piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GermanDeaf (2022-11-07 23:32:34+00:00): Hallo 👋🏻 Gehörlose 🦻🏻

("Wegpunkt" Ortsmrkierung hinzufügen. Garmin-Handheld Mauszeiger Ja 👍🏻)

Polygon hinzufügen. Garmin-Handheld Mauszeiger Irgendein 🤷🏻‍♂️?
______________

Hello 👋🏻 Deaf 🦻🏻
("Waypoint" Add placemark. Garmin handheld Mouse pointer Yes 👍🏻)
Add polygon. Garmin Handheld Cursor Any 🤷🏻‍♂️?
user_2066394 (2022-07-02 23:55:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863025081
Das Gebäude wurde abgerissen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319264045
Da fehlt noch ein Gebäude?
Eino81 (2022-07-03 08:58:10+00:00): Thanks for this update, I was there yesterday and indeed, this road is finished, not under construction anymore :)
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:35:38+00:00): Hi,

the relation 6102618 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
GBAB (2022-07-04 09:49:34+00:00): Hi,
yes, this is probably my mistake. It was a simple building (probably this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305715271) composed of two ways and tagged as a multipolygon. I converted it into one way and a simple polygon, however, probably didn't delete the relation itself. Sorry.

I don't know, how should I fix it because I can't find it on the map anymore…

Bye

Gábor
user_8101879 (2022-07-04 12:42:27+00:00): Ok, I will delete it.

Best regards
Fred
GBAB (2022-07-04 19:49:47+00:00): Great, thank you!
Gábor
MxxCon (2022-07-03 02:07:40+00:00): Hello again.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions a feature's name shouldn't be used as its description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123135877
tlconrd (2022-07-03 01:12:31+00:00): I went to the park and it also says sierra crest park on the bathroom.  the address of this park on the city's website shows as Sierra crest ii park. the webpage for sierra crest park claims there is a four shelters. But the park on condor only has two. I guess they consider it one park.
adrianojbr (2022-07-03 13:22:43+00:00): Olá, soledade!

Nomes, cidades, bairros iniciam com maiúsculas:
- addr:city=Soledade em vez de addr:city=soledade
- addr:suburb=Centro em vez de addr:suburb=centro
- name=Praça Central de Soledade em vez de Praça central de Soledade

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2022-07-03 13:43:39+00:00): Olá, soledade!

Aqui houve uma mistura do mapeamento do restaurante (área https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053778338) com o ponto para a rodoviária (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123137053).

Está correto o mapeamento de um ponto e uma área no mesmo local, pois nesse caso são dois objetos (então 2 elementos diferentes para representá-los).

Abraço!
marczoutendijk (2023-11-22 13:32:51+00:00): Hi,
leisure=pi?
That must be a mistake
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863113460
for leisure=pitch.
But still it is wrong then as a leisure=pitch cannot be tagged on a node but should be on a way.
Do you fix it?
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:34:03+00:00): Hi,

the relation 5711037 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
Jakob48 (2022-07-08 05:39:41+00:00): hello Fred73000,

i know about this empty relation and have documented it in my records. My plan is to use this relation later for other natural areas.

Greetings
Jakob48
Jakob48 (2022-07-08 05:51:48+00:00): btw.
The error message in JOSM is clear and unambiguous in German. There is no need for action by the development team.
user_8101879 (2022-07-10 19:14:34+00:00): Ok, thanks.
little_maper (2023-04-02 10:18:21+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
I noticed you added "construction=residential" and "highway=residential" in the same street, which is unsuitable.
In my opinion, in this case, it should be in the classification "highway=residential" in the operational area
 , and the construction area classification should be "highway=construction" and "construction=residential"
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075437118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075437179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075437174
Could you check it and fix it, please?
Regards
little_maper
LockOnGuy (2023-04-02 11:47:14+00:00): Hi, will update later today, the roads are open to drive on but I believe still not yet paved not sure. Will check later today and improve. Thanks
little_maper (2023-04-02 12:38:32+00:00): Thank you.
LockOnGuy (2023-04-03 04:56:26+00:00): Good morning! fixed in changeset 134436613, Thanks and have a nice day! :)
little_maper (2023-04-03 08:13:44+00:00): Good work on your edits! Thank you.
adrianojbr (2022-07-03 13:27:05+00:00): Olá, soledade!

Ao mapear pontos de interesse (POI), favor atentar para o caso de objeto já estar mapeado e evitar, assim, duplicidade, a fim de atender ao princípio de um recurso, um elemento (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element).

Assim, o hospital já estava mapeado como ponto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2126585297/history) e quando você criou a área para o mesmo hospital, restou no mapa 2 elementos (ponto e área) para o mesmo objeto no mundo real).

O recomendável nesse caso, até para não perder o histórico (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history), é aproveitar o ponto existente para formar a nova área a ser criada, e passar as etiquetas do antigo ponto para a nova área.

Abraço!
felipeeugenio (2022-07-08 00:18:51+00:00): HOla. Por favoe no usar el tag building=no. No existe. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123137525
adrianojbr (2022-07-03 13:40:38+00:00): Olá, soledade!

Aqui o mapeamento ficou bem incompleto:

1. O ponto https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863125040 foi definido como natural=wood, porém essa etiqueta somente deve ser usada em áreas ou relações. Para resolver, e se for o mapeamento de uma árvore individual, você pode alterar para natural=tree. Porém, se a ideia é mapear a cobertura por árvores, o melhor é criar a área (aproveitando o ponto existente e passando a etiqueta do ponto para a nova área);

2. A linha https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075441719 era para mapear um loteamento, o que pode ser feito através de uma área (linha fechada), usando a etiqueta principal landuse=residential.
2.1. Além disso, em name está "loteamento Ceccon, bairro ipiranga" incorretamente. Para corrigir, name deve ser "Loteamento Ceccon" e para o bairro deve ser usado addr:suburb=Ipiranga.

3. Não entendi o que você queria mapear com o ponto https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863125039 e com a linha https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075441720. Somente sei que estão errados, mas não tenho sugestões para corrigir.

Quando houver dúvidas, procure consultar a documentação (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) ou a comunidade (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels) -- a galera do Brasil é bem ativa no Telegram (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts#America).

Abraço!
Glassman (2022-07-03 17:05:55+00:00): #TIP: Other background imagery, right hand side in editor, can sometime have more recent imagery. In this case the ESRI imagery shows the roads. I aligned your road with the ESRI Imagery.

Also - street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time  unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123137581
TreeTracks (2022-09-21 06:40:07+00:00): Hi ConsEbt, great to meet you. Can you give some feedback on this surface edit please? The Lakes Way at Tarbuck Bay is clearly an asphalt road with lane markings on Mapillary street level imagery from 2015, and on Maxar and DCS NSW satellite imagery. Has it recently been downgraded to a gravel road? Thanks for your help, best wishes, Ian
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Mashin (2022-07-04 09:25:04+00:00): Here again you deleted lots of existing paths.
Also do you mind clarifying why is it important to add no-U-turn restrictions in parking lots and small driveways. Such restrictions are typically added only when there is a traffic sign prohibiting turning.
Mashin (2022-07-04 09:21:38+00:00): Here you as well deleted paths that exist. 
I assume you are trying to use auto-validation tools. Please don't rely on these tools 100% because they can be faulty. Always inspect the object with imagery or survey before removing the object.
iandees (2022-07-27 03:51:46+00:00): It looks like you're copying this data from Google. Please don't do that.
Frans S (2022-08-03 15:28:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please tag any building (except Tombs, they can be tagged as building-tomb) as building=yes. This is the standard tag for HOTOSM.
Best regards
SekeRob (2022-07-03 11:06:29+00:00): Madagascar roads and a node in Basserdorf. Accidentally?

