piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evod (2023-07-31 18:51:04+00:00): Hi, ich habs geändert weil wie du auch sagst die Beschilderung völlig unklar ist bzw. in Wien eigentlich Fahrverbot in Parks gilt. Vielleicht ist es auf Übersichtsplänen des Parks erwähnt?

Aber füg es gern wieder hinzu, super, dass du die Info von der MA28 bekommen hast.

LG! Markus
user1572739 (2023-08-01 03:14:33+00:00): Danke! Das Fahrverbot in Parks war auch mein Argument. Das steht auch auf den hellgrünen Stelen überall in den Parks, von denen eine sogar direkt neben dem Weg an der Ecke Janis-Joplin-Promenade steht. Daher habe ich meine Anfrage ursprünglich an die MA42 geschickt, aber das ging dann wohl durch mehrere Abteilungen. In der Antwort der MA28 hieß es dann auch, dass der Weg aufgrund der aktuellen Flächenwidmung gar nicht Teil des Seeparks ist. Sehr kompliziert. :-D Leider finde ich die entsprechenden Bestimmungen zu solchen Details nicht, d.h. woran genau man das nun erkennen müsste, auch nicht in der StVO. Aber ich werde es nun mit entsprechendem Hinweis umtaggen. LG
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:16:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10102654101/history has fixme:type = метеостанция that was added in this edit
Is it an attempt to map weather monitoring station?

Would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station fit? Probably tagging would be monitoring:weather=yes + man_made=monitoring_station
4004 (2022-10-16 22:37:31+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а откуда данные?
eggie (2022-10-15 09:31:00+00:00): Hoi space..
Probeer svp het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden...
Dus uploaden in meer aparte changesets.
Mvg
Eggie
spacepixels (2022-10-15 13:01:16+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Ik gebruik de app StreetComplete, en als ik deze changeset zie neem ik aan dat deze alle edits bundelt in een changeset zodra ik op upload klik. Ik zal voortaan eerst uploaden voor ik iets in een ander gebied doe.
eggie (2022-10-15 13:05:52+00:00): Top!
Dat is wel handig voor osm validators.
Die gebouwen specificeren gaat meestal wel goed.. maar met add cycleway zien we veel fouten. Track.. lane.. shared_lane.

Mapse
Eggie
bxl-forever (2022-10-15 16:00:15+00:00): Hello,

The name of this place was discussed several times in the past.  I remember setting "noname=yes" explicitely on this area because this name is just a colloquial name but is not official.  You won’t find any street sign here and you won’t find it on any official map.  I recently took a picture of the map at the entrance of the park and this name is not there either.

If you want to keep the name, it would be wise to remove the "noname" tag from it, because you’ve just created an invalid situation in the database.

Any thoughts?
jevdplas (2022-10-15 16:23:49+00:00): Hello

I was unaware of this discussion. I've reverted the change by removing the name again. It indeed does not seem to be an official name, though it seems to be a name used commonly to refer to this square (e.g., in newspapers). 

Nonetheless, if a colloquial name is commonly used, one may wonder why it is not mentioned on the map. People may refer to this square like this, and find it useful information. Though I'm not aware of a special tag to use to refer to colloquial names, and I'm not aware of how this is generally handled on OSM. 

Thanks for your comment.
bxl-forever (2022-10-16 09:57:54+00:00): This is what alt_name is for.
traveleditor (2022-10-15 13:46:23+00:00): Hello, it's very nice to see you mapping. If there are private driveways/roads on the map, you can simply add the "access=private" tag (this will indicate that these roads are private).

Don't see this message as a problem. I know that you are new to this and I have experienced this problem too, when I started mapping. I will revert this changeset and add the necessary tags for you. 

If you need help from me, don't hesitate to send a message.
SzymonH (2022-10-16 07:43:55+00:00): Wandalizm w relacjach tramwajowych. Skąd linia 9 na Orkana?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-15 09:44:32+00:00): Ciao. Nel tag name devono essere inseriti i nomi propri delle feature (se esistono), non una descrizione degli stessi. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127561244
Spush (2022-10-15 12:27:47+00:00): Ez a szerkesztés szerintem több sebből vérzik.
1. Kerékpárútra nem szoktuk kiírni, hogy kerékpárút mert maga a tag tartalmazza
2. Ahogy nézem itt a földútra lett ráhúzva a kerékpárút ami fedi egymást (szerkesztő nem hoz fel erre hibát, de topológiailag is aggályosnak tartom.)
monotar (2022-11-30 18:26:23+00:00): Hallo,

Welche Gründe gibt es denn hier den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245469925/history für Fahrräder zu öffnen? So war es diesen Sommer NICHT ausgeschildert und es gibt hier auch keine Radwege die durchführen und man das auf Kulanz taggt weil es eine offensichtliche Fehlausschilderung ist. Man kann es bedauern, aber so ist nun einmal die Ausschilderung.
SUPER HEROS 67 (2022-10-17 12:13:02+00:00): Bonjour Randotrain,

Je vous remercie pour votre contribution, suite à votre demande de vérification, j’ai remarqué un oubli (surement de votre part) de classification d’un segment, je me suis permis de lui mettre le classifié comme un chemin.

Si vous avez besoin de conseil je vous invite a créé un sujet sur le forum OpenStreetMap France : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Si vous souhaitez discuter avec les contributrices et contributeurs d’OpenStreetMap en Alsace je vous invite à rejoindre le groupe telegram via le lien suivant : https://t.me/OSM_Alsace

Bonne journée

SUPER HEROS 67
@Di (2022-10-19 11:56:24+00:00): Данный объект был нарисован по gps трекам, поэтму рекомендую в следующий не портить нарисованные другими лицами не имея достоверных источников данных
ModIboR (2022-10-19 15:17:32+00:00): Имеются сомнения в правильности проведения записи треков.
GPS трекер сертифицирован, поверен?
Сколько спутников было при позиционировании GPS трекера в момент записи трека?
Трек записывался при движении по центру проезжей части или по внешнему радиусу?

Не рекомендую, в следующий раз ссылаться на данные "NO NAME" GPS трекера.
@Di (2022-10-19 16:34:07+00:00): 2022_10_19T130741.gpx

Трек записывался на мобильный телефон, в разное время, несколько дней. (в ОСМ Загружен только последний трек) 
Съемка велась центру проезжей части (линии разметки)
jeslop (2022-10-17 16:42:35+00:00): Saludos rudi_2008. ¿Qué has querido representar en este nodo? Tal y como está no ofrece ninguna información.

Hi rudi_2008, what did you want to represent in this node? As is, it does not provide any information.

Regards.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
rudi_2008 (2022-10-18 11:45:53+00:00): I di it by Osmand, and is was not possible to store more infos, I will complete it.
jeslop (2022-10-18 12:09:33+00:00): Thanks rudi_2008

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
jeslop (2022-10-18 12:12:59+00:00): Sorry about this again, but german is not a language that is usually spoken in Galicia. Maybe an name:de would be better? assuming that's really his real name

Thanks again.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
francians (2022-10-15 09:50:44+00:00): Ciao, il nome è già sulla relazione e non va ripetuto sui sentieri... Hai avuto modo di leggere quanto ti avevo scritto nell'ultimo changeset?
fndoder (2023-09-08 17:20:01+00:00): Сейчас уже можно на trunk менять?
А то непонятный разрыв trunk выходит в М-12.

Или там есть всё ещё какие-то причины объезжать этот участок трассы?
literan (2023-09-09 12:07:31+00:00): уже поменяли
dvdhoven (2022-10-15 14:03:26+00:00): Ik heb weer de Gaarderweg doorgeknipt, net als gisteren doorverbonden over de afslaande route W17-W18

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
keesm (2022-10-16 09:32:17+00:00): Bedankt Dick, die heb ik iniderdaad over het hoofd gezien  terwijl ik wel de popup van de relaties kreeg en daar wellicht niet goed de keuzes voor bewaren heb aangevinkt. . 
Gr.
Kees
eggie (2022-10-15 11:26:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip   Je zou de BAR Bistro op het gebouw en het liefst op de adresnode kunnen plaatsen.
Het terras kun je taggen met leisure=outdoor_seating op een vlak of node.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-15 11:29:52+00:00): Dag Henk  Klopt email=info@kleinecamping.eu nog steeds?

