piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-09-16 13:55:06+00:00): Hi,

This is what Turbo Overpass sees:

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126224431&relations=true

You made changes somewhere in Morocco, Somewhere near the Italian border and somewhere in the Czech republic and the good OSM Lord knows why on earth these separate geographical areas had to be edited and saved in the same change set.

PLEASE DON'T DO THAT. Save them separately. Nobody in that box outside of those 3 small distinct areas has need to get this crowbarred into their local CS history view.

If not already in the know, here's a wiki with CS guidelines available in about 14 translation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

MTIA for your consideration on your future mapping endeavours.
woy_cb (2022-09-16 19:45:36+00:00): Hi,
thanks for your feedback.
I was editing in Morocco, but I was by a computer in Czech republic. It was a mistake, that I have set my position to my accual location. Because I have been correcting map errors, some new errors from this position appeared me in the list in editor. So I have corrected them.
For the next time, I will avoid this.
Frans S (2022-09-15 13:25:14+00:00): 
Hello
A remark,  I am a Sr validator and review validated tasks at random.
You missed here a number of issues
Not all buildings squared. (22)
Overlapping buildings, not solved.
Untagged ways, issue with crossing.
Please also solve issues which pops up when you want to upload your mappings.
When you want to do more validation work, take into consideration to jump over to JOSM which has more options to fulfill a validating job. 
Best regards
freeExec (2022-09-16 16:40:29+00:00): Хорошо, а почему ваш музей занимается сбором пожертвований в церкви?
Frans S (2022-09-15 13:27:53+00:00): Hello Again,
This task is not validated as it should be done. 
Issues with crossed buildings and connected nodes not corrected as well as buildings not squared.
Best regards
Sam Wilson (2022-11-10 05:17:07+00:00): Hi Amin! Looks great!

I'm just wondering what source you used for the lot numbers and street names in the South Freo landfill site area? Because as far as I know, none of that is open licensed yet, nor signposted on the ground.
Amin Fozdar (2022-11-29 09:42:33+00:00): Hi Sam, 
Sorry I didn't get to this sooner. ("forgetting", homework, complex answer, etc). 

Put simply, I used Landgate for most of the information, and I also checked it on the City of Fremantle Open Maps Arcgis thing, main site linked here: https://spatialdata-city-fremantle.hub.arcgis.com/  
The one I used linked here: https://publicmaps.fremantle.wa.gov.au/property/ 

Thanks for the praise though, but yeah, I don't know if any of those allow me to use their information. But please don't delete the brownfields, etc. as they are the perfect shape and see for that block
Sam Wilson (2022-12-05 02:03:45+00:00): Don't worry, I'm not going to delete anything (don't have time at the moment). But I'd recommend you remove the copyright data! Especially these lots that are within the brownfield area, they're still many years from development as far as I know, and there's no signage saying where or what they are.

Just keep in mind that most publicly-visible data is *not* actually okay for using in OSM. Unfortunately!
Amin Fozdar (2022-12-05 03:43:57+00:00): Ok thanks, will do!
mcliquid (2022-09-18 15:30:59+00:00): Hi, warum hast du hier ein Stücl der L352 komplett gelöscht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9413609032
mcliquid (2022-09-18 15:33:14+00:00): Ich habe die Straße zumindest behoben, die Bushaltestelle fehlt nach wie vor. 

Hier war das ja bereits das gleiche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126108668

Könntest du bitte etwas besser aufpassen?
mavl (2022-09-16 14:38:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок заменил статусы дорог trunk_link на trunk и статусы primary_link на primary. Я взял на себя смелость вернуть прежние статусы, так как link-статусы как раз и предназначены для обозначения съездов на развязках.
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
cepesko (2023-08-05 15:40:03+00:00): Nasse Strände sollen laut osm wiki aber nicht mit natural=sand getaggt werden! 
OSM wiki: natural=sand should not be used for beaches, i.e. stretches of sand at the coast formed by wave action from the ocean - use natural=beach + surface=sand instead.
Bitte korrigieren.
ruugie (2022-09-15 14:52:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dslurry_tank ?
hfs (2022-09-26 18:40:50+00:00): Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank steht

„Ein Tank oder Behälter ist im Sinne der Kartierung eher kein Gebäude (siehe DE:Key:building), da er keinen Raum beinhaltet, der regelmäßig betreten werden kann. […] Daher sollte die Verwendung von building=* hinterfragt werden.“

Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank ist unter „Possible tagging errors“ auch „building=slurry_tank“ aufgelistet.

Ich bin mir unsicher, ob ich content=slurry hinzufügen sollte? Das kann man vom Luftbild nicht ganz sicher entscheiden, aber ist sicherlich das wahrscheinlichste.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-15 15:37:51+00:00): Jei „miško iškirta“ yra proskyna (dar kiti vadina „kvartaline linija“), tai tada https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline.
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 05:41:19+00:00): Moin!

So ganz werde ich aus diesem Edit nicht schlau. Hat dieses Restaurant jetzt permanent geschlossen?

Viele Grüße!
willmu (2022-09-19 11:14:13+00:00): Das Kvartier Überseestadt hat definitiv zu. Allerdings scheint da schon was Neues eingerichtet zu werden, jedenfalls sind die Fenster verhängt und Baumaterialien und Schuttkontainer stehen da rum.
highflyer74 (2022-09-19 12:11:01+00:00): Moin willmu!

Ich danke dir! Ich habe den POI jetzt per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix getaggt, so wie man es am besten für leerstehende Läden / Restaurants etc. macht. Dadurch können z.B. Apps wie StreetComplete gezielt Nutzer regelmäßig fragen, ob hier bereits wieder etwas neues sein Zuhause gefunden hat.

Ich war irritiert, weil du die Öffnungszeiten auf =closed gesetzt hattest, aber der Rest der alten Daten noch vorhanden war.

Viele Grüße!
marc__marc (2024-10-07 11:46:31+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as vu Iméo Déco ?
Ce magasin est introuvable sur les imageries prises entre l'ajout dans osm et ta modif.
j'ai un gros doute sur le numéro 80 qui est introuvable au cadastre. il n'y a pas d'entrée sans numéro d'après les images mapilary.
Le site web n'existe pas.
un ingénieur avec un nom de déco semble étrange.
J'ai l'impression que c'est un œuf de Pâques (erreur volontaire par Google pour piéger les violations de copyright)
Cordialement,
Marc
Günter-CW (2024-10-09 13:44:48+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
je ne me souviens plus des détails (j`'étais à Rouen seulement un jour il y a 2 ans). Je ne sais si c'était un office ingénieur "Imeo Déco" (ou "Imep Déco"?) ou un magasin.
J'ai l*impréssion que le numéro 80 est correcte (le numéro 78 est adjoint au sud).
Mais je suis sur que j'avais corrigé que des chose que je pouvais regarder moi-meme.
Tu peux bien canceller ce point - moi, je ne peux ni vérifier ni falsifier ce point parce que les mois prochains je ne serais à Rouen.
marc__marc (2024-10-09 16:16:51+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
tu penses donc bien l'avoir vu sur le terrain ?
car j'imagine que le site web "annuaire" renseigné avec quasi aucune info véritable, ce n'était pas le commerçant/ingénieur qui a affiché cela dans son magasin (en fait j'espère pour lui, c'est triste comme site)
j'ai écris à celui qui a ajouté le numéro 80 avant toi.
c'est une étrange histoire
Günter-CW (2024-10-09 16:32:49+00:00): Oui, j'ai vu quelque chose sur le terrain.
Mais je ne suis pas sur si le nom est "Iméo Déco" (comme en OSM) ou bien "Imép Déco" (comme en Google).
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:46:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126227572
Monchinho (2022-09-15 16:11:58+00:00): Ya no es necesaria la revisión. Gracias.
martinst (2022-09-15 18:11:28+00:00): Sollte hier auch noch building=chapel ergänzt werden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094899840
whb (2022-09-15 20:02:04+00:00): Ja, hatte ich vergessen und jetzt gleich nachgeholt.
Danke für den Hinweis!
ivanbranco (2022-10-08 13:46:24+00:00): Ciao Dario, 

i nomi erano corretti prima come da linee guida della community italiana di OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

Ho ripristinato la situazione precedente, buon mapping
Martin Borsje (2023-07-31 20:18:24+00:00): Eebie; je hebt van een aantal mergelgroeven (man_made=adit) natural=cave_entrance gemaakt/toegevoegd. Dit is niet correct. Ondergrondse mergelgroeven zijn geen grotten; ondanks populair taalgebruik en wellicht voor de rendering. Zou je deze actie wille heroverwegen en herstellen?
Eebie (2023-08-03 09:48:17+00:00): Het toevoegen van natural=cave_entrance aan man_made=adit is momenteel de enige mogelijkheid om de mergelgrotten zichtbaar te maken op OSM en afgeleide kaarten. Deze oude ondergrondse groeven, die er uit zien als grotten en ook zo genoemd worden,  onzichtbaar laten op de kaarten wordt als tekortkoming van OpenStreetMap beschouwd. Vandaar de voorlopige pragmatisch workaround.
Martin Borsje (2023-08-04 06:46:11+00:00): H’m, die ‘tekortkoming’ is natuurlijk wel subjectief.  Dit is toch heus 100 % taggen voor de rendering.  Ik begrijp dat je die groeve-ingangen op de kaart wil laten zien.  Je zou rendering in de geëigende kanalen kunnen verzoeken?
JhowieNitnek (2022-10-04 08:36:14+00:00): They did not demolish this building only started renovations on it 
https://www.bruzz.be/politiek/eiken-sneuvelen-voor-renovatiewerken-onthaalcentrum-brussels-parlement-2022-10-04
bxl-forever (2022-10-06 13:55:39+00:00): OK, thanks for the link.  Indeed, the building was removed from UrbisAdm and is hardly visible on latest aerial imagery.  We restored it.
Matteo Calosi (2025-06-14 22:07:33+00:00): Ho percorso oggi il sentiero 928 e segnatura e segnaletica mi sono sembrate buone, probabilmente non sono più giustificati questi tag disused
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-15 17:37:59+00:00): Ok, se per te segni sono buoni, togli pure il disused da disused:osmc:symbol, tuttavia è un sentiero dismesso dal CAI, pertanto disused:operator dovrebbe rimanere.
Ciao e buon mapping.
ivanbranco (2022-09-18 20:17:57+00:00): Hi tsheik, 

welcome to OSM. You requested a review, something is odd here, Zambia census in Italy? Also you just added a point to a way that is likely to be rectangular. What's the purpose of this edit?
DUGA (2024-04-14 04:55:42+00:00): Can you take a look and let me know which one should be kept, grass or wood?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094959048#map=19/41.86926/-75.71718
Unggo99 (2024-04-15 04:53:02+00:00): both look like they are in that area
both could work
eggie (2022-09-16 08:21:08+00:00): Dag stekkerjack.. Ik heb je wijziging doorgestuurd naar een van de OV mappers. Die zal vast wel checken. 
Groet
eggie
Leo Slager (2022-09-19 16:41:17+00:00): Hi stekkerjack,
Dat is prima in orde zo.
De relaties zijn correct verwijderd/aangepast.
De bushaltes en stoppositions worden niet meer gebruikt door andere buslijnen, dus die zijn ook terecht verwijderd.
Mashin (2022-09-15 18:23:15+00:00): Hi, though driveways are more or less those short paved strips that lead from Handel Court to a particular garage/house. This is more of a residential road with a purpose to provide an access to houses.
mc9runner (2022-09-15 18:56:30+00:00): Hi. Fair point. What is the appropriate way to designate this? Handel Ct is one lane drive marked “private drive” that services some houses as it’s own community. The lane is not maintained by the town, but by the homeowner who have access to the drive.
Mashin (2022-09-15 21:01:25+00:00): It seems that wiki suggests using "lane_markings=no". I don't know if "lanes=1" is appropriate in this case. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes)

To denote that someone is maintaining the road and you also have their name you can use "operator=xyz". In some cases some folks also add "access=permissive" tag.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-09-25 15:01:09+00:00): What is Shroomingo Valley?
eggie (2022-09-16 07:03:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
G_P_J (2022-09-21 06:50:46+00:00): Czy na pewno wykopany rów na prywatnej działce jest częścią jeziora Szymon? Moim zdaniem powinien być obrys tej wody dołączony do jeziora.
VA00 (2022-09-21 07:29:37+00:00): Trudno powiedzieć, zwłaszcza że to ponoć samowola. Ma 10m szerokości, nie jest to typowy rów odwadniający czy kanał. Jak Ci się chce, to go odetnij.
eggie (2022-09-16 07:14:07+00:00): Dag Teepe.. Is dit werkelijk een aangegeven ruiterroute. Die routes komen dan ook werkelijk op de ruiterkaart.
Zie https://riding.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/52.1789/5.1858

.. of was dit een probeersel en is dit geen officiële route.  Dan beter de realatie verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
LockOnGuy (2022-09-16 05:57:23+00:00): Why did you change the English name here?     
There is signs in English that says Valley of Peace there.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-23 06:18:54+00:00): I entered Wadi al-Salam from several areas and did not see the signs you mentioned. If there is such a board, add mappilary images for all to see. I also added the Farsi name as a non-original name and registered the English name by researching on the Internet. A pre-existing English name can be a sub-name. The original name is what I added. According to Wiki rules, the name of a place in other languages should not be a translation of the original language, but the original language can be registered with the letters of another language.
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-11-23 03:48:08+00:00): Good day Kadubei,

In this changeset you added spanish translations for many name tags. Please only do this if these name variants are in actual local usage (which is not the case here).

