piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2020-05-25 07:16:23+00:00): Hallo  YukonTramp,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. dieses Reihenhaus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807619492/history
eingezeichnet
Im OSM-Inspector werden jetzt 4 Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.88626&lat=47.78905&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags

Du hast um die ganze Reihenhausanlage einen Umriß 
eingezeichent und diesen mit dem Merkmal
building=terrace
markiert. Anschließend hast Du 4 Trennlinien eingezeichnet.
Umriß:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807619492/history
Trennlinie 1:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807619488
Das ist falsch.

Wenn Du die Reihenhäuser einzeln einzeichnen willst, mußt Du auch 4 geschlossene Umriße einzeichnen. Diese sollten dann auch noch korrekt verbunden werden.
Schau Dir dazu als Beispiel mal dieses Wohnhaus und die angebauten Garagen an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653570152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653570151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653570150
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653570149

Überarbeitest Du das nochmal oder soll ich das für Dich machen?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-06-02 05:17:20+00:00): Hallo YukonTramp, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-06-04 05:04:15+00:00): Hallo YukonTramp, 
nachdem Du wiedereinmal leider nicht geantwortet bzw. reagiert hat, hbe ich heute das Gebäude überarbeitet.
Grüße
user_5359 (2020-05-24 05:10:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved  two nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the points back to the original position.
see https://www.osm.org/node/7009958665/history, https://www.osm.org/node/7003463692/history
UW Maddie (2020-06-01 06:48:54+00:00): I think way 741116310 was deleted by accident. It is very long and I can't use JOSM so user_5359 can you add it back?
OP I recommend pressing alt+W to make features invisible before moving around while zoomed very far out. Removes lag and prevents accidental node movements which I found more of.
user_5359 (2020-06-01 07:17:43+00:00): revert the whole change set.
user_5359 (2020-05-24 05:01:42+00:00): Hello! Please don’t delete private ways, if the exists. You can mark them with access=private (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) .
SK53 (2022-06-22 09:18:27+00:00): Hi,

I've updated the tags on the "gasometer". Really helpful to know it was gas pipeline. Should show up on OpenInfraMap if I've got them right.

If by chance you see pipeline markers along roadsides & fields they can be mapped too (this seems currently favoured tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:marker). They are useful for working out where pipelines run.

Cheers,

Jerry aka SK53
danieldegroot2 (2020-05-23 21:08:13+00:00): First time using JOSM \ Eerste keer dat ik JOSM gebruik.
eggie (2020-05-23 21:24:04+00:00): Dag Daniël.. 'k Zie geen vreemde zaken.
Je kunt het best de PDOK actueel als achtergrond gebruiken.  Die is het meest recent.
Verder kun je ook de transparant van de BGT op je foto kunnen zetten.
Mer info daarover vind je hier.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021

Succes,
Eggie
chachafish (2020-05-23 22:08:33+00:00): Hello. Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your edits in Denver on the N-Line rail and the N-Line rail bridge are a little problematic. Ways need to be attached to a bridge area via connecting nodes. In addition, there was no need to delete previously created rail lines and replace them with new versions. This changeset has been reverted. Thank you and good luck with your mapping in the future.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-23 21:16:21+00:00): Er - ignore that comment.  Despite this changeset overlapping the Paracels it's nothing to do with them.  It's actually the deletion of a long untagged line that was presumably added by mistake.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84933504 for info.
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:48:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. I reverted your change set.
axelr (2020-05-24 13:10:37+00:00): Dein iD-Editor bringt da noch etwas mehr durcheinander. Die stop_position Schalker Meile war jeweils am Ende der Routen eingetragen. Ich hab es mal korrigiert.
redd (2022-06-12 13:55:59+00:00): Hi Stargazing,
why did you add key website_1 additional to website on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807635796? Are there 2 websites for exactly this object?
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:48:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. I reverted your change set.
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:48:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. I reverted your change set.
crisitunity (2020-05-27 09:56:31+00:00): Is this a mechanical changeset?
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:44:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Is this node one address (house number 625-627) or have the building two different units (one 625, the second 627).
Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
marczoutendijk (2021-12-23 19:31:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354080645

historic=* is describing or characterising an object and not a date. It seems you have been trying to put a date or number in the historic key. Maybe you should use start_date?
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ahistoric and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
lakedistrict (2021-12-24 14:47:06+00:00): Looks like this was added in an earlier changeset, and the mapper likely intended to use heritage=2 (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status#England) I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115338619 Merry Christmas!
marczoutendijk (2021-12-24 14:50:53+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2020-05-24 05:57:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Gebouwen in OSM worden geïmporteerd uit de BAG en zijn als zodanig precies ingemeten. Beter niets aan veranderen.
Gebouwen dragen niet nog eens het adres.Dat is dubbelop,
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-24 06:16:08+00:00): Dag Gert.. Het gebouw heb ik hersteld volgens conform de BGT. Bij periodieke import heb je kans dat er straks twee gebouwen staan. Dus om in de gaten te houden. Luchtfotos vertekenen. Niet naar de daken kijken.. het gaat om het maaiveld.
Het adres heb ik verwijderd van het gebouw. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-24 06:01:50+00:00): Voor openingstijden in het juiste fromaat kun je deze tool gebruiken.http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/


Svp geen adressen samenvoegen. Dan werkt de zoekfunctie niet meer.
23 A en B mankeert nu 
Dit was je edit. 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
eggie (2020-05-24 06:19:14+00:00): adressen hersteld
Pikse (2020-06-01 08:26:52+00:00): Enne, kui küsisid Tallinna relatsiooni kohta, ei märganud ma, et nüüd ongi lisatud asumite relatsioonid, mis on samuti admin_level-iga 9. Kas sobiks, kui teha nii nagu ennist pakkusin: admin_level 10 – asumid, 9 – (halduslikud) linnaosad ja 8 – siin erandlikult asula (linn)?

Teine asi, mida võib-olla kaaluda võiks: üldse mitte kasutada asumite juures silti boundary=administrative (type=boundary), kuna tegu pole halduspiiridega ja sellised atribuudid võivad seetõttu segadust tekitada. Sama käib küll ka külade ja teiste asulate kohta, mis samuti pole haldusüksused, aga siin ehk rohkemgi, kuna asumid pole ametlikud (või on vähem ametlikud). Siis vist tuleks küll sildi type=boundary asemel kasutada üldisemat silti type=multipolgyon ja openstreetmap.org piire ei kuvaks.
fghj753 (2020-06-01 15:27:30+00:00): Piiride admin_level-ite osas eelistus puudub. Hetkel on linnaosade piirid ise kantud kaardile 10. taseme piirna, mis tähendab, et mingid piirid tuleb tulevikus kindlasti ära muuta.
Kaalusin varianti, kus oleksid sildid type=multipolgon ja place=quarter, aga järele ei proovinud. Eesmärk oli/on saavutada olukord, kus paremklõpsuga avanev "Mis siin on" ja tavaline tekstiotsing tagastaksid asumi koos piiridega.
Äkki kõlbaks üldse asumi sõlme (node) kõik sildid liigutada relatsiooni nii, et tühja sõlme ainus eesmärk oleks öelda tarkvarale, kuhu joonistada asumi nimi?
Mul ei ole lähiajal aega kaarti parandada.
Pikse (2020-07-06 09:05:37+00:00): Ma võtsin siis kätte ja muutsin nüüd tasemed nii: 10 – asum, 9 – linnaosa, 8 – Tallinn ja Kohtla-Järve asustusüksusena. Püüdsin ka viki tabelis ja sealsel arutelulehel seda täpsustada ja dokumenteerida.

Ideaalis vist võiks küll olla nii, et nime ega muid silte poleks tarvis relatsiooni ja sõlme küljes dubleerida ning tühi sõlm oleks vaid nime paigutamiseks, aga ma ei tea, kas ükski OSM-i andmeid kasutav tarkvara oskab praegu tühja sõlmega midagi peale hakata.
user_5359 (2020-05-24 06:33:25+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Warum heißt denn die Postagentur plötzlich Getränkemarkt, obwohl wir noch einen separaten Punkt im Gebäude dafür haben? -> Revert!
Jarek 🚲 (2020-05-23 22:16:11+00:00): Apparently this continues further north, but I didn't have a chance to survey. Surveyed at Queen and at Lobb intersections.
andrewpmk (2020-05-23 22:24:05+00:00): These "local traffic only roads" are temporary, and most drivers are ignoring them. Do these belong in OSM?
Jarek 🚲 (2020-05-23 22:31:22+00:00): I live in the area so I can remove them if they're withdrawn. Most drivers also ignore the speed limits so shall we not tag those either?
Jarek 🚲 (2020-05-23 22:32:02+00:00): IMO it's valuable to tag them so people don't have the excuse of "GPS told me to drive here"
Reeniz (2020-05-23 23:23:21+00:00): Agregar street en el way de interpolation no es necesario
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85667257
blackboxlogic (2020-05-27 12:59:29+00:00): It looks like you're shifting everything south. I bet that the imagery you're using isn't aligned correctly. Please ask if you want help aligning your imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85667376
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:32:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You didn't add any building.
istefanos (2020-09-13 07:43:03+00:00): Are these 2 tags needed?
lanes:bus 	1
lanes:psv 	1

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55314314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55314313

Would lanes:psv=1 not be enough?
aceman444 (2020-09-13 14:46:07+00:00): Yes, psv should include bus so lanes:bus is redundant I probably wanted to promote from bus to psv and forgot to remove bus on these 2 segments. Thanks for noticing.
istefanos (2020-09-15 18:34:09+00:00): No problem, you're welcome. It's done.
Arlo James Barnes (2025-04-01 06:09:06+00:00): Thanks, I just added a reciprocal link from Wikidata
Syl (2020-07-11 22:11:53+00:00): Bonjour, ce bâtiment abrite vraiment une salle d'arcade ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807656729
Praet Tri-Men (2020-07-11 23:35:36+00:00): Bonjour, pas vraiment, il s'agit d'un club de Bridge essentiellement, j'ai fait la modif.
Syl (2020-07-12 10:45:22+00:00): Merci.
blackboxlogic (2020-05-25 15:01:20+00:00): mfreems,

I'm impressed by the breadth and detail of your campus mapping over that last few weeks. I made a comment on a previous change about trying to retain address details and it seems like you received that well and adjusted your technique, thank you. I hope to give more gentle feedback.

This change has some mix-up between "name" and "address". For example, WAY: 770655176. Its name (what people call it) was the "Womens Resource Center" and its address (what you put on an envelope) is "24 College Street". But you deleted the name, and put the address in the name field. Now, if someone searches for the "Womens Resource Center" by its name, they won't be able to find this place. You also did this in change# 85663150, and probably more changes after this one.

I checked the campus map (https://www.bowdoin.edu/about/campus-location/maps/Campus_Map_Oct_2018.pdf) and this building is listed as number 61: "Sexuality, Women, and Gender Center", so it seems the name in OSM was out of date, and could be updated, but not by putting the address in the name field.

Please ask if you have questions. I hope my suggestions don't come across as imposing.
mfreems (2020-05-25 15:49:18+00:00): Thank blackboxlogic. Your suggestions are all helpful and well taken!
eggie (2020-05-24 06:20:37+00:00): Yep.. dat was 'm...
joggdial3000 (2020-05-24 00:46:30+00:00): Contumil Region Update
mueschel (2020-05-27 12:48:47+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found some strange tags on the objects you added like these:
Lechuza Volado Serralunga
akıllı saksı
lechuza
saksı 	
serralunga
volado

These tags might describe the building, but they can not be used by any automated software because they are not defined.
Please have a look to the Wiki and read about common tags for buildings.
user_6771650 (2020-05-24 00:54:16+00:00): Hi copperwater,

Thanks for your contributions to OSM! Your changes look good, except for one small issue. the "ele" key should have a value in meters, not feet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85669036
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:23:03+00:00): Hello! You add to three nodes the tag capacity=0 (see https://www.osm.org/node/419230318). Is this shelter unusable?
RicoElectrico (2020-05-24 08:55:14+00:00): Cześć, chciałbym spytać dla pewności: droga przechodzi przez to, co do niedawna (wg zdjęć lotniczych) było polem?

https://imgur.com/a/sPySFD6

Domyślam się, że może tak być, bo przez cały ten teren przebiega jedna działka, najpewniej gminna.

Poprawiłbym natomiast kategorię tej drogi na highway=residential (w iD to chyba "droga lokalna" ) - taka sama jak ten fragment 3 Maja wychodzący z Poprzecznej.
kherba (2020-05-24 09:44:19+00:00): Cześć, tak, droga biegnie właśnie przez te pola. Gmina skupiła od właścicieli teren i powstała droga. Droga gminna, wewnętrzna. Jak zmienisz w trybie edycji warstwę tła na Maxtar to droga jest już widoczna. 
Zobaczę co z tym ID.
RicoElectrico (2020-05-24 13:00:30+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź.
iD to edytor online, którego używasz. ;)
user_5359 (2020-05-24 04:13:28+00:00): Hello! For a better description of opening hours please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
boototter (2020-05-24 01:08:34+00:00): de aanwijzingen bij het eiland blijken te werken. MP bij tuindersvereniging op analoge wijze bijgewerkt.
Daarnaast twee tests op verandering landuse=bushnell naar natural=scrub
eggie (2020-05-24 06:33:12+00:00): De mp is correct.. Je hebt het door!
Of alles op de juiste plaats ligt is even de vraag. Welke achtergrond heb je aan staan.
Bij upload gewoon even het hokje aanvinken "automatische brond huidige lagen tonen."
Op de relatie staat 
name= gras Egelantier..  Moet dat er niet af?   Evt als description=...  gebruiken.
Het noordelijke park is net zo;n chaos. Nog genoeg te doen daar. Daar heeft iemand van toponym=park een aantal tags erbij gezet.. leisure=park.
en landuse=grass.
Dat laatste heb ik gedaan omdat eht er anders niet uit zag.
Ook daar dus een aparte layer leisure=park.. toponym (depricated)  weghalen  net als de tag landuse=gras  en dan apart de landuse gaan intekenen in diie leisure=park 
Vlakken die geen mp zijn kun je laten aansluiten aan elkaar. 
Succes.. 
Gr Eggie
boototter (2020-05-24 13:16:45+00:00): die relatiebenamingen mogen er wat mij betreft af, zodra ik het park af heb. Maar zonder (voorlopige) benaming merkte ik, bij bewerking al snel foute mp's zonder duidelijke benaming te pakken te hebben. 
Gezien de hoeveelheid nog te doen staan ze er dus nog wel even.
siwilde (2020-05-25 00:00:43+00:00): Hi @ColetteB Some how you have mapped a "traffic Mirror" in this changeset - please be more careful with your tagging - If you need help or guidance please refer to the documents available on the Crowd2Map Slack channel and come ver there and ask questions if you have any - Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85669388
mariostevaux (2020-06-07 12:21:06+00:00): This gas station no longer exists. It is just a parking lot for the Shopping Mall
yvecai (2020-06-15 18:14:34+00:00): Oh, my bad to have made a changeset reaching both side of the Atlantic !
I don't think I touched a gas station, though. Can you spot the exact location.
mariostevaux (2020-06-20 23:01:49+00:00): The gas station does not exist anymore, just remove it.
compdude (2021-01-30 21:31:53+00:00): Is the US 10 bridge over the river still under construction/closed?
nickvet419 (2021-01-31 03:33:30+00:00): no
felipeeugenio (2020-05-25 04:10:27+00:00): Hola Leonel.
50 km/hr la velocidad máxima durante tanta distancia?
estás seguro?

saludos
LeonelChile (2020-05-28 02:11:27+00:00): Si a mi tambien me llamo mucho la atencion, pero todas las actualizacion de velocidad que estoy haciendo es por medio de street view de google y valido con el editor de mapas de Waze e informacion de vialidad.cl
cuando es necesario, el tema es que esa ruta en especifico tiene muchas curvas y la velocidad se mantiene, es lo que vi en la ruta.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:59:22+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2020-05-24 05:32:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for the key lowercase and for the name value mixcased characters.
Glassman (2020-05-25 22:48:56+00:00): paths, streets, sidewalks are usually added as a way (line). OSM does have pedestrian ways, like UW's Red Square, but these are unusual. By adding a path as a way it can be routed on, although I suspect no one needs a router to find their way around a golf course.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85671017
A67-A67 (2020-05-30 15:01:13+00:00): Hallo lyctkel,

Bedankt voor de detaillering van Delft!

Ik zag dat je dit voetpad voor de Albert Heijn hebt toegevoegd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807687598 Hier ligt echter geen vrijliggend voetpad, zoals aan de noordkant van de Martinus Nijhofflaan en de Voorhofdreef, maar slechts een stoep. Deze stoep wordt getagd als sidewalk=left/right/both op de naastgelegen weg, wat al is gebeurd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521337291. Eventueel kan de tag segregated=yes daaraan worden toegevoegd. Een aparte way betekent dat er een fysieke scheiding tussen het fietspad en het voetpad is, waar hier geen sprake van is.
lyctkel (2020-06-04 08:52:33+00:00): Hallo A67-A67,
Dank u wel voor de gedetailleerde informatie. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd. Alleen het kleine stukje naast de Aart van der Leeuwlaan heeft een aparte stoep (zie ook https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=ImATFBH-fDAdbMqcdCG_3Q&signs=true&points=true&lat=51.996264999999994&lng=4.350326666666667&z=17&trafficSign%5B%5D=complementary--accident-area--g1&mapFeature%5B%5D=construction--barrier--temporary&x=0.5127155238107579&y=0.5756860175874801&zoom=0).
Groet,
lyctkel
WoodWoseWulf (2020-05-24 05:38:08+00:00): Hi Bradlee,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additions!

Just some comments on your recent changes: f

Firstly the yard surrounding a house is not a park. OSM defines parks in a specific way, you can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park. If you want to map grassed areas, there are other tags you can use, such as landuse=grass or landuse=meadow depending on their application.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-05-24 05:41:23+00:00): (please excuse that random "f" I pressed comment to quickly)

And secondly, please be careful adding personal information to the map. Who owns a path or a private house shouldn't be added to the map. Additionally, there are limits to what you should add to private property, you can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-24 09:10:27+00:00): Please check the number of lanes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85671744
eversone (2020-05-24 09:28:46+00:00): you can go there and take a look.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-24 12:56:26+00:00): Exactly, how do you think I edited in all the basic details for them?
eversone (2020-05-25 16:12:41+00:00): From a TTA drawing?
user_5359 (2020-05-24 19:08:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
pbnoxious (2020-05-24 18:57:04+00:00): Da "review_requested" angeklickt wurde: "ÜF PFA21 Reichertshofen" sieht mir eher wie eine "Referenz" als der Name der Straße aus. Im Wiki gibts dazu mehr informationen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Sollte also in einen "ref=" tag umgeändert werden, weiß jetzt nicht ob man die Referenz noch spezifizieren sollte.
stephankn (2020-10-06 19:14:17+00:00): why are you re-tagging a residential into living_street? You had been part of the thread in which we decided, that due to the missing legal concept of living_streets in Thailand we are not using this. speed limits are always tagged when signed, access tags describe it in case the road is not open to the general public. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19316
Russ McD (2020-10-07 08:02:16+00:00): That was 8 years ago, and of course, since then, we have had the massive pollution caused by Facebook tagging everything as "residential".  
While there may not be a legal definition of a living street as such, in Thailand... roads in walled & secure gated communities in my mind, are of similar characteristics to the European counterparts.   Other people continue to tag in this manner, and I feel its the most appropriate tag to use.  I endeavour to only use for mapping within clearly defined "housing estates" rather than any small Soi with houses.
If you wish to  use your powers to do a mass change, that's up to you ... personally, I think we have far greater issues to worry about.
stephankn (2020-10-25 15:04:42+00:00): we should discuss this in the forum. Please bring up your arguments https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19316
user_5359 (2020-05-25 20:04:07+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal den Eintrag https://www.osm.org/node/7553151220 und den Wiki Eintrag https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:information%3Dguidepost an. Die Namen der Ziele sind keine Schlüssel.
yvecai (2020-05-27 18:58:37+00:00): Bon, je n'ai rien rajouté du tout et plutot rajouté une couche. Je répare celà ce week-end, désolé.
opendcc (2020-05-24 09:13:52+00:00): Hallo,

da ist jetzt leider was schief gegangen. Waterway=river gibt die Fließrichtung als Linie an, breite Flüße bekommen ergänzend waterway=riverbank für das Flächenabbild. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:water=river?uselang=de

Ich schlage vor, diesen Edit komplett rückgängig zu machen und dann die Feuerwehren erneut taggen.
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-12 06:50:05+00:00): This is the last fan of Master! You have even destroyed the province's border.
Rearden (2020-05-24 07:49:29+00:00): My bad, I didn't look correctly
user_2066394 (2020-05-24 10:06:07+00:00): geschlossene geschäfte statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
irulfs (2020-05-24 13:54:52+00:00): Okay, danke