piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-11 09:26:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Do not tag highway=track in urban areas like here.
Path  ( the track is < 1.8 mtr wide) is the correct choise.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127314244
Frans S (2022-10-11 09:26:56+00:00): Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.

Please read this wiki about tagging highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127314244
Frans S (2023-01-18 11:32:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Please use the correct highway tag. You tagged here minor, unimportant traces as a main highway. (secondary road)
Please read and follow the tagging info on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
Frans S (2022-10-11 10:22:33+00:00): Hi. I reviewed this mapping as well. 
Sorry to say, but very sloppy mapped.
Again, please take the time to map accurate.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127314499
JJIglesias (2022-10-10 17:38:43+00:00): Hi, Could you please add the tag Source:name to identify where the waterways names that you add came from?

Thanks and Best Regards

JJ
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:35:41+00:00): Teruggedraaid. Gebied is eerder door mij opnieuw ingetekend. Afzonderlijke landuses graag in tact laten.
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:28:10+00:00): Verwijderde track heb ik weer teruggezet is gewoon via satelliet zichtbaar.
opendcc (2022-10-30 15:43:54+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast da bei der Kohleralm einen Getränkeshop und eine alpine_hut eröffnet. M.W.  trifft das eher nicht zu. Ist die Hütte wieder bewirtschaftet?
Und was ist das für ein Name: Very little, standing water and might not be drinkable.??
map per (2022-12-02 14:38:26+00:00): @opendcc: Hab die Kohleralm korrigiert (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3394169)
MxxCon (2022-10-12 04:27:42+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
Satellite imagery doesn't show that there's a traffic-controlled crosswalk, yet you mapped one?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127315149
Gabe DeFreitas (2022-10-12 11:40:48+00:00): Hi this crossing has pedestrian signals (but no road markings).
Mordechai23 (2022-10-11 15:15:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154149723
MxxCon (2022-10-12 04:32:23+00:00): Hello.
If a feature has 2 names you can use alt_name= tag as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Multiple_names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127315640
Gabe DeFreitas (2022-10-12 11:41:24+00:00): Sure thanks for the tip
eggie (2022-10-10 18:41:08+00:00): Dag Ries...  De routerelatie heb ik hersteld. Wellicht was die al stuk?
Je kunt het beste JOSM gebruiken als je routerelaties bewerkt. Met editor iD kan dat eigenlijk niet.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-10 18:43:54+00:00): De naam van een mtb route hoort op de relatie.. Niet op de fysieke weg.
In het begin is OSM allemaal rijstebrij.. Ik weet het.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-10-10 18:47:53+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Fixed..

No need foot=yes .. It's default..
bicycle=   also default on a cycleway..
It's a funny situation here. It's a pedestrian area. The cycleway is a trick for the routing. 
Greetz
eggie
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:25:32+00:00): Goedemorgen,

Zou je de landuses niet samen willen voegen? Deze geven perceelsgrenzen aan of de locatie van een in onbruik geraakte tracks.

Door sommige renderers worden de aparte landuses gewoon weergegeven
pjvds (2022-10-11 05:34:02+00:00): Deze area's komen van shapefiles en hebben geen betrekking tot perceelgrenzen.
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:39:50+00:00): De shapefiles zijn reeds eerder door mij geverifieerd en geven wel degelijk perceelsgrenzen aan. 

Dit hoeven geen kadastrale percelen te zijn maar onderscheiden zich door diversiteit in begroeiing, oude tracks pf bodemgesteldheid.

Op Actueel Hoogtebestand 3 kun je dit goed zien.

Mijn werkwijze is dat ik hertekende shapefiles de source update van 3edshapes naar AHN. Dit heb ik vroeger niet overal consequent gedaan.
BubbaJuice (2022-10-11 05:14:32+00:00): Hello 19timer96,

Please do not glue landcover polygons to roads like you have done in this changeset. Furthermore, don't glue them to nature boundaries or just boundaries in general. 

When these polygons overlap roads then you need to split the polygon there. You can't have them overlapping the roads. 

Please fix these issues or else these edits will have to be reverted and that's not fun.

-BubbaJuice
gscholz (2022-10-12 06:22:35+00:00): Hi Tess2344,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=45.87275&lat=3.08365&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127316987

This kind of errors irritate routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-12 06:29:47+00:00): Hi Tess2344,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=45.87275&lat=3.08365&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127316987

This kind of errors irritate routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-22 07:17:59+00:00): Hi Tess2344, 
these errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
trigpoint (2022-10-11 11:47:32+00:00): Hi
This edits has gone a bit wrong. Thieves' Lane is not the A5064 or the way to Shrewsbury;Crematorium;London Road Sports Centre;College of Arts and Technology
You have it on the wrong road.

Cheers Phil
cahartig (2022-10-11 13:14:35+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks so much for pointing this out! I have moved the sign over to the correct road A5064, so it should be all set now.

Thanks,
Caitlin
RaphaelPasloin (2022-10-11 04:11:08+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for using openstreetmap.

Make sure that's no warning before you save your edit. Buildings were overlapping.
NE2 (2026-03-07 05:56:01+00:00): Perhaps this was planned in the past, but the extension of CR 435 was never made. I just drove it and it's only signed TO 46. There are no signs indicating CR 435 uses old SR 46.
adrianojbr (2022-10-10 19:37:39+00:00): Olá, NeoCromancer!

Você conhece a documentação a respeito do mapeamento de vias cicláveis (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle)?

Essa linha que você adicionou (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102680285) atende os quesitos para ciclovia, em especial, há barreira física separando da via dos automóveis?
GeoCromancer (2022-10-11 12:20:45+00:00): Uma parte da ciclovia é separada por tartarugas e outra parte separada por estacionamento de veículos. olhando no detalhes da via principal diz que existe ciclovia no lado esquerdo, mas quando tento criar uma rota no brouter, ele fica fazendo zigzages tentando evitar a ciclovia. Você saberia a melhor forma de evitar isso?
adrianojbr (2022-10-11 14:43:31+00:00): Vamos por partes:

A separação por tartarugas caracteriza ciclofaixa (cycleway:*=lane na mesma linha da rua), pois esse tipo de separação não é considerada barreira física para veículos, sendo menos seguro onde há um meio-fio por exemplo.

Já o estacionamento de veículos, pode ser considerado uma barreira física, pois mantém uma distância mais segura dos veículos, o que pode ser mapeado em uma linha separada etiquetada com highway=cycleway.

Também há de se considerar a extensão e se há alternância de um tipo para outro, sendo preferível adotar um tipo de acordo com o que é mais predominante.

Por exemplo, a Rua João Meirelles, até onde lembro, é toda uma ciclofaixa (cycleway:*=lane). Já a Rua Desembargador Pedro Silva, de um lado, pode ser considerada uma ciclovia (há duas forma de mapear: 1. mais simples: na mesma linha da rua, etiquetar com cycleway:right=track; ou 2. em linha separada etiquetada com highway=cycleway); no outro lado o trânsito de bicicletas e na mesma faixa dos automóveis (cycleway:left=shared_lane). E na Avenida Engenheiro Max de Souza as faixas de tráfego são de uso preferencial de ciclistas, então inclui cycleway=shared_lane na mesma linha da rua.

Quanto ao brouter, primeiro cabe lembrar que não se deve mapear pensando em um uso exclusivo dos dados (para o renderizador), já que os dados são usados por diversos fins, por isso é importante seguira a documentação para haver padronização.

Dito isso, não costuma usar o brouter. Mas pelo menos a versão web (https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=16/-27.6134/-48.5885/standard&lonlats=-48.599524,-27.60164;-48.548841,-27.600329) parece fazer bom uso das ciclovias.

Se você indicar onde exatamente as ciclovias são evitadas, podemos ver se não alguma outra coisa que está impedido a rota, como uma restrição de acesso.
GeoCromancer (2022-10-11 17:23:07+00:00): Entendi melhor, deletei a ciclovia exclusiva e coloquei ciclo faixa compartilha na joao meirelles que estava faltando
literan (2025-11-11 06:27:54+00:00): добрый день. Зачем вы внесли целый комплекс фейковых данных в 2022 году здесь? зачем этот вандализм?

