piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2023-10-11 09:29:20+00:00): Don't blame you for the confusion. If we had sanskrit or cyrillic we'd know know to spell things. 

I'll fix it when I get back to it. I'm slowly working through an 'error' file from rendering an Australian map, Address errors were 3.3 Mb .. now down to 2.7 Mb most of them were capitation error that were easy and quick to fix. These types are messy and time consuming.
cleary (2023-10-11 09:52:24+00:00): Thanks.
tuxayo (2017-08-03 12:35:15+00:00): Attention, les chemins piétons n'étaient pas reliés entre eux ni au reste des routes
tuxayo (2017-08-03 12:43:02+00:00): Ce qui était désastreux pour le routage: https://i.imgur.com/SjKcqrm.png
Zverik (2015-06-27 20:25:12+00:00): Привет! Ты не помнишь, случайно, как смог сделать линию из одной точки? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355436912 Это баг в программе редактирования, его хотят исправить.
marimil (2015-06-22 21:11:53+00:00): Przepraszam, o co Ci chodzi?
Cat_XF (2015-06-22 10:43:24+00:00): Добавил просек
Я не знаю, просеки отмечаются если они не заросшие?
aceman444 (2015-06-22 20:01:58+00:00): Dobry den, ak sa zmenil nazov obchodu (a prevadzkovatel), je adresa website=www.imojobchod.sk este aktualna? Tak isto otvaracie hodiny (opening_hours). Skuste to aktualizovat. Dakujem.
derwiep (2015-06-22 11:25:45+00:00): testweise Einrichtung der Haltestellen in der Gerbstedter Straße in Eisleben; VGS Südharz mbH
Skippern (2015-06-22 17:38:53+00:00): Como voce consigo verificar isso pelo Bing? Eu so vendo um nuvem ai.
Skippern (2015-06-22 17:41:09+00:00): Esse rua quase bater com MapBox
Marcello Rocha (2015-06-22 18:06:03+00:00): Eu moro em serra dourada.
Skippern (2015-06-22 18:09:28+00:00): Nao tenho duvida isso, so que voce coloquou como fonte (imagery_used=Bing) os fotos Bing, que no local desse rua so tem nuvem, assim o fonte no verdade e ou MapBox (que quase bater certo com a rua) ou levantamento no local (voce moro la, tem trilha GPX?)
RicoElectrico (2016-11-10 22:18:15+00:00): Are these really landuse=allotments? I think this is just a field, so landuse=farmland should be used instead.

