piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2016-03-11 14:45:07+00:00): highway=pedestrian это пешеходные улицы с названием как арбат. Пешеходные дорожки, независимо от ширины это highway=footway
literan (2016-03-11 14:48:07+00:00): и еще - все дороги и ддорожки обязательно должны иметь общие точки, иначе навигаторы не смогут строить маршруты. Поправлю.
Pilot777 (2016-03-11 14:49:11+00:00): ок, спс
literan (2016-03-11 14:52:19+00:00): нет, не могу поправить, т.к. конфликты с вашей версией. Закончите - поправлю. Но лучше, если вы сами все исправите, т.к. сейчас неверно все делаете... если будут вопросы - обращайтесь, помогу
Pilot777 (2016-03-11 14:53:52+00:00): поправлю, спс за пощь
Pilot777 (2016-03-11 15:16:58+00:00): закончил, вроде поправил, но посмотрите на всякий случай
literan (2016-03-12 10:59:19+00:00): Не совсем доделали - дворовые проезды остались residential. Сейчас поправлю. Подскажите, а в этом микрорайоне (да и вообще в округе) наименования у улиц вообще есть? Может, хотя бы "Проектируемый проезд №..."?
literan (2016-03-12 11:08:03+00:00): Обратите еще внимание - много случаев когда дорожки пересекают здания. Такого быть не должно, за исключением если это проход/проезд под домом (вот здесь написано как его обозначать: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage )
Pilot777 (2016-03-12 11:56:09+00:00): нет, )) тут все- третий микрорайон с номерами домов
Pilot777 (2016-03-12 12:06:11+00:00): как тунель добавить?
literan (2016-03-12 12:27:50+00:00): вот так: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185266152/history 

На самом деле - если не знаете как что обозначить, просто смотрите в других местах (центр Москвы, Красногорск хорошо и качественно обрисованы). Я именно так учился - просто копировал
Christopher (2016-03-28 13:47:38+00:00): Beim Zeichnen darauf achten, dass neu gezeichnete Wege entsprechend verbunden sind oder alsBrücken bzw. Tunnel definiert sind und der richtige layer angegeben sind. Fuß weg am Ostverbinder war übereinander gezeichent.
mathieuS (2017-08-18 10:40:30+00:00): Pourquoi avez-vous supprimé le bâtiment ? Il n'est plus affecté au vivarium, mais il existe encore physiquement.
Roland Pallai (2016-03-24 15:04:45+00:00): Szia! Majdnem jó lett, csak az incline -19% kell hogy legyen, mivel az út fentről halad lefelé. :)
AgusQui (2016-03-11 16:38:57+00:00): Hola, a la cancha le tenés que poner la etiqueta leisure=pitch + sport=soccer
Al club alrededor de la cancha leisure=sports_centre
Y a la colectora de la cancha, supongo que es calle interna del club, highway=service
Saludos!
nammala (2016-04-26 07:24:41+00:00): Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best, 
krishna
Commodoortje (2016-03-12 22:29:17+00:00): Gerrit, 
Zou je wat meer kunnen vertellen van je bron? Je geeft op je changeset aan dat de bron: "Inwingegevens Landmeter" zijn.

In de BAG is deze data (nog) niet bekend. Zou je wat uitleg kunnen geven?
Dit om mogelijke problemen van de rechten die zouden kunnen rusten op deze data. 
Het is namelijk zeer interessant dat deze bron over nieuwere data beschikt dan wat in de BAG staat.

Alvast dank.
Trójgarb (2016-06-12 18:45:35+00:00): Naniesiona zmiana rozwaliła przebieg dobrze zmapowanej i popularnej ścieżki rowerowej. Proszę o wycofanie zmiany i przywrócenie pierwotnego stanu.
user_717069 (2016-06-20 14:18:26+00:00): Poproszę o więcej szczegółów, która ścieżka została "rozwalona"?
Trójgarb (2016-06-21 09:08:44+00:00): Cześć,
cyklościeżka "Szlakiem milickiej wąskotorówki". Ponadto tym była połączona z trasą nieistniejącej wąskotorówki, tak że wyglądało, że prowadzi aż do Sulmierzyc, tymczasem koniec ma przy stawie w Grabownicy. Naprawiłem i znacząco uszczegółowiłem jej przebieg. Nie wiem, dlaczego wcześniejsza wersja cyklościeżka została usunięta, skoro była zrobiona bardzo dokładnie.
Pozdrawiam.
Владимир К (2016-04-07 09:35:25+00:00): Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74431%2C52.39393%3B55.74420%2C52.39180#map=19/55.74424/52.39287
these routes are wrong. So, it would be great, if you add relations for right routing and finish your #to-fix job. Or I will revert such chengesets, because it makes much more routine job, than improvements
samely (2016-04-07 15:07:35+00:00): Hey there! I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I don't know this place, but if you do, it would be great that you add those relations. I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38383360) Thanks for your feedback!
andygol (2016-04-08 11:31:08+00:00): Добрый день, Владимир К

Для того чтобы правильно прокладывался маршрут необходимо устанавливать, с помощью отношений, запреты поворотов - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38403486
Владимир К (2016-04-11 07:43:51+00:00): Спасибо, я знаю.
Владимир К (2016-04-11 07:45:42+00:00): А не слишком ли много там запретов? ну то есть разве не достаточно просто только прямо?
andygol (2016-04-11 10:15:12+00:00): Можно, конечно, поэкспериментировать с запретами, чтобы точно понять какие из них нужны
andygol (2016-04-11 10:16:32+00:00): Если опираться на знаки (я смотрел на Яндекс Панорамах) то для каждого направления нужно по два релейшена "только прямо"
Владимир К (2016-04-11 10:38:15+00:00): как тут?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37761536#map=19/55.73407/52.42464
andygol (2016-04-11 11:32:22+00:00): Да. Только нужно подождать пока данные попадут в OSRM или Mapzen, чтобы проверить это утверждение.

Вполне возможно, что можно ограничиться и одним релейшеном вместо двух - как в этом случае - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6118876, используя линию с ролью 'via' вместо точки
andygol (2016-04-11 11:39:50+00:00): Пока что только мои предположения, если использовать средний сегмент линии с ролью 'via', то при построении маршрута от него (от этого сегмента) необходимо задавать дополнительные ограничения, которые запрещают поворот налево и разворот, как я это сделал ранее. 

Одним словом, все эти предположения нужно проверить на практике. Я не стал этого далать сразу, что бы избежать обоснованных претензий со стороны участников, которые работают над этим участком карты. Я с радостью готов услышать о результатах ваших экспериметов с указанием различных типов ограничений для постороения правильного маршрута. Если нужна моя помошь - я всегда готов принять участие в улучшении карты
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-11 19:20:53+00:00): After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-14 09:15:45+00:00): No duplicates after all... Looks like after the connection drop on upload, duplicate objects were created locally but not on the server... What a big relief ! I'm still going to be on my toes next time...
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Владимир К (2018-09-14 11:44:14+00:00): нужно соединять пешеходные и троезжие дроги в местах переходов
DD1GJ (2016-03-11 19:56:41+00:00): Google Maps ist eine unzulässige Quelle für OSM. Daher werden diese Änderungen zurückgesetzt.

Das ist vermutlich kein Osterei, aber : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Copyright_Easter_Eggs
user_5359 (2016-03-13 13:58:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
maraf24 (2016-03-11 22:46:56+00:00): A co się stało z tym budynkiem?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192417695/history
rza31 (2016-04-27 13:17:16+00:00): Hallo,
bei Leerungszeiten von Briefkästen korrekte Syntax beachten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:collection_times
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:32:42+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Hjart (2016-03-11 18:21:34+00:00): I've changed this one back to tertiary
rab (2016-03-14 20:11:42+00:00): a straight line is defined by two nodes
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-11 19:20:49+00:00): After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-14 09:15:40+00:00): No duplicates after all... Looks like after the connection drop on upload, duplicate objects were created locally but not on the server... What a big relief ! I'm still going to be on my toes next time...
JeopardyTempest (2016-03-29 21:47:52+00:00): Hi samely... I'm newish at OSM, and seems you've got a lot more history than I, but I'm really confused by these changes.  You gave a US Interstate a Japanese name and speed limit, and added a strange 1 tag.  I'd look about reverting, but you seem to know what you're doing enough to fix\understand!  Please do fix!
manings (2016-03-30 04:58:15+00:00): @JeopardyTempest, thank you for flagging this edit.  I reverted the changes now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38157753
JeopardyTempest (2016-03-30 08:50:30+00:00): Thanks!
samely (2016-03-30 13:44:56+00:00): Thanks manings for reverting it! Thanks JeopardyTempest for your feedback, I'll be careful next time
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-02 09:51:27+00:00): Hi samely, you entered 8x tag "1"="yes", e.g. way/379682013. This seems to be a typo, as it has no meaning. Could you please fix it? Thanks, Alex
samely (2017-03-02 20:36:31+00:00): Hi Aleks,
It's definitely a typo, thanks for flagging this out, I've already fixed them.
Regards,
Eliane
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-11 19:20:41+00:00): After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-14 09:15:35+00:00): No duplicates after all... Looks like after the connection drop on upload, duplicate objects were created locally but not on the server... What a big relief ! I'm still going to be on my toes next time...
Polarbear (2016-03-13 00:53:52+00:00): Hi, this http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4055157069 should probably be amenity=community_centre. You can add a further description, see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre or for whom it is, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre#Target_groups
streckenkundler (2016-03-11 19:54:58+00:00): Ich bezweifle äußerst stark, daß dies ein offizieller Canpingplatz ist. Wenn ihr solche Aktionen macht, nutzt bitte andere Dienste, z.B. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/ um euren Standort zu verbreiten, nicht die OSM-Datenbank selbst...

Der Eintrag wird, wenn nicht von mir aber definitiv zeitnah revertet.

streckenkundler
DD1GJ (2016-03-11 19:44:44+00:00): Hallo Olsen93, willkommen bei OSM. Es ist überflüssig, eine normale Straße extra mit oneway=no zu taggen, da dies der Standardwert ist. Das kostet nur unnötig Zeit.
Olsen93 (2016-03-11 20:11:49+00:00): Hey, danke für den Hinweis und sorry für den Änderungsspam. ;-) Bin noch am ausprobieren, werde mich noch ein wenig in die Materie einlesen.
ToeBee (2016-09-07 07:22:08+00:00): FYI you seem to have removed the name=* tag from a couple of roads in Manhattan, KS in this changeset. Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222019530
mahaman ali douka (2016-04-09 17:48:56+00:00): du courage vraiment Moustapha c'est cool qu'Allah nous assiste amen
malenki (2016-03-15 16:35:55+00:00): Hallo OF-1, weshalb hast du diesen Ort gelöscht?: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2573418753/history
malenki (2016-03-16 21:45:58+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort.
Ich bin zwar nicht ortskundig, aber wenn Wikipedia meint, dass der Weiler ein Weiler ist, würde ich davon ausgehen, dass da was dran ist:  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietmanns_%28Bad_Wurzach%29
Im Zweifelsfall könnte man ja auch den Mapper fragen, der die Daten eingetragen hat.
malenki (2016-03-28 23:54:45+00:00): Danke fürs Neuerstellen eines Nodes mit dem Ortsname.

Ich habe den ursprünglichen Node wiederhergestellt.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-11 19:20:22+00:00): After repeatedly uploading due to network failure, I made a big mess of duplicated objects... I'll clean it up - but not tonight... Give me a few days of patience... Sorry !
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-14 09:15:30+00:00): No duplicates after all... Looks like after the connection drop on upload, duplicate objects were created locally but not on the server... What a big relief ! I'm still going to be on my toes next time...
Владимир К (2016-04-07 09:25:04+00:00): Hello! 
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on. 
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74431%2C52.39393%3B55.74420%2C52.39180#map=19/55.74424/52.39287
these routes are wrong. So, it would be great, if you add relations for right routing and finish your #to-fix job. Or I will revert such chengesets, because it makes much more routine job, than improvements
karitotp (2016-04-07 23:07:18+00:00): Hello!
I was fixing highway intersections that aren't connected, but I've already reverted my changeset on 38393541 .
Thank you for your feedback.
karitotp (2016-04-07 23:12:29+00:00): This is the link of my reverted changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38393541
edilqueirozdearaujo (2016-03-11 19:52:50+00:00): Corrigindo source: BING e IBGE
vovan__l (2016-03-23 09:31:13+00:00): Доброго часу доби. Дякую,що поповнюєте OSM карту.
З якою ціллю із зв'язку "кордон Журавне" було видалено саму лінію кордону.
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:23:56+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:23:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you mean leisure=park or leisure=playground?
maraf24 (2016-08-22 13:18:22+00:00): Czy te ulice, Prężycka i Błońska, istnieją w terenie?
user_5359 (2019-12-07 09:12:56+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag ATM=5B?
MHohmann (2016-03-11 21:48:38+00:00): Für den Fall, dass der Kommentar zum ersten Changeset nicht angekommen sein sollte: Ich bezweifle ebenfalls, dass sich dort ein offizieller Campingplatz befindet - als solches ist ein Mapping als camp_site falsch. Aktionen wie diese werden nicht in OpenStreetMap erfasst.
HubMiner (2017-07-02 18:36:25+00:00): Hello, is there a way to combine inner-boundary (with name) and outer-historic items?  I added extra info to the named item (boundary).
Dilys (2017-07-02 22:58:48+00:00): Hello, I am not sure I understand your question. Please feel free to change my edits or add whatever you consider appropriate. Dilys
HubMiner (2017-07-09 03:21:09+00:00): FYI, I decided against any big changes, since from search perspective it works fine.  Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse (2016-03-13 00:01:44+00:00): Oops - something went a bit wrong here.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403178513/history was in the middle of the Atlantic; I've deleted it.
Commodoortje (2016-03-12 07:04:34+00:00): Pitch in Pitch niet gebruikelijk
RijkPloeg (2016-03-12 07:51:11+00:00): Heb het omgezet in grasland.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
marc__marc (2024-09-18 00:27:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116051492/history
Que voulais-tu revérifier ?
tant qu'à améliorer le fixme, pourais-tu convertir le cycleway=opposite
M!dgard (2024-09-22 11:53:56+00:00): Dat herinner ik me niet meer volledig. De fietsinfrastructuur, eenrichtingssituatie, of misschien zelfs of deze weg wel nog bestaat.

Ik ben niet meer in de buurt, dus ik laat dit voor iemand anders.
tyr_asd (2017-02-02 11:17:00+00:00): Hi. You've added a couple of nodes on the North and South poles in this changeset, for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4055651345

I assume that this wasn't intentional, right? Do you habe any idea what could have caused this? Maybe it's a bug of the JOSM editor that should be reported to the devs.
naoliv (2016-03-12 00:55:03+00:00): Jonas, que tipo de esporte exatamente tem no local? Parapente, paraquedismo, asa-delta ou vários?
jonaspinheiro (2016-03-12 00:58:15+00:00): No momento somente Paraquedismo. Em breve estará operando um Cable Park também.
Oyten@OSM (2016-03-13 13:54:06+00:00): Hallo gemoe,
ist Hausnummer 20 eigentlich abgerissen worden? War schon einige Zeit nicht mehr in Fischerhude...

Viele Grüße aus Oyten
Oliver
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:14:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. A building id mark as  building=yes or building=commerical. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop, too.
rab (2016-03-12 12:40:08+00:00): Hello Susan,
I would like to give you some hints about interpreting Sat images and the area you are mapping.
before adding more data I would check what can be improoved on the existing Features. First most roads have an offset,  because the were drawn after previous imagery. Second There is still a highway tagged as "road". You should try to change that to a more reasonable tag. After that you search for the most interesting features in this area. With all the pitches  it is most probaly a school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403204896) Thats far more interresting than some privat pools.
Here are some things that I would like to see corrected:
You moved that node away from a tree shadow
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/292372748
You connected Kelvedon Avenue with Harlow Avenue. That is correct in principle. But this connection should be tagged as "path" or "footway" You can link also Gosfield Avenue with Maldon Avenue in a similary way.
I wouldnt consider this tracks on the schoolyard as very important, but when adding, I would assume that they are connected underneath the tree.
I hope this will help you with your further edits
rab
SReed (2016-03-16 20:24:37+00:00): If you would like to make these changes, please do so. It seems you have local knowledge. I will not be working on this Task again as I don't have the ground level knowledge you do for the Activation. I might suggest you contact the Activators to let them know of your interest in this area.
howdystranger (2016-03-12 03:43:44+00:00): This should have been recorded as being uploaded by howdystranger_LINZ sorry!
nammala (2016-04-26 07:23:17+00:00): Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best, 
krishna
nammala (2016-04-26 07:22:59+00:00): Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best, 
krishna
nammala (2016-04-26 07:22:32+00:00): Hi Gulrukh,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.

Happy Mapping.

best,
krishna
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:10:19+00:00): Welchem to OSM I have reverted your changeset. I Don't think you live on the street.
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2016-03-12 09:13:38+00:00): Ja, das ist der Haltepunkt "Abzweig Johannisberg" stadteinwärts ... ich schau mal die Tage wo genau der nach dem ganzen Informationspunkt-Umbau der jetzt liegt.

Andere Haltepunkt "Baunernhausmuseum" ist der tatsächliche stadteinwärts, stadtauswärts liegt er aber noch etwas weiter westlich in einer Haltebucht an der Wiese
Weide (2016-03-12 09:58:25+00:00): Danke!
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-12 19:04:12+00:00): a jaki miały?
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-12 19:50:09+00:00): znalazłem mase rysowanych w innych kierunkach,to wszystkie by były do poprawy
VA00 (2016-03-14 16:52:50+00:00): ,zęby'' mają pokazywać kierunek w przepaść, sam kilka narysowałem źle...
maraf24 (2016-03-12 10:40:06+00:00): Zmiana wycofana.
Colin Smale (2016-03-14 19:12:37+00:00): Sorry, I have reverted this... Neither the Tower of London nor Tower Bridge are within the administrative area of the City of London - they are just outside.
00crashtest (2016-03-15 01:10:35+00:00): Did you even open my link?! Also, the Tower Bridge has the City of London Coat of Arms on it.
Colin Smale (2016-03-15 07:32:39+00:00): Hi,
yes, I did view the link... However the fact remains that these two attractions are outside the administrative boundary of the City of London (they are within the London Borough of Tower Hamlets). Sometimes fact is stranger than fiction..
They are owned by the City Corporation, but so is a large cemetery in Newham and many other properties, but that doesn't change the fact that they are outside the City of London.
Hjart (2016-03-13 13:15:17+00:00): Please note that coastlines should never overlap
Jose Riha (2018-01-06 19:15:59+00:00): thank you for your changeset comment. correcting "e". note that this is in fact a czech letter (bozena nemcova was a czech writer).
GerdP (2016-03-14 09:08:21+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you use 
highway=residental instead of 
highway=residential. I've corrected this typo, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37815626
mueschel (2016-03-13 15:19:10+00:00): Hi FitriyaniRof,
there are some nodes with strange tags in this changeset:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eYL
Please have a look and delete unnecessary nodes and tags.
What is the meaning of tags like these: _gps_altitude=541
_gps_precision=9
_submission_time=2016-03-12T06:56:02
_submitted_by=None
_uuid=d9268e85-1d20-4f31-889d-8ad6886f3a32
_version=2.01603E+11

Cheers and enjoy OSM,
Jan
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:42:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
PT-53 (2016-03-12 13:51:08+00:00): Hallo kjon,
bitte gib doch künfitg im Kommentar an, was Du wo gemacht hast. Das wäre für andere Mapper hilfreich.
Danke
user_5359 (2016-03-12 19:01:32+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
jinalfoflia (2016-03-22 06:29:51+00:00): Have reverted this changeset as it used 'google' as a source and in context of this comment on the changeset - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37789545

Here is the reverted changeset - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37992378
Alecs01 (2016-03-15 21:53:29+00:00): Please don't mess with administrative boundaries, I've reverted this and the following changesets around the Pentagon
00crashtest (2016-03-16 10:58:40+00:00): The Pentagon's address is in Washington, DC. So, there should be an administrative boundary between VA and DC here.