piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CoyKoi (2020-07-06 11:47:19+00:00): Crud, I somehow made a slight move of many of the road geometries. Unintended - I will try to revert this now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87599100
Dimacn (2020-07-06 18:33:12+00:00): С какой стати деревни получили landuse=residential  ?!  В частности https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597461844 Много где было уже размечена жилая территория!  Вся территория деревни не является жилой территорией? Пожалуйста откатите сою правку!
Dimacn (2020-07-06 18:34:14+00:00): С какой стати деревни получили landuse=residential ?! В частности https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597461844 Много где была уже размечена жилая территория. Вся территория деревни не является жилой территорией!  Пожалуйста откатите свою правку!
Dimacn (2020-07-06 18:51:06+00:00): Пожалуйста откатите всю свою правку, а не только Пустынь. Таких деревень очень много, а вы всё попортили. Например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302080738  и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37285430  и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302022313  и многие другие !
xscvxc (2020-07-07 02:33:07+00:00): откатил
CoyKoi (2020-07-06 12:09:45+00:00): This didn't revert the geometry as I'd hoped.. The shift was minor enough, I will leave it as is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87600064
user_5359 (2020-07-06 13:11:17+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of rooms=0 for a hotel? Please don't add objects twice (once as node and a second time as area).
bridgeconst (2020-07-06 13:25:00+00:00): It's my mistake. I will delete this tag.
eggie (2020-07-06 12:24:02+00:00): Dit is inderdaad logischer, want het fietspad eindigde op een wandelpad. 
Voor de juiste tagging van de drie klassen fietspaden kijk een hier..
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Mapse,
Eggie
iccaldwell (2020-08-19 16:40:40+00:00): It should have been changed to traffic_calming=chicane see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
Frans S (2020-07-06 12:57:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Your mappings are very inaccurate and do not meet the HOTSOM quality standard.
It cost so much time to correct these that I revert the worst ones. These buildings needs to be mapped again.
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Warin61 (2023-08-05 06:07:43+00:00): Hi,
node 429521996 tagged as barrier .. OSM is not clear if this apples to both service roads or one only. I'd think it should be moved to where it looks like the fence is ?
mueschel (2020-07-08 09:34:48+00:00): Hi,
please make sure you add proper address tags to the objects. You used these keys that are not used in other places:
county, district, post_addr, sub_district

Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-06 12:59:34+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 87241302, 87241415, 87241497, 87241895.
eggie (2020-07-06 13:54:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
aaronsta (2020-07-06 13:18:35+00:00): Changeset reverted due to multiple conflicts. Proceeding in two-steps.
eggie (2020-07-06 13:56:45+00:00): Heel goed mogelijk.. Haal je wel maxspeed 50 hier weg?

MVG,
Eggie
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-07 07:18:08+00:00): Ciao,
Benvenuto nella community di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovate tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

Ciao e ancora benvenuto in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
eggie (2020-07-06 13:59:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review... Bij verhuizing blijft het oude adres toch intact...  ?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-06 14:07:54+00:00): Oude adres hersteld...  Info Van Raam ook van gebouw zelf gehaald. Het was hier dubbel getagd.
Museo delle Cere rsm (2020-07-08 08:33:55+00:00): manca vicino il simbolo la dicitura museo delle cere sulla cartina . il museo delle cere è in via lapicidi marini 17 cap 47890 San Marino. Stefanelli Giovanni del Museo delle Cere
ma-rt-in (2020-07-07 07:05:32+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe den Versorgungsweg von dir nochmals angepasst. Grund ist die von dir eingetragene Beschilderung. "delivery" stellt den Lieferverkehr dar und keinen Versorgungsverkehr. Den Versorgungsverkehr wäre zum Beispiel Müllabfuhr oder der Bauhof. 
vg
vorlif (2020-07-07 08:36:49+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Korrektur. Ich dachte, dass Wege für "Betriebs- und Versorgungsdienste" mit darunter fallen. 
vg
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-18 18:25:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746745497/history - jesteś pewien że to prawidłowa zmiana?

To na pewno barierka energochłonna?
BCNorwich (2020-07-11 08:00:30+00:00): Hi,
More duplications of major highway sections.
Way: 823423950, Way: 823423947 and Way: 823423942 placed on top of existing highway.

I've removed the duplicates.
VLD257 (2020-07-14 12:38:44+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for writing to us. This might have happened when I managed to resolve the conflicts but I will ensure to re-validate the data from next time.

