piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VA00 (2023-02-01 12:00:23+00:00): Czyli faktycznie Kuba517 skasował zarówno wyspę, jak i mielizny dookoła. Ciekawe czemu. Jeszcze rozumiem mielizny, jak jest wysoki poziom wody to ich nie widać na orto, ale wyspa jest prawie zawsze.
NorthCrab (2023-02-01 12:17:38+00:00): Mogę Ci ją przywrócić, tylko powiedz które konkretnie elementy chcesz. Bo jeszcze wcześniej załączyłem ten inny zestaw co też coś usuwał.
4004 (2021-12-08 21:48:17+00:00): Здавтсвуйте, я вас уже просил как то описывать ваши правки - можете это сделать в комментариях
Sandal man (2021-12-11 18:58:52+00:00): Hola, creo que cometiste un error aquí.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010341288#map=19/41.65445/1.90460
eggie (2021-12-08 20:35:37+00:00): Dag Xyberion
Tip: 
oneway=no hoef je niet op reguliere wegen te taggen.
Wanneer er een fietsverbod is middels een bord dan is het bicycle=no  Staat er geen bord dan gebruiken we bicycle=use_sidepath.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-08 20:37:36+00:00): Dag Xyberion..  Zo te zien aan de belijning klopt oneway=yes hier niet.
Wat is je bron?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-08 20:43:52+00:00): Ik heb oneway=no weer toegevoegd. De voorgaande mapper is zeer ervaren. De belijning duidt op tweerichting. Het zal te maken hebben met het pad dat er vanuit het westen op uitkomt.
MVG
eggie
Xyberion (2021-12-08 20:55:11+00:00): Excuus, dit is inderdaad tweerichtingsverkeer. Echter doordat je aan de zuidkant alleen linksaf kan slaan wordt het effectief als eenrichtingsverkeer gebruikt. Vandaar mijn verwarring.

Groet

Wouter
eggie (2021-12-08 21:02:27+00:00): Logisch..   
Eigenlijk dus onlogisch.. Het zal te maken hebben met de bewoners aan de westkant... Die hebben vast ook een fiets. :)

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-09 06:50:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CrisR87 (2021-12-08 20:35:09+00:00): https://www.ovb-online.de/muehldorf/waldkraiburg/neue-heimat-fuer-menschen-mit-handicap-in-waldkraiburg-ist-endlich-bezugsfertig-90176494.html
Heinz_V (2022-01-11 08:14:48+00:00): You made correction to NH24: 
each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD220 (2022-01-11 14:27:50+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I added the relations back as suggested. Thank you.
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-01 03:50:26+00:00): Hi Heejin_K,
You did a great job. Due to the problem of spiky buildings at https://maproulette.org/challenge/30235/task/142649038 also based on Maxar and Bing Aerial Imagery, I found that this object overlapping and spiky buildings. So I have to fix it.
Thank you
Happy mapping
4004 (2022-04-17 15:10:50+00:00): hi, is this no longer operated by Amazon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133318583 ?
Nadjita (2022-08-13 06:35:02+00:00): Eigentlich meint building=terrace, dass es sich um eine Ansammlung von nicht näher getrennten Reihenhäusern handelt. Man nutzt das, wenn man z.B. einen gesamten Häuserblock umrahmt, diesen aber nicht in einzelne Häuser zerlegt. Wenn man jedes einzelne Haus meint, nimmt man building=house
Siehe Wiki
EP_Repair (2022-02-11 16:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117265610 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits, including adding unreal golf courses. User did not respond to changeset comments requesting them to map golf courses properly.
abakus_uploader (2021-12-08 23:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
श्रीवत्स (2021-12-08 22:24:39+00:00): Hi Ballincolla,

