piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
user_5359 (2016-07-21 20:22:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  I can’t find the street of your address nearby. And you are NOT a church. 

Therefore I deleted the entry because of too many errors
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
Barangay 164 Zone 14 (2016-07-21 05:22:05+00:00): 10 164 Bayabas St., Talipapa, Caloocan City, NCR ,1400 Philippines, 1400 Caloocan, Philippines
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
user_5359 (2016-07-21 19:55:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node. I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
manoharuss (2016-07-21 07:17:26+00:00): Hi Sujan Nepali,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are appreciated. If all the users strive to map their hometowns, OSM would be a great source of open map data. I have observed that you have given names to the buildings here. I would like to suggest you against it. The names can be the name of the building, name of the apartment complex and by not who lives there. The people who live there change from time to time, so we need to represent the geographical presence of the building instead of people living there. Also, I have changed the ```Way to Roshi river``` to ```track```, as seen from Bing imagery. This road classification guide http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nepal/Roads will help you in understanding the difference between these tags. The roads have to be named from what they are called and not where they lead to. I am sure this is a lot of information to take in. But as you go from feature to feature, you will understand more and more regarding tags on OSM and mapping practices. Hopefully, you find this interesting to continue mapping. If you need help in making your hometown, let me know and I will help you out with it. I am here to help. Please feel free to reply here or drop me a message.

Best,

Manohar
Supaplex (2016-07-21 14:57:28+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
bxl-forever (2020-08-15 11:12:17+00:00): Hello,
I had to revert this.  There has never been a convenience shop named "DVD" here.
user_5359 (2016-07-21 19:37:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
user_5359 (2016-07-21 19:25:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street.
luiswoo (2016-07-21 07:00:35+00:00): ну если "оз. -> озеро", то тогда не "озеро Песчаное", а "Песчаное озеро", что бы совсем до логического конца.
trial (2018-01-21 14:10:37+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi supprimer ces attributs ? Savoir que la place est piétonne ou qu'elle  est une " voie en zone de rencontre" est un plus.
Azhagg (2018-02-05 08:27:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Osmose ( http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/ ) émet une alerte d'incompatibilité entre les tags "highway" ( voie de circulation ) et "place=square" ( place piétonne ). 
Ces places étant bien piétonnes, il m'a semblé juste "d’assainir" les tags et de ne laisser que l'information "place=square".
trial (2018-02-05 18:10:23+00:00): Bonjour, lors de ma remarque, le parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430938493 se trouvait dans une place piétonne, ce qui déplaisait aussi à Osmose. Depuis la Place https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255903784 et la Place en tant que rue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40299902 ont été mis à jour.
Sauf que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40299902 est passé de living_street à residential. Je ne sais ce qui est bon.
Je vois aussi que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255912246 est maintenant un parking.
Almtesh (2016-11-02 12:09:44+00:00): Ajout du bâtiment, à l'arrache à partir de l'imagerie Bing. Si on peut faire mieux, ce serait pas mal, mais c'est déjà assez bien, je trouve.
user_5359 (2016-07-21 19:12:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node. I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
gileri (2016-07-28 20:09:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous retirer les éléments de tracking de l'URL ?

Peu d'utilisateurs OSM les apprécient, et de toute façon vous sûrement catégoriser les utilisateurs venant d'OSM avec les en-têtes HTTP Referrer et User-Agent.
*Martin* (2016-07-21 11:52:55+00:00): "+421 55 72 99 60ž" ?

A do "name" sa dava regonalny nazov (na slovensku slovensky). Anglicky davajte do "name:en".
Kosice region (2016-07-21 12:35:54+00:00): Dakujem je to opravene
Athalis (2016-07-21 08:40:17+00:00): Bing ist auf dem Stand von 2012
Kelerei (2016-08-06 19:03:49+00:00): Hi,

I believe you made an honest mistake with this -- you probably meant to tag the ZU9ECB radio mast, but you renamed the nature reserve instead!  I've reverted the nature reserve tagging back to the way it was before.

By the way, you really should use better changeset comments -- it helps other mappers understand what you've changed and why (I had to guess what your intentions were here).  See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Cheers,
--K
vanagaudi (2019-12-12 23:51:07+00:00): Thanks, had been corrected already.
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:28:47+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
LLlypuk82 (2016-07-21 23:24:05+00:00): что там сейчас?
GosuUndeadGhost (2016-07-22 04:16:33+00:00): На данный момент боксы закрыты. В одной части этого здания (северная) есть лестница. На 1 и 2,этажах двери - похоже, что входы в офисные помещения. Могу прислать фото. Вижу все из окна
LLlypuk82 (2016-07-22 10:26:03+00:00): Фото не надо, раз там ничего конкретного нет. Спасибо.
jeka p (2016-07-21 17:49:32+00:00): Привіт! згадно вікі назва цього озера задорожнє (https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Задорожнє_(озеро)), а меншого коло нього: БАйкал-2
Myazyk (2016-07-21 19:44:11+00:00): Привіт!
"згадно вікі"?
Угу, бачу, що у Вікі таке пише... По ходу, ця назва застраліла, оскільки всі місцеві жителі і в дальшій окрузі іменують це озеро Байкалом.
Сьогодні я телефонував у Тростянецьку сільську об'єднану громаду, на території якої і знаходиться озеро, то там сказали, що воно не має офіційної назви, а називають його Байкалом.
Також додали, що вони якраз зробили генеральний план місцевості навколо озера, тож, може, я його роздобуду колись
kawino85 (2021-11-13 22:52:13+00:00): The buildings are not even straightened ( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=40915853 ). Is this a real upload?
gileri (2016-07-28 20:04:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avez-vous retiré le nom complet de l'hôtel ?

Sur la page web même de l'hôtel le nom est précisé :

http://www.hotel-bb.com/fr/hotels/lyon-centre-monplaisir.htm
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2016-07-29 06:50:37+00:00): Bonjour, il s'agit d'une demande des hôtels b&b qui désirent enlever le nom de la ville dans la nom du commerce. Concernant les éléments de tracking nous les enlevons au fur et à mesure, si vous en voyez qui ne sont pas modifiés n'hésitez pas à les enlever

Cordialement
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-26 09:04:45+00:00): Dzień dobry,
może i 9 lat minęło od dodania, ale dopiero ktoś to zauważył i muszę poinformować, że OpenStreetMap nie jest od umieszczania danych reklamowych o (swoim) obiekcie. Skasowałem część informacji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168129091

Strona internetowa zdaje się od 8 lat nie działać. Zostawiłem telefon. Jak dodaje gdzieś Pani informacje o swojej działalności, radzę samej kontrolować ich poprawność. Dodatkowo - podawanie Google jako źródło informacji jest błędne. A jeśli Pani - lub inna osoba związana z obiektem - dodała te informacje, to nie wiem, po co aż tak kopiować dane.

Pozdrawiam.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-26 09:07:00+00:00): Dodałem też odpowiedni klucz informacyjny, że jest to obiekt do wypoczynku turystycznego: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168129091
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-26 09:07:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168129307
maxerickson (2016-11-21 03:31:31+00:00): \u007f popping up in this changeset.
GodOffLife (2016-07-22 08:53:37+00:00): #Shto? Когда это там появилось???
Andrey Prokopenko (2016-07-22 10:18:35+00:00): https://culttourism.ru/krasnodarsky_kray/krymsk/kurgan_karagodeuashh.html
GodOffLife (2016-07-22 11:35:30+00:00): В реальности то там что-то появилось?
Я, как помню (почти год назад) там повсюду заросли и только.
Andrey Prokopenko (2016-07-22 19:46:51+00:00): Приветствую,  вживую сам ещё не видел, кроме зарослей, в этом и прикол что мало кто знает и  не облагородили еще наверно. 
копать понятно, что не буду, остаётся доп искать инфо в сети.
GodOffLife (2016-07-23 08:59:29+00:00): Ок, проверим.
Спасибо Вам, что начали ставить метки в городе Крымск.
(Здесь никого более нет. Только я, да и Вы быть может)
Если что, то оставляйте заметки, попробую разобрать;)
Gino-52 (2016-07-21 12:36:09+00:00): Hallo  Pierre Pedes,
Du hast gerade den Kreisel in Altenhaßlau aufgesplittet. Damit hast Du alle Relationen, die diesen Kreisel enthalten zerstört. Ich habe die Aufteilung rückgängig gemacht. 
Es ist nicht erforderlich für Relationen den Kreisel aufzuteilen.
Ansonsten hättest Du den Kreisel in kleine Stücke teilen und jeder Relation ihren Teil zuweisen müssen.
Das ist aber wie gesagt nicht nötig.

Weiterhin frohes mappen
Gino
HubMiner (2021-11-14 18:52:17+00:00): FYI, there was a problem with import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2935453
user_5359 (2016-07-21 18:34:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why delete you the hotel relation without any comment? Is the building destroyed?
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:47:44+00:00): Please answer or I will revert your vandalism!
SomeoneElse (2016-08-26 12:50:45+00:00): @user_5359 It's been a month now; do you want to revert it, or would you like me to?
user_5359 (2016-08-26 13:08:21+00:00): Done!
SomeoneElse (2016-08-26 13:08:53+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2016-07-21 18:24:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street.
Reclus (2016-07-21 13:13:50+00:00): Die Änderungen der Haltestelle habe ich rückgängig gemacht, da sie teilweilse völlig falsch waren (covered) und die Daten teilweise an ganz andere Objekte gehörten wo sie auch schon vorhanden waren. Außerdem hast du ein schon korrekt eingetragenes Objekt (Gulli) vernichtet um ein neues Objekt einzutragen.

In Witten ist die Datendichte schon sehr hoch. Daher ist die Gefahr als Anfänger etwas kaputt zu machen sehr hoch. Übe also lieber zuerst woanders.
user_5359 (2016-07-21 18:43:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street.
Reclus (2016-07-21 13:18:39+00:00): Deine Änderungen habe ich rückgängig gemacht, da sie von sehr schlechter Qualität waren. Die Rettungswache ist offensichtlich schon als Gebäude als Weg eingetragen. Man muss sie nicht zusätzlich als Knoten eintragen. Außerdem waren auch Tags falsch.

Woher stammt die Information mit dem angeblich nicht (mehr) vorhandenem AED?

In Witten ist die Datendichte schon sehr hoch. Daher ist die Gefahr als Anfänger etwas kaputt zu machen sehr hoch. Übe also lieber zuerst woanders.

Du solltest Korrekturvorschläge lieber auf der https://www.openstreetmap.org/ als Hinweis/Fehler (sog. Notes) eintragen statt fehlerhafte Edits direkt in der OpenStreetMap-Datenbank zu tätigen.
windjacker (2016-07-21 11:52:55+00:00): Entschuldigt bitte die falsche Beschreibung.
Hier die Richtige:

Korrektur Position Boofe unterhalb der Rauschengrundverschneidung und unterhalb des Rauschengrundkegels. Zugang hinzugefügt.
Begangen und GPS vor Ort am 07.07.2016
Reclus (2016-07-21 13:21:05+00:00): Deine Änderungen habe ich rückgängig gemacht, da sie von sehr schlechter Qualität waren. Die Adress-Tags im Laden Wohnart waren völlig falsch ausgefüllt. Wie man sie wichtig ausfüllt steht z.B. im Wiki. Die Adresse steht aber auch korrekt am Gebäude in dem sich der Laden befindet.

