piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geim (2022-09-13 18:59:54+00:00): Hoi Gnaar,
Je hebt op de Schapenveenweg de tags: 
cycleway:left=track
cycleway:right=no
gezet, terwijl er al een fietspad getekend is. Dit is dubbel.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6411820
Verder loopt de cycleway:left=track zoals je die nu getagd hebt dood op de Ermerweg. Fietsers mogen daar niet links- en rechtsaf noch rechtdoor.
Geim (2022-09-13 18:32:37+00:00): Halo Gnaar, volgens mij is maxspeed:type=NL:urban 50 km/h. Zowel de Stroetweg en de Melkweg liggen in een 30 km/h zone
Stroetweg heb ik al aangepast omdat het 1-richtingsverkeer geworden is.
Geim (2022-09-24 09:48:07+00:00): OK, Gnaar is verwijderd?
messpert (2022-06-20 20:48:21+00:00): Why have you done this. does the road not continue into the court yard? It seem sthat you are removing real information rather than adding detail. Perhaps add the gate and access tags, although I haven't checked those details.
KeithRochester (2022-06-21 07:06:37+00:00): Sorry, I realise now that this changeset and 121934340 are poor quality bad edits. Feel to revert them. Otherwise I'll find out how to do it later in week and do it.
messpert (2022-06-21 12:19:01+00:00): OK. I guess that you are a new mapper, and just getting used to the system. I use josm, so I can't help with iD which is what you seem to be using.

I was only drawn to look at your edits when you deleted a track that I had surveyed without giving any source beyond Bing. It may well be that that track has indeed gone, but it might still exist, but just not be so evident on the images.

Most of your edits seemed to be aimed at restricting access, or removing information, rather than refining it.

Most of ypur changes to private are valid, although I am not entirely sure about the Bromag estate. I know that is probably strictly correct, and that there is a gate and a security guard (or used to be).
But I suggest that access=destination might be better. There are many companies there who presumably need customers to visit, and access=private does suggest that there is no access.
access=destination is compatible with being private, and indeed implies that it is private.

You seem to be concentrating on local farms, so I suspect that you have local knowledge. If so that would be worth noting on source tags and on the changesets.

I think that many of your other access=private might well be better as access=destination for similar reasons for the Bromag Estate. Amazon now use our map for their deliveries (an often also contribute edits, although not always of the highest quality). If Amazon wanted to deliver to the Bromag estate or one of the local farms, they need access = distination I think.

Oh, and welcome to openstreetmap!
KeithRochester (2022-06-24 08:08:58+00:00): Thanks for the pointers. I really appreciate you taking the time.
messpert (2022-06-20 20:43:18+00:00): You have removed a track that I surveyed with gps some years ago. I passed Field Farm earlier today and yesterday, but did not check on the track, since i hadn't noticed your deletion.

You only give Bing as a source: have you visited Field Farm to check?
paulbe (2022-06-23 21:11:19+00:00): This small building, an electrical-power-sub-station, has a BAG-building-id assigned, but not an address (nummerbeschikking / huisnummerbesluit).
Filip009CZ (2025-05-25 17:37:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357498983

Vyslovene zákaz cyklistom tam nevidím. A nemyslím, že pred každým priechodom, by mala byť dopravná značka označujúca, že sa jedná o cyklochodník. Podľa mňa by ten priechod mal mať aspoň bicycle=yes.
aceman444 (2025-05-25 19:36:42+00:00): To, ze tam nie je zakaz, neznamena, ze tam cyklisti mozu. Pokial viem musi byt explicitna znacka, ze tam cyklisti mozu (teda na chodnik). Inak tam nemozu ist ako bicykel. Teda mozu, ale ako chodci (rychlostou chodze). Cize aj ked tam bicycle=yes nie je, mozu tam ist, ale ako chodci.
Nedavame vsade bicycle=yes len preto ze by tam mozno cyklisti chceli ist, alebo ze je tam znacena cyklotrasa. Treba aj zohladnovat dopravne znacenie. Kde date bicycle=yes indikuje mi to, ze na danom useku mozu jazdit plnou rychlostou bicykla.

Aka je tam dnes dopravna znacka? Ja si to uz samozrejme nepamatam, ale ako vidite, dal som tam 'note' ze tam je nejaka znacka, co cyklocestu ukoncuje, a usek priechodu je explicitne znaceny ako 'nie cyklocesta'. Mne sa to teda javi v poriadku. Ale ak sa znacky zmenili, popiste mi co je tam teraz.

A inak je to bezna situacia, ze na priechode je cyklocesta (bicykel v modrom kruhu) ukoncena a za nim zase zacina. Takze podla mna na priechode nesmie cyklista jazdit plnou rychlostou a bud zosadne alebo ide rychlostou chodca.

To, ze cyklisti bezne jazdia rychlo aj po chodnikoch, kde to nemaju povolene, je druha vec.
Filip009CZ (2025-05-25 19:42:39+00:00): No mne podľa značenia viditeľného z Ortofotomozaiky príde, že ten pruh pre cyklistov tam je. Čiže je to v teréne overiteľné, že je tam prechod bicyklom bez zosadnutia povolený vodorovným dopravným značením.
aceman444 (2025-05-25 20:24:59+00:00): Na Ortofoto nevidite dopravne znacky. Ano, cyklopruh (cyklopriechod) tam je, napriek tomu tam boli zvisle znacky, ktore ukoncili "cesticku pre cyklistov".
aceman444 (2025-05-25 20:30:41+00:00): Este aj na useku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066662808 je znacka "zosadni z bicykla".
aceman444 (2025-05-28 20:18:33+00:00): Ale kedze si tam znacenie potencialne odporuje, kludne to prerobte na opacnu stranu (pridajte to bicycle=yes), ale nechajte 'note'.
lumacraft (2022-06-04 11:44:05+00:00): PS : J'ai laissé le nom des deux maisons car les noeuds effacée posséder le noms. 
J'ai seulement remplacé le noeud par le bâtiment.
Harfeur (2022-07-09 21:00:18+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier votre changement, et celui-ci a l'air correct.
Merci beaucoup pour votre aide !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121937394
andi9876 (2022-10-22 01:44:11+00:00): Hello, please stop add artworks and remove this, remember its visible for everybody. Private favorites you can add in an app. Thank you!
BikeForestExplorer (2022-06-09 06:53:48+00:00): Доброг дня, нагадую, у вас квартал зїхав в сторону. Зміщення по мапі Cherkasy 2021 не нульове, а 8.36,6.57
Tesla (2022-06-09 09:18:44+00:00): Этот участник не читает коментарии к своим ченчсетам. Попробуйте пообщаться с ним в личных сообщениях, но он очень упрямый и у него своё видение как всё должно быть.
user_6110846 (2022-06-16 06:15:59+00:00): якщо мапер не читає коменти їгнорить їх то треба писати особисте повідомлення представнику DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck  у особисті повідомлення 
За такий ігнор на Вальдимар накладуть тимчасовий бан
SomeoneElse (2022-06-05 09:47:35+00:00): Hello,
Just checking that the deletion of Dromard Parish here was deliberate?  It was https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10727432/history and was previously https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1j1R .
Best Regards,
Andy
Filip009 (2022-06-04 14:43:28+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávajte si prosím pozor, že čo upravujete. Odstránil ste na ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318844453 tag, že je to cesta. Teraz tadiaľ niekto neprejde.
gymko (2022-06-12 10:35:33+00:00): Ospravedlňujem sa, prepáčte
AlaskaDave (2023-03-30 10:05:33+00:00): Hi Julien,

I was in Doi Inthanon park this morning driving around on the back roads. There is a hamlet that you named Ban Khun Ya (18.4389123, 98.5248006). I believe that hamlet is actually further southwest on that highway. I base that decision on a road sign I photographed that said the town was 12 km distant. When I measured the road segment from that sign it ended in a different town, as yet unnamed, here (18.42927, 98.504549). I believe that is Ban Khun Ya.

Your comment says you read the name from a sign. My guess is that what you saw on the sign wasn't at the town center but perhaps marking the northern-most boundary of Ban Khun Ya. I did not drive all the way there so cannot verify whether it has signage or not but I feel certain the town is where I've indicated.

Interestingly, the highway leading to it has a Kilometer 0 marker right at the junction of the park road that goes to the campground. It is ชม. 7094 which I have tagged as such. It's a funny place for a highway to start IMO but there are many mileposts (metal flags) along the way.

Best,

Dave
julcnx (2023-03-30 14:37:54+00:00): Hey Dave,

Usually, I add source:name=sign when I see a sign at the entrance/exit of a village, but to be honest, I don't really remember this location and didn't upload any ground truth photos to Mapillary at the time (which I do now every time). So, it's quite possible that what you mentioned is correct. Please feel free to change it.

On a side note, during that trip, we were amazed to find that most of the mapped tracks between settlements had been recently paved. There should be many more of these further west, but we were running out of time. As you found out, many of these may have refs and can be upgraded to tertiary.

