piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
philippec (2016-07-11 12:51:56+00:00): I did not find "summer" on the osm wiki, so I made note for it.
mueschel (2016-07-11 13:12:48+00:00): There are several options, all are not perfect:

- amenity=shower;drinking_water - I don't know any tool supporting that
- two nodes next to each other - not the reality, but all tools and users can cope with it
- two nodes on the same spot - fine for tools, not very handy for editors

Yes, "summer" is not defined, but free text is allowed, e.g. opening_hours = "in summer". This makes it clear to tools that it is some kind of opening hours and can be shown to the user in the appropriate place.
user_6110846 (2017-10-18 08:41:25+00:00): Так як Вами зроблено у Амвросіївці так не робиться. Вами гаражі завандалено. Landuse то є теґ  для обмалюванн я території. Тому заміна building на landuse  э вандалызм по причины порушенн ятехнологыъ картографування. Надалі прохання читати вікі-правила. wiki-openstreetmap / У рядку пошук можна набрати гараж гаражи и відобразить ся  сторінка з схемою теґів.     Для початківців маперів є зібрання комбінацій http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить#.D0.A1.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D0.B9
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
muzirian (2017-03-11 21:01:43+00:00): object with name only, pls review
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
Supaplex (2016-07-09 11:09:51+00:00): 請問是那家便利商店呢？
mavl (2018-11-01 17:03:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
richlv (2016-07-30 23:40:08+00:00): highly unlikely that there would be an embassy here. will remove.
highflyer74 (2016-07-17 07:24:15+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. maps.me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt.

In diesem Fall stellt sich die Frage: Heisst die Bar "Amerigo Vespucci" oder "Fiedlers Kolonialladen"? Ich würde mich freuen, wenn Du Dich einmal kurz hier meldest.

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2016-07-26 17:56:02+00:00): Leider keine Antwort des Mappers, daher fixme=* hinzugefügt.
user_6110846 (2017-11-09 20:39:31+00:00): Доброго вечора 
у даних змінах Ви деякі адреси недоробили- нема вулиць .Проінвентаризуйте та виправіть будь ласка
Sergey82K (2017-11-09 20:44:12+00:00): Доброго дня!
В мене більше немає достовірних даних про номера будинків та назви вулиць.
apm-wa (2016-07-10 08:07:19+00:00): Это не Residential Area.  Residential Area обозначает жилой квартал, где люди живут.  Это промышленная зона Industrial Area.  Так же прошу Вас обозначить заправки так же как обозначены другие заправки на карте Туркменистана.
d1g (2016-11-20 11:39:12+00:00): Пожалуйста, исправьте неточность: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304978615/history - новый асфальт (smoothness=excellent) был уложен только вдоль забора http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304834451

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=25665292

Вы сделали ошибку, я её заметил и её можно исправить, сделаете одолжение?
d1g (2016-11-20 11:40:36+00:00): Я знаю наверняка что у этого пути можно отметить несколько ступенек: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430030151

Пожалуйста, исправьте это.
Gutsycat (2016-07-13 17:42:15+00:00): Не верно. Прошу откатить назад.
Sharov15 (2016-07-13 17:48:54+00:00): Не очень понял, друг. Я там живу. Что значит "не верю", готов к диалогу. )
Gutsycat (2016-07-13 17:52:38+00:00): Не верно исправлен забор ЦКС, например стоянки не входят внутрь забора. И территория выше ЦКС по карте, это другая организация.
Sharov15 (2016-07-13 18:00:33+00:00): Хм... Согласен. То что выше - это военная часть. Но это единая, нераздельная территория. За единым забором. Для путешествующих нет разницы. Забор поправлю. Но на стоянку никого не пускают. Говорят, что их территория. Впрочем... Поправлю, поправлю. Сорри.. ) Прошу прощения.
maraf24 (2016-07-09 16:26:20+00:00): Usunąłem punkt, gdyż:
1. był to duplikat - dom z adresem 29 już jest
2. zawierał dane osobowe
species (2016-07-10 19:38:51+00:00): Hallo!
Wir setzen normalerweise den Namen nicht auf die Hausnummer, es sei denn es steht irgendwo in 1m großen Buchstaben "Haus 48" am Haus drauf - die Information "48" ist ja bereits in der Adresse enthalten.

Danke,
lg
muralito (2016-07-10 02:10:37+00:00): Estimado: alpine_hut es para zonas de montaña. Probablemente quieras mapear otro tipo de alojamiento.
trigpoint (2016-07-09 15:13:08+00:00): A water well seems unlikely at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4293005389

Is this a genuine edit?
bxl-forever (2020-08-15 11:14:31+00:00): Hello,
I understand this was your first edit on OSM.
Please be aware that if you type a name on objects, it will be uploaded to the database.  As the saying goes, with great power comes great responsibility. :-)
Please do not make up names for objects.  "park" for the name of a viewpoint or "dom" for the name of a grass area look like you invented them.  We had to revert this.
mrpulley (2016-07-09 13:12:12+00:00): See discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36774727 regarding increase in layer (nearby way 39196209 is footbridge, covered by these roads, but not connecting with these roads)
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 16:28:10+00:00): Hi,
I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430051718 , and the other houses in the terrace, should be "building=house" not "building=H"?
Cheers,
Andy
confusedbuffalo (2016-07-25 17:29:59+00:00): Oops, yes it should have been, good spot.
I've now corrected it (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41018159)
DaveF (2016-07-09 17:44:33+00:00): Hi
Why have you assumed there isn't a crossing? crossing=no could be the incorrect tag. Looking at some of your edits you've taken what looks like legitimate crossing places & removed them.
alejandroscf (2016-07-13 18:01:48+00:00): Also, that crossing=no is important, marking a poit where used to be a crossing. 
I hope you are checking by survey all this changes ¿or is this an unauthorized automated edit?
gileri (2016-07-14 09:47:01+00:00): I don't see how highway=crossing and crossing=no would work together, apart from temporarily forbidden crossing.

But leaving crossing=no alone seems weirder.
Wynndale (2016-07-14 11:50:17+00:00): The point about trolltags is that it isn’t the trolltag  itself (here crossing=no) that misleads data consumers; rather the problem is with the tag that it compromises that consumers shouldn’t have to see in the first place.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-14 11:58:40+00:00): For info, "trolltags" might need some explanation (it's not as offensive as it sounds):

http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35702
DaveF (2016-07-15 10:05:18+00:00): FYI I asked for the opinion of others on this forum thread:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-July/076379.html

highway=crossing & crossing=no combination is, as we all appear to agree, contradictory. And I agree with you that highway=crossing on its own is superfluous.

However, by removing it, you're assuming that it's an uncontrolled crossing. It could be light controlled but the person adding it failed to add the extra data. Without that knowledge the tags should not have been removed.

You've left crossing=no as a single tag. You have no knowledge that crossing a road at these points is impossible. Your edit has reduced the quality of the database & which I believe should be revert.

Once that's done I will ask GB users to look at those edits in their area to see if the crossing=no tag is relevant.

P.S. 'Trolltags' is a poor misnomer.
d1g (2016-09-13 15:12:23+00:00): Replied about "trolltags" arguments: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35702#comment35994
muzirian (2017-02-26 19:50:18+00:00): To add a buisness to the mall, just a new poi, dont edit the polygon of the whole mall.
Revderting changes and adding poi now, move and add details on openstreetmap.org
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-16 15:33:51+00:00): Change in Vilnius reverted because it is a crap. Please read Open Street Map rules before doing random changes.
dmouhama (2018-09-29 00:01:00+00:00): Hello,This segment has been marked with PSV designated, however the mapillary show all kind of vehicles.
whb (2018-10-05 08:43:40+00:00): psv:backward=designated is correct.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29993649
There is a "no entry" sign with exception for PSV:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/IO3CgtI2yGZ8Ezc3HA0bBQ
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-29 15:33:09+00:00): skąd informacja o tym że te niemieckie nazwy są w użyciu?

możesz być zainteresowany https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-de-w-krakowie-usuwamy/134963
Piskvor (2016-07-11 08:26:55+00:00): Most je v nepravděpodobné poloze, vzhledem k tomu, že přes něj původně vedla vlečka, která vzápětí vedla po mostě přes Jižní Spojku (trať je snesená i s předávacím kolejištěm severně od mostů a spojkou na zkušební trať metra - to je ta zahnutá díra v zeleni na východě - zůstala jen pěšina, ale i mosty). Chtělo by to ověřit na místě, už roky jsem tu nebyl.
Mormegil (2016-07-11 09:07:02+00:00): Já jsem tam právě šel, ale mostu jsem si nevšiml; jsem si téměř jist, že tam není (nebo je, ale za zdí, takže není přístupný/průchozí), ale nehledal jsem ho konkrétně a mate mě, že přes něj někdo kreslil jakousi navrhovanou cyklotrasu A43.
Piskvor (2016-07-11 10:58:55+00:00): Tak tam jsou mosty DVA. Nebo možná "byly:" tady na tom videu z roku 1999 je vidět asi demontáž vlečky na tom prvním - autojeřáb jede po tom "železničním" mostě (záběr  v 10:19 začíná tady, vlak jede na západ: http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=50.06936&lon=14.52639#map=19/50.06935/14.52551 ). Jestli je tam dosud ten druhý, nevím. Navrhovaná cyklotrasa bude podle čísla zřejmě magistrátní, do OSM zanesená někým kolem prahounakole.cz (mapu renderují z OSM, na kvalitu dat dost dbají).
Piskvor (2016-07-11 11:00:19+00:00): Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fgcG9bNUo4&feature=youtu.be&t=10m19s
Mormegil (2016-07-12 07:45:52+00:00): Tak už jsem to prověřil a zkusil (trošku záplatoidně) napravit i v mapě. Opravdu jsou tam (pořád) dva mosty, jeden bývalá vlečka, ten sice existuje, ale je z obou stran zazděn, druhý pro pěší (podél něj vede i potrubí), normálně přístupný, byť ze severu poněkud skrytý vegetací. Původně jsem se nechal zmást tím, že Mapy.cz i OSM každá ukazují jeden most, jenže každá jiný (!), v OSM se nerenderoval ten železniční, protože railway=razed/abandoned se nerenderuje vůbec a samotné bridge=yes bez dalšího tagu taky ne. Takže za mě prověřeno a opraveno; tedy až na to highway=briddleway, což je podle mě naprostý úlet, ale patrně tradiční Machkovina, takže co už.
danidoedel (2016-07-10 14:28:00+00:00): Hallo,

ein paar Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen hier:
1. Du hast ein Duplikat des bereits existierenden Aldi Süds eingetragen.
2. Telefonnummern werden hier in diesem Format eingetragen: +49 9562 1234567
3. Ein Hinweis auf eine bereits geschlossene Einrichtung hilft in einer wheelchair:description wenig.

Habe diese Punkte schon alle ausgebessert. Das nächste Mal einfach darauf achten ;)
Dinkelvollkornbrot (2016-07-10 14:37:11+00:00): Hi!
Ich habe die Änderungen nicht direkt auf OpenStreetMap eingepflegt. Diese wurden durch Wheelmap.org gemacht. Ich nehme an, dass da die Schnittstelle noch nicht so besonders ausgereift ist und das deshalb zustande kommt.
Der Aldi wurde dort z.B. nicht angezeigt.
Vielleicht mal mit den Entwicklern schnacken ;-)
danidoedel (2016-07-10 17:37:25+00:00): Na gut ok dann nehm ich das natürlich wieder zurück ;)
Dinkelvollkornbrot (2016-07-10 19:14:47+00:00): ;-)
jeka p (2016-07-13 16:03:02+00:00): Hello! Please pay attantion when reversing the ways: it influences "oneway" tag and therefore destroys navigation.
I have corrected it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193364001
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430062615
highflyer74 (2016-07-17 07:26:36+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. maps.me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
dbf_ (2016-07-09 23:02:07+00:00): Пожалуйста не используйте добавления объектов в maps.me для своих личных заметок, вместо этого просто добавляйте метки.
Ялок (2016-07-09 23:09:37+00:00): Что подразумевается под словом метка
dbf_ (2016-07-09 23:30:20+00:00): Вы можете просто нажать в любое место экрана, тогда внизу повится панель где будет кнопка "Метка" (со звездой). Эта пометка будет видна только Вам. Вы же добавляете свои объекты (например, "Поворот в лево 600м пляж Костомуш"), в виде произвольных объектов (фонтан и т.п.), тем самым засоряя карту для всех участников. Подробнее о карте Вы можете прочитать тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0
mueschel (2016-07-11 11:05:58+00:00): Hi Simone,
could you check these tags?
right:footway =sidewalk
right:sidewalk =both
right:surface =asphalt
I don't understand what the "right:" means.

Cheers, Jan
simone_girardelli (2016-07-11 13:53:26+00:00): Hi mueschel, I do not speak English, use translator.

I have consulted with the Italian mailing list, and indeed you are right, give to modify by adding way for sidewalks, so as to specify taggature more specifications.

There are two other places where I have tagged so, give also there to change.

Thanks for signalling.
mueschel (2016-07-11 20:14:11+00:00): Hi,
non so l'italiano bene... :(
Penso che questa e correto (ho visto la strada su Bing)
sidewalk=right (solo a destra)
sidewalk:surface=asphalt 

Jan
simone_girardelli (2016-07-12 08:06:53+00:00): I write in Italian, in case if you don't understand, I write in english (always with the help of the translator).