In Witten ist die Datendichte schon sehr hoch. Daher ist die Gefahr als Anfänger etwas kaputt zu machen sehr hoch. Übe also lieber zuerst woanders.

Du solltest Korrekturvorschläge lieber auf der https://www.openstreetmap.org/ als Hinweis/Fehler (sog. Notes) eintragen statt fehlerhafte Edits direkt in der OpenStreetMap-Datenbank zu tätigen.
Reclus (2016-07-21 13:23:34+00:00): Den Laden völlig falsch in eine Wäscherei umzutaggen ist übrigens Vandalismus. Ich möchte dich sehr bitten, mit so etwas aufzuhören.
letihu (2016-08-07 20:00:14+00:00): Wege sollten immer miteinander verbunden werden. 
Z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402981850/history 
mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303917724/history
letihu (2016-08-07 20:13:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432807584/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432807677/history
sind auch betroffen
Dino Michelini (2016-09-15 08:49:05+00:00): Ciao ho notato che hai classificato queste strade come highway=living_street ma in realtà sarebbero semplicemente residential in quanto manca la relativa segnalazione. Se avessi letto la wiki troveresti che in Italia  "Living streets are rarely found in Italy. Use the living_street tag only if this specific sign Italian traffic signs is present." Inoltre ci sono molte imprecisioni sia geometriche che di classificazione anche per altre zone di Manziana e Montevirginio. Ti pregherei di essere più attendo e preciso nel lavoro, viceversa quello che fai è inutile perchè andrebbe corretto se non cancellato e rifatto ex novo.
gnastyle (2016-09-18 19:23:43+00:00): Ciao scusa non avevo letto la wiki.
Comunque ora l'ho sistemato.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-07-22 07:53:37+00:00): Proszę się zapoznać: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
user_5359 (2016-07-21 17:33:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street. If more than one shop in one building, please add for every shop a node.
adrianojbr (2016-07-24 17:41:00+00:00): olá, flávio. tudo bem?

que bom que vc está ajudando a melhorar os mapas nessa região. realmente, sempre é bom ter mapeadores locais que conhecem o que está se mapeando.

todavia, faço algumas sugestões para melhorar essas mudanças que você fez:
1) prefira mapear como área em vez de ponto, pois nesse caso, de fato, a universidade tem uma área. parece que você tenta solucionar um problema de roteamento fazendo essa alteração. mas devemos ter em conta que os mapas do osm são usadas para diversas aplicações, e não devemos privilegiar um programa específico. seguimos as regras, as aplicações que se adaptem. ;)
2) a "Rua (retorno faculdade)" não está ligada às vias próximas. além disso, esse nome é fictício. se vc não sabe o nome da via ou ela não tem nome, deixe o campo "name" em branco. a informação que vc colocou cabe mais na etiqueta "description".
3) a via de serviço da faculdade está com acesso negado (acess=no). é isso mesmo?

abraço.
Maanya (2016-08-04 07:48:19+00:00): Hi Ogmios,
Your efforts in data data to OSM is deeply appreciated. However, could you please let us know why the buildings in this area were deleted.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Maanya
DD1GJ (2016-08-04 10:18:25+00:00): Bing is a histoical aerieal image dated 2012. At Bavaria DOP80 dated 2015 the building is demolished.

@Ogmios: a changeset comment would be helpful
Ogmios (2016-08-04 15:44:37+00:00): Hi Maanya,

sorry, I shoud have given a comment but obviously I forgot this time.

I deleted the building because there is no building.

Regards,

Ogmios
Maanya (2016-08-09 05:15:33+00:00): Hi Ogmios,
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
Regards,
Maanya
marcioaguiar (2016-07-25 14:15:54+00:00): Olá, sputinyk. Observei que você altera áreas muito grandes. Como você decide o que vai alterar?

Estou fazendo esse comentário porque você moveu uma rotatória em Maceió (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344917935) e acabou desalinhando ela. As imagens do Bing em Maceió estão bem desalinhadas, então é sempre bom verificar o alinhamento no Mapbox.

Obrigado.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-07-25 15:27:31+00:00): Opa, tive que criar esta conta mas já parei de usar, então eu movi, mas realmente depois parei de mover as outras. Desculpas.
farmal (2019-07-15 03:56:02+00:00): Hi Bayu Adi Styawan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across these ways

"way 375778688
way 375778685
way 375778684
way 375778687"

where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot :https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-pPfbgupgWcQ/XSv3cvPlu4I/AAAAAAAAAX4/USWnG4EWCd8WvOWESG17k8wSa1LvnSgdACK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-14.png

Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance.
Math1985 (2016-07-23 18:38:36+00:00): Hoi dvdhoven, bedankt voor al je toevoegingen en bijdragen! Wel een kleine opmerking, zou je misschien iets specifiekere comments aan je changeset kunnen toevoegen? Een commentaar als 'wat kleine dingen' is niet echt veelzeggend...
Constable (2016-07-22 08:17:09+00:00): this name doesn't make any sense as the area is already mapped as a beach
jd1121 (2016-07-21 13:42:42+00:00): * Updated
chris66 (2016-07-24 09:06:02+00:00): Was sind das für Daten?
Commodoortje (2016-07-21 20:13:11+00:00): Vermoedelijk heb je per ongeluk deze mutatie gedaan. Volgens mij lag de weg op de juiste manier.
Tevens had je per ongeluk hele haken geproduceerd met overliggende gedeelten, waardoor niet meer routeert.

Inmiddels heb ik je changeset teruggedraaid.
Neem even contact met me op als de situatie echt gewijzigd is.
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-08-13 01:41:03+00:00): Hi paulfuhr,
I deleted the untagged ways (way432371328), please tell me if I'm wrong.
Thank you.
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 06:40:45+00:00): Hi Shannon Gross
I'va changed this road classification to residential
Thank you
Владимир К (2016-08-15 06:30:44+00:00): это не одно и то же кафе три раза?
EinKonstanzer (2016-07-23 13:07:48+00:00): Bitte Poller stehts mit den Wegen verbinden (als Punkt) und so arrangieren, dass es nicht wirkt als ob diese mitten auf der Straße stehen. Sollten noch Wege fehlen dann diese bitte vor Erstellung vom Poller einzeichnen. Folgende Note ist noch offen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/614059
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 06:35:50+00:00): Hi Shannos Gross
I'va changed this road classification to residential
Thank you
Carnildo (2016-07-21 20:26:19+00:00): Please pay attention when dealing with this sort of mis-tagged way.  Yes, it was mis-tagged as a quarry.  But it is also mis-tagged as a mineshaft, a ditch, a peak, and an incorrectly-named road.
ridixcr (2016-07-22 20:39:57+00:00): As I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40909243, I removed only the landuse=quarry because I fixing broken polygons. And in the same way, I've already reverted my edit here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40922008. Thanks for your feedback again.
rskedgell (2024-09-24 09:28:59+00:00): Based on a complete misunderstanding of what the tags mean.
AlexDRL (2016-10-06 08:31:45+00:00): El nodo 992002703 no es a 120? Yo he pasado ahi un monton de veces y nunca me  han multado... en la DGT no pone la velocidad...
JavierGarcia (2016-10-06 12:29:37+00:00): Tienes razón,  pusieron la señalización de 90 unos 300 m antes del radar,cuando lo instalaron pero actualmente ya no esta la señalización de 90. Gracias por avisar.
Kagami (2016-07-22 01:28:24+00:00): Good Job
user_5359 (2016-07-21 17:14:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the zip code.
n4ffd (2016-07-21 17:28:54+00:00): Thanks! '12589' is correct - am I missing something? (my first edit!)
user_5359 (2016-07-21 17:40:05+00:00): I know, these was the first edit: Good job!