piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-13 04:44:57+00:00): This is also a non-field-not-showing-up error: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1522292#map=19/37.51570/127.12961&layers=N Can I fix that the way I’ve explained it over here?
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-13 19:23:08+00:00): (By the way, I found a mentor. Freebeer, if you also want to be a mentor, please let me know).
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-13 19:25:28+00:00): Those errors I've listed mostly contain sports fields not showing up. I've found some people who want to help with fixing these errors. If anyone else wants to help it would be appreciated a lot.
pangoSE (2018-09-13 19:26:55+00:00): Hi :)

Thanks a lot for changing your strategy to asking first. 

The key to succes with this is JOSM. Install it now, then read on.

Looking at your posts I see a lot of notes. I looked at a few.
Let me take an example:
1) Stadium in Silkeborg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1522313#map=19/56.18424/9.57528&layers=N
You correctly noticed that the pitch was missing from the stadium and added it with this edit 7 days ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623566222/history
BUT
To as you correctly state this data does not show on OSM Carto (default map on osm.org) BECAUSE it renders in layers. In this case it renders the pitch FIRST and the stadium on top SECOND.
Do you understand?
To see this you need to click the arrow with a questionmark and click the map. 
So how to fix this?

Method no.1)
Force the pitch on top with layer=1. This might work
or
Method no. 2)
Select both elements in JOSM and choose edit->create multipolygon. The stadium is outer and the pitch is inner.

Method no. 3)
Add way where the stands end towards the pitch (this is not a rectangular way as it follows the round corners of the lower part of the stands. Select this way (role=inner and the outer stadium and pitch (inner) and ->create multipolygon.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-13 20:03:53+00:00): Thank you for your very good information PangoSE :) I’ll start with JOSM soon.
pangoSE (2018-09-14 08:53:23+00:00): Congratulations on finding a mentor! :D
I see you have not edited for two days, thanks for listening to my request.
Good luck with mentored editing going forward. You will probably soon be able to teach me how to edit better when you have got the hang of it. ;-)
pangoSE (2018-09-14 08:55:59+00:00): Regarding your long list of notes I would like to say that your are in NO way required to follow up on you own notes. I leave a lot of notes around and if nobody else sees to them I eventually come around (sometimes years after) to fix it myself when I feel confident about how to do the edit correctly.
I see the notes as a gift to the community. Not an obligation that must be met by anyone.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-14 13:25:21+00:00): Yes, I agree with your request, I think it's a good idea. Can you please take a look at my last two edits from a few days back:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62510515

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62510357

All of the 69 errors I've posted seem to have an identical problem with the field not showing up, which can be solved the way I've added the multipolygon in these two edits. Those two edits were fine, I asked other people to check these two for possible errors but they said both are okay. Do you think I can fix those other errors exactly the same way? Or should I wait for a mentor to have time for me? I guess if I fix them the same way as my last two edits, nothing can go wrong (if you disagree, please let me know).

I think adding missing houses (like I did over here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62479759 ) also is pretty "safe" to do without a mentor. Those are easy edits, just drawing lines according to Bing (or with JOSM). I've added thousands of missing houses and never received a complaint about those edits, so I guess they're fine. If you disagree, just let me know :)
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-14 18:14:23+00:00): Hm, maybe it’s better to do these errors with a mentor indeed. It might be more complicated than I think.
pangoSE (2018-09-14 18:58:06+00:00): Adding simple stuff like buildings specifying the source is fine by me.
pangoSE (2018-09-14 19:21:30+00:00): From now on I recommend you to begin writing blog articles (se your profile on osm.org and click "my diary") or write to a talk-mailinglist when you have questions and lists like these. 
I'm going to revert the change to this stadium now because of all the deleted nodes.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-14 19:56:47+00:00): If you revert the edit, please add the three new stands, because the stadium has been completely rebuilt except for one stand. How it looked before my edit is absolutely NOT how the stadium looks now.
pangoSE (2018-09-14 20:21:44+00:00): I decided agains reverting because of the history of the nodes was only v2 and your edits was an improvement after all. I changed it further and the area around it.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-14 23:50:12+00:00): Thanks PangoSE :)
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 04:46:18+00:00): After I‘ve watched YouTube tutorials and read several Wiki pages, I did hundreds of edits and only one of those contained an error. This error was about the Duke stadium, it has already been reverted. I did add the athletics track of the stadium, which was still on Bing, but I should have checked if the stadium had been renovated recently because the athletics track has been removed (and some other renovation works took place at that stadium). I think my most recent edits are better than the old ones, but I should still be careful with my edits because I might not understand every detail 100% perfectly. The last days, I’ve fixed a lot of my older edits which contained
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 04:57:44+00:00): errors. I’ve added alt_names for example instead of double stadium names like “Kilmac Stadium (Dens Park)”. I’ve also added multipolygons the right way, I’ve learned that the stadium tag should cover the entire stadium area and that the building tag shouldn’t overlap with the field. I think I should give a more detailed explanation when I edit something, like recently renovated stadiums with stands which are not yet visible on the maps. I think adding a temporary note before I start editing might be a good idea. This way, people can give hints or discuss my proposed edit before I start anything.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 09:18:28+00:00): I will fix those 69 errors soon with JOSM (“mentor” wants to help with this). They’re all about sports fields not showing up, I’ve fixed those before and they look fine now.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 09:20:17+00:00): The “force the pitch on top” on JOSM also seems a good / easy / fast method. Thanks for the info about this above here PangoSE.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 12:35:46+00:00): Sorry PangoSE but you've made serious mistakes at your edit of the stadium in Helsingborg. Please fix it. Here you can see how the stadium looks like now (no, this link can not be used as a source for OSM but it is just to show you a good picture of the stand on top, which now has the same size as the stand below. The stand on the left also has a different shape, please take a better look before you edit: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Helsingborg,+Zweden/@56.0501038,12.7062297,256m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x46522d7a50a22925:0x4019078290e7a90!8m2!3d56.0464674!4d12.6945121

Here more pictures which can't be used as a source, but where you can see the stadium before and after.

Before: https://static3.depositphotos.com/1007097/230/i/950/depositphotos_2302355-stock-photo-olympia-panorama.jpg

Before: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a7/48/ba/a748ba2295a117062586544b3fd019a3.jpg

After: http://www.theexpateagle.com/wp-content/uploads/olympia-panorama-900x599.jpg

After: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gPiPIwRxbKo/maxresdefault.jpg

Do you see the difference?
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 12:38:15+00:00): As you can see, the stadium has three completely new stands with a larger size. You've re-added the old stands, which don't excist anymore.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 12:46:22+00:00): Take a look at this pink area I drew: https://image.ibb.co/mhWMzz/stadium.jpg

That's now also part of the stadium. Why did you remove it? I've visited this stadium (and hundreds of other stadiums, I'm a groundhopper), I saw its new shape.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-15 13:30:02+00:00): Another thing: I've made this sports field visible. My mentor told me how I could fix it. I guess this edit is fine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62611974#map=19/35.57270/-5.34858
andrewwiseman (2018-10-23 00:00:10+00:00): Hi Danirazi, thanks for mapping. However you are adding these as land use, they should be buildings instead
BeKri (2018-09-10 13:21:39+00:00): Servus,
gut dass Du gemerkt hast, das Du (wohl aus versehen) den Isaak rausgelöscht und jetzt wieder eingetragen hast.
Übernimm doch bitte noch von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/835352222/history die fehlenden Einträge, speziell Öffzeit etc.
Gruss derBeKri
BeKri (2018-09-10 13:24:22+00:00): Und weil ich es erst jetzt sehe:
Das Reiskorn
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/678070759 bedarf wohl auch einer Nacharbeit.
biffe (2018-09-10 19:10:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. War wirklich nicht beabsichtigt. Ich hoffe, dass die neuen Änderungen jetzt die Inhalte wieder korrigiert haben.
BeKri (2018-09-11 04:33:44+00:00): Glaub ich Dir, dass das ned beabsichtigt war wobei mehr interessieren würde wie das passieren konnte 
Sieht gut aus, beim Reiskorn war noch ne Vorwahl (189 statt 089) falsch,
aber das schon "etwas" länger ;-)
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/678070759
Gruss und weiter viel Spaß
derBeKri
biffe (2018-09-11 08:08:17+00:00): Ich habe im Browser (firefox) mit iD editiert. Vielleicht lag es am Touchpad, denn ich habe etwas in der Gegend gescrollt. Allerdings war ich nur an Cafés interessiert und kann mich nicht erinnern, das Reiskorn überhaupt angeklickt zu haben. Sehr komisch. Vielen Dank fürs Prüfen!
itsfreetux (2018-09-14 07:48:38+00:00): this is not true please stop that.
این کار با استاندارد های رسم نقشه و دیتای osm مغایرت دارد و با عرض پوزش تغییرات شما را پاک میکنم برای اطلاع از نحوه صحیح رسم نقشه و ریلیشن ها و درجه بندی های معابر و مرزبندی به گروه osm ایران در تلگرام مراجعه کنید.
logs.ir/osmiran
itsfreetux (2018-09-14 07:59:09+00:00): this is not true please stop that.
این کار با استاندارد های رسم نقشه و دیتای osm مغایرت دارد و با عرض پوزش تغییرات شما را پاک میکنم برای اطلاع از نحوه صحیح رسم نقشه و ریلیشن ها و درجه بندی های معابر و مرزبندی به گروه osm ایران در تلگرام مراجعه کنید.
lugs.ir/osmiran
Mike Baggaley (2018-09-12 14:06:13+00:00): Please do not make up names so that they appear on the standard rendered map. Please either find out its proper name, or leave it blank if it has no name or you cannot find it.

Thanks,
Mike
andrum99 (2018-09-12 15:25:31+00:00): Apologies - I spotted that someone had added 'sandpit' as a name on something at nearby Auchmuty High School and assumed it was therefore OK to do it that way. I will be more careful in future. I've also added 'tennis courts' as the name of the school's tennis courts - do you want me to remove that?

For the bowling green - the club is called Dovecot Bowling Club, but that includes the adjacent building which is the pavilion. Not sure how that should be entered on the map - presumably draw and area round the green and pavilion and name that as 'Dovecot Bowling Club'?
GinaroZ (2018-09-15 20:04:18+00:00): The convention seems to be to add the name to the bowling green (see examples in Edinburgh)
BCNorwich (2018-09-10 13:46:39+00:00): Reverted deletion
abrensch (2018-09-11 05:59:36+00:00): Hallo TV Prignitz,

herzlich willkommen bei Open-Streetmap.

Dir scheint ein Fehler unterlaufen zu sein beim Verlegen der "Tour Brandenburg", weil Du dabei einen Teil der L12 gelöscht hast. Ich habe daher Deine beiden Änderungssätze revertiert.

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst für einen neuen Versuch, sag einfach Bescheid

Gruss, Arndt
user_5173844 (2018-09-10 13:19:46+00:00): Hi Samuel, was there anything wrong with these roads? If they're private simply tag them as such, don't delete them.
BCNorwich (2018-09-10 13:43:33+00:00): Hi there, it looks like you are changing the tag then instead of deleting the original tag you are inadvertently deleting the feature entirely.

Please wait while an effort is made to reinstate the deleted features.

Regards Bernard
Samuel Topham (2018-09-10 13:58:34+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
These are private tracks, I do not want them listed on any mapping software. We have already had cased of apps using these private tracks for walks. By not indicating them as tracks the apps will not be able to featured. 

If there this applies to all my changes. If there is a 'Private Track' listing then I will think about using it. 

Regards,

Sam
user_5173844 (2018-09-10 14:20:56+00:00): Simply tagging them as access=private would do the job. If there are any gates or barriers they could be added too. Pretty much all routing software is aware of them, otherwise it would be unusable.
BCNorwich (2018-09-10 17:35:02+00:00): Hi, you can tag them as said access=private, access=agriculture and even add a foot=no tag rather than delete them. Also I query why there is a need to delete farmland remote from where folk might walk?

Regards Bernard.
Minh Nguyen (2018-09-14 10:30:48+00:00): By the way, the Mapbox imagery layer has the most recent imagery in this part of Northern Kentucky.
surveyor54 (2018-09-10 15:09:19+00:00): Hallo THXisONLINE,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine ersten Eintragungen und Änderungen.

Bitte noch die Adressen im Stolperstein nach folgender Vorlage aus dem OSM-Wiki abändern:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine

memorial:addr=.....

und die andere Adresse wieder raus, denn ein Stolperstein hat keine Adresse wie ein Gebäude.

Damit Kollegen (andere Mapper) bei Änderungen u. Ergänzungen die Qualität bestehender Einträge besser einschätzen können, sollte man Angaben über die Herkunft der Daten (z.B. Bing, Mapbox, Ortskenntnis, GPS-Track, georeferenzierte Fotos, ...)machen.

Weiterhin frohes Mappen,

Gruß
surveyor54
DD1GJ (2018-09-10 21:33:37+00:00): Hallo THXisONLINE, ebenfalls danke und willkommen. Die Steine sind einzeln verlegt und wir erfassen sie daher auch einzeln. Dies hat auch den Vorteil, dass so automatische Abgleiche oder die Erstellung von Namenslisten möglich ist. Auf der Standard-Karte wird zwar nur ein Name angezeigt, aber es gibt spezielle Karten wie http://www.historic.place/themes/stolpersteine/index.html?zoom=17&lat=48.76307&lon=8.23389&layers=B0000TT

Klick einen mit einem Kreis an. Das bedeutet, dass auch Bilder aus Wikimedia-Commons verknüpft sind

Melde Dich einfach bei weiteren Fragen.
BeKri (2018-09-11 04:47:36+00:00): Servus,
schade, das mit dem löschen der Adressnodes die Information, wo der Eingang ist, verloren geht. Wäre schön gewesen, wenn Du den Node zu entrance=yes umgewandelt hättest.
Gruss derBeKri
Alexander-II (2018-09-10 23:28:50+00:00): Опять у вас дичь в данных.  
  
Читайте вики, для чего и как используется тег ref. Точно не для словестного описания, где находится объект.  
  
name и name:en в данном случая должны совпадать, в том числе в регистре.  
  
Поправлю, когда буду выгружать свои правки.
PinguDEV (2024-05-07 14:53:01+00:00): Hey @gbl_streetmap, hallo erstmal :)!
Die hier ansässige Firma (ob sie noch exisitiert, weiß ich nicht) sollte man nicht als Name für das Gebäude eingeben. Dafür erstellt man normalerweise einen getrennten Punkt (POI) und taggt den dann richtig. Ob diese Firma noch existiert würde ich, wenn du dich nicht melden solltest (kann ja passieren) einfach mal selber aufsuchen und bei bedarf umtaggen.
Grüße, Pingu
GOwin (2018-09-12 04:30:30+00:00): When classifying roads, use the appropriate highway tags (e.g, secondary, unclassified, etc) depending on their function in the local road network. Do not tag for the renderer.
muralito (2018-09-10 17:10:50+00:00): Hola. En el nombre va solo el nombre. El restpo va en la etiqueta "description".
topolusitania (2018-09-12 15:39:58+00:00): Can you explain why the name "Baiãs" is deprecated ?
Tomas Straupis (2018-09-10 16:59:53+00:00): Nebėra tokios gyvenvietės
Osm1980 (2018-09-25 19:23:59+00:00): سلام دوست من داری تگ ها رو اشتباه وارد میکنی به تذکرات قبلی هم که بهت دادم توجه نمیکنی!!!
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2018-09-25 19:54:53+00:00): سلام آقای اسدی ، حق کاربر 
Osm1980
درست میگویند و استفاده از تگ
town 
برای اینجا اشتباه هستش
viloan (2018-09-10 13:41:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AlxndrRZN (2018-09-10 13:45:04+00:00): Рязанские правки!!!
diskmanti (2018-09-11 08:50:40+00:00): te lutem te vendosni metodat e pagses ne nje menyre te sakte sic eshte shprehur tek wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
mariotomo (2021-11-10 23:37:51+00:00): hola. en este conjunto de cambios añades un nombre abreviado, que no entiendo: "Entrada de la Bda La Feria".  qué sería?
Tomas Straupis (2018-09-11 05:04:58+00:00): Natrūaliai atsiradę (dideli) vandens telkiniai - natural=water. Žmonių iškasti/užtvenkti dideli telkiniai - landuse=reservoir, o prie namų esančios kūdros - landuse=basin.
SilvereX (2018-09-11 05:58:00+00:00): O šiuo atveju kas čia? Lyg ir reservoir? Kartais labai sunku pasakyti.
Tomas Straupis (2018-09-11 06:58:05+00:00): Tarkime čia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/55.03207/25.33166
Laukuose išsimėtę vandens plotai. Jų kilmė nėra žmogiška, todėl natural=water.
Landuse=basin netinka, nes šitie vandens telkiniai dar ir gerokai per dideli, kad būtų „kūdros“.
viloan (2018-09-10 14:13:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2018-09-10 16:06:49+00:00): What are you drawing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62455966
johnny_1982 (2018-09-13 22:35:58+00:00): "Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover" war bereits lange gemappt. Wieso wurde es noch einmal hinzugefügt? Ich entferne den (schlechteren) POI.
johnny_1982 (2018-09-13 22:47:00+00:00): Landtag und Aegidienkirche Hannover waren ebenfalls bereits in OSM enthalten!
highflyer74 (2018-09-15 12:51:10+00:00): Das ist vermutlich (noch immer) der Fehler der Wheelmap App. Das wird von den Entwicklern einfach nicht gefixt.

@rolligirl1985: könntest Du vielleicht einen richtigen Editor für die Bearbeitung von OSM verwenden? Wir sind da gern behilflich. Leider haben wir massive Probleme mit Einträgen von Wheelmap (siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59829). Viele Grüße!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-10 18:51:51+00:00): Novamente, solicito que mencione no comentário o que alterou. Você submeteu dez edições com o comentário "porque existem poucas ruas lançadas aqui e porque estive lá recentemente". Isto não indica absolutamente nada.
Neste conjunto devia te colocado "alterei o nome da rua, adicionei a velocidade máxima, o tipo de pavimento e o número de faixas de rodagem".
Outra questão, esta estrada mudou de nome quando? É que a placa toponímia na intersecção com a Estrada Nicolau Tolentino Vieira, não é o que você colocou, mas o que já estava no OpenStreetMap.

Cumprimentos,
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 12:07:10+00:00): Esta Parte assinalada é de superfície de alcatrão e agora tem o nome de "Caminho das Funduras", que continua com o mesmo nome pela Serra das Funduras até ao Caminho da Fajã dos Rolos, tem 2 faixas de rodagem
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-10 18:42:56+00:00): Boa tarde Feliz Pereira, 
É a terceira vez que solicito que me contacte e fundamente as suas edições antes de proceder a mais edições no mapa.

Cumprimentos
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-10 18:44:33+00:00): E novamente esta é uma edição danosa. Esta estrada não possui toponímia municipal, logo é uma Estrada Florestal.
Serão revertidas.
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 11:59:21+00:00): Olá Senhor Nuno Caldeira, novamente,  Estrada Florestal da Serra das Funduras tem uma toponímia de Caminho das funduras que começa no nó do Miradouro da Portela, vai pela Serra das Funduras e termina em baixo no fim do Caminho da Fajã dos Rolos. Assim sendo o Caminho do Lameirão termina termina onde está agora o início da Estrada Florestal da Serra das Funduras, sendo aquela primeira Parte do Caminho das Funduras, agora assinalado mal como estrada do Lameirão de alcatrão e só depois é que a estrada é de terra e gravila. O Caminho das Funduras vai pela Sera das Funduras até ao Caminho da Fajã dos Rolos em terra e gravila. No entanto, a parte final do Caminho das Funduras, à esquerda quem desce, tem cerca de 20 metros de alcatrão para dar acesso ao Caminho Casais Cima da Rocha, que introduzi também e que tenho o trilho correto através de uma trilha nova que enviei feita no dia 04 de setembro, salvo erro. de 2018, e daí fazer sentido as introduções que fiz, com os tipos de superfície que está atualmente. Não foi uma alteração danosa, acredite. Estou apenas tentar ser útil à sociedade em geral e partilhar o meu conhecimento. Para variar tinha feito de uma forma não seguindo as regras definidas (falha minha)
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-13 12:32:37+00:00): Não foi essa a edição que você tinha colocado. Você tinha alterado para Estrada das Funduras, quando esse troço.
A estrada do Lameirão está correta e sim vai até ao gancho da Portela (ER110 - Estrada Nicolau Tolentino Vieira).

Citação: "No mesmo local, estão condicionadas as seguintes vias:

    Estrada do Lameirão entre a Ribeira de Machico e Portela (derrocada);"

Fonte: https://www.jm-madeira.pt/regiao/ver/27695/Machico_lanca_informacao_operacional_a_populacao
eggie (2024-05-01 18:16:30+00:00): Hoi OttoR,

Zou jij even als voorgaande mapper naar deze changeset kunnen kijken van een relatief nieuwe mapper..

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150761515#map=19/52.37068/4.92476

MVG
eggie