piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:39:04+00:00): Hello uplander.
Why did you change this node's tag and location?
Previous tag is more accurate to this business' function and previous location is more accurate to the storefront.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140446
BC4FUN (2022-06-11 19:40:28+00:00): I changed it to help match existing tags in the area.  I appologize if you believe it is innacurate.  Looks like it has been reverted.  Thank You!
SomeoneElse (2022-06-09 13:42:35+00:00): Hello MxxCon,

Calling things vandalism when they are not helps absolutely no-one.
If there is a problem with a particular edit please point it out, but calling edits by mappers that you don't like "vandalism" without any other information is counterproductive.

There have been problematic edits by some editors adding things primarily for "Upland", but unfortunately your comments have made dealing with these considerably more complicated.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123689650 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
user_5359 (2022-06-09 07:08:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed you add only the information, that the building looks like a church. If there is a church add also amenity=place_of_worship, religion, denomintation (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:13:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123689272 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iran
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:14:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123689301 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iran
user_2066394 (2022-06-09 20:19:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679976757
Die nördlich angrenzenden Gebäude wurden abgerissen?
user_2066394 (2022-06-09 20:20:42+00:00): PS: Das andere Norden.
Hans Loderer (2022-06-10 04:28:10+00:00): Hallo Wurzelast,

 

nein es handelte sich lediglich um einen Zwischenstand, hatte gestern morgen keine Zeit mehr. Es handelt sich um ein Doppelhaus mit 2 Hausnummern. Hab das vorhandene Haus erst mal entsprechend verkleinert. Heute hab ich die 2. Doppelhaushälfte ergänzt. Das gilt übrigens auch für weitere Häuser in der Bergstraße.
Gruß Hans
SauravGautam (2022-09-26 07:38:22+00:00): Hi, @Sunil Bhattarai is this road really? Way to Methland?
iandees (2022-06-09 04:17:30+00:00): Thanks for making these changes. Please try to save more often so that your edits are easier to review and understand.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122142143
hatul (2022-09-22 19:19:01+00:00): תודה על התוספת למפה. השבילים מסומנים בשטח?
tdctdctdc (2022-09-28 06:54:00+00:00): מסומנים בהחלט
hatul (2022-09-28 07:30:50+00:00): מצוין, אם כך צריך להוסיף להם יחס מתאים.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Trail_Relations
אני אוסיף אותו.
tdctdctdc (2022-09-28 07:47:05+00:00): אולי אני מפספס משהו, אבל לא הוספתי כבר יחס לשבילים האלו?
hatul (2022-09-28 07:51:41+00:00): נכון, אבל ליחס צריך תגית osmc:symbol שמציגה את הסימון של השביל.
ElliottPlack (2022-06-09 18:03:52+00:00): As we're discussing on Slack, Towson was given the city category because of its population in the 2010 census and it being the county seat
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-10 18:25:23+00:00): Yes - back to city now, and Dundalk is city now too
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 03:07:10+00:00): Hello! Pourrais tu veiller a ne pas mettre les noms en capitales pour tes prochaines éditions? Par exemple ici on aurait Pizza NY Cela fait partie des bonnes pratiques OSM.. Merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122143713
vezzo (2022-06-09 09:28:42+00:00): The shape of this building is now wrong.
The map is made to have correct data and not to be pretty to look at. If your software does not render this building correctly the correction should be done software side and not data side.
Thank you
vezzo (2022-06-09 11:53:49+00:00): Sorry, I see the kind of modification you made.

The problem in this form was not corrected by your changset, but it still remained. In the lower left corner there was still a segment coming out of the building (two overlapping lines). The two extrusions are not the problem that needed to be corrected.

It took a while but I finally found the problem. The only thing I don't understand is how come JOSM didn't show me that kind of error that should be reported.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.
vezzo (2022-06-09 11:54:10+00:00): I resolve the problem in other chageset.
BCNorwich (2022-06-10 06:47:52+00:00): Hi, Please be careful not to map sections of highway on top of existing highways. This is duplication and it could disrupt routing. I've just corrected several instances of duplication.

Regards Bernard.
jonorossi (2022-06-10 13:20:52+00:00): Distribution lines should be power=minor_line. power=line is for bulk transmission lines, usually 45+ kV.

Open Infrastructure Map is a great tool to visualise power lines, substations and generators.
Tech Dec (2022-06-14 07:32:33+00:00): Thanks Jon. I've been using Open Infra Map as a guide for where to add more powerlines where there should be some. I've found this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Classification_of_power_lines which will also help a lot. I've retagged the lines as power=minor_line as you suggested in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122357703
user_5359 (2022-06-09 07:04:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
cserpell (2022-06-14 16:22:52+00:00): Hola MND! Gracias por los cambios, cambié algunas cosas menores, en general está bien. Por ejemplo, algunos elementos que se agregaron con la etiqueta building=yes pero que no son un edificio en todo el terreno.

Saludos,
bikingaround244 (2022-06-09 15:51:56+00:00): this is a huge change set please make them smaller
Enock4seth (2022-06-10 22:53:05+00:00): I am afraid this kind of alignment is not the best. Do you want to say that all the GPS traces along this road are very wrong?
KulundaSteppe (2022-06-14 12:25:48+00:00): Hello Enock4seth. I found a few areas that could be further improved using GPS traces and made these adjustments. Thank you, and happy mapping!
user_5359 (2022-06-11 10:39:16+00:00): Hello! You add 43 nodes with the misspelled key hight. But the nodes doesn't have any other tag (like  natural=tree). What is your target for this entries?
Neb the B (2022-06-12 18:22:37+00:00): Yes. I already changed them. It was the kerb. I used the wrong tag.
Thanks for give me notice. :-)
user_5359 (2022-06-12 17:28:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/484308057/history. Please notice the language code is added with a colon (not with a semicolon). But check also the name:vi value.

こんにちは！ https://www.osm.org/way/484308057/historyをご覧ください。 言語コードには（セミコロンではなく）コロンが追加されていることに注意してください。 ただし、namevi の値も確認してください
rarad74 (2022-06-09 09:06:27+00:00): Salut. Nu stiu daca este vandalism. Userul i care a implementat pe osm totul, a muncit foarte mult sa faca asta si cred ca a importat datele ca atare dintr-o sursa oficiala unde nu sunt puse diacritice. E posibil ca ruta sa nu mai functioneze daca pui diacritice. Peste tot el nu a folosit diacritice. Mi-a atras si mie atentia dupa ce am modificat prin Rasnov si Cristian si le-am lasat ca atare. O zi buna.
VLD518 (2022-06-16 10:04:16+00:00): Hello. Indeed, this is not a case of vandalism. The error was incorrectly labeled this way. Please tell us if you have problems finding addresses that contains diacritics. At some point, all landmarks will need to be written with diacritics, for accuracy, so if you come across landmarks that you want to label in the future, please use diacritics. Thanks for the feedback! (Salut. Într-adevăr, nu este vorba despre vandalism. Eroarea a fost etichetată eronat în acest mod. Te rugăm să ne spui dacă ai întâlnit probleme în a găsi adrese care conțin diacritice. La un moment dat, toate reperele vor trebui să fie scrise cu diacritice, pentru corectitudine așa că, dacă pe viitor întâlnești repere pe care vrei să le etichetezi, te rugăm să folosești diacriticele. Mulțumim pentru feedback!)
map per (2022-06-09 18:35:49+00:00): Hallo gevjoe,

wilkommen bei OSM.

Ich hab mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut und hab noch was zu beanstanden:
1) ein Hörsaal ist kein Gebäude, sondern ein Raum (indoor=room)
2) Hörsaal/lecture hall ist nicht der Name des Raums, sondern eher eine Beschreibung. Da bitte z.B. etwas wie "Karl von Linde Hörsaal" als name=* angeben oder die Raumnummer als ref=* eintragen.

Hab beides so weit ich mich auskenne verbessert (Name oder Raumnummer des Hörsaals kenne ich nicht).

Viele Grüße
map per
BCNorwich (2022-06-10 07:09:38+00:00): Please be careful not to duplicate sections of highways. I've just removed several sections that you've recently mapped.

