piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 21:56:14+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
highflyer74 (2017-07-30 13:05:03+00:00): Hallo und danke für das Hinzufügen der Gebäude und Adressen! Wenn Du Objekte einzeichnest, achte vorzugsweise darauf, sie danach rechtwinklig zu machen. Das geht bei jedem Editor per Knopfdruck.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
gileri (2017-07-30 15:36:28+00:00): Hello,

- "Fee" is not a valid tag
- fee=* should not contain the cost of the service, but only yes or no
- fee=yes was already present
az09 (2017-12-10 19:45:19+00:00): Хитро)) Но лучше так не поступать
user_5359 (2017-07-30 05:57:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317878916 ? I think you modification is a duplicate entry. And why did you add a different name and website?

If you need help: You are welcome.
Paul Rahfield (2017-07-30 13:30:55+00:00): I edited it because most of this area is years out of date. Crescent Pie and Sausage closed in 2014, Midcity Pizza as occupied the building at 4400 Banks since then.
user_5359 (2017-07-30 14:14:17+00:00): I have corrected the situation. Thanks you updated the business information.
highflyer74 (2017-07-30 12:57:35+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!

Please keep mind the formatting of housenumbers to have no space between number and letter. Also in Bremen, we usually do not use capital letters to map housenumbers. I fixed it already, so no worries ;-)

The larger building already had the address mapped to it (it consists of several parts).

If you have any questions, just let me know!

Wenn deutsch als Sprache bevorzugt ist, gern auch das, ich habe englisch geschrieben, da Du einen englischsprachigen JOSM verwendest.
koastoas (2020-08-28 05:51:05+00:00): noexit=yes wir auf einen Punkt am Ende des Weges gesetzt und nicht auf den ganzen Weg angewendet. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202901695#map=19/48.09401/11.84164
eggie (2017-07-29 19:43:21+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-29 19:46:15+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om de voetpaden te plakken aan de landuse grass. Ik maak het even los.
eggie (2017-07-29 19:48:44+00:00): Je hebt de adresnode verwijderd bij nummer twee. Was dat de bedoeling. Graag reactie
eggie (2017-07-29 19:50:33+00:00): adresnode hersteld http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50678939
Michael Harteveld (2017-07-29 19:52:15+00:00): Sorry, dan heb ik dat per ongeluk gedaan. Goed dat er in het begin meegekeken wordt! Ik hoop op een positieve manier te kunnen bijdragen. Zal in het vervolg beter opletten.
eggie (2017-07-29 19:59:29+00:00): Dag Michael... er wordt je niks kwalijk genomen. In het begin wordt meegekeken. .. ook om te helpen. 
Je laatste changeset heb ik teruggedraaid. Geen adresgegevens op gebouwen zelf zetten. Die zijn al bij import vanuit de BAG op nodes meegekomen.
eggie (2017-07-29 20:05:45+00:00): De adresnode nr 2 was ergens op de Melkweg terecht gekomen. Zie achavi. Net teruggesleept.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door voldoende in te zoomen. Editor iD lijkt wel lijm te hebben.
Wanneer je door wil zetten met mappen schakel dan snel over naar editor JOSM voordat je aan iD gewend raakt.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
marc__marc (2018-06-19 21:40:46+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai beaucoup de mal à comprendre cet arrêt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7427954
c'est apparemment la plateforme d'attente de l'arrêt de tram mais cette plateforme est déjà représentée par https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156560747
sur ce dernier objet, il y a le tag railway=tram_stop qui d'après le wiki indique la position (un noeud) ou le tram s'arrête et fait donc partie du rail mais le rail est représenté juste à côté.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_stop
De plus c'est une multipolygone qui exclu les 2 abris, qui sont pourtant partie intégrante de la zone d'attente du tram.
Par conséquent ne faudrait-il pas simplifier pour éviter tous ces doublons ?
le way 156560747 avec le tag plateform et width=3 rassemble toutes les infos actuelle sans doublon.
J'ai posté aussi le message sur la ml transport
Cordialement,
Marc
Virgile1994 (2018-06-24 19:48:28+00:00): Salut.
Le multipolygone, c'est une ville mauvaise habitude que j'avais. J’avais vu ça je ne sais plus où, je l'ai repris sans me poser de question. Depuis, j'ai arrêté, justement pour les raisons que tu évoques, le risque que ce ne soit pas considéré par certains outils.
Et pour le doublon, ce n'en n'est pas un puisque cela décrit deux éléments différentes. Le Platform surfacique représente la surface d'attente, le linéaire représente "l'interface" entre le véhicule et l'extérieur, par où l'on monte et descend.
Virgile.

Ha, et le tag tram_stop, c'est une erreur de ma part. Désolé.
eggie (2017-07-29 19:54:12+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling dat er nog adresgegevens op een gebouw zelf komen. Dat zit al op de adresnodes. Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-07-29 19:56:34+00:00): Reverted changeset 50679148
chnav (2017-07-31 04:34:46+00:00): У нас серьёзный проект, пожалуйста не вносите на карту несуществубщие объекты (офис посреди деревенского огорода и пр.), в MAPS.ME для этого есть личные закладки.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:15:39+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=italian;#
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1041535705/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=italian
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
JamesKingdom (2017-07-29 20:32:26+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,
Just a note, please remember to square buildings after you have drawn them.
You can do this by:
right clicking > square, or pushing "s".
Thanks!

Merhaba ve OSM'ye hoş geldiniz,
Sadece bir not, binaları çizdikten sonra kareler oluşturmayı lütfen unutmayın.
Şunları yapabilirsiniz:
Sağ klikleyerek> kare veya "s" yi iterek.
Teşekkürler!
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:30:13+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50679810
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 10:26:22+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
chillly (2017-08-01 17:14:56+00:00): Hi,
Adding the designated= xxx is not widely using the UK. It is intended to show a specific legal restriction which often doesn't apply in the UK. In the UK it is more common to use designation=public_footpath or designation-public_bridleway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Tagging_Access_Provisions

Mass editing of tags on a collection of objects (like this edit) is also frowned up as a mass-edit. We like these discussed in advance by the local community, in this case the talk-gb email list or talk-gb IRC channel would work.  I suggest you would not get agreement for these changes.

Feel free to discuss here, but a wider audience would be better.
wille (2017-07-31 11:04:58+00:00): Olá, mgalib

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições! Fiz algumas correções nos dados que você enviou... sempre procure no editor um preset que corresponde ao que você quer enviar. Nessa edição, por exemplo, você colocou name_1=informatica, quando deveria ter procurado por informátiva nas opções apresentadas após você adicionar o ponto.

Continue colaborando e se tiver alguma dúvida, estou à disposição para ajudar!
mueschel (2017-07-30 15:37:35+00:00): Hi,
some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004

Ja
Alan Bragg (2017-08-01 18:46:51+00:00): Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected.
user_5359 (2017-07-30 06:06:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you to correct the data. But please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant .
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 21:46:57+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
GinaroZ (2017-07-29 21:33:53+00:00): Hi Mark, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. To mark this medical centre as a doctors, type doctors into the editor's preset list or add the tag amenity=doctors. Cheers
ndm (2017-07-29 23:17:37+00:00): Thanks for the updates -- a changeset comment would have improved them -- and made them easier to understand.
eggie (2017-07-30 06:27:34+00:00): What do you mean with wikidata  Q17286882 ?
multichill (2017-07-30 10:05:40+00:00): Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata eggie.
eggie (2017-07-30 13:48:31+00:00): Oke.. thanks..
letihu (2017-09-19 20:50:14+00:00): Sicher, dass das Schloß hier steht? Es gibt auch Überschneidungen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85851577/history.
Auf den Luftbildern ist auch nichts zu erkennen.
ChristianA (2017-09-20 05:54:21+00:00): You have to be there to see how it is, I think. The building that can be seen on the aerial imagery is some sort of garage or industrial building. It seems to be standing on the ruin of a small part of the caste. I could be mistaken of course, but that is how it looked to me. Note that the outline of the castle ruin is taken from an old blueprint fitted to my gps trace, which was not very accurate. So I am sure it can be done better than I did, but that woud require multiple gps traces and I did not have much time during my visit.
nammala (2017-07-31 07:20:37+00:00): Hi Kaustuv,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding random parks and buildings on the map. OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth not fictional data. Please don't add bad data on the map.

Regards,
nammala
5m4u9 (2017-07-30 06:53:25+00:00): thanks for located this factory. was improved
Brian@Brea (2017-08-13 08:51:19+00:00): Why have you deleted SeaWorld Orlando? Are you planning a draw of the map or are you vandalizing the map?
Editing (2017-08-13 13:57:29+00:00): Yes but I seem to not have the time. If anyone could help that would be great.
iandees (2017-08-13 14:11:07+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51083052
wichardj (2017-07-29 23:26:26+00:00): Korrekte Quelle: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1385016271533765.1073741859.219685704733500&type=3
Hjart (2017-07-30 08:02:22+00:00): I have corrected the source tag so that it reflects this
iey6Om7C (2017-08-28 09:55:40+00:00): Колодец в многоэтажке?
Chetan_Gowda (2017-08-02 05:40:43+00:00): Hi I appreciate for joining OpenStreetMap. This is the real world map. You changed the building tags to landuse=residential tag. To learn quickly about editing and mapping, go through https://learnosm.org
manoharuss (2017-08-07 06:17:57+00:00): Hi villainsurgentes,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Some of the trunk highways mapped here seem like they are primary or secondary. Please refer to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for understanding the highway tagging schema.