Pairc na Sráide is partly overbuilt. Do you really think it should be tagged with landuse=farmland and not a historic tag?
blackboxlogic (2021-12-14 02:48:15+00:00): FYI I've updated this to be "building=static_caravan" which isn't local vernacular but is the osm standard.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114717770
tg4567 (2022-05-14 19:00:16+00:00): There is now a new building next to it, right?
Peer van Daalen (2022-05-14 19:41:31+00:00): Pardon! I don't know. I haven't been in this area for a long time.
tg4567 (2022-05-27 22:31:14+00:00): Yes, there is a construction right next to it.  I added it.  From the outside it like it's close to being completed.
eggie (2021-12-09 07:41:43+00:00): correct
pintoch (2021-12-20 10:04:54+00:00): Danke schön, das war schnell! :)
wkdgs (2021-12-09 09:35:01+00:00): Hi,

der Weg war korrekt als (private) Grundstückszufahrt gemappt. Ich hab mal angenommen, dass die Zufahrt tatsächlich existiert und hab sie daher wieder hinzugefügt.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114718189
DD1GJ (2021-12-10 11:34:58+00:00): Originalen Eintrag wieder hergestellt und Zufahrt als privat gekennzeichnet. 

Hallo toohighpace,

der Eintrag stammte von Amazon Logistics, die damit die Tourenplanung ihrer Zusteller optimieren. Auch andere Lieferdienste profitieren davon.

Zudem nutzen inzwischen die meisten Rettungsleitstellen OSM zur Einsatzplanung. Da sind solche Eintragungen extrem wichtig, um schon bei der Anfahrt zu wissen, wie man an zurückliegende Häuser (32a) herankommt.

Grüße, Joachim
toohighpace (2021-12-10 12:00:35+00:00): Dann sollte man hier mehr auf die Anwohner hören, als auf irgendwelche GPS-Tracker der Amazon-Fahrer.

Kompromissvorschlag: Habe den Weg eingekürzt, bis zur Haustür. Das sollte für _jeden_ die erste Anlaufstelle nach Betreten des Grundstücks sein.
eggie (2021-12-09 07:40:49+00:00): correct
kawino85 (2021-12-09 11:27:26+00:00): Never heard of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area ?
ottwiz (2021-12-09 12:10:20+00:00): I know that, but that doesn't fit the definition. It's a long recurring question, because according to a local(asdfjkll), it's not a nature_reserve nor a protected area. It's a State Park, a one of its kind.
eggie (2021-12-09 07:10:53+00:00): Dag Xyberion,

Editor iD heeft de onhebbelijke gewoonte om objecten te verschuiven als je met de kaart scrollt in editmodus.
Dus beter niet schuiven of niet eeerst iets selecteren en dan schuiven.
Adresnode 73 ligt nu ergens anders.
Het is niet automatisch bicycle=use_sidepath. Wanneer het bv een G13 fietspad is geldt dit niet.
De vraag is dus welk type fietspad is het?

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-09 07:16:27+00:00): Maar hier G12a  Dus correct gedaan.
Het adres heb ik hersteld.
eggie (2021-12-09 07:18:24+00:00): Toch niet helemaal correct. De routering is verbroken, want je hebt bij nr 69 bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd terwijl er maar aan één kant een fietspad is.
Let hier op, want zo gaat de routering verloren.
Zoiets doe je met forward of backward tags
eggie (2021-12-09 07:20:02+00:00): De tagging is overigens bicycle=use_sidepath   en niet sidepaths..
Elk begin is moeilijk :)
eggie (2021-12-09 07:23:02+00:00): bicycle = use_sidepath heb ik verwijderd, want er loopt een fietsroute overheen.
Eerst zal de fietsroute verplaatst moeten worden.
eggie (2021-12-09 10:08:14+00:00): Fietsknooppuntroute 1 - 62 verlegd naar parallelfietspaden.. bicycle =use_sidepath toegevoegd.
(Met editor iD is dat overigens niet te doen.. met josm wel. )
Bij Gelderstraat 69
bicycle:backward=use_sidepath toegevoegd. Dus met de richting van de weg mee staat dan het kleine stukje niet op slot. Met de richting van de weg mee wel. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-09 11:38:47+00:00): typo.. tegen de richting wordt de routering naar het fietspad geleid.
eggie (2021-12-09 06:55:02+00:00): Reverted due to vandalism by changeset  · #114728503
eggie (2021-12-09 06:53:51+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by changeset #114728467
eggie (2021-12-09 07:56:51+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2021-12-09 07:32:05+00:00): Niet correct..
Het is bicycle=use_sidepath (Niet meervoud)
Ik heb het aangepast
Gr eggie
rmikke (2021-12-28 18:28:23+00:00): Ale z tym highway=residential dla drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656593245#map=17/50.78307/22.40037 lecącej przez pola, z której nawet nie widać domostw, do których prowadzi, to przesadziłeś :)

Zmieniłem na unclassified
eggie (2021-12-09 07:36:02+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114719433

bicycle=use_sidepath  !! Op de kruising. Ik pas het aan.
upperkees (2021-12-28 16:36:02+00:00): The Thermenradweg is still missing it's relation to the EV9, at least to the point that the EV9 doesn't show up on the map.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2021-12-28 17:11:16+00:00): Hi,
The OSM standard map does not render relations of the type superroute. You can see the EV9 for example on Waymarked Trail: https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2766147
SafetyIng (2021-12-16 13:05:58+00:00): Hey,
dieser Changeset ist relativ riesig. Mit ein paar Stichproben sind mir schon paar Fehler in deinem Changeset aufgefallen. 
Ich würde mich heute Abend dann hinsetzen und das mal durcharbeiten und durchgucken.
Für mich sieht es adhoc erstmal so aus, als ob du nur die "Hinweise/Warnungen" von iD übernommen hast...
Vielleicht finden wir ja insgesamt eine Lösung....
SafetyIng (2021-12-18 13:36:58+00:00): Hey, ich habe jetzt mal durchgearbeitet und folgende Fehler gefunden:

Warum wurden an den Objekten eine Adresse hinzugefügt:
Way 8090154 
Way 197527323 
Node 1300921987 
Node 4680365989 

Die Kennzeichnung von McFit (Way 50740329) am gesamten Gebäude ist ja eigentlich falsch, da nicht das komplette Gebäude umfassend. Somit eigentlich als Node notwendig und nicht am ganzen Gebäude.

Dann verschiedene Anpassungen durch den Name-Suggestion-Index. Manche Änderungen sind einfach falsch, manche wurden auch nur falsch vorgeschlagen. Ich würde mich da die Tage drum kümmern, manche Verbesserungen wurden schon eingepflegt. 

Bei den Elementen mit bus_stop bin ich nicht so sicher, die muss ich mir nochmal angucken. Denn public_transport=platform und highway=bus_stop gehört eigentlich nicht zusammen, da ja schon ein Busstop markiert wurde....
SafetyIng (2021-12-18 13:43:10+00:00): In way 638183230 wurde blindlings ein landuse gesetzt, der so falsch ist.

Warum wurde das not:network:wikidata vergeben?

Wahrscheinlich durch den NSI wurden die Nodes 1130088422 und 8777315407 falsch betitelt.

shop=public_transport_tickets  ist "falsch". Dafür gibt es die Kombi shop=tickets + tickets=public_transport

substation=yes ist Schwachsinn, wenn muss schon der Typus angegeben werden

Beispiel Node 1501271259 ; Wenn shop=boutique zu shop=clothes geändert wird, sollte die Bekleidungsart als clothes=* angegeben werden

die gesamten area=yes die gelöscht wurden.

bei railway=disused bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob die wirklich alles nur disused sind....

Warum wurde der node 985973597 nicht gelöscht?

Warum bei WAY: 88384777 Wikidata-Elemente gelöscht?


Ich würde mich über eine auseinandersetzung mit den Elementen freuen und erwarte schon freudig deine Rückmeldung
compdude (2021-12-16 03:44:44+00:00): Hi, please don't tag roads as motorway unless there are at least two consecutive interchanges. I will be changing this back to trunk.
kapazao (2021-12-09 10:21:21+00:00): Hola, por favor no uses restricciones de giro que en realidad no existen. Las restricciones de giro en U solo deben ponerse si hay una señal que así lo indique.
No se tiene que poner cada corte o cruce de vías una prohibición de giro en U puesto que es redundante.
Revertiré este conjunto de cambios.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114719752
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:50:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274210
rickmastfan67 (2024-01-28 22:56:41+00:00): Please don't add 'unsigned' highway route numbers in the 'ref' tag.

SR-32 is hidden under US-25 and not signed.  When tagging an unsigned route number, it goes in the 'unsigned_ref' tag.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:30:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317108
FenrirXIII (2021-12-09 12:03:03+00:00): Correction: PolMart
mueschel (2021-12-12 11:06:53+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange fuel tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634365517
Rhodez (2021-12-12 13:20:56+00:00): Fixed, thanks for the comment mueschel!
ottwiz (2021-12-08 23:46:47+00:00): + detailed a park
ottwiz (2021-12-09 00:14:40+00:00): I also used TIGER Roads 2020 if some road names have changed but if not, i only edited the names from Dr => Drive, Rd => Road etc
gscholz (2021-12-13 09:24:40+00:00): Hi Lucas,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of at least "Barbalha", "Juazeiro do Norte" and "São José":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-39.43996&lat=-7.32732&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114721258

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
lonnez (2021-12-09 00:40:28+00:00): Did you mean to add two cinemas here? I assume you probably meant only the more eastern one.
DavidKarlas (2022-10-27 04:07:45+00:00): Hi,
was it intentional that node 703173837 had name renamed from "Carauta" to 	"|"?
JLOSM (2022-11-01 18:46:57+00:00): It was not intention.
It's already fixed.
Thanks for your notice.
Enock4seth (2021-12-09 21:51:53+00:00): Hi Kofi Sammy, 
the changeset comment is not to be only hashtags, please kindly see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ElliottPlack (2021-12-09 17:19:43+00:00): Boopington,

"tags" is not a good changeset comment.  Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments about making good changeset comments. These help other mappers discover your intent with an edit.

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5081

Thanks,
Elliott
OSM Data Working Group
snoozingnewt (2021-12-09 00:57:18+00:00): These buildings are not accurate shapes - can you please try to make them more accurate and fix these ones? Thanks!
Tantri IRM-ED (2022-12-15 04:35:18+00:00): Hi etu
Your edit looks awesome, but is this highway right for access to the middle of the river?(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1010377174)
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142906385)
Thank you
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:50:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274210
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:30:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317108
Warin61 (2021-12-15 23:55:58+00:00): Hi,

The 'name' of the beach looks to be a creek name. What is the source of the beach name? 

A reminder of my past comment .. the beach could have a surface of rock or mud. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach ... I suggest using the tag surface=sand.
user_4493657 (2021-12-09 01:44:28+00:00): *Rzepin
PT-53 (2022-09-04 05:44:02+00:00): Hallo donovaly,
Du hast an diesem Gleisabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938601430/history
das Merkmal
- railway=construction
abgeändert auf
- railway=tram.
Müßte dann nicht das Merkmal
- constrution=tram
gelöscht werden ?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße

PS:
Gefunden im OSM-Inspector:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=7.85284&lat=48.01227&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes%2Cnonop_confusion_on_ways
donovaly (2022-09-12 20:57:27+00:00): Danke dir. Ist nun gefixt.
ZLima12 (2021-12-09 02:14:11+00:00): Also note that due to the extended length that this bridge will be closed, it might make sense to shift the trunk designation to US-9W.
Warin61 (2021-12-10 05:01:44+00:00): Hi,
Relation 8764842 - fairway - now has no outer ... but 2 inners.
Frans S (2021-12-23 15:33:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114723687
Saeed SJ (2021-12-15 10:26:32+00:00): سلام
علت این تغییر چه بوده؟
TeaHorseRoad (2021-12-15 23:51:11+00:00): سلام سعید اس جی. از اینکه به تماس شدید متشکرم. بزرگراه فرعی را برای اتصال خیابان به میدان وصل کردم. من می بینم که شما بزرگراه را قطع کرده اید، و پس از بررسی آن تغییر، اکنون می بینم که چگونه آن اتصال وجود ندارد. برای به روز کردن هندسی در اینجا متشکریم.

(node)من می بینم که یک مانع فیزیکی وجود دارد که مانع از این ارتباط می شود. آیا فکر می‌کنید اضافه کردن یک گره barrier=block در غرب https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6581388067 می‌تواند جلوگیری از ایجاد این ارتباط مشابه که توسط نقشه‌برداران دیگر در آینده صورت میگیرد کمک کند؟ اگر چنین است، می توانم آن را فقط در غرب لینک ثانویه شریعتی اضافه کنم. روز خوبی داشته باشید و باز هم متشکرم!

