piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nord0296 (2019-12-16 00:18:49+00:00): This driveway does not exist out to Galpin anymore.  If satellite appears to show it - it is old.  The home it formerly connected to Galpin now has a driveway to the unnamed dead end off of Fawn Hill Road.
siddhaam (2019-12-16 05:22:59+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. As there is no latest imagery available on the OSM, I added a driveway. Thank you for keeping posted about the area. We are always happy to engage with the OSM Community and learn from them.

Regards,
siddhaam.
skquinn (2019-12-09 02:31:40+00:00): Oops, meant to also add "add type and number of levels to buildings"
viloan (2019-12-09 03:16:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-12-14 13:02:42+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag '_quantite' to two objects. Was this a mistake?
http://osm.org/way/753801041
http://osm.org/way/753801080
Olyon (2019-12-14 16:59:12+00:00): Hi,
Sorry, it's a mistake. I deleted the tag.
Thank you.
viloan (2019-12-09 04:37:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-12-09 05:42:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/7704533, https://www.osm.org/relation/7704534
malcolmh (2019-12-12 07:52:24+00:00): What are the nodes "Sea Rescue"? I don't see any object on the satellite imagery.
VictorIE (2019-12-12 10:37:45+00:00): I don't know. I can only assume it is some form of marker used by the local lifeguards / lifeboats. they were mapped by someone else, I just tagged them with *=yes instead of something more specific.
Warin61 (2019-12-10 06:38:34+00:00): Reverted as it broke the Hobart adim boundary (which I'll admit is an extremely badly mapped boundary!) I have tried to fix some errors here (one way going the wrong way!, overlapping ways ..)
user_5359 (2019-12-09 16:57:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:40:42+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:40:58+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
user_5359 (2019-12-09 16:56:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:41:19+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
Marc_ch (2024-10-10 18:43:57+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215888390/history
le wikidata n'est pas sur le bon objet, il faut créer un objet station de sport d'hiver landuse=winter_sports car le restaurant et le bâtiment ne sont qu'une partie de la station.
Salutations,
Marc
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:41:38+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:42:22+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway";"Way terminates on Area" issues ;improved geometry
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:43:08+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway";"Way terminates on Area" issues ;improved geometry
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:43:48+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
aharvey (2019-12-10 00:59:51+00:00): There's two other relations which reference this as well https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10214162 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9736832.

I wonder what we should use for the network tag?
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-10 14:02:08+00:00): Ah I see there is a relation also for each direction of services as well that I missed, thanks.

As for network, I think "Sydney Light Rail" because it's in line with the rest of the transport network (Sydney Buses, Sydney Trains, etc), it has a website called "Sydney light rail" (includes the L1 as well), and its own(ish) wikidata identifier (Q771666)
abakus_uploader (2019-12-09 23:32:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
romanwueest (2019-12-09 21:49:14+00:00): Das Gefälle ist eher 4.5%. Diese Zahl wurde auf der Webseite des Tunnels mehrfach erwähnt. Auch sieht es für mich so aus, als ist das Portal Bahntal eher höher als 400müM. Und das Portal Engi ist etwas tiefer als der nördliche Kreisel mit 460m.
Andy Stricker (2019-12-21 01:34:30+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe nochmals die verfügbaren Quellen geprüft und es ist tatsächlich so, dass unter https://www.galgenbucktunnel.ch/Projektuebersicht ein Gefälle von 4.5% erwähnt wird, welches vermutlich die SHN vom 2019-11-20 übernommen hat und worauf sich Wikipedia beruft. In der Grafik
https://www.galgenbucktunnel.ch/Projektuebersicht/Tunnelbau unten hingegen sieht man die Höhenangaben 390 müM und 460 müM der beiden Portale. Wenn man damit und der Länge von 1138 m rechnet, kommt man allerdings auf eine grössere Steigung. Trotzdem habe ich mich nun auf die Angaben vom BfS ASTRA basiert und wieder 4.5% eingetragen.
PT-53 (2019-12-09 12:42:10+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Du gibst als Quelle für Deine Änderungen "knowledge" an. Hast Du so ein gutes Gedächtnis um Wassergräben korrekt eintragen zu können?
Verläuft dieses Rohr
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753859456/history
wirklich so schräg. In Maps4BW und auch auf den Luftbildern sieht das ganz anderst aus.
Schaust Du Dir das ganze nochmal mit Maps4BW an?
Fragende Grüße
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:39:30+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highlway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:38:43+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:49:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de ne pas dégrader la base OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
Vous aviez supprimé votre maison et mis un parc à la place. Si votre maison a un nom sur la facade, ok pour le nom, sinon ca n'a rien à faire dans OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78138815
amtplskaart (2024-11-05 05:41:53+00:00): Please confirm this access tag "motorcar=no" in this way 575122379. From the satellite view (ESRI World Imagery), it is very clear that there are some motorcar in this road.
Warin61 (2019-12-11 06:56:46+00:00): Still a duplicate node on this way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.66710&lat=-36.94723&zoom=15
Константин Гам (2020-01-27 16:02:33+00:00): Пожалуйста пишите комментарии к правкам!
gendy54 (2019-12-09 20:04:32+00:00): Bonjour,
L'essentiel est bine cartographié, mais:
- ne pas supprimer le tag source
- la valeur pour le tag cuisine n'est pas bon. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cuisine
-N° de phone à mettre en format international https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone
- Heures d'ouverture. Je doute que la crêperie soit ouverte 24/24. C'est ce qui est marqué.
- les tags city et postcode sont inutiles en France
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78139613
gendy54 (2019-12-09 20:06:10+00:00): Tu as mal regardé, la pharmacie était déjà cartographiée dans la base. Je supprime donc.
Sinon attention à la typographie sur le nom
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78140007
eggie (2019-12-09 10:08:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
gendy54 (2019-12-09 20:21:37+00:00): Merci des ajouts.
J'ai simplement supprimé le nom pharmacie car il existe déjà une pharmacie et le nom pharmacie était sur le nom du kiosque, ce qui n'est pas logique.
Sinon les tag city et postcode sont inutiles en France
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78140139
viloan (2019-12-09 09:20:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ACarlotti (2019-12-10 05:04:42+00:00): You marked the roundabouts as open again, whereas many comments on Facebook say that they are still closed. Since you didn't mention that change in your comment, and didn't include a source, I've reverted that in 78184278. This is the second time I've reverted that change since Sunday night (and the third time in total). Please check the changeset history around the A14 works before future edits - there are many people contributing, and it's unhelpful if they keep making the same errors. Also, make sure your changeset description describes *all* of the changes, and if you split it into separate changesets if you're doing multiple separate things remotely, then it makes it easier to revert errors.
c2r (2019-12-10 07:03:51+00:00): They looked open to me when I drove round the site to survey what was open and what was not; however, perhaps the cones were removed and put back, or perhaps I misremembered, who knows.  I've also been reverting enthusiastic pre-opening of sections over the last weeks, so appreciate that it's really annoying.  Anyway, with regard to these, certainly if there's more recent closure details on facebook then by all means go with that.
abrensch (2019-12-30 18:03:26+00:00): Hallo Papa Schlumpf,

geplant war diese Sperre der A24 Auf/Abfahrt Fehrbellin bis 20. Dezember

besteht sie noch?
abrensch (2020-01-07 09:21:35+00:00): nochmal hallo,

ich habe den Änderungssatz zurueckgesetzt

Gruss, Arndt
eggie (2019-12-09 10:10:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Beter geen adresnodes veranderen. Deze zijn geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. 29A zal ook aanwezig zijn op het gebouw.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-09 10:14:56+00:00): Beste mapper,

Wanneer iets niet klopt met de nummering zou je een terugmelding kunnen doen bij het Kadaster via deze site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=najaarsweg%2029&resultOffset=0&objectId=0153200000474976&geometry.x=262301.019&geometry.y=471736.036&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0153010000474977
Doe je dit zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-09 10:29:25+00:00): De adresnode heb ik losgemaakt van de omliggende landuse=grass
Gr Eggie
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:58:46+00:00): C'est toujours à l'ADPC? Si non, supprime les tags concernés
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78141309
Yves FRANCOIS (2019-12-19 11:05:09+00:00): La destination a changé, mais concrètement le bâtiment est toujours loué par l'ADPC 67.
rskedgell (2019-12-09 20:06:41+00:00): While your changeset comment claims that you have changed the edging of Parsons Green, what you have actually done is changed the N-S route through the green from highway=cycleway to highway=footway.  As this forms part of LCN 26 and the crossing at the southern end is a tiger crossing, I am not convinced.

Status quo ante restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78169399
tux67 (2019-12-09 12:14:23+00:00): Hi,
a parking aisle should be located on a parking area (this one is missing in both cases, as well as the access permission that his valid here)
BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78141745
bmuskaan (2019-12-09 12:32:44+00:00): Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Changed the highway tag of the parking aisle into service road. Please refer the changeset(78149613) for the recent edit made. Please let me know if any other changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
bmuskaan.
gendy54 (2019-12-10 21:03:19+00:00): il y a un tag plus approprié que college mais impossible de le retrouver.
Par contre, tu as supprimé le tag building=yes. Tu as donc littéralement supprimé le bâtiment.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques

A ta disposition si tu désires utiliser OSM dans le cadre de la PC. 
gendy54, le même que sur Autotitre ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78141866
Yves FRANCOIS (2019-12-19 11:03:53+00:00): Hello. Merci de ton analyse, s'il y a une catégorie plus adaptée, je suis preneur. Le bâtiment semble toujours apparaître, je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir touché à autre chose que la destination du bâtiment. Etrange.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78141866
gendy54 (2019-12-19 11:12:00+00:00): Je viens de remettre le tag buiding=yes. Quand j'aurai retrouvé le tag approprié, je te le dirai ;)

Donat alias gendy54
gendy54 (2019-12-31 00:06:21+00:00): Ca y est, j'ai fini par retrouvé. Tu peux utiliser office=educational_institution
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:office=educational%20institution?uselang=fr) qui sera plus approprié.
Goatosm (2019-12-13 22:38:58+00:00): Hello ЧикиБамБони . I noticed that here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78141960 you have been adding new highways that are not supported by the sources you cited and do not exist in any aerial imageries. Is there a reason you are making these edits? OSM has best practices editors should follow here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice. Thank you
rskedgell (2019-12-09 19:15:14+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I notice that you have changed all of St. Marks Close from highway=residential to highway=footway, but both the Bing aerial imagery which you have used and Maxar Premium appear to show parked cars in front of the houses, so access for pedestrians only seems unlikely.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:37:54+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
user_5359 (2019-12-26 16:30:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
TIP_ARTERA
ref:bucharest
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Rus Ionut (2019-12-27 07:38:02+00:00): Hi, 
It was a mistake from my end, I will remove those tags. The source of the information is data provided by the Municipality of Bucharest
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-12-09 11:35:00+00:00): UKR: Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway" issue;improved geometry
rskedgell (2019-12-09 19:40:55+00:00): I very much doubt that this residential street is accessible only to pedestrians. There are a few clues: (1) the parked cars visible on aerial imagery, (2) the fact it is part of a cycle route relation and (3) it is not a new car-free residential development.
As your change could break cycle routing, I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78168378
johnmcr (2019-12-09 10:37:44+00:00): This road would be better discribed as a service road, it's the drive way to large house. Private access only. Bing imagery is way out of date.
madnikhi (2019-12-10 06:27:21+00:00): Hi johnmcr,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Made the changes as per the suggestion given. Please refer the changeset (78187729) for the modifications done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from local community.

Regards,
madnikhi.
gendy54 (2019-12-10 21:05:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Si c'est une boulangerie, il manque le tag shop=bakery
POur le reste:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78143101
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
gendy54 (2019-12-10 21:07:45+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai fais qlq corrections
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78143660
PT-53 (2019-12-09 15:34:29+00:00): Hallo Markus,
ein Tipp: Die Maxar Premium Luftbilder sind viel aktueller. Dort sind die neuen Straßen schon zu sehen. Du kannst die Luftbilder im Menü Hintergrundbildeinstellungen am rechten Bildschirmand auswählen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-09 15:35:46+00:00): PS: Schau Dir auch mal die amtliche Karte Maps4BW an (ebenfalls im Hintergrundbildeinstellungen).
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
PT-53 (2019-12-10 09:12:22+00:00): Hallo Markus,
da waren 2 Straßenabschnitte, die direkt übereienander liefen (hin und zurück). Das sollte nicht sein und führt zu Fehler bei Navis. Ich habe das bereinigt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-10 09:20:24+00:00): Da war nochmal ein doppelter Straßenabschnitt. Bereinigt
gendy54 (2019-12-10 21:14:29+00:00): J'ai fait la modif de l'adresse
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78144421
aharvey (2019-12-10 00:14:04+00:00): could you fix your source:name tag please? This is in NSW not VIC.
PulisakZ (2019-12-10 07:26:04+00:00): My bad :(  I fixed. 
Thank you @aharvey!
viloan (2019-12-09 10:36:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-06-16 08:00:04+00:00): Nu edits in  Nederland.. daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-12-09 15:38:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
archpdx (2021-08-23 20:54:28+00:00): Hi,

I noticed in this changeset you added Shuksan Way as a one way street. Based on the imagery this doesn't seem to be the case. I've reverted this road back to a two way street.