piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wkdgs (2021-09-08 12:04:11+00:00): Hallo,

zunächst einmal willkommen bei OSM und danke, dass du mithilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Bei deinen Änderungen sind mir ein paar Probleme aufgefallen:

Der Tag "leisure=park" ist für öffentliche Parks gedacht. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark) Für private Gärten gibt es den Tag "leisure=garden" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden) und den Tag "access=private". Private Gärten werden aber üblicherweise nicht gemappt, wenn sie keine besondere Bedeutung haben.

Der "name"-Tag ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht. Für Zugansbeschränkungen sollte der "access"-Tag verwendet werden, für kurze Beschreibungen, die nicht durch Tags ausgedrückt werden können ist der Tag "description" gedacht.

Und zuletzt sollten die "opening_hours"-Tags ein bestimmtes Format erfüllen. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours).

Ich hab den Garten daher erstmal komplett entfernt. Wenn du ihn trotzdem gerne mappen möchtest, füge ihn ruhig wieder mit den passenden Tags hinzu.

LG
winkeldings
RicoElectrico (2021-09-07 09:29:30+00:00): Chyba Twoja uwaga? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2839822

Jak sprawa rozwiązana, to zamknij :)
Selerus (2021-09-07 09:50:41+00:00): Zamknąłem
TG-map4 (2021-09-08 05:14:39+00:00): Hi, Google Maps is not allowed and forbidden for OpenStreetMap. Don't use that source. "Tim Online" (NRW-Atlas) is allowed because of the free license. Only use allowed sources.
Please pay attention to rename all segments. You missed the one at the beginning. Also, if you rename a road, you have to change the name on ALL addresses (houses) belonging to this street. Because this is a rural area, you only have to change 6 addresses (numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8). Can you do that?
Kovoschiz (2021-09-07 13:49:10+00:00): What happened to https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/109340726 ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Tesla (2021-09-07 18:07:24+00:00): Здание блок-поста возле Каневской ГЕС разобрали, поэтому я его удалил в своё время.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Heinz_V (2021-09-27 12:56:23+00:00): Please stop to use name=unkown and name=lake for a lake. This is clearly against the rules of OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-09-20 03:10:30+00:00): شكرا
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-09 00:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115928159 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Sanniu (2021-09-14 10:37:02+00:00): Hi

All these buildings already have an address with building polygon.
Why your add duplicated address as node?
MichaelRock (2021-09-15 10:27:10+00:00): I didn't saw that changes took effect after update. I removed duplicates now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
022 (2025-11-26 04:22:45+00:00): Hi there I know this is 4 years old but I was working in the area and just wanted to just leave a comment here to point out my disagreement with the naming decision on this changeset. 

While I agree in principle with the concept of alining road names to their posted street signs, (and the wiki corroborates this method) there are a few significant issues here.

Firstly, despite street signs being displayed as "Township ## Road #" this is not the name of the road as it appears on a Civic address. The Civic address will always Read "Township Road ###" and the address placards issued by the County and located on the road themselves adhere to this format instead. My perspective is that the format of the civic address carries more weight than the format of the street signage. 

Secondly, every township and range road is already using the naming format of "Township Road ###" (as per the original Geobase import) and the task of converting these across the entire County would not only be monumental, but risk creating inconsistencies and errors. 

I decided to revert the naming on Highway 873 because although it is signed as "RGE 14 RD 4" in some spots, it is also signed as "SH 873" / "HWY 873" (more inconsistencies with signage) so I have renamed it to "Highway 873" for the sake of simplicity and added "Range Road 144" under the 'Alt_name' tag. 

I'm partly writing this to spell out my own rationale as I had also contemplated changing these street names, but after some reflection I don't think it's the best idea.
zorglubu (2021-09-07 11:12:05+00:00): Hello,

You added a tag motorcar=yes to a street with an access forbidden for motorcars, except for "destination". What is your source of information ? I presume that it is not "Maxar Imagery" as noted in the changeset ?

Thank you, #Bolt, to answer the question, this is not the first time I notice such a tag modification.
Bolt010 (2021-09-08 06:46:51+00:00): Hello zorglubu,

Thanks for correcting, going forward will ensure such tags are not given to the ways with destination tags.
Herrieman (2021-09-07 10:29:10+00:00): Het kan verandert zijn ondertussen, maar volgens mij loopt 66-93 via de Laan van de Helende Meesters en dan langs de Beneluxbaan. Dus niet eerst langs de Groenelaan en via de Sportlaan naar de Beneluxbaan.
Kan dat kloppen?
dvdhoven (2021-09-07 11:13:27+00:00): Ik had alleen de route gerepareerd.
Ik heb nu even op routedatabank gekeken en inderdaad via de Laan van de Helende Meesters.
Route is nu aangepast.

Bedankt voor het attentieseintje :-)

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Warin61 (2022-08-17 04:03:09+00:00): Bullfighting... ??? I don't believe it. At what looks like a residential address...
Pakenhamin (2022-08-17 11:22:01+00:00): You're going to have to help me find it.
Warin61 (2022-08-18 07:41:13+00:00): I have removed the bull (pun)  ... they were on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9069893661/history

and

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9109512061/history

Not certain why they were there ... vicious large dog? Or maybe I have it wrong.. but if you do remember I'd be interested..
Pakenhamin (2022-08-25 13:28:10+00:00): It was most likely fumble fingers on the phone accidentally selecting that option by mistake.  Good catch.
Warin61 (2022-08-26 07:05:20+00:00): Yep, that will do it.  Some of my changeset comments are one letter .. just my fumbling.
tonyf1 (2021-10-20 10:06:03+00:00): reverted  Changeset #112736213
tonyf1 (2021-10-20 10:12:27+00:00): and unrevertedtags 112736395
maraf24 (2021-09-07 10:44:35+00:00): Wyburzone budynki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980504598
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980504272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980504866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366041390
Cristoffs (2021-09-07 12:40:04+00:00): Poprawisz? Jak już znalazłeś było by miło w Bdoot były.
maraf24 (2021-09-07 19:39:41+00:00): Dlatego BDOT należy weryfikować.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
mueschel (2021-09-13 10:14:37+00:00): Hi,
the zoo got a strange tag 
"operator:companieshouse = 10238727"

Could you check that?
CjMalone (2021-09-13 17:05:33+00:00): It was by design, I feel like I've used it before too.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10238727
mueschel (2021-09-13 17:20:37+00:00): According to Taginfo this is the very first time the key appeared in OSM.

I found 
1x ref:companies_house and
2x operator:companies_house
CjMalone (2021-09-13 19:06:02+00:00): Changed to operator:companies_house in #111161334
maraf24 (2021-09-07 10:41:18+00:00): Kolega znowu importuje nieistniejące budynki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.61398/23.46811
Cristoffs (2021-09-07 12:40:21+00:00): Poprawisz? Jak już znalazłeś było by miło w Bdoot były.
maraf24 (2021-09-07 19:40:08+00:00): Nie poprawiam, by nie dawać niewłaściwego przykładu :)
streckenkundler (2021-09-07 10:40:20+00:00): Hei,

kannst du sagen wie lange? 

Ist das wegen Bauarbeiten?

Danke.

Sven
derlausitzer (2021-09-08 13:05:06+00:00): Wie lange weiß ich nicht, es sind Bauarbeiten im Gange. Das Wehr ist unpassierbar abgesperrt, selbst für Fußgänger. Wenn es wieder offen ist, nehme ich die Sperrung raus- fahre öfter da lang. 
Übrigens ist das große Wehr nach den Bauarbeiten nach Osten versetzt worden. Könnte mal korrigiert werden.
MfG
derlausitzer (2021-09-08 13:06:17+00:00): gemeint: Wehr VI.
streckenkundler (2021-09-08 17:08:56+00:00): Hei,

Vielen Dank... Dann wird das eine Weile dauern...

Ich setze mal beim highway=path über das Wehr auch die construction-Tags. das ist bei sowas sauberer und man kann das per overpass besser verfolgen.

Wehr VI: 

Danke für den Stand dazu.
Beim Brandenburg-Viewer sieht man noch den Bau, man kann aber schon erahnen, wie es wird...
https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?projection=EPSG:25833&center=445577.01500388974,5743791.563920783&zoom=14&bglayer=4&layers=25

Das Luftbild dahinter  kann und darf für OSM genutzt werden. Vergleiche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Wie man die entsprechenden WMS-Dienste aber bei iD einbindet, muß du schauen. Ich kenne iD nicht....


Viele Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2021-09-08 17:13:18+00:00): Ich hab erst mal nur das construction gesetzt... Wehr VI bearbeite ich extra. Da will ich mit erst mal in Ruhe das Luftbild anschauen... Da kommt ja nun auch ein Fischpass hinzu.