Regards Bernard.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-22 02:18:46+00:00): This changeset broke the city boundary of Anna, TX, are you able to correct it?
confusedbuffalo (2022-06-11 14:07:09+00:00): On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5263739484 any idea if you meant 16:15 or 16:45 for the Monday to Friday collection time?
AntV (2022-06-12 19:09:53+00:00): Just checked my notes and yes I'd mistyped it. It was 16:45 and I've just corrected it. Thanks for flagging the error
user_5359 (2022-06-11 10:58:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
richlv (2022-06-27 19:32:15+00:00): Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)
Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienots "attraction" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8987840335 , pievienots tikai nosaukums "RĒZEKNE".
Kas ar to domāts?
epxmap (2022-06-28 14:36:58+00:00): Līdzīgi kā pie Brīvības pieminekļa ir nolikti priekšā burti RĪGA. Šajā gadījumā - RĒZEKNE. 
Attēls: https://www.facebook.com/rezeknespilseta/photos/pcb.5223204504461629/5223160061132740
richlv (2022-06-28 14:52:49+00:00): Super, liels paldies par atbildi - it kā prasās klāt "artwork", bet tas pats key :)
Skatos bildē, ka lietots "title case" - varbūt "name" vērts nomainīt uz "Rēzekne"?
epxmap (2022-06-28 15:17:00+00:00): Nomainīju. Paldies!
richlv (2022-07-01 20:46:33+00:00): Burvīgi, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Starp citu, papildus oficiālajai epasta listei ir arī OSM Latvijas Signal grupa - varbūt tur ir vēlme pievienoties :)
https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL
LucGommans (2022-06-17 00:33:19+00:00): Hmm, I'm seeing three places in the same forest all called Gemeindewald. That seems duplicate to me, considering this best practice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Has this issue been discussed in the (german) osm community somewhere?

I've also got doubts about adding places allegedly called "at the little street". This is not at all unique for a locality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Am%20Str%C3%A4%C3%9Fchen) and there are also many real streets called as such (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186657234). This will just muddle regular address searches and I wonder if anyone really calls a locality such a name. How do you see this?
LucGommans (2022-06-17 00:38:07+00:00): I just noticed another questionable locality name: Glücksburgweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9805658383). That sounds like a street name to me, and indeed there is a street "Glücksburg" just to the north. Do people really call this field (that you placed the node into), or the greater forest or Camp Astrid area, "Glücksburgweg"?
physi_retired (2022-06-17 02:22:41+00:00): Hi LucGommans,

thank you for your comments. The data I add is from the official ALKIS database, which contains all that names. In German these points are called "Gewanne". To map those as place/locality is described in the German OSM wiki for place/locality.

The names are shown in nearly exactly the same way as they appear in official digital topographical maps from Germany (depending on scale).

The repetition in some cases is due to the large area of that object. It is comparable to a long street which also uses the street name several times, not only once.

And yes, the addition of "Gewanne" has been discussed many time in the German OSM forum.

Best Regards,
physi
tux67 (2022-06-17 09:26:02+00:00): Hi,

 "And yes, the addition of "Gewanne" has been discussed many time in the German OSM forum." 

Indeed, it has been discussed a couple of times with the question of how to map and if to map at all:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75785

Both topics with **no progress in therms of a community accepted approach** due to a lack of participation of the change originator. 

BR
tux67
physi_retired (2022-06-18 17:46:37+00:00): Just 4 points:

1. The ALKIS data is by no means a "questionable datasource". On the contrary, it is the official ("amtliche") datasource for whole Germany since 2015. I would recommend to acquaint yourself with ALKIS. 
2. Many thousands of data points from the ALKIS system (or derived maps from it) have been entered into OSM in the last years, and not by me. This was (and still is) in accordance with the German wiki for place/locality.
3. In the past, I myself tried to "hide" some of these points by changing the tagging to "old_name". Then you very quickly will find a group of people who strongly oppose to hiding these data. And if you add more data instead, you will find another group of people opposing to that. By the way, both are actually quite small groups. So only if you do nothing both groups are happy...
4.
Glücksburgweg is correct, check the ALKIS data yourself (geoportal.nrw)
LucGommans (2022-06-18 20:19:24+00:00): 1 & 4: I don't doubt that ALKIS is official from the government (that doesn't make it correct) or that you managed to use Strg+C correctly (instead, I highly doubt that someone would call the place Glücksburgweg when there is a Weg called Glücksburg at walking distance to the north).

2: okay so others made the same mistake, is that a reason to continue?

