piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kevo (2016-08-30 13:33:32+00:00): "been on-the-ground quality of Canvec's hydrological data"

If you're talking about on-the-ground checks in areas like this changeset, you've proven that you're unqualified to make decisions on data in a country that is 30 times bigger than your own.  This land is still essentially unexplored and a vast majority of it is impassable even on foot.

If you're going to mass revert areas far outside the realm of your knowledge, at least send a message to the talk-ca list instead of unilaterally reverting changes from 6,000km away while preaching that this is a "craft mapping" project to users who actually understand their country.

It's cute when Europeans think they understand Canada and it's been getting on my nerves for a while.
Rps333 (2016-08-30 13:33:39+00:00): Michael, I always check the data against Bing/ Mapbox imagery/ NRCan Map in JOSM. In this area the imagery is very poor.

I also alway check if the CANVEC data is better than what is already there. Not alway the case.

I added one layer at a time; roads (if required), water, streams and sometimes wetlands. The woods layer in CANVEC in my option is usually very poor, and most of Canada is woods anyway so I never use it.

I also tend to only add data to unmapped Northern Communities around James Bay and Nunavut. (Nunavut is over 2 million km2 and has a pop of about 30K)

I also alway run the validation in JOSM. But for some reason it does not pick up the broken lakes. Not sure why.

I understand problems that bad imports over area where there is all ready data can cause. (Most of my edits are done with ID).

 But there are huge areas in Canada with no data at all, so CANVEC must be used.
Nakaner (2016-08-30 13:59:15+00:00): I do not claim that every lake has to be checked on the ground but some secpscepticism about third-party datasets is always a good idea.

Has ever been an OSM mapper in Northern Communities around James Bay and Nunavut and can say if the lakes at CANVEC match the reality? If you do remote sensing (outside OSM), it is a good idea to pick out some samples to check if the classificiation works as expected (or to train the classification algorithm/rules).

Regarding the JOSM validator: This check might be disabled at your JOSM. Maybe you delete your JOSM profile and created a new one with default settings?
jfd553 (2016-08-30 14:18:36+00:00): All available Canvec data in northern areas were checked less than 10 years ago using much higher resolution imagery than what is available in OSM. Everything is not perfect but way much accurate than nothing. 
I used to work on the checking process mentioned above!
the506 (2016-08-30 16:55:36+00:00): In addition, most of these communities are tiny (<1000 people) and often do not have quality Internet access. The chances of there being active local OSM mappers in these areas are essentially zero. 

For all its faults, CANVEC is literally all we have in these areas, and given the sheer size of the north, it's just not worth it to spend hours per tile going through everything with a fine tooth comb. 

Nunavut is not Germany.
LogicalViolinist (2016-08-30 17:03:50+00:00): Not to mention that Bing Imagery can be older than CanVec itself (10-15 years or more)
mikelmaron (2016-08-31 15:02:41+00:00): > I won't wait.

This is not OK.

OSM only works with cooperation and respect. We find ways to help support each others work and make the map better. The work of this changeset is led by active mappers in an active community, who are ready to discuss and work on their data. Certainly there can be improvements, and we can work together to get there.

There are very few situations where a unilateral and immediate revert is justified (like active vandalism), and possibly zero where such an action would be taken without consulting the DWG, and especially where the mapper is willing to actively engage in discussion of the issue.

Let's figure out what conversations we need to have and guidance we can put in place, so that our community remains a welcoming and cooperative place for making the best map in the entire world.

-Mikel
Nakaner (2016-08-31 18:34:37+00:00): I have sent an email to the Talk-ca mailing list via Gmane. I hope it arrives. Otherwise I'll resent it the normal way. (I have subscribed the list)
Rps333 (2016-09-06 12:11:00+00:00): Ref JOSM validator: I have deleted my JOSM profile. It now picks up the broken lakes. Thanks for the info.

