piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trial (2019-09-13 08:39:30+00:00): Le problème c'est que Karlsruhe en français c'est Karlsruhe, avec un K, comme en allemand. Carlsruhe avec un C est rare. Et non ce n'est pas non plus Le Repos de Charles ;-)
GerdP (2018-10-17 07:16:36+00:00): Hi! I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned:footway to the common
abandoned:highway=footway.
After doing that I wondered if abandoned: is the right prefix for a way that is not visible as
the wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for abandoned: starts with "still visible". Maybe you find a better prefix there?
jnstahl (2018-10-17 16:09:23+00:00): Difficult. No problem with the prefix, I thought that both versions are acceptable.
The problem with this section of the trail is that it is completely overgrown after a fire a decade ago and it basically amounts to bushwhacking. No discernible trail here. One option would be to delete this section entirely, but since it still exists on most physical maps, it seemed more prudent to mark it as abandoned. I could not find a tag that says 'very difficult passage' - ths SAC scale did not seem appropriate
GerdP (2018-10-17 16:26:52+00:00): I agree that it should be kept in this case. Maybe add a note that points to this discussion?
jnstahl (2018-10-17 16:47:39+00:00): It also seems that this was changed from "path" to "line"?
GerdP (2018-10-17 17:52:46+00:00): what do you mean? I see that you added the note but it was and still is a abandoned:highway=path
GerdP (2018-10-17 17:53:30+00:00): oops, meant footway, not path
maraf24 (2018-10-20 20:50:09+00:00): Jeśli ta droga jest dopiero w wariantach, to nie nadaje się do dodania do OSM nawet w postaci drogi planowanej.
sangsoucis (2023-02-07 09:06:58+00:00): la pompe à vélo est HS - ne fonctionne pas
Negreheb (2018-10-17 12:53:27+00:00): Hallo addresshistory, 

leider sind dir auch hier wieder einige Adressnodes neben Gebäude verrutscht. In der nähe vom Friedhof, in Waldreichs oben und in der nähe der Bachgasse. 
In Waldreichs ist dir auch eine zweite Hauptstraße 2 reingerutscht.

Danke für die ganzen Adressen!
ff5722 (2018-10-24 11:47:06+00:00): Why did you delete the lakes without retracing them? They are not incorrect, just crudely drawn.
katpatuka (2020-01-29 13:39:59+00:00): No need to delete SWBD sourced lakes - just retrace them (if they are not TOO big) ;) Some day someone (from time to tome like me) will come and retrace them anyway... :)
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
b-jazz (2018-11-22 07:59:53+00:00): Something very strange happened to the shape of the "guest house". I tried to fix it up. Please check and see if correct now. (Also, it shouldn't be named "Guest House". Descriptions of things shouldn't be used as their name. There is a description tag that would be more appropriate.)
maciek-szn (2018-10-16 21:57:47+00:00): Ech, zepsułeś wszystkie linie autobusowe przejeżdżające przez przystanek "Police Piaskowa". W trasie zamiast przystanku pojawił się jakiś węzeł na chodniku.
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-10-16 22:15:07+00:00): hmm, nie widzę nic...Ale jak zmieniałem to faktycznie "Police Piaskowa" w stronę Wyszyńskiego był zespolony z chodnikiem. Oderwałem go od chodnika.
maciek-szn (2018-10-17 11:03:25+00:00): Bo poprawiłem. To pewnie może dlatego, że był przyklejony do chodnika.
Luzandro (2018-12-20 06:22:06+00:00): Die Sub-Adressen hier ergeben keinen Sinn: entweder housenumber=3/1 oder housenumber=3 + unit=1, aber nicht beides zusammen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382659662/history#map=18/48.79321/15.39871
Glassman (2018-10-16 23:36:59+00:00): Here is a tip for you. Buildings can easily be squared by selecting the outline then type an "s". Also, try to match the imagery. For example the Conoco gas station. The roof area should be separate from the convenience store. We tag the roof over the pumps as building=roof layer=1. (The layer=1 means you can also draw in a service road under the roof and routers will know that they aren't directing cars to drive into a building. I'll send you a message with more information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63593533
eggie (2018-10-17 07:12:32+00:00): Voor wie is de loopbrug bestemd omdat je met access=no (totaalverbod.. wit bord rode rand) en later met access=permit begint?
Glassman (2018-10-16 23:39:45+00:00): Nice corrections. BTW here is one tip. To square a building just select the outline and type an "s"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63593606
eggie (2018-10-17 07:13:15+00:00): Oke!
Stereo (2018-10-22 14:59:55+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM and congratulations on your first edit!

Do you maybe know if there's a path missing there, maybe steps to reach the cafe from Eqrem Qabaj?

Happy mapping :)
Geofreund1 (2018-11-11 09:23:41+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,
du hast fleißig sehr viele Adressen in "Hartheim" eingetragen. Aber heißt die Gemeinde nicht "Hartheim am Rhein"?
q_un_go (2018-11-11 22:29:30+00:00): Heißt die echt so? den Rhein im Namen lassen nur alle weg...
wie auch bei Breisach. ;-)
okay, muss dann wohl das am Rhein dazu (auch wenn das kaum jemand benutzt)
q_un_go (2018-11-11 22:30:55+00:00): Wobei:
Bei Feldkirch benutzt die Gemeindeverwaltung als Ortsbezeichnung dann "Hartheim-Feldkirch" und nicht "Hartheim am Rhein", zumindest auf der Homepage...
Geofreund1 (2018-11-12 08:45:56+00:00): Der offizielle Name und der landläufige Sprachgebrauch differieren wohl häufig, was uns aber nicht hindern sollte, möglichst korrekt zu mappen. Im Wikipedia ist übrigens zu lesen:
"In 2012, the name of the town was changed from Hartheim to Hartheim am Rhein."

Da Hartheim am Rhein aus mehreren Teilorten besteht, kann man dortige Adressen optional z.B. mit addr:suburb=Hartheim-Feldkirch bezeichnen, was aber am offiziellen (OSM) Namen addr:city=Hartheim am Rhein nichts ändern sollte. Die Post dürfte aber wohl an beide Arten von Adressen ankommen ;-)
InsertUser (2018-10-18 06:10:33+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM. 
I notice you have tagged a couple of swimming pools as ponds. The typical tagging for these is leisure=swimming_pool. This is easiest to find in the online iD editor using the search bar at the top of the left panel.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63593789
blauer_elefant (2019-05-08 16:22:30+00:00): Hi, sehr umfangreiches bicycle-Tagging, eigentlich hübsch. Aber leider teilweise falsch: oneway:bicycle=yes führt dazu, dass der betroffene Way als Einbahnstraße für Radfahrer interpretiert wird. Falls Du angeben möchtest, dass Radwege nur in eine Richtung befahren werden dürfen, muss ein :right: bzw. :left: ergänzt werden (s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren_L%C3%BCbecker_Methode und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#cite_note-oneway-5). Eine Folge des falschen Taggings ist, dass Router entgegen der Way-Richtung einen Umweg vorschlagen, in Way-Richtung aber nicht.
Vielleicht kannst Du bei Gelegenheit selbst prüfen, wo Du oneway:bicycle=yes gesetzt hast, und ob es dort richtig oder falsch ist. Danke!
pyram (2018-12-28 11:08:22+00:00): Hallo EvanE,

gibt es irgendeinen nachvollziehbaren Grund, warum du die Namen der Haltestellen am ZOB in Nürnberg geändert hast?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4056375692/history
EvanE (2019-01-17 16:58:44+00:00): Selbstverständlich. 

Sieh mal auf das Tagg bus_routes. Da siehst du, dass an dieser Haltestelle Fernbusse halten. 

Wenn du dann in einer Fernbuslinie mehrere Haltestellen namens ZOB oder ähnliches hast, so ist das nicht sehr übersichtlich. Von daher ergänze ich bei den Fernbushalten gerne den Ortsnamen, damit man wenigstens eine Orientierung zwischen den diversen Halten hat. 

Aus lokaler Sicht mag das überflüssig erscheinen, Wenn man Probleme in Fernbuslinien bereinigen will, ist das durchaus hilfreich. 

Von daher wäre ich froh, wenn du für die Fernbushalte (ich glaube es waren 3) Nürnberg wieder ergänzen könntest. Ob du ZOB ausschreibst oder abkürzt ist dabei zweitrangig. 

Mittlerweile erkläre ich solche Änderungen mittels note=*. 

Edbert

PS: Sorry für die späte Antwort, habe wohl zu lange meine Mails nicht mehr abgerufen.
pyram (2019-01-17 18:58:08+00:00): Ich habe mir schon so etwas gedacht. Aber unabhängig davon, dass es einfach nicht richtig ist, ist die jeweilige Namensergänzung a la "(5)" etc. einfach nur Mapping für den falschen Renderer/für Deine Auswertung. Die Haltestellennummer wird nämlich durchaus richtig dargestellt - ohne dafür den Namen zu verbiegen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.44776/11.08598&layers=TN 
Mit Ortskenntnis kann ich Dir auch sagen, dass die Behauptung in der Fernbusrelation, die Busse würden an bestimmten Haltestellen halten falsch ist (das ist variabel). Zugegebenermaßen lässt sich das aber hier nicht abbilden (oder zumindest kenne ich da keine Möglichkeit).
Den Ortsnamen musst Du halt aus dem Kontext (boundary) ziehen. Weder offiziell, noch vor Ort ist "Nürnberg" Namensbestandteil (official_name=> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5940849 ).
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:30:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
eggie (2018-10-17 07:10:40+00:00): Mocht je aan wandel- en fietsroutes willen sleutelen dan kan dan is editor iD volkomen ongeschikt. De volgorde van de routedelen gaat dan door de war. Met editor JOSM kan het wel en dan nog met een heleboel ervaring. Wat heb je hier precies willen doen?
MVG,
Eggie
dvdhoven (2018-10-17 13:22:09+00:00): Routes zijn door mij weer terug gelegd op de Zaagmolenkade. Zolang dat looppad los ligt, kunnen daar geen routes op liggen. Een route moet doorgaand zijn zonder gaten en verder mag met ID niet aan routes geknutsled worden omdat ID de volgorde in een route volledig verstoord.
Maar eerst moeten er verbindingen naar dat looppad komen. Trapjes, hellingbanen, het kan van alles zijn. Maar buiten kunnen voetgangers toch ook op dat looppad komen, dus die verbindingen kun je gewoon intekenen. Aan losse wegen en paden heeft niemand wat.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 20:27:44+00:00): Kan iemand het pad aan de zaagmolenkade verbinden zoals mij verzocht is? Ik heb puur en alleen het pad aangelegd zoals ik buiten met mijn ogen gezien heb. Aan de uiteinden van het pad ligt gewoon weer normale stoep van steen.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:20:58+00:00): Ik pas wat aan.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:30:45+00:00): Het pad over het water goedgelegd comform de BGT omtrekgericht (landmeetkundige dienst) en verbinding gegeven aan rijbaan. 
bridge=boardwalk en layer= 1 , surface=wood toegevoegd. 
Elk begin is moeilijk. Er wordt je niet kwalijk genomen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-17 07:01:10+00:00): Tip: bridge=boardwalk wellicht erop? 
motor_vehicleen bicycle = no hoeft niet op een voetpad. foot=yes ook niet. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-17 07:20:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
eggie (2018-10-17 07:42:55+00:00): Moet het ook geen verbinding krijgen met de Zaagmolenkade?
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 11:24:45+00:00): Beste eggie, het looppad zoals ik het op de kaart aangebracht heb, ligt qua positie goed. Het ligt op ongeveer 5 meter afstand van de (auto)weg met ertussen parkeerplaatsen. Hoe wil je het precies verbinden met de zaagmolenkade?
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 11:28:27+00:00): Overigens: bridge=broadwalk lijkt me niet verstandig omdat er een oud hikingtraject langs dit pad loopt en het pad zo nu en dan ook bakstenen en bankjes bevat.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 11:34:49+00:00): Ik heb wel de motor_vehicle enzo zoals je zei gecorrigeerd, bedankt.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 11:44:31+00:00): Overigens heb ik net gekeken naar de houten looppaden in het kralingse bos. Ook hier zit geen bridge=boardwalk op. De tag is niet echt nodig denk ik?
eggie (2018-10-17 12:26:47+00:00): Dag Erik.. soms is het schipperen om de routering rond te krijgen. (Soms kun je dat oplossrn door highway=pedestrian en area = yes ertussen te leggen.) Vandaar een verbinding. Een pad door het water is ook niet realistisch vandaar die suggestie van bridge=boardwalk. Up to you. :)
eggie (2018-10-17 13:32:01+00:00): De route is weer hersteld door onze routespecialist, want die was nu onderbroken. Eén van de meest essentiële zaken binnen OSM is de juiste routering. De kaart wordt hier daadwerkelijk voor gebruikt. Liever geen mutaties aan die wandelroutes voordat je precies begrijpt hoe dit werkt en met editor |JOSM kunt omgaan.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710   
een route door het water geeft overigens nog steeds een foutmelding. Soms is het gewoon kiezen voor de beste tags.     
MVG,
Eggie
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-17 20:24:47+00:00): Eggie, 

