piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 15:42:11+00:00): if it is stream (small, natural flowing waterway) then `waterway=stream` would be much better fit
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-19 15:27:34+00:00): You marked http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439786808 as a golf course / driving range; the provided website (http://www.golfjesenik.cz/) points to an online shoe shop, however.. can you clarify & correct the data? thanks!
rilando (2017-09-19 18:23:52+00:00): something had to change
rilando (2017-09-19 18:25:58+00:00): I'll fix it
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-26 15:35:47+00:00): Do you have new information on that driving range? Does it still exist? Do you have a new name/website?
rilando (2017-10-01 21:13:22+00:00): the golf course is not currently in use,
web pages no longer exist
I do not know if the golf course is still recovering
I will probably delete the golf course
originally it was supposed to be a big project
alphensebezorger (2016-09-13 19:48:12+00:00): Could you please check the spelling of name of the greengrocer you added? "Jogn" strongly suggests a typo in my opinion.
zors1843 (2016-08-29 20:35:35+00:00): Name and address of shop and fuel ?
user_5359 (2016-09-04 15:48:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/759603210 ? I think your entry is a duplicate to this hotel.

Please double check this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 16:57:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374733746

Is it a factory or shop selling coffee with "factory" in their name?
Joachim_0 (2024-04-11 23:49:18+00:00): It is a factory, a small coffee factory in the area.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-15 21:39:03+00:00): so it is not a shop? Or can person walk in and buy coffee beans there?
Joachim_0 (2024-04-16 20:25:59+00:00): Yes, but they have green beans not roasted. They are a green bean exporter.
lostmike (2016-08-30 09:59:18+00:00): This now has two names. Is it name=Asda or name:en=CoOp?
Pavel47 (2016-09-04 10:12:02+00:00): Если считаете геометрию недостаточно точной - уточните ее, прорисуйте границы по отмостке. Добавление претега was:= на существующие объекты по причине неидеальной геометрии считаю вандализмом. Верните, пожалуйста, объекты к нормальному состоянию.
Pavel47 (2016-09-04 10:14:03+00:00): "очень сомнительно что это не natural=grassland" - сомневаетесь, что газоны правильной геометрической формы меж новостроек были искусственно сформированы человеком, а не появились в результате природной стихии?
santamariense (2016-08-30 03:21:13+00:00): Olá Pedro NC,

Primeiramente, bem-vindo ao OSM.

Não se faz necessário que se escreva o tipo de objetos no mapa, isso se compreende pela sua simbologia e/ou tags. Isso na verdade é um erro.

Deixo para você arrumar.

Boas contribuições,

santamariense
Supaplex (2016-09-02 05:05:44+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
muralito (2016-08-29 23:51:00+00:00): area=yes no tiene el significado que le intentas dar. Se usa para que todo lo interno al poligono sea algo ruteable.
aharvey (2017-01-15 00:10:40+00:00): A lot of the nodes you've added here are duplicates of things already mapped. Eg The Star casino is already mapped as a tourism=attraction at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16597926

Wet N Wild Sydney at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314946608

Potentially others too. Why did you create these duplicates?
Warin61 (2017-01-15 00:25:10+00:00): Would have checked these for duplicates at the time of entry ... will recheck on the two you are concerned with for speed.
Warin61 (2017-01-15 00:43:26+00:00): Ok - Way: The Star (16597926)  Had no tourist=attraction when I added node 43749057538 ... so not a 'duplicate' at the time? When you added tourist=attraction to this way ...  that was the duplication .. delete the node?
 I am not certain that the whole building is a tourist attraction. 
Way 314946608 wet and wild tagged tourism=them park ... here I can agree .. I probably simply checked for tourism=attraction duplication .. not tourism=* duplication ... 

Note - I have made the corrections to these two ... and will check the rest soonest.
Warin61 (2017-01-15 06:54:57+00:00): Quite usefull. I have reviewed the western and northern ones. Some are resorts - better tagged tourism=resort. A few are similar - used web search to resolve names and function. Some are duplicates. I have added some details to some - websites, opening hours, a few made into ways with boundaries. Some don't look to exist .. and there associated facilities get bad reviews anyway! I have left one that identifies the mine?, the other prior node is for a museum.  Will have to go beak can check that one again after thinking about it.
aharvey (2017-01-15 23:58:24+00:00): >Ok - Way: The Star (16597926) Had no tourist=attraction when I added node 43749057538 ... so not a 'duplicate' at the time? When you added tourist=attraction to this way ... that was the duplication .. delete the node? 
I am not certain that the whole building is a tourist attraction. 

