piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-02-09 12:42:44+00:00): Hallo BSG SA, 
bitte entschuldige, wenn ich etwas ungeduldig bin. Es ist aber so, daß mit jedem Tag der vorbeigeht eine Rücksetzung der doppelten Eingaben aus diesem Änderungssatz schwieriger und aufwendiger werden kann.
Grüße
BSG SA (2022-02-09 15:03:59+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
entschuldige das hatte ich gestern nicht mehr gesehen. 
Ja, wenn du das machen würdest, sehr gerne.
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-09 15:10:57+00:00): Grenzlinien-Doubletten aus diesem CS gelöscht in CS 117207155:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117207155#map=10/48.4198/9.4402
Grüße
BSG SA (2022-02-09 16:15:06+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Konkon153 (2022-02-04 20:38:35+00:00): [ und damit alle 190 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Mustin vollständig angepasst ]
SHARCRASH (2022-02-05 14:19:03+00:00): Hi! Why would that path be forbidden to bicycles? There is no sign stating that, no regulation....
Jorisbo (2022-02-05 18:56:26+00:00): Hello SHARCRASH ! , thx for the chat. I actually myself don't think it is forbidden but the original tagging was the 'exotic' value 'impassable' which is difficult to understand for automated routing. The path climbs up to steep paths so translated to a non interpretable "no" was best in my opinion. A class:bicycle =  -3 or class:bicycle.mtb=2 would be preferable. If you no the ground trought? help me out. Kind regards, joris
SHARCRASH (2022-02-05 20:10:10+00:00): Oh i realise now my error! I used bicycle=impassable instead of smoothness=impassable which is not "exotic" :) It is associated to more than 2 millions ways and fairly simple to implement to any routing service. Thanks for the hint! I will correct the tag and change yours to bicycle=dismount.

Yeah I've been on the terrain.
Nearby0051 (2022-02-04 21:11:22+00:00): Sicher dass die Website so passt?
hauke-stieler (2022-02-04 21:18:43+00:00): Diese vermaledeite Zwischenablage :D Gut aufgepasst, habs direkt korrigiert.
kartler175 (2022-02-05 12:42:23+00:00): Weisst Du, was Du da tust: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.49416&lat=52.79518&zoom=11&opacity=0.95 ?
wireguy (2022-03-07 19:28:33+00:00): Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg relation 8106707 is broken
NFZANMNIM (2022-03-07 20:16:28+00:00): fixed this too, thanks
Stereo (2023-10-11 15:14:45+00:00): Hi! Lepa Brena is the local name for this building: https://oralhistorykosovo.org/points_of_interests/elektro-kosova-lena-brena/
wislander (2023-01-15 02:56:59+00:00): Hi yasobara,

When I hiked this section in summer 2021, the prior alignment of the trail was correct. Was the short section between the I-90 overpass and the parking lot decommissioned since then?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117023001
yasobara (2023-01-15 17:16:05+00:00): Hi wislander,
You are correct. I found a GPS track created in summer of 2022 and I modified the path using it to restore the short section you mentioned.
wislander (2023-01-15 18:13:29+00:00): Oh good! Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117023001
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
FredrikLindseth (2022-12-15 09:13:15+00:00): Jeg syntes det er litt ivrig å bryte alle sykkelveiene i alle kryssene her.  Slik tagging er ikke standarden i Norge i alle fall. Å tagge sykkelveiene med `no` eller `separate` altså i hvert kryss. Nå er jo alle sykkelveien brutt opp over alt og jeg tipper det fører til at alle sykkelkartene og sykkelrouterene.
voiden (2022-12-15 12:44:52+00:00): godt mulig du har rett, og uansett er dette neppe vits å bruke tid på. når det er sagt vet jeg ikke om det gjør så mye skade heller. jeg regner med at rutere fortsatt vil foretrekke denne veien over andre, siden den faktisk har sykkelfelt. og om det var to parallelle veier, der den første hadde bedre sykkelmerking gjennom kryssene enn den andre burde jo ruteren foretrekke den første.
user_2066394 (2022-02-04 21:43:39+00:00): Geht auch :-) Tatsache ist, ohne weitere Survey können wir nicht einfach beliebig weit zurückbauen
TomPar (2022-02-07 02:10:00+00:00): Hello.  This is not a valid edit.  The "name" field should not be used as a composite of the common name and MIT building number.  Please provide further justification why you think the building reference # should be in there.  Thanks.
user_5359 (2022-02-06 08:21:44+00:00): Hello! I modify your typo add:unit to addr:unit. But I miss the addr:street and addr:housenumber value.
eggie (2022-02-05 07:16:09+00:00): Dag Wolter.. Op de aansluitende paden staat bicycle=no Mag je dan hier wel fietsen?
MVG
eggie
WoltervdV (2022-02-06 18:00:25+00:00): Nee, je mag hier inderdaad officieel niet fietsen. Dan heb ik dat verkeerd aangegeven.
eggie (2022-02-06 18:02:22+00:00): Oke... Je kunt 't zelf aanpassen..
Mapse..
Eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-22 12:39:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9477104830

shop=pick_up ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
MikeN (2022-02-05 13:21:51+00:00): This changeset had review requested.  Putnam and Baldwin county borders were broken when the county boundary was removed from Big Cedar creek.  At times, water features are tied to administrative boundaries, so take care when removing those.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-10 13:58:40+00:00): You removed the road connection
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117024706
eggie (2022-02-05 07:05:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingverkeer. Is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen  oneway:bicycle=no  en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-05 07:12:43+00:00): Uitzonderingen tweewielers toegevoegd heb ik toegevoegd.
mvg
eggie
KC1973 (2022-02-05 07:38:54+00:00): Dank voor her bericht. Ik ga het doornemen.
Het is inderdaad 1 richting behalve voor fietsers.

Grt
eggie (2022-02-05 07:42:55+00:00): Oke... ik heb het inmiddels aangepast.
Je 'moet' maar eens kijken hoe ik dat heb gedaan ter Leering ende Vermaeck
Bedankt voor je reactie..
Mapse
Eggie
KC1973 (2022-02-08 21:34:30+00:00): @eggie excuses, de vermeerstraat blijkt (terug)veranderd te zijn naar tweerichtingsverkeer.
Ruijsdaelstraat blijft wel 1 richting.
eggie (2022-02-08 21:38:15+00:00): Oke.. Ik heb het al aangepast
gr eggie
kuhni74 (2022-12-05 20:06:45+00:00): vielen Dank für die Höhenangabe, ich habe nun auch auf diversen Wikipedia-Seiten die korrekte Höhe nachgeführt
Frans S (2022-05-19 14:41:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117025083
secondaryhighway (2023-09-04 14:16:33+00:00): Hi, I was wondering is there any reason you mapped these buildings with building=yes;residential instead of building=residential?
Sorry for commenting on a year old changeset.
Ray29 (2023-09-04 21:40:18+00:00): Hi, I think I tagged it that by accident, feel free to change it. I'm busy right now, and I don't have time to fix it, sorry.
secondaryhighway (2023-09-05 00:26:39+00:00): Hello, thats fine, I’ll edit these to just building=residential.
MikeN (2022-02-04 23:30:05+00:00): Please be careful when deleting objects.   This change removed 9 counties in Georgia by breaking the admin boundary.
wkdgs (2022-03-17 17:01:19+00:00): Hi,

ein Weg für Autos zu einem privaten Hinterhofparkplatz ist kein "highway=path", sondern ziemlich eindeutig ein "highway=service".

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
Und: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Ich habe den Weg daher wieder zu einer Grundstückszufahrt geändert.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117025778
RicoElectrico (2022-02-05 14:32:55+00:00): Hej, trochę poprawiłem tę edycję - droga rowerowa nie była podpięta do reszty sieci drogowej, więc ją dołączyłem.
Zbyszek F (2022-02-05 16:21:28+00:00): Ok, dzięki. Zaczynam dopiero przygodę z edycją OSM. :)
jbraggs (2022-02-04 23:24:03+00:00): Correction: Sourced used was Mapillary too.
i2004 (2022-02-04 23:14:38+00:00): perdon ramal golf me equivoque yo
Hungerburg (2022-02-05 19:04:06+00:00): Hallo Mtngy, ich war so frei die Zäune als Schneebrücken zu markieren, und zum Zaun.
Mtngy (2022-02-06 00:53:47+00:00): danke dir
Mundilfari (2022-02-24 02:33:10+00:00): Hello,

what's the source for the Huntington ATM (node 8931845992) moving into the Jewel? Last time I checked this was a drive-thru ATM in the parking lot...that may have changed, but the two imagery sources you listed both show it in the parking lot too, hence the question.

Thanks,
Mundilfari (2022-02-24 03:01:38+00:00): There's more issues with this changeset: 
- The parks you retagged as nature reserves (Foxhill Greens, Forest View, Arrowhead, Fredehagen, William Friedrich, Central, ...)...why? None of them are nature reserves. 
- The Physicians and Dentists shelter along Eagle St. - why trash the name?  That's literally how it is called.
- Also, what's the reason for moving the traffic lights on the Intersection of Aurora Rd and IL59? They were fine the way they were for an intersection of two dual carriageways. Now it looks like there's two lights in each direction?!
eggie (2022-02-06 15:43:42+00:00): Dag Teek.. Waarom landuse=residential later=-1?
Dat laatste lijkt me niet correct.
janolezab (2022-02-04 23:57:57+00:00): "Republic of Frank Mortenson" sounds very unlikely.
TravGW (2022-02-04 23:58:27+00:00): This changeset had been reverted by 117027776
Lee Carré (2022-02-05 07:19:04+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
skquinn (2022-02-06 17:48:24+00:00): It's vandalism; the terse, deceptive changeset comment was likely on purpose.
TravGW (2022-02-04 23:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by 117027776
Lee Carré (2022-02-05 07:18:39+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DP24PH (2022-02-06 15:36:15+00:00): ALERT: Several users may either question the changeset boundaries wherein even a single reversion may occur involving the United States, there is a possibility of encroaching most countries (including the Republic of the Philippines). Your kind understanding is highly appreciated on all costs, and thank you very much.


DP24PH
skquinn (2022-02-06 11:51:27+00:00): Almost every changeset on here is correcting something. The purpose of a changeset comment is to explain *what* you are correcting.
skquinn (2022-02-06 11:54:09+00:00): No wonder... This wasn't a correction. This was vandalism and I can see it has already been reverted.
janolezab (2022-02-05 00:32:23+00:00): Hey, I think the revert is not complete, with that 'name' tag. 117027926 seems not reverted.
janolezab (2022-02-05 00:33:12+00:00): I am sorry, I meant 117027856.
TravGW (2022-02-05 00:37:28+00:00): Thanks, it has been reverted properly this time.
janolezab (2022-02-05 00:43:48+00:00): Thank you 👍
Glassman (2022-02-05 14:14:40+00:00): It looks correct to me. If the entire area is going to be a retail area  then it is appropriate to draw the polygon that way. One minor suggestion - spell out the addr:street name. OSM only uses full spellings no abbreviations - the reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117028113
literan (2022-02-05 21:37:09+00:00): "Пекарня" это не название, а тип заведения.

Никто не говорит "Я покупаю хлеб в пекарне "Пекарня""

исправлю
dunkaist (2022-02-05 22:03:21+00:00): Я не против, исправляй.

На самом заведении написано ПЕКАРНЯ с логотипами по сторонам. Смотрится нелепо, но как есть. Это примерно как если бы на пятёрочке было "5 СУПЕРМАРКЕТ 5".

Mapillary здесь: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.796190555187&lng=37.719239411107&z=17&pKey=2725395934424182&focus=photo
archpdx (2022-02-05 01:41:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding Legacy HS. Quick tip: you can change the background layer in the editor by using the hotkey 'b', which allows you to use some newer imagery. Esri World Imagery seems to be the newest in this area. I would also offset the imagery (scroll to the very bottom of the Background menu) so that it aligns with existing features. If you have any questions or need some help with this don't hesitate to reach out to me.
rthik007 (2022-02-07 11:15:45+00:00): "Hi Springhunk,
I have removed unnecessary roads and changed classifications as based on ground truth
way 1028226219
way 1028226220
way 1028226221
way 1028226222
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117114502.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117028493
Vinber (2026-04-26 09:50:52+00:00): Salut,
j'ai l'impression ici que tu as créé la relation correspondant aux cotes de bordeaux.
Je m'interroge sur de telles relations car cela me semble bien complexe à entretenir et cela ressemble à une collection de bout de vigne, ce qui me semble à éviter pour les relations.
j'ai l'impression que c'est pour pouvoir monter les appellations que tu as mis cela ? quel pourrait être le tag pour les appellations, roi du wiki ?
bonne carto
Frans S (2022-02-05 08:58:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Change the imagery when the imagery is clouded. Maxar P is best to map from on this task.
You mapped small pieces of farmland as being buildings.
Always check if there is a shadow what proofs that the object is above ground level. mostly a building than.
A residential area is to be tagged as landuse=residential. 
I have to revert your mappings. In fact, no buldings are found on this task.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117029116
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-02-05 13:51:22+00:00): Retornada uma via que voce apagou: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/748896119 por favor, não delete vias assim.
kartler175 (2022-02-05 12:30:48+00:00): Das geht auch besser: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.71654&lat=52.27516&zoom=15&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,intersection,intersecting_segments,ways
janolezab (2022-02-05 02:10:05+00:00): There are still many states left: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fNe
Kovoschiz (2022-02-05 04:33:26+00:00): This seems to be a mistake on its own. `flag=` is mostly used for bus stop signs (British term). This info is already included in `wikidata=`. If anything, it should be `flag:wikimedia_commons=` to not worry about the protocol prefix, as in `wikimedia_commons=File:*`. `man_made=flagpole` uses `flag:wikidata=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-05 04:39:14+00:00): Ps easiest method is Find & Replace the data file in a text-based tool.
janolezab (2022-02-05 11:58:04+00:00): Yes, flag is used in two ways.

flag:wikimedia_commons would indeed be better, but that should probably be a mechanical edit at some point in the future.
Lee Carré (2022-02-05 19:35:31+00:00): “Change Wikimedia flag URLs of European states to 'https'”

Why?

Ultimately you're addressing a client-side problem by altering data. That's what HSTS and HTTPS Everywhere are for. The /^https/ is a pseudo-protocol, after all. /^http[^s]/ is more robust & future-proof (when encryption is done using the default port, over the same original connection, to preserve more port numbers (closer to 2¹⁶ for other uses (instead of 2⁸, because each protocol demands 2)).
Besides, not all User-Agents need encryption (bots).

You're also defeating caching for a resource which is ideal for caching.

So, I don't see anything being gained by this changeset.

Worse, the bbox is nebulous. Would've been much better to change each nation individually. That would enable separate discussions.
janolezab (2022-02-05 20:01:21+00:00): "Why?"
"http:" links refer to unencrypted HTTP resources and should not appear anywhere where TLS is available. You just assume the client would know to use https instead, but this is not always the case. So let me put your question the other way round. Why should it stay "http"?

"Besides, not all User-Agents need encryption (bots)."
They do, because Wikimedia does not support unencrypted HTTP connections. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/HTTPS for more info.

"the bbox is nebulous."
Which is the case every time you edit France or the United Kingdom.

Separating the edits would generate more edits in almost every watched bounding box.

I could understand the whish to remove the "flag" tags everywhere. But not the whish to keep "http" links.
woodpeck (2022-02-07 09:14:41+00:00): Wide-ranging and automated edits like this need to be discussed with the community in advance as per our mechanical editing policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct).
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-07 09:14:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117109398 where the changeset comment is: reverting undiscussed mechanical edit
janolezab (2022-02-07 09:18:56+00:00): This changeset was done manually with iD.

Yes, it could be considered wide-ranging. Which is but out of scope for the wiki article you posted.
Lee Carré (2022-02-14 20:43:55+00:00): > "http:" links refer to unencrypted HTTP resources

Incorrect. You clearly didn't read what I stated, or didn't comprehend it.

Only the L7 protocol is specified. Encryption is another matter. You're assuming that HTTP is non-encrypted, based on the HTTPS pseudo-protocol. There are actually several modes of encryption for HTTP.

Compare IMAP with STARTTLS.

> should not appear anywhere where TLS is available.

Based on anything other than your preference or opinion? Particularly since I gave examples earlier.

You just assume the client would know to use https instead

Not at all. You're projecting.

> this is not always the case.

Which is fine, and up to the client. Authoritarianism and know-better-than-the-reader-what's-best-for-him doesn't belong on the Web; by design.

> So let me put your question the other way round. Why should it stay "http"?

Already answered that. See my earlier response.

The burden of proof is yours; you're asserting that s/^http:/https:/g should be so. This is your changeset, too.

> "Besides, not all User-Agents need encryption (bots)."
> They do, because Wikimedia does not support unencrypted HTTP connections. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/HTTPS for more info.

LOL, you assume much.

Besides scope, Wikipedia insisting on HTTPS isn't a matter of the bot (assuming one which is concerned about fetching from WP) itself needing HTTP+TLS, but the site requiring it. The bot would be perfectly happy without.

Wikipedia does indeed respond to TCP/80, else how does it redirect to TCP/443 ?

Sounds like you don't understand relevant networking, either.

> "the bbox is nebulous."
> Which is the case every time you edit France or the United Kingdom.

Relevance for this changeset?

> Separating the edits would generate more edits in almost every watched bounding box.

Perhaps (but evidence?), but they would be scored, and more locally relevant, allowing independent discussion, like I already said.

Your failure to read documentation causes extra changesets, due to the needed reversion.

> I could understand the whish to remove the "flag" tags everywhere. But not the whish to keep "http" links.

That's not a technical or OSM matter / problem.
berndw (2022-02-05 09:56:32+00:00): Hallo mkesko86

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, etwas spät ;-)

Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen zu Deinen Änderungen, das gilt auch für alle vorherigen Änderungen.

Bitte verbinde keine Linienobjekte wie Straßen mit Flächenobjekten, insbesondere Landuse.

Zur Erklärung, es ist dann wesentlich schwieriger Änderungen an einem von beiden vorzunehmen, da man dann erst die richtige Linie finden muss.

Außerdem gehen Felder o.ä. nicht bis mitten auf die Straße sondern enden in einer gewissen Entfernung, da meist noch ein zu Straße gehörender Grünstreifen und/oder ein Graben vorhanden ist. Noch ungünstiger ist es, wenn ein Tor in der Fläche mit gemeinsamen Knoten zur Straße ist, hier kann barrier=* das Routing über die Straße komplett sperren.

Man kann aber,  Du hast es schon gemacht, Flächen, auch über die Straße hinweg, mit anderen Flächen verbinden.

Größere Straßen sollten aber aus der Fläche ausgespart werden, diese Vorgehensweise wird mittlerweile akzeptiert.

Die durch den Renderer erzeugten Lücken bei Straßen sind unschön, aber noch nicht zu ändern. Vielleicht irgendwann wenn man die Straßenfläche zusätzlich zur Linie sinnvoll erfassen kann.

Betroffene Flächen/Straßen im Raum Puderbach findest du hier.
https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=wayareaconflicts-rlp&layer=wayareaconflict#50.59185,7.58984,13z

Trotzdem viel Spaß beim Mappen
Bernd
krusefahrer (2022-04-30 20:29:04+00:00): Hi aimo,

the name is already at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229024709 !
Muhmaker (2022-02-14 10:25:54+00:00): Hi, du hast hier einen landuse=residential auf farmyard geändert und einen Namen vergeben (Godejohann, Am Sennberg). Das kann ich so aus dem Luftbild nicht nachvollziehen. Sieht für mich nach Wohnhäusern aus. Das typische Inventar von Bauernhöfen ist dort nicht zu sehen. Ich nehme an, dass dort früher mal ein Hof war und dann nach und nach das Gelände mit Wohngebäuden bebaut wurde. Der Name des Hofes rottet dann vermutlich noch ewig in den offiziellen Karten vor sich hin.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117029939
Alex3271 (2022-02-08 13:22:44+00:00): Guten Tag,
die Straßenführung in Blieskastel wurde geändert und wurde in OSM bereits korrekt reflektiert. Durch Ihren Änderungssatz vom 05.02.2022 haben Sie jedoch den alten, nicht mehr gültigen Zustand wiederhergestellt. Mit Ihrer Zustimmung kann ich einen Moderator zu kontaktieren, der Ihre Änderungen zurücksetzen kann, sodass die Situation wieder korrekt dargestellt wird. Vielen Dank.
Makkaroni_100 (2022-02-09 01:48:56+00:00): Stimme dem zu.

Ich bitte um Entschuldigung. Ich bin dort vor ein paar Monaten lang gefahren und es war noch nichts von Änderungen zu sehen. Nachdem eine Woche lang niemand auf meinen Hinweis eingegangen ist, dachte ich naiverweise es sei hier niemand aktiv.
glglgl (2022-02-16 08:10:40+00:00): Ich behaupte mal, auch vor ein paar Monaten waren schon Spuren dieser Baustelle zu sehen. Ich käme da dann nicht auf die Idee, mich auf monatealtes Wissen zu verlassen.

Ich habe den Changeset jetzt mal komplett revertiert.