piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AntMadeira (2021-07-28 17:00:25+00:00): Olá, Garmin-User.
Reparei que passaste estes limites admin_level=9 para historic, mas chamo a atenção de que a etiqueta border_type não deve ser eliminada, mas mudada para border_type=historic_parish.

Podes corrigir isso nas edições que já fizeste, por favor?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
user_177389 (2021-07-28 20:57:29+00:00): Hello António,

yes I will do it.

Best regards,

Mario
user_177389 (2021-07-28 21:28:45+00:00): Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108780539

(There were a couple of previous edits too.)
AntMadeira (2021-07-29 02:09:31+00:00): Thank you a lot for your help, Mario.

Do you intend to change some more boundaries? Are you following some pattern (by county, district, etc.)?
If you want to help with this task, please contact me via my OSM profile.

Regards,
António.
Marek-M (2021-08-12 14:38:54+00:00): Cześć, trochę przesadziłeś z tą proponowaną DW 472. Chyba małe szanse na realizację, skoro 3 lata później stworzono inne warianty dojazdu do obwodnicy metropolitarnej. Proponuję wycofać zmianę. Warianty przebiegu dojazdu do obwodnicy metropolitarnej wrzuciłem kiedyś na mapę http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pl/map/przebieg-wariantow-drogowych-do-wezow-obwodnicy-me_479595 i to chyba na razie wystarczy. Nie ma sensu zaśmiecać OSM danymi, które są mało prawdopodobne w realizacji.
Marek-M (2021-10-12 05:13:45+00:00): Wycofałem zmianę w changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112399468
pacman541 (2021-07-29 05:49:37+00:00): Территория вокруг уже отмечена как больница, отдельно здание не нужно помечать больницей.
prudhraj (2021-07-30 12:43:00+00:00): Hi Timothy J Cason, please help us understand the reason behind deleting the name on this road segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465663704). Also 'Tiger data' suggests the name as 'Olive Street'.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108771306
Timothy J Cason (2021-07-30 16:28:14+00:00): It looks like that is an error on my part. Although, I work for the Tribal government here and our GIS dataset has this labeled as 'Olive Road' so now I'm not sure what it should be. I will follow up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108771306
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 17:17:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 108612640, 108612860.
SekeRob (2021-07-28 17:17:41+00:00): Forgot in the comment, most enclosed by a woodland area.
maraf24 (2021-07-31 12:00:34+00:00): Proszę nie przerabiać parku jako obszaru na węzeł. Jest to błąd, gdyż skutkuje utratą informacji.
PT-53 (2021-07-29 07:23:12+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
so groß ist Zwiefaltendorf doch gar nicht.  :-)
Grüße
OF-1 (2021-07-29 14:41:13+00:00): Hallo Peter,
bin wohl etwas vom Kurs abgekommen. ;-))
Grüße
Gregory UKR (2021-07-31 00:00:33+00:00): You know you should not be engaging into profanity unevidenced reverts. See changeset 108190529
olehz (2021-07-31 00:31:37+00:00): Я не понимаю, шо ты там пиздишь на псевдоинглише, ватник. пиздуй в рашку или днр эдитай
olehz (2021-07-31 00:36:37+00:00): Курица безлапая с мозгом альцгеймера. Иди иконки малюй в церкви, а не карты, там GPS привязка неважна. Не суй свои тухлые ватные руки в западную Украину!!!
Gregory UKR (2021-07-31 08:24:16+00:00): For the wellbeing of OSM community the best solution I see is for olehz to go on vacation
fkv (2022-02-03 09:36:09+00:00): zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968242591 :
Wildgehege schreibt man nicht mit Umlaut und ist kein Name, sondern ich würde nur barrier=fence und description=* und access=private setzen.
Interessant wär, ob das ein forstliches oder ein jagdliches Sperrgebiet ist und mit welcher Begründung. Sonst darf der Besitzer das Betreten gar nicht verbieten.
Gregory UKR (2021-07-31 00:00:10+00:00): You know you should not be engaging into profanity unevidenced reverts. See changeset 108190529
olehz (2021-07-31 00:38:25+00:00): Пшов нах, вата
olehz (2021-07-31 00:48:08+00:00): You know, u r vata. Nah v rashku!
Gregory UKR (2021-07-31 08:23:54+00:00): For the wellbeing of OSM community the best solution I see is for olehz to go on vacation
olehz (2021-07-31 08:46:40+00:00): Спасибі. У свою чергу бажаю тобі дотримуватись consistency у зсувах. В Україні 100500 проблемних місць, тому просив би не вандалити зигзагами регіони, де все більш-меньш ок, кожного разу як знімки оновляться. Будь-який знімок має похибку, на який біс лізти і перемальовувати їх кожного разу, тим більше так неякісно
Tramparam Parampampam (2021-07-28 18:22:55+00:00): good job.
gileri (2021-07-28 22:02:55+00:00): Bonjour, les tags indiquent toujours un passage piéton, est-ce normal ?
Gonéo (2021-07-29 06:29:08+00:00): Bonjour, en fait je l'ai laissé en tant que passage piéton non marqué, parce que la rue croise toujours le trottoir de l'avenue de Saxe à cet endroit.

Certains outils de guidage (comme OsmAnd) affichent un signal quand on approche d'un passage piéton (en mode voiture) et c'est intéressant.

Après comme on est en zone partagée ça n'a peut-être plus beaucoup de sens et si tu penses que c'est mieux on peut le retirer.
gileri (2021-07-29 09:38:18+00:00): À mon avis ça dépends s'il y a les autres signes qui laissent toujours penser à un passage piéton (trottoir abaissé, bande podotactile, feux etc). Mais en France les passages piétons sur la chaussé sont assez réglementés, donc s'il n'y a pas ou quasiment pas de signes laissant penser à un "vrai" passage piéton je pense qu'il vaut mieux l'enlever complètement, vu que c'est illégal de traverser ici.

À moins que le marquage soit enlevé temporairement pour cause de travaux ?
Gonéo (2021-07-29 10:11:38+00:00): En fait l'esplanade Moncey est piétonne. La rue Moncey est une zone de rencontre limitée à 20 km/h. Quand tu rentres dans cette rue en voiture tu coupes forcément le trottoir nord/sud de l'avenue de Saxe. Donc les piétons ont forcément le droit de traverser puisque c'est la continuité du trottoir. D'où le passage piéton.

La vue est à jour sur G. Street (je sais ça n'est pas une source) si tu n'es pas sur place. Pas la rue Moncey elle même mais tu peux te placer à la fin de la rue Vaudrey pour avoir la vue récente.
gileri (2021-07-29 10:40:28+00:00): Ok merci pour l'explication je comprends mieux !

Comme c'est une zone de rencontre, les piétons ont la priorité partout sur la rue, et peuvent donc traverser n'importe où sur toute la longueur.

S'il y avait le trottoir Av. M. de Saxe cartographié séparément ça aurait pu être utile, mais là ce passage piéton sur une seule voie l'est moins à mon avis.

Avertir sur (et se méfier de) la priorité piétonne qu'au début et non sur le reste de la voie n'est pas top je pense.
Gonéo (2021-07-29 11:11:02+00:00): Yep, tu as sans doute raison. Allez hop, je le supprime totalement.
gabro00 (2021-08-02 18:33:06+00:00): Szia!
A bringabolt helyén van a pékség?
Fazsoo (2021-08-02 18:46:58+00:00): Szia, nem, a bringás bezárt, mellette a patika, utána meg mi.
gabro00 (2021-08-02 18:58:27+00:00): Köszi, a bringaboltot ilyenkor érdemes shop=vacant, old_name=Mérey jármű címkékkel jelölni.

Ha a bolt a tiétek, melyik nyitvatartás mérvadó? Azért kérdem, mert a weboldalon lévő és a térképi adatok nem egyeznek. Egyelőre felvettem ami a weboldalon szerepel, aztán még lehet javítani.
Fazsoo (2021-08-02 19:08:55+00:00): köszi!
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:17:20+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:17:12+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:16:52+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:16:45+00:00): Added buildings
Baloo Uriza (2021-07-28 21:12:29+00:00): A school parking lot and driveway is "residential" now?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108774289
EZRouting (2022-03-16 14:10:07+00:00): Oh sorry, it should be a service road. I will remind my team to set road type correctly.
clay_c (2022-03-16 15:03:05+00:00): Could you provide more details about your "team" and its purpose? Please read the Organized Editing Guidelines and ensure that you are following them:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
SomeoneElse (2022-03-17 15:01:22+00:00): Hello EZRouting,
Thanks for replying to some of the questions that users have asked.
As clay_c mentioned above, you do need to follow the organised editing guidelines at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines .  Before any further edits, please do everything that you need to do to conform to those.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
EZRouting (2022-03-17 17:16:51+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse and clay_c. 
I'm following the guideline you shared with me and creating an Openstreetmap WIKI page. But it looks like it is just a user page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:EZRouting) instead of [[Organised Editing/Activities/Name of the Activity]] page. 
Could you give me some hints or instructions about how to create an Organised page? 

Thanks a lot!

Best regards,
Emma 
EZRouting
SomeoneElse (2022-03-17 17:58:53+00:00): Yes - have a look at the examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities#Sample_activities .  If you edit the source of that you can see the format needed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Organised_Editing/Activities&action=edit&section=3 .
You'll initially create two wiki pages - one about you and one about your activity.
The details you'll need to include there are shown at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines#Documentation_on_the_wiki .
EZRouting (2022-03-17 18:39:57+00:00): Thank you so much! I figured it out. I will work on the two new pages. Appreciate all the help! 

Have a great day!

Best,
Emma 
EZRouting
Yu_llis (2021-09-21 07:42:59+00:00): Неіснуюча дорога — лінія 962737499
SomeoneElse (2021-12-16 12:34:40+00:00): What is your source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968249778/history ?  The imagery suggests that it goes through a lake at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8957929736 .
SomeoneElse (2021-12-16 12:39:12+00:00): I can't see any sign of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968249777 west of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8957929634 , and it also runs through a lake?
literan (2021-07-29 17:46:52+00:00): Здравствуйте! условная линия дороги проводится по ее середине. Поэтому прилеплять площадные объекты к линиям дорог не стоит (получается, парковка начинается посередине дороги). Поправлю.
Konstantin Filippov (2021-07-30 08:10:19+00:00): Ок, спасибо
fabiotofy (2021-07-31 00:27:24+00:00): sembra più una prosecuzione di via delle vigne
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108774975
alessandrocarmeli (2021-07-31 00:40:40+00:00): Tranquillo, se guardi il mio changeset successivo ho corretto.
MKnight (2021-08-08 16:15:54+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565271783 von slight_right auf right geändert, warum?
Mah (2021-09-12 14:57:40+00:00): Versehen, ist korrigiert.
mueschel (2021-07-29 08:37:05+00:00): Hi,
could you check your conditional tags?
The common order of subkeys is

"electric_vehicle:lanes:forward:conditional"
Noen (2021-08-01 12:44:21+00:00): Hi! I was unsure on how to order these subkeys, because here's no documentation on the wiki on how to combine the "lanes" and "conditional" scheme. 
But i se that "conditional" is supposed to come after direction, so i went with your order.
mueschel (2021-08-01 13:02:59+00:00): The more optional parts we have, the more complicated it gets...
I tried to write a summary of subkey order, and it turned out to be surprisingly universal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/OrderOfKeyParts
fabiotofy (2021-07-29 11:27:25+00:00): mah... l'unico civico di accesso è per Via Nazario Sauro 84. Sicuro di mettere Via Verdi ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108775534
alessandrocarmeli (2021-07-29 12:23:53+00:00): Una volta lì c’era il passaggio livello al posto del sottopasso di via marin, indifferentemente alla chiusura del pl dovrebbe restare via verdi
impiaaa (2021-07-29 14:08:02+00:00): There is clearly some sort of road here visible in imagery. The City of San José also has a rural access road here in their database. Perhaps it is not named that, or it is not public access, but those things can be fixed without removing it from the map.
impiaaa (2021-07-29 14:12:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset 108830757.
Supaplex (2021-07-29 02:05:52+00:00): Why do you exclude 亮島？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9408711
It is under the control of Taiwan
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-28 19:38:48+00:00): Hello NorthwestPAmapper,

why did you remove the building and the roads? On Mapbox Satellite there are visible?

Cheers
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-28 22:25:21+00:00): it's been demolished recently, I went past it yesterday in person
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 06:13:17+00:00): alright, thanks for responding ;-)
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-31 16:04:55+00:00): you're welcome, my bad should've made it clear before
DressyPear4 (2021-07-28 21:39:50+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108776677
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-28 19:24:15+00:00): Maybe we can add replace building=yes by building=toilets? Or something like building=sanitary or building=sanitary_facility?

Just an idea...

Cheers
ralley (2021-07-28 20:34:21+00:00): Without local knowledge I cannot determine if the building is entirely used for sanitary purposes or if the tag just represents a toilet in a building.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 06:03:37+00:00): good point
tekim (2021-07-29 01:07:34+00:00): Hi Axel,  Thanks for the edits!  Many of us in the community like to see changesets with smaller geographic extents.  It makes it easier to review.     
    
Also, this edit may fall under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 
   
I did notice in a least one case, there was an address, and an outline of a building, but no building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874944082  

As aside, i read some of your observations about the differences between the US and Germany, which I found very interesting.  I have visited Germany, and my ancestors came from there.  I see you are in St. Paul, I grew up just west of Minneapolis.  

Mike T (osm: tekim)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108777070
AxelBoldt (2021-07-29 03:21:49+00:00): Hi Mike,

I'll make sure to keep my changesets smaller in the future. I made the edits by hand but I overlooked that that building was missing a tag. 

Cheers,
  Axel
tekim (2021-07-29 14:41:45+00:00): Hi Axel,
Thanks for your nice reply and willingness to try to keep the bounding boxes of your changesets smaller.

As someone with an interest in computer science, you probably realize there should be a technical solution to this, both on the creation side, as well as on the review side (a tool to only show changesets that really have a change in one's area of interest), but I don't think we are there yet.

Yes, things can get overlooked.  I look back on some of the things I mapped ten years ago and can't believe I did what I did.

Mike
ovruni (2021-07-28 21:02:31+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambio se han retirado etiquetas amenity para cambiarlas por healthcare, las cuales no son un reemplazo. Por otra parte se ha utilizado la etiqueta de hospital, que se encuentra destinado para hospitales, no para un centro de salud. Estos nodos fueron agregados como parte del proceso de importación. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Health_centers_import_in_Peru
ovruni (2021-07-31 07:17:58+00:00): Acá le dejo un enlace a los otros comentarios que se le ha enviado http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12178847
fabiotofy (2021-07-29 11:24:15+00:00): alla fine hanno realizzato una ciclabile o è ancora tutto interdetto ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108777798
eggie (2021-07-29 06:26:03+00:00): Ha Mathijs..
Tip: 
Je zou eens naar editor JOSM kunnen kijken dan heb je ook meer mogelijkheden.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Een recentere luchtfoto is ook beschikbaar. Zal in iD ook wel werken.
Zie ook forumdraadje .. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=836078#p836078
nieuwste layers OSGeo  PDOK 

 

https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wms/v1_0?&request=GetCapabilities&service=wms 

geoforum pdok actueel links 

https://geoforum.nl/t/nieuwe-url-s-voor-de-pdok-luchtfoto/5157   

 

Via forum deze links? Nog niet geprobeerd 

https://www.pdok.nl/introductie/-/article/luchtfoto-pdok 

(volgens mij dezelfde link) 

Mapse
eggie
Mathijs Romans (2021-08-12 08:09:26+00:00): Dank voor de links. Ik zal er eens naar kijken, want met een foto werk je preciezer. In eerste instantie werkte de authorisatie via josm niet, maar dat komt misschien omdat het een oudere versie was.
robertogeb (2021-07-29 00:15:09+00:00): Hugoren, estoy rehaciendo por completo la Torre Espacio para mejiorar el 3D. De momento, la anterior la he puesto a un lado mientras acabo y luego las fusionaré. Por favor, de momento no trabajes en ella. Espero tenerla acabada para la próxima semana.
Hugoren Martinako (2021-07-29 08:00:45+00:00): Ah, OK, había empezado simplemente quitando unas etiquetas duplicadas (tanto de esta torre, como de la Cristal) y ya me fijé que había detalles incorrectos.
Puedes echar un ojo en https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=40.4792298&lon=-3.6875214&zoom=18&camera.theta=57.032&camera.phi=55.004, que ya se han desplegado, para ver si te cuadra cómo están las dos torres.
Aparte de este changeset, subí estos dos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108770962 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108778425.
Sabiendo que estás con ellos, decide tú ya si sigues o que, por mi parte las dejo como están.
Saludos
robertogeb (2021-08-03 17:53:09+00:00): Ya he finalizado los cambios y he incluido la quinta torre.
Hugoren Martinako (2021-08-18 12:06:45+00:00): Me quito el sombrero. Magnífico trabajo.

¿Usas kendzi para ir previsualizando o usas otras herramientas?

Saludos
robertogeb (2021-08-20 23:23:39+00:00): Gracias. Desgraciadamente no me funciona kendzi. Lo hago a mano y verifico con f4map u osmbuildings, aunque tardan varias horas desde que subes los cambios hasta que los puedes ver.
eggie (2021-07-29 05:58:21+00:00): Dag plweenink.. 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Het enig dat niet klopte was het feit dat de speeltuin (inner in de multipolygoon)  het grasveld (de outer) raakte. 
Dat valk had je dus gewoon los kunnen maken en iets kunnen verschuiven. 
Je kunt de leisure=playground ook gewoon op een node zetten. Dat geeft ook een symbool. 
MVG
eggie
plweenink (2021-07-29 13:40:20+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Bedankt voor de feedback.
Multipolygoons blijven lastig, dus voor de zekerheid is feedback altijd fijn.
Ik zal je tips de volgende keer meenemen.
mvg,
plweenink
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-28 20:10:15+00:00): meant to say updated tags
InfosReseaux (2021-07-29 13:12:49+00:00): Bonjour Copinmalin, merci pour ce suivi, en effet certaines lignes aériennes sont bien enfouies.

Dans ces modifications, je crois que certains poteaux ont été supprimés uniquement mais pas la ligne complète. Serait-ce possible de terminer, en tronçonnant la ligne pour ne supprimer que ce qui a été détruit sur le terrain svp ?

Merci par avance
Copinmalin (2021-08-01 16:27:32+00:00): je ne sais pas supprimer ou raccourcir la ligne, juste supprimer les poteaux.
Pouvez vous m'aider ?
InfosReseaux (2021-08-01 19:07:09+00:00): Je vois que vous y êtes finalement parvenu, merci beaucoup.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-22 07:44:25+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie Żabki!
literan (2021-08-01 11:41:11+00:00): сколько ж можно дубли плодить?
iWowik (2021-08-02 07:14:58+00:00): В худших традициях мапсми
SherbetS (2022-04-22 15:29:15+00:00): hello Tornado9989,

on this object,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8958159223

you used the tag man_made=communications_tower when in reality it is actually man_made=mast + tower:type=communication 

please use the correct tagging in the future.

thanks,
SherbetS
Lee Carré (2021-07-28 20:33:18+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
highflyer74 (2021-07-29 06:56:05+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, keine "Tests" in der Live Datenbank durchzuführen und quer durchs Land reichende Änderungen hochzuladen.

Ich vermute auch, dass die Antennen nicht den Namen "Sendeanlage" tragen...
-------------------------
CS Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108798974
Lokalfuerst (2021-10-02 13:44:20+00:00): Hallo, 
kann gar nicht nachvollziehen, was mit dem 'test' genau quer durchs Land geaendert wurde. Ok, allgemeiner Name 'Sendeanlage' muss nicht sein.
Gruss
moosfrosch (2023-09-13 20:33:20+00:00): Hallo, ich verstehe diese Bearbeitung nicht so recht. "Nicht erwünscht" ist keine Kategorie für OSM und auf persönliche Wünsche von Anliegern gehen wir nicht ein :)  Was ist dann da beschildert? Stimmen kann es sowieso nicht, denn hier führt ja der Wanderweg X6 durch, mit Relation hier, aber da für alle gesperrt geht das Routing nicht. Wolltest Du nur für Fahrzeuge sperren?
thimbleu (2023-09-13 22:05:57+00:00): Habe mir die Situation nochmals angesehen: es gibt ein Schild 250 mit Zusatz Privatweg und eine Drehschranke. Also nur Verbot für Fahrzeuge. Habe es in OSM bereits korrigiert.
moosfrosch (2023-09-14 07:07:59+00:00): Danke! Was ist mit Fahrrädern, sind die auch gesperrt?
thimbleu (2023-09-15 07:57:11+00:00): Ja, das Befahren mit Fahrrädern ist untersagt.
Das Verkehrsschild "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art" mit der VZ 250 verbietet die Ein- und Durchfahrt für Fahrzeuge aller Art. Wer zu Fuß unterwegs ist, darf den gesperrten Bereich jedoch passieren und dabei auch ein Fahrrad oder Motorrad schieben. Das Fahrverbot im angezeigten Bereich umfasst alle Abzweigungen, die nur über die gesperrte Straße zugänglich sind.
ottwiz (2021-07-28 20:59:41+00:00): Note that Taconic State Park - Copake Falls area's tagging has been changed, because it had wrong tagging.. But many of the stuff there has the wrong tagging, if you have the time, then fix them, please.
Cristoffs (2022-01-08 21:30:20+00:00): Proszę nie mapuj przy pomocy MapWithAi pełno błędów zrobiłeś ...
eggie (2021-07-29 05:52:14+00:00): Beste GeoWandelaar.

Accesstags zijn echt lastig in het begin om te doorgronden
Voor wie is het hier afgesloten. Voor wandelaars routeert het nu ook niet meer.
De combinatie access=no met een andere accesstag is bijna altijd fout.
Dus niemand mag hier verder bejalve een fietser. Zodra hij afstapt zit hij/zij fout?
Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 06:03:23+00:00): Dus 
motor_vehicle=no
ipv access=no

en evt als brommers wel verder mogen

moped=yes
mofa=yes

access=no is bijna altijd 'fout'' 

Ik pas even wat aan... dan moet je straks maar eens kijken.

Kijk ook hier hoe te taggen bij verboden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 06:12:18+00:00): Aangepast.. De parkeerplaats Rood Wit heb ik wel bereikbaar gehouden voor motorvoertuigen.
GeoWandelaar (2021-07-29 18:49:36+00:00): Dit is inderdaad andere koek dan de echte bospaden die ik in het verleden heb toegevoegd. Zoals het er nu uitziet, is het precies wat het is.
Aan beide zijden van het stuk staat het bord "verboden voor auto's en motoren", maar wellicht was het een retorische vraag.
Dank voor het aanpassen, ik zal de diverse instructies eens goed bekijken,
Arthur / GeoWandelaar
GeoWandelaar (2021-07-29 18:50:42+00:00): Bord C12 dus.
eggie (2021-07-29 19:54:35+00:00): Oke... Dat bord kun je nog evt. toevoegen met traffic_sign=NL:C12 op het bewuste wegdeel.

MVG
eggie
OddlyAngled (2021-08-02 15:24:28+00:00): curious, did the use trail from New Army to Langley disappear? it was pretty prominent back in 2016 or 17 and (iirc) was showing up on the Strava heatmap as of last year.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108780831