Sorry you're right! I added the tourism=attraction after you added the node. It's hard to say if it's a tourist attraction or not but you added it as one to OSM using the old name, so I merged it into the existing object, forgetting to delete your original node.

>Way 314946608 wet and wild

Thanks for fixing this.
Warin61 (2017-01-16 00:05:48+00:00): One hand washes the other. 
I need some clear time to do the rest of these. Possibly this afternoon.
As I said, I think I only checked them for duplication of tourism=attraction and not other things and that has lead to this problem. Still learning.
Warin61 (2017-01-19 02:49:46+00:00): That took longer than I thought! Some deletions, many changes. I have taken some to be tourism=resort for example. Others I have expanded to be ways. Many have added website links. Anyway .. all reviewed now,
marc__marc (2020-02-11 23:54:26+00:00): Hello,
you added 12 objetcs around Nesowadnehunk Field Campground
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374899387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935434
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935436
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935427
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374899388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935433
can you review the doc about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch i think it perfect fit those.
Warin61 (2016-10-03 06:55:19+00:00): Hi,
Way: 439819578 you set sport=hockey, I have changed this to sport=field_hockey .. hockey could be either field or ice hockey. OSM now uses field_hockey or ice_hockey to avoid confusion. 
See the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhockey
Stalfur (2016-08-30 01:13:14+00:00): A bus or a tourist bus?
BohdanKuts (2016-08-30 07:25:39+00:00): Привіт. 
А звідки Ви берете інформацію про сітки енергоживлення?
olehz (2016-08-30 10:35:11+00:00): частоко зі знімків, частоково з обленерго - http://nadoloni.com/test4.html#5.58/50.347/28.734 - від 220кВ і вище покрито вже увесь захдний регіон. лишились лише 100кВ і 35кВ - а це вже дуже просто визначити по розмірам підстанцій
BohdanKuts (2016-08-30 10:37:27+00:00): Зрозуміло. Дякую за відповідь)
5m4u9 (2016-08-31 07:09:37+00:00): Gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Las paradas de buses deben ser marcadas sobre la vía y añadir bajo "bus_stop". El lugar dónde los pasajeros suben/bajan se marca on "plataforma"
5m4u9 (2016-08-31 07:10:03+00:00): No es necesario añadir la categoría en el nombre. Se debe quitar porque estaría repetido
5m4u9 (2016-08-31 07:10:55+00:00): Los polígonos no se dibujan como en autocad, en la vida real estan separados por aceras  de las calles.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-11-16 02:08:58+00:00): Hi Giulio,

The name tags in OSM are used in the following way:
"name" contains the name used by the locals, this usually means Thai name in Thai script. This is different for hotels and other brands where their primary name could be in English (e.g. 7-Eleven).
"name:en" contains the English version of the name, this is usually the transcribed name, though a translated name could work too.
"name:th" is the Thai name in Thai script (no English characters should be used here).

I am telling you this because I have seen you change correctly tagged nodes/ways and replacing it with incorrectly tagged data.

Please keep contributing, if you need help with the tagging, you can join us in the Thai forum here:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=46
Supaplex (2016-09-02 05:05:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Superadlen (2016-08-30 08:52:01+00:00): MERCI
SomeoneElse (2020-03-28 10:23:51+00:00): Hello MSchuby,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 3 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4375080767 had a "source=Google" tag added to it. Maybe that came from somewhere else - perhaps you copied tags from another object? We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, and there are more of these, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
Fischkopp0815 (2016-08-30 06:40:33+00:00): Willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Leider hast Du bei deinem ersten Versuch einigen Schaden verursacht.Ich habe diesen Changeset mit CS 41793863  zurückgesetzt, weil Du viele Straßen und den gesamten Residential-Landuse von Westerland gelöscht hast
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=41792336 . Das Rote sind die Löschungen. War Deine Absicht die Linienführung der Stadtbus Linie C zu verändern?
AndersAndersson (2016-08-30 08:20:45+00:00): Hello,

Please keep in mind that the name-tag is not a description of the object.


