piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Morten Lange (2015-04-29 23:52:16+00:00): Hi hanoj, 
I see you have been changing many bicycle-counter points. I guess the aim is to have a unified way of tagging them. Is there a blog post, wiki text or similar outlining choices made and the the rationale for them ? 
Best Regards,
Morten
Morten Lange (2015-04-29 23:55:04+00:00): Perhaps add description here : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle  ?
hanoj (2015-05-02 19:47:39+00:00): OK, I try it add to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle 
bye Hanoj
Morten Lange (2015-05-04 16:34:06+00:00): Great, thanks - on behalf of myself and I imagine, on behalf of as it were,  a more harmonised/unified  tagging of bicycle counters.
Zibior2 (2015-05-08 12:00:17+00:00): A cio to? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154360226
Się coś przeciągnęło koledze...
janes (2015-05-20 07:49:35+00:00): He vist que has afegit l'etiqueta path als traçats per on han passat maquines de treure fusta.
Quin criteri segueixes per classificar-los com a camins?
Supaplex (2015-04-29 17:57:23+00:00): 籃球場可以在iD編輯器裡，打「籃球場」，應該就會出現正確的分類了
ylark (2015-05-27 09:32:23+00:00): Malheureux doublon avec les tags présents sur le way...

Conséquence : https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=mairie+de+Brunoy
Yod4z (2015-04-30 06:29:57+00:00): C'est quoi ce truc? un nom juste? je ne trouve rien qui s'appele figac OK et en plus les images sat n'indiquent aucun batiment.
Klumbumbus (2015-04-30 17:25:31+00:00): Hallo, Willkommen bei OSM. Ein kleiner Hinweis: Wenn die Garage bereits als Fläche eingetragen ist, ist es nicht notwendig, dann nochmal einen Punkt mit building=garage zu setzen, da das ja dann doppelt-gemoppelt ist.

VG
Stefan
iWowik (2015-04-29 12:32:41+00:00): This changeset should be reverted/
1) your change set comment not valid
2) you set tracks=2 on single track ways
philipskokoh (2015-04-29 09:18:32+00:00): Fixed typo in the properties.name
sgeoviz (2015-04-29 09:22:44+00:00): I mean added some missing roads
iWowik (2015-04-29 12:30:53+00:00): This changeset should be reverted/
1) your change set comment not valid
2) you set tracks=2 on single track ways
catoblepa (2015-04-29 11:10:39+00:00): riferimento source errato
catoblepa (2015-04-29 11:10:33+00:00): riferimento source errato
4rch (2015-04-30 12:21:22+00:00): Hallo, mir ist gerade aufgefallen dass der Langtang Nationalpark nicht mehr gerendert wird. Ich vermute, dass das umtaggen der äußeren Linien auf boundary=protected_area diesen Fehler ausgelöst hat und habe die Linien nun mit boundary=national_park getaggt. Gruß Arch
austi1996 (2015-04-30 12:29:38+00:00): Hi, das dürft e es nicht sein. Wenn ich es richtig gesehen habe, hat jemand zwischen meinen zwei Änderungssätzen ein Stück aus der Relation entfernt. Daniel
4rch (2015-04-30 12:41:37+00:00): achso, ok. Dann hängt wohl der Renderingserver ziemlich stark mit dem neurendern der Kacheln hinterher.
Manoj Thapa (2015-05-04 04:49:02+00:00): Hello Sang,
You are mapping building in node. Plz don't do that. building should be made on polygon. 
Thanks for your contribution.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2015-04-29 14:50:25+00:00): А если точнее, то Софиевский район.
algot (2015-04-29 15:05:10+00:00): Я поправлял дорогу Н-11 в районе Малософиевки. 
А оно рисует границі правок по центру измененного объекта.
Так что все-таки Криничанский :)
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2015-04-29 16:55:07+00:00): ОК ;-)
RicoElectrico (2017-05-04 16:47:38+00:00): Fotoradar już nie istnieje?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/891814
Kwiatkos (2017-05-05 07:46:53+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam to był zlikwidowany.
Przemieszczam się popołudniami niedaleko od tego miejsca.
Na wszelki wypadek sprawdzę przy okazji, czy w między czasie nie postawili nowego.

 

Jeśli będzie to poprawię to na osm.

 

W naszym rejonie zlikwidowano kilka fotoradarów w ostatnich czasach.

 

Pozdrawiam

 Krzysztof Kwiatkowski
Kwiatkos (2017-05-05 14:48:15+00:00): Sprawdziłem przed chwilą. Nie ma w tym miejscu żadnego fotoradaru. Na wprost szkoły nad drogą są tablice pokazujące prędkość nadjeżdżających zamiast niego ale to nie jest fotoradar.
Self-Perfection (2015-04-29 12:26:07+00:00): У этой площадки для выгула собак такое состояние, что я думаю стоит добавить префикс disused:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
schadow1 (2015-04-29 12:11:27+00:00): Hello Tim. Reverted this changeset as I mapped this through survey. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACaLaX_Cavite_Area_Under_Construction
catoblepa (2015-04-29 11:10:24+00:00): riferimento source errato
4rch (2015-04-29 11:51:06+00:00): Hello Samuel, please stop adding fictional countries. If you want to map Liberland you can use services like http://opengeofiction.net/ or http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ for your purpose.
4rch (2015-04-29 14:33:03+00:00): Hello Poshan, please do not upload bulk boundary ways which do not match with the already existing boundaries. Please use boundary relations [1] instead. When you import something you also have to follow the import guidelines [2] and make sure that you do not infringe copyright.

Regards, Arch

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
woodpeck (2015-05-02 21:33:42+00:00): I have reverted three admin boundaries that were clearly imported and over-attributed.
Poshan (2015-05-03 08:11:47+00:00): Okay. I think it is good to revert those imported vdc boundaries.
4rch (2015-05-01 11:38:32+00:00): Hello Poshan, please do not upload bulk boundary ways which do not match with the already existing boundaries. Please use boundary relations [1] instead. When you import something you also have to follow the import guidelines [2] and make sure that you do not infringe copyright.

Regards, Arch

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-29 22:02:23+00:00): Po co dodajesz same numerki do budynków?
literan (2015-04-29 16:49:45+00:00): Здравствуйте! Скажите, с какой целью вы в теге name= номер дома дублируете? Я это все поудаляю.
Alexandr Popov (2015-04-30 05:47:12+00:00): Добрый день!
Я добавляю номера домов в названии, чтобы эти номера отображались на карте.
Так удобнее понимать, какой адрес имеет то или иное здание.
Почему Вы хотите их удалить?
literan (2015-04-30 08:24:36+00:00): Номера домов отображаются на карте и так, если они стоят в теге addr:housenumber 	!!

Соответственно, из тега name я собираюсь удалить номера потому, что вы неправильно используете его. Он предназначен для названий зданий или учреждений/заведений/магазинов, занимающих все здание.
Alexandr Popov (2015-04-30 08:34:37+00:00): Хорошо. Теперь понял.
Раз так, значит в тег name буду добавлять только названия.
Спасибо за разъяснение.
literan (2015-04-30 09:01:49+00:00): Если будут вопросы - обращайтесь, подскажу.
literan (2015-04-30 09:03:17+00:00): Да, и в тег name можно добавлять только имена собственные. Описания и народные названия вроде "белый дом", "спортплощадка", "здание столовой" в него добавлять нельзя - все эти признаки описываются своими тегами.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:34:01+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Helmchen42 (2016-08-05 05:30:50+00:00): This changeset was just a fix for broken boundaries listed in Wambacher's "International Boundaries" thread.

I have neither an opinion nor knowledge about the AL2 or Morocco in those disputed regions.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-01 08:30:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2158526660/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)
Hjart (2015-04-29 13:24:43+00:00): Hej. Jeg har tilladt mig at ændre lidt på det du har lavet.

Velkommen til vores projekt iøvrigt og god fornøjelse med det.
Hjart (2015-05-02 06:34:07+00:00): Jeg har lavet denne her om til footway, da jeg ikke anser den for at være en decideret gågade
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-05-02 14:19:59+00:00): Ifølge wikien bør footway ikke bruges på arealer.
Hjart (2015-05-02 15:31:50+00:00): Det har du ret i. Jeg fatter dog ikke at det skulle være bedre at bruge highway=pedestrian, som det ifølge selvsamme wiki åbenbart er almindeligt.
Demian O (2015-04-30 17:59:26+00:00): Added speed limit, set value to residential zone speed limit.
Supaplex (2015-04-29 17:46:28+00:00): 一般來說失去原有功能的東西，會在標籤前加disused:XX
我來改掉好了
Supaplex (2015-04-29 17:48:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30630885
修改的連結
Ericcl (2015-04-29 15:55:45+00:00): Moved Hydro city hall to new current location. Old location now Police Department
Ericcl (2015-04-29 15:56:41+00:00): Added new event center that opened in December 2014
Ericcl (2015-04-29 15:56:16+00:00): Added softball field
Ericcl (2015-04-29 15:56:58+00:00): Added baseball field
Ericcl (2015-04-29 15:35:29+00:00): Corrected local name of road (no 'e' in Arapaho in W. Oklahoma). See nearby City name Arapaho.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2015-05-01 13:56:05+00:00): Merci pour ces relevés de terrain. Néanmoins, je remarque que les noms sont tous en minuscules... Pense à mettre une majuscule aux noms propres ainsi qu'au premier mot du nom de POI !
Xmypblu (2015-04-30 16:37:18+00:00): пожалуйста, используйте хоткей "s" для создания домов с прямыми углами стен... а то страшно на это смотреть
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Using_Aerial_Imagery
или переходите на редактор JOSM + плагин для рисования зданий, будет аккуратней, проще и намного быстрее:
http://josm.ru/
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14850
boneco (2015-04-29 16:24:30+00:00): Johnny, estacionamentos não devem compartilhar o mesmo nó com as ruas, é uma boa pratica de mapeamento, ajudar o roteamento.
Qualquer dúvida pode entrar em contato.
boneco (2015-04-29 16:28:19+00:00): Estacionamento não, praças.
JohnnySilveira (2015-04-29 16:32:16+00:00): Obrigado pelo toque!
freebeer (2018-12-16 16:44:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65526372 where the changeset comment is: Please use your HOTosm projects only for mapping things that really exist, not as your own personal playground, thanks
SomeoneElse (2015-05-01 23:58:59+00:00): Just for info something went a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3486992968/history - it got added at latitude 0, longitude 0 (I've since deleted it).
5m4u9 (2015-04-30 07:31:40+00:00): Lucia, bienvenida. Lo que te faltó fue añadir una característica o propiedad al área y al nodo. 

en el caso del área debió ser un edificio (debiste buscar en el formulario) y en el caso del nodo creo que querías hacer un punto de interés... pero hay muchos !!

Revisa cómo edité viendo http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341538650
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-30 08:03:43+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=500331#p500331
SomeoneElse (2015-09-18 15:54:23+00:00): As with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34094400 , it doesn't make a lot of sense to make up a name using both the Welsh and English versions.  What would be correct would be "name:cy=Twmpa; name:en=Lord Herefords Knob" and then either "name=Twmpa" or "name=Lord Herefords Knob" (although OS Opendata has only the latter both names are used pretty much interchangeably here)
lubosb (2015-05-01 08:43:35+00:00): Hi Steward Camelo,

hope you understand english.

I just noticed your edits but I think you made few mistakes. Please, take a look at them.

Here you marked two buildings with tags highway=road, but they should be taged as building=yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341560585/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341560500/history

One road marked twice, you should mark it only once in the middle of road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341560601/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341560541/history

And here, you add some way, but without any tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341813957/history

Can you please try to fix these problems?

If you have any questions, please ask in:

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
miwuetc (2015-04-30 00:13:53+00:00): 謝謝指教，
不過有個小問題請教，除非記錯，原本是用多邊形數化這個空間，為何現在變成線的物件了呢？這是使用disused的慣例嗎？
再請告知，不好意思了。
Supaplex (2015-05-04 03:22:44+00:00): 這是iD解讀的關係，在開放街圖上只有三種資料：點、線、關係。區域其實是頭尾相接的線條。
Supaplex (2015-05-04 03:23:55+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341500519
注意第一個點跟最後一個點編號一樣
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
maraf24 (2016-03-09 17:23:43+00:00): Co znaczy Jankowicka DP 9, szczególnie to "DP 9", i jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
Kris09 (2016-03-10 17:42:53+00:00): Witam 
Jankowicka DP9 to nazwa drogi.
DP 9 to Droga Pożarowa 9.
Nazwy i numery dróg umieszczane są na tabliczkach przy skrzyżowaniach dróg. Nazwy, jak np. Jankowicka, posiadają tylko niektóre drogi, natomiast oznaczenia DP i numer posiadają wszystkie główne drogi leśne. 
pozdrawiam 
Kris09
maraf24 (2016-03-10 19:24:36+00:00): Sugerowałbym więc rozwinięcie skrótu DP, bo taka jest generalna zasada w polskim OSM, że w nazwach dróg nie używamy skrótów, bo ich rozwinięcie np. w celu odczytania przez nawigację, bywa problematyczne. Np. "ks." może  oznaczać księdza lub księcia.
Kris09 (2016-03-10 19:57:12+00:00): Owszem, dla dróg publicznych tak, ale to są drogi wewnętrzne Lasów Państwowych. Ruch na tych drogach jest ograniczony. W takim terenie większość nawigacji ma problemy z odczytaniem. Wydaje mi się, że w takich sytuacjach najłatwiej jest wskazać miejsce docelowe na mapie lub wpisać współrzędne GPS.
maraf24 (2016-03-10 20:26:26+00:00): Gdzie indziej drogi pożarowe są opisane pełną nazwą, a nie skrótem. Posiadanie spójnego nazewnictwa też pomaga, bo była już propozycja innego oznaczania tych dróg.
Kris09 (2016-03-20 17:14:46+00:00): Dzięki za uwagi do wprowadzonych zmian.
Zgodnie z sugestią uzupełnię nazwy dróg. Zmiany wprowadzę możliwie jak najszybciej.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
luschi (2015-04-29 19:32:20+00:00): Löschung von FON Accesspoints aus fragwürdigem Inport von Changeset 636656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/636656
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-04 17:38:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30785670 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after complaints to DWG, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/635
zimba (2015-04-29 21:03:10+00:00): Top, Danke! Die FON Nodes waren mir immer schon suspekt, und dazu oft offensichtlich falsch. Danke fuers loeschen.
Richard528993 (2015-04-29 19:39:43+00:00): Shapes in polygon appear similar to homesteads found elsewhere.Sorry if incorrect.
Muokkaaja (2015-05-04 12:30:47+00:00): You have ruined this map
sabas88 (2015-04-30 07:32:31+00:00): Occhio, invece di tracciare un campo avevi messo il tag del campo sulla laguna di venezia :-) Ho corretto io
Kris Anselmo (2015-04-30 10:36:59+00:00): Pourquoi avoir fait disparaître la piste d'athlétisme?
fmorel (2015-05-03 22:12:10+00:00): Le stade et la piste ont été remplacé par plusieurs mini-stades "Sport dans la ville" entourés d'une piste. Dans la réalité ce n'est plus une piste d'athlétisme à proprement parler (pas aux normes standard disons).
Elle y est toujours dans OSM, entourant les 5 mini-stades.
Allison P (2021-12-23 21:59:45+00:00): A lot of these roads are driveways, not tracks. Please fix them.
sladen (2015-08-06 10:43:50+00:00): This seems to duplicate the prior (more detailed) provision documented at:

  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Channel_Tunnel
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 09:09:59+00:00): @sladen - are you OK to revert this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341629727 looks pretty implausible to me.
sladen (2015-08-17 10:11:57+00:00): @SomeoneElse; I followed up with @jpsyl who said they'd added the extra "ferry" route after their satnav had been unable to route via the provided "shutte_train" routeing.  This is a more general issue (the routeing engine don't cope with the schema used), so I've left it for the moment.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 10:13:29+00:00): @sladen - thanks.  Did they log a bug in whatever satnav doesn't like the previous route as mapped?
muralito (2015-05-09 16:54:00+00:00): Un barrio lo podes mapear como nodo, o como poligono, pero si lo mapeas como poligono el poligono tienen que ser los limites.
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:34:15+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:34:04+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:33:54+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:33:42+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:33:30+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:33:15+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:31:15+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake
Agermeister (2015-04-29 22:33:05+00:00): #hotosm-nepal-earthquake