piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8334278 (2020-07-31 21:54:50+00:00): the end of the platform is not where the train stops, factors are, open cars, # of car's, how many engines, pushing or pulling, time of day, load,who is driving.
colgza (2021-03-15 18:04:30+00:00): The bounding box for this changeset includes both the PAAC Silver Line (in Pittsburgh), and the MBTA Silver Line (in Boston).
colgza (2021-03-15 18:04:49+00:00): What did you do?
Horza (2021-03-15 18:35:34+00:00): Had a quick look at one of the lines changed in Boston, the Green Line, looks like this changeset added a
level=-1 tag to it

Large scale tag fixing gone wrong maybe?
clay_c (2021-03-15 19:22:41+00:00): Well that's weird. Thanks for calling this to my attention; I'm taking a look
clay_c (2021-03-15 20:51:24+00:00): So here's what it looks like happened. I had been using JOSM to review MBTA rail and I must have thought I had finished, so I moved on to reviewing Pittsburgh's light rail. Turns out I had some unsaved changes in Boston and accidentally rolled those into the same changeset.

The changes in Boston seem to be only tweaking layer=* and level=* tags. The changes in Pennsylvania are aerial review of the T line between Library and Washington Junction, for example, changing service tags, or moving switches to more accurate locations.

At any rate, I no longer have the same workflow and now avoid having two different areas loaded into one JOSM layer, so this kind of mistake won't happen again.
Reeniz (2020-07-31 23:52:00+00:00): Nice description
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88800876
DaveF (2020-08-09 00:45:11+00:00): Hi
What 'usage' is this station. Looks heritage/tourism given the rolling stock.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7272762973
Railwayfan2005 (2020-08-09 11:34:15+00:00): Warwick Road was used as the starting point for charter trains using the steam locomotives and rolling stock based at Tyseley. These are suspended at the moment. It's not part of the WM network.
user_8334278 (2020-07-31 22:46:55+00:00): the end of the platform is not where the train stops, factors are, open cars, # of car's, how many engines, pushing or pulling, time of day, load,who is driving.
Zol87 (2020-08-05 05:22:08+00:00): Even if the train stop position is determined by train length, please don't delete the platforms. They are in a fixed location with a set length.
Zol87 (2020-08-08 00:14:03+00:00): Also, please do not delete the station buildings. There are other users who are tracking building permits around Chicago who need this data and have put a lot of time and energy into tagging the with details and adding them to relations for the whole train line.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-08 00:20:45+00:00): Why did you delete the station platforms and buildings here?
user_8334278 (2020-08-08 00:36:45+00:00): this is old, i put them back when he told me this is know tit for tat.
user_8334278 (2020-08-08 00:41:49+00:00): i tagged the building
user_8334278 (2020-08-08 00:54:47+00:00): clay is the one who made platforms pologons, and put in unverified stops
SomeoneElse (2020-08-08 01:03:13+00:00): "making platforms pologons" is a perfectly normal thing to do.  The "unverified stops" question I've asked at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/054669.html .
Re "i put them back when he told me", no you did not.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835160006 was re-added by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zol87 .  Similarly the statement "i tagged the building" is incorrect.  In this changeset you did not tag the building, you deleted it.
ACarlotti (2020-08-01 00:32:57+00:00): This changeset covers a very large geographic area, which makes it very hard to work out what it actually affects. The changes in Scotland and the changes near Munich should ideally have been in separate changesets (I can't easily tell if you made any changes elsewhere - if so, then it probably should have been more than two changesets).
Also, splitting up changesets that include multiple unrelated sets of changes usually makes it easier to write a useful changeset comment - "various" tells me nothing that I can't already guess from the large size of the changesets bounding box (and that bounding box doesn't tell me much either).
limes11 (2020-08-01 08:19:23+00:00): Hello Math1344,

Welcome to Osm and thank you for your contribution. There are a few issues with your changeset:

1. Check for typos: Gemeinde, Hop-on,…

2. This sculpture in Cologne seems to go by the name Steel-Watercolor-Triangle-Ring (all English) I don't think it makes a lot of sense to translate this to German but if you want to, triangle means Dreieck in this context, not Triangel. 

2. Keep it local: Do not add a waste bucket in Germany, a view point on Tenerife and and a church in Greece in the same changeset. It creates a changeset box covering half of Europe. Split it up into three changesets.

