piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dan980 (2016-12-30 16:38:35+00:00): Sorry I wrote in Italian, I thought you were a sardinian mapper from Arborea.

Anyway

1. This is a rule for mapping street names in Italy, despite what you see on the sign: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade It is an application of the general rule that abbreviations should be converted into the full name. The italian Government is forcing the municipalities to fix their street names following the same standard, but updating the street signs is gonna take a long time due to budget reasons.
2. Sorry, Italian signs are often misleading. A lot :( This is why often you have to deduce the street from the house number system: the left side of a road has odd numbers only, the right side even numbers only, plazas have continuous numbers. You can find streets where the numbers start from scratch, but the sign is not there. Example: 44-46-48-1-2-3-4-5-50-52-54 ---->  street-plaza-street . Some cities like Genoa  have a red-black housenumber system, that make it even more complex.
3. Many doors do not have a number sign, but this does not mean they don't have any, they are not "fictional". Every ten years the towns make an updated list of the entrances, then they should add the missing plates. But sometimes this does not happen (again, budget problems), so the new houses remain without a plate for years. But they do have a number, used by the mail, the couriers, and so on.
4. Official data *is* reality. If the town renames a street and does not update the plate, the name is the newer. There are tags like "old_name" and "note" to take into account this situations.
5. Surveyed data is of course better. I surveyed my whole hometown and the nearest city. Importing helps to deal with large amount of data that would not be added easily. Buildings and house numbers are a typical import. By the way, the imported addresses where surveyed by real people for Regione Sardegna. The quality and the age of their work is very different from town to town, so it is important to check it and compare it with existing OSM data, first using tools like OSM inspector and Conflate, then with local survey whenever possible. So your work *is* very important and appreciated, don't give up. :)
pyram (2016-12-31 10:55:06+00:00): Official data is reality *after* the town renamed the plate ;-)

What do you think about "official_name" for imported names?

I do not need a map showing any name I cannot find on ground.

My work is not important: See your note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225797845/history

By the way: http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/disclaimer.html says "...Possono quindi essere scaricati o utilizzati solo per uso personale e non commerciale..."
Maybe I translate wrong. But I think this use is not compatible to our license. OSM is also commercial used .
dan980 (2016-12-31 11:18:37+00:00): imports where autorized by Regione Sardegna. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
pyram (2016-12-31 12:27:37+00:00): Thanks. This is the better source than "(http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/disclaimer.html)" ;-)
luschi (2017-01-24 21:04:21+00:00): Hi,     
please update OsmAnd to latest version, because "user_defined_other=*" is not a correct key for OSM
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 15:11:08+00:00): agregue solo puntos de relevancia pública
Commodoortje (2016-12-31 08:26:14+00:00): trtee_row►tree_row
corrected typo (3x)
island ►islet aangepast
► unclosed way corrected
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8ykrf3tt9qhx6c/2016-12-31_09-20-48.png?raw=1
user_2842609 (2016-12-30 00:12:02+00:00): Il y a autant de puits dans cette petite zone ?
az09 (2017-01-05 15:53:24+00:00): Так нельзя делать. Откатываю.
literan (2016-12-30 12:27:29+00:00): в этом месте на снимке трава, попробуйте еще раз, а это придется откатить. К тому же при чем здесь магазин еды для собак?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 35884028, 35884310, 35884405, 35884576, 35884639, 35884695, 35922493, 35922551, 35922628, 35922748, 35926754, 35926902, 35927040, 35927132, 35927238, 35927597, 35927666, 35927680, 35927725, 35944330, 35944416, 35944523, 35944608, 35967598, 35967653, 35967927, 35967948, 36444751, 36444832, 36444929, 36444997, 36445166, 36445204, 36445261, 36445337, 36504370, 36504814, 36504928, 36505022, 36507285, 36507392, 36507641, 36507704, 36507834, 36549216, 36549237, 36549513, 36550529, 36550537, 36571263, 36571348, 36571389, 36571417, 36571449, 36571591, 36571633, 36571724, 36571734, 36571756, 36595067, 36595153, 36616997, 36617073, 36619789, 36619940, 36628022, 36628030, 36628040, 36628093, 36628878, 36631184, 36631207, 36631254, 36631520, 36631688, 36631758, 36631789, 36634714, 36634769, 36634866, 36635128, 36635337, 36682778, 36683153, 36683744, 36700619, 36700800, 36701181, 36737770, 36737880, 36738033, 36738134, 36738548, 36738678, 36798018, 36798169, 36798428, 36839152, 36917597, 36917611, 36917653, 36917747, 36917764, 36917937, 36918167, 36918368, 36918573, 36936204, 36936620, 36936837, 36937020, 36937420, 36937790, 36937851, 36938191, 37187753, 37223466, 37223505, 37223572, 37223892, 37226529, 37226717, 37246522, 37246749, 37246878, 37329382, 37329609, 37329653, 37389692, 37498320, 37498409, 37498788, 37541454, 37541705, 37642756, 37667300, 37667565, 37709507, 37710022, 37710193, 37710337, 37710443, 37870823, 37871150, 37871722, 37955772, 37956241, 38020783, 38020996, 38021552, 38021604, 38040980, 38041063, 38041240, 38041525, 38041581, 38043466, 38064533, 38065001, 38065699, 38096381, 39281663, 41617540, 41617570.
freebeer (2018-06-22 10:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60071789 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
ma-rt-in (2019-05-10 22:10:20+00:00): Hallo,
ein office=goverment ohne Bezeichnung?
vg
Erdrandbewohner (2019-05-11 07:51:23+00:00): Als ich das eingetragen habe, fand ich widersprüchliche Angaben darüber, welche Ämter, Behörden und Dezernate in welchen Gebäuden sitzen. Ich werde nach dem Urlaub nochmal versuchen, näheres herauszufinden.
dgitto (2017-04-16 14:35:10+00:00): forse sarebbero da evitare le abbreviazioni (sent.)
ACS1986 (2017-01-03 12:46:29+00:00): Hi Peter,
Thanks for correcting these crossing tags and apologies for messing them up in the first place. I was going off some rather outdated info in the Wiki. If you notice me consistently doing anything else wrong do let me know.
Kind regards,
Adam
mueschel (2016-12-31 15:20:17+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "food_prone = yes"? You used it several times, but it is not used any where else.

Cheers, Jan
Luuuddooo (2016-12-31 16:02:56+00:00): Hi Jan, thanks a lot for your remark, it's a typo, I wanted to set http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone, I'll correct that.
Cheers, Ludo.
imagico (2017-01-02 14:17:11+00:00): I would consider this essentially mapping for the renderer - beaches do extent below the high water line obviously and natural=tidal_beach is not documented while equivalent established tagging exists (natural=beach + tidal=yes)

If the lowest parts here is still a beach (i.e. wave formed) or a tidal flat i don't know of course.
dmgroom_ct (2017-01-15 11:05:48+00:00): The wiki is very clear that the tag "natural = beach" is only for the part of the beach above the MHW line.

So what you refer to as established tagging is still in contravention of what is expected.
imagico (2017-01-16 11:03:54+00:00): Well - the 'how to map' section on the wiki does not represent common mapping practice here and contradicts the basic definition of natural=beach as a landform.

The wiki by the way currently also says you should tag the part of a beach below the high water line as natural=shoal - which of course does not make much sense.

I would be open to clarifying the wiki in either way but using your concept would both require a lot of change in mapping all over the world and would cause additional problems (like which part of the beach the name tag is to be applied to).
dmgroom_ct (2017-01-17 14:26:32+00:00): I will emnail you via the OSM msg system
trigpoint (2017-01-21 16:16:05+00:00): Please don't do that, it is better to keep these discussion in the open.
Thanks Phl
Noen (2017-01-01 18:28:13+00:00): Hei, og velkommen til OpenStreetMap!
Jeg er ganske sikker på at hele dette området ikke er en park, så jeg det retter tilbake.
Paludal (2017-01-01 18:30:14+00:00): Ganske sikker på at det skogområdet og er park/frilufts.
Noen (2017-01-01 19:46:24+00:00): Joda, det er et friluftsområde ved Ljansdalen her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48831370
Den kunne trengt forbedring.

