piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2021-07-10 08:13:26+00:00): Hi, I've removed Way: 962946913 (unclassified highway) that you placed on top of an existing footpath. There does not seem to be an unclassified highway on this line.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-07-09 16:58:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tagging of the features here to more meet OSM practice. the name= tag is for formal verifiable names, not descriptions.

Regards Bernard.
Vinber-Pro (2021-07-20 16:32:51+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Et si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas :)
GinaroZ (2021-09-28 22:01:41+00:00): Is there really a building here?
jmapb (2021-08-29 13:35:23+00:00): Howdy... can you elaborate on the data source for this change, and the meaning of these hashtags?

Thanks, J
jmapb (2021-09-01 18:24:38+00:00): Ok, clicking through, to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook from your user profile, I can see the description of the "Atlas Checks" project, and drilling down into the Atlas Checks github I can see there's a little blurb about the "Connvectivty Check" feature at https://github.com/osmlab/atlas-checks/blob/dev/docs/checks/connectivityCheck.md

None of this gives me any clue why you'd want to attach node 765365658 to the Harlem River Drive. I have to assume that your Atlas Checks instance flagged this spot for review, and you decided that this connection between the track the motorway was correct. Supposedly based on Bing imagery? If you can elaborate, I'd love to hear it.

I've left this alone hoping you'd find time to review this change and perhaps improve the quality of your QA initiatives. But I believe it needs reverting, so if you want to examine it in situ hurry up.

Thanks, J
VLD178 (2021-09-01 20:58:01+00:00): Hello jmapb, These changeset comments come from map roulette projects where features causing warnings or errors are queried for a potential fix. At second look I do see the shortcoming on this update and will revert the changeset to its prior state. Thanks for reaching out to me to make this right and I welcome any further collaboration on improving OSM. As for the hash tags, please refer to this link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook#Atlas_Checks for more information.
jmapb (2021-09-02 19:34:45+00:00): Thanks, as I mentioned above I did browse through the Atlas Checks github page but short of building my own Atlas Checks instance populated with the map in its previous state, there's no way to be certain where this process went wrong.

My best guess is that the actual issue flagged by the ConnectivityCheck was non-connectivity between ways 60251535 and 60251535, which both ended at nodes overlapping at the same location, one of which was 765365658. A connection was needed, but not the Harlem River Drive motorway. I've fixed this now (joined 60251535 and 60251535 into a single highway.)
masse_VermKV (2022-12-20 09:05:59+00:00): Hi, can you tell me where you got this information that there is a road construction. Because it seem´s like there is nothing.
LateNightTone (2022-12-20 16:20:43+00:00): Hi, I didn't create this from scratch - I refined some of the existing mapping based on an approximation of construction plans, as there were sections which did not make sense (see history of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350073909/history for some additional history of the original mapping). I didn't make any changes to the status (i.e. under construction, proposed, etc.), as it was already mapped this way. If you have local knowledge of this and it's clear the construction has not begun, it may be best to re-tag all mapped sections as highway=proposed instead (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed)
BCNorwich (2021-07-10 08:07:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed a duplicated highway. Please don't place a highway on top of an existing highway it's duplication that messes with routing.

If a highway (or any feature) needs correcting/amending please correct/amend the existing feature thus the way history will be maintained. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Atanas Angelov (2021-07-10 08:49:39+00:00): Thank you for let me know, I did find option to change only part of the line.
For the future will try to find the correct way.
LADG1 (2021-08-11 18:37:43+00:00): Hola, he visto una de tus ediciones (conjunto de cambios: 107714672). Por favor, en próximas ediciones ten cuidado con los límites administrativos a la hora de editar. Lo comento porque en un tramo del límite del municipio de Morata de Jalón con Chodes, y finalizado en La Almunia has indicado que se trataba de del Río Jalón y no es así. Ya he corregido el error con datos del IGN.
Saludos.
Valkiry13 (2021-08-11 19:45:52+00:00): Hola, gracias por comentarmelo, perdón por el fallo, pensé que eran dos corrientes en diferente dirección, la próxima vez iré con más cuidado.
LADG1 (2021-08-15 00:09:18+00:00): No pasa nada. Y gracias por contribuir a mapear la zona.
Morten Lange (2021-07-09 15:59:10+00:00): Átti við austur af almenna veginum.
surveyor54 (2021-10-05 19:28:52+00:00): Hallo,

uns liegt keine Erlaubnis zur Übernahme von Informationen aus dem GeoportalRLP vor. Bitte übernehme keine Informationen von dort! 
Dieser Änderungssatz sollte rückgängig gemacht werden.

