piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zwombie (2022-08-07 21:44:26+00:00): do you have local information? according to the imagery and the missing Link to any other finshed road I thought it to be a road under construction
A67-A67 (2022-08-08 13:35:23+00:00): This was an already existing service road, that is now a service road for construction traffic. This construction traffic can also use roads under construction, so the no link error you probably tried to solve, is a false positive.

This road won't be part of the final road network, so it clearly isn't a road under construction. The Castiliëlaan will be the main access road for motor traffic.
Ropino (2022-10-19 08:00:31+00:00): Hi,
what do you mean with:
"highway=prohibited" + "name=Light" as node?
natto_motta (2022-11-08 17:28:36+00:00): Oi, por gentileza, ainda sou novo aqui e estou tentando aprender sozinho, mas não está fácil.  Você pode me dizer onde exatamente está sua dúvida! Eu quando fico em dúvida procuro nas dicas, mas as vezes atrapalha ainda mais hihihi.

Desculpa a demora para responder, nas últimas semanas tenho editado pouco.
Ropino (2022-11-08 20:02:49+00:00): Hello,
my question has since been resolved.
It was change with:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127954095
by marczoutendijk.
thx for response.
kubahahaha (2022-08-04 00:03:24+00:00): https://imgur.com/Seu2LV2
Allison P (2022-08-03 22:16:46+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.
ovruni (2022-08-03 23:41:30+00:00): Por favor no retire los nombres anteriores para agregar el nombre EDIFICIO.
Saludos
JJIglesias (2022-08-04 00:41:15+00:00): Hace falta un registro de Mapillary y KartaView de ese nuevo cruce en todos los sentidos

Slds
JJ
5m4u9 (2022-08-04 01:07:20+00:00): Hola, cierto. El otro día fui por el lugar y no había continuidad para capturar. Iré en las sgtes semanas. Sería genial capturar una vuelta completa: perú -> tadeo haenke -> beijing -> d'orbigny y viceversa.
JJIglesias (2022-08-05 07:23:15+00:00): En unos dias yo la hare, dame chance Norte-Sur, Este y Oeste
Que estes bien
JJ
kornad (2022-08-05 08:34:47+00:00): Witaj. Wiem, że użytkownik wprowadzający tamtą zmianę wprowadza wandalizm na masową skalę w OSM, ale wydaje mi się, że ta zmiana była akurat prawidłowa. Tor ten jest używany obecnie przez tramwaje kończące trasę i zmieniające kierunek jazdy. W mojej ocenie tag railway=disused jest nieprawidłowy dla tego toru. Pozdrawiam
czebureks (2022-08-06 04:04:02+00:00): Cześć, przywróciłem railway=tram. Pozdrawiam również
mtmail (2022-08-15 13:57:40+00:00): What does "Unconfirmed housenumber as there is none listed on google" mean? Have you copied data, e.g. other house numbers, from Google Maps?
DerZombiiie (2022-08-17 11:06:05+00:00): some, but most are from memory, i use maps just to sanity check house borders (using the higher res imagery)

also: u went there and checked, they are correct (Rotkehlchenweg)
ovruni (2022-08-03 23:42:17+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta de nombre no esta destinada para agregar nombres genéricos como "Edificio". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Tilia_J (2022-08-06 08:41:02+00:00): Goedemorgen, de door jou toegevoegde vuilnisbakken zijn in werkelijkheid ondergrondse afvalcontainers.

Zou je dit willen wijzigen?
Herman Lee (2022-08-04 00:16:31+00:00): 您好，请使用中文作为name名称，请使用区域绘制学校，谢谢。
Herman Lee (2022-08-04 01:30:30+00:00): 该修改集已经退回
ivanbranco (2022-08-04 19:40:11+00:00): Ciao Alessio,

mi sembra ci sia un po' di confusione sulla provinciale, ora in alcune parti si chiama "Strada Provinciale 596 dei Cairoli", in altre (way/79560312) "SP596", un'altra parte ancora "SS596 dei Cairoli", e ancora "SS596". Hai cambiato un ref da "SPexSS596" a "SS596" mentre un altro ref lo hai cambiato da "SS596" a "SP596". Una gran confusione insomma.

Qua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083630381

hai creato un edificio gigante che in realtà non c'è. iD ha anche provato ad avvisarti che si intersecava con una strada ma tu hai solo cliccato il suggerimento proposto aggiungendo un layer=1 al tutto.

Per favore fai piu' attenzione quando editi. Se hai domande ti segnalo che esiste un gruppo Telegram dove altri utenti possono aiutarti.

Buon mapping
alessiodea (2022-08-04 23:06:57+00:00): ciao, la strada si chiama SP596 in territorio Piemontese, e SS596 in territorio lombardo (fino alla rotonda entrando a mortara passando da ceretto) dato che è da poco passata sotto il controllo dell'anas (https://www.stradeanas.it/it/le-strade/anas-regione). ora comunque metto a posto gli errori !
alessiodea (2022-08-04 23:11:58+00:00): poi, scusami per il disturbo, non so perchè nella mappa quella che vedi aprendo il sito la vedo corretta, mentre in quella che raggiungi tramite EDIT la vedo come se non fossero state applicate alcune modifiche fatte da me in precedenza
alessiodea (2022-08-04 23:13:26+00:00): errore mio, la strada è di competenza anas anche in territorio piemontese, risolvo subito
VLD194 (2022-08-03 23:47:46+00:00): Adjusted*
martinst (2022-08-04 16:37:01+00:00): landuse=privat gibt es nicht und passt nicht zu einem Gebäude. Es soll wohl access=private heißen?
Tipp: Mit der Taste Q kann man im iD Editor Flächen und Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:57:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352095
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:22:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351609
Udarian (2022-08-11 02:02:42+00:00): meant retail
Herman Lee (2022-08-04 01:27:45+00:00): 屑
bikingaround244 (2022-09-14 12:16:58+00:00): I disagree that it is "unfriendly to bikes" in a study done in 2015. 

" In the past 12 months, have you encountered issues regarding communication, courtesy and civility among bicyclists, pedestrians and others on the path that affect your use and enjoyment of the SWC pathways? If yes, describe.

Over half of respondents say that they "rarely or never" encounter issues about civility or courtesy on the path.... and another four out ten say "yes, sometimes," and only about one out of ten say "yes, frequently."  

Also one of the major modes of travel down it is biking

"Q1: How do you usually use the Southwest Corridor Park paths? (Check all that apply)

When asked how they generally use the Southwest Corridor path, about 75% of survey respondents said bicycle, an overlapping 73% said walking, and another overlapping 30% said jogging/running"

(http://swcpc.org/results.asp)

***I think the proper tag should be "Cycle & Foot Path” highway=cycleway along with bicycle=designated and foot=designated. Not highway=path.***
aweech (2022-09-14 21:04:48+00:00): Multi-use paths are not tagged highway=cycleway. That survey says the Mass Ave - Dartmouth Street section of the SWC has less conflict between pedestrians and bicyclists, and I'd say it's because so few bicyclists use it because it's so pedestrian centric. Just look at the Strava heatmap; beyond Ruggles Columbus Ave is a much more popular route. Not to mention that those sidewalks the SWC path runs on are narrower in places than the sidewalks on Columbus Ave! You might get lucky and hit the path with less congestion, but the entire built environment there screams that the park is for pedestrians primarily.
impiaaa (2022-08-04 17:03:21+00:00): Hello and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. What do you mean by "from null"? If this is a machine-generated change, please note that such changes are subject to rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
ech_ptm (2022-08-04 18:26:04+00:00): This was not machine generated.  I work at El Camino Hospital (dba El Camino Health).  The Level value was not filled out (i.e. it was Null), so I populated it as a 2 story building.  Is that allowed?
impiaaa (2022-08-04 18:49:39+00:00): Yes, that's allowed, and again thank you for your contribution! "null" is a term that frequently shows up in computer errors, so I was initially suspicious.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 04:11:12+00:00): Hello.
2 road segments have speed limit of 59mph? 🤨Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124457384
snake21 (2022-08-06 20:09:08+00:00): @MxxCon that was a typo, thank you for catching! I just corrected it.
RedAuburn (2024-05-24 16:26:10+00:00): hiya, what is amenity=small_electric_vehicle? would be great to have your input on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4262761
:)
santamariense (2026-02-12 13:48:15+00:00): Olá eliabecampos1,

Qual fonte tu utilizou para fazer estas atualizações nos nomes de ruas? 

Importante frizar também que se o nome que estava antes era utilizado e não é mais, deve-se manter na tag old_name=* e se for um nome alternativo, deve ir em alt_name=*. Isso faz com que se alguém pesquisar por outros nomes, ainda acham a rua.

Bons mapeamentos,

santamariense
user_5359 (2022-08-13 06:03:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1083642840. What is the meaning of the tags
casamento = festas_casamento
sitio = sitio_alguel_festas
MxxCon (2022-08-05 04:16:26+00:00): Hello.
According to https://vzv.nyc/ Throgs Neck Bridge and segments nearby have speed limit of 25, not 45. Could you please elaborate what is your change based on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124457869
snake21 (2022-08-06 20:11:53+00:00): @MxxCon there must be a data error on the vision zero page, as that is inconsistent with signs that are depicted on the road itself.
MxxCon (2022-08-06 20:25:42+00:00): Do those speed signs look new, as in the speed limit was recently changed?
The website says their data is current as of 6/30/2022
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:45:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351946
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 14:43:57+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
fortera_au (2024-01-20 07:57:40+00:00): Hi, can you please confirm your source for this and other edits, I believe this has possibly been taken from a source we cannot use.
nevw (2022-08-04 04:47:26+00:00): Hi
you could be use a more specific tag for the buildings you are adding.
e.g. building=house
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Spencer Sanford (2025-12-24 21:11:55+00:00): Where did you find information on the Gamble Lane proposal?
MxxCon (2022-08-05 04:24:37+00:00): Hello.
You updated Fairfield library's street as "C-625". Could you please elaborate on that? That doesn't seem like a proper street name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124459330
nevw (2022-08-04 06:12:00+00:00): Hi
Are you able to map the boundary and access ways to this park as it is not readily discernible from the map or satellite imagery.
nevw (2022-08-05 02:40:47+00:00): I think this addition of a park here is mistaken. It looks more like a private driveway and residential houses.
Yarra Glen boundary and a label on Bell Street near the shopping centre is already mapped.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2423695
reigi (2022-08-04 04:51:24+00:00): Hi tuennes, nach meinem Wissen ist der von dir gelöschte Weg, zumindest was den Teil betrifft, der durch den Wald führt, definitiv vorhanden. Für die Benutzung spielt es lt. den in Deutschland geltenden rechtlichen Vorschriften  keine Rolle, ob er über Privateigentum führt oder nicht. Lt. unseren OSM-Gepflogenheiten mappen wir OTG, also das was vorhanden ist, mappen wir. Deswegen bitte ich dich, die Löschung wieder rückgängig zu machen.
tuennes (2022-08-04 09:52:49+00:00): Hallo reigi,
Es ist so, dass der ca. 0,5 m breite, überwachsene Pfad durch den Wald dort zwar vorhanden ist, nach einer Linksbiegung aber nach weiteren ca. 30 m als Sackgasse endet.
An genau dieser Stelle erfolgte der (illegale) Durchgang zu dem Feld eines Bauern, auf welchem der Pfad lt. OSM weiter geführt wurde. Dieser Pfad existiert real nicht!

Als ich das letzte Mal dort war, war der Bauer gerade damit beschäftigt, den Durchgang zu seinem Feld zum wiederholten Male mit Holzstämmen zu versperren.
Lt. seiner Aussage wäre es zuletzt so gewesen, dass ganze Reitergruppen ihm regelmäßig sein frisch eingesätes Maisfeld zertrampelt hätten. Lt. der vorgefundenen Spuren kamen diese aus dem Wald.
Die von ihm bisher daraufhin erstellten Blockaden wurden auch  immer wieder durch Dritte entfernt.

Genau us diesem Grund habe ich den kurzen Sackgassen-Pfad durch den Wald mit entfernt.
Damit sich niemand motiviert fühlt, die Blockade am Ende des Pfades wieder zu entfernen und dabei fremdes Eigentum zu beschädigen.

Den schmalen Pfad gab es offiziell auch nie. Ich wohne quasi "um die Ecke", und komme regelmässig mit dem Bike dort auf dem Hauptweg vorbei.

Ich denke, als OSMler sollten wir das Eigentum anderer respektieren. Auch wenn uns dadurch evtl. ein schmaler, kurzer Pfad fehlt, der aber eh nirgends hinführt.

Die Sache mit dem plötzlich auf der OSM-Karte vorhandenen Parkplatz mitten im Wald, zu dem kein für motorisierte Fahrzeuge freigegebener Weg führt:
Ich frage mich, wer macht so was?
In letzter Zeit sah ich dort oft mehrere Autos parken. Das muss nun wirklich nicht sein.
Wenn ich im Wald laufen gehen kann, dann kann ich auch mein Fahrzeug auf der nur 50 m entfernten, öffentlichen Straße abstellen, oder?

Alles nicht böse oder gar persönlich gemeint.

Viele Grüße, 
Tuennes
reigi (2022-08-04 11:41:44+00:00): Hallo tuennes, zunächst mal danke für die ausführliche Erläuterung. Deine Beweggründe kann ich damit gut nachvollziehen. Ist mir selbst vor einigen Jahren auch mal so gegangen und ich stand am Ende des Weges vor einem Bach wenn ich mich richtig erinnere. Man hätte natürlich auch nur den Weg nach der Biegung entfernen können. Aber ich denke, so wie du es begründest ist es auch ok.
Der "Parkplatz" wurde vor über 10 Jahren von einem seit 6 Jahren nicht mehr aktiven User eingezeichnet. Ich stimme dir in deiner Argumentation zu, weiß auf der anderen Seite aber auch, dass er vorwiegend von Hundegespann-Führern genutzt wird. Die suchen natürlich eine Gelegenheit, wo sie in Ruhe ihre Hunde vor ihre Gefährte spannen können. Naja, manchmal muss man eben leben und leben lassen. :-)
tuennes (2022-08-04 14:54:11+00:00): Hallo reigi,
Danke für die Info zur Nutzung des "Parkplatzes". Mir war der auf der Karte tatsächlich erst vor ca. 2 Wochen aufgefallen (andere Zoomstufe?).
Ich habe grundsätzlich nichts dagegen, wenn jemand aus den von Dir genannten oder anderen wichtigen Gründen die Fläche auf diese Weise nutzt - solange sein Fahrzeug Öl-dicht ist, und ich als MTBler noch ungehindert dran vorbeikomme.
Das sehe ich genau wie Du: leben und leben lassen.

Aber diesen Menschen soll dann auch klar sein, dass sie das eigenverantwortlich und ohne rechtliche Grundlage tun.
Daher denke ich: besser keine Kennzeichnung auf der Karte.

Aus einem Feldweg wird ja keine Landstraße, nur weil ihn täglich 20 Autofahrer widerrechtlich benutzen ;-).
Du verstehst, was ich meine!?

Danke & viele Grüße, vielleicht sieht man sich mal draußen, 
tuennes
Zian Choy (2022-09-05 19:14:31+00:00): Where did you find the "SA 660" information? I couldn't see it when I visited the road recently.
SUPER HEROS 67 (2022-08-06 12:10:37+00:00): Bonjour Titi72,

Suite a ta demande de vérification, j'ai réajuster les erreurs que tu as fait.

Note : Quand tu fait des chemins piétons, comme par exemple d'en un cimetière tu n'as pas besoin de mettre un nom au chemin, pour dire que c'est le chemin central du cimetière.

Bonne journée
Cordialement
SUPER HEROS 67
Titi72 T (2022-08-06 16:01:47+00:00): D'accord.
Concernant mes erreurs, afin que je puisse m'améliorer, quelles sont-elles ?
À part bein-sûr celle que tu m'as précisé : le nommage inutile du chemin du cimetière (j'hésitais, mais sans doute je voulais être plus royaliste que le roi :-)

D'autre part, j'ai constaté que mes ajouts de "places de parkings destinées aux PMR" que j'ai ajoutées et que j'ai nommées 3PMR", mais comme cela ne s'affichait pas (quel que soit le niveau de zoom, une fois les modifs faites (c'est-à-dire en mode "consultation" (pas en mode "modifier", là c'est normal que ça s'affiche, car on peut zoomer beaucoup plus qu'en mode "consultation"). J'ai donc re-modifié pour supprimer MON ajout de "Nom propre", mais même en lmaissant le nom d'origine du symbole (celui attribué par OSM au symbole), c'est-à-dire : « Place de parking réservée aux personnes handicapées», cela n'affiche toujours pas ce nom, une fois basculé en mode "consulmtation de carte. J'avais mis UNE place de parking PMR tout à gauche sur le parking du cimetière, et DEUX (un symbole avec le chiffre "2" places) sur le parking de la salle des fêtes : pareil : on ne le voit même pas, ni l'emplacement, ni le symbole, ni le nom... bref c'est comme si je n'en n'avais pas ajouté...
Il y a sans doute un épisode que j'ai loupé...
Idem pour les "panneaux de signalisation routière" : j'en avais ajoutés ici sur la route qui pase sous le cimetière (à l'endroit de la vague : panneau "Zone 30", et le même panneau au centre du village, juste au passage piéton, sous l'usine DeDietrich, et d'autres panneaux routiers aussi : ils ne s'affichent pas. Alors que les panneaux 'd'indications" (directions) eux s'affichent...
bizarre... Je parle bien-sûr en mode "consultation" (c'est le but, pour que le public (même non inscrit sur OSM) qui consulte la carte puisse les voir.

Merci ! Bonne journée.
SUPER HEROS 67 (2022-08-07 11:17:46+00:00): Pour les places de parking PMR tu les avait dessiner, mais je l'ai est supprimer, car tu avait déjà remplis l'attributs sur les parking qu'il y avait des places PMR.

Ensuite pour ce qui est des panneaux de signalisation, il ne s'affiche pas tous tout dépend du rendu de la carte que tu utilise.
eggie (2022-08-04 10:42:07+00:00): Probably a track... 
reverted
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:03:11+00:00): Thank you for the feedback and reverting this edit, but can I ask for feedback? To me, it is a map quality problem that non-navigable elements (cycleway) are disrupting the connection between a navigable highway (track) and a general road network. Is there any concern about assuring routing?
eggie (2022-08-05 11:18:48+00:00): It's not logical.. I agree... But sometimes cycleways are use for service by the local authorities.
Ther is a gate.. The road is for maitenance perhaps..  
You app or tour tells you This is impossible.. but in fact it is right.
Gan_toon (2022-08-09 14:39:53+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, eggie! I really appreciate it.
Richard (2022-08-04 09:24:03+00:00): You have changed a road from highway=bridleway (implies bicycle, horse and foot access rights) to highway=track (does not imply any access rights). This is going to negatively affect bicycle, foot and horse routing. Please revert this change.
Swihail (2022-08-05 12:48:09+00:00): Here again, I was in error. I will regroup.
eggie (2022-08-04 10:40:19+00:00): okay
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:02:30+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
eggie (2022-08-04 10:38:16+00:00): reverted by changeset      #124473887
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:00:34+00:00): My intent was to create connections between navigable elements for improved navigation, but I understand that is not aligned with OSM practice, so thank you reverting this edit.
eggie (2022-08-05 11:05:53+00:00): Hi...

Thanks for reply. I think the tool you are using creates false positives... because the way starts from a path or cycleway.

Greetz
Eggie
Gan_toon (2022-08-09 14:38:27+00:00): Thanks, eggie. Editing in the quality check challenges has been paused globally while these false positives are being looked into.
eggie (2022-08-09 14:41:23+00:00): Yes I know...
Thanks for reply
Greetz
Eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-06 06:40:37+00:00): What source do you have for this new road?
emersonveenstra (2022-08-05 21:10:27+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6996249764 you added noexit=yes, but that is not a correct tag since there are multiple ways connecting to it. noexit=yes is only for nodes with one way connected to them. I've fixed it for you, but please keep that in mind when mapping in the future. Thanks!
thetornado76 (2022-08-05 21:18:08+00:00): Thank you for the correction. I made a mistake.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-05 21:27:34+00:00): No problem, thanks for mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Zian Choy (2022-09-03 22:43:39+00:00): Where did you find the "ref" value for Balour Drive ("SC 1460")? I didn't see it on a sign when I drove along the road this week.
Richard (2022-08-04 09:23:35+00:00): You have changed a road from highway=bridleway (implies bicycle, horse and foot access rights) to highway=track (does not imply any access rights). This is going to negatively affect bicycle, foot and horse routing. Please revert this change.
Swihail (2022-08-05 12:49:42+00:00): This has been a learning process. I apologize for the inconvenience to you.
eggie (2022-08-04 10:37:16+00:00): reverted by changeset #124473858
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:01:16+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. Thank You for reverting the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
eggie (2022-08-05 11:06:52+00:00): Jolly good! 😀
arcturusss (2022-11-22 12:04:02+00:00): Why did you move traffic_signals from crossing point? Is there some new mapping scheme? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1464384944
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-08-04 10:36:23+00:00): Okay!
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:02:07+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-08-04 10:27:58+00:00): Hi Gan toon..

Reverted..
Not every road thats starts at a cycleway is footway...   That is the problem with your edits.

This is a serviceroad for maintenance of the raillway
So don't yous the ToTom tool in the Netherlands.

Hive a nice day
eggie
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:04:57+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. Thank You for reverting the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
eggie (2022-08-05 11:15:44+00:00): Oke  .. jolly good!
Thanks for reply.
eggie
dvdhoven (2022-08-04 14:53:14+00:00): Reverted this changeset
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:38:40+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. I have reverted the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
dvdhoven (2022-08-04 14:48:39+00:00): Reverted this changeset. Service should not be converted to footway
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:40:48+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. I have reverted the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
eggie (2022-08-04 10:17:57+00:00): reverted by changeset#124473082