piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sundew (2022-04-28 11:12:41+00:00): Danke, dass du dich zurückgemeldet hast.
Es mag sein, dass du NUR dir bekannte Parkplätze anpassen wolltest und es mag auch sein, dass du zumindest diese teilweise selbst kennst. Allerdings hat dein Editor mit deiner Hilfe in genau den selben Changesets jede Menge anderer Objekte verändert, die du NIE persönlich geprüft haben kannst. 
Wenn dein ID-Editor dir andere Korrekturen vorschlägt, bedeutet es noch lange nicht, dass du sie auch durchführen musst und schon gar nicht im Umkreis von mehr als ein paar Metern. Du bist dafür verantwortlich, nicht Editor oder App.
Alle deine Changesets mit dem Namen "Fehlerkorrekturen gemäß Vorschlägen, Verfeinerungen" sind großflächige automatische Änderungen. Du kannst sie jetzt selbst revertieren oder sie werden revertiert.
Du solltest jetzt das auch sein lassen, weitere dieser Edits durchzuführen, um nicht noch mehr unnötige Hin- und Rückänderungen zu veranlassen.
Mit der Bitte um kurzfristige Meldung.
Danke & LG,
sundew
Nakaner (2022-04-28 13:54:30+00:00): Hallo !MRGBoss,

deine Änderungen werden mittlerweile im OSM-Forum diskutiert. Du bist eingeladen, dich dort an der Diskussion zu beteiligen. Der Login erfolgt mit deinem OSM-Konto. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75475

Die Änderungsvorschläge des iD-Editors stammen zu einem großen Teil aus dem Name Suggestion Index. Dieser wird auf GitHub ohne ausreichende Beteiligung der Community gepflegt. Anhand simpler Auswahlregeln werden bei Objekten im Editor Änderungsvorschläge gemacht. Diese sind nicht zwangsläufig richtig. Falsche Zuordnungen passieren. Für derart simple Regeln braucht es keine Änderungen in der Datenbank. Datenkonsumenten, die eine solche Zuordnung von Läden zu Wikidata-Ladenketten-IDs wünschen, können diese auch selbst mit den auf GitHub veröffentlichten Regelsätzen durchführen, ohne dass die OSM-Datenbank bearbeitet werden muss (und Qualitätsmängel sind dann auch egal).

OpenStreetMap ist eine von Menschen gepflegte Datenbank, kein Bot-Feld. Das heißt, dass Qualität vor Quantität geht. Durch das "Verbessern" (eigentlich Ergänzen von Zusatzattributen anhand maschinenlesbarer Regeln) wird eine Aktualität der POIs suggeriert, die nicht gegeben ist. Hast du überprüft, ob der Debitel-Laden in der Christophstraße 2 in 80538 München (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/297163604/history) noch existiert? Vor dir war dort schon ein Bot aktiv – damals übrigens streng nach dem Regelwerk (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) mit Vorab-Diskussion und Dokumentation.

Zum Vorwurf des mechanischen Editierens: Ich stimme sundew zu.

Bitte unterlasse daher, diese gut gemeinten, aber unnützen Massenedits.

Viele Grüße

Michael
!MRGBoss (2022-05-02 18:32:21+00:00): Ich habe mich unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75475 geäußert, allerdings scheint es, dass entweder der Post noch freigegeben werden muss (mir wird er jedenfalls nicht angezeigt).

Sinngemäß aus dem Gedächtnis, was ich schrieb:

Zunächst bitte ich um Entschuldigung für Extra-Aufwand aufgrund meiner großflächigen Edits.

Bei einer Revertierung bitte ich nichtsdestotrotz um eine sorgfältige Abwägung, da auch sinnvolle Änderungen außerhalb der ID davon betroffen sein können (wie die Verfeinerung von Wegen, die mit Luftbild eindeutig falsch eingezeichnet waren).

