piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ccamara (2017-10-13 08:51:24+00:00): Are you sure that new opening dates are using the right format? AFAIK, they are not right.

Additionally, wikipedi:wikidata is not a valid key. AFAIK, It should be wikidata, as it used to be before.

Could you please check those changes and, in case they are not right, fix them?
cucafera (2017-10-15 09:56:26+00:00): Fixed this (and a few others of mine) incorrect wikidata tag names. Thanks for pointing out.
The opening hours passed the validation tool linked in the corresponding OSM wiki page. Also, see the website if unsure to check if it is incorrect anyway. Feedback welcome.
Thanks.
dieterdreist (2017-11-18 22:24:59+00:00): Hi, why do you think Roma Ostiense is light rail?
dieterdreist (2017-12-08 01:20:03+00:00): or Roma Termini? I believe this is an automated edit, there is no factual background.
dieterdreist (2017-12-08 16:35:20+00:00): Can you please explain, what your sources are?
dieterdreist (2017-12-08 17:54:26+00:00): Roma Tiburtina, Orte, ... 
I'm fixing the problems as I find them, many main stations which are part of the highspeed network have been downgraded to light rail stations in this changeset. No answer so far...
dieterdreist (2021-11-05 11:07:34+00:00): Hi, me again. You can explain why you have added the "station"s on Roma-Albano as "light_rail" while the railway value is "rail" and the route relations "train"?
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-15 07:44:03+00:00): Hi NVillacres, welcome to OSM. 

Thank you very much for your contributions. Some remarks: You can also create several buildings per changeset. You don't have to save each mapped building[1]. Furthermore you could also add some additional "good comments" to your changeset, see [2]. 

Happy mapping!

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-15 10:03:17+00:00): Please have a look at the already existing data!
You added the boundary of Mevlanakapı again and again. But there is already one with right tagging: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7648808
Also please reuse the already existing nodes with the same position. This changesets looks like automatically imports.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52950943
mueschel (2017-10-15 11:05:26+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag " prpois:barrio"? This hasn't been used before. To me it looks like it could be something like "addr:suburb".

Cheers, Jan
vramirez122000 (2017-10-16 15:05:06+00:00): Puerto Rico Municipalities are divided into "barrios". These POIs were geocoded using a simple scheme of Road# KM. The barrio field was used to manually validate the quality of the geocode. That was the theory anyway. In a few cases, the Road KM was just an "idea" of more or less where the POI is located. So I had to do an internet search to get a better address. I agree that the tag can be changed to "addr:suburb".
Cascafico (2017-10-13 21:23:35+00:00): Cos'è?

tourism=wilderness_hut
tourism=alpine_hut
amenity=shelter

Vedi
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI
user_5359 (2017-10-13 18:28:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice there is a difference between description and opening_hours. A days, all hours open business ist marked with 24/7 (like description). But you write 12:00-12:00 (means really 0 minutes, if we assume 12:00am-12:00pm only 12 hours). And please add also a node with amenity=pharmacy.

If you need help: You are welcome.
maxerickson (2017-10-20 13:43:03+00:00): Hi-

Just a little quick feedback - if you aren't sure what something is, it is fine to just leave it out.

Also a couple tips about the editor. When working close to an existing feature, hold down the "alt" key when adding a point to avoid connecting the new feature to the existing feature. 

Also experiment with the "Square" operation, which will square the corners of a feature. It's available in the right click menu or by pressing "s" when a feature is selected. 

Happy mapping,

Max
Hjart (2017-10-13 07:14:01+00:00): Bemærk at hastighedsbegrænsning gennem Hønningkrydset er 70 og ikke 80: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/7uqmeYyEHtgh8NFUmDfXhw
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:13:27+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SomeoneElse (2017-10-13 05:37:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
Please don't add fake data to OSM (there isn't an embassy on the M1 just north of the Derby Road bridge - people would have noticed it).
By all means please add things that aren't currently mapped and really do exist - but don't make things up.
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jtracey (2017-10-13 03:25:37+00:00): ugh did this just break another larger changeset? Feel free to undo this if it's easier, I can figure it out some other time.
GerdP (2017-10-14 06:43:17+00:00): Hi!
I've corrected the unusual highway=parking_aisle
to highway=service. I did not add service=parking_aisle because I don't think that this is their main purpose.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52916811
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
ke9tv (2017-10-14 13:44:42+00:00): ok, thanks, must have been going blind after the number of chdr reviews this week.
4004 (2017-10-13 21:41:10+00:00): Grazie mille,
One note: these roads wouldn't really be classified as residential, because the area is not densely populated/built up, so the correct tag is probably service
4004 (2017-10-13 21:43:24+00:00): actually, one of the roads (stemming from main road) appears to be a drain, so beware
4004 (2017-10-13 21:44:45+00:00): once again, not a residential road, but just a track
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Sphinxiro (2017-10-14 15:22:56+00:00): This has been close in April 2017.
majid1359 (2017-10-13 05:37:36+00:00): اصلاح شد
maraf24 (2017-10-13 12:34:09+00:00): Hej:)
Niemożliwe, by tu były tyle dworców autobusowych mieszczących się w domach.
Dlatego wycofałem te zmiany.
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-02-23 21:09:37+00:00): Приветствую! Хотел бы вас попросить о паре небольших уточнений:
-- Остановка на Великом Гостинце возле ледового дворца называется "Электромодуль" или "Ледовый дворец"? До того там была остановка "Ледовый дворец", но она была некорректно перемещена участником Jay May (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1674193920/history) 

-- Навания остановок возле Молодечненского государственного колледжа так и пишутся на табличках // объявляются в автобусах как "ГМПТК" или у них есть расшифрованное название?
user_5359 (2017-10-13 18:24:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Maiic (2019-06-29 18:57:36+00:00): Ik twijfelde enorm aan dat Roemeense consulaat in Berkel-Enschot (waar ik woon), maar zie hier: http://haga.mae.ro/en/node/845 voor het bewijs!
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:14:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-10-14 06:11:37+00:00): Przypomnę tylko, że na wioskach trzeba stosować addr:place, poprawiłem: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=443021710
majid1359 (2017-10-13 06:54:02+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-13 07:08:21+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-13 07:18:23+00:00): اصلاح شد
Hjart (2017-10-13 07:28:17+00:00): Hvorfor dele den i 2? Der er jo ikke rigtig nogen fysisk adskillelse mellem de 2 baner
Teiron (2017-10-17 21:06:23+00:00): Hej, w jakim sensie tak podaje google?

Bo jak pewnie wiesz tak Google jak i zasady OpenStreetMap surowo zabraniają kopiowania informacji z Google Maps do OSM?
GOwin (2017-10-13 08:37:22+00:00): Hello there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

What are these objects you tagged as amenity=drinking_water?

Do they match the definition found here:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Drinking_Water
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:14:52+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
frosm (2017-10-13 09:02:05+00:00): bonjour
bienvenu sur osm et merci pour votre contribution
pour info, name sert a mettre le nom d'un objet.
pour l'adresse, regardez en mode édition juste en dessous, vous avez des champs ou indiquer le numéro et le nom de la rue
S_Emo (2017-10-13 08:32:25+00:00): Nu online even gekeken naar mijn eigen resultaten. Ik zie dat (nog) niet al mijn (pogingen van) wijzigingen zijn doorgekomen. Het was (in JOSM) gelukt om vloetweg aan blauwstraat te koppelen en fietspad en voetpad (oversteekpunt blauwstraat) te verleggen. Koppeling Vloetweg Loonseweg losgemaakt en verwijderd, maar dat is dus misgegaan....
eggie (2017-10-13 10:36:07+00:00): Ik kijk even..
De "geheime" toetsen  zijn G (losmaken)  M (vastmaken) P -splitsen.
Wanneer je niet loskomt S.
weet je het niet meer dan S  !!
Iets starten A  en som gelijk weer S... dan heb je een node.
eggie (2017-10-13 10:45:44+00:00): Hier is alles goed volgens de validator van JOSM. Wanneer je twee nodes bij elkaar legt en vervolgens M toets gebruikt zit het vast.
eggie (2017-10-13 10:47:23+00:00): Wel oppassen voor de fietsroutes... dat je die niet onderbreekt.
eggie (2017-10-13 10:50:21+00:00): Zorg dat je colorized bicycle routes, wandelknooppuntnetwerken en openbaar vervoer aan hebt staan bij kaarttekenstijlen.
eggie (2017-10-13 10:52:58+00:00): Dat kleine stukje fietspad aan de westkant zou niet eenrichting kunnen zijn, want zo kun je nooit oversteken van Bus naar Vloetweg.
eggie (2017-10-13 11:03:01+00:00): Ja.. De Vloeststraat zit niet aan de blauwstraat. Ik herstel het even.. of draai het evt. terug. Hier lopen allemaal bus en fietsroutes. Wat wil je?
eggie (2017-10-13 11:09:24+00:00): Zolas het er nu uit ziet is zeker de oude situatie waar de Voetweg nog op de Loonseweg uitkomt?
eggie (2017-10-13 11:15:59+00:00): Nou. ruzie met m'n toetsenbord. Dit is geen plek om met JOSM te beginnen. Het stikt van de busroutes en er lopen aan aantal fietsroutes.
Dat is echt ingewikkeld om het goed te krijgen. 
Ik zie op de luchtfoto dat de Vloedweg vanaf nr 41 niet meer op de Loonseweg aansluit. Klopt dat?
eggie (2017-10-13 11:21:44+00:00): Ik kijk vanavond wel even... weer om te fietsen! Als de luchtfoto kadaster pdok 2016 klopt krijg ik het wel goed.
De truc is om de bus- en fietsroutes goed te krijgen.
eggie (2017-10-13 19:49:51+00:00): Voorlopig aangepast, maar het volgende kruispunt zal ook aangepast moeten worden.
eggie (2017-10-13 20:55:31+00:00): Het bleek om wandelroutes en busroutes te gaan.. maar ook dat luistert nauw.
S_Emo (2017-10-13 22:24:04+00:00): Dank je wel Eggie. Ik vorder behoorlijk al zeg ik het zelf. Mede met jou tips en feedback. De busroutes moet ik nog ontdekken. Ik ga de kaarttekenstijlen aanzetten... (cq zoeken, maar dat komt goed). 
Ik kom in Oploo wekelijks een paar keer langs dit punt. Ik zal je veranderingen eens bestudeer om er weer van te leren.
Validatie begin ik ook te begrijpen. Bij landuse kwam ik erachter dat ik een (heel klein) stukje overlap had, en dan begint t te piepen.... met oa. met multipologoon of zoiets... ?!
eggie (2017-10-14 06:40:19+00:00): Hier "moet" alleen de bebording nog gecheckt worden en eenrichting. Nu heb ik het op de meest logische manier gedaan, maar niets is logisch als het over fietspaden gaat. 
Routeren doet het nu wel. Was nog een stuk vergeten om de rijbaan op bicycle=use_sidepath te zetten. Nu ook gebeurd.
Met de Openfietsmap check ik dan de routering. www.openfietsmap.nl
Draait in basecamp en garmin apparatuur.
Elke zaterdag update. 
Alle lijnen worden polygonen genoemd. Elementen van lijnen die in een relatie staan tot elkaar heten multipolygonen.
Voorbeeld. ..Een bos in een vlak van gras. Een eilandje in een vlak van natural=water.
Dat luistert nauw. Zonder MP relaties zie je op de afgeleide kaarten dat eilandje niet.
De sportvelden in Oploo staan bv in een Multi anders zou je ze niet zien op de OFM.
Die kun je als voorbeeld nemen.
Je komt er wel achter :)
eggie (2017-10-14 06:45:20+00:00): nee dus, maar dat stukje bos in het midden wel.
S_Emo (2017-10-14 07:00:44+00:00): Je bent er maar druk mee :) Ik heb colorized bicycle routes, wandelknooppuntnetwerken en openbaar vervoer bij kaarttekenstijlen gevonden en aangezet.

Begrijp ik het goed, dat je Bicyle=use_sidepath gebruikt als het weggedeelte eruit ziet als lokaal, en dat (soms) brommers etc wel erop mogen, maar fietsers niet ?! Eigenlijk is het dubbele info als er toch een fietspad ligt, maar ik neem aan dat dit nodig is voor OSM routeplanners etc. Goede tip van Basecamp. Heb ik ook al wel eens paar jaar geleden gebruikt met OSM fietsmap. 
En ik ga de sportvelden bekijken :)
eggie (2017-10-14 13:48:44+00:00): bicycle=use_sidepath hoort dus op de rijbaan waar de auto's rijden! De routeplanner / gps zou anders ook over de rijbaan routeren en dat is niet de bedoeling.
bicycle=no wordt ook toegpast op de rijbaan, maar dan alleen als er het witte bord met de rode rand staat en het fietsje in het midden.
Meestal N wegen.
We taggen het fietspad als G11, G12a of G13
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=yes, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

Het verkeersbord is niet verplicht, maar wel handig voor andere mappers.
Ook zijn er kaarten waar je de verkeerborden op ziet.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~peewee32/traffic_sign/traffic_sign.htm?map=cycleways&zoom=13&lat=51.81238&lon=4.69555&layers=0B0FTTTTFTFTTTFFFFFFFFFF
eggie (2017-10-14 13:51:20+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld in de buurt dat met MP's is gemaakt.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.61037/5.92348
S_Emo (2017-10-14 19:41:26+00:00): Perfect. De namen / codes van de verkeersborden, die had ik al gegoogled, maar zo is wel zo handig allemaal bij elkaar. Nog aandig wat aan te passen straks als die nieuwe rondweg klaar is. Ik ben op tijd begonnen, en denk/hoop zo in het najaar (?) rond te hebben..... (als i dan is opgeleverd....)
eggie (2017-10-14 20:30:45+00:00): 'k heb er wel vertrouwen in dat deze hoek van Nederland zeer actueel zal blijven :)
JJIglesias (2017-10-13 08:09:43+00:00): Saludos por favor estar pendiente de lo siguiente: Que dos vias se crucen NO significa que esten conectadas SINO hay un Nodo (punto) oscuro, si el punto de conexion es Blanco entonces NO hay enlace entre las vias. Si usas ID por favor coloca la superficie de la via, normalmente es UNPAVED, e igualmente la imagen satelital de fondo mas completas son la de Bing y la de Digital Globe Premium.
Gracias por contribuir con OSM
Slds
JJ
Hjart (2017-10-13 08:11:51+00:00): To me cuisine=steak_house is more of a misspell than cuisine=steaks
thetornado76 (2017-10-13 20:31:14+00:00): Maybe is misspell not the correct wording for this changeset. But steak_house is the accepted Tag.
Hjart (2017-10-13 20:35:35+00:00): I'll agree it's the most commonly used tag, but I'd still say it's a mistake. I've allowed myself to retag them cuisine=steak, which is less common, but still has 500+ uses.
thetornado76 (2017-10-13 20:56:32+00:00): Okay
literan (2017-10-13 12:23:16+00:00): по поводу https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4939724421 и соседнего киоска - вроде ж договорились на форуме, что это не названия, а просто надписи на магазинах,описывающие ассортимент (не говоря уж о том, что слово "мороженое" с одной "н" пишется ;-) ) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.B4.D1.85.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.BA_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F.D0.BC_.D1.84.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.BC.D0.B0.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BD.D0.BE
eggie (2017-10-13 09:52:16+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-13 09:59:58+00:00): Reverted...
This is not correct. nr 17 is at the odd site of the road. All address-nodes are imported from the kadaster. You can report at the site of the Kadaster.  https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=beatrijsstraat%2017&resultOffset=0&objectId=0599100000606490&geometry.x=91103.367400512&geometry.y=437349.0015982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
eggie (2017-10-13 10:09:13+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52881518
Heinz_V (2019-01-20 12:09:39+00:00): You made here a lot of isolated nodes.
Please delete them.
eggie (2017-10-13 10:01:35+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd