piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LucGommans (2024-08-13 08:05:35+00:00): Een slagboom in Nederland heet ook niet barrière=slagboom, dus een kunstwerk in Nederland een engelse tag geven vind ik niet zo vreemd :P
Het is aan de applicatie om dingen als barrier=lift_gate weer te geven in de lokale taal, zoals slagboom bij ons, boom barrier in engelstalige gebieden (lift gate kennen ze namelijk niet), Schranken in duitstalige gebieden, enz.
Het is niet zozeer "omwille van de rest van de wereld" als "omwille van dat OSM ook in Nederland bruikbaar blijft", gezien niemand met vertalingen om zou kunnen gaan:

- Als softwareontwikkelaar zou het naar mijn idee niet opschieten om alle OSM-software eerst door alle vertalingen te moeten laten zoeken wanneer het een "boomstronk"-tag tegenkomt, om dat vervolgens weer terug te vertalen naar de taal van de gebruiker (bijv. Baumstamm).

- Als mapper/tagger zie ik in dat idee ook een probleem voor mensen die de lokale taal niet kennen: je kan op vakantie dan niet aan de kaart bijdragen omdat je de lokale benaming niet kent (in het Frans gaat misschien nog, maar denk aan Polen, China, Ethiopië, ...). Om over false friends nog maar te zwijgen (waar je in Nederland een toilet tagt voor de grote boodschap, moet je het in België wellicht begrijpen als prostitutielocatie).

Ik begrijp niet waarom een voorwerp een Nederlandse tag zou moeten hebben enkel omdat het in Nederland staat of is bedacht, zolang een alom bekend Engels woord ervoor bestaat. Dit is natuurlijk uitgezonderd de freeform velden zoals description, defibrillator:location, name, enz. die wel standaard in de lokale taal zijn (en :taal suffixen kennen), waarvan ik alleen description kan bedenken als hier van toepassing zijnde

subject:nl=Boomstronk kan wellicht, al is tree_trunk al een letterlijke vertaling daarvan en zouden (wanneer die waarde bij applicaties bekend raakt) de OSM-elementen geen vertaling meer in zich hoeven dragen. Subject lijkt ook al andere subtags te hebben (zoals subject:wikidata=*) dus een vertaling-suffix botst misschien. Het gebruik van een taalcode zoals nl: als prefix heb ik nog nooit gezien dus dat zou ook afwijken van alle standaarden zover ik weet.

Wat je dus precies wil voorstellen snap ik niet helemaal (nl: als prefix? Waarden in de lokale taal in het algemeen? Alleen artworks vertalen?), maar algemeen is het denk ik zaak om eerst te overleggen met andere communityleden voor een nieuwe standaard

Van de andere kant, als jij het niet eens bent dan wil ik daar ook zeker niet tegenin gaan. Ik zou dan voorstellen bijvoorbeeld op het forum te overleggen wat het juiste schema voor deze voorwerpen is
OttoR (2024-08-13 15:34:21+00:00): Nee niet fel tegen; meer omdat het hier ok een kunstwerk gaat en 'boomstronk' een beschrijving van het kunstwerk zelf is. 

Alle andere tags zijn standaard sleutels waarvoor je in een vertaal tabel voor elke taal de lokale sleutel kan geven.
danilax86 (2022-08-25 21:24:22+00:00): Откатил предыдущий пакет :)
кривые руки
Carto'Cité (2022-09-29 13:11:50+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,
Est-ce que tu peux me dire pourquoi tu as retiré le bicycle=designated de ces chemins ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/812869789
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844640307
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078757193
C'est une vraie question parce qu'il semblerait que les informations viennent de la ville de Cergy et à la vue de l'aménagement ça semble plutôt assez dédié aux piétons et cyclistes. Après c'est vrai que je n'ai rien trouvé qui permette non plus d'aller vers du designated donc je me pose vraiment la question.
Je me suis permis d'ajouter quelques éléments de description pour mieux cerner ces chemins.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Furdrien (2022-09-30 19:30:29+00:00): Bonjours Charles !

