piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
danbjoseph (2018-10-01 21:00:19+00:00): Hello, in this changeset you moved a hospital.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570532206

Looking at the satellite imagery, the previous location looks like a large complex of buildings that could very well be a health facility. The new location, not so much.

Did you intend to move the hospital location?
danbjoseph (2018-10-01 21:04:58+00:00): I've moved the hospital back since the original mapper notes the following in their profile that they are a local mapper with local knowledge.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yustian

Please be careful in your future edits to not accidentally change existing data to be incorrect.
mueschel (2018-09-29 12:04:52+00:00): Hi,
I saw you added the tag "name:sr-Latin" on 44 ways. The correct spelling would be "name:sr-Latn", without the 'i'. 
Could you have a look and fix these? 
Cheers, Jan
Vinber-Pro (2018-09-29 13:26:59+00:00): Bonjour,
et merci pour vos contributions. Le nom me semble être juste le descriptif, donc pas dans name. Par contre si ce terrain de pétanque a un nom spécifique alors name est le bon endroit pour cela.
Merci
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions si vous voulez, cela sera avec plaisir !
Cyclono (2018-09-28 15:31:01+00:00): ah, alleen het einde van de weg is 1-way?
Jeroen Muris (2018-09-28 15:55:09+00:00): Ja, en niet voor fietsers. Ik heb her wat kleine correcties gedaan, vooral oneway:bicycle=no (en cycleway=opposite; ik weet nooit welke de voorkeur heeft).
Cyclono (2018-09-28 16:43:03+00:00): Ja super goed! De 1-way heb ik ingetekend, ik wist alleen niet zeker tot waar die opliep. Daarom is het belangrijk om meerdere mappers in 1 stad te hebben, die vullen elkaar aan. Top!
frosm (2018-09-29 14:30:32+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
un petit mot à propos des permissions d'accès, celle-ci reflète la présence de panneau.
un chemin piéton qui trop étroit sans panneau qui interdit les véhicules du coup n'a généralement pas besoin d'autre info que "chemin piéton"
bonne continuation
majkaz (2018-10-01 09:03:45+00:00): Hallo,
nichts gegen die meisten Änderungen, aber bitte die Addresspunkte von den Eisenbahnstationen sind in Tschechien nicht zu löschen!
Sandmann4u (2018-10-01 15:43:20+00:00): Hallo,
bitte sage mir doch um welchen Bahnhof es sich handelt. Damit ich dein Problem nachvollziehen kann und dir eine Antwort geben kann.
majkaz (2018-10-01 15:49:32+00:00): Es handelt sich zum Beispiel um Chotycany 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/668721479/history
Sandmann4u (2018-10-01 17:04:33+00:00): OK, ich habe gefunden, was du meinst, aber um das im Detail nachvollziehen zu können, worum es geht, da fehlen mir die Kenntnisse, wie ich das Changelog einsehen kann.
majkaz (2018-10-01 17:36:45+00:00): Es geht darum, dass Du da etwas gelöscht hast, wo Du anscheinend nicht verstanden hast, was es ist. Um zu verstehen, was dabei falsch ist, fehlen Dir anscheinend die Kenntnisse der tschechischen Gewöhnlichkeiten beim Mappen. Leider sind diese nur auf Tschechisch dokumentiert.
Ganz genau geht es darum, dass in Tschechien die Adressen (Hausnummern) nicht auf einen Polygon (auf das Gebäude selbst) sondern an einem extra Punkt innerhalb dessen gehören. Du hast diese gelöscht, und somit auch die Adresse aus der Karte genommen. 

Ganz einfach: Wenn Du was änderst, dann bitte nur das, wo Du ganz sicher weist, was es für die Karte bedeutet.

