piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-10-28 18:20:51+00:00): Dag kjrunia,

Je vraagt om een review.
Soms verandert er wel eens wat.. Dan is het correct om het aan te passen.
Je hebt operator= toegevoegd. 
Dat lijkt me niet correct. 
De operator=  hoort  thuis op de routerelatie.
Daar zal die ook vast wel staan. 
Soms zijn er ook meer OV ondernemingen die over de route rijden.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-28 19:57:49+00:00): operator	=U-OV verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
kjrunia (2020-10-29 12:01:10+00:00): Dank voor de correctie qua operator. Die hoorde daar inderdaad niet. Wordt de naam van beide bushaltes niettemin wel aangepast naar Verdistraat?
eggie (2020-10-29 12:32:56+00:00): Dag kjrunia,
Die naam heb je zelf aangepast, maar de rendering gaat wat traag. 
Ik heb alleen operator = verwijderd. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/646746355

Wellicht helpt het als je een paar keer CTRL-F5 en F5 toetst. Je cache leeg maken. 

MVG,
eggie
kjrunia (2020-10-29 12:36:42+00:00): O, juist! Excuus en dank!
user_5359 (2020-11-01 06:52:14+00:00): Hello! You add on three ways (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZAu) your name as tag Hannes=Röst- What is the meaning of this information?
eggie (2020-10-28 19:45:22+00:00): Beste .. het is niet nodig om foot=yes op reguliere wegen te taggen.
MVG,
eggie
ovruni (2020-10-28 17:32:35+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en algunas de sus ediciones se han generado angulos agudo en vías, tambien otras que se han desconectado. Actualmente en el proyecto contamos con diferentes imagenes áereas, según que imagen se utilice puede haber una variación de como se encuentra ubicada, incluso una imagen de una misma empresa puede moverse según la fecha en la cual fue tomada por el satelite. Las imagenes con las cuales fueron actualizadas por parte del equipo del Equipo Humanitario de OpenStreetMap parecen haber utilizado una imagen similar a la de Maxar Premium, la cual parece encontrarse mas actualizada que la Bing en la zona. Por otra parte considere utilizar un texto en su conjunto de cambios que permita a otros mapeadores entender en que han consistido estos cambios, tal como se encuentra indicado en los buenos conjuntos de cambios.[0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
osmviborg (2020-10-28 19:24:09+00:00): Siger ordet 'vandalisme' dig noget?
PT-53 (2020-10-29 06:58:11+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864705324
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-29 06:58:58+00:00): Das gleiche bei dieser Linie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864705349/history
PT-53 (2020-11-08 07:33:10+00:00): erledigt
aceman444 (2020-11-18 11:40:55+00:00): The British International School name is already tagged on the school grounds, why adding it to one of the buildings too? It's a duplicate and actually does nothing, as just a name does not make a school (amenity=school tag is needed too, but it already exists on the school grounds).
aceman444 (2020-11-18 11:41:47+00:00): Also touching the building extent (using low-res Bing) does not seem useful, but fixing the tennis pitches looks OK, thanks.
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:54:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93191736
2-wheels (2020-10-30 13:09:14+00:00): Thanks for you invitation. In case i have some question i just will contact you by Telegram. I usually only update some Hotel details and add wikidata, wikipedia and wikimedia to historic places.
Sometimes i do street alignment if looks to mess.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93191736
Moldovan_Merkator (2022-10-04 16:08:40+00:00): По поводу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68002311 Ты уверен что там ГСК-150? По данным gislocal-а так ГСК-109
aceman444 (2020-11-18 11:20:55+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments than "random edits", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aceman444 (2020-11-18 11:25:08+00:00): Also, how do you know the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23043917 is oneway? You only quote the outdated and low res Bing imagery, but you can't see traffic signs on bing. But it can be seen that at the south end at the roundabout the road has 2 lanes, apparently for each direction.
Please quote your real sources properly and explain this change.
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-28 18:50:53+00:00): Note: you're entering old_name, not contemporary name so this should go to old_name:pl, not name:pl.
Supaplex030 (2020-11-13 16:47:05+00:00): Zwei Wochen hat er durchgehalten - R.I.P. Poller! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8059749855
Die Lebenserwartung eines durchschnittlichen Neuköllner Pollers war auch schonmal länger, oder? Und kann es sein, dass da jemand entweder vergessen hat, eine Gehwegvorstreckung unter den Poller zu bauen oder er einfach an der falschen Stelle errichtet wurde? :O
!bm (2020-11-13 17:16:01+00:00): Sad but true. Ich habe es zuvor gesehen – warst du wieder mal schneller. Nun steht eine temporäre Bake Wache, um die Radständer zu schützen. Fußgänger: egal.
Supaplex030 (2020-11-13 17:18:19+00:00): Hast du noch die Pollerleiche gesehen, wie sie grausam zermatscht auf dem Boden lag? Ein herzzerreißender Anblick. Hab leider gestern kein Foto gemacht und heute war sie schon beerdigt.
!bm (2020-11-13 18:17:32+00:00): Furchtbar, der Anblick blieb mir erspart. Ich sah zuletzt noch Neigung auf 45°, hatte es aber leider auch nicht fotografiert.
Glassman (2020-10-28 23:36:11+00:00): Tip: if the address didn't change, it's best to leave the address. 
Tip: OSM spells out street names. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93192915
Puxan (2020-11-02 18:44:01+00:00): Edificios duplicados que elimino
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93194188
adamr_osm (2020-10-28 18:05:06+00:00): #wsp2020 #wsp2020gisday #wspuk
Puxan (2020-10-28 18:43:06+00:00): Se ha etiquetado toda una carretera como puente. 2 edificios comparten nodos con vías. Falta escuadrado de un edificio
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93194492
mariotomo (2020-10-29 00:07:31+00:00): Hola Kaart!  por favor, no vuelvan a cambiar rutas extraurbanas en 'residential', esto no tiene sentido.  si quieren participar en la discusión de qué es "Tertiary" qué "Unclassified" etc etc, por favor entren en el grupo Telegram.  cambios de esta clase, sin discusión en el grupo, no son bienvenidos.
SurferDude1 (2020-10-29 23:10:07+00:00): Thank you for the information. I will refer to the telegram channel in the future for classification edits.
user_5359 (2020-11-19 05:43:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question about your entry: You have entered a named object with a hashtag. Is this really the name of the object or "only" a label for your action?
ioanna_la (2020-11-19 09:17:57+00:00): Hi, and thank you! it's only a label for my action. this was part of a mapathon so we were asked to put the hashtags in the description. apologies if I have done so incorrectly.
user_5359 (2020-11-19 19:19:48+00:00): I have correct the name of the buildings.
rab (2020-10-28 19:23:09+00:00): Hello,
please change the background layer to Maxar. It's much more recent
andergrin (2020-10-29 06:09:03+00:00): Відкотив правки, зміщення фону
s0mik (2020-11-14 12:12:27+00:00): Вот как раз смотрю Пивоварова по этой теме)
SHARCRASH (2020-10-29 17:19:54+00:00): You've merge a forest with the residential area... i have to undo you edits
SHARCRASH (2020-10-29 17:28:46+00:00): Actually you even considered a park as forest... and even changed a residential area in forest, not sure why. Please read the definition of a forest.
osmviborg (2020-10-29 07:23:03+00:00): Husk altid at kontrollere om en cykelsti allerede er tagget på hovedvejen. Det er tilfældet her. Rettet.
Ilstrup (2020-10-29 07:25:25+00:00): Beklager - den havde jeg misset! Tak for rettelsen.
eggie (2021-06-19 22:22:02+00:00): Dag Padvinder,

Ben je hier nu werkelijk geweest?
Dit zijn allemaal wegen die op avccess=private horen en zeker deels niet geasfalteerd zijn.
Waarom dan tracktype=grade1 toevoegen?
MVG
eggie
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:23:07+00:00): Not an import in the traditional sense. Every building was verified and added one at a time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93198286
DUGA (2021-06-21 17:05:20+00:00): The traffic signal should not be added there. Instead, the link should be deleted first because there is no physical barrier.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98789978/history#map=19/38.92273/-76.62799
Hb- (2020-10-30 20:23:31+00:00): How do you get the information about the population? For example in Khanlig a lot of houses seem intact but you set population=0. Did all Armenians flee?
syntex (2020-10-30 20:46:40+00:00): A lot of? I see 3 of them. But it doesn't even matter, it was captured by Azerbaijan and all civilians fled that place. In this conflict, if the place is captured by Azerbaijan, there is no one left behind, as the whole population flee the place. This is especially the case in Hadrut and surrounding villages populated by armenians and now they are empty. I doubt that they will be allowed by Azerbaijanis to go there ever again. But in this changeset I only took into consideration those empty azerbaijani villages since 1994.
osmviborg (2020-10-29 07:29:22+00:00): Cykelstien er tagget på Horsensvej. Rettet.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:35:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8060137975/history has access:hgv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?
SekeRob (2024-02-05 19:18:56+00:00): Done
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:23:31+00:00): Adding buildings and sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93198993
user_5359 (2020-11-29 09:25:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/864765830: See the access value: Did you mean private or permissive or public?
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:24:51+00:00): Not sure why this is flagged. Adding footways is good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93199159
Bamba Saladu (2020-10-29 12:09:43+00:00): Bei der Geländemodellierung im Baugebiet Auenland 3 hast du dich auf veraltete Fotos gestützt. Da sieht es aktuell ganz anders aus. Nur die Baumreihe ist zum Teil noch erhalten mit Lücken für die projektierten Straßen, ansonsten aufgegrabene Erde.
Luboš Kadeřábek (2020-11-01 12:09:36+00:00): Prosím o revert, přidávání nesmyslných názvů.
Piskvor (2020-11-11 16:46:47+00:00): reverted
skfd (2020-11-02 10:27:01+00:00): Привет! Тут что-то напутано с Аолександровской улицей. Придворовые проезды не должны иметь имя, я думаю. Ну и непонятно почему Васильковская стала Александровской
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93199764
Xtremator (2020-11-02 12:04:01+00:00): Привет. Это новосозданная улица под ЖК. Ул. Васильковская по сути закончилась в центре села, дальше это уже Садовая перетекающая в Александровскую под ЖК Новые Теремки, где отметил. По внутридворовым пожалуй согласен. Делал по сути для идентификации точки на картах 
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:25:17+00:00): Adding houses and sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93199864
Frans S (2020-11-01 11:48:43+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria.  Not a single buildings has been mapped properly and squared.
You used the Bing Imagery despite the presribed imagery is Maxar Premium
Please read the documentation how to change that 
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
andergrin (2020-10-29 06:05:11+00:00): Відкотив правки, зміщення фону
eggie (2020-10-28 21:07:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Je pad staat erop.
Is het westelijk deel wellicht een highway=track met tracktype=grade4  
Wanneer een weg geschikt is voor bv een landbouwvoertuig dan taggen we track ipv path.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-28 21:50:22+00:00): Zie verschil path en track
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:highway%3Dpath

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track?uselang=nl
Nakaner (2020-10-29 09:47:22+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Deine Angaben zur maximalen Fahrzeugzeugzahl, zur Telefonnummer, zum Betreiber und zur maximalen Leistung sind in der Form, wie du sie eingegeben hast, nicht maschinell auswertbar und daher für Anwendungen, die diese Daten nutzen, unzugänglich/nicht verarbeitbar.

capacity=* sollte eine ganzzahlige Zahl größer oder gleich 0 sein

Wenn eine Station zwei Betreiber hat, trennen wir diese durch ein Semikolon ohne Leerzeichen, da das bei OpenStreetMap das Trennzeichen für Keys mit mehreren Werten ist.

Für Telefonnummern gibt es eigene Keys, z.B. phone=*.

Auch für die Leistung gibt spezielle Keys.

Bitte wirf einen Blick auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station. Könntest du die Station anschließend in OSM bitte anpassen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93200242
Victor709 (2020-11-01 02:40:50+00:00): MV Sithole, 17072973, 29/10/2020
Kovoschiz (2020-10-29 12:21:55+00:00): I agree with the left turn, but what about the right turn? It's noticeably curved, not a standard intersection.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93201266
Admasawi (2020-10-30 17:33:06+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz,
Thank you for the question. I see the curved paint you're referring to, but I edited the geometry to allow vehicles coming from east (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841969388) to turn north (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227755023) as seen in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=22.38460529132037&lng=114.18966419074142&z=17&pKey=LAirXNJNhmg8q8N6s7BJII&focus=photo). I added a no_straight_on turn restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3122346), to accomplish what the curved geometry was preventing before.

Thanks for reaching out, please let me know if you have any more questions about this edit. 
- Admasawi
Puxan (2020-10-31 19:22:14+00:00): Buen trabajo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93201631
treestryder (2020-12-22 03:37:29+00:00): This section of railroad is not abandoned, it no longer exists. The tracks are long gone and most of the railroad grade has disappeared to time and developments. With OpenStreetMap, we are to map what is on the ground. And this should be removed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground

Looking at some of your other edits, I think you might find the Open Historical Map of interest.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
treestryder (2020-12-17 04:14:40+00:00): This section of railroad is not abandoned, it no longer exists. The tracks are long gone and most of the railroad grade has disappeared to time and developments. With OpenStreetMap, we are to map what is on the ground. And this should be removed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground

Looking at some of your other edits, I think you might find the Open Historical Map of interest. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
Javier Sanchez (2021-06-23 07:24:51+00:00): For future edits, please consider that storage tanks could also be tagged as building. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
Carto'Cité (2020-11-13 11:53:27+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution ... pour laquelle j'ai quelques questions :-)

Le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864815088 traverse une zone de travaux : est-ce que les travaux sont terminés ?

S'agit-il vraiment d'une rue piétonne (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=pedestrian) ou simplement d'un passage pour les piétons ?

Le nom de cette voie est-il vraiment "voie nouvelle" ? Si tu ne connais pas son nom ou s'il n'y a pas de panneau de rue, le mieux est de ne pas ajouter de tag name : ainsi un autre contributeur pensera à l'ajouter.

Enfin tu as indiqué les adresses (ce qui est bien) sur les nodes faisant partie de cette voie, ce qui ne se fait pas : je les ai séparés de la voie.

Si tu peux partager une ou plusieurs photos cela peut aider de bien cartographier cette voie.

Merci d'avance,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
bigjohn92 (2020-11-18 20:03:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a des questions qui se posent en effet :
- les travaux sont terminés, oui (à part quelques détails de finition)
- le terme "passage pour piétons" est plus approprié (bien que la SNCF a le droit de faire passer des véhicules pour accéder au viaduc du RER C)
- le nom est vraiment "voie nouvelle" (il existe un arrêté de numérotation qui le spécifie) cependant la voie sera rebaptisée lors d'un conseil municipal en décembre
Merci pour les corrections sur les n°. J'essayerai d'ajouter des photos prochainement.
John.
Carto'Cité (2020-11-19 07:58:55+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces réponses.
J'ai supprimé la zone de travaux, remis le nom Voie nouvelle et changé son type en highway=footway.
Mais je me pose la question de cette voie : https://www.osm.org/way/197890596. Y a-t-il vraiment 2 voies ou il s'agit de la même ? 
Antoine.
Nakaner (2020-10-29 09:43:12+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864831055/history construction=tertiary gesetzt? Das tertiary wirkt für mich hier falsch.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93203444
Radboss (2020-10-29 18:40:48+00:00): Ja, gute Frage :) Ich war mir da kürzlich nicht so ganz sicher... Wäre aus Deiner Sicht dann eher "unclassified" angebracht? Die Variante "residential" passt unter anderem zwecks geplantem Busbahnhof vermutlich eher nicht.
5m4u9 (2020-10-29 05:16:39+00:00): Hi, In Bolivia, especially in western cities (oruro, la paz, potosí) and valleys (tarija, chuquisaca, cochabamba) MAXAR's imagery have errors since it doesn't adjust to the mountain slopes.

For example in this place, Zabaleta Avenue is above a river and on the sides are the houses, between avenue and houses there is a difference in altitude of ~30/40 meters, the MAXAR imagery don't adjust this problem. Better to use the Bing images.

If you use the MAXAR imagery you must adjust the image to the data every ~50 meters.
Ned_Stark (2020-10-29 17:26:34+00:00): Hi, thank you for this information. I will be sure to utilize it going forward in Bolivia.
Glassman (2020-10-29 15:59:11+00:00): Your changeset comment indicated there is another location for the carwash. Can you update the tags on that location to remove it? Let me know if you need help.

Also building=service would indicate this is a small building that contains working machinery like a pump station. I'd recommend building=retail.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93204626
ToteraWebSystems (2020-10-29 16:56:06+00:00): Yes, I need help. We are trying to use OSM for our website, but it showing our location in the wrong place. Where can I find instructions on how to update the tags on that location to remove it?
Glassman (2020-10-29 17:40:37+00:00): Just go to the wrong location and edit the tags to remove the name. Can you point me to the wrong location? I searched on "The Caarwash & Detail" in all of OSM but didn't find another listing. I'm happy to fix it.

BTW - I plan to have my car detailed next week but unfortunately I'm in Mount Vernon, WA.
BAGgeraar (2020-11-02 17:04:01+00:00): Graag eerst de gegevens verifiëren voordat je ze invoert. Zo heet de A15 alleen ten westen van Steenen Baakplein 'Europaweg', en bestaat de N15 voor het gedeelte van Rijkswaterstaat niet, ook niet voor de Calandbrug. Dat is gewoon allemaal A15, zie het Nationaal Wegenbestand of de hectometerpaaltjes.
Als er nog meer is wat je op die manier hebt aangepast, kun je daar dan nog eens kritisch naar kijken?
JeroenvanderGun (2020-11-02 17:18:16+00:00): Ik heb geen reden te twijfelen aan Wegenwiki betreffende Europaweg. Het tankstation voor de Thomassentunnel had als adres ook al Europaweg staan. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2768145541 Ook Google Maps hanteert de naam Europaweg voor dit stuk A15.

Op de hectometerbordjes rondom de Calandbrug staat wel degelijk N15, in ieder geval op alle Google Streetview-beelden (recentste i.i.g. maart 2019), m.u.v. korte stukjes aan het begin/eind (deze heb ik gemarkeerd met official_ref=A15).
BAGgeraar (2020-11-02 17:50:34+00:00): Vroeger was dit inderdaad Europaweg, net als dat vroeger het wegnummer A15 was. Tegenwoordig echter niet meer. Zie het Nationaal Wegenbestand voor de correcte, actuele situatie. En gebruik vooral geen Google Streetview, dat is niet toegestaan voor OSM! Wegenwiki is erg interessant, maar deze heeft niet de waarheid in pacht.
Dus het beste is om de wegsituatie ter plaatse te bekijken, óf geautoriseerde bronnen te gebruikten (bijvoorbeeld het Nationaal Wegenbestand of Mapillary).
BAGgeraar (2020-11-03 07:36:22+00:00): Nog een aanvulling: bekijk ook de BGT, hier staat als straatnaam 'Rijksweg 15'.
En het adres van het tankstation is inmiddels gewijzigd van Europaweg in Rijksweg 15, zie hiervoor de BAG.
nevw (2020-10-29 14:19:29+00:00): Hi
I notice that you have removed the street name, Hamilton Street.
Was that incorrect? And if so, what is the correct street name?
nevw (2020-10-30 10:30:37+00:00): No response, reverted removal of name of Hamilton Street
user_6446486 (2020-10-30 21:41:57+00:00): Зачем вы удалили 35 кВ с ЭЧЭ Покровское-Стрешнево и кусок подходящей ЛЭП 35 кВ? Она  раньше была недействующей, но в августе этого года я там был - достроено всё вплоть до заходов в ЗРУ 35 кВ. Неужто разобрали за осень новую с иголочки ЛЭП?
https://ibb.co/D9mNGsF
https://ibb.co/mN9QWK4
https://ibb.co/JB2FPTX
stargunru (2020-10-30 23:17:44+00:00): Извините, ошибся. По панорамам 2018 года подумал, что убрали
andergrin (2020-10-29 05:48:59+00:00): Зверніть увагу, що шар Вінниця 2020 має зміщення, перед тим, як редагувати, фон треба змістити. В редакторі натиснути B (Налаштування тла), прокрутити до самого низу, і в полі Зміщення фону пересунити мишею на координати приблизно 8,56; 6,95. Цю правку відкочую
aharvey (2020-10-29 05:32:23+00:00): I think it's unlikely that at these points this far upstream that it would have enough flow to be classed as a river. Generally the name is irrelevant to the tags just because it's named Kedumba River doesn't mean it must be waterway=river. If it's got less flow and not that wide then waterway=stream is better.
radiotrefoil (2020-10-29 06:05:03+00:00): Yeah was a bit iffy on that one, agreed, cheers
d1754 (2020-10-31 21:47:52+00:00): Why did you deleted the bicycle lane on both side of the road