3. You used German and English expressions for the objects in Greece. While it is fine to add names in other languages, objects should always carry a name in the local language, here: Greek.

4. The museum is a duplicate, it is already in the database. It is Marathon Run Museum in English, not Race. (At least, according to their webpage.)

Would you be able to make these changes?

Best, Limes
limes11 (2020-08-12 07:29:43+00:00): Apparently not, so I did.
stefanct (2020-08-08 16:07:00+00:00): Hi,
das Stückchen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131328269 ist als highway=path getagt und das dürfte von einigen Routern als bicycle=no interpretiert werden, wenn es nicht explizit gesetzt ist. Eigentlich ist das Problem schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35161698 entstanden vor 4 Jahren, als das bicycle=designated entfernt wurde, aber das warst eh auch du ;) Wie ist denn der legale Status von dem Weg?
LG
Andreas Binder (2020-08-08 17:22:27+00:00): Dass dein Router bei highway=path von einem bicycle=no ausgeht, würde mich sehr wundern, da diese Annahme bei OSM falsch wäre (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions). Von der Beschilderung vor Ort ist es kein bicycle=designated (dazu fehlen dementsprechende Schilder). Es ist meiner Meinung nach ein bicycle=yes (was aber im highway=path bereits beinhaltet ist und daher nicht extra getaggt ist). 
Welchen Router verwendest du? Kann es sein, dass du da so eine Art "Rennradrouting" verwendest und in dadurch evtl. surface=gravel, sac_scale=hiking oder mtb:scale=0 zum Ausschluß führt?
stefanct (2020-08-08 23:55:34+00:00): Hi,

die Deutsche Wiki-Seite ist äußerst verkürzt... in Österreich
impliziert highway=path ein bicycle=dismount:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Austria

Ich hatte jetzt ein bisschen mehr Zeit es zu testen und ich glaube,
dass dies die Router hier zur massiven Abwertung der Strecke bringt.
Sie routen zwar drüber, aber nur wenn es sonst mehr als ca. 100% Umweg
bedeuten würde. Der genauer Wert variiert ein wenig, aber man dürfte
das wohl mit allen gängigen Rad-Routern triggern können - inklusive den
2 Engines auf osm.org (OSRM und graphhopper). Mir ist es mit
bikemap.net aufgefalllen - kA, was die verwenden.

Hier ist z.B. ca. der Trigger-Punkt für GraphHopper auf osm.org:
https://ibb.co/WxbzJ93
Wenn man das Ziel (rot) noch ein wenig nach oben schiebt, nimmt er die
nördliche Route, die dann ~830m statt 1.3km hat.
Andreas Binder (2020-08-09 08:01:11+00:00): Tja, mit dem bicycle=dismount in Österreich aus dem Wiki hast du recht. Hab mal bicycle=yes am Weg hinzugefügt. Schau ma mal, ob sich am Routing was ändert.
skfd (2020-09-17 12:39:53+00:00): Привет! Мне кажется  не нужно было удалять ПЛОЩА ПАШИРОВА. Всетки там есть площадь, ето значимое место и в адресации и в навигации )
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88802571
Salmonleg (2020-09-17 20:42:15+00:00): Привіт, вона там є:
вирізав фрагмент О-101316, на який виходять ці п'ять вулиць центральних і переніс назву на нього.
Дивлячись звідки номерації будинків починаються на них, то так логічніше, ніж попередній варіант і попадає в маршрути. 