Mit besten Grüßen
sundew (2022-05-02 20:48:29+00:00): Hi !MRGBoss,
danke für die positive Rückmeldung. Deine Änderungen waren zu umfangreich, um von draußen zu sehen, was genau du als eigenen Beitrag geleistet hast und was nicht. Ich habe mindestens 28 Changesets gefunden, die hier im Raum Hamburg hauptsächlich oder nebenbei unter anderen Changeset-Kommentaren irgendwas quasi automatisiert geändert haben. Da ich das nicht beurteilen kann, werde ich in den nächsten Tagen wohl nur hier in Hamburg und Umgebung die POIs oder POI-Typen teilreverten, die ich auch selbst einmal im Jahr vor Ort prüfe. Was andere Mapper in den anderen Städten machen, kann ich nicht sagen.
Ich hoffe, dass du in Zukunft vorsichtiger mit deinem Editor agierst, insbesondere was irgendwelche automatischen Änderungsvorschläge von ID auch beim ganz normalen Bearbeiten betrifft.
LG und frohes echtes Mappen!
sundew
mavl (2022-05-20 16:00:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:11:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-05-14 12:59:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/322499475. What s the meaning of the key N?
mavl (2022-05-20 16:11:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-04-27 04:33:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/257052687/history. You change the key admin_level to 1, but this value is reserved for objects bigger than a country. Please correct this.
eggie (2022-04-26 15:27:16+00:00): Dag Klaas..  Dit lijkt me niet cotrrect. Volgens mij ligt hier geen brug, maar loopt er een duiker.
Een brug zou je kunnen toevoegen aan een wegelement met bridge=yes en layer=1
De omtrek van een brug kun je ook toevoegen met man_made=bridge layer=1
Hier zal het een duiker zijn. Ik pas even wat aan. 
Wanneer alle grond daar is weggegraven en de sloten met elkaar zijn  verbonden dit jaar .. laat maar weten. Dan draai ik mijn wijziging terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 15:32:41+00:00): tunnel=culvert
layer=-1
waterway=drain 
toegevoegd
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 13:58:11+00:00): Hello!

Can you help me with this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9694868858? What kind of attraction is it? I was there a couple of days ago but did not realise it.

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 14:02:33+00:00): Also please note, that the name you added is not the name of the memorial here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219167606/. The key name=* is only used for actual names and not for descriptions (for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 14:06:32+00:00): Sorry to bother you again :-) Also please when adding a shop=* be so kind to map it as a node. In Bremen we tend to keep POI data separate from building data. Thanks!
Pavol33 (2022-04-26 14:20:00+00:00): Ahoj, som novacik. Prosim o opravu mojich chyb. Davam mena take, ake maju na Tripadvisor a na googlemaps.
Prosim, pozri si na googlemaps a uvidis, co to je. Fotku ti mozem poslat
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 14:28:09+00:00): Dobrý deň a vitajte! GoogleMaps a Tripadvisor nie sú pre nás v OSM prijateľné (a spoľahlivé) zdroje. Skôr ako niečo zmapujete, overte si to v teréne, aby sme mali dlhodobo dobrú kvalitu údajov. Ak potrebujete pomoc, obráťte sa na miestnu komunitu (prípadne prostredníctvom fóra OSM). Znovu upravím veci, ktoré ste zmapovali v Brémach. Každopádne ďakujeme za vaše príspevky :-)

(Translated with DeepL)
Pavol33 (2022-04-26 14:37:19+00:00): Veď ja som to pridal na základe toho, že som tam bol a videl to. Teda toto pravidlo ovládam. Len názov som si overil na týchto portáloch. Preto prosím nemazať.
Pavol33 (2022-04-26 14:38:01+00:00): Zmapoval som skutočné veci a všetko mám nafotené ako dôkaz.
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 14:43:27+00:00): Nepochopili ste ma. Nebudem veci odstraňovať, ale upravím atribúty tak, aby boli v súlade s pravidlami OSM. Prečítajte si najmä nasledujúci odkaz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (ak neovládate angličtinu, použite prekladač, napr. https://www.deepl.com/translator). S pozdravom!

(Translated with DeepL)
ToniE (2023-04-02 11:35:25+00:00): Hi,

is this bridge still under construction?
Do you know any opening data?

Regards
Toni
DanielHessDo (2023-04-03 19:00:13+00:00): Hi,

yes it is. The old bridge was demolished almost a year ago. Currently they are reconstructing the bases on both sides.

According to
https://meinschwerte.de/2022/04/20/bruecke-am-kirschbaumsweg-ab-25-04-2022-gesperrt/
they plan to work on the new bridge until December 2023.

Regards,

Daniel
ToniE (2023-04-03 19:10:00+00:00): Thanks.
impiaaa (2022-04-26 21:00:43+00:00): Please write more descriptive changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, try to save your changes in one local area before moving somewhere else.
Carnildo (2022-04-26 21:14:15+00:00): Please don't add random objects to the map.  Instead, map what what actually exists.  I've reverted this changeset.
Harel M (2022-04-27 09:55:43+00:00): Hi, please note that you have created a polygon with two identical points. Can you please fix this?
maraf24 (2022-04-27 10:55:47+00:00): 1. budowa się rozpoczęła dawno temu i była zaznaczona
2. mapowanie na podstawie filmików z youTube'a nie jest dozwolone
3. zmapowanie nawet nie odpowiada temu, co widać na filmie
np. 
- most nad Widawą nie jest w budowie
- przy Olszewskiego nie ma budują aktualnie drogi
- przy Dembowiskiego/8 Maja również nie ma budowy,  tam jest aktualnie parking budowy
user_5359 (2022-04-27 14:28:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9694965309, http://www.osm.org/node/9694965307, http://www.osm.org/node/9694965306. Please notice the typo: use sidewalk instead of "side walk". But the main problem: Is key isn't for a node, this key is for a way.
osm915 (2022-06-14 18:21:47+00:00): Hi Gisolic
why did you duplicate Queen Alia International Airport by creating
https://osm.org/node/9694969446
in addition to the long time existing and well mapped 
https://osm.org/way/156580417

Usually I would have just cleand up the new node (which carries much less information anyway), but since you also worked on the older way and the same was done multiple times, this seems to be done by purpose.
Other examples from you and your #digitalegypt colleagues are
Amman Airport (https://osm.org/node/9689702728 vs https://osm.org/way/156580173)
Aqaba Airport (https://osm.org/node/9689551997 vs https://osm.org/way/156581561)
Cairo International Airport (https://osm.org/node/9624259312 vs https://osm.org/way/135896473)

Best regards and happy mapping!
Gisolic (2022-06-16 10:12:06+00:00): Hello osm915;
Thank you for your comment and for bringing me attention to this point, when we reviewed "aeroway=aerodrome" by overpass query we found some of them have polygons and don't have nodes and vice versa in nodes, so we wanted to make unification about these cases to make every "aeroway=aerodrome" contain both node and Polygons, but after that, we made some research and found the airport boundary is more descriptive than the node, so we will review all the node we worked before and fixed it.
Best Regards
Gisolic
eggie (2022-04-26 15:41:06+00:00): Dag Gino.. Ik heb hier construction=residential verwijderd. Die specificatie had je laten staan. Ook wat straatnamen toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 15:43:03+00:00): Weet je zeker dat de Belgiëstraat een residential is en geen highway=path?
De straat loopt door het water. Is daar geen brug?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 15:49:43+00:00): Brug toegevoegd aan Belgiëstraat.

De brug die je hebt verwijderd bij het Verenigd Koninkrijkhof zie ik gewoon op de luchtfoto van maart 2022?

https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=26-04-2021&loc=51.98189%2C4.253656%2C18z&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-03-02&acqid=20220302_112112_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
Gino Bergwerff (2022-04-26 16:58:42+00:00): De Belgiëstraat zoals die getekend is ligt niet goed. Die gaat tussen de nummers 1 verderop.
Gino Bergwerff (2022-04-26 16:59:58+00:00): De brug aan Verenigd Koninkrijk is vorige week weggehaald
eggie (2022-04-26 17:03:30+00:00): Oke.. up to you.. Ik heb niets aan het verloop van de straten gewijzigd. 
Alleen vanaf de Ierlandkade een voetgangersverbinding gemaakt naar de Veilingweg. Mocht dat niet kloppen laat het even weten.
Groet eggie
Gino Bergwerff (2022-04-26 17:41:56+00:00): Ook dat dijkje tussen de ierlamdkade en de veilingweg is verwijderd en is nu water...
eggie (2022-04-26 17:44:46+00:00): Oke.. ik zal het zo weer weghalen. Dan zie je toch dat lokale kennis belangrijker is dan de laatste sat foto.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 18:00:22+00:00): Done...
SomeoneElse (2023-01-23 13:57:18+00:00): Hello borovac,
Just to be clear, we can't use wikipedia as a source for OpenStreetMap, because the licence is not compatible,  Of course, whatever source was used to update wikipedia may have a compatible licence - but you'll need to track down the sources that were used.
Certainly, the "name:en" that you have used here ("Baker Street tube...") is a loc_name, not a regular "name" at all.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
borovac (2023-01-24 07:36:02+00:00): Thank you for drawing me attention to the improper use of wikipedia. I fixed name:en in loc_name
All best Milan Borovac (borovac)
trigpoint (2023-01-25 13:37:00+00:00): Hi Milan
I originally spotted the odd looking Welsh name whilst route planning with OSMand set to Welsh.

The Welsh name is also a description rather than the name. You seem to have simply copied the titles from Wikipedia for Welsh and other languages. In Wikipedia the title obviously needs something to differentiate the station page from the street page. That is not necessary in OSM.
Cheers Phil
borovac (2023-01-25 14:59:37+00:00): Hi Phil, Thanks for reaching out, I’ve removed it, to avoid any future confusion. Thanks for pointing out this irregularity on Wikipedia and mine on OSM. 
All the best,
Borovac
SomeoneElse (2023-01-31 14:16:44+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6823 .
borovac (2023-01-31 15:19:23+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,

I have removed data added by using Wikipedia. Can you please double check if everything is ok so I can avoid being block again?
SomeoneElse (2023-02-02 13:36:58+00:00): Yes - thanks.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-11 03:12:08+00:00): I've just had a quick look, and a little over 6000 of your other changesets also use wikipedia as a source.  Is that something that you can undo yourself, or would you like some help doing that?
borovac (2023-02-11 09:25:57+00:00): Hi,
Can you please give me a few days to extract all the changesets so that I can do a revert of all them, and avoid making some mistakes in process.
When I finish reverting my changesets and made them all the correction, I will let you know so that we can further coordinate if there is anything else I need to fix.
Thanks again and sorry again for the misunderstanding.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:11:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:11:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:11:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-04-27 14:46:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2022-04-26 15:56:14+00:00): Die schuuurtjes heb ik weer hersteld vanuit de BAG met de juiste gegevens.
Groet
eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-04-26 12:19:20+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzAsOTk5XX0%3D&location=36.279114%2C-85.108864%2C17.96
Chincha1 (2022-05-14 12:16:37+00:00): No need to add sidewalk tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120210560
janolezab (2022-05-15 20:30:07+00:00): Not quite sure why you think so. But I made sidewalk tagging more precise with Cs 121024734 now.
Chincha1 (2022-08-19 11:28:55+00:00): Thanks Jan
Carnildo (2022-04-26 21:27:19+00:00): I've reverted all of your changes except the very first one.  If you continue to add nonsense to the map, you're likely to be blocked.
user_5359 (2022-04-27 14:43:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9695007310. What is the meaning of the tag Muhallah = Loye Jumat, Muhallah Tarkhan Khel, Ghalegay, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The key name has the same value, but what is the meaning?
ma-rt-in (2022-04-30 09:21:46+00:00): Hello,

what exactly do you want to communicate with your fixme on the road?
MxxCon (2022-04-27 04:19:52+00:00): Hello.
There are 2 significant problems with your edit.
First, the "description" tag must never be used for advertisement or other promotional messaging. You can see this documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Second, you tagged your business as the whole building, when it's clearly not the case. In situations where multiple business are the same building, they must be mapped as separate POI nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120211421
TheSwavu (2022-05-03 10:08:36+00:00): Hi,

This changeset allowed people coming up the off ramp at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/280889414 to cross over and go down the ramp. Another mapper tried to fix it but their turn restriction wasn't valid. I put cross back in to force the right turn but still let the left turn down the ramp go. 

Can you please review.

Thanks.
Diacritic (2022-05-03 11:39:35+00:00): Hey, thanks for the heads up.

Not sure what happened here with my edit - I think I must have cleared it while trying to remove some of the tangled ways.

I've tried to realign it with what was my original intention, putting an only right turn on that off ramp edge. Happy to adjust again if that's not a winner either.
sorcrosc (2022-04-26 17:08:29+00:00): Grazie per la verifica. Molto efficiente ;)
Ho invertito la direzione come la vedo sulle immagini Bing.

Ciao
micheleOSM3 (2026-04-14 11:28:36+00:00): Ciao, ho dei dubbi sul nome di questo tratto stradale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39273074). "Frazione" mi sembra più una descrizione del luogo che il nome della via. Corrisponde a quanto riportato su cartelli o altro?
Ale_Zena_IT (2022-04-26 15:07:04+00:00): Hello,
I think we don't need such a huge area changesets (from Philippines to UK).
Please, consider to keep it much much much smaller.
Thanks
ljb_nj (2022-04-30 17:22:49+00:00): Hello, Your changes broke Batona Trail near Quaker Bridge. There is now a rather large gap in the trail relation and it is no longer continuous. Can you explain why you did this and what is the source of the changes? This trail was mostly mapped using personal GPS tracks by me and others.
Pilot_Forest (2022-05-19 12:01:59+00:00): it is actually continuous now, but not directly.
USGS Topographic maps and satellite imagery shows that we can re-access Batona Trail via Lower Forge Road and Goodwater Road.

and this is what is actually on the ground.
ljb_nj (2022-05-22 19:30:13+00:00): No, it is NOT continuous. You introduced a break in the Batona trail relation when you incorrectly joined it to Goodwater Rd just S of Quaker Bridge, and then deleted the path to where it crosses Lower Forge Road.  There is now a discontinuity in the trail relation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4129027

If you can't see it, take a look at the presentation of OSM data on hiking.waymarkedtrails.org:

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/39.7094/-74.6638

This trail was originally mapped with GPS by several people including myself. The trail does NOT follow Goodwater Road or Lower Forge Road. This is deliberate - the trail designers and maintainers want to keep foot-traffic off the roads to avoid conflicts with motor vehicles and bicycles.
ljb_nj (2022-05-25 23:33:28+00:00): I managed to get out there with GPS, camera, and maps. Your changes to Batona Trail are correct and I was wrong. The trail DOES join Goodwater Rd about 600 ft before the turn to Quaker Bridge, and it DOES stay on Lower Forge Rd about 300 ft north of that intersection. I apologize for the mistake.

The only thing left to fix is to add segments to the trail relation so it is continuous again, and I will do that in another changeset.
hanchao (2022-04-27 07:50:43+00:00): 已删
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120245494
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-08 01:09:56+00:00): esta via esta bloqueada? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9695090725
Fidelis Assis (2022-09-08 16:04:29+00:00): A imagem mostra que estava em mar/2022: https://www.google.com/maps/@-18.1820107,-47.9415319,3a,75y,52.59h,92.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOmWfgM5_YiFV2V9gr4OUxw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Você tem alguma informação mais recente?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-30 19:28:25+00:00): Please don't remove addresses. 
Reverted
tastrax (2022-05-06 11:44:21+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-30 19:21:26+00:00): Why?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120212578
sanch3z (2022-04-26 13:31:02+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen! Deine Changeset-Kommentare sind nicht gerade aussagekräftig. Hier findest du ein paar gute Beispiele: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Beispiele
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-07 13:26:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120668526 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that among other things broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762 .  See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120399094 .
canfe (2022-05-04 15:23:40+00:00): Ma il park mappato è davvero un park?
Mi sembra un po' troppo piccolo.
Non è un garden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120213798
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-07 13:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120668526 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that among other things broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762 .  See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120399094 .
eggie (2022-04-26 18:15:37+00:00): Dag a angelov.. Wanneer er geen parkeerplaats meer is heb je het correct gedaan.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-07 13:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120668526 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that among other things broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762 .  See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120399094 .
wkdgs (2022-05-11 10:58:43+00:00): Könntest du bei deinen Löschungen kurz eine Begründung angegeben? Oder zumindest schreiben, ob du das vor Ort geprüft oder eine andere Quelle verwendet hast.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120214115
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 07:06:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055052588/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
HKHikerhang (2022-04-26 18:11:55+00:00): 岩頭 is now used in gov't maps, not a historical name. Please revert.
SF23 (2022-05-08 10:02:12+00:00): Hallo habi. Das Gebäude war nur mit building:construction=construction getagged. Habe dies als "construction=apartments" und "building=construction" markiert (analog dem Gebäude daneben). Änderungssatz 120695884
LG
habi (2022-05-08 15:45:17+00:00): Ciao SF23
Mersi fürs drüberschauen und korrigieren.
Ich find' auch cool, wie du das mit der Baustelle der Monibjoustrasse gelöst hast.
Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
sektov (2022-05-26 14:40:45+00:00): Dear moyogo,
how is the alt_name differing?