piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BPTT (2023-12-14 21:01:00+00:00): Hello! I'm really curious how/where you found the name Overlook Lakes for the Greendale neighborhood with W names. The F streets neighborhood was also named - Overlook Farms - but I can't corroborate this anywhere else, online or offline.
BPTT (2023-12-14 21:05:46+00:00): Aha! Never mind - I just found the name in Street View, on a stone wall. I guess that makes it more of a subdivision or condo/apt complex name than a neighborhood name, but what do you think?
AwwJeez (2023-12-14 21:08:15+00:00): Heya! I saw the monument sign when driving by on 92nd Street. The community website is here: https://www.overlooklakes.com/
BPTT (2023-12-14 21:11:18+00:00): Thanks! Are there m/any others? I based my edits on Greendale's neighborhood names and boundaries on the maps in the comprehensive plan document. But they're all simply referred to by the letters of the streets they contain. Frustrating!
AwwJeez (2023-12-14 21:11:38+00:00): Ah, you got me before I could reply. I have this only on the residential land use instead of any administrative boundaries where I believe the neighborhood distinction lives. I could be mistaken with the tag so I'm happy to defer on that. Perhaps this whole land use should be apartment complex instead of residential?
BPTT (2023-12-14 21:14:26+00:00): Dunno! I'm happy to defer to you on that. I'm really only concerned with neighborhood boundaries and names so Wandrer.earth updates with them. I also noticed Overlook Farms has unusual, red wooden signs with the name at entrance points along 76th St, but I can't find any other Greendale neighborhoods like these two.
sovereign_ch (2019-07-22 09:14:06+00:00): Hi, in Vespucci ist zur Zeit (seit V13.0 oder V13.1) ein kleiner Bug vorhanden: das Zusammenziehen einer Linie auf einen Punkt löscht die Linie nicht mehr, sondern lädt sie als "one-node-way" (Linie bestehend aus einem einzigen Knoten) wieder hoch.

Sichtbar ist der Fehler im OSMI (Layer Geometry). Falls die betroffene Linie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23514167) nicht für einen Bugreport benötigt wird, würde ich sie demnächst gerne löschen. ;-)

Da ich selber Vespucci mangels Endgerät nicht verwende, kann ich den Bug weder bei mir reproduzieren, noch einen allfälligen Bugfix überprüfen; dies müsste jemand übernehmen, der mit der Software arbeitet.

HTH und Gruss
datendelphin (2019-07-22 19:10:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe den way entfernt. Werde dem noch nach gehen in Vespucci.
eggie (2019-07-20 21:06:21+00:00): Hier is op de adresnode bijgetagd. Dat is correct.. phone in OSM begint met +31.....
viloan (2019-07-20 19:57:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-07-20 21:07:11+00:00): Helemaal correct hier...
Gr eggie
Qitay (2019-07-21 11:43:49+00:00): Ta droga nie wygląda na most - poprawiam to już
SurvivalWedlugDębowegoLiścia (2019-07-21 11:57:18+00:00): Witam, nie wygląda bo nie jest to most. :) Dopiero zaczynam edycję i miało to być most w pewnym punkcie (przeciencie rzeki Perznica oraz jej dopływu w drugiej drodze. Dziękuje za poprawę, jestem początkujący.  Pozdrawiam !
BCNorwich (2021-02-13 17:28:34+00:00): Hi, looks like you've added surface=asphalt to the nodes of some highways. I've removed about 30 of them there may be more. I think the nodes, as well as the ways, were selected when the tag was added. Perhaps you could check.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-02-13 17:30:04+00:00): Yes there are a lot more.
Aleksandr_Pa (2019-07-20 20:40:20+00:00): заметку 1535334
voschix (2019-12-20 11:02:53+00:00): Hi. Noticed that you touched the boundary relation for Padova. Would be helpful to have source and comment in the changeset to understand what you modified. Regards from Italy
NyanSten (2019-12-20 11:22:40+00:00): Hi, I just added Czech translations
voschix (2019-12-20 11:26:46+00:00): Thanks. It would be helpful if that information was in the changeset - this way I would not need to be worried of accidental changes in geometry and things like that.
NyanSten (2019-12-20 11:30:58+00:00): Changes in geometry will be changes in the outer ways, not in the relation itself. But sure, I will add more information to the changeset in the future.
4004 (2019-07-20 22:07:24+00:00): литовцы возможно не оценят
Prusaker (2019-07-22 07:33:54+00:00): Я случайно "залез" за границу РБ.
Prusaker (2019-07-22 07:41:05+00:00): Поправил
Hjart (2019-07-20 20:58:38+00:00): Please note that I have removed this "bookmark" from OSM
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-23 19:23:25+00:00): Hi awzxec, welcome to OSM.

