piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tuxayo (2019-09-12 10:49:08+00:00): Il y a eu un déplacement de l'autre côté de la rue par erreur du supermarché.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67859079

Je vais corriger ça
tux67 (2019-03-07 06:28:11+00:00): Hallo Daniel41,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Solltest du größere Aufgaben und Bereiche in OSM bearbeiten wollen (also nicht "on the ground", sondern Armchair mapping betreiben), dann ist Streetcomplete eher nicht das Mittel der Wahl zum Mappen und ein Wechsel zu JOSM oder iD auf dem Desktop empfehlenswert.
Die Angabe von lizenzrechtlich OSM-kompatiblen Quellen und aussagekräftigen Kommentaren sind wichtig (nur bei StreetComplete werden die Kommentare automatisch generiert) .
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht 
tux67
tux67 (2019-03-07 07:24:26+00:00): Es reicht, wenn pro Haus eine Hausnummer gemappt ist. Nicht jedes Gebäudeteil braucht eine. Nr. 81 und 83 hatten jeweils das Vorderhaus gemappt. Sollte Streetcomplete die Häuser als welche mit fehlender Nummer angezeigt haben, liegt das vielleicht daran, daß diese mit dem tag building=house versehen waren. Auch da hilft ein Blick in die echte Karte. Wenn die Hausnummer schon da ist .. nicht nocmal mappen.
Wenn wirklich mal eine Adresse fehlt, dann bitte zumindest Hausnummer UND Straße erfassen.
Aus meinen "Fundus" neu gemappter Gebäude ohne Adresse kann ich aber durchaus im Umfeld noch "Arbeit" zur Addressrecherche anbieten: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/GIZ ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67859122
tux67 (2019-03-07 07:24:27+00:00): Es reicht, wenn pro Haus eine Hausnummer gemappt ist. Nicht jedes Gebäudeteil braucht eine. Nr. 81 und 83 hatten jeweils das Vorderhaus gemappt. Sollte Streetcomplete die Häuser als welche mit fehlender Nummer angezeigt haben, liegt das vielleicht daran, daß diese mit dem tag building=house versehen waren. Auch da hilft ein Blick in die echte Karte. Wenn die Hausnummer schon da ist .. nicht nocmal mappen.
Wenn wirklich mal eine Adresse fehlt, dann bitte zumindest Hausnummer UND Straße erfassen.
Aus meinen "Fundus" neu gemappter Gebäude ohne Adresse kann ich aber durchaus im Umfeld noch "Arbeit" zur Addressrecherche anbieten: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/GIZ ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67859122
viloan (2019-03-06 21:00:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
luschi (2019-03-14 17:39:21+00:00): Hallo FF1111,

du hast vor einiger Zeit Hydranten eingezeichnet und einige als "Überflur-Art = Nass" eingetragen.     
Mit der Überflur-Art wird beschrieben ob der Hydrant bis oben hin immer mit Wasser gefüllt ist oder nicht.     
Wenn du "Nass" auswählst heißt das so viel wie: Der Hydrant ist bis oben hin immer mit Wasser gefüllt und kann so im Winter gefrieren und würde somit kaputt gehen.     
Wenn du "Trocken" auswählst, heißt das, dass der Hydrant tiefer in der Erde das Ventil zum verriegeln hat und so nicht direkt bis oben hin mit Wasser gefüllt ist. Dieser Hydrant friert dann im Winter nicht ein oder platzt.

In Südtirol, sowie in allen Zonen wo es kalt wird, sollten eigentlich "Trockene" Hydranten in Verwendung sein.     
"Trockene" Hydranten sind leicht daran zu erkennen, da sie oben auf dem Hydrant ein einzelner Absperrhahn ist.     
"Nasse" Hydranten haben für jeden Anschluss einen eigenen Absperrhahn.

Kannst du das bitte noch einmal kontrollieren.     
Danke

lg     
luschi
tux67 (2019-03-07 06:37:17+00:00): Auch wenn man sich nicht blind auf inproveosm verlassen darf und immer nur das mappen sollte, was man vor Ort kennt .. in diesem Fall hat das Tool recht und dieses Straßensegment ist oneway. 
Vielleicht erkennt man das auf der Karte im Web besser warum ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67859695
ovruni (2019-03-06 22:12:41+00:00): Hola
En esta edición se ha colocado un tipo de relación incorrecta. Procedo a revertir.
Saludos
Omar
ovruni (2019-03-06 22:16:19+00:00): Veo también que esta relación pertenecía anteriormente a otro hospital y era un multipoligono.
Ethan G S (2019-06-19 03:12:49+00:00): Thank You!
PT-53 (2019-03-08 11:33:56+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
Du hast in diesem CS Deine Änderungen aus CS # 67180100 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67180100#map=13/47.7443/9.6288) wiederholt, die ich damals zurückgesetzt habe, da Du auf unsere Anmerkungen nicht eingegangen ist.
Einfach die Änderungen nochmal wiederholen finde ich einfach nur traurig.
PT-53 (2019-03-08 11:34:47+00:00): PS:
Ich habe die Änderungen wiederum zurückgesetzt.
InsertUser (2019-03-07 19:09:34+00:00): I think [junction=circular](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular) was chosen  for [way 26397622](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65138248) in the end.
TheAnimappor (2019-03-07 22:22:23+00:00): Hi there, 
You can add junction=circular if you’d like. Do you disagree with my classification?
InsertUser (2019-03-09 00:28:51+00:00): I can't remember the signs on this specific junction. I think one of the 'circles' in this area has unusual priorities, but I'm not sure which. Unfortunately, as IIRC the signs are all physical rather than painted so aerial imagery isn't very useful.
TheAnimappor (2019-03-11 15:51:42+00:00): Both Strava heat map and natural traffic flow support traffic outside of the circle having right of way. Due to this, I feel like there is more evidence supporting that this isn’t a roundabout.
InsertUser (2019-03-11 17:14:12+00:00): I don't buy that logic. Strava only indicates the frequency of the route chosen, not how long it took to traverse, or whether there was anyone there to yield to. General road cleanliness indicates much the same.
TheAnimappor (2019-03-12 19:58:43+00:00): Restored the previous geometry and classifications on these circular junctions.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-07 00:22:18+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added a park here and named it "Tennis courts". We try to avoid describing things with names on OSM (name should be used for actual names of places/things such as "Rob Kimek Tennis Centre" as opposed to just describing what they are with that particular tag. You should tag tennis courts as leisure=pitch and sport=tennis (or just type tennis court into the iD editor and it will find it for you).

If you have any questions, feel free to ask, and always remember you can check out the OSM wiki for more info :)

Happy Mapping!
wille (2019-03-07 21:09:14+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição. A área do porto de salvador já estava mapeado e você deletou algumas vias dentro do porto que existiam
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67861677
Ls92 (2019-03-08 09:24:17+00:00): Uma pergunta. Alguém tinha colocado uma linha referente a ponte Salvador/Itaparica.
Eu deletei pois ele tinha distorcido a rua Julio da Paixao
A ponte nem foi construída ainda, como alguém pode ter colocado?
wille (2019-03-08 12:37:56+00:00): Respondendo a várias das suas questões de uma só vez:

O OSM permite mapear elementos "proposed", algo que existe um plano de se construir, mas que ainda não existe na realidade. Eu sou contra mapear esse tipo de coisa, pois acho que não tem utilidade nenhuma.

Os dados do IBGE, se não me engano, são de 2010. A importação foi feita a partir do conjunto de dados aglomerados subnormais, são áreas de morros, favelas, vilas... O dado não é 100% previsto, quase sempre é necessário corrigir um pouco os limites. Vou restaurar a Vila 12 de Outubro.

Obrigado! Temos alguns grupos no telegram, caso você tenha interesse em se envolver mais com a comunidade do OSM: https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade https://t.me/OSMBA
viloan (2019-03-06 22:42:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GinaroZ (2019-03-07 13:23:49+00:00): Is this house really named "Shazeb's House"...? Same with Alex's nearby.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 09:40:49+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du das landuse von der brücke entfernt?
PT-53 (2019-03-07 11:20:19+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in,
was bedeutet denn landuse=1 ?
Fragende Grüße
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 11:22:11+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
den key landuse=1 habe ich nicht verwendet.
PT-53 (2019-03-07 13:12:33+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in,
 gem. Hystorie hast Du layer=1 in landuse=1 abgeändert und wsoroe hat das wieder auf layer=1 zurückgesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62283304/history
Grüße
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 13:13:58+00:00): Ok. Das hatte ich nicht auf dem Schirm. Mir ging es aber in dem CS darum, warum die Brückenumrisse kein landuse mehr haben.
PT-53 (2019-03-07 15:15:34+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in, 
um solche Mißverständnisse zu vermeiden ist es immer sinnvoll, einen Link mitzugeben.
Grüße
user_507893 (2019-03-09 12:28:28+00:00): @ ma-rt-in
Halte dich an die Eintragungsrichtlinien und lies nach, was https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dbridge zum Gebrauch von landuse sagt.

Mache es dir zur Angewohnheit, Änderungssätze vor dem Senden an die Datenbank mittels Validator zu prüfen.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-10 12:43:44+00:00): Hallo wsoroe,
ich habe die Wiki-Seite, sowohl DE als auch EN, gelesen und keinen Anhaltspunkt gefunden, das ein Brückenumriss kein landuse erhalten sollte. Oder kann es sein, das wir hier aneinander vorbei reden?
vg
General Updating (2020-09-20 09:37:27+00:00): #Import
M!dgard (2019-03-06 23:15:07+00:00): *source=local_knowledge
ovruni (2019-03-07 13:08:23+00:00): Hola
No se porque motivo se ha añadido una vía sobre otra vía, pero no es correcto. Procedo a revertir esta edición. Para cualquier consulta la puedes hacer en cualquiera los canales de la comunidad https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Omar
Hernan (2019-03-07 13:56:42+00:00): Hola! Gracias por ayudar con los limites de los pueblos. Fijate solo como cosa para arreglar, que por ejemplo en este pueblo, marcaste el limite, pero a la relación le agregaste landuse=residential y no es correcto ya que la relación del pueblo incluye lo que se ve como campos de cultivo (landuse=farmland) Para el residential deberías hacer otra relación, con solo las áreas de casas (inclusive deberías intentar evitar las industriales, aunque eso a veces es complicado desde imágenes sin conocer bien la zona)
Saludos
Hernan
SPalferro (2019-03-09 01:16:48+00:00): Hola, ok, ya lo cambio.
Saludos.
wille (2019-03-07 21:34:42+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67863086
Ls92 (2019-03-08 09:21:08+00:00): Muito bom editar esse mapa
Conheci o Openstreetmap no ano passado
mas passei a editar recentemente com base nos locais que ando
minha opinião que esse mapa é bem  que os concorrentes, e está em constante desenvolvimento
eu sempre busco divulgar as pessoas
Warin61 (2019-03-07 02:32:51+00:00): Reverted.
Glassman (2019-03-07 03:21:13+00:00): We don't use descriptive names. The address will appear on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67863210
Warin61 (2019-03-07 02:43:01+00:00): No changeset comment... again. 

Tree cover is NOT repeat NOT a park and therefore has no name.
Reverted. and change sets 67786489 and 66042338. 

Lambert park is NOT all trees. 

The area of Lambert Park is best mapped using the LPI Base Map - not an area of trees and grass.
sjevtic (2019-03-07 21:38:51+00:00): Please do not tag streets inside Blok 3 as highway=service. They should be tagged as highway=living_street (or highway=service and service=parking_aisle in some cases).
spuddy93 (2019-03-07 22:01:01+00:00): 	Hi sjevtic,

	I will make sure I keep that in mind for any future work I do in Blok 3. Thank you for letting me know. Also, sorry for using the wrong country in the changeset comment! I had just finished doing work in Bulgaria and accidentally typed thoughtlessly.

	Have a great day.

	spuddy93
sjevtic (2019-03-17 14:02:35+00:00): I haven't seen your new edit before. I just want to thank you for your cooperation.

Happy mapping!
ovruni (2019-03-07 15:39:57+00:00): Hola
He retirado la etiqueta "name=Building" por no ser necesaria a menos que el edificio tenga un nombre. Para cualquier consulta a la comunidad https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Omar
mrpulley (2020-01-23 11:59:08+00:00): Just letting you know that I've revised some of these camping areas at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79973060 from a recent camping trip (prior to the bushfires). I've noticed that the Forestry Corporation web site has confusing information. For example, Dobbie Rim is listed on the web site https://www.forestrycorporation.com.au/visit/forests/chichester as a picnic area, but on the PDF map linked from this page, it's listed as a camping area. (The signs there have camping.)
Warin61 (2020-01-23 22:44:19+00:00): Head office vs local office? Go with what is on the ground. I have camped in this area for a few decades, while I don't know all the area I have some interest here.
andrewwiseman (2019-03-07 01:33:48+00:00): Looks great, thanks for mapping!
GeoJess (2020-08-17 18:39:50+00:00): Hi Fidibiri,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I’ve noticed in this area: 1.36807/104.17006 (way: 675068822, for example) that a lot of the powerplant areas are tagged as buildings. According to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building), the building tag can be used for a man-made structure with a roof, standing more or less permanently in one place. I believe the proper tagging for this area should be based on this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant . Please kindly review the area to check for powerplants that need adjustments. Let me know if my message is unclear and if there is anything else I can help with.

Regards,
Jesspher
andrewwiseman (2019-03-07 01:30:32+00:00): Looks good, thanks for mapping! Don't worry about mapping farms for this project though
Warin61 (2019-03-07 06:24:27+00:00): Hi,
These are better viewed with the NSW LPI Imagery.
Rodrigo Hausen (2019-03-10 22:41:44+00:00): Please make sure sidewalks are properly connected to nearby ways. For instance:
* way 503864084 is not connected to none of the adjacent roads;
* way 503865771 is not connected to either 15 Avenue SW or 6 Street SW
I suggest you make smaller, more accurate edits instead of mapping larger areas at once.
Rodrigo Hausen (2019-03-10 22:44:21+00:00): Also, way 675068151 intersects 129791765 but they aren't properly connected. These are just a few examples, you'll need to check every way added in this edit for proper connectivity.
hoserab (2019-03-11 00:00:27+00:00): First of all I didn't add ways 503864084 or 503865771. And if you actually looked at the changesets you'd see I was adding connections.

Second of all, 503864084 and 503865771 aren't connected to the roads in question simply because the crosswalks haven't been added yet. Rather than expending your energies adding fixme tags why don't you make yourself useful and add the crosswalks?
brzoskwinia_ (2019-03-07 09:12:30+00:00): To nie były zdublowane punkty. W tym miejscu istnieje zakład produkujący meble tapicerowane, jak i ich sklep firmowy. Teraz jest błędnie, ponieważ zaznaczony jest tylko sklep.
B_KSL (2019-03-07 22:59:33+00:00): Pomyliłeś zestawy zmian. Powyższy nie ma z tym nic wspólnego. Chodzi Ci prawdopodobnie o 67861159 albo któryś z sąsiednich kolegi Yohn79. Ale i tamten jest moim zdaniem ok, pomijając że przeoczył zdublowany adres. Zaznaczył nie tylko sklep. Zakład produkcyjny też jest. Uzupełnił tagi dotyczące firmy. Chyba jest ok.
brzoskwinia_ (2019-03-08 08:34:21+00:00): Ok, sprawa rozwiązana ;)
mavl (2019-03-07 13:29:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Парикмахерская не находится в здании. Это ошибка.
viloan (2019-03-07 03:47:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AkuAnakTimur (2019-03-07 04:26:51+00:00): My first import: please let me know if there are errors so that it could be rectified as soon as possible.
abakus_uploader (2019-03-07 23:30:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-03-07 05:28:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-03-09 14:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jmapb (2019-03-07 15:58:32+00:00): Hi dumisanisny, two questions: 1) Is this a doctor's office? 2) Are you aware that the website you posted doesn't work?
crevier (2019-03-07 05:53:48+00:00): I work on this campus, very familiar with buildings. I should have renamed this building, not removed it. Wondering if there's a way to just undo my removal. (Sorry.)
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].