piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-10-17 17:07:23+00:00): Hallo Chundelac,
entschuldige, sehe gerade du bist neu bei OSM – Willkommen in der Community. Meine Frage war, ob du die Tour selbst gefahren bist. In dem Fall wäre „source=survey“ richtig. Hast du die Karte und/oder GPX-Track der Webseite benutzt, dann ist deine Angabe „source=Webseite“ korrekt.
ABER, es verletzt das Urheberrecht, sofern du keine explizite Erlaubnis vom Autor zur Verwendung in OSM hast. Das Copyright muss nicht erwähnt werden um zu bestehen, hier wird aber explizit gesagt: „Das Copyright für veröffentlichte, vom Autor selbst erstellte Objekte bleibt allein beim Autor der Seiten“. Zitat aus https://www.joglland-waldheimat.at/service/impressum/ 
Ich bin dir gerne behilflich beim Klären. LG Robert
Fischkopp0815 (2020-11-13 07:43:23+00:00): Ich habe die Straße mit CS 94042250 wiederhergestellt. Sie ist doch noch vorhanden. Ist die Durchfahrt durch eine Beschilderung verboten? Dann bitte die access-Tags für die Straße erfassen.Oder verhindert eine bauliche Maßnahme irgendwo im Verlauf die Durchfahrt? Dann bitte das Hindernis eintragen. Oder melde dich hier in der Changeset-Diskussion mit einer genaueren Beschreibung.
Jarek 🚲 (2020-09-17 17:48:04+00:00): Also changed some existing alignments which dated back to 2007
AkuAnakTimur (2020-09-17 17:56:25+00:00): Quote:

We only map roads in OSM as dual-carriageway (two ways going in both directions) only if there is a physical barrier or median separating the two directions. If it's just a painted line, just map it as a single way in OSM.

Unquote. Such links should not be mapped.

https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410
karson_ (2020-09-17 18:47:17+00:00): It looks like you know about the 'square' command. There is also a 'circularize' command which takes a closed way and makes it circular. The aboveground pools you added would be a perfect application of the 'circularize' feature.
ChillyDL (2020-09-17 21:28:48+00:00): Hallo,
kann man sich wirklich in allen diesen fünf bisherigen Eiscafés nicht mehr hinsetzen, sondern nur noch am Tresen zum Mitnehmen kaufen? Das kommt mir merkwürdig vor. Auf Facebook sieht man auf Fotos von Juli z. B. im Eiscafé Cortina noch besetzte Tische und Stühle. amenity=cafe und cuisine=ice_cream wären dann passend, oder?
Viele Grüße!
eggie (2020-09-17 19:30:36+00:00): Dag Maarten..
Prima om winkels toe te voegen of info aan te vullen....maar beter je edit gebied klein te houden met editor iD. Dus niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Het levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Mvg
Eggie
MaartenTheMapper (2020-09-17 19:32:56+00:00): Thanks voor de tip, dan smeer ik het voortaan uit over losse changesets.
eggie (2020-09-17 20:33:17+00:00): Top!

Kijk ook eens naar editor JOSM
Daar schuif je met de rechtermuisknop.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710      
Maar ook met josm het mapgebied klein houden.  

Gr Eggie
Myazyk (2020-10-23 20:41:53+00:00): Яким же то треба бути дурнем, аби адміністративну межу між сільрадами перетворити у дорогу лісами та горами!
Прошу виправити
videm (2020-10-24 05:15:18+00:00): дурню, було промаплено частинку дороги, яка попередньо відображалась як тупик, довжиною кілька десятків метрів, а в реальності це лісова дорога, шириною 3-4 метри, розбита лісовозами, і довжиною кілька сотень метрів.
Ніхто твої адміністративні межі не рухав
os-emmer (2025-03-30 20:57:20+00:00): Hi qwonka,
I have a question about your edit. Could you maybe have a look into this note? Thanks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4689449
PT-53 (2020-09-18 07:26:55+00:00): Hallo Jakob48,
hast Du mfbehrens99 von Deinem Revert unterrichtet? Ich sehe keinen CS-Kommentar.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-18 07:37:07+00:00): PS:
Gemeint war dieser Änderungssatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90978611
von Mapper artem95vlasovets
Jakob48 (2020-09-19 11:37:52+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

dieser CS ist mir bekannt. Ich brauche da keine Erinnerung. Einen Kommentar habe ich in seinem CS hinterlassen.

