piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber (2020-05-24 08:50:31+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).


Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
muralito (2020-05-20 02:17:12+00:00): Hola.

Por favor, no agregues elementos ficiticios.
eggie (2020-05-19 21:12:53+00:00): Dag Plancius... Wat is nu eigenlijk je edit hier.
Die Paltzerweg spoorwegovergang lijkt dubbel toegevoegd? 
Wat was dan je bedoeling hier? 

Je kunt toch niet gewoon wegen over wegen trekken omdat dat zo uitkomt. 
Verder is editor totaal ongeschikt om routerelaties in te leggen.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-19 21:14:06+00:00): Verder is het gebied van je edits nauwelijks te checken. De weg over het spoor zal ik verwijderen.
eggie (2020-05-19 21:22:37+00:00): Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed. 
De dubbele Paltzerweg heb ik verwijderd en je fietsroute over de reeds bestaande weg gelegd.
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM 
Die is geschikter om zoiets ingewikkelds toe te voegen als een fietsroute.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-19 21:37:12+00:00): Vraag anders even hulp op het forum hoe een snelfietsroute in te leggen in de bestaande wegen. Daar zitten de specialisten. 
network=rcn heb ik ook m'n twijfels
dvdhoven (2020-05-20 07:20:24+00:00): rcn kan naar mijn idee prima. Het is een regionale route, geen lokale.
En nu we onderscheid kunnen maken tussen knooppuntroutes en gewone routes, kan rcn goed.
Veel vervelender is dat ik een ruim uur bezig geweest ben om de sorteringen van diverse knooppuntroutes en de LF9 te herstellen.
Er zijn op allerlei plekken doorknipacties geweest en er is met ID gwerkt op plekken waar knooppuntroutes liggen, dan vernield ID gratis en voor niks de sortering, ook soms op plekken, waar je helemaal niet bent geweest. Fantastische tool dat ID!!! 
En nog erger is dat deze route totaal geen rekening houdt met eenrichting fietspaden. De snelfietsroute is zo zonder meer over eenrichting paden gelegd. 
Dat moet echter met forward, backward gedaan worden over de fietspaden aan beide kanten van de weg.
En dat is iets waar toch echt de nodige ervaring voor nodig is en JOSM gebruikt moet worden. Met ID kun je dat niet.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2020-05-20 07:26:39+00:00): Dick.. bedankt.. Wellicht kan Plancius er wat mee.
Gr eggie
Plancius (2020-05-20 11:25:13+00:00): Dag Egbert en Dick,

Bedankt voor jullie feedback op de wijzigingen. Ik was mij er niet van bewust dat de ID editor niet geschikt is hiervoor. Excuses voor het verstoren van de volgorde van paden waar ik niet mee bezig ben geweest.

Bovendien kwam ik er later achter dat de online editor op sommige plekken de paden niet liet zien, waardoor ik bij de spoorwegovergang geen weg zag lopen tussen de noord- en zuidkant. Daarmee lijkt de online editor dus onbruikbaar voor alle soorten wijzigingen.

Mijn plan was om de route van Utrecht naar Amersfoort eerst te markeren en later de forward/backward rollen (plus fietspaden voor de terugweg, bijvoorbeeld in Bilthoven) toe te voegen. Ik zag dat mogelijk leek in ID (relatie rol), maar uit jullie reactie begrijp ik dat dit beter met JOSM gedaan kan worden. Bedankt voor de tips, ik zal deze editor eens gaan bestuderen.
Plancius (2020-05-20 11:28:16+00:00): Eggie, als aanvulling nog een vraag: je geeft aan dat 'het gebied van mijn edits nauwelijks te checken is', wat bedoel je hier precies mee? Kan ik de changesets beter klein houden?
eggie (2020-05-20 12:17:36+00:00): Plancius.. eerst dank voor je reactie.
Ja.. die online editor is een speeltje... niet geschikt voor routerelaties. een routekiller. maar daar was je nu achter.
JOSM is de editor waar diehards mee werken. Je ontkomt er toch niet aan. 
Je hebt veel meer overzicht een een goed validator. Schuiven doe je met de rechtermuisknop. 
Schuiven met de kaartmet iD  in editmodus levert vaak schade op aan de kaart . Je selecteert, maar ook schuift met de linker muisknop. Zo kun je zaken onbedoeld verplaatsen. 
Inderdaad het gebied van je edits kleiner houden. Het is lastig te zien wat je waar en wat je hebt aangepast.

Eerder uploaden ..uit de editmodus en dan pas schuiven. 

Succces,
Eggie
mrk1 (2021-05-15 14:20:41+00:00): Er staat in de opmerking geen cycleway=lane, zijn fietssuggestiestroken. Maar dit zijn volgens de definitie die volgens mij in Nederland gehanteerd wordt wel een cycleway=lane. Namelijk een rode gemarkeerde strook met fietser er op afgebeeld. Zonder fietser is volgens mij cycleway=shared_lane. Ik pas hem aan. Ik hoor het graag als je denkt dat ik het verkeerd heb.
user_5359 (2020-05-20 05:00:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question to your changeset: Which part of highway=tertiary defintion (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary) is relevant for this street?
---
Outside urban areas, tertiary roads are those with low to moderate traffic which link smaller settlements such as villages or hamlets. For quieter linking roads, consider using highway=unclassified instead. For busier through routes, use highway=secondary or greater instead, although note that outside heavily developed areas there may be no busier sort of road than this. 
...
---
Frans S (2020-05-20 12:07:50+00:00): Hi. See my remarks on another changeset of yesterday
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85462177
Mathi (2021-08-11 09:58:12+00:00): Where did you get the information about the marked trail/route? There are no marks visible.
chachafish (2020-05-20 00:12:28+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. Just so you know, if you tag paths as "shared" (bikes & pedestrians), the OSM wiki says to add the tag segregated=yes or segregated=no. Trails lacking the segregated tag will pop up as errors on QA tools. Please see the link below. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated
mueschel (2020-05-20 09:52:43+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags - there are many 'seamakr' instead of 'seamark' here.
borazslo (2020-05-20 18:18:48+00:00): oooops thank for the feedback
Frans S (2020-05-20 12:05:20+00:00): Hi. See my remarks on changeset 85463803
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85463243
portalaventura (2020-05-20 19:56:11+00:00): crlinux, no OSM não abreviamos os tipos dos logradouros públicos, por exemplo, escrevemos "Avenida" ao invés de "Av.". Se puder corrija as abreviações nas ruas dessa região.
crlinux (2020-05-20 23:08:40+00:00): erro corrigido
portalaventura (2020-05-22 00:48:27+00:00): Agradecido pela pronta resposta.
Mantemos um grupo no Telegram sobre o OSM no RS, se puder participe: https://t.me/osmrs
gscholz (2020-05-21 07:20:58+00:00): Hi opengislab
your recent changesets have added several errors to the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-75.69925&lat=4.80983&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2020-05-26 04:31:33+00:00): Hi opengislab,
this errors still persits. When will you start to fix them?
Guido
Frans S (2020-05-20 12:02:38+00:00): Hello Sophia. Thanks for mapping here
Did you not join the Slack channels to introduce yourself and get your first attempts reviewed?
Please Do and read the pinned documents on the hotmappings channel
Read this to get a good understanding what and how to map in these projects
About your mappings, 
After reading the guidelines you will see what went wrong with your mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85463803
Sophia Perring (2020-05-20 21:15:41+00:00): Hello, I am used to the old system. I apologize, I had not seen the new messages. 
I'm not completely sure what you mean, is it just that I should have filled the list (".OSM userName
2.Project number
3.Task Number
4.Changeset number
Click on your Profile (1.) click settingsb.In the lower left corner click “Changesets history”c.In OSMCha look to the left of screen - Changeset number look like this 5.Imagery used (Bing, Maxar, Facebook AI etc..")
Other than that, perhap I should have classified some of the roads as paths and not tracks?
Frans S (2020-05-21 07:55:59+00:00): Hello Sophia, 
Let me explain the system again
(I've send you a message through Slack as well.
Due to the nature of this country the project team made specific guidelines how and what to map.
These are collected and available in the documents pinned to the Slack Channel.
This is one of the most important docs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
The aim is to made a digital/paper maps network of roads /paths connecting hamlets, villages, towns to be able to get (nav systems) access even to the very remote groups of people. 
We are not interested in tracks leading to farm fields ,woods or rivers. Just roads connecting the community. Very basic. 
About your answer. 
Stop after 4. changeset number and forget the OSMCha website. This is mend to be used by OSM  (semi ) professionals to get grip on vandalism and mappers who consequent made bad mappings. 
Let me know if you have further questions.
Best regards and keep mapping
flohoff (2020-05-20 11:12:29+00:00): Moin,
an diesem Changeset stimmt was nicht. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321903898/history#map=19/51.82174/8.65747

Bisher war auf dem teilstück 50 - Und 30 Mo-Fr 7-17:00

30 @ (Mo-Fr 7:00-17:00)

So ist das in maxspeed:conditional eingetragen.

Du hast jetzt das maxspeed fix auf 30 gesetzt. Entweder muss das conditional weg oder das maxspeed wieder auf 50.

Guck dir das bitte ncohmal an.

Flo
bielebog (2020-11-03 19:41:58+00:00): Hi, wie Flo schon angemerkt hat,
wurde in diesem Changeset das schon korrekt eingetragene zeitliche Tempolimit mit fixem Tempo 30 überschrieben.
Mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93500283 hab ich das eben rückgängig gemacht.
eggie (2020-05-19 21:44:23+00:00): Lijkt me helemaal oke zo.
Gr eggie
bielebog (2020-11-03 19:33:39+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurde das schon korrekt eingetragene zeitliche Tempolimit mit fixem Tempo 30 überschrieben.
Mit 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93499894 hab ich das eben rückgängig gemacht.
Frans S (2020-06-24 12:13:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please be more accurate in mapping and do not collect multiple buildings and map it as 1 building
Also square each building. Don't you use the Building tool in JOSM ?
Best regards
Hola. Gracias por el mapa
Por favor, sea más preciso en la cartografía y no recoja varios edificios y lo cartografíe como un solo edificio.
También cuadrar cada edificio. ¿No usas la herramienta de construcción en el JOSM?
Saludos cordiales.
ovruni (2020-06-24 18:03:41+00:00): Hello, in that edition I have removed several descriptive names[0] of the buildings, these names were "Edificio" ("Building").
For any questions, contact the OpenStreetMap community in Peru: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Regards
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
mueschel (2020-05-21 11:08:06+00:00): Hallo,
was ist denn ein 'swingy'? Meintest du 'springy'?
gscholz (2020-05-21 07:20:53+00:00): Hi opengislab
your recent changesets have added several errors to the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-75.69925&lat=4.80983&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
flohoff (2020-05-20 11:09:51+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich den changeset gerade gesehen habe. Die neuen Gebäude sind alle nicht wirklich Rechtwinkelig. ist das wirklich so? Es gibt auch in ID eine funktion um eingezeichnete Flächen automatisch rechtwinkelig zu machen. Guck da mal nach

Flo
user_10799485 (2020-05-20 11:55:12+00:00): Natürlich sind die Rechtwinkelig. Die Funktion die das automatisch kann. hab ich noch nicht gefunden.
BeKri (2020-05-20 13:01:00+00:00): Menüleiste an der Rechten Seite,
unten Buch mit ?
Tastaturkürzel/ Bearbeitung
Q	Ecken eines Weges/einer Fläche rechtwinklig machen
Viel Spaß und sieht gleich viel besser aus ;-)
user_10799485 (2020-05-20 13:59:49+00:00): Danke BeKri
felipeeugenio (2020-05-20 00:23:54+00:00): Estimado
Qué fuente esta usando para cambiar los caminos? tuve que corregir varios.
TimmyTheCatt (2020-05-20 00:51:48+00:00): Hola,
Uso esta página: https://sitministerial.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=ccc8ce73d80d4b48a4cbce97ff89d74c

Es un visor del mapa del MOP (http://www.mapas.mop.cl/)
felipeeugenio (2020-05-20 13:40:59+00:00): ok, esa es la correcta. entonces ojo con los caminos que fusionaste cerca de entre lagos.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2020-05-20 13:46:21+00:00): Por favor no cambiar los nombres. No necesariamente los caminos se llaman tal como sale escrito en la página del ministerio, para esos efectos usar official_name o alt_name
Carto'Cité (2020-06-04 10:46:10+00:00): Salut LeGohan,
J'ai changé ce chemin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806212819) en highway=path ce qui correspond plus à la pratique. Par contre ce qui serait intéressant serait de préciser le type de revêtement. Je n'arrive pas à le déterminer depuis la photo aérienne, si tu as une info :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
LegGohan (2020-06-04 11:59:33+00:00): OK, merci pour les infos, c'était ma première modif OpenStreetMap et je ne connaissais pas highway=path.
J'ai ajouté le type de revêtement :)
Carto'Cité (2020-06-04 12:13:56+00:00): Super :)
Merci pour ton retour.
Charles
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 16:43:02+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
SekeRob (2020-10-11 13:54:30+00:00): Hi FixFighter

I'm getting a warning in the big error report "Inconsistent tagging of construction". Don't know when the filobus will ride, but apart from seeing a demo version on Piazza Salotto, think Pescara never bought them. The electrical installation is ready as are the traffic signal controls, was briefly powered i saw notices for at 700 volts. Anyway, I've done quite a bit of editing on the full length of the Strada Parco or Parco Strada as described on Facebook, and today also added some filobus tags and made cycle/foot permissive, at least never seen patrolling cops stop anyone. May change in the future off course. 
ciao :O)
gileri (2020-05-20 06:10:54+00:00): Thank your for this cleanup !
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-05-20 09:57:32+00:00): Happy to help, this one was an ideal work for bot (both finding offending objects and modifying them).

BTW, are you potentially interested in reports about wikipedia/wikidata issues where human help is actually needed?

Example reports are at https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ and if you want I can add also Lyon or any other region.
gileri (2020-05-22 08:26:30+00:00): Hi, nice tool !
I already struggle to keep up with osmose [1] reports, but will check out regions I can understand the language such as California. Thank you for the offer anyway ! 

[1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/
trial (2020-06-01 12:40:52+00:00): nice bot!
Binnette (2020-06-05 14:34:52+00:00): Thank you Mateusz ^^
WegefanHB (2020-05-26 19:12:54+00:00): Geht so. Nur das ist WERDER und nicht Wiese.
cbffosler (2020-05-26 20:21:03+00:00): Ja, das ist WERDER an der Spree, nachträglich ändern geht nicht...
diamondarmorsteve (2024-08-16 13:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted since it deleted a boundary relation and several of its former nodes/members. Please be more careful in the future.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155328601
FraukeLeo (2024-02-26 06:20:36+00:00): Hallo, ist der Niemenbach wirklich am Schützenhaus vorbei auf mehrere hundert Meter seiner Länge verrohrt? Mitten im Wald?
SekeRob (2021-01-19 17:28:24+00:00): Hi Finix,

In case you not already have it and you'd like to keep track and correct the problems OSM flags for your change sets, here's the link to your page (click levels 1/2/3 for detail), https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?FinixFighter
This one was easy, if foot/cycle share a path the segregated= yes or no is required. Overall you're looking pretty good. I ony found out when I had an accumulated 1500 errors, so now that's my daily chore, first things first to check out at about 11:30AM

PS We're still top dogs in Abruzzo Italy changesets and somehow think I already shared the link with you.

ciao ciao
FinixFighter (2021-01-20 11:43:58+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out! I'll try to fix all my Osmose errors :)
FinixFighter (2021-01-20 11:50:31+00:00): Does an Osmose issue automatically disappear when the error is fixed? Or do I always need to close them as fixed?
SekeRob (2021-01-20 15:19:15+00:00): You have to hit the tick mark to clear, or X if you firmly believe it's a false positive. I suppose if you fix the error it will disappear off the list tomorrow. If you tick it immediate turns into a red line and upon F5 it's disappeared from the active list.
ciao
SekeRob (2021-01-20 15:22:18+00:00): Ticking it and F5 makes it easy to see the trees from the forest. I ended yesterday with 11, woke up to 16 and 10 minutes later had them resolved, back to 11. I don't worry too much about errors because the report will not fail to tell me when I made one. :O)
FinixFighter (2021-01-20 15:28:36+00:00): Okay thank you! :)
mueschel (2020-05-20 09:54:20+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used a tag here that is not used in any other place 'aifo_is' - could you explain what this mean?

Thanks
Jan
literan (2020-05-20 21:06:55+00:00): Добрый день. Обычно вдоль дворовых проездов тротуары не рисуют (можно отметить на линии проезда тегом sidewalk=right/left/both). Пешеходы имеют преимущество и могут перемещаться по этим проездам везде где хотят. А наличие такие тротуаров приведет к тому, что роутеры будут вести пешеходов вдоль всего дома к месту ближайшего соединения (а по сути они должны быть соединены везде)
joe371 (2020-05-20 21:18:49+00:00): Спасибо за замечание, буду исправлять. Насколько я понимаю, тротуары, отделенные газоном от дворового проезда, можно оставлять?
literan (2020-05-21 06:41:48+00:00): тут не то чтобы можно/неможно (никто ничего не запрещает), а просто здравый смысл :-)

да, логично, что отделенные газоном дорожки (либо пересекающие территорию двора, соединяющие разные дворы или проезды) лучше рисовать.

еще замечу, что не всякая дорожка является тротуаром (тег footway=sidewalk), а только та, что идет вдоль проезжей части
ma-rt-in (2020-05-20 11:11:02+00:00): Hello,
is it really necessary to enter data, as it is not possible to verify anything on site?
Stereo (2020-05-30 21:52:10+00:00): Hello,

I find it interesting, and have been able to verify that information without leaving confinement, so yes :)

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
ma-rt-in (2020-05-31 09:56:22+00:00): I think it's more like you were copying from old maps. Because for an old Roman bridge on the border between Germany and Luxembourg there are no longer any clues on the spot and would therefore not be verifiable on site.
Stereo (2020-06-02 15:45:32+00:00): "Rue des Romains" on one side which is a pretty good clue, plus old books, yeah.
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-23 05:51:43+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85467798
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-23 05:52:33+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
TrueWeast (2020-05-20 00:05:28+00:00): Correct imagery citation for this changeset is Bing Aerial Imagery
gscholz (2020-05-27 04:32:07+00:00): Hi Ferchino,
your recent changeset have created a lot of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways and overlapping ways:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-78.04732&lat=0.57761&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

You obviously also do not know what a "secondary" highway means, please read here::

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Can you please adjust your road type assignments as well as the other errors?
Guido
opendcc (2020-05-20 05:31:13+00:00): Hallo,

Danke für die Mithilfe.
ein kleiner Hinweis (Wolfsbach): wo sich Wege und Straßen kreuzen, muß man entweder Brücke oder Culvert bauen und layer angeben.

Servus Wolfgang
greniac (2020-05-20 14:41:07+00:00): Oh hoppla, kann sein, dass ich das an ein paar Stellen übersehen habe, danke für den Hinweis :D
opendcc (2020-05-20 14:58:09+00:00): Kein Problem. Im Oberlauf habe ich das auf ditch runtergestuft.
gscholz (2020-05-27 04:32:41+00:00): Hi Ferchino,
your recent changeset have created a lot of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways and overlapping ways:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-78.04732&lat=0.57761&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

You obviously also do not know what a "secondary" highway means, please read here::

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Can you please adjust your road type assignments as well as the other errors?
Guido
gscholz (2020-05-27 04:32:59+00:00): Hi Ferchino,
your recent changeset have created a lot of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways and overlapping ways:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-78.04732&lat=0.57761&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

You obviously also do not know what a "secondary" highway means, please read here::

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Can you please adjust your road type assignments as well as the other errors?
Guido
gscholz (2020-05-27 04:33:09+00:00): Hi Ferchino,
your recent changeset have created a lot of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways and overlapping ways:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-78.04732&lat=0.57761&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

You obviously also do not know what a "secondary" highway means, please read here::

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Can you please adjust your road type assignments as well as the other errors?
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-23 05:51:39+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85467238
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-23 05:52:28+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap