piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kepenu (2022-10-17 15:29:43+00:00): 2022. júliusában minden fórumon 8a-ként hivatkoznak erre a kerékpárútra (a polgármester az alábbi linken lévő interjúban A8-at mond :-). A 24-es bringaútvonal megmarad közúti "kerülőút"-nak. A 82-es melletti bringaútnak biztos, hogy országos számozása lesz. Jelölhetjük akárhogy, de ez országos jelentőségű bringaút lesz.
Ha így szakaszaiban félrevezető, addig visszaminősíthetjük. Én megvárnám a Gyulafirátóti táblákat :-)
kepenu (2022-10-17 15:30:09+00:00): Ja, a link: https://www.veszpremtv.hu/2022/07/19/kerekparut-gyulafiratot-fele/
Antissimo (2022-10-18 05:56:30+00:00): Értem, köszönöm! A táblák valóban eldöntik majd. Én a szám- és névadással megvárnám a táblákat (azaz levenném a 8a-t meg a Győr-Őriszentpétert), mert az OSM-en azért alapvetően olyan adatokat illene megjeleníteni, amik a terepen léteznek, ellenőrizhetők.
kepenu (2022-10-18 06:11:53+00:00): A Győr-Őriszentpéter kapcsolatot nem lehet Construction=yes-szel ellátni?
Antissimo (2022-10-18 06:50:59+00:00): A construction=yes azt jelentené, hogy konkrétan épül valami. Ez egyes kerékpárút-szakaszokra lehet igaz, de egy teljes nyomvonalra egyszerre biztosan nem. Ahogy látom, a 8a-ba pl. beletettél már megépült szakaszokat is.

Az OTrT nyomvonalakat (amilyen a 8a is) elvileg fel lehetne tenni tervezett nyomvonalként, de több gond is van velük, amik miatt levettük őket:
- időben nagyon távlatos, lehet hogy évtizedek alatt épül ki, vagy akkor sem;
- térben nem konkrét, mert ugyan a terv tartalmaz nyomvonalakat, de a törvényben az is le van írva, hogy ezek valójában egy +- 25 km-es (!) sávot jelentenek;
- a számozásuk lényegében egy "munkaszám", amit a polgármester ismer, de valójában az emberek sosem fognak vele találkozni, mert kitáblázva nem az lesz, hanem vélhetően 25-ös, vagy valami efféle.
Antissimo (2022-10-18 06:54:00+00:00): Amire szerintem gondolhattál, az a state=proposed, ezt valóban rá lehetne tenni a relation-re (főleg amíg nincs kitáblázva).
kepenu (2022-10-18 13:02:51+00:00): Mivel ennyire nincs tuti forrás az aktuális bringaúthálózatról, visszavontam az országos 8a-t, Figyelem a fejleményeket Zirc-Kardosréttől északra, meg Eplény-Zirc között. Addig külön network=lcn-ek lesznek.
Antissimo (2022-10-18 13:05:47+00:00): Rendben, köszönöm szépen! Szerintem jó megoldás, és bízzunk a táblázásban! :)
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-08 14:40:44+00:00): Ciao. Come ti dicevo in un altro commento, i numeri civici vanno aggiunti sugli accessi e non sugli edifici. In questo caso oltretutto, era già inserito: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5151664933 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127197848
IlTia (2022-10-08 14:45:25+00:00): Ciao, chiedo scusa colpa del client che uso per notificare le modifiche che ha richiesto l'indirizzo, il mio intento era solo quello di aggiungere orari e altre info. Grazie
Adam_Piszczek (2022-10-08 17:33:50+00:00): Widać bardzo dobrze od ul Harnes co tam robią,jak przebiega budowa.
VA00 (2022-10-08 17:49:38+00:00): Nie objechałem całości dookoła, możesz mieć rację. Ale od LIDL-a jest coś w rodzaju muru z blachy, byłem jedynie w stanie wystawić rękę z aparatem i zrobić zdjęcie. Wszędzie dookoła czarna ,,folia''.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
jqngarcia (2022-10-13 10:07:19+00:00): Hola gaxt, has borrado parte de la calle Olzinelles, es correcto? pasa la linea V% y se está viendo afectada

Salud y Mapas, JQN
gaxt (2022-10-13 20:54:31+00:00): ¡Totalmente sin querer!
¿Como solo tengo el editor Vespucci, podrías hacer un revert?
Nathan_A_RF (2022-10-11 21:51:26+00:00): You have broken a lot of road segments and introduced multiple errors. Please fix.
Nathan_A_RF (2022-10-11 21:58:18+00:00): How and why have you duplicated so many roads along the existing Bluestar 17 route?
wiryfuture (2022-10-12 00:17:19+00:00): I think I undid all the dupes (i didn't make them intentionally i promise) but I'm not sure about fixing segments. There's a bunch of public_transport=1 routes that have forward/backwards that I don't really understand, is that what you're talking about or something else?
Nathan_A_RF (2022-10-12 10:09:42+00:00): Bus routes should be mapped to PTv2. If they are not, then upgrade them if you know how. Please don't mess around with things if you are going to cause so many other issues.
wiryfuture (2022-10-12 12:48:09+00:00): I was stating that most of the mapped ones are v1and are confusing because there is no real life equivalent of "forwards" and "backwards" of routes that go from one place to another 💀
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ptarac (2022-10-16 19:05:14+00:00): This is not a forest !!! Don't use Bing imagery. For Poland, the images available at geoportal.gov.pl are recommended. Do you know this area? If not, don't edit it.
mambus (2022-10-17 08:55:17+00:00): no they have very bad contrast, i will use bing instead
ptarac (2022-10-17 15:35:33+00:00): Work on whatever you want, but do not do stupid things like here that you mark a wet meadow with patches of willows as scrub. You don't know the terrain and you are doing it inaccurately and therefore wrong! Please correct this area.
mambus (2022-10-17 16:49:38+00:00): maybe "heath" is better then?
Frans S (2022-11-22 11:05:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub. 3 out of 4 mappings are actually no buildings. No shadow visible
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127200302
ptarac (2022-10-16 19:05:51+00:00): Don't use Bing imagery. For Poland, the images available at geoportal.gov.pl are recommended. Do you know this area? If not, don't edit it.
Ropino (2022-10-09 16:31:02+00:00): Hi,
What is "X" ?
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:48:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads. You mapped a trace with a lot of offset and tagged it as a path despite it is wide enough to be used by cars, you can see 2 wheel tracks on it. So highway=residential is a better tag




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127201184
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-23 16:49:55+00:00): Can you repair https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101954273 and other in this area that you added?

#mapwithai buildings often need manual adjustment to match reality and you should not accept ones clearly mismatching aerial imagery but rather fix what automatic pattern matcher failed to handle
Frans S (2022-10-09 12:30:47+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/  you tagged a residential road as a major highway.

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.


Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127202889
Lejun (2022-10-09 06:10:34+00:00): Salut, bienvenue dans la communauté et un grand merci pour la contribution.

Pas de soucis flagrant à première vue, si ce n’est l’ajout en triplicat du restaurant (amenity=restaurant) La fine bouche (name=La fine bouche). L’idée était là mais selon nos données il n’y a qu’un seul bâtiment principal[1]. Les deux autres[2][3] ne sont que des extensions de toit importées selon le Cadastre (qui peut comporter des erreurs) et qui sont indiquées à l’aide de wall=no. À cela deux solutions, soit n’ajouter le restaurant que sur le bâtiment à propement parler, soit l’indiquer sous la forme d’un point « central » au bâtiment complet.

Je te laisse corriger ça, la communauté reste à disposition si besoin est.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287031213
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287029578
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287028518
Lejun (2022-10-09 06:15:04+00:00): Ah, et pour l’adresse mail du Corto tu peux utiliser email soit :

email=lecorto.slm@gmail.com
sorcrosc (2022-10-10 19:36:22+00:00): Non eliminare i nomi dei ponti e dei tunnel per favore. Nel tag "name" va il nome della strada e questo non cambia se c'è un ponte o un tunnel.

Ciao
Frans S (2022-10-13 12:57:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127204022
ivanbranco (2024-02-29 16:11:08+00:00): Ciao soservus, che tipo di attrazione é "Il Piazzale del Astronomia"?
IlBano (2022-12-31 16:35:14+00:00): Ciao ぱ ちゃに.
In questo changeset hai rimosso il peduncolo che da questa way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61844404
porta alla svolta verso destra sulla SP124, quando è evidente la presenza di una corsia dedicata. Inoltre, avendo lasciato la relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52946337, di fatto c'è l'obbligo di svolta a sinistra.

Puoi per cortesia verificare e correggere ?

Grazie

IlBano
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-08 17:18:31+00:00): Cliff yra rimtas skardis, kurio įveikimui reikia papildomos alpinizmo įrangos.
francians (2022-10-09 14:18:51+00:00): Ciao Franco,

volevo chiederti una cortesia, quando un elemento OSM corrisponde ad un item su Wikidata, puoi inserire la categoria Commons su Wikidata?
Questo è sufficiente a certi data consumer (es. OsmAnd) per mostrare le immagini... Anche senza ripeterli su OSM. Se vuoi metterli in entrambi i posti, seppure escano 2 volte, non è un problema.
Buon mapping
Francesco
Francoerbi41 (2022-10-09 15:31:42+00:00): Onestamente ci avevo pensato.
Poi ho notato che lo stavi facendo tu molto bene e non ho voluto interferire.
FE
francians (2022-10-09 15:46:42+00:00): Ok. Nessuna interferenza, anzi una mano è sempre gradita. Io ti ho scritto soprattutto per il futuro, in cui avremo più elementi abbinati e, quindi, sarà più difficile intercettare che manca la foto su wikidata, ma c'è su OSM... Tutto qui.
Filip009 (2022-11-27 12:08:28+00:00): Dobrý deň, telefónne čísla sa uvádzajú vo formáte +421 XXX XXX XXX
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10083993344/history
Msiipola (2022-12-28 11:46:56+00:00): Här går ny stig i sjön! Stigen ligger kanske rätt, men i så fall behöver kanter på sjö justeras
sandos (2022-12-28 21:04:18+00:00): Stämmer som du säger. Gjorde en liten korrigering
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:36:18+00:00): Závora sa značí ako bod a je súčasťou danej cesty.
Takéto čiarky sa nekreslia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102019352

tu je príklad na závoru
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3248982560

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlift_gate
Waffelo (2022-10-09 08:51:11+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, opravim to.
Ewen Hill (2022-10-08 22:49:15+00:00): Thanks Jomox for the excellent updates. I assume that this section will now alternate between north to south so should the one way be removed for most of the bridge or make it atleast routable from the south? I have no supporting truth for this though, just logic that it's probably more important to get goods to Crimea rather than the other way.
Larmax (2022-10-08 19:44:37+00:00): Tuossako on jyrkänne?
abakus_uploader (2022-10-08 22:32:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_2066394 (2022-10-08 16:22:04+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
will_p (2022-11-16 16:40:48+00:00): Hi Alex,

In this changeset you have updated several shops in Arnold and added addresses to shops already mapped. Please could you confirm the source used. It doesn't appear on be from survey and the NCC Street Register mentioned in your changeset sources only relates to adopted highways in the city council area, so does not appear relevant.

Thanks,
Will
alexkemp (2022-11-17 12:09:51+00:00): Hi Will

>  the NCC Street Register mentioned in your changeset sources only relates to adopted highways in the city council area

The previous para is incorrect. *Street Register* also includes Arnold. Check it for yourself.
will_p (2022-11-17 14:12:17+00:00): Hi Alex,

I think I see where you are getting the address data from now, but it raises a lot of questions. In particular, I can't see how the address search on the street register page could be suitably licensed for use in OSM. 

This is the page I am looking at: https://geoserver.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/streetregister/
Before you can access that page you must agree to some restrictive terms and conditions. Furthermore there is no mention made of any data released under an open licence. The terms and conditions state you are only granted a revocable licence to view the data for non-commercial purposes. Next it says copying or otherwise making the data available is not permitted at all. It indicates that some of the data comes from the Ordnance Survey under the Public Sector Geospatial Agreement.

Some of the layers shown on that page have been released elsewhere under the Open Government Licence, specifically:
Adopted Highways: https://www.opendatanottingham.org.uk/dataset.aspx?id=177
Public Rights of Way: https://www.opendatanottingham.org.uk/dataset.aspx?id=74
The addresses, however, must surely come from a closed dataset. This is particularly clear with the addresses in Arnold. The city council is not responsible for addresses in Arnold. Therefore the addresses must come from a third party, perhaps Addressbase, which is mentioned on the terms and conditions page.

It is also possible you got some of the addresses from the background imagery, which appears to be derived from Ordnance Survey Mastermap or a similar product. Again this is not suitable for use in OSM.

Am I missing something? What leads you to think the address data on that page can be copied into OSM?

Thanks,
Will
alexkemp (2022-11-17 14:25:05+00:00): If you believe any of that, then you are welcome to revert any or all of my edits.

All the best.
will_p (2022-11-17 14:50:26+00:00): I don't want to remove anything myself. I will send a message to the Data Working Group and they can decide what action, if any, needs to be taken.
alexkemp (2022-11-17 18:52:41+00:00): There are zero edits to be 'actioned'. I used Bing (offset checked) + the cadastral parcels to fix bad mapping & confirmed with Street Register that some address numbers were wrong & fixed those as well. Nothing was "copied" from anywhere.

Sorry that you got butt-hurt. Again. You really need to fix that.
JayTurnr (2023-06-15 15:50:44+00:00): In this changeset, you changed Thomas Cook to Hays Travel, but the following note was just updated to say this is an estate agent. Was the Hays Travel verified on the ground or presumed based on how many of the Thomas Cooks became Hays Travels?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353944520
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3246761
alexkemp (2023-06-16 23:49:41+00:00): Hello Jay, thanks for the comment.
      
It is the latter rather than the former. If a local states that it is now an Estate Agent then I would definitely accept that (ah! I see that you have). Gosh, it seems very much longer than 8 months ago (I thought that it was during the pandemic & lockdown) & I can remember very little now about the specifics. I am also sorry that this Arnold (Nottingham) store got mixed up with my Stockton & Darlington mapping.
       
HTH
alexkemp (2023-06-17 19:20:41+00:00): Hi *Jay*, this is an extra to my previous reply this early morning.    
      
The mixup in my Arnold mapping getting a changeset title that belonged with my S&D Railway mapping caused *me* to get mixed up in my response to you. Let's try again to separate the two & give you a more sensible response.    
      
You said *“you changed Thomas Cook to Hays Travel”*.    
      
I recalled from the S&D mapping that there was a central building that was the original terminus, and that it's name had changed in more modern times. I therefore thought almost all the way through my original reply that that was the building that you were speaking about. It also made sense since I did not recall changing any names of any buildings in the Arnold mapping (although of course I did change at least one, as the [History](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353944520/history) indicates).    
      
Almost all the mapping that I did in Arnold in that changeset was to update the building outlines using JOSM's *cadastral parcels*. Shops had been placed in the middle of streets, some shops concatenated together & all sorts of things. It was a mess, similar to the mess that I made in my early mapping days due to not checking Bing's GPS offset.    
      
Fortunately, the local council has a [StreetRegister](https://geoserver.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/streetregister/) which maintains an updated list of businesses & addresses with postcodes. I took the new-name of the business from that listing. Those names, addresses & postcodes are all available under a public licence. Unfortunately the whole thing has an unpleasant taste due to use of Ordnance Survey mapping on the website (postcodes, etc. do not belong to the OS, but they insist on a tickbox to view the mapping onscreen).    
      
HTH
eggie (2022-10-08 15:47:32+00:00): Dag Albert.. Hier loopt knooppuntwandelroute 6-17 . Heb je enig idee hoe die nu loopt.. of komt het bruggetje weer terug?

MVG
eggie
vincento66 (2022-10-09 14:36:37+00:00): Geen idee of het bruggetje weer terugkomt, maar stukje verderop naar het zuiden kan je wel het slootje over. 

Je kan echter niet langs het slootje lopen, want daar staat een hek. Dus moet je terug naar de Westerweg. 
De andere oversteek staat ook op de kaart.
eggie (2022-10-09 15:05:22+00:00): We laten het maar even zo.. Het knooppunt ligt ook daar.. Dan krijg je een wel erg gekunstelde route.
Iets voor de wandelroutemappers.
Groet eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 19:09:41+00:00): De route is al aangepast https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127215867#map=16/52.4833/4.9665&layers=N

Groet
eggie
martinst (2022-10-08 16:45:55+00:00): Fahrwege für zweispurige Fahrzeuge werden als highway=track eingetragen, path ist hier falsch.
Und access=no stimmt sicher auch nicht weil das bedeuten würde dass wirklich niemand sich da fortbewegen darf.
skyper (2022-11-09 14:23:34+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account,
warum hast Du denn die Rollen der Haltestellen geändert?
Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-14 23:47:04+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
hayes9 (2022-10-13 21:05:04+00:00): Hello G626, thank you for contributing to the OSM project. I noticed that the European route E 86 was significantly reworked by this changeset, but cannot find any support of the new layout in aerial imageries. Would you please explain the source which has prompted these changes?
eggie (2022-10-08 16:50:55+00:00): Dag Klaasjan.. Wanneer er staat (onderbord) 'alleen voor aanwonenden' dan access=destination algemeen.
Het ligt er een beetje aan welk bord er verder bij staat.
Wanneer dit een C1 bord is dan geldt het alleen voor alles met wielen en mag je er gewoon wandelen of hardlopen.
.. en is access=destination niet correct.
C1 geldt niet voor voetgangers. Het zal dan vehicle=destination zijn.
Dus wel bord en welk onderbord staat hier.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-08 17:41:12+00:00): en wellicht is het access=private als er een bordje art 461 wvs vooraan staat?
KlaasjanElzinga (2022-10-09 10:45:51+00:00): Het ging idd om het wetboek van strafrecht bord. Ik kan niet beoordelen of je die er zo neer kunt hangen maar er hingen duidelijk een tweetal van deze borden. Ik maak er een nieuwe change voor.
eggie (2022-10-09 11:48:09+00:00): Art. Bordjes ophangen mag inderdaad niet zomaar. De weg zal dan aan de openbaarheid onttrokken moeten zijn. Daar is een procedure voor.
ika-chan! (2022-10-12 22:24:32+00:00): I am confident that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102121440 does not reflect reality, according to Maxar Premium Imagery: they are usually recent.
Frans S (2022-10-09 12:24:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127208738