piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
James Hulse (2022-05-03 10:25:57+00:00): Hi there, 
I am currently doing some research on the application of open source datasets (like OSM) within the context of urban planning, specifically active travel development. 

One question that has been frequently posed to us is the reliability of such open source data, especially when it can be altered by almost anybody (with an OSM account, much like Wikepedia).
 
We hypothesised that the active OSM mapping community help to maintain high quality maps thus improving the reliability of such data by reducing the likelyhood of illegitimate/innacurate features remaining within the OSM database. 

To test this, a couple of weeks ago I added these illegitimate stream features to this area (a village I grew up in and know the surroundings of very well) and a much larger northern city. The city features were removed within 12 hours, and these seperate features within 12 days.

Although this area does not recieve the most attention (it is a small village with little traffic at all apart from the occasional walker) these ilegitimate features have been detected within 12 days, suggesting to us that (at least for the UK in 2022) illegitimate/inaccurate features are regulary detected and queried improving the accuracy of these maps. 

Hope this has explained my reasoning, and thank you!
Honey Fombuena (2022-04-27 19:07:29+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution. Just a gentle reminder to always square your buildings before uploading. (Select then press Q) Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120041341
StefanHRT (2022-04-22 12:01:48+00:00): Hallo,
DIe Fahrradstraße war vorher richtig getaggt (gemäß Wiki), die Schilder für die Fahrradstraße sind auch entsprechend hinterlegt somit sind die Anfänge an der Schönhauser Allee und der Prenzlauer Allee noch keine Fahrradstraße ;) Kann man auch gut anhand von Fotos auf Mapillary nachvollziehen (sind u.a. von mir). VG
user_5359 (2022-04-23 08:29:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hSY. I assume you miss the tag building=yes. Short question about your entry: You have entered an key with a hashtag. Is this really description of the object (what is the meaning?) or "only" a label for your action?
tastrax (2022-05-01 11:58:30+00:00): Hi 72fducks - There are currently of few folks cleaning up golf course tagging, predominately this is removing 'name' tagging on fairways, holes, greens and tees which is not generally required.  You are likely to find that recent past edits that you have made will all get updated. It would be good if you could refrain from adding names to these objects into the future. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dtee 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice 
Good Example - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40120491
user_5359 (2022-05-03 08:12:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/435867374. What is the meaning of the tag дфтуы = 3 ?
ashybko_lyft (2022-05-04 07:00:54+00:00): Hi, user_5359

My name is Anna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for paying attention to this. I made a typo in the ‘lanes’ tag and  fixed it in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120525677. I sincerely apologize for this mistake. Thank you for your contribution to the OSM!

Regards,
Anna
Allison P (2022-04-23 00:41:47+00:00): addr:country is usually unnecessary. Additionally, it should use the two letter country code.
mavl (2022-11-23 15:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129286500 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping, the trash data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6558].
Carto'Cité (2022-12-14 15:02:28+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
J'ai supprimé sur ce chemin le bicycle=no qui prétendait que le chemin est interdit aux vélos. Dis-moi si tu as observé un élément qui va dans ce sens.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053928414
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Frans S (2022-04-22 12:54:02+00:00): Hello. 
A remark. You are validating here.
Please solve all the issues which has been shown by the iDeditor Issue triangle before uploading your work.
I invalidate this task since this is not proper validated.
Best regards
user_5359 (2022-05-03 08:15:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/183070198. What is the meaning of the tag Планетарна = вулиця?
Carto'Cité (2022-08-11 15:56:50+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
Je n'ai pas vu d'élément qui montre que la rue Félix Faure serait en Double Sens Cyclable (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80965156). Est-ce que tu as observé une nouvelle signalétique récemment ?
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
JJIglesias (2022-04-22 17:12:37+00:00): Could you please provide the source of your data? the IGM has NO name for such river...
BsRgds
JJ
GPar (2022-04-26 09:45:16+00:00): many tags are wrong. Example this buildings are not hangars: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306117782#map=17/45.45696/9.28477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306117867#map=19/45.45770/9.28351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306114047
mikko_tamura (2022-05-03 08:37:20+00:00): there is a format for putting it time schedule
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120047823
Vivek Dumre (2023-12-07 09:45:42+00:00): Thanks, i will go through it.
SHARCRASH (2022-04-22 12:30:24+00:00): + bicycle access corrected
vojtechzaboril (2022-04-22 12:27:16+00:00): Edit: Metro D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-07 06:20:52+00:00): What is the meaning of display_surface in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9685471657/history ?
MustSen (2022-04-22 12:48:18+00:00): Hatalı yollar düzeltildi. Ekleyebildiğim kadar  su kanalı ekledim. okul pazar yeri eklendi.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Joseph R P (2022-04-23 20:26:14+00:00): Why did you upgrade US 23 to motorway and change the undivided section to one-way?
clay_c (2022-05-04 12:43:29+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,

Why did you change all these segments of service=spur track near Houston to usage=industrial? Nearly all of the tracks you have retagged as usage=industrial are track other than main track. You have tagged a lot of railways wrong and it will take a lot of work to clean up this damage.

And could you be more specific in your changeset comments than "fix railway"? It is not enough to say you have "fixed" something. What did you add, remove or change?

-Clay
HaPe-CZ (2022-05-04 14:22:34+00:00): Hello, is it the main or secondary or military or tourist railway?
clay_c (2022-05-04 14:34:17+00:00): I am not sure what is meant by that sentence.

Here is a spur track where you have removed the service=spur tag in this changeset. The previous tagging was correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41428007
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-04 20:05:23+00:00): Maybe adding usage=industrial is correct, but removal of service=spur is incorrect.

Why you did this?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-04 20:05:42+00:00): Can you repair you damage and restore service=spur that you removed?
HaPe-CZ (2022-05-05 06:52:10+00:00): this is an industrial railway (maybe shorter) but still this is not the whole station
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 08:09:50+00:00): > this is an industrial railway (maybe shorter) but still this is not the whole station

Can you clarify? I am not understanding at all how it is related to removal of valid service=spur
HaPe-CZ (2022-05-05 08:17:50+00:00): I also don't understand why you don't get it.
clay_c (2022-05-05 12:57:41+00:00): The way you are tagging railways in North America is not in accordance with tagging guidelines. This is, what we call in North America, "track other than main track". Please restore the service=* tag to the segments of railway where you have removed it.
HaPe-CZ (2022-05-05 13:44:54+00:00): Bohužel nerozumím vaší poznámce. Trať tak, jak je označena, je označena správně i se jménem po předchozím editorovi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 14:22:31+00:00): "this is industrial railway" is not a valid reason to remove correct service tag

why you removed them?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 14:25:31+00:00): > this is an industrial railway (maybe shorter) but still this is not the whole station

service=spur can apply also in such cases

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dspur
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 14:27:13+00:00): > Relatively short lengths of track, built to give one company or entity access to the main line, normally for freight-only use.

is matching this case, therefore service=spur was correct, therefore removal of service=spur damaged data

please fix it
HaPe-CZ (2022-05-05 15:00:32+00:00): toto není průmyslová dráha? toto je zábavný park nebo co?
woodpeck (2022-05-05 15:48:51+00:00): I have requested that HaPe-CZ communicate in English when mapping in the US, and also fix the damage done here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5977
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 20:48:34+00:00): @HaPe-CZ 

Noone complainst about adding usage=industrial

Problem is with REMOVING service=spur

service=spur does not mark place as an amusement park

In addition, usage=industrial applies not only to spurs but also to some main lines.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 20:56:17+00:00): See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1idC for potentially problematic data (note that service=spur should be added only to spurs, and not added to railway track which are not spurs)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-05 20:58:32+00:00): And in some cases other service tags should be restored, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120183073
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-11 14:38:00+00:00): @HaPe-CZ  Please restore valid service tags you removed

For example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51269872/history
mahdi abedini (2022-04-22 13:23:32+00:00): مسیری رویائی
trigpoint (2022-04-23 21:09:24+00:00): Hi, what is the source of this name.

Cheers Phil
Jacksonville (2022-04-24 17:11:02+00:00): Hi Phil, are you talking about the Urdu name?
trigpoint (2022-04-24 17:50:21+00:00): I am, it seems unlikely that such a small place has a non-local name, that is normally for big cities.
Jacksonville (2022-04-25 05:40:49+00:00): The source for this comes from the name of the game "Bethesda"

https://www.bbc.com/urdu/science/2016/04/160408_bafta_game_awards_rwa

(You can CTRL + F "بتھیسڈا"), but for a lot of the other places, I've been transliterating them based on local sources, and language knowledge.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-04-22 13:36:10+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzAsOTk5XX0%3D&location=38.639608%2C-122.912976%2C17.39
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-22 13:44:03+00:00): Gracias por editar. Siempre que sea posible, también pondría las superficies de las nuevas carreteras :D
user_5359 (2022-04-23 08:51:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are you a solar panel (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar) or are you a company, which sells solar panels (office=solar or office=solar_equipment_supllier)?
Jakka (2022-04-23 05:53:13+00:00): Nom rue et bat. meme ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053954151#map=19/50.66562/4.61657&layers=N
dcapillae (2022-04-22 14:09:11+00:00): Corrección: calle Río Gargaliga.
Leo Slager (2022-04-22 19:15:41+00:00): review:
Lijkt mij prima in orde zo.
user_5359 (2022-05-03 08:21:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1053958857. What is the meaning of the tag planta baja = Aula Marta Biener?
mariotomo (2022-04-25 17:11:21+00:00): hola, cordial bienvenida a OSM. lo siento, pero tuve que deshacer tu primera contribución. como principiante es muy natural hacer errores empezando, pues si tienes interés en OSM te sugiero ponerte en contacto con las comunidades, hay muchísimo por hacer en el mapa de Panamá, y muchas maneras en que un principiante aún sin experiencia puede ayudar.
tux67 (2022-04-23 08:30:56+00:00): Gleiche Anmerkung wie in CS 120060882
was die Hausnummer angeht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120053928
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-23 09:11:36+00:00): Bonjour,
le code postal et la ville ne sont pas à renseigner, ce n'est pas utile.
à distinguer du fait ensuite de l'afficher sur la carte de l'office et là oui, la ville et le code postal seront affichés.

Au plaisir
Vincent
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120054113
Leo Slager (2022-04-22 19:18:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-04-23 13:31:34+00:00): 朋友你好，宣和辅线是长期流传于都市传说中的一个名称，从来没有任何正式场合将其称呼为宣和辅线。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120054671
真空中的球形猫 (2022-04-23 13:33:35+00:00): @快乐的老鼠宝宝
啰嗦啥？直接改就完事了嗷（笑）

我在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120090915 里把名字改回前门副线了
diamondarmorsteve (2024-07-28 19:26:54+00:00): Oh, come on you can do better than that
Cheng-Chi Feng (2022-04-22 14:47:04+00:00): 恢復破壞行為
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-22 15:44:02+00:00): Hello. Do we really have to re-do this excercise each year or two? There is NO abandoned railway there. Most of the area you're drawing this railway is already changed with new streets, houses, areas re-planned. Therefore all of this incorrect data was removed in the past and will be removed now.
4004 (2022-04-23 22:18:39+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
название пляжа и правда Друзьа?
школа яхтинга, пожалуй, не то же самое, что общеобразовательная, тег поменяю.
марина - это не причал, а скорее территория бухты для стоянки и захода лодок. тут вроде просто пирс.
автодром - один аттракцион, вы отметили его как целый парк, плюс еще и убрали теги здания - оно не в здании?
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:33:33+00:00): wrong description: typo source:maxspeed
MxxCon (2022-04-23 03:48:35+00:00): Hello.
When mapping rectangular features you can right click on them and select "make square" (shortcut key "Q"). That will make that feature have right angles, making it look neater(and often more accurate). 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120057591
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 18:20:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route#Water_routes
habi (2022-04-25 10:26:49+00:00): Ciao Muluba

In this changeset you've added several relations tagged with  `iso3=cod`, which is a new and undocumented tag.
Can you explain the reasoning for this?

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS: I was notified of this because of http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
user_5359 (2022-05-03 06:41:07+00:00): Bonjour Muluba,

les lignes suivantes sont une traduction du commentaire de habi en français. Veuillez répondre à la question.

Salutations utilisateur_5359 

Ciao Muluba

Dans ce changeset, vous avez ajouté plusieurs relations étiquetées avec `iso3=cod`, qui est une nouvelle étiquette non documentée.
Pouvez-vous en expliquer le raisonnement ?

Salutations de la Suisse,
habi

PS : J'ai été informé de cette modification grâce à http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm.
無調味堅果 (2022-06-21 18:55:29+00:00): please adjust name:zh-Hant=梅科萊夫
Dimitar155 (2022-04-27 13:28:45+00:00): Здравей Константин,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053993612 пътека ли трябва да бъде? В момента тази линия няма никакви тагове.

Поздрави,
Митко
muzirian (2023-10-09 20:49:27+00:00): please stop importing roads without proper review
ovruni (2022-04-22 23:23:28+00:00): Hola Alessandra Portuguez, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado la etiqueta con clave "Equipamiento", la cual no es una etiqueta que usamos en OSM, donde ya existe leisure, por lo que la he retirado. Puede encontrar una lista de etiquetas que utilizamos en la wiki de OSM [0]. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features
muzirian (2022-07-31 10:20:56+00:00): Hi welcome to osm, have noticed you have been adding imageinary roads with rapid, please only map the areas you clearly know with rapid. also I would recommend using id or josm to get familiar with mapping before using rapid
muzirian (2022-07-31 10:22:06+00:00): also u can join india osm chat on telegram with t.me/osmindia
kartonage (2022-05-17 16:32:54+00:00): Hi,

in Berlin sind die Filialen von HIT als Hit Ullrich bekannt und auch so draußen vermerkt. Bitte _keine_ fix-all Edits. Es entstehen nur Fehler und Ungenauigkeiten.

Bitte korrigieren. Danke.
Eiim (2022-04-22 23:13:11+00:00): Why did you delete ways 709282297 and 330126860? Also, highway=footway + area=yes has some supporters (such as myself) for mapping details of small pedestrian areas (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway). I'm not necessarily opposed to the use of highway=pedestrian, so I'm not going to revert or ask you to, but I'd advise that you ask in the future, as there's no broad consensus in the US or OSM as a whole on this topic afaik.
imamapperguy (2022-04-22 23:23:47+00:00): OSM displays it as an error suggesting that a footway should be a line and not an area. Instead of deleting the area I changed it to pedestrian area because I believe that it warrants keeping on a campus or city area.
Eiim (2022-04-23 00:49:59+00:00): iD's suggestions are not law and, while generally good, don't necessarily represent a global consensus. I'm still confused about ways 709282297 and 330126860 though, I don't see why they should have been deleted.
FJili (2022-04-24 05:59:12+00:00): 您好，欢迎加入OSM
这边看到您编辑的聊城大学使用了Bing的卫星图，依照我的经验Bing在这附近有些许偏差，可以跟周边其他道路特征对照验证，使用esri卫星图可能会好一点，若您就在当地也可以使用GPS设备进行校准

另外建议建筑物可以用Q进行正交化(转角排成直角)
mercutio_john (2022-04-24 06:02:23+00:00): 好的，以后我会参考esri卫星图制作
Eiim (2022-04-22 23:06:47+00:00): What is not:brand:wikidata about?
redd (2022-08-22 20:56:40+00:00): Vielen Dank!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:46:34+00:00): Agregue un nombre a la ubicación.
Skinoku (2022-04-23 16:15:15+00:00): Ciao!
Ho visto che hai apportato alcune modifiche in Aeroporto.
Alcuni building classificati come "hangar" non sono però effettivamente tali.
Provvederò a correggere la classificazione.
Grazie ed a presto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120060450
GPar (2022-04-23 19:43:23+00:00): I confirm that some tags was wrong.  I and Skinoku know very well this airfield. 
Some taxiways cannot be classified in this way, because outside operation area and towing only is permitted. 
 About VOR,  "navigationaid" is deprecated and now is used for visual navigation aids only (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:airmark=beacon).
Just restored...
Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
tux67 (2022-04-23 08:27:21+00:00): Hi,
centershop: im Kreis Viersen sind die Hausnummern bewusst als nodes im Gebäude gemappt und werden in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Kreis regelmäßig aktualisiert. Das verlegen auf den Gebäudeumring ist da kontraproduktiv.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120060882
tux67 (2022-04-23 08:28:42+00:00): p.s: beim Centershop selber wäre ggf. ein Lifecycle präfix besser als löschen, wenn das Gebäude auf absehbare Zeit wieder einen Laden bekommt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120060882
user_5359 (2022-04-22 17:01:32+00:00): I apologise for the inattention to the lack of storage between two operations. 
I remove gpx keys from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053920831 and switch back to /www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119947375 to merge duplicate nodes without saving.
yrtimiD (2025-07-26 16:29:22+00:00): Hi, are you sure that site is a correct type for such relation? And in general, what is the usage for such relation?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-04-23 17:21:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the both values, please?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
sputinyk (2023-01-16 17:59:39+00:00): você colocou o tipo errado nesta via> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129018434/history
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-22 19:15:44+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas - suvesti neteisingi duomenys.