piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:44:48+00:00): Ну если вы представляете какую-то организацию, то тогда вам следует следовать руководству https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Если есть сложности с оригиналом документа, то вот его перевод на русский язык:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Howpper (2019-09-08 20:22:43+00:00): (21st and Bernard).
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-08 22:23:33+00:00): hello, what's the source of this edit?
TM2404 (2019-09-09 08:15:22+00:00): yesterday I was at this place and I want to walk this way. But there is no path. It's a dead end. Really no way to pass the bushes.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-09 12:46:58+00:00): that is weird. Strava heatmap does display it https://www.strava.com/heatmap#13.88/-16.86590/32.76541/hot/all are you sure you didn't mislead the location? i have done this hike myself several times heading north from the path near the bridge of Ribeiro Frio
TM2404 (2019-09-09 19:54:49+00:00): Yes, I am very sure. I could not find the top end of the path and I also could not find the lower end. I spent a lot of time in the bushes to find the way down the hill, but there is no. I had to go back.
I hope this is the end of discussion.
Wanderwütiger (2019-09-09 19:25:05+00:00): Hallo Mathbau! In https://www.osm.org/changeset/71734845 wird gerade über Probleme mit der Drauradweg-Relation diskutiert. Dort habe ich dich erwähnt, da du an der Wiederherstellung der Relation arbeitest.
Liebe Grüße, Wanderwütiger
PPete2 (2019-09-13 08:44:48+00:00): Hi Mathbau, Vielleicht möchtest du auch im Forum 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67327 

mitdiskutieren, wo es ums Reparieren eures Edits des Drauradwegs geht. Das geht dort übersichtlicher als hier im Changeset.
!bm (2019-09-08 21:22:07+00:00): Hello OnHour! Your goals might be noble (that's not to judge here), but please note that OpenStreetMap is NOT a database for (any one-time) events such as protests etc. OSM is for stuff that exists permanently (on the ground). Please refrain from any further edits in OSM to manifest your activism – again: even if it is for the utmost urgent and noble cause. Thanks for your understanding and best of luck for your endeavour!
best regards !bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74236324
A67-A67 (2019-09-09 21:48:41+00:00): Deze wegen zijn nog niet in aanleg, maar gepland. De tags highway=proposed en proposed=unclassified waren dus correct. Ik heb het hersteld.
Martin Borsje (2019-09-10 04:28:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2019-09-11 18:09:33+00:00): Dank je. Ziet er goed uit!
user_9828679 (2019-09-15 15:51:04+00:00): Схоже я нічого не розумію в картографії, на жаль. І така абстрактна картографія мені не зрозуміла.
UPegasus (2019-09-16 16:57:52+00:00): Принаймні, після мене можна легко змінювати і доповнювати мапу.
І ще - я не плутаю дорожню мережу, рослинність і гідрографію між собою та з адміністративними межами.
PLima785 (2019-09-09 23:24:18+00:00): Hi there,, did i do something wrong?
If it helps this is the same owner, but one building is dedicated to the restaurant and the point is the place for snacks and coffee
freebeer (2019-09-10 02:24:45+00:00): if you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416926725/history and compare the number of nodes making up the outline, it appears to have more than doubled in your last edit.

but in reality if you follow the node numbers, you will see some being repeated, often several times, as you make three loops around the building outline.

i don't know if you did anything to cause this, or whether it might be an osmand bug particularly obvious here.

i refer to my such corrections as some variant of dupe nodes, which maybe andre should consider to make it clear this is a simple geometry repair, and nothing to do with the map data, as i have seen another similar comment a day ago.
Andre68 (2019-09-10 04:39:48+00:00): These loops or dupe nodes are nearly always due to a faulty editor tool. So no, you didn't do anything wrong. Likely...
PLima785 (2019-09-10 22:41:23+00:00): ok i understand and i will send this to the OsmAnd, thank you
A67-A67 (2019-09-08 22:45:27+00:00): Hallo Pptje,
Bedankt voor het toevoegen van de naam Nassaupark. Helaas is er wel iets fout gegaan. Je hebt hier de grasvelden in het park in vijf losse parken veranderd. De correcte manier is een vlak te tekenen, dat het gehele park bevat, en dat de tags leisure=park, name=Nassaupark te geven.

Ik heb dit vlak toegevoegd en de grasvelden hersteld.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-10-25 04:59:37+00:00): I would certainly disagree with this being trunk. The established convention is that trunk (in Canada) would be a non-freeway that is part of the National Highway System, and for the Winnipeg area, they would be Provincial Trunk Highways 1, 75, 100, and 101.
eggie (2019-09-13 21:07:38+00:00): Beste Pptje .. Zou je zo vriendelijk willen zijn om commentaar toe te voegen bij je changeset zodat andere lokale mappers begrijpen wat je hebt gedaan?

MVG,
eggie
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:05:45+00:00): Hi, the area described by Way: Cockfield Hall (432384750) is definitely not a building it is better described as a residential area. I have amended your tags.
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:08:38+00:00): Way: 390998599 is not a building it's a recreation ground part of the school, I've amended your tags.
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:11:29+00:00): Is there a bridge where Way: 535590323 crosses the stream?
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:17:51+00:00): I un-joined Way: Grove Park (722997020) from the center line of High Street.
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:21:32+00:00): I remove amenity=parking from the node of the car park area, no need for duplication.
BCNorwich (2019-09-09 07:33:32+00:00): Separated pond from path center line.
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:16:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. What is the source of the name you added here? Is this really the official name of this park? Thanks :)
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:33:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=retail. Please use building=commerical.
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:21:46+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. What is the source of the name you added here? Is this really the official name of this park? Thanks :)
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:35:42+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you named eight sections of grass, “Pearl Street Mall Courthouse”. Do you have a source for naming the grass? Please keep in mind that in OSM we use the, “On the ground rule”. Thanks :)
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:37:18+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you named a section of grass, “Athens South”. Do you have a source for naming the grass? Please keep in mind that in OSM we use the, “On the ground rule”. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:40:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you named three sections of grass, “Regent and Broadway”. Do you have a source for naming the grass? Please keep in mind that in OSM we use the, “On the ground rule”. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
chachafish (2019-09-09 12:43:20+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you named five sections of grass, “ECCR East Random Field”. Do you have a source for naming the grass? Please keep in mind that in OSM we use the, “On the ground rule”. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:34:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node to main building!
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:39:50+00:00): Please check the relations 10012559, 10012560, 10012561,10012562, 10012563.
Please also check the three points 6781574953, 6781574963, 6781574964, as they are on exactly the same position, this can cause routing problems.
Jose Luis Infante (2019-09-08 23:54:52+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tus contribuciones.
Como veo que no llevas mucho tiempo colaborando, te explico lo que son las relaciones.
En OSM hay tres tipos de elementos, los nodos, es decir, puntos, las vías, es decir, líneas (que pueden ser abiertas o cerradas), y las relaciones.
Las relaciones son básicamente un conjunto de elementos.
Por ejemplo, un edificio compuesto de varias partes, un límite de una ciudad, o una ruta de transporte.
Una vez explicado esto, lamentablemente tengo que revertir los cambios que has realizado en esta edición, ya que has modificado sin querer varias rutas transporte al unificar todos los tramos de la rotonda en uno solo.
Es comprensible que sin conocer el tema de las relaciones quieras unir todos los tramos de una vía si comparten las mismas características, pero en este caso, algunos tramos de la rotonda pertenecían a relaciones.
Sigue editando, pero ten cuidado con editar vías principales ;)
Un saludo!
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:02:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. You’ve named five sections of grass as, “Ivanhoe Field”, but these grassy areas appear to simply be residential areas of grass around an apartment complex. Do you have a source for this? Do you have a source for, “Jefferson County Courthouse Field”? Do you have a source for “Bemis Public Library Field” and “Bemis Public Library Field South”? Do you have a source for “Humboldt Garage Random Field”? Do you have a source for “Marion Field”? Do you have a source for “Cheesman Park 13th and Franklin”? Thank you.
partyfan (2019-09-08 22:17:14+00:00): filmed by 11th august  2019  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmE-T0Svu9o&t=87
partyfan (2019-09-08 22:27:41+00:00): filmed by 11th august 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MwAlda957w&t=192
korolenok (2019-09-12 17:44:43+00:00): landuse=residential will be better. See wiki for more details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74238159
skquinn (2019-09-09 03:56:07+00:00): Address for church, which it turns out was already there. (This was so I knew where to merge the church node that used to be to the east.)
Burisma (2019-09-17 12:26:28+00:00): You may merge the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357926420/history into the dam poly.
JessAk71 (2019-09-17 15:41:19+00:00): Hi Burisma, that node was deleted because there was another duplicate node with similar information here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357941533 Figured it was best to remove the duplicate node that had older dates (357926420) and keep the node with a more recent date as is (357941533). Also the elevation tag is best as a node anyway rather than a polygon. In light of this I am inclined to leave the node and polygon tags as they are but please feel free to make changes.
freebeer (2019-09-17 19:56:05+00:00): (blast.  try again...)

hoi jess,

if you didn't know you can also create a simple polygon in p2 from a node, keeping its history and transferring the tags.  i forget which meta-key it is - shift? - and drag the node near the desired outline.  my tablet soft-kezboard keeps that modifier to itself.

i've used it often for graveyards imported as nodes and no doubt other things.  the corners or outline needs tweaking, of course, and for a polygon like this it would be ugly, although i think with shift one can redraw a rough polygon (certainly a lake) at nearly the speed of drawing afresh.

this could be mis-remembering through rose-coloured spectacles, bloodshot eyeballs, or high-diopter beer-googles.

just in case this might be useful for future node->polygon conversions.  che*HIC*ers
JessAk71 (2019-09-18 06:32:04+00:00): Hi freebeer! Thanks for the tip! Good idea. 

Burisma, feel free to make any adjustments to tags, like I said all that was changed was node 357926420 was deleted (because it was a duplicate) and node 357941533 that had similar information was kept (because it has a more recent date), so up to you which you wish to transfer to the polygon but again I am inclined to leave the existing node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357941533 as is because it has elevation and was a gnis node bulk import...
rskedgell (2020-06-04 13:16:39+00:00): Left turn from Bucknall Street into Shaftesbury Avenue prohibited from 2020-06-08 by THE CAMDEN (PRESCRIBED ROUTES) (NO. 5) TRAFFIC ORDER 2020
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3571440
MacLondon (2020-06-04 18:58:28+00:00): Thanks for that. I'm surprised that the raft of changes here could be implemented yet. I know how the final layout will operate here, but I think I might need to survey if that's how this will operate from Monday.
Tomas Straupis (2019-09-09 04:51:47+00:00): Peržiūrėjau pakeitimą. Viskas daugmaž gerai, tik atstačiau anksčiau teisingai pažymėtus privažiavimus prie namų - jie yra highway=service+service=driveway. highway=living_street yra stambesnė gatvė su pavadinimu, tik pažymėta ženklu „gyvenamoji zona“.
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:04:41+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. Do you have sources for these changes? Thank you
miche101 (2019-09-09 08:27:28+00:00): Hi,

danke fürs ergänzen von der Bushaltestelle, aber ich glaub dabei ist ein Stück Straße gelöscht worden... :-\ Müss ich mir später anschauen... eventuell teilweise reverten. 

Gruß Miche
miche101 (2019-09-11 07:07:55+00:00): hab es gerichtet :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74338556

mfg Miche
Allroads (2019-09-17 15:30:50+00:00): Hoi, 
Ik wil u even attent maken op het volgende.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=762855#p762855
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:12:11+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. Do you have sources for these changes? Thank you
ein Schaf (2019-09-09 00:27:51+00:00): Die Umleitung der BVG-Buslinie 341 ist laut Aushang an den außer Betrieb genommenen Halte- und Wartepositionen an den Bushaltestellen "Haberstraße" und "Nobelstraße/Bergiusstraße" gültig in folgendem Zeitraum:
"Umleitung wegen Bauarbeiten 02.09.2019, ca. 06:00 Uhr - auf weiteres"
ein Schaf (2019-09-09 00:36:55+00:00): Ergänzend dazu die aktuelle Verkehrsmeldung der BVG: https://www.bvg.de/de/Fahrinfo/Verkehrsmeldungen/Verkehrsmeldung-Detail?id=59915
Frans S (2019-09-13 12:16:04+00:00): Hekko. Thanks for mapping
A request. Please update your knowledge about tagging highways. You often map a road/track as unclassified. In between farmland the tag 'Track 'is recommended.
Please pay also attention to the warnings the Id Editor shows and repair them. You  did not connect 7 highways to other highways,

Best regards and keep mapping
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:13:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. Do you have sources for these changes? Thank you
GinaroZ (2019-09-09 19:25:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding the building to resolve the note. Just to point out that in the editor there is a function to "square" the corners - either press Q or right click - so that the building is the correct shape. :)
skquinn (2019-09-09 03:55:30+00:00): Computer shop and pet boarding facility. Not sure why it cut the description short
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:17:39+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. Do you have sources for these changes? Thank you
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:42:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
JodaStephen (2019-09-09 08:56:20+00:00): Shrug. The road is completely closed at present, marking it as a service road implies it can be passed IMO. Maybe highway=construction ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74239622
MacLondon (2019-09-09 12:25:40+00:00): The access=no tag would infer that there is no general access, i.e. that it is closed. On the standard map this appears as a dashed grey line along the road.

I'd suggest enclosing the outline of the damaged bridge with landuse=construction (+ layer=1) to highlight the closure on the map, and if known maybe also add a barrier=fence where the road itself is closed off.

