piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapman44 (2020-04-18 20:53:51+00:00): These driveways should not have been deleted so this changeset is being reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83442890
user_5359 (2020-04-13 04:46:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
Chadder (2020-04-13 12:19:56+00:00): Thanks for the help! House numbers that were missing have been added
mapman44 (2020-04-13 05:31:06+00:00): Please don't delete roads unless they actually do not exist. If there is a gate closing off part of a road, then just add the gate but don't delete the rest of the road. Traffic that is allowed through the gate may use the service roads past the gate. This changeset is being reverted.
aharvey (2020-04-14 08:08:57+00:00): looks like you've accidentally dragged the address node here
bertboy (2020-04-14 10:00:04+00:00): Thanks aharvey for your watchful eye! Yes this was an accident. I have corrected it now.
mapman44 (2020-04-13 05:20:29+00:00): Thanks for adding the park but you might want to adjust it to include just the park area and not the parking area around it.
Kale Adams (2020-04-13 05:58:54+00:00): Fixed! Thanks for the feed back
Mark R Naird (2020-05-22 19:29:20+00:00): Are these buildings all hand-drawn? Kudos!
user_9347240 (2020-05-22 22:01:55+00:00): Yup, they are. If you are interested in contributing your time, I plan to continue accurately mapping the entirety of Eugene.
mapman44 (2020-04-13 05:16:18+00:00): Hello, Erik_d, and thanks for adding the stop signs. For them to function correctly though they need tags that indicate which road/direction they restrict. Here's the Wiki page that explains how to do that:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-13 06:28:14+00:00): Hi pjrice4, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind naming the following way with your name? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=83444750

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pjrice4 (2020-04-13 15:35:03+00:00): Well, its what I call the structure, but if that is against normal protocol, I will delete the name. Thanks!
maraf24 (2020-04-14 17:43:40+00:00): Hej
W tym zestawie są liczne błędy, np. duplikat Biedronki oraz opisy w nazwach POI.
Czy znasz zasady, jakimi się należy kierować przy takich edycjach?
mapman44 (2020-04-13 05:07:25+00:00): Hello, pjrice4, and thanks for your interest in map editing with OSM. You made a lot of very small moves of the houses on your block so you may want to make sure you have the satellite imagery you're using (Bing, in this case) aligned to the existing mapping in the area. Here's a Wiki page that explains how to do that:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
pjrice4 (2020-04-13 05:26:14+00:00): Thanks!  Sorry, probably got a bit ahead of myself, I figured the mapsets were aligned.  Is there an easy way to revert all my changes and I'll try with a correct background?
mapman44 (2020-04-13 05:42:04+00:00): No problem. Believe me, I did exactly the same thing when I was a new editor. I'll revert your edits so you can start fresh. Happy mapping! If you have questions, and you can't find the answer in the Wiki, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks.
mapman44 (2020-04-13 16:14:42+00:00): I reverted this changeset but you may have to fix a couple of houses. You'll have to fix the other changesets sets too.

Here's some good reading: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-03 06:17:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17097276/history

Why you think it is highway=unclassified? Do you think it matched requirements at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified ? What you meant by surface=track?
rsavoye (2023-04-03 06:37:51+00:00): It was a typo, looks like you already removed it. Most County roads aren't tracks, but unclassified in a remote area like this. Whether it's 4x4 only is up to the driver. Probably better to assume it's a track so people don't try to drive it in a normal car, I don't remember the specific details when I was camping there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-03 08:04:51+00:00): note that highway=track is not "requires 4x4" - some highway=track may be paved

highway=track is rather indicating that road serves as land access road (typically forestry or farming road, but may also have other functions), not linking settlements
rsavoye (2023-04-03 08:19:24+00:00): It is a road in a national forest, and doesn't connect any settlements at all. There are many roads like this in that remote part of Colorado, primarily used by hunters, fisherman, and campers. If it's possible to drive in a normal car, I usually use unclassified, if it needs a high clearance vehicle then I usually use track. Course the difference between the two is subtle, and depends on the driver.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-03 11:48:04+00:00): > If it's possible to drive in a normal car, I usually use unclassified, if it needs a high clearance vehicle then I usually use track. 

Please, add at least surface=* tags

highway=unclassified and highway=track are not distinguished by passability for regular vehicles, highway=track surface=asphalt exist (at least in Europe) and could be used by regular cars, some highway=unclassified surface=mud or surface=dirt require 4x4
rsavoye (2023-04-03 11:58:32+00:00): In this part of Colorado most of the roads are dirt. Some maintained, some not. The difference is whether they can be driven with or without a high-clearance vehicle. Most of these are for access deep into public land. If you reference my talk at SOTM-US last year, I'm a huge fan of adding the surface tag, as it's an important detail for emergency response. Also smoothness is important, but that needs ground-truthing to be really sure.
◪ Jarv (2020-04-13 09:18:07+00:00): If you are going to be making changes in the UK, please describe the changes in English.
trigpoint (2020-04-13 12:07:23+00:00): And make them meaningful. Data Change is not helpful.
mapman44 (2020-04-13 04:54:38+00:00): Thanks for the edit. You may want to capitalize the first letter of each word in the name, i.e. Biben's Ace Hardware.
Necessarycoot72 (2020-04-13 06:53:07+00:00): thanks. thought i did that.
mapman44 (2020-04-13 04:44:36+00:00): Hello, MysticKitten04, and thank you for your interest in map editing with OSM. Good edits and editors are always welcome. Before you move more streets you may want to make sure you have the satellite imagery you are using aligned to the existing streets. Here's the Wiki page that explains all this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery     If you still have questions, please ask. After you get your background imagery aligned properly you may want to think about fixing the streets you moved before. Thanks.
pilsa (2020-04-13 14:32:02+00:00): اینجا همچین لینکی وجود نداره
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83448176
Saeed SJ (2020-04-22 04:21:01+00:00): سلام گزارشات زیادی داشتیم از اینکه اینجا رمپ خروجی بنام سردار سلیمانی احداث شده است و بر اساس این گزارشات لینک رسم شد.
با این حال اگر وجود ندارد حذف کنید. 
ممنون
mapman44 (2020-04-13 13:30:56+00:00): Thanks for your edits. Just a tip...you can square up the corners of buildings by selecting the building and pressing the Q key. Makes them look much neater. Thanks.
MagnusA (2020-04-13 05:16:48+00:00): Looks good. You can add "building=detached" since it's a free standing building. Also consider adding tags for address, "addr:*=*" if possible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83449388
532910 (2020-04-15 11:32:00+00:00): Почему ссылка на speedcamonline.ru, а не официальный гибдд.рф или одобренный wiki mapcam.info?
RusFox (2020-04-15 11:34:03+00:00): Потому что mapcam.info запрещает использовать свои данные, а speedcamonline.ru разрешает. Очевидно же!
osmviborg (2020-04-13 05:57:59+00:00): Sydjylland
ianlopez1115 (2020-04-25 04:09:57+00:00): No issues with reclassification of streets, though highway=track could have been reclassified as highway=service + surface=dirt.
ianlopez1115 (2020-04-25 04:12:20+00:00): *in this instance, rather
B_KSL (2020-04-14 10:55:59+00:00): Uporczywie oznaczasz drogi prowadzące do domów jako track. Po raz kolejny prośba: oznaczaj jako service + driveway
B_KSL (2020-04-14 11:53:47+00:00): I podobnie jak kiedyś usuwasz obszary residential bo Ci coś "zacieniają". Już Ci raz maraf wytłumaczył, że sobie możesz osmanda skonfigurować.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72215776
Sparty0 (2020-05-05 17:30:36+00:00): Zobacz na wiki co zaznaczać jako zabudowa mieszkaniowa. Ten teren nie podlega opisanej tam definicji. Można ją stosować w miastach, na terenach wiejskich powoduje tylko zaszarzenie ekranu np.na smartfonie).
Cytyat: ...Zarys obszaru powinien zaznaczyć granice danej zabudowy mieszkaniowego, a nie zakresu całej miejscowości lub wsi, kiedy nie są one identyczne. ...
Podjazd uważam jest wtedy gdy do budynku prowadzi utwardzona docelowa droga. Natomiast gdy trzeba gumowców żeby do niego dojść to co jest?: podjazd, droga polna, czy ścieżka droga ?
Sparty0 (2020-05-05 17:37:51+00:00): Na smartfonach drogi polne są dobrze widoczne, natomiast podjazdy są prawie niewidoczne. W czasie jazdy często "podjazd" można przejechać i cofka.
B_KSL (2020-05-05 17:58:53+00:00): Ten teren który usunąłeś jak najbardziej odpowiada opisowi w wiki. Nigdzie nie znalazłem nic o twoim "zaciemnianiu". Gdzie znalazłeś że to się w miastach stosuje a na wsi nie? Po raz trzeci: ustaw sobie tak osmanda żeby Ci wyświetlał to co chcesz a nie naginaj mapy (nie kasuj) do swoich potrzeb. Gdzie znalazłeś ten cytat? I co on tu ma do rzeczy? Skasowane obszary nie obejmowały całej wsi. Nie tylko w Dziurdziowie. Dokładnie to samo odwaliłeś w Zahoczewiu, Zerdence, Nowosiółkach itd.
"Podjazd uważam jest wtedy gdy do budynku prowadzi utwardzona docelowa droga..." To źle uważasz. Kategoria drogi zależy od jej przeznaczenia i przeważającego sposobu używania a nie od jej nawierzchni. Droga pokryta tartanem którą się tylko zwozi siano albo gnój będzie tylko track a droga prowadząca do budynków mieszkalnych to driveway - nawet jak jest bagno po kolana. Do oznaczania jakości drogi, jej nawierzchni służą inne znaczniki. Nikogo nie interesuje co Ty widzisz na smartfonie. Zmień amplikację jak Ci obecna nie odpowiada.
B_KSL (2020-05-05 20:42:43+00:00): w powyższym -m  jeszcze raz poczytaj:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:service%3Ddriveway 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrack 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
hsc666 (2020-04-13 08:58:32+00:00): Hallo BenNeppi und herzlich willkommen bei OSM! 
.
Der Eintrag sieht soweit ok aus. Ein paar Anregungen hätte ich noch: 
.
Trägt der Weg wirklich den Eigennamen "Waldweg", d.h. da steht ein Schild, welches den Weg mit diesem Namen ausweist? Falls das nur eine Beschreibung ist, entferne den Namen bitte. 
.
Da hast als Oberfläche unpaved eingetragen, das sollte nach Möglichkeit genauer beschrieben werden (guck einfach hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dunpaved nach besser geeigneten Einträgen). 
.
Und horse=yes (oder auch no) solle nur gesetzt werden, wenn eine entsprechende Zugangsreglung vorhanden ist. Das Tag sollte nicht benutzt werden,  um die "Eignung" zu beschreiben. Also wenn keine Beschilderung vor Ort ist, einfach weglassen.
.
Und falls Du Fragen hast, melde Dich einfach hier wieder!
.
VG
hsc666
berndw (2020-04-13 10:26:12+00:00): Hallo BenNeppi

Auch hier einen Einwand

Name ist nur der Nae und nicht anderes, beschreibende Namen sind unerwünscht.

Ein Waldweg ist entweder ein track, wenn für zweispurige Fahrzeuge geeignet, oder ein path, für Wanderer o.ä.
Zusätzlich zu den Werten track oder path gibt es zusätzliche Angaben, die stehen auf der jeweiligen Wikiseite.
Es wäre schön, wenn Du diese Hinweise beachten würdest

Danke
Bend
berndw (2020-04-13 10:31:33+00:00): Noch etwas
access=no verbietet den Zugang für alles was nicht explizit erlaubt ist.
Bei Waldwegen ist vehicle|motor_vehicle=forestry ausreichend, da für foot und bicycle keine zusätzliche Angabe erforderlich sind. Ausgenommen sind explizite Beschilderungen. horse=yes sollte nur gesetzt werden, wenn eine entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden ist.
Auch diese Regeln werden im Wiki beschrieben

Bernd
berndw (2020-04-13 10:21:37+00:00): Hallo BenNeppi

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Darf ich fragen, woher die Namen der Weiher stammen?
Falls Du sie bei der Konkurrenz abgeschrieben hast, widerspricht das den Regeln von OSM. In diesem Fall entferne bitte die Namen wieder.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright ist das was Du lesen solltest.

Ansonsten stell bitte Deine Hintergrundbilder auf ESRI um, Bing ist in der Region nicht allzu lagegenau.
Für Fragen stehe ich zur Verfügung
Bernd
berndw (2020-05-03 09:16:41+00:00): Hallo BenNeppi

Bist Du da?

Es wäre schön, wenn Du auf Fragen antworten würdest.

Ich werde Deine Beiträge überprüfen/zurücksetzen lassen, wenn Du bis Freitag, 07.05.2020 nicht antwortest.

Bernd
berndw (2020-04-13 10:33:48+00:00): siehe vorheriges Changeset, der Kommentar dort gilt auch hier!
highflyer74 (2020-05-14 20:23:50+00:00): Moin!

Kannst Du Dir diese Stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83452473#map=19/52.11648/9.56723 noch einmal ansehen?

Hier liegen zwei Wege übereinander.

Kleiner Tipp: probier' mal JOSM statt Potlatch. JOSM erkennt viele potentielle Fehler, so dass Dinge wie dieser gar nicht erst hochgeladen werden.

Melde Dich gern, wenn Du Fragen hast!
highflyer74 (2020-06-11 08:34:31+00:00): Moin!

Ich hatte vor ca einem Monat diesen CS kommentiert. Leider hast Du weder das Problem repariert, noch Dich hier gemeldet. Bitte beachte, dass es notwendig ist, miteinander zu kommunizieren, denn nur so funktioniert ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt.

Südöstlich von obiger Problemstelle (die ich jetzt repariert habe) verläuft der Weg in Schlangenlinien, die auf den verfügbaren Luftbildern nicht zu sehen sind. Kannst Du bitte bestätigen, dass dies so korrekt ist?
berndw (2020-04-13 10:38:27+00:00): Ein Trampelpfad kann kein Fußweg sein
Für highway=footway sollte die entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden sein, auch die Wege meist in irgendeiner Form befestigt, Asphalt, Platten o.ä.
highway=path ohne foot|bicycle=* wäre hier ausreichend. 

Achso, näheres steht im Wiki ;-)

SCNR
Bernd
Kovoschiz (2020-04-13 08:58:35+00:00): Please don't remove information by changing `crossing=traffic_signals` to `crossing=marked`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83452816
osmviborg (2020-04-13 06:42:24+00:00): Fyn
user_8655426 (2020-04-15 11:00:38+00:00): こんばんは。浜松市の Mappin' Jack Flash と申します。
航空自衛隊浜松基地の編集で、「レンダラーのためのタグ付け」が多く行われています。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%83%AC%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%83%A9%E3%83%BC%E3%81%AE%E3%81%9F%E3%82%81%E3%81%AE%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B0%E4%BB%98%E3%81%91

航空機、土手、芝生などがこれに当たると思います。適切なタグを調べて修正をお願いいたします。
「芝生」とされたエリアは、国土地理院の航空画像から判断して、地表(草地)である可能性が非常に高いです。浜松の航空画像は春に撮影されていますが、基地内は公園やゴルフ場の芝生と比べて緑加減が少ないからです。
user_8655426 (2020-04-16 11:32:13+00:00): 基地内のマッピングと指摘箇所の修正、ありがとうございました。
いつか浜松基地を編集したいと思っていましたが、外周道路周辺以外の現地調査はほぼ不可能なので、どうしようかと考えておりました。

基地の編集についてですが、Bing航空画像や地理院地図からはわからない詳細な情報が多数追加されています。例えば、ゲート、フェンス、建物の種別や階数、施設の名称などです。しかし、それらの編集のもととなった情報源が記入されていません。今後は情報源(source)を追加していただくようお願いいたします。

Key:source
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source

データの情報源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

OSMで利用可能なデータソースは以下のページに記載されています。
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Available_Data
osmviborg (2020-04-13 06:42:47+00:00): Fyn
pio2_122 (2020-04-13 09:13:01+00:00): landuse=military tu nie pasuje, ponieważ nie jest to stały obszar wojskowy!
mueschel (2020-04-14 12:51:59+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. I just fixed various spelling mistakes of 'destination' and its sub-keys.
TaraV (2020-04-14 12:57:58+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.
I think this can happen due to value or keys of tags being automatically memorized and suggested in JOSM so once you make one typo it is easy to make more of them. I will be more careful in the future.

Thanks,
Tara
Kovoschiz (2020-04-13 09:04:49+00:00): This really shows the applicability of `area=yes`. If the pathway is linear and narrow, a line is more correct and representative, and `area:highway=pedestrian` (+ `highway=footway` + `area=yes`) could be used. On the result side, most applications don't support area routing either, so a line would be added as in here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83456862
Sowa1980 (2020-05-19 03:01:37+00:00): Привет, почему было удалено отношение и зачем было сцеплять в место этого лини по точкам, прошу пояснить ваши действия.
FvGordon (2020-05-19 08:57:19+00:00): There was a node near node n7376848961, which made the outline of this area self intersecting. I removed this node (n7376848967) and made this area=yes a closed loop (removed the multipolygon r10971397) and changed area=yes to area:highway=service. I then connected some outer ways of multipolygon r10971430 near this area to become a single line (w789040047 ).
maraf24 (2020-04-14 17:58:37+00:00): Nazwa to raczej "Mamma Mia", reszta to tylko dodatki opisowe do nazwy.
eggie (2020-04-13 08:31:56+00:00): Dag DLMax.. Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je de Suggelaarsestraat vastplakt aan de landuse=resiential van Oss
Plakken kun je voorkomen door tijdens intekenen de linker alt toets te gebruiken.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-13 08:32:34+00:00): Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83459163
eggie (2020-04-13 08:39:00+00:00): 'k Heb het gelijk maar even losgemaakt. 
Gr eggie
DLMax (2020-04-13 10:26:07+00:00): Oeps ! Dankjewel!!
eggie (2020-04-13 11:09:24+00:00): Wanneer je doorzet met OSM dan zou je eens naar editor JOSM kunnen kijken. Je hebt dan veel meer overzicht wat je doet.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Aanbevolen.. 
Gr eggie
Frans S (2020-04-13 10:21:12+00:00): Hello Sabareesh. Thanks for mapping here
I review mappings of new mappers and have some remarks.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key in ID editor. 21 out of 26 buildings you mapped are not squared !
You also ignored the warnings you must have seen before uploading your work
See the issue triangle on the right side menu.
These issues have to be solved before uploading.
Best regards
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:44:54+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
bernardo60 (2021-04-30 00:56:27+00:00): Hi
This way is part of my mountain bike route. It is very steep and eroded, not paved. Not sure on what basis you upgraded it to unclassified. It would be impossible to use by an ordinary car. I revert to track again.
RiverBearings (2021-04-30 19:30:18+00:00): Hello bernardo60,
MooiiRiver is not on our team anymore. Thank you for updating the highway and surface tags for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439329089. Your local knowledge is appreciated.
-RiverBearings
Warin61 (2020-08-22 04:41:36+00:00): Hi,
If your only changing cliff lines why then were relations changed??? 

Note Relation 10121936 has been deleted. This change set has been partial reverted and the relations are restored. The cliff lines should be fine.
RecHeller23 (2020-04-16 09:43:28+00:00): Hi
xmd5a (2020-05-19 11:52:54+00:00): There is tons of broken multipolygons!
mrbaja (2020-05-19 15:08:24+00:00): I'm working on it
mapman44 (2020-04-13 13:05:42+00:00): Thanks for your edits, but before you move a lot of streets you may want to make sure the satellite imagery you are using is aligned to the existing street in the area. Please read this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
mapman44 (2020-04-13 13:02:36+00:00): Thanks for your edit but please leave comments that describe your edit a little better. Here'e the Wiki page about that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments     Thanks.
riiga (2020-04-14 06:32:11+00:00): Hi!

What did you base your info on when adding this supposed landing site? 

This is a former helipad that has been converted to a bicycle parking. The helipad is now on the roof of the hospital. Please do not make changes using old imagery and no local knowledge.
riiga (2020-04-17 20:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.
TeodoraT (2020-04-13 10:18:13+00:00): I forgot to add the tags:
#adobeglobalmapathon
#adoberomania
user_5359 (2020-04-19 09:51:23+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key hwpi ?
Bernhard Hiller (2020-04-20 16:26:38+00:00): That's a temporary tag for highways. The group of farangs mapping in Thailand still could not agree upon a reasonable highway tagging scheme resembling international highway tagging standards.
mueschel (2020-04-14 10:49:00+00:00): Hi,
could you check these nodes? Several have some foreign tags, e.g.:
Location = ( 45.685787342, 9.671795116)
SezioneISTAT = 425
francians (2020-04-13 09:14:52+00:00): Ciao!
Grazie per il contributo... Locality significa "città fantasma"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality

Meglio usare Hamlet...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet

Mi faccia sapere se ha dei dubbi.
Saluti
Francesco
user_5359 (2020-04-13 09:26:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
TeodoraT (2020-04-13 10:18:32+00:00): I forgot to add the tags:
#adobeglobalmapathon
#adoberomania
berndw (2020-04-13 09:56:22+00:00): Hallo Boensch80

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Bitte stell Deine Hintergrundbilder auf ESRI um, da die Bing-Bilder in der Region nicht genau positioniert sind. Als Referenz kannst Du sie verwenden, da sie teilweise aktueller sind.

Ansonsten habe ich nichts zu bekritteln ;-)

Bernd
Nmxosm (2020-04-14 07:19:54+00:00): Hallo Mingo-OF,

warum hast du bei den beiden Notausgängen aus dem Mapping als Fläche jeweils eine Node gemacht? Die Fläche war meines Erachtens die genauere Information.

VlG Nmxosm
Mingo-OF (2020-04-14 11:43:29+00:00): Hast recht - habe es wieder geändert.
Gibt leider keine genaue Beschreibung wie man solche Notausstiege kennzeichnet.
TeodoraT (2020-04-13 10:18:50+00:00): I forgot to add the tags:
#adobeglobalmapathon
#adoberomania
TeodoraT (2020-04-13 10:19:00+00:00): I forgot to add the tags:
#adobeglobalmapathon
#adoberomania
stephankn (2020-10-17 10:32:19+00:00): way 665184558 is certainly no tertiary. I changed that. Probably it came from a bad Kaart edit nearby. What is that undocumented "hwpi" tag you are adding?