piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:26:57+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade12
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210116671/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade1
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
cOSMografix (2024-05-23 08:58:32+00:00): Hello
Of course it's a typo.
Sorry ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-23 17:32:34+00:00): Can you fix it?

Or confirm that tracktype=grade1 was intended here?
Privatemajory (2022-09-10 17:43:41+00:00): Bonjour. Ce groupe de modifications a cassé le réseau routier principal en changeant une portion de route tertiaire en route mineure (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224917765)
literan (2022-08-31 17:24:28+00:00): Тоже вандальная правка, удаляются ссылки на действующие соцсети
kate_rocketdata (2022-08-31 17:31:47+00:00): Добрый вечер, literan!
К сожалению, наши клиенты просят удалять ссылки на соцсети, которые признаны экстремистскими на территории РФ. 
Спасибо за понимание.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-20 09:09:12+00:00): Hi nitinatsangsit, 

thank you for contributing in osm. i trust you well in mapping as local mapper and i do believe you have more local knowledge in this area
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1090716585 I've been come across armchair mapping in this area. I found overlapping way in the primary road (Thinanon Road). would you mind to come recheck in this area? I appreciate if you could fix this issue.
please let me know if you any suggestion.

cheers
Nithinat S (2022-12-20 13:31:45+00:00): Fixed it.

Thanks for pointing this out.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-21 01:18:22+00:00): awesome. thanks for improvement. happy mapping
syntex (2022-09-20 18:59:41+00:00): Why did you change the name of the village??
bxl-forever (2022-08-31 13:31:18+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this; I remember we didn’t map it because it was only a—presumably short-lived—test, but it’s been several months now, so it’s likely it will stay and it’s nice to have the new situation on the map.

One concern about this connector:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090723431

Is oneway:bicycle=yes inherited from the previous situation, or is it intentional to have it here?

On Mapillary, it looks like cyclists *and* motor vehicles may legally enter here from the south.  Motor vehicles will turn onto Rue du Chapitre/Kapittelstraat.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=689221835501079

That will be oneway=no instead.
I guess you were there recently.  Does this match the current situation?
RaphaelPasloin (2022-08-31 14:04:37+00:00): Hello,
No it's herited to the previous oneway situation. Will change this mistake now. Delivery can exit to Rue Saint Guidon. The Question is where they can came from. (Coming from Rue Wayez is actualy impossible due to the work) Presume from the parking. I have made some mapilary picture form the situation yesterday, just uploaded now, will review it when injection is completed.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-31 22:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
flohoff (2022-09-19 12:45:12+00:00): Moin,
it would be good if you would leave a "note" with exact wording of the signs prohibiting the use of roads.

access=private is pretty hard. Typically its "through" traffic which is prohibited. With access=private there is no way to reach these houses. Not for a taxi, delivery services, postal etc.

Flo
Access Claims (komoot) (2022-09-26 11:22:34+00:00): Hi Flo,
Thanks for your feedback! We will take it into account for future edits. In this case, the sign says "Privatweg, Benutzung verboten" + the official "250: Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art" sign
docjay (2023-06-01 20:55:47+00:00): I can’t seem to find a restroom at this location; it appears to be a patch of grass. Was it perhaps located in the small building nearby: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973022152 ? This building is locked off now so it’s hard to tell.