Ich habe jetzt auch genauer woanders nachgeschaut: Bitte auch keine Gebäude verschieben. Ich habe keine Ahnung, woher Du die Gebäuden in Rozmital pod Tremsinem genommen hast - aber die sind schlichtweg falsch positioniert, vorher war es richtig, soweit ich es sehe. So hat es sowie nach der Katasterkarte, als auch nach dem Register der Gebäuden gestimmt. Bitte keineswegs nicht nach Bing ohne weiteres abzuzeichnen, wenn schon, ist der Bild nach der Katasterkarte zu orientieren.
Vinber-Pro (2018-09-29 13:23:02+00:00): Bonjour,
sur ces modifications, votre commentaire n'est pas vraiment explicite. Vous semblez avoir changé le nom de l'école élémentaire en école primaire. hors j'ai l'impression que c'est bien l'élémentaire ici (cp-CM2) et la maternelle (3-6 ans) est sans doute un peu au nord ouest à en croire la photo aérienne. La primaire étant maternelle plus élémentaire (https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/N54)
SK53 (2018-09-28 16:17:02+00:00): Please dont do this it is completely unnecessary. OSM stores geographical information: it is trivially easy to calculate the area. Furthermore as OSM gets improved incrementally areas may change, so if you used OSM to calculate the area the value you added might be wrong in the future. If you used some other source such as Wikipedia then you may also be wrong (what is the area of the Aral Sea), but in that case you may be violating the Ts&Cs which you agreed to when signing up.

Lastly fixed sizes for large sea areas are not useful because there will be multiple likely definitions (this is one reason why many of these are mapped as nodes not areas).

Areas should be avaialble on Wikidata. That is a suitable platform for this type of information.
aharvey (2018-09-29 10:09:21+00:00): I agree with SK53, this should be reverted for those reasons.
xoryo (2018-10-03 08:21:11+00:00): If we remove this, shouldn't we then also remove the other areas from the sea nodes? There are still a few, that is why I also added some sea areas in the past.
A bird (2018-10-04 11:42:55+00:00): How do you calculate the area when they are mapped as nodes and not areas?
SK53 (2018-10-04 12:22:25+00:00): The whole point is that these are mapped as points because there is no clear consensus about their boundaries. Any area will be approximate and not guaranteed to be one that others will arrive at. Such subjective information just doesn't belong in OSM. Just because it is possible to add information to OSM does not imply that it *should* be added.

As I said in my original post, wikipedia or wikidata are potential places to store such values (where they will usually be backed by some reference source).
Myazyk (2018-09-28 18:14:39+00:00): Та шо ти зі всіх ґруньтовок робив residential. Ну нема між Пластунів і Вільде вулиці
Myazyk (2018-09-28 18:15:59+00:00): Та шо ти зі всіх ґрунтовок робиш residential.
Ну нема між Пластунів і Вільде вулиці
olehz (2018-09-28 19:48:41+00:00): все я правильно роблю. track - то для лісовозів і тракторів. Вікі про це чітко пише. ті дороги доступні лише для пішого чи велорутингу. автомобілі міські там не проїдуть, або їздять дуже дуже рідко. і ті дороги як правило ведуть в нікуди. або на вирубку в лісі або в поле. ця ж дорога проїзна, в місті і там їздять. нічим не гірша за сусідні вуличні дороги. а для покриття є окремі теги. track-ом можна позначити наприклад, шматок дороги від нових будинків на Міських Загородах до гаражів на Бориславську. Там колись була нормальна проїзна дорога. Але тепер поставили блок і воно все заросло. Там тепер хіба на тракторі.
Myazyk (2018-09-29 08:24:37+00:00): Тобто у полі в кінці вулиці Коновальця треба всі польові дороги позначити як residential, бо по них можуть проїхати не лише лісовози, а й фіри та легкові автомобівлі?
Myazyk (2018-09-29 08:25:20+00:00): А ше ти зовсім не думаєш про естетичний вигляд карти
olehz (2018-09-29 09:08:39+00:00): На Коновальця не треба. Ті дороги не використовуються в автомобільному трафіку. Там нема будинків чи іінших промобєктів. Мова не про можуть-не можуть. Мова про фактичне використання дороги. Якщо у лісі стоїть промисловий обєкт і туди йде грунтовка, ми не позначаємо її як track, а як unclassified. Ну почитай Вікі - естетика тут ні до чого
mtmail (2018-09-28 15:38:03+00:00): Postleitzahl anhand deren Webseite korrigiert
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 18:00:53+00:00): maliciously deleted landuse restored. 

DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Cyclono (2018-09-28 16:45:01+00:00): Groot onderhoud aan de Maastunnel, ook op OSM ;)
aceman444 (2021-04-26 01:10:37+00:00): Hi, you can't use any other maps to input data into OSM. So this changeset is invalid and must be reverted.

Also, please don't do changes in such a large area (multiple countries) in one changeset.

Don't add fictional name:de tags where you just made a translation for the object.

Also where did you get the address of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59534262 from?
frosm (2018-09-29 14:31:51+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
pourriez-vous positionner le vétérinaire au bon endroit ? j'espère que son bureau n'est pas dans la rue mais dans un des batiments proche :)
Myazyk (2018-09-28 18:50:13+00:00): Шось ти з нумерацією на Пластунів намутив (чи ти недоробив просто) - замість №40 має бути 44-46, замість №42 - 48-50
Mloni (2018-10-03 14:36:26+00:00): Hallo, das korrekte Schema für Fahrradstraßen ist hier beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road
kapazao (2018-09-28 16:50:01+00:00): Hola, trata de utilizar buenos comentarios para los cambios que hagas y no uses siempre al mismo, así nos ayudamos todos. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63014075
Владимир К (2018-12-08 12:14:53+00:00): добрый день. вы делаете переходы неверно. в моем профиле вы найдете полезные ссылки, где сможете найти нужную информацию или обратитесь ко мне.
pio2_122 (2018-09-28 17:02:31+00:00): "Pierwsze 15 miesięcy realizacji kontraktu to prace projektowe i uzyskiwanie decyzji ZRID, po jej wydaniu ruszą roboty budowlane – mówi Łukasz Lendner Dyrektor GDDKiA O/Szczecin." Z tagiem construction musisz jeszcze trochę poczekać
maciek-szn (2018-09-30 11:18:33+00:00): Niektórzy są tak niecierpliwi, że już kilka razy musiałem "zamykać" węzeł Kijewo po rzekomo zakończonej przebudowie ;-)
viloan (2018-09-28 17:01:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pio2_122 (2018-09-28 17:23:16+00:00): Dróg nieoznakowanych numerami w terenie nie oznaczamy tagiem ref.
Tutaj kilka reguł:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_practice#Nie_mapuj_lokalnego_prawa.2C_je.C5.9Bli_nie_wi.C4.85.C5.BCe_si.C4.99_ono_z_obiektami_w_rzeczywisto.C5.9Bci

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_practice#Nie_mapuj_pod_renderowanie
mueschel (2018-10-04 11:00:02+00:00): Hi,
I wouldn't invent a new tag here - you can use the established :conditonal syntax. Like:
lit:conditional = yes; no @ Mo-Su 00:00-05:00
Jan
iandees (2018-09-28 17:37:39+00:00): Hi! Please be careful about switching "place" tags. For example, Mankato probably should remain a town, not a city.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63015927
murve33 (2018-09-28 18:06:47+00:00): Mankato is a complicated issue due to it bordering the towns of North Mankato and Skyline, and 2 or 3 villages. The combined popupation is about 55,000, has 4 colleges, and is the regional hub for at least a 6 county area.
The populations listed for the villages I changed to hamlets is incorrect. The hamlets each have a population of about 10.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63015927
alod (2018-12-27 19:41:55+00:00): Отмеченных узкоколеек давно нет, а действующие грунтовки  этой правкой испорчены. Аккуратнее надо быть!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63015994
PT-53 (2022-03-08 07:11:17+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
keep right zeigt hier
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5937299423#map=19/48.37748/9.64173
mehrere Hinweise "fehlende Tags, " an:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.37761&lon=9.64152&zoom=18&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C70

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
Peter
OF-1 (2022-03-08 11:25:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Punkte wurden entfernt.
Grüße
Ottmar
eggie (2018-09-28 21:42:42+00:00): Hier heb ik de pitch even in een mp gezet anders zie je er niets van op afgeleide kaarten. De speeltuin heb ik losgekoppeld van het gras. Beter geen vlakken op vlakken tekenen... of scheiden ..of in een mp-relatie met inner en outer.
segubi (2021-06-02 16:46:41+00:00): Hallo, 
ich bin gerade über die Relation 405200 gestolpert, die Du anscheinend vor 3 Jahren mit diesem Changeset zur Fahrradroute gemacht hast. Die Relation besteht schon seit 2010, sieht nach einer halbherzig begonnenen Fahrradroute aus. Ist sie löschbar? Oder sind einfach die Tags falsch?
Eventuell ist nur das Tag public_transport:version=2 versehentlich in eine Fahrradroute geraten. Dann wäre sie allerdings wohl auch löschbar, da sie weitgehend ein Teilstück der  BahnRadRoute Teuto-Senne übereinstimmt (Relation 12629220).
Grüße, Sebastian
hybridOL (2021-06-02 19:39:49+00:00): Ich hatte damals nur geprüft, ob es eine Busroute ist, die so zumindest nicht existiert. Da einige Radwege enthalten sind, habe ich das auf Radroute geändert. Das PTv2 ist wohl nur zwischendurch von JOSM ergänzt worden. Aber weiter hänge ich nicht an der Route, kann also auch weg.
Gruß, Christian
segubi (2021-06-02 19:54:09+00:00): OK, ich mach das nachher mal... ich glaube kaum, dass sie jemand vermißt, geschweige denn, dass es jemandem auffällt...
Grüße, Sebastian
eggie (2018-09-28 21:04:58+00:00): Het voetpad bij de Ambachtslaan zit nog vastgeplakt aan de landuse met een node. Maak je het zelf los? Je kunt de node gewoon verwijderen. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63016262
viloan (2018-09-28 17:40:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Leo Slager (2018-09-28 20:58:15+00:00): Je kunt de Van der Hoopstraat eerst losmaken van de rotonde en daarna verschuiven en weer vastmaken op de juiste plaats.
Ik zal het even voor je aanpassen.
Leo Slager (2018-09-28 21:04:57+00:00): Het nieuwe voetpad wat je had getekend  was niet vastgemaakt aan de Waszinkstraat en eindigde dus in het luchtledige. Dan kan er dus ook geen route over het voetpad worden gevonden: het routeert niet.
JohnHln (2018-09-29 08:17:06+00:00): Bedankt Leo Slager. Ik ben (nog) niet (zo) thuis in het werken met OSM. Zoals jij het hebt aangepast (6747854, v10) is zoals ik het bedoeld had en zoals het hoort.
ForstEK (2018-09-28 17:58:09+00:00): source: http://amurohota.ru/attachments/article/816/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%20%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%90%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D1%82%201%20%D0%B8%D1%8E%D0%BB%D1%8F%202016%20%E2%84%96291.doc
stevea (2018-09-29 20:44:19+00:00): Gleb, I'm disappointed that after all of our good communication you continue to characterize the three versions of imported SCCGIS data which were carefully-curated over several years  as "exported polygon mess."

We agree they are not "perfect," as very few things in OSM are.  We agree they are (maybe about 98% or 99%) correct, as polygons and multipolygons are perfectly valid OSM data structures, and the data provided by the County are/were perfectly valid based on cadestral/parcel data.  We agree that you "prefer" to use your JOSM tool reltoolbox to assist you in conflating edges, and Frederik Ramm, mailing lists and I agree that "to take perfectly valid data and convert it to another format as this tool does" is essentially a senseless waste of time.

I understand that "you live here" (and for many decades, I have lived here, too) and want to see data improve in our County.  However, it remains true that there ARE existing data surrounding us in OSM.  If/as/when data are "just plain wrong," of course, I encourage you to correct them.  But to disparage the existing, correct data with mean comments like "mess"  is not in the spirit of OSM.

Thank you for your improvements.
glebius (2018-09-30 17:19:04+00:00): The exported data is of very bad quality. I would dare
to say of extremely bad quality, since even roads
sometimes do not reflect reality.

In this particular area curve of Comstock Mill Rd
didn't follow real road. Robinridge Lane didn't even
had a single point matching reality, it was going
to the north-east of Comstock, crossing several
private lots, while in reality it goes south of Comstock.
I fixed that 6 months ago.

The polygon data is also shit. The county data (at
least the data they give to you) do not reflect reality.
A wood where in reality there is a meadow - multiple
examples. Vice versa - multiple examples. Soquel
Demo Forest going over private property. I know it
is incorrect, I can give you names of people whose
land was mapped as SDF.

Finally, even most official not outdated cadestral/parcel
data is incorrect. Let me explain why. It is data of the
last land survey that was converted to Lon/Lat in a
very rough manner. The actual borders of lots
are defined not by lat/lon but in a text manner, e.g.
"600 feet from junction", "300 feet along canyon".
When county does surveys they encounter lots of
problems - streams changed their curve, a road has
moved due to mudslide, etc.
After survey is done, new data enters the database.
I believe for surveys made in last 10 years it has a very
good precision. But for some lots last survey was
performed in 19th century! Until survey is done, the
actual border is where neighbors agree it to be.
Where a fence is, or where a road or stream is now.
Which means TRUTH ON THE GROUND. Not in the
county database, sorry.

We already discussed quality of data at database
level: adjacent polygons overlap, are not connected
to each other. An attempt to improve forest borderline
pulls a ton of problems. This all just blocks editing of
data by inexperienced mappers.

So what is our goal: to fill the map with something
so that map looks nice when zoomed out? Or may be
to maintain a copy of county cadestral/parcel db? I believe
our goal is to have the best damn map in the world,
which is true and precise at any zoom level! In some
regions of the world OSM is already damn best. In the
SC county we are like stuck in a clinch, we are in a limbo.
New mappers open data in JOSM, see the mess and run
away. Those who are willing to resolve the mess are being
asked to stay away. But still edits are coming in, so your
endeavors to do continuous exports become more and more
difficult. May be it is time to stop exporting? Exporting
was a good thing 10 years ago, when OSM was all virgin
and white. Now it does more evil than good.

I really wish we escalate this disagreement to a larger level,
so that more people can participate.
stevea (2018-10-02 17:57:29+00:00): As suggested, this discussion is "moved" to https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Santa_Cruz_County,_California so that we may better engage a wider OSM community.
glebius (2018-10-02 18:07:55+00:00): Sorry for not replying. I will reply by email today.
stevea (2018-10-02 18:12:59+00:00): No problem; take your time, and let's take it to the Talk page rather than here, as it is the "more public/wider community" forum that encourages more people to see the discussion and participate if they want to do so.
sergeybe (2018-12-14 14:30:12+00:00): Здравствуйте! А можно узнать откуда название "Гора ласточек"? Нет ни одного источника подтверждающего это название.
sergeybe (2019-03-03 07:40:56+00:00): Убираю самовыдуманное название.
elektronisk (2018-09-28 20:16:41+00:00): Hei! Fint hvis du kan skrive mer detaljert kommentar på endringene dine. :)
kapazao (2018-09-29 10:33:25+00:00): Good morning, I have seen your changes on bus stops. Please, don't use bus numbers or references on names. Regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63017454
opendcc (2018-09-29 04:38:18+00:00): Hallo,

'Wo bleibt das Laub' - was ist das für eine Touristenattraktion genau?
viloan (2018-09-28 18:23:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
joost schouppe (2018-11-17 13:32:46+00:00): J'ai combiné le POI et le polygone du chateau. Pour les eaux, j'ai fait un multipolygone, comme ca le chateau est "un ile"
Peter Bremer (2020-01-29 20:49:39+00:00): Dat is een typisch voorbeeld van "Tagging for the renderer" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer