Adamant1 (2019-04-26 21:36:25+00:00): "Speculate all you like about curtains and planters, meanwhile, I'll shrug (and pay little heed to word salad by others). You haven't really proven or disproven anything."

I used the evidence in OpenStreetMap to show it's a residence. That's what the things they provide are there for. I also provided a link to another site showing people live there. I'm not sure how that's speculation, but whatever. Btw, you forgot the garden in the back. I'm not sure where the word salad was either. 

"Prove to yourself this is state park land"

You weren't originally making the argument it was "state park land." You said its part of the park because it might be used for storage. Which it isn't. So now your moving the goal post to "well they own the land at least." Which really doesn't matter to what tag is used. As I've said, the leisure=park tag isn't about ownership or landuse anyway. It's about a leisure activity that takes place where the tag is being used. If people live there and its not a place for leisure, then it's a residence and therefore should be tagged as residential land, not as a park. The tag isn't about ownership and you can't prove ownership by one GIS source that's probably inaccurate anyone, but just because they rent it from the state park department, if they even do, doesn't matter. I'm not sure why you have such a problem with that. 

"I think people live there" to say otherwise, and while that may be true""

1. I didn't say "I think" people live there. I provided evidence that they do and you provided none that they don't. It's not my "thoughts" It's what the tools in OSM and other sources show. 

2."While that may be true" exactly, it might or might not, you don't really care about the evidence I provided they do from multiple sources. Your just going to go with the a single source that's probably unreliable and an interpretation of the tag that doesn't fit anyway either way. 

So what's the point in even discussing it in the first place then? Your the one that said you were open to talking about things and that if I want to change things I should discuss things and show why they should be changed. It's a massive waste of my time if you just discard the research I did off hand as simply "my opinion" and stick to your black and white, single unreliable source of  interpretation of things. I also wonder what you think the point in the images OSM provides us to find out these things are if in every instance where they show what you think is wrong you discard them as evidence for something. They all clearly show someone lives there and the park tag doesn't fit just because it's owned by the parks department even if someone doesn't. So I'm not sure why you have such problem with re-tagging it. It's just one little area in a residential area that know one even uses or parks at. So why does it matter so if it's mapped as residential? It clearly should be. 

"I don't recall "we" (you or I, or OSM generally) "have already established else everything owned or maintained by the parks department doesn't automatically get tagged as a park,"

Well, I mean, in the same way that the corporate headquarters of the San Francisco Giants doesn't get tag as leisure=pitch because a sports team owns it or the property of my local fish and game office where I buy a fishing licenses, which is down town, doesn't get tagged as a national park because it's ran by parks department people etc etc etc. So, "we" as in the OpenStreetMap community that decided through the consensus that you spend so much time talking about decided those things by making the park tag a leisure tag and not a landuse tag. Like the wiki says "A park is an area of open space for recreational use" A fenced off house, building, storage, whatever you want to call it, isn't open or used for recreation. Especially since people live in it. I zero ambiguity there. 

If you have such a problem with it, talk to people in the community, build consensus, "do more listening," change the wiki to make it fit what you think a park is, etc etc etc blah blah blah. That's what you told me to do, repeatedly. I guess those things don't matter now that it's on you to do them though huh? SMH