piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2019-06-24 20:10:53+00:00): Hi kartenzwerg (netter Nick!), willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Deine ersten Beiträge, sehen sehr gut aus! Toll, dass du als Einsteiger gleich den JOSM-Editor verwendest, sehr gute Entscheidung :)

Eine Kleinigkeit zum Rieder-Denkmal möchte ich loswerden: name=* verwenden wir idR nur den Eigennamen und nicht für  Beschreibungen etc. Einzelheiten findest du hier: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben 

Ein (anonymer) Kartennutzer hatte name=Gedenkstein über die Hinweisfunktion angemeckert. Wurde von einem anderen Kollegen (opendcc) und mir heute angepasst, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1823397

Viel Spaß weiterhin bei OSM und danke für deine Beiträge zu unserer Datenbank.

Grüße
Klaus /geow
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 20:04:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 20:08:31+00:00): Dag Jacqueline,

Park edits liggen bij OSM onder een vergrootglas. Vaak  wordt iets ten onrechte als een park getagd om het spel  Pokomon Go te beïnvloeden. Een park is een uitgestrekt terrein bestaande uit verschillende landuse=*, waterpartij(en), etc.  
Leisure=park ligt daar dan als een transparante deken over heen.
De definitie van park in OSM sluit dus meer aan op het Engelse begrip park en daar voldoet de wijziging niet aan.

Deze changeset wordt teruggedraaid.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 20:35:17+00:00): In plaats daarvan heb ik de watergangen ingetekend volgens een recente luchtfoto.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 20:25:36+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

ik zal het wijzigen in leisure=garden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure
opendcc (2019-06-24 05:48:03+00:00): Ah, sehr gut. In Niederbayern bin ich schon öfter mal mit den Rennrad voll in die S ... äh.. den Schlamm reingeraten.

Servus Wolfgang
peppone84 (2019-06-24 17:18:49+00:00): Genau, deswegen :)
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 20:22:58+00:00): Graag concreet omschrijven wat je toegevoegd / gewijzigd hebt.

Hier dus: speeltuintje op de kaart gezet.

Dat is vast niet de formeel vastgestelde naam van de speeltuin. Die kan er dus beter weer af.
Rassilon (2019-06-23 19:57:13+00:00): Oops this is Cuttyhunk Island - Not Martha's Vineyard
mapman44 (2019-06-24 12:47:11+00:00): Hi RHerk and welcome to OSM mapping! Your first edits look great. Keep up the good work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71540325
user_5359 (2019-06-24 15:35:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Leisure=water_park? Please see the difference between https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dwater_park and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool.
cameraman007 (2019-06-25 21:11:13+00:00): User_5359 thank you for your feedback. I got caught up with the idea that it is a wading pool with a few basic water features. I changed the tag to Leisure=swimming_pool and added a description indicating it is a wading pool.
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
borishag (2019-06-24 08:02:43+00:00): If you make any modifications, please leave a comment with what you did.
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Hjart (2019-06-23 22:31:02+00:00): Sheltere mm er fint synlige på SDFE flyfotos, så derfor har jeg tilladt mig at flytte lidt rundt på dem.
ablansinger (2019-06-24 18:42:48+00:00): Fint nok, jeg havde ikke den præcise placering. Men har du en trigger på hver eneste gang jeg laver ændringer ?
Hjart (2019-06-24 18:53:38+00:00): Nej, jeg har ikke en trigger på præcis dig, men jeg følger ofte med på http://osm.expandable.dk/. Jeg bruger en del tid på at fange fejl og guide begyndere. Det er også ofte interessant at se hvad du har gang, så derfor kigger jeg gerne på det.
GinaroZ (2020-01-02 15:25:00+00:00): I assume this razed line wasn't meant to be tagged as a path since it goes through Tesco, so I removed the tag - free free to update https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300398934
DoctorSpeck (2019-06-30 20:09:30+00:00): It appears most of your building moves are moved by the same amount. This is quite possibly due to differences in aerial imagery offset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-23 22:44:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71542743 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a common Pokemon edit.  See note 1821358
Владимир К (2019-06-23 22:01:51+00:00): откатил
BCNorwich (2019-06-24 07:18:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've made a few mistakes most of which someone else has removed. 

The lawn area (Way: 699291261) does no harm but then again on its own adds little to OSM. I don't think natural=grassland is quite right, it's not natural nor grassland, more a verge of surface grass.

Your node (the Avenue trees (6566603855)), this isn't a park, the address is wrong and the name seems fictitious.

Sorry to be so negative but I think it best to remove the above two features as they're not verifiable. If you could explain what you're trying to achieve maybe I can help.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-06-25 06:14:03+00:00): Hi, good to see you've removed those two features. Regards.
maraf24 (2019-06-25 05:49:56+00:00): Ok, ale nowe przystanki muszą być dodane w odpowiednie miejsce pomiędzy innymi przystankami, a nie na końcu listy. To jest wymóg PTv2.
Leo Slager (2019-06-24 10:37:19+00:00): Dag Wilco.
We nemen je niets kwalijk, maar binnen OSM is het de gewoonte om twee zover uit elkaar gelegen mutaties niet samen te voegen in 1 changeset.
Alle mappers in Europa zijn nu op zoek naar jouw wijzigingen in hun land.
wilco83 (2019-06-24 14:42:08+00:00): ahh, nee!!, dat was ook niet de bedoeling. 
Overigens, deze wijzigingen kwamen via maps.me iOS app. Ik was daar aan het experimenteren hoe ik wijzigingen kon indienen en heb daar mijn osm account ook in gekoppeld.
Ik vermoed dat de change van Youth Hostel ergens in de app in de queue stond. 
Want die heb ik ruim een jaar geleden gewijzigd in de app (toen ik daar was)
aquarix (2019-07-01 20:47:31+00:00): Hello wilco,
for me it seems like a bug in the maps.me app because in the last month I have seen several change sets with large rectangles that occurred after one or more changes were committed by Maps.me.
It would be nice if you could ask the developer(s) if they know about this problem and can hopefully fix it.
Regards aquarix
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-23 22:44:34+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 71541985.
pio2_122 (2019-06-26 10:29:22+00:00): Zdajesz sobie sprawę, że dublujesz adresy w POI, które są już na budynkach?
user_5359 (2019-06-24 15:30:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a duplicate, I merge the booth information
bhiihow (2019-07-09 19:28:07+00:00): Thank you for catching that. Still getting used to this, I'll be more careful next time!
michalfabik (2019-06-24 07:12:28+00:00): Pozdrav, hvala što doprinosiš u OpenStreetMap! Molim te koristi pravilan pravopis kod naziva objekata (Nešković, Maletić)
LP
Michal
milos993 (2019-06-28 18:53:37+00:00): Hvala lijepo na odgovoru. Hoću, koristiću :) postoji li način da dam prijedlog ili direktno obrišem objekte koji ne postoje? Tipa ovaj ProMotors, vec više od godinu dana je kazino Admiral tu. Pozdrav!
michalfabik (2019-06-28 21:20:21+00:00): Možeš staviti napomenu (desni klik, "Add a note here"), ali slobodno odmah briši i mijenjaj ako si upoznat sa situacijom na terenu. U BiH ima samo oko 5 aktivnih mapera, tako da šanse da neko primijeti Tvoje napomene nisu velike.
LP
Michal
Wilmer Osario (2019-06-30 20:38:38+00:00): El ramal del "Distribuidor San Bernardino" no puede quedar aislado del resto de las avenidas principales de la zona (Av. Andrés Bello y Libertador)......no se le debe quitar la prioridad de "secundaria" (highway=secondary) a los tramos de las avenidas El Lago, Volmer, La Estrella, Caracas y La Blásina.

Una (highway=tertiary) es una prioridad demasiado baja para esos tramos de avenida.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-06-24 08:46:13+00:00): Du bør ikke bruke typen "park" for de tingene du legger inn her. En park er typisk "Frognerparken" eller "Byparken" i Kongsvinger. Dvs. et annlegg med trær, stier og benker. Nå har jeg ikke vært så mye på Galterud, men jeg tror ikke det er så veldig mye av dette der. Hvis dette er et område for gjenvinning så finnes det egne tagger for dette: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Det ser også litt overdrevet ut med en gammel drenerings-kum lagt inn som "monument" :)
Kweskab (2019-06-24 10:45:08+00:00): Takk for pekepinne. skal lese meg mer opp på hva som er spesifikt for hva fremover :D
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-06-24 10:50:08+00:00): Den er god :) Bare spør hvis det er noe. Norske mailinglista: kart@nuug.no eller på IRC: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC (#osm-no).
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-24 00:24:17+00:00): Please do not add fictional features to the map.
Lucanesti (2019-06-24 15:01:44+00:00): Get a life
FredrikLindseth (2019-06-24 08:45:59+00:00): Hei Kweskab og velkommen til Openstreetmap. Kjekt med nye bidragsytere, men du legger til litt mange parker som ikke er "park" i Openstreetmaps øyner. Det bør helst være offentlig område som blir stelt med trær og benker og så videre. Du bør ta en kikk på landuse=grass i stedet.  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
Kweskab (2019-06-24 10:43:01+00:00): Takk for pekepinne. Skal lese meg mer opp på hva som blir kategorisert som hva fremover :D
FredrikLindseth (2019-06-24 15:29:39+00:00): Det er ikke så farlig. Det er mange meninger om hva som er "rett", men wikien er en fin plass å finne ut av hva som er hva.
Det er en gjeng som henger på chatterommet her https://webchat.oftc.net/?channels=osm hvis det noen gang skulle være noe
andrewsh (2019-06-27 22:57:34+00:00): Maria, you should really check what objects you’re editing. You’ve just renamed the entire city of Guanajuato to "union garden".
Please pay more attention in future.
andrewsh (2019-06-27 23:01:42+00:00): Besides, the Unión garden already existed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27356583
Maria Blonde Andersson (2019-06-28 05:04:26+00:00): Hi. I don't think that was intentional if that alteration suggestion was done by me?! When did this happen, because I don't remember trying to change any of this though. What I do remember is that the place on the map where it says Guanajuato, it also says that the English name for it is union garden and that when you zoom out and you should be able to see just the name of the city (Guanajuato), it said union garden.

Right now this is the info I see when I click on "change place" (or whatever it says in English, since my app is in  Swedish)

Category: city

Name of  place
Español: Guanajuato
English: union garden
Maria Blonde Andersson (2019-06-28 05:05:29+00:00): Also it would be nice of you to drop the condescending tone. Thanks.
andrewsh (2019-06-28 14:56:39+00:00): I’m sorry if the tone came across as condescending, that’s wasn’t my intention. When you edit an object in MAPS.ME, it tells you what the type of the object is, which is a good way to double-check you’re editing the right one, since the user interface in MAPS.ME unfortunately makes it very easy to contribute an incorrect change.

Apparently unintentionally, but you contributed this change about 5 days ago using MAPS.ME. I have already reverted it, so with the next map update you should be able to see it correctly.
Harry Wood (2021-05-20 11:31:49+00:00): I was able to swap the tags from "proposed" for a section of this just now. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105025076
MacLondon (2021-05-21 13:01:35+00:00): Thanks. I've done some further tweaking to the cycle tracks along here now.
mapman44 (2019-06-24 12:42:13+00:00): Hi fishcharlie and welcome to OSM mapping. Your first edits look great! The formatting of the data  was exactly as Wiki directs. Keep up the good work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71544087
Baloo Uriza (2019-06-26 00:45:21+00:00): Is this really named "ClubHouse" or is it simply a clubhouse?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71544121
ThePumpkinMan (2019-06-26 02:47:04+00:00): Sorry, This is a clubhouse, but it is also named ClubHouse
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71544121
MuhammadAli92 (2019-06-25 08:33:16+00:00): Bakerie
MuhammadAli92 (2019-06-25 08:34:02+00:00): Greenworld
viloan (2019-06-24 02:01:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-29 17:35:12+00:00): leisure=playground is the correct tag for a playground.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71544653
user_5359 (2019-06-24 15:23:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402388970 ? You add a dplicate entry.
mavl (2019-07-22 16:04:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-07-11 16:11:04+00:00): سلام چرا این دوربرگردان رو حذف کردین؟ وجود داره هنوز و بازه. از هر دو طرفه بلوار میشه دور زد به طرفه دیگه.
Saeed SJ (2019-07-20 05:14:52+00:00): سلام، درسته قطعا میشه از هر دو طرف دور زد اما با توجه به اینکه این دوربرگردون با فاصله حدودا 100 متر از میدان قرار گرفته به نظر می رسه که فقط در یک جهت ازش استفاده میشه و جهت دیگه غیرضروی بنظر می رسید و دلیل حذف این بود. 
 با این حال نکته ای که عنوان کردید کاملا درست هست و از نظر شما بسیار ممنونم.
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-07-20 15:21:51+00:00): سلام مرسی از زحمات شما. بله اون دوربرگردان بعد از میدان هستش و استفاده کمی داره... اما ما نباید چون چیزی رو غیر ضروری تشخیص میدیم حذف کنیم. سپاس.
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-18 06:38:54+00:00): برای بریدگی (دوربرگردان) هایی که مسیر رفت و برگشت جداگانه ندارند دو مسیر ثبت نکنید.
با سپاس
BCNorwich (2019-06-24 07:02:48+00:00): Hi, it might be good to comment you deletions on the changeset you are amending, thus possibly avoiding the same mistakes recurring.

Regards Bernard.
Andre68 (2019-06-24 20:59:47+00:00): Hi! As I see these kind of errors very often and in nearly all cases the Id editor is involved, I believe that it is very likely a bug in this editor. As I don't use it I also can't write a bug report. May be you can...?
rmikke (2022-01-24 12:19:14+00:00): Ten budynek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182574395/history zasadniczo nie ma adresu. W jakim celu dodałeś ulicę i kod? Jeśli możesz, wypowiedz się na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=852959#p852959
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-24 06:31:00+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.

In your recent edit, you added a pair of parks over a residential property - you can even see the above ground pool and parking garage. Unfortunately, I've had to remove them because they are not accurate to what is on the ground.

OSM is used and relied upon by many organizations all over the world and cannot accept fictional additions. Pretend edits are often found very quickly and removed.

This is how OSM defines a park - 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

You might be able to find some real park locations close by that you can add to the map. If you need any help, please feel free to send me a message or reach out to your local mapping community :).
pk_ravi (2019-07-17 05:36:39+00:00): Hi Riyadi IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 514274347 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
rosh_007 (2019-07-31 07:39:38+00:00): "Hi  Riyadi IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across 

"way 683060367
node 6397994843
node 6397994679
way 683070972"

classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified'. 

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-07-31 08:56:41+00:00): helo ros. thank you for your concern mapping in this area.

first at all, this area isn't surabaya area. it's too far from surabaya and its different districts.
second, i think residential road still make sense if we look over, it still have good hierarchy.
thank you ros
Glassman (2019-06-25 13:12:49+00:00): It looks like someone deleted your park - Please only add valid features to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71549792
keithonearth (2026-06-23 19:19:53+00:00): A couple roads here have been created with maxspeed=0 set, was that intentional?
erenozdemir (2019-06-24 07:30:55+00:00): actually city is not Eskisehir i wrote wrong sorry for that this city should be 'Gaziantep'
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71550150
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-27 06:44:25+00:00): #reported #DWG #spam

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
nevw (2019-06-28 01:19:50+00:00): Hi
please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
bhav_ana (2019-07-23 09:23:57+00:00): Hi  RunRunShow,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Sibu, I have come across the way 699342518
way 699342516
way 699342515
classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.
RunRunShow (2019-07-23 11:36:26+00:00): Hi bhav_ana,

These are driveways into different properties in rural area. When they were plotted, the best imagery at the time was ESRI. The conditions of these roads weren't exactly clear from imagery, but in rural Sarawak most of them are likely not paved or with just gravel surface hence the used of track road.
erenozdemir (2019-06-24 07:37:03+00:00): not antalya, city`s #Ankara
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71550541
user_5359 (2019-06-24 15:17:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a detail look on the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtaxi. Amenity=taxi doesn't means there is the central office, it means here stands the taxi cars.
literan (2019-07-04 20:07:45+00:00): residential/unclassified в городах это именованые улицы низшего класса. Не следует превращать в них обычные неименованные проезды. Поправлю обратно (и не только здесь)
maraf24 (2019-06-27 10:50:41+00:00): To nie jest teren wojskowy.
"update" to nie jest prawidłowy komentarz do zestawu zmian.
ted3sco (2019-07-18 19:27:26+00:00): Salut. Ce s-a intamplat cu drumul nou de pe deal de la Palilula? Era un drum asfaltat, de o banda, cu alveole din loc in loc, noul DC97, chiar daca recent era de smoothness intermediary spre bad. Dar comparabil cu drumul de jos paralel cu padurea era foarte bun pentru rutare.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264421025/history
Acum ruteaza pe un drum prin padure.
Era ok inainte.
Ionut Paduretu (2019-07-19 06:23:00+00:00): Salut. Într-adevăr, drumul de sus pare mai bun. Am considerat că dacă acest drum a fost reabilitat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666847495 autoritățile de acolo vor să devieze traficul spre drumul acela de pământ de la marginea pădurii. Am operat modificările deja, mulțumesc!
Dilancelik (2019-06-24 08:25:20+00:00): i edited highway geometry and fixed the crossing issues, also my imagery source is Maxar Premium :))
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71551977
Dilancelik (2019-06-24 08:40:01+00:00): also i added bridge and layer tags to the highways to fix crossing with waterway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71552127
TheNet1996 (2019-06-24 09:13:25+00:00): Hallo, kannst du bitte prüfen, ob die Tauroggener Straße 95 korrekt ist? Ich denke, die Hausnummer 95 gehört eher zur Kurt-Schumacher-Str. LG & Danke
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-31 07:04:39+00:00): سلام، ضمن سپاس از زحمات شما
کوچه ایمانقلی را بازدید کردم، یک طرفه نیست
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-28 05:41:41+00:00): باسلام
ضمن تشکر بابت توجه شما، انتهای کوچه که اتصال پیاده زده‌اید، ماشین‌رو بوده و به اندازه دو خودرو جای عبور دارد.
fereydoon555 (2020-07-01 06:15:42+00:00): سلام وقت بخیر ممنون از دقت و اصلاح
ChehrehBargi (2020-10-13 07:03:21+00:00): سلامت باشید
cronoser (2022-05-06 18:05:29+00:00): Hola, no borres los parajes, son correctos ya que vienen de una importación del Instituto Geográfico Nacional, he revertido el cambio en el changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120641829
Leo Slager (2019-06-24 10:44:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.