IMO highway=construction would imply the road doesn't yet exist as a feature, but as far as I know the repair work is to the support for the central arch of this bridge and the road itself does still physically exist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-14 13:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74474318 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Indonesia by known fantasy mapper.  Previous attempts to contact the mapper have failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3160
Kovoschiz (2019-09-09 05:59:43+00:00): You misaligned a lot of them, shifted them over the correct one.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-09 06:00:16+00:00): Don't rely on the other way for offset.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-09 06:01:47+00:00): Some are correct, but you seem to moving entire segments so making the other parts incorrect
jonathanchik (2019-09-10 02:05:48+00:00): I was doing a point-by-point moving. Which section of Lung Cheung Road you are talking on the misalignment. I will take a closer look for better alignment in future.
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:47:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Frans S (2019-09-13 10:05:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I'm a validator and reviews mapped task.
You caused a few errors by connecting highway nodes to landuse/area nodes.
GPS driven NAV systems cannot handle these situations. 
Never connect a highway node to buildings, areas and landuse nodes.
Except for buildings, you can cross these, without  let the nodes snap to each other.
When you was finalizing this task the inline validater of iDeditor popped up to warn you about these errors. Please pay attention to those warnings and solve them by future mappings
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-09-12 09:01:04+00:00): Hello Wade. Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please pay attention to warnings and correct issues on  I D editor. This is a new development to get better maps.
When you map farmland areas ( is that a request here? not mentioned in the instructions)  do not connect nodes to existing highways. These are errors and have to be solved.  This is why the warnings did pops up.
Best regards
Frans S (2019-09-12 09:04:13+00:00): Hello. Another point. You tag roads ( tracks or paths) in between farmland as unclassified highways. Please refresh your knowledge about tagging Highways.
Always connect crossing highways to eachother
Best regards
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:22:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mueschel (2019-09-17 09:04:10+00:00): Could you check this way - it has many foreign tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252988140

Thanks
Jan
WoodWoseWulf (2019-09-12 04:52:50+00:00): Hi Rokeby,

You've got the entire town centre of Purcellville set as a single footpath and sidewalk in this changeset.

I'd guess that's a tagging error? Normally sidewalks are either mapped along roads or mapped as a property of roads.

Let me know if you need any help fixing it :)
Akkurator (2019-12-25 00:46:04+00:00): Hallo Superflomm,

bist du dir hier mit Adresse Bruggerhof 1 sicher?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684718190
Die Gebäude sind jetzt bei Maps4BW drin und dort ist es Nr. 2 und das Wohnhaus hat die Nr 6.

Grüße,
Akkurator
SuperFlomm (2019-12-25 04:06:44+00:00): Hallo, die Hausnummer habe ich von einer Einladung, die ich bekommen hatte. Es kann aber sein, dass sich die Hausnummer mittlerweile geändert hat. Keine Ahnung.

Google Maps hat übrigens das Wohnhaus als Nr. 1 drin.
https://goo.gl/maps/LtxUBFKzefnKgz6y7
Akkurator (2019-12-25 15:34:24+00:00): Interessant.
Dann gibt es also 3 verschiedene Aussagen, wobei ich bei Hausnummern auf google keinen Pfifferling gebe und bei Maps4BW noch nie eine falsche gesehen habe.

Ich werde bei Gelegenheit mal dort vorbeiradeln und nachsehen.
Akkurator (2019-12-26 20:09:25+00:00): Erledigt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78890548
marc__marc (2020-04-03 16:41:08+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158911023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63939599
did you manualy type fee:parking or it's a preset ?
because it is parking:fee
Regards,
Marc
chnav (2019-11-18 05:27:45+00:00): Река Трубеж уже нарисована. Данная линия является частью границы районов и не несёт никаких тегов.

Правка откачена.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-09 10:52:41+00:00): `man_made=pumping_station` is different from the `building`
nmsl🤣 (2019-09-12 10:06:18+00:00): 不会编辑地图不要乱搞
chachafish (2019-09-09 13:18:47+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset there seem to be a number of questionable edits. Do you have sources for these changes? Thank you
chnav (2019-12-08 21:05:22+00:00): Невменяемая геометрия (самопересечения, неверные статусы дорог).
chnav (2019-12-08 21:13:54+00:00): Интересно, как можно перепутать железную дорогу с автомобильной.
Glassman (2019-09-09 23:26:28+00:00): Tip: instead of deleting objects, try to modify then, like the golf greens. We keep track of the objects version in history.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74244039
Hjart (2019-10-02 17:51:43+00:00): Please note that "garden allotments" is the correct "designation" here
xcep (2019-10-02 20:12:48+00:00): No, it is not. I know the site well from surveying locally: the houses 117-144 are all residential homes, unlike all those behind, which are correctly mapped as garden allotments. Could you therefore revise the undo? (And please refrain from undoing commented changes when armchairing)
Hjart (2019-10-02 20:21:31+00:00): I think you changed a much larger area than just those houses, which was why we reverted.
luiswoo (2019-09-09 17:46:17+00:00): 40 с5, а не 40стр5, так же как и 40 к3 вместо 40к3… а похрен, всё равно это откатывать будут.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places