piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaveF (2018-08-19 23:41:19+00:00): I believe i was the one who changed rel 28934 to natural=water back in ver 39/40. There was a Tagging discussion a few years ago. It ties in better with other water bodies making it easier to collate water related entities. The wiki indicates it as an alternative: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank#How_to_map.

The problem is that daModdin has deleted many 'outers' from this relation & then created a new one (8405045) to replace them but didn't transfer any of the 'inners' from 28934. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/28934

I have just deleted 8405045 as it consisted of just two outers. I'll reinsert the deleted outers into 28934 & hopefully everything will render appropriately.
user_5359 (2018-06-24 06:12:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
viloan (2018-06-23 23:40:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-06-24 13:55:22+00:00): Hi,
tags like "fut_ref_1" are not common. You could use "proposed:ref = I-69;IN 37" instead.

Cheers, Jan
kasmar00 (2018-06-28 08:02:31+00:00): Hi, did you mean to tag that the parking is bus only? It's already tagged with bus=yes, I don't think adding a Japanese name is a good idea.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-24 03:56:39+00:00): Found the split in the curve to the new name.  Also found the extension.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60110535
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 09:13:42+00:00): Hi basswow,
Thanks for helping with OpenStreetMap. I'm writing because you asked for a review.
I understand that this building is occupied by more than one company. For that situation another approach is common, and more clear. 
Instead of adding the name to the building, I advise the following approach.
- remove the names from the building outlines completely, but leave the general information like address
- add one node for the fitness centre at it's approximate position within the building outline, and include all specific info (phone, website, opening hours, etc.)
- add another node for the Baumanagement firm with its specific info
Address data is not required in the nodes, since data users (for example navigation apps) will be able to derive it because the node is within a building that already has that info. This saves you work and and is less error prone.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask them.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
viloan (2018-06-24 01:23:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jzel (2018-06-24 01:59:37+00:00): Retificando. Fixado trajeto completo da Rua Miguel Couto.
LeifRasmussen (2018-11-30 13:40:14+00:00): The amount of wood you are adding is amazing! It is super high resolution, and does not overlap with roads.  Nice job! 
I have also been adding wood in Chapel Hill, NC, but have not yet added as much as you.
Leif Rasmussen
sannkc (2018-12-02 23:08:12+00:00): Thanks! I sometimes overlap the minor roads, but try to avoid overlap with the major roads. Have fun mapping Chapel Hill!
mueschel (2018-06-24 14:59:41+00:00): Hi,
these edits on ~100 stores look a lot like an edit for SEO. 
You're introducing many new tags, don't add any source of the information.
Please spend some time to change all these POIs to use common tags like they are described in the Wiki.
freebeer (2018-06-27 08:27:26+00:00): also, what do the fields like copyrights=AAP and google_id have to do with the OSM requirements for non-encumbered data?
It seems the source of the data is tainted or not allowable, and here I would suggest a revert to v2, considering I could not find useful licence info about mapk.in with a google text search, and this seems to be a dump from that database.
cat_crash (2018-06-27 11:02:03+00:00): Why you have decided that it is encumbered data?
mueschel (2018-06-30 10:29:28+00:00): - The source you added is not a valid URL, we can not check it.
- You added a "copyrights" tag, which implies non-conformity with ODbL
- most of the tags you added do not follow any established tagging schemes

There are at least 16 shops that should be reverted in my opinion. The information itself might be useful, but only if it is added using documented tags and not using any suspicious source.
cat_crash (2018-07-04 13:33:23+00:00): 1) any references how "validation" process looks like? Actualy I'm owner of mentioned mapk.in resource 
2) I do. 
3) All non-compliant tags were removed in next update 
Any other concerns?
viloan (2018-06-24 02:40:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
RoundCircle (2018-07-04 05:32:31+00:00): G'day Cleary,


I recently began importing the Australian marine parks and noticed that you have made a start as well!


Unfortunately, the CAPAD 2016 data is out of date because new management plans began for almost all commonwealth reserves on the 1st of this month. Most importantly:


*"Commonwealth Marine Reserves" are now called "Marine Parks".
*Outer boundaries are unchanged, but there have been a lot of internal zoning changes (i.e. Sanctuary Zone, etc).


But don't worry, I have already updated your contributions as part of my import progress.
RoundCircle (2018-07-04 06:04:14+00:00): And just to clarify my methods,


I have not included the zoning of the reserves in my imports for a few reasons:


*It's not in CAPAD! (yet).
*A single marine park is more straightforward for OSM users.
*I am using Wikidata tags which reference the reserve as a whole (this is not a limitation, but mostly because of the following points:)
*I would argue that the zones are not distinct entities of the marine park.
*Easier to import and manage.
Regards,
Lee
RoundCircle (2018-07-04 06:16:06+00:00): Oh bugger, I commented on the wrong changeset.
I was explaining my reasoning for the Commonwealth reserves only.
TheSwavu (2018-07-04 06:25:24+00:00): Please stop importing any more of this data. We only have permission from DoEE to use the CAPAD datasets. We do not have permission to use any of their other data sets. This will have to wait till 2019 when the CAPAD2018 gets released.

Also please stop importing anything else without discussing it on the mail list first:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au This is not only polite it also required under the import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Thank you.
RoundCircle (2018-07-04 07:04:16+00:00): Just to clarify this is CAPAD 2016 data, with names extrapolated from the review.
cleary (2018-07-04 10:02:44+00:00): I think TheSwavu's point still stands. As far as I know we don't yet have permission to use any data, including  names, from your new source. Some of the data in OSM quickly  becomes obsolete and one of the merits of OSM is the ability to update it quickly - as long as it is from permitted sources.

In regard to the zones in marine parks, they are mapped separately in CAPAD and I think that, if we use a source, we should be accurate especially as there are different uses permitted and different levels of protection in zones. We wouldn't map a large area such as a city and omit suburb divisions and suggest that was better for users of the map. Generally the better the detail in a map, the more useful it is.
RoundCircle (2018-07-04 11:16:36+00:00): I have continued the discussion in the mailing list.
Regards,
Lee
Warin61 (2019-02-08 23:44:32+00:00): Hi,
The relation for Montebello Islands Marine Park (Southern Montebellos Sanctuary Zone) was not closed. I have closed it using the boundary for Montebello Islands Marine Park (General Use Zone). I used what is in OSM, no reference to anything else. Hopefully when the next release occurs this all gets refreshed.
cleary (2019-02-09 04:59:29+00:00): Good work. Thank you.
nevw (2018-06-26 02:56:25+00:00): Hi
there appears to be an error here.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.27881&lat=-26.95733&zoom=8
nevw (2018-06-26 02:57:33+00:00): ...a better view
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.05976&lat=-27.53488&zoom=18
3WhiskeredCat3 (2018-06-26 05:04:13+00:00): Hi nevw,

Thanks heaps for your feedback and for the views of the geometry clash, I have edited the building using a different perspective and hopefully have resolved any issues.
muralito (2018-06-25 03:07:27+00:00): La ruta entera tiene mapeada máxima 100. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293807692

De donde a donde va el tramo de 40 que controla el radar que agregaste?
muralito (2018-07-05 21:32:03+00:00): Hola Agus.

¿Se justifica subir a de secondary a primary la RP7 cuando al tener autopista cerca solo se usaría para trafico de cercanía?
AgusQui (2018-07-05 22:05:16+00:00): Si claro, es avenida troncal, si bien casi nadie la usa para ir de punta a punta, a menos que vayas a la peregrinación de Luján ja, se usa mucho para ir de ciudad en ciudad.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-06-24 05:16:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
fmarier (2018-07-10 22:16:59+00:00): That restaurant is actually on the other side of the street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3947247519

I have removed the duplicate entry.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
seav (2018-06-28 15:06:31+00:00): Hi!

Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!

May I confirm what type of businesses you have added? You have marked them as tourism=artwork which is for sculptures, murals, and other pieces of public art, and not for printing services.
maciek-szn (2018-06-24 06:50:01+00:00): Przestań zmieniać ten węzeł autostradowy!
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:20:42+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mbethke (2018-06-24 12:55:07+00:00): Hola Juan Pablo,
si realmente hay un mercado allí en el medio de la carretera grande, es un amenity=marketplace.

saludos,
Matthias
Wulf4096 (2018-11-13 17:44:26+00:00): Hallo NevermindMe,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25744865 geht bis in die Hamburger Straße rein. Da liegen nun also zwei Straßen übereinander. Magst da bitte nochmal nachbessern? Danke!
NevermindMe (2018-11-13 21:14:19+00:00): Moin Wulf4096! Ich hoffe so ist es in Ordnung?

Liebe Grüße
Wulf4096 (2018-11-13 22:05:56+00:00): So sieht's besser aus!
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:32:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
DaveF (2018-08-19 22:32:12+00:00): Hi 
Please don't add tags to the ways of Multipolygon relations. The required tags are within the relation please read up on them in the wiki
Please use more specific changeset comments than 'Added details'
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 04:22:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101009515/history has roof = round that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=round was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].