piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2021-08-15 07:35:00+00:00): Hi francis kimere,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.57878&lat=11.98088&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109672562

Obviously several street connections have been shifted accidently.

Can you please fix this?
Guido
jeslop (2021-08-14 15:43:13+00:00): Boas tardes de novo e grazas por colaborar con OSM. Segues a borrar lugares que están no Mapa Topográfico Nacional e non explicas por qué. Agradeceriache que o fixeras. Saúdos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Monchinho (2021-08-15 10:09:08+00:00): Ola, bos días. Agardo que todo vaia ben. Os topónimos que borrei que están no MTN é debido a que son incorrectos ou están situados en lugares incorrectos. Algo moi habitual, por outra banda. Son habitante da zona e coñézoos ben. Están oficializados ademais na Plataforma Galicia Nomeada, da Xunta de Galicia, onde se recolleron os topónimos. Iso dálles un carácter oficial, á parte de que, efectivamente, a nivel persoal podo confirmar que así é.

Un saúdo.
jeslop (2021-08-16 12:28:49+00:00): Boas. Non hai ningún problema, sendo fonte oficial e coñecemento do lugar millor que millor. Grazas por responder e pola túa colaboración.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SekeRob (2021-08-14 14:44:05+00:00): PS added a small building near the end of the added path, possibly a refugio.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:29:44+00:00): Olá, não envie linhas sem tags para o OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109673391
hatul (2021-08-17 08:33:15+00:00): שוב, בבקשה לא למחוק את התמונות שלי בשביל התמונות שלך.
adrianojbr (2021-08-18 13:49:44+00:00): Olá, justhelping:). Algumas ideias para melhorar o mapeamento da Rumoto:

1. Faltou definir o tipo principal, geralmente shop=* ou amenity=*. Não conheço um tipo específico para loja de motopeças, assim sugiro usar shop=motorcycle + motorcycle:parts=yes;

2. Para telefone celular, use as mesmas etiquetas para telefone. Não há a etiqueta mobile=*. Assim, pode usar phone=* (padrão antigo) ou contact:phone=* (novo padrão). Se houver mais de um número, separase por ponto-e-vírguala, como é o caso de todas as etiquetas que permitem valores complexos. Ainda, se o número também é Whatsapp, pode ser usada a etiqueta contact:whatsapp; e

3. Para o edifício, a única correção é no formato do CEP, que é usado XXXXX-XXX.

Abraço.
eggie (2021-08-14 20:20:01+00:00): Dag Sascha. Je vraagt feedback. Ik denk dat je barrier=fence 'moet' gebruiken.
Dat hoort op een lijnelement. barier=gate wordt doorgaand op een node getagd verbonden met de weg.
MVG
eggie
chfranca (2021-09-09 13:35:22+00:00): Boa, sabe se existe alguma documentação de diretivas para mapeamento de rodovias?
hatul (2021-08-17 08:08:53+00:00): למה מחקת את התמונות שלי? אתה יכול להוסיף תמונות שלך אבל אין סיבה למחוק תמונות אחרות.
karson_ (2021-08-14 16:49:53+00:00): Just a heads up if you are going to be adding some stuff in the area, Mapbox is the clearest imagery in iD and most features in the area have been aligned to the Mapbox datum
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109676269
archpdx (2021-08-14 18:51:30+00:00): Hi PdxKicker,
It looks like you added duplicate features in this changeset, such as ZoomCare, Maryhill Winery, and Twigs Bistro. In the future, make sure to check if POIs already exist for features you add and move/edit their properties.

