piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cartomatto (2019-12-01 12:12:39+00:00): Non ricordo dove ho preso il dato, ma l'ho certamente preso da qualche mappa del parco. Tuttavia secondo quest'altra mappa http://www.parchireali.gov.it/parco.mandria/pdf/mappa.pdf molto recente si chiamerebbe in parte Strada Bizzarria e in parte Strada lungo muro, senza che sia ben definito quale è un tratto e quale l'altro. Probabilmente cambia a seconda di chi e quando redige la mappa, non essendo un elemento così "ufficiale".
canfe (2019-12-02 08:10:11+00:00): Interessante. In effetti si potrebbero aggiungere parecchi toponimi, magari aggiungendo come fonte il pdf che mi citi.
Se conosci bene il posto...  ;-)
LafarM (2022-07-21 17:07:29+00:00): Chyba coś jest źle z tymi adresami. Znajdują się poza Łęczną. Tutaj nic nie ma - pola.
literan (2015-06-04 13:27:53+00:00): Адрес нужно ставить не на точку, а на контур здания, в name= писать ничего не надо (только если здание имеет имя собственное, например name=Жилой комплекс "Звезда"), в номере букву корпуса писать слитно с номером (addr:housenumber=10Г). Иначе навигаторы этот адрес находить не будут. Я по этой правке все поправил.
Hjart (2015-06-04 20:07:32+00:00): Your edits to the coastline in the SW corner of this box created a problem which I have fixed.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-04 13:51:14+00:00): lanes= nie służy do oznaczania szerokości jezdni, tylko do liczby wymalowanych pasów ruchu. Jeśli droga jest wąska sugeruję użyć tagu width=
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=351437060
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2017-12-20 14:46:51+00:00): Veel voor HOT OSM gemapt. Nu ook in Nederland daarom aslnog .. 
Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
fkv (2015-06-04 20:13:55+00:00): Way 161951331 ist mit maxspeed=70 + source:maxspeed=AT:urban getaggt. Das ist ein Widerspruch. Wahrscheinlich gehört source:maxspeed auf sign geändert (oder ganz weg).
Florian77711 (2015-06-04 21:07:08+00:00): Danke für den Hinweise, wurde beim Bearbeiten übersehen, ist bereits gefixt.
EugenyN (2015-07-18 16:12:28+00:00): почему беседка http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3503058205 на динамо "уехала" вверх к больнице ?
Mr_Brown (2015-06-04 17:50:18+00:00): These ways may be a paved walking path, but it's definitely NOT residential
ramyaragupathy (2015-06-10 09:33:32+00:00): Thanks for the information! I have updated the highway type accordingly.
Jojo4u (2015-06-14 14:32:31+00:00): Aufpassen, cycleway sperrt Fußgänger aus. Ich hab es durchgängig in eine Richtung als path in die andere als cycleway da dort Bürgsteig separat.
d1g (2016-04-09 20:08:06+00:00): Привет! 

В некоторых регионах Имплозия позакрывалась, а где-то - названия сменились, уточни как время будет:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3572348906/history
SDmitrii (2016-04-12 11:57:48+00:00): Привет. Проверю на днях, спасибо.
a_aron22 (2015-06-04 16:47:54+00:00): Old Osterville Elementary School
utack (2016-03-04 02:08:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351469902 ist inzwischen glaube ich im Luftbild "Bayern 80cm"
udyat (2015-06-04 16:41:11+00:00): Camino de Alberite a Clavijo
reneegruner (2015-06-04 16:42:21+00:00): I added Papyrus Way which can be seen on Instant Street View and is only a single resident way
A_Tang24 (2015-06-04 16:42:24+00:00): Previously an unidentified house, but is now edited to display the residence of MERLESENA, PAUL X & ELLEN H.
trigpoint (2015-06-04 16:59:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
This is useful stuff to add, however you should probably add an extra tag amenity=community_centre to ensure it shows up in searches.
FlyingAce (2015-06-04 18:22:45+00:00): Thanks!
weiming4399 (2015-06-10 22:05:15+00:00): Edited with help of Google Street Maps.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-06 11:23:00+00:00): Hi - I'm guessing that this node was added by a BitcoinMaps user.  The problem was, it was a duplicate of something that was already mapped (in this case, by me!).  How does the BitcoinMaps "add" process help users avoid the addition of duplicates?