There's 2 warnings too of a way crossing a building. Looks like you dragged a street node named Gerlisbergerstrasse. Kindly undo.

ciao
Loshu (2022-07-04 06:40:21+00:00): Thanks, node put back.
eggie (2022-08-16 08:56:40+00:00): Beste kraai.. Wat is de tracktype=grade?

dat bepaalt of de fietskaart met voorkeur  routeert.
Vanaf tracktype=grade2  (halfverhard) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype

Kijk je nog even.
gr eggie
oba510 (2022-07-03 08:31:59+00:00): Are you sure about this?  The city website ( https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/3334/Bay-Meadows-Community-Park ) specifically describes this park as having a "walking path" and mentions nothing about bikes, and these don't really look like bike paths at all.
Dodko (2022-07-03 09:33:48+00:00): Pri highway=track je dobré doplniť aj  kvalitu cesty
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype
Frans S (2022-08-23 12:52:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123141091
dieterdreist (2024-11-20 15:14:34+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai cambiato la fermata Stella Polare da railway=halt in railway=station, mi sembra che era giusto prima. 
Ciao,
Martin
AlCeRoma (2024-11-21 15:31:18+00:00): Il valore "halt" si usa per fermate ferroviarie molto piccole in cui i treni si fermano su richiesta, non mi sembra proprio il caso di Stella Polare...
dieterdreist (2024-11-22 10:24:22+00:00): no, la questione non è se si ferma su richiesta, ma se ci sono deviatori. Se ci passano solo binari senza che i treni possono cambiare binario è un "halt" e non una "station", in Italia i nomi sono "fermata" e "stazione".
AlCeRoma (2024-11-22 15:37:23+00:00): bene, in effetti sulla wiki inglese è stato inserito un grafico che permette di distinguere i due valori. Ho modificato così alcune stazioni della Roma-Lido perché avevo notato che erano improvvisamente sparite dalla mappa.
dieterdreist (2024-11-28 12:19:39+00:00): grazie per la spiegazione ma la fermata è ancora mappata come "station": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248413804
abakus_uploader (2022-07-03 22:31:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
lbaran (2022-07-04 06:22:53+00:00): Cześć!
Dziękuję za uwagi, poprawię się :)
Nearby0051 (2022-07-03 11:13:41+00:00): Hi,
I noticed you are adding new places to the map which is great. But please remember that the names and descriptions of places should be generic and usable by everyone. Please dont add bookmarks, such as "my school" etc to the map, especially then the place already has been mapped

thanks
pyrog (2023-07-16 16:45:31+00:00): Salut Nicolas,

Tu as créé un carrefour dans le réseau.
Merci :)

Mais il n'est pas à l'intersection des 3 chemins.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/433309800

Cordialement,
Yves
SebastianScarso (2022-07-03 08:10:28+00:00): La sala d'attesa è stata elimimata in quanto il locale utilizzato come sala di attesa è in realtà l'atrio di accesso agli alloggi del fabbricato viaggiatori.
Non ha sbocco sui marciapiedi della stazione ma solo sul piazzale esterno e non dispone di altoparlante per l'annuncio dei treni, proprio perché non è una vera sala d'attesa.
Tutto questo, che non la rende funzionale, aggiunto alla frequente presenza di persone senza fissa dimora, hanno portato alla chiusura della stessa.
E' stato effettuato uno studio di fattibilità per un altro locale posto dentro il fabbricato viaggiatori da dedicare a sala d'attesa (magazzino),  che dovrebbe essere realizzata a novembre di quest'anno.
EneaSuper (2022-07-03 11:19:55+00:00): Ciao, ho revisionato le tue modifiche:

- Bene che sia stata mappata la banchina, ma non so quanto possa essere utile inserirvi una linea con i tag di un percorso pedonale;
- I tag delle linee di cui sopra (in particolare "access=") andrebbero un attimo revisionati.

Se vuoi mi occupo io di fare tutto.
SebastianScarso (2022-07-04 18:07:15+00:00): Ciao Enea,
per me puoi fare ciò che vuoi!

Il percorso pedonale che ho inserito sul 1° e sul 3° marciapiede li ho messi perchè in certe mappe non vengono mostrati i marciapiedi di stazione (forse varia anche il tipo e l'utilità della mappa scelta), se pensi che questo sia superfluo cancellalo pure!

Per quanto riguarda il tag "access=",  il regolamento di RFI, nell'area di esercizio (marciapiedi di stazione) è vietato l'accesso, tranne al personale e ai viaggiatori, che devono essere muniti di biglietto (salvo stazioni dove c'è l'impossibilità a farlo come Ge Granara).

Comunque occupatene tu che è meglio.
Qualunque cosa sono qui
EneaSuper (2022-07-05 07:27:53+00:00): Grazie mille della tua comprensione, ho appena apportato delle modifiche:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123220628
Dodko (2022-07-03 09:55:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863412370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863412372
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863412366
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863412370

Neviem či je vhodné mať na jednom bode picnic_table a zároveň aj picnic_site lebo ktorá ikonka sa má v mape vykreslovať piknikový stôl, alebo piknikové miesto?
Djminisite (2022-07-17 13:07:57+00:00): I’m confused about these name changes, a lot of the name changes are changing from what is on the ground to names that only exist in NAPTAN, as far as I was aware the correct approach is map what is present on the ground?
confusedbuffalo (2022-07-17 13:52:37+00:00): Hmm, maybe I could have done official_name=
The issue is that often there are loads of bus stops called e.g. "Albion Road" on the ground so how are they to be distinguished? Also I think if the bus has a next stop readout or something then that will usually use the full name, for that exact reason.
Djminisite (2022-07-25 17:00:48+00:00): You do raise a good point, I walked for about 30 minutes yesterday, and every bus stop had the same name. I think, and I stand to be corrected, the best approach may be putting the NAPTAN name into official_name or alt_name, I think the wiki suggests alt_name would be more appropriate - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Tag_mappings

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name suggests
"The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself, especially for a feature in the built environment" - open to thoughts though :)
Harfeur (2022-07-10 11:22:30+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier votre changement, et celui-ci a l'air correct.
Merci beaucoup pour votre aide !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123143057
silversurfer83 (2022-07-04 20:54:21+00:00): Ich schon wieder :)

Wenn du Gebäude oder andere Dinge einzeichnest, die rechtwinklig sein sollen, dann kannst du den Weg (way) anklicken und mit der Taste "Q" alle Winkel sauber auf 90° stellen

Grüße
silversurfer83
englu (2022-07-04 12:19:05+00:00): Czy w miejscu 50.902563, 15.752930 nie ma już schodów, którymi można dojść do ścieżki pieszo-rowerowej? Zniknęło połączenie między schodami (810017936 ) a chodnikiem (470183647).
maraf24 (2022-07-04 14:15:42+00:00): Ta ulica wraz z chodnikami i ddr została nieźle spraprana w mapowaniu. Tam ddr i chodnik są rozdzielone - przypuszczalnie, bo z oznakowaniem jest tam krucho.
Nie skończyłem tego jeszcze, bo muszę się dokładnie zdjęciom przyjrzeć, by ustalić, gdzie co się znajduje.
Schody oczywiście są tam gdzie były.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-04 20:50:52+00:00): Moin Metz5555
Du scheinst noch recht neu zu sein, daher erstmal Hallo und Herzlich willkommen :)
Da ich dir in diesem Änderungssatz (auch Changeset genannt) schreibe, habe ich eine Anmerkung zu deiner Änderung. Schau Dir bitte mal die folgende Wikiseite zum Thema Hochbehälter an https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered
und dann vergleiche dies bitte mit deinem neu angelegten Hochbehälter. Vielleicht siehst du die von der Gemeinschaft vorgeschlagenen Werte und die von Dir gewählten und dass sie nicht ganz übereinstimmen.
Ist kein Problem und kannst du auch so lassen, nur erkennen dann die meisten Datenauswerter den Hochbehälter nicht richtig.

Grundsätzlich ist das Wiki immer ein guter Ort um sich schlau zu machen, auch wenn es gerne mal verwirrend ist. Alternativ kann ich dir die diversen Chatgruppen empfehlen, die eigentlich immer sehr hilfsbereit sind (siehe hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers)

Grüße und weiter frohes mappen
silversurfer83
◪ Jarv (2022-07-04 20:40:34+00:00): Hi Hinks. Although this road is not suitable for walking or riding/leading a horse - it is not illegal and is legally permitted. Therefor setting the foot and horse tags as "no" is not correct. I've remove these tags from the roads now. Routing software should avoid suggesting pedestrians & horse riders from using this road as it is tagged as a "primary" road, along with a 70mph speed limit and no sidewalk tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123143535
BCNorwich (2022-07-03 13:24:44+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags here, 18 Sadler Close is not the house name.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-07-03 13:32:09+00:00): Hi, the correct tags were on the POI, I've moved them to the building.

Regards Bernard.
haavee (2023-02-08 14:38:44+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.56104/8.36121
Hier ist eine Unterbrechung in den Gleisen, das stimmt doch nicht? Gleis 33 ist jetzt nicht erreichbar..
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 15:09:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3779344715/history has brand:wikidata = Q1462383 that was added in this edit
brand:wikidata=Q1462383 and brand:wikipedia=de:Mayersche Buchhandlung link brand entry that is supposedly not existing anymore

Is this place still existing? If yes, have they changed name/brand?

Or maybe Wikipedia/Wikidata is wrong and this place exists, under this brand and just owner is different?

Maybe just some brand tags are wrong and outdated and were not changed when POI was updated?

From https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4935917 it seems that potential fix may be using brand:wikidata=Q2408854 linking https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2408854 (and changing also brand:wikipedia if present)
svencb (2025-12-03 16:58:29+00:00): The place still exists according to the website and I assume they are using a combination of the logos of "Mayersche" and "Thalia" at the moment. (Probably migrating to "Thalia" in the long run, but that's speculation.)
As I am not around, I cannot check on location.
BCNorwich (2022-07-03 13:52:19+00:00): Several amendments.
highflyer74 (2022-07-04 07:55:02+00:00): Moin Thomas und willkommen bei OSM!

Stichwort verschoben: kann es sein, dass nur das Luftbild einen Versatz hatte? Da du noch neu bist: viele denken nicht daran, dass Luftbilder im Allgemeinen einem Versatz unterliegen.

Zum Recyclinghof: hier wurde (absichtlich oder nicht) eine Relation angelegt, welche gar nicht nötig ist. Dafür reicht ein "normaler" Umriss, wie er vorher schon vorhanden war.

Mach Dir keine Sorgen: ich fixe das wieder :-)

Wenn Du uns weiterhin bei OSM helfen möchtest, lies Dir bitte einmal folgende Links durch und schau auch gern mal auf unserem monatlichen Bremer OSM Treffen vorbei:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community

Viele Grüße!
BCNorwich (2022-07-03 14:18:48+00:00): Hi, Quite a few problems including duplicated sections of highway and several highways joined to area outlines. I think I've fixed them all.

Regards Bernard.
OrelEagle (2022-07-10 13:19:11+00:00): I realized this edit was wrong, however I can't find how to revert it.
user_2066394 (2022-07-14 20:21:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075499173
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075499172
Die Wege laufen aktuell ins Leere, wie sind die östlich angeschlossen?
user_2066394 (2022-07-14 20:23:12+00:00): westlich
MaestroGlanz (2022-07-15 07:37:39+00:00): Ich denke, Sie meinen westlich. Östlich sind sie ja angeschlossen. Soweit ich das sehen kann, enden die im Leeren. Was ich nicht erkennen kann und auch nicht in der Erinnerung habe, ist ob am Ende ein Zaun ist.Vermutlich ja.
user_2066394 (2022-07-16 20:59:12+00:00): Logo westlich, siehe Kommentar nach dem Kommentar.

Bei unserer letzten Interaktion haben wir uns noch geduzt :-)

Habe noch noexit=yes ergänzt.

Der Zaun wäre noch interessant ja.