piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-11-29 15:08:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Do not over extract. Especially in roads / rivers networks, there may be many paths / streams in the imagery. You are not requested to map them all, and most of the time you can trace only the main ones as explained in the instruction.
Main roads are to be tagged as highway=unclassified in general
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129328123
Frans S (2022-11-29 15:08:13+00:00): quote of Michael Montani, PM on this project about tracks :
Regarding tracks, we usually use them when the scope of the road is generic or unclear (it is used to reach agricultural or natural areas), while we put unclassified only when it is a clear connector between villages and towns. Often, you need to look far away your mapping area to understand the role of one road. People in Somalia are mainly moving by foot, small motorbikes and vehicles, and by going through the desert they actually create the trace. I personally tend to map a road/path if I see it is leading to something (a village, a small pond, and hedge), even though, as before, you may have to look a bit futher your mapping area to take a final decision. I hope this cleared your questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129328123
eggie (2022-11-24 18:48:33+00:00): Hi Radkitt
Please put a Import-request at the Dutch forum. Please don't add addresses to buildings.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/253
Greetz
eggie
PierZen (2025-08-11 18:32:37+00:00): La page wiki n'est pas une bible. Dans l'historique de cette page wiki, je reconnais plusieurs contributeurs internationaux.  Tout comme pour le réseau routier principal, nous devons créer une hiérarchie des routes et des tronçons principaux sur quelques 200km la classifications secondaire est appropriée. Et on doit réfléchir aux attributs qui permettent de bien distinguer ce réseau forestier  du réseau primaire.
webfil (2025-08-16 17:33:09+00:00): Le wiki est censé être le reflet du consensus émanant des discussions entre les différents utilisateurs. Je ne me souviens pas d'avoir vu sur talk-ca des discussions à propos des chemins forestiers, en tous cas pas récemment. Les chemins forestiers sont des routes précaires, dont l'entretien relève uniquement de ses usagers, fermées l'hiver sauf quelques exceptions notables. Pour les chemins principaux qui relient des villages ou de chameaux habités, ou encore des équipements importants, ils répondent en tous points à la définition généralement acceptée de l'attribut highway=tertiary (p. ex. chemins vers Parent, Obedjiwan, Chute-des-Passes ou vers des parcs nationaux, réserves fauniques, etc.). Pour les chemins forestiers de moindre importance (ceux qui ne sont pas des routes à proprement parler), les attributs highway=unclassified et l'ensemble des déclinaisons de highway=track avec ses sous-attributs suffisent largement à établir une hiérarchie de chemins forestiers. Highway=secondary sur des routes forestières ne sert pas les utilisateurs des données et des cartes et produit des résultats plus que discutables avec certains engins de routage (p. ex. Open route service).
PierZen (2025-08-16 18:14:39+00:00): Je suis à essayer de faire un peu de ménage et il y a effectivement beaucoup de chemins qui doivent être classifiés unclassified ou track.  À mon avis,  les chemins numérotés en forêt (exemple Chemin : R0928 id=256106388) sont les chemins principaux, highway=tertiary. Dans certains cas pour les plus longs chemins principaux plus structurants tels que chemin Parent highway=secondary.  Pour aussi décrire le caractère particulier de ces chemins et les distinguer du réseau routier du ministère des transports, j'ajoute la balise priority=overweight_truck. J'ai aussi créé une nouvelle balise qui me semble appropriée pour attirer l'attention sur les risques associés à ces chemins et même à des chemins tels la route 389, soit hazard=isolated_road_extreme_weather.
webfil (2025-08-18 19:26:38+00:00): Dans le SIG de la Ville de La Tuque, le chemin de Parent (route 25 ou R0461) est en effet de classe 1, mais c'est aussi vrai pour le chemin R0806 (qui relie la R1009 à Senneterre), la R0403 (route 1) de Rivière-aux-Rats à son extrémité ouest, la R1009 de la limite nord à la R1045 (donc excluant la portion entre la R0806 et la R1009, qui est de classe 2)... bref, la logique de numérotation des chemins forestiers échappe au sens commun de la topologie.

La définition attribut du wiki pour ~~~highway=tertiary~~~ ( [roads connecting smaller settlements, and within large settlements for roads connecting local centres](osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary) ) me semble largement convenir à la route Parent-La Tuque ainsi qu'à la plupart des chemins forestiers «principaux» (ceux vers Clova, le Rapide-Blanc, Opitciwan, Senneterre, Manawan, etc.), puisqu'il s'agit de routes qui connectent des établissements humains sans être des maillons d'un réseau national subprimaire comme le seraient des éléments avec l'attribut ~~~highway=tertiary~~~ ([highways which are not part of major routes, but nevertheless form a link in the national route network](osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). En somme, il me semble incohérent que le chemin vers Chute-des-Passes soit de niveau secondaire, alors que celui qui relie Saint-Ludger-de-Milot à une route numéroté soit de niveau tertiaire.
archie (2022-11-24 15:05:59+00:00): Jag har reverterat denna cs. Denna väg har taggats som "service" av en mycket erfaren, mångårig mappare som noggrant mappar område för område. Du är en blodig nybörjare som inte har i närheten av den erfarenhet som den ursprunglige mapparen har. Så när du menar att en väg bör taggas annorlunda är du vänlig att hädanefter FÖRST höra med denne mappare om den tilltänkta ändringen av taggningen. Om det finns andra skäl till din ändring av taggningen, t ex order - allmänt eller specifikt - från din arbetsgivare (PostNord) som betalar dina editeringar här på osm, så får du skriva det i kommentaren till ändringen.
Vinber-Pro (2022-11-25 10:32:41+00:00): English below
--
Bonjour,
dans la continuité de l'échange (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129210704) auquel vous n'avez pas répondu, vous avez édité 23 fois ce points en 3 mois, le résultat est un gros mélange !

Stop

Hello,
following on from the exchange (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129210704) to which you did not reply, you have edited this point 23 times in 3 months, the result is a big mess!
bxl-forever (2022-11-24 15:59:30+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116846952/history (version #4)
You added role=outer + type=multipolygon on a way.

I think there is a mistake here.  This is not how the OSM data model works.  Those tags are to be used on relations, not ways/areas.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-26 10:46:10+00:00): Dear, would that runway still be in use? If so, we would need to add some kind of aerodrome, for example "aeroway=airstrip"+"name=Kaavi Airstrip".
If not, we should add a "disused" to it in one way or another.
waterproof_19m (2022-11-27 12:29:26+00:00): Hello

It seems that I should remove this airstrip because it is not reflected in the official lists. It's probably someone's private airstrip and aircraft garage.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-27 12:34:07+00:00): That would be a very bad reason to remove the airstrip! There are hundreds of smallish airstrips mapped that are private property and or strictly restricted to the owner's use. Especially the UK is littered with them. Do keep it!
Accidentally, I have just now added a couple of tags to the underlying "landuse=meadow", I hope you can agree. Kind regards!
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-27 12:35:48+00:00): As an afterthought: it would however be perfectly okay to add an "access=private" tag, either to the runway or to the "aerodrome" or to both.
◪ Jarv (2022-11-25 23:47:01+00:00): Hi Anonymous 10.
I've reverted these changes as Western Road is correct.
Western Road and The section of dyke road that you changed is a one-way street with a contraflow bus lane (which also allows taxis & bicycles). The tags on the road were correct before
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 00:35:59+00:00): Witaj,

W kluczu maxstay nie powinno używać się skrótów typu hr.

Więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay

Poprawiłem użycie 2 hr na 2 hours:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129346816
Mariusz189 (2022-12-05 21:55:15+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś sklep polaris ? według ich strony ten sklep tu istnieje ale na zdjęciach drogowych go nie ma pod tym adresem, o co chodzi ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4697695291/history
marczoutendijk (2022-12-01 10:13:01+00:00): Hi,
The correct way to tag a river is like so:
waterway=river
I fixed it for you.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116911653
archie (2022-11-24 15:41:01+00:00): Även denna cs har reverterats. Jag har i cs (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129312676) uppgivit för dig skälen härtill samt lämnat tips om en alternativ taggning. Du har även påmints om osm-principen "Don't edit for the renderer".
archie (2022-11-24 16:29:24+00:00): Jag misstänker starkt att du redan tidigare försökt att tweaka med hastighetsgränsen på dessa vägar. Då under annat user-alias: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121881121
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:58:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
literan (2022-11-26 10:24:43+00:00): Не надо создавать дубли существующих объектов
Федонатор (2022-11-26 10:41:52+00:00): У первой метки названия нет, а назвать не могу
literan (2022-11-26 11:07:48+00:00): не можете - не делайте. В крайнем случае поставьте заметку. Такой правкой вы делаете хуже, а не лучше.
gscholz (2022-11-25 06:45:08+00:00): Hi erroCarrilOSM,
this changeset has caused errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-89.81177&lat=20.82634&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129332577

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-11-26 08:50:10+00:00): Dag hj..  Je vraagt feedback..  Ziet er goed uit.
Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
kukułka (2022-11-26 07:51:18+00:00): Hej - dawny cmentarz parafii św. Józefa i św. Brygidy nie jest lasem, tam nie ma "dzikich" ani nasadzonych współcześnie drzew, jest czytelny układ alei na planie krzyża, i opiekuje się tym  ZDiZ czasem sprzątając.
czebureks (2022-11-27 14:27:23+00:00): Cześć! Byłem tam jakiś czas temu i teren sprawiał wrażenie zaniedbanego i zarośniętego. Ale faktycznie, jeżeli ZDiZ zajmuje się nim regularnie, można go uznać za park.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-11-25 10:23:45+00:00): En ook hier schade door schuiven.
eggie (2022-11-25 10:24:52+00:00): schade wederom hersteld
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Michal Rzeznik (2022-11-24 16:47:25+00:00): Niestety nie wiem dlaczego, ale próbując dodać nowy punkt - serwis komputerowy, aplikacja zmieniła istniejący wpis - zegarmistrz.
NorthCrab (2022-11-24 23:52:59+00:00): Poprawiłem to co nie działało :P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129346365
luschi (2023-01-12 17:11:48+00:00): Hallo,     
wenn der Hof einen Hofladen betreibt, sollte dies mit `shop=farm` erfasst werden nicht mit dem hier von dir verwendeten `seamark:production_area:category` tagging, welches für Windparks oder Ölbohrinseln im Meer verwendet werden.

LG
Andrea Musuruane (2022-11-25 16:43:42+00:00): Ciao. Qui mancavano due tratti che non sono stati modificati e che ho corretto io. Mi chiedevo però se anche queste way fossero da correggere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810684906, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126451754 Ciao, Andrea
grawal (2022-11-26 07:53:25+00:00): Percorso: 126451754 dovrebbe essere a posto.
Percorso: 810684906 non so perchè mi sono fermato a Pianetti. (Ma credo sia uguale). Ciao, Walter
Ciao.
silversurfer83 (2022-11-26 19:30:01+00:00): Hier fehlt der eigentliche Haupt-Tag. Was ist das? Ein Geschäft? Und bei der Webseite sieht es nach einem Tippfehler aus. Guck da noch mal rein.

(nebenbei: Auf diese Kommentare kannst du auch antworten)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129336857