piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
miguel111 (2015-12-15 15:19:30+00:00): Väčšina sú názvy tabuľ, tak ako ich človek vidí na budovách. Ak sa raz krčma volá Vináreň XY a druhá Piváreň XY tak to musí byť celé. Je to súčasť názvu. Ak svieti na budove obrovský nápis Tržnica a je tam aj nákupné centrum ktoré sa tak volá, potom to tiež musí byť.
Niekto si dá názov po anglicky "Gallery restaurant" a druhý "Reštaurácia Gallery" tak preto, že je po slovensky tak "Reštaurácia" už vypadne? Je to vec pohľadu a na hlbšiu diskusiu.  Ak je niekde duplicita, to vôbec nevadí. Lepšie ako keby niečo chýbalo. :)
ViriatoLusitano (2014-12-12 13:28:28+00:00): Olá, obrigado pela contribuição!

Reparei que no comentário deixastes informações referentes ao endereço e número de telemóvel da estação da PSP.

Se possível tenta atribuir essas características ao ponto do mapa assim ele pode ser encontrado por outras pessoas.

É muito fácil editar, basta seleccionares o ponto em questão e preencher a informação nos espaços abaixo de "Morada". Para meter o número clica no pequeno ícone com um telemóvel mais abaixo no menu.
Allroads (2017-02-20 15:25:52+00:00): Er is geen landuse meer aanwezig, dit heb je er af gegooid, nu zijn het gaten in de kaart.
CaptainHolt (2017-02-20 15:32:48+00:00): Ik heb geen idee wat u bedoelt, bij mij zijn er geen gaten aanwezig, ook niet als ik uitgelogd ben. Daarbij is dit van 2 jaar geleden, dus...
Allroads (2017-02-20 16:06:10+00:00): De kleur die je nu ziet is de ondergrond kleur, dat bedoel ik met gat in de kaart, als de belijning er wel, is het eigenlijk geen teken gat, het gaat om de invulling, tagging, wat het is en hoe het er uit ziet, als landuse=grass er op zit wordt het gras aangegeven met groene kleur. Dat was eerder het geval. Deze wijziging was door jouw doorgevoerd, vandaar dat ik reageer.
Ook al is het twee jaar geleden.
Samen maken we een kaart beter.
CaptainHolt (2017-02-20 16:11:03+00:00): Oh zo. Dat zal ik een dezer dagen aanpassen. U mag het trouwens ook aanpassen als u wilt, de kaart is van ons allemaal, dus voel u vrij :-)
Allroads (2017-02-20 16:38:54+00:00): Natuurlijk, ik kan het ook aanpassen. Neem aan dat jij daar veel beter bekend ben. Maar als ik het vertel, ga jij er anders tegenaan kijken en dat verbeterd de werkwijze, de problematiek was ook hier weggooien terwijl het mocht blijven bestaan en aanpassen. Net als bij park en gras.
Ook ik leer van mij fouten, die ik tegenkom als je zo'n site bekijkt.
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=16&lat=52.34079&lon=5.21716&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/#zoom=17&lat=52.340416&lon=5.215576&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
Nu is parking een apart verhaal.

Update van buildings vraag hier:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
Dit halen we uit een landelijk BAG bestand.


Overweeg eens met de editor JOSM te gaan werken. Daar is een validatie knop, controleknop controle van wat je getekend hebt. Voordat je upload.

Weet je dat Luchtfoto 2016 van de overheid nu ook voor Openstreetmap beschikbaar is. Licentie is geregeld, veel beter dan BING. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57298
Otnow (2014-12-12 08:40:17+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Спасибо за ваш вклад.

Тэг name=* используется чтобы обозначать имя собственное.

