piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-02-22 15:37:02+00:00): Oke Cees.. Ik zag het.. Ik heb nu knooppunt 87 even gesorteerd. Dat lag aan de verkeerde kant in de relatievolgorde. Met editor iD kun je niet iets met routes bewerken. Die editor zet alles wat je aanraakt aan het begin  van de relatie.
Het is nu oke.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-02-22 19:45:43+00:00): Kijk even hier ter Leering ende Vermaeck
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117698765#map=15/51.5554/3.8205

Er was nog meer mis. 

Editor iD zet dus ook die relatiedelen die je hebt bewerkt helemaal achteraan.  Extra lastig hier het feit dat er twee knooppunten 24 zijn om de routering goed af te handelen.

Het is nu goed.
gr eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-05 19:23:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your way.
user_5359 (2022-03-05 19:25:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag.
Also the the difference between name and description. A house is a building and doesn't have the name House.
user_5359 (2022-02-22 18:56:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Did you forget to add the tag building=yes?
IIVQ (2022-08-10 07:25:51+00:00): Why did you add an antiques shop to this building? It already has the Antique shops tag inside the same building!
Carto'Cité (2022-08-11 11:57:34+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
J'ai réintroduit le trottoir cyclable décrit par Simon ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032839135
Il permet de mieux décrire la situation qu'un simple cycleway:right=track car, il ne sagit pas à proprement parler d'une piste cyclable mais bien d'un trottoir cyclable. N’hésite pas à discuter avec Simon de Geovelo ou moi de ces sujets si nécessaire :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
eggie (2022-02-21 18:52:40+00:00): Beste Timon..

Je voegt nuttige zaken toe, maar er zitten ook veel fouten in. Ben je wellicht nieuwsgierig wat je kunt verbeteren? 
Vraag om een review request.. en ga daar dan iets mee doen. 
Wat heb je gedaan met de vorige feedback?
Je edits zijn in een te groot gebied en nauwelijks te controleren.
Je edits...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117694941
Je commentaar.. 
Parkeerplaatsen, tags geupdate en meer 

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-02-22 18:56:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you forget to add the tag building=yes?
canfe (2022-02-22 08:58:26+00:00): Come avevo scritto in due dei precedenti changeset, del 2021-12-07 e 2021-10-25 sarebbe meglio specificare cosa si è mappato o modificato piuttosto  che mettere un generico "sopralluogo".
La mappatura è sicuramente corretta ma non facilita chi verifica le modifiche.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117695211
tolioalessandro (2023-06-30 21:02:59+00:00): Ciao Gianfranco,
con questa tua modifica hai eliminato da alcuni tronchi di strada del Bassanese le relazioni riguardanti le linee autobus urbane di Bassano del Grappa, linee autobus extraurbane e relazioni di strade provinciali. 

Ho appena provveduto io a ripristinarle tramite le seguenti modifiche:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137973625

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137973733

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137973778

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137973840

Ti chiedo di prestare maggiore attenzione nelle tue prossime modifiche quando cancelli relazioni da tronchi di strade affinchè i miglioramenti alle mappe che apporti tu non vadano a inficiare il lavoro di chi è passato prima di te.

Ti ringrazio per il tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap, con le tue oltre 2100 modifiche apportate.

Buon proseguimento,

Alessandro
Gianfranco2014 (2023-07-01 10:50:50+00:00): Ti chiedo scusa dell'inconveniente, cercherò di fare più attenzione.
tolioalessandro (2023-07-01 12:21:46+00:00): Non c'è problema, è chiaro che è stato fatto in buona fede. Te l'ho fatto notare solo perchè capita anche a me di non accorgermi di errori che commetto e quando qualcuno me li fa notare mi aiuta a migliorarmi.

