piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nmxosm (2018-10-14 07:44:56+00:00): Hallo gengis_cohen, 
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe deinen Änderungssatz gesehen und mir sind einige Dinge aufgefallen, die noch verbessert werden sollten.
Dies bezieht sich auf alle deine bisherigen Änderungen. 

Da du Veränderungen an den Radwegen vorgenommen hast, ist es sinnvoll, diese mit Hilfe des Radwege-Layers unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.11125/8.69442&layers=C zu überprüfen, sobald das deine Änderungen dort auftauchen.
Dies ist aktuell leider nicht der Fall. Beachte dabei trotzdem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer

Mir sind bisher diese Punkte aufgefallen:

1. Dein neuer Radweg war implizit schon gemappt. Siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314926668
Bei den Straßen entlang deines neuen Radwegs war immer schon cycleway=* angegeben.
Wenn du jetzt eine separate Kartierung dessen vornimmst (mMn besser), sollten diese Tags entfernt werden. 
Das betrifft auch access-Tags wie z.B. bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357362068

2. Deine Wege enthalten Nodes, wo keine Kurve ist. Das ist so unvorteilhaft: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gerade_Wege_bleiben_gerade

3. Deine Wege kreuzen Fußwege an ungewöhnlichen stellen und ohne gemeinsame Node (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Kreuzungen)

Bei weiteren Fragen gibt es immer verschiedene Wege, andere Mitwirkende zu fragen:
Änderungssatzkommentare (wie dieser),
Notes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/new
Mailinglisten (lists.osm.org)
Foren (forum.osm.org, help.osm.org)

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
literan (2018-10-13 11:19:02+00:00): правильные теги для подъездов: entrance=staircase
ref=8 (для 8 подъезда). Исправил.
viloan (2018-10-12 22:10:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2018-10-13 11:14:57+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294359553/history#map=19/55.83933/37.48581 дорогу уничтожили. Откачу это.
woodpeck (2018-10-13 17:47:31+00:00): Hallo, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2288 hatte ich Dich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass wir bei OSM sehr auf unsere Quellen achten müssen. In diesem Changeset hier hast Du wieder einigen Haltestellen ein "ref:VBB" hinzugefügt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/651927536/history). Ist die Quelle dafür eine Ortsbegehung? In dem Fall füge doch Deinem Changeset ein "source=survey" hinzu.
johndoe (2018-10-14 21:28:50+00:00): Hallo woodpeck,
bitte recherchiere in Zukunft doch besser: der Tag ist bereits vor vier Jahren auf die zugehörige Relation gesetzt worden (vgl. Relation #4432716, Version #3). Bitte schließe Dich nicht jetzt auch noch der Hexenjagd an!

Beste Grüße
johndoe
bergaufsee (2018-10-15 16:33:08+00:00): Hallo johndoe,
warum gehst du immer davon aus, dass man dir etwas Böses will? In dem von dir erwähnten CS wurde immerhin eine Quelle genannt, nur das wird auch von dir erwartet. Auch wenn die Quelle leider nicht im aktuellen Zustand zulässig ist, da die vom VBB geforderte Nennung in der Liste der Beitragenden fehlt. Erst wenn diese beiden Bedingungen (oder eine plausible survey Quelle) erfüllt sind, können diese Daten auch durch OSM genutzt werden.
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-15 02:18:59+00:00): service=driveway or service=alley?  I think you meant alley.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63474810
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:43:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:43:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
tonyf1 (2018-10-13 01:50:44+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your map contribution. I deleted the name and name:fr tags. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for an explanation
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
eggie (2018-10-14 07:33:54+00:00): Wat is je bedoeling om op een sloot oneway=no toe te voegen? 
Je ziet pijltjes staan. Dat is de richting dat het water normaliter stroomt. In de richting van het gemaal. Het heeft niets te maken met een verkeerssituatie.
eggie (2018-10-14 07:37:41+00:00): oneway=no  restrictie van sloot verwijderd.
Het heeft niets met verkeer te maken. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-14 07:39:38+00:00): Svp geen oneway=no op een sloot zetten. Die pijltjes duiden de stroomrichting naar het gemaal of de boezem.
eggie (2018-10-14 07:45:45+00:00): Pas je het aan?
eggie (2018-10-14 16:39:36+00:00): eenrichtingsverkeerstag van sloot verwijderd
eggie (2018-10-14 07:03:14+00:00): Beste GH.. Je mag water niet mappen op het land. Dat hoort netjes ingebed te zijn in de landuse. Editor iD is volkomen ongeschikt voor dit werk. Dit gebied zijn allemaal multipolygonen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-14 07:19:57+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast...
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-13 04:25:37+00:00): Hi Alatra. Your edit looks awesome, but I change tag natural=water (id 633540158) to landuse=grass as seen in imagery. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142907736). Thank you.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:42:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:41:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
zluuzki (2022-01-13 11:20:52+00:00): not exactly an solar plant ...
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:41:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
mavl (2018-10-13 05:58:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Вы добавили гостевой дом. Вы уверены, что это действительно гостевой дом, а не обычный жилой дом? Что такое гостевой дом (tourism=guest_house) в OpenStreetMap можно прочитать в статье [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house].
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:40:18+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:41:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:41:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
b-jazz (2018-10-23 04:47:25+00:00): Hi @EuleKC. If this isn't really a building, and clearly it isn't, it shouldn't be labelled as one. Maybe you are looking for a place=suburb designation instead. That would be a more appropriate tag.
EuleKC (2018-10-25 19:46:34+00:00): I'm not actually sure how to tag this.  It's man-made, not a naturally occurring feature.  It started out as a limestone mine, but it isn't used that way any longer - the company that owns it rents space in it to other businesses, for storage and manufacturing operations.

