piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
izolight (2022-01-11 13:15:16+00:00): Following the wiki (both https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Map_Features and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Korea_Road_Classification) a national road would be trunk.
Even if it has an intersection it would be trunk in my opinion as the classification should be regarding the importance of the road which would be the classification as national road.
user_5239402 (2022-01-28 09:08:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Korea_Road_Classification This is a discussion document. It is not yet ready for use!!
user_5239402 (2022-01-28 09:08:43+00:00): Please discuss this topic on the talk-ko mailing list.
user_5239402 (2022-01-28 09:11:54+00:00): link is very old In Korea, trunk tag is not used on all national roads. Although it is called "National Road" (a logo with a number inside a blue oval) in Korea, this tag should not be used on all national roads.
user_5239402 (2022-01-28 09:13:00+00:00): In Korea, national roads use the primary tag. A trunk is used on a national road divided by a structure (median or junction).
user_5239402 (2022-01-28 09:53:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Korea_Road_Classification

Korea Road Classification

This is a discussion document. It is not yet ready for use!! Please discuss this topic on the talk-ko mailing list.
izolight (2022-01-28 10:40:28+00:00): You are right this isn't totally clear, we need some clear rules.
I sent an email to the mailing list.
habi (2022-01-11 09:58:16+00:00): Die Minigolf-Anlage ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202080641 schon seit 9 Jahren erfasst.
Hier hätte es evtl. Sinn gemacht, diese 'alte' Fläche anzupassen.
Lee Carré (2022-01-11 10:22:59+00:00): See discussion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11863662
zstadler (2022-09-19 18:12:49+00:00): שלום יואב,

אנא המנע מהעריכה של המפה הציבורית עם פרטים של מסלולים אישיים

החזרתי ל"עין מרים" את שמה המקורי
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-13 17:23:39+00:00): Ar tikrai optikos pasaulis yra nuosavame name?
eggie (2022-01-11 10:20:57+00:00): Hi Aleksey.. Welcome to OSM.
Please use the present addressnodes.
Louwman Lexus Utrecht is already tagged at the building_shape.
Perhaps better combining these tags at the addresnode. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-01-11 10:26:50+00:00): I merged the companyname with addressnode 53 according consensus tagging at the addressnodes. 
Lexus is also tagged at that very addressnode.
Up to you.
eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:10:36+00:00): Hi eggie!Thanks for your corrections to the Louwman Lexus Utrecht address node. Your helpful feedback will help me in my future work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116016316
user_5359 (2022-01-13 07:55:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6111501589? Which language is ruotsi?
TomN1 (2022-01-13 08:45:20+00:00): Fixed, thanks
Ahmed karay (2022-01-21 07:22:12+00:00): shark teamExplore By Topics
All Shark series are categorized into various topics. This should provide you with an alternate way to decide what to learn next, whether it be a particular framework, language, or tool.
BCNorwich (2022-01-11 12:21:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You requested a review, this is very difficult due to the large number, (over 100),  of features that are contained in this single changeset. You had two highway warnings in this changeset, to find and correct those warnings one has to now go through a lot of the individual edits. So it's a good policy to upload edits regularly with ten to twenty edits per upload (changeset). Also, please keep your editing in a reasonably small bounding box (area).

Anyway, I'll try to go through everything and make the necessary corrections. 
The first problem is the joining footway Way: 1020234952 to cable line Way: 388353168.
The tag name=Suds Area, Suds Area would not be a formal verifiable name I've changed the tag to description=Sustainable urban drainage systems, several of these.
I've squared up all of the buildings.
I removed the farmland multipolygon Relation 11039673 as it's a mere polygon.

I made quite a few corrections and squared up all the buildings but that was a pretty good first editing session. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-01-11 12:16:48+00:00): Please check the website for the right address
https://www.strikwerda.nl/contact/...
Daniil_E (2022-01-13 09:13:13+00:00): Hello eggie,

I appreciate the provided feedback. All changes have been made in the following link: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116097557). 

Regards,
Daniil.
eggie (2022-01-13 09:23:57+00:00): Oke...... but... I see two Toyota companies? Nr 12 en nr 16..
According the website it must be
De Alde Mar 12, 9035 VP Dronrijp

0517 - 727 800

dronrijp@strikwerda.nl

Greetz,
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-01-11 23:37:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JeroenHoek (2022-01-11 11:10:16+00:00): Tip: voeg de POI samen met de bijbehorende adresnode. Nu maak je een losse POI aan terwijl het adres (Zuiderkruisweg 6) er gewoon naast staat.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-11 11:11:49+00:00): Kies ook de shop-waarde die het beste past. Dus of car, of car_repair.

