piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
feta2 (2019-02-13 22:22:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for the question. We have an agreement with Digital Globe to use some of their recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap. Where we use it, we always cite the date in the changeset source. We mostly use the imagery that’s already available on iD and JOSM. If you’d like to learn more about the DG imagery, you can browse it here : https://discover.digitalglobe.com
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-12 01:41:11+00:00): motor_vehicle=yes is already implied on this kind of way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67106932
ganarend (2019-07-09 07:38:21+00:00): Hi Paul Johnson,
Thanks for reviewing the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. The MV=yes was added because for track roads the default access is given as 'not specified'. So to provide access the tag was added. We are reverting the changeset. Thanks again for the review.

Regards,
Ganarend
abrensch (2019-02-17 11:02:27+00:00): Hallo sungo,

könntest Du dann auch meine Note prüfen/schliessen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1487037

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
user_3022894 (2019-02-20 09:55:25+00:00): Hi User/-in müllers,
ich glaube, dieser Punkt hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4283972082/history ist kein Vulkan, oder? Du hattest ihn mit natural=vulcano getaggt. Ich vermute mal, das war wahrscheinlich ein Versehen? Ein anderer User hat es auch schon wieder rausgelöscht, nur jetzt hat der Punkt gar kein richtiges Haupttag mehr. Es sollte wahrscheinlich eine Straßenlampe darstellen...
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
JeroenHoek (2019-02-12 08:18:00+00:00): Die stukjes It Holt en Pypsterbuorren die niet aan de doorgaande weg van Deinum naar Leeuwarden (via Skimerwei) zitten zou ik als unclassified houden, niet tertiary. Die zijn immers alleen voor bestemmingsverkeer en fietsers.

Had je deze pagina al eens gezien?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
FRIESLAND123 (2019-02-13 11:29:05+00:00): Ah die pagina maakt alles wat duidelijker. Tot nu toe heb ik alleen de algemene documentatie gelezen, niet die specefiek tot NL.
JeroenHoek (2019-02-13 16:36:31+00:00): Ja die is handig hè? Ik pak hem er voor highway=tertiary ook binnen de bebouwde kom nog wel eens bij.
user_6110846 (2019-02-12 12:49:00+00:00): https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67107336?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2267107336%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2267107336%22%7D%5D%7D
when you change the state border - be sure to control land gov ua
This source is licensed for use in openstreetmap
In addition, there are river names in the ЦДЗК  background ball.
also the names /of the rivers AND GEOMETRY OF BORDER of Ukraine there http://atu.minregion.gov.ua/en/karta#map=13//52.02345168003435//30.940246582031254&&layer=7376316114267884-1,100//8906587201596708-1,100 [INTERACTIVE MAP OF UKRAINE TWO THREE HOURS A DAY THE MAP DOES NOT WORK
ALSO DOES NOT WORK IN THE PERIOD OF KHAKER ATTACK ON THE BODIES OF UKRAINE
FOR EXAMPLE THE ATTACK BY PETYA VIRUS WITH KNOWN
mueschel (2019-02-12 15:06:09+00:00): Hi,
all these objects have many strange tags that should not appear in the OSM database. Please have a look if any of them can be changed to common (documented) tags and remove the rest.

