piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2022-10-16 18:22:26+00:00): It appears to me that you're basing the road hierarchy off of functional classification, which is typically opposed when it comes to classifying roads in the US. It's what made states like Arizona, Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, etc. have a messy and discontinuous road network on the map in the past. Having a bunch of discontinuous roads of such high classification running close together is also confusing to people who use OSM data for navigation. Something else I learned when classifying roads is that it can interfere with the OSM-based nav systems, leading people to take more major routes which may be longer than taking a lesser route that may be shorter.

Regardless of that, copying off functional classification defeats the purpose of OSM, which should mostly be based on community consensus or personal beliefs with strong rationales. If the map is going to be the same as DOT FC maps, we could just use those instead.

Re-addressing trunk classification, having Veterans Parkway be trunk makes sense to me as an alternative route around Reno towards Lake Tahoe or Carson City that long-distance traffic may take, but having McCarran doesn't since a big portion of it is arterial road, which is for the vast majority of cases slower than staying on the freeway. Pyramid Way doesn't make sense to me either because, while it is the main road through the area, it is still a road to nowhere beyond the Reno city limits that is only useful for local traffic or the minority of people driving up to Pyramid Lake. It also does not connect at both ends to any other major highways that would be needed for driving between two major cities. The primary classification's main purpose is for roads like these; major roads that do not meet standard trunk criteria. Having it tagged as trunk would indicate that it is as important as I-80, US 395, NV 439, and any other road used to get between major cities or things like airports and seaports.

As for my reasoning in the classification in NRA roads, I believe that the most significant roads through the parks that can alternatively be used for getting between populated places make sense as primary. Most of the roads through Lake Mead NRA can be used as a non-freeway route between Mesquite/Moapa and Henderson/Boulder City, while Kyle Canyon Road is the main road between Las Vegas and Spring Mountains NRA, not just the small community. If the SMNRA did not exist and Mount Charleston wasn't a resort town, then it make sense for this road to be secondary, perhaps even tertiary.

I'm not sure why US 95 ALT through the Yerington area would be controversial though, since it is the fastest route between Las Vegas and Reno/Carson.

If you aren't entirely sure about the new road class scheme in Reno, I highly suggest you revert Pyramid back to primary and the new primaries back to secondary just for the time being so that a thorough discussion with other users regarding them can be had. I'd like to note, however, that I am on board with upgrading collectors/minor arterials to tertiary/secondary, as that is what I have been doing for the area I currently live in and in Las Vegas.
Joseph R P (2022-10-17 03:03:29+00:00): I think the situation for Pyramid > Sparks > Los Altos > Spanish Springs is that each one might be classified a step higher than it has to be. The things is the collector/arterial hierarchy covers more classifications of roads than OSM's road hierarchy can.

If you're fine with me doing so, I'll start a discussion on the highway classification channel of the OSM US Slack server regarding road classification like this to see what other people think. This isn't entirely a matter of whether you're from the area or not, but rather whether the changes adhere to the country's OSM road hierarchy guidelines.

By the way, I didn't mean to come off as telling you to revert your changes, no one has any power over anyone in disagreements, but I rather meant that generally people who work on road classification aren't usually fond of basing classification around the road's construction or traffic counts and creating stubs like these. But do let me know if this is something I could start a Slack discussion about. I think from there, data can be collected and written out into a highway classification proposal, like with what's been done for other states. I've heard that TheConductor has started working on one but I haven't heard about it in a while, I may have to contact him about that.
Helium314 (2024-01-06 08:48:15+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier access=no eingetragen, laut Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3718779 stimmt das aber nicht. Woher hast du die Information über die Beschränkung?
pfg21 (2022-11-11 13:45:54+00:00): получился разрыв trunk.
весь транзит теперь идет в обход майкопа ??
crazybobbo (2022-11-11 14:02:12+00:00): Предполагается, что по обходу Майкопа пойдет грузовой трафик, однако я лично не проверял, есть ли запрет на движение грузовых автомобилей через город. 
Надеюсь, что понял вас правильно.
gscholz (2022-10-14 06:21:33+00:00): Hi Roberto_Mezzina,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and overlapping waterways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-53.55748&lat=-12.09645&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127483597

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please be more careful with your edits and contact your YouthMappers tutor to learn more.
Kind regards
Guido
ivanbranco (2022-10-13 18:38:37+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio, grazie per le modifiche

così però hai creato una pista ciclabile sovrapposta a delle unclassified già mappate. Inoltre hai inserito smoothness=bad che mi sembra strano, dalle foto aeree sembrano strade asfaltate in buone condizioni.

Se vuoi creare un itinerario ciclistico dovresti creare una relazione, vedi anche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes

"kintana" è un nome utilizzato dai biker? in questo caso dovresti mapparlo come mtb:name=* e non come name=*
emersonveenstra (2022-10-20 14:57:09+00:00): Hi,

Can you double check the opening hours on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103634520 ? it's not valid and I'm not sure what it's supposed to be, so I can't fix it. Thanks!
paco3346 (2022-10-21 14:23:24+00:00): Thanks for the catch.

Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127887545
emersonveenstra (2022-10-21 19:14:52+00:00): Awesome, thanks!
5m4u9 (2022-10-13 23:00:38+00:00): Hola, añadiste un "casino" en un lugar cerca a la presa de la laguna chaqui khocho... es muy probable que sea otro negocio?
hdevine825 (2022-10-14 14:51:17+00:00): Hi, thanks for making your first edit on OSM! I noticed that for the node that you added for Cayuga Correctional Facility there is also an area for the prison: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962417711 

There should be only a node or an area for one real world feature. I did notice that you added a lot of good additional information to the node that could be included on the area. You can merge the features in the ID editor to combine them and keep all of the tags you added.
b-jazz (2022-10-24 03:31:39+00:00): Why do these duplicate (and slightly shift) the existing waterway that has been there for 8+ years? Shouldn't they be deleted??
PT-53 (2022-10-14 06:56:07+00:00): Hallo Tschaeck,
dieser Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210392711/history
hat nur am westlichen Ende 4 Fahrspuren. Auf dem größten Teil sind es nur 2 Fahrspuren.
Deine Auftrennung des ursprünglichen Straßenabschnittes war wohl an der falschen Stelle.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210392711/history
Tschaeck (2022-10-14 07:03:25+00:00): Shi.... Da hab ich doch glatt den zweiten Trennpunkt vergessen. Ich geb dir da völlig Recht. Ich schau mir's nochmal an
Tschaeck (2022-10-14 11:15:05+00:00): Straße nochmals getrennt an der Kreuzung Bismarckring/Alter Postplatz und Fahrspuren wieder auf 2 reduziert
user_5359 (2022-10-16 07:33:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/354674298 (one of four objects). What is the meaning of the tag 
ID_BUDYNKU = 260101_4.0006.160/3.3_BUD. If this is a reference number please use the key ref.
puchaczowsky (2022-10-14 09:10:03+00:00): dzięki za zmapowanie, dobra robota! :)
Dawid2849 (2022-10-14 18:30:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103651048

Ten budynek został wyburzony, widać to na najnowszym orto.
kubahahaha (2022-10-15 01:05:25+00:00): Kasuję, rysowałem po Geoportalu HR, bo podjazdy lepiej widać i tam jeszcze stoi
Frans S (2022-10-14 09:30:55+00:00): Hello. I reviewed this changeset as well.
About tagging highways.  Tag residential is to be used in urban areas. Not on a hamlet like here.
Please do not forget to place a tall building on its footprint.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127489746
abakus_uploader (2022-10-13 22:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
jfd553 (2022-12-14 20:50:44+00:00): Dans tes ajouts commerciaux, tu as fait une superposition de landuse=retail autour de name=Carrefour de l’Estrie, là où il y avait déjà un landuse=retail. Il aurait fallu que tu fasses deux polygones contigus, pas deux superposés. C’est-à-dire découper le premier polygone là où tu voulais mettre le tien, puis créer un polygone contigu bien à toi pour identifier le Carrefour de l’Estrie.

Je te laisse faire la correction. Bonne carto!
Dodko (2022-11-29 00:25:57+00:00): ref:minvskaddress sa nekopíruje z inej adresy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10099289318/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10099289319/history
aceman444 (2024-05-29 19:22:29+00:00): Jasne, pardon.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-13 22:31:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Patchanka (2022-10-14 10:16:45+00:00): bonjour
c'est quoi cette œuvre ??
Si c'étaient les M&Ms ils ont disparu depuis longtemps :-(

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=938094677583907
Patchanka (2022-10-29 13:32:56+00:00): bonjour
j'y passe tous les jours et pour moi il n'y a plus d’œuvre à cet endroit. Auparavant il y a eu les m&m's sur l'armoire électrique mais ils ont disparus il y a quelques années (armoire repeinte ou remplacée ?).
Donlooba411 (2022-11-07 09:44:48+00:00): Hello, oui effectivement c'était bien cette œuvre... Je ne sais pas encore quelle est la bonne marche à suivre sachant que j'aimerais garder une archive. Je vais traiter le sujet avec Teritorio. Merci ! A
raphaelmirc (2022-10-14 11:13:50+00:00): Bom dia mlandaar!
tudo bem?

Corrigi o mapeamento de Áreas verde que voce fez com o uso da ferramenta da HOT, as areas verdes estava todas soltas, você pode grudar as areas, pois quando as areas ficam sem se grudar forma um buraco no mapa, corrigi as areas grudando as mesmas, da uma olhada aqui; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127518772 sempre grudar as areas verdes, voce pode passar um pouco da area do quadrado que a HOT coloca para mapear e pode grudar as areas sem problema nennhum.. 

abraço,

Raphaelmirc
user_5359 (2022-10-15 05:48:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1103666283 (one of two objects). What is the meaning of the tags
FEAT_CODE = UTTR50
FEAT_DESC = TRANSMISSION LINE (electrical) line
SHAPE_FID = 248
SHAPE_LEN = 5566.65774008471
ZVALUE = 9999.0
?
Patchanka (2022-10-24 15:09:06+00:00): bonjour Alban
pour cette œuvre j'ai un gros doute... Pourquoi est-elle au milieu de la route ? Est-ce vraiment une fresque murale (artwork=mural) il me semblait qu'Isaac Cordal faisait plutôt des petites sculptures (artwork=sculpture).
Cette œuvre existe-elle toujours ?
merci d'avance
Donlooba411 (2022-10-24 22:13:34+00:00): Hello Laura
Pour cet artiste j'ai un problème de conscience pas vraiment compatible avec les standards osm... J'ai indiqué une position approximative parce que les œuvres d'Isaac sont volées. 
Soit je supprime le POI soit je prends le risque de préciser le POI.... ce jour là je n'ai pas tranché ! :-S
Patchanka (2022-10-29 13:39:17+00:00): bonjour
je comprends le dilemme... Cependant à mon avis tu peux soit la mettre dans OSM soit la pas la mettre... Cet entre-deux me parait bizarre.
Déjà l’œuvre est-elle toujours présente en 2022 ? Je ne sais pas si les voleurs ont un meilleur sens de l'observation que moi, mais j'y suis passée ce matin mais je ne l'ai pas trouvée. 
Du coup je veux bien un peu plus de précisions sur sa localisation ^^
Donlooba411 (2022-11-07 09:46:58+00:00): Elle y est bien ^^ 
Les proprio ont rénové la façade mais ils ont tout fait pour conserver la sculpture d'Isaac. Je vais prendre le risque de la positionner correctement 🤞
Patchanka (2022-11-07 16:20:11+00:00): j'ai modifié le type en artwork=sculpture car ce n'est pas une fresque (mural). 
Ca me rend dingue j'ai passé 10 min devant l'immeuble l'autre jour et je ne l'ai pas trouvée !!!! Il faut que j'y retourne maintenant
eggie (2022-10-14 05:47:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alle begin is moeilijk..
Lijmen gaat helaas wat te makkelijk met editor iD  Het is gebied van je edits is zo groot omdat je het hek vast hebt gelijmd aan de landuse=residential van de woonwijk. Ik maak even wat los. Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-14 05:53:30+00:00): Kasper  .. Het hek heb ik losgemaakt van de polygonen. Kijk nog eens hoe dat hek echt hoort te lopen. Je kunt het nu aanpassen want het ligt los. 

Svp niet een gebouw van vorm veranderen mbv luchtfoto's. Die zijn schuin genomen. Ik zal het gebouw herstellen. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127493066

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-14 05:58:09+00:00): Het grasveld kwam zich weer tegen. Ik heb dat stukje er tussenuit gehaald.

Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
PfadiRBZ (2022-10-15 00:52:28+00:00): This is a Restaurant
Website: https://jurablick.com/
English Version: https://jurablick.com/english
Yaaaaaaaa (2022-10-15 02:05:00+00:00): Ok thanks. Feel free to modify its tags.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-14 22:31:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Vinber-Pro (2022-10-14 06:54:17+00:00): salut,
n'est pas sur le mur de l'atelier ?
cela semble être en dehors ?
à vérifier pour les reprendre, mais je suppose que les mural sont bien sur les murs et non à coté ?
à bientôt
Donlooba411 (2022-10-16 22:41:27+00:00): Hello ! c'est exact mais quand je stich le point avec le mur, j'ai l'impression de transformer mon point en mur... Du coup je le rapproche au max sans pour autant le superposer.
C'est exactement OTG !
MxxCon (2022-10-14 17:01:27+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete that driveway and parking isle ways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127494462
chris2map (2026-07-19 13:10:50+00:00): Hi! You added "name:carnaval" to the river Вилюй https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/166236. This was mistakenly, wasn't it? Regards, Chris
nevw (2022-10-14 03:38:10+00:00): Hi
is Metro Award & Ceremonial Capability a company or something else?
Also you listed the street as 1 Rider Blv and addr:steetnumber=5.
Should it be unit or shop 5 at 1 Rider Blv?
nevw (2022-10-23 02:30:58+00:00): no response, deleted Metro Award & Ceremonial Capability.
MxxCon (2022-10-14 17:04:05+00:00): Hello.
Are these buildings already finished or still under construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127495724
eggie (2022-10-14 06:05:44+00:00): Hi Ptit... Please use the addressnode to tag on.. not the buildingshape.
Greetz
Eggie
eggie (2022-10-14 06:28:46+00:00): meged info with addressnode
黑鲸鱼 (2024-08-10 03:07:46+00:00): 开车小心。数据已删。
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-14 08:20:16+00:00): Nazwa "dom" do skasowania
DaveF (2022-10-15 10:37:47+00:00): Hi
There is already a railway station. Please don't duplicate.
Hufkratzer (2022-10-16 11:35:55+00:00): Hi, you have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825331404 and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding . In the aerial view it looks like a building. A building should have a building tag. Also the horse_riding tag should not be used for a specific building but for the whole farm, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding .
A similar case where you have removed a building tag is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870933779
Aniz Bajracharya (2022-10-17 09:34:49+00:00): Made changes and Acknowledge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .
Herman Lee (2022-10-14 03:54:53+00:00): 本修改集已经部分退回
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 10:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127516699, 127518312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6445 and previous blocks, and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3106357 .