piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:31:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:19:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Carnildo (2016-12-15 09:48:05+00:00): Um, no.

Crown Point may or may not be a state highway; I've got no information on that.  But it is not in any way a secondary highway.  It is a short stub of paved road providing access to a minor park and a pair of dirt roads.
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
freeExec (2016-12-16 09:19:24+00:00): Не нужно удалять старые объекты если вы хотели их подвинуть, надо было подвинуть.
И откуда вы берёте адреса?
map-vl-ru (2016-12-15 08:18:32+00:00): Дома и дороги будем выправлять, не было под что снимок равнять, в каждом квартале своё искажение.
andi9876 (2016-12-16 04:20:19+00:00): no artwork there
westnordost (2017-01-04 12:12:52+00:00): You added an alpine hut here. This is clearly wrong. Can you tell what you meant to add here instead?
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
Warin61 (2018-10-11 01:11:21+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 459779977 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
BCNorwich (2016-12-15 09:30:49+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed the address tags, as there are several post codes and hundreds of numbers on this road also the name was already tagged.
I think there are other roads near/adjoining that have 20mph limits, it would be good if you could survey and map those limits.
Regards
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
ineiev (2016-12-27 21:40:30+00:00): тут есть одна проблемка: за Помарским шоссе есть два здания с адресами в Волжске. не совсем понятно, как с ними быть.
ineiev (2017-01-02 15:51:53+00:00): с Новым годом! есть какие-нибудь соображения?
fserges (2017-01-02 16:22:13+00:00): С Новым годом!

К границам нужно округов относиться как к границам стран - если часть города находится в одной стране а часть города в другой стране, то в какой стране находится город?

Я не местный, поэтому не вдавался в детали граница проходит точно. Местному это намного сподручнее. Но раз задали вопрос то глянул в утверждённый генплан города, граница округа (и города в частности) несколько отлична от отмеченной. Вы отрисуете или мне поправить?
ineiev (2017-01-02 20:17:56+00:00): Если половина моста находится в одной стране, а вторая --- в другой, то мост находится в двух странах, по частям.

Генпланы я, честно говоря, не смотрел; нынешняя граница похожа на то, что прописано в законах "О статусе, границах и составе муниципальных районов..." и "О составе и границах сельских..." (не уверен, что это не я её оттуда срисовал)
http://mari-el.gov.ru/minstroy/pages/npa.aspx

Собственно, вопрос не о границе округа, вопрос о границе города --- с точки зрения почтовых адресов. к слову сказать, не далее как на прошлой неделе обнаружил нестыковку генпланов с аншлагами: на доме https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384362309#map=18/56.16862/46.61564 написано "60 лет СССР" "40", а в генплане (точнее, на карте градостроительного зонирования, http://mari-el.gov.ru/gornomari/vsp/Pages/zemlepolsovanie.aspx) этот участок в Виловатово не входит.

С другой стороны, у меня нет твёрдой уверенности, что эти адреса на Помарском шоссе --- не ошибка. сам я там никогда не был.
fserges (2017-01-07 14:20:15+00:00): Попробовал я уточнить границу ГО, оказалось что генплан не особо пригоден для переноса на карту как есть без трансформации, масштабы явно не соблюдаются. Немного поправил явно выпадающее, в частности промзону в этом районе - по генплану она частично в ГО а частично в районе. Насколько я понимаю именно это было спорным моментом?
ineiev (2017-01-07 14:28:42+00:00): Спасибо.
EdLoach (2016-12-15 13:23:35+00:00): Can you not make changes based on aerial imagery, please? This former farmland has been earmarked for housing, hence the greenfield tags. I'll put them back
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
pavvv (2025-02-26 20:01:54+00:00): Po co te relacje street i associatedStreet?
maraf24 (2025-02-26 21:40:13+00:00): Dawne pomysły na rozwiązanie niektórych problemów.
Można usunąć.
dhoni007 (2019-04-02 13:52:24+00:00): Hi Dewi Sulistioningrum,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458719991, way 679281391, way 459244006, way 459244005, way 679281393 till  way 458593709 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary'. 
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2019-04-04 03:35:14+00:00): Hi Dhoni007, 

The mapping is result from Mapathon Pidie (Missing Maps event) http://tasks.openstreetmap.id/project/178. When I see this task using "Digital Globe Imagery Premium", I agree with you, it's 'tertiary highway'. I think, you can validation the data and change the roads with 'tertiary'. 

Thanks for looking OSM data in Indonesia =)
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
Alecs01 (2016-12-15 19:37:10+00:00): Hi Rafal, we already have an hotel a few meters from there https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3991744051, is this a different one? (not in the middle of the street btw)
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
majkaz (2016-12-15 11:41:58+00:00): Hi and thanks for adding to the map. But I have noticed the additions are not very useful - often "attraction" is not a tag to use alone, and the position on a road is suspect or downright wrong as well. The same for using "community centre" to name villages. Could you try to correct it, or if you are not sure, map it as notes with as much detail as you can? It is important to get the position correct - not where you are standing at the moment, but where the house/shop/etc. really is.
At the moment, it needs another local mapper, because nobody can find out where exactly you wanted to put the points on the map.
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mueschel (2016-12-20 11:58:55+00:00): Hi,
I found these two tags in your edits:
sensor:lanes
sensor:ref_lanes

I think they are wrong and should be
traffic:sensor:lanes
traffic:sensor:ref:lanes

Could you confirm/correct this?
Jan
anonymous_gushdan_mapper (2016-12-16 22:57:07+00:00): This is vandalism. Please revert your changes. Openstreetmap is for existing features you can map, not fantasy.
5m4u9 (2016-12-15 15:45:51+00:00): por fa, no añadir detalles de l lugar en el nombre ni la categoría, sólo nombre.

el resto se puede añadir en la parte final (en mapsme) todo lo que quieras, horarios, email, etc.
Hjart (2016-12-15 11:40:03+00:00): Bemærk venligst at når du via Maps.me angiver navn på et sted er det bedst at vælge "Tilføj et sprog" -> "native for each country". Ellers bliver bliver vi andre nødt til at rette din tilføjelser, for at navnet kan komme til syne på vores almindelige kort.
hønse (2016-12-15 16:58:32+00:00): Hej Hjart. Tak, den mulighed kendte jeg ikke. Ja det er lidt bøvlet med sprog i maps.me, når ens telefon kører på engelsk :)
KKS (2016-12-16 04:50:04+00:00): Знімати теги з доріг непотрібно ;)
Geography Canada (2016-12-25 16:29:02+00:00): "Shashamane" is in English, not Oromo - Shashemene is the name in Oromo.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
sommerluk (2016-12-17 14:20:09+00:00): Salut Témitokpè.

Merci pour ta contribution à OSM. Tu as ajouté beaucoup de points d’interès vers Calavi qui manquait en OSM. Maintenant, la carte est plus détaillé – grace à toi.

Ce groupe de modifications ici me semble contenir des traces GPS. Ces traces GPS ne devrait pas être envoyé comme highway=residential (ce que crée des chemins double avec les chemins déjà existant en OSM), mais plutôt comme trace GPS. On peut les envoyer vers http://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/create mais aussi en JOSM (dans les paramètes de JOSM on peut télécharger des extensions, et l’extension DirectUpload permet d’envoyer des traces directement à partir de JOSM).

Merci pour ta contribution encore et une excellente soirée !
Fabrizio Barbato (2016-12-15 11:22:43+00:00): Ho inserito falesie di arrampicata locali
BCNorwich (2016-12-15 13:08:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me). I will therefore revert (remove) your changeset, reverting means the line can easily be replaced should you be able to show it exists as an on the ground feature.
Regards
BrianWharf (2016-12-15 15:05:26+00:00): Feel free, what I was trying to achieve doesn't seem possible here. Also, you may wish to get somebody to read back your text as some of it seems rather condescending.
trigpoint (2016-12-15 16:23:49+00:00): What were you trying to achieve? Maybe someone can help. OSN is based around tags, so any untagged object will do nothing in OSM.
user_5359 (2016-12-15 20:04:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte noch Geschäftstype (denke office=it), Adresse und auch potentiell Website wäre möglich.
PT-53 (2019-07-11 05:22:03+00:00): Hallo Bottaro,
hier ist noch eine Straße  mit dem wohl zwischenzeitlich falschen Merkmal construction=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378423739/history
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-12 05:55:55+00:00): Hallo Bottaro, ,
Danke für die Bereinigung.
Eine Rückmeldung wäre aber auch noch schön gewesen.
Grüße
Bottaro (2019-07-12 06:36:37+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
sorry, die Rückmeldung hatte ich vergessen.
Ich gelobe Besserung...
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-12 07:08:11+00:00): Super
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Fa7C0N (2017-01-10 06:31:59+00:00): The edits are looking good. but can you please verify the tags you added for the highways based on the wiki "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway".

Because having a motorway inside a Educational Institute seems a bit odd. 

Keep up the good work you are doing in OSM.

Thank you.
BCNorwich (2016-12-21 18:58:18+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sadly your first addition to the OSM database has gone wrong. I have had to revert your changeset that has inadvertently dragged the building outline out of shape. Everything is now back as it was.
Regards
drnoble (2016-12-18 11:28:42+00:00): Please consider reverting the changes that make the large area of railway landuse. I don't think it is appropriate to tag railway tunnels with landuse=railway, especially where there are overlapping uses of the land above
sophiemccallum (2016-12-19 10:12:48+00:00): Thanks for the message - I will revert these changes over the next couple of days! Cheers, Sophie
majkaz (2016-12-15 13:24:53+00:00): As usual...

Could you please stop putting the points on a road? As already noted several times in different changesets and in the much longer message to your account, it brings nothing to the map if the position is off and cannot be corrected by somebody else unless this person has local knowledge. You have either map it correctly or correct it later by yourself. Putting farming area/school/whatever on motorway or primary road will only lead to revert or delete soon or later. 
These edits don't help at all.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
poggie (2016-12-19 10:28:57+00:00): I drove past the site of this 'new development' this morning, and there is nothing but a muddy field with a couple of diggers churning it up. As I understand it we are mapping how things are, not how they might be in the future. Also I'm not sure where the information came from; there is nothing on Bing or OS OpenData - anything else is likely to be copyright. Can I suggest removing this until the houses and roads are actually built and then surveying by GPS?
PS I'm just a mapper too!
Uncle Albert mk (2016-12-20 18:04:29+00:00): This is my first "entry"  I visited the marketing suite, and the sales people (Barratt Homes)  kindly gave me a load of their site maps.  This particular area is their "phase 2A"  I'll be happy to revisit and re map when roads are up and running. Early next year I believe.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
liondog (2017-05-19 09:44:45+00:00): Hallo Noralinda! Bitte halte dich an das korrekte Adressschema (siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen). Hausnummern der Form "19 u. 21" sind unbrauchbar und so wertvoll wie gar keine Hausnummern. Wenn Du das so einträgst, muss es irgendjemand anderes wieder korrigieren.
sommerluk (2016-12-17 09:04:13+00:00): I suppose you do not really mean there is a “African traditional thing” (by the way, the local language is not english, but frensh) in the middle in the road. Likely you mean the “Centre Artisanal de la ville d’Abidjan” that is just aside, but already mapped. As previous questions remained without answer, this time I will revert your changeset directly. Best regards. Sommerluk
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Math1985 (2016-12-15 17:42:30+00:00): Hartelijk dank!
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359