piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-21 21:29:28+00:00): zobacz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/438978#map=19/53.13203/18.00743 "jeśli jest projektowana to czemu został zaznaczona jako w budowie? Wygląda na tagowanie pod render."
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-10-18 22:50:29+00:00): RakS-PL: nie rysujemy każdego pasa ruchu oddzielnie.
TheSwavu (2018-12-26 05:58:27+00:00): Spurce for:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298737477

?
Endres Pelka (2015-05-19 16:23:46+00:00): Dlaczego przesuwasz prawidłowo umieszczony punkt adresowy 370 metrów na zachód? Cofam tą iDioty edycję.
*Martin* (2023-01-19 16:59:04+00:00): Ahoj Jose. Viem ze je to historicky edit, ale to addr:street na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3026630987 je OK?
Jose Riha (2023-01-19 21:53:38+00:00): Cau Martin. Skor prehistoricky. To snad bol este cas, kedy som si fyzicky vymienal listy s uradmi (a niekedy ich potom rucne prepisoval). Podla source je to na 99.9 % prave informacia od uradu.
Dmytro O (2018-03-11 02:31:58+00:00): You have created a lot of duplicated items here. One of them is Pacific Ocean.

Another one is "Hecate Strait"
james_hiebert (2018-03-11 07:45:29+00:00): Really?! No one has noticed this in the 3 years since I made this edit?
Dmytro O (2018-03-11 08:21:22+00:00): I've noticed, because I cannot translate Pacific Ocean to my language. My changes give no result. That is how I've found more than one node.

There are other changesets made by you with Pacific Ocean: "24970341",  "26040393"
Dmytro O (2018-03-11 08:22:12+00:00): Besides Pacific ocean there are other entities duplicated.
Dmytro O (2018-03-11 15:30:51+00:00): Do you know how to remove all duplicated nodes from those changesets?
Dmytro O (2018-03-11 15:38:17+00:00):       2    name=Flamingo Inlet
      2    name=Houston Stewart Channel
      2    name=Kerouard Islands
      2    name=Louscoone Inlet
      2    name=Luxana Bay
      2    name=Otard Bay
      2    name=Rose Harbour
      2    name=Tian Islets
      3    name=Haida Gwaii
      3    name=Hecate Strait
      4    name=Queen Charlotte Mountains
      6    name=Océan Pacifique
      6    name:en=Pacific Ocean
      6    name:fr=Océan Pacifique
   1524    name=Queen Charlotte Islands
free_as_a_bird (2015-01-22 22:55:25+00:00): Luftige These, in der Tat. Und warum wurde das landuse=residential gelöscht?
Filip009 (2026-04-28 11:04:15+00:00): Ahoj, nevieš, čo by to malo byť? :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3026898445
Jose Riha (2026-04-28 12:01:06+00:00): azda ostruzinovy krik. 11 rokov je 11 rokov..
Filip009 (2026-04-28 12:05:58+00:00): Okej, pridal som, že je to krík.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-25 11:41:41+00:00): Jesś pewien że droga "Przez wieś" ma taką nadaną nazwę?

Czy to opisowa nazwa tej ulicy która nazwy nie ma?
Tomek7G (2021-09-07 08:58:10+00:00): To jest opisowa nazwa, którą nadałem dla odróżnienia jej od drogi "Zagumnia"
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-13 11:16:44+00:00): Czy ta wieś ma jakieś nazwy ulic? Czy one opisowe są wszystkie?
Tomek7G (2022-01-13 21:42:28+00:00): Żadna z ulic nie ma oficjalnej - urzędowej nazwy. Wszystko co wpisałem to nazwy opisowe (potoczne) używane na co dzień przez mieszkańców.
RicoElectrico (2018-02-16 19:15:46+00:00): Nazwa tej drogi jest trochę... dziwna. To się potem będzie pokazywać w spisie ulic.
pnorman (2015-07-21 01:03:45+00:00): You've indicated Google is the source for this as well as another changeset. Unfortunately, Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products.

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
osmuser63783 (2024-09-26 22:27:19+00:00): Hi, if you're still active could you please have a look at this note? Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4454245
Deanna Earley (2015-08-07 16:03:42+00:00): Can you confirm if this number was acquired by a survey or some other means?
iWowik (2017-11-26 16:35:05+00:00): Какая прелесть: "10а-й Ольховый участок".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1783781
Не подскажите, как это читается?
Dinamik (2017-11-26 17:45:45+00:00): Думаю, надо спросить тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9523824
maxerickson (2016-01-13 17:17:50+00:00): Hi-

I saw this tweet:

https://twitter.com/tkyjm/status/687319379445444609

and check a bit. Seems Honolulu is the official name?

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/15/15003.html

Since it looks like you set several language names, flagging it for your attention rather than making any changes.
aceman444 (2015-01-03 01:41:02+00:00): Dobry den, toto bol aky experiment na krizovatke Suche myto? Preco ste porozpajali cesty, ze sa teraz krizuju bez spolocnych bodov a pokazili ste tym aj relacie zakazov odbocenia, ktore su teraz niektore nefunkcne a niektore zbytocne. To ste postupovali podla akej schemy znacenia?
maps_not_naps (2025-08-27 22:21:51+00:00): Hello ElementoGEO,

I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298817668) that connected MT-406 over the river. There is now a bridge there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199618389), do you know if the ferry route still exists? If the ferry route no longer exists, would you be willing to update the area?

Thank you, and looking forward to hearing from you!
ElementoGEO (2025-09-15 13:20:39+00:00): Hello, 

the ferry route no longer exists. 
I removed it.
maps_not_naps (2025-09-15 21:13:47+00:00): Thank you!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-01 10:31:05+00:00): Pięknie wyrysowane budynki, jednak wszystkie przesunięte względem rzeczywistości, bo nikt nie powiedział, że trzeba podkład skalibrować przed rysowaniem?
Richard (2021-08-04 08:45:36+00:00): Hi! I realise this is a very belated followup but hoping you'll see this...

I went this way the other week (by car) and don't recall seeing any cycleway signs any more. It looks to me as if there were cycleway signs at one point but they've since been removed, probably because the path is borderline lethal.

Could you confirm? If that's the case then we can downgrade it to a footway, which is probably for the best. (There was a bit of Twitter controversy about this path recently: see https://twitter.com/GeorginaWilcox/status/1420155730758414339 )

cheers
Richard
pole_climber (2021-08-05 07:25:58+00:00): Morning Richard. How odd. I cycled passed the start of this route at Stratford St Mary only last week and the group of us said we must try that route to Ipswich again at some point. The section from Capel to Ipswich is fine, only used that a few days back and clearly signed. I'll try the lower section today with another cyclists who is more critical of routes than me and report back.
Richard (2021-08-05 10:10:17+00:00): Cheers! I think the main question is whether the blue cycleway signs are still up south of Capel.
pole_climber (2021-08-05 17:41:09+00:00): Cycled today from the start point at Stratford St Mary and the route is clearly signed as a cycle way all the way to the petrol station in question. To the petrol staion (from the south) is mainly a 1m wide path and 2m-5m away from the highway with a couple of short pinch points (it was built in the early 80s I think). Poorly maintainted but we didn't need to dismount or join the A12 carriageway to pass. The section from the petrol station to Capel is not signed and well overgrown but I suspect the signs are buried in the overgrown pathway. Highways England have accepted responsibility according to the BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-suffolk-58077620. I'll give it a couple of weeks and cycle it again. It's not a nice route but it is a direct route, to loud mainly, but it is clearly designated as a cycle route. All the best Gary.
pole_climber (2021-08-05 17:42:59+00:00): By the way I use cycle.travel all the time so understand your interest!
GerdP (2015-10-30 10:53:44+00:00): please review the tag highway=median

It is rarely used, you seem to use it for traffic_calming=* elements?
Polarbear (2015-10-22 19:08:07+00:00): Die Dorfstr in Ahrensfelde ist aber nicht mehr Berlin... (w252411523)
Tchiller (2016-07-07 13:48:49+00:00): sport=... sieht hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028530816/history komisch aus. Was genau sollte hier stehen?
Peter Dobratz (2015-01-11 00:58:16+00:00): I updated the buildings in this block today.  I moved the tags from this node onto the building and divided up the block into various components, each with their own address.  Let me know if that doesn't match your local knowledge of this area.
Parzelle13 (2017-06-13 20:56:32+00:00): Hallo, hat diese von dir vor 3 Jahren angelegte Relation 3973848 einen Sinn? Weder typ noch name sind angegeben.

gruß
d1g (2015-06-15 16:02:56+00:00): Здесь редактор удалил случайно тег здания, это не ваша ошибка, я тег здания вернул, а редактор с тех пор исправили и он больше не должен удалять теги в таких случаях.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 04:42:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028944326/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 04:43:26+00:00): wait, in this case it would be rather natural=spring as an obvious typical tagging
rui228 (2025-04-25 21:22:45+00:00): Olá. Pode verificar a linha. Poderá ter sido erro?
topolusitania (2025-04-27 22:29:32+00:00): Esta edição tem mais de dez anos, foi feita com o Potlatch 2.
Qual é a linha que é para verificar ?
rui228 (2025-04-30 00:53:58+00:00): Esta: Linha: Canal da Vila (298959416)
topolusitania (2025-04-30 10:21:31+00:00): Olá
Quando mapeei a Ria de Aveiro (há mais de 10 anos) pretendi dar nome e assinalar aquilo que na tradição da zona se chamavam as vias navegáveis da Ria. Daí o uso dos termos Cale, Canal, "Boca" e a escolha inicial da tag "river" ou "canal" para as representar. Desde essa altura já muitos mapeadores alteraram as tags. Esta nunca foi alterada, sabe-se lá porquê... Respondendo a tua pergunta concretamente, na altura , face ao que se pretendia, não foi um erro. Se encontrares uma tag melhor para o fim em vista, aceito sugestões :-)
Obrigado pela chamada de atenção
TL
rui228 (2025-04-30 19:12:55+00:00): Olá. Expliquei-mal quando disse que poderá ter sido erro.  Isto é, o que quis dizer foi que consta dos problemas do KeepRight que estava a tentar resolver e surgiu esta linha, daí o meu comentário. 
Problemas do KeepRight: Intersecção sem cruzamento
Descrição
Rio Vouga interseta com via fluvial Canal da Vila, mas não existe um nó de cruzamento, ponte ou túnel.
Cumprimentos. 
Pessoalmente não encontro tag melhor, pelo que fica como está. 
Cumprimentos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-26 04:23:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3840526 - dasz radę potwierdzić?
ForstEK (2019-05-19 09:11:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, anonme! Спасибо за вклад в редактирование карты, однако при этом стоит соблюдать определённую систему обозначений. Банкоматы отмечаются тэгом amenity=atm, а не кириллицей. Посмотрите тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=atm?uselang=ru
anonme (2021-10-22 05:16:21+00:00): Прошу прощения. Буду знать.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-15 17:53:26+00:00): Is it really a good idea to map private toilets in OSM?
GerdP (2015-10-21 14:23:56+00:00): please review:
what is meant with highway=nostop
on node 3029263391 ?
It looks like a highway=noext node,
but highway=nostop seems to indicate that one can go on here? If yes, please add the way.
odce72 (2015-10-22 14:19:38+00:00): Node 3029263391 modified with the label noexit=yes
GerdP (2015-10-22 15:24:03+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback
alphensebezorger (2016-04-27 07:07:37+00:00): Zo te zien is "Bike Totaal" op de verkeerde plek beland (Traaij 183). Volgens addr:housenumber zou het 45 zijn. Dat huisnummer zou natuurlijk ook verkeerd kunnen zijn.
Jeroen_ (2016-04-27 23:38:00+00:00): Goed gezien, huisnummer klopt niet, 45 is van de Fietsplus. Aangepast
Nakaner (2015-04-12 11:47:59+00:00): Da ich im Rahmen eines mechanischen Edits deutschlanweit gerade knapp 10.000 Signale sichte, ist mir aufgefallen, dass das Tagging des folgenden Signals etwas obskur ist. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3029495852/history 

Ein Ks-Hauptsignal kann kein Ks 2 anzeigen. Das Signal hat bestimmt ein gelbes Dreick unter dem rot-weißen Mastschild, oder? Dann wäre railway:signal:combined=* und railway:signal:combined:states=* besser gewesen als railway:signal:main(:states)=*.
Nakaner (2015-04-12 12:08:22+00:00): railway:ref=* an Signalen ist nicht richtig. Das sollte ref=* sein. railway:ref=* verwenden wir nur für die Betriebsstellenbezeichnungen von Bahnhöfen, Haltepunkten, Abzweigen usw. Sorry, dass ich alles Taggingfehler in deinen Edits finde, aber wenn man in Hessen die Signale sichtet, dann fällt das einem auf. :(
Constable (2019-06-04 17:43:50+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, vedo che sono passati anni ma hai aggiunto tu il parco quindi immagino tu sia della zona. Quello che ora risulta mappato come un parco giochi è davvero tutto un parco giochi oppure è un parco con all'interno un'area cons trutture per bambini e forse anche un campo da calcio?
Il nome inoltre è "sospetto", sembra tanto una descrizione, non un nome vero e proprio. I parchi di solito sono intitolati a personaggi storici/degni di nota.
Grazie!
ciao
Alessandro Rapella (2019-06-04 18:41:36+00:00): l'area mappata è un parco pubblico utilizzabile da tutti
Constable (2019-06-05 07:39:04+00:00): ottimo, grazie!
JUAN 54 (2021-05-07 08:59:05+00:00): hola , agluin pueden poner algunos fotos de este pueblo .pienso que es un pueblo muy lindo , ojala alguin dia viste este lugar .
marczoutendijk (2017-02-20 19:09:20+00:00): Er staat hier wel heel erg vaak de naam van de school vermeld. Daar zijn betere manieren voor. Zie:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57278
marczoutendijk (2017-02-20 20:36:06+00:00): Ik zie ook al wat de fout is: je hebt alle ruimtes tussen de gebouwen als school aangemerkt, terwijl het de bedoeling is dat je één oppervlakte tekent die om alle gebouwen heenstaat. Daar zet je de naam op. Er mag dus maar één opervlakte per school zijn.
Pas je het zelf aan?
marczoutendijk (2017-02-20 20:37:50+00:00): Zie ook deze weki met duidelijk voorbeeld:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Commodoortje (2017-02-20 23:47:40+00:00): inmiddels aangepast.
[one feature one element] (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
stedewa (2017-02-28 05:55:33+00:00): Hello StreetAv, 
Mapper des parking dans leur chemin d'accès? Pas très utile, non? Et il y a des parkings qui n'existent pas, par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299124122/history#map=19/46.51392/6.49141
Je veux bien corriger.. mais quel travail..
GerdP (2015-10-31 10:40:03+00:00): please review way 299130327:
highway=sidewalk is rarely used, so it might 
be highway=footway instead. 
But why map it as an area?
I only see a footway and a natural=tree_row
projecter63 (2015-11-01 21:43:19+00:00): German meets German in France ...
Ich antworte mal in deutscher Sprache ...
1) mein Fehler; richtig wäre:
highway=footway & footway=sidewalk
2) zu area: das 'Teil' wird kaum längs, sondern - auf dem Weg von der Bank o.ä zum Parkplatz - meist quer/diagonal/sonstwie be-/überlaufen; insofern wird es anders genutzt als ein langer, linienförmiger footway ...
anstelle area=yes würde ich heute eher area:highway=footway nehmen ...

Mein Herzblut hängt nicht so sehr an diesem Ort; insofern: einfach ändern ... ;-)

Grüße aus Lübeck
Rainer
GerdP (2015-11-02 10:39:50+00:00): alles klar, habe ein bisschen Lametta drangehängt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377959070
wombatmaper (2024-10-14 22:29:50+00:00): There seems to have been a typo in a few "building=storage tank" instead of "building=storage_tank" here.
I have gone though and fixed them. Just a headsup https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299193982/history
ElliottPlack (2024-10-14 23:22:58+00:00): Hey there, thanks for doing that!
andygol (2015-06-18 07:57:05+00:00): Добрый день,
не могли бы вы уточнить название [этой улицы](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53198135), похоже что она называется по другому. Поиск адреса мечети, говорит что мечеть находится на ул. Раздольной. Может быть что это именно Раздольная улица?
Endres Pelka (2015-09-18 16:57:16+00:00): Jeśli "pieszo-rowerowa", to może by tak foot=yes dodać?
Endres Pelka (2015-12-08 14:56:30+00:00): Doczekamy się kiedyś odpowiedzi bądź jakiejkolwiek reakcji? Ładna z was "promocja", nie ma co...
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-15 17:52:53+00:00): What is the source of this toilet data? BTW, is it really a good idea to map private toilets in OSM?

claimed source (Bing) is unlikely given details entered in this edit.
Nakaner (2015-04-15 12:45:17+00:00): Ist das Vorsignal am Blocksignal Nr. 633 ein Vr-Lichtsignal oder Vr-Formsignal? Du hast das nämlich nicht getaggt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3032176578/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:56:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299320465/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
WiktorN (2015-11-06 18:48:24+00:00): place=town nie ma być w tym miejscu, gdzie się najładniej wyświetla - bo decyzję, gdzie wyświetlić nazwę podejmuje renderer, tylko w tym miejscu - gdzie jest centrum miejscowości. Tak by użytkownik, który wprowadzi, że chce jechać do "Szklarskiej Poręby" trafił do miasta, a nie do lasu na przedmieściach.

Proszę, przesuń place=town z powrotem.
Zmianowy (2015-11-18 10:43:12+00:00): Wg mojej oceny nazwa jest umieszczona w centrum obszaru, który obejmuje.
WiktorN (2015-11-18 14:14:58+00:00): Obszar  to jest miasto Szklarska Poręba. Jego centrum zobaczysz tutaj:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cNW

To ta kropka obok Jakuszyc :-)

Szklarska Poręba to gmina miejska, co w kontekście tego:
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmina_miejska
(gminy o statusie miasta obejmują wyłącznie dane miasto w jego granicach administracyjnych) jest bardzo ciekawe.

Stąd - wydaje mi się, że bez sensu trzymać się centrum obszaru, tylko centrum. Jeżeli mówimy o centrum miasta, to centrum miasta. To w szczególności ułatwi w przypadku miast o diametralnie innym kształcie niż koło.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-14 18:18:59+00:00): Hello elizabethlakeurgentcare

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 6 years ago(!).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3033234607 was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you are familiar with (and from your username, that seems likely) then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove it.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
mangode (2016-05-15 14:58:23+00:00): Das ist keine Einbahnstraße.
 no oneway
MKnight (2016-05-15 16:30:58+00:00): Das was? warum änderst Du es nicht?
mangode (2016-05-15 17:21:35+00:00): Ich weiß nicht mehr wie , mit dem Handy
GerdP (2015-10-25 08:32:33+00:00): please review:
What does the tag highway=bamp
mean? It appears only on these two nodes:
node 3033947570 and 3033947569
I've changed it to traffic_calming=bump.
OK?
Marker13 (2015-10-26 05:52:08+00:00): ok, correctly
user_5359 (2016-11-18 09:31:45+00:00): Hallo, Dein Eintrag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3034562351) ist schon etwas her, aber hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Schützverein mit club=sport, sporting=shooting (wie jetzt üblicher ist) kennzeichnen?
trial (2020-03-29 11:53:33+00:00): Bonjour, je vois cette note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1460365#map=18/47.85040/-3.74898&layers=N
Comme il s'est passé 5 ans depuis ta contribution, tu peux vérifier ? Rien n'atteste la présence d'une pizzeria là en ce moment.
Endres Pelka (2015-02-10 12:59:32+00:00): Budynki skasowane bez uzasadnienia. Revertuję. ap67, jeśli masz coś w tym temacie do powiedzenia to proszę o kontakt.
eggie (2017-03-20 20:50:13+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit..
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-22 07:44:56+00:00): Ich habe organic=yes und payment:girocard=yes ergänzt. Es fehlen noch einige andere payment-Angaben und andere Tags wie wheelchair oder opening_hours.
RicoElectrico (2015-02-06 14:23:28+00:00): landuse=retail na węźle? Co autor miał na myśli? ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-16 21:51:57+00:00): Sorry for bothering you about an old changeset, but what is the licence of "Plan polyvalent de Douala" dataset?

Also, what is the meaning of standing=very_low tag used for example for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299606491 ?
cbeddow (2020-08-16 03:07:30+00:00): Just commenting to say I was hiking up here today and am adding more detail. Thanks for adding the initial detail!
HubMiner (2019-02-18 03:58:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3036517972
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services?uselang=en-US

Hi, this does not look like a highway service stop, could you check and confirm?
nemestrinus (2019-02-19 16:33:34+00:00): Your are correct, no services are available there. Cain Ranch is a plot of land owned by the City of Los Angeles
HubMiner (2019-02-20 04:23:13+00:00): Thanks!
mathieuS (2015-07-29 19:31:00+00:00): La longueur du tunnel ne doit pas figurer dans le tag name, mais dans le tag distance.
C'est corrigé dans ce changeset : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32964264
SimonPoole (2020-10-06 14:10:21+00:00): This changeset started routing EV7 over the motorway bridge, which is clearly wrong (both cycling and pedestrian access are forbidden). See the discussion here https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/j63usf/feedback_from_a_bicycle_tourist_in_sweden/g7w1ces?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Peilscheibe (2020-10-06 20:09:24+00:00): I'm not able to identify any motorway has been touched in this changeset nor the EV7. So I kindly ask if you could be a bit more specific if you think there was something wrong.
SimonPoole (2020-10-07 12:00:33+00:00): It seems as if the issue it goes even further back than your edit, but you created a couple of new ways (probably by splitting) for the bridge which were added in the changeset. So not your fault, sorry.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-20 00:14:59+00:00): Dear Maarten.  I see you have a length 长度 in a tag.  That's not necessary, as this is a geographic database.  Key names are by convention in British English.
Maarten Deen (2015-03-20 06:11:42+00:00): It would be nice to quote the object that you refer to, saves me from having to search for it. Fortunately it was the fifth object in the changeset so it did not take me to long. It's https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229254445 and check the history. I did not add that tag.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-20 06:20:27+00:00): Ooops, sorry.  Hitting up the right person.
Nakaner (2015-04-11 18:43:57+00:00): Ich habe Zweifel daran, dass das Einfahrsignal A in Renningen aus Leonberg ein Formsignal ist. Der Bahnhof hat doch Lichtsignale, oder? Hast du dich verklickt? :-) Das ist mir gerade aufgefallen, als ich manuell in JOSM bei meinem mechanischen Edit die Signale in der Region Stuttgart manuell zwischen SSB und DB getrennt habe.
RicoElectrico (2016-06-13 11:33:13+00:00): Potrzebna aktualizacja.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/544397
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-06-14 20:26:39+00:00): Zrobione.
malenki (2015-06-07 17:12:56+00:00): Das gelöschte hamlet habe ich nach Rückfrage beim ursprünglichen und ortskundigen Ersteller wiederhergestellt: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/285613515
War das Löschen ein Versehen?
David-HC (2015-06-15 16:16:40+00:00): Auch hier war der Grund (wie bei der "Gartenstadt" eine viel zu vordergründige Darstellung auf der Karte. Möglicherweise wurde die Darstellungsform jetzt angepasst. Sollte ich aus Versehen auch die Notizen im Kommentar mit gelöscht haben, bitte ich um Entschuldigung.