Я тут просто прибрав за собою: її там взагалі не було — спочатку позначив її як place=square на цьому місці (#87890947), коли редагував школу/сільраду з відповідними адресами (#87719128), але вирішив перенести на дорогу, раз впорядкованої площі практично немає.
Salmonleg (2020-09-17 20:48:52+00:00): Можна, хіба для красоти продублювати ще і площею поверх цього куска дороги і парковки, щоб назва на карті більша була, але це дивно буде.
skfd (2020-09-20 20:35:16+00:00): Попробую точкой отметить ) мне кажется ето всетки ориентир, а на дороге не совсем видно
felipeeugenio (2020-08-01 17:32:32+00:00): Estimado. gracias por sus ediciones. Las casas quedaron entre chuecas y descuadradas. ID tiene una herramienta para copiar y pegar una vez que dio con la geometría correcta. También se puede rotar y generar efecto espejo si busca los comandos en los instructivos (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts)
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:50:00+00:00): Your choice of changeset comment isn't very well choosen. Can you give something more meaningfull?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
woodpeck (2022-05-11 21:20:55+00:00): Can you please point us to the discussion and documentation that are mandatory before executing such an import?
Kovoschiz (2020-08-01 04:22:57+00:00): 1. Sitting-out areas are `leisure=park`. 
2. `leisure=playground` means a children's playground. These "Playground"s are either `leisure=park`, or `leisure=sports_centre`.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88802996
user_5359 (2020-08-01 05:13:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5463195014/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75325568, 75325724, 75325809, 75325958, 75325968, 75326022, 75326034, 75326323, 75326327, 75326336, 75326563, 75326823, 75326884, 75327100, 75339356, 75339551, 75339726, 75339824, 75340124, 75529648, 75529943, 75531275, 75531601, 75532087.
user_5359 (2020-08-01 05:06:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2020-08-01 05:06:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
reykev (2020-08-01 06:01:49+00:00): Okay.  Thank you.
user_5359 (2020-08-01 06:10:09+00:00): You can add the address (with the keys addr:housenumber and add:street, see more https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr).
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:50:09+00:00): Your choice of changeset comment isn't very well choosen. Can you give something more meaningfull?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:50:18+00:00): Your choice of changeset comment isn't very well choosen. Can you give something more meaningfull?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:50:27+00:00): Your choice of changeset comment isn't very well choosen. Can you give something more meaningfull?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75325568, 75325724, 75325809, 75325958, 75325968, 75326022, 75326034, 75326323, 75326327, 75326336, 75326563, 75326823, 75326884, 75327100, 75339356, 75339551, 75339726, 75339824, 75340124, 75529648, 75529943, 75531275, 75531601, 75532087.
trial (2020-08-06 16:11:54+00:00): Improvement?
Well can probably go further:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292501857/history
name, int_name don't make sense to me.
See more generally https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/int_name=Aparato%20Individual%20de%20Bombeo#map
trial (2020-08-06 16:14:18+00:00): I don't speak Spanish but Centrales de generación sonds like a Diesel generator (as initially tagged) not like an oil well.
Olyon (2020-08-06 19:22:43+00:00): Je vais parler français, J'ai l'impression après vu votre historique de modifications que c'est votre langue comme moi.
En améliorant les centrales électriques d'argentine, je suis tombé sur ces milliers de int_name=Aparato Individual de Bombeo tagué avec power=generator. ce ne sont pas des générateur qui transforment le pétrole en une autre énergie mais des appareil de pompage (bombeo=pompage) qui pompe petrole ou gaz dans un champ pétrolifère (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3510099), recherchez "Aparato Individual de Bombeo" sur un moteur de recherche. J'ai supprimé les power=generator et remplacer par man_made=petroleum_well qui me semble être le tag le plus adapté.
Je n'ai pas changer les noms (name et int_name), j'ai laissé ceux déjà présent.
trial (2020-08-06 19:42:26+00:00): Oui, on peut parler français, c'est ce que j'avais commencé à faire mais voyant que ça portait sur l'Argentine je me suis dit que l'anglais était plus approprié - pas forcément. C'est effectivement en tombant sur le millier de int_name=Aparato Individual de Bombeo (Individual Pumping Device) que je me suis dit qu'il y avait un blême.
Alors oui le nom fait plus penser à un derick qu'à un groupe diesel de secours.
Mais votre source à pour sujet la génération électrique (ou c'est plus général ?), donc ça ne colle pas avec le nom. Par contre le nom de la base de données colle avec les attributs initiaux.
Et oui l'exemple que je donne est bien dans le champ pétrolifère.
Ça vaudrait le coup de commenter 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24112497
Olyon (2020-08-06 23:09:45+00:00): J'ai regardé tous les power=plant et power=generator du pays et pour beaucoup je les ai amélioré grâce a la source indiquée et aux sites internets des opérateurs des centrales. Lorsque je suis tombé sur des power=generator qui n'en étaient pas comme pour ces "AIB" j'ai changé le tag pour quelque chose de mieux.
Il aurait été sûrement préférable que je fasse un changeset rien qu'avec ces "AIB"... surtout qu'ils étaient des milliers, et donc occupent une grosse place dans mon changeset (8160 des 8379 ways) sur les centrales électriques (mais représentent peu du temps passé sur ce changeset)
Je viens de chercher avec overpass tous les int_name=Aparato Individual de Bombeo et il y a près de 9000, tous en Argentine et créé en 2014-15, la plupart c'est moi qui les ai changé en man_made=petroleum_well mais il y en a près de 700 changé il y a 2 ans en man_made=pumping_rig (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332803768)
Je ne sais pas quel tag est le plus adapté.
trial (2020-08-07 08:16:40+00:00): Ce que je comprends c'est que petroleum_well c'est le puits de pétrole et pumping_rig  le chevalet de pompage ou la plateforme de production "Cet attribut couramment utilisé par erreur
à la place de man_made=petroleum_well". Il suffit de regarder > 1 000 lieux pour mettre le bon attribut. Une pompe sans puits a peu d'intérêt sauf pour le climat^^.
user_8466505 (2020-08-01 08:53:08+00:00): Hey, I'm currently working on adding houses in Nuuanu. You can find the area by looking at changset 88809706. Do you think you could add a residential area over there? 

