piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
renuka1 (2018-07-03 03:14:29+00:00): test
renuka1 (2018-07-03 03:17:00+00:00): test2
eggie (2018-07-02 09:52:18+00:00): Je hebt oneway= yes vervangen door oneway=no.. 
Is dit  veranderd?
De uitzonderingen eenrichtingsverkeer  voor tweewielers staan er echter nog wel op. Verder heb je toegevoegd lanes=0  Dat klopt niet. 
Over de brug loopt ook een fietsroute.. 
Ik zal wat aanpassen.
eggie (2018-07-02 10:00:08+00:00): uitzonderingsrestricties oneway:bicycle en moped verwijderd. lanes=0 verwijderd. moped=yes toegevoegd.
DaveF (2018-12-15 20:16:44+00:00): Hi
Please be aware tags shouldn't be place on the ways of relations that have the same tag as it prevents them from being rendered accurately. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604169880/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8421822#map=16/51.3488/-0.9919
eggie (2018-07-02 09:35:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-02 09:39:15+00:00): De niet doorgaande routes in de wijken zou je ook nog op highway=residential kunnen zetten i.p.v. unclassified.
MVG,
Eggie
PulisakZ (2019-02-19 12:50:48+00:00): Hi. 

You have changed name of a track but there are two different names on some segments: Bishop Break and Bishops Break. 
What is correct? 


Thank you!
andrewfr (2019-02-24 09:33:57+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. It is Bishops Break. I've corrected this.
PulisakZ (2019-02-25 08:00:29+00:00): Thank you!
renuka1 (2018-07-03 03:18:50+00:00): test3
dgitto (2018-07-02 10:22:34+00:00): fixed position and elevation (DTM & CTR)
mbe57 (2018-07-02 11:06:04+00:00): Grazie
stephankn (2018-07-02 19:59:12+00:00): Thanks for trying to help improving OSM. Please try to contact some local mappers nearby to get some guidance in how to best tag features. The way "ถนนทางเข้า - ออก โรงเรียนเวียงชัยวิทยามค" is a service road in a school yard. Tagging it as a major highway is quite wrong. I corrected it to the better fitting tagging highway=service. I am also a bit uncertain about the name of it. Is it really named like this? If so, the name is right. But to me it sounds more like you are describing the features, which is something we don't use the name tag for in OSM. Similar the canteen in the school. It describes that it's the canteen, it's not the name of it. So I recommend you revisit it and remove the descriptions. Building names 1-3 are a bit tricky. Maybe "addr:housename" is a better fit for them. Also check the geometry of building 1. Is it really shaped like this? Digital Globe Premium hints that the building is rectangular like the other and just covered by some nearby trees. As you are improving the geometry: Please also make the buildings have a right angle. Use the "Square" tool in the iD menu.
WomoMap (2018-07-26 05:20:06+00:00): I have made a mistake in adding the source "map.geo.admin.ch" witch was only the base info for my trip. The data I entered is from my on experience and actually I am the source.
gscscnd (2018-07-02 10:58:58+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że `placement=left_of:1` nie jest prawidłowe np. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464521632
sorbovit (2018-07-02 12:04:35+00:00): Faktycznie może i jest tagiem nadmiarowym, ale nie widzę żeby rodził jakieś problemy …
gscscnd (2018-07-02 12:30:46+00:00): Taki tag oznacza, że linia w OSM znajduje się tam, gdzie lewa krawędź pierwszego (tu jedynego) pasa ruchu (zamiast domyślnego _na środku całej drogi_). Używasz stylu „Lane and road attributes”?
ma-rt-in (2018-07-02 14:45:36+00:00): Hallo,
könntest du von way 604191297 die Adresse wieder an das Gebäude kleben. Da gehört die schlielich hin. ;)
XY22 (2018-07-02 19:28:50+00:00): erledigt
eggie (2018-07-02 09:40:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-02 09:44:27+00:00): Svp niet met de kaart schuiven in de editmodus. Dat levert nog al eens schade op door onbedoeld verschuiven.
Je hebt ook de basisschool Het Spectrum van de adresnode  verwijderd. Klopt dat wel?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-07-02 09:45:09+00:00): excuus.. je hebt 'm er juist bijgezet. Prima edit.
eggie (2018-07-02 17:02:17+00:00): PB contact
PT-53 (2018-07-27 04:39:04+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
in keepright werden hier einige Nodes ohne Haupt-Attribut angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.13639&lon=9.63872&zoom=11&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C193%2C195%2C196%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C20
Die gleichen Hinweise kommen auch im OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.82608&lat=48.18872&zoom=16&opacity=0.76&overlays=no_feature_tag_nodes,no_feature_tag_ways
Eventuell könnte dort office=company (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office) ergänzt werden?

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?

Grüße
Peter
corfede (2018-07-02 20:53:26+00:00): Hi Ole, this waterway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604198693 (that I can't see on the sat photos)  passes over different roads, so you should indicate where there are bridges or where there is a ford. Thank you, Federico
Ole (2018-07-04 05:18:28+00:00): I've corrected the tunnel and fords. 
It's a dry river bed which only has water after heavy heavy rain falls. It may only have water every 10 years or so. Being a Physical Geographer, I can clearly identify this geomorphological feature on the sat image. Trust me.
corfede (2018-07-04 06:23:22+00:00): Sure I believe you, because even where I live in the south of Salento there is the same type of waterways. Thanks for the corrections.
aceman444 (2020-11-01 13:23:22+00:00): Zdravim, prosim nenicte krizovatky a priechody pre chodcov. Napr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1327270286 ste zmenili crossing=traffic_signals na crossing=zebra, cim ste stratili informaciu o semaforoch pre chodcov. Ale chapem, ze to skor urobil ten otrasny editor iD, a ze odvtedy ste uz presli na JOSM.

A ked pridavate vetvy ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604205406 (ktore podla mna neboli potrebne), treba prislusne upravit zakazy odbocenia a znacky turn:lanes. Dakujem
MikeN (2018-07-30 22:13:33+00:00): Why were these driveways reverted to construction state?
ashleyannmathew (2018-07-31 09:41:45+00:00): Hi Mike,
Thanks for your query. I have reverted the highway back to service. I am working on fixing  all highway topology errors across the US, where crossing highway is one of them. Crossing highways are highways that cross each other without a common node at its intersection. While fixing it in this area, I saw that the area was under construction under satellite imagery and missed your source mentioned as "Survey". Hence, reverted back the changes.
MikeN (2018-07-31 11:01:43+00:00): Thank you - Bing has been updated since that survey and it is clearer that the shopping center is already built and was not mapped from planning document papers.
ashleyannmathew (2018-07-31 11:25:58+00:00): Yes, thank you for the update
berndw (2018-07-08 08:12:08+00:00): Hallo an_dyb

Willkommen bei OSM

Wenn Du Objekte wie dieses in OSM eintragen möchtest, wäre es vielleicht angebracht vorher im Wiki passende Schlüssel/Werte-Paare zu suchen
In diesem Fall wäre
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:military%3Dbunker
zumindest ein Anfang.
Der Schlüssel historic mit freien Text kann nicht sinnvoll ausgewertet werden, deswegen wird Dein Objekt niemals in einer Karte sichtbar sein

Wenn Du Fragen, einfach eine Nachricht an mich, ich versuche Dir zu helfen

Bernd
Jose Luis Infante (2018-07-02 22:16:22+00:00): Hola!
Aquesta botiga és de roba de casa, no? La botiga que hi ha a Montigalà té més varietat de roba (samarretes, pantalons, etc). Crec que la millor etiqueta és houseware.
Saluts!
atcomapper (2018-07-02 12:49:15+00:00): Undlad venligst at flytte rundt på adressepunkter i Danmark, de bliver automatisk importeret fra Danmarks Adresseregister
Troelses (2018-07-02 14:16:58+00:00): Det var en fejl. Fik klikket forkert. Troede faktisk ikke punktet fik rykket sig, men burde nok have dobbelttjekket.
atcomapper (2018-07-02 14:31:13+00:00): Det var også kun en lille smule, men jeg har rykket det tilbage igen :)
Hjart (2018-07-02 15:40:19+00:00): Rigtig mange begyndere laver den slags "numre". Man skal lige lære at være opmærksom på hvor man sætter musen, når man vil trække i kortet ;-)
dgitto (2018-07-02 12:08:27+00:00): Benissimo, grazie. Della key "constellation" in effetti non esiste nessuna occorrenza in OSM. Non c'è problema: se vuoi la lasci. Però sarebbe giusto "constellation" (attualmente manca una N)
GRUBERND (2018-07-03 11:51:50+00:00): Hi gerhard81, may i ask why you deleted the paths in this area? they are clearly visible in the aerial images and i have walked them. i did not have a GPS back than.
gerhard81 (2018-07-04 06:41:36+00:00): Hi Grubernd! 
Sorry if you did a survey - did not recognize this in the history.
Floating ways are causing an error on the keep right map.
A path could be there but it might also be a (dried or intermittent) waterway - there were some similar problems in the Aussee district: putting paths in the map without doing any survey or having any knowledge. If you did a survey on this track can you please connect it to the other ones and set a fixme?
Greetings
GRUBERND (2018-07-04 06:55:01+00:00): hi, thank you for the update - ah, keepright, the "we know better" dictator of mapping.

