piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 16:56:13+00:00): So this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
is gaining rapid acceptance, and is in some stage of implementation for about half the states.  Granted, the mid-Atlantic is underrepresented in that effort, but with your help we can change that.  In that context, I wouldn't want you to go through wasted effort classifying roads given the major national conversation that is happening regarding highway classification (both on Slack and several threads that have happened on talk-us).  There is also a talk planned at the national conference in Tucson on this topic.  So it's kind of a big topic at the moment.
kapazao (2021-12-15 23:05:31+00:00): Buenas, ¿puedes explicar qué es este elemento concretamente (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9325844969)?
Está puesto como gasolinera y central de combustión.
adrianojbr (2021-12-10 13:39:46+00:00): Olá, Rachmaninoff! Bom retorno ao mapeamento.

Uma sugestão: é possível substituir a geometria de elementos antigos, em vez de excluí-los, habilitando o UtilsPlugin2 (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/UtilsPlugin2) e usando Ctrl+Shift+G.

Abraço.
rodrigocfd (2021-12-10 14:03:08+00:00): Olá Adriano,

Não conhecia este plugin, obrigado pela dica.

Existe alguma vantagem em substituir a geometria, ao invés de simplesmente criar um objeto novo?
adrianojbr (2021-12-10 16:15:10+00:00): As vantagens são manutenção  do histórico mesmo e [eventualmente] diminuir a sobrecarga do banco de dados, já que o objeto apagado, apesar de não ser mais renderizado, continua existindo [no banco de dados].

E como, ao criar um novo objeto, já se tem o trabalho de desenhar a nova geometria, apenas se substitui o trabalho de apertar o delete por Ctrl+Shift+G.

Mas não é algo que cause danos, de fato, que seja prejudicial... excluir o antigo e criar um novo.
santamariense (2021-12-10 16:21:49+00:00): Manter o histórico faz parte das boas práticas de mapeamento. Leia mais em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Manter_o_hist.C3.B3rico
ElliottPlack (2021-12-10 03:04:24+00:00): Boopington, despite my warning in a recent changeset, you chose to add yet another unrelated, meaningless comment here that is about the same as all of your recent comments. Please refrain from repeating changeset comments, they should be unique. Please review the wiki here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5515

- Elliott
OSM Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2022-05-20 07:03:11+00:00): Raising Discord question here as well. Scottie, it would  appear that the copyright restrictions on the various Cadet unit finder pages that you have listed as your source for these Unit locations, prevent us from using them, unless you arranged direct permission: https://www.defence.gov.au/copyright. Did you get the necessary permission? If so, it should be listed on the Data Catalogue.
Scottie0001 (2022-05-20 07:12:37+00:00): Refer to Discord discussion

https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/471231032645910529/977106070818402324
user_5359 (2021-12-14 09:37:15+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5360022060/history! The value 1 for the key admin_level means a political object larger than a state (admin_level=2). Please correct this value!
GOwin (2021-12-15 01:26:33+00:00): Thanks for catching this typo! 👍
kmpoppe (2021-12-11 09:20:20+00:00): Hello Map4See,

you have entered your eMail Address in the "mapillary"-field where it almost certainly doesn't belong.

Would you please remove the mail address? If you are not the receiver of mails for the Viola Clinic your personal address should NOT be on OpenStreetMap due to data privacy reasons.

Thank you! Kai
kmpoppe (2022-08-26 06:53:00+00:00): #Closed as the node in question has been deleted by another user.
CHANEL2NO (2021-12-12 14:48:16+00:00): مرکز تخصصی زیبایی ویولا
ivanbranco (2021-12-24 15:15:19+00:00): Hi BLUE,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010840836

tags are to be used in british english in osm, can you fix it?
user_5359 (2022-01-02 11:59:07+00:00): Hello!

What is the meaning of the tag 階段=yes?
nevw (2021-12-10 10:18:10+00:00): Hi Leo
I notice you have been splitting roads on council boundaries.
If you have to do this for an extensive road network for your project you might like to consider doing it using Qgis by using a layer containing the council boundary polygons to split the lines in a road layer. I’ll leave it to you to search the method if interested. If you only need to do a limited number of roads it may be better to proceed as you are currently. This is just a suggestion so feel free to proceed as you feel suits best your requirements.
Tengku Almira IRM-ED (2022-12-13 09:23:25+00:00): Hello amtpls

Thank you for doing the mapping however, I am a little confused with your mapping results because there are roads that cross the area of ​​water bodies. Is there a natural change in the image or what? because the mapping results are different from the current image results. If you like, please make improvements.

Greetings
Almira
amtpls (2022-12-13 14:03:35+00:00): Hi Almira,
If you check out the river tagging, it says "intermittent=yes". It means the flow of water is not permanent. If it is dry, people can pass through the river bed to the other side of the river or to harvest the material from the river (mostly rock, pebbles or sand from pyroclastic flow). The track that I drew can be explained from that activity. Unfortunately, nobody continue the track at the other tiles of map.

Cheers,
--amtpls
LuxuryCoop (2021-12-11 01:23:37+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
archpdx (2021-12-10 16:22:39+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Yes, letter box is the right feature for this. If you go to the 'Add field' section when selecting the letter box you can indicate whether or not it's lockable.
Little italy marrakech (2021-12-10 15:24:17+00:00): Ristorante italiano
ivanbranco (2022-01-03 18:34:49+00:00): Hi DAISYJANE,

place=7/11 convient store is not a valid place value, can you check it out?
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:24:30+00:00): Thank You.
zstadler (2021-12-30 15:05:35+00:00): שלום רן,

נקודות עניין ציבוריות לא מיועדות לצרכים פרטיים.

הדרך הנכונה לשתף נקודות ומסלולים עם חברים בשימוש ב
Israel Hiking Map
היא ליצור מסלול פרטי , לשמור אותו בענן ולשלוח את הקישור למי שתרצה.

את הנקודות שהוספת למפה הציבורית צריך למחוק.
zstadler (2022-01-17 16:10:29+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116261067
gpserror (2021-12-10 19:25:06+00:00): feel free to revert to assist in fixing changeset 112564056 and the other mess in this region
zstadler (2021-12-30 15:10:37+00:00): שלום דקל,

נקודות עניין ציבוריות לא מיועדות לצרכים פרטיים.

הדרך הנכונה לשתף נקודות ומסלולים עם חברים בשימוש ב
Israel Hiking Map
היא ליצור מסלול פרטי , לשמור אותו בענן ולשלוח את הקישור למי שתרצה.

את הנקודות שהוספת למפה הציבורית צריך למחוק.
zstadler (2022-01-17 18:08:50+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116261413
zstadler (2021-12-30 15:10:19+00:00): שלום רפי,

נקודות עניין ציבוריות לא מיועדות לצרכים פרטיים.

הדרך הנכונה לשתף נקודות ומסלולים עם חברים בשימוש ב
Israel Hiking Map
היא ליצור מסלול פרטי , לשמור אותו בענן ולשלוח את הקישור למי שתרצה.

את הנקודות שהוספת למפה הציבורית צריך למחוק.
zstadler (2022-01-17 18:07:05+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116265904
zstadler (2021-12-30 15:09:36+00:00): שלום אביחי,

נקודות עניין ציבוריות לא מיועדות לצרכים פרטיים.

הדרך הנכונה לשתף נקודות ומסלולים עם חברים בשימוש ב
Israel Hiking Map
היא ליצור מסלול פרטי , לשמור אותו בענן ולשלוח את הקישור למי שתרצה.

את הנקודות שהוספת למפה הציבורית צריך למחוק.
zstadler (2022-01-19 15:54:24+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116261413
zstadler (2021-12-30 15:06:12+00:00): שלום גילי עומרי,

נקודות עניין ציבוריות לא מיועדות לצרכים פרטיים.

הדרך הנכונה לשתף נקודות ומסלולים עם חברים בשימוש ב
Israel Hiking Map
היא ליצור מסלול פרטי , לשמור אותו בענן ולשלוח את הקישור למי שתרצה.

את הנקודות שהוספת למפה הציבורית צריך למחוק.
zstadler (2022-01-17 16:14:53+00:00): Fixed in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116261301
ff5722 (2022-01-29 12:41:51+00:00): 东莞不是教堂。。。
Bike 2 End (2021-12-18 13:52:40+00:00): You made changes to Olds Towne Arvada removing the pedestrian areas on the closed streets. Where did you get your information concerning the reopening of the streets. I live in Arvada and was unaware of any changes, though have not been there in several weeks.
shrayans (2021-12-20 11:00:08+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the information.
I have reverted the edit made in the changeset #115159987. it's an honest mistake from my end. I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going forward.

Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
shrayans
ToniE (2021-12-10 08:53:42+00:00): Danke, jetzt macht es Sinn.
anpk (2021-12-11 07:23:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зря вы ЖК "Домашний" исправили он не там находится. Там какая-то другая стройка. Вот тут есть схема: https://72.ru/text/realty/2021/12/06/70297580/ по ней можно понять что он ближе к ЖК "Плеханово" находится.
MarcoR (2021-12-12 14:52:06+00:00): Ciao! 
landuse=meadow è più per i prati per la produzione di fieno (landuse sottintende proprio uno sfruttamento del terreno da parte dell'uomo) che di solito si trovano fuori dai centri urbani; se si tratta di un semplice terreno incolto che nessuno usa potresti optare per natural=grassland (solo erba), natural=heath (per la maggior parte erba) o natural=scrub (arbusti); vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:landuse e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:natural per maggiori info

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114773173
user_5359 (2022-01-18 06:55:28+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/1010892871. This way has any tag.
Ogmios (2022-01-18 21:05:09+00:00): Thanks for noticing, I corrected it.
MarcoR (2021-12-12 14:58:50+00:00): Ciao!
Gli indirizzi civici in Italia sono associati all'ingresso che si affaccia sulla strada, quindi cerca di non aggiungerli direttamente agli edifici ma in un nodo che posizionerai nel punto in cui è presente la tipica "mattonella"; ricordati inoltre di "squadrare" gli edifici dopo averli disegnati: in genere infatti tutti gli edifici (almeno quelli moderni) hanno le pareti con angoli a 90°.

A presto,
Marco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114773446
wkdgs (2021-12-10 16:02:57+00:00): Auch hier sind noch die beiden proposed-Tags vorhanden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114773610
wkdgs (2021-12-10 16:02:34+00:00): Hi,

kannst du noch die beiden proposed-Tags entfernen?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114773653
ToniE (2021-12-10 09:53:54+00:00): Hi,

I don't think that a "Bauhof" is a religious building.

Please revert the two related edits or kindly tell me whether I should do it, 'cause you can't do it with OsmAnd.

Br
Toni
opendcc (2024-01-28 10:53:48+00:00): Ich habe mal alle sehr fragwürdigen Edits gefixed (hat der doch glatt in die LKW-Halle bei mir ums Eck Pfarrbüro reingebaut): Ist der ev. identisch zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hans-juergen%20koesters ?
SafetyIng (2021-12-25 00:11:17+00:00): Hey,
unter welcher Lizenz sind denn die Vermessungsdaten des Ingenieurbüros?
M3nsch (2021-12-25 17:05:57+00:00): Moin, 
Ich wurde von Herrn Zaehle beaufragt die hier einzustellen, ich weiß nicht unter welcher Lizenz das läuft.
M3nsch (2021-12-25 17:06:31+00:00): @SafetyIng
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 08:44:00+00:00): Ah cool, na gut, dann wird er die Daten erfasst haben ;) Coole Aktion, kannst du ja gerne weitergeben.

Hintergrund meiner Frage: Großes Problem ist halt allgemein, dass fremde Datenbanken nicht einfach so in OSM übernommen werden können/dürfen. Durch die Lizenz von OSM (OpenDatabase License ODbL) gibt es hier halt die notwendigkeit, dass z.B. keine direkte Namensnennung am Werk selbst stattfindet usw.
vasony (2021-12-17 10:09:11+00:00): Szia!

Mi a forrása az Esztergom, Árnyas köznek? Kb. egy éve lett felmérve, akkor ilyen itt még nem volt.

