piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DoHoch (2018-05-15 14:40:28+00:00): Hi Silvia,
sorry, my bad. I mixed it up.
Thanks for the feedback.
Kind regards
Dominik
Silva1989 (2018-05-15 14:43:45+00:00): It's no big deal, it just takes more Processing than needed, and thus Your contributions could take more time to take effect.

Happy edits!
Emanuel S.
viloan (2018-05-14 15:12:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
alan_gr (2019-07-17 09:26:23+00:00): Hi, I noticed this route showing up as a strange circular route on a hiking map. It looks like a walking route has got mixed up with an administrative boundary? I am not sure how to fix as I don't know where the walking route should really be.
Hjart (2018-05-14 15:42:13+00:00): Hvilken slags "rute" havde du forestillet dig at dette skulle være?
EneaSuper (2018-05-15 07:13:49+00:00): Lo volevo fare io :c
sabas88 (2018-05-15 07:16:42+00:00): Too late! :P
Prusaker (2018-05-14 18:25:07+00:00): Я конечно извиняюсь, но домановский полигон расположен совсем в другом месте, и уже обозначен. То, что вы обозначили как полигон - это территория бывшей в/ч (вроде склады были или база хранения при союзе), которая к полигону не имела и не имеет никакого отношения. Ныне полностью заброшена и поросла лесом.
maraf24 (2018-05-16 20:56:21+00:00): Nazywamy to wandalizmem.
Jeśil to się ponownie powtórzy, złożę wniosek do Data Working Group o ban dla ciebie.
user_8120638 (2018-05-17 12:36:13+00:00): Jaki wandalizm przecież teren zabudowy wszędzie jest przez OSM usunięty mowa o Więcborku, Nakle n. Not, Sępólnie Kr itd. Zatem albo wszędzie jest on zaznaczony albo wcale ! Chyba, że OSM promuje wybrane gminy i miejscowości, a inne dyskryminuje co czyni na tej mapie !
maraf24 (2018-05-18 08:43:50+00:00): Usuwanie terenu zabudowy tam, gdzie jest tylko zabudowa mieszkaniowa jest wandalizmem.
Usuwanie zabudowy mieszkaniowej tam, gdzie są pola, szkoły, firmy jest doprowadzaniem danych do zgodności z rzeczywistością.
Jeśli tego nie rozróżniasz to OSM nie jest dla Ciebie.
user_8120638 (2018-05-18 11:28:37+00:00): Cały teren graniczny Więcborka jest terenem zabudowy
maraf24 (2018-05-18 15:41:26+00:00): Jezdnie też?
literan (2018-05-14 19:32:04+00:00): don't duplicate the objects, please
user_5359 (2018-05-14 16:53:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582141801/history
I move the node back to the original position.
Alecs01 (2018-05-19 12:45:23+00:00): Already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5113891621
M!dgard (2018-05-15 20:55:21+00:00): playground=structure ("Speeltuig" in iD) is alleen voor "complexe installaties van aan elkaar verbonden elementen zoals platformen, torens, bruggen, waaraan voorts klim-, glij- en/of schommel-apparaten bevestigd kunnen zijn". U heeft er nogal veel daarvan gemapt, volgens mij zijn die niet allen correct. In de iD-presets zitten ook dingen als "wip" (tag playground=seesaw) en "speeltuin-draaimolen" (playground=roundabout). Probeert u deze nog beter te classificeren?

