piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-31 17:17:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
josmougn (2018-04-01 16:57:56+00:00): salut
Promenade de Lisle le long de l'Yvette avec highway=path par defaut les vélos sont autorisés, pas la peine d'ajouter bicycle=yes 
:-)
user_5359 (2018-04-01 14:09:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Alexander-II (2018-03-31 22:40:48+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ. В этом пакете правок вы удалили объект https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162932284 и создали вместо него такой же по смыслу, но другой формы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575090196 Так делать не рекомендуется, потому что при удалении теряется история удаленного объекта. Если неточность можно устранить, исправив существующий объект — удалять не рекомендует.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:28:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
sorcrosc (2018-03-31 19:52:34+00:00): Scusa ma non sei di grande aiuto con questi enormi blocchi di edifici che hai tracciato.
Anche perché è evidente che le immagini PCN 2012 sono la scelta peggiore. Avresti almeno potuto notare che sono completamente sovrapporti alle strade.
simone_girardelli (2018-03-31 20:43:00+00:00): Diffatti ho sospeso la mappatura di quell'area, e sono passato ad aree più isolate.

Mi spiace per la cattiva mappatura.
eggie (2018-03-31 19:40:02+00:00): Niet op de gebouwen taggen, maar op de adresnodes. De adressen zijn toch al aanwezig. Nu komt alles dubbel in de database. 
Een reactie stellen we ook op prijs.
yopaseopor (2018-04-02 20:49:23+00:00): No estoy de acuerdo, faltan etiquetas, el que ha borrado vías correctas has sido tú, no yo (te recuerdo que escribiste literalmente "desastre",). Y no es cierto que haga tres semanas que no te respondo, además que has contado también la Semana Santa. Es una pena, el mapa ahora está menos completo e incorrecto en alguno de los tramos modificados por tus acciones.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2018-04-05 17:51:37+00:00): Hi yopaseopor, nice to get in touch again!

Would you be so kind of explaining us which information has been lost?

About what you said about the 3 weeks issue, last message I received from you was on 2018-03-08 22:16 CEST.

I guess you didn't receive my message on 2018-03-10 15:40 CEST requesting the documentation regarding your justification for reverting my contribution, which -I will remember you- you sent me on 2018-03-08 08:05 CEST, about 8 hours after the revert you did in just 6 hours after I contributed.

According to you changeset log, you were contributing regularly until 2018-03-22 22:06:14 (changeset #57439146). That's more than a week for having the education of providing the documentation I requested.

Please remember you did then a really strong claim, let me quote you:
"Hemos comprobado que has realizado un cambio de varios kilómetros de tamaño en los que has modificado la categoría de la N-340, pero además al cambiar las etiquetas se han borrado todas las etiquetas de adelantamientos, a lo largo de todo el recorrido. También han desaparecido las etiquetas de dirección diferenciando sentidos a lo largo del recorrido, así como sus restricciones. Es por ello que hablándolo con los compañeros de la comunidad catalana y española he revertido ese changeset en concreto, para no perder todos esos datos. [..]"

Let me translate into English, for the record:
"We have confirmed you have made a several-kilometer long change modifying the category of N-340, furthermore all overtaking tags have been removed as well as way-direction tags and their restrictions. That’s why by talking with
the fellows of the Catalonian and Spanish group I’ve reverted that changeset, to not loose all this data."

Was this true or was it a fraud?
yopaseopor (2018-04-12 21:55:11+00:00): It was true and No, what you are telling the people is not true completely. Read it. http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2018/04/no-no-estoy-contento-no-im-not-happy.html
yopaseopor (2018-04-14 13:47:05+00:00): Sigues sin entenderlo. Voy a ser análitico para que la traducción de todo ello sea aceptable y no farragosa. 
-No se trata de ser crío o no, la realidad es la que es y el que hizo un primer cambio pasándose por el forro las vías de comunicación habitual de OSM fuiste tú. Te he pasteado los nodos concretos que borraste y al rehacer las restricciones te las descuidate, Es tu problema si no sabes qué función tiene un nodo , tenga etiqueta o no.
-Es tu problema también si no sabes qué dice el Estatut d'Autonomia de Catalunya en su Artículo 140 punto 5. Que una carretera sea de una administración u otra no impide que quien la gestiona efectivamente es la Generalitat de Catalunya (por lo que sus categorías e informes de tráfico son igual de válidos, y aunque estos días suene raro recuerda que esas administraciones regionales forman parte del Estado y de su administración.)
-Es tu problema si no sabes buscar y ver las cosas que tienen diferente color, también es tu problema si no sabes leer un embed, no una imagen fija.
-Es tu problema si no sabes distinguir entre un general y un privado (que yo no pastee las conversaciones enteras e innecesarias por respeto a la privacidad de los usuarios no significa que no existan). También es tu problema si sabes sólo escoger la frase que te interesa y no toda la conversación (la empecé yo, pero veo que eso no te interesa, ni dándote la hora entera la pones).
-Y lo más grave al margen de ediciones: sigue siendo tu problema si te dedicas a insultar a la gente. Pero bueno, el que es capaz de usar un periodo vacacional como Semana Santa para intentar justificar sus argumentos no fui yo. Ya sabes quien fue. ¿Pero sabes qué? Yo no discuto con gente que me insulta. Tienes razón. Adiós.
In English you can translate it with Google Translator I will not spend any minute more to talk with people who insults me as Antonio does.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2018-04-14 17:47:52+00:00): Hi yopaseopor,

I’m genuinely surprised by how aggressive are you acting. I offer you my most sincere apologies for you feeling offended, but I truly fail to see how I’ve insulted you. My interaction with you has been restricted to rebate your affirmations with official documentation, by citing your own literal words and by avoiding so much belligerent language you’re using with me.
I use to think that people resort to belligerency when they run out of reasons -or are plain rude-. I’m totally responsible of my acts, but not of yours, they are solely your own responsibility.

I invite you to sort this out in private, because we’re already far away of the main purpose of this argument, which is about the data quality of the area in dispute.

I’m glad you finally agreed that before reverting other people’s work, one must take effort on contacting and debating with the original contributor.
Please remember how much time and effort I gave you  before reverting (+ fixing my own mistakes) and how much you gave me.
Oh, BTW, Holy Week this year began on March, 25. Easter was on April, 2; I last tried contacting you on March, 10. That’s two weeks. Also, as you can imagine, I have no way of knowing when you take holidays.

You must understand that we all must adhere to the official OSM specifications. I’ve already cited you the relevant parts. If you don’t agree with the specification, you are welcome to propose and discuss changes.  But meanwhile we all must stick to the current documentation.
In that Telegram thread you were also inquired why this segment was tagged as primary.

Please also remember all OSM contributions are public, and in the spirit of transparency, discussions about specific contributions should also be public. Hiding these debates from an involved party for over a month is so really wrong and tells so much about the actor that I can’t believe you still keep victimizing yourself.

Have a nice day
yopaseopor (2018-04-02 20:48:58+00:00): No estoy de acuerdo, faltan etiquetas, el que ha borrado vías correctas has sido tú, no yo (te recuerdo que escribiste literalmente "desastre",). Y no es cierto que haga tres semanas que no te respondo, además que has contado también la Semana Santa. Es una pena, el mapa ahora está menos completo e incorrecto en alguno de los tramos modificados por tus acciones.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2018-04-03 20:31:30+00:00): Hi yopaseopor, nice to get in touch again!

Would you be so kind of explaining us which information has been lost?

About what you said about the 3 weeks issue, last message I received from you was on 2018-03-08 22:16 CEST.