Вы делаете много ошибок, поэтому вот несколько ссылок, которые будут вам полезны:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Main_Page

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_practice

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21
naoliv (2014-12-12 16:18:23+00:00): Regis, você pode deixar esses limites contendo "place=suburb" ou "place=neighbourhood" se quiser.
Mas algo que ainda falta neles é ter "admin_level=10"
O nível administrativo 10 indica que o local é uma separação de bairro.
RegisAJ (2014-12-13 16:14:41+00:00): Ok, nível administrativo 10 atribuído aos bairros.
EugenyN (2014-12-12 09:30:47+00:00): такие мультиполигоны, где область состоит из множества участков очень тяжело поддерживать. В редакторе работать с ними не удобно.  особенно для новичков. да и я стараюсь с ними не связываться. в таких мультиполигонах труднее найти ошибки, они часто ломаются.

лучше дублировать линии.

вот и сейчас похоже есть ошибка. "лесопарковый участок ниилгис" - лес не рисуется.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:43:14+00:00): What evidence do you have for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316853942 being a recreation ground?  As part of a former power station, it seems unlikely!
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:46:51+00:00): Something's also gone wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316853937 (it's not a closed way, and surely also not a recreation ground)
anderfo (2015-02-10 17:28:40+00:00): Please, do NOT use the "Simplify" method in JOSM with standard settings; it destroys data! Apparently you've used this method extensively during the last months. Streams and trails that were previously nicely curved and detailed have now lost their detail and many turns have even disappeared. Please stop!
SomeoneElse (2014-12-12 09:52:24+00:00): I notice that you've deleted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178314314/history (with note "No sign of former rail here (the terrain would make it unlikely!)") and redrawn a disused railway line http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316865389 .  What evidence do you have that in the month since I was last here a railway has been built and fallen into disuse?  Have you ever actually been there and had a look?  If not, and if you're just guessing based on aerial imagery (where you get no idea of the vertical component at all) you really shouldn't be editing at all in areas that are (a) open to the public like this public park and (b) have active mappers.
Nico2Brandenburg (2024-11-08 07:06:09+00:00): Hallo, mir ist hier ein "layer = -3" aufgefallen. Die Straße würde damit unterirdisch liegen. Oder habe ich da was falsch verstanden?
Nico2Brandenburg (2024-11-08 07:07:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225127527/history#map=17/52.952827/12.378577
robert (2014-12-11 21:04:41+00:00): Please don't abuse the "name" tag to give things a generic label. Tag it as a bowling green if it is one.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

The "name" is to be used if e.g. this bowling green has a _specific_ name.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-12 10:00:34+00:00): What evidence do you have that the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40961536 is Bevercotes Coal Stockyard?  Where is the current signage?
neiljp (2014-12-12 02:05:48+00:00): What was the purpose of this change? You've deleted parts of the building? Please include details in the text box when you save changes so you and others can look back and see what changed :)
林13 (2014-12-12 03:39:10+00:00): 更正垃圾桶、消防隊、泰雅博物館位置
新增相關資訊
林13 (2014-12-12 03:40:01+00:00): 移動雲之湯位置
新增電話資訊
rickmastfan67 (2014-12-18 10:36:50+00:00): FYI, but you broke Forbes Ave in this changeset by accident. You made it oneway on a small segment that the traffic goes both ways.  I've fixed it in Changeset 27547864. ;)
kuhni74 (2025-02-04 10:44:47+00:00): Bitte um Beteiligung an https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3230709 zum Weg 795, vielen Dank!
GerdP (2015-10-21 18:40:16+00:00): please review:
way 316911377 is tagged 
highway=traffic_signals
I guess this is a highway=footway,
footway=crossing controlled by a 
traffic_signal?
Trumbun (2015-10-21 21:49:16+00:00): Yes, Updated as suggested
GerdP (2015-10-22 03:28:32+00:00): thanks, I've changed it a little bit. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
I hope I got that wiki right.
GerdP (2015-10-22 05:15:27+00:00): sorry, wrong link:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-10 12:41:15+00:00): Was für einen Sinn ergibt es, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28722443 psv=no zu taggen? Der Tag ist dafür da, um anzugeben, dass ein Weg nur für Busse und Taxis ausgewiesen ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:psv Anzugeben, dass der Weg nicht für Busse und Taxis ausgewiesen ist, wird immer angenommen und muss daher nicht angegeben werden. Heißt dann eh auch nur, dass man mit einem Auto dort fahren darf.
Nakaner (2017-02-10 17:12:35+00:00): Hallo Graf Westerholt,

