piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grouper (2016-12-27 00:00:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Changing highway=residential to highway=footway does not improve accuracy. Neither does adding highway=footway to a golf course boundary. Please add highway=footway that matches the real world to help improve the map.
Commodoortje (2017-06-02 09:40:15+00:00): Dit voetpad is voor verbeteringen vatbaar.
Er zitten wat (beginners) foutjes in. Dit komt omdat je het uit 1 stuk hebt opgetrokken.
Mijn vraag is dan ook om je voor te stellen op het forum, waar je hulp kunt verwachten om dit stukje netjes in kaart te krijgen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=648589#p648589
zors1843 (2016-12-23 08:59:40+00:00): P.M. to user
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 01:50:38+00:00): Hi Curt, thank you for helping improve OpenStreetMap! You write that the object you deleted is not a path. I'm curious what it is? I do not know this park, but from aerial imagery, it looks like the object you deleted is a dirt area of uniform width around the entire park, and I would have guessed it's a path. Can you help me understand? Thanks, David
iMarbot (2016-12-23 04:01:36+00:00): This is indeed a gravel-based path that goes around the edge of the park and should not have been deleted.
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 06:38:17+00:00): Since two users (shinewend and iMarbot) say this path exists, and it appears to exist in aerial imagery, and one user says it's not a path (Curt Decker), I've gone ahead and reverted this deletion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44612908. Curt, feel free to respond explaining your reasoning why this is not a path. -David
DaveF (2016-12-22 22:21:54+00:00): Interesting. I thought that wood was private land. How do you gain access? Does it join the A39? Is it sold wall along that stretch?
DaveF (2016-12-22 22:19:23+00:00): Could readd the boundary=administrative tag please.
Dalkvist (2016-12-27 03:26:29+00:00): Hej våra kartor visar bara hur värden är inte hur vi önskar att det var, så vi har rullat tillbaka dessa ändringar. 

Om du är intresserad av att kartera verkliga förhållanden skicka ett medlande till mig så kan jag hjälpa dig att komma i gång.
trigpoint (2016-12-23 17:27:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think this change has gone a little wrong, you have changed New Walk from a pedestrian street to a footway which seems a little odd to me as it has been mapped that way since it was first mapped 9 years ago. Just wondering why you consider it to be wrong?
You have also created 2 new footpath ways 461225544 and 461225541, but they do not connect to anything.
Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2016-12-24 10:48:51+00:00): I have restored New Walk and Highcross to highway=pedestrian
ToeBee (2016-12-24 06:10:07+00:00): Please do not put data into OSM just to try and affect Pokemon Go. This seems to be a driveway and not a footway. I have retagged it as a driveway. I have left the other information you tagged such as width, lighting and surface. I hope these are correct.
ToeBee (2016-12-24 06:26:07+00:00): Please do not edit OSM just to affect Pokemon Go. I have undone these changes. If you want to try and affect Pokemon Go, find some real footpaths that are not mapped and add them. OSM is a real map for real things. Changing it just to affect Pokemon Go is vandalism.
letihu (2016-12-23 21:54:37+00:00): Zu den Haunummern fehlt noch die house-tags ;-)
highflyer74 (2016-12-23 16:41:55+00:00): Hallo Niwel und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Gibt es diesen Weg auf dem Spielplatz wirklich, oder ist es nur ein "Test um zu sehen ob Fußwege Pokemon Spawns erstellen"?

Nur für den Fall, daß nicht, sei Dir bitte bewußt, daß Du an einer öffentlichen Datenbank arbeitest, die sich nicht für Tests eignet, da mit ihr seriöse Landkarten erstellt werden. Es wäre gut, wenn Du ein kurzes Feedback dazu gibst.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf 

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
richlv (2016-12-27 16:17:20+00:00): hey, these footways do not seem to match the sat imagery much, and it's lightly doubtful that they are 2 metres wide...

could you please take mapillary imagery of all the affected area ?
the data does not look that good currently, i have to admit that i'm inclined to remove it.
highflyer74 (2016-12-23 17:05:23+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. 

