piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
treestryder (2017-11-09 05:48:43+00:00): I noticed a problem with Willow, just west of MLK, and now see that has been changed to "trunk_link". I'm not sure where you got that designation, but that does not seem right. Tertiary was definitely a better fit. Did you change 42 ways in one change set... likely incorrectly? It would be a good idea to make your changes in smaller batches and ask someone before making major changes.

Lansing now has a OSM Wiki and Forum, the links are below, if you would like to join.

Highways http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Highway Samples http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples
Highway_link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link

Lansing OSM Wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lansing,_Michigan

Lansing Forum
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/mcaosm
treestryder (2017-11-09 06:17:09+00:00): Sorry if that sounded hash.
treestryder (2017-11-11 03:42:47+00:00): Here are two more resources:

International Equivalence
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence

Highway Linking Guide
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/a/a0/OpenStreetMap_Highway_links_table_between_different_highway_types..png
treestryder (2017-11-12 03:35:52+00:00): I've added these resources to the Lansing Wiki page.
treestryder (2017-11-18 22:21:33+00:00): I am slowly reversing all of your changes and am working on this changeset now. Log:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kjybbt_e5aC4iDehKISnYvAIUxib86-f4P4-k-HWzPc/edit#gid=0

Next time, please review the OSM documentation, consult the Lansing Wiki page for area standards and ask questions on the Lansing forum, particularly before making such drastic changes.
SomeoneElse (2018-01-15 10:04:46+00:00): I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585425702 shouldn't be an amenity=telephone any more?
3vivekb (2017-10-21 04:00:14+00:00): Be careful sidewalks don't cross streets, that would be a crossing.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-04-07 13:54:50+00:00): milhares de nós duplicados nesta região
Marcos Medeiros (2018-04-11 03:26:48+00:00): Corrigido
SomeoneElse (2021-05-15 10:22:46+00:00): Hello,
If "phone has been removed and replaced with defibrillator" then surely 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5170333539 shouldn't be an "amenity=telephone" any more, should it?
Cheers,
Andy
Warin61 (2017-11-01 21:16:53+00:00): These 'lakes' cannot be relied on to have water .. so the  tag intermittent=yes should be used.
Littlebtc (2017-10-24 08:59:14+00:00): 1 不要只畫一半 QQ 我把剩下都修正好了
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53201829
2 不要用 NLSC 空照圖 QQ 沒授權
esri 的圖很多都很新，可以試試看
RichardAntonius (2017-10-16 03:50:16+00:00): McMasterville* area updates
SomeoneElse (2017-10-16 07:51:15+00:00): Hello,
You still are not using meaningful changeset comments.  We know what "Hydrology" means, but it does not explain the process you are using.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 21:34:55+00:00): What would you write for this set?
I have no imagination
SomeoneElse (2017-10-17 06:37:22+00:00): I'd explain the process that you're going through to add the data.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some ideas.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-17 18:59:56+00:00): thnx
Stereo (2017-10-16 11:25:21+00:00): Diese admin_levels sind aber schon auf der relation.
user_177389 (2017-10-16 12:01:20+00:00): Stimmt natürlich. Ich habe admin_level und boundary an Members ergänzt, wo dies "fehlte". Das betraf nur einen kleinen Teil in Bezug zum Rest, der in Ordnung ist. So ist es einheitlich und erleichtert u.U. die Unterscheidung von anderen Objekten bei Edits, wenn Relationen nicht geladen sind und Ways für unnötig gehalten und deswegen "aufgeräumt" werden (was offenbar recht häufig passiert).
PlaneMad (2021-01-11 04:43:59+00:00): Wow, this is the most detailed mapping with field boundaries i have seen in India. Amazing work!!
user_5359 (2017-10-16 17:01:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generel credit cards.
Sanniu (2017-10-22 12:13:54+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532866401 - is it roundabout?
sivan00 (2017-10-22 12:52:06+00:00): Yes.
Sanniu (2017-10-22 13:11:26+00:00): Thx, fixed.
chillly (2017-10-20 12:58:37+00:00): "Improvement of map accuracy" is not a very helpful changeset comment. How did you improve things? What did you improve? Is there a common thread to the edit?

It really helps reviewers.
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:58:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:57:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generel credit cards.
mbethke (2017-10-16 14:58:04+00:00): That's not a wilderness hut there in the military area.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-16 12:45:51+00:00): Hi! You requested a review. This looks good. Nothing wrong here. You could do things better in future. There are some other buildings to the right of that building which you could map as well. You have tagged this as "building=yes", which isn't *wrong*, but it looks like a barn to me, so "building=barn" would be better. 🙂👍
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-16 12:48:33+00:00): You requested a review of this. Similar to last time ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52972340 ), this is a perfectly fine edit. 🙂 Welcome to OSM, and keep up the good work! 👍

Likewise, if you used a more specific building value, that would be better. This looks like a house, so "building=house" is more accurate.

And again, there is what looks like a barn to the bottom right which you could map as well.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-17 11:44:05+00:00): You requested a review, so here it is! Similar to other edits this is perfectly fine and correct.

Using a building=barn here (it looks like a barn) makes the map better than just building=yes. There are a few other buildings around which you didn't map. While you're in an area, why not just map a few more.
praeteritum (2023-12-11 04:59:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144984947.
ranjithjoy (2017-10-16 07:50:15+00:00): Source: https://data.seattle.gov/Transportation/SDOT-Street-Signs/atig-uucb/about
SomeoneElse (2017-10-16 07:27:10+00:00): Hello Salaamlogari,
I think that this got saved accidentally - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532878906/history just seems like a doodle.
I've removed it.
Best Regards,
Andy
highflyer74 (2017-10-16 07:40:17+00:00): Moin!

Sinnvoller wäre es hier, den Node in das betreffende (Haupt-)gebäude zu setzen und dafür den name=* von den Gebäuden zu entfernen. Eine Einrichtung sollte nur einmal in OSM eingetragen werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Ein_Objekt_in_der_Realit.C3.A4t_entspricht_genau_einem_Objekt_in_OSM) und da muss man sich dann zwischen Node und Gebäude entscheiden.

Auch wäre das Tagging nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club sinnvoller, da es sich vermutlich nicht um ein öffentlich verfügbares "Sportzentrum" handelt.

Gruss aus dem Bremer Osten!
ranjithjoy (2017-10-16 07:50:28+00:00): Source: https://data.seattle.gov/Transportation/SDOT-Street-Signs/atig-uucb/about
user_5359 (2017-10-16 17:03:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generel credit cards.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_3022894 (2019-06-22 20:29:32+00:00): Hi Julian,
auch wenn es mehr als ein Jahr her ist, wollte ich nur sagen, dass du dich bei dem für die Goethestraße angegebenen maxspeed leider vertan hast, da ist komplett bereits 30er-Zone. Ich hab's bereits korrigiert. Viele Grüße, Lukas
ranjithjoy (2017-10-16 07:50:42+00:00): Source: https://data.seattle.gov/Transportation/SDOT-Street-Signs/atig-uucb/about
Constable (2017-10-16 08:29:04+00:00): ok la strada è stata chiusa ma siccome noi siamo meglio di g.maps andiamo oltre questi tipo di problemi superficiali, a noi interessa sapere se è stata sbarrata da dei jsersy di cemento, fatta saltare con esplosivo, trasformata in parco per cani e così via.
L'asfalto è rimasto dov'era? un pedone riuscirebbe a percorrerla ancora? un ciclista?
chi arriva da qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1184145309 deve fare tutto il giro verso nord per arrivare al supermercato?
Grazie!
ciao
Gh0stz0x (2017-10-16 09:04:34+00:00): La strada fatta saltare con l'esplosivo mi mancava.. e che tag bisognerebbe usare? :-D
Constable (2017-10-16 13:21:05+00:00): Attendevo tuoi consigli sul tag più adatto :D
ginfix (2017-10-16 16:33:08+00:00): Ora dove ho interrotto la strada c'è un cancello non posso entrare per dirvi cosa c'è adesso, sicuramente non si può più passare ne in macchina ne a piedi. Appena ho l'occasione verifico anche il parcheggio che era del supermercato.
Saluti
Gh0stz0x (2017-10-17 05:32:00+00:00): Scusami ginfix ma ho ripristinato la way ed ho aggiunto i tag corretti sia al parcheggio disused:amenity=parking disused:parking=surface che al landuse abandoned=yes e sul cancello ed il parcheggio access=no . Dal parcheggio 'nuovo' si vede lo stato del parcheggio del negozio ed è in stato di abbandono. Ho ripristinato perché sulla via Bonfadini vicino al cancello ci sono abitazioni, poi è meglio usare i tag corretti piuttosto che cancellare. Se Constable suggerisce altri tag da usare li mettiamo.
ginfix (2017-10-17 09:21:59+00:00): Appena prima dell'angolo della casa c'è anche una catena
Constable (2017-10-17 10:08:25+00:00): Concordo con Andreas, hai fatto bene.
Se non è stato abbattuto, io aggiungerei il tag building=* al poligono che una volta ospitava il supermercato, toglierei il tag landuse=industrial (perché non sono certo sia appropriato in questo caso e perché credo dovrebbe indicare l'area, non il perimetro dell'edificio) e aggiungerei la catena di cui parla ginfix.
La catena preferirei non aggiungerla io, non saprei dove e non saprei che valore dare al tag access, il resto se siete d'accordo posso anche farlo io.
Grazie per la collaborazione, ciao
Gh0stz0x (2017-10-17 20:53:41+00:00): Infatti, toglierei anch'io il landuse=industrial. È ben descritto pure sul wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dindustrial
A novembre sarò in Via Bonfadini e darò un occhio. Grazie, per me va bene se fai modifiche, perché purtroppo il mio pc é ko.
Constable (2017-10-17 22:24:25+00:00): fatto, grazie per la collaborazione
Polarbear (2017-10-17 23:16:52+00:00): Hallo Kiekin,
es erscheint ungewöhnlich, dass die Wege in Kleingartenanlagen so heissen wie die Anlage selbst?
Was ist die Quelle dieser Namen?
Bitte auch keine Abkürzungen wir "KGA" verwenden.
Kiekin (2017-10-18 07:45:13+00:00): Das ist der offizielle Name dieses Weges laut LGB (Landesvermessung und Geobasisinformation Brandenburg). Auch mit der Abkürzung KGA. Siehe https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/
Polarbear (2017-10-18 13:36:29+00:00): Anders als in Berlin und inzwischen auch in Sachsen, dürfen wir das Geoportal Brandenburg nicht für OpenStreetMap nutzen. die Lizenzbedingungen sind nicht kompatibel.
eggie (2017-10-16 07:54:43+00:00): Wellicht als je alle bomen apart tagt zou je het vlak op landuse=grass kunnen zetten. Anders zie je door het bos letterlijk de bomen  niet.
Die tag park zou ik weglaten.
De naam zou je op het vlak kunnen laten staan. 
Op gras krijg je hetzelfde effect als het Herdenkingsmonument MH17
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.34780/4.68687
Succes..
literan (2017-10-16 12:52:38+00:00): Здравствуйте! Адреса на POI не нужны (они берутся из контуров домов). К тому же вы их пишете криво (гляньте хотя бы на самих домах, как правильно)
Алексей Мезенцев (2017-10-16 12:57:27+00:00): Спасибо за правки. Удалил адрес.
Hjart (2017-10-16 07:46:58+00:00): Why are you adding "maxheight=none" to all "highway=*"?
nemo-xx (2017-10-16 09:45:08+00:00): My reasoning ist that this e.g. helps car GPS devices - there are sometimes roads with hight limitations (typcially due to bridges) and one can configure a GPS to only make use of roads with a minimum hight.
Hjart (2017-10-16 09:50:49+00:00): Yes, indeed, but you should only add it to those pieces, where it's actually needed (such as under bridges or roofs). I spend a lot of time checking out tags on roads (and other objects) and unnecessary tags only makes my job harder.
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:52:15+00:00): Basically having to sift through a lot of unnecessary tags makes it harder to spot the interesting ones. Take for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36522887. When hunting errors in an area like this you really don't want a lot of unneccessary tags everywhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:KISS_principle
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 08:01:01+00:00): Hello,
Just for info, "layer" without crossing ways isn't always unnecessary.  Sometimes it's used by mappers to indicate what layer a particular feature is at relative to other features that they might not have been mapped yet, though the imagery suggests that that is unlikely to be the case here.
Each example will therefore either need local knowledge or to be checked carefully in a proper editor.
Did you do that here?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 07:56:15+00:00): Hello,
Could you explain the reasoning behind the "building" tag changes here?  It started out as building=yes, then had that removed, then had building=no added, then removed.  It still has a "building:levels" tag.  It's visible on the imagery, but perhaps has been demolished?  If the building still exists, presumably it should be building=yes, and if it doesn't then presumably the "building:levels" tag should not be there?
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Constable (2017-10-16 08:00:02+00:00): Grazie per aver aggiunto la ciclabile, tieni conto però che da come la hai mappata risulta che incrocia via prati grassi ma non ha nessun punto in comune con essa. Gli unici casi in cui due strade che si intersecano non debbano essere connesse tra loro è quando da una non si può andare all'altra, quindi c'è un punte o un tunnel. Questo non mi sembra il caso, quindi per favore fai si che siano connesse.
Grazie
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 07:48:00+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain in what way "removing an unnecessary tag" improves the map?
Generally speaking the approach with "unnecessary" tags (such as "created_by" on objects) is that they're only removed when that object is edited.  This avoids creating unnecessary object versions.  What you appear to be doing is seeking out huge numbers of these and removing them.
It may be that the Russian community has discussed the removal of this tag; if so can you please point to the discussion?
Best Regards,
Andy
4004 (2017-10-16 21:06:02+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
с домом все в порядке, если вы уверены, что адрес верный, то отлично
mavl (2018-12-25 19:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Владимир К (2017-10-16 14:35:51+00:00): немного неверное обозначение. я поправлю
Constable (2017-10-16 08:50:46+00:00): ciao, qua va tutto bene, se riesci però aggiungi i vari tag fee=*, maxstay=*, access=*, surface=* ai parcheggi che aggiungi, perché un parcheggio privato è ben diverso da uno pubblico e gratuito, per chi consulta la mappa è fondamentale capire il tipo di parcheggio, grazie mille, ciao!
Nakaner (2017-10-16 08:57:17+00:00): Hi googlenaut,

which editor do you use to upload your changesets? Editors should always set a created_by=* tag on changesets which is the OSM equivalent of the User-Agent header of HTTP requests.

Please refrain from uploading further changesets with this editor until this issue has been fixed.

Best regards

Michael
googlenaut (2017-10-16 12:43:11+00:00): Hi Nak,
normally I choose JOSM, but it crashes sometimes on drawing lines. My current workaround is to do only minor changes to limit the loss of data.
nevw (2017-10-16 09:58:24+00:00): Your opening hours format is incorrect:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
majid1359 (2017-10-16 08:17:26+00:00): مکان ها اشتباه بود پاک شد و دوباره تصحیح شود
Olga | Yanosik (2017-10-29 09:15:33+00:00): Hej, mam wielką prośbę o usuwanie end_date przy otwieraniu remontów. Dzięki, Olga
Hjart (2017-10-16 09:17:06+00:00): Jeg har fornylig forsøgt at standardisere tankstationer i DK, så de alle bruger https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name (fordi ikke alle kort viser værdien af brand eller operator tags).
ThomasA (2017-10-16 09:27:51+00:00): OK, så retter jeg til name. Jeg kan se, at der vist også er lidt med vejen under taget, jeg skal forbedre.
ff5722 (2017-10-16 09:17:17+00:00): I think it's better to avoid placeholder names like "村". Adding a node place=village without a name is sufficient, or draw a landuse=residential to render unnamed villages.
It could even be a nuisance later, if people use search tools to find places with missing names, the placeholder names will be missed.
katpatuka (2017-10-16 09:36:18+00:00): One can also easily search for name=村 in an area. The point is it gets rendered and someone local might get curious or annoyed and might start to add the missing name (some day). GNS data for villages is VERY bad for Shanxi and Shaanxi provinces - In some regions there are no Chinese names given but only something like "Kangjiagang;K'ang-chia-kang" or "Chi-cheng-tien;Chi-chen;Jizhen" being actually the town 吉镇 which I only found with the josm's wikidata plugin.
ff5722 (2017-10-16 09:50:26+00:00): That's right. There's not that much harm, it just looks a little silly. (with overpass you can also search for place=village without a name tag: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/smK)
It's actually a problem of the renderer, a village with no name should be rendered with a dot for example.

Almost always when GNS only has a latin alphabet name, it's a 乡 or 镇 although it will be clear from the imagery that it's place=town anyways.
4004 (2017-10-16 21:23:27+00:00): интересная аргументация - у вас есть данные по проекту?
Pavelfantik (2018-05-11 20:21:39+00:00): про продление возможно было сказано в 2010 году. Но после этого  не упоминалось. И в ближайшее будущее точно ничего здесь переделывать не будут. Там жилые дома и парковки . Не не будет там транзитной дороги
eggie (2017-10-16 09:38:03+00:00): Probeer svp op de bestaande BAG adresnode te taggen. Ik heb de info overgezet.
eggie (2017-10-16 09:38:20+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-20 17:03:39+00:00): Il sentiero 701 (cioè il frequentatissimo e mantenutissimo sentiero sotto la funivia di Colverde) non è certamente dismesso. Suppongo in un semplice disguido del catasto sentieri, per me va ripristinata la relazione.
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-20 18:15:27+00:00): Vagando fra la documentazione SAT sembra che 701, 702, 724 e 751 siano in realtà diventati sentieri gestiti dal Parco Paneveggio e Pale (sul sito del parco non trovo niente al riguardo) non propriamente dismessi. Andrebbero quindi fatti abbozzi di relazione coll'operator nuovo.
simone_girardelli (2017-10-20 21:36:21+00:00): Ciao, ti rispondo in mailing list, mi sembra la cosa migliore, altrimenti perdo il filo logico.
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-20 17:37:45+00:00): Di nuovo, sentiero sul campo presente e segnalato, nessun segno di dismissione
mueschel (2017-10-17 19:17:30+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded more than 60 buildings with the t "bulding". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
naoliv (2017-10-16 15:14:08+00:00): Flavio, o que seria exatamente este local, por favor?
Constable (2017-10-16 09:38:12+00:00): grazie per aver inserito i tag suggeriti, ricorda anche il tag access=private se mappi parcheggi privati, grazie mille!
4004 (2017-10-16 21:29:39+00:00): поправляте чужие и свои ошибки, спасибо. часы все же attraction
4004 (2017-10-16 21:32:51+00:00): ну вот, только я подумал, что вы решили серьезнее относиться. зачем сносить тег покрытия? и проходимость пешком на тротуар не надо ставить, она там по умолчанию
4004 (2017-10-16 21:41:15+00:00): одно другому не мешает
Pavelfantik (2018-05-11 20:14:45+00:00): я понял
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:50:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the Building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331282811? Are this two different courts?
wsfqZ! (2017-10-16 17:24:56+00:00): I did not see it on OSMand! I guess I missed it. My apologies!
user_5359 (2017-10-16 17:31:09+00:00): No problem! Did you change this?
moreno96 (2019-04-23 21:19:01+00:00): It's time to Improve your knowledge... Or decrease activity in foreign countries.
You have been destroying line 2B relation, but I named that line as "line 2b" because that line will constructed as development part after completing line 2.
That line will have a different end station from line 2.
You left only active part of line 2,2B now, but why? Active part should have a different relation, but why you removed allll another stations and ways from relation line2?
Claudius Henrichs (2019-06-11 09:38:24+00:00): We discussed this in Telegram chat a while ago and Line 2B extension has its own relation with proposed:route tag
Minh Nguyen (2017-10-16 17:39:51+00:00): Cross Country Roads was a source for this changeset.
Rainero (2018-01-17 21:01:17+00:00): Hallo AniRiebe,

durch ein Qualitätssicherungs-Tool bin ich auf viele Objekte in Halle (Saale) aufmerksam geworden, die fehlerhafte Adressen haben. Bei einigen stelle ich fest, daß sie am falschen Ort plaziert sind.
Das ist leider ein typischer Fehler, der mit der Wheelmap auftritt, vor allem bei neu erstellten Objekten.
Hier betrifft es das Ärztehaus Vogelweide (richtige Position wäre Elsa-Brändström-Straße 182a) und das Sonnenstudio Vogelweide (der Punkt liegt mitten auf der Elsa-Brändström-Straße vor Hausnummer 89, sollte aber wohl in Hausnummer 22 sein).
In Halle macht es nun wohl einige Mühe, diese falsch plazierten Punkte zu identifizieren und zu korrigieren.
Daher meine Bitte, mit der Wheelmap keine neuen Punkte einzutragen, sondern dafür einen OSM-Editor, z.B. den im Browser verwendbaren Editor iD zu verwenden.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 14:32:16+00:00): Are you sure that there is lighthouse at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1863593260/history ?

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202785
Pavelfantik (2018-05-11 19:23:38+00:00): artwork
BCNorwich (2017-10-16 12:36:15+00:00): Hi I removed the school POI, info is already on the building outline. Regards
Krad (2017-10-16 12:51:03+00:00): thanks still learning the difference.
mgpx (2017-10-18 19:20:45+00:00): Vadetetőt az amenity=game_feeding címkével tudsz jelölni
eggie (2017-10-16 13:21:30+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd