piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cristianbogdan (2015-11-07 13:06:19+00:00): This is not correct, the highway was closed for repairs a few weeks ago. This will probably lead to a court dispute on the quality of execution, so re-opening is highly uncertain in the coming months.
Russ McD (2015-11-08 12:32:57+00:00): OK, no worries ... it was Open in August ... if they have closed it again since, I could not have predicted that.
Feel free to reverse the sections affected by the closure.
Rgds, Russ
rskedgell (2024-05-16 19:05:33+00:00): Are you sure there was a 12t weight limit over Lillie Bridge back in 2015? The current 18t mgw limit seems quite recent.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-25 11:03:55+00:00): I'm not convinced that the geometry "fixes" here are beneficial at all.  The area's a mess (local and non-local mappers have tried to sort out the mess perpetrated by the original mapper).  Making multipolygons out of a mess still leaves a mess, but now one that's more difficult to fix.
5m4u9 (2015-10-16 13:21:24+00:00): Bienvenida/o, gracias por editar y mejorar en SipeSipe.

Algunas cosas que tomar en cuenta:

* en las nombres de las calles, añadir el nombre completo del tipo de calle. ejemplo "Calle La Torre", "Avenida Reducto", etc.

* Utilizar siempre un punto en lugar de un edificio o área para las escuelas y otros elementos

* Si hay dos lugares en una misma construcción separarlas y hacerlas independientes

* Los nombres de los negocios no añadir "Tienda" eso se sobrenetiende

Te invitamos a venir cualquier sábado desde las 10h al HackLab Cochabamba a aprender más de OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710181931
Nakaner (2015-10-26 09:53:05+00:00): Hallo openjeki,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Leider musste ich diesen Changeset teilweise rückgängig machen. Schau dir am besten das grafische Diff an und lies danach das, was ich dir im Folgenden dazu erkläre. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34669307

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Gebäude verschoben, deren Lage schon recht gut war. In Baden-Württemberg dürfen wir Maps4BW vom LGL benutzen. Maps4BW enthält die Gebäudeumringe des Liegenschaftskataster und ist daher deutlich lagegenauer als Bing und Mapbox. Maps4BW ist ein WMS-Dienst, iD kann kein WMS, wenn du in BW Gebäude mappen willst, musst du JOSM benutzen.

Bitte beachte außerdem, dass Luftbilder nie exakt senkrecht aufgenommen werden und man daher Gebäude meist von der Seite sieht. In solchen Fällen zeichnet man das Dach ab, verschiebt das Polygon aber anschließend auf die Position am Boden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Roof_modelling

Außerdem hast du in diesem Änderungssatz ein Stützpunkt eines Bahngleis um ca. 0,4 km verschoben und mit einem anderen Gleis verbunden. Bitte sei beim Editieren vorsichtig. OSM ist kein Spielplatz.

Noch ein Hinweis zum Schluss: Luftbilder sind nie ganz aktuell. Bitte lösch/ändere nicht einfach Dinge, die zum Luftbild nicht passen. Meist hat sich der Mapper etwas dabei gedacht und entweder ein note=* am Objekt hinterlassen ("Alle Tags" in iD aufklappen).

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2015-10-26 09:54:32+00:00): Upps, das "herzlich willkommen" hätte ich erst schreiben sollen, nachdem ich einen Blick auf deine User-Seite geworfen habe.
openjeki (2015-10-26 10:48:22+00:00): Hallo Michael,
danke für die Hinweise. 
Grüße Jens
rskedgell (2025-07-22 11:26:38+00:00): Vandalising OSM by adding fictitious weight restrictions isn't "improving [the] street network for routing".
wambacher (2015-10-16 16:14:21+00:00): what the hell is this?
FTA (2015-10-17 03:20:03+00:00): Reverted in http://www.osm.org/changeset/34686743
JochenOSM (2018-08-18 17:47:25+00:00): Hallo,
warum denn leisure=Geolehrpfad ? Das gibt es sonst nirgendwo...
kräckel (2018-08-23 10:24:22+00:00): Hallo Jochen, 
danke für Deine Frage, wie könnte man es noch Tagen?

Bei https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/leisure#values gibt ganz viele einmalige Einträge.

Einrichtung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:amenity ja aber wie auch bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
/wiki/DE:Key:leisure eigentlich nicht für Relationen.

Es ist eine Einrichtung an der die Freizeit verbracht wird. 
Mir gefällt es als leisure besser, weil die Natur, Geo, Barfuß, Bienen, Pilzweg, uva. einen Freizeit Ansatz haben.

Eine grundsätzliche Regelung und niederschreiben im Wiki Diskussions-Seite könnte Klarheit schaffen.

Weiterhin frohes Mappen und viele Grüße

	Kräckel
kräckel (2018-08-23 10:27:20+00:00): Nachtrag defekter Link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:leisure

Sollten Hinweistafeln Mitglieder einer Relation sein?
JochenOSM (2018-08-23 13:17:44+00:00): Man könnte das leisure= doch einfach weglassen? Erstens ist es keine Einrichtung/Ort sondern ein Weg. Und zweitens gehen ja alle anderen Wanderwege auch durch die Natur und werden in der Freizeit begangen. Die anderen Wander- und Radwege kommen aber ohne leisure= aus. Ich finde das verwirrend. Außerdem ist "Geolehrpfad" nicht englisch, daher wird es kaum jemand verwenden, selbst in DACH nicht. Und in der Folge auch von keinem Client ausgewertet.
rskedgell (2025-07-28 21:52:29+00:00): Vandalising OSM by adding fictitious weight restrictions isn't "improving [the] street network for routing".
GerdP (2015-10-16 13:47:38+00:00): please review:
I've just corrected a wrong tag
for way 119401978
AsgerFrank (2015-10-16 16:59:19+00:00): Min fejl. Sourceangivelsen var ellers HELT rigtig, Vøl-Bovej. Men mens jeg gik og ventede på start_date, har jeg nok troet at kunne huske det udenad, og har så skrevet den forkerte ind  :-(
AsgerFrank (2015-10-16 17:03:55+00:00): For en sikkerheds skyld kørte jeg i eftermiddag ind og kiggede på vejskiltet. Det siger Vøl-Bogade.
AsgerFrank (2015-10-16 17:08:14+00:00): Den ER åbenbart usædvanlig svær for mig ikke at kludre i: I source som jeg først skrev, er det ikke Vøl-Bovej der står, men Vøl-Bogade, der stadig er rigtig.
Hjart (2015-10-16 17:19:48+00:00): Ha :-). Jeg tænkte "Asger plejer da ikke at tage så meget fejl. Nu må jeg lige selv se efter hvad der står på skiltene". Jeg plejer at have rimeligt godt styr på stavning, men diverse svipsere har alligevel lært mig rutinemæssigt at bruge copy-paste :-)
AsgerFrank (2015-10-16 17:25:16+00:00): Ja, tillid er næsten lige så godt som kontrol :-D
literan (2015-10-16 12:59:03+00:00): "Проезд" и "Проезд без названия" это не name. тег name - для имен собственных. Для этого есть тег note. Тег oneway=no НЕ НУЖЕН! любая дорога такова по умолчанию. Удаляю ваши лишние теги.
GerdP (2015-10-23 14:37:47+00:00): please review:
I've changed some typos in the highway tags
highway=tertiarity, highway=Tertiary -> highway=tertiary
I've also changed the direction of the oneway way 25360389.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34821931
Maybe the link roads should also be changed? Please see 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-07-15 08:18:52+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/628640?
GerdP (2015-10-17 07:25:20+00:00): please review :
way 80540464 got invalid tag
highway=residential;unclassified

I've changed it to residential and also the 
ways nearby
G4rp (2015-10-17 08:37:37+00:00): Thanks :)
Warin61 (2016-04-11 04:06:41+00:00): Hi, following some discussion on the tagging list .. I have changed the tag sport=shot_put to sport=shot-put .. British English spelling rather than American. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshot-put
wambacher (2015-10-16 16:14:53+00:00): what the hell is this?
FTA (2015-10-17 03:19:52+00:00): Reverted in http://www.osm.org/changeset/34686743
rskedgell (2025-07-21 08:38:34+00:00): I'm getting very tired of removing your fictitious "improvements".
rskedgell (2025-07-21 10:08:24+00:00): Adding unsigned weight limits without a source isn't an "improvement".
M!dgard (2015-10-16 21:07:57+00:00): Ik weet niet waarom je deze dingen verwijdert, ze zien er goed uit. Ik maak deze wijzigingenset ongedaan. Het kan helpen changeset comments te gebruiken om duidelijk te maken wat je bedoelt met een bewerking.
rskedgell (2025-07-22 09:12:16+00:00): Vandalising OSM by adding fictitious weight restrictions isn't "improving [the] street network for routing".
rskedgell (2025-07-08 13:50:04+00:00): Liar.
Hjart (2015-10-16 12:50:18+00:00): Jeg vil mene denne ændring giver god mening. Jeg håber det har den tilsigtede effekt.
rskedgell (2025-07-08 14:14:52+00:00): Vandalising OSM by adding entirely fictitious and legally implausible weight restrictions does not "improve" anything.
rskedgell (2025-07-31 14:00:44+00:00): Vandalising OSM by adding fictitious weight restrictions isn't "improving [the] street network for routing".
Hjart (2015-10-16 12:46:27+00:00): Jeg havde lige anbragt den der fixme her i formiddags med henblik på en rekognosceringstur. Det er en skam når i Potlatch-brugere laver ændringer uden at have øje for hverken historik eller hvem der har lavet de ting i ændrer.
GerdP (2015-10-30 21:44:58+00:00): please review node 1368822899:
it is tagged barrier=bollard, but it
also has several other tags which are
not appropriate for a node. 
I also wonder why this node is part of way
way 11543946. I think it should be on 
way 289917602.
rskedgell (2025-05-29 09:19:02+00:00): How does adding a fictitious weight limit improve anything?
trigpoint (2015-10-16 14:06:41+00:00): What is the source of this change? it looks a very odd place to have a width restriction.
dataOne (2015-10-23 08:32:50+00:00): I am working on behalf of company called ‘PIE Mapping’. They are in the middle of migrating to OSM platform.
For further details please contact Mustafa Khokhar at mustafa@piemapping.com
rskedgell (2024-05-14 06:41:08+00:00): In what way was adding an entirely fictitious weight limit an improvement?
David Crochet (2015-10-16 17:37:41+00:00): L'information est déjà présente : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70887339
vgeorge (2015-11-02 20:15:18+00:00): Seems like POIs were mistakenly moved in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3789025111
dolphinling (2015-10-16 15:32:59+00:00): What does "width=-1" (on the way) mean?
mcccxxv (2015-10-16 19:05:57+00:00): Removed. Thank you for the note. Not sure how this was defined in error.
R0bst3r (2015-11-16 13:58:47+00:00): Hi xtianetki, can you please review node http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375543554. I think something went wrong ...
GerdP (2015-10-16 14:47:26+00:00): please review way 375538904,
it has invalid tag
highway=residential;path
dolphinling (2015-10-16 15:42:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway says that bus_guideway is for when buses run on a specialized track that steers them automatically. On the Bing imagery this looks more like a normal road. Should it be changed to highway=service access=no bus=yes?
Giblet (2015-10-16 18:42:11+00:00): Yes, absolutely. Thanks for catching that!
SomeoneElse (2015-11-22 21:46:17+00:00): Hi, 
If there's a telephone box with no telephone inside perhaps http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/building=telephone_box would work?  I've used that where e.g. the telephone has been replaced with a small library, tourist information or art display.
trigpoint (2015-11-23 18:06:41+00:00): I have done similar where there is a  	defibrillator inside https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264061549
fkv (2016-05-19 22:52:01+00:00): cave:length aufs Gipfelkreuz (Node 1164573742) war sicher keine Absicht?
Linie29 (2016-05-30 10:38:57+00:00): Öha das gehört natürlich nicht dorthin. Wahrscheinlich war gehört die Länge zum Bodenbergloch welche nicht über dieses Attribut verfügt aber ich habe den passenden Höhlenführer derzeit leider nicht bei der Hand.
fkv (2021-11-20 21:32:06+00:00): Aber nicht Länge 672m. Das Bodenbergloch steht mit 8m im Kataster. Die größte Höhle am Bodenberg ist der Westliche Bodenbergschacht mit 216m. Na egal, am Kreuz hab ich die Höhlenlänge mal gelöscht, und das Kreuz selber detto, weil es nicht mehr da ist. (Kein Wunder, waren nur 2 zusammengebundene Äste.)
Vincent de Phily (2015-10-19 08:47:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM :)

Adding this POI is a good start, but if you want it to show up on map renderings, searches, etc, you'll need to say what it *is* in addition to what it is *called*. I don't know the place, but you probably want to add "shop=door" or "shop=hardware" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shop). Other typical useful tags for shops are website and opening hours (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Opening_hours).

Another tweak: it's probably better to add the business park name to the business park object than as an addr:street tag to POIs. Firstly it is more generally-usefull (all POIs within the park now have this bit of addressing), and secondly there's no actual *street* call that, only the area is.

Cheers, and keep mapping :)
jptolosa (2015-10-19 02:38:15+00:00): Hola, me fijé que extendiste la autopista de Copiapó a Caldera más al este de donde acaba realmente la concesión. En Google Street View puedes ver claramente que la concesión acaba en el punto que señalé yo (justo antes de empalmar con el By Pass Copiapó).
Saludos.
naoliv (2016-02-04 17:27:57+00:00): Gustavo, você apagou um nó que já existia para depois inserir novamente a mesma informação.
Por favor, não faça isso. Reaproveite ao máximo o que já existe, apenas corrigindo o que for necessário.
prokyon (2015-10-26 18:09:19+00:00): Hi. In welche Richtungen gilt für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35981806 (sicher) maxspeed=70? (Diese Straße hat drei, teilweise widersprüchliche, maxspeed-Attribute.)
Ad2007 (2015-10-26 20:39:42+00:00): Hi zurück, auf dieser Strasse ist 100 erlaubt. Ist geändert. War vorher nicht von mir.
prokyon (2015-10-31 17:56:00+00:00): Danke.
GerdP (2015-11-03 21:39:54+00:00): please review my changes reg. the mistagged and  misplaced node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1816762566
aceman444 (2015-11-17 11:37:08+00:00): Hi, you have unnecessarily duplicated many roads when creating the bus route 20 in Houghton-le-Spring. Please be more careful next time. I have fixed them now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35373948 . Thanks.
LivingWithDragons (2015-11-19 10:53:46+00:00): Hi Aceman. I know I did a lot of cutting up roads so that the route relation members covered only the right parts. Sorry if I somehow created duplicate objects in the process, thank you for fixing it.

If you spot a similar duplicate object by me in the future, please let me know so I can look at it closely before deletion. This will help me think how it might happen. I will also fix it up.

From Durham,
Gregory/LivingWithDragons
aceman444 (2015-11-19 18:00:44+00:00): Sure, cutting roads is fine, but without making duplicate copies of them. It was only by coincidence (user report) that I found the duplications in Houghton-le-Spring on line 20. So if you did more bus routes in the are, you can check the roads for errors. Thanks.
zimba (2015-10-16 18:20:48+00:00): bitte keine adressen an wegweiser anbringen, nur an haeuser. danke
Jose Riha (2015-10-25 20:07:08+00:00): prosim uzatvarajte budovy (cesta musi zacinat a koncit tym istym uzlom!). dakujem
Polarbear (2018-10-11 06:54:24+00:00): Der TÜV repariert bei euch Fahrzeuge? Oder warum ist die Prüfstelle als car_repair getaggt?
drolbr_mdv (2015-11-11 16:46:35+00:00): In diesem Changeset sind viele Tags gelöscht worden, die die Radwege näher beschreiben, entgegen dem Tagging-Konsens. Warum?
drolbr_mdv (2015-11-11 16:48:49+00:00): Tags zu löschen, nur weil man sie für "unnötig" hält, stört die Arbeit anderer Mapper.
zarl (2015-11-17 14:47:50+00:00): Dieser "Tagging-Konsens" beruht allerdings auf einer kleinen Diskussionsrunde in einer Mailingliste, bei der ich kein richtiges (Konsens...) Ergebnis sehen kann, auch gibt es null Doku dazu im wiki. Ich halte das immer noch für Tagging für einen speziellen Router. Aber vielleicht ist das intern bei mentzdv dokumentiert?
Константин Гам (2019-03-18 22:28:36+00:00): Добавляя контуры моста не стоит ломать пешеходную навигацию
Dmytro O (2015-12-28 17:07:35+00:00): Hi. I've removed your Post Office node as it duplicates same node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2939806443
Durko_freemap (2015-10-18 17:34:30+00:00): Zdravim Peto, toto je bohuzial cele zle, nove ciary prosim tahaj, len ked zakreslujes nieco nove. Ty ked si chcel toto zakreslit spravne mal si vyuzit relacie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route), potom by to vyzeralo cca. takto https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3432784. Co ako otagovat/zakreslit sa mozes poradit tu: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=sk#!forum/osm_sk , tu aj navrhnem, aby tento changeset bol revertnuty (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback).
Seandebasti (2015-10-31 11:34:17+00:00): well done this is a commit
wille (2015-10-16 21:21:36+00:00): oi, Elisama!

Bem vinda ao OSM! A forma mais adequada de traçar construções é usando o botão área e desenhar todo o contorno da casa ou prédio.

Qualquer dúvida sobre o OSM estou à disposição!
SomeoneElse (2015-10-20 11:22:51+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237824765/history#map=17/53.09581/-1.25298 is public footpath, including the loop at the end?  It seems very unlikely.  Presumably it connects to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323904273#map=16/53.0975/-1.2545 and then west from there?
MatthieuMartin (2015-10-21 13:06:17+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, I have just corrected a typo error on the fixme=* tag. It was recorder as "Fixme" with a capital letter. I think that previous contributors listed in the "Way History" could give you an answer to your request.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-21 13:13:48+00:00): Ah - so you haven't actually surveyed it (and I'm sure that the person who extended it won't have either).  Never mind - I'll have to do that myself at some point.
simone (2015-10-17 00:22:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing stuff near here. Much appreciated :)
Hjart (2015-10-19 09:02:51+00:00): Det øger risikoen for uheldige fejl på vejnettet, når man lader highway=* og diverse polygoner dele noder (overlappe) og gør det desuden sværere at finde og reparere disse fejl. Derfor anbefaler jeg at vejnet og landuse etc. holdes separate.
mikini (2015-10-19 09:26:53+00:00): Det er vi sådan set enige om, det er også min generelle politik at separere features hvor de er urelaterede. Specielt også hvor det drejer sig om større områder, som kan være svære at overskue ved senere redigeringer.
Men når de fysiske features er i samme skala og tydeligvis hænger sammen, og formentlig vil blive ved med at gøre det (som f.eks. her med stier der følger kanten af en eng), synes jeg det er en bedre repræsentation af virkeligheden at bruge dele af den eksisterende model, end at tilføje en ny parallel/redundant repræsentation.
pacman541 (2015-10-28 11:40:11+00:00): Не факт, что дорога от Пожарной площади начинается, вполне возможно от границы города (судя по длине)
OrionX (2015-10-29 00:17:45+00:00): Я руководствовался https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Р84_%28автодорога%29
SomeoneElse (2015-10-20 12:31:18+00:00): Oops, something went a bit wrong there - the campsite got added at latitude 0, longitude 0 (off the coast of Africa).  If POI+ lets you, perhaps you could try again - or add an OSM note (and let me know the note number here) so that I can transfer the details of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3789889360/history to it?

It might also be worth letting the people who wrote POI+ that this happened, too.
Warin61 (2016-01-01 06:15:21+00:00): What is the source?
Specifically way 375640928 ... LPI has that area as a state forest ... not a conservation area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
luiswoo (2015-10-17 15:08:00+00:00): И зачем было удалять? Стандартно для place -- полигон и точка. Это проблема мапника, что его глючит.
AsgerFrank (2016-03-20 19:41:32+00:00): Vejarbejdet med midlertidig ændring (ensretning) burde være overstået forlængst, men jeg har ikke mulighed for at tjekke. Har også sat en bemærkning om samme.
GerdP (2015-11-13 18:43:47+00:00): please review:
maxspeed=5 kph is not clear,
do you mean 5 mph or 5 kmh?
Appears on 8 ways in this changeset.
lilianfornea (2015-11-13 21:19:23+00:00): In Metro-1 area speed limit is 5 km/h. In city (Chisinau) 50 km/h
GerdP (2015-11-14 00:19:30+00:00): Okay, so I'll change the typo mph to kmh
tomorrow.