MVG
eggie
Henk-pcc (2022-10-15 12:27:11+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
email is nu campingfrusselt@gmail.com
wij zijn de beheerders van de camping en de bistro
eggie (2022-10-15 12:47:37+00:00): Oke.. pas je het zelf aan ter Leering ende Vermaeck?..
Mapse
Eggie
Frans S (2022-10-15 10:37:24+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- 
Here you mapped a road over an existing road ( tagged as highway=unclassified, which is the correct tag here), and tagged it is as"primary"road.
So you tagged this as a major highway !
btw, this road was already mapped, but not visible to you because on your task there were no nodes. When you enlarged your download area, you could see the road
Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127563328
Frans S (2022-10-15 10:41:06+00:00): Hi, Another remark.
You tagged an irrigation canal as a river.
Wrongly tagged. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127563328
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-15 10:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127563587 where the changeset comment is: Reverting my revert, which was in error
Warin61 (2022-10-19 23:24:39+00:00): Hi,

The JOSM validator would have identified 'self crossing ways' as a warning .. these should be fixed before upload. I pick them up from an OSM QA tool, see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.38409&lat=-35.14381&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The errors are on ways 1096817765, 1096822238, 1096822235 and 1096822227. These have all been last edited by yourself. Would you mind fixing these errors? I believe we learn best by fixing our own errors. 

Let me know if you need help.
KristinaRose (2022-10-20 08:09:46+00:00): I'll fix it. Thanks for letting me know!
oba510 (2022-10-15 14:11:46+00:00): Hi, 

I had added area=yes because this cage is a three-dimensional object, not a simple linear fence.  It extends over the top of home plate.
spughetti (2022-10-15 16:31:31+00:00): Hi oba510,

I see, I assumed someone drew an area instead of a line by accident haha. I've restored the tag.

I've never seen the tag used like this before and will check with the OSM Discord if there's a dedicated tag for this.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-15 22:32:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SekeRob (2022-10-15 11:33:25+00:00): Hi

You had not noticed the forest had disappeared from render view in OSM Carto? Duly correctly, per textbook with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Hi

Non avevi notato che la foresta era scomparsa dal rendering in OSM Carto? In modo debitamente corretto, secondo il metodo di mappatura dei libri di testo con https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Ciao
demon_box (2022-10-15 11:43:47+00:00): Sorry, thanks very much!
--enrico
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-15 13:36:08+00:00): No, this building is not there anymore. Reverting the change.
David Sn (2022-10-15 11:09:55+00:00): Źródło jest niedostępne, linie zastępcze będą dodane czy raczej nie?
SzymonH (2022-10-15 20:46:16+00:00): Niemal wszystkie relacje autobusowe są do poprawki, bo mają masę błędów. Wzoruj się na innych liniach, które niedawno dodawałem, albo jak masz pytania to odezwij się do mnie.
SzymonH (2022-10-17 08:27:07+00:00): Skoro nie odpowiadasz, to poprawiłem wszystko za ciebie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127656224 Na przyszłość - jeżeli nie umiesz czegoś dobrze dodać to zachęcam do rozpoczęcia dyskusji na polskim Discordzie lub forum OSM.
Protoxenus (2022-12-05 15:17:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
Protoxenus (2022-12-05 15:17:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
O Fim (2022-12-21 20:28:20+00:00): Não entendi o porque da mudança do link Mapillary pode explicar?
user_12500175 (2022-10-15 17:44:37+00:00): Danke fürs Eintragen, habs noch etwas ergänzt
Nawfal85 (2022-10-15 12:15:45+00:00): ممكن معلومات الموقع لكي يتم ترتيب موقف باص الخط بشكل أكثر نظامي
highflyer74 (2022-12-05 19:37:25+00:00): Auch hier: das sind keine Namen...
Anil Basnet (2022-10-21 03:06:54+00:00): Wrong tagging of road. A motorway is not the one in which motorcycle or motorcar can run, a motorway is a very high-speed road. Actually, there are no motorways in Nepal. 
Please read this wiki to understand more about highway tagging and do map accordingly.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
ivanbranco (2022-10-15 15:42:24+00:00): Ciao PasqualeD,

scusami eh, ma l'ultima volta che ti ho ricordato (per la quinta volta) di non aggiungere il tag building agli indirizzi hai risposto: "dato che le mappe sono aperte puoi aggiustare tu se vuoi". 

Era esattamente cosa è successo qua, tu avevi aggiunto il tag building nella v1 ed era stato eliminato correttamente da un altro utente nella v2. Perché aggiungerlo nuovamente in questa versione (v3)?
PasqualeD (2022-10-15 15:53:22+00:00): Hai ragione!! Errore di mappatura!
Starò più attento
Buon mapping
MKnight (2022-10-15 18:01:26+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier sämtliche Wege gelöscht, warum?
user_16965345 (2022-10-15 18:48:07+00:00): Hey. Ja, ich habe die footways aus dem Freibad entfernt, da einige davon nicht existierten und Navigation in diesen Fall sehr ungenau (und unnötig?) ist. Ehrlich gesagt war das Entfernen dieser eine 60/40-Entscheidung, deswegen bin ich offen für andere Meinungen.
MKnight (2022-10-15 20:42:26+00:00): Übrig geblieben sind area:* und die sind im Routing (bisher) noch ungenauer. 
Meine persönliche Meinung: man muss keine nicht vorhandenen Wege wo hinmalen, dass irgendein Routing irgendwie funktioniert, aber alles löschen, wo dann hinterher garnix mehr geht, ist noch weniger prall.
user_16965345 (2022-10-15 20:53:18+00:00): Okay, danke fürs Feedback. Ich werde die Wege wieder einzeichnen, wo es Sinn macht.
tastrax (2022-10-28 10:50:17+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Anil Basnet (2022-10-21 02:56:28+00:00): Wrong tagging of road. Please read this and do map accordingly. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:45:27+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.
You mapped a road from a main highway to a remote settlement and tagged it highway=track.
Correct tag is highway=unclassified, and surface =unpaved.
Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127567903
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-16 08:22:14+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10103039602

Thanks.
gurglypipe (2022-10-17 08:56:53+00:00): Heya, is this the officially recommended tagging for lime kilns now? What I’ve found on the wiki seems a little unclear, and seems to suggest either historic=archaeological_site, site_type=lime_kiln or man_made=kiln, historic=yes, product=lime instead.
b-unicycling (2022-10-17 17:22:18+00:00): I was absolutely 100% sure there was an approved tag, but now I cannot find it on the wiki. How very strange. I even made a video about how to map them a year ago, and I usually only do them with some sort of back-up on the wiki.
gurglypipe (2022-10-25 13:01:06+00:00): Perhaps a topic for a new tagging proposal? The tagging for lime kilns does seem quite fragmented already, and they’re quite a common historical site to come across.
b-unicycling (2022-10-25 14:17:41+00:00): I already have two proposals going at the moment, maybe later. I also think I might have started one last year, must check my history.
cytryn (2022-10-16 21:05:45+00:00): Cześć,
Uszczegóławiając linię brzegową zmieniłeś tu przebieg granic administracyjnych:
1) miejscowości Kadyny (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14410850) na odcinku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082972316
2) parku krajobrazowego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4522399) na odcinku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729153061
IMO ta część edycji jest wadliwa i powinna zostać wycofana, bo linie granic administracyjnych są bytami wirtualnymi, które ani nie powinny być łączone z przebiegiem innych "fizycznych" obiektów, ani też "dopasowywane" do aktualnego, dość zmiennego (często wręcz zmiennego wraz z poziomem wody) przebiegu linii brzegowej - formalna granica miejscowości nie zależy przecież od poziomu lustra wody ;) dlatego powinna pozostać nienaruszona w swoim dotychczasowym przebiegu.
Pozdrowienia
Grass-snake (2023-01-26 15:52:18+00:00): Добрый день, извините за беспокойство, появились вопросы по телекоммуникационным вышкам (не только по этому пакету правок, в том числе и по другим Вашим объектам):

