piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fititnt (2023-06-13 23:34:02+00:00): Eu também descobri que CNES "8028" deve ter explicitamente "0008028" como você tem colocado.

São poucos, mas todos os que eu editei até agora que tinham menos casas cortaram o zero.

Aliás, sobre opening_hours=*, assim como healthcare:speciality=* (que o Qualhado comentou) eu ainda não consegui gerar ainda do dump <ftp://ftp.datasus.gov.br/cnes/BASE_DE_DADOS_CNES_202304.ZIP> (não abre no navegador, precisa de programa de FTP ou SSH). Vi agora que saiu o 202305 (é mensal, com certo delay) mas em teoria ali tem tudo.

Mas assim, em teoria, tem como ter sugestão melhorada de quais tags usar em vez do https://cnes.datasus.gov.br/pages/estabelecimentos/consulta.jsp que é mais manual.  Outra coisa é que pelo site do Datasus, ele não permite procurar por nome de rua ou número de casa, dai estou usando busca por endereço em vez do nome. Não é perfeito, mas dá uma ajudada.

Mas assim, por os ref do datasus + CNPJ ainda é manual (talvez atualizações de para sugerir melhor) porque as vezes o próprio Datasus pode precisar de atualização.
AjBelnuovo (2023-06-13 23:52:46+00:00): Ao olhar o site da prefeitura de Cotia , a UBS do Portão está funcionando ( https://cotia.sp.gov.br/servicos-de-saude/ ) . Preciso confirmar .
AjBelnuovo (2023-06-13 23:55:22+00:00): A minha dúvida : foi criada uma ref para o CNES ? E ela é encontrada na busca do OSM ?
literan (2022-03-07 11:52:17+00:00): я исправил на shop=convenience - верно?
вы поставили shop=con
neo-plan (2022-03-07 12:04:11+00:00): Да, недоглядел. Спасибо!
kwiatek_123 (2023-09-23 22:59:24+00:00): Czemu to drzewo jest atrakcją i ma adres? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2090215833
Msiipola (2022-03-21 18:17:24+00:00): Det finns ett omärkt område väster om Coop (id: 137454132) skapad av dig. Vänligen sätt taggar på det.
UKChris (2022-05-08 10:53:46+00:00): Hi John,

Just a heads up that for Rossiter Road, it seems the odds are "TA2 8SS", but the evens are "TA2 8SN"

ref: https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/TA/TA2/8/
John Grubb (2022-05-08 15:05:39+00:00): Ta. Sorted.
tonyf1 (2022-11-01 10:53:30+00:00): Hi, could you please give a link or GPS for the sign you saw? I have found https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.0198354&lng=145.2980154&z=17&pKey=463720531384332&focus=photo&x=0.28994845932415925&y=0.7015664068221198&zoom=2.0107238605898123 which indicates it is shared from Magid east.
tonyf1 (2022-11-02 09:00:20+00:00): Yes  HighRouleur, the last sign entering from either side is an end shared path. Mapillary was out of date. I have uploaded new Mapillary, available soon.
user_5239402 (2022-03-07 08:29:41+00:00): Hello Mapy_korean. Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “123” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
Michoo (2022-03-06 21:15:35+00:00): Why did you move the node to the middle of the meadow? I reverted this changeset due to vandalism.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-13 15:37:44+00:00): aqi voce deletou uma area que  delimitava uma area chamada Bairro Seco e não colocou nada que indetificasse o mesmo
alexprestestv (2022-07-04 02:55:00+00:00): o bairro seco prescisa ser analizado e redesenhado, eu deletei pois as delimitações estavam muito errados!
ivanbranco (2022-03-06 15:52:25+00:00): Hi Chetan,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dshop

amenity=shop is deprecated, please don't use it anymore. Also please add a meaningful changeset comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Matt McCutchen (2022-03-06 03:55:22+00:00): News articles:
- https://montgomeryplanning.org/montgomery-county-planning-board-approves-resolution-to-rename-montrose-parkway-in-honor-of-renowned-local-abolitionist-the-rev-josiah-henson/
- https://www.mymcmedia.org/montrose-parkway-becomes-josiah-henson-parkway-on-friday/

I noticed the updated signs today at the intersections with East Jefferson Street and Towne Road.  I didn't take the extra time to confirm the signs along the full length of the road.  But I'll hazard a guess that it's least confusing to rename the whole road on OSM at the same time (including the "proposed" part even though I'm unsure of its latest status) and it's valuable to get the change out ASAP even if some signs are not updated yet.
archpdx (2022-03-06 04:07:10+00:00): Thanks for catching this! I've fixed the spelling for WES here so it won't suggest to change it back:
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/commit/1cf0ccc57f2378024175cf74d9595dd43fe649db
ElliottPlack (2022-03-18 04:36:08+00:00): Solid work all around here! One minor correction and something to note about bridges. In this changeset you'd changed the Charmuth Road bridge to a surface road and marked the stream as a culvert. This could be a subjective thing but we just finished a project with Baltimore County to map all of their bridges with their references, so if you see a way with a bridge:ref field, it should remain a bridge, even if it doesn't really feel like a bridge on the ground. The sidewalk can be separate bridge sections adjacent. Under Maryland law, any culvert larger than 60 inches (5 feet) in diameter is no longer a "culvert" but rather a "structure". Structures have to be inspected and are rated according to their structural integrity. Many of them have posted weight limits. In the case of Charmuth, the county has not measured a max weight, according to their records, but they do treat it as a bridge.

Bridge mapping in OSM is a little odd with sidewalks as the sidewalks have to be parallel bridges. Some folks map the bridge deck separately to show the continuity, which can be useful. There are some of them well mapped on the beltway.

Cheers!
mariotomo (2022-05-19 00:14:41+00:00): hola. veo que estás describiendo retornos en la Panamericana utilizando los `turn:lanes`, y me alegro. también veo que utilizas restricciones de giro. quieres volverlo a considerar? debería ser posible evitarlas. tengo ejemplos en que no las puse. si acaso hablamos. no voy a cambiar lo que hiciste, pues me parece muy bien, sólo te comenté pues pienso se pueda hacer lo mismo con menos trabajo.
JLOSM (2022-05-19 22:02:49+00:00): Hola, las ediciones que mencionaste, básicamente las cuadraba en 	https://mapwith.ai/rapid tocando el nodo de intersección con la calzada en sentido contrario, en el cual le colocaba restricción de giro, (haciendo click en la imagen del lateral izquierdo de pantalla, lo cual automáticamente produce una relación) para que continuara hasta cruzar dicha intersección y la retomara mas adelante. Hacer esto, personalmente me parece que es muy sencillo y rápido, utilizando la herramienta mencionada.
Actualmente observo que ya editó algunos de sitios y en caso de que desees continuar puedes mirar en este estas coordenadas 8.4029738, -82.2853561.

Saludos desde Colombia, país en donde observo que también tienes trazas GPS.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:10:06+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
AgusQui (2022-03-16 22:29:39+00:00): La extensión del Metrobus del Bajo está en construcción, no está terminado, por lo que debería estar mapeado como highway=construction como estaba antes
drivec (2022-05-11 02:10:02+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
user_5359 (2022-03-07 17:24:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I reverted you change set because you mixed to business in one building. Also you use the wrong keys. If there are two business in the building, don't edit the building. Create two nodes inside of the building and add the business Information there.

If you need help you are welcome!
ivanatora (2022-03-07 07:31:47+00:00): Може ли да върнеш пътя обратно с access=no
Евентуално и да очертаеш военните с military=danger_area
Няма файда просто да изтриваш пътя, а и не се прави така. Утре някой ще го начертае отново, или направо ще ти revert-не changeset-а.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:38:07+00:00): Пътя е върнат с access=no в промяна 118779371
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-30 09:49:14+00:00): Note that name should not contain descriptive name such as "Tree"

that is expressed by marking it as tree with natural=tree tag
muzirian (2022-03-07 10:27:44+00:00): nice work
zstadler (2022-04-11 10:54:12+00:00): Hello jgreenhow,

Thank you fro your contribution to OSM.

In this edit you have changed the boundaries of 3 neighborhoods in Haifa by moving node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1458402531

The node is unrelated to the beach you have mapped.

In the future, please pay attention to unintended changes.

The node move was reverted in changeset 119572884
GinaroZ (2022-05-04 23:04:21+00:00): These changes around the A199/A1 have been reverted as there no access restrictions here.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-06 12:34:12+00:00): 1. `place=` should be located in the sociocultural center, not the etymology of `natural=` . Please respect One Feature One Object. 
2. Shel Lei Tau has nothing to do  as Shek Lei Estate.
philippec (2022-03-06 11:45:06+00:00): Mechelen keerlus bussen.
Mapillary heeft vertraging, ik was eerst.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-06 12:36:47+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-06 14:52:52+00:00): Ciao Mauro. Occhio che queste http://rete.comuni-italiani.it/foto/2008/71424/view non sono amenity=fountain ma amenity=driking_water. Le amenity=fountain sono fontane ornamentali decorative come https://www.flickr.com/photos/ikimuled/48011379411/ Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118149045
Kovoschiz (2022-03-06 12:35:11+00:00): Please don't attach irrelevant objects on areas.
loir (2022-03-10 06:17:07+00:00): Вы направление одностороннего движения перепутали, там заезд, а не выезд.
loir (2022-03-10 06:19:01+00:00): и геометрия заезда-выезда не такая: заехав со стороны скорой помощи напрямую к выезду не попадёшь, уберу эту линию.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-12-25 07:31:56+00:00): Hi Mappermap372,
I saw that you have changed several road names to Clonakilty Relief Road. Is there some official document that can confirm change of the street names, since on official paper these roads have different names https://clonakiltyfrs.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/20141209-MMD-332149-N-DR-00-XX-0015-P2_EXHIBITIONCOPY.pdf
woodpeck (2022-03-21 11:40:29+00:00): Can you point to any source for the boundary between Ingniqhiurvik and Ingilraniq (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037497356) or have you made that up? Also, since you have been editing the coastline, have you done any research into why the boundary of "Inuvialuit Lands" follows the coastline loosely but not precisely - is that intentional? Is it really the case that some parts of Ingniqhiurvik are inside, and some outside, the Inuvialuit Lands?
DENelson83 (2022-03-21 15:24:46+00:00): Ingilraniq is a strait, meant to be the entrance into Ingniqhiurvik, which is why I gave those two bodies of seawater those specific area definitions.

And the Inuvialuit Lands are meant to coincide with the coastline here.  I only gave some of those ways the "natural=coastline" tag where they were more accurate than the data sourced from PGS.
eggie (2022-03-06 17:44:47+00:00): Hi Eduardo.. I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
mgpx (2022-03-06 21:57:10+00:00): Biztos vagy abban, hogy a Csepegő-kői barlang, ill. a Kurta-bérci-sziklaüreg ugyanaz ? Számos forrás ezt két külön sziklahasadékként említi, pl. http://nonkarstic.elte.hu/f_borzs_list.html
rubasov (2022-03-07 05:31:03+00:00): Nem vagyok biztos benne, a linkelt forrásod elbizonytalanított. Jártam már a közelükben, de a nehéz terepen nem sikerült még megtalálnom, hogyan kell az utolsó 50-100 métert megtenni. Én ebből a forrásból gondoltam, hogy a két név ugyanazé a barlangé:

https://termeszetvedelem.hu/talalati-oldal/?type=orszagos-barlangnyilvantartas&id=5210-43

De az ELTE-s linken lévő fotó nem ugyanazt a barlangot mutatja. Úgyhogy mindjárt le is veszem a Kurta-bérci nevet róla.
mgpx (2022-03-07 08:14:26+00:00): Közvetlenül a Felső-réttől északra van egy északnyugat-délkelet tájolású kisebb mellékgerinc, annak a gerincét követve a legkönnyebb feljutni. 

Én korábban csak a Csepegő-kői barlangot találtam meg, de tervezek még visszamenni kicsit jobban szétnézni. Ez a térképrészlet is két különböző barlangként mutatja:
https://cdn.nwmgroups.hu/s/img/i/1901/20190123kamor5.jpg?w=800&h=800&t=5
rubasov (2022-03-07 11:13:58+00:00): Legutóbb, amikor ott jártam, a Kurta-bércről próbálkoztam (a legalsó sziklaleszakadás fölött, körülbelül a fokozottan védett terület határán). A gerinc és a barlang közötti szakasz nekem zavaróan meredek volt. Vadcsapások ugyan vezettek át rajta, de nem volt kedvem arra menni. Fentről néztem is azt a rövid kis névtelen mellékgerincet. Jó tudni, hogy onnan egyszerűbb. Köszönöm szépen!
rubasov (2022-03-07 11:28:23+00:00): És ha jól olvasom a linkelt térképrészletet, a Kurta-bérci üreg megközelítéséhez lehet hogy jó úton voltam, csak nem tudtam róla, hogy két barlangot is érdemes keresni. A gerinc können járható volt. Kellett volna még fölfele menni pár tíz métert és ott alaposan körülnézni.
djakk (2022-03-19 16:52:15+00:00): Salut ! Je vois que tu as mis l'itinéraire Rue de Plélo + Rue du Vieux Cours en "residential", or c'est l'itinéraire pour faire Rue d'Isly -> Place de Bretagne via le boulevard de la Liberté (il est interdit de tourner à gauche au carrefour rue d'Isly x boulevard de la Liberté en provenance de la rue d'Isly). C'est pour ça que je l'avais mis en "secondary". À moins que ça ait changé récemment ? @+ djakk
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-03-19 17:33:09+00:00): Salut, j'avais pas noté ça mais pour moi cette voirie est à classer en "residential" au vu de ses aménagements (zone 30 + interdiction PL en transit) même si elle permet de contourner cette interdiction.
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-03-19 17:35:59+00:00): De même, au vu des aménagements devant la gare et sur l'avenue Janvier, c'est le boulevard Magenta qui devrait être en tag "secondary" sur toute sa longueur et l'avenue en "residential".
djakk (2022-03-22 16:34:04+00:00): Oui tu as raison pour Magenta + avenue Janvier ! 
Pour l'itinéraire rue de Plélo + rue du Vieux Cours, il est certes limité à 30 km/h, et biscornu, mais à cause de son trafic ça n'est pas calme comme on pourrait s'attendre avec un highway="residential" …
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-03-22 16:37:27+00:00): Salut,

Je te crois volontiers, tu connais le terrain contrairement à moi, je demande juste à voir ce qu'en pensent les autres contributeurs rennais.
catdreamer (2022-03-19 13:35:29+00:00): 因為有三角點而硬要標一個peak要適可而止，太氾濫了
SekeRob (2022-03-06 09:28:57+00:00): Hi,

On "removed ref:mise from 1 fuel_station". Every fuel station must have one. The particular one where you removed the MISE has been subject of discussion, used by several stations. The Register only lists it for 1 set of coordinates.

ciao
MarcoR (2022-03-06 10:35:26+00:00): Hi,
I don't like removing tags added by other mappers but in this case I did it because I couldn't find that reference number in the MISE opendata. Maybe the fuel station is still there, but neither MISE opendata mentions it nor it contains the "46095" reference number anywhere.

Using the latest MISE opendata as source, I've created an uMap showing the fuel stations of Chieti, Pescara, l'Aquila and Teramo with name, operator and ref:mise : https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/distributori-carburante-in-abruzzo_726539

I can't go there and verify it so if you have a better understanding of the place feel free to correct my change and sorry for the bother.

Happy mapping,
Marco.
SekeRob (2022-03-06 14:36:05+00:00): Exactly why you should only have added a fixme. I pass all of these stations dozens of times annualy, particularly the Coppa one, been there at least 10 years and only sells diesel and 95. In that, the station you added the MISE in separate CS requires fuel type tags and MISE source ref. You can take lead from the stations you 'updated'
You will find more stations with odd/conflicting info here, a big tax fraud came to light last year or the year before in this area by carburanti operators. 17 million IIRC. Q8 on Enzo Ferrari also operates on another station's license and is no listed in the MISE, at least the last time i rechecked, just few hundred meters from the municipal Police head office, lol. The operator refused to give me the number after explaining what its used in. 
Dont lose info, move it to notes or old_ref. New license, store the old one on the old_ref key. 

Cheers
SekeRob (2022-03-06 15:11:38+00:00): PS Thanks for that link to the umap, extracting the tar from the website, converting and importing into an office table is a pain. If this is auto update it's be super.

Cheers
SekeRob (2022-03-07 12:44:12+00:00): Hi Marco, 
Just curious, is there some MISE challenge going? Low and behold another one arrived and hit on one of the stations in the same area. Before and after are same tags and values. Personally, unless one knows the area, local knowledge,  one should consult the local who last edited the item when there's an issue. One guy always consults me on local conflict issues.
The mentioned Q8 has no pin in your report, neither Coppa, yet they're in full swing. The Q8 was another brand before that and shut for about a year, before I took up mapping actively, and when reopened had a 'nuove gestione' in the window, but 1.5 years not showing up in the register is beyond me. Even the Q8 website makes mention of the location so the tax man must be throuroughly asleep or it's an accepted fact that multiple stations can run on the same license which is certainly the case with the 2 of NTC.

Anyway, I've long unticked the gas station boxes on Osmose, but, if someone makes a change and a tag is wrong/missing all those who touched the object get it listed in their Osmose report. Yours: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/MarcoR a good 2000 level 1/2/3 . I work my list down daily. 5 are irreperable. Everytime I fix them the 'owner' just reverses them (lines without any tags), so I let them be until I get tired of this and take it up with the DataWorkGroup (DWG). That location alone has thousands of issues and everyone in OSM seems to be okay with that which gives me to think at times how                                                    earnest they really are about data QA.

ciao
Rob
MarcoR (2022-03-07 14:42:34+00:00): Hi Rob,
in my case, another mapper mentioned the problem of duplicate ref:mise values on the Telegram group of the Italian community so I started investigating the issue; I'm not aware of any organized edits.

From time to time, I try to fix some of my issues reported by Osmose/OSM Inspector but the truth is that I generally don't know how to fix them without worsening the database or solving them would require me to travel too many miles. I hope to lower their amount in the near future ;)

P.S. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/distributori-carburante-in-abruzzo_726539 should be now automatically updated on a daily basis.

Have a nice day,
Marco.
SekeRob (2022-03-09 12:07:13+00:00): Hi Marco

Your umap link seems the same as before but noticed now fuel pump icon on the pins. Many thanks for that. See at least 3 stations missing on just one cycle route. Ludicrously poor data quality at the Ministero dello 'Sviluppo' E. Had not realized there's serious blank zones in the region. With 2.12 per liter just going to a station and back costs 5 Euro /o\

ciao
MarcoR (2022-03-09 18:56:57+00:00): Hi Rob!
You are welcome ;)
The data comes from "Ministero dello sviluppo economico" but AFAIK every entry is filled by the fuel stations operators; I don't think that MISE checks or sanitize that data before exporting it (sometimes the CSV file is broken due fields containing newline characters or an odd number of double quotes). Local knowledge in this case, as in many other occasions, helps a lot.

Regards,
Marco.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
george1201 (2022-06-26 22:22:05+00:00): Der "Stummel" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037501101 sieht nicht so schön aus. Entweder man bindet ihn an die Hardeckstraße an oder man entfernt ihn. Was meinst du?
Karthoo (2022-06-27 05:53:02+00:00): Kann man entfernen. Der ist wohl durch das Auftrennen eines Weges entstanden.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-07 20:21:10+00:00): Is this the name of the person living there?
Konkon153 (2022-03-06 09:32:34+00:00): [ und damit alle 142 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Werder vollständig angepasst ]
Duja (2022-03-11 14:32:34+00:00): Mapiranje ovako velikih područja s nejasnim granicama je u najmanju ruku kontroverzno. Narušava princip proverljivosti (verifiability) , a mnogi smatraju i da je out of scope.
gmar5 (2022-03-10 18:18:34+00:00): Ciao. Potresti fornire una fonte su dove è stato raggiunto consenso su questo criterio?
Grazie.
Fra00 (2022-03-10 19:13:03+00:00): Definizione di "city" (criterio specifico per l'Italia): Centri abitati con almeno 100 mila abitanti. Eccezioni: capoluoghi di regione; capoluoghi di provincia con almeno 50 mila abitanti (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place).
Come puoi vedere, in tutta Italia è il criterio usato, almeno prima che tre mesi fa un utente decidesse unilateralmente di modificare l'assetto stabilito. Se poi si fa un confronto a livello internazionale (basta vedere la vicina Francia), questo è impietoso per quante presunte "city" abbiamo in Italia.
gmar5 (2022-03-10 19:59:15+00:00): Grazie per la risposta. Ero curioso di sapere se vi fosse stata una discussione più approfondita sul caso (purtroppo non seguo i luoghi di discussione italiani). Un criterio così meccanico, senza relazione al luogo, può essere in contrasto con altri principi della mappa.

Dalla più generica wiki internazionale (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dcity#place.3Dcity_vs_place.3Dtown):

> In some regions, the population of settlements is used to differentiate place=town and place=city, but this practice varies between countries. In sparsely populated regions, many settlements tagged place=city are less populous than in regions with high population density. 

Questo si potrebbe applicare alle province italiane di montagna, dove questi centri abitati (chiamati localmente città, per distinguerli dai paesi) hanno una rilevanza ben maggiore rispetto a ben più popolose "town" della periferia di Milano, per fare un esempio.

> As of mid 2019, 63% of place=city have a population=* tag, of which the median value is 130,000, and 95% of place=city have a population=* value over 20,000. However, 13% have a population=* value between 20,000 and 50,000. 

I confronti internazionali possono essere difficili, perché i calcoli di popolazione variano con diverse dimensioni dei comuni di riferimento, ma secondo le statische sopra, l'uso per centri più piccoli non è poi così raro.

(Bisogna poi vedere se i valori di popolazione sono corretti o aggiornati).

Ciao.