piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-01 05:30:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
George Willton dos Santos Pereira (2018-03-01 06:07:08+00:00): Rua Rio Jacimicia 	São José Operário 	Manaus/AM	69085-640


 dados confirmados pelo site dos correios
openamap (2018-03-15 02:10:25+00:00): 石原工業は
sourceが無いですが、情報元は何でしょうか？
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source?uselang=ja
隣の久々知ソウゲ子ども広場はsource=local knowledgeになっているので、折角現地調査されたのでしたら統一した方が良いと考えます
user_5359 (2018-03-01 07:13:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
jc86035 (2018-03-01 09:32:33+00:00): The Admiralty station relations should be merged (the station is contiguous with no fare gates between the sets of platforms, which are linked by escalators and lifts); I'm not sure what the tagging is for the station structure (building=public_transport?) but you should move the station building tags to the station node, and move the node closer to the centre of the station, probably along Rodney Street.
jc86035 (2018-03-01 08:57:50+00:00): Hi, please be careful with making these. There is already a station building mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248971549), and there are two stop position nodes which are stacked one above the other. You may want to edit areas like this in JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de) instead of iD, because the data is relatively dense.
jc86035 (2018-03-01 09:01:23+00:00): oh. You did edit the station building, but you should have transferred the tags over to the station and/or stop area objects (and possibly added a building=yes tag to it).
bluetable (2018-06-02 00:56:42+00:00): Hi there. I don't understand why removing the public_transport=station railway=station station=subway and subway=yes from the station building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248971549) and then creating a new node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5444471176). It seems like there was a nice mapping of the station area but all that fine detail is now lost in favor of a single node. The documentation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations) mention "a node OR a polygon" but it seems like now both are mapped. Should we go back to having just the building as a station and delete that node?
jc86035 (2018-06-02 02:39:02+00:00): @freayd, cantor34 is unlikely to respond to the changeset comments, since they have had three months to do so. I don't know if there is a standardized method of tagging for metro station outlines. building=railway_station (e.g. Sai Ying Pun) currently renders incorrectly in Mapnik by covering all the other buildings, and railway=station (e.g. HKU) appears to set landuse for the entire outline unless building=yes is used. I don't know if it is appropriate to use a building=* tag for a fully underground structure, and it was suggested to me once that the tunnels should only be mapped as highway=footway (e.g. East Tsim Sha Tsui).

For what it's worth, the completely-mapped set of underground stations in Moscow uses the highway=footway model. The MTR has fairly large underground concourses so I don't know if it would be totally appropriate, but I think it would be good to draw the footway and escalator/lift networks in any case, since they definitely exist and can be mapped.
bluetable (2018-06-08 00:11:04+00:00): @jc86035 There is a tagging guideline for Hong Kong MTR station (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E9.90.B5.E8.B7.AF_Railway) which seems to match the general conventions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Building). My understanding of it is the concourse outline should be mapped with both  railway=station and
building=train_station.

I would say it is rather important to avoid having railway=station duplicates as it is the case with many stations in Hong Kong, where both one node and the concourse way use the tag railway=station. As shown in this diagram https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Overview there is only one railway=station object, either a node or an area.

I'm not sure why Sai Ying Pun station renders above the buildings. The tag layer=-3 should prevent that. I don't know what's going on here. But in any case "don't tag for the renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).

I'm not sure if highway=footway would be correct for concourses as it will imply that one can walk anywhere within that area. But these areas includes shops and the entire platform outline but we can't physically walk all around the platform and on the tracks. But I might be wrong. Having all the foot ways (either with as ways or areas), escalators, travelators and lifts would be really nice for sure. But seems like a lot of fairly complex work that could easily be broken by any non-expert mapper. I'll leave that to others and would rather focus on station outlines and entrance for now.
jc86035 (2018-06-08 00:26:50+00:00): The building=train_station issue is https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2504. I think if you were to delete the extra nodes and use JOSM to revert the station areas to what they were before cantor34's edits (and merge the relations at Admiralty station) then you could fix it for now.
bluetable (2018-06-08 00:37:40+00:00): Done. Not sure what you mean by "merge the relations at Admiralty station" though.
jc86035 (2018-06-08 00:42:40+00:00): cantor34 also edited a lot of other stations (I reverted his edit on Fanling station). Admiralty station currently has an "Island Line" relation and a "South Island Line" relation created by him, both part of the same parent relation. One or two of those should be deleted at some point.
bluetable (2018-06-08 00:54:12+00:00): Oh I see. I don't have time to check Admiralty station now.

I'm not sure what that means but cantor34 has a very unusual activity with a huge amount of edits, throughout the world, and in a very short time.
jc86035 (2018-06-08 00:59:50+00:00): He also seems to have duplicated stations in Vancouver and Beijing (and probably elsewhere). Maybe an email should be sent to the mailing list or something?
bluetable (2018-06-08 01:41:36+00:00): Yes, maybe. He seems to have stopped editing for the past 3 months though.
Viajero Perdido (2018-03-06 17:43:13+00:00): Hi.  Something seems wrong with the tagging of Hong Kong Station.  You removed "station=subway".  Perhaps as a result, when you search OSM for "Hong Kong", this station shows up near the top of the list, as a house.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-20 14:02:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88251164
kaltuna (2018-04-01 07:52:09+00:00): Hallo,
sind die Fußwege, die Du in diesem Changeset eingetragen hast, Planungen oder schon konkreter ? Ich bin da eben gerade mit GPS-Laufuhr entlang gelaufen und habe einen in Bau befindlichen Fußweg entdeckt und bin ihn abgelaufen. Ich habe ihn von meinem GPS-Track hier eingetragen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57705995

Dieser Weg sieht nicht nach einem temporären Weg aus, es wurden bereits Laternenmasten entlang aufgestellt. Er führt von der Fußweg-Unterführung der Autobahnabfahrt nord-östlich geradeaus weiter, ist dann geschwungen und mündet Tunnel-los in die Düsseldorfer Straße an der Ecke des Parkplatzes. Woher sind denn deine Informationen ?

Viele Grüße!
geowas (2018-04-02 19:27:22+00:00): Die Wege im Bau habe ich hiernach skizziert:

https://www.eschborn.de/fileadmin/eschborn/Bilder/Presse/PDF/BP_246_Entwurf_2017-08-09-1.pdf
kaltuna (2018-04-03 03:40:14+00:00): Hi, okay danke für die Info. Dann wird "mein" Weg wohl tatsächlich ein temporärer Behelfsweg sein, damit man während der Bauzeit als Fußgänger/Radfahrer zumindest bis an die Düsseldorfer kommt. Ich würde sagen dann lassen wir das mal so wie es jetzt ist. Ich komme immer mal wieder da vorbei und schau nach. Viele Grüße !
TZorn (2018-03-05 16:07:44+00:00): Please do not make personal notes in Openstreetmap. This is a public database.

If you like to contribute please have a look at: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Beginners%27_guide
freebeer (2018-03-01 17:11:27+00:00): Hallo,
OpenStreetMap is a serious project that maps the real world.
Not a playground for you to place fiction and incorrect items.
If you want to test things out. OSM is not the proper place as everything you do appears immediately for the world to see.
mueschel (2018-03-02 19:11:12+00:00): Hi,
all data in OSM is case sensitive - please do not use capital letters for names (like addr:country=KILAK ) or values like "FUNCTIONAL"
Thank you,
Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 15:56:11+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3503127 ?

Sorry for asking only now about that confusing case
abakus_uploader (2018-03-01 23:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
lyctkel (2023-10-08 09:20:12+00:00): Hei tesp,
Ihmettelen, mitä tarkoittaa recycling:data=yes. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89823914)
Voitko auttaa minua?
Terveisiä Alankomaista.
lyctkel
---------------------------
Hi tesp,
I am wondering what is meant by recycling:data=yes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89823914
Can you help me?
Greetings from the Netherlands.
lyctkel
abakus_uploader (2018-03-01 23:31:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
geri-oc (2018-07-27 08:45:51+00:00): Please do not use hw = residential_link. Is not in the WIKI and is not overlooked when routing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=50.06412%2C19.92220%3B50.06402%2C19.92226#map=18/50.06436/19.92043
VA00 (2018-07-27 19:07:18+00:00): You mean this: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565319743 ?

Probably by mistake, I was editing construction area. But I'm unsure if U-turn is legal here.
geri-oc (2018-07-28 07:00:10+00:00): But I'm not sure if U-Turn is legal here.

 => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

hw = residential_link! => hw = residential

Greetings from Saxony by Gerd
alan_gr (2018-04-27 12:20:51+00:00): Hola Daniel,
Uno de los vías "inner" de la relacion se ve un poco extraño, es intencional?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565323983
Un saludo
Alan
dcapillae_old (2018-04-27 20:34:52+00:00): Hola, Alan.

No, no es intencional, se trata de un error por mi parte. No me di cuenta, lo siento. Hace tiempo usé la opción de fusionar áreas contiguas en JOSM, y lo más probable es que se me haya quedado ese resto de fusión sin corregir. Voy a eliminarlo para solucionar el problema.

También simplifiqué algunas áreas de uso de suelo residencial fusionando varias en una sola. Fue una edición muy localizada . En algún momento tendremos que darle un repaso a las vías marcadas con «landuse=residential» que hay en toda Málaga. Siguen estando algo revueltas.

Gracias por avisarme del error. Lo corrijo ahora mismo.

Cordialmente,
Daniel
user_5359 (2018-03-01 14:20:38+00:00): Welcome tom OSM! If this I real a police department, please add amenity=police see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpolice
Matthew Darwin (2018-03-01 13:14:26+00:00): Please don't forget to set name:fr tag for all streets within the City of Ottawa.  I have added it for this road.
corinag_telenav (2018-03-01 13:16:42+00:00): Thank you, I will
wille (2018-03-01 09:50:18+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56783111
Владимир К (2018-03-02 11:38:32+00:00): Добрый день! 
скажите, пожалуйста, что означает эта точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4353976195

и почему на ней женское имя на английском?
otdyhkafa (2018-03-02 12:06:04+00:00): Добрый день! к этой точке не имею отношения, возможно она случайно зацепилась при сохранении пакета, я добавлял другие точки, а эта точка уже была
Владимир К (2018-03-02 12:21:44+00:00): да, действительно, недоглядел. Спасибо!
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-01-13 03:30:06+00:00): Hi HealthGeoLab
Thanks for your contribution to OSM. I came across this area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/565358123 and found some issue but I am not sure as armchair mapper. 
Please come a look this coordinate 20.0070793, 95.4630479 
There’s an intersection between railway and waterway. I do check various satellite imagery, but I'm not sure if there is a bridge or tunnel here. Would you mind to recheck this location. Please feel free to discuss if you have any other suggestion?

Thank you
mueschel (2019-10-25 17:12:02+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "AMOR = 25/05/17"? It's only used on two ways on this parking lot.

Thanks!
luiswoo (2018-03-04 16:02:53+00:00): Заречная улица (Кр. Бумажник, рядом с домом культуры) стала изолятором https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification её нужно поднять до tertiary, т.к. ниже лежащий участок должен соединятся с одноуровневой дорогой или большего уровня для образования связной сети, а не "висеть в воздухе".
us2ivb (2018-03-04 17:22:42+00:00): Понял. Исправил. Спасибо.
eggie (2018-03-01 10:48:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-01 11:04:11+00:00): park_ride=yes lijkt me oke zo .. amenity=park_ride staat al jaren als een proposal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
Stanley Vis (2018-03-01 11:10:52+00:00): oke, ik ga alle P+R-locaties in de Metropoolregio Rotterdam Den Haag taggen met park_ride=yes
MNbrn (2018-03-01 20:53:13+00:00): Почему вы удалили там  отрезок дороги междудвумя проездами? Вы там были? Видели это своими глазами?
Svich (2018-03-02 06:52:26+00:00): Там нет проезда,да был и видел!
DD1GJ (2018-03-02 07:26:17+00:00): Hallo Haigis, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe Deine Änderung zurückgesetzt. da Du wohl versehentlich einen Hydranten von der Roßgasse in das Gebäude Rote Gasse 7 verschoben hattest. Wie bei OSM alles funktioniert, steht z.B. in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn es darum geht, bestimmte Schulwege auf der bereits vorhandenen Hintergrundkarte deutlich hervorzuheben, ist u.U. uMap besser geeignet:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/
eggie (2018-03-01 11:07:14+00:00): Bij de noordelijke vertakking staat een stuk op access=private.  Dat zal dus niet routeren. Klopt dat wel hier?
eggie (2018-03-01 11:10:52+00:00): Wellicht kan hier ook name=P+R op?
abakus_uploader (2018-03-01 23:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Jose Luis Infante (2018-03-01 12:47:41+00:00): Hola,
he redibuixat per ajustar-ho als edificis. També he canviat l'etiqueta building=school per amenity=school, ja que entenc que es tracta de tot el recinte de l'escola. Per això he tret els nivells de l'edifici.
Tinc un dubte. Segur que els edificis que donen al carrer de la Barca són de l'escola? Ho comento ja que l'edifici amb el número 13, que has indicat com el número de la direcció, no està inclòs dins del recinte.
Hernan (2018-03-01 12:22:37+00:00): Hola, cuando un avenida cambia de nombre, el viejo nombre va con old_name. Saludos
Michel Nassib (2018-03-01 10:55:42+00:00): Inclusão de mercado.
user_5359 (2018-03-01 11:08:00+00:00): Welcome tom OSM! If this I real a police department, please add amenity=police see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpolice
freebeer (2018-03-01 14:11:05+00:00): vlt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56782347
;-)
Matthew Darwin (2018-03-01 13:16:35+00:00): Please don't forget to set name:fr tag for all streets within the City of Ottawa. I have added it for this road.
corinag_telenav (2018-03-01 13:42:02+00:00): Thank you,I will add the name:fr tag too when editing
Matthew Darwin (2018-03-01 13:43:35+00:00): Thanks.  There shouldn't be many existing streets within the city that are missing name:fr
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-04 10:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56866872 where the changeset comment is: revert several changesets by ZHANGPALEX. These changesets contain many deletions, no proper reason was given and the deletions don't match with Bing imagery. Please ask your supervisor why you shouldn't just delete things.
Alecs01 (2018-03-02 15:58:27+00:00): Hi, please pay attention, the node you deleted belongs to a number of route relations, I reverted this changeset.
abakus_uploader (2018-03-01 23:31:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dudka (2018-03-03 21:32:23+00:00): поверни будь ласка Домаську сільраду до складу Лозівської міськради
olehz (2018-03-04 13:04:43+00:00): ок. виходить тут https://otg.land.gov.ua/ криві дані
viloan (2018-03-01 12:21:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jakka (2018-03-01 14:01:49+00:00): Uw toegevoegd pad gaat door de cafetaria, dat is een foutje graag herbewerken.
Jakka (2018-03-01 14:06:54+00:00): opening hours niet conform de wiki (foutmelding) Zie http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Bytemark (2019-01-29 17:45:49+00:00): Hi Bogdan,

what are you gonna do with this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548174832 ?
Rémi Gaffet (2018-03-01 12:24:31+00:00): Source : https://actu.fr/hauts-de-france/domart-en-ponthieu_80241/faute-repreneur-pharmacie-domart-ponthieu-va-fermer_15142867.html

http://www.courrier-picard.fr/84700/article/2018-01-18/la-pharmacie-de-domart-en-ponthieu-ferme-les-elus-sinquietent
abakus_uploader (2018-03-01 23:31:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
kempelen (2018-03-02 12:14:34+00:00): Szia!
Ez jó, annyi apró változással, hogy a levlistán épp a napokban került említésre, hogy a betűjeles házszámoknál egységes a 3/a formát használjuk, azaz perjel és kisbetű.
zors1843 (2018-03-02 15:29:46+00:00): reverted - duplicate and untagged ways