piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Petró Tamás (2020-09-28 08:50:56+00:00): Szia!

Igen, sőt a Tisza-Maros összefolyásának a vonaláig még tovább is. Kb ott van egy kereszt, meg egy infó tábla, de így látatlanban nem merném bejelölni.

https://geocaching.hu/cacheimages/2019-04/97337_20190423_132542_23d152cabfaf024065909595abe19d980170c5db.jpg

https://geocaching.hu/cacheimages/2019-04/97337_20190423_132543_f92604552a11dfffb733b0988411287289dbfc4b.jpg
felipeeugenio (2020-09-27 23:15:34+00:00): Hola. Veo que borró varios rango de direcciones para reemplazarlos por los valores casa por casa. Lo que está muy bien, pero en Provenir y Bizet simplemente los borró. Planea hacer el mismo trabajo de reposición? o se trata de un error?. saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Connecticut (2020-09-28 09:55:43+00:00): auch private Auffahren dürfen und können eingetragen werden
ToniE (2020-09-28 11:38:03+00:00): Genau, dann an der Stelle des Tores ein barrier=gate, den Weg aufteilen und an den privaten Teil access=private dran - dann stimmt's mit der Realität überein.
MapMakerGal (2020-09-28 11:55:01+00:00): Boas tardes, por favor deixa de engadir o mesmo estabelecemento que xa está engadido, xa van dúas veces. Antes de engadir algo ao mapa revisa se xa está no mapa.
Moitas grazas!
Mike Raust (2020-09-28 11:29:28+00:00): Hi GFJ85,

you do very well appreciated work, but please use more "speaking" changeset comments.
In this case for example it's unclear why some power lines got deleted. Probably they'll come back better, but you'll understand how arcane this might appear to others.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91599198

Kind regards,
Mike
InsertUser (2020-10-13 07:44:59+00:00): Note that information about this is well hidden under:
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/our-work/south-west/south-west-maintenance-schemes/

The works references cited on one.network (formerly roadworks.org) return no relevant results.
Betanyahoo (2020-12-30 23:46:35+00:00): "edited road geometry" ≠ running the autovalidator on clearly wrong NHD reservoirs like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34764582/history
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-10-29 20:35:49+00:00): Just been editing Evia to fix bad edits by "cosmicadobo" but you've restored a previous note that sounds like some legal notice than a useful note for mappers (and no, I don't see any no-jaywalking or "bawal tumawid" signage anywhere at the roundabout/rotonda except the "Prohibited on Expressway" at the MCX entrance). Also, there are sidewalks from Daang Reyna to Biazon and Daang Hari, so foot=no also affects ped routing around the area.
DP24PH (2020-10-31 05:48:16+00:00): Will fix it right away with the revised right-side sidewalk specifications for the roundabout. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Øukasz (2020-09-30 12:34:35+00:00): Hi Khashea7,

I recently made some edits to improve road categorisation here, let me know if you have any comments please!

Thanks for all your edits,
Irma IRM-ED (2021-06-16 23:44:40+00:00): Hi  AlejandroAlba,
Thanks for your digitizing. However, this digitization occurs crossing the highway. How not cross with several highways?
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852208697
Thanks again.
opendcc (2020-09-28 04:20:53+00:00): Hallo,
seit wann ist der Blitzer weg?
blackboxlogic (2020-10-04 22:06:11+00:00): Heads up, I just fixed two ways from this change which had path=highway. There might be more?
thatoneiowan (2020-09-28 02:56:34+00:00): hello! just seeing you're putting a lot of work in over in my neck of the woods and figured i'd let ya know there's a decent amount of openstreetcam tracks I did a while back, in case it would be of any help to you. thanks!
literan (2020-09-28 11:30:13+00:00): Приветствую!
А до "Физтеха" не доведете строящийся участок ЛДЛ? там кто-то уже и стройплощадки отрисовал.
Alexey Lukin (2020-09-28 12:09:13+00:00): Добрый день! Я пока не видел новой схемы, но могу условно нанести по устаревшему (наземному) проекту.
literan (2020-09-28 12:38:11+00:00): наземный это ведь по линии бывшего подъездного пути к станции водоподготовки? Полагаю, нет смысла...
ralley (2020-09-28 23:43:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  For the service_times key can you please use the syntax as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91605276
manoj@1 (2020-10-06 04:56:29+00:00): hi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91606145
DaxServer (2021-01-22 13:55:18+00:00): Hi. Why are the primary_link roads marked as unclassified?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91606413
VLD262 (2021-01-22 18:29:30+00:00): Hi Srihari,
As the  primary_link road starts at node 2282213812 and ends here at node 3193994562 and the way mentioned is providing access to the destinations here node 2282213814 and node 4734162654. Hence i have modelled it as unclassified.
Thank you
DaxServer (2021-01-28 14:07:05+00:00): The primary function of this road is to provide access between NH16 and the Tenali - Managalagiri Road crossing it. In the process, it also provides access to local residential roads. It is recommended to tag with its primary function. Thanks!

