piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Russ McD (2021-01-25 10:52:42+00:00): Seems like chopping the Tertiary rd was the issue, not the byway.  Careless maybe. Sorry !
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:34:36+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps , Here I used Bing aerial Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98112580
Amegaz (2021-02-16 21:06:09+00:00): Hi osm,
nochmal ich. Dinge die nicht erwartet werden, brauchen auch nicht explizit gemappt werden. 
Viele Grüße
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98112707
Amegaz (2021-02-16 21:04:32+00:00): Hi osm,
wieso hast Du den Fahrradstreifen rechts hier gelöscht?
Viele Grüße
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98112723
achillachill (2021-03-20 12:14:17+00:00): Wo habe ich dass denn gemacht? Ich habe nur crossing:island hinzugefuegt.
Amegaz (2021-02-16 20:38:18+00:00): Hi osm,
die Öffnungszeiten wären auch nicht schlecht. (Einwurzelten)
Viele Grüße
Amegaz
Amegaz (2021-02-16 20:59:49+00:00): Hi osm,
Du hast die Öffnungszeiten überprüft aber nicht geändert. Der Upload Kommentar ist nicht korrekt, oder?
Viele Grüße
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98112734
achillachill (2021-03-20 12:15:32+00:00): Die Oeffnungszeiten waren schon richtig. Mit dem Changeset habe ich check_date:opening_hours hinzugefuegt.
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:34:29+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps , Here I used Bing aerial Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98112922
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:34:13+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps , Here I used Bing aerial Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98113520
dieterdreist (2022-07-06 17:28:35+00:00): Hi Antanicus, in this changeset you have deleted some objects, including the feltrinelli bookshop with the comment "misc fixes to area". Could you please explain what kind of fix was applied here?

Cheers,
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-07-06 17:40:34+00:00): It seems as if you deleted the whole block and then redrew it, but this is frowned upon because typically information is lost. For the same reason, you should not convert polygon POIs to points by deleting the polygons, it leads to data loss (for example the post office in this changeset).
Antanicus (2022-07-07 08:11:49+00:00): Hi dieterdreist, I must have overlooked that POI, by bad. I'll add it back immediately. I'll add back the post office as well.

Re. the deletion of the block, I did so because the previous work was almost impossible to fix: the block outline was overlaid on top of a residential area outline and moving any of the block points made the residential area deform in unexpected ways.
dieterdreist (2022-07-07 08:15:20+00:00): hi, thank you for replying, I forgot to mention that I already restored the Feltrinelli and the post office…

have a good day,
Martin
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:33:58+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps , Here I used Bing aerial Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98113676
indigomc (2021-02-12 13:37:17+00:00): Why did you change an 'amenity=school' tag at node 7769020157 to 'amenity=dojo'?
This is Olavilam Upper Primary School. Now reverted.
user_11418917 (2021-02-25 19:24:27+00:00): Spam removed
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:33:49+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps , Here I used Bing aerial Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98114160
pyrog (2021-01-25 10:59:24+00:00): Oups :

mise à jour de la station de pompage — Charrette-Varennes
Reza_koulivand (2021-01-25 17:13:23+00:00): سلام، این جاده یک طرفست؟؟
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:29:31+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98114907
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:32:51+00:00): Here I used Bing aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98114907
Zachflange (2021-09-30 11:50:20+00:00): Ich wurde kürzlich mit Gravelbike durchgeleitet und der Östliche Pfad war nicht mehr zu erkennen, in dem Fall einfach löschen?
Scout Jens (2021-10-01 11:55:38+00:00): Vielen Dank der Nachfrage! Ich war auf der östlichen Seite bisher nur im Winter unterwegs und war mir letztens (auf der westlichen Seite gegangen) auch nicht mehr so sicher, ob da ein Weg ist. Ich denke, dass man ihn eventuell sogar wirklich löschen kann - im Zweifel als "aufgegeben " markieren.
Scout Jens (2021-10-03 09:50:02+00:00): Ich habe es geändert
IlBano (2021-01-25 21:57:54+00:00): Buonasera susodueto,

il tratto di 200 metri di Via Marignano che va dalla provinciale San Giuliano-Locate Triulzi fino alla strada di accesso all'Abbazia è effettivamente a senso unico in direzione sud ? Se non è cambiato negli ultimi 6 mesi lo ricordavo in senso contrario.

