piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-08-06 20:03:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
will morris (2019-09-19 14:50:19+00:00): traffic circle no longer exists. is now an intersection with traffic lights.
Firefishy (2019-09-19 15:33:01+00:00): Eek! Aerial imagery + note said otherwise.
Firefishy (2019-09-19 20:52:38+00:00): Hopefully it is now better!
Sorry.
will morris (2019-09-20 15:11:35+00:00): thanks very much!
abrensch (2019-12-01 23:21:58+00:00): Hallo SAQ1973,

wollte gerade die Bahnüberführung der St 2232 entsperren (weil sie nach Presseberichten neu eröffnet wurde), und dabei habe ich gesehen, dass Du hier mit diesem Änderungssatz  sehr grosse Abschnitte der St 2232 als "bicycle=no" getagged hast. Ich finde darauf keine Hinweise, und wäre auch sehr ungewöhnlich, wenn es nicht auch Kraftfahrstrasse ist. Was ist denn da der Hintergrund?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Sowa1980 (2019-08-22 17:28:57+00:00): Недопустимый источник данный, буду настаивать на откате эти данных, и если это не прекратиться на блокировке Вас.
ndm (2019-08-07 09:54:44+00:00): This just looks like an import from rowmaps - you need to revert your changes (or I can) and follow the import guidelines as specified on the OSM wiki.
GrumbleGrumble (2019-08-07 20:27:10+00:00): Hi ndm. Sorry, I'm still getting to grips with OSM! This isn't a direct import. I viewed the South Glos council data by imprting it as a custom layer on iD, and then went over the map individually adding the footpaths to match satellite imagery, street level photos, OS OpenData, and my own knowledge having grown up in the area walking and cycling these paths. In future I'll break things up into smaller edit sets. I'll try and give it all another look over, and flag up any issues.
GrumbleGrumble (2019-08-07 20:27:46+00:00): (I also used old OS maps via NLS and iD)
ndm (2019-08-07 21:36:14+00:00): Assuming all the licencing is fine (!) then maybe any new "paths" need a source=rowmaps and fixme=survey (unless you've walked them).
ndm (2019-08-25 09:11:11+00:00): According to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-August/023358.html it seems that you need to either remove edits or add an attribution notice.
Frans S (2019-08-09 10:40:40+00:00): Hello. I review work of new mappers to check if they comply with the requirements and are free of errors
I enclosed a few pictures which shows from left to right the image, the way you mapped the buildings and the way they should be mapped. 
https://drive.google.com/open?id=10qktnUVEZOM3LR9b6OtDONLlnidOVM1Y
Never include trees in a mapping. Extrapolate the roofline.
Do not include the shadow of a building into your mappings. The dark/black spot beneath a building. It indicates whether an object is above ground level or not. 

Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after  each other (except the round buildings) 

Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse (2019-11-29 22:27:53+00:00): Hello,
A quick question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409574440 - you've added address info to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409574440 , but the previous edit in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69129055 looks a bit odd - "building:levels=Diamonds", "name=Minecraft" and "building=Mine".
Best Regards,
Andy
Leo Slager (2019-08-07 10:39:33+00:00): De changeset is zo groot geworden omdat je de defibrilator hebt vast geplakt aan het fietspad.
Was dat ook je bedoeling ?
TIP: gebruik de linker ALT-toets en iD plakt niet meer.
bxl-forever (2022-02-05 17:20:44+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.
In case you want to re-use your tagging scheme, do know that swimming_pool=outdoor is a deprecated tag.  location=outdoor is just perfect for that.

(Funny to see people calling our aerial imagery "sat view"; this must be a GMaps-thing; in reality, photos of Brussels are taken from planes flying at a low altitude. ;-))
Covid-LockDown (2020-12-18 16:36:15+00:00): Hey buddy,
You and all of your team members will create unnecessary ways(way 711537446),  I have observed in other parts of the country, where ever you see a way/path you people will create it. Please do not create all such kind of unnecessary ways. Please create ways which are navigable and accessible by the public. Please review the ways which are created by all your team members delete those which are not navigable.
MappnMatt (2020-12-18 18:55:10+00:00): Hello Covid-LockDown,
I see that does need changed now. As you can see from the history of this object, I made this edit a year ago. That was based on the available imagery at the time. You can look at the current version of Bing imagery available and see that there was a road there in the older imagery. Maxar has updated this year, showing that now there is no longer a road there. With that information, I have corrected the edit based on the new available imagery. 

