piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:01:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377928

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
zzptichka (2019-03-05 14:43:15+00:00): Do you mind not deleting an actual existing-on-the-ground disused rail tracks in favor of a proposed railway that is still 5+ years away and that might not even be funded? At least until the tracks are ripped out?
Please re-map it. 
Thanks.
Rps333 (2019-03-05 15:13:54+00:00): +1
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67807004
LogicalViolinist (2019-03-05 15:23:29+00:00): Please revert your deletions immediately and STOP deleting disused tracks
viloan (2019-03-05 14:27:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-03-12 22:51:38+00:00): Você dividiu algumas ruas nesta edição, como a Rua João Pessoa. Isso esta certo? Elas ficam desconectadas assim?
Vitor Silvolí (2019-03-12 23:23:32+00:00): Opa, oi Erick
Então, não deveriam estar desconectadas. Entretanto foi realizada a ruptura de duas vias para fazer a macrodrenagem de um córrego que estava com as tubulações subterrânea sobrecarregadas e entupidas, alagando algumas quadras. Só que a obra travou faz dois meses, e as ruas ainda estão desconectadas.
Editei o mapa para demonstrar a situação real, porquê alguns serviços de localização utilizam o OSM como mapa base, e por precaução preferi mostrar a situação atual.
Entretanto, tão logo sejam ligadas as partes novamente, irei fazer a edição no mapa.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-03-12 23:25:16+00:00): ah ótimo, só queria me certificar. obrigado.
eggie (2019-03-05 15:47:40+00:00): Dag DeKemp..  In principe taggen we bedrijven in OSM bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet op de "buildingshape". 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-05 15:53:19+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst. 
Gr Eggie
gileri (2019-03-27 22:41:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Si les travaux sont suffisemment courts, pas forcément besoin de l'indiquer sur OSM : la plupart des applications ne se mettent à jour qu'occasionnellement; le début ou la fin des travaux risque d'être décalé de plusieurs jours/semaines.

Si les travaux sont long c'est une bonne idée de les mapper. Mais là en l'état les applications style GPS ne sauront pas que la route est bloquée. Le mieux est de mettre les tags access=no, note="Travaux jusqu'à ..." (ou fixme en remplacement de note), et éventuellement de mettre un tag barrier=* approprié s'il y a des barrières physiques empêchant la circulation.
Skwaloo (2019-04-03 12:09:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vous remercie beaucoup pour toutes ces infos. Je débute et j'ai plein de choses à découvrir.
gileri (2019-04-03 22:45:56+00:00): Pas de soucis, on a tous débuté et il ne faut jamais s'arrêter d'apprendre :)
literan (2019-03-15 10:15:13+00:00): зачем вы перенесли точку типографии в лесной массив https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67808652?aoi=e53f863a-3d3b-4dd3-937b-81df6efe1223 ? откачу.
IDKS (2019-03-06 16:37:57+00:00): Please check the street naming guidelines - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#.D0.98.D0.BC.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D0.B8_.D0.B8_.D0.B1.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.80.D0.B4.D0.B8

Thank you!
Jakka (2019-03-06 07:55:35+00:00): zelfde ingevoerd... éénmaal op een gebouw en dan nog eens ernaast ? graag een aanpassing.
Krteček (2019-12-01 17:24:22+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurde die Beschreibung des Multipolygons (landuse=forest) geändert.
description=
alt: "Wälder in der Sachsische Schweiz"
neu: "Verbindung Försters Loch - Gehackter Weg"
Ist die neue description wirklich so beabsichtigt? Die Aussagekraft ist für mich als halbwegs Ortskundigen sehr gering (die alte war deutlich höher).
MrMoehritz (2019-03-05 19:13:55+00:00): Hi Tsamzone,
ich bin mir immer noch unsicher ob du neu bist oder nur dein account :-)
Frage: Wäre nicht z.B. landuse=grass besser geeignet? Die Fläche wird noch sicher gemäht und selten beweidet.
Oder vllt ein anderer Tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=grassland?uselang=de
Besten Gruß und viel Spaß beim Mappen!
MrMoehritz (2019-03-05 19:14:38+00:00): *doch (nicht noch sicher)
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-05 15:29:33+00:00): Thanks for helping with that... We'll never see the end of those damn buildings !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67809167
Martin Borsje (2019-03-15 23:06:59+00:00): Het gebied heet daar Frontenpark; hoe kom je aan de naam Frontenkwartier voor wat geen woonwijk is?
Twotert (2019-03-16 07:35:01+00:00): local knowledge, Gemeente Maastricht, CBS.
In deze buurten wonen ongeveer 420 mensen, dit betreft de rechterzijde Pastoor Habetsstraat, linkerzijde Statensingel en paar adressen op de Cabergerweg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674682244#map=16/50.8569/5.6856
literan (2019-03-15 10:18:50+00:00): вы зачем-то из одного корректно нарисованного здания, с выделенными частями, сделали два с одинаковым адресом. Откатил ваши правки, они полностью некорректные. Если интересно, вот картинка ,как правильно рисовать здания: https://s37vla.storage.yandex.net/rdisk/0a6201f7d2808e9ba6a1cc5fe0fe77092b402a598a4539ebe52ea7f0a892b985/5c8b7e5d/EP01UkWtDIuPnm835i-Tz8HvPREOGRP7wrxEBGs-bZt31zIFLCWSBHxwB85EaRZEq_J6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag==?uid=0&filename=%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B6-2014.jpg&disposition=inline&hash=&limit=0&content_type=inline&tknv=v2&rtoken=gvFJSUPRbJfC&force_default=no&ycrid=na-16360e3b67756aebe030c28e2b663a97-downloader8h&ts=5841f80e69140&s=5807d51aa2d1497138c58c05093529508f010e726a6e680e6dcd83d6850b539b&pb=U2FsdGVkX1_lYk_1TgPdF-y2eYkH704RXy4D5WvHiGBC8oRWKqHWIoNKk2kigfFK0yuHo6GwyEOkMus7rYtplQ
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-05 16:17:09+00:00): Tu peux même préciser building=mosque - un peu redondant certes, mais on peut imaginer un jour un rendu 3D spécifique pour les mosquées...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67809981
Martin Borsje (2019-03-15 23:05:47+00:00): Zelfde opmerking voor Maastricht Noordwest; dit is geen wijknaam.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-05 16:18:01+00:00): Pour ce genre d'installation, en l'absence de gradins je préfère sports_center plutôt que stadium
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67810536
zaizone (2019-06-10 18:10:59+00:00): Je viens de faire un tour sur le wiki, et maintenant je comprends mieux la nuance entre les deux éléments, l'importance de la présence de gradins pour les stades... Merci
Dimacn (2019-03-06 18:22:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не используйте описательные названия в теге name. В name заносим только официальные названия, а подробности отмечаются специальными тегами. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Martin Borsje (2019-03-15 23:04:59+00:00): Timo,

Hoe kom je aan deze wijknamen? Maastricht Zuidwest bijvoorbeeld is waar jij het getekend hebt geen enkele officieel en officieus gebruikte naam.
Twotert (2019-03-16 07:38:47+00:00): Gemeente Maastricht, CBS
Martin Borsje (2019-03-16 07:54:05+00:00): Met alle respect, maar ik ben van mening dat niemand deze 'wijk' als Maastricht Zuidwest ziet.
De CBS indeling is wat anders dan de toegepaste naam. Ik zou hier eerder spreken van de zuidkant van Sint Pieter - wat wel een gebezigde wijknaam is.

De CBS indeling van wijken en buurten is voor statistische doeleinden om (nagenoeg) alle woningen en bewoners van Nederland te omvatten en kan daarmee zeer afwijken van werkelijke buurtnamen en min of meer kunstmatig zijn. Dit betekent dat sommige 'buurten' of reepjes huizen gewoonweg geen buurtnaam hebben. Ik woon bijvoorbeeld in een deel van een dorp zonder buurt- of wijknaam. 
Ik denk dat het rücksichtloos importeren van CBS-namen de werkelijkheid geweld aandoet en je net zou moeten doen.
Denk hier eens serieus over na en probeer ook eens andere bronnen voor (het ontbreken van) wijknamen te zoeken, want dit klopt niet.

Martin
ChehrehBargi (2019-05-11 19:36:20+00:00): برای ایستگاه های خطوط واحد از تگ bus_stop در زیرگروه استفاده می شود. تگی که استفاده کرده اید برای ترمینال هست.
atcomapper (2019-03-05 17:45:42+00:00): Hvis du flytter på et adressepunkt, bliver det automatisk flyttet tilbage igen. Alle adresser i Danmark er nemlig importeret fra Danmarks Adresseregister (DAR). Hvis du mener en andresse er fejlplaceret, skal du kontakte den lokale kommune, som kan rette fejlen i DAR.
Stevie Kørvell (2019-03-05 18:58:01+00:00): Tak - det havde jeg nok også på fornemmelse - at det ikke var så let ;) Jeg prøver at kontakte kommunen, for vi vil gerne have rettet punktet da vi har bygget en del om og ændret hovedadgangsvej.
Niquarl (2025-07-12 06:29:15+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous avez crée cette attraction, il me semble que le osm.org/node/7243098585 est suffisant
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-05 17:05:24+00:00): "name=mosquée" est incorrect: la combinaison amenity=place_of_worship + religion=muslim nous indique déjà que c'est une mosquée et "Mosquée" n'est pas son nom
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67812271
zaizone (2019-06-10 17:58:56+00:00): Merci, corrigé !
eggie (2019-03-05 17:10:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je vervangt alle landuse= * door Leisure=park. 
Dat is dus niet de bedoeling. 
Leisure=park ligt als een transparante deken over alle andere landuse=* heen. 
Leisure=park geeft dus de functie weer. 
Landuse=* is wat je ziet op de grond. 
Park edits liggen bij OSM onder een vergrootglas: vaak wordt iets ten onrechte gewijzigd om zo het spel PokomonGo te kunnen beïnvloeden. 
Dat wordt gezien als vernieling van de kaart en dus worden je changesets ongedaan gemaakt. 
Als je vragen hebt, stel ze dan gerust

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-05 17:12:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #67813763
eggie (2019-03-05 17:25:22+00:00): Caitlin,
Je zou de naam evt.  kunnen toevoegen aan de leisure=park indien het een naam heeft. 
MVG,
Eggie
Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers (2019-03-08 10:02:11+00:00): Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7TtThScAJGPbFJmRXBYaHV0NnBQajVVcWk3ckNJNXMtb2JF/view?usp=sharing
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-03-06 00:35:35+00:00): Hi. I added those roads, I suggest this must be handled by tagging the roads as proposed until actual construction, instead of deleting them. I am requesting this to be reverted, provided they are clearly tagged as proposed.
seav (2019-03-06 03:22:10+00:00): The nodes and ways are actually still in the database but marked as visible=no (in the user interface, they are labeled as "deleted" but they are not actually deleted).

Once the other construction phases have been started, we can then "undelete" them. The advantage of this is that these ways do not interfere with existing data and newbies using iD do not accidentally connect other stuff like buildings and POIs to these proposed roads.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-03-06 04:34:26+00:00): I agree, but I see some problems with the edit, like tagging the flyover section over SLEX and Skyway as a trunk. It is rather an expressway, which we tag as motorway.
seav (2019-03-06 04:53:34+00:00): If you visit the site and what is actually being constructed, it is currently just a flyover (and not a viaduct) over SLEX connecting C-5 and C-5 extension. Since both C-5 and C-5 Extension are currently not motorways, tagging this short flyover as a potential motorway is inaccurate.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-03-06 00:37:03+00:00): As the same with the related edit before, this must be better tagged as a proposed rather than deleting them.
seav (2019-03-06 03:22:34+00:00): See my reply to the other changeset.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-04-15 12:48:34+00:00): Nesse changeset voce deletou umas vias em João Amaro, tive que recria-las agora, por que fez isso? A via era essa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792149107
Sua edição foi essa: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67813006
viloan (2019-03-05 16:52:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gormo (2019-03-08 10:55:20+00:00): Hallo! Danke für Deine Beiträge zu OSM!
Könntest Du allerdings bitte aussagekräftige Kommentare zu deinen Änderungssätzen schreiben? Das macht es für alle Anderen leichter, nachzuvollziehen was Du machst.
Danke, gormo
HansWürstchen (2019-03-23 15:45:01+00:00): Hallo,
ich werd es mal versuchen...
Colin Smale (2019-03-05 19:39:41+00:00): Hi, 
May I enquire what your source is for this detailed LEZ boundary information? I notice it frequently deviates from the OS Boundary-Line alignment, just wondering which is more accurate. 
I notice you leave the source of the boundary ways as OS Boundary Line when you do a "replace geometry" in JOSM. This is of course misleading as the alignment no longer corresponds to OSBL. It would be better to update it to reflect your source.
ika-chan! (2019-03-05 20:45:54+00:00): I am sorry about that. I will get onto it in the next changeset. I will say it is Bing, based on the OSBL.
Colin Smale (2019-03-05 20:53:53+00:00): I think it would be better (and less work for you!) if you leave the OSBL boundaries in place. They are based on accurately surveyed lat/lon positions. Note that admin boundaries are a matter of law and don't move without an act of parliament or similar. What you have done is actually ruined the accurate boundary that was there before. Would you consider reverting these changes, and then adding your LEZ boundary without upsetting the OSBL data?
An accurate LEZ boundary (which does correspond to OSBL) is available from TfL: http://roads.data.tfl.gov.uk/boundaries/LEZ_Boundary_20071113_tab_shape.zip

Thanks!
Yunkers (2019-03-09 12:42:54+00:00): Proszę nie prowadzić wojen edycyjnych. Zmiana kategorii dla Świętego Jana została wycofana 6 dni przed tą zmianą, secondary z tunelu i Rejtana też już było wycofywane.
dieterdreist (2019-03-13 22:38:38+00:00): per la sala di attesa c’è una proposta specifica nel wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waiting_room
viloan (2019-03-05 17:49:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-06 08:32:00+00:00): Hi geoaria, please follow the OSM wiki, wikipedia=fa:... , see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Thanks, Alex
Sosha1996 (2019-03-18 04:02:12+00:00): قضیه این میدون چیه؟
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576396842

رسمش بنظر اشتباه میاد
geoaria (2019-03-18 04:36:31+00:00): برای علت رسم میدان به ادیتور قبلی مراجعه کنید ، من صرفا تگ junction=roundabout  اضافه کردم. با اصلاحگر Osmose
Carto'Cité (2019-03-15 15:25:37+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette première contribution. Pour info les valeurs des tags de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23019102 ont été traduites, celles-ci sont en anglais car il s'agit d'une base de données mondiale. De plus le tag name ne doit être utilisé que pour nommer un élément qui a vraiment un nom : une rue, un quartier, un commerce ; mais pas pour décrire quelque chose. L'information a été déplacée dans le tag description.
Bonne continuation,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
Dimacn (2019-03-06 13:19:01+00:00): Прекратите вносить несуществующие парки и другие объекты. Карта OSM не полигон для игр, ею пользуется миллионы человек, а вы портите карту. Все ваши исправления будут отменены.
JamesKingdom (2019-03-06 18:44:23+00:00): I think this would be better if it was primary, the description "A highway linking large towns." fits this road, and the A27 is much bigger, plus if this is a trunk then shouldn't all of the A259 be too, and the A29? They're the same size
◪ Jarv (2019-03-19 08:45:03+00:00): In the UK, roads with 'Primary Route' Status are given the 'Trunk' highway type. Primary routes are those with Green Signs with Yellow text and this sort section of the A259 has got it, other parts of the A259 have also got this delegation but not the entire route. Primary route A roads are normally dual carriageways (like the A24), but don't have to be (such as most of the A272). Non-Primary A roads (signs are white with black text) are given the 'Primary' Highway type.

Hope this clears this confusion up
PT-53 (2022-08-19 06:52:15+00:00): Hallo Helmut,
in diesem CS
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125065896#map=11/48.1702/9.7478
wurde großflächig das Merkmal
- typ=boundary
gelöscht:
- https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125065896
 Wie z,B, hier:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247429749/history

Ist das i.O. ?
Grüße
Peter
seichter (2022-08-22 10:56:44+00:00): Hallo Peter,

geht i.O.

type=boundary steht in der Relation, ist am way überflüssig, steht nicht im Wiki und ist auch international unüblich.

Habe die tags vermutlich damals beim Präzisieren der Grenze nach LGL ganz einfach von den alten Grenzways übernommen.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-05 19:12:49+00:00): Thanks. There were a few more around there, so I fixed them too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67817882
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67817065
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 20:12:46+00:00): Revertido
4004 (2019-03-10 22:32:08+00:00): здравствуйте,
в приложении есть функция Закладки/избранное, рекомендую пользоваться ей а не редактировать карту, а то можно на каждый дом в снт повесить "дача"
камера на румлевском уже давно отмечена: обновите карты, или установите османд вместо мапсми
StephaneP (2019-03-15 15:02:14+00:00): Un oneway sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136604289 ??

Ca donne quoi dans la réalité ? Tout le monde tourne en suivant la bordure du trottoir ? Ca va faire plaisir aux enfants  :-))))
Florimondable (2019-03-15 20:47:16+00:00): Une tentative ratée d'ordonner le piéton anarchique parisien.

(c'est corrigé)
intschutschuna (2019-03-05 20:49:02+00:00): Hallo Mondstern, die Adresse auf der Website scheint falsch zu sein. Die Bäckerei ist 200m weiter südlich im Gebäude vom Baywa (Gartenstr. 103). Ist dort auch bereits eingetragen.
billyonthemountain (2019-03-06 11:40:03+00:00): Hello NetAdm,

I noticed you started doing your first edits using iD on openstreetmaps ! Congrats :-)
Quick side note: make sure to respect the opening hours syntax (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours). This way data consumer can parse the tag properly. Note that StreetComplete can also help you in creating the opening_hours tag.

Happy mapping !
NetAdm (2019-03-06 18:39:15+00:00): Hello,
Ok, thanks you for your comment and I will learn and correct this soon :-)
Happy to help openstreetmap community.
Best Regards
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-05 23:03:26+00:00): Hi again! 
Is there any reason why you removed the boundary=administrative and type=boundary tags from Olathe in this edit? Please be careful with your changes :)
bielebog (2019-03-06 07:38:41+00:00): Im Luftbild sieht das aus wie die zum Wohnhaus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248726923 daneben gehörige Garage. Also wäre das ein building=garage¹. Die Garage hat keine eigene Adresse in OSM. 

¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dgarage
btwhite92 (2019-03-26 01:17:07+00:00): Hello,
I noticed that this changeset set the far eastern section of CA 4 back to motorway. I believe this to be incorrect. Specifically:

- The RIRO intersection with WB CA 4 and Sycamore Ave is not physically divided (current ways in OSM are incorrect) which is not up to freeway standards in the US.

- The start/end points of the current trunk section on EB CA 4 as currently tagged are arbitrary, and there is no "End Freeway" or "Begin Freeway" signage as is typically in CA for point-failures of unfinished freeways (see: CA 99 & Sankey Rd, CA 149 & Shippee Rd, CA 17 & La Madrona/El Rancho) - evidence that this section is an expressway rather than a freeway.

See also:

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Route_4
"The road is an expressway from its starting point until it approaches Martinez, at which point it becomes a full freeway"

- https://www.cahighways.org/001-008.html#004
"However, it is not up to full freeway standards: many intersections are full right turns instead of gentle on- and off-ramps"

- http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_map/05k.pdf
State highways built to full freeway standards are nearly always classified as "Other Fwy or Expwy" on CA functional class maps; this section is not.
birdymaps (2019-03-05 19:45:28+00:00): Changeset should read "București, Romania. #Kaart Ground Survey 2019" instead of Sofia, Bulgaria...
Frans S (2020-04-11 13:22:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
It is a long time ago, but we now review mapping work and have a issue.
You map quite a lot of buildings and call it landuse= residential, Building=yes. is the correct one. Landus=residential  is covering a hamlet, village etc.
Please keep that in mind at future mappings
Best regards
nw520 (2019-08-17 11:35:26+00:00): public_transport=platform bitte nicht auf Straße setzen
flother (2019-03-06 09:33:18+00:00): I reverted your changes in changeset 67836737. This looks to me like a minor case of vandalism.