piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
IlBano (2022-07-26 10:17:01+00:00): Ciao bbgg,

in questo changeset, che per altro riporta un commento "improvements" che non fornisce nessuna informazione (prima di farne un altro ti consiglio di leggerti https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments), hai apportato una modifica alla zona di via San Giuseppe a Pavia che è basata sulle mappe Bings e non tiene conto delle recenti modifiche apportate alla viabilità della zona. Lì è stata aggiunta una nuova rotatoria e un nuovo tratto di ciclabile che avevo rilevato io in loco. Le tue modifiche sono state fatte senza conoscenza del luogo e basandosi su immagini aree che risalgono ad anni fa. Inoltre hai interrotto diverse relazioni che descrivevano il percorso del bus urbano numero 1.
Ripristinare a mano quanto hai modificato è un lavoro immane che porta via molto tempo, pertanto proverò a fare un revert delle tue modifiche.
Non ho dubbi che tu sia mosso dalla volontà di migliorare la mappa, ma ti pregherei per il futuro di prestare maggiore attenzione e rispetto per il lavoro degli altri. Nello specifico in se avevi dubbi sulla presenza della rotatoria sarebbe bastato leggere il commento al changeset delle mie modifiche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115680623) oppure contattarmi.

IlBano
4004 (2022-05-06 11:21:11+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
адрес указывается через номер дома и улицу, в разных полях. в название пишется имя собственное, его я так подозреваю у дома нет. 
iWowik исправил
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-03 07:51:51+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Cia, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120476099
mariotomo (2022-05-02 19:46:58+00:00): hi. minor hint, if you could keep your changesets a bit smaller, geographically speaking. you're touching the whole world this way.
Sylv1_Durif (2022-05-02 21:30:55+00:00): Sorry... I won't do more...
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-03 07:56:34+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non modificare le sagome degli edifici. Sono state importate dagli open data della Provincia di Biella e sono molto affidabili. Grazie, Andrea
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:22+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:10+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:21+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:04+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
eggie (2022-05-02 21:03:54+00:00): Dag Thijs.. wanneer een weg is opnegesteld ook construction= unclassified verwijderen. 
Je weg kruist het fietspad zonder verbindingsnode.. Hoe loopt de weg in werkelijkheid?

MVG
eggie
thijsdejong (2022-05-02 21:05:52+00:00): Excuus. Ik ben de verbindingsnode dan vergeten. De weg kruis het fietspad. Het fietspad loopt horizontaal, de weg diagonaal.
eggie (2022-05-02 21:08:56+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=02-05-2021&loc=52.00643%2C4.434984%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-03-08&acqid=20220308_103959_SV1-01&sensor=SuperView-1

De verbinding heb ik aangebracht 
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 21:27:29+00:00): 'k Heb even geen idee hoe die Europa laan aansluit of gaat aansluiten op die Van Bluijslaan. Heb 'm even aangepast volgens de laatste sat foto.
Wellicht weet jij meer. Er verandert nog genoeg hier.
Mapse
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:19+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:56+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:17+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:49+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
eggie (2022-05-02 20:57:38+00:00): Oke Frank, maar waarom dan de hele weg verwijderd?
eggie (2022-05-02 20:59:22+00:00): Wat is dan je bedoeling?   Je hebt van xde weg een barrier=yes gemaakt
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120476548

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 21:00:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbus_trap
eggie (2022-05-02 21:11:15+00:00): De weg heb ik hersteld en de barrier=yes verwijderd. De bussluis zal z'n werk gewoon doen. 

MVG
eggie
FrankkieNL (2022-05-02 21:56:33+00:00): Wat was niet mijn bedoeling om de weg te verwijderen. Sorry!
eggie (2022-05-02 21:58:10+00:00): No problem.. Hij is weer terug 😀
martinst (2022-05-03 13:46:07+00:00): Laut dem Kommentar könnte man hier informal=yes ergänzen.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-03 18:54:14+00:00): Your only changeset comment seems to be: "edycja ogolna".
Can you improve on that to help your fellow OSM mappers?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
=====
Wydaje się, że jedynym Twoim komentarzem do changeset jest: "edycja ogolna".
Czy możesz to poprawić, aby pomóc kolegom mapującym OSM?
Proszę przeczytać:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-05-02 20:39:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten. Je kunt niet naar een luchtfoto kijken en een gebouw aanpassen. . Die zijn schuin genomen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:15+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:41+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Glassman (2022-05-03 23:25:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120476834
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:13+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:23+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-02 20:17:54+00:00): Read this wiki page, please.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Sylv1_Durif (2022-05-02 21:25:56+00:00): I would like, but that takes too mutch time to do individually, if you have
Sylv1_Durif (2022-05-02 21:29:04+00:00): a script to cut edits by country or by more smaller region, I'm totally open ! Also, I finished... No more enormeous edits. Even me, it annoys me when I see that. Also thanks for the links I will read this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:10+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:13+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:19:54+00:00): The StatsCan dataset does not give the name Batlersby Road to this entire stretch, and rather only has it on the very southwestern portion.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:08+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:22:05+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:18:27+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground. I do see that Google Maps has a road by this fictional name running southwest past The Q Centre, so I suspect that's where you got this name from.
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:53:25+00:00): Hello.
Since you are editing in US, please write changeset comments in English so that local mappers can understand what you are writing? 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120477228
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:07+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:58+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:17:16+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:04+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:51+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:16:39+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
yrtimiD (2022-05-10 19:33:29+00:00): Hello and welcome, you just added several ways without any tags. Such "empty" ways doesn't contribute much to the map. What you tried to accomplish?
yrtimiD (2022-05-10 19:44:42+00:00): I reverted these, potentially wrong,  changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120808740) if you'll want to continue and fix your original changes - it's easy to undo the revert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:00+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:43+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:15:47+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:58+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:35+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:14:58+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:56+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:28+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:13:00+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:54+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:22+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:12:31+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:53+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:21:16+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
NicoSa (2022-06-22 05:26:45+00:00): Guten Tag Moritz,
die Fritz-Kühn-Str. ist keine öffentliche Strasse. sie ist, wie viele Andere dort, in Geobasisdaten Online nicht hinterlegt und daher auf privatem Grund der Eigentümer und daher mit dem Access destination zu versehen.
elgolfo (2022-06-22 07:34:34+00:00): Moin,

das ist so nicht richtig. Ob ein Weg öffentlich ist oder nicht, hat in OSM nichts mit dem access-Tag zu tun. Und ob ein Weg in irgendwelchen Geobasisdaten hinterlegt ist, ist für das Tagging auch völlig unerheblich. Getaggt wird, was on the ground verifizierbar ist. Das sind Geobasisdaten nicht. Und da vor Ort auch keine Schilder den Zugang einschränken, kann man operator=private bei Privatwegen setzen, access=* nur wenn es weitere Beschilderungen gibt. 
Das Wiki hat da auch was Passendes zu[1]:
> Das Schild "Privatweg" bezieht sich in Deutschland in der Regel auf die Straßenunterhaltungspflicht (Öffentliche Hand/Kommune vs. privater Grundstücksbesitzer) und nicht auf das Wegebenutzungsrecht. Prüfe daher genau, ob der Weg wirklich nur eingeschränkt für jedermann zugänglich ist, bevor du das Merkmal verwendest. 
Im Forum[2] gab es auch mal einen Thread dazu, der die Einzelheiten beleuchtet hat.

Viele Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Werte
[2]: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70471
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:51+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:20:41+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:10:12+00:00): This road does not have a name. In the StatsCan dataset, it's marked as Bear Mountain Parkway, so that definitely isn't where you got the name.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:42:49+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:20:08+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:41:27+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:19:39+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
alester (2022-05-05 21:08:11+00:00): There is no such road in the StatsCan dataset. Google Maps does have a Squirrel Lane in this location, but that's the only place this road exists. There's no such road on-the-ground, nor in any reliable dataset.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 20:57:00+00:00): Please explain what data sources you have used on ALL your changesets.  Do not just link to a random page on the OSM wiki that says "here are some sources that mappers in general can use".
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:39:35+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:40:12+00:00): I am only linking as proof i am using an acceptable source
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 21:45:30+00:00): How did you convert the download there into what you used here?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:52:57+00:00): For ontario, i selected the ontario file, for Manitoba, i selected the manitoba file etc.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:53:59+00:00): when i click, i am given options of .gml and other options
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:55:05+00:00): it gives me choices
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:55:35+00:00): .gml, .tab, .shl etc.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:56:40+00:00): i also could download software if my computer doesn't work with the file types listed.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:57:32+00:00): I will obey any questions or complaints
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 22:05:01+00:00): So what did you actually download and what did you view it with?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:08:59+00:00): https://filext.com/file-extension/GML
https://filext.com/file-extension/TAB
https://www.gislounge.com/shapefile-viewers/
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:10:26+00:00): you will see that i used an online viewer for .gml and .tab files but for .shp i used LSI Viewer
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:46:45+00:00): different file types require different softwares, so it can vary, the answer is that i used all of these, as some are used as backups
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:57:12+00:00): I did proper research into what sources are accepted and which are not, so you should know better before deciding to meaninglessly revert my license compatible edits to defeat the purpose of "free and editable".
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 22:58:09+00:00): Please stop bullshitting and give a plausible answer.  Explain your workflow.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:59:19+00:00): what do you mean by explain your workflow, i do not understand? i am confused
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:01:11+00:00): I did proper research into what sources are accepted and which are not
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:02:01+00:00): i just want the OSM community to know i am listening and are willing to listen
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:02:24+00:00): i am only trying to improve OSM, and would never vandalize
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:04:08+00:00): i do not want to sound threatening, so please do not take offense to any messages or comments i make.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:07:31+00:00): i already gave you the answer, do you need me to explain further, you are really technical and expecting the whole picture, i am willing to reason and tell you the whole workflow.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:07:57+00:00): Please forgive me, i will listen
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:09:47+00:00): Click inside the file drop area to upload the GML files or drag & drop a GML files.
Input spatial reference system for a map.
Select the map format and sizes (small, medium, large).
Click on 'Generate' button to render map.
Your map will be rendered using the input spatial reference.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:10:42+00:00): Clicking the GML with right mouse button will bring a menu from which you should select the Open with option
Next, select the Choose another app option and then using More apps open the list of available applications
The last step is to select Look for another app on this PC option supply the directory path to the folder where FME Desktop is installed. Now all that is left is to confirm your choice by selecting Always use this app to open GML files and clicking
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:10:48+00:00): ok
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:13:04+00:00): Click on File (FILE), select Open, click on Computer and then the Browse button (FILE > Open > Computer > Browse). Make sure you have the All Files option selected from the filetype dropdown menu, then navigate to where your . tab file is stored, select it and then click on open.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:13:28+00:00): You need a suitable software like MapInfo to open a TAB file. Without proper software you will receive a Windows message "How do you want to open this file?" or "Windows cannot open this file" or a similar Mac/iPhone/Android alert. If you cannot open your TAB file correctly, try to right-click or long-press the file. Then click "Open with" and choose an application. You can also display a TAB file directly in the browser. Just drag the file onto this browser window and drop it.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:15:25+00:00): I used https://geoconverter.hsr.ch/ to convert to OSM.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:15:38+00:00): GeoConverter is a free online geospatial vector data converter (as a web application) that reads and writes several GIS file formats including an OSM XML reader. It's based on the well-known open source converter OGR/GDAL.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:16:54+00:00): Various GPS/waypoint files, including .gml (Geography Markup Language) and .osm (OpenStreetMap data) files, can be usually transformed or converted between one another using dedicated conversion solutions.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:17:33+00:00): OGR tools (such as ogr2ogr) support GML and (more recently) OSM XML as an in-built thing. Allowing you to covert between these formats. Many tools bundle OGR functionality too, so tools such Osmium and QGIS naturally support this conversion too.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:18:13+00:00): and that is how i converted it
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 23:18:13+00:00): Some text you copied from https://filext.com/file-extension/TAB is not a plausible answer.  We can only assume that you have done _none_ of the above.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:19:28+00:00): I used https://geoconverter.hsr.ch/ to convert to OSM.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:20:24+00:00): what is a plausible answer?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:20:51+00:00): could you please explain to me
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:21:53+00:00): what could you possibly want, is it that whatever i say is not a plausible answer?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:22:59+00:00): i am trying to answer your question, but your replies are leaving me with more answers
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:23:22+00:00): i meant, i am trying to answer your question, but your replies are leaving me with more questions
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:25:36+00:00): plausible answers?, now copied text, could you please tell me one thing i could do to solve your request, i can't win with those answers
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 23:35:15+00:00): I gave you a thorough walk through what I did to get these streets names out of RNF, and it is not plausible? I Can't win
SomeoneElse (2022-05-03 15:00:23+00:00): > I Can't win

Your answer included things that you'd need to do if using that source (which you copied and pasted from https://filext.com/file-extension/TAB but not things that you'd also need to do, such as working out where there were problems in OSM in the first place, and where OSM and your source differ finding out which was correct.
The problem is that because you've been "economical with the truth" elsewhere (https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/120074372 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/120101768 ) when you give half an answer here people are going to be skeptical.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 15:26:09+00:00): That makes sense