Il tuo suggerimento, mi è stato proposto anche dalla mailing list italiana, però sempre nella discussione, è emerso che è meglio creare due way, perché permettono modifiche ulteriori nel tempo.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-07-09 17:16:41+00:00): Czy aby na pewno? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430070593
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-07-09 17:17:11+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430070594
Ancymon (2016-07-09 17:19:47+00:00): Dzięki za czujność :) Poprawione
d1g (2016-07-09 20:23:45+00:00): Я не исправляю ошибки потому что вижу действия dr&mx как вандализм и неуважение вклада других участников:

1. удалены теги и история объектов у
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360981964/history, не отражены в
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430071938

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360981968/history - правки Kipruss переобозначены без необходимости:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106079099/history

3. контур https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430071938 неточный даже в очевидных местах (у заборов)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-26 16:03:46+00:00): Czy po https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124092869  są jakiekolwiek ślady w terenie?
Jothirnadh (2016-09-07 04:00:08+00:00): Hello Kailashdhirwani,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, your edits are really valuable. I came across this changeset where some of the POI's added are not appropriately tagged, for example the shop's are tagged with `tourism=attraction` tag. I am sure you didn't do it intentionally but added it by mistake with the use of maps.me editor.  Can you please look into it and fix them please.

Happy mapping.

Cheers,
Jothirnadh
kailashdhirwani (2016-09-07 06:05:19+00:00): dear Jothirnadh

i done it previously also and later i changed all through web.
like Home Decor (4293395301, v1) i chaged it to hardware  please see all  i already changed all on second day
Jothirnadh (2016-09-07 10:54:52+00:00): Ohh, that's really cool. Didn't know that. Thanks for responding back.
maraf24 (2016-07-09 22:17:45+00:00): Mało prawdopodobne, by w tym miejscu był domek letniskowy. Co to miało być?
muralito (2016-07-10 02:31:12+00:00): Hola Juan.
"tourism=artwork" es para obras de arte individuales, esculturas, cosas de ese tipo.

Para galerias es tourism=gallery si son principalmente exposiciones, y shop=art si son principalmente venta de objetos.
letihu (2016-07-10 20:41:17+00:00): Was soll 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430080724/history
denn darstellen?
Buntbart (2016-07-11 09:03:40+00:00): Wasser. Danke für den Hinweis ;-)
letihu (2016-07-15 11:28:58+00:00): ;-)
adas (2016-07-18 19:54:28+00:00): Ej... co to za pas startowy w Murowańcu?
deleted_account (2016-07-18 20:12:04+00:00): Pomyłka... dzięki za sygnał
maraf24 (2016-07-09 22:18:41+00:00): Jak się nazywa ten sklep?
Klumbumbus (2016-09-11 17:05:00+00:00): Hallo,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2477771854 ist die Zwickauer nicht mit der Neefestraße verbunden. Ist das wirklich korrekt so?
VG
BassTii (2016-09-11 23:38:59+00:00): Hallo zurück,
also physisch sind die Straßen verbunden, jedoch so abgesperrt, dass eine Durchfahrt nicht möglich ist. Drum hab ich das einfach nur so eng zusammen gelegt.
Schönen Wochenstart
BassTii
Klumbumbus (2016-09-12 10:56:01+00:00): Danke. Habe einen Hinweis in den Daten hinterlegt.
user_5359 (2016-07-10 16:40:03+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die drei Fusswege im Innenhof (mit der Nummer 430085129 bis ..131 solltest Du schon bis zum Haus zeichnen und doch den Eingang ins Haus mit entrance=yes kennzeichnen. Ich gehe mal davon, dass kein offener Durchgang existiert (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage)
user_5359 (2016-07-10 06:35:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If the building is an active church, please add amenity=place_of_worship to the building. Read more under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
Ewen Hill (2016-07-10 02:40:26+00:00): Thanks for updating this. There was a fair amount of work going on about a year around Birchip from memory but it does appear confusing and it may have been abandoned at the western end. I wanted to get the outline in whilst it was still clearly visible. For major infrastructure, there is not a lot written about it.
user_870861 (2016-08-06 11:56:04+00:00): there is a large number of exactly duplicated ways and node
(buildings, roads, barriers, street_lamp, stops ...)
with your changesets :
41224595 vs 40403208 or 40618846 or 40978488
41243789 vs 40403208 or	40618846 or 40978488 or 41224595
SomeoneElse (2016-07-11 16:10:14+00:00): Hello, is the website here correct?  It looks just like the generic NTS one.
jmdd (2016-07-15 18:20:48+00:00): The webseite is the main site of NTS. The site of Georgian Site is:
http://www.nts.org.uk/Property/Georgian-House/

I changed it
SomeoneElse (2016-07-17 09:35:44+00:00): Thanks.
Rom1 (2016-07-11 21:06:19+00:00): Encore moi !
J'ai changé les valeurs que tu avais mises en "ref" vers "description". Au tag "ref" on attend plutôt une valeur numérique. Ou alors il faudrait un tag ref spécifique comme ceux détaillés à http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref?uselang=fr
gendy54 (2016-07-11 21:16:56+00:00): J'ai mis ref à tous les commissariats et gendarmerie du 54 et du 35... Dans le fichier Etalab, il parle de service et mettent les mêmes infos que moi dans ref. Par contre, pour un ref spécifique, je vois pas.
Rom1 (2016-07-12 07:11:50+00:00): A partir de ces données http://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/liste-des-points-d-accueil-de-la-gendarmerie-nationale-avec-geolocalisation/ ? Je ne vois pas de champ ref et service correspond bien à la description des différents point d'accueil de la gendarmerie. Pour un ref spécifique, cela pourrait être quelque chose comme http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:RTE_nom
ququruzka (2020-12-08 13:16:55+00:00): нхя ты портишь данные ?
ElliottPlack (2016-09-12 20:07:58+00:00): Nice work! I see you're adding the bicycle = yes tag, correct?
maraf24 (2016-07-09 22:29:59+00:00): A kiedy miała miejsce zmiana numeracji, bo w portalu gminnym wciaż jest nr 14?
http://kocmyrzowluborzyca.e-mapa.net?x=575804&y=257783&zoom=13&group=2,3,23,5&service=3,4,5,20,21,24,26,9,10,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,44,45,46,47&alllayers=4,5,20,21,24,26,65,7,8,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,9,36,37,38,39,40,43,44,45,46,47,52,53,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63&layer=3,41001,42001
trigpoint (2016-07-10 08:49:53+00:00): Please can you explain what railway:etcs means and how a local mapper can verify it on the ground?
SomeoneElse (2016-07-10 08:52:40+00:00): Also, what is the licence associated with the "Sectional Appendix" that you refer to here?
Sadie B (2016-07-10 09:12:15+00:00): Railway:ETCS refers to the Safety system on this route ETCS Level 2. The Sectional Appendix (showing the boundrys and what safety system is published under open data on the Network Rail site. 

To verify on the ground look for blue signs with arrows pointing at the track.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-10 09:22:12+00:00): Where's the licence associated with that data?  At http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/1344.aspx I just see "Unless otherwise stated, we are the owner or the licensee of all intellectual property rights (designs, logos, etc) in our site, and in the material published on it. Those works are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All such rights are reserved." which doesn't sound very open at all.

Also http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/12275.aspx doesn't suggest that ECTS is in use at all in the UK currently, let alone in rural mid-Wales.  Can you point to the location of a "blue sign with arrows" on this length of track?
Sadie B (2016-07-10 09:27:59+00:00): https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuck007/22486891205/in/photolist-Ag6cjM-zYzDu2-AeUuK3-zj4xa1-zYzBQa-zYzBA2-zYv98J-AdMRkA-Ah4EeT-zxhKUH-yfLMQJ-xRhxps-wBHske-wjC1ZL-wmPUsT-wd61MF-vfD4pj-ux9Ty3-uEvduL-uH3mAr-AdMWzU-zYtTj9-zj4zZu-Ah4Hh6-AeUwas-zYtQyu-AdMTnb-AdMTaC-zYvawA-zj4xEQ-zYv8ry-xBLYF4-vN6xKj-vKZ3oB-wmtrTe-unU8ed-uo3oSH-unRCwj-tsQSiG-tt1VYg-tt1yFg-tt1iQK-tfZenb-u5Ywzc-t989ea-u3CAZC-tK4gto-sBbSyJ-sk14t6-s3pHgu

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/infrastructure/single-view/view/uks-first-etcs-level-2-signalling-goes-live.html
SomeoneElse (2016-07-10 09:37:31+00:00): The Railway Gazette article is from 2010 and only talks about north of Harlech, but presumably things have moved on since then.
Re licences, the Flickr photo is cc-by-sa so that isn't licence compatible, and is anyway only one sign of many, but presumably it's the licence for the sectional appendix that's needed.
user_5359 (2016-07-10 06:42:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277829147 ? I think these is duplicate.
user_5359 (2016-07-10 06:58:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of attraction: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction

Property you mean the key landuse, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse