piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2018-01-11 18:39:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Alejandra Garzón (2018-01-17 22:39:51+00:00): esto es un parque
zstadler (2018-01-11 17:11:35+00:00): Hi,
.
In this edit you added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552265547 and now Anava single has two parallel routes.
.
Can you clarify which is the right one, and correct the Anava relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1820960 too?
zstadler (2021-07-11 22:23:42+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55358454
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-11 18:08:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552268331
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
TheSwavu (2018-01-11 20:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.

These boundaries were imported from the NSW LPI dataset and are therefore what the owner of this reserve thinks are correct.

You will find many examples where the existing road does not fit within the original   road reserve. This just represents the facts on the ground.
TheSwavu (2018-01-11 20:18:30+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55341795
FreshwaterBeach (2018-01-11 21:51:40+00:00): No worries, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying!
Warin61 (2018-01-12 22:38:17+00:00): HI,
Welcome to OSM. 
You will find there are a variety of views here. The boundary you changed was from the NSW Land And Property Information department - they are supposed to keep the property boundaries. I think the ones you changed are legal easements .. possibly for roads or even electricity supply lines .. the actual placement on the land may differ some what from the legal ones drawn up some time ago. The ones in the Stuart NP look to be very wide and I think come from stock routes.. I think they are interesting things to have on the map and show detail that you cannot see on the ground itself. 
Some disagree with that and prefer to map what they think is NP from ground observations, but I find the LPI information is more accurate than what I can determine from ground observations. 
Keep mapping, mistakes and difference of opinion are part of being human.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Madeline Steele (2018-02-01 20:46:43+00:00): Hello there! Please don't add fictitious parks to enhance your pokemon go experience. Here are some good tips: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers. Reverting this changeset.
Adamant1 (2018-02-02 13:59:10+00:00): Hey there. Did you even bother to look at the sat photos? Because there is actually a park there. It's pretty tiny and probably only for the usage of the residential area, but it still counts. I added it back.
Madeline Steele (2018-02-02 22:09:35+00:00): Hi - I did look at the aerials yes, and this seemed more like apartment complex landscaping to me than a park. The fake name (Dawson Park) was a bigger issue -
 it's the name of a real park in the area and thus could thus lead to geocoder issues. I see your new version doesn't include a fake name, so I'm fine with letting it stand as is.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
JJIglesias (2018-01-11 06:35:29+00:00): Muy Bien
Gracias por editar en #OSM_BO
Si quieres buscanos en Facebook
Slds
JJ
wa 72213368
JJIglesias (2018-01-12 04:26:06+00:00): Saludos, por favor visita:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia:Map_Features
user_5359 (2018-01-12 20:42:11+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-11 17:59:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This area doesn't seem to be a park but more a pure grass area. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dgrass
AkuAnakTimur (2018-01-11 05:53:03+00:00): Hello & welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Tip for you: here's how to change the background into something more updated: https://gfycat.com/DemandingDeadFunnelweaverspider

On top of that, if something is definitely playground, then search for playground in the search box -- those are two different things altogether :)

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=playground

If you happened to play Pokemon Go, playgrounds (and other things) can spawn Pokemons too. But, please, _please_; tag things correctly.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/7hm27r/why_isnt_this_river_showing_up_and_wheres_my_nest/

Just to let you know that OpenStreetMap values accurate mapping. Hopefully tagging could be done closer to what things are in reality, while you're happy that Niantic somehow pull their act together in the near future.
user_6110846 (2018-02-28 05:50:42+00:00): I added a Ukrainian translation. Do not delete it please
user_5359 (2018-01-11 17:14:39+00:00): Hello, Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
user_3022894 (2018-01-12 21:05:41+00:00): Hallo liebe(r) User/-in 9orb,

