piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
Sowa1980 (2021-02-06 18:54:05+00:00): Весь вандализм в Тулуне откатывается!
eggie (2021-02-06 16:40:56+00:00): Hi Cai.. Please your mapping-area..
Greetz
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-02-06 17:51:35+00:00): Hello again ti-lo.
Your comment here "a fool with a tool is still a fool" is unhelpful and makes you look a fool rather than anyone else.
I've never visited the shop in question but it looks from the website https://lbm-shop.de/shop/ to be closer to "clothes" than "motorcycle" (although among the dozen or so clothes categories there are a couple of non-clothes ones).
Can you explain in more detail why you think your mapping is correct and the original mapper here (Muhmaker) is wrong?
Best Regards,
Andy
ti-lo (2021-02-06 18:08:23+00:00): Hi Andy, seems I didn't have a look for the "original" in this case. The "fool" was referred to a bunch of changes that adamant did to hundreds of motorcycle stores and I recently corrected. The fact is that most of those are mainly seen as a motorcycle shop (as this is the "theme"). If you look at a dozen or so which are still on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=motorcycle (check by whom) you will figure out that the majority sees it like this. The current one is a real exception for this.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-06 22:05:24+00:00): Funnily enough the first one of those that I checked (based on proximit to me) was http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=208276666 - The original 2014 and current tagging there is I believe correct based on the shop in question (never been in but been past it lots of times), and your attempted changes weren't.
Adamant1 (2021-02-15 06:09:55+00:00): RTFM, if the majority of mappers prefer motorcycle:clothes=yes as you claim, then how come 99% of motorcycle shops that sell clothes were tagged as clothes=yes or clothes=motorcycle before you did a mass edit to them in 2017 and 2/3 or more of the current motorcycle:clothes=yes usage is still only from your mass editing? You can't seriously say its the way the majority of people prefer to tag things when your the one that did the mass edit to boast the tags usage at the expense of gutting the other tags that had way more usage then motorcycle:clothes before you screwed with them. Especially since usage of motorcycle:clothes by anyone accept you has been almost non-existent since then. 4 years later and your still really the only one advocating for or using these types of tags, and the only reason any of them have any usage at all is because of your original mass edits to them.
ti-lo (2021-02-15 11:30:13+00:00): The problem is that you mass edited motorcycle shops to clothes shops (and additionally removed information by using your "simple" way of tagging). The motorcycle prefix doesn't hurt anyone but makes it clear what is meant, while your info removal is destructive
Ropino (2021-03-23 19:41:15+00:00): Hallo 0tten24,
Welche Grundlage haben deine 'leichteren Korrekturen am gelände' - insbesondere wenn Grenzen verschoben wurden und jetzt diverse Postcode-Grenzen defekt/inkorrekt sind?
Ein paar Grenzen habe ich schon wieder korrigiert.
Ropino (2021-03-23 19:46:36+00:00): Jetzt war ich zu schnell mit 'senden'.
---
Bitte schreibe auch etwas genauere Kommentare. 
mehrere hundert identischer (nichtsagende) Kommentare sind wenig hilfreich.

VG Ropino
tomhukins (2021-03-11 20:47:09+00:00): The name of "b" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904464087 looks like a mistake
dudone (2021-03-18 18:35:44+00:00): Removed.
Thanks
Dudley
user_5359 (2021-02-07 04:43:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box. https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:surface
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-06 17:22:41+00:00): Thanks! 
Interestingly, since my address tool auto-completed the city name, that indicated that there were even more POIs misspelled. Found further two :-)
InsertUser (2021-02-08 19:33:24+00:00): Hello, have you visited this? The causeway looks like it may have been washed out in a few places in the imagery.
sorcrosc (2021-02-07 02:20:17+00:00): Ciao. Scusa l'intrusione ma ho notato che ti capita spesso di fare modifiche su aree molto grandi, saltando da un luogo all'altro. Questo è piuttosto noioso per che vuole analizzare le modifiche. Per favore cerca di caricare più spesso.

Grazie
Lorenzo
InsertUser (2021-02-08 19:30:13+00:00): Hello. Have you visited this? The satellite imagery looks like it might be `man_made=quay`. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dquay
seattlefyi (2021-02-06 20:06:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for fixing those addresses! I went ahead and expanded out a couple of the street name abbreviations even further (like SE to Southeast) which appears to be an OSM convention (that you probably already know about, couldn't hurt to mention my additions). Thanks again!
Julian S (2021-02-06 23:22:36+00:00): Ah yes indeed, thanks for making the street name even better!

P.S. There are a bunch of other addresses with similar looking data issues around. I'm thinking of making a couple MapRoulette challenges for them, but in the meantime, here's an overpass query :) https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/13iy
datamongers (2021-04-12 13:05:51+00:00): Please remember when adding elevations in OSM they are always in meters, not feet.
olo81 (2021-02-06 20:15:38+00:00): "całkowicie zarośnięty obszar lotnych piasków ( ok. 1 km² )." za wikipedią. 

Czyli to była pustynia. 
 Trzeba to inaczej otagować.  Kolejne pytanie skąd lokalizacja i dlaczego akurat taki teren a nie mniejszy czy większy. 
Pamiętaj że dodajemy to co jest w terenie a nie historyczne miejsca.
C2oc4 (2021-02-08 10:37:48+00:00): Dodałem teren faktyczny :) tzn jest on ale tak plus minus takiej wielkości byłem tam na spacerze piasek jest jak coś i na necie tez masz opis na wikipedi
olo81 (2021-02-08 18:57:00+00:00): Zmieniłem na punkt. 
Las to nie piasek czy pustynia. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8405978267
C2oc4 (2021-02-09 12:03:47+00:00): No Oki
4004 (2021-03-29 00:30:04+00:00): addr:flats наугад? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101789132
matsumi (2021-04-04 16:10:46+00:00): По факту получилось, что так. Хотя система подсчёта количества квартир простая и правильная, недосмотрел количество этажей в секциях.
kartler175 (2021-02-07 10:56:07+00:00): Bitte überprüfe deine Arbeitsweise beim editieren, diese Anhäufung des gleichen Fehlers ist schon sehr auffällig: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.05888&lat=51.17579&zoom=14&opacity=0.95
itineris (2021-02-08 10:45:23+00:00): Szia!

Egy teljes kört rajzoltál be földutakból Bükkábrány - Tard - Tibolddaróc között. Kérlek, meglevő utak tetejére ne vigyél be duplán, inkább csatlakozz bele az új szakasszal, és folytasd, ahol újra kiágazol belőle!

Amúgy is célszerű kisebb darabokban dolgozni, és pl. elágazásoknál, kereszteződéseknél megbontatni egy vonalat.

Üdv:
Ákos
olo81 (2021-02-06 20:33:20+00:00): "Przedsiębiorstwo Komunalne Ogrodzieniec Sp. z o.o. " do osobnego tagu "operator"
C2oc4 (2021-02-08 10:39:22+00:00): W sumie to się to tak nazywa Jak wpisana Przedsiębiorstwo Komunalne Ogrodzieniec Sp. z o.o. - ujęcie wody
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-07 09:13:52+00:00): Hello Fedekicco,

I just saw your edit. "Val" is a pretty generic name. Is this the actual name or just a generic one? If it is a generic one, the name should be removed, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names.

Thank you for contributing to OSM!

Cheers
Ze0zohk1
bxl-forever (2021-02-07 21:04:25+00:00): Hello,
I don't know if you have the possibility to survey how the speed changes along the A12, but I would not trust Mobigis too much.  My own experience upon surveying all the streets that would get 50-kph roadsigns as from January showed there are lots of discrepancies between what Mobigis thinks and ground truth.
JuanjoMC (2021-02-08 17:03:31+00:00): Hi,

while I pass by there quite often, it's true that I didn't in 2021 yet (working from home, my car is sleeping most of the time ;-), so it may be that the situation has changed.

From what I remember, there aren't any speed signs direction Antwerp, so I assume 120 kph. 
Direction Brussels there is a 70 kph limit just after the exit going to Gros Tilleul and some signs along this same exit going from 90 to 70 kph if I remember well.

I will have a look next time I pass by there and post here.

Cheers
JuanjoMC (2021-02-13 19:02:16+00:00): Hi,

I passed by there this morning. 

As I said, direction Antwerp there are no maxspeed signs.

