are quite sloppy, some in the wrong locations and some duplicates. I'm inclined to revert the whole changset unless I hear back from you. Jmapb.
jmapb (2019-01-07 19:38:24+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 66107197. Things I could not fix or confirm, I removed/reverted due to the high number of placement and tagging errors, and lack of communication from the mapper.
viloan (2018-08-21 01:05:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartler175 (2018-08-25 09:06:19+00:00): Please edit land areas only if you really know what hyou do:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-79.47959&lat=48.09902&zoom=13&opacity=1.00
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-79.01349&lat=48.23559&zoom=15&opacity=1.00
Hartz Beltza (2018-08-25 13:31:08+00:00): Sorry, I wanted to draw lakes and I could NOT fixed the limits, I think I've done some little mess, please can you fix it on the Québec border. Thank you
viloan (2018-08-21 01:36:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 10:15:00+00:00): De civiele ambulance met twee wiel aandrijving zal nooit het zand op rijden, tenzij er bijzondere voorzieningen zijn die het mogelijk maken om het harde zand aan de zeerand te bereiken.
Logischerwijze zal de ambulance dus op de verharde weg blijven staan.
Dit is zo logisch dat het niet op de kaart hoeft te staan. Maar dat is ook maar mijn mening. Bovendien zal 99,9 % van de gebruikers van de kaart niet weten wat die afkorting betekent.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 10:21:21+00:00): Staat er fysiek nog een bord met die aanduiding ? Dan zou je het als informatiepaneel kunnen taggen.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 10:28:08+00:00): Healthcare=yes zou een goede zijn, icm name=AOP
alphensebezorger (2018-08-21 17:15:32+00:00): Als ik de duitse versie van de wiki lees, komt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Daccess_point aardig overeen met een AOP. Dat wekt bovendien niet de indruk dat hier structureel medisch personeel aanwezig is. Met heathcare=... loop je het risico dat iemand een gewonde hier naartoe sleept, in de veronderstelling dat er zorgprofessionals te vinden zijn.
Leo Slager (2018-08-21 22:59:56+00:00): Nadeel blijft wel dat het niet zichtbaar wordt op de  kaart.
A Hall (2021-07-28 14:04:17+00:00): Curious what the OSM convention you're using to list these boundaries with a 'name', which is really just a description. I've been moving some of these out of 'name' and into 'notes', which seems more appropriate. 

There are certain renders I've seen which are displaying "Latitude 45, rougly Cornwall east to near Kirby Line" over the international border. This does not seem like desired behavior, particularly if this name does not exist in any international standards.
stevea (2021-07-28 16:00:02+00:00): Honestly (it WAS three years ago), I don't recall the specifics here.  I vaguely recall examining these and might have found some "outliers" that didn't meet what seemed like "good naming conventions" so I likely decided to make them "at least good" (better than they were).

If you know of any "international standards" where good, better or even BEST! naming conventions supersede or improve upon what is in OSM (especially changing "rougly" to "roughly"!) please, do change them.  The map welcomes your improvements.
A Hall (2021-07-28 17:16:34+00:00): Great! Yeah, for other mappers who might find what's there as helpful, I will probably move things to the notes. Since I'm not aware of this boundary having any specific historical names (I'm thinking like the Mason-Dixon Line or the Twelve-Mile Circle), I think leaving the name field blank is probably best.