well, i did the floating tracks because i didnt have a GPS with me at the time in the 90ies, but as some parts are well visible, the path is still there. and part of the way from Königreichalm to Landfriedalm goes across the little meadows where it is not visible in the aerial images.
i was hesitant to just draw a "random" straight line there, but i guess that is the best solution.
Carto'Cité (2018-07-23 09:31:52+00:00): Bonjour Thomas.
tu as mis le tag bicycle=yes sur cet escalier : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604215260. La clef bicycle est une clef déclinée de access et réservée à décrire autorisations et interdictions. Est-ce que tu veux indiquer par là qu'il y a une rampe pour les vélos (ramp:bicycle=yes) ?
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
eggie (2018-07-02 11:35:48+00:00): Niet  verkeerd. 
Wel is het zo dat je vlakken op die landuse wel ziet op de standaardkaart van OSM, maar niet op de afgeleide kaarten. Vlak op vlak rendert dan niet.
Voor de toekomst zou ik dan eens kijken naar werken met multipolygonen.
Dat werkt het simpelst met editor JOSM.
Zo'n playground-vlak staat dan als inner in een outerrelatie. Niet iets om je nu mee bezig te houden. 
Water in bos zou anders bv een beeld door elkaar geven.
Ik zal de pitch als voorbeeld in een multipolygoon zetten.
eggie (2018-07-02 11:45:36+00:00): Kijk voor hoe je playgrounds mapt in Wiki playgrounds: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground

Daar staat precies welke keys en values je hoort te gebruiken.

Je algemene tags zijn eigenlijk altijd in het Engels. Klimrek klinkt een beetje Nederlands.
gnlpfth (2021-03-12 11:45:27+00:00): Hallo, die Johann-Ströck-Straße ist ganz woanders als die hier eingetragenene Ladestation. Existiert diese Station hier überhaupt und ist sie korrekt benannt? LG
TBKMrt (2021-03-13 15:37:51+00:00): Ich habe die Information zum Zeitpunkt des Eintrages von der Webseite von WienEnergie kopiert. Ich habe dabei immer darauf geachtet, dass die Position zu der auf der Karte passt.
Wenn dort keine Ladestation ist würde mich das nicht wundern, weil die Webseite von WienEnergie notorisch schlecht ist. Die Ladestationen weisen teilweise falsche Informationen wie Anschlussleistung oder eben auch Position. Teilweise sind die Ladestationen auf der Karte der WienEnergie Webseite um einen Kilometer daneben gelegen. Es kann also durchaus sein, dass die Ladestation nie an dieser Stelle war und auch an dieser Stelle keine Ladestation ist.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Jose Luis Infante (2018-07-02 22:14:47+00:00): Hola!
Hi ha una etiqueta per una botiga de cortines. Ho he consultat amb la comunitat, i l'etiqueta que has afegit sera la més adient.
Saluts!
nevw (2018-07-02 12:39:58+00:00): Hi
This area appears to be conserved for its natural value.
Landuse=forest is for land that is used for forestry not conservation presevation.
Perhaps natural=wood would be a more suitable tag. I am not local to the and have only used the internet for my information of Roachdale Reserve
Malco! (2018-07-02 22:07:31+00:00): I agree with nevw's comments and will alter the tag: natural = wood.
user_5359 (2018-07-02 14:27:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry?
viloan (2018-07-02 11:40:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2018-07-03 13:03:44+00:00): Hallo asdf2,
Du hast in SIG Teilabschnitte der Alte Krauchenwieser Straße zusammengefaßt. Was hat das mit > OSMI: fix unconnected roads < zu tun ?
Ich kann im OSM-Inspector keinen entspr.Hinweis finden.
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-07-10 04:16:11+00:00): Hallo asdf2, 
ich warte noch auf Deine Antwort.
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-07-17 04:05:09+00:00): Hallo asdf2, 
es gehört zum Guten Ton bei OSM, daß man auf Anfragen auch antwortet!
Bekomme ich noch eine Antwort ?
Fragende Grüße
Piz Pachific (2018-07-22 23:17:38+00:00): Hallo PT-53

Keine Panik, ich war nur in den wohlverdienten Ferien ;-b 

Da war wohl der Changeset-Kommentar nicht ganz vollständig, resp. ich hatte gerade noch etwas anderes "verbessert", was mir ins Auge fiel. Um die OSM-Datenbank zu entschlaken, fasse ich jeweils Wege mit denselben Tags+Relationen(nachfolgend) zusammen. Wenn hier etwas schief gelaufen ist, entschuldige ich mich dafür und führe es auf meine neuere Verwendung vom iD-Editor zurück. Werde demnach wieder zurück zum JOSM wechseln, bei welchem diese Dinge besser ersichtlich sind.

Weil deine Anfrage schon etwas zurück liegt, frage ich nun mal, ob es noch was zu korrigieren/reverten gibt?

Lieber Gruss
PT-53 (2018-07-23 05:22:36+00:00): Hallo asdf2,
ich hoffe Du hast Dich gut erholt und bist wieder fit für OSM und entschuldige bitte meine Ungeduld.
Ich habe leider erst nach meiner "Erinnerung" genauer nachgeschaut und gesehen, daß die Straßenstücke - vor Deiner Zusammenfassung - wohl doch nicht korrekt verbunden waren.
Sorry und Grüße
Piz Pachific (2018-07-24 23:38:11+00:00): Na dann ist es ja gut. Keine Ursache....
eggie (2018-07-02 12:31:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-02 12:38:15+00:00): Je track had geen verbindingsnode met het fietspad en de residentialroad zuidelijker. Het zal dus niet routeren op deze manier. Altijd een verbindingsnode maken met kruisende wegen. Ook zat de track vastgeplakt aan dat stukje bos. Ik heb het losgemaakt en de track verbonden met de kruisende wegen.
Verder heeft een track altijd een tracktype.
tracktype=grade1  bij verhard en tracktype=grade5 bij nauwelijks zichtbaar. Zie wegeigenschappen in welkomstmail.
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-07-02 12:55:22+00:00): Voor de juiste routering nog even een verbinding gemaakt met het industrieterrein en tevens oneway verwijderd van de fietsverbinding tussen de Laanzichtweg en fietspad Zuiderzeestraatweg.
Poretsew (2018-07-07 15:49:02+00:00): Beste Jaap,

Er zijn parkeerterreinen in de wijk (die ik had ingetekend) verdwenen bij deze wijzigingenset. Is het mogelijk om dit nog te repareren/reviseren?