Sven
derlausitzer (2021-09-09 12:07:15+00:00): Ja, da passiert erst mal nichts. Das Wehr VI ist ja fertig und passierbar, wackelt vielleicht nur das Navi ein bißchen.
Wichtig ist wirklich die Sperrung Wehr VII, denn wer aus Guhrow kommt, kann den gesamten Weg wieder zurückfahren.
mike140 (2021-09-07 10:39:11+00:00): О каком направлении идёт речь?
Борис Сергеевич (2021-09-07 11:37:33+00:00): Нумерация всех улиц, в том числе и Тихвинской начинается от ул. Новосибирской. И трек ближе и по лучшей дороге должен идти по Новосибирской. (Ломоносова 210 - Тихвинская 34). Трек прокладывает по более дальнему маршруту.
mike140 (2021-09-07 13:01:37+00:00): При чем нумерация домов к построению маршрута? А дома там даже не нарисованы. За маршрутизацию на этом сайте отвечают два сервиса OSRM и GraphHopper - так что все претензии к ним. В мобильном навигаторе может быть другой сервис и строить будет по-другому
Борис Сергеевич (2021-09-07 14:01:30+00:00): Скажите, куда можно отправить скрины? Возможно так я смогу более доступно донести суть проблемы.
mike140 (2021-09-07 15:20:47+00:00): Есть OSM-чат в телеграмм http://t.me/osmUA - можно туда
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
TrickyFoxy (2021-09-23 14:37:58+00:00): Ничего тут не снесли. Парковка есть, машины стоят) Возвращаю
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110848763
hackthemap (2021-10-22 23:36:07+00:00): Hi Radler_Ffm :)

Danke für deine Anpassungen!
Hier sollte wahrscheinlich eher das hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dagricultural verwenden werden statt dem access=no und dem motor_vehicle tag.
Kannst du vielleicht noch das motor_vehicle entfernen und den access tag anpassen?

Viele Grüße
hackthemap :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-11-19 21:27:02+00:00): Na orto widać budynki w budowie, a nie gotowe.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Emmanuel Arrechea (2022-04-28 08:43:46+00:00): J'ai découvert ces immeubles en allant au bureau de vote 24. Du coup c'était plus facile de les cartographier à partir du cadastre qui était à jour. Je n'ai pas importé les données, j'ai préférer modifier les tracés.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:08:17+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:08:27+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Pierce (2022-04-28 10:02:30+00:00): As per "Future Spirit of Tasmania terminal" name, please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
aachso (2021-09-08 10:55:08+00:00): Hallo kluckmedia und willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte mach dich im OSM-Wiki mit der Verwendung der Tags vertraut. Die description sollte nicht für Werbetexte o.ä. verwendet werden. Du hast die Nummer 16 als Mehrfamilienhaus getaggt, das Gebäude steht aber im Industriegebiet und ist wohl eher eine Lagerhalle?

Bitte korrigiere deine Änderungen noch, danke!
kluckmedia (2021-09-08 11:02:16+00:00): Vielen Dank für die schnelle Info.

Das mit dem Icon war uns so nicht bekannt. Das Gebäude ist zwar eine Halle. Wir sitzen aber im vorgelagerten modernen Büro-Glasbau. Was würdet ihr vorschlagen?
aachso (2021-09-08 11:16:06+00:00): Hi, ich weiß leider nicht, was genau du mit Icon meinst.

Aber ihr sitzt doch in der 14 oder? Du hast nämlich die 16 geändert. Am einfachsten lässt du das Gebäude einfach als building=yes.

Das Büro selbst mappst du am besten auch nicht als Node auf dem Gebäudeumriss, sondern als freistehende Node dort, wo etwa die Mitte des Büros ist. Da sollte dann auch office=advertising_agency als Tag hinzugefügt werden.
kluckmedia (2021-09-08 11:44:02+00:00): So passt es jetzt für uns. Änderungen haben wir gemacht. Hausnummer stand bei uns aber auf 14 und nicht 16 ;-)
aachso (2021-09-08 14:57:37+00:00): Du hast in deinem ersten Edit das Gebäude mit der Hausnummer 16 bearbeitet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509422392/history
Bitte mach das rückgängig und ändere building=apartments wieder in building=yes.

In deinem letzten Edit hast du die Werbeagentur auf die gesamte Gebäudefläche der Hausnummer 14 übertragen. Das ist nur richtig, wenn ihr das gesamte Gebäude einnehmt.

Du hast jetzt auch noch irgendwie Tags in die description eingefügt, statt die Tags dem Objekt hinzuzufügen, das ist natürlich falsch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509422393

Ich schlage vor, dass du beide deiner Änderungen wieder rückgängig machst, also alle ursprünglichen Tags wiederherstellst und dann innerhalb der Gebäudefläche von Gebäude 14 eine neue Node für euer Büro erstellst, die keine description und dafür den Tag office=advertising_agency enthält.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:40:17+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111027675
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-09 00:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115928159 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
A67-A67 (2021-09-08 10:40:22+00:00): Ik neem aan dat dit schuurtjes zijn i.p.v. huizen. De correcte tag is dan building=shed i.p.v. building=house.

Daarnaast is de construction-tag niet meer nodig op de voltooide gebouwen.
leandert (2021-09-08 11:15:52+00:00): Dit zijn schuurtjes inderdaad, ik pas het aan. Dank voor de feedback.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:40:44+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110857807
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
sorcrosc (2021-09-07 19:46:57+00:00): Ciao. Vorrei sapere dove ai preso l'altezza massima del sottopassaggio. Devi indicare la tua fonte nel changeset.

Grazie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.