piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:01:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
fishcharlie (2021-04-04 22:29:03+00:00): When moving a node to a way, please make sure to move over all relevant tags. Lots of detail and information was lost in this changeset.
AasmaK (2021-06-01 07:20:39+00:00): Noted. Thank you for the feedback.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
trapicki (2021-10-22 05:37:57+00:00): You did move the very important access restriction on the Rettenbachklamm-Wanderweg to the notes, which makes this only a hint to editors. Can you explain a little why this would be better than having it in tag access?
At way 194938864 you added access=private, which makes this bypass to Rettenbachklamm non-routeable. You did not state a source. Did you survey this?
Jorisbo (2021-10-24 07:06:45+00:00): Hi trapicki! Thank you for the comments. It is/was for automated routing improvements that i updated things. The private-track missing/routing piece did the opposite of course and is a failure. I set back the routing notes to access:conditional (instead of access). Thanks again, Kind regards Joris
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
sskalyan (2021-03-11 14:22:21+00:00): Hi,

Is there any reason for deleting link roads along the length of Eubank Boulevard Northeast, https://snipboard.io/LQ2bFp.jpg please refer to this screenshot for missing roads/links. According to our internal resources as of Feb-26, roads exist. Kindly share some background behind this change. 

Thanks,
Kalyan
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ScantLeopard336 (2021-03-13 04:32:23+00:00): I have read the wiki definition of leisure=park several times and am aware it differs from the western US definition of a park. With that said, several places that had the park tag removed like Riker Hill Art Park, the Essex County Environmental Center and Essex Golf Center within West Essex Park, and the central part of Becker Park I feel fall within the "human-sculpted landscape" requirement for the park tag. What is your recommendation to improve the tags for these?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 06:36:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 06:36:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-02 07:28:59+00:00): Are you sure that removing leisure=park from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894089226/history is correct?

It seems to look like an urban park to me, fitting leisure=park definition.

Also, is it really some nature reserve? 1/4 seems taken by sport fields
Amigo (2021-07-27 10:18:44+00:00): А зачем переименовали Тойота Центр Шереметьево?
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
pbnoxious (2021-03-10 09:59:21+00:00): What makes you believe this is an "unmaintained track road"?
This is just the paved (!) vicinity around an storage / industrial building (private property). And the western end is not actually connected to the "main" track, you can even see this in the aerial imagery.
peddil (2021-03-10 13:18:31+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits.  I have added track road since the road is falling in farm lands, from your comment I realized that it is an industrial building .please let me know if the road need to upgraded to a service or track with grade1. please suggest with the appropriate change. always happy to learn from the community
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
abakus_uploader (2021-03-10 23:32:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GerdP (2024-07-07 14:06:42+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier seinerzeit den Knotenpunkt 46  https://www.osm.org/node/291696066
dem Netz von Ammerland zugeordnet. Auf dieser Karte am Knotenpunkt 83 https://www.osm.org/node/12039384120 wird er so dargestellt, als ob er zum Landkreis Cloppenburg gehört. Auf der Karte am Knotenpunkt 42 (Ammerland)  https://www.osm.org/node/12039989401 wird er als Nachbarknoten (anders) dargestellt und es ist keine Route zum Knoten 46 dargestellt und es ist auch keine ausgeschildert. Ich denke also, der Knoten 46 gehört ins Netz von Cloppenburg. Da Du aber source=knowledge angegeben hast, frage ich lieber noch mal nach, was Du dazu sagst. Vielleicht hat sich das ja auch in der Zwischenzeit geändert?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
parsd51 (2021-03-10 13:43:38+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Jeg har kigget på SDFE 2020 og Mapillary fra juni 2020.

Såvidt jeg kan se er der 2-4 lanes her, afhængig af hvordan jeg tæller. Jeg vil nok sætte den til to, de andre er "halve baner" og uden turn:lanes. Justering?

De to på hver side kan jeg kun få til 2, som de var før.
turn:lanes på den væk fra krydset, skulle tages væk og den ved krydset være through|through.

Er der noget jeg har overset?

Hilsen
parsd51
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
abakus_uploader (2021-03-10 23:32:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Carnildo (2021-03-11 06:32:50+00:00): You're using the wrong sort of gate tag here: the tag you're using is for these: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/JesusGreenLock-Cambridge.jpg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
osmviborg (2021-03-10 08:36:47+00:00): Hej. Tag's rettet til:
highway=construction
construction=cycleway
peterleth (2021-03-10 08:52:24+00:00): Tak . Jeg forsøgte at benytte construction tagget fordi den ikke er inviet endnu - men det nærmer sig (derfor har jeg været ude med Mapillary på strækningen, sådan at vi kan følge arbejdet).
osmviborg (2021-03-10 10:31:45+00:00): Jeg havde ikke set dine billeder. Baseret på billederne, ville jeg erklære den "indviet". Den bliver garanteret allerede benyttet. Du får fornøjelsen :-)
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
andi9876 (2021-03-18 05:38:34+00:00): Hi. Here no oneways, but look restrictions,
Reverted.
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-15 17:52:39+00:00): Bonjour,
vous semblez avoir retiré le "private" du parking. Ce parking est-il accessible à tout le monde maintenant ?
Bonne journée
Cpiarrou (2021-03-15 19:04:28+00:00): Erreur de débutant, désolé et c'est corrigé (normalement...)
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-19 17:13:39+00:00): Merci :)
Sree1922 (2021-03-10 08:20:02+00:00): Here I have used Esri World Imagery
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Константин Гам (2021-03-10 13:02:01+00:00): "Пробегаясь по заметкам" надо ещё на местности посмотреть, что вы создали... Не надо так, пожалуйста. Создавать несуществующие точки или дубли - лишнее.
maxbe (2021-03-21 18:46:43+00:00): Hi redweizn,
auf der M3 darf man radfahren und zu Fuß gehen, jedenfalls als ich das das letzte Mal nachgesehn hab. bicycle=no und foot=no gehört nur dort hin, wo es  verboten ist, nicht dort, wo man es für nicht schön oder ungeeignet hält.
Grüße, Max
redweizn (2021-03-21 19:18:59+00:00): Hallo Max. Danke. Schau da auch nochmal nach. Auf jeden Fall da ungeeignet zum spazieren aber um das geht's ja nicht. 😉 Schönen Sonntag
Pt873 (2021-03-10 18:21:05+00:00): Oi, tudo bem? A região da Fonte do Bispo foi reformada há alguns meses, não existem mais essas vias que foram adicionadas, mas sim uma praça. A área já havia sido editada com as correções necessárias. :)
nurdiana_ui (2021-03-22 02:48:50+00:00): Ok, desculpe pelo meu erro e obrigado pela informação :)
abrensch (2021-09-19 07:47:28+00:00): Hi Victor,

is this an ongoing construction-work with a road block? Or expired?

thanx, Arndt
Victor Yarema (2021-09-19 10:37:19+00:00): Hello Arndt.
It was temporarily closed for some road work. But now it is open. Literally yesterday I was driving there. I just forgot to mark it as open again. Thank you so much for being so attentive.
BR, Victor
bielebog (2021-03-18 17:10:00+00:00): Hi Mareike1,

hier ist ein Weg weggekommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457096864
Das war sicherlich ein Versehen. Kannst Du den selber wieder herstellen?
Mareike1 (2021-03-23 08:18:09+00:00): Hallo bielebog,

ja, das war ein Versehen. Danke fürs Anmerken!
eggie (2021-03-10 09:31:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
muchichka_s (2021-03-10 12:07:01+00:00): До речі сільські ради залишилися, в сільських громадах так називаються органи самоврядування.

Але для чого видаляти церкву?
G_P_J (2021-03-21 23:10:38+00:00): Adresy w miejscowościach bez ulicy powinny zawierać nazwę miejscowości w tagu addr:place zamiast addr:city. Poprawiam.
eggie (2021-03-10 09:39:03+00:00): Dag guido.. Er zitten nogal wat paden nog steeds vastgeplakt aan de landuse.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-10 09:46:48+00:00): Maar even wat losgemaakt..
eggie (2021-03-10 09:48:47+00:00): Voorgaande mapper een berichtje gestuurd.
guido-vh (2021-03-10 11:03:02+00:00): Hallo eggie,
de voorgaande mapper (3dshapes?) heeft idd alles aan elkaar geplakt. Ik begreep dat er meerdere 'scholen' zijn in OSM-land, jij bent van de losse paden maar de voorgaande mapper is blijkbaar van de paden op de grens plaatsen.
Heb ik dat doorgetrokken pad kruisend de Bosstraat goed ingetekend?
eggie (2021-03-10 11:19:38+00:00): We zijn in OSM Nederland allemaal van de school van paden en wegen loshouden van de landuse.
In Duitsland lopen sommige mappers wat uit de pas, maar ik weet niet of ze daar zo blij mee moeten zijn. 
Plakken is een ramp en dat is de algemene mening van Ned community. 
De paden liggen verder goed hier.
Kruisende wegen zitten keurig aan elkaar vast. 
Je edits.. Soms is het lastig te zien wat iemand heeft gedaan. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100765583

Wat ik heb gedaan is gewoon de landuse geselecteerd en op de G toets gedrukt in josm. Dan ligt de landuse weer los.
eggie (2021-03-10 11:27:19+00:00): De changeset van de voorgaande mapper..  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38988550

3dshapes is een import geweest van jaren terug van grondgebruik. 
Die kun je gerust aanpassen, want dat is allemaal grotendeels achterhaald. 3dshapes vervang je dan als bron voor bv local_knowledge of Pdok.
3dshapes zit nooit aan wegen vast. Dat doen sommige mappers..  :)
guido-vh (2021-03-10 11:29:20+00:00): Kan dat globaal losmaken ook in iD?
Want ik moest het per knooppunt en weg doen, je ziet binnen iD geen relaties. Je ziet wel dat je een weg niet kan wijzigen als je de landuse-layer uit hebt staan.
eggie (2021-03-10 11:35:53+00:00): Even geen iD  Ik kijk eigenlijk nooit naar iD. De meeste forum mappers beschouwen JOSM als de standaard editor en zien iD als een speeltje. 
Denk met de rechtermuis klikken op de lijn en dan krijg je een menu in beeld. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710      

Een aanrader...
eggie (2021-03-10 11:39:19+00:00): Inderdaad.. recht klikken na selectie met de linkermuis. En dan kiezen voor die twee pijltjes uit elkaar.
Editor ID is wel een stuk beter geworden, maar niet echt geschikt voor ingewikkelde zaken en zeker niet voor wegen bewerken met routerelaties. Dat geeft dan schade. 
Zou zeker een overstap wagen. het lijkt dan even weer lastig(net of je opnieuw begint) , maar daar moet iedereen even doorheen.
guido-vh (2021-03-10 15:25:30+00:00): Eggie, ik heb ondertussen JOSM geinstalleerd. Ik kom er behoorlijk uit qua lagen en stijlen en exporteren. Ik kijk nog wat rond en dan kom ik hierna met aanpassingen via JOSM.
eggie (2021-03-10 16:02:27+00:00): Mocht je vragen hebben laat maar weten. 
Als kaartstijlen heb ik
als Potlatch  2 (was ik gewend)
colorize bicycleroutes
wandelknooppunten
Openbaar Vervoer,

Maar je kan het zo gek maken als je wilt.

Voor de betere achtergronden nog wat leesvoer
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

Succes,
eggie (2021-03-10 09:35:26+00:00): Dag Otto.. 
Prima om zaken aan te vullen. 
Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gewijzigd. Dit is van belang voor andere lokale mappers. 

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
kumrnls (2021-03-11 07:44:37+00:00): Thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the existence of road based on the available imagery from your comment, I have realized that the road is abolished post the construction. it is good to see the community improvising our edits. thanks for the quick correction. always happy to learn from the community