piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Felipe Alves (2017-02-03 20:41:52+00:00): Oi, LC, o Colher de Pau não fechou?
Spanholz (2017-01-30 11:40:34+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them. 
Your changesets have been reverted. 
Please refrain from doing such changes if future. Helpfull changes are always welcome! Thanks!
chillly (2017-01-31 10:54:47+00:00): Please use a more descriptive changeset comment not just 'Add Details'. Thanks
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:14:34+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:14:29+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-30 09:18:56+00:00): Hej, przyjrzyj sie tej zmianie: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=460167942 - czy na pewno nie powinno tam być junction=roundabout?
samely (2017-01-31 18:43:21+00:00): Hi Ali, I will proceed to revert this edit.

Regards 
Eliane
Shinigami (2017-02-09 13:21:13+00:00): Hello Frederik,

I just found you have rolled back hours of my work, when I merged loots of little counties to big polygones with same timezone. Unfortunately you did not revert those countries infos, so big part of the USA is without timezone data now. 

Ad mapping of timezones - borders of countries/cities are not visible on the ground too. Next thing, not all TZ boundaries run along existing admin boundaries. 

What about to return those data back and change it in future more sensibly?
woodpeck (2017-02-09 14:06:38+00:00): Admin boundaries and maybe sometimes post code boundaries are the big exceptions; their presence in OSM doesn't mean that we can now map any kind of boundaries that are not visible or verifiable on the ground! This just doesn't scale - we can't add all boundaries that someone might find interesting to OSM, we must rely on those boundaries being defined outside of OSM in terms that can be matched to OSM ("these states/counties have this time zone"). In which area did your time zone boundary not follow an administrative boundary, and which external source did you get the definition from in that case?
Shinigami (2017-02-09 14:32:15+00:00): Having tons of small polygons tagged with TZ instead of one big does not scale too.. And local time is not something one might find interesting but really important thing. It is common in US, that half of state have one TZ, other second. It means tens of counties with one, tens with other. And border goes through one of them and cut it in half, to make it more interesting...

TZ often goes by meridians, rivers, roads... 

Sources - some government sites, wiki, efele.net, ...
Shinigami (2017-02-10 09:31:38+00:00): Could you please rollback your changes?
woodpeck (2017-02-10 11:06:13+00:00): I have reverted my deletions. I still believe it's wrong to map time zones, and all time zone boundaries in OSM should be deleted, but I agree it was premature to delete them nilly-willy. I will bring this matter up for discussion on the tagging mailing list. Please join me there.
woodpeck (2017-03-07 06:46:15+00:00): I have started a discussion on the tagging mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031453.html
user_15552334 (2022-08-28 10:08:14+00:00): when you search openstreetmap  changeset on google this is the first result nice
yzemaze (2017-02-01 09:36:50+00:00): Hi,
wurden die Kreuzungen/Abfahrten der B317 (zur L317 & Nähe Autohof) in Schopfheim tatsächlich derart geändert, dass in Fahrtrichtung Zell (gen Osten) ein Abbiegen nach Norden nicht mehr möglich ist?
Die Luftbilder (maps4bw) sprechen eine deutlich andere Sprache.
Flinx (2017-02-02 14:03:13+00:00): Nein - war ein Fehler. Mal sehen, wie die aktuelle Änderumg wirkt.
yzemaze (2017-02-02 14:44:13+00:00): Nicht wirklich gut... Schau’s dir am besten mal mit JOSM an und lass den Validator laufen. An der Kreuzung am Autohof hat die B317 jetzt eine Lücke, Spuren schneiden sich und Abbiegerestriktionen sind auch teils vermurkst. Ist dort baulich im Vergleich zum Luftbild von maps4bw oder Bing etwas geändert worden? (Falls nein, räume ich da evtl. später mal auf.)
yzemaze (2017-02-02 14:45:46+00:00): Bzgl. der Kreuzung im Westen: Ist dort in Fahrtrichtung Osten ein Abbiegen nach Norden nicht mehr möglich? (Wegen Neubau des Abzweigs weiter westlich und dem zweiten Kreisverkehr Blostweg wäre das für mich aus der Ferne denkbar.)
Flinx (2017-02-02 15:25:51+00:00): Sorry, JOSM geht nicht, weil ich Java Runtime strickt ablehne.
Unter Potlatch sieht das noch einigermassen vernünftig aus.
Fakt ist: Grosse bauliche Veränderungen (seit ca. einem Jahr). Es gibt jetzt eine Beschleunigungsspur in Richtung Zell zwischen den beiden Spuren der B317 und je eine Verzögerungsspur aus Richtung Zell und eine Beschleunigungsspur in Richtung Lörrach. Vielleicht überschreitet die Darstellung aber auch die Möglichkeiten von OSM - oder zu ambitioniert für meine Fähigkeiten.
yzemaze (2017-02-02 18:30:16+00:00): Ok, ich hab’s verstanden und schaue es mir mal an. (Sollte sich sowohl mit lanes als auch separaten ways lösen lassen.)
Eine Skizze der Kreuzung fand sich i. ü. auch noch: https://ais.badische-zeitung.de/piece/03/f8/fc/0d/66649101.gif
R0bst3r (2017-01-30 09:48:18+00:00): Hallo Wow@Osm,
Bürgersteige kann man so eintragen, von vielen Mitschaffenden wird es aber nicht gern gesehen, da Bürgersteig und Straßen von vielen als "ein Weg" gesehen werden.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig

Um deine Wege sinnvoll nutzen zu können, solltest du darauf achten, dass deine Wege auch mit den Straßen und anderen Bürgersteigen verbunden sind, denn sonst sind sie für Fußgängernavigation nicht verwendbar.
Grüße, R0bst3r
Wow@Osm (2017-01-30 10:54:12+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
wieder mal vielen Dank für wertvollen Hinweise. Ich werde in unserem Ort voraussichtlich alle Bürgersteige erfassen. Dabei werde ich künftig auch gleich die entsprechenden Überwege erfassen, damit keine Irritationen auftreten.
Viele Bürgersteige sind aber auch ohne Anschluss! Um Kosten zu sparen hat man das früher so gemacht. Um gefahrlos durch den Ort zu gehen, speziell auch mit Rollstuhl, Rollator, Kinderwagen etc. soll das Routing zu Fuss hier verbessert werden. 
Da ist aber noch einiges zu machen.

Es grüßt der 
Wow@Osm
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-31 08:11:30+00:00): Bei deinen Edits wäre etwas mehr Sorgfalt angebracht. Die Hinterlassenschaften waren mehrere offene Multipolygone, fehlende Relation-Tags(inner/outer), gleiche Tags auf inner und outer.
Evtl würde auch die Umstellung deines Tagingvorgehens helfen, um nicht unnötige Multipolygone zu erzeugen. Nahezu alles was da erstellt wurde, ließe sich mit einem normalen Landuse erzeugen, anstatt - vor allem mit Potlatch- schwerer zu beherschende Multipolygone zu erzeugen, die dann entweder ein Liniensegment zuviel oder zu wenig haben.......
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:14:16+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Martin Borsje (2017-01-30 17:03:56+00:00): Ik neem aan dat de de naam toegevoegd hebt. Dank.

Maar om nou als commentaar "De naam!!!!" te gebruiken....

Een beetje overdone?

Groeten

Martin Borsje
ue0 (2017-02-01 10:38:58+00:00): 2 спорт площадки в лесу? точно не ошибка?
Владимир К (2017-02-01 11:10:31+00:00): а если это какие-нибудь турники, то должно быть leisure=fitness_station
D-new (2017-02-02 10:28:14+00:00): OK, поправил
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Constable (2017-01-30 12:20:00+00:00): Sir, your changeset comments are still inaccurate; this one as example, has nothing to do with Robecchetto con Induno.
Please begin using proper changeset comments, specifying what did you do, just like "aligned roads to Bing images", "create building", "added road",.,
thanks
Constable (2017-01-30 12:20:29+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Constable (2017-02-19 10:49:57+00:00): Still waiting for your answer
Constable (2017-05-06 13:56:35+00:00): uh
L'imaginaire (2017-01-30 13:52:02+00:00): I don't think this was "Pokemon inspired nonsense". My guess would be it was someone who wanted to map his/her own house/garden in detail. Lots of improvements possible, but removing everything does not seem the right way to motivate this person to continue mapping.
zors1843 (2017-01-30 13:56:36+00:00): Ok, ik draai het terug.  Weet wel dat ik iedere dag veel tijd besteed aan dit soort onzin.
Het aantal nieuwe hit and run mappers is de laatste tijd spectaculair gestegen, nadat het gerucht de ronde doet dat Pokemon openstreetmap zou gebruiken.
L'imaginaire (2017-01-30 14:00:29+00:00): Alle begrip voor! Maar gezien een andere changeset van deze user die wel nuttige data bevatte, lijkt me dit iemand die misschien nog wel iets kan betekenen voor OSM.
L'imaginaire (2017-01-30 14:07:06+00:00): Ik heb een beetje opgekuist, zodat de nonsens eruit zijn, maar de gebruiker wel nog zijn eigen zwembad zal terugvinden :-)
user_5359 (2017-01-30 14:53:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-30 14:53:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
samely (2017-01-31 19:11:20+00:00): Hi 멍게Y 이, 
Thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it.

Regards, 
Eliane
nyuriks (2017-02-27 08:15:18+00:00): Hi, what is "Vivasaya pannai" ? is it one of these, or something different?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-30 17:10:13+00:00): Hi 박성호, welcome to OSM. Your changeset looks strange. Could you please explain your edits? #pleasereview local contributor.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45645607
Glassman (2017-01-30 16:59:21+00:00): To help people find the store please add an appropriate tag such as shop=convenience or shop= whatever it is they sell. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
Hjart (2017-01-30 10:17:04+00:00): Bemærk at "park" i denne sammenhæng betyder noget helt andet end du tilsyneladende i dette tilfælde har forestillet dig
jinalfoflia (2017-04-11 09:36:59+00:00): Hi DearMiss,

Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! The buildings (Apartments) that you have added need to drawn (Traced) according to the imagery. Here is a guide you can refer while mapping such apartments/buildings - https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-common-features/#buildings

Can you please correct the shape of the buildings that you have added in this region?

Best,

Jinal Foflia
user_5359 (2017-01-30 14:52:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
tux67 (2017-01-30 13:43:02+00:00): Hi Flitzek,
willkommen bei OSM. Super, daß du zur Verbesserung der OSM Daten beiträgst. Solltest du Interesse haben weitere Beiträge zu leisten, so wären zum beispiel die Hausummern in deiner Umbebung ein guter Einstieg ;-) .
Hier ein paar links die helfen können, falls Interesse besteht:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2012/01/von-einem-der-auszog-viel-zu-viele-hausnummern-zu-mappen/

Oder mal hier nach Bad Harzburg suchen und die View "Adresses" auswählen, um zu sehen, was in deiner unmittelbaren Umgebung fehlt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/

Gruß und viel Spass
Stephan (tux67)
Luuuddooo (2017-01-30 12:08:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne pense pas qu'on puisse qualifier ces deux zones comme étant des forêts :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470168998
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470168999

Il s'agit juste d'une rangée d'arbre avec du béton et du goudron.
Je pense qu'il serait plus approprié de tracer une simple ligne avec le tag natural=tree row http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree_row

Ludo.
L3mp1ck4 (2017-01-30 13:12:09+00:00): Bonjour Ludo,

Merci pour la précision, c'est corrigé ! 

