piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2020-12-17 21:00:23+00:00): Hi,

This looks like you are saving a copy of your changes to a local disk. The problem is that the save is before the upload to OSM, as such the local data has flags that says it is not uploaded. When you upload again follow some change the data that was uploaded is uploaded again creating a duplication. So far there are 3 instances of rooms, lifts and stairs. 

If you are saving locally (I do it too) please save after you upload to OSM so the present 'loaded' status is saved.
philippec (2020-12-17 10:51:40+00:00): Dat is dan nr 734.
abakus_uploader (2020-12-16 23:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ndm (2020-12-16 20:19:25+00:00): You've made buildings non-square and haven't aligned the imagery with existing map data!
ndm (2020-12-16 20:21:20+00:00): Redrawn correctly.
ssnjan (2020-12-17 11:39:24+00:00): Hi Ndm, 
I have added the service road and modified the building geometry based on Bing aerial Imagery using the imagery offset feature. I have missed out on squaring the building outline. I apologise for the miss from my end. Thanks for improving my edits.
Regards,
ssnjan
user_5239402 (2020-12-16 08:24:49+00:00): 안녕하세요 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다!
오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 변경 집합 주석이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다. "는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다.
왜 당신이 무엇을했고 당신의 출처가 무엇이 었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁 을 방지 합니다.
ndm (2020-12-16 20:09:01+00:00): Redrawing this - you've made buildings non-square and haven't applied an offset to Bing Imagery to match existing map content.
ssnjan (2020-12-17 11:40:14+00:00): Hi Ndm, 
I apologise for the miss from my end in squaring the buildings. I realize that the segments added by me are misaligned. I will take this as a learning in my future edits. Thanks for the feedback and corrections.
Regards,
ssnjan
ndm (2020-12-16 20:04:36+00:00): Retagged this as a driveway, which is much more likely.
user_5239402 (2020-12-16 08:21:39+00:00): 안녕하세요
바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 작성해 주시기 바랍니다.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-22 18:31:06+00:00): Skąd wiesz że to rondo tak sie nazywa?
C2oc4 (2025-04-05 06:18:04+00:00): Mieszkaniec wprowadził mnie w błąd przepraszam
user_5239402 (2020-12-16 08:24:02+00:00): 안녕하세요 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다!
오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 변경 집합 주석이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다. "는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다.
왜 당신이 무엇을했고 당신의 출처가 무엇이 었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁 을 방지 합니다.
Joseph E (2020-12-20 09:09:25+00:00): Hi LukeZ, thank you for helping to map Dekai. It’s fun to do this, because there was no map of this town before a couple of years ago when I visited and added some roads by GPS, and now we have good aerial imagery!
Diegzzz18 (2020-12-19 21:56:03+00:00): Hey you.
Why have you modified this building? This is not a rectangular building and you made it like that
Alderney (2020-12-22 12:05:14+00:00): Hi Diegzzz18.
My intention was just to snap the two parts of the building together. I’ve reduced the length of the southern edge of the building. Thanks for the comment.
abakus_uploader (2020-12-16 23:30:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
XnL (2020-12-26 19:42:50+00:00): Поскольку вы объединили улицу Героя Яцкова с участком после поворота на СОШ №66, то сломали маршруты №3,4,11,25,45,47 общественного транспорта. Прошу в следующий раз внимательно объединять дороги и следить при этом за отношениями.
eggie (2020-12-16 09:29:10+00:00): Dag mapper33
Realiseer je wel dat dit soort brandgangen (?)  van harte gaan meerouteren in routeplanner en gpsr.
Meestal zet ik brandgangen achter tuinen op access=private (Dat klopt ook formeel)
Je zou natuurlijk ook foot en bicycle=destination kunnen overwegen.
Wanneer dit doorgaande fietsroutes zijn is het uiteraard goed, maar ik heb m'n twijfels.
Kijk je nog even naar je edits.
(motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op footway)
MVG,
eggie
mapper033 (2020-12-16 11:20:45+00:00): Hi, dit zijn niet per definitie brandgangen. Dit zijn gewoon publiek toegankelijke stegen, en zijn ook een stuk breder dan brandgangen. Gebeurt ook vaak genoeg dat fietsers doorgaand daarlangs fietsen. Ik zal motor_vehicle even wijzigen als dit nog niet gedaan is. Bedankt!
eggie (2020-12-16 12:01:39+00:00): Oke.. up to you!
Lokale kennis is belangrijk.. Dat zie je maar weer.
gr eggie
ndm (2020-12-18 18:15:07+00:00): It would probably be better if you could adjust Bing imagery offset to match existing map data - so everything remains "in sync".

