piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-28 15:36:38+00:00): 朋友你好

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

注意到您近日作出了不少编辑，但都仅仅用一个字母作为变更集注释。这对其他朋友理解您做出了什么更改没有任何帮助。还望您能用简短明了的语言描述每个changeset包含什么，感谢您的理解。

快乐的老鼠宝宝 作为OSMChina的一员自豪的敬上
LockOnGuy (2022-08-16 00:50:59+00:00): again, why did you delete the Arabic names?
gscholz (2022-08-01 05:19:51+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.39411&lat=-26.87785&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points

Obviously you have tried to add public transport routes. You did this by adding only one self intersecting line and not as a sequence of all used streets as it is required. Can you please educate yourself about this topic to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-07 05:45:08+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki, ,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-20 06:59:54+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Hans Thompson (2022-07-28 17:45:10+00:00): Very cool to micromap the botanical garden. Great edit!
mycota (2022-07-28 19:18:43+00:00): Thanks! I love mapping public gardens. A well-done OSM map is usually better than the maps provided by the gardens. I’ll be adding trails and other big features once I get to a computer.
Supaplex (2022-07-28 05:53:56+00:00): 德安百貨那棟沒拆掉吧？那應該還是保留建築相關的標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124163297
nfx2851 (2022-07-29 04:04:21+00:00): 感謝修正
yellowsoar (2022-08-23 13:42:23+00:00): lost building parts...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682186424/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682186426
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682186425
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682186425
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997319641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682186427
Lancelotance (2022-07-28 03:01:09+00:00): source: http://www.jiangyong.gov.cn/jyjtj/0300/202207/4f5b7319bf51416396982eb7a71d596a.shtml
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:31:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9916157332/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
vichada (2025-12-21 07:51:48+00:00): I actually don't see a reason for the fixme=yes ...
In the currently available imagery, it looks no more or less "uncertain" than many of the objects mapped in the area...
Warin61 (2022-07-29 00:29:22+00:00): Hi,
Use the DCS Base Map for boundaries. 

As this is a 'new' admin boundary? then it wont be there - just put source=estimated on the boundaries your not certain of. The next update should have them.
Kovoschiz (2022-07-28 07:33:25+00:00): `via=` is not for roads. It's not for all places it pass through either. It should be for places advertised only.
Kovoschiz (2022-07-28 07:35:26+00:00): R33 already exists in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6928194 which should be modified. You duplicated the two.
adrianojbr (2022-07-28 15:46:33+00:00): Olá, alan_grunitzki. Muito boa a iniciativa de incluir as rotas de transporte público.

Para melhorar, sugiro adicionar as linhas das vias em vez de criar novas linhas sobrepostas às vias.

Nesse vídeo, há uma boa sugestão do método: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPvIGCfrrBo&t=336s (apesar de eu discordar de algumas tags usadas na relação, em especial o papel dos membros, pois não achei referência na wiki).

Abraço!
pza (2022-07-28 04:50:23+00:00): Note that there are certainly some valid building tag improvements undone by this revert that could be reinstated, but they need to be re-checked, as there are many incorrect ones in there as well.
Warin61 (2023-06-01 09:17:49+00:00): Ken Done gallery restored tag as tourism=gallery ... but removed it from the building and now is a simple node.
nyampire (2022-07-28 05:38:27+00:00): OSMへようこそ！ 編集レビューのリクエストがありましたので、いくつか見てみました。
いくつか、フィードバックさせてください。

まず、全体的によく描けていると思います。
特に、地理院地図（航空写真）の背景画像を選択したことはとても素晴らしい選択です。特に都市部では、位置精度が高く、頼りになる画像です。どんどん使ってゆきましょう。

そして、建物を描く際にはiDエディタでオブジェクトを選択した状態でQキーを押したり、右クリックのメニューから「直交化」を押して、建物の角を四角にすることをお勧めします。
大学の建物など大きな建物は曲線もあるのですべて一概ではありませんが、多くの場合で役に立つでしょう。

それから、道路の交差点ですが、複雑な箇所は描くのがとても大変で、コツが必要です。まずは他の交差点などで感覚を掴んでから編集されると良いかもしれません。
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/jp/mapping-common-features/

これからもマッピングを楽しんでください。
Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124164334
SCHLUMPFs (2022-08-18 11:58:23+00:00): bad edit :(
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 14:51:46+00:00): Los puntos personales que creó se han eliminado, agregue solo puntos de relevancia pública. Agrega los nombres.
gscholz (2022-07-29 05:26:39+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.39411&lat=-26.87785&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points

Obviously you have tried to add public transport routes. You did this by adding only one self intersecting line and not as a sequence of all used streets as it is required. Can you please educate yourself about this topic to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-06 06:57:39+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki, 
these errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-15 06:12:24+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki,
these errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-28 04:45:44+00:00): edit was manually reviewed - and found https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3286787 - looks like a mistaken edit and probably tram track should be restored there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
hanchao (2022-07-31 12:06:34+00:00): 不要破坏数据，已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124300662
emersonveenstra (2022-07-28 10:30:52+00:00): Hi,

You shouldn't put the name on both the building and the point, just the point is sufficient
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124166043
tastrax (2022-08-02 23:57:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mrpulley (2022-08-20 13:25:07+00:00): Just letting you know that I've unconnected Dairy Creek Road from the Mitchell Highway. This section of road was closed when the new intersection for the Southern Feeder Road was opened.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-28 10:29:26+00:00): Hi,

Please don't attach buildings to sidewalks, it makes it more difficult to adjust later
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124167022
mapper175 (2022-08-03 21:41:00+00:00): Also, 1) the building was already on the map in a way that aligned with imagery, and 2) there was already an existing point for the restaurant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124167022
gscholz (2022-07-29 05:26:43+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.39411&lat=-26.87785&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points

Obviously you have tried to add public transport routes. You did this by adding only one self intersecting line and not as a sequence of all used streets as it is required. Can you please educate yourself about this topic to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-19 06:32:52+00:00): Hi alan_grunitzki, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
InfosReseaux (2022-09-05 14:54:41+00:00): Hello

Thank you for your modification.
I feel uncertain about building=yes => man_made=works. Osmcha flag them as invalid modification
https://osmcha.org/changesets/124167457/

building=industrial would be more suitable for those caverns?
man_made=works is dedicated to good production aren't you?

Best regards
Halbtax (2022-10-04 23:31:27+00:00): Hello

I think most of us associate the term building with an above-ground structure (see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building). The tag building was created on the basis of this assumption (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings). When you find something with this tag on the map, you expect to see something with walls and a roof on the surface of the earth. If we represent a cavern in the same way, it is rather irritating or even misleading for most users. 

OSMCha flags this change assuming that it is a building and not a cavern. Unfortunately, OSMCha knows nothing about the situation on site. 

The tag man_made is exactly intended to tag structures that are not buildings. I agree with you, man_made=works is not really accurate. man_made=cavern would probably be more appropriate. It's not used much yet, but probably only because caverns haven't been tagged much.

Best regards
InfosReseaux (2022-10-05 10:31:26+00:00): Hello

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings mentions location=underground as possible usage for buildings.

These osm features don't represent actual caverns. Are you aware of what it is exactly?

Using man_made=works is suitable, problem is to replace building=* with man_made=works. It's two different things which aren't incompatible.

I've surveyed it several times, these are buildings, built from concrete in place.
https://www.bulletin.ch/files/content/news-articles/B_Artikel/2019/1902/B_1902_NdD/B_1902_Nant-de-Drance_Figure_4.png
Could you restore it please?

Cheers
Halbtax (2022-10-17 05:53:17+00:00): Hello 

I am well aware that the inside of the cavern is made of concrete. But that does not make it a building. A building is erected on the terrain, a cavern is excavated out of the rock. These are two very different concepts. For a building you can see the walls and roof from the outside, for a cavern you can't see anything from the outside. We should not mix the two. 

Wikipedia quotes a definition "A building is a structure with a roof and walls …". OSM uses the term a bit less narrowly. However, we should not stretch the meaning of the tag too far from the general definition. This would reduce the quality and usefulness of the map. 

Tagging caverns is not really widespread yet. Very few mappers can verify their exact location with sufficient accuracy. Perhaps man_made=cavern could be more suitable. OSM also allows own values here.

Cheers
InfosReseaux (2022-10-18 09:35:33+00:00): Hello

"For a building you can see the walls and roof from the outside" Do you have any source that can confirm this assumption please?

"we should not stretch the meaning of the tag too far from the general definition"
The structure I'm tagging here does have a roof and walls, I'm not stretching anything.

"Tagging caverns"
I'm not tagging caverns, but building inside caverns, that's not exactly the same although we could mix them both on the same osm feature.

That's why I'm asking to restore building=industrial or at least building=yes on these spaces please

Cheers
Halbtax (2022-11-07 08:04:35+00:00): Hello

Perhaps we have argued a little past each other up to now. I am sorry about that. I was under the impression that we were talking about mapping caverns. 

When it comes to describing structures within caverns, we should bear in mind that caverns themselves are already artificially created underground structures. For what is contained within them, we should keep in mind the rules of indoor mapping. Compare also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

I was in this area last summer and could not find anything that could be called a building at this position. In OSM, buildings are usually associated with structures on the surface. Other underground structures such as underground car parks are also not mapped as buildings unless they are also visible on the surface. I think it would be very misleading to find a building here on the map that is not visible to the normal visitor. 

Cheers
Szymson (2022-07-28 09:53:38+00:00): Po co dodajesz sklepy tam gdzie ich nie ma?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
emvee (2022-07-30 11:01:10+00:00): Hi  nurdafur,

In this changeset you added cycleway=opposite to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533253274/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142906940/history

But cycleway=opposite has been deprecated at least for the Netherlands, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Acycleway%3Dopposite#Deprecated_in_the_Netherlands

I think it is actually beter to remove cycleway=opposite for sure if there is oneway:bicycle=no, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63464
nurdafur (2022-07-30 16:44:35+00:00): Hi Emvee

That is the first time I heard of it being deprecated. I will not use it anymore.
emvee (2022-07-31 06:33:52+00:00): No problem, this kind of information flows slow within the OSM community.

Happy mapping!
Joey Total Auto (2022-07-28 06:29:37+00:00): Trying to add my business to map . East valley truck and accessories is no longer in business . It’s now Total Automotive & Performance
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Warin61 (2022-07-29 00:52:44+00:00): Hi
I have restored the original wetland relation. Looking at the DCS Base Map the wetland area looks to be 'ambitious' (from 2016) and could be reduced to that of the Base map.
yury_kontur (2022-07-29 07:11:35+00:00): Hi
This territory cannot currently be a swamp, because there are reclamation canals there. The fields and forests are not swampy.
Warin61 (2022-07-29 08:17:54+00:00): If you want to remove all of the wetland .. the delete the relation and then the 3 ways if the ways server no function.
pnorman (2022-07-28 07:50:20+00:00): Judging by the imagery and online results, there's only one company physically there that does business under multiple names.

There's clearly a scrap_yard there, so I've cleaned up the duplicates and left the one that was originally mapped.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Szymson (2022-07-28 10:18:20+00:00): W jakim celu?
maraf24 (2022-07-28 16:18:27+00:00): Nabijania liczby zestawów zmian? Zabijania nudy?
Będzie się tak bawił pewnie całe wakacje.
Taksine (2024-09-12 04:08:07+00:00): 少玩点maps.me吧，真以为自己写的对了吗
janolezab (2022-07-28 13:53:31+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Eintragung einer Kanzlei. Ich habe aber zwei Probleme mit diesem Changeset:
1. Der vorhandene Adressknoten wurde sozusagen „gekapert“. Wer nach dieser Adresse sucht, bekommt nur die Kanzlei als Ergebnis, obwohl die Adresse mehr als sie enthält (nämlich das restliche Wohnhaus). Dies habe ich durch das Anlegen eines neuen Knotens behoben.
2. Werbung ist in OSM unerwünscht. Eine Beschreibung sollte der reinen Information dienen. Außerdem war der Text unvollständig, weil abgeschnitten.

https://osm.org/changeset/124188367 behebt diese Probleme.
highflyer74 (2022-07-29 13:06:32+00:00): Moin Auf Achse und auch ein herzliches willkommen von mir!

Hier wurde ein Objekt in ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=place%20of%20worship?uselang=de umgetaggt. Stimmte das vorherige https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=wayside%20cross?uselang=de nicht? Alternativ gibt es auch noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine

Viele Grüße!
Auf Achse (2022-07-29 13:20:39+00:00): Hallo highflyer,

habe bei der Bezeichnung Wegkreuz im ersten Moment keinen Bezug zu einem religiösen Kreuz hegestellt sondern eher an eine Wegekreuzung gedacht. Daher die Änderung. Beim Nachlesen in den Links stelle ich nun fest, dass das vorherige Objekt durchaus korrekt war. Ich werde es wieder ändern.

Danke für den Hinweis.
Auf Achse
Auf Achse (2022-07-29 13:23:14+00:00): Erledigt
gscscnd (2022-07-30 08:26:33+00:00): Tutaj niedawno była krótka dyskusja: <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=866472#p866472> — może masz jakieś przemyślenia do dodania? Tutaj przykład drogi otagowanej tak jak aktualnie wydaje mi się najlepiej (pod względem tagów access): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172665415>.
ToniE (2022-07-28 08:27:58+00:00): Hi RoBurM,

name:de ist nicht ganz korrekt, das es nicht die deutsche Version von 'name' ist.

"alt_name" = "alternativer Name" oder "loc_name" = "lokaler Name" wäre besser

alt_name, short_name, official_name, loc_name, ... werden bei der Suche behandelt wie 'name', 'name:de', ...

VG Toni
RoBurM (2022-07-28 11:49:40+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Anregung, das versuche ich gleich so einzutragen. Danke auch f+r die Erläuterung, dass alt_name auch in der Suche verwandt wird.
VG Robert
ToniE (2022-07-28 14:23:28+00:00): Servus Robert,

ich habe noch ein paar weitere Tags angebracht:

amenity=community_centre

community_centre=youth_centre

community_centre:for=juvenile

Gibt's Öffungszeiten? Konnte auf die Schnelle nichts auf der Website finden.

VG Toni
RoBurM (2022-07-28 16:01:15+00:00): Hi Toni, Das ist ganz individuell. In den Häusern übernachten / campen junge Leute. Öffnungszeiten gibt es m.M. nach nicht. Danke für die zusätzlichen Infos.
Robert
DaveF (2022-07-28 09:54:57+00:00): Thanks for spotting & reversing.
Tom Delmas (2022-07-28 18:21:05+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé ce changement, ce n'est pas l'avenue du Général de Gaulle mais bien du Maréchal de lattre de tassigny.
habi (2025-09-10 07:08:01+00:00): Ciao chnuessli
Die Telefonnummer des Defi verweist auf https://kuenzlerimpuls.ch/, die sind im 16B auf der anderen Strassenseite.
Ich habe den Defi dorthin bewegt.
Gruss,
habi
highflyer74 (2022-07-29 11:00:22+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please be a little more careful. There where lots of buildings added that are

- double tagged, partly with wrong Building=Yes which makes it invalid (remember lower case letters for tags)

- buildings mapped as nodes

- nodes that are part of a building outline are partly tagged as buildings

- almost no building is rectangular (please use letter "q" to do so)

To get a overview check https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kyi and be so kind to fix the issues before editing further.

Thank you!
Frans S (2022-09-10 10:37:23+00:00): Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
Dodko (2022-07-28 14:29:16+00:00): crooked buildings inserted over existing buildings
highflyer74 (2022-07-29 11:00:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please be a little more careful. There where lots of buildings added that are

- double tagged, partly with wrong Building=Yes which makes it invalid (remember lower case letters for tags)

- buildings mapped as nodes

- nodes that are part of a building outline are partly tagged as buildings

- almost no building is rectangular (please use letter "q" to do so)

To get a overview check https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kyi and be so kind to fix the issues before editing further.

Thank you!
somix (2022-07-28 07:49:07+00:00): Hello, please read the wiki on how to classify highways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Frans S (2022-08-25 14:43:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124170247
syntex (2024-04-28 14:25:24+00:00): Ale ono chyba jeszcze nie jest zrekultywowane, tylko podlega wieloletniemu procesowi rekultywacji?
habi (2022-11-14 10:15:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243500341 darf so wie du diese jetzt erfasst hast, von *keinem* Motorfahrzeug befahren werden. Ich denke Anwohner:innen dürfen da durchfahren, oder?
Ich habe (wie von dir gewünscht :) ) Den Strassensperr-Steinblock hier erfasst https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2508965114/, also soltle aus meiner Sicht die Allmendstrasse zumindest wieder für Anwohner:innen freigegeben werden, oder?
Schwendi (2022-11-14 12:00:16+00:00): man darf von beiden Seiten bis an den Steinblock ranfahren. Ist einfach keine Durchgangsstrasse mehr. Also vom Heimstättenweg und Weiachstrasse/Allmendstrasse bis dahin.
habi (2022-11-16 08:21:17+00:00): Ich habe das soeben so angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128976427