Je me suis permis de retiré le tag bicycle=designated de ces chemins car quelque jours après la modification de simon_geovelo, j'ai eu l'occasion de passer par ici, et j'ai pu constater la non présence de pictos vélo ou encore de panneau B22a ; C113 ou C115 

Nous somme en "agglomération" et par défaut, sans signalisation sur place, c'est un trottoir, on peut difficilement justifier le tag bicycle=designated, 

Je suis allé vérifier du point de vue de la CACP (gestionnaire de voirie) et l'agglo considère ces chemins comme cyclables...

https://geoagglo.cergypontoise.fr/portal/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=310b532853fe45a2bb16550d2fea57ae&extent=1.9629,49.0058,2.1653,49.0709

Mais, est qu'un plan tiers peut servir de justification alors qu'il n'y a rien sur le terrain,

Bien à Toi !
Furdrien
Carto'Cité (2022-10-03 13:03:35+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour 🙏
Si tu as la moindre question n'hésite pas.
Charles
eggie (2022-08-25 22:03:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  De landuse bij Sint Kruis heb ik hersteld.
Het water stond in een relatie als inner in een multipolygoon, maar die had je nu buiten het water gelegd. Best lastig voor een starter. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Negreheb (2022-09-05 08:47:16+00:00): I'm not sure adding google photos through an additional layer to hide it is allowed for OSM. Do you have any comments on that?
NKA (2022-09-05 14:35:01+00:00): And you did promise to stop splitting lines, right? Here, a river has been splitted just to insert a picture. Please use nodes.
Gazer75 (2022-09-05 16:26:29+00:00): Please stop adding random photo links of things like a stream. You're also going in on someones private road and property taking picture of their homes.
Did you ask for permission from the owner before publishing it?
Константин Гам (2023-03-22 09:24:22+00:00): На инженерной улице ничего не менялось, она не стала односторонней и по сей день.
Пожалуйста, не вносите правки с бумажек чинуш. Проверяйте на местности.
На марсовом тоже направление спутано было, но это исправлял ранее.
Как вредители какие-то эти "постановления" пишут, не ведитесь на них, пожалуйста.
Константин Гам (2023-03-23 11:45:10+00:00): И тут неверное направление:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146296726/history
Bobropiton (2023-03-24 09:16:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Касательно Ставропольской-да, в новости было неверно указано направление введение одностороннего движения. Спасибо что исправили. Касательно проезда вдоль Марсова поля и Инженерной улицы-есть свежие фото от марта месяца, в которых подтверждается введение одностороннего движения именно в тех направлениях, в которых и вносилась мной правка. В частности-Марсово поле одностороннее от Миллионной к Мойке. Инженерная улица-односторонняя от набережной Грибоедова до ворот между домами 2-4 литК и 2-4Г литГ
Константин Гам (2023-03-24 09:38:46+00:00): Значит эти односторонние не были актуальны на момент правки, в документы внесли что-то заранее.
Ибо я проверял на местности через месяц после правки примерно и направления были неверны
Frans S (2022-08-27 12:47:51+00:00): Hello. A remark. When you have to remove many buildings it is best to revert the changesets involved rather than just deleting them.
When you do mass deletions, you might be involved in a query for vandalism.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125381256
habi (2022-08-30 11:09:55+00:00): Ciao Orianda
Für mich sieht das auf den aktuellen swisstopo Luftbildern so aus, als würde die Bipperstrasse etwas kurviger verlaufen, wurde das nicht neu so gebaut?
BiduS hat das im April so angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120105657

Zusätzlich hast du die Verbindung aus dem Wald raus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62057892/) auf die Bipperstrasse getrennt, gibt'd denn diese nicht mehr?

Gruss,
habi
Orianda (2022-08-30 11:31:22+00:00): Hoi Habi,
die Strasse zweigt jetzt im direkten Winkel von der Aarwangerstrasse ab und verläuft dann wirkich nicht mehr so in kurviger Form nach Bannwil. Beim Waldweg ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die ist noch verbunden.
habi (2022-09-05 08:18:30+00:00): Super, danke für die Korrektur!
user_5359 (2022-08-28 11:50:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089335528 (one of thirteen objects). What is the meaning of the tag PageNumber = co?
onesimusGGA (2022-08-28 18:27:09+00:00): Hi! Sorry about that. I intend to type "construction" not "co" when editing the tag.
user_5359 (2022-08-28 18:42:30+00:00): But what is the meaning of the key PageNumber?
onesimusGGA (2022-08-28 18:59:47+00:00): PageNumber? That would be a mistake.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 18:50:52+00:00): name=The Dance Company
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3103072177

shop=dance ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Are they selling dance suppplies (shop=dance_supplies)? Is it dancing venue rather than shop? Office of dancing school? Something else?
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:10:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125381935
tomzyl (2025-09-12 08:23:36+00:00): W Jastarni nie ma w takim razie przejazdu przez tory, a przeciez jest dojazd do Hotelu Zdrojowego. Chyba to trzeba zweryfikować.
Anas masuris (2025-09-12 09:55:59+00:00): Dojazd jest przez ul. Tadeusza Kościuszki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/213860617
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:09:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125382455
gscholz (2022-08-27 06:13:22+00:00): Hi  technopitecus,
thsi cahngeset has created error in the OSM database regardign self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.61578&lat=44.56008&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125382471

Obviously way 63672319 is negatively affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63672319#map=18/44.56269/8.61451

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kechan (2023-04-19 17:31:30+00:00): added farmland
iriman (2022-08-27 20:11:17+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy

I put this comment just to inform you about an edit I did on:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089391780

I added the name:fa to this feature for the 3rd time via changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125455560

Previously, you replaced geometries of this monument with new ones without keeping new attribute I added at 2 different times:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122820265
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125304676

thanks
LockOnGuy (2022-08-27 20:21:16+00:00): Hi, yes, I was correcting the relation of the monument, I did 5-ish revisions I guess until it become right so the 3rd shape view and render correctly without errors. I didn't notice your previous edits, so thanks for adding it back again. Please if you know the correct name:fa for other monuments in Baghdad, add them too as there is no name:fa in wikidata for me to add. Regards.
ptarac (2022-08-29 17:19:45+00:00): Hi,
1. In my opinion, you incorrectly marked these lines* as hedges. there are no hedges in the satellite imagery.
2. Please pay attention to whether the road passes through the barrier in the form of a hedge. You can see it perfectly in the pictures. Leave "gaps" in the hedge in these places. It took me a long time to get the roads through what you have drawn as hedges.

I think it would be worthwhile for you to review all the sets of changes that you have made in Somalia in this regard.

*among others these lines raised my doubts: #1089342629, #1089342630, #1089342623.
Mashin (2022-08-26 00:09:00+00:00): Immediately stop deleting data!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-26 08:59:20+00:00): What was wrong with fairways you deleted?
ptarac (2022-08-28 13:46:38+00:00): Why you made landuse=residental here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089344101 ???
In my opinion there's not any settelment.
Lapjun (2022-08-29 01:40:45+00:00): @[ptarac] Thanks for pointing that out, I actually meant to only mark landuse=residential for a single building that is within the area, but I made it for a whole large area by mistake.  Sorry about that.
Mashin (2022-08-26 00:27:21+00:00): Hole numbers don't belong to the 'name' tag. You've been told that before.
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:07:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125383186
elsy1 (2022-08-26 06:44:56+00:00): درود مواردی که اضافه کردید وجود ندارند! قبلا هم ویرایش داشتید که این مشکل رو داشتند و برگردانده شدند لطفا ملاحظه بفرمایید
elsy1 (2022-08-26 06:49:04+00:00): ویرایش شما برگشت داده شد. لطفا به کامنت ها پاسخ دهید
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-30 18:44:16+00:00): Why did you remove info from way  96165197, 99456995, 170281682, and 170281683?
Mashin (2022-08-26 01:05:14+00:00): Please don't create duplicate data. This fairway already exists.
nevw (2022-08-26 02:24:31+00:00): Hi
Could you explain further your changeset comments and also the reason you are deleting the points of interest, thanks
nevw (2022-09-01 02:53:23+00:00): no response, so I have no alternative but to revert both your changesets to leave the map intact. 
This changeset is the reversion: 125634226.
Let me know if you have been surveying the area and found the poi no longer exist, so that your changes can be re-instated.
tastrax (2022-08-26 03:01:03+00:00): Where are you getting address data from for all these edits? I hope you are not using Google or LIST data as neither is licenced for use on OSM.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 00:13:29+00:00): por favor, edite corretamente
nevw (2022-08-26 09:50:18+00:00): Hi
I notice a few lane extensions.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125384136

For example where there is a link from Marmion Avenue to Whitfords Avenue.
Osm only has a separate way mapped where there is a physical separation like a cement or metal barrier. The convention is not to draw a separate way based on line painting alone, even if solid white or double lines.

The ones you have changed appear to have been mapped correctly before you changed them. That is, they were only drawn as a separate way from where there was a physical barrier.
OSM is not intuitive in this regard, but I have been unable to find guidance in regard to this on the osm wiki as yet and will post a link if I find it.
QC3 Construction (2022-08-29 01:36:30+00:00): Ok cool
nevw (2022-08-29 02:04:59+00:00): I had no luck in finding a good wiki link on mapping divided roads but this helps
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways
The lanes tagging methods are good for detailing the lane changes and best done in Josm with help of plugins.
ScottNelson (2023-01-04 01:26:13+00:00): Madeley Explorer snowshoe trail actually uses the same piste as the Beverley Creek backcountry access route.  These should be mapped using the same way.  I think it is sufficient to have the piste:type=skitour tag applied only via the relation, as this relation also applies to a segment of the madeley creek loop XC ski trail
ScottNelson (2023-01-04 01:26:42+00:00): I'm going to go ahead and make this change to merge these ways.
bhietsch (2023-10-22 15:37:23+00:00): Just curious - what distinguishes these places (Cornwall, Newburgh, etc.) as townships and neighboring places (New Windsor, Blooming Grove, etc.) as towns? Still adapting from PA to NY local government, but seems like the two terms are used synonymously and they could be consolidated.
bhietsch (2023-10-23 13:40:48+00:00): No kidding... appreciate the very detailed explanation. As you suspected, my confusion was around the place nodes and when it is appropriate to use place=city/town/village/etc. vs. place=municipality. I believe I'm understanding correctly now that place=municipality + not:place=town is included to ensure the admin boundary (but NOT the place node) renders, and I understand cases like Newburgh where a place node for the town would be redundant and not represent the center of a settlement. 

My confusion was more directed towards instances like Blooming Grove (place=town) and Cornwall (place=municipality). Both towns have villages within their boundaries with distinct names. And for locals in that region, the name "Cornwall" is typically used for the region bound by Firthcliffe, whereas "Firthcliffe" is very rarely spoken. Based around the your outline, I would've tagged Cornwall with place=town, Blooming Grove as place=municipality (no defined settlement where the node is placed), and Firthcliffe as maybe place=locality (still found on some old signage, but rarely used these days). Any reservations with this proposal?
ke9tv (2023-10-23 14:44:57+00:00): You seem to have captured nicely what place=* is trying to achieve, and you're more familiar with the ground truth than I am.  Make it so!  (If you  upgrade Cornwall to place=town, then downgrade Firthcliffe to place=locality.)

The admin boundary will render nicely without a label node, in the default rendering.  The idea behind having a label node on each admin boundary is that a non-default rendering that focuses on political boundaries should be able to place labels by finding nodes in the boundary relation with the 'label' role.  (The default OSM rendering doesn't do this, but OSM is all about the data, not the default rendering.)

I've _been_ to the area to hike in Storm King, Black Rock Forest and Schunnemunk, but I think I've stopped in the town only once, about 25 years ago, when my daughter wound up in the ER there after a traffic accident in Woodbury/Central Valley. So my input to this project consisted mostly in cleaning up an unholy mess from the TIGER imports. Now that you understand the schema, feel free to repair the details.
bhietsch (2023-10-23 17:14:38+00:00): Some of my favorite spots to go hiking! I'm finding new trails there all of the time. But sorry to hear your visit was under those circumstances.

Thanks for the input and hard work you put into cleaning up all of the admin boundaries!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-26 22:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-26 22:33:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-08-28 08:09:50+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089336225 (one of sixty four objects). What is the meaning of the tag Taller A = 7mo ?
Ainat14 (2022-08-26 02:38:40+00:00): :D
Ainat14 (2022-08-26 02:37:55+00:00): :D
archpdx (2022-08-26 17:33:02+00:00): Hi,

It looks like this road is signed as 'Canby-Marquem Highway':
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=45.226857~-122.679573&lvl=19&dir=269.42917&pi=-1.281045&style=x

Please note that in OSM map the name that's found on the ground, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

'State Highway 170' is already listed as an alternate name for this stretch of road, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746478313
user_5359 (2023-07-13 14:59:56+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/14480287/history (version 9). You add the tag service=orange. What is the mean of this tag?
mycota (2023-07-13 15:19:56+00:00): That must have been a mistake when I was copying over tags for the hiking relation. I’m away from home and only on mobile, so feel free to delete it. Otherwise I can delete it in a few days. Thanks for catching that!
user_5359 (2023-07-13 15:25:03+00:00): done!
ralley (2022-08-26 20:16:24+00:00): Please do not use the name tag  to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385141
Diacritic (2022-08-27 10:49:57+00:00): The way you have modelled 203222828 is wrong.

I have already explained, at length why it is wrong on previous edits. These changes are making the map functionally worse.

Please don't duplicate ways without physical separation. Wilfull disregard of accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385171
mvexel (2022-09-01 14:14:02+00:00): Thanks for the quick add! Within hours of opening, I think?
TheConductor (2022-09-02 02:05:49+00:00): Just about I think! I read the article about the opening on KSL and added it.
TheConductor (2022-09-02 02:06:05+00:00): I've been waiting to add it for way to long!
gscholz (2022-09-30 08:59:52+00:00): Hi Samirmb,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-77.94822&lat=0.60879&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125385295

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-06 07:59:31+00:00): Hi Samirmb, 
due to your missing response I have remove this way now.
Guido