piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adam Martin (2019-12-30 14:51:54+00:00): Quick update - in trying to return these to 'Stop', iD editor is adamant that the tag is outdated.  According to the Public_Transport webpage on the wiki, Stop_position is used on lines where the vehicle stops, but "Stop" is no longer used at all.  Instead, "Station" is preferred for points like these.  Not sure which way to go with it.  Since these areas already have stop positions correctly positioned on the ways making up the rails, perhaps the tag should be removed as redundant from this point?
azakh-world (2019-12-30 15:07:13+00:00): Adam, happy NY!

There were no problems with public_transport=stop_position nodes. The issue is with **relations** of type=public_transport. See link to one of them in the first comment. They should be tagged public_transport=stop_area, not public_transport=station.
It seems editor suggests confuse you yet more. You may relax, I'll fix it.

Cheers!
Adam Martin (2019-12-30 15:49:29+00:00): Ahhh. I see I see.  iD ain't the smartest with relations. Thanks for the help!

Adam
John Grubb (2019-12-30 02:09:02+00:00): I must be all mapped-out! Can't decide whether to bog-standard map this or go for the "total landuse mapping" concept I've been toying with elsewhere on this section (scroll NW to Sweet Chestnut et al to get the idea, right down to kerbstones).
camelCaseNick (2019-12-30 04:44:31+00:00): Hey,
could please provide further detail in your changeset comments, something that may help others to understand and verify what you have done, and fill out the changeset source field.

Without any source and an "-" or "update" I and others won't be able to understand, why you think this building, which was added just three months ago, needs to be deleted.

CamelCaseNick
Carnildo (2020-01-02 01:50:15+00:00): Cheney?  I think your aim's a bit off.
Mudumala (2022-04-29 10:38:11+00:00): Thanks for the edit
Kovoschiz (2019-12-30 09:08:18+00:00): `highway=disused` is not widely accepted, and is not conceptually correct. Use construction or temporary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79001258
Xavier Fung (2019-12-30 12:14:26+00:00): Does not agree that disused is not widely accepted, and conceptually disused means "not currently available for use" in the OSM wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

It is not known whether the current construction work around that slip road would mean temporary closure or complete removal (see last page: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr17-18/chinese/fc/pwsc/papers/p17-22c.pdf), so I would still mark it as disused for now.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-31 18:52:09+00:00): 1. Prefix is not tag value. You also missed "but could be reinstated easily". If you don't know the impact of construction, why would you think it "could be reinstated easily"? 
2. Yes, it is exactly a construction work. Disused means absolutely no one is touching it, which includes construction workers. If construction work is going around, it is being "used", regardless of its condition as completed before or being constructed.
trigpoint (2019-12-30 12:56:20+00:00): Hi, I would be very interested to see the evidence you used to map way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50640363 :)

Cheers Phil
bibasra (2019-12-30 14:09:14+00:00): Hi trigpoint.

Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake. made the necessary changes as per the latest information. Refer the changeset (79016883) for the modification done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
bibasra.
trigpoint (2019-12-30 16:34:54+00:00): Thank you
luschi (2020-01-02 16:27:47+00:00): Hi skyguide-m,     
you made a lot of buldings here arround, but none of them are made rectangular.     
I think in Georgia the buildings are rectangular.  

You can do this in Merkaartor by clicking in the "Axis Aling" and then set 4 to make the building rectangular.     
Or you use the iD-Editor on osm.org

Also is it not necessary to ad to all building the add:country, because the boundary of Georgia is enough to detect that this buildings are in Georgia.

also you should not use addr:country=Georgia     
For Georgia you should use GE     
For Russia you should use RU     
For Japan you should use JP     
etc.

regards     
luschi
skyguide-m (2020-01-02 22:36:59+00:00): Thank you for your comments. 
I do want to ask... in this mountain region of Georgia, its a common to have a none-standard shape of a buildings. They are mostly village type houses. Often they are re-constructed over time, parts and sections of the building added, causing a rather irregular building shapes. 

The quality of the satellite images are not high enough to always been able to 'see' all corners of the building, so I do my best to draw the shape as close as possible to actual building shadow. 

Some of those building I can see clearly when I drive pass on the highway, but most are hidden in a treeline. 

Thank you for advising me regarding meta-date tagging. Could you let me know if I should go back and re-edit country of origin to GE? Please let me know. 

As far as using features of  Merkaartor - Axis Aling, I want to clarify... is it preferable to have a prefect rectangular shape of the building even tho it would not reflect actual, real shape of a building? 
Please let me know... this is new to me and I would appreciate your advise and guidance. 

Thank you.
luschi (2020-01-03 00:10:56+00:00): I fixed/deleted the addr:country added from you and made some of the building rectangular.    

If you know the complete address(number, streetname, city, postcode, etc.) you can add them, but addr:country should not mapped alone without other addr

If the buildings are not rectangular in reality, you should not make them rectangular here on OSM.

One of the important rules in OSM is to map thinks how they are in reality.    
If a building is round, you should add id round.     
If a building have 5 angles, you should add it with 5 angles maybe not rectangular.

You can check the OSM-Wiki to find how to add some different things into OSM.     
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building     

I startet in OSM also with adding building in my country, but there is a lot of more stuff you can add.

regards     
luschi

PS: if you have questions in the future, you can contact me by PM.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-06 20:30:33+00:00): For info, access=private is correct on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759521984/history .  Access to the stables is signed from the east, but not from the south (there are signs suggesting that people don't drive in from the south)
richard23 (2020-10-06 23:01:53+00:00): Schauen sie sich bitte mal im Wiki die Verwendung des Tags "access" an. Sie benutzen das recht konsequent falsch.
Gruß, Dirk
Martinummo (2020-11-01 17:05:22+00:00): Hallo Dirk, danke für den Hinweis. 
Es geht um den Feld-/Waldweg südwestlich des Büffelhofes, korrekt? Mein Fehler, war, dass ich access=private in Kombination mit bicycle=yes und foot=yes eingegeben habe, korrekt? Das widerspricht sich natürlich! 
Ursache hierfür ist die Abfragemaske im iD-Editor für das Themenfeld "Erlaubter Zugang". Auch bei unterschiedlichen Zugangsberechtigungen habe ich dort immer auch die Abfrage für access beantwortet ...
Sollte noch was falsch sein, bitte melden!
Viele Grüße Martin
richard23 (2020-11-06 12:11:05+00:00): Hallo,
ja genau das ist falsch. Einige Editoren und Apps scheinen diese Verwendung wohl "nahezulegen". Zumindest bei id werde ich aber nicht wirklich dazu genötigt, so zu taggen. Access ist hierarchisch aufgebaut, doof ist das die Grundbezeichnung "access" des Themas/keys gleich dem obersten Schlüssel von der Bezeichnung her entspricht. Bei potlach nennen sie es etwas konsequenter "general access" oder so ähnlich. Kurz: Das namentliche tag "access" gilt immer für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer, also z.b. auf Privatgrundstücken, Firmengeländen, Militärgeländen, in Naturschutzgebieten...

Was man nicht macht: Alle verbieten und dann wieder Einzelne erlauben.  Gilt auch für weitere hierarchisch höherstehende tags, wie z.B. alle KFZ verbieten und dann wieder mehrspurige erlauben um die Motorräder auszuschließen. Da kann man von oben herab  ganze Ketten aus verboten/erlaubt bilden, die "mathematisch" korrekt sind, aber überflüssig, fehleranfällig und kaum noch auswertbar sind. I.d.R. werden nur die Einschränkungen einzelner Verkehrsteilnehmer entgegen den für den highwaytyp üblichen Erlaubnisse getagt. Wobei es bezüglich "überflüssiger" Erlaubnisse trotzdem taggen, wohl unterschiedliche Standpunkte in der "Gemeinde" gibt, genauso für Verbote wo es eigentlich klar ist. Natürlich ist foot=no für die Autobahn richtig. Dann aber auch horse und wheelchair... Auf Feldwegen ist foot und Fahrrad per default und in der Realität erlaubt, braucht man also nicht mehr extra taggen. 
Problem der Verwendung des toplevel-tags "access" ist, das in der osm Standardkarte diese Wege richtiger weise ausgegraut werden, da sie quasi für niemanden von Belang sind. Auch werten diverse Router nichts mehr aus, wenn das toplevel "access" gesetzt ist. Auch bei der Generierung von Karten für Garmin aus osm sind theoretisch mögliche Mehrfachverschachtelungen praktisch nicht mehr auswertbar. 
Der deutsche Wikiartikel beschreibt die Hierarchie recht eindeutig, der englische leider gar nicht.
Galt für diverse Wege hier in der Ecke. Wo du sonst noch unterwegs warst, weiß ich nicht.
Gruß, Dirk
Martinummo (2020-11-08 18:22:38+00:00): Danke Dirk, für die ausführliche Antwort! Jetzt möchte ich natürlich meine anderen fehlerhaften Einträge entsprechend ändern. Hast Du einen Tipp für eine automatisierte Abfrage zu eigenen Einträgen mit dem Filter auf "Access"?
Viele Grüße, Martin
richard23 (2020-11-15 20:02:15+00:00): Sorry für die späte Antwort: Ne, habe keine Ahnung bezügl. automatisierter Abfragen.Im Forum nutzen viele "overpass", aber keine Ahnung wie das funktioniert und ob man das auf eigene Änderungen beschränken kann. Ggf. mal im Forum danach suchen.
Gruß, Dirk
Supaplex (2020-01-03 14:55:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
VLD159 (2021-02-16 19:54:59+00:00): Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I noticed that a highway=path tag was used in your edit. For example, Way 755947390 located at 33.633684816586, 46.40767603196235. Based on what I saw in the available imagery sets, this should be a continuation of the highway=secondary road network (Way: 759529999 located at 33.632752672700946, 46.40808562249748) from the area South of your edit. The road network should also connect to the greater road network that is North of your edit at coordinates.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony
Supaplex (2020-01-03 14:55:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Harald Hartmann (2019-12-31 08:25:35+00:00): Hallo usjbka.
Vor zwei Tagen hast du mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78966373 einen Spielplatz-Node (Punkt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7091010156) hinzugefügt. 
Jetzt mit diesem Änderungssatz hast du auch die Fläche als Spielplatz deklariert. Hier bitte ich dich, dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element anzuschauen.
Vor Ort dürfte ja nur EIN Spielplatz sein, nach deinen Änderungen sind es jetzt aber mehr oder weniger ZWEI an gleicher Stelle.
Oder ist das dem Spielplatz umschließende Areal vielleicht eher ein "Park" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark)?
Viele Grüße aus dem Schleusegrund, Harald Hartmann
ualios (2022-12-19 16:28:11+00:00): Ciao vrmap, il percorso intorno al parcheggio è mappato come rotatoria tranne questo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759147922.
vrmap (2022-12-20 09:15:02+00:00): Ciao, ho risolto l'errore.
user_5359 (2019-12-31 07:15:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Könntest Du bitte auch prüfen, ob der Container Glas (also auch Glasscheiben, recycling:glass) oder "nur" Flachen (recycling:glass_bottle) annimmt?
Djoga'Ro (2019-12-31 07:30:51+00:00): Danke.
Ich wohne nicht selbst in der Gegend und komme an dieser Ecke normalerweise nicht vorbei, aber ich versuche daran zu denken bei Gelegenheit nachzusehen.
user_5359 (2019-12-31 07:32:26+00:00): Kein Problem es gibt bestimmt noch mehr Container mit dieser Problematik in Deiner Wohngegend :). 
Noch viel Spaß mit OSM!
Supaplex (2020-01-03 14:56:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DP24PH (2019-12-30 11:26:45+00:00): This includes recalibration of all bus routes via Dasmarinas City upon request from @TagaSanPedroAko. This changeset may subject to change from time to time without any notice.
JochenOSM (2019-12-30 09:15:13+00:00): Hallo schwing,
ist es ok für dich in und um Miltenberg foot=designated vorerst dran zu lassen? Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67910
trigpoint (2019-12-30 12:41:45+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong, you have deleted and not replaced surveyed imformation.

Most importantly you have simply deleted Coracle Close, which had been added by a local mapper by going and having a look. 

Whilst it wasn't perfectly mapped, it was not wrong and was added before aerial imagery was available. It was good enough to find Coracle Close. You have now thrown that information away, by deleting  rather than improving on it.

Cheers Phil
hvannere (2019-12-30 13:47:12+00:00): Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for looking into my edit. As per the latest aerial image and the private aerial image(Digital Globe) the road added doesn't exists. Hence deleted the road and didnt add the road name to the new added road as there is no proper evidence from the street view. Could you please suggest if the same road name(Coracle Close) can be added as per the local knowledge. So, that the necessary changes can be made.

Thanks in advance,
hvannere.
trigpoint (2019-12-30 15:26:17+00:00): This is a new development, it was only built about a year ago, street names do not change and it is fairly obvious that the original mapper had the location slightly wrong. Maybe he only knew it was just off the roundabout by the Shrewsbury Club.

It is 100% Coracle Close

Cheers Phil
hvannere (2019-12-31 06:12:58+00:00): Hi trigpoint,

Made the necessary changes. Please refer the changeset(79042965) for the modifications done.

Regards,
hvannere.
Correcaminos604 (2019-12-30 11:13:37+00:00): There is a light train (https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Addis_Ababa_Light_Rail) which might be considered as a subway/metro (line within the city with a lot of station and parts that are underground).
I would keep the subway entrances or trainstation entrance
self (2019-12-30 20:24:09+00:00): Yes you are right. But i did not see a Station nearby. And if there is, it should be added to a station relation.

Is there really such an entrance to the light rail?
Correcaminos604 (2019-12-31 11:42:47+00:00): If I remember correctly, this is one of the entrance. There are several entrances on the roundabout just to the north and for me all this is the same underground station of "Menelik II Square", the present terminus of the line. I am far away and cannot verify anymore, I did try to observe and complete the map with as much details as possible but there is still a lot to do in Ethiopia.
self (2019-12-31 14:36:24+00:00): Alright, we will try to put together a station relation with the entrances here in collaboration with the local staff :) Thanks your for efforts! Have a great new year.
pangoSE (2020-01-01 11:29:31+00:00): Hej, försök gärna spara noder om det går. Flytta hellre än att radera och rita om. Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
frosm (2020-01-01 23:11:36+00:00): bonjour,
pourriez-vous renseigner la source sur le changeset ?
par ailleurs, chargez-vous la zone et tenez compte des erreurs signalés par le validateurs ?
il y a 13 erreurs dans les modifs de batiments, principalement des batiments dont le contour fait une intersection et des bouts de way http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Lucinux85500?level=1
Polarbear-repair (2019-12-31 15:29:43+00:00): Dear Dominik Pych, it seems you were trying to fix errors from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78964056, however in order to revert them completely I had to roll back this CS as well. 
Please kindly check the objects again.  
 
This changeset has been reverted in
Changeset: 79060884 for technical reasons:
PL: DWG revert of CS 79007598 78964992 78964209 for conflict resolving while reverting 78964056 for fixing vandalism/fiction by new user in 78964056
user_5359 (2019-12-31 07:47:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the highway https://www.osm.org/way/205502756. What is the meaning of 30=50?
Bonjour ! Veuillez jeter un coup d'oeil sur la rue https://www.osm.org/way/205502756. Quelle est la signification de 30=50 ?
simon_geovelo (2019-12-31 10:05:33+00:00): Sorry for the mistake. I change the key instead of the value.
ndm (2019-12-30 10:31:15+00:00): I've removed the service road that doesn't exist you added to McDonalds - you should be able to see that on Bing Streetside.

Surely customers need to have access to Toyota.
rkkapilk (2019-12-30 13:51:19+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thanks for reviewing my edit. It was an honest mistake. Will take this as learning and use for the further edits.Please let me know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
rkkapilk.
s8evq (2020-01-08 11:40:22+00:00): Hi Beardhatcode,
What's the advantage of place=city_block? Currently, we already have amenity=university on that are. It's either a city block or a university ground. I think it's rather the second, no?
useredf816343045912f6 (2020-01-10 16:33:55+00:00): You are right. I reverted my change.
Leo Slager (2020-01-20 23:33:40+00:00): dag Jaap,
Daar denkt een plaatselijke waarnemer anders over.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2063251
Het lijkt mij beter om dit deel op construction te laten staan. Ook op de meest recente satellietbeelden is duidelijk te zien dat er geen doorgaande weg is.
jaap de vries (2020-01-21 06:43:35+00:00): Beste Leo,

Laatst ben ik hier nog geweest, toen kwam meneer ook al woest naar buiten gestormd, hij wil geen weg hier. Maarja de gemeente denkt er anders over.
Het betreft een ontsluitingsweg net zoals bij de Helmteken nr5 met aan weerzijde 5 parkeervakken. De weg is allang open voor alle gebruik. Zie ook Pdok.
En handig dat er luchtfoto's zijn maar enkel daarvan uitgaan is niet handig, wat je ziet op de grond is beter.
Leo Slager (2020-01-21 11:28:55+00:00): Dag Jaap,
Dan ben je me voor geweest met een bezoek ter plaatse. Een rondje Brabant had ik pas weer de volgende maand gepland. Dank voor je reactie.
frosm (2019-12-30 11:06:48+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
l'immeuble a été détruit ? car vous l'avez supprimer pour renseigner que cette surface est utilisée pour un espace commercial.
qu'est-ce qui se trouve exactement à cet endroit ? une librairie + les bureaux d'une maison d'édition ?
je vous invite à expérimenter le tutoriel pour découvrir les bases
bonne conitnuation
Classiques Garnier (2019-12-30 11:16:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci. 

Il s'agit peut-être d'une mauvaise manipulation de ma part. En effet, il s'agit de la librairie des éditions Classiques Garnier. J'ai voulu apporter cette modification car OpenStreetMap la situe en Haïti.

Bien à vous,
Laurent
SHARCRASH (2020-02-04 15:41:22+00:00): Hello! Please, respect the tag's definition! See OSM's wiki for details. Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360152771/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97672781/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759559499/history

Also if you add features which involve a side (kerbs, cliffs, retaining walls, embankments...) respect the direction of the way. Normally lowest side has extra drawing on one side of the line, not always rendered, so if you follow the direction of a way, right side is always lowest. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755143836/history
AVL_FLI_KA (2020-02-04 16:34:35+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your comments and corrections. For the first two changesets, I adjusted just the lines to the borders of the footways or roads. I didn't pay attention to the tags made from other users, but you are right, I had to. I didn't know the village_green tag before, sorry.
For the kerbs and retaining walls I will pay more attention in future to respect the lower and higher part. I didn't read about this specs.

Seeing forward hearing from you

Kai
Leo Slager (2020-01-12 00:03:19+00:00): Hi Sint E7,
Kun je in het forum aangeven waarom je bus=yes en name=* verwijderd van de stop_position. ?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=34039&p=18
tkk (2020-01-06 14:11:49+00:00): Ahoj, bylo by fajn, používat alespoň trochu výstižnější popis sady změn než "jiné". Ostatním to výrazně pomůže se v tvých změnách zorientovat.

Díky
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-12-30 11:26:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 78395740, 78396539, 78572318, 78572459, 78574619, 78993522.
user_5359 (2019-12-31 07:44:32+00:00): Hello! Again: What ist the meaning of the tag 4981848952 = dhoni007 on https://www.osm.org/node/1682637141.
drnoble (2019-12-30 19:41:00+00:00): I presume you didn't mean to tag the printmakers as a cafe. Maybe craft=printmaker and possibly something else?
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-30 15:38:03+00:00): Hallo Rastelli60, willkommen bei OSM.

Haben die Hochsitze wirklich einen Namen oder wird hier lediglich das name-Tag zur Beschreibung der Art des Hochsitzes verwendet?

Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-30 16:59:05+00:00): You should check your JOSM settings in particular the source value.
TeXnicer (2019-12-31 10:44:15+00:00): To be honest, this one was derived from a free aerial image in conjunction with a guy knowing the location.
Anyways, will revert and thanks for the hint for the sandbox. This was what I was looking for and never knew.
kartonage (2019-12-30 13:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 79014412 for the following reason: vandalism for Pokemon Go