piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rainero (2022-07-10 21:32:30+00:00): Hello Crick_RN,  
you have removed the MP https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7508790 because it has only one member, the outer. However you should have recognised that there is an inner that should have added instead: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241826119
I am going to revert your edit and correct the MP.  

Best regards,
Rainer

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241826119
Crick_RN (2022-07-12 08:21:39+00:00): Hi Rainero, Thank you for fixing it.
highflyer74 (2022-07-08 09:29:44+00:00): Hello!

In this changeset you added items that are already mapped, thus resulting in double mapping of objects.

Also please let us know what the source of the data you added is. Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-07-08 09:33:44+00:00): CS reverted (reason above).
silversurfer83 (2022-11-16 11:19:18+00:00): Hi highflyer,

kurze mail an die DWG, dann ist Ruhe. Keine Antwort und wiederholte Doppelposts (siehe CS Historie). Block kann aufgehoben werden, sobald eine Antwort vorliegt.

Grüße
silversurfer83
highflyer74 (2022-11-16 15:42:09+00:00): Moin! Hast du das schon gemacht?
highflyer74 (2022-11-18 08:08:58+00:00): @silversurfer83: die Mail ist jetzt raus. Schönen Tag dir!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-18 10:17:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6546

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
silversurfer83 (2022-11-18 16:24:58+00:00): @highflyer Danke. War ziemlich beschäftigt. Sorry.
legofahrrad (2022-07-13 11:47:07+00:00): Moin!
Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich und Fahrradstraße lässt sich nicht kombinieren. Was stimmt hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10049262 ?
Viele Grüße!
GerdP (2022-07-13 12:15:59+00:00): Moin!
Gute Frage, der Weg ist in einer "Radstrassen-Zone, Anlieger Frei". Ich glaube nicht, dass da ein "Zonen-Ende" ausgeschildert war, aber an dem Weg ist ein VZ 325.
Wenn dieses Zeichen die Zone aufhebt, dann ist das bicycle_road=yes falsch.
legofahrrad (2022-07-13 19:27:21+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Antwort!
Das Verkehrszeichen für den verkehrsberuhigten Bereich hebt die Fahrradzone auf. Daher sollte das bicycle_road=yes dort entfernt werden.
Viele Grüße aus Bremen!
GerdP (2022-07-13 20:31:27+00:00): OK, werde ich ändern und mal ein Ticket in JOSM aufmachen, damit da eine Warnung kommt.
Bask (2024-01-23 16:28:45+00:00): Z jakiego powodu połączyłeś wiadukt ze ścieżką? Jeszcze 2 lata temu tam jeszcze nie było fizycznego połączenia z obu stron wiaduktu ze ścieżką. Coś się tam zmieniło?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-12 07:44:45+00:00): Hi Luisespecht,
deine Änderungen an sich sehen auf den ersten Blick korrekt aus, jedoch verteilen sie sich quer über Deutschland. Das macht die Sache sehr unübersichtlich. Daher möchte ich dich bitten in Zunkunft etwas besser darauf zu achten, dass die Änderungen, die du hochlädst auch geografisch enger beieinander liegen :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123343463
NinamitHund (2022-07-12 08:43:08+00:00): Hallo silversurfer, 

es gibt zwei Orte, wo ich mich gut auskenne und oft bin. Das ist Münster in Westfalen (mein voriger Wohnort) und Hüttenheim in Bayern mein jetziger Wohnort.
Daher habe ich dort Korrekturen angegeben.

Das ist ja nicht eigentlich quer durch Deutschland, sondern eben an zwei Orten. 

Ich kann mich gerne erstmal auf meine Wohnort Umgebung konzentrieren.

LG, Nina
silversurfer83 (2022-07-12 08:55:02+00:00): Hallo Nina,
da habe ich mich vielleicht falsch ausgedrückt :)
Es geht nur darum, dass du nicht gleichzeitig in Münster UND in Hüttenheim Dinge änderst. Gerne etwas in Münster ändern, Änderungen speichern / hochladen. Dann wieder in Bayern. Wenn du Dir dein Profil auf osm.org ansiehst, bleiben so die Kästen, die um die Änderungen gezogen werden, wesentlich kleiner.
Grüße
silversurfer83
NinamitHund (2022-07-12 09:24:28+00:00): Ah, ok, das war mir nicht so klar. Verstehe. Danke für den Hinweis.
Es darf also kurz hintereinander sein, aber getrennt hochladen reicht.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-12 09:46:38+00:00): Genau so meine ich das :)
Tob dich gerne aus. Guck dabei ins Wiki und bei Fragen guck in eine der diversen Chatgruppen (discord, telegram, matrix,...) da wird schnell geholfen
silversurfer83 (2022-07-12 09:48:49+00:00): (ups. Sehe grad erst, dass du mit StreetComplete gearbeitet hast. Da halt einfach drauf achten, dass du hochlädst, bevor du den Ort wechsels)
NinamitHund (2022-07-12 14:03:06+00:00): Ja genau, arbeite erstmal mit StreetComplete nachdem ich vor einem Jahr schon mal dran verzweifelt war, Änderungen einzubringen. Bin in der TelegramGruppe und hab den Tipp von dort. Für Anfänger ist das doch erstmal einfacher, als mit dem Original. Wenn ich mehr Erfahrung habe, würde ich aber gerne auch Wege ergänzen, die fehlen. Einige davon sind wunderschön zum Wandern hier. Das mit dem "erst Hochladen" habe ich verstanden. Danke fur die Hilfe.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
GPar (2022-07-08 21:08:23+00:00): you can't edit different airport/places in different continent (also some km may be too far away) because make difficult to see what you are done. 
Please create a changeset for time in the smallest possible area. Thanks
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-07-09 12:23:21+00:00): Apron shape for YUL was aligned with official geodesic data. The correct offset for Bing Maps in the Montreal Area is: 0.6,-1.54

Please revert alignment change.
Benjamin Dupont (2022-07-12 03:19:00+00:00): Sorry for the mistake. I cannot seem to revert my own changes, can someone do it ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Baloo Uriza (2022-07-08 14:26:40+00:00): This one-way probably applies to the entire parking aisle through the Whataburger lot.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123344143
pamprava (2022-07-12 09:17:17+00:00): Hi, 

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. I have added the one-way direction to this road segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076752320) based on the fish-bone parking aisle present. 

If incase the one-way direction has to be added to the entire segment, kindly let me know and I will make the necessary changes from my end. 

Regards,
pamprava
aceman444 (2023-07-11 10:30:56+00:00): Zdravim, a dostane povolenie na tieto cesty kazdy, kto o to poziada (co je sucasny popis hodnoty 'permit')?
Minimalne cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66338849 je len pre vlastnikov pozemkov, cize silne pochybujem ze dostane povolenie kazdy.
aceman444 (2025-02-23 16:44:50+00:00): Hm, bez odpovede. Cize Vy ste chceli dat este prisnejsi zakaz ako je 'private' ale namiesto toho ste dali volnejsi (povolenie dostane lubovolny turista). Nevidim logiku. Okrem toho ak treba povolenie, na dopravnej znacke to nie je uvedene (staci vozidla vlastnikov (asi ste nepochopili, ze tu nie je vlastnikom stat, ale su tam aj sukromne lesy)).
skquinn (2022-12-20 01:35:41+00:00): Are you sure this is the right address (Feagan Street)?
t_ja (2022-07-08 14:34:43+00:00): Dobrý deň,
trochu som opravil zmeny v tejto sade, nakoľko highway=footway je skôr určené na označenie chodníkov so spevneným povrchom (asfalt, zámková dlažba) v rámci zastavaného územia. Použil som https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath , kde je výslovne uvedené, že sa jedná o cestu pre nemotorové vozidlá (+ pohyb pešo, na koni). Doplnil som aj poznámku, že zákaz vyplýva zo skutočnosti, že sa jedná o CHKO (keďže žiadne zákazové značky v teréne asi nie sú). Opravil som tiež posun lesnej cesty, nakoľko podľa Ortofotomozaiky SR bola predtým zakreslená správne.