Die STOAG ist höchstwahrscheinlich Kunde der Init AG aus Karlsruhe (nein, ich arbeite dort nicht). Die Init hatte anfangs in ihrem Router, mit dem Verkehrsbetriebe Busrouten (und Umleitungen) planen können, das Access-Tagging falsch interpretiert. Nur psv=* wurde ausgewertet, highway=service wurde ignoriert, wenn psv!=yes. Falls du auf solches Tagging stößt, korrigiere es bitte. Vielen Dank.

Die Verantwortlichen bei Init wissen mittlerweile Bescheid und haben den Fehler in der Software korrigiert (sonst wäre es anderen Mappern sicherlich aufgefallen).

Viele Grüße

Michael
sabas88 (2014-12-12 13:13:19+00:00): E' meglio lasciarci anche amenity=prison , è il tag più usato ;)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prison
dan980 (2014-12-13 09:34:39+00:00): ok
DaCor (2014-12-12 18:04:59+00:00): Hi, Please be aware the data you are editing is live map data, also Hogwarts is not located here, you need to go to platform 9 and 3 quarters and get the train :)

Seriously though, don't add silly stuff to the data, only legit info
DaCor (2014-12-12 18:14:52+00:00): Hi, I'm pretty sure this building is not called Fairy Princess' Casa. I've removed this information as I believe it to be false based on some of your other edits. Please ensure you only add legit info to the map as this is live map data in use
DaCor (2014-12-12 18:15:57+00:00): I also removed the "Unicorn House" name from this also
DaCor (2014-12-12 18:16:38+00:00): Hi, Polar Bears dont use houses. Please stop adding fake information to the map
Janjko (2015-03-04 15:54:35+00:00): This is wrong. You tagged the City of Zagreb county with a wikidata tag about Zagreb city.

What Wikidata tag should this relation get then:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3168167
Edward (2015-03-04 16:02:35+00:00): You're absolutely right. Before my edit this relation linked to Q3537480, which doesn't exist in Wikidata. I will remove the wikidata tag.
Janjko (2015-03-04 16:06:39+00:00): Ah, so that's it. The problem is there is only one Wikipedia article with Zagreb and Zagreb county together. That makes no sense, and it affects Wikidata and OSM. I have to try and split that article.
Edward (2015-03-04 16:10:03+00:00): There is a wikidata item for Zagreb county:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27038
Edward (2015-03-04 16:13:22+00:00): This relation is Zagreb county: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/226241
Janjko (2015-03-04 16:20:25+00:00): Sorry, I meant Grad Zagreb county. There are 3 administrative entities with Zagreb in their name:

Zagreb (city):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3168167
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1435

Grad Zagreb (county):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/226224
No Wikidata entry (the deleted one)

Zagreb county (county):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/226241
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27038
Edward (2015-03-04 16:24:59+00:00): That makes sense.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:58:10+00:00): The current path of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316928830 seems unlikely based on both the Bing imagery and OS_OpenData_StreetView.
Nakaner (2014-12-13 08:35:29+00:00): Danke, dass du das Gleis reaktiviert hast. Kommst du aus der Gegend? Laut einer Bekanntmachung von DB Netz wurde im Bahnhof Igel einiges umgebaut. Könntest du dort vor Ort nachschauen? Ich habe dafür schon ein paar Notes angelegt.
MrWebber (2014-12-14 22:20:51+00:00): Hallo, das war keine wirkliche Reaktivierung, teilweise wurde das Gleis verlegt, und auch die Überführung der B 49 wurde komplett neu gebaut. Eröffnung des 2. Gleises war am 12.12.2014.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-12 19:57:54+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  As you might have noticed from the wiki page for "dead_pub" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddead_pub that tag was something of a stop-gap until a better idea came along.  Since it was written tagging as "disused=amenity=pub" has got more traction (compare http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/disused%3Aamenity=pub with http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/amenity=dead_pub), so I'd probably go for that instead.

Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a message.

Cheers, Andy
user_2513565 (2014-12-13 12:51:51+00:00): Thanks Andy
I'd actually consulted the Wiki but when I came to make the change the editor offered me dead_pub as the first option so assumed this was the right thing to do. Clearly I need to understand better how this works! Would changing the name to X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X  Inn (Closed) as well be wrong?

Anyway, thanks for the tip.

d.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-14 23:21:33+00:00): Interesting that iD (the in-browser editor) suggested "dead_pub" - the choices it offers are normally fairly clever (if US-centric).  I wouldn't personally change the name to "XXX Pub (Closed)" since the name isn't "XXX Pub (Closed)", though some mappers do do that.
GerdP (2017-09-24 07:33:43+00:00): Hi!
I wonder where this highway=access_ramp leads to and what it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316942164
Is it a special way for wheelchairs (highway=footway + wheelchair=yes) ?
Is there a lift (highway=elevator) at the end?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-12 20:21:16+00:00): What source is there for the operator of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316939875/history ?  I've never seen a sign there.  Is it licence-compatible with OSM?
escada (2014-12-23 14:15:05+00:00): Ik vermoed dat het tafeltennisclub moet zijn met 1 "f"

Verder kan u de gegevens nog verbeteren door
leisure=pitch
en
sport=table_tennis 
toe te voegen
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-01-09 23:25:12+00:00): Granice tworzy się za pomocą relacji.
tosky (2014-12-12 14:38:31+00:00): Sembra che l'unica via aggiunta sia presa di peso da una traccia GPS, e si sovrappone a quelle esistenti; penso che la modifica, per così com'è, andrebbe rimossa...
SomeoneElse (2014-12-14 10:29:10+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

I've just noticed that part of the northern roundabout on the Burnley / Padiham road seems to have got deleted ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231267658/history#map=18/53.79069/-2.26608 ).  Is that really not there any more or was it an accident?  The Bing imagery shows a car on it, but obviously road layouts change, and there are sometimes roundabouts with "one bit missing" like this.  

Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a mail.

Cheers, 
Andy
magicpatch (2014-12-15 09:26:25+00:00): Hi Andy,
They've recently changed the layout of this roundabout, added new signals and removed that part of the roundabout. Drivers now need to drive down to the other roundabout further down the road and come back up if they need to.
magicpatch (2014-12-15 09:49:20+00:00): Google Street View shows this as it was updated in September 2014 https://goo.gl/maps/XsH59
SomeoneElse (2014-12-15 10:04:35+00:00): Thanks - hopefully no-one will look at the imagery and add it back in without checking the changeset discussion comments here.  Unfortunately people do sometimes do this, so you may want to keep an eye on the area to check.

Oh - and (just in case you're not aware) Google's Street View images aren't compatible with the OSM licence (not that it's relevant here, since you updated based on survey and are just trying to show me what it looks like).
SomeoneElse (2014-12-15 22:17:17+00:00): I wouldn't pick the tag based on whether it renders or not - I'd pick the one that best describes it.  If something that really should be rendered isn't on the "standard" layer, add an issue over at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues .
eggie (2022-10-06 20:38:56+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstbericht ontvangen.. Bij deze.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Sebastian Hagens (2022-10-07 06:15:42+00:00): Inderdaad, 1 aanpassing ooit in 2014 gedaan. Intussen is er weer genoeg veranderd =) OSM blijft echter wel een fantastisch project met community!
trial (2019-10-29 12:44:53+00:00): merci de ne pas confondre hangar agricole et hangar aéronautique
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-12 15:13:47+00:00): Chyba Ci się obwodnice pomyliły - otworzono pólnocną obwodnicę. Południowa będzie za circa rok.
escada (2014-12-23 13:57:37+00:00): Hallo,

-English text available upon request --

Bedankt voor het verfijnen van de kaart door een afzonderlijk fietspad te tekenen.
Jammer genoeg is zo'n fietspad toevoegen niet altijd even gemakkelijk.

Ik vermoed dat het fietspad eenrichting is, niet ? Dan zou u best nog oneway=yes op dat fietspad toevoegen.

Voor uw toevoeging was het fietspad feitelijk al gemapped door de cycleway=track op de hoofdweg. Deze tag zou nu vervangen moeten worden door bicycle=use_sidepath.

Ook heb ik gemerkt dat het fietspad aan de linkerkant nog niet helemaal is doorgetrokken. Dit bemoeilijkt ook nog eens de juiste tagging op de hoofdweg.

Zou het mogelijk zijn deze wijzigingen aan te brengen ? Alvast bedankt.

Mocht u nog vragen hebben, voeg deze dan gerust toe als commentaar hier.
Damgan (2014-12-12 15:28:57+00:00): Modif retrait magasin de vélo
neuhausr (2014-12-19 15:17:54+00:00): Hi Andrew, just an fyi that there were some typos in your recent Fargo changesets--see taginfo (http://tinyurl.com/ndper3t)
cadsauxk (2014-12-24 16:36:26+00:00): Porque tantas deleções? Você apagou muitas relações também, porque? Que correções são estas? Você poderia descrever isto um pouco melhor?
cadsauxk (2015-01-06 21:34:50+00:00): Infelizmente vou ter de reverter, tantas deleções assim fica quase impossível recuperar depois.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27966447
LarsBG (2015-06-21 05:24:12+00:00): Hej b-holdet

Er Tarm Bybæk noden flyttet ved en fejl ?
node id="3096930797"

Lars
b-holdet (2015-06-21 08:19:39+00:00): Hej Lars,

Jeg loadede kun kommunegrænserne ind i JOSM og gennemgik efterfølgende om nogle noder var parret med andet end grænser.
Desværre har jeg ikke fundet dem alle, så selve noden er flyttet korrekt, men vandløbene er desværre fulgt med.
Så det skal skille ad og sætte på plads igen.

/Flemming
LarsBG (2015-06-21 10:39:11+00:00): Tak Flemming for opdatering + rettelse 

Lars
maciek-szn (2014-12-12 19:34:46+00:00): Pozwoliłem sobie wycofać ten zestaw zmian z następujących powodów:
1. usunąłeś wiatę na przystanku "Komuny Paryskiej",
2. zmieniłeś przebieg granicy administracyjnej osiedli (to nie jest chodnik!).
naoliv (2016-07-16 22:11:24+00:00): Maurício, o nome da rua você pegou a partir do mapa do Google?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-17 15:22:47+00:00): I notice that you've changed the road class of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43090911 .  Was that based on survey?
Ropino (2015-01-18 10:39:11+00:00): It based on Bing.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-20 01:37:46+00:00): Can you definitely tell the difference between unclassified and residential just from aerial imagery?  I don't think that I'd be able to without actually going there to have a look.
Nelg (2014-12-14 17:28:18+00:00): Thank you for the numerous contributions, could you still comment the changesets with a concise description of the changes you've made? Åbo Akademi is also a university, and its buildings should be tagged as such.
SPIN Unit (2014-12-14 19:19:01+00:00): We are doing some research in Turku so you will find lots of changes from users "damianoc" and "SPIN Unit". We are not doing changes unless there is something really wrong with the geometry, we are mostly adding buildings or metadata to all those that don't have any.
Skinfaxi (2017-06-03 08:42:10+00:00): Du har taggad några väger med bridleway. Det används vanligtvis för påbjudna ridväger märkt med en rund blå vägmärke som visar en häst. Då sadant är ytterst sällsynt i Sverige vill jag bara säkerställa att taggingen är korrekt.

IF You so not understand i kan write in English.
Hjart (2015-05-15 08:19:43+00:00): De her cycleway=track langs Linåvej vest for Mollerup forekommer mig virkelig svære at få øje på både på Bing og Geodatastyrelsens fotos
Henrik PS (2015-05-15 17:01:41+00:00): Du har ret. Jeg kan ikke lige se hvordan jeg er kommet frem til. Tak fordi du har gjort mig opmærksom på det. Jeg får det rettet.
MichaH (2014-12-13 13:35:54+00:00): Also nochmal um das nun hoffentlkich klarzustellen. Ins name tag gehört der OFFIZIELLE Name eines Wegs ofder Platzes das ist hier der Theodor-W-Adorno-Platz und NICHT Appellplatz!!!!
Appellplatz war noch nie ein offizieller Name diese Platzes und gehört damit allerhöchstens ins alt_name oder local_name tag!
Unterlasse  also bitte dieses Sinnlose umbenennen vom offiziellen Namen in den inoffiziellen!
fooGNU (2014-12-14 11:46:05+00:00): Solange dieser "Campus" und insbesondere seit neustem dieser Platz von der Universität aktiv dazu genutzt werden, um sich über die Geschichte Deutschlands und dieses Geländes und damit der Shoah totzuschweigen, wozu seit neustem nun auch noch der Name dieses großen Philosophen missbraucht wird (damit die Universität sich nun von ihrer "schändlichen" Adresses Norbert-Wollheim-Platz verabschieden kann), werde ich mich keinem authoritären Gehabe unterordnen, zumal die eingetragenen Namen den in weiten Kreisen gebräuchlichsten entsprechen.
fooGNU (2014-12-14 11:46:29+00:00): Für offizielle Namen gibt es auch das Feld "official_name" btw
MichaH (2014-12-14 16:17:11+00:00): Das ist eine Karte undf kein politischerer Zirkus. Nur weil du von der Mehrheit überstimmt wurdest und dir die Eintscheidung nicht in den Kram passt heisst das noch langer nicht dass du machen darfst was du willst. Jede politische Entscheidung ist nun mal eine Entscheidung der MEHRHEIT, und ist dann also solche anzuerkennen auch wenn du anderer Meinung bist!
fooGNU (2014-12-15 15:34:54+00:00): Würde mich mal interessieren, woher Du Deine Mehrheit herhast und in welchen Entscheidungsprozess ich angeblich involviert war...

Hast Du persönlich Erhebungen angestellt, die eine "mehrheitliche" Entscheidung nahegelegt haben, oder steckt hier nur eine politische Elite dahinter, die diese Benennung herbeigeführt hat?

Wenn für Dich schon irgendwelche von Stadt und Universität gesteuerten Prozesse einen einwandfreien Mehrheitsentscheid darstellen, hättest Du by the way auch das "Ja zu Adolf Hitler" als Mehrheitsentscheid anerkannt?

Was ich fordere ist ja gerade, dass diese Landkarte den politischen Zirkus eben nicht mitbetreibt, das dauernde Verschleiern von geschichtlichen Sachverhalten, Beschönigung von Orten grausamer Geschichte.
Peter Dobratz (2015-01-18 04:55:27+00:00): Why did you remove the landuse=farmland tag on Way 151748849?
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-13 04:20:39+00:00): Proszę nie kasować adresów lub przenosić kompletną informację adresową na obrys!
Przykład: 
- adres który skasowałeś: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2468290800/history
- budynek z bezużytecznym adresem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316992963/history

Wycofuję Twoje zmiany i proszę się poprawić.