Viele Grüße
surveyor54
uwe-shwbl (2021-10-05 20:24:09+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis auf diesen Änderungssatz. 
Mittlerweile hatte ich das bereits mitbekommen, dass die Daten des RLP-Geoportals nicht verwendet werden können. Wohl wegen inkompatibler Lizenz.
surveyor54 (2021-10-06 12:25:09+00:00): Danke für dein Verständnis. !!!
*abq* (2022-06-26 07:01:53+00:00): Hallo Mrsuspect,
bitte verwende den name-tag nur für Eigennamen, nicht für "Brunnen" oder ähnliches. Die sind entweder sowieso schon über das Tagging abgedeckt oder gehören in description
VG Reiner
mariotomo (2021-09-01 16:10:32+00:00): hola, gracias por mejorar el mapa. voy a ampliar la 'landuse=residential' para incluir la expansión residencial.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107717222
ma-rt-in (2021-07-10 12:55:54+00:00): Hallo,
das Gebäude steht doch noch, warum also einen Lifecycle prefix verwenden?

vg
OutOfBrain2 (2021-07-10 14:09:21+00:00): Hallo, danke, dass du das nochmal nachgeschaut hast. Ich hatte das von

> Using abandoned=yes as a simple tag is now discouraged in many cases

und

> The abandoned: lifecycle prefix can be added to tags that relate to features that have fallen into serious disrepair and which could only be put back into operation with expensive effort. Such features will still have some physical form reflective of their former use visible in the landscape

so verstanden, aber wenn ich das jetzt nochmal anschaue muss
`abandoned:building=industrial` weg und
`abandoned=yes` bleibt?
ma-rt-in (2021-07-15 08:57:25+00:00): Hallo,
eigentlich ist beides hier falsch. Den Das Gebäude, welches als Industriegebäude erbaut wurde, steht ja noch, auch wenn es nicht mehr genutzt wird.

Wenn da nun noch eine Firma gemappt wäre, könnte man abandoned als lifecylce prefix für die Firma verwenden, um diese noch datentechnische aufzubewahren.

vg
Kodoku_s4n (2021-07-10 10:10:59+00:00): У "Аптеки-музею Йогана Зега" неправильна позиція. Він знаходиться в центрі парку, а ця будівля, що позначена як "Аптека-музей" насправді є вхідною аркою в парк
Myazyk (2021-07-11 20:20:51+00:00): Дякую, я поняття не мав де воно, але хотів щоб він був на карті.
Якщо Ти бориславський (бачу, там редагуєш), то переміти точку сам у потрібне місце
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Tomas Straupis (2021-07-10 07:19:34+00:00): Čia kažkas negerai, krūmai panainti, ir dalis salos pažymėta place=island. Tikriausiai salos žymos buvo planuotos VISAI salai?
SekeRob (2021-07-11 14:55:50+00:00): Sometimes by keyboard stutters (and three ties is because the original single path was cut in 3 to handle the up /down - flat section tags ;o)

PS, why a comma separator instead of semicolon with 2 colours you'd ask: Because in ID editor at the time a semicolon would erase the first colour after selecting the second. Fortunately no longer, but I've stopped 2 colours. Asked 8 months ago how and never got an answer.
Anyway thanks for fixing the black;white and red;white. I'm pretty sure I did a few green,white zebra crossings as well.

cheers
francians (2021-07-09 21:13:48+00:00): Buonasera,

Grazie per il contributo!

Segnalo che al numero di telefono andrebbe ancora aggiunto il prefisso internazionale +39.

Saluti
Francesco
PT-53 (2022-01-29 07:51:42+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
diese Linie (ehemaliges Fahrsilo?)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962985895/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
OF-1 (2022-01-29 14:15:46+00:00): Hallo Peter,
Fehler ist behoben ...
Grüße
Viki_travel_weak (2021-07-13 04:17:58+00:00): Other legal sources for editing used in the josm based sources: 'Strava cycling and running heatmap', 'TIGER Roads 2020', 'U.S. Forest Roads Overlay', 'osm imagery based'.
joost schouppe (2021-07-09 18:51:26+00:00): Hey Joel,
I noticed that a previous mapper said these toilets weren't usable anymore. I suppose that's wrong then?
joeldn (2021-07-11 12:49:03+00:00): Hi,

It had been listed as reopened: https://www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk/info/200329/coronavirus/2211/buildings_and_service_closures/3 but will have a look.

