piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-10-02 08:13:31+00:00): Ciao,
ai percorsi e a ogni oggetto in generale devi assegnare almeno un tag (etichetta) che indichi al sistema cosa rappresenta
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features
sanchi (2017-09-22 12:30:00+00:00): No estaba correcto. Corregido en conjunto de cambios: 52274877.
Las etiquetas de la numeración se ponen en los portales. Estaba también puesto en la vía cosa que no sería correcta.
Para el número de portal en vez de addr:unit se usa addr:housenumber.
Con esto ya debería salir bien en los programas de guiado por GPS.
Aunque ya esta correcto, para que este aun mejor se pueden etiquetar cada portal por separado en vez de solo el primero y el último.
jfdeza (2017-09-22 14:26:15+00:00): Muchas gracias por la aclaración.
ndm (2017-09-21 11:54:06+00:00): No change set comment!

I'll revert this asap - there was a definite separation of the bus lane with an island - unless you've done a recent on site survey.
Hjart (2017-09-21 09:10:08+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Pas dog venligst på ikke at rykke med addresser (jeg har måttet flytte en enkelt tilbage her)
canfe (2019-05-24 13:46:23+00:00): Quadrivio?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2034404787
Jrachi (2019-05-24 16:01:36+00:00): Si è orribile, quanto il "Sentiero forestale", applicato anche a più sentieri.
Ci pensi tu a contattare solitone?
user_5359 (2017-09-21 19:17:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the administration baoundery of Miami. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the boundary) to add your business information.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 09:12:23+00:00): Hello Hagar66. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526444387 you have tagged `tactile_pavind` instead of `tactile_paving`, right? #typo
WiebkeCHH (2017-09-22 18:47:46+00:00): Love itz! MY very own personal quality assurance! :-) I fixed both mistakes. Feel welcome to correct such obvious flaws yourself if you like! Thx much!
ndm (2017-09-21 20:13:10+00:00): Is this really being built at the moment?
robw (2017-09-21 20:21:15+00:00): Without going to have a look I can't confirm.  But this is what seems to have been decided and it is supposed to start about now, so may still only be planned (as per my comment).   Clearly it's not yet open so nothing is going to be using it for routing.
ndm (2017-09-21 21:13:36+00:00): Assume you checked any plans would have had a suitable copyright for copying into OSM? Not sure about including potential planned items -- or I'd already have added Bristol Arena :-)
robw (2017-09-22 06:13:40+00:00): Dont think is a real problem as for example the A14 huntigdon-cambridge upgrade was shown on  OSM far before any work commenced on the ground.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:25:30+00:00): Also check the spelling of `consctruction` at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526438762
trigpoint (2017-09-22 13:48:12+00:00): Hi, the correct way to tag a closed pub is to change the amenity tag to disused:amenity=pub. I would leave the name in place if it is still visible.
Cheers Phil
Alecs01 (2017-09-22 15:37:44+00:00): Ciao Emanuele, cosa significa I/LO-392 nel nome della montagna? il picco peraltro è già presente, e sembra una posizione piuttosto precisa viste tutte le tracce gps che convergono lì https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/457470732 non va duplicato
jpennycook (2018-08-05 17:34:29+00:00): Hi.
In reply to your note on this changeset - roughly east of Thrashers Lane is access land, so pedestrian access will be allowed on many roads in the area. A lot of the roads joining the public bridleways seem to have signs only forbidding motor vehicles (if anything), implying that horses and bicycles may be permitted.

Jon
Shohreh (2018-08-05 18:07:41+00:00): Thanks for the confirmation.