I guess you didn't receive my message on 2018-03-10 15:40 CEST requesting the documentation regarding your justification for reverting my contribution, which -I will remember you- you sent me on 2018-03-08 08:05 CEST, about 8 hours after the revert you did in just 6 hours after I contributed.

According to you changeset log, you were contributing regularly until 2018-03-22 22:06:14 (changeset #57439146). That's more than a week for having the education of providing the documentation I requested.

Please remember you did then a really strong claim, let me quote you:
"Hemos comprobado que has realizado un cambio de varios kilómetros de tamaño en los que has modificado la categoría de la N-340, pero además al cambiar las etiquetas se han borrado todas las etiquetas de adelantamientos, a lo largo de todo el recorrido. También han desaparecido las etiquetas de dirección diferenciando sentidos a lo largo del recorrido, así como sus restricciones. Es por ello que hablándolo con los compañeros de la comunidad catalana y española he revertido ese changeset en concreto, para no perder todos esos datos. [..]"

Let me translate into English, for the record:
"We have confirmed you have made a several-kilometer long change modifying the category of N-340, furthermore all overtaking tags have been removed as well as way-direction tags and their restrictions. That’s why by talking with
the fellows of the Catalonian and Spanish group I’ve reverted that changeset, to not loose all this data."

Was this true or was it a fraud?
Andre68 (2018-04-01 07:04:09+00:00): Please don't tag canals as coastlines. I can not see on aerial images, what it is. Please read tagging howtos if you need assistance. Coastlines underlie speacial rules and there are several people monitoring this special tagging.
josmougn (2020-08-27 20:32:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35398099
salut. Modif un peu ancienne pour s'en souvenir mais pourquoi avoir supprimé les tags tracktype et trailblazed ? (quitte à faire du ménage autant enlever foot=yes bicycle=yes qui sont par défaut sur un track). A +, José
marc__marc (2021-02-22 15:20:43+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575094236
c'est un terrain ou 10 terrains ?
demon_box (2018-05-04 11:53:21+00:00): ciao, volevo soltanto dirti che secondo me ha poco senso ed anzi è completamente inutile aggiungere soltanto il tag addr:city perchè è implicito essendo ricavabile dai confine.
ad esempio qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190986018
hai aggiunto soltanto addr:city=Brescia
secondo me non serve a nulla se non c'è l'indirizzo completo.
--enrico
geri-oc (2018-04-01 12:11:08+00:00): Du hattest hier Linien aus dem MP Tharandter Wald entfernt. JOSM meckert eigentlich, wenn man etwas aus einem MP entfernt. Validator vor dem Hochladen benutzen: Schönen Osterasonntag aus Freital - Gerd.
morryis (2018-04-03 14:32:20+00:00): Hallo Gerd, ja ich habe hier inner-Sektionen entfernt, da diese Wiesen schon länger nicht mehr existieren bzw aufgeforstet wurden un noch nie regulär meadows waren. Der Validator läuft eigentlich vor jedem hochladen automatisch, da muss ich wohl blind gewesen sein, mir ist zumindest nicht aufgefallen das ich etwas versehentlich entfernt habe. Hast du inzwischen alles gefixt oder soll ich noch einmal schauen was falsch gelaufen ist? Grüße aus Dresden, Moritz
geri-oc (2018-04-03 15:46:36+00:00): Alles erwischt - vermute ich. Gruß Gerd aus Freital. PS: BING ist aktueller als Sachsen WMS
VlIvYur (2018-04-01 18:50:40+00:00): Привет
Что такое Старе=Кладовище?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-03 04:50:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56019412, 56066409, 56200598, 56201936, 56202082, 56202886, 56203104, 56203119, 56203121, 56203149, 56203167, 56203201, 56203237, 56203283, 56203367, 56203383, 56203400, 56203415, 56203427, 56203437, 56203457, 56203468, 56203496, 56203532, 56203556, 56203573, 56203704, 56203731, 56203780, 56203813, 56203867, 56203981, 56204091, 56204134, 56204147, 56204184, 56204208, 56204230, 56204243, 56204298, 56204326, 56204339, 56204357, 56204384, 56204403, 56204427, 56204464, 56204475, 56204524, 56204548, 56204567, 56204720, 56227223, 56228303, 56228311, 56228366, 56228404, 56228415, 56228435, 56228455, 56228874, 56229067, 56229129, 56229169, 56229308, 56229330, 56229404, 56229891, 56229902, 56229966, 56229997, 56230021, 56230132, 56230170, 56230189, 56230342, 56230491, 56230554, 56230601, 56230745, 56230899, 56231026, 56231122, 56231165, 56231197, 56231240, 56232448, 56232480, 56232489, 56232567, 56232922, 56232952, 56232961, 56233090, 56233107, 56233148, 56233170, 56246335, 56246821, 56247120, 56247383, 56247556, 56422516, 56422538, 56422560, 56741647, 56816826, 56862029, 56862248, 56862280, 56862316, 56862357, 56862395, 56862437, 56862478, 56862529, 56862565, 56862607, 56862640, 56862676, 56862708, 56862744, 56862776, 56862810, 56862849, 56862889, 56862931, 56862974, 56863022, 56863065, 56863099, 56863131, 56863158, 56863188, 56863219, 56863243, 56863271, 56863478, 56863521, 56863567, 56863593, 56863649, 56863684, 56863719, 56863765, 56863810, 56863848, 56863901, 56863946, 56863996, 56864053, 56864096, 56864167, 56864224, 56864661, 56864788, 56864850, 56864903, 56864955, 56865025, 56865097, 56865150, 56865210, 56865272, 56865330, 56865383, 56865456, 56865520, 56865591, 56865658, 56868179, 56874287, 56874468, 56874552, 56874671, 56874737, 56874813, 56874904, 56875021, 56875140, 56875259, 56875531, 56875976, 56876179, 56876355, 56876617, 56876737, 56876842, 56877096, 56877214, 56877334, 56877446, 56877560, 56877660, 56877759, 56877865, 56877986, 56878089, 56878175, 56878256, 56878329, 56878417, 56878597, 56893711, 56893866, 56894156, 56907019, 56907114, 56907213, 56907316, 56907416, 56907514, 56907610, 56907707, 56907786, 56907871, 56907986, 56908074, 56908160, 56908257, 56908424, 56908539, 56908698, 56908791, 56908942, 56909100, 56909266, 56923710, 56923798, 56923852, 56923943, 56924058, 56924198, 56924316, 56924406, 56924505, 56924593, 56924683, 56924795, 56925530, 56926539, 56926865, 56926973, 57004580, 57004636, 57004801, 57004951, 57005212, 57005331, 57005369, 57005551, 57005582, 57005592, 57005639, 57005649, 57005826, 57005946, 57006131, 57006306, 57006557, 57006855, 57008080, 57008211, 57008341, 57008949, 57009220, 57009573, 57009652, 57009839, 57009848, 57009971, 57010012, 57010115, 57010231, 57010293, 57010314, 57010317, 57010508, 57010574, 57010587, 57010639, 57010831, 57010874, 57011082, 57011278, 57011576, 57011880, 57012416, 57012450, 57558201, 57572147.
wulankhairunisa (2019-07-22 03:54:59+00:00): Halo Rizki,

Pemberian tag name=Rumah pada objek bangunan adalah tidak tepat, meskipun bangunan itu diperuntukan untuk rumah tempat tinggal. 
Jika memang ingin menambahkan informasi tersebut, Anda bisa berikan tag yg lebih spesifik seperti building=house atau building=residential daripada hanya building=yes.