Als u Engels kan, vindt u op de wiki alle informatie over tags en hoe u moet mappen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/. De pagina over speeltuintoestellen vindt u op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground.
eggie (2018-05-29 13:00:13+00:00): Hoi.. Kun je even naar dat nieuwe fietspad kijken. daar heeft een startende maar totaal niet reagerende mapper een highway=path van gemaakt. Er staat nog construction=cycleway op. 
Groet,
eggie
Dit was zijn changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59347017
eggie (2018-05-29 13:00:44+00:00): Wellicht weet BikePC er ook meer van?
A67-A67 (2018-05-29 14:24:23+00:00): Volgens mij stond er een fietspadbord (G11 of G12a), maar dat weet ik niet helemaal zeker.
eggie (2018-05-29 14:59:40+00:00): Zal BikePC even vragen.. want de mapper reageert vooralsnog niet. Bedankt voor het meedenken..
BikePC (2018-05-29 15:50:41+00:00): Het is een fietspad in aanleg en heb de situatie zoals die was in april 2018 gemapt. Het pad was bijna klaar. Twee hekken die dicht waren als er niet gewerkt wordt en aan de kant van het park een heel klein verbindingsstukje dat nog niet klaar was.
Hoe de situatie nu is, weet ik niet en zal er binnenkort gaan kijken. Maar generic path lijkt me zeker onjuist.
eggie (2018-05-29 15:54:46+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.. Zal wel goedkomen. .. dan laat ik het even aan jou over en verander er nu niets aan.
Groet,
Eggie
Rainero (2018-05-15 20:36:17+00:00): Hallo Fridolfing,

über ein Qualitätssicherungstool bin ich auf diesen Änderungssatz gestoßen. 
Das meiste sind nicht ausgeschriebene Straßennamen. Schreib bitte die Namen immer aus, d.h. z.B. Bahnhofstraße und nicht Bahnhofstr..
Es gibt nur ganz wenige Ausnahmen, z.B. Dr. für Doktor.
Es sind aber auch Einträge an falschen Positionen dabei, die durch die Wheelmap, mit der du editiert hast, bedingt sind. Diese App hat einen Bug, der dazu führt, daß Punkte an falschen Positionen eingetragen werden. 
Das sind mindestens diese beiden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5617850023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5617957424
Die Autowerkstatt ist bestimmt nicht mitten auf dem Bahnsteig.

Da kannst du nichts dafür, ich weiß auch nicht ob der Wheelmap-Bug je repariert wird. Das wird schon seit mehr als einem Jahr erfolglos eingefordert.

Schau dir doch mal den im Browser eingebauten Editor iD an. Einfach auf Bearbeiten klicken und Bearbeiten mit iD auswählen.
Damit kannst du auch Häuser zeichnen. In Fridolfing fehlt da ja noch einiges. Vielleicht hast du Lust dazu?

Servus,
Rainer
wille (2018-05-14 18:36:25+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição, pois você deletou uma estrada que existe e pode ser vista em diversas imagens de satélite.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58957581
user_5359 (2018-05-14 16:47:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your value of service_times isn't readable. If all this information is necessary (and visitable for everyone interested) then try:
service_times = Sa 11:00 
service_times:sabbath_school = Sa 09:30
service_times:prayer_meeting = We 17:00
If you any question or you need help: You are welcome!
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
wille (2018-05-14 18:35:53+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58957862
mueschel (2018-05-20 13:26:24+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this node? Its tag looks strange.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5617878912

Thanks, Jan
SOSM (2018-05-15 12:22:44+00:00): Hi, could you please add comments that actually reflect what you changed? Thanks
grevire (2018-05-17 16:26:29+00:00): Some street name were uppercase. I lowered them
SimonPoole (2018-05-17 17:00:09+00:00): From where did you get the street names in the first place? Please provide proper source tags in the changeset. Indicating what you really have used.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
smaprs (2018-05-14 22:39:28+00:00): Hi, please, it seems the relation of the wetland was broken recently, it's lacking outer segments around Baga, here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5407489#map=12/13.4943/14.3179  
Thus the outer wetland is lost, and the inner parts (island) got rendered at inverse. 
Was this in your changeset? If so, could you fix it (completing outer lines to close the outer polygon)? If not, please tell me, I fix it further.  
(Unfortunatelly it seems there's no other easier way to represent the whole lake as a single entity with all its thousands of islands inside, if not as parts of multipolygons and relation. So sometimes it's broken.)  
Thank you.
fx99 (2018-05-15 04:33:59+00:00): Thank you for the comment. Yes, the outer was broken and I was the last to work on that relation, but I did not cause the problem. Nevertheless, I fixed it and some other problems in that area.
smaprs (2018-05-15 10:33:29+00:00): Thank you much!
Truchin (2018-05-14 18:53:50+00:00): Tu ne respectes pas les règles de base d'OSM. On ne tague pas pour le rendu. Toutes ces informations sont déjà présentes
nlehuby (2018-05-15 10:12:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Ces informations sont déjà présentes dans OSM par ailleurs, il ne faut pas les ajouter sur le nom de l'arrêt.

Si tu veux que ces informations soient affichées dans Maps.me, c'est à Maps.me qu'il faut le demander : https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/1067
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58958439
mathBrian (2018-05-14 16:57:56+00:00): This lets bicycles use the pavement shoulder on the exit ramp. Useful for bicycles.
Pol Dellaiera (2020-05-22 06:49:57+00:00): Bonjour, pourriez-vous m'en dire un peu plus sur ce mémorial ?
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-05-15 04:41:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice

there are no 'residences' on this road, this portion of the road is simply designed to give access to a residential area
Wonderworld (2018-05-16 22:22:38+00:00): Hello Diógenes,

The wiki states that the service tag is for "access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc. This is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys” so it would not be appropriate for this road. This road leads to the residences in Condomínio Talatona Golden. The highway=residential wiki page says "This tag is used for roads accessing or around residential areas but which are not a classified or unclassified highways.”

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Thank you
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-05-17 10:42:31+00:00): I must admit that out of the few definitions that I searched online, I only found one out of them all that aligns with my expectation of what a service road is designed for, I found it on [ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/service_road ] where one of the definitions state, 'A route which enters or circulates through an institution, compound, land area, etc. for purposes of private access, maintenance, or security.', I agree with the portion of the definition you brought up in regards to a 'residential road', however, I think that the definition more accurately describes 'publically' accessible residential areas (an area accessible to anyone) such as neighbourhoods that are connected to major roads, typically there are no obstacles that impeed the passage of individuals and vehicles from one type of road to the other, the residential area in question pertains to a 'walled' community (private property), roads leading into these areas are usually designed for security purposes due to the area being off-limits to people who have no buisness being inside, individuals accessing roads leading in will typically encounter some form of security measure along their way in, that is why I chose to designate them as 'service roads' aside from setting the 'access' key to 'destination', like what you might find leading into a manufactoring plant, a military base or other roads in areas that are designed for the specific purpose of that area, but at the end of the day, this is a minor issue, I simply thought I had designated this portion of the road conforming to the standards of OpenStreetMaps' Wiki
Wonderworld (2018-05-17 21:23:54+00:00): Hi Diógenes, residential roads can have any kind of access, public or private. The separate access=* tag designates if the road is public or not, as you designated with access=destination on way 283602206. Thank you.
bus-mt (2018-05-31 14:11:32+00:00): Hallo derkar,
Du hast den Namen des Buena Vista Fitnessclub in reiner Großschreibung eingetragen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names sagt dazu: "Verwende gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung, mit Großschreibung für den ersten Buchstaben eines Wortes."
Siehe dazu auch die Diskussion im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62452
Trag bitte in Zukunft die Namen mit Groß- und Kleinschreibung ein.
Gruß aus dem Kalletal
Matthias
derkar (2018-05-31 14:46:29+00:00): Oh misst,
da muss ich wohl nochmal die Fußgängerzone in Lemgo prüfen. Da habe ich mindestens 1x auch nur Großbuchstaben verwendet. 
Danke für die Hinweise. 

