piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:48:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 81613794, 81614149, 81614302, 81614446, 81614512, 81614728, 81614882, 81615020, 81615105, 81616724, 81616887, 81617485, 81617748, 81632571, 81632602, 81632654, 81632698, 81632782, 81632805, 81632830, 81632936, 81632984, 81633005, 81633022, 81633034, 81633039, 81633043, 81633052, 81633060, 81633076, 81633083, 81633096, 81633105, 81633127, 81633186, 81633228, 81633254, 81633264, 81633285, 81633396, 81633453, 81633497, 81633533, 81633579, 81633626, 81633698, 81633762, 81633914, 81633972, 81634034, 81634064, 81634160, 81634354, 81634583, 81634611, 81634702, 81634741, 81634766, 81641406, 81641530, 81641680, 81656090, 81670386, 81670479, 81670604, 81670657, 81670677, 81671895, 81672236, 81672355, 81672444, 81672603, 81672934, 81673043, 81673344, 81673487, 81673516, 81673602, 81674127, 81674278, 81674423, 81674740, 81679297, 81679370, 81679616, 81679769, 81679890, 81679977, 81680078, 81680305, 81680509, 81701144, 81716174, 81716623, 81717861, 81718149, 81720302, 81720519, 81720591, 81764219, 81764245, 81764575, 81764759, 81764852, 81765053, 81765132, 81765437, 81766173, 81766423, 81766587, 81812034, 81816292, 81816473, 81816686, 81816989, 81817052, 81817445, 81819383, 81819469, 81819644, 81841947, 81841966, 81842072, 81842100, 81853724, 81853848, 81857397, 81857438, 81857745, 81858308, 81888686, 81888690, 81888693, 81888703, 81888714, 81888722, 81888731, 81888739, 81888746, 81888815, 81888982, 81889028, 81891131, 81891307, 81892138, 81892252, 81892270, 81892305, 81892344, 81892441, 81892577, 81892609, 81892744, 81892766, 81896413, 81911926, 81912618, 81912708, 81951456, 81951747, 81998728, 81999512, 81999757, 82000744, 82001253, 82001516, 82001935, 82002212, 82005681, 82005873, 82006442, 82025404, 82025558, 82025589, 82026770, 82035415, 82037336, 82042965, 82044599, 82045054, 82045773, 82046038, 82046176, 82052258, 82053838, 82054007, 82054234, 82054392, 82081547, 82087093, 82139296, 82153454, 82153793, 82154191, 82155459, 82155623, 82156029, 82156250, 82158652, 82182575, 82184239, 82184294, 82184334, 82184340, 82184415, 82184441, 82184514, 82185254, 82185680, 82207056, 82207357, 82207392, 82207501, 82207588, 82208317, 82208426, 82208444, 82215407, 82230355, 82230522, 82230787, 82230827, 82241863, 82242382, 82277626, 82288548, 82289390, 82289601, 82289687, 82290030, 82292323, 82293440, 82297811, 82298663, 82299244, 82320682, 82320781, 82321731, 82321755, 82321778, 82321878, 82321900, 82321942, 82321974, 82329319, 82332950, 82376988, 82379124, 82381135, 82409397, 82409598, 82451312, 82451502, 82451513, 82453199, 82453615, 82472265, 82473498, 82481503, 82501086, 82511126, 82544754, 82545191, 82552874, 82567418, 82568217, 82568978, 82592519, 82592625, 82592845, 82594158, 82602384, 82633074, 82633200, 82633672, 82686589, 82696119, 82696210, 82703947, 82704337.
Blueberry (2020-03-28 08:34:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Reverted, merci de cesser ce vandalisme.

Eric [Blueberry]
Frans S (2020-04-11 11:21:52+00:00): Hi Moonmegs, thanks for mapping the bulk of the buildings in this task.
Unfortunately there are some issues which require additional work on this task: several of the buildings are mapped having a non square shape. This is highly unlikely for a real building. We can safely assume that buildings are rectangular in this area unless we can see that this is not true.
As outlined in the instructions please do not let individual buildings share nodes - map them as separate objects. Although buildings may be connected in reality we run into a problem here. If someone wants to fix the shape of a building it automatically distorts the surrounding buildings making any cleanup a lot more difficult.
If you can, please solve these issues. But since you (probably) use ID editor, maybe leave this to someone using the more advanced josm editor. Or start using josm yourself. See for more info https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ee3XkQ2VwaY
Thanks again and please keep mapping.
ZZ29 (2020-03-31 20:01:52+00:00): Bonjour Laurent,
Pour information, il manque le tag "telecom=connection_point" (indiquant que c'est un point de mutualisation) sur le noeud suivant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7337280945 
On peut également rajouter la référence ARCEP "ref:FR:ARCEP" avec l'opendata Arcep (visualisable sur https://cartefibre.arcep.fr/ )
Bonne soirée,
ZZ29
raccoss (2021-05-20 08:44:25+00:00): Ciao. Ti contatto nuovamente per la questione dei sentieri di montagna con permessi di accesso: questa Strada della Blina ha <access: "permission">. Ciò vorrebbe dire che la strada è privata ma l'accesso è consentito previo permesso e come conseguenza viene esclusa dai motori delle mappe di escursionismo.
Immagino invece che questo sentiero, che non ho mai fatto, invece sia percorribile.
Scusa la mia petulanza.

Ho visto che ci sono altri sentieri in Piemonte che hanno questi problemi con il  tag <access>, mi stavo chiedendo se fosse il caso di portare questo argomento nella mailing list del Piemonte. Non ho mai fatto nulla del genere, tu hai esperienze in questo senso?

Ciao
Riccardo.
raccoss (2021-05-20 08:46:01+00:00): PS. Mi correggo, il tag access è settato su "private".
Jrachi (2021-05-20 09:05:20+00:00): Si tratta di una strada privata a tutti gli effetti con tanto di sbarra all'inizio.
Esiste anche un cartello ma talmente vecchio da essere irriconoscibile.
Molti su OSM in casi come questo aggiungono i tag:
foot=yes e bicycle=yes
Vengono messi per evitare che il percorso sia escluso dai router.
Ma come non si mappa per il rendering, non s mappa neanche per il routing!
E vero, normalmente su strade di questo genere se si vuole andare a piedi (o in mtb) lo si fa tranquillamente.
Per la legge Italiana una strada è sempre di libera circolazione pedonale (non in bici), se il proprietario non permette il transito pedonale deve segnalarlo con cartelli ed i cartelli devono essere visibili (presenti) su tutta la strada o sui confini della proprietà.

I tag di access sono una bella rogna, infida e maligna, non si capisce mai dove e come applicarli e sopratutto le pagine sulla wiki sono in inglese (quella di private cita solo esempi US!)
Mentre invece dovendo essere una traslazione di cartelli che sono diversi da paese a paese così come le leggi, dovrebbero avere una spiegazione localizzata.
Ciao, Ivo
raccoss (2021-05-20 09:52:12+00:00): Grazie della spiegazione. Beh, in questo caso allora personalmente mi sembra corretto l'uso del tag e non troppo penalizzante per il routing. (Ma sono inesperto, magari sbaglio).

Grazie per la spiegazione e scusa la rottura di scatole. Ma mi fa piacere aver trovato un utente ben informato e disponibile come te.
Cactooz (2020-03-28 20:30:15+00:00): source -> local knowledge;aerial imagery
blackboxlogic (2020-05-28 14:48:53+00:00): Hey Kent,

I watched your video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYa4ODgo-Bc where you demonstrate mapping golf courses in OSM and this is one of the changes you made in that video. It might be easier to view your change here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82734831/
That's a 10 mile road that you changed into a golf cart path while advised others to do similar.