Jan

OBJECTID=430
codeas=61420103
codehc=6142010001
codezs=614201
date=2018/12/29
fiability=HAUTE
name=BCZS BUTEMBO
nameas=MAKASI
namezs=BUTEMBO
operateur=null
operator:type=null
rev=1
type=BCZS
woodpeck (2019-02-21 10:00:47+00:00): I am reverting this changeset for lack of previous discussion and adding a lot of buggy (and hence useless) tags. Please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for instructions on how to do proper imports.
andrewwiseman (2019-05-06 15:54:31+00:00): Hi, what is this supposed to be? It says Buddhist Jehovah's Witness temple, which isn't a thing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4996759374#map=19/29.97620/31.13204
zsolt d (2019-05-08 08:13:27+00:00): Hi, it was not me, but "timhoffmann99". I just put a place marker on it. Check out the history of the point in JOSM.
Hi
Zsolt
andrewwiseman (2019-05-08 12:46:40+00:00): Thanks, I also commented on his edit too.
DD1GJ (2020-09-29 18:59:23+00:00): I deleted temple. It was vandalism from  "timhoffmann99". The user is blocked: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3963
felipeeugenio (2019-02-12 13:05:44+00:00): por favor no cambiar nombres de localidades. EL progreso está emplazado unas cuadras mas al norte. Si están mal ubicadas por favor reubicar. No hay problema, pero no cambiar nombres por favor.
gracias
clayo (2019-02-13 01:13:32+00:00): Estimado Felipe, el sector que aparece denominado como El Sauzal no existe; todo el sector al oriente del Río Vergara se denomina “genéricamente” como El Progreso, asi lo señala la cartografía comunal y aparece en los planos de la ciudad. Puedes consultar el plano regulador de 1984 (zona Z2 al oriente del Vergara), el primero que se hizo luego de que esos terrenos pasaran a formar parte administrativamente de Nacimiento (antes eran de Negrete). Así también aparece en las cartografías del IGM de 1969, pocos años después de que en ese sector, aledaño a la antigua estación Nacimiento, se instalara la papelera INFORSA. Todo esto lo ratifica Por último, independiente del nombre coloquialmente dado al macro sector, el plan regulador actual vigente (2009) reconoce varios nombres para las poblaciones ubicadas en la zona, sean El Progreso, Entre Ríos, Lautaro y Silva Henríquez. En estricto rigor, y si consideramos la toponimia de las poblaciones actuales, el sector que en OSM aparece como El Sauzal, en realidad se llama Población Lautaro (ZRM1 oriente en la lámina 2 del PRC2009, de hecho, un par de cuadras más al sur). En definitiva, y siendo el objetivo del cambio, no existe un sector denominado “El Sauzal” en el área urbana de Nacimiento. Si gustas te ruego puedas cambiarlo tú mismo.
felipeeugenio (2019-02-13 10:22:20+00:00): Ok. Dejaremos el progreso y el Sauzal se cambia por Lautaro. Eso fue lo que entendí.
Estoy consultando con el mapero encargado de importar las localidades desde el ine, quien fue el que puso el Shazam.
En todo caso ruego por favor no nombrar las áreas residenciales. Las localidades la dejamos como nodo.
Yo lo modifico.

Saludos
Alex3271 (2019-06-27 12:02:55+00:00): Salut. Sensurile unice în intersecția între Rovinari și Magheru nu sunt așa cum apar în Google Maps? Mulțumesc!
ted3sco (2019-06-27 12:56:01+00:00): Corect asa cred ca e... ca in Google Maps. Cred ca am vrut sa vad ce indicatoare sunt acolo si am uitat. Modifica daca doresti.
viloan (2019-02-11 18:11:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jakka (2019-02-11 20:26:54+00:00): here already two footway/sidewalk that are not connected to ... routeplanners can not use this.... zoom max in to see https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=669765594#map=19/50.86047/4.35340
mavl (2019-12-05 22:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
viloan (2019-02-11 18:28:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JMUU (2019-02-11 18:31:59+00:00): Correctie voor bron: https://www.plus.nl/supermarkten/meerkerk_plus-versteeg-meerkerk_177
BCNorwich (2019-02-11 20:15:01+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately the website you added for the school does not connect, it links to Finalsite UK, a web designer site. Could you please amend or remove it? 

Regards Bernard.
user_9434724 (2019-02-11 20:23:54+00:00): Hey Bernard it is, though currently the site is down for maintencance,
It should be back up soon,
Regards,
Kaveh
eggie (2019-02-11 19:03:03+00:00): Dag jonrellim... even een leermoment. Op het moment dat je met alle goede bedoelingen eerst een weg verwijdert en daarna opnieuw intekent gaat de historie verloren. Dus kun je niet meer zien wat andere mappers hebben gedaan. Beter dus voor de volgende keer een weg zo veel mogelijk ombouwen met dezelfde elementen. 
mvg
Eggie
jonrellim (2019-02-11 19:04:50+00:00): Aha, prima. in dit geval was de oude weg een beetje raar getekend, dus om alles recht te houden heb ik het opnieuw gedaan. Zal dit de volgende keer vermijden.
eggie (2019-02-11 19:13:35+00:00): Top!
Carnildo (2019-02-12 08:35:24+00:00): There's one more thing you can do to indicate that it's a private laundry: add the "access=private" tag.

