piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-01 20:04:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-03-02 09:12:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
eggie (2018-03-01 21:02:05+00:00): Dag Sjoerd..  De niet doorgaande straten kun je taggen met highway=residential. 
Dat veel binnenstraten nog op unclassified staan komt nog door een import-donatie van kaartenmaker AND. Je kunt de binnenstraten dus gewoon aanpassen.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-03-02 10:30:24+00:00): I can understand the reasoning behind making some tools stop complaining, but this school almost certainly has *an* address. It might not have a house number, but it *must* be possible for them to get post.
ent8r (2018-03-02 16:01:08+00:00): But why does it have no housenumber? Without a number you can't get post anyway...
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-03-03 14:58:55+00:00): > Without a number you can't get post anyway...

Er.... You're not familiar with Irish addresses are you?

35% of addresses are shared/duplicate, usually in places where housenumbers aren't used.
ent8r (2018-03-03 15:01:10+00:00): I'm from Germany... :) Sorry for that!
Actually in Germany every house has to have a number and it can't be duplicate or shared with another house... Your system is pretty confusing, isn't it?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-03-03 15:14:11+00:00): Yes it is confusing. :)

There's a new postcode system which gives every address a unique number which can help with this.
ent8r (2018-03-03 15:16:50+00:00): Ah... OK. I removed the "noaddress=yes" tag again and if the address is finally known you or somebody else can add the real address!
freebeer (2018-03-02 06:25:49+00:00): Hallo,
It seems here you have deleted a GIS extensive building outline covering a larger area that can be seen visible in the aerial imageries, and replaced it with an inaccurately-positioned area (not a building) only covering a small part of the full outline.
You have also added a node with nothing but a name which does not describe the function of this amputated building.
Note that I have measured the offset from the lousy satellite imagery you have used, as being nearly 9 metres off compared to more accurately aligned aerial overflights, not to mention GIS data, so you should have first adjusted that background to match the nearby buildings (or better, use a different imagery source that is clearer and better aligned to start with).
Constable (2018-03-02 17:27:42+00:00): ciao Fede, occhio che (se non sbaglio) nella modifica è andato perso il nome della scuola.
Il vecchio nodo indicava "Scuola media Calvino".
Ti ho scritto solo perché magari ti sei dimenticato di riportare il nome.
Grazie per la collaborazione, ciao!
fedc (2018-03-02 17:50:59+00:00): Sì, hai ragione. Grazie
Constable (2018-03-02 18:28:42+00:00): ciao, di nulla!
user_5359 (2018-03-02 09:10:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! I have divide your entry in booth keys (please check this). Also I added some buildings from aerial images. Please move your node from the property to main building!
user_5359 (2018-03-02 09:02:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Exists these time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-02 04:21:42+00:00): name=* should be the main name.  oneway=yes doesn't quite make sense on the other way.  I can get this fixed up, but can you clarify what was meant here so I have it clear?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56800395
Digne (2018-03-02 16:57:25+00:00): Hello JanV,

What is the current status of the bus route? Right now it still follows the Woudseweg.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Digne (2018-03-02 16:59:17+00:00): It faces in the right direction now indeed. In general though, one way roads don't really need a traffic_light direction, as traffic only flows one way.
MikeN (2018-03-01 23:33:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Everything looks great but the opening hours syntax is specialized so that Apps can read the opening hours directly.   I have updated the opening hours according to the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
eggie (2018-03-01 22:41:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Warning.. you attached an addressnode to a administrative boundery. It belongs to a building nearby. The cause is moveing the map in editmodus.
Please don't shft with the map in edit modus. I wil fix it.
eggie (2018-03-01 22:43:20+00:00): This was your edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56801197
eggie (2018-03-01 22:46:23+00:00): fixed
eggie (2018-03-01 22:52:33+00:00): Better tag those sideroads as highway=residential. 
The reason the area of this changeset is this big is because you attached the addressnode to the boundery. An area this big is an indication something went wrong.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
aseerel4c26 (2018-03-02 20:16:36+00:00): Zur Info: In Dietzenbach revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56831567
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Aleks-Berlin (2018-03-02 08:41:23+00:00): Hi km2bp, please follow the OSM wiki for wikipedia-tag. wikipedia="pl:Name" not "http.."
Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Awikipedia
Affected Item:  way/209341765
Thanks, Alex
km2bp (2018-03-06 17:16:23+00:00): Ok
PierZen (2018-03-06 19:20:52+00:00): Merci de contribuer à OSM. L'ortographe des noms au Québec est selon la commission de toponymie. Rue avec R majuscule.
Digne (2018-03-04 12:59:45+00:00): Hallo Josbert Lonnee,

Ik had hier nog even naar gekeken omdat er om feedback was gevraagd. 

Het ziet er naar mijn mening goed uit. Normaal gesproken zou ik geen paden op een vlak van een parkeerplaats verbinden, maar in dit geval valt er wel wat voor de zeggen omdat het nog al moeilijk intekenen is door het gebouw er boven.
Digne (2018-03-04 13:00:30+00:00): Overigens als het om een fietsenstalling gaat onder het gebouw is het misschien handig de parkeerplaats op te delen in een deel voor auto's en een deel voor fietsers.
Josbert Lonnee (2018-03-04 13:03:27+00:00): De autoparkeerplaats liep voor de wijzigingen ook al onder het gebouw door. Maar wel mee eens.
felipeeugenio (2018-05-16 18:35:11+00:00): Hola
El tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto. 
saludos
spark (2018-09-03 10:17:58+00:00): The highway=construction between the M5 junction and highwood lane looks odd, was this intended?
ndm (2018-09-03 22:26:44+00:00): Yes.

At the time it was added there was a general linear track with construction vehicles on it.  Don't know what was being constructed -- needs a survey :-)
stefanct (2021-06-10 12:56:49+00:00): Wo kommen die Namen her?
goaned (2023-02-11 21:52:50+00:00): Ich wiederhole die Frage von stefanct. Ich bin geneigt, sie wieder zu entfernen, ich war schon oft in meinem Leben dort und "Rechter Donaudamm" hätte ich nie irgendwo angeschrieben gesehen.
stefanct (2023-02-11 21:57:08+00:00): Ich glaube, wir werden da weder eine Antwort bekommen, noch sollten wir das so stehen lassen... also tu dir bitte keinen Zwang an und schmeiß es weg :)
MeckerZiege (2023-02-11 22:49:29+00:00): Die Namen habe ich damals aus dem wien.gv.at Stadtplan entnommen. Wo sie dort genau zu finden waren kann ich 5 Jahre später natürlich nicht mehr sagen. Jedenfalls enthalten die Spielplätze in dem Bereich auch heute noch im Stadtplan diese Bezeichnung.
Digne (2018-03-04 13:01:17+00:00): Hier heb ik niets op aan te merken.
felipeeugenio (2018-03-02 17:47:33+00:00): Estimado
por favor confirmar la presencia de este parque acá. no se ve nada en la foto satelital.
saludos
user_5359 (2018-03-02 08:48:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of a parking area, please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
Simon Barber (2021-03-19 22:12:34+00:00): Where did the elevation data come from? And why was the description removed?
wambacher (2021-03-19 23:37:08+00:00): no idea - did you see the date?
wambacher (2021-03-19 23:37:34+00:00): or check the history
dkeith45 (2018-03-02 00:08:45+00:00): Since the advent of online maps, this location has been misidentified by several sources. Built in the 1950's, this old highway motel, has always had the street address of 20104 Wicker Ave. Lowell, IN. 46356. The past few years, because of online maps showing incorrect locations for this address have resulted in emergency services going to the middle of corn fields where there is no structure, or to the mobile home park one half mile south. Package deliveries have also been misdirected because of online map sites refusing to alter their incorrect information. Despite my attempts to force this particular map program to alter this address to the correct one, it still erroneously says this location is in North Hayden, IN. And North Hayden is actually three miles north and east of here.
EugenyN (2018-03-02 17:17:03+00:00): исправте тег на office https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office

видеостудия это не tourism=attraction !
EugenyN (2018-03-02 17:17:13+00:00): *исправьте
user_5359 (2018-03-02 05:56:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you have a look on the Mapbox aerial images (fourth icon inside the id editor)?
user_5359 (2018-03-02 05:44:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to booth areas. If you need help you are welcome!
geoaria (2018-03-02 09:21:48+00:00): در شرق اصفهان بخشی از مسیر secondary را به primary تغییر داده اید. لطفا در ویرایش های خود دقت کنید.

نقشه های osm بوم نقاشی نیست که هر تغییری خواستید اعمال کنید . خواهشمند است قبل از هر گونه ادیت نقشه ، قوانین و شیوه کار در نقشه های osm  را مطالعه فرمایید.

اشتباه شما توسط osmi پیگیری و رفع گردید.
freebeer (2018-03-02 06:12:49+00:00): Hallo,
In this changeset you have deleted a number of TIGER import residential roads.
However a quick look at the various aerial imageries show me that some of them are fairly to quite visible and many probably should have been re-tagged as a track instead of the default TIGER assigned, rather than being deleted entirely,  and perhaps better aligned to the path shown in the aerials.
viloan (2018-03-02 03:52:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-03-02 05:23:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice, there exists also a tag leisure=dog_park
user_7663646 (2018-03-02 04:12:00+00:00): Great job
user_5359 (2018-03-02 05:07:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint: We didn't need a relation, if the relation has only one member.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-12 22:10:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mmahmud (2018-03-02 04:54:13+00:00): Hi, why removing the tag natural = coastline and the name = Kome ?
Palolo (2018-03-02 05:29:53+00:00): The tags apparently were removed in resolving a conflict.
mmahmud (2018-03-02 05:30:27+00:00): Thanks for the reply. I will fix it then.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
save2desk (2018-06-24 17:30:02+00:00): Я позапрошлой осенью и прошлой весной ездил по удалённым лесным дорогам. Их точно нужно было актуализировать?
Sel1 (2018-08-02 13:47:29+00:00): Этот ванлад похоже ничего не проверяет на местности и удаляет все подряд. Рекомендую на него пожаловаться
freeExec (2018-03-03 14:13:09+00:00): А откуда вы берёте адреса?
user_5359 (2018-03-02 09:37:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your area. What do you want to achieve with your entry?
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
freebeer (2018-03-02 05:52:19+00:00): Hallo,
You seem to have carved out part of a basin in order to create a park in an area which has been the subject of extensive discussion.
Let me draw your attention to the contents of the following note tag applying to this entire area:
note	DO NOT TAG THINGS FOR THE RENDERER! It's a drainage basin and should be tagged as such. I know, it looks ugly. But that's Mapnik's fault, not ours.
I suspect that this park, like the others, are located within the basin proper and as such the basin outline should not be cut away.
antiviro (2018-03-02 16:14:42+00:00): Then shouldn't the West Houston Airport, basically all the businesses and subdivisions in the area also fit under that same concept? The basin is carved out for some developed land, but not others? It seems rather inconsistent.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
freebeer (2018-03-03 02:28:49+00:00): Hallo,
I am going to reply here to your comment in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/56807998 because here I see a large island of dry land newly carved out from the basin area Addicks Reservoir, along with a few highways.
the problem here and in the parks you carved out there, is that they can be clearly seen all to be under mucky brown water in satellite imagery of 31.08.2017.
What your changes are implying is that (which I doubt) there have been massive earthmoving projects to add several metres elevation to the roads and the park areas to elevate them out of the flood-susceptible basin as defined.
The aeroport, also seen to be underwater, lies on the other side of an administrative boundary which, without looking at the entire history of the area, may be the basis along with the marked Addicks Dam area, of defining the basin.
I see here that the Reservoir is in its 39th iteration of change, along with the need for the note= added to it, so I am reluctant to take the present heavily-edited boundary as representative of its original intent in OSM.
Unfortunately, the satellite imagery from 30.08.2017 that covers the southwest area where a residential area appears dry today in OSM, has too much cloud cover over top of what looks to me also to be mucky floodwater.
antiviro (2018-03-03 04:05:47+00:00): Satellite imagery taken half a year ago during Hurricane Harvey? Your using imagery from a hurricane that was unprecedented in this region? That couldn't be a more extreme outlier. My edits imply that developed land is treated consistently, without preferential treatment given to cooperate, residential, or recreational. 

What are you viewing the historical map data from six months ago on?
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:20:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:12:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-03 00:46:09+00:00): The D should have been moved to addr:unit=*, but I'm afraid I'm a little confused on how name:it=* comes into play on this particular gelateria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56808304
Humus015 (2018-03-03 04:20:38+00:00): Tomorrow I will visit, but from the map looks like also the position is wrong outside the buiding area. Also the name is changed. I will update.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-03 04:23:33+00:00): It's been about a year since I mapped that while I was walking down from my office if the time to find some breakfast.  Can't say Im a fan of Hurts Donut after that.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Carnildo (2018-03-02 09:48:41+00:00): I'm not sure all of these were using "grade" to mean "tracktype".  For example, an asphalt surface in excellent condition is hardly a "grade3" tracktype.
thetornado76 (2018-03-02 14:07:35+00:00): I had changed only grade=x to tracktype=gradex. If there not highway=track maybe grade=x is wrong and can removed.
If surface=asphalt you are right there is grade3 wrong.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-03 00:48:14+00:00): I fixed phone and addr:street on this to meet standard OSM conventions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56808429
Humus015 (2018-03-03 04:22:25+00:00): ok.