piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-10-19 16:05:08+00:00): Die paden heb ik alleen gesplitst en alle zijden gecombineerd tot één rechthoek. Daar zit dus de area=yes tag op. 
Zo zou je ook zo'n vlak om de speeltoestellen kunnen maken. Dan dus zorgen voor een gesloten vlak. Daar kan dan naast highway=footway de tag area=yes bij en surface=paving_stones op. 
Dan wordt het lastiger, want dan moeten die playground vlakken in een multipolygoonrelatie worden opgenomen als inner. We leuk om onder de knie te krijgen. Het grote vlak is de outer. Anders zie je op afgeleide kaarten geen speelplaatsjes meer.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:08:06+00:00): Zo rendert het .. Het Vrieseplein
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.81206/4.67153
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:09:31+00:00): Het is nu in ieder geval een mooie verbetering (accurater) van hoe het een week terug was, toch? Wat je nu zegt klinkt mij echt veel te ingewikkeld, ik heb geen idee hoe dat moet haha
eggie (2018-10-19 16:11:19+00:00): Ook niet geweldig zie ik op afgeleide kaarten als de Openfietsmap.'
'k Zal er highway=pedestrian van maken. het is immers een voetgangersgebied. Dan rendert het afgeleide kaarten ook grijs zoals op het Energieplein. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.81527/4.68151
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:13:13+00:00): Van dat middelste vlak toch? Die looppaden liggen los van de vlakken, niet erop.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:13:27+00:00): Nu aangepast met highway=pedestrian op het voetgangersvlak.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63683455
eggie (2018-10-19 16:15:19+00:00): Die looppaden zijn toch gewoon verbonden met dat vlak. Zijn die niet een onderdeel daarvan?
eggie (2018-10-19 16:17:43+00:00): Het routeert hier gewoon langs de buitenkant als zijnde paden. 
Ik draai even mijn changesets terug dan kun je zelf aan de slag.
Even niet mappen.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:20:25+00:00): Zoals ik het eerst had gedaan, was de bedoeling. Looppaden verlengd rond het gebied en erin een vlak bestaande uit bakstenen. Zoals jij het deed is goed, maar die looppaden horen er niet IN maar omheen.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:21:17+00:00): Ik heb net m'n eigen changesets teruggedraaid .. dus je kunt het nu op je eigen manier doen. Dat kan ook gewoon highway=pedestrian toevoegen aan de binnenste rechthoek. Het zal alleen niet routeren, want het heeft geen verbinding met de rest.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:21:42+00:00): Het is heel lastig uit te leggen in woorden, je zou het begrijpen als je op die plek was. Maar ik snap dat dat niet realistisch is.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:25:46+00:00): Overigens denk ik niet dat het paden zijn.. het is gewoon een vlak.. Even andersom denken. :)
Je vervolgt je weg langs het vlak toch?
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:26:14+00:00): Ik heb het nu gedaan zoals ik vind dat het het best overeen komt. Maar ik snap dat ik nog een beginner ben en jij veel ervaring hebt, dus als jij vindt dat het beter op een andere manier kan, dan aanvaard ik dat.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 16:26:37+00:00): ''Overigens denk ik niet dat het paden zijn.. het is gewoon een vlak.. Even andersom denken. :) 
Je vervolgt je weg langs het vlak toch?''

