piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2022-03-03 17:14:19+00:00): The driveway that leads to 9348 looks like it's paralell to the driveway that leads to 9342. Could you review and correct if needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118030068
SLMapper (2022-04-21 21:30:49+00:00): Hallo Manuel, hier hast du dich wohl vertan. Die Einbahnstraße ist genau gegensätzlich mit einem anderen Teilstück der Straße Mädlesbrück eingetragen.
Daher "warnings:impossible_oneway:highway 	2".
Kannst du das korrigieren?
Ist die Einbahnstraße dort neu? Vor kurzem gab es dort keine. 
Am Bahnübergang bezweifle ich eine Einbahnstraße, der ist zweispurig gebaut.
SLMapper (2022-04-21 21:31:49+00:00): Teilstück der Wilhelmstraße meinte ich
SLMapper (2022-04-28 14:06:03+00:00): Nach survey korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120308174
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887472.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887451.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887427.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887417.
user_5359 (2022-03-05 18:56:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168453030 (as example). What is the meaning of the tag Jana = Kilińskiego? Copy & Paste error?
Dawid2849 (2022-03-06 10:52:19+00:00): Hello. Yes, it's copy-paste error. Thanks for finding this. I hope that I removed all of it.
szydzio (2022-05-26 09:30:23+00:00): Hej! Wgrywając dane z zewnętrznych baz zwracaj proszę uwagę na istniejące już dane. Jedna z aptek wgrałeś na ul. Tczewską z adresem z 14 lutego. Poza tym zwróć proszę uwagę na WIELKIE LITERY w adresach - nie stosujemy ich w OSM, zaś addr:street dopasowujemy do nazw ulic istniejących już w bazie, nie piszemy np. "ul. 1 Maja" tylko "1 Maja". Pozdr!
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887385.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887360.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887347.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-02 23:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eBin (2022-08-19 20:15:21+00:00): Hej, co oznacza skrót KS Sośnica? Nie ma tego w wykazie podstacji trakcyjnych PKP
tomzyl (2022-08-19 20:17:26+00:00): Kabina sekcyjna. To jest oddzielne zestawienie, ale również dostępne, tak jak podstacje.
eBin (2022-08-19 21:00:19+00:00): Dzięki
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 22:13:39+00:00): Please don't tag random areas as parks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118031679
FlowerHillPerson (2022-03-10 15:31:36+00:00): I apologize for not responding sooner. Many of those areas (such as in Flower Hill) are officially designated as parks. When I started editing, I tagged many as parks instead of grass areas and I am in the process of changing them.
RicoElectrico (2022-03-03 09:04:15+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem trochę tę edycję. Plac zabaw to plac zabaw, a nie park ;) skasowałem też nazwę zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887334.
RicoElectrico (2022-03-03 09:08:24+00:00): Cześć, nie o tego blacharza chodziło. To nieporozumienie wynikające z tłumaczenia w edytorze :D

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/791017914525679616/948868793805991966/unknown.png - kliknij na "i" i przeczytaj dokumentację pod linkiem.

Wybierz zamiast tego "warsztat samochodowy".

PS: Nie musisz każdego lokalu wysyłać osobno, wystarczy że podobne zmiany na bliskim obszarze wyślesz razem. To też ułatwi innym ich przeglądanie.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887273.
pio2_122 (2022-03-02 21:54:04+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że praktycznie wszystkie punkty informacyjne były już dodane do OSM.
Teraz zostały one zdublowane, np. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5485579532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9550482994
gogeo (2022-03-02 21:58:09+00:00): Ok możesz wycować moją zmianę?
pio2_122 (2022-03-02 22:04:37+00:00): Wycofane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118035466
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:16:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887241.
Dodko (2022-03-06 19:35:38+00:00): Názvy zastávok netrebalo meniť, boli napísané presne ako ich eviduje Eurobus a v takom skrátenom tvare sú aj v cestovných poriadkoch.
t_ja (2022-03-06 19:56:44+00:00): Názvy sa majú uvádzať v neskrátenej forme. To, že si to prevádzkovateľ skracuje tak, aby sa to vošlo do jeho tlačených cestovných poriadkov je irelevantné. Ak je to potrebné, môže sa zaznačiť to "interné" pomenovanie ako "alt_name", prípadne "official_name" alebo "short_name". Keď idem autobusom, pýtam si lístok na "rázcestie" alebo "k železničnej stanici" a nie k "rázc." alebo "žel.st." :)
Dodko (2022-03-06 20:14:18+00:00): Treba pozrieť čo je napísané na tabuli, ale skrátené názvy sú aj v cestovných poriadkoch pri vyhľadávaní spojenia.
https://paste.pics/GA4IV

