piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chnav (2018-04-13 05:56:25+00:00): Здравствуйте, это всего лишь вторая ваша правка и сразу столько удалений. Пожалуйста НИЧЕГО не удаляйте пока не наберетесь достаточно опыта. Если есть неправильная геометрия улиц - их надо исправлять, а не удалять и перерисовывать заново. Эта правка неприемлема и полностью откачена. Пожалуйста уважайте чужой труд, Восстанавливать очень непросто и требует много времени на разбирательство. Спасибо.
mueschel (2018-04-16 09:51:57+00:00): Hi,
could you check this waterway? The tag 'brie=yes' looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579345704

Cheers, Jan
chnav (2018-04-13 06:11:22+00:00): Здравствуйте, так же как в предыдущей правке вы удалили полигон 33 микрорайона и нарисовали его заново. Надо было просто поменять геометрию. Я восстановил. Также большая просьба не прилеплять контуры микрорайонов к улицам, чтобы впоследствии было проще править их геометрию.
chnav (2018-04-13 06:12:21+00:00): Если есть вопросы вы можете задавать их на русскоязычном форуме. Там подскажут где почитать документацию и т.д.
Claudius Henrichs (2018-04-12 17:38:59+00:00): Woops. Location should ofc be "Balkayalar, Turkey" - Looked at wrong side of the border here
user_5359 (2018-04-13 16:53:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
gscholz (2018-04-16 04:50:45+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-66.16355&lat=-17.37322&zoom=18&opacity=0.71&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
JJIglesias (2018-04-18 09:24:43+00:00): Hi Guido

This masive edition of buildings in Bolivia is being made by students of Arquitecture that are doing a task commanded by one professor. They are NOT editors or mappers of OSM and most likely they will not remain in OSM after they finish this "job"; Mostly of them do not speak english and are unable to understand the requirement of the geofabrick.de quality tool.

None of them have any training or guidance of how to edit in OSM and asking them to correct their own mistakes is fruitless. Please give us a hand trying to correct what you find that could be critical; otherwise I dont see them correcting anything.

Please review and advise

BsRgds
JJ
gscholz (2018-04-18 14:03:48+00:00): On 2018-04-18 09:22:57 UTC JJIglesias wrote:

>  Hi Guido

Hi JJ (is this your real name?),

>  This masive edition of buildings in Bolivia is being made by students of Arquitecture that are doing a task commanded by one professor. They are NOT editors or mappers of OSM and most likely they will not remain in OSM after they finish this "job"; Mostly of them do not speak english and are unable to understand the requirement of the geofabrick.de quality tool.

> None of them have any training or guidance of how to edit in OSM and asking them to correct their own mistakes is fruitless. Please give us a hand trying to correct what you find that could be critical; otherwise I dont see them correcting anything.


thanks for this infomation, I was wondering about whether I got no response at all. Anyhow there are tons of errors and I would recommend to the professor to apply at least a minimum of quality control. I have fixed dozens of errors my self meanwhile but it is also no big issue to write my changset comments in spanish if this would help or educate the editors. 

Painting nice maps is not the only target of OSM, communication is an essential part of a community project as well.

Saludos Guido
JJIglesias (2018-04-18 14:10:48+00:00): Hi Guido, yes my name is Juan Jose (normally JJ). You can write to them in spanish but I feel it will not make much difference. We are written to several of them to stop place Casa, Vivienda, Edificio as "tag=name" for buildings and None has change their behaviour even writing them in Spanish. As I said they are not trained in the tool and are making these just to comply with the "job"for the University. Best Regads JJ
pitscheplatsch (2018-04-13 10:52:25+00:00): Hi Nüvi55,