At one point, all of the mined-out space was interconnected, but the owners have built walls linking the remaining limestone pillars.  You could say it's a series of separate "buildings" now... or you could say it's one big "building" with several large rooms in it.  It is possible to drive a vehicle underground to reach the various rooms/buildings.

I am not affiliated with the owners of this site or any of the companies located there.

If a good way to map/tag this can be found, there are some other facilities in the KC area (Downtown Underground, Space Center, Meritex) that should be mapped the same way.
Minh Nguyen (2018-10-26 00:57:22+00:00): There are established ways of tagging underground subway stations and tunnels, but not subterranean developments in general that I know of. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/552 tracks rendering such structures in a sensible way.
Minh Nguyen (2018-10-26 00:59:45+00:00): One option, by analogy with underground parking structures and natural caves, is to avoid mapping the whole structure as a building (but maybe as something else) and focus on mapping only the entrances as features in their own right.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-06 00:49:57+00:00): Um usuário esta deletando varias coisas que você fez: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63939215
jpgon (2018-11-06 15:08:06+00:00): Boa tarde Erick. Vou verificar o que está ocorrendo. Muito obrigado pelo alerta.
SJFriedl (2018-10-23 04:48:49+00:00): This changeset included a description of the wellness center *attached to the street itself*, so this is at best incorrect, and probably spam. I've deleted this description/phone/email stuff.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:40:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Jakka (2018-10-13 16:53:42+00:00): Correction of edit.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:39:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Supaplex (2018-10-13 13:34:19+00:00): 龍山寺 is duplicated.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4124517
StephaneP (2018-10-19 14:27:53+00:00): Salut !
Pourquoi avoir tracé des pistes cyclables dans cette zone ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633570807
Je ne vois que des bandes cyclables, et c'est de cette façon qu'elles étaient taggées précédemment.

A bientôt
johnparis (2018-10-19 16:24:21+00:00): C'etait pour faire les connexions avec les autre pistes, mais tu as raison, ils ne sont pas physiquement separées. Je corrige (j'espere).
StephaneP (2018-10-19 16:25:28+00:00): Super !
johnparis (2018-10-19 16:31:31+00:00): C'est fait. Merci de vérifier.
Vincent de Phily (2018-10-13 22:38:10+00:00): Just adding a fixme tag isn't much of a fix :p ?

Adding that empty relation was a mishap; the feature was already mapped as another object. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63496329
sebastic (2018-10-14 06:11:28+00:00): There are many more old-style multipolygons in the dataset I process each day, I cannot be bothered to use distrinct changeset comments for each.

Adding the fixme tag ensures that the relation doesn't show up in the old-style dataset, and that it shows up in other QA tools.
Vincent de Phily (2018-10-14 19:44:59+00:00): Moving the problem from one QA category to another doesn't seem that useful ? Arguably harmful in this case: I'd rather be able to look for old-style MPs than digging thru FIXMEs when I do fixup using QA tools, because FIXMEs are way too numerous and diverse for me to handle whereas MP problems are rarer and have a clear importance and fixup workflow.

I'm curious what QA tool you use that doesn't flag an old-style MP just because it has a fixme attached ? The fixme tag didn't change anything, the QA tool should still flag this as an old-style MP. For what it's worth, I found this flagged as old-style MP using OSMI Area QA tool.

Lastly, the fix was easy in this case: that relation simply needed to be deleted, it didn't represent any feature that wasn't already repersented.
sebastic (2018-10-15 05:16:43+00:00): The old-style multipolygon dataset is part of the area fixing effort:

 http://area.jochentopf.com/

While the task is marked as done, new old-style multipolygons are still created on a daily basis, and I still fix those.

As I'm fixing many issues, I'm not going to spend time digging for the reason an old-style multipolygon exists. If the fix is not obvious, I mark the relation as needing proper tags for a local mapper to fix, and move on to the next.
Vincent de Phily (2018-10-15 21:28:36+00:00): Fair enough that you can't spend too much time on each issue. I skip a lot of non-trivial issues myself.

But that relation will still show up on QA tools such as Jochen's or OSMI's checkers after you added a fixme, and IMHO the fixme tag doesn't make the issue more visible. I feel that fixme tags are much less likely to get attention than area errors or even a note, and I wouldn't add a fixme (or a note) to something that is already detected by automated tools.

But that's just me; if you think it's worth it, go ahead, there's nothing wrong  with adding fixmes.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-20 19:50:09+00:00): @sebastic Re " I cannot be bothered to use distrinct changeset comments for each"  I strongly recommend that you become bothered to do that, otherwise you may find yourself prevented from editing OpenStreetMap.
OSM only works because it is a community, and people within a community have to communicate with each other in a civil manner.  This isn't the only example of this; I was actually prompted to look at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=665748 and hence find this changeset by the high-handed "JOSM Validator is your friend" comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71456361 .  Looking at the longer list of comments that's far from a unique example unfortunately.  Please don't assume that your time is somehow valuable and that of other mappers isn't, or that you have all the answers/skills/whatever and others do not.
Take a step back, and remember that every time you're communicating with the rest of the OpenStreetMap community you're talking to lots of different human beings just like you.  They'll have different interests and different time committments to OSM (but often they'll be more familiar with the places that you're editing than you are).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:39:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Volker Fröhlich (2018-10-14 17:11:28+00:00): Ich habe den Eindruck, dass die Öffnungszeiten so nicht funktionieren werden. Vielleicht braucht man einen "comment"? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours/specification#comment
eggie (2018-10-13 07:29:41+00:00): Die landuse=residentials kun je gewoon aanpassen. Die zijn vaak willekeurig. We opletten dat een andere mapper er niets aan vast heeft geplakt (vaak wel zo) , want alles komt dan mee. Ook kilometers verder op. Dus nooit een vlak verplaatsen. 
Meestal maak ik van te voren met de G-toets zo'n residential helemaal los .
Pieter - Amsterdam (2018-10-13 07:49:34+00:00): Ik zal er aan denken. 
Ik heb contact gehad met de vorige mapper.
Pieter - Amsterdam (2018-10-13 12:48:29+00:00): Ik zal er aan denken. 
Ik heb contact gehad met de vorige mapper.
hu9o (2018-10-13 17:48:23+00:00): Je trouve que cette intervention appauvrit les données. Les arbres étaient correctement positionnées, leurs présence était une information plus précise qu'une rangée d'arbre.
hu9o (2018-10-13 17:49:58+00:00): (je parle de la rangée d'arbre dans le cimetière uniquement https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633574957 )
CartoCharles (2018-10-18 09:51:44+00:00): Il vaut mieux en effet laisser les arbres individuels. Cela peut se cumuler avec le way de l'alignement s'il s'agit bien d'un alignement d'arbre.
eggie (2018-10-13 07:21:50+00:00): Op dat vlak heb ik nog area=yes toegevoegd.. anders zie je wegen ipv een vlak. 
Dat was nog een foutje van mij uit 2011 zie ik.
Zal hier even niets meer doen, anders zitten we elkaar in de weg. Up to you!
eggie (2018-10-13 07:17:22+00:00): Yep.. Je zet op de "weg" zelf barrier=bollard. Gewoon ééntje is genoeg.
eggie (2018-10-13 07:19:10+00:00): .. en ik zou een verbinding maken met dat parallelpad voor een juiste routering. gebruik gewoon highway=path en surface=paved
eggie (2018-10-13 07:31:58+00:00): Ik zou het gewoon highway=pedestrian laten, want het is eigenlijk een voetgangersgebied. Die paaltjes staan er voor de gemeentewerkers e.d.
eggie (2018-10-13 08:17:00+00:00): De landuse=residential heb ik aangepast bij de Brederode. Dat is inmiddels opgeleverd. Je zou de building=construction kunnen veranderen in building=house
construction=house kan helemaal weg. Voel je overigens niet verplicht, want het is een hele klus.
rjaksic (2018-10-18 07:52:04+00:00): natural=coastline & place=islet/island definiraju obalu i otoke! Bez ovih oznaka Jabuka npr. vise nije otok!!! Ako zelis definirati bare_rock i slicno, nacrtaj novi dodatni polygon, ne brisi postojeci coastline...

