piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
filbro (2021-05-14 06:00:15+00:00): Hi Sebastian,
top! Und ja stimmt, im ID Editor sieht man keine kleinen Pfeile; ich merke mir hier immer „Rechts geht’s runter“, bezogen auf die Pfadrichtung (wie eben auch bei cliff oder z.B. weir). 
Wie gesagt, die OSMAnd App ist der einzige mir bekannte Renderer welcher dieses tag aktuell zeigt, ich hoffe andere ziehen bald nach.
Grüße,
Filip
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-14 13:26:46+00:00): Do you really think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31440833/history has been farmland??
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-14 13:27:06+00:00): iD is giving a false warning here.
eggie (2021-04-11 20:28:20+00:00): In het begin wordt meegekeken. Uiteraard om te helpen. 
De leisure=park heb ik verwijderd

Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.  

Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. 

Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665 

 Kleine stukjes gemeente groen zijn geen parken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-11 20:35:58+00:00): Hi Daniel.. Look in the wiki for leisure=park.. This is not a park.
I removed your contribution.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Examples for a park is the Vondelpark. Not urban green.
Greetz
eggie
Jaime-malo (2021-06-09 15:05:59+00:00): no hay edificio en esa ubicación cómo crear en esa ubicación
según maxa y bing no hay edificios ara allí
Jaime-malo (2021-06-09 15:09:09+00:00): no hay edificio en esa ubicación cómo crear en esa ubicación según maxa y bing no hay edificios ara allí
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 05:00:41+00:00): Hii MappingJen,
I have Fixed the alignment, as building polygon
overlapping with unclassified road @node 8618810766,Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102769468.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102755238
BCNorwich (2021-04-12 06:51:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, just a few points to help your mapping.

I've removed the name= tags as this inadvertently contains the house numbers, not the house name. The numbers you already have in the addr:housenumber= tag.

The house numbered 15 extended across several houses. I've reduced its outline, removed the number (I can't determine the numbers. 

In the iD editor if you use the Maxar imagery you'll find a later/better image of this area, (right side of editor, click 'background settings', select/click 'Maxar Premium Imagery'. You should see several buildings where you had drawn one.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Linkid (2021-04-12 07:11:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution.
Est-ce un import cadastre ?
vasony (2021-04-19 20:10:37+00:00): Szia!

Ha "elbontva", akkor célszerű meghagyni az épületet és átírni demolished:building-re a címkét amíg nem épül valami a helyére, akkor más nem rajzolja vissza műholdképről.
A házszám viszont a teleké, nyugodtam megmaradhat.
Átalakítottam így.

Tamás
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-19 17:18:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929366991/history - what is the meaning of ref:BRN that was used here?
JesseFTW (2023-05-29 02:26:38+00:00): Note also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102756146 by the same user, which added two other buildings with this same mysterious ref:BRN=29B10112 . I think this was just a mistake, given that the rest of the uses of this key are as part of a " Zanzibar Buildings Import".
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-29 15:45:47+00:00): removed all three
Syl (2021-04-16 20:54:56+00:00): Bonjour, pour info des images aériennes plus récentes sont disponibles : https://wms.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/rennes_2020/{zoom}/{x}/{y} (à ajouter comme fond personnalisé dans iD).
pme35 (2021-04-18 19:10:39+00:00): impeccable merci !
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-11 20:29:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102090231, 102090485, 102090585, 102090617, 102092199, 102093611, 102094519.
sorcrosc (2021-04-11 20:55:50+00:00): Questa relazione ha raggiunto proporzioni assurde e sono finiti nell'area forestale paesi interi...
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 18:18:13+00:00): Non sapevo dei limiti delle relazioni. Le località a cui ti riferisci sono aree ancora da rendere "inner" così come ho fatto con tante altre località. Un po' alla volta e le farò. Se magari vuoi darmi una mano...
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 18:24:37+00:00): Ad ogni modo, giusto per sapere, una relazione molto grande quale problema dà, oltre a quello di impiegare qualche secondo a caricare (la relazione direttamente)
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 18:28:04+00:00): Infine, ho fatto un controllo ma non trovo i paesi da te citati. Solo borghi e abitazioni isolate (e qua mi rifaccio a qunto detto prima). Puoi evidenziare i paesi in questione che li correggo con priorità assoluta?
sorcrosc (2021-04-12 19:07:11+00:00): Non è un problema di limite tecnico, ci sono relazioni anche con più elementi ma quando mai finirai di sistemare tutte le aree che non sono foresta su un'area così vasta? Vedi l'area di Civitella di Romagna per esempio.
Ciao
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 19:26:36+00:00): Si, certo, ma si presuppone che potenzialmente qualcun altro possa teoricamente collaborare. Sembra che tu dia per scontato che questa relazione debba definirla solo io. E cmq se vai a vedere la relazione 12348593 ti accorgerai che un area dopo un area, la zona interessata è molto differente rispetto a 3 mesi fa. Infine considera i tempi che OSM impiega ad aggiornare un determinato riquadro in un determinato livello di zoom: facendo quindi periodi su zone diverse, lascio il tempo per aggiornare in modo che poi vedo "in diretta" le aree da fare. Piuttosto avrei un quesito da proporti, visto che sembri più "informato" di me: un parco regionale diviso in 4 aree di cui 3 conccentriche che relazione faresti? Il parco in questione lo vedi chiaramente qua file:///C:/Users/ML/AppData/Local/Temp/PR_VenaGessoRomagnola_A1.pdf
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 19:28:13+00:00): scusa, era un link in locale :-( questo il link https https://ambiente.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/parchi-natura2000/aree-protette/parchi/vege/mappa
Lola Fox (2021-04-12 19:28:43+00:00): indirizzo diretto https://ambiente.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/parchi-natura2000/aree-protette/immagini-aapp/carte-aapp/carta_zone_PR_Vena.pdf/@@download/file/PR_VenaGessoRomagnola_A1.pdf
sorcrosc (2021-04-14 19:50:01+00:00): Grazie che te ne stai ancora occupando ma ho passato tanto tempo a rifinire grandi aree ed è un lavoro più pesante che mappare da zero.
La relazione continuerà a diventare sempre più ingestibile e dovrai suddividerla. Faresti meglio a mappare aree più piccole evitando così di introdurre errori, anche se momentanei.
sorcrosc (2021-04-14 20:00:37+00:00): Del parco non saprei come mappare separatamente le varie zone. Per cosa si distinguono? Ci sono livelli di protezione differenti che si possono ricondurre a questi? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
Lola Fox (2021-04-14 20:29:23+00:00): Credo di no. Cmq ci avevo già pensato a suddividerla. Se guardi si può "facilmente fare" utilizzando lo spartiacque del fiume Savio. Chiedo un consiglio: io procederei dividendo le due macro zone a est e ovest del fiume, ma poi quella a est, che verrebbe ad avere meno relazioni (aree inner) la devo riassegnare a nuova relazione, cancellando la mnuova macro area e  ogni vecchia area ineer (che diverrebbero tutte linee bianche) e poi creo ex novo la relazione. La domanda è: c'è un metodo più veloce per "riassegnare" una parte di relazioni ? Io credo di no ma dimmi pure tu. Grazie. PS. Vedo che ne sai più di me, dunque ben vengano i tuoi suggerimenti
Lola Fox (2021-04-14 20:31:45+00:00): Il problema del parco è che è un insieme di 4 aree, 3 delle quali una dentro l'altra (e fin qui andrebbe +/- tutto bene) ma la 4 è in parte esterna e in parte interna.
user_8466505 (2021-07-26 22:44:05+00:00): Hey there! Would you mind elaborating on the brownfield point you added? I cannot find it on aerial imagery.

Thanks, 
TheAdventurer64
ash_win (2021-04-12 09:50:34+00:00): Hi No-identity,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly way 437742588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102791520
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102756660
MoiraPrime (2021-04-12 01:29:42+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future you should keep in mind a simple rule: 1 feature, 1 OSM element. Also, you should map lakes and reservoirs using their respective presets.If you apply the name to the body of water you create, it will show up on the map. No need to add several labels to it.
PT-53 (2021-04-18 09:17:59+00:00): Hallo KHSH,
Du hast an diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232371316/history
das Merkmal
oneway=yes
ergänzt. Dies steht aber im Widerspruch zu den Merkmalen
- lanes:backward=1
- lanes:forward=1

Was stimmt?
Fragende Grüße

Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2021-04-25 06:25:01+00:00): Hallo KHSH, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du nocht antworten würdest.
Grüße

Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2021-04-25 06:50:19+00:00): Hallo KHSH, 
ich habe jetzt die Lanes-Angaben angepaßt.
Grüße
faustopt (2021-05-11 09:41:33+00:00): VANDALIZAÇÂO - Alteração incorreta da toponímia e curso do rio Techimbolele. O rio intermitente que atravessa a Fazenda NNN é o rio Ungandge ou Ungange. O Rio Techimbolele termina na interseção com o rio Ngoluacuoco. FONTE: Ministério do Ambiente, Parque Nacional do Bicuar - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Lgydz--QdQls3aG4xZgr3juG0iyrpw61/view?usp=sharing
user_5359 (2021-04-12 15:31:38+00:00): Hallo! Kleiner Hinweis: Ich habe den Tippfehler bei addr:suburb bereits korrigiert, aber achte bitte bei den nächsten Eintragungen auf die korrekte Schreibweise
SafetyIng (2021-04-12 16:29:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
A67-A67 (2021-04-11 23:05:54+00:00): Dit is geen dubbel gras, maar de polygoon die het park representeert. Een park wordt als een 'transparant' over het gras, water en andere landgebruik heen getekend.
pieleric (2021-04-12 06:52:51+00:00): Ouch... sorry, had ik verkeerde gezien. Ik zie dat je heb het al hersteld, dus ik ga niks doen. Bedenkt !
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 05:34:55+00:00): Hii JoshuaGramaje,
I have fixed incorrect geometry at node 8374388482. Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102767984.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102757460
5m4u9 (2021-04-12 03:56:51+00:00): hi, combuyo as a place is already mapped (node), your area duplicates the data.
LySioS (2021-04-12 11:23:56+00:00): Bonjour et [bienvenue](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue)
Tes modifications sont bonnes. J'ai repris les bâtiments que tu avais agrandis car cela ne correspond ni au cadastre ni à la photo aérienne.

A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102758138
Patchanka (2022-07-16 08:29:32+00:00): bonjour
la voie à l'intérieur du cimetière :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611854298
Vous l'avez mappée en tant que voie verte. C'est vraiment ça ? Ça me parait bizarre
mueschel (2021-04-12 14:01:06+00:00): Hi,
you used many tags here that are not used in any other place, what do they mean?

  jogging = medium
  patins = yes
  piso = alcatrao
  skate = yes
  trotinetes = yes

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (with
very few exceptions). Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.
o_andras (2021-09-25 22:07:30+00:00): @mueschel The tags you listed are Portuguese words: patins=roller skates/ice skates; piso=ground/floor; alcatrao=asphalt; trotinete=scooter.

I don't know if you've reviewed the changeset in full (I haven't), but if you think it's in general more harm than good, can you please revert?

At a glance, the names look wrong/unnecessary: trilho=track/trail; jardim=garden; terreno de cultivo=farm land; etc.
eggie (2021-04-12 06:01:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2021-04-12 00:11:27+00:00): Hello.
Just because you want your website to look a certain way doesn't mean you can just go and vandalize the map used by millions of people around the world.
The official and proper name of nyc IS "New York". If you want your website to look a certain way, you should contact your webmaster to make changes there.
This edit have been reverted in changeset 102760117
Polarbear (2022-10-29 23:44:50+00:00): Die Fahrradstation ist bereits seit 2020 als Node in dem Gebäude. 

Da das eine untergeordnete Nutzung ist, wird das auch nicht an den Umring des Hauses getaggt, und der Name des Hauses ist auch nicht Täve. 

Repariert.
cyel (2021-04-12 15:39:08+00:00): Bonjour Bobos-Seven,

Je viens de voir cette relation et je trouve super de rajouter des itinéraires vtt/pédestre sur OSM!
J'ai vu que tu as super bien décrit la relation. Pour aller encore plus loin, il est possible de décrire le symbole pour qu'il s'affiche sur des cartes comme : https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!43.8004!-0.775
Pour cela il faut utiliser le tag osmc:symbol. Tu trouveras toutes les informations nécéssaires sur la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol. Dans le cas de cet itinéraire, cela donnerai osmc:symbol = blue:white:blue_bar

Cyel
Bobos-Seven (2021-04-12 17:41:25+00:00): Bonjour Cyel,
Je vous remercie pour vos encouragements !
J’avais essayé le symbol « blue:white:blue_bar » tel que vous me l’avait indiqué, mais le « bleu » du TAG OSM est assez éloigné du bleu « #2993b6 » retenu par le Conseil Départemental pour ses balises.
Du coup, on a préféré ne pas mettre de « symbol » et spécifier la couleur dans les balises, comme cela elle apparait au moins correctement dans la description du circuit.
Êtes-vous du même avis ?

Sincères salutations.
cyel (2021-04-12 18:21:58+00:00): Bonsoir Bobos-Seven,

(Tutoie moi, il n'y a pas de soucis)

En effet, dans ce cas-là, cela devient une question épineuse ! 

Je pense qu'entre les deux réponses, suivant les contributeurs d'OSM, tu n'auras pas la même réponse. 

Je te donne tout de même la mienne !
osmc:symbol apporte une information visuelle sans nécessité de lecture qui est appréciée sur une carte qui par définition représente la réalité par des symboles. Je le mettrai donc même si la couleur ne correspond pas tout à fait. 
Cela restera à améliorer; peut-être faudrait-il lancer une discussion sur la liste OSM-France pour plus d'avis et de conseils pour utiliser au mieux la couleur choisie par le Conseil Départemental dans le tag osm:symbol mais là, ça sort de mes compétences. Peut-être déjà voir avec les personnes 
qui vous ont initiés à OSM?

Cordialement,

Cyel
!bm (2021-04-13 20:27:52+00:00): Hallo toniber, 

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Statt Löschen eines leerstehenden Geschäftslokals o.a. POI ist es in den allermeisten Fällen besser, disused:* [1] oder ein anderes, passendes Lifecycle-Prefix zu verwenden.[2]

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll.[3][4]

Entsprechend korrigiert.

Happy mapping!

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

--besteGrüße!bm
toniber (2021-04-14 00:38:11+00:00): In den Nutzungsbestimmungen steht, dass KEINE historischen Daten hinterlegt werden sollen, sondern nur der aktuelle Stand. Ich wohne zufällig genau in diesem Haus: Grauzone ist dort nicht mehr anzutreffen, sie haben den Betrieb komplett eingestellt. Aber dass Café WIM ist dort eingezogen. In der Karte ist es nun komplett falsch dargestellt: dort steht Grauzone (in der Hausnummer 70, was schon immer falsch war) und das WIN ist gänzlich verschwunden.
Meine knappe Zeit ist aber zu wertvoll, um mich um die Details zu kümmern, wenn das so kompliziert ist. Dann ist die Karte eben nicht aktuell bzw. falsch. Ich weiß es, und gut ist. Ich werde dann eben keine weiteren Änderungen zur Richtigstellung der Fehler eingeben.
Danke, Bernd
pio2_122 (2021-04-12 07:37:13+00:00): Please, do not use the Bing layer - it is very outdated for most of Poland. One of the most up-to-date and only properly calibrated layer for Poland is "Geoportal 2: Orthophotomap". Not without reason it is described in the editor as "the best known base layer for this area".
In this case, you have mapped the course of the road from a time when construction of the actual road had not yet begun. The Geoportal layer shows the road already completed. That was the state on the map before this edit.
I have reverted this edit.
snopas24 (2021-04-11 23:40:33+00:00): Correct changeset description should read "Continuing adding sidewalks and crosswalks at Crossroads at Orenco Station "
manasak448 (2021-04-11 23:14:40+00:00): Tracing Buildings
mdejean (2021-05-14 22:21:26+00:00): A road bridge is not a motorway.
FlowerHillPerson (2022-03-10 15:58:38+00:00): Understood. I thought that since it was a divided highway, it was, but I guess not. Apologies.
manasak448 (2021-04-11 23:29:52+00:00): Tracing Buildings
VictorIE (2022-12-23 06:45:58+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928990961

You have this as Bellingsmore Drive, whereas on site it appears to be The Drive (I hate addresses like "The Drive").
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 15:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104066832 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
clay_c (2021-04-19 19:10:47+00:00): Reverted. Please use more meaningful comments than "station groups" so other mappers know what you've done and why.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103218877
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
Glassman (2021-04-12 05:33:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

To merge the node and your park, select both the node and the polygon, then right click then use the + icon to merge them. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102761922
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
Glassman (2021-04-12 05:36:19+00:00): Did the trail get renamed? It was called the Tammi Wilson Memorial trail. I was even their for the opening. If it was renamed, then I'd suggest updating the name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102762184
Dendros (2021-04-14 01:12:10+00:00): It is still the same.   Burlington city website has Gages Slough Trail as an alternate name.  There are signs onsite too as I recall.  I could not figure out how to do an alternate name.
Glassman (2021-04-17 02:29:50+00:00): I changed it to the tag alt_name=Gages Slough Trail.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 12:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103271186 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
Becky Candy (2021-05-03 08:29:28+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102762412
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 23:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103156859 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
kartonage (2021-04-12 09:10:31+00:00): Hej,

in this changeset you have deleted a lot of buildings that are stil present (http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102762424). Although some of them did not seem right or present (as in scrubs mapped as buildings) and falsly tagged, please don't just delete all of them. If you can, please improve the existing buildings.

I have restored most of the buildings.
Thank you.
Becky Candy (2021-05-03 08:35:52+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102762563
Becky Candy (2021-05-03 08:35:53+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102762563
ravali_78 (2021-05-05 05:27:17+00:00): Hi Min Hui,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104158157.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102762620