piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2022-12-12 08:46:38+00:00): It is longer than a pedestrian island, and is probably one of the earliest modal filters in OSM having existed for 13 years. This deletion should be reverted to preserve history. 
It can be adjusted to look better if necessary but has always been correct.
Eliiia (2022-12-12 08:49:48+00:00): Alright, fair enough. How would I revert it?
trigpoint (2022-12-12 08:52:27+00:00): JackW's addition of motor_vehicle=designated is certainly wrong and should be removed.
trigpoint (2022-12-12 09:42:24+00:00): With josm, select the existing way and then revert selection and restore deleted objects. I can do it if you want or give it a go yourself.
Eliiia (2022-12-12 15:06:17+00:00): Ill give it a go when I'm back home
trigpoint (2022-12-12 15:11:19+00:00): I have fixed it.

I also removed the motor vehicle=designated which was added by JackW as that had made it routeable for cars.
trapicki (2022-12-14 11:57:59+00:00): Du könntest die Änderungsbeschreibung noch verbessern. "diverse selbsterklärend Optimierungen" erklärt direkt nix. Da muss man dann hineinschauen, was du konkret gemacht hast, und um uns das zu ersparen könntest du eine kleine Beschreibung hinzufügen, z.B. "AT Salzburt Straßwalchen Am Kolm: Adressen Häuser 2, 4, 6 korrigiert." 

Das ist wie Schachteln beschriften: Was tust du mit einer Beschriftung wie: "diverses wichtiges und unwichtiges Zeugs, wirst schon sehen wenn du hinein schaust"?
lllllllIIIIIllll (2023-02-07 05:55:32+00:00): Добрый день.
Заметил на точках Белсоюзпечать добавлены теги name:en=Белсаюздрук.
Возможно это ошибка скрипта при миграции. Мне кажется, стоит приверить скрипты и уже внесенные с их помощью изменения.
С уважением.
tbicr (2023-02-07 12:50:55+00:00): Вітаю, дзякуй за заўвагу, дадавалася рукамі, прабраў
CoyKoi (2023-03-01 09:19:54+00:00): Hey StenSoft, this location for the Ponsonby place node feels awkward - it's too close to the boundary with Freemans Bay and St Marys (based on post codes/ FENZ localities/local knowledge). Do you mind if I move it back to its previous location south-west over the top of the community centre? That's also closer to the NZGB location for Ponsonby.
https://data.linz.govt.nz/x/GSauWr
NyanSten (2023-03-03 00:21:36+00:00): Hi, generally place points in OSM should be somewhere what you'd consider the perceived centre (like a square or a central monument, or in case of Ponsonby I'd say that's where the shops are) so that it's possible to navigate to that point. NZGB has different rules for the placement where it prefers the geographic centre on their maps.

But if you think that the centre of Ponsonby is more around the community center then it's fine to move it. Or you can add an administrative boundary relation to map the boundaries, then OSM will show the boundary when searching for Ponsonby.
CoyKoi (2023-03-04 23:53:35+00:00): Thanks for taking the time, I appreciate it. I think in the case of Ponsonby (like many suburbs) it's impossible to pinpoint a single perceived centre - and I accept people are likely to differ on this - but I do think that the location over the community centre building at 20 Ponsonby Terrace provides a nice balance representing the centre of "Ponsonby the residential suburb to the west of Ponsonby Rd, north of Richmond Rd", and "Ponsonby the retail/commercial strip along Ponsonby Road". And it does help it's the location of the Ponsonby Community Centre building.

So yes I will move it back there now, but I will try stop considering geographical centres and cartographic labelling when working with place nodes - I appreciate the logic for using perceived centres as best practice.

Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
felipeeugenio (2022-12-12 11:21:05+00:00): Hola Bruno. No es necesario agregar restricciones de giro en lugares que, por sentido de circulación, no se puede. Es superfluo.
Por otro lado, no agregar restricciones sobre la misma vía. No tienen sentido.
Yo lo arreglo.
santamariense (2022-12-16 15:11:59+00:00): Sabe se existe, ou mesmo já existiu balsa aqui [1]?
Se sim, é só para pedestres ou pode veículos também?
Nas imagens de satélite não é possível ver qualquer balsa neste local.

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201799049
PheMS (2022-12-16 19:35:12+00:00): Boa tarde! Liguei na Prefeitura de Piracicaba pra obter esta informação. A balsa existia, mas foi desativada depois que a Ponte do Canal Torto foi construída. Portanto, não existe mais a balsa neste local. Farei a alteração.
santamariense (2022-12-16 23:06:46+00:00): Perfeito! Obrigado e parabéns pela celeridade e iniciativa de resolver a questão com a astúcia, certamente foi uma excelente ideia contatar a prefeitura local.
little_maper (2022-12-12 10:22:18+00:00): Hello K1u9r8d9;
I see you changed the classification for this street from "highway=tertiary" to "highway=tertiary_link" and it's not suitable in this segment.
Link for the street:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/478154063
Also, you changed many "junction=roundabout" in the classification to "_link" and it's against the rules in the OpenStreetMap
Examples for the streets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894651312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888707627
For more information about the classification in Wiki OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
More information about the classification for "junction=roundabout"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag
Could you check these and fixed them, please?
Regards
little_maper
ڕاستی (2022-12-12 23:40:28+00:00): سڵاو K1u9r8d9
دەکرێ بزانم بە چ هۆکارێک جۆری ڕووپۆشی ئەم شەقامەت کە قیڕە سڕیوەتەوە. بە ئەرک نەبێت وەڵامێکی درووستی ئەم کارەت بدەوە.
لەگەڵ ڕێزی زۆرم.

Hello K1u9r8d9. Why did you delete the surface: asphalt. What is wrong with that tag. Please respond.
Regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129980625
felipeeugenio (2022-12-12 11:16:55+00:00): Hola Bruno. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos en las cosas. El que lo estés poniendo entre parentesis ya es raro.
Además de Los Notros se usa otro nombre? entonces usar alt_name= o old_name.
Ayer le pusiste (viejo) al puente y te lo corrigieron, Si tienes dudas por favor preguntar.

Por otro lado, si el puente es de verdad conocido con un nombre, está bien ponerlo en name=, pero si no; va con bridge:name=. Hablemos por el chat.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129980635
emersonveenstra (2022-12-12 12:27:49+00:00): Hi,

Please don't delete features like fairways if you're just going to recreate the same thing. That is not fair to the person who originally made the fairway, since you're removing the work they put into it for no reason. Thanks!
Glenedjam (2022-12-13 15:16:54+00:00): No disrespect, but correlating features with lidar data requires much more precision than what is there.  Many adjustments are needed. Easier to remove and remap.  Thanks for your concern.
Ydel (2022-12-12 01:46:07+00:00): -> Tréguennec
dpolovinkin (2025-08-31 06:57:39+00:00): добрый день! эх, просто обратить внимание, что изза того что вы тут так много территорий размапили мультиполигонами с членствами и отношениями - насколько потом это сложно как либо менять, с мультиполигонами даже границу у одной зоны поменять целое дело

вот даже просто этот.. "объект" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9382293#map=14/43.45099/43.57029 - какой вообще был смысл в одну сущность это запихивать?)..
highflyer74 (2022-12-13 12:26:10+00:00): Moin!

Hier ist etwas schief gelaufen:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.54520&lat=53.09503&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Um das etwas übersichtlicher zu gestalten, würde ich dir empfehlen, deine Änderungssätze etwas kleiner zu machen. Vielleicht wäre es auch einen Versuch wert, mit JOSM zu arbeiten, denn der verhindert solche Fehler durch Warnungen ziemlich zuverlässig.

