piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dadavid (2022-02-08 14:59:44+00:00): das alte Tagging als amenity=public_bath war doch eigentlich gut, auch wenn leisure=swimming_area hier vermutlich nicht richtig war. 
Bist du sicher, dass leisure=sports_centre, also ein Sportzzentrum, hier besser passt?
VG David
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-02-04 03:42:36+00:00): amenity задублировалось, нужно объединить:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8241879148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62166585
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 07:27:28+00:00): Hello!

You used
office=graphic_designer
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2653553770/history

Have you maybe meant
office=graphic_design
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Tilia_J (2022-02-03 15:49:39+00:00): Was de conditional al niet sluitend door de reeds aanwezige access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise) ? Dit lijkt wat dubbelop
smootheFiets (2022-02-03 16:51:04+00:00): Als ik het goed begrijp, was het niet sluitend, want:
"A restriction having a more specific transportation mode overrules a less specific transportation mode." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Evaluation_of_conflicting_restrictions )

Dus, de access:conditional wordt overruled voor fietsers, voetgangers en motorvoertuigen :)

In feite zou dus access:conditional helemaal weg kunnen, want het levert niks op. Daar was ik net niet radicaal genoeg voor.
Tilia_J (2022-02-03 19:48:31+00:00): Ik snap je interpretatie, maar volgens mij gaat die regel niet op in deze situatie:

Immers is de "access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)" een algemene restrictie voor de nachtelijke uren die niet conflicteert / interfereert met de specifieke openstelling overdags.

De door jou aangehaalde regel zou in het volgende voorbeeld opgaan als de algemene restrictie "access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)" in de wintermaanden wél (gedeeltelijk) conflicteert met de specifieke openstelling "permissive @ (06:00-19:00)"
smootheFiets (2022-02-04 13:05:54+00:00): Inderdaad, zo kan je het ook begrijpen. Ook al vermoed ik dat jij denkt als een mens. Computers (lees: routers), vermoed ik, denken eerder zoals ik het schreef. Maar dat weet ik dus niet precies.

Dat zou eigenlijk een prima vraag voor het forum zijn. En/of voor een online tool zoals https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ Dat laatste ondersteund helaas geen access en weet dus niet welke access welke overruled.  

Weet jij of zo'n tool al bestaat? Alle nodige code zou eigenlijk al moeten bestaan. Het is dan 'maar' een kwestie van alles in elkaar breien.
Tilia_J (2022-02-06 19:56:53+00:00): Ik heb de wiki nog eens goed doorgelezen alsook de mij bekende validators bekeken.

De door jou geciteerde zin over transport mode hierarchy zou mijns inziens alleen van invloed zijn als de conditional restrictions ten opzichte van elkaar verschillen of conflicteren.

Alles draait om de vraag: Zal een lagere transport mode condition de hogere volledig overrulen of enkel dáár waar ze conflicteren?

Ík heb hier iig vooralsnog geen antwoord op kunnen vinden.

Ik heb eerder al tevergeefs gezocht naar conditional access validator-tools. Evenmin wordt de transport mode hierarchy in OSMOSE of JOSM validators (en heb ik al ondervonden dat sommige validators elkaar tegenspreken)

Jij bent inmiddels de vierde OSM-editor die mijn conditional tagging aanpast en altijd stel ik dan de vraag "waarom"?. Ik krijg dan de meest uiteenlopende interpretaties die overigens allemaal hout snijden.

Ik neig inmiddels naar de veilige oplossing om er van uit te gaan dat een specifieker transportmiddel idd volledig de algemene zal overrulen.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:52:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-03-17 15:43:06+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez changé la forme de la Tour Eiffel. J’imagine que c’est une erreur. Est-ce que vous pouvez me confirmer que ce n’est pas volontaire ? Merci d’avance.
cquest (2022-03-17 15:47:29+00:00): Revrt partiel fait: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118600156
Frans S (2022-04-04 11:46:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116969244
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 116634231, 116634515, 116634714, 116635372, 116635515, 116636297, 116636989, 116637139, 116637480, 116638128, 116675498, 116676657, 116676810, 116677331, 116677432, 116677677, 116677757, 116679642, 116679672, 116679772, 116680258, 116681464, 116681734, 116720082, 116720121, 116720964, 116724182, 116759392, 116760179, 116760467, 116760541, 116780541, 116780595, 116781121, 116781843, 116782992, 116783259, 116783826, 116783934, 116784065, 116785121, 116785147, 116785190, 116785314, 116785466, 116785891, 116786229, 116786467, 116786636, 116786838, 116786857, 116788083, 116788230, 116823948, 116825083, 116825877, 116826336, 116846821, 116879120, 116879238, 116879418, 116879569, 116880044, 116880344, 116880530, 116880889, 116881517, 116881594, 116881675, 116881755, 116881923, 116881970, 116882079, 116882448, 116882693, 116882933, 116883007, 116883222, 116883358, 116883470, 116883572, 116883656, 116883770, 116883979, 116884072, 116884225, 116884341, 116884555, 116884733, 116884858, 116930919, 116931118, 116931269, 116931416.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Rogoyski (2022-05-30 18:53:21+00:00): Św. Barbay 4/6/8 mają w EGiB funkcję mieszkaniową, na jakiej podstawie więc zmieniłeś tę funkcję na commercial i retail (zwłaszcza to drugie podejrzane). Uwzględniaj proszę w źródłach rzeczywiste źródła zmian, a nie tylko listę podkładów otwartych w edytorze.
syntex (2022-05-30 19:16:55+00:00): Okej, nie upieram się
user_5359 (2022-02-04 10:14:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1027429594? What is the meaning of ba = retaining_wall?
vmicho (2022-02-13 08:50:49+00:00): Hi.
Well it is the elevated barrier that keeps the garden inside, from collapsing to the road.
vmicho (2022-02-13 08:51:27+00:00): And you also cannot pass through it
user_5359 (2022-02-13 09:19:29+00:00): You typo was modified by Marek-M see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027429594/history
vmicho (2022-02-13 09:45:45+00:00): aaaah that one :D
Looks like it did not autocomplete on time ^.^  When you time "ba" it normally completes to "barrier", unless you are too fast.
eserte (2022-02-03 18:57:27+00:00): Hallo pan_kisiel, die Änderung bzgl. der Radwege in der Edisonstraße scheint falsch zu sein --- der alte Zustand war doch eigentlich richtig?
eserte (2022-02-03 18:57:50+00:00): Siehe auch: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/eserte?lat=52.4644824&lng=13.5135646&z=16.53851892301874&mapStyle=Mapillary+streets&panos=true&menu=false&dateFrom=2021-01-01&pKey=578015810170253&focus=photo&x=0.8538357432084037&y=0.47544496325961627&zoom=0
pan_kisiel (2022-02-03 19:56:56+00:00): ja, stimmt. gut aufgepasst. da war wohl die kartendrehung nicht in ordnung. im grunde ist es spiegelverkehrt... ich habe es in der app rückgängig gemacht.
Snaiperis (2022-02-09 23:27:38+00:00): Please, revert. Bridge has definitely been completed 40 years ago and now is  dismantled because of reconstruction until early summer of 2023.
ygcgjp5 (2022-02-10 08:14:19+00:00): revertinau kad būtų greičiau
woodpeck (2022-02-03 22:12:08+00:00): Hallo gemax, was hat es mit dieser Vielzahl einzelner Edits an der Wasserrettung Bischofshofen auf sich? Wieso hast Du sie schliesslich doppelt eingetragen? Einer der beiden Nodes sollte wieder gelöscht werden. Das "ref"-Tag ist auch nicht dafür da, Namen einzutragen. Falls Deine vielen Edits ein Versuch waren, irgendwie den "Namen auf die Karte" zu bringen - das geht so nicht, eine "ambulance_station" wird auf der Standardkarte nicht eingetragen. Vielleicht ist umap.openstreetmap.de für Dich eine Option, um gewünschte Orte auf der Karte hervorzuheben.
Frans S (2022-02-04 11:11:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please do not forget to square the rectangular buildings you map.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2022-02-03 21:20:47+00:00): Dag Roel.. Lijkt me okay.
De Gouden Leeuw heeft alleen geen verbinding met het Gouden Leeuwplein. 
Die nodeverbinding lijkt vast, maar ligt los. Zit wel aan het vlak vast, maar niet aan de ingetekende pedestrian (lijnelement)
Bij der Keizershof idem, maar daar ontbreekt het lijnelement. 
Draai de validator even... 
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116970657
Gr eggie
mmd (2022-05-04 18:06:03+00:00): I'm wondering why you keep adding circles like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026778864 to the map. According to this blog post, you seem to have added similar data all over the world: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E7%90%89%E7%92%83%E7%99%BE%E5%90%88/diary/399110

Please make sure you're removing those circles before uploading your data to the database.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 115525296, 115533351, 115535954, 115565234, 115628064, 115635250, 115636440, 115637117, 115692473, 115694571, 115695558, 115734985, 115735673, 115736765, 115737885, 115738302, 115776102, 115777314, 115817241, 115853463, 115901083, 115928642, 115928769, 115970432, 115971697, 116047069, 116047703, 116050485, 116052019, 116054124, 116054432, 116055258, 116055424, 116055496, 116063114, 116133267, 116182303, 116202365, 116202672, 116203080, 116203232, 116207232, 116207715, 116230401, 116232961, 116233382, 116235073, 116235403, 116236595, 116271400, 116271460, 116272916, 116315686, 116315776, 116324803, 116327701, 116327710, 116343941, 116413443, 116414464, 116415089, 116417650, 116419746, 116421018, 116423706, 116426034, 116453954, 116489316, 116540857, 116542753, 116543747, 116546542, 116548096, 116549963, 116553894, 116571553, 116606219, 116608653, 116617540, 116619941, 116621562, 116660391, 116661709, 116663611, 116664266, 116665699, 116666832, 116668020, 116669671, 116672204, 116677003, 116764276, 116765249, 116767303, 116767783, 116768044, 116769454, 116769789, 116770612, 116771144, 116772037, 116772246, 116774303, 116775385, 116776157, 116777370, 116779540, 116780772, 116781577, 116794484, 116795327, 116801323, 116801467, 116803112, 116803132, 116805615, 116806627, 116808557, 116808795, 116811392, 116812360, 116845587, 116848539, 116849379, 116855230, 116860016, 116861486, 116861775, 116864058, 116907810, 116909943, 116910628, 116911687, 116913723, 116917799, 116918328, 116919093, 116922008, 116940708, 116941106, 116941222, 116941552, 116941744, 116942158, 116943097, 116943372, 116944123.
Jakka (2022-02-03 17:30:44+00:00): Er zit nog een foutje in uit het verleden. highway=residential en service=* gaan niet samen moet highway=service en ...
charl3s (2022-02-03 17:14:01+00:00): Cześć. Jak robisz importy to mógłbyś przy okazji poprawiać błędne tracki. Pozdrawiam!
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ZLima12 (2022-03-26 04:04:02+00:00): Hi,

First of all, it was fine as it was. Adding curves where there isn't any just to satisfy your QA tool isn't in the best interest of the map.

Second, why did you delete the turn restriction? Now, routing will allow U-Turns at this intersection.

Reverting.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116971729
ZLima12 (2022-03-26 04:06:31+00:00): I see now that you didn't just delete the turn restriction, you just deleted the old one and made a new one with the restriction "only_straight_on".

First of all, please don't delete and remap when possible. Try to preserve history. But also, I would say that only left turn is correct here, since traffic is turning left.

Continuing with revert.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116971729
OldManCelli (2022-09-29 14:33:51+00:00): My bad about the turn restriction. I shouldn't have messed with that and I know better than to delete a feature. As for the bend in the road - I was just trying to make it a bit better. Sorry about the misstep. 
BTW: I see now that someone else made the same change so it is back to where I tried to put it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116971729
EneaSuper (2022-02-04 08:25:33+00:00): Ciao, temo tu abbia collegato un'aiuola alla strada circolare della rotonda 🙂
f_gonella (2022-02-04 10:13:31+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la segnalazione! Ho controllato rotonda e aiuole e non mi risulta però.
EneaSuper (2022-02-04 10:16:17+00:00): Sì scusa, colpa mia, avevo visto male, perdona il disturbo 😂

Buona giornata!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-02-06 11:10:14+00:00): 您好，建筑物不应使用建筑物的楼顶作为位置，而应让边缘和建筑物的脚底下重合，因为卫星图不一定是什么时候拍摄的，它今天可能会朝东，明天可能就会朝西，因此高楼的顶部不可以作为判断标准。
我将安排其他OSMChina DataTeam成员负责回退您的编辑
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116972464
user_10360149 (2022-02-06 11:20:13+00:00): 该部分建筑修改已在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117074981
和
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117075156
中回退

感谢OSMCDT的鼠宝宝和引力波两位朋友
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Famlam (2022-02-03 21:47:40+00:00): Dit ziet er goed uit!
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-04 08:41:34+00:00): Ciao. Il numero dei percorsi, NON si inserisce nel tag name ma nel tag ref. Inoltre, i percorsi escursionistici vanno inseriti come relazioni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-04 08:59:24+00:00): Ciao. Inoltre non trovo alcuna informazione su questi percorsi Ti30, Ti31 e Ti32. Cosa sono? Ciao, Andrea
itasterix (2022-02-04 09:03:36+00:00): Ciao, li ho sistemati con il tag corretto, però guarda che sono anni che ho sempre usato il "name".
Infatti neanche io ho trovato informazioni ma ti assicuro che se ci vai ci sono dei paletti con questi nomi scritti sopra.
Io giro in zona in MTB quindi li conosco.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-04 09:10:06+00:00): Ciao. Se sono percorsi per MTB allora vanno inserirti nel tag mtb:name oppure si deve usare una relazione route=mtb: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
itasterix (2022-02-04 10:01:42+00:00): Io giro in MTB, ma i percorsi sono per tutti, anche a piedi.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-04 10:07:12+00:00): Infatti nessuno ti ha detto di cancellare il path. Ti ho solo detto di inserire le informazioni relative alla MTB in modo differente, come richiesto dalla wiki. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-03 23:32:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
latvia-bot (2022-02-03 17:14:46+00:00): Resulted in error: "400: Bad Request (b'Unknown element bounds, expecting node, way or relation at line 3, column 135')".
eggie (2022-02-03 17:28:02+00:00): Dag DM.. Je vraagt feedback..
Je actie lijkt me oke..
Gr eggie
MxxCon (2022-02-04 03:08:01+00:00): Shouldn't you also tag disused: on name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116973161
Omnific (2022-02-04 07:22:53+00:00): No, the standard is to mark the shop tag as disused, otherwise it will still show up as an open, unnamed clothes store. Technically, you could also mark the Dress Barn as old_name or the like as well. This is the standard used for all closed chain store cleanups on MapRoulette.
FenyMufyd (2022-02-03 17:23:04+00:00): here are the pdf resources separated, also some more source:

https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2017/05/BUKU_1_RUPTL_2015_2024.pdf

https://gatrik.esdm.go.id/assets/uploads/download_index/files/72479-renstra-2015-2019.pdf

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pembangkit_Listrik_Tenaga_Air_Riam_Kanan
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-04 10:55:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
yrtimiD (2024-06-24 22:25:11+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153132255
yrtimiD (2024-06-24 22:25:12+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153132255
yrtimiD (2024-06-24 22:25:13+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153132255
yrtimiD (2024-06-24 22:25:14+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153132255
maraf24 (2022-02-06 17:38:15+00:00): Znowu drogi alternatywne dostają wysokie kategorie?
user_5359 (2022-02-04 08:20:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a lot of unknown keys like
    Batch_ELM = BATCH 3b
    SignType = INTERSECTION
    USNG_10m_Truncated = 15T XM 3155 0763
    USNG_1m = 15T XM 31556 07631
What is the meaning of this keys?

Only yesterday, such an import was requested on the import mailing list from kozidis.sofi@gmail.com. I am not aware that this has already been discussed and accepted.
CharlieMcLovin (2022-02-04 16:09:18+00:00): Good morning! That was my import request on the mailing list. I misunderstood what it meant by "import", I thought it was an approval system. I no longer need to use the import mailing list but do no know how to delete my import request.

Purpose: I am currently creating an emergency response book and a trail book for the county's first responders. We are using the USNG as the grid overlay on the pages. I will also have these USNG points mapped in my map books. By having these points mapped on OSM as well, they can download the info to their devices or can refer to the physical map book depending on the situation.

This data is our own unique data created by our department (Bayfield County Land Records) using hillshade and 2020 aerial imagery, then each location is ground truthed by volunteers to catch any mistakes, colleague double checks my GIS work again, then the signs are printed and installed. 

Batch_ELM:
Is for our reference as we continue to add future batches of points. The USNG sign process are done in batches, since it would be difficult to ground truth everything at once. Therefore we have Batch 1, 2, 3, 3b, and 4, completed so far. This is an ongoing project so in the future there will be Batch 5, Batch 6, etc., as we continue to add more signs to the trails in Bayfield and Sawyer County and upload it to OSM.

SignType: 
Primarily, these USNG signs are installed at trail intersections. However, in a handful of locations they are installed along the trail at dangerous locations where visitors may need help. 

USNG_1m = 15T XM 31556 07631:
It is the address coordinates of the sign post so when visitors call emergency services and see a sign, they can tell responders their location. This is the U.S. National Grid system location/address at it's highest accuracy (1 meter accuracy) and is the exact location of the installed sign. The USNG is consistent throughout the U.S., for more background information, please check out this great resource: https://usngcenter.org/ 

 
USNG_10m_Truncated = 15T XM 3155 0763:
This is the USNG address coordinates printed on the sign. It is the same as the USNG 1m used, but the last digit on the northing and easting are removed (truncated, not rounded) to represent a 10m grid area location. That way when responders arrive, they know where to go and know to search in a larger radius around the sign.

How to read USNG: https://usngcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/FGDC_Info_Sheet1_24APR08_ngt.pdf 

Example:
USNG: 15T XM 3155 0763
CharlieMcLovin (2022-02-04 16:22:18+00:00): Example:
USNG: 15T XM 3155 0763 

*15T- is the Grid Zone Designation
* XM- is the 100,000m Square Identification
*3155- is the easting
*0763- is the northing
*3155 0763- is the 8 digit coordinates representing a 10m grid square, truncated from a 10 digit coordinate representing a 1m grid square

Thank you for your help :D
iandees (2022-02-05 03:27:47+00:00): Can you describe what these signs look like? We could use OSM's "tourist info" tags maybe?