Thanks for fixing it. 

Regards
Nurul
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-12 23:51:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727330613/history - jesteś pewien tych barierek energochłonnych?

Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3356960 ?
voltairovicz (2022-09-24 09:08:13+00:00): przecież jest już poprawione
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-24 09:11:52+00:00): bardzo cię przepraszam, rzeczywiście - nie wiem czemu się pomyliłem 

dzięki za poprawkę
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-24 09:20:34+00:00): Ale zauważ że 11 dni temu gdy komentowałem to poprawione jeszcze nie było
BeKri (2020-07-08 10:31:51+00:00): Danke fürs umsetzen
Happy tagging derBeKri
Frans S (2020-07-06 14:06:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:13:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
PT-53 (2020-10-20 07:18:26+00:00): Linien ohne Merkmale gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823465125/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823465135/history
PT-53 (2020-10-21 07:22:56+00:00): Eine weitere Linie ohne Merkmale gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823465135/history
stephankn (2020-07-08 09:46:17+00:00): please use English language and not Morse code for your comments.

We are a community and like to know what and why you mapped here. It is not helpful that you "editied many things". Try to give us a hint what was broken and why you modified it. Especially with large changes like these covering many Elements.
axelr (2020-07-07 08:31:29+00:00): Das Zerstückeln von Kreisverkehren ist in der Regel unnötig. 
Du wirst keinem Wanderer vorschreiben, ob rechts oder links um den Kreis gehen soll. Jeder router muss mit dem Kreisverkehr als Wegelement zurechtkommen.
Bei deiner Bearbeitung baust du viele Fehler in den anliegenden Busrouten ein (es sind ca 600 Fehler hinzugekommen) Das ist nicht nötig.
Ich werde dies heute abend korrigieren. 

Meine Bitte lass die Kreisverkehre geschlossen, wie sie sind. 

Hingegen ist das Aufteilen von Straßen meist unproblematisch (mit etwas Geschick werde keine Fahler erzeugt, und wenn doch sind diese leicht zu korrigieren.)
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-07 07:17:25+00:00): Ciao,
Benvenuto nella comunity di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovate tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

Ciao e ancora benvenuto in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
GOwin (2020-07-08 03:22:11+00:00): Good to see you back, editing again!
eggie (2020-07-06 14:46:43+00:00): Oke... en dan motor_vehicle=no  Die regel kan weg. 

Ik weet natuurlijk niet hoelang dat duurt hier. Het was maar een voorbeeld. Voor een korte periode zet ik vaak helemaal niets op slot omdat er meestal dan wel een omleidingsroute staat aangegeven.

MVG,
eggie
Meine Gegend (2021-08-05 19:45:42+00:00): Hi Joe,

IMHO an on the ground landuse shouldn't be replaced with zoning data.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
Collecting all the zoning information might be the worthwhile task for a dedicated project besides OSM.

Kind regards,
Thomas
kuchar222 (2020-07-06 14:29:39+00:00): jak dodać tą ścieżkę do warstwy rowerowej
freeExec (2020-07-06 16:23:46+00:00): Что-то я не понял чем это вызвано, воротам что ли? Но до ворот то вход свободный.
Владимир К (2020-07-06 16:48:01+00:00): ну да, воротами. ок. разрежу по воротам.
хм. а надо ли на куски до ворот ставить motor_vehicle=destination как и на улице, от которой они отходят?
freeExec (2020-07-06 17:19:39+00:00): По логике ка бы destination логичен и там, но зачем ты это делаешь, роутер и сам через ворота не пропустит.
Да и на ворота тогда запрет надо вешать, а то как-то странно, на воротах запрета нет, а на дороге есть.
tdiesel (2021-05-01 19:06:06+00:00): Hallo, ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Dieser Weg ist nach wie vor weder gesperrt noch rückgebaut. Um es allgemein zu sagen, bei OSM wird die aktuelle Realität gemappt und nicht eine Wahrscheinlichkeit in der Zukunft. Viele Grüße, tdiesel
ndm (2020-07-07 22:43:55+00:00): It's great that you reference your company website -- is there any discussion of this tagging on OSM mailing lists or on the OSM wiki -- if not I will remove the turn restriction since it isn't visible on the ground.
OlegKukharchik (2020-07-09 13:02:28+00:00): It's great that you make comment, but there are two options that make that maneure illegal - no U-turn sign (on Bing street-side ) and road markings whith area of chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right. If you know that maneure is legal please send references, thank you.
user_5359 (2020-07-07 15:49:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the newest version of https://www.osm.org/way/823480253
Frans S (2020-07-06 15:25:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Meersbrook (2020-07-09 08:47:02+00:00): Please do not change the T5 and T6 to tramway. The vehicles are road tyre vehicles on a road with a contactless guided rail.

Track type of T5 and T6: railway: tram attribute have been deleted. The T5 and 6 are a road vehicles with tires with a guide rail. This type of transport does not run on rails but on a roadway, concrete for the most part iirc.
It is important to correctly tag the modes of transport and not to generalise. A guided road vehicle must be tagged as guided busway, with or without a guide rail (the notion of guiding is important).
eggie (2020-07-06 15:28:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-08-14 08:18:52+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure about this, or is this another "joke" like turning Britanny into a river?  You've changed the bank here into a co-working space called "plasterboard"?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-08-14 08:19:21+00:00): Bonjour,
En êtes-vous sûr, ou est-ce une autre "blague" comme transformer la Bretagne en rivière ? Vous avez transformé la banque ici en un espace de co-working appelé « Gyproc » ?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
benoitdd (2021-08-26 15:29:19+00:00): BA13 Coworking does exist (https://www.ba13.fr/cgvcoworking), so it is probably a good edit. The only joke being their name (BA stands probably for Bassin d'Arcachon).
SomeoneElse (2021-08-26 15:32:55+00:00): @benoitdd - thanks!
Meersbrook (2020-07-09 08:26:54+00:00): Please do not change the T5 and T6 to tramway. The vehicles are road tyre vehicles on a road with a contactless guided rail.
jsteelz (2020-07-09 12:16:43+00:00): Right, I understand. Yet they are consistently and uniquely branded as tramways, operate as tramways, and all of the OSM stop entities for their routes are classified as tram stops.
Meersbrook (2020-07-09 12:21:46+00:00): TVR (Transport en Voie Réservée) have stops marked as railway=tram_stop, you're right. There is no intermediate tag between bus_stop and tram_stop, though, both are obsolete, they shold be public_transport=stop then the vehicles marked, in this case trolleybus=yes.

You have hit the nail though, they are branded as trams but they are not trams... We have many different tags to differeciate things, even if RATP wanted to save money with buses on segregated carriageways, they're still not trams. What some editors do is edit for the render, which means they see a blue line and think it's wrong, it's just a tag that differenciates a vehicle on rails and another on tyres. Take care!
user_5359 (2020-07-07 15:31:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/823489560/history: Why did you add different keys twice (a second time with an additional x)?
user_5359 (2020-07-06 17:31:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-07 05:42:00+00:00): Don't forget `crossing=no` where it applies
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87608786
Kovoschiz (2020-07-07 05:42:16+00:00): You also need to extend the crosswalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87608786
eggie (2020-07-06 15:32:07+00:00): Oke Grensie.. weg is weg... DE source:date	=2014-03-24
had je kunnen laten staan.
Die hoort bij de import vanuit de BAG.

MVG,
Eggie
disc24 (2020-10-12 06:48:45+00:00): Hi,
ich habe an der Stelle der abgebundenen Straße mal einen temporären Fuß-/Radweg eingebaut. Damit werden zumindest noch Fußgänger und Radfahrer durch die Baustelle geroutet. Muss dann nach Beendigung der Baumaßnahme wieder entfernt werden.
Frans S (2020-07-07 13:06:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. 31 out of 92 mapped buildings are not fair squared
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
pio2_122 (2020-07-11 16:09:05+00:00): Niezbyt fajnie jest usuwać urzędowo nadane adresy z komentarzem w postaci "."...
Wandalizm wycofany.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87609453
vmiklos (2020-07-06 17:27:13+00:00): Tipp: old_name alá felveheted a régi nevet, hogy a kereső azt is megtalálja. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
Arun Madhavan (2020-07-06 16:11:43+00:00): just wondering y u deleted it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87609465
stephankn (2020-07-23 20:23:51+00:00): Please document import. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70103
stephankn (2020-07-23 21:26:41+00:00): node 7688192100
โรงพยาบาลสรรพสิทธิประสงค์

