piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-12-05 22:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
chnav (2018-10-13 05:53:31+00:00): Здравствуйте, опишите пожалуйста причину удаления поворотных проездов на ул.Тимирязева с прилегающих улиц. Любое удаление желательно комментировать, например "изменена схема движения" и т.д. также вы удалили парковку около Тимирязева-68, которая отчетливо видна на спутнике. По ней тоже нужен комментарий. Спасибо.
AndyBay (2018-10-16 08:20:38+00:00): я хочу поинтересоваться, вы бываете физически в этом месте? эти поворотные проезды давно убрали и посадили газон. Парковки так же возле РОВД Тимирязева-68 уже месяц как нет. Газон на этом месте. Спутник так вообще 3 -4 летней давности, и многое нужно рисоать по текам или с привязкой к другим объектам
chnav (2018-10-16 08:29:45+00:00): Именно это надо было написать в комментарии к changeset-у, тогда вопросов не возникнло бы. Понимаете когда мы видим новичка, который с первых дней начинает удалять без объяснений - возникают вопросы. К сожалению вандализм в нашем проекте далеко не редкость, приходится быть начеку.
mavl (2019-12-05 22:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Hjart (2018-10-14 17:38:11+00:00): Har du personligt kendskab til området? Jeg undrer mig lidt fordi Bing og DG Standard billederne ser lidt anderledes ud og godt kan se ud til at være nyere end Esri billederne.
agpath (2018-10-14 18:14:01+00:00): Hej! Jag bor här i Hjärup. Esri är gamla bilder. Bing är bättre. Det byggs mycket här.
Hjart (2018-10-14 18:15:42+00:00): Ok. Du brugte Esri her, så du skal nok lave dine ændringer her om så :-)
agpath (2018-10-14 18:45:24+00:00): Oh, nu såg att det handlade om sjukhuset i Malmö. Jag jobbar där. Det byggs massor där så vägar försvinner och det syns inte på några bilder alls! Jag försöker att hålla det uppdaterat men det är svårt.
mueschel (2018-10-17 10:42:57+00:00): Hi,
you added some wetlangs with strange tags:
NomBasfond = Mardock
id = 5

Could you have a look and change these to common OSM tags?

Thanks, Jan
mavl (2019-12-05 22:05:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
SomeoneElse (2018-10-12 22:30:10+00:00): Hello,
Do these roads really not connect to any other road infrastructure?
Best Regards,
Andy
Narayani Barve (2018-10-13 13:27:37+00:00): Yes. They do connect. I could not complete the connection when I digitized these roads. Will do it when I get time. Thanks
Narayani
mavl (2019-12-05 22:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:08:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:01:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
SomeoneElse (2022-04-06 19:39:02+00:00): Just checking - should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633304589 be part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/358939 ?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119270675 suggests "One gap left where signs missing and route unclear.", which I guess is around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4333186 , but the "bit of an extra" to the west looks odd: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=358939
Robert Whittaker (2022-04-07 13:37:46+00:00): Yes you're right -- thanks for spotting that. I've now removed that way from the relation.

The St Edmund Way was previously mapped as following the Stour Valley Path around the edge of Sudbury. But when following it the other day, the signs clearly take it into the town centre, though they're a bit patchy there. 

The gap where I couldn't be sure is around Bullocks Lane. There's a sign sending you SW down Meadow lane, but there isn't any way out there. I couldn't find any signs along the old railway line either.
stromo (2018-10-12 19:47:22+00:00): Please don't use "powerlines" as changeset comment if you have edited something else.
Oberaffe (2018-10-17 05:32:30+00:00): It was related to a powerlines changeset. I removed a connection of the university area with a powerline. Afterwards I got problems to repair the outline. This was only possible by restarting JOSM and creating a extra changeset.
stromo (2018-10-17 18:11:11+00:00): Then I'm sorry. Do you know any good resource for the current state (and the names) of HVDC lines in China?
RicoElectrico (2018-10-13 18:50:08+00:00): Cześć, możesz napisać jaki był Twój zamiar w tej edycji? Niestety z opisu zmian nic nie można się dowiedzieć. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments

To co zrobiłeś(aś), to zmiana budynku na obszar niebędący budynkiem. Zburzyli go czy co?
SHARCRASH (2019-03-27 09:00:13+00:00): Hi ! I'm astonished you edited some elements of this zone as most was quite accurate already, but granted some stuff needed corrections. Well i found out that your source was Geoportail.lu's topo map. Unfortunately it is not always accurate/realistic) so please do not edit without having compared with other sources. 

Like this way i'm going to leave as you edited (according the node's history) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339344609/history . I'm sure that the trail doesn't pass over the cliffs (how come you didn't even pay attention ;) ? ) and it passes on the right side of the building when coming down the hill, as you can see on here with a wide GPS activity heatmap for proof. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pYfHEJNxy-wdAWQ3Nzo2-yLrUHACgQuM/

Now I'm going to edit back the rest though as it's very misleading and should be corrected ASAP.
danny__kay (2019-03-27 16:01:50+00:00): Hi Sharcrash,
Thanks for the feedback.  I'm grateful to you for pointing out the Strava heat maps; I hadn't thought of using them but will do so in the future.  I'd been relying on OSM gpx traces, but often they don't exist or there are very few on a path, so it is not easy to decide the path direction.
Look, we all do our best and sometimes we slip up.  Thanks for the advice but please tone down the sarcasm a bit.
SHARCRASH (2019-03-28 14:23:03+00:00): Sorry if you took it bad, no offense was intended.
gloda (2020-01-12 14:56:05+00:00): danny__kay, are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2929138412 was transformed from an insenct hotel into a hunting stand?
SHARCRASH (2020-02-08 11:16:51+00:00): put it back as insect hotel only
mavl (2019-12-05 22:02:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 21:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2018-10-12 14:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63460231 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
mavl (2019-12-05 21:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-05 22:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Jakka (2018-10-13 17:08:35+00:00): attention maxspeed living_street ? pas 50 mais...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
TheSwavu (2018-10-13 09:24:02+00:00): Hi,

I've reverted your name changes here as Jamison Centre is the name of the shopping centre not the name of the parking aisles.

Thanks.
mavl (2018-10-12 14:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63460231 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
Parzelle13 (2018-10-13 10:19:01+00:00): Hallo, deine Änderung ist soweit o.k. Nur  Telefonnummern solltest du so
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
im internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format eintragen.

Gruß
trigpoint (2018-10-15 12:03:37+00:00): Hi, please could you explain why you have changed the tagging of this building?

It has not been a market for some years and it was certainly a building and arts centre last week.
trigpoint (2018-10-15 17:53:38+00:00): Reverted, this is not a market - Вернулся, это не рынок
kocio (2018-10-17 00:50:12+00:00): Hi, 

Could you explain what do you mean by "it does not match reality"? Is there something not real with gulf being limited by the coastline - other than coastline not being accurate in itself (which is the real source of what you called pseudo precision)?

