piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GinaroZ (2016-09-21 20:45:39+00:00): Sorry, I don't see how it is confusing - notice boards are a type of information board, therefore board_type=notice is perfectly usable. 
How does creating a new tag make things less confusing? Especially as it doesn't provide any new information about the type of board or indicate it is a church notice board.
seattlefyi (2016-08-29 03:20:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit, removing the closed restaurant! Just to let you know, deleting the whole node removes the address data as well, which might be still valid (though the restaurant data is obsolete). There is a way to remove tags one by one. I've already put the address back in for that place. BTW, welcome back, I looked at your history and saw you started editing 8 years ago?! That's impressive. Hope to see you continue to edit OSM! Thanks again!
Taso (2016-08-29 04:23:29+00:00): Thanks for the info!

There are a couple of other POIs that are closed which i was going to take similar action on, so will follow your example.

I guess the right thing to do when creating a poi is to edit an existing address node if it exists?

And if a POI has closed, only delete the entire node if an address node already exists with the same address?
seattlefyi (2016-08-29 04:49:02+00:00): Great. Glad to help. If you want to keep it simple, you can create a new node just for the new POI. If the poi addr node exists, yes you can add to it. But if the poi shares the street # with other pois, but has a unit # (such as suite A) you can also make a new node copy with the same # but add an "addr:unit = A" tag. I would only delete poi nodes whose tags all no longer apply, or is an exact duplicate (no unit #) of another node.
herman17 (2016-09-08 21:05:16+00:00): Дороги не соединены, нужно будет доделать, чтоб было грамотно (хотя, я думаю, что вы знаете и оставили это на потом). И чисто на мой взгляд, лучше бы было сделать просто дорожки, нежели area, так как внутри все-таки находятся бутики, которые преграждают свободный путь и выглядит эта серая площадка слишком привлекающе, а подземные дорожки имеют более понятный рендер. Спасибо.
Thunder08 (2016-11-08 11:54:24+00:00): Уже не помню эту свою правку. Сейчас уже всё нормально.
Gustavo de Vargas Dias (2016-09-10 00:24:35+00:00): Não é bem um parque, já fui lá, mas e quase isso, lá tem área de paraquedistas, as vezes balões e tal...
adrianojbr (2016-09-11 17:25:56+00:00): não seria melhor, então, mapear com etiquetas de área para voo livre (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying)?
Gustavo de Vargas Dias (2016-08-30 22:49:25+00:00): Olá, adrianojbr! É mesmo um calçadão, inaugurado no meio deste ano, a edição foi feita por mim mesmo, se você achou um erro, a melhor solução não seria apagar, e sim me comunicar, vendo o histórico de edições...
adrianojbr (2016-09-11 17:44:24+00:00): continuo achando que não é um calçada e vou explicar o motivo no changeset no qual você os recriou no mapa. eu até poderia ter entrado em contato contigo, mas eu corrijo tanta coisa no estado, de tantos mapeadores diferentes, se for entrar em contato com todo mundo, abandono os mapeamentos ;) abraço.
adrianojbr (2016-09-11 17:44:51+00:00): *não é um calçadão
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 17:57:32+00:00): Already on the map, as some other objects you added, please do not duplicate objects, you're not creating personal notes, your edits are public to everyone in OpenStreetMap, thanks
user_5359 (2016-08-29 18:23:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
5m4u9 (2016-08-31 07:37:45+00:00): I will revert this change because this region don't wetland, is a desert. Please, write to talk-bo and expose your reason of the "new tags"
Carlos Brys (2016-08-29 11:39:22+00:00): ¿ La posición del nodo es correcta ?
¿ Cuál es el nombre del negocio ?
EinKonstanzer (2016-08-29 20:20:27+00:00): There is very likely no http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
And there is already a node with highway=bus_stop - see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1915010750/history
If you have question we'll try to help you as good as possible.
AlexDRL (2016-08-29 09:42:29+00:00): Please, leave the local names in spanish
sergeybe (2016-09-07 14:26:25+00:00): Пожалуйста не занимайтесь вандализмом. Правка откачена.
Владимир К (2016-08-29 14:00:13+00:00): так это замок сашенька или user?
ajashton (2016-08-29 19:58:47+00:00): These ways should not have coastline tags - they are part of a water multipolygon, not the coastline. There are no other coastline tags on the St Lawrence until further downriver http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/i5L
PlaneMad (2016-08-30 06:01:17+00:00): Removed the coastline tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41793432
mavl (2019-01-13 17:00:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:00:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:00:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:31:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
RicoElectrico (2016-08-29 13:26:31+00:00): Hej, o co chodzi z nazwą tego lasu tutaj?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130081247
przemas75 (2016-09-13 08:04:59+00:00): Dołączam się do pytania, skąd ta nazwa?
RicoElectrico (2016-09-13 09:14:59+00:00): W dalszym zestawie zmian jest opisane.
Supaplex (2016-08-29 09:08:07+00:00): 重覆囉
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607453375
mavl (2016-08-30 18:10:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Вы изменили номер дома по улице 30 лет Победы с 77 на 77А. Вы уверены, что это правильно? Дом № 77А уже обозначен:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101557993
mavl (2016-08-31 16:19:33+00:00): Ваши изменения отменены.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:31:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-08-29 19:39:00+00:00): There's a hotel named Cicerone two meters from there https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1412577264 is it the same?
Nakaner (2016-09-02 17:12:45+00:00): Dear Nzara,

elevators are mapped as nodes because they are a necessary routing information. The area of an elevator is tagged differently. Please also do not delete footways on platforms. They are necessary for routing. I will do a partial revert of this changeset and others with the same editing pattern.

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2016-09-02 17:41:12+00:00): Sorry, that's the wrong changeset. This comment should go to changeset 41770896.

Another question: Why did you remove name="Kronberger Bahn"?
Nzara (2016-10-01 05:39:02+00:00): During a survey on the ground I asked several local people 'Has this railway track a particular name?’ All replied ‘no’. However, the tracks belongs to the railway route named ‘Kronberger Bahn’. You find all information on this route – including the name – in relation 180529
Nakaner (2016-10-02 08:27:42+00:00): Es ist eine in Deutschland gebräuchliche Mappingpraxis, an der sich bislang noch niemand gestört hat, den gebräuchlichen Namen von Bahnstrecken als name=* an den Streckengleisen (in Bahnhöfen an den durchgehenden Hauptgleisen) zu erfassen. Bitte respektiere die Meinung der örtlichen Community und versuche nicht, eigene Mappingauffassungen durchzusetzen.
Nakaner (2016-09-02 17:42:12+00:00): partially reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41873774
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:31:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Владимир К (2016-09-01 05:49:56+00:00): Мусорки не надо подписывать
TheHammer (2016-09-07 07:51:40+00:00): I've fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439653639 by changing it from a trunk to a tertiary. Is "E19 Ninguno" the correct ref for this road?
Владимир К (2016-08-29 08:42:20+00:00): столовая обозначается amenity=fast_food+fast_food=cafeteria
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 13:58:35+00:00): These are personal MAPs.ME notes. They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-08-29 11:14:37+00:00): Hi dido3,
 I appreciate your effort in improving the map. In this changeset you have deleted many residential area which are surrounding the villages. Can I know the reason and behind this deletion?

Chetan
dido3 (2016-08-29 11:56:22+00:00): Hi. I am currently uploading a new very detailed polygon mosaic that is topologically clean. Old polygons will mess-up with the mosaic and have to be deleted.
MMN-o (2016-08-29 11:38:24+00:00): Hej! Superbra att du fixar till vägar utifrån Stravas data. För oss som prenumererar på ändringar för att identifiera t.ex. misstag/sabotage så underlättar det dock om ändringarna även har en kommentar (i ditt fall är det endast ".")

Så kan jag få önska att framtida ändringar anger det? Även om det bara är något så kort som "fixar cykelvägar" typ. .)

Och tack för ändringarna!
OTEC-Team (2016-08-29 09:27:14+00:00): Straße Ölpfad existiert nicht mehr und wird es auch nicht mehr geben. Fläche (P3) ist kein Parkplatz. Gelände ist eingezäunte Baustelle.
Firefishy (2016-11-05 20:27:18+00:00): Awesome first addition. Thank you for adding your local knowledge to the map.
Lesovichok (2017-11-26 15:35:34+00:00): Откуда информация, что вот этот непроходимый для легковушек переулок  является Дворцовым шоссе?www.openstreetmap.org/way/130116669
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:38:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:28:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Øukasz (2016-08-30 14:19:16+00:00): i can't see the changes...?
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-29 14:38:07+00:00): не стоит так уверенно удалять данные о местности, которую не знаете
f1mishutka (2016-08-29 14:41:19+00:00): Никогда не удаляю ничего в местности, которую не знаю.

Был там 27 августа на велике. На эти тропики там нету даже намёка. Очень интересные приключения отгрёб из-за того, что на карте они есть.
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-29 14:47:03+00:00): Так уж получилось, что был там сам пятью днями ранее. На велосипеде. Проехал и внёс информацию (весьма подробную) о тропе (той, что левее), загрузил трек. Вторую не проверял, но там тоже есть чей-то трек (vitebskbiker-а, наверное)
f1mishutka (2016-08-29 14:49:14+00:00): Во как...

Извиняюсь тогда. Будем считать, что я просто не нашёл выходов ни на одну, ни на другую тропу. И несколько местных нам тоже говорили, что там давно нет прохода, всё заросло.

Жаль...
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-29 14:54:50+00:00): Заросло здорово, но мне даже проехать удалось, не спешиваясь ни разу
f1mishutka (2016-08-29 14:58:50+00:00): Тогда и за вот эту тропинку надо сказать вам спасибо :) ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438477401
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-29 15:03:30+00:00): Можно и так сказать)) Предвидел этот вопрос)) Там указано качество horrible и трава (когда-то была даже дорога, сами всё видели, впрочем)
f1mishutka (2016-08-29 15:07:35+00:00): Будем учиться смотреть и качество при планировании треков :)
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-29 15:09:53+00:00): Могу посоветовать, где удобнее смотреть, кстати: в OsmAnd под андроид есть такая опция и карты можно обновлять каждый день
Stalfur (2016-08-30 02:46:15+00:00): Artem - stop changing native language to English
chillly (2016-12-08 15:32:28+00:00): I don't think Welton Memorial Hall is a pub. Better to describe it as a community_centre. I'm going to change it.
mapper999 (2016-08-30 19:36:59+00:00): Hi,
das Verkehrszeichen 250 (der rote Kreis) gilt nur für Fahrzeuge (vehicle=no) und nicht für Fußgänger. Daher ist access=no  eigentlich falsch. Als Fußgänger darf ich hier bis kurz vor die Autobahn laufen.
user_5359 (2016-08-29 18:12:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! And please move your node to the right building.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:28:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
div006 (2019-03-05 03:11:43+00:00): Hi diorz38,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the"way 439674814
way 439674810
way 439674842
way 439674885
way 439674883
" classified as 'Residential' as well as connecting missing and hanging. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:01:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:01:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
zstadler (2016-09-04 19:13:35+00:00): !!!תודה
mavl (2019-01-13 17:01:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:01:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:01:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-05-04 10:58:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58675712 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs in Iraq (most already removed).
mavl (2019-01-13 17:02:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
literan (2016-08-29 15:03:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы делаете бессмысленную работу, нанося имена домов в неправильном формате (типа "23с.2"). Так дома никто не найдет. Почитайте, пожалуйста, как правильно: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr Ну и улицы тоже надо добавлять в адрес каждого дома, в соответствующее поле
Беня (2016-08-30 04:44:44+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за подсказку.
Прочитал, как правильно наносить дома.
Исправлю. 
Улицы добавляю, но иногда программа это делать не дает.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:02:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2016-09-08 16:16:52+00:00): Based on Bing image, I don't think this is one-way, as the yellow stripe and the turn channel to 44 Business show two-way travel.
bogdan_andrei (2016-09-09 05:32:49+00:00): Do you refer to Canal Street(way: 159118954) ?
RoadGeek_MD99 (2016-09-09 11:29:06+00:00): Sorry, yes, way/159118954
bogdan_andrei (2016-09-09 12:11:33+00:00): For adding one way i used ImproveOSM with TrafficFlowDirection function, and from 810 trips, 100% of the drivers go in that direction. The yellow strip is to separate the drivers who come from Lytle Avenue and those who come from Canal Street in south direction. I think this is the right solution. If you are certain that i am wrong i have no problem to modify. Thanks :)
RoadGeek_MD99 (2016-09-09 12:37:21+00:00): Thanks for the reply.  I believe way/206465488 would have no purpose if way/159118954 was one-way (one-way now removed).  I have seen a small number of the 100% ImproveOSM trips where the opposite direction had a very clear yellow line and a stop line at the intersection for 2 way travel.  The yellow line is to the left of the driver, white would be used if both lanes flowed south  :-)
dromedar61 (2017-06-30 22:41:20+00:00): Bitte mach das rückgängig!
Jägersteig ins unwegsame Gelände soll nicht als durchgehender weg ersichtlich sein um unerfahrene Wanderer abzuhalten!
Himbeere (2017-07-03 11:07:07+00:00): Ich finde es sehr schade, wenn Jägersteige und andere nur schlecht markierte Wege in OSM keinen Platz mehr haben. Das war bislang für mich einer der wichtigsten Gründe  OSM zu verwenden, weil ich hier Wege fand, die ich selbst auf einer ÖK 25.000 nicht fand.
Gibt es nicht eine Möglichkeit, solche Wege entsprechend zu kennzeichnen, damit klar ist, dass es sich hier um keinen klassischen Wanderweg handelt?
PS: habe erst vor 3 Wochen begonnen OSM-Karten zu editieren, kenne daher die ganze Vorgeschichte nicht.
gebux (2017-07-03 18:17:52+00:00): Natürlich haben diese Wege Platz in der OSM. Eine Abgrenzung von offiziellen Wanderwegen kann man mittels Hiking-Relation herstellen, ansonsten gibts die Tags sac_scale für die Schwierigkeit und trail_visibility für die Sichtbarkeit. Ob ich solche Steige direkt an einen Wanderweg hänge mache ich von ausschließlich den Verhältnissen vor Ort abhängig - geht der Steig/die Steinmanderl direkt vom Weg weg bilde ich das auch so in der OSM ab, wird er erst irgendwo später im Gelände sichtbar ebenso.
Himbeere (2017-07-03 18:52:44+00:00): dromedar61 hat vorgeschlagen, solche Wege nicht durchgehend einzutragen. Das würde bedeuten, dass ich einen Weg in x Teile zerlege. Richtig? Gibt es dafür ein Beispiel, wo ich mir das anschauen kann?
dromedar61 (2017-07-03 18:53:29+00:00): Hallo gebux!
Ich bin ganz bei dir, Jägersteige gehören in die OSM.
Ich möchte nur nicht, dass z.b. unerfahrene Wanderer mit ggf. schlechtem Orientierungsvermögen durch Routing auf solchen Steigen landen, nur weil das Routing dies als kürzesten weg angibt. 
Und in der normalen osm.org sind  sac_scale nicht direkt ersichtlich, erst bei der Datenbank-Abfrage.

lg Dromedar61
gebux (2017-07-03 20:53:30+00:00): @Himbeere
Ein gutes Beispiel für vorbildlich aufgeteilte Steige ist das Wegenetz nördlich von Amaro und Moggio Udinese im Kanaltal in Friaul ITA. Dort gibts haufenweise alte Steige die genau nach Sichtbarkeit und Schwierigkeit aufgeteilt sind. Die OSM ist in diesem Gebiet nun die beste Wahl für Wanderer und Mountainbiker.

Das mit dem Routing ist sicher ein Problem, aber hier muss man abwiegen was einem Wichtiger ist: eine korrekte Karte oder ein DAW in den Latschen (der dafür aber genau weiß wie weit er vom richtigen Weg weg ist). Da sehe ich den Ball eher bei den Routing-Anbietern liegen die bei Wanderrouting Sachen wie sac_scale, visibility und Wander-Relationen beachten müssen. 
Ich hoffe aber das die meisten Wanderer bereits Offlinekarten wie openandromaps.org verwenden wo sowohl sac_scale als auch trail_visibility ausgewertet werden. 
Als Kompromiss  könnte man aber den unmarkierten Steig ein paar Pixel neben den Wanderweg enden lassen, dann schauts auf der Karte richtig aus während Router die Abzweigung ignorieren.
Himbeere (2017-07-04 08:22:18+00:00): Besten Dank für all die hilfreichen Kommentare und wie ihr versucht einem Neueinsteiger weiterzuhelfen!
lg
Himbeere
Alecs01 (2016-08-29 19:36:58+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, come si chiama l'hotel? sei sicuro della posizione? hai indicato come indirizzo Via Orefici, che lì vicino non c'è, la più vicina che vedo è circa un chilometro più a sud, a Capriate San Gervasio: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258895560
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 18:50:46+00:00): Non risulta nulla del genere nemmeno nell'elenco della Regione che è piuttosto aggiornato: https://www.dati.lombardia.it/Turismo/Strutture-Ricettive-Alberghiere-e-extra-alberghier/745d-3uyg l'ho cancellato
Владимир К (2016-08-31 06:45:34+00:00): А зачем две администрации?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:27:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-08-30 06:23:44+00:00): Hi!

Ich schon wieder :-)

Ich würde Dir wirklich nahe legen, Wheelmap nicht zu verwenden, um OSM Daten zu verändern. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373024634 hast Du damit leider Dinge verändert, die so wie sie waren, richtig waren. Es handelt sich um einen Raum innerhalb eines Gebäudes (dies wird beim sogenannten Indoor-Mapping verwendet). Bitte gucke Dir, bevor Du Dinge veränderst, die über das Wheelchair Mapping hinausgehen genau an, an welchem Objekt Du arbeitest. Das Tag name=* war in diesem Fall die Bezeichung des Raumes innerhalb des Gebäudes. Das gesamte Gebäude ist hingegen mit Cartesium getaggt und auch noch als Relation vorhanden. Deshalb: nutze bitte einen richtigen Editor für alles, was über Wheelchair hinausgeht.

Dann noch zum Parkplatz: Schau Dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking an. Dort findest Du das richtige Tagging für Parkplätze. Eine Adresse ist zum Beispiel nicht notwendig, name=* wird nur für Eigennamen verwendet. Daß es sich um einen Parkplatz handelt, ergibt sich aus amenity=parking. Auch ist die Frage, welche Form der Parkplatz hat. Wenn es Stellplätze am Straßenrand sind, sollten sie entsprechend getaggt werden.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit, nur so kann man dazulernen.

Oliver
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:27:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Felipe Alves (2016-08-29 16:18:57+00:00): Esse restaurante "Mangue Seco", que vc criou, está dentro do mar. Saberia a localização correta dele, pra corrigir?
Abs
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:27:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-08-29 18:04:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The boundary of your property isn’t build by a driveway. I have cleanup the situation, add two buildings and many footways.
Nakaner (2016-08-29 20:34:33+00:00): Please use a dedicated account for importing data. Otherwise anyone might revert your edits without any other reason because of violation of the Import Guidline. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account