For more details see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Language-specific_names
Niiepce (2022-09-17 22:02:10+00:00): Warum hast du hier den highway Tag geändert? highway=footway und bicycle designated widersprechen sich doch, oder? Das gleiche Thema hatten wir doch erst vor kurzem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125678350
user_9648254 (2022-09-18 04:25:20+00:00): Sorry, Missverständnis.
Ist korrigiert!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-17 23:17:47+00:00): Zachęcam by o tagu construction=* pamiętać ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29326714 )
ivanbranco (2022-09-19 18:02:28+00:00): Hi UsuàrioPar,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10027910917

this node has an invalid place value, could you take a look at it please? Thanks and good mapping :)
Strubbl (2022-09-15 17:01:47+00:00): Sorry, falscher CS Kommentar. Habe das Gebäude mit layer versehen und auf die aktuellen roof:shape Tags aktualisiert
jjkola (2022-09-15 20:50:41+00:00): Tuli monenlaista herjaa tästä  täällä osmcha:n puolella. Onko jokin erityinen syy miksi kaikki pitää ilmaista relaatioilla, eikä perusrakenteilla?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126233626
jjkola (2022-09-15 20:51:35+00:00): Tuli monenlaista herjaa tästä  täällä osmcha:n puolella. Onko jokin erityinen syy miksi kaikki pitää ilmaista relaatioilla, eikä perusrakenteilla?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126233626
str (2022-09-15 20:55:34+00:00): Jopas. Jos tarkemmin katsot, niin kaikkea ei ole ilmaistu multipolygoneina polygonien asemesta: vain niitä, joissa on jaettuja viivoja, jolloin päällekkäisten viivojen määrä vähenee radikaalisti.

Minkälaista herjaa OSMCha antaa näistä (vaatii kirjautumisen)?
jjkola (2022-09-15 21:05:45+00:00): Onko se ongelma jos on useampi polygon samojen pisteiden kautta (kunhan ei ole duplikaatti-pisteitä)?

Herjat ovat:
Deleted a wikidata/wikipedia tag
Invalid tag modification
Invalid key value combination
Feature overlaps with existing features
str (2022-09-15 21:16:52+00:00): Multipolygonit mahdollistavat OSMissa paljon: Esimerkiksi editoinnista tulee hiivatin vaikeaa, jos oikeaa viivaa on mahdotonta löytää päällekkäisyyksien alta.

Jos ajatellaan vaikka kaksi eri landusea erottavaa raja-aitaa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094975715 niin multipolygon on erittäin järkevä ratkaisu. Esimerkkitapaus vastaavasta tilanteesta löytyy osoitteesta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples#Farmland_adjacent_to_forest_and_farmyard_adjacent_to_lake_(Adjacent_multipolygons_and_adjacent_inner_areas) jos ominaisuus ei ole vielä niin tuttu.

"Deleted a wikidata/wikipedia tag" mahtaa johtua siitä että tagi on siirtynyt polygonista multipolygoniin. Muista on vaikea sanoa ilman lisätietoja.
Evandering (2022-09-19 16:12:25+00:00): Hi Felipe_Z,

Welcome to OSM!

Could you share more about why you have changed this motorway to trunk? From what I can see, it meets all the criteria to be motorway.

Best,

Evandering

-----Traducción automática-----

Hola Felipe_Z,

Bienvenido a OSM.

¿Podrías compartir más sobre por qué has cambiado esta motorway a trunk? Por lo que veo, cumple todos los criterios para ser autopista.

