piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-09-24 15:30:09+00:00): Dag Wohust,
landuse=forest kan op een vlak..  source=3dshapes  dat zal niet. 
Dat was ooit een import van jaren terug.

Je bron zal zijn survey of Actueel_ortho25_WMS ?
Een rij bomen kan ook op een lijnelement
natural=tree_row

MVG,
Eggie
gscscnd (2020-09-24 15:59:14+00:00): 1. Nie dokończyłeś konwersji Parkowej (Ruda Śląska) na unclassified. Poza tym czy to na pewno dobry pomysł? Jest tam strefa 30 km/h, są progi zwalniające.
2. Czy na Gwareckiej jest tak duży ruch, żeby ją podnosić z residential do tertiary?
3. Zepsułeś ścieżkę rowerową przy skrzyżowaniu Kokota i Kunickiego. Poprawiłem.
zuicz (2020-09-26 17:45:19+00:00): Do wycofania według mnie
Reeniz (2020-09-24 14:43:05+00:00): Fuente?
Avocadough! (2020-09-24 17:05:18+00:00): https://www.elrancaguino.cl/2020/02/04/asi-cambia-el-transito-vehicular-en-calles-de-rancagua-ante-nuevas-regulaciones/
I initially looked at Mapillary from 2018, but this is a more recent source. Direction has been reverted.
Reeniz (2020-09-24 17:13:47+00:00): Jaja si. Mas cuidado para la proxima!
tux67 (2020-09-24 15:59:36+00:00): Hi donnabyte,
bitte mal ein wenig einlesen vor weiteren Änderungen: Einfach nur einen Namen an ein Objekt ist kein Konzept bei OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Bevorzugt werden Elemente in OSM nicht glöscht, sondern zur Erhaltung der Historie mit einem Lifecyclepräfix versehen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix#H.C3.A4ufige_Lebenszyklus-Pr.C3.A4fixe
Bei Gebäuden hat das den zusätzlichen Vorteil, das kein Folgemapper das Gebäude wieder von einem veraltenden Luftbild einträgt. 
Desweiteren hast du eine Doublette eingetragen.
Die Punkte sind jetzt angepasst.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91444868
Nathan Cruz (2020-10-11 23:02:06+00:00): Olá, rafaelds.

Obrigado por contribuir com o mapa de São José!

Notei que você tem colocado o nome do condomínio nos edifícios que o compõe. Queria entender um pouco melhor porque decidiu ir por este caminho.

Eu tenho tentado mapear o nome e endereço dos condomínios residenciais com uma área com as tags landuse=residential e residential=apartments. As torres marco só como building=apartments mesmo e, se tiver, coloco outras informações como quantidade de andares.

Esta forma de mapear é parecida com a forma é feito recomendado mapear universidades, áreas religiosas e hotéis com diversos prédios, por isto eu e outro mapeador aqui de São José estamos fazendo assim.

Se quiser pode me contactar pelo telegram também. Meu usuário lá é @bla77. Estou no grupo de suporte do OSM e OSM Brasil.
tux67 (2020-09-24 15:51:13+00:00): Hi endradon - So wie ich das sehe, hast du die Relation nicht angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/67286
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91446131
endradon (2020-09-24 16:17:00+00:00): Hallo tux, danke für den Hinweise. Werde ich gleich berichtigen.
tux67 (2020-09-24 16:22:46+00:00): Danke - Die Busrelationen hab' ich nicht angeschaut - vielleicht schaust du mal ob die nicht kaputt gegangen sind.
endradon (2020-09-24 16:24:20+00:00): Mache ich!
nitram1234 (2020-09-28 10:57:09+00:00): Hi thanks for mapping! For the next time, could you please try to only edit stuff in one area at a time? This helps others trying to review edits in a certain area. Thanks a bunch in advance. Cheers!
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-25 07:20:13+00:00): G'day and welcome to OSM,

The parking lots that you modified need to form the outline of all the parking spaces, instead of being a small area (e.g. how they were mapped in the first version here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/643551809). I've updated these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91475264

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
osmviborg (2020-09-24 15:38:59+00:00): Hej. Det du har lavet her dur ikke. Du sletter en bygning og flytter en anden til en forkert position. Tilbageført.
osmviborg (2020-09-24 15:40:14+00:00): Undlad venligst at rette i adressepunkterne. Jeg har flyttet dit vaskeri ud på sin egen node.
naveenpf (2020-09-24 19:39:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91447521
hoserab (2020-09-25 16:56:20+00:00): You have deleted the temporary at-grade intersection at 69 St & Stoney Trail and have changed tags along the Stoney Trail alignment from "highway=construction" to "highway=motorway" without deleting the "construction=*" tags.

Can you corroborate that the new bridge at 69 St is actually open? According to the project website it won't be until Oct 1 (see http://www.swcrrproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/SWCRR-Traffic-Advisory-Discovery-Ridge-Boulevard-Roadway-Alignment-Change-September-20-2020.pdf), and from personal experience four days ago (Sep 21) it isn't open yet.

If you can't, can you please roll back these changes? The road will be done *soon*, but the map shouldn't be updated until it is actually open.

Thanks
hoserab (2020-09-25 18:42:37+00:00): *sigh*

I drove through about half an hour ago: the bridge isn't open, the at-grade intersection is still there...
yakra (2020-09-28 16:45:29+00:00): Thanks for the feedback on this. I was basing my edits on a discussion on the skyscraperpage.com forum reporting that the new WB alignment, and WB offramp & onramp were open. The temporary connection on the north side was removed in changeset 91391439. It looked suspect, but I decided to assume the editor knew what they were doing. The traffic advisory you linked contradicted this, but  http://www.swcrrproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/BR43-phase-closures.pdf gave me enough doubt. (Is the bridge open and closed at the same time, till Oct 1?)
In the end, I wasn't too confident in my changes, but figured if I had it wrong someone out there would clean up my mess. :)

Fixing:
I assume this would mean adding back the temporary connection, as well as the median crossovers there before, just with a wider median now.

Otherwise, did I have the new WB alignment about right, and the merge point west of 85 St?
hoserab (2020-10-01 18:12:29+00:00): Never mind, I was trying to work backward through the edit history in this area; I thought you'd blown away the north side of the intersection, not changeset 91391439. I can absolutely, positively, 100% confirm that the bridge was NOT open as recent as Tuesday evening, no matter what the traffic advisory said.

This will all be open shortly so at this point putting it back the way it was is moot. I'm just annoyed (not at you) that people with itchy trigger fingers jumped the gun on this. I added a note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2060528) stating that the at-grade intersection was temporary, in the misguided hope that people would leave it alone until the completed, final road alignment actually opened...
hoserab (2020-10-01 18:13:58+00:00): And with respect to the 'merge point' west of here: eh, even if it's not at precisely the right spot it's close enough, it won't affect the accuracy of the traffic movement in any meaningful way.
Marc_ch (2021-01-23 17:57:40+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322203856
je ne comprend pas votre modification.
les bureaux de Gruyère Energie SA ne sont pas une cabine de transformation HT.
s'il y a une cabine dans le batiment, il faut faire un 2ieme objet.
Salutations,
Marc
Karol_S (2020-09-24 15:54:04+00:00): Źródło: mapy topograficzne, PRNG
Cascafico (2020-09-24 19:41:53+00:00): Railway does not exist anymore, even abandoned would not reflect reality since it is completely dismantled.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91450552
tux67 (2020-09-24 16:07:04+00:00): Hi WolfGb,
die Namen der Brücken kommen nicht an die Straße.
Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
Das müsste geändert werden - machst du das?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91450579
DaCor (2020-09-25 19:37:21+00:00): Thanks for this edit in OpenStreetMap. If you have any other useful information for your local area please feel free to go ahead and add it to the map. You can also connect with other Irish mappers through https://www.openstreetmap.ie/contact/

Thanks, 
Dave
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-25 06:19:39+00:00): Jei netinka service=driveway - reikia uždėti kitą/tinkančią service= reikšmę. Grąžinau driveway.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-09-30 11:19:14+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap ☺
The changeset that you have sent spans over a very large area. It is strongly advised to avoid this, as this notifies a large amount of person from several contries and makes the changeset difficult to assess. In Maps.me, you can for instance synchronise the map before taking any plane: this will split the changeset from one country to the other.
Thanks! ☺
ndm (2020-09-25 21:47:13+00:00): Removed service road that you added - needs ground survey following recent building work - please don't add it via AI.
singhiyv (2020-09-28 11:27:39+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the roads based on the available OSM imagery. It is good to see the community improvising our edits. Thanks for your suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.
DressyPear4 (2020-09-25 07:14:20+00:00): Olá, não é correto estender a geometria de praças nos limites das vias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91452064
GMOArts (2020-09-25 11:36:24+00:00): Não sabia. Sou novo aqui
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91452064
ChristianA (2020-11-11 07:58:24+00:00): Finns det en stig här? Eller är det något som bara typ jag skulle kalla en stig?
mbrage (2020-11-11 16:01:56+00:00): Den var ok till en början (sett från gullvagnen)  men när den närmade sig mossen tappade jag bort den helt. Sen blev den bra igen sista delen innan vändplatsen.
user_10149683 (2020-09-25 16:36:18+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM, Can you please explain why you have unaligned perfect ways.
fghj753 (2020-09-25 20:17:28+00:00): Dear Mr Neilson, 
Congratulations for committing Your first changeset to OSM. Your changes have provoked quite a discussion among OSM World discord community. We understand You had best intentions regarding mapping of Your church, but sadly actions you made might be considered as counter-productive because they didn't uphold to certain community guidelines. 
We would be very happy if You could join discussion at server (You can find link by using online search term "osm world discord") where we could find best solution providing digital exposure to Your church while maintaining compliance with community standards.
The discussion covered multiple topics and carrying them all over to changeset comment(s) is not effective way to improve current situation. Feel free to ask questions here, by joining discord (preferred for fastest feedback), sending private message to me or Luke or contacting local mappers via talk-GB mailing list.
PS i did not add direct link to discord due to possible spam filtering.
Robert Neilson (2020-09-26 11:14:42+00:00): I am sorry if my efforts have been wasted.  My primary objectives, in order of precedence, were:
1. To remove the designation of two areas of land as public parking areas. They are not public spaces. They are clearly marked at the entrances as private land and, although the one nearest Finkle Street was purchased by the church as land for church development, i.e. a new building, both areas can be used only by anyone attending the church.  Unfortunately, the two areas are widely abused by people who just as easily could use the Morrisons Car Park, just across Stuart Road.  Church Members -- there are more than 100 active members -- believe that this "P" designation may be a  cause of this abuse.
2. To remove the service road designations into the two areas wrongly marked as public car parks. They do not exist.  There are no markings on the surface of each of these areas.
3. To designate that the building between the two areas wrongly marked as public car parks is the Pontefract Congregational Church Hall.
4. To designate that green area next to the Church Hall is, in part, a closed graveyard containing the remains of former members of the Church, with the remainder an assembly area for emergency evacuation or church outside activities.
     I have just noticed that the road marked between Finkle Street and Stuart Road that runs in front of the Chapel and Church Hall is not named.  It is the southern part of Back Northgate, which was bisected when Morrison's Supermarket was built. The remaining part of Back Northgate, which runs north east from Skinner Lane, is named.  The postal address of the Pontefract Congregational Church Hall is still "Back Northgate".
     I should be grateful if someone who understands the community guidelines better than me can make these essential changes.
Robert Neilson
Chairman of Trustees
Pontefract Congregational Church
Kovoschiz (2020-09-24 18:26:32+00:00): Family is obviously not species. There are 48 `family=Arecaceae` among 210 valid`family=` instances, as well as 126 `taxon:family=` which is fewer. I'm not sure if you will be happy with the latter.  There are also ~100 `order=`, if not counting the ~500 `order=Coniferales`.  Are you going to change them all? I don't see `taxon:*=` being recommended, despite amount of `taxon:species=` and `taxon:cultivar=` (let alone 580 `cultivar=`).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91453880
mueschel (2020-09-24 18:43:01+00:00): When it comes to 'Arecacaea', we already have more than 2000 'genus', more than 500 'species' and 1000 'taxon'. All of these keys are documented in the Wiki. We don't need yet another, undocumented tag for the same thing. 
OSM is not a botanical database where we need to be precise about the different taxonomic levels.
Kovoschiz (2020-09-25 04:35:31+00:00): `species=Arecaceae` and `genus=Arecaceae` are precisely wrong. Do you want yet another incorrect usage of those keys? 
If you prefer using individual levels rather than `taxon=`, that's why I chose `family=` over `taxon:family=`. Do you plan on doing something on the other 209 `family=` instances?
Math1985 (2020-09-25 12:11:28+00:00): Ziet er goed uit, dank voor je bijdrage!
cyton (2021-06-13 19:00:41+00:00): Hallo, inwiefern ist way 36826764 (komplett) überdacht?
Das sieht auf den truedop Bildern anders aus!
Bitte sieh in Zukunft davon ab die default werte zu taggen wie covered=no, das ist bei nahezu allen Straßen der fall, somit ergibt es nur Sinn das als covered=yes zu taggen, wenn das mal explizit so ist. Es ist ja leider fehleranfällig, sodass es nicht sinnvoll ist das überall dazu zu taggen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91454609
FrankOverman (2020-09-26 13:22:03+00:00): Correcting double building:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91512828
eggie (2020-09-24 18:06:44+00:00): Oke blgorissen, maar in dat geval dus ook de regel cycleway=opposite weghalen. Want dat is niet meer van toepassing. Het is de uitzondering voor tweewielers op oneway=yes.
kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-24 19:12:35+00:00): cycleway opposite verwijderd
blgorissen (2020-09-26 10:55:50+00:00): Dag Eggie, ik zal hier de volgende keer op letten.
SHARCRASH (2021-02-08 10:37:23+00:00): Hi! Why did you add building=yes? There is no building! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851131621
tux67 (2020-09-25 05:34:52+00:00): Hi nochmal - ich vermute ich bin der einzige, der hier im Umkreis das review requested flag auswertet ;-) Ich denke soweit ok  (Busrelationen in MG sind - denke ich -eine Sache für sich.  Machst du die korrespondierende Note noch zu?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91456852
axelr (2020-09-25 21:31:59+00:00): Willkommen enradon,
In die Busrouten hast du ein paar Fehler eingebaut. Bei unseren public_transport - Routen muss die Reihenfolge eingehalten werden. Zuerst alle Haltestellen in der Reihenfolge Stop1,Platform1,Stop2,Platform2,Stop3,Platform3 usw. Dann kommen alle gefahrenen Wege in der Reihenfolge wie sie befahren werden.
Gruß, Axel
tux67 (2020-09-26 07:11:23+00:00): Danke Axel, die Busrouten hatte ich mir zugegebener Maßen nicht genau angeschaut - nach meiner letzten intensiveren Betrachtung der Routen in MG hatte ich den Eindruck Realität und OSM klaffen inzwischen ziemlich auseinander ... oder liege ich da falsch?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91456852
axelr (2020-09-26 08:27:53+00:00): Hallo tux67, vor einem Jahr hätte ich dir noch zugestimmt.
tux67 (2020-09-26 12:26:43+00:00): ok, das passt - vor etwas über einem Jahr hatte ich mir das angesehen und dann zugunsten Adressen und Wanderwegen verworfen. Wenn du so fleissig warst das alles wieder auf Stand zu bringen .. Hut ab und danke .. ;-)
Rainero (2020-09-25 18:43:15+00:00): Hallo merindhaarty,
you have checked the checkbox that you would like to have this changeset reviewed, so I took a look.
You have split the Schleißheimer Straße at the crossing of Agnesstraße. The relation of the bus route "Shopping Express" is going along the Schleißheimer Straße, thus the editor must put the splitted ways in the right sequence in the relation. That may go wrong in some cases. Although that relation has quite some ways in a wrong sequence, here at the point, where you made the split, the sequence is correct. No need to worry, but thank you for keeping an eye on that and raising the flag.
Bye,
Rainer
Rainero (2020-09-24 20:32:40+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91386953 .
Revert wegen Nutzung unerlaubter Quelle (Bayernatlas)
Es ist in Bayern leider mühselig: die einzig zulässige Quelle ist Erfassung der Adressen vor Ort.

Servus,
Rainer
jngt (2020-09-25 06:16:49+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
vielen Dank für die Info - war mir tatsächlich nicht bewusst, da ich sogar von der Stadtverwaltung darauf verwiesen wurde. Ich werde Bayernatlas nicht mehr als Quelle verwenden.

Viele Grüße,
jngt
user_2066394 (2020-09-24 19:10:15+00:00): Gebäude wurde als Neubau eingetragen, wie ist da der Baufortschritt bzw. die Hausnummernbeschilderung?
Magical Yash (2020-09-24 19:12:53+00:00): I think it got suddenly Numbered when I was trying to figure other things out.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-12 11:46:09+00:00): what you wanted to mark here? Addresses?
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-26 07:32:09+00:00): Hi diogo 7, welcome to OSM?

name=teste ?

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=91459690#20/-25.52019/-48.50502

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pacman541 (2020-09-25 06:22:45+00:00): Добрый день!
У вас ошибки в правках, пропала часть озера Волго, исправьте пожалуйста.
eggie (2020-09-24 18:34:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Je geeft aan no MTB in de Vlootbeek.. Wordt daar dan gefietst?
access=no is het bord verboden toegang. Begin nooit met de tag access=no  De paden renderen dan niet meer goed.. je ziet ze nauwelijks op de kaart.
Wanneer er niet gefietst mag worden geef je bicycle=no aan.
Je kunt ook vehicle=no toevoegen. dan vang je alles met wielen in één klap.
access=no graag verwijderen
Dit zijn je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91460038
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-24 18:45:11+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd..
Geef svp expliciet aan wie er niet mogen komen. access=no is iedereen. 
Je kunt vehicle = no of bicycle=no  toevoegen als er werkelijk een fietsverbod is. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-24 18:49:12+00:00): Beste oldedub. 
Je pad zit op verschillende plaatsen geplakt aan de landuse. je kunt dat voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken.
Het pad door het water. is dat een doorwaadbare plaats?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-24 18:57:56+00:00): Laurens .. Het pad heb ik even losgemaakt en goed gelegd. De brug ook toegevoegd. Ik gebruik een transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht als achtergrond.
MVG,
Eggie
hocu (2020-09-27 08:28:42+00:00): Merhaba,

OSM'e hosgeldin. Binalar ile ilgili bir ipucu vermek isterim. Bina seklini cizdikten sonra sekli secip Q tusuna basarsan editor binanin koselerini dik acili hale getirerek bina seklini duzeltecektir. Dik acili binalarda her zaman bunu yapmani oneririm.

Katkilarin icin tesekkurler.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91460470
Itd5sS6uZ (2020-12-14 15:37:52+00:00): Hi dpawlyk,

I'm not sure how removing random trees improves the map. There was also some other data like house numbers that was removed from this changeset as well that wasn't  described in this changeset comment. I personally surveyed the data myself and used recent Mapbox imagery to trace them, so I think they shouldn't be removed.
One of the principles of OSM is to not change data to make the map look pretty, i.e. don't map for the renderer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer. Also, OSM is a collection of data, not just a map, and so having the information about trees or house numbers might be useful for a field planner, for instance: https://www.openstreetmap.org/about

Could you please explain what you were trying to accomplish with this changeset? Did you observe these trees not existing 3 months ago?

Also, for future reference, in Ridgewood, the Bing imagery you used is not as recent as the Mapbox Satellite imagery, so maybe take a look at that when making future edits.

- Itd5sS6uZ
dpawlyk (2020-12-14 16:18:12+00:00): Trees are a problem because it's likely you are going to miss many of them.. It also adds a support burden (updates to keep reflect new or removed tree). It's data that will never be quite right or complete. It won't be good enough for field planning.
Itd5sS6uZ (2020-12-14 16:48:05+00:00): I can see your point for trees that it causes a support burden. Here's a compromise: what I can do is map less trees. Instead of at streets or in forests (where there are bound to be many trees), I can map them at open parks or outdoor spaces, since there are less of these and there are many less trees to maintain. And there are some well-known trees at botanical gardens that have a bunch of detail on them, like what species they are. Those I think are worth maintaining. https://reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/arta10/what_is_the_proper_use_of_tree_points/egqjnnr/
This is useful since it's used in OSM projects such as TreeMap: https://ocsidlab.github.io/treemap/#16/12.9800/77.6400 

As for the house numbers and other features including towers (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7529907430/history) and disabled parking spaces (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7326425068/history), I think these should not have been deleted in the same changeset, as these don't change (like every 6 years), unlike trees. 

What do you think?