piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geosmalley (2019-10-28 16:50:00+00:00): I think the round object might be an umbrella. 
nice job squaring your buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76073385
Glassman (2019-10-23 02:04:46+00:00): It doesn't look like any of our imagery shows the parking lot. That is a shame. Thank you for the updates. Let me know if you need any help editing OSM. I'm not far away - Mount Vernon. 

I sent you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76073389
jlat1990 (2019-10-23 02:11:08+00:00): Thank you for your quick response.  Over the summer Island County Parks and Recreation has made significant changes to this particular park. Current satellite imagery does not yet reflect these changes. Since you are so close, I would be more than willing to give you a tour pf the new grounds and the changes I made to the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76073389
Glassman (2019-10-23 02:13:34+00:00): Tip: Select the building outline then just type a "q" to square them. They'll look much nicer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76073799
viloan (2019-10-23 01:23:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-10-26 09:41:31+00:00): Hi,
please check the names on this road - which one of the three is right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507836853
nickmettauer (2019-10-28 22:59:01+00:00): My mistake, "Rua Rio Parnauba" wasn't supposed to be there. Both "Rua Rio Amazonas" and "Rua Geraldo Ferreira Rabelo" are on the IBGE layer. Thanks for pointing that out!
user_5359 (2019-10-23 03:44:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
viloan (2019-10-23 02:45:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-10-26 08:36:14+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found 19 tags like "semafaro=...". I guess you meant highway=traffic_signals, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals

Could you have a look and fix this?
user_5359 (2019-10-23 03:39:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#United_States
Marius Geitle (2019-10-23 11:35:49+00:00): Hello,

You are adding tons of buildings and amenities which which does not appear to exist on the areal photos. Many of which are in the middle of ponds, the ocean or the woods.

Could you explain why you are doing that?
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 12:25:24+00:00): Sorro i don’t understand
Marius Geitle (2019-10-23 13:09:40+00:00): In this changeset you added a node with tags craft=stand_builder. However, there is nothing other than woods at the location.

I have checked some of your other changesets as well, and you have, for example, added buildings in the middle of the ocean. 

Could you explain what you are trying to accomplish?
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 13:12:13+00:00): Sorry mistake
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 18:30:46+00:00): Mistake
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 18:32:11+00:00): Sorry mistake
Marius Geitle (2019-10-23 18:41:31+00:00): Md jins, I did notice that you did some good work when you edited through the OpenStreetMap.org website for the #youthmappersngc;#missingmap.

However, the edits you make with OsmAnd are not useful. Could you maybe stop using the OsmAnd app to edit the map, since you are apparently having problems with it?
Glassman (2019-10-23 16:56:50+00:00): I'm curious why you removed the residential landuse. They appear correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76076735
ma-rt-in (2019-10-24 06:39:01+00:00): Hallo,
bitte lösche doch nicht die alte Node, wenn du selbige nochmals erstellst. Das ist nicht zielführend! Des Weiteren ist dies zwar ein Altglassconatiner, aber für Glasfalschen und nicht allgemein Glas (vermutlich). In OSM wird da sehr unterschieden.
Ich werde es nun anpassen.
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-10-24 06:33:00+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir mit der Annahme ganz sicher?
In OSM wird eine Kraftfahrstraße durch den Tag motorroad=yes gekennzeichnet, eine mehrheitlich Kreuzungsfreie Strecke über trunk.
Generell wird in OSM die Verkehrsbedeutung einer klassifizerten STraße wiedergegeben und nicht den behördlichen Status.
vg
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:36:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6907775955/history has access:bicycle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bicycle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle ) be fitting at least equally well?
AcademicMapper (2024-02-06 08:38:31+00:00): Yes, I suppose so!
But it has been  > 4 years, so honestly I forgot how the road looked like :-)
arjunaraoc (2019-10-30 06:40:04+00:00): The following errors are thrown up about Zarugumalli  when I attempted to add wikidata today.

Intersection between multipolygon ways (4)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
Unconnected coastline (2)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]

I think Zarugumalli has two exclaves as I saw from the census document map and you seem to have mapped one only.

Let me know your feedback.
Heinz_V (2019-10-30 07:36:29+00:00): I added the enclave according to census data; Bharatmap knows only 1 enclave.
I controll the errors later.
gileri (2019-10-23 19:35:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour indiquer l'acceptation des titres restaurants il y a le tag payment:meal_voucher qui est fait pour :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:payment#Divers
Ludovic Drouard (2019-10-24 06:00:00+00:00): Bien vu !
C'est corrigé
user_5359 (2019-10-23 07:41:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you add a disused:building you should delete building too
kylezoa (2019-10-23 17:03:08+00:00): Hi, sounds good. I was unsure if it should be deleted.
user_5359 (2019-10-23 17:06:52+00:00): If a building has just been demolished (and the aerial photographs are old), then you should leave the way as a warning so that a house is not accidentally drawn from the old aerial photograph. If the new house is entered, the old outline can be deleted.
kylezoa (2019-10-23 17:15:10+00:00): Understood, thank you.
Hjart (2019-10-23 08:15:09+00:00): What's your source for this change?
fukejs (2019-10-23 08:27:10+00:00): User of our Mapy.cz application reported this, but was not able to change it himself. It seemed trustworthy.
Hjart (2019-10-23 08:32:46+00:00): I would consider https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3185321399 more trustworthy, because it was imported from official government data.
Hjart (2019-10-23 08:37:38+00:00): Ok, apparently there's something to it: https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/rene-dif-gade-og-benny-andersens-boldgade-oestermarie-er-ligeglad-med-navneregler
osmviborg (2019-10-23 09:00:16+00:00): http://tidende.dk/?Id=92684
iWowik (2019-11-23 21:48:15+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте!
Я заметил, что вы домам ставите номера, а их обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
user_5359 (2019-10-23 12:48:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Kalaraj (2019-11-05 06:46:27+00:00): Thank you for your updates on OSZM. Please add tags to the features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76083993
PT-53 (2019-10-23 15:12:26+00:00): Hallo Arne,
welche Straße meinst Du mit Hauptverkehrsstraße und was verstehst Du unter Hauptverkehrsstraße?
Fragende Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-10-24 12:14:55+00:00): Highway = Primary auf
Linie: Eiskellerstraße (156411673)
die durch einen Dorf geht ist mir nicht bekannt aber wen es eine Bundestrasse ist dann okay aber es sah aus wie eine normale Straße
PT-53 (2019-10-24 14:14:40+00:00): Hallo Arne, 
ja, das ist eine Bundesstraße und von der Verkehrsbedeutung mit primary auch korrekt in OSM klassifiziert.
PS. Bitte liefere doch künftig jeweils einen Link zu dem entspr. OSM-Objekt mit. Dazu rechts das Fragezeichen anklicken und anschließend das entspr. OSM-Objekt. Danach in der erscheinenden Such-Ergebnisliste auf der linken Seite das richtige Objekt auswählen und anschließend die URL kopieren und im Kommentar einfügen.
Grüße
termanton (2019-10-23 07:23:29+00:00): Я хорош
Pechenko Anastasiya (2019-10-23 07:26:11+00:00): Ты хорош
abakus_uploader (2019-10-23 22:30:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2019-10-26 08:33:25+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a new tag here, 
'payment:self_checkout'.
On the other hand, the tag 'self_checkout' is already used 50 times and has an entry in the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:self_checkout

Would you mind changing that?

Jan
CjMalone (2019-10-26 11:22:22+00:00): Hey, I followed a proposed spec, but I will swap for the in use one.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/payment:self_checkout
mueschel (2019-10-26 15:19:36+00:00): Proposals and actual tagging practice... not the only place where they are different. 
I put a remark on the discussion page of the proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/payment:self_checkout
GerdP (2023-01-07 08:18:04+00:00): Moin!
Ich wundere mich gerade über die maxspeed=50, z.B. an https://www.osm.org/way/141063752.
Ich bin da gestern lang geradelt und hatte die ohne besondere Begrenzung in Erinnerung. Auch auf meinen Fotos finde ich keine Tempo 50 Schilder. Da die Straßen ausserhalb geschlossener Ortschaften liegen, sollte da doch 100 gelten, oder?
GerdP (2024-04-24 09:40:39+00:00): Auch bei dem Sandbergweg https://www.osm.org/way/39990798 habe ich kein Tempo50 Schild gesehen. Hast Du Dir die maxspeed Werte einfach ausgedacht?
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 18:30:10+00:00): Whu did you add this?
ff5722 (2019-10-24 19:45:46+00:00): I will notify DWG because there are many similar incorrect changesets by this user.
marczoutendijk (2019-10-24 19:50:16+00:00): That is not necessary ff5722 because I'm a member of the DWG and was already informed by other users! Thank you for your offer.
Md jins has contacted me and we are trying to get rid of all his "mistakes".
Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ff5722 (2019-10-24 19:50:44+00:00): Ok seems like the recent changesets are actually legit, so I will revert just the bad changesets
ff5722 (2019-10-24 19:51:13+00:00): Alright I will let you handle it then!
marczoutendijk (2019-10-24 19:52:35+00:00): Thank you for doing that. Indeed al his early changesets seem to contain many faulty edits.
mueschel (2019-10-27 10:01:03+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "record=yes" on several hospitals. Was this a mistake?

Jan
R2_tejan (2019-11-04 03:27:32+00:00): Hi Mueschel,

Hope you are doing great!

Thank you so much for bringing into notice and Its a accidental tag from the Govt dataset and I have fixed the same.
 
Thank you again :)

-Tejan
user_5359 (2019-10-23 12:00:16+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Habene die Hydranten tatsächlich den Namen "OH Feuerwehr Forstern" oder ist mahr eine Referenz (ref) auf den Standort?
user_5359 (2019-10-23 18:10:15+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), over (usually one node, but can also be different ways). Please check all not deleted relations.
shadty (2019-10-24 07:27:27+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have removed the relations in the changeset 76137167.

Thanks,
shadty
Fritz Fredl (2019-10-23 08:16:48+00:00): Warum wird der Kulmer Hütten Weg strichliert dargestellt und der Feichterweg durgezogen, obwohl beide Wege die selben Eigenschaften haben?
Luzandro (2019-10-23 16:55:12+00:00): Hallo Fritz,

der Kulmer Hütten Weg war offenbar noch nicht neu gerendert, oder du hast Ergebnisse aus dem Cache bekommen.

Die Eigenschaften können aber in beiden Fällen nicht ganz stimmen, da sowohl tracktype=grade1 (=befestigt) als auch surface=unpaved (=unbefestigt) angegeben ist, was sich widerspricht. 

Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface

LG Andreas
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 19:16:10+00:00): On behalf of the DWG I ask you to stop adding this nonsense information to OSM.
Please report to me what you are trying to do.

Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 19:53:13+00:00): I didn't understand at first so I had this kind of problem ,,, I'm sorry and I won't be wrong
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 19:55:15+00:00): From now on I will act cautiously
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 19:58:37+00:00): Thanks a lot...
marczoutendijk (2019-10-24 06:18:01+00:00): I also sent a mail to your OSM account mailbox. Did you check that?

And you should fix all the mistakes you made!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Mahmud06 (2019-10-24 07:39:21+00:00): I'm a new member  So I didn't understand .... I'm sorry
MKnight (2019-10-23 12:47:35+00:00): you have deleted a lot of buildings here, why?
Thibaultmol (2019-10-23 15:57:48+00:00): Please make your changeset a smaller region, this makes it many times harder to review...
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-10-24 04:14:09+00:00): Вандализм.
Правка удалена.
Marc_ch (2019-11-20 23:31:25+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez créée un chemin en double
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737809312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737809313
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2019-11-27 23:07:41+00:00): J'ai fais le correctif
Константин Гам (2020-04-20 13:10:20+00:00): Не надо вносить камеры по данным гибдд рф, из 10 камер, реальная одна...
user_5359 (2019-10-23 12:09:05+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Für eine bessere Beschreibung Deiner Objekte lies Dir die Seiten https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:door durch. Wenn ein Wert zur Beschreibung nicht ausreicht, verwenden wir das Semikolon statt einen Schrägstrich als Trennzeichen.
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 18:29:10+00:00): why did you add this?
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 18:35:35+00:00): Send me ur contact number
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 18:38:31+00:00): I'm asking you to clarify your additions to OSM, as they don't seem to make much sense.
Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 18:27:55+00:00): Why did you add this at this spot?
Mahmud06 (2019-10-23 18:43:18+00:00): Plz send me ur imu contact number
marczoutendijk (2019-10-23 18:47:49+00:00): I'm contacting you on behalf of the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap foundation.
Your addition of a Craft stand builder in the middle of the sea doesn't make any sense.
Please tell us what you are trying to add.

Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2019-10-23 12:22:26+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte markiere nicht das ganze Gelände als Gebäude sondern ausschließlich die Gebäude.
maxbe (2019-10-31 17:17:40+00:00): Darf man da inzwischen Fahrrad fahren? Ich erinnere mich an ein VZ 239 "Gehweg" mit Zusatz "Privatweg" oder so ähnlich... 

Ich weiss, dass die Stadt in ihren Plänen ( http://maps.muenchen.de/rgu/radlstadtplan ) das als Radweg bezeichnet, aber Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in Sachen "lückenloses Radwegenetz" und Realität weichen halt gelegentlich voneinander ab ;)
miche101 (2019-11-01 10:20:50+00:00): Hallo, es ist vor Ort nur das Fußgänger Verkehrszeichen, aber kein Fahrrad Verbotszeichen.

Also ist Highway path mit foot designated richtig und ausreichend..
PT-53 (2019-11-01 10:58:05+00:00): Hallo,
das Fußgängerverkehrszeichen # 239
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=239
ist doch ein Gebot für Fußgänger und gleichzeitig ein Verbot für alle anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer, also auch Fahrräder.
Oder, liege ich da falsch?
miche101 (2019-11-01 11:05:49+00:00): Ja sehr ich auch so..  so ist es jetzt auch getaggt.
PT-53 (2019-11-01 12:49:34+00:00): Nein, das stmmt nicht.
Mit der Klassifizierung als path ist Radfahren automatisch erlaubt.  Das ist ein Widerspruch zu dem Verkehrszeichen # 239.
miche101 (2019-11-01 18:54:33+00:00): Ja aber dein osmtools.de und das Wiki sagen dass nicht... Mal so an Rande
PT-53 (2019-11-01 19:25:54+00:00): Kennst Du
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany ?
PT-53 (2019-11-01 19:28:32+00:00): PS: "Mein OSM-Tool" gibt für Verkehrszeichen # 239  "footway" und nicht path als Wege-Klassifikation an!
Den Unterschied kannst Du hier erkennen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
miche101 (2019-11-02 08:49:39+00:00): Ja dann muss hab den Highway Tag noch ändern.. das es passt.. aus footway
stephankn (2020-06-14 17:54:31+00:00): please do not leave private notes. This is a public map database.
Sara Iglesias (2019-10-23 08:48:14+00:00): Mapa colaborativo Educación Primaria 2019/2020
XtFbHm2W (2019-10-24 03:53:46+00:00): Hi KingNorman, congrats on creating your first contributions to OSM! Here are a few pieces of advice regarding the path between both blocks:
-Use the tag 'name' when it is the official name of a feature. In this case you have used it to describe the path, which is not the intended use of this tag.
-Similarly, the tag 'note' is used to communicate with other mappers and assist their task. In this case, there is no need to describe the park, although there is the tag 'description' which fits this purpose. I suggest that you add the 'leisure=fitness_station' that you mention  as nodes instead.
- Path is a valid tag, but if it primarily is a footpath, then it is better to tag it as 'highway=footpath' and 'bicycle=yes'. 'Foot=yes' becomes redundant in that case.
-In general, paths should connect to other ways unless they really are isolated. In this case, if there is a void deck you could create a corridor through it and then another path leading to the car park. I believe the ID editor should warn you when this happens.

I encourage you to keep mapping and to read on the OSM wiki, which is a great resource to learn: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
viloan (2019-10-23 08:59:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CARLAVP99 (2020-01-13 11:09:26+00:00): Se trata de un recinto cerrado, cubierto y acondicionado para mantener una temperatura regular que proteja las plantas de las inclemencias extremas propias del tiempo invernal, como frío intenso, heladas, viento, etc..
mbethke (2019-10-24 15:26:57+00:00): Oh, you fixed it already. Top :)
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-10-23 12:32:33+00:00): Justifique o motivo para ter alterado a localização oficial do Caniço. É a última vez que lhe peço para que justifique.
Jomicoga (2019-10-23 15:01:12+00:00): Peço desculpa pelo incómodo que lhe estou a causar. Julguei estar a alterar a localização da Junta da freguesia, sendo minha intenção pôr o ponto na entrada da mesma. Entretanto dei conta que dá para adicionar entradas e saídas como pontos.
ma-rt-in (2019-10-24 06:24:01+00:00): Hallo,
Nachfrage zu Node 2387057210: Was ist der Hintergrund zur fixme?
vg