piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2016-03-24 15:24:16+00:00): Yes I trace from aerial imagery, but the road widths are conventional according to scale (so they'll tend to be wider than reality at smaller scales and too narrow at larger scales. Mapping all the details of pavements, road widths etc is still a step too far. Although in principle the widths of urban streets are easily added to the data and a more accurate rendering should be possible.

I'll add the details you mention & hope to have a look around just before our next Nottingham pub meeting as its not too far from the Lincolnshire Poacher (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup).
Polyglot (2016-03-25 13:51:10+00:00): Hi Diego,

Are you operating/running these schools? And why did you map them twice? They were already present.

Jo
Diego Lara Rivera (2016-03-25 18:31:23+00:00): Regards
I digitalized the school because there was not yet drawing.
Maybe someone else also digitalized later.
Polyglot (2016-03-25 18:52:05+00:00): OK, but more importantly, why did you add your own name as the operator? Operator means the person, company or group that runs that school.
aharvey (2017-10-08 10:49:12+00:00): hi! Thanks for adding this.

The name key should only be used for a name, not a description or classification of what the feature is, so I've removed "Billabong". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

In OSM water=pond is more for mostly man made ponds in city parks, with ducks etc.water=stream_pool is a better tag for these natural pools formed along a creek or river, I think, so I've changed it over.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-21 12:20:01+00:00): Hi,
You've got Europa Link with a "ref" of C760.  Is that actually signed?  It didn't used to be (a couple of years ago).  If not, official_ref would be the preferred way of tagging it - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/official_ref#values .
Best Regards,
Andy
trigpoint (2016-03-23 13:07:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your additions but I think a few things may have gone wrong.

It is unlikely that number 7 Catterick Way is in the middle of the road. House nodes should be in their correct position. It would also be helpful to add the other numbers within the road.
You have also deleted a footpath which leads from the city to the historic Hamilton village, I find it very hard to believe that such a path could have been extingushed without a large amount of press coverage.
Usually we ask developers to incorporate existing PROW into the plan in green space, maybe sections will be along a road and generally developers oblige. Are you really sure it has gone? Is there maybe a gap in the housing on that alignment. I would suggest that we restore the path for the time being and them maybe update it where it is now surfaced or part of a road.
If you need any help with this, just ask.

Cheers Phil
H Th (2016-03-23 15:12:02+00:00): I have just updated it, and restored the path as its now a road.
moved house number from the middle to the side.

Please see this image to confirm the new area
http://i.imgur.com/44CksyW.jpg
trigpoint (2016-03-23 18:24:59+00:00): Thank you
H Th (2016-03-23 21:02:02+00:00): Here is google map link
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Heritage+Way,+Leicester+LE5+1QF/@52.6573318,-1.0575897,392m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x4877624a50712f91:0xa05997159b529d6b
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 21:39:20+00:00): Hi (just for info) you can't use Google Maps or Google Earth in order to add data to OSM - their terms of service don't permit it.
Presumably that's not what you're doing here though (I guess you're just using it to illustrate something that you've already mapped by other means).
Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Andy
H Th (2016-03-23 21:43:08+00:00): Sorry I am new to OSM and did not know about that but will keep that in mind for future updates.

Thank you.
Prince Kassad (2016-12-14 22:42:54+00:00): Hallo BeKri,

der Hinweis kommt spät aber: du hattest mit diesem Changeset eine Stromleitung (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405041208) eingezeichnet, obwohl dort bereits eine Linie existierte mit dem ausdrücklichen Hinweis "Stromlinie wurde abgebaut! Luftbilder veraltet!"

Diese Stromleitung befand sich größtenteils in Österreich und dort sieht man auf den hochaktuellen basemap.at-Luftbildern auch, dass die Stromleitung definitiv weg ist. Wieso du die Stromleitung trotzdem und vor allem trotz des eindeutigen Hinweises wieder neu eingezeichnet hast, ist mir nicht klar.

Mir ist das nur aufgefallen weil das jemand als Note gemeldet hat. Beim nächsten Mal bitte einfach etwas mehr aufpassen.
BeKri (2016-12-15 01:01:39+00:00): Servus Prince Kassad,
Jo, da habe ich wohl wirklich geschlafen,
keine Ahnung wie ich das übersehen konnte.
Danke für's löschen, Hinweis an michhhätte auch gereicht, dann hätte ich das erledigt (Lerneffekt und so ;-)
Gruss derBeKri
gileri (2016-03-24 23:26:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur l'allé Achille Lignon, il n'est pas autorisé de rouler à vélo : aucun panneau ne l'autorise, et c'est indiqué bus seulement.

La voie verte (piétons/vélos) à côté faite pour ça.
Martin Borsje (2016-03-22 06:34:37+00:00): Hi Flovorium,

Welkom op OSM, maar je eerste edit heb ik als zinloos beschouwd en verwijderd.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-03-22 08:57:55+00:00): Pozwoliłem sobie dodać junction do ronda: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405045266#map=19/49.69595/21.29421 :-)
dziabaducha (2016-03-29 06:17:39+00:00): Dzięki Zbigniew, starość nie radość, zapomniałem.... :-)
geodreieck4711 (2016-11-18 07:54:08+00:00): Schön dass die Brücke wieder nach dem alten Bingfoto da ist, und die History während des Neubaus weg ist.....
Immer diese blinde Abzeichnerei..
PlaneMad (2016-03-22 06:35:32+00:00): Hi FreedSky, amazing work with all the boundaries. Please add a comment to your changesets to give context to other editors of the map.
FreedSky (2016-04-06 14:47:51+00:00): thks 
但是我没这个习惯 i dont like write reason~
hocu (2024-07-03 15:13:46+00:00): Hi LiamNaMara.

What's the purpose of those untagged nodes along the coastline? Is it for a third party tool, or an automated edit? Is there reason that they are kept on the map. Is it safe to delete them?

Thank you.
Hocu
LiamNaMara (2024-07-08 08:11:43+00:00): Hi Hocu, I don't know if this an artefact from uploading a shapefile from JOSM but I don't remember those points appearing previously. It looks like they can be deleted safely if you can do it in bulk.
hocu (2024-07-08 10:57:39+00:00): Hi LiamNaMara,

Thank you for checking this. I'll bulk delete them sometime today, happy mapping!
user_5359 (2016-03-22 10:14:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Great I did't know that Log Angeles should be renamed to "Convey Clearly Los Angeles". I have revert your changeset. Please try again to add a node to the right address.
user_5359 (2016-03-22 10:19:26+00:00): If you need help: You are welcome.
H4N5-antw (2021-09-24 18:32:21+00:00): Waarde, mocht navragen hoe u vaststelde dat hier een recht van overpad bestaat? Trof aan einde Pileceyn al wat gedateerd bordje Privé, aan andere eind ditto. Geen pad of weg op de Atlas der Buurtwegen, noch spoor op Strava, en 'in het veld' geen gebruikssporen. 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Fietsersbond Meetfiets (2021-09-27 16:15:21+00:00): Sorry,
Te lang geleden. Weet ik niet meer.
Renrew1968
ivanbranco (2022-01-08 11:40:53+00:00): Hi BCNowrich,

I think you added the name as place value here by mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4072951906

Could you check it out?
BCNorwich (2022-01-08 12:43:05+00:00): Hi, Crikey that was six years ago! I think the reason at that time was I could not decide what was best to do, but I wanted to mark the area. History, the original hall, a massive building was demolished/divided up years ago. The complex is still the hub of the Dillington Hall farm estate. Your prompt has led me to find one of the buildings is now called Dillington Hall. I've amended it to suit.

Regards Bernard.
josmougn (2016-10-30 21:56:42+00:00): salut
je n'aurais pas mis cycleway=track sur les bandes cyclables le long du TCSP, mais lane ne conviendrait pas non plus ...
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/a4EMAdUN1bvpjki3yAg8RA
Sander H (2016-03-22 19:25:07+00:00): After report on the Dutch forum I restored the hotel and merged Vuurtorenplein 138 to the existing node in the apartment building a few hundred meters northeast.
literan (2016-03-22 12:38:36+00:00): задвоил точку!!! вот хожу полдня и вычищаю эти задвоения только :(( Прошу удалить самостоятельно.
Felis Pimeja (2016-03-22 12:57:31+00:00): Хммм... Похоже на глюк maps.me,
Поправил.
literan (2016-03-22 13:43:08+00:00): да, я им отписал, они отвечают, что выловлен крутой баг :))
user_5359 (2016-03-22 10:36:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database and not a test or playground database. I have revert your changeset, because he hasn't a readable comment. Your next editing should be a useful change.
Константин Гам (2019-07-15 11:07:04+00:00): name is name only!
Commodoortje (2016-03-22 11:33:24+00:00): Heb je per ongeluk het gehele gebouw verwijdert?
Zo ja, reageer dan even, dan wil ik je behulpzaam zijn.
Commodoortje (2016-03-30 02:53:34+00:00): Panden hersteld.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38156793
SomeoneElse (2016-03-22 11:27:09+00:00): Thanks - was just about to delete!
Kioska Journo (2016-03-23 21:43:45+00:00): test de notification
maraf24 (2016-03-26 08:29:58+00:00): A skąd taka zmiana? To nie jest Cyców ani nie ma tu ulicy o nazwie Garbatówka.
Polecam oficjalny gminny portal: cycow.e-mapa.net
Peda (2016-04-24 10:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
MMN-o (2016-03-22 21:41:36+00:00): Good catch! I just put names on 'em.
Larry0ua (2016-03-22 12:16:04+00:00): привіт! бачу, були зміщені будинки. До зміщення існуючих даних треба підходити акуратно - часто підложки супутникових знімків зміщені відносно даних, і ми стараємось використовувати gps-дані для точного вирівнювання. Трохи більше деталей на вікі-сторінці http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
для збереження зміщень можу порекомендувати плагін imagery_offset_db для josm

Також для високих будинків може бути неясно, як їх обмальовувати - треба обмальовувати фундамент, при цьому можна наприклад обмалювати дах, якщо він одного рівня, і зсунути до фундаменту, бо знімки можуть бути зняті під кутом.

Якщо будуть питання - пиши сюди, приватним повідомленням або на форум в українську гілку - forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
SOSM (2016-03-23 14:23:02+00:00): Hoi Team Ping
Falls da jetzt eine Baustelle ist, würde ich vorschlagen die auch einzutragen, sonst gibt es die Gefahr, dass jemand das alte Gebäude wieder einträgt.
Team Ping (2016-03-25 18:30:51+00:00): Salü SOSM, danke für dein Vorschlag, es ist so, dass der ganzer Dorf Kern im alten Teil von Gattikon abgebrochen wird. Werde in den nächsten Tagen dort vorbei gehen um details zu bekommen. ps: ist meine erste tat in der OSM welt, deshalb weiss ich noch nicht wie es als Baustelle einzutragen. kriege aber schon noch raus, smile
SOSM (2016-03-26 13:39:34+00:00): Baustelle: Fläche/Polygon mit landuse=construction
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Thomas8122 (2016-03-22 15:22:47+00:00): Den kannste wieder rausnehmen. Die Blitzer sind da https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3035384137 und da https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028390850
Thomas8122 (2016-03-22 15:24:03+00:00): Entschuldigung für das du. Manche haben sich schon auf den Schlips getreten gefühlt.
sergeybe (2016-03-22 14:46:42+00:00): Не занимайтесь вандализмом. Эта правка откачена.
sergeybe (2016-03-22 14:46:53+00:00): Не занимайтесь вандализмом. Эта правка откачена.
VDLab (2017-12-08 13:03:35+00:00): Ок. Поиграетесь, потом не забудьте убрать за собой.
sergeybe (2017-12-10 14:08:11+00:00): Скорость реакции просто поражает!
VDLab (2017-12-10 17:31:40+00:00): А по делу есть что сказать?
Впрочем, не надо. Итак понятно, что убираться никто не будет.
sergeybe (2017-12-10 17:47:55+00:00): Перечислите то что нужно убрать.
alphensebezorger (2018-01-04 06:08:57+00:00): Hallo JJJWegdam,
Ik zag dat er in OSM vangrails op het dak van de TU bieb staan. Zo te zien heb jij die in deze bewerking toegevoegd. Dat moet een vergissing zijn. Vangrails langs de A13 kun je rustig toevoegen, maar dat er op de Huygensweg een auto zo uit de bocht vliegt dat hij boven op de bieb beland is onwaarschijnlijk. Voor de staalconstructie daar zal je een andere tagging moeten vinden.
Succes met mappen en een goed 2018, Alphensebezorger.
MarkusHD (2016-03-22 20:12:23+00:00): Du hast hier einige Parkplatzwege direkt auf Einzelparkplätze gezeichnet, das ist aber nicht richtig so.
chillly (2016-03-23 17:57:59+00:00): forgot to chg the comment :-
szydzio (2017-08-22 13:50:07+00:00): Hej!Wysokość tunelu uzupełniłem.Pozdr!
woodpeck (2016-03-22 19:42:34+00:00): Auf dem Bing-Luftbild ist ein großer Teil des hier von Dir gelöschten Weges deutlich zu erkennen. Ist hier inzwischen (seitdem das Bild entstanden ist) eine bauliche Veränderung eingetreten? -- Falls der Weg existiert, aber nicht nutzbar ist, dann solltest Du dafür ein access=private o.ä. benutzen, statt den Weg zu löschen.
literan (2016-03-23 12:34:02+00:00): Прям во дворе?
ullus (2016-03-30 10:20:14+00:00): Там небольшое одноэтажное здание во дворе, в нем они и сидят.
KryfoAgapi (2016-04-05 11:17:50+00:00): Можно расшифровку комментария/описания?
FTA (2016-08-26 22:18:22+00:00): Hi, it looks like you potentially duplicated this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363662756 with this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4073409989
GoWestTravel (2016-08-26 22:21:34+00:00): You're absolutely right. I removed the hotel right away. We don't want duplicates ;) Thanks!
FTA (2016-08-26 22:22:45+00:00): Hey, no problem! Just stumbled upon this today...I'm glad someone else is helping map my home town!
Best,
Ethan aka FTA
GoWestTravel (2016-08-26 22:24:09+00:00): Hi Ethan, helping where I can! Happy mapping!
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-03-22 23:49:31+00:00): Poproszę źródło adresów w tej miejscowości.
Martin Borsje (2016-03-22 17:39:07+00:00): Beste Stanley,

Welkom op OSM!

Wat bedoel je precies met deze edit?
En wat betekent je commentaar hjmmf?

Gaarne reactie
Commodoortje (2016-03-23 10:18:45+00:00): Hoi StanleyH123,

Heb je per ongeluk het stuk weg Henri Wijnmalenweg naar de Luchthavenweg verwijderd?
aharvey (2019-08-02 00:31:13+00:00): I noticed you've used source=landgate, could you please confirm where you sourced this data from?
rund (2019-08-02 08:25:12+00:00): Hi aharvey, not data but street names. Names that are approved by the GNC will appear on Landgate’s online mapping. No data was obtained.
aharvey (2019-08-02 08:33:32+00:00): It doesn't matter, if it's names only, coping data from a source that explicitly says personal, non-commercial use is not allowed in OSM. So you can't source any information from Landgate. Another user has since replace this data with Main Roads open data, which is licensed CC BY and for which we have the legal waiver for. So in the future, keep that in mind.
rund (2019-08-03 04:09:43+00:00): Well that just brings into question the veracity of all geographic names in Western Australia. If we can’t go to the official source of government-approved names then how can we have any confidence that OSM street names are right?

I wouldn’t trust MRWA data - MRWA is horrendously terrible at using GNC approved street names.
aharvey (2019-08-03 04:23:14+00:00): They are correct if they match what the street sign on the ground says. It's good practice to map what's on the ground, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. Sure that's not an absolute rule, but a good guide.

End of the day, the government of Western Australia claims copyright to this data, and chooses not to release it under an open license. It's OSM's policy not to allow sourcing copyrighted data https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright.

It puts the dataset which we highly regard as free and open, at jeopardy when tainted with copyrighted data. So please don't do that.

By
rund (2019-08-03 04:44:03+00:00): So has OSM made an approach to Landgate for access to use street names without charge under section 16(9) of the Land Information Authority Act 2006? It would seem that OSM meets the criteria under s.16(4) for not being of commercial benefit, and if OSM contributors simply transcribe names from MapViewer then Landgate would not incur any data collection costs.
rund (2019-08-03 04:45:27+00:00): It would be more efficient then travelling to each of these new estates to find the street signs...
aharvey (2019-08-03 04:58:12+00:00): Not that I'm aware of, you're welcome to. Not required, but we do try to track open data which legally can be used at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Catalogue.

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility may help.

Keep in mind that we cannot use non-commercial data, since downstream users of OSM are permitted to sell OSM data. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility
PT-53 (2016-03-22 19:08:41+00:00): Eintrag gelöscht, da entspr- Node bereits vorhanden ist-
Graf Westerholt (2017-04-06 13:47:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1204447156 Was verstehst du unter access=permissive?
dachefte (2017-04-06 18:24:10+00:00): Bitte den Ersteller des Tags fragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1204447156/history
user_5359 (2016-03-22 18:29:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the cafe to the point of the city Stelleville and than move this to correct place of the cafe. If have revert your change sets and add the cafe again. Please check the data https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/37.96822/-91.35471&layers=D
DD1GJ (2016-03-22 17:07:17+00:00): Zurückgesetzt wg. Vandalismus.
EneaSuper (2016-03-23 09:07:58+00:00): I giardini Emanuele Luzzati si chiamano realmente così. è tutto corretto :o
sabas88 (2016-03-23 09:10:36+00:00): Ho messo l'old_name infatti :-) (è un vecchio toponimo dell'area)
EneaSuper (2016-03-23 09:18:53+00:00): Perfetto :)
47NOE (2016-03-22 21:43:48+00:00): L'Espace commercial Caréo regroupe l'ensemble de l'emprise et est dans la base depuis le 10/05/2015. Le noeud ajouté correspond au supermarché SuperU qui occupe l'ensemble de ce bâtiment. Il serait logique de compléter les infos sur l'emprise globale.
BeKri (2016-03-23 15:43:37+00:00): Einspruch Euer Ehren !
Eataly hat die Adresse Viktualienmekt 15, ebenso wie die Cafe und Restaurant und auch der Hacker Pschorr nebenan,
Passt auch nicht von der Strassenseite,
die ungeraden Hausnummern in der Blumenstrasse sind gegenüber.
Witzigerweise hat die Schrannenhalle die Adresse ... Jepp Blumenstraße 4
Gruss derBeKri
whellmut (2016-03-23 21:56:34+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich war dort und habe die Adresse aus dem Kassenzettel abgeschriebnen. Vielleicht war der falsch? In OSM hat die Schrannenhalle die Adresse Blumenstraße 4. Ist das auch falsch?
Gruß whellmut
BeKri (2016-03-24 01:30:16+00:00): Servus whellmut,
das Problem scheint mir, dass viele schlicht nicht wissen, wo sie dazugehören ...
Blumenstraße 15 geht schon nicht,
weil es weiter südlich AUCH eine Blumenstraße 15 gibt  (Kräuterparadie Lindig), Die Blumenstrasse 4 stammt von mir, ich weiß aber die Quelle nicht mehr.
Wenn Du nach "Schrannenhalle Blumenstrasse 4" googelst kommt zumindest die frühere MilkaWelt, die mal auf Hausnummer 6 war ... alles etwas verwirrend und toll dass die Läden das selber nicht wissen
Aber was soll es: Pähl, neue Post, 2 Visitenkarten, 1 Aushang ...3 !!! versch. Öffnungszeiten !
Kroaten und Italiener, die san halt ned typico dedesco ;-)
Constable (2016-05-30 15:09:41+00:00): Ciao, vorrei chiederti di fare maggiore attenzione quando modifichi la mappa, perché hai rimosso entrambe le banchine della stazione di Varenna-Esino ed un tratto di strada che arriva alla stazione stessa.

Se hai bisogno di aiuto a mappare chiedi pure qua https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it oppure consulta le apposite guide http://learnosm.org/it/ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale

Nel frattempo cerco di ripristinare le banchine e la strada
Ciao
Martin Borsje (2016-03-22 19:53:25+00:00): Hoi OB13,

ik denk dat je de Kerkstraat iets te ver naar het noorden doorgenoemd hebt.De huisnummers 2-12 liggen volgens de BAG aan de Torenstraat. De Kerkstraat loopt slechts door tot de Kostersgang.

Ik heb e.e.a. gecorrigeerd. Kun je je er in vinden?

Martin
PB13 (2016-03-23 08:44:57+00:00): Hallo, Ik had alleen de naamgeving van de Kostersgang en het Leerlooierspad gecorrigeerd. De foutieve naamgeving van de Torenstraat/Kerkstraat was me niet opgevallen.
Jouw correctie is echter niet helemaal juist. Het korte stukje ten zuiden van de Kostersgang tot aan de Kerkstraat behoort namelijk ook nog tot de Torenstraat.
Aangezien ik me er niet in heb verdiept hoe ik knooppunten kan aanpassen, heb ik dit niet gecorrigeerd.
Dus al jij dit kan doen, dan graag.

Vriendelijke groet.
Martin Borsje (2016-03-23 19:14:12+00:00): H'm, volgens de PDOK viewer [url]http://pdokviewer.pdok.nl/[/url] (NWB Wegen laag) is het stukje weg ten zuiden van de Torenstraat tussen Kostersgang en het W-O stuk van de Kerkstraat toch echt Kerkstraat genoemd.

Als je ter plekke een straatnaambord ziet dat anders aangeeft, laat het dan even weten, anders laat ik het zo.
(P.S. Ik niet uit van de info van Google Streetview)
locke (2016-10-14 09:09:33+00:00): The bridge seems to be reopened. http://www.bane.dk/visNyhed.asp?artikelID=25130
Someone with local knowledge should check this.
Hjart (2016-03-23 06:48:14+00:00): Jeg reverterer lige denne her. Det er ofte en god ide ikke direkte at slette objekter, så folk nemt kan se at det ikke er en fejl at f.eks broen her mangler.
fkornel (2016-03-22 17:05:23+00:00): Szuper
literan (2016-03-23 12:36:16+00:00): Хинкали пойнт уже есть в 20 м к северо-востоку. Задвоили? Удалите?
dbf_ (2016-03-23 18:16:47+00:00): Спасибо за комментарий, пропустил.
skorasaurus (2016-03-24 16:06:55+00:00): 
whoa, you did a lot of cleaning here! 

Looks like you deleted a 1000 roads! were all of them the TIGER-imported that really don't exist?
Nate Wessel (2016-03-24 17:00:18+00:00): I've been cruising around Ohio for a while deleting bad tiger data... as a rule, I don't touch anything if it's been edited by a human.

Honestly, some of these may have been better reclassified as highway=service,service=driveway, or as tracks... but I think it takes about as much time to reclassify them properly as to just draw them again from the imagery. 

This tiger data is such a mess in places :-/
skorasaurus (2016-03-24 18:04:41+00:00): true. It's a little odd as you've noticed how some counties' driveways were imported via TIGER and others in Ohio were not.
friedl (2016-03-23 09:14:26+00:00): Hallo,

Woher stamt die Info, dass die FACC Operations GmbH. bzw. die angegebene Adresse hier sein soll?
Laut meinen Nachforschungen ist die FACC Operations GmbH am FACC Gelände (Fischerstrasse 9 - das Gebäude hier scheint mir dafür auch zu klein). Hier ist laut basemap.at die Griesgasse 14a und ich konnte keinen Hinweis darauf finden, dass es die Griesgasse 23 in Ried überhaupt gibt.

friedl