piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-31 05:15:30+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55905188
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-02-11 01:56:33+00:00): Aqui você deletou o ponto que definia a cidade, reverti toda esta edição.
user_5359 (2018-01-31 05:31:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you switch you Esri or Digital Global Image (see the layer icon (the fourth icon on the right side (if you use the iD editior)?
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:22:25+00:00): Hi jeison smith, welcome to OSM. Please only map what's on the ground. Don't create fictive data! #vandalism

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55905448
Constable (2018-01-31 08:27:39+00:00): Hi, this guest house looks at best misplaced, here it looks like there's just a parking lot, not even a single building. Please move it to the proper location!
eggie (2018-01-30 19:54:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Parkedits liggen onder een vergrootglas momenteel. Niet elk stukje groen verdient de tag Leisure park. Leisure park is een functie die meestal als vlak over een groot gebied ligt met water, bos en gras. 
Stukjes gemeentegroen worden meestal getagd als landuse=village_green.
Commodoortje (2018-01-30 19:59:46+00:00): Dit lijkt mij een pokemon edit.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:07:31+00:00): Deze edit zal worden teruggedraaid
eggie (2018-01-30 20:19:18+00:00): reverted Wijzigingenset #5590689wegens oneigenlijke parkedits.
Constable (2018-01-31 10:03:20+00:00): ciao, grazie per aver aggiunto la ciclabile, ricordati però di connetterla alle strade adiacenti nei punti in cui sono presenti attraversamenti pedonali/ciclabili, altrimenti risulta solo una linea blu sulla mappa, ma tutti i servizi di routing/navigazione non sono in grado di utilizzarla, perché appunto non risulta connessa al resto della rete stradale
Grazie, ciao!
Constable (2018-02-06 10:41:51+00:00): per favore connetti la ciclabile!
Commodoortje (2018-01-30 19:59:51+00:00): Dit lijkt mij een pokemon edit.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:06:18+00:00): De edit zal worden teruggedraaid
eggie (2018-01-30 20:11:45+00:00): Dit is voor een "klein parkje" een veel te groot gebied voor je edits.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:18:36+00:00): reverted Wijzigingenset #55906890
eggie (2018-01-30 20:24:26+00:00): Hier was ook van een parkeerplaats een wandelpad gemaakt.
baspng (2018-01-30 21:49:19+00:00): Obrigado pela correção efetuada no nome da Biblioteca, Flavio Alves Silva.
baspng.
Commodoortje (2018-01-30 19:59:57+00:00): Dit lijkt mij een pokemon edit.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:07:08+00:00): Deze edit zal worden teruggedraaid. Graag reactie over je motief.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:18:13+00:00): reverted Wijzigingenset #55906866
Commodoortje (2018-01-30 20:00:02+00:00): Dit lijkt mij een pokemon edit.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:10:11+00:00): Om "conflicten" te voorkomen draai ik alle edits terug van nieuw naar oud.
eggie (2018-01-30 20:17:44+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #55906848
Het voetpad heb ik teruggelegd.
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:21:06+00:00): Hi jeison smith, welcome to OSM. Please only map what's on the ground. Don't create fictive data! #vandalism

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55906153
Jarek 🚲 (2018-05-19 08:28:21+00:00): Hey Nate. Thanks for adding the detail. When you draw sidewalks, please take care to link them to the roads at intersections. The ways must cross and have a common node. Otherwise the routers get confused as to how people can go, and you get results like these: https://i.imgur.com/rSBmDUU.png
Nate Wessel (2018-05-21 13:11:51+00:00): Ah... that's a weird outcome. I'm not sure I agree with making the connection though if the crossing is unmarked. Crossings on streets like this are allowable and common at any point. For sidewalks in this area I've been trying to map just what's actually built/painted on the road. 

I definitely see the pros and cons to that approach, but I think it's better than what's going on in most of Toronto right now. 

I'm of the mind that what we really need is better pedestrian routers.
Jarek 🚲 (2018-05-21 14:05:45+00:00): Yes indeed there are many different ways to map these. I assume you've seen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#How_to_map ?

My interpretation would be that the OSM way for these roads is symbolic anyway (it goes down the centre of the roadway, doesn't specify width, etc - Toronto doesn't use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area ), so adding symbolic sidewalk information (e.g. sidewalk=both, sidewalk:width=1 m) on the road ways in cases of "simple" sidewalks should be fine.