OSM is a public resource used for many things, including navigating of vehicles. Removing a road from the map has a serious impact to people in the real world.

Other mappers have been making similar changes (hard to tell if it is a result of your video or not).

Please Don't:
- Don't change roads into golf cart paths (A safer alternative is to add a new golf cart path along the side of the road)
- Don't label neighboring residential buildings as offices (make a house a house)

Could you please:
- Point me to the tool that consumes this data, so I can recommend changes to make those two practices unnecessary.
- Ask if you have questions (Either here, or there is a #golf channel in https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ which could benefit from your presence)
- Put a comment under your youtube video with those two "please don't" corrections

Thank you,
-Alex
Syl (2020-12-04 14:40:53+00:00): Bonjour, une note récente fait référence a un tag ajouté dans ce groupe de changement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2451874
Je vous laisse voir comment y répondre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 22:02:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 82486928, 82585683, 82585838, 82586333.
Recoil16 (2020-03-28 10:34:18+00:00): Hallo planesandstuff, deine Änderungen am Städtischen Gymnasium Wermelskirchen fügen den Namen zu jedem Gebäude einzeln zu. Das ist so meines Erachtens nicht korrekt. Wenn überhaupt, sollten die Gebäude den Namen tragen, mit dem sie bezeichnet werden, z.B. "Altbau", "Neubau", "Banane" etc. Der name des Gymnasiums ist bereits an der amenity=school Fläche verzeichnet.
LG Moritz
planesandstuff (2020-03-28 11:35:25+00:00): Hallo Moritz, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, den ich gerne so umsetze! Du hast recht, der Name der Schule steckt bereits in der Fläche
ma-rt-in (2020-03-28 18:10:45+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du die Auf-/Abfahrt so abgehackt gemappt. Das sieht ja schlimm aus.
vg
luschi (2020-03-28 20:24:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices#More_features_needed
ma-rt-in (2020-03-28 21:23:13+00:00): Schön das du mir da einen Link setzt. Aber warum hast du die Wege dann so abgezeckt gemappt, das geht doch sauberer.
luschi (2020-03-28 22:42:42+00:00): die Wege waren schon so seit 2015       
Dass ich keine Knoten verschoben habe ist hier klar zu erkennen.     
Wenn dir die Wege zu zackig sind kannst du sie gerne anpassen.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-11 12:04:49+00:00): Hallo wolfshafen,

wieso hast du bei www.osm.org/way/24046905 foot auf no gesetzt? Hat das was mit den Erdrutschen zu tun?

Weil die Strecke vom Bootsanleger (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27092125) nach Osten ist wieder frei. Wenn du foot=no wegen dieser Sperrung gesetzt hast, dann sollten wir hier das foot=no auch auf foot=yes ändern. Wenn die Wege bei der Katharinenschlucht immer gesperrt waren, dann können die natürlich auf foot=no bleiben.

PS: Gab dazu auch eine Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2743813, vielleicht kannst du deine Rückmeldung posten.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
wolfshafen (2021-09-11 12:18:55+00:00): Hallo Ze0zohk1,
da ich die Änderung vor mehr als einem Jahr machte kann ich mich nicht mehr genau daran erinnern. Es steht dir frei eine Aktualisierung / Korrektur durchzuführen, wenn du sie für sinnvoll erachtest.

Viele Grüße
wolfshafen
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-11 12:24:00+00:00): Hallo wolfshafen,

danke für deine Rückmeldung. Da mir das aber zu unsicher ist, habe ich lieber eine neue Notiz angelegt: Ich habe eine neue Notiz erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2846502

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Cactooz (2020-03-28 20:29:34+00:00): source -> local knowledge;aerial imagery
will_p (2020-04-20 14:08:08+00:00): Here you have deleted the ground surveyed old names (Rosehill School and Shepherd School) and replaced them with Bluecoat Aspley Academy. The latter has never been located here. This site has been ground surveyed by local mappers, including myself, several times over the years, so I am certain of this.

