piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
maraf24 (2017-11-06 22:38:16+00:00): Proszę sobie poczytać:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:02:51+00:00): Hi keimo, is this possibly an undiscussed automated or mechanical edit? It seems you replaced addr:staircase with addr:unit, but these are likely describing different situations, and I believe here (5 building levels) it is much more likely that addr:staircase applies rather than addr:unit.
SomeoneElse (2017-11-07 01:34:11+00:00): Oops - I think you've uploaded the "learnosm" test data into the middle of the Atlantic.  Don't worry - I'll delete it.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
JJIglesias (2017-11-07 00:08:38+00:00): Slds Enrique poner UE en el Nombre del Colegio pues es parte de la denominacion del Ministerio de Educacion; seguidamente se pone el Nombre Identificativo del Colegio; osea UE El Carmen, el Operator NO ES el Nombre propio del Colegio. OSM busca por nombres, si a todas las escuales les pones UNIDAD EDUCATIVA, jamas podra buscar algo especifico. Por favor CONSULTA antes de poner algo que para ti parece "normal" pero que es un DESASTRE en el mapa.
Saludos
JJ
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
geodreieck4711 (2017-11-07 06:37:45+00:00): Komentare deiner Bearbeitungen wären esentiell!!!
Allroads (2017-11-06 22:27:48+00:00): Wat was er niet goed aan de ligging van de weg?
Ik had de weg uitgelijnd op basis van Luchtfoto actueel en BGT omtrekgericht en dan op het midden van de weg gelegd.
Martin Borsje (2017-11-07 06:17:44+00:00): niets wezenlijks aan gewijzigd.
Allroads (2017-11-07 08:31:16+00:00): ligt nu niet meer midden op de weg. Nu is het kwalitatief minder en dat vindt ik toch wel een punt.
Als het niet wezenlijks is waarom blijf je er dan niet van af.
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:07:37+00:00): This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.
JJIglesias (2017-11-07 00:17:23+00:00): Slds Enrique, Primero NO se escribe en Mayusculas en el Mapa; segundo poner UE en el Nombre del Colegio pues es parte de la denominacion del Ministerio de Educacion; seguidamente se pone el Nombre Identificativo del Colegio; osea UE El Carmen. El Operator NO ES el Nombre propio del Colegio. OSM busca por nombres, si a todas las escuelas les pones UNIDAD EDUCATIVA, jamas podra buscar algo especifico. Por favor CONSULTA antes de poner algo que para ti parece "normal" pero que es un DESASTRE en el mapa.
Saludos
JJ
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:56:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your park and forrest (natural=wood) area overlaps. Also the forest area overlaps herself.
maxolasersquad (2017-11-07 22:27:44+00:00): Doesn't the park cover the area south of here up to Brockton Way?
PierZen (2017-12-10 14:00:44+00:00): Échangengeur Dorval en reconstruction
Ce changeset a effacé des chemins existants pour ensuite les re-créer a partir d'image satellite. A noter que l'on n'efface pas les chemins pour les recreer, sinon nous perdons historique des modifications. les chemins effacés étaient corrects et on devra faire un revert de ce changeset.
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-13 00:29:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by one or multiple of the following changesets: 53566018

The reason for the revert is: Revert addition of road reference numbers to name tags. This revert only edits name tags. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:04:36+00:00): this is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit it seems.
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:51:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:07:05+00:00): This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.
anu_bala (2019-04-17 02:12:27+00:00): Hi Dion Qairanwan,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across
"way 538837985"
classified as un-classified. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-09 14:40:15+00:00): Não se gruda áreas com vias como fez na Laticinios Rio Verde
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:50:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way.

If you need help: You are welcome.
mueschel (2017-11-07 09:47:42+00:00): Hi,
all these objects have many foreign tags, which seem to be imported from an external database and should not appear in OSM, like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538840834

This data can not be found on the source you stated - what is the actual source of this data and does it comply with OSM's ODbL?

