piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scruss (2016-02-29 01:32:15+00:00): Hi - if these stops were imported from City of Ottawa open data, please note that the city's licence is incompatible with OSM's OdBL, and should be removed - http://clipol.org/licences/16?tab=licence_compatibility
sperlingskauz (2017-12-03 21:16:11+00:00): Hi ij_,

for your information: I changed your tagging man_made = bee_hive to man_made = beehive. The reason is that since this year there is a wiki page for beehives.

Regards,
sperlingskauz
mariotomo (2020-02-14 14:00:54+00:00): hola.  estoy buscando una fuente confiable para la numeración de las carreteras en Panamá.  veo que añadiste un 'ref=1000'.  donde encontraste esta información?
mariotomo (2020-02-14 14:23:46+00:00): misma pregunta para 'ref=45'.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-17 02:00:45+00:00): Dear gepeix,

What does "natural_monument" mean for trees like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2402344202/history . Those appear to be common backyard, road and farm trees.

Could you look at the tagging?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-01 15:03:14+00:00): What's Pepe?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-30 21:11:04+00:00): Nie sklejamy obszarów landuse=* z drogami (highway=*) Mówię np. o tym przypadku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232372729 
W razie wątpliwości zapraszam na forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19518
GerdP (2015-10-31 11:26:48+00:00): please review node 44311745:
the tag should be highway=motorway_junction
(also for primary roads)
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-06-22 04:42:26+00:00): Hi QuangNguyen@TMA!
I think this way is properly a residential tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232409164
So, I changed this way to residential.
Osm1980 (2016-10-29 16:59:24+00:00): tage estakhr kosar be nazar eshtebah ast
GerdP (2015-10-28 18:45:49+00:00): please review node 1694864351:
It was tagged highway=roundabout,
I've corrected this to junction=roundabout,
but it may also be a highway=mini_roundabout.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
eggie (2019-10-02 15:05:00+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
elot360 (2021-07-24 07:21:34+00:00): Wiem, trochę nie w porę, ale czemu dałeś przystanek Chebzie Pawła dla T9 w stronę Świętochłowic w takim komicznym miejscu, skoro go nigdy tam nie było?
dzamper (2021-08-17 18:13:08+00:00): Rozumiem że masz na myśli w stronę z Świętochłowic? Z tego co widzę to na Ortofoto prawdziwe miejsce peronu zasłaniają drzewa. Pewnie dlatego się go tam nie dopatrzyłem i dodałem w złym miejscu trochę na czuja
elot360 (2021-08-23 05:53:55+00:00): Nie doprecyzowałem, chodziło mi o Stop_platform. Spójrz, znajduje się on po drugiej stronie jezdni, co jest totalną abstrakcją :p
dzamper (2021-09-19 11:05:51+00:00): W Rudzie Śląskiej przystanek tramwajowy po drugiej stronie jezdni niż tory to chyba jeszcze nic aż tak nadzwyczajnego :P
elot360 (2021-09-19 11:42:13+00:00): W Rudzie samej w sobie nie, ale w tym konkretnym miejscu nigdy tak nie było. O to mi chodzi, zresztą spójrz sobie na Street View :P
SomeoneElse (2017-12-29 11:33:49+00:00): Hi Steve,
Just wondering about the leisure=park tag on here - I'm not convinced that it really is a "leisure=park" in the laid-out-parkland sense that's described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park .  I'll admit it's a few years since I've been here, but I'd be surprised if it's changed that much.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to understand how things are tagged as they are.
Best Regards,
Andy
stevea (2017-12-30 00:32:18+00:00): It's a good question, Andy, and it's nice to text with you in near real-time (I am a fan of your edits, you are dedicated!).

What you are asking is at an edge of history in OSM as a project:  in this part of California circa 2008-2010, this is how large parks were imported into this part of California.  OSM community was early (though effective) and the structure of it has grown much, as well as movement forward to "standardize" on "how to do parks."

As this (the semantics of "leisure=park" in OSM) truly is fluid, and you are correct to nail it down in our wiki.  However, nothing in that wiki directly contradicts what we do here.  So if you're asking for a history lesson of "how things have gotten tagged around here," there is one, I know some of it w.r.t. this park, and there is an explanation for it.  I know there are newer ways of doing things, the situation remains a bit fluid.

In short, this IS a park, we truly must make our wiki's semantic definition elastic enough to include this county park.  Joseph Grant Park as it is now tagged in OSM meets that test.  Might we agree there?

