piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2021-11-08 23:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2021-11-08 19:41:08+00:00): зачем тег name c остановок убирать? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3361594084/history#map=19/55.76191/37.41602

верну
Linda89 (2021-11-08 20:33:59+00:00): странно... я вроде только сменил Name -> name:ru
если удалил совсем, значит попутал, сори
literan (2021-11-08 20:59:19+00:00): да именно это вы и сделали, т.е. удалили тег name.

не надо так делать, пожалуйста. name:ru если хотите заполняйте, только name не трогайте (именно он применяется во всех рендерах)
mariotomo (2021-11-11 01:24:35+00:00): hola! conoces la extensión de este "botanical gardens"? en forma de inspiración, revisa como está mapeado el "Tanager Botanical Garden" en la zona de Mariato. (aunque quizás debería ser leisure=garden, tendré que revisarlo también.)
adrumillon (2021-11-14 23:14:44+00:00): It’s a botanical garden that can be visited with an entrance fee to see different kinds of animals, birds and plants. It is marked as it on Google Maps as Finca Los Monos.
mariotomo (2021-11-14 23:18:50+00:00): I think I did attempt to contact them some time ago. we can't copy from the copyrighted Google Maps, so I generally don't even review it for comparison.  if you were in the area, you could ask them to provide you with a map of their premises, and ask for permission to copy.  or you could walk their paths and map them yourself.  as I did at the Tanager.
adrumillon (2021-11-14 23:22:52+00:00): I understand. I will try to do that then!
canfe (2022-01-13 10:05:47+00:00): Il passaggio vicino al bar va segnato come way. Suppongo si apedonale.
praeteritum (2023-06-23 06:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137672389.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:33:33+00:00): Hello!

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4106740760/history
Carnildo (2023-03-22 22:20:03+00:00): It's a storefront for TDS Telecom: https://tdstelecom.com

Yes, you can sign up for internet service there, but you can also purchase hardware such as modems.
praeteritum (2023-06-22 12:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137645196.
praeteritum (2023-06-21 06:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137588337.
andrepoiy (2021-11-23 03:58:19+00:00): Hello! What is your reasoning for downgrading Niagara Scenic Parkway from motorway to primary? That is a significant downgrade and to my knowledge, the section that you downgraded is indeed up to motorway standards (grade separation, separate carriageways, etc.)
Adam Franco (2021-11-23 14:18:50+00:00): Hi andrepoly, thanks for asking! The short answer is that the New York DOT gives the northern part of the Niagra Scenic Parkway an Arterial Classification Code (ACC) of 3, which has been determined by other mappers in New York to correspond to `highway=primary`. Even though this road is of a grade-separated construction it has a low speed limit and doesn't serve as a connection to large regional cities like most of the motorway network.

Here is info on the update US Highway classification guidance: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
and here are the New York-specific guidelines developed and discussed by other New York-based mappers which draw on the DOT's ACC classification for top-level highway classification.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification

I've gotten a lot of feedback on this project by mappers in the OSMUS Slack's #local-newyorkstate channel: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CJ4QKU40H/p1636421497086700

As I worked through reclassify the top-levels of highways in upstate New York I've been compiling a list exceptions, and places where the ACC values given by the DOT don't necessarily make sense to me:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_York/Highway_Classification/2021_Classification_Project
A portion of the Niagra Scenic Parkway south of I-190 and the Rainbow bridge has an ACC=2 which would likely make it `highway=trunk`+`expressway=yes`, but it then seems to peter out into a network of ACC=4/5 city streets at its southern end rather than obviously serving a top-level connection in the road network. It you have local knowledge of this roadway, feedback would be very welcome!
Adam Franco (2021-11-23 14:45:04+00:00): An additional note that I just remembered: in the New York-specific guidance, the Niagra Scenic Parkway (957A) is specifically called out as a candidate for highway=primary+expressway=yes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification#3._highway.3Dprimary
rskedgell (2021-11-09 07:01:13+00:00): After sharing Here East's tweet, I found an LB Hackney announcement about Gainsborough Bridge, which states that it "opened to pedestrians and cyclists", so I think changing it to highway=cycleway seems justified.

https://news.hackney.gov.uk/council-and-lldc-drive-sustainable-transport-improvements-in-hackney-wick/
MacLondon (2021-11-09 12:56:00+00:00): Agree. I've changed this to a cycleway now. I didn't notice any dropped kerb on the QEOP side to merit tagging as a cycleway at that end though.