Grazie e a presto,

Alessandro
wireguy (2022-02-23 13:36:18+00:00): jdasmh,  your mapping has several errors. houses should not have an office tag.   you deleted part of the residential landuse relation and it is causing validation errors.  please adjust and read how to map golf courses on the wiki at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452618.
ZLima12 (2022-03-26 03:01:50+00:00): Hi,

Please check multiple imagery sources available to you when mapping. The one you were using probably wasn't very useful here, so you had to put in a rough shape. Other imagery sources here are much better, so you could have mapped the building more accurately to what's on the ground. Either way though, thanks for contributing!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117696154
mavl (2022-02-24 02:43:31+00:00): Hello. This changeset adds the unreal big building. This building was deleted. Please, mark on the map the real objects.  
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
zyphlar (2022-02-21 20:03:07+00:00): Please keep your changesets confined to a reasonable geographical area. When you edit a medical office in Vancouver and a bar in the Bahamas, it looks like you edited the entire continental United States, thousands of people get notified of your change, and our tools start to choke when anyone tries to review what you did.
Gonéo (2022-04-08 09:08:45+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout. La piste a été construite à la place d'une voie motorisée. Il faudrait aussi mettre à jour le nombre de voies et le "turn:lanes" si tu es dans le secteur pour vérifier.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:31:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452553.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452532.
eggie (2022-02-21 19:56:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Het gebouw heb ik even hersteld.
Wanneer je op de luchtfotp een puntdak ziet heeft het gebouw in werkelijkheid geen puntvorm.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-21 19:43:02+00:00): Dag Spieke.. Het is wel meer gebruikelijk om het zo te doen.
Het voorkomt een vreemde 'gevaarlijke' routering. 
Iemand die verkeerd rijdt en vergat links af te slaan krijgt de verkeerde opdracht.
Je mag dus niet over het verdrijvingsvlak.... maar het kan wel. Denk bv aan hulpdiensten die dat wel moeten doen.
De splitsing staat nu op de verkeerde plaats.
Dus nooit  meerder wegen waar je gewoon kunt oversteken over de verfstrepen.
Je edits..   https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117697631

Formeel staat het puntstuk dus nu verkeerd in OSM.
gr eggie
Noud Speijcken (2022-02-21 20:09:55+00:00): Ok, bedankt voor de feedback. Ik had het punt verplaatst vanwege de het verdrijvingsvlak inderdaad. Is er dan nut/mogelijkheid om het verdrijving-vlak te mappen?

Kan ik de changeset nu aanpassen of ongedaan maken of moet ik dan een nieuwe changeset maken om het punt weer terug te zetten? (Het werkt nog niet helemaal als pull-request zo te zien)
eggie (2022-02-21 20:21:29+00:00): Een verdrijvingsvlak mappen.. geen idee. Het feit dat je er niet mag keren is al een indicatie voor een doorgetrokken streep.
Vaak is het ook een beetje cosmetisch hoe je de wegen uitlijnt. Wanneer je gelijk de wegen laat uitkomen bij de brug is het ook geen gezicht. Dan krig je echt een knik. Beetje schipperen dus. 
De consensus is in ieder geval geen aparte rijbanen als je over de strepen kunt rijden. De vorige mapper A67 A67 had een beetje de 'middenweg ' gekozen. 
Wanneer je de punt weer teruglegt krijg je vanzelf een nieuwe changeset.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452513.
trigpoint (2022-02-21 21:45:24+00:00): Just wondering why you have removed the wikidata tag from Northwood?
Mapd123 (2022-02-22 08:16:05+00:00): My mistake, oops.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452501.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452480.
literan (2022-02-21 19:53:48+00:00): Добрый день.
А можно попросить вас постараться не делать такие большие по площади чейнджсеты? спасибо

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
misha yakin (2023-01-15 18:49:28+00:00): Добрый день!
Да, извиняюсь, похоже что-то лишнее подцепилось, не углядел. :(
Или это от того, что поправил отношение "маршрут E22" -- а оно действительно огромное.
eggie (2022-02-22 16:02:49+00:00): Hoi Dick,

Ik had nog wat aan een wandelroute hersteld. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117694067#map=14/51.5420/3.8161&layers=C

Maar nu zag ik ook dat er in fietsroute 24-34 een soort tentakel zat met twee knooppunten 24.
Daar zaten drie wegdelen Kaaidijk aan het eind van die route in het oosten. Die heb ik weer gesorteerd naar het meest westelijk knooppunt 24.
Eigenlijk even geen idee of het nu goed is omdat jij hier ook al iets hersteld had.
Kun jij nog even kijken of ik 24 34 goed heb afgehandeld?


Groet
eggie
dvdhoven (2022-02-22 18:51:38+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Ik heb nu een route 24-24 gemaakt en de routes nu laten eindigen bij één van de 2 kp'en 24. Dan wordt het een stukje duidelijker en beter te hanteren.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2022-02-22 19:15:56+00:00): Oke... top!
gr eggie
PT-53 (2022-02-27 07:59:38+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz dieses Multipolygon (MP)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13836106/history
neu angelegt. Es besteht aus diesen beiden Flächen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477885587/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490510328/history
die 3 gemeinsame Knoten haben. Das sollte bei einem MP nicht sein, weshalb im OSM-Inspector auch ein entspr. Fehlerhinweis "touching_rings" angezeigt wird:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.01274&lat=48.03996&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ring_not_closed,touching_rings,role_should_be_inner,role_should_be_outer,inner_with_same_tags,ways

War das MP ein Versehen und wolltest Du die beiden Flächen verschmelzen?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-03-13 12:07:27+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95, 
es wäre schön, wen Du noch reagieren würdest.
PT-53 (2022-03-18 06:34:59+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich die beiden Flächen vereinigt. Dann sollte jetzt aber auch noch das MP (mit nur nich einem Mitglied) gelöscht werden und die vereinigte Fläche mit dem Merkmal
landuse=industrial
versehen werden.
Machst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße
Alex-r95 (2022-03-19 12:28:22+00:00): Hi PT-53, habe es soeben geändert.
PT-53 (2022-03-19 12:36:30+00:00): Super
porfiriopaiz (2022-03-27 22:46:22+00:00): Why are you renaming existing streets that already had a name and why are you using INETER and Alcaldía de Managua as sources?

These are not valid sources as the lack of an explicit license for its use with OSM compatible with the ODbL.

Also, here in Nicaragua we don't use the term "Callejuela".

Please refrain from modifying or adding data to Nicaragua's OSM data.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452344.
Nakaner (2023-03-08 12:55:13+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset, you added the German name "Linie der Kontrolle" to "Line of Control" between the territories controlled by India and Pakistan. Which sources did you use to ensure that the German name is in use? Do you speak German?

Best regards

Michael
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452180.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 03:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123452316.
GinaroZ (2022-02-21 22:13:35+00:00): The name appears on both OS streetview and openmap in the editor, as well as on the NLS maps website. Not sure exactly what feature it applies to but it's clearly from an open map.
andrum99 (2022-02-22 04:59:47+00:00): A knowe is a small hill. The open OS data has it in a slightly different place, outwith this field. The current OS Explorer map has it in this field.
GinaroZ (2022-02-22 21:54:24+00:00): Old OS maps have it in the field as well: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=16&lat=56.11393&lon=-3.30453&layers=193&right=osm so I've readded it as a locality
andrum99 (2022-02-22 22:10:13+00:00): A quick google of "Colvin's Knowe" reveals that this marking on the OS maps is like to be the site of an old chapel and cists which no longer exist, or are no longer visible on the groud - see https://scotlandsplaces.gov.uk/record/hes/51094/colvins-knowe/rcahms. This ties in with the old OS map you found which also says 'Stone Cists found' - a cist being an ancient coffin or burial chamber.

Your choice of 'locality' as a tag therefore seems reasonable. 👍
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 11:06:58+00:00): Merci.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117699844
Bierphysik (2023-11-06 18:19:40+00:00): Hi, du hast u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122442355/history#map=19/50.37077/8.69086 als in construction getaggt. Bist Du Dir da sicher? Aus Hesse DOP ist der way schon vorhanden...
Bierphysik (2023-11-06 18:21:43+00:00): Ich glaube da hast Du Dich vertan. ich passe das mal an, nach HEsse DOP, schau Du mal bitte drauf.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 02:46:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451967.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-22 08:33:47+00:00): Ciao. Se la situazione è ancora quella su mapillary, non mi sembra corretto. barrier=block: "Any *large*, solid, immobile block that can be moved only with heavy machinery or great effort. *Typically big solid things made of concrete* for stopping larger vehicles. Sometimes natural boulders are used for the same purpose.". https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=862905884305831 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117700088
ivanbranco (2022-02-22 16:42:39+00:00): Sistemato
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-22 16:52:45+00:00): Grazie
praeteritum (2022-07-11 02:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451723.
gscscnd (2022-02-22 08:58:00+00:00): FWIW, reverter_plugin was not used in this changeset.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 02:09:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451636.
chuckfinley71 (2022-02-21 22:02:39+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! For the sport fields like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033971680 they should not have a generic name value, the 'name' field is for areas that have a specific names. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
praeteritum (2022-07-11 02:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451584.
PT-53 (2022-03-07 08:47:17+00:00): Hallo skyper,
ich bin durch einen Hinweis in broutersuspects
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=19/7.83208/47.99351&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/tertiarynew.json
auf diese Sperrung gestoßen.
Wie lange wird die Sperrung voraussichtlich dauern?
Könntest Du eine entspr. Note an den gesperrten Abschnitten anbringen?
Fragende Grüße
skyper (2022-03-08 13:49:40+00:00): Hey PT-53
Die Ochsenbrücke wird komplett saniert.
Zur Dauer gibt es unterschiedliche Aussagen von einem halben bis zu einem ganzen Jahr und sicherlich wird sich die Situation auch ändern, da zur Zeit die östliche Seite und später die westliche Seite gesperrt ist/sein wird. Ich bekomme eigentlich die Veränderungen Zeitnah mit
Was für eine Note hast Du Dir vorgestellt? Mit einer schwammigen Angabe meiner Informationen ist uns wohl auch nicht wirklich geholfen.
Grüße skyper
PT-53 (2022-03-08 14:39:46+00:00): Hallo skyper,
ich nehme an Du kennst broutersuspects:
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59957
Ich schaue mir jeweils Sonntags in der Karte
- http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=19/7.83308/47.99364&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
die gemeldeten Hinweise an. Sofern die Baustellen-Daten in OSM korrekt sind "verstecke" ich die Hinweise für eine gewisse Zeit. Dazu brauche ich aber Informationen, wie lange die Baustellensperrung voraussichtlich andauern wird. Eine Note, bis wann die Sperrung nach aktueller Meldung dauern wird, wäre da schon hilfreich, auch wenn später eine "Verlängerung" erforderlich sein sollte.

Wenn ich weiß, daß die Baustelle zeitnah und zuverlässig überwacht wird, kann ich aber auch gleich einen entsprechend längeren Zeitraum eintragen. Was schlägst Du vor?

Grüße
skyper (2022-03-08 15:11:27+00:00): Dann trag ein dreiviertel Jahr ein. Bis dahin sollte sich wohl die Baustelle zumindest verlagert haben.
Das hier nur Straßen und keine Wege angemahnt werden ist ja auch nicht nett.
Ohne vor Ort Überprüfung, werden die Details eh nicht anzupassen sein, aber ich kann bei den nächsten Änderungen gerne noch eine Zeitangabe mit angeben.

Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2022-02-21 23:16:43+00:00): revert wg. unulässiger Verwendung des BayernAtlas, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117649704
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-10 08:29:40+00:00): This change optimizes for routers at the expense of other kinds of data consumers. Changeset 118310149 introduces name:left/right and restores name but keeps name:forward/backward for routers.
DD1GJ (2022-02-21 23:16:29+00:00): revert wg. unulässiger Verwendung des BayernAtlas, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117649704
Frans S (2022-11-27 09:39:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, as requested. . Sorry for the late response.
Please read the info on attached document how to improve your mapping skills, in case you want to start mapping again.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.

Please read this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117700923
praeteritum (2022-07-11 02:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451543.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 00:04:40+00:00): What source did you use for the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823065235/history ?
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-02 00:09:24+00:00): Each parking area should be grouped per lot, not by bunch or group of parking spaces. You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking#:~:text=Each%20parking%20area%20feature%20should%20be%20mapped%20as%20a%20contiguous%20area

In addition to the one lot for the parking area, you can map each individual space using the following tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

And don't worry, I made the same mistake when I first started. I've gone ahead and merged some of the areas in this region.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:58:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451483.
h551w (2022-02-22 05:06:34+00:00): Oooh, new Bing!
Allison P (2022-02-22 05:10:05+00:00): They come out like falling dominoes.
Allison P (2022-03-04 06:55:06+00:00): I was a ways off. The date's been added now. April 18–21 is the range given by the editor.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451380.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-07 15:10:26+00:00): Hello,
What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985025915 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
SHARCRASH (2022-02-21 21:30:37+00:00): + new elements
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451343.
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-22 23:33:29+00:00): revertida por vandalismo
GinaroZ (2022-02-21 22:11:02+00:00): Don't know if you are aware, but there are quite a few notes here in case you have a chance to survey them :)  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.98134/-3.17841&layers=N
lottie1040 (2022-02-21 22:34:57+00:00): I see, ta!
bxl-forever (2022-02-21 22:29:59+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OSM!

Nice try but… no, please do not move buildings on the map.  Especially not with aerial imagery—sometimes incorrectly called "satellite imagery"—because it only shows a distorted view of the territory.  We have proper building outlines obtained through Brussels UrbIS data.

Have a nice day.
Jakka (2022-02-22 08:27:25+00:00): the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2082583476 still present ?
M3tacat (2022-02-22 15:09:43+00:00): Indeed... it is not. I'm deleting it :)
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-21 01:07:17+00:00): marcou o terreno todo do mercadona como edificio
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:44:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451335.
PT-53 (2022-02-22 07:55:56+00:00): Hallo Christian,
hälst Du es für wirklich angebracht private Swinningpools in OSM einzuzeichnen?
Ich jedenfalls nicht! Das ist für mich eine Verletzung der Privatsphäre.
Grüße
CPO187 (2022-02-22 08:48:59+00:00): Jemand hat meinen Pool auch eingetragen und ich wollte nur helfen. Wenn das nicht erwünscht ist, dann sollte man meinen vielleicht auch entfernen?
CPO187 (2022-02-22 08:53:56+00:00): BTW: Der Pool ist von der Straße sehr gut sichtbar
PT-53 (2022-02-22 09:03:34+00:00): Hallo Christian, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Auch wenn der Pool von außen gut sichtbar ist, würde ich keinen privaten Pool einzeichnen.
Grüße
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:42:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451296.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123451020.
daganzdaanda (2022-02-26 18:57:57+00:00): Hello Nourhane,
I deleted the "Regard 4" point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9525605477 because it showed up at "Null Island". It was probably a software glitch. You should try to add this suction point again at the right location.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 01:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450863.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-11 16:59:40+00:00): Gostaria de entender porque eliminou parte da avenida jorge peixinho deixando um rasgo neste arruamento, aparenta nao responder à realidade e por isso peço que verifique e reponha a situação. mais cuidado da proxima pois a sua edição aparenta ser gravosa.
paulo106 (2022-10-12 09:29:33+00:00): Bom dia,
sinceramente, não percebi como aconteceu. Quando editei, se me lembro bem, só estava a colocar a passadeira. Já corrigi.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-12 14:04:40+00:00): obrigado pelas respostas, convido a entrar no grupo do discord da comunidade portuguesa em https://t.me/OSMPortugal. boas edições ;)
praeteritum (2022-07-11 00:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450845.
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 11:03:14+00:00): Hi, danke für deine Korrektur,

Wenn sie amtlich anerkannt und benannt sind, sollte eigentlich "residential" verwendet werden, "service" ist immer ein bisschen inoffiziell.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117703286