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend

(both a local mapper and a member of OSM's Data Working Group)
trigpoint (2015-06-04 19:37:25+00:00): Hi, you seem to have deleted a footpath which passes through a housing estate.
Why have you deleted this when it clearly needs to be fixed and the obvious legal line is clearly visible on aerial imagery.
I am reverting this change
andygol (2015-06-04 19:53:47+00:00): @trigpoint. Here is fixme tag with value "footpath wanders through random housnig areas with no apparent path" and indeed it is. This situation persists for a long time. If you know how the path should go really - please correct it.
trigpoint (2015-06-04 20:01:43+00:00): I have fixed it, the imagery is very clear in this area and the likely route is clear as day.
Out of copyright OS 1937-61 confirms that there was no building on the line of the path, it just wasn't drawn very well.
To assume a PROW has gone because of development is wrong, an alternative is one of the perrequisits of gaining planning permission.
andygol (2015-06-04 20:07:01+00:00): It's great! Thank you for your attention and correction of my mistakes. With hope for further cooperation Andygol
SomeoneElse (2015-06-04 23:01:12+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just spotted that the phone number on your coffee shop http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278428791 might be missing a 6 - I'm guessing it's +441246 not just +44124.

Anyway, best of luck with the business - I might drop in for a coffee if I'm waiting for a pizza from next door.  

Cheers,
Andy
PT-53 (2017-02-03 16:22:22+00:00): Hallo oli-f,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. auch diese Landfläche ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351477503 ) neu angelegt. Leider hast Du dabei die Knoten der Landfläche und der Landstraße miteinander verschmolzen.
Ich habe gerade die neuen Straßen in Untermarchtal anhand Maps4BW ergänzt. Nun sollte man noch die Landflächen residential und farmland entsprechend verschieben. Dazu müssen Straße und Landfläche voneinander getrennt werden. Machst Du das ?
Landflächen und Straßen sollten nie miteinander verklebt werden. Das gibt nur Mehrarbeit wie hier jetzt.
Grüße
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-04 21:15:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351516884 - nie ma potrzeby rysowania tam lewoskrętów - uprościłem do tej jednej linii.
Swoją drogą, to musi być udręka mapować w edytorze, którzy nie pokazuje pasów ruchu...
Taki JOSM potrafi, np. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=503098#p503098
Slawek_n (2015-06-05 10:06:11+00:00): Można wiedzieć dlaczego skasowałeś drogi dojazdowe do posesji na Posadzie?
Maliniorz (2015-06-05 10:32:45+00:00): Widocznie przez przypadek.
Self-Perfection (2015-06-05 09:54:50+00:00): Здравствуйте.

У вас в этой правке https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351495202 обозначен как building=building_passage . Наверняка же по ошибке? Поправьте пожалуйста.
darkwish (2015-06-05 10:08:09+00:00): Спасибо за замечание, поправил.
Tchiller (2016-07-07 13:46:55+00:00): Gibt es den tag amenity=assembly hall? Kann es nicht finden. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149711182
Danke!
maraf24 (2015-06-04 21:35:34+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station
GerdP (2015-11-11 15:32:17+00:00): please review:
What was meant with
oneway=Marsh Lane
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351500357
I would guess name=Marsh Lane,
but that's the name of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351500357
and service roads typically have no name.
calfarome (2015-11-11 15:58:23+00:00): Hello GerdP.
you're right, it was a mistake on my part, I corrected the corresponding tags for this street. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351500357/history 
Thank you for your notification.
GerdP (2015-11-11 16:04:02+00:00): thanks for the quick feedback :-)
maraf24 (2015-06-04 20:24:02+00:00): A ta kładka (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351501148) jest przejezdna dla samochodów? Jej szerokość jest porównywalna z szerokością samochodów na zdjęciu.
Adam_Piszczek (2015-06-04 21:55:51+00:00): no właśnie miałem to pytanie też zadać,ale mi się wydaje że tak przejezdna,zaraz poniżej też jest kładka i raczej dla pieszych.
maraf24 (2015-06-04 22:40:05+00:00): Zastanowiło mnie użycie terminu kładka, zwykle nie używa się go gdy samochody mogą jeździć.
Skoro nie wiemy, to może tak zostać. Najwyżej ktoś zgłosi błąd :P
Constable (2019-09-28 14:39:55+00:00): ciao, vedo che la modifica è vecchia, però sei sicuro esista questa sterrata https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351504106  ? non mi sembra visibile su nessuna delle immagini aeree disponibili
Grazie!
Aury88 (2015-06-05 06:58:16+00:00): ciao Euplio,
Perchè hai cancellato La città della scienza ?
Io' (2015-06-10 16:34:03+00:00): Ti ho replicato privatamente. Non potendo modificarne il tracciato, ho dovuto cancellarla e ridisegnarla.
Walerianczyk (2015-06-05 06:42:53+00:00): Cześć,wszystko by było dobrze po twojej poprawce gdybyś też uprościl zjazdy,a tak nie wiem,poczekam na tę aktualizację,zobaczymy.
Np przy jeździe w lewo z A Solidarności na Dolna 3 maja nawigacja  informuje o jeździe na wprost przy punkcie zjazdu w prawo ,a potem D...nie można zmienić pasa bo jest ciągła linia,kończąc zgadzam się z tobą jeżeli chodzi o max uproszczeń,ale to ma granice ,gdy uproszczenie utrudnia jazdę.
To skrzyżowanie ma przy światłach pięć pasów,a ze skrajnych nie da się jechać  na wprost. a trzy w środku nakazują tylko jazdę na wprost.Pozdrawiam.
Ps Uruchom symulację jazdy na to miejsce to wiele wyjaśni i uprości.
Walerianczyk (2015-06-05 06:52:11+00:00): Pisząć "zjazdy" mialem na myśli prawoskręty ,które robią tu niezłe kino.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-05 09:09:31+00:00): A dlaczego założyłeś, że jakakolwiek nawigacja jest wyznacznikiem tego, że coś jest narysowane dobrze lub źle? Generalnie nawigacje oparte na OSM są dosyć świeżym tematem i jeszcze mnóstwo poprawek je czeka, zanim zaczną działać idealnie.
Prawoskrętów nie likwidowałem, bo te pasy są rozdzielone fizycznie wysepkami.
skquinn (2020-01-16 20:33:01+00:00): Unless a road is actually *named* "Access Road" (i.e. something on that road would have an address of 1234 Access Road), that should not be used in name=*. I have reclassified these as service roads.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-25 16:08:08+00:00): Hi - hope you don't mind, but I changed a couple of "shop=card_shop" in Ashford to "shop=card".  See http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=shop%3Dcard for the current usage of the two tags.  I'm assuming that there's no subtle difference in meaning between shop=card_shop and shop=card that I'm not aware of - let me know if there is.
ppece (2015-06-04 22:30:43+00:00): Znowu większość zmian stanowią budynki, a Ty wspominasz o czymś pobocznym w opsie.

Czy Ty myślisz, że to mnie robisz na złość, że nie dajesz odpowiednich opisów zmian? W ten sposób pokazujesz tylko, że lekceważysz całą społeczność, bo to właśnie jako udogodnienie dla społeczności funkconują opisy zmian. Zrozumże, tu nie chodzi o Twoją wygodę (bo palec Ci się zmęczy od nadmiaru pisania), ani nawet moją wygodę, tylko o wygodę wszystkich pozostałych userów. Czy w Wikipedii też tak olewczo podchodziłeś do tej kwestii?
isteinbach (2018-07-24 12:35:01+00:00): Wäre es nicht sinnvoller den FKK-Bereich statt als Linie 301099167 als Fläche (mit Beschriftung) zu kennzeichnen?
wille (2015-06-06 22:44:15+00:00): Na verdade o local mudou de nome. então reverti e fiz a alteração
http://www.jornaldebrasilia.com.br/viva/533241/publico-fiel-nao-aprova-novo-gates/
Vid the Kid (2015-10-31 01:32:16+00:00): Why did you delete the proposed Portsmouth Bypass?  This road is now being built.  I have seen it.  If you are so accustomed to editing in Ethiopia that you write "Ethiopia" as the summary for every changeset, I have little confidence in the credibility of your edit(s) in Ohio.
naoliv (2015-09-08 01:30:54+00:00): LucFreitas, tem como você verificar algumas localidades que você inseriu aqui?
Por exemplo, esse está incompleto? (ou talvez com nome errado) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3573536294
Esse aqui, o que seria o "(bnh)" do nome? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3573535688
LucFreitas (2015-09-08 02:50:03+00:00): Prontamente, naoliv.