Also note that natural=wood is drawn very poorly with sharp angles and too many disjoint areas.
Сергій Дубик (2016-11-11 09:42:08+00:00): When maped these fields, I was guided by the recommendations of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments - quote "Индивидуальные земледельческие территории в пределах деревни (в целом маркируемой тегом landuse=residential), также стоит отметить как landuse=allotments. "» [Translated: Individual agricultural area within the village (in general be marked tag landuse = residential), it is also should be maped as a landuse = allotments.]
Сергій Дубик (2016-11-11 09:59:12+00:00): It was the task to map up green areas, particularly tree.
pfg21 (2015-06-22 13:23:39+00:00): переделала бы в пешеходку вдоль 52 - 54 домов :) не успел ее отрисовать.
Postmanv (2015-06-23 05:56:44+00:00): Bus stop created
TommyHollywood (2015-06-22 13:04:59+00:00): Bridge doesn't exist any more (21.06.2015)
StephaneP (2015-06-23 14:36:03+00:00): Salut ! Par curiosité, qu'est-ce que la source TSF ?
t_ja (2015-06-22 15:46:57+00:00): Ahoj, aky je vyznam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355470766 ? Nema ziadne tagy, nie je sucastou relacie, preto mi pripada zbytocne mat ju OSM databaze.
iWowik (2016-11-10 07:41:40+00:00): День добрый!
Потрясающая работа, только почему без хат? И будет ли продолжение?
Сергій Дубик (2016-11-10 08:28:10+00:00): Привет!
Спасибо, но продолжения в этом месте наверное не будет — было вдохновение и время...
user_367191 (2015-06-22 13:30:45+00:00): wrong changeset-comment...should have been: "added route NE7"
flaimo (2015-06-30 22:05:59+00:00): Ist das sinnvoll jedem Bahnsteig "Linz Hauptbahnhof" zu nennen? Die platforms sollten eigentlich eh in einer Haltestellen-Relation zusammengefasst sein. Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoller diese mit name="Bahnsteig 7/8" oder so zu taggen...
Maks_ (2015-06-22 15:25:32+00:00): Понятно что визовый центр это не консульство и не посольство, но это и не офис, и теперь на карте значка не будет.
literan (2015-06-22 21:21:15+00:00): И что из этого? И на какой карте? База данных OSM используется в десятках различных рендерерах ("картах") и навигаторах. Мапить под конкретный рендерер - страшный грех в проекте, граничащий с вандализмом. OSM - это не карта, а машинная база данных, используемая для тысяч разных задач, а такими правками вы нарушаете логику работы машины.
grin (2016-01-04 09:34:49+00:00): Just a note: when you put access=no on a node on a way it may affect a route planner for car traffic to avoid the node. You probably should use foot=no on a closed pedestrian crossing.
gileri (2015-06-22 21:31:12+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avez-vous supprimé les nœuds public_transport=stop_position ?
user_2748008 (2015-06-24 07:54:14+00:00): L'itinéraire du C17 par rue Chambort & rue de Venise est une déviation, le trajet initial est celui de la rue du 4 août 1789.
gileri (2015-06-24 17:27:03+00:00): Dans ce cas-là, pourquoi conserver les bus_stop/platform à côté de la route ?
geri-oc (2015-07-10 08:28:20+00:00): Wieso "Einbahnstraße" - da komme ich nie zurück, wenn diese ohne weiteren Anschluss endet.
HolgerJeromin (2015-06-29 15:43:11+00:00): Thanks for helping cleaning up.
I did not found a reason for CS 32117971 anyway, so i restored the huge helper line and the small parking_aisle from it. :-)
jumbanho (2015-07-12 00:58:42+00:00): Does this way have a purpose?
zimba (2015-06-23 12:03:57+00:00): Please only add cycleways as a separate way in OSM if they are cleary separated from the street and not for bicycle lanes!
thanks
zstadler (2017-03-27 13:15:04+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355535358
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:27:36+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55426979
rene78 (2015-06-22 21:16:09+00:00): danke für die poi's! ich habe sie ein wenig ergänzt.
Nakaner (2015-07-25 11:15:57+00:00): Mit dem aktuellen Tagging ist folgendes OSM-Objekt wertlos. Du musst noch weitere Tags ergänzen, ansonsten kann kein Programm damit etwas anfangen! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303753318/history
Nakaner (2015-07-25 11:20:10+00:00): Mangels brauchbarer Resultate bei der Verwendung von Suchmaschinen gehe ich davon aus, dass es sich bei diesem Objekt um ein Easteregg handelt. Hast du irgendwelche Nachweise, dass dieser Zeltplatz wirklich existiert und man dort auch zelten darf? Selbiges gilt für den Brunnen, den du als Trinkwasserquelle eingetragen hast. Ist dieser wirklich eine Trinkwasserquelle?

Sollte ich von dir in den nächsten Tagen keine Antwort erhalten, werde ich die Objekte löschen.
Gringo70 (2015-07-25 11:49:52+00:00): Hi,

das ist kein offizieller Campingplatz, aber sehr wohl ein Zeltplatz den man für, z.B. Jugendgruppen, Pfadfinder ... mieten kann.
Der Brunnen gehört dazu, und ist Wasser das man durchaus trinken kann.
Im Wald gibt es sogar Toiletten.
Gringo70 (2015-07-25 11:51:56+00:00): Ich habe selber dort schon übernachtet und kenne auch den Förster persönlich sehr gut der dort sein "Revier" hat.
Nakaner (2015-07-25 12:47:24+00:00): ok, dann schreib das am Besten als description=* dazu
malenki (2015-06-23 17:52:42+00:00): Statt der Quellenangabe "Gebäude benannt" wäre hinsichtlich das Duisburger/Christine-Schnur-Wegs ein Hinweis auf dessen Umbenennung sinnvoll gewesen:
http://www.luedenscheid.de/aktuelles/oeffentliche_bekanntmachungen/2015/Internet-Benennung_Christine-Schnur-Weg.pdf
Hiermit nachgeholt. :)
malenki (2015-06-23 17:53:10+00:00): *Duisbergweg natürlich…
Stadtbahnfan1985 (2015-06-23 18:20:09+00:00): Dankeschön,

da bin ich etwas übers Ziel hinausgeschossen.

Gut, dass du aufgepasst hast. Manchmal vergesse ich sowas leider. -.-
Stadtbahnfan1985 (2015-06-23 18:22:14+00:00): Ich habe deine source einfach mal noch bei dem Christine Schnur Weg dazugetan. Wenn sich einige User wundern, dass er nicht mehr Duisbergweg heißt. :)
malenki (2015-06-23 19:27:27+00:00): Erkenntnis ist der erste Schritt usw. :)

Danke für das source= am Weg
vichada (2015-06-22 20:22:37+00:00): Sorry wrong changeset comment!
It should be:
#hotosm-nepal-earthquake-1043

And source is:
Bing Imagery; no offset
715371 (2015-06-25 01:23:08+00:00): Man sollte IMHO Relation 4613012 löschen und statt dessen die Dokumentation im Wiki auf folgender Seite fortsetzen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Kreisstra%C3%9Fen
ndm (2015-06-22 22:25:47+00:00): Why did you delete "building=yes" -- Cabot Tower is no longer being rendered.

Changing it to building=tower I could understand :-)
inkena (2015-06-23 08:17:09+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your comment! Sorry about that - I changed it to "building=yes" again. I guess I need some more practice... ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-13 11:30:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355551971/history - what you meant here by surface=railway?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-23 20:30:13+00:00): Hello!  I think that something has gone a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355557975 - it's not actually joined at either end, so nothing will ever be able to route over it (in fact, if it's just a normal footpath by the side of the road, it's probably better just to add "sidewalk=left" (or whatever) rather than trying to add a separate footpath.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-26 13:35:59+00:00): hello, someone is deleting the work you did here; https://osmcha.org/changesets/122853480/
wille (2015-06-22 23:06:58+00:00): olá,

Creio que você está utilizando o OSM para um fim não adequado. Apesar de ser possível mapear quase tudo o que podemos ver no OSM, nossa base de dados não é adequada para mapear onde vivem gatos dessa maneira que você fez. Recomendo que utilize o geojson.io ou umap.openstreetmap.fr para esse fim.
naoliv (2015-06-22 23:04:34+00:00): O que você quer representar aqui?
sdinn (2015-06-24 16:09:05+00:00): #USAID #GWU #MapOff #hotosm-Khulna-933
sdinn (2015-06-24 16:08:52+00:00): #USAID #GWU #MapOff #hotosm-Khulna-933
SomeoneElse (2015-06-24 11:53:30+00:00): Might it be possible to be a little more descriptive with changeset comments (e.g. 'changing "service" to "source" when the previous mapper obviously meant "source=bing"') and a little more local with changesets?  This covers the whole world, so will be in everyone's "history" list - it's impossible to tell what's local just from the OSM site.
cquest (2015-06-25 06:54:18+00:00): You're right... this changeset just fixed "service=*" tags that obviously were supposed to be "source=*" tags...
robbieonsea (2015-06-23 00:33:57+00:00): Comment should have been:
"Pond and a milestone seen beside the A4136"
maraf24 (2015-06-24 10:43:01+00:00): Ktoś się skarżył na to skrzyżowanie? :)
Na pewno bylo zrobione poprawnie, tj. wg wiki. Zasadę, by rysować prawoskrętny tylko jeśli jest wysepka uważam za dyskusyjną i w tym wypadku popieram to rozwiązanie, ale:
1.należołoby w changesetcie lub note napisać, dlaczego się pojawił, by potem ktoś tego nie usunął
2.należy zmienić turn:lanes - teraz są  nieprawidłowe
3.pamiętać o sygnalizacji świetlnej, tutaj jeden prawoskręt pomija światła, a przed zmianą tak nie było.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-24 11:23:45+00:00): Tak, ktoś miał uwagi do tego skrzyżowania, ale nie pamiętam już gdzie i kiedy.
Naniosłem poprawki.
GerdP (2015-10-16 14:29:56+00:00): please review:
way 355605645 has invalid highway tag
highway=path;residential 
According to Bing it also seems to 
turn left at node 1865254801
garl (2015-10-16 16:40:16+00:00): fix it, thanks
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-23 22:46:51+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289533771 a ten adres to ma jakąś ulicę i miejscowość?
freeExec (2015-06-23 08:01:00+00:00): Подровнял :) даже на глаз видно, что криво стало http://openstreetmap.ru/#map=17/54.28643/47.26155&layer=M
Silent7 (2015-06-23 12:25:05+00:00): Привет! Не очень понял - что криво стало? Я лишь вижу, что некоторые точки на Р-178 смещены (соответственно и дороги, к ним привязанные, тоже смещены, по снимку это хорошо видно), но не помню - правил ли я их или это уже твои правки?
freeExec (2015-06-23 12:46:56+00:00): Да, вот ты как раз с утра их и подвинул. Там как раз бинг кончается, но очевидно, что дорога так не виляет.
scai (2015-06-23 19:10:56+00:00): Das gehört nicht in name=*, da es nicht der offizielle Name ist. Ich verschiebe es mal in description=*
scai (2015-06-23 19:10:18+00:00): Wie heißt dieser Friseur(laden) denn richtig?
GeoMechain (2022-01-04 09:22:41+00:00): Hello,

I notice a lot of objects tagged `hires=*` + `hires:checkdate=*` + `hires:imagery=*` https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eKT . These tags are not documented and do not correspond to mappable objects. What is the point of keeping these geometries now?
ninjamask (2022-01-05 19:23:39+00:00): Those are old boundaries of high resolution coverage areas.

Dunno if they are unused anymore. IMHO they can be deleted.
papy29900 (2015-06-23 20:47:35+00:00): Voirie communale du Chemin de Stang Kéramporiel
ndm (2015-06-23 22:15:34+00:00): Cheers for adding the building tag back -- and have fun with more mapping
Firefishy (2015-06-23 08:53:58+00:00): Great first contribution to the map! Thank you. Happy to answer anything if you have any questions.
Stereo (2015-06-23 12:16:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Do you know if the CR373 going into the village like this is correct?
tyr_asd (2015-06-24 09:59:48+00:00): I've reverted this changeset as it added a huge kink to the road network (Sackstraße). See http://imgur.com/ewg6m15 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32179119
Baza Sportiva (2015-06-23 10:31:46+00:00): Rezervari terenuri sportive!!!
Stereo (2015-06-23 12:11:03+00:00): Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge!
GerdP (2015-10-23 09:52:21+00:00): please review:
way 355705707 was tagged
highway=Innerphoolbagh
I've changed that to highway=residential.
Why do you add tags like 
full_id=w-106220
osm_id=-106220
osm_type=way ?
Luigi Piccoli (2015-06-23 10:41:45+00:00): Il percorso non esiste perché la strada è chiusa da una recinzione
literan (2015-06-23 12:02:15+00:00): ээээ.... а почему вдруг эта велостанция называется "Велобайк"? так называется вся сеть, т.е. network!
Calibrator (2015-06-23 14:51:23+00:00): Предлагаю обсудить это на форуме. Там я открыл тему по велопарковкам. Краткий ответ вым - это чтобы на карье было видно название велопроката, удобно чтобв искать ближайшую станцию этой сети чтобы сдать велосипед.
trigpoint (2015-06-23 16:19:02+00:00): Please spit your edits into sensible size areas.
Vast areas, such as this, make review of your changes by local mappers very difficult and make it look like you are trying to hide something.
Thanks
fgouget (2021-02-20 22:08:00+00:00): Bonjour,

Le champ start_date du bâtiment "Plein Ouest Bâtiment D" (68519403) n'est pas une date valide (17.5).

Que vouliez-vous dire ?

