piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stevea (2019-04-21 01:11:47+00:00): I've owned property for many years which includes nearly 200 feet of creek which are part of a "riparian corridor," also quite literally "my backyard" (private ownership residential real property).  Only once in 17 years have I have heard hikers down there, they said "we thought this was part of the park."  Cupping my hands, I yelled down (I couldn't see them, I could only hear them) "no, it's private property...".  Who is correct?

This is similar to, but not exactly the same as beaches being BOTH said to be private property, yet also able to be legally (not always physically) accessed by the public.  Who is correct.  While you are at it, go look up the "Streisand Effect," the legal doctrine of which was won in court by a local friend of mine, active in OSM (we've collaborated on bike route mapping together).

Besides, with your lack of specificity as to a node, way or relation by identifying it by number (please get into the habit of this, as changesets contain many elements), I have no idea about which park or beach you might ask me to discern.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 07:34:34+00:00): I'll address the other stuff later, but maybe the fact that you can't tell which park I mean without me providing a node number goes to show that parks are over mapped around here. Just a thought. 

Btw, if you don't mind I'd like to transfer some of these changeset discussions into notes so they are easier to keep track of and easy to comment on by other people if they want. Id be more then willing to summarize the discussion points if need be and we can link to the old changeset comments so anyone can read them if they want (don't go off on me about trying to hide anything either. I'm just suggesting it because I think it would be easier to manage. Especially since we have so many of them going on).
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 07:36:28+00:00): Then I could also put the note on the specific place that's being discussed so there wouldn't be any confusion or anything on where exactly we are talking about.
geoaria (2019-04-01 07:55:16+00:00): در محوطه های دانشگاهی و نظامی بایست از مسیر با تگ service استفاده شود . 
لطفا برای هر مسیر یک خط جداگانه در نظر گرفته شود و با یک خط تمام مسیر ها را رسم نکنید.
محدوده دانشگاه ترسیم شده توسط شما منطبق بر محدوده واقعی نیست و با بی دقتی بسیار ترسیم شده است. 
در ترسیم محدوده های پارک و چمنزار دقت شود به راهها متصل نشود و منطبق بر تصاویر ماهواره ای باشد.
کمی سلیقه در هنگام ترسیم مسیر ها نقشه را هم زیباتر می کند که متاسفانه اصلا به آن اهمیت نمی دهید
uks (2019-03-25 17:37:37+00:00): Не нужно повышать статус дорог для перекрёстков с круговым движением!
user_5359 (2019-03-23 08:32:14+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast an dem Tannenweg den Schlüssel highgway (beachte das zweite g) hinzugefügt. Da in allen Fällen der gleiche Werte wie highway gesetzt wurde, habe ich den Tippfehler gelöscht. Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst die gewünschte Änderung korrekt einzutragen, kannst Du Dich gerne melden.
archie (2019-03-20 10:24:13+00:00): Hej, bara som tips, jag har nyss taggat om en del ställen liknande Erikshjälpen (alltså inte auktionshallen) som shop=charity + second_hand=yes. Vad tycker du om detta?
johanemilsson (2019-03-20 11:03:49+00:00): Tja! Låter rimligt. I fix
AndersAndersson (2019-03-23 00:54:14+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM!
Jag återställde taggarna i gamla brandstationen. De används till 3D-kartor. Multipolygoner används inte på det sättet.
Smedjebackens kommun har 10000 invånare, men tätorten har inte så många. Jag ändrar tillbaka.
AndersAndersson (2019-03-23 00:54:57+00:00): Vill du se 3D-byggnader så kommer länken här. Dock är det lite segt med uppdateringarna så brandstationen ser nog fortfarande fel ut när du tittar på den.
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=60.1404494&lon=15.4120630&zoom=18&camera.theta=68.491&camera.phi=30.08
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-29 06:43:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6349325189/history - what kind of place of worship was here?

Do you remember its religion?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6349325189/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155799443 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3888324
eggie (2019-03-20 11:13:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
andrewwiseman (2019-03-26 21:01:12+00:00): Thanks for mapping. However the project you are mapping is buildings only, please do only that. Also you added names to a number of roads and buildings, please do not add names unless you know them from visiting that location. And when mapping roads, it is best here to use "unclassified" or "track" - you mapped them as primary, which means large, multilane wide roads that connect large cities. These are more like farm tracks. If you have questions, please ask the project manager, whoever organized your mapathon, or me. Thank you.
mueschel (2019-03-22 09:54:18+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded a huge amount of objects with only foreign tags that shouldn't appear in the OSM data base. Please take some time and clean up these tags.
Examples:

    CONTACT=7.74558639E8
    CONTACT_1=99999999
    COUNTY=LAMWO
    DISTRICT=LAMWO
    DISTRICT_1=LAMWO
    E=458950.51
    ELEVATION=977.0
    EMIS_No_=4458.0
    End_time=11_07_1937
    FBC=0.0
    FMC=0.0
    FPC=7.0
    FT=2.0
    FTC=0.0
    FTC_1=0.0
    FTE_2018=48.0
    FY1_E=7.0
    FY2_E=5.0
    FY3_E=9.0
    FY4_E=8.0
    FY5_E=8.0
    FY6_E=11.0
    FY7_E=0.0
    F_TOTAL=0.0
    GUIDE=OLANYA DAVID
    ID=163.0
    LATITUDE=3.468773
    LEVEL=Primary
    LISTER=WAISWA BAKER
    LONGTITUDE=32.631165
    License_No=99999
    MBC=0.0
    MMC=0.0
    MT=5.0
    MTC=0.0
    MTE_2018=49.0
    MY1_E=3.0
    MY2_E=5.0
    MY3_E=9.0
    MY4_E=6.0
    MY5_E=11.0
    MY6_E=9.0
    MY7_E=6.0
    M_TOTAL=0.0
    N=1.03837161E7
    NEW_S=29.0
    NON_FPC=0.0
    NON_FTC=0.0
    NT_F=0.0
    NT_M=2.0
    Ownership=Government
    PARISH=LAMWO
    PF_E=83.0
    PM_E=96.0
    PPF_E=0.0
    PPM_E=0.0
    PPT_E=0.0
    PT_E=179.0
    RC=Completed
    REGION=ACHOLI
    REG_No=99999
    REG_STATUS=Registered
    SCHOOL_NAM=LAMWOGOGO P.S
    SEX=Mixed-Boys and Girls)
    STATUS=Operational
    STATUS_C=School in Masterlist
    SUBCOUNTY=PALABEK-KAL
    SUPERVISOR=MAGALA MICHAEL
    S_CONTACT=7.77324266E8
    S_DATE=23_06_2018
    S_TIME=11_07_1937
    Team=Team 7
    Type=Day
    VILLAGE=OROM CENTRAL
Frans S (2019-09-30 14:44:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. It's a while ago that you mapped this , but due to a huge backlog on validating tasks it comes just now to my attention.
Some remarks. Please square the buildings you've mapped with the Q key in IDeditor. 
You names several buildings, Do you have local knowledge? If not, Please stick to the generic tag building=yes
Local people will adjust the mappings later on.
Best regards and keep mapping.
tahasin (2019-07-03 03:01:54+00:00): Hi Diana IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the node 3812842016 and node 604021468 classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'track' as the path is no clear in any of the imagery

And from node 3812842016 till node 3604021778 it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Palolo (2019-09-03 19:07:18+00:00): @[Rohan Betepwad] Do you have local knowledge of a hospital in this location? What is the name of the facility?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:49:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6349384988/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
Palolo (2019-07-30 20:26:11+00:00): What is your source of information for these two "Hospitals"? It is important to accurately map features we know to exist. Please remove features that do not exist on the ground.
user_5359 (2019-03-22 16:09:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Palolo (2019-08-12 13:12:57+00:00): Do you have local knowledge about a hospital at this site? The infrastructure does not have the characteristics of a hospital.
luiswoo (2019-03-20 12:49:58+00:00): Улицы не обозначаются грунтовкой, это делается через указание покрытия и прочих параметров.
Palolo (2019-06-26 04:21:31+00:00): Please only map buildings for this project
Palolo (2019-08-18 19:57:41+00:00): Please do not group buildings together and only add the name= tag if you have local knowledge.
Palolo (2019-04-08 20:44:07+00:00): @[Suman Dutta] Thank you for contributing to OSM, do you have local knowledge about a restaurant in the lower left corner? Please also note that the directions only call for tracing buildings.  thanks
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:58:50+00:00): Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Please follow the instructions, we are only asking for buildings to be accurately mapped and with square corners.
Palolo (2019-06-26 04:20:06+00:00): We appreciate the effort to map Tanzania, but would appreciate if you would follow the instructions to accurately map the buildings with square corners.
Palolo (2019-04-08 21:10:31+00:00): @[vimal regha bojan] Thank you for your contributions. Do you have local knowledge about these hospitals and other amenities? The HOT task instructions only call for buildings to be accurately traced. it is dangerous to tag something as a hospital if it isn't since OSM is used by people to get help.
Palolo (2019-04-08 18:31:30+00:00): @kotesh Thank you for your contributions. Please note that the instructions for this task only call for buildings. We do not need landuse areas.  Also the name= should only be added if you have local knowledge of the feature.
Palolo (2019-07-30 20:23:36+00:00): Do you have local knowledge about a hospital at this location. It is important that we accurately map all buildings and not invent features that do not exist.
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:54:28+00:00): Thank you for helping with this project. In the future please read the instructions for mapping the buildings accurately.
Palolo (2019-07-30 20:21:30+00:00): Do you have local knowledge about a clinic, cafe, and other amenities at this location? People's lives depend on knowing the location of hospitals. Please remove features you do now know to be correct.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
chnuessli (2021-08-17 07:38:56+00:00): Wäre hier nicht amenity=railway_station auch noch angebracht?
Palolo (2019-06-26 04:20:57+00:00): Please note that the name tag should only be used if you know the local name. the proper tag is building=yes
Palolo (2019-04-12 18:50:17+00:00): @Sarannia Do you have a source for this artwork, supermarket, motorway, and slipway? They are not apparent on the imagery
Stereo (2019-03-20 19:12:24+00:00): Hi Pedja, thank you for fixing this. Please get in touch with us at the Data Working Group if you need help.
Pedja (2019-03-21 02:12:01+00:00): No problem. 

But it is tiring to police data and check for vandalisation.

I hope OSM will do something to stop vandals.
Self-Perfection (2019-08-23 17:48:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. У вас довольно странные контуры садовых товариществ вышли в этой правке, ну например https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678134371 - со странным протуберанцем с северо-запада. Вы исключительно по спутниковым снимкам правили?
Damnit (2019-08-24 15:08:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Нет, кадастровые границы я беру из документов по территориальному планированию. На ФГИС ТП их полно, и как-то обсуждалось, что это - часть законодательства и их применение вполне себе валидно. Просто кладу их графическую часть как подложку. Горицы (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/57.1535/36.7318) вообще исключительно по ним нарисованы, ибо лицензионно чистых спутников в этой области нет.
Leo Slager (2019-03-20 23:08:00+00:00): Op een brievenbus hoort geen naam te staan.
Ik pas even wat aan.
Leo Slager (2019-03-20 23:20:46+00:00): Van alle wijzigingen zijn de namen verwijderd van de brievenbussen.
Ik hoop niet dat je een nieuw speeltje aan het uit proberen was en dat er nu niet bestaande brievenbussen op de kaart zijn gezet.
OpenStreetMap is een serieuze zaak.
En je wijzigingen zijn gelijk wereldwijd voor iedereeen zichtbaar.
Frans S (2019-03-23 11:19:47+00:00): Hi Marco. Thanks for mapping.  A remark
Short pieces of highway between building should never been tagged as tertiary link. Residential should be better here. Please always connect highways by the nodes. (here the road is hidden by trees, but could be extrapolated.  
Thanks
viloan (2019-03-20 11:57:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
russdeffner (2019-03-21 17:13:47+00:00): Hi Emma, just noticing - lots of your roads are connected to buildings and have a weird loop at the end. Not sure how that's happening, but maybe slow down and a bit (and zoom in further) when you get to the villages/structures to make sure you are not connecting roads to buildings. Looking pretty good otherwise (classification is always difficult, check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa for more help there). Happy Mapping!
emmatheresaj (2019-03-22 10:18:13+00:00): @russdeffner I don't know if you get notified for this, but thanks for checking over my work! I'll pay more attention to that, I've fallen afoul of sticky nodes in Arc before.
eggie (2019-03-20 12:51:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Persoonlijke notes zijn niet toegestaan in OSM en zullen worden verwijderd. 
Is dit wellicht een bedrijf?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-20 12:54:30+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #68334784
p166mmx (2019-03-20 15:05:27+00:00): Dank voor de tips. Het was mijn eerste poging, zag allerlei punten zoals winkels en andere bedrijven en wilde proberen dit toe te voegen.
eggie (2019-03-20 15:26:47+00:00): Oke... adresnodes weet je in ieder geval te vinden. Hierop  kun je inderdaad winkels en bedrijven aan toevoegen. 
Succes ermee,
Eggie
user_3216889 (2019-03-20 16:37:52+00:00): Footway=sidewalk weglaten.
Sidewalk wordt enkel gebruikt op een weg zelf om aan te geven dat er parallel trottoirs liggen, die niet op de kaart zijn ingetekend.
abakus_uploader (2019-03-20 23:30:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 11:34:46+00:00): Rocky crags behind peoples houses aren't parks. This park in particular doesn't extend along the back of the rocks like you have it. It only takes up a very small area by the road. If you want to map the rest as a beach, cool, but its not where the park goes.
stevea (2019-04-21 00:21:42+00:00): There are two relations, 9415427 and 9415331.  This is likely incorrect and an oversight, I am examining both how best to conflate both relations into a single one and how to tag it with your concerns.  It appears the northerly one is colloquially known as "Santa Maria's Beach" and while it isn't part of Rockview Drive County Park, the two polygons that make up Santa Maria's Beach (one seems to be correctly tagged beach, one is tagged leisure=park, yet is on a beach).

As my county parks department calls this a park, and I and hundreds of thousands of others make it their job to channel what people live and visit here want, I accede to their nomenclature by tagging this a park.

I understand you wish for there to be a wholesale conversion of potentially every park in California to not be tagged leisure=park, yet you have not proposed any plan to do this, an ad hoc approach must suffice unless and until you or somebody does.

Stand by, I am now considering some edit choices which I hope will clarify and improve.
stevea (2019-04-21 01:03:17+00:00): Now rendering, let's see if I got it right, though the renderer is only an aid, not the ultimate authority on whether or not the data are correct.
stevea (2019-04-21 01:04:36+00:00): Relation ...331 remains, ...427 was deleted.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 02:44:36+00:00): "I understand you wish for there to be a wholesale conversion of potentially every park in California to not be tagged leisure=park"

Hhhmmm not sure where I said that, or how asking about a few specific parks out of potentially millions equates to "every park in California." Let alone how parks in Santa Cruz equates to all of California. 

Since it's been a few days since you wrote that, maybe you could reflect back on it and see how unnecessarily back handed and hyperbolic you were about this whole thing based on that comment.
stevea (2019-04-26 02:48:23+00:00): YOU said "wholesale conversion," not me.

"A few days since I wrote what?"  Where?  Chase your own damn tail.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 09:35:34+00:00): "YOU said "wholesale conversion," not me."

No you did. In the comment you made 5 days ago. Four comments up from here (or actually 5 after I post this), in the start of the third paragraph. Jeez.
kayle (2019-04-01 14:56:09+00:00): Prečo "Krásno 2"?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-07 04:24:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 69955624, 69954181, 69956297, 69953607, 69958113, 69957134 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2743 etc..
viloan (2019-03-20 13:13:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
4004 (2019-03-24 02:20:45+00:00): навешу теги офиса и производства (вы видимо там собираете).
эх, прошли славные времена интеркома
dvdhoven (2019-03-20 14:33:49+00:00): Met ID moet je van routes afblijven. ID kan geen routes bewerken. Het is een stukje speelgoed, meer niet. 
Als je routes wil bewerken, moet je overstappen op JOSM.
Routes moeten op volgorde liggen, wat betekent dat je soms wegen moet tussenvoegen. Dat kan ID niet, die voegt alles standaard achteraan toe en dat is in de meeste gevallen fout. Ook de sortering van routes met forward en backward wordt ID totaal verprutst en ik heb inmiddels bij elkaar dagen besteed om alles weer goed te krijgen.
Buraddo (2019-03-20 13:52:11+00:00): What geometry did you improve? Using old imagery and putting a lot of nodes that don't even correlate with the data in OSM doesn't help anybody, this edit and a lot of others like this one are damaging.
Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers (2019-03-27 15:42:45+00:00): For history purpose. We had discussed in chat. All issues with ref`s where solved in following relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9395909 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9398352 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9431523
4004 (2019-03-31 02:35:08+00:00): ну зачем же так топорно сносить целые здания, когда достаточно было убрать название. откат
Frans S (2019-03-21 11:21:41+00:00): Hi, I review tasks before Validating them,
Please use the highway tag "residential" only in urban areas ( hamlets, villages etc) . In the Bush here, track, unclassified and path are more appropriate
Thanks for mapping
manuel-bg (2019-03-21 12:17:20+00:00): https://goo.gl/images/YEyrWy
Gh0stz0x (2019-03-21 15:21:39+00:00): Non basta! Devi aggiungere una foto di una persona con inciso sulla schiena la forma e la dicitura del cartello! 😂🤣 Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, bastava solo il source nel changeset. 😉
Grazie per il tuo contributo e benvenuto a bordo! 😁
manuel-bg (2019-03-26 10:29:23+00:00): Ho visto che il nome del sentiero è stato corretto, ma compare (credo sulla mappa) ancora il nome carezzuola che non so come rimuovere
Leo Slager (2019-03-20 22:52:35+00:00): Hier staan nu twee brievenbussen naast elkaar op de kaart.
Dat lijkt mij zeer onwaarschijnlijk.
ik zal je wijzigingen terugdraaien.
scai (2020-03-24 18:24:25+00:00): Haben diese Hydranten tatsächlich einen Namen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6349768817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6349768816
Leo Slager (2019-03-20 22:43:52+00:00): Dag ASiemensma,

Hier staan nu twee brievenbussen aan weerszijden van de weg. Dat lijkt mij zeer onwaarschijnlijk.
Verder hebben brievenbussen geen naam.
Dus die kun je overal weer verwijderen.
Doe je dat zelf ?
Владимир К (2021-06-02 12:09:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны   почитайте про адресацию в челнах, прежде чем дальше делать такие правки, вы переносите номера в невалидные теги
eggie (2019-03-20 15:22:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

In veel gevallen is het zo dat tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van eenrichting.
Is dat hiet het geval?
Dan een regel toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no
en evt.
oneway:moped=no
MVG,
Eggie
EvoLt (2019-03-20 15:34:06+00:00): Hallo,

Ja de tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van deze regel. Ik ben nog vrijwel nieuw bij OSM map editing. Ik edit normaal gezien regelmatig bij Waze.

Mvg,
EvoLt (2019-03-20 15:36:19+00:00): Ik heb beide regels ook toegevoegd. Bedankt voor de welkom.
eggie (2019-03-20 16:28:04+00:00): Top!