Men hele dette skogområdet, som strekker seg fra Ljan langs E18 til Rosenholm kan ikke kalles en park.
Paludal (2017-01-01 20:50:05+00:00): Om jeg fikk med området utenfor Ljabrudiagonalen, så er jeg enig, men området innenfor Labrudiagonalen, Herregårdsveien og Ljabruveien, med untak av boligfeltet er etter hva jeg har hørt park, I detminste er leikvollen park og.
Glassman (2016-12-30 03:09:13+00:00): What is the Oberlin? Can you add a tag to describe the feature? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features to get started. Adding a tag to describe the feature will it render on the map as well as help search engines find it.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-31 10:50:48+00:00): Hi Jens. please do not create tags like:
"-" = <empty>
FTA (2017-01-06 04:40:49+00:00): Hi, was there a specific reason you added the banner_url tag? I'm having a difficult time understanding what it represents...the link key given seems to redirect to a travel agency ticket site that is advertising.
Thanks and Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA

Hola, hay alguna razón específica para agregar la etiqueta banner_url? Estoy teniendo un tiempo difícil entender lo que representa...la clave de enlace dada parece redireccionar a un sitio de boleto de agencia de viajes que es la publicidad.
Gracias y feliz cartografía,
Ethan aka FTA
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-03 04:59:55+00:00): Olá,

Gostaria de saber se a intenção foi mapear algum jardim que acompanha a calçada.

Me parece que uma linha contínua não seja a melhor opção.
asclepios (2017-01-03 05:18:26+00:00): Boa noite,
A intenção era mesmo apontar a sequência de árvores robustas que acompanham a calçada. Mas agora que você apontou, isso ocorre com tanta frequência por todo o bairro que não vejo mais motivo para destaca-las. Obrigado pelo comentário.
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:32:59+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:31:45+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:30:42+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:28:54+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:28:17+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:27:07+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:25:03+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:24:12+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:22:56+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:21:10+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:20:25+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:19:31+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:18:11+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:17:38+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:16:51+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:16:12+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:13:40+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:12:58+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:12:18+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
osmviborg (2016-12-30 08:31:00+00:00): Er der nogen grund til at flytte på adressenoden, sålænge den er placeret indenfor den relevante matrikel (danmarksadresser.dk)?
Jørn-osm (2016-12-30 14:08:39+00:00): Det er spildt arbejde at flytte adressenoder manuelt.
Næste gang AWSbot kommer forbi flytter den dem tilbage.

Er der punkter der er forkerte er det nødvendigt at kontakte kommunen.
F.eks. Guldborgvænget 22, 4230 Skælskør.
Så kan kommunen rettet punktet i Danmarks Adresse Register (DAR).
AWSbot henter oplysninger fra DAR via AWS Suiten.

http://danmarksadresser.dk/rapporter-fejl
LarsBG (2016-12-30 17:20:19+00:00): Det er ikke rigtigt. AWSbot tager eller har taget højde for at vi flytter adresse noden lidt. Mener det er inden for 25 meter.
LarsBG (2016-12-30 17:29:55+00:00): Nu har jeg fundet det. 
"Bemærk her kigger kun på lat/lon med 6 decimaler, så hvis en OSM bruger fx
har flyttet noden hen til hus døren flyttes den ikke tilbage igen."
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2016-August/004683.html
Hjart (2016-12-30 17:58:56+00:00): Måske det kunne være en ide at opdatere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Adresser med bl.a. dette
Jørn-osm (2016-12-30 20:55:45+00:00): Det er 6 decimaler efter kommaet. 
Det svarer ca. til 10 cm.
Kan udregnes med Haversine formelen.

Ellers prøv at vælge punktet 976426025 i JOSM.
Ret breddegrad fra 55,249662 til 55,249663.
Længdegrad er uændret  11,3061718.

Tryk ctrl-h, vælg faneblad "Koordinater", her ses at 
punkt 976426025, Guldborgvænget 22, 4230 Skælskør, er flyttet 0,11 m.
Jørn-osm (2016-12-30 22:28:55+00:00): Prøv at kigge på punkt 960249124.
En bruger har flyttet en adressenode mellem version 2 og 3.
AWSbot har flyttet den tilbage 2,24 m mellem version 3 og 4.
Afstanden mellem version 2 og 4 er 0 m.
LarsBG (2016-12-31 06:15:23+00:00): Ud fra teksten troede jeg at det var mere en 10 cm. Men må indrømme at jeg ikke havde styr på formelen for det :-)

Men jeg bliver da lidt bange for at http://danmarksadresser.dk/rapporter-fejl vil bloker mig for at spame dem hvis det skal den vej igennem ....
LarsBG (2016-12-31 06:26:38+00:00): Lige for at følge op på reglerne for placering af husnummer. http://danmarksadresser.dk/file/534981/vejl-bek-ver-2-0-20141211.pdf
Se figur 3
I § 12, stk. 1 præciseres det, at de enkelte dele af adressebetegnelsen skal
fastsættes sådan, at de angiver adgangsvejen frem til den ”ting”, som adressen
hører til.
Adressebetegnelsen vil således fungere som en vejbeskrivelse, som eksempelvis
”Lærkevej 14A, 2. th”, der beskriver den samlede adgangsvej fra ”Lærkevej” gennem
indgangsdøren, som har husnummer ”14A” til den rigtige éntredør, som ligger
på anden sal til højre.
Hvis adressen hører til et ubebygget areal angiver husnummeret adgangsvejen ind
på dette.

Tidligere var reglen, at adressens adressepunkt skulle ajourføres årligt. I den nye
adressebekendtgørelse skal adgangspunktet ajourføres løbende, såfremt der sker
ændringer.
SunnysideUp (2016-12-30 04:25:06+00:00): Based on local knowledge.
pyram (2017-01-01 14:50:14+00:00): 1. Thanks for try to help.

2. I had seen thist note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/836617
Please see there is a difference between park (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark) and private garden.

2. The "highway=footways" should be tagged as "footway=sidewalk" too.
For routing, however, these unrelated ways are useless.
grouper (2017-01-04 21:03:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Some of these paths appear to be going through buildings. Are you able to survey these paths on the ground to verify them? Another option is walking or biking using Mapillary to capture on the ground imagery and paths that can be used to verify / update the paths.
Oberaffe (2016-12-30 10:38:35+00:00): Dear Androsan,
You are adding fictional roads and OSM is for good purpose. Please check your neighbourhood for real names of highways and add them.

Thank you,
Baloo Uriza (2017-08-12 19:10:03+00:00): Seeing a lot, lot of ways in this changeset that were improperly upgraded to trunk when they're not semi-limited expressways...single carriageways only accessible via ramps or dual carriageways with limited surface intersections would be trunks.
johnny_1982 (2017-01-19 20:52:24+00:00): Way 462697377 is an American Football Field? On the satellite images it looks like a Soccer Field (which is also green but completely different). Street to the field is NOT connected to streets (gap).
diegoemilio (2017-01-21 20:27:59+00:00): De facto It is an American Football Field. It's the borrego's field. I studied there, saw my friends play there, and still hosts tournaments. The street is not connected to the field. It's an inner street for the campus, that leads to a parking lot, that is 5-6 meters higher. You have to climb stairs to get to the field.
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
Harald Hartmann (2017-01-02 15:03:47+00:00): Why did you add this POI (node) and with wrong keys (addr:tourism, addr:phone doesn't exists), although der Holiday Inn Express is already there (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164868549) with better, valid and full data/information?
So this looks like an automated imort, where is it discussed? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)
mueschel (2016-12-31 13:33:21+00:00): Hi,
may I ask for the source of data of all these hotels? There are many issues with this data:

- most hotels I checked already exist in the OSM database
- you deleted some existing hotels
- the tagging of the new nodes is wrong. Tags like addr:tourism, addr:phone or addr:name do not exist.
*Martin* (2016-12-30 12:40:10+00:00): Ahoj. Do OpenStreetMap nepatria takéto poznámky.
*Martin* (2016-12-30 12:41:11+00:00): Alebo sa tak naozaj volá?
mavl (2017-10-16 17:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
literan (2016-12-30 11:49:13+00:00): man_made=cutline на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462708490#map=19/55.62134/37.60619&layers=N ?? really?)))
barigela (2019-03-20 11:05:14+00:00): Hi Adhitya Dido,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across the way 423186264, way 423186330, way 423186284 and way 423186259 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified' and for way 462708742 and way 467849476 classified as 'unclassified', this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:11:17+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:10:31+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:09:51+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:09:03+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:08:24+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:07:51+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
mueschel (2016-12-31 14:26:58+00:00): Hi,
this relation and several others have many tags that look like they don't belong to OSM. Could you check that?

ACRES 	14489.62
EASE_OPEN 	Open
EASE_STATU 	Open to All Use
OBJECTID 	8844
PROP_NAME 	NAVARINO WILDLIFE AREA
RE_INFO_UR 	http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/lands/WildlifeAreas/navarino.html
SHAPE 	Polygon
SHAPE_AREA 	5.8637399703449E7
SHAPE_LEN 	117688.84857
TRANS_TYPE 	1

Cheers, Jan
Skybunny (2016-12-31 17:41:17+00:00): Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44811227 to use OSM compliant tags in all cases. My apologies.

Best,
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:07:16+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:06:41+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:05:41+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:05:07+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:04:34+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:03:56+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:03:07+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:02:29+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:01:03+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 11:00:19+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:59:35+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:58:49+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
datendelphin (2017-01-01 20:34:05+00:00): Hi. This is not mapped correctly. The house there does not have a name. In case you wanted to map some bank or office, please provide more details so we can map it correctly
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:57:46+00:00): Reverted because of suspicious move
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:56:35+00:00): Reverted
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:55:53+00:00): Reverted
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:10:06+00:00): Please note that this one got moved all the way to Finland. Are you sure that's what you wanted?
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:54:46+00:00): Reverted
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:14:09+00:00): This one got moved all the way to Cartagena, Spain. Are you sure about that?
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:54:00+00:00): I have reverted this
Hjart (2016-12-30 10:12:08+00:00): This doesn't appear quite right
Владимир К (2016-12-30 09:17:00+00:00): Кажется, таким ключом никто не пользуется. на вики такого описания нет. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surveillance
в базе всего 7 значений.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surveillance#values
наверняка никто не поддерживает эти ключи. для камер скорости есть http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
Велькин Виктор (2016-12-30 09:56:46+00:00): Этот ключ я не сам придумал, его система выдаёт в списке, я всего лишь выбрал его из списка.
Велькин Виктор (2016-12-30 10:01:18+00:00): Да и тем более, это не дорога, а камера. Так как он отмечен сейчас, он не отображается совсем.
Велькин Виктор (2016-12-30 10:05:37+00:00): Если этот тег не используется, для чего редактор его предлагает выбрать? И как правильно отмечать на карте камеру фиксации скоростного режима?
Владимир К (2016-12-30 10:11:28+00:00): В iD какая дурацкая система подстановки, он предлагает видимо автоматически из всего, что есть в базе. Как и написал выше highway=speed_camera.  Там еще можно направление действия камеры указать отношением, в вики вроде про это написано. Highway в осм не значит что это исключительно дорога. Это просто класс объектов, относящихся к дорогам. Там например еще уличные фонари освещения есть. Так что читайте вики документацию, смотрите тэгинфо, тогда не ошибетесь.
Велькин Виктор (2016-12-30 12:26:07+00:00): Понял, значит буду отмечать так.
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
user_6110846 (2017-11-10 22:17:05+00:00): Краснодонська міська рада быть Сорокине не может . В Украине переименование населенного пункта н е обозначает что сразу переименуется горсовет или сельсовет .Бывают долгие периоды . Здесь населенный пункт переимеован а горсовет нет . Поетому альт нейм Сорокине здесь не логично как и Краснодон . В такой ситуации то да не то лучше воздержатся от альт нейм
utack (2017-01-06 01:05:20+00:00): Hi,

are the toll values on the D8 correct?
It is quite confusing which parts are yes and which parts are no, especially near the german border, where one direction is no and one yes.

Maybe you know?
Thanks
kavol (2017-01-06 08:24:48+00:00): The parts around the border are correct (including difference in directions), there are some other problems that are being sorted out, thanks for heads up.
utack (2017-01-06 11:19:24+00:00): I asked on the mailing list, and someone checked the toll values on the entire D8  
They should be correct now :)