piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CheshireCat07 (2022-03-03 19:57:33+00:00): La bâtisse seule ne sera plus utilisée comme habitation. Plus comme lieu culturel
jcr83 (2022-03-03 20:33:11+00:00): Merci pour ces précisions. Je vous suggère d'ajouter le nom "Villa Simone" et vous laisse mettre à jour les infos lorsque la destination du bâtiment sera bien établie.
Il faudrait aussi tracer le périmètre du parc et ajouter leisure=park (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dpark)
Shipu Innu (2022-03-06 14:18:08+00:00): Cheers LWM,

by pressing the key "Q" you may get perfectly straight buildings, which might by applicable here.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:33:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880836.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880826.
Dawid2849 (2023-12-10 21:37:26+00:00): w BDOT500 są jakieś nowe ścieżki w okolicy ruin zamku, ale nie pokrywają się one z tym, co dodałeś w tej edycji. Czy posiadasz może więcej informacji odnośnie tego, co jest tam aktualnie robione?
Shamazu (2023-12-11 08:10:30+00:00): Budowa zakończona, wieża oficjalnie otwarta. Wychodzi na to, że ścieżki powstały w nieco innych lokalizacjach niż zakładał projekt :)
Dawid2849 (2024-01-04 21:16:07+00:00): Trochę poprawiłem okolicę, choć fajnie by było, gdyby jeszcze ktoś, kto faktycznie był na miejscu to ulepszył.
eggie (2022-03-03 06:44:31+00:00): Dag ocram... Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer.
Is dat hier het geval?.  Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
Het zal anders niet juist routeren voor bv fietsers.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-03 06:59:18+00:00): De uitzondering voor alleen fietsers toegevoegd.  Je 'moet' maar even kijken of het klopt.
MVG
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-03-02 23:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:31:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880801.
CoyKoi (2022-03-02 22:58:04+00:00): Merged adjacent retail areas. Added grass area
abakus_uploader (2022-03-04 00:04:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-03-06 15:29:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have look on the newest version of http://www.osm.org/way/1036677748.
Frans S (2022-04-02 12:23:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are accurate.
Just 1 remark.  It is common use for HOT projects to tag buildings as 'building=yes'
Please tag them accordingly in future mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880618.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880545.
krza (2022-05-25 11:12:23+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz hat einige Gebäude durch das Löschen kompletter ways oder einzelner Eigenschaften zerstört sowie bestehende Eigenschaften teils durch falsche ersetzt (z.B. "terrace" durch "appartments").

Bitte die betroffenen Daten wiederherstellen. Danke.
maxerickson (2022-03-04 02:46:12+00:00): Hi-

The convention for addr:state is the 2 letter postal abbreviation.
Glassman (2022-03-03 17:20:38+00:00): Looks like you accidentally dragged the access_aisle. I corrected it.

#TIP: When editing in different areas - save and upload before moving to the new area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118036963
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-03 07:47:36+00:00): Ciao. Questo sentiero non è stato inserito correttamente. Quando incrocia un'altra strada o un altro sentiero, deve avere un nodo in comune con essi. Questo non avviene ad est di Fabrique e quando incrocia la Strada Comunale Montagna di Vert. A Porcellette sembra che il sentiero "muoia" e non sia possibile congiungersi ad altra viabilità. Inoltre, quando si attraversa un corso d'acqua, o c'è un ponte o c'è un guado. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037225
rox4x4 (2022-03-03 17:09:59+00:00): ciao Andrea grazie della segnalazione, ora dovrebbe essere corretto
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880292.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-04 00:04:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
rmikke (2022-04-01 22:26:17+00:00): Hejka,

czy jesteś ABSOLUTNIE pewien tej https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9550754504/ apteki na środku boiska?
rmikke (2022-04-01 22:29:22+00:00): Moim zdaniem ta apteka znajduje się tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9560902913
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 22:02:12+00:00): It looks like you drew a road over another road. Please don't do this; modify the existing road instead if necessary.