may I know the reason why you removed the highway tag? Thanks.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52823943
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
ndm (2018-04-12 19:56:50+00:00): This is already mapped as a landuse area.
kaltuna (2018-04-14 04:05:29+00:00): Hallo Grüss dich, in diesem Changeset zur Baustelle der S-Bahn nach Gateway Gardens hast Du die Fußgänger und Radfahrerbrücke über die A5 als construction und sogar als bridge=no markiert. Das ist nicht richtig, denn erstens ist die Brücke nach wie vor physisch vorhanden (spricht gegen bridge=no, was sowieso keinen Sinn macht) und der Weg auf ihr auch nicht in Bau ist (spricht gegen highway=construction). ICh würde dich daher bitten, highway wieder zurück auf track zu ändern und bridge auf yes. Mit den anderen Tags wie foot=no, bicycle=no ist dann bereits korrekt kartiert, dass die Brücke zur Benutzung gesperrt ist.
Viele Grüße
lukie80 (2018-04-15 23:00:11+00:00): @utopolis: Danke für das Update! Ich schließe mich dem an, was kaltuna sagt. Die ab nun recht nutzlose Brücke wird erhalten bleiben.
utopolis (2018-04-16 19:59:52+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da habe ich wohl zu oft no gesetzt. Ich wollte vor allem für die Nutzer der OpenCycleMap den Hinweis auf die Sperrung geben. Habt Ihr vielleicht einen Tipp, wie man die Umleitung des über die Brücke führenden Radwegs R4 markieren kann? Vor Ort ist außerdem eine großräumige Umleitung für den weiter nördlich laufenden R8 mit Verkehrsschildern ausgewiesen.
lukie80 (2018-04-19 22:45:02+00:00): Hallo utopolis. Danke, dass du an die Radler denkst. Ich würde sagen, wenn die Sperrung länger als 6 Monate dauert, dann kann man die Radweg-Relation für R4 und R8 ändern. Möchtest du das machen, oder soll ich das tun? (Nebenbei: Weißt du ob die Trichterfeldschneise auch eine Unterführung bekommt?)
lukie80 (2018-06-26 22:36:50+00:00): Hab es ganz vergessen. R4 und Grüngürtelwanderwg ist dauerhaft gefixt. R8 noch nicht.
pitscheplatsch (2018-04-13 10:55:11+00:00): Hi warpurlgis, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=58044238
Peter Vojtek (2018-05-25 05:58:23+00:00): zdravim, vdaka za zaznacenie nazvov skal, ale navrhujem nedavat im "tourism=attraction", kedze to by potom takmer kazda skala v malych karpatoch skoncila ako turisticka atrakcia.
JanLehen (2018-05-25 18:50:49+00:00): Zdravim, tourism=atraction budem skalam asi davat aj nadalej, ale len tym, na ktorych sa lezie. Nie je ich predsa az tak vela...
Peter Vojtek (2018-05-25 18:54:56+00:00): zial tourism=attraction je dost nejasne speficikovane, takze ludia to pouzivaju na kadeco, ale skor nez to zacnete aplikovat na dalsie skaly to prosim najprv konzultuje na nasom slovenskom OSM fore s ostatnymi "kolegami" mappermi: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/osm_sk

lebo inak sa moze stat ze ked komunita nebude suhlasit s vasim oznacovanim lezeckych skal, tak vase zmeny budu zial odstranene, co by som bol nerad, kedze si cenim ze sa snazite zaznacovat zaujimave informacie.
whb (2018-04-15 16:02:41+00:00): Danke fürs Nachschauen vor Ort.
Ich denke, die 8 Hinweise, welche ich dort erstellt hatte, haben sich erledigt?
Über diese hatte ich auch den Mapper, welcher die Straßen dort zuletzt mit Ortskenntnis bearbeitet hatte, informiert, zwecks evtl. Korrektur.
Hintergrund seines Vorgehens waren übrigens Apps, welche damals bei Autos einfach Poller ignoriert haben.
Diesen Weg habe ich auch noch entsprechend der vier angrenzenden Straßen angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310345311/history
Strubbl (2020-10-07 11:35:45+00:00): Hallo MaFrVa, super, dass du diese ganzen Gebäude eingezeichnet hast.
Im iD-Editor im Browser kannst du Gebäude markieren und anschließend mit der Taste Q rechtwinklig machen. Initial war mir das bei den Doppelhäusern in der Bauernvogtskoppel aufgefallen, die ja rechtwinklig sind.
iWowik (2018-05-03 09:08:42+00:00): День добрый!
Вы неверно вносите названия улиц
Приведите, пожалуйста, их в соответствии с соглашением
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
carciofo (2018-05-10 11:05:17+00:00): Hi, I've removed the aeroway=aerodrome tag from this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5548721353. If it was added in error please remove the node completely or add an appropriate tag. Thanks
user_5359 (2018-04-13 16:49:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path.
arvdk (2018-04-12 22:42:56+00:00): Welke changeset is reverted (nummer)?
Martin Borsje (2018-04-13 05:05:26+00:00): 58045634
freebeer (2019-08-13 07:55:27+00:00): hello,

i see you used potlatch like me, so now i have an explanation why i see keys being changed, when updating other fields directly above.

but i wanted to verify this was not deliberate, as in this changeset, i see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561050955/history went from lanes=2 to s=2, where it remains today.

gracias
Elli21486 (2018-04-12 19:41:10+00:00): PS, I can't count as I meant 5
chachafish (2018-04-13 02:47:22+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. There are many ways here you have added which do not have tags. Will you please review your work and add necessary tags? Thank you
chachafish (2018-04-15 02:46:04+00:00): Many of your edits are not tagged correctly. Please review your edits and correct them. Thank you. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-104.87204&lat=39.59962&zoom=15
InessaZavada (2018-05-25 10:00:14+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, these were accidentally created. I'll be careful about this in future.
InessaZavada (2018-05-25 10:00:42+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, these were accidentally created. I'll be careful about this in future.
Dakon (2018-04-14 19:50:17+00:00): Deine Korrektur führt jetzt zum Fehler "Gebäude im Gebäude" beim Amtsgericht, da du die bisherige Teile des Gebäudes als eigenständige Gebäude markiert hast, und das building:part=yes hast du stehen gelassen. Das ist mir bei deinen Änderungen schon mehrfach aufgefallen, diesmal ist es aber in meinen Augen definitv falsch: alle Gebäude sind innen miteinander verbunden und werden durchgängig genutz, und nicht nur der Eingangsbereich ist das Gericht.

Ich habe diesen Teil deiner Änderung zurückgesetzt.
GerdP (2018-10-31 09:35:08+00:00): Hi!
Are you sure that the name of these ways is "Salt Creek Greenway Trail" ?
They are all members of a route relation called "Salt Creek Trail", so the ways probably don't have an own name, esp. not where they are sidewalks of major roads.
freebeer (2018-12-17 20:44:32+00:00): Hallo, me again...

after reading you mention a hiatus, i had to check your other changesets to see if your recent deletions were a one-off.

first, can you please use descriptive changeset descriptions - `changes with local NEO knowledge' means absolutely *nowt* to me, and means i have to look into a changeset where, had you instead written, `added building tag to amenity' your intent would have been clear, and if something went horribly wrong, it would be obvious.

anyway, i have a problem with this changeset, which can be visualised at
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=58046248
to see it is again almost completely deletions.

the first two ways below i checked looking at their histories, looks very much like the sort of vandalism that accompanies pokemon go cheating.

can you explain what is your reasoning behind deleting the school grounds?  this is the established way in osm that an educational institution is represented.

secondly, it appears you have taken an axe to a lot of trees along aurora road, again added by mapper TweedC.  do they really no longer exist?

the only non-deletion per se i see is where you removed the name Shell from an auto repair shop, so if you were not intending to do what i see you have done here, then this can probably be reverted without conflicts despite its age, as i can see looking at the map to the right, there is no indication there are two school grounds at the bottom.

fear not, even though it is not efficient for me, i will continue looking through your changesets for further damage.

(if i am seeming somewhat confused or unclear, it is because i have been unable to get more than a few minutes of sleep the last days, and it is catching up on me, and i apologise)

thanks
SABiltongHunter (2018-12-17 21:15:54+00:00): The issue for the schools is that is not the school grounds, TweedC had captured private residences, lots of them, with the big section that was drawn. The other one done by Johnny Mapperseed captured a public park and community center pool. 

As for the trees, that is on me then, I had no idea the object was to map every tree, bush and shrub so if that is the case then that is my fault but it doesn't make sense to me to map all that data. Honestly, now I see why my OSM based Navigation app is getting more and more full of meaningless imagery. Let me know and I will follow the rules, definitely not doing a Pokemon activity :)
freebeer (2018-12-19 13:56:49+00:00): peeling meself once more from me deathbed to shuffle over to the privvy, it occurs that me alzheimers is taking its toll, and i should have added more golden rules.

do not demand nor expect perfection from anyone but yourself.  strive yourself for perfection.  when you reach it, decide it isn't good enough and start over.  let those who are without sin revert the first stone.  keep mapping-related discussions in a public place where other sane and stable members of the community can contribute and point out my obvious bull-puckey.  and never ever *ever* take anything i write or say seriously.  that way be dragons.

keep an eye on developments in other parts of the world if you can understand the language; this changeset discussion just popped up today and is relevant here:
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/65566428


your secret santa^H^H^H^H^H undisclosed member of the Data Werking Grope,
freebear

NURSE!  THE MEDS!!!  BRING A MOP, I'VE DROOLED INTO ME KEZBOARD AGAIN
user_5359 (2018-04-12 20:41:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
alphensebezorger (2018-04-18 18:58:43+00:00): Hoi Martin, mijn oog viel toevallig op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52859956, die je hier als residential bestempeld. De combinatie eenrichtingsverkeer en doodlopend voor auto's (paaltje) is vast niet correct. Weet jij misschien of die oneway=yes inderdaad achterhaald is?
Oh ja, het aangeven van "PDOK" als bron is wel erg breed. Kijk maar eens op http://pdokviewer.pdok.nl/ naar alle mogelijke informatie die PDOK aanbiedt. Nou snap ik ook wel dat je de laag "Mosselzaadinvanginstallaties" hier niet gebruikt hebt, maar welke lagen wel? Gewoon "luchtfoto beeldmateriaal.nl" of "BGT" is een stuk informatiever.
Martin Borsje (2018-04-18 19:27:58+00:00): Tsja, de oneway=yes was niet van mij....
En voor een doodlopend weggtje kan dat natuurlijk niet!
Op GSV zie ik geen paaltje overigens maar sluit de weg alleen op het fietspad aan. Ik zal e.e.a. aanpassen
Martin Borsje (2018-04-18 19:30:27+00:00): En PDOK betekent voor mij default PDOK luchtfoto :-)
gscholz (2018-04-14 05:50:27+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding duplicated nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-66.17081&lat=-17.37870&zoom=18&opacity=0.74

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
RicoElectrico (2018-04-13 11:24:48+00:00): Witaj w OSM! Dzięki za dodanie żabki :)

Natomiast poprawiłbym kategorię - żabka to sklep osiedlowy, a nie supermarket. W edytorze iD to chyba "sklep ogólnospożywczy".

Jeśli masz pytania, to śmiało pisz!
viloan (2018-04-12 20:41:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Illio (2021-03-21 19:06:48+00:00): Zdravím, mohli by ste uviesť nejaké informácie a zdroj k malému jazierku, ktoré ste zakreslili cca medzi Agátovou a Hodonínskou? Na žiadnej satelitnej mape takéto jazierko nevidno.
Gh0stz0x (2018-04-13 10:16:51+00:00): Ciao Claudio62PG benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Io sposterei il numero di telefono da description e lo inserirei con il suo tag: phone=+39. .... .....
Leggi il wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Ciao 😁
Lokai (2018-04-13 08:24:57+00:00): Hallo, der Teich hat die Eigenschaft Feuerlöschteich. Nur Eigennamen erhalten den Schlüssel "name". Zu dem Friedhof am Ende des Burgwall. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:denomination. 

Ist der Friedhof noch in Betrieb?
Blasmuskant (2018-04-13 21:22:10+00:00): Guten Abend, also der Teich ist nicht mehr als Feuerlöschteich in Verwendung, wird allerdings von den Bewohnern so genannt.
Der Friedhof ist noch in Betrieb. Direkt um die Kirche herum (Kreuzung Bahnhofstraße / Kirchstieg / Am Burgwall) ist auch ein Friedhof, dieser wird allerdings nicht mehr betrieben...
Lokai (2018-04-14 11:10:40+00:00): Es ging eine PN an Sie. Gruß
evod (2018-06-28 19:31:58+00:00): Bei einer Adressänderung bitte das Objekt auch an die neue Stelle verschieben :)
Ich mach das mal für den Zauberer.
Philipp Kainz (2018-06-29 05:28:59+00:00): Vielen Dank :) Alles Liebe und zauberhafte Grüße
MadelNL (2019-09-25 14:52:27+00:00): Hoi Padvinder,

Welke bron heb je gebruikt voor het deel Dat in de gemeente Vijlen ligt? Ik ben er nu drie keer geweest (zie Mapillary Madel) en kan er met de beste wil geen pad ontdekken. Volgens BGT loopt het pad ook alleen maar tot aan de gemeentegrens.
Daarna is het maar zoeken en mag je het laatste stuk klauteren naar de veldweg op. Het bord C01 dat je noemt ontbreekt eveneens. In mijn opinie is dat niet eens de Oude Trichterweg en is dat enkel een pad om de afwatering te onderhouden en toegangsweg naar de velden.

