piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2016-01-23 17:53:37+00:00): Il nome della chiesa è sicuramente errato. Il nome specifica sempre la dedicazione; per esempio "Chiesa di San Pietro" (senza abbreviazioni).

addr:city si usa solo se per il POI si specifica un indirizzo.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-01-23 17:52:05+00:00): amenity=bar non rappresenta un bar italiano. Per una corretto uso della feature vedere: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dbar

Inoltre, in OpenStreetMap si cerca di evitare le abbreviazioni. Quindi dovrebbe essere estesa la O. di "O. Simonotti"
Andrea Musuruane (2016-01-23 17:57:00+00:00): E' stata disegnata un'area ma non sono state associate delle feature all'area.
robbieonsea (2016-01-23 00:56:01+00:00): Can you describe in what ways these amenities were wrong, such that they needed fixing?
mweper (2016-01-22 20:01:56+00:00): Aqui, los valores de cuisine están mal puestos, ya que no van con el guión bajo ( _ ). Se coloca la palabra sola y en inglés, y si son varios valores, separados con coma (sin _ )

Más info: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:cuisine
mweper (2016-01-22 19:58:22+00:00): xrosarinox, un consejo que te daría es que la página de facebook la coloques con su correspondiente etiqueta contact:facebook=* y no en website=* ya que esa etiqueta se reserva por si tiene web oficial.

Más info: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:contact
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 07:57:16+00:00): siempre quitar el prefijo del tipo de negocio, es redundante.
nico pace (2016-01-29 11:45:15+00:00): Lo siento, no entiendo el comentario.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 13:33:39+00:00): ah, me olvidé el ejemplo... sólo es quitar "restaurant" en el nombre porque en todos las apps quedará "restaurante restaurant besaloh". Únicamente se añade el tipo en calles (calle sucre), parques (plaza 14 de septiembre) y escuelas (unidad educativa gualberto villarroel). por ahora.
luiswoo (2016-01-23 06:53:12+00:00): Ylia7, договорились до такого состояния http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3788824 
Если не нравится, могу начать драконить во это https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/72639
luiswoo (2016-01-23 07:22:58+00:00): Поясню: договорились (osm:ru и osm:uk), что Крым входит в состав России и Украины в виде двух разных отношений, российского и украинского соответственно (что бы избежать войны правок). Которые соответственно, подключаются в роли subarea к территории каждой из стран в отдельности.
Вы сейчас начали войну правок, драконя российское отношение, делая его вторым украинским (причём не правильно).
mweper (2016-01-22 19:54:54+00:00): Hola xrosarinox.

Se acordó que los nombres de las marcas u operadores en estaciones de servicios, bancos, etc. se coloquen con sus respectivas etiquetas (brand u operator) y que el nombre se pone, si y solo si el PDI tiene un nombre específico, individual o identificador (sino no llevan nombre). Por lo que, el nombre que pusiste no iría en name sino en brand.

Más info: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fuel#Names
skorasaurus (2016-01-30 16:02:26+00:00): Hey Bill, 

Thanks for updating this! 

I finally drew a polygon around its boundaries a couple weeks ago but figured the aerial imagery was already outdated since I don't pass by it often and the Clinic's continuous expansion. ;) 

Have a mappy day. :)
luschi (2016-09-02 18:22:36+00:00): Hallo,
in Italien entfällt die erste 0 bei hinzufügen der internationalen Vorwahl nicht.
+49 ist die Vorwahl von Deutschland. Italien hat +39
Das Format habe ich auch angepasst
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41874559
lg
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-14 22:12:30+00:00): danke für den hinweis.
eggie (2019-01-12 11:24:44+00:00): Na 3 jaar weer een edit, maar nog geen welkomstmail zie ik.. bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:58:06+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:58:03+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:58:02+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:58:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
malenki (2016-01-22 22:01:51+00:00): Es wäre sinnvoll, neuen Mappern an ihre Changesets zu schreiben, was daran verbesserungsfähig ist – und sei es nur, damit andere Mapper nicht annehmen, dass solche Changesets nicht einfach kommentarlos rückgängig gemacht wurden.
user_5359 (2016-01-22 22:06:26+00:00): Der neue Mapper hat von mir eine private (und höfliche) Willkommensnachricht mit genauer Beschreibung erhalten.
malenki (2016-01-22 22:20:09+00:00): Das ist schön.
Ich habe eben einen Roman an dessen Changeset geschrieben…
maraf24 (2016-01-22 20:45:26+00:00): Wycofałem z powodu usunięcia węzła miejscowości.
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:58+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:56+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
ma-rt-in (2016-01-23 15:29:19+00:00): Hast du noch mehr infos zu den zwei Node´s, besonders 3960267416?
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
Stereo (2016-01-23 15:35:53+00:00): Hello,