Dit klopt inderdaad.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:28:08+00:00): Dan zou je dus gewoon simpel highway=pedestrian erbij kunnen taggen op dat vlak. Dan rendert het. 
Overigens heb ik even gespiekt op "straatkijk".
Maar up to you.. Je bent goed bezig zo.
eggie (2018-10-19 16:41:53+00:00): Er wordt niet van je verwacht dat je alles in één keer onder de knie hebt. Wanneer iets echt fout zoals met die routerelaties krijg je wel een seintje. 
Mijn edits zijn trouwens ongedaan gemaakt. Het is weer zoals jouw laatste changeset.
Cyclono (2018-10-19 17:36:03+00:00): hi ik wil niet te storen met jullie gesprek, maar ik zie dat erik super veel mapt nu in rotterdam. Super goed!
eggie (2018-10-19 19:07:26+00:00): Hier zie je wie nog meer mapt in je buurt. Daar zal lokale mapper Jimiiee ook ergens tussen staan.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=51.93432895&lon=4.48823555&layers=B0T
freebeer (2018-10-26 00:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63884869 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
freebeer (2018-10-26 00:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63884972 where the changeset comment is: revert #hotosm-project-4450 vandalism, neither this nor the white house is a mosque.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:33:38+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
freebeer (2018-10-26 00:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63884748 where the changeset comment is: this is no place of worship
viloan (2018-10-19 14:41:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dval (2019-08-20 07:40:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, Георгий! Вы добавали natural=peak на геодезический знак. Такие геод. знаки устанавливаются не только (и не всегда) на вершину горы. Их устанавливают часто в местах, где их даже можно и не заметить: возле школы, в лесу на просеке или лесной дороге и проч.
Filohipo (2018-10-19 18:07:19+00:00): Hi
Please be carefull in editing Castro Marim area. Unless you have localy and quite recent collected data, do not change what have been done.
For instance you are classifiing as saltern true salt water reservoirs that feed the real saltern. In the area there are a lot of reservoir and saltern that are now fishfarms (aquaculture). So, do not trust in outdated satelital photos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-19 15:12:17+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-19 15:12:30+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-19 15:12:33+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-19 15:12:36+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-19 15:12:39+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked
philippec (2020-05-20 16:44:17+00:00): Dat zal wel een spelfout zijn, ik verbeter het.
clay_c (2018-10-23 22:18:40+00:00): Outline looks nice - good square corners. The tagging looks good and complete, though it looks like you've accidentally tagged it as a school building. Could you change this? Just `building=yes` should work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63681840
clay_c (2018-10-23 22:18:41+00:00): Outline looks nice - good square corners. The tagging looks good and complete, though it looks like you've accidentally tagged it as a school building. Could you change this? Just `building=yes` should work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63681840
clay_c (2018-10-23 22:46:08+00:00): Tagging looks good and complete! Don't forget to square the corners of your building outlines (you can find this by right-clicking on a building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63681954
clay_c (2018-10-23 21:53:42+00:00): Tagging looks great! Though I think now there are two outlines for school grounds on top of each other. Could you consolidate them and draw the building outlines?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682010
clay_c (2018-10-24 18:40:15+00:00): Hi! I don't think you meant to remove all the tags from this segment of the river. I went ahead and undid that for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682016
clay_c (2018-10-24 21:08:55+00:00): This is copied from Google. Not okay.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682047
iandees (2018-10-24 22:22:09+00:00): What makes you think it's copied from Google, clay_c?
clay_c (2018-10-24 22:59:29+00:00): For some context, Neveli0us is mapping buildings with their classmates as part of the Great AGS-TeachOSM County Mapping Challenge. I volunteered to monitor their edits and give feedback. When I came upon this changeset, I found that Neveli0us had given buildings some head-scratching descriptions ("Building is hidden completely under trees and looks abandoned, somehow its a business." and "A weird church...could possibly be a secret cult?" among others). Originally, I thought it was just vandalism. It made no sense to me. Did Neveli0us totally make up these buildings? So I investigated a little. All the buildings in this changeset happened to match up with businesses that show up on Google Maps. Every bit of information was lifted from there and put into either the nearest building he could draw or, in some cases, a building he invented out of thin air.
clay_c (2018-10-24 00:42:15+00:00): Good building outlines! The squared corners look nice. A lot of the buildings seem to be missing tags completely - don't forget you'll need to fill in the tags to get full points.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682116
clay_c (2018-10-23 22:29:05+00:00): Tagging looks almost complete! A library building should be tagged as `building=yes` and `amenity=library`. The building outline seems to only be covering part of the building - could you extend it so that it covers the parts to the east as well?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682222
clay_c (2018-10-24 22:23:38+00:00): Good building outlines. Whenever there's a partially-tagged point for the building you want to draw, copy all its tags over to the building outline and get rid of the point. Don't forget to square the corners of buildings (you can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682276
zeltwelt (2018-11-25 23:23:35+00:00): Why is this rendered so weird (light green)?
sejohnson (2018-11-09 18:58:36+00:00): Your tracing looks pretty good, but you need to take the final step of tagging them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682367
clay_c (2018-10-24 17:21:00+00:00): Tagging looks good and complete! Don't forget to square the corners of your building outline (you can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682382
clay_c (2018-10-24 17:35:13+00:00): Tagging looks good and complete. Could you add more detail to the building outline and make sure it follows the exterior walls? Don't forget to square the corners of your outline (you can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682385
clay_c (2018-10-24 20:19:43+00:00): Tagging looks great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63682392
BCNorwich (2018-11-02 19:55:26+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know that parts of the way you've recently added are in fact duplicating an existing way (Way: Sett Valley Trail (636039419)). It's best in cases like this to amend the existing way thus keeping all history of changes.

Regards Bernard.
DaveD (2018-11-02 20:01:44+00:00): Hi Bernard - whereabouts do you mean? If you mean near St Georges Road in New Mills at the western end, there was already some confusion about the line of the Sett Valley Trail but I think my line is correct. I plan to visit to check whether the previously shown line exists (I don't think there are duplicates on the ground).
BCNorwich (2018-11-02 20:34:50+00:00): Hello DaveD, this is the OSM Inspector (routing layer) link that drew my attention to the problem, http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.98793&lat=53.37353&zoom=16&overlays=duplicate_ways

Regards Bernard
DaveD (2018-11-02 20:48:06+00:00): Thanks again. I can see the problem, but I don't know how to fix it. Any advice?
BCNorwich (2018-11-03 06:58:38+00:00): Hi, It's a little bit tricky, I'll look at it again later on today, Saturday, and comment again here. Regards.
BCNorwich (2018-11-03 10:07:52+00:00): Hi, looks OK now if you'd like to check please? I changed some PRoW refs bridleways are usually marked BR, I don't know why DCC mark them as BW, (BW is for a ByWay).
Regards Bernard
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:33:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:31:43+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Happy Mapping!
DaveF (2019-01-03 00:11:43+00:00): Hi
Are you aware you've added the Peak District National Park relation to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636044642/history
 & other ways such as path Hayfield BW 5?

This makes a mess of the relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2176657#map=17/53.36881/-1.94377

Your edits may need reversing ot sort it out.
DaveD (2019-01-03 17:31:46+00:00): No, I wasn't aware and it wasn't deliberate. How do I undo the damage?
DaveF (2019-01-03 22:12:57+00:00): Hi
Leave it with me. There's been a couple of other edits after yours that require attention.

TBH It's not really your fault. iD isn't great at visually displaying relations. To keep a check, scroll the 'Edit Feature' side bar down to the bottom to double check.
DaveF (2019-01-04 11:58:45+00:00): I'm about to make the amendments: What is the correct prow_ref for this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636044642#map=16/53.3660/-1.9385

FYI the prow_ref should be added to the 'name' tag
DaveF (2019-01-04 11:59:08+00:00): * shouldn't be added...
DaveD (2019-01-04 12:10:41+00:00): Hi Dave and thanks. The correct PROW ref is Hayfield BW 8. Regarding the name, I was following a precedent I came across in another parish (and I think there is an argument to be made that, in the absence of any other name, the prow_ref IS the name of the way). However, others have said the same as you so as a newbie I've accepted the convention and am no longer adding the prow_ref to the name.
muralito (2018-10-26 17:14:23+00:00): Hi Christopher.

Are you sure this two elements are pharmacies?
InsertUser (2018-10-19 20:31:26+00:00): Are you sure this is a street? It looks more like a path.
mumblin (2018-10-19 21:14:18+00:00): I made the correction. Thank you!
maraf24 (2018-10-19 20:19:22+00:00): Źródło zmiany?
highflyer74 (2018-10-23 11:49:26+00:00): Moin mal wieder :-)

Danke für das Hinzufügen der Website etc. Leider sind die Informationen so nicht nutzbar. Achte immer genau darauf, auf welchem Objekt etwas liegt. Die Feuerwehr als POI ist am Gelände gemappt. Das ist diese https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328541061 Fläche. Dann muss dort auch die Website hinzugefügt werden, da diese Information sich ja auf die Feuerwehr als solches bezieht. Da wir alles nur einmal erfassen, habe ich die Informationen jetzt vom Gebäude an das Gelände geändert.

Ich hatte Dir hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53104354 schon einmal ein paar nützliche Links geschickt, damit Du verstehst, wie OSM funktioniert. Lies sie Dir am besten einmal durch.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
viloan (2018-10-19 16:58:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:30:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
berms (2018-11-28 23:57:04+00:00): Hi mikkolukas, I noticed you added a construction tag on way 301270578 based on your observation, and was wondering if you could confirm if the segment has reopened?
mikkolukas (2018-11-29 00:33:42+00:00): I can take a look sometime next week, as I live nearby
berms (2018-11-29 01:24:00+00:00): Great, look forward to hearing from you. Thanks!
bha_rath (2018-12-15 07:59:11+00:00): Hi,
While working on one of Malaysian City(Melaka), Came across your edits where service road is marked as unclassified.
Is there any particular reason to mark as unclassified, If not can I go ahead and make necessary changes.

Example:
way 636067885
way 636067887
way 636067891
way 636067892
way 636067895
way 637242676
RunRunShow (2018-12-15 10:34:51+00:00): Hi bha_rath,

I see that you have confused minor/unclassified road as being lower ranked than residential road when in fact it is one rank higher than residential in the osm highway hierarchy. The label "unclassifed" is simply an artifact/legacy from UK road classification (which OSM movement originated). It simply means neither of the top five classification from motorway to tertiary. See OSM wiki for explanation.

I used minor/unclassified roadway for shop fronting roads to differentiate from house fronting residential roads.

Please pass this info to your other Grab friends as well as I cannot reply each and everyone of similar comments sent to me.
freebeer (2018-11-15 12:06:07+00:00): please do not use the osm production database for testing, as the whole world now has an unintelligible craft node in revision 30 on the map at this point.

while this sort of testing may superficially seem harmless, there are appropriate development sandboxes provided by osm where this data will not be distributed to the world, but more importantly, where you can do extensive, even destructive testing without worry, which should have helped you to catch the serious bug that continues to manifest itself in adding inappropriate data worldwide which have no connection whatsoever to the items you intend to be updating.

thanks.
kozlorf (2019-02-05 11:35:39+00:00): Hej,
Przed Wyszkowem ten szlak idzie przez miejscowość Kółko i robi taką śmieszną pętelkę do jakiegoś pomnika nad samym Bugiem; sprawdzone osobiście (są oznaczenia), tak też to pokazują okoliczne mapy. Kiedyś to tu naniosłem, teraz widzę, że zniknęło. Choć po prawdzie tam się jedzie ciężko, więc w/g mnie ten szlak w rzeczywistości powinien sobie tę pętelkę odpuszczać i iść tak, jak teraz, albo w ogóle do końca przez Skuszew.
Niemniej prawdopodobnie mapa powinna jednak odzwierciedlać rzeczywiste oznaczenia; rowerzysta, jak będzie chciał, to sobie pętelkę odpuści.
user_717069 (2019-02-06 18:08:46+00:00): Cześć,
Zgadzam się, że mapa powinna odzwierciedlać rzeczywisty przebieg w terenie. Starałem się możliwie rzetelnie weryfikować przebieg szlaku, jednak w niektórych przypadkach nie było to możliwe z dostępnych mi źródeł. Już wprowadziłem poprawkę i mam nadzieję, że teraz wszystko się zgadza.
kozlorf (2019-02-08 08:36:56+00:00): Tak, teraz zdaje się to być, jak na oznaczeniach.
W lato się tam przejadę i to zweryfikuję ;)
Dzięki
kozlorf (2019-02-08 08:43:10+00:00): O znalazłem jeszcze mapę, która wydaje się być taka sama, jak mapy terenowe, które są w okolicy:
http://www.turystyka.wyszkow.pl/pliki/mapa///mapa_gminy_2.jpg
Ja planuję w lato pojeździć w tamtej okolicy i ponanosić pozostałe szlaki (mam działkę w Młynarzach nad Bugiem) - część zrobiłem 2 lata temu, w zeszłym roku jakoś nie było okazji ;)
bxl-forever (2018-12-13 15:46:32+00:00): Indeed, it does not show up on the most recent aerial imagery (UrbIS 2018).  I remove the way altogether.
(Also, please do not use the "name" field to add comments about this object → this is what the changeset summary is made for.)
treestryder (2018-10-19 21:07:07+00:00): I would love to see what remains of that old railway bed turned into a Rails-to-Trails trail.