piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sabo24 (2021-01-03 12:32:50+00:00): Lieber Lukas zwischen jedem Gebäude ist ein kleiner Park ich habe keine Lust jeden kleinen Park einzeln einzutragen daher habe ich die ganze Siedlung in eine Parkfläche umgewandelt damit das nicht so komisch aussieht wenn der wenn ich jeden Park so schlangenartig oder so zickzackmäßig durch die Lücken in der Siedlung Ziehe. Ich bitte dich daher um Verständnis. Steven
limes11 (2021-01-03 23:18:47+00:00): Ich denke nicht, dass dies eine vernünftige Verwendung des leisure=park tags ist.  Vergleich:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Aus meiner Sicht fallen die Gruenflaechen unter landuse=residential. 

Dass hier Anwohner spazieren gehen oder Kinder die Spielplätze benutzen, macht daraus keinen Park. Der primäre Zweck ist entscheidend.

Viele Gruesse, Limes
user_3022894 (2021-01-04 17:12:48+00:00): Jap. So, wie es Steven jetzt gemacht hat, sieht es m. E. n. ja schon besser aus.
limes11 (2021-01-04 18:03:31+00:00): Stimmt, aber was ist mit den kaputten Multipolygonen? Flickt das jemand?
user_3022894 (2021-01-05 20:40:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1332219 habe ich reparieren können, auch wenn es jetzt keine inner mehr hat. Das kann man später noch in eine Fläche ändern.


Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1935742 komme ich zur Zeit leider nicht wirklich klar, da das ziemlich groß ist. Das müsste am besten ohnehin aufgeteilt werden. 

@ Steven: Bitte demnächst darauf achten, dass nur andere Landnutzungen aus einem Wohngebiet ausgeschnitten werden müssen, als Industrie- oder Gewerbegebiete oder Einzelhandel. Parks und Spielplätze aber eher nicht. Die sind leisure und nicht landuse.
limes11 (2021-01-05 21:19:24+00:00): Vielen Dank!

Ich habe die andere Relation so gut ich konnte geflickt und dabei einige ehemals innere Gebiete entfernt. Viele verklebte Grenzen, riesiges Gebiet, was fehleranfaelligeres kann man kaum konstruieren. Mal schauen, wie es aussieht, wenn es neu gerendert wird
Cristoffs (2021-01-02 10:16:29+00:00): i to się chwali! Tylko nie pisz o sobie tylko o zmianach jakie wprowadzasz :-)
abakus_uploader (2021-01-02 23:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dodoelk (2021-03-06 10:21:08+00:00): poprawiłem adres Kolonia Przerośl 118. Wprowadziłeś tam miejscowość Przerośl i ulicę Kolonia, a to nie jest prawidłowy adres. Jeśli chcesz mapować a masz jakieś pytania to pisz, pomogę, albo zajrzyj na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
EXPLORIDING (2023-02-21 12:12:41+00:00): Buongiorno, chiedo informazioni su chi ha nominato questa strada, come Strada dei Cannoni e su quali dati/riferimenti. Grazie.
Botaler (2023-02-21 23:31:04+00:00): Dei 47 percorsi che risultano in questo changeset, solo uno contiene nel name la parola "cannoni", con la c minuscola. Si tratta della way che compare sinteticamente nell'elenco come:
"Cà Nerina - Strada dei cannoni (292263449, v6)"
L'ultima modifica è stata fatta da Botaler, ma il nome è comparso già nella: Versione #1
Sentiero Foresti-Fontana dell'asino
Modificato oltre 8 anni fa da dgolle
Gruppo di modifiche #24076207
ndm (2021-01-02 00:32:24+00:00): There's a fence across a service road - which seems odd. Not quite sure what you're trying to do? 

Note: a lot of stuff is drawn using ESRI clarity not Bing.
ndm (2021-01-02 00:37:36+00:00): Sorry, missed the gate
fredley (2021-01-02 10:08:56+00:00): I live in the area, so am using my own knowledge (and Bing), I had to look up what ESRI was!
GOwin (2021-01-10 06:16:43+00:00): Hiking paths in this area looking much better now! Thank you.

Re the incline tag. This information is usually paired with the direction of the way/line and should either have a value of up or down, depending on the direction it was drawn.

Use incline=up for ways going up the hill in the direction of the way, and incline=down for ways going down the hill in the direction of the way. You shouldn't use both (e.g. incline=up/down)
Constable (2021-01-02 18:05:01+00:00): Ciao Luca,
sicuro che questo edificio sia una casa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891096622 ? sembra che tu abbia cancellato l'edificio generico che era stato aggiunto alla mappa qualche anno fa e lo abbia sostituito con questo, etichettato come building=house . Sono certo che quella non sia una casa, ma piuttosto un edificio di servizio per i ripetitori che si vedono a fianco.
Luca T98 (2021-01-02 18:46:40+00:00): Ciao, sì stavo inserendo e sistemando la precisione dei sentieri grazie alle heatmap strava e mi sono accorto che anche la posizione dell'edificio era errata, devo averlo cancellato e ricreato anzichè modificare il preesistente, errore mio, ti ringrazio della segnalazione e ti ringrazio se riesci a inserire l'indicazione precedente.
Constable (2021-01-03 08:30:49+00:00): Ciao Luca,
grazie, ho provveduto a ripristinare l'edificio. In effetti il vecchio edificio ed il tornante a fianco erano probabilmente male allineati, il fatto che le varie immagini aeree spesso siano a loro volta male allineate complica il posizionamento degli edifici, tuttavia non lo trovo un gran problema, una volta che nella mappatura rispettiamo le proporzioni siamo abbastanza a posto direi.
Grazie tra l'altro per aver migliorato la geometria di alcuni sentieri, mancava qualche tornantino qua e la e poco altro che hai aggiunto.
Grazie!
aharvey (2021-01-04 09:40:01+00:00): usually highway=pedestrian+area=yes is used for a plaza, square or mall, that can't be represented as a linear way. For the pavement running along side the road along the row of shopfronts, usually that would just be a linear sidewalk way and not an area polygon.
CoyKoi (2021-01-02 02:42:06+00:00): Hi ingoratsdorf welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits, all looking great. I can see you requested a review for this changeset, which was updating the tags of Tawharanui campground.

The changeset looks good to me, and adds valuable detail to the camp site. My two suggestions would be:
1 - Be wary of copy-pasting text from external sources, as you did for the description. This can be problematic depending on the copyright of the source (it's probably fine in this case) Better would be to write your own summary of the pertinent info.
2 - For a more advanced and detailed edit, you could try drawing the campground as an area - tracing around the approximate boundaries from aerial imagery. Within this area you could distinguish between the tent-only and campervan areas, and draw in the trees which separate the 'bays'
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96791110
user_5359 (2021-01-02 06:20:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
Dawid2849 (2021-02-01 16:12:14+00:00): Dzięki! :)
Warin61 (2021-01-09 05:22:14+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

The building=* is for the building only, not the building + grounds. 

----------------------
You would be better using Ersi imagery here as it has more resolution. 

Please edit these building so that they are the building footprint only.
Warin61 (2021-02-08 07:38:24+00:00): No response. I have deleted many of these.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-02 01:32:52+00:00): Actually yes I do - it was 5 in an old value
wireguy (2021-01-02 12:27:51+00:00): Nice work JTM!   Thanks for updating the boardwalk.
wireguy (2021-01-02 12:29:46+00:00): Thanks Michael for the work down the shore.  And sorry I got your name wrong, whoops.
aharvey (2021-01-04 09:06:55+00:00): Personally I'd prefer to leave off the access tag, and just add motor_vehicle=private or motor_vehicle=no.
aharvey (2021-01-04 09:13:39+00:00): Reasoning is generally it is accessible to the public, with the exception of authorised motor vehicles only.
Ant2020! (2021-01-04 10:56:20+00:00): Agree with aharvey. An access track for public use and emergency vehicles. Not suited to roadie touring bikes. Suited for mountain and gravel bikesonly
flohoff (2021-03-12 17:31:06+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier in dem Changset mind. 2 Parkplätze eingetragen. Es reicht für das Routing nicht die Fußwege an den Parkplatz (Also die Fläche) anzuschließen. Die Fläche des Parkplatzes wird nicht für das Routing verwendet. Das ist eher zu sehen wie ein POI - Also ein Geschäft oder ein Haus. Man sollte eine Zufahrt auf den Parkplatz legen (highway=service/service=parking_aisle) und dann die Fußwege daran anschließen. 