I will be happy to fix the broken lakes and any other problems that are in this change set.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-23 19:18:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Is this the official name for the baseball field? The name tag is only for official names. If you don't know the official name for this field, then please leave the 'name' tag blank, as the other two tags you added are enough for it.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-23 19:18:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Is this the official name for the baseball field? The name tag is only for official names. If you don't know the official name for this field, then please leave the 'name' tag blank, as the other two tags you added are enough for it.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-23 19:20:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Is this the official name for the baseball field? The name tag is only for official names. If you don't know the official name for this field, then please leave the 'name' tag blank, as the other two tags you added are enough for it.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-23 19:20:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Is this the official name for the baseball field? The name tag is only for official names. If you don't know the official name for this field, then please leave the 'name' tag blank, as the other two tags you added are enough for it.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-23 19:27:30+00:00): Please stop adding what the item is to the 'name' tag.  It's for what the item is officially named.  With this footpath, all that is necessary is the 'highway=footpath' tag.  Nothing else unless it has an official name that it's called.
Nakaner-repair (2016-08-28 16:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41756737 where the changeset comment is: Revert low-quality CANVEC import due to violation of Import Guideline and technical errors. See discussion of changeset 39517002.
Nakaner-repair (2016-08-28 16:14:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41756737 where the changeset comment is: Revert low-quality CANVEC import due to violation of Import Guideline and technical errors. See discussion of changeset 39517002.
zstadler (2016-05-23 21:23:57+00:00): Dear Marten,

Was there any special reason to split the boundary of the Nahal Dalton Nature Reserve into 2 separate ways?

Usually, boundaries do not need to interact with traisl or roads and they can cross one another even without creating a junction.

Best regards,
Zeev
Marten2300 (2016-05-31 19:24:24+00:00): Dear Zeev,
I only noticed your message now, To be honest I don't now how this happend. I did not split the bounderie on purpose. I did add a trail in this area. So there is no reason at all to spit this bounderie.

Kind regards,
Marten
wille (2017-04-28 20:42:59+00:00): Olá, Global system!

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OSM! Apenas uma pequena correção: não abreviamos nomes der ruas, assim utilizamos sempre Rua, Avenida, Travessa, com o nome completo.

Obrigado!
keithonearth (2016-05-23 20:29:36+00:00): Oops, this was a Bing trace, not the strava data.
Baconcrisp (2016-05-23 21:16:42+00:00): actually in Honduras
Baconcrisp (2016-05-23 21:55:03+00:00): actually in Honduras
highflyer74 (2016-05-24 09:35:34+00:00): Hello!

Check this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4203317037. I think there was some fingertrouble involved here... Can the node be removed?
ijsb (2016-05-24 17:01:15+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I removed the node.
highflyer74 (2016-05-24 17:26:49+00:00): Welcome :-)
trigpoint (2016-05-24 16:58:03+00:00): What is the source of the 20 mph speed limits you have added for Taunton Mews and Huntsworth Mews? They do not appear on mapillary  so I am wondering if they are genuine?
Also Huntsworth Mews looks too narrow to have lane markings, the lanes=2 tag should only be used when the road is marked with lanes. These are obviously very unusual for residential streets.
Also please can you explain why you see the need to add pointless tags such as foot=yes bicycle=yes to residential roads?
All they do is make the important, not default tags harder to spot for othe mappers in the community.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-24 01:16:38+00:00): abbafei, I honestly doubt PennDOT upped the speed limit between Exits #33 & #34 going NB to 70.  That's still a bad downhill there into a flyover ramp.  Plus, in that link you have as your source, it says for that section '33 miles', which to me, indicates it really starts at US-40's interchange (Exit #33).  Have you field checked this?
abbafei (2016-05-24 19:19:03+00:00): No, i haven't field checked it. Will probably revert this and people can get better info. There was not very much data in the press release about PennDOT highways as compared to Turnpike highways.
MichaelVL (2017-05-07 15:43:09+00:00): Hej,
Jeg ved ikke præcis hvad der menes med 'forkert placering af Kongerslev Pizza & KebabHouse i FVST'.
Jeg har nu flyttet denne node til hvor jeg har observeret dette pizza sted holder til 1 Maj, 2017.
/Michael
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-05-18 20:25:08+00:00): Det der menes, er at jeg har brugt 
http://digitalfrihed.dk/restaurants/all.html

til at importere pizzariaet. Det sker på baggrund af fødevarestyrelsens (FVST) data.

Fødevarestyrelsens data er i dette og mange  andre tilfælde forkert eller mangelfuldt.

For Kongerslev Pizza har fødevarestyrelsen registrereret positionen: "lat":0.000, "lon":0.0
hvilket jo er forkert. Jeg har så placeret det på en bedre position og du har så fundet den helt rigtigt position.

Så det er jo glimrende.
PT-53 (2016-11-07 14:18:02+00:00): Hallo N3S,
keep right zeigt für die Fußgängerunterführung in Sigmaringen eine Fehlermeldung "beinahe-Verbindungen, Node 4203377328" an:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=78443983

Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?

Grüße PT-53
PT-53 (2016-11-08 08:44:52+00:00): Hallo N3S,
nach Anschluß der Unterführung an den Gehweg sollte noch die keep right-Fehlermeldung auf erledigt (vorübergehend ignorieren) gesetzt werden. Machst Du das noch oder soll ich das erledigen ?
Grüße
Supaplex (2016-05-24 04:38:25+00:00):  恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-05-24 04:40:38+00:00): 由於Maps.Me App的限制，並無法很有效的編輯住宅區建案，導致需用其他類別標示。建議可以登入OpenStreetMap網站用線上編輯器標示建案範圍
BushmanK (2017-01-06 18:02:10+00:00): Можете объяснить, почему вы решили обозначить множество остановочных павильонов отдельными точками amenity=shelter вместо того, чтобы назначить shelter=yes точкам остановочных пунктов, как это предписывает https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter ?
luch86 (2017-01-06 18:21:37+00:00): Павильоны я давно уже обозначаю не так, а полигонами building=roof. Это детализация, которая позволяет указать количество павильонов, их точное расположение и прочие подробности (скамейки, рекламные щиты и т.д.)

shelter=yes тоже обязательно ставлю вместе с bench=* и bin=*, противоречий тут не вижу.
BushmanK (2017-01-06 18:48:01+00:00): Ну вот конкретно в этом changeset-е - почти десяток amenity=shelter самостоятельных в виде точки.
Противоречие вполне явное: amenity=shelter - это тег для самостоятельных объектов, основное назначение которых - укрытие. А в случае остановок общественного транспорта, наличие укрытия - это свойство остановочного пункта, потому и следует использовать shelter=yes, как признак. Создавать отдельно точку остановки с признаком shelter=yes и рядом - другой объект, который amenity=shelter - неправильно, так как это ведет к задваиванию.
luch86 (2017-01-06 19:15:40+00:00): Это я делал в мае, давно уже. У нас ещё несколько лет назад были споры, корректно ли использовать amenity=shelter на остановках ОТ. С тех пор придумали описанный в вики уточняющий тег shelter_type=public_transport, поэтому явной ошибкой это не является. Но можно поспорить, являются ли эти павильоны укрытиями.

Неоднозначность amenity=shelter мне самому не нравится, поэтому сейчас его не ставлю. А там, где эти точки стоят, планирую постепенно рисовать крыши со скамейками.
maraf24 (2016-05-25 06:56:12+00:00): A ulica?
Bootprint (2016-05-26 13:19:38+00:00): Looks like this changeset deleted a bunch of highways and roads.
jfd553 (2016-05-31 15:33:32+00:00): Yan, il semble que tu ais détruit de nombreux segments de routes à l'entrée du Pont Mercier...
Pourrais-tu les recapter svp?
Alouette955 (2016-06-19 13:20:56+00:00): Piste cyclable disparue aussi du Pont Jacques Cartier
jfd553 (2016-06-19 20:27:10+00:00): Yan, un commentaire? il semble que tu ais éliminer le pont jacques-cartier existant pour en faire une nouvelle version sans piste cyclable...
SomeoneElse (2016-07-17 18:37:37+00:00): Si ces suppressions ont tort, ce que quelqu'un a besoin d'aide revenir il? Si oui, envoyez un courriel à la Groupe de travail données data@osmfoundation.org .
jfd553 (2016-07-17 20:32:14+00:00): I still probe YanTremblay edits from time to time. He has been contacted and seems to conform to best practices now...
naoliv (2016-05-24 11:33:00+00:00): Almir, o que você quis representar aqui?
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-05-24 03:34:53+00:00): Changeset comment should read "Further reverting changesets of many deletions and drawings"
Supaplex (2016-05-24 04:35:58+00:00):  恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
tonyf1 (2017-04-21 07:47:12+00:00): Hi, you may well be right but Google Maps is not an allowable source because of copyright. Can you provide alternate evidence like a photo of a street sign?
Supaplex (2016-05-24 04:36:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
LLlypuk82 (2016-05-24 20:35:16+00:00): По табличке — верный режим (сам вносил данные). Но побывал там в воскресенье — магазин работал (а позже увидел, что не должен был). Поэтому решил уточнить, всё-таки.
pratikyadav (2016-05-28 13:45:40+00:00): you have wrongly added a highway tag on residential landuse area.
Vulcanodong (2016-05-26 05:50:12+00:00): 同意 
祠堂就是祭拜祖先神灵的庙宇用“temple”属性是合适的
highflyer74 (2016-05-25 15:10:53+00:00): Hello there!

Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420457760. Do you mean irrigation=*?

Happy mapping!
ToniE (2016-05-24 06:49:31+00:00): Hallo David,
willkommen bei OSM.
Wäre hier nicht shop=* besser als "Briefkasten"?
Gruß,
Toni aus Ottobrunn
highflyer74 (2016-05-25 16:41:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

All the best,

highflyer74
Hb- (2025-01-05 21:34:11+00:00): Die hierin gesetzte Vogelsanger Straße 11 liegt wohl ein Grundstück weiter nördlich.
Supaplex (2016-05-24 16:10:24+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
BushmanK (2016-05-25 16:24:03+00:00): Вы переименовали всё Северное кладбище в "могилу деда", для всех пользователей данных OpenStreetMap
highflyer74 (2016-05-25 09:07:26+00:00): Moin!

Bitte daran denken, Zugangsberechtigungen über das access=* Tag zu regeln.

Gruß aus dem Norden!
OpenMapMax (2016-05-26 07:04:33+00:00): Wollte einzelne Beschränkungen löschen, welche ich vor einiger Zeit versehentlich gesetzt habe. Ich finde die Beschränkungen sollten auch nur da gesetzt sein, wo es auch dementsprechende Beschilderung gibt.

Ist da was schiefgelaufen ?
highflyer74 (2016-05-26 08:37:33+00:00): Oh entschuldige, ich meinte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389072643. Ich bin nur über die Carports gestolpert, weil Du "amenty" statt "amenity" geschrieben hattest, also ein schlichter Tippfehler.
Dann fiel mir auf, daß dort private=yes verwendet wurde (gerade gesehen, daß Du das gar nicht gesetzt hattest). Darauf bezog sich mein Kommentar. Dort sollte lieber access=private verwendet werden, wie eigentlich alles diesbezüglich per access=* geregelt wird.

Eine andere Überlegung ist, ob es sinnvoll ist, private Carports als amenity=parking zu mappen. Das Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking) sieht dies eigentlich nur für Parkplätze vor, die der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich sind. Diese werden dann auf den meisten Karten auch entsprechend dargestellt.

So weit meine Gedanken dazu :-)
Supaplex (2016-05-25 11:55:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
MCalaOSM (2016-05-26 20:19:30+00:00): Mi spiegheresti queste correzioni?
dgitto (2016-05-26 20:26:34+00:00): Ciao ho notato su taginfo alcuni tag building=tes che mi sembravano errori di digitazione.
Rub21 (2016-05-27 20:52:17+00:00): hola  dgitto, evita de hacer ediciones tan grandes, por favor centrese en lugares que no contengan continentes.
dgitto (2016-05-27 21:34:50+00:00): FWI understood: sorry, my mistake
muralito (2016-05-24 15:28:36+00:00): Tuve que revertir este cambio. Las manzanzas no son building, son city_block. Por favor, mapear de forma correcta.
La etiqueta building es para edificios indivuduales.
maraf24 (2016-05-27 09:43:27+00:00): Odtworzyłem ten budynek do postaci sprzed zmiany, a ten tutaj narysowany usunąłem.
jozek1980 (2016-06-02 20:04:28+00:00): To bardzo mi przykro gdyż ja tutaj własnie mieszkam.
jozek1980 (2016-06-02 20:08:02+00:00): A budynek nie przylega dokładnie do ulicy :)
maraf24 (2016-06-02 22:00:12+00:00): To było tak:
-istniejący tu budynek przerobiłeś na ulicę
-nowa ulica nie była połączona z resztą dróg
-wcześniej ulica też już istniała, więc powstał duplikat. Ktoś to naprawił, niestety usunął tą pierwszą, właściwą.
-ta co została (zrobiona z budynku), była nie do końca dobrze opisana
-potem dodałeś budynek, ale nieco krzywo

Odtworzyłem i budynek, i ulicę. Ten co dodałeś usunąłem, jako duplikat.
Sądzę też, że jego położenie było całkiem prawidłowe. Patrząc na ortofotomapę, która jest dokładnie skalibrowana, to teraz ten budynek jest za daleko od drogi.
jozek1980 (2016-06-03 08:58:28+00:00): Ok maraf24 zostawmy tak jak jest, bo będziemy tak przerabiać w nieskończoność. Jak chcesz zmienić to zmień ja ruszać już nie będę :)
Matthew Porth (2016-05-24 09:31:24+00:00): Many apologise. I'm still new to this. The comment should read "Added foot path from A1307 to Pope Mill. Add confluence to the the golf course and Lion Meadow foot paths.
iWowik (2016-05-27 11:41:35+00:00): Теги гидранта оказались на границе населенного пункта. Перенесите их с нее куда следовало.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47795795
highflyer74 (2016-05-25 16:02:30+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Damit die Dinge, die man in die Datenbank eingibt auch von den Leuten genutzt werden kann, ist es wichtig, das Tagging aus dem OSM-Wiki zu verwenden.

In diesem Fall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin!
literan (2016-05-24 13:48:04+00:00): city - для городов св. 100 тыс. человек. Так что откатываю. См. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Place_In_Russia
literan (2016-05-24 12:36:51+00:00): откуда место для отдыха посреди ленинградского проспекта?
luschi (2016-06-06 17:58:18+00:00): Hallo frosch,
bei einem Kreisverkehr(junction=roundabout) ist es nicht nötig oneway=yes zu erfassen. Das ist sogar falsch.
Ich habe es hier entfernt.
lg aus Südtirol :-)
frosch (2016-06-19 13:06:36+00:00): Servus Luschi,
danke für den Hinweis. Bin leider etwas aus der Übung. 
LG aus Bayern.
catoblepa (2016-05-24 19:41:46+00:00): Ci sono alcune modifiche riguardanti le aziende agricole da apportare, altrimenti il changeset è da annullare in parte: 
- area disegnata in modo troppo grossolano 
- le aree con landuse non hanno un indirizzo, disegna gli edifici od aggiungi un punto con i dati dell'az. agricola.

Attendo una tua risposta, 
ciao.
mavl (2016-05-24 17:05:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Два пробела подряд в тегах official_name и official_name:ru.
catoblepa (2016-05-24 19:37:26+00:00): Ci sono alcune modifiche da apportare, altrimenti il changeset è da annullare:
- area disegnata in modo troppo grossolano
- le aree con landuse non hanno un indirizzo, ma gli edifici si: dovresti attribuire a loro l'indirizzo ed il numero civico

Attendo una tua risposta,
ciao.
chnav (2016-05-24 16:24:44+00:00): Здравствуйте, пока не появится достаточно опыта - не двигайте здания массово. Смещения у спутниковых снимков отличаются, здания были нарисованы по Bing, а вы передаинули по Мапбоксу. Когда обновят снимки - вы снова будете двигать здания ?
Чтобы такого не происходило, снимки калибруют по GPS-трекам, а здания рисуют по фундаментам. Короче всё откатываю взад.
chnav (2016-05-24 16:29:24+00:00): Кажется я перепутал, здания были нарисованы по старым снимкам, а сейчас снимки обновили. В любом случае требуется калибровка и согласование смещений с местными маперами.
ToniE (2016-05-24 17:01:51+00:00): Hi Gurbet,
welcome to OSM.

BTW: the official tag for Speed Cameras is
highway=speed_camera
(with underscore '_')

Find more about tags and keys ... in different languages
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

Regards,
Toni
highflyer74 (2016-05-25 13:39:39+00:00): Hello!

Please remember to use currency:XXX=* according https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_4217 when tagging vending machines. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:currency. Can you check "scellini" and change it accordingly?

Thank you!
catoblepa (2016-05-24 19:16:49+00:00): A causa di alcuni grossi errori nel gruppo di modifiche ho annullato tutto il changeset:
- percorsi dalle forme non reali
- modifiche improprie ad una relazione

p.s.: ma siete sempre del Volta? Serve supporto?
user_5359 (2016-05-24 17:05:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position (outside a building) and street name of your node!
literan (2016-05-24 13:20:04+00:00): если это кафе и мойка - то при чем здесь автосервис? мойка тут уже обозначена.
kayle (2016-05-25 07:01:52+00:00): Pár bodov zmazaných (stane sa), ale pokreslené komplet nové cesty už cez existujúce? Dosť pochybujem že ten okruh je cesta I. triedy a vnútorné cesty medzi domami zas III. triedy. Toto je živá mapa, takže opatrne s úpravami.Možno by bolo dobré si pozrieť http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Cs:Main_Page čo a ako značiť a v prípadné otázky radi zodpovieme na https://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk/
Something B (2018-01-18 16:59:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, lollipopsic!
Название "Бокс" и тег amenity=dojo противоречат друг другу. Пожалуйста уточните, что именно имелось в виду.
С уважением,
Something B.
Supaplex (2016-05-24 11:35:21+00:00): What does "sss" means?
kayle (2016-05-25 06:53:52+00:00): Ahoj, vieš mi povedať prečo si pomazal adresné body?