piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-12-21 13:13:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115101003
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:54:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9348919840/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Jan Wilts (2021-12-19 15:27:52+00:00): Hoi Bas,

Mag ik vragen waarom je hebt gekozen om dit secondary te maken? Vind dit een beetje een vreemde aanpassing aangezien de weg hier nog niet is overgegaan op een niet-autoweg, dat gebeurd pas bij de rotonde. Daarom zou ik zeggen dat de volledige afrit trunk_link zou moeten zijn, helemaal omdat de weg helemaal geen andere weg kruist.

Groet, Jan
85Bas (2021-12-22 17:11:49+00:00): Beste Jan,

Het is een kwestie van interpretatie denk ik. Naar mijn mening wijst alles erop dat het de bedoeling van de wegbeheerder is dat de afrit eindigt bij de scherpe bocht naar rechts. Daar staat een bord einde autoweg (dus niet pas bij de rotonde), een gebod rechts af te slaan, een kombord Groningen, en zelfs haaientanden. Het betreffende punt is volledig ingericht als t-splitsing; dat er van links geen verkeer kan komen doet daar in mijn ogen niets aan af. In lijn met de geldende praktijk op OSM eindigt daar dus de _link.

Bij N7 afrit 38 (zuidzijde) heeft de wegbeheerder een vergelijkbare kunstgreep toegepast.

Vriendelijke groet, 85Bas
jimmy_conway (2021-12-18 16:56:07+00:00): Nice!
YjM (2022-01-03 22:56:17+00:00): Dobrý den,

mohl bych prosím znát zdroj Vašich změn?

Děkuji
user_2061236 (2022-01-03 23:10:26+00:00): https://tenderarena.cz/dodavatel/seznam-profilu-zadavatelu/detail/Z0001901/zakazka/455088
YjM (2022-01-03 23:45:49+00:00): Děkuji!

Vidím v tom dva potenciální problémy.
a) Projekt nemusí vždy přesně odpovídat realizaci (stromky, jejich velikosti, trávníčky, ...)
b) (a to je mnohem důležitější) víte jistě, že zadávací dokumentace k veřejným zakázkám nepodléhá autorskému zákonu?
mariotomo (2021-12-19 12:56:51+00:00): hi, are you in the area at the moment?  do you think you could provide some on-the-ground data?  like shops, facilities, names, and drawing paths or walls if there are any.  and the most common routes of the "ferries" (lanchas taking you to the other island, or to the closest airport).  we have hardly any presence on the ground!
Noé G (2021-12-19 13:16:39+00:00): Hi! Sadly, I am not in the area. I only draw based on the imagery. I think it's not up-to-date, but I consider it can still be of some help for the people that know the area. If you think I am doing a messy job, stealing someone else job or anything, feel free to let me know. I can map somewhere else. I just went concerned by the situation of this community, forced to live in a very dense habitat cause of the sea level rising. Oh, and I am French, and my Spanish is maybe better than my English, if you want to switch language ;)
mariotomo (2021-12-19 14:51:50+00:00): myself Neapolitan and … por lo general cambio de idioma sin darme cuenta.  entiendo y aprecio el Francés, pero lo escribo muy mal.  como te dije, en el área casi no tenemos maperos y me parece muy útil que quieras mapear el área.
la gente del lugar vive en comunidades MUY densas, ni idea porqué.  quizás es su interpretación de reducir el impacto en el medio ambiente?  todas las comunidades indígenas de esta parte del Caribe vive en islas sin árboles, dejando incontaminada las selvas en los alrededores.
si te parece reconocer highway=path entre las casas, o puntos de embarque (node con amenity=ferry al final de una way marcada como man_made=pier y highway=path), estaría muy bien si quisieras añadirlos.
Noé G (2021-12-19 18:21:54+00:00): Gracias por las notas. Voy a ver. Punto de embarque, he visto a la vez, pero muchas veces parce puntes sin barco alrededor. De lo que entendí, parece que el nivel del agua subió en esa zona, reduciendo el terreno. Hay un documental en Youtube "Nativo Project" que muestra que son mayormente ancianos que siguen viviendo en esas islas y que el Gobierno prometió nuevas viviendas en el continente sin cumplirlo, desde años... Bueno, me parece que esas mapas no serán útil mucho tiempo con esos cambios posible, pero me parece raro ahora y interesante. Voy a seguir en esa zona un rato :)
mariotomo (2021-12-19 18:49:47+00:00): también te interesa añadir la extensión del coral reef?  es relevante para las rutas de ferry/lanchas, y significativa para el turismo.
Famlam (2021-12-18 17:00:39+00:00): En bron: BAG
DD1GJ (2021-12-18 20:39:46+00:00): Hallo Martin,
welcher Router funktionierte für welches Verkehrsmittel nicht? Die von Dir vorgenommene Änderung wird so auch keinen Erfolg bringen. Korrekt wäre es anzugeben, wer immer durchkommt, aslo z.B. foot=yes und bicycle=yes.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
MartinZ7 (2021-12-18 21:17:48+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
Danke gür den Hinweis. Wir werden morgen dort wandern gehen. Dann werde ich den Eintrag richtigstellen.
Gruß Martin
Badojo (2021-12-18 18:32:38+00:00): Hi, Podstrana isn't a single settlement anymore, it's a municipality that consists of separate settlements so it was tagged correctly. (https://www.podstrana.hr/uprava/statut-opcine-podstrana/) Please don't use only census as a source for settlements
Arisuaq (2021-12-19 19:27:38+00:00): Thanks, I haven't known about it, but I think Podstrana also should have separate tag. We'll see if these will be included into 2021 census.
Badojo (2021-12-19 19:33:35+00:00): No, problem. Podstrana tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1587405959) is currently tagged as place-municipality, which is the most appropriate even though it's not rendered. Also the settlements probably will be in the 2021 census since they were created back in 2016 (http://www.podstrana.hr/Broj-20-2016.pdf)
Karol_S (2021-12-19 09:33:46+00:00): Hej, dobra robota, dzięki za pomoc! Tylko tak sobie myślę, że do prywatnych altan i innych schronień warto, aby dodawać jeszcze access=private.
Leo Slager (2021-12-19 12:10:09+00:00): Dag jjasloot,
Helaas gaat dat met de editor iD altijd fout.
Editor iD kan niet omgaan met de routerelaties die dar over de sporen ligt. De nieuwe delen die je hebt toegevoegd komen altijd achteraan in de relatie terecht en dan is de route dus gebroken.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt gaan, dan adviseer ik je dringend om gebruik te maken van de editor JOSM.
https://westnordost.de/p/72496.jpg
De editor JOSM geeft je de mogelijkheid om relaties te bewerken en de wegen in de goede volgorde te plaatsen.
jjasloot (2021-12-19 17:53:21+00:00): Hey Leo, bedankt voor het oplossen, ik zal het zeker in mijn achterhoofd houden als ik ooit weer route relaties wil aanpassen!
MarcoR (2021-12-20 16:40:14+00:00): Ciao!
Non ho trovato errori nel tuo gruppo di modifiche. 

Ricordati che i tag di accesso (tipo horse=no) indicano la restrizione *legale* e non quanto sia consigliabile o meno intraprendere un sentiero con un certo mezzo/animale. Nel caso di horse=no in pratica significa che da qualche parte è presente il segnale di "divieto di circolazione ai cavalli". Per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access .

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115103944
ivanbranco (2021-12-20 17:06:14+00:00): Mi intrufolo per segnalare che i nomi utilizzati dai bikers vanno solo in mtb:name e non in name. Se un sentiero non ha un nome ufficiale (utilizzato da tutti, non solo dai biker) c'è noname=yes volendo.

Qua name=MTB Trial Difficile , Trial è un typo di Trail?
*Martin* (2021-12-21 18:52:20+00:00): Prisím dávajte zmysluplnejšie popisy zmien ako len "úpravy". Veď čo iné ako úpravy sa pri editácii riešia, že? ;-)

Ďalej prosím odstránte popisné meno z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968853927. Na objekty OSM nepatria popisné mená, ale iba vlastné, ak vôbec nejaké majú. Ináč sa každdy chodník bude volať "chodník" a každá budova bude mať nadpis "budova". Ďakujem.
aceman444 (2022-02-13 13:13:44+00:00): A podla coho na tu lesnu cestu smu bicykle? Bezne do lesa nesmu, ani po ceste. Aka je tam dopravna znacka?

Ten utvar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969819865 asi nie je cely branou, skor je to plot. Pekne, ze ste tam dali povolenia pristupu (aj ked divne, vsetko okrem koni, pritom to asi bude sukromna farma), ale to ste mali dat hlavne na branu a cesty vovnutri farmy, aby to malo prislusny ucinok. A je to teda farma/druzstvo alebo priemyselna zona?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 14:03:32+00:00): je to družstevná zona, ale aj farma, posnažím sa veci opraviť
Frans S (2021-12-19 14:19:46+00:00): Hello. 
Please improve your mapping skills. 
See my previous comments on your mappings on project 176
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115105361
pio2_122 (2021-12-18 19:30:52+00:00): Nie jestem przekonany co do landuse=residential na całym terenie - obejmuje on pola uprawne, cmentarz, parkingi, budynki radia, remizy, kościoła, itd. - nie są one bezpośrednio związane z przeznaczeniem tego tagu. Powinien być on używany tylko wokół budynków mieszkalnych.

Poza tym, wydaje mi się, że dla takiego kompleku wystarczający jest tag amenity=monastery razem z landuse=religious.
pio2_122 (2021-12-18 19:35:47+00:00): *drobne sprostowanie*: landuse=residential powinien być on używany na obszarach gdzie dominuje funkcja mieszkalna (wewnątrz takiego obszaru może być kilka małych firm, sklepów, itp.), nie ściśle wokół budynków mieszkalnych. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=pl

Tutaj dominuje jednak funkcja religijna.
Florek89 (2021-12-22 16:18:27+00:00): Przepraszam, że z opóźnieniem. Mogę Ci przyznać tutaj rację. Nie byłem do końca tego pewien właśnie. Usunę to w ciągu najbliższych dni (maksymalnie 2 tygodnie). Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi
Mike Baggaley (2021-12-23 09:38:50+00:00): HI, can you clarify why this public footpath has no access?

Thanks,
Mike
aceman444 (2022-02-13 12:41:47+00:00): Do znacky 'operator' sa pise nazov firmy/prevadzkovatela. Ak neviete kto to je, ale myslite si, ze sukromna firma, potom ste mali na mysli "operator:type=private" . A vypust nadrze nie je cela priehrada, takze znacenie  "waterway=dam" je uplne zle.
Ze je to 'vypust' ma byt vyjadrene  prislusnou znackou, nie nazvom. Do nazvu idu len vlastne mena objektov, napr. keby mala nadrz viac vypustov a tento sa volal "Vypust Fero".

A co su tie pristresky popri nadrzi? Pre rybarov, ci pre turistov, piknikove?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 14:52:14+00:00): prístrešky sú pre rybárov ale v podstate pre každého kto je v objekte
user_5359 (2021-12-20 13:51:04+00:00): Hello! Please use only the key wikipedia (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia). And the key wikipedia:ar=content and wikipedia=ar:content are duplicates!
Patr1k_P (2021-12-20 11:43:28+00:00): ahoj, to name tam nema byt, ze to je altanok je vyjadrene znackou..name pouzi ak je niekde oficialna tabula a ma to oficialne meno

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9349267467
VictorIE (2023-08-06 10:57:53+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013367184

name="U Hansfield" seems exotic. :)
mackerski (2023-08-06 11:16:26+00:00): It's an odd name, but it's real: https://www.ubyurbeo.com/finding-your-home/u-hansfield

At least they didn't call it "Ur Hansfield"
Pisto81 (2024-03-09 13:54:10+00:00): It is an well organized urban for sure as the map depicts.
Truchin (2022-01-05 15:38:50+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu

D'après Wikipédia, la ligne doit ouvrir en juin 2022. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_13_Express_du_tramway_d'%C3%8Ele-de-France
Y aurait il une erreur sur wikipedia ?
Qui est est important pour les stations, c'est d'indiquer quand elles sont ouvertes au trafic voyageur, ce qui ne semble pas encore être le cas, même si les essais de matériel ont démarré.
Donc OK pour les rails, mais KO pour les stations et la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10041578

Bonne continuation

Thomas
_Mathieu_ (2022-01-05 15:43:39+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,

A priori je n'ai pas touché aux stations, et la relation indique bien opening_date=2022-06

Le opening_date=2021 des stations est ancien et correspond à une ancienne date annoncée, je n'y ai pas touché mais je vais voir si je peux le rectifier :)

Mathieu
Truchin (2022-01-05 17:00:05+00:00): Ah oui effectivement, il y avait des stations taguées comme si elles étaient opérationnelles. Donc il y aurait des modifis à faire sur le plupart des arrêts en attendant l'ouverture :)
_Mathieu_ (2022-01-05 17:12:58+00:00): Je me fais avoir à chaque fois entre les deux :
- opening_date est pour une date estimée d'ouverture, dans le futur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date
- start_date est pour la date réelle d'ouverture, dans le passé https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
Donc ici il faut "juste" mettre à jour les opening_date avec la nouvelle estimation (été 2022)
Vinber (2021-12-20 07:41:18+00:00): salut,
dans le commentaire peut-être ajouté de quel tag à quel tag !
Si je comprend tu as surtout fait du landuse=school -> landuse=education ?

My2cents mais tout d'abord grand merci
gendy54 (2021-12-20 09:21:12+00:00): C'est tout à fait ca monsieur ;)
tenzul (2021-12-19 00:29:04+00:00): An der Haltebucht steht ein riesiges Informationsschild zur Region. Wanderkarte oder sowas. Wahrscheinlich war das gemeint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106194
marczoutendijk (2021-12-19 10:52:10+00:00): Der ursprüngliche Mapper setzte dort natural=information ein (vor 6 Jahren), aber das ist kein gültiges Tag. Ich denke, tourism=information ist besser.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-19 14:56:16+00:00): Corrected:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115128665
mariotomo (2021-12-19 12:58:57+00:00): if you wish to contact the local community while in the area, find us at https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama or https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
Lee Carré (2021-12-18 19:10:45+00:00): Due for conversion into residential (likely apartments).
wille (2021-12-20 20:15:40+00:00): Olá, Carlos

Você mapeou algumas lagoas em áreas que nenhuma imagem de satélite mostra nenhum elemento de água. Qual a fonte dos dados?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106454
Carlos Eduardo RJ (2021-12-20 20:38:46+00:00): Prezado Wille,

A Canoa de Tolda respondeu aos teus questionamentos sobre a existência das lagoas. Que, existem, mas sem água. Por isso é indispensável o conhecimento local para entender a degradação de ocupações e usos irregulares. Como foi dito o objetivo do projeto é a reinserção das lagoas na cartografia oficial que erradicou as lagoas o que possibilita colocações equivodadas de sua "não existência".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106454
aceman444 (2022-02-13 13:23:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1168629436 , railway=railway_crossing je krizenie kolajnic, nie krizenie cesty a kolajnic. Ma to byt level_crossing.

Poprosim Vas, aby ste ako zaciatocnik neriesili chyby hlasene na Keepright, ci Osmose. Neviete ich este posudit.

Tie vsetky brody v lese ste videli?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 13:56:42+00:00): asi tak 90% brodov áno, ja už zásahy do máp robiť nebudem
aceman444 (2022-02-13 20:35:31+00:00): Ani jeden z tych chodnikov, co ste oznacili footway=sidewalk nebol postrannym chodnikom popri ceste. Pozor na to.
JeroenHoek (2021-12-18 21:36:55+00:00): 'Swingma Parc'? Met een 'c' natuurlijk… Ik vond 'Vondel Parck' al pretentieus. :)
E de Wit (2021-12-18 23:27:52+00:00): Hopelijk beklijft deze naam niet...

Woningen worden wel in een park-(met een k)-setting geplaatst waar men niet bij het huis kan parkeren en tussen de woningen door loopt.
eggie (2021-12-18 20:33:46+00:00): Dag Mro  Je vraagt feedback..
Wanneer dat gebouw de plek is van de stichting dan is het uiteraard oke.
Op het oostelijke gebouw staat overigens ook adresnode 6.
MVG
eggie
Mro95 (2021-12-18 20:39:48+00:00): Hallo eggie,
Ja dit is de nieuwe plek van de stichting. adresnode blijft hetzelfde.

mvg,
mro95
MarcoR (2021-12-20 16:52:10+00:00): Ciao!
Ho controllato il tuo gruppo di modifiche e non ho trovato errori.
Ricorda di non attaccare insieme oggetti che nella realtà non sono collegati tra loro (in questo caso un albero con l'area residenziale). Spesso è solo un fatto di stile pensato per evitare di complicare troppo le cose ai mappatori che verranno dopo, ma in qualche caso potrebbe trattarsi di un errore (ad es. strade attaccate a corsi d'acqua o a edifici).

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106621
aceman444 (2022-12-26 21:09:39+00:00): Zdravim, podla systemu Slovenskej spravy ciest, k zeleznicnym staniciam vzdy ide cesta aspon 3. triedy. Nebol teda dovod cestu 3880 menit, je vyznamna z uvedeneho dovodu.
Pri cestach 3759 a 3790, ktore ste "degradovali" je to povedzme OK, uz nemaju svoj vyznam a nevedu ku stanici. Tam som ponechal nizsiu triedu len doplnil chybajuce ssc:class=tertiary, aby sme vedeli, ze sa to zamerne od SSC lisi.
EneaSuper (2021-12-19 11:41:06+00:00): Ciao, ho controllato le tue modifiche e non sono d'accordo per quanto riguarda i giochi per i bambini, in quanto i tag che avevo adoperato io erano più corretti e specifici.
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 11:58:44+00:00): Ciao Enea, hai ragione tu, l'aggiunta di leisure=playground è errata, grazie per la segnalazione, correggo quando torno a casa. Ma name=Scivolo é un nome descrittivo. È come se aggiungessimo name=Panchina alle amenity=bench
EneaSuper (2021-12-19 12:14:25+00:00): Tranquillo, fai con calma.

Per quanto riguarda le denominazioni credo che qui a Genova si faccia così, ma è da molto che la cosa non viene discussa.

Inoltre San Quirico è uno dei vari quartieri della Val Polcevera che, di conseguenza, rientra in questo progetto: https://verdecomune.opengenova.org/

È da lì che decidemmo di denominare gli elementi in quel modo.
Tomas Straupis (2021-12-19 07:40:35+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. Viskas gerai, tik griovys yra ditch, o ne drain. Drain Lietuvoje yra tik kelios trumpos atkarpos prie užtvankų.
PauliusV (2021-12-19 10:45:42+00:00): Ačiū, dabar žinosiu.
Akkurator (2022-02-17 00:00:24+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

du hast hier den Hirchgraben al "access=private" getaggt.
Auf welcher Grundlage?
Das ist nach Westen Anlieger frei.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate
Dass "Anlieger frei" nicht "private" ist, hat man dir schon zig mal erklärt, deine beharrliche Ignoranz diesbezüglich ist wirklich bemerkenswert.

