piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-04-18 18:40:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
RicoElectrico (2020-04-18 17:49:43+00:00): Hej, póki co nie ruszaj proszę innych obiektów z tego importu miejsc historycznych. Teraz to revertuję. Dzięki!
aweech (2020-04-18 19:37:30+00:00): Thank you! That's the way to do it. Happy mapping! :)
trigpoint (2020-04-18 20:42:35+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit however it has gone a little wrong and I have reverted it.

Shrewsbury School was already correctly mapped, it is not one big building.

Please continue to map but only add things that exist in real life.

Cheers Phil
RicoElectrico (2020-04-18 17:58:05+00:00): Proszę o zaprzestanie edycji na tym koncie oraz koncie josskeylor do czasu wyjaśnienia sytuacji. W innym przypadku nałożę na nie blokadę.
Stefan Paluch (2020-04-18 18:53:54+00:00): Nie używam konta josskeylor, możesz z nim robić co uznasz za stosowne; te węzły usunąłem kiedy przyjrzałem im się w lidar - wygląda na to że są na środku pola i nic tam nie ma.
HattedMapper (2021-12-31 14:17:31+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
Ich bin gerade über den Bahnübergang K9/Maximiliansbahn südlich von Neustadt gestolpert. Wie es scheint wird die Strecke dort durch deine Änderung eingleisig. Das war und ist ziemlich sicher falsch. Kannst du das nochmal prüfen?
Nakaner (2022-01-01 13:45:42+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe das soeben korrigiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
!bm (2020-04-18 21:00:26+00:00): Hallo Marsupium, welchen Typs soll diese Relation sein? Multipolygon-Sammelrelation? --besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83751563
kartonage (2020-04-21 06:18:18+00:00): Ich sehe hier keinen gesonnderten Sinn in der Relation, außer dem Zusammenhang, dass es ein Unternehmen ist. Die Tags sind auf jeden Fall nicht korrekt so.

Leider auch keine Antwort.
pio2_122 (2020-04-18 18:50:04+00:00): Co oznacza tag grave_food?
km2bp (2020-04-18 19:50:17+00:00): Dzięki że zauważyłeś literówkę Już poprawione   na gave_food
4004 (2020-04-27 00:00:41+00:00): но там же вроде как кирпичи https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=WiU8-KUGze_55ZBVWrYLww&focus=photo ?
SyrexBrest (2020-04-27 03:28:48+00:00): На фото выезд со стоянки.
4004 (2020-04-28 01:52:48+00:00): Там и со стороны нарочи вроде кирпич висит. Сам сидел и наблюдал, что ездят по всякому, включая и под оба кирпича. Посмотрим, может через пару лет ещё кто придёт со своим видением, но ваша правка логичная
Hjart (2020-04-18 20:04:12+00:00): The Silkeborg end of Trækstien was mapped since quite a few years, so I've deleted your new relation and added the ways to the older relation
orko10 (2020-04-25 17:43:08+00:00): Tak for info og ændringer. 
Faktisk har jeg tilføjet ny sti fra Tange Værket ti Bjerringbro først. Og bagefter - tilføjet ny relation, fordi jeg kan ikke vælge eksisterende relation (i dropboksen kunne  jeg ikke finde eksisterende relation ).
Lidt senere har jeg tilføjet relation fra Tange til syd fra Ans.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-04 11:39:58+00:00): Hallo Chimbofranz,

wie kommst du auf den Wert "permit" für den access-Tag dieses Weges https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793281470 ? Ist das dort wirklich so ausgeschildert mitten im Wald?

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
Chimbofranz (2020-05-04 17:59:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde das ändern.

Viele Grüsse
Chimbofranz
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-05 06:35:49+00:00): Keine Ursache. Im iD-Editor sieht es leider immer so aus, als würden die access-Werte erwartet werden. In den meisten Fällen sind aber für jeden Wegtyp bereits die korrekten Standardwerte gesetzt, die nur ergänzt werden müssen, wenn dies so ausgeschildert ist, wenn also z.B. ein Waldweg explizit für Pferde gesperrt ist.

Es gibt auch ein superpraktisches Tool für diesen Zweck, habe ich auch erst vor kurzem entdeckt: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
Gerne mal anschauen.

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
mapman44 (2020-04-18 21:48:44+00:00): Just a tip...the point with the address should be where the house is actually located, not attached to the road. Thanks.
jrhoward (2020-04-18 23:11:52+00:00): Thanks.  I submitted a change to manually undo the prior change.

The intent was to make an address "searchable" by the town name (Becker) instead of requiring someone to enter the county name (Sherburne County).  The point indicated the location of the mailbox/driveway, not the house.

If I were to mark the actual (off-road) house location, would it become searchable (e.g. useful for navigation), or are there additional steps necessary to link it to the road?

I was trying to follow the recommendations in https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/36162/street-address-dont-come-up-in-searches ..but should probably do a bit more reading/research before making additional changes.
pyrog (2020-04-18 20:29:48+00:00): Bonsoir,

Merci de ne pas effacer les n° de rue pour les passer sur les bâtiments.

Un bâtiment (ou un POI quelconque) n'a pas besoin d'avoir des tags addr:*=* pour déterminer son adresse.

Cordialement,

Yves
tbarthelet (2020-04-18 20:47:29+00:00): Bonsoir,
J'applique la recommandation du schéma Karlsruhe : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses
Vu le nombre d'adresses mal placées que je corrige, je pense plutôt que c'est l'inverse, l'adresse doit être au plus près du lieu qu'elle qualifie et non à côté de la route.
pyrog (2020-04-19 07:44:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Karlsruhe est en Allemagne ;)
Chaque pays a son modèle, chez nous c'est "BANO".
Les adresses sont des noeuds qui correspondent en général à la plaque de n° de rue, placée soit en façade, soit près des boites à lettres.

Repositionner les n° au plus près de leur position "réelle" est une bonne chose, et je t'en remercie :)
Les mettre dans les polygones en est une autre.

Si tu affiches la couche Bano sur le fond de carte OSM, tu constateras que le 4 rue de Pavigny se retrouve maintenant au centre du bâtiment historique des thermes, bien loin de son entrée principale.

En ville des bâtiments peuvent avoir plusieurs routes d'accès. En collant le numéro sur le polygone, ça ne permet pas de localiser facilement son accès principal.

Je te propose de discuter de ce point et d'OSM en général sur Lons après la levée du confinement, soit à distance en audio ou visio.

En attendant, peux-tu faire un revert de toutes tes modifications de n° de rue ?
Merci d'avance.

Cordialement,
Yves
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83753526
tbarthelet (2020-04-19 09:05:43+00:00): Bonjour Yves,
OK pour la discussion téléphonique à ce sujet.
Ca n'est toujours pas clair pour moi. Il n'est fait mention de ce consensus ni sur le wiki Adresse, ni sur celui de la BANO. La seule source que j'ai trouvée qui mentionne ce concept de référencement le long de la voirie est sur le guide d'adressage à destination des communes (concept de PAN, page 32, https://www.craig.fr/sites/www.craig.fr/files/documents/3426-mettre-en-place-une-demarche-dadressage_/guidev1fr-1-modifdu29052018vf.pdf). 

Le traitement BAN génère des erreurs fixme quand le POI adresse est au bord de la route et trop éloigné de la parcelle (plusieurs cas dans les maisons de ville).

Thomas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83753526
mapping_dave (2020-04-18 19:31:13+00:00): Das ist natürlich ein Geldautomat. Da war ich bei der Beschreibung zu schnell beim hochladen.
mapman44 (2020-04-18 21:44:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
Carnildo (2020-04-19 08:27:19+00:00): Not all imagery is created equal.  In the case of the Numerica bank, the only imagery new enough to show it when I added it was "DigitalGlobe Standard", the only redeeming feature of which is that it's generally quite recent -- it's also very blurry and poorly-aligned.

Nowadays, we've got high-quality Bing imagery (I think it's about nine months old) and Esri imagery (three months older than Bing), and there's another aerial survey going on right now -- with luck, we'll have access to it in a few months.
DressyPear4 (2020-04-20 04:15:29+00:00): Por que continua editando dessa forma, sendo que já foi orientada a não fazer isso?
Se continuar vou pedir bloqueio
mueschel (2020-04-19 11:17:47+00:00): Hi,
what do you want to express with the tag 'gave_food = only'? It's not used in other places and I don't understand it.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-18 23:16:40+00:00): Hello Lepuse
Can you please ensure that you use meaningful changeset comments. This is important, especially in a politically charged area such as this one. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-18 23:17:06+00:00): 你好Lepuse
您能确保使用有意义的变更集注释吗？ 这一点很重要，尤其是在像这样的政治领域。 有关更多信息，请参见https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments。
最好的祝福，
Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。
mapman44 (2020-04-18 21:40:21+00:00): Just a tip...houses look much better with square corners. You can square them up by selecting and then pressing the Q key. Thanks.
mapman44 (2020-04-18 21:38:22+00:00): Thanks for your contributions in OpenStreetMap! Although Bing imagery is newer, it has some distortion and doesn't line up well with GPS. ESRI Clarity (Beta) usually has a much better alignment. You may want to make sure your background satellite imagery is lined up with the existing streets in the neighborhood. This Wiki page explains why and how: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
tbarthelet (2020-04-21 08:12:04+00:00): Le Cabinet Granvelle est au 9bis, de l'autre côté du quai Thurel.
Je me suis permis de corriger.
lmagreault (2020-04-21 14:07:27+00:00): Merci pour ta vigilance. J'ai vraiment regardé ce tronçon de rue sans penser à jeter un coup d’œil de l'autre côté du carrefour...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83754941
philippec (2020-04-30 21:00:44+00:00): Op 23 april zie ik hier nog geen enkele auto over rijden.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/4Ofo1V9ZKyXDOB4kIBotpg
Volgens de gazet opent het pas vandaag 30 april. https://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20200430_04940927/nieuwe-fly-over-op-zwart-kruispunt-r6-opent-voor-ons-blijft-het-een-te-mijden-plek
 En u zegt 18 april.
Waarom opent u de brug 12 dagen te vroeg ?
U schrijft alleen "update" in uw changeset comment.
ma-rt-in (2020-04-19 22:55:46+00:00): Hallo,
laut DK5 war der Way 777011731 richtig benannt. Woher stammt den deine Info?
vg
mueschel (2020-04-19 08:48:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!
the objects you added here don't have any valid tag. This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a look at the wiki about common tags.

What is the source of the data? It can't be from aerial photos as you state. Data can only be used for OSM if it is available under a license that is compatible with ODbL.

This seems to be an import of data, so it has to follow the Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
IanH (2020-04-19 16:00:59+00:00): Looks good, keep up the good work
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83755516
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 10:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84099081 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83755876 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
mikini (2020-04-19 00:39:42+00:00): Takker, så det lige selv da jeg gennemgik mine seneste ændringer. Det kommer af Vespucci Android-editoren (https://vespucci.io/) der har en irriterende "address prediction"-feature der autotilføjer adresse hvis man ikke passer på.
kartonage (2020-04-21 09:39:20+00:00): Hej  joe2812,

es wäre sinnvoll die Quellenangabe entsprechend der Vorgabe zu verwenden.
Siehe: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=783554#p783554 & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Schöne Grüße
compdude (2020-04-18 22:34:09+00:00): I think it's a bit of a stretch to consider Mukilteo Speedway a trunk road as there are too many driveways and intersections and though it's divided, it's more like a typical urban arterial than an expressway with at grade intersections. I agree with having that part of SR 526 and Paine Field Blvd marked as trunk, but not Mukilteo Speedway, so I'm going to change that back to primary.
FasterTracker (2020-12-29 02:36:23+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the contribution!

I've stumbled upon this changeset because of the weird name of one of the objects you added to OSM. What were your sources for this one?
chrislybaer (2020-04-19 11:58:23+00:00): Hello srinjoy-dutta,
Please use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners of buildings as described in the description of the hot task.
Good luck and greetings,
chrislybaer
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:57:29+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
mapman44 (2020-04-19 01:41:41+00:00): The houses are looking much better. Thanks for working on that.  You may want to make sure your background satellite imagery (Bing) is lined up properly with the existing streets in the area. This Wiki article explains why and how to do it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
trigpoint (2020-04-20 18:22:55+00:00): Hi, please do not delete schools and redraw as houses. I have reverted this changeset.
mariotomo (2020-12-02 17:07:25+00:00): Hola!  I'm reviewing this area, checking the usage of highway=track and replacing it with whatever function the road has, and if possible adding surface paved/unpaved/compacted.
I'll be happy to chat with you, and refine our mapping habits.
trigpoint (2020-04-20 18:18:15+00:00): Hi, in openstreetmap we map what exists on the ground. This appears to be fiction, we do not add things that will be removed later. 
 Vandalism reverted
ralley (2020-04-19 01:22:03+00:00): Why have you tagged  paths as layer=-1 when they don't appear from the aerial imagery to be below other objects and are not tagged as tunnels?  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83757709
Duja (2020-04-20 13:57:05+00:00): So what? Over 1000 places across Serbia has multiple official local names. Having them overloaded into single name tag is unwieldy, affects rendering and breaks searching and nomenclature. Please leave name tag  at Cyrillic, there's plenty of alternative name: tags.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-20 17:16:29+00:00): Ciao Michele. Dubito che questo sia un campo coltivato, all'interno dell'abitato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793327777 Ciao, Andrea
AndriesWijma (2020-04-19 02:13:31+00:00): Goedzo, deze fout had ik maanden geleden al gemeld aan de betreffende mapper:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=772417#p772417
Horza (2020-04-20 00:50:29+00:00): Nice to see more people doing houses around here, really is so much to be done :)
Nakaner (2020-05-22 07:31:35+00:00): Hallo,

wie ist denn der Status des Ausbaus dieses Wegs? Ist er fertig und freigegeben oder wird daran gerade noch gebaut?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160726411

Du hast den Weg bislang eingetragen, als sei er fertig (nämlich als Radweg, nicht als in Bau befindliche Straße). Wenn er aber noch nicht freigegeben ist, wäre das falsch.

Viele Grüße

Michael
JandaM (2020-10-09 12:14:39+00:00): Dobry den, prosim neprevadejte adresni body na adresy budov. Dekuji M
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:49:27+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BenPortner (2020-04-19 03:04:15+00:00): source code here: https://github.com/BenPortner/osm_powiats_add_tags
Footyfootfella (2020-04-29 20:19:50+00:00): Hello JaLooNz,

I have noticed that you have been adding service = parking_aisle or service = driveway tags to roads that could carry through traffic. For example on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638188976, I noticed you reclassified the residential road to a service = parking_aisle.  However, adjacent to it on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171064155 the residential was left alone, although it follows the same criteria as the way you changed to service = parking_aisle.

I’m curious to know your rationale for these highway classification changes. 

Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Retired Account (2020-04-30 01:22:51+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638188976 consist of roads with parking bays beside the road, not used for primary access to other neighbourhoods due to availability of primary road Jalan Kempas Indah.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171064155 consists of residential buildings without visible parking bays, with the road primary for access to the building lots.

I think the differentiating factor will be visibility of parking bays.
Footyfootfella (2020-05-05 16:14:18+00:00): Hi JaLooNz,

Thank you for the feedback!  I think I understand what you’re saying about the existence of parking bays versus not having parking bays.  

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638188976, highway=service is likely the best highway tag.  However, based on my understanding of service=parking_aisle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle) it doesn’t seem to match the expectation for a parking aisle.  Both in the initial summary on that wiki page and under the Disambiguation section it is suggested service=parking_aisle shouldn’t be used for roads which provide through access.  What about making these types of roads highway=service without the service=parking_aisle tag? 

Thank you again for the communication!
BenPortner (2020-04-19 03:05:09+00:00): source code here: https://github.com/BenPortner/osm_powiats_add_tags
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-04-19 03:50:56+00:00): I've tried to fix the P2P routes you've mentioned here but I didn't saw immediately this edit. I've renamed all the UBE Express routes on my edit, and fixed the airport shuttle service (is rather run by MIAA, as what I saw last July, and must be mapped to both serve arrivals and departures).
AndresDuhour (2024-01-17 21:02:22+00:00): Hola! puede ser que la construcción etiquetada como man_made=observatory (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793339144), que sería un observatorio astronómico fuera un mirador?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint

Saludos!

Andrés
user_5359 (2020-04-19 03:49:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the value of opening_hours value! I assume the Mo-Th 15:00-21:00; ... instead Mo-Th 03:00-21:00; ...
BenPortner (2020-04-19 02:59:34+00:00): sourcecode here: https://github.com/BenPortner/osm_powiats_add_tags
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-27 19:27:54+00:00): Czy ta automatyczna edycja była przedyskutowana?

Zerkniesz na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=799365#p799365 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-02 09:12:38+00:00): Have you discussed this automatic import as required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Can you look at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=799365#p799365  ? If you want I can translate the discussion for you.
BenPortner (2020-09-02 19:14:58+00:00): Didn't have a chance to, unfortunately. I sent an email to the mailing list but it never got through. I created a wiki entry though: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/BenPortner  Unfortunately I don't know Polish. What's written in the discussion?
mapman44 (2020-04-19 04:42:02+00:00): Please square up the houses. You know how.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83759503
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-19 10:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83768284 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the South China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3633
blackboxlogic (2020-05-28 22:22:15+00:00): Ouch, this one messed up a city boundary and a national park. I don't think I can fix this. If anyone else finds it, please take a stab at it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83759704
blackboxlogic (2020-05-30 13:42:49+00:00): More detail: The shape of Way202713416 was changed which is boundary=national_park, which is an outer member of "Acadia National Park" Relation2176999. I was mistaken about Bar Harbor's municipal boundary, it wasn't changed in this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83759704
SomeoneElse (2020-04-19 11:01:14+00:00): (for info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3641 )
UPegasus (2025-09-03 14:04:45+00:00): Привіт, Джері!
Ви дарма витрачали свій час на редагування цього трешу. Його варто було видалити, а тег лісу одразу поставити на контур острова.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-06 22:57:06+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11012086

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11012087

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11012088

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11012091

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:49:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2020-04-26 16:13:51+00:00): Hello! it is not necessary to list all languages of Wikipedia articles, as these links are defined within wikipedia.
user_5359 (2020-05-02 20:26:44+00:00): Can you please correct this?
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-04 07:15:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86170648 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83760237 due to usage of a data source without permission of the copyright holder (Bayernatlas).
Kovoschiz (2020-04-19 23:42:23+00:00): Does the regional and district really share the same "major cycle track" name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83760274