piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2022-05-15 19:53:42+00:00): il progetto a cui si riferisce è diretto da https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/maria_brovelli, ed il nome è già apparso recentemente in Latam per l'altro progetto teachosm 1254.
(sennò, a che serve essere responsibili di un progetto?)
Mashin (2022-05-16 07:26:47+00:00): This changeset should be reverted. It created duplicate lakes in Canada.
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 20:22:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. 
Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
.
Nette bewerking!
Ik heb het nog iets verbetert, tevens iets doorgetrokken, er is namelijk een bruggetje over de Oekense Beek die naar het parallelle pad loop aan de andere kant van het water.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060332971
Sandal man (2022-05-16 18:43:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060317323
Hola, olvidaste las etiquetas de algunos edificios esta semana.
Saludos Jan
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 21:01:46+00:00): Nette verbetering.
Ik ga het nog iets verbeteren.
Dit leg ik vast in een filmpje, zodat je mee kunt kijken hoe ik dit gedaan heb.
Mocht je dit zelf kunnen neem dan gerust contact met me op.
De wijzigingen zijn met de JOSM editor gemaakt.

YouTube Filmpje:
https://youtu.be/Pf89m5DMh7U
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 21:02:42+00:00): willen kunnen bedoelde ik.
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 21:12:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. 
Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
tars4815 (2022-05-19 08:25:17+00:00): Buongiorno @davideblo,
sono Federica, faculty advisor di PoliMappers. Ho visto che nella mappatura stai includendo il nostro tag relativo al progetto ViaLibera focalizzato sull'area di Milano. Tuttavia, noto che il changeset include modifiche su altre zone. Inotre alcuni elementi mappati sembrano essere mappati come duplicati su elementi già presenti su OSM. Hai riscontrato qualche problema nella mappatura?
In attesa di un riscontro,
Saluti
Federica
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121023239
clairedelune (2022-05-23 11:38:59+00:00): (automatic Italian translation below)

Hello @davideblo
After checking all the edits made within Africa through this changeset, I've had to revert all of the African lakes you created since they already existed in a much higher quality version in OSM. In consequence, thousands of houses were appearing in the water, but this is now corrected.

The only place which still requires correction is Kirimoni 2 in which you digitized buildings, some of them correctly, some duplicating existing ones and some whose corners should be orthogonalized.
@tars4815, could you maybe support davideblo in correcting these? See for instance: openstreetmap.org/way/1060320460

Thank you,
Claire
--
Ciao @davideblo
Dopo aver controllato tutte le modifiche apportate in Africa tramite questo set di modifiche, ho dovuto ripristinare tutti i laghi africani che hai creato poiché esistevano già in una versione di qualità molto superiore in OSM. Di conseguenza, migliaia di case apparivano nell'acqua, ma ora questo è stato corretto.

L'unico punto che richiede ancora una correzione è Kirimoni 2 in cui hai digitalizzato edifici, alcuni correttamente, alcuni duplicando quelli esistenti e alcuni i cui angoli dovrebbero essere ortogonali.
@tars4815, potresti forse supportare davideblo nella correzione di questi? Vedi ad esempio: openstreetmap.org/way/1060320460

Grazie,
Claire
mariotomo (2022-05-15 20:01:11+00:00): hola IvanBranco …un dubbio, vedo molte persone che fanno questo, e non mi quadra: che senso ha dividere il landuse in corrispondenza dei sentieri di accesso alle coltivazioni?  il render mostra i sentieri, ma questi sono solo "buchi" fra le aree descritte.
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 20:12:16+00:00): Non sono pratico del sudamerica, da me le risaie solitamente sono separate dalle waterway dei fossi. Se quelli sono sentieri secondo me ha senso lasciare spazio in attesa che qualcuno li mappi. Io qua ho solto tolto il tag building=yes che era stato aggiunto per sbaglio presumo.
mariotomo (2022-05-15 20:52:20+00:00): sì, sì, mi era chiaro che avevo solo aggiustato il 'building', ma ne approfittavo per commentare su questa rappresentazione spezzettata, e non mi riferisco al solo sudamerica. prova a guardare in questa zona: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71329630

il concetto di "fosso" è molto toscano. io parlo di "sloot" che è forse il suo equivalente olandese. a Napoli magari si dicono "lagni" quelli maggiori. ma tutti quelli minori a me sembrano cadere dentro lo stesso landuse, mentre quelli maggiori mi sembra giusto distinguerli come natural=water.  più o meno così come li hanno disegnati lì in Olanda.  magari più ragionevole discuterne sul community?
saluti!! Mario.
legofahrrad (2022-05-21 14:14:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Bitte beachte die schon bestehenden Eigenschaften. Für Kontaktmöglichkeiten (Webseiten, E-Mail-Adressen, Telefonnummern…) gibt es derzeit zwei verschiedene Tagging-Möglichkeiten. Einerseits nur "website=*", aber auch "contact:website=*".
Hier war die Webseite schon mit contact-Präfix hinterlegt, daher brauchst du sie nicht nochmal ohne Präfix zu hinterlegen.
Du kannst die ganzen Tags sehen, wenn du im iD-Editor in der Leiste links nach unten scrollst und auf "alle Eigenschaften" klickst.
Viele Grüße!
fabiotofy (2022-05-16 09:39:37+00:00): guardate che il nome "DACIA ARENA" può essere utilizzato solo per gli eventi che riguardano l'udinese. Per tutto il resto il nome ufficiale è "Stadio Friuli". Quindi, dal mio punti di vista, boccio quest'ultimo changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121024000
stadiaarcadia (2022-05-19 06:56:24+00:00): That's okay.
Kogacarlo (2022-05-19 01:34:45+00:00): Ik heb jouw kazemat verplaatst en de juiste afmetingen gegeven.  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121169394

Als je nog meer S3's toevoegt dan kun je deze in JOSM CTRL-C CTRL-V'en en de juiste tags geven. Ik ben het trouwens compleet oneens met de tag "military" omdat dit geen militair ding meer is. Groetjes,
Tilia_J (2022-05-19 08:13:35+00:00): Ik snap je redenering over military.

Echter is het object nog steeds een bunker.

Ik ben alleen niet zo gelukkig met de toepassing van alle soorten lifecycle prefixes en tags en de gevolgen voor de rendering en/of datahandling.
Kogacarlo (2022-05-19 12:21:11+00:00): Ik geef ze altijd building=bunker. Net zoals building=church, wat ze ook niet altijd meer zijn.
Tilia_J (2022-05-19 12:50:41+00:00): Echter worden ze dan als gebouw weergegeven en niet met het bunkersymbool.

Ik ben wel voor het toevoegen van historic=yes en/of disused=yes.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-14 15:20:14+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
Bonjour norsud,
Il semblerait que la Communauté de Communes d’Yvetot (pas la commune comme je disais dans mon autre message) considère cet aménagement cyclable.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011739142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011739444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011739141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011739443
Est-ce que tu as observé sur le terrain une interdiction explicite ? Sinon on peut le passer en path. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
user_5359 (2022-05-16 09:23:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8829329187 (one of thirty eight). What is the meaning of the tag
dark_sky = medium
type = astronomy
?
Please notice the key type is reserved for a relation description.
qstep (2026-04-09 11:27:58+00:00): Kedves Zsolt! Ehhez a nagy számú csillagleső ponthoz mi volt az eredeti forrásod?
zsolt d (2026-04-12 09:46:43+00:00): Szia qstep!
Az ég-panoráma néző helyeket az amatőrcsillagászati gyakorlatomból veszem. 
Egyrészt eleve olyan helyek, ahol az áltanos fényszennyezettség kisebb. Ezekra van relatíve hasznos általános fényszennyezési térképek. Másrészt, ahol a helyi fényszennyezési források csekélyek, lehetőleg nincsenek. Olyan helyek, amik lehetőleg távolabb vannak bármely lakott helytől, tanáytól. Ezek jellemzően helyi fényszennyezést, és sokszor káprázásat is okozó helyi világítások, hibásan és jogsértően elhelyezett reflektorok. (vö: 2023.C tv.) Egy egy település széli ipari park, vagy akár a mezőgazdasági telepek, tanyák éjjeli kivilágítása is kárpárzást okozó fényvetőkkel történik. Ezen viszonylatok általános, globális fényszennezési térképen nem ábrázolhatóak. Továbbá lehetőleg a település fény-búráján kívül legyen, és 360 fokos ég-panoráma a jó. Fontos még az autóval való megközelíthetőség, többnyire makadám vagy földutakon, mert a 30-60kg felszerelést nem tudjuk a hátunkon kiszállítani.
Több forrása van a helyeknek. A Magyar Csillagászati Egyesületnek van észlelőhelyes adatbázis, ahol a fenti követlemények nagyrészt teljesülnek. Másrészt az amatőrcsillaágsz társak internetes beszámolóiban rendre szerepelnek megfelelő ég-panorámás helyek, illetve sajnos sokszor ezek megváltozása, romlása. És legfontosabb forrásom a személyes tapasztalataim, észleléseim. Bp 100-150km-es körzetében amatórcsillagász barátaimmal rendszeresen látogatom ezeket az ég-panorámás amatőrcsillagász észlelőhelyeket. Ahol változást érzékelünk, azokat kezelni szoktam. Pl. egy egy hely jellemzői megváltoznak, máshova kerül a körznyezetben, mert egyes földutakat lezárnak, vagy természetvédlemi területté nyilvánítják, ahova az autós kitelepülés , a behajtás tiltottá válik.
Tapasztalatom szerint a helyeket az amatőrcsillagász társak is használják, rendre találkozunk éjszakánként egy egy társunkkal.
üdv: Zsolt
infeeeee (2026-04-17 11:47:31+00:00): Van engedélyed az MCSE adataihoz? Ha igen, akkor töltsd fel ide kérlek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Importálás/Engedélyek

Ha nincs, akkor nem használhatod sajnos, és törölnünk kell az adatbázisból.

Leírásod alapján ezek nem felelnek meg az ellenőrizhetőség követelményének sem: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
kartler175 (2022-05-17 09:20:32+00:00): Pleas be carful editing relations. Your changes may affe:t further relations:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.66448&lat=48.82460&zoom=14&opacity=0.95
slice0 (2023-12-30 00:11:47+00:00): is this fix-me issue resolved with this changset https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7379419
francians (2022-05-16 04:33:09+00:00): Ciao raccoss,

access=yes è un tag da evitare, indica che è consentito transitare con qualsiasi mezzo, ed è il default. In generale, cerchiamo di non mettere i valori predefiniti, quindi, toglierei anche foot e bicycle. Puoi fare riferimento a questa tabella:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy

Buon mapping
Francesco
raccoss (2022-05-16 16:15:09+00:00): Capisco il punto. E' che ho provato a forzare questi tag perchè, provando a pianificare un gpx con Freemap, non mi lascia usare quel pezzo di sentiero che ho aggiunto (sono passato ieri di li, è nuovo).
Mi puoi aiutare?
francians (2022-05-18 04:38:18+00:00): Ciao,

Il motivo per cui non ti fa passare da lì è perché non è collegato con il sentiero... Non hanno nodi in comune. Vedrai che poi anche se togli i tag di accesso che hai aggiunto dovrebbe funzionare tutto.

Francesco
flother (2022-05-17 13:14:06+00:00): You seem to have introduced some errors in this changeset — for example, you've tagged a road as a roundabout (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434297143). Could you explain what you were trying to do? Then perhaps we can help you fix it.
mariotomo (2022-05-17 17:21:53+00:00): hola y bienvenido a OSM. por favor considera leer estas dos páginas del sitio de información wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
flother (2022-05-18 21:45:46+00:00): I think was vandalism (the user has since been banned) so I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121165517 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121165662. The change to the United States was reverted by jeslop in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121039034
Lokai (2022-05-16 10:03:19+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM. Einige Anmerkungen zu deinem Beitrag.

Das eine Gebäude, könnte durchaus aus mehreren Gebäuden bestehen. Die Umrisse sind schief, Rechtwinkligkeit erhälst du, wenn du nach dem Zeichen q drückst.
Bei Umrissen die Grundfläche zeichen, nicht die Dachfläche. Schau dir auch die ESRI Luftbilder zum Vergleich an,die könnte genauer sein (Meist).

Gruß
PT-53 (2022-05-24 06:22:50+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
nach Deiner Änderung dieses Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3993559007/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_node" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.88262&lat=48.30430&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Bitte korrigiere das veraltete / falsche Merkmal
- disused=yes

Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:disused:&uselang=de
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Railways#Lebenszyklus

Grüße
bigbug21 (2022-05-24 15:39:41+00:00): Danke, ist korrigiert. Upload folgt in Kürze.
PT-53 (2022-05-25 05:56:45+00:00): Kümmerst Du Dich dann auch noch darum:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115133797#map=10/48.0380/9.7608   ?
trial (2022-05-16 11:39:03+00:00): According to https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/493411743 you seem to modify objects with no changes. Your bot should be public and accepted before running it.
Hippa00 (2022-05-17 09:53:12+00:00): @trial Thanks for pointing out the modification with no change. This was due to a caching issue where the bot was working on a (few minutes) old dataset of schools with missing tags, and didn't reload the dataset after correcting the tags, hence it re-uploaded the correct tag even though it was already present. I was not aware that OSM did not automatically reject edits with no changes, hence I did not add that case in the bot. In any case, the bot was not intended to be ran again since it has already filled all the missing data, so we should be good.
Hippa00 (2022-05-17 09:54:56+00:00): PS: the wiki of automated edits did not mention anything about the way in which bots should be "public and accepted", could you direct me to the relevant resource ? Thanks
trial (2022-05-17 11:13:06+00:00): As the dataset is used in France, asking on the (French speaking) [OSM-talk-fr] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr would be a good start (possibly with a translation made by Deepl.com). The dataset you're using is AFAIK available on Osmose, Frédéric could say why he did not automate this part (possibly with good reasons, even if I don't see any right now except the lack of time to implement it). Looking at https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Hippa00 I see that you added collection times for mail boxes, On this list you see that David Faure asked for a bot on adding opening hours on post offices.
He triggered small change sets in order to avoid huge BBOX (bad for guys looking at a specific area or for some caches). https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/davidfaure_bot?username=davidfaure_bot
By the way, he has 2 accounts to split between the real user and the bot https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/davidfaure_bot
Glassman (2022-05-16 19:54:50+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting the old house, redraw to the new outline. That will preserve the house address as well as the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121025838
silversurfer83 (2022-05-16 16:34:01+00:00): Moin Knecht Ruprecht,
schön, dass Du bei OSM mitarbeitest :)
Ich möchte dich auf diesem Weg begrüßen (ich sehe an deinem Profil, dass du noch nicht so wahnsinnig viel bearbeitet hast) und dir ein paar kleine Tips zu deiner Bearbeitung geben.
Ich sehe, dass bei dem Haus, dass du eingefügt hast, noch ein Adressknoten innerhalb des Gebäudes vorhanden ist. Du hast die Adresse aber auch an das Gebäude selbst geschrieben. Beide  Varianten sind möglich und üblich, jedoch wird entweder das eine, oder das andere genutzt. Daher sollte die Adresse aus dem Gebäude entfernt werden oder der Knoten gelöscht werden.
Eine schöne Funktion im Editor, den du benutzt hast (iD) ist, dass man Flächen mit einem Knopfdruck rechtwinklig oder rund machen kann. Einfach die neu gezeichnete Fläche auswählen und die Taste Q drücken. Schon sind alle Ecken rechtwinklig.
Wenn Fragen sind, meld dich gerne, unter anderem in einem dieser Kanäle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
und auch sonst ist das Wiki häufig sehr hilfreich, gut zu erreichen über den "i" - Knopf neben den meisten Eingabefeldern im Editor. 

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
user_5359 (2022-05-16 09:03:42+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte schiebe Deinen Eintrag bitte in die ungefähre Gebäudeposition.
nevw (2022-05-16 00:26:21+00:00): Hi
Is this spelt correctly…
Twilinght Street
yrkyork (2022-05-16 11:11:22+00:00): no its "Twilight Street"
nevw (2022-05-16 11:51:19+00:00): Thanks for fixing.
muralito (2022-05-17 12:52:10+00:00): Estos tramos no son red terciaria. Es Hola. camino departamental sin asfaltar, por eso van como "unclassified".
user_5359 (2022-05-17 09:35:44+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tags
Marco = 1666 CAMPANHÃM
ref = ref:mhs=*
?
MRibz (2022-05-21 17:34:33+00:00): Hi,
It is a very old granite landmark located at the administrative borders of the city of Porto, whose model dates back to the 17th century.  This mark has the year and name of the old parish, today Campanhã. 
Thank you,
Regards,
M
user_5359 (2022-05-21 19:50:04+00:00): Thank you for explaining the value, but again the first key is certainly not from British English. Also the second key has a problem, the second equal sign is very unusual.
user_5359 (2022-05-16 10:03:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please change the way https://www.osm.org/way/445907145 for you modification.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-18 11:56:45+00:00): Please stop. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
ConnorWong (2022-05-24 13:43:47+00:00): Hi Someone Else,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9742244789 is interestingly solitaire.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-24 14:06:20+00:00): There are some unmapped fences around here, and it's in one of those.  I don't think that there is up to date aerial imagery either, although the large barns and houses match I think.
km2bp (2022-05-17 06:04:15+00:00): Witaj na OSM ! Moje gratulacje.  Wszystkie linki które przypiszesz obiektom każdy będzie mógł też zobaczyć w aplikacji mobilnej OSMAnd  oraz na wiele innych sposobów.  Miłego współtworzenia map. Tylko niczego nie popsuj nie usuwaj ni nie zmieniaj jeśli nie masz pewności. W razie czego pytaj na forum.  Zapraszam też z przydatnymi instrukcjami które zamieściłem na swoim profilu  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/km2bp Pozdrawiam!
km2bp (2022-05-17 06:05:10+00:00): Korekta: Zapoznaj się z przydatnymi....
5m4u9 (2022-05-16 05:15:22+00:00): hola, después de dibujar el área del edificio/casa seria bueno que rectangulices las áreas para que no queden mal dibujadas.
mbeyerle (2023-11-26 21:19:56+00:00): well put and thank you
❤️‍🔥 (2022-05-16 04:02:05+00:00): Hi, you wouldn't be allowed to drive a car down the Remutaka Rail Trail, even if you politely asked GWRC or DOC, so it's not correct to add `motor_vehicle=permit` to this trail, see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:access=permit

(except for the small section northwest of https://osm.org/node/272776225)


Also, please don't remove the tags `bicycle=designated` and `foot=designated`, or downgrade them to `*=yes`, since they are very important for routing software. (see https://osm.org/changeset/110939910 and https://osm.org/changeset/111562537 )
AlwynWellington (2022-05-16 04:50:24+00:00): Thank you for your comments.
You will note that vehicles is tagged =Permit.
On all my recent trips I have observed several vehicles along the upper reaches of the rail trail.  Users included Hutt Valley High School and private users accessing the shooting range.

If you consider the description of "Track" in the Wiki you will see that tag is appropriate.

Tagging as "designated" does not affect route relations.  Any signage is simply describing who has access.
Designated was not previously applied to the track from the Maymorn car park nor to the service roads near Tunnel Gully.
 This lack of "designated" does not seem to affect routing.  Routing is determined by the application of a route, regardless of the highway type.

Please do not adjust my edits.  They are principled.

Please discuss principles more widely at Talk NZ if you wish.

best regards
AlwynWellington (2022-05-16 04:54:11+00:00): With great respect, you do not have ownership of the Remutaka Rail Trail.
You should not alter my principled edits without prior discussion and agreeing how to move forward.

Please revert any changes you have made today to this route.

As offered before, please raise a discussion on Talk NZ

best regards
AlwynWellington (2022-05-16 05:37:13+00:00): Having read back my latest post, I can see some might see it as not temperate.

I would appreciate your explanation, supported by references to the help Wiki, as to why marking cycle or foot=designated assists routing for both walkers and cyclists.  Especially, as it the case here the residential and service roads along the route do not appear to have any access marked as "designated"

I ask as, having created and maintained many route relations and not used the "designated" tag, these routes seem fine many years later.

Best wishes
❤️‍🔥 (2022-05-16 11:25:58+00:00): Hi, I haven't made any changes to these trails for several months... Please also note that no one has "ownership" over any features in OSM, we should all aim to map things as best as possible.

You're right, the difference between "designated" and "yes" does not affect route relations, but it is important to distinguish the difference between:
- a path that is designed for cycling (e.g. the Remutaka Rail Trail would have bicycle=designated), 
- vs a path that is not designed for cycling, yet cycling is still allowed (e.g. the Kāpiti Expressway would have bicycle=yes).

More info here: https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:access=designated

Regarding `motor_vehicle=permit`, this is tricky, but the wiki page says "This tag should be used in cases where a permit is required, but is routinely granted to everyone requesting it". You would know better than me whether this definition is appropriate, but I don't think it makes sense south of the Siberia Tunnel, where there are anti-car barriers, no useful destination for cars, nowhere to turn around for several kilometers, and no car access without going thru private property.

More info here: https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:access=permit
AlwynWellington (2022-05-16 23:39:12+00:00): Thank you
I suspect the purpose of having to request access is to, amongst other considerations, to ensure the requestor meets relevant conditions.  When that occurs, the permits is routinely granted..
In this case being an accredited user of the rifle range about 500 metres from Kaitoke car park would result in a permission (and key) being routinely granted.

Vehicle=yes is not an option.

The other practical (documented) option is to tag: vehicle=private.  

I was loathe to do that as I did not know how that might affect other uses of this Trail within OSM.

Your thoughts

best wishes
❤️‍🔥 (2022-05-17 05:32:39+00:00): I agree that motor_vehicle=permit makes sense for the small section northwest of https://osm.org/node/272776225, sorry if that wasn't clear in my original message. But motor_vehicle=permit doesn't seem right for the other end of the trail, especially south-east of the Siberia Tunnel (see previous message).


More importantly, could you please explain why you're changing some access restrictions from "designated" to "yes", and deleting the bicycle= and foot= tags? I don't quite understand your explanation in https://osm.org/changeset/110939910 and https://osm.org/changeset/111562537