You'll need to do this manually: with the building selected, click the "All tags" label at the bottom of the left-hand panel to expand it, click the plus sign at the bottom of the list of tags, and enter "access" in the first column and "private" in the second column.

It's much like setting the "allowed access" field for a road or a parking lot, but it's a rare enough thing to do that there isn't a dedicated user-interface field for it.
Evilscaught (2019-02-12 23:03:40+00:00): Thanks Carnildo!
pitscheplatsch (2019-10-20 12:33:29+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server.
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75952551

#revert
#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
viloan (2019-02-11 18:53:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rarad74 (2019-02-16 10:08:49+00:00): Ciprian, de ce ai sters toate relatiile astea? Ai dezactivat si poligonul residential al Constantei printer ele...
c1pr1an (2019-02-16 11:20:27+00:00): Intru acum sa vad ce s-a întâmplat eu am vrut doar sa actualizez stațiile si traseele de transport in comun. Posibil din greșeală :(
ftcat (2019-02-16 17:11:55+00:00): Hi most the buildings in this part of Zambia are round, rectangular or square. The sections interconnecting them are in fact reed fences to demarcate a yard or garden, or a cattle pen in which case they will not be made of reeds but from cut wooden poles.
saintam1 (2019-02-11 21:51:13+00:00): Hi X-spot, I see you requested a review.

Yes this is a very common situation in Sofia, isn't it. This building has two addresses. It's tricky.

I'm not sure addr:housenumber_1 is the best option, however, because no software is going to pick that up.

Maybe we could put the zh.k.+number on the building way itself, and then the street+number on a node attached to the front of the building? Actually that could work quite well.
andrewwiseman (2019-02-15 14:34:08+00:00): Buenas dias, parece que estás eliminando una gran cantidad de datos en este cambio y otros, ¿puedes explicar por qué? Gracias.
5m4u9 (2019-02-15 20:50:09+00:00): hola, debes referirte a los edificios? hace algun tiempo atrás hicieron un mapeo de huellas de edificios sin tener mucho conocimiento. el resultado fue que hay edificios que no exsten o son varias casas, están desplazadas y antiguas a 2016 y como consecuencia se han borrardo negocios, las interpolaciones de direcciones ya no existen, calles desplazadas.
//
esta problemática de baja calidad de datos lo expuse a la comunidad en un correo a la lista. decidimos que nadie tendrá tanto esfuerzo para mejorar, es como volver a mapear otra vez... decidimos que a medida que vayamos editando 'limpiemos' los edificios erróneos o que necesitan mucho trabajo. quza recuperar algunos edificios...
mueschel (2019-02-12 11:09:26+00:00): Hi,
all these objects have many strange tags that should not appear in the OSM database. Please have a look if any of them can be changed to common (documented) tags and remove the rest.

Jan


    OBJECTID=430
    codeas=61420103
    codehc=6142010001
    codezs=614201
    date=2018/12/29
    fiability=HAUTE
    name=BCZS BUTEMBO
    nameas=MAKASI
    namezs=BUTEMBO
    operateur=null
    operator:type=null
    rev=1
    type=BCZS
PierZen (2019-02-12 13:42:04+00:00): If you look carefully, I did not create these tags but started to correct. If you translate the comment, it says that I support people in the field and that this is an iterative process. They are located north of DRC reacting to the ebola outbreak, adding health facilities. They have been told to look at these tags.
mueschel (2019-02-12 15:07:23+00:00): You're right, I didn't see that they were added before your changeset.
Please excuse me & continue to enjoy OSM :)