Sobre o primeiro, é o nome que também aparece na relação de limite, importada anteriormente do IBGE (1915786). Corrigirei a inicial minúscula.

No segundo, a sigla BNH seria referente ao Banco Nacional de Habitação, e aparentemente seria um nome popular do bairro, que colocarei como alt_name.

Alguns erros como estes passaram desapercebidos por mim quando fiz a revisão dos dados (manualmente; não sei se existe uma maneira automatizada para fazer isto).

Obrigado por me avisar, os exemplos já estão corrigidos.
naoliv (2015-09-08 02:53:38+00:00): Obrigado!
SomeoneElse (2015-07-12 09:56:38+00:00): It looks like this removed some wikidata links from e.g. relation 153558.  Just wondered if that was deliberate (because they were wrong) or accidental?  See:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=153558
muralito (2015-07-13 11:14:05+00:00): Was a revert of the previous changeset, that changed the key iso3166 to uppercase ISO3166 in all the region.

The wikidata links were removed as side effect.
GerdP (2015-11-04 16:48:13+00:00): please review:
I've changed several ways tagged 
highway=unpaved (deprecated tag)
or just surface=unpaved.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35083176
victor_1982 (2015-06-05 04:26:40+00:00): cambio de nombre a Cuarto Cinturon Vial como es conocido actualmente
wambacher (2015-06-05 07:35:03+00:00): Hi, your buildings are very strange and ugly. please type s (the small letter "s") before uploading. this will rectify those buildings.

did it for this actual one.

regards
walter
maxphizik (2015-06-07 07:33:38+00:00): Как я понимаю границы не честные, а пожарные. Должно быть fire_boundary=yes. Если границы районов выезда пожарных частей совпададают с административными границами не надо рисовать линии рядом с ними, а создать новое отношение, включить в него линии входящие в административную границу, и уже на это новое отношение вешать теги .
freeExec (2015-06-07 15:33:10+00:00): Что за разукраску "нет карты" и прочии объекты неправильно обозначены ты тут устроил?
alain2003 (2015-06-05 14:41:32+00:00): hi,
I cheked the arrondissements but there is nothing wrong with it.
it seems that you fixed them all.
Xmypblu (2015-06-06 15:00:31+00:00): есть хоткей для выравнивания углов - "s"
зачем так криво обрисовывать и создавать себе и другим дополнительную работу по исправлению?
PeterCapizziMD (2015-06-05 10:22:52+00:00): Peter Capizzi MD - Plastic Surgeon has honed his skills and cultivated an expertise in breast augmentation charlotte, including augmentation, revision, lifts, reduction and reconstruction; and body contouring surgeries such as tummy tucks, liposuction and body lifts after weight loss.
GerdP (2015-10-19 08:21:11+00:00): please review:
The tag highway=collapsed_footbridge is is rarely used. Consider highway=construction or highway=dismantled or highway=abandoned
fra76mm (2015-06-05 13:15:41+00:00): Togliendo il tag natural=water alle saline non vengono più renderizzate, secondo me deve rimanere.
Inoltre non ho capito a cosa serve la way senza tag attorno a Bertinoro
morsi (2015-06-05 15:00:43+00:00):  il wiki sulle saline non contempla il tag water (infatti l'acqua non c'è)...
La way intorno a Bertinoro non ha tag perchè è un multipoligono (landuse=residential)
Hjart (2015-06-05 12:41:44+00:00): Ha, du tager dem i alfabetisk orden?
AE35 (2015-06-05 12:51:45+00:00): Ja - Jeg har fået fra Wikipedia DK alle artikler som de har geotagget men som ikke er i OSM endnu. Men de geotagger også ting der ikke findes mere fx 
Arbejdernes Fællesbageri, Aborreparken, Aflytningscentralen i
Helsingør"  - disse smides selvfølgelig ikke ind i OSM - Jeg finder også ting OSM ikke har med endnu - Fx Baronens Høj, Amager Internationale Skole osv Der er ca. 6000 på deres liste. Jeg vil hvis der er stemning i OSM DK for det evt. lave et fælles projekt sammen med nogle fra Wikipedia DK - så folk tager et bogstav hver og gennemgår.
maraf24 (2015-06-25 08:56:00+00:00): Co to za teren?
Co oznacza numer 1/2?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-06-11 22:36:25+00:00): Hvad er den runde ting?
ianlopez1115 (2015-06-05 13:32:00+00:00): Note: I encourage people to check or verify if this set of edits are accurate and/or factual. Corrections are more than welcome.
literan (2015-06-06 11:23:26+00:00): И что это за линия без тегов такая? зачем? Удаляю.
ndm (2015-06-05 23:41:11+00:00): Comment could be more descriptive -- looks more like a speed limit change and adding "foot=yes".

I'm not sure about the "foot=yes" access tag. There's always "sidewalk = left/right/both" might be less "legal" -- unless it really is a designated footpath?
RafalR (2015-07-11 08:03:14+00:00): Ścieżka wyrysowana po złej stronie chodnika
naoliv (2015-06-05 14:55:06+00:00): Wesley, por favor, não faça tais modificações.
Nakaner (2015-06-28 22:44:15+00:00): OSM ist nicht der richtige Platz für temporäre Daten. Zwei Wochen sind eindeutig temporär.
***juggernaut*** (2015-06-29 05:20:49+00:00): Ich weiß ja nicht, aber für mich sieht das nicht nach "zwei Wochen" aus: http://vmz.karlsruhe.de/pdf/muehlburg.pdf
Nakaner (2015-06-29 18:14:59+00:00): Ok, du hast recht. Ich habe mich soeben sogar vor Ort von der Richtigkeit überzeugt. Entschuldigung.
Harald Hartmann (2016-12-06 14:52:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228484668: shouldn't it be generator:source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:generator:source) instead of power:source? What is about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:generator:method
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-24 09:46:56+00:00): 99.9% sure that Tiger 2014 data is wrong here with where they have 'Fontana Drive'.  That is clearly a service road and a parking lot for a business, and normally wouldn't have a road name.  Pretty sure that this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11728956 ) is the true 'Fontana Drive'.  Thus, I've turned the one you added into a 'service' highway & removed the name in Changeset 32179177. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32179177
ediyes (2015-06-26 14:52:59+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for fixed this error. For now we are using Tiger2014 as a reference of names. 

Edith
SomeoneElse (2015-12-20 21:47:38+00:00): Hi - while importing stuff into a rendering database, I noticed that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351677973 has layer=17 on it.  That's obviously not invalid, but may not have been what was intended :)
brianboru (2015-12-28 12:55:25+00:00): Correctd to layer 1
BeKri (2016-10-09 14:30:00+00:00): Servus,
ist mir grad aufgefallen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351678595
Mit dem tag komm ich irgendwie nicht klar ...
Solarpanel auf einer Linie ?
Gruss derBeKri
muralito (2015-06-06 01:04:39+00:00): NOOOO!!!
No esta duplicado!!!!

Una cosa la oficina de esa empresa y otra la direccion.
Ademas en una misma direccion com esa que es edificio pueden haber muchas empresas.
d1g (2015-06-05 23:34:01+00:00): Здания переменной этажности обозначаются через building:part=yes

Ваш объект: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104640837
Пример как это можно отметить:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3899814
DaveF (2015-06-05 17:51:12+00:00): Ha! You beat me to it.

There's a slight updated plan Jan '15 amended road markings, loading bays etc.
Are you going to add the contraflow bike lane?
According to plan the call box is still there
DaveF (2015-06-05 18:06:20+00:00): http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/sites/default/files/widcombe_parade_revised_scheme_plan.pdf
OSM User 1 (2015-06-06 01:39:58+00:00): Ha I should have left it! Thought I'd give it a crack in case no one else did. Feel free to put more detail into it.

Can you move where one live intersectes another. For example Prior Park Road intersects the roundabout where the path down the side of the Church, but I'd like to separate these nodes and can't see how to do it - I end up deleting the whole of one of the lines...!
OSM User 1 (2015-06-06 01:41:18+00:00): Monday at work (I'm working at Council nowadays) I should be able to move the bus stops officially on the system. I don't know how often OSM syncs with the national database, but I see their positions are determined by Naptan which is what I should be editing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-28 16:30:31+00:00): I know that it is an old edit - but please, do NOT add anything based on Google maps.
mataka (2015-06-05 16:42:17+00:00): à completer si nécessaire par la communauté
ViriatoLusitano (2015-06-07 01:12:12+00:00): Hey fx99, thank you for constantly fixing up admin problems here in Portugal in result of my addition of administrative boundaries.

I just want to tell you you need not to worry about them because after I finish with all admin_level=7 relations I will focus on admin_level=8 or lower ones.

All in all I feel bad about you losing precious time. :(
mgoog (2024-01-12 03:50:17+00:00): Zamknięta na stałe
Thomas8122 (2015-06-06 05:01:26+00:00): Was soll das bitte sein?
Socks (2015-06-05 21:23:41+00:00): I've never used planning documents for Openstreetmap because they all seem to be based on Ordnance Survey base maps. What's the licence situation here?
Govanus (2015-06-07 16:45:32+00:00): I don't use the site plans for traceings wich could be questionable or direct data conversion to enter on to OSM which is not likly to pass at all but I do use the planning records to understand more about what I trying to map espcially when other sources of potential traceing imagery are diffcult to understand and use because of trees and sites are either new or difficult to access.
  Effectivly I'm not useing OS data directly and am combining it with a range of data sources and survey visits to effectivly redraw from scratch into OSM (its why it is oftern only relitly possitionly accurate and of low sensitivity {in meseament terms obvioussly}.

planning documents can allow you to understand why an old wall is where it is and what it used to be related to for positional queing with a bing/sat image.

Also the non map documents can give additional information for tagging and ref's such as tree surveys hight data. roof and level and basement info etc.

I think this use of publicly available infomation to make a better informed entry is probably ok.  It kind of like avoiding plagerism while reading around a subjuct for an assey entry.

Note should be taken also that infomation given in planning might not have produced a end result that matches the plans so site investigations are still important, to check stuff.
neuhausr (2015-06-08 14:02:59+00:00): I'm guessing this wasn't really based on the Nepal imagery? :)  (see changeset source)
abel801 (2015-06-09 19:26:13+00:00): Posibly this was because I was using keybord shortcuts. I have changed the source. Thanks for your help.
tyr_asd (2015-06-12 07:43:35+00:00): Würde für so einen Brunnen nicht besser amenity=drinking_water (anstatt man_made=standpipe) passen? Siehe auch http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3586177795
hongakonga (2015-06-12 08:42:32+00:00): ja, das ist richtig. Ich hab die Änderungen über OsmAnd hinzugefügt und da war das die Belegung für Brunnen. Kannst du das bitte ändern? Hab gerade keinen richtig INet Zugang.
tyr_asd (2015-06-12 10:30:13+00:00): erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31917144
maraf24 (2015-06-11 19:20:21+00:00): opening_hours=Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00
Składnia  jest bardzo restrykcyjna, a SKOKi nie są czynne w weekendy.
shrddr (2015-06-22 08:20:41+00:00): you've broken the library
C-in-Berlin (2015-06-22 15:47:20+00:00): I made the upper part of the library visible. I think it should stay visible. But if you can improve the polygon structure you are very welcome. Thanks.
jlcod (2015-08-17 17:34:06+00:00): Hallo, ist das echt eine private verkehrsberuhigte Straße? access=private kommt mir hier etwas seltsam vor.
df9ik (2015-08-17 18:15:09+00:00): Ja, das stimmt hier zu 100%.
Die Straße ist auch deutlich an der Pflasterung zu unterscheiden. Das Liegenschaftskataster klärt dann die restl. Zweifel :-)
Die Stichstr. davor ist genauso. Auch wenn es hier auf den ersten Blick nicht ganz so leicht zu unterscheiden ist.
jlcod (2015-08-17 18:54:04+00:00): okay :)
pfg21 (2017-02-24 19:39:58+00:00): объекты отмеченные note=ilmeny2015 существуют в данное время ??