Hola Covid-LockDown,
Veo que es necesario cambiarlo ahora. Como puede ver en el historial de este objeto, hice esta edición hace un año. Eso se basó en las imágenes disponibles en ese momento. Puede ver la versión actual de las imágenes de Bing disponibles y ver que había un camino allí en las imágenes más antiguas. Maxar ha actualizado este año, mostrando que ahora ya no hay camino allí. Con esa información, he corregido la edición en función de las nuevas imágenes disponibles.
freebeer (2019-08-11 11:44:07+00:00): one of the above warnings i fixed was for two overlapping nodes, one part of a, one part of b, no additional dupes there, yet it should have been created as an intersection (usually at such a branch i find a co-located iD intersection with an isolated dupe.  mentioning this variant, as i see this is a pre-release iD and i fixed two logic errors with overlapping nodes in a fairly small area.  commented by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73238991
oba510 (2019-08-07 06:45:59+00:00): Instead of deleting the businesses completely, would you mind just removing the tags relevant to the business and leaving the node intact? That way we won't lose the address information, which doesn't change when a store closes.
tbo47 (2019-08-08 22:37:30+00:00): yep. My bad.
map per (2021-05-24 12:00:20+00:00): Hallo manu42,

die Sammlung Münchener Gewässer (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9892151)sollte in OSM eigentlich nicht als Relation eingezeichnet werden (Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien) . Deshalb würde ich die Relation wieder löschen.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2021-05-29 13:29:22+00:00): Bist du mit der Löschung der Relation einverstanden?
user_6471069 (2019-08-17 09:29:24+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś tag building? Teraz budynek aquaparku nie jest widoczny na mapie.
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-07 17:52:47+00:00): Atšaukiau neteisingus dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takų žymėjimo pakeitimus. Daugiau informacijos apie tai, kaip žymima dviračių infrastruktūra:
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
maning (2020-01-30 03:42:05+00:00): The Quezon-Bicol Expressway is a proposed/plan.  Nothig on the ground indicate that it exist, please remove the construction tag in all ways that referenced this relation. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9477824/history
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-01-30 05:09:59+00:00): QBX is already tagged as proposed, and the construction tags you're referring is on a bypass under construction (the Pagbilao Bypass project).
maning (2020-01-30 06:45:28+00:00): I see, I removed the construction tag here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680625784#map=14/13.9721/121.6866
 Is this part of the pagbilao bypass?
user_5359 (2019-08-07 15:59:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the both values, please?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-07 02:42:20+00:00): Hi SillyCuddleBuddy and welcome to OSM :)

I have a question regarding your recent edits - you've created a series of footways named for Holes - what are these? Are they for golf? frisbee? some other kind of sport?
user_5359 (2019-08-07 16:04:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A fire hydrant doesn't have a name. I assume your "name" is more a location description and should  moved to this key.
DaveF (2019-12-31 13:15:05+00:00): Please check for existing shops as polygons before adding nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144114584
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-07 00:54:51+00:00): and by retail, I mean brownfield.
viloan (2019-08-07 01:39:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-07 01:53:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
moila (2019-11-14 16:56:14+00:00): "Hi dudnickiy,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the

way 634780723
way 634780737

classified as 'secondary'. However, when checked with history it was marked to be in construction , and no resources are supporting here so please let us know can we go ahead and mark this in "construction" again.

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
chachafish (2020-03-06 18:46:22+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Below is a link displaying them. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.01950&lat=39.58227&zoom=17&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
DavidJDBA_imports (2020-03-12 15:29:48+00:00): "West Sunset Drive" changed to "Sunset Drive" on houses, now matching street name in OSM and local sign.
chachafish (2020-03-13 22:45:24+00:00): Awesome! Thank you! :)
aharvey (2019-08-07 06:25:56+00:00): I couldn't tell when I last surveyed here, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-33.86438888888889&lng=151.20721388888887&z=17&x=0.5171864733976566&y=0.5816864371843455&zoom=1.0225622820569238&pKey=Q4xyuA7xuGhtElgfYmHlqA if this was a road or not between Bond St and Margaret St, but if you checked recently and didn't look like there was, then all good. Thanks for updating.
NilbogAus (2019-08-07 11:56:37+00:00): Walk past these spots a couple of times a day working around the corner. Pretty sure about these edits :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-25 09:08:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126607484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ndm (2019-08-07 09:55:36+00:00): Do you have a better change set comment - what did you modify?
raito (2019-08-07 07:59:12+00:00): Hi. Perhaps you should use noexit=yes on that last node. Of course the extra note can also go to that same node. Cheers.
raito (2019-08-07 07:59:57+00:00): Here is wiki the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
wslerry (2019-08-07 15:46:05+00:00): Hello, Thanks for notify me.
fmarier (2019-08-07 05:24:10+00:00): There is a sign, but it's been rubbed off fully and is no longer readable at all.
muralito (2019-08-10 17:03:40+00:00): LA PLAZA NO SE PEGA A LA CALLE. LA CALLE ES EL EJE DE LA CALLE. LA PLAZA SE DIBUJA CON EL BORDE MISMO DE LA PLAZA.
Erickson Putrahar (2019-08-07 04:03:57+00:00): This changes looks OK
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
OttawaHiking (2019-08-08 05:17:21+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nobody managed to learn how to walk without falling. Perhaps it's a good idea to start with small steps and save chagesets with a relatively small number of changes so that correct changesets can be distinguished from erroneous. In this changeset, unfortunately, you have broken a wood relation 721456, so that this wood is no longer shown on the map. A wood typically consists of a large outer area with multiple inner areas that are all expected to be closed areas. Because fixing the broken wood does not seem to be trivial, I’m simply going to undo your changeset so that you can give it another try. Please include useful changeset comments that summarize your contribution. All the best!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
aharvey (2019-08-07 06:20:58+00:00): according to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-33.7321&lng=151.006075&z=17&pKey=y3QvmwY3KoO_lyinbUDUfg&x=0.46100263629751287&y=0.4689571364587044&zoom=1.9994186827455607 this is "No Entry, Busses Excepted", "Bus Only" to me that means your changes here (see https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/665997141) are incorrect as cars, bicycles, pedestrians are not allowed on this road.
MapCam (2019-08-08 03:51:15+00:00): Thanks for the mapillary link.  I will update the access tags to remove bicycle and motor_vehicle.  I am leaving pedestrian as both road segments have adjoining footway.
aharvey (2019-08-08 04:58:03+00:00): access=no and then bus=designated, implies no for all other modes of transport. It's not necessary to add motor_vehicle=no. ie. how I originally tagged it.

Taxis are not allowed in "bus_only" acoording to this signage and https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/using-roads/buses/bus-lanes.html

I've added the sidewalk tags to specify which side of the way the footpath runs.
MapCam (2019-08-08 05:01:14+00:00): Apologies, please revert it as you see fit.  I would prefer pedestrian access to remain.  Without it pedestrian access to Castle Hill Station is negatively affected.
aharvey (2019-08-08 05:03:19+00:00): yep I left in foot=yes, but just added the sidewalk tags to be more explicit.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-15 11:21:37+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know, 
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=699819818 has been "source=Google Maps" since version 1 (actually the tag comes from another road that it was split from).  If you're happy that there's basically nothing left of the original Google Maps data I'd suggest removing that tag from it and other similar roads round here (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/QJq is a list).  If you're not, leave it and we'll delete it later.
I've just done a revert of a number of changesets that included Google-sourced data starting at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80608729 , but where other mappers have edited the data since (like this road) I haven't yet done anything.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-15 11:32:11+00:00): http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=37947205 is another example (source=Google Maps from v13).
Adiatma IRM-RV (2020-02-17 03:42:37+00:00): Hello Andy. 

Thank you for let me know. Currently we are not mapping here, but maybe another mappers still. Yeah that's a good idea to wrap up all Google-sourced.

Best Regards,
Dinar
Adiatma IRM-RV (2020-02-17 03:42:42+00:00): Hello Andy. 

Thank you for let me know. Currently we are not mapping here, but maybe another mappers still. Yeah that's a good idea to wrap up all Google-sourced.

Best Regards,
Dinar
chachafish (2019-08-07 13:34:45+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your addition to the map. However, in this edit you changed the name of the Ballpark Lofts to Denver Locksmith. That would not be correct. I have added the business location of Denver Locksmith to the building and renamed the building to Ballpark Lofts. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-07 07:36:33+00:00): Greece: added destination=Λάρισα;added destination:ref=A1;added destination:int_ref=E 75
aharvey (2019-08-07 06:32:59+00:00): Hey Stephen, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link and my understanding of common practice, the highway _link classifications apply to these "physical channelization of turning traffic lanes at traffic signal junctions and in roundabout designs that physically separate a specific turn from the main roundabout.".

I could see at https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73093176 that you've changed some of these to residential, but I suspect _link is more correct.
SomeoneElse (2019-08-07 10:21:04+00:00): Hello sean2019alt and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please use changeset comments that explain what changes you are making?  "dtxgfhj" doesn't mean anything.

Best Regards,
Andy
tux67 (2019-08-07 07:20:09+00:00): Hallo radlergps,
danke für die Updates. Ein kleiner Hinweis: Die access rights foot=yes and bicycle=yes sind obsolet, da das bei highway=path und highway=track der Defaultwert ist.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73093371
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
viloan (2019-08-07 06:05:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
luiswoo (2019-08-07 16:31:53+00:00): Что это за номер «2с2» — это 2 к2 (два корпус\строение два), 2С/2? Или что-то ещё?
Анна Зима (2019-08-08 05:28:25+00:00): это здание на территории пер. Таманский, 2, я понимаю как 2/строение2, если правильно 2к2, то пусть будет так.
luiswoo (2019-08-08 19:57:15+00:00): В Москве видел и 2 с2 и 2 к2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/55.70483/37.59506 Никакой логики, когда используется корпус, а когда строение мне найти не удалось. Теории рознятся. Видимо по-этому в РнД используют дробь "на земле". И я бы использовал 2 к2 — с номером 2/2 на доме всё равно не понятно, и для однообразия. Во всяком случае, корпус\строение пишется отдельно от номера с маленькой буквы (2 к2), а литера (2А) с большой. 2А к2, 2 к2А — вариации на тему.
luiswoo (2019-08-08 20:00:35+00:00): * а литера слитно и с большой буквы (2А)
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Hjart (2019-08-07 07:50:01+00:00): Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing ?