piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToeBee (2017-11-03 14:51:24+00:00): This is not a Hard Rock Cafe location.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-07 13:44:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077506821 - gdzie jest ten sklep w rzeczywistości? Bo raczej nie na chodniku
SomeoneElse (2017-11-01 19:59:50+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for tidying these up!
Cheers,
Andy
Cascafico (2017-11-01 20:28:40+00:00): Non c'è una highway vicina con name=località Aurisina Cave, per cui toglierei addr:street a favore di addr:place già presente.
Palolo (2023-03-06 16:46:23+00:00): Do you have a more accurate location for this church please? There doesn't appear to be a building at this location. Thanks
GerdP (2017-11-03 06:06:27+00:00): Hi!
I've changed a way with highway=bridge, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53469167
OffTheChart (2017-11-02 10:34:47+00:00): I see you've been removing names from my hard work identifying all the types of WW2 Bunkers on Jersey. Can I ask why? From previous discussion it seems you're heavily focussed on getting the database "correct", but this is spoiling the usefullness of the standard website map. I have been trying to make the normal map informative for 99% of users, but if you remove the bunker types from how I've named them, this data will not be seen by the majority of users. What are we trying to achieve here? Users don't browse the database, they look at the map!!!
OffTheChart (2017-11-02 11:26:04+00:00): Partial apologies, if you've only touched the ones named "bunker", as you've undone less of my work than I initially thought. But I still maintain that explorers using the map would be interested to see that the unspecified bunkers are indeed bunkers, as there's no other indication on the website map.
Mike Baggaley (2017-11-02 16:32:37+00:00): Hi, moving the bunker information from the name field to the specific tag seemed to be improving the level of information, not 'undoing your work'. However, I did not realise that the standard OSM  map doesn't render military=bunker. Ideally we should get this functionality added to the standard renderer, but as a pragmatic measure it might be better to include both the name and the military tagging on bunkers at present. I think there are 10 bunkers I have retagged. There is quite a detailed tagging scheme for bunkers, gun emplacements and the like and it seems odd  that so much trouble should have been gone to to enable capture of such information without any consideration about how it should be displayed.
OffTheChart (2017-11-02 18:06:42+00:00): Thanks for your reply. If we can just leave things as they are for now, please, as that seems easier and best all around! Cheers
Lee Carré (2021-07-31 02:12:14+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
tyr_asd (2017-11-02 08:35:07+00:00): Hallo Älgen,

ich nehme an die Meldung http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1191913 stammt von dir?

Der von dir beanstandete Weg war in OpenStreetMap als nicht öffentlich zugänglicher Steig eingezeichnet (siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531986130/history).

Falls hier tatsächlich eine Wegverbindung besteht, kann eine solche Information unter Umständen nützlich werden, wenn z.B. Einsatzkräfte wie die Bergrettung vermisste Personen suchen. Deshalb würde ich in dem Fall gerne deine Löschung wieder rückgängig machen.

Gruß,
Martin
Älgen (2017-11-02 13:39:29+00:00): bitte um angabe deiner e-mail adresse an
meine e-mail, damit ich dir diesbezügliche stellungnahme und unterlagen
schicken kann,dankje
tyr_asd (2017-11-02 15:04:07+00:00): Du kannst mich unter tyr.asd@gmail.com erreichen.
RicoElectrico (2017-11-01 21:48:50+00:00): Hej, dzięki za uzupełnienie nowych nazw ulic i szacunek za użycie JOSM-a :)

Trzeba jeszcze zaktualizować adresację. Pewnie jest lub będzie w gminnej ewidencji na stronie. Poproszę o import naszych speców od tego.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=670804#p670804
4004 (2021-02-15 01:15:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178317229/history там проезд или пешеходное все же? еще и название откуда то
Kevin Kofler (2017-11-05 06:24:33+00:00): Die Wiener Linien verwenden aber in allen ihren Dokumenten und auf den Stationsschildern (sofern sie nicht in Blockbuchstaben sind) nach wie vor die Schreibweisen mit 'ß'. Daher halte ich die Änderungen an den Haltestellennamen für schlicht falsch.

But the Wiener Linien themselves still use the spelling with 'ß' in all their documents and even on the signs on the stations or stops themselves (unless they are in all caps). Therefore, I consider the edits to the stop names to be just plain incorrect.
Kevin Kofler (2017-11-05 06:35:14+00:00): See e.g. http://www.wienerlinien.at/itip/ – just look for the stops you edited, they all use the original spelling, not the one you changed it to.
gnlpfth (2017-11-09 14:41:46+00:00): Da der Name sich tatsächlich ohne wenn und aber nach der Stationsbeschriftung richtet, habe ich diese Bearbeitung zurückgesetzt. Das gleiche gilt für die Stationen Nußdorf, Nußdorfer Straße und übrigens auch für die Station Hardeggasse, die du jetzt noch nicht angetastet hast.
Gruß, FM
RoterEmil (2017-11-02 21:21:22+00:00): Hallo, die Hausnummer ist bereits bei OSM eingetragen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1686131361) - und  zwar am richtigen Standort. Ich habe Deinen Eintrag hier deshalb gelöscht. Bitte prüfe genau, was Du einträgst und wo, damit die Datenqualität von OSM erhalten bleibt. Danke und schöne Grüße :)
JanWandelaar (2017-11-05 08:43:24+00:00): The house near Castenray (Castenrayseweg) was removed according to the BAG. Did you see the house or use the PDOK luchtfoto?
PS. The comment is about Kenya, the changes are in gemeente Venray.
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 20:42:57+00:00): Chuquisaca tiene 5 poblaciones distintas con nombre comun de KOLLPA, (1 Kollpa y 4 Kollpa Pampa) esta es Collpa con C y no aparece en el INE como equivalente a Kollpa con K; tienes algun registro q muestre que Kollpa con K es equivalente a Collpa con K? para poderlo usar como nombre alternativo?
Gracias
eggie (2017-11-01 22:19:30+00:00): je edit is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Het begint aan de oostzijde niet op de hoofdrijbaan maar ergens halverwege die fietsoversteek. Ik kijk even. Wellicht heb je wat aan onze tips in de welkomstmail.

Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-01 22:21:56+00:00): node fietspad  aan juiste weg verbonden.
breugel01 (2025-06-18 19:09:53+00:00): Hartelijk dank. Ik begrijp wel dat het invoeren van nieuwe gegevens niet eenvoudig is. Er loopt nog eenzelfde nieuw pad met brug vanaf de bocht in de Hellebaard naar het voet-en fietspad in het park. Misschien dat ik die er morgen in probeer te zetten. Maar u mag het ook doen... Mijn dank.
eggie (2025-06-18 19:17:44+00:00): Dag breugel,

Vooral in het begin is alles lastig.. zeker om zo'n editor onder de knie te krijgen. 
Probeer het eerst zelf.. Al doende leert men. Wanneer iets verkeerd gaat is dat geen ramp. 
Dan vinkje het hokje aan met review request en dan check ik het wel even.
Iedereen was ooit beginner. 

Succes,
eggie
Chris Fleming (2017-11-01 23:54:46+00:00): Looks good - I don't recommend deleting the name node at the moment as the Standard OSM style only renders the name from the name. So fo now we have both.
juhanjuku (2017-11-04 20:34:57+00:00): Why such name? Is this a restaurant or second hand shop?
HubMiner (2017-11-02 17:57:33+00:00): Hi, you might want to copy/paste the changeset description (those are looked at only under special circumstances) to "description" of the building.  I would also add building=school.  Let me know if you need help with anything else.
JJIglesias (2017-11-03 05:49:54+00:00): Carapari NO es de nombre alternativo Pilaya; Pilaya es otra poblacion de Chuquisaca; cada una tiene su identificador propio
Aleks-Berlin (2017-11-02 14:20:35+00:00): Hi djimpa, please read the OSM wiki (wikipedia=lang:Article, not "http.."). 
Details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia 
Thanks, Alex
Reclus (2017-11-02 16:36:44+00:00): Der Helenenturm war völlig korrekt und vollständig als Way seit Jahren eingetragen. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was das sollte, dass djimpa an zwei Punkten unsinnige Werte eingetragen hat. (Z.B. auch die Turmhöhe (die schon korrekt am Way stand) nochmal falsch als ele und mit der Einheit "Meter".)

Der andere Edit von djimpa war auch Murks. Da wurden ebenfalls falsche Werte an schon seit Jahren korrekt eingetragenen Objekten ergänzt.

@djimpa Bitte lass so etwas! Witten eignet sich auch denkbar schlecht für Einsteiger, da hier die Datendichte und die Datenqualität schon sehr hoch sind. Es gibt für Anfänger schlicht kaum etwas einzutragen. Aber man kann sehr leicht etwas kaputtmachen. Also bitte woanders üben. Empfehlung: https://www.hotosm.org/
HubMiner (2017-11-02 18:41:14+00:00): What's the request?
TomM1495 (2017-11-02 19:36:55+00:00):    I moved the administrative borders based on what I knew about the area, as my Dad lives there. I was wondering if there is an official source for city borders, to better improve their location?

Thanks.
HubMiner (2017-11-02 20:03:25+00:00): You need someone with local knowledge.  I would add a map note, what that specific question.
PT-53 (2020-10-09 08:00:18+00:00): Hallo bergfrei,
war das fixme an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537515206/history
ein Versehen oder hat sich das zwischenzeitlich erledigt, oder ?
Grüße
74523978 (2017-11-02 22:10:11+00:00): Je hebt nog vergeten de winkel om te taggen en de fietsenstalling ook.
74523978 (2017-11-02 22:10:24+00:00): winkels
74523978 (2017-11-02 22:12:08+00:00): Oh ja ik heb ook nog paden toegevoegd binnen in het station, niet vergeten die ook even om te taggen ;)
user_3022894 (2017-11-02 20:21:49+00:00): Hallo User/-in Katerpfad, ich wollte dich nur darauf hinweisen, dass du access=no auf Wegen wie diesem hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500543575) nicht zu benutzen brauchst. access=no ist eigentlich nur für Wege gedacht, die für wirklich alle Verkehrsteilnehmer gesperrt sind. Bei allen anderen Wegen, die Pfade oder breitere Feldwege sind, reicht es, die zugelassenen Verkehrsmittel mit einem "yes" anzugeben (wie du es ja auch gemacht hast) und, falls zutreffend, motor_vehicle=no einzutragen. access=no ist nicht dazu da, um "alle nicht explizit angegebenen" Verkehrsmittel "auszusperren". Auch wenn es bei iD manchmal verlockend danach aussieht... Viele Grüße, Lukas
Katerpfad (2017-11-03 00:11:52+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Ich befürchte, ich habe das in ein paar anderen Fällen dann auch falsch gemacht und werde es überprüfen und ggfls wieder ändern.
user_3022894 (2017-11-03 11:16:17+00:00): Kein Problem und danke ebenfalls :)
tonyf1 (2017-11-01 23:15:36+00:00): Hi. Thanks for mapping a highway rest area at Katherine Gorge Airport. Can you please describe this feature. Judging from the satellite image 'A rest area is place along a road, usually a motorway or dual-carriageway, where a driver can stop to have a rest. ' may not be the most accurate match.
aharvey (2019-08-17 02:06:36+00:00): It looks like you've tagged Emporis.com as a source, could you specify what data was used, and can you point to the licensing etc which backs up why we're able to use this in OSM?
John Bek (2019-08-18 07:01:42+00:00): This is strange, as I don't recall tagging Customs House with Emporis.com. I can't even imagine why it would need to be tagged with that site, in terms of data. I'm guessing the tag ought to be removed
Владимир К (2017-11-02 10:20:37+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Спасибо за ваш вклад в OSM!
В будущем, старайтесь не использовать категории в названии, как в этом случае - Родник. В названии стоит указывать только имена собственные. Что это родник, ясно из типа объекта.
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
user_5359 (2017-11-02 18:42:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your extensive work. But notice for a building don’t use landuse=residential use building=yes instead.

I have modified your both change sets.

If you need help: You are welcome.
aceman444 (2020-10-31 18:25:45+00:00): Hi, why did you add the access=yes tag to the lift gate? Are you sure everybody and any vehicle can pass there? Why would then be the lift gate there? What exact traffic sign is at the place? You only quote  "Bing imagery" as your source, but the whole gate can't be seen there, much less the traffic sign/other access restriction. So please provide your sources properly. Thanks.
boldtrn (2020-11-02 09:15:27+00:00): Thanks for your comment. This change was done 3 years ago. I don't remember the details after this time. You are right, I should have added information about the source. Most likely the changes was made due to user feedback that this road is accessible by any vehicle. 

If you know this lift gate and know that the access properties are incorrect, please go ahead and fix the data.

> Why would then be the lift gate there?

There are many lift gates that are usually open and accessible and only closed under certain conditions. For example in the alps there are many lift gates that are closed when there is too much snow on a road or if there is flooding, etc.

Other lift gates are closed on certain days or times, which can be mapped with conditional restrictions.
aceman444 (2020-11-02 09:47:56+00:00): Thank you, I have a suspicion that road isn't accessible to general public, but I do not know the exact traffic signs. That's why I asked. The author that added the lift gate didn't add any access restriction tags, which means the gate isn't passable to vehicles, which you have overriden.
aharvey (2018-01-12 04:56:19+00:00): is this building underground? could we add a tag for that? as from the outside there is no building visible here.
John Bek (2018-01-12 05:32:48+00:00): As the shown area is so large, I'm not sure which building you're referring to
aharvey (2018-01-12 07:28:44+00:00): Sorry i meant http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409035048. There is a pedestrian place intersecting your building so wondering if the building is underground. Thanks
John Bek (2018-01-12 22:17:53+00:00): Not sure why the building boundary was like that as the museum isn't that big. The boundary has been reset, as has the pedestrian area. Thanks
aharvey (2018-01-13 02:48:10+00:00): Thanks that looks much better based on what I saw from walking past. I just merged the duplicate nodes onto the building.
Юхнов (2020-05-12 16:45:12+00:00): Он же уже расчищен и закрыт, не?
DaveF (2017-11-01 22:31:44+00:00): To check, is this a genuine synagogue? It's located in a residential house & appears to be named after you.
JJIglesias (2017-11-02 06:15:50+00:00): Hay que tener cuidado al crear NUEVAS problaciones primero hay q revisar en los alrededores. La Poblacion de ITY ya existia, cerca de donde creaste otra poblacion. Hemos eliminado el duplicado mas reciente
JJIglesias (2017-11-02 06:21:04+00:00): Aguayrenda y Aguairenda, son equivalentes; el nombre oficial INE/IGM es Aguayrenda.
Ancaguazu y Ankaguazu, son equivalentes; el nombre oficial INE/IGM es Ancaguazu

La Poblacion de ITY que creaste YA EXISTIA, hemos borrado la que creaste, para evitar duplicados
MapGardener (2017-11-02 18:14:06+00:00): Hi Yktan Eszett!

First of all welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, I think Ober St. Veit and Unter St. Veit is better spelled without hyphens ('-'). AFAIK, there is a policy in OpenStreetMap that thinks are usually spelled as seen on the ground (e.g. [1]). Especially if there is a general rule on how to spell street names and a street is signposted in a different way, the spelling on the streetsigns should be applied. Have you seen some signs or something similar spelled with hyphens? As far as I remember all labels on the underground stations are spelled with spaces and in a Book on Hietzing, the names were also spelled with spaces.
If you do not have any strong indicators that the spelling with hyphens is actually used on the ground, please revert your changes regarding Unter St. Veit and Ober St. Veit. Thank you very much in advance!
If you have issues with reverting your changes or if you have any questions regarding OpenStreetMap, don't hesitate in dropping a line.

Best regards
Michael


[1]  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
Kevin Kofler (2017-11-09 20:41:05+00:00): Even the official map of the city of Vienna: https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtplan/ still uses the spelling with spaces, and also the ones with 'ß' that you changed. I think all these changes should be reverted, unless you actually see the changed spellings on relevant street signs, public transport stop names, etc. (And especially the name= tag on the public transport stop name should match how the stop is actually spelled on the signs, in the schedules, etc.)
MapGardener (2017-12-03 10:50:03+00:00): Hi Yktan Eszett!

I just  saw that you reverted most of your edits regarding the hyphens in Unter St. Veit and Ober St. Veit. Thank you very much for that!
Currently, the place=suburb node names are still written with hyphens. Is this intentional or were these nodes just not properly reverted?

Best regards,
Michael
Yktan Eszett (2017-12-03 19:49:24+00:00): Hi Michael and a late thanks for your warm welcome!

First of all, I am sorry for any inconveniences caused by my edits. I've indeed been quite incautious in the selection of nodes during my orthographical delirium, won't happen again!

Regarding the remaining nodes: My decisive source concerning the spelling of Viennese suburbs and streets in general is the "Wiener Nomenklaturkommission", updated in 1999 after the enactment of the German language reform. (https://www.wien.gv.at/kultur/archiv/nomenklaturkommission.html)

In the section titled "Sonstige geografische Namen", Unter-St.-Veit is even listed as an example for this specific spelling rule, which led to my edit on the place=suburb node. As you've already realized, the spelling of both suburbs is and has been very ambiguous ever since. Local businesses and organizations rarely use the spelling with hyphens for the sake of design - which is totally valid and common elsewhere. According to Wiener Linien, even the underground stations are merely spelled this way on paper "as a provision made to safeguard existing standards", which sounds quite contrary to me. Upon further research I found out that the German language even invented a word for spaces mistakenly used for compound words: "Deppenleerzeichen" or - more sarcastically - "Deppen Leer Zeichen".

As for OSM conventions, I wouldn't know which one to adduce first. That "[you] should be aware that street signs may contain errors" sounds very logical in my view, but Ober- or Unter-St.-Veit is never referenced on any street sign (besides "Sankt-Veit-Gasse", which ironically uses hyphens to fulfill its role as composite noun). Additionally, street signs using an old spelling variant (like Nussgasse, formerly Nußgasse) don't have to be replaced immediately, only when affixing new ones. This led to my conclusion of prioritizing an official nomenclature. On an unrelated note which is not a concern of mine: Isn't the "don't use abbreviations" rule broken here? Shouldn't it be "Ober-Sankt-Veit"?

I'd love to hear your opinion on this stance, e. g. whether or not to index the "different kinds" of spellings in tags (alt_name?).

Kind regards,
Yktan
MapGardener (2017-12-06 20:38:55+00:00): Hi Yktan,
 
no problem, to be honest, I havn't put too many toughs into the orography of street names and I'm always glad to learn something new. Thank you for your patient explanations!
I did a quick search and I was not able to find any official list of suburb names except the document you posted. Nevertheless, any source I found (e.g. [2]), including a book on Hietzing [1] uses the version with spaces. Since the document from Nomenklaturkommission is the most official source I see, keeping the suburb names with hyphens is probably the best option. (If someone else finds other reasons why to use spaces, we may have to repeat the discussion.) I also think that using the alt_name for the other version is an excellent idea. On using that tag, people will hopefully still be able to find the suburbs, even if they use the version with spaces. I'll soon add the additional tag.
According to the "don't use abbreviations" rule [3], the names should be indeed spelled with "Sankt", but I think that would even add more confusion. Especially, given that the official name abbreviates it and the abbreviation is not yet implemented in OpenStreetMap.
 
Kind regards,
Michael
 
[1] "Wien 13. Bezirk, Hietzing in alten Fotografien", Carola Leitner and Kurt Hamtil, Ueberreuter, 2006
[2] http://www.hietzing.at/Bezirk/bezirk_liste.php?tags=Ober_St_dot__Veit&menu=3
[3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
Kevin Kofler (2017-12-07 01:04:34+00:00): For the "Sankt" issue, the consensus on the talk-at mailing list was actually to use "Sankt" if the official name says "Sankt" and to use "St." if the official name says "St.". In this case, the official name for the suburbs is given by the City of Vienna, the official name for the public transport stops is given by the city-owned public transport company Wiener Linien. Both use "St.", so that spelling should also be followed here.
woodpeck (2017-11-01 22:42:48+00:00): Comment cock-up. Should have been: "remove advertising (spammy description)".
Stereo (2017-12-06 02:45:23+00:00): Hallo doktorpixel14! Darf ich fragen, was deine Quelle für das CEPS ist? Viele Grüße und frohes mappen.
Karthoo (2017-12-06 12:53:17+00:00): In diesem Changeset hab ich eigentlich nur die Nummern der Stationen vom Luftbild abgelesen. Ansonsten hab ich die Abschnitte über die Pfosten an der Oberfläche vor Ort erfasst.
Lacihu (2017-12-27 20:05:52+00:00): Üdv, Lébényben a 
Földes köz semmiképpen nem minősül rendes lakóútnak, inkább track-nek mondanám, vagyis földútnak, amin traktorok közlekednek zömében.
hujberg (2017-12-27 21:16:32+00:00): Szia. Igazad van, javítottam. géza
MapGardener (2017-11-02 18:16:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53436834 for a discussion on that topic.
geoaria (2017-11-27 09:00:09+00:00): سلام
دوست عزیز این ادیت شما در شمال اصفهان مربوط به 25 روز قبل می باشد و همچنان به توصیه های ما عمل نمی کنید . در زمان ترسیم میادین می بایست دقت کنید میدان را جدا از مسیر ها بکشید . دو سر خط میدان هم را قطع می کنندو سپس به آن درجه راه و تگ میدان داده می شود. در ترسیم میدان های دایره و بیضی هم دقت کنید که بی نظم و زشت نباشد در id با انتخاب کلید o به طور خودکار به دایره تبدیل می شود. در صورتی که میدان مستطیل است با انتخاب کلید s به صورت چهارگوش منظم در بیاورید.
باز هم می گویم این روش ترسیم هیچ کمکی به تکمیل نقشه نمی کند بلکه باعث مشکلات عدیده در مسیریابی و راننده استفاده کننده از آن می شود.
ساده بگویم اگر از کار ترسیم نقشه دست بردارید کمک شایانی به دوستان نقشه کش کرده اید.
اصلاح ادیت های شما بسیار وقت گیر است
geoaria (2017-11-27 09:04:30+00:00): Hi, the method of plotting the map by you is false and causing vandalism in Iran map. Please stop.
Please just add the places to the map and stop drawing the paths.
MapGardener (2017-11-02 18:17:47+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53436834 for a discussion on that topic.
trial (2020-11-08 19:27:37+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que vous avez (ou tu, comme tu préfères) mis fee=no je suppose vu l'hitorique que ça fait références aux toilettes (que vous avez supprimées) et qui sont de mémoire dans le bâtiment de gauche (à moins que celles du port les aient remplacées).
Autre amélioration suggérée : ne pas mettre d'adresse car le numéro 53 existe déjà sur la carte. De même le code postal et le nom de la communes sont retrouvés par la position (c'est à Roscanvel qui a le même code postal que Camaret : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/296204). Éventuellement pour l'adresse vous pouvez conserver mais en remplaçant addr: par contact: : en France on ne doit pas avoir de doublons d'adresse.
geoaria (2017-11-27 09:03:55+00:00): Hi, the method of plotting the map by you is false and causing vandalism in Iran map. Please stop.
Please just add the places to the map and stop drawing the paths.