Thank you,

Manohar
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 09:42:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002354021/history has name = Noname that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
That is probably object without name, not object named "Noname". I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes would work better here, should it be changed?
chachafish (2017-09-22 08:39:42+00:00): Greetings. I've been researching the name change you created for I-25 in Denver; "Dwight D. Eisenhower Highway". I looked at the source you sighted. The first part of the article states the Dwight D. Eisenhower Highway ran from, "I-270 between the Capital Beltway and I-70 in Frederick, Maryland, I-70 to I-25 in Denver, I-25 to I-80 at Cheyenne, Wyoming, and I-80 to San Francisco." While this was correct in 1973, if you read further in the same article you'll see this name, "never took hold". In the same article you'll see in 1990 the entire U.S. interstate system was named after Eisenhower. You can see this map here: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/interstate/finalmap.cfm. In Colorado, we call this highway I-25. or colloquially, the Valley Highway. Specifically, North Valley Highway for addresses north of Ellsworth Avenue (in Denver) and South Valley Highway south of Ellsworth Avenue. Thanks and happy mapping :)
DaveF (2017-07-30 10:01:31+00:00): Hi
Could you refrain from joining polygons, in this case residential areas, to the centreline of roads. It causes problems when adding entities such a gates to field areas.
imperialmog (2017-07-31 20:29:35+00:00): I noticed there are actually a few little errors on the labeling on this. the landuse retail covers the entire parcel containing the mall as it shows the relationship between features. Also some of the building labels is off. Commercial refers to offices and building = public should be access = public.

I might take a look at the area since i also see a few other errors in the area where landuse = retail is defining buildings and not shopping areas as a whole .
eggie (2017-07-30 06:12:59+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-30 06:21:35+00:00): Geen tourist attraction bekend hier..
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2017-07-30 06:24:04+00:00): Reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50684251
vichada (2017-07-30 05:30:44+00:00): Sorry wrong changeset comment: should be:
#hotosm-project-2261 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust #Tanzania #missingmaps

and source only:
DigitalGlobe Std. (no offset)
Mr_Brown (2017-08-22 21:57:33+00:00): Hello, can you explain to me the deletions that you made? I saw and read the link you provided in the changset description. It seems to detail the process it took for the commerative name to take place, but that doesn't explain to me why you chose to delete the additions I made and how they affected the naming of the highway. Thanks in advance.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:16:47+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Pierce (2018-12-22 03:14:52+00:00): Hi There, There's a few places you've added where you've put a description in as the name. If uncertain, I suggest throwing it in a note, description or fixme field where appropriate.
freeExec (2017-07-31 11:26:53+00:00): Объясните что вы делаете, почему всё время удаляете?
eggie (2017-07-30 09:31:01+00:00): Oke.. goede edit..
Wanneer het park een naam heeft zou dat er nog bijkunnen. Ik heb de Leisure park even losgemaakt van de ander landuse. Zo'n Leisure hoort nergens aan vast geplakt te zitten.
eggie (2017-11-22 10:19:05+00:00): Use this as an example for parkedits. 
Please reply.
Glassman (2017-07-30 14:05:04+00:00): I tightened up the your building outline to the building and merged the apartment node with the building outline. You might have be intending to outline the property the Broadmoor sits on. If that's the case, you can use landuse=residential.
Carolus Rex (2017-07-31 19:43:33+00:00): Thanks. I'm still learning the ropes.
chnav (2018-10-06 17:49:37+00:00): Правка откачена. Ни о чем, со спутником не совпадает.
eggie (2017-07-30 09:23:46+00:00): Please merge your tag with the address-node.
literan (2017-07-31 12:40:44+00:00): Добрый день. Прошу вас не менять теги на дорогах безосновательно (видимо, вы не ознакоилимь с документацией). Грунтовая дорога или нет - ничего не значит для ее статуса, грунтовость задается тегом surface. Тег highway задается статусом дороги в дорожной сети страны, а нее материалом, шириной, ровностью и т.п.. Я откачу вашу правку.
eggie (2017-07-30 09:38:58+00:00): removed tourism attraction from CIJ Borculo BV /merged info with address node BAG
eggie (2017-07-30 09:39:58+00:00): 
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2017-07-30 09:42:59+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Campanile Delft
ma-rt-in (2017-07-31 12:37:19+00:00): wenn es noch nicht geöffnet hat, dann bitte in opening_hours=off angeben
jklippel (2017-08-13 08:08:34+00:00): Mit Änderung 51074481 angepasst. Danke für den Hinweis.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51074481#map=19/49.92890/7.05796
AkuAnakTimur (2017-07-30 16:17:04+00:00): Hi, please consider using DigitalGlobe Premium imagery. Bing imagery is from 10 years ago. At least DigitalGlobe is more recent.
soale (2017-07-30 17:15:57+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the suggestion. I will use DigitalGlobe Premium for my edits in the future. Is the imagery available for most of the Peninsular Malaysia and Borneo?
AkuAnakTimur (2017-07-30 18:46:48+00:00): IMHO DigitalGlobe Premium might be more useful as you go further down south Peninsular Malaysia. Try checking DigitalGlobe Standard sometimes too.

To map across George Town only, apparently DigitalGlobe Premium is the best one.

I can't speak much about Borneo, but so far, both DigitalGlobe layers could be hit and miss, especially in very remote areas. Cities and some major places could probably be OK.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 23:02:36+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
Gumeg (2017-08-03 20:19:33+00:00): Добрый день! А зачем вы подняли так сильно статус у многих дорог? Пожалуйста прочитайте соглашение о дорогах в России http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
RicoElectrico (2017-07-30 10:41:41+00:00): Te schody to powinny się z czymś łączyć, inaczej nie ma co liczyć na routing...
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 23:04:54+00:00): Kolejny głupek psujący dane.
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-07-30 20:00:39+00:00): Se non è proprio indispensabile non andrebbero mai eliminati oggetti o tratti di strada per ricrearli da zero: così si distrugge tutta la history dell'oggetto
Stereo (2017-07-30 11:25:32+00:00): As far as I know it’s only temporarily during the construction that this is going to be rerouted. I’ll try to remember to check when the construction is done.
wilda69 (2017-07-30 11:33:57+00:00): You are correct. I saw that the notices say that the basin d'orage should be completed by "September 2016!"  Maybe they should change it to 2018. The deviation for the PC2 is however clearly marked
dmlu (2018-05-09 12:12:39+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why you mapped a part of the way as "Rue de la Barrière; Am Bongert"? From the official dataset, the housenumber 36 belongs to Rue de la Barrière, while 78 belongs to "Am Bongert".
Stereo (2018-05-11 14:20:37+00:00): Rue de la barrière used to go south over the pétrusse where the PC1 is now. I've corrected the cut-off to the intersection.
sabas88 (2017-07-30 11:29:27+00:00): Ciao,
intanto volevo complimentarmi per i dettagli che stai aggiungendo :-)
Qui probabilmente sarebbe da estendere il tratto carrabile di via riboli fino all'inizio di questa strada di servizio che hai aggiunto, accorciando il tratto pedonale.
sp4rkie (2017-07-30 10:50:16+00:00): in the course of editing the new track (511461636, v1) by means of JOSM building 358514118, v2 has been inadvertently modified. Because a trackpoint 'snapped' to the building (it's located quite close to the building). I noticed that and undid the unwanted building change. But the building stays in JOSM modified state (when I checked before upload). 

Even after uploading the building in fact got updated (by my name). But no change really was applied.
 
Can I manually avoid that behavior? 
Is it ok was has happened?
Nakaner (2017-07-30 12:51:23+00:00): If you hold the Ctrl key while drawing, you can avoid snapping to an existing way/node.

Use the G key to unclue connected ways.
sp4rkie (2017-07-30 13:30:57+00:00): thanks a lot for hinting this. 

one problem remains: 
how to avoid uploading objects that are tagged 'changed' internally in JOSM even if all changes to that object have been reverted in JOSM?
sp4rkie (2017-07-30 13:59:30+00:00): I played around a little and found a possible solution (not very elegant but works):

1. search for modified objects in the  data layer to be uploaded
2. create a new data layer
3. manually transfer (per cut&paste) only those objects to the new layer that have been modified 'really'. As JOSM leaves objects in 'modified' state even if there  no longer are any changes (i.e. object is clean).
4. upload the new layer to OSM. Discard the original data layer.
GerdP (2017-08-23 08:03:57+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=Plaça de la Font on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303728532 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511462073
Hjart (2017-07-30 11:54:27+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Du har måske bemærket at jeg har rettet lidt i nogle af de ting du har lavet. I den forbindelse vil jeg godt gøre opmærksom på at vi anbefaler at vejnet og områder (marker mm) holdes adskilte (ikke deler noder)
Viajero Perdido (2017-08-05 16:01:16+00:00): I've restored some wood areas that suddenly went missing.
Sanniu (2017-10-16 09:32:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511466136 and nearby path are not connected to the road. Is it by mistake or they are really floating?
weizmann (2017-10-24 08:49:07+00:00): 
Hi
If I am not mistaked - it is small residentional area,  So driving road ends there. Just foot path go throuh
Sanniu (2017-10-24 08:53:18+00:00): It's not about driving road itself - the small foot paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511466136, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511466137 are not connected to that driving road.