piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2021-03-25 10:06:00+00:00): Hey KhaledN
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
In this changeset you've added a lot of ways tagged as `airportasset=lateral' which is an unknown tag.
What do these assets signify?

Greetings from Switzerland and happy mapping,
habi

PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101627406
4004 (2021-03-29 00:24:37+00:00): мы с вами обсуждали, что удаление номеров аптек, и заполнение имени юрлицом - не пойдет
4004 (2021-03-29 00:25:23+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101893372
kate_rocketdata (2021-03-29 06:45:23+00:00): добрый день. я дала Вам ответ почему так, физически аптеки не имеют номеров, называются просто "Аптека" и внутри каждой аптеки существует название как я и разместила на карте (с указанием юрлица)
также я указала, что все аптеки в скором времени станут Альфа-аптеками (что мы естественно, обновим здесь)
4004 (2021-03-29 23:58:34+00:00): Я видимо вас не понял. Аптеки изначально имели номера - эти номера исчезли? Предположу, что они до сих пор используются для идентификации этих аптек и различения. 
Номер не обязательно держать в названии (ref есть), но если он есть то удалять его не стоит, если только Альфа не придумала какую то свою систему идентификации аптек. 
Юрлица - в operator.
kate_rocketdata (2021-03-30 09:13:15+00:00): спасибо, передам и уточню
indukun (2021-03-24 08:49:04+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(#101628632). Looking forward to learn from you.

Regards,
indukun
indukun (2021-03-24 08:50:18+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(#101628632). Looking forward to learn from you.

Regards,
indukun
zstadler (2021-06-26 06:25:48+00:00): שלום רב,

בעריכה זו הוספתם את שביל מסומן "סובב רמת אלון".
מהעריכות שנעשו מאז אני מבין שהמסלול עובר ב"שביל הילדים" המסומן בשטח בצהוב ואח"כ ב"ואדי שנק" המסומן בשטח בירוק.
אני מבין מכאן שזהו לא שביל מסומן אלא מסלול טיול - אחד מתוך מסלולי טיול אפשריים בשבילים המסומנים שבאיזור.
אם זה המצב, הרי שלפי כללי המיפוי, אין מקום למפות למפות אותו.
אשמח להבין מה המצב.
בברכה
זאב
Minh Nguyen (2025-08-10 02:24:56+00:00): I reverted this in changeset 170225644. I-280 continues all the way to the interchange with U.S. 101. The overhead sign you’re referring to is telling drivers to get into the right lane if they want to continue on to I-680. I’ve added a destination:ref tag to indicate that.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-08-12 09:59:40+00:00): Hi Minh Nguyen!

My name is Yuliya, and I'm the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you very much for addressing this changeset and providing an explanation for the reversion.
Here, we considered the Interstate 680 (California) article in addition to the sign. According to Wikipedia, I-680 begins at Exit 1A (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_680_(California). While we understand there are various mapping approaches, we adhere to the principle that an interstate should commence from an exit.
We would appreciate it if you could share your experience and perspective on this matter. What sources do you rely on, and what criteria do you use to determine the beginning of an interstate?

Best regards,
Yuliya
mueschel (2021-03-25 10:17:28+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please don't add private information like names of home owners and numbers of occupants to OSM. OSM is purely a geographical database and should not contain sensitive private information.
Buraddo (2021-03-24 12:55:22+00:00): Hello Geadan, thank you for editing OSM.

I have looked over your changes, as far as I know, the correct tagging for a residential complex is creating an area around the plot of land and tagging it with landuse=residential; name=*.