Cheers.
jleedev (2021-07-09 18:06:13+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jleedev (2021-07-09 18:06:59+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Jakka (2021-07-10 21:41:39+00:00): Hier zitten een paar Onverenigbaarheden in ofwel bos ofwel weide ...
wordt dit als dusdanig gebruikt "industriële doeleinden" of in afwachting van eventueel braakliggend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:landuse
Pink Duck (2021-09-03 14:47:40+00:00): Aren't addresses as used by Royal Mail assigned to deliverable building units though? So shouldn't that information be on the building itself, perhaps postal_code on the outline if necessary?
Robert Whittaker (2021-09-05 16:54:28+00:00): Whatever Royal Mail thinks it's doing, the address is clearly a property of the school as a whole, so I think in OSM it should be included in the tags for the school object.

Simple test: for schools with multiple buildings (including those with individual names) you don't typically get an individual Royal Mail address for each one. So even if Royal Mail defines a particular building (or a point on that building) as the delivery point for the school, the address is still  for the whole school.

I don't any any data for the addition of address tags to school buildings, but on amenity=school objects in GB, 82% have an addr:postcode=* and 61% have addr:street=* from https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/osm-tag-keys.html .
Pink Duck (2021-09-05 18:57:33+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address
It's still rather building-centric in the definition there though. Largely since the posties needs to find the building where the mail is received, while people navigating mainly rely on postcode for locating the street.
Pink Duck (2021-09-06 11:45:31+00:00): From taginfo:
building + addr:postcode = 47.37%
amenity + addr:postcode = 2.24%
amenity + building = 0.54%
Konkon153 (2021-07-09 18:04:59+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Holthusen vollständig angepasst ]
ivanbranco (2021-08-23 14:51:50+00:00): Hi andershl,

name:dk means danish? in that case it should be name:da
andershl (2021-08-23 15:10:11+00:00): Yeah, old typo.
andershl (2021-08-23 15:11:00+00:00): But which point?
ivanbranco (2021-08-23 15:12:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8907974822
andershl (2021-08-23 15:24:10+00:00): Nope, it was Keglen/Sugar Loaf in Kangerlussuak. The other one is here https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=c5c7d9d52a264980a24911d7d33914b5
tux67 (2021-07-10 12:45:03+00:00): Hi,
hier hast du die Quelle genannt - das ist prima - iD bettet die Lichtbildquelle auch automatisch mit ein. 
Bei anderen Changes, deren Inhalt sich nicht aus den Luftbilddaten ergibt, wäre es auch wünschenswert Changesets mit für andere  nachvollziehbaren Quellenangaben für deine Mitmapper zu versehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107721212
Lee Carré (2021-07-31 02:01:05+00:00): Excellent; thanks.

Helps with routing while on foot (and warning while on wheels).
Lee Carré (2021-08-01 12:58:28+00:00): Having reviewed them, several were closed without being (properly) resolved (best to leave them open), or the changes didn't match what was surveyed. Have reopened the incomplete / incorrect ones.
rskedgell (2021-07-09 18:53:56+00:00): Fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107721817
Lee Carré (2021-07-31 01:58:20+00:00): A bunch (if not most) of these are ones I added; thanks.

I'm getting better at improving my feature-to-note ratio 🙂.
Lee Carré (2021-08-01 12:27:26+00:00): Having reviewed them, several were closed without being (properly) resolved (best to leave them open), or the changes didn't match what was surveyed. Have reopened the incomplete / incorrect ones.
tux67 (2021-07-10 12:57:06+00:00): Ist die Parkplatzufahrt mit der dahinterliegenden Garagenhofauffart von der Fringsstraße verbunden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107721975
novabeat (2021-10-16 06:42:16+00:00): Hi. I noticed that you added a bunch of sidewalks to Lilla Alby that are (like this for example) end randomly somewhere.
I was wondering if that's the intention as this makes it really hard to use any routing in this area. 
Lilla Alby also really stands out as the sidewalks are explicitly mapped while in the surroundings it's more a feature of the roads (tagged with sidewalk tags).
ecksun (2021-10-17 11:13:40+00:00): > I was wondering if that's the intention as this makes it really hard to use any routing in this area.

Sometimes they do just end. Sometimes I dont know what happens down the road (because I never went further when mapping). So to some degree I guess it is intentional :)

What exactly makes routing hard? The fact it ends abruptly? How do you figure out that routing is bad?

> I was wondering if that's the intention as this makes it really hard to use any routing in this area. 

Alright. I like that it is more accurate and there are several situations where I havent been able to map the topology without separate ways.

What would you like me to do?
novabeat (2021-11-07 16:26:26+00:00): Hi. Sorry for the late reply. Somehow the notification email got sorted into my spam folder.

About the routing: Here is an example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=59.35989%2C17.97050%3B59.35832%2C17.97477#map=18/59.35889/17.97320

As you can see there, as you don't connect the sidewalks to anything, it can't be used to efficiently route you via those sidewalks.
eggie (2021-07-13 13:48:24+00:00): Beste evl5.. Editor iD heeft de neiging alles aan elkaar te plakken. Je kunt dat voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Het gasveld ligt weer los.
MVG
eggie
Lee Carré (2021-07-31 01:55:35+00:00): Isn't that http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer ?
lyctkel (2024-10-15 15:01:36+00:00): Hi bkil,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3488434859 you wrote recycling:glass_bottles:colour=yes.
Did you mean recycling:glass_bottles:colour=coloured?
Further you wrote recycling:glass_white=yes.
Do you mean truly white opaque glass  or transparent glass?
In case of transparent glass it would be recycling:glass_bottles:colour=clear;coloured, otherwise recycling:glass_bottles:colour=coloured;white.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling for details.
lyctkel (2024-10-16 07:58:42+00:00): It's the same situation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3488434859
lyctkel (2024-10-16 08:01:11+00:00): Sorry I meant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8910562260
bkil (2024-10-16 08:41:13+00:00): Please do not send a comment to each and every editor in Hungary about this for each and every instance. We started mapping it in the most commonly appearing way possible at the given time. In Hungary, we have three recycling programs: one operated by mohu for a deposit within shops, one that is available to each household (not mapped) and one that occurs on public property such as this one. In the last case, it can have four kinds of containers: one for communal waste, one for combined "metal & plastics" (mostly cans), one separate for "white glass" (untinted or achromatic) and one for "coloured glass" (tinted). After your inquiry, we have started a discussion about it in our Matrix room https://matrix.to/#/#osm-jeloles:matrix.org and we will also document the result of our discussion on https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k#Pad I recommend further discussion either on the talk page of the latter or on chat. Thanks for understanding
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 15:23:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8908040556 - is GoodFellow name of the office?
PKS POZNAŃ SA (2021-12-10 07:42:21+00:00): Most jest już otwarty ,
https://srem.naszemiasto.pl/otwarcie-mostu-na-kanale-ulgi-rzeki-warty-w-sremie/ga/c1-8572751/zd/67329011
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-09 10:16:07+00:00): باسلام
ضمن تقدیر از تلاش شما، در بلوار فجر نرسیده به میدان حکیم نظامی، دوربرگردانی داریم که به صورت لینک بلوار ثبت شده بود و شما به جاده مسکونی تغییر داده‌اید.
دوربرگردان بلوارها لینک همان بلوار هستند. البته اتصال کوچه‌ به خیابان، در صورتی که خیابان دو طرفه باشد و یک سمت آن محدودیتی داشته باشد (مانند خط ویژه)، از اتصال همان کوچه استفاده می کنیم.
MURrashed (2022-08-11 22:26:18+00:00): ممنون از معلومات شما
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-16 18:32:46+00:00): با آرزوی سلامتی و سربلندی
jptolosa (2021-07-12 01:24:56+00:00): Hola, se trata de una mala práctica utilizar "roca desnuda" para todo los terrenos de alta montaña que veas, pues también son pedregales o ninguna de las dos. En algún la información errónea deberá ser eliminada o convertida. Ojalá no te lo estés tomando como una carrera por llenar los espacios vacíos.
Saludos.
AllenWedge (2021-07-09 20:37:55+00:00): Trail map link got cut off, here it is: https://www.vof.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/VOF-BRMNAP-Trail-Map.pdf
user_2066394 (2021-07-29 08:51:58+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=97&error=151291280
literan (2021-07-10 11:41:38+00:00): а это точно школа? выглядит как детский сад
superkiria (2021-07-10 12:56:34+00:00): на сайте написано, что это и детский сад и школа, могут учиться в возрасте от 2 до 18 лет. В названии слово школа точно есть.
Нужно поменять обозначение? (по вики название нужно на территории, перенесу его с последующими правками)
literan (2021-07-11 10:43:27+00:00): черт, вот это сложный случай :) я бы тогда оставил школой. Но все теги по канону лучше перенести со здания на территорию
superkiria (2021-07-11 14:54:24+00:00): Правка: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107785896
gileri (2021-07-09 21:32:15+00:00): Bonjour Stéphane,

Merci pour cette contribution !

Pour information Google Maps ne nous autorise pas à utiliser leurs données pour contribuer. Ça peut conduire à la suppression de vos changements.

Si vous avez vu sur le terrain ces parking aucun soucis, il faudra juste à l'avenir éviter d'utiliser ou citer Google Maps.

Il existe aussi Bing (Streetside), Mapillary ou Kartaview pour les vues sur le terrain, qui eux autorise l'utilisation pour OSM.
stephaneColson (2021-07-10 18:37:10+00:00): OK c'est bien noté (pour la prochaine fois). Je connais très bien ces arceaux, J'avais mis la View si quelqu'un voulait vérifier.

Merci
JuanjoMC (2021-07-10 13:20:25+00:00): Hi,

I changed the left/right names. See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107746979

This place has been completely reworked recently, the roundabout is gone, the Mutsaartplein/plaats is now a dead end street and the portion between the Pizza Hut and Sint-Annalaan is a pedestrian area.

Something in my todo list.
Cypri67 (2021-07-13 20:56:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajoutez certain bâtiments manquant. Or certain n'existe plus sur le terrain, j'habite à proximité je peu vous prendre des photos. C'est l'imagerie satellite qui n'est pas à jour. Merci.
MaptainPhasma (2021-07-09 21:18:37+00:00): Upload occurred earlier than intended, source was actually Maxar Premium Imagery
ivanbranco (2022-04-09 08:41:36+00:00): Hi VARVAR8,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8908280169/history

this node has an invalid place=* value, could you check it out please?
VARVAR8 (2022-06-16 12:54:01+00:00): Thank you. Already corrected.
Jakka (2021-07-11 09:57:00+00:00): de ingetekende gebouwen benoem je als school... maar recente verbouwingen lijkt de vorm niet meer overeen te stemmen .....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107726976
pi11 (2021-07-11 13:42:40+00:00): Dank voor de verbetering Jakka. Ik heb mijn fout normaal gezien rechtgezet met mijn meest recente changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107726976
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Lee Carré (2021-07-09 22:07:25+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
eggie (2021-07-10 05:46:41+00:00): Dag Hans.. Je vraagt feedback.
Dit lijkt me correct mits je natuurlijk zeker weet dat er echt een bankje staat.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-10 05:48:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2021-07-11 18:16:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Nicely drawn apartment buildings. The look awesome.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107728492
eggie (2021-07-10 05:52:36+00:00): Dag Hans.. Dit is niet correct. We gebruiken voor bomen niet de name=  tagging... behalve als de boom een 'eigennaam' heeft. Dat komt zelden voor.
Gebruik
species= Corylus avellana
species:nl=Hazelaar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-10 06:09:13+00:00): De tagging heb ik aangepast conform wiki
MVG
eggie
angys (2021-07-09 22:40:52+00:00): -5, 0 offset
tonyf1 (2021-11-01 06:38:32+00:00): see  Changeset #113218912
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 22:05:43+00:00): Partial reversion  Changeset #112628943
ravali_78 (2021-07-13 04:52:53+00:00): Hi Greeshma Nerella,
I have fixed the alignment of dragged node.Kindly check with NODE: 8515565095,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107873944.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107728824
DressyPear4 (2021-07-10 13:39:42+00:00): Olá, não há necessidade de adicionar nomes genérico como "Área verde"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107729000