piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-07-09 14:24:26+00:00): Thanks for your mapping efforts on this project.
One of by tasks of validator is to review at random mappings of a mapper to check if the mappings are in accordance to the HOTSM quality standards.
From the 151 buildings you mapped on several tasks 106 were reported as bad squared.
A further look learned me that your mappings are rather accurate mapped but not always squared
This frustrates the job of validators who have to correct all these mappings. It cost so much more time to correct them rather than map them correct in 1 session.

An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
ToniE (2020-07-03 12:28:08+00:00): Hallo Marius,

das mit den Bus-Relationen ist so eine Sache und der iD Editor ist auch nicht sehr gut geeignet für so etwas.

Beim Bus 843 existieren schon zwei Relationen https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_843

Laut Info vom MVV (für uns nutzbar) gibt es eine Variante "Olching - Emmering" aber nicht.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/trips.php?network=DE-BY-MVV&route_id=19-843-s20-1

Das sind dann auch schon die beiden Links auf QS-Seiten, die wir für den MVV haben bei PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/)

1.) GTFS Information vom MVV als 'SOLL'-Daten, das was existiert: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/routes.php?network=DE-BY-MVV

2.) PTNA-Analyse von dem was in OSM existiert als 'IST'-Analyse: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html

Du kannst mich bzgl Bus-Relationen und PTv2 und ... gerne per PM fragen.

Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende
Toni
iWowik (2020-07-06 06:41:39+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Не вынуждайте других участников ваши изменения исправлять или откатывать
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149524393/history
fiscal (2021-03-01 11:14:59+00:00): Hi Antin,

a Wikidata ID should only used by a single OSM element. Especially for tools like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sophox it is necessary that only https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3160619 and not all of its members have Q188940 linked.

Kind regards,
fiscal
Frans S (2020-08-31 13:26:43+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping work lacks accuracy and details.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-04 09:13:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

A remark. 

Please map more accurately and square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor

Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 

Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

When mapping buildings partly hidden by trees do not follow the outlines of a tree but extrapolate the building picture.  Often there is a shadow on the ground near a building. Don' include these in your mapping.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Nmxosm (2020-07-04 11:15:06+00:00): Hello Cro_Guy,

I have reverted this changeset in https://osm.org/changeset/87528536 because it removes lots of details that have been present before. However I included your changes regarding contact information.

Greetings
Nmxosm
eggie (2020-07-03 11:31:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.



Lijkt me oke, maar vermoedelijk kopt het telnummer niet.
+31 0495 743 111

MVG,
Eggie
Nmxosm (2020-07-04 11:15:10+00:00): Hello Cro_Guy,

I have reverted this changeset in https://osm.org/changeset/87528536 because it removes lots of details that have been present before. However I included your changes regarding contact information.

Greetings
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2020-07-04 11:15:16+00:00): Hello Cro_Guy,

I have reverted this changeset in https://osm.org/changeset/87528536 because it removes lots of details that have been present before. However I included your changes regarding contact information.

Greetings
Nmxosm
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 19:49:59+00:00): deletado
bison166 (2020-07-03 12:22:58+00:00): ups...was ist hier passiert ?
MP ? warum ? und dann mit 2 outer
2 x Nr. 19
Für "Schießen" gibt es tag.
Ich würde den CS reverten die Gebäude neu zeichnen u. POI drauf
bison166 (2020-07-03 12:27:17+00:00): wir haben hier 2 Gebäude ( Anbau) was ist in den rechten drin ?
bison166 (2020-07-03 16:09:02+00:00): ich habe das mal neu gemappt.
schönes WE !
!bm (2020-07-03 11:39:40+00:00): Erg. zu source: 
Geoportal Berlin / Digitale farbige Orthophotos 2018,2019 (DOP20RGB); Geoportal Berlin / ALKIS Berlin - Gebäude, Flurstücke, Bauwerke
user_5359 (2020-07-03 19:27:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
bxl-forever (2020-10-17 19:45:22+00:00): Hello,
What kind of shop is this "Papillon"?
shop=yes is incomplete → it should use the proper category (clothes, convenience, or whatever).
eggie (2020-07-04 08:30:24+00:00): motor_vehicle=destination zou goed kunnen , maar het staat nergens. 
Ik heb tracktype=grade4 toegevoegd.
Eigenlijk hoort er ook een afslagbeperking te komen vanaf de Locht naar links . Dubbele doorgetrokken streep. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-04 08:58:40+00:00): ... en komende van de rotonde zou er een afslagbeperking moeten komen met 'alleen rechtdoor'..
eggie (2020-07-04 09:06:45+00:00): Afslagbeperkingen toegevoegd
maraf24 (2020-07-03 11:48:59+00:00): Wycofane - brak prawidłowych źródeł; wskazane źródło nie mówi nic o rozbiórce.
maraf24 (2020-08-25 14:53:17+00:00): Drogi i wiadukt wciąż istnieją.
M!dgard (2020-07-17 22:08:01+00:00): Hi Manta Benelux,

There are a few issues with your edits that we'd like you to address. Note that we hold paid editors to a higher standard than volunteer mappers. We're pretty sure you are editing as part of a SEO or similar business.