As it would have been a very long detour even by bike to reach South Haven Point, I went ahead anyway… and was relieved to see pedestrians further East and then some NCN signs.
jpennycook (2018-08-08 17:57:40+00:00): I did some work yesterday on the east-west road from Wytch Heath as far as the bridleway to Ower Quay, and the north-south road from Rempstone/Bushey Lane to the east-west road, based on the signs.  I'll do some more work on the other roads and tracks in the Rempstone Estate when I get chance.
user_5359 (2017-09-21 19:09:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
user_5359 (2017-09-21 19:10:03+00:00): If you need, You are welcome!
Hjart (2017-09-21 10:25:35+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Bemærk at jeg har foretaget nogle mindre rettelser. Specielt vil jeg nævne private adgangsveje som du i et par tilfælde har klassificeret som "tertiærveje", men bedre tagges som https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Tag:service%3Ddriveway
DD1GJ (2017-09-22 07:23:12+00:00): I think, that man_made=pipeline is more important than man_made=cutline. Also cutline should only be used, if there is no highway.
Hjart (2017-09-21 10:53:30+00:00): "machine gun mappers" :-D
Se i den forbindelse https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078726.html
eggie (2017-09-21 12:31:31+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-21 12:43:10+00:00): waarschijnlijk is het hele fietspad hier moped=designated, want het is een 70 km weg. 'k heb daar bicycle=no toegevoegd.
arvdk (2017-09-21 21:56:09+00:00): Hoi Mathieu Guillaume,
Welkom. Goed dat je het fietspad hebt aangesloten. Op http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52239908 kan je goed zien hoe je ook de keerlus veranderd hebt. Ik denk onterecht, want de lus gaat hier om een stukje gras/bomen heen. Dat is te zien met de PDOK kaart. Leg je de straat weer terug?
eggie (2017-09-21 12:37:18+00:00): bicycle=yes en foot= yes kan er af, want op een fietspad mag je immers fietsen (en lopen in dit geval). 
Haal je die tags er zelf af? 
Wanneer een brommer er moet/mag rijden komt er moped=designated bij. 
Graag reactie.
DoDoMR (2017-09-21 13:31:01+00:00): Ich verstehe deine Änderung nicht. Seit wann hat McDonalds im Marburger Hauptbahnhof eine zweite Filiale eröffnet? Aus meiner Sicht dürfte die Außenterrasse nicht noch zusätzlich mit amenity=fast_food getagged werden - leisure=outdoor_seating ist hier vollkommen ausreichend.
Weltstaat (2017-09-21 14:02:16+00:00): Das kann man sicher so sehen. Ich werde den Tag wieder entfernen.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-23 19:27:11+00:00): Did you check any of these shops you 'corrected'? It turn out that Peak Berlin had closed 2017-08-31.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 03:53:58+00:00): Hi Polarbear,

no I changed the syntax of the tag "opening_hours" not by checking the information itself. (syntax no content)
The change was part of a project to develop a AI assistant and we used the harmonized data as a base.

With a few years of distance and more experience I developed another view on this and would do this type of change in this way. So if you found any issues, please feel free to change it without consideration of this changeset.

Best regards,
Chriss
jsphu (2017-09-21 12:08:05+00:00): Added via app maps.me because it missed. But in openstreet map it already excists. Cant delete via mobile website.
AdVerburg (2017-09-21 19:45:03+00:00): Camping Schippers (Way: Camping Schippers (520496348) ) was already on the map, so now it's twice. This is not the good way to do.
An other item is in your new Node: Campsite Schippers (5119478321) the address date are a duplicate of the building just north of this node. Double addresses in OSM is simpy an error.
So I suggest to remove this contribution.
An other odd thing is Node: Reception (5073015361) , an office in the open air on grass. May be this is situated on Node 6 Baanstpoldersedijk in the building?
eggie (2017-10-03 11:36:16+00:00): Ik heb ook al om reactie gevraagd bij landuse adits met mp's maar geen reactie gekregen. Jij wel AD.
Net nog onder het mappen een PB gestuurd.
De landuse verdwijnt nu omdat Sdhu de outer Multi omzet in natural= yes.. wat dat ook mogen betekenen.
Verder zie ik nergens commentaar.
De laatste changeset zal ik zelf herstellen of reverten als ik geen reactie krijg.
eggie (2017-10-03 12:15:43+00:00): Ad.. laatste changeset hersteld en om reactie gevraagd. De camping heb ik laten aansluiten op de landuse. oospronkelijke 3dshapes is verwijderd door mapper. Misschien slaat de info op een shop op de node?
Svalbard (2017-09-21 16:57:10+00:00): Hallo Aleks-Berlin,

bei Deiner Änderung hast Du von Deinen Main Rules diese ein wenig außer Acht gelassen: 2. Avoid private keys/tags without wiki and check for available existing ones.  ;-)

Den key "farmland" gibt es nach meiner Recherche nicht und den Wert "mea" für landuse kann ich im Wiki auch nicht finden.

Korrigierst Du das oder soll ich das übernehmen?

Gruß

Svalbard
Aleks-Berlin (2017-09-21 18:05:54+00:00): Ja, du hast recht. Jetzt wiki/Proposed_features/farmland + farmland-key gelassen. Ansonsten müsste man tausende Keys löschen. Jedoch führte es teilweise zu Verärgerung, wenn ich in der Vergangenheit zu sehr aufgeräumt habe. Ich hätte gern eine Sperre in OSM: neue keys müssen beantragt werden und nur mit Wiki vorher. Alles andere fliegt nach ein paar Tagen automatisch raus und der User wird vorher gewarnt über den Revert. Es gibt tausende Tippfehler, leere Keys, leere Values, es ist manchmal ermüdend..
Viele Grüße Alexander
DaCor (2017-09-27 02:53:08+00:00): Hi Ian, you asked for a review of your mapped feature. the apartments look good. Feel free to add more features to your locality
Hjart (2017-09-21 11:58:05+00:00): Vær venligst forsigtig med ikke at rykke med adresser (i dette tilfælde 2 stk ovre i Vedersø Klit)
eggie (2017-09-21 13:28:25+00:00): Zo kan het ook, maar het nadeel is zodra zo'n ark weg is dat men met de delete-actie de houseboat met adres en al weggegooit. Het adres in de BAG staat echter op een deel van de wal en het water en dat kan ook daar blijven als de ark of het schip tijdelijk weg is. Vandaar dat we de oplosssing hadden gevonden van mooring=private met alle kadastergegevens. Vaak staat er ook nog een opstal op de oever. We hebben na de BAG import deels  die ligplaatsen omgetagd naar mooring, maar niet alles. Even ter overweging.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-01 17:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107272257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism around Armenia / Azerbaijan.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-July/086696.html .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-01 17:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107272257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism around Armenia / Azerbaijan.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-July/086696.html .
Hjart (2017-09-21 12:09:51+00:00): Du fik her rykket et punkt i en cykelsti ved Jasminvænget over på Sandhusvej. Jeg har rettet dette, men prøv venligst at undgå dette fremover.
R0bst3r (2017-09-25 20:26:47+00:00): Hallo newdataservices,
building:levels=0 ist hier sicherlich falsch, da das Gebäude mehr als 0 Etagen hat. Ich habe das entfernt.
Viele Grüße
newdataservices (2017-09-26 06:08:00+00:00): moin R0bst3r,
bei Google Maps kann man das Gebäude von Außen erkennen. Ich bin daher erstmal von 0 Etagen ausgegegangen.

https://www.google.de/maps/place/F4U+Oldenburg/

Beste Grüße
Karsten
TourenbikerFKB (2017-09-26 16:13:56+00:00): Der Schattenwurf läßt deutlich erkennen, dass das Gebäude mindestens ein Erdgeschoss hat. Das zählt auch als Etage.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-09-26 16:19:47+00:00): Gerade nochmal die Definition von level angesehen. Erdgeschoss wird tatsächlich als level=0 gemappt. Nehme alles zurück. Oder mache ich einen Denkfehler?
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 17:02:36+00:00): Achtung! Building:levels bedeutet Anzahl der Etagen oder Stockwerke eines Hauses. level=0 alleine an einem Node, z.B. einem Laden bedeutet der Laden befindet sich im Erdgeschoss.
Das erste ist 3D Tagging, das zweite Indoor Tagging.
Gruß R0bst3r
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:30:08+00:00): Hello Hilton Hotels. You have tagged `contact:Instagram` instead of `contact:instagram`, right? And please check all the values of your contact values and before have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact. There you can see, that username without the leading url is enough.
Hilton Hotels (2017-09-25 07:52:07+00:00): Hello Harald,

Thank you for your message. We will perform the updates you kindly pointed right away.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:33:03+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
jaap de vries (2017-09-21 13:52:57+00:00): Heb je een pb gestuurd, lees die even goed door alvorens je weer gaat bijwerken op OSM.
nevw (2017-09-22 00:18:21+00:00): Hi
the syntax for your opening hours needs amending.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
mike140 (2017-09-21 19:06:56+00:00): На линейные объекты, такие как дренажный канал не нужно ставить тег natural=water - его ставят только на площадные объекты
VARVAR8 (2017-09-22 16:48:05+00:00): Дякую. Вчора вже я про це прочитав... буду знати
frosm (2017-09-21 14:36:28+00:00): Bonjour,
je réagis à votre demande de vérification de votre contribution.
D'abord merci pour celle-ci.
Le sens unique est bien indiqué.
cependant vous avez aussi rajouté lanes=9 ce qui signifie 9 bandes de circulations, cela me parait élevé :)
frosm (2017-10-09 09:07:44+00:00): j'ai supprimé le tag lanes=9
Josef73 (2019-03-23 09:39:04+00:00): Hello, what means the opening_hours & opening_hours1 at the node "Gianni Crisanti Barber Shop" (4014146589) ?
fayor (2019-03-23 15:38:55+00:00): Perché chiedi a me? Se guardi la cronologia il nodo è stato creato da un altro utente https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4014146589/history
Josef73 (2019-03-24 18:05:02+00:00): sorry.
Nakaner (2017-09-21 19:23:04+00:00): Hallo Weltstaat,

wenn du Bahnsteige als Multipolygone erfasst, dann musst du

1. railway=platform und public_transport=platform von den Mitgliedern entfernen und

2. die Multipolygonrelation muss in den Routenrelationen, die vorher den Bahnsteig-Way referenziert haben, den Bahnsteig ersetzen.

Könntest das bitte korrigieren?

Schau bitte auch sonst nochmal über den Bahnhof. Es schadet nicht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5119434334 ist dir beim Auswählen der zu verschiebenden Objekte durch die Lappen gegangen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Weltstaat (2017-09-21 19:52:31+00:00): Hi Michael,
die Fehler sind mir bewusst. Leider musste ich heute meine Bearbeitung unterbrechen, weil JOSM aus irgendeinem Grund streikt. Neuinstallation, Update zurückrollen etc. hat alles nichts geholfen :/ Hoff es funktioniert morgen, dann erledige ich das. 
Grüße,
Jonathan
Weltstaat (2017-09-21 19:54:09+00:00): Achja, railway=platform_edge an der entsprechenden Kante des MPs, wie hier gemacht geht auch nicht?
Nakaner (2017-09-21 20:07:20+00:00): railway=platform_edge ist nicht das Problem, sondern das public_transport=platform. In die Routenrelationen kommt die Fläche, derzeit als Multipolygon modelliert und nicht die Bahnsteigkante.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 09:02:09+00:00): Hello kayle. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104160658 you have tagged `roof:levals` instead of `roof:levels`, right? #typo
kayle (2017-09-22 09:03:24+00:00): Yes, will fix it.
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 11:51:59+00:00): Hallo rd911ra,
ich habe die area=yes Flächen zu Gebäuden geändert. Solche Flächen werden eigentlich selbst von iD angemeckert beim Hochladen. Bitte auf solche Hinweise achten!
Viele Grüße
woodpeck (2017-09-22 08:44:01+00:00): Please explain why you have uploaded a village boundary with name:en="we are evil"?
woodpeck (2017-10-04 10:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
woodpeck (2017-09-22 09:05:14+00:00): what does "cop=do not share" mean on this boundary?
woodpeck (2017-10-04 10:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:09:34+00:00): Hello kwaku_boateng. What is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52649387 for? I can't see any osm relevant information there. Is this an imported shape(file)?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 09:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
Hjart (2017-09-21 14:14:55+00:00): Please note that they were allready mapped with a cycleway=track on the road. Please also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
drkt (2017-09-21 16:09:20+00:00): I have corrected this. I wasn't aware you could tag bike paths onto roads, since someone had started mapping the sidewalks in great detail.
Imperator Lrrr (2017-10-08 19:02:23+00:00): Dopisywanie tego typu prywatnych nazw lub komentarzy do obiektów na OSM jest niezgodne z zasadami i nie powinno być praktykowane.
Usunąłem.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 05:45:26+00:00): Hello Boggedy. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525894765 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452813491 look a little bit mistagged, right?
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 10:24:22+00:00): Hallo rd911ra,
der Süden sieht ganz gut aus, ein paar Tipps:
* Erfasse POIs entweder am Gebäude oder als Punkt, nicht beides, ansonsten findet jemand 2 Apotheken, obwohl nur eine existiert.
* Bitte keine Häuserecken für irgendetwas anderes als Hausecken verwenden, z.B. sind Ecken keine Bushaltestellen.
* Gebäude konnen mit Rechtsklick über das Kontextmenu rechtwinklig gemacht werden. Tastenkürzel wäre 'S'.
Viele Grüße und viel Erfolg noch!
Imperator Lrrr (2017-10-08 19:01:44+00:00): Dopisywanie tego typu prywatnych nazw lub komentarzy do obiektów na OSM jest niezgodne z zasadami i nie powinno być praktykowane.
Usunąłem.
venkanna37 (2017-09-26 04:40:08+00:00): you added buildings, but you not gave the tag (building = yes ), please check once
lakedistrict (2017-09-23 11:47:18+00:00): Hi nickharri,
Thanks for your edits to the paths and cairns. I notice that you requested a review so I'm just letting you know that they all look good to me. Any questions just ask.
Happy mapping, lakedistrict :)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:10:09+00:00): Hello osm ebenezer. What is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526500550 for? I can't see any osm relevant information there. Is this an imported shape(file)?
literan (2017-09-22 16:36:14+00:00): вся правка некорректная. Откачу. Если интересно почему - пишите
literan (2017-09-22 16:02:52+00:00): если для всех доступ private - то достаточно общего тега access=private. Поправлю
Alexander Fedorov (2017-09-29 11:53:05+00:00): Ок, спасибо!
woodpeck (2017-09-22 09:08:10+00:00): This is an undiscussed import that not only introduces a wrong key ("lenght") but also seems to be totally out of sync with available aerial imagery. Please follow the OSM import guidelines, and discuss such imports before you execute them. The imports will be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 09:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
rskedgell (2024-08-30 10:50:22+00:00): Unlikely to be on the carriageway of Longstone Avenue and without an address, it's not much use and unlikely to be verifiable on the ground. Deleted.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 09:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
joost schouppe (2017-09-25 18:36:18+00:00): Hi Ratrun,
This was a wrong correction. It wasn't mapped properly, but I was pretty sure there was no through traffic allowed. Your change allows quite strange routing options. There was a note on this bit of road, to mark it for surveying (846771).
ratrun (2017-09-27 15:57:29+00:00): Thanks for the correction. I didn't notice the note, it was not visible in the data and also not from bing images.
joost schouppe (2017-09-27 16:40:43+00:00): Thanks for the reply!
You might consider switching on notes in your editor. Also, in Brussels and Flanders "AGIV Flanders most recent aerial imagery" is much better, in terms of age and resolution. A bit of a pity that JOSM doesn't seem to have an indication of "best available" imagery...
majid1359 (2017-09-21 14:48:50+00:00): نان فانتزی دو تا اسم مشابه بود یکی حذف شد
mavl (2017-09-21 17:26:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  

Не нужно в названии объекта указывать его категорию (Кафе, АГЗС, Гостиница "Иван-Чай"). В названии должно быть только название (Иван-Чай). Подробнее о названиях в статье [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F]  
  
Тип объекта в OpenStreetMap определяется не по названию, а по специальному признаку (тегу), например amenity=cafe для кафе.  
  
Английское название (name:en=Cafe, name:en=Motel) также следует этому правилу. Это должно быть общепринятое в этом (в данном случае, английском) языке название заведения. Motel и Cafe это не названия на английском. Не нужно их указывать. Они однозначно определяются по тегам amenity=cafe и tourism=motel.  
  
Пожалуйста, исправьте эти ошибки.  
  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].
eggie (2017-09-21 17:59:39+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
pwbriggs (2026-07-12 00:11:33+00:00): Hello Leon,

Do you, by any chance, remember what you meant by service_times=24/7 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5119897590/history/1? I've been researching that tag a bit and wanted to know if this usage was just a mistake because of iD presets or something like that.

Happy mapping!
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-03-20 09:59:00+00:00): Według http://lagowswiebodzinski.e-mapa.net/ w Toporowie nie ma ulicy Nowej, a ciągle jest ulica PGR. Co mam z tym zrobić?
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-03-20 10:05:33+00:00): Problem z SIeniawą-Osiedlem Górniczym już rozwiązany - w OSM była błędna adresacja.
Anazaar (2018-03-20 10:56:21+00:00): Według http://lagowswiebodzinski.e-mapa.net/ punkty adresowe w Sieniawie parę razy były zmieniane i co chwilę jest to wywracane na lewą stronę. :-)
Ulice w OSM - Łagów i Toporów są zgodne ze stanem faktycznym (chyba że ktoś korygował)
Na http://lagowswiebodzinski.e-mapa.net/ ... tam mają sporo nieścisłości np.:
-w Łagowie ul.Promenada jest błędnie naniesiona (od września chyba) i adresy z tym związane.
-w Toporowie ta ul.Nowa

Nie można się za bardzo sugerować ich http://lagowswiebodzinski.e-mapa.net/ 

Nikt chyba tam nad tym nie panuje.
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-03-20 11:15:09+00:00): No to trzeba znaleźć sposób, żeby zaczęli nad tym panować :-)