piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2018-07-03 22:41:32+00:00): Hi,
the relation for Valla Reserve has a name .. but no physical presence .. like a park. And if the relation is a park then it would include the parking, picnic and building areas within the park. So it is really just a simple way. 

And then the boundaries. Use the LIP Base Map for these .... much better than a survey as it has the legal boundaries. 

I have deleted the relation and edited things in the area.
zarl (2016-05-25 12:29:03+00:00): Das stimmt, nach der Definition im wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dhalt ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2499299163 tatsächlich nur ein Haltepunkt. Die beiden zusätzlichen Gleise für den Fernverkehr gelten ja wohl nicht als Überholmöglichkeit. Weichen gibt es im Haltestellenbereich jedenfalls nicht.
Supaplex (2015-11-29 12:21:32+00:00): 話說臺南市的資料授權相容開放街圖，可以直接拿資料集匯入了，而且還有編號和英文名稱
aseerel4c26 (2015-12-04 21:15:25+00:00): revertiert mit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35757154
adamh (2015-12-03 02:08:48+00:00): Hi girabibit, thanks for your contributions. You list the source as 'knowledge', but I don't understand how this can be the case in order to get the building geometries correct. I suspect that the source is in reality Bing imagery, and that the name and tags are based on local knowledge. So perhaps the source tags should be source=Bing, source:name=Local Knowledge

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
girabbit (2015-12-03 05:27:14+00:00): You are correct; I thought source only related to the metadata tags but reviewing that wiki page, it seems it refers to geometry as well. I'll update accordingly when I get a chance. Thanks
xack (2016-09-20 11:03:42+00:00): Oh dear. Sorry about that (I was the one who moved it), I got the Blue Ginger and Blue Rickshaw confused.

Thanks!
GerdP (2015-12-02 11:16:02+00:00): Hi there!
I changed highway=path;track to track.
It seems that the app Go Map!! produces these invalid tags, or was it intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383429862
BernardKoh123 (2020-04-30 18:05:57+00:00): Thanks for making the changes.
freeExec (2015-11-30 08:00:31+00:00): Показательный пример доверяй, но проверяй http://share.mapbbcode.org/evaeh
Aleks-Berlin (2015-11-29 15:03:48+00:00): wrong title: fixed bad postcode
GerdP (2015-11-30 11:03:19+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed a typo  
highway=giveway instead of give_way.
I did not yet change it because I think
the tag should not be used on a junction.
It is not clear who has to give way.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25303798
Neil Dewhurst (2015-11-30 17:28:38+00:00): Hello Gerd P.,

Thank you for your comment. Yes you are right, the sign (and line) are beside the road island just before the "real" intersection. I have corrected the node position and spelling for tag now, and will be more careful (better informed) in future!

I wish you very many happy mappings. And also a Merry Christmas, quite soon...

Neil Dewhurst - Lyon France
GerdP (2015-11-30 17:44:39+00:00): Thanks for the nice feedback :-)
zimba (2015-11-29 14:25:45+00:00): War die Verschiebung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/652966147 Absicht?
jeka p (2015-12-04 14:04:31+00:00): Nein - war sicher ein Fehler! Könntest Du, bitte, zurücksetzen? ...wäre das der richtige Weg: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter ?
zimba (2015-12-04 14:25:11+00:00): Okay, zurueck gesetzt auf die richtige Position. Eh mit dem Reverter-Plugin, da es nur ein einziger Node ist waer ein einfaches Verschieben aber auch moeglich gewesen. lg
GerdP (2015-11-30 09:44:45+00:00): Hi there!

I've found the tag highway=crossing on a waterway, changed it to tunnel=culvert.
OK?
GerdP (2015-11-30 09:45:40+00:00): Forgot the links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383444320
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
kuede (2015-11-30 20:35:10+00:00): Hi Gerd, fine for me. Sometimes editing too quickly in JOSM with the previous value still in the properties dialog ;-) (or mixing up shortcuts)
-kuede
GerdP (2015-11-30 20:37:52+00:00): OK, thanks for the feedback :-)
Allroads (2023-01-31 15:24:09+00:00): Hoi Ad,
Ik kom er achter dat overtaking:agricultural=yes niet klopt.
Want het zegt, dat agricultural wel mag overtaken bij yes, dus inhalen, verkeersbord F1 met onderbord uitgezonderd tractorsymbool, zegt juist dat alle andere de tractor mogen inhalen.

verkeersbord F3
overtaking:hgv=no zegt juist, dat de vrachtwagen niet mag inhalen, Alle andere mag iedereen inhalen.
Hoe het dan wel moet daar twijfel ik over.
Belangrijkste is dan overtaking=no
Wat dan voor het onderbord, dat is de vraag.

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.700015959&lng=3.776625395&z=17
Luuuddooo (2015-11-29 19:17:07+00:00): Bonjour, le jardin de l'Université est listé comme jardin publique sur le site de la mairie de Toulouse: http://www.toulouse.fr/web/environnement/parcs-et-jardins/centre-ville
donc je pense qu'il ne faudrait pas mettre access=private
zstadler (2017-12-12 15:48:47+00:00): Hello Dr Abdelbaset Rabaiah

In this edit you have changed "Emmat Li'yal" 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257808668/history
from "unclassified" to "bridleway".
.
Is this "A way intended for use by horse riders"?
zstadler (2021-07-11 22:08:45+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107799327
Harry Wood (2015-12-01 02:59:54+00:00): I just reverted this changeset, because it seemed to delete a whole chunk of the river here. Particularly this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11369668 
Woopsie! Did you do that by accident? or what's going on here? See also forum discussion http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52862
Supaplex (2016-08-27 07:22:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
zarl (2015-11-30 16:48:26+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, ich bin eben selbst über eine Osmose-Abfrage über diesen Fehler gestolpert...
GerdP (2015-11-30 11:13:43+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed a node with
highway=mini_roundabout;crossing
which was part of a roundabout.
Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35663146
Please add also nodes for the other crossings at this junction , I am not a local and Bing doesn't show the roundabout.
user_5359 (2015-11-29 21:57:52+00:00): Willkommen bi OSM! Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Bist Du Dir sicher , dass die Firma auf dem Hof des Hauses firmiert?
sherh221b (2015-12-02 16:27:36+00:00): Ja, die Information findet man auf deren Website.

http://www.medizin-pharmatechnik.de/contact-us/
user_5359 (2015-12-02 17:02:35+00:00): Selbst das Satelittenbild ordnet der Adresse einem Haus zu, aber wir schreiben ja nicht von Google (dieser Kartenanbieter wird dort verwendet) ab. Ohne Vorortkontrolle welches Gebäude offiziell die Hausnummer 6 besitzt wird wohl hier nicht weiterkommen.
sherh221b (2015-12-02 18:58:00+00:00): Ich wohne in der Gegend und bin mir deswegen sicher, dass es so passt.
Derick Rethans (2015-11-29 16:14:32+00:00): Hi! And welcome to OSM! We don't really store coffee (or any other goods') prices in OpenStreetMap. I doubt a coffee in there is 5 *dollar* either - it's in the UK!
SomeoneElse (2015-11-30 10:38:03+00:00): (for anyone stumbling across this edit unaware of the history) Coffeedex is/was a "single-tag proof of concept editor" - see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/tmcw/diary/28138 for a discussion about it.  It's more about "how can we get new people to update OSM with different data in different ways" than "how much does coffee cost here".
Derick Rethans (2015-11-30 10:46:56+00:00): I've reverted the change set now
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:43:15+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383468600
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:58:00+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84959157
maning (2016-02-02 15:12:53+00:00): I don't think naming highways as "Decepticon-Autobots Relations Tunnel" and note as "The Rail of the Train Back To t Future Way"  is correct.  Please revert this.
simone (2015-11-29 19:07:14+00:00): ottime le nuove campiture!
Alecs01 (2015-11-30 20:35:12+00:00): concordo :)
user_5359 (2015-11-29 21:43:35+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes: Bitte beachtet dass weder eine Arzt- noch Hebammen-Praxis ein Hospital ist. Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Hebamme
Self-Perfection (2016-06-03 22:02:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы в этой правке указали адрес вебсайта в названии объектов, но это ошибка. Обратите внимание, что в название (name) объекта в OSM вносится _только_ имя собственное, для всех прочих атрибутов придуманы (или стоит придумать) специализированные теги, если же специализированный тег не находится, то дополнительно пояснение (description). Подробнее в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name В данном случае когда вы хотели добавить адрес вебсайта следовало использовать тег contact:website ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:contact:website )
neuhausr (2015-12-01 18:14:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please remember that information you add is for all users of OSM data, so your changing the name of the building from "Parklawn Estates" to "Home" is not helpful and actually removing information from the map. Looks like there might still be plenty of other things to map in this area, though!
dieterdreist (2015-11-30 11:08:56+00:00): Please be more specific with your changeset descriptions. "fix bad country" doesn't allow to understanding what you were doing or why.