Updated in https://osmcha.org/changesets/98301184
DaxServer (2021-01-22 13:53:01+00:00): Hi. Why is the primary_link road is marked as unclassified?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91606468
VLD262 (2021-01-22 18:34:41+00:00): Hi Srihari,
As the  primary_link road starts at node 4734163384 and ends here at  node 4734163381 and the way mentioned way 219016626 is providing access to many destinations. Hence i have modelled it as unclassified as it is serving access to many destinations and connecting many local roads.
Thank you
DaxServer (2021-01-28 14:06:02+00:00): The primary function of this road is to provide access between NH16 and the Tenali - Managalagiri Road crossing it. In the process, it also provides access to local residential roads. Thus these roads are also not oneway, but bi-directional. It is recommended to tag with it primary function. Thanks!

Updated in https://osmcha.org/changesets/98301184
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:56:46+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
DaxServer (2021-01-22 12:43:11+00:00): Hello Madhukar. Can you tell me why the primary road has been marked as tertiary? I see that you are based out of Hyderabad and thus I see that you are not a local mapper?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91607599
VLD262 (2021-01-22 18:10:44+00:00): Hi Srihari,
Thanks for writing, i have seen some classification inconsistency near (node 3870713456) and the road is connecting between two major highways from node 3870713369 and node 3870713456. So i maintained tertiary consistency.

Thank you.
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:21:19+00:00): Hi. I have looked at all the ways between the two nodes and I could not find any inconsistency. Can you be more specific? You may use https://osmcha.org and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history to look into the history of the objects. There are other tools as well, but you can start with these I think. I'll be reverting the entire stretch back to primary tag. Thanks!
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:31:50+00:00): The tags are updated here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98011598
DaxServer (2021-01-26 14:30:14+00:00): Hi Madhukar. Can you explain the inconsistency you have found back then? Do you have any notes?
ArcherMaps (2021-01-26 16:03:01+00:00): Hi Srihari,
Thanks for your suggestions, as the primary highway was ending abruptly on secondary  highway here node 3870713456. So, i have maintained classification consistency. Also i noticed we have two major highways i.e. primary highway(way 256963317) and National Highway NH16 running parallelly. Hence i changed the connecting road to ensure classification consistency. Anyways appreciate your changes.
Thank you
VLD262 (2021-01-26 17:13:43+00:00): Hello Srihari , Appreciate your inputs. As the road is acting as connecting road between two major highways and has inconsistency in classification at node 4655108491. I have made changes, also there is no ref or route relation tagged to the pre existing highway and acting as main road with in the suburb.
DaxServer (2021-01-26 18:54:05+00:00): Hi Madhukar. The way 374384085 (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/374384085) should have been marked with limited access. I have made the update here https://osmcha.org/changesets/98179434
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:55:50+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Rps333 (2020-12-13 14:11:08+00:00): is this road really here ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184961614

I cannot see it in the imagery.
dgitto (2020-09-29 07:24:58+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:54:19+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:52:52+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:50:38+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
naveenpf (2020-10-01 10:15:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91612954
naveenpf (2020-10-01 10:38:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91613234
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:44:24+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
Stalker61 (2020-09-28 19:44:04+00:00): Hi
I ask the next representative of the Apple Data Team not to touch the rivers in this region, and in particular the Irtysh. Within the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra, everything is already aligned and referenced with an offset according to BING images. The required corrections have already been made and are being made without the need for your participation. Making edits on images without reference and with a water level exceeding average marks, you only harm and force rollbacks.
eggie (2020-09-28 06:58:29+00:00): Dag Jan-Peter..
De straatnaam zal vast niet hondenuitlaatplaats zijn.
Je kunt een hondenuitlaatterrein mappen op een vlak als leisure=dog_park


Denk dat access=private hier er af kan. Het is geen 'achterom'

Hier een voorbeeld van een hondenuitlaatplaats..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.77523/4.66399

Kijk je nog even?

MVG,Eggie
tux67 (2020-09-28 07:07:52+00:00): Hallo TehaJott,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst, gibt aber auch immer beim Hochaden des Änderungssatzes eine Quelle deines Wissens an.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91615025
PT-53 (2020-09-28 07:45:32+00:00): Hallo stadtmm,
Du hast an dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34205985/history#map=16/48.0096/10.1619
den Straßennamen Wittmannstraße ergänzt. Die Straße ist aktuell auf der gesamten Länge als Wohngebietsstraße eingestuft und mit den Merkmalen
access=no und
motor_vehicle=agriculturale
für den allgemeinen Verkehr voll gesperrt. Da dürften also z.B. keine PKWs und auch keine Radfahrer dort fahren.
Das dürfte so wohl nicht mehr stimmen. Vermutlich müßte man die Straße am Ende des Baugebietes aufsplitten und entlang des Baugebietes die Access-Merkmale löschen. Der westl. Teil ist vermutlich nur ein Feldweg und sollte dann auf 
highway=track
heruntergestuft werden.
Hast Du entspr. Ortskenntnisse und kannst sagen oder nachschauen, ob dort entspr. Verkehrszeichen stehen?
Im Verkehrszeichen-Tool kannst Du die Verkehrszeichen anklicken und bekommst dann die korrekten Access-Merkmale angezeigt:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
Grüße
ckramer-hl (2020-11-29 11:03:05+00:00): Hallo Jan,
ich habe gesehen, dass du die Pfitznerstraße bereits umbenannt hast. Bis zum  heutigen TAg (2020-11-29) ist lautet das Schild weiterhin auf Pfitznerstraße. Wäre es nicht sinnvoll erst dann eine Umbenennung vorzunehmen, wenn sie auch in der Natur vollzogen wurde.
Herzlichen Gruß
Carsten
ckramer-hl (2020-12-06 16:51:04+00:00): Hallo Jan,
bin heute (2020-12-06) wieder dort vorbei gekommen, Jetzt ist das Straßenschild auch geändert.
Carsten
user_136804 (2020-10-08 22:05:31+00:00): These service roads were torn up over a year ago as part of the ongoing construction on a new UNC Health Care building and parking garage.  I removed them (for the third or fourth time now) in changeset #92197749.  Please don't map new features in marked construction sites without an on-the-ground survey first!
avipsha (2020-10-09 10:04:30+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit, I've missed to check the latest aerial imagery. Will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
avipsha.
tomhukins (2020-10-15 13:55:45+00:00): Hi, thank you for helping to improve the map.  It seems a bit strange, and a missed opportunity, to add these parking aisles without a surrounding amenity=parking area.
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:19:18+00:00): Hallo rodestar,
Du hast in diesem CS u.a. diesen Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8094450/history
als Baustelle markiert und die Straße damit vollständig gesperrt.
Wie lange daueren denn die Baußmaßnahmen dort und wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Fragende Grüße
rodeostar (2020-10-09 05:25:52+00:00): Hallo PT-53, diese Informationen. findest du im Amtsblatt der Stadt Böblingen in den Ausgabe vom: 21.08.2020 & 02.10.2020. 
Zeiträume sind in den Artikeln mit angegeben.
VG, rodeostar
rodeostar (2020-10-09 05:26:21+00:00): Nachtrag: https://www.krzbb.de/krz_200_0_Boeblingen.html
PT-53 (2020-10-09 07:40:46+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Könntest Du bei Gelegenheit noch an die gesperrten Abschnitte jeweils eine Note mit der voraussichtlichen Sperrdauer ergänzen.

Grüße
dragon422 (2020-09-28 07:08:13+00:00): Poza tym, droga od zawsze przechodziła przez dzierżawę, więc nigdy nie powinna istnieć na mapach
pio2_122 (2020-09-28 12:51:59+00:00): W pełni rozumiem edycję, jednak możliwe, że ktoś ponownie doda tą drogę ze względu na niewiedzę.

Według mnie lepszym rozwiązaniem jest by ta ścieżka widniała na mapie, ale posiadała oznaczenie, że dostęp do niej jest prywatny (znacznik access=private) - rozpoznają to wszytskie nawigacje, a dodatkowo droga jest inaczej wyświetlana na mapie.

Jeśli mogę to poprawić za Ciebie :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91618391
xronos (2020-10-01 23:10:44+00:00): вообще тропа существует, но прохода нет, закрыто калиткой. Зачем удалена калитка?
xronos (2020-10-01 23:18:10+00:00): кроме того - по этой тропинке могут ходить люди у которых есть ключи от калитки. 
Поэтому я её восстановил
sleemp (2020-10-07 12:58:50+00:00): Перепроверил на местности еще раз. Обошел с другой стороны. Таки да, там просто калитка с магнитным замком в одном месте, а со стороны СНТ было похоже, что на месте тропы теперь чья-то закрытая территория. Спасибо за поправку, буду внимательнее.
abakus_uploader (2020-09-28 22:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tomhukins (2020-09-28 07:43:37+00:00): Has this scrub been replaced by an extension of the industrial area mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8880937 ?  If it has, it would be helpful to fix the extent of that area and maybe add an new buildings too.
srderang (2020-09-30 04:33:39+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the modifications based on the community suggestions and available resources. please find the changeset for the added buildings # 91739317. I am not sure of the extension of the industrial area, please let me know if it can be confirmed by the local knowledge,  I will be happy to make the necessary modifications. Always cheerful to learn new  things from the community and improve our editing quality.
gileri (2020-09-28 08:30:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Quel est l'intérêt d'ajouter bicycle=yes sur tous les highway=service ?

Ces voies par défaut n'ont pas de restriction d'accès, afin d'éviter de devoir ajouter partout :

- foot=yes

- bicycle=yes

- horse=yes

- stroller = yes

- motorcycle=yes

- psv = yes

etc.
Dimacn (2020-09-30 06:19:44+00:00): Скажите, по какой причине вы удалили точку barrier=gate - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5530437778  Эти ворота в мае этого года там ещё существовали.
eggie (2020-09-28 08:30:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review  Zoals je ziet is hier nogal wat schade ontstaan. Wat is je bedoeling precies. Ik zal even kijken of ik het kan herstellen.
MVG,
Eggie

Je edits 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91621163
eggie (2020-09-28 08:35:20+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om natural	wetland
wetland	Floodplains op een aparte node te gaan taggen.

Landuse gaan aanpassen als startende mapper zou ik niet direct aan beginnen. lees je goed in wat we van startende mappers verwachten en hoe te mappen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-28 08:36:38+00:00): reverted by changeset #91624900
eggie (2020-09-28 08:53:54+00:00): Landuse aangepast naar natural=wetland wetland=wet_meadow

Rendering duurt even. 
Gr eggie
iWowik (2020-10-03 06:58:47+00:00): Очень мило.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468825103/history
Невозможное сочетание букв в белорусском варианте названия
Prusaker (2020-10-03 07:53:16+00:00): Поправил.
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:07:52+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
naaitha (2021-02-15 10:01:01+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for looking into the edit, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99298357). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
naaitha.
fiscal (2021-03-02 08:35:35+00:00): Please delete neighboring wrong TIGER data like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12460498/history
befit1 (2021-03-03 08:49:23+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your inputs, we will try to integrate these points in our editing work flow. Deleted the road name in this changeset>>100332647

Regards,
befit
daganzdaanda (2020-12-01 21:40:19+00:00): Hi, einen Weg auswählen, Shift drücken und auf den 2. Weg klicken, dann "C" drücken zum verbinden (oder Rechtsklick und dann das Plus im aufgeklappten Menu) ...
daganzdaanda (2020-12-01 21:51:36+00:00): Die passendere Weg-Art ist wahrscheinlich der "Feld- und Waldweg" (track), zu finden unter "Nebenstraßen". Im Bereich "erlaubter Zugang" sollte man nur das nötigste eintragen, vor allem wenn irgendwelche Schilder da sind für Erlaubnis oder Verbot.
daganzdaanda (2020-12-01 21:58:56+00:00): Ich habe die Wege jetzt mal so bearbeitet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95118475
Der südlichste Teil deines Weges war mit der Grenze verklebt. Damit das nicht passiert, müsstest du wahrscheinlich näher ran zoomen.
daganzdaanda (2020-12-01 22:00:34+00:00): Vom Luftbild her denke ich, dass es hier noch einige Wege zu erkunden und zu mappen gibt -- bleib bitte dran :-)