Jan
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-07 15:16:56+00:00): I think we should revert it immediately because there are also intersecting buildings:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538473003
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538841878

@mueschel: do you want to do it or should we inform the DWG?
naoliv (2017-11-07 15:58:54+00:00): Clearly an undiscussed (and messy) import.
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
MKnight (2017-11-07 10:21:22+00:00): Gibt es die Schule nicht mehr?
Holger-erf (2017-11-07 18:28:11+00:00): Hallo MKnight,
schön das du bei OSM in Weimar die Augen offen hälst und schaust, was hier so passiert.
Die Diesterwegschule ist in den Sommerferien diesen Jahres von der Windmühlenstraße in die Bonnhoeferstraße gezogen. Vor einigen Wochen habe ich die Schule in der Bonnhoeferstraße 46 eingetragen. Das ist aber verkehrt. Leider hatte ich da eine falsche Info bekommen. Jetzt habe ich nämlich erfahren, dass die Diesterwegschule mit in die Staatliche Grundschule „Lucas Cranach“ ebenfalls in der Bonnhoeferstraße mit eingezogen ist. Daher habe ich den Schul-Node in der Bonnhoeferstraße 46 wieder gelöscht.
Ciao Holger
MKnight (2017-11-07 19:28:35+00:00): Bei meiner Webrecherche ist mir die Diskrepanz zwischen 26 und 46 (auch) nicht aufgefallen, deswegen hab ich gefragt, nun ist mir das klar, danke.
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-06 21:22:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53522831, 53522890, 53523027, 53523247, 53523469.
JJIglesias (2017-11-07 00:21:25+00:00): Slds Enrique, Primero NO se escribe en Mayusculas en el Mapa; segundo poner UE en el Nombre del Colegio pues es parte de la denominacion del Ministerio de Educacion; seguidamente se pone el Nombre Identificativo del Colegio; osea UE El Carmen. El Operator NO ES el Nombre propio del Colegio. OSM busca por nombres, si a todas las escuelas les pones UNIDAD EDUCATIVA, jamas podra buscar algo especifico. Por favor CONSULTA antes de poner algo que para ti parece "normal" pero que es un DESASTRE en el mapa. 
Saludos 
JJ
Olga | Yanosik (2020-10-08 10:26:06+00:00): Demolek, zmieniłam organizację ruchu zgodnie z aktualnymi śladami, jednak wydaje mi się, że część jedni, które są juz nieczynne powinny być usunięte, bo nie pasują do docelowego układu, który rysowałeś. Jako, że rysowałeś docelową organizację czy możesz zerknąć na to skrzyżowanie i usunąć co niepotrzebne? Chodzi mi zwłaszcza o miejsce styku Granitowa/Krygiera/Zakręt. Dziękuję :)
d3mol3k (2020-10-08 18:01:42+00:00): Dobra to co mogłem i widziałem jak to wygląda teraz pousuwałem Jak byś mogła podesłać mi zrzut śladów to zobaczyłbm co i jak to wygląda z tym co zmieniłaś. Dzięki
JJIglesias (2017-11-07 00:22:04+00:00): Este Cambio SI ESTA CORRECTO...
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:08:55+00:00): This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:49:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A parking lot doen’t have a name „Parking lot“, this is a description. And the right description of parking lot ist emneity=parking (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking for details)
SomeoneElse (2017-11-06 23:24:46+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538844018 which is an almost exact duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538716681 added just 11 hours previously.
As I said in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1616 , please take a little more care as you're adding things.
Best Regards,
Andy
freebeer (2019-01-08 00:13:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66112938 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle with personal private information that should not appear in osm
Geofreund1 (2019-06-05 15:02:06+00:00): Hallo Seetroll,
könntest du bitte mal Gebäude und Hausnummer 65 in der Reutestraße prüfen. Da ist etwas doppelt eingetragen.
vam_002 (2019-04-23 03:37:44+00:00): Hi  DionQairawan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 538851315
way 538851312 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
GerdP (2017-11-07 07:26:59+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing used on a way. This tag is meant for the node shared by the footway and the major road, the footway itself should be tagged highway=footway + footway=crossing. 
Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53573818. 
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Jan Wilts (2017-11-08 10:00:17+00:00): You're right, I'm sorry...
GerdP (2017-11-08 10:01:58+00:00): You're welcome! Thanks for the feedback :-)
Piskvor (2017-11-07 10:01:30+00:00): Dobrý den,
ty odbočovací pruhy na Wilsonově byly špatně, nebo proč bylo třeba je smazat? (Používají je navigace, např. OsmAnd)

Btw tohle je Nové Město, ne Staré ;)
NyanSten (2017-11-07 13:07:43+00:00): Bohužel s tou navigací nefungovaly. Ten levý pruh je pro odbočování do U Divadla, ale také do Vinohradské, a navigace zde radila, že je potřeba jet v přímých pruzích a do levého navigovala až za křižovatkou, kam už se ve špičce často nedá dostat. Odstraněním pruhů zde navigace ukazuje pruhy z další křižovatky (s Vinohradskou). Nevím, jak lépe to řešit, možná nějakou relací?
NyanSten (2017-11-07 13:09:35+00:00): Stejného problému jsem si teď všiml i na dvojici křižovatek s Washingtonovou a s Václavským náměstím, pravý pruh na Wilsonově je pro odbočování do obou.
Piskvor (2017-11-08 11:39:30+00:00): Tam jsem to tedy upravil na stav slight_right;right. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345621907
JJIglesias (2017-11-07 00:37:54+00:00): Solo se pone en Mayusculas las Abreviaciones como UE y Luego la primera letra de cada palabra en el nombre. NUNCA Todo en Mayusculas. en este caso: UE 29 de Marzo, tampoco se usan comillas "abc"
Russ McD (2018-10-28 01:09:26+00:00): Way 538858336 - This is NOT residential... Yes, the west end might be, but the eastern section runs through fields, and is clearly unpaved.
https://i.postimg.cc/x8L8ZHDD/20181026-104559.jpg
Please make that little bit of extra effort to split the ways and tag each section accordingly, which might at least prevent routing engines from using the way.
As per usual, I'll fix it for you.
RVR001 (2019-03-05 23:46:30+00:00): Thank you Russ for clarifying with your ground truth sources and changing the classification.
opendcc (2017-11-07 03:36:22+00:00): Hello,

please look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Thank you
Supaplex (2018-01-21 02:43:04+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Johnny Mapperseed (2017-11-07 00:19:00+00:00): I accidentally used the saved changeset comment in iD. This was actually an armchair edit using Bing Sat Imagery without a ground survey. Sorry for the error!
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:45:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-12-18 11:16:49+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have added a walmart ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538863956 ), great! But, one thing. In OSM we usually put addresses in full. So instead of "S Suncoast Blvd" it's better to spell it out full, so "Boulevard" instead of "Blvd", and if that "S" means "South", then put that in.

So "South Suncoast Boulevard" is best.

It's easy for someone, or a computer, to turn "South" into "S", but it's hard to be sure that "S" means "South". After all, does "St" mean "Street" or "Saint"? 🙂
GeoidDude (2019-03-20 21:18:43+00:00): "Hello Thunder08, do you know if traffic can continue south along Леонтовича вулиця past Велика Арнаутська вулиця?"
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:36:24+00:00): Welocme to OSM! The barrier must by part of the highway (I changed it). You can also mark the private part of the street with access=private.

I you need help: You are welcome!
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:05:17+00:00): Thank you for the fixes. Looks good to me.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:05:00+00:00): Thank you for the fixes. Looks good to me.
Russ McD (2018-10-27 06:45:00+00:00): Ways 538867897 & 98 : 
Dear Yoko, as per your profile comment, Im "reaching out to you" and asking what on earth possessed you to tag this as a residential road, and paved by default. Those rooftops you see are field shelters for the workers in the rice paddies, and the building at the south end is a garage.
Here is a photo taken about 200 mts in, travelling North;
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Rw6YK6U4oe4Vucn67
and here in another 200 mts;
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ntTRzvTSd6wrh28J8
Does this look like you can drive your family Ford Focus down here ?
There is not a house nearby.
Your edits have completely bolloxed our navigation in Thailand, and one year on, these "residential roads through the fields" are still uncorrected.
Why don't you man-up, admit your mistakes, and go back and correct every one of your edits like this, instead of dropping it in the laps of us local mappers to sort our your crap imports.
Russ McD.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:06:29+00:00): It seems there are still some random walls in this area
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:07:15+00:00): Hi, you've added an area=yes :(
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538868405
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:09:05+00:00): You've added area=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538871946
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538871945
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538871943
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538871944
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538871942
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:10:45+00:00): area=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538874614
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:29:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your change set comment doen’t match with your changes! Is there really a oneway??
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:13:18+00:00): Please fix area=yes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538876003
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-07 06:14:26+00:00): Please fix area=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538876136
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538876139
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538876137
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538876138
zon2008 (2017-11-07 03:11:35+00:00): Thankyou
yellowsoar (2019-05-10 16:50:35+00:00): 這個點是不存在嗎？ 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4697345994/history
catdreamer (2019-05-10 23:48:17+00:00): 是的，同一帳號沿線添加的shelter，經踏查後發現不存在。只先取消tag。
yellowsoar (2019-05-28 12:30:21+00:00): 這是 life cycle 的部分，應該使用 demolished: 前綴，參考 OSM Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53684043 where the changeset comment is: [Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya] cleanup of broadcasting-related edits, add buildings and landuse, modify street
John Castillo Soberano (2017-11-07 03:42:10+00:00): soon
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53684043 where the changeset comment is: [Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya] cleanup of broadcasting-related edits, add buildings and landuse, modify street
vam_002 (2019-04-29 04:00:39+00:00): "Hi FickyAdityaRomansya,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 539779516
way 539779513
way 538918473
way 538918472
way 539779094
way 538885217 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 06:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53683863 where the changeset comment is: [Santiago, Isabela] cleanup of broadcasting-related edits, modify POI tags
mueschel (2017-11-14 11:26:05+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? I can't make any sense out of the tags.

Thanks
Jan
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:20:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your cahngeset, because you added duplicate objects (one in the same building and one a wrong place add to a traffic light).
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 05:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53683039 where the changeset comment is: [Matalahib, Quezon City] remove misleading/inaccurate label for a broadcasting-related facility
Nakaner (2017-11-07 21:13:03+00:00): Hi sammuell,

I am not sure if this changeset is really helpful. I don't see any similarities between the forest you uploaded and the forest outlines which one could trace from Bing, Mapbox, ESRI or the DigitalGlobe layers. How did you ensure that the CanVec data is better than all available imagery?

Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.71504/-95.33917

Best regards

Michael
sammuell (2017-11-08 00:37:26+00:00): Hi Michael

Oops, I looks like I accidentally moved a large way, so that's why it looks out of place. I fixed it and it should all be better now. Thanks for catching that.

To be clear though, this is not an import, it is a replacement of Canvec data with traced data, because there are some issues with the Canvec forest data in this particular place. It is a work in progress and will take some time, so if you check out other areas of the Whiteshell it should be obvious why I'm doing the replacement.

Sam
John Castillo Soberano (2017-11-07 04:39:52+00:00): News
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 05:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53682665 where the changeset comment is: [Guadalupe Viejo, Makati] revert addition of fake radio stations by "John Castillo Soberano"