Zie ook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar
E de Wit (2022-01-11 12:00:59+00:00): Thanks for adding. I would personally prefer to use the name 'Toyota Strikwerda'. This is how it is advertised in front of the shop. And would be closer to how customers tend to call the shop.

-E de Wit
Daniil_E (2022-01-13 09:10:30+00:00): Hello,

Appreciate the provided feedback. Will take it into consideration in further work. I made all fixes that can be checked here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116096862).

Best regards,
Daniil.
habi (2022-01-11 10:59:25+00:00): Ich habe im Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116019057 dein Einzelpunkt des Minigolfs mit der (schon seit 9 Jahren erfassten) Fläche zusammengefügt.
habi (2022-01-11 10:59:50+00:00): Heisst die Minigolf-Anlage übrigens wirklich 'Minigolf mit 18 Bahnen' ?
abakus_uploader (2022-01-11 23:37:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-01-12 11:37:17+00:00): Hello! Did you really mean admin_level for this landuse area?
JeroenHoek (2022-01-11 11:16:45+00:00): Er staat op het pand al een Hyundai dealer getagd. Vervalt die?

Het is in Nederland gebruikelijk dat POI's die als node gemapt worden samengevoegd worden met de adresnode. Zou je dat hier ook willen doen?

Daarnaast is het niet gebruikelijk om shop=car;car_repair te taggen. Kies een van de twee (welke maar het beste past) zoals op de wiki gedocumenteerd staat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar
Nadzeya_ (2022-01-12 16:05:28+00:00): Hi, JeroenHoek!
Thanks for your feedback I have updated all data with your comments. Regards, Nadzeya_
JeroenHoek (2022-01-13 09:22:23+00:00): Thanks!
SekeRob (2022-01-14 16:52:28+00:00): Please use the change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116155233 as future reference how to map 'inner' areas without causing "way_in_multiple_rings".

cheers
impiaaa (2022-06-29 15:49:18+00:00): When editing "*:lanes" tags, make sure that ALL tags ending in "*:lanes" refer to the same number of lanes. Here, you removed a lane from the "turn:lanes" tag but the "change:lanes" tag still refers to one more.
andreia2_telenav (2022-07-04 07:00:43+00:00): Hello, sorry for the late response. Thank you for this observation and for the correction. I'll keep that in mind from now.
Have a nice day!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 06:09:21+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and restore removed tags on Pioneer Plumbing building/POI in changeset 183625575

https://osm.org/changeset/183625575
eggie (2022-01-12 10:17:34+00:00): mefged info with addressnode
eggie (2022-01-12 10:17:55+00:00): Please use the present addressnode
gr eggie
NastiaP1 (2022-01-12 14:46:01+00:00): Hello, Eggie!
Thank you for your feedback and correction.
Best regards,
Nastia
eggie (2022-01-12 10:13:23+00:00): merged info with addressnode
NastiaP1 (2022-01-12 14:44:45+00:00): Hello, Eggie!
Thank you for your feedback and correction. It was very helpful
Best regards,
Nastia
aaronsta (2022-01-11 14:34:29+00:00): Hi Richie,
Thanks for the edit!
Please review the Wiki and familiarise yourself with how to correctly tag roads, paths, etc which are under construction.
Cheers
englu (2022-01-18 16:47:56+00:00): Czy drogą 1018336851 nie da się obecnie przejść? Na heatmapie Stravy (https://www.strava.com/heatmap#17.10/16.99388/51.28653/hot/all) widać, że są nagrane ślady.
englu (2022-01-18 16:52:37+00:00): Czy nie lepiej zostawić highway=track i ustawić trail_visibility=horrible? Takie tagi pozostawią możliwość routowania, które obecnie przestało działać na tej drodze, a jest tam żółty szlak.
Nieunikniony (2022-01-18 22:00:15+00:00): Cześć,
Latem dało się przejść, ale przez zboże, jak ktoś znał szlak. 2 lata temu była ścieżka na miedzy przy linii drzew. W ostatnim sezonie rolnik zaorał wszystko. Pewnie zimą da się przejść. Nie wiem czy rolnik pogoni turystów jak zobaczy, nie wiem czyj jest grunt. W każdym razie fajnie by było wyłączyć rutowanie, przynajmniej dla rowerów - po zaoranym polu kiepsko się jeździ.
Pozdrawiam
englu (2022-01-21 09:33:03+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za odpowiedź. W takim razie zamieniłem track na path i dodałem brak przejazdu dla rowerów. Przy okazji poprawiłem tag trail_visibility. Pozdrawiam
Monchinho (2022-01-11 12:29:23+00:00): Prezado compañeiro. Na toponimia oficial do proxecto Galicia Nomeada aparece, efectivamente, pronunciado /kru'ido/ (Cruído), mais decidiuse oficializar como Croído por ser a típica vacilación do galego das vogais o/u (outro exemplo: Curuxido, Cruxido, pero oficialízase como Coruxido). Por min perfecto que se deixe Cruído, pero non é o oficial. Podes poñer na etiqueta o nome alternativo usando alt_name=Croído. Sobre o do Rodullo, pídoche que me confirmes se se di así, porque podo enviar un informe á Comisión de Toponimia para corrixir o nome. Saúde.
cabanudo (2022-01-12 13:06:20+00:00): Ola, encantado de atoparche, por suposto quero colaborar contigo en solventar estes erros. Son oriundo da zona, e podo asegurarche que así é o nome correcto. En canto á corrección de hoxe de Bocadroña por Boca de Oroña, claramente alguén apuntou ese nome mal nalgures, vexo que mapas.xunta.gal está tamén así. Gustaríame tratar de correxir algunhas incorreccións na miña zona. Polo que estarei completamente interesado en correxir a fonte destes erros.

Déixoche un enlace da propia web do concello de Lousame, onde podes ver que o nome é Cruído.

http://www.concellodelousame.gal/index.php/gl/conece-lousame/parroquias-e-aldeas
Monchinho (2022-01-12 16:37:38+00:00): Perfecto, compañeiro. Vou pasar informe de corrección á Comisión de Toponimia do nome do río Rodullo para que o fagan oficial. Tamén o farei con Bocadroña, que seguramente estea mal anotado como ben dis porque a transcrición fonética non se corresponde coa real, así que está mal recollido. O de Cruído/Croído si está ben recollido foneticamente, pero decidiron poñelo con o por algún motivo. Por min queda ben así, como se pronuncia, non vexo motivo para modificalo, así que queda como o deixaches ti niquelado. Calquera cousiña escríbeme, tesme aquí ou no Telegram do OSM Galicia.
Monchinho (2022-01-12 16:39:43+00:00): Sendo como es autóctono do lugar, por favor, confírmame se o o da sílaba "dro" de Bocadroña é aberto ou pechado, é dicir, se o o de "dro" soa coma o o de "bola" de pan ou coma o o de "bóla" de xogar á pelota.
marc__marc (2022-10-10 15:46:04+00:00): Hello,
what's the meaning of no_name 	Tasty Corner ? reading the historiy, it's seems better to use old_name=Tasty Corner or was:name=Tasty Corner no ?
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2022-10-10 15:46:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2700347866
marc__marc (2022-10-10 15:48:34+00:00): and same issue with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/872455168 HSBC
Thingummy (2022-10-11 00:44:14+00:00): Hi Marc. I have no idea how I got "no name" in my head probably got confused with "not:name" but that's meaningless too. Have changed them now. Cheers Paul
GinaroZ (2022-01-11 18:14:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. You've marked the whole of Seggie Drive as open - is that correct or is the bit in the middle still under construction?
lyctkel (2022-06-11 06:48:32+00:00): Hi b*k*,
handelt es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020255913 um einen Vertipper und ist statt building=z vielleicht building=yes gemeint?
Herzliche Grüsse,
lyctkel
user_70413 (2022-06-11 07:17:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Da hat sich die Tastatur wohl auf englisch umgestellt ohne dass ich es mitbekommen habe!
eggie (2022-01-12 10:03:17+00:00): Merged info with addressnode.. gr eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:19:57+00:00): Hi eggie!  Thanks for your corrections to the address node. Your helpful feedback will help me in my future work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116020648
eggie (2022-01-11 12:07:41+00:00): Hi Daniil  Please you the present addressnode to tag on.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-01-11 12:09:28+00:00): Merged info
Daniil_E (2022-01-12 21:10:17+00:00): Hello eggie,

Thank you for the feedback and fix. I will take it into consideration in further work.

Best regards,
Daniil.
eggie (2022-01-12 10:01:55+00:00): merged info with addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:11:47+00:00): Hi eggie! Thanks for your corrections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116020764
eggie (2022-01-12 09:59:18+00:00): Merged info with addressnode Greetz,
eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:12:12+00:00): Hi eggie! Thanks for your corrections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116020923
eggie (2022-01-11 12:11:20+00:00): Hi Please use the present addressnode to tag on.
car;car_repair will not show a symbol. 
Better to use only car. 
Gr eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:15:39+00:00): Hi eggie! Thanks for your corrections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116020939
yadathot (2022-01-11 11:53:45+00:00): Added delivery access restriction on gate as per Driver feedback.
frydzio (2022-01-11 12:41:41+00:00): Parking powinien być oznaczony jako amenity=parking. parking_space oznacza pojedyncze miejsce parkingowe
cranik (2022-01-11 12:53:22+00:00): thanks!
eggie (2022-01-12 10:00:22+00:00): Two poi's?   One will do?

gr eggie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-13 06:18:06+00:00): Of course, eggie!  Thanks for your corrections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116021954
user_6110846 (2022-01-17 15:59:39+00:00): ШО ТИ КУРИШ 
ЯКШО БУДІВЛЯ ЗНАХОДИТЬСЯ У ЗВЯЗКУ ASSOCIATEDSTREET ЯК ЧЛЕН HOUSE ТО ADDR;STREET НЕ ВИКОРИСТОВУЄТЬСЯ 

НА територіі Малин я роблю скасування 
і перед тим як лізти у Малин читай  правилам і домовленості української спільноти
user_6110846 (2022-01-17 16:09:04+00:00): Навішо ти стираєш магазини 

якшо вони не працюють то їх стирати не можна 
тоді shop =convenience замінюється на disused:shop=convenience
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2022-01-11 13:54:26+00:00): Hi..

Op zich oke, maar dan kun je de verouderde taggingregel cycleway=opposite verwijderen.
Check wel of oneway:moped=no en oneway:mofa=no hier ook van toepassing is.
Je edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116023167#map=16/52.2197/5.1535

MVG
eggie
Koekebiker (2022-01-13 07:41:06+00:00): Hoi, 
Dank weer voor je feedback! Ik had vergeleken met een paar andere eenrichtingsstraten verderop, en daar stond al wel bicycle:oneway=no maar die cycleway=opposite was me niet opgevallen :(  (ook niet gezien dat daar moped=no en mofa=no stond, zal voortaan beter opletten/verdiepen)

Ik was hiermee begonnen omdat er een paar straten echt nog niet goed stonden (een navigatieapp liet me daar niet "tegen de richting in" fietsen) en zodoende was ik gaan vergelijken.

Vraag me nu wel af of bij cycleway=opposite ook de brom- en snorfietsen in 2 richtingen mogen rijden? Of is dat de reden dat dit eigenlijk een verouderde tag is? Vond zonet namelijk de volgende thread:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65612

Ik concludeer hieruit dat cycleway=opposite dus eigenlijk vervangen zou moeten worden door dedicated aanduidingen voor (brom-/snor-/)fietsers

Bedankt weer!
Groeten Bart
eggie (2022-01-13 07:48:31+00:00): Dat laatste klopt...   Wat je zoal tegenkomt kun je vervangen, maar het lastige is dat je dan ook moet weten of het voor bromfietsers geldt. Het dilemma. 
Bij twijfel laat ik dan cycleway=opposite staan.
Maar als lokale mapper zul je het ongetwijfeld weten. 
Mapse
eggie
Patr1k_P (2022-01-13 17:07:04+00:00): ahoj, znacenie shop=yes sa moc nedoporucuje, navyse predajnu ani nevykresli na mape, nema to ziadnu ikonku, lebo nie je specifikovany obchod
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dyes
ma-rt-in (2022-01-14 18:16:13+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du hier eine doppelte POI erstellt/bearbeitet?

vg
A67-A67 (2022-01-11 22:19:00+00:00): Hello,

In the Netherlands we add companies to the existing address nodes, not to the building.

I've corrected it here.
NastiaP1 (2022-01-12 14:34:41+00:00): Hello! 

Thank you for your feedback and correction. It was very helpful
Buraddo (2022-01-11 16:06:55+00:00): Reverted in changeset 116030304
jeslop (2022-01-11 15:18:57+00:00): Hola mgim, bienvenido a OSM.

Como primera edición, has marcado como lugar de culto un punto en el que no parece existir actualmente ninguna edificación. Del mismo modo no especificas a que religión pertenece dicho lugar de culto.

Como etiqueta de nombre añades Wingskate, una modalidad deportiva.

Te revierto el cambio. Si deseas contribuir a OSM, te recomiendo que empieces por aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

También puedes conectar con la comunidad española en: 
talk-es: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/ 
foro: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=83  
Telegram: https://t.me/OSMes

Un saludo, y gracias por unirte a la comunidad.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Buraddo (2022-01-11 16:06:05+00:00): Reverted in changeset 116030288
sander79 (2022-01-12 09:09:58+00:00): de 'source=3dShapes' kan je van de playground weghalen, die is niet meer relevant
PTT (2022-01-12 10:20:57+00:00): bedankt voor de opmerking, de geometrie komt nog wel uit 3dShapes, maar als het gebruikelijk is om de tag weg te halen bij elke edit dat doe ik dat voortaan, klinkt niet onlogisch.
eggie (2022-01-11 15:28:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
McMoor (2022-01-11 15:56:36+00:00): Ik heb het gezien, zal deze doornemen
G1asshouse (2022-01-14 12:03:29+00:00): [For Changeset: 116027622 as well]
Could you provide the source for these changesets? I do not understand how you determined the values for Key:smoothness.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google The following two ways show cracks greater than 1.5cm making them "intermediate" or at most "good". They do not appear to be "excellent".
For ways: 458124851 and 932523728 you changed junction=circular to roundabout. 9 months ago, a local mapper [seen here Changeset: 103211874] explains why they changed those ways from "roundabout" to "circular". How did you remotely determine that mapper was incorrect?
For junction=circular, oneway=yes is implied. You can remove the redundant "oneway=yes" key and help fight tag bloat in the database.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
I suspect there are more introduced errors in these two changesets. To be prudent and for the sake of the OSM's data accuracy, it might be safest to revert these (and any other similar) changesets and revisit them in a more cautious and conservative manner.
Jerome1010 (2023-01-20 05:17:42+00:00): I did the edit on changeset 103211874.  These nodes are a bit unique in that I do not believe they are roundabouts despite looking a bit like roundabouts.  They are not marked with the yellow roundabout approach signposts (see for example street view of 4th St and Kathleen in Coeur d'Alene) and they are not marked with any yield/give-way signposts either, as you would see at true roundabouts.   

My belief here is that these are 1) traffic calming devices and 2) enable easy turn-around when the area between the nodes is closed to vehicles from Memorial Day to Labor Day.

I marked these as circulars because I do not consider them roundabouts.  I am not 100% certain circular is correct either.

When the area between nodes is closed from Memorial Day to Labor Day, these nodes I think would be considered Turning Loops ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop )

But the remainder of the year when the street is open, then these act more to slow traffic.

Now that I've gotten more experience with OSM, I think this should probably be tagged as a "traffic island" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland )

But even that is a bit difficult because when the road is open 9 months a year and this is a traffic island, if a driver WANTS to drive circles around the traffic island, they could do that and treat it as the turning loop, even though the road is open.

Good discussion here.  If it were me, because the road is open 9 months of the year and this serves more as a traffic island, I think I would tag it that way.  I made a tag on the road that closes in summertime that it is seasonal.  If there is a way to have a "seasonal traffic island" and a "seasonal turning loop" then I suppose that might be the best?
EdLoach (2022-01-11 17:16:48+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. As a temporary measure I've converted the point feature you added into a building based on the Maxar imagery background (which is not as sharp as say Bing imagery, but is a little more up to date). I believe this is the new nursery school, but do you know whether it is part of St Clare's or whether it has its own name? Any questions about anything let me know and I'll see if I can help. Best wishes, Ed
EdLoach (2022-01-11 17:22:18+00:00): I found this, so will add a name for it. https://www.st-clares.essex.sch.uk/st-clares-nursery/