piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mueschel (2020-09-24 16:57:47+00:00): Please check this relation, it got a strange tag. And: There is no need to make these relations if they are not used to group streets and houses together.
SiiG (2020-09-25 07:07:18+00:00): we have the obligation to display all the roads present in the municipality.
The displayed routes have been validated by the local elected officials of the municipality
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
zarl (2020-09-21 07:12:06+00:00): der dazugehörige trace ist hier: osm.org/user/zarl/traces/3422677
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
Vinber-Pro (2020-09-21 07:15:32+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est sans fin :)
à bientôt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91207292
Marina OT Bidart (2020-09-21 07:21:01+00:00): Salut Vincent !
Oui, toujours plus de précisions ;)
Bonne journée
mueschel (2020-09-24 16:48:55+00:00): Please check this node, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7927377347
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:57:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
MosKartograf (2020-09-21 09:39:51+00:00): Hello, MountStanley! You have destroyed the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1721131 relation! Please, be careful! The place around of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1155946843 is very complicated for maping.
MountStanley (2020-09-22 23:34:41+00:00): Hi MosKartograf, thanks for reaching out and fixing the broken multipolygon relation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
aharvey (2020-09-21 12:51:53+00:00): Great work. I saw this one recently but wasn't on my bike so didn't manage to grab a trace. There looked like cycleway on the eastern side too.
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-21 13:12:14+00:00): Thanks, from what I can see it's meant to be a separated version of the cross here with care, and that it makes its way somewhat sharply from the east side of the building to the west side of the tunnel exit. Good luck cycling on the freeway though, I couldn't do it myself in a million years. As for the other side, I've got some dashcam footage going away which I can check up on and add tomorrow.
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-22 01:08:30+00:00): I've added the other one here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91254020

It essentially does the same thing -- the shoulder changes path to guide you into the separated cycleway (with a bicycles must exit), and straight after the tunnel portal is fully underground, it reconnects with the M1 shoulder (with a watch for bicycles sign installed within the past couple of months).
aharvey (2020-11-08 00:47:54+00:00): I tried to survey this, but couldn't work out how to get access, at both the Pacific Highway onramp and Ku-ruing-gai Chase Road onramp there are no bicycle signs on M1 present.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-09 06:23:37+00:00): My best guess is that there is some form of ongoing construction or they need some sort of approval before they remove the signage. Given that there is signage I would think that its still a no go for a while
GinaroZ (2020-10-01 19:29:16+00:00): Might be better just setting this as access=no incase data consumers don't read the temporary:access tag?
James Derrick (2020-10-02 07:21:58+00:00): Hi GinaroZ, 

Given the closure duration is over a year, I've got to agree. When it re-opens it will need a re-survey anyway as both access roads are being remodelled with parking.

Adding both closure tags now!

Happy Mapping,

James
DressyPear4 (2020-09-28 14:23:35+00:00): Olá. por que você removeu as tags de identificação das edificações?
Eu as coloquei de volta.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:57:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
martinst (2020-09-28 18:02:05+00:00): Sind die Arbeiten jetzt beendet, kann der Weg wieder genutzt werden?
Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen (2020-09-29 06:51:13+00:00): Nachdem ich nichts mehr anderes von den Forstarbeitern gehört habe, sollte der Weg wieder frei begehbar sein. Wurde in OSM auch wieder so eingetragen
mavl (2020-09-21 16:57:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:57:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:57:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:56:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:56:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
user_2066394 (2020-09-21 09:54:45+00:00): operator=* , network=* , fee=* ?
eggie (2020-09-21 09:26:51+00:00): dag G bartels.. Zou niet elke keer als een pad een weg kruist een highway=crossing taggen. Dat is ongebruikelijk. 
.... of er moeten strepen op de weg staan?
Up to you.
Gr eggie
G_Bartels (2020-09-21 09:35:56+00:00): Bedankt. Ga kijken hoe ik dat kan voorkomen. Vermoedelijk met JOSM. Keertje op Linux zetten.
eggie (2020-09-21 09:40:00+00:00): Top!...JOSM in Linux,,  Dat kan wel. Er loopt ergens een forumdraadje hoe je dat het beste kunt doen.
Brandgangen gaan ongewenst meerouteren als je die intekent.
De brandgang is priveterrein van de bewoners. 
Zelf zet ik ze op access=private om dat te voorkomen. Niet iedereen wil via de randgangen een route krijgen in een routeplanner of gpsr.
Brandgangen die wel een doorgaande route hebben natuurlijk niet op slot zetten. 
eggie
G_Bartels (2020-09-21 14:42:04+00:00): Die wegen zitten tussen schuttingen in. Lijkt mij dus geen privéterrein te zijn. Kan ik foto's aan reacties toevoegen?
eggie (2020-09-21 15:32:30+00:00): Foto s toevoegen kan niet.. via een kink weer wel.
Bij die gangetjes tussen de schuttingen heb je recht van overpad. In de meeste gevallen is de 'vluchtroute'  eigendom.  Ook het onderhoud is voor de bewoners. Dat bewoners de toegang tot hun tuin barrikaderen is hun zaak.
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-21 09:08:43+00:00): Hi, it seem's you've flooded Mooney Mooney—I've changed the multipolygon back to a forest instead of a reservoir in 91215444

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
gsm81 (2020-09-22 06:05:36+00:00): Thank you!  I'll look closer at it and get my head around what i did wrong. Cheers
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-22 06:56:56+00:00): My best guess is that you wanted to apply the preset to something else but mis-clicked the multipolygon
gsm81 (2020-09-25 06:26:34+00:00): I think you are bang on.  Thank you again
trigpoint (2020-09-21 16:58:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however the Network Rail Depot is already mapped.
I have removed your duplication.

Cheers Phil
naveenpf (2020-09-23 01:30:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91213288
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-22 06:12:29+00:00): reedbed susitarėm žymėti meldus, reiškia tai yra ežero dalis, reiškia jų nereikia iškirpinėti iš ežero multipoligono.
Litawor (2020-09-22 06:20:56+00:00): Gerai, pataisysiu.
Iškirpau, nes JOSM fiksavo kaip klaidą.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-22 06:58:32+00:00): Abu pataisėm :-D Dėl JOSM klaidos tai reikėtų, matyt, parašyti į tagging sąrašyną ir paklausti: ar čia mums meldams reikia kitą žymą naudoti, ar JOSM klaidos pranešimas neteisingas.
skfd (2020-09-21 23:08:40+00:00): please stop cutting out lake from under floating buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91214167
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-09-27 19:13:27+00:00): Hi skfd,
The system was showing an error exactly for this building. In the tag details it was mentioned as building, if it was tagged as floating building, the changes would not have been made.
skfd (2020-09-27 19:17:16+00:00): please don't blame the system. you can not fix this error through satellite images. just put fiz me "is it floating or is it permanent?" and left locals survey it.
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-09-30 17:46:07+00:00): Thank you very much for this suggestion. It is really a good idea.
ToniE (2020-09-21 09:33:37+00:00): Hello Vinec,

I think this part is on public grounds, so 'private' is not approriate.
Additionally: routing/navigating here from the cycleway onto the street is now no longer possible - private way!

Another edit in another CS: highway=path implies foot=yes. highway=footway is the same as highway=path + foot= designated and foot=designated assumes that there is a sign (blue round sign with a person on it in Germany), which I think ist not given there.

Br
Toni

German:

ich denke, das Stück hier liegt noch auf öffentlichem Gelände -'private' ist daher nicht angebracht.
Zudem: vom Radweg kann hier nun nicht mehr auf die Straße navigiert werden, da es sich ja um einen Privatweg handelt?

Ein andere Edit von dir: highway=footway ist gleichbedeutend , mit highway=path + foot =designated, wobei foot=designated das Vorhandensein eines blauen Schildes bedeutet. Ich denke highway=path war dort besser?

Viele Grüße,
Toni
Vinec (2020-09-21 09:54:53+00:00): Hi,
Ja, da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen! Das müsste natürlich öffentlich sein, werde gleich schauen ob bei den anderen Edits, dass selbe passiert ist.
Ich schaue mir noch das andere Edit an
nurdafur (2021-01-07 17:53:22+00:00): Hallo Bielebog

Du hast in diesem Changeset und einem anderen zwischen Lippstadt und Cappel einige Anpassungen an der Historische Stadtkerne Route gemacht. Dabei hast du wie es scheint, Elemente zu der Superroute zugefügt statt die Anpassungen in der Etappe 2 einzutragen. Kannst du dies bitte nochmals überprüfen und gegebenenfalls korrigieren.

Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
bielebog (2021-01-09 12:33:57+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97210623 sind die Wege aus der Superroute entfernt. 
Danke für's Hinschauen.

LG Peter
abakus_uploader (2020-09-21 22:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:56:18+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91204240
DaCor (2020-09-25 19:35:31+00:00): Thanks for this edit in OpenStreetMap. If you have any other useful information for your local area please feel free to go ahead and add it to the map. You can also connect with other Irish mappers through https://www.openstreetmap.ie/contact/

Thanks, 
Dave
abakus_uploader (2020-09-21 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscscnd (2020-09-21 11:39:47+00:00): W opisach zestawów zmian dodawaj linki do ewentualnych uwag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1365407
Dodko (2021-05-30 18:41:02+00:00): V 9/2020 ste pridali duplicitne športové centrum hádzaná
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7927693247
ktoré tam existovalo v budove od 2/2017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101002004
Duplicitný bod som vymazal.
◪ Jarv (2020-09-21 11:24:54+00:00): Can you please stop re-mapping the cycle lanes which are already CORRECTLY mapped.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:52:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91217397
G_Bartels (2020-09-21 14:44:22+00:00): Volgens mij zijn het geen brandgangen aangezien ze niet over privéterrein lopen, maar tussen schuttingen.
eggie (2020-09-21 15:25:28+00:00): Toch is het zo dat het tussenpad eigendom is van de bewoners. Je hebt dan recht van overpad. Het kan beter niet routeren. Er zijn meerdere draadjes over te vinden op her forum.
Het is een vluchtroute in geval van calamiteiten en een manier om de tuin te bereiken. Dat bewoners alles dichttimmeren is hun zaak.
eggie (2020-09-21 15:45:09+00:00): Zie https://kadastralekaart.com/kaart/perceel/WGN00/K/683
G_Bartels (2020-09-21 16:05:33+00:00): Hm. Interessant. Zag het altijd als gewone wegen. Via jouw link kom ik bij https://bgtviewer.nl/5.646032593603227/51.97012798071166/19
G_Bartels (2020-09-21 16:13:29+00:00): Volgens mij zijn er ook geen boordjes dat het privé is. Maar bij de gemeente vragen wie voor de onderhoud verantwoordelijk is of hoe het daar zit.
eggie (2020-09-21 16:37:18+00:00): De BGT laat natuurlijk de wegen zien. Niet de eigendomskavels.
Wanneer iemand in dat achterommetjes z'n nek breekt over een losliggende tegel wegens achterstallig onderhoud ben je aansprakelijk.
Maar het zal van plaats tot plaats verschillen. 
In Dordrecht zijn de 'brandgangen' eigendom en het onderhoud is voor de bewoners. Net weer alles op nieuw laten straten samen met m'n achterburen. 
dat zal in Wageningen niet anders zijn.
Bordjes staan er nergens. Formeel zal het wel access=permissive zijn, maar dat voorkomt routering niet. er zijn overigens bewoners die wel art 461 bordjes neerzetten of hekken vooraan de gangetjes.
gscscnd (2020-09-21 12:24:15+00:00): <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways> — drogi rozdzielamy tam, gdzie są fizycznie oddzielone.
gileri (2020-09-21 09:58:18+00:00): Le message devrait être : commerce fermé
skfd (2020-09-21 23:13:50+00:00): зачем выключать навигацию под дороге для великов только потому что там рядом есть прогулочная неосвещенная дорожка. ето неправильно. (другое дело если бы там была велополоса)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91219917
Sergey82K (2020-09-22 08:07:56+00:00): Згідно ПДР рух велосипедів по автомобільній дорозі заборонений, якщо поряд є велосмуга. 
А так, можна відмітити і всі тротуари придатними для руху велосипедів та автомобілів. Все ж таки роутер має прокладати маршрут згідно чинних законів, а порушувати закони - це вже право водія.
skfd (2020-09-22 08:15:34+00:00):  я про то же самое и говорю. там неосвещенная и необорудованная прогулочная дорожка, а не велосмуга. велосмуги у нас пока только на Ярвалу и подобных местах.
такой маппинг не соответствует пдд и реальности
Sergey82K (2020-09-22 08:29:05+00:00): Там є і знак і розмітка і проїхати можна. В ПДР та інших законах немає формулювання "якщо погано освітлена...", "якщо по ній гуляють пішоходи...", "якщо на ній розгорнутий базарчик...". Як в ДБН прописали - так і побудували. Тому вважаю, що згідно чинних законів рух велосипедістів по проїзжій частині заборонений на цій ділянці.
Можемо ще в Телеграм-чаті підняти це питання.
SekeRob (2020-09-21 21:44:28+00:00): This pedestrian tunnel has been closed (fenced off) for probably 2 years if not longer. Reason unknown, one could speculate to include the 3rd rail track construction, but the closure was long before that work began. Anyway 20 meters  north the via Teramo has a good 2 meter wide pedestrian way now which makes that tunnel redundant. Not lit, a sinister way to use at night.
damianeue (2020-09-21 21:46:49+00:00): I didn't know it was closed since so much time, anyway last month I was there and I noticed it, I thought it was better to tag it that way because the more accurate info are the better it is
SekeRob (2020-09-21 22:00:48+00:00): Looked with Google streetview and on the east side there's a shield over it saying "passaggio pedonale verso via del Circuito". Suggest you mark the entrances both as barrier, fenced off, so it won't be used in route planners for city hikers.
gscscnd (2020-09-21 12:24:17+00:00): <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways> — drogi rozdzielamy tam, gdzie są fizycznie oddzielone.
philippec (2020-09-26 16:10:30+00:00): access ?
philippec (2020-10-30 21:34:11+00:00): Is een alfapass nodig ?
eggie (2022-08-15 07:01:06+00:00): Beste Ardaduck,

Waarom heb je het gebouw Gazellelaan 18 aangepast?
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91220366

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-15 07:06:42+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld conform de BAG data
eggie (2022-08-15 07:27:10+00:00): Wet je zeker dat hier een kerkgenootschap zit? Op hun site wordt dit adres niet genoemd?
http://www.lwg.nl
Groet
eggie
ardaduck (2022-08-15 07:48:26+00:00): Het bestaat gewoon maar is heel obscuur. Je moet daar zelf zijn om van het bestaan af te weten.

http://www.kruislinks.nl/kerk/levend-woord-gemeente-roosendaal-roosendaal/edit/
eggie (2022-08-15 07:55:21+00:00): Oke.. thanks.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2020-09-21 11:36:47+00:00): Best lastig water en landuse.. Volgens mij goed gelukt. Een stukje gras zit vast aan de man_made=bridge dat zou los kunnen.
Een man_made=bridge hoort layer=1 te krijgen.
de korte zijden van de brug 'moet' je verbinden met de eindnodes van  het lijngedeelte bridge=yes

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91220770

Gr eggie
sconijn (2020-09-21 20:36:46+00:00): Bedankt voor je review. Ik heb je opmerkingen verwerkt. Misschien kun je kijken of ik je goed heb begrepen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91248943#map=17/52.70164/4.95789
user_5359 (2021-02-07 11:29:02+00:00): Hello, You add some ways with boundary=admin(i)strative. I add the missing i. But this way is not closed. I create the relation https://www.osm.org/relation/12285600 for this combination.
az09 (2021-02-27 08:16:38+00:00): драмтеатр сломался(
вы бы iD не лезли в подобные вещи, берите JOSM для сложных построений. и приходите в t.me/ruosm, там научат))
eggie (2020-09-21 11:38:38+00:00): Review.. Lijkt me helemaal correct dat fietspad zo.
MVG,
eggie
Gh0stz0x (2020-09-30 10:16:36+00:00): Interessante. 🤔
Fabio Tremari (2020-10-01 14:40:30+00:00): Ciao Andrea, 
l'aggiunta del tratto di percorso pedonabile più tratto di sentiero nel bosco è frutto di un rilievo dal vivo non programmato durante una camminata estiva partendo da Madesimo paese per raggiungere il Lago Azzurro in località Motta Alta.
Bye!
BCNorwich (2020-09-21 13:58:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just wanted to let you know that someone deleted your new POI because it duplicated an already existing POI.

Regards Bernard.
czubi (2020-09-21 15:47:45+00:00): Bitte alles nur einmal hinzufügen, eine Adresse habe ich gelöscht
Cebderby (2020-09-21 11:22:55+00:00): In OSM, places like this are normally mapped as nodes as the boundary is rarely verifiable.  Please read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91222606
TcarterSYPTE (2020-09-21 14:23:38+00:00): Hi, this area has a well accepted boundary and its presence as a node is causing it to appear in address searches considerable distances from the area itself. Would be interested if you have any advice on this matter
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91222606