Gruß
Jakob48
PT-53 (2020-09-19 13:33:29+00:00): Aber erst, nachdem ich Dich erinnert habe  :-)
Grüße
artem95vlasovets (2020-09-21 13:16:14+00:00): Hi Jakob48! The wikidata you restored does not apply to the localities where it is located. These wikidata applies to municipalities and districts, but not to these places. After your revert some places have the same wikidata (for example, "Zell an der Rot" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59864431), "Mettenberg"(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59864430), and Murrwangen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/293988320)
have the same wikidata (Q522526)). If you don't agree with me, please let me know. I will be happy to answer all your questions.  Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91065307
limes11 (2020-09-21 20:07:09+00:00): Nur zur Info: Das gesamte fragwuerdige CS wurde revertiert.
akalohri (2020-09-29 11:42:23+00:00): #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
chnav (2020-09-21 09:51:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, не надо было изменять размер здания №7, оно было нарисовано строго по размерам, а вы изменили на нечто кривое, не соответствующее спутниковому снимку, без единого прямого угла. Правка частично откачена, здания выпрямлены, лишние точки на контурах зданий удалены. Пожалуйста используйте горячие клавиши в редакторе для выпрямления зданий, кажется это клавиша Q, но могу ошибаться.
eggie (2020-09-17 20:13:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Meestal wordt de naam van een gebouw/ woning op de gebouwomtrek getagd. Dan zal de naam ook ook renderen op de kaart. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 21:12:44+00:00): De naam heb ik even op de gebouwomtrek gezet...
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-18 07:35:53+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Come mai hai cambiato il nome della fermata? Sul sito GTT viene riportato quello precedente: http://www.gtt.to.it/cms/percorari/extraurbano?view=palina&bacino=E&palina=27414&realtime=true&linea=4108 Inoltre, quando fai un commit, inserisci un commento significativo delle modifiche apportate. Mettere il pollice alzato non serve a niente. Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2020-09-17 20:16:15+00:00): Wanneer er geen parkeerplaats is kan deze uiteraard weg.
Gr eggie
karson_ (2020-09-18 00:16:08+00:00): What was the point of removing the roundabout here, it was already mapped correctly (other than it shouldn't be named). 

Certainly, the junction is not a mini-roundabout since it has an electric pole in the center, meaning it would be impossible to drive a vehicle straight across. Per the OSM definition of mini-roundabout, "A mini-roundabout is a special type of roundabout in which the middle can be traversed by vehicles".
Rootberg (2020-09-18 12:52:38+00:00): You are correct. This should be classified as a roundabout. Not a mini roundabout. I wanted to change this to a node as there is uncertainty as to what the street name should be for the roundabout. When I was there, it made me think that Ridgeland only went north, when in fact it also went south… Making it hard to find the TKE house. As I cannot 100% confirm that the roundabout street name should be Ridgeland, I made it a node. I have changed the tag from a mini-roundabout to a roundabout per the OSM wiki.
karson_ (2020-09-18 19:19:50+00:00): Fair enough. Seems like a confusing little area for the mailman.
Frans S (2020-10-23 14:57:05+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2020-09-17 20:17:39+00:00): Beste Rws,

Probeer de landuse los te houden van de wegen. Hier zit het vastgeplakt waar de parkeerplaats was.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91067399
eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 20:41:51+00:00): Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse forest.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 20:24:03+00:00): RWS,
Als lokale mapper zul je het vast wel weten. 
De voorgaande mapper geeft een  bron op die aangeeft dat het gebied Wolfheze heet.
Nu is natuurlijk de vraag waarom staat er Wolfheze op het bord?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=K_kCU8BFcUQgJ41OfzCjKw

Mapillery is een bron die we mogen gebruiken. Mapper Multimodaal heeft zelf de foto genomen.
Komt dit bekend voor?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-18 08:15:31+00:00): PB contact... Heet gebied heet inderdaad Reijerscamp
eggie (2020-09-18 08:47:02+00:00): Typo > Heet?? > Het gebied..  De oude rendering is hardnekkig. 
Even CTRL-F5 en F5
Cache leegmaken.. dan wordt je mutatie zichtbaar. 
Gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-17 21:42:24+00:00): Why was maxspeed removed from highway=track ways (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247268430)?
stefanct (2020-09-17 22:25:20+00:00): Because I was convinced that they were wrongly tagged due to the abandoned railway track "underneath" them. I deem it very unlikely that there is an actual speed limit of 70km/h on this dirt road (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Peterburgas-Var%C5%A1uva_netoli_Kabeli%C5%B3.JPG) when there are only a few other paved highways tagged with maxspeeds in the vicinity at all: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Y7K

However, I see now that the same user (a newbie) has tagged some other tracks with maxspeed=70 such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785504785
Apparently, I also missed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254646926 which is part of the abandoned railway.

I think that these are also wrong (and my removal correct). Thus I would contact that user now unless you can share some additional insights.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-18 04:45:39+00:00): I have talked with raceadmin live a number of times. He's adding info to fill this map: https://speed.openmap.lt They do a live checking of racing route beforehand and then update OpenStreetMap accordingly. maxspeed of 70 looks right. The only thing left from railway is an embankment.
stefanct (2020-09-18 11:42:23+00:00): Oh! Thank you very much for catching that. I should have been more careful, sorry. I have reverted the deletion of maxspeed on the 4 tracks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91108707

I am still a bit puzzled how speed limits work in Lithuania though. The English Wikipedia shows something that would be aligned with having a 70km/h limit on these kind of roads (gravel roads outside settlements): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_Lithuania
(which is a bit scary to me - even more so if they are used for racing :)

However, I was stupid enough to try to decipher the actual law that is referenced there with google translate. This is obviously not the best way to read legal texts (is there any? :) but as far as I can tell the 70km/h do not stem from this text. It mentions this number three times but not in the context of normal motorcars on gravel roads. There is only one speed limit for roads outside settlements no matter its surface and that's 90km/h.

So just out of curiosity I wonder where the 70km/h come from a) in Wikipedia, b) in these cases/in the real world. Do I read the law wrongly or is there another one or are there physical signs by the road? How is this handled in practice in general?

Thanks again!
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-18 19:32:54+00:00): 70kmh is an actual official limit for unpaved roads outside of built-up areas. The law makes no difference on types of "unpaved" so technically you can drive 70kmh on forest tracks ;-) Of course there is an "catch all" phrase of "according to safety situation". In practice I haven't seen or heard about anybody driving 70kmh on forest tracks, but that former railway is actually ok, it is straight and level.
stefanct (2020-09-18 20:01:01+00:00): No, that's my point: the 70km/h are not the official limit outside settlements - that's 90km/h and as you say they make no difference in that law between paved and unpaved. https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.BBE7D61A0416 under "XV. Važiavimo greitis" 175.1. So my guess would be that it is simply common practice to say 20km/h less makes the gravel roads safe enough "according to the situation" (being a gravel road). But are there traffic signs stating this explicitly or is this just thought to be "known" by everybody?
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-18 20:30:14+00:00): To my knowledge 70kmh IS the official limit. Although I haven't red/seen driving rules for ~25 years :-) And I never heard "20 less on gravel for safety" (on forest track's it can be unsafe to go 30kmh).
OK I googled and the first result (https://automokyklos.lt/ket/keliu-eismo-taisykles/vaziavimo-greitis) point 131.1 (and others) says that it is 90kmh on asphalt or concrete roads and everywhere else - 70kmh.
stefanct (2020-09-18 21:33:40+00:00): I see. There was some change of the law sometime and I am not able to navigate to the right page on the e-tar.lt page but now it makes sense, thank you. It would make sense to tag these things together with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed There is no tag in the wiki for this 70km/h rule. Maybe the Lithuanian mappers want to introduce something like source:maxspeed=LT:unpaved or similar. I just checked and there is exactly one way with that tag already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169238814

In any case my work of raising dust is complete I think ;) Sorry and thank you again for noticing my error.
SHARCRASH (2020-09-30 19:02:39+00:00): Hi

Hello! Please be careful to not cut other elements when cutting on a node like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/559488963/history Because you also cut the perimeter of the forest, which poses handling problems for the other contributors and complicates the reunification of the split perimeters. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44000597/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844627379/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844627375/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842229027/history
I see you are using the iD editor, so to prevent this from happening again, first select the node to cut, then while keeping shift pressed select the line to cut, finally cut with X. The shift+click function to select works with several elements, so the list of selected elements is displayed on the left, click the cross of one of the elements to deselect.
user_3961358 (2020-10-01 14:55:07+00:00): Hi,
Thank you very much for warning me before doing more damage! I should have known this from working with shift before.
If you find any other systematic errors or bad styles, feel free to notify me.
Reinhard12 (2020-09-20 06:51:44+00:00): Hallo GeoGladbecker,
das Schild steht an der Bonifaciusstr. Ecke Waldstr. (siehe mein CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84130865 )
Gruß Reinhard
Reinhard12 (2024-01-09 21:07:40+00:00): Im Sommer 2023 wurden die Schilder ersetzt - leider wieder durch Vz. 250 (+ Anlieger frei). Ich habe die Stadt Dorsten deswegen angeschrieben.
Reinhard12 (2024-02-04 15:03:19+00:00): Im Januar 2024 wurde das Vz 250 aufgrund meiner Anregung durch Vz 260 ersetzt.
GeoGladbecker (2024-02-04 16:37:34+00:00): Hallo Reinhard, wow, das ist ja super, vielen Dank für deinen Einsatz.

Beste Grüße
GG
Mike Raust (2020-09-23 11:21:44+00:00): Are you mapping for the specific maps.me renderer?
xmd5a (2020-09-26 16:19:56+00:00): No, my comment means that I tried to improve usually low quality data produced by maps.me editor
nitram1234 (2020-09-20 13:58:43+00:00): Just as a reminder for the next time, please dont make changes in distant geographic regions. It makes it more difficult for reviewers to see changes for the specific region that was changed. Does that make sense? If you have questions, please let me know. Cheers!
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:51:39+00:00): This changeset failed and was reverted.
hocu (2020-09-18 11:02:34+00:00): OSM katkilariniz icin tesekkurler. Cafenizin adi "Startup Cafe" mi yoksa "Startup Cafe Healthy Food & Networking 42 Maslak 🚀" mi? Websitenizden yola cikarak "Startup Cafe" olarabilecegini dusunuyorum. Eger boyleyse adini guncellemenizi ve ekstra bilgileri "Description" alanina yazmanizi oneririm. Her ne kadar serbestçe yazabilseniz de Mutfak/Cuisine için https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine adresindeki degerlerden size uygun olani kullanmanizi oneririm. Katkilarinizin devaminin gelmesi dilegiyle.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-06 23:59:20+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638281

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638282

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638283

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638284

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638285

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638286

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638287

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638288

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638289

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638290

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638291

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638293

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11638294

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:48:44+00:00): Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.

All tags were copied from the original.
datendelphin (2020-09-22 10:47:52+00:00): Hallo firefighter8915. Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe hier noch ein paar Fehler korrigiert: Du hast hier aus versehen beim Kindergarten das amenity=Kindergarten weggenommen, da braucht es aber, damit es als Kindergarten kategorisiert ist. Beim Briefkasten hast du die Leerungszeit ergänzt, diese Leerungszeiten oder allgemein öffnungszeiten brauchen aber ein sehr spezifisches Format, hier fehlte ein Doppelpunkt. ich hoffe diese Erklärungen helfen, beste Grüsse, Michael
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:48:17+00:00): Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.

All tags were copied from the original.
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:47:35+00:00): Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:47:55+00:00): All tags were copied from the original.
Omnific (2020-09-17 20:50:01+00:00): These were junk references to Daniel Boone National Forest with no relevance in the real world. All useful data was added to the new polygon.
opencarpatia (2020-09-18 14:02:36+00:00): Чому ти продовжуєш ігнорувати написану документацію про "Створення гарних описів наборів змін"? Твій changeset 91070597 замість опису є знову два беззмістовних слова "вніс правки", при тому що зміни стосуються 8-ми доріг та 15 нод. Що і чому тут було змінено? Ось ще раз посилання на документацію, прошу ознайомитись і прийняти до уваги: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD

Why you keep ignoring available documentation about "Good changeset comments"? Your Changeset 91070597, instead of description contains same two words "made changes", but actually 8 Ways and 15 nodes were affected. Here is the URL to the documentation, please read and consider: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
datendelphin (2020-09-22 10:48:18+00:00): Hier "Schnegg" scheint ein tippfehler zu sein. Und du hst das als name:de eingetragen, was dann aber zu name tag passen sollte, der Name ist ja auf deutsch. Schweizerdeutsch würde man mit name:gsw eintragen. Danke für deine Beiträge
GartenStuhl (2020-09-18 05:54:28+00:00): Der Test scheint nicht so erfolgreich gewesen zu sein.
Was wolltest du erreichen?