There is some work going on at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850658623 which is currently closed. Possibly the steps there are being converted to a ramp, but I didn't survey the work.
mytrails92 (2021-11-08 19:21:24+00:00): adding 1 peak
praeteritum (2023-06-20 06:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137545086.
G_P_J (2021-11-18 10:03:35+00:00): Cześć, 
ta zmiana wygenerowała kolejne duplikaty bez usuwania poprzednich. Przykład: adres Grudziądz, Kujawska 78A
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9236195793/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9195638559/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9195661432/history
Trzy takie same punkty adresowe w tym samym miejscu.
Pełną listę duplikatów wygenerowanych przez Ciebie i nadal istniejących znajdziesz tu: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/geolife?level=1 Jeśli nie wiesz jak to poprawić, to daj znać. Postaram się pomóc. 
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
Peer P King (2021-11-08 19:28:14+00:00): Die URL wurde abgeschnitten:

https://www.bonn.de/medien-global/amt-13/amtsblatt/58_2021_Amtsblatt.pdf
user_5359 (2021-11-09 10:46:46+00:00): Willlkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Einpflege der Umbenennung. Es wäre schön wenn der alte Name noch unter old_name weiterbestehen könnte.
redd (2021-11-12 23:23:08+00:00): Ich weiss leider nicht warum dieser Changeset als so gross angezeigt wird, ich habe lediglich ein paar Gebaude in Knetzgau / Sand hinzugefuegt
Fischkopp0815 (2021-11-13 05:10:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291800441

Du hast im Bereich der Gebäude 2 Stützpunkte dieser Grenzlinie angefasst und die reicht soweit. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9236205132

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2953076102
pio2_122 (2021-11-08 20:46:22+00:00): Dlaczego do budynków uczelni i Centrum Psychiatrycznego przy ul. Żołnierskiej dodałeś tag  access=private?
np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58359967
DeFra85 (2021-11-09 14:27:18+00:00): Why every part of the church have to have THE name? Get a bit crowdy on the map.
sebastianha (2021-11-09 15:45:14+00:00): Sorry, messed this up while using Street Complete app. Thanks for correcting it!
aceman444 (2023-07-14 21:01:24+00:00): Zdravim, vidim, ze ste popridavali par pumptrackov po Slovensku ale neuvadzatie ziadny zdroj. Odkial su tie nazvy, ktore su akosi vsetky rovnakej struktury?
Famlam (2023-04-27 22:38:04+00:00): Hoi R_S, wees je ervan bewust dat je hier en in een aantal andere changesets in deze tijd surface=paving_stones (=straatstenen) vervangen hebt door de minder specifieke waarde surface=paved (welke alleen verhard betekent, zonder te specificeren of het bijv. beton, asfalt, kinderkopjes, of straatstenen betreft). Hopelijk had je dit zelf gemerkt in het ruime jaar sinds deze changeset, zo niet, weer wat geleerd, hopelijk zonder teveel schade aan vooraf al getagde straatstenen :). Even ter plekke nagegaan (en gecorrigeerd), het zijn hier inderdaad gewoon straatstenen.
Omegatherion (2021-11-21 08:39:27+00:00): Moin alsisi, ich hab den Briefkasten gelöscht, der existierte bereits.
eggie (2021-11-08 21:22:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aceman444 (2021-11-18 00:01:01+00:00): Vas to nejako bavi stale vymazavat hranicu katastralneho uzemia Velke Kostolany. Zrejme si to myslite s obcou, ktora sa ale sklada z dvoch katastralnych uzemi.

A na hranicu obce https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2204227 by ste tiez nemali velmi sahat ak na to nie ste dostatocny odbornik a mate lepsi zdroj ako je to v OSM. Ziadny ste neuvidieli, len Ortofotomozaiku, kde samozrejme katastralne hranice nemozete vidiet, cize trochu zavadzate.
TheFighter137 (2025-07-23 09:00:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-il correct de cartographier les numéros des salles avec des tags addr:* ? Et une autorisation préalable de l'université a-t-elle été obtenue si les locaux ne sont pas accessibles au public ?
Karthoo (2021-11-08 20:15:56+00:00): *EV6
Patr1k_P (2022-09-16 14:26:03+00:00): vela adries nekompletnych, chyba housenumber a place....napr.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60865876

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60866877

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60866417
rthik007 (2021-11-09 07:12:26+00:00): "Hi Fannya Annisa,
I have modified the geometry and alignment based on the ground truth.
and fixed the edits accordingly.
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113550922.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113537899
kubahahaha (2021-11-09 10:16:00+00:00): Cześć. Co to znaczy że ta ścieżka jest rowerowo-piesza? Oznakowana jest w ten sposób?
kubahahaha (2021-11-09 10:16:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000626764
Dom1447 (2021-11-09 12:40:37+00:00): Że spokojnie można rowerem bądź pieszo ją pokonać. Ale jak.masz jakieś uwagi co zmienić to pisz :)
Jest więcej takich tras tak ze każda uwaga będzie cenna.
kubahahaha (2021-11-25 11:42:06+00:00): Moja skrzynka mailowa przekierowała powiadomienia do spamu, dopiero teraz to znalazłem.
---
name=* to miejsce na wpisanie nazwy ulicy, a nie takiego opisu, takie info wynika z innych tagów - highway=path już zakłada że drogą można jeździć rowerem i chodzić pieszo.
Jeśli z jakiegoś powodu jest to niemożliwe to dodaje się tagi odpowiednio foot=no lub bicycle=no.
Jeśli jest tędy wyznaczony jakiś szlak to warto zaznaczyć go dodatkowo, mogę to zrobić, bo to trochę więcej roboty.
Skasowałem tą nazwę z tej drogi.
Xvtn (2021-11-08 21:54:12+00:00): A while ago I went back and forth on what tags the paths on campus should have, I eventually settled on following this bike map: https://www.usu.edu/abb/images/Printable-Bike-Map-Trifold_Page_2.jpg
- "shared sidewalks" on that map as cycle + foot designated
- not marked on that map as generic "path".

What do you think of this? Or should they all be the cycle + foot designated? Not sure.
Jordi MF (2021-12-30 18:59:33+00:00): Hola Angel,
La la etiqueta sport=* debe tener los valores que se indican en la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport). No sirve de nada escribirlos en castellano o de cualquier forma. Revísalo cuando puedas.
Saludos,
Jordi
user_12500175 (2022-10-26 14:49:07+00:00): Hallo,
hast du das vor Ort überprüft?
Auf dem Luftbild "Bing Maps Luftbild" ist da eine Brücke zu erkennen?

Gruß
Danfost
DukeDrake (2022-10-27 06:32:47+00:00): Hallo,
ja, ich war damals vor Ort, wollte über die Brücke gehen und habe mich ziemlich aufgeregt, dass ich jetzt nen riesen Umweg gehen muss. Ja, ich bin mir sicher, dass da keine Brücke ist. ;)

Grüße

Ralph
user_12500175 (2022-10-27 08:50:22+00:00): Ok, dann passt es ja.

Ich würde dir allgemein empfehlen in ID bei Bildmaterial auf "Bing Maps Luftbild" umzustellen das ist in unserer Gegend bedeutend schärfer und genauer aus die "Bavaria (80 cm)"

Gruß
Danfost
Andy Noma (2021-11-08 20:54:42+00:00): aknoma is the user name for my additions of hight voltage towers near Earl Rush street in Roseville, CA
T99 (2021-12-11 04:45:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit but you accidentally changed a segment of Earl Rush Drive. I have already fixed the bug.

Also, what are those power pylons? All power lines in the vicinity are already mapped. Is there a temporary line serving a construction site?
multimodaal (2021-12-28 12:31:29+00:00): Beste Peter, heb het pad hersteld, helemaal verwijderen heeft niet de voorkeur aangezien -afgezien van een deel van de bruggen) het pad en bruggen niet geheel fysiek verwijderd zijn. Waar nodig de access-tags aangepast naar de nieuwe situatie. Zo is beter herleidbaar dat je hier niet mag lopen en wat de achtergrond is, ook als je bijvoorbeeld vragen hebt nav oude Mapillary-foto's, strava tracks of achterhaalde knooppuntenkaarten. 

Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history 

Vriendelijke groet!
rthik007 (2021-11-09 06:42:26+00:00): "Hi Fannya Annisa,
I have added the roads and aligned based on ground truth which were deleted by you. In satellite imagery we can see clear image of the roads 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113549948.
check following changesets also 
113538467
113538322
113538257.
In changeset:113538793 water way  is being hanging on both sides Kindly do the edits accordingly,
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113538651
bxl-forever (2021-11-10 00:58:59+00:00): Thanks but just a small tagging point here:
"highway=construction" must *always* be used along with construction=* (cycleway, residential, path…)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction

Happy mapping. :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-07 06:20:26+00:00): What is the meaning of display_surface in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9236397457/history ?
user_1566574 (2022-08-07 06:47:01+00:00): It's the area of the information displayed. Height + width = display_surface=X
The wiki explains it better (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:advertising=poster%20box?uselang=fr)
snoozingnewt (2021-11-08 21:36:08+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Make sure to square each building you make with the "Q" key. By doing so, they are more realistic and look much better!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113539585
JJWW (2021-11-14 18:02:02+00:00): Hoi Padvinder, ik heb van de kissing_gate (wederom) een gate gemaakt, zie discussie op https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74226

Hekjes op voetpaden graag niet markeren als kissing_gate tenzij ze echt een sluis-functie hebben.
snoozingnewt (2021-11-08 21:41:46+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Make sure to square all rectangular buildings you make with the "Q" key. It makes them look much nicer!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113539825
JesseFTW (2022-05-31 00:39:36+00:00): Please don't make changesets without any comment; it seems from context like this was part of the Modified name="forest"/"Forest" tag #maproulette https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/23293 task, but it's still important to leave a comment on every changeset.
Swedneck (2021-11-08 21:49:42+00:00): forgot to include USA/Mexico/Canada/Scandinavia Topo Maps layer in JOSM as source
beobab (2021-11-09 13:38:33+00:00): I mean, landuse
praeteritum (2023-06-11 04:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137190658.
Glassman (2021-11-09 19:15:32+00:00): #TIP: Save and upload your edits before moving to a distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113540937
maraf24 (2021-11-13 13:01:12+00:00): Jak rozumiem po źródłach, nie byłeś tam osobiście?
kokoimatsuchi (2021-11-13 13:10:27+00:00): Może bez owijania w bawełnę, mógłbym się dowiedzieć, w czym leży problem?
maraf24 (2021-11-13 13:54:41+00:00): Tory były prawidłowe oznakowane a ty to wszystko pozmieniałeś.
kokoimatsuchi (2021-11-13 14:05:07+00:00): Wszystko nie było prawidłowo oznaczone - LK52 jest wszędzie jednotorowa, a w obrębie stacji nie może być nagle dwutorowa (Instrukcja Id-12). Plus nieoznakowany tor LK858. Plus lokalizacje linii sprzeczne z mapą PKP PLK
kokoimatsuchi (2021-11-13 14:06:10+00:00): I oczywiście cofanie całej mojej edycji, opartej źródłami różnej maści jest poważne. Takie samo pytanie, jak wcześniej Ty mi zadałeś - byłeś tam osobiście?
maraf24 (2021-11-13 15:46:31+00:00): Zmiany zostały wycofane, bo linia nie została wyremontowana i jest nieużywana.
Kiedyś poświęciłem wiele godzin czasu mapując nowe tory do Hajnówki i zbierając relacje od osób, które tam były.
Jesteś chyba 4 osobą, która ot tak sobie te zmiany nadpisuje, nie sprawdzając nawet jaki jest stan aktualny.
Btw, czy te mapy, regulaminy i instrukcje to są źródła dopuszczone do użytku na potrzeby OSM?
Mashin (2021-11-09 02:27:52+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.
Several things I would like to point out:
1) Please don't delete objects to replace them with new objects. To do it correctly, modify the existing object shape to update it.
2) Hole numbers don't belong to name= tag, but should be in ref= tag.
3) Why was it necessary to delete all the Tee nodes? They contained useful information e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2908414180/history
4) This is not the correct way how polygons with holes inside of them are traced: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000618120 . Look at here how it is done as multipolygon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
seewäldler (2021-11-09 09:26:58+00:00): Hallo GerhardFN,
was möchtest du denn hier eintragen? Den Punkt den du jetzt gemappt hast ist ein "Park" neben dem Gebäude und ich glaube nicht, dass das richtig ist. Ich vermute eher, dass ein office=ngo mit passendem Namen innerhalb des Gebäudes das Richtige wäre.
praeteritum (2023-06-09 06:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137121313.
ottwiz (2021-11-30 09:36:24+00:00): I hope you will fix the forest boundary because the w:1000645713 isn't accurate, it overlaps into houses and such
rivermont (2021-11-30 13:02:21+00:00): It is a work in progress, like some other areas of landcover
ottwiz (2021-11-30 15:54:00+00:00): Ah, it makes sense
mweper (2021-11-09 14:43:59+00:00): I have reverted the changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113568419 ) as the street name is correct. It is named after "Carlos Forest" ( https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Forest ).
user_389895 (2021-11-11 19:52:39+00:00): ¡Gracias por arreglar mi error y sobre todo por la amable explicación! :)
Me gustaría tener más atención a estas cuestiones.
NieWnen (2021-11-08 22:43:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2927887
mapper999 (2021-11-09 16:12:14+00:00): Laut https://bnn.de/karlsruhe/pfinztal/sanierung-von-b293-und-b10-in-berghausen-verzoegert-sich-erneut dauert die Sperrung nur noch bis zum 22. November, falls sich das nicht weiter verzögert.
Bitte beachte, dass es häufig einige Tage bis Wochen oder sogar Monate dauert, bis alle Datennutzer ihre Kartendaten aktualisiert haben. Daher bitte keine kurzzeitigen Sperrungen (<3-12 Monate) eintragen, bzw. geeignete Tags (z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions) nutzen und zumindest mit einem 'note'-Tag den Grund und Dauer der Sperrung dokumentieren.
archpdx (2021-11-09 01:32:59+00:00): Hi Redblue37 and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding the address for this building.

-archpdx
Davileci (2021-11-09 10:54:56+00:00): Die Küstenlinie ist die Lage, wo das Land trifft das Meer. Dies Eiland ist um Gezeitengewässer.
praeteritum (2023-06-08 05:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137079783.
ivanbranco (2021-11-09 15:50:12+00:00): en:wikipedia=* non è un tag valido, potrebbe essere wikipedia:en=* ma non è necessario perché esiste già wikipedia=it:Italia e le pagine wikipedia in lingue aggiuntive si usano solo quando "the subject is included in an article on a broader subject in the secondary language".

Come mai hai cancellato int_name, official_name:cs, official_name:de, official_name:el e official_name:eo?

Hai aggiunto place=nation, che al momento risulta l'unica occorrenza di questo value al mondo. Ci sono però già 220 place=country, tra cui l'Italia.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:31:52+00:00): Ho cancellato i tag official name perché bloat facilmente ricostruibili sapendo le regole di ogni lingua.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:32:05+00:00): Int name non significa niente
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:33:22+00:00): Place=nation è più adatto, andrebbe usato su tutte le nazioni e country andrebbe usato sui paesi costitutivi di alcune nazioni come il Regno Unito.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:34:00+00:00): Il fatto che nessuno abbia mai mai pensato di farlo non è un valido motivo per dire che sia sbagliato
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:34:55+00:00): Nel commento sul mio changeset di reverting hai fatto un mischione tra i 5 changeset che ho revertato
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:37:13+00:00): Ho descritto come "reverting changeset without discussion, and also calling it vandalism" solo il primo, che ha revertato il changeset di Alecs01 che cancellava il changeset di Milano, che di sicuro non era vandalismo, come del resto non è nessuno dei miei changeset.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:40:45+00:00): Consiglio di guardare la pagina del dizionario per vandalismo. Io in coscienza so di non fare questi changeset con lo scopo di creare problemi ma soltanto di migliorare la mappa.
Effettivamente la discussione con Alecs01 ce l'ho avuta, quindi forse il commento non era troppo adatto, ma non abbiamo trovato un punto di incontro ed è stato deciso unilateralmente che avevo torto senza nessuna argomentazione whatsoever.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:43:02+00:00): Avevo aggiunto en:wikipedia perché non avevo capito come funzionasse, infatti quando me l'hai fatto notare ho eliminato il tag, dato che sono uno che non accetta le critiche e pensa di avere la verità in tasca.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:46:32+00:00): Effettivamente quando dici --Quando è esattamente quello che hai fatto tu. Hai revertato la modifica della relazione Italia quando io stesso ti avevo commentato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113542902) e non hai risposto.-- hai ragione; ho sbagliato, ma tra le note e gli altri changesets che ho commentato ieri e l'altro ieri mi è passata la voglia di commentare anche questo.