1. Ключ location=* обычно используется для расположения относительно уровня земли. Для того, чтобы обозначить, что это (стенд/видеокамера/табличка/…) закреплено на платформе, обычно используется support=*.
Предлагаю заменить location=mast на support=mast (и для других значений, которые не описаны на странице ключа location, тоже хотел заменить).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:support
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:location

2. Возможно ли заменить сочетание man_made=antenna+antenna:type 	mobile_phone
на man_made=mast/tower+communication:mobile_phone=yes ?
Очень хотел заменить вышки операторов сотовой связи и привести их в единый стиль. Если позволите, я хотел произвести замену.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dcommunication
Steve_32 (2023-01-30 23:52:12+00:00): Grass-snake, привет.
1. Ключ location, я взял в оборот, только по тому, что увидел, что какие-то антены уже с ним обозначены. Можно сказать - первый попавшийся. support здесь, судя по описанию, конечно более уместен.
Но сейчас посмотрел статистику использования, и вот что получается: конкретно с man_made=antenna, location используется 4019 раз, support - 42. Ну даже и не знаю... А надо ли менять??

2. Антены я использовал в тех случаях, если они стоят на крыше, на небольших опорах, недотягивающих до мачт, или если на одном столбе находится несколько сотовых операторов. Во втором случае, я делал несколько точек, очень близко друг к другу. Одна из них - man_made=mast/tower, а остальные man_made=antenna. Просто я не придумал лучшего способа их обозначить(
Если использовать только man_made=mast/tower, то как обозначить всех операторов, находящихся на вышке?
Grass-snake (2023-01-31 03:08:12+00:00): Вы правы, я смотрел на статистику man_made=mast (там примерно одинаково support и location), думал будет лучше использовать единый ключ. И про несколько антенн на одной вышке тоже не подумал.
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:22:19+00:00): See also my comment on changeset 127572242
These mappings are rather sloppy.
Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127570502
Plaws (2024-01-22 14:45:30+00:00): Hello ! Concernant la pharmacie Lafayette, je vois qu'il y a un tag man_made:surveillance mais il semblerait, d'après le wiki que ça soit un tag utilisé pour taguer les éléments de surveillance (et non pour dire que le bâtiment possède une caméra).

De ma compréhension, s'il s'agit d'une caméra extérieure, il faut faire un autre noeud.
Si c'est pour indiquer que le commerce est vidéo surveillé à l'intérieur, je ne sais pas comment l'indiquer.

Dispo en MP pour en discuter !
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-15 14:57:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942857209
Added an extension here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127574193

This building has been extended on its east end (the side which you mapped), see regular Esri or Maxar Premium.

(PS: Maxar currently may be more up-to-date than Esri depending on where you look.)
craghead (2022-10-15 17:02:54+00:00): Hi. Not sure what the problem is that you highlight? Do you wish me to check again that the amendment is correct?
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-15 21:06:11+00:00): It's so you know I've made changes to something you've contributed. This way we can give each other feedback and avoid edit conflicts.

This is to check the following
1) Does the fact there's an extension check out with your local knowledge? If not, you may let me know.
2) Does the mapped extension look ok? If not, you could make changes to it yourself and let me know.

A reply is appreciated, but otherwise you may ignore this comment.
SekeRob (2022-12-14 12:41:41+00:00): Hi,

I don't speak German and you don't speak italian I'm sure given the CS comment, BUT, your 'erstserfassung' of the 'Alpine watershed" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14461262 is flagged by OSM Inspector with an unclosed boundary alert. Do you have any plans to continue the capture of this watershed area of this now 2 months old entry?

ciao
luschi (2022-12-14 18:27:29+00:00): Hi,     
I do not changed anything at the "Alpin watershed"!     
In this changeset I added the relation for the "Parco Naturale Vedrette di Ries-Aurina" and because of cutting the borders from Italy, the relation(Alpine ...) was also cut.     
As you can see in the history from that relation I dont changed any thing in the tagging. After my "Ersterfassung" was only added 2 additional ways to this relation because of cutting existing ways.      

Maybe this watershed should not be mapped as a boundary, but for this I am the wrong person to discuss with....     
Maybe the user what initially added this to OSM can help you...

regards