* If you want to be more transparent, you can write a short description of your company in your user description. In the topright menu on openstreetmap.org, go to My Settings and fill out Profile Description.

* You are adding a lot of points with the rather non-descript tag "shop=yes" ("Shop" in the iD editor). While a few such nodes are fine for shops that are really hard to classify, this is to be rather the exception. Please review the POIs you added so far and either add the specific shop type or remove them.
For details about each tag, you can search the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page ). If you can't find a good tag, we're happy to help search one, or we can create a new one for you if necessary. Find us through https://community.osm.be/resources/europe/belgium/ (the Matrix/IRC channel, mailinglist or forum) or reply to this changeset.

* You are from time to time adding points with name "… (invoice)". OpenStreetMap is not a business register, only POIs that are visible belong here. Mere invoice addresses are never wanted (even if there would be a "Company bvba" plaque at the door). These points have now been deleted.

* There have been 3 changeset comments on previous changesets of yours, but you do not seem to have reacted to the most recent 2.

* We don't write shop names in ALL CAPS if they're not an abbreviation because we don't want a screamy map. So instead of "ESCAPE", write "Escape".

* What is the source of the data you are adding? Are the companies themselves providing these data? If not, and if you're getting any portion of your data from another database, please double-check that you have the intellectual property rights to release them under the Contributor Terms that you accepted: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms#Rights_Granted .

We'd appreciate it if you could answer on this changeset comment before adding more data. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Thank you for your interest in OpenStreetMap and taking the time to contribute to the map.

M!dgard
OpenStreetMap Belgium
532910 (2020-08-02 17:50:58+00:00): Уважаемый, не надо писать в ref всякую чушь.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2020-07-03 13:32:40+00:00): At least the one from Route de l'Aeroport has topological importance that warrants elevated classification.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87503043
DanaeBrookCanyon (2020-07-07 00:41:31+00:00): Hi Jean-Marc, thank you for reaching out. After taking another look here I can see why you’ve upgraded the classification to tertiary so I went ahead and made those changes again.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2020-07-07 00:48:23+00:00): Thanks. Anyway, this area is currently undergoing lots of changes - I'm sure we have a clearer picture next year.
Frans S (2020-07-03 17:43:38+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping
Please pay more attention on squaring of the buildings you map. Each building has to be squared with the Q key,
Lots of buildings mapped by you are not proper squared
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-03 17:44:21+00:00): You can open this changeset again and square the buildings
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-04 12:00:40+00:00): Hello
I removed a number of bad shaped mappings>
This task 102 has been invalidated and needs to be mapped again.
Best regards
Wulfmorn (2020-07-03 12:45:51+00:00): Hi. Just one remark. There is little point to moving or editing the address markers. These are part of an automated import from Kartverket-data and manual changes will be overwritten. The advantage of this being a very complete and up to date dataset of addresses.
eggie (2020-07-03 13:01:52+00:00): Nou... de nul 'moet' juist weg... +31 is juist correct :)
eggie (2020-07-03 15:33:23+00:00): Aangepast.. openingstijden idem. Gaf foutmelding.. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-03 13:09:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review
Eitor iD wil je van alles laten invullen, maar dat hoeft niet.
Voor ruiters verboden staat er vast niet en bicycle=no is default op een voetpad.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-17 10:53:05+00:00): Een tip Rob.. In dit geval zou ik de straatnaam toevoegen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-03 13:22:45+00:00): Beste OSM gast.. ga nu eens heel precies kijken wat je hebt gedaan?
Het pad zit nergens aan vast aan de oostkant en aan de westkant aan het fietspad en dan loopt het een stukje terug in het niets?
Wat voegt dit nu toe?
Hoe kan ik de Vroonhoevelaan oversteken?
Routeren doet het allemaal niet.
Geen ook aan wat je toevoegt. dat er iets ontbreekt is niet interessant.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-03 15:19:02+00:00): Pad routeerbaar gemaakt.
marczoutendijk (2020-07-03 17:57:40+00:00): DWG:
blokkade ingesteld totdat gebruiker reageert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3789

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
AdVerburg (2020-07-18 10:23:30+00:00): Hi Stef,

Your node 7680250699 is connected with a 220 kV cable coming from platform beta, and the position is just 32 metres from that platform.
Your node 7680250700 is positioned just 9 metres from the alpha platform.
This seems to be not correct.
All / many nodes are tagged with "seamark:production_area:category=wind_farm", this tag is for the production_area not for an individual turbine.
All / many nodes are tagged as producing turbines (finished). As far as I know just a few turbines are operational already. So most will be in the construction stage, and should be tagged that way.

Yours sincerely Ad Verburg
M!dgard (2020-07-14 15:06:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

How were you able to survey these wind turbines, collecting their positions and names? According to the Notices to Mariners, isn't this area normally off-limits?

Thanks,
M!dgard
Chris HR (2020-07-15 09:13:19+00:00): Hi,
We work with the boat operators that take the engineers out to the wind farms to service the wind turbines. They have a full list of the turbine locations to allow them to do their job. That is where we get the data from.
Hope that makes sense!
Chris
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-07-17 21:28:34+00:00): Wow, really cool!

I guess you are all familiar with openinframap.org/ ?
eggie (2020-07-03 13:25:13+00:00): Dag Cees,  Vaak zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no
en evt. nog oneway:moped=no
Kijk je nog even svp. ?
MVG,
Eggie
ceesvbelle (2020-07-03 14:11:24+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Aangepast, zal het in't vervolg in de gaten houden. 
Groet Cees
eggie (2020-07-03 14:13:23+00:00): Top!
Frans S (2020-07-09 14:29:51+00:00): Thanks for your mapping efforts on this project.
One of by tasks of validator is to review at random mappings of a mapper to check if the mappings are in accordance to the HOTSM quality standards.
From the 260 buildings you mapped on several tasks 94 were reported as bad squared.
A further look learned me that your mappings are often irregular shaped.
When the roofline is hidden by trees, please extrapolate the roofline rather than follow the trees.

This frustrates the job of validators who have to correct all these mappings. It cost so much more time to correct them rather than map them correct in 1 session.

An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
DaveF (2020-07-03 14:33:47+00:00): Which aerial imagery did you use for these amendments, as you placed the Rush Hill way across a pavement?
Mike Baggaley (2020-07-03 14:49:46+00:00): Hi Dave, I used Bing, however, I only straightened lines slightly. The incoming flare from Rush hill had a kink in it. The whole roundabout is slightly off Bing, but I did not realign it as the image is not very clear. It looks like the whole roundabout needs to move SW slightly, which would likely resolve the problem.

Regards,
Mike
tomhukins (2022-08-05 15:33:51+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.  I notice that you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230064541 as a private service road, with no access tagged, but you have also tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822547069 as a permissive footpath although it only leads to the service road.  Assuming walkers using the footpath don't have to turn around, I wonder if part of the service road should also be tagged foot=permissive.
angys (2020-07-05 18:04:29+00:00): Same explanation, but place=hamlet really is a wrong tag at here
freeExec (2020-07-03 19:04:22+00:00): Ёмкость там или водонопорная башня - это всё не названия. Тип объекта обозначен тегами.
pio2_122 (2020-07-03 14:24:18+00:00): OSM to nie miejsce na prywatne notatki, a co dopiero w postaci fake'owych POI...

Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87507300
RicoElectrico (2020-08-27 11:59:45+00:00): Nazwa drzewa chyba jest w użyciu.
dval (2020-07-04 06:15:16+00:00): Hi, Георгий Гришин! Одну гору (peak) вы восстановили. А как быть с сервей поинтами, которые вы удалили, как будто их и не бывало? Какие основания для таких правок? Я не получил ответа от вас.
angys (2020-07-05 18:03:40+00:00): It is better to treat Sections/ss/usj as a residential area
Константин Гам (2020-07-04 13:08:28+00:00): Добавляя магазины на карту, пожалуйста добавляйте сразу время работы
user_8334278 (2020-07-03 14:41:06+00:00): the whole thing is Intermittent, seasonal,wet-season.
user_8334278 (2020-07-03 18:50:54+00:00): PS; unless it rains, water is coming from the sewage treatment plant.
Tatfahren (2024-12-23 09:58:00+00:00): Hallo DAB30,
In Bad Schandau wurde gestern der von dir erstellte Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822573604 gelöscht, da es sich angeblich um Privatgrund handelt.

Bei der Suche nach einer alternativen Zufahrt, habe ich gesehen das die Hausnummer 19a nicht in den Karten vom Vermessungsamt auffindbar ist. Kannst du dich noch erinnern was deine Quelle damals war, oder ob die 19a möglicherweise nur eine Gartenlaube von der 30 ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822573603

Vielleicht weißt du auch noch, ob der Weg wirklich wie vom angeblichen Besitzer geschrieben nicht als Zufahrt dient, sondern es noch eine alternative gibt.

Hier der Link zum changeset der es gelöscht hat, wenn du dort mit schreiben möchtest. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160492419
angys (2020-07-05 18:02:55+00:00): Hello, hamlet is just a type of tagging. Malaysian dont need to know about this as there is a kampung (village) word in the dictionary. But in OSM here, we use hamlet for smaller village and village in urban area, if not there willl be something like Bandar Sunwway, Kampung Kinrara, Selangor in address
Edmond Yap (2020-07-05 18:14:52+00:00): Icic. Thanks for the info. By the way, I notice in: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68670

You placed neighbourhood higher up in size than hamlet. Is it okay to interchange the two?
angys (2020-07-05 18:34:57+00:00): FYI, you can use neighbourhood for a Taman
hamlet for smaller kampung and kampung in urban area e.g. Klang Valley/Penang. Interchange mean change between them? I would suggest use based on their type. But now I an trying to make it as landuse=residential + place tag, you can refer to Penang or Sg Buloh I had maded recently. For USJ/SS/Section in PJ SA it is better to use quarter, or just draw a polygon for them. Remember not directly copying from Google, it is illegal. And you can create the multipolygon based on street name, its ok.
user_5359 (2020-07-03 19:22:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
mueschel (2020-07-06 08:22:38+00:00): Please make sure you don't add objects twice. Most of the POIs you added exist two times, once as an area and once as a node.
user_11166885 (2020-07-30 20:38:57+00:00): Ciao Lucione. In questo caso si dovrebbe mettere
name=Rio Rosani
alt:name=Rio Moreri
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:29:41+00:00): Please provide proper changeset description for the edits.
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:29:32+00:00): Please provide proper changeset description for the edits.
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:29:49+00:00): Please provide proper changeset description for the edits.
RobJN (2020-08-19 12:11:37+00:00): I've made some further improvements to the map of Westwood Student Mews. Are you able to check it please and make further adjustments if needed.
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:29:05+00:00): please provide proper changeset description for the edits.
zyphlar (2021-05-21 22:43:23+00:00): Hi Karthoo! I noticed you had Rainbow Connection listed as lgbt=only however as far as I can tell it's lgbt oriented but not necessarily exclusive (i.e. others are "practically banned" per the wiki). do you have better knowledge of this location?
drnoble (2020-07-05 14:58:00+00:00): Is this actually a shop? It looks more like an office from the outside?

We also typically create a new node inside the building for shops/offices, so that the numbers stay visible. Happy to update this if needed.
user_5359 (2020-07-03 19:21:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
eggie (2020-07-03 17:21:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Niet alles is goed gegaan.
Adresnide 2 en 4 heb je samengevoegd tot één adres?
Gebouwen in OSM zijn geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. beter niets aan veranderen. 
Ik kijk even of ik wat kan herstellen

Dit waren je edits.. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87510106
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-03 17:41:34+00:00): Elk begin is lastig.
Tramroute, adresnodes en gebouw hersteld.
Van het gebouw en het parkeerterrein heb je een multipolygoon tealtie gemaakt. Dat zal wel per abuis automatisch zijn gegaan met editor iD. Je had de de doorlopende lijn van het gebouw en de parking onderbroken. 
Het ziet er wel weer zo uit als je denk ik hebt bedoeld.

MVG,
Eggie
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:26:06+00:00): Please provide proper changeset description for your edit.
PerplexingPenguins (2020-07-03 16:01:34+00:00): It looks like that building is the bank? If so, these points can be merged by selecting both and pressing C
ericpremraju (2020-07-05 08:28:40+00:00): Please provide proper changeset description for the edits
will_p (2020-07-03 21:36:16+00:00): Some of the changes made here look incorrect.

In the following three examples, you have changed cricket pitches located inside parks or recreation grounds to leisure=recreation_ground. This results in recreation grounds inside recreation grounds. Surely the common sense way to tag a single pitch inside a recreation ground is leisure=pitch? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257476065
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29371977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31288883

Additionally, I don't agree that a BMX track inside a park is a recreation ground. Pitch seems a better choice.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328564494