Cordialement,
Roland Pallai (2015-06-29 00:24:41+00:00): Az opposite_* érték mellé nem kell a oneway:bicycle=yes, levettem. A jelenlegi konszenzus alapján félreérthetővé teszi a dolgot. Nem mondom, hogy logikus, de ez van. :)
AndreasTUHU (2015-06-30 16:10:47+00:00): Ok, nem tudtam. Amúgy jó hogy beszélünk róla, ma megint arra jártam és észrevettem, hogy Damjanich utca felé menő biciklisáv csak a Jósika utca után alakul önálló sávvá, előtte shared_lane a Lövölde tértől. Javítom, majd nézz rá ha van időd.
Сергей Кириченко (2015-06-23 15:40:09+00:00): Она всё же больше детская, чем спортивная
literan (2015-06-24 09:56:45+00:00): ну т.е. футбольное поле для детской секции тоже предлагаете обозначать как playground?))
wojtas82 (2015-06-23 19:08:06+00:00): Ta trasa (8)nie istnieje w terenie a jedynie na mapach. Tam jest jedynie czerwony szlak wokół długiej góry.
przemas75 (2015-06-24 08:01:55+00:00): Została po Twojej zmianie sama relacja, bez jakichkolwiek tagów, można usunąć w takim razie całkowicie tę relację.
literan (2015-06-24 12:28:30+00:00): ...но хинкали там так себе ;-)
fedorvinogradov (2015-06-24 12:42:30+00:00): на вкус и цвет)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 14:01:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349601312/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
Math1985 (2015-06-23 19:25:14+00:00): Dziękuję bardzo!
Gumeg (2015-06-25 13:57:37+00:00): Знаю,что там посадили деревья, но разве площадь этих посадок такая большая? На юго-восточной стороне вашего полигона forest вообще что-то промышленно (или складское) строить собираются. Например, посмотрите снимки Яндекса. 
Кроме того почему в name лесничество? По моим сведениям никакого лесничества, как организации,  к Косино-Ухтомском нет. Да даже и если вдруг его недавно основали, то такую информацию в operator нужно ставить..
RFuser11 (2015-06-25 15:40:50+00:00): Как только я там снова окажусь (пару-тройку недель) постараюсь уточнить ваши замечания. Если вам это принципиально, можете отредактировать по своему усмотрению.
Gumeg (2015-06-26 08:24:43+00:00): Хоть и живу возле озер, но туда езжу не часто. Вы там раньше окажетесь.. Год назад видел, что посадили деревья вдоль асфальтированной дороги из Кожухово в  Руднево, но площадь не оценил, нужно пройтись. Внес несколько правок, площадь уменьшил. Тег нужно будет поставить Nature=wood, явно деревья не для промышленности, а защитные.  Буду ждать результатов вашей поездки.
EdLoach (2015-06-23 20:25:19+00:00): What was fixed exactly? Looks like you lost loads of detail, and the offshore (below MHW) tidal multipolygon.
Zverik (2015-06-24 06:34:48+00:00): Hi, I've redrawn the coastline here, because it was very innacurate, had geometrical errors and denoted things that should not be in a coastline, e.g. ditches. I've added a stream that was mapped only for some meters. As for the tidal multipolygon, it was tagged wetland=marsh and was too complex (e.g. did not include ditches, but since there were errors, it actually did) and contained parts of the sea, which were clearly not marshes. If it was tidal, it should have had different tags. I'll restore it in a minute, but it won't be accurate, so please check its boundary and tags.
EdLoach (2015-06-24 07:36:51+00:00): If it helps, the tidal area is from the mean high water (coastline) to the mean low water (admin boundary). The seawall is where the footpath runs. The land areas outside the wall - some are above water at high tide, and what you're calling ditches fill with water at high tide. Hopefully that helps.
Zverik (2015-06-24 18:13:50+00:00): Added the wetland, but may have chosen wrong tags. Wiki tells coastline should be drawn at high tide, and I'm not sure how to properly tag tidal area. It is sure not a wetland.
EdLoach (2015-06-25 07:40:11+00:00): The wiki thinks otherwise - natural=wetland, wetland=tidalflat with perhaps surface=mud - this for the tidal areas between the land. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland - this was done previously as multipolygon between the coastline (mean high water) and the admin boundary (mean low water).
EdLoach (2015-06-25 13:40:26+00:00): To be honest, I think I'm going to have to try and fix what you've done when I get chance. The coastline is complex here - just switch to OS Opendata Streetview in P2 to see how much closer the coastline was to the high tide line than before you amended it to something closer to Bing which seems to be somewhere between high and low tide.
EdLoach (2015-06-25 14:20:10+00:00): Hmmm. I see. The Highwater mark in OS Opendata Streetview is out of date, as clearly on Bing some of that area is under water. I'll consider things carefully before changing anything.
Zverik (2015-06-25 14:35:52+00:00): Thanks, please do. I was just fixing a geometry error and got caught up in the process.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-09 06:43:50+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3306185 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-09-20 10:55:26+00:00): Just checking - did you mention the change to the tagging here to the person who previously mapped it?  That way they're less likely to use the same misnamed tag in the future.
mstriewe (2015-09-20 11:51:14+00:00): I usually contact the mappers if it looks like a systematic failure (i.e. if there is more than one single location to correct). Then they will probably learn for the future and I do not need to spent the time on all the corrections. ;) In this particular case, I didn't assume that a mapper with >7000 changesets has really a misunderstanding with the tags, so I didn't bother him.
(Just out of curiosity - you are systematically checking my bicycle edits? ;) Just drop me a personal message if you are also doing QA on that topic.)
is-zUser (2017-03-19 10:00:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355759998
Hallo,
Warum sind die Grenzen der Fläche so gemappt? Was ist daneben an den Bäumen anders? Eine Fläche endet doch nicht zwangsläufig an vorhandenen Punkten.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-23 22:53:43+00:00): Dlaczego w importowanych adresach nie ma tagu addr:city:simc? Kod pocztowy też byłby mile widziany :-)
adrianojbr (2015-07-02 19:09:29+00:00): entendo que a posição anterior do semáforo era mais adequada, pois quem vem da praça do estudante (praça martinho cardoso da veiga) e vira à esquerda da antônio da veiga para a rua joinville não passa nesse semáforo. do jeito que ficou o mapa, leva a entender que precisa passar em dois semáforos para essa manobra. o que você acha, opessoa?
opessoa (2015-07-02 19:22:01+00:00): Bom, antes ele estava praticamente em frente a loja de motos.
adrianojbr (2015-07-02 19:26:52+00:00): opa, foi mal. independente de onde estava antes, eu me confundi. ele não está no cruzamento como eu imagine. está um pouco antes e, portanto, corretamente posicionado. desculpa pela confusão.
Mauro1985 (2015-07-06 19:33:20+00:00): Anche su questo changeset hai inserito alcune way senza tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355772223
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355772222
Se hai bisogno d'aiuto chiedi pure qui o nella mailing list.
wojtas82 (2015-06-23 19:04:43+00:00): Czesc,
Rozumiem, że zmieniasz cyclewaye na path ale w takiej kombinacji jak stosowałem też było poprawnie.
Pzdr
skorasaurus (2015-06-30 17:06:38+00:00): 
Hi, 

Thanks for editing although there's a barrier on it so it doesn't connect to Steelyard drive. I have corrected it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32313660
samely (2015-06-30 17:34:44+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for fixing it.
Mauro1985 (2015-07-06 19:25:46+00:00): Un utente che al secondo changeset cancella decine di nodi è sospetto; se poi il commento al changeset è "zona" e inserisci anche questa way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355774040 senza alcun tag o relazione i dubbi aumentano.
È andato storto qualcosa? Serve una mano?
GerdP (2015-10-27 18:22:31+00:00): please review : The tag highway=footway
is rarely used, I assume you meant highway=path ? Or highway=footway?
In both cases, please specify access for bicycle.
GerdP (2015-11-05 10:40:42+00:00): I've changed it to highway=footway for now.
os-emmer (2023-12-18 18:22:27+00:00): Hallo Hagman,
du hast hier vor 8 Jahren eine Relation erstellt. Ich denke, dass sollte eher eine gesamtfläche sein, die die Gebäude umschließt. Kennst du den genauen Umriss des vom THW Ortsverband Niebüll genutzten Areals?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5312061
Ich habe dazu auch einen Hinweis erstellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4022561
Superadlen (2015-09-26 10:05:27+00:00): salam pour les adresse ?
si nom de route comme Rue Zidane Freres ? ou bien le nom de cité Cité 618 Logements
freeExec (2015-06-24 10:26:55+00:00): Тегом highway	=living_street обозначаются только жилые улицы имеющие соответственный знак.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=living%20street
flohoff (2015-06-24 14:46:19+00:00): Hi,
steht da an dem weg wirklich ein "Pferdeverbotsschild"? 

Du hast da ein horse=no draufgepackt - wundert mich.

Flo
drahreg01 (2015-06-25 04:19:33+00:00): Sorry, ich bin neu hier und kenne mich mit den Gepflogenheiten nicht aus. Nein, dort steht kein Pferdeverbotsschild. Kannst du das ändern?
Drah