piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-04-10 12:59:19+00:00): Feedback.. In deze changeset heb je Koning Davidstraat 113 heel ergensa anfders heen verplaatst. Oorzaak.. schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.. Beter dus niet schuiven.. dan krijg je dit soort effecten.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119528654

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-10 13:01:00+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld.
Groet,  eggie
kartonage (2022-04-11 12:24:40+00:00): Hej kjon,

warst du vor Ort oder wie kommst du auf dieses Tagging? Deine angegebene Quelle gibt das auf jeden Fall nicht her.
Truchin (2022-04-12 06:58:50+00:00): Bonjour Christian,

J'ai l'impression que cette voie n'existe plus depuis au moins 2 ans : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050727658
Elle aurait été rouverte récemment ?

Thomas
cquest (2022-04-12 15:55:42+00:00): Je me suis fait avoir par la BD Ortho dans sa résolution maximale.
Je viens de la supprimer.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-10 22:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SekeRob (2022-04-10 10:32:18+00:00): The thought boundary tag  might not have been a good idea. There's half dozen plus featureless lines that follow the park relation only with a note+source tag on them (why?). Will wait for error report, though think they will be no show. Boundary key at least gives a feedback of why they're on the map.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-10 22:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
PT-53 (2022-04-19 06:41:30+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,
Du hast diese beiden  Straßenabschnitte
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050738169/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050738169/history
mit
access=no
voll gesperrt.

Wie lange soll die Sperrung voraussichtlich andauern und wo gibt es Infos dazu?

Fragende Grüße
hanchao (2022-04-11 13:31:23+00:00): 你添加的居民区不正确，已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119579813
gormur (2022-07-04 14:24:46+00:00): Dette changesettet overskrev "on the ground" observasjoner.
Se f.eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115664331 Bygget er revet
PT-53 (2022-04-11 06:50:28+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Du hast an diesem Straßenabschnitt
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618519266/history
das Merkmal
maxspeed=100
gelöscht. Welche Höchstgeschwindigkeit besteht den dann dort ?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-05-01 08:14:15+00:00): Berichtigt > Danke

Eine Rückmeldung wäre auch noch schön gewesen.
Dimitar155 (2022-04-10 12:24:08+00:00): Hello,

Why did you delete the road for cars?
gurglypipe (2022-04-11 09:33:01+00:00): Nice!
ManDay (2022-04-10 17:38:35+00:00): Cheers!
rmikke (2022-04-11 15:52:05+00:00): Nie ma co iść na rekord, do Księgi Guinessa nie trafisz...
Cztery apteki o tym samym ref:csioz 1092576 tym razem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9655891600
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9655869463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9655791905
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9655869462
Wszystkie mają też wpisany adres "Pułtusk, Rynek 18"
eggie (2022-04-10 13:03:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Hier heb je de info van het Kadaster verwijderd.

Een apotheek tag je met amenity=pharmacy
Heeft de apotheek ook een naam? 
Een camping met tourism=camp_site

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-10 13:11:36+00:00): tourism=camp_site toegevoegd.
eggie (2022-04-10 13:06:21+00:00): Beste Monique.. Wanneer je hospital tagt.. Ziekenhuis dan zet je gebruikers op het verkeerde been.
De juiste tag is amenity=pharmacy

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-10 13:09:25+00:00): Ziekenhuis verwijderd en omgetagd naar apotheek. 
BAG info hersteld.

MVG
eggie
julcnx (2022-04-12 13:42:50+00:00): Hi Yot Chaiyana, thank you for your contributions. could you please use a better description for the changeset ? also, what source did you use for the ref updates?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119534292
AnBaRa (2022-04-10 13:06:58+00:00): Ci sono errori nell'area che ho circoscritto. Non riesco a eliminarla (è la mia priuma modifica). Se qualcuno può farlo (o dirmi come fare) provvederò poi a inserirla correttamente. Grazie
Samuele Battarra (2022-04-10 16:24:02+00:00): Ciao, purtroppo l'editor online ha problemi a cancellare oggetti così grossi, bisogna usare l'editor desktop (Josm). Te l'ho cancellata io.

Ti segnalo inoltre un paio di problemi a cui fare attenzione:
- molti dei punti che delimitavano l'area erano agganciati ad elementi preesistenti, questo è sbagliato, elementi di questo tipo così come i confini non devono condividere punti con gli altri oggetti;
- le etichette che hai usato servono per indicare un bacino, non un bacino idrografico che è una cosa diversa.
Samuele Battarra (2022-04-10 16:26:34+00:00): P.S.
Se hai dei dubbi su come mappare puoi consultare la documentazione https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale oppure iscriverti al canale Telegram OpenStreetMapItalia.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-19 19:14:23+00:00): Er zijn hier nu erg veel Talmastraten!
Kun je dat herstellen?
emvee (2022-04-19 19:17:36+00:00): Zeker, daar is iets goed fout gegaan, ik ga het herstellen.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-19 19:19:25+00:00): Dank!
emvee (2022-04-19 19:37:48+00:00): Opgelost in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119922789

Domme fout gemaakt, ik snap nog niet hoe.

Wijziging teruggedraaid mbv de Reverter plugin
marczoutendijk (2022-04-19 19:46:02+00:00): Ik kwam de melding nb tegen op het "nieuwe" forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/users-netherlands-belgium-dutch/598/15?u=marczoutendijk
emvee (2022-04-19 21:18:01+00:00): Bedankt, goed de bron te weten.

Ook maar gelijk een account aangemaakt op het nieuwe forum.
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-03-31 08:16:21+00:00): Hi, I just noticed you added the wikipedia=it:Poste Vaticane tag to the temporary post office on the square. Please note this article is about the postal service, not about this office.
SafetyIng (2022-04-21 11:28:20+00:00): Hey, was hast du denn hier gemacht? Hier wurde nur ein Node hinzugefügt mit einem Namen und keinen weiteren Inhalt....
Firefishy (2022-04-10 23:30:45+00:00): Nice first edit! Thank you for helping improving the map of Greytown. ;-)
Any other additions greatly appreciated.
Firefishy (2022-04-10 23:31:24+00:00): PS: I think the street details for the Nursery likely need a fix.
eggie (2022-04-10 19:33:10+00:00): Dag pgoeman... 
Je vraagt feedback .. 
Lijkt me helemaal oke.

MVG
eggie
Langlaeufer (2025-01-17 17:59:09+00:00): Es gibt hier genau genommen vier Leitplanken (je eine je Fahrbahnrand und Fahrtrichtung)
eggie (2022-04-10 19:35:16+00:00): Dag pgoeman..  Lijkt me oke.., maar wanneer op de aansluitende wegen horse=no geldt zal dit vast voor dit gedeelte ook gelden.
MVG eggie
user_2066394 (2022-04-10 19:26:42+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
eggie (2022-04-10 19:26:03+00:00): Dag Juan.. Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer de weg echt verdwenen is dan heb je het correct gedaan. Wellicht kun je de wegen van de uitbreiding ook al op de kaart zetten.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=10-04-2021&loc=52.34770%2C5.654311%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-03-11&acqid=20220311_111100_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1

MVG
eggie
Juan_72 (2022-04-11 11:48:20+00:00): Eggie,
Deze weg is inderdaad helemaal verdwenen. Wilde hier gisteren wandelen en helaas.....
Ik zal op basis van de kaart-link die jij gestuurd hebt proberen zo goed mogelijk de toekomstige situatie op de kaart te zetten.  Vanaf de grond zag ik nog geen structuur wat paden/wegen betreft.
Gr. Jan
eggie (2022-04-11 12:52:33+00:00): Ha Jan.. Wanneer het al vorm krijgt dan als highway=construction construction=......
Wegen waar nog niets van te zien is maar al bv op een tekening staan als highway=proposed.  ..proposed=....
Succes
Eggie
Leo Slager (2022-04-11 11:43:57+00:00): typo 
primary-link gewijzigd in primary_link.
eggie (2022-04-10 19:17:58+00:00): Dag Juan... Gebruik in zo'n geval access=private ipv =no
Het hek heb ik ook even toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Juan_72 (2022-04-11 11:45:17+00:00): Eggie, 
Dank je voor deze tips. Hier zal ik de volgende keer rekening meehouden.
Gr. Juan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-04-11 22:09:37+00:00): Mondawmin is not the "ghetto" it would be better if you didn't use inflammatory changeset summaries like this.
CorruptComputer (2022-04-11 23:58:11+00:00): Yeah this changeset comment comes off as extremely racist to me. Especially considering this part of Baltimore has a very high minority population.

Source for the demographic info: https://baltplanning.maps.arcgis.com/apps/presentation/index.html?webmap=44cac6e3116b4dc1997bee7b78700154&slide=1
DUGA (2022-04-12 00:16:19+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the headsup.

I do not have to check those data before using the word ghetto, because I have no idea this is a racist word. In fact, it is not a word defined as derogatory by any online dictionary. My mother language is not English.

However, to avoid this, I will not use the word in the future to avoid frustrations.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-04-12 00:20:30+00:00): Thank you I appreciate it, even if you did not intend it that way people will likely take it that way. There are some contexts in which it is not used in a derogatory way (such as in historical contexts) but it is considered a derogatory way to refer to an area in America
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-10 14:26:37+00:00): /changeset/118693593
Kovoschiz (2022-04-10 15:14:18+00:00): /changeset/118699293
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
phodgkin (2025-10-03 20:14:43+00:00): Do the addresses added to building perimeters in this changeset correspond to entrances? It would make sense to add entrance=yes to capture this.
drnoble (2025-10-04 18:57:10+00:00): Yes, they probably do, and entrance =yes/home/shop is probably appropriate, but I’m not going to go back and retag the thousands of addresses I’ve mapped. If someone else wants to improve the tags, please go ahead.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-10 17:45:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/7065169792/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-10 17:42:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2022-04-10 17:52:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I see our footway: Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:08:07+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119538010
rskedgell (2025-08-27 15:50:04+00:00): Was the 15mph speed limit on Victoria Bridge a temporary restriction for street works?
Pink Duck (2022-08-03 11:25:47+00:00): Isn't paved value closer to BitMac (bitumous McAddam) as used on pavements than asphalt? (as in hot-rolled road surfacing)
Tristan Scott (2022-08-03 16:06:05+00:00): for accessibility purposes, asphalt and bitmac are practically the same thing, and paved is more generic - it might mean paving stones, not a single surface. here I'm happy that asphalt is closer than the more generic paved. And in practice I expect any attempt to differentiate between asphalt and bitmac in streetcomplete would just generate random choices.
Pink Duck (2022-08-03 16:16:12+00:00): Shouldn't StreetComplete just simplify the choice to unpaved/paved? There’s already a specific value paving_stones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
The guide actually mentions bitumen in 'paved' and 'asphalt concrete' for asphalt.

The value 'tarmac' might be a better fit, though only 268 uses in taginfo.

It just bugs me, since it isn’t asphalt.
Tristan Scott (2022-08-03 16:31:10+00:00): tarmac is a trade name, for asphalt.
if it's changed to paved it's a loss of information, but making a new tag bitmac would result in every use of the dataset treating it as unknown, so asphalt is the closest match without adding to tag value fragmentation.
Pink Duck (2022-08-03 16:33:49+00:00): Tarmac is the company name, tarmac with a lowercase has been used by some to mean the material associated with the company (often bitmac from paving-sized jobs).

I just don't see the value gain from switching from 'paved' to something technically incorrect. It would be better to remain generically known as, well, not un-paved.
user_5359 (2022-04-13 06:41:43+00:00): Hello! Please use not:operator instead of operator:not (could be also a language code).
Gazer75 (2022-04-10 15:00:26+00:00): Big bounding box due to long power lines modified.
eggie (2022-04-10 19:21:49+00:00): Dag handoff.. 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Probeer in zo'n geval bij te taggen op de adresnode. In dit geval nr 28.
Ik heb de info even samengevoegd.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
ivanbranco (2022-04-10 21:07:16+00:00): Ciao Davide,

attenzione, pare non esserci consenso con i doppi nomi, quantomeno in Croazia, dove questo changeset è stato parzialmente revertato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119546601). Ti conviene interfacciarti con la community locale se vuoi procedere oltre.

Buon mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
sorcrosc (2022-04-10 21:50:21+00:00): Ciao.
La fonte che stai usando per mappare ha una licenza compatibile con OSM?
Mi pare di capire che si tratta di Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 e quindi non si può usare senza una ulteriore autorizzazione esplicita del proprietario.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:07:27+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119542170
eggie (2022-04-10 19:08:33+00:00): Dag SchepersZelf...   Schijnwerpers toevoegen kan natuurlijk prima, maar niet name=Schijnwerper toevoegen svp. ..
name=...  alleen gebruiken als iets echt een naam heeft. Niet gebruiken voor een functie.
MVG eggie
eggie (2022-04-10 19:13:02+00:00): name=Schijnwerper verwijderd.
Lege nodes zonder tags verwijderd.
Zie ook Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

MVG
eggie
SchepersZelf (2022-04-10 19:34:21+00:00): Dankjewel voor je reactie Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
canfe (2022-04-10 17:48:30+00:00): Secondo me "I chiodaioli" non è un "monument".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119542300
Jrachi (2022-04-10 18:05:59+00:00): Sei più rapido di quanto io riesca a sbagliare!
Dove il commit pensavo a mettere  un nome più corretto di com'è chiamato da tutti.
Poi: https://www.comune.traves.to.it/it-it/vivere-il-comune/cosa-vedere/monumento-ai-chiodaroli-31694-1-227c5048e60526066ce465d1e4bed70d?immagini

Ivo
user_5359 (2022-04-12 17:46:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119545649!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
A67-A67 (2022-08-05 13:36:42+00:00): Ik heb de tagging hersteld naar cycleway=lane. Er zijn namelijk fietsstroken, geen fietspaden.