piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yaugenka (2018-07-01 19:51:46+00:00): Привет!
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7529385
Ну зачем опять переименовали в станцию? Везде же, кроме видимо знака, поселок называется просто "Рожанка".
Раз уже мапите для нашей страны и хотите делать это с пользой, заходите в наш телеграм чат https://t.me/byosm, и там обсудим этот вопрос со всеми участниками осм Беларуси.
Jay May (2018-07-01 20:09:46+00:00): Hello Yaugenka.
Thanks for your proposition, but I am already in the Telegram discussion for a long time.
Remember we already had this discussion a couple of months ago with the DWG with a similar case. What is on the roadsign *prevails* over the data the administration has. 
And this is again the kind of case where the Belarusian administration's data is one big mess. Sometimes it is outdated, and sometimes it is wrong (I had cases with 2 villages placed exactly the opposite as they are in reality). Hence, we don't need to confuse travelers even more with questions why they see "Станцыя Ражанка" instead of "Ражанка".
Those 2 villages are differentiated not only on the ground, but also on pre-war Polish maps (Różanka vs. Stacja Różanka). If the ground truth showed "Ражанка", I wouldn't have changed that. You already know my aim is not at vandalizing, just showing the ground truth.
As we had agreed at that time with that case we had discussed with the DWG, I left the official name in the "alt_name" so the data isn't lost. You already have a village called simply "Ражанка" nearby, which will only confuse travellers.

Thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
J.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2018-06-27 12:39:09+00:00): Is "Camperplasts" realy the name? .. or a typo?
eggie (2018-06-30 18:41:50+00:00): name correction
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2018-06-27 17:53:29+00:00): Hi,
on these buildings I saw several keys with spaces in them like "building use" (should be building:use) and "wall: material" (wall:material). Could you have a look and fix these spelling mistakes?

Jan
abakus_uploader (2018-06-27 22:32:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2018-06-27 22:32:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2018-07-01 16:47:39+00:00): Hi,
could you decide on one version of the tag? Now we have "still_visible_on", "visible_in" and "visible_on".
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-05 08:19:52+00:00): If that is really problematic for you - feel free to migrate them to one tag (or even note of you really want to do that, but please keep it readable)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
gabro00 (2018-08-13 09:13:08+00:00): Ezt a módosítást is sikerült elrontani(?). Attól hogy tér, nem lehet sétálóutca?
gabro00 (2018-08-13 09:13:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61586580
Tejes (2018-08-13 10:15:56+00:00): Ha jól emlékszem két poligon volt egymáson, az egyik Magyar Ede tér néven térként, a másik Lófara néven pedestrian areaként. Utóbbit töröltem. Sajnos a wiki nem tesz egyértelmű javaslatot a két tag együttes használatára, de mivel a hely ténylegesen egy TÉR, gondoltam a place=square megfelelőbb kategória neki.

A hangnemet pedig nem igazán értem. Mit sikerült még ezen kívül elrontani? Attól hogy tér, szerintem valóban nem utca, legfeljebb gyalogos övezet.
gabro00 (2018-08-13 10:55:45+00:00): *elrontanom, bocsi a pontatlan fogalmazásért. Itt a másik ilyen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59694608  
Jaja, úgy nézem két poligon volt, az semmiképp nem állta meg a helyét. Arra gondoltam, hogy elrontottam a tér tagelést gyalogos övezetre. De úgy tudom van kint gyalogos övezet tábla a Feketesas utca végén.
Константин Гам (2018-10-08 15:59:55+00:00): Пожалуйста, делая личные наблюдения, не выдумывайте несуществующих (на местности) правил доступа. Спасибо.
rainerU (2018-06-27 10:22:36+00:00): Du hast den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602500011 erfasst. Das ist grundsätzlich gut so. Leider hast du den Weg über das bereits vorhandene Gebäude gelegt. Bitte achte in Zukunft darauf, dass sich Wege und Gebäude nicht schneiden.

Grüße
Rainer
rainerU (2018-06-27 10:14:57+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast den Kiefernweg über die Wendeplatte hinaus als highway=residential verlängert. Sollte das nicht ein highway=footway sein? 

Auf den Luftbildern kann man auch eine Verbindung zum Birkenweg erahnen. Sollte diese Verbindung bestehen, kannst du diese bitte eintragen? Vielleicht hast du ja Ortskenntnisse.

Grüße
Rainer
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-06-29 12:09:37+00:00): Hallo, bedankt voor je toevoegingen! Als je gebouwen toevoegt, gaat dat makkelijker met de achtergrondlaag 'Agiv GRB', dat is preciezer.
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
DD1GJ (2018-06-27 17:34:46+00:00): Die Änderungen bestanden fast nur aus Löschungen und haben erheblichen Schaden verursacht. Daher wurde alles zurückgesetzt.
Something B (2018-09-29 21:05:52+00:00): Не забудьте про https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487395242
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
rainerU (2018-06-27 10:19:43+00:00): Hallo,

du hast Häuser im Kiefernweg neu gezeichnet. Die neuen Umrisse der Häuser sind viel schlechter als die alten. Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen. Du zerstörst damit wertvolle Arbeit anderer OSM-Mitarbeiter. 

Rainer
kgrabanica (2018-06-28 06:49:46+00:00): Hallo,
Meine Intention war es die Karte zu verbessern. Grund für die Änderung war, dass die Häuserumrisse zu groß waren und deshalb kein Fußweg ohne Überschneidung zum Haus eingezeichnet werden konnte. 
Bitte entschuldigen Sie den dadurch entstandenen Aufwand des OSM-Teams.
rainerU (2018-06-28 07:01:09+00:00): Das ist schon ok, deine Beiträge sind nützlich und wertvoll. Aber in so einem Fall ist es besser, die vorhandenen Häuser zu verschieben und eventuell deren Größe verändern. Ich kenne den Online-Editor ID nicht, aber vielleicht gibt es da auch die Möglichkeit, Formen rechtwinklig zu machen.

Ich wünsche weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
TourenbikerFKB (2018-06-28 07:50:11+00:00): @kgrabanica: rechtwinklig machen mit iD ist ganz einfach: Hausumriss markieren und die s-Taste drücken. Es gibt aber noch ein weiteres Problem. Du hast als Hintergrund das Luftbild von bing verwendet, das einen deutlichen Versatz hat. Alle anderen Häuser und die Straßen sind korrekterweise nach maps4bw bzw. ESRI Clarity beta ausgerichtet; das kannst du bei iD auch auswählen (rechte Symbolleiste, Symbol Ebenenstapel)

Das mittlere Haus hast du mit 5 nodes gezeichnet; das macht keinen Sinn. Wenn du eine Kante im Hausumriss zeichnen willst, brauchst du einen weiteren node.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:56:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
yaugenka (2018-07-02 11:09:40+00:00): http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=492131500
Эта жилая зона относится к деревне Свирщизна, поэтом не должна иметь тег place=isolated_dwelling. Этим тегом обозначаем только именованные самостоятельные населенные пункты.
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=499694850
и эта тоже относится к Свирщизне, но и имеет свое название, поэтому обозначается тегом place=neighbourhood
taxi301 (2018-06-28 19:12:13+00:00): To nie będzie secondary tylko primary , DK 11 , już są oznaczenia na znakach
szalona_entropia (2018-06-29 13:23:07+00:00): Zgadza się. Będzie. Dopiero po otwarciu S6 i zmianie przebiegu DK11. Na razie zostaje secondary.
taxi301 (2018-06-30 15:58:26+00:00): Będzie od poniedziałku , znaki już są
taxi301 (2018-06-30 16:00:22+00:00): S6  nie ma z tym nic wspólnego
szalona_entropia (2018-07-02 20:11:17+00:00): Dopiero po otwarciu S6 zostanie zmieniony przebieg DK11 (od węzła Kołobrzeg Wschód przez DW163, nową obwodnicę, ul. Europejską, Żurawią, Solną i Warzelniczą do portu). Oznakowanie na obwodnicy uwzględnia ten docelowy przebieg. Póki co DK11 formalnie zostaje na starym przebiegu przez centrum.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
VlIvYur (2018-06-28 11:29:32+00:00): Привет. Всё бы хорошо, но по улице Морозова некоторые домики не обрели корректного номера дома
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/zU8
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
tuxayo (2018-08-05 16:29:39+00:00): Hello, writing better changeset would help. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
- 
For example the following changeset lead me here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38352707
tuxayo (2018-08-05 16:29:53+00:00): *changeset comments
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-29 03:22:00+00:00): Connecting a sidewalk with a landuse isn't ideal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60211840
marthaleena (2018-06-29 08:26:36+00:00): Thanks for highlighting.I did this by mistake ,removed the connected highway nodes with landuse now  and will be careful.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-21 06:46:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:47:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:47:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
apm-wa (2018-08-31 02:23:07+00:00): Gas station already exists, so am deleting this duplicate.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-29 03:39:58+00:00): Not sure that was really an improvement in geometry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60212866
marthaleena (2018-06-29 07:39:16+00:00): Thanks for highlighting .I was working on fixing the crossing highway on the opposite segment, I simplified geometry by merging them.I changed the geometry and straightened it now.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-06-27 11:49:05+00:00): Hola!
Si us plau, compte amb les edicions. Has unit nodes d'un parc i d'una escola amb una línia de tren.
Salutacions!
Jose Luis Infante (2018-06-27 11:57:41+00:00): Hola,
he eliminado el punto por no contener ninguna información. Supongo que por ser una prueba.
Si quieres hacer pruebas, tienes https://opengeofiction.net para poder editar lo que quieras y familiarizarte con OpenStreetMap.
Un saludo!
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
ToniE (2018-07-20 11:03:03+00:00): Hallo Marco,

ich habe gerade die DE-BY-REG Linien durchgeforstet und bin hier auf die Wanderbahn gestoßen. Der Linienverlauf stimmt mit der Waldbahn 4 über ein (KBS xxx?) 

https://www.laenderbahn.com/waldbahn/fahrplan/regelfahrplan/

https://www.laenderbahn.com/downloads/WBA4_Fahrplan_Gotteszell-Viechtach_WEB.pdf

Soll ich das entsprechend ändern und die KBS-Nummer herausfinden?

Viele Grüße
Toni
marcoSt (2018-07-20 16:42:44+00:00): Servus Toni,
Ja kannst Du machen. Wobei auf der Strecke zwei verschiedene Linien fahren, einmal WBA 4 und diese  historische Linie. Linienverlauf ist aber identisch. Muss man halt 2 verschiedene Relationen herstellen.
ToniE (2018-07-20 17:34:28+00:00): Servus Marco,
yep, habe ich gemacht und noch ein paar andere Dinge.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-27 13:31:36+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za sprawdzenie i poprawienie!
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
kartonage (2018-06-27 15:51:36+00:00): Hi there,

you seem to be importing data from OpenChargeMap. Are you aware that there have been discussions in the past about the problematic license situation with OCM? Has anything changed since then or are you using that data unknowingly of such incompatibilities? From what I can gather, there hasn't been a new discussion since 2015 with no significant licence changes since then. Maybe you can point me to something newer. 

Cheers
Sutioc (2018-06-27 16:08:27+00:00): Hi,
It was my mistake. I was debugging my code which should have used the dev server api06.dev.openstreetmap.org instead of the real database but I didn't pay enough attention this afternoon. If you think there is copyright issue, is there any way to revive the changes I made?
Sutioc (2018-06-27 16:28:12+00:00): So when I acquire the api from OCM I do have 'opendata=true'. According to their website https://openchargemap.org/site/develop/api I guess it is OK. What do you think? Maybe I should include the original source instead of OCM.
archie (2018-06-27 12:55:19+00:00): Axess för allmänheten eller endast för de anställda? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Tobitobu (2018-06-27 13:08:27+00:00): Access för allmänheten. Skyltning från utsidan av huset. Öppettider begränsade till kommunhusets öppettider
archie (2018-06-27 13:53:10+00:00): Jag tänkte mera på access=permissive. access=yes är ju strängt taget defaultvärdet.
Tobitobu (2018-06-27 14:18:31+00:00): Vet inte vad du pratar om tyvärr. Lade in objektet via appen Maps.me. Går inte att välja något om access.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-27 22:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60230311 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of charging stations by Sutioc1 from openchargemap.org due to copyright violation and lack of discussion. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62849 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-12 18:42:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60662298 where the changeset comment is: Revert copyright violation (usage of Bayernatlas)