3: not all points are historic, I'm sure many of them are also current, but you said yourself (and I agree) that, without local knowledge, it cannot be said which belong in which category.
physi_retired (2022-06-19 00:19:15+00:00): Is it possible that you don't understand what kind of names we are discussing here? 
Those are "Flurnamen" (or "Gewanne"). And the important point is that to each (!) "Flurstück" there is a name. There is not a single point in all of Germany that does not have a name. 
In case of populated areas the "Flurnamen" typically are the street names plus the house number. And in the same way, street names may have evolved over time but are now officially named, this is true for non populated areas. ALKIS sets the official name. In this sense it can not be wrong. (There may be errors as in any big database of course)
physi_retired (2022-06-19 05:05:39+00:00): Just a clarification to what I wrote before: 
I said: To each (!) "Flurstück" there is a name. 
It would be more correct to say: 
Each (!) "Flurstück" is part of a "Lage", which in turn has a name as defined in ALKIS. These "Lagen" may contain for example "Fluren" or "Gewanne".
wireguy (2022-06-10 12:53:03+00:00): Hi suxin, welcome to osm.  Can you check the new way you added?   it doesn't seem like it should be part of the boundary.  maybe it was accidently created?
Hb- (2022-06-09 11:43:25+00:00): Stehen Kosten und Nutzen bei der Neuanlage dieses kurzen Wegestückes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068129893 noch im Verhältnis? Beeinflußt werden Relationen europaweiter Wanderwege. Alle Tags gleichen (wohl unabsichtlich) denen des verbliebenen Stücks Richtung Westen. Der Bauer hätte seine Wiese auch mit einem access=no auf dem kompletten Weg erreicht.
Pathumthani (2022-06-09 12:11:15+00:00): Mir ist rätselhaft, was dieser Kommentar soll. War gestern dort und konnte feststellen, dass ab hier nach Westen wegen Deichbauarbeiten für Fahrzeuge, Radfahrer und Fußgänger gesperrt ist. Es handelt sich nicht um eine Wiese, sondern um eine geteerte Straße. Welchen Bauer Du da ins Spiel bringst, ist Dein Geheimnis.. Umleitung Butjadinger und E9 bis Seefeld habe ich auf der homepage des Wiehengebirgsverbandes hinterlegt!
Hb- (2022-06-09 14:32:22+00:00): Das Änderungen aktuell eingetragen werden ist sehr löblich. 

Anlass meiner Rückfrage war die Zerteilung Teilung des Weges https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27854613 in den verbliebenen Rest und in den neu angelegten Weg w1068129893. Hierfür konnte ich keine Grund erkennen. Vielleicht ist dies unabsichtlich passiert.
Pathumthani (2022-06-09 14:43:36+00:00): Damit das Thema beendet wird, habe ich jetzt das kurze Stück von der K197 bis zum Standort des Verbotsschildes wieder von access befreit. Macht eigentlich keinen Sinn, da man von der K197 schon das Schild sieht und wohl kein normaler Mensch in diese Stichstraße überhaupt reinfahren dürfte. Will jetzt nicht noch untersuchen, ob ich oder ein Vorgänger den Weg unterteilt haben. Jetzt muss es aber genug sein.
wkdgs (2022-06-14 08:23:42+00:00): Auch private Hofeinfahrten können gemappt werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Ddriveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122151596
wkdgs (2023-04-12 14:05:51+00:00): Da hier keine Antwort kam und man die Einfahrten auf den Luftbildern gut erkennen kann, habe ich die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
syntex (2023-01-21 12:10:27+00:00): Błędna zmiana, to jest budynek.
DaveF (2022-06-09 12:37:59+00:00): Hi
I presume there are some bollards?
pyrog (2022-08-14 07:25:10+00:00): Bonjour Charles,

La suppression (par erreur ?) de ces 2 ways à cassé la relation itinéraire https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13527172

C'est visible dans l'historique de l'outil de gestion des "réseaux de carrefours"
https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/13527172/changes?pageSize=NaN&pageIndex=0&impact=true

Cordialement,
Yves
Rainero (2022-06-13 17:25:29+00:00): Hallo blubberbass,

gerade bin ich über dieses Riesenmultipolygon gestolpert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14234465#map=15/48.2782/8.8432  
Es gibt noch genug Monster-Multipolygone aus der OSM-Frühzeit, da muss man keine neuen anlegen. So etwas ist fehleranfällig und schwer wartbar. Hier sind grob 150 km2 mit landuse=farmland deklariert und dann einige Ortschaften ausgestanzt, viele andere landuse und natural-Flächen aber nicht. Es gibt auch jede Menge Wiesen und Streuobstwiesen, die noch gar nicht kartiert sind und nun pauschal zu farmland gemacht wurden.  
Das Kartieren von Landnutzung geht zum großen Teil mit einfachen Polygonen, das bekannte KISS-Prinzip.
MMn ist es hier angebracht, das MP zu revertieren, weil der Aufwand, es in handliche Stücke zu zerlegen, höher ist als das neu zu erfassen und dann mit der tatsächlichen Landnutzung.

Viele Grüße,  
Rainer
PT-53 (2022-06-19 12:06:37+00:00): Hallo blubberbass,
ich habe im OSM-Forum eine Anfrage eingestellt:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=865276#p865276
Du kannst Dich dort mit Deinem OSM-Account einloggen.
Grüße
dominikschwind (2022-06-09 09:14:55+00:00): Hi, you might want to fix the typo - it's Reisezug, not Reizezug
gormur (2022-06-10 11:30:37+00:00): Thanks for doing the correction for me.
itineris (2024-01-02 19:45:19+00:00): Szia!

Megkérdezhetem, miért törölgeted mindenfelé véletlenszerűen a ref:HU:edid-ket?

Üdv:
Ákos
aixbrick (2022-06-10 09:01:55+00:00): Hallo,
gelöscht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122199779. Bauhaus ist hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202318101. Das hätte bereits aufgrund der Adresse auffallen müssen.
Gruß
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-10 13:03:55+00:00): Na podstawie którego źródła dodana została https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068145399 ?
cyganka (2022-06-14 12:08:00+00:00): Geoportal 2 (Orthophotomap i inne dostępne) i Street View
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-15 08:45:59+00:00): Absolutnie nie używaj Google Street View! Podstawowy problem jest taki iż nie robimy tego z przyczyn prawnych
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-15 08:46:46+00:00): Po drugie, na Geoportalu nie ma tam widocznej drogi
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-15 08:48:17+00:00): Na GSV co najwyżej highway=track widać, na pewno nie highway=residential
Mashin (2022-06-10 20:23:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
It's fine to do test edits, just please don't upload them to the live database.
cheers
Mashin
abakus_uploader (2022-06-09 22:31:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mapper175 (2022-06-11 02:52:40+00:00): Thanks for adding this business to the map! However, as documented on the wiki, advertising material is not appropriate for OSM.
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-10 06:32:29+00:00): Laba diena. Štai šitos sodybos adresas buvo teisingai įvestas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368771475 - Šis adresas yra BE gatvės. Taip, ilgainiui tokių Lietuvoje turi nelikti, bet kol kas dar labai daug tokių yra. Atstačiau teisingą žymėjimą.
user_5359 (2022-06-09 10:55:48+00:00): Hallo! Du verwendest die beiden Schlüssel
surface:colour:cycleway
surface:colour:footway 
Es gibt bereits knapp 500 mal cycleway:surface:colour. Diese Reihenfolge erscheint mit von der Reihenfolge (grob bis fein) logischer. Erst Radweg, dann Oberfläche des Radweges und dann die Farbe der Oberfläche.
Könntest Du deine Notation auf
cycleway:surface:colour
footway:surface:colour
umstellen?
Unabhängig von der von Dir bevorzugten Schreibweise würde ich Dich bitten die Schreibweise (siehe http://www.osm.org/way/622780806) vom Fußweg als foodway zu korrigieren (vier Wege insgesamt)
hadhuey (2022-06-11 09:18:18+00:00): Können wir machen. Ich bastel dann gleich mal meine Auswertungen um. 
Foodway ist ein Tippfehler, das war keine Absicht.
user_5359 (2022-06-12 15:44:48+00:00): Anpassung ist erledigt!
PT-53 (2022-09-05 06:47:45+00:00): Hallo Volkmar,
für diesen Parkplatz-Bereich
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761243507/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "Hidden non-operational tagging" angezeigt:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=7.83652&lat=48.00747&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes%2Cnonop_confusion_on_ways%2Cways_without_tags

Grund ist die falsche Merkmal-Kombination
- amenity=bicycle_parking
- construction=yes

Gem. Wiki  sollte dafür 
- construction:amenity= bicycle_parking
verwendet werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction?uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße