piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-02-02 14:04:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2018-02-02 23:30:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JJIglesias (2018-02-02 20:10:56+00:00): Bonito mapeo.Gracias
GinaroZ (2019-09-30 15:18:07+00:00): I'm guessing this isn't supposed to still be access=no? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384765378/history
tms13 (2019-09-30 18:19:15+00:00): Thanks - it got missed when the Forth Road Bridge re-opened in January 2016.  Good catch; now fixed.
muralito (2018-02-02 16:04:20+00:00): Juan, el landuse=commercial es para areas comerciales en el sentido de parques de servicios, parques logisticos, zonas francas, etc, no para el centro de las localidades.

Para venta al minoreo la etiqueta es landuse=retail, pero creo que tampoco iria a la zona que marcaste. Me parece que la relevancia de tiendas en esa zona habria que marcarla de a uno, local a local, en el supuesto que haya mas viviendas que locales comerciales.
jqngarcia (2018-02-02 16:15:31+00:00): Hola Vicens, En OSM  solo te pueden incluir elementos reales y en esta ubicación no consta ningun embalse, unicamente un parque, procede a cambialro.
gitouche (2018-02-03 18:35:46+00:00): Bonjour W0N45,

J'ai regardé tes 4 changesets, et je ne vois pas de souci particulier. Merci de tes contributions!

Je vois que tu aligne des éléments sur le fond de carte de façon très précise. Bing est une imagerie satellite, qui peut présenter des défauts d'aligmenent. Tu peux obtenir une meilleurs précision en utilisant des fonds de carte "orthophotographiques".

Dans l'éditeur ID, tu peux renseigner dans "Fond de carte" -> "Personnalisé" :

https://proxy-ign.openstreetmap.fr/bdortho/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg

(orthophotographie IGN, partout en France)

http://tms.bordeaux.inria.fr/bdx2016/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg

(orthophotographie Bordeaux Métropole, récente et très précise).

En espérant aider et te souhaitant bonne continuation!
-guiglar
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:25:32+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55997913
zstadler (2018-03-18 14:03:42+00:00): Hello bentzy and welcome to OSM!
.
It looks like this changeset includes data copied from another source.
.
OSM does not accept uploading of copyrighted information without permission of the owner. Did you receive such a permission?
.
Thanks,
Zeev
andygol (2018-02-04 18:57:58+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998000
catdreamer (2018-11-18 01:13:23+00:00): 編輯前請審視前人已有項目，請勿重複編輯。
Nakaner (2018-02-12 08:42:12+00:00): Ich habe die Änderungen soeben wiederhergestellt. Zur Vereinfachung des Reverts des undiskutierten Wiener Adressimports war ein vorübergehender Revert der einfachste Weg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56285995
Владимир К (2018-03-14 07:38:57+00:00): судя по снимку там нет дороги, название неверное. исходя из того, что за вами замечен вандализм и мне лень выяснять есть ли там дорога, удаляю её
Владимир К (2018-03-14 07:39:50+00:00): увидел трек в том месте. нарисую проезд по нему.
eggie (2018-02-02 16:34:17+00:00): Alle info heb ik even verplaatst naar de officiële BAG adresnode die er naast lag.
ebvdijk (2018-02-03 13:18:10+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling! Mijn eerste aanpassing, alle hulp is welkom. Had ik het anders moeten doen?
eggie (2018-02-03 13:29:36+00:00): Het is zaak eerst te zoeken naar de BAG adresnode (kadaster)  Die zijn net als de gebouwen geïmporteerd. Op die adresnode tag je de info gewoon bij. Soms zit zo'n adresnode een beetje verstopt onder andere nodes.
eggie (2018-02-03 13:39:35+00:00): Maar een voorgaande mapper had hier al zelf een adresnode nr 10 gemaakt in 2015. Dus de "fout" was al gemaakt. 
Dit was je edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55998206
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:25:51+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998293
andygol (2018-02-04 18:57:26+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998344
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:26:08+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998425
andygol (2018-02-04 18:56:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998439
andygol (2018-02-04 18:56:12+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998471
andygol (2018-02-04 18:55:53+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998580
andygol (2018-02-04 18:55:30+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55998652
lyctkel (2021-05-14 14:52:13+00:00): Hi su shma,
currently I'm removing the obsolete payment method ep_cash from OSM (used in Europe). I'm surprised to find ep_cash here. Was ep_cash used here and can it be removed or is ep_cash a typo and should be corrected?
Greetings from the Netherlands
lyctkel
naoliv (2018-03-08 13:26:41+00:00): SpiderTon, você apagou vários objetos nessa sua edição, incluindo o nó que representa a cidade.
Se tiver alguma dúvida sobre os dados, você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Constable (2018-02-02 16:02:15+00:00): ciao, in riferimento a questa ciclabile, almeno sul lato che arriva a via 24 maggio, la ciclabile va connessa alla via, se la lasci così chi guarda la mappa e i vari navigatori la interpretano come ciclabile senza uscita, appunto perché non è connessa a nessuna altra strada.
andygol (2018-02-04 18:55:10+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55999172
lakedistrict (2018-02-02 16:06:03+00:00): Thanks for your edits around Newcastle and Gateshead, but it looks like the website address is incomplete on this - could you fix it please? Thanks :)
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:26:36+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55999528
Supaplex (2018-02-02 17:42:47+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55999654
Felipe Alves (2018-02-02 19:32:00+00:00): Oi, Jheff. Tudo bem?

