piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JackTW (2015-07-19 18:08:38+00:00): I used BCycles website. but both those entries (bcycle and Copps) were erroneously placed by me.  I know where both are so I must have mistaken some feature as a reference.  I have deleted both today.  Thanks for noticing the bug.
Supaplex (2015-04-12 18:09:13+00:00): 先前我標轉彎限制時，都會加上交叉路口的名字當名稱，讓人在看編輯記錄時能方便知道這是什麼
carciofo (2016-03-03 10:08:10+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. You have drawn roads which overlap on themselves; this is raised as a data quality error as roads should not overlap. Please create individual roads for each segment instead of using the same road to go back and backtrack onto itself. Also, there are no intersection nodes with NW 12th St. There should be a node shared by intersecting roads so that they can be used for routing.
muralito (2015-04-12 16:35:32+00:00): Yanina, la funcion educativa de la escuela se marca con "amenity=school". Sin eso queda solo un edifico pero no apareceria ni en los mapas ni en las busquedas.

Si precisas ayuda, podes pedirla en el foro de Argentina. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49
Nakaner (2015-04-13 09:52:32+00:00): The changeset comment contains a typo. This changeset edited combined, not main signals. The right changeset comment were: "Replace railway:signal:combined=ks by railway:signal:combined=DE-ESO:ks in Niedersachsen, Hamburg, Bremen, Schleswig-Holstein, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Brandenburg and Berlin. Adding new prefix to railway:signal:combined:states=* on Ks main signals. Reparing tagging issues I found while reviewing all signals.
HubMiner (2018-04-05 04:30:19+00:00): Can we clear out the 3 fixme tags?  highway=social_path is not a valid tag (proposal was not accepted).
HubMiner (2018-04-05 04:30:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3452017293/history
malcolmh (2015-04-12 15:09:53+00:00): Are you aware that you are deleting good data? If you did not intend to do this, please revert this.
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:56:07+00:00): please review:
I've changed the rarely used highway=toboggan to
attraction=water_slide
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34953696
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_water_slides
Nakaner (2015-04-13 09:52:05+00:00): The changeset comment contains a typo. This changeset edited combined, not main signals. The right changeset comment were: "Replace railway:signal:combined=ks by railway:signal:combined=DE-ESO:ks in Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt and Thüringen. Adding new prefix to railway:signal:combined:states=* on Ks main signals. Reparing tagging issues I found while reviewing all signals.
Supaplex (2015-04-12 18:06:22+00:00): 結果我們畫一樣的地方XD
我走在那邊時覺得原先的地圖路徑怪怪的orz
晚點來上傳軌跡留個記錄
maraf24 (2015-04-12 17:50:38+00:00): W jakich godzinach apteka jest czynna?
Deanna Earley (2015-09-17 08:19:22+00:00): Is this some "arbitrary hypothetical" sandbox or is this the truth?
pmailkeey (2015-09-17 11:02:48+00:00): It's a genuine OSM sandbox for anyone to use to test either map features or editor features. Did you want to come and play in the sand ?
Deanna Earley (2015-09-17 11:08:50+00:00): But it doesn't physically exist, so should be reverted as per your (now removed) description.
pmailkeey (2015-09-17 11:18:46+00:00): Feel free to remove all things on OSM that doesn't physically exist then feel free to delete this one.
freeExec (2015-09-17 12:00:45+00:00): А ведь я планировал сюда приехать позагорать :(
Deanna Earley (2015-09-17 12:25:56+00:00): PmaiIkeey: As per your description of "I want OSM to reflect the truth and not some arbitrary hypothetical map!"? I fully agree, and it's already gone.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-17 13:09:00+00:00): For anyone who's not aware, http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ is a copy of the OSM site with only test data in it that can be used e.g. for testing things out in the editor.  No-one that I'm aware of renders tiles from it, but you could if you wanted to.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-12 23:09:48+00:00): Sugerowałbym przedyskutować na forum skasowanie dopisku "osada" z miejscowości.
Tymczasem przywróciłem tę końcówkę:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3274530298
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=31525894
tkedt (2015-04-13 05:51:38+00:00): OK. Przy okazji porządków z miejscowościami pojawiło się też kilka wątpliwości z mojej strony, więc zbiorę je i przedstawię na forum (zapewne w tym tygodniu).

A co do miejscowości Borki, zapytam tutaj prywatnie (nawiązując do Twojej edycji z 23.12.14): dlaczego to ma być osada? Wg TERYTU i wikipedii jest wsią. 

Z Ławkami to co innego, bo są osadą i w dodatku obok jest wieś Ławki.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-13 10:57:52+00:00): Hmmm, wydawało mi się, że z Borkami jest tak samo jak z Ławkami. Jednak przyjrzałem się teraz temu i za grzyba nie wiem, czemu ja tam wymyśliłem osadę. Poprawię w takim razie nazwę i dzięki za wnikliwość :-)
maraf24 (2015-04-12 17:31:38+00:00): Sklep/biuro? Czy po prostu miejsce zarejestrowanej DG?
maraf24 (2015-04-12 17:26:21+00:00): To jest dom mieszkalny, gdzie tam jest pranie tapicerki?
Govanus (2015-05-18 19:22:37+00:00): Hello TheKnightWho, I've been looking at your continuation of the C107 in this changeset and wondered if you had seen a sign about it?
I ask as the initial infomation I've found out about it only relates to it being numbered only within the Reading Borough hence I thought it was stopping at the border. There is a logic if it is being sign to continue it in oxfordshire but that isn't a common thing as the numbering for C,D,E,F,U (or in Gloss road classes 3-6 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090208223826/http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=3731]) is locally arranged internally for maintinace and other purposes like : [http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/committe.nsf/0/84afe92892deed4480256bbf0048230b/$FILE/ww1%20Highway%20Maintenance%20Plan%202002%2003.pdm.pdf]. if you have seen signs or no that it extends further I'd be intreasted to know.  The records on reading most cited are the following [http://www.cbrd.co.uk/c-roads/img/reading.jpg] & [http://www.cbrd.co.uk/c-roads/reading.pdf]
mstock (2015-04-20 19:30:32+00:00): Ich weiss noch nicht, was ich von einem `name`-Tag bei Hydranten halten soll - einerseits koennte man den in diesem Changeset vergebenen Wert aus den anderen Tags automatisch eindeutig herleiten, andererseits sehe ich den Nutzen noch nicht. Da ich selbst auch schon ein paar Hydranten erfasst habe (vermutlich sind einige, die seit diesem Changeset ein `name`-Tag haben, urspruenglich von mir, inklusive den mittlerweile wohl eher veralteten `amenity=fire_hydrant`-Tags ;)), wuerde mich der Grund, wieso du `name`-Tags hinzufuegst, schon noch interessieren.
Mazezito (2015-04-12 20:36:46+00:00): Excelente trabalho...
ViriatoLusitano (2015-04-12 22:11:01+00:00): Obrigado! Estava com receio de editar já que esta é uma das áreas onde editas bastante.
surveyor54 (2015-04-18 16:16:34+00:00): Hallo Armand van Helden,
bitte zur Hausnummer auch den tag "addr:street" hinzufügen, denn man weiß sonst nicht, zu welcher Straße die Hausnummer gehört.
Außerdem wir dies als Fehler in OSMI angezeigt.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=9.29629&lat=50.25937&zoom=16&opacity=0.68&overlays=no_addr_street
Kaziu Kisiel (2015-04-12 17:09:34+00:00): This is not M3, but M2.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-12 17:08:34+00:00): ale to rondo takie malutkie? na innych mapach jest większe...
maraf24 (2015-04-12 17:21:09+00:00): Zobaczymy co autor na to odpowie w uwadze.
trigpoint (2015-04-13 19:42:18+00:00): Hi, a small thing. You do need to connect paths to the roads. As you have mapped a cyclist on the cycleway cannot reach New Road.
Hjart (2015-04-13 05:29:46+00:00): På Præsteskoven i Åbenrå har du anbragt 2 stk Netto lige ved siden af hinanden. Kan det passe?
Gumeg (2017-05-02 08:44:04+00:00): Добрый день. Просьба такую информацию, как "Временно не действует!" вносить или в ключ note= или использовать префиксы, в данном случае скорее всгео подходит disused:highway=bus_stop
Jojo4u (2015-04-12 23:46:59+00:00): Hallo Eckart, besser du verwendest für solche Fragen eine Notiz auf osm.org. Ich z.B. lese nicht alle Changesets der Stadt, aber alle Notizen.
Daher: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/346675