I've adjusted the edit this time.
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:46:22+00:00): Hello Thank you for your contribution to this project.
Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95929839
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:47:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please be more accurate in your mappings and square each rectangular building

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95929839
eggie (2020-12-16 09:30:22+00:00): Wanneer een winkel verdwijnt blijft het adres gewoon intact. Het BAG adres heb je nu helaas verwijderd en is dus niet meer vindbaar in OSM.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-16 09:35:07+00:00): adres hersteld
mapper033 (2020-12-16 11:16:25+00:00): Mea culpa. Bedankt
Frans S (2020-12-21 11:25:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Your mappings are rather accurate but not squared.
I send you a PM with more info
Best regards and keep mapping
AndersAndersson (2020-12-17 08:37:34+00:00): Det är en informationsskylt jag glömde lägga till taggar på.
Jag har ändrat nu.
johantiden (2020-12-17 10:12:01+00:00): Snyggt!
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:42:52+00:00): Hello. See my previous comments on which features to map. Please check also the imagery you are working with. Standard Maxar should load automatically, but Bing imagery is sometime loaded. Known issue. 
Please square also the buildings you map and don't connect nodes of buildings to other features
Here you can read how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95930468
ndm (2020-12-18 14:31:48+00:00): Redrawn this so service road goes on correct side of tree (see Bing Streetside) and doesn't impinge on the building visible in Bing.
ansukess (2020-12-22 16:04:14+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies for the misalignment. i was confused with the street view and misinterpreted the geometry. thanks for the quick correction. going forward, i will be more cautious with the geometry before saving the edits. always happy to learn from the community.
Frans S (2020-12-21 11:54:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please pay more attention on mapping buildings individually. You tend to map multiple objects as 1 building
Best regards and keep mapping
_wp (2020-12-21 13:27:01+00:00): Hi Frans,  Many buildings in Vietnam have multi pitch/layer roof making them hard to be accurately mapped. I think mapping building only by roof shape and color would overrepresent the actual number of buildings.  Best.
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:38:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
In general your mappings are rather accurate and squared. But , some mappings are oversized. include the yard, trees  or greenfields, Just follow the roofline.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95931297
frosm (2020-12-16 12:56:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
les restrictions d'accès doivent renseigner ce que dit le panneau sur place.
par exemple s'il n'y a pas de panneau qui dit "privé pour les cavaliers à cheval", il ne faut pas remplir le champ "cheval"
j'imagine que le panneau à l'endroit dit accès privé ou circulation locale, ce qui reseigne une seule fois avec la restriction en question.
de même si c'est une barrière qui bloque l'accès, il n'est pas utile de dupliquer l'information de la barrière sur tous les chemins.
Bonne continuation
François59 (2020-12-16 14:40:45+00:00): Bonjour Frosm,
merci beaucoup pour votre aide et vos conseils.
Effectivement, nous des panneau qui précisent "Propriété privée, accès réservé aux résidents". Ces panneaux sont sur chaque barrière (aux 4 entrées de la résidence).
Merci encore à vous et bonne journée.
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:34:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
This is a building only project. See the instructions. 
Please focus on building rather than other features (where you introduced errors by crossing  features)
The buildings you mapped are inaccurate , oversize sometimes and not squared.


This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95931579
user_5359 (2020-12-17 19:39:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/885477761, https://www.osm.org/way/884851800:
what is the meaning of the booth tags
good=job
just=a few adjustments with missing buildings.
?
eggie (2020-12-16 10:50:43+00:00): Beste Martien.. 
Je vraagt om een review. 
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.
Wanneer een weg privé is kun je toevoegen access=private.
De track zal dan niet meer routeren in OSM.
Voor een deel heb je de boomgaard verwijderd. Dat zal waarschijnlijk niet de bedopeling zijn. Er is natuurlijk altijd wel iets. Dan kunnen we wel half Nederland van de kaart halen.
Ik draai het even terug en zet access private op de bewuste track.
je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95932011
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-16 10:53:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #95935879
Ik pas nog wat aan.
eggie (2020-12-16 11:05:47+00:00): 'Boomgaard' hersteld en omgezet naar plant_nursery. (kwekerij)
Dat pad tussen die aanplant op de kwekerij maar weggelaten... Dat heeft geen openbare functie.
Je zou het kunnen intekenen, maar dan met access=private  .. Up to you.
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-12-16 15:13:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you add the key building to a highway? see https://www.osm.org/way/94781279/history. I delete the keys.
eggie (2020-12-16 11:16:45+00:00): Dag mapper.. je hebt met je actie 
Haringweg  24b verplaatst naar een ander deel van Spakenburg.
Meestal gebeurt dit door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Editor iD is daarin berucht. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95932070
eggie (2020-12-16 11:19:31+00:00): Adres teruggeplaatst.
mapper033 (2020-12-16 11:23:13+00:00): Zal er op letten, bedankt.
GinaroZ (2020-12-16 12:03:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I think the reason why you can't route along the track on the east side is because of this gate tagged as private: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296975649 - presumably this is open to those on foot and bikes but not vehicles?
ojmchamberlain (2020-12-16 12:29:02+00:00): This is exactly right. I'll try to adjust the settings for the gate!
tomhukins (2022-06-15 17:47:03+00:00): This looks like a residential street rather than a service road, so I've altered its tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122429221 and added its name from OS OpenMap Local.
vladaboitik (2022-06-15 19:10:50+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95933746
vladaboitik (2022-06-15 19:11:00+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95933746
eggie (2020-12-16 11:11:20+00:00): Dag Puntertje.. svp niet naar de daken kijken. Luchtfoto's zijn niet loodrecht genomen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-16 11:13:19+00:00): Gebouw teruggeplaatst conform Kadaster.
Puntertje (2020-12-16 11:16:34+00:00): Oh excuus, zal niet meer gebeuren. Bedankt voor je opmerking. Groet Puntertje
eggie (2020-12-16 11:21:59+00:00): Waarschijnlijk heb je ook nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen van de Dutch Community. Ik zal het je per BP toesturen. 
MVG,
eggie
Frans S (2020-12-16 12:07:43+00:00): Hello. Thank you so much for your contribution to this project.
I noticed that you tried to map buildings with a courtyard inside it.
Please read this article how to map and tag it
https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/k7xm4i/how_do_i_map_a_building_with_several_outdoor/