If you have more accurate or higher precision or both data, of course, bring 'em on and upload!

Is there a different tagging you prefer?  OK, protected_area is getting to be all the rage for certain things, yes, I agree, and yet, JGP is a park.  Right?

Again, great to make your acquaintance,
Steve
DaxServer (2016-12-08 09:34:36+00:00): Hi! I didn't understand the tag "place:cca" => "b1". Can you clarify?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2408119848/history
Your Village Maps (2019-05-11 03:41:50+00:00): I believe the standard for golf cart "paths" is highway = track, tracktype = grade1. Has there a been a problem with routers routing on them?
user_3022894 (2018-10-27 18:05:17+00:00): Hi chqrc,
zu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2408181302 → wenn du den shelter (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232468238) einzeln einzeichnest, dann braucht es an der Bushaltestelle kein zusätzliches shelter=yes. Dann hätte man den shelter zweimal in der Datenbank.
Viele Grüße Lukas
tyr_asd (2016-01-15 11:47:22+00:00): FYI: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/497884
eggie (2021-02-23 10:05:34+00:00): Dag welout,

Volgens mij heb je nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen met nuttige links en tips.. Bij deze per PB
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-21 22:23:32+00:00): Wszystko pięknie, tylko czemu obszary są poprzyklejane do osi dróg?
tyr_asd (2017-02-22 14:17:37+00:00): If I see this correctly, you've added the German translation "Kärnten" to the Koroška administrative boundary (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1703687, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carinthia_Statistical_Region, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q673562?uselang=en), which I think is not correct. Where did you get this translation from?
beweta (2017-02-25 22:56:21+00:00): Koroška is the Slovenian name for Kärnten.

See: https://www.google.de/search?q=Koro%C5%A1ka+K%C3%A4rnten
tyr_asd (2017-02-27 13:08:41+00:00): Yes, but Kärnten is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37985 and as far as I can see this name doesn't apply to the "Koroška statistična regija" region in Slovenia?
loukote (2023-04-03 20:42:44+00:00): This is now gone. New shop: Modernista. To be changed.
luschi (2015-08-17 20:49:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/31847
bitte lesen und kommentieren.
lg
imi007 (2019-03-07 18:23:06+00:00): Hi Firman Hadi,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the nodes from node 6320316442 till node 3504427972 and from node 3504436597 till node 3041575653 classified as 'Motorway'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'secondary'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Protoxenus (2018-08-28 16:09:42+00:00): Hi,
mir ist aufgefallen, das du das Gebäude des Parkhauses am Eingang der Holzhalbinsel mit einer Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 10 km/h versehen hast. Ist das ein Versehen oder meinst du das ernst?
Gruß Protoxenus
Olga | Yanosik (2015-06-18 09:11:23+00:00): Pytanie do pana Władysława Komorka, autora tej edycji - czy można zdjąć z ul. Czerwone Maki access=private? Wg informacji naszego użytkownika droga ta jest dojazdem do biurowców i jest ogólnodostępna. Dodanie tego tagu powoduje, że nasza nawigacja nie prowadzi do numerów 82 i 84. Proszę o informację, czy ten tag jest odpowiedni dla zamkniętych osiedli, z wjazdem tylko dla mieszkańców?
Władysław Komorek (2015-06-18 20:49:14+00:00): access=private zostało dodane w 2012 roku przez innego mapowicza.
micheleOSM3 (2023-09-02 07:12:42+00:00): Da dove hai preso i riferimenti per l'anello delle giulie?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:22:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174317962/history has access:hgv = no that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/hgv/&***/access%3Ahgv/
mappy123 (2024-05-03 05:26:46+00:00): Puh quite old edit. But yes these days I would use hgv=no. Maybe in the old days it was a lack of knowledge from my end. I have changed it.
arvdk (2017-12-14 13:16:32+00:00): Hi, there is a question about your added tag 'motor_vehicle=no'. See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1097577
trial (2019-10-17 09:11:48+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que tu as ajouté des "seamark:light:2" sur le feu de Lochrist. Faire des essais je n'ai rien contre mais il vaut mieux ne pas les pousser sur le serveur et a minima faire un revert après ! Sinon 6 ans plus tard ça y est encore et c'est en comparant avec différentes sources (donc celle citée... qui était celle de la version 3). Tu enlèves ce que tu avais ajouté à tort ? Car le feu est purement directionnel.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-22 00:06:52+00:00): Hello Czech,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag on Gregory Lake here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If a compatible source can't be found, we'll need to remove data that may have come from Google.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
eggie (2020-11-04 13:52:18+00:00): Nu edits aan de grens van Nederland daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
kreuzschnabel (2017-03-11 18:24:10+00:00): Zu http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232761418 : Ich finde die Praxis unschön, Verkehrsinseln über zwei separate Einbahnstraßen abzubilden. Dafür gibt es eigentlich traffic_calming=island, damit geht das viel eleganter. Aber wenn schon teilen, dann bitte vollständig mit no_u_turn-Relationen an den Vereinigungspunkten, sonst versuchen Navis verständlicherweise regelmäßig, an solchen Stellen zu wenden.
user_3022894 (2019-01-02 10:37:07+00:00): Hi simlox,
auch, wenn es ewig her ist: highway=traffic_signals ist nur eine Abstraktion, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals und dann im Abschnitt "How to Map": "The mapping of traffic signals is an abstraction that the particular junction or way is regulated by traffic lights.
It is not a representation of a particular device. ", deswegen kann an einfachen Kreuzungen, wie es auch hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72877536#map=19/53.58058/9.78610 der Fall ist, das highway=trafffic_signals ruhig in der Mitte bleiben. Nur bei komplizierteren Kreuzungen müssen vier einzelne Nodes her.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
eggie (2017-11-08 10:55:19+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
stephankn (2017-10-19 06:12:42+00:00): This is a Buddhist graveyard? As you changed it from cemetery you indicate it belongs to the temple next to it. I know this concept mostly from Europe where a graveyard is next to the church.

