piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
InfosReseaux (2021-11-01 23:01:50+00:00): Hello

This change from waterway=canal to man_made=pipeline on Grande Dixence tunnels comes to my attention.

According to public documentation, Trift tunnel is an actual canal and not a pipeline.
http://www.grande-dixence.ch/docs/default-source/documentation/brochure-technique/Grande-Dixence-Technische-Dokumentation.pdf?sfvrsn=5

Can you elaborate a bit on what made you think about a pipeline please?

Best regards
Jenseblume (2021-11-02 19:53:56+00:00): Hello,
the reason is the wrong rendering (i know, this should not be the base of changes).
But nice description at your link, thanks a lot. So it's not flooded. I changed it.
What about "Collecteur d'Arolla", it is also waterway=canal?

Thanks
Jens
InfosReseaux (2021-11-02 21:01:34+00:00): Hi Jens and thank you for this answer.
The public documentation is marvelous, we wish we have the same in France!

Yes they are, Trift and Arolla tunnels are flooded tunnels and actual canals (not pressurized, channelized water course)
There is no pipeline involved here, it's pure mountain digging.
You may have some pictures in this video, a car can run inside: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKClqshgy0w&t=120s

In this part of the facility, every tunnel that aren't inverted siphons are tunnels, not pipeline (combining tunnel=* and man_made=pipeline means the pipeline is in the tunnel)

Best regards
user_1566574 (2021-10-30 15:24:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions, cependant pouvez-vous clarifier la présence des objets "type=building" (ex : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981037132) et des chemins sans attributs (ex : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981037126) ?

Je vais corriger, mais c'est étrange...
Merci néanmoins ! :)
olo81 (2021-09-30 16:56:57+00:00): Do poprawy, brak słów :/ 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:leisure=nature_reserve
Nie dodałeś nowego obszaru tylko dokładasz do istniejących terenów nowe tagi
DUGA (2023-01-27 15:29:35+00:00): Y'all better check with each other and make sure no duplicate efforts will be made.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110933061#map=17/41.64535/-75.47347
RoadGeek_MD99 (2021-09-09 01:11:47+00:00): Hey Elliott, Did you mean to remove both the address and building tags or was that OsmAnd Maps?  I see the building is for lease.  Thanks and Happy Mapping, RoadGeek_MD99
ElliottPlack (2021-09-09 01:14:08+00:00): Oops this was supposed to be a note. It is out of business but OsmAnd seems to have made the edit
ElliottPlack (2021-09-09 01:16:11+00:00): Just reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110942674
ElliottPlack (2021-09-09 01:17:53+00:00): And downgraded thanks to ID's friendly button for that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110942706
zstadler (2021-10-02 10:43:13+00:00): Hello TrekClimbing,

Thank you for your contributions!

In this changeset you have entered elevation in feet for the Beacon Hill node - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/747731716

Note that the wiki
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele?uselang=en#Local_units) says:
"It's tempting to enter an elevation with a unit of measure ("3045 feet") but the tag must be in metres"

Rounding to the nearest meter is usually done when converting elevations to meters.

Best regards,
zstadler
TrekClimbing (2021-10-02 11:05:18+00:00): Hi zstadler. I transferred the existing ele tag from the node labelled The Chevin to Beacon Hill. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315910131/history

I wouldn't mind it being in metres but I didn't convert it. I also noticed there seems to be an ongoing discussion about whether this insistence is appropriate since it's not how we treat other measurements https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:ele#Feet_and_inches
J-MUC (2021-09-08 21:20:51+00:00): Comment should have been: Add advertising column (sorry, forgot, and did not realize when triggering the upload, that OsmAnd does not prepopulate the upload comment for object types it does not explicitly support)
hesdrib (2021-09-10 06:42:33+00:00): Le nom des rues (chemin de wanne et chemin de grand halleux ) ne sont pas exact sur Picc
mavl (2021-09-09 03:08:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, перестаньте добавлять названия станций на здании вокзалов по всей стране. Если у вас есть достоверный источник информации о названиях вокзалов, то обсудите предварительно его использование с сообществом. Например, на форуме  
  
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21  
  
Регистрация на форуме не нужна. Используется учётная запись сайта https://www.openstreetmap.org
mariotomo (2021-09-09 01:11:17+00:00): hola … pero borraste los edificios sin preservar la información sobre las actividades asociadas?  ya no están?
porfiriopaiz (2021-09-09 05:55:13+00:00): Hola.

Sí, en este caso asumí que al no estar los los edificios originales, muy posiblemente las actividades asociadas también desaparecieron.

¿Hice mal? De ser así las puedo reestablecer.
mariotomo (2021-09-09 11:18:18+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1b1v
Por la mayoría se trata de edificios que nunca existieron. Jorge Aguirre de Kaart reconoció el error, pero no tienen programado corregirlo.
mariotomo (2021-09-09 11:24:31+00:00): En el 2015 sí existían las actividades. Debería uno revisar si el edificio existe en la forma mapeada por Kaart, o si la actividad sólo ocupa una fracción de edificio.  En el segundo caso, lo más correcto sería mover las etiquetas a uno de los nodos del edificio Kaart, borrar el edificio conservando el nodo etiquetado, eliminar la etiqueta "building" del nodo.
mariotomo (2021-09-09 12:36:28+00:00): sólo mirando a Panamá, casi son 4000 tiendas, restaurantes y otras actividades económicas mapeadas como edificio en ocasión del "Ground Survey".  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1b1z
mariotomo (2021-09-09 12:41:13+00:00): … oops, sorry query errada, llena de falsos positivos!  pero sí te da una idea de la amplitud de la tarea que tenemos como maperos activos en Panamá.
mariotomo (2021-09-09 20:43:37+00:00): P.s. "servicios técnicos" que añadió el edificio externo es un mapero poco atento a la comunicación.
porfiriopaiz (2021-09-10 02:57:52+00:00): He revertido parcialemente los cambios de este changeset.

Reemplacé los polígonos de los edificios por un nodo central en el cual se han fucionado cada uno de los cuatros nodos; he movido las etiquetas a este nodo central.
mariotomo (2021-09-13 18:54:02+00:00): :+1: se ve bien, gracias!
ya estás en el grupo Telegram?
o el foro Panamá?
Jerry_W2k (2021-09-11 08:21:58+00:00): Dodaję zdjęcie z 07.09.2021 budynków z ul. Towarowej, które to budynki zostały niesłusznie usunięte https://i.postimg.cc/YMfPjgxS/20210907-061233.jpg
woodpeck (2021-10-29 12:24:26+00:00): Hallo Lothar2, in diesem Changeset hast Du den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237165078 auf "trail_visibility=horrible" gesetzt. Nun hat jemand anders ihn gelöscht mit der Begründung, er habe nie existiert. Warst Du vor Ort und kannst die Existienz des Weges bekräftigen?
Lothar2 (2021-10-29 20:33:48+00:00): Ja, ich war erst vor wenigen Wochen dort. 
 Wer was geändert hat ist für mich mit ID schwer zu verfolgen, aber so wie es jetzt ist, ist es aktuell definitiv verkehrt.
 Der gelöschte Weg parallel zum "Garage Trail" ist definitiv vorhanden, knapp 3 Meter breit und ein typischer ausgespühlter Naturschotterweg. Früher nannten wir solche Wege im Erzgebirge "Hohlweg".
 Der Andere, oberhalb vom Nonnenfelsen, könnte tatsächlich nie ein offizieller Weg gewesen sein. Habe nur die ersten Meter erkennen können und er stellte sich als verwahrloster Trampelpfad dar. Ich habe an ihm nur die Anbindung zum Hohlweg geändert, da an der ursprünglichen Stelle keinerlei Weg durch das dortige Unterholz führte.
Lothar2 (2021-10-29 20:43:24+00:00): Noch eine Anmerkung zum "Garage Trail". Bei meinem Besuch war dieser "Trail" durch Wald-/Wegearbeiten  blockiert, dürfte aber sicher nicht dauerhaft so bleiben, da er zum offiziellen Trailnetz am Sportzentrum Rabenberg gehört.
Lothar2 (2021-10-29 20:49:02+00:00): Hier noch der Link zum GPS Track des entsprechenden Tages: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lothar2/traces/3810658
mavl (2021-09-09 03:12:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил тег name:ru. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему вы его удалили?  
Это название на русском языке неправильное?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4795398160/history
Кремлёвский штурман (2021-09-09 07:59:03+00:00): Здание вокзала не является станцией и даже его головным зданием, это здание назывеится не иначе как железнодорожный вокзал станции Юктали. Верн7ите мою правку обратно иначе обращусь с жалобой на Вас
mavl (2021-09-09 08:14:32+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
    > Здание вокзала не является станцией и даже его головным зданием  
  
Согласен. Я с этим и не спорил.  
  
    > Верн7ите мою правку обратно  
  
Какую именно правку я должен вернуть?
  
> иначе обращусь с жалобой на Вас  
  
Пожалуйста, обращайтесь с жалобой.
iWowik (2021-09-09 11:43:51+00:00): Лучше таки тегирование обсудить с сообществом
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=840509#p840509
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
CjMalone (2021-09-10 10:24:19+00:00): Hey, just a heads up you can tag empty shops with disused:shop.

See #111016918
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-21 15:58:58+00:00): Hey Gregory,

It seems you forgot to square this building.
In the future, please -continue to- square your buildings.
Otherwise, your edits look fine.

Have fun mapping!

Regards,

Daniel
LivingWithDragons (2021-09-22 13:07:12+00:00): Thanks Daniel, I need to remember that when using iD Editor and teaching people (JOSM is my usual).
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-22 21:21:10+00:00): Just fyi; select an object and press "Q", or right click on it and select 'Square' (square icon).
You can always look in the editor at the help menu in the right sidebar for shortcuts, or go to the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts
iWowik (2021-09-09 09:43:45+00:00): Опять зравствуйте!
Кроме того, что вы не исправляете старые ошибки, о которыйх я вам уже писал тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110707913

Вы творите новые:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746779150/history

Следуйте, пожалуйста, принятым правилам адресов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2

Адрес по населенному пункту вносится тегом addr:place без addr:street, эти теги взаимоисключающие, не подгоняйте данные OSM под использование в каком-то определенно програмном обеспечении.

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
user_12774132 (2021-09-09 10:09:55+00:00): Чисто ради интереса, из какого вы города?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse (2021-09-25 22:41:32+00:00): Hello AlwynWellington,
Andy from the Data Working Group here.  Someone's mentioned to us that you've been deleting access tags here - see http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=722844462 as an example.
By removing these tags are you saying that no-one knows what access is allowed here or even what sort of path it is?  If highway=path is next to useless as a tag on its own; if it really is a shared access cycleway then highway=cycleway; foot=yes; bicycle=yes or similar would make sense.
Best Regards,
Andy
AlwynWellington (2021-10-13 02:18:12+00:00): You have a semi-technical advantage over me.

I do not have the knowledge to find the id for an element, such as "id=722844462" in the example above.

I say again, I have not deleted allowed access tags.  In the present examples I have been reverting to the standard allowed access for the highway=???.  This is intended to be the same as allowed access as when a line is given "life" as in "highway=track"

1) Please demonstrate how I can find the id for an element

2) please discuss the proposal in my last message for a shared path highway type that recognises the width of 2 to 3 metres, usually paved, typically has "pedestrian priority" (or similar) signage.
I suggested a wider line and new colour recognising a sharing.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-13 07:59:22+00:00): Sorry - should have been clearer.  http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=722844462 is OSM way 722844462 , which is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722844462 .  From the "mapki.com" link you can see who changed it and when, and can click through for more details about each changeset.  At the top you can see the tags that changed, and further down you can see any nodes in this way that might have changed.  There are similar pages for nodes (e.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2594590756 ) and relations.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-13 08:08:55+00:00): So on the specifics, according to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=722844462 in changesets http://osm.org/browse/changeset/76933663 , http://osm.org/browse/changeset/110392567 and http://osm.org/browse/changeset/110939910 you did remove access tags.
On its own, a "highway=path" tag does not say anything about who has the legal right to use it or how appropriate it is for that mode of transport.  A "foot=designated" tag with "highway=path" means "this path was designed for use for people on foot"; similarly a "bicycle=designated" tag means "this path was designed for use for people on bicycle".  Without tags that explain who can use a highway=path , everyone's guessing.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-13 08:13:07+00:00): Looking at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=567640 (which is all the changesets on which you have commented) this does appear to be at least the third time that you've had this conversation with people.
Can you link to "the proposal in my last message for a shared path highway type" though?  It's not obvious which one it is.
With regard to extra information like width - you can add that as an explicit "width" tag.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-13 08:16:57+00:00): On the subject of "I suggested a wider line and new colour recognising a sharing" it's worth mentioning that there are many, many representations of OSM data - there are 6 now on openstreetmap.org itself, and many more elsewhere.
If you want to suggest a change to how one of those displays things you'll need to explicitly make that suggestion to whichever project maintains that map rendering.
There are other uses (foot routers, cycle routers etc.) that don't have a map display associated with them - for those you'll want to ensure that all tags including access are set correctly so that they know what they can route along a particular OSM way.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-13 08:20:54+00:00): Finally it's worth mentioning that there's a very similar discussion going on across the Tasman about cycle access on footpaths in Victoria: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-October/thread.html#15062 .  There (but not in many other AU states) the legal right of access of cyclists on footpaths is apparently "it's complicated".
I've no idea where the equivalent place for the NZ community to discuss would be - https://openstreetmap.community/ suggests https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz , but that doesn't seem very busy.
ovruni (2021-09-08 22:25:18+00:00): Hola JBal, he modificado las etiquetas en este conjunto de cambios ya que el uso de building se encuentra destinado para edificios y algunas de estas áreas parecen contener alguna edificación en su interior, mas no ser toda el área un edificio (una casa podría tener varios edificios dentro). Por otra parte, el uso de la etiqueta "addr:neighbourhood" se encuentra destinado para el barrio en caso hubiese (no es para la manzana), el "addr:housenumber" es para el número de puerta, el cual suele ser un número diferente con las otras casas de la misma calle, algunas veces a un lado de la calles los números parea y el otro lado impar, el "addr:city" para la ciudad en caso un edificio quede dentro de una ciudad.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-09-08 22:43:10+00:00): También he agregado un nodo de manzana "place=city_block" (si conoce el área que abarca la manzana puede reemplazarlo por un área), además he agregado la etiqueta "addr:block" a cada una de las vías de este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
eteb3 (2021-10-04 18:34:57+00:00): Just a quick note to say that "Shahjal" mosque" is almost certainly "Shah Jalal" mosque. As I recall from the excellent YouTube video the letters were falling off the sign, but it also declared itself as a Bangladeshi outfit: Shah Jalal is the man credited with bringing Islam to Bangladesh, and a huge number of Bangladeshi-run mosques take his name. (Off-topic for mappers, but there's a write-up for those interested here: https://sacredsites.com/asia/bangladesh/hazrat_shah_jalal_sylhet.html)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Henosb (2021-09-13 20:20:28+00:00): Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-06-16
kukułka (2021-09-11 10:12:35+00:00): Cześć. 
w sprawie Księżej była już dyskusja → patrz Zestaw zmian #59885329. Ustaliliśmy, że tag "pedestrian" jest tutaj najwłaściwszy. Jej wykonanie i zaznaczenie w realu jest inne niż reszta chodników tego parku. Proszę o wycofanie Twojej zmiany.
czebureks (2021-09-12 17:45:38+00:00): Cześć!
Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Zmieniłem z powrotem na "pedestrian".
txemt (2022-03-02 00:51:34+00:00): How sure are you of the toll gantries at this location? I ask only because there's a toll gantry south of Caldwell Lane. I've never seen two toll gantries right next to each other on a toll road. The SATIMG that I'm looking at clearly shows the gantry south of Caldwell Lane as of Feb 2020. I also did a quick GMSV which also confirms the location of the gantry south of Caldwell Lane. I cannot find any reference for a gantry at the old toll plaza, however. Not in SATIMG, not in GMSV, not on SunPass's website, nowhere.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Frans S (2021-09-16 15:26:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
How to map tall buildings

Are you aware how tall buildings have to be mapped and positioned on their footprints? In the centre of some cities are rather tall buildings which are bad mapped and not shifted to their footprint.  I’ve consulted Russel Deffner about this issues. He asked to pay attention to that so validators are  going to correct these mappings or invalidate those tasks where there are wrong mapped and ask you mappers to redraw them according to the method shown in the video (see link ) I will refer to a Youtube video of Bigardot where he explains how to map these.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs

This video is made for JOSM, but in ID editor you can use it as well. Best regards
gyotoku810 (2021-09-09 12:01:37+00:00): 東京高速道路は一般自動車道であり、自動車専用標識はありません。日本におけるmotorwayの基準は自動車専用標識があることであり、本来ここはmotorwayではありません。しかし現在これらの道路の扱いについては議論中であるため、当編集を即差し戻すわけではありませんが、今後変更される可能性をご承知おきください。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_JapanTagging/RoadTypes/motorroad
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging
ovruni (2021-09-09 04:02:21+00:00): Hola , para los mercados existe la etiqueta amenity=marketplace [0] Los horarios de apertura no deben de contener am/pm, puede tener mayor información en la wiki [1].
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:opening_hours
ElliottPlack (2021-09-09 01:16:17+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110938331#map=19/39.39746/-76.56837
ovruni (2021-09-09 04:04:10+00:00): Hola, aquí le dejo información sobre las iglesias [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
matheusgomesms (2021-09-09 22:15:26+00:00): Oi Lucas, seja bem-vindo à comunidade OSM!

Espero que se divirta bastante por aqui!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, não hesite em me contatar ou alguém da comunidade. A comunidade cearense tem um grupo no Telegram, onde discutimos dicas e falamos coisas relacionadas ao OSM. Você é bem-vindo lá também: https://t.me/osmce

Att,
Matheus
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 06:28:32+00:00): partial revert Changeset #112599055
 Changeset #112598930
ff5722 (2021-09-22 09:08:57+00:00): This section hasn't been opened yet https://www.163.com/dy/article/GEDK44PL0514CRTF.html
trigpoint (2022-02-18 08:10:09+00:00): Hi, this is not a charity shop, why did you change it?

Cheers Phil
Adamant1 (2022-02-19 00:55:07+00:00): Five months ago is a pretty long time to remember. Although I do research on things before I changed them. So I'm sure there was a reason. That said, originally it was tagged as shop=thrift. Both that and shop=charity make a lot more sense then shop=recycle. Whatever nonsense that is. I don't see how changing it to a tag with only 7 uses that doesn't make any sense while taking issue with me changing it to shop=charity is really helpful. If anything it should be changed back to shop=thrift if it's not a charity shop. Although, like I said I'm sure there was a good reason I changed it originally.
Adamant1 (2022-02-19 01:01:08+00:00): So I looked at their Facebook/Website and they sound like a charity shop. Especially going by the definition given for one on the Wiki. So what's your specific with it being tagged as one, how does your disagreement related to the definition in the Wiki article, and how is that my issue when I'm simply going by what the Wiki says a charity shop is which fits this?
Adamant1 (2022-02-19 01:06:20+00:00): For that matter shop=art would be 100 times more descriptive then shop=recycle if you just have something in your craw about shop=charity for some reason. Personally, I could go with either shop=charity or shop=art.
st1974 (2021-09-09 03:52:12+00:00): Der Haustyp der Häuser zwischen Paprikastraße und Lorbeerstraße war beim Datensammeln mit StreetComplete schwer festzulegen. Die Häuser sind vom äußeren Anschein her wie Reihenhäuser. Viele davon haben aber 2-3 Wohnungen. Ich fand aber weder house noch appartments passend. Daher habe ich sie nachträglich allgemeiner als residential klassifiziert.
DP24PH (2021-09-14 02:41:12+00:00): NOTE from DP24: Dagupan City is an independent component city wherein the provincial boundary of Pangasinan does not include the said city. Likewise, it only proved by its own legislative district representation.
mavl (2021-09-10 15:24:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы загрузили линии без тегов поверх других таких же линий без тегов, которые вы загрузили 1 сентября 2021 года?  
  
Удалите, пожалуйста, дубликаты, которые вы загрузили.