piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evgenykatyshev (2022-08-31 05:34:54+00:00): The Greak Theathre and Panionium are two different archaeological sites? Or the first one is part of the second? Maybe we need to delete archaeological_site tag from the theatre?
mappinglander (2022-09-01 12:41:48+00:00): I think the same. The theatre is already excavated, and the whole site seems to be referred as Panionium (including at road signs)
trial (2022-08-28 20:29:26+00:00): Bonjour, j’allais vous/te faire la remarque que classer aussi important cette route que la D 170 à côté ne me semblait pas pertinent. Si les corrections sont faites avant ! ^^.
Bienvenu·e dans OpenStreetMap.
ElliottPlack (2022-08-28 01:50:26+00:00): Something seems amiss with this edit. mostly that it crosses the earth. The motorcycle parkings look more like woods. Was that intentional?
mcliquid (2022-09-01 04:54:54+00:00): Hi and also a warm welcome to OSM!

Please, next time, save such edits separately. All other Mappers will thank you as then it wont cause history view glut anywhere else in between.

For your reading pleasure: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
jxpsert (2023-05-26 07:00:51+00:00): Hi there Britzz,
"indoor=wall" is a tag for indoor mapping of walls. If an AED is inside, "indoor=yes" should be used.
jxpsert (2023-05-26 07:01:17+00:00): My bad for the wrong name, I'm copying my comment to multiple wrong changesets.
fgouget (2023-05-26 23:13:25+00:00): Thanks for the notification.
I changed indoor to yes.
archie (2022-08-27 20:53:27+00:00): Hej,
du har flyttat hela den här vägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229930345) till fel position. Du har använt Bing som bakgrundsbild. Bakgrundsbilden måste först justeras. Den är inte rätt positionerad och har en s k imagery offset. Hur du gör en justering INAN du ritar eller ändrar något kan du läsa här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery. För att få rätsida på dina editeringar måste du nu först justera bakgrundsbilden och sedan rätta vägsträckningen.
Joel Oredsson (2022-08-27 21:18:41+00:00): Ah okay, det förklarar en del. Då ska jag se om jag kan ta bort den här ändringen. Nog lättare att börja om...
Joel Oredsson (2022-08-29 14:09:17+00:00): Det verkar inte finnas ett sätt att lätt bara ta bort denna changeset... eller jag hittar inget iaf.
archie (2022-08-29 14:33:15+00:00): Nu har jag reverterat (återtagit) changeset.
connochaetes (2022-08-27 20:55:38+00:00): Falscher Titel - Korrektur: Georgsmarienhütte - Stadtteil Alt-Georgsmarienhütte - Wohngegend Malbergen
skquinn (2022-08-27 20:38:46+00:00): Bing should be in sources here
skquinn (2022-08-27 20:38:33+00:00): Bing should be in sources here
skquinn (2022-08-27 20:38:21+00:00): Bing should be in sources here
user_2066394 (2022-09-07 22:50:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706057831
LAn der Stelle verläuft der Bach eigentlich in tunnel=culvert
user_2066394 (2022-09-07 22:52:03+00:00): Laut aktuellem Mapping verläuft der Bach an der Stelle in tunnel=culvert , dürfte also gar nicht sichtbar sein?
user_2066394 (2022-09-09 18:39:57+00:00): bereinigt
eggie (2022-08-28 06:21:32+00:00): Dag Niek  
"Changed Holleweg from "assumed not-one way" to "one way"   "
Je bedoelt waarschijnlijk oneway=no?

MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2022-08-30 07:27:20+00:00): operator:type=private
To nie jest przedszkole miejskie.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2022-08-31 19:43:41+00:00): http://przedszkolelipi.pl/statut/
maraf24 (2022-09-01 13:05:01+00:00): A czytałeś?
Paragraf 1 punkt 4.
tastrax (2022-12-09 11:45:24+00:00): I have just corrected many of these features that were 'named' incorrectly. Check out the wiki for golf courses and you will save yourself heaps of time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Cheers
lefuturiste (2022-08-27 21:14:02+00:00): used imagery: BD Ortho
Irma IRM-ED (2023-01-11 04:40:26+00:00): Hi  lorenzo23622
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I came across this area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/689585110 I found an issue with the layer tag. After that, I checked various satellite imagery. I couldn’t find any bridge or layer tag to support it. So i think you added a tag layer accidentally, or any suggestion? Would you mind coming and rechecking this issue? I am not sure how to fix this as an armchair mapper.

cheers
kepivar (2022-08-27 21:42:08+00:00): Hi Mauls,

giving generic changeset is not a friendly turn to the other mappers.
SHARCRASH (2022-08-28 20:31:59+00:00): @kepivar you neither are having a friendly attitude to mappers and even quite suspicious : 
- you don't seem cooperative since you didn't answer yet my questions but you've have been questioning others in the mean time.
- you've been contacting other contributors on their changesets randomly worldwide. Well it's nice to point what is wrong but... 
- using a recent account with ZERO contributions, but you seem knowing some things about OSM, so possibly not your first sockpuppet account and hiding yourself from something 
- clearly it gives you some sort of advantage, if you enter in conflict regarding preferences in tags with someone, it is quite twisted.
puma515 (2022-08-28 09:15:47+00:00): Moin,
Warscheinlich nicht bekannt aber 
Biogasanlagen werden mit building=digester erstellt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=digester?uselang=de

habe die 3 Fermenter dem entsprechend angepasst.
hendrik-17 (2022-08-28 11:12:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die Anpassung!
eggie (2022-08-28 04:58:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_15552334 (2022-08-27 23:17:59+00:00): Keep changeset at sizeable area
tastrax (2022-12-09 11:46:49+00:00): I have just corrected many of these features that were 'named' incorrectly. Check out the wiki for golf courses and you will save yourself heaps of time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Cheers
evod (2022-09-06 04:50:58+00:00): hey, darf ich fragen warum du die goldschlagstraße beim reindlpark wieder zu einer "normalen" straße umgetaggt hast?
Luzandro (2022-09-08 04:24:59+00:00): ist allerdings auch kein Radweg, sondern Fußgängerzone mit Radfahrerlaubnis - habe es entspr. geändert
evod (2022-09-08 04:57:55+00:00): Aja, ich hab nur geraten weil noch keine Schilder standen. Danke!
starfury7 (2022-09-08 12:28:18+00:00): Hi @evod, Sorry für die späte Antwort.
Ich bin da an dem Tag durchgefahren, und da war noch nicht absehbar was daraus wird, wegen der fehlenden Schilder, aber nach einem Radweg hat es - wegen der Pflasterung - nicht ausgeschaut, daher dachte ich, es ist besser den vorigen Zustand zu belassen, bis klar ist was es wirklich wird. 
Der Wiener Stadtplan war/ist auch keine Hilfe, weil noch nicht aktualisiert.
evod (2022-09-12 09:22:03+00:00): Ich dachte mir ich mapp es mal als Radweg weil klar war, dass Kfz nicht mehr fahren dürfen, aber es zu belassen ist natürlich auch valide.. aber jetzt hat das raten eh ein Ende gefunen dank Luzandro :)
i2004 (2022-08-27 22:21:23+00:00): estan en obra
i2004 (2022-08-27 22:21:51+00:00): lo vas a ver en esta web https://www.quepasaweb.com.ar/centro-comercial-de-munro-colocan-bicicleteros-hacen-nuevas-veredas-y-amplian-el-boulevard-en-mitre/
AgusQui (2022-08-29 14:49:27+00:00): Ok
Frans S (2022-08-28 09:46:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125458933
Frans S (2022-08-28 10:20:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125458950
Frans S (2022-09-28 12:23:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but the tagging of highways is not correct.

Please read this wiki about tagging highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125459035
i2004 (2022-08-27 22:40:06+00:00): te vuelvo a decir que si están haciendo obras
Allison P (2022-08-27 23:28:03+00:00): After marking all detached houses as such, I downloaded only those that didn't have an address node inside them (which can be conflated automatically), then for each combination of predirectional and address parity, I moved them in bulk in the direction of the houses, hopefully enough for them to fall within the outline. About half of these were able to be conflated after a single move. I then looked at what was remaining, and again moved them towards their respective buildings. Any that I was unable to conflate by this method, I purged to ensure they would not be moved in the dataset.

Unfortunately, four errors were introduced here. However, these can easily be spotted, as there will seem to be both an extra address node and a house with no address. I corrected them and conflated what even this method missed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125459918.

This method is more effective than conflating by hand. Though it is not massively faster than conflating one-by-one (no more than twice as fast), this method also results in buildings being tagged in more detail. Additionally, the work is far less menial, because many buildings can be selected with a single drag and they can all be marked as detached, and dozens or more buildings can be conflated with a few clicks.

This method only really works in areas with low setbacks; in Eagle, many nodes could not be moved far enough to be conflated without also moving nodes over a far enough distance to be conflated with the wrong house. It is essentially useless in low-density areas where nodes are often placed on the center of properties, particularly farms. It will almost always be necessary to conflate these manually. Fortunately, these represent a small fraction of the homes in Ada County, and I have already done many, if not most of them.
Allison P (2022-08-27 23:52:26+00:00): I uncovered two more errors from a thorough check. One of them was a manual mistake, so I would conclude that in these mixed areas that represent much of the remaining conflation the error rate is 0.5% and easily fixable. All things considered, I was able to conflate about 1,500 buildings in an hour and a half. I imagine that with the experience gained I will be much quicker in my next attempt.
Leo Slager (2022-08-28 23:18:05+00:00): Dag Teek,
Op de begraafplaats in Den Burg heb je weer een wirwar van door elkar lopende ways achtergelaten.
Ik heb het gebouw hersteld in de oorspronkelijke vorm.
De landuse is echter een chaos.
Wil daar nog even naar kijken en repareren. 
TIP1: Misschien beter om lijnen die op elkaar liggen eerst van elkaar los te maken voor je begint met nodes te verslepen.
TIP2: Als je zulke grote oppervlakten wilt bewerken, verdeel dat dan in kleinere stukken. Dat maakt fouten herstellen veel makkelijker te doen.
Leo Slager (2022-08-28 23:18:36+00:00): Kijk hier nog even wat de schade is:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125459586
Leo Slager (2022-08-29 21:55:00+00:00): geen reactie ontvangen.
partly reverted.
Allison P (2022-08-28 14:20:28+00:00): Thank you for the addition, but again, please use better changeset comments. They don't need to be complicated; "added driveway" works fine here.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-11 10:41:56+00:00): Please don't overcomplicate multipolygons.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125460339
Mashin (2022-08-28 08:20:36+00:00): Hi, you double tagged golf=fairway features. They already exist as multipolygons e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12772930

Please don't change data just to fit your particular use case.
Tetryk (2022-08-29 19:44:41+00:00): Oznaczałem te przystanki wg schematu https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kubahahaha/diary/398500
Po Twojej zmianie osmose oznacza brak tagu, który usunąłeś.
Rogoyski (2022-08-29 20:41:15+00:00): Usunąłem highway_bus_stop z węzła na drodze (i ustawiłem w miejscu oczekiwania). O tym właśnie mówi twój link.

Teraz Osmose chciałby jeszcze public_transport=platform na tymże nowym węźle w obrębie chodnika. To można zrobić, ale wtedy trzeba usunąć ten tag z obiektu liniowego, gdzie jest highway=platform. Sam bym może i tak zrobił (highway=platform nie używałbym wcale), ale tu się wahałem i ostatecznie ograniczyłem zakres swoich zmian. Nie widzę nawet w Warszawie jakiegoś konsekwentnego schematu, na który mógłbym się powołać.
Tetryk (2022-08-30 07:57:45+00:00): Ok. Miałem na myśli ten drugi przystanek JP II 02. Widać jednak, że tych przystanków jeszcze ostatecznie nie korygowałem.
Po wielu próbach doszedłem do wniosku, że schemat kubahahaha jest optymalny, a więc:
1 public_transport=stop_position - tu nie ma wątpliwości
2 highway=platform - jako obiekt chodnikowy (way lub area) niezwiązany relacją z trasą komunikacji
3 highway=bus_stop(tram) razem z public_transport=platform - jako węzeł, który ja kojarzę ze słupkiem (znakiem) przystankowym, w relacji z trasą, z wszelkimi informacjami i udogodnieniam dla tego przystanku oraz dobrze renderujący się na mapie.
Rogoyski (2022-08-30 17:46:38+00:00): Doczytałem teraz Kubę. Rzeczywiście, to, co napisałem, że można zrobić, żeby zadowolić Osmose, czyli przenieść p_t=platform na węzeł h=bus_stop, jest przez niego przewidziane. Ten schemat i walidacja Osmose jest więc spójna.

Na przystanku Jana Pawła II 02 zdeduplikowałem p_t=platform, tyle że w drugą stronę niż by wynikało z tego schematu. Od teraz postaram się jednak do niego stosować.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-01-17 05:51:33+00:00): Hi Warin,

I'm trying to find more information about Shakeys Forest which appears on the DCS map (you also added it in this changeset)

You wouldn't happen to know what org is responsible for it, or what it's purpose is, would you?

If not, I'll add it to the list for a drive out to.
Warin61 (2023-01-17 11:22:31+00:00): I got it off the Base Map. A google got some hits ... 
https://oa.anu.edu.au/obituary/craft-joseph-25558
But no real information as to who runs it. Possibly the local council. But no luck with a search on Central Coast Council. It is a nice part of the world.
Adamant1 (2022-09-19 11:24:42+00:00): No insult, but it would have been better not to map this as one giant multipolygon with a bunch of members. That's not really what they are for and it makes any of editing to the area after the fact either impossible or extremely hard.  Not to mention they are separate orchards and there's the whole "one object, one OSM rule." What I would have if it were me was map 
the orchards as separate areas and end them at the main roads like I've done in a lot of places north of here. Don't surprised if I delete it at some point. I'm starting to get down to that area with the work I'm doing anyway. 

Try to be more careful about it next time and consult other mappers in the area before you make large changes. There's a reason things are mapped here how they are mapped. If giant multiplepolygons where the best way to map things in the area it would have already been mapped that way a long time ago. There are good reason's it isn't that I don't really feel the need to go into. 

Thanks, I appreciate the mapping otherwise. It's always nice when new mappers edit in the area. 

Adamant1
Warin61 (2022-08-28 03:04:13+00:00): Opps,
Changeset comment should be prefixed with "Australia, SA, "
FJili (2022-08-28 16:13:35+00:00): Hi, I notice that you comment changeset in English. I suppose that you are willing to discuss in English.
The Bing maps aerial might be inaccurate and out of date in China. So local editor usual use Esri World Imagery to edit.
archpdx (2022-08-28 22:44:08+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125461976
archpdx (2022-08-28 22:44:10+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125461976
archpdx (2022-08-28 22:44:12+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125461976
archpdx (2022-08-28 22:38:18+00:00): Hi,

It appears that this is an import of building footprints. Please note that imports must be discussed and documented prior to uploading, see https://wiki.osm.org/Import/Guidelines

Although the quality of these footprints are fine, this changeset adds tags to these buildings that aren't useful for OpenStreetMap. For example: 'FID', 'capture_da', and 'release' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089782309

It also looks like each node part of the building ways are also tagged with 'building=yes'. These nodes shouldn't have any tags to comply with https://wiki.osm.org/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I ask that you revert this changeset and follow the import guidelines/fix errors I pointed out before reimporting. If you're not sure how to revert changes, read https://wiki.osm.org/Change_rollback
Allison P (2022-08-28 23:09:38+00:00): These appear to be Bing footprints. Consider using the MapWithAI plugin (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/MapWithAI) instead. And as archpdx said, unless you are manually reviewing every single building, you need to go through the import approval process first. You can't rely on other mappers to "fix if there is a problem"; there shouldn't be one in the first place.
HelloItsKaz (2022-09-04 23:16:41+00:00): Hi thank you. I will do what I can thanks.
user_5359 (2022-09-27 08:57:37+00:00): Hello! Could we help? What is the meaning of the tags
FID = 1600
capture_da = 10/10/2019-10/28/2019
release = 2
Did you need this foreign tags?
❤️‍🔥 (2022-08-28 03:40:04+00:00): Hi, please see comments on https://osm.org/changeset/125462175
ricardbr (2022-08-28 03:03:02+00:00): You cannot enter this gate
ricardbr (2022-08-28 03:03:40+00:00): You cannot enter this gate from Aurelia it is one way out exit and fire
❤️‍🔥 (2022-08-28 03:38:52+00:00): Hi, these are not tertiary roads. Please see https://wiki.osm.org/Key:highway#Highway for information about the different types of roads in OSM
jeslop (2022-08-28 11:51:35+00:00): Location Capture By ATXLDN don't change road classification with your own assumptions, read the wiki entry suggested by kylenz.

In addition to this, remember to make good changesets comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:26:53+00:00): Captura de ubicación Por ATXLDN la clasificación de carreteras no se aplica en suposiciones, y se proporciona con datos del mundo real Saludos, ATXLDN
jeslop (2022-08-28 18:42:41+00:00): From wiki: highway = tertiary "The next most important roads in a country's system. (Often link smaller towns and villages)". Roads in Balmoral Forest don't link anything, only internal roads.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 23:35:54+00:00): Hemos añadido carreteras que originalmente no existían en OSM
literan (2022-08-28 20:30:07+00:00): от балды на меняли статусы дорог, плюс нарисовали фейковые парки. Так дело не пойдет, откат
impiaaa (2022-08-30 01:46:22+00:00): Please make sure to save your changes in one area before moving on to another, so that the bounding box doesn't cover irrelevant areas. Also, try to use a changeset comment that describes what you changed, not just where you got the data.
Glassman (2022-08-28 16:21:06+00:00): #TIP: To preserve the history of objects instead of deleting the whole building and business, just remove the business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125462371
jnighan (2023-09-28 18:43:00+00:00): Goshen East Street should be highway=tertiary and not highway=secondary under the Connecticut/Highway Classification scheme because it has ConnDOT functional classification major collector. I have changed it back to highway=secondary
jnighan (2023-09-28 18:43:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
user_5359 (2022-08-29 19:07:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1089786094. What is the meaning of the tag Buildings=yes on an area with landuse=forest. Please paint the building inside of the landuse and add the key building (lower case and without a plural s).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
nevw (2022-08-28 05:16:07+00:00): What have you mapped here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9982766320
ro83rt (2022-08-28 08:49:51+00:00): It’s a trail diversion. The main trail was blocked and you have to detour. What I named the spot is the detours name.
ro83rt (2022-08-28 08:57:11+00:00): FYI I recorded the track as well, but can’t seem to work out how to upload the data
nevw (2022-08-28 09:21:57+00:00): “Gays Get Around” seems unlikely to be an official detour name in the National Park.
This is from our wiki regarding uploading a gps trace…
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks
nevw (2022-08-28 09:57:18+00:00): I think it would be best to ask OsmAnd questions regarding uploading a gpx to osm on a OsmAnd forum. If not, then ask on our new osm community help site https://community.openstreetmap.org/ and they should be able to assist.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-08-31 17:03:01+00:00): Zprvu se mi to zdá trochu na vandalismus s těmi kategoriemi silnic a jejich povýšení na silnici 1. třídy. Primary je hodnota značky pouze pro státní silnice, pak se secondary pro silnici 2. třídy a tertiary pro silnice 3. třídy. A mnohem lepší je hodnoty silnic vůbec neměnit a zkontrolovat si je, jestli zůstala stejná.
InsertUser (2022-08-28 08:36:09+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMsp.

If you know this because you live nearby we normally say "source=local knowledge".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:source
user_5359 (2022-08-29 10:37:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/4240965. What is the meaning of the tag 722-4 = ساحة حماة ?
نورس الطائر (2022-08-31 07:26:50+00:00): Oh, that should've been name=722-4 thank you for noticing, I just fixed it. Thanks again.
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-30 18:53:51+00:00): What were you trying to do here?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-17 10:33:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126292741 where the changeset comment is: Revert spam - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6371