Bitte "verklebe" Flächen nicht mit Wegen, da das die spätere Bearbeitung massiv erschwert. Auch achte bitte darauf, möglichst genau zu arbeiten. Die Eisenbahnlinie begrenzt den Park Richtung Osten, insofern sollte er dann auch nur bis zur Eisenbahn reichen. Ich habe ihn entsprechend angepasst.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
Katerina Stavraka (2016-12-22 22:02:37+00:00): Δρομάκι περιπάτου.
pnorman (2016-12-24 10:22:49+00:00): Is the footpath this close to the lake? It doesn't look like you can walk around all of it
grouper (2016-12-26 23:50:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please do not add bogus highway=footway ways or change highway=residential, etc to highway=footpath unless it matches reality.
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 07:55:41+00:00): Hi, I've drawn the recreation ground which is all foot access.
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 10:47:38+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenSreetMap.
You might not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database. Thus everything we add must be correct and precise. I have reverted your changeset/additions because they added ways are duplicates and somewhat fictitious. I hope you can understand the desire to keep OSM as the best, most accurate and up to date map in the world.
Regards
ToeBee (2016-12-24 06:49:12+00:00): Please do not modify OpenStreetMap just to affect Pokemon. OSM is a real map of real things. I have reversed this edit.
b-jazz (2018-10-19 16:36:52+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM. I removed this "path" though since it is just along a street and there is no actual path there. (and it loops around a couple of times which makes it cross itself at certain points). Maybe you are trying to indicate sidewalks. If that is the case, you might want to do it by using satellite imagery instead of uploading gps tracks. Also, does the "preschool" in the area have a real name? You might want to use that instead of just "preschool" on the node. LMK if you have any questions. Happy to help.
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 08:01:19+00:00): Hello, I've tidied up the paths you marked and placed descriptive tags on them. They will now appear on the map.
I drew the paths from the Bing image, hope they are OK. How do the paths connect to the recreation ground and/or paths to the south please? Also do you know details of the nature trail area, boundary's etc and any other public access around there? 
Regards.
Moose55308 (2016-12-22 22:39:13+00:00): Here is a link to the trails within the park as well: 
http://www.ci.becker.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/145
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 09:43:57+00:00): Northern section of path was a duplication of an existing cycleway.
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 13:50:06+00:00): Hi you now have here the existing service road (Greenwich Industrial Estate) and your footpath (the movement) on top of each other. One must be wrong? 
Also each word in a proper name should be capitalised.
Carlos Quiñones Seirul-lo (2016-12-23 14:02:11+00:00): There is no industrial Estate anymore for a few years. Now there's a housing complex called The Movement and this path is a very good shortcut to the greenwich train station
Geofreund1 (2016-12-26 13:08:01+00:00): Jetzt fehlt nur noch layer=1
 ;-)
DavidKewley (2016-12-22 23:38:42+00:00): Hi ALEEF02, as a fellow OC mapper, I welcome you to OSM, and thank you for helping improve our shared map! I'll give you some feedback, to help you learn. Here you added a new path. I've edited it to 1) connect it to the roads (implicitly sidewalks) that it meets, and 2) eliminate the out-and-back sections, simply making T junctions of two separate path objects. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44606133 for a visual representation of the changes I made. Let me know if I can help in any way. -David
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 12:56:05+00:00): Have been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44639040
MiroJanosik (2016-12-27 10:04:49+00:00): I'd say this edit is a mistake, see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44604818 (many points of road moved with same delta, side-jump of the road).

Newly created path is going through building and does not have any tags...

Contact me, and I can help you to map it properly. Otherwise I will have to revert your changes.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-07 14:37:18+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add "game features" such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567649976 to OpenStreetMap.  If there's something really there on the ground, map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-05-07 14:37:54+00:00): Χαίρετε,
Μην προσθέτετε "δυνατότητες παιχνιδιού" όπως το http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567649976 στο OpenStreetMap. Αν υπάρχει κάτι πραγματικά στο έδαφος, χαρτογραφήστε το, αλλά αν εμφανίζεται μόνο σε ένα παιχνίδι, παρακαλώ μην το κάνετε.
Τις καλύτερες ευχές,
Andy
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 13:53:30+00:00): removed duplicated way, added foot=yes tag to specifically imply foot use.
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 00:14:38+00:00): Hi ALEEF02, another bit of feedback. Here you adding a swimming pool, which is great. You also moved two house address nodes, which you probably didn't intend to do. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44604914 for a visual representation of your changes. I suggest using care with click-and drag in case that caused the accidental moves. And when you save your changes, take a look at the list to make sure they're what you intended. I've fixed the two moved houses. Cheers, David
yurasi (2017-02-07 15:04:00+00:00): Hi, I will revert this edit since it's not properly. Please, you should have more careful in your edtions.
Colin Smale (2016-12-25 22:41:57+00:00): hi, is this path really in a cutting, i.e. at a significantly lower level than the surroundings, like the inverse of an embankment? just wanted to check as it sounds a bit implausible...
rskedgell (2023-07-06 07:40:14+00:00): No evidence from aerial imagery. Tag removed.
sdoerr (2016-12-23 01:47:05+00:00): Is this 'garden park' a real-world thing, or just something you made up?
ChameleonNinjaX (2016-12-23 02:19:13+00:00): Local development, community project, you don't need to comment if it doesn't concern you. It's a local collaboration in the works for almost a year now, there will be a few of these generated over the next 5 year spread
sdoerr (2016-12-23 12:43:16+00:00): OK, it's just that the boundary seems to cut through several property boundaries (and even through some houses). Maybe it's just an approximate boundary?
rskedgell (2023-07-06 07:13:44+00:00): No, it doesn't exit. Never did, since it clearly doesn't exist in Bing's aerial imagery even 6 years later.

It's just a rather sad attempt to cheat at Pokémon Go.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138174457
sdoerr (2023-07-06 13:52:37+00:00): Thanks for doing what I should have done several years ago. I always meant to pop down there and check but never did. Like you, I had concluded it was a PoGo bodge. - Steve
rskedgell (2023-07-06 14:20:32+00:00): No problem.

Taken in isolation, they used a reasonably plausible story. It was probably shared on a PG cheat channel, e.g. "how to stop mappers immediately reverting the fake park you've added in your mum's back garden." Friends who play inform me that this method of cheating no longer works.

I wonder if it's possible to search changeset comments for the text in their reply. Assuming it's been copied and pasted verbatim, that could yield a few more "parks" to review with extreme prejudice.
eggie (2018-01-08 14:09:42+00:00): Alsnog ... Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
czubi (2016-12-23 14:14:24+00:00): Ich habe Dir eine PM geschrieben bitte melde Dich mal.
Dalkvist (2016-12-27 02:46:12+00:00): Hej kull att du vill hjälpa till med karteringen.
Det ser ut som att denna redan ligger inne som cyckelbana har den nyligen ändrats till gågata eller gångfartsområde (https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anvisningsm%C3%A4rken#G.C3.A5rdsgata)?

Vi har många olika taggar som inte alltid är uppenbara :)
ToeBee (2016-12-24 07:23:04+00:00): Please do not edit OpenStreetMap just to affect Pokemon Go. OSM is a real map for real things. Does this park actually exist?
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 08:21:50+00:00): Revert due to Pokemon vandalism
by dvdhoven.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45584844
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 08:22:10+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit lijkt op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid worden.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
dvdhoven (2017-01-28 08:32:53+00:00): As no one of these walking trails are footway's, but cycleways and tracks, I have reverted this changeset with changeset 45584844
nammala (2017-01-12 05:03:11+00:00): Hi GRawat006
 
Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and lot of community members are involved in adding and improving the data which is ground truth and exists on the ground. The edits which you have made has been destructing the map . Please do concern and stop doing bad stuff on the Map. Let me know if you need anything from me. You can go through this http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contribute_map_data.

I went ahead and reverted your changeset.

Regards,
nammala
Upendrakarukonda (2016-12-23 08:49:05+00:00): Hello  crazy snaps,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems to be not good. Can you please fix it? Follow this guide http://learnosm.org/en/ to improve your mapping skills.
Regards
Upendra.
trigpoint (2016-12-23 09:02:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this addition? I am not aware of any such path. The name also looks a bit odd.
Cheers Phil
Zanigan (2016-12-23 09:39:29+00:00): Hey Phil

Yeah, made corrections to the playground in town. For some reason the name 'Minsterley Play Ground (with in-built GYM)' kept to other corrections made for some reason. Would I have to delete and re-create again to change the title?
There is also a public footpath that goes directly through the field surrounding the farmyard (located in the centre), however, the public historically stick to the external field to reduce damage to crops. 
Cheers 
Zan
trigpoint (2016-12-23 14:54:42+00:00): There is no need to recreate the playgound, the odd title is only on the changset, although you may want to disconnect it from the road.
The name on this path is is probably not verifiable and the path obviously exists so is fine.
It would be good to map the legal lines, if a farmer illegally obstructs a public highway with crops then he needs reporting to the council so they can take action against him. You are legally entitled to walk through the crop, and certainly should not go around to avoid damage.
Grillo (2016-12-28 15:39:53+00:00): Hi, please note that Openstreetmap is a real map based on real data. Please do not add data just to affect Pokemon go (which I suspect is what you are doing). I will revert this edit but please keep mapping in the future. If you will do so, please only add objects that exist in reality.

/Andreas
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 12:59:22+00:00): Have been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44633085
Upendrakarukonda (2016-12-23 08:45:56+00:00):  Hello Tuureluur18,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems to be not good. Can you please fix it? Follow this guide http://learnosm.org/en/ to improve your  mapping skills.

Regards


Upendra.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-23 17:29:42+00:00): I removed all the edits made by this user.
It is pure vandalism.
Dalkvist (2016-12-27 02:23:15+00:00): Welcomme to openstreetmap!

It is not obvious but the cycleway is marked for  foot trafik as well. If you click on the white-blue dashed line in the editor and scrolldown on the left side it is listed under allowed access.

I have removed the duplicated way, feel free to message me if you have any questions.
mattchn (2016-12-24 04:40:29+00:00): Hi, I've seen that tried to the way to make the way appear on the map. However, pistes are not rendered on the "standard" map that you see on osm.org. There are some specialty maps focusing on outdoor or ski activities, and pistes get rendered there (but highway=piste will not have an impact there). See for example https://www.thunderforest.com/maps/outdoors/ or maybe even better for this purpose http://www.opensnowmap.org/?zoom=16&lat=40.58463&lon=-105.10927&layers=snowbase&marker=false
cosmocatalano (2016-12-24 23:16:50+00:00): Yes—I should have specified visibility on Strava's map. The issue in part seems to be that they still render closed loops as areas, even with explicit "area=no" tagging. Though the previous edit of this particular closed loop caused it to disappear from the Strava map entirely—possibly related to the golf course overlapping it.
DD1GJ (2016-12-26 22:44:52+00:00): Willst Du Pokemons anlocken? Siehe https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2016-December/113743.html
user_5359 (2016-12-26 20:20:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kannst Du mir mehr zu der Kirche erzählen, die den Namen Rosenbeet trägt?
FTA (2018-11-17 21:03:38+00:00): Hey DJ, just came across your local town edits a few years later and wanted to thank you for them--they help put Logan County on the map! Take care!
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:00:38+00:00): Have been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44613083
lostmike (2016-12-23 06:39:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just a few comments on your first edit though.
There's no footpath or leisure park anything like that in Broadmoor as far as I know. Have those houses been demolished recently? Footpath seems a little unlikely too.
The Saundersfoot path is a little erratic and doesn't connect to the existing road as would be needed for correct routing by satNav devices.
lostmike (2016-12-23 13:40:56+00:00): This appears to be Pokemon related. (?) You are editing a real map, not a game map.
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 01:40:38+00:00): Thank you hillbillyspree! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Like you, I volunteer to improve the map in Orange County. Your mapping of Willows Park looks basically good, thank you. The footways you marked earlier on the grounds of Greentree Elementary don't seem to correspond to actual footways, at least not in aerial imagery, which is not so good if those aren't actual paths on the ground. In OSM our goal is to improve the map so that it better represents what's really there. Adding paths that aren't there is discouraged, even if it helps spawn pokemon in a cool park. :) Let me know if I can help in any way. -David
pnorman (2016-12-24 10:19:37+00:00): The east part of the footpath is traced over itself here
pnorman (2016-12-24 10:08:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM. It's good to see more people mapping in the suburbs.

I've fixed up a couple places where paths were doubling back on themselves, and added the park.

Does this park have a name?
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-23 12:56:13+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81262868
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-23 12:56:33+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81262868
santamariense (2016-12-23 14:34:55+00:00): Você não deve se guiar pelo nome da tag place=city/town/village. Você tem que sim se guiar pela faixa populacional. Silveiras seria uma village, não por ser traduzida como vila, mas sim porque tem população inferior a 10 mil habitantes. mais info @ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:place
neuhausr (2017-10-31 16:19:47+00:00): Hi, I know this is old, but this path seems incorrect--features should generally be able to be seen on the ground and verified. The horse fest path looks like it's a temporary feature? If so it should be removed.
scruss (2016-12-23 01:15:17+00:00): Hi - welcome to OSM. Thanks for your contribution, but you can't edit according to google earth
ToeBee (2016-12-24 07:34:48+00:00): Please do not add fictional information to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset you actually destroyed information that someone else had added. This is vandalism and I have reverted it. Your subsequent edits seem ok to me. Please keep the good data coming. Just leave pokemon out of it :)
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:01:22+00:00): Have been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44613231
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:02:00+00:00): Have been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44613231
BCNorwich (2016-12-24 07:05:29+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for adding the park. Just a few pointers I have removed a duplicate park outline. Amended the park outline, name and path. 
There are many more features to this new park it would be good if you could survey and map them.
Regards Bernard
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:02:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44613231
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:02:31+00:00): reverted
Alan Bragg (2017-01-29 18:28:21+00:00): Hi, Nice job adding paths. I added some buildings to go with the paths but I don't know their names.
Noen (2017-01-07 21:02:47+00:00): Velkommen til OpenStreetMap og gratulerer med ditt første endringssett!
Det ser ut som du tagget Østmarka og Sørmarka som en park, ved et uhell?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1442391
jc86035 (2016-12-23 06:59:42+00:00): Hi, from the Bing satellite imagery this doesn't appear to actually exist so I've removed it for now.
5m4u9 (2016-12-23 13:56:43+00:00): thanks!
maxolasersquad (2016-12-27 13:59:02+00:00): It is no necessary to do name="Baseball Diamond", etc. Just properly tagging the field as leisure=pitch and sport=baseball is sufficient. The renderer will decide how to properly communicate sport pitches.
Samuele Battarra (2017-01-07 23:37:35+00:00): Ciao, hai creato una nuova strada sovrapposta a quelle già esistenti, i percorsi non si inseriscono così, bisogna riutilizzare le strade che ci sono già. Provvedo a ripristinare la situazione preesistente.
nammala (2016-12-23 03:40:14+00:00): Hi _gnX_,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. It is an crowd source project and every data you add here is very valuable and make sure you do proper edits and not personal information. The way you have added is not valid and I am going ahead and reverting the changeset as it makes no sense. Let us know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
5m4u9 (2016-12-23 13:59:47+00:00): gracias por contribuir, voy a corregir la categoría porque los pollos son comida rápida y no restaurantes
Glassman (2016-12-24 00:19:22+00:00): The addition to Saint Edward park is not part of the park. I'm changing the tags to just landcover.