Sila buka link ini untuk info terkait residential dan house
*) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse
*) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential

Kemudian untuk pemberian tag "name=jalan" pada objek jalan juga tidak tepat, karena dengan memberikan tag "highway=... " sudah untuk memberikan informasi bahwa objek tersebut adalah Jalan. 
Key "name" tepatnya harus diisikan dengan spesifik nama jalan itu sendiri, contoh "name=Jalan Rasuna Said".

Semoga membantu :)
rizkiramadhan (2019-07-22 04:29:28+00:00): Halo,

Terima kasih atas koreksi, masukan serta informasinya.

Untuk meluruskan saja, dulu saya mendigitasi daerah ini dan beberapa daerah lain di Kalimantan dalam rangka event Mapping Party 2018 lalu.. dan dalam ketentuan perlombaan tersebut tidak dijelaskan terlalu detail ketentuan pemberian tag pada building ataupun jalan dan waterway. Jadi maaf kalau banyak tag yang harus dikoreksi

Sekali lagi, terima kasih banyak atas koreksi, masukan, dan informasinya. Saya juga sampai sekarang masih ingin terus belajar untuk berkontribusi di OSM

Terima Kasih :)
eggie (2018-03-31 18:51:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-31 18:57:36+00:00): Hier staan wat wonderlijke tags op deze weg. Je mag er niet rijden, maar wel 50km/u Je mag er niet lopen foot=no tag je, maar wel fietsen. Ik kijk even hoe het precies zit. 
De weg stond al op motor_vehicle=destination
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-03-31 19:20:22+00:00): herstel... het stond op vehicle=destination, maar in je 2de changeset is het weer correct. Beetje dubbelop met motor_vehicle = destination erbij. 
Goed dat je om een review vraagt. mapse verder.
eggie (2018-03-31 19:01:28+00:00): Volgens mij was het oorspronkelijk al goed getagd. Onder vehicle valt al alles dat rijdt. Maar dit is inderdaad beter.
Casey_boy (2018-03-31 18:40:11+00:00): Changes will need reverting once building works are complete.
gurglypipe (2024-11-21 15:28:38+00:00): Diversion finally removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159414837 (oops, we forgot to update it sooner!)
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-03 04:50:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56019412, 56066409, 56200598, 56201936, 56202082, 56202886, 56203104, 56203119, 56203121, 56203149, 56203167, 56203201, 56203237, 56203283, 56203367, 56203383, 56203400, 56203415, 56203427, 56203437, 56203457, 56203468, 56203496, 56203532, 56203556, 56203573, 56203704, 56203731, 56203780, 56203813, 56203867, 56203981, 56204091, 56204134, 56204147, 56204184, 56204208, 56204230, 56204243, 56204298, 56204326, 56204339, 56204357, 56204384, 56204403, 56204427, 56204464, 56204475, 56204524, 56204548, 56204567, 56204720, 56227223, 56228303, 56228311, 56228366, 56228404, 56228415, 56228435, 56228455, 56228874, 56229067, 56229129, 56229169, 56229308, 56229330, 56229404, 56229891, 56229902, 56229966, 56229997, 56230021, 56230132, 56230170, 56230189, 56230342, 56230491, 56230554, 56230601, 56230745, 56230899, 56231026, 56231122, 56231165, 56231197, 56231240, 56232448, 56232480, 56232489, 56232567, 56232922, 56232952, 56232961, 56233090, 56233107, 56233148, 56233170, 56246335, 56246821, 56247120, 56247383, 56247556, 56422516, 56422538, 56422560, 56741647, 56816826, 56862029, 56862248, 56862280, 56862316, 56862357, 56862395, 56862437, 56862478, 56862529, 56862565, 56862607, 56862640, 56862676, 56862708, 56862744, 56862776, 56862810, 56862849, 56862889, 56862931, 56862974, 56863022, 56863065, 56863099, 56863131, 56863158, 56863188, 56863219, 56863243, 56863271, 56863478, 56863521, 56863567, 56863593, 56863649, 56863684, 56863719, 56863765, 56863810, 56863848, 56863901, 56863946, 56863996, 56864053, 56864096, 56864167, 56864224, 56864661, 56864788, 56864850, 56864903, 56864955, 56865025, 56865097, 56865150, 56865210, 56865272, 56865330, 56865383, 56865456, 56865520, 56865591, 56865658, 56868179, 56874287, 56874468, 56874552, 56874671, 56874737, 56874813, 56874904, 56875021, 56875140, 56875259, 56875531, 56875976, 56876179, 56876355, 56876617, 56876737, 56876842, 56877096, 56877214, 56877334, 56877446, 56877560, 56877660, 56877759, 56877865, 56877986, 56878089, 56878175, 56878256, 56878329, 56878417, 56878597, 56893711, 56893866, 56894156, 56907019, 56907114, 56907213, 56907316, 56907416, 56907514, 56907610, 56907707, 56907786, 56907871, 56907986, 56908074, 56908160, 56908257, 56908424, 56908539, 56908698, 56908791, 56908942, 56909100, 56909266, 56923710, 56923798, 56923852, 56923943, 56924058, 56924198, 56924316, 56924406, 56924505, 56924593, 56924683, 56924795, 56925530, 56926539, 56926865, 56926973, 57004580, 57004636, 57004801, 57004951, 57005212, 57005331, 57005369, 57005551, 57005582, 57005592, 57005639, 57005649, 57005826, 57005946, 57006131, 57006306, 57006557, 57006855, 57008080, 57008211, 57008341, 57008949, 57009220, 57009573, 57009652, 57009839, 57009848, 57009971, 57010012, 57010115, 57010231, 57010293, 57010314, 57010317, 57010508, 57010574, 57010587, 57010639, 57010831, 57010874, 57011082, 57011278, 57011576, 57011880, 57012416, 57012450, 57558201, 57572147.
Glassman (2018-04-01 01:53:32+00:00): Can you add a tag to describe the business. For example office=employment_agency. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office for more options.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57696522
eggie (2018-03-31 19:49:04+00:00): Nette edit.. en je source klopt ook nu :)
eggie (2018-04-01 09:23:50+00:00): AH aangepast.. info naar adresnode .. adres van gebouw zelf gehaald.
eggie (2018-03-31 19:41:42+00:00): Graag bijtaggen op de adresnode .. niet op het gebouw zelf.
eggie (2018-03-31 19:46:18+00:00): info heb ik op de adresnode gezet.. adres verwijderd van gebouw.
Graag reactie
PascalleS (2018-04-01 08:04:11+00:00): Hallo, ik heb geen idee wat ik fout gedaan heb ik heb bij de Aldi zelf het adres ingevuld is dit niet goed ? 
Groetjes
eggie (2018-04-01 08:55:03+00:00): Dag Pascalle... nee.. we taggen op de adresnodes.
het gebouw heet immers geen Aldi. Het bedrijf heet Aldi. 
De info hoort dus op de adresnode. Danzie je ook het symbool. Het is een afspraak die we als OSM community hebben gemaakt.
Maps.me is geen ideale editor. Kijk eens in www.openstreetmap.org met een online editor als iD of potlatch2. Dan zie je veel meer. Een voogaande mapper had de Aldi overigens ook al op het gebouw gezet.
De Adressen horen nooit op een gebouw. Die had je erbij getagd terwijl ze al aanwezig waren op de adresnode. Kijkhoe het er nu uitziet zoals ik het heb veranderd.
In ieder geval bedankt voor je reactie. Wanneer je er nog niet uitkomt neem nog even contact op of reageer hier even.
eggie (2018-04-01 12:06:14+00:00): Kijk even hier op het forum.. dan zie je wat het probleem is bij maps.me. het geeft een enorme vervuiling van de database. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=692530#p692530

Dus maps.me leuk voor onderweg, maar thuis graag aanpassen met potlatch2, josm of iD.
Mapse verder.