Jan
fmoine (2019-02-12 15:57:18+00:00): Dear Jan thanks a lot for the message. 
We will change the tag asap, but I need to convince thursday the people to use OSM as a baseline data for the ebola riposte. OSM community has done an huge work to digitze remotely. Now I am doing some training first to ask local mapper to put information on OSM, as a normal contributor. And in a second time we set up some team to use OSMAND to collect all health facility (quite important for ebola). I put some tag not related to OSM (codeas; codezs, ...) . Those code belong to the gouvernement. We will ajust and we will adjust our workflow between our database and OSM Database
ALl the best FredM
SomeoneElse (2019-02-16 15:56:36+00:00): @fmoine I sent https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2525 before realising that you'd replied here.  Thanks for keeping in touch with people and good luck fixing the data!

@fmoine J'ai envoyé https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2525 avant de réaliser que vous aviez répondu ici. Merci de rester en contact avec les gens et bonne chance pour la fixation des données!
PierZen (2019-02-16 16:30:52+00:00): @SomeoneElse Please note that is part of the Ebola emergeny response by local people coordinated by @fmoine, plus with minimal access to internet.
If you read my Quality reports, we experienced a lot more problems with newbies that participate to mapathons.
We had to retrace completely the Butembo city buildings in the context of this emergency. See https://twitter.com/pierzen/status/1078758919625994245
woodpeck (2019-02-21 10:25:48+00:00): I have reverted this import. Please follow the import rules next time. The best way for newbies to learn that there are rules is to enforce them. If you want to re-import the data, fix it up before importing, not after. Thank you.
PierZen (2019-02-21 13:37:41+00:00): As explained, this has been added by people in the field responding to the ebola crisis. Please explain why you needied to revert rapidly while nothing is done for bad quality data systematically added by newbies in context of mapathons  ?
freebeer (2019-02-21 19:42:59+00:00): because unlike manual newbie mapping, this is not a case of hand-work but it is clear from the tools, the source, and the actual data this is not hand-copied but that it would be trivial to fix the pre-existing data beforehand and re-do the process correctly, instead of leaving bad data about that i encounter years after the imports with the original importer long since vanished.
fmoine (2019-02-22 04:02:40+00:00): Thanks  all for your discussion. It is quite good, I was near to correct it today or a revert or to correct the tag. But yes I am agree with pierre nobody was there when in Matthew 2016 and in Butembo in 2018 mapathon destroyed the data. And we have to clean it in middle of emergency. So thanks to be here also during that time also
fmoine (2019-02-22 04:06:08+00:00): But I am fine with a revert. It is cleaner like that. I will import with tag discussed with OSM-RDC. It was juste the time for the discussion with the gouvernement to show them their tag. Completely agree is not the way and I apologize but it help me a lot to convince to work with OSM as a baseline data. So I put few osm tag, I am in butembo/beni now, and had some meeting to show the workflow.
fmoine (2019-02-22 04:09:07+00:00): So now if people get money to make missing map project with the result we have seen in term of quality. https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/Blog/blob/master/Analyse_Qualit%C3%A9_Base_OSM_Le_Gestionnaire_de_T%C3%A2ches.md   if we put the same money to reinforce local community it will be better. Rather than to deal with bad data
fmoine (2019-02-22 04:11:37+00:00): So again apologize for the disagreement . We are going to push data again this week end and we will work with the import group and ask also why it as such a mess to need to do data cleaning in middle of an emergency. For Now I succes to open the discussion with OSM and also with the local gouvernment to invest more ressource in training and use OSM as baseline.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-02-12 13:26:37+00:00): Olá Feliz, 

Nota para esta sua edição:
O nome da vereda que vem do Hotel dos Prazeres é Caminho Real do Paúl do Mar, não Vereda Prazeres - Paúl do Mar como você colocou, isso é a origem e o destino.

Quando você adiciona praças, deve desenhar uma área e adicionar a etiqueta de área pedestre. o que você colocou foi como sendo um parque, que são espaços verdes, que em nada correspondem à realidade.

Atentamente,

Nuno Caldeira
Feliz Pereira (2019-02-17 15:34:43+00:00): Caro Nuno, Embora saiba que a vereda é um caminho Real mas ele prolonga-se para cima e para baixo de onde a Câmara identificou como Vereda Prazeres - Paúl do Mar. Caminho real existe à volta de toda a Ilha. Só identifiquei assim por estar com placas de toponímia de veredas e estradas colocadas pela Câmara. Foi essa a Razão.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-02-17 15:39:00+00:00): Certamente essa toponímia municipal não faz sentido algum. Caso contrário chamariam a todas "nome de origem X Nome do destino". O que deve permanecer é o nome hierarquicamente superior, ou seja a atribuição regional.
flohoff (2019-02-12 07:58:06+00:00): Moin,
wir haben uns auf der osm-owl Mailingliste eigentlichj geeinigt das wir die willkürlich hinzugefügten cadatre grenzen nach und nach entfernen wollen - Zusammen mit der überarbeitung der Landuses.

Flo
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2019-02-12 09:20:43+00:00): Die beiden angefassten Relationen in diesem Changeset sind Postleitzahlgebiete, keine Kataster-Gebiete?
flohoff (2019-02-12 13:14:31+00:00): 
Es geht um den way - Und das ist ein boundary=cadastre - Oder habe ich was übersehen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320611485
Fischkopp0815 (2019-02-12 13:57:45+00:00): Der Way gehört aber zu 2 PLZ-Relationen und kann darum nicht gelöscht werden ohne diese Relationen zu beschädigen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/913256  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/913254

Beim Way kann aber boundary=cadastre durch boundary=postal_code ersetzt werden.
flohoff (2019-02-12 15:11:33+00:00): 
Woa - Danke - ist mir nicht aufgefallen - bzw da war ich wohl ein bisschen schnell.

Ja - Das cadastre entferne ich dann mal.

Flo
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2019-02-12 15:31:16+00:00): Ich hab gerade endgültig den Rappel bekommen und lösche gerade all die noch übrig gebliebenen Kataster-Relationen, und tagge doppelt genutzte boundary=cadastre Wegstücke um (sind erstaunlich viele die da auch für Postleitzahlen herhalten müssen)

Stieghorst/Heepen ist schon erledigt
kartonage (2019-02-11 21:39:42+00:00): Hej,
vielleicht kannst du ja nochmal nachvollziehbar erklären warum du das weniger verbreitete childcare benutzt und was der Unterschied sein soll. 

Schöne Grüße
gemsquash (2019-02-12 14:13:14+00:00): Hallo, ja gerne: "childcare" wird im deutschen Openstreetmap sehr korrekt als "Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung" angezeigt.

Das Wiki irrt jeoch gewaltig mit der beschreibung bei amenity:kindergarten, da in Berlin sehr deutlich, auch rechtlich und finanziell zwischen Krippe, Hort und KindergartenALTER unterschieden wird. Der Überbegriff ist Kindertagesstätte und nicht Kindergarten!

Die Betreuungskonzepte unterscheiden sich auch untereinander und zudem deutlich von dem in Westdeutschland etablierten Kindergarten.

In Ostdeutschland generell wird der Begriff Kindertagesstätte verwendet.

Zudem haben viele Einrichtungen kein "Kindergartengelände", aber wenn ja, kann die amenity:kindergarten für die entsprechende Fläche verwendet werden.

Ja, die Diskussion spiegelt sich ansatzweise im englischsprachigen Wiki wieder (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare) aber auch dort ist das Thema noch nicht erschöpfend behandelt.

Beide Wikipedia-Artikel (englisch und deutsch) geben die Thematik gut wieder:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_care

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kindertagesbetreuung

Vorlüfiges Fazit: Wenn "childcare" im deutschen Openstreetmap als "Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung" wiedergegeben wird, kann kein grundlegender Fehler entstehen. Die Spezialisierung als "Kindergarten" würde in vielen Fällen die örtlichen und pädagogischen Gegebenheiten missverständlich wiedergeben.

Herzlichen Gruß!