Tamás
vzolee (2021-12-17 10:22:32+00:00): Szia,

https://www.esztergom.hu/esztergomi/hirek/hir/273-eper-utca-forgalom-korlatozas

Z
vasony (2021-12-17 17:22:48+00:00): helyszínen ellenőrizve, ez a google maps kivágat téves. visszaállítottam a nevet.
Frans S (2021-12-10 15:12:51+00:00): Hello. See my other remarks.
Can you correct these mappings as well.
I did not check all your changesets. Please review them on the issues as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114775363
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-12-13 02:29:34+00:00): Hi Frans S,
Thanks for the review,
I've already fixed the warning issues in this changeset.
Thank you
tux67 (2021-12-10 15:43:17+00:00): Hi,
Telefonnummern sollten dem internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format folgen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
/wiki/DE:Key:phone#Anwendung
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114775481
Jrachi (2023-05-12 18:20:15+00:00): Ciao.
Hai messo descent=9552.80
A parte gli 80 cm piuttosto criticabili.
La zona è collinare con salitine niente male, ma novemila e cinquecento metri di dislivello mi sembrano esagerati!
eggie (2021-12-30 14:47:16+00:00): Hier is een bouwterrein en zijn geen wegen. Je hebt de oude situatie ingetekend.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-30 14:46:16+00:00): Beste Fr   Wat bedoel je met nieuwe wegen zijn open? Dit is het oude ziekenhuisterrein en nu bouwterrein.  Er is hier nog helemaal niets.. 
Alle wegen had ik juiste verijderd. behalve een tijdelijke verbinding tussen de Oosterweg en de Laan van Londen wegen rioleringswerkzaamheden. Ik haal je wegen weer weg.

Wat is je bron in deze?  Toch niet die PDOK luchtfoto uit 2019?
Zie ook nov 2021
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=30-12-2020&loc=51.78214%2C4.653794%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-10-09&acqid=20211009_110521_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1

MVG
eggie
sheldonelectric (2024-05-20 09:41:35+00:00): Bonjour! J'ai voulu aller a la toilette sauf qu'elle etait fermee, elle n'est donc pas 24/7 et j'ai efface ce tag. Peut etre les autres toilettes sont aussi a verifier?
Lejun (2024-05-20 19:42:00+00:00): Crotte alors, trois parkings sont officiellement indiqués comme étant en 24/7, ça en faisait partie ou ça venait d'une contrib' OSM ?
sheldonelectric (2024-06-07 10:00:19+00:00): Desole du retard, le parking est effectivement ouvert mais pas la toilette a l'interieur (il n'y avais pas d'horaire d'ouverture et je n'ai pas cherche plus, j'etais presse!)
Si tu les a importees il faudra verifier sur les lieux que c'est 24/7
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-10 10:51:48+00:00): Ciao. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio.  Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente.  Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2021-12-10 09:50:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Wanneer het de officieel 'gebruikte' naam is dan kun je name= Voormalige kapel van Sint-Elisabethshuis gebruiken.
Zoniet dan beter description= op de gebouwomtrek zetten

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DD1GJ (2021-12-10 11:36:12+00:00): Siehe Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114718189
rocky2109 (2021-12-10 11:26:18+00:00): Accidentally upload wrong source. The correct source for this change
Adding missing roads in Townsville QLD from aerial imagery and names from source=data.gov.au 
source: https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/08ee44af-cdc4-4e4c-8ddb-186026b2207d
Frans S (2021-12-11 11:41:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114777671
trigpoint (2021-12-13 13:42:13+00:00): This is a major step backwards in terms of osm mapping practice. Why are you removing tags from buildings and moving them to nodes?

In this case you have also thrown away surveyed building type information and replaced it with yes.
Tema_Ded (2021-12-20 08:14:46+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I'll take it into account.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114777850
jeslop (2021-12-10 11:43:18+00:00): Hola Tras el veganismo y bienvenido a OSM. Te he revertido el cambio que has hecho porque no se puede eliminar ese tipo de nodos de la forma en la que lo has hecho. 

Te recomiendo que antes de continuar editando te leas esta guía: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

También que te pongas en contacto con la comunidad de usuarios.

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
LuxuryCoop (2021-12-11 01:22:24+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
Dodko (2021-12-10 20:28:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197963549

Značka historic=ruins sa používa na ruiny ktoré majú historický význam https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:historic%3Druins

Pre bežnú rozpadajúcu budovu použi značku building=ruins
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Druins
Patr1k_P (2021-12-11 10:21:03+00:00): a mohol by si trosku lepsie popisat tvoje sady zmien a nie len "aa"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
Tresho (2021-12-10 14:24:23+00:00): Ciao, le scuole Marconi e Ferraris sono già mappate (Marconi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24896256, Ferraris: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855543493) inoltre agli edifici non va aggiunto i tag di indirizzo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114779560
rainerU (2022-02-11 13:55:38+00:00): Bonjour bibliofab66,

Avec ce changeset, tu as changé l'attribut highway de residential en steps pour la section de l'av. F.Mitterrand comprise entre la Place de la République et l'allée des droits de l'homme. Je suppose qu'il s'agit d'une erreur. Si c'est le cas, peux-tu la corriger, stp ?

Rainer
Steady Trot (2021-12-10 12:43:25+00:00): Cheers,
why you deleted the chicken houses https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475974501/history ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
bielebog (2022-04-13 09:46:03+00:00): Das Neubaugebiet Schöning war bisher nur extrem grob kartiert. Die Tage war ich mal dort und hab das nach Tracks verbessert. Der Hydrant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9327031005 liegt komplett in der Pampa. Vielleicht magst Du den und die anderen im Umfeld noch mal neu einmessen.
Frans S (2022-02-03 11:44:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A bit late, but please tag the highways you map. you just draw a line, without tagging it as a highway
Best regards
eggie (2021-12-11 08:50:21+00:00): Dag Wilco....  
a. De afslagbeperking klopt zowiezo niet, want je from loopt voorbij het punt (via) dat je (niet) wilt afslaan.
b.
Het is een onnodige afslagbeperking, want de oprit is immers een eenrichtingweg.
Je kunt zonder beperking ook niet afslaan. 
Kennelijk is de app zo ingesteld dat een hulpvoertuig tegen het verkeer in mag.. maar een andere mapper ziet in de 'validator' dat een afslagbeperking hier verkeerd is gebruikt. (onnodig) en zal 'm weer verwijderen. 
Tja.. hoe dat op te lossen zonder de regels van OSM te breken..  Even geen idee. 
Beter dus de afslagbeperking in deze vorm verwijderen. 
Vraag het eens op het forum of wellicht heeft Commodoortje nog ideeën. 
MVG
eggie
Wilco_VR_IJsselland (2021-12-13 11:39:51+00:00): Eggie..
Dank voor de feedback.
Ik heb dit probleem voorgelegd bij de applicatie beheerder.
Jij had inmiddels deze afslagbeperking al weer verwijderd?
eggie (2021-12-13 12:17:30+00:00): Hoi Wilco. Nee nog niet... maar nu wel  :)

Groet,
eggie
Commodoortje (2021-12-14 04:49:37+00:00): Ik kom hier binnenkort op terug.
Commodoortje (2021-12-16 04:43:30+00:00): A. Ik heb even gekeken, de bevinding van Wilco blijft een logisch gevolg. Als er een afslagbeperking op een weg gemaakt is, kan er standaard niet over gerouteerd worden.
Navigatie voor hulpvoertuigen kan wellicht ondervangen worden dmv emergency=yes op de routerelatie (van de afslagbeperking) toe te voegen.  

B. In dit voorbeeld blijkt dat de aaanwezigerouterelatie overbodig, dan wel niet effectief kan zijn  ivm een eenrichtingsweg, vandaar dat eggie deze relatie heeft verwijderd.
 
Tip: wil je weten hoe afslagbeperingen gemaakt kunnen worden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Turnrestrictions

Kijk dan ook op deze pagina naar de filmpjes, het is noodzakelijk dat je de turn restrictions plugin installeert
eggie (2021-12-16 07:21:10+00:00): In dit specifieke geval slaat de brandweerwagen komende uit het zuiden toch rechtsaf tegen het verkeer in. In OSM gebeurt dat niet met regulier verkeer. De brandweerapp negeert dus oneway=yes . .. maar het 'onjuist' om dat te voorkomen door een afslagbeperking.. Wanneer er een bord staat..Alleen rechtdoor.. kan het wel.
Staat er een dergelijk bord?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-16 07:44:47+00:00): Er staat geen bord.. Dus dan geen afslagbeperking invoeren. 
https://www.google.nl/maps/@52.2514634,6.2156593,3a,90y,40.19h,56.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skQuc-DxemtAmOrpOX2nxLA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Het probleem is eerder dat een brandweerwagen die draai tegen het verkeer niet kan maken hier, maar de app suggereert dat wel. 
Tja.. hoe voorkom je dat binnen de conventie van OSM?
Commodoortje (2021-12-16 08:20:30+00:00): Dit is niet aan OSM.
Daar kan Live-Nav verder mee, als Wilco deze changeset als voorbeeld geeft
archpdx (2021-12-10 16:39:53+00:00): Hi, why did you remove the wikidata tags from a bunch of businesses, schools, and parks from this area? It also looks like you changed the NW Self Storage to a building
Frans S (2021-12-13 10:30:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114781986