piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-01-09 19:42:15+00:00): Gebruik voor openingstijden deze tool.. openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Dan krijg je de juiste syntaxis. Invuillen in de tool (selectie)  en dan het resultaat in de tagging plakken. 
Verder even "miereneuken"..  
Het begin en het einde van het brug/tunnel gedeelte vastmaken aan het gebouw. 
Gr Eggie
JM82 (2020-01-25 19:33:51+00:00): Hallo RainerMeyer,

Dankenswerterweise wurde ich durch einen User von OSM aufmerksam gemacht, dass du in diesem CS großflächig Landflächen, welche ich vor Jahren in mühsamer Kleinarbeit in OSM eingearbeitet haben (und die noch immer Aktualität besitzen) gelöscht hast.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79386599
Aus welchem Grund bitte?
Bekanntlich spricht nichts dagegen, OSM-Daten zu verändern, nur sollte ein zusätzlicher Mehrnutzen (im Sinne einer zusätzlichen Information) gegeben sein dadurch. Diese liegt hier offenbar nicht vor bei denen Löschungen, im Gegenteil. Paradoxerweise hast du die gelöschten landuse-Flächen durch tag-idente, wesentlich gröber gezeichnete Flächen ersetzt. Also, landuse = farmland auf einem einzelnen Acker durch landuse = farmland über mehrere Äcker "drübergezeichnet".
Bitte erkläre uns - der OSM-Community - a) den Sinn dahinter und b) den Grund dafür?
Akkurator (2020-01-20 00:08:36+00:00): zur Info: dein fehlerhaftes demolished-tagging hat ein anderer Mapper bereits korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79449203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110408117/history
woodpeck (2020-01-28 14:05:38+00:00): Das wäre auch freundlicher gegangen.
PT-53 (2020-01-28 14:24:40+00:00): Hallo woodpeck,
irgendwann geht auch dem freundlichsten Mitwirkenden die Geduld aus!
Mir ist das mit OSMchecker auch schon so gegangen.
Freundliche Grüße
Akkurator (2020-01-30 00:57:52+00:00): Wenn wir schon in dieser Gegen sind: hier war ich auch nicht übertrieben freundlich, nachdem OSMchecker von mir frisch eingezeichnete existierende Zufahrtswege sofort wieder kommentarlos gelöscht hat:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65817859
Trotzdem hat er immerhin die Wege danach wieder eingezeichnet. Kommentarlos.
viloan (2020-01-09 17:20:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 23:43:55+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86156799
Msiipola (2022-09-03 12:02:43+00:00): Hej! Väg 762059215 öster om Nerbruket finns in med i NVDB. 
Finns väg?
Bör nog i så fall vara track eller path, då endast ett otydligt spår av den syns i LM:s ortofoto.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 22:46:15+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86156040
mueschel (2020-01-11 18:10:39+00:00): Please check this way, you added a 'Calle' tag there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283366999
MappnMatt (2020-01-13 16:02:20+00:00): It appears that I made that mistake again. Thank you for showing us that error so that it could be corrected. I am taking steps to be more vigilant moving forward.
Glassman (2020-01-09 19:08:10+00:00): We don't mark temporary features and only use the name tag for valid names. I'll send you more info on OSM. I will need to remove the point you added.
eggie (2020-01-09 19:44:38+00:00): Ja.. en dan taggen we toch op de splitsing in de praktijk tbv de routering.
eggie (2020-01-09 19:46:57+00:00): 'k Denk dan Dick van den Hoven nog wel kijkt. 
Gr Eggie
Ut Fietsmenneke (2020-01-09 21:08:23+00:00): Inzake knp 31. Ondanks dat deze route maar een richting kent v.a. knp 50 op de splitsing leggen ?.
Mutaties voorstellen kijk ik morgen even.
Mvg, Geert
eggie (2020-01-09 22:05:46+00:00): Zelf zoek ik dan de splising op. Anders even een vraagje voor het forum... 
De routeexperts zullen wel meekijken.. want die zien in knooppuntnet dat er iets veranderd is.
Het blijft in ieder geval actueel daar. :)
Gr Eggie
dvdhoven (2020-01-10 07:23:46+00:00): Ik heb alles aangepast zodat de foutmeldingen eruit zijn. Knooppunt 31 moet op de splitsing liggen. Anders werkt het niet in OSM. Een route eenrichting maken is tricky, ik weet niet zeker of knooppuntnet.nl dat aan kan. Ooit heeft A67-A67 wel een verzoek daarvoor ingediend Dus die test loopt.
Maar goed, 31-50, routes krijgen altijd het laagste knooppunt eerst in de note/ref tag, is nu eenrichting gemaakt, dat doe je met de role forward in dit geval.
Verder moeten knooppunten en routes altijd lid worden gemaakt van een netwerk. Dat is hier een lastige, je zit op de grens van Land van Peel en Maas en Noordoost Brabant en daarvoor moeten dan weer speciale regels worden gevolgd.
Echt er zit een hele wereld achter de routes en het is niet iets dat je zo even snel doet.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2020-01-10 07:46:30+00:00): 31-50 in eenrichting lukt niet. Dat wil knooppuntnet;nl niet hebben. Dus ook een terugrichting erbij. Daar merk je niks van.
Vriendelijk, maar dringend verzoek, ga er niet meer in aanpassen. Als er nog dingen niet goed zijn, overleg eerst even met mij.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-19 22:06:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a un terrain de pétanque ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762071002

Merci,
waterced (2022-08-22 08:37:03+00:00): Curieusement oui, c'est d'ailleurs plus pour la curiosité de la chose que la pertinence géographique que je l'avais relevé. Du moins c'est comme ça que j'avais interprété la surface plane gravillonnée encadrée de poutre, lorsque j'étais sur place. (visible également sur les vues aériennes)
PantherStrix (2020-01-10 15:31:40+00:00): Das Löschen der route_ref an den Haltestellen ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Gerade im ländlichen Raum sind die Buslinien nur unvollständig oder fehlerhaft gemappt. Durch hinzufügen der Buslinien, die an einer Haltestellen halten (= route_ref) gibt es einen signifikanten Zusatznutzen: 1. sieht man, welche Buslinien ggf. noch fehlen und ergänzt werden können/müssen. 2. erhält der Kartennutzer zumindest den Hinweis, dass mehrere Buslinien an der Haltestelle halten.

Ich sehe deine automatisierten (!) Änderungen im VBB-Bereich nach längerer "Beobachtung" als nicht sehr sinnvoll an und bin geneigt zukünftig häufiger deine Changesets zu reverten. Zumal du auch auf vorherige Anfragen keine plausiblen Erläuterungen zu den automatischen Änderungen gegeben hast.
Julian S (2021-02-19 17:41:02+00:00): Very late review, but, nicely done!

I bike through this roundabout frequently and had always thought about updating it from the previous intersection, which has been gone for several years now.

I just made some more changes to this that I think are correct (I'm no roundabout expert but have read through the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#The_roundabout_itself). Take a look in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99610358 and let me know what you think.

Thanks for getting this started!
l3BAM (2020-02-11 08:24:34+00:00): Bonjour. Je conteste cette affirmation péremptoire. Les communes nouvelles sont des lieux-dits bien délimités de même nature que les vieilles communes fusionnées depuis longtemps (en dehors de quelques subtilités temporaires du code électoral qui ne concerne pas OSM).
Gnafron (2020-02-12 08:47:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour moi, une commune nouvelle n’est pas un lieu-dit, dans le sens où la plupart de ces nœuds place ont été positionnés dans des endroits où il n’y a physiquement pas d’agglomération sur place. Il n’y a pas de village (zone agglomérée) portant le nom de la commune nouvelle la plupart du temps, mais plusieurs villages/anciennes communes formant une commune nouvelle, délimitée par une relation.
Qu’en pensez-vous ?
Cordialement,
andrewwiseman (2020-01-16 21:43:56+00:00): test
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79389740
user_5359 (2020-01-10 08:58:50+00:00): Hello! Please use mixcased characters for names (like addr:city).
!bm (2020-01-10 23:49:41+00:00): Hallo mardiz! Gemäß deinem Cs-Kommentar bietet sich doch eigentlich disused:* an – mag im konkreten Fall zwar kein allzu gravierender Unterschied sein, aber siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
– für dich gefixt in Cs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79438936 --besteGrüße!bm
Mark R Naird (2020-05-06 19:57:18+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84762162
pangoSE (2020-01-19 14:39:12+00:00): Could you please avoid worldwide changesets? see https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/79577457
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-24 08:40:19+00:00): Hi, units. I deleted the unnecessary roads (way 762093168, way 762093182, way 762093164, way 762093169, way 762093165, way 762093172, way 762093177). Please tell me if I'm wrong.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-24 08:40:18+00:00): Hi, units. I deleted the unnecessary roads (way 762093719, way 762093723, way 762093733, way way 762093726, way 762093722, way 762093727). Please tell me if I'm wrong.
mueschel (2020-01-10 10:30:06+00:00): Hi,
you added the tags 'VMI' and 'VMi' on 40 objects. What does that mean? It looks like a copy of the name of the operator that was added by mistake.
badincite (2020-01-10 13:31:46+00:00): I was using this for a query in another application that grabs building footprints. I added these a year ago and went to add the Training Center and it remove all my buildings. However I just realized someone added an operator with a Virginia Military Institute value I can use.
GinaroZ (2020-01-09 22:19:04+00:00): Thanks, I've added the building and pitch
user_5359 (2020-01-10 04:59:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! But the address was correct, or? Why did you delete this information?
GfxMarty (2020-01-10 10:16:27+00:00): As stated, I deleted a non existent business. It was my company that no longer exists.
GfxMarty (2020-01-10 10:17:29+00:00): It is also residential.
user_5359 (2020-01-10 10:21:55+00:00): You can delete your business, but not the address.
Supaplex (2020-01-14 03:37:04+00:00): Hi A404, 
This is Supaplex from DWG.
Could you explanin your edit? Someone complain your two editing. They think your edit was a problem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79393970
Polarbear (2020-01-17 20:12:39+00:00): Hi TXPeig, for churchyards, the better way to tag them is "landuse=religious" + "religion=christian".
user_5359 (2020-01-10 05:28:35+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte dass bei OSM die Beschreibung von Objekten die höchste Priorität hat. Objekte, die nur aus einem Namen bestehen, haben wenig Sinn. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)
Supaplex (2020-01-14 03:37:43+00:00): Hi A404, 
This is Supaplex from DWG.
Could you explanin your edit? Someone complain your two editing. They think your edit was a problem. If you think place=village is not properly, you can use landuse=residential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79394887
viloan (2020-01-09 22:37:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
keithonearth (2020-04-15 00:58:08+00:00): I've deleted this node, as I'm familiar with this intersection, and there is nothing here that I can see this node reasonably representing. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
ma-rt-in (2020-01-10 07:50:54+00:00): Hallo,
wie kommst es, das du der RB41 das network "Niedersachentarif" ergänzt hast? Für PT wird das network vorranig für die Verkehrsverbünde genutzt und nicht der geltende Tarifverbund.
vg
hybridOL (2020-01-11 13:51:28+00:00): Hi, ich habe mich an den übrigen Regionallinien im VBN-Bereich orientiert, die mit Niedersachsentarif oder Westfalentarif markiert sind: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HB/DE-HB-VBN-Analysis.html#considerednetworks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-18 12:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83739535 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the local community, reverting some selected mass deletion changesets near Athens.  See comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82728221 et al.
Samuele Battarra (2020-01-10 20:31:40+00:00): The change you made is not valid, in Italy addresses should not be putted on buildings.

Please revert it.
frosm (2020-01-09 23:07:12+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
si vous des nouveaux immeubles ont été construit à la place, n'hésitez pas à les ajouter, ême approximativement.
sinon le prochain contributeur regardant l'image sat va croire que les anciens batiments sont encore là et les re-rajoutera
bonne continuation
V MARTIN (2020-01-09 23:18:44+00:00): Ok, merci pour l'info! C'est fait!
user_5359 (2020-01-10 04:55:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
viloan (2020-01-09 23:24:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
hoserab (2020-01-10 23:15:08+00:00): Hello ksali,

You've deleted the access tunnels that I added about two years, which I'm personally not all that torn up about and don't really care if they're put back or not, but I want to caution you to be careful about deleting things off the map simply because "they should not be used for wayfinding" by virtue of being "inaccessible".