If I may: adding the new ways doesn't seem to me to add much value and creates some problems for routers having to guess where jumping between ways/crossing streets is possible, or guessing names of sidewalks from names of nearby street (to instruct "walk south on Sorauren Avenue" rather than "walk south on this unnamed sidewalk").

But of course if you're keen on continuing then do go on, it's an open project.
Nate Wessel (2018-05-22 14:02:23+00:00): I have seen that, and I take your point regarding the centerlines. In other cities, I've been a big advocate of tagging sidewalks on street ways. 

I do however think it's interesting in toronto to map sidewalks separately, and especially marked crossings where they exist. There are a lot of complicated situations like around Lansdowne Ave just to the east of this changeset where crossing the street can be quite difficult and is actually prevented by barriers in some cases. In other cases, it feels like s stretch to connect a path e.g. through a park to a centerline when it really only comes up to the sidewalk. 

I think the real problem is the inconsistency.
Jarek 🚲 (2018-05-23 07:00:15+00:00): But, the Lansdowne example showcases the problem, doesn't it?

When you draw a separate sidewalk without a crossing, on Lansdowne it means that crossing is not permitted or safe or sometimes physically possible. But your method would have the same tag of sidewalk without a crossing mean that crossing is allowed everywhere at Galley and Sorauren.

How could a router do this without a ruleset that specifies that for example tertiary roads can be crossed but secondary roads cannot? Such a ruleset would have to be Ontario-specific as elsewhere primary and trunk tags are used for the kind of road that we see on Lansdowne. (London, England has many narrow, slow streets tagged primary that are much safer to cross than the average Toronto avenue.) Isn't it easier to just use a tagging scheme that doesn't require routers guessing?

I also don't see a problem with mapping a perpendicular path to centerline, especially with the sidewalk is not mapped in the first place. Slip roads are mapped to centerline (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23000751) without much controversy.
Nate Wessel (2018-05-23 14:09:03+00:00): OK, you might have convinced me. It seems like my point is moot so long as marked crossings are still indicated as nodes on the centerline: e.g. you can cross Lansdowne at West Lodge Park or at Dundas but not in between. That could be guessed from an absence of marked crossings on a secondary... though I don't know of any routers that currently use the necessary logic to make that work. 

I wonder if this is a discussion that should be had over on the sidewalks wiki page? The consensus as I understand it doesn't seem to address some of the points raised here and leaves open both options without a good way of integrating them.
Jarek 🚲 (2018-05-28 17:45:52+00:00): Hm, the best places I can think of for the discussion would be talk-ca mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca or maybe tagging https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging though then you have to account for worldwide usage

There is forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ but the Canadian section is dead and I don't see a good tagging section, and the wiki discussions always seem mixed at best...
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:12:56+00:00): Hi jeison smith, welcome to OSM. Please only map what's on the ground. Don't create fictive data! #vandalism

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55906351
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:20:01+00:00): Hi jeison smith, welcome to OSM. Please only map what's on the ground. Don't create fictive data! #vandalism
Spanholz (2018-01-30 20:42:20+00:00): Thanks for restoring the driveways. I appreciate your work :)
Maybe you should call the Data Working Group for this user. He doesn't seem to react on the changeset comments
freebeer (2018-01-30 21:30:08+00:00): No, I don't think so.  Constable and I have been working together with this user in her (guessing from username, may be his) area in the hopes of getting a good mapper by example.
I've a new - no, now two new messages awaiting me, first titled `apologies' so I'm giving meself a bit of time to get back in the frisky mood that defiled a fair number of bug-report Notes earlier, and mentally compose a proper response.
First I have to figure out how to parse the timestamps  on the original changeset into a 24-hour format I understand better, ooh me brane
Thanks for keeping an eye on other user contributions and engaging with them in a friendly way, a skill I lack...
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:20:20+00:00): Hi jeison smith, welcome to OSM. Please only map what's on the ground. Don't create fictive data! #vandalism
viloan (2018-01-30 20:01:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-01-30 21:04:38+00:00): Let op plakken. De landuse Industrial zit geplakt aan een gebouw. Je krijgt dan ellende bij verschuivingen.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55906705

Ik zal het even losmaken.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:07:12+00:00): landuse Industrial en residential liggen weer los.
MØRK (2018-01-30 21:08:59+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip, zal er de volgende keer op letten!
eggie (2018-01-30 21:17:32+00:00): Editor iD is berucht wegens z'n plakken. Goed inzoomen dus. Editor potlatch2 plakt niet. Zelf raden we JOSM aan. Plakt ook, maar het ook zo weer los.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Bedankt voor je reactie...
surveyor54 (2018-01-31 22:50:05+00:00): Revert CS 55906763, Pokémon-Vandalismus
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
andygol (2018-02-04 19:27:22+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55907244
viloan (2018-01-30 20:35:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-31 05:14:21+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55907880
andygol (2018-02-04 19:26:57+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55908169
andygol (2018-02-04 19:23:39+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55908194
Erelen (2018-02-23 18:14:29+00:00): Пожалуйста, обращайте внимание на актуальность спутниковых снимков в непопулярных регионах.
Вы отрисовали дорогу по очень старым снимкам. И эта дорога прекратила существование после извержения 2013 года.
Так что правку я откатываю.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:19:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:26:04+00:00): Construction =house "moet"  er ook nog af. De vorm van de landuse=construction kun je ook nog aanpassen.
viloan (2018-01-30 20:56:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-01-30 21:32:08+00:00): Probeer je edits te beschrijven. Speeltuin is wat summier. Andere mappers willen begrijpen wat je aan het doen bent.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:42:16+00:00): Nog een tip: Je gebruikt de BING foto op de achtergrond. Die ligt echter verschoven. Beter om de Kadaster PDOK te gebruiken. Je kunt in de editmode rechts in het scherm op layers/achtergronden  klikken en het dan veranderen.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:27:35+00:00): Svp geen adressen taggen op gebouwen zelf. Dat geeft verwarring.
De adresnodes zijn al aanwezig. Ik haal het adres weer weg.
eggie (2018-01-30 21:29:08+00:00): adresgegevens en construction helemaal verwijderd
maraf24 (2018-02-03 22:32:12+00:00): A jak się do tego parku w środku ronda wchodzi? Jest jakieś przejście podziemne?
RicoElectrico (2018-02-04 11:44:03+00:00): Skasowałem to, kolega ma nas chyba za idiotów. Możesz przejrzeć resztę jego twórczości, co do której miałem wątpliwości, więc od razu jej nie wywaliłem.
maraf24 (2018-02-04 17:21:46+00:00): Przejrzałem, oraz wszystkie parki z ostatniego tygodnia. Było w zasadzie "normalnie";)
5m4u9 (2018-02-01 20:54:49+00:00): hola alvaro, estov viendo que hiciste algunas alineaciones en varias lugares, hay que hacerlo con ciudado y de forma completa sino quedan todas torcidas las calles, y para eso mejor no hacer... queda inutilizable el mapa
//
caso particular que vi uyuni
eggie (2018-01-30 21:24:26+00:00): Tip: Wanneer de amenity= "kindergarten" hetzelfde is als Domein kunnen de tags samengevoegd worden.
azsr (2018-01-30 21:17:12+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55908833
azsr (2018-01-30 21:18:04+00:00): Hello!
            My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its
            status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error.
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55908833
azsr (2018-01-30 21:16:51+00:00): Hi. Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

In the future, could you use highway=footway rather than highway=pedestrian? highway=footway is better suited for smaller paths, like sidewalks, while highway=pedestrian is better suited for a pedestrian-only commercial zone. Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-31 05:15:51+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55909055
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-31 05:15:14+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55909156
andygol (2018-02-04 19:22:54+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55909358
XimeX (2018-01-31 09:02:35+00:00): Ich hab ein paar Kleinigkeiten behoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55924537
TBKMrt (2018-01-31 22:03:47+00:00): Danke, habe ich gesehen.
Wieso sich die Wege bei der Kreuzung mit der B21 unbedingt in einem Punkt schneiden müssen verstehe ich trotzdem nicht.
XimeX (2018-01-31 22:10:26+00:00): Müssen nicht in einem Punkt schneiden. Aber wenn nicht fällt mir keine gescheite korrekte Variante für das turn:lanes ein
TBKMrt (2018-02-01 21:24:55+00:00): Soweit ich mich erinnere, habe ich sie sogar inkludiert. turn:lanesforward/backward ist so lange zB "left|none" (oder "left|") bis die Möglichkeit zum Abbiegen da war (sprich bis zum zweite Weg).

Wenn sich der Weg nicht in der Mitte treffen 'muss' sieht es aus meiner Sicht besser aus und es gibt die Realität besser wieder. Dass dort vier statt zwei Straßen sind mag dem einen oder anderen nicht gefallen, ich hingegen finde das nicht schlimm.
XimeX (2018-02-02 14:31:18+00:00): Das Problem ist das es ja eigentlich 3 Fahrspuren sind. Wobei die mittlere von beiden Seiten als Abbiegespur verwendet wird. Hat man jetzt in beide Richtungen je 2 turn:lanes angegeben müsste die gesamte lanes Anzahl 4 betragen. Jedoch sind es nur 3.
Hoffe das erklärt meinen tagging Konflikt.
TBKMrt (2018-02-04 08:35:04+00:00): Du hast recht, dass zB JOSM hier einen Konflikt anzeigt. Aber auch nur, weil es (zumindest meines Wissens nach) keine Möglichkeit gibt die Information zu setzen, dass eine Spur doppelt verwendet wird.
Das ist aber dann nicht so sehr ein lanes Problem, sondern dass es nicht mit den richtigen Tags markiert werden kann.

Nachdem es viele solcher Kreuzungen gibt wäre vielleicht sogar ein eigener Tag wie lanes:doubleusage oder so interessant.
XimeX (2018-02-04 09:04:20+00:00): Willst nicht ein Proposal für das Problem erstellen?
TBKMrt (2018-02-04 22:33:34+00:00): Wenn ich ehrlich bin will ich das nicht.
Nicht, dass ich OSM nicht verbessern wollte, sondern ich habe einfach schon gemerkt, dass bei den diesen proposals keine sinnvolle Diskussion zustande kommt und dann sich einer drein mischt und sagt, dass er das entweder ganz anders gemacht wird, oder dass 'es (die Verbindung zu einem Punkt) so gehört'.

Eine gute Portion Aufwand dafür dass zum Schluss nichts dabei raus schaut. Danke, aber da kann ich gleich einem Politiker zuhören.
Constable (2018-01-31 08:55:41+00:00): Hi there, I just noticed your tens of notes here. Why did you add the access=no to this section? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53533705
We at OSM have to map things how they are on the ground and the access=no should be used when "no access" signs are in place. Is this the case?
Thanks
Constable (2018-01-31 09:15:41+00:00): ciao, grazie per aver rimosso il doppione. Io però L'U2 lo etichetterei come supermarket, non come department store
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=department%20store?uselang=it
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
Cosa ne pensi?
ciao
Constable (2018-02-18 20:22:59+00:00): la mia osservazione è ancora valida
Lukkinohh__ (2018-02-18 21:27:30+00:00): Ok, avresti ragione. Ciao!
Constable (2018-02-18 21:29:29+00:00): sapevo che avresti risposto :D
Grazie per la collaborazione!
Lukkinohh__ (2018-02-18 21:30:26+00:00): Ora bisogna attendere qualche istante prima che si aggiorna. Ciao!
azsr (2018-01-31 15:10:45+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55909575
SomeoneElse (2023-04-22 21:55:50+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that the surface=asphalt on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557136501 might be supposed to be somewhere else?
Cheers,
Andy
will_p (2023-04-22 22:23:07+00:00): Definitely a mistake. Looking at Bing Streetside photos, the layby alongside is asphalt, so I probably intended to tag that.
evod (2018-02-01 06:38:17+00:00): Sorry geocodec, aber imho ist dein Vorgehen beim Adressimport echt nicht OK. An der Leopoldauer Straße und Umgebung sind so gut wie alle Adressen schon vorhanden - und zwar meist auf Häusern. Du hast jetzt eine Menge doppelter nodes hinzugefügt und diverse Häuserpolygone quer über die Straße gezogen (Hausnr. 8, 16, 20, 35,...). Ich hab die Gegend schon ca 2014 gemappt und find das ehrlich gesagt sehr ärgerlich. Bitte mach das asap rückgängig.
user_1470980 (2018-02-01 13:35:45+00:00): Hallo evod,
Danke für den Hinweis, hier hat sich leider meine JAVA Laufzeitumgebung verabschiedet, und JOSM in den Abrund gezogen. Werde umgehend mit dem Aufräumen beginnen.
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:39:15+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
HiddeWie (2020-09-26 18:01:48+00:00): I noticed that many buildings contain wall=null. This tag does not make sense and should be removed.
Thanks in advance.