piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jinalfoflia (2017-04-10 11:25:36+00:00): Hi biblioteca paya,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thank you for your contributions! 

In this changeset, I have seen you have detailed mapping of this city, 'Paya'. I would love to know the source you have referred to add this data? As the Bing and Mapbox imagery doesn't seem to clear at this location. 

Thank you,

Jinal Foflia
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
zors1843 (2017-04-08 06:41:43+00:00): Do you have more info on the sculpture ?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Jakka (2017-04-09 08:16:44+00:00): The Volvo was alreudy added Thx see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44733342#map=15/51.0898/3.7813
archie (2018-05-22 04:39:42+00:00): Du har använt "service=drive-through" i några fall i samband med "highway=service". Jag har svårt att se att detta passar in här. Se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=drive-through?uselang=sv
Det vore intressant att få veta varför du valde detta tag-set i dessa fall.
fatuus (2018-05-26 00:07:50+00:00): Jag har missuppfattat taggen. Har inte läst om den på wikin ...
calfarome (2017-04-10 19:04:46+00:00): Hi Brian@Brea, 
May I know the reason why did you delete  points of interest in this changeset?  see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47551820
Brian@Brea (2017-04-10 23:44:50+00:00): Because the building is being demolished
calfarome (2017-05-04 14:11:26+00:00): Thank you for your clarification!
GerdP (2017-08-27 07:26:50+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=tracktype
on two ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236729313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236729314
Did you mean highway=track or did you want to add tracktype=* to the bridleway?
moosfrosch (2023-09-19 12:23:01+00:00): Das ist nicht "unclosed", das ist nur bei Hochwasser am Einfluss verbunden, wie jeder Altarm. Das ist kein Fluss, da fließt normalerweise nichts. Habe das wieder korrigiert; ich kenne die Gegend gut.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-04-08 06:27:40+00:00): Hmm, czy na pewno chciałeś wycofać mój zestaw zmian? http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=274228304
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-04-08 06:28:48+00:00): Chodzi o to, że w tym parku teraz znowu są highway=residential...
maraf24 (2017-04-08 07:01:29+00:00): Tu były konflikty. Widać źle je rozwiązałem. Poprawię.
Alexander-II (2017-07-10 23:50:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Роща" - это официальное название растительности или это вы её так называете?
balalaika (2017-07-11 17:31:51+00:00): Привет. Скорее наоборот - не официальное, но принятое всем местным населением.
Alexander-II (2017-07-11 22:42:06+00:00): Тогда прошу вас указывать такое в loc_name
balalaika (2017-07-13 09:51:34+00:00): Спасибо за замечание. Вся "растительность" отмечена одним мултиполигоном. Если давать название, то необходимо разбить всё это богатство минимум на меньшие мультиполигоны и учесть, что: 
"Роща" - небольшой участок облагороженного леса на ЮЗ с дорожками, площадками;
"Радиополе" - остальной "дикий" участок територри ограниченный забором до границы МТУСИ на западе и жилой зоной на юге.
И, собственно, оставшийся "культурные" участк: западный кусок зелени на територри МТУСИ, южный кусок в жилой зоне.
Я не готов этим заняться. Возможно есть другие варианты организации, но я ими не владею.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-04-13 13:49:53+00:00): Melduję, że Krzysio znowu napsuł.
maraf24 (2017-04-13 16:05:37+00:00): Przewidziałem to i mam tą drogę w automatycznym monitoringu.
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-14 19:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55440691 where the changeset comment is: revert bad import
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-14 19:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55440691 where the changeset comment is: revert bad import
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-10 11:17:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55319363 where the changeset comment is: revert bad import
SomeoneElse (2017-04-07 22:27:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
One small thing - you're naming each changeset "small corrections".  This doesn't really help explain to other mappers what change you're making and what the source of that change was.  It'd help other mappers if you could explain in a little more detail each change.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; just trying to help.
Best Regards,
Andy
dgitto (2017-04-08 06:30:21+00:00): Please do not change names. The name was via 4 novembre, as stated in the wiki page about the "name with dates" in italy (linked to you lot of times).
Moreover, if you change the tag name, pay attention to change accordingly the tag addr:street into each housenumber
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 20:35:55+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 20:41:00+00:00): in this street af acitrezza signal there's it is written "Via IV November" with roman numbers, not the common numbers for several historic and cultural reasons. i've been there and i know it. and the local people from acitrezza are just fine with it. Via 4 Novembre could be an alt_name
dgitto (2017-04-08 21:22:12+00:00): Ahh sorry. You are YOU. Sorry. Cheers
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 21:23:46+00:00): roman numbers again  https://www.tripadvisor.it/Restaurant_Review-g1028935-d10750544-Reviews-Pizzeria_Ai_Quattro_Canti-Aci_Castello_Province_of_Catania_Sicily.html
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 21:27:01+00:00): roman numbers in historic date name streets again and again   https://tinyurl.com/lnglh85
Kadaj (2017-04-12 12:55:21+00:00): The foot paths go through the building. Zoom in and you can occasionally see the sidewalk, but it runs through the building on each side and connects in the middle in the front.
trigpoint (2017-04-08 11:00:41+00:00): Hi, should footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485430915 not connect to Bynner Street, rather than the Prince of Wales car park, it should also connect to the service road (probably needs parking_aisle too). I did spot some sort of path there yesterday after a couple of Threads to get a chinese. Will have to explore, but do you know its legal status? It looks a useful cut through.
Also what is Prospet House, it looks large and should probably have some sort of operator tag.
zvenzzon (2018-12-20 10:23:54+00:00): Why are you changing the tagging of "Beach Arena" to a pitch? What source are you using?Is this an automatic edit? If yes, has this been discussed?
Peilscheibe (2017-04-09 21:08:56+00:00): Hallo silassinho, Du hast hier und in vorigen Changesets verschiedene Erhebungen als Gipfel mit Höhe eingetragen. Was ist denn die Quelle dieser Information? Vor Ort ist das ja nicht ausgezeichnet.
trigpoint (2017-04-08 11:14:48+00:00): Hi, I know the tagging here was inconsistent. But this section was probably right.
Kingsland Bridge and the associated roads are privately owned and not PROW hence access=permissive was correct.
SK53 (2017-04-12 11:07:35+00:00): I very much doubt the buildings with name=Beaconsfield Street are actually called that. I imagine the tag should be addr:street. Please do check when tweaking tags that they actually make sense!
nyuriks (2017-04-17 20:22:16+00:00): thanks, silly mistake, i looked at them but my mind didn't register the weirdness. Thanks for catching it!
jpennycook (2017-04-08 17:01:51+00:00): Hello.

Can you tell me why you deleted the cyclepath to the right-hand side of Kingsmead, next to Premier Inn, in Farnborough?  It existed last weekend when I cycled along it - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325993689/history

You also 

Jon
jpennycook (2017-04-08 17:04:18+00:00): sorry - I submitted too early.  You also deleted two other footways that I had edited.
keithonearth (2017-04-08 00:51:44+00:00): oops, the source wasn't bing, it was a survey.
yurasi (2017-04-10 17:04:44+00:00): Hi dahliarj
Thanks for contributing on OSM. I was discovering about the name of this gym in the web, for this reason I changed the name, but you returned to put the prior name. Can you explian me why? What is your source or is local knowledge?
Dalkvist (2017-04-08 02:55:29+00:00): Är det en bilväg du lagt in? Det ser mer ut som en skogsbilväg eller stig på flygbilderna, i så fall är det track eller path. Samt att "parken" ser mer ut som en villaträdgård de bör vara leisure=garden och garden:type=residential
Mapeiro (2017-04-09 00:25:16+00:00): Oi Ademir,

Dois detalhes:
1- Nomes são escritos com letras maiúsculas e minúsculas, não tudo em maiúsculo.
2- Altitude fica num campo separado e não como parte do nome.

Já fiz as correções.
Valeu por ter marcado esse morro!
tonyf1 (2017-04-08 08:05:17+00:00): Hi Addison, you say "somehow they disappeared". They were deleted by a very experienced user, presumably because he thought the names weren't verifiable see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47528007
Borut@OSM (2017-04-08 07:37:31+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund warum bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2469976411 der name="Dr. OMR Margarete Schallaböck" gelöscht wurde, oder war es einfach ein Irrtum?
Edwin Reiter (2017-04-08 13:58:55+00:00): Meines Wissens gibt es die Ordination schon lange nicht mehr. Auch die Telefonnummer ist nicht mehr vergeben. Am Haus wurde die Tafel ebenfalls entfernt?
Supaplex (2017-05-12 08:14:21+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
AkuAnakTimur (2017-04-08 08:45:19+00:00): Don't forget, it's for Pendang district as well. Just leave it blank for the time being.
AkuAnakTimur (2017-04-08 08:48:52+00:00): Because it's an incomplete (open) relation as well, if it's not me, then those who do QA will remove this in the near future. I have to remove this for now. Don't worry, there's a tool to undelete this.
tonyf1 (2017-04-08 06:44:36+00:00): Hi Addison. Welcome to Open Street Map and thanks for your contributions. I am however a bit doubtful as to whether some of the names belong on a public map. The names should be verifiable, that is other people would know these features by the same name, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability which explains this
trigpoint (2017-04-08 11:36:41+00:00): Hi, mae hyn yn ddefnydd rhyfedd iawn o'r briffordd = preswyl. Fel arfer, ffyrdd sy'n arwain at ffermydd yn cael eu mapio fel naill ai annosbarthedig neu wasanaeth yn dibynnu ar amodau'r mynediad.
Hefyd dylai'r sylwadau changeset fod mewn iaith glir fel y gall mappers eraill yn deall, yna yn hytrach na twitteresque gobbledy gook.