best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95934122
Frans S (2020-12-16 12:03:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95934878
Irma IRM-ED (2021-06-01 05:10:22+00:00): Hi CatherineG_ImportAccount,
I want to ask you about your highway classification as a path?
How about an unclassified highway?
Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/810543460

Thanks again :)
CatherineG_ImportAccount (2021-06-01 10:18:45+00:00): Hi Irma IRM-ED, I see it should be unclassified and not path or track!. Thank you for correcting and notification
moosfrosch (2021-07-21 21:24:06+00:00): Das als Ausflugsziel weithin bekannte Wildgehege einfach ohne weitere Angaben als unzäunte Wiese umzumappen grenzt an Vandalismus. Klar ist das kein Zoo  (auch wenn das eigentlich OSM-Vorgabe für Gehege ist, ignoriere ich aber auch immer). Aber wenigstens als Attraktion und Name muss man es schon mappen!
PVitt (2021-07-22 10:50:08+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch,

Nach einer Diskussion mit anderen Mappern denke ich, dass attraction annehmbar ist. Ein Zoo ist es nach der Definition im Wiki nicht, da die Tiere für die Fleischproduktion gehalten werden. Ob es eine touristische Attraktion ist, wage ich zu bezweifeln, da mir kein übermäßiger Besuch ortsfremder Personen bekannt ist, aber es kann ja auch eine Attraktion für wenige sein.

Was mich allerdings etwas irritert, ist der Name. Die Weide hat einen Flurnamen, der lautet allerdings nicht "Wildgehege Herzhausen". Hier vor Ort ist die Weide auch nicht unter einem lokalen Namen bekannt. Daher würde ich interessieren, woher der Name "Wildgehege Herzhausen" stammt.

Viele Grüße aus Herzhausen!
moosfrosch (2021-07-22 15:20:38+00:00): Hallo, das mit "Attraction" hatte ich auch mehrfach diskutiert und mache das seither bei allen Tiergehegen so, die kein Zoo sind. iD bietet das auch als "Tiergehege" an, ohne Zoo-Tag.  Macht ja keinen Sinn, die Karte voller Elefantensymbole zu kleistern.  Ist nicht ganz Anleitungs-Konform ("erfordert enclosure" -> "erfordert zoo"), Auch die Untertags zoo=enclosure - Wildgehege, zoo=wildlife_park - Wildpark und zoo=aviary - Voliere" helfen nicht, manchmal werden sie für Anlagen innnerhalb eines Zoos verwendet (dann wird der Zoo mit mehreren Elefantensymbolen dargestellt), umgekehrt sind Wildgehege und einzelne Stadtpark-Volieren nunmal kein Zoo (weder tatsächlich noch gefühlt noch nach Gesetzeslage).
Sonst kann man Tiere nur mit "landuse" und "produce" mappen, aber nur, wenn das Gehege nicht touristisch genutzt wird (mag hier zusätzlich sinnvoll sein, wenn das wirklich Tiere zum Fleischgewinn sind - das ist nicht bei jedem Gehege so). 
Wegen Tourismus: Weg entlang, Bänke und Jagdhütte (war zumindest früher so eine Präparateaustellung) ziehen Besucher an. Wird auch als Ausflugsziel vielfach genannt; ob es da eine offizielle Bezeichnung gibt, weiß ich nicht, wird aber überall so genannt, z.B. https://www.komoot.de/highlight/629424
Bei TIM online heißt es bei Zoomstufe 1:2000 sogar in der amtlichen Karte "Wildpark", bei 1:5000 "Wildgehege" (2x, südwestlich angrenzend ist ein weiteres Gehege eingezeichnet). Was genau ist ein offizieller Name? Vielleicht dann nur "Wildgehege"? Verwechlungsgefahr besteht in der Nähe ja nicht. Aber ob das Ehrenmal offiziell "Ehrenmal Herzhausen"  heißt? Oder "nur" ein Ehrenmal ist? Auf den offiziellen Karten hat es nur ein Symbol...
Gruß 
PS sorry, wollte Dir nicht mit dem "Vandalismus" zu nahe treten, hatte nur vorher Ärger mit einen anderen Mapper...
dónal (2020-12-16 11:19:04+00:00): LGTM. thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95935174
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-20 19:07:06+00:00): سلام
ضمن سپاس از شما بابت تصحیح و ثبت نقشه، در صورت اقدام جهت ثبت اسم کارخانه‌ها، روی محیط صنعتی کلیک و اقدام ثبت اسم برای کل محدوده کارخانه نمایید، نه فقط یک ساختمان از یک کارخانه
Frans S (2020-12-16 12:01:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rather fine and accurate. In a few occasions you your mappings were oversized.
Please follow also the outlines of a buildings precise,  Buildings have often an extention.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95935472
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 18:56:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106604898 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some dubious edits (including inappropriate trunk roads) in Spain.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-16 17:31:40+00:00): Hallo Dampfmodus, willkommen bei OSM!

Deine zwei Änderungen waren leider nicht ganz korrekt, ich habe sie deshalb für dich korrigiert.
Meine Änderungen kannst du hier betrachten:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95956032

Im Zuge meiner Korrekturen habe ich auch gleich noch ein paar Infos von eurer Website hinzugefügt und den Gebäudeumriss aktualisiert.

Solange du dir bei Änderungen nicht sicher bist, setze am besten das Häkchen bei "Bearbeitungen überprüfen lassen", so wie du das bei deiner zweiten Änderung bereits getan hast.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Frans S (2020-12-16 12:09:41+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here
Did you read the instructions ?
This is a building only project. Roads will be subject of other projects
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95935815
eggie (2020-12-16 11:54:49+00:00): Mapper.. let op .. In dit onderdeel zit een BUG die de fietsroutering frustreert.
Zie Issue Ad whether there are cycleways
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/2310

gr eggie
canfe (2020-12-17 07:53:14+00:00): Le vie Facta e Frola contengono un'abbreviazione
canfe (2020-12-17 07:56:01+00:00): metti IV novembre come
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80716819
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-16 17:57:16+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2855314 ?

Nie wiem co z tym zrobić
Jez Nicholson (2020-12-16 14:35:29+00:00): Oh really?! I'd like to see you drive a car up that. It's a footpath.
Jez Nicholson (2020-12-16 15:06:56+00:00): Ach, sorry, that is just further down. This is a driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95949338
rjjaura (2020-12-18 03:25:59+00:00): Hi Jez Nicholson,
I have assumed the connection from the service road as the imagery was blurred hence added it as a service road. Thanks for your time in looking into my edit and correcting it. We appreciate the local knowledge improvising our edits. Happy to learn from community.
Regards,
Supaplex030 (2020-12-18 12:18:52+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
ich habe hier an dem Tor nochmal "entrance=yes" durch "barrier=gate" ersetzt. Das ist eigentlich die üblichere Weise, um ein Tor zu kennzeichnen, "entrance" ist eher bei Gebäuden üblich (oder höchstens an "Eingangstoren" zu umschlossenen Gebieten wie einem Park). So kenne ich es jedenfalls...
liebe Grüße
Alex
StefanHRT (2020-12-18 12:26:22+00:00): Hallo Alex,
Danke für die Info, dann werde ich mich diesbezüglich auch einmal einlesen. Bin ehrlich gesagt von ausgegangen, das ein Tor nur bei Wegen hinkommt, wo auch Autos rein könnten und das andere einfach nur Türen als Zugänge sind, wieder was gelernt.
VG
Stefan
s8evq (2020-12-16 18:33:04+00:00): Hey Hans-M-D-F-J-4. Would you mind adding changeset comments? That way, it's easier for fellow mappers to review your edits. Thanks.
eggie (2020-12-16 12:43:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Alleen een naam zal niets doen in OSM. Wel kun je toevoegen leisure=garden. Dat kan ook op een vlak dat je intekent.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Priti25 (2020-12-16 11:36:33+00:00): Used Bing Aerial Imagery