piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LukeDH (2020-10-27 11:41:01+00:00): Ho notato solo ora: togliere i numeri romani anche dai nomi di papi e sovrani è ridicolo. Si tratta di nomi propri identificati ufficialmente così. Cambiarli è oggettivamente un errore ancora più evidente delle date
katpatuka (2020-10-02 17:33:34+00:00): Looks ok so far; I've just changed way-type to residential and one way was crossing over a building which I've fixed too ;)
hup (2020-10-02 17:35:26+00:00): What about in the mill park area?
katpatuka (2020-10-02 17:54:20+00:00): The status of being a National Park has unfortunately been removed by the government to be replaced by a so-called Kapadokya Alan (https://www.osm.org/relation/9986530) but since the area is still listed in several wikipedias the area hasn't been removed (see https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı and discussion on https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tartışma:Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı - in Turkish) :/
francians (2020-10-02 17:09:12+00:00): Cos'è il bar ??
DaveF (2020-10-04 17:22:58+00:00): Hi
Is this a sport ground?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854253200
user_10215874 (2020-10-04 13:47:07+00:00): please upload object seprately as this bounding is very large
santamariense (2020-10-02 20:09:29+00:00): Oi Lucas Marques, 
Tudo bem? Esse parece ser um erro comum que tem sido replicado por diversos mapeadores ao longo do país e talvez eu também já tenha cometido este erro, mas uma conexão em "Y" não pode ser considerada um _link e sim uma highway comum. Como neste exemplo [1]. Veja o que foi discutido em [2]. 
[1]  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787487189
Bons mapeamentos
[2] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Highway_link#Y_Junctions_should_NOT_be_classified_as_links.
Bons mapeamentos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91873096
SomeoneElse (2020-10-02 16:12:18+00:00): Hello,
In OpenStreetMap the names of places normally reflect the names that people who live there use - see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf for details.  Here you've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4027452036 , as you can see at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=4027452036 - is that correct?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-02 16:12:57+00:00): Здравствуйте,
В OpenStreetMap названия мест обычно отражают названия, которые используют люди, которые там живут - подробности см. На https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Здесь вы изменили https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4027452036, как вы можете видеть на http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=4027452036 - это правильно?
С уважением,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени Рабочей группы OSM по данным.
thepriben (2020-10-07 11:48:38+00:00): Hi,
Same opinion than SomeoneElse. Moreover the link to hy.wikipedia is not available since this change. We should roolback to the previous version.
canfe (2020-10-03 06:58:59+00:00): Ma la geometria della strada di servizio è davvero quella?
A me sembra che faccia un angolo retto.
canfe (2020-10-03 06:59:38+00:00): Non mi pare che il percorso pedonale sia completamente coperto...
wille (2021-05-20 19:01:32+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91873900
rene78 (2020-10-07 20:19:34+00:00): Hi MaptainPhasma,

you removed many service=driveway. This doesn't seem to be right in my opinion. The wiki says: "A driveway is a service road leading to a residence". Thus the mapping was correct.

Can you please check with your team and change it back, please?

Thanks and regards
Rene
MaptainPhasma (2020-10-08 22:55:39+00:00): Thank you for reaching out. I removed the service driveway tags based on the OSM policy that suggests driveways should “lead toward an entrance to a specific destination” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway). Some of the driveways tagged in Kuala Lumpur seemed to be acting more as through-roads, or as access to multiple buildings. way 779657043 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779657043) and way 620059657 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620059657) provide access to multiple buildings and way 604803875 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604803875) seems more applicable as a parking lot. I’m curious of your thoughts on these examples. 
Regards,
MaptainPhasma
rene78 (2020-10-09 18:48:45+00:00): I agree with you on the examples. But many other service roads in this neighbourhood are roads within gated apartment complexes, which are solely used by residents (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605121198). I personally think that "driveway" describes those service roads pretty well.
MaptainPhasma (2020-10-12 19:46:26+00:00): Hi Rene, thanks for the information. I have added driveway tags back onto a few of the service roads. 
Best, 
MaptainPhasma
rene78 (2020-10-13 22:09:14+00:00): Great. Thank you so much!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:05:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
francians (2020-10-02 18:30:05+00:00): Ciao. Per favore ripristina i tag come erano... non ha senso la versione attuale
voschix (2021-08-28 09:50:27+00:00): Ho trovato alcuni nodi "tuoi" con traffic_sign=yes ma senza nessun altra informazione (lungo Strada Triangolo). Lavoro incompiuto, suppongo.
aceman444 (2020-12-20 00:14:25+00:00): Zdravim, co na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6918749706 znamena 'permit' ? Ked je to "so suhlasom/povolenim vlastnika", tak by to malo byt 'private'.
jurajik82 (2020-12-20 21:03:56+00:00): Suhlasim, podla definicie tam ma byt private. Skontrolujem aj ostatne tagy access, ktore som robil.
francians (2020-10-02 17:06:46+00:00): Si tratta di una lapide... Non è una feature che solitamente si mappa per quanto ne so. Ti spiace rimuoverla?
opendcc (2020-10-02 17:06:20+00:00): Hallo,
kleiner Hinweis: habs auf barrier=lift_gate geändert.