Percebi que tem mapeado alguns locais utilizando área onde já existia o local mapeado como ponto. Nestes casos, pode transferir todas as informações do ponto para a área (e inserir mais, se quiser), e aí pode deletar o ponto. Não tem necessidade de manter ambos, ok?

Quaisquer dúvidas, fico a disposição.

Abs
Henrik PS (2018-06-04 11:35:45+00:00): Desværre er dine ændringer helt forkerte på Damhustorvet. Der har foregået et omfattende ombygningsarbejde på torvet. Jeg prøver at rette op på fejlene.
osmviborg (2018-06-04 13:14:56+00:00): Kan det betale sig ;-) https://www.tv2lorry.dk/artikel/damhustorvet-igen-forsinket-nu-bliver-stort-projekt-udskudt
Hjart (2018-06-04 14:17:28+00:00): Ifølge den artikel skulle torvet være færdigt nu.
osmviborg (2018-06-04 14:56:56+00:00): Ingen officiel indvielse, men åben for trafik  https://www.rnn.dk/2018/05/damhustorvet-naermer-sig-afslutning/
Hernan (2018-02-02 20:12:03+00:00): Te marco los problemas actuales que ya arregle. La plaza la hiciste con una forma irregular, con un nodo agarrado a la via del tren. En name, va el nombre oficial de la plaza. Los nombres van en mayuscula, y en el taller de camiones, te falto poner la etiqueta que marca que es un taller. El landuse=residential, es para zonas urbanas grandes, no un conjunto de pocos edificios. El resto barbaro. MIra para aprender las normas en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina. Saludos
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:26:58+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56000217
eggie (2018-02-02 16:43:59+00:00): Beste KempenNL.. Het onvolledige adres dat je op het themepark hebt gezet komt ook al voor op de adresnode bij de ingang. Kan dat niet beter weg?
andygol (2018-02-04 18:52:10+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56000277
naoliv (2018-02-02 18:30:11+00:00): You have deleted a lot of areas that should be simply marked as "grass".
andygol (2018-02-04 18:51:44+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56000386
utack (2019-07-07 08:51:25+00:00): Hi,  
can you cycle over this path or is it not permitted?  
Thank you
utack (2019-07-07 08:51:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54453199
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-02-06 13:34:30+00:00): Você transofrmou a linha de demarcação em via de carros por favor , mais cuidado.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334687905
andygol (2018-02-04 18:51:20+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56000554
user_5359 (2018-02-02 16:20:47+00:00): correction of the source: esri instead bing
Supaplex (2018-02-02 16:37:39+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56000791
Vintagejhan (2018-02-04 02:31:55+00:00): 感謝您對OSM的付出，這邊有個繪製小小的建議是畫土地利用情況時(例如公園)，盡量不要讓邊界沾黏在既有的道路上，第一是因為之後道路有要編輯之類的會容易影響到公園，第二是其實道路也是有一定的面積，公園的面積並非直接延伸至道路中線上，總之感謝您的付出!  Happy Mapping!
Osm1980 (2018-02-21 20:20:27+00:00): tage https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service 
yadetoon nare
SpaLeo (2018-02-03 19:42:19+00:00): Der Weg ist überflutet und bis zu einer Reparatur Zerstört.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:27:36+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56001189
Myazyk (2018-02-02 22:47:49+00:00): №15 по парній стороні провулка. Так справді є?
olehz (2018-02-02 23:29:02+00:00): це не в мене питай. я лише синхронізував addr:street з відношенням
Humberto_Yances (2018-06-12 13:42:48+00:00): Hola Germán,  con el objeto de mejorar los datos del mapa, hago estas anotaciones sobre el "changeset":

1) puedes agregar un segundo nombre al parque Apolo, no es necesario agregar otro elemento con el nombre secundario https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96520002;
2) La plaza de Santodomingo no es un parque https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110342708 tampoco lo es el "Parque del Ancla", ambos son plazas y puedes crearlas cambiando la etiqueta por esta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian;
3) el Muelle de Los Pegasos no es un shelter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550932647 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter?uselang=es-CO
4) estas edificaciones no pertenecen al Mall Plaza sino a la estación de policía de chambacú https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185397707
Humberto_Yances (2018-06-12 13:25:32+00:00): Hola Germán, que bueno encontrar maperos en mi ciudad.  Puedes mejorar los datos sobre el ingreso al parque usando la etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance en este nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5380968331 en vez de 'leisure=park'+'name:entrada parque esperitu del manglar'.  Agregas el nodo al polígono del parque https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558022315 tal como lo muestra esta imagen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/65/Entrance-tagging.png
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:28:01+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56001508
user_5359 (2018-02-02 19:17:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: A golf course isn't a park and we have a tag for describe a golf course. It is also unusual, to mark both as a point, the property should be marked.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:28:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56001702
Supaplex (2018-02-02 17:30:12+00:00): 請問為何刪除長老教會？還有這一帶都是公寓，並不是平房建築
user_5359 (2018-02-02 19:06:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we have separate key for the house number (addr:housenumber). Don't write the value in the bigin of the street.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-03 17:28:51+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56001930
Supaplex (2018-02-02 17:13:20+00:00): 為什麼要刪除這邊的建築呢？
如形狀不對，請用工具列的工具調整
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
PlaneMad (2018-02-08 23:09:23+00:00): Can you explain why these schools were deleted?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
literan (2018-02-03 11:39:49+00:00): прекратите вносить выдуманные парки. Все будет откачено, покемоны не придут
wambacher (2018-02-03 17:37:29+00:00): Hi,
any reason why you changed a correct admin boundary to a site? i don't know any ;)

hopeing, it was a typing error.

btw: what's about switching from the newbee editor iD to josm?
jlcv19 (2018-02-03 19:35:41+00:00): Hi,
Yes, there is one: the tag name:es was rather a cheesy description in Spanish of the place (something like "excelente playa de arenas negras" it is to say "outstanding beach of black sand") than the actual name of the area, that in Spanish (Moasteiros, the same name as in Portuguese) Same thing happened with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2587867756 Someone (perhaps the same person) had tagged tha place with something like name:es=Asombrosa vista del lago (breathtaking view of the lake) which I think is very annoying when you use a programme that uses the names in Spanish

Don't know how to edit with josm with my browser. Will have a look anyway.
Thanks
wambacher (2018-02-03 19:55:21+00:00): hi,
thanks for your quick reply.

the problem was: you changed type=boundary to type=site. this removed the admin boundary (city/village boundary) from osm.
that has nothing to do with "strange tagging in spanish or portugese"

i think, that was just an error. Never mind.

josm: you can't use josm in your browser. it's a standalone program which has to be installed. needs java runtime too.
see josm.openstreetmap.de

it's 100 x better than potlatch and 1000 x better than iD - it's professional.

please give josm a try, you will like it after some days.

problems? please ask me.

walter
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Supaplex (2018-02-02 18:07:40+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56002744
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_5359 (2018-03-08 06:08:30+00:00): Hallo, bitte verbinde einen neuen Fußweg immer mit den vorhandenen Wegen (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558034668)
freebeer (2018-02-04 13:43:02+00:00): New car park from new Bing, as well as older buildings shifted back into place.  Nearby buildings seen to be off.  Leaving this smaller changeset alone, it aligns to Mapbox.
Scoop268 (2018-02-04 17:22:49+00:00): This was correctly aligned (and a change after you informed me of the alignment issues)
BeKri (2018-02-03 02:20:34+00:00): Uiii,
der Bahnhof Olympiastadion wird wieder angefahren ??? ;-))
Was bewegt Dich denn, den Bahnhof SO darzustellen ?
Ich hätte verstanden, wenn Du den Namen komplett rausnimmst ...
Gruss der BeKri
gnlpfth (2018-02-03 11:13:13+00:00): Servus,
Bewegt hat mich der OSM Wiki. Ich hab das "ehem." aus dem Namen gestrichen weil es eben nicht Namensbestandteil ist, sondern eine Eigenschaft beschreibt, die ja auch aus den Tags hervorgeht (man erkennt auch in Mapnik, dass da nix mehr fährt). Und abgekürzt wird im name Tag sowieso nicht.
Soviel zu meinen Gründen, das letzte Wort überlasse ich dir.
Gruß,
FM