La définition de ville dépend du pays. Contrairement à la France, au Luxembourg, la population ne joue pas de rôle. Les villes Luxembourgeoises sont petites, mais ce sont bel et bien officiellement des villes:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_villes_du_Luxembourg

Est-ce que tu veux re-changer les tags?
Amodef (2016-01-23 15:52:49+00:00): Salut,
Le statut légal de ville n'a, de mon point de vue, guère d'importance.
Lorsque tu crées une carte régionale, avec MapBox par exemple, de gros villages / très petites villes se retrouvent au même niveau hiérarchique que de "vraies" villes comme Luxembourg.
Ca me semble complètement ridicule d'avoir sur une carte Liège, Namur, Luxembourg et... Differdange.
Je pense que s'en tenir aux critères de population permet justement d'uniformiser les pratiques entre pays, et surtout d'objectiver la chose.
Qu'en penses-tu ?
Stereo (2016-01-23 17:37:11+00:00): Oui, ridicule, mais c'est un problème de rendu. Je pense que c'est objectivement une ville si ça en a la définition légale. Certains moteurs de rendu, utilisent le tag population=* pour choisir l'importance d'un place=* - je crois que le rendu osm-fr fait ça par exemple.
Amodef (2016-01-24 21:55:49+00:00): Amha, les noms "hameau", "village", "ville", etc. d'OSM n'ont pas pour vocation d'exprimer une réalité légale, mais simplement de servir de repère hiérarchique.
Sinon, comment distinguer légalement une "ville" d'une "grande ville" ? Un "village" d'un "hameau" ? Le tag d'OSM précise d'ailleurs clairement le nombre d'habitants concernés par chaque terme.

Par exemple, la ville (aspect légal) de Neufchâteau (Luxembourg belge) est déclarée comme "village" (aspect démographique) dans OSM. Ça me paraîtrait donc plus cohérent de suivre la même ligne directrice pour les entités luxembourgeoises.

Cela étant dit, concernant Esch, Differdange et Dudelange, elles sont passées de "grandes villes" à "villes", ce qui reste à priori en accord avec leur statut "légal".
Il n'y a au final que Rumelange qui est concernée, puisqu'elle est passée de "ville" à "village".

Mais savoir que Rumelange a reçut le statut de ville de la part de Guillaume IV en 1907 relève pour moi du fait historique et politique, pas géographique.

Si tu n'es toujours pas convaincu, n'hésite pas à revoir le statut de Rumelange, ça ne m’empêchera pas de dormir ^^.

Bonne soirée !
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:51+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:47+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA (2016-01-23 23:50:48+00:00): Hi, it appears you have imported a bunch of data into OSM. Beyond the discussion of licensing and verification of this data, the nodes don't even have correct OSM tags. Could you provide some more info on where you got this data and why you added it? Have you discussed this import at all? See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:44+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-01-24 18:57:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782152
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-21 17:56:08+00:00): Habe die Wendeverbote an der Einmündung der Kleiststraße in die B 54 entfernt. Da ist definitiv kein Wendeverbot beschildert, also darf man.
zool (2016-01-24 08:44:18+00:00): dear cameronk1998,

In this changeset you've added a highway=proposed leading to nowhere that seems to have no basis in fact. OpenStreetMap is a shared attempt to create an accurate map of the world.

Could you please explain where this data is coming from?

Also, it is good practise to leave meaningful descriptions in the "comment" field of your changes so other mappers can follow along.
Jean Passepartout (2016-09-13 13:28:20+00:00): Hi keeler,  Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.  I noticed you added this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363580576, but it is a duplicate of another way, with a different name.  Could you review and fix this?  Please let me know if you need any help.  Thank you and Happy Mapping!  Jean Passepartout
kesler (2016-09-17 21:58:57+00:00): Hi Jean,
Thanks for your attempts to fix Iran map errors and please excuse me for delayed reply. I fixed my mistake and developed Esfarayen town map more in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42234849 .
 
Please feel free and don't hesitate to tell me every big or even minor mis-mapped area in Iran.

Thaks.
uryevich (2016-01-23 10:13:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Изучите пожалуйста описания тегов. Вы изменили статус пешеходных тропинок и дорог на неправильный. Пешеходных улиц в Лосином острове нет. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
literan (2016-01-23 15:07:43+00:00): Во-во. highway=pedestrian это Арбат, Камергерский переулок и т.п.
literan (2016-01-23 15:08:00+00:00): gtnh1201, сами исправите, или как?
uryevich (2016-01-23 15:26:58+00:00): Я откатил
gtnh1201 (2016-01-23 15:28:06+00:00): Так вроде правка отменена - мне через JOSM загружаются исходные данные. Хотя в качестве дополнительной градации  дорожек можно было бы использовать этот тэг- в wiki для higway=pedestrian указано: "Для нешироких тропинок , которые слишком узки для проезда по ним автомобилей (пешеходные улочки), используйте тег highway=footway". Для более широких дорожек можно было бы использовать higway=pedestrian, и в стандартном рендере появляются различия.
literan (2016-01-23 15:36:10+00:00): Мапить под рендер - типичнейшая ошибка новичков! Запрещено! Указывайте ширину пешеходной дорожки соответствующим тегом.
GerdP (2016-01-25 07:37:16+00:00): Hi there!
What was meant with highway=passing_place
on a way? I guess this was a typo, so I changed it to track. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392861058
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 15:55:54+00:00): Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO?

Could you please join the discussion on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import
maraf24 (2016-01-24 13:28:58+00:00): Drobna sugestia: do przeniesienia adresu z punktu na obrys budynku warto korzystać z funkcji Scalania. Wszystkie tagi same się wówczas przenoszą.
Hjart (2016-01-22 22:52:14+00:00): Desværre den skal forbindes med den store vej, ellers virker navigation ikke.
naoliv (2016-01-23 23:35:29+00:00): Robson, por favor, não apague o que já existe. Apenas corrija quando for necessário.
Hjart (2016-01-22 23:06:02+00:00): Cykelstierne langs Tåstrupvej var i forvejen markeret med en cycleway=lane på selve bilvejen (se vores udmærkede vejledning til den slags her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning)
naoliv (2016-01-23 23:34:41+00:00): Robson, porque você apagou as rodovias que já existiam para depois fazer elas de novo?
Você também alterou a classificação dela.
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 18:15:59+00:00): Several cross streets that are separated by a median on Bulevar General Artigas are connected by Foot Paths. There are no Foot Paths across the median. Please revise the foot paths.
muralito (2016-12-06 18:23:12+00:00): If you mean foot paths like this http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314768741 or this http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314768741 they are maped because pedestrian can cross there. 

¿Is there any other way to model this?
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 18:29:13+00:00): They are able to cross a secondary road without a cross walk or traffic light over a median without a designated foot path?
muralito (2016-12-06 19:00:25+00:00): Yes. Pedestrians are prohibited only if explicity signaled or impeded with fences.

I do not make the traffic rules. And for safety they shouldn't be able to cross, and maybe a barrier protect them, but it is legally allowed and common practice to cross like this. Also is common that pedestrians do not respect traffic lights, and walk by the street very close to the fence, or vandalize the fence to cross anywhere... 

Obviously, if a fence is vandalized you shouldn't draw a footway there, or if you draw because with the broken fence there is a real crossing there, I would tag as "access=no"

In Uruguay and Argentina there are also lots of "pirate" access to motorways or highways, access that are not legal, but anyway used by a lot of people because the are no barriers, then as you have to map the real world (the "pirate" access is there) but, for example,  map in a way that the routing engines understand them and avoid routing through them.
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 19:27:40+00:00): OK
muralito (2016-12-06 20:10:12+00:00): You can see some pedestrian prohibition signals and fences here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/917501068 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/917596214 which prohibits the crossing in one of the two sidewalks.
wille (2016-01-24 01:48:08+00:00): Oi, Robinson!

tudo bem?

Sempre que for colocar códigos de rodovias, utilize o campo ref (não o campo name) e ponha um hífen (BR-050).

Outra observação: não é necessário preencher os campos Estado, Cidade e País (principalmente em rodovias que costumam cortar várias cidades).

Se tiver qualquer dúvida sobre o OSM, estou à disposição.
sctrojan79 (2016-02-03 22:48:10+00:00): Nice work on the Arboretum, some really great details added!  It looks like part of the creek was duplicated (way ids 155848138 and 392873123) though, and I'm not sure which one is the more accurate one.  Would you mind taking another look at it?
Glassman (2016-02-04 00:19:19+00:00): Thanks for spotting that.I can see why JOSM didn't catch it. It looked to JOSM like two streams. 