Ak by sa ale mali všetky lesné cesty v CHKO Kysuce (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6897966 ) označiť ako highway=path, tak potom radšej zvoliť variantu, že síce zostanú označené ako highway=track, ale bude pridaný tag motor_vehicle=no (napr. s dotatočným tagom source:motor_vehicle=CHKO na označenie, že obmedzenie vyplýva z legislatívy). Presné tagovanie by bolo vhodné dohodnúť na osm_sk mailing liste.
aceman444 (2025-02-23 16:58:03+00:00): Suhlasim, toto znacenie v CHKO (a ake su vlastne zakonne pravidla) by sa malo dohodnut na mailing liste, lebo napr. aj tento usek si prekresluje kto chce ako chce a manipujule data aby uspokojil nejaku navigaciu. Uz to zacina byt neunosne.
HellMap (2022-08-17 09:16:35+00:00): Hi! I see you added several fords between tracks/roads and ditches/streams. Are you sure these are actually fords? On aerial, they appear to be culverts.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9873705285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1704977714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9873705303
Toms12345 (2022-08-17 09:47:36+00:00): Oh, my bad. These are culverts. I will be more careful next time.
Toms12345 (2022-08-17 09:49:58+00:00): Fixed.
HellMap (2022-08-17 10:01:54+00:00): Thanks for getting back so quickly! I adjusted the locations a bit further. Waterways and roads should not connect to each other unless they meet on the same level. In this case, the relevant section of the ditch would be a tunnel=culvert with a layer=-1 and the road would simply pass over it without connecting.
Toms12345 (2022-08-17 10:12:57+00:00): Oh, yes. Thank you for explanation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
dcapillae (2022-07-08 07:21:13+00:00): Además de ambos «vasos».
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-07-17 09:49:57+00:00): Hi, all name tag values should be in a local language. You can add a name:de= tag for German. But still, you should avoid translating names, like "Kassioru => Katzental", unless they are actually known by that translation.
(so even a name:de=Katzental should be avoided)
iWowik (2022-07-08 11:54:25+00:00): День добрый!
Обратите пожалуйста на принятый порядо написания слов в названиях улиц
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3#%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B
eggie (2022-11-17 15:53:48+00:00): You are sure?  This is a picknicksite?
eggie (2022-11-17 15:52:15+00:00): Hi Your rest area name 7 juli????  is in the middle of a lake..  removed.
greetz
eggie
somix (2022-07-08 08:04:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. В addr:place "деревня", "село", "город" и т.п. не пишем.
yasslay (2022-07-08 11:08:09+00:00): Hello! I was attempting to add road area to the junction here but I believe I did something wrong and I'm not sure if I didn't make sure it was an area or not. Sorry!
BCNorwich (2022-07-08 14:38:53+00:00): Hi, It flagged up as a edge section of duplicated highway. In that you had inadvertently drawn part of the area on top of the short residential section of Canterbury Road, east end of your area. I've made a minor amendment to correct it.

Regards Bernard.
yasslay (2022-07-08 14:47:19+00:00): Alright, thank you!
Supaplex (2022-07-08 17:37:48+00:00): 我已經加了 Wikidata 連結，有更多資訊都可以加到 OpenStreetMap 或是 Wikidata 上面
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123348861
user_10241830 (2022-07-08 10:30:50+00:00): Hallo,

die B45 ist keine Kraftfahrstraße, das wurde vor vielen Jahren geändert. Die Kraftfahrstraße fängt jetzt erst ab der Kreuzung Fasaneriestraße an.

Allerdings gibt es hier wohl tatsächlich ein ausdrücklich ausgeschildertes Fahrradverbot, das bei uns irgendwie noch fehlt. Das sollte dann tatsächlich nachgetragen werden...
user_10241830 (2022-07-08 10:44:00+00:00): Erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123355677
Ollypsilon (2022-07-08 17:49:08+00:00): Hi! Wie muss ich denn sowas richtig taggen? Bei der B45 Auffahrt weiter südlich bei Nieder-Roden (beim Industriegebiet) funktioniert das Routing und man kann keine Route auf die B45 setzen. Ich möchte ja dazu lernen ;-)
tastrax (2022-07-20 01:21:00+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Msiipola (2022-09-05 08:28:50+00:00): Hej! I det här området har du adderat flera långa service-vägar, som mera ser ut som track, då det slutar i "inget". Är dessa vägar början på en vindkraftspark eller varför är de satta som service?
torger (2022-09-08 08:12:46+00:00): Ja precis, det är en vindkraftspark under uppbyggnad, se ESRI-flygfotona.
torger (2022-09-08 08:15:33+00:00): Den är dock i Härnösands kommun så har inte jobbat igenom hela, vägarna började i Kramfors (som jag jobbar med) så det spall över kommungränsen. NVDB har fortfarande utdaterat data i området, men om nåt år borde det finnas fräscht data
Msiipola (2022-09-08 08:31:07+00:00): Ok! Intressant att LM:s ortofoton inte visar vindsnurrorna, medans ESRI gör det. Det brukar väl oftast vara tvärtom att LM brukar var mer aktuellt.

Men då vet jag att vägarna ska sättas som service och inte track.
torger (2022-09-08 08:59:53+00:00): ESRI är förvånansvärt snabba ibland, LM ortofoto vinner nog oftast, men har flera gånger varit med om att ESRI har nyare foton. Gissar att det händer oftare ute i skogen där jag tror LM inte uppdaterar lika ofta som i tätbebyggt område.
literan (2022-07-10 15:30:49+00:00): не надо, пожалуйста, расставлять эти "зебры" и "пеликаны". Это классификация британских переходов, в России неприменима
user_5359 (2022-07-08 14:33:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Ygramul (2022-07-08 15:15:21+00:00): Oh, you may take that up with the original creator of that node. I simply go through http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm from time to time and correct obvious typos, which in this case was the 'Website' tag. To me it also looked far from typical spam (where the description would include a complete advertisement or similar) and simply unfamiliarity with how things are tagged in OSM. I'd probably have just changed the tags to conform to our typical tags and left a note with the creator here.

Regards,
Johannes

P.S.: Your list of reasons is also overly broad. New objects don't destroy data; yes, standard keys were missing; address data easily be verified from the website. Besides, the creator likely has more on-the-ground knowledge than us, from the looks of it. I'm not sure we should generally discourage shop owners from adding their own shop to OSM.
Harald Hartmann (2023-04-13 10:51:50+00:00): Hallo OMME-OSM, erst einmal vielen Dank für die Überarbeitung des Bereiches rund um die Werraquelle ... aber genau zu diesem Node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/254095307) habe ich eine Frage: ist wirklich "Vordere oder nasse Werraquelle" der Name und "Werraquelle" die Description, oder wäre es nicht umgekehrt (besser)?
PS: ich habe keine Vor-Ort Kenntnis (auch wenn ich schonmal da war), frage rein aus Neugier.
Viele Grüße, Harald
trigpoint (2022-07-08 11:08:24+00:00): Hi, this changeset seems a little odd. Why have you added layer=1 to Tesco, it is very much on the ground.
eggie (2022-07-08 09:08:16+00:00): Dag ZdHV

Goed bedoeld, maar dat gaat niet werken.\ en het is ook niet de bedoeling om het zo te doen.
Je kunt wel de hele  tagging van het zwembad op de adresnode zetten met alle gegevens en dan haal je de tagging van het vlak af of verwijderd het hele vlak (functie zwembad) en vult gewoon de landuse in. 
Dan komt de routering uit bij adresnode 2B 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-08 13:23:51+00:00): De info staat nu alleen nog op de adresnode. Dubbel mappen is niet correct.
Het is of een vlak of een node.
De routering zal vast goed gaan zo. 
MVG
eggie
Carnildo (2022-07-08 21:23:22+00:00): Is there a reason why you disconnected the two parts of Boulder Mountain Spur?  They look connected in the aerial imagery.
Warin61 (2022-07-12 08:30:20+00:00): Hi,

building:levels=elevator is only used around Sydney. What does it mean? 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels?uselang=en for the normal use of the tag building:levels ...
Warin61 (2022-07-12 08:34:31+00:00): Building=roof is usually elevated above 'ground level' by adding the tag layer=1, this keeps it above the platform. .
mapsamillion78 (2022-07-15 07:54:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for seeing this. We will review the tag, as it may be erroneous. I suspect, as per the documentation, [building:levels= number of levels spanned] should be used. We will update the affected polygons if/as required. Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Frans S (2022-07-09 13:28:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
your mappings are somewhat oversized and includes the shadow of that building.
You also shifted the imagery a bit, so buildings do not match with their footprint.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123352054
Supaplex (2022-07-08 18:59:34+00:00): Hi PiegeonMapService:
Could you explain why do you delete the military airport? It seems still exist. If it was converted to new usage, please just change to the new usage by using the correct tags

Dennis Raylin Chen,
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123352227
Supaplex (2022-07-08 19:00:43+00:00): Hi PigeonMapService

你能解释一下为什么要删除军用机场吗？ 它似乎仍然存在。 如果已转换为新用法，请使用正确的标签更改为新用法

Dennis Raylin Chen,
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123352227
geoaria (2022-08-28 14:04:39+00:00): مسیرهای ترسیمی حتما باید به شبکه راهها متصل باشند . از ترسیم مسیر به صورت جزیره خودداری کنید
Frans S (2022-07-09 13:08:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123352378