Regards
Anders
adrianojbr (2016-08-30 21:06:36+00:00): olá, huskell. bem vindo à comunidade de mapeadores do osm.

esses dados que você apagou se referem a números de porta (casa). não há problema em mapear propriedades privadas. o objetivo do osm é mapear o mundo inteiro (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features).

reverti as mudanças que você fez nesse conjunto de alterações.

abraço.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 15:29:50+00:00): Hello,
Have the LINZ issues that were raised by a couple of users (with different importers) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=New%20Zealand#2/36.0/-10.4 been addressed?  I don't see anything mentioned over at https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/nzopengis .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
mrsid (2016-08-30 20:44:21+00:00): I've spot checked random features I have uploaded recently and found no issue.  I suppose it's a problem with the LINZ source having duplications?
JOSM validation has only picked up a single instance of this happening, which I corrected before uploading.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 20:58:32+00:00): Thanks.  It's probably also a good idea to check with scai and botdidier2020 (which also commented at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=New%20Zealand#4/-39.91/173.19 to make sure that they can't see any issues with these later changesets too - just to make sure that they're happy too.
Best Regards,
Andy
AgusQui (2016-09-03 21:01:56+00:00): Tuve que revertir éste y otros conjuntos de cambios hechos por usted debido a múltiples errores que a producido en los datos, como avenidas corridas muchos metros de su lugar, aqui se puede apreciar bien: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=41792838
Por favor, tenga mas cuidado con sus ediciones, todas sus colaboraciones se ven reflejadas en cientos de mapas y aplicaciones, si necesita ayuda no dude en acudir al resto de la comunidad, le dejo algunas paginas que le seran de ayuda: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina
http://learnosm.org/es/beginner/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_practice
Saludos!
freebeer (2018-10-28 09:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63945506 where the changeset comment is: delete a totally bogus maps.me alpine hut in a big city
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:27:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pratikyadav (2016-08-30 04:49:40+00:00): local knowledge in source is wrong. My bad.
user_101460 (2016-08-30 05:09:06+00:00): こういう使い方は止めてください。
OpenStreetMapでテストを行う場合はdevelopmentサーバーが用意されているのでそちらをご利用ください。

http://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

こちらもご覧ください。

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Sandbox_for_editing
saigaso (2016-08-30 05:13:16+00:00): 初めて使ったので不適切な使い方をしてしまいした。すいません。
ご指摘ありがとうございます。
user_101460 (2016-08-30 05:24:40+00:00): 慌てていたので、こちらこそ失礼いたしました。すみませんでした。

OMSでなにかわからない事などあれば、OSMのMLかtwitterなどで #osmjp のハッシュタグをつけると誰か答えてくれると思うので、よろしくお願いします。
user_101460 (2016-08-30 05:29:46+00:00): 巻き戻しをするので、修正せずにそのまま置いててもらえればいいですよ
saigaso (2016-08-30 05:51:57+00:00): 丁寧に教えていただいてありがとうございます！お手数ですがよろしくお願いいたします。
user_101460 (2016-08-30 06:48:41+00:00): 巻き戻し終わりました。ご協力ありがとうございました!
manoharuss (2016-08-30 08:32:08+00:00): Hi Inayat Ur Rahman,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have observed that you have been adding year+personal names to all of the guest houses, pubs you have mapped. This is not a good practice.  Since OpenStreetMap is a public mapping database, everyone who is using OpenStreetMap based services or OpenStreetMap itself will see these points of interest and get confused. I would like it if you fix your edits and they are so many. Let me know the reason behind why you added personal names in the name tag for these points. 

Best,
Manohar
Владимир К (2016-08-30 06:20:59+00:00): киоск building=kiosk, а не landuse=retail. тэги landuse используются для территорий
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:26:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:26:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
MKnight (2016-09-06 19:10:39+00:00): Moin, wenn Du Öffnungszeiten "korrigierst", dann bitte richtig und nicht so. 

Das Schema findest Du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Nach diesem Schema kannst Du die korrekt eintragen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:26:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:25:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:25:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Warin61 (2017-06-18 23:00:22+00:00): Hi,
Why is this relation 6543467 required? 

