piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-09-28 20:21:25+00:00): tag shop=deli toegevoegd.. rest aangepast en info verplaatst naar adresnode.
Groet
eggie
cserpell (2022-09-29 22:51:01+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por el aporte, ya que no estaba la información de ciclovías en Curauma/Placilla. Quería confirmar si éstas van separadas de la calle, o en algún caso van por la calle (como la de 2 Poniente en Viña del Mar). En caso de que eso ocurra, se deben etiquetar en la misma línea de la calle. Saludos,
ڕاستی (2022-09-29 23:18:29+00:00): باشە برا خێرە ناوی فارسییەکەی ئەم شەقامەت سڕیەوەتەوە؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126754561
LockOnGuy (2022-09-29 23:50:11+00:00): Yes because we can not have a descriptive name, Also it was wrong. So I added the official name.. Regards.
user_5359 (2022-10-01 04:05:14+00:00): Hello! Don’t use the addr:* keys for name of a street  and location information.

Olá! Não utilize o endereço:* chaves para o nome de uma rua e informação de localização.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-28 21:06:28+00:00): Wycofuję. OSM to nie miejsce do testów.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 13:14:41+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126755935
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-28 21:06:34+00:00): Wycofuję. OSM to nie miejsce do testów.
MrX_ua (2022-09-28 20:55:38+00:00): That is Pykovets
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 14:36:53+00:00): Ciao. C'è qualcosa di sbagliato nel sentiero 10A. Dal tagging, dovrebbe terminare al Passage du Grand Neyron, invece termina a Levionaz, come la relazione 12794047. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:00:17+00:00): non è così, la 14602150 inizia a Levionaz ed è come descritto, invece il problema che vedo è la 12794047 (che va nell'altro verso) ha un cai_scale di EE mentre la versione più piccola e completamente contenuta ha cai_scale=EEA. Va indagato e risolto.

grazie,
Martin
user_2066394 (2022-09-29 15:09:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Lejun (2022-09-29 07:02:33+00:00): Salut et merci pour la contribution. Y a beaucoup de modifications, les informations (en particulier les `proposed`) viennent d’où ? Tu peux m’en dire un peu plus sur ce qu’il se passe à l’aérodrome que tu a supprimé et transformé en zone commerciale ?
Liamcv (2022-09-29 11:24:00+00:00): Ah excuser moi je pensais pouvoir exporter la carte pour un projet de sig étudiant mais ça ne fonctionne pas je remet la carte en etat
Liamcv (2022-09-29 12:04:31+00:00): Techniquement tout a été Remis en l'Etat
Lejun (2022-09-29 16:01:56+00:00): Ça marche aucun soucis. Pour être sur je suis repassé dessus pour tout annuler
bxl-forever (2022-09-29 14:00:14+00:00): Hello,

Many mistakes in this changeset, we are now busy trying to figure out what you wanted to do, and remove corrupted data.  In this one and your other changesets of yesterday, you broke a bus shelter, moved areas, created polygons on top of existing structures, and filled names instead of using tags (such as "Zone nature" and many others).

Perhaps I could suggest retaking the tutorial, or that you only attempt to do minor changes to the database instead of trying to play with large structures.
Senior55 (2022-09-29 14:11:23+00:00): Hello, this green area actually houses 3 different spaces. a public space "Managed Forest", a private space fenced with walls and grids "Zone nature" and a cemetery. The "AIV Digital hoogtemodel Vlanderen hoogview factor 0.25m" map clearly shows the walled "nature zone" space which does not appear on the base map. So I tried, in this map modification, to clearly define the 3 different spaces. Sorry for the bus shelter I moved.
philippec (2022-09-28 21:47:24+00:00): Houthalen toerismebureau AED.
De Imgur lukt niet, zowel in data als in edit.
dentonny (2022-09-28 22:34:50+00:00): Bij mij geen enkel probleem?
dentonny (2022-09-29 08:16:20+00:00): En nu?
philippec (2022-09-29 08:52:26+00:00): Met https://imgur.com/ukseoQHh
lukt het niet, wel met 
https://i.imgur.com/ukseoQHh.jpg
dentonny (2022-09-29 11:12:41+00:00): dan staat de tag toch juist? Raar..
philippec (2022-09-29 12:09:25+00:00): Het is niet de eerste keer dat dit probleem zich voordoet.  Ik gebruik Mapcomplete om een Imgur toe te voegen als de AED niet van buitenuit fotografeerbaar is.
dentonny (2022-09-30 22:03:44+00:00): Volgens mij zit er in bug in ID.
Als je rechtstreeks op de link klikt, ofwel in osm, ofwel in de editor, dan wordt je verkeerd doorgestuurd.
Kopieer je de link als tekst, en deze dan in een browser plakt, dan werkt het wel
philippec (2024-06-28 14:15:22+00:00): Een vreemdeling heeft uw imgur gewist.  Indoor mapillary lukt bij mij tegenwoordig meestal.
bxl-forever (2022-09-29 13:31:45+00:00): No names on areas like this one, please.  "Potagé" (I guess the correct spelling is "Potager", right?) is at most a description and not the name.

Fixed by changeset 126778841
canfe (2022-10-10 07:19:40+00:00): L'indirizzo del ristorante non corrisponde: non c'è nessuna strada cascina Margherita.
Metti add:place: Cascina Margherita e stacca su di un nodo il ristorante e lascia l'edificio coi suoi tag propri.
Così è più corretto e facile da gestire se il ristorante dovesse spostarsi.
RinBalzo (2022-10-12 08:46:04+00:00): Sul sito (anticamargherita.it) l'indirizzo riportato è Strada Cascina Margherita 1, però non sono riuscito a localizzare la strada.
bxl-forever (2022-09-29 12:50:04+00:00): The database does not understand random French words on objects.

Tagged as:
leisure=playground
playground=sandpit
Hufkratzer (2022-09-30 10:35:08+00:00): Hi, regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098682552: surface=asphalt is very uncommon as a surface for riding arenas. Sure?
VulpesInculta (2022-10-03 19:30:41+00:00): Hello,
I am not very experienced in the world of horse riding arenas so I just judged this based off satellite appearance.
Please change it if I'm wrong
Hufkratzer (2022-10-03 22:11:14+00:00): done, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126961379
Enock4seth (2023-05-21 16:29:02+00:00): map the footprint of building not every tiny change in the roof shape, can you try to fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098687481
Baloo Uriza (2022-09-29 21:50:55+00:00): Please actually adjust the geometry to match the buildings; don't just blindly copy over from MapWithAI.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126757861
KeganRobloxMC (2023-07-11 08:56:36+00:00): Baloo Uriza
Okay i am sorry for the delay as i havent been on for a while but i will keep this in mind when using MapWithAI. going foward. Thanks for your input
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126757861
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-29 12:03:52+00:00): Moin smarties,

dies hier ist keine Brücke, sondern der Bach fließt durch eine Röhre (Tunnel) unter der Straße durch. Das hatte ich bereits korrigiert. Warum Du die Geländer auch gelöscht hast erschließt sich mir nicht.

Ich werde Deine Änderung daher wieder zurücksetzen.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco

P.S.: Vielleicht magst Du noch auf meine Frage hier antworten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126382252
PasosDeJesus (2022-09-29 12:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126778981.
user_11609320 (2022-09-28 23:46:40+00:00): not sure if my edit for the lemonite/i-15 on ramp is correct. it is 3 eastbound through lanes, a bike land and a secondary link into the freeway
user_11609320 (2022-09-28 23:47:07+00:00): lane not land
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-29 09:31:34+00:00): Ciao. Premessa: in OSM i valori di accesso (per e.s. bicycle=no o access=private) descrivono autorizzazioni/restrizioni legali e pertanto devono seguire la segnaletica. Non devono basarsi su congetture o descrive l'uso comune o tipico. access=private non significa che la strada è privata ma che l'accesso è limitato (sulla wiki: "note that access=private records that access is restricted, not whether or not the object is privately owned"). Detto questo, il tag access vale per qualsiasi tipo di accesso: a piedi, in bici, a cavallo, in macchina, in bus, col caravan, ecc. Non è necessario né utile aggiungere foot=private, bicycle=private, ... Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126758546
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-29 09:40:34+00:00): Ciao.
Contrariamente alla comune credenza, disegnare gli edifici non è affatto semplice. Innanzitutto bisogna seguire la forma del tetto e poi riportare quanto fatto sulla base, come spiegato qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Roof_modelling 

Inoltre, gli edifici moderni hanno angoli rettangoli. Pertanto dovresti usare l’apposito strumento per ortogonalizzare gli angoli in iD: https://learnosm.org/it/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ 

I numeri civici non devono essere inseriti sugli edifici. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Posiziona quindi un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Una nota sul tag addr:unit. Questo è usato per indicare l'interno (se è presente, se non è presente, come nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi, non deve essere compilato).

Il tag building:levels=1 indica che c'è solo un piano (il piano terra). Però l'edificio è alto 9m. Un po' troppo per avere un solo piano.

Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-29 09:43:11+00:00): Ciao. L'edificio e la strada si intersecano e hanno anche un nodo in comune. Questo non è corretto. Devi provare a spostare la strada in modo che passi tra gli edifici. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126758890
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
RaccoonFederation (2022-09-29 08:14:35+00:00): Did you visit all these places?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-29 10:13:37+00:00): Ciao. Ora ci sono due differenti "Birreria Amadeus". Una su un edificio e l'altra su un nodo. Questa duplicazione non è corretta. Se il ristorante occupa tutto l'edificio, elimina il nodo. Viceversa, se non occupa tutto l'edificio, elimina i tag relativi. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126759177
felipeeugenio (2022-09-29 13:17:25+00:00): Sergio. NO se mapea para que las cosas tengan mayor visibilidad; Se mapea con los tags correctos.. Por favor no cambiar los tags del ramal. Se usaron esos porque representan la realidad en terreno. El riel fue levantado.
Por otro lado: El nombre que agregaste es real?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126759334
literan (2022-09-29 17:01:38+00:00): Практически во всех точках теги взяты от балды. Часть точек дублирует существующие объекты. Извините, но вот так - тяп-ляп - не надо.

Откачу.
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-09-29 17:17:37+00:00): Этот такой же, скорее всего: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126759453

P.S.
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10059955226
>tourism=attraction name=берлога медведя

Кек. Для кого attraction? Для медведя? xD
literan (2022-09-29 17:29:47+00:00): откатил и его
adrianojbr (2022-09-29 18:00:19+00:00): Olá, AjBelnuovo!

Muito importante suas alterações, principalmente corrigir nome de vias.

Aproveito para alertar que as imagens da Clarity Beta da Esri não são muito atualizadas.

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-29 18:05:27+00:00): Eu tenho usado 3 fontes : a Mapbox , a Esri e a Esri clareadas . Tem outraa com fotos mais atuais ?
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 13:18:16+00:00): A ideia é essa mesma. Dependendo de cada região, uma pode estar mais atualizada que outra.

Em sobradinho, percebi que a Esri clareadas estão mais desatualizadas por causa das vias que foram construídas onde havia açudes a leste da ERS-400.

Por experiência, a Esri clareadas são melhor alinhadas e úteis para mapear onde há muitos edifícios próximos, porém normalmente são mais antigas.

Sugiro sempre que possível usar uma fonte com traços de GPS para confirmar qual a mais alinhada. Às vezes, esses traços também auxiliam em identificar qual é mais atualizada, como nesse caso que mencionei antes. Pelos traços do Strava (fácil de ativar no JOSM, não encontrei configurada no iD), percebe-se que aquelas vias existem onde eram 2 açudes.

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-30 14:43:53+00:00): Eu não consigo usar o JOSM . No meu notebook , ele é muito pesado . Vou ver como usar o GPS .
user_6110846 (2022-11-08 07:06:01+00:00): Prokhorovka est une traduction de merde. La traduction correcte est Prokhorivka
user_6110846 (2022-11-08 07:54:05+00:00): Les traductions pro-russes (russophones ) rappellent l'époque où l'Ukraine était une colonie de la Russie.
user_6110846 (2022-11-08 08:21:30+00:00): Lepliavo est  traduction délirante - nécessaire à juste titre Lipliave 
Je me demande d'où tu sors ces traductions merdiques
Olyon (2022-11-08 16:40:22+00:00): Les traductions viennent de wikidata.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4382206
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4382206
J'ai importé les noms tel quel sans trop me poser de questions... ce n'est pas terrible mais Il y avait trop de noms de ville en cyrillique sur le rendu en français.
https://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=7&lat=49.08827&lon=31.18253&layers=B00000000FFFFFF
N’hésites pas à corriger, tu peux le faire aussi sur wikidata.
user_6110846 (2022-11-09 08:37:20+00:00): https://www.russki-mat.net/trans8.html
aweech (2022-09-29 23:03:21+00:00): Hi,
The E branch only goes to Heath Street, and it's been that way since 1985. You must not have heard the news.
Ktr101 (2022-09-30 02:13:54+00:00): Agreed, as I have been inputting this for OpenRailwayMaps. That said, I want to see what this looks like when it goes live there, so I may or may not be adding some fields.
user4816003805 (2022-10-02 18:07:29+00:00): Hi Kate,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I see in this changeset that you've tried to add the archway on the path to 4.0 Hill.
The node you added though (https://osm.org/node/10059999533/history) was tagged as "leisure=park", which was not the correct tag for it.
This tag is only used for entire parks, not features that might be within a park (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark).
A better tag for the arch might have been "barrier=entrance" (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dentrance), which you would add on the path.

Another small issues is that you tagged the node as "name=arch to 4.0 hill".
In OSM, "name" refers to the actual name of an object, not a description for it.
You might use "description" (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:description) or "note" (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:note) to describe the object instead.

The tagging system in OpenStreetMap can be initially confusing to beginners, but don't be discouraged!
You might check out an application like StreetComplete (https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/), which is a fun game on your phone that involves solving OpenStreetMap "quests".
It's a much easier introduction to editing the map that's less prone to making tagging mistakes.
In fact, StreetComplete is how I got started making edits!

Also, check out the OpenStreetMap Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) for guidance, as well as tutorials like https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Happy mapping!
Frans S (2022-09-30 13:09:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention on accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. (You hardly squared a single building. I checked several changesets)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126760042
fkv (2022-09-29 03:31:26+00:00): meinte Kontrussteig, nicht Martinsteig (nach internal server error durcheinander gebracht)
user_5359 (2022-09-29 07:30:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/548165736/history. Why did you delete the tag highway=tertiary? Please correct this directly!

Smaller hints:
Don't add building inside of a building. 
Please the possibilty to create 90° angles (see right mouse click menue)
Don't add the tag website=facebook.com! At fist: It is wrong side for the teashop and we have a own key ("facebook") for the right facebook site
user_5359 (2022-09-29 08:15:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use the tag lanes=0 see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes#No_lane_markings !
emersonveenstra (2022-09-29 11:14:03+00:00): Hi,

This is incorrect, you must keep the "mph" unit, otherwise km/h is implied. I've reverted this in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126775187
marczoutendijk (2022-09-30 07:37:19+00:00): What does "digitization" mean?
Allison P (2024-09-05 05:24:00+00:00): You added details for a Massachusetts Starbucks location to one in Louisiana https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556106168
impiaaa (2022-09-29 15:23:54+00:00): You've made the lane count inconsistent. You changed "turn:lanes" to have four lanes, but "bicycle:lanes", "change:lanes", and "vehicle:lanes" still have five lanes.
impiaaa (2022-09-29 15:25:45+00:00): Reverted in changeset 126785936
gscscnd (2022-09-29 06:30:47+00:00): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098721949>, <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098721950> — czy te budynki nie powinny mieć bardziej prostokątnych kształtów?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-10-06 05:23:47+00:00): Good day MihaiBenta,

The tag motorcar=* (like all other access tags) should only be used to indicate legal access restrictions. If a street is too narrow for motorcars please use highway=path instead.
MihaiBenta94 (2022-11-24 15:32:19+00:00): Hello Timmy_Tesseract, I have reviewed this case and made the necessary changes in the map, thank you for your observations!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.