Hello Saeed SJ. Thank you for reaching out about this. I connected the secondary highway to the roundabout for road connectivity. I see you’ve disconnected the highway, and after reviewing that change I now see how that connection doesn’t exist. Thanks for updating the geometry here.

I see that there is a physical barrier preventing this connection. Do you think that adding a barrier=block node just west of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6581388067 would help prevent other mappers making this same connection in the future? If so, I can add that just west of the secondary_link شریعتی. Have a good day and thanks again!
Hans Thompson (2021-12-09 17:38:59+00:00): nice edit!
archpdx (2021-12-09 06:28:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for updating the businesses in this area - it's nice to see some more mappers in Oregon. Note that suite numbers, such as 'C' for 'Dream Dinners' should be placed in the 'unit' field instead of the housenumber.
archpdx (2021-12-09 06:29:27+00:00): If you have any questions feel free to respond to my comment
someart13 (2021-12-09 06:14:15+00:00): and Mapillary
JeroenHoek (2021-12-09 08:39:02+00:00): Is it really necessary to keep making these huge globe-spanning changesets? Could you try to keep your changesets a little smaller?
SekeRob (2021-12-09 16:57:07+00:00): @ iWowik: If you map across German borders it would be nice if you did you CS commentary in English, Verstehen Sie? Like this guy who maps in Italia only and does some of his comments in German, but never in Italian. Is close to an insult. Your consideration is much appreciated.

ciao
maro21 (2021-12-11 13:50:32+00:00): What are these Polish names of the streets in Belarus come from?
SekeRob (2021-12-11 16:12:56+00:00): Talking about names the name:be=вуліца 40 год Перамогі does niet read as either flemish, french or dutch. This CS becomes more questionable as time passes and more eyes look at it.
SekeRob (2021-12-11 16:16:59+00:00): Maybe be is belarus and name:b (B} shows on Belgian cars) is belgium. Name:b does not exist in tag info, so hear my apology for misdirection.
JeroenHoek (2021-12-11 17:39:11+00:00): See ISO 639-2:

https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php

The Flemish predominantly speak and write Dutch, which has language code 'nl' (the Walloons usually speak and write French: 'fr').

If specifically Belgian/Flemish Dutch is meant, the country code specifier can be appended: nl_BE. 'BE' means Belgium in ISO 3166 (Alpha-2), but does not refer to any language. Dutch as spoken in the Netherlands is nl_NL. In OSM we don't do this for names though (it simply isn't needed).

'be' on the other hand (note the lowercase letters) simply means Belarusian.

The country codes on number plates have nothing to do with either standard.
wkdgs (2021-12-09 09:59:10+00:00): Die Straßenstücke hinter diesen beiden haben noch maxspeed=60. Ist dort auch wieder 100 erlaubt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114728613
aixbrick (2021-12-09 12:21:42+00:00): Hello,
you ignored the "note" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871851358 and merged both areas. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2962730 for more info why there is a separation. Moreover there is no need to change hw=path to hw=cycleway. Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114741877.
Regards
Martin Borsje (2021-12-09 16:18:34+00:00): I did not merge the areas, I juxtaposed these, which is correct, there is no horizontal space between. The waal should block routing, which it generally does.

The path, asphalt is clearly meant as a cycleway with shared use. Don't remember the exact signage anymore. 'promoting' this to a cycleway makes it for routers better to prefer this route to cycles.
For what it is worth: signage of highway parallel/adjacent path/ways as eithe footway or shared cycleway is often ignored in Germany and then fro me duck tagging applies. Please reconsider (partially) your revert.
aixbrick (2021-12-09 17:02:47+00:00): The problem is the outer way of the areas which is used for routing. If both areas are "glued" together, a router could route you from the right bridge to the end of the stairs (left) by using the outer line. Maybe that could be avoided by using layer=0/1, but does this have an impact on the outer line used by both areas?

>> Don't remember the exact signage anymore.
But that is the main feature how it should be tagged. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren. A hw=cycleway is a way only for bicycles marked with sign 237. foot=yes would mean "Fußgänger frei", but that sign does not exist in Germany. And using a way marked with sign 237 by foot forbides the law.