piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Grass-snake (2023-02-14 10:24:44+00:00): Добрый день, Вы уверены что данный пешеходный переход существует?

Если ответа не будет, переделаю через пешеходный переход на северо-западе.
sunphoto (2023-02-14 13:43:32+00:00): Абсолютно, езжу там каждый день, только он не косой, а обычный прямой с пешеходным светофором.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-16 16:55:42+00:00): can you take look at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5295640 ?
biobuur (2024-12-14 13:07:07+00:00): Hallo fratzzz
du hast vor längerem beim AED im Freibad Hellbach, Grindelwald die tags access:permissive sowie defibrillator:location gelöscht. Ist das richtig, oder war es ein Versehen?
mfg
biobuur
rskedgell (2023-05-07 06:52:46+00:00): Hi currybum,

Thanks for editing the map with StreetComplete.

You have marked parts of Alton Road (A31) and Runwick Lane as being prohibited for pedestrians. I cannot find any signage indicating that a prohibition exists in the available streetside imagery. Is this a newly signed restriction, or is there some other reason to believe that a prohibition exists?

Please ensure that if you are marking a road as prohibited for pedestrians, that there is actually a restriction on pedestrians. The vast majority of roads in the UK do not prohibit pedestrians, although they may be unsuitable for pedestrians. Many sections of roads, particularly on dual carriageways and parts of complex junctions may be unsuitable for pedestrians, but that does not extinguish the legal right to use them.

Where pedestrians are prohibited, there will usually be a "pedestrians prohibited" sign (TSRGD diagram 625.1) on a public highway, or the equivalent health and safety sign on private land.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/3/made#tgp1-tbl1-tbd1-tr22
https://www.hse.gov.uk/workplacetransport/safetysigns/prohibitorypedestrians.htm

The StreetComplete AddProhibitedForPedestrians Quest ("Add whether roads are prohibited for pedestrians") adds a foot=no or foot=yes access tag to the road, based on the user's answer. The OSM wiki's description of access tagging states that "Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground truth; e.g., signage or legal ruling and not introduce guesswork. It does not describe common or typical use, even if signage is generally ignored."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
currybum (2023-05-10 09:38:08+00:00): Ah my apologies; given what I learned just now about the prohibited sign then my change was made in error. There is no such sign.

Thanks for pointing that out; this changeset can be reverted and the prohibited tags removed. Would you like to revert it (I'm not sure how!) - or should I create a new changeset to remove those tags?

Thank you!
rskedgell (2023-05-10 11:14:31+00:00): Many thanks for confirming this.

Obviously you wouldn't want to walk along there unless you had to, but pedestrian routers should apply a high cost to dual carriageway trunk road and no sidewalk.

If you're happy to change it, a fresh changeset is quicker and easier than using the reverter plugin in JOSM.
currybum (2023-05-10 20:30:25+00:00): Reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135951507
eggie (2022-07-24 18:54:31+00:00): Dag  Bosuil.... Denk je er aan dat de taak in OSM UK English is..  colour=
eggie (2022-07-24 19:56:31+00:00): Typo taak》taal
Bosuil112 (2022-07-24 20:30:28+00:00): Hallo,
Ik zal proberen alles in het Engels te omschrijven .
eggie (2022-07-24 20:40:47+00:00): Prima... Hier heb ik het gelijk maar aangepast. :)
Je omschrijving van je edits bij upload  mag overigens gewoon in het Nederlands..  De tagging zelf is altijd UK Engels.. anders kunnen de afgeleide apps er niet mee overweg.
Bosuil112 (2022-07-24 20:49:53+00:00): Ik heb de bank geplaatst met de app Go Map!! Alleen moet er soms tekst handmatig ingevuld worden om het compleet te maken.
yasslay (2022-12-17 20:29:59+00:00): Hello!

I left this as a note earlier, but I've decided to leave a comment here instead.

Is the name 'Golden Valley Bypass' really the name of the A40 here? OS data suggests that this isn't the case and that the name isn't really what it has been tagged as in the changeset.

I know that there's a suburb (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5628763205#map=14/51.8971/-2.1360) named Golden Valley which the A40 does bypass, but it seems unlikely that this is case where the name has been applied elsewhere in the changeset.

Kind regards,
yasslay
SomeoneElse (2022-12-20 11:46:35+00:00): I'm somewhat familiar with the area as I have friends who lived there, and have driven the stretch of road from the M5 into Cheltenham lots of times.

The name "Golden Valley" is used to refer to the general area and (sometimes) by association to the road from Cheltenham to the M5.  It's no more than a loc_name though, if that.  
The name is absolutely not "Golden Valley Bypass", and that is even more wrong for the Gloucester / M5 link.
I suspect that the motorway junction is not called "Golden Valley Junction".  Perhaps Falsernet can provide some photographs backing up this name?  If not, then it should be removed.

For the information of all, this isn't the first time Falsernet has used dubious names:

http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13341565

includes notes about some names that are literally just made up.  Obviously those edits were a while back (as was this edit) so hopefully that isn't happening any more.
Best Regards,
Andy
Falsernet (2022-12-21 00:19:27+00:00): If you search "Golden Valley Bypass" you can find lots of articles and other sites referencing the "A40 Golden Valley Bypass," and with there being a B4063 Gloucester/Cheltenham Road via Golden Valley, it makes sense you'd call it that. OS may not recognise the name but it certainly is used.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-21 11:41:20+00:00): > "A40 Golden Valley Bypass,"

Yes - that's a description.  It doesn't mean that it's an actual name.  It certainly doesn't explain your use of the name as far as Gloucester.

> OS may not recognise the name but it certainly is used.

As I said above, "Golden Valley" is a suburb and the name is also used locally to refer to the bit of the A40 between Cheltenham and the M5 (hence me suggesting "loc_name" above).  I've never heard ""Golden Valley bypass" used other than as a description and I've never heard ""Golden Valley Junction" used at all.
loveshack (2023-01-03 13:17:55+00:00): I lived in Cheltenham when that road was built (bypassing Churchdown via the old Gloucester Road) and I currently drive it regularly.  From Benhall to Longlevens it's always been known locally as the Golden Valley Bypass (or just Golden Valley in context) like in traffic reports and road works, and surely should be tagged as with loc_name.  The first search result I see is https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/a40-golden-valley-bypass-traffic-7652872

I'm pretty sure there's no sign naming the M5 junction.  I'd call it "Golden Valley junction" when giving instructions, but that's obvious and I'm not sure it should be explicitly tagged.  Recent maintenance work on it uses Golden Valley interchange or gyratory, e.g. https://freyssinet.co.uk/bridge-strengthening-golden-valley-bridge-refurbishment/ and https://nationalhighways.co.uk/our-roads/south-west-news/m5-junction-11-reopens-on-schedule-after-18-month-upgrade-work/ (OGL).
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-07-25 05:21:55+00:00): You list "Open Records for Kansas Appraisers" a lot of state data is unclear what copyright it is under and if it can be included in the map based on what i have checked out. What data specifically are you using and what copyright is it under?
chrispalmeri (2022-07-25 23:01:58+00:00): I used https://www.kansasgis.org/orka/intro.cfm?countyName=Pottawatomie (only to visually confirm some parcel boundaries). No copyright is listed. I believe it to be public domain data prepared by county employees.
literan (2022-07-25 17:34:25+00:00): зачем адрес на бревне? :)) исправлю
maraf24 (2022-07-25 12:21:03+00:00): Hi
Zmieniłeś tu budynek w teren, a należało tylko zmienić rodzaj budynku na garages.
Hanspeter Schmidt (2022-07-26 15:31:57+00:00): Przepraszam. Z pewnością się pomyliłem. Dziękuje za poprawę.
4004 (2022-07-24 20:41:03+00:00): здравствуйте.
проверить точность сложно, но вообще есть еще снимки максар - они обычно новее. доступны в правом меню.
ну и все снимки немного смещены, так что их надо проверять на смещение относительно уже отрисованого или треков
haukep (2022-07-25 10:00:17+00:00): Sicherheitshalber gefragt: sport=[...],diving wurde mit dieser Änderung entfernt. Gibt's hier also kein Tauchangebot mehr?
fx11 (2022-07-25 19:53:01+00:00): sport=diving war am Sprungturmbecken vorhanden.
Am ehesten würde ich das mit sport=cliff_diving ersetzen wollen, aber so richtig passt das nicht.

Wenn du wirklich Tauchen meinst würde ich zu sport=scuba_diving tendieren. 
Bzgl. Tauchkursen mache ich mich mal schlau. Im Internet ist nichts zu finden.

sport=diving ist mehrdeutig und veraltet, den möchte ich nicht mehr nehmen.
haukep (2022-07-26 19:09:15+00:00): Ich hatte nur gesehen, dass der Tag rausgeflogen war - aber nicht weiter recherchiert, sondern wollte nur nachhaken. Alleine weil das Taggingschema sport=diving veraltet ist, passt das aus meiner Sicht schon, wenn er draußen bleibt. :)

Irgendwo gab es mal eine Datenbank, die dabei unterstützen solle, "tauchrelevante Orte" in OSM zu erfassen. Ich finde sie jedoch nicht wieder. Wenn die Tauchfans sie wiederfinden sollten, können sie ggf. ja wieder entsprechende Ergänzungen vornehmen.
ToniE (2022-07-25 15:05:04+00:00): Hi,

siehe auch Kommentar zu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124003100

VG
Toni
J-MUC (2022-07-25 17:23:23+00:00): Hallo Toni,

der Weg ist ca. 2,45 m breit, davon ab gehen dann Regenfallrohre und (mobile) Blumenkübel vor dem Eingang zum ASZ. Richtung Westen endet der Weg Höhen- und Pflaster-gleich auf dem Gehweg. Der Gehweg ist durch einen regulär hohen Randstein von der Straßenfläche getrennt, zudem befinden sich am Straßenrand noch nicht kartierte Lasten- und normale Fahrradständer. D.h. für mich ist dieses Teilstück ziemlich klar ein Fußweg.

Bzgl. des anderen CS kommentiere ich dort.

Viele Grüße

J-MUC
eggie (2022-07-24 20:11:43+00:00): Beste Arjan.. Svp geen wegen van de kaart verwijderen die er in werkelijkheid zijn.
Wanneer iets een eigen weg is dan is deze gewoon toegankelijk en je kunt dan access=permissive toevoegen.
Wanneer het verboden toegang is middels een bord dan is de tag access=private.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-24 20:17:38+00:00): reverted by changeset #124023295

Je edits zijn teruggezet. Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Akle bestaande paden kunnen van belang zijn bv bij brandbestrijding.
De brandweer rijdt ook op OSM
MVG
eggie
ArjanJager (2022-07-25 18:24:52+00:00): Heel erg bedankt! 
Wat betreft die tags van eigen weg en verboden toegang: goed om te weten. Ik had nog niet hiernaar gezocht, wat ik het best kan gebruiken, beter wel kunnen doen.
Janjko (2022-09-16 11:41:14+00:00): Do you have any additional information about this caravan site? A name, or a website?
Schäuble Michele (2022-09-16 11:49:43+00:00): Your can find more information about this place on https://park4night.com/en/lieu/367263/on-the-farm/poljanak/croatia/op%C4%87ina-plitvi%C4%8Dka-jezera#.YyRiV-zP1yo but there is no official website. I'm not aware of the official name of this site.
Janjko (2022-09-16 13:27:00+00:00): Thanks! That's a lot of help.
mapperue (2023-07-11 09:54:01+00:00): Ahoj, keď upravuješ povrch ciest, tak nepridávaj k značkám tracktype=grade1 a surface=asphalt značku smoothness=very_bad ako u tejto cesty:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72319087
Buď to je asfaltová cesta alebo je jej zjazdnosť veľmi zlá a asfaltový povrch nemá. Keď je asfalt veľmi poškodený, tak je povrch gravel.
moonraver (2023-07-11 12:43:13+00:00): cavec, pravdu mas, som sa tam sekol,je jasne, ze asphalt nema smoothness hodnotu very_bad. Ak si dobre pamatam, tak som cestu prerabal z gravelu na asphalt a smoothness som zrejme neopravil. Pevne povrchy maju ine posudzovanie ako nespevnene.Opravil som aj cesty na krizovatke mosta,ktore navazovali na nu.Si niekde z blizka Tr.Teplej?
eggie (2022-07-24 20:58:52+00:00): Beste Arjan.. Svp geen wegen meer van de kaart verwijderen. Het was hier goed getagd met accesstags die de routering stoppen.
Ik draai je edit terug. 

Een hek kun je toevoegen op een node met barrier=gate en access=private
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-24 20:59:57+00:00): reverted by changeset #124024432
ArjanJager (2022-07-25 18:25:42+00:00): Opnieuw: bedankt voor de feedback.
eggie (2022-07-25 18:30:45+00:00): No problem...
Zelf ben ik behoudend in het intekenen van prive oprijlanen.. maar als ze al ingetekend zijn laat ik ze staan..
Mapse verder..
Eggie
ivanbranco (2022-07-26 13:32:26+00:00): Hi Hartz Beltza,

is the Mozambique Channel an on-going project? Because as it is now it's an incomplete relation.
Hartz Beltza (2022-07-26 20:26:00+00:00): Hi ivanbranco, Yes it's incomplete relation and I do need some help. It needs a bunch of hours to be finished.
Eiim (2022-07-24 23:32:54+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits to Oxford!

When drawing buildings, use the "q" shortcut to square the corners. I've gone ahead and fixed the buildings from this changeset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124027032).
vanxssa (2022-07-24 23:41:40+00:00): Thank you! Much appreciated, thanks for the tip!
redd (2022-08-05 10:49:13+00:00): Hi surt,
thanks for your long history of contribution to OpenStreetMap! 
I hope its okay for you, that I react in english language.
May I have question about this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081007977
Are you really sure this is a bridge? For me it seemed more like a normal way, but the water had a tunnel underneath?
Thanks!
Redd
mueschel (2022-07-28 18:45:47+00:00): Hi,
what does 'disabled:lanes' mean? According to common tagging rules these are access rules for vehicles of disabled people on specific lanes, which doesn't seem right.
Axelos (2022-07-28 20:08:45+00:00): Bonjour,

bonne remarque, la clef que je souhaitais utiliser était « disused » (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:disused%3Dyes). Je corrige.

Axel.
Dave Venables (2022-07-25 06:35:54+00:00): Please use addr:city and addr:village tags rather than just city and village ones
MxxCon (2022-07-25 03:19:18+00:00): Hello.
This edit has major problems.
Every single swimming pool that you wanted to add is missing leisure=swimming_pool tag. The way it stands right now you just drew a bunch of lines and added access=private to them without actually tagging them as swimming pools.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124024784
GeorgeKaplan (2023-03-05 07:47:34+00:00): Bonjour, Sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9908306967 , on trouve : 
operator=Ville de Metz
alors qu'on se trouve à Besançon ?!
arte2002 (2022-07-30 19:03:29+00:00): Hola adrianbenedited

Revierto algunos datos desactualizados del catastro

También tendrías que mirar las imágenes de PNOA de España, los datos del Catastro parece que están desactualizados
Kirstukas (2022-08-02 20:11:04+00:00): imagery_used:
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66556/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66549/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66552/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66553/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66554/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66555/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66550/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/66557/{z}/{x}/{y}.png)
arte2002 (2022-07-30 19:54:12+00:00): Hola adrianbenedited

Revierto algunos datos desactualizados del catastro

Tendrías que ser más cuidadoso con tus ediciones, eliminantes escaleras y algún datos.

También tendrías que mirar las imágenes de PNOA de España, los datos del Catastro parece que están desactualizados
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-13 00:00:32+00:00): en no_u_turn restriction skal have to veje som medlemmer og de skal have rollerne "from" og "to".
ottwiz (2022-07-24 22:48:17+00:00): A borostyánkő utat beigazítottam FÖMI-hez, ezt elfelejtettem írni
Langlaeufer (2022-07-25 19:52:58+00:00): Hi Saruman 808,
deine Ergänzungen der Access-Tags sind nicht stimmig. Die Access-Tags haben eine Hierachie. Die speziellen Tags überschreiben die allgemeinen.
Vorsicht mit access, dass gibt einen Weg für wirklich alle Fortbewegungsarten frei (z.B. auch einen Fußweg für Autos, oder eine Autobahn für Fußgänger).
Der Weg mit access=aggricultural und bicycle/foot/horse/motorcar/motorcycle=no ist auch ziemlich sinnlos, denn auf welche Art soll dann noch landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr erfolgen wenn alle sinnvollen Unterarten verboten sind.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124026522
Langlaeufer (2022-07-25 19:56:45+00:00): Vorsicht mit access=yes - das gibt die Nutzung für wirklich alles frei.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124026522
user_5359 (2023-03-27 12:53:04+00:00): Hallo! Schau Dir bitte nochmal https://www.osm.org/way/495625772 an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tag yes = designated?
bielebog (2023-03-29 06:13:07+00:00): Ist natürlich Quatsch. Wohl ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Habe ich korrigiert.
marc__marc (2022-10-20 09:51:18+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081024699
2 soucis : solar n'est pas un méthode, c'est la source de l'énergie.
mais qu'est-ce donc ? vous avez renseigné des capteurs thermiques qui produisent de l'électricité. cela existe (avec des milliers de mirroir pour faire bouillir de l'eau) mais c'est vraiement pas courant.
plus courament on a des capteurs thermiques qui produisent de la chaleur ou des capteurs photovoltagique qui produisent de l'électricité
Cordialement,
Marc
tastrax (2022-07-29 01:25:14+00:00): Hi folks, the underpass looks to be a bit further north than your location plus there are conflicting tags on bits of the underpass. Can bikes use the underpass? if so make the entire length a path with the required user tags rather than a footway.
Yunkers (2022-07-25 19:25:26+00:00): Nie wszystko ci się wycofało i są dziury primary :)
kubahahaha (2022-07-25 20:48:30+00:00): Dzięki!
Nie wiem czy to reverter zawiódł, czy nie skopiowałem wszystkich id. W każdym razie poprawione w
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124068651
oba510 (2022-07-25 10:47:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.  I'm the person who originally mapped the sidewalks on Shattuck and Adeline.

Please don't do this.  

The access tags generally apply to the entire street, not just the vehicle lanes in the roadway.  The vast majority of sidewalks in Berkeley have been mapped as an attribute of the way (using the sidewalk=both/left/right/no tag).  When you tag a street with foot=no it means that pedestrians are completely banned from the street, including walking down the sidewalk, or along the edge of the road, or to a parked car.  I don't think that's what you meant to do here.

The access tags are mainly about the legal access more so than whether it's a good idea or comfortable.  I looked it up and the actual legal situation is...complicated, but it's not actually illegal to walk along the roadway on most ordinary city streets in Berkeley (including north and south Shattuck).

The foot=yes tags along the portions of Shattuck and Adeline where the sidewalks are mapped as separate ways were left over from before the sidewalks were mapped separately, and should probably be removed (but not necessarily changed foot=no).  Those ways are tagged with sidewalk=separate which should tell routing software not to use them for pedestrian routing.
mavl (2022-08-18 14:39:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
nyampire (2023-05-14 08:21:56+00:00): こんにちは。OSM編集ありがとうございます。

sumiokaさんの過去の編集で、Plateauデータのインポートを実施されていることを発見しました。
たいへん申し訳ないのですが、インポートには専用のアカウント作成を行う、インポート作業を行うアカウントを一覧化する、などのガイドラインが定められています。

時間の経ってしまった内容で申し訳ないのですが、対象の編集を3つ、巻き戻しさせてください。
もしPlateauインポートに参加されたい場合、ぜひお声がけください。建物の高さ情報なども入りますので、sumiokaさんの活動にもお役に立てると思っています。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124027971
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-25 03:00:41+00:00): Please use descriptive comments so other mappers know what was done.
maraf24 (2022-07-25 11:18:08+00:00): Ten tekst: "Ujęcie wody przy ul. Ciszewskiego własność Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego"
powinien być w tagu description, bo to jest opis, a nie nazwa.
salvager (2022-07-29 14:30:39+00:00): wrzuciłem zmianę nazwy na "Ujęcie wody przy Basenie SGGW" stara poszła w opis (w nazwę jako najbardziej rozpnawalny obiekt wokół) dla lepszej identyfikacji
literan (2022-07-25 17:24:04+00:00): добрый день!

в отношение автобуса еще хорошо бы добавить последовательность линий дорог, по которым он проезжает
whb (2022-08-08 14:46:52+00:00): Guten Tag,

diese Änderung ist zweifelhaft.
Wahrscheinlich befindet sich dort kein Tor, sondern wie bisher ein Schlagbaum.
Bitte die Quelle für diese Änderung angeben!
deekpurb (2022-11-02 08:00:11+00:00): Hi,

Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for looking into the change set. We have added access:delivery=no tag based on the driver feedback.We have started adding this tag based on OSM community suggestion. If you are local or going to survey this location please make the appropriate changes or let us know, we would be happy to update the map. For further information, kindly go through this diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jguthula/diary/392437.

Thanks and Regards,
deekpurb
maraf24 (2022-07-25 11:13:41+00:00): Cześć.
Drogę tu skasowałeś (highway=residential), chyba nie o to chodziło?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393887977/history
salvager (2022-07-29 14:19:05+00:00): dzięki, chyba musiał jakiś rykoszet pójść
Herman Lee (2022-07-27 15:47:29+00:00): 不要将临时封路放在osm上，谢谢
Frans S (2022-10-26 10:23:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag a trace, width about 4 mtr as a path.  Unclassified is a better tag here. (wide enough for transport by car)
fyi  The wiki about tagging highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Best regards
Vinícius Vini (2023-03-26 19:52:32+00:00): Parque Curupira - Prefeito Luiz Roberto Jábali
user_19382120 (2024-02-15 15:27:42+00:00): You have mapped lanes as link roads. See Secondary links, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary_link and Turn lanes, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Identifying_a_turn_indication .
MxxCon (2022-07-25 03:30:29+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you drew that bike path as separate way? From what I can see on the satellite imagery, there's no physical separation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124028948
snake21 (2022-07-26 01:21:15+00:00): If physical separation is required to map it separately, then perhaps this wasn't the right move. From a visual perspective, it's a 2-way path protected from a one-way street by a row of parked cars
snake21 (2022-07-26 01:32:40+00:00): @MxxCon it seems like we're in the T3 situation described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_tracks

To me, the separate way method is visually more accurate and captures more detail. However, I understand this is is not a "set policy"...
MxxCon (2022-07-26 03:03:21+00:00): I don't remember where I read it, but a parking lane is not considered a physical separation..Can't seem to find that article now.

Visually more accurate using what mapping style? What kind of details would be missing by tagging the associated street way?
whb (2022-08-08 14:49:50+00:00): Guten Tag,

diese Änderung ist zweifelhaft.
Wahrscheinlich befindet sich dort kein Tor, sondern ein Poller, eine Schranke oder eine andere Absperrung.
Dürfen Fußgänger und Radfahrer wirklich nicht durch?
Bitte die Quelle für diese Änderung angeben!