Marcelline
Luuuddooo (2017-01-30 15:22:53+00:00): Parfait, merci !
daveemtb (2017-07-19 14:47:55+00:00): Are you sure the pavements on the western side of Southgate Avenue are cycle paths? My recollection is that they are not. The cycle path is on the eastern side. Happy to be corrected if it's changed recently! :)
user_5359 (2017-01-30 14:48:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre , too.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 09:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 10:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 02:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 03:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
DD1GJ (2017-01-30 10:26:29+00:00): Alles zürückgesetzt!

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
Spanholz (2017-01-31 16:08:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

please connect the footways to the streets, else there will be no pedestrian routing,

Have a look here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway
BigFreaky (2017-02-01 03:18:43+00:00): Hello, thank you for the welcome. As you see I've added quite a bit of pathways and am working daily to make sure all is covered. I am assuming you are mentioning some of my open ends that I haven't tied up yet? Also, footways connecting to a crossing, to another path thru the street is acceptable, correct? Thanks.
Spanholz (2017-02-01 08:34:59+00:00): Impressing work! I changed the crossing South 5th Street/Clinton Street to give you an example. 

Are there really zebra crossings there? If yes, then it's mapped right.
If not, then just a highway=crossing.But I'm not familiar with the laws in the US. 

Have a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
BigFreaky (2017-02-01 08:50:43+00:00): Those crossings would probably have zebra if they were to be made in the last 5ish years. They are ped crossing, and typically have at least lines. As you can see the town is very small, and it would probably cost a fortune to zebra every street. Newer ones or ones in higher traffic areas seem to get zebras now days. We do well in the city, but the economic collapse within the last 10 years puts many things on the back burner. I want my city to have the most accurate info available for everyone.  Thanks for the help.
apm-wa (2017-02-27 03:59:23+00:00): Это не больница.  Это ликеро-водочный завод.  This is not a hospital.  It is the alcoholic beverage (spirits) factory.
user_5359 (2017-01-30 11:43:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:14:09+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
user_5359 (2017-01-30 11:43:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path.

An ways, which are drivable with cars aren’t footway.
corfede (2017-02-07 23:35:42+00:00): Eliminare strade, rotatorie e fabbricati già correttamente mappati non è un buon modo per contribuire ad OSM. Ti prego di fare più attenzione con gli edit.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:13:48+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
user_5359 (2017-01-30 11:30:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Miselajus (2017-02-03 22:44:29+00:00): Hallo,
tatsächlich ist ein Wald ein sehr geeigneter Ort, um zur Ruhe zu kommen, um sich zu besinnen, um nachzudenken (auch über Dinge, die man in OSM falsch gemacht hat), auch um ein Gebet zu sprechen aus Dankbarkeit oder weil die Sorgen plagen.
Dennoch macht dies in OSM aus einem landuse=forest kein place_of_worship.
Ich habe deshalb diesen Änderungssatz und andere von dem Tage revertiert.
Deine anderen changesets habe ich "zu Fuß" anhand Luftbild überprüft und falls nötig korrigiert. Falls mir dabei ein Fehler unterlaufen ist, lasse es mich wissen.
Gruß M.
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-30 12:38:47+00:00): Popsułeś granicę, proszę o naprawienie http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3325684#map=14/49.9675/19.7829
Grzegorz Stachura (2017-01-30 15:21:26+00:00): Czy chodzi o brak przerwy od Zelczyny jeśli tak to wprowadzilem poprawkę. Jeśli coś jeszcze to proszę doradzić co zmienić. Prosze o wyrozumiałość, dopiero zaczynam mapować.
Enock4seth (2019-06-24 06:34:29+00:00): Hi Dan,
Can you please clarify what you were actually trying to map?
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Commodoortje (2017-01-30 19:42:49+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.