piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-22 03:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy
bkil (2022-09-20 17:39:22+00:00): Could you perhaps mention your sources in the future in the changeset metadata? We also welcome you on are next online gathering and chat https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20220923
redd (2023-07-23 21:43:37+00:00): Hallo Verrteildienst,
der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096311207 existiert hier so nicht.

Bitte um Korrektur.

Vielen Dank,

redd
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-20 20:12:14+00:00): edição revertida, usuário deletando vias que tive muito trabalho para mapear usando a camada Strava!
AWaltrick (2022-09-20 21:45:31+00:00): boa tarde!

Sou morador local e essa via não possui condições, situações onde usuários do mapa alegam terem se perdido. Qual o motivo para deixar isso mapeado?

Att,
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
redd (2023-04-07 18:39:40+00:00): Hallo Verteildienst,
der Zuweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096312289 existiert hier so nicht und habe ich wieder entfernt.

Bitte in Zukunft darauf achten eine Quellangabe zu machen über die Herkunft der Änderungen, das kann z.B. Luftbilder, Satellitenbilder oder Lokales Wissen sein.

Falls es sich beim Account um ein Gewerbe handelt, empfiehlt sich eine Impressumsangabe.

Vielen Dank für das Verständnis. 

redd
redd (2023-04-09 13:14:45+00:00): Kleines Update, ich war vor Ort und habe mir die Situation angesehen. Es besteht zum Haus Zeppelinstr 116/1 ein Zugang uber den Fussweg aber nicht direkt von der Zeppelinstrasse. Ich habe diesen Zugang nun erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160707833
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390
village (2022-11-26 15:18:40+00:00): Hi Claudius, war denn's Biomarkt wirklich als Interim in die Lage des (inzwischen ehemaligen) Edeka im Keller  umgezogen? (hat sich inzwischen geändert, siehe https://osm.org/changeset/129405926 und https://osm.org/changeset/129406112 )
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-23 07:54:22+00:00): skąd ta nazwa?
Mordechai23 (2022-09-23 07:56:19+00:00): okej sam znalazłem - była uchwała
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
roarroar (2022-09-20 19:41:31+00:00): Some buildings overlap
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126424798
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-09-22 23:17:48+00:00): Ciao Nick,

=grassland è per le aree naturali, in ambito urbano userei =grass
Cosa ne pensi?
Pink Duck (2022-11-11 15:39:30+00:00): Just because funding is not yet secured does not rule out the road won't happen. The whole point of highway=proposed is for roads with potential to exist in the future. If that potential has gone, then it can be deleted. Otherwise you should have left as is, with note.
JassKurn (2022-11-11 17:21:15+00:00): I've got to disagree with your definition of highway=proposed. There needs to be some form of schedule, and at least high potential for the project to happen. That is not created in the UK by a planning consent. With regard to this highway. When making the edit I was heading for deleting the way, based on Local Knowledge, but I don't like deleting work done by others. This is a small chance the project could be resurrected, but very unlikely. If there is no sign of the plan resurrecting over the next year I was going to delete the way. The result was, even if temporary, was this fudge of a tag. If you disagreed with the tag, or other data within the changeset, you should have made this comment first, then edited later.
Pink Duck (2022-11-11 17:43:39+00:00): I disagree with your view based on the single comment within the Talk page of highway=proposed. Per your own note, this idea has everything but the funded, and funded isn't happening soon, so to me it is a proposed route and should stay so.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 14:57:49+00:00): 태그가 없는 선들은 혹시 건물인가요?
아무런 태그가 없으면 나오지 않습니다.
건물이라면 building=yes를 추가하셔야지 정상적으로 나옵니다.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Jillis inactivE (2022-09-20 15:01:46+00:00): Goed gedaan, ik heb zelf nog wel het bruggetje en het parallelle kronkelpad bijgewerkt.
Jillis inactivE (2022-09-20 15:08:06+00:00): Bordje is zichtbaar overigens op Mapillary 360 graden foto: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.218486305556&lng=5.5336713055556&z=17&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=792382948058500&focus=photo&x=0.9537654602572486&y=0.49139544704748184&zoom=0.4030470914127422
eggie (2022-09-20 15:55:47+00:00): ... en alsnog... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ottwiz (2022-09-20 14:36:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dchurchyard
ruugie (2022-09-20 14:55:59+00:00): Yes, but why have you removed religion=christian?
ottwiz (2022-09-20 14:57:45+00:00): Ohh, I'll readd it. Just i wasn't sure if it's christian or not.
ruugie (2022-09-20 15:12:29+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/541106889 : Are you using more Bing or more Esri?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-30 23:35:29+00:00): porque criou vias que não existem aqui? tipo essa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096329105
joshjryan (2022-09-28 19:16:26+00:00): @sbelemy I had intentionally removed that section of road (changeset 124945536). It has been dug up and permanently removed as part of the project widening I-25.
https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2020/07/01/interstate-25-frontage-road-fort-collins-close-permanently/5352334002/
sbelemey (2022-09-30 05:01:31+00:00): Hello, joshjryan!
Thanks for your comment. I removed my changes with this road. 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/106204127

Best regards,
sbelemey
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-20 17:33:10+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87604841 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87604773 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3356960 ?

I poprawisz to na chodniki? Sporo tego na tym obszarze jest (prawidłowych krawężników co je zepsułeś)
rarad74 (2022-09-21 07:30:08+00:00): Salut. Te rog posteaza si tu in limba romana explicatiile changeseturilor sau macar in engleza, ca sa inteleaga si majoritatea  ce scrii pe acolo :p  Multumim.
grozsa11 (2022-09-21 08:18:22+00:00): Hello Razor74,
Thanks for your attention, I will do that.
PovilasDew (2022-12-23 13:14:47+00:00): Galvoju, gal Karaliaus Mindaugo pr. ir Birštono g. sankryžai nereikia išskirti tos salelės kur per vidurį, nes ji vis tiek už šviesoforo. Tas pats galiotų Prietilčio-Karaliaus Mindaugo pr. sankryžai.

Suprantu, kad čia dėl tos sekcijos tiesiai, kuri amžinai šviečia žaliai, bet traktuočiau, kad ten vis tiek šviesoforu reguliuojama kryptis.
ygcgjp5 (2022-12-23 13:59:35+00:00): Jo, aš čia tiesiog palikau kadangi tipo „salelė“. Tarp kitko jau čia supaprastintas variantas :-D Pradžiai buvo iš viso dar palikti nusukimai ne tik iš pietinės KM dalies, bet ir iš šiaurinės kur dabar ir gaunasi T sankryža taške 1629750431.

O tai kaip tada gautųsi? Iš viso panaikinti visus oneway ir tiesiog padaryt T sankryžą? Ir kaip su Maironio g. - ten šiauriniai nusukimai su perėja, taip gražiai nebesigautų.

Šiaip manau įmanomas variantas, nors man biški baisu tokias saleles supaprastinti. Tačiau vėlgi, salelės su perėja nenaikinčiau, bet dabar šitos salelės kažkokios iš viso bevertės...
PovilasDew (2022-12-24 13:54:53+00:00): Maironio g. yra ok, nes ten prasideda skiriamoji juosta, galima ir palikti.

Tomas talk-lt list'e pažymėjo, kad KM pr.-Birštono g. salelės naikintinos, tai ir panaikinau jau, dabar atrodo logiškiau, tiesiog turn:lanes sudėti reiktų ir juostų skaičių tvarkingai.

Maironio g. T formos sankryža su vad. bypass'ais. Tiesiog pačio gatvės pločio problema, kad tų bypass'ų nuvedimas komplikuotas.
PovilasDew (2022-12-24 13:55:27+00:00): *sorry pirmą sakinį turėjau nutrint, pasitikslinau, kad KM pr. be skiriamosios juostos iki pat S. Daukanto tilto.
PovilasDew (2022-12-24 13:57:07+00:00): Maironio g. tiesiog nuvesčiau tuos bypass'us į vidurinį vektorių kažkaip kad žemėlapy neatrodytų kreivai/keistai.
ygcgjp5 (2022-12-24 20:52:46+00:00): Visai neblogai dabar, biški dar lanes ir sidewalk sutaisiau
Hufkratzer (2022-09-21 11:19:23+00:00): Hi, why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096337923 with leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051695033 with leisure=pitch? I think leisure=pitch would be correct for both, compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena.
AdrianLangtry (2022-09-21 11:30:55+00:00): Well spotted, I have updated
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-09-20 18:30:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap ☺

Your changeset includes changes both in Mexico and the Netherland. This makes it spans over several countries, notifying a large number of mappers in between and making it hard to review. In the future, consider splitting your changes by country. Thanks in advance!

For more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
armitageone (2022-09-20 15:57:40+00:00): Готов поклясться, что я рисовал эту дорогу, но ока куда-то пропала.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
DaveF (2022-09-21 16:23:41+00:00): Hi
Please us ref instead of hole number
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
Mammi71 (2022-12-30 21:03:26+00:00): Hallo ticki_52,
ist das jetzt wirklich alles ein Reitplatz und surface=ground? Ich kenn das noch als Koppel mit grünem Gras und auf den letzten Luftbildern von August 2021 sieht es auch noch so aus. Reitplatz war da nur eine kleiner Platz hinter den Ställen.
ticki_52 (2023-01-04 19:08:13+00:00): Hallo Mammi71, die Fläche ist eine einfache Wiese/Weide. Hab' das so geändert... Das zugrundeliegende Foto war schon etwas älter.Ein Teil des Weilers ist wohl ein Pferdehof.
Ein schöne Gegend ist es allemal....

Grüße
richlv (2023-12-14 09:40:30+00:00): Sveiki, skatos, ka te ir mēģināts pievienot Jaunbērzu adreses punktu pie ēkas, kura no oficiālās adreses ir 150 metru attālumā.
Tā kā oficiālās adreses tiek sinhronizētas automātiski, no ēkas punkts visas reizes pazuda.
Ja adresi gribētos piešķirt tai konkrētajai ēkai, laikam vērts sazināties ar pašvaldību par adreses punkta precizēšanu.
The Kiotio (2023-12-14 19:15:56+00:00): Sveiki,
Paldies
Tā arī sapratu kad pirmo reizi adrese pazuda no mājas.
DD1GJ (2022-09-21 06:13:43+00:00): Hallo Ddema4125n,

das wird als Punkt auf der Straße eingetragen. Ich habe es bereits geändert und noch wheelchair=yes gesetzt, da es auf dem NRW-Luftbild aufgrund des Schattenwurfes nach einer abgesenkten Bordsteinkante aussieht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039916665

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing=traffic%20signals

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
aTarom (2022-09-20 18:20:18+00:00): Hola juanantoniopc
Bienvenido!
Respecto al elemento

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039806794/history

Puedes mirar en el siguiente enlace como se etiquetan correctamente los arboles
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

Si la lectura del enlace no te resuelve las dudas del etiquetado, puedes preguntar en el grupo de Telegram
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
otros canales como el nuevo foro
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51

Me dices algo
Saludos cordiales y gracias por participar
juanantoniopc (2022-09-20 19:14:20+00:00): OK! He añadido la etiqueta Tree, espero que correctamente. 
Gracias por  el comentario. 
Saludos.
aTarom (2022-09-21 05:13:20+00:00): Perfecto! vas por buen camino :D gracias por contestar
He optado por cambiar el resto de etiquetas a unas aceptadas por la comunidad y mostrarte los cambios en el siguiente enlace para ser más gráfico, este espacio es un poco reducido para explicaciones extensas

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/10039806794

lo revisas y lo que no veas claro no dudes en preguntar, no entiendo de Taxonomía y puedo haberme equivocado en algo

Gracias de nuevo por tu participación, saludos
chris2map (2025-02-11 16:35:02+00:00): Hi! What is "oilprivate" and "oilprivateprivate" as it is tagged as "content=" with the storage tanks? Saludos! Chris
MarkJeronimus (2022-09-20 19:03:57+00:00): De outline van het hoofdgebouw is vreemd. Er hangt een driehoek aan van type "Line" welke gewoon onderdeel is van het gebouw (overhang boven prive(?) stoep). Fout in BAG? Fixen?
Martin Borsje (2022-09-20 19:07:36+00:00): Ik zal eens kijken; een deel van het gebouw is een overhang; dat heb ik moeten aanpassen; wellicht niet geheel goed gegaan; kijk zo nog maar eens!
Martin Borsje (2022-09-20 19:09:41+00:00): Ik heb er nu building=roof van gemaakt ipv building:part=roof; kijken hoe dat rendert.
Patr1k_P (2022-09-22 10:02:29+00:00): building=house sa dava na domy so spolocnou stenou, na samostatny dom sa dava detached...viac info tu

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=house

...dalej "Orthophoto mosaic" je chybne, spravne a podla licencnych podmienok sa ma davat Ortofotomozaika SR, info o tom je tu 

https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/KMyJYfoKaM4/m/n_9JFT7yCAAJ

...to iste Kataster, ak kreslis podla katastralnej vrstvy, tak sa ma dat source=ZBGIS
arik123max (2022-09-22 14:33:01+00:00): to ortophoto mosaic musel byt preklep, na budovy som to ale dufam daval spravne ... Kataster bolo myslene tato vrstva - wms_endpoint:https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/eskn/services/NR/kn_wms_orto/MapServer/WmsServer
to asi nieje source=ZBGIS
arik123max (2022-09-22 14:53:06+00:00): a ak som dobre tu wiki pochopil, tak house je celkom vseobecny, iba tam je ze ak je castou spojeneho domu alebo radoviek, tak maju zdielat aspon 2 nody ... ale mozno to chapem zle
Dodko (2022-09-22 17:39:07+00:00): Tu máš 3 druhy katastra a pri každom je odklik kde sa určil source.

https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/oMjY5c0ZBAs/m/bzbNSQmOBAAJ
Patr1k_P (2022-09-22 18:11:13+00:00): Je to wms vrstva od zbgis, takže by tam mal byt podla toho source

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Sources
fgouget (2022-09-24 11:47:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Quelle est votre source pour l'ajout de ces trois éoliennes Marocaines ?

Cordialement,
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-15 06:39:45+00:00): Reverted following complaints to DWG. None of the items mapped are visible on any imagery, & User has not responded to any requests for information: 
changeset/131287513
monotar (2022-10-17 22:46:36+00:00): wieder ein fragwürdiger Edit. Unzählige Abbiegebeschränkungen gelöscht die korrekt waren. Nun sind die Kreuzungen alle falsch. Kann nicht erkennen was solche Edits bringen sollen!!!
monotar (2022-10-18 00:04:29+00:00): destination wurde auch noch gelöscht, wirklich eine Frechheit! Warum werden dann noch Wege gelöscht und neu angelegt, womit die Nachvollziehbarkeit weg ist? Das grenzt schon an Vandalismus!
MikiDi (2022-09-20 17:36:26+00:00): Typo in changeset comment: should be "Added Covid victims memorial plaque"
bxl-forever (2022-09-20 21:17:01+00:00): Shouldn’t it be "À la mémoire" instead of "A la memoire"?  Accented capitals matter.
MxxCon (2022-09-21 07:26:44+00:00): Hello.
Are all 3 buildings here have the same street address?
WonderED (2022-09-21 12:40:24+00:00): Yes, I believe so. They all are in the same parcel (lot 19). Montclair Gardens apartments. I think it's possible to have multiple street addresses in a lot, but that's not the case here.
MxxCon (2022-09-22 02:00:09+00:00): Hmm, i see that https://www.themontclairgardens.com points to a different location not too far away with a different address. 🤔Two apartment complexes with the same name in the same town?
WonderED (2022-09-22 12:00:24+00:00): I will take care of it.
WonderED (2022-09-22 12:24:54+00:00): Street imagery shows a Montclair Gardens sign at 180 Orange Road as well. I removed the name from 180 Orange Road but I will continue to look at this.
eggie (2022-09-21 07:59:43+00:00): Dag Mark.. Ik heb hier wat verbindingen naar de Grote Belt gemaakt als voorbeeld. Voor de routering. 
Groet
eggie
mangerlahn (2023-10-06 10:33:13+00:00): Überall in Anger-Crottendorf haben die Straßen das Tag foot=use_sidepath. Doch nur in bestimmten Bereichen sind Fußwege separat eingezeichnet. Bei dem Rest ist das sidewalk Attribut direkt auf der Straße gesetzt. Resultat des Ganzen ist dadurch, dass hier das Routing z.B. mit Organic Maps komplett im Eimer ist und mir vorhin ein 2km Umweg angezeigt wurde. Kannst du da noch mal schauen und use_sidepath löschen, wo es keinen Sinn macht?

Hier sieht man, wo das überall benutzt wird. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1BvC
דוד-צבי (2022-09-23 06:51:25+00:00): Sir, this is against the community rules.
as i've explained in my edit description, what matter is the color of the road number sign and nothing else.
As mentions here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Inter-city_roads
and I quote: "First rule for numbered roads: The category is determined by the color of the sign" and later: "Motorways mostly have an {Freeway_sign} sign at the entrances, *but not necessarily*."
Indeed, this section of the road still have a blue road number sign, in any term: in Google Maps, Wikipedia, and most importantly - physically. I drove the road personally to check the physical signs all along the road.
So please stop cancel my marking against the rules, especially without giving real reason!
*That including road number 5
Car162 (2022-09-24 07:16:05+00:00): First, the table said that  "Expressways / trunk in Israel can look very much like a freeway" and have speed limit of "100 km/h" and the speed limit in the part of road 1 from Sha'ar Ha-Guy interchange to Yiga'el Yadin Interchange is 90 km/h which is similar to the Ha'Arava part of road 90

Second, blue signs can appear also in case that the destination are intercity, for example see this photo: 
https://jerusalem.mynet.co.il/picserver/mynet/crop_images/2022/09/01/rk00Ry1AJs/rk00Ry1AJs_0_0_640_360_0_large.jpg . the photo display sign to and the Tel-Aviv destination in Beit interchange in road 16 to west direction