piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-09 11:47:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Google ne peut pas être une source de données, il n'est pas autorisé d'utiliser streetview pour contribuer à OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F)
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82998778
Arretche (2021-03-09 18:13:11+00:00): Ah punaise, je comprends le principe. Je le saurais dorénavant. Est-ce qu'on peut (toujours) utiliser Mapillary ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82998778
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-11 05:48:55+00:00): oui mapillary est autorisé
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-11 05:49:32+00:00): d'où encore l'avantage de mapillary même si cela a été racheté par facebook !!!
babaczyk (2025-06-02 18:53:42+00:00): Panie Stefanie - skąd pomysł, że zaznaczone zmiany to grobowce?
Stefan Paluch (2025-06-02 20:07:00+00:00): dziękuję za pytanie - te kółka nie powstały naturalnie, i nie wygląda to na robotę leśników, można je znaleźć w wielu miejscach, niemal zawsze w grupach, wszystkie na ogół identyczne kształtem a dodatkowo niektóre kółka wyglądają na starsze od pozostałych kółek - to wygląda jak cmentarze
babaczyk (2025-06-02 20:15:19+00:00): Postaram się kilka z tych miejsc odwiedzić, ale z racji że chodzę tam niemal codziennie przypuszczam, że jest to praca leśników. Dam znać.
Stefan Paluch (2025-06-02 20:27:10+00:00): dzięki - to by było świetnie :) tu jest widok lidar tych kółek: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=0820CDE5-8B2F-44BD-A4A5-AF8AF8D8AC4B
babaczyk (2025-06-03 06:54:06+00:00): Faktycznie na te kółka w Lidarze nie zwróciłem uwagi. To przesłane skupisko wygląda dość ciekawie tym bardziej, że jest to dość blisko grodziska "Kamieniec". Niemniej przypuszczam, że spora część kopców na tym obszarze to mogą być mielerze, bo na lokalnym targu w Ostromecku kwitł handel dziegciem. Nawet nieistniejąca już wieś która leżała obok nosiła nazwę "Smolniki".
Stefan Paluch (2025-06-03 21:07:55+00:00): to faktycznie będą mielerze
!bm (2020-04-02 22:36:46+00:00): Hey 28MzXP5-_uXH, kannst du mir bitte erklären, was es mit deinem Changeset-Kommentar und dem hinzugefügten "oneway=no" auf sich hat? Übersehe ich etwas? --besteGrüße!bm
28MzXP5-_uXH (2020-04-03 08:18:56+00:00): Hi !bm,
das war die Einstellung im iD die bei One-Way "assumed to be no" anzeigt die ich auch "no" gesetzt hatte. Da der Standard eh "assumed to be no" ist kann das auch weggelassen werden. Ich dachte beim bearbeiten, dass das Sinn macht auf "no" zu setzen ;)

Ich hab noch die alten Tags von der Barrier entfernt und den onway auch wieder entfernt.

LG
BCNorwich (2020-04-03 07:27:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the road has been finished and now open to public use the the construction=residential tag can be removed.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-04-10 19:24:54+00:00): Hi, Thanks for correcting the tags. I hope you can continue to add to OSM. Just for future reference, if you take regard or make corrections to a changeset comment please leave another comment here then I would have been informed. 
Regards Bernard.
althio (2020-04-11 10:16:36+00:00): warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999361
althio (2020-04-11 10:16:54+00:00): warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999645
baptistemm (2020-04-03 06:42:16+00:00): Merci pour cette première contribution, continuez de la sorte.
eggie (2020-04-03 09:01:47+00:00): Tip: barrier=gate houdt niemand tegen.  Beter dus accesstags toevoegen aan de weg en aan het hek.
Gr eggie
Kyan14 (2020-04-03 10:50:38+00:00): Gecorrigeerd.
eggie (2020-04-04 06:00:53+00:00): access=private verwijderd in stuk tot hek.... anders zou het kruispunt niet routeren. Fietsers voetgangers kunnen anders niet oversteken. 
Probeer je steeds te verplaatsen in de verschillende verkeersdeelnemers en kijk wat er dan verandert.
MVG,
Eggie
Kyan14 (2020-04-04 08:01:58+00:00): Top.
map per (2021-03-11 16:04:04+00:00): Hello diegomodolo,

I don't think that it is a good Idea to connect thinks like forrests to roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787281349).
The forrest actually ends at the side of the road and not in the middel of it. 
And If one later wants to change the shape of the forrest its quite difficult to get road and forrest appart form each other, especially at points conected to several roads. And when doing this there is always the risk that one damages the roads, eg. by disconecting them.
On top of that I think its better to leave space for roads as they can be mapped as areas as well (area:highway).
Thats why I don't appreciate forrests connected to roads