In this case the UofC campus service tunnels are perfectly accessible, just not to *you* or anyone else in the general public. But they do exist, and service personnel can and do use them. They were appropriately tagged with "access=private". If you were using some other piece of wayfinding software—using OSM data—was incorrectly suggesting the service tunnels that's on the developer of the software to fix, not to manipulate the OSM data to suit.

A longstanding policy of OSM is "don't tag for the renderer" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer), meaning in other words "don't manipulate OSM data to make it 'prettier' for someone or something else to use". The article at the OSMwiki gives a similar example to the UofC service tunnels: the tunnels at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in Switzerland. They're certainly not publicly accessible but they do exist and therefore are on the map (tagged as "access=private").

Again, I don't mean to be confrontational, but please don't just delete stuff off the map because it's not publicly accessible.

Cheers
user_5359 (2020-01-10 04:34:02+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo typo healthcare:specialty instead typo healthcare:speciality
Cheeto (2020-01-09 23:49:10+00:00): Are you auto-linting?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79396097
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-10-31 15:11:31+00:00): I've replaced "amenity=fridge" to amenity=recycling + recycling:food=yes

Please let me know if you have any concerns about it.
Admasawi (2020-01-17 01:43:42+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary Images
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 14:06:16+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164880994/history is another example of a questionable name source, since corrected.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 14:06:36+00:00): Привет,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164880994/history - еще один пример сомнительного источника имен, поскольку исправлено.
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди
Соел (2020-10-04 06:18:25+00:00): Good afternoon. My uncle asked me to name this street. Since he lives there. If this information is incorrect. Then delete the street name. And please unblock me.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-04 18:52:42+00:00): Thank you.

What about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141944627/history ?

Best Regards,
Andy
angys (2020-01-20 16:15:50+00:00): Hello, for Air Itam township centre iI think it should be primary, not tertiary.
Velocimaptor (2020-01-20 23:17:04+00:00): This change was based off of overall function of the road and the major decrease in usage that we experienced on the ground. It also creates a smooth transition between Jalan Paya Terubung and Jalan Stesen Bukit Bendera. What is your reasoning behind leaving it a Primary? I think that if you were to leave it a primary, it might make sense to continue where Jalan Paya Terubung is a primary and carry it all the way through to the north. I'll have to take a look at the imagery we gathered to see if that would be feasible or a good idea.
angys (2020-01-21 09:53:31+00:00): Ok, Iould lile to hera your team voice upon reviewed.
mueschel (2020-01-11 10:23:28+00:00): Hi,
the tags 'charge:monthly' and 'charge:daily' are not used up to now. This can be tagged in a single 'charge' tag:

charge = 10 USD/day; 100 USD/month

Could you have a look and change your tags?
Thanks!
Hans Thompson (2020-01-13 19:23:20+00:00): Yes! I will make those changes in the next 48 hours. Thanks.
viloan (2020-01-10 01:55:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
angys (2020-01-11 19:13:32+00:00): Please recheck Jalan KemaNgi (sounds weird)
nevw (2020-01-10 04:44:18+00:00): Please take more care with your business listings. I had to shift the business to correct location address, added primary tag, phone # format.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-13 04:15:20+00:00): hi tuanifan. apa kabar?
trust you as always. there is a crossing highway which attach to boundary administrative. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/762144501
20.8012408, 105.6885053
would you mind to check this way and advice some improvement?
its helpful and i appreciate that.

terimakasih
gecho111 (2020-01-10 06:28:40+00:00): No its not, it is permanently closed.
user_5359 (2020-01-10 05:24:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between name and description. A maze doesn't have the name Labyrinth. 
Likewise, we understand a maze to be a maze with walls, not a drawing on the floor for mental concentration (regardless of the significance).
Adamant1 (2020-01-11 01:05:37+00:00): "A maze doesn't have the name Labyrinth."

Hi there. I would say it does in the cases where that's the official name. Sometimes official names can be purely descriptive but still allowed. Going by their website that is what it is called. So, I'd think it would be OK to name it that. 

I agree its not really a maze or a labyrinth though, but that's more on the organize that considers it one when they shouldn't then the mapper adding the object. Perhaps you and I just aren't enlightened enough ;)

 https://www.csecenter.org/About/Tour-The-Grounds/The-Labyrinth
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-14 18:44:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108706113 ?
viloan (2020-01-10 04:20:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!