Der Einbahnstraßencharakter für Anlieger ist auch nicht getaggt.

Und warum highway=service? Das ist kein Zufahrtsweg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice 

Ich würde das ja gerne korrigieren gemäß Beschilderung und wiki, fürchte aber, dass es durch dich heimlich wieder nach deinem Gusto überbügelt wird - wie schon so oft.

Frustrierte Grüße,
Akkurator.

PS: Radverkehr noch gar nicht berücksichtigt...
PT-53 (2022-02-17 06:37:52+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
siehe hierzu auch diese CS-Diskussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113793087
Grüße
Mashin (2021-12-18 21:16:51+00:00): Hi zachesch202,
there is an ongoing project for (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jnighan/Connecticut_Highway_Classification_Proposal)[CT road classification].
Before you do more edits to road classification, please talk to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jnighan)[jnighan] or join #local-connecticut on (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/)[Slack].
Josef73 (2026-03-27 20:32:46+00:00): Was ist der unterschied zwischen den Linien ALDI Süd (167450494), v9 Weg: Aldi Süd (1013378122) ?
Marek-M (2021-12-18 20:42:23+00:00): W changeset napisałem o uproszczeniu skrzyżowania we Fromborku ale miałem na myśli skrzyżowanie w Tolkmicku
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115107258
Shaun das Schaf (2022-06-04 09:31:52+00:00): Hi kfrah,

du hast hier einige Loipen als Linie eingetragen, die bereits als Relation vorhanden sind. Somit sind diese Loipen jetzt doppelt vorhanden.

Ein paar Beispiele:
Landhalden Loipe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3496277 = https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013378154

Rechberg Loipe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2781488 = https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013471141

Oren-Loipe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2781487 = https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013378151

Was das versehentlich oder hat das einen anderen Grund?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
TomPar (2021-12-19 01:20:59+00:00): Hello.  You applied the "barrier=boulders" tag to the whole way and removed "highway=track".  The interpretation of this would be the whole way is a long line of boulders.  I suspect you meant to indicate that there are boulders at the beginning and/or end of the track to block vehicle access?  If so, then the barrier tag would be just applied to the node at the beginning and/or end.  Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.
madiener (2021-12-19 01:28:00+00:00): I'm not that experienced. I just meant to indicate there are boulders (2 of them) just north of the stream blocking the road, which may not be wide enough for a car at that point anyway. Google Maps thinks you can drive through. I did not mean to change that highway/track part.
TomPar (2021-12-19 01:44:26+00:00): Thanks for the quick response.  No biggie.  I just updated that track per your note.  FYI, changing here will probably NOT update Google Maps' routing feature.  But glad to have the added detail in OSM.  Thanks.
madiener (2021-12-19 01:48:09+00:00): Google note was FYI. I reported it there too.
user_5359 (2022-01-05 19:30:01+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key  name:en-x-t-zh (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8294243822/history)?
rene78 (2021-12-18 23:52:43+00:00): Werde noch 1-2 Tage brauchen, um alles einzuarbeiten.
felipeeugenio (2022-01-12 22:20:23+00:00): Hola Gustavo.
Un mapero con cuenta recien creada borró este humedal (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116068233) argumentando una resolución ministerial.
Lo que el ministerio decida no altera lo que hay en terreno por lo que tus ediciones no deberían haber sido borradas. A lo más cambia el nombre que le diste.
Te ruego por favor verificar. Mientras tanto voy a reversar el cambio.

saludos
GustavoE (2022-01-13 16:13:09+00:00): Hola Felipe, acabo de verificar y estás en lo correcto. Las ediciones ya fueron corregidas para quedar tal como deberían independiente de las definiciones y deslindes oficiales del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente relativas a humedales urbanos
felipeeugenio (2022-01-13 18:20:59+00:00): buenisimo. gracias. saludos
user_5359 (2021-12-19 08:01:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.osm.org.

Please look also on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch