piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2020-10-06 02:04:07+00:00): Tip: The abandoned old railway should normally be left. It is there to indicate that this bike path was built on old railway right of way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92001517
markkerrigan (2020-10-10 17:34:04+00:00): OK would have adding the tag railway razed been the correct way to go about it?
Glassman (2020-10-10 19:44:52+00:00): Yes the razed tag doesn't conflict with the new usage. I believed the Burke Gillman trail is tagged like that, although I haven't looked at it in a while.
eggie (2020-10-05 19:20:22+00:00): Tip.. building=school is oke. 
Een school heeft wel  een extra tag nodig: amenity=school 
name=.......
Dat maakt de school vindbaar in routingapps als iemand kijkt onder scholen.
Je kunt de amenity op de adresnode, het gebouw of het terrein zetten (vlak intekenen amenity=school)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Zie bv hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.26211/5.22339
Gr eggie
Ltrlg (2020-10-05 18:14:04+00:00): Oups, l'autre est https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374884, je me suis emmêlé dans les numéros.
seattlefyi (2020-10-06 01:34:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edits! One comment: Since the business location may have closed but the address usually remains for the next tenant, I put the address back (we'd like to not lose those!) and removed just the tags related to the closed business. Thanks again!
markkerrigan (2020-10-10 17:30:19+00:00): OK I'll keep that mind thanks for correcting me
literan (2020-10-06 21:32:10+00:00): вообще, парковки вдоль дорог/проездов принято мапить не точками, а через теги parking:lane на линии дороги
TimurRin (2020-10-06 21:34:21+00:00): Вдоль не ставлю (разве что случайно), за тег спасибо!
Basstoelpel (2020-10-07 15:55:43+00:00): Hallo ddfAtTheNet,

ein herzliches Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Gib doch bei allen Adressen auch die Straße mit addr:street an. Die Hausnummer alleine reicht nicht aus. Die übrigen tags addr:postcode, addr:city und addr:county sind zwar gern gesehen aber nicht unbedingt nötig. Reihenhäuser-Gruppen sollten in Einzelhäuser aufgelöst werden.

Eine entsprechende Auswertung gibt es bei:
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#15/52.4222/9.5972/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-wronghousenumber-outsideplz

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Basstoelpel (2020-10-07 16:05:25+00:00): Nachtrag: wenn die Hausnummern schon als nodes eingetragen sind, sollten sie nicht noch ein weiteres mal an der Gebäudefläche angegeben werden. Ein Objekt in natura - ein Objekt in OSM.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
SGorskiy (2020-10-15 13:03:44+00:00): Уважаемый. Мы используем name=* чтобы обозначать имя собственное. Мы обозначаем на карте наименования дорог, кафе, железнодорожных станций, парков, зданий и всего другого, что имеет собственное название.
Если данная территория относится к военному 

Для обозначения военных объектов используется тег military
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:military

Соблюдайте пожалуйста принятые правила сообщества OSM.
mueschel (2020-10-08 15:42:02+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags on these nodes. Many of them are misspelled and not used in any other place.

If this is some kind of group activity, please point your supervisor to the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Thanks!
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:34:18+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92003075
iWowik (2020-10-06 12:29:02+00:00): День добрый!
1. Соблюдайте пожалуйста соглашение о наименовании https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E#.D0.9C.D0.BE.D0.B2.D1.8B
Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
2. Названия на различных языках у вас не совпадают, какое верное?
Monotheist (2020-10-06 12:46:20+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо, что обратили внимание.
Исправил на русс. Луговой переулок
Weide (2020-10-07 04:09:49+00:00): Da ist kein öffentlicher Fahrradparkplatz. Da stellen nur die Hausbewohner ihre Fahrräder ab.
habi (2020-10-13 10:21:30+00:00): Hallo Marius
Du hast das ganze Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690402784) als 'Byte' markiert.
Ist das so, oder hat Byte 'einfach' ein Büro da drin?
Dann wäre es besser, dies als einzelnen Punkt zu markieren.
Gruss, Habi
Marius Schär (2020-10-13 17:43:38+00:00): Hi Habi
das Gebäude ist ein SBB Bürogebäude mit dem Namen 'Byte'. Quelle: https://www.lindner-group.com/en/references/detail/sbb-byte-wankdorf-32455/

Neben den Büros, ist auch das Luna Personalrestaurant im Gebäude.

Ist das die korrekte Form für OSM?
habi (2020-10-13 19:25:21+00:00): Oh, ich wusstet, dass die SBB ganze Gebäude benamst :)
Danke für die Info.
Dann ist das natürlich so korrekt!

Evtl. könnte mensch das Gebäude als 'SBB Byte Wankdorf' benamsen, wenn das offiziell so heisst.

E schöne Abe,
Habi
habi (2020-10-13 19:31:46+00:00): Tippfehler eingangs: "Oh, ich wusstet, dass" sollte heissen "Oh, ich wusste nicht, dass" :)
Frans S (2020-10-20 10:20:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please do not upload a single building each time. 
Upload when you have mapped several buildings or when you stop mapping
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92003367
timmito (2020-10-05 19:06:08+00:00): Natürlich in Kriftel, nicht Korbach.
opencarpatia (2020-12-04 14:47:17+00:00): Hello, with your recent edit you broke highway trunk geometry!! Please avoid massive updates without real description what is changed. In general, there is no any need to modify *trunk highway* geometry without good reason - it was already inspected multiple times.

Please fix the following ASAP:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7689336418/history#map=18/48.80470/23.08270
maraf24 (2020-12-07 17:42:06+00:00): Fixed.
opencarpatia (2020-12-07 19:17:27+00:00): maraf24, we appreciate your efforts of repairing these weird changes. They doesn't look like intentional vandalism, but in fact are very malicious.
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:24:07+00:00): @Jan Gaweł II xD

Following area is NOT fixed, please fix ASAP:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7686057117/history#map=18/48.63034/23.04795&layers=G
maraf24 (2020-12-08 20:02:31+00:00): I will fix any error you find made by Jan Gaweł II xD, as he is clearly not capable and not eager to do it.
opencarpatia (2020-12-09 01:04:08+00:00): maraf24, Are you going to review all and each of his changes? They are suspicious, not explained, not separated and not logical at all. It can take lot of time. Can you provide the ETA for that (I totally understand & respect you volunteered doing this) or you believe we need to involve Ukrainian community?
muchichka_s (2020-12-09 11:46:41+00:00): Many thanks, maraf24. I also corrected some mistakes after him. In all changesets that are corrected or reviewed, I put "+"
maraf24 (2020-12-09 15:58:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7686057117
I fixed this and several other geometry distortions I found.
I'm not gonna check all his edits, but many of them:)
muchichka_s (2020-12-09 16:22:34+00:00): Also I have already marked all bad or suspicious changesets by adding comments there. Of course I could have missed something. But I hope this simplifies the fixes
Mavpa_z_mapoiu (2020-10-06 16:25:49+00:00): https://kh.vgorode.ua/news/transport_y_ynfrastruktura/a1134655-utechka-haza-na-novykh-domakh-perekryli-ulitsu
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:07:32+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Ninjoh (2020-10-08 17:59:57+00:00): Leuk om al die mij zo bekende loopgraven eens goed overzichtelijk op een kaart te zien! Welke bron gebruik je voor deze loopgraven? AHN?
jordan_osm (2020-10-08 18:20:15+00:00): Hoi. Ja als je ze er zo intekent, dan zie je pas dat er echt heel veel loopgraven in dat bosgebied liggen. Ik gebruik de Duitse tegenhanger van AHN: nordrhein westfalia DTM hillshade. Zie verder PM
angys (2020-10-30 11:08:54+00:00): How you can access to the latest imagery?
angys (2020-10-30 11:09:59+00:00): And you forget to update roads at the upper side
StackofPaper (2020-10-30 23:11:24+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. To clarify, the date of the DigitalGlobe image was 2019-11-13, not 2020-11-13. That was a typo.
We mostly use the imagery that’s already available on iD and JOSM. We also have an agreement with Digital Globe to use some of their recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap. Where we use that, we always cite it with the date in the changeset source. If you’d like to learn more about the DG imagery, you can browse it here : https://discover.digitalglobe.com
angys (2020-10-31 04:17:40+00:00): Ohh, but that imagery is blurer than MAXAR imagery right?
Petchaburi (2020-10-05 19:56:29+00:00): Hi Kirbert,

should I add "source"="USGS Topographic" to all of your streams since you are obviously tracing from USGS?

Best wishes,
Petchaburi
Waffleboy (2020-10-05 19:44:48+00:00): Correction: the source used was Yandex Panorama
Cascafico (2020-10-06 08:12:04+00:00): Ciao map per,
hai per caso delle foto/link del "sentiero ad anello"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92005676
map per (2020-10-06 08:21:48+00:00): No, I don't have photos
Frans S (2020-10-18 13:09:05+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
mariotomo (2020-10-05 23:24:11+00:00): Hola Clemente Acosta.  sorry si te comento a varios conjuntos de cambios, es que en cada uno hiciste una o dos cosas, y se entiende la intención, pero hace falta la forma.  por ejemplo: un punto con tan solo la etiqueta `name` no tiene efecto en el mapa, y cualquier sistema de revisión de datos te va a informar que los sistemas automáticos no podrán entender tus intenciones.
por ejemplo el nodo: calle interna sabepark (7978614969), o el sendero "lindero".
la "Galera Sabepark", se trata de un área reservada a tiendas diferentes?
Clemente Acosta (2020-10-05 23:27:32+00:00): Se trata de un terreno con áreas en desarrollo, que aun no están terminadas.
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:53:53+00:00): source: bustimes.org
mariotomo (2020-10-05 23:10:11+00:00): hola.  un área, con nombre y descripción...  pero... qué es?
mariotomo (2020-10-05 23:15:00+00:00): la foto aérea no ayuda mucho.  yo veo... qué será?  seis torres?  de 3m × 3m de base?  no entiendo!
Clemente Acosta (2020-10-05 23:17:57+00:00): Es un hexagono hecho de contenedores, colocados en forma vertical.
Clemente Acosta (2020-10-05 23:19:00+00:00): Es un área donde se está construyendo un parque de aventuras.
ralley (2020-10-06 02:42:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  You should probably tag this as leisure=fitness_centre as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92006016
mariotomo (2020-10-05 23:04:56+00:00): hola Clemente Acosta, gracias por añadir detalles en el mapa.  cuidado con el utilizar el campo "name" para explicar qué es el objeto en cuestión.  si se trata de terrazas deportivas, no pongas en el mapa que se trata de un parque y que su nombre es "terrazas deportivas", sino escoge el tag más apropiado.  te sugiero revisar el Wiki, o preguntar en uno de los grupos de apoyo, por ejemplo en Telegram, o en un forum.
Clemente Acosta (2020-10-05 23:19:50+00:00): Gracias, lo revisaré y hago los cambios.
mariotomo (2020-10-05 23:00:16+00:00): Hola Clemente Acosta, gracias por contribuir al mapa.  los comentarios a los conjuntos de cambios ayudan a los demás maperos a revisar qué pasa en el mapa. aquí dices "calle privada", pero cuál sería ...  (cambiaste una linea de transporte de energía eléctrica, y una carretera segundaria).  es útil utilizar un verbo en el comentario, para que se entienda la acción central en la edición.
tastrax (2020-10-12 10:26:54+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:41:13+00:00): Please do not use crossing=marked, but crossing=uncontrolled. Also do not add crossing=marked and traffic_calming=bump to the way of the crossing, only to the node shared with the intersecting road.
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 21:54:36+00:00): I will use uncontrolled but as this is equivalent of marked it should not be a problem. In wiki for 'Key:crossing' they say 'For detailed mapping it may be useful to tag ways leading from a sidewalk to the crossing node with footway=crossing'... Do you have other recommendation wiki or you try to keep small size of OBF? I've seen many places where crosswalk is mapped as way and web editor offers 'marked crosswalk' for both way and point and it sets these tags and it shows icon of pedestrian on zebra.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 00:18:23+00:00): Yes, it is great to set footway=crossing on the footway from the sidewalk to the crossing node. But not more than that. Set all the crossing*=* tags on that crossing node shared with the way.
You can also set footway=sidewalk on the footways parallel and close to a road (but where it crosses the road make it footway=crossing).
Yes, the iD editor invented the crossing=marked tag (without any discussion and necessity) and offers to set it on various objects. But the rest of the OSM users and other editors are against this, so we just have data damaged by this iD editor. There are already talks about removing this editor from the osm.org website as its authors have many own decisions like this.
jurajik82 (2020-10-26 22:58:16+00:00): OK. I see minimizing principle.
If iD is removed I'm not sure whether I install JOSM. We'll see.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 10:48:37+00:00): If you are able to read OsmAnd sources, you should be more than capable to use JOSM :) It works in Java so basically also does not need an install. It has much better tools and data checks (but does not do questionable "upgrades" automatically). I always recommend it. Thanks.
Glassman (2020-10-06 05:31:11+00:00): I asked for suggestions on how to tag Tailspin Tommy's. The suggestion was to tag it as a fixed-base operator. Doesn’t look like there’s an established tag for an FBO yet, just amenity=fixed_base_operator w/ a handful of uses, but there should be a good answer given how common and important they are in general aviation. In the meantime, they could also map the individual services, like flight instruction as https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=flight_school and fuel as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dfuel. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92006996
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-20 17:34:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855624816/history

have you meant surface=gravel?
Paul Todd (2023-07-22 11:04:37+00:00): Yes - thanks for fixing typo
user_6110846 (2020-10-06 07:59:00+00:00): ви прорушуэте домовленысть про name en 
ви викоритсовуєте неправильний стандарт транслітераціі   Polovoho оце правильно
user_5359 (2020-10-06 03:42:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice we use lowercase characters for key and value (building=yes instead BUILDING=YES). Also this tag is for the way not for the nodes on the way. 
I have correct this type of error.
dx125 (2020-10-08 11:09:05+00:00): ich habe hier versehentlich auf "review request" geklickt ;-)
Lachgast (2020-10-06 20:38:08+00:00): Helemaal top gedaan!
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-07 12:13:43+00:00): Dankjewel voor de feedback. Dan ga ik vrolijk op deze voet verder :)
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:35:04+00:00): This change is unneded. The lanes were correct. Yes, the shape of the turn from Kosicka to Mlynske Nivy wasn't exact, but you added unneded complication, forgot to forbid some turns so the routing will be wrong here.
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 22:31:47+00:00): I thought this crossroad should be mapped similar to crossroad at Hoddzovo namestie and after few changeset I had all turn restrictions. I respect your decision. There was anyway 1 problem that I would not solve when road to AS/center gets open.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 00:24:54+00:00): It was inconsistent, you could then also make another shortcut way from Prievozska to Kosicka.
Hodzovo namestie is a more complicated junction. But, you make a separate road when the lanes are separated by a physical barrier or at least the white bars, or a double white line (see e.g. Namestie 1. maja). That is not the case here. Yes, there is also the junction of Bajkalska/Prievozska that has many roads mapped separately, but it would be hard to model that one with a simple square as we have here on Kosicka.
jurajik82 (2020-10-27 00:22:49+00:00): OK.
Frans S (2020-10-06 13:23:18+00:00): Hello,
Why don't you take the time to map properly and square the buildings you map?
I remove these mappings so that another mapper can map these properly.
Regards
alester (2020-10-08 15:55:03+00:00): I've removed the opening_hours from this gate. The hours on Mosaic gates vary depending on the time of year, and there are also stretches of the year where it will be closed 24/7. The note that led to this changeset was likely an improper use of notes and was intended for sharing with someone else, not as a source for editing OSM data.
Rps333 (2020-10-08 21:32:22+00:00): thanks
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-10-06 15:32:59+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM ☺
J’admets ne pas bien comprendre le commentaire du groupe de modification. Qu’est ce que « lct » ?
7Low (2020-10-06 15:57:52+00:00): Bonjour, 

Premièrement j'aimerai dire que je ne suis pas nouveau c'est un bug d'OSM :-) 

"Lct" signifie "La Ciotat", c'est vrai que ce n'est pas évident, surtout lorsque l'on habite pas là bas, mais c'est l'habitude :D

Bonne soirée à vous, 
Cordialement, Rémi.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-10-06 16:11:26+00:00): Désolé, j’avais rapidement vu 30 modifications donc je me suis dit que vous étiez nouveau contributeur :-\
Merci pour la clarification ☺
lorec10 (2020-10-09 09:48:44+00:00): the relation is not historical, it is geographical. It doesn’t follow historic boundaries but only geographical ones.
MitjaJez (2020-10-10 06:30:20+00:00): Wiki shows that it expanded during time. This clears that it is historical. It may exist also today but it shrinked - need to correct todays borders of this region.
lorec10 (2020-10-10 07:26:44+00:00): The historical evolution concerns the political concept of Italy, the definition of Italian geographical region stays the same over time. The former concept changed over time, the latter stayed the same, since it is based over geographic elements and not political ones.
MitjaJez (2020-10-10 19:56:17+00:00): That's what i'm looking for here, what are "geographic elements" here?
What is on the other side of border of the Italian geographical region?
lorec10 (2020-10-10 21:00:56+00:00): The geographical region of Italy is defined to the north by the alpine arch and to the south by the sea, It also includes the European islands close to Italian coast.
KPull (2020-10-12 18:24:15+00:00): Are there any other examples of "Geographic regions" being mapped within OpenStreetMap?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92008630
lorec10 (2020-10-12 18:42:15+00:00): yes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917#map=9/41.9227/1.8155
Leo Slager (2020-10-05 23:18:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-10-05 23:29:19+00:00): Hallo,
Je hebt een busstation op de kaart gezet daar waar een treinstation is.
Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Een rest_area is een parkeerplaats langs de snelweg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
Je bijdrage wordt verwijderd.
Leo Slager (2020-10-05 23:30:34+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 92010161
Leo Slager (2020-10-05 23:31:25+00:00): Een rest_area is een parkeerplaats langs de snelweg. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area 
Je bijdrage wordt verwijderd.
Leo Slager (2020-10-05 23:33:07+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 92010238
Keksov (2020-10-06 07:47:34+00:00): Привет! Это всё-таки не тропа, а трек для колёсных ТС.
Keksov (2020-10-06 07:48:25+00:00): Там брод. Я лично видел как народ там на квадриках там проезжает.
Roolet (2020-10-09 22:08:08+00:00): Привет Keksov!

Я посмотрел ваши снимки в Mapillary и уровень воды тут довольно высокий. Если тут могут проехать квадроциклы, я не вижу как здесь может проехать машина. Я вернул классификацию этой дороги на track и добавил тэг motorcar=no.

Спасибо, Roolet
Keksov (2020-10-12 08:54:31+00:00): На самом деле, зимой тут уровень воды существенно ниже - чуть выше колена. Но, пожалуй, я соглашусь с вашими изменениями. Кто знает, тот и так проедет, а других водителей не будем подвергать риску... ))
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:33:40+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92009327
Bienson (2021-06-06 23:33:52+00:00): Hallo, nach diesem Edit gibt es an der Haltestelle Brünninghausen Betriebshof zwei Haltestellen, wo sich nur eine befindet. Vielleicht gibt es ja verschiedene Haltepunkte, aber die zusätzliche Haltestelle ist auch in keine Busrouten-Relation inkludiert worden. De facto gibt es vor Ort nur eine Haltestelle.
Soll das Tagging so sein? Sieht für mich etwas merkwürdig aus.

Siehe:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2702004
axelr (2021-06-07 11:21:23+00:00): Lt. EFA hat der Bus 449 eine eigene Halteposition. Da vor Ort nur ein Haltestellenschild existiert, habe ich Haltepositionen zusammengefasst.
santamariense (2020-10-13 19:49:09+00:00): Oi Revolta Gardy,

Vi que você adicionou uma restrição de retorno duma via para ela mesma [1]. Mapear este tipo de restrição não se aplica ao Brasil e acaba deixando os dados mais complexos do que a necessidade, por isso não se deve mapear este tipo específico de restrição;
Dá uma olhada na conversa que o naoliv teve na época. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527
Parece que isso até faz sentido em alguns países, mas não no Brasil.

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11722784