Cheers,
Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121938813
latvia-bot (2022-06-04 19:23:42+00:00): Erroneously no addresses where added to amenities etc. (only buildings and address points).
latvia-bot (2022-06-14 04:19:36+00:00): Errors corrected by changeset 122350456.
canfe (2022-08-01 09:05:39+00:00): Non si usano le abbreviazioni, pertanto SS va scritto Santi.
literan (2022-06-05 11:28:59+00:00): таки рука была не моя, если смотреть историю съехавшей точки, а вот этого товарища: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118432831
pitfire (2022-06-05 03:55:22+00:00): Hallo legofahrrad,
(note=Eröffnung geplant für 11.10.2019) kann bestimmt gelöscht werden?
legofahrrad (2022-06-05 05:30:50+00:00): Ja, der Sprungraum hat geöffnet. Mit StreetComplete sieht man die ganzen Tags nicht. Daher habe ich auch die Note bisher nicht gesehen.
pitfire (2022-06-05 08:55:00+00:00): done
legofahrrad (2022-06-05 09:04:25+00:00): Super, danke!
pangoSE (2022-06-19 10:16:12+00:00): Godt arbejde! :)
Jolesh (2022-06-19 10:19:10+00:00): Tak :)
Det er den første positiv kommentar jeg har fået. Måske mangler vi lidt at rose hinanden i OSM.
pangoSE (2022-06-19 19:13:28+00:00): Ja, det kan du nok have ret i. Jeg plejer dog at give positiv feedback til nye kortlæggere.
dcapillae (2022-06-04 13:54:55+00:00): No es una importación. JOSM arrastró las etiquetas de un conjunto de cambios anterior.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-05 00:59:36+00:00): Hi, this changeset covers a very large area across multiple countries. In the future, please try to make your changesets smaller
redd (2022-06-05 12:12:50+00:00): +1, if wheelmap_visitor does not react and makes smaller changesets in future then I would suggest a ban of it
jarno_o (2022-06-05 18:29:46+00:00): Do know this is a proxy for anonymous edits made to the map using Wheelmap's editor. Their profile page contains contact information; I suggest using that way first. There's a high probability that, due to the nature of this 'user' (read: proxy), all comments on their changesets remain unread. Besides, I reckon the way they do things has been sorted with OSM staff, otherwise this account would already have gotten plenty of blocks given the account's 28k+ edits. That's not to say these large-area changesets are ideal, far from.
redd (2022-06-05 18:44:51+00:00): Hi jarno_o, 
thanks. I already sent them an email today to read their comments. In my eyes the wheelmap_visitor should only be part of this community if it participates actively and reviews their changesets for misbehaviour. 
The general recommondation is, that changesets should be local. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
EnumMapper (2022-06-05 20:17:01+00:00): It should commit changeset per poi or by certain area size.
holgerd (2022-06-09 19:13:13+00:00): Hi, I’m the co-founder of Wheelmap and responsible for this. Firstly, on behalf of the whole Wheelmap project: Our apologies, we strive to be good OSM community members!

We are aware that large changesets are a problem and working on fixing it. Please find our plans and the status here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329

The reason we did not reply earlier is, that I made one embarrassing mistake: The “wheelmap_visitor” user profile had an outdated e-mail address, so I did not get notifications and I did not notice this. I fixed it now and made sure all changeset comments in the future will be answered by me or our community management team.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-09 19:48:08+00:00): Ok, thanks for your reply!
Scout Jens (2025-11-25 07:46:48+00:00): Hallo plexi32, 
Ich bin über Zugangsberechtigungen gestolpert, die Du eingetragen hattest. "agricultural" ist wohl Kontext, aber nicht für alle Nutzer. Ich habe es gelöscht und bei Fahrzeugen eingetragen. Bitte darauf achten, weil der betreffende Weg sonst auf für Fahrräder und Wanderer gesperrt ist. 
Vielen Dank und Grüße, Jens
user_6110846 (2022-06-04 14:58:04+00:00): телеграм канал Декомунізація.Україна
abakus_uploader (2022-06-04 22:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
arte2002 (2022-06-08 19:43:14+00:00): Hola VLanzarote

Cambiaste el nombre de la autovía por el de la referencia, lo cual no es correcto, puedes revisar la wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

Revierto los cambios

Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-13 12:39:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade3e
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245292752/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade3
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Artasen (2024-03-15 18:12:54+00:00): Fixed the typo
InfosReseaux (2022-10-08 23:21:56+00:00): Bonjour

Pourquoi avoir retiré operator=* sur les supports svp?
C'est une information importante, qui ne correspond pas systématiquement à l'exploitant de la ligne
Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Exploitants

Est-ce possible de rétablir s'il vous plaît ?

Bonne soirée
user_8101879 (2022-10-09 18:27:01+00:00): Bonjour,

comme indiqué dans le commentaire de ce changeset, l'information est déjà sur les lignes donc redondante.
Le jour où les poteaux ne seront plus gérés par Enedis (probablement jamais, selon moi, car si une ligne tombe en panne à cause d'un mauvais entretien sur un poteau géré par un autre cela sera très conflictuel), il conviendra en effet de rajouter cette information mais là elle est totalement inutile.

Bonne journée
InfosReseaux (2022-10-09 21:05:17+00:00): Bonsoir,

Ce n'est pas le bon raisonnement : ces poteaux sont des supports de plusieurs lignes (dont des lignes électriques Enedis). Ce sont deux choses différentes.
On peut y trouver des lignes Orange, à minima télécom d'autres exploitants.
La déduction de l'exploitant du support ne peut pas être faite en passant par ce qui est supporté.
Pour éviter toute ambiguïté, il est préférable d'avoir operator=* sur lignes et supports.
L'information était originalement présente, je passe beaucoup de temps à tenir tout ça en cohérence, est-ce possible de le rétablir s'il vous plaît ?

Bonne soirée
user_8101879 (2022-10-11 19:18:22+00:00): Fait
user_8101879 (2022-10-11 19:19:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127376987
InfosReseaux (2022-10-11 21:08:51+00:00): Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris le temps !

Je pense que les éléments d'explications donnés ici seront utiles pour comprendre ce qui est en cours
https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr/projects/2021-01_poteaux

Bonne soirée
user_8101879 (2022-11-02 19:27:20+00:00): Si je comprends bien, tu fais (gracieusement) le travail qui devrait être fait par une entreprise privée (Enedis) avec pour objectif les aider à maintenir leur réseau.
Sais tu que l'esclavage (travailler gratuitement pour un patron) a été aboli il y a presque de 2 siècles ?
Je trouve ce projet particulièrement révoltant.
InfosReseaux (2022-11-02 21:00:16+00:00): Tu comprends mal.
Les réseaux de distribution électrique sont publics, le patrimoine des collectivités territoriales (L.322-4 du code de l'énergie).
Un millier de contributeurs s'investit en ce moment pour décrire un patrimoine commun, exploité par un acteur privé par concession.
Nous n'avons ni engagement ni compte à rendre. L'accord conclu entre osm france et enedis est équilibré, avec fourniture de photos aériennes et enrichissement de l'opendata par leurs soins, via des données produites par leurs inspections de terrain.
https://data.enedis.fr/explore/dataset/position-geographique-des-poteaux-hta-et-bt/

C'est le plus gros projet de France pour installer les usages d'OSM au sein d'une entreprise et inciter le plus d'acteurs à contribuer.
Il a par ailleurs coûté plus de 10 ans d'engagement bénévole pour aboutir la forme qu'il a aujourd'hui.
Je trouve la référence à l'esclavage particulièrement déplacée et blessante. 
Croire que les choses se font en assenant "qu'ils ont qu'à le faire" est loin de la réalité. On a du pain sur la planche.
pitfire (2022-06-05 06:09:35+00:00): Hallo Morgan81,

Ladestationen haben keine Namen.
(Schließfächer für z.B. EBike Akkus)

Eine gute Möglichkeit ist:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Rastede_Ladesaeule_Gesamtansicht.jpg

amenity=charging_station
operator=*
capacity=*
socket:schuko=*
bicycle=yes
motorcar=no
covered=no
fee=no
opening_hours=24/7
pitfire (2022-06-05 06:18:14+00:00): Hallo Morgan81,

Ladestationen haben keine Namen.
Siehe: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de#Tags_die_in_diesem_Zusammenhang_gebraucht_werden
Hidoo00 (2023-04-25 20:51:10+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066709847 as build=yes. Is it a typo of building, or what is it supposed to be?
Best regards
DaveF (2022-06-05 12:23:57+00:00): Hi
If the pub is closed and he disused: prefix is used, the amenity tag should be used.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231083595
eggie (2022-06-04 16:30:50+00:00): Dag Bauke  Je vraagt feedback..

Openbaar groen blijkt lastig.
Vaak wordt er (oneigenlijk) dan leisure=garden gebruikt.
Dat rendert in ieder geval.
Tegenwoordig is er een nieuwe tag 
natural=shrubbery..  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery

Maar ja.. de aanvraag naar de rendering loopt nog.
Je bankje zit vast aan de highway=pedestrian.. Dat zou je nog even los kunnen maken. 
landuse=flowerbed zie je ook wel eens
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed
Mapse en up to you  
eggie
eggie (2022-06-04 16:31:38+00:00): Maar zo ziet het er in ieder geval goed uit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-04 17:58:44+00:00): note: someone started public mailing list thread ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-June/thread.html#87549 ) to complain about this edit instead of using changeset comment
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-04 19:12:50+00:00): That is because Andy Townsend abused his DWG powers and blocked me from adding a comment here.
mmd (2022-06-04 19:35:02+00:00): Andy Townsend didn't abuse any DWG powers here. It's nothing more than a bug in the Rails port that still needs to be fixed: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3522#issuecomment-1095464792

That's really the only reason, why you couldn't comment here. Nothing else.
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-04 19:41:12+00:00): Well, I did get a blocking message, so it was intentional.
mmd (2022-06-04 19:43:07+00:00): I think you didn't get my point: even though you've been blocked, you would have still been able to comment on this changeset. Because of a bug I've mentioned earlier, this isn't possible at the moment.
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-04 19:49:50+00:00): Ah, ok. Thank you for a clarification.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-27 18:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124152916 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for adding nonsense to OSM and vandalising OSM.
lyctkel (2022-10-09 20:41:54+00:00): Hi eteb3,
recycling=plastic;paper;bottles at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9795033504 looks unusual and is used only once at OSM.
Did you mean
recycling:plastic=yes
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:glass_bottles=yes  ?
Regards,
lyctkel
eteb3 (2022-10-10 21:02:16+00:00): Hi, yes that's what I wanted to say. I thought multiple tags would be ok.
lyctkel (2022-10-11 07:44:24+00:00): Hi,
years ago, that would have been my guess as well, but things are more sophisticated now:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
I have changed the tag now.
Regards,
lyctkel
eteb3 (2022-10-12 18:26:46+00:00): Thanks very much.
user_5359 (2022-06-06 13:05:01+00:00): Hello! Please correct your typo of roof:type and check also the value of this key.
bxl-forever (2022-06-16 15:26:17+00:00): Hello,

How about adding oneway:bicycle=yes?

We do this sometimes, to make human review of one-way streets much easier, i.e. we know that the situation was already examined and that there was definitely no M2/M3 sign.

Hope this helps.
jeslop (2022-06-19 10:05:43+00:00): Saludos Vlanzarote. 

En el cementerio no se pueden incluir los nichos ni como "house" ("Una sola unidad habitacional, normalmente ocupada por una única  familia, ya sea propiamente una familia o un pequeño grupo de personas que comparten los espacios comunes de la casa y la cocina", como recoge la wiki) ni como "roof" (building=roof se emplea para edificios que están abiertos en al menos dos de sus lados, también en la wiki).

Esto debe ser corregido.

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-27 18:16:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124152916 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for adding nonsense to OSM and vandalising OSM.
SHARCRASH (2022-06-04 16:14:19+00:00): + new elements
SHARCRASH (2022-06-04 16:14:25+00:00): oops...
wireguy (2022-06-06 20:55:15+00:00): Unggo99, can you check relation 2163724, Everglades and Francis S. Taylor Wildlife Management Area?  It's broken where it crosses L-28, probably deleting node/1735266821
Unggo99 (2022-06-07 02:07:14+00:00): Hi Wireguy, just fixed and closed the Everglades and Francis S. Taylor Wildlife Management Area relation. Thank you for telling me.
ivanbranco (2022-06-06 16:27:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588429472/history

Hi Jorenasco,

what's the meaning of height=2 for a natural=grassland? Also place=hamlet is used here only. Is not needed, the cottage is already rappresented as a building.
parsd51 (2022-06-05 15:43:04+00:00): Hej

Hvorfor ændrer du ref rækkefølgen?

Hilsen
parsd51
DK7080BE (2022-06-05 16:36:15+00:00): Rækkefølgen var før forskellig på Damhaven og på Fredericiavej. Jeg har ændret rækkefølgen på Fredericiavej  så de ikke længere er forskellige.
DK7080BE (2022-06-05 16:43:09+00:00): Her er/var rækkefølgen på Damhaven: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92407491
parsd51 (2022-06-05 17:57:55+00:00): Ok, tak.

Jeg synes rækkefølgen skal være med den højest klassificerede vej først, dvs.:
primary ref; secondary non local ref; major local curcuit ref; minor local curcuit ref. 

Det er også det jeg synes der generelt mappes og allerede var tagget, så rettelsen synes jeg skal være “omvendt”.

Den højest klassificerede vej er sandsynligvis den der bruges af flest og jeg synes derfor den skal have forrang.
DK7080BE (2022-06-06 18:16:51+00:00): Foretrækker du:
28 170 O1 O2
eller
28 170 O2 O1
?