Hi, this is a very odd use of highway=residential. Roads leading to farms are normally mapped as either unclassified or service depending on access conditions.
Also changeset comments should be in plain language so other mappers can understand then rather than twitteresque gobbledy gook.
MalingaGIS (2017-04-08 14:51:24+00:00): Hi, trigpoint. Thank you very much for the correction. I update these as highway=service, it seems those are farms. I thought it was residential. 

Will included the meaning full comments. Thanks again.
trigpoint (2017-04-08 15:14:41+00:00): Thank you for making the corrections, however your changeset comment is still hashtaged, hashtags belong on twitter, not in OSM, thanks.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-10 06:22:04+00:00): Hi  PeetTheEngineer,

You added `highway = yes` tag to the features which doesn't exist in OSM. Can you change it and give a appropriate one.

Regards,

Upendra
GerdP (2017-10-23 09:05:14+00:00): Digital Globe seems to show a highway=track next to the rails. I assume this was meant with highway=yes?
If yes, draw the highway as an extra way.
Hjart (2017-04-08 06:05:51+00:00): Welcome to Denmark.
I have removed a bit of this track, as it appeared to be quite temporary (my old man was a farmer and I've seen lots of these) as well done a few other edits to the area.
MalingaGIS (2017-04-08 14:57:38+00:00): Hi Hjart, Its nice to hear the correction. Appreciate it, you are most welcome.
CloCkWeRX (2017-04-08 12:35:38+00:00): Oh, let me see what's on my bike camera from today, rode around a bunch of Glenelg... will upload to mapillary
Qwertii (2017-04-08 13:35:28+00:00): That would be sweet, loads of stores around here that need to be added.
sorcrosc (2017-04-08 14:37:22+00:00): Ho modificato il nome mettendo "Poste Italiane" come operator
dgitto (2017-04-08 15:27:16+00:00): +1. E perché la preposizione "Di" in maiuscolo? Eh eh
sorcrosc (2017-04-08 15:48:27+00:00): Non ci ho fatto caso. Correggo :)
eggie (2017-04-08 07:27:53+00:00): Foot is yes hoeft niet op fietspaden. In Nederland moet je zelfs op het fietspad lopen als er geen voetpad is. 
Dat kan er af.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-04-08 07:32:21+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan..
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
eggie (2017-04-08 07:36:41+00:00): Groen is default.. dus hoeft niet getagd te worden.
De eerste mappingdays (ook met lange tussentijd) worden dor ons gevolgd. Ook om te helpen. vandaar..  :)
eggie (2017-04-08 07:50:56+00:00): What do you mean with information?
..... travelagent?
freebeer (2019-09-08 22:43:03+00:00): hi,
is it reasonable for me to guess that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485456380 , as well as the small road branching it, should both be tagged with `surface' in place of `ur', and `un' should be filled with the remaining -paved?
Johnny Carlsen (2019-09-09 07:33:45+00:00): That is correct, I have fixed it now.
eggie (2017-04-08 07:15:57+00:00): Lampier.. Je kunt ook de kadaster pdok 2016 kiezen als achtergrond. 
De url voor editor iD is http://whoots.mapwarper.net/tms/{zoom}/{x}/{y}/Actueel_ortho25/http://geodata.nationaalgeoregister.nl/luchtfoto/wms?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Actueel_ortho25&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}
Nog beter is om over te schakelen op editor JOSM. Daar zit die achtergrond al ingebakken. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:JOSM/Guide
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 21:49:49+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
オプンストリトマップ (2017-04-08 21:47:26+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
Roland Pallai (2017-09-02 21:07:36+00:00): Szia! "A téglagyártól ÉNY irányban jelzett kb 1 km-es út 100 m után gyalog is járhatatlan" Errol van szo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273213783#map=17/47.58789/18.98529

Ennek fenyeben en visszatennem a proposed lcn-t a patak melletti track-ra ahogy eredetileg volt. Mit szolsz hozza?
City-busz (2017-09-03 01:43:33+00:00): Ha az jobban járható, akkor oké. Én az Országos Kéktúra útvonalváltozását vettem alapul, de még nem jártam be a konkrét helyszínt: http://mtsz.org/cikk/valtozott_az_okt_nyomvonala_a_rozalia_teglagyar_kornyeken
nyuriks (2017-08-22 08:51:59+00:00): Hi, I found a number of duplicate items (mostly stores). I have been deleting them, but you might want to check your script - seems like it creates dups. Also, I am moving wikidata -> operator:wikidata (per wiki). It makes tags much easier to process later. Thanks!
TechnoFreak (2020-06-21 21:47:23+00:00): Hi DanGregory,

I was just went to update the pontoons at trafalgar wharf as they have put some new ones down. I could have sworn I'd mapped the existing ones already. After a bit of digging I found out that some of them had been deleted by this changeset. I'm assuming you deleted them because they are not on the satellite imagery but I can assure you, they are there :o) I'm going to try to work out how to revert them but please be careful when you delete things if you haven't been to the place recently. 

Regards,

Rob
eggie (2017-04-08 08:52:03+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”
De vraag is wat je motief is om dit zo te mappen. Bovendien heb je belangrijke adresinfo verwijderd.
Graag reactie


Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-08 09:04:52+00:00): Reverted .. Whiskey Heaven. BAG adresnodes hersteld.
Je kunt reageren.
eggie (2017-04-08 09:06:22+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Rembo III (2017-04-08 09:10:55+00:00): Welke adresinfo had ik verwijderd?
eggie (2017-04-08 09:59:22+00:00): De adresinfo van de gebouwen. Die horen op de BAGnodes. niet op een gebouw zelf.
Als je nog vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
Je andere edits heb ik alleen aangepast. Probeer je eerst in te lezen. Zie links boven.
Startende mappers worden gevolgd... ook om te helpen. Anders zou er nier veel van de kaart overblijven.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:29:01+00:00): Hier gaat het erom dat er geen vervuiling optreedt. Geen persoonlijke notes dus en niet verwijderen van adresnodes, behalve als het gebouw echt gesloopt is en er niet meer terugkomt. 
We volgen met een team beginnende mappers. .. ook om te helpen. Kijk ook op het forum. Daar  zit de knowhow.. altijd bereid ook tot assistentie.  
Je kunt jezelf voorstellen onder het draadje Welkom.
dell4valt (2017-04-18 13:08:44+00:00): Уважаемый, зачем вы убрали теги building со зданий?
eggie (2017-04-08 09:00:08+00:00): Dit gebied is als geheel landuse=industrial. Dus Industrial in Industrial is te veel van het goede. Ik heb dat verwijderd.
Rembo III (2017-04-08 09:18:21+00:00): Akkoord
kozlorf (2019-08-23 22:50:04+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa: "Jałowcowy las"? Nie pojawia się ona nigdzie lokalnie, dajmy na to tablicach informacyjnych.
DeltaWhizkey (2019-08-24 03:08:09+00:00): Nazwa lasu figuruje w Państwowym Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych na Geoportalu (geoportal.gov.pl).
tkedt (2017-04-08 09:48:35+00:00): Twoje zmiany spowodowały nieprawidłową lokalizację większości przystanków wzdłuż drogi 2836W (w porównaniu z infrastrukturą widoczną w Geoportalu). Poprawiłem te lokalizacje i przesunąłem drogę do osi jezdni widocznej w Geoportalu.
Nie łącz wielu przystanków w 1 węzeł i nie przyklejaj ich do landuse=residential. Sklejanie dróg, granic i landuse też nie jest zalecane (patrz np. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19518).
eggie (2017-05-05 08:27:21+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
tkedt (2017-04-08 10:04:02+00:00): Zmiany w tym zestawie też naprawiłem.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:30:13+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Rembo III (2017-04-08 10:24:45+00:00): Wat was er needless? Heb je het voetpad ook verwijderd?
eggie (2017-04-08 12:19:46+00:00): Neee... dit was een goede edit.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47562524
Alleen foot designated is default. Dat hoeft er niet op. bicycle=no hoeft niet. Fietsers mogen niet op voetpaden. idem motor_vehicle.
Zie hier. Wat groen is hoef je niet te taggen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands

Elk land is weer een beetje anders.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:19:58+00:00): Succes verder.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:23:43+00:00): Verder hebben wij als surfacetags. gravel en fine_gravel. Op fietspaden wordt fine_gravel als verhard gezien. Net als shells en compacted. Gravel zijn echt grove steentjes en is moeilijk te fietsen.
In Frankrijk is alles gravel getagd, maar in feite fine_gravel. Ze worden als onverhard gezien maar zijn prima te fietsen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-04-08 09:16:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47408490, 47408506, 47408631, 47408658, 47408723, 47408907, 47408946, 47408974, 47409221, 47409251, 47409300, 47409418, 47409740, 47409770, 47410030, 47410097, 47410408, 47432811, 47439259, 47439325, 47439342, 47439427, 47439480, 47439530, 47439591, 47439635, 47472163, 47472235, 47472369, 47472439, 47472476, 47472911.
Vladislav D (2017-04-09 23:33:40+00:00): Мне кажется, лучше указывать настоящие названия + с большой буквы как это принято на картах.