piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2019-07-20 08:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72454090 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user TSffb with comments containing &quot;Fahrradstra&quot;. The user retagged lots of bicycle roads as cycleways but it seems that most of these changes are just wrong and don't match the reality.
Nakaner (2019-07-20 07:53:51+00:00): Hallo,

wenn es ein verkehrsberuhigter Bereich (Verkehrszeichen Nr. 325/1, 325/2) ist, ist bicycle=designated falsch. In OSM erfassen wir nur vor Ort überprüfbare Fakten, keine Wertungen/subjektives Empfinden. Fahrradrouten (grün-weiße bzw. rot-weiße Wegweiser) erfassen wir als Routenrelationen oder an den Ways mit dem Tag lcn=yes.

Wie ist denn die Hans-Sachs-Str. vor Ort beschildert?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68804545
trigpoint (2019-04-03 11:22:28+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. You have added this service road through an existing building and commercial area. Please slow down and take your time editing, mapping is not a race. Often when adding new objects we need to tweak and improve existing objects.
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2019-04-04 13:01:33+00:00): Hi Phil,
Thanks for looking into the edit. Generally these type of errors wont happen. The editor might have turned off the building feature by mistake. We had a connect with the editor and explained it. We have edited the building feature as per the Bing Aerial imagery.

Do let us know if there are any other issues from our end.We are looking forward to collaborate with the local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
yaswap.
Nakaner-repair (2019-07-20 08:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72454090 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user TSffb with comments containing &quot;Fahrradstra&quot;. The user retagged lots of bicycle roads as cycleways but it seems that most of these changes are just wrong and don't match the reality.
acet2ngaia (2019-04-02 17:44:05+00:00): Forgot to add source: aerial imagery
Myazyk (2019-04-04 19:44:30+00:00): На Самбірській так є одинакові номери у будинків і у хат. Наприклад, 100, 102, 106, 108 й інші. Не треба то виправляти на карті і вносити неправдиві дані.
Rostyslav_ua (2019-04-04 22:13:14+00:00): Ці номери в одиночному екземплярі. На днях буду біля цього будинку, уточню адресу
Rostyslav_ua (2019-04-04 22:15:28+00:00): 88 будинок також один а другий, той що біля матадору має інший номер.
Myazyk (2019-04-09 20:45:21+00:00): Не має він іншого номеру
Nakaner (2019-07-20 07:59:45+00:00): Hallo,

darf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68143867 nicht mehr von Fußgängern benutzt werden?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68805053
mcld (2019-04-02 18:09:02+00:00): Hi - please do NOT map buildings when you're doing the roads task! (Roads task is #5874, buildings is #5875) Sorry but there's an editing clash, doubled-mappings of the same building
Nakaner-repair (2019-07-20 08:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72454090 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user TSffb with comments containing &quot;Fahrradstra&quot;. The user retagged lots of bicycle roads as cycleways but it seems that most of these changes are just wrong and don't match the reality.
mmahmud (2022-02-06 06:44:03+00:00): Hi, can you confirm the case of "EP LWINI"? OSMOSE is showing it as an issue as the name should be perhaps "Ep Lwini". Also, does EP stands for "École Polytechnique"?
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-08-12 19:17:21+00:00): Do not change road hierarchy at random.
Baconcrisp (2023-08-14 14:16:30+00:00): I wasn't changing hierarchy at random. I was using the available satellite imagery to determine each roads function according to the guidelines on the OSM wiki.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 21:05:25+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
sharon in dc (2019-04-25 21:47:21+00:00): PeanutButterRemedy was there an earlier comment that I should have responded to?
sharon in dc (2019-04-25 21:51:15+00:00): Please do help me restore this addition. I am a real person, who enjoys eating at this restaurant and toys with the idea I can also contribute to OpenStreet content.

For example, it appears to me that a restaurant I passed in Paris, named Pomze, is incorrectly placed by a block. This should not stand.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-25 22:04:23+00:00): I'm so sorry sharon. This was mistakenly acted on and the comment was added, but there was nothing wrong with what you did. In fact, the Fancy Radish was never actually deleted due to a fault in my process, so there is nothing left for you or I to do to fix things. Sorry for the scare. And thanks for being active and responding to the message so quickly.
skquinn (2019-05-11 04:13:28+00:00): What I think made this show up on  PeanutButterRemedy's radar was the opening_hours tag. There is a specific syntax of this tag which unfortunately iD and Potlatch 2 do not check prior to uploading. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for details and/or note the example changes I have made to this POI.
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-03 16:20:35+00:00): Hi lukash1212, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings which have been mapped just a few hours before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68808135
cronoser (2022-05-04 20:35:29+00:00): Hola, no borres los parajes ya que son datos importados del IGN y por tanto oficiales. He revertido la edicción https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120560314
Un saludo
Øukasz (2019-04-10 19:51:16+00:00): Hi mbe57. Can you let me know please what's the source of your data to set Longana as municipality? Thanks
mbe57 (2019-04-10 20:35:18+00:00): Wikipedia is not very clear here. So, if somebody with local knowledge can take care this is very appreciated.
My interest are local province capitals. Being well aware, that "province" means different things in different places; sometimes simply use another term for it.
Øukasz (2019-04-14 19:45:40+00:00): Glad to be of help then:

Longana is not a municipality, town, villageb, or even a populated place. It is a general highland area of East Ambae. 

The capital of the Penama province has been located in Saratamata, and this is where all the offices are still located. In November 2018 however the central government has decided to move the capital to Loltong on Pentecost (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/571666803). Source: http://dailypost.vu/news/penama-chooses-loltong/article_0a9fc68c-e61a-507b-a6ef-80eca1c1beb2.html

Can you put the tags on Longana the way they were please? Thanks,

BTW: the meaning of 'province' in the context of Vanuatu is actually very clear, it's the first level admin division. There's no ambiguity or other terms I've come across.
mbe57 (2019-04-16 05:23:43+00:00): For this country, province is clear, I know.
Happy to substitute "municipality" by something more meaningful. What is the right "place" type then, pls ?
But should not "capital" be removed, too ?
And put to Saratamata?
Øukasz (2019-08-28 22:40:40+00:00): I would say place=region makes the most sense per the OSM wiki description
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-03 16:21:55+00:00): Hi Gonzalo Gómez Rey, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings which have been mapped just a few weeks before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68808595
Gonzalo Gómez Rey (2019-04-04 21:31:55+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch,

First of all thank you for your message. I do not remember exactly why I deleted this buildings, probably the reason was that I choose the wrong satellite image and consecuently I mapped the buildings that I saw.

I am so sorry, I only do this to help.
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-03 16:22:53+00:00): Hi 4MB055, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings which have been mapped just a few hours/minutes before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68809122
Mahede Hasan (2019-09-23 09:59:47+00:00): Hello appreciate your enthusiasm on drawing on OSM. Here you added a bgidge on already drawn another bridge. Can you please explain why did you do this? if you did this intentionally it count as OSM data vandalisation.

here is the location 24.04154785, 90.9980258

and please show where did you found the instraction to draw a bridg  like this.

here is a link on how to draw a bridge https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-09-23 14:05:39+00:00): শুভেচ্ছা নিন, প্রথমেই বলে নেই আমি কোনরূপ ধ্বংসাত্মক কাজের উদ্দেশ্য নিয়ে করি নাই এটি।

আপনি যেটার কথা বলছেন তা হল এটা: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681231615

এই জিনিস ইতিমধ্যে OSM-এ বহু বহু জায়গায় আছে। আমি সেই রকম অনুসরণ করেছি। কিছু দেশের থেকে কিছু উদাহরণ দিচ্ছি:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378493707
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5676410
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42922473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325369042
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707610674
ইত্যাদি ইত্যাদি। এই রকম হাজার হাজার OSM-এ রয়েছে।
Mahede Hasan (2019-09-24 07:15:11+00:00): With all due respect, you may haven't done it intentionally but it is wrong. If you check the wiki link you provided, you would see on the right side that it says that to draw a bridge you can only use a way(ie. line); not point nor polygon (that you have done). 

The examples you have given are not applicable in our country. We shouldn't assume that because they both are bridge those way of drawing is appropriate in our country. Sometime what walks like duck and quacks like duck is duck in UK but হাঁস in Bangladesh. Most of your examples are tourist attraction place and have a lower level allowing people to walk under the bridge, but we don't seem to have any in our country.  

The changes we make one OSM not only affect the visual things like tile but also other aspect of the system like location search and routing. These things impact a lot of user we are dependent on OSM on a daily basis. I can't be assured that you are one of those user, else you would know to ask before you make sudden change with zero community discussion or input. You should have taken a look at what community has done so far in this country before making a massive change like this. Here I was going to attach a few links containing the edit from a few top ranked mapper but it seems you have managed to successfully messed up all of them. A few remaining are here (PLEASE DON'T MESS WITH THIS AS WELL):

1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27918348
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24225310
3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149327908
4. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279951521
5. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309904953

I am not trying to discourage you in anyway. OSM is a open-data system which assures that we all can contribute but if we each make up our own system then the quality degrades and data with no quality is of no use. All I am requesting you that see what the community has done, ask the community before you do. Good Day!
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-09-24 14:13:28+00:00): ভাই, বাংলা লেখার ব্যবস্থা থাকলে বাংলায় লিখুন, বুঝতে সুবিধা হয়।

আপনি যেমনটা বললেন হাঁটার ব্যবস্থা, ঐ রকম এদেশের অনেকে সেতুর নিচ দিয়েও আছে। অন্তত আমি আমার গ্রামে যাওয়ার সময় দাউদকান্দির ওদিকের সেতুটার কথা বলতে পারি। 

তবে যাইহোক, ঠিকাছে আমি আর ধরব না ওগুলি।

আর ভাই, একটা অনুরোধ/প্রার্থনা, (বাংলাদেশের) মানচিত্র সম্পাদনায় সময় name অংশে বাংলা নাম দিয়েন (যদি আপনার কাছে বাংলা লেখার ব্যবস্থা থাকে) আর অন্য নাম যেমন ইংরেজি নাম name:en ঘরে দিয়েন।
Mahede Hasan (2019-09-25 10:47:14+00:00): I don't think you read my previous message properly or failed to understand it. And yes I was, am and will be using English as it the languages of the community. If we need someone else's opinion to settle our disagreement how would they do it if we continue in Bengali? For example, if someone from the OpenStreetMap Foundation want to say something would you be requesting him to write in Bengali as well?

On to your second point. So you are saying that your mentioned bridge has a different level attached to bridge where people can want relax and pass time? Like this image: http://tiny.cc/londonbridge_osmcc [URL shortened to save space and format] Apparently your mentioned bridge is also a tourist attraction just line London bridge. Do sent us the location, would love to visit the tourist place. 🙂

And my dear friend, I am REQUESTING and PRAYING, please don't no add Bengali name as name tag in Bangladesh. It makes the map unusable for us the daily user. Rather please add Bengali name as `name:bn` tag. To my knowledge, we the OpenStreetMap community in Bangladesh never knew about this policy nor agreed to use it. We in the community always add English name in `name` tag and Bengali name in `name:bn` tag. I would advice you to follow that or we would be forced to revert them.
Zabir91 (2019-10-28 18:04:52+00:00): Hi Mehedi Hasan,
Please don't remove the Bengli name from name tag. According to the

> "It makes the map unusable for us the daily"
 I use OSM as my primary map. I found no problem using it as Bangla. Rather I found it more usable. Some apps don't render properly, like OSMAnd, Also Maps.me, but it is because of the font embebed in that app. Ask the app developer to fix it.

> "To my knowledge, we the OpenStreetMap community in Bangladesh never knew about this policy nor agreed to use it."

It can be, may be because you have missed this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
From this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization

>"We in the community always add English name in `name` tag and Bengali name in `name:bn` tag. I would advice you to follow that or we would be forced to revert them."

Don't do that. You can correct others humbly if they do mistake, you are welcomed to do that. we all do mistakes. But removing/reverting because of adding local name as primary name will be Data [Vandalism](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism)

Thanks.
shaikh solaiman (2019-11-09 16:15:19+00:00): Hi there @Zabir91

I use OSM as my primary map. I found no problem using it as Bangla. Rather I found it more usable.


This is very nice to know that you are using OSM as your primary map. What I would like to know is your use case, meaning how and for what do you use OSM? Do you use it to search places, navigate from point A to point B? And what app or site do you use to do this?

Some apps don't render properly, like OSMAnd, Also Maps.me, but it is because of the font embebed in that app. Ask the app developer to fix it.


OSMAnd, Maps.me and many others doesn't render Bengali and asking the developer to do that is the most sensible call. But people who don't read Bengali but want to use the maps for Bangladesh like diplomats, foreign visitors, what should they do? Learn Bengali? You haven't even put the name:en tags on those places and in someplace the name:en tags are removed all together. Do you think that is sensible?

It can be, may be because you have missed this:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
From this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization

Yes we have missed it. The first link says that name should have Bangla name and name:en should have English name. What you missed in this link that the edit was made by Aftab at 19:55, 28 May 2019‎. Nobody from the OSMBDF or BHOOT knows him so he doesn't represents the community in Bangladesh. No discussing in this topic was made so a edit in Wiki doesn't make that a 'policy'. The second link is about name Localization not about what should be on name tag. The first line says 'By now the majority of rendering systems can deal with unicode characters, so you can use the local script for the default name tag. There is no need to use the Latin script.' but for us it is not true, is it?

By the way, we are staring a discussion (which, if I may note, the community you are referring to has failed) about the topic in [talk-bd](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-bd) mailing list with the thread title [Discussion: Issues with name localization for Bangladesh](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-bd/2019-November/000151.html). You are welcome to participate and give your opinion there.
andrewwiseman (2019-04-21 13:35:31+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Primary roads are the major roads in the country, this should probably be more like a minor/unclassified or at most tertiary. Make sure to read about road classifications
Zabir91 (2019-05-08 07:16:43+00:00): you removed the English name.please keep it while adding bangle name.
example:
name:=আলগী 
name:bn=আলগী 
name:en=Algi
stevea (2019-05-01 22:04:58+00:00): I don't doubt these are bicycle routes.  However, they might be "private" routes, it looks like ADC (ADCT?) publishes them, perhaps under copyright.  If so, you'd need permission and/or a clear ODbL (OSM's license) grant to enter the route data, unless you road them yourself (e.g. capturing GPX tracks on a GPS).

Also, the one that is tagged network=ncn is not correct.  ncn is reserved for USBRs (national, public routes in the USBRS; see our wiki).  I'm not sure if these do fit into a network, as those are usually public (national, state/regional, local means county or city) because private routes like these aren't signed.  (In rare cases, they might be, like mtn bike routes on an expansive campground area, or numbered routes in a big office park like a movie studio).

Please see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/United_States/Bicycle_Networks where at most, such route networks are lcn (local cycleway network).  The rcn are for state routes (in USA) and ncn for USBRS.  But I think that the network=* tags on these need to be edited, I'm not sure how exactly without knowing more about the network (public, private...).

Happy to share with you what I know about this, please reply with any questions you may have.  Thanks.
stevea (2019-05-01 22:05:27+00:00): Of course, "rode" them yourself.  Almost a pun!
jwbrett (2019-05-02 14:06:35+00:00): Understand and I appreciate links to the information.  I'll remove the network tag and actually,  the relation in total.
stevea (2019-05-02 16:20:50+00:00): The map and I appreciate it.  Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-03 16:25:47+00:00): Hi Stefano_M, welcome to OSM.

I think you should check your utilized tags for indoor mapping. For me it does not look right. Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-03 19:28:04+00:00): Sorry, Stefano_M.
You can ignore my comment.
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-05 22:30:36+00:00): Notiz: Zum gelöschten Briefkasten an der Waldstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1096190260 : "Briefkasten existiert nicht." siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1731581
fisher@blackrock (2019-04-02 20:15:48+00:00): #blackrockseattle19
Jbah (2019-04-02 20:05:31+00:00): *since it's only a single perpendicular "row"
aceman444 (2019-04-05 15:52:10+00:00): Zdravim, co prosim ma symbolizovat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681243390 ? Tam medzi chodnikom a budovou ziadna cesta nie je.
dusoft (2019-04-05 17:24:10+00:00): neviem, cetsu som nepridaval, pridaval som priznak.
aceman444 (2019-04-05 22:07:56+00:00): Super, tak ju mozem vymazat.
Ten priznak bicycle=yes je tiez zaujimavy. Ak je tam vyslovne dopravna znacka C8, tak sa to znaci inak, cize neviem co ste chceli povedat (len ze podla Vas tam mozu ist bicykle?). A bicycle:practical znamena co? Jedina wiki stranka o tom je po rusky a nie je to velmi pouzivane. Co znamena? A preco ste vymazali moje znacky FIXME o docasnej jednosmernosti?
aceman444 (2019-04-05 22:25:48+00:00): Lebo na normalne chodniky bicykel nesmie (bez povolujucej znacky) a na cestach automaticky ano, takze pridavat bicycle=yes tam je nadbytocne. Preto ma zaujima aka je tam dopravna znacka, ktoru ste chceli vyjadrit. Dakujem.
dusoft (2019-04-06 14:49:15+00:00): To je dobra otazka. Zacal som s bicycle=yes, ale ako pises, to v podstate len replikuje nieco, co je vyjadrene inymi tagmi. Takze som presiel na bicyle:practical, ktory je sice pouzivany iba v Litve a spol., ale kvoli tomu ho nemusime diskriminovat.

Tag pouzivam na vyznacenie tras, ktore su bicycle-friendly, aj ked neexistuju ako oficialne (alebo planovane) trasy.

Taha sa to potom z OSM inam do inych map.
aceman444 (2019-04-06 18:35:40+00:00): Co potom znamena "bicycle-friendly", ked su na tych chodnikoch bicykle zakazane? bicycle:practical teda pouzivajte ako chcete, kedze je to zatial neoficialna znacka bez dohodnuteho vyznamu. Ale tie bicycle=yes teda vsetky odstrante, kedze su klamlive. Dakujem
dusoft (2019-04-08 09:41:33+00:00): Jasne, uz som to aj poodstranoval. Bicycle-friendly = trasy, ktore su pouzitelne a odporucane pre bicykle, ale nie su oficialne znacene zvislym ci vodorovnym znacenim.
Pouzivam teda nadalej bicycle:practical, to by nemalo nikomu prekazat :-)
dusoft (2019-04-08 09:42:26+00:00): BTW, mame takyto pasport znaciek (vid vrstva vpravo)
https://mapa.cyklokoalicia.sk/pasport/public/

Ma niekto z SK OSM komunity zaujem o import?
aceman444 (2019-04-23 05:59:30+00:00): "odporucane" pre bicykle na chodniku, kde je zakonom zakazane jazdit s byciklom, mi pride ako nezmysel. To, ze si to niekde interne vediete, ako potencialnu trasu, kde by povolenie znackou v buducnosti mohlo byt udelene by bolo OK, ale nejak to zverejnovat (a "odporucat" tam jazdit verejnosti) mi pride zavadzajuce. Pouzivat na to bicycle:practical=yes mne vadit nebude, ale mozno tym Rusom, co tu znacku vymysleli, kedze vase pouzitie je v rozpore s jej popisom na wiki (prelozil som si to).

K importu.
Ak niekde je realne dopravna znacka povolujuca/prikazujuca bycikle a v OSM to nie je, urcite som za oznacenie takeho useku. Ale podla tej pasportizacie nie vsetko je spravne (napr. pontonovy mostik pri Velkom Drazdiaku podla mna ziadnu znacku nema) a podla skusenosti s v OSM neudrziavanymi "proposed" cyklotrasami od Cyklokoalicie v Petrzalke mi teda velmi nejake jednorazove naimportovanie neoveritelnych (ale realne sa tvariacich) udajov velmi prinosne nepride.
aceman444 (2019-04-25 18:40:46+00:00): Pozeral som dobre tu pasportizaciu a co prosim presne by malo byt predmetom importu? Podkladova vrstva je vyrazne zastarala, a tie farebne ciary vyzeraju byt aktualnym stavom v OSM (nie stavom aky by sa v OSM mal dosiahnut). Co je teda tam navyse, co by bolo prinosom pre OSM a zatial to tam nie je?
andrewsh (2019-04-29 18:00:12+00:00): > Pouzivat na to bicycle:practical=yes mne vadit nebude, ale mozno tym Rusom, co tu znacku vymysleli, kedze vase pouzitie je v rozpore s jej popisom na wiki (prelozil som si to).

Zrejme ten preklad nebol správny, lebo v rozpore to nie je. Je to trochu inak používane ale stále vyznám tagu je rovnaký: bicyklabilnosť.
dusoft (2019-04-29 18:01:53+00:00): Tiez som tomu tak rozumel, aj ked oni to myslia skor pre nespevnene trasy.
aceman444 (2019-04-29 18:21:33+00:00): No neviem, me to prelozilo, ze je to na cesty, ked by sa mohlo zdat, ze sa tam bicyklovat neda (lebo moze byt nespevnena cesta alebo inak fyzicky problematicka) ale v skutocnosti sa da. V Bratislave sa pouziva na cesty, kde sa zrejme (asi nikto nebude mat iny dojem) fyzicky bicyklovat da (vsetko su rozumne spevnene cesty/chodniky, ziadne baziny), ale kvoli znackam a zakonom sa tam realne neda (nesmie). Mne to pripada ako pravy opak.
Ak je ucelom pouzitia v Bratislave fyzicka "bicyklabilnost", potom mi to pride ako duplicita, nadbytocne znacenie.
andrewsh (2019-04-29 18:42:37+00:00): V Bratislave sa to používa skorej ako subjektivná bicyklabilnosť ≈ cesta je vhodná pre relatívne bezpečnú jazdu, a cyklisti túto cestu skutočne preferujú iným cestám. Čo ani neodporuje „ruskému“ významu, ani nie je duplicitné.