If no objections, I’ll delete the restroom node. Thanks!
starsep (2023-06-01 21:00:29+00:00): Unfortunately I don't recall where exactly toilet was located. If it's gone, sure, delete it.
Cartyl (2023-09-30 12:05:12+00:00): Salut,
Je me pose une question sur ta modélisation des 4 arceaux à vélo.
Est ce que ce ne serait pas plus pertinent de ne mettre qu'un noeud avec amenity=bicycle_parking et capacity=8?
En l'état, le parking ne ressort pas sur les rendus.
Bonne journée!
Mattam (2023-09-30 12:19:29+00:00): Salut,
Je me suis posé la question pour tous les arceaux, et j'ai préféré noter chacun d'eux plutôt que l'ensemble afin d'être plus fidèle à la réalité. À mon sens, les deux solutions se valent. En revanche, j'ai oublié le tag amenity=bicycle_parking, d'où l'absence sur les rendus. J'ajoute cela tout de suite. Bien vu !
Bonne journée.
Cartyl (2023-09-30 12:23:04+00:00): oui je comprend.
Je me suis basé sur le wiki avant de faire le commentaire.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=bicycle_parking
mais c'est vrai que les deux interprétations sont possibles.
Mattam (2023-09-30 13:20:35+00:00): Ah oui, je n'avais pas vu les bonnes pratiques. Je vais modifier ma manière de taguer.
DD1GJ (2022-09-01 09:54:01+00:00): Werbeprosa entfernt, Steuerberater korrekt gekennzeichnet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dtax_advisor
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-31 14:27:12+00:00): Skąd wiesz że są tu dwa budynki nazwane "RATCHEM Paweł Kukawka"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 23:59:26+00:00): Wysłałem PW
Warin61 (2023-06-29 03:16:13+00:00): Hi
The 'landuse=grass' is actually an AFL pitch. Corrected.
slice0 (2023-06-29 03:21:19+00:00): yes correct the oval is grass, its not just used as a AFL ground though, its a general use ground for afl/cricket/soccer anything else
Warin61 (2023-06-29 08:03:17+00:00): I have added the cricket. However the other sports are not obvious to me .. 

See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090733814
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185627654

I prefer individual mapping as that shows the individual sports are present. 

Added netball - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185627656
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-16 13:57:24+00:00): 54011 non 54016, correggo io
divulmappeur (2022-08-31 12:01:24+00:00): https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:B%C3%A9ziers,_All%C3%A9e_Colonel_de_Gendarmerie_Arnaud_Beltrame.jpg
jeslop (2022-08-31 14:26:00+00:00): Hello Safia98. 

I have reverted your changes because they are clearly wrong. Pay a little more attention to your edits. 

You can read more about OSM in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Regards

--

Salut Safia98. J'ai annulé vos modifications car elles sont clairement erronées. Faites un peu plus attention à vos révisions.

Vous pouvez en savoir plus sur OSM dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Guide_du_d%C3%A9butant

Salutations

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
gogorm (2022-09-01 20:45:34+00:00): Hi, I'm not certain, but it looks like the connection that exists between the shared cycle and foot path at Tallaght Bypass (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404665415) and Glenview Park, was removed by this changeset.
As a result there is no way for a cyclist to continue from that shared cycle and foot surface at Tallaght Bypass into Glenview Park, and vice versa.
If this was you and you feel there is a better way of representing such a connection, I'm happy to discuss. Otherwise, I will restore the link.
joeyctatu (2022-09-01 21:44:16+00:00): I have fixed it to how the blue circular signs of cycle tracks and cycle/foot shared path are stated. It doesn't make sense, but blame SDCC. You can have a look at Google Maps Street view. It's the same since May. https://www.google.com/maps/@53.2880869,-6.3409046,3a,45.1y,299.29h,85.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3dOfOC1Lh4GLPFPZN5YYzw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
gogorm (2022-09-03 18:06:49+00:00): Ok. I have added an unmarked crossing so pedestrians can get from the footpath at the point just after the cycle and footpath ends, to the road.
DD1GJ (2022-08-31 12:49:33+00:00): Beachten Sie bitte, dass die üblichen SEO-Methoden incl. Werbeprosa im Projekt unerwünscht sind und gegebenfalls entfernt werden. Ebenso ist darauf zu achten, dass die Positionsbestimmung nicht anhand anderer unzulässiger Quellen wie z.B. Google Maps erfolgt.

Neutrale Firmeneinträge (incl. Telefon und Webseite) mit korrekter Arrtibutierung sind als eigene Knoten ok.
pitfire (2022-08-31 13:02:35+00:00): Dann fehlt jetzt noch, den Weg: 27771305 unter dem Gebäude im überdeckten Abschnitt zu schneiden und ein "covered"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
Gruß pitfire
Firefishy (2022-09-04 00:32:45+00:00): I have reverted this change. I am unsure what you were trying to add. I am happy to help. OpenStreetMap data is widely used (navigation, phones, cars, online) it is very important that the data is correct
eggie (2022-08-31 15:15:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2022-09-01 05:36:53+00:00): Hi LikiCarolina,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=6.64316&lat=7.12560&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125610333

This errors was created by moving several ways around. I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Kind regards
Guido
Intrinsical (2022-08-31 16:26:31+00:00): As said before ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124933772 ), it is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this information came from.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Thank you.
Martin Borsje (2023-01-25 21:27:25+00:00): Wat is de bron dat dit fietspad Veeweg heet? De BGT vermeldt dit niet.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-01-26 09:50:39+00:00): Hi! It was a request from our customer. There was no reason not to trust him, since the information was always reliable. But if suddenly there is a mistake, let me know, please, I will correct the name of the road.
Martin Borsje (2023-01-26 10:38:08+00:00): Can you reveal that 'customer' then and the relation to you or your organization?
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-01-26 11:06:33+00:00): This request was submitted by one of mapbox contribute customer. This is a platform where you are able to send a feedback to improve the map.
Martin Borsje (2023-01-26 11:41:43+00:00): Ok.  Know enough; most likely false.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-01-26 17:02:24+00:00): I removed the name of the road. Thank you for your comment!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-09 19:41:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125994264 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Intrinsical (2022-08-31 16:23:43+00:00): As said before ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124933772 ), it is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this information came from.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Thank you.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-09 19:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125994264 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
eggie (2022-08-31 15:22:34+00:00): Dag Edd..
In het begin wordt ook wel meegekeken.. Uiteraard om te helpen.
name=  uitsluitend gebruiken en dus niet name=Tijdelijke Bouwweg
Gebruik dan niets of note=... (mededeling voor andere mappers)

access=no in combinatie met andere tagging is bijna altijd fout.
Het is een algemene Verboden Toegang tagging en gebruiken we niet op openbare wegen en paden. 
Dus access=no beter verwijderen. 

   oneway=no niet op reguliere wegen taggen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-31 15:42:17+00:00): Dag Edd.. De tagging heb ik aangepast en access=no verwijderd.
Dat is onwaarschijnlijk hier. 
Wellicht is het ook een BUG in je editor. Die vraagt of je van alles moet invullen, maar dat is echt niet nodig. Bv zou hier echt een ruiterverbod zijn? horse=no
MVG
eggie
Msiipola (2022-09-24 10:51:23+00:00): Hej! Det verkar som du har lagt till/justerat byggnader här. Men som du ser är väldigt många av dessa fel. Ej rektangulära, sneda och fel storlek. Se exempelvis 24-26 Mosstigen, men även många andra. Byggnader som läggs till behöver har ha högre kvalité än så här. Beror detta på dålig bakgrundsbild?
Oavsett det, behöver alla dessa byggnader rättas till omgående.
multimodaal (2022-09-01 12:54:24+00:00): Hoi, mooi dat je de openstelling van de Rijnlandroute bijhoudt!

Je hebt dit fietspad verwijdert uit OSM: 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/33474237

Ben vandaag door de nieuwe tunnel gefietst, en van dit pad zijn nog wel delen en sporen te zien in het veld. 
Dan kan je in de toekomst het pad beter niet helemaal verwijderen, maar een geschikte lifecycle_prefix geven zoals [ abandoned: ] , dat voorkomt dat het voor andere mappers spoorzoeken wordt als ze dit in het veld zien en zich afvragen wat dit is.  Heb 'm hersteld

Thx!
Aggregaat02 (2022-09-01 16:23:26+00:00): Dankjewel!
multimodaal (2022-09-01 16:27:01+00:00): Cheers (-: 
Oja: Fietspad Torenvlietbrug loopt nu over de nieuwe zuidelijke brug, het beweegbare deel van de oude brug is verwijderd en wordt elders gerestaureerd. Begreep van bouwvakker dat deze terugkomt als vaste brug en fietspad dan daar ook weer overheen gaat.  Heb de aansluiting aan Valkenburgsche kant niet kunnen bekijken. 
Als jij tijd en zin hebt (-; ..
Aggregaat02 (2022-09-06 18:27:40+00:00): Een deze dagen zal ik even langsgaan, als ik het niet vergeet :)
Dan200 (2024-11-03 00:06:32+00:00): What is your source for Redmere Drove being passable on foot or bycycle? It's not on any Public Right of Way maps, and the property seems to have "PRIVATE PROPERTY KEEP OUT" signs posted.
eggie (2022-08-31 15:25:05+00:00): Beste Jurgie.. Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Je krijgt dan schade. Je hebt Hooigracht 31 heel ergens anders neer gezet.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125612191

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-31 15:25:51+00:00): Zet svp nieuwe winkels op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus geen adressen aanmaken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-31 15:30:05+00:00): Adresnode 31K hersteld
eggie (2022-08-31 15:31:51+00:00): Verboon Service samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode
MisterMaps (2022-08-31 17:31:11+00:00): I was wrong between Maine and Vermont in the name of edit, it is Vermont and not Maine.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-31 22:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
martien-176 (2022-08-31 13:52:32+00:00): Hi Angelica, i notice you are using imagery Bing here. Please use Maxar instead, as per the project instructions. Just hit the B keyboard key to switch imagery.

Also, please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard.

Thanks and kind regards,

Martien, Global HOT Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125612642
L'imaginaire (2022-09-01 15:17:50+00:00): OSM is not a place to announce events. There are better places with more visibility to do that.
mascalzone67 (2022-09-01 16:28:59+00:00): Dear Imaginaire, you are right, but being inexperienced, I just wanted to signal the reopening of the museum after eleven years. Not wanting to touch anything, I thought I'd put it in the description tag, but obviously it isn't ... Best regards.
L'imaginaire (2022-09-01 16:44:16+00:00): Thanks for claryfying that! Best to put information like that in a note tag. I've done this for you.

Happy mapping!
mascalzone67 (2022-09-01 16:59:51+00:00): Dear Imaginaire, thank you for teaching me a way to report something new that I did not know about. I learned about the reopening of the museum from a specialized Italian art site. Best regards.
MacLondon (2022-09-02 15:25:20+00:00): Hi, Are you sure that cycling is no longer permitted on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393242439?
ivanbranco (2022-08-31 20:33:13+00:00): Ciao,

così come per questo changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125410599

ho ripristinato il parcheggio. Cancellare parcheggi mappati come aree e sostituirli con nodi è una perdita di dettaglio.
Geogast (2023-09-04 14:24:48+00:00): Do you really think "Igreja da Paz e Grupo Escoteiro e Núcleo Bandeirante Bororos" is a correct name for an amenity=place_of_worship item!? It doesn't seem "manually checked" for me (as you write in the comment). Please revert your edit to the status quo ante.
Aleksandar1994 (2023-09-04 15:17:33+00:00): Hi Geogast!
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Your feedback is greatly appreciated, and I value your commitment to maintaining accurate data.
Best regards,
Aleksandar
somix (2022-08-31 14:08:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Driver#How_to_map
ElliottPlack (2022-09-01 00:59:20+00:00): Aloha! Nice work mapping all these buildings. However, there is a small problem with this edit. All of the nodes on the buildings are also tagged as buildings. I assume this was a mistake. You can fix it easily in JOSM by searching for buildings and then tapping 'E'. That selects all the nodes. Remove the building tags on the nodes. Let me know if you need assistance.

Thanks,

Elliott Plack  
Data Working Group
Jhoinana (2022-09-01 01:31:21+00:00): Hi Elliot, thanks for the feedback. Been trying to figure this out all day myself. With your help I was able to remove the tags on nodes as building. However, how do I get to tag all of these mappings as buildings without doing this for individual building as these were digitized with nodes and not woth the buildings plugin. 
Would appreciate your help. Thanks. 
Joy.
ElliottPlack (2022-09-01 02:10:50+00:00): Hi Joy, if I understand correctly, you're tracing all the buildings as boxes with no tags and then wanting to tag them all as buildings at the end? If that's the case, you can draw all the boxes then in JOSM:

1. Find (Ctrl F)
2. type 'new untagged type:way closed' (without quotes). This will find all the new closed ways that are not tagged
3. add building tags

For tagging building boxes you've already uploaded but are not tagged yet, you could modify the search to 'untagged type:way closed' to find any closed way (e.g. a square building), and then update those.

Cheers,  
Elliott
user_5359 (2022-09-03 06:54:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag whitehouse Farm Medical Centre = GP Practice? If this this is healthcare object please search on https://wiki.osm.org for healthcare.
user_15862816 (2022-08-31 19:55:48+00:00): Эх, скоро столько надо будет на украинский переводить, вы уже начинайте по чуть-чуть
%20Bunny (2022-09-19 11:00:04+00:00): Thanks for doing this update.
muchichka_s (2022-08-31 15:02:44+00:00): А хіба вже була сесія міської ради? Просто рішення комісії недостатньо для перейменування, треба сесію
Niiepce (2024-06-01 11:57:09+00:00): Ich habe diesen Changeset zurückgesetzt. In OpenStreetMap kartieren wir die Realität und nicht das was wünschenswert ist. Falls ihr noch Fragen habt, könnt ihr sie gerne hier drunter schreiben.
Viele Grüße
Fra00 (2022-08-31 14:37:01+00:00): (continuo) superficie
afnxn (2022-08-31 14:45:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125543763 Changeset reverted
Mannivu (2022-09-04 08:49:01+00:00): Ciao :) il tag noexit andrebbe compilato solo con yes o no. Motor_vehicle non è una complicazione standard. Risulta, inoltre, inutile, perché i router si accorgono comunque che la strada dopo quel modo non è più viabile per i mezzi a motore. Inoltre, noexit va usato nei casi in cui non sia possibile continuare in alcun modo, per esempio per la presenza di una barriera (siepe, muro, massicciata, ecc).
SimonTheGolds (2022-09-04 13:07:18+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per la dritta. Mi scuso per gli errori, sto ancora imparando.
Mannivu (2022-09-04 13:29:43+00:00): Nessun problema :)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 23:23:08+00:00): Dejaste estos dos caminos desconectados https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1412085623
Mashin (2022-08-31 19:13:56+00:00): Hi,
just a heads up, the trail name is already included in the hiking relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11038937
madiener (2022-08-31 20:03:49+00:00): I'm not advanced at this, so I'm not sure what the hiking relation means. None of the segments seemed to have names, and they did not render in Gaia. In some cases, the segments would have part of the trail and sections that were not part of the trail.
Mashin (2022-08-31 21:12:01+00:00): Relations are another type of object that groups together related lines and points. In this case it groups together all  lines that make up Nipmuck Trail. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking)

Gaia doesn't like to show marked trail, but there are other maps that do. 
e.g, Mapy (https://en.mapy.cz/turisticka?x=-72.1984958&y=41.8753241&z=15)
Waymarked Trails (https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11038937)
Mashin (2022-08-31 21:29:36+00:00): Also there is this Map type in Gaia that they outsourced and shows the trails. You can add it to your account with the green button in the corner

https://www.gaiagps.com/maps/source/openhikingmapHD/
madiener (2022-08-31 22:29:28+00:00): This is great.  Thanks! In the past, for a trail like South Taconic, I would create a route in a different color.
ivanbranco (2022-08-31 21:05:25+00:00): Ciao Pasquale,

come mai hai cancellato questo place?
E' presente nelle IGM, e viene inoltre citato sul sito del comune di Matera in svariati documenti come "Contrada Grotta Pignata" o "Località Grotta Pignata", ad esempio qua: https://www.comune.mt.it/images/Piano_strutturale_comunale/CRS2/Valore_storico_culturale/CRS2_REPERTORIO_VALORE_STORICO-CULTURALI_ALL.pdf
o ancora
https://www.comune.mt.it/images/amm_trasp/pianificazione_e_governo_del_territorio/RU_Adozione_CC_del_13_4_2018/Studio_Geologico_RU_Matera_27_11_2014/GEO_0_Relazione_RU_13_marzo_2015.pdf

qui in particolare recita: "che solcano il versante in contrada Grotta Pignata e nella zona di Mass. del Duchino"

Masseria che appunto è mappata poco ad ovest rispetto al place che hai cancellato.
map per (2022-11-08 15:28:36+00:00): Hallo AP_MUC,

wenn getrennte Rad- und Fußwege nicht baulich getrennt sind sollte das in OSM mit nur einem Way (und nicht zwei) eingezeichnet werden. Den doppelten Fußweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090784242) also bitte wieder gelöscht.

(und bitte mir bescheid sagen (z.B. mit einem Changeset Commetn), damit ich weiß, dass der Fehler behoben wurde)

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-11-13 17:22:13+00:00): Habs korrigiert
SzymonH (2022-09-02 13:00:16+00:00): Relacje autobusowe pozmieniam, kiedy faktycznie wrócą na trasy (chyba od jutra).