You can try to fix this yourself, but if I don't hear back for a while, I'll just do it myself.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037482
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:59:27+00:00): No need to add this point, the graveyard is already mapped as an area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037537
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:57:29+00:00): Hi, good changeset, but you could copy the tags from that address node onto the building, to which you can also add the restaurant tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037581
hoserab (2022-03-03 00:04:10+00:00): Oops, accidentally copied a previous changeset comment. I corrected "service roads" at the CFB Edmonton airfield to taxiways
Viajero Perdido (2022-03-03 01:01:36+00:00): Hi hoserab.
Are you sure about this?  It was closed as an airfield years ago, now being used for other purposes.  (Wikipedia says, used only for helicopters, and they don't taxi.)  Cheers.  :)
hoserab (2022-03-05 20:26:23+00:00): I've changed the tags to "disused:aeroway=taxiway" instead. Thanks
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:47:52+00:00): Good changeset, but it would be better if you mapped this field as an area. You don't have to put tags on the address nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037631
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:45:47+00:00): Hi,

Anglebrook Golf Club is already mapped as an area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037721
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:37:55+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM! I've been reviewing changesets in the area, and so far yours have been very good. This one is good too, but I just wanted to let you know that you can tag the building directly instead of adding a point/node inside of it. If the building only serves one purpose (e.g. a church), this is preferred. However, what you did still works well. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037776
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:39:38+00:00): Oh, actually, it looks like you didn't put the full name of the church in. If the name is something like "Saint Patrick's Church", you can include the "Church".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118037776
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880215.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880207.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:31:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856631.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856582.
tomhukins (2022-08-17 18:44:33+00:00): Given that the telephone box is no longer used, "disused:amenity=telephone" seems more suitable than "amenity=telephone".  I have fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125031143
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:27:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856565.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:26:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856555.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856542.
SK53 (2022-03-03 02:48:56+00:00): Damn, iDs autocomplete! Thus was adding tags to existingbtooftop solar
look4book (2023-07-31 12:26:35+00:00): Hallo Map-Peter,
in Deiner Aufräumaktion hast Du auch einen etwas älteren Bunker entfernt: w371492130. Ist er nicht wirklich nicht mehr da? Auch wenn er auf Luftbildern nicht zu sehen ist (das macht einen Bunker aus :-) bin ich mir sicher, ihn neulich noch gesehen zu haben. Wenn Du nichts dagegen hast, würde ich ihn wiederherstellen.
Map-Peter (2023-08-01 20:20:30+00:00): Hallo look4book,
 
warum hier diverse military-Dinge entfernt wurden, kannst du hier nachlesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117364478 (ist auch oben im Änderungssatz-Kommentar bereits verlinkt).
 
Vermutlich hat Protoxenus ein Problem damit, wenn du davon etwas wiederherstellst.
 
Gruß Peter
Diacritic (2022-03-04 02:38:29+00:00): Hey Supt. The intersection at Point/Narre Warren-Cranbourne Road has the same problems as we've previously discussed for dual carriageway intersections. I'm resolving a note in the area and have removed the unnessary/overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118038711
Supt_of_Printing (2022-03-04 02:50:16+00:00): Hi Diacritic, I'm afraid we're just going to disagree on some things.
Supt.
Diacritic (2022-03-04 05:34:07+00:00): Supt,

I respect that it is frustrating to have many changeset comments coming to you, and I really appreciate that you have remained civil and responsive in our interactions. I get the sense you feel as though this is a personal disagreement, and I really want to assure it is not.

There are always going to be differences in style, and I have tried to refrain from badgering you about stylistic choices that aren't wrong, even if they aren't my preference.

Unfortunately, modelling intersections to include ways like 1036691022 (a left turn way where there is no slip lane or physical separation) is just, well, wrong. I'm not trying to force a new standard or mapping rule onto you, I'm trying to bring your attention to how your methods differ from what is generally accepted.

You mentioned you get annoyed or disheartened when your changes are reverted. That's not going to stop if you and I simply agree to disagree personally: other mappers will eventually change these intersections back to what is considered "right".

I don't think more changeset comments are going to be productive, but I have raised the topic in the talk-au mailing list, again: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-March/015925.html.

Please, engage with the discussion there with other mappers. We are all bound by the community consensus and some objective, impartial input would be best to resolve this.

Take care,
Dian
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856504.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856501.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-03-03 05:47:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for correcting the address. Is there possibly an open list of the changed addresses and street names?
Jam Mag (2022-03-03 06:23:50+00:00): I don't know of any such list. I went through 911 Administration in Benton County. The woman who helped me said in 12 years of working there, she had not seen another situation like mine.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-03 10:01:28+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`, which is for proper names only. Don't add project names directly. Put them in `description:en=` + `description:zh=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-03 10:03:15+00:00): 2. Don't add irrelevant sources. This may infringe copyright. `source=` on objects is not preferred either.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856488.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-05 02:19:26+00:00): The clubhouse should be tagged as building=yes and golf=clubhouse, not leisure=golf_course.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118040957
Aniz Bajracharya (2022-03-07 02:13:17+00:00): Fixed and noted with thanks.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 07:41:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! There is no need to add a key Coordinates (this information is part of the node data). Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 07:44:17+00:00): Cloud the description your address? Please have look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:addr
user_5239402 (2022-03-03 09:17:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_5239402 (2022-03-03 09:23:20+00:00): General recommendation: changesets should be local.
user_5239402 (2022-03-03 09:24:40+00:00): Please just edit the local.
SekeRob (2022-03-06 22:31:26+00:00): bobertko2,

you're talking to the wall with wheelmap, some sort of editing collective. Trying to communicate with them is like pulling teeth with bare hands.

ciao
holgerd (2022-06-09 19:15:41+00:00): Hi, I’m the co-founder of Wheelmap and responsible for this. Firstly, on behalf of the whole Wheelmap project: Our apologies, we strive to be good OSM community members!

We are aware that large changesets are a problem and working on fixing it. Please find our plans and the status here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329

The reason we did not reply earlier is, that I made one embarrassing mistake: The “wheelmap_visitor” user profile had an outdated e-mail address, so I did not get notifications and I did not notice this. I fixed it now and made sure all changeset comments in the future will be answered by me or our community management team.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-03 09:55:30+00:00): 1. For the n-th time: `name=` is the common name in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. 
2. Descriptive changeset comments please.
Noen (2022-03-03 15:30:49+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Openstreetmap! 
Jeg antar at det ikke ulovlig med både sykkel eller hest på denne stien?
Kanskje upraktisk med en bysykkel, men det er mange terrengsyklister som bruker OSM.
Å legge til forbud «for sikkerhets skyld» er en helt vanlig nybegynnerfeil.
Thorkaas (2022-03-04 06:43:41+00:00): Hei! Takk for kommentar, var mer ment at stien er uegnet for sykkel og hest. Er selv aktiv eMTB syklist, men selvsagt enkelte sykelister som vil klare å ta seg frem her. Jeg har rettet opp feilen nå. Beholder forbud om hest på brua, da det er jeg selv som har bygd den ;-)
Noen (2022-03-04 11:39:13+00:00): Da kan du legge til vanskelighetsgrad for terrengsykkel. Det brukes en skala fra 0 - 6.
Her finner du en forklaring til den:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale#mtb:scale.3D0-6
Da vil vet f.eks Opentripplaner at alt vanskeligere enn 1 er totalt uegnet for en vanlig sykkel.
G_P_J (2022-03-07 14:50:48+00:00): Dodany adres wskazuje na budynek dworca Olsztyn Główny, a to jest Olsztyn Zachodni.
Warin61 (2022-08-26 02:47:28+00:00): Hi
Cricket nets with long jumps at the same location ??? See way 1036761312
user_5359 (2022-03-08 09:15:46+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9547183962. What is the meaning of the tag summitcross = yes ?
PhilLL (2022-03-08 09:48:07+00:00): Thank you for your message, I just changed my mistake on "Summitcross" instead of "Summit: Cross". Good day to you
sorcrosc (2022-03-03 22:37:11+00:00): Interesting. Thank you ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-03-03 08:53:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  In OSM taggen we in principe bij op de bestaande adresnode. 
Ik heb de info verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mordechai23 (2022-03-03 08:30:40+00:00): ooo, super że się tym zająłeś! zobacz jeszcze NZOZ
Yunkers (2022-03-03 19:17:31+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki!
eggie (2022-03-03 08:56:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback .. In principe hoef je geen adressen toe te voegen, maar taggen we in OSM bij op de bestaande adresnodes. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-03 09:02:31+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
format openingstijden aangepast
Gr eggie
MulderKelvin (2022-03-04 07:08:58+00:00): Thanks, heel fijn 👌🏼
eggie (2022-03-03 09:20:04+00:00): Dag Sjoerd.. 
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118046868

access=destination stond al vermeld. Dat geldt dus al voor iedereen. 
Nu heb je toegevoegd motor_vehicle=destination. 

Voor wie geldt het nu?  
Wandelaars? Fietsers? of alleen motorvoertuigen?
Welk bord staat er vooraan?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-03 09:29:43+00:00): Omdat drie wandelroutes door access=destination waren onderbroken heb ik access=destination verwijderd.
motor_vehicle heb ik aangepast naar motorcar=destination, maar het is de vraag of er daadwerkelijk een dergelijk bord staat.
De Bakenbergseweg naar het westen is inderdaad motorcar=no of destination. 
Up to you verder.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-03 09:35:35+00:00): motorcar nog even veranderd in motor_vehicle=destination muv moped en mofa.
Even gespiekt in straatkijk. 
Het routeert nu weer voor wandelaars.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-03 09:36:28+00:00): en tweewielers
SjoerdPerfors (2022-03-03 09:43:19+00:00): Dank je wel Eggie, ik had feedback gekregen om het via motor_vehicle te doen en was even in de veronderstelling dat acces:destination al was verwijderd maar dat was dus niet het geval...

Voor mij goed. Het bord wat aan het  begin van de Bakenbergseweg staat is verboden voor auto en motor met uitzondering bezoekers/overnachtingen van groot warnsborn (hotel / restaurant)
eggie (2022-03-03 10:06:30+00:00): Oke.. Hier is het goed nu.

Best lastig al die accesstagging.

Ik heb ook even teruggekeken bij je voorgaande tagging.
Eigenlijk is access=no in combinatie met bv foot en bicycle=yes  bijna altijd fout.
Tag alleen de categorieën die er niet mogen komen.
Roermond is lastig omdat er veel is veranderd.  De bebording is niet altijd consequent.
Er staat al snel een C1 bord
, maar de uitzonderingen ontbreken.
Nu  vehicle=destination in de Koolstraat, Er staat een C1 bord met onderbord bestemmingsverkeer
Maar wellicht is dat nu al weer anders.
foot=yes is default.
Kijk ook even in Duitsland.. Daar staat een bosweg ook op access=no
Zou best kunnen als er een verbodsbord staat voor iedereen. 
Hoe zit het met de wandelaars of fietsers? 
Je moet maar eens kijken? 
Mapse,
eggie
Tilia_J (2022-03-03 12:05:12+00:00): Zoals ik de access in dit stuk van Warnsborn ken wordt het lastig taggen:

motorcar / motorcycle / moped / mofa / tourist_bus = customers

hgv/goods=delivery

Voor de bewoonde bebouwing geldt motor_vehicle=destination (huisnrs 303 - 309)

Overige bospaden:
access=no@(sunset-sunrise)
motor_vehicle=forestry
foot=permissive
bicycle=permissive

Bovenstaande staat overigens los van de bebording aangezien die misleidend / verwarrend zijn.
skyper (2022-03-04 03:42:59+00:00): Hallo sfancy
Bitte verwende zum Aufteilen von Linien welche Mitglieder in Route-Relationen sind, JOSM und nicht iD.
iD hat leider immer noch Bugs und zerstört die Reihenfolge bei Schleifen, siehe https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-bodo-Analysis.html#11193902 und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74822.
Hab es korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118076910
voschix (2022-07-31 14:42:20+00:00): Hi.
You put psv=no on way 28014851.
I would say that is not correct, as taxies cold pick up and set down customers in that road. 
Volker
BracketC (2022-08-10 09:06:26+00:00): Hi Volker,
My error, I'll watch out for that in future- I've corrected it I believe.
Chris
Nesim (2022-03-06 21:27:07+00:00): Incorrect operation
ToniE (2022-03-03 10:08:18+00:00): Thanks, I noticed and fixed that for the Train-Relations (using PTNA ptna.openstreetmap.de) but forgot to fix the stop_areas as well.

Regards
Toni
azakh-world (2022-03-03 10:19:02+00:00): Yeah, Zverik's validator is also alive and well :)
Best regards,
Alexey
user_2066394 (2022-10-10 15:57:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127307284
eggie (2022-03-04 06:58:47+00:00): Dag Essex Boy..

Tip. Kijk nooit naar de vorm van de daken. Dat is niet de plek waar de gebouwen staan.
Wanneer je gebouwen opsplitst heb je kans dat bij periodieke import gebouwen op elkaar liggen. Beter niet op deze manier veranderen.
Je kunt wel een vlak building:part=  op de delen leggen en daar de info op zetten. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-04 07:33:52+00:00): BAG data hersteld...  Jouw gegevens staan nu op de building:parts
Gr eggie