First of all, please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

2nd: Did you map some #duplicate information? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683550811

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72469386

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
BCNorwich (2019-08-05 08:05:51+00:00): Looks OK
ma-rt-in (2019-07-20 23:12:36+00:00): Hallo,
laut https://www.hamburg.de/baustellen/
handelt es sich um eine Deckensanierung die bis 4.8.19 abgeschlossen sein soll. Bitte entferne das construction=yes, was sowieso falsch wäre. Du könntest höchstens, was aber eigentlich auch unnötige ist, ein conditional restriction setzen.
vg
Qitay (2019-07-21 11:46:07+00:00): Jeśli korzystasz z edytora w przeglądarce (iD) to możesz użyć skrótu klawiszowego "Q" co wyprostuje kąty w obszarze.
pio2_122 (2019-07-21 13:02:06+00:00): A najlepszą opcją jest użycie warstwy "polska.e-mapa.net: Buildings" - są to oficjalne obrysy budynków ze Starostwa Powiatowego.
pio2_122 (2019-07-21 13:04:12+00:00): Dla informacji dodam, że lista podkładów/warstw jest dostępna po wciśnięciu przycisku "B" w edytorze.
BCNorwich (2019-07-21 08:56:01+00:00): Hi, 

I want to inform you that you are still making disruptive mistakes. Probably because of a lack in understanding OSM practices. 

A major problem with this changeset is that you have misaligned the A636 onto an incorrect junction position. This will cause routers not to give correct information to drivers. Thus bringing OSM into disrepute.

Please go back on all your mapping and correct the mistakes.

Bernard.
user_10149683 (2019-07-24 05:17:25+00:00): Hi Bernand,
Thank you For Notifying Me of it 
I will correct it  ASAP
Any Further Enquiries Please do not hesitate to contact me  
Yours sincerely
Luke
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 17:35:49+00:00): Looks OK
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 14:50:25+00:00): With https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556610351/history I'd suggest commenting in the changeset that added it in the first place.  It's probably _something_ - but what is something that you'll have to work out with the original mapper.
Best Regards,
Andy
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-22 23:11:20+00:00): Hi TZLNCTV, this road should not be highway=primary in its entirety. Parts of SR 28 and SR 73 certainly could be, based on connectivity, but for instance the stretch of SR 350 going through Fort Ancient isn’t even built to the usual state highway standards, and I suspect there are other problematic areas too. Even though on paper it would seem to be a decent connection between the two cities, parts can be windy and slow, and there are weight restrictions all along.

What do you think about reverting SR 350 back to secondary and promoting SR 73 from New Vienna to Wilmington?
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-23 08:01:42+00:00): Changeset 72541941 reverts part of this changeset from Cuba to Leesburg. The bypass around New Vienna that you formed from township roads is nothing like what I’d expect of primary roads: they’re narrow, don’t have a double yellow line running down the middle, and at some points the pavement is so worn is looks almost like gravel. I retagged those roads as unclassified.

In case it helps, we have some Ohio-specific examples of each road classification that you can use as a guide:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Map_features#Road_classifications
TZLNCTV (2019-07-25 22:13:14+00:00): Hello. Apologies for the issues from this changeset, as I should have reviewed the existing data more thoroughly. My reclassifications attempt to resolve the problem I've noticed where roads between county seats are not marked as primary when they are, at least relative to those around them. As these particular county seats are farther apart than most of the others, I'll go ahead and change OH-350 to secondary, and leave the SR-28 primary ending at Leesburg until I figure out something west of that point.
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-28 04:29:11+00:00): Thanks for taking care of reverting those changes.

I’m curious about your effort to form continuous primary routes between county seats. Were your changes motivated by cartographic concerns perhaps? Or does ODOT have a program to directly connect county seats with primary roads? I know that was the case back in the days of the intercounty road system, but a lot of those roads are now fragmented by newer developments and realignments, especially in Southwest Ohio. Plus it seems like ODOT is more focused on limited-access bypasses and such.
TZLNCTV (2019-08-18 19:49:26+00:00): Hello. (Apologies for the extremely late response)

One of the main reasons I've been adding continuous primary routes between county seats is because the county seats are almost always the largest towns in the county; additionally, they usually have the highest concentration of services (and, of course, primary routes are intended to connect the largest towns). 

As a result, I've been thinking of primary routes in more relative terms, with county seats as the nodes in a sort of mesh of primary routes. It makes no sense for the primary routes to be limited to between state capitals, so the next level down in the hierarchy are county seats.

A minor thought of mine was traffic distribution; if there are no marked direct roads across, routing systems may place you on a route going through another county seat in the process. In low-population counties this may not be much of a concern, but in higher-population counties it can consolidate traffic, increasing congestion on the mentioned primary road. Adding a primary route directly between the two county seats could ease congestion by distributing the traffic.
grelus (2023-06-29 13:27:23+00:00): co to jest za szlak pieszy? czy jest on wyznakowany w terenie? czy gdzieś jest informacja na jego temat?
Qitay (2023-06-29 17:57:02+00:00): Nie mogłem nic w sieci znaleźć więcej, ale tu jest, oznakowanie też jest na zdjęciu: https://www.barwice.pl/sites/default/files/attachments/2021-09/POM%20BARWICE.pdf#page=29
Nikolay Chukanov (2019-07-22 09:33:45+00:00): Карта возраста зданий Белгорода - https://belgorod.m207.ru/
eggie (2019-07-23 07:52:15+00:00): Why edits all over the wordld in one changeset?? That will harm the map.
Gr eggie
Nikolay Chukanov (2019-07-23 15:30:20+00:00): No, it will not.
I rejected changes which has nothing to do with Belgorod. There are just 4 ways affected which are in USA and Nederlands.
If you download the change set, you'll see that.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-24 21:01:52+00:00): What's actually the source of this data?
kasmar00 (2019-07-31 20:49:24+00:00): Hej, przy zmianie nazwy tej drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186050868 nie zmieniłeś nazwy ulicy w adresie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461867498. Może to powodować błędy w wyszukiwarkach. Poprawiłem już ten adres.
PS. Stosuj bardziej opisowe opisy zmian, najlepiej różne dla każdego zestawu, tak żeby opisywały co faktycznie się w nim zawiera np. "Puszczykowo: poprawa nazwy ulicy Zapłaty, dodanie parkingów". Ułatwi to innym w przyszłości zrozumienie twoich edycji.
user_5359 (2019-07-21 04:04:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Has this cafe a name or a website?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:22:37+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6632167278/history
Carlos Brys (2019-07-20 23:21:44+00:00): Segun lo indicado por el MOCP,
la forma de referenciar las rutas nacionales NO lleva el guón medio.
Debería ser ref=PY03
Vea:
https://www.mopc.gov.py/mopcweb/application/files/5815/6327/5970/mapa_con_leyenda.jpg
user_5359 (2019-07-21 04:02:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you want to rename a street, please don't overpaint the street (independent with the right or false highway value). Mark the street and rename it.
n76 (2019-07-21 16:53:23+00:00): I disagree about reclassifying La Pata between the high school and san clemente as a freeway: The presence of a bicycle lane, etc. mean that it does not meet the legal requirements of a limited access highway.

My previous thought that it was a primary but I'd agree to trunk.

And what is it about deleting and then redrawing part of the south bound way? That lost the previous edit history for no good reason I can see.
Fluffy89502 (2019-07-21 23:32:47+00:00): Bicycles are definitely allowed on certain freeways. in California by default bicycles are allowed on freeways unless the department that controls the freeway erects signs that state the bicycles are not allowed. See http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=21960&lawCode=VEH

and

https://web.archive.org/web/20190514231411/https://dot.ca.gov/hq/paffairs/faq/faq67.htm
n76 (2019-07-22 01:10:19+00:00): FWIW, after your changes I drove that road this morning to verify my recollections and to get photos for OpenStreetCam.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

In particular a motorway needs to have no pedestrians on it. There are no signs prohibiting pedestrians at either end, nor are there the customary for California "Begin Freeway" and/or "End Freeway" signs. On northbound La Pata there is a sidewalk while south bound there is also pedestrian access where the Forster Ranch Ridgeline Trail connects with the trails on the east side via an over pass.
Fluffy89502 (2019-07-22 14:25:00+00:00): If no one has by then I’ll make those changes that you just mentioned. However those “Freeway Entrance” and “Toll Road Entrance” signs are just a Caltrans/state of California thing. Local freeways usually do no have those signs (such as the freeway portion of Jamboree Road, which is not under the jurisdiction of Caltrans as defined in Sections 90 & 461 of the Streets and Highways Code, in Tustin and Irvine none of the ramps or main road have “Freeway Entrance” signs)

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=90&lawCode=SHC

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=461&lawCode=SHC
Fluffy89502 (2019-07-22 14:26:09+00:00): My bad I meant section 561 and the second link should be the following:
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=561&lawCode=SHC

~~Thank you for informing me of the aforementioned!
DavidKewley (2019-07-27 20:20:02+00:00): You turned links between two driveways and La Pata into trunk_link (for the Riding Park and for Gateway Place). Do me, they do not meet the description of a "sliproad / ramp", but rather simply a place where a driveway meets a major road.

Why did you do this? I'd suggest turning them back into driveways, with the possible exceptions of the left turn lane into Gateway Place and the left turn lane from the Riding Park onto La Pata.
abakus_uploader (2019-07-21 22:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Carlos Brys (2019-07-21 10:22:00+00:00): Usted ha extendido el trazado de la PY01 sobre la RN7 sin preservar las etiquetas previas. Esta es una pérdida de datos considerable y puede llevar a confusiones si no se mantienen los datos anteriores.
Le sugiero considere revertir sus modificaciones, o en todo caso completar todo el trazado de la ex RN7 con los datos originales.
Carlos Brys (2019-07-21 10:31:06+00:00): Además, no alcanza con cambiar sólo las etiquetas de los nombres y las referencias, simultáneamente se deben editar las relaciones de las rutas.
Carlos Brys (2019-07-21 10:33:44+00:00): Se sugiero que coordine con las decisiones consensuadas de la comunidad de OSM de Paraguay, antes de continuar modificando el mapa.
woodpeck (2019-07-21 09:52:33+00:00): Erstens ist "operator=Indentitäre Bewegung" vermutlich ein Tippfehler (richtig: "Identitär"), zweitens scheint mir das aber nicht korrekt zu sein (ausser es würde ein grosses Schild am Haus stehen, das diesen Schluss zulässt) - die verlinkte Webseite würde eher auf "operator=Flamberg e.V." hinweisen.

Warum hast Du in diesem Changeset eine Überwachungskamera gelöscht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6480730686/history) - ist die nicht mehr vorhanden?
viloan (2019-07-21 00:21:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Richard (2019-09-03 11:53:14+00:00): Hi,

I can't see way 706085473 (Sycamore Hollow Rd) on imagery anywhere - is it a newly constructed road?

Richard
TZLNCTV (2019-09-07 17:16:38+00:00): Hello,

There was a map I saw not long ago that showed what appeared to be a road under construction (near completion) along this alignment. I can't remember where I found it at this point, but it showed the road as some sort of cutoff between the two roads. I'll look to see if I can find it again and respond if I do.
user_5359 (2019-07-21 04:09:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more information (like address and contact information). The note content is normally writen as office=lawer (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dlawyer)
joelmurray (2019-09-06 09:45:30+00:00): The gift shop has moved to where the Castle Cafe is now, further inside the castle.
VictorIE (2023-06-06 19:32:16+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240259100/history

Note that EirCodes are specific to individual post points (housing units or commercial buildings). They do not cover a neighbourhood.
eggie (2019-07-21 06:58:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Gebouwen en adressen zijn allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster. Adressen hoeven dus niet zelf aangemaakt te worden. Gewoon even zoeken naar de juiste adresnode. De gebouwen staan nu nog steeds op constructie.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-21 07:07:05+00:00): Van het westelijke gebouw heb je alle tags verwijderd, maar de lege way laten staan. Wanneer het gebouw gesloopt is kan de way ook weg.
Kijk je nog even?
De andere gebouwen heb ik van constructie gezet. De leisure dance heb ik op de BAG adresnode gezet.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-21 07:08:46+00:00): Het gebouw dat je hebt verwijderd was een proposed construction en zou op deze plaats worden gebouwd.
eggie (2019-07-21 07:12:38+00:00): Je hebt het gesloopte gebouw gebouw verwijderd zie ik nu. Het is oke zo.
Lantea (2019-07-21 22:24:08+00:00): Ah dank je voor je hulp! Ben hier inderdaad nog nieuw bij, dus ik apprecieer het. Het westelijk gebouw is inderdaad gesloopt, en de nieuwe constructie is al onderweg. Die aftakking van de rijswijkstraat bestaat inderdaad niet meer, maar ik wou voor de eerste keer zo min mogelijk edits maken. Ik zal hem nu verwijderen.
nevw (2019-07-22 02:11:08+00:00): Hi
you seem to have deleted the gazetted boundary of the McEuen State Forest and replaced it with the boundary of the tree cover instead. The tree cover from satellite imagery and the actual gazetted boundary are normally mapped as separate items.

I suggest that I re-map the gazetted boundary for the state forest as I have the dataset to assist with that and leave you to map the tree cover.

landuse=forest is a tag used to encompass forestry operation land. The natural=wood tag is normally used for natural tree cover instead of the commercial forestry timber treed areas. There is a landcover=trees tag which would probably solve the problem of mapping trees where forestry areas and natural areas coexist but as far as I know it does not render on the OpenStreetMap standard map. So in the mean time the natural=wood is generally used if a mapper is putting a boundary around an area of trees that is partially forest and partially natural wood cover.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover
nevw (2019-07-23 00:14:58+00:00): Hi
I added the McEuen State Forest and varied the tree cover boundary in a few places near the town.