piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-21 23:44:45+00:00): Hola JohnLpz, por favor no te olvides de incluir el texto #osmpe-unmsm-comaru , de esta manera se pueden mantener las estadisticas del proyecto de mapeo.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
bxl-forever (2022-04-22 08:26:12+00:00): Hello,

If you want to change building outlines, please change the imagery and scroll down to AIV Flanders GRB.  Never trace buildings on aerial imagery.
(Aerial imagery is distorted, it is okay for roads or crossings but buildings, especially tall ones, will have funny shapes and positions if you do that.)

Hope this helps.
ZanthiaGG (2022-04-22 09:06:47+00:00): Thank you for the help, outline has been updated!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:41:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522445
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
olo81 (2022-04-26 15:03:34+00:00): Do wywalenia, nie mapujemy tymczasowych obiektów 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 07:03:12+00:00): oki
jeslop (2022-04-22 08:46:05+00:00): Hola Jacaranda. Bienvenido a OSM.

¿Cuál es el significado de todas esas siglas que pones en la etiqueta name? ¿Son realmente parte del nombre? ¿Es ese realmente el nombre del lugar?

Te recomiendo que leas estas dos páginas del wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Si puedes corrige las ediciones afectadas o también puedes pedir ayuda: 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
https://telegram.me/OSMes
https://telegram.me/OSMValencia

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
pitfire (2022-04-22 06:17:34+00:00): Hallo nib08,
Haus 152 gibt es nicht zweimal. Ist eine Erweiterung und bekommt keine eigene Adresse. Alternativ den Alten Umriss ändern.
pitfire (2022-04-22 06:31:29+00:00): Ist jetzt bereinigt.
Gruß pitfire.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
streckenkundler (2022-04-22 12:42:11+00:00): ... darauf hab ich gewartet, daß du es mit einem neuen Account erneut versuchst. Dieses CS wird gleich revertet: 1. wegen deinem erneuten F-Land-Versuch, 2. wegen highway=cycleway. Der Weg ist mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit NICHT mit Verkehrszeichen 237 ausgeschildert.

streckenkundler
Galbinus (2022-04-22 17:18:54+00:00): Das ist bestenfalls
landuse=garden + access=private,
also ein privater Garten. Aber sicherlich kein place=locality oder irgendwas anderes Offizielles.
user_15630563 (2022-04-23 10:32:10+00:00): an Streckenkundler:
Entschuldigung, ich habe erst vor ein paar Tagen hier bei OSM angefangen. Zu 1. : ich habe von F-Land mitbekommen  und dachte es wäre halt eine gute Idee dass auch auf OSM einzutragen.
Zu 2.: Achso. Habe ich verwechselt, ich dachte dass es bei einem Fahrradstraße Schild ebenfalls gild.
Gruß
streckenkundler (2022-04-23 11:21:34+00:00): Man versucht es also auf die Unschuldslamm-Tour.
zu 1: ich glaube das nicht. Ich habe dir in deiner vorherigen Inkarnation als "NaturAufnahmen" bereits geschrieben: OSM ist keine Malkarte OSM ist nicht dafür da, private F-Land-Spielereien  auszuleben. Dafür kannst du gerne https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/ und Co benutzen, da kannst du dich austoben. Auch dein neuerlicher F-Land-Versuch wird gleich revertet.
user_15630563 (2022-04-23 13:28:40+00:00): Entschuldigung, ich weiß nicht was sie mit Unschuldslamm-Tour meinen und wer ist Natur-Aufnahmen?
Außerdem, warum haben Sie meinen Eintrag gelöscht? Galbinus meinte doch ich könne es mit landuse=garten und access=No machen.
Ich habe noch eine Frage zu den Fahrradwegen: gilt also motorway=cicleway gar nicht Fahrradstraßen?
Gruß
Galbinus (2022-04-23 17:35:19+00:00): Ich hatte mich verschrieben: Es muss heißen: leisure=garden. Und nicht access=no sondern access=private

Und zu den Wegen auf diesem Privatgrundsück: Egal was da jemand daran schreibt, ob "Autobahn" oder "Fahrradweg" werden die noch lange nicht zu Autobahnen oder Fahrradwegen. Das sind alles höchstens "highway=path + access=private". 

Open Streetmap ist zwar ein Projekt, bei dem sich jeder beteiligen kann. Das bedeutet aber nicht, dass man dort sich die Landkarte so malen kann, wie man sie selbst gerne hätte. 

Es ist nicht üblich, Wege auf privaten Gartengrundstücken einzuzeichnen. Wenn man solche Wege dann trotzdem einzeichnen will, dann aber auf keinen Fall so, dass jemand denken könnte, da befinde sich tatsächlich eine "Fahrradstraße"... das wäre genauso Unsinn, wie eine Garteneisenbahn als Bahnlinie einzuzeichnen.
streckenkundler (2022-04-23 18:51:53+00:00): Ja, aber dann ohne name=F-Land. Das ist für mich "verbrannt". Realerweise kann/ sollte/ muß der gesamte Streifen bis zur Bahn als leisure=garden erfasst werden, vergleiche Luftbild. 
Bei solchen Namen am hw=path bin ich auch hier für Dinge im explizit privaten Bereich für einen strengeren, als toleranteren Weg.

Man muß immer Hinterkopf haben, daß wir an einer kostenfreien, allgemein verwendbaren Geodatenbasis arbeiten.  Da sollte man auch ein Stück weit verläßliche und nachvollziehbare Daten liefern können, ohne daß es in der Datennachverarbeitung plötzlich ein Land mit al=2 auftaucht, welches so nicht gibt und ein Hirngespinst ist.

Sven

Ansonsten meine Zustimmung. 

Sven
4004 (2022-04-23 23:51:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36964638 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=953084522105713&focus=photo может хоть оставлять точки угловых адресов?
4004 (2022-04-23 23:55:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281617069/history ???
matsumi (2022-04-24 15:39:44+00:00): По угловому адресу - вполне,  Исправил. Подгружу пакетом побольше.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=301994294709338&focus=photo&lat=53.678998100001&lng=23.834599900001&z=17&x=0.778672048385979&y=0.4032742769034679&zoom=0
По детскому садику:
Во-первых, по принципу построения реляционных баз данных любая информация в БД должна присутствовать только один раз. Здесь же группа тегов name присутствовала как на amenity, так и на building.
Во-вторых, при выборе правильного варианта привязки тегов name (к amenity или к building), привязка к building имеет очевидные преимущества, поскольку в данному случае место наследует адрес здания.
И, пользуясь случаем, хотел бы узнать Ваще мнение по поводу угловых адресов зданий по ул. Мицкевича 1 и 2 после переименования части улицы Максима Горького.
4004 (2022-04-24 16:10:41+00:00): спасибо, что угловой вернули, я так и не понял, почему стоило их удалять (не только про Кирова речь), вместо того, чтобы в точки переделать - старые адреса по горького на гаспадарчая висели годами, никому не мешали, наоборот - кто ищет по альтернативному адресу - найдет.

детские сады, так же как школы, мапятся вкривь и вкось, но основные постулаты, насколько помню: аменити на территорию, название на нее же.
про привязку и наследование логично, но все клиенты должны ожидать тегирование как по вики. тот же османд вполне умеет показать адрес здания детского сада при выборе полигона детского сада. ваш вариант идет вразрез с общей практикой.

по мицкевича, не видел нигде упоминания этих домов как меняющих адрес (хотя я и домов в пвт не видел, но вы где то узнали). хоть дома и угловые, не помню на них адресации по Горького (хотя не удивлюсь, если она есть).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Palolo (2022-05-14 22:06:20+00:00): Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Please work to trace buildings accurately. Use the q key to make square corners. Thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
DressyPear4 (2022-04-21 23:22:06+00:00): Olá, não faça grandes modificações principalmente em relações, não ignore avisos do editor obviamente algo deve estar pendente de revisão.
Aqui você adicionou o rio todo como uma tubulação na qual maior parte é céu aberto.
Adicione uma descrição ao enviar para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DressyPear4 (2022-04-21 23:22:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374074658
Geaquinto (2022-04-27 23:15:45+00:00): Por favor, se você é novato, não seja inconsequente. Tente contato com a comunidade porque somos razoavelmente organizados e gostamos de ajudar a esclarecer dúvidas de usuários novos. Temos um canal onde conversamos quase diariamente sobre OpenStreetMap no Rio: https://t.me/osmrj

Veja bem: você deletou estações de BRT, que são sistemas muito detalhados que dão muito trabalho para organizar e colocar informações nos mapas. Por isso, é bem provável que em alguns dias todo esse conjunto de mudanças será revertido. Não temos tempo e recursos humanos para verificar tudo profundamente. Por isso, até mesmo algumas modificações aparentemente positivas serão perdidas.

Você provavelmente teve um grande trabalho perdido. Para evitar que isso aconteça novamente, tente seguir o conselho de DressyPear4: não faça esse tipo de edição grande, em que as modificações não têm nada em comum.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-05-03 06:31:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please.
gecho111 (2022-04-24 00:40:33+00:00): Has construction started yet on any of what you added? Also Plains Court is wrong, that is a path park that does actually exist, but someone deleted the connection to Plains Blvd.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:49:53+00:00): thanks for the tip, I can correct if you need
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
lsssmmns (2022-04-21 23:48:56+00:00): #uclamapathon2022
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
flother (2022-04-25 20:51:51+00:00): Hi,

I hope you're enjoying your OpenStreetMap edits! One tip: you still need to include the highway=path tag for this to be routable — for example, to allow software to give walking directions along it. I've added it back in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120183440.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
lsssmmns (2022-04-21 23:49:02+00:00): #uclamapathon2022
Szymson (2022-04-24 07:39:45+00:00): To tak nie powinno wyglądać... Odcinkom "ślepym" mogłeś zmienić access=no i construction=service. Opisowe nazwy dróg typu "Przyszłe połączenie z OMT" również nie jest poprawnym rozwiązaniem. W ogóle łącznicom nie daje się raczej żadnych nazw.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
JoeMapsTheWorld (2022-04-21 23:00:28+00:00): To square a building, just right-click it and click the square in the selection

But why delete them