piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2020-08-25 15:18:32+00:00): Proszę nie mapuj "dzikich" przejść przez tory (mam na myśli https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840578280).
Po pierwsze: grozi to śmiercią - można potknąć się o szynę, przewrócić na nierównym podtorzu, nierzadko widoczność jest ograniczona przez roślinność, itp.
Po drugie: jest to nielegalne. „Osoby zatrzymane na nielegalnym przechodzeniu przez tory narażają się na mandat lub sprawę w sądzie.”

Sądzę, że zostało zrobione to nieumyślnie, ale byłoby naprawdę źle gdyby przez to ktoś mógł się narazić na ww. niebezpieczeństwa.

Oficjalne przejazdy są zazwyczaj oznakowane, a ich lokalizację można sprawdzić w geoportalu (https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/o-geoportalu/aktualnosci/-/asset_publisher/HCHq0YGNRszn/content/16-01-2019-lokalizacja-przejazdow-kolejowych-w-geoportalu/pop_up?inheritRedirect=true)

Swoją drogą, pamiętam przynajmniej jedną uwagę od użytkownika związanego z koleją właśnie na ten temat, gdzie prosił o usunięcie takiego dzikiego przejścia z mapy - i zostało to zrobione.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-25 15:42:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:27:26+00:00): Dag stosso,
Goede toevoeging !
In de wiki hebben we echter wat afspraken vastgelegd om de fietspaden correct te taggen.
Dus graag nog toevoegen:
mofa=designated
trafficsign=NL:G12a
Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden
stosso123 (2020-08-26 10:45:35+00:00): Oke bedankt voor de tip ik zal het meteen toevoegen
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-08-26 11:33:43+00:00): Hallo,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap! Dit is een gedeelde kaart, elke aanpassing die je doet is zichtbaar voor iedereen en diverse apps (OsmAnd, Facebook, Bike2Work, Maps.me, ...)

Ik heb je 'testhuis' dus terug verwijderd aangezien het duidelijk een test is.
Arne Schwarck (2020-08-25 15:37:13+00:00): Quellen: GPS
aharvey (2020-09-01 11:50:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840589945/history should have the road name that was existing before the split, there are other places this happens to if you could please check those too.
jet_01 (2020-09-01 15:08:11+00:00): Hello Andrew,

Thanks for flagging, made the necessary changes now as suggested. I would extend the name and other relevant tags in such cases going forward :)
mueschel (2020-08-28 17:26:17+00:00): The tag 'solar power = station' is not used in any other place. Please check the wiki to find how to tag solar power generators.
dgitto (2020-09-09 07:58:05+00:00): I don't think is possible to use Navionics data as source.:-)
lehmannkaiberlin (2020-09-09 08:10:48+00:00): ah, ok, what do we need to do now?
lehmannkaiberlin (2020-09-09 08:12:06+00:00): what is the official way of documenting this? Like visual sighting?
dgitto (2020-09-09 09:02:20+00:00): Visual survey, or source with appropriate licence. See the wiki.
No problem for this small edits, but could be better to remove the "source" tag
Maxizouzoute (2021-02-11 08:43:17+00:00): Bonjour, l'appellation "réserve forestière" n'est plus en vigueur à Mayotte depuis 2012. Serait-il possible de modifier ? Il faudrait remplacer par "Forêt départementale de Majimbini"
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-26 07:48:19+00:00): Ciao. Attenzione alle modifiche che fai. Spesso agganci elementi distinti insieme. In questo caso un edificio e Via Italia: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=89924930 Ciao, Andrea
bison166 (2020-08-26 05:28:39+00:00): moin...ich würde hier eher amenity=fast_food sagen und nicht Restaurant.
siehe auch Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:amenity
Gerhard42 (2020-08-26 16:21:35+00:00): beim Pasa gebe ich dir natürlich recht, beim Sicilia bin ich mir noch nicht einig. Die verkaufen auch italienische Spezialitäten außer Haus...
scheint ganz neu zu sein
Maxizouzoute (2021-02-11 08:45:27+00:00): Bonjour, l'appellation "réserve forestière" n'est plus en vigueur à Mayotte depuis 2012. Serait-il possible de modifier ? Il faudrait remplacer par "Massif forestier des Monts Dziani-Bolé et Hachiroungou"
aceman444 (2020-11-22 12:03:37+00:00): Hi, why do you add a playground that already exists at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411612132 ? Also, "Playground" isn't it's official name so why do you make stuff up? It does not need a name tagged, if there is none.
ToniE (2020-08-26 07:32:03+00:00): Servus,