I suggest you use an editor that utilizes the name-suggestion-index (NSI) for adding branded companies such as OnPoint and C-TRAN. NSI adds standardized spelling and tags for branded businesses. Some mobile editors include GoMap!! (iOS only), StreetComplete (Android only), and Vespucci (Android only).
PdxKicker (2021-08-14 20:03:15+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. I will use one of the suggested editors for future use, thanks for the suggestions.
Also, is there a tag for Address:Suite that I can utilize? I will need to re-edit these items for their intended suite numbers.
archpdx (2021-08-14 20:08:23+00:00): Thanks for replying! You can use addr:unit for suite numbers
archie (2021-08-14 17:09:50+00:00): Hej, du måste justera bakgrundsbilden (dvs satellitbilden). Satellitbilden stämmer nog, men det krävs att du justerar det. Se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#ID. 
Läs även i wikin vad som står om användandet av name-taggen. name="tomtmark NN" går inte; likaså name="Infart till Karlslund". Var vänlig håll dig till vad som gäller i allmänhet för osm. Läs om detta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-16 12:30:32+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3427255#map=18/53.33873/18.18136 ?
AgusQui (2021-08-15 23:39:32+00:00): Se dibujan calzadas divididas sólo si hay separación físicas entre ellas, cantero, boulevard, guardarail, etc.
meongseolin (2023-10-06 03:12:45+00:00): 现在18路好像停业了，我是不是可以删了？
pbnoxious (2021-08-16 06:31:59+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier Wege gelöscht mit der Begründung, dass sie Privatwege sind.
Bitte beachte dazu auch meinen unbeantworteten (!) Kommentar von vor 6 Monaten: Privatwege werden nicht gelöscht, sondern nur als "privat" eingetragen. Auf Luftbildern erkennbare Wege werden sonst häufig wieder eingetragen und dann eben nicht mit den Korrekten Zutrittsattributen versehen ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99609367 ).

In diesem Fall ist aber auch noch ein Fehler passiert: Beim nördlichen Teil der Straße (( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529663876 ) wurde der "higway"-Tag entfernt, so dass es jetzt nur noch als "unbestimmtes" Objekt eingetragen ist.
Das muss auf jeden Fall berichtigt werden.

Grüße
pbnoxious
muralito (2021-08-15 02:30:32+00:00): Hola. ¿Separaron las calzadas fisicamente en Av. del Libertador? ¿o sigue siendo solo la linea pintada?
AkuAnakTimur (2021-08-14 18:10:10+00:00): Reclassified highways and added/updated places
TrekClimbing (2021-08-14 20:35:30+00:00): What happened to my comment!?
Add detailed footways and crossings around Oxford Road / Otley Road junction.
eggie (2021-08-14 19:09:27+00:00): Dag Overbetuwe Veilig.
WAnneer hier brommers/snorfietsen dootheen mogem dan bijtaggen
moped=yes
mofa=yes

colour=.....?.  Volgens mij doen we alle tagging in het UK English

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-14 19:37:23+00:00): ... en wanneer (nou typen lukte niet helemaal zie ik) een motorfiets er door kan/mag dan ook nog motorcycle=yes bijtaggen svp.
motor_vehicle=no is namelijk default.

MVG
eggie
skyper (2021-08-25 12:19:58+00:00): Hey Olaf
Habe mal versucht die Access-Tags zu verfeinern. Dabei ist mir das Riesgässchen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29223507) als Routinginsel aufgefallen. Entweder braucht es auch da Access-Tags oder die Zu- und Ausfahrt im Norden am Senser Platz sollte angepasst werden.

Viele Grüße
skyper
Joseph R P (2021-08-17 03:56:35+00:00): Hello, dufekin. I took a look at you edits, and I want to ask to please not tag primary Virginia state routes to secondary. The secondary tag is for secondary state routes and unsigned major roads. If you believe a road that is tagged as trunk is not an expressway, consider tagging it to primary instead, because it is still a major route, or more preferred, discuss it on Slack.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:33:51+00:00): Tags inválidas foram removidas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109680903
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:33:57+00:00): Tags inválidas foram removidas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109680903
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:33:58+00:00): Tags inválidas foram removidas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109680903
eggie (2021-08-15 07:14:42+00:00): Beste Wetterhorn.. Ga svp geen mtb paden omtaggen naar fietspaden. het zet de reguliere fietsers op het verkeerde been. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-15 07:19:03+00:00): De oude tagging heb ik teruggezet.
Wetterhorn (2021-08-15 07:28:41+00:00): Die verwarring voor fietsers moet inderdaad niet, maar het pad is niet breed genoeg voor een 4x4 dus aan de voorwaarde voor een track voldoet het ook niet; wat is de beste oplossing?
eggie (2021-08-15 07:33:27+00:00): Hoi,

Ik denk dat highway=path de beste oplossing is.
Maar dan wel even de tracktype=grade4
ook verwijderen, want dat hoort bij een track.
De oversteek bij de splitsing Brandemaatweg en de Weerselose weg heb ik ook op oneway gezet. Had niets van doen met jouw edit.
Succes met omtaggen naar highway=path

MVG
eggie
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109681194
eggie (2021-08-15 07:33:57+00:00): typo. Oversteek heb ik op oneway=no gezet :)
dvdhoven (2021-08-15 06:02:18+00:00): I have set the piece of cycleway back to oneway=no oneway=yes is wrong as cyclists have to go from the north cycleway to Vergertweg.
On aerial photograph you can clearly see that this piece has two directions.

Regards
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2021-08-15 06:47:36+00:00): Beste Wetterhorn.. Waarom deze update? 
bicycleen foot=designated horen niet op een fietspad.
Kijk svp in de wiki welke tags op een fietspad horen.
Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

MVG
eggie

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-15 06:55:07+00:00): Het is nu aangepast aan G11
gr eggie
SGorskiy (2021-08-19 10:04:06+00:00): Не забывайте пожалуйста убирать fixme, если всё впорядке с данными.
В данном случае: fixme=Адрес загружен из ЕГРН, требуется проверка правильности заполнения тегов.
Sparks (2021-09-21 21:46:21+00:00): I wouldn't classify Old Bayside Road and that section of Dalrymple Road as secondary as it doesn't connect two towns together and isn't designed for heavy traffic.
Sparks (2021-09-21 21:47:20+00:00): Opps, wrong edit.
Sparks (2021-09-21 21:48:15+00:00): No, this is the correct edit.
Korgi1 (2021-08-14 20:19:55+00:00): Added building(s) to Incorporated Williams County #MapRoulette
jmsbert (2022-11-01 19:25:51+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
war am Sonntag u.a. in Löningen. Der Weg #61411527 [1] war bis zu Deiner Änderung im August 2021 weitgehend korrekt getaggt, u.a. mit "horse=no" und "traffic_sign=240;257-51". Das "horse=no" wurde entfernt, Weg jedoch explizit gesperrt für Pferde (Extra Schild an "Schwarze Brücke"). Auch bei anderen Wegen fällt mir immer wieder auf, dass dort ein "horse=yes" gesetzt wird. Gemäß StVO ist die Benutzung von Rad/Fußwegen durch Pferde jedoch nicht vorgesehen, siehe z.B. [2],[3]
Daher bitte "horse=yes" bzw. "horse=designated" nur an den Stellen setzen, wo Pferde explizit erlaubt sind.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61411527
[2] https://www.adac.de/verkehr/verkehrssicherheit/tiere/pferde-strassenverkehr/
[3] https://www.pferd-aktuell.de/breitensport/ausreiten-und-ausfahren/gesetzliche-bestimmungen
NGL-engel (2022-11-02 21:16:17+00:00): Hallo jmsbert, 
   Danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde zukünftig besser drauf acht geben. 
Gruß NGL
p.s. auch Danke für Deine Überarbeitungen
jmsbert (2022-11-02 21:33:18+00:00): Hallo NGL, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Bzgl. des Pferde-Taggings würde ich dieses bei Rad/Fußwegen etc. korrigieren, wenn es mir im Einzelfall auffällt und ich mir bzgl. der Beschilderung selbst sicher bin.

Sollte Dir umgekehrt einmal etwas bei meinen Edits auffallen, was Du für einen Fehler hälst gerne Rückmeldung, Gruß aus CLP
skorpion62 (2023-05-07 17:51:10+00:00): Hallo jmsbert,
ich habe horse=no nach vorheriger Kontrolle wieder ergänzt.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
FraukeLeo (2022-10-04 20:50:42+00:00): Hallo navigist, kurzer Hinweis: surface=dirt heißt Matsch. Ein sog. "Schotterweg" mit wassergebundener Oberfläche (so einer ist 40444479) heißt surface=compacted.
zuicz (2021-08-17 18:35:02+00:00): Hm, zarośla to nieużytki pokryte krzewami lub drzewami karłowatymi, ze zdjęć satelitarnych wygląda że są to zwykłe łąki
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:33:27+00:00): Cześć ;) jak pojedziesz sobie tam to wygląda to pół na pół trochę drzewek traw itp jeśli nie mam racji to można to zmienić
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:27:24+00:00): Olá, qual critério você usou para rebaixar a classificação das vias?
Consulte a comunidade local antes de fazer isso.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109683098
complete_gth (2021-08-14 21:11:16+00:00): Buhnen Lagekorrektur nach Bing statt "Flächen von Wegen getrennt"
mueschel (2021-08-19 19:26:03+00:00): Hi,
what does "roof:level = 0-1" mean? This tag isn't used in other places.
Jan
carlosepc (2021-08-22 23:16:51+00:00): Hi, I am testing some specs from Multi-level features and repeated features article in the  wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Etiquetado_de_interior_sencillo
Carto'Cité (2021-12-28 12:50:19+00:00): Bonjour Rbeuque74,
Je retire les aménagements que tu as décrits sur cette portion de route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539975259 car ils sont en doublon avec des éléments déjà décrits de manière séparée. C'est assez classique ce genre d'ajout avec StreetComplete c'est pourquoi c'est une bonne raison pour ajouter cycleway:both=separate pour éviter que StreetComplete invite à compléter une information qui existe déjà. N'hésite pas si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-17 01:11:23+00:00): porque excluiu um trecho da nereu ramos? agora ela é só mao unica neste trecho mesmo?
fgouget (2023-02-05 17:39:15+00:00): Hello,

I get an Osmose error claiming Lesterps is missing an 8MW wind power plant:

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=8270&zoom=17&lat=46.012853&lon=0.793375&issue_uuid=c6eeec8a-1970-f73d-f406-7059c19a4b71&level=1

The reason appears to be that it thinks ref:EU:ENTSOE_EIC = 17W000001410337K instead of 17W000000060560N. Unfortunately I don't know anything about the ENTSOE codes.

Would you know how to resolve this?

Thanks,
dima125 (2021-08-14 22:05:13+00:00): Copy of tracks from strava:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dima125/traces/3781465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dima125/traces/3781312
GinaroZ (2021-08-15 22:13:41+00:00): Hi, just want to check - is the contraflow cycle lane on the west or east side of Queen's Gardens?
JodaStephen (2021-08-16 05:33:57+00:00): The East side. I changed this as the OSM way runs North, thus the cycle lane is on the right
rtbk (2021-08-15 04:50:20+00:00): Trees were incorrectly marked as buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109684564
Glassman (2021-08-22 17:26:41+00:00): Can you look at the landuse=industrial you redrew? Part of it looks like retail space along Main Street and just to the east looks like commercial. At least that how the buildings are tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109685007
Balih00! (2021-08-15 23:14:46+00:00): Nice. This was overdue.
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-09-10 03:46:00+00:00): Rua de Santa Madalena e não Avenida
IgorEliezer (2021-08-30 01:58:11+00:00): Oi, preciso confirmar algo. Esta via é mão única? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790697981
kapibada (2021-08-26 16:49:55+00:00): Cofnąłem Twoją zmianę, ponieważ kiedy zamierzałem sam się tym zająć, zauważyłem, że mnie uprzedziłeś/aś i  popełniłeś/aś błąd typowy dla początkujących - zamiast podzielić drogę na fragmenty (w edytorze online klikasz prawym przyciskiem myszy na skrzyżowanie i wybierasz nożyczki), wywaliłeś/aś całość i narysowałeś/aś prawdopodobnie ze zdjęć satelitarnych, w dodatku dodając nieistniejący chodnikiem. Dodatkowo, choć nie było tego widać na mapie, nie podpiąłeś/aś swojej nowej drogi pod skrzyżowania ani nie wpisałeś/aś nazwy ulicy, co sprawia problemy przy nawigacji. Mi też się na porządku zdarzyło, ale na przyszłość najlepiej uważać, czytać artykuły na wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) o tym, co się robi, i jeżeli nie jest się pewnym - zostawiać w spokoju, moim zdaniem.

A, i nie trzeba pisać komentarzy do changesetów po angielsku, najlepiej w języku lokalnym i dopiero jak nie znasz to w angielskim.
LloydJ (2021-08-26 20:32:39+00:00): Dziekuje za rady i poprawy moj bladow.  Cel byl aby prowadzic ten zmiana droga od dwu-kierunkowy do jedno, ale faktycznie nie wyslo jak trzeba, przede wysztkim pod wgledem ze ten zmiana tylko dotyka czesc ulica Postwan Chlopskich.

Dziekuje ponownie za cierpliwe odpowiedz i pracy.  Przeprasam jeski, jednak, moj polski nie jest tyle latwo czytac jak moj angielski.
mariotomo (2022-05-25 15:10:47+00:00): la descripción del conjunto de cambios no es correcta, pues no solamente alineaste, sino cambiaste nombre poniendo un nombre que parece descriptivo (Víaducto). la tilde en esta posición se ve muy rara. podrías validar tu acción, por favor?
mariotomo (2022-12-30 08:21:14+00:00): algún día? sigues mapeando, pero no vuelves a revisar tus acciones. por favor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109685881
tux67 (2021-08-16 06:07:51+00:00): Hi Glg11,

wenn ich mir das CS in OSMcha ansehe, dann sieht es so aus als hättest du hier wesentlich mehr gemacht, als nur den Kanal nachgetragen. Es sind jede menge Ways und Routen mit angepackt worden. War das beabsichtigt?
Des weiteren hast du (ausser dem automatisch referenzierten Luftbild) keine Quelle für deinen Eintrag angegeben?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109686210
Glg11 (2021-08-17 01:16:33+00:00): Ja, ich hab anhand aktuellere NRW Luftbilder einige Wege nachgezogen. Und Wander-/Reitwege von der alten Bahnlinie Viersen - Neersen separiert.
tux67 (2021-08-17 06:12:12+00:00): Danke - das war aus der Beschreibung nicht so klar.
ZLima12 (2021-08-15 01:39:56+00:00): To expand upon the downgrade from motorway, there is only one grade separation. It's fairly agreed upon that more is necessary to warrant motorway.
mariotomo (2022-12-30 08:19:51+00:00): hola. has borrado un office=government del Instituto Oncológico Nacional. porqué?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109686546
mariotomo (2022-12-30 08:17:49+00:00): hola. revisa qué es un traffic_calming=island.
es cierto, no es un parque, pero tampoco un bosque natural.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109686581
Frans S (2021-08-16 10:00:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. A remark: Please square each rectangular building with the Q key/
Best regards
DressyPear4 (2021-08-15 22:23:16+00:00): Olá, verifique na wiki qual tag se adequa melhor para cada local, mais da metade das coisas que você adicionou não é park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109687274
ftcat (2021-08-20 06:36:07+00:00): Hi EKOTAMIKE,

Please be careful when deleting ways, check they are not part of a relation first, you deleted ways 605687772 and 605786283 which were inner parts of the Bangweulu swamp relation. Not all edits on the map are part of a HOT project.

Thanks
BCNorwich (2021-08-15 07:08:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels  for advice on building levels tagging. I've removed those tags so you can for the correct levels.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height  for advice on building height tagging. Are the buildings 13metres (42 feet) high? I've removed those tags so you can for the correct height.

The whole area is tagged residential so tagging the building as building= residential is duplication. Better to tag as building=house. I've amended these tags. I also squared up the buildings, easily done in the iD editor.

There were two number 2 Aldwickbury Crescent, which I've amended.

I amended 82 Aldwickbury Crescent to 82 Crabtree Lane.

I amended seven addresses from Aldwickbury Crescent to Courtfields.

I removed building type tags as residential is implied.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-08-15 07:38:01+00:00): Hi, 
There's no need to delete the buildings, it's OSM's best practice to correct or amend existing mapping if possible. Thus all mapping history is maintained. deleting also deletes history.

There's no need to repeat data on every object and add POIs. For schools, the main overall data is held on the premises outline. I've amended it to suit OSM practice.

Are the buildings 6 feet high and only 1 floor? I think this is inadvertently incorrect, please see previous comments.

Regards Bernard.
HPDOSM (2021-08-15 08:20:07+00:00): Hi,
Apologies for these mistakes, I will avoid making them next time and as for the heights I will correct now, made a mistake in the calculations.
Thanks
stragu (2021-09-21 13:05:03+00:00): Hi Reubot!
I was wondering about the merging of the address data into the buildings here. I think you were hoping to reduce duplication of information, but as the address was imported from a BCC dataset, I think it would be best kept as a separate node so there is no confusion with what information (and coordinates) the source tag applies to. 
What do you think?
reubot (2021-09-22 04:57:58+00:00): How about if I change the soucre tags to source:addr ?
stragu (2021-09-22 21:41:55+00:00): I guess that would be better, but the issue with changing the precise location of the original address remains. And the consistency for this particular dataset, as it was a big council-wide import. Which is why I think it would be best to keep these separate (node for address, building footprint without an address).
What was the reason for you to merge? If you think about it, building footprints and actual block that has an address can be quite different, so it’s not surprising to have them separate. People also use address nodes to have them closer to an entrance / the street they correspond to, which also makes sense. Less relevant to the area we’re looking at here, but just a general note…
reubot (2021-10-22 03:28:06+00:00): I was trying to reduce the amount of unnecessary nodes. 

Another suggesttion to is to perhaps use BCC land parcels/holdings?

https://www.data.brisbane.qld.gov.au/data/dataset/property-boundaries-parcel
https://www.data.brisbane.qld.gov.au/data/dataset/property-boundaries-holding
BCNorwich (2021-08-15 08:22:12+00:00): Hi, Again really no need to delete things. Several amendments made.

Regards Bernard.
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-15 14:56:27+00:00): Hi Mondal,

do you have local knowledge about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973197832/history ? IMHO it's not a culvert but a bridge above.
Mondal (2021-08-15 16:04:28+00:00): Thank you for your suggestion. One is a bridge, and another will be a culvert.
catonano (2022-01-10 07:42:17+00:00): Che vuol dire "a/b" ?

se è l'attributo di un civico, andrebbe messo nei tag appositi
BCNorwich (2021-08-15 09:12:35+00:00): Hi, I've reinstated the deleted buildings amending the originals to include your new data.

Several other amendments to other buildings.

Regards Bernard.
Patchanka (2021-08-15 16:06:16+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue.
J'ai corrigé quelques erreurs comme par exemple le fait d'indiquer comme nom "hôtel fermé", en effet ce n'est pas un nom tel qu'on l'entend dans OSM (plutôt une explication qui aurait eu sa place dans le commentaire au moment d'enregistrer les modifs).
Vous trouverez sur cette page quelques informations pour vous familiariser avec la contribution dans OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

N'hésitez pas à poser des questions si besoin !
bonne carto
BCNorwich (2021-08-15 17:54:43+00:00): Square up buildings.
tszym (2021-08-18 18:05:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions !
Can you in the future please split your edits by smaller regions ? These changes are really far from each other.
Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109688512