Direction Brussels there is a 90kph sign a few hundred meters before the 70 kph one. I was thinking that it applied to the link going to Gros Tilleul but no, it applies to the motorway.

Corrected it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99225963#map=16/50.8980/4.3507

Cheers
bxl-forever (2021-02-13 19:23:46+00:00): OK, thanks.  Well done!
czubi (2021-02-08 13:44:32+00:00): Jetzt habe ich es zum dritten mal weggemacht und du machst es immer wieder hin. Jetzt wird es langsam ärgerlich.der name steht schon am Umriss der Fläche und childcare gibt es NICHT. Addr:street gibts auch NICHT
itze79 (2021-02-08 17:08:04+00:00): Sorry, hab vom gesamten Ort nen Lageplan als png gebraucht und da sieht 3 mal „AWO Kinderkrippe Schwalnennest“ einfach nicht gut aus! Ich bin fertig und hab alles was ich brauche! Ganz logisch ist es mir trotzdem nicht!
Schau mal bitte nach Angelhausen! Der gleiche Aufbau und da steht einmal „ AWO Kneipp-Kita "Angelhäuser Spatzen". Ich werde es jetzt nicht mehr ändern!
czubi (2021-02-08 17:31:52+00:00): Es ist klar das es immer wieder neu auftaucht.
Du hast es am 1.2 drangemacht, ich am 4.2. wieder weg, du am 6.2. wieder hin, ich am 8.2. wieder weg.
Wenn du willst das es nur 1x auftaucht WARUM MACHST DU ES DANN 3x WIEDER HIN ? UND DANN NOCH FALSCH? Hier ist die Historie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8384796726/history
pio2_122 (2021-02-06 19:30:53+00:00): Proszę, nie dodawaj tagów typu access=yes, bicycle=yes, itp. Jest to domyślna wartość i nie trzeba tego dodatkowo dodawać. Natomiast w przypadku wartości „no” w tagu dostępu musi być to oparte na oznakowaniu w terenie.
Malcolm Binns (2021-02-07 22:19:48+00:00): Need to add a bridge over the disused railway (labelled Wycombe). Not sure how....  Bridleway goes over railway
SomeoneElse (2021-02-06 19:10:43+00:00): I made my change based on another mapper's comments on your edit at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97610951 .  It is not OK to simply ignore communication (for 20 days in the case of comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97610951 ) and then just change data back to your preferred values.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
MxxCon (2021-02-06 19:58:56+00:00): "okd_name" tag? I don't see any reference to it on wiki
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98824511
jmapb (2021-02-06 21:24:39+00:00): fat-fingered typo for "old_name", good catch, fixed now
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:55:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
M!dgard (2021-02-07 12:55:03+00:00): Kun je het gebouw bij Polderlaan 26 terug corrigeren a.u.b?
Kun je de gebouwen in de P. Krügerstraat terugzetten naar de correcte versie a.u.b.?

Voor de rest is het ook niet per se nodig om nog verder in Blankenberge te mappen, ik doe daar rustig verder aan de GRB-import wanneer het mij uitkomt, dikwijls aangevuld met plaatsbezoeken.
M!dgard (2021-02-07 13:01:03+00:00): Ik wil ook even opmerken dat het overnemen van GRB (zelfs traceren van hun basiskaart) voor zover ik weet een import inhoudt, en dus onderworpen is aan de importregels. In het kader van de mainstream import hebben we daar toelating voor. Ik heb jouw verzoek op de mailinglist niet zien passeren?
M!dgard (2021-02-07 13:07:03+00:00): Ik waardeer wel dat je nog zorg draagt voor de coherentie van de kaart, wat niet van iedereen gezegd kan worden.
M!dgard (2021-03-08 18:34:24+00:00): Foute straatnaam ingevoerd op https://osm.org/way/29324200 teruggedraaid in https://osm.org/changeset/100656251
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:55:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
PatrickEk (2021-02-07 19:38:24+00:00): Sorry mijn fout, had het me gister nog bedacht dat ik niet aan de fietsrelatie had gedacht! Bedankt voor het herstellen, anders had ik het vandaag zelf gedaan.
iriman (2021-02-08 12:44:12+00:00): سلام. به اوپن‌استریت‌مپ خوش آمدید.

دوسه نکته دربارهٔ این ویرایش به نظرم آمد خدمتتون عرض کنم:

- در این ویرایش مرز شهر دزفول و مرز بخش مرکزی باز مانده و مشکل دارد. ویرایشگر آی‌دی در نوار کنار صفحه هشدارهایی می‌دهد که می‌توانید با توجه به آن‌ها این دست مشکلات را بلافاصله که رخ می‌دهد، متوجه شوید.

- یک معبر کوتاه در این ویرایش حذف شده که به‌خاطر ظاهر نافرمش احتمالا تصور کردید زائد است. اما در واقع یکی از گره‌های این معبر در اثر ویرایش قبلی‌تون کشیده شده بود و متوجه نشدید. البته پیش می‌آید و این را هم با توجه به هشدارهای ویرایشگر می‌توانید پیشگیری کنید.

- همچنین بهتر است منبع ویرایش را دقیق‌تر و با ذکر تاریخ یا حتی بهتر با ذکر نشانی اینترنتی اعلام نمایید. این کار از ابهام سایر ویرایشگران کم می‌کند و اگر وقت داشته باشند با توجه به منبع اعلامی، ایرادات احتمالی را برطرف می‌کنند.

موفق باشید
pio2_122 (2021-02-06 19:40:11+00:00): Do dodawania budynków polecam stronę https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl/ - która oferuje gotowe obrysy do pobrania. 
Instrukcję obsługi można znaleźć tu: https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl/help.html
Drobna uwaga: aby pobrać tylko budynki z tej strony należy kliknąć na strzałkę przy przycisku „Pobierz dane dla JOSM” -> „Pobierz tylko budynki”.

Adresy w tej okolicy staram się aktualizować na bieżąco, a dodatkowo na tej stronie występują czasami nieaktualne, błędne bądź zdublowane adresy - więc chyba nie ma sensu dublować tej pracy :D
muralito (2021-07-03 17:01:24+00:00): Hola. Lo malo es que salta en el validador del JOSM que la relacion no tiene tipo...
muralito (2021-07-03 17:03:07+00:00): capaz que en vez de disused:type es mejor como type=disused:route pero no lo tengo claro...
mweper (2021-07-06 11:44:07+00:00): Hola Muralito. Por lo que tengo entendido las etiquetas de ciclo de vida irían en la etiqueta izquierda (no se como se llama).

En todo caso, creo que se podría poner type=route + route=disused + disused:route=bus pero creo que también saltaría el error en el validador.
muralito (2021-07-08 01:14:51+00:00): Se llama "clave".
Los términos en OSM son key=value, traducidos como clave=valor.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Etiquetas
user_5359 (2022-04-07 05:13:23+00:00): If this bus route no longer exists, then the type of the relation should not be set to disused (because the entered route remains a route). It would make more sense to delete the relation or (for documentation purposes) to set the descriptive elements to disused.

Si esta ruta de autobús ya no existe, el tipo de la relación no debe establecerse en desuso (porque la ruta introducida sigue siendo una ruta). Tendría más sentido eliminar la relación o (a efectos de documentación) poner los elementos descriptivos en desuso.
mweper (2022-04-07 12:13:59+00:00): - Trataré de mejorar el etiquetado de ciclo de vida para que no moleste en los validadores, pero necesitaría ayuda en acordar tal normalización al respecto.
- En principio, esta "adecuación del transporte" tenía vigencia durante la declaración de emergencia del transporte, la cual se extendía por dos años, quedando concluida en caso de que los pasajeros totales mensuales alcancen el 90% de las personas trasladadas en octubre 2019.
- Por eso mi objetivo no era borrar las relaciones, si después tenía que volver a crearlas. Son muchas y lleva tiempo (que no tengo) crear este tipo de relaciones con cada parada.
- Mi objetivo fue de ponerlas temporalmente en desuso para cuando se vuelvan a recomponer, solo haga falta cambiar la etiqueta. Algunas líneas ya volvieron a la normalidad, por lo que borré la relación creada temporalmente y actualicé el estado de la relaciones originales.

