piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2019-04-25 05:42:01+00:00): When mapping in Denmark, please make sure to use our national SDFE aerial imagery (available in JOSM), which is both newer, better quality and slightly better aligned than Mapbox, Bing etc
Amonite1025 (2019-04-25 20:10:54+00:00): Thank you! I will use the SDFE imagery in the future
Chris Fleming (2019-04-29 10:00:16+00:00): Hi, what's your source for this?
DavidKewley (2019-05-23 19:24:47+00:00): I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.
DavidKewley (2019-05-23 19:24:52+00:00): I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.
viloan (2019-04-25 00:20:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
saintam1 (2019-04-28 08:03:41+00:00): Beautiful work 👍
Araucaria_araucana (2019-04-29 17:33:34+00:00): Thanks!
viloan (2019-04-25 01:32:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DavidKewley (2019-05-23 19:26:28+00:00): I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.
mapman44 (2020-03-16 13:47:35+00:00): Osmose is indicating a number of segments of I-84 in this changeset as being on layer 1 (like a bridge) although they are at ground level. Is there a reason for this? Also history shows them as being Version 1 edits. Were original segments deleted and re-drawn, thus losing the history of the original segments?
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-16 13:51:24+00:00): It wasn't deleted and redrawn, it may have crept in from a join and retag since I'm not usually looking for or expecting layer=1, 0 or -1 in places where the layer=* tag isn't necessary because the implicit values for bridge=yes, tunnel=yes or an absence of both are sufficient.
mapman44 (2020-03-16 13:57:11+00:00): OK, but why are they version 1 objects?
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-16 14:04:32+00:00): Splits?  Splitting a way leaves one way with the history and creates a new way.  There's multiple changes in lane count, speed limit, advised speed, and more that would have necessitated splits.
mapman44 (2020-03-16 14:13:48+00:00): No these edits are on I-84 that has had dual carriageways for years before your edits.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-16 14:26:37+00:00): yes, I understand that. I'm starting to wonder if you know what splitting a way is?  It takes one way, and creates two ways, so you can have different tags on different sections of road to describe what's going on...
mapman44 (2020-03-16 14:32:46+00:00): I definitely know what a split is and what it involves, and that simply doesn't explain the edits I'm looking at. I'm not going to pursue this conversation any further. I'll just fix the errors and move on.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-16 15:03:04+00:00): OK, apparently we're not on the same page here. Is it just the layer=* tags that are wrong or is there something else?
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-30 14:16:55+00:00): Hey Ezekiel,

Please read the note on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112648294 

The current state in real world matches Esri imagery but not Bing.

Your edit moved the path to match Bing which means it is now incorrect.

Could you please correct it? Thanks
Geography Canada (2019-04-30 21:46:15+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention :). So let me get this straight... Andrew edited it to match Bing imagery, then you edited it to match Esri imagery, and then I edited it to match Bing imagery?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-30 23:14:12+00:00): Yes - but note that Andrew's edit was in 2011 and mine was in 2019 after I surveyed in 2019.
Geography Canada (2019-04-30 23:16:06+00:00): Thanks, I'll work on fixing this after I (at least attempt to) fix the long-standing Crothers Woods problem...
Geography Canada (2019-05-02 02:15:06+00:00): The path got fixed to Esri World Imagery in my latest changeset (#69786488), see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69786488. Thanks!
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:54:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:56+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:49+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:41+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:37+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
ejont (2019-04-25 11:03:11+00:00): Hello!
You deleted part of a powerline here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118251105
ejont (2019-04-27 08:21:50+00:00): partly reverted
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:28+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Kartenziegel (2019-05-25 22:38:10+00:00): Deletion executed.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:50:08+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Alecs01 (2019-04-28 10:01:42+00:00): Ciao, l'ho taggata con disused:amenity, altrimenti nel database risulta come una stazione di servizio attiva.
thomas hermant (2019-04-27 19:38:12+00:00): Images Bing
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:49:54+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Negreheb (2019-07-07 18:50:05+00:00): Hallo Geoton, vielleicht übersehen, aber die Adresse war bereits an der Eingangstür getagged. Nach möglichkeit auch keine Abkürzungen benutzen bei Straßennamen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 :)

Ich hab das ganze mal korregiert und die Raiologie auch soweit als möglich korrekt eingetragen.
Danysan95 (2019-04-25 07:49:37+00:00): Prima di inserire una strada che sembra esserci da satellite dovresti controllare che esista realmente.
La strada che hai aggiunto in questo changeset non collega le due strade, ma si collega con una sola ed è uno stradello di accesso alle case, non una strada residenziale.
L'ho corretto nel changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69552303 .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69550654
jguthula (2019-04-30 16:57:21+00:00): Hi Danysan95,

Thanks for looking into this edit. This is a pure blunder from our editor and we communicated the same as well. The satellite imageries are not clear and there is another building next to this road end so the editor got confused with the connection. Will note your feedback seriously and will communicate to my team on not repeating such errors going forward.

Please do let us know if there are any other errors being generated from my teams end. We are actively looking forward to work along with the local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:49:23+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:49:15+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-25 08:51:06+00:00): Co oznacza to HP?

Hydrant Przeciwpożarowy?

To nie są chyba prawdziwe nazwy poszczególnych hydrantów?
SpillerC (2020-04-20 14:04:59+00:00): Hi. I just noticed the tags on the northernmost lock gate at 5-rise. Tags
addr:city 	Bingley
addr:street 	Sleningford Road
addr:village 	Crossflatts
building 	residential
source 	survey
waterway 	lock_gate
Apparently last changed by you. Looks like accidentally unwanted tags? I live nearby and only just noticed :(
skyhisi (2020-04-20 14:41:57+00:00): Hi, it looks like you added that tag on version 6 of the node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/280721401/history)
I just removed the ; in the source key that was showing up as a validation warning in my editor.
SpillerC (2020-04-20 15:27:51+00:00): Oops. I struggle to look at history for objects. Yes looks like me! I'll fix it. Sorry to bother you. Colin
sravanthi1 (2019-07-11 04:57:12+00:00): "Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 685789196 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-07-11 06:11:54+00:00): Hello sravanthi1!
It is make senses about your changes.
Thank you & happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-25 11:32:45+00:00): Hi TrippQ3,

It appears you've been testing out the iD editor for OSM. It's awesome you're interested in contributing to the map, but it appears that you have published several changes that you might not have intended to.

Please remember that when you press that "save" button, your edits go live on the public map. I've reverted several of your changes that were clearly incorrect, but you might want to check some of your others just to confirm that they are supposed to be on the map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TrippQ3/history

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask :)
ejont (2019-04-25 11:02:16+00:00): Hello! You deleted part of an administrative boundary here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145750085.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:49:05+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Warin61 (2019-05-01 06:55:29+00:00): Hi, 

Welcome to OSM!

For the Leda Nature Reserve (or anything else) 
Either have a way OR a relation but not both ... 
The guide is 
One feature .. one OSM entry. 

Way: Leda Nature Reserve (499074506)

and 
relation : Leda Nature Reserve (9172337)

should not both be in OSM to represent the same feature. 

As the relation is not closed (dose not enclose an area)  I'll delete it. 

Keep mapping.
nont (2019-05-01 12:39:21+00:00): As you please.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:49:00+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
geoaria (2019-04-25 16:26:13+00:00): مسیر اردستان به مهاباد را به جاده یزد تغییر داده اید که اشتباه است و تصحیح گردید
nisha1995 (2019-04-29 03:21:09+00:00): ممنون از بررسی و اصلاح‌تون
:-)
hatul (2025-01-15 11:16:12+00:00): מה המקור לזה שכביש 805 נקרא „הגליל”?
בהשוואה במפות אחרות לא מצאתי לזה שום מקור. רק כשהוא עובר בדיר חנא וסכנין הוא נקרא אל ג׳ליל.
בשאר המקומות אין לו שם וגם אין סיבה לשם.
Vinber (2019-05-08 10:44:10+00:00): Bonjour, cela pose question, vous créez 2 points, alors que c'est le même garage non ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69551817
qui vend 2 marques ?

Ou c'est 2 garages séparés

à plus
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-05-13 08:43:03+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui c'est un garage PSA qui vend la marque Peugeot et Citroen.
Cordialement,
Vinber (2019-05-14 09:09:17+00:00): Donc c'est bien 1 seul garage avec deux marques différentes à la vente, et non pas 2 garages différents
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-05-15 07:05:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui c'est bien cela, les 2 marques ont 2 entrées différentes avec des infos différentes.
Comment dois je le matérialiser du coup selon vous ?

Merci de votre aide
Vinber (2019-05-15 08:49:32+00:00): en fait j'ai annulé ma première modif mais je ne comprends pas votre réponse :)
Vous dites "oui  c'est bien cela" à "c'est bien 1 seul garage avec deux marques différentes à la vente, et non pas 2 garages différents".

Et ensuite vous parlez de 2 entrées différentes.

Donc sur le garage dans son ensemble, nous avons adresse, horaire shop=car en commun.

puis 2 "guichets, entrées" physiquement différents pour chaque marque ?

Si vous pouviez faire une photo ?

à plus
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:48:49+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Sosha1996 (2019-11-13 08:14:23+00:00): admin_level=6?
are you sure?
whats your source?
Sosha1996 (2019-05-09 10:19:38+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که میزنید متشکرم.
اما باید چندین نکنه رو به شما بگویم، اول این که در بخش توضیحات چنجست، یک متن مناسب باید بنویسید.
جای ایمیلتان در توضیحات چنجست نیست.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

مورد دوم، شما برای هر تغییر باید یک چنجست ایجاد کنید. این حجم از تغییر در یک چنجست به شدت غیر قابل قبول میباشد.

مورد سوم، در685797978 شما یه خط کشیدید وسط بلوار، و بهش تگ دادید.
تگ tertiary اینطوری رسم نمیشه و رسمتون به شدت غلطه.

موفق باشید.
ToniE (2019-04-25 10:37:55+00:00): Hallo brogo,

... kennst Du schon:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de

und

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/DE-Bahnverkehr-Analysis.html

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HH/DE-HH-HVV-Analysis.html

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/EU-Flixbus-Analysis.html

Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen mal den network='NAH.SH' in SH mit in die Analysen aufnehmen. Dann ist Lübeck auch besser mit abgedeckt.

Viele Grüße
Toni
Sanniu (2019-06-10 12:44:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203982336 is one-way noexit now?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:48:42+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:33:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
arcanma (2019-04-28 11:23:27+00:00): Per cortesia dici dove è scritto che è motorway e non trunk? Non trovo nulla. Inoltre hai messo oneway=yes anche sulle rampe che sono a doppio senso, ad esempio la way 47000966, che sto correggendo
*abq* (2019-06-03 14:05:12+00:00): Why did you remove the path tag. Is the path closed?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:48:14+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
jambamkin (2019-04-25 16:31:08+00:00): Is the whole building the Jed Eye Office? If it's not the Jed Eye should probably be added as a node/point.
shaikh solaiman (2019-08-20 10:24:15+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contribution on OSM! in this area you have tagged single nodes as building:levels=1. Is it true or false?
If false, please remove these tag immediately. Keep mapping.
4004 (2019-04-25 19:45:00+00:00): насколько понимаю, у вас автоматы? это немного другой тег, поменял. ну и в название не пишем тип обькта (игровой клуб), только собственно кайман
Caiman Clubs (2019-04-26 08:03:30+00:00): хорошо, спасибо, только тут не все адреса, которые я добавляла, еще по адресам: 
Гомель, Речицкий проспект 86а
Речица, Снежкова 33
Мозырь, Рыжкова 8
4004 (2019-04-27 20:47:03+00:00): а, вижу, их тоже гляну, спасибо
Nakaner (2019-04-26 12:42:19+00:00): Hi,

why did you delete the footpath? You broke two route relations. Could you please fix this before you upload further changesets?

All your changesets you uploaded to OSM since you joined it a few weeks ago seem to be related to Maproulette challenges. I have the impression that you are part of an organised editing actitivity or that you are paid for editing. That's why I ask you to state any affiliation to an organised mapping actitivity on your profile as required by the Organised Editing Guideline and existing best practices.

Best regards

Michael
antonmarkau93 (2019-04-26 13:07:50+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for your notice, I appreciate it. For me this path looked very strange. I couldn't see it on the satellite imagery, and also there is just two roads here that placed very close to each other. I thought this path should not be there.
I fixed it now, sorry if my edit caused any problems.
kartonage (2019-04-25 09:39:05+00:00): Somehow my changeset comment wasn't taken: should have been "Berlin/Johannisthal: additions/improvements to classification change" with source "https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69552372; Geoportal Berlin / Detailnetz Berlin"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
eggie (2020-11-12 09:48:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2019-04-26 09:30:09+00:00): Hi,
you added about 900 objects with the tag "biuiding". Could you fix the spelling of these tags - it should be "building".

Thanks
Jan
4004 (2019-08-05 10:32:25+00:00): здравствуйте,
а что за смак? вроде стоянка там все так же
Anorexius (2019-08-05 10:36:40+00:00): Стоянка нерабочая, привезли плиты и перекрытия, говорят, собираются строить очередной Смак. Но это не точно:)
4004 (2019-08-05 18:28:50+00:00): Просто в заметке человек пишет платная стоянка, и на спутнике стоянка. Закрою заметки, спасибо
geri-oc (2020-07-23 07:51:46+00:00): Guten Tag 
- zum Regenrückhaltebecken siehe WIKI:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dbasin
auch zu name=* gibt es Vorgaben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
Das es ein Regenrückhaltebecken ist ergibt sich aus den Schlüsseln.
Spielplatz als Fläche braucht keinen separaten node.
Die TU sollte mit JOSM arbeiten und eventuell die WIKI-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:TEAM_CN_TUD
korrigieren / ergänzen.
siehe auch: 
https://navigator.tu-dresden.de/mitarbeiter

Bei Fragen gern über PN - Gruß Gerd
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 20:48:05+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
ejont (2019-04-25 10:58:15+00:00): Hello!
Could you please be more careful? This changeset does nothing but delete part of a road.
Greeshmag (2019-04-26 08:30:00+00:00): Connected that road. If it is a bug, can you please raise it?? Because I dont know how it is happening!