Southern line was just first approximation (straight line), it should be drawn more precisely over time.
woodpeck (2018-10-17 06:47:29+00:00): I should have been more precise; it is a random subset of reality. The gulf is part of the baltic sea which is not mapped as a named polygon. The gulf consists of smaller named water bodies, namely the "Bothnian Bay" in the North, and the "Bothnian Sea" in the South. These are not mapped as polygons either, and these themselves partly consist of smaller named water bodies like Luodonselkä in the North-East. My point is that the "Gulf of Bothnia" polygon has been arbitrarily been introduced for rendering purposes at a specific zoom range, to have a nice name showing on the map.If you step into the water on the Eastern shore of Hailuoto island, you are stepping
into the waters of Luodonselkä. And into the waters of Bothnian Bay. And into the
Gulf of Bothnia. And into the Baltic Sea. Things will be similar elsewhere. Selecting one of them to create a polygon for is arbitrary and not an accurate representation of reality. I think that it is desirable to record the names and
approximate locations of these water bodies, but we *must* find a better solution
for it than to create massive polygons with thousands of coastline member ways for
each of them. These massive polygons make editing the coastline harder, they are liable to break
at any time, they often suggest a precision that does not exist in reality,
and they're also a burden on data processors down the line.
woodpeck (2018-10-17 06:53:23+00:00): I forgot to mention that if someone *did* want to properly map the Bay of Bothina and the Bothnian Bay and Luodonselkä, these would  be three partly overlapping natural=bay objects which would likely cause editor warnings and mis-countings ("hey, OSM has so-and-so many square kilometres of bays mapped"). But as I said, it's undesirable to have each piece of coastline be part of 20 relations anyway.
kocio (2018-11-15 19:52:34+00:00): The latest thread about bays on the Tagging list is much more generic than this case, so it's better to discuss it here:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-November/thread.html#40911
dieterdreist (2018-11-16 11:52:19+00:00): @woodpeck Do I understand you correctly that you deleted a sea area polygon because other sea areas nearby haven't been mapped (yet?) as polygons? 
I agree that the boundary line is likely not precisely defined (in reality), but discussing this with the creator before deleting it completely would maybe have been more sustainable. You write that nodes are "sufficient", but how can you understand the size/extent of the area from the node?
How can you see that "The gulf consists of smaller named water bodies, namely the "Bothnian Bay" in the North, and the "Bothnian Sea" in the South. ...and these themselves partly consist of smaller named water bodies like Luodonselkä in the North-East." if these are all "perfectly sufficient" nodes?
eggie (2018-10-12 13:24:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-12 13:26:20+00:00): De juiste tag is sidewalk=both.
Verander je het zelf?
De surfacetag is die voor de hoofdrijbaan?
eggie (2018-10-12 14:38:05+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar sidewalk=both
eggie (2018-10-12 13:29:25+00:00): sidewalk=both is de juiste tag.
eggie (2018-10-12 13:28:41+00:00): Ook hier sidewalk=both ipv footway
eggie (2018-10-12 13:27:35+00:00): Veranderen in sidewalk=both svp
Jordi MF (2019-09-03 19:12:07+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por mejor los datos de OSM. He visto que has mapeado como parque l'Antic pas del Trenet. Tengo entendido que el trenet iba desde la Glorieta de l'Estació y continuaba por el Carrer Corts Valencianes. Por tanto, no parece tener sentido que se añada un parque encima de unos edificio y que se etiquete como "Antic pas del Trenet". A no ser que aquí haya algún edificio relacionado con el trenet, este mapeado no sería correcto. Desde luego, anotarlo como un parque no lo es. Por tanto, creo que la mejor solución sería eliminar este parque y, en caso que pueda mapearse algo relacionado con el trenet, hacerlo con otra etiqueta.
Por favor, cuando puedas, aclara qué pretendías mapear para que podamos reflejarlo en el mapa. Muchas gracias de nuevo.
Un saludo!
Jordi
Parzelle13 (2018-10-13 10:23:11+00:00): Hier ebenfalls, 
Telefon, Fax Nummern solltest du so 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone 
im internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format eintragen.

Gruß
Fischkopp0815 (2018-10-15 14:22:26+00:00): Moin, 
Einige deiner Eintragungen erschienen mir merkwürdig, darum habe ich mir das heute mal vor Ort angesehen. Der Spielplatz war schon als Punkt eingetragen. Ich habe das mit deiner Fläche vereinigt. Deine Vorliebe für landuse=grass auch an unpassenden Stellen haben bei mir den Verdacht hervorgerufen, dass deine Eintragungen auch von Pokémon beeinflusst wurden.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Ich  habe das wieder geändert. An der Westerstraße ist ein kleines Waldstück und kein Gras.Um das Haus ist ein Garten. landuse=grass bei der Kirche finde ich ok.
nlehuby (2019-08-16 18:27:12+00:00): Hello,

plusieurs voies de ce parking (par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633333537) ont les tags indiquant que ce sont des panneaux solaires. Ça me semble quand même assez peu probable que ce parking soit une route solaire 😀
ika-chan! UK-USA (2018-11-11 21:49:42+00:00): Hi, your changeset broke valid data regarding lanes and lighting, although it may not be apparent at first. If in doubt, use JOSM, since it comes with the tag conflict resolution detecting thing.
sohcah (2018-10-12 13:50:57+00:00): Oops. Meant St Johns Retail Park
stevea (2018-10-20 23:02:53+00:00): What are you DOING?!  A route=railway is NOT a single set of rail infrastructure which must be contiguous!  It can be multiple tracks which are not, and if such railways ARE what makes up a Subdivision, then THOSE railway=rail segments are what must be in the route=railway relation, even if they are not contiguous!

Can you point to any documentation, discussion or established convention which allows or encourages you to do this?  No?  I didn't think so.  So, the only conclusion that may be drawn (as you use a THIRD user account to obfuscate your actions), is that you have a "pet project" you are trying to complete "behind the scenes," using OSM as your private rail data repository.  That is not OK.

Stop breaking apart perfectly valid route=railway for a pet project of "contiguous" rail subdivisions multiplying like rabbits all over the USA!  It is vandalism, pure and simple.

These are now being aggressively repaired to their "complete" route=railway relations, rather than your total preference of "pieces of these which are wholly contiguous."  It's wrong!
bhousel (2018-10-21 01:25:23+00:00): @stevea Please be nice.. everything in OSM is trivially fixable.