piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gabro00 (2018-09-21 17:57:31+00:00): *helyi
masojuli (2019-02-19 21:54:02+00:00): Hi, Would you please confirm that there is no way to enter this stretch of Lakewood Drive by car from the East Broadway or the south? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37007997 Are there any exceptions (bikes?) for those turn restrictions? Thank you very much for your help!
keithonearth (2019-02-20 21:05:43+00:00): Thanks for your message. 

I'd forgotten about these turn restrictions. The restrictions had been put in place before I made this edit, but seem to have been some sort of trial of additional traffic calming/diversion on the Lakewood bike route. There had been plastic bollards and signage about turn restrictions. The bollards are definitely gone, and I think the signage is gone too.

While there continues to be lots of other measures in place, this one seems to have been removed.

I've deleted the turn restrictions, and will inspect the intersection next time I am passing by, to see if any restrictions remain.
pangoSE (2018-09-22 10:12:50+00:00): Bra jobbat :)
viloan (2018-09-21 17:58:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pangoSE (2018-09-22 10:10:21+00:00): Hej, välkommen hit.
Kul att se att du förbättrar kartan.
Jag ser att du ritar många byggnader och en del har sneda vinklar. 
Vet du om 
1) att JOSM har bästa verktygen för byggnader "building_tools"-plugin?
2) att iD har en funktion för att räta upp byggnader "s" eller högerklicka.

Vill du rita många byggnader rekommenderar jag varmt att börja med JOSM.
Mvh
Egil
dmgroom_ct (2018-09-26 10:38:57+00:00): Hi
many  of the ways you tagged as area = yes are probably buildings and could be tagged as building = yes
muralito (2018-09-21 19:19:28+00:00): Hola Danilo.

Generalmente los predios y edificios no se pegan a la linea de la calle, porque la linea representa el eje de la calle, y los predios y edificios se mapean lo mas exactos a su contorno.
DaniloZuyev (2018-09-21 19:29:14+00:00): Yo me basé en el Central Park que tiene como limites la calle (supuse que si está así es porque es la manera de hacerlo). No vi ninguna documentación oficial que diga lo contrario, quizas me podes orientar en ese sentido. Gracias.
DaniloZuyev (2018-09-21 19:31:08+00:00): Por otro lado, la etiqueta es "Estadio Liebig's" y no "Cancha Liebig's" por lo que el limite deberia ser todo el predio (respetando lo que tu comentas) y no solo la cancha de juego.
muralito (2018-09-21 22:31:55+00:00): El Cental Park no es un buen ejemplo de mapeo. En general las comunidades mas activas en OSM, como Alemania o Inglaterra, tienen mejores ejemplos de mapeos detallados.

Ademas, por como es el estilo de trabajo de OSM, tipo wiki sin moderacion forzada de las colaboraciones, podes encontrar tanto cosas bien mapeadas como cosas mal mapeadas, porque nadie lo detecto o tuvo tiempo o interes de corregirlo.

Lo de las canchas (en particular de futbol y tenis), se estan mapeando las canchas propiamente dichas, rectangulares, siguiendo las lineas que las demarcan. Y el predio completo se mapea aparte, como leisure=sports_centre o stadium.

Al "Estadio Liebig's" solo lo despegue de las calles, no le cambie etiquetas.
DaniloZuyev (2018-09-22 03:28:42+00:00): Lo que planteas del estilo de trabajo de OSM es verdad, pero eso no implica que no se documente la manera correcta de hacer las contribuciones. Sin ir más lejos hay un tutorial al comenzar a editar, si bien es bastante básico, se definen varias pautas de cómo hacer las ediciones.
La metodología que planteas puede ser la incorrecta ya que no hay ninguna documentación que la respalde. 
Por ahora lo voy a dejar así, hasta que encuentre alguna información que indique el buen camino.
Lo de las etiquetas estoy de acuerdo, lo correcto es como lo indicas. Ya realicé el ajuste necesario.
muralito (2018-09-24 12:44:39+00:00): Lo de mapear el perímetro exacto de los elementos es claro en la documentación de stadium https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=stadium y en la de building https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

A su vez, el modelado de las red vial se hace con polilineas que representan el eje de la calle, y el area completa las calles se modela con otras etiquetas  como podes ver en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area

Resumiendo, lo que te comenté antes está todo documentado y respaldado, capaz que no de la mejor forma ni en forma conjunta para que lo vea alguien que recien empieza, pero esta documentado, porque ni los edificios ni los predios llegan al medio de la calle, entonces no es correcto pegarlos.
DaniloZuyev (2018-09-24 13:48:44+00:00): OK, muchas gracias por toda la documentación y por apuntarme el camino correcto. Con esos nuevos conceptos hay varias cosas a ajustar en Fray Bentos. 
Por suerte todos los espacios verdes que había registrado están con el criterio correcto.
chachafish (2018-09-22 22:30:38+00:00): Howdy :) you have created a line here that is untagged and not attached to the ways around it. Can you add tags describing it as a service road, driveway, or whatever it was you intended? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=627230004#map=19/39.76877/-104.75722
Te-Ika (2018-09-24 14:01:08+00:00): Thank you I addressed it.
chachafish (2018-09-22 23:16:58+00:00): Howdy :) Vantage 7th and Grant is a construction area, that’s why there were no ways here previously. Could you remove the way you created here? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=627232155#map=19/39.72662/-104.98309
UncoolGuyJake (2018-10-01 15:23:50+00:00): All fixed, thank you for letting me know.
chachafish (2018-09-26 12:45:16+00:00): Hello :) At the corner of Quitman Street and West Colfax Avenue, you've created parking aisles through a construction area. These aisles don't exist. Can you remove them and repair the area? Thanks :)
Velocimaptor (2018-09-26 13:28:47+00:00): I was using dated imagery and drew in old parking aisles. I have now removed them. Thank you for pointing this out!
brianboru (2018-09-24 14:51:34+00:00): This is not how this tag is designed to be used.  From the wiki: A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized (e.g. emergency, taxi, delivery, ...). Typically found in shopping areas, town centres, places with tourism attractions and recreation/civic areas, where wide expanses of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk.
Martin Wynne (2018-09-24 15:16:05+00:00): Hi Brian,

You are the one who disrupted my previous mapping by unpicking landuse boundaries from highway centre-lines, leaving an area of no man's land between property boundaries on each side of a road. I don't think it is acceptable to create areas of no landuse, where previously there was something mapped.

Legally the area between the property boundaries is the public highway, accessible on foot. If you can suggest a better landuse for this than pedestrian I will happily use it instead. But note that landuse=highway is deprecated (and doesn't render}.

cheers,

Martin.
brianboru (2018-09-25 08:19:24+00:00): We don't map for the standard render.We map what's there. You're shoehorning  a tag with a totally diiferent useage in order to get a rendered affect. If landuse=highway doesn't get rendered but that's the tag to use then use it.Someone will render it - maybe even you.  If you have to sue something then use landuse=grass.
The legality of the extent of the highway refers to all traffic on the highway not just to one class of traffic and clearly there is vehicle access on these roads and thus it is not a pedestrian only area. Please stop using this tag inappropriately
Martin Wynne (2018-09-25 10:31:38+00:00): Hi Brian,

You said:

 > We map what's there.

I am mapping what's there. There is an area alongside most roads which is public and accessible on foot. It's daft that OSM has no proper means of mapping this. There was a proposal for landuse=highway back in 2013 but inexplicably there were more votes against than for, and voting was suspended, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dhighway

 > We don't map for the standard render.

You may not, but I don't see why I shouldn't. When I started mapping there was no mention of not doing so in the welcome email, nor is there on the current Welcome page, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

The only thing that was impressed on me is that you can't map the actual metalled surface of roads because that is done as a street map overlay at conventional width with no reference to the real width. Except of course that it isn't an overlay for tracks and green lanes which are rendered as single lines so that there is no distinction between the width of a track and a footpath. This also strikes me as daft in OSM -- even on OS Landrangers you can see a width difference between a track and a footpath.

In fact I'm not mapping for the standard render only, I check the appearance in all 4 renders on the OSM front page. Which covers the vast majority of OSM users.

But my main concern is not the rendering but that every square inch of land should have its use specified. Because in the real world there is no land which can't have its use described. I thought my original method of distinguishing between landuse boundaries and property boundaries was a reasonable compromise, taking landuse to the highway centre-line and allowing the road overlay to define the property boundary. I specifically asked about this when I started mapping and was told that either method was acceptable. You were the one who objected to this and created areas of no man's land alongside roads where previously there was none. I'm simply trying to fill those areas back in with something meaningful.

For country areas I will try landuse=grass but clearly that is going to look daft (and is not true) in built-up areas. See for example Stourport High Street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.33940/-2.28000 At zoom level 19 the rendered road overlay is much narrower than the actual street width. The same applies to a great many places (and the square in front of the Manor Arms at Abberley).   

cheers,

Martin.
chachafish (2018-09-22 22:19:23+00:00): Howdy :) you have created a line here that is untagged. Can you add tags describing it as service roads, driveways, or whatever it was you intended? Thanks 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=627246185#map=19/39.70503/-104.76467
Te-Ika (2018-09-24 14:01:56+00:00): Got it, thank you!
chachafish (2018-09-22 23:13:17+00:00): Howdy :) Parq on Speer is a construction area, that’s why there were no ways here previously. Could you remove the ways you created here? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=62802986#map=19/39.73092/-104.99074
chachafish (2018-09-25 02:26:53+00:00): Hello :) Mile High Apartments is a construction area, that’s why there were no ways here previously. Could you remove the ways you created here? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/39.73964/-105.02762
chachafish (2018-09-25 02:32:58+00:00): Also, Colorado Department of Transportation HQ is a new building. The parking aisles you created here do not exist. If you use the latest satellite imagery, you can see the buildings. Can you please remove the parking aisles you created? Thanks :)  https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/39.73858/-105.02362
chachafish (2018-09-26 13:21:46+00:00): Hello :) TriVista on Speer Apartments is a construction area, that’s why there were no ways here previously. Could you remove the ways you created here? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5921349539#map=19/39.73784/-104.99563
Whimsical Otter (2018-10-01 17:09:27+00:00): Hi chachafish,

I went over the areas you mentioned and fixed the data. Thank you for letting me know and I appreciate all the help you have been giving me!

Whimsical Otter
nrvw (2018-09-21 19:08:30+00:00): I apologize; I selected the wrong townland boundaries. This change should be rejected as the selected townland is in fact Ballyveagh More Upper. I will resubmit this correction for the townland to the south, which is being called "Ballyveagh More Upper" though it is actually Ballyveagh More.
Brian@Brea (2018-09-25 03:53:11+00:00): tram line is incorrect as that tag relates to train vehicles, not road vehicles [trailway=tram]. This way has been corrected
samguer (2018-09-25 03:57:42+00:00): Sorry, I miss understood the use of that road attribution, thank you for following up with my edit.
Robert46798 (2018-09-24 11:21:39+00:00): Hallo Dan_Fi,

danke für die Ergänzungen.

Hast du die Möglichkeit vor Ort die Existenz der Gebäude zu prüfen? Ich arbeite mit JOSM und habe da die Möglichkeit andere Luftbilder anzuzeigen. Bei denen fehlen die Gebäude. Jetzt ist es schwierig von der Ferne zu beurteilen, ob sie neu gebaut, oder abgerissen wurden.

Ich vermute zwar, dass sie neu sind, aber es wäre wichtig zu wissen wie es ist. Solltest du nicht selbst die Möglichkeit haben vorbeizugehen, kannst du auch einen fixme-Tag setzen --> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Dan_Fi (2018-09-24 11:37:22+00:00): Hallo Robert,
leider wohne ich nicht dort, sondern habe auch nur den Hinweis eines Kurierfahrers erhalten. 
Fixme hab ich gesetzt.
Danke für deine Hilfe
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-21 19:32:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 19157232, 19173894, 19179334, 19179546.
abakus_uploader (2018-09-21 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
chachafish (2018-09-22 22:33:32+00:00): Howdy :) you have created a line here that is untagged. Can you add tags describing it as a service road, driveway, or whatever it was you intended? Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=627259245#map=20/39.58204/-104.87509
theArchDruid (2018-10-01 17:27:39+00:00): Mr. chachafish, 

I added the correct tags to this untagged way I created, my apologies for the inconvenience and thank you for your help!

Your friend,

the Arch Druid
Baloo Uriza (2018-09-27 02:36:33+00:00): Landuse should be congruent with actual landuse, not crossing roads but closer to a cadastre as much as practical; neighborhoods can be organized as place=neighborhood
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62809487
rene78 (2018-09-22 07:51:33+00:00): Wow, das sieht alles nach verdammt viel Arbeit aus. Danke dafür!
borishag (2018-09-24 07:03:41+00:00): Kruidvat, betaling; er is hier in het verleden in het forum al een uitgebreide discussie over geweest. Het is logisch dat je kan betalen met de gangbare betaalmiddelen in alle winkels. het vermelden hiervan is dus overbodig, en in dit geval onjuist. Want wij accepteren niet alle vormen van cash (geen € 0,01 0,02 100,- 200,- en 500,-) ook accepteren we geen credit cards. Zou je daarom deze wijzigingen ongedaan kunnen maken?
SomeoneElse (2018-09-21 21:43:16+00:00): Why have you deleted Gibraltar https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1278736/history in this changeset?
user_177389 (2018-09-22 04:26:06+00:00): This Relation was damaged by deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345004359
(comment: Ceuta - Gibraltar - La Linea -> Supresión de la imaginaria linea administrativa de las llamadas aguas de Gibraltar. Esa Colonia no tiene jurisdicción reconocida de aguas territoriales propias. Y mientras así sea, no deben dibujarse tales.)
Gibraltar is not a country and so would be the own admin_level=2 not correctly. I have added the outers of Gibraltar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6491134 (timezone), https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3969434 (British Overseas Territories as outer) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1311341 (Spain as inner). This relations were not adjusted.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-23 08:31:05+00:00): Thanks.  The previous changes have been reverted now (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62835339 ).  I'm not convinced that the entire Gib territorial waters should be an "inner" for Spain, but that's something that needs talking about to discuss what the shape of the inner should be.
user_177389 (2018-09-23 09:00:37+00:00): Thank you, I had seen it yesterday evening and corrected a small reverted error in timezone relation.


"I'm not convinced that the entire Gib territorial waters should be an "inner" for Spain..."

...and an "outer" for British Overseas Territories. Yes, my opinion (the land area only was relinquished).
SomeoneElse (2018-09-23 10:45:37+00:00): My recollection is that both Gib and Spain claim the water, and _both_ have at least some control of at least some of it (e.g. the marine park).  I don't think that Spain can claim to have control of Gib harbour, so this might be somewhere that overlapping admin-level 2 relations makes sense.
The discussion is probably best had on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 to be honest - that way any interested parties will have a chance to comment.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2018-10-10 06:39:44+00:00): Lo que recuerdo es que tanto Gib como España reclaman el agua, y tanto tienen al menos algo de control de al menos algo (por ejemplo, el parque marino). No creo que España pueda afirmar que tiene el control de Gib Harbor, por lo que este podría ser un lugar en el que las relaciones de nivel de administración 2 superpuestas tengan sentido.
Probablemente, lo mejor es tener la discusión en https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 para ser honesto, de esa manera, cualquier parte interesada tendrá la oportunidad de comentar.
Atentamente,
Andy
matt_ellery (2018-09-30 21:14:51+00:00): Hi Jake, highway=service doesn't prohibit public access to the estate by itself (that's what access=* tags are for). This road is a dead end only used to access the businesses, so highway=service seems appropriate to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62810109
Jake's Cars (2018-09-30 21:38:31+00:00): service road - noun
a subsidiary road running parallel to a main road and giving access to houses, shops, or businesses.
This road stands alone and being a dead end is not cause to type as service.
Therefore, I disagree with your ruling.
If you wish, driveway would be more appropriate than service road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62810109
matt_ellery (2018-09-30 21:50:49+00:00): Thanks for replying so quickly. The dictionary definition is a little misleading with regards to OSM data and sounds to me like it's describing a frontage road:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road

