piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-11-09 19:34:14+00:00): This appears like quite a meaningless edit. You mixed up 2 adresses which is why I have reverted this changeset
manoharuss (2017-11-10 05:48:24+00:00): Hi wuj,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I see that you have requested review for your edits.

This is the turn restriction you have edited. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7493764. I am guessing your intention is to deleted the restriction based on your changeset comment. But you have deleted only the via role in the relation and not the whole relation itself. In iD editor, one must delete all roles to delete the entire relation.

But the turn restriction itself seems to exist from Mapillary imagery. here is a picture in which the sign is visible. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9To7LvH6PLsRIfvl0h_Esw&focus=photo.

I have restored the relation to previous correct state. please be sure to check on street imagery sources available to check for most recent ground truth. Satellite imagery can sometimes be outdated and misinforming. Please feel free to reply.


Thanks,

Manohar
wuj (2017-11-10 17:43:15+00:00): Thanks for the help, Manohar. I did not intent to remove the restriction turns from Mission to 10th. I intended to remove the restriction from southbound 10th to Mission (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1310163#map=19/37.77588/-122.41609)
and here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=37.775807&lng=-122.41658&z=17&pKey=lPwgSb8P0U1UxMzB_KpOCw&focus=photo
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:34:03+00:00): Olá, Joao.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-11-10 03:29:27+00:00): Esta edição foi revertida pelos changesets 53653694, 53655964, 53655117 com o seguinte comentário: Revertendo inserção de marcos quilométricos É necessário conversar com a comunidade antes de inserir os dados dessa maneira. Você é bem vindo a participar através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
geoaria (2017-11-09 19:22:20+00:00): دقیقا توضیح مید هید اینها چی بودند حذف شدند . کامنت را دقیق بنویسید بهتر است
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
4004 (2017-11-09 22:09:58+00:00): а чего public_transport	platform то убирать?
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:47:46+00:00): The building outline should only cover the actual building. Parking lots are separate features. I made the correction to the building.
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:38:40+00:00): I added a building tag but can you give more detail why this building is called the historic ft sampson tourist destination? Is there a website?
mvexel (2018-01-04 17:28:47+00:00): Hi mueschel -- in this changeset (and maybe others?) you modified some destination:street:fr/en to destination:street:lang:fr/en. I am curious about your reasoning? We discussed this in the talk-ca mailing list a little while ago (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008073.html and the 
 rest of that thread) and the consensus seemed to be that destination:street:fr/en was preferred. Do you mind if I changed it back to what the community seems to prefer? Thanks, Martijn (mvexel)
mueschel (2018-01-04 18:53:25+00:00): Hi,
well, the Wiki specifically asks to use "destination:lang:en", to make clear it is a language.
As example: destination:street:to - is this a street further away (like in destination:ref:to), or is it a Tongan street name? 

For me, this points to that this syntax should also be used for other destination-subkeys. 
There are e.g. destination:to:lang:en and your destination:street:lang:en.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:lang:.3Clanguage_code.3E
I see that you added a few lines to this page in October promoting destination:street:en, but this was never discussed on the Talk page of this proposal. A local mailing list might not be the best place to discuss such issues with influence on global tagging. E.g. there are some destination:street:lang:en also in Asia. These are few, mainly because street names are not commonly used as destinations in Western Europe.

Concluding: Yes, I would mind if you change it, because it wouldn't fit the rest of destination tagging.
mvexel (2018-01-04 21:36:29+00:00): Ah, okay, I see. That aspect did not come up in the discussion. Since this seemed to be a pretty uncommon case (at the time I did not find more than a handful cases worldwide) I found it appropriate to discuss on the country list where we were editing (we being Telenav). As long as it is consistent either way is fine with me.

