piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
epigen108 (2026-02-07 15:15:46+00:00): Ich hatte mir vorhin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930572261 vor Ort angeschaut wegen dem alten fixme dort. Ein water=pond ist dort nicht rechtfertigbar (siehe auch Foto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5158423 ). Ich fände natural=wetland besser, in Anlehnung an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112168082
blackboxlogic (2021-04-15 14:46:07+00:00): Thanks for adding this building! There was a node with address details before your change and you included those same address details in your (much nicer) building. When you do this, please delete the address node because it is made redundant by your building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102914712
blackboxlogic (2021-04-15 14:46:31+00:00): (for clarity, I'm referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7215336982)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102914712
pabi12 (2021-04-16 04:07:13+00:00): corrected!!
ToniE (2021-04-14 14:16:36+00:00): Servus jnk0,

> Add via to name

Sollte eher umgekehrt sein. In 'name' steht nur dann ein 'über' (mittels '=>'), wenn es zur Unterscheidung von anderen Varianten notwendig ist.

'name' sollte aber so wenige '=>' wie möglich haben.

Wenn dann dennoch mehr als ein '=>' in 'name' drin ist, so müssen diese (und nur diese) so ingeklammerten 'über' in 'via' rein, als ';' (ohne Blanks) separierte Liste.

'name' wäre hier also zunächst rein formal:

Bus 66: Nieder-Olm, Schulzentrum => Zornheim => Mainz-Altstadt, Brückenplatz

da 'über' deutsch ist und nicht von jedem Datenauswerter verstanden wird.

'name' mit '=> Zornheim =>' drin ist auch logisch richtig, da es eine alternative Linie mit selbem Start/Ziel gibt.

So steht's in PTv2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726

PTNA ist nicht das Maß aller Dinge (auch wenn ich es geschrieben habe), sondern obiges "approved proposal" in der oben genannten Version.

PTNA ist gegenüber PTv2 etwas strenger, erwartet 'optionale' Dinge, weil sie für andere Tools sinnvoll sind.

Gruß,
Toni
jnk0 (2021-04-14 14:31:59+00:00): Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe tatsächlich vorhin kurz überlegt, wie der Hinweis von PTNA gemeint ist und mich dann leider von dem deutschsprachigen Hinweis mit "über" fehlleiten lassen.

Ich korrigiere das wieder.
skquinn (2021-04-14 08:44:37+00:00): Oops, didn't add web searches to sources.
gscholz (2021-04-27 05:04:38+00:00): Hi  islami_m,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

 http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-47.18978&lat=-23.09049&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As youn probably know these can not be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-14 09:57:22+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Tvenkinys žymimas landuse=reservoir. iD redaktorius yra labai prastas ir siūlo neteisingus dalykus - nereikia klausyti jokių jo „patarimų“. Sėkmės!
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-05-28 06:48:20+00:00): Hallo Jenseman79,

willkommen bei OSM! :-)

Hier hast Du nun lediglich eine zusätzliche ("leere") Linie parallel zum vorhandenen Waldweg eingezeichnet.

Ist der Waldweg auf diesem Streckenabschnitt zugewachsen? Ist da auch zu Fuß kein Durchkommen mehr?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Jenseman79 (2021-05-28 12:11:59+00:00): Moin, 
anscheinend muss ich mich mal mit OSM auseinandersetzen, damit ich es das nächste Mal richtig ausführe! 
Nach meiner Einschätzung ist da auch zu Fuß kein Durchkommen 
Gruß der Jenseman
Kovoschiz (2021-04-14 09:10:41+00:00): Please don't change `=uncontrollled` to `=marked`. They are ambiguous.
gendy54 (2021-12-20 21:01:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag landuse=village_green me semble un peu tiré par les cheveux pour désigner l'herbe du parc de la Victoire de Millau.
petrovsk (2021-12-29 14:40:23+00:00): Bonjour, je l'ai changée en landuse=grass, peut-être plus réaliste. N'hésitez pas à corriger si besoin.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:02:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
maraf24 (2021-04-14 10:12:49+00:00): Hej
Przyrwa nie jest rzeką, ale potokiem/strugą.
NiechŻyjeLordKondzi (2021-04-14 11:50:53+00:00): Potok/struga to nie strumień.
maraf24 (2021-04-14 12:18:20+00:00): Co to ma do rzeczy? Rzeka to na pewno nie jest.
NiechŻyjeLordKondzi (2021-04-14 15:36:06+00:00): Strumień też nie. Ale dobra, niech Ci będzie
maraf24 (2021-04-14 18:59:15+00:00): Potok to strumień na terenie o dużym pochyleniu. Struga to niewielki ciek na płaskim terenie. Żadne z nich nie jest rzeką.
W OSM strumienie, potoki i strugi oznaczane są jako  "waterway=stream".
W innych językach niż polski są inne określania i inne podziały i tam też trzeba je wtłoczyć w istniejące w OSM tagi.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-14 09:29:46+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`.
eggie (2021-04-14 19:16:45+00:00): Dag AP...  Dit was je edit...  
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102918351
Best lastig al die landuse. Het zou eigenlijk netjes moeten aansluiten. Nu zitten er nog ongetagd witte vlakken tussen. 
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-14 19:29:51+00:00): Even wat hersteld hier.... Moet natuurlijk wel oke zijn zo naast het huis van Mr GPS :)
MVG
eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-27 22:15:14+00:00): its not living_street! why did you change it?
osmviborg (2021-04-14 10:05:37+00:00): Hvad er formålet?
osmviborg (2021-04-14 12:14:33+00:00): Rahbek's Vinhandel bor ikke på Godthåbsvej 2, adressen findes ikke. Du har fundet adressen på firmaets kontrolrapport. At lave fake adresser på den baggrund er forkert. Firmaet bor på Ørnevej 33, 7600 Struer.
osmviborg (2021-04-14 12:32:41+00:00): Det samme gør sig gældende  for Børnehaven Myretuen, Vindfløjen 1, 
9380 Vestbjerg. På aula.dk bruger børnehaven deres rigtige adresse, som er Vindfløjen 3.
Jørn-osm (2021-04-14 21:45:55+00:00): Er en adresse forkert eller mangler, skal der rettes henvendelse til kommunen.
autoAWS bot importer den så fra Danmarks Adresseregister.

Denne adresse er tidligere blevet slettet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/343984377/history
b-holdet (2021-04-15 07:25:49+00:00): Hvis Niels tager data direkte fra Smiley Ordningen, så ser det ud som om at Rahbek's Vinhandel har ligget på denne nu udgået adresse i 2018.

https://www.findsmiley.dk/Sider/Search.aspx?k=Rahbek%27s%20Vinhandel

Om man kan sammenholde data fra FVST med AWS ved jeg ikke.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2021-04-20 14:14:58+00:00): Rakbæk vin skriver selv:

http://www.rahbek-vin.dk/

==
Ørnevej 33, 7600 Struer http://www.findsmiley.dk/746353

Lageret, Godthåbsvej 2, Struer https://www.findsmiley.dk/Sider/Search.aspx?k=godth%C3%A5bsvej%202%2C%20struer
==

CVR har registreret Børnehaven Myretuen på Vindfløjen 1
https://datacvr.virk.dk/data/visenhed?enhedstype=produktionsenhed&id=1003385826
Jørn-osm (2021-04-20 20:49:33+00:00): Prøv at skifte mellem 2005 og 2008. Bygning er fjernet.
https://sdfekort.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=783&mapwidth=1225&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfekort&selectorgroups=gst-hist-grundkort+matrikelkort+dhm&layers=theme-gst-orto_sommer_2005+theme-gst-orto_sommer_2008&opacities=1+1&mapext=475025.7182191058+6260828.548721815+475395.5523216647+6261064.393747873&maprotation=

Her ses ikke nogen ny bygning i 2019.
https://skraafoto.kortforsyningen.dk/oblivisionjsoff/index.aspx?project=denmark&id=DJQSEY

Kan vi blive enige om der ikke er en bygning nu?
SomeoneElse (2021-06-06 10:58:48+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that you'd fixed the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64764741 . Previously the truck extended further south - I've restored this now.  You can check historical data using overpass, in this case:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bdate%3A%222020-06-01T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%5D%3B%0Away(799757507)%3B%0Aout%20geom%3B%0A&C=-25.80933;28.23258;16

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-06-06 12:08:22+00:00): s/truck/trunk, obvously
willisturm (2021-06-08 15:33:57+00:00): Hi Andy
I only edited the highway-tags with 2 values. There was "highway=trunk;motorway". In recent months, I have corrected many mistakes according to taginfo.openstreetmap.org.
Have a nice day,
Willi
BAK365 (2021-04-14 14:50:24+00:00): Du hast bei der Relation Via Alpina Etappe 01 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12359032/history das fixme-tag entfernt. Es bleibt aber noch einiges zu fixen, siehe http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=12359032&noCache=true&_noCache=on.

Dies als Ergänzung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102864338.
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-16 05:47:43+00:00): Hello, (than_mayee) I modified the geometry of this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/930600332) based on Maxar's image because it is crossing with the waterbody'

Thankyou
canfe (2021-04-15 08:05:14+00:00): Ma le case son abitate? sennò bisogna lasciare locality.
andgiors (2021-04-15 08:07:22+00:00): Si, in entrambe le borgate ci sono residenti (io in una di quelle....)
canfe (2021-04-15 08:09:43+00:00): Ho dei dubbi sulla grafia: l'apostrofo sta per un'elisione. Casa che diventa Ca'
andgiors (2021-04-15 08:12:53+00:00): anche Ivo mi ha suggerito questa cosa, vi ringrazio entrambi. ho corretto il nodo creato in Cadrò, il toponimo riportato sulla segnaletica comunale
Wulfmorn (2021-04-14 13:19:38+00:00): Oh dear, that was an unfortunate mistake. Thank you :)
Rom1 (2021-04-14 20:03:15+00:00): Bonjour, le tag phone est tout à fait correct mais ce serait possible de garder le tag contact:phone pour être homogène avec les autres tags contact: ? Merci par avance.
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-15 11:41:01+00:00): Bonjour Rom1, 
Jj'ai effectué ces modifications car le territoire des Landes travaille actuellement sur de la contribution sur des éléments pour une la création d'une carte tourstique. Pour pouvoir faire remonter la donnée, nous avons besoin que tous les descriptifs soient concordants avec nos requêtes. Pour l'émément contact:phone, il est vrai, pourra être utilisé comme clef ;)
bonne journée
Rom1 (2021-04-15 11:47:29+00:00): Bonjour, si ce n'est pas trop demandé, pourriez-vous re-faire la correction dans le sens inverse ? Merci et bonne continuation.
मानचित्रकार (2021-05-01 23:40:39+00:00): is "republic of danda" an actual/official name of this city?
Monumental610 (2021-05-08 11:35:48+00:00): pretty sure it isnt , it should probably be at the locality or max at the suburb level
मानचित्रकार (2021-05-09 00:59:34+00:00): If you search on the internet you will find an Instagram page by this name. I couldn’t find anything else so this seems like illegitimate name.
Monumental610 (2021-05-09 08:12:05+00:00): removed it since even the insta page lists the place as Khar danda Koliwada
Cristoffs (2021-04-15 20:05:31+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś piekarnie?
Czadzik2 (2021-04-19 07:04:14+00:00): Bo jej już nie ma :)
Dimacn (2021-04-14 11:00:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Свои личные метки храните пожалуйста у себя в навигаторе/карте. В общий OSM такое не надо добавлять.
dorofeevskiy (2021-04-14 11:10:36+00:00): Это не личные метки, а общеизвестное место, где местные собирают грибы. Взято оно с социальных сетей, где люди делятся локациями.
Dimacn (2021-04-14 11:34:00+00:00): Вы нарушаете: 1. Вы добавили объект лес поверх уже существующего леса. 2. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name 3. Карта OSM - карта реально существующих объектов, которые любой желающий может верифицировать. Грибные места не подпадают под требования OSM. Личные отметки вашей соцсети, храните её у себя в сети.
Dimacn (2021-04-14 16:44:03+00:00): Кстати, вы можете использовать онлайн сервис umap.openstreetmap.fr/ru/ чтобы отмечать грибные поля для всех.
user_5359 (2021-04-18 07:38:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/427469703: What is the meaning of
roof:shape=gabled=2014
start_dateroof:colour=#6D6968
pittrichimica (2021-04-18 08:09:33+00:00): Typefoutje verholpen, bedankt.
A67-A67 (2021-04-14 21:49:56+00:00): I assume 'Slusa' is the Latin name of Sluis, not Oostburg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3122855232
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:17:17+00:00): Yes sorry my bad I corrected it
Ludhiana (2021-04-15 12:39:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12580305 is incomplete. Please upload landuses a real mapper would do.
impiaaa (2021-04-14 14:14:16+00:00): This is an incorrect address, and you removed the building name again.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-15 18:30:12+00:00): Hi, when mapping please quick Q on your keyboard to make sure the building has 90 degree corners, and please don't connect buildings to roads. Also the project you are mapping is very old, you should try a newer one
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:24:27+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:24:36+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
impiaaa (2021-04-14 14:15:34+00:00): There are two hotels in this building. How do you know that there is only one, and why did you leave a duplicate point?
zyphlar (2021-04-14 18:38:44+00:00): Hi Riyana and thanks for the contribution, however it's important not to remove the building tag from buildings. Also, since the construction is completed, we can remove the construction landuse. Finally I did some cleanup to remove the duplicate POI and move the 210 5th St address POI outside of the hotel which has a new address. You can see my changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102947025
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-15 06:55:58+00:00): My bad, won't be removing the building tag again. Thank you.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-16 07:54:54+00:00): I had a question, if the area is under construction would it fine to categorize it under construction area?
zyphlar (2021-04-16 18:00:27+00:00): Hi there! Yes to my knowledge this hotel is now open for business (especially given that you have a phone number for it now) -- when I tagged it as construction many months ago it was barely built. Obviously it will require some local knowledge or viewing the company website to really make a good determination, but OpenStreetMap should always reflect the visible on-the-ground reality as much as possible.

You did nothing wrong besides removing the building tag from the building. I just additionally made some changes to this area so that it is as accurate as I can make it.

Thank you for your contributions!
Tilia_J (2021-04-14 12:06:37+00:00): Flevolandia is the latin name of the dutch island "Vlieland", not the province / polder that was created in the 1950's 1960's.

Besides that, what is the use and relevance of adding latin names to places / regions other than historical significance?
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:19:29+00:00): Based it on the info i found on wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q707
Tilia_J (2023-01-22 18:40:08+00:00): On the following historical map of 1791, upper left corner, there are two islands visible with the text "Texella et Flevolandia" (Dutch names "Texel" and Vlieland"_

The large body of water where the compass rose is placed, was named by the Roman geographer  Pomponius Mela as "Flevo".

The Dutch historical name for this water body is "Zuyderzee" and after construction of the "Closure Dyke" in 1932 the name was changed to  "Ijsselmeer"

It was only in 1952 that part of the  Ijsselmeer was reclaimed by buiding a so-called ring dyke and the new polder became the 12th province of the Netherlands: Flevoland.

It is common that Latin names are "made up" to hounour a scientist who discovered a new meteor, animal species or chemical element.

This doesn't necessarily mean that such names have any historical significance.

I would suggest that you remove this name from the procince that the Dutch created and add it to the aforementioned island.
Tilia_J (2023-01-22 18:42:26+00:00): https://objects.library.uu.nl/reader/index.php?obj=1874/20482&lan=nl#page//95/42/67/95426772732834026871371726606441884577.jpg/mode/1up

https://genealogietimmers.nl/latijnse-plaatsnamen/

http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/Graesse/orblatf.html
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 18:44:39+00:00): Done
Buraddo (2021-04-14 18:39:52+00:00): Hello,
I saw that you deleted some neighborhood boundaries in Ploiești. Is there something bad about them?
I have re-added them in changeset #102947106. Please be more careful.
user_2066394 (2021-04-14 14:53:37+00:00): Gibt's da nen Zeithorizont für die Sperrung?
amgosm (2021-04-15 14:46:04+00:00): Laut Lokalzeitung, wird das im Gemeinderat erst noch diskutiert. Die Dauer richtet sich dann auch danach, ob saniert oder neu gebaut werden muss.
user_2066394 (2021-04-15 14:53:30+00:00): Der Hinweis wäre als note=* ganz praktisch. Und dann regelmäßig mit check_date=* überprüfen.
amgosm (2022-03-31 11:49:17+00:00): Update: Im Frühjahr 2022 soll laut einer Lokalzeitung ein Landschaftsplaner damit beauftragt werden Planungen für einen Neubau auszuarbeiten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102926679
impiaaa (2021-04-14 14:16:01+00:00): You deleted the building tag on this area. Please replace it.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-16 08:17:10+00:00): Here, can we change the building type to construction area? As it is the only thing we changed.
impiaaa (2021-04-14 14:16:48+00:00): You deleted the building tag on this area and left a duplicate point. Please replace the tag and remove duplicate information.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-16 08:16:49+00:00): Here, can we change the building type to construction area? As it is the only thing we changed.
impiaaa (2021-04-16 14:18:38+00:00): No. Add a building tag to the building and remove the duplicate information.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-19 08:08:35+00:00): After changing the  category into construction area, can't we fill the address?
impiaaa (2021-04-19 13:44:02+00:00): I've fixed it for you. It's okay to add the address, but do not create both a node and a building area for the same feature. Also, buildings should be buildings (key "building"), not construction areas (key "landuse"). Buildings (key "building") and areas can both also be hotels (key "tourism"), so you don't need to have a separate, duplicate hotel point.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-21 07:26:48+00:00): Thanks for clarification, we will be working that way.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-21 07:41:27+00:00): Do you mean we should mark building type as Building Under Construction ?
impiaaa (2021-04-21 15:35:12+00:00): When selecting an object, scroll down to the bottom of the inspector. Here you'll see the actual tags that define an object, including keys like "building," "landuse," and "tourism." Everything above that is just a convenient way to fill out the tags. You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3 . If you want to make a building that is a hotel, you can select the "hotel" preset, which sets the "tourism=hotel" tag, and then set which type of building it is, which sets the "building" key. In this case I've set it to "construction," adding the tag "building=construction," to say that it's a building under construction, however I did not change the preset to "building under construction," nor did I remove the "tourism=hotel" tag. For another case: If a hotel covers a large area with multiple buildings, you can draw an area that covers the plot, set "tourism=hotel," and remove any "building" tags, because the parcel itself is not a building. The buildings inside can then be drawn properly as buildings, without duplicating the information of the whole area.
DaveF (2021-04-15 18:22:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930633757

These two roads don't join. There a separating wall
singhiyv (2021-04-16 08:57:14+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed checking the node connectivity. Yhanks for the heads up. Its good to see the community improvising our edit quality. PFB changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103045098) for modifications. Always happy to learn from the community !!
impiaaa (2021-04-14 14:17:27+00:00): You deleted the building tag of this area and left a duplicate point. Please restore the tag and don't add duplicate information.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-16 08:16:15+00:00): Here, can we change the building type to construction area? As it is the only thing we changed.
impiaaa (2021-04-16 14:16:35+00:00): No, buildings should have building tags. There is already a surrounding construction area. If you want to specify that the building is under construction, use building=construction.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-19 08:05:47+00:00): Thank you
rayleigh1 (2021-04-14 18:10:56+00:00): driveways*
Buraddo (2021-04-14 18:47:08+00:00): Hello willisturm, It is a good think that you are doing quality control on the map, but please check with the local community before deleting a big amount of information from the map. In Romania, we keep a lot of information about the state of  highway construction on the map. It is something that a lot of people are interested in and even if those are non-standard tags you shouldn't delete them without consulting.
trigpoint (2021-04-16 11:16:34+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8629001726 is really preventing access?

Hook Park Lane is tagged as a byway which indicates that it is a legal right of way making this gate either odd, or illegal.

By tagging this as access=no you are preventing pedestrians using this route.

Cheers Phil
abakus_uploader (2021-04-14 22:31:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!