Hatte dich mal angeschrieben wegen Bahnhöfen. Hast Du da Ahnung?
Danysan95 (2018-05-15 20:48:36+00:00): Ottimo lavoro per la creazione del parcheggio.
Le linee delle corsie del parcheggio però devono condividere un nodo quando si intersecano. Ho già corretto l'intersezione ( nel changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58997709 )
maraf24 (2018-05-16 21:02:00+00:00): Następny wandalizm.
user_8120638 (2018-05-17 12:35:39+00:00): Jaki wandalizm przecież teren zabudowy wszędzie jest przez OSM usunięty mowa o Więcborku, Nakle n. Not, Sępólnie Kr itd. Zatem albo wszędzie jest on zaznaczony albo wcale ! Chyba, że OSM promuje wybrane gminy i miejscowości, a inne dyskryminuje co czyni na tej mapie !
Alecs01 (2018-05-14 19:06:38+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo, sei sicuro che siano ancora strade provinciali? la SP111 soprattutto, qui non la trovo più http://www.provincia.mb.it/Temi/viabilita/stradeprov_html anche come importanza lascerei tertiary, sono strade che collegano due comuni al più, non mi sembrano così importanti
Lorenzo Rasella (2018-05-14 21:18:38+00:00): Ciao Alecs01.
Come importanza sono d'accordo lasciare tertiary, ma per quanto riguarda la SP111, io sono di Lissone, quindi conosco bene quelle strade. E ti posso assicurare che la SP111 esiste, è stata aggiunta di recente, e l'elenco delle provinciali non è ben aggiornato.
Sono comunque disponibile per eventuali chiarimenti!
Lorenzo Rasella (2018-05-14 21:20:07+00:00): Per le altre 2 provinciali, ti posso assicurare che esistono in quei tratti perché sono presenti dei cartelli fisici che denominano le strade
Alecs01 (2018-05-15 18:19:45+00:00): Ok grazie!
wille (2018-05-14 18:30:50+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição: você apagou algumas estradas que existem. Utilize sempre várias imagens de satélite para confirmar se algo existe ou não.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58960397
shaikh solaiman (2019-01-30 04:57:16+00:00): Dear Esmat Enan thanks for your contribution on OSM. Your contribution makes difference but when you make a little mistake it will appear as a great problem. It happens same here. You have drawn 84.5 km long bridge where it is a riverbank. Though at first it was tagged as coastline, then highway and then again it was resolved as riverbank but at the final stage you made it as bridge which might be the longest bridge ever in the world. So please be careful. And try take help from OSM wiki. Thank you.
Lokai (2018-05-15 06:01:22+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,

schön, dass du etwas zum Projekt beitragen möchtest.
Damit rechtwinklige Gebäude auch bei OSM rechtwinklig erscheinen, nutzt bei Editor iD die Taste s um Gebäude auszurichten. Dabei nah genug heranzoomen.
Möchtest du mehr bei OSM kartieren, schau dir den Editor JOSM an, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Vermeide bing als Luftbild, oder richte es korrekt aus.

Viel Spaß
Lokai (2018-05-15 05:58:35+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,

schön, dass du etwas zum Projekt beitragen möchtest.
Damit rechtwinklige Gebäude auch bei OSM rechtwinklig erscheinen, nutzt bei Editor iD die Taste s um Gebäude auszurichten. Dabei nah genug heranzoomen.
Möchtest du mehr bei OSM kartieren, schau dir den Editor JOSM an, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Vermeide bing als Luftbild, oder richte es korrekt aus.

Viel Spaß
Russ McD (2018-10-20 02:49:41+00:00): Way: 556878914 is clearly unpaved but yet this tag was not used.  Fixed now.
RVR002 (2018-10-22 16:57:49+00:00): Hi Russ,

To my eyes, it appears to me that that the road is paved up to around the middle village. Perhaps splitting it there and removing the unpaved tag before that would be more accurate. Let me know what you think.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff
Russ McD (2018-10-23 01:25:54+00:00): You have to be careful in Thailand, as a lot of roads in a grey colour are gravel. Of course we use that specific tag if we have visually surveyed them, but if in any doubt, then it gets unpaved.
Splitting roads where the surface changes is great, as even if you think some of it is paved, then the addition of the unpaved (or dirt) tag to sections that clearly are not,  usually is enough to stop navigation engines using it.
literan (2018-05-14 19:28:36+00:00): полагаю, ваша пивная "Коробка МАИ" на территории школы это неудачная шутка. Удалю. Не стоит так шутить - некрасиво портить данные в волонтерском проекте, данными которого пользуются миллионы людей во всем мире
user_5359 (2018-05-14 20:01:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.

Dear CreditRepair Team! Your SEO specialist does not work very well with OSM. Again and again he tries to attract attention by renaming street names. He only succeeds in doing so on the map at short intervals. This makes my personal annoyance about a company that uses service providers all the longer. In your own interest, I can only recommend that you stop working with me.
Lokai (2018-05-15 05:56:45+00:00): memorial=Gedenkstein?, schau mal hier was davon passt.

Gruß

W
Lokai (2018-05-16 05:48:03+00:00): Danke für die Rückmelduung!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial, die Seite meinte ich. Hast du bestimmt gefunden.
Es sind fast immer englische Ausdrücke, *=Gedenkstein, wäre dann ein von dir erfundener. Wähle den, der am ehesten passt (stone). Ausdruck gehört dann zum Bezeichner description=*
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-08 23:46:00+00:00): you added this road, but in images I cant check that and others you added here, using Maxar layer which is most recent: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588183943/history
fkv (2018-05-31 23:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59445978 where the changeset comment is: revert 58961931
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-06-04 03:26:31+00:00): Hi, RichRico.

Due to warning highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/344080041) crossing the water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/24712991), could you help me to know what the type of road that across the river bank area? do we need to add some additional tag for it?

Thank you. Happy Mapping!
ToniE (2018-05-15 15:54:04+00:00): Hallo Ranger,

willkommen bei OSM.

Ich hätte eine Frage zu Deinen Edits:

"Weg existiert nicht in der Karte

- auf welche Karte beziehst Du Dich hier, bzw. was bedeutet das konkret?

Viele Grüße
Toni
Ranger234 (2018-05-17 00:06:53+00:00): Hallo Toni,

ich beziehe mich auf die OSM-Karte. Konkret meine ich, der von mir eingezeichnete Weg ist in der realen Welt  deutlich als Weg zu erkennen und begehbar. Ich bin ihn persönlich gegangen und habe ihn mit meinem GPS-Gerät aufgezeichnet. In der OSM-Karte existiert er aber nicht. Ich habe ihn eingefügt, damit 
andere diesen Weg auch finden können.

Viele Grüße
Thomas (Ranger)
ToniE (2018-05-17 09:08:58+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

sorry, da war wohl ein Missverständnis auf meiner Seite. Ich dachte, Du hättest in einer anderen Karte gesehn, dass der Weg nicht existiert und hier entspr. geändert. Ich hätte wohl sehen können, dass Du nichts gelöscht, sondern erzeugt hattest.

Viel Grüße
Toni
user_3022894 (2018-05-14 19:35:28+00:00): leisure=park passt einfach besser. Man kann die Landuses (hauptsächlich Wald) ja ggf. hineintragen.
km2bp (2018-05-17 20:48:40+00:00): Nie wiem jak to zrobiłeś bo na zdjęciach satelitarnych tego jeszcze nie ma . ślad GPS też nie został zebrany.  Ale hala jest http://gazetawiecborska.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/31902112_1837051706317298_3052411224084971520_n-e1525606717725.jpg  Tylko prostokątność należy poprawić , bo trapezowata nieco.
maraf24 (2018-05-17 21:36:59+00:00): Jest więcej do zrobienia, bo nowa hala ma mieć 5 tys. m2, a ta wyrysowana ma 8 tys.
trigpoint (2018-05-18 12:26:53+00:00): Hi, this looks a little odd. Tourism=attraction is a very odd way to describe a Training Centre.

Cheers Phil
atcomapper (2018-05-15 04:31:40+00:00): Bemærk at adressepunkter normal ikke skal sættes sammen med bygninger, sådan som du har gjort ved Kattegatcentret, jf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Adresser
atcomapper (2018-05-15 04:36:17+00:00): Please note that address nodes in Denmark should not be merged with buildings like you have done here. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark
!i! (2018-05-15 15:30:49+00:00): Thanks for pointing me to this fact. Indeed at DE we prefer to tag the full buildings / sites to make get best from semantic.

The autoAWS resubmitted the adressnode, so it's ok?
atcomapper (2018-05-15 15:38:00+00:00): Yes I have created the address node again so it is fine now :)
habi (2018-05-14 21:05:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
fuhrenchrigu (2018-05-14 21:21:16+00:00): Hi
anypomp (2018-05-14 20:30:53+00:00): betreft een bospad