piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Володимир Михайлюк (2017-08-14 09:14:10+00:00): Це штучно стаорена водойма, місцевв назтвають її «Озером» (я місцевий)
olehz (2017-08-14 09:37:02+00:00): Так там поруч два штучних озера і на обох вказана власна назва "Озеро". Не схоже, що мова йде про власну назву, адже їх неможливо відрізнити. А те, що і перше, і друге є озером і так зрозуміло.
opendcc (2017-08-14 18:04:23+00:00): Hello,

are you sure about the name?

best regards
Myazyk (2018-06-08 15:01:52+00:00): Явенів чи Ясенів?
Володимир Михайлюк (2018-06-08 18:37:34+00:00): Ясенів!
Myazyk (2018-06-09 12:34:55+00:00): Чого ж Ти тоді наносив на карту Явенів?
chnav (2017-08-15 06:31:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, в этой правке вы удалили два полигона residential и нарисовали несколько новых. Две важные ошибки:  

1. Пожалуйста старайтесь не удалять, а уточнять геометрию.
2. Вы нарисовали полигоны residential, которые "прилеплены" к дорогам, в результате
а) на дорогах появились ненужные узлы на прямых участках
б) при редактировании полигонов residential новыми пользователями дороги станут кривыми.

Полигоны residential и дороги никак не должны бвть связаны, делайте отступ на несколько метров от дорог если рисуете полигоны.  

chnav
chnav (2017-08-15 06:36:11+00:00): Два полигона https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515485808 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515485810 соприкасаются. В чем их смысл если можно нарисовать один полигон ? Это разные микрорайоны или что ?
В чем смысл выделения участков дорог из полигонов residential ? По википедии этим тегом помечаются зоны, _в основном_ занятые жилыми домами. Если внутри попадётся несколько магазинов или административных зданий то вырезать их _не надо_.
chnav (2017-08-15 06:39:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
chnav (2017-08-15 06:57:46+00:00): Я не знаток редактора Potlatch, он довольно сильно ограничен в функционале.  

В программе JOSM уточнение линий производится инструментом W, при этом сохраняется объект и его история, а новые точки добавляются с удержанием клавиши Ctrl. Очень мощный иснтрумент, у именя в дневнике есть несколько полезных ссылок https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chnav/diary/18068 там же есть ссылка на русскоязычный форум для вопросов/обсуждений.
30303020 (2018-07-15 16:59:57+00:00): Hey AlaskaDave,
please have a look at this node you edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/65910093 and check the tagging.
Thx and happy mapping
30303020
AlaskaDave (2018-07-15 19:42:47+00:00): Fixed it. The tag was meant for the food shop nearby. 
Thx.
Noen (2017-08-14 14:02:54+00:00): Hi!
This changeset seems to focus on splitting roads on public_transport=stop_position nodes at the start/end of bus routes. Is this really necessary?
There is a warning for this in the JOSM validator, but i can't find anything on this issue in wiki.openstreetmap, the talk mailing list or the talk-transit mailing list.

Be careful not to split incomplete bus routes.
Polyglot (2017-08-14 14:13:27+00:00): I started doing this in bus stations, but I'm convinced that it makes a lot of sense at the beginning and end of the routes.
I'm 'traveling' around the world to test the PT_Assistant plugin and also to see how public transport is being mapped in different places.
chillly (2017-08-14 15:13:05+00:00): So you're not really travelling and seeing what is really there, you're making undiscussed, mass edits from the comfort of your armchair. Do you think this is a good idea and that it is acceptable?
Polyglot (2017-08-14 16:13:51+00:00): Of course I think it's acceptable or I wouldn'tbe doing it. I agree the changesets are big and it would be better that locals do them.
They take hours of time to work on though. Splitting ways has the consequence of affecting several other route relations, which in turn need to checked too.
I see it as a form of quality control.
I do agree that adding public_transport=platform to the bus_station was probably not the best solution. It would be far better to have a public_transport=platform node and add those to the route relations, but that is information that I don't have and in this case it could also not be inferred from what was already mapped previously. So there is still a lot of work to do for you guys. I hope the JOSM's PT_Assistant pluign can help you do that in a more efficient way.
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-28 22:24:14+00:00): Baustelle entmappt, da ist vor Ort keine mehr zu sehen. Bitte eingemappte Autobahnbaustellen zeitnah wieder entfernen. Danke!
nmsl🤣 (2017-08-18 06:22:08+00:00): 如果你熟悉深圳的公交线路的话，你可以尝试编辑一下THX
RobJN (2017-09-27 19:52:01+00:00): Thanks for doing the buildings. We (mappa mercia group) were in Rugeley in May and I only just got to adding my survey notes. Having the buildings mapped made this much easier :-)
James Derrick (2017-09-28 14:14:47+00:00): Glad to help - I'm following the canal adding detail to areas from past visits.

The house numbering looks far from straightforward - odd/even/consecutive and even 'a'.
What would we do without the JOSM terracer? :-)

Happy Mapping,

James
iriman (2017-12-01 11:40:48+00:00): سلام
ظاهرا ناخواسته این نقطه را جابه‌جا کرده‌اید
لطفاً اصلاح بفرمایید
4623912762
pasharm (2017-09-21 20:08:19+00:00): Слово вулиця потрібно писати в кінці назви: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D1.80.D1.8F.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BA_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.96.D0.B2_.D1.83_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.85_.D0.B2.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D1.8C
Arlas (2017-08-17 15:56:13+00:00): Hi, you are using ID editor so maybe you don't realize, but there are relation for bus routes with highway segments that you shouldn't regroup again, like "Gandoffla" street. Thanks
mikefalzon (2017-08-18 05:57:08+00:00): Hi, You're right. I'm not too familiar with the concept of relations. What happened here is that someone had edited streets and made them pedestrian only so I changed them back. Thank you
nickjohnston (2018-10-18 17:04:25+00:00): Hi. In this changeset, you've changed the name of a small building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476263573) to "terminal B". Since it's nowhere near the actual terminal B, this seems like a mistake. You've also renamed several roads to "terminal B". Some of these were previously called "Terminal C - Arrivals" and similar, which seems more correct. Could you please take a look and fix? Thanks :)
marinad_telenav (2018-10-25 06:57:22+00:00): Hi. Thanks for pointing this out. I deleted the name from the building and road ( the ways connected with that road was modified by another user using local knowledge and I'm assuming it's correct without name).
GOwin (2017-11-06 10:57:19+00:00): Hi Ernie. Welcome to OSM, and thank you for the contribution.

Please do not rename objects . and only add proper names, without additional information like descriptions.

You need to make sure that you load the already existing objects, before you attempt to digitize aerial imagery.

If you need help, you can ask questions at fb.com/OSMph/community
Tantri Maya (2022-12-01 03:09:43+00:00): Hi, paul evance

You did great job. Due to spiky building issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30234/task/142649254
also based on Maxar and Bing Aerial Imagery, I found that this object is a building , not a multipolygon.
So I have to delete it.
Thanks for your understanding.
Happy Mapping!
DUGA (2021-04-18 16:19:21+00:00): You added a bridge...of what? Please carefully check the map after each saving.
Allroads (2017-12-09 11:48:49+00:00): Thanks!
GerdP (2017-08-23 06:42:10+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier versehentlich drei heighway=<unterschiedlich> erzeugt. 
Ich denke, unclassified würde passen, aber Du warst vor Ort.
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420011825 und anschließende.
roland44 (2017-08-28 17:47:23+00:00): Ja, war ein Fehler. Ist aber schon korrigiert worden.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
trial (2019-10-29 13:38:01+00:00): merci de ne pas confondre hangar agricole et hangar aéronautique (oui iD est trompeur)
Abasusa (2019-10-29 16:40:20+00:00): Désolé,et merci d'avoir corriger.
trial (2019-10-29 17:58:11+00:00): pas de soucis, iD était un vrai piège (j'ai changé la traduction, on ne devrait plus se faire avoir). C'est l'avantage des logiciels libres/données libres : on peut corriger l'origine du problème.
OKANO Takayoshi (2017-08-14 10:26:35+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3077814938

このノードを削除して、タグを敷地とおぼしきウェイにそのまま移されていますが、住居表示の住居番号(addr:housenumber)は建物につくものなので不適切ではないでしょうか。
yasushi00 (2017-08-14 23:38:34+00:00): おっしゃる通り、敷地には addr:housenumber タグは不適切ですので、敷地から削除します。
ご指摘ありがとうございました。
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-16 14:59:52+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
madu21 (2017-08-17 05:42:17+00:00): Dzięki za info.
Øukasz (2017-08-17 20:24:45+00:00): thanks for catching this, i was just trying to figure out where did the label i was looking for go ;) 

it seems there is some overlap between this and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599019138 - both are tagged as capital for some reason. i'm not quite sure what the relationship between these two elements is right now.

there are also tags that don't seem to make sense, e.g. elevation in square kilometers.

lastly, the user who removed the name:en tag has done the same for many more places in the region - do you by any chance have means of reverting those as well?

thanks!
saikabhi (2017-08-18 09:17:12+00:00): Hello,

Maybe you can try this in OSMCha: https://tinyurl.com/ycmytk5m  and go through all his edits where he deleted the name:en tags. Thanks.

Abhishek
Øukasz (2017-08-20 11:43:23+00:00): Thanks again,

is there a way to have OSMCha (or other tool) show me changesets by this user where name:en tags were deleted or altered?
PT-53 (2019-02-08 07:42:10+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
kennst Du schon das QS-Tool keep right?
keep right zeigt für dieses Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515505218 hier einen Dich betreffenden Hinweis an:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=87608496
Im Raum RV gibt es etliche andere Hinweise:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.80367&lon=9.64335&zoom=12&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C193%2C195%2C196%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C20
Vielleicht hast Du ja Lust ein paar Hinweise zu erledigen.
Grüße
Øukasz (2017-09-30 11:04:10+00:00): shouldn't this be primary road?
Jame Thomas (2017-08-22 16:22:05+00:00): Tagondaing
Wladich (2017-09-27 13:27:12+00:00): Скажите, по каким данным вы добавили пруд http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515512477 ?
На снимке его нет и на mapillary тоже:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=sAEhP5nrZdMbLxVwbbMVNA&focus=photo
Felis Pimeja (2017-09-27 17:53:33+00:00): http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/WC5VNomFxwO8NJHmpSaHqQ/photo
На снимке справа.
Wladich (2017-09-27 18:04:00+00:00): То что на снимке, находится к югу от тропы  и в лесу, а не к северу на поляне. На бинге кое-как видно под деревьями
Felis Pimeja (2017-09-28 07:54:42+00:00): Ok. Буду там гулять, проверю.
highflyer74 (2017-11-09 13:29:36+00:00): Moin Lukas! Kannst Du Dir mal eben dieses Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367820297 ansehen? Da scheint etwas schief gelaufen zu sein... Sichtbar ist das auch noch hier http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=6.67127&lat=53.58466&zoom=18. Gruss aus HB!
user_3022894 (2017-11-09 16:14:37+00:00): Oh, ja da stimmt. Wobei ich mich gerade wundere, dass mir das nicht vorher aufgefallen ist. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe es jetzt so korrigiert, dass es passen müsste. Viele Grüße, Lukas
R0bst3r (2017-08-14 17:07:56+00:00): Hallo Noergel,
ich bin mir nicht sicher ob Fahrräder etc dort lang dürfen, aber suchst du vielleicht die Tagsm um den Zustand zu beschreiben und um normale Fahradfahrer vom Benutzen der Wege abzuhalten?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Mountain_biking

Grüße, R0bst3r
Noergel (2017-08-14 17:37:25+00:00): Hallo. Vielen Dank für die Info. Es handelt sich bei dem Weg um einen reinen Wanderweg, der auch nicht von Mountainbikern befahren werden soll. Falls ich also etwas falsch eingetragen haben sollte, bitte ich um Korrektur von einem Profi. Liebe Grüße Noergel
R0bst3r (2017-08-14 18:40:59+00:00): Dann lassen wirs einfach mal so, Fahrradfahrer (und KFZ) werden dort auf jeden Fall nicht mehr lang geroutet und werden die letzten Meter zur Höhle zu Fuß gehen müssen ;)
zors1843 (2017-08-16 05:42:28+00:00): Können Sie bitte mehr Auskünfte geben ?
Danke.
zors1843 (2017-08-17 06:04:47+00:00): Misplaced/unexisting casino removed
SomeoneElse (2017-08-14 11:21:36+00:00): Thanks
zstadler (2017-10-02 17:17:50+00:00): Thanks for the correction!
Marc_ch (2018-07-28 21:45:56+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385402045
you change some way from highway=construction to highway=tertiary meaning that the construction if finish one year before the opening date
that the true meaning you want ?
Melandron (2018-07-29 18:54:33+00:00): Only the bridge is under construction. The streets have been there for a long time and they are just partially closed because of the construction site. But the street itself is not under construction.
ahsmith (2017-08-14 19:36:08+00:00): This no longer exists
mrgeolikesmaps (2017-08-15 10:16:21+00:00): Please provide more information, as I've been onsite and have surveyed the site. 

It does exist.
Mammi71 (2019-11-21 20:55:47+00:00): Hallo da-sch,
bei deinen Verklebereien  von landuses hast Du fälschlicherweise den trunk mit highway=* bzw. railway verklebt, die eine layer-Ebene darunter liegen. Way verschiedener Ebenen sollten nicht mit einem gemeinsamen Knoten verbunden werden. Kannst Du das bitte wieder korrigieren? Danke
lleung (2017-08-28 06:03:28+00:00): 临时性的地标没有必要加入OSM了，依赖OSM的各种地图服务的更新通常都数月甚至更久
mueschel (2017-08-22 18:36:05+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515538457
All of the tags despite highway=path are no tags that are common in OSM. 

Jan
freeExec (2017-08-15 09:07:43+00:00): Нужно убрать имя - это не имя собственное.
Так же никаких особых запретов там нет, поэтому access теги, в частности bicycle там тоже не нужны.
village (2017-09-10 15:13:05+00:00): die Wege
way/278081212
way/403331971
way/403331973
way/403331976
sind wichtig, da sie die logische Verbindung zwischen dem zur Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30245574 gehörenden Fußweg darstellen!
village (2017-09-10 15:15:19+00:00): Ich habe deshalb diese 4 Änderungen revertiert
laznik (2017-09-26 19:11:07+00:00): Hi Domcsi, I have a question about the Marianska cesta relation:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7410493
You used tag "operator" with value "Klub slovenských turistov". However, the ref value that is used for this relation is not expected KST trail ID. Also KST would not use (AFAIK) osmc:symbol = "blue:white:::M:blue". They would mark trails with symbol like "blue:white:blue_bar"

Could you please clarify what's up? Maybe there are two parallel trails, one marked with bars and another marked with letter "M"?
Hjart (2017-08-15 20:02:16+00:00): Historikken siger at campingpladsen her sidst blev redigeret for 4 år siden, så du har nok bare overset den.
dgitto (2017-08-17 15:04:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OS:. Ma quel torrente salto del corvo, (l'ho tracciato fino alla foce e anche declassato da river a stream) dove va a finire? diventa sotterraneo?
Sascha Di Bartolo (2017-08-17 15:55:15+00:00): Ciao dgitto. Quello che hai tracciato tu non so se é il salto del corvo, credo che sia l'ex torrente pietrafucile ricoperto dalla lava del 28. Quello che ho tracciato io é il salto del corvo, il tratto in superficie si trova nella frazione di Nunziata nel tratto tra Via Fontanelle e Via Nocelle. É un torrente che scorre perennemente, anche in piena estate. Sì sotterra dopo la via Nocelle, non si sa dove va a finire...
dgitto (2017-08-18 14:09:02+00:00): Fai tu che sei della zona. sulla carta tecnica regionale 1:10000 e sull'IGM (da cui però non copiamo) si chiama così.
poi io ho solo continuato il tratto che avevi inserito e nominato tu. Ciao
Andreas Binder (2017-08-15 06:54:21+00:00): Oh je, Du nimmst verschiebst Wege/Objekte aufgrund der Bing-Lufbilder. Bing ist nicht besonders Lagegenau. Wenn Du mit Bavaria DOP 80cm oder GPS-Tracks arbeitest, siehst Du, dass die Weg/Objekte schon an der richtigen Stelle gewesen wären und jetzt falsch liegen.
maraf24 (2017-08-16 14:17:37+00:00): Jest to tzw. przeciągnięcie punktu. 
To się bardzo łatwo naprawia w JOSMie.
Tu jest sprawca: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50954908 :)
trigpoint (2017-08-14 18:05:01+00:00): Should this be tagged as tourism=guesthouse?
SK53 (2019-01-25 13:38:36+00:00): A lot of these tree rows look like ordinary hedges to me.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-14 08:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52030247 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imaginery mapping in Davis.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1480
Fabe56 (2021-07-22 13:24:04+00:00): Pour la Potale N.D. de Foy 1649, je n'ai malheureusement pas pris note des inscriptions, mais j'avais relevé à cet emplacement une colonne avec le Buste de Benjamin Devigne, monument également évoqué ici : http://www.dinant.be/patrimoine/celebrites/art-&-culture/devigne-benjamin
southglos (2017-08-14 17:18:45+00:00): As per OS map?  As in an old, out-of-copyright OS map, or a current, copyright, whatever-you-do-don't-copy-from-this-into-Openstreetmap map?
Steve Mapping (2017-08-14 19:36:42+00:00): May be it wasn’t very clear with what I said. 
I walked the path this morning following the footpath marker signs and the field boundary at the south end was crossed at a stile & a gate at the north end. This agreed with the OS map 2016. The path already marked on open street map did not seem to existed. 
I only add footpaths that I have walked as footpaths on OS map can be wrong or not as they are on the ground now.
southglos (2017-08-14 22:50:09+00:00): Cheers.  Just paranoid about details being copied from OS maps.
DavidKewley (2017-08-15 03:03:27+00:00): It looks like you named the building after the nearby street. Was that a mistake?
yurasi (2017-08-16 23:07:41+00:00): I've deleted the name. Could you please add the correct name in this building?
DavidKewley (2017-08-17 03:25:26+00:00): I'd like to add a name, but I'm unlikely to drive by any time soon. At least now it doesn't have a name that's probably incorrect. Thanks!
yurasi (2017-08-17 23:03:13+00:00): Thanks to you DavidKewley :)
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Alecs01 (2017-08-16 15:45:45+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, per indicare che è il municipio manca il tag che lo descrive, il nome non basta, l'ho aggiunto: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall. Sei sicuro dell'indirizzo? sul sito del comune è riportato un'altro (Piazza della Famiglia 1) http://www.comune.casto.bs.it/
Constable (2017-08-19 13:25:49+00:00): ciao, guarda che entrambi gli edifici che hai aggiunto risultano sovrapposti ad una strada; siccome in zona non ci sono passaggi sotto edifici, o la strada o gli edifici sono mappati male; riesci a far si che le due cose non si sovrappongano?
grazie
Constable (2017-08-20 16:31:43+00:00): ho visto che hai coretto; grazie
Marcopiu (2017-08-21 15:08:06+00:00): Grazie a te,però noto che con il cambiare mappa la cartografia si sposta, cercerò di mantenere la posizione precisa con altri riferimenti.
Constable (2017-08-21 17:10:56+00:00): ciao, si quello è un bel problema, sopratutto con le ultime immagini di Bing (aggiornate qualche mese fa), le immagini risultano disallineate e non è raro trovare qualche mappatore che aggiunge o allinea gli oggetti della mappa a quelle immagini, cosa che è da evitare a tutti i costi.
L'ideale sarebbe usare JOSM come editor e far affidamento sulle immagini del pcn (geoportale nazionale) che sono quelle più affidabili dal punto di vista dell'allineamento. Con l'editor dal broswer spesso le immagini di Mapbox risultano migliori di quelle di Bing, quindi sei sei in dubbi tra le due fai affidamento su Mapbox, in alternativa, se sei vicino a qualche strada/sentiero percorso da biciclette fa molto comodo usare le tracce gps di Strava  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Data_Permission_-_Allowed_for_tracing.21
PT-53 (2019-12-28 12:00:13+00:00): Hallo jeka p,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz auch die Radweg-Relation "Radroute L25" überarbeitet.
Die Radroute führt u.a. über diese Brücke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124611092/history
die seit 18.08.2013 u.a. das Merkmal
construction=yes
trägt. Dadurch wird die Brücke bei manchen Nayis für das Fahrrad-Routing gesperrt, wie
z.B. bei OSRM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=47.47482%2C9.85246%3B47.47408%2C9.85665#map=15/47.4733/9.8491

Du hast als Quelle Survey angegeben. Bist Du dabei auch über diese Brücke gekommen und kannst bestätigen, das diese passierbar und das Merkmal construction=yes nicht mehr zutreffend ist.

Fragende Grüße
jeka p (2020-01-02 18:38:33+00:00): Hallo PT,

danke für den Hinweis. Die Brücke ist ganz normal befahrbar. Habe ausgebessert.

SG,
Jeka
opendcc (2017-08-14 19:21:35+00:00): Ah, Du warst heute dort ...
geow (2017-08-14 21:03:29+00:00): Yep, nach der Tour auf Zwölferkopf und Hochlerch habe ich im Wössener Bach gekneippt und dann den Kurpark verschönert. Die Zeinei Hüttn ist übrigens so eine Art Gartenhaus (3x4 m) mit 2 Tischen davor, also wie vermutet leider KEIN Biergarten ;)
Gruß
Klaus
opendcc (2017-08-16 06:56:17+00:00): Da hätte man doch klingeln können und sagen: hier ist ein Biergarten eingetragen, bitte bringen Sie mir eine Halbe und die Brotzeitkarte :-)
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:02:17+00:00): hey app64 welcome to osm, I appreciate your interest in mapping, but I notice that you have added mine, this doesn't seem to appear in any of the imageries. could you specify the exact source? have a nice day
app64 (2017-08-16 10:28:05+00:00): Hey oormilavinod. I added this inoperative amethyst mine because I've been there in 2016. This inoperative mine is near to "chaika" rock in the sea and approx. 200 m to the west from the end of the local road. There is road sign on the road Umba-Varsuga in place where this local road begins.
Today mine territory is reserve.
I've checked tags. It seems they are correct.
Rgds