piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Self-Perfection (2017-05-30 21:02:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. На всякий случай поясняю, что произошло: вы своей правкой отредактировали описание магазина "магнит" в OpenStreetMap (OSM), это изменение было бы видно всем, что пользуется картами на основе (OSM), в т.ч. всем пользователям MAPS.ME. Вот только правка ваша некорректна. Магазин расположен в доме 32, а не 23, как вы указали, да и вообще проставлять адреса заведениям внутри зданий не требуется, достаточно адреса на здании, а он уже есть. Я откатил вашу правку, т.е. вернул описание магазина в состояние до правки.
Sergey Bashkov (2017-05-30 21:43:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Дело в том, что магазина магнит в доме 32 по ул.Шипиловская никогда не было. Он был в доме 32А. Сейчас магазин закрыли и перенесли его по адресу ул. Генерала Белова д 23, что я и указал в правке.
Self-Perfection (2017-05-31 22:27:16+00:00): Спасибо за пояснение, стало понятнее, что к чему. Неудобно, что пользовательские заметки хранятся отдельно от правок, так что вашу заметку с пояснением https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1013895 я вчера не заметил.

А сегодня literan точку магазина уже подвинул на нужное здание.
highflyer74 (2017-05-31 13:27:43+00:00): Hello Eikai! Could you try to reduce the attached non-OSM keys (like "vedenpinna") to a minimum? As you know OSM has its own tagging system which should not be bloated with non-OSM data. All the best, Oliver
Thundercel (2017-05-31 01:19:17+00:00): Please Sturm br, do not employ natural = coastline to define the margin of the natural = water. See in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline the correct employment for natural = coastline
Creator13 (2017-05-30 16:47:49+00:00): The source on this is wrong, should be "local knowledge, BDOrtho IGN, Bing"
highflyer74 (2017-05-31 13:38:39+00:00): Hello mavl! But does it mean now? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4884671721 :-) All the best from Germany!
mavl (2017-05-31 14:29:50+00:00): Hello. I'm sorry about it. It was temporary object. Now it is shop in a village :-)  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49137870
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:38:42+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
marsbar28 (2017-06-04 15:06:16+00:00): you've deleted a building which is still there; also two of the stands are still there awaiting demolition
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 09:50:13+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Hjart (2017-05-30 18:36:34+00:00): Please note that the naming of fakta was intended
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 13:21:36+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202719
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:38:38+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
sorcrosc (2017-08-17 12:54:09+00:00): Ciao,
cos'e' questo sentiero denominato "giro Volperino Popola".
Si tratta di un itinerario conosciuto con questo nome?
sorcrosc (2017-08-18 20:47:21+00:00): Ho eliminato il nome e le parti di percorso duplicate rispetto alle strade gia' mappate in precedenza
srbrook (2017-05-30 21:48:56+00:00): I don't think the name tag should have been removed from the Bus Stop. The name tag is part of the Napton import of bus stop data and refers to the name of the Bus Stop not the garage that happens to be opposite it.
JackieUpton (2017-05-31 07:39:49+00:00): I've restored it.  However, I would question the accuracy of the information.  The bus stop according to the map is in the middle of a flower bed - it should be where the footpath joins Hanley Road.  The bus stop on the other side of the road should be further up Hanley Road, outside the car park, not in front of the garage.
Thanks

Jackie
srbrook (2017-05-31 13:30:10+00:00): The bus stop positions imported from the Napton database are often a bit misplaced. If you have local knowledge of their correct position, just move the node to where the bus stop sign is.
user_3216889 (2017-05-31 11:54:16+00:00): Teun,

Bij voetpad niet footway=sidewalk toevoegen (gebeurt helaas in de editor iD als je kiest voor trottoir). Sidewalk gebruiken we in Nederland alleen voor een trottoir pal langs een weg, en dan komt dat op de weg zelf te staan en wordt het pad meestal niet ingetekend.
Voor een gewoon voetpad enkel highway=footway gebruiken dus.

Verder goed bezig in Roodeschool!
user_3216889 (2017-06-04 11:56:02+00:00): Sidewalk door mij verwijderd.
chillly (2017-05-30 18:35:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM

I see you've deleted your work. Do you need any help?
vfadia (2017-05-30 19:03:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for offer of your help. I did my first edit to add 2 houses (with separate garages) on the street and uploaded them in one go. However, it seemed the standard layer was showing up as odd shape.

Can I make multiple edits and upload once? Will OSM show them with individual boundaries or just a one big asset?

Thanks.
V Fadia
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:55+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 06:03:33+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 07:09:54+00:00): Ook hier heb je (per ongeluk) het gehele adres verwijderd, ik heb het aangepast. Het adres bestaat namelijk nog.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2502816766
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 07:02:13+00:00): Per ongeluk heb je bij deze verhuizing de gehele node verplaatst.
De node bestaat uit meer dan alleen gegevens van het bedrijf. Het bevat namelijk ook adresgegevens. Dit adres bestaat nog steeds, maar nu helaas niet meer in OSM.
Ik heb de changeset teruggedraaid, en aangepast.
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 06:11:46+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2991188225
Inmiddels heb ik shop=yes omgezet naar shop=supermarket
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=supermarket
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 06:38:49+00:00): Je hebt (per ongeluk) de gehele adresnode verwijderd. Als Roeke Ruitersport is gestopt met haar activiteiten blijft normaal gesproken het adres bestaan. (Of is het pand gesloopt?)
Inmiddels heb ik de adresnode teruggeplaatst.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2502815643
michalgt86 (2017-06-01 10:01:37+00:00): Mam pytanie, czy tor kolejowy http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313121362 jeszcze istnieję? jak istnieje to czy jest używany?.
chachafish (2018-05-24 11:40:29+00:00): Howdy :) I'm reviewing some OSM Inspector-tagged errors. In this changeset there are numerous houses addressed as being on, "E Indian Creek Drive", and "W Indian Creek Drive." The abbreviated street name means these houses are not connected to the street they are on. Could you revisit this and make changes? Cheers! :)
Corban8 (2018-05-24 17:47:20+00:00): I went ahead and made the changes to those names. I appreciate you letting me know. I did building footprint import from the Mesa County database and the houses had the abbreviated name version on them. I'll look and see if I can find any more issues like this from the imports we did. Thank you.
chachafish (2018-05-24 18:27:47+00:00): Thanks for the quick response :) As you can see in the link below, the Grand Junction area has many hundreds of errors. I'll clean up what I can. I might get back to you if I find more for you. I won't ask you to clean up anything you didn't create. Cheers! :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-108.34913&lat=39.10310&zoom=10&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 06:32:02+00:00): Het toevoegen van FttH PoP centrales is een voorstel in de wiki, toch vind ik dat de tags geplaatst kunnen worden. Inmiddels heb ik de 2 PoP centrales aangevuld.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4008872680
Hier kun je lezen hoe het voorstel eruit ziet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-05-30 20:46:07+00:00): Per cortesia, smetti di fare danni gratuiti. Stiamo cancellando i tuoi danni tornando alla versione dei oggetti che hai modificato, tuttavia è una scocciatura.
Cascafico (2017-05-30 21:19:46+00:00): reverted
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:51+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-05-30 20:18:30+00:00): Please, stop vandalism
Cascafico (2017-05-30 21:19:15+00:00): reverted
Allroads (2017-05-31 20:11:36+00:00): Revert toegepast van hele changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49145807

Kijk jij even bij Lindenhorst
yaugenka (2017-09-26 20:55:37+00:00): Здравствуйте! Скажите, а зачем удалил тег place из этого нп?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307562304
yaugenka (2017-09-26 21:18:55+00:00): и не только в этом нп вижу.
julesreid (2017-07-09 20:57:28+00:00): Any particular reason why the residential areas were deleted?  The two areas are predominantly residential, even if there are places like Manoa Valley Inn which are commercial businesses.
cbaze (2017-07-10 18:21:40+00:00): Because the boundaries of them were arbitrary. According to the C&C Honolulu LUO, the whole area including UH & Punahou are a "residential area". Why not follow their boundaries?
julesreid (2017-07-12 09:48:08+00:00): I took a look at the C&C web site at http://honolulugis.org/ and the boundaries you are talking about are pretty large, more than could be input during a single OSM editing session.  The areas I marked as residential were within the C&C residential zones, so I don't see why that is arbitrary.  One of the things I like about OSM is the opportunity to fill in any of the many empty areas that still exist on the map.  I'd rather add information in pieces than have to have it entirely accurate on the first edit.
cbaze (2017-07-13 00:45:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential states "The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use". If the boundaries are large, they should be drawn that way. A bunch of small residential areas with arbitrary boarders is only going to make the map more cluttered and confusing. The edge of the boundary should be the edge of residential use, the edge of a neighborhood, or something that isn't just adjacent to more residential use. Arbitrary is defined as "based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system". Adding a bunch of patchwork residential areas with random borders don't add any value to OSM.
user_8466505 (2020-10-15 01:34:23+00:00): Oof. I'll contact the Data Working Group on this.
RoterEmil (2017-05-31 06:59:46+00:00): Hallo M_Kucha, auch in diesem CS hast Du PLZ den Adressen hinzugefügt, die offenbar nicht stimmen. Ich habe das teilweise bereits korrigiert, wo es eindeutig ist (Heiliger Weg 55-63, 75a). Was ist mit der 60g? Ist das von Dir entsprechend eingetragene Gebäude tatsächlich die 60g (während die 60 nördlich der Bahngleise liegt)?
Im übrigen ist OSM ein gemeinschaftliches Werk, wo Kommunikation in manchen Fällen nötig ist. Es wäre deshalb schön, wenn Du auf freundliche Nachfragen auch entsprechend reagierst. Danke und schöne Grüße
MicDK (2017-05-31 20:42:01+00:00): Der findes ikke en café, der hedder Ølands Køkken på adressen Frederiksgade. Derfor har jeg tidligere flyttet den til at ligge inde i Fremtidsfabrikken, Frederiksgade 8, Svendborg.

Nu har du så atter tegnet Ølands Køkken ind på adressen Frederiksgade 6 (inde i Crazy Daisy). Den placering er stadig forkert og bedes derfor slettet.

Dokumentation for at Csfé Øland ligger inde i Fremtidsfabrikken kan ses her: http://www.fremtidsfabrikken.com/168-%C3%B8landscaf%C3%A9.html

Med venlig hilsen
MicDK
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-06-01 07:37:01+00:00): Tak, har merged og beholds positionen i nr 8.

Fødevarestyrelsen har den forkerte adresse.

http://www.findsmiley.dk/696832
ff5722 (2017-05-30 20:35:25+00:00): I accidentally reverted changeset #48561075 in the same layer, the rest of it is all around 武强县.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49114478
Glassman (2017-05-30 22:04:37+00:00): You might want to add a tag to describe the business, for example office=marketing. There is a full list of tags at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office
odddogmedia (2017-05-30 22:25:47+00:00): Thanks @glassman, we made that update along with a few others.
TheBestIdea (2017-12-14 16:01:31+00:00): Is there really no right turn from s/b 3rd Ave to 13th Street?
eggie (2018-03-27 06:53:07+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
carciofo (2017-06-06 09:27:29+00:00): I'm reverting the leisure=park tag for relation 7233208 as no such park exists. Since there's been no response in the discussion of changeset 48850559, I can only assume this to be a case of mapping for the renderer. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark for information about the park tag, and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
gileri (2017-06-14 21:29:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Ici aussi width=-2 signifie "moins de deux mètres de large" ?
xrt (2017-06-17 05:51:40+00:00): Voilà, j'ai mis à 2 mètres. J'ai corrigé aussi le nombre de marches qui était en négatif. Je me pose d'autres questions, si je peux me permettre. Je voudrai avoir un GPS. Il parait qu'il y en a à 50€ environ, qu'on peut acheter par OSM. Mais je ne sais quel modèle choisir, ni comment m'y prendre. Y-a-t'il un forum de discussions ? Merci pour votre engagement à Osm, pour avoir une belle carte
gileri (2017-06-19 21:05:27+00:00): Merci pour les compliments, ça fait vraiment plaisir !

Merci à vous aussi de contribuer de manière aussi précise et de discuter sur les modifications, c'est plutôt rare en général.

Concernant le GPS, je réponds en message privé.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-05-31 20:37:39+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
RicoElectrico (2017-06-16 18:39:02+00:00): Fixing a park that is clearly a PoGo vandalism?
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:48+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
andygol (2017-05-31 08:55:26+00:00): Кириле, не треба підписувати гаражі як "name=Гаражи". Замість цього потрібно вкзати ту назву яка є для цього об'єкта. Якщо назви немає не треба нічого додавати. Почитайте будь ласка - ["Name - тільки для назв"](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8#Name.C2.A0.E2.80.94_.D1.82.D1.96.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.B8_.D0.B4.D0.BB.D1.8F_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2).

P&G краще змінити з "landuse=industrial" на "man_made=works" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dworks). Виправте ці неточності.
Якщо у вас є ще питання - звертайтесь, спробую допомогти.

Andygol
andygol (2017-05-31 09:05:06+00:00): Також, не треба дублювати об'єкти. Тут мова  про "Олександрівську збагачувальну фабрику", яку позначено і точкою і лінією. Точка тут зайва, її треба вилучити.

Ще одне зауваження, щодо назв. Назви вулиць (теґ name) треба писати українською та додавати також теґ name:uk=<назва українською з теґу name>, назви іншими мовами додаються до відповідних теґів name:xx=* (більш докладно про це див https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Назви)
user_3022894 (2018-12-12 21:35:55+00:00): Hi ohligser,
Frage unter anderem zu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115149346 - auf einem footway kann bicycle aber nicht "designated" sein - sind das für Radfahrer freigegebene Fußwege? Dann würde ich den bicycle-Wert zu "yes" ändern...
Viele Grüße, Lukas
ohligser (2018-12-12 22:11:05+00:00): Hallo Lukas458,
genauso ist es gemeint: Eher Fuß- als Radweg (weil Bürgersteig -- ok subjektive Meinung), aber als Radweg benutzbar oder sogar verpflichtend.
"designated" wird als höherwertiger (und präziser) empfunden als "yes".
"official" verstehe ich als noch konkreter, sei aber umstritten.
Hab mir das nicht ausgedacht, sondern ist hier so empfohlen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Gruß ohligser
user_3022894 (2018-12-13 17:59:23+00:00): Hmm okay, verstehe schon, was du meinst. Die Frage ist halt, ob da ein blaues Schild steht, in dem ein Fahrrad ist. Nur dann wäre es für mich bicycle=designated. Naja gut, designated heißt auch wieder nicht "Benutzungspflicht" sondern nur "vorgesehen", hmm. Naja irgendwie steht das auf jeder Seite wieder anders. Ich denke mal ich sehe meine Frage dann insofern als beantwortet an, da das Radwegtagging ja ohnehin in diverse Möglichkeiten aufgeteilt ist. Danke für den Link.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
Noen (2017-06-03 14:05:42+00:00): Hvis dette faktisk er en hundepark burde den også omtagges til "leisure=dog_park".
Tractor (2017-06-05 04:46:33+00:00): Ja, det er en hundepark. <https://www.oslo.kommune.no/natur-kultur-og-fritid/tur-og-friluftsliv/parker-og-friomrader/skraperudtjern-friomrade-for-hund/>. Jeg har nå delt området i to deler: en for hundeparken (tagget "leisure=dog_park") og en for den vanlige parken.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:45+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 10:32:47+00:00): Ik heb wat aanvullende tags op je bankje geplaatst.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4886630470
German C (2017-07-10 13:10:14+00:00): Los nodos que se han colocado no pertencen a un sitio, esta a puntando a un area forestal, es municipio se llama es Aratoca no Zapatoca
German C (2017-07-10 13:11:22+00:00): Este municipio no es Zapatoca, el nombre correcto es Aratoca, no se deberían mezclar dos tipos de nodos (Sitio y Lugar de culto).
Commodoortje (2017-05-31 09:54:47+00:00): Je tekent hier een garage in een gebouw, in de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) zal het gebouw uit 1 pand bestaan. Je hebt nu (per ongeluk) een gebouw in een gebouw getekend. 
Zou je hier naar willen kijken?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497029005
marc__marc (2022-08-25 22:22:24+00:00): Hello,
I can't find the name of the street "Jianguo Zhong Lu" there.
can you check please ?
Regards,
Marc
Carlos Brys (2017-10-30 21:18:11+00:00): En el cajero se indica como nombre la red, ej: Banelco, y en el operador el nombre del banco
=Andy= (2017-05-31 01:36:18+00:00): Natürlich keine Badeanstalt...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-01-28 11:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55826946 where the changeset comment is: Revert spam links to a shop
poornibadrinath (2017-06-01 05:12:11+00:00): Hi Aquger,
 Can you please confirm why the building on the right side of the school was deleted? it is seen in all the imageries.
Aquger (2017-06-01 22:57:29+00:00): Hi poornibadrinath,
the separate buildings on the left side were demolished.
On the right side I have deleted nothing
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:42+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
geoaria (2017-11-07 14:35:19+00:00): روش رسم ساختمان های مسکونی شما اشتباه می باشد ، رسم ساختمان فقط باید در محیط همان ساختمان مسکونی باشد و نه چندین ساختمان با هم
mapovis (2017-05-31 02:28:41+00:00): You can review an official government document, with George Street marked in pink, at this link - http://www.evernote.com/shard/s404/sh/f555114f-c852-4f98-886c-b331ada1081d/d999f0ff4b02f1773484ca32019296a6
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-30 21:31:49+00:00): Hi, wbutc1005. I think the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/497045180) isn't correct. So, I modified it based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you.
sabas88 (2017-05-31 06:55:55+00:00): Hi,
you traced the pool both as a point and as an area, could you merge them?
Johnny Carlsen (2019-06-18 15:23:26+00:00): A lot of these names does not sound like normal road names, are they correct? and where do they come from?
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-15 05:32:46+00:00): Hi, wbutc1005. I think some part of this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/497053346) isn't correct. So, I modified it based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-11-12 03:23:37+00:00): Hi wbutc1005
I think some part of this highway (way 497053359) is not correct. So I've modified it based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-03-15 00:20:48+00:00): Hi, this node I have split your added way in 2017 right on this node https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7874451489. I could nit find any clue how this way connected to the way accros the river. Have a look if you found my modified edit is not appropriate.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:04+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
CloCkWeRX (2017-05-31 03:59:27+00:00): Does it need some kind of theme park tagging?
KNAPPO (2017-05-31 04:05:22+00:00): Ive just added the name "Waterworld" to the building as it seemed the most appropriate place for a name marker.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-09-30 02:16:02+00:00): hi wbutc1005, 
I've adjusted the highway's (way 497057302) geometry based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
thank you
TheDutchMan13 (2020-07-17 22:49:27+00:00): Not sure why you added building on top of buildings?
pezizomycotina (2020-07-17 23:51:30+00:00): I must have saved these buildings twice in JOSM without realizing. You can delete this changeset.
TheDutchMan13 (2020-07-20 07:32:16+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. I'll be working on cleaning it up right now.
poornibadrinath (2017-06-01 05:08:12+00:00): Hi Labudda,
 I came across your edits and noticed you deleted a couple of amenities. Is there any reason why these were deleted? The changeset comment doesn't mention anything clearly. Can you please mention why these were deleted? 
Thanks,
Poornima
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-06-07 11:28:11+00:00): Hi,
das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"?

Gruss, Jan
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:37:01+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Arma IRM-ED (2020-11-25 08:53:06+00:00): Hi, wbutc1005. I think this tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/497064032) wasn't correct. So, I changed it into unclassified road. Please let me know if I'm wrong. Thank you
Arma IRM-ED (2020-11-25 07:28:30+00:00): Hi, wbutc1005. I think this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/497066431) wasn't tertiary road so I changed it into residential road
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:36:59+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
km2bp (2017-05-31 04:59:45+00:00): Dobra robota !
rowers2 (2017-11-07 18:01:05+00:00): Już nie pamietam czego dotyczył revert i czy ty prosiłeś ale odzywam sie aby zznaczyć soje zaskoczenie ze w grupie napastliwych komentarzy warto zauważyć jakiś życzliwy.
Życzę zadowolenia z mapowania i liczę na współpracę.Na OSM brakuje pozytywnej energii dlatego tak szybko ludzie odchodzą.