Is het nu verbonden met de zaagmolenkade zoals je vroeg? Ik weet niet hoe ik dit doe, ik heb enkel een pad aangelegd zoals ik dat met mijn ogen gezien heb in de echte wereld.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:12:56+00:00): Oke.., maar soms is het schipperen. Net als paden die er niet zijn naar busplatform. Die worden dan toch ingetekend. Ik zal even kijken. 
Bedankt voor je reactie.
eggie
eggie (2018-10-18 08:03:24+00:00): aangepast mbv BGT omtrekgericht transparante achtergrond.
Alles is ingemeten in heel Nederland.
. zie feedback op andere changeset.
eggie (2018-10-18 08:05:21+00:00): Overigens wel een nuttige toevoeging, want het pad stond nog niet in OSM. 
Groet,
Eggie
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-24 01:41:17+00:00): Reverted as possible vandalism (fantasy edits)
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:29:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
mueschel (2018-10-27 13:42:20+00:00): Hi,
this tag looks like a mistake, could you explain what you intended to add here?
"name:Zapoteco del Rincón = Retejo Kaj Librejo"
daganzdaanda (2019-03-07 11:27:17+00:00): Hi MapPYOSM Carmen Wendell,
I reverted this changeset since it only added empty nodes with no tags or connection to ways. Please check what went wrong with this import and maybe try again.
(reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67879158 )
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:29:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:29:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:29:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:26:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
chnav (2018-10-18 09:36:54+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста пишите более подробные комментарии к changeset-ам, в которых что-то удаляете. Например "вымышленная велодорожка" или "оптимизация дорожной сети" (когда линии объединяются - один из эземпляров удаляется) и т.д.
Спасибо.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:26:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056573 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
freeExec (2018-10-17 11:41:01+00:00): Откуда вы берёте данные?
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:25:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
sanchi (2018-10-18 09:38:56+00:00): Hola.
Te escribo porque hay una pequeña equivocación en estas ediciones. No es culpa tuya, es desconocimiento. Has movido el trazado de vías erroneamente. Has usado las fotos aéreas de Bing que están mal geolocalizadas y salen movidas. Debes usar las imágenes de PNOA. Actualmente no salen directamente en iD pero aquí te pone como hacer que salga. 
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Usad-imagenes-PNOA-por-favor-td5923015.html

Ten cuidado al modificar cosas que ya están hechas, asegurate que la modificación es correcta.

Cualquier duda puedes escribirme.

Un saludo.
Pachitasabe (2018-10-19 21:08:23+00:00): Muchas gracias por informarme.
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056557 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056539 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056504 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
Glassman (2018-10-17 02:19:19+00:00): You need a tag to classify the business. Like shop=pest_control.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63595768
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-28 02:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75030586, 75028876 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits in Panama.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65389825
Q8ba2di0Pa (2018-10-17 02:26:32+00:00): usage=branch입니다. comment 잘못 올렸어요
daganzdaanda (2019-03-07 11:26:00+00:00): Hi MapPYOSM Carmen Wendell,
 
I reverted this changeset since it only added empty nodes with no tags or connection to ways. Please check what went wrong with this import and maybe try again.
(reverted with  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67878981)
Q8ba2di0Pa (2018-10-17 02:42:05+00:00): 경부선 지선철도가 아니라 그냥 광역철도로 분류되어 있는데 JOSM에서 코멘트 수정하다가 잘못 들어갔네요...
viloan (2018-10-17 03:00:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056484 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
freebeer (2019-01-05 20:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66056763 where the changeset comment is: please do not add fake items to osm, only what really exists
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-17 19:42:49+00:00): landuse areas should be limited to actual landuse, not entire neighborhoods or areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63597025
TravGW (2018-10-18 14:35:01+00:00): Are you sure the sidewalks need to be removed? The wiki says they are fine. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
kre3d (2018-10-18 14:44:01+00:00): These sidewalks were all very short, disconnected segments that weren't routable at all. I just moved them onto the streets using the other tagging scheme mentioned on that page. It's quite a bit easier to maintain that way. All the data is still there.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
GinaroZ (2019-01-07 00:30:01+00:00): Hi, saw your edit of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635156291 - I think the best thing to do when you have a short section where no motor vehicles are allowed is to mark as footway, which I've done.