The aerial looks much more like the Chinese cemeteries I have seen before...
Mishari (2017-11-19 02:11:01+00:00): You're right, it is a cemetery, but by definition in the wiki I thought it's to be tagged a graveyard. Perhaps a clarification needs to be added to the wiki?
Covid-LockDown (2020-10-21 17:00:55+00:00): Hello KristenK,

You have corrected added the road name but missed to correct the classification, the carto doesn't look good .
airdace (2015-01-30 11:05:09+00:00): A Pozsonyi (autóknak is) kétirányú részén mit takar a shared_lane címke? Vannak itt piktók?
Roland Pallai (2015-01-30 11:24:43+00:00): Elbizonytalanodtam, de megnézem még ma.
Roland Pallai (2015-01-30 15:36:20+00:00): Igazad volt, a kétirányú részen nincsenek piktogramok. Javítottam a #28507045 -ben.
tyr_asd (2015-06-27 16:28:00+00:00): Hi. Kannst du vielleicht schnell mal auf folgendes Note schauen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/386012
Danke
mariotomo (2022-10-04 16:14:39+00:00): Hola Ariel, entiendo que es una importación muy vieja, pero puesto que sigues en OSM, me interesa si me quisieras comentar sobre la "Manzana de Hoteles" (way 232947950). quizás ahora con más experiencia y más contactos dentro de OSM la etiquetarías diferente? el wiki dice "Industrial land may include buildings like workshops, factories or warehouses and their associated infrastructure".
ArielRod (2022-10-05 16:00:25+00:00): Hola Mario:
Tan tiempo que no veo esos datos, que es posible que haya cambiado.
Queda a vuestra discreción hacer los cambios.
au1brgfdf (2018-11-02 18:11:44+00:00): The name is Fonte Majora
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-12 18:01:52+00:00): For http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232981998 you wrote drinking_water=none . Should that be drinking_water=no ?
FrViPofm (2015-05-13 07:50:44+00:00): No, it means there is no water at all in this place. I have added a note.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-13 16:27:03+00:00): drinking_water=no usually means that.  There has been tagging mailing list talk about difference between "no developed water but a stream nearby" and "no water at all".
eggie (2017-05-28 17:27:43+00:00): Na jaren weer begonnen maar nog geen 10 mapping-days.. Daarom een hernieuwd welkomstmail
Gumeg (2017-08-03 12:48:38+00:00): Добрый день!
Большая просьба указывать в комментариях правок источники данных обрисовки. Или в теге Source пакета правок. Сейчас смотрю на полевые дороги около Красноармейска - очень много не понятного: исчезнувшие дороги, сильно смещенные.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-19 09:57:01+00:00): Hallo, diese Tour ist auch 2019 noch nicht ausgeschildert. Sie ist demnach keine Route im OSM-Sinne. Es stellt sich auch die Copyright-Frage. Bist du der ursprüngliche Autor der Tour oder hast du OSM kompatible Nutzungsrechte zu dieser Tour? Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65941&p=2
LG Robert
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-19 09:58:56+00:00): Hallo, diese Tour ist auch 2019 noch nicht ausgeschildert. Sie ist demnach keine Route im OSM-Sinne. Es stellt sich auch die Copyright-Frage. Bist du der ursprüngliche Autor der Tour oder hast du OSM kompatible Nutzungsrechte zu dieser Tour? Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65941&p=2
LG Robert
marczoutendijk (2021-12-01 14:50:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2414848957
natural=sound
What exactly is it that we can hear at this spot?
Shouldn't this be natural=reef?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dreef
marczoutendijk (2021-12-02 15:10:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233164519
Ist landuse=unused ein Fehler oder Absicht? Wenn ja, was bedeutet es? Es steht nicht im Wiki und wird nur sehr selten verwendet.
Is landuse=unused a mistake or on purpose? If so, what does it mean? It is not in the wiki and its use is very rare.
eggie (2017-08-09 10:57:49+00:00): Opnieuw welkom per PB gestuurd
mariotomo (2019-11-25 14:26:21+00:00): hola.  gracias por mapear.  entre otras cosas, en este changeset has puesto dos polígonos con la misma forma, con un offset relativo de unos 10m (Norte-Sur), un natural=wetland (233169189) y un natural=wood (233169190).  ambos en el medio del mar, o sea fuera de cualquier natural=coastline.

otros polígonos igualmente con errores de etiquetaje en el área: 233169190, 233169197, …

no uses por favor la etiqueta para el nombre propio del objeto (name) para otras cosas: natural=wood y name=Manglar, a menos que se trate de un bosque natural conocido con el nombre "Manglar", debería ser natural=wetland y wetland=mangrove.

si necesitas ayuda para entender como funciona OSM, pregunta.  gracias.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-17 23:56:09+00:00): I've merged the rcnhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3134217 into the icn https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3134216 since one was a subset of the other.  Hope this is OK...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 13:02:21+00:00): I have a small question about this ancient edit and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233181194/history

what you think nowadays about shop=white_goods and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dappliance ?
Would it be fine to retag this object to shop=appliance or is shop=white_goods describing something else or is actually preferable?
Deanna Earley (2025-04-08 20:59:05+00:00): I think appliance and white goods are largely interchangable.
Deanna Earley (2025-04-08 20:59:23+00:00): (As long as you're not doing a bulk update)
trial (2019-10-11 18:30:12+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que la zone commerciale ajoutée https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233224305 est bien le Parc de la Douitée ?
frosm (2019-06-21 23:04:08+00:00): bonjour,
connaissez-vous le nom de la distillerie ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 17:33:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233235063/history has waterway = creek that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=creek? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=creek differs from waterway=stream in this case?
tastrax (2024-04-26 05:43:18+00:00): Updated to stream.
frosm (2019-05-27 14:41:25+00:00): Bonjour,
vous souvenez-vous de la signification des noeuds avec camp_site:electric=yes ?
cela représente un point d'alimentation électrique ? une parcelle qui dispose d'une telle alimentation ? autre ?
Yod4z (2019-05-27 17:51:06+00:00): Bonjour, le but était d'indiquer la prise électrique pour le campeur si paiement
frosm (2019-05-31 10:25:25+00:00): vous souvenez vous si c'était sous forme d'armoire dite de rue du genre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/9/95/Street_cabinet_friendship.jpg ?
ou si c'était un petit poteau ?
Yod4z (2019-05-31 13:12:21+00:00): Je ne m'en souviens plus
ivanbranco (2023-11-21 08:52:56+00:00): Ciao AnyFile,

so che sono passati 10 anni, ma forse hai ancora conoscenza locale di questo posto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2416147978

shop=graphics é un valore non documentato, secondo te office=graphic_design potrebbe sostituirlo?
AnyFile (2023-11-21 17:34:45+00:00): Temo di non ricordarmelo. E sarebbe da vedere se esiste ancora.
mariotomo (2020-02-17 19:25:38+00:00): looks like a massive import, what's the source?  and how come I look for houses corresponding to the locations, and see nothing at all, or worse, a few scattered houses which would not justify a 'isolated_dwelling', but quite unrelated to your scattered 'hamlet' objects?
maning (2015-12-24 03:47:02+00:00): Hi, MsPalmaGil.  Your edits made reference to "Google maps, Google profile, Google places".  Unfortunately, we are not permitted to use these sources in OSM.  I suggest you remove this data in OSM.  Thank you.
See also: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/2
Gumeg (2016-09-28 10:16:41+00:00): Заметил, что вы living_street тогда ставили по Бингу. Что скорее всего не верно. К такой небольшой тупиковой дороге сокрее подходит service. См. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Dharma-ae (2016-09-28 10:48:59+00:00): Да, highway=service выглядит более подходящим в этом случае. Постарался исправить. Хотя, подробных инструкция как обозначать улицы и проезды в селах я не видел. Упомянутый знак 5.21 встречается очень редко даже в Барнауле, не говоря уже о деревнях.
Gumeg (2016-09-28 14:12:06+00:00): Понимаю. Соглашение было принято для единообразия, проект международный. Можно дополнительно добавить тег living_street=yes, если фактически улица относится к внутридворовым проездом, где схожие правила действует как и под знаком 5.21. Я так обычно делаю..
marc__marc (2020-10-15 08:06:06+00:00): Hello,
can you review the survey:date and source:date to 1) use the correct format YYYY.-MM-DD and add the missing digit for the year :)
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2020-10-15 08:06:23+00:00): for ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233361014
imagico (2020-10-15 13:18:08+00:00): Hello Marc,

I don't have the original data available any more so i don't know if this error was already in there or if it is the result of the conversion process and the actual dates could be reconstructed from the source data.

While i agree that using ISO date format for the date tags is advisable this is not a requirement and not universal practice in use of these tags.  And for survey:date it was not even documented as a suggested rule back when the import was made.

As useful as the survey date is in particular in polar regions it is fair to say i think that seven years after the import and with up-to-date image sources in good quality being much more widely available now if some existing data represents the 2000 state or the 2010 state (which is about the most common range of survey dates in the ADD 6.0 at the coast and outside the Antarctic peninsula) is of only very minor importance.
marc__marc (2020-10-15 13:55:08+00:00): about the format : if you use 01-12-06, it's 1 dec 2006 ? 12 jan 2006 ? 06 dec 2001 ? it is indeed a pity that the wiki only use "should" and not an obligation. probably a thread to be discussed on tagging

about the truncated dates, what seems best to you ? 
- delete the truncated dates since it is unusable/incorrect?
- replace by 2000..2010 (format proposed in the documentation of the check_date key (but not in the documentation of the survey:date key to specify that the date is in this range)
- replace by "before 2013"? (same as for the previous proposal)
imagico (2020-10-15 21:54:26+00:00): No reformatting of the date information was done during the import so those tags are as they are in the source data - which is not consistent and as you point out in parts ambiguous.  In some cases the possibilities can be narrowed down through other information available, for example in case of the way you linked to there is a note "Digitized from LIMA" - which means it has to be 1999-2003.

I see no real use in a mechanical edit here.  The main use of that data is as possibly helpful to mappers editing in the area and for this purpose a mechanical edit is not in any way helpful.
msevilla00 (2016-12-29 15:33:45+00:00): Quizá sea más conveniente usar una hilera de aŕboles para los árboles que rodean el paseo del río. ¿qué te parece?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree%20row?uselang=en
Un saludo
Miguel
robertogeb (2017-01-09 19:44:06+00:00): Hola Miguel. 

Tienes razón, hace 3 años que hice ese cambio y en ese momento no conocía la opción de hilera de árboles. Gracias por la nota,  siempre estoy dispuesto a aprender
eggie (2018-03-10 07:02:00+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. daarom..alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mueschel (2023-05-17 18:27:46+00:00): Hi,
I found some old tracks with a strange tag: "subdi1name". Could you check that?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233408945/history
kubahahaha (2022-12-05 00:22:35+00:00): Jesteś pewien tego kamieniołomu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3462867
evod (2015-06-13 12:37:29+00:00): Sorry, die meisten Wege auf denen du Radfahren hier erlaubt hast sind reine Fußwege. Durch den Ostarrichi-Park und den Sigmund-Freud-Park jedenfalls. Ich hab das wieder zurückgeändert.