Saludos,

Evandering
Felipe_Z (2022-09-19 16:30:20+00:00): Hello Evandering, actually it is a motorway but with Motorway = no bicycle, and this is not true for this way, there’s high road bicycle traffic
Evandering (2022-09-19 19:43:55+00:00): I notice there are cycleways mapped parallel to this road, on the outside of the primary ways. Do people bicycle on the trunk (formerly motorway) part of the road instead of on these cycleways?
Felipe_Z (2022-09-19 20:45:40+00:00): Yes, that’s the case, the cycleways are used only for the people who live nearby, but most of the people bicycle (road bike) on the main road
Felipe_Z (2022-09-19 20:45:41+00:00): Yes, that’s the case, the cycleways are used only for the people who live nearby, but most of the people bicycle (road bike) on the main road
LySioS (2024-03-15 20:30:22+00:00): Bonjour Abn_976,

En mettant à jour les préfectures et sous-préfectures de FRance à partir des données du service public, je remarque qu'il y en a 2 à Mamoudzou dans OSM contre une seule sur l'annuaire du service public.

Est-ce une erreur dans OSM ?
GerdP (2023-05-20 09:15:20+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich bin am 13.5. in der Gegend um Damme unterwegs gewesen. Ich finde auf meinen Fotos von Karten an Knotenpunkten nirgendwo die Knotenpunkt-Route 39-40. Ist die ganz neu?
38446 (2023-05-20 10:18:21+00:00): Bitte mal den Nutzer LAnten direkt anschreiben, von ihm stammt der GPS-Track, den ich nur in die Daten eingepflegt habe.
GerdP (2023-05-20 11:15:49+00:00): OK, danke für die Rückmeldung.
GerdP (2023-05-24 12:14:08+00:00): LAnten hat jetzt bestätigt, dass die Route ein Versehen war. Ist gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136497749
Ropino (2022-11-17 17:29:09+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
maxspeed=5030
--> sounds very fast :)
Vrijheidstraat (32082899)
Thx in advance
yb (aalst) (2022-11-19 11:46:29+00:00): Hi Ropino, that must be a mistake on my part, I wanted to change the speed from 50 to 30 (within the ring of Aalst it is one large zone 30 since August 2021), but I probably forgot to delete the 50. I will fix it now. Thanks for reporting it.
user_2066394 (2022-09-15 22:02:06+00:00): Kein Problem :-)

Beim Reparieren ist auch nochmal Vorsicht geboten, in Harras war die Dopplung bereits  vorab repariert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126227477 , den Knoten können wir also beibehalten. Habe ich kurz wiederhergestellt.

Dopplung Prien wurde erfolgreich behoben.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 18:42:44+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper, Why did you add the Kurdish language in bilingual. Ain't this an Arab neighborhood? Please justify your edit with sources. Regards.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:29:44+00:00): hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Are you sure it is Arab ?
Are you sure ?
It is 100 % Kurdish.
When I tell you : dont edit inside Kirkuk from the USA,  you get angry .
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:30:45+00:00): Just because the words Imam & Qassim are arabicm  you assumed that the dwellers are Arabs.
Why do you become angry when I tell you you are a foreigner ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:33:10+00:00): Who told you that the street signs are in Arabic ?
First give me an evidence then we can talk
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 19:33:43+00:00): No, this is not the fact on the ground that I surveyed. Please provide sources that back your claim. Regards.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:35:54+00:00): how did you survey ?
who convinced you that you have the obsolete right to do survey ?
you think your survey is better than the ground truth ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:37:29+00:00): who were the people that you surveyed ?
how many were they ?
when was the survey ?
how do I know you are not lying ?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 19:37:54+00:00): Please provide a source for your change.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:38:44+00:00): my proof is my age. I was born in Kirkuk and I have never lived out of It.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 19:40:59+00:00): So you say your source is local knowledge? this is weird, because the time I was in this neighborhood during  my visit I saw otherwise of your claim. Can you back your claim with official sources?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:44:03+00:00): Because you are not from Kirkuk
I will teach you a way to know the percentage of any part or neighbourhood in Kirkuk
the way is :   look at the government or formal establishments or facilities 
see their name. For example :  the names of schools. This neighborhood has 100 schools and all are Kurdish national names.
and this neighborhood and few others are the ONLY ones that ISIS couldnt invade in 2016 when the whole Kirkuk fell. You know why ? because it is purely Kurdish and every one fought ISIS.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:45:11+00:00): Come on. How I know you visited this place.
What is the difference between lie and truth?
why do you want me to believe that you have visited this place ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:45:54+00:00): Please discuss by logic not by your personal mythology and family trips
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:48:18+00:00): Even the basic logic will prove that the northern part and the eastern part of Kirkuk are purely kurds very simply you can tell that they are the first entrances from Erbil & Sulaymaniya
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 19:49:20+00:00): These kurdish parts are so pure Kurdish that the two Kurdish political parties were fighting to grip them.