The fact that it was never discussed on the Talk page does not really resonate with me; destination:lang was not discussed there either. I do appreciate your argument for reducing ambiguity by inserting the lang: qualifier.
mvexel (2018-01-04 21:45:43+00:00): I added a section to the wiki talk page now: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:street_multilingual
Constable (2017-11-10 09:05:28+00:00): ciao carlo, occhio che le relazioni in generale non devono avere i tag highway e foot, perché la relazione ha il solo scopo di evidenziare più tratti di strada, non serve per definire il tipo di strada (path in questo caso).
Rimuovo io i due tag
Ciao
Takuto (2017-11-09 20:31:14+00:00): Красота какая, спасибо!
Takuto (2017-11-09 20:31:43+00:00): Здания, если верить КП40, планируются к сносу.
SDmitrii (2017-11-30 21:30:57+00:00): Извини, я проворонил письмо об этих комментариях. Здания 57а и 59 и какой-то там их гараж уже снесли, но я пока не отметил.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:29:05+00:00): I think you might have been trying to do a building outline. Use the area tool in iD to create an area and tag it as building=apartments. I went ahead and made the change including merging the node with the outline
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:12:59+00:00): I expanded the street name for 50th Court South - OSM uses full names to prevent problem software has expanding abbreviated names.
jeph125 (2017-11-10 00:10:18+00:00): Thank you!
user_5359 (2017-11-11 13:12:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice a house doesnt’t have a name, which is identical with his address.
Boomzilla! (2017-11-11 16:37:48+00:00): I can’t parse that which you wrote. The names of the roads i redrew are accurate. I live in that atreet.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 16:41:03+00:00): Please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384012729/history#map=19/37.42960/-122.22706 . I have delete the key name.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 13:13:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:44:26+00:00): Can you add a tag to describe the Hospice Friends feature? Is it an office=ngo or some kind of shop?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:32:24+00:00): The storage area isn't a building. I changed it to landuse. You can add the individual buildings if you like.
Glassman (2017-11-09 20:42:02+00:00): please remember to square your buildings to match the imagery. (select the outline and use the "s" key to square it.)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tuxayo (2018-06-26 10:40:57+00:00): Hi! :) there was a mistake the on following ways. level was used instead of admin_level.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169476875/history
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
5m4u9 (2018-01-03 22:00:54+00:00): Un error en un camino sobre el embalse de la represa misicuni, ya lo arreglé. la imagen es algo antigua
robram2004 (2018-01-04 15:34:57+00:00): gracias
naoliv (2017-11-28 01:30:17+00:00): Gustavo, aparentemente você está trabalhando junto com a Clara?
Teve alguns objetos que você apagou nesta sua edição para depois serem inseridos novamente. Por exemplo, algumas ruas que a Clara colocou no mapa.
Alguns outros caminhos que, apesar de não terem nenhuma tag, também foram apagados. Ao que tudo indica era necessário apenas marcá-las como highway=track ou highway=unclassified.
Gustavo Almeida Arq (2017-11-28 01:38:08+00:00): Boa noite naoliv! Amanhã vou checar o que ocorreu, estamos trabalhando juntos e eu já havia feito essas alterações na malha viária enquanto ela trabalhava com o uso e ocupação do solo. Imagino que houve uma sobreposição das informações dela em relação às minhas modificações. Ela baixou a base de dados antes que eu fizesse as alterações na malha viária, hoje quando subiu as informações de uso e ocupação do solo, carregou também as informações desatualizadas da malha viária. Amanhã vamos conferir juntos as informações, mas a princípio, as ruas que eu criei estão corretas.
Gustavo Almeida Arq (2017-11-28 01:39:40+00:00): Especificamente sobre um loteamento que apaguei e refiz, foi porque ela fez todas as ruas como se fosse um polígono, aí apaguei e refiz rua por rua, pra depois colocarmos os nomes corretos.
naoliv (2017-11-28 01:46:52+00:00): Certo.
Se vocês tiverem interesse em participar mais ativamente da comunidade, podem entrar em contato através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Os do Telegram (Comunidade e Suporte) costumam ser os mais movimentados.
É interessante para poder tirar dúvidas, aprendar e também ensinar novas coisas, além de se enturmar com o resto do pessoal que também costuma mapear.
Abraço!
naoliv (2017-11-28 01:48:19+00:00): *aprender
splatoonlover33 (2017-11-10 03:04:04+00:00): Будьте внимательней: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53649261

Я вернул остановку.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-09 20:03:38+00:00): ddx_del: 0
ddx_nothing: 0
dxd_create: 10
dxx_update: 0
xdd_nothing: 0
xdx_delete: 0
xxd_create: 0
xxd_nothing: 0
xxx_update: 27546
update: 27546
update_touched: 31
update_not_touched: 27515
update_distanceTooFar_skipped: 0
update_distanceTooFar_ignored: 0
create: 10
del: 0
nothing: 0
touched: 41
total_newGTFS: 27556
total_oldGTFS: 27546
total_OsmBeforeRun: 27546
total_OsmAfterRun: 27556
New file download date (IDT): 2017-11-09_215746_Thu
Old file download date (IDT): 2017-11-08_220902_Wed
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
laurent-38 (2017-11-23 07:47:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Les giratoires doivent être taggués highway=roundabout. Le tag oneway=* est alors implicite, inutile de l'ajouter. 
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:junction=roundabout

Il existe des outils d'aide à la correction d'erreurs, par exemple Osmose : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Revenge_666

Cordialement
--
laurent-38
Dino Michelini (2018-01-08 14:42:07+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai messo a Viterbo per l'ospedale di Belcolle su di un vertice del parcheggio i tag amenity=hospital, 
healthcare=hospital, name=Pronto Soccorso Ospedale Belcolle. Per come hai mappato è evidente che non sei di Viterbo né che conosci l'ospedale perchè il pronto soccorso non si trova dove lo hai collocato davanti alla palazzina C (ufficio amministrativi) ma vicino all'eliporto sopra al centro trassfusionale. Inoltre, non ti sei accorto neanche che era gia segnalato correttamente. Trovo la cosa veramente grave, perchè al pronto soccorso ci si rivolge non per una aspirina ma per cose molto serie ed urgenti dove il tempo può fare la differenza e tu dando questa indicazione sbagliata non fai altro che complicare le cose a chi usa il navigatore per arrivare al prontio soccorso. Per favore rimuovi quanto prima questi tag e cerca di mappare le cose che conosci, sopratutto in questi casi così delicati.
cesaregerbino (2018-01-08 15:00:19+00:00): Ciao Dino,
ti ringrazio della segnalazione dell'errore. Ho provveduto alla cancellazione. 
Sto lavorando ad un servizio che ha come obiettivo quello di offrire accesso ai dati dei numero di pazienti in attesa / visita nei pronto soccorsi quando questi sono offerti come open data o comunque tramite pagine web. Mi serve la localizzazione del pronto soccorso (nota del pronto soccorso NON dell'ospedale ... ), perchè vorrei anche offrire il percorso per arrivarci. Quindi sono ben conscio dell'importanza della precisione di questo dato.  Purtroppo non ho fatto attenzione che in questo caso specifico il punto che mi serviva c'era già ... errore (grossolano lo ammetto ... ), e hai fatto bene a farmelo notare e ti ringrazio.
naoliv (2017-11-14 11:17:30+00:00): Hola agendagauchajujuy.
Algunos mapeadores están intentando contacto con usted, como aquí https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50324302
¿Podría responder a ellos, por favor?
naoliv (2017-11-14 11:22:23+00:00): También sería bueno responder a otros como https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44639210 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44639210
Gracias
naoliv (2017-11-14 11:41:03+00:00): * https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50324302 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44639210
eggie (2017-11-09 21:50:08+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-09 21:54:32+00:00): Oke.. goede edits. Is het gedeelte van de HP Vermeulenstraat tot nr. 18 wellicht ook oneway=yes?
dieterdreist (2019-02-04 11:17:29+00:00): Ciao Cesare, ho solo ora notato che hai inserito questo doppione del CTO (era già mappato come area), ma non sono sicuro se lì c'è un secondo ingresso al pronto soccorso. L'ingresso che conosco è dall'altra parte e si accede tramite una rampa (da Via San Nemesio). Mi puoi confermare se la posizione è esatta o approssimativa? Grazie.
bdwillet (2017-11-28 21:57:40+00:00): Looks Good!
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-26 12:32:05+00:00): Die ganzen Notes (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53650163#map=17/53.50854/8.60886&layers=N) sollten wohl Merker für die Hausnummern sein? Dann setz sie bitte auf Erledigt, sonst stehen sie bis zum Sankt-Nimmerleins-Tag in der Datenbank :) Dazu musst du leider jede einzeln anklicken und dann auf „Erledigt“. 

Ich persönlich setze in solchen Fällen nur lokale Merker (z.B. GPX-Wegpunkte) in meiner Software, dann muss auch nichts hinterher wieder aus der Datenbank entfernt werden. Mit Vespucci könntest du die Hausnummern aber auch direkt eintragen, ohne den Umweg über Notes.
GerdP (2017-11-10 09:55:53+00:00): Moin!
Mir ist dieser Weg aufgefallen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539501367
wegen highway=passing_place
Das sollte an einen node, nicht an eine Fläche.
Ist das hier ein Platz, wo z.B. Trecker rechts ran fahren, um andere überholen zu lassen? Eigentlich braucht man ja an mehrspurigen Straßen keinen passing_place.
fmarier (2017-11-10 09:09:11+00:00): Hey I noticed that you are adding a lot of new business entries.

I just wanted to point out two small things about the formatting of certain fields:

1. The telephone field needs to include the international calling code, which for Canada is "+1". So that would be "+1 778 ..." instead of just "778 ..."

2. The opening hours field uses semicolons (not commas) to separate different days. So "Mo-Th 09:00-17:00; Fri-Sun 12:00-16:00" instead of "Mo-Th 09:00-17:00, Fri-Sun 12:00-16:00".

Thanks for taking the time to contribute to OpenStreetMap!
user_5359 (2017-11-11 13:04:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the barrier must be part of the street.
R0bst3r (2017-11-10 10:42:40+00:00): Hallo Gero Gerke,
die Versatzkorrektur sieht gut aus.
Für weitere Infos zum Versatz von Luftbilder in OSM bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden lesen.
Danke und Gruß
Gero Gerke (2017-11-10 10:54:21+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,

ich wohne in der Gegend und kenne die Gebäude daher in Person, aber vielen dank für den Link, die Informationen werde ich mir zu Herzen nehmen!

Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2017-11-10 10:39:04+00:00): Hallo Gero Gerke,
willkommen bei OSM.
Eine Garage kann man so eintragen. Genauer wäre es, wenn man das Gebäude auch als Garage kennzeichnet mit dem Tag building=garage oder über die Vorlage im Editor.
Mit einem Rechtsklick auf ein markiertes Objekt erhälst du weitere Optionen, u.a. kann man Flächen rechtwinklig machen, alternativ die Taste 'S' drücken.
Viele Grüße
Gero Gerke (2017-11-10 10:41:12+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,

danke für dein Feedback und die Tipps.

Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2017-11-10 10:36:26+00:00): Hallo coral741,
willkommen bei OSM.
Diese Änderung sieht gut aus.
Für erste Schritte kann ich learnosm.org empfehlen, wissenswertes ist unter wiki.osm.org verfügbar.
Viele Grüße
literan (2017-11-10 10:28:32+00:00): точки без значащих тегов ( с одними name) недопустимы (это равно точкам без тегов). OSM - не викимапия
neo-plan (2017-11-10 11:19:04+00:00): Вы что, за мной следите?
literan (2017-11-10 11:30:00+00:00): не за вами, а за всеми правками в Москве и ближайшем подмосковье. И вы можете следить (в том числе за мной): http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/ Проект коллективный, работаем сообща.
woodpeck (2017-11-10 11:58:51+00:00): Mir ist aufgefallen, dass im Dateinamen was vom "3. Weltkrieg" steht. Zum Glück ist es derzeit noch offensichtlich, dass es ein Fehler ist ;) da das File aber auf Wikimedia Commons liegt und auch bei openplaques verlinkt ist, habe ich mich nicht getraut, was zu ändern.
eggie (2017-11-09 22:23:20+00:00): Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Er liggen wegen op elkaar geplakt nu. Dit was je edit. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53651610
Ik kijk er even naar.
eggie (2017-11-09 22:25:04+00:00): Je hebt ook een "ford" aangebracht. dat is een doorwaadbare plaatst in een rivier. Wat is precies je bedoeling daarmee?
Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-11-09 22:38:49+00:00): De wegen heb ik goed gelegd volgens de kadaster pdok 2016 luchtfoto. De doorwaadbare plaats in de rivier ook verwijderd. Verder lagen de wegen nog los of hadden geen tags. Ze zitten nu vast.
Wanneer je vragen hebt kun je rustig reageren. Is de nieuwe verbinding de Remiselaan?
eggie (2017-11-09 22:54:41+00:00): Probeer in te loggen via www.openstreetmap.org en doe je edits svp met een echte editor. Wellicht gaat het dan beter... en lees je goed in. Zie welkomstmail.
pguijt (2017-11-10 10:00:12+00:00): Stom ja zo hooord  het volgede keer wat beter eddite  ben nog niet zoo goed in ben niet pc dom dus leer het wel thx voor de hulp volgede keer wat beter doen