looks like a duplicate to already existing hospital nearby node 3326559851 
โรงพยาบาลสรรพสิทธิประสงค์
whb (2020-07-07 08:38:25+00:00): Guten Tag,
darf der Weg zumindest an dessen Anfang und Ende wirklich nicht betreten werden?
https://osm.org/go/0DYqAQgtc--?m=
https://osm.org/go/0DN~V6Ubm?m=
Immerhin verbindet dieser Waldwege miteinander. Ist der Weg an dessen Anfang und Ende wirklich kein breiter Waldweg?
eggie (2020-07-06 16:41:09+00:00): Top!  Het was overigens geen ramp :)
eggie (2020-07-06 16:39:40+00:00): Dag BeerFonny... Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
Ook de aard van het bedrijk hoort erbij. Dan zal pas de naam renderen en een symbool verschijnen.

bv amenity=cafe

MVG,
Eggie
Fons de Beer (2020-07-06 16:45:29+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Bedankt voor je aanvullende commentaar.'
Groet,
Fonny
PLima785 (2020-07-08 09:59:38+00:00): Bom dia e obrigado pelas edições mas vou ter que pedir que uses as imagens de satélite mais recentes para evitar equívocos.
Podes consultar aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Uso_de_Imagens#Imagens_sat.C3.A9lite_em_Portugal.
Para mais ajudas temos um canal no telegram:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
Pedro Lima
Cascafico (2020-07-07 09:04:41+00:00): Hai appiccicato landuse=residential ad una footway, rendendo difficile l'edit di entrambe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87609919
user_11166885 (2020-07-07 11:04:31+00:00): Ciao. Voglio essere sincero. Al posto di lamentarti di quello che faccio io potresti rispondere alle mie note relative all'ingresso di Via dell'Istria del Cimitero di Sant'Anna al posto di lamentarti inutilmente, visto che io sto facendo delle cose che sono relativamente accettate dalle regole di openstreetmap.org.

Cordiali saluti
-Giorgio D.
user_5359 (2020-07-06 17:25:23+00:00): Hello! Please use building=yes instead buldings=yes.
maposm (2020-07-11 16:16:47+00:00): Hallo HSchulze und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Hier fehlen noch einige Angaben, um dieses Windrad korrekt in OSM als solches zu kennzeichnen [1]:
generator:source=wind
generator:method=wind_turbine
generator:type=horizontal_axis

Außerdem hat das Windrad vermutlich keinen (Eigen-)Namen, und erst recht heißt es nicht "Stromgenerator". Das solltest du wieder entfernen. Vielleicht kennst du eine (Referenz-)Nummer, die könntest du als ref=* eintragen.

Viele Grüße
maposm

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:method%3Dwind_turbine
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-07 07:16:34+00:00): Ciao,
Benvenuti nella comunity di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovate tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

In questa modifica ho visto che avete rimosso un elemento, serve perà prestare attenzione a cosa questo indica, avete giustamente indicato che era riportato due volte, ma in reltà solamente erano due elementi diversi con lo stesso nome. Uno è una scuola l'altro era un centro giovanile. Le due cose sono separate? se si vi posso spiegare come ripristinare questo.

Ciao e ancora benvenuti in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
puzzlr (2020-07-30 21:25:51+00:00): Can you explain the point of adding all these side trails? They aren't readily visible in the satellite imagery. I realize it's mostly open meadow and one can walk almost anywhere.
Mohammad Alagna (2020-12-20 16:05:36+00:00): حبيشان لك تعديل من الوادي الابيض لاودي القهازه
منطقة تبوك السعوديه

التعديل غير صحيح
ارحوا عدم التعديل اذا لم تكن متأكد
حبيشان (2020-12-21 17:11:00+00:00): لا يوجد هذا التعديل الذي ذكرته

أنا أضفت الاسم الإنجليزي من قاعدة بيانات gns فقط، راجع سجل التعديلات 

ثم تعديلات غير منضبطة على قواعد osm أرجو منك قراءة الويكي وصفحة السعودية في الويكي
Abdullah Salem 12034 (2021-03-24 18:05:36+00:00): جبل الشواحط
Pt873 (2020-07-06 21:54:34+00:00): Olá. A alça adicionada para fazer o retorno na Av. Carlos Cunha não existe.
felipeeugenio (2020-07-17 23:12:11+00:00): Estimado. Building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Ya está arreglado en todo caso.

Saludos