Vriendelijke groet

EOSfoto
padvinder (2019-09-26 10:48:39+00:00): ik snap hier niets van. ik tag zo helemaal niet, met bord c01 of snelheidsbeperkingen of die ‘forward’-aanduidingen. indien met andere editor gedaan dan potlatch kan ik me nog voorstellen dat ik per ongeluk versneld een aftakking zou hebben gemaakt van de oude trichterweg met al zijn tags, maar met potlatch kan dat helemaal niet. in ieder geval kloppen hier dingen niet. ik zal vast wat veranderen. Kijk jij er ook nog eens naar. Je bent er recent nog geweest. Goed dat je e.e.a. opmerkt!
MadelNL (2019-09-27 05:48:19+00:00): Tja, de geschiedenis zegt toch dat jij deze verandering gemaakt hebt... ;)
Maakt ook verder niet uit, alleen jammer dat je en passant nog andere wijzigingen hebt gemaakt, waardoor mijn hele changeset (2300 wijzigngen...) vastliep en conflictoplossing ook geen soelaas bood. 
Hoewel ik natuurlijk niet weet waar je overal uithangt, zou ik je wel willen adviseren om je vooral te beperken tot gebieden waar je daadwerkelijk bekend bent. Ik zie dat je in heel Nederland actief bent. Luchtfoto's wekken soms de verkeerde indruk. Als actieve wandelaar zie ik vaak paden (vooral in Duitsland) die gewoon wildpaden zijn, maar door de actieve gemeenschap als gewone paden ingetekend worden. Het gevolg is dat er wel heel veel op de kaart staat, maar je er in de praktijk achter komt dat je na (soms kilometers wandelen) het pad onbegaanbaar wordt voor mensen.
In mijn geval had ik alleen te maken met een boer die zich afvroeg, waar ik aan de wandel was...
arvdk (2018-04-12 22:58:13+00:00): Fully reverted by changeset 58049602, based on comments of changeset 58037532
0. Waarschuwing: 
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Leo Slager (2018-04-12 23:18:09+00:00): Wij begrijpen heel goed dat je de veiligheid daar wilt waarborgen. Het intekenen van die veiligheidszone is dan ook een goede zaak. Het verminken van de kaart door het weghalen van allerlei zaken is daar niet de juiste methode voor. Alle wegen zijn daar al jaren voorzien van de juiste tags die voorkomen dat daar een fiets of wandelroute wordt gepland. Als bezoekers de borden negeren wordt  dat niet veroorzaakt door openStreetMap. Ook op de topografische kaart en elke luchtfoto staan die wegen en de restanten van de langdingsbaan gewoon aangegeven.  Zelfs op de plattegrond van het park  staan ze gewoon.
Robert Whittaker (2018-04-28 17:29:24+00:00): Hi, I think you may have made a few typos in the postcodes in this (and possibly some other) changesets. My tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/addresses/location-errors.cgi#SO has flagged a number of SO21 postcodes in OSM as being a long way from their official centroid, and hence probably wrong. I've already fixed SO21 1BP -> SO21 2BP, SO21 2DD -> SO21 1DD and SO21 2DE -> SO21 1DE, but you might like to look at the rest. Another tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/addresses/pc-stats/SO/SO21/ may help you find the correct postcode for these cases.
Sailor Steve (2018-05-04 23:04:00+00:00): Hi Rob,  Thanks for making the changes - I will check the locality to see if there are more.
wambacher (2018-04-13 08:59:25+00:00): Hi, this is not a "Correction" but a political motivated edit. Please don't touch this border, because this is the offical view of OSM. There are many countries which accept Palistina as a souverain country - and many do not. Therefore this border is tagged as "disputed".

regards
walter 

cs has been reverted exept alt_name:ku = Filistîn. btw: why is there no name:ku?