I have more to add, but need help identifying trees. I haven't gotten back to it yet.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 05:57:06+00:00): Es correcta la edición en cuanto al lago, pero el salar a mi parecer sigue siendo el área que envuelve al lago.

Faltaría unir los ríos del norte al lago y al salar. Además corregir el área del salar y corregir enlaces wikipedia y otros datos públicos.
jptolosa (2016-01-29 06:29:58+00:00): Tienes razón, gracias por notarlo, lo corregiré pronto. Agrandaré un poco el salar hasta obtener más o menos el área señalada en Wikipedia, pero está realmente difícil determinar los bordes precisos.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 08:39:46+00:00): Podemos utilizar otras imágenes aéreas históricas,subiré a un repositorio público la última imagen satelital LandSat8 con el máximo de agua de la última estación de lluvia. 

Para la edición sugiero el editor de escritorio JOSM, es más versátil...
jptolosa (2016-01-29 23:25:48+00:00): Sí, JOSM es genial, hace un tiempo usaba Potlatch 2, pero ahora uso JOSM para casi todo.
Sería bueno disponer de la imagen de LandSat, hay una donde el lago Coipasa cubre la totalidad del salar, luego los límites del salar están determinados por los límites del lago en su máximo.
Mi duda es si todas las islas del salar deben ser añadidas al municipio de Coipasa, las que faltan por dibujar y las tres pequeñas compartidas con Chile, ya que al parecer el salar mismo está excluido de cualquier municipio.
tuxayo (2016-01-23 00:30:31+00:00): + fix routing at the entrances of the park
naoliv (2016-01-24 00:14:06+00:00): Rhauan, não precisa criar regras de "proibido retornar" quando for para a mesma rua. Isso é errado.
Reitstoen (2016-01-25 21:56:20+00:00): Hey!
It seem like you have moved an accurate coastline import to Bing Satellite with offset.
I'm moving it back to the correct location.
naoliv (2016-02-04 01:13:49+00:00): And again you are messing with what you don't understand...
naoliv (2016-02-04 01:15:24+00:00): Before making wrong editions, try to understand the data http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Other_attributes
luschi (2016-02-04 17:24:19+00:00): thx for the note
trial (2017-08-07 20:16:02+00:00): Bonjour, il semble qu'il s'agisse d'une Station SNSM, Cf. https://www.snsm.org/actualite/la-station-snsm-de-saint-martin-reprend-du-service?prehome=off et non du siège de l'association.
À taguer comme les autres :
name=Station SNSM
website=http://snsmsxm.skyrock.com/
operator=SNSM
operator:wikidata=Q584914
short_name=SNSM
 (comme les autres) je suppose.
47NOE (2017-08-08 06:14:22+00:00): Oui, c'est une station SNSM.
Je corrige.
Merci
naoliv (2016-01-23 23:03:01+00:00): Evelton, o que exatamente você está querendo representar em suas edições?
aharvey (2017-09-17 23:11:37+00:00): Hi, you've added the network=Sydney Transport. What does this mean? I've never heard of Sydney Transport as an entity.

"Sydney Trains is the operator of rail services across the metropolitan Sydney area, bounded by Berowra, Emu Plains, Macarthur and Waterfall." [https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sydneytrains]

NSW Trains/NSW TrainLink "NSW Trains manages the operation of NSW TrainLink, providing services between Sydney and the Hunter, Central Coast, Blue Mountains, Southern Highlands and Illawarra and South Coast regions" [https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/nswtrains] so should that be network=NSW TrainLink, operator=NSW Trains
dieterdreist (2016-01-23 09:55:33+00:00): evventualmente non tutto il way ha quel nome? Possibile che una parte si chiami Strada di Santa Maria la Rocca? Non ne sono certo, non conosco la zona, giusto un suggerimento...
andrea*g (2016-01-23 14:36:55+00:00): Capisco che sembri strano ed il dubbio si rafforza consultando lo stradario del Comune di Terni (http://www.comune.tr.it/portaldata/UserFiles/Pagina/urbanistica/Stradario.pdf), secondo il quale la Strada di S.Maria la Rocca termina in Strada di Piedimonte.  Andando sul posto però si trova una situazione diversa: la strada di S.M. la Rocca cambia nome in corrispondenza del bivio ad Y (punto di coordinate 42.5833 N; 12.6390 E). Ciò può essere riscontrato con Street View, che permette di vedere i segnali con i nomi delle strade e di constatare che il ramo di sinistra assume il nome di via delle cinque strade.
Proverò a segnalare l'incongruenza all'Uf. Toponomastica del Comune e aggiornerò la discussione. Spero di non aver sbagliato ad apportare la modifica, ma mi sembrava opportuno che la mappa riportasse la situazione che si trova sul terreno, piuttosto che quella diversa e rinvenibile solo negli atti. Ti sono grato per l'attenzione, della quale ho bisogno anche per la mia inesperienza. Ciao. Andrea
dieterdreist (2016-01-23 14:45:40+00:00): ottima risposta, sono d'accordo con te, che va messo così come si vede nella realtà, ovviamente.
Buon proseguimento!
GerdP (2016-01-24 08:32:40+00:00): Hi there!
You changed a highway=residential
to the unusual 
highway="Via sin nombre"
Was that intended ?
If the really road has no name you can use noname=yes
ofprieto (2016-01-26 12:30:17+00:00): ok
Jonáš Hubáček (2026-02-19 18:11:29+00:00): Can I ask why did you add so many single trees in the map?
oini (2016-02-05 05:38:43+00:00): Hi Suvajit! It would be great if you could please verify whether Purono Bajar Road is correctly mapped or should it be mapped as Netaji Subhash Road. Thanks!
Suvajit (2016-02-05 06:03:57+00:00): Hi Oini,
  I verified with a local contact there.
  You are correct. It is Netaji Subhash Road.
  I make the changes accordingly.
GerdP (2016-01-24 08:41:32+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
highway=footpath
is rarely used. Did you mean path or footway?
Mike15 (2016-01-25 04:04:08+00:00): You are correct, I intended to tag footway. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It has been corrected.
GerdP (2016-01-25 04:14:01+00:00): OK, thanks for the feedback :-)
ianlopez1115 (2016-01-24 14:17:21+00:00): Please do not delete stop position nodes. They are on the map since they approximately mark " the place where a vehicle stops along a public transport route to pick up or drop-off passengers (as distinct from the place where passengers wait for the service)" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position )
vichwinn (2016-01-26 05:49:15+00:00): yes I understand what you mean, if you want it that way then be as is. I just delete it coz in other station dont have stop position nodes like what you said, only from baclaran to vito cruz have that stop positon. I was just being organized so I could see it more clearly if I look in to the map. Maybe you can add those stop point to other station as well.
vichwinn (2016-01-27 06:19:14+00:00): ianlopez1115 Im going to remove those 2 stop position and merge it to their respective station. By doing this I am removing superfluous data to map. By default a railroad station should be a stop position, and even if theres no passenger a train always stop at the station. Compare those 5 stations with 2 stop position from both side to other station from LRT1, MRT and LRT2 without stop position, do the math. I am not messing the map, I am fixing the map.
ianlopez1115 (2016-01-27 09:54:04+00:00): There is a huge difference between railway stations and stop positions.

On one hand, railway stations are places where trains stop and pick up and/or drop off passengers, even if there are no passengers are picked up or dropped off in that station (per your point). On the other hand, stop positions indicate the exact or approximate position within the railway station where a vehicle (in this case, a train) would stop and pick up and/or drop off passengers.

I'm currently in the on-and-off process of adding information on railway stations and other public transport (especially in Metro Manila and Laguna) based on existing tagging schemes (an example of this is from London, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_public_transport_tagging_scheme) and stop positions are part of such tagging schemes (an example of this can be found at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/606162976#map=18/51.53844/0.09976&layers=D).

My point is that stop positions are not superfluous data. I suggest that you undo the deletion of stop positions.
vichwinn (2016-01-28 02:36:27+00:00): No can do. What you have said is true and I dont have to disagree. From the example you gave from london didnt you notice there two railway and they identify which railway has stop position. Similar to ours there is only one railway from the map, cannot identify which is south or north bound to tag those stop position. 
If you are on the process (not off) of adding those information to all our railroad then Im with you bro. If you need my assistance Im willing to offer my free time.
But for now let it be similar to each other. Thailand, malaysia singapore and other countries use simple map description to railroad.
vichwinn (2016-01-28 02:48:49+00:00): BTW Im using OSMAND+ for navigating especially outside the country. There is a feature to turn on transport stop to every railroad and road and it will be highlighted. Thats why I am seeing those 3 stop dots from baclaran to vito cruz station but the other station only 1 dot.