Servus Wolfgang
trial (2020-10-02 20:51:59+00:00): Merci d'utiliser un commentaire pertinent. Mettre les arrêts de bus en V2 c'est très bien mais n'a rien à voir avec : #maproulette;#Phone_or_fax_number_is_not_in_international_format_
pitscheplatsch (2020-10-03 08:40:23+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91894209
pitscheplatsch (2020-10-03 08:40:40+00:00): Hi rcain, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SekeRob (2020-10-03 08:42:44+00:00): Sitting in Italy and see your edit come across with 503 nodes editing water taps from north central Canada to most western tip of India, so your comment indicates. Just curious, was that some 'off' label, and how would you know they're all at cemeteries?
Anyway, this popped up in my local history and to be honest, these single change sets and the quantity of them, really numerous is disturbing, like the guy who somehow managed yesterday to plant a few trees in scotland and modify a bunker in the Sinai at the same time.
Again, just curious why they're so many of these.
cheers
mbs (2020-10-03 09:22:13+00:00): I have searched all water_points within an (area) cemetery using overpass. And water_point are places where you can get larger amounts of "drinking water" for filling a fresh water holding tank, such as found on caravans, RVs and boats. No tanks for caravans are filled up inside a cemetery.
regards mbs
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-05 16:20:21+00:00): Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?

Have you discussed this change with affected communities?

Note that anyone may revert this edit for any reason as an undiscussed mechanical edit.
mbs (2020-10-05 18:11:57+00:00): I use overpass turbo only for search. I manually checked all points on the map to see if they are located in a cemetery. I couldn't see that any of the points are water_points for caravans etc.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-06 14:18:36+00:00): This is clearly a mechanical edit that should have been discussed beforehand.  It doesn't look very "source=logical" at all; it just looks like guesswork.
Can you please follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct retrospectively so that people expecting certain data would wonder where it has gone?
Best Regards,
Andy
mbs (2020-10-06 15:53:10+00:00): For me it is logical that on the cemeteries (without access for caravans or boats) no water_point can be placed. I have checked this on the map one by one, so I did not assume automatic processing (according to wiki).

Sorry for my mistake. Should I undo the processing or start a discussion in the mailing list afterwards?
user_11418917 (2021-05-24 04:46:17+00:00): Why did you delete the buildings shapes??
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91877739
gscscnd (2020-10-04 10:15:15+00:00): Wycofałem. Adres strony internetowej jest już dodany do obiektu szkoły (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839112524), nie ma potrzeby dodawania go do budynków.
abakus_uploader (2020-10-02 22:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Pt873 (2020-10-03 17:19:18+00:00): Oi, tudo bem? A Avenida Senador Vitorino Freire (próximo à Fonte do Bispo) está passando por obras e a rotatória deixará de existir.
bigbug21 (2020-11-14 22:42:41+00:00): Hi JJJWegdam, thank you for adding numerous speeds in Ulm. I am about to remove most of those speeds, because many are just not plausible. In particular, 40 km/h is rarely use in shunting tracks, in particular not in turntables or workshops.
Crogan (2020-10-03 08:31:57+00:00): Какой смысл наносить на карту объекты на частной територии? Этот дом публичный, открыт для всех желающих покупаться , попариться и посидеть в тени 3х деревьев? Зачем бассейн, 3 дерева и баня (тег бани вообще не используется, кроме публичной бани). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854290538
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:45:13+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91879081
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:44:44+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91879098
Mike Raust (2020-10-02 18:49:17+00:00): Great quality! CanVec import?
alester (2020-10-02 20:15:14+00:00): Thanks! It was a combination of water and waterway data from CanVec, road and landcover/landuse tracing from aerial imagery, and road names from BC logging road data.
MxxCon (2020-10-05 23:25:15+00:00): Dude, this edit contains so many incorrect edits, it's unbelievable! I have to go feature-by-feature undoing your vandalism!
eggie (2020-10-02 19:20:10+00:00): Dag Slowie,
Je vraagt om een review.. 
Lijkt me oke... Map what's on the ground is het motto!

'k Heb overigens nog nooit iemand daar iets mee zien doen... 
Kwam dan vast op het verkeerde moment langs fietsen. :)
MVG,
Eggie
Cascafico (2020-10-03 09:44:56+00:00): Ciao,
niente di importante, ma normalmente mettiamo strada, via, viale, piazza ecc  con la maiuscola. Cita pure la fonte delle informazioni... tipo "sopraluogo", "comune di Pippo" ecc: aiuterà chi vuole modificare dopo a capire la bontà del tuo dato.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91879934
MxxCon (2020-10-05 21:57:25+00:00): Dude, why would you delete correctly mapped bus stop names?!
Crogan (2020-10-03 08:14:54+00:00): Что тут реально расположенно дерево которое является памятником природы? Табличка на нем есть или сам это придумал? По спутниковому снимку вокруг немало таких же деревьев, они наверное тоже "памятники природы"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7967118293
Luzandro (2020-10-03 04:37:26+00:00): Hallo, 

der Radstreifen auf der Fahrbahn ist schon als cycleway=lane vorhanden und es gibt hier keine bauliche Trennung (bzw. im Bereich der Kreuzung ist er sogar zw. den Fahrbahnen). Das ist also kein separater highway=cycleway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway=lane
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91883367
pvvertreter (2020-10-03 04:46:44+00:00): Hallo,
danke.
Lukas615 (2020-10-18 19:34:51+00:00): Hallo Famiras,
warum hast Du bei der Güterumgehungsbahn usage=freight gesetzt? Das was Du damit kennzeichnen möchtest, ist wahrscheinlich railway:traffic_mode=freight .
Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:passenger_lines
Gruß Lukas
Lukas615 (2020-10-18 19:36:06+00:00): Was ich auch noch schreiben wollte: Warum hast du passenger_lines entfernt?
Famiras (2020-10-18 20:06:29+00:00): Hi Lukas,
mit dem usaage=freight hab ich mich wirklich vertan.
Und mit dem passenger_lines, hatte die englische Beschreibung wohl falsch verstanden. Hatte das nur auf Personenzüge bezogen und die verkehren auf der Güterumgehungsbahn nicht, daher hatte ich angenommen, das wäre dort falsch. Ich werd das die Tage beides berichtigen.
Danke für die Hinweise.
Gruß Famiras
naveenpf (2020-10-05 10:01:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91884374
szydzio (2020-11-09 18:56:43+00:00): Czy ten budynek naprawdę nazywa się Piechu? Komentarz do zmiany "Powszechnie znana osoba" może sugerować że chodzi o czyjeś nazwisko.
BCNorwich (2020-10-06 09:22:18+00:00): Hi,
This section of path you've added, Way: Southdowns Way (854341107), is placed atop of existing highways and as such is duplication, (path on top of road). The route Southdowns Way, both hiking:-https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/77976 and mtb:-https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5881, is mapped utilising the existing highways.
I've removed the duplication highway.

If you could have a look at those routes you'll see how they are made up from existing sections of highways.  

Regards Bernard.
DressyPear4 (2020-10-02 22:25:32+00:00): Qual critério você está usando para rebaixar a classificação e deletar o código da rodovia?
Essa parte é uma ligação, e não pode ser classificada como principal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91885456
Rodrigo306 (2020-10-02 22:30:22+00:00): A Avenida Raimundo Pereira de Magalhães é uma avenida de ligação sim, porém não é uma rodovia. Trata-se de uma avenida sob jurisdição da Prefeitura do Município de São Paulo e que liga o distrito da Lapa ao distrito de Perus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91885456
MichS (2023-11-29 20:23:53+00:00): Hallo,

wie sieht es mit der Freigabe der Daten von LANIS nach OSM aus? Dürfen wir diese für OSM übernehmen?

MFG

M
MichS (2023-11-30 17:53:58+00:00): Soweit sich nichts geändert hat, konnte ich nun lesen, dass die Daten aus https://geodaten.naturschutz.rlp.de/kartendienste_naturschutz/index.php
entnommen werden nicht in OSM verwendet werden dürfen.

Unter anderem:

https://lvermgeo.rlp.de/de/geodaten-geoshop/opendata/

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/landesamt-fur-vermessung-und-geobasisinformation-rheinland-pfalz/95222
LightSpirit (2023-11-30 19:07:24+00:00): Ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern, was ich damals dort gemappt habe, wahrscheinlich habe ich die Flur dort hauptsächlich vervollständigt.
wireguy (2020-10-03 16:48:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM Smore!   I fixed the pizza box, it was made into a relation instead of a way.   Keep mapping!
smb1001 (2020-10-05 08:48:12+00:00): Thanks for adding the tags to St Mary's church. The denomination should be anglican, though -- all 16000 churches of the Church of England have that tag. If you want to mark it as evangelical then that's better put as a subdenomination.
Ludhiana (2021-03-25 13:21:06+00:00): Hi u277a,
you've added farmland which overlays other farmland mapped with much higher precision (compare
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=854355558 ). Please don't do this again!
Ludhiana (2021-03-25 13:29:34+00:00): Sorry, I didn't notice that all the ways were by you.
clairedelune (2020-10-02 23:19:55+00:00): There seem to be repeated issue with JOSM since it does not always record changeset comments and source. This changeset comment: "Villages et postes de santé, Equateur", source: "MSFOCB, collecte des données avec Osmand et Kobo (mars 2020)".
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:44:18+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. The way you added for the Plaza doesn't match real shape. Also is redundant and wrong to have a shop node inside the way shop. Try to fix it. Good day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91886967
PT-53 (2020-11-01 13:06:58+00:00): Hallo  DD1GJ,
Du hast diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25677143/history
von residential zur tertiary hochgestuft.
Das war wohl ein Versehen, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
gefunden  mit brouter-suspects:
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=17/8.26975/48.77965&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
DD1GJ (2020-11-01 13:24:56+00:00): Hallo Peter,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte die Einzelteile der Ortsdurchfahrt nach dem Namen selektiert. Es ist jetzt korrigiert.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
MxxCon (2020-10-05 21:29:25+00:00): Why did you delete many existing and correctly mapped road segments here?
MxxCon (2020-10-05 21:35:39+00:00): Also why did you delete correctly mapped bus stop names from this neighborhood?
MxxCon (2020-10-05 21:27:36+00:00): Could you please make smaller changeset. Makes it easier to correct any potential mistakes.
Also please try to draw buildings to their baseline, not roof line. Drawing them to the baseline ensure that they are positioned accurately regardless of the satellite/plane view angel changes.
gpserror (2020-10-03 14:36:48+00:00): I'm not sure of the value of these bus ways.  The ways aren't even part of the relation so I'm not sure if it would be used.  IMO explicitly drawing these out isn't necessary and just makes the map messy, what is your opinion?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-12 11:27:51+00:00): Hello!

You used
surveillance:type=camera;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7967627271/history

Have you maybe meant
surveillance:type=camera
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
gpserror (2020-10-03 14:38:17+00:00): I'm not sure of the value of these bus ways.  The ways aren't even part of the relation so I'm not sure if it would be used.  IMO explicitly drawing these out isn't necessary and just makes the map messy, what is your opinion?
hoserab (2020-10-05 17:51:42+00:00): Hi 0b0e. I have reverted your changes to the SW BRT once again. Please stop tagging that road as a bus guideway. It is *not* a bus guideway, it's just a regular road that happens to be accessible only to buses. 

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus%20guideway to understand the differences. A bus guideway is a road wherein the buses are steered by external means, e.g. a track or special curbs. This road is simply a two-lane, bus-only road where the bus drivers must operate the buses as normal, so it is properly tagged as highway=service, access=no, bus=designated.

Please desist from changing it back to highway=bus_guideway.
0b0e (2020-10-05 21:36:41+00:00): I've only done it once but ok
hoserab (2020-10-06 20:33:48+00:00): Well according to the change history you've done it twice. You changed it in changeset 91568557, I changed it back the next day in 91593786, and you changed it back in this one, 91888314...
ivanbranco (2021-12-22 21:48:50+00:00): Hi Steve,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/60779100/history

place=Lighthouse Point 
is not a valid value place. Can you check it out?
ke9tv (2021-12-28 02:41:46+00:00): Hi, Steve.

I'm taking the liberty of removing the 'Town of Ellery' way in the middle of Chautauqua Lake, since it never was useful (admin boundaries have to be closed), and I'm in the process of importing all the missing townships from NYSGIS data.  Expect to see Town of Ellery with a complete boundary in OSM shortly.
SteveKHayes (2021-12-28 13:53:08+00:00): @ke9tv thank you for the note, looking forward to the updated township data.   @ivanbranco see attached for info re lighthouse point.  https://docs.dos.ny.gov/opd-lwrp/LWRP/Chautauqua_Lake/Original/Maps/LanUseChautauquaMaps%2016.pdf
ivanbranco (2021-12-28 15:04:57+00:00): Thanks, but what I was trying to point out is that the value of the "place" tag is not valid. place tags are to be used with values such as city, town, village, suburb, locality ecc.
What is this "lighthouse point"? If is the name of the cape it should be tagged as natural=cape, not with place=*
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-10-04 20:05:25+00:00): merci beaucoup d'avoir effacé mon travail qui m'a pris des heures à faire, tu n'as même pas pris la peine de transférer les anciennes étiquettes dans les nouvelles limites administratives que tu as établies