LG Joachim
frosm (2019-07-04 17:20:47+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3452309323
quand le type de magasin n'est pas connu, c'est shop=yes tout simplement :)
avez vous plus d'info sur cette entreprise ? par exemple son site web ? cela permettrait de rechercher une valeur + adaptée.
son nom me parait aussi bien long, la moitié ne serrait-elle pas une description de son activité ?
wille (2015-04-12 18:28:30+00:00): o source do changeset na verdade é Bing; Survey
d1g (2015-06-25 03:23:25+00:00): Исправил: здесь была ошибка что этот шлагбаум не часть линии дороги, поэтому машины всё равно проводило: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=51.55369%2C46.03212%3B51.55469%2C46.03011#map=19/51.55420/46.03112
Skippern (2015-04-12 19:12:27+00:00): Favor compartilhe do onde voce conseguir os fontes do que voce crescendo, as imagens Bing não tem resolução para dar detalhas no local e voce não dar referencia do outros fontes.
toninho1001 (2015-04-13 23:17:44+00:00): Na verdade as imagens Bing não dá pra ver. O que estou fazendo é apenas com meu conhecimento da cidade pois moro aqui em Muniz Freire e conheço cada canto, e o nome das ruas uso as placas nas próprias ruas.
mweper (2015-04-12 23:16:02+00:00): Por favor, antes de mapear infórmate de como hacerlo correctamente.

Aunque no quieras ayuda, te lo voy a decir igual. Ya que según Wikipedia, el Liquidambar es una especie de árbol o planta y supongo que es eso lo que quisiste mapear, la etiqueta que más corresponde es natural=tree (Árbol) y no leisure=park (Parque) que se usa para áreas de plazas.

Por favor, cámbialo o lo haré yo.

Más info:
* https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquidambar
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree
eggie (2020-02-22 14:08:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit en geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
aceman444 (2015-04-13 17:57:27+00:00): Dobry den, prosim zadavajte pri odosielani sady zmien komentar, aby bolo vsetkym jasne, co zhruba zmena robi. Dakujem.
PlaneMad (2015-04-13 08:10:18+00:00): Hi Akshara, welcome to OSM!

