piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skipper51 (2016-12-31 09:14:26+00:00): Ciao dan980, grazie per i complimenti, purtroppo non sono molto bravo nel mapping, e vorrei diventarlo (forse dovrei studiare un pò di più!). Uso JOSM e so soltanto mettere i sentieri, ora devo vedere come modificare il nome e mettere il tag inglese...non è che puoi darmi una mano indicandomi come si fa? Ad esempio, ho anche difficoltà a mettere i waypoint (ad esempio l'esatta posizione del Cuile Sas Traes)...al limite se mi indichi un link per imparare di più te ne sarei grato. Ritengo invece, (scusa l'immodestia) di essere piuttosto bravo nella conoscenza e uso del GPS sia con il mio Garmin 64s sia con lo smartphone, e a tal proposito avrei anche la traccia dalla grotta Bidighinzos a Monte Gutturgios, ma sono indeciso se mapparla su OSM, perchè il percorso è tosto (più di 400 mt di dislivello dalla grotta Bidighinzos in appena 1,7 Km e ci vogliono più di 2 ore !). Inoltre ci sono difficoltà di orientamento, anche se ho messo degli "omini" di pietra, ma bisogna stare attenti perchè se si sbaglia ci si trova di fronte a pareti non superabili o a salti....non vorrei poi che qualcuno si trovasse in difficoltà e mi sentirei in colpa...tu che ne dici, lo metto lo stesso evidenziando la difficoltà?
Ora devo andare fuori, ma nei prossimi giorni potrei dedicarmi a fare le modifiche sui miei percorsi....fammi sapere se puoi darmi una mano.
Ciao
dan980 (2016-12-31 09:46:23+00:00): Ciao, per aggiungere il nome inglese fai così. In Josm trovi a destra la finestrella con le etichette (se non la vedi, abilitala dal menu Finestre--> Etichette/appartenenze). Da lì puoi aggiungere, modificare e eliminare etichette. Clicca su aggiungi. Come chiave metti name:en . Come valore il nome inglese. Se vuoi mettere un nome in un altra lingua usa name:de per il tedesco, name:sc per il sardo, ecc. Praticamente si mette ""name:suffisso", dove suffisso è il codice della lingua (seconda colonna qui: http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php). Il tag "name" senza suffisso va riservato al nome ufficiale locale. 
Come guida in italiano ti consiglio questa: http://www.msmountain.it/varie/mappa_osm/consigli.html . È molto ben fatta. Poi ci sono le guide  di Mapbox (in inglese) qui : https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/ . Qui la pagina della wiki dedicata all'escursionismo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking .
Il percorso ti consiglio di inserirlo, ovviamente segnalando la difficoltà escursionistica (chiavi sac_scale e trail_visibility). 
Il tuo contributo è preziosissimo, continua così. Se ti serve qualche altra informazione chiedi pure.
skipper51 (2016-12-31 14:43:14+00:00): Grazie dan980, adesso guardo la guida in italiano...per quanto riguarda il tag name:en se ho ben capito mi stai consigliando di mettere qualcosa tipo "path Bidighinzos"? Ho diversi altri percorsi qui in Sardegna fatti da me o da altri con cui faccio escursioni...pian piano vedo di mapparli.
dan980 (2016-12-31 14:45:27+00:00): sì così chi usa la mappa inglese se li ritrova localizzati
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-30 19:53:07+00:00): ohne outer (Aussenring) wird das nix mit dem MP....
Tefexus (2016-12-30 16:56:32+00:00): sorry wrong editing comment
Tefexus (2016-12-30 16:57:11+00:00): sorry wrong editing comment. not maproulette!
trigpoint (2016-12-30 17:11:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I have spotted your edits and they appear a little strange to me.
What are you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help?
Cheers Phil
sorcrosc (2017-01-04 21:05:59+00:00): Non va bene che i poligoni esterni ed interni delle relazioni si tocchino come qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/43.38956/12.54216&layers=N
Puoi cercare di sistemare per favore?
Ciao
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-30 20:27:01+00:00): .... hier wurde die outer line gelöscht....
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-30 20:31:47+00:00): kann man sich schön ansehen auf 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/44789893/
oder 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44789893
Nakaner (2017-12-03 08:54:52+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54291667
Gino-52 (2016-12-31 10:22:56+00:00): Hallo NightCyclist,
Für Deine Änderung musstest Du wahrscheinlich die Freigerichtstraße in Kaichen aufspalten.
Dabei hast Du zwei neue Wege eingetragen. In der Relation für die B45 hast Du die Änderung zwar gemacht, aber bei den Busrelationen ist jetzt eine Lücke.
Bitte in Zukunft den Hinweis von JOSM beachten und alle betroffenen Relationen überprüfen.
Weiterhin frohes Mappen
Gino
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
RicoElectrico (2016-12-31 09:06:20+00:00): Czy maps.me wciąż samo dodaje niepotrzebne name:pl?
user_4493657 (2017-01-01 20:29:21+00:00): Cześć. Tak samo dodaje. Oddając element do OSM i chcąc dodać opis(nazwę obiektu) mam do wyboru dodanie nazwy miejsca w języku polskim i angielskim z możliwością dodania innych języków:).
letihu (2017-03-26 19:19:24+00:00): Warum hat diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129137103/history#map=18/53.46375/10.00295
denn alle tags verloren?
Zartbitter (2017-03-26 20:20:21+00:00): Hmm, keine Ahnung, wie mir das passieren konnte. Danke für's reparieren.
letihu (2017-03-26 20:53:45+00:00): Hab keinen Namen vergeben ;-)
Vielleicht kennst du ihn?
Zartbitter (2017-03-26 20:57:04+00:00): Den hatte ich natürlich auch gleich mitgeschrottet, ist wieder hergestellt ;-)
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Mike Baggaley (2018-08-28 14:51:11+00:00): Hi Philip, do you know whether the bridge at way 49706027 has been repaired?

Cheers,
Mike
Philip Shore (2018-08-28 19:29:21+00:00): Hi Mike,

Sorry, I'm not from that area and it was a one off trip.  It will probably be on a local newspaper website if reopened, have a Google for it.

Regards,
Phil.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2016-12-30 20:09:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use abbrevation on street name. And I see a roundabout in the middle of the Bunchgrass Street.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
chillly (2016-12-30 18:44:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

Thanks for the detail, it is always welcome.

May I suggest that you move the bus stop to the side of the road, rather than being in the middle. This gives people information about which way a bus will go from that stop. If busses stop in both directions, add a stop to both sides.

Cheers,
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
chillly (2016-12-30 19:15:31+00:00): You seem to have deleted the payscale way. 

As a new mapper please don't delete stuff you don't like or understand. Someone put work into creating that.
Jack Pilkington (2016-12-30 22:51:09+00:00): Sorry about that, got a bit carried away. Won't happen again, thank you for raising it with me.
BCNorwich (2016-12-30 19:39:35+00:00): Hi, changed the dyke name to South Oby Dyke.
norfolkbroadsnetwork (2016-12-30 19:42:10+00:00): Ah, great, cheers!
BCNorwich (2016-12-30 20:05:59+00:00): No problem. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at your mapping, made a couple of minor adjustments which I commented on for you to see.
Regards Bernard
norfolkbroadsnetwork (2016-12-30 20:09:28+00:00): Great, thanks. We're intending to add a lot more data specific to Boaters.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
BCNorwich (2016-12-30 19:50:52+00:00): Adjusted tag amenity numbering.
BCNorwich (2016-12-30 19:57:59+00:00): Although the underscore is not incorrect it shows as not right in some tagging checkers. The colon does not present an anomaly and putting the numbers from (no number) 0 upwards keeps features numerically in line.
I think that makes sense!
mueschel (2016-12-31 14:23:41+00:00): Hi,
your source tags have ticks (')  in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you fix this? Actually, there is no need to put these tags, the information is already in the source tag of the changeset itself.

Cheers, Jan
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-31 15:44:51+00:00): I have fixed it now. I also have fixed some others some days ago. Alex
trigpoint (2016-12-31 11:22:18+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions. In the UK we use footway, rather than path, for mapping PROW. I have changed these to footway and added designation=public_footpath. Not sure why we need path at all to be honest, it just confuses new mappers.
The southern path you added is actually a track, again I have changed that and added foot=yes and the designation tag.
Cheers Phil
AndreyKoshelev (2017-02-05 10:35:51+00:00): Хм, опять Калужское шоссе? Тут некоторое время назад решили, что дорога от " Тёщиного языка" и южнее это Варшавское шоссе. Вы уверены, что это Калужское шоссе?
michutik (2017-02-05 11:54:33+00:00): Я езжу по нему уже 42 года, и это всегда было и есть (посмотрите любую карту России) Калужское шоссе.
Takuto (2017-10-20 09:26:42+00:00): Не знаю, какое это шоссе, но в пределах Белоусово это Московская улица. Исправил.
eggie (2017-03-01 09:25:19+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit..
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Hjart (2016-12-31 08:13:56+00:00): Parken omkring Christiansholm er da så vidt jeg kan se offentligt tilgængelig: http://www.gentofte.dk/da/Borger/By-og-milj%C3%B8/Gr%C3%B8nne-omr%C3%A5der/Naturomr%C3%A5der/Christiansholms-Mose
Hjart (2016-12-31 09:32:47+00:00): Ups. jeg tog lidt fejl.
maxolasersquad (2017-01-05 19:52:48+00:00): A building and sidewalk in Southwood where messed up in this changeset. I resolved this in changeset 44934243.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44934243
maxolasersquad (2017-01-05 19:54:37+00:00): This whole area around the lake is a park, not just these sections you have marked.
m_w2016 (2017-01-06 15:37:55+00:00): I'm aware.  I'm new to OSM and I'm just experimenting with it.
maxolasersquad (2017-01-09 18:54:59+00:00): I mapped out the entire park. If you need anything feel free to drop me a line.
MMN-o (2016-12-30 20:51:39+00:00): Perfekt! Tack så mycket.

Jag har cyklat omkring lite och fotat (med bättre och sämre kvalitet) för Mapillary. Det går att visa Mapillary-bilder i iD-editorn (den du använder på webben) och t.ex. på https://www.mapillary.com/app/ - vilket är väldigt hjälpsamt när en ska lägga till visa detaljer .)
MMN-o (2016-12-30 21:27:22+00:00): Jag fixade lite detaljer (adress m.m. på skolan och förskolan) nu också, samt Skärvstensgatan som är den som går utanför!
DD1GJ (2016-12-30 22:33:37+00:00): Hallo ANSOHO, willkommen bei OSM. Du hast Dir viel Mühe mit dem Rundweg der Wasserstellen gemacht, aber den Rundgang technisch völlig falsch eingetragen. Was war Dein Ziel? Für "private Karten" gibt es z.B. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/

Die Funktionsweise von OSM wird ganz gut in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf beschrieben
DUGA (2021-10-19 13:26:36+00:00): That's not a post office. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462850805#map=19/39.15376/-76.89971
Alecs01 (2016-12-31 13:47:35+00:00): Hi, this is already on the map, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4872552 please do not duplicate existing objects
GerdP (2017-08-24 06:09:08+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=indoor on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462857216
I assume you meant highway=footway + indoor=yes ?
How is the way connected to the road network?
acsd (2017-09-05 18:54:18+00:00): fixed
VA00 (2022-06-21 18:31:41+00:00): Nie wygląda na to, że tu można nabrać wody do picia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4581898801

Pytam, bo jutro ma być upał i planuję trasę.
Adam_Piszczek (2022-06-22 21:50:43+00:00): To co był tam kolega?chyba nie,hm to w razie czego proponuję zakupić dobry filtr do wody i skorzystać ze  źrudlanych wód ewentualnie stawy gdyby na trasie brakło wody,a na przyszłość zapas wody ze sobą mieć bo ze sklepami różnie bywa.Poprawione.
VA00 (2022-06-23 17:58:16+00:00): Niestety nie, pomyliliśmy drogę i skręcili wcześniej na Inwałd. Ale teraz jest otagowane OK.
dgitto (2016-12-31 04:52:49+00:00): Ciao, buone feste. L'atahotel Naxos beach resort hotel si estende per tutta l'area su cui hai messo il tag tourism=hotel?
Se è così, dovremmo mettere il nome (e tutti i dati di contatto ecc) su quest'area.
Altrimenti così vedo un hotel senza nome e un palazzo che si chiama "Atahotel Naxos beach resort hotel" ma non è un hotel.
L'imaginaire (2017-01-13 12:16:20+00:00): Poststraatje stond al op de kaart (als toegangsweg, maar misschien wordt dit straatje beter als "kleine openbare weg" getagd). Apart voetpad lijkt me hier niet nodig, of wel?
Sanniu (2017-05-24 10:00:45+00:00): Park paths are not connected to the rest of the map, that make them useless to pedestrian routing, as the person that seems to live in the area, can you add connections to surrounding streets? Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-23 16:07:46+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2551064 ?

Jakie znaczenie ma historic=yes na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366092060  ?
Polarbear (2021-02-23 19:35:55+00:00): Hard to say after four years. It appears to reflect the historic importance of the site, as described in both PL and DE wikipedia pages.
hackthemap (2020-09-13 14:40:43+00:00): Hey Baron Xaver :)
Thank you for your contributions!
What do you mean with tagging the Packstation as "nicht öffentlich"? For which people is the access allowed?
Baron Xaver (2020-09-14 05:06:57+00:00): It means, access only for people, working inside „Industriepark Höchst“.
L'imaginaire (2017-01-13 12:38:38+00:00): Opletten als je bestaande tags wijzigt. "Kleine openbare weg" lijkt me hier beter dan wandelpad, aangezien hier auto's mogen rijden. Ik ga dit in die zin aanpassen, maar reageer gerust indien je niet akkoord bent.
Sanniu (2017-09-07 09:15:11+00:00): Hi. Can you connect paths in גן עמוס דביר to surrounding streets, where appropriate. Not connected they are useless for pedestrian routing.
herdelkuz (2017-09-08 12:17:08+00:00): Hi,
it is done
Sanniu (2017-09-10 13:46:28+00:00): Thanks for making OSM better :)
skquinn (2017-03-31 10:45:23+00:00): Not everything that goes in a circle is a roundabout: way 462670713 is not a roundabout and should not have been tagged as such as it is simply a circle drive in the middle of a residential roadway. Contrast with way 462670700, which is correctly tagged as a roundabout as it is an intersection of multiple roadways.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-31 11:18:18+00:00): Hi rudybyk, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting several ways in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44797172
rudybyk (2017-01-01 01:39:35+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch. I updated this area because there was a lot of mistakes e.g.: there is no any bridge on "mienia" river in "Bykowizna". The nearest bridge is in "Podrudzie". Moreover the roads marked on the map in the forest are ways for fire brigades - closed for public traffic.
RicoElectrico (2017-01-01 02:41:46+00:00): To, że droga jest zamknięta dla ruchu nie znaczy, że można ją kasować. Do tego są tagi określające dostęp, przy czym należy pamiętać też o ruchu pieszym i rowerowym oprócz samochodowego (bo access=no wyklucza wszystko).

here's translation for the OP ;)
The fast that a road is closed for traffic does not mean it can be deleted. For this we use access tags, also keeping in mind pedestrian and bicycle traffic - beside car (because access=no excludes everything).
rudybyk (2017-01-01 10:52:29+00:00): I strongly don't disagree with RicoElectrico. From this point of view roads should be located everywhere. Why? Because people  can cross the river everywhere even if there is no any bridge. Also people without imagination can try to cross marshlands. 
But what will be the effect...? Once again I recommend that you use secure and reliable routes.
RicoElectrico (2017-01-01 11:28:02+00:00): Nie kwestionowałem skasowania mostu jeśli go rzeczywiście nie ma.

Po prostu logika kasowania drogi tylko dlatego że jest niedostępnym dla samochodów jest pokrętna.

Napisz proszę, jak wyglądają drogi które skasowałeś i wg Ciebie są dojazdami pożarowymi. Czy można tamtędy przejść pieszo albo przejechać rowerem? Wybacz, ale nie mam dużej wiedzy w tym temacie, jedyne co wiem, to że przed lasami często są szlabany i samochód nie przejedzie ;)
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-01 11:35:16+00:00): @rudybyk: w OSM obowiązuje zasada "on the ground", która sprowadza się do tego, że jeśli coś istnieje w terenie, powinno również istnieć na mapie. Jeśli istnieje droga leśna, to powinna być ona również na mapie z właściwie dobranymi tagami access=*, motor_vehicle=* foot=*, bicycle=* itp. I sugeruję zmienić edytor, ponieważ przeglądarkowy Potlatch jest ułomny i nierozwijany. Polecam JOSM.
rudybyk (2017-01-01 12:07:48+00:00): Panowie dokonałem zmian z następujących powodów:
- Skasowane drogi należą do lasów państwowych nadleśnictwa mińsk mazowiecki. Są rogatki zabezpieczające wjazd do lasu od drogi asfaltowej. Z tego wniosek ze jest to teren zamkniety dla pojazdow jak quad, 4x4 czy cross.
- Skasowane przeprawy przez rzeke nie istnieją choć oczywiście da się przejechać ją przy niskim stanie wody quadem, 4x4 czy crossem.

Wniosek: Ścieżek leśnych ludzkich i dzikich zwierząt, dróg pożarowych czy kładek z patyków na rzece nie ma sensu zaznaczać. Dlaczego? Równie dobrze las czy rzekę można przejść gdziekolwiek i czy będzie to argument za tym że w tym miejscu ktoś wytyczy na mapach nowa droga? Popatrzcie na mapę - ten teren jest podmokły i przez cały czas w lasach stoi woda. Jest tu od cholery kleszczy i bezsensowne krążenie po leśnych ścieżkach jest co najmniej mało rozważne.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-01 12:34:08+00:00): Jeśli mostu nie ma - zgoda, trzeba go skasować. Jeśli droga istnieje - należy ją nanieść i odpowiednio oznaczyć (jak już pisałem wcześniej). To, że należy ona do nadleśnictwa, nie ma dla OSM żadnego znaczenia.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-01 12:39:43+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian, proszę dokonać zmian z uwzględnieniem uwag zawartych w tej dyskusji.
keithonearth (2016-12-30 23:12:30+00:00): This edit is an improvement over the previous lack of waterways.
maraf24 (2016-12-31 11:37:06+00:00): W tym miejscu nigdy nie było przejścia dla pieszych.
Robin007 (2016-12-31 16:13:39+00:00): Przejście na mapie było naniesione wcześniej (jako punkt). Zatem jeżeli jest to błąd to poza połączaniem trzeba skasować też to naniesione wcześniej przejście.
Robin007 (2016-12-31 16:29:45+00:00): Poprzewiłem.
maraf24 (2017-01-03 15:14:30+00:00): Jako punkt były światła dla samochodów:)
trigpoint (2016-12-31 11:52:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
This addition looks a little odd, looking at bing imagery it does not look like a car park, or accessible. 
What were you intending, the name trailhead also looks odd. That is an American concept.