Und ein wenig aufpassen das der Parkplatz nicht auf dem Haus liegt oder andere Objekte teilweise überlappt.

So long 

Flo
flohoff (2021-03-12 17:33:03+00:00): Ach ja - Was mir noch aufgefallen ist. Wenn du einen Fußweg an ein Haus anschliesst dann gehört auf den Node noch sowas wie "entrance=main"

Guck mal hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance

Das habe ich jetzt hier nicht gemacht weil das ja nicht alles die Haustüren sind sondern teilweise scheinbar auch hintereingänge. Da kannst du ja nochmal gucken.

Flo
flohoff (2021-03-12 17:35:01+00:00): Nochwas ist mir aufgefallen. Du hast die Fußwege von der Straße zum Haus an den "landuse" angeschlossen. Das ist auch unnötig. Auch auf dem Landuse findet kein routing statt.

Flo
flohoff (2021-03-13 14:04:06+00:00): Hi,
ich habe auch noch die kleingartenanlage "Klein Istanbul" entdeckt. Das ist doch Mumpitz vom Namen oder?

Gibts da irgendwo eine referenz zu ?

Flo
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 04:38:14+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891116737/history
HikeAndMap (2022-10-13 02:57:20+00:00): yes - that on very short intervals - it keeps going up and down.. to short to map.. but the ups and down to significant as to assume "flat"
heretofore (2022-07-02 01:34:10+00:00): There's a broken poly just south of the dam.
ZeLonewolf (2022-07-02 01:46:41+00:00): Can you be more specific?
heretofore (2022-07-02 16:56:24+00:00): Yes, sorry. I should have included the link to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12122181
ZeLonewolf (2022-07-02 21:56:07+00:00): Thanks for the note, I think we got it squared away.  I removed the fragment relation and reordered the actual watershed boundary relation, which is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12122180
heretofore (2022-07-02 22:05:49+00:00): Excellent. Thank you!
steerage250 (2022-03-31 08:23:26+00:00): G'day, I just drove up Albany Hwy and (as we passed by at 110kph), I could not see any evidence of a fuel station on the corner of Chinninup Rd as you created on Feb 1st last year.  Could you please clarify what you intended for this location ?
thanks
Ian
letihu (2021-01-17 15:45:49+00:00): Hallo,
wie bekommst du das hin, dass viele doppelte nodes übereinander entstehen?
Z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311257/history#map=19/51.16457/6.99862&layers=N
unter
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311257/history#map=19/51.16457/6.99862&layers=N
oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311255/history
unter
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311256/history
oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311253/history
unter
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8282311258/history
Vieleicht solltest Du JOSM verwenden. Der Editor weißt dich auf Fehler, vor dem hochladen, hin.
mrpulley (2021-01-02 10:05:28+00:00): Just letting you know that these new roads are open. I surveyed them recently, and didn't know you had added them until I was uploading my edits.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-01-02 10:08:31+00:00): Ah, nice timing then! I saw they were missing and none of the newest imagery had them as done
ASHIF C R (2021-01-02 06:01:51+00:00): Fresh cakes are available,lavishly
Alan Bragg (2021-01-03 12:02:27+00:00): I'm not so sure about removing private CR's. They do indicate that the land is "conserved"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96796032
TomPar (2021-01-04 06:48:02+00:00): Hi Alan.  Thanks for the feedback.  I acknowledge this is an often contentious issue.

In my opinion, these private CRs, where there is no general public access, has caused more issues than benefit.  My main points:

There is a proliferation of third-party apps, like AllTrails, that suck in OSM data, often without tagging nuance.  It clutters up the map, makes it harder for the average end-user to route plan, and increases the likelihood of unwitting trespass because these private parcels look just like bonafide public land on these app's render.  I know we don't have any control over how these polygons are used elsewhere, but I feel a responsibility as a data steward to be realistic on how the data is potentially (mis)used outside of OSM.

I also have concerns about how these polygons' metadata violate some of the mapping privacy norms outlined here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

A lot of these private CRs are individuals' primary residence.  OSM is not a property registry and citizen names should not be listed as "owner=*".

Perhaps my concerns could be satisfied by just eliminating the "leisure=nature_reserve" and all the other MassGIS metadata.  However, I don't know what these apps are keying off.  Perhaps the newer boundary=protected_area too?

My biggest concern is a chilling effect such that landowners are less likely to sign future CRs because they fear their private land may be interpreted as public.

If it wasn't for the convenience of MassGIS OpenSpace layer and that en masse import a decade ago, would we be mapping these private CRs individually nowadays?  I tend to think not.

Happy to continue the discussion on here or on Slack. Thanks.
JayTurnr (2021-01-02 10:55:02+00:00): The tag was added by StreetComplete after it asked me if pedestrians are allowed to walk on the road here. Since the northern edge of the road was a fence which is already drawn and the southern edge of the road has definitely has a fence in the past (need to resurvey if it's still there) I knew there were physical restrictions in place to stop you from walking on the road, so I clicked the option that said "No, pedestrians aren't allowed to walk on the road."
mariotomo (2021-04-08 13:00:22+00:00): hola.  no sé si todavía estás interesado en mejorar tu estilo de mapeo.  este "centro hospitalario especializado" es un único edificio, con cuerpos de diferentes niveles.  no es sencillo mapearlo bien, pero se puede.  ni idea porqué te saliste del grupo donde estábamos coordinando las acciones.
gurglypipe (2021-01-02 17:34:19+00:00): What was incorrect about the foot= tagging here?
gpserror (2021-01-11 05:26:35+00:00): Thank you for your addition to Open Street Map.  However this addition does not map out your business and conflicts with an existing business.  Please move your POI to your building of business operations, else we may have to revert this addition.  Thanks!
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:56:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
job (2022-04-02 19:49:47+00:00): Hallo friedl,
mir ist aufgefallen dass du in Relation 2221014 in diesem Changeset addr:street=Altenhofen verwendest - hier wäre aber addr:place passender, da es sich bei Altenhofen nicht um einen Straßennamen sondern um einen Siedlungsnamen handelt (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place). Wäre es für dich ok wenn ich das entsprechend ändern würde?
job (2022-04-03 10:45:11+00:00): Hi nochmal,
hab jetzt bei genauerem Nachsehen in der History festgestellt dass der addr:street Eintrag von mir gekommen ist und hab's deshalb jetzt einfach gefixt.
friedl (2022-04-03 21:16:10+00:00): Hi job,
ja, passt natürlich. Hab das vermutlich damals auch nur per Copy-Paste übertragen und nicht genug darauf geachtet, ob street oder place besser passt.
lg
friedl
natureman2222 (2021-02-09 07:47:58+00:00): Hello? I'm a South Korean. Kaesong has been separated from North Hwanghae Province since 2019.
Source : https://namu.wiki/jump/o%2FKIPHw7ojeeAIrG8p2Aic9FT6ZAuJG0bVHLE4bDOVSKZIoXDf9BOBCk2Q5mFwLNs2ZLSSw1hEiOt7D2zYRqTc0ULQplsmaXd5rWom2bPRM%3D
dgitto (2021-01-09 08:37:00+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OSM.
Benissimo l'aggiunta di amenity=school, però non devi togliere il tag building, altrimenti cessa di essere (anche) un edificio :-)
Dunque ci aggiungo building=school
eggie (2021-01-02 11:28:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review.. Alle adresnode zijn al aanwezig als import vanuit de BAG -Kadaster. (Alles ligt op een hoopje) Het is niet nodig om nog adresinfo toe te voegen. Dat geeft verwarring.
Je bijdrage bij adresnode 92 haal ik weer even weg.

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-02 11:32:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #96802833

Mocht een adres niet kloppen dan kun je dat aan het Kadaster  doorgeven middels een terugmelding
MVG
eggie
Marco Magliano (2021-01-02 11:10:25+00:00): The track is not completed, but i cannot see to proceed and close it.
flohoff (2021-03-19 17:36:06+00:00): Moin
du hast hier die Zufahrt zur Hausnummer 82 Lippstädter Straße zu einem Track gemacht. Das ist unsinn. Das ist ja eine Hauszufahrt kein Ausschliesslich für die Land/Forstwirtschaft genutzter weg. Ich mache das mal wieder rückgängig.

Flo
rakulle (2021-01-03 09:52:24+00:00): Altglascontainer wurde verlegt im Zuge des Neubaus der freiwilligen Feuerwehr Dölau.
danieldegroot2 (2021-01-08 15:40:21+00:00): Salut,

Lorsque vous cartographiez des bâtiments carrés, vous pouvez les sélectionner et cliquer sur le bouton "Q" ou faire un clic droit et choisir "Square" pour les mettre en carré. Vous pouvez également choisir d'en faire un "Cercle". Vous pouvez trouver d'autres raccourcis clavier en cliquant sur le bouton "Aide" dans la barre latérale droite
Essayez également de cartographier l'ensemble du bâtiment, même s'il est couvert de plantes.

Amusez-vous à cartographier !

Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite)

---
Hey there,

When mapping square buildings, you can select them and click the "Q" button or right click and choose "Square" to square them. You can also choose to make it a "Circle". You can find more keyboard shortcuts by clicking on the Help button in the right sidebar
Also, try to map the whole building even if it's covered by plants.

Have fun mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:07:17+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
marczoutendijk (2021-12-18 19:42:20+00:00): Hello kaveh2018
Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8283421405
you made a typo: rdige should be ridge 
but a ridge cannot be on a node but should be on a line/way.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dridge
Shaun das Schaf (2021-01-02 17:05:07+00:00): Hallo ThomasA57HGH, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Wenn ein Weg so wie hier wirklich nicht mehr vorhanden ist und auch nicht mehr auf den Luftbildern erkennbar ist, kann er ohne Probleme gelöscht werden.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
eggie (2021-01-02 12:03:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Editor iD heeft de neiging overal aan vast te plakken. Hier aan de landuse.. Ik maak het even los.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96803417
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-02 12:26:55+00:00): Landuse losgemaakt van De Hille..  Gelijk ook maar correctie Haagse Dijk naar Haagsedijk conform BGT data. 
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen. 
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-01-02 12:38:59+00:00): typo De Hillen natuurlijk.
ndm (2021-01-02 13:48:55+00:00): Bing Streetside (can be a bit old) https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=85857154-7f9c-4225-ad2c-d153859f8c68&cp=51.565082~-2.641074&lvl=19&dir=16.438393&pi=-23.147562&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 doesn't show any signage that it's illegal to walk here?
ndm (2021-01-04 23:36:59+00:00): No worries, I can easily revert it.
eggie (2021-01-02 12:30:59+00:00): Beste Hans. Beter geen editgebied van deze omvang bewerken. 
Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten met alles wat daar aan vast zit.
Kun je svp precies aangeven wat je hier allemaal hebt gedaan.

MVG
eggie (2021-01-02 12:37:27+00:00): Ahh.. Ik zie al wat je hebt gedaan, maar beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Ik zie geen schade. 
mvg
eggie
ndm (2021-01-02 17:17:05+00:00): It was only recently changed - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4439520/history Unfortunately, not in my immediate locality -- so I added an OSM note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2459623
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-04 16:51:58+00:00): Hi Bierphysik.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2021-01-02 21:59:35+00:00): Dag Multichill
Je vraagt om feedback.
Lijkt me oke.. 
maxspeed 30 zal niet geldig zijn op fietspaden. Die regel dus verwijderen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96803921
MVG
eggie
multichill (2021-01-02 23:07:22+00:00): Nog even nagekeken hoe dat zit. Het hele gebied is een 30 zone en het fietspad valt binnen de zone, zie https://www.fietsersbond.nl/nieuws/maximaal-15-kilometer-per-uur-voor-fietsers/
eggie (2021-01-02 23:09:13+00:00): Oke.. up to the local mapper 😁
ivanbranco (2021-12-22 16:52:00+00:00): Hi Vonter

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891226347

what's the meaning of place=Austintown?

place values should be stuff like village, city, town ecc.
Vonter (2021-12-23 15:35:49+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,

Looks like I made a mistake earlier when I copied the values on to the way from the school node in that area. I have removed the place tag  now. Thanks for the info!
mavl (2021-01-02 15:23:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок добавляет магазины по продаже рыбы прямо на воду. Вероятно, это ошибка. Эти магазины удалены с карты. Если вы хотели таким образом обозначить свои места рыбалки, то их не нужно помещать на общую карту.
totera (2021-01-02 13:21:42+00:00): Ti risulta che esistono questi percorsi?