It is simply 3 areas - that can be 3 individual ways. Easy. And then you have no shared segments in the relation/way.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 13:57:52+00:00): These are personal MAPs.ME notes.  They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful.
Pilot777 (2016-09-04 21:23:48+00:00): Кто-то нагадил на данном участке! Неоднократно удаляя годами существующую дорогу! Просьба забанить Житомирского желоба выдвигающего идею индивидуальных правил для Украины и в частности Киева которые никак несоответствующие международным! Также не соблюдает правила OSM. Писать кляузы не умею, но просьба отправить на него Огромную жалобу в редакцию OSMи как можно на дольше заблокировать его IP
Pilot777 (2016-09-05 05:40:23+00:00): и это была не поправка, это был возврат дорог к состоянию, в котором они были на OSM в течении десятка лет, и в реальности ничего не менялось! Данный район города не снесли, дороги на месте!
kiev-obolon (2016-09-05 05:41:28+00:00): +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fly_kiev (2016-09-05 05:42:04+00:00): совершенно верно!!
_sev (2016-09-14 07:17:24+00:00): Я откатил эту вандальную правку. Из-за давности, пришлось возиться с ограничениями поворотов. Война правок привела к дубликатам и "висякам". Пожалуйста, больше так не делайте.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:25:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:25:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-07 18:51:58+00:00): Hello! Did you mean highway=track instead high=track on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439844551 ?
Hjart (2016-08-30 11:48:28+00:00): The roads where you added motorcar=yes are public roads? Anyone can legally drive a car here?
dku (2016-08-30 13:06:38+00:00): Hi Hjart
Sorry, now I see that not all of my changes to these roads were correct. But google and mapsMe build routes there.
You can see details to this link - http://eng.nationalparkmolsbjerge.dk/media/nst/10649740/folderkort_bagside_med_flag_tryk.pdf
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:17:41+00:00): Public roads (where the public can legally drive motor vehicles) should be categorized at least as "unclassified" or "residential" regardless of surface (asphalt/gravel etc), so I guess at least some of these should be recategorized. Are you familiar with the area?
dku (2016-08-30 13:20:44+00:00): I honestly don't know. I have not been there - but perhaps you can see this on http://eng.nationalparkmolsbjerge.dk/media/nst/10649740/folderkort_bagside_med_flag_tryk.pdf
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:27:22+00:00): Well, if  you are not familiar with the area, please do not make any changes like these.
Also please note that copying Google Maps is not allowed (plus they actually might be wrong). Maps.me maps are based on OSM, so basing any changes on it is rather silly.
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:29:36+00:00): Also it's often hard to see on maps like the one you're linking to, where you can legally drive a car.
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:30:40+00:00): And I'm also not sure we can legally use it as a source.
dku (2016-08-30 13:30:42+00:00): You propose not to make my changes?
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:31:17+00:00): yes
dku (2016-08-30 13:32:20+00:00): How, then, do I cancel my edits?
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:34:15+00:00): The process for reverting changes is a bit too advanced for most newbies, but I can do it.
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:35:19+00:00): You are a russian, right?
dku (2016-08-30 13:42:42+00:00): No, I am Ukrainian. I am developer of Tourstart.org. I am got message from our user who riding by motorcycle on these roads very often. 
I will be very grateful to you for your help. Please remove my mutations both.
Hjart (2016-08-30 13:45:44+00:00): Oh, I just noticed the locale (se above). Ukrainians use russian locale too?
dku (2016-08-30 13:49:20+00:00): Yes, I am using Russian locale.
Hjart (2016-08-30 14:39:38+00:00): This changeset has now been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41803470. I'll ask a contributor who I suspect is familiar with the area, to have a closer look at access rights etc in the area.
Thank you for closing that gap: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41795167
dku (2016-08-30 14:47:55+00:00): Thanks for assist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
ForstEK (2019-05-20 07:12:54+00:00): Hi, Liprando! Please be careful in typing, i corrected object for you, see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70429115
lostmike (2016-08-30 11:14:18+00:00): Since Windle Bleak Hill is already mapped. Maybe tourism=attraction would be better attached to the existing feature?
MarkusHD (2016-08-31 23:37:12+00:00): Hallo, ich habe diese Änderung gerade rückgängig gemacht, weil dieser Kreisverkehr immer noch ein Minikreisverkehr ist.
changchun_1 (2016-09-01 07:08:31+00:00): Ok, sah bei Bing nach was größerem aus..
Gruß Matthias
MarkusHD (2016-09-01 11:48:33+00:00): Normale Kreisverkehre haben in der Regel Begrünung auf der Insel.
Nakaner (2016-09-01 12:48:41+00:00): Minikreisverkehre haben eine überfahrbare Insel (sind also ein runder weißer Strich in der Mitte der Kreuzung, ggf. mit ein paar Schildern), normale Kreisverkehre leisten etwas mehr Widerstand.
changchun_1 (2016-09-05 15:49:21+00:00): Das passt der Kreisverkehr ist überfahrbar siehe: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=fXLKMxwOBdAL_BB_5mLtKA&lat=49.03791805&lng=8.70079308&z=17
Gruß
Matthias
MarkusHD (2016-09-05 20:03:14+00:00): Das hatte ich ja implizit mit meiner Aussage zum Ausdruck gebracht. Ich dachte, die Definition von mini_roundabout und dass die Größe keine Rolle spielt, wäre bekannt.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:25:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359