Take a look at how I mapped the area. Keep on mapping!
Geandan (2021-03-27 11:54:54+00:00): Hi Buraddo,
Thank you for your feedback.
It was one of my first updates.
Reagrds,
dvdhoven (2021-03-25 07:47:44+00:00): Je kunt routes niet corrigeren met ID.
ID plaatst de nieuw toegevoegde leden achteraan en dat is meestal de foute plek.
Binnen de routes liggen de wegen op volgorde, bij een knooppuntroute is dat van laag knooppunt naar hoog knooppunt.
Het bewerken van routes kan alleen met JOSM
Ik heb 23-97 hersteld.
Als je fouten constateert in een route plaats dan een note, dan pak ik of één van mijn collega route mappers het wel op.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
jimmyhendrix (2021-03-25 17:21:47+00:00): Hi dvdhoven,
thanks for your comment and repairing the route.
vele groeten
jimmy
Øukasz (2021-03-25 13:29:50+00:00): Hello testooools,

I see you joined the OpenStreetMap a month ago - welcome, we're glad to have you here!
Based on your changeset comments, I see you have been using various online mapping services. Please have a look at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_can.27t_I_copy_data_from_Google_Maps.3F

OSM is public, open, and free, but can only remain so if we do not abuse data licenses which, as that would make us vulnerable to copyright claims. 

We take this issue seriously. As there are not that many changesets you have created, may I request that you go through them, and flag if they used ANY external mapping service that does not explicitly permit OSM tracing. I'm afraid that these changesets will need to be reverted.

I hope this is clear, but please read through OSM wiki in case you have more questions or let me know directly. I hope you will stay with us as a mapper for many years.

Thanks
Lukasz (for the Data Working Group)
testooools (2021-03-26 13:33:21+00:00): Well Kira map Has MIT License on their data and I had a subscribe so what's wrong with it, And I have asked them to use it on OpenStreetMap and they have 0 problems with it?
testooools (2021-03-26 13:34:03+00:00): And thank you so much for making things clear to me <3
Øukasz (2021-03-29 15:15:31+00:00): Hello, and thanks for the responses,

Can you please point me to the Kira map and its license you are using?

Separately, I understand from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100976205 that you have used Google as a source for some previous edits?

Thank you for clarifications,
Lukasz (for the Data Working Group)
testooools (2021-03-30 22:34:43+00:00): I did once used google actually and someone said it's not possible and everything I did will be removed or something.

Then I had to look for alternatives as good, I did get the Kira map API from someone I know personally and Kira is a known company in Amman specifically, (Kira) check google play, A South Korean company as far as I know, And of course <3 I hope I helped you or something.
testooools (2021-03-30 22:36:29+00:00): And for the license, you can contact them in this email as I did.
" kirakrapp@gmail.com "
They are free willing to help and they have no problems as long as everything is open source.
testooools (2021-03-30 22:50:16+00:00): For any further informations
Drop your contact info ill contact you as soon as possible!
Øukasz (2021-04-19 09:24:42+00:00): Hello again,

Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#XYZ_Organisation_has_data_for_free_download_under_licence_N._Can_I_use_it_in_OSM.3F

In short: to use Kira as a source for OSM, you must have a written permission from them. An email address is not sufficient grounds for accepting this data source. Can you please provide this permission?

Thank you,
Lukasz (for the Data Working Group)
testooools (2021-04-25 20:52:33+00:00): Can you please appreciate the fact that this is local knowledge? I only needed the right places to put the info but i already have all the knowledge and how it looks in real-time, I go there daily and all the time, and I go home all the time. <3. No offense, please. don't get me wrong but I got harassed too much for doing a good thing here so, please.
Øukasz (2021-04-29 11:21:48+00:00): Hello again testooools,

First, thank you for continuing to communicate about this. I appreciate the openness and transparency, these are very important to how OSM works.

Second, using local knowledge is fine - in fact, it is the best possible source of edits for OSM. No problem there at all.

Third, we all need to follow the basic rules which allow OSM to be as successful as it is - now and in the future. We cannot copy other maps without permission. If we do, we need to provide their copyright holder's written permission. It is simple and transparent for everyone. If someone is trying to make sure that other members of the community follow this rule, I do not believe it amounts to 'harassment'.

In conclusion: for now, I do not believe you did anything wrong by referencing Kira Map, especially because it appears to me that the edits really WERE mostly based on local knowledge, and only used the Kira map as a reference. So I am not making any edits or corrections on this. However, if you want to continue to use the Kira map as a source of data for OSM edits in the future, please obtain their permission and publish it BEFORE your next edits. It can be as simple as taking the email in which they agree to you using their data and copy pasting it into your OSM diary, and then referencing this diary post in your changesets. 

Separately, I believe there were some of your earlier changesets where Google was cited as a source. This is a separate issue, and I will comment on those changesets separately.

Please let me know if you have any more questions, and thank you for your contributions and understanding of our rules.

Lukasz, for Data Working Group
testooools (2021-04-29 16:42:05+00:00): Actually thank you so much for the informations I never knew there is a diary and it could be that easy, I will be more than glad to do that, And really sorry for any misunderstandings that happened here, Forgive my temper didn't mean to <3
testooools (2021-04-29 16:43:19+00:00): And for google maps, I was new to osm and i didn't even think of it that way as copyrights and things xd, I thought maps work as it works and didn't know about the world of copyrights and things sorry about that
aharvey (2021-03-25 06:30:53+00:00): A lot of these where you've add works landuse appear to be office buildings, and not works per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=works. Could you provide more detail about your changes please?
literan (2021-03-24 18:56:15+00:00): да, еще, если будете рекламно-СЕОшные окончания в адресе сайта приписывать, наткнетесь на бан.
frosm (2021-03-24 12:54:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pourriez-vous svp éviter de vandaliser la carte ?
cela serra annulé
Bonne continuation constructive
Vinber (2021-03-24 12:55:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez vous faire des commentaires compréhensibles svp ?

Bonne journée
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:10:18+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:10:31+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
user_5359 (2021-03-24 17:17:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8556503195. You have upload a whole area for amenity=parking. It isn't necessary to point an additional node inside of this area with amenity=parking and wheelchair=yes (or did you mean capacity:disabled=1??).

Also the tag traffic_sign=yes is useless without any information which traffic_sign is installed.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-27 11:33:29+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن شخصية للخريطة العامة
lenny32 (2022-10-22 09:00:17+00:00): Bonjour
En ce qui concerne le node 8556535145 : restriction=no_entry s'applique sur une relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:restriction) le oneway=yes est suffisant pour un sens unique. 
Si vous vouliez indiquer qu'en même le panneau : il ne faut pas dire traffic_sign=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:traffic_sign) mais traffic_sign=FR:B1 c'est-à-dire le nom du panneau (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_en_France#Panneaux_de_prescription_de_type_B)
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:10:42+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
PT-53 (2021-03-25 06:23:45+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
für diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5117163/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt.
Grüße
Geofreund1 (2021-03-25 09:00:50+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, aber warum schickst du mir das und behebst das nicht selbst?
kartler175 (2021-03-25 09:42:37+00:00): Weil Du u.a. folgende Knoten verschoben hast:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=35233448
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=297804421
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=552549707
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=298791026
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=35232719
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=35232404 ?
kartler175 (2021-03-25 09:47:19+00:00): Nur ein Teil von über 1000 veränderten Knote in diesem Änderungssatz
PT-53 (2021-03-25 10:46:17+00:00): Weil man aus Fehlern lernen kann, sofern man weiß, daß man einen Fehler gemacht hat.
Geofreund1 (2021-03-25 11:44:57+00:00): @PT-53:
Das sog. village_green habe ich - soweit ich das erkennen kann - nicht angefasst. Insofern kann ich keinen Fehler erkennen, den ich hier gemacht haben soll.
@kartler175:
Die Lagegenauigkeit der Gebäude  in Altdorf ist nicht besonders gut. Die Verschiebung der Knoten bzw. Gebäude erfolgte auf Grundlage von Maps4BW, was für mich die Referenz darstellt. In Altdorf kannst du gerne noch viel mehr korrigieren.
kartler175 (2021-03-25 13:16:11+00:00): Bei Geometriefehlern bevorzuge ich das Verursacherprinzip. Der Urheber von solchen Fehlern sollte sie auch möglichst selber beheben: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.99829&lat=48.63333&zoom=17&opacity=0.95
PT-53 (2021-03-25 14:23:13+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1, 
Du hast diese 3 Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/298791026/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/35232404/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/35232719/history
um jeweils rd. 6 m verschoben und damit die Selbstüberschneidung ausgelöst.
Achavi:
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=101634714
Grüße
Geofreund1 (2021-03-25 15:27:42+00:00): Die Überschneidung ist also nicht durch Bearbeitung des village_green hervorgerufen worden sondern durch Verschiebung eines Knotens des benachbarten Ackerlandes. Die Fehlerbehebung hat mich jetzt 5 s gekostet. Die ganze Schreiberei aber gefühlt mindestens eine Stunde. Was hätte man in dieser Zeit nicht alles mappen können.
PT-53 (2021-03-25 16:20:25+00:00): Hättest Du den JOSM-Validator (beim Hochladren) genutzt, hättest Du einen entspr. Hinweis bekommen und wir hätten alle Zeit gespart !
Geofreund1 (2021-03-25 16:41:47+00:00): Nu ist aber gut! Danke für den heißen Tipp, da wäre ich im Leben nicht drauf gekommen.
PT-53 (2021-03-25 16:44:03+00:00): Wirklich ?
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:10:53+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-24 22:15:57+00:00): Olá Ítala, eu acho que você está usando a tag errada para os elementos que voce adicionou, que são plantaçoes. Voce marcou como jardim ( landuse=garden) plantações. Que deveriam ser: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dplantation
Ítala Narusawa (2021-03-25 02:55:35+00:00): Boa noite Erick, muito obrigada pela explicação, foi de muita utilidade! Estou mapeando pela primeira vez e com certeza fico muito agradecida pela correção.
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:10:59+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:11:09+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
Vinber (2021-03-29 07:11:19+00:00): Vandalisme signalé auprès du lycée
eggie (2021-03-24 10:37:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
aharvey (2021-03-25 05:43:20+00:00): hi was this via a survey? A few questions,
1. Why is the SBS office marked as works "an industrial production plant"? Is this not an office anymore?
2. Why were the buildings on Parks Road deleted? Are there no longer there? They are visible on the most recent ESRI imagery.
3. Is landuse=works correct for the St Leonards Corporate  Center area, Fox Sports office building and AusPost facility, I thought these are mostly commercial office buildings, not industrial production plants.
4. With the St Leonards clinict, you've moved the amenity=hospital tag from the building to the grounds, but there are a bunch of other tags related to the hospital, these need to be moved across as they relate to the amenity=hospital.
Lonesome Valley (2021-03-25 07:11:58+00:00): Hi A. Harvey,

thanks for reviewing my work.

To 1.) and 3.) "I thought these are mostly commercial office _buildings_, not industrial production plants. "

I was struggling to find a tag. Is there any _area_ tag for offices, or postal facilities?

The wording for man_made=works to be "industrial" is an iD invention, the tag is much older.
4.) fixed
2.) I thought the building outlines were poorly representing ground truth.

→ Better with https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101694915 ?

PS: Do you know the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921646704 ?

Best wishes,
Lonesome Valley
aharvey (2021-03-25 07:43:36+00:00): 1/3. Yes the area tag for offices is landuse=commercial. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=commercial

The postal facility, I'd still tag this as landuse=commercial I think it' mostly fits better based on the wiki descriptions for commercial and industrial.

2. I added those building footprints as rough outlines. You're welcome to improve the geometry if you like, but even as a rough outline I think it's still helpful to show where the building is vs not having it at all. I also added the outline so that StreetComplete would prompt for the building quests, and having a way is helpful when on the ground surveying to know which building the quests relate to.

> → Better with https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101694915 ?
Where possible it's better practice to update existing objects instead of deleting then adding, but I know this isn't always practical.

The DCS imagery has the best alignment here, so I'll adjust to that. I still noticed another set of townhouses was deleted in your later changeset.

> PS: Do you know the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921646704 ?
Looks like a generic office building with no obvious name from the outside.
eggie (2021-03-24 10:48:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Wat was je bedoeling hier. Je actie onder commentaar h  heeft schade veroorzaak aan de kaart. Je edits zullen worden teruggedraaid.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-24 10:51:38+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101636205

warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	1
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway
eggie (2021-03-24 10:52:39+00:00): reverted by changeset  #101639076
eggie (2021-03-24 11:00:00+00:00): Please be careful with the map... All your edits are really in the map. 
Your added a road in the middle of the river? 
greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-03-24 11:21:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM.. You are sure???
addr:city	Mumbai
addr:street	Chincholi Bunder Road
landuse	residential
name	Goregaon West
residential	apartments