hat man hier die Altenhagener Straße (124271904) von secondary auf path runtergestuft? 
Ich glaube, das war ein Versehen beim Editieren?

Gruß
Toni
bus-mt (2020-08-26 11:56:55+00:00): Ja, war ein Versehen. Keine Ahnung, wieso die mit geändert wurde. Ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89970519 korrigiert.
Danke für's Aufpassen!
ToniE (2020-08-26 12:30:36+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion.

Sollte dann morgen hier

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NW/DE-NW-WT-Analysis.html#bus_33-2

als korrigiert sichtbar werden.

Gruß
Toni
gabrielalves (2020-08-28 08:27:43+00:00): Your edit is wrong. The satellite image version does not match the current road situation.
ShayMaps (2020-08-28 19:17:39+00:00): Thank you for letting me know and correcting the mistake.
5m4u9 (2020-08-25 23:40:24+00:00): entonces el río Ñ a la derecha esta mal?
user_2066394 (2020-08-25 20:40:34+00:00): Die Flächen verlieren dann aber ohne leisure=swimming_area ihr Hauptmerkmal?
Ohr (2020-08-26 18:52:58+00:00): Du hast ja Recht, ich habe da schon mit mir gerungen und bin auf keinen grünen Zweig gekommen. Leider  ist leisure=swimming_area halt für eine Wasserfläche zum Baden gedacht und nicht für die Liegewiese. Ich baue es jetzt ordentlich um, so dass es getrennte landuses mit den jeweiligen Tags werden.
cforin (2020-08-25 17:55:53+00:00): Added full building geo seen from aerial imagery for entire campus #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89928574
nurdafur (2021-05-20 08:28:35+00:00): Hi Tungmar
In this changeset you merged two tracks. While doing so a part of a relation got lost. I ask you that you watch for relations before merging tracks. 
Have fun continuing mapping.

Kind regards
Urs
Tungmar (2021-05-21 17:06:32+00:00): Hello Urs
Thank you for the hint! I will check more for the relations.
Sorry for the trouble!
SimonPoole (2020-09-08 09:15:13+00:00): Hallo Blade MBPC

Irgendwas ging hier sehr schief, du hast aus der Grenze des Wohngebiets um Horgen herum eine Strasse gemacht. Ich habe diesen Changeset völlig revertiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90574137
Martin Borsje (2020-08-25 19:12:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
ottwiz (2020-08-30 10:21:36+00:00): You should mark which imagery did you use. I see you used Maxar, just first i'd guess it was Bing, but not. If you mark it, then it helps us to help or continue to map the area
ottwiz (2020-08-30 10:21:52+00:00): with the imagery you used first ;)
ohiomapper (2020-08-30 10:26:43+00:00): I used several imagery. Maxar is the most recent but usually it has some offset. So I use Esri Clarity or Bing as the normal imagery and compare it with Maxar. But in such mountainous areas it is very difficult because all imagery have some offset.
ottwiz (2020-08-30 11:34:07+00:00): Yeah, it's a problem, but be aware that Esri is old, more than 5-10 years, even if it's very clear. It's a good idea to compare to other imageries.
bhietsch (2020-08-26 00:43:16+00:00): Kudos to you! This is a great example of how important it is to read the wiki as I (and likely many others) assumed that building=house was the best tag for most residential homes
mbeyerle (2020-08-26 01:12:56+00:00): Thanks! I think iD or other editors have a great opportunity in improving tag suggestions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mbeyerle/diary/393767
ramthelinefeed (2020-10-08 15:21:31+00:00): Mr Raiph, those streets do have cycle-markings on the carriageway.  Admittedly this is the mostly rubbish and lowly form of 'cycle route' in London (no route number, no waymarking signs) but it still widely used by a lot of the boroughs. (Indeed I'd say anything up to 20% of the un-named un-numbered 'local cycle routes' on OpenStreetMap in London are of this type.
R0ckhopper (2020-10-12 08:12:43+00:00): Thanks for your interest. These cycle markings were added when what was formerly a gyratory was returned to two-way in order to raise driver awareness cyclists might be present. They don't create a route, just like SLOW markings don't create a slow travel route! Also LB Southwark (the highway authority) does not consider this as a route in any of its transport or other documents.

When I get back from hols I will post something to talk-osm-gb as the question of what is a cycle route is often misunderstood in the UK in particular in London and is divergent from other countries. So your point is very much worth wider discussion.
ramthelinefeed (2020-10-12 08:31:48+00:00): Yeah. It's an interesting point whether or not a London Borough (or TfL) 'considers' something to be a route or not... My impression is that record keeping amongst these bodies is extremely poor (for instance, if you search on TfL's cycling document archive, you'll find reports of the 'Greenways' scheme that ran circa 2009-2014, in between the 'London Cycle Network Plus' and the 'Quietways' schemes... but when I did an FoI request for a definitive list of the 'routes' under this scheme, I was told they no longer had that info as it was 'so long ago' lmao).  Similarly I have had various London boroughs tell me the London Cycle Network no longer exists (despite there demonstrably being about 900 miles of route signage for it all across the city).  The cycle maps produced by many of the boroughs have not been updated for about 10 years. And then TfL's current online cycle map is, to be brutal, an incoherent inaccurate mess, full of things that don't exist yet and omitting things that do.  ... all in all, whilst Highway Authorities' statements on these things ought to be definitive, they're frequently complete pants. Which is one of the reasons OSM is so important as an alternative :) 

There are hundreds of streets across London with these vestigial cycle markings on the carriageway, sometimes accompanied by blue rectangular 'cycle' signs (which the Highway Code describes as a 'route recommended for cyclists'). Most of these have been spotted and added to OSM as lowly 'local' routes. Many of the LCN+ routes are waymarked only by these carriageway markings (perhaps it was a policy to 'avoid street clutter). LCN65, which goes SE to NW through these streets, is only carriageway marked through Southwark in the same fashion - there's little to distinguish it from the adjacent roads in question here (eg Brayard's Road vs Blackpool Road).  Arguably LCN65 shouldn't be a tagged as a route either. 
I tend to favour tagging them as there is often a tenuous logic for them being a good choice of route to go in a particular direction. 

Also, despite borough's generally professing not to have any records of these markings, you'll usually find that they refresh them if they re-surface the road. Which suggests there's some staff and/or records there who do know about them, but just aren't part of the same team who answer FoI emails ;)
ramthelinefeed (2020-10-12 08:52:02+00:00): (Sorry I seem to have digressed a bit there!) - on a very specific point, you're suggesting that some/all of those carriageway 'cycle' markings are the equivalent of a triangular 'caution - cyclists!' warning sign for motorists? 
Whereas I (other some other editors) have been interpreting them as the equivalent of a blue rectangular 'route recommended for cyclists' sign?
Sembola (2022-04-05 06:04:23+00:00): I see a track/cycleway crossing the (unused, it seems) ends of runway 24/06 on the southern side of airport, but on Strava Heatmaps it seems nobody have ridden or walked/run there. It is really accessible?
StijnRR (2022-04-05 17:57:04+00:00): No idea. This edit is an armchair mapping edit in which I improved what I could, but I haven't been there.
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:33:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-11-30 13:12:03+00:00): voce nao deveria ter transformado esta linha: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337795215 em uma via track. desfiz essa edição. depois checarei as outras.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:44:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89931451
FredrikLindseth (2020-08-25 19:26:14+00:00): iD editing from the phone 🤯. The changeset comment was supposed to be "remove ele from Lille lungegårdsvann"
sipka (2020-09-01 07:40:12+00:00): serus,
co bolo duplicitne na mene "Čistinka"
dik
FishDoctor (2020-09-01 07:58:02+00:00): Keď máš uprostred lesa zakreslenú čistinku (malú lúku) s názvom "Čistinka" tak je to zbytočné. Je evidentné, že je to čistinka. Ani holoruby sa nepomenovávajú Holorub. Navyše by nemali byť v OSM body s názvom bez označenia typu objektu napr. landuse=meadow, office=company...
sipka (2020-09-01 08:03:36+00:00): ono to v podstate ani nieje luka ale krizovatka ciest a orientacne vyznamny bod a miestny ho odjakziva nazyvaju Cistinka, tak som si myslel ze by bolo vhodne ho aj tak nazvat...
FishDoctor (2020-09-01 08:37:52+00:00): Ďakujem za upresnenie. Doplnil som tag loc_name=Čistinka.
sipka (2020-09-01 08:55:06+00:00): ok, dik.
muralito (2020-08-26 14:38:54+00:00): why did you do this change?
mappylite (2020-08-27 19:28:29+00:00): A Maps user requested the street name be updated.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:42:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89931917
literan (2020-08-26 17:06:25+00:00): передаю твои координаты в МВД
Cyclono (2020-08-25 22:33:27+00:00): de wegen lopen onder het gebouw door. Je kan de eenrichtingsverkeer pijlen zien op de luchtfotos. 

Dus oneway klopt wel
emvee (2020-08-26 18:28:47+00:00): Goed, ik zal er eens gaan kijken en dan proberen ook de wegen onder het gebouw te mappen en dan de oneway weer toe te voegen.
literan (2020-08-26 17:04:51+00:00): зачем вы удалили теги перехода? откачу.
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:38:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:44:05+00:00): Dag Stan,
Het is niet de bedoeling om complete reclame blokken op de kaart te zetten.
ik pas het even aan.
mueschel (2020-08-26 18:05:48+00:00): Hi,
there is larger number of objects with two tags that are not used in other places,
Grade=II
ListEntry=1386565

Could you check and find some common tags for this? I guess it's listed_status and ref:XYZ.
loveshack (2020-08-26 20:07:22+00:00): Thanks; I'll fix them.  JOSM keeps failing to catch things like that which should have been changed from the imported data.  How did you find them?
mueschel (2020-08-26 21:05:57+00:00): I'm running a daily check on Taginfo to find keys that are new:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Xqj
mrJtwo (2020-08-25 23:47:54+00:00): Se actualiza en general la zona urbana de Leticia y algunos lugares de interés publico.
tekim (2021-05-28 15:17:03+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.  Regarding: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840670701, a "bus_guideway" is for "busway that is side guided "rails like" for the exclusive use of guided buses" - there are no guides here, it is just a regular road that is for the use of buses.
StackKorora (2021-05-29 19:03:32+00:00): Good catch. That was a mistag on my part. Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-26 06:21:34+00:00): Hi Silvo20, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting the way with the following tags: name=Pokopališče, landuse=cemetery, religion=christian and denomination=catholic ? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
5m4u9 (2020-08-25 23:45:35+00:00): hola, no es necesario poner el nombre a todas las cosas, en realidad solo a las que tengan nombre propio como un negocio, una calle, un monumento

poner nombre a un grupo de arboles no está bien, si esta bien si es un bosquecillo o un área relevante y grande

la categorias que pone OSM (etiquetas) diferencian unas de otras, la idea de un mapa es utilizar colores y simbolos para los elementos físicos
5m4u9 (2020-08-25 23:50:58+00:00): otra cosa importante es no repetir un elemento dos veces, por ejemplo, un area de arboles y poner en cada arbol, o también, un área como kiosko y al lado un punto como kiosko, debe ser uno u otro.
Reeniz (2020-08-25 20:54:12+00:00): Para que eliminas una "barrier=gate" para agregar la misma de nuevo?
Reeniz (2020-08-25 20:55:10+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/89934048?aoi=21f12239-620d-4824-9b37-c02a6d5203be
RiverBearings (2020-08-25 23:11:26+00:00): Hola Reeniz, me di cuenta de que el historial del objeto original que tenía su nombre agregado en 2011 por felipeedwards se perdió durante una fusión con un nodo existente y las etiquetas se transfirieron allí. Sentí que valía la pena conservar la información de archivo para que la comunidad de OSM en general pudiera consultarla en el futuro, así que restauré la función de OSM original.
¡Gracias por comunicarse!
RiverBearings.
Reeniz (2020-08-25 23:36:04+00:00): Entiendo. Gracias por la respuesta!
BAK365 (2020-09-07 11:00:42+00:00): Hallo,
Die Hausnummern beim Zeughaus und beim Schulhaus Riedern sind schon vorhanden, jeweils als Knoten am Haupteingang.
Grüsse
BAK365

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7596234665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7626516068
DD1GJ (2020-08-26 07:39:43+00:00): Hallo Tim1804,

das war leider nicht so optimal. Da liegt jetzt Wald auf Wald und bei DA Abteilung 219  auch über der Autobahn. Zudem sind auch amtliche Stadtpläne meistens urheberrechtlich geschützt. Hauptziel von OSM ist, einen wirklich freien Datenbestand aus eigenen Beobachtungen und zulässigen Quellen zu erstellen.
Tim1804 (2020-08-29 08:34:31+00:00): Erstmal sorry das ich mich jetzt erst melde, 
Dass mit Wald auf Wald ist nicht optimal,
Allerdings die Frage die sich mir stellt wenn ich durch den Wald laufe und an den Bäumen die Abt. Nummern ablese ist das okay? Was sind den alles zulässige Quellen?
Lg
Tim
DD1GJ (2020-08-30 06:34:48+00:00): Dinge einzutragen, die Du selbst vor Ort gesehen hast und deren Position mit GPS oder eindeutigen Merkmalen auf der OSM-Karte ermittelst hast, wäre ok. Weitere zulässige Quellen wären gemeinfreie amtliche Bekanntmachungen, die im Editor hinterlegten Luftbilder oder ausdrücklich für OSM freigegebene Daten wie z.B. https://www.mapillary.com/osm . Du solltest allerdings beurteilen können, ob solche externen Daten (noch) der aktuellen Realität vor Ort entsprechen.

Die Verwendung unzulässiger Quellen gefährdet das Projekt.
TravGW (2020-08-25 21:18:49+00:00): What is your reasoning behind changing access=private to access=yes on driveways in this changeset and other changesets in the past? The majority of these driveways lead to oil wells/tanks and should not used by the public. Plus they are often behind no trespassing signs or some other warning/danger sign. That is why I've marked them as private.
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-26 06:22:23+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89934851
NieWnen (2020-08-26 04:31:36+00:00): Hej, usunąłeś w tej zmianie oneway:bicycle=no na jednokierunkowych dot. kontraruchu.

Zdjęli tabliczkę "Nie dotyczy rowerów"?
Hubson334 (2020-08-26 16:59:35+00:00): Tabliczka nie została zdjęta, jednak czy prawidłowe jest stwierdzenie w tym przypadku na drodze jednokierunkowej "jednokierunkowa dla rowerów=tak". Po ostatniej aktualizacji map w aplikacji OsmAnd w trybie jazdy rowerowej, jadąc na zachód trasa nie prowadziła przez tę drogę, gdyż widziała ją jako jednokierunkową na wschód. Dlatego drogą dedukcji uznałem że znacznik jest błędny. Jeżeli moja poprawka jest nieprawidłowa, proszę o jej sprostowania i małe wyjaśnienie :) pozdr
NieWnen (2020-08-26 19:13:11+00:00): Chyba nie rozumiem. 

W przypadku drogi tak jak tutaj –jednokierunkowej service, jeśli dołożymy tag oneway:bicycle=no – to zezwalamy na ruch w obu kierunkach dla rowerów (zgodnie z tabliczką "Nie dotyczy rowerów" pod znakiem B2 "Zakaz wjazdu").

Jeżeli powyższy tag zostanie usunięty/ustawiony na "yes" (tak jak nastąpiło w tej zmianie), to już rower będzie mógł jechać tylko w 1 kierunku.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle

Co do routingu, nie potrafię na to odpowiedzieć, ale wiem, że bywa on problematyczny również przy innych sytuacjach i tu pewnie trzeba by było zapytać na forum osm.
Hubson334 (2020-08-26 20:10:15+00:00): ok, już naniosłem poprawkę zgodnie z powyższym.
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-26 06:22:29+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89934827
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:46:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
luisforte (2020-08-25 22:23:48+00:00): Viva Ricardo,
Insisto no pedido que te fiz anteriormente: não apagues toda uma estrada, a EM 119, e cries uma estrada nova, só porque pretendes fazer correções na mesma.
Não faz sentido além de que se perde o histórico.
Luis
AntMadeira (2020-08-28 01:19:08+00:00): Olá, dricardo023.

A recente edição que fizeste na EM 119 é bem-vinda, no entanto, vai contra uma das regras do OpenStreetMap: manter o histórico.
Se quiseres editar uma estrada ou outro elemento, como uma área ou um ponto, o histórico desse elemento deve ser mantido, pois é o trabalho de outros contribuidores.
No caso da EM 119, apagaste um histórico de vários anos e de vários contribuidores.
Uma vez que esta informação já te tinha sido transmitida e como esta foi uma edição que afeta um longo histórico, irei reverter este changeset.
Peço que nas tuas próximas edições tenhas isso em consideração.
Qualquer dúvida, convidamos-te a participar no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OSM, onde poderás debater estes e outros assuntos.
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Ao dispor,
António Madeira.
JOTA13 (2020-08-25 21:36:04+00:00): No crees que estás faltando el respeto de usuarios y de la comunidad de Open Street Map y te estás saltando los consensos de la comunidad por puro interés ideológico y partidista? Deja de contaminar OSM, por favor.
wireguy (2020-08-26 11:01:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM Asteroid!   Nice start in Pennington.   I bike the area and have it on my list to map one day.   Tips/comments,  'Q' key will square a selected building.  Buildings are usually  rectangular or have corners with right angles.   Try and map the building footprint (don't map the roof pitch points).  For the senior center, map the building separate from the parking (parking outline gets the amenity=parking tag).
Keep mapping!   Let me know if you have any questions.
VitalieS (2020-08-26 00:21:45+00:00): Hello. Is this a bar or home? If it's a bar, how is it called and what's the address of it or where it is exactly located ?
ACarlotti (2020-08-25 21:59:27+00:00): Oops, I failed to add a comment.
Revert changesets 89635942, 89634946, 89579256, and add a slightly different tagging to Histon Road to indicate that the closure is temporary.
karson_ (2020-08-26 11:23:40+00:00): Please stop adding features that do not exist. The map is used by other people and anything you add will be displayed to everyone
Fabe56 (2020-08-26 07:39:31+00:00): Merci cette série d'ajouts, tip top !
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-26 07:29:41+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki!
Cascafico (2020-08-26 12:22:00+00:00): se sicuro che abbiano rimosso la milestone del km4 SR305?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89936672
user_11166885 (2020-08-27 01:01:10+00:00): No, era duplicata