erst mal vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! Dieser ist im Grund richtig, aber dann doch leider irgendwie verkehrt. Ich werde im Folgenden erläutern, weshalb: Die Linie, die du hier bearbeitet hast, hast du vor deiner Bearbeitung im Editor (dem Programm, mit dem du bearbeitest) als „Eisenbahn“ gesehen. Diese Linie soll(te) einen Teil der nicht mehr vorhandenen Schienen der alten Nordbahntrasse darstellen und jetzt dachtest du dir bestimmt „oh“, hier ist die Karte aber nicht aktuell, denn das ist ja hier schon seit längerem ein Radweg. Allerdings ist deine Bearbeitung so leider nicht sinnvoll. Zugegeben ist die Situation aber auch verwirrend. Die Nordbahntrasse als Fuß- und Radweg ist in dem Bereich schon längst kartiert, und zwar hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197929506 Und das ist auch der exakte Verlauf des heutigen Weges, der Verlauf entspricht nämlich überhaupt nicht demjenigen der Linie, die du bearbeitet hast. Unabhängig davon hast du jetzt quasi einen zweiten Radweg hinzugefügt, obwohl der richtige schon da war, verstehst du? Man muss sich manchmal sehr genau in der Umgebung seines Gebietes auf der Karte umgucken, bevor man anfängt, zu bearbeiten. Nun möchte ich dir noch erklären, was es eigentlich mit dieser „Eisenbahnstrecke“, die deine Linie vorher war, auf sich hat: Diese Linie soll(te) den Verlauf der – ja nicht mehr vorhandenen, aber historisch interessanten – Nordbahn-Eisenbahnschiene darstellen. Solche railway=razed-Linien stehen für abgebaute Gleise, deren Verlauf in OSM zumindest in bestimmten Fällen auch dann noch eingetragen wird, wenn die Gleise gar nicht mehr vorhanden sind. Grundsätzlich stören diese Daten nämlich niemanden, da railway=razed eindeutig aussagt, dass kein Gleis mehr daliegt. Für bestimmte Karten werden solche Gleisverläufe noch gebraucht, und das andere kartiert man halt darum herum. Um die Aktualität der Daten bezüglich des Radweges musst du dir hier also keine Sorgen machen :) Zugegeben wird dieses abgebaute Gleis im iD-Editor aber auch ziemlich blöd dargestellt, sodass man es dort leicht als Eisenbahnstrecke, die existiert, missverstehen kann. Mein Tipp: Achte immer auf die Tags bzw. Key-Value-Kombinationen (z. B. railway=razed) und sieh' im OSM-Wiki nach, was sie beudeuten bevor du bearbeitest. Bitte habe Verständnis, dass ich deinen Änderungssatz dann in den nächsten Tagen rückgängig machen würde (das wäre aus meiner Sicht die einfachste Lösung), du kannst das aber auch gerne selber zurück-ändern. Ich danke dir für deine Aufmerksamkeit und hoffe, dass du folgen konntest. Es gibt viel zu beachten, nicht wahr? Bei Fragen stehe ich dir gerne zur Verfügung. Du kannst mir auch eine persönliche Nachricht schreiben, wenn du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lukas458 auf „Nachricht schreiben“ gehst.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
nern9 (2018-01-11 05:52:00+00:00): Are you sure this area is a park? It seems like you are just selecting large areas. They don't even have names.
obubison1 (2018-01-11 06:02:45+00:00): This area is the site of the Pottawatomie County Museum and Santa Fe Depot Museum and Park. I put that name on it. Did I do this incorrectly.
nern9 (2018-01-11 06:09:32+00:00): My appologies, i misread the map and thought the orange square was the feature that you added, when in reality you only added a node. Sorry for my misunderstanding!
obubison1 (2018-01-11 06:11:32+00:00): No problem, I'm new to this and thought I made some huge mistake. I see the "node" that is the green park area. Why does it also have the large orange rectangle?
nern9 (2018-01-11 06:14:16+00:00): From what I have noticed, the rectangle fits all of the edits that you made on the map. I made an area for a park and that fit inside of the orange square. Maybe that is what threw me off, because it made such a large square and you only added a single node.
obubison1 (2018-01-11 06:16:21+00:00): Please know that I appreciate the comments. I'm new to this and want to do it right. Thank you.
nern9 (2018-01-11 06:18:15+00:00): Im glad I can help. Im also pretty new to this, so we both are learning!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:01:10+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55342568
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_3022894 (2018-01-12 21:19:21+00:00): Hallo 9orb,
ich bin's nochmal. Bitte ändere nicht "einfach so" highway-Klassifizierungen oder Zugangstags von "yes" auf "designated" oder Vergleichbares. Diese Tags umd auch die Klassifizierungen richten sich in der Regel bei solchen Wegen nach der Beschilderung. Diese sollte man genau kennen, um die richtigen Tags zu vergeben. Nur weil man meint, es sei ein "Radweg", heißt das leider noch lange nicht viel. Es wird nämlich unter anderem zwischen gemeinsamen und getrennten Fuß- und Radwegen, Fußwegen mit dem Zusatz "Radfahrer frei" und reinen Fußwegen unterschieden. Wo Radfahrer "nur" ein "frei"-Zusatzschild haben, kommt "yes" hin und nicht "designated". Bitte informiere dich im Voraus über die entsprechende Beschilderung vor Ort, bevor du etwas änderst. Ich habe deine Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht. Viele Grüße, Lukas
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:58:50+00:00): Might doublecheck geometry since I see this going out to the highway centerlines instead of the park boundaries.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:58:55+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55342647
user_5359 (2018-01-11 17:13:39+00:00): hello, Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-11 17:13:20+00:00): hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zors1843 (2018-01-11 08:46:07+00:00): Hi,
Dit is geen park in de zin van de wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Retired Account (2018-01-14 05:35:05+00:00): There is something wrong with this changeset. The park definitely does not cover the whole of a residential neighbourhood. Are you able to verify if this is correct?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-11 08:16:01+00:00): Heet deze school werkelijk Wamel en heeft deze nog een Engelse naam wamel? 
Volgens mij is het basisschool de Laak. ik verwijder je bijdrage in dit geval. 
We zouden het ook op prijs stellen als je zou reageren op vragen.
eggie (2018-01-11 08:19:39+00:00): Alle info staat  nu op de BAG adresnode.