piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2022-06-14 05:31:10+00:00): Hello uplander.
This business is already mapped in the correct location one block over.
60th Street is not the same as 60th Lane.
In the future please pay attention where exactly you edit. If you see an already mapped building, perhaps think twice about overwriting its address.
Additionally, even if this was the right location, it is inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business which occupies just the ground floor. In such situations it must be mapped as separate node within the perimeter of that building.
As such this edit is going to be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122350307
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-06-16 09:50:18+00:00): Спасибо, что добавили тропу и загрузили gpx трек!
grzegorz75jan (2024-05-22 20:23:51+00:00): Witam.
Właśnie szperam po tym terenie.
Podsyłam parę fotek z wizji lokalnej stanu aktualnego
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AhGMc3MQZJqr8AunALoNaJFgzTzc?e=CUstTg

Co zrobić z tymi opuszczonymi budynkami które są na mapie i mają adresy.
Daj znać gdy obejrzysz te zdjęcia to je usunę by zwolnić miejsce.
mariotomo (2022-06-14 15:57:59+00:00): hi. I'm sure this was a random mistake, but please do try to improve these two points:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2022-06-15 08:51:11+00:00): Hello! Pleas have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/237763029. What is the meeaning of the misspelled access key?
mapsamillion78 (2022-06-16 01:18:12+00:00): Hi - thanks for spotting this - you are correct - [access=psv] was a typo and should not have been saved in my edits.

The tag I added [psv=yes] is the one I wanted! This is required to allow buses to reach the bus stop (and other psv vehicles enter the complex). Thanks again.
cyclist789 (2025-06-22 10:14:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069486985

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment

That is not how man_made=embankment is used. It should be placed at the *edge* of an embankment, (like a natural=cliff or a barrier=retaining_wall). But I don't know what to use instead.

I could draw a man_made=embankment all the way around it, or I could place a barrier=wall with material=soil. What do you think?
osmviborg (2025-06-22 10:41:40+00:00): Aner ikke hvordan man ellers skal tegne en jordvold. Der er mange af dem, landet rundt.
osmviborg (2025-06-22 10:55:46+00:00): barrier=berm er vist det bedste bud
cyclist789 (2025-06-24 09:28:52+00:00): Tak skal du have! Den vil jeg bruge.
Jrachi (2022-06-15 06:26:40+00:00): Ciao.Sai risolvere il problema d questa strada che non è collegata ad altre strade?
mikibux (2022-06-15 06:31:57+00:00): corretto l'errore, grazie della segnalazione
Jrachi (2022-06-15 06:52:53+00:00): Prego! Grazie a te per la solerzia.
Però adesso rimane la stranezza di una track con sac_scale=mountain_hiking.
Per quanto sia messa male una strada il grado di difficoltà dovrebbe essere hiking.
So che non hai inserito tu il tag, ma tu cambiando il tipo di highway dovresti controllare tutti i tag.
So che usando iD non è facile, ma almeno provaci!
Ancora grazie del lavoro che fai sul campo, e ciao.
mikibux (2022-06-15 07:06:36+00:00): ti ringrazio per l'aiuto, dovrei aver modificato in hiking. 
oggettivamente quel tratto da te indicato non sarebbe percorribile da nessun veicolo se non forse un quad. diciamo che è al limite tra strada non mantenuta e sentiero tant'è che va poi a morire in un sentiero.
ne approfitto per chiederti se sai aiutarmi nel scegliere tra hiking e mountain hiking. pensavo fosse solo una differenza di quota. se il sentiero si trova sopra i mille metri è mountain hiking sotto hiking. Ma probabilmente sbaglio. 
vedo sparsi qua e là, anche sopra i tremila metri di quota e anche verso vette non certo alla portata di tutti delle tracce o senza indicazione o con indicazione hiking. lo reputo non corretto.
ad esempio poi su Komoot vedi il sentiero con linea continua e può risultare ingannevole
Jrachi (2022-06-15 07:57:14+00:00): La sac-scale è pensata per indicare il grado di rischio di un sentiero.
muontain_hiking andrebbe sui sentieri che presentano un rischio sulla possibilità di caduta (rovinosa), per me un sentiero di mezzacosta o di versante su un tracciato ben visibile è sempre hiking quale sia la quota..
Quando si attraversa una pietraia è mountain_hiking. Se si deve mettere le mani diventa demanding_mountain_hiking.
I sentieri che richiedono un grado superiore (alpine ecc.) sono con difficoltà alpinistiche, con tracciato poco o per nulla visibile perché si cammina su roccia nuda.
Si tratta di valori molto soggettivi e possono essere diversi a seconda della capacità dell'escursionista.
Ci sono mappatori che valutano la sac_scale in base alla pendenza, valutazione solo in apparenza oggettiva.
La percorribilità di una track si indica con la tracktype: grade1 significa che ci puoi andare con i pattini a rotelle, grade5 ci vai solo con un robusto fuoristrada o con mezzi agricoli.
Per i sentieri mi piace indicare la trail_visibility, altra scala molto oggettiva e che può facilmente variare a seconda dell'altezza dell'erba o la presenza di foglie.
Ogni mappatore ha i suoi metri di giudizio e e discussioni sono spesso lunghe e tediose.
Anche il giudizio di un escursionista può essere molto diverso a seconda dell'esperienza e anche delle capacità del giorno in cui cammina!
Becky Candy (2022-06-15 09:19:33+00:00): Great work, thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122355084
Arnaud Champollion (2022-06-14 11:49:45+00:00): Des travaux en cours de remise en route de la ligne ? :)
Arnaud Champollion (2022-06-14 11:50:35+00:00): Désolé commentaire posté au mauvais endroit.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-17 12:25:46+00:00): Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825490585 looked a bit of a mess here after this edit.  I've reverted it to prior to 122327239 - hope things are OK now.
eteb3 (2022-06-14 06:52:08+00:00): Sources: 
Aerial imagery; Note 2225813
gscscnd (2022-06-14 07:24:31+00:00): 1. Relacja <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14250801> była zbędna, usunąłem.
2. Dodając tag maxspeed zawsze dodawaj tag maxspeed:type i/lub source:maxspeed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 12:38:53+00:00): name=永記專業檳榔攤
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069497324

shop=檳榔攤 ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

(if anyone wants I can provide list of weird shop values in some country/area - let me know if you are interested, some are already at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mateusz_Konieczny/unusual_shop_values )
mcliquid (2022-06-26 15:18:44+00:00): Du hast hier das Tagging nicht korrekt ausgeschrieben. Bitte hier etwas genauer drauf achten beim Hochladen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645872780/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
elsy1 (2022-06-14 11:40:11+00:00): سلام توضیحات زدید لاله ایستگاه اتوبوس ولی بیمارستان ثبت کردید میشه لطفا توضیح بدید تشکر
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-21 10:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122659154 where the changeset comment is: revert REPEATED undiscussed and buggy import in Tehran (DWG Ticket#2022060410000047)
booktiger (2022-06-14 09:56:06+00:00): 2035规划目前有很多尚未实施。旧的道路应该参考上一版规划或者根据道路断面去判断道路等级。否则的话很多极低等级的道路都可能提级。
rosschen (2022-06-14 10:01:32+00:00): 您说的有道理，没有提级改造的地区请退回。
喵耳引力波 (2022-06-18 17:24:03+00:00): Hey friend, I currently armchair mapping in EPFL and notice you add a bicycle parking area those days. It is W-E direction. According to iD Editor's background imegary "SWISSTOPO", a ortho-aerial imegary set provided by Federal Office, I guess this is the correct bicycle parking area (N-S direction): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071059243

Could you ensure that the W-E direction area is correct? (Because I'm from China and haven't ever visited Swiss, my mapping in EPFL is because I think this place beautiful) Thank you!
喵耳引力波 (2022-06-18 17:50:46+00:00): == THANK YOU==

I had a look at EPFL's aerial map and ensure that your edit is right, thank you! 

https://map.epfl.ch/?lang=en&dim_floor=0&dim_lang=en&baselayer_ref=background_ortho_grp&map_x=2532819&map_y=1152191&map_zoom=12.999952726543425&tree_groups=centres_nevralgiques%2Cacces%2Cmobilite_reduite%2Censeignement%2Ccommerces_et_services%2Cvehicules%2Cinfrastructure_plan_grp&tree_group_layers_centres_nevralgiques=information_epfl%2Cguichet_etudiants&tree_group_layers_acces=metro&tree_group_layers_mobilite_reduite=&tree_group_layers_enseignement=&tree_group_layers_commerces_et_services=&tree_group_layers_vehicules=&tree_group_layers_infrastructure_plan_grp=batiments_query_plan
喵耳引力波 (2022-06-18 18:12:15+00:00): == END OF ISSUE ==

I draw it back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122556149
PetitPrince (2022-06-18 18:36:18+00:00): As stated in the "created by" field I used the StreetComplete map, that more or less gamify the mapping experience, like Pokemon Go. I'm general the modification done by StreetComplete relies on "on the ground" observation, but are quite simplified compared to the ID editor. For me the bicycle park were already there in the app and wasn't looking too bad, and the app only prompted me to complete the information.
Becky Candy (2022-06-15 08:35:12+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122357496
alex_lofi (2022-06-14 09:14:51+00:00): Llevaba un tiempo pensando en añadir los terrenos de la vega ahora que he terminado los autobuses y creo que me voy a animar :D
mueschel (2022-06-16 09:57:00+00:00): Hallo,
üblicherweise wird die Breite von Radwegen nicht mit width:cycleway, sondern mit  cycleway:width angegeben.

Die Breite des Puffers ist einfach 
cycleway:buffer, nicht width:cycleway:buffer

Und: Vorsicht bei "oneway:bicycle" an Radwegen außerorts! Das erlaubt Mofas in der Gegenrichtung. "oneway=yes" ist ausreichend, weil es sich nur auf Fahrzeuge nicht auf Fußgänger bezieht.

Grüße
Jan
hadhuey (2022-06-16 16:30:31+00:00): Hallo Jan,
Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit hier eine Diskussion, bei der mir erklärt wurde dass ich das nicht, bzw. ausschließlich an Straßen für das Konzept der Einlinienkartierung so nutzen dürfte. Daraufhin hab ich es so geändert. 

Ich finde cycleway:width auch logischer.

Theoretisch dürfte der Fall mit oneway:bicycle außerorts nicht auftreten. Auf cycleways sollte sowieso immer nur oneway stehen.
Nur bei Wegen mit Mehrfachnutzung müssen wir etwas genauer hinschauen, wie sie beschildert sind.
Grüße
mueschel (2022-06-16 16:48:31+00:00): "cycleway=" und "sidewalk=" sollten wirklich nur an Straßen verwendet werden, nicht für eigene Fuß/Radwege. 

Ich persönlich fände es aber trotzdem in Ordnung, für die Details die gleichen detailierten Tags wie cycleway:width zu verwenden.

Du kannst das Problem umgehen indem du diese eigenständigen Wege mit "xyz:lanes" komplett beschreibst:

foot:lanes = no | designated
bicycle:lanes = designated | no
width:lanes = 2.5 | 2
etc.

Damit hättest du dann auch gleich noch die Anordnung der beiden Teile erfasst, was sonst nicht umbedingt klar ist.
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-21 10:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122659154 where the changeset comment is: revert REPEATED undiscussed and buggy import in Tehran (DWG Ticket#2022060410000047)
Mannivu (2022-06-14 10:52:04+00:00): This seems wrong. Have you ever been here to say that's a path and not a track? Because that clearly looks like a track from aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122359035
Hill_Risso (2022-06-16 07:42:35+00:00): Hi Mannivu, thanks for modifying the data. I had changed the track to a path to fix the data inconsistency.
AmanBD (2022-07-13 15:56:47+00:00): This is a regional highway which should be classified as primary.

For more details, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Tagging_Standard_for_Bangladesh
emersonveenstra (2022-06-14 10:37:20+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove the highway=track tag?
anap_telenav (2022-06-16 05:14:41+00:00): sorry, I wanted to delete another tag not that one, I put it back
bxl-forever (2022-06-15 18:20:18+00:00): Hello,

Is this change based on a field survey?
It raises a few issues.

1) You deleted the repair station in Woluwe here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8972946744/history
On this Mapillary picture, taken hardly one month ago, it was still there: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=166245279137004

2) You deleted the one in Docks Bruxsel here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6329699865/history
I recall seeing it earlier this year, probably in January.

Of course, those devices might have been removed recently, but a group of changes for 6 different parts several kilometers apart, the same day, and for one specific kind of object and nothing else, inevitably looks a bit suspicious from the outside.  We would appreciate if you would be kind enough to explain how this information was obtained.

That being said, if you are surveying cycle-friendly devices, that could be really helpful to keep the map up to date.

Have a nice day.
Pierre Raeymaekers (2022-06-15 21:04:53+00:00): Hi,

Yes it comes from direct field experience, I can prove it by sending you my trip record from that day in Samsung Health.

On my way home from work i was looking for a pump to fill up my tires, so I gave this map a try, almost all points I tested where missing or vandalized, I finally found one spot that was in order at Place Loix in Saint-Gilles.  

Sorry to say, the map is absolutely out of date, I am cycling a lot troughout Brussels, more than 3 out of four cyclo fix stations are vandalized.  

In most casses regarding pumps, the head of the pump that fits on the wheel is cut off.

So in order to help, I will try to go check as much spots as I can during my days of, trying to get the map a little more up to date.
bxl-forever (2022-06-15 21:10:10+00:00): Thanks for replying.  That’s perfect, then, and your next contributions will be welcome; we always need more eyes to look for recent changes like this.  (I admit I rarely care to inspect them in detail when passing by, and this is quite useful.)
emersonveenstra (2022-06-14 10:30:20+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove the highway=track tag? This is a track to the lake to the north
anap_telenav (2022-06-16 05:12:18+00:00): sorry, I wanted to delete a different tag, not the highway=track.  I put it back.
Leo Slager (2022-06-14 12:55:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2022-06-14 12:57:22+00:00): Dag Nick,

Alle begin is moeilijk.
Tijdelijke gebeurtenissen en persoonlijke aantekeningen horen niet thuis op de kaart.
Ik zal je bijdrage weer verwijderen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 08:24:54+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5308904 ?

Czy ta budowa jest fikcyjna?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 16:49:29+00:00): proszę, odpowiedz na to pytanie i każde inną sprawę pozostającą nierozwiązaną na https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6353007
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:24:41+00:00): -
abakus_uploader (2022-06-14 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
andrewsuzuki (2022-07-31 05:01:47+00:00): Sorry to bother, but another note: unpaved tracks generally shouldn't be tagged with tracktype=grade1 (as you did with way 1069517914). See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
tordans (2022-06-14 08:58:58+00:00): 🦅❤️
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122360604
Lostmonkey (2023-05-03 14:44:24+00:00): Ana Frugt og Grønt er endnu et eksempel på oprettelse af en dublet på samme placering (har nu slettet den originale). Måske det nogle gange går lige lovligt hurtigt med disse fvst-opdateringer?
Lejun (2022-06-16 07:11:09+00:00): Tout semble correct, merci de la contrib’ !
Lejun (2022-06-16 07:11:05+00:00): Tout semble correct, merci de la contrib’ !
user_2066394 (2022-06-14 12:30:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
user4816003805 (2022-06-18 03:38:00+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM!
For the kindergarten you added, there's a couple formatting issues in the tags, which will make it harder to find.
"addr:street" refers only to the street name. You should use "addr:street=40th Avenue" and "addr:housenumber=710" instead of "addr:street=710 40th Ave".
The "opening_hours" tag is also incorrectly formatted, which means many map renderers will ignore it. It should instead read "opening_hours=Mo-Fr 8:00-18:00".
user_5359 (2022-06-15 09:12:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1069545550 (one of twenty two ways). What is the meaning of the tags
CODE_HYDRO = 01C0000002000812959
DATE_CREAT = 2017-01-24 16:06:18
DATE_MAJ = 2021-09-01 22:04:22
ID = COURDEAU0000002000812959
IMPORTANCE = 5
STATUT = ValidÃ©
STATUT_TOP = CollectÃ©
TOPONYME = Ruisseau de la ChaudiÃ¨re
?
user_5359 (2022-06-18 07:00:53+00:00): Bonjour ! Jetez un coup d'œil sur http://www.osm.org/way/1069545550 (une des vingt-deux façons). Quelle est la signification des balises 
CODE_HYDRO = 01C0000002000812959
DATE_CREAT = 2017-01-24 16:06:18
DATE_MAJ = 2021-09-01 22:04:22
ID = COURDEAU0000002000812959
IMPORTANCE = 5
STATUT = ValidÃ©
STATUT_TOP = CollectÃ©
TOPONYME = Ruisseau de la ChaudiÃ¨re
?
m-ezd (2022-07-10 15:38:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Les voies de bus coté sud-ouest du pont Simone-Veil sont-elles vraiment pour des bus guidés ou est-ce simplement des voies réservées aux bus ?
Le_Viv_33 (2022-07-12 08:13:06+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, ce sont des voiries classiques, mais réservées aux bus. 
J'ai modifié avec 
busway=lane
Lejun (2022-06-16 06:31:26+00:00): Pas de soucis à priori, tout est bon
Lejun (2022-06-16 08:17:34+00:00): Salut et merci de la contribution. Attention, je crois voir une virgule manquante sur les heures d’ouvertures entre les deux plages horaires.
Vincent3000 (2022-06-16 08:35:10+00:00): Bien vu ! Merci de la vérification.
SHARCRASH (2022-08-29 12:15:46+00:00): Salut T! :) As you know I've done a tour  last Thursday in this region. On your CS :
- on v2 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026386742 you lifecycled this path with the prefix "abandoned:" but i still found it. To be fair, it is faint from the top because of the leaves (but this happens ever year after Fall season) but still recognizable mid way with erosion between the grasses. As extra sources, you could have helped yourself with the LIDAR and Heatmap's data showing some light GPS traces. On your activity, I remember you photographed rather the hollow way instead of this path. Is that maybe what you thought to be the path? My photos:
from top https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JIW-duwXIQj40W7BYGWE04of6ECzAqxq
and bottom + mid way
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FH1xJTdwqMEUI9-mlkiLgxayW5eRCNcX

- on v2 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026386741 you tagged this track with access=no whereas there is nothing that forbids anyone to use it and it is clearly visible (2 trails). So here I can't understand your tagging even though you had put a note saying "seems abandoned but didn't get evidence". It is obviously not abandoned or tell me what do you mean by "abandoned". Surely not every month forestry vehicles pass over every track and refresh the erosion, possibly even every year for the lowest levels of unpaved tracks, i mean which are left natural, so yeah they can be "délaissés" but they will surely be reused depending of the kind of user. If you didn't get evidence it is abandoned, then no need to point that out and add access=no. Photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EVtjTslvh80c8IysChNAla7Sw7_XYyHo

Because of these I would like to understand the reasons of your edits. 

I think you realize that not all tracks are of the same level of infrastructure, some are kept natural to keep land antural and make sure that the ground is not too impacted by human exploitation. On these it is normal that nature dominates back with grasses or little shrubs but the ways will be reused, though with less chances if you hide them in OSM. Naturally, the grade4 can later become grade5 and these last can become either a path if some pedestrians, cyclists, horses still use it while some shrubs have grown in the mean time and restrict passage to big vehicles, or of course disappear (abandoned in terms of OSM's lifecyle prefix) because of high grasses, shrubs, trees and other obstacles concealing/restricting the way. 

I could go on and explain you my vision of ways in nature but I'd write a book, don't want to take too much of your time. LOL :) Good day and safe ride!
mueschel (2022-06-15 18:40:08+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits of recycling containers. They got several strange tags like this:
recycling:tout_type_de_verre_(cristal = yes
muralito (2022-06-20 00:19:39+00:00): Hola. estas confundiando la playa chihuahua, con el centro poblado. Lo nudista es la playa, pero etiquestaste el centro poblado como nudista, que no es asi.
ivanbranco (2022-07-04 18:09:03+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo, 

io lascerei separate area residenziale e sezione elettorale.

Mapperei la sezione elettorale separatamente con boundary=political
Jakka (2022-06-16 11:09:14+00:00): Ce bat. est toujours la . Pas démolit ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687053198
PTH33 (2022-06-16 12:23:23+00:00): Oui, il s'agit d'un site classé par la région wallonne. Seul les tours de puit n°2 et n°3 ont été détruites. Actuellement, les bâtiments sont en rénovation par la SPI et par la société Matexi pour en faire des bureaux et des espaces de loisirs
Jakka (2022-06-16 12:29:31+00:00): Pour les bâtiment en rénovation ajoute building=yes et pour les tour détruite rased:building=tower ? Il ne sont plus visible en realité ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234417467
PTH33 (2022-06-16 12:56:43+00:00): Bien sûr que si, ils sont visibles. Ils tiennent toujours. J'ai ajouté l'emplacement du puit (et ancienne tour) détruite mais ce qui est encadré (dont la tour Malakoff) ici existe toujours.