Podľa tých názvov som aj aktualizoval a pridával zastávky podľa zoznamu čo poslali.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/xxZ5DAAtviE/m/djbRlJ4NAgAJ
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:14:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887178.
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-02 20:59:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9007994453
Knopen 2923193586, 9007994453, 9007994454 en 2923193584 liggen nu bijna in een rechte lijn. Dit kan beschouwd worden als "overnoded" (te veel / onnodige knopen). Als je dit stuk recht vindt, kun je knopen wellicht beter verwijderen. Als er een zichtbare kromming is kan je dit beter aanpassen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_curves_with_an_appropriate_number_of_nodes

Dat je het maar weet; dit is niet zo erg. :-)
user_5359 (2022-03-05 18:58:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/403971503 . Did you mean ref:nrhp instead of key:nrhp?
osmhonehone (2022-03-05 19:56:45+00:00): Yes, thanks!
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887173.
VA00 (2022-09-25 10:05:04+00:00): Naprawdę zjazd ma taką nazwę? Ostatnio zgłupiałem jak nawigacja kazała mi tam skręcić.
Yunkers (2022-09-26 19:38:23+00:00): Tak ma. To oficjalna nazwa. Ale są dodane destination to nie powinno robić specjalnie dużego znaczenia w nawigacji
Robert Whittaker (2022-07-29 10:43:09+00:00): The postcode of "PL31 1LZ" that you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418919314 in this changeset is not correct for this location.

I wonder if the school that this is tagged as is actually still using this site. I don't suppose you can shed any light on this can you?
Tim457 (2022-07-29 12:10:30+00:00): Sorry about that. I took the details from Edubase, which lists an institution with this name and URN operating at the postcode I gave; either the URN is wrong or (more likely) the school operates two sites. Beyond that I don't know anything definite.

There are no other schools by this name or similar on Edubase, and there's no indication I can find that this school operates more than one site.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:58:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886946.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-04 07:58:28+00:00): Hi there. I'm commenting on behalf of the OSM Discord Oceania team, we wanted to question why you're removing otherwise correct emergency access tags on roads (i.e. emergency=yes+access=no). This is listed as correct usage on the wiki. Would you mind explaining? Thanks.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886841.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:50:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886799.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886781.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-09 18:09:17+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
J'ai raccordé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036655961 à https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085149797 pour assurer la jonction.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
TheBestIdea (2022-08-03 18:34:32+00:00): Hi David,

I have questions about the oneway:bicycle=no and cycleway:left:lane=advisory tags you added on Himrod. I've biked on Himrod a bunch. It is definitely oneway for bikes, and it's an exclusive bike lane. (I don't think there are any advisory bike lanes in NYC at least how the definition is used by that tag.) I'm going to update the tags, but lmk if you have any questions or think I'm off base.

Happy mapping,

Brandon
bus-mt (2022-06-05 18:51:19+00:00): Hallo JuanCarlos,
Deine Änderungen der smoothness am Birkendamm passen nicht zur Definition im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness). Die zu schlechte Einstufung hat zur Folge, dass einige Radrouter die eigentlich gut fahrbare Strecke meiden und über benachbarte vielbefahrene Straßen routen.
Die smoothness-Abstufungen sollen - wie vieles in OSM -  weltweit für jegliche Fahrzeuge nutzbar sein und sind dementsprechend grob. intermediate und schlechter findet man in unserer Region daher abseits von Feld- und Waldwegen eher selten.
Grüße aus dem Kalletal
Matthias
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886719.
user_5359 (2022-03-03 05:54:51+00:00): Welchem to OSM! Please notice your typo. Use building=hut instead buiilding=hut. I have corrected the existing typos.
maro21 (2022-03-09 20:56:44+00:00): - Jak coś jest we Wrocławiu, to nie ma potrzeby dodawania do nazwy "we Wrocławiu"
- Jak adres jest na budynku, to nie dajemy na obszarze.
- Jak dajemy nazwę w innym języku, to trzeba dodać "name:pl" z tą samą nazwą co w name.
- Skrót od "doktora" to "dr.".
ptarac (2022-03-09 21:15:35+00:00): Ad. 1. Jak coś jest we Wrocławiu, a ma w nazwie własnej "we Wrocławiu" to musi mieć to w nazwie. RCKiK jest w Polsce kilkanaście i siedziba jest różnicująca. RCKiK we Wrocławiu, w Katowicach etc. Tym bardziej jak RCKiK są wyświetlane w szerszym kontekście np. całego kraju. Tak jest w tym przypadku. Odsyłam na https://dopomoha.pl/pl/#map=6/52.559/20.2. Nazwa tego RCKIK brzmi   Regionalne Centrum Krwiodawstwa i Krwiolecznictwa we Wrocławiu im. prof. dr. hab. Tadeusza Dorobisza. Tu się z Kolegą nie zgodzę. Proszę to skorygować :).
Ad. 2. Zgoda.
Ad. 3. Nie wiem. Dopytam u innych.
Ad. 4. Tak wiem. Niestety było kopiuj&wklej ze strony RCKiK, a tam jest z błędem. Nie zauważyłem. Pośpiech przy wprowadzaniu i weryfikacji wszystkich RCKiK w Pl.
BCNorwich (2022-03-04 18:30:24+00:00): Hi, The house numbers are not the house names, fiction removed again. Please desist in adding incorrect data to OSM.

Regards Bernard.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-10 16:52:35+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
J'ai remis en sens unique les rues que tu avais repassées en double sens dans le centre ancien de Caen. Pour information ces rues sont bien décrites pour être cyclables dans les deux sens. N’hésite pas si tu as des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-08-11 06:20:21+00:00): Bonjour Charles,

Merci beaucoup de rectifier ce que j'ai pu mal modifier j'essaie d'apprendre, de comprendre et de faire de mon mieux, je jetterais un coup d'œil plus approfondie à toutes les modifications que vous avez apportées pour comprendre mes erreurs dans les prochaines jours.

Merci beaucoup à bientôt Nzau.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-11 11:10:26+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
Merci pour ton retour. Il faut effectivement bien le prendre :) c'est bienveillant. N’hésite pas si tu as des questions et si tu penses que je me suis planté, dis-le-moi ; même avec beaucoup d'expérience, on fait des erreurs.

À bientôt.

Charles
Cucazer (2022-03-03 14:20:21+00:00): Better use highway=service for access roads to facilities even if they are unpaved, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track for more details
Dawid2849 (2022-03-02 21:59:11+00:00): Brzozowica*

Raz zrobiłem literówkę i później skopiowałem nie patrząc co napisałem :P
bxl-forever (2022-03-03 14:26:47+00:00): Hello,

Some time ago, the Brussels Region released a map where this street had maxspeed=50.  Upon surveying a few month ago, we found out their map was wrong, as there were still 70-kph road signs on this tunnel.

If they finally changed the road signs, that is good news.  I suppose your change was based on a survey, right?
Badkarmat (2022-03-04 18:45:17+00:00): Hello,
I went through the tunnel a few days ago and took a note saying the speed limit on my GPS / OSM was wrong there. Now you put me at a doubt. As I didn't recorded any images, I'm gonna check that carefully on my next trip there.
Badkarmat (2022-03-30 20:13:54+00:00): My bad. They're still 70 signs in the tunnel. I reverted the speed limit according to that.
BCNorwich (2022-03-04 07:52:31+00:00): I've removed the highway section you placed on top of an existing highway as it's duplication.

Regards Bernard.
PBRipley (2022-03-04 08:23:34+00:00): Hi Bernard,

I placed that there as a holder for a group of properties that use that street name in the address. 

Without it an error is generated as there is a property with a street name that doesn't exist.

I inserted a small piece of highway that sat beneath the existing street, it wasnt visible on the map however you were able to navigate to the location using directions. With it present it also removed the street name errors.

I thought it made more sense to be present as it is totally invisible, helps with navigation and removes the errors

Paul
BCNorwich (2022-03-04 09:13:12+00:00): Hi, Royal Mail postcode finder and derbyshire.gov.uk, give the addresses as:-
(Numbers 1 to 8) Jessop Lodge
Jessop Street
Codnor
Ripley
DE5 9SW 

So it seems that Jessop Lodge does not exist as a street, rather the four buildings comprising Jessop Lodge are situated on Jessop Street.  

Your small piece of highway was visible and was joined to and on the same line as the existing highway, making for duplication. 

I don't know if there is a correct answer but it shouldn't be duplication of a highway. I would think a change to the building addresses of the small residential area would be better. 

Regards Bernard.
PBRipley (2022-03-04 10:03:45+00:00): Thanks Bernard, that makes sense for most of the addresses. Its almost as if OSM could do with another address field making it possible to refer to the secondary street name. In some cases doing it the way you suggest it leads to duplicate house numbers on the same street, it will certainly make a lot of conflicts with the numbering.

Out of interest where could you see my added highways were visible? I did some experimentation and they were always hid away beneath the larger existing street. I tried on numerous devices and they were not visible in any way other than within an editor.
BCNorwich (2022-03-04 10:43:43+00:00): Hi, the duplicate edges are reported on OSM Inspector Routing layer:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.38640&lat=53.04646&zoom=14
Two are still there, they will disappear after today.

My thinking is that Jessop Lodge is a place/locality name but some folk disagree with this. It's actually the whole building block that has the name Jessop Lodge and the numbers are of the flats/apartments of the block.
PBRipley (2022-03-04 11:28:06+00:00): It seems to me a little counter intuitive that for the sake of getting rid of the conflicts on the OSM inspector we prefer to forgo the functionality of being able to route to the location on the map, and in turn make 10 fold the number of conflicts due to the house numbering issue.

You couldn't see it on the map and I believe it was a useful work a around which would benefit end users of OSM
BCNorwich (2022-03-04 07:50:00+00:00): Hi, Can you say why you placed The Walkway, a service highway, on top of Grosvenor Road making a duplicate highway section? 

You've done similar duplications recently. I've now removed several sections of highway atop of highway.

Regards Bernard.
PBRipley (2022-03-04 08:46:34+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I placed that there as a holder for a group of properties that use that street name in the address.
Without it an error is generated as there is a property with a street name that doesn't exist.
I inserted a small piece of highway that sat beneath the existing street, it wasnt visible on the map however you were able to navigate to the location using directions. With it present it also removed the street name errors.
I thought it made more sense to be present as it is totally invisible, helps with navigation and removes the errors
Paul
user_5359 (2022-03-06 15:45:05+00:00): Hello! Please use addr:street:en instead of address:street:en.
Pegasus21 (2022-03-10 15:36:28+00:00): Hi, thank you for bringing this to my attention! Pegasus21
praeteritum (2022-06-27 03:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122886660.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
Carto'Cité (2022-08-09 15:33:30+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
J'ai supprimé cette piste que tu avais ajoutée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036669190) car elle est en doublon avec ce chemin piéton (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/659095763) qui est également considéré comme une piste du fait du bicycle=designated + segregated=yes. N’hésite pas si tu as des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
CENTSOARER (2022-03-09 18:42:51+00:00): Por favor revierta sus cambios hechos con base en INEGI para toda el área de Ciudad Valles, San Luis Potosí, no sólo este conjunto. Esos datos no están correctos y o actualizados en muchos de los casos, sobre todo en los andadores. No han sido exhaustivas mis aportaciones, pero evidentemente (si revisa mis trazas GPS) he estado ahí, en sus calles.
PlinyTheYoungest (2022-03-09 21:42:01+00:00): I appreciate you reaching out. I am working to improve the data in OSM by adding missing geometry and adding names verified through the INEGI on the ground project. I see your traces, but they are south of where I have been editing and match what is current. Unfortunately, there is not ground imagery available, but I utilize all satellite imageries as well as Strava to verify my work.

Le agradezco que se comunique. Estoy trabajando para mejorar los datos en OSM agregando geometría faltante y agregando nombres verificados a través del proyecto INEGI en el terreno. Veo sus rastros, pero están al sur de donde he estado editando y coinciden con lo que es actual. Desafortunadamente, no hay imágenes terrestres disponibles, pero utilizo todas las imágenes satelitales, así como Strava, para verificar mi trabajo.
Warin61 (2022-03-03 22:23:48+00:00): Hi,
This changeset has damaged the multipolygon relation for the Gungahlin Lakes Golf Club. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.11261&lat=-35.18544&zoom=15

Note: The Gungahlin Pond is not all a golf hazard...
Warin61 (2022-03-03 23:29:32+00:00): Reverted in full. Only changes the course and lake back to correct relations.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:47:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122881155.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122881064.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
Nakaner (2022-03-04 15:21:34+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem und anderen Änderungssätze hast du smoothness=* an der St 2404 erfasst. Ein anderer Mapper hatte dort neulich schon per mechanischem Edit surface=asphalt ergänzt. Leider verstieß dessen mechanischer Edit gegen die dafür geltenden Regeln – er war nicht mit der Community vorher abgesprochen worden und hatte Mängel (Beton-Autobahnen ohne surface=* als surface=asphalt getaggt). Deshalb habe ich diesen soeben revertiert.

Falls du an der St 2404 ortskundig bist, möchte ich dich bitten, surface=asphalt zu ergänzen, falls es dort richtig ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
GOwin (2022-03-03 01:26:32+00:00): Hello! Maraming salamat sa'yong ambag na datos sa mapa. Maari ka pang magdagdag ng mga kapakipakinabang na impormasyong (e.g. business hours, street names, place names), para lalo pang mapag-buti ang mapa.

Kung nais mo pa ng karagdagang kaalaman,tingnan ang: https://osm.org/​wiki/​Beginners'_guide o subukan ang mga aralin sa https://learnosm.org. 

Mayroón ring  mga online channels ang mga boluntaryong lokal sa OSM : https://osm.org/wiki/PH
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118250223 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
praeteritum (2022-06-26 20:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122880867.
ottwiz (2022-03-06 10:36:31+00:00): You just made a rupture in the route nr. 7 relation, which I have to fix
jcr83 (2022-03-03 17:23:09+00:00): Bonjour
Pouvez-vous préciser pourquoi ce bâtiment est historique ?
CheshireCat07 (2022-03-03 19:37:03+00:00): Villa Simone achetée par la mairie et convertie en parc
La définir comme parc municipal serait plus exacte, mais je n'ai pas trouvé