Ovo *obavezno* treba popraviti i vratiti natrag (Jabuka, Mala Palagruza i ostali otocici)!!!

pozdrav, rj
Supaplex (2018-10-13 13:32:42+00:00): 這家店有名字嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63478763
Parzelle13 (2018-10-13 10:13:35+00:00): Vielleicht weil du nicht lernfähig bist. Warum bist du sonst wiedereinmal gesperrt worden?
Parzelle13 (2018-10-14 08:14:42+00:00): Das ganze ist lediglich ein kompletter Spielplatz. Das dieses Gelände mit den Spielgeräten mit Schotter gefüllt ist, wage ich zu bezweifeln. Viel Spaß, wenn dort ein Kind sich verletzt. Eher runder Kies, Sand oder Holzschnitzel als Füllung. Einzelne Spielgeräte/Sandkästen etc. kann man übrigens mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground: erfassen und muss sie nicht alle einzeln als Spielplatz eintragen.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
GerdP (2018-10-13 07:29:57+00:00): Oops, wrong comment. I meant see cs 58474637 .
bskartograph (2018-10-13 15:28:23+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, wenn die Baustelle fertig sein sollte, werde ich es wieder korrigieren auf highway=tertiary
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:38:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Baloo Uriza (2019-01-26 20:39:55+00:00): What is the rationale for the notes on this?  All ODOT highways open to bicycles (and their official detours in the rare cases that they aren't) are official bike routes in Oregon.
Peter Dobratz (2019-01-27 02:28:04+00:00): Paul, I'm not sure what you are getting at here.

The purpose of this changeset was to update a TriMet Bus route.  What used to be known as bus route 4 has been split into bus routes 2 and 4.

That being said, many of the roads that make up these bus routes have some bicycle lane or access tags on them.  But again, the purpose of this changeset was updating public transportation bus route information in OSM.
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-01 00:48:19+00:00): Sorry, may have read through the history wrong.  Someone has modified the US 26 RCN route removing pretty much everywhere it actually coincides with US 26 for reasons not entirely clear.
user_2008655 (2022-01-23 04:18:14+00:00): 柏崎バイパス：2076139 vs. 8810362？
Otenkiya (2022-01-29 05:07:15+00:00): リレーション2076139は1965年に開通した最初の柏崎バイパスで、リレーション8810362は、1987年に事業化された、いわば二代目のバイパスとなります。Wikipediaを参照ください。
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
StephaneP (2018-10-19 14:17:04+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Pierre,
Je ne comprends pas trop la transformation des footway en service, qui sont plutôt des voies destinées aux véhicules motorisés.
Ca ne semble pas être le cas pour 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114309693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114309702
ainsi que pour la partie de la rue laurent fignon qui longe l'ouest de l'hotel ibis puisqu'elle se termine par des plots bloquant l'accès :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=MDjU6ad_svWlwIhi6H-svA&lat=48.78934027654344&lng=2.0351730245125736&z=17&x=0.8458419645294453&y=0.5527708985442622&zoom=0
eggie (2018-10-13 10:29:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Een voetpad zou kunnen, maar waarop de straatnaam verwijderd en maxspeed 30 laten staan?
eggie (2018-10-13 10:32:39+00:00): Weet je toevallig of de Sportlaan al weer open is? Die heeft iemand op construction gezet en routeert niet meer.
MVG,
Eggie