Groet,
West Erop
dvdhoven (2018-07-07 17:10:29+00:00): Ik heb de changeset terug gedraaid. (reverted)
Eén van de grondregels van OSM is respect voor elkaars werk.
Als je vindt dat de parkeerterreinen niet moeten worden ingetekend, ga dan in overleg met de mapper, die ze heeft ingetekend, maar gooi ze niet zonder meer weg.
Je kunt ook denken, ik zou ze niet intekenen, maar gewoon denken van dit is een gebied van een ander en als die ze wel wil intekenen, prima.
Persoonlijk kan ik geen redenen bedenken waarom ze niet ingetekend moeten worden.
Het enige wat ooit in het forum is besproken is het taggen van parkeerplaatsen langs een straat en dat dat niet moet.
dvdhoven (2018-07-07 17:11:49+00:00): Bovendien wordt het met de parkeerplaatsen duidelijk wat de functie van die lege vlakjes is.
dvdhoven (2018-07-07 18:16:07+00:00): Reverted met changeset 60493237
Poretsew (2018-07-07 18:56:28+00:00): Bedankt dvdhoven.
MapMakerGal (2018-07-02 12:43:22+00:00): Pequeño error en la escritura, para V-14 se usa "nat_ref=V-14"
t_ja (2018-07-02 17:10:05+00:00): Ďakujem za opravy (aj ďalšie vylepšenia), pôvodný "vandal" sa od mojej pripomienky ku kvalite/zmyslu jeho úprav už neozval: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59903277
MapMakerGal (2018-07-02 12:42:42+00:00): Pequeño error en la escritura, para V-14 se usa "nat_ref=V-1.4"
MapMakerGal (2018-07-02 12:43:38+00:00): Pequeño error en la escritura, para V-14 se usa "nat_ref=V-14"
atcomapper (2018-07-02 12:48:02+00:00): Adresser i DK bliver opdateret automatisk med data fra Danmarks Adresseregister. Hvis du mener der er en fejl, skal du venligst kontakte Ballerup Kommune, som kan rette en evt. fejl i Danmarks Adresseregister.
Pink Duck (2018-07-02 12:35:24+00:00): Not sure what happened there, was uploaded in JOSM with title "Store closure (signs remain)" and source "survey".
Harry Wood (2018-07-02 12:41:51+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?feedItem=user-uLgO7Oym0bF2GZxd7aprUA-activity-user-uLgO7Oym0bF2GZxd7aprUA-publishing_done-image%3A1530528511310&pKey=-CA6Dey3961m1HxshEZtug&lat=51.55436411200003&lng=-0.11794870080007058&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.4569688898595377&y=0.5228170695479089&zoom=0.18526013765967034
MapMakerGal (2018-07-02 12:43:03+00:00): Pequeño error en la escritura, para V-14 se usa "nat_ref=V-14"
Moshkov (2018-07-02 12:53:48+00:00): What a great [site](http://www.mundiario.com/articulo/economia/economia-espanola-otono-2015-y-prestamosmomento/20151210135143050644.html)
Hjart (2018-07-03 07:16:51+00:00): Bemærk at det altid er en fejl kun at forbinde veje til kanten af p-pladser, sådan som du har gjort i forbindelse med f.eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604246859. P-pladser regnes ikke i sig selv for navigerbare og derfor skal veje føres ind over dem. Ellers kommer navigation ikke til at fungere optimalt. Jeg har rettet det her.
hoserab (2018-07-02 13:44:31+00:00): This road has a name; why did you delete it?
corinag_telenav (2018-07-02 13:58:51+00:00): I considered this road to be a roundabout and that's why I removed its name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout#Naming). If you have any knowledge of it not being a roundabout, I will add the name and one way tags back.Thank you
hoserab (2018-07-02 14:18:40+00:00): Just because you "considered this road to be a roundabout" doesn't me it is. That the road was tagged with a name ought to have been your first clue that you shouldn't have tagged it as a junction and deleted the name. Don't worry about changing it back, I've already fixed the mistake. Please be more careful about verifying the veracity of your edits.
corinag_telenav (2018-07-02 14:24:21+00:00): I will be, thank you
spiregrain (2018-07-02 14:56:17+00:00): Hi there - not all of The Street (way 179433150) is indoors.  From memory, the block bit between M&S and H&M is outside/uncovered.
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-02 20:16:21+00:00): Hi, yes, you're right. The entrance is by Fat Face. My intention was to only touch the bit under car park C, but it seems i got carried away. I'll fix it, thanks.
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-02 20:22:30+00:00): Actually, i think it's ok -- is there something i missed?
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-02 20:23:06+00:00): (There's an H&M inside and out -- i left the outside one.)
spiregrain (2018-07-02 20:35:05+00:00): I'm pretty sure the steps ( Way: 130855539 ) are outside; that Starbucks is (just) inside; and that WH Smith is inside (so probably misplaced at present).  I'll have a look next time I'm at the station.
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-02 20:54:48+00:00): Yeah, i think they are.  Not sure about WH Smith.  It's' underground so it's not infeasible it's there.  So far i've just tried to tidy up the existing tagging.
spiregrain (2018-07-07 17:09:25+00:00): I've added a changeset now that I think places the wall in the right place.   It's a bit along the eastern wall of fatface.  changeset 60493294.
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-07 19:23:37+00:00): Cool, thanks.

What's https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132072543 ?
yourealwaysbe (2018-07-07 19:28:10+00:00): Oh, i see it's been there for years.  I guess it used to be a shop that's now vacant?  Though i noticed the previous tagging would add otherwise unlabelled building to fill up space.
spiregrain (2018-07-07 19:45:21+00:00): It's got something like building min level = -1, so I guess it's on the floor below.
fkv (2018-07-19 23:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60886195 where the changeset comment is: revert 60347728
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].