The old_ref:edubase is also wrong and actually refers again to Bluecoat Aspley Academy, which is still active and has not moved.

I'll fix this myself when I have time and will certainly check for more errors at the same time.

Again, you seem to be carelessly changing existing data. Please be more careful.
alexkemp (2020-04-20 14:44:31+00:00): You wrote:
> Here you have deleted the ground surveyed old names (Rosehill School and Shepherd School) and replaced them with Bluecoat Aspley Academy.

I do not delete old names. I change them to "old_name". However, researching it I see that you are saying that my 'old_name' is wrong, and I apologise for that if so.

(the foll is out-of-date) I have not replaced it with 'Bluecoat Aspley'. You added it as 'Bluecoat Academy Primary School' 2 years ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60506732) and then again shortly after to 'Bluecoat Primary Academy' (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60513079). That is the name that I kept it to, since that is the location in EduBase and in the school website.

EduBase shows the predecessor to be 'Bluecoat Aspley' (https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/145145#school-links). Hence my changes. If you have surveyed it and know better (which I do not doubt) then change the 'old_name' designations and add a note for future mappers so that they will not make the same mistake as me.

There is no need to write an annoyed changeset comment to me. Just change the 'old_name' to the correct 'old_names' with a note to say why. Why make a big deal of it?

I'm going to stop replying to your comments. Your irritated attitude is winding me up & wasting vast amounts of my time. Please stop reacting in such a juvenile manner and start behaving as an adult, please, with reason & balance.
ma-rt-in (2020-03-28 18:09:42+00:00): Hallo,
hinterlasse doch bitte ein Kommentar bei deinen Änderungen, das hilft ungemein zu verstehen was du bearbeitet hast!
vg
MikeN (2020-03-28 00:43:13+00:00): Please save data before moving on to a new area to avoid creating changesets that span the country.
vespax (2020-03-27 22:46:04+00:00): Thanks for improving these in the area!
Geo-Tobi (2023-10-08 14:02:27+00:00): Mehrere Hausnummern sind durch Semikolon zu trennen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*
opendcc (2020-03-28 19:47:45+00:00): Hallo,

suburb sind wirklich grosse Stadtteile (München Schwabing), das finde ich hier Moosburg doch etwas übertrieben. place=neighbourhood ist wohl passender.

Servus
verbuchselt (2020-03-28 19:57:16+00:00): Ich hab die organisatorische Gliederung der Stadt Moosburg in Stadtteile betrachtet.
Bin mir nicht zu 100% sicher, ob die Auflistung auf Wikipedia stimmt - werde da nochmal bei der Stadt nachfragen, aber halte ich dennoch für sinnvoll. Die Neustadt ist Stadtteil und gleichzeitig ein großes Wohngebiet - die Bonau aber auch ein Stadtteil, bestehend aus mehreren Wohngebieten.
verbuchselt (2020-03-28 19:58:02+00:00): Kann die Aufteilung nur für große Stadtteile natürlich trotzdem verstehen.
opendcc (2020-03-28 20:38:00+00:00): Hallo,

es ist nicht nur die organisatorische Unterteilung - auch die Kartenausleitungen gehen von einer bestimmten Größe aus. So wird z.B. Suburb schon bei noch recht großen Zoombereichen ausgeblendet, neighbourhood wird auch bei stärkeren Zoom dargestellt. Ebenso berücksichtigt der Kartenausleiter das bei der Schriftgröße und es paßt irgendwie nicht, wenn Bonau größer als Mauern wird.

Und mit dem Blick von Aussen: München Grünwald, Müchen Bogenhausen oder Landshut Altdorf sagt mir was, Moosburg - Mühlbachbogen eher nicht. Das ist einfach eine Siedlung, nicht mehr.
verbuchselt (2020-03-28 21:19:53+00:00): Dann sollte die Neustadt aber am besten auch nicht mehr als Suburb eingestuft werden, dann ist es wenigstens einheitlich gelöst. ;-) LG
MaddMapper (2020-03-27 23:06:57+00:00): Additional Resource: Yandex Panorama
highflyer74 (2020-03-28 15:48:48+00:00): Hello there!

I fixed a typo in this hedge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785226172 and the one beside it.

Just out of curiosity: the key "hedge:width=*" is only used 24 times around the globe (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hedge%3Awidth). Wouldn't it be smarter to use width=*?

Concering the values: Watch out for differences in "." and "," as these are interpreted differently by software.

All the best to you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 23:23:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 80857285, 80857384, 80857690, 81321017, 81321179, 81321382.
highflyer74 (2020-03-29 10:55:17+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Ich hatte eben einen Deiner Edits in Kanada kommentiert. Bei diesem CS fiel mit auf, dass Du amenity=food_court für die Lounges verwendest. Damit ist eigentlich etwas anderes gemeint (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfood_court).

Es ist sehr wichtig, die Dinge mit den richtigen Tags zu versehen, damit diese dann auch für den Endnutzer nutzbar werden.

Für Airline Lounges habe ich noch kein passendes Tag gefunden, insofern soll das kein Vorwurf sein. Ich will Dich nur ein wenig dafür sensibilisieren.

Ich schicke Dir per PN noch ein paar Links. Am besten Du liest Dir einmal alles durch, damit Du verstehst, wie OSM funktioniert.

Viele Grüße!
planesandstuff (2020-03-29 12:30:15+00:00): Gemeinschaftlicher Gastronomiebereich ist im englischen Food Court. Das ist natürlich nicht besonders passend für eine Flughafenlounge. Welches Tag wäre denn für eine dafür am geeignetsten? Restaurant?
highflyer74 (2020-03-29 13:59:22+00:00): Ich habe nichts finden können, was grossflächig in Benutzung ist. Weder auf https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ noch in den Forenthemen. Deshalb habe ich dort mal ein Thema aufgemacht: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68999
Glassman (2020-03-28 16:45:10+00:00): You can improve the building by squaring the outline. Just select the outline, then type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736627
Cactooz (2020-03-28 20:29:27+00:00): source -> local knowledge;aerial imagery
Glassman (2020-03-28 16:47:04+00:00): If you want to go back to square all of the building, just use the link https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736910?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Lil-Stevie%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Lil-Stevie%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736910
highflyer74 (2020-03-28 16:10:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

You added a node here without any usable data on it. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Please let me know what you actually wanted to add.

Also: are you sure that the location is correct?

Thank you!
--------------------------------------------------
Halo dan selamat datang di OSM!

Anda menambahkan simpul di sini tanpa data yang dapat digunakan di dalamnya. Harap diingat bahwa, agar data bermanfaat bagi orang lain, Anda harus menandai objek berdasarkan wiki OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Kalau tidak, entri Anda tidak dapat dibaca oleh perangkat lunak menggunakan basis data OSM.

Tolong beri tahu saya apa yang sebenarnya ingin Anda tambahkan.

Juga: apakah Anda yakin bahwa lokasinya benar?

Terima kasih!
user_5359 (2020-04-12 04:19:50+00:00): Cleared after 14 days without reaction.
mueschel (2020-03-28 09:40:11+00:00): Hi,
you added two nodes here without any valid tag. Please read the introduction pages to learn how tagging works in OSM.

Thanks
Jan
baegas (2020-03-28 22:07:22+00:00): I'm sorry.
johndoe (2020-03-29 14:42:19+00:00): Hallo wribln,
im cs #81929983 habe ich Dir mitgeteilt, daß die Bushaltestellen in Berlin bereits alle richtig getagt sind. Ich bitte Dich, dem 'highway=bus_stop' kein 'bus=yes' und kein 'public_transport=platform' zu ergänzen !

