piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-08-11 21:54:40+00:00): Hier maar weer eens een beginnetje gemaakt om de bossen weer te verwijderen.
Waarom de wegen uit bossen en grasvelden moeten bestaan heb ik nooit begrepen. Een antwoord heb ik nooit ontvangen.
Mapse
eggie
Gr eggie
Rooie Rinus (2021-08-12 13:48:38+00:00): Ik zag het ook aan de Laan van Copes Cattenburch. Ik kan die vlakken blijkbaar zo verwijderen?
eggie (2021-08-12 14:30:33+00:00): Mapper renz heeft nooit gereageerd. Vlakken horen zowiezo niet vastgeplakt te worden aan wegen op bv een parkeerplaats of pedestrian area na.
Je zou losse bomen kunnen plaatsen op nodes met natural=tree of een bomenrij op een lijnelement met natural=tree_row.
Landuse=  commercial kun je losmaken na selectie met de g toets. Wel checken of er geen wegen plots losraken van elkaar.
De validator zal daar wel voor waarschuwen in zulks geval.
Mapse
Eggie
maraf24 (2021-08-12 08:28:36+00:00): Gdzie tu jest aktualizacja zabudowy?
Jest za to podejrzane podnoszenie kategorii dróg.
pbnoxious (2021-08-11 21:03:00+00:00): Du hast hier die Leerungszeiten des Briefkastens entfernt, laut Webseite der Post müssten die aber richtig gewesen sein, oder?
Daham (2021-08-12 10:13:38+00:00): Die Leerung findet tatsächlich 1x täglich statt. Jedoch nicht zu einer bestimmten Uhrzeit, sondern immer dann, wenn der Briefträger daran vorbeikommt. In der Praxis ist das vielleicht am Vormittag, kann aber auch schon mal 16.30 werden.
Ich gehe mal davon aus, daß die 8:30 auf der Webseite der früheste Zeitpunt sein dürfte.
Wichtig: eine konkrete Uhrzeit steht am Briefkasten selbst NICHT angeschrieben.
pbnoxious (2021-08-12 12:38:18+00:00): Danke für die Klarstellung :)
Daham (2021-08-15 07:48:45+00:00): Hast Du etwas angestoßen?
Jetzt ist am Kasten 8:30 angeschrieben.
Zufall?
pbnoxious (2021-08-16 06:45:05+00:00): Nein, ich habe außer dem Kommentar hier nichts gemacht, ist also wohl ein kurioser Zufall.
DaveF (2021-08-11 21:35:41+00:00): There is absolutely *no* reason for road relations. 
The road's ref on each of its ways provides all the required data
"A431 road" is not its name
smb1001 (2021-08-12 09:42:00+00:00): Well, I disagree with that statement, as does the wiki and the many thousands of existing instances of road relations. In this case it was done as part of the Wikidata tagging project, and unless you're proposing tagging every way (or an arbitrary one of them) with the Wikidata ID then surely the relation serves the same purpose as it does for relations for any other linear feature such as notable footpaths, rivers, or indeed any area relation. The alternative is an Overpass query, beyond the means of most external users, and even then selecting ref=M1 will match three distinct roads in the British Isles alone.

I only added the A431 as I inadvertently selected much of its length when doing the same for the A4, but I suspect you're saying the A4 doesn't merit one either.

As for the name, I've no strong feeling there, but always go with the prevailing existing case and the vast majority of UK road relations have that format as the name. For these things uniformity of tagging is more important, but if a mass edit were agreed then I've no issue with that at all.

But please when commenting do try to adopt a more constructive, less unequivocal tone. Many a less-experienced mapper than myself would well just give up in the face of such a review of their well-meaning edits.
G_P_J (2021-08-13 07:38:31+00:00): Cześć, zduplikowałeś adres Susk Nowy 29 przypisany do tego budynku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807951462. Który budynek w rzeczywistości ma przypisany adres (jest mieszkalny)? Oficjalnie jest to ten budynek bardziej na wschód. Pozdrawiam, Piotr
Mc Oak (2021-08-13 13:07:29+00:00): To jet nowy i stary budynek mieszkalny na tej samej posesji pod nr 19. Jak jest to jedna działka musi byc jeden numer.
Mc Oak (2021-08-13 13:12:16+00:00): Nr 29 nie 19.
G_P_J (2021-08-13 18:45:43+00:00): W Polsce nie numeruje się posesji, tylko budynki. Jeśli powstał nowy budynek, to właściciele mogą wystąpić do gminy o nadanie nowego numeru. Dwa budynki nie powinny mieć tego samego numeru. Zgodnie z ustawą adresacja zawiera: "numery porządkowe budynków mieszkalnych oraz innych budynków przeznaczonych do stałego lub czasowego przebywania ludzi, w tym w szczególności budynków: biurowych, ogólnodostępnych wykorzystywanych na cele kultury i kultury fizycznej, o charakterze edukacyjnym, szpitali i opieki medycznej oraz przeznaczonych do działalności gospodarczej, wybudowanych, w trakcie budowy i prognozowanych do wybudowania,"
riiga (2021-08-11 16:35:20+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108580176 as requested by author (JriSv250). 

Reason: "I accidentally reverted the road to its old alignment because I wasn't using the latest imagery"
emwexx (2021-08-11 16:46:09+00:00): Found the photo. Surface is "sett".
StijnRR (2021-08-14 10:54:34+00:00): Why did you add again oneway:bicycle=no on this road?
hesdrib (2021-08-14 15:02:40+00:00): There was a message on knooppuntnet.nl saying there was a problem.
but the problem was in the network
Sorry
Jeddy (2021-08-11 17:07:36+00:00): Suggestion for proper tags for this amenity? This is the site where sand that mined/extracted from river bed by using dredges is purified, filtered and processed to separate smaller and larger sand.
Jeddy (2021-08-11 17:12:58+00:00): From the OSC image, I can see that the sand is not really processed/filtered there, but is accumulated to be sold to whoever want to buy to build house etc. Any proper that for this amenity?
PaoloLombardi (2021-10-07 16:55:51+00:00): Buondì Jrachi
La modifica sul Percorso 837372662 del Gruppo modifiche 109528565 l'hai fatta lì sul luogo e quindi sei certo che quella strada attraversa quel parcheggio che hai disegnato?
Perché l'ultima volta che ci sono passato le cose non stavano così. Domando per non dover tornare per l'ennesima volta sui monti a correggere in loco le "modifiche" altrui. Grazie.
Jrachi (2021-10-07 18:07:51+00:00): Parli dei due nodi che ho aggiunto?
Li ho messi in base alle ortofoto, dove si vede una strada che passa su un prato con una curva decisa. Anche le immagini più recenti dicono così.
Ma se tu ci sei stato ed hanno costruito un parcheggio, chiedo scusa e tolgo subito quei due nodi.
Mentre che ci sono ti chiedo un'altra cosa. Li vicino hai messo due nodi taggati guidepost uno al punto di contatto di due way (un incrocio) ed un altro sulla way.
Dimmi un pò, tu che ci sei stato di persona, i pali sono piazzati in mezzo al calpestio o sono ad una certa distanza?
Magari sono cartelli messi su un cavo a qualche metro di altezza. Se così ci vorrebbe un tag per indicarlo, forse layer=1?

Simpaticamente.
Ivo, Jrachi
PaoloLombardi (2021-10-07 18:46:45+00:00): Buondì Jrachi
Grazie mille delle info. Spesso parlo a "verifiche effettuate sul campo" ma a sto giro mi pronuncio prima poiché siamo entrati anche nell'argomento "paline".
Quella zona l'ho ridisegnata da cima a fondo l'anno scorso e per fortuna sull'App "Maps.Me" ho ancora la versione NON aggiornata con le tue modifiche quindi quando andrò a vedere di persona potrò fare le comparazioni opportune. Così ti dirò se la foto satellitare è aggiornata ma stante ai fatti ho i miei dubbi.
Per quanto riguarda le paline rimango dell'idea che non è un dramma se OSM permette di mapparle anche come nodo sul tracciato come d'altronde avviene per qualsiasi altra segnaletica verticale. Vedesi i cartelli dello STOP che sono piazzati sui nodi delle highways. Quelli li trovate in mezzo alla strada rischiando di investirli con un qualsiasi veicolo? Quindi penso che hai suggerito una bella idea da aggiungere su OSM ossia il tag "distance" riferito alla segnaletica stradale dal centro della strada. Perché no?
Ora rispondo altro tuo commento.
PaoloLombardi (2021-10-17 17:39:18+00:00): Oggi sono andato nel luogo da te "aggiornato" (?)...50 km andare e 50 km il ritorno solo per quello. Per scoprire che nulla è cambiato da quando andai l'anno scorso sempre di persona a mappare quel colle. E ora puoi vedere come stanno in realtà le cose.
Pertanto INVITO anche te a NON fidarvi delle foto satellitari perché NON SONO AGGIORNATE. Ora però è lecito il dubbio se chi come te, che evidentemente mappa in remoto chissà a quanti km di distanza, ha smanettato su altri dettagli qui in zona affidandosi ad immagini aeree obsolete. Tu capisci che tutto ciò non ha senso? Fidati che è molto peggio che collegare le paline sui tracciati. Saluti!
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 17:45:20+00:00): Beste Cothen,

De source tag is ietwat ouderwets. Tegenwoordig voldoet in principe de "source" (bron) in the vullen bij de changeset wanneer je 'm opslaat, behalve als het een import betreft.
Je kunt invullen "local knowledge", "survey" of bv. "PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest" (deze staat al bij "imagery_used", maar dit komt soms niet overeen met welke je echt gebruikt hebt indien je meerdere lagen gebruikt.)
Je bent verder vrij de tag wel/niet te gebruiken.

Groet,

Daniel
jeslop (2021-08-13 14:32:16+00:00): It's your particular vision, not a camp site. Please don't do this type of edition

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-11 21:14:26+00:00): As per previous changeset comment, private residential yards are not parks. This has been removed and DWG report has been raised.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-11 17:38:03+00:00): Olá não remova tag principal da via, estátua deve ser marcada como ponto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109529140
Moritz Poll (2021-08-11 17:28:30+00:00): Source: Surveys, #marketmapping
MxxCon (2021-08-12 02:53:47+00:00): Once again I'm asking what are you trying to map here? Why do you keep creating new footh path segments on top of already existing ones?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109529259
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:16:59+00:00): I am trying to add the correct walking route between Pioneer and Patsy's. 

At the moment, the walking route from these location takes you up all the way West 74th Street to Central Park West and then across the road to the other side, then all the way down West 74th Street to Patsy's. This is not the shortest walking route.

I was told by Mapbox to change it here or through JOSM. 

I searched on the internet to see how it was to be done. 

This page says change it through a relation.
https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-relations/

You said not to but use a line. Remember, your answer is seen by me through the context of me wanting to correct the walking route between the two points.
MxxCon (2021-08-12 12:28:13+00:00): How are you checking for walking directions? Are you using some app or website?
I just tried here on osm and it routes correctly with both methods..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=40.77843%2C-73.97781%3B40.77871%2C-73.97749#map=19/40.77859/-73.97770

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.77843%2C-73.97781%3B40.77871%2C-73.97749#map=19/40.77859/-73.97769
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:29:14+00:00):  I want to make more changes. There are several incorrect walking routes in this area.

Please point me in the right direction so we can avoid further frustrations.
MxxCon (2021-08-12 12:34:31+00:00): Can you give some examples of incorrect routing? At first glance the state of the map in this area doesn't look that bad, so whatever is wrong should be relatively easy to correct.
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:38:13+00:00): That's excellent new. Yesterday and months prior to this morning, it wasn't showing the right route. I'm not sure why or how it was updated if the edits have been deleted. 

This is my correspondence with Mapbox 

"Hi Erinç,

As an example, I look up the path between Tap NYC on Columbus Avenue in New York and Pioneer Supermarket on Columbus Avenue in New York.

Origin is: C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.7777214050293, longitude: -73.97856903076172)
Destination is:  C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.7784423828125, longitude: -73.97794342041016)

These are the waypoints returned:

C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.77773, longitude: -73.97859), 
C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.778059999999996, longitude: -73.97836), 
C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.7769, longitude: -73.97561999999999), 
C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.77701, longitude: -73.97555), 
C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.77809, longitude: -73.97813), 
C.CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 40.77842, longitude: -73.97788999999999)]


Best,
Szewah"
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:38:54+00:00): Then they directed me to OSM to correct the changes.

So what is the best way to make these changes going forward? Please advise.
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:50:12+00:00): Example of incorrect walking route

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.77768%2C-73.97837%3B40.77971%2C-73.97660#map=18/40.77885/-73.97633
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:52:19+00:00): Another example: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.77768%2C-73.97837%3B40.78003%2C-73.97662#map=17/40.77893/-73.97722
Szewah (2021-08-12 12:53:55+00:00): And here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.77768%2C-73.97837%3B40.77650%2C-73.97924#map=18/40.77732/-73.97882

I'd like to be able to work on correcting these.
MxxCon (2021-08-12 13:21:08+00:00): Ok, I see what the issue is. It's just a matter of missing crosswalk segments that connect to relevant roads.🙂I added a couple of missing ones like on W72, W75 and W76. Once routing software picks up these changes and recalculates things, this area should have better pedestrian navigation. It can be as fast as a few min to a couple of weeks. I have no idea how quickly they process this.🤷‍♂️
At the root of this are 2 different approaches on how to map sidewalks and by extension pedestrian routing. Should sidewalks be mapped as separate paths along the road or should they be mapped as tags/property of existing roads. It is in more detailed explained here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
MxxCon (2021-08-12 13:26:05+00:00): If you are inclined to do it, you are welcome to look over your area and map it whichever method you prefer, be it as separate paths or as property of existing road segments.
Another option, if you have Android phone(not iphone), you can install app called StreetComplete from the playstore. With it you can very easily add more missing detailed information about your area.
Szewah (2021-08-12 13:44:33+00:00): Thanks for helping me. 

It's good to know that I don't have to map out the entire route between two points if one already exists. I can correct it with tweaks. I don't have android so will need to work with the map directly.

As I am still learning, I am sure this won't be the only communications we will be having in the future.

Big thanks for today and in the future.
Szewah
Anton Khorev (2021-08-14 12:13:13+00:00): Hello, Everoo.

You're repeatedly adding "parks" and "meadows" near the house 608 while another user is deleting them. That happens because your additions to the map are not quite correct. Of course you can add details around the house to the map and you managed to add some correctly.

Here' what you could do with the "park" near the house:

- Since it's not actually a park, don't set its type to a park. Draw this area again 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/972333527
and set its type to "grass" (`landuse=grass`, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass )

- Don't invent names for this area. You already tried calling it "Lard Park Yard", "608 Private Access Park", "Sontino Park" etc. which indicates that there's no real name for it. So just leave the name field empty.

Best regards  
Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 19:19:26+00:00): Hey and welcome aziwoqpd,

Looks good. This park is already visible on Maxar -and Esri- (see right sidebar in editor for imagery layers). You can draw it as an area, though it may still be better to wait for it to be finished of course.

Anyhow, Maxar is newer and can be better sometimes in this region. Maxar Premium is currently down, it will be restored at a later time.

Regards,

Daniel
eggie (2021-08-11 21:12:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Je aanvulling lijkt me prima...  De tagging van de voorgaande mapper klopt niet helemaal met cycleway=track binnen een   highway=footway

Ligt hier dan een parallel fietspad naast het wandelpad?
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-11 21:18:00+00:00): Ik zie dat een medemapper geheel correct cycleway=track al heeft verwijderd.
Dat kun je hier zien
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109531767
Dat is een tag uit een ver verleden.

MVG
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-11 19:02:48+00:00): Hey Lars and welcome,

First, I would appreciate a reply. This way we know you are reading your changeset comments.

Feedback...

...regarding the river:
We add names on the way, not the area. Unfortunately, the river way was not continued or supplied with a fixme by the last mapper. You can find it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503402129/history

The river way should be drawn as the centerline of the river.

...regarding Borgestadholmen:
This is already added as a relation and seems to appear correctly in a search
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10489563/history

By connecting the additional area to the coastline, you have also broken the rendering of the island.

...regarding the random nodes:
You seem to have added a node to at least 3 objects by accident.

If so, you should remove these nodes.
(Sidenote: I see there's some issues with this forest overlapping the river, as it is imported data.)



You can always mark a changeset for review when you save it.

However, I think it may be better to revert this changeset if all of the above is true.

Regards,

Daniel
LarsBauger (2021-08-11 20:27:16+00:00): Hi Daniel.
I'm so sorry for the troubles i have created. I went through the tutorial and watched a couple of youtube videos and thought I understood the process. I wanted to map out the river as an area and see now that i should not have  named the area I have removed the name now. I have  continued the river as you suggested above in a different edit, where I think I did it correctly.

Regarding the Borgestadholmen and the other accidental nodes I have added. Is there a way for me to cancel all of them? I'm having difficulties finding the specific nodes.

Again, my apologies. Hopefully I will get better.

Lars
eggie (2021-08-11 21:21:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Wanneer 't Koepeltje de officieel uitgegeven naam is dan is het correct. Is het een naam die alleen door de buurt wordt gebruikt dan loc_name=  gebruiken. 
Up to you... 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-13 21:36:29+00:00): Hallo SteMue,
die von dir gewählten "Namen" der Anschlussstellen auf den Wegen sind in OSM unüblich, sie sind so auch nicht ausgeschildert.
Die Nummer der Ausfahrt steht an der Exit-Node, der Name (ohne "AS") auch, und an den motorway_link kommen alle "destination", die ausgeschildert sind. 
"AS" als Abkürzung wollen wir auch vermeiden.
SteMue (2021-09-16 20:26:54+00:00): Die Anschlussstellen sind exakt mit dem ergänzten Namen auf den Schildern angegeben, sowohl mit der Bezeichnung "AS", als auch mit der Nummer, sowie mit dem vollen Namen.
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-17 09:17:57+00:00): Auch wenn das auf dem Schild steht, in OSM kürzen wir grundsätzlich nicht ab. Abkürzen kann jeder Anwender automatisiert, expandieren nicht. 
Ansonsten brauchen Datenanwender eine gewisse Systematik, damit das Tagging sinnvoll ist, daher gehört der Name der Ausfahrt auf die Exit-Node. Und die Nummer ist eine 'ref' und gar kein Name.
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-17 18:55:41+00:00): Nebenbei hast du die Nodes der Ausfahrt so verschoben, dass sie die Hauptstrecke schneidet.
Ich habe die Probleme korrigiert.
SteMue (2021-09-18 09:54:56+00:00): Danke für die Belehrung von "Euch in OSM".
Diese Art der Sprache ist so typisch für OSM, das man hofft, nur nicht angeschrieben zu werden.
Ekelhaft.
mariotomo (2021-08-11 21:03:55+00:00): wow, this is a large changeset! :-D
purbeckj (2022-01-01 11:39:36+00:00): Spelling mistake: "Smedore" should be "Smedmore", as in the Smedmore Estate (in which it lies) and adjacent Smedmore Hill
fghj753 (2021-08-13 20:50:39+00:00): Tere,
Tekkis küsimus, kas Truumu diagnostika töökoda asub Petrooleumi tänaval või Pärnu maanteel? Hetkel jääb käesolevast muudatusest mulje, nagu oleks ettevõte avanud Petrooleumi tn-l teise esinduse ning Pärnu mnt-l lammutatud majas asuv esindus on endiselt samas kohas avatud, kuid on vahepeal saanud uue aadressi. Kas tegu on veaga ning kas võin duplikaadi eemaldada, või soovid ise proovida olukorda parandada? Juhul kui ettevõte kolis ühest kohast teise, on mõistlik võtta vana (Pärnu mnt-l asuv) variant ja tõsta see Petrooleumi tn-le. Hetkel samas kohas asuva sõlme võib kustutada.
Ette tänades, Fghj753.
Rait Parve (2021-08-14 06:17:45+00:00): Tere,
Kolisime Pärnu mnt 137-st Petrooliumi 8. Kui tüli ei tee siis võid korrigeerida. Ma ei saanud aru, kuidas saab vana variandi tõsta uude selle pärast ongi nüüd topelt.

Rait
fghj753 (2021-08-14 10:58:37+00:00): Objektide liigutamine pika vahemaa taha ongi muudetud võimalikult keeruliseks, sest tihti on juhtunud, et keegi võtab kinni mõnest ristmikust ning tõstab selle kogemata paralleeltänavale. Näiteks saaks Gonsiori tänav teha läbi Kadrioru pargi hüppe Narva maanteele.

Viga parandatud kogumis https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109665545
aceman444 (2022-02-05 19:58:53+00:00): Zdravim, nazov bankomatu nie je nazov jeho banky. Tiez nazvy su zbytocne, nezadavajte ich. Brand a operator staci.
Dodko (2021-08-11 19:38:24+00:00): Značka year_of_construction sa málo používa
Častejšia je start_date
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:start_date
JozoAna (2021-08-11 19:45:03+00:00): Upravené
!i! (2022-11-04 11:57:41+00:00): Why didn't you use the existing node  3060449408 within the building? Do you want to merge both nodes and features?
user_1566574 (2021-08-12 12:10:01+00:00): Il s'agit de éléments différents :
– Un ruisseau : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182002791
– Une délimitation communale : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34433541

Cartographiquement. 🗺️ :)
martinst (2021-08-12 08:19:57+00:00): Bitte flächenmäßig kleinere Changesets erstellen.
Lee Carré (2021-08-12 01:31:24+00:00): Keep the area of a changeset as small as possible. Instead of one large-area changeset, use several smaller ones.

Small areas are much easier to verify.

A large area will cause the changeset to appear in the list of changesets for many mappers checking their local area.

Keep related changes together, but disparate changes in separate changesets.
A67-A67 (2021-08-12 10:08:44+00:00): This changeset changes a library into a spaceport. I've restored the tagging.
Lee Carré (2021-08-12 11:14:41+00:00): Hmm, and the (other|way) was changed from landuse=military to leisure=park.

I had assumed good-faith, and that it was just a newbie's first changeset, but now I'm wondering if this is actually (intentional) vandalism, or carelessly playing around (as is seen on the likes of wikipedia).

Seems that nothing in this changeset is good and it should be reverted.
eggie (2021-08-11 21:31:00+00:00): Dag Henk.. Je hebt op de landuse industrial de tag description=Liemersfietsen gezet. dat lijkt me niet correct.
Op adresnode 63 heb je name=Liemers Fietsen gezet. dat zal niet doen in OSM
Wanneer het een fietsenzaak betreft kun je shop=bicycle taggen.
Wanneer het een groothandel betreft office=company

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-11 21:35:35+00:00): Volgens de website zit de fietsenwinkel ergens anders.. 
https://www.liemersfietsen.nl/
Kun je nog eens kijken.. Ik haal de naam Liemers fietsen van het grote vlak af.
MVG
eggie