piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2022-09-23 08:57:11+00:00): Hello ChehrehBargi,          
First of all there is no monument here. 
2nd of all this places is not registered officially, therefore by Iraqi law this is illegal to have a named place that is unregistered.      
3rd of all, you can not say "رجل شجاع مثل أبو مهدي المهندس الذي حاربهم بشجاعة خلال الهجوم البريطاني" etc. (translate to: "like the brave Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis who fought the British") The guy you mentioned "Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis" is a terrorist on the international terrorist list! such name should never be mentioned in OSM!            
I will revert this changeset. I would suggest considering contacting local mappers from this country before doing such problematic edits.          
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-23 17:01:50+00:00): It is your political leanings that are the problem. Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis is not a terrorist and is a source of pride for Iraq. You have no right to insult the honor of a country. In addition, the majesty of Hazrat Saheb al-Zaman Ajjullah Farjah and Imam Sadiq (peace be upon him) and the tombs of Hazrat Hud and Saleh (peace be upon him) are all historical. The fact that you don't believe in Shiite imams does not prove that they are not historical. You are not allowed to impose your own taste on the map that all the people of the world work hard for.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-23 17:21:28+00:00): I'm Iraqi and no he is not a "source of pride" or "honor of a country". He is a terrorist, read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Mahdi_al-Muhandis
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-23 17:38:30+00:00): We both know what the truth is. Wikipedia does not respect fairness and truth in political matters and you know this very well.
Neither you nor I have the right to follow personal preferences in the map. According to wiki rules, I have the right to register any fixed object on the ground, and if it has its name listed by an official board, or if not, with local people's information, to register its name as well.
marczoutendijk (2022-09-30 07:49:55+00:00): Is this realy the way that building is built?  It doesn't look so on aerial imagery!
Most of your buildings have that strange outline, why?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
trial (2022-11-08 22:48:23+00:00): Bonjour, au vu du cadastre et de l'orthophoto, cette rue semble certes sans issue mais publique.
DST-Noyarey (2022-11-09 13:18:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Le cadastre est un document fiscal qui ne permet ni de définir les limites d'un bien, ni sa propriété.
Par ailleurs, cette voie est constituée d'une parcelle cadastrée (AO165) qui est in indice de plus de son coté privé.

La parcelle AO149 a fait l'objet d'une enquete publique pour intégration dans le domaine public fin 2014.
Elle a été intégré dans le domaine public à l'issue de cette enquete publique.
Le cadastre n'est donc pas à jour pour cette parcelle.
DST-Noyarey (2022-11-09 13:19:10+00:00): Il y a donc une différence entre AO165 = privée
et AO149 = public
Cela correspond bien à ce qu'on peut lire sur OSM.
trial (2022-11-09 20:11:35+00:00): Réponse parfaite (contenu et délai). Merci. Sauf qu’une imagerie non libre datant de 2022 n’indique rien sur le terrain quant à la différence de statut. Oui indice car dans les lotissements la voirie cédée au public est souvent cadastrée, à l’exemple de la AO149.
DST-Noyarey (2022-11-10 08:41:49+00:00): Absolument, et au delà du statut privé de cette voie en termes de propriété, dans la mesure où elle est ouverte au public, le code de la route s'y applique. Elle est ainsi considérée comme publique à de nombreux titre, mais pas en terme de propriété (avec la charge de l'entretien qui reste au propriétaire).
Syl (2022-09-23 12:38:10+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue, j'ai enlevé la zone résidentielle que vous avez ajouté, elle se superposait à celles déjà existantes et n'avait pas l'air de correspondre à quelque chose d'existant sur le terrain.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-20 13:11:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097196968/history

is it under construction? It looks like ruins to me, but not fully sure
Snusmumriken (2022-09-23 11:08:57+00:00): Hej

Jag undrar om förändringen du gjorde för objektet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968106256
stämmer?

Dvs. att det är en allmän väg där bilar har företräde?
TheFejkBatch Postnord (2022-09-23 11:26:19+00:00): Hej, Hade lite svårt att se på kartan då det är en rätt nybyggd del. Jag ändrade om till Serviceväg då jag kollade igenom igen och rådfrågade med mina kollegor. Så jag hoppas det blir rätt! Tack
APneunzehn74 (2022-11-13 18:11:40+00:00): Wieso hast du diese beiden Haltestellen an ein andere Stelle verschoben? 
Ich habe sie jetzt wieder an die richtige zurückgesetzt.
Grüße APneuzehn74.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
flohoff (2022-09-23 10:11:13+00:00): Moin,
Bezüglich der änderung in Rheda.  Warum hast du das alte gelöscht und neu eingetragen? 

Dazu noch die Fläche jetzt mit Straßen und anderen Objekten verklebt. Ich werde das mal nachbearbeiten.

Flo
flohoff (2022-09-23 10:13:02+00:00): Ach ja - warum hast du auf dem Parkplatz vom Freibad noch einen node mit der Caravan Site hinterlassen? Ist das jetzt auch konvertiert worden?

Flo
flohoff (2022-09-23 10:14:58+00:00): Dann die änderung in Rietberg. Das ist jetzt nur eine Linie. Das macht ja wenig sinn das die "caravan_site" eine linie ist. 

Dazu kommt das das zu nichts im Luftbild passt. 

Guck dir das nochmal an.

Flo
flohoff (2022-09-23 10:15:31+00:00): Ach ja - Und der Stellplatz ist von HolgerJeronimo ja schon eingetragen gewesen. Vielleicht magst du den einfach ergänzen.
flohoff (2022-09-24 15:00:01+00:00): Moin,
ich war gestern nochmal am Werl und habe Mapillary Fotos gemacht. U.a. hab ich die Pömpel zwischen Werl und Parkplatz des Freibades mal wieder eingetragen, und den Caravan Site node auf dem Parkplatz des Freibades/Sportplatzes entfernt. Und dann noch ein paar Wege vom Werl zu der Straße "Am Werl" die eigentlich zu eng für Autos/WoMos sind zu highway=path konvertiert.

Flo
flohoff (2022-09-24 15:02:08+00:00): 
Ach ja - ich habe deine anderen änderungen mal durchgesehen. 

Könntest du dir angewöhnen in den Changeset kommentar was sinnvolles zu schreiban als Monat/Jahr? 

Interessant ist WAS und WO du etwas verändert oder hinzugefügt hast und auf welcher Basis.
highflyer74 (2022-09-26 18:08:28+00:00): @flohoff: OSMI schmeißt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097225592 auch noch einen Fehler, weil sich der Weg überlappt und das irgendwie überhaupt nicht passt. Ich hätte es gefixt, wollte dich aber nicht in einem evtl. Revert behindern. @planer24 meldet sich ja leider nicht. Schönen Abend!
flohoff (2022-09-26 21:53:01+00:00): 
Ich habe den Caravanstellplatz in Rheda schon korrigiert weil ich da täglich dran vorbei kommen und hab auch noch Mapillary Bilder gemacht.

 Das in in Rietberg ist auch ziemlich kaputt das kenne ich aber nicht - oder nur vom Vorbeifahren alle halbe Jahr mal.

Flo
flohoff (2022-09-27 08:37:08+00:00): Highflyer hats gelöscht nachdem es im OSMI rot wurde:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126679008
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
FinleyJones (2022-09-23 14:11:00+00:00): Park does not encompass whole Mayfield development, only covering area of now deleted way. 
Changes should be reverted as soon as possible and the old way should simply have the construction tag removed with the construction way altered to not include the park
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Tomasz Herud (2024-02-16 09:14:18+00:00): Hej, czy 3 stanowiska przystankowe przy Krakowskiej jeszcze istnieją? Chyba po otwarciu CP one zniknęły.
mavl (2022-09-24 06:18:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет Ялуторовский острог как туристический объект. Этот острог уже обозначен на карте:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14025405  
  
Одного объекта достаточно.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
mavl (2022-09-24 06:21:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет на карту номер дома 19а. В OpenStreetMap в номерах домов используют большие буквы - 19А.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-09-25 14:13:57+00:00): Добрый день.

>Created a chalet
>name=Пень
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10046985317

Что за "Пень"?
aceman444 (2023-01-08 16:17:03+00:00): No neviem, urobit z tych bast budovy je zaujimavy napad (ale nemaju cisla, takze minimalne kataster to ako budovy nevidi), ale OK. Ale zbytocne ich posuvat voci katastru na nespravne polohy a vyrabat multipolygony na city_walls, ktore su nepotrebne, velmi prinosne nevyzera. Inak multipolygon z principu area=yes nepotrebuje.
Strubbl (2022-09-23 10:20:35+00:00): siehe auch CS Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126278309
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-12-06 15:16:06+00:00): check
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
arvdk (2022-12-05 12:38:35+00:00): Maar wel een voetpad toch? Ik teken wel een voetpad in.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-23 13:23:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar gebouwen zijn een van de weinige zaken die we importeren vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)  Daar beter niet iets aan veranderen.
Bij een herimport gaat het hier verkeerd en de vorm van de gebouwen klopt ook niet meer .
Instellingen taggen we zoveel mogelijk op de adresnodes.  Die heb je verwijderd.
Nog iets...  Ga nu eens ingedachten met een auto die parkeerplaats op. Hoe kom je er ooit weer af met eenrichtingverkeer? :)

Ik zal wat herstellen


Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126540958

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-23 13:33:38+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld middels revert..  Achtergrondfoto BING ligt verschoven Gebruik svp PDOK actueel 7,5 cm. 
De BAG ziet de hal als één gebouw. De info van de fitness staat op de adresnode. 
De oneway-issue heb ik opgelost. 
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-09-23 13:35:00+00:00): Aanvulling.. Ook geen gebouwen gaan aanpassen mbv de daken  op luchtfoto's Daar staat het gebouw niet.
ashs_as (2022-09-26 09:46:43+00:00): Dear smile hope
please be aware that I did change the area here depending on a significantly updated Maxar imagery so please revert your changes to my changes.
Thank you
ashs_as
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-28 10:01:06+00:00): Please don't add same information on the building and as separate node inside the building. Will remove it from the building.
Carto_Graph (2022-09-23 13:38:43+00:00): Что вы добавили?
eggie (2022-09-23 13:41:53+00:00): Oke András . maar liever geen dubbele adressen in OSM. Er is al een adresnode. 

MVG
eggie
kmpoppe (2024-12-29 07:42:07+00:00): Hi Bob!

With this CS, you changed the (I would guess) closed EAT. into a Sage Vegan, but didn't remove the brand:wikipedia tag that still points to the old brand. Can this be removed?

K
neo-plan (2022-09-25 15:33:20+00:00): В двух местах рядом получился этот замок. Какое правильное?
RaseLk (2022-09-25 15:49:15+00:00): Он в этом месте и есть. Когда добавлял, второй не отображался, а сейчас получается их два на карте.
alyaa_hossam (2022-09-26 12:16:50+00:00): Dear gb63
I did review your work and found 853 duplicated buildings and highways, which I did fix, you can check your work before uploading by using the JOSM validation tool, please let me know if you need help
Thank you
alyaa_hossam
eggie (2022-09-23 13:43:34+00:00): Tip Gebruik PDOK actueel 7,5 cm als achtergrond. Die is actueel.. 2022

MVG
eggie
AngocA (2024-09-03 22:35:03+00:00): Hola

Veo que agregaste direcciones, pero en vez de usar la palabra Carrera, pusiste Race en Victoria (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7428522/history). Hablas español? o solo inglés?

Just tell me.

Andrés Gómez
eggie (2022-09-23 13:47:51+00:00): De Speeltuin heb ik uit het monument verwijderd.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-23 13:56:22+00:00): Mocht het wel een speeltuin zijn .. laat het dan even weten. Dan verander ik het terug
Groet
eggie