Danke und Gruß
johndoe
MapMakerGal (2020-03-28 00:09:06+00:00): Boas, en primeiro lugar grazas polas túas edicións. En segundo lugar infórmoche de que as túas edicións son incorrectas.
Pra engadir un enderezo hai que empregar a etiqueta 'addr:housenumber' pró número e 'add:place' pró lugar. Tes moitas etiquetas 'addr:xx' pra elixir.
O que non pode ser é que empregues a etiqueta 'name', que é pra outros propósitos.
Tambén cando engades cousas coma "edificio agricola", tampouco van no nome, senón que en 'description'!
Un saúdo e calquera dúbida temos esta canle, telegram oficial (cando rematas e subes unha edición aparéceche á esquerda) entre outras.
mapman44 (2020-03-28 02:18:46+00:00): Please use something a little more descriptive than "Edited the map." That's what we're all doing everyday. Please state what you edited in each changeset. Thanks.
Paul_012 (2020-03-28 02:01:45+00:00): Ugh. Failed to account for nodes being shared by other unrelated stuff. Fixing...
Frans S (2020-04-02 07:43:11+00:00): Hi Steve.
You probably understand that your mapping here of many clusters of buildings cannot be accepted and therefore deleted.
I clean up the balance (still 79 of your mappings) and will invalidate this task so it can be mapped again.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-03-28 15:06:30+00:00): Hi Chandra. Back at work again after a 6 week stay in the south of Spain and occupied with other work
I've seen waterway and highway mappings done by you. I wander if you are familiar with the fastdraw option in JOSM. See this wiki. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/FastDraw
very helpful and easy to use.
When you use it in combination with the simplify area tool )more tool tab) you get a very smooth highway and get rid of the  unnecessary  nodes 
Best regards

Frans
mapman44 (2020-03-31 14:07:50+00:00): Hello, Jerry_J and welcome to OSM. Please do not delete objects and then re-draw essentially the same objects. Instead, please edit the existing objects so the editing history is preserved. Thanks.
user_2008655 (2020-03-28 04:14:56+00:00): 15時に開通します...
mikko_tamura (2020-03-28 07:55:28+00:00): Hi there :) great effort just ask me if you need help in tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82738339
mikko_tamura (2020-03-28 07:55:29+00:00): Hi there :) great effort just ask me if you need help in tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82738339
nevw (2020-03-28 02:40:59+00:00): Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable. 
Please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
MapMakerGal (2020-03-28 14:19:43+00:00): Boas, máis obxeccións: 'addr:housenumber' lóxicamente é pró número e 'addr:place' pró lugar, non os confundas!

Moitas grazas.
mapman44 (2020-03-31 16:18:51+00:00): Hello, FrogMouse, and welcome to OSM. Please note that your edits have resulted in two roads on the same route - both a driveway that already existed and a minor unclassified that you created. Please check and fix this. If you need help, just ask. Also please leave changeset comments that describe the edits you are making. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments    Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82738560
mikko_tamura (2020-03-28 07:56:54+00:00): are you sure there is a pharmacy in the middle of this plantation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82738643
mariotomo (2023-01-24 15:15:34+00:00): disculpa si te lo pregunto después de tanto tiempo de tu edición, pero de donde sacas **el nombre** de Cerro Banco? y **la ubicación** del poblado Rovira Arriba?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-03-29 20:20:15+00:00): Hiya Chanman,

Was this supposed to be published onto the public map? It looks like private information.
Witterung (2020-11-29 17:23:35+00:00): Hi Allstar,

please don't tag outer rings. And please also don't blindly run the iD autovalidator – it may improve for the worse (happened here).

Kind regards,
Peter
ALLstarGUY (2020-12-02 12:52:38+00:00): I don't understand.  I was the Ranger assigned by City of San Diego to patrol this area and I know it quite well.   Please clarify / explain 
 / eloborate on my error..  Thanks
Alecs01 (2020-03-28 08:40:25+00:00): Hi, I walked there a few times and I'm pretty sure those are consulate offices open to the public. Do you think it may have been moved recentely?