Noticed that you have drawn a duplicate of Uloor Akkulam Road. You can fix it by deleting the one you dont need. Let me know if you need any help.
Cheers,
akshara (2015-04-13 09:15:14+00:00): That was a mistake i l delette
PlaneMad (2015-04-15 13:30:47+00:00): Awesome, thanks!
woodpeck (2015-05-12 05:47:17+00:00): Dear user drakopineda, please explain what leads you to assume that there is indeed a lake where you drew "Holoi Lake". Please understand that OpenStreetMap is a shared database of facts, and has no place for fiction.
ruthmaben (2015-05-25 06:25:45+00:00):  "Holoi Lake" doesn't appear to exist. Can you please clarify.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-25 16:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31450935 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by user drakopineda since some are clearly fictional e.g. changeset 30174273, casting doubt on the veracity of the rest, and no answer was received about it from the user.
Glassman (2017-04-02 16:16:01+00:00): Is the Jane Addams K-8 School complete now and renamed HAZEL WOLF K-8 PINEHURST?
sctrojan79 (2017-04-03 01:18:45+00:00): Not 100% sure – according to SPS students moved into the new site this Fall (https://bex.seattleschools.org/bex-iv/pinehurst-school/construction-updates/), but it's not clear if the name was changed or not.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-25 16:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31450935 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by user drakopineda since some are clearly fictional e.g. changeset 30174273, casting doubt on the veracity of the rest, and no answer was received about it from the user.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-25 16:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31450935 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by user drakopineda since some are clearly fictional e.g. changeset 30174273, casting doubt on the veracity of the rest, and no answer was received about it from the user.
rickmastfan67 (2015-04-23 02:21:31+00:00): sutton47, we don't add 'names' to houses that don't have real names.  Thus, I've removed the 'name=housing' tags on all the houses you've added it to.
Larry0ua (2015-04-15 16:11:15+00:00): между Македоновкой и Асланово на север от Мариуполя была разорвана tertiary - если там теперь нет дороги или проезда, предлагаю tertiary до Асланово понизить до unclassified, иначе соединить назад...
uname (2015-04-15 17:05:20+00:00): ошибочно разорвалось - востановил. спасибо что заметили
dchiles (2015-04-15 22:39:41+00:00): Why was the name of Broadway Terrace changed?
dchiles (2015-04-15 23:26:56+00:00): Are there really steps here?
michaelarmstrongii (2015-04-13 02:19:41+00:00): This is not Mother's Ruin, this edit added several businesses to the area around South Street Seaport.
Nolan Crees (2015-04-16 15:34:35+00:00): Planning to revert this change and reimport building footprints under import guidelines. I will have the data for all of Story County except the City of Ames.
marc__marc (2022-07-27 20:34:19+00:00): Hello,
can you please fix the all-upper value of species to species=Quercus robur ?
Thanks,
Marc
dpolovinkin (2023-08-16 20:05:49+00:00): is it automated or something like that? trees near Parcul Izvor look like a lot of tree points bundled together randomly, does it carry any value here?
dpolovinkin (2023-08-16 20:52:00+00:00): maaann, with all respect but it looks horrible, why would you do that? it looks like plague around the city and has zero value, or can someone prove me wrong?
OKANO Takayoshi (2015-04-14 03:21:00+00:00): こんにちは。
この編集で、松屋 周南店のノードが削除され、建物のウェイにタグがコピーされていますが、どういう異図でしょうか。
また、建物の位置が移動していますが、ノードにもチェンジセットにもsourceタグがなく、ウェイのsourceタグは削除ノードのコピーのみですが、何を根拠に移動されたのでしょうか。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3062456532
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302012991
OKANO Takayoshi (2015-08-04 11:15:08+00:00): 見たところ、Bing画像をオフセットせずにトレースしているように見受けられます。基盤地図情報(縮尺レベル2500)トレースの地物を、あえてそのように移動する意図は何でしょうか?
robert (2015-04-20 19:54:19+00:00): Hmm you seem to have managed to break quite a few street name matches between OSM and Ordnance Survey Locator in this and other edits in the past few days. Examples:
http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=155337
(where you seem to have merged two roads with different names into one)
http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=34948
http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=651643
http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=298084 (similar merging problem here?)

Would be great if you could fix these.
simon_84 (2015-04-21 02:41:16+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out I will try to be more careful. I changed the street names back.
pmailkeey (2015-09-14 13:00:13+00:00): You've also managed to remove Ramsden Square and the correct connections to the feeder roads - they are not like you've made them at all
mweper (2015-04-13 14:27:26+00:00): Hola Claudia. Te corregí un poco los datos (building y amenity) para que sea más preciso.

Saludos.
literan (2015-04-13 12:06:59+00:00): ну и зачем здание прямо на дорогу оттащили? если подобные вандальные правки будут продолжаться, буду ставить вопрос о вашей блокировке
EdLoach (2015-04-13 08:44:20+00:00): Hi. I've just reverted your changeset as you accidentally the name of Annett Road to your business name. I think you were probably trying to add it to your building (having found your website http://www.motwaltononthames.co.uk ). If you click on your building you should be able to set your business name above the "Generic Building" box, and switch to the Address tab to add your address details. To add things like your phone number, website and what your business is might need you to switch to advanced mode and find the relevant tags (perhaps by looking at the Map Features page and related pages at http://wiki.osm.org ). Let me know if I can help. Ed
hsimpson (2017-09-21 12:34:58+00:00): Hi,
route=train bezeichnet eine Zuglinie, wie z.B. den RE1. Ich denke mal, du wolltest hier eine route=railway oder route=tracks eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Drailway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dtracks
Viele Grüße!
Trockennasenaffe (2017-09-21 13:35:19+00:00): Gute Frage, das ist schon lange her :D. Ich habe mal versucht, das zu rekonstruieren. Damals kam ich frisch und unwissend von der Wikipedia und wollte wohl nur etwas haben wo ich den Wikipedia-Tag ranklatschen kann um die Strecke im Artikel zu visualisieren. Die genauen regeln für Relationen habe ich damals noch nicht verstanden. Als ich dann dieses Jahr zurück kam hatte ich vergessen, dass die Relation ursprünglich von mir war. Rückwirkend würde ich sagen wahrscheinlich eher route=tracks, wobei Oleftalbahn ja auch für die Linie genutzt wird. Die Relation ist so in jedem Fall falsch bzw unvollständig, aber ich weiß nicht genau wie ich das ausbügeln soll. Eventuell ist sie auch ganz überflüssig, da die Tags auch direkt an die ways können.
Nakaner (2017-09-21 19:33:35+00:00): Hallo Trockennasenaffe,

du kannst die wikipedia=*-Tags auch an die Streckengleise (nur die mit usage=*) taggen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Trockennasenaffe (2017-09-22 12:15:52+00:00): Ja, das ist mir jetzt auch klar. Daher überlege ich, ob es nicht das beste wäre, die Relation einfach zu löschen und das Tag an die Gleise zu machen. Die Oleftalbahn verdient sicherlich auch eine Routenrelation, aber darum kann ich mich momentan nicht kümmern.
hsimpson (2017-09-22 12:25:13+00:00): Am einfachsten wäre es doch, die Relation auf Railway oder Tracks umzustellen und dann mit den entsprechenden Infos zu füttern. Die stehen ja alle in dem Verlinkten Wikipedia-Artikel :) Dürfte ein Aufwand von 2 min sein.
-
Nur ist die Frage, ob man dann die Relation dubliziert, da die Kursbuch- und die VzG-Strecke in dem Fall einen identischen lauf haben dürften...
-
Grüße
Trockennasenaffe (2017-09-22 12:46:54+00:00): Am einfachsten wäre das. Bin nur nicht so ein Freund davon Relationen zu nehmen, wo tags genügt hätten, zumal solche Relationen bisher niemand auswertet.
hsimpson (2017-09-22 13:07:20+00:00): Argument. :)
Skippern (2015-04-13 11:23:09+00:00): Ola, e bem vindo ao projeto, so para te ajudar, o parque deve ser mapeado com leisure=park num area, e não num nó. Eu não conheço o local e não posso corrige-lo porque as imagens Bing não me dar o informação necessário.
tyr_asd (2015-05-04 07:33:16+00:00): Hi. Wieso hast du den Straßennamen "Waager-Biro-Platz" hier entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35771673 ?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-13 10:23:34+00:00): Kolego, popsułeś w jakiś sposób ciągłość granicy administracyjnej: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2881286#map=12/52.2248/15.4358&layers=N
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-13 10:30:26+00:00): Wycofałem Twoje zmiany, proszę nie psuć więcej.
josmougn (2015-12-21 22:03:43+00:00): bonjour, vous avez ajouté une voie de bus Av. Laplace or elle était déjà "taguée" sur la voie par "psv=opposite_lane".
Est-ce que vous savez si il y a une bande cyclable le long de la voie de bus ?
merci,
_Christobal_ (2015-12-21 22:22:20+00:00): Bonjour, à ma connaissance, pas de bande cyclable sur ce tronçon. Mais je pourrai vérifier à l'occasion d'un prochain passage sur ce secteur afin de vous le confirmer.
Bien cordialement.
josmougn (2015-12-21 22:39:22+00:00): Et pour la voie de bus on se retrouve avec une info en double et un peu de bazar au niveau des relations ?
R osm (2015-04-13 15:11:55+00:00): https://prod.ceidg.gov.pl/CEIDG/ceidg.public.ui/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=2e251fed-1441-4419-9140-2ceba3a8012e
R osm (2015-04-13 15:12:48+00:00): http://www.money.pl/rejestr-firm/nip/613-14-67-374/kod-pocztowy/59-800/
Grant Humphries (2015-04-22 04:52:11+00:00): Where in the docs does it say that parallel cables car tracks should be mapped as a single feature?  I don't see anything about that here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway or here: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway%3Dcable_car

The two tracks aren't a loop, each car just goes back and forth on its own track.
Grant Humphries (2015-04-22 05:00:24+00:00): this was other link I meant to include for aerialway docs:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerialway
Brian Reavis (2015-04-22 09:36:47+00:00): Hey Grant. Hmm, maybe we have different interpretations:

- "Just one or *two* large cars. The cable forms a loop, but the *cars* do not loop around, they just move up and down on their own side."
- "Cable cars are aerial tramways that are just one *pair* of big cars that go in alternating directions to each other from A to B" Source: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway%3Dcable_car

Having two distinct ways adds other problems:
- Which nodes get the distinction of being pylons/stations? If both on each side do, that implies there are two pylons and two stations on each end.
- Having two ways implies there's two Portland Aerial Trams. There are two cars, but only a single tramway. 

Examples elsewhere:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/43.58756/-110.82832
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/45.28158/-111.44196

What do you think?
Grant Humphries (2015-04-23 18:17:59+00:00): You make some good points, particularly about the pylon (there is clearly only one pylon), and I can see how the docs imply that the pair should be mapped as a single feature.  

However I disagree that the existence of two aerialway features is problematic in the sense that it would confuse people that there were two distinctly different 'Portland Aerial Tram's (like: 'oh, there are two, which one is the one we've heard about?').  I think you can actually make a legitimate case that there are two.  The two cars operate independently of each other on their own track and the operation of one doesn't impede the operation of the other as far as I know.  Compare this to the case of rail tracks, you have almost always have two tracks running parallel to each other and best practice is map them as separate features.  With respect to understanding that the two are a part of the same system, the relation that existed gave that indication.  

As for the case of duplicate stations the building that houses them on each end is already tagged as such, which seems more accurate to me, so the end nodes don't really need station tags.  And using a single aerialway feature introduces a different problem at the stations (at least at the west station).  At the Marquam Hill station there are three platforms from which you can board the aerial tram, but since you've snapped the single aerialway to the middle platform, that relationship is lost for the other two.

***all*** that being said, you did convince me of your position to some extent, and I don't think either way is a perfect solution.  So I'm fine with leaving it as a single feature, but I wanted to share my logic for splitting it into two distinct ways in the first place.
Brian Reavis (2015-04-23 18:54:29+00:00): It's definite gray area for sure. That all makes sense too. Anyway, I didn't mean to clobber your work! I first saw it and figured [wrongly] it was an oversight. You've been doing some epic work in the Portland Area. Maybe there's someone else who knows the "proper" way on this.
Grant Humphries (2015-04-25 22:58:58+00:00): No problem and thanks for the kind words. Always a pleasure chatting with someone who is trying to make OSM great!
bebone (2015-04-13 11:59:06+00:00): changement bâtiment
pas d'église => chapelle
Hjart (2015-04-15 08:16:35+00:00): Det glæder mig at se dig prøve JOSM. Bemærk at den er noget anderledes at arbejde med end iD og Potlatch og kan tage noget længere at sætte sig ind i. Til gengæld indeholder den funktioner som for en rutineret bruger er ganske uundværlige også til daglig brug.
bebone (2015-04-13 12:00:17+00:00): modif batiment
bebone (2015-04-13 11:57:12+00:00): modif : ajout d'un jardin
Dmitry Grebchenko (2015-04-13 11:52:07+00:00): Кафе, кондитерская, магазин "Волконский"