Grazie

IlBano
susodueto (2021-01-26 13:08:27+00:00): si all'altezza del cavalcavia per Cascina Belvedere, venendo da Mezzano, trovi un bel Divieto di Accesso escluso mezzi agricoli. 
Nella foto di qs articolo li vedi vandalizzati
https://www.ilcittadino.it/stories/Cronaca/san-giuliano-in-via-marignano-una-pioggia-di-multe-ma-pochi-incidenti_58172_96/
IlBano (2021-01-26 14:11:34+00:00): Quello ok, ma intendevo dalla parte opposta alla foto dell'articolo. Il solo tratto compreso fra i nodi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/560814358 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/560814352 secondo me aveva un senso unico in direzione nord fino a qualche mese fa.
susodueto (2021-01-26 16:47:36+00:00): Scusa avevo inteso male. Hai perfettamente ragione, il senso unico verso Civesio è verso Nord dalla Provinciale per Locate. Ora ho corretto la Mappa. Grazie !
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:31:12+00:00): Fixed dead-end Onaway's #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98115870
manoj@123 (2021-01-25 11:32:16+00:00): Here I used Bing aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98115870
user_5359 (2021-01-26 20:16:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you the way https://www.osm.org/way/240214993. Please add the name of the river there (and delete you way)
elgolfo (2021-01-25 15:48:11+00:00): Hallo NicoSa,

schau dir mal die Wiki-Seite DE:Gehsteig#Sidewalk_als_eigenst.C3.A4ndiger_Weg[1] an. Du hast z.B. in der Gosener Straße den Gehweg separat gemappt. Dem Gehweg fehlt dann noch 
footway=sidewalk.
Der Way der Gosener Straße hat noch sidewalk=both. Das müsstest du noch ändern auf sidewalk=left und sidewalk:right=separate. Sonst ist der Gehweg doppelt erfasst. Im Wiki steht dazu noch, dass sich beide Methoden nicht gut kombinieren lassen.
Ideal wäre also, wenn du den Weg auf der anderen Seite noch separat mappst –  oder ihn als Teil der Straße lässt.
Außerdem könntest du noch smoothness und surface des Gehweges erfassen, das hilft beim Routen etc.

Viele Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#Sidewalk_als_eigenst.C3.A4ndiger_Weg
footway=sidewalk
!bm (2021-01-26 11:59:23+00:00): Evt helfen auch die (zur Zeit noch in Erarbeitung befindlichen) Empfehlungen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Fu%C3%9Fwege#Mapping_und_Tagging_separat_erfasster_B.C3.BCrgersteige
!bm (2021-01-28 00:04:53+00:00): Hallo PTR-Berlin, 

wieso hast du den node von Aldi gelöscht und einen neuen für denn's hinzugefügt, statt den bestehenden einfach anzupassen?

Selbst falls es sich um unterschiedliche Räumlichkeiten handelt, bzw auch ganz allgemein: Statt Löschen eines leerstehenden Geschäftslokals u.a. POI ist es in den allermeisten Fällen besser, disused:* zu setzen, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: (beachte generell  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix )

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Davon abgesehen ist das Vermischen von contact-Tag-Schemata bzw doppelte Belegung der gleichen Bedeutung nicht sinnvoll:
contact:phone=+49 30 27983810
phone=+49 30 60031272

Ich habe hier jetzt erstmal nichts geändert – bitte um kurze Rückmeldung!

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2021-01-28 00:07:08+00:00): Lustig: in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2376349 ist ein Artikel verlinkt, dass Denns jetzt keinen Apostroph mehr hat, hier aber noch mit eingetragen?
p*b (2021-01-28 07:29:48+00:00): Hallo,
ich mache es kurz: Habe es nicht besser gewusst und es erschien mir so eigentlich ganz vernünftig. Nehme deine Infos aber gern zur Kenntnis. Das mit der Chronik leuchtet natürlich ein. 

Denn's habe ich kopiert, um nicht alles neu eintragen zu müssen (außer tel.). Das mit dem Apostroph hatte ich gelesen, aber der Einheitlichkeit hier nicht berücksichtigt. Sonst müssten alle denns Filialen umbenannt werden.(?)
Ändere es bitte gern so, wie es richtig ist.
Danke und Gruß
!bm (2021-01-28 15:50:47+00:00): Vielen Dank für die zeitnahe Rückmeldung! 

Das mit der Übereinstimmung von brand=* und brand:wiki*... ist natürlich so eine Sache. (Ich bin auch kein besonderer Freund dieser Tags, aber es gibt sie nunmal und für gewisse Dinge wie Handelsketten haben sie durchaus ihre Berechtigung.) Da in diesem Artikel ausgerechnet jene Filiale beschrieben wird, wissen wir also gesichert, dass dort der neue Markenauftritt gilt. (Beachte hierzu die On-the-ground-rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability )

Also nein, ich würde jetzt nicht alle Filialen (automatisiert) umtaggen. ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct )

Entsprechend korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98306175
--besteGrüße!bm
viswa_9999 (2021-02-24 15:23:33+00:00): Hii can i know why you are adding "building=#amm #ammg21 #GC125 #Taiwan" as per OSM wiki pls do refer "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98117531
Gabriele Dri (2021-01-28 20:29:29+00:00): Ciao. Dove hai trovato la denominazione "Quadrivio Lumignacco" che finora non ho mai trovato da nessuna parte? (I secondary_link invece vanno bene)
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-28 21:08:11+00:00): ciao, un mio amico è stato ricoverato al Gervasutta e chiedendo la strada ad un infermiera mi ha detto che per la tangenziale bisognava passare per appunto il quadrivio di Lumignacco, forse più adatto il loc_name?
Gabriele Dri (2021-02-17 19:59:17+00:00): Ciao, scusa per il ritardo ma sono stato un po' impegnato e mi ero dimenticato di risponderti. Io onestamente non ho mai sentito questo nome, né di persona, né sui giornali. Al limite è sempre riportato come "incrocio di via Lumignacco" o "incrocio di via Selvuzzis", quindi per me non è neanche loc_name quello che hai indicato tu
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-20 19:23:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5690796821/history - to nie ma godzin otwarcia :)
kubahahaha (2021-09-20 20:03:31+00:00): Ups. Dzięki za poprawę, rozpędziłem się chyba za bardzo
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-01-25 12:20:32+00:00): Attention, mon GPS n’était pas des plus précis pour ces objets.
FraukeLeo (2021-07-12 10:21:36+00:00): Hi 351293, maxspeed=none an einer Landstraße kaufe ich dir nicht ab :) da gilt zumindest das allgemeine Limit von 100 km/h. Das wird mit maxspeed=100 + source:maxspeed=DE:rural getaggt.
351293 (2021-07-12 12:54:26+00:00): Hi,
nachdem ich das bis jetzt immer so gehandhabt habe, habe ich mich durch Deinen Kommentar jetzt doch dazu genötigt gesehen, mal im Wiki nachzulesen.
So wie ich das lese, ist auch Dein Vorschlag veraltet. Ich denke, ich werde mir diese Straßen, ebenso wie noch ein paar andere mal die Tage vornehmen und mit maxspeed:type=DE:rural versehen.
351293 (2021-07-12 12:54:43+00:00): (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed#Implizite_H.C3.B6chstgeschwindigkeit)
ivanbranco (2021-01-25 15:51:48+00:00): You dragged a highway node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134462123 and changed the Colosseum name to "Silvia's Home": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7140716685
Also try to keep you changesets more local please.
IlBano (2021-01-25 21:03:23+00:00): I'm going to revert changes since this is clearly vandalism.
IlBano (2021-01-25 21:36:10+00:00): Reported issue to DWG

@nfyfe I don't know if you were just playing around or you planned to disrupt things, but here on OSM you should act responsibly as contributing data takes a considerable effort by volunteers. If you'd like to contribute further in a more respectful way I suggest to start here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
Cheers
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-25 22:58:10+00:00): Hi nfyfe,
OpenStreetMap is an open Geo-Database everybody can edit. 
Please keep in mind that all edits are in the live map and being used by many services. 
So, please do not upload any fiction or experiments. Repairing them causes a lot of work for other members of the community.

Kind regards
Tom (on behalf of the Data Working Group)
czubi (2021-01-26 11:29:44+00:00): Hallo laikq,
Du hast Hausnummer 2 eingetragen den node aber in Hausnummer 4 plaziert?
Willst da selbst nochmal draufschauen? Danke
laikq (2021-01-27 08:54:21+00:00): Hi czubi,
Es stimmt, auf der Karte ist es schon ziemlich eindeutig die Hausnummer 4. Ich habe die Information von der Website genommen, weil da steht:
"Betreiber und Kontakt:
Fa. Gerd Reichardt
Otto-Knöpfer-Str. 2
99096 Erfurt"
Vielleicht ist auch die Lösung, das Adressfeld auf Hausnummer 4 umzustellen, und contact:housenumber auf 2 zu setzen?
czubi (2021-01-27 10:14:15+00:00): Hab den Fehler gefunden, in dem HAus sind die HN 3 und 4. Habs korr. Andere Frage, gibts das Postamt dort wirklich? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/290304147 Oder sind das was du eingetragen hast und das Postamt das selbe?
czubi (2021-01-27 10:14:45+00:00): .... HN 2 und 4 muss es richtig heißen...
laikq (2021-01-27 10:55:14+00:00): Ah, ja ich denke es ist mehr oder weniger das selbe, also in den Räumlichkeiten von Packsend ist eine Postfiliale drin.
czubi (2021-01-27 11:02:39+00:00): Ah, ok. Für solche Postannahmen im Einzelhandel ist post_office aber das falsche Tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office)
Hier mal ein Bsp. wie es sein soll https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2949031528
Willst du es mal selbst versuchen es einzubessern? Ich schau dann nochmal drüber.
laikq (2021-01-27 12:08:45+00:00): Hier, ich habe es mal versucht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98228256
czubi (2021-01-27 12:28:33+00:00): Prima. Wer ist post_office:operator? Hermes, Deutsche Post,  DHL.... Wenn mehrere, dann durch Smikolon getrennt.
laikq (2021-01-28 12:00:18+00:00): Hi, ich habe den Tag hinzugefügt und auf Deutsche Post AG gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98294647
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-25 13:05:07+00:00): Iki šiol mes OpenStreetMap vadovavomės tokia logika: jei galima statyti palapines (likti nakvoti), tai - stovyklavietė. Poilsiavietė - kur galima tik pabūti be nakvynės.
syntex (2021-01-25 13:26:22+00:00): *L12, L13
LateNightTone (2021-03-19 18:14:46+00:00): Hi _Madfly, I noticed that you've recently changed roads to tertiary - good work on this overall, but I would question a couple in East Belfast: Mersey Street, Parkgate Avenue, Pim's Avenue and Connsbrook Avenue.

I admit I've used the this route in the past to bypass traffic when in the area, but I've never thought of it as a "major" through-route. The roads (except for Connsbrook Ave perhaps) are all narrow, residential roads where passing can be difficult, and they're certainly not as well travelled as Dee Street, which makes sense as tertiary. Also part of Mersey Street is a 20 limit these days.

How would you feel about these four being reverted to residential?
_Madfly (2021-03-19 23:38:01+00:00): I changed them as they have more traffic than the surrounding streets but change them back if you want
LateNightTone (2021-03-21 19:53:34+00:00): Thanks for the response. Hmm, I've thought a bit more on it I'n not quite so sure of my proposition :-) You're right, relative to surrounding streets they certainly get more traffic.

I think I was mostly driven by the 20mph zone on Mersey Street (I have been routinely tagging 20mph zones under the "living street" definition, but I probably wouldn't apply it here since it's still a through route) - unfortunately it's not clear from Streetview where the 20 zone ends otherwise I'd mark it on.

Meantime, perhaps it's fine as tertiary but with the 20 limit added whenever someone is in the area to review where it starts/ends. I'll just add a fixme note for now.
ququruzka (2021-01-25 12:35:47+00:00): revert 97978167 changeset.

new payment methods will re-added again (because of conflicts).
syntex (2021-01-25 13:26:36+00:00): *L17, L19
user_5359 (2021-01-26 19:43:25+00:00): Hello! Please use addr:city instead of addr:town.
letihu (2021-02-15 19:18:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899870617/history
ist ohne tags wertlos ;-)
letihu (2021-02-15 19:19:18+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899870615/history#map=19/50.98206/9.33140&layers=N
auch
letihu (2021-02-15 19:36:31+00:00): Hier auch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899870616/history
letihu (2021-02-15 19:40:33+00:00): 
Hier auch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899870614/history#map=19/50.98181/9.33115&layers=N
woodpeck (2021-01-26 20:04:00+00:00): Dear user gwq, please do not use "." as a changeset comment. The changeset comment field is for a short textual description of your edits. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
chnav (2021-01-26 08:17:08+00:00): Please stop adding non-official names to the place. Moreover, it is forbidden in OSM to add private information such as peoples' names, phone numbers etc.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-26 12:36:25+00:00): 1) It is perfectly fine to add non-oficial names.

2) Privacy rules are a bit different for publicly known people, especially where known so widely that they result in name changes
chnav (2021-01-26 12:42:34+00:00): 1) No it is not fine. Use loc_name instead. Anyway, most people in Russia never new such name "Putin Palace", so please do not add it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-26 12:49:02+00:00): I added back name:en and name:pl only, as currently these are common names to refer to that building, I admit that I am unsure about name and name:ru so I have not added them back

We have name, official_name and loc_name

name has the most common name (with some bias toward official/non-slang ones), but in cases where official name is basically unused or does not exist at all, it is fine to put common name (that is not officially recognized) into name tag (or name:pl name:en tag)
_gig_ (2021-01-26 13:36:30+00:00): name:lang are the official names, localized for language, and not "folk".
Use the "alt_name" tag if you really want to add something.

However, even in this case, you are using unverifiable data from, sorry, questionable source. Which in no way meets the principle of "ground ot truth"
andrewsh (2021-01-26 13:55:12+00:00): Let me chime in: Mateusz is correct here.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-26 14:03:20+00:00): name:lang are the official names - nope, it is for a common name - that may or may match an official name

official_name:lang is for official names

> However, even in this case, you are using unverifiable data from, sorry, questionable source.

Even if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putin's_Palace is based on lies (as far as I know, it is not) then it is still English name used for that building. Even if it is actually an opulent orphanage or something.
chnav (2021-01-26 14:45:21+00:00): <..as far as I know..>
All you know is based on internet rumors. Putin is not the owner of building and he has denied this accusation. If the building used for residence then should be called "President Residence" or "President Palace". Nobody cares what slang name is used for this place, it is not common nor official name. So please stop this vandalism.
chnav (2021-01-26 14:50:12+00:00): According to you wikipedia link the name is "Residence at Cape Idokopas".
chnav (2021-01-26 14:54:15+00:00): Please translate it to Polish.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-26 15:30:10+00:00): > Putin is not the owner of building and he has denied this accusation.

It is not relevant at all. If such name is used then it is taggable.

>  Nobody cares what slang name is used for this place

Slang names are also taggable in OSM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-26 15:32:18+00:00): > According to you wikipedia link the name is "Residence at Cape Idokopas".

Please read first sentence and the article title "The Residence at Cape Idokopas (Russian: Резиденция на мысе Идокопас), also known as "Putin's Palace" (Дворец Путина),[2][3]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putin's_Palace
 
> Nobody cares

For example I care
chnav (2021-01-26 15:38:02+00:00): Since when you care ? )))
BTW if you care then put it in alt_name:pl and/or alt_name:en
luiswoo (2021-01-27 20:35:17+00:00): @chnav
1) No it is not fine. Use loc_name instead. Anyway, most people in Russia never new such name "Putin Palace", so please do not add it.
Вы правы, большинство населения России знает о "Дворце Путина", а не Putin Palace".  А так достойное заявление, в лучших традициях ольгинских троллей.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-27 21:47:33+00:00): > Use loc_name instead. 

Why? name is for the most common name

> Anyway, most people in Russia never new such name "Putin Palace", so please do not add it. 

It does not matter for English name at all. It matters whatever it is the most common English name for this object.

Similarly, it does not matter at all whatever Polish name is used in Russia, it is enough that it is the most common name used in Poland to refer to this object.
luiswoo (2021-01-27 22:32:00+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny
Сhnav works for Putin's propaganda. It has only one goal - the absence of the words "Putin's Palace" in the tag "name".
luiswoo (2021-01-27 23:16:57+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny 
It would be wise to write a letter to the DWG about censorship name:pl.
langoor (2021-01-28 08:42:49+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny
I'm not pretending I know your local prevalence of this name, but it's doubtful poles think about this place days and nights or even know about it unless they have a particular interest. Polish tourists rather would prefer english wikipedia, since polish page doesn't exist. So using "common" for this name is not favorable in my opinion. For one group it is "common", for another it is not. Anyway it's up to your local community decision.

luiswoo is famous for placing putin's propagandist stigma on everyone who disagree with him. Almost all his posts about certain issues at local Russian forum are politically biased.
luiswoo (2021-01-28 10:45:12+00:00): @langoor
>Almost all his posts about certain issues at local Russian forum are politically biased.<
You forgot to add that these posts were dedicated to the deletion of all data somehow connecting this residence with Putin.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-28 11:11:16+00:00): >  it's doubtful poles think about this place days and nights or even know about it unless they have a particular interest

It is true for many other names that are clearly existing. If you take random village near border (say https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/337575593 ) it will certainly have a Polish name, but will be completely unknown to 99.9%+ people speaking Polish.
Something B (2021-01-28 11:21:33+00:00): @chnav
The only criterion for a name is its existence, period.
langoor (2021-01-28 11:52:30+00:00): @luiswoo
There was no deletion, but inappropriate tags usage. This is the subject of discussion, not the reason labeling opponents.

@Mateusz Konieczny 
I must say that these Polish names are pretty similar to the local ones.