Falls du Hilfe beim Reparieren brauchst, melde dich gern!
Claudius Henrichs (2022-12-12 16:00:12+00:00): Hi,
Busan metro line 4 infrastructure is called metro/subway but actually in OSM tagging a rubber-tyred monorail / automated people mover (APM). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monorail for the description on the rubber-tyred APM
What's your motiviation to tag it as light_rail?
saori_ (2022-12-13 08:17:05+00:00): Sorry about my fault.
motivation was that i know BML4 is light rail, so i think i had to edit BML4 to light_rail.
Actually i didnt know about that line has to be tagged a rubber-tyred monorail. I will edit BML4 to monorail as soon as possible.
sorry for all.
salisburymistake (2022-12-12 04:38:13+00:00): Kinda put a lot of work into mapping the 3D parts of the Myers Building - https://i.imgur.com/DbUCTwa.png. Any particular reason you deleted them?
DrDisaster (2022-12-12 11:43:32+00:00): Sorry. I am not familiar with 3D techniques and didn’t realize that’s what it was for. 

Now to figure out how to undo it…
DrDisaster (2022-12-12 11:49:24+00:00): I’ve never seen anything this advanced before.  I have a lot to learn.
salisburymistake (2022-12-12 15:31:57+00:00): Hey, no worries. My #1 rule with mapping is that if I don't understand it, I leave it alone until I do. I've been doing this nearly 7 years and I'm still afraid to touch bus route relations! Similarly, I've never had to revert anything before either, which is why I'm going to reach out to the OSM US Slack and see if someone there can do it so I don't screw it up.

Anyway, it's nice to see someone else editing the Springfield area. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have questions or need help with anything!
DrDisaster (2022-12-12 16:23:40+00:00): I'm here on business and got bored.  You've done amazing things that my hometown map pale in comparison.  I will be using this area as a reference to how to do it there.
salisburymistake (2022-12-12 17:15:58+00:00): That's very kind of you to say. I did reach out to the OSM US Slack and figured out how to use the reverter plugin in JOSM to revert the changeset. I re-added the MaryFlor restaurant. Also, I saw you tried to put the building parts back so I removed them since mine are back. Everything should be fixed now, and hey, now I know how to revert changesets! Learn something new every day. :)
muralito (2022-12-12 19:58:49+00:00): Buenisimo, pero si se habilita "dentro de poco", tendrias que esperar para mapearla asi hasta que se habilita. :-)
vicente lopez 2021 (2022-12-22 22:51:48+00:00): yase habilito me podes corregir porfa  la zona de la rotonda de ruta 58 pasando  ruta 16 sobre la ruta 58  hacia caning
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_11609320 (2022-12-12 04:09:53+00:00): STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE - SHC
DIVISION 1. STATE HIGHWAYS [50 - 897]  ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )  
CHAPTER 2. The State Highway System [230 - 635]  ( Chapter 2 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )  

ARTICLE 3. The State Highway Routes [300 - 635]  ( Article 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 385. )
  
366.  
(a) Route 66 is from:

(1) Route 210 near San Dimas to the eastern city limit of the City of Pomona.

(2) The eastern city limit of the City of Rialto to Route 215 in San Bernardino.

(b) The relinquished former portions of Route 66 within the city limits of the Cities of Claremont, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland are not state highways and are not eligible for adoption under Section 81
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
impiaaa (2022-12-12 19:59:25+00:00): I think lanes=1 would be better than either oneway=yes or narrow=yes
minighost (2022-12-12 20:09:59+00:00): That makes sense to me. I'll update. (Lots of routing makes use of this narrow road (barely big enough for a single sedan) whereas Copper Road is 2 wide lanes and never used. It causes so much confusion.
pza (2023-01-19 08:55:49+00:00): Reverted by 131454456. This update is based off old imagery.  Accurate survey based updates were made recently in 125920421, 125337580. More to come this weekend with the latest traffic changes.
nevw (2022-12-13 00:34:27+00:00): Hi
private mining company tracks should not be deleted. You should add access tags instead. Maybe access=private is most suitable. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Any gates on the tracks also also need mapping.
nevw (2022-12-13 00:43:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Kerry Neighbour (2022-12-13 01:41:42+00:00): no worries. Seems a good policy. Thanks for the info
Kai Johnson (2023-01-01 17:01:32+00:00): I noticed that you changed the name of a segment of I-8 from Ocean Beach Freeway to Mission Valley Freeway. The official designation of Ocean Beach Freeway extends the name all the way to I-5. (See https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/place-names/web-2020-named-freeways-final-a11y.pdf) Was there a reason that you switched the name west of I-5?
OrdinaryScarlett (2023-01-01 19:58:41+00:00): My apologies, I was mistaken. Thanks for letting me know!
Kai Johnson (2023-01-02 14:20:39+00:00): No problem! I was just wondering if there might have been some signage to indicate the name change before I-5.
3HUW3BRU3C (2022-12-12 05:52:40+00:00): Thanks
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:26:54+00:00): 534731418, 548708178 maxspeed correct
Ramps not surveyed Nov 2025, but likely to reduce speed at top part of ramp
MxxCon (2022-12-14 02:18:27+00:00): Hello.
This edit is invalid.
This information is already recorded using tag payment:insurance_plans=yes
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129985727
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-18 05:50:21+00:00): OSM是一张真实存在的地图，请不要将其当作一个游乐场，您的胡乱编辑已被回退，继续捣乱会被封号
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129985775
Bienson (2022-12-20 19:56:15+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe deine Änderungen (dieser Changeset + https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129986100) revertieren lassen, da du alle Gebäude(-teile) gelöscht hast.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130065579
literan (2022-12-12 19:38:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10255013287

диапазоны квартир указываются через точку с запятой и без пробелов. Исправлю
Warin61 (2022-12-13 01:35:13+00:00): Hi,

Yer .. that Park relation will not 'work'. 
First each member of the relation needs a 'role', 'inner' or 'outer'. 

Second ... the Way: 83407591    "landuse"="farmyard" is a problem as it presently causes the boundary of the Park to cross itself - that is not on. I'd 'cheat' and make the Park boundary not cross itself by extending it a few meters to fully enclose the farmland or retract the Park boundary a few meters so it does not full enclose the farmland.. your choice.
Warin61 (2022-12-30 23:39:30+00:00): Still broken. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.88180&lat=-37.59447&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2023-01-19 23:12:10+00:00): Still broken...
Andrew Parker (2023-01-22 06:37:47+00:00): I have tried my best to correct the issue. Can you have a look and see if I have done it right?
Warin61 (2023-01-22 07:34:15+00:00): That would 'work' .. if the relation members had roles .. 'outers'. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14979222
Of the 3 listed ways only the first one has a role. 

------------------- Using Vicmap Lite Public lands as a reference has some additional intrusions. Might be best to add those? 

Sorry for any annoyance.
Frans S (2023-02-01 16:34:47+00:00): Hello
 Thanks for mapping here.
You missed quite a lot of paths/roads. In particular, you did not connect incoming pats/roads from adjacent tasks. 
There are also a number of residential areas which need to be mapped.
Please take also a look which taggings to be used.
A trace connecting a settlement with farmland is just a track. Not an unclassified highway.. Traces going through over a longer distance are not to be tagged as track, except when they just connect settlements with farmland.



How to measure the width of a trace In Ideditor:
Command Ctr+shift+M  shows measuring dimensions
after that command, select add line.
You can read the value in the measurement tab. (select Metric value)
<2 mtr tag it Path
> 2 mtr tag it unclassified, residential or track depending on the situation.
See the wiki African highways to decide which tag to be used.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Best regards
UPegasus (2022-12-12 11:31:19+00:00): Please stop posting vandalism! Learn first.
little_maper (2022-12-14 09:07:04+00:00): Hello Lamassu;
I see you add many links that do not exist in any satellite image and the classification for these links is wrong according to the rule for OpenStreetMap
Could you provide us with the source you added to these links?
Examples
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121155557/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082479828/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121155559/history
Regards
little_maper
user_12523467 (2022-12-14 09:21:20+00:00): Hello little_maper,
 
the satellite imagery in Iraq are outdated by approximately 3 months.
we don't depend on satellite imagery when we add new features, we depend on our local knowledge.

keep that in mind, when you update on OSM in Iraq with #digitalegypt.

we had the same problem with Iranain editors, who kept deleting features that they don't see it on satellite imagery.

best regards
little_maper (2022-12-14 12:22:34+00:00): Hi Lamassu;
Thank you for responding and I got this point.
But the links you added its wrong in the classification it should be "tertiary_link"
For more information on knowing the classification in OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
Examples of links that need to fix:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121155557/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082479828/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121155559/history
Regards
little_maper
kucai (2023-03-03 16:40:49+00:00): How is this way 540210494 classified as a track? It's clearly paved. 

Camne pulak jalan bertar ni jadi track?
mataharimau (2023-03-07 06:21:35+00:00): My bad. The highway originated from a farmland, and I did not notice it extended all the way into the city.
Msiipola (2022-12-18 13:16:42+00:00): Hej! I det här området har du adderat flera spår. Tyvärr har flera av dessa överlagrats på gamla spår/stigar, vilket är fel. Jag rättar felen, men tänk på detta när du ritar nya spår/stigar.
Mvh Markku
tastrax (2023-02-03 04:22:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dodko (2022-12-12 16:02:38+00:00): Otváracie hodiny zapíšte presne podľa dokumentácie, inak si s tým aplikácie neporadia.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Jednoduchá pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
eggie (2022-12-12 08:53:54+00:00): Dag Maxotic,
Je vraagt feedback..
In ieder geval actueler hier.  
Kijk even hier wat er nog meer bij hoort.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129988287

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-12-12 09:29:10+00:00): Witaj, wygląda na to że nie dodałeś żadnych tagów które opisałyby specyfikę tego miejsca. Tak jak do opisywania sklepu spożywczego używamy shop=convenience, tak tutaj trzeba użyć zapewne jakiegoś tagu office (standardowe dla firm).

Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Samo dodanie nazwy nie jest dobrym sposobem oznaczenia. W edytorze iD możesz łatwo wyszukiwać wszelakie rodzaje punktów, po wybraniu swojego punktu i zmiany jego rodzaju na samej górze panelu po lewej stronie.

Pozdrawiam!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 13:48:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2009534990/history has ID = BI_0001 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
eggie (2022-12-12 08:49:35+00:00): Dag Maxotic,
Je hebt De Sillesstraat verwijderd. 
Zo routeert het niet meer voor voetgangers. Ik heb je vlak losgemaakt van de landuse = residential. Daarom zo'n groot editgebied.
Ik heb er een voetgangersgebied van gemaakt. highway=pedestrian.. area=yes
Met een lijnelement  highay=pedestrain voor de routering.
Het bos heb ik weggehaald. 
Mogen hier geen auto's meer komen.
Hoe zit het met dat eenrichtingverkeer op dat overgebleven stuk? Staat het kunstwerk er nog? 
De recyclepunten heb ik opgeschoven conform de laatste luchtfoto. 

Mijn edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129989617

en

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129989877

Laat maar weten...  Het zal vast nog wel anders zijn.  Mijn edits zijn zo terug te draaien.



MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-12 08:50:34+00:00): Je eigen edits Je eigen edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129988665
eggie (2022-12-12 08:56:49+00:00): .. en de straatnaam kan er nog op.
jb54osm (2022-12-13 11:22:58+00:00): Ik zal er vanmiddag eens langs fietsen.
eggie (2022-12-13 11:54:45+00:00): ahh .. kijk...   dan komt het goed. :)