Best wishes
map per
Steve_32 (2020-04-04 11:13:40+00:00): bulatoff, приветствую. У вас очень странные тропы. Что это? Они реально существуют?
Alecs01 (2020-04-03 12:07:24+00:00): Ciao, ho fatto il revert di questo changeset perchè sono stati spostati migliaia di nodi: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83000048 non ho mai utilizzato Go Map ma ti consiglierei di usare un altro editor, non è il primo changeset "strano" che vedo
eggie (2020-04-03 09:11:35+00:00): Beste Kenai...
In OSM Nederland hebben we afgesproken om alle info van bedrijven / restaurants e.d. bij te schrijven op de adresnodes.
Svp niet op de gebouwen bijtaggen. Het gebouw heet imers niet Bagels and Beans. kijk je nog even.
MVG,
Eggie
Kyan14 (2020-04-03 10:53:15+00:00): Gecorrigeerd.
chachafish (2020-04-02 21:52:26+00:00): Howdy :) Thanks for your work here. Good job! Just a tip for future reference, if another mapper comes along after you and sees this area as "unmapped" because everything has been removed, they might be tempted to add details. It's best to add a construction zone so other mappers will know everything has been torn down. I've gone ahead and done that. Thanks again :)
gregw66 (2020-04-02 21:55:07+00:00): Ah, good idea - thanks! Will do in the future
highflyer74 (2020-05-06 08:26:25+00:00): Moin!

Wenn etwas nicht mehr vorhanden ist, sei es ein Gebäude oder ein POI (z.B. Geschäft), dann empfiehlt es sich, dies nicht gleich zu löschen, sondern es per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix zu kennzeichnen. Dadurch erhält man die Historie eines OSM-Objekts (die beim Löschen verloren geht) und man verhindert (z.B. bei einem Gebäude) dass dieses vom nächsten Mapper wieder eingezeichnet wird, weil er es noch auf irgendeinem Luftbild sieht.

Danke!
literan (2020-08-09 11:12:01+00:00): никаких из этих камер на местности нет (от Иванова до Приволжска всего одна реальная камера, рядом с Фурмановым - я проезжал там на днях и все преджупреждения, что издавал Османд, оказались ложными. Макам.инфо подтверждает). Вы внесли или фейковую информцию, или места расположения передвижных камер. 

Вычищу, пожалуйста, не делайте так больше.
Vinber (2020-04-04 07:51:52+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-04 07:52:48+00:00): Il manque les tags (attributs) pour définir le centre équestre : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
mapman44 (2020-04-04 05:51:33+00:00): Please use changeset comments that give a better description of what you did and why. Good changeset comments are part of good practices for OSM editors. Please review this Wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83002521
philippec (2020-04-11 14:55:20+00:00): Voor mij hoeft het niet als het ook niet op Mapillary mag.
M!dgard (2020-06-20 23:23:09+00:00): Krijg je geld van hen om hun platform zo hard te pushen misschien? Een foto is een foto.
Dilys (2020-04-03 11:43:11+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces premières contributions.
Cependant, regardez un peu ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89quitation.
Il s'agit ici d'une une carrière (leisure=pitch). Je suggère un nouveau nœud pour l'ensemble du centre équestre (leisure=horse_riding).

Cordialement
Victorcln456 (2020-04-15 10:30:11+00:00): Bonjour, 
Oui effectivement c'est une carrière, je me suis servi de celle-ci pour préciser le lieu de l'écurie, je ne saurais délimiter toute l'écurie en elle même ne connaissant pas les "frontières"... 

Merci
Dilys (2020-04-16 11:48:27+00:00): Si vous connaissez les limites, vous pouvez dessiner la zone complète du centre équestre comme une surface, sinon comme un nœud. J'ai fait la correction ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83646557.
Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à poser des questions.

Dilys
Warin61 (2020-04-04 00:15:21+00:00): Changeset 82906925 reverted your changeset 82847724 that broke several Administration Boundaries. The changes made are verifiable for the stated changeset sources of:
OSM for the past Administration Boundaries and the changes made by that changeset.

LPI Base Map for the Administration Boundaries. 

Maxar for road alignments. 

----------------------
The changeset is verifiable.  Stating that the changeset is unverifiable and inaccurate ???
Warin61 (2020-04-04 00:37:59+00:00): Some suggestions from this changeset:

tunnel without layer=-1 causing crossing of road with buildings and roads
Way: M4-M5 Link Tunnel (787303509)
Way: M4-M5 Link Onramp (786073176)
Way: M4-M5 Link Tunnel (715715942)
Way: M4-M5 Link Offramp (786073177)

Overlapping roads:
Way: Church Street (173778130)
Way: St Peters Street (173778124)

Missing node where St Peters St crosses cycleway. 

Missing tunnel where the incorrectly named Campbell Road (should be Street!) crosses Princess Hwy
mapman44 (2020-04-03 02:55:14+00:00): Hello, steso007, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits but please note that it's always preferable to modify exisiting objects so the editing history is preserved rather than deleting them and then re-drawing essentially the same thing. Also keep in mind that in your changesets you are deleting good work done by another editor less than a year ago.
baptistemm (2020-04-03 06:43:40+00:00): Thanks for this first contribution.

I know nothing about gold so I trust you the change is correct.

Continue to contribute to Openstreetmap
mapman44 (2020-04-03 03:37:46+00:00): Please use the changeset comments to leave meaningful descriptions of your edits. This is just a basic good practice for OSM editors. Please review this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mapman44 (2020-04-03 00:53:34+00:00): Hello, tguen, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits. Your buildings look great! Keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83003102
Trevor_1 (2020-04-05 16:12:13+00:00): Hi. Please stop changing every residential road to unmaintained track. This could be considered vandalism and you could get suspended. 

Hola. Por favor, deja de reclasificar cada "residential road" a "unmaintained track". Esto se podria clasificar como vandalismo y te podrian suspender tu cuenta
chachafish (2020-04-10 16:01:12+00:00): Howdy, thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. It looks like you've added quite a few houses with "names" that are numbers. I'd suspect these are actually the address numbers of the buildings. The numbers should be part of the street address. Minimum requirements for addresses are 1) street number and 2) street name. Could you go back and correct this? Thanks :)
andrewwiseman (2020-04-08 21:19:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States
nbotsford3 (2020-04-03 21:48:57+00:00): Sequencer, glad to see you helping out. I originally added Yucca Pens to the map. I see you added a number of new "Roads". Were you doing this from just the imagery, or do you have experience with the area. I mapped all the roads that were open to vehicular traffic. It looks like the ones you mapped were at best ranger access roads off-limits to the public and some look like they might be fire breaks.
My point is that it makes it more difficult for people who are trying to legally navigate the area to find their way. Maybe they should have been tagged as paths rather than roads to make their intended purpose clearer.
Sequencer (2020-04-03 21:54:01+00:00): Hi!
I haven't been there. I just use imagery.
Yes, that's a problem if not all roads are open for public use, but the only right solution in such case is a proper access=* tags on all of them. They does not look like just "path". How can we do a proper tagging?
nbotsford3 (2020-04-03 23:41:49+00:00): Well I am not sure what the correct tag would be for routes used by rangers that are closed to the public other than setting the vehicle allowed access to private or permit. I THINK it would be permissible to use highway=path and motor_vehicle=permit. That would better convey the intended use which is for hunters to walk on and rangers to patrol on quads or pickups. That would render better also.
Do be careful, it is very hard to tell roads (or areas where vehicles have churned up the ground) from fire breaks. In areas like this they run a tractor with a plow to create a 10' wide break in the vegetation to split the region up into squares in case a fire breaks out. They are not usually passable by vehicles as they are very loose sand. They usually look a brighter white than roads.
The legal roads are on this map: https://myfwc.com/media/5662/yuccapensunit.pdf
SomeoneElse (2020-04-04 12:54:13+00:00): Actually, if a "path" is wide enough for a 4-wheeled vehicle I'd have thought that "highway=track" (with appropriate access tags) would be a better bet.  Never been this far south in Florida though...
Sequencer (2020-04-04 22:58:05+00:00): I agree with SomeoneElse. If in reality those roads are used by motor vehicles (illegally or not) we have to tag them as highway=track with an appropriate access tags. As I see from satellite imagery those roads are heavily used by offroaders. If there are some cutlines to prevent fires there is also a correct tag for them.

BTW, I plan to visit that area after quarantine to see how it looks like
nbotsford3 (2020-04-05 02:23:48+00:00): OK, I will close with this:
My only objection to tagging routes passable by vehicles as highway=track that are not on the park map and thus not legal to drive on, is that they will not provide an easy way for users of the standard rendered map to find the legal roads. I think many of the spider webs of trails are from before the land was taken over by the state.

Second, and more importantly, many if not most of the tracks mapped, especially in the northern section are actually fire breaks that are not passable except maybe by specialized vehicles. Anything that is a bright even white is pretty much a fire break. Even the well traveled legal tracks show two distinct ruts and shoulders to drain the water. This is more noticeable in the ESRI imagery right now as it is higher res and from the dry season.
andrewwiseman (2020-04-08 21:19:34+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States
gollabg (2020-04-03 04:43:25+00:00): Apologies for using interal jargons on OSM, the correct comment for this changeset is  Added  multiple service roads #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-03 05:45:01+00:00): Hi alan_greenspun, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting more or less the entire golf course? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=83005822

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
DressyPear4 (2020-04-10 17:22:12+00:00): Olá, adicione apenas o que existe, não adicione nada aleatório.
Essa edição foi revertida.
mweper (2020-04-11 22:49:30+00:00): Hola scampana. Me he fijado que has eliminado la etiqueta amenity de esta área. ¿Cuál fue el motivo por el que has decidido borrar esto? ¿Este lugar ya no es más una escuelo o colegio, es solamente una edición errónea?.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-04-03 03:30:43+00:00): Sorry for this (have lost track of my editing activity), but I forgot to save the edits for Talugtug before doing those for Taal.
mweper (2020-04-11 22:56:10+00:00): Hola scampana. He tenido que eliminar la etiqueta name=casa1 porque según las normas de OSM, no se permiten datos privados o subjetivos en el mapa. Saludos.
mapman44 (2020-04-03 04:23:00+00:00): Please use the changeset comments to leave meaningful descriptions of your edits. This is just a basic good practice for OSM editors. Please review this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2020-04-05 10:34:39+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please square the relevant buildings with the Q key in ID editor
10 out of 11 buildings you mapped here are not squared. (some of them are indeed not square)
Best regards and keep mapping
abakus_uploader (2020-04-03 22:32:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2020-04-04 12:14:04+00:00): неверный тег. Надо просто maxspeed=RU:urban. Исправлю
andrewwiseman (2020-04-08 21:19:38+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States
Warin61 (2020-04-12 05:20:17+00:00): Hi,
Do you agree that the Administration boundaries of Bayside Council, Mascot,
Alexandria, Council of the City of Sydney and St Peters (and possibly others can be removed from nearby roadways? 
My desire is to dissociate roads that people modify fairly frequently from Admin. Boundaries that most really don't want to change.
Fijord (2020-04-03 06:21:00+00:00): Eine Frechheit!
althio (2020-04-11 10:17:14+00:00): warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83014348
julcnx (2021-09-05 14:58:27+00:00): Hello Dave, I hope you are well.

FYI, I have removed junction=yes on nodes that do not share other properties as described in the documentation 
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dyes

Best, Julien
AlaskaDave (2021-09-06 14:32:49+00:00): Hello Julien,

I don't have a problem with that. 

Dave
baptistemm (2020-04-03 13:24:06+00:00): Il y a une couche cadastre dans l'editeur qui donne les emprises des bâtiments (cela se choisit dans la partie a droite de l'écran).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83015929
AlexRiabtsev (2020-04-03 08:43:06+00:00): Hello, Niels!
Thanks for editing OSM but I'd like to ask you not to make bboxes all around the world ;)
Thanks in advance,
Alex
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2020-04-03 08:52:32+00:00): Oh, sorry.
I forgot I had some DK changes in there.
AlexRiabtsev (2020-04-03 08:55:36+00:00): No problem! Stay safe :)
best wishes from Ukraine!
Alex
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 19:15:55+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
abakus_uploader (2020-04-03 22:32:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
4004 (2020-04-03 22:04:46+00:00): access fixed
laurent-38 (2020-04-11 07:21:17+00:00): Bonjour _OraKyo_,
Bienvenue sur Openstreetmap, et merci pour votre contribution.

Voici quelques remarques concernant la maison https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142617649 :
Il existe un ensemble de valeurs communément acceptées pour le type de bâtiment, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:building .
La valeur "maison" (building=maison) n’en fait pas partie, il y a pour cela la valeur building=detached , qui signifie « Maison individuelle ».

Pour les adresses, inutile de préciser code postal et ville, ces valeurs se déduisent de la position géographique.

En revanche, pour des bâtiments éloignés de la route comme celui-ci, il est intéressant de cartographier l’allée qui permet d’y accéder, en précisant que l’accès est privé.

Avez-vous la possibilité de faire ces modifications ?

Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
baptistemm (2020-04-03 08:58:29+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour cette contribution, qui sera la premiere d'une longue serie. 
Je vais transformer le texte en information exploitable. Pour les prochaines fois, utilisez les champs dédiés pour les informations (telephone, horaires d'ouvertures, ...)

En tant que mairie vous êtes un acteur privilégié pour ajouter également les commerces et autres lieux aux alentours.

Un doute ? une question, contactez moi.

Bonnes contributions
baptistemm (2020-04-03 09:11:13+00:00): en fait l’hôtel de ville existe déjà sur la carte, a côté de la médiatheque.
J'ai tenté d'ajouter les informations mais une partie de votre texte était tronqué car le texte du champs description doit rester court.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83017947
frosm (2020-11-14 08:34:50+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/93839387
il y a un point de vue à cet endroit sans le moindre parking ?
vous citez le cadastre comme source mais il n'en indique pas