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:31+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75325568, 75325724, 75325809, 75325958, 75325968, 75326022, 75326034, 75326323, 75326327, 75326336, 75326563, 75326823, 75326884, 75327100, 75339356, 75339551, 75339726, 75339824, 75340124, 75529648, 75529943, 75531275, 75531601, 75532087.
mueschel (2020-08-04 11:46:35+00:00): Hi,
what does 'demand=1' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
raymatch (2020-08-08 14:44:30+00:00): Sorry, it was a mistake. Later then, i figured out that the correct way to tag what i meant is building:flats, because i want to put that this building has only 1 demand of internet. Sorry again
user_5359 (2020-08-01 05:01:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 09:23:47+00:00): Results of the revert:

grep ERR complex_revert.log | grep -v "410 Gone" | grep "^way" | wc
    287    4592   28413
grep ERR complex_revert.log | grep -v "410 Gone" | grep "^relation" | wc
      0       0       0
grep ERR complex_revert.log | grep -v "410 Gone" | grep "^node" | wc
   1104   18536  128252

Of the 287 ways, most of the form
way 732099434 ERR DELETE 409 Conflict Version mismatch: Provided 1, server had: 2 of Way 732099434

Sampling these 287 suggests that roughly half of these failed deletes were non-geographic updates (addresses, etc.) and the rest were geographic fixes.  I've not force-deleted any of those 287.

Some of the original reported errors may still remain, but I'm sure that these will get picked up in normal OSM updates.
yadathot (2020-08-01 04:16:02+00:00): Added Services and Driveways as per Private Maxar imagery.
sandroz (2020-08-01 19:03:02+00:00): Привіт. Яке зміщення мапи виставляв?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75325568, 75325724, 75325809, 75325958, 75325968, 75326022, 75326034, 75326323, 75326327, 75326336, 75326563, 75326823, 75326884, 75327100, 75339356, 75339551, 75339726, 75339824, 75340124, 75529648, 75529943, 75531275, 75531601, 75532087.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-01 07:11:37+00:00): 1. Please use `opening_hours=` or `disused:*=`, instead of modifying its name. `description=` is still better 
2. Don't remove `wikidata=`. You can directly edit tags below in iD.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88805631
seattlefyi (2020-08-02 22:37:25+00:00): Hi again, I haven't had a chance to review all of the edits, but another thing to suggest is that before moving from one editing area to another one far away, it's a good idea to save/upload your changeset. That way the change notifications are kept local. Thanks again, if you have questions please feel free to ask!
Chrysopras (2020-08-04 14:08:14+00:00): Hallo karottenjunge1,

in diesem Änderungssatz scheint etwas schiefgelaufen zu sein. Vermutlich hast Du versehentlich das falsche Element geändert. (Oder wolltest Du wirklich die bebaute Fläche von fast ganz Bad Rappenau zu einer Grasfläche erklären? ;–) Ich will’s nicht hoffen!)

Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88933635 zurückgesetzt.
Frans S (2020-08-04 14:59:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Your mapping are rather accurate. The only point is that you did not square each building with the Q key
I copy you a few advises how to improve your mappings.
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2020-08-01 22:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mike Baggaley (2020-08-04 12:29:42+00:00): Hi, please note that it is incorrect to name a highway with the name of a long distance route. There is an existing route relation with that name already attached to these ways. You can see the routes at waymarkedtrails.org which uses the OSM data (they are not shown on the standard OSM map).

Regards,
Mike
BernardV (2020-08-04 13:04:47+00:00): Thanks for that information and for that useful looking website that shows the South Downs Way.  Sorry to have upset your day!
user_5359 (2020-08-02 18:27:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
A1C_BPS=36.0
A1C_SIAK=36.0
A1N_BPS=Banten
A1N_SIAK=Banten
A2C_BPS=3601.0
A2C_SIAK=3601.0
A2N_BPS=Pandeglang
A2N_SIAK=Pandeglang
A3C_BPS=3601050.0
A3C_SIAK=3601052.0
A3N_BPS=Cigeulis
A3N_SIAK=Cigeulis
A4C_BPS=3601050001.0
A4C_SIAK=3601052007.0
A4N_BPS=Banyuasih
A4N_SIAK=Banyuasih
A4T_SIAK=Desa
OBJECTID=49449
Shape_Area=0.0021256405518900001
Shape_Leng=0.27990137534300003
YEAR=2017
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
btwhite92 (2020-08-01 15:20:19+00:00): Hello,
This changeset broke the USFS Humboldt-Toiyabe & LTBMU boundary relations by merging Old Kingsbury Grade into one way. Please be mindful of relations when working with ways that are used as part of the relation.
Also, this road is residential and not a track - its primary function is to provide access to the residential property at the midpoint of the grade, and not for forestry access/use.
Bradley
yadathot (2020-08-01 06:37:38+00:00): Modified the geometry of roads and Edited Highway tag as per Private Maxar imagery.
user_2066394 (2020-08-01 08:40:01+00:00): Ist da Grenzziehung/Fläche bewusst so gewählt oder wurde das verfrüht hochgeladen?
hongakonga (2020-08-01 09:31:49+00:00): Ja, muss ich noch weiter machen. Gibt's einen Trick? Ist schon recht viel Arbeit so...
dial25osm (2020-09-10 11:36:28+00:00): Ja, Die Meadow ist größtenteils schon sehr willkürlich positioniert. Dass der halbe Riegsee und Spatzenhausen jetzt eine Wiese wären, wäre mir neu ;)
Werde dieses Objekt an ein paar Stellen zerlegen. Eventuell wäre es auch einfacher, das peu à peu zu machen und nicht mit solchen Monster-Polygonen.
hongakonga (2020-09-10 13:11:02+00:00): Als ich vorort war und via Satellit ist's schon sehr wiesig. Aber klar. Verbesserungen sind immer gut.
user_2066394 (2020-09-10 13:23:28+00:00): Hier mal das Ausmaß:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88807703

Wiesig mag schon stimmen, aber die Flächen müssen noch optimiert werden.
flohoff (2021-02-14 21:58:21+00:00): Moin Holger,
ich hab da gerade in neuen Luftbilder neue Gebäude auf dem Gelände des Bauhofs entdeckt. ich hab da mal was eingezeichnet. Aber das kollidiert jetzt mit allem möglichen anderen. ich glaube das braucht mal Liebe.

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2021-02-15 10:16:02+00:00): Die Luftbilder hab ich noch nicht (in id oder vespucci). Aber hab deinen Gebäuden da mal geglaubt und die Zufahrtsstrasse passend nach Süden verschoben. Ist aktuell wenigstens nicht mehr kaputt.
flohoff (2021-02-15 10:19:22+00:00): 
Ich hab ja immer schon Josm empfohlen :) Frank hatte ja auf der osm-owl Liste vor ein paar Monaten den WMS link für die 2020 Luftbilder des Landes NRW geschickt.
HolgerJeromin (2021-02-15 12:16:55+00:00): Habe 5846 changesets mit JOSM erstellt. :-) 
Aber an fremden Rechnern hat id Vorteile...
noelbov (2020-08-01 13:28:05+00:00): Hello,
It is not correct to add 6 relations (cycle routes 27-28)  and made them all member of network Points-noeuds en Province de Liège. Instead you have to add 1 relation consisting of 6 segments ...
I've corrected those errors for now.
Regards
noelbov