The commonly accepted definition of a service road in OpenStreetMap can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
kartonage (2018-09-22 05:02:23+00:00): Hallo Bellamiso und willkommen bei OSM! Du hast ein Review angefordert.
//
Danke für den Eintrag. Es hat allerdings eine Kleinigkeit gefehlt. Nämlich das Tag was das Geschäft ist, sonst wäre es nur eine Adresse mit Namen gewesen. Ich habe dies an diesem Punkt ergänzt. Was immer noch ganz nett zu ergänzen ist für Geschäfte sind Öffnungszeiten, Barrierefreiheit, Website oder Telefonnummer. Du kannst ja mal gucken ob du das noch machen möchtest.
//
Falls du Fragen hast, gern nachhaken. Ansonsten happy mapping!
skquinn (2019-05-20 15:17:09+00:00): "minor changes" is not a very helpful changeset comment. Please consider more descriptive comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mueschel (2018-09-26 10:45:52+00:00): Could you please check this waterway and adjacent ones? They got some strange tags
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320342100
Debrecen = -
Nagyhegyes = 180921
zsolt d (2018-09-26 20:26:25+00:00): Thanks! Now I have corrected it.
itineris (2020-01-30 10:10:59+00:00): Ezek a koncentrikus körök Nagyhegyesnél ugye nem gyalogutak, hanem egy körforgó öntözőrendszer keréknyomai?
zsolt d (2020-02-10 10:25:26+00:00): Így van. Ezek nem mezőgazdasági utak a szó hagyományos értelmében, amin autóval, terepjáróval, traktorral szoktak közlekedni. Keréknyomok, egy-nyomtávú berendezéstől. Gyalog járható ösvények (nem gyalogútnak, hanem ösvénynek jelöltem), talán ehhez áll legközelebb. A keréknyomok maguk gyalog körbejárható ösvények. A tájban járva maguk az öntöző berendezések szerkezetei látható nagy objektumok. Nem tudom, ennek mi lehet a legjobb térképi jelölése.
freebeer (2018-09-27 09:31:28+00:00): Moin moin,
I'm sure you know this, but a Real new mapper can be identified by iD listing how much of the tutorial or whatever that user completed before leaping into the edit.
when like here the user with only one changeset does not list any introduction, then most likely we are dealing with a new account created by a more experienced mapper.  particularly when like here the telltale tags and spelling of Hours and Payments are used.
Not that what you are doing is wrong, and it is better you do this than leave things to some grizzled embittered mapper who will delete the malformed data, or Tags, or Keywords, or spammy description, when I can't be arsed to clean up after SEO spammers and lump them all into one category.
Which is why it's best to keep me away from any editor and pray my equipment doesn't improve, what with the ceiling collapsing onto my workbench last week and leaving that computer under some 10cm of highly flammable woodwormy rubbish and saucer-sized stones.
So, keep the faith.
Cheers!
b-jazz (2018-09-27 16:31:51+00:00): Thanks. I needed a good laugh today.
BCNorwich (2018-09-22 06:31:06+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like you have inadvertently duplicated the Galleywood Common area. If you wish I can revert the changes for you but not till later today. 

The whole common area needs to be amended anyway as the common as mapped includes areas not part of the common. I'll look into this.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-09-22 08:16:52+00:00): Hi, I think it's best to revert before I make other changes. This changeset is now reverted.