piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aharvey (2019-10-24 02:39:29+00:00): Hi, could you point out where this path is signposted for bicycles? I couldn't see a sign from my Mapillary photos and bicycle=designated should only be used where signposted. It's a stronger indication of you're allowed to use this way over just bicycle=yes. It certainly looks on the ground like a footpath or generic path that you can cycle on rather than a cycleway or shared path. I'm not saying I'm right here, just looking for more information about your change.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:11:23+00:00): Hi,
As listed in the Northern Sydney Cycling Map: http://www.mosman.nsw.gov.au/file_download/1945/NorthernSydneyCyclingMap.pdf
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:17:19+00:00): It's best practice to map what's on the ground https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground so generally what other maps say doesn't matter much compared to what information can be determined from on the ground.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:27:36+00:00): Ah. I will check and grab a photo when I next pass through there.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:37:55+00:00): Would this sign indicating cycle route suffice?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/26QSHvQUoHfM-VzJ3usjnA
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:40:15+00:00): Oh yeah I missed that. Yes that implies that it's some kind of bicycle infrastructure and bicycles are allow. Thanks for confirming that.
aharvey (2019-10-24 02:48:37+00:00): PS. The placement tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:placement is used to say where the geometry is, so that when rendered with lanes they align eg. from JOSM with the Lane Attributes style https://imgur.com/ilAgBQx
kadircelik (2019-10-24 11:07:49+00:00): Its official name is Küçük Ağrı Dağı and its Turkish. Please dont change it
aharvey (2019-10-24 02:54:14+00:00): Keep in mind that highway=cycleway is for a physically separated path, if just separated from the road by paint, it's a cycleway=lane tag on the road way, not a seperate way as highway=cycleway. I know it can be hard to model this one though since it's quite a complex junction and changes between physical separation, but from the imagery, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738071033 shouldn't be a separate way as there is no physical separation.

Did you want to fix this?
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:18:57+00:00): Yep. I'll correct it.
M!dgard (2019-10-24 00:03:54+00:00): Comment should have been “Add distribution cables from Ham”
user_5359 (2019-10-24 05:06:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. leisure=golf_course is for the whole property, not for every green.
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:00:11+00:00): This looks good, according to https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/eH7jFyeMbYDtnxlBUu6fgw it is physically separated so it's good that you've mapped it with a separate way. You could also update the road https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34282299 to remove the bicycle tags which aren't really correct as it's not a counter flow cyclelane, it's a separate path.
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:03:59+00:00): According to https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/c0t-T4YQyaBPZt5Hugnj6g the pedestrian and bicycle lanes are segregated, but not physically separated, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated. Has that changed recently or is the on the ground the same as that older Mapillary image? If it hasn't change recently we'll need to revert this back to a single way with segregated=yes.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:26:35+00:00): Sorry. No, it has not changed. There is not physical separation between Footpath and cycleway.
aharvey (2019-10-24 07:23:49+00:00): Okay I've changed this back and made a few more updates from the latest Mapillary images.
mariotomo (2020-02-15 19:50:04+00:00): 'track' es para senderos con sólo función agrícola.  por favor corregir.
mariotomo (2020-02-15 20:00:37+00:00): solo como sugerencia, pues no he visto el lugar:
(highway:unclassified; smoothness:very_bad; surface:ground)
jet_01 (2020-08-28 12:18:15+00:00): Hi sb9576,
Came across an overlapping way (way 709519027), just wanted to bring it to your notice :)
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:39:00+00:00): In your change you've made Arthur Street continue further along past the intersection but according to the signage on the ground https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Sd8o0YzS4Az6az1JTMaE5Q the road name changes at the intersection, so I've reverted this change.

Also on the footbridge I couldn't see any signage that says it's a cycleway.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:44:09+00:00): Yes, you're right. Sorry again. We use it to cross over to the Shared Path. But it's not sign posted that way.
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:49:00+00:00): I know I use it all the time too, even though it's not signposted for bicycles.
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:45:06+00:00): With respect to https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/629142495 last time I was here there was a bicycle dismount sign -> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/UnMwUempYTkOa1uAti79vg

Is that sign no longer there? As you changed this from bicycle=dismount to bicycle=designated.
aharvey (2019-10-24 03:50:58+00:00): 2. Also for https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/724653636 you removed footway=crossing but according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=crossing that tag is used to mark segments of path which are crossings, which this segment is, so it should have that tag.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 03:54:29+00:00): Yes, there is still a dismount sign there (stupidly). But if a footpath, how does that affect continuity with navigation? Will navigation suggest that route if the shared path suddenly stops and becomes a footpath?
Nathjg (2019-10-24 04:03:16+00:00): There's also a dismount sign for the bridge crossing over Wakehurst Parkway from the Aquatic Centre. Should that be changed also?
aharvey (2019-10-24 04:04:03+00:00): I was once riding in the opposite direction so never saw the sign and got told off by an elderly man that I should dismount.

Most bicycle routers should still route you through bicycle=dismount, but it will probably apply a speed penalty. Either way we need to map this accurately to reflect what's on the ground.

Access tags like bicycle= and foot= are completely separate things than what the feature is highway=footway, highway=cycleway.
aharvey (2019-10-24 04:05:34+00:00): Yes anything signposted as dismount should be tagged as bicycle=dismount see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_Restrictions and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
Nathjg (2019-10-24 04:05:59+00:00): Of course
aharvey (2019-10-24 12:25:22+00:00): Ok I've added cycleway=crossing back into https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/724653636
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 22:57:55+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10207028 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 22:59:33+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição 10207029
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 23:00:29+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição 10207030
DiogoBaptista98 (2019-11-13 04:07:45+00:00): Encontrei, é este o changeset que contem os erros
Josef K (2019-11-13 04:10:18+00:00): Já respondi por mensagem privada.
Carnildo (2019-10-24 07:55:53+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted an elevator in Seattle?
viloan (2019-10-24 02:11:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Geosmalley (2019-10-28 20:29:56+00:00): try to start with larger public buildings. try to follow rooftop lines, then right click and square the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76129326
Geosmalley (2019-10-28 20:27:52+00:00): zoom in and draw the lines around individual buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76129405
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
Geosmalley (2019-10-28 20:31:34+00:00): not sure this is a building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76129783
viloan (2019-10-24 03:53:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Allison P (2021-11-12 08:53:05+00:00): It's been a couple years, and none of the roads are on aerial imagery. Has the project been delayed?
Tindog (2021-11-12 11:30:49+00:00): No, it's currently under construction right now. However some of the roads have changed, and a park has been added.
Tindog (2021-11-12 11:35:15+00:00): If you look at a June 2021 aerial imagery you will see it, and even Google has some of the roads listed. The project was upset when Olympia Hills to its north was being approved by the county. However, construction is moving forward.
Allison P (2021-11-12 22:08:03+00:00): None of the imagery on iD is from then. Good to know that it's ongoing though. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks!

On second look, this changeset covers a wide area. To be clear, I'm referring to the construction just north of Butterfield Creek in Herriman.
Tindog (2021-11-13 01:46:20+00:00): Yes, that is correct, that is what I assumed you were referring to.
aharvey (2019-10-24 05:51:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738103276
I think you meant "public_transport" not "public_tra" ;-)
same for the second one you've added.
Maradona11 (2019-10-24 21:06:20+00:00): thank you.  now fixed:)
aharvey (2019-10-24 05:59:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8515478 isn't needed as you already have the no right turn restriction https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/I1AgsYQT-AX6atqvTO0D3g
aharvey (2019-10-24 06:01:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10207312 again isn't needed since there is only a signposted only left turn which is already mapped.
aharvey (2019-10-24 06:01:57+00:00): also not sure what https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10207313 is
aharvey (2019-10-24 06:07:44+00:00): I've fixed these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76133836. there were some conflicts when I made the upload, looks like you already started deleting some.

Would be good to understand what you were trying to do here?
Nathjg (2019-10-24 06:16:36+00:00): As this is the recommended cycle route from the Roseville Bridge to Chatswood, et al, I was attempting to configure the crossings, etc, so that when others attempt to navigate using OSM for bike riding, this would be a route option.
aharvey (2019-10-24 06:19:21+00:00): Oh yeah the crossings you added were good, thanks for that, it was more the turn restrictions which I didn't understand the intent behind.
Nathjg (2019-10-24 06:25:32+00:00): Haha. Sorry. Thought I was being thorough.
aharvey (2019-10-24 05:49:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10207320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10207319
^ what are these two for?
aharvey (2019-10-24 06:06:07+00:00): I've fixed a bunch of these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76133836
Prusaker (2019-10-24 07:25:55+00:00): А на улице Михалово разве ограничение скорости в 40 км/ч? Со стороны улицы Смееняко во всяком случае нет никаких ограничивающих скорость знаков.
Prusaker (2019-10-24 07:26:55+00:00): По панорамам от Яндекса по улице нет ни одного знака, ограничивающего скорость. Или уже поставили знаки?
Alexey_ND (2019-10-24 14:26:05+00:00): там нельзя больше, перерыто и т.д.
Prusaker (2019-10-24 14:35:13+00:00): А, так это maxspeed:practial указывает реальную скорость с учётом качества покрытия. А по ПДД там 60 никто не отменял. Я понял. Сейчас поставлю корректные теги.
Prusaker (2019-10-24 14:40:48+00:00): Если там сильно перерыто, то может тогда  в maxspeed:practical вписать значение меньшее, чем 40 км/ч?
user_5359 (2019-10-24 07:23:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
According to your description you didn't sell computers but create software. Therefore I changed the business description from shop=computer to office=it.
trigpoint (2019-10-24 12:07:11+00:00): Please respond to changeset comments before you keep changing tags which may break the database for other users.

You appear to be engaged in an edit war.

If you believe the tagging is incorrect then please discuss it with the community.

Some of your comment, such as the system imply you are working for someone and are covered by a directed editing policy, your user description should cover this.

Cheers Phil
ndm (2019-10-24 22:45:14+00:00): You can't drive a normal bus on these sections (or in fact any other vehicle, or cycle, or ride - a horse) hence "access=no".

You can use a "guided bus" - hence bus:guided=yes.

If your system doesn't understand bus:guided, then you need to preprocess the data beforehand -- not change carefuilly surveyed on the ground OpenStreetMap data.
korolenok (2019-10-30 11:00:31+00:00): Hi! Why did you decide to clear the multipolygon and add a separate point for Vistula Lagoon only in the territory of Russia?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76134372
Joseph E (2019-10-30 23:14:19+00:00): This is in regards to relation 8140878: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8140878/history

I did not intend to delete this feature. I actually attempted to extend it further east, but when I tried to upload JOSM reported that it was empty. I'm not sure what went wrong, but I had a poor internet connection at the time, so it is possible that data was lost when I attempted to make the changes. I will see if I am able to fix it, by downloading the last version and merging with the current data.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76134372
itineris (2020-05-05 07:46:12+00:00): Szia!

Miért illegalizáltad ezt az utat? Végig létező felfestés, legutóbb a hétvégén jártuk be oda-vissza. Az utat végig elegyengették és felszórták finom murvával (Pilisi Parkerdő? fakitermelők?), talán ennek köszönhetően bringasztráda is lett belőle.

Üdv:
Ákos
AndreasTUHU (2020-05-06 08:16:16+00:00): Ez lehet a háttérben:
https://1.kerulet.ittlakunk.hu/termeszet/190706/haboru-turistajelzesek-miatt-budai-erdokben-miert-mazoljak-le-szurkevel-kek
Üdv,
András
matthiasbe (2019-10-24 07:13:45+00:00): Le station s'appelle "Place Jacques et Thérèse Tréfouël"
Je l'ai placé un peu trop vers la route.
Comment représenter que les bornes de la station sont réparties d'un côté et de l'autre de la bouche de métro ?
bielebog (2019-10-24 10:30:02+00:00): Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738122744 ist zwar ein Fußweg, in OSM nimmt man in Deutschland üblicherweise aber nur highway=footway, wenn da so ein blaues Fußgängerschild ist. Alles andere wäre highway=path, foot yes. 
Mit access=no ist es niemandem erlaubt, diesen Weg zu nutzen. Das access=* kann hier einfach weg.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76135052
user_5359 (2019-10-24 07:30:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Frans S (2019-10-24 08:55:49+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here. Your mappings are quite good. A few remarks
Please do not include a few buildings into 1 mapping. Be aware of courtyards. They show no shadow.(or are fenced which can be seen on the shadow both on the inside as well as on the outside) Buildings shows most of the time a shadow what proofs that they are above ground level. Do not include this shadow in your mapping.
Best regards and keep mapping
MansiG (2019-10-24 16:25:41+00:00): hi there. 
Thanks for validating. please explain the first remark i.e. where you mentioned few buildings in one mapping. what are these few buildings ?
user_11354269 (2020-08-30 09:33:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавляйте тег building yes к зданиям. В josm можно установить модуль buildings_tools, что облегчает рисование домов.
nevw (2019-10-24 11:26:52+00:00): I added office=telecommunication to your edit. Please correct if necessary
user_5359 (2019-10-24 17:32:02+00:00): Hallo! Meinst Du ein Automat der auch Geld einkassiert (von wegen money_transfer) oder ein normaler Geldautomat (das wäre dann https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Datm)?
freebeer (2019-10-25 05:07:06+00:00): another thing is the typo in `name   Raiffeis*T*enbank Automat'
blodern (2019-10-25 08:48:02+00:00): Hallo user_5359,

habe folgende Anpassungen gemacht.
Änderung: 76194161

Ob der Automat auch Geld annimmt, weiß ich leider nicht.
user_5359 (2019-10-24 17:42:56+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kurze Frage zu Deinem Eintrag: Was soll denn der Name "LWB 043.0" an der Adresse bedeuten? Ich sehe dort eher eine Tiefgarageneinfahrt (und die hat nun mal keine Adresse).
Monti63 (2019-10-25 05:36:33+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen Löschwasserbrunnen. Dürfen Brunnen eingetragen werden, um sie in OpenStreetMap für die Feuerwehr auffindbar zu machen?
user_5359 (2019-10-25 06:06:23+00:00): Natürlich, wenn sie denn sauber bezeichnet werden. Siehe Dir bitte mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:emergency und die folgenden Seiten an.
user_5359 (2019-10-24 19:31:05+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), over (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
naaitha (2019-10-25 11:18:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #76201903.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions. 

Regards,
naaitha.
user_5359 (2019-10-24 16:01:49+00:00): Hello! Please remember the access value (see see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). I have correct your mistake.
ntanniru (2019-10-25 10:58:40+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake. I Will ensure not to repeat the error again.Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
ntanniru.
osmviborg (2019-10-24 07:40:10+00:00): Vejen er tilgængelig igen https://jv.dk/artikel/sand-og-halmballer-fjernet-men-bilisterne-har-ikke-opdaget-det-endnu
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-10-24 15:02:16+00:00): Why is the whole world in the box
ralley (2019-10-24 16:44:24+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Unfortunately this changeset added a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6911507022 which is making it look like you've edited the whole world.  Can you please clean it up?
ralley (2019-10-26 01:57:31+00:00): Orphan node removed
arjunaraoc (2019-10-25 04:24:07+00:00): There are two NH167A relations. I think one could be deleted.
kapazao (2020-03-13 19:33:25+00:00): Hola, la estación de esquí ya existía y la duplicaste. La he eliminado.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/76138503
kapazao (2020-03-13 19:29:39+00:00): Hola, la estación de esquí ya existía y la duplicaste. La he eliminado.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/76138812
Владимир К (2020-07-06 19:50:52+00:00): Здавствуйте!
Хотел бы узнать насчет двух участков
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738144876
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738144877
почему там нет проезда? на снимках колеи накатаны.
плюс не понятно как машины попадают сюда https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149513436, если тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738144877 проезда нет
kapazao (2020-03-13 19:25:36+00:00): Hola, la estación de esquí ya existía y la duplicaste. La he eliminado.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/76139117
glglgl (2019-10-24 08:06:10+00:00): (gemeint ist natürlich Alschbach)
Warin61 (2019-12-04 06:51:02+00:00): Multipolygon member ways should not have the same tags on their member ways 
See relation 10210166