Fuentes:
- https://www.rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/293131
- http://emr.gov.ar/info_tup.php
- https://comollego.rosario.gob.ar/lineas
user_5359 (2022-04-08 05:09:52+00:00): I think I understand what your motives are. But it is also a question of what your evaluation routine is looking for. Assumption: It only searches for type=route. Then disused:type=route is correct for the evaluation, but wrong for OSM, because the relation has no classification with type. It would be better if the evaluation routine does not only search for type=route but also excludes all that have a disused=yes as tag.

Creo que entiendo cuáles son sus motivos. Pero también es una cuestión de lo que busca su rutina de evaluación. Supuesto: Sólo busca el tipo=ruta. Entonces disused:type=route es correcto para la evaluación, pero erróneo para OSM, porque la relación no tiene clasificación con el tipo. Sería mejor si la rutina de evaluación no sólo buscara el tipo=ruta, sino que también excluyera todos los que tienen una etiqueta disused=yes.

(traducido automáticamente)
Warin61 (2021-02-07 07:36:40+00:00): Hi,
Mulitipolygon 12283410 (farm land) is incorrect. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.44414&lat=-35.29603&zoom=15

For simple multipolygons -
draw one outer way - no connections to the inner/s. 
draw the inner/s - no connection to the outer. 

So there are now 2 or more separate ways. Now include these in the multipolygon relation - the outer has the role 'outer' and the inner/s have the role/s 'inner'. 

Note - in this area of the world the DCS imagery has more resolution. And you will find the DCS Base Map has a lot of information.
Supaplex (2021-02-07 02:19:33+00:00): 請問你資料來源是那邊來的？如果是用業者的店家清單上的地址，用 Google、國土測繪中心的 geocoder 的話應該是不行的。目前應該是沒有 geocoder 符合授權的。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98825499
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 04:34:24+00:00): 這些資料只是描述基本營業資訊，例如分店名稱、地址、營業時間等單純事實性資料，不具備著作權之原創性，而且著作權範圍只及於著作的表達，不包括當中的概念，不然事實上幾乎所有的OSM資料，在Google、國土測繪中心與業者的店家清單中也都有同樣的資訊，而相同的歷史事實、概念及思想，各自以不同表達方式創作都是可以的，例如不同的地圖製作商，用相同的地理資料創作不同表達形式的地圖，例如各自不同版本的台灣地圖，也都是可以的
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 04:42:09+00:00): 此情形與其他地圖商畫出台灣的輪廓、標示出城市鄉鎮的名稱與位置、繪製出景點、建築物、商家與公共設施，乃基於同樣的地理事實，是相同的
Supaplex (2021-02-07 06:56:37+00:00): 你可能要注意一下有牽涉到資料庫權利的保護這一塊，不是每一個司法管轄區都視事實而不受到保護，像是過往台灣的數位典藏計劃就有主張掃描的東西有著作權。所以問題的根源會在，你是否拿一份清單在做件事情。如果你是一個一個實地探察，或是跟該連鎖體系的人取得同意，那沒問題。我假定這些資料集是沒有帶經緯度的，那你用的 geocoder 廠商也可能主張權利，或是寫在他的使用條款，禁止你用它的成果到其他地方。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98825499
Supaplex (2021-02-07 07:03:17+00:00): 之所以要特別注重授權，是因為貢獻資料到 OSM 上，資料權利讓渡給位於英國的 OSM 基金會，不能讓他們會被告損害其他廠商權利。所以會對於資料的來源，資料的產生方式是否能相容 ODbL，而 OpenStreetMap 是相當嚴格的。如果你無法說明資料來源、產生方式合乎既有的授權條款，被質疑是相當正常的，更何況你一次編輯的量太大，很難一一去檢核。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98825499
Supaplex (2021-02-07 07:13:35+00:00): 根據 OSMcha 的統計，你總共新增 1766 個物件，不是你聲稱的單純整理資料，這部分就得請你說明了，不然經過社群討論，需要把不相容授權的資料移除。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98825499
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 07:58:12+00:00): 如果我是以其他的方法，例如一個一個實地探察，也是會得到相同的結果，輪子不需要重新發明一次，這類事實性資料很難有"用自己的文字來重新描寫，或者自己拍攝原物圖片"的空間。文章可以用自己的文字來重新描寫，圖片可以自己拍攝或繪製，但是分店名稱、地址、營業時間，就只有這樣的敘述，無論是用什麼方式，結果都是相同的，不然就是不實竄改了
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:08:18+00:00): 我引用的資料庫權利均屬於事實紀錄(分店名稱、地址、營業時間等)，並沒有著作的原創性，原則上不是著作權的客體，除非有另外以智慧或技藝或創意來做創作，才算是具有原創性，而成為著作權的客體

"不過，常見的電子資料庫，其內容大多只是一些事實紀錄的資料，例如中正國際機場所有航空公司每週航班的起降時間資料，台北市數位學習業者的公司名稱、地址、電話號碼及網址等，職棒各球隊的比賽紀錄或球員的歷年打擊成績、個人獎項、特殊紀錄等相關資料，由於上述資料本身並非屬於以人類之智慧或技藝所創造完成的作品，因此不是一項「創作」，便不屬於著作權法上「著作」的範疇，故不適用著作權法之相關規定。"

https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2700/News_Content.aspx?n=7E7998229FF536D6&sms=B18822F8EE723D8E&s=8593B5DFBDDBDF79
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:12:04+00:00): "過往台灣的數位典藏計劃就有主張掃描的東西有著作權。"

這要看這是不是有原創性的著作，跟單純引用事實性的資料是不同的，

例如單純引用分店名稱、地址、營業時間的事實性資料，就沒有著作權的問題，

但如果我copy評論某店家的部落格的內容，這就會侵犯著作權，因為這具有原創性
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:16:04+00:00): JOSM允許離線編輯，因此可以事先花幾周到幾個月的時間編輯，然後一次上傳發布

"根據 OSMcha 的統計，你總共新增 1766 個物件，不是你聲稱的單純整理資料，這部分就得請你說明了，不然經過社群討論，需要把不相容授權的資料移除。"
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:19:47+00:00): 荷蘭甚至連每一棟房屋的外型、地址都發佈出來
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:26:40+00:00): 如果依照Supaplex的邏輯，OSM幾乎沒有什麼資料可以保留，因為幾乎所有的資料，在不相容授權的來源中，都有完全相同的內容，這也包括其他人在OSM上的編輯
cmi3j89d9o (2021-02-07 08:50:23+00:00): 因為我無從得知其他編輯者是如何得到他們的資料，因此無從判定有沒有用到不相容授權的資料，而幾乎所有的地理資訊，不相容授權的資料也有相同的內容，按照Supaplex的邏輯，都可以假定為來自不相容授權來源中的內容，而由於這些資料只是事實紀錄，因此不論我用什麼方式，得到的結果都相同，例如分店名稱、地址、營業時間等。如果有不同的情形，就表示有一方是錯誤、過時或虛假的
tomhukins (2021-08-06 13:19:17+00:00): I notice that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124110233 has both "access=private" and "designation=public_footpath" on it.  Having walked near here, I don't think it's a public footpath.
dudone (2021-08-06 18:18:23+00:00): Thank you for letting me know about this.

Looking at the history I'm not sure I added this tag but I have added others since and should have noted this.  It's not a footpath as far as I am aware so I have remove this tag.

Dudley
tomhukins (2021-08-08 17:52:58+00:00): Good point: I didn't check the way's history carefully enough.  Thank you for fixing the tags.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-07 17:02:19+00:00): Hi. You added the tag roundtrip=yes to this relation, but this route is not circular (i.e. from and to location are not the same). Please remove. BR, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98825729
ALu68 (2021-02-07 13:29:57+00:00): Hello anuj96,

Wellcome to OSM.

Please have a look at the wiki for the available keys & tags for a petrol station: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

What means Petrol Pump = yes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904505610#map=19/21.15086/79.10244
Please update.

Regards. Andre
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 23:53:14+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12283431

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
4004 (2021-02-08 00:56:33+00:00): nice https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=16/53.6558/23.8460&categories=buildings-start_date
MxxCon (2021-02-06 20:17:59+00:00): Hello.
There are a couple of issues with your edit.
The largest is that you tagged this whole building as a resultant, which is incorrect. It seems like there's another restaurant in that building and 2 residential floors above it. As such, this restaurant should be mapped as a separate single POI node and positioned inside the building, approximately close to where the entrance is.
Other issues is that the phone number must include country and area codes.
And finally, the website address must include protocol, http:// or https://.
If you have any questions how to change these things or anything else, feel free to ask. 👍