Falls es um die PV-Anlage ging könntest du dich hier kurz einlesen (englisch):
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/66234/solar-panels-on-houses
pio2_122 (2020-09-17 21:25:41+00:00): Dlaczego kontynuujesz dodawanie fake'owych POI jako prywatnych notatek?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91070909
opendcc (2021-04-29 10:52:01+00:00): Die Hausnummer 11 kommt doppelt vor.
jngt (2021-04-30 19:10:02+00:00): Korrekt, hatte ich leider nicht bemerkt. Ich habe es nun korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
eggie (2020-09-18 05:53:41+00:00): Beste duimdog..

Er zijn  al adresnodes aanwezig. Het is dus niet nodig om nog een keer een adres toe te voegen aan het gebouw zelf.
De dubbele adressen heb ik verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Friendly_Ghost (2020-09-17 23:04:21+00:00): Hoi emvee. Zijn de oneway(:bicycle)=no tags eigenlijk niet overbodig? Volgens mij worden die waarden namelijk aangenomen als je ze leeg laat.
emvee (2020-09-18 19:05:59+00:00): Ja zeker!

Meestal ruim ik die ook op maar hier vergeten.

Groeten,

Martin.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-09-18 20:19:43+00:00): Helemaal prima, Martin. Je kunt ze zelf opruimen, en anders doe ik het wel wanneer ik weer een edit in Bennekom maak.
emvee (2020-09-18 21:09:27+00:00): Ik was toch bezig, dus ik heb hem maar weg gehaald.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-09-18 21:21:39+00:00): Goed bezig. Fijn weekend gewenst
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-18 04:54:16+00:00): Darželiai, mokyklos etc. irgi yra residential zonos. Kitas dalykas, visi landuse turėtų bent minimaliai atitikti topologijos taisykles (t.y. būti tvarkingi, o ne chaotiškai subraižyti), nes priešingu atveju tokie duomenys bus visiškai nenaudingi kuriant žemėlapius.
PovilasDew (2020-09-19 11:27:38+00:00): Nu ok, jei pastatas apsuptas residential, tada apsimoka, nes amenity nėra landuse, bet jei teritorija ne residential, tada galima būtų panaudoti kitą landuse ir ant viršaus amenity.

Bėda su taisyklėmis, ypač kalbant apie mėgėjiškus žemėlapius tokius kaip OSM, kad kartais jos būna per daug neintuityvios. Suprantu, kai kalbam apie profesionalus žemėlapius, tada galima nustatyt griežtas taisykles, bet su mėgėjiškais žemėlapiais gali atsitikti įvairios situacijos, svarbu validuojant nebūtų klaidų. Jei pradėsim tokiose situacijose laikyt visus už pavadžio, tai visi paskui išsilakstys tiesiog, čia jau bendrai apie gyvenimą kalbu.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-19 13:41:36+00:00): Pati darželio/mokyklos/bažnyčios žemė iš principo yra landuse=residential (tuo galima įsitikinti pažiūrėjus į bet kokį žemėlapį).
OSM puikiai tinka ir yra naudojamas ne tik mėgėjiškoms duomenų vizualizacijoms (kaip kad www.openstreetmap.org), bet ir profesionaliems žemėlapiams. Nereikalaujama, kad visi suprastų ir laikytųsi griežtų taisyklių (geometrijos tikslumo, topologijos, hierarchijos), tam yra būrys prižiūrinčių, kurie praeina paskui ir sutvarko duomenis (tai darom jau gal 10 metų). (Kauno atveju aš buvau sutvarkęs, nežinau, kodėl prireikė išdraskyti). Ir tokia griežtos tvarkos prižiūrėjimo situacija yra ne mažiau kaip 5 metai, naudotojų tik daugėja, atsiranda net profesionalių GIS naudotojų (nes duomenys tampa panaudojami, o ne chaotiškai atmestinai pribraižytų geometrijų krūva), ir OSM duomenis vis daugiau naudoja realiuose gyvenimo taikymuose net ir komercinės kompanijos, kas liudija jų kokybę.