piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aharvey (2020-09-10 06:08:04+00:00): Has something changed since https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Gjkbkk-WQf278ulkiRBcow? I can't see anything on the imagery which would restrict cars, only a turn restriction where Walumetta Drive reaches Gas Works Road (those turn restrictions can be mapped separately).

Specifically what on the ground is restricting use by motor vehicles?
northberg (2020-09-14 11:56:31+00:00): It is quite hard (almost impossible) to see on mapillary, the lower sign above the Bush Turkeys says "No Through Route" https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9581cC0dvQf_GZglSL5F0g
Also cars coming from both direction on Gas Works Road are not allowed to turn into Walumetta Drive (turn restriction signs). This would result in the lower half of Walumetta Drive being open for cars from residents/visitors (and in one direction) only .
aharvey (2020-09-18 14:11:02+00:00): Okay thanks for the explanation. However in that case motor_vehicle=no is not correct because it blocks even residents from access. For no through routes the documented way to may this is with the destination access value, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values ie. motor_vehicle=destination. I've updated the tag based on this.

I've also added the turn restrictions as I could see from Mapillary and as you've indicated here at the Gas Works Road end.
northberg (2020-09-20 00:19:13+00:00): Thanks for updating (as well as explaing)!
This sounds good. 
However one more question: When I try to test it and calculate a route for driving a car e.g. McKye Street to Bridge End, it still suggests taking Walumetta Drive, although it shouldn't, right?
aharvey (2020-09-21 12:47:20+00:00): Probably the hosted routing engines didn't update. When I tested now with the GraphHopper hosted router on osm.org it avoids routing through Walumetta Drive, but will route through it if the end point is along it (which is how it should work for destination).
OSRM hosted by FOSSGIS might not have updated, or it might not handle destination correctly.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-07-26 09:27:34+00:00): one of the turn restrictions was wrong, which i fixed

what the signs are trying to enforce is that this entire block is "local traffic only" (G9-40-1). I guess that sign didn't exist back when they built this road, which is presumably why used G9-18 instead.

so anyway, i added motor_vehicle=destination to this block of streets
user_5359 (2020-09-10 03:47:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved five(!) nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding ways. I have moved the points back to the original positions.
Chris Fleming (2020-09-11 22:28:11+00:00): Hi just want to check this change, according to this - https://www.falkirkcommunitytrust.org/venues/callendar-park/ the previous spelling is correct?
Chris Fleming (2020-09-14 09:02:44+00:00): Hi,  I've not heard back from you. I've done some investigation and I can't find any indication that the previous spelling was wrong so I'm going to set it back.
GinaroZ (2020-09-14 11:09:55+00:00): Thanks, I sent them a message as well a few days ago but no reply.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 20:58:42+00:00): Would it be fine to mark https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7891559299/history as shop=equestrian ?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-17 21:14:48+00:00): Yes no problem! There does not seem to be any information in the wiki on shop=horseback and shop=equestrian
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 21:35:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dequestrian is documented
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-17 22:26:15+00:00): Oh, I see, thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 22:28:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop?uselang=en lists only the most popular ones

searching by value at taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values works fairly well
naveenpf (2020-09-15 18:01:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90668868
sannkc (2020-09-13 02:01:26+00:00): Hi,
Is there a particular reason for changing this stretch of The Paseo to primary?  To me, primary seems like a stretch based on the official state/county functional classifications and traffic counts.  MODOT data shows traffic counts of less than 5,000 per day, whereas OSM recommends daily traffic counts of more than 100,000 for urban primary roads that aren't numbered US/state highways.
Frans S (2020-09-10 08:44:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90669170
Axltrain (2020-10-08 02:56:43+00:00): Level Crossing removal for Ferguson Street hasn't left planning yet. 
https://levelcrossings.vic.gov.au/projects/ferguson-street-williamstown
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-06-09 03:42:27+00:00): Hi, AlejandroAlba. I deleted this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/845877755), I think it's not visible on the Imagery (Maxar Premium Imagery and Bing). Thank you, happy mapping :)
literan (2020-09-10 16:14:21+00:00): а зачем вы тут https://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=10&ll=37.500799219909624%2C55.60329054192597&pp=37.5008001502592%2C55.6032893220906&pa=366.1 ставите две опоры ЛЭП рядом, если она там одна (и другие соседние тоже)

https://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=10&ll=37.500799219909624%2C55.60329054192597&pp=37.5008001502592%2C55.6032893220906&pa=366.1

Верну обратно
stargunru (2020-09-10 17:35:31+00:00): Это для корректного отображения линий на https://frexosm.ru/power
Но если нельзя - то ладно
literan (2020-09-10 20:19:04+00:00): правки под рендер запрещены, да: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.81.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B4.D0.BB.D1.8F_.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.81.D0.BE.D1.82.D1.8B_.28.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B4.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.29
skfd (2020-09-10 10:28:39+00:00): Привет! Когда улицы переименовуют старое название нужно переносить в old_name, old_name:en и тд
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90669608
Frans S (2020-09-10 08:15:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
You mapped 3 buildings here.. None of them properly squared.
The one on top is not a building. It misses the shadow that prooves it's above ground level. For me it seems a courtyard and a road.
The middle one is a building indeed, but you forgot to square it.
The mapping of the  lowest building is oversized. you collected 2 buildings, a parking place and called it 1 building. 

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90669641
iandees (2020-09-10 16:06:39+00:00): These buildings were already here. There's no reason to add them again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90669674
user_8466505 (2020-09-10 02:28:58+00:00): Hey there! I wanted to let you know that if you want help with labeling, you can join the OpenStreetMap Slack and join #tagging. On there, our friendly mappers will help you find the correct tag for whatever you need! Join here: https://osmus.slack.com/
naveenpf (2020-09-15 18:01:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90670620
user_5359 (2020-09-10 03:25:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
vt100 (2020-11-09 18:11:08+00:00): Hi there, Hubminer!
Thanks for your additions to OSM. Care to take a look into the shop tags of this changeset? I guess you mispasted the addr:city part into shop=*.

Cheers,
Peter
naveenpf (2020-09-15 18:01:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90672373
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-03 18:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91911728 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90956156 , reverting some more changesets in which Google was used as a source..
aharvey (2020-09-10 05:58:17+00:00): hi you renamed the street to Grazier Road but the buildings you added you still set addr:street to Frazier Way?
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2020-09-10 04:21:50+00:00): Pokemon Go spam returns once again, and now removed
PT-53 (2020-09-10 06:58:24+00:00): Hallo apr2063,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25898357/history
von path auf cycleway abgeändert. Warum?
Wenn dort Fußgänger und Radfahrer erlaubt sind ist path und nicht cycleway die korrekte Klassifikation gem. OSM-Wiki.
Cycleway:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
Path:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90494968

Nimmst Du Deine Änderung wieder zurück?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-13 06:08:10+00:00): Ich habe Deine Änderung von path auf cycleway zurückgesetzt.
PT-53 (2021-01-10 07:19:17+00:00): Hallo apr2063, 
hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97227776#map=19/48.18366/10.09659
gibt es Hinweise zu dem von Dir eingezeichneten Modellflugplatz.
user_5359 (2020-09-10 16:11:06+00:00): Hello! Please use building=yes instead build=yes.
tkoval83 (2020-09-10 09:55:14+00:00): Hi, so what was broken there? Just curious.
tkoval83 (2020-09-10 09:55:48+00:00): Also can you rename Kiew to Kyiv?
aceman444 (2020-10-29 20:52:44+00:00): Zdravim, ake ze je toto odpocivadlo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504690844 ? Su tam nejake sluzby ci zariadenia, ci je to znacene dopravnou znackou ako odpocivadlo? Nie je to len obycajne parkovisko?
som-tam (2023-04-27 19:26:44+00:00): Interessantes Mapping mit dem area:highway (way: 641301876), aber sollte es nicht dem Typ der Straße entsprechen? Die ist allerdings auch nicht durchgängig gleich.
francwalter (2023-04-27 19:48:23+00:00): Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2342130
user_14250389 (2021-11-07 07:28:07+00:00): 您好，我是大陆的编辑者，最近在浏览北京周边以及中国的标注规范，注意到燕郊镇的边界非常零碎，有一些小线区，如：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704301626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704301621
这个镇由您最后编辑，所以希望您能解释一下这种零碎边界之成因，感谢！
CENTRALHUB (2021-11-07 08:32:09+00:00): 这些并不是我加上去的。我也几乎没有编辑过燕郊镇的边界。Thx.
Lepuse (2021-11-10 17:09:01+00:00): 原燕郊镇的城市化地区析置了街道管辖，而城中遗留的村落辖权未变更，仍由现燕郊镇管辖。
naveenpf (2020-09-15 18:01:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90678240
Glassman (2020-09-11 13:20:51+00:00): I think you wanted highway=path instead of footway. Footway is British English for sidewalk. Path is basically a trail. My guess is this isn't a wide smooth route to the glaciers. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90678712
Stas Sukhanov (2020-09-12 06:06:44+00:00): Hey Glassman, thank you for review and feedback. Fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90678712
venkat7778 (2020-09-12 08:24:18+00:00): According to the recent stats, Python is the best programming language opt by many industry experts in the IT world. It is considered as the most suitable programming language in many IT platforms. These platforms includes  Machine learning, Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and so on. Polywebservices provides the best knowledge on python programming by live industry experts through online. This python online training course enhances the career for both freshers as well as IT professionals.

 Python online training trainers initiate the course with the basics of python programming. And then the trainer moves with the essentials of Python programming and then moves with advanced concepts like socket programming and so on.  Moreover, the learners will acquire hands-on experience in python programming and its applications in different platforms with live examples. The main motto of this python course is to impart practical knowledge on python programming. This practical knowledge makes you master in python programming and clear the python certification
DD1GJ (2020-09-10 06:40:07+00:00): Your worldwide vandalism has been completely reverted.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:41:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90679721
Geo-Tobi (2024-05-04 15:05:19+00:00): Das ist merkwürdig. Da wurde motor_vehicle, motorcar und motorcycle gemeinsam eingetragen, aber mit unterschiedlichen Werten. Das kann aus meiner Sicht nicht stimmen.
Biker69 (2024-05-04 15:11:07+00:00): Die Isarstraße ist eine Privatstraße (mit Schlagbaum), der außerhalb der Zeiten des Kieswerks heruntergelassen ist. Jeder andere kann sich aber auch der Straße fortbewegen.
eggie (2022-03-22 07:28:24+00:00): Dag FM..

Zou hier maxweight van toepassing zijn?
Zie discussie hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118763458

MVG
eggie
FM2441 (2022-03-22 17:21:06+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

ik denk dart ik een fout gemaakt heb. De doorrijhoogte moet 3,5m zijn en niet het gewicht.
Excuses.
eggie (2022-03-22 18:15:09+00:00): Oke... no problem.. bedankt voor je reactie.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-03-22 18:20:11+00:00): maxweight verwijderd
gr eggie
jfd553 (2023-03-24 18:04:33+00:00): way 845944238 and 598352848 have following tags:

highway=path
piste:difficulty=intermediate
piste:oneway=no
piste:type=nordic
route=piste

I'm from the area and I do not know any formal nordic/cross country ski trail there.  I will remove these tags unless you prove me wrong. 

There are hundreds of Km of foot trails/highways, not maintained in winter, that can be used as informal ski trails. They could all be tagged the same, but nobody will maintain such information these informal trails. 

Thank for confirming :-)
gscholz (2023-03-25 06:24:46+00:00): Hi jfd553 ,
you may like to direct this question/comment to the original author of the respective way and not to someone who fixes errors like overlapping ways.
Kind regards
Guido
jfd553 (2023-03-25 13:52:54+00:00): My apologies. I used JOSM's history query to find the author of the first version of the ways. If it is not you, have you any idea on how to find him/her?
gscholz (2023-03-25 14:19:55+00:00): Hi jfd553 ,
I like to use achavi for this purpose:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90682123

If you hover your mouse over the respective ways you can see what has changed. If a way is split there is a new version 1 but the other (older) part will get an increased version number as well. So after some training this is not too difficult to get the real history. 
Guido
jfd553 (2023-03-25 14:23:37+00:00): Thanks, I'm to get some training ;-)
berndw (2020-09-11 14:18:18+00:00): Hallo MBEC

Willkommen bei OpenstreetMapDa die Bing-Bilder in er Region schlecht positiniert, sie haben teilweise eine Verschiebung von mehreren Metern, bitte ich Dich, Deine Hintergründe auf ESRI umzustellen.

Weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM
Bernd
CRCulver (2020-09-10 10:53:26+00:00): Why have you reverted building=ruins to building=yes for Baltosios Vokės dvaro sodybos rūmai ? A personal survey shows that this building is dilapidated, the windows are covered with boards and parts of the building are left open.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-10 10:55:22+00:00): Structure is there (roof is still there) so it is not in ruins but rather simple abandoned/disused.
CRCulver (2020-09-10 11:03:08+00:00): If you believe the building is "simple abandoned/disused", then why did you revert to building=yes instead of adding the appropriate tags?
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-10 11:09:08+00:00): I've left it to you as you seem to have a lot of spare time :-)
CRCulver (2020-09-10 11:17:50+00:00): "You seem to have a lot of spare time."

This seems like an odd statement from a man who edits OSM all day every single day and who belittles other editors for not showing the same obsessive activity.

The problem with your approach, as I see it, is that you are not leaving any room for visitors to Lithuania making personal surveys, to improve the map. Based purely on your QA tools you are reverting changes for POIs, while not leaving a heads-up on the original changeset so that the mapper knows what is going on. (It was a mere coincidence I looked back at this recent changeset.) Obviously traveler-mappers are not going to monitor changes for every single POI they have mapped across many countries. Surely you are aware of that, and so it would have been helpful for you to add the relevant tags instead of simply reverting. Otherwise, the result is going to be a lot of wasted effort from mappers passing through, and mere stasis for OSM in Lithuania instead of more detailed mapping.
naveenpf (2020-09-15 18:00:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90683120
naveenpf (2020-09-15 17:58:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90683691
eggie (2020-09-10 08:11:43+00:00): Hi kleops.. I merged the info with the present addressnode.
gr eggie
user_5359 (2020-09-10 16:32:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag.
abakus_uploader (2020-09-10 22:30:47+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
naveenpf (2020-09-15 17:57:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90685044
skfd (2020-09-10 10:40:39+00:00): Those rectangles are just floating piers, dont cut them out of the lake please
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90685086
User7 - Lightcyphers (2020-09-10 10:59:08+00:00): OSM task: error for the building in the water. "I rise the building like a bridge but my mistake was that I did not put tag layer 1."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90685086
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:47:46+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2020-09-10 16:31:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
sorcrosc (2020-09-11 21:18:37+00:00): Scusa ma devo chiederti di interrompere questa attività. Osmose serve a segnalare probabili errori ma prima di applicare le soluzioni proposte queste vanno verificate e non mi sembra che tu lo abbia fatto a giudicare dalla mole di modifiche. Leggi bene le istruzioni di Osmose per favore.

Ciao
SimoGine (2020-09-11 21:30:42+00:00): Ciao Sorcrosc. Ho verificato la bontà dei dati sui distributori che conoscevo e altri per strada, i dati risultavano sempre corretti e così essendo dati ufficiale del MISE ho iniziato ad importarli massivamente anche dove non potevo verificare.
I distributori sono molto importanti per la navigazione e pensavo di fare cosa gradita.
DD1GJ (2020-09-10 22:38:42+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Wie ich bereits in einer direkten Mail geschrieben habe, sind massive Löschungen für die Qualitätssicherung recht intransparent und hinterlassen etliche Probleme. Hier waren es z.B. gelöschte Wegstücke außerhalb des NSG oder anschließend verbindungslose Wegstücke im Naturschutzgebiet. Ich habe daher nach einem zeitaufwändigen Korrektur-Fehlversuch wieder den Ursprungszustand  vor der Löschung hergestellt.

Aufgrund massiver Probleme unsachgemäßer Löschungen anderer "amtlicher Stellen" bittet die Community darum, nicht vorhandene oder mittlerweile renaturierte  Wege mittels Zugangsbeschränkungen oder Lebenszyklus zu kennzeichnen. Vorgenommene Änderungen sollten stets der Realität vor Ort entsprechen.

Als Gedächtnisstütze für eine erneute Bearbeitung hier die Übersicht der zurückgesetzten Löschungen
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90686271
multimodaal (2022-01-26 20:03:57+00:00): Hoi, in deze changeset was traffic_sign=G12a toegevoegd aan deze weg: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34015769

Als je langs afrit  6 van de A4 komt, dan is dat inderdaad het laatste bord dat je hebt gezien op het fiets-/bromfietspad, maar dan ben je al wel een aantal kruisingen met andere fietspaden voorbij. En vanaf die andere paden heb je andere borden als laatste gezien: G12 of G13. De bebording is dus niet consistent en of je op die paden met een moped mag rijden hangt of van de rijrichting waar je vandaan komt. Ik heb er na survey het beste van proberen te maken met rijrichting-afhankelijke waarden op basis van de aanwezige borden  en hier de G12a veranderd in unknown.. 
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116636743
Groet!