Greetz,
eggie
ravali_78 (2021-03-30 11:15:48+00:00): Hi mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with highways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101979930 .Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101636356
eggie (2021-03-24 10:39:38+00:00): Beste Koen...
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Je plakt de weg aan de landuse. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar voor anderen.
Liever niet doen dus.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101636691

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-24 10:44:48+00:00): Landuse weer losgemaakt van weg
eggie (2021-03-24 11:24:30+00:00): Hi Soviet lord   The school is already on the map.
Why twice?
Removed your contribution. 

Gr eggie
sjakobi (2022-09-25 20:28:00+00:00): Hi! Gibt's eine Quelle dazu, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451978833 "Verschlossenes Holz" heißt? Merkwürdigerweise habe ich nämlich bei Schkeuditz auch ein Schild "Revierort Verschlossenes Holz" entdeckt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10052182828
kartler175 (2022-09-26 12:09:59+00:00): Ich habe den Namen lediglich von der Vorgänger-Flächenrelation übernommen: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mcY
sjakobi (2022-09-26 12:30:12+00:00): Danke für die Antwort! Inzwischen habe ich den Namen auch im Mängelmelder (https://buergerbeteiligung.sachsen.de/portal/leipzig/beteiligung/themen/1024271) gefunden, scheint also wirklich doppelt zu sein.
eggie (2021-03-24 10:40:43+00:00): Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 
Iets bijgewerkt zegt helemaal niets
mvg
eggie
Gregory Peony (2025-11-10 04:19:18+00:00): It appears to me that you mapped the outline of a school as a school building. Please use ameity=school for this purpose and map the individual buildings within the area of the school. please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Single_school_on_one_site
kiaraSh-Q (2021-05-30 21:24:28+00:00): سلام. شما در این چنج ست وضعیت جاده نود و یک رو در ورودی شهر کهنوج و قبل از فلکه سلیمانی تغییر دادین که درست نیست، در اینجا سیل پلها رو تخریب کرده و یک مسیر موقت برای تردد ایجاد شده و پلها در حال بازسازی هستن و هنوز کار بازسازی تموم نشده. لطفا بدون شناخت محلی و علم و آگاهی از وضعیت حال حاضر اقدام با ایجاد تغییرات نکنین. ممنون
eggie (2021-03-24 11:25:49+00:00): Psease don't tag duplicate..and have a good look
The school is already on the map. 
greetz,
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2021-03-24 11:06:10+00:00): Hello. Why are you creating a separate point object for lighthouses which are mapped as polygons? One object in real life - one object in OSM, isn't it?
osmviborg (2021-03-24 12:08:23+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst enhver form for ændring af adressepunkterne. Adresserne bliver vedligeholdt af en automatisk proces. Hvis du mener at en adresse er placeret forkert, skal du rette henvendelse til kommunen.
ToniE (2021-03-24 11:18:53+00:00): Hallo ALG,

Bitte diese Haltestelle nochmals überprüfen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8556755927

Derzeit liegt sie innerhalb des von einem Zaun umgebenen Rosenparks und ist von der Straße her nur durch das Tor (nördlich von hier) erreichbar.

Ein paar kleinere Korrekturen habe ich schon vorgenommen.

Viele Grüße
Toni
Minh Nguyen (2021-05-21 21:00:16+00:00): Hi, these stubs are already built, not just proposed. It’s important to map these stubs as one-ways; otherwise, when a driver hears a voice instruction for this roundabout, the exit count will be off by one. This situation occurs frequently in areas that are being built in phases, so I’d suggest sharing this information with your colleagues. In the meantime, I reverted these changes in changeset 105110930. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
siddhaam (2021-05-24 08:33:33+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.Apologies for the wrong edit.I'll ensure to map such segments as one-way going forward.
Looking forward to learn more from you

Regards,
siddhaam
HaPe-CZ (2021-03-31 10:01:00+00:00): Proč zde máme nedoložené silnice, které nejsou značeny vodorovným ani svislým značením?
ToniE (2021-03-24 11:19:47+00:00): Waat -> Haar