сейчас 2025 год, и никаких домов тут нет https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLC6fDPr - стоит промзона как и была
literan (2025-11-11 06:28:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102680445 вот пример выдуманного здания
maraf24 (2022-10-11 22:26:09+00:00): Jakie zmiany?
SP6ZOLW-7 (2022-10-12 18:54:20+00:00): zmiany nie wiedziałem co napisać zmęczony byłem zazwyczaj  
to co edytuje najpierw byłem w miejscu dokonanej zmiany osobiście
maraf24 (2022-10-12 20:27:57+00:00): To się może przydać: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-11 04:44:00+00:00): Hello. You're again destroying Lithuanian waternetwork data: breaking waternework, changing reservoir tagging to the schema we do not use in Lithuania. Please stop.
user_8101879 (2022-10-11 18:46:13+00:00): Hi,

please read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway : a waterway relation is not a collection of all elements of a river. To understand why, have a look to these relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/50790, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1657491
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/50793
And now think about adding waterbody to these rivers, it would be crazy relations, don't you think, impossible to open with ID editor and probably with JOSM too.

Water areas are only for mapping, it is useless for a waterway relation.

Please stop to add waterbodies to waterway relations.

Best regards
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-12 05:56:52+00:00): We have already went through this month ago, didn't we? :-) I agree that waterbodies (lakes, reservoirs are not part of a relation) - go ahead with that is it is a probem for you. I'm against removing river centerlines going through waterbodies. (And changing reservoir tagging schema is also not ok)
user_8101879 (2022-10-15 17:25:15+00:00): When I read this last comment, clearly you don't have looked at my work and reverted it by mistake.
beca
user_8101879 (2022-10-15 17:26:32+00:00): Because I'm agree with most of what you said, I will changed again this area in a few days.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-15 17:49:38+00:00): I've reverted because there have been a number of bad parts in the edit - removal of central way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686024028/history) as well as re-tagging reservoirs to a different tagging schema.
Note: I'm not adding waterbodies to waterway relations - I do not need it but it also is not a problem for any of our usages (therefore we mostly do not care about it).
user_8101879 (2022-11-02 19:15:25+00:00): Sorry to answer so lately : I'm on holiday and no time for osm.

If I removed the central way it is because it is not a central way : there are 2 rivers from this reservoir (so this reservoir is a spring), one going to the north, and one going to the south (they go to 2 different directions because the reservoir is at a high elevation point which means that these are 2 different streams : a unique stream cannot change of direction). They have the same name but it is probably an error.

My changes were a way to try to fix that : your reverse put back this bug so how to fix that now ? Do you have a better idea ?
Tomas Straupis (2022-11-02 19:34:57+00:00): Interesting :-) I will check with hydrologists after holidays. Official river data does not contain anything to the North of the reservoir, while official georeferential data is the same as OSM. And according to the rules official river data should use the river geometries of the georeferential dataset. There is clearly a contradiction there.
Tomas Straupis (2022-11-04 15:55:27+00:00): Ok. Seems this reservoir is getting all surrounding drain water. Northern part has a surplus disposal device so in Northern part water periodically goes into ditch or unnamed stream. Saria goes South.
adrianojbr (2022-10-10 18:25:35+00:00): reversão dos changesets 127050276,127052623,127052564,127052532,127052322,127052494,127052424,127052168,127050709,127050743,127051257,127051407,127051482,127051538,127052019,127052088,127050228,127049624,127049735,127049594,127049570,127049343,127048300,127047932,127047798,127047723,126788507,126788204,126787310 por incluírem elementos (vias, parques...) inexistentes
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:32:17+00:00): Ik heb de changeset teruggedraaid.

Ik heb dit gebied een poos terug opnieuw ingetekend en de afzonderlijke landuses nadrukkelijk laten staan.
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:33:51+00:00): De oude track waar witruimte is achtergelaten is ook nadrukkelijk zo gedaan.

Ook al is de status van de track onduidelijk, deze is nog duidelijk te onderscheiden.
pjvds (2022-10-11 05:39:12+00:00): Deze weg was tijdens mijn laatste survey niet totaal niet (meer) zichbaar. Is het niet beter om hem in te tekenen met een disused tag, dan met incorrecte landuse?
Tilia_J (2022-10-11 05:44:18+00:00): Ik kan hem op luchtfoto's duidelijk zien. Vaak is dit dan door gras overwoekerd en kan dan als zodanig ingetekend worden.
BáthoryPéter (2023-03-29 21:01:24+00:00): Szia! Ebben a módosításcsomagban mi volt a szándékod a waterway=stream_end címkével ezen a ponton: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9522279666/history ?
kogutowicz-mano (2023-03-30 03:56:04+00:00): Tuti biztos nem ezt akartam, hanem waterway=sluice_gate lett volna, mint a többi. Nyilván mellényúltam a menüben.
Kösz, hogy kiszúrtad! Javítom.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-13 12:44:37+00:00): MÍSTO PRO ODPOČINEK je len opisny nazov ktory tam nepatri..to ze to je odpocinkove miesto je uz vyjadrene znackou
gscholz (2022-10-12 06:21:14+00:00): Hi Tess2344,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=45.87275&lat=3.08365&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127318590

This kind of errors irritate routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-15 06:53:23+00:00): Hi Tess2344, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Tess2344 (2022-11-15 18:27:47+00:00): i have no idea what you are talking about.  i map for using the ID editor for HOT and once i've submitted the mapping i no longer have access to the square.
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:25:03+00:00): Hi Tess2344, 
thanks for your response. As described above, you tend to connect ways several times which leads to overlapping ways. Just click on one of those blue markers and edit the error with your favorite editor.
Guido
silversurfer83 (2022-10-11 07:15:02+00:00): Moin :)
Könntest du bei deinen Änderungen vielleicht auch einen kurzen, aussagekräftigen Kommentar dran lassen, damit man als Beobachter schneller erfassen kann, was du schönes gemacht hast? Wäre sehr nett und hilfreich.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
Amenophis (2022-10-11 18:33:55+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Tatsächlich finde ich es oft herausfordernd, zahlreiche Änderungen innerhalb eines Satzes als kurzen, aber auch aussagekräftigen Kommentar zu erfassen, Manchmal ist aber auch einfach (gebe ich gerne zu) die Bequemlichkeit. Zukünftig werde ich mehr darauf achten. Viele Grüße, Amenophis
abakus_uploader (2022-10-10 22:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Patr1k_P (2022-10-13 12:36:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102687874

objects should be edited first, not deleted! the building also had an address and you didn't copy it here
mueschel (2022-10-14 14:53:04+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded several areas with a strange tag "other_tags" like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102688774
Please check this.
Florestas Osm (2022-10-17 12:13:45+00:00): Thank you, corrected!
mapper377 (2022-10-11 13:59:23+00:00): Dover Road in Wayne County, OH, is US 250, not US 30.
user_5359 (2022-10-17 06:05:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1102689543 (one of twelve ways). What is the meaning of the tag other_tags = "RF"=>"ARPOADOR - ICK"? There is no other valid OSM tags.
Florestas Osm (2022-10-17 11:44:48+00:00): Thank you, corrected!
MxxCon (2022-10-12 04:43:10+00:00): Hello.
Could you please provide that FAA diagram?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319280
joncunn (2022-10-12 13:01:26+00:00): Here you go: https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/2210/pdf/00289AD.PDF
Glassman (2022-10-11 00:39:00+00:00): Comment: you tagged the service road as motor_vehicle=no yet there are trucks alongside of the service road. There also appears to be two gates on the road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319493
mavl (2024-11-13 05:36:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Glassman (2022-10-11 18:07:19+00:00): According to the city, division street does allow emergency vehicles to cross the railway as it was tagged.  Can you review your edit? Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319753
Zzz69 (2022-10-11 19:32:25+00:00): It has 2 padlocks on each side and a road closed sign. Showing the road at all on the map will lead to confusion/a dangerous situation. This crossing is officially designated as a private crossing by the Federal Railroad Administration and there are no longer any whistles, gates, lights or any warnings. I am a locomotive engineer and people being lead to closed crossings/unprotected crossings can be deadly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319753
Glassman (2022-10-11 18:16:04+00:00): If the way is a footway, can you add it back and tag it as highway=footway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319900
Zzz69 (2022-10-11 19:27:50+00:00): It is only a footway to N 32nd Court. The road no longer exists west of there. The area where N Smythe Road intersects with Pioneer St to the west has been completely changed and the Street has been renamed. I do not remember the new name off the top of my head and I only drove back there once so I do not know the correct layout of the streets. I believe eventually a street back there goes north and connects with N McCanta Way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127319900
tux67 (2022-10-11 11:31:03+00:00): Hallo Lothena1685,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Bitte gib bei deinen Änderungssätzen immer die Quelle deines Wissens an, damit andere Mapper die Changes nachvollziehen können.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127320024