Please note that place=locality is 100% wrong for a used building. It is a tag for an uninhabited place with a name. It can't be inside a city. It is a generic tag for an unspecific toponym (i.e. a more specific tag would normally be better).
Aleks-Berlin (2015-11-30 22:10:48+00:00): I just wanted to remove place=country, but was not sure what the original author had in mind. I thought about fixme, but you are right it was only a half fix. Sorry
trigpoint (2015-11-30 19:53:26+00:00): Hi
Are you sure that when you surveyed http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2030692588/history it was a speed limit sign? A truvello is normally a speed camera, but you would have noticed that along with the only 80kph speed limit sign in the UK?
I am sure this was a mistake, because making an undiscussed global mass edit that touches such a wide variety of tags would be wrong and I'm sure you wouldn't do that.
chillly (2015-11-30 20:01:11+00:00): This is an undiscussed mass edit.

Please revert it now.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-30 22:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35675358 .

LeTopographeFou, please do not make further mass edits like this.  As you have found out from the comments that other mappers have made on your most recent changes, it's very easy for you to misunderstand what data means.  Often data that is flagged as "invalid" by JOSM is very useful, because it highlights work by an inexperienced mapper or where something has gone very wrong (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103231400 below for an example of this).  If you change this data so that it no longer appears to be "invalid" it will still be wrong (what's in OSM won't match what's on the ground) but people won't be able to find the problem via QA sites any more.  Also (like the Truvelo camera on the other changeset), if you don't understand what some data means, don't change it to something that you do understand.  You can ask the person who added the data in the first place, you can ask local mappers by adding an OSM note, or you can ask on a country-specific mailing list or forum, or on an international list.

In response to your comment elsewhere, the Data Working Group does view changes that dilute the accuracy of data within OSM, when carried out as here in spite of the opposition of other mappers, as akin to vandalism and will revert them.

However, you are welcome to continue editing OpenStreetMap provided that you do not engage in mechanical edits that destroy the meaning of data like this.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse)
On behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
LeTopographeFou (2015-12-03 22:13:19+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the revert SomeoneElse. No excuse for my defense, I have bitten off more than I can chew whithout understanding that by fixing tags I was introducing errors in some of them.
Reguarding the node Trigpoint pointed out, after an OSM/Bing/Google Maps survey it appears that this node is outdated: the maxspeed is 50mph and there is a node with the speed camera next to it. So this "80mph Truvelo" should be deleted I guess.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-03 22:52:08+00:00): Of course; we can't use Bing Maps or Google Maps for copyright reasons :)
However, in this case I can confirm that the speed limit on the A45 (at least the other side of Ryton on Dunsmore a couple of years ago) was indeed 50 mph.  However maxspeed=80 (in km/h) is of course the same as "mapspeed=50 mph".  There are plenty of West Midlands local mappers, so I'm sure they will correct if wrong (and quite possibly change the anomalous tagging that you spotted to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera - if there's still a speed camera there of course; in three years it might have moved).
flohoff (2015-11-30 11:48:15+00:00): Hi,
Prima - ich war mir bei der Nummer nicht ganz sicher. Meine Mutter wohnt in der Heidestraße. Weisst du auch ob der Fernsprecher Fröbelstraße Ecke Haegestraße noch existiert? Da habe ich viel mehr zweifel ...

Flo
flohoff (2015-11-30 11:50:50+00:00): Hier habe ich überigens die Stelle an der du den ausgetragen hast Fotografiert ... Da war es schon weg ... 31.10.2015

http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/kK75plb7JKmwOorSN5caoA
flohoff (2015-11-30 11:52:03+00:00): Der Fröbelstraße ecke Haegestraße ist auch schon mind. seit mitte letzten Jahres nicht mehr da:
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/XwTkYUIP9P0qS6sUATJu3g
lichtbringer (2015-11-30 16:27:55+00:00): Ja, ich meine sogar schon länger. Dafür fehlt an der Barthstraße ein Telefon. Ist auf meiner Liste.
muralito (2015-11-30 11:19:09+00:00): ¿Que tipo de errores introdujo el cambio que te motivo a revertirlo por completo?
Al revertirlo parece que se pierden algunos POIs. ¿Chequeaste bien antes de revertirlo?
nicolas17 (2015-11-30 16:27:22+00:00): No había ningún cambio útil, y había muchos errores como nodos 1400 y 1500 uno al lado del otro, una esquina cambiada de 699 a 123, se separaron POIs con housenumber que antes eran parte de la vía de interpolación (mejoraban la precisión), etc.

¿Tenés algún ejemplo concreto de un POI que se haya perdido con este revert?
vdmit (2015-11-29 20:08:15+00:00): Описание пакета правок ошибочное. Правильное: Подъезды к Мангупу
surveyor54 (2015-11-30 09:44:36+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier einige Wege  und Pfade gemapped, die dann irgendwo enden.
Wenn sie dort wirklich enden bitte korrekt mit noexit=yes abschließen, wenn sie weitergehen und die sie nicht vollständig erfasst hast, mit continue=yes taggen.

Herzliche Grüße
surveyor54
AymOSM (2015-11-30 19:40:08+00:00): Würde ich nur zu gern! Ich weiß, daß es irgendwie geht, finde aber im online-Editor weder bei den "Points" etwas Passendes, noch bei den Einstellungen für die "Lines". Auch Googlen hat nicht weitergeholfen. Wenn Du einen Link zu einer Anleitung hast: her damit ;-)
VG Ay
GerdP (2015-11-30 15:36:20+00:00): I'd like to revert this changeset. 
It adds a lot of duplicated and mistagged ways.
OK?
arvdk (2017-12-06 15:26:57+00:00): de link is 'dood'. Misschien doorverwijzen naar "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mechanical_Edits/Math1985/Dutch_Shop_Names" ?
Math1985 (2017-12-06 15:34:39+00:00): Done!
atpl_pilot (2015-11-30 00:57:52+00:00): Die HausNr 9 Wasserburger Straße ist laut Brandenburgischen Katasteramt etwa an diesen Koordinaten: 
52.094660, 13.825527

Laut Katasteramt gibt es für dieses Haus keine HausNr. Vielmehr ist die HausNr 13 lt. Katasteramt dem Nachbarhaus zugeordnet.

Diese falsche Information wird auch in Google Maps angegeben. Solche Bugs sind absichtlich von den großen Kartenprovidern gemacht worden, um Urheberrechtsverletzungen aufzudecken. Sollte Ihre Information von Google stammen, dann bitte sehr schnell löschen.
j-wills (2016-04-03 16:57:38+00:00): Приветствую! Что-то делали с ул. Академика Семёнова?
JOSM выдаёт ошибку в отношении
j-wills (2016-04-03 17:06:59+00:00): не понял что конкретно. Подправил все отношения на этой улице. Всё ОК
Dilon Pait (2016-04-16 09:50:27+00:00): Я не понял, при чем тут josm я в нём не работаю. Уже не помню, что делал. Добавлял дорожки наверное.
Thomas8122 (2015-11-30 14:47:58+00:00): Was du jetzt als Namen vergeben hast, steht so nicht draussen dran!
GerdP (2015-11-30 09:37:42+00:00): Hi there!

You have changed a few ways to highway=escape here.
Was that intended ? The roads don't look
like emergency roads, more like service roads. See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Descape
geow (2015-11-30 11:53:54+00:00): Hi, wie hast du denn geschafft, die topaktuellen Bayern DOP80 (2015) in iD als Hintergrund zu nutzen?

Danke,
geow
Tomas Straupis (2015-11-30 07:47:40+00:00): Lietuvoje nėra tokios gyvenvietės „Senieji Gudeliai“. Yra tik „Gudeliai“.
raccoss (2018-04-09 09:21:28+00:00): Ciao. Ho provato a fare il sentiero segnato come Ravera Freidour ma la traccia non corrispondeva: a quota 95 diverge verso est (verso il Colle Aragno Est). I segni bianchi e Rossi del CAI sembrano recenti: quanto tempo fa hai percorso questo sentiero?
enricomac (2018-04-09 09:28:16+00:00): ciao, a quota 95 cosa intendi, 950 forse? il sentiero è stato percorso in MTB nel fine autunno 2015. non era segnato da bolli bianchi e rossi, ma da del nastro vedo bianco è rosso su qualche pianta. Mi avevano detto che era nato come pistino per discesa MTB.
raccoss (2018-04-09 10:28:02+00:00): Ciao.
Si, ho scritto 95 invece che 950.
Adesso credo di capire, oltre quella quota il sentiero segnato si assottiglia e viaggia quasi in quota sul pendio abbastanza ripido. Sarebbe stato abbastanza difficoltoso e pericoloso da fare in MTB.
Noi siamo saliti poi in cresta per vedere se si trovava il sentiero che tu hai indicato, ma non abbiamo trovato segni: purtroppo non a terra non abbiamo potuto vedere se c'era una traccia a terra perchè era tutto innevato.
A questo punto, io modificherei la tua traccia segnalandola come "traccia di sentiero" e aggiungerei quella che abbiamo fatto noi la scorsa settimana.
Grazie per la risposta.
enricomac (2018-04-09 10:37:44+00:00): ok, questa traccia l'avevo inserita proprio per segnalare il pistino che avevano fatto per le MTB in discesa, in quanto i nastri sarebbero scomparsi a breve. Comunque metti pure il tuo sentiero, io modifico in discesa MTB la mia.
Gh0stz0x (2018-04-13 10:29:55+00:00): Io iserirei anche un note per spiegare la situazione ed un fixme per effettuare un survey senza neve. 😁
naoliv (2015-12-11 19:27:54+00:00): Very good!
GerdP (2015-11-30 10:08:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you use 
highway=bus_station
Did you mean
highway=bus_stop ?
See 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
literan (2015-11-30 13:18:21+00:00): Приветствую! по поводу этого полигона https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383525309 - natural=heath это тег для обозначения вересковой пустоши, там действительно такое? ни разу в московском регионе не встречал подобного
vdmit (2015-11-30 13:49:12+00:00): Ещё раз перечитал wiki. И правда, там скорее natural=fell. Память подвела, щас поправлю.
vdmit (2015-11-30 13:51:01+00:00): Или даже scrub скорее, там кустов всё-таки много.
atpl_pilot (2015-11-29 23:51:11+00:00): Dann machen wir es eben öffentlich. Ich reverte dieses Vandalismus-Löschung von Ihnen, da Sie leider nicht imstande sind, die Regeln von OSM zu beherzigen. Ich habe Sie auf Ihre Tagging-Fehler bezügl. Gebäude im Gebäude etc in einer persönlichen Nachricht unterreichtet und Ihnen aufgezeigt, wie Sie solche Fehler vermeiden können. Als Beispiel habe ich dann das Gebäude Elfriede-Tygör-Straße 4a-4d in 3D getaggt, so dass Sie eine gute Vorlage haben. Sie setzen sich darüber hinweg, löschen mein Edit komplett und tragen Ihren vorherigen Unsinn wieder ein.

Darüber hinaus sind Sie nicht einmal in der Lage, die Adressen richtig einzutragen. Unsere Stadt heißt Berlin und nicht Berlin-Friedrichsfelde. Korrekt wäre: addr:city=Berlin + addr:suburb=Friedrichsfelde. Außerdem wäre dann noch addr:country=DE einzutragen, was Sie auch vergessen haben. Bitte halten Sie sich an die Regeln von OSM.

Ferner wird bei einem 3D tagging anschließend alle Gebäude Parts mit dem Gebäude Außenring in eine Relation des Typ "building" gesetzt.
imagico (2015-11-30 15:32:21+00:00): Hallo Alpinfuchs,

ich denke natural=beach ist hier falsch, beach (Strand) ist eine durch die Wellen geformte Struktur an der Küste, eine Sandbank ist kein Strand, das vorherige natural=shoal ist hier deutlich passender. 

Und kommentiere bitte Deine changesets damit man erkennen kann, was Du jeweils gemacht hast.
Sanniu (2019-07-08 10:27:55+00:00): Hi
You have added landuse=military here and now Osmose (or rather JOSM validator) complains that "landuse=military on a node. Should be drawn as an area."
Are you sure that we need above tag?
If so, can you help me to draft a bug against Osmose/JOSM validator?
Kilkenni (2016-03-28 15:10:17+00:00): Червоний Хрест
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3868156451
вже був позначений: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3084001205 . Не треба позначати його в другий раз. І ЧХ - не є лікарня, це саме НДО (не державна організація).
Approksimator (2016-03-28 17:12:15+00:00): Малася на увазі сам дошка на фасаді будівлі, а не організація.
adamh (2015-12-03 02:17:25+00:00): Hi Leon K,
You certainly get a lot of mapping done! :)
You and I map similar areas, so I'd like to ask if you could possibly add Changeset Comments to your work?
I like to see what's been updated near me and it's difficult to have to drill into each changeset to get a flavour of the change.
Much appreciated,
Adam
smaprs (2015-11-30 10:48:28+00:00): local está errado
smaprs (2015-11-30 10:48:45+00:00): local está errado
smaprs (2015-11-30 10:45:05+00:00): Já existe uma praça no local. Não se deve duplicar área=yes. Já foram lhe enviadas mensagens solicitando que você entre em contato. * Consulte informações básicas sobre como mapear na página: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil.
segubi (2024-08-13 17:08:18+00:00): Ich kann den Namefix für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211761500 nicht gut nachvollziehen. "Schneidemühler Straße 67" steht auch heute noch auf dem Kasten drauf. name=ref ist mir unklar. Ist das Absicht oder kann das weg? Nach dem Wiki ist "name=xyz" für power=substation "recommended" aber "ref" habe ich nirgendwo stehen sehen.
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2024-08-13 18:44:14+00:00): Das sollte von 

name=....

auf 

ref=...

werden, da habe ich wohl das falsche Eingabefeld erwischt damals.

Ist repariert jetzt.
yasunari (2015-11-30 11:39:58+00:00): GJ!
間違っても大丈夫。
こうやってだれかが指摘/修正してくれます。
Happy Mapping!
dgitto (2015-11-30 21:07:57+00:00): Via don Giulia Motta, davvero??
tekim (2020-07-03 16:36:59+00:00): Hi Brian,  "Maxwell Ranch Road" (if that is in fact its name) (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383559168#map=14/40.7859/-105.4357) is a tricky call as to whether it is a path or a track. It is probably legally permissible for the rancher who leases the land to drive a motor vehicle on it, and of course the land manager could as well.  At one point someone certainly did given the infrastructure around there (old buildings, irrigation projects). Whether anyone does at this point is difficult to say.  All of the bridges have been washed out  or removed (strange they all seem to be upstream from what appears to be their original locations). The resulting stream crossings would be the only challenge for a vehicle, but I would guess that a non-stock 4x4 could make it.