piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RicoElectrico (2020-07-25 01:22:21+00:00): Cześć,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7745121779/history

Powinno tam być fire_hydrant:position=green .

Przeczytaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fire_hydrant

Poprawiam to (oraz inne takie, jeśli są).

W razie pytań śmiało pisz tutaj albo na polskim forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
RicoElectrico (2020-07-25 01:23:38+00:00): Tu lepszy opis: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
RicoElectrico (2020-07-25 01:25:23+00:00): Poprawiony ten i kilka innych :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88481056
mueschel (2020-07-25 09:21:37+00:00): Could you explain why you added 49 images to this very mundane POI? Was this a software error?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-07-25 09:35:19+00:00): Yes, it is a software error. Will clean it up later on and fix this bug.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-25 16:36:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88500502 where the changeset comment is: Reverting sock-puppet of spigo_de_ajo reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3808. Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88495808 ..
solenoid jam (2020-07-24 19:47:27+00:00): Вообще не уверен что стало лучше, может стоит и откатить
Frans S (2020-07-25 16:28:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please don't change the tag building=yes
into building=house.
We ought to map all buildings as building=yes because from a satellite image we can not see the purpose of a building. So General standard for mapping HOTOSM is building=yes.
Please map also more accurate. You map buildings rather rough without paying attention to extensions and rooflines.
I invalidate this task. Please correct your mappings according to their outlines

Best regards
ovruni (2020-07-24 20:25:13+00:00): Hola
He notado que ha agregado un colegio en un área en la que no se puede divisar que exista desde ninguna de las imágenes que posee OpenStreetMap, entre ellas la imagen de Bing que usted indica en su conjunto de cambios 88475064 [0]. Por otra parte cuando usted menciona el termino  "google map", este no es una fuente oficial, como lo es el MINEDU (Ministerio de educación) y cuando menciona "debe ser", está evidenciando de que no está seguro de su existencia y solamente se ha basado en google maps. Además he buscado en la base de datos del MINEDU y  no se referencia la existencia de este colegio en el área que permita la verificabilidad [2] en OpenStreetMap. Por último le dejo un enlace sobre las preguntas frecuentes de porque no utilizar el mapa de google maps. [3] Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88475064
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#.C2.BFY_por_qu.C3.A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos.3F
Glassman (2020-07-25 02:22:20+00:00): TIP: We don't have test edits. Your work goes live once you upload the edit. 

TIP: Instead of landuse, use building=house. Landuse is usually larger tracks of land, like a housing development.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88476506
Allroads (2020-07-26 22:01:24+00:00): Kijk ik dan in JOSM editor met layer DKK kadastrale kaart, voor OSM te gebruiken, is het perceel heel anders. Slecht ingetekend.
En wordt het niet meer door een boer gebruikt, private wonen, dus landuse=residential
Heeft niks met farmyard van doen, beschrijft niet de huidige situatie. Belangrijk! Nu dus foutieve informatie. Al zouden deze bewoners een bord op hun huis hangen met een andere naam of bewust niet. Zij hebben de keuze om dat te doen, daar kijken we naar. Name op erf of gebouw. Hooguit, historisch een old_name= wat niet op die ene kaart komt. Er is altijd de mogelijkheid om eigen kaarten te maken op basis van old_name=
Je moet dus alles bij af langs of het nu nog zo is.

Dat is de werkwijze voor OSM.
jtracey (2020-07-26 16:12:10+00:00): A couple things:
 - You should pretty much never have a multipolygon with one member. If it can be represented as a single way, then the tags should be on that (i.e., the normal case for mapping objects).
 - What you have mapped as grassland I think is actually unmaintained brownfield? It's not owned by the city or part of the park, unless it's changed since I was last there.
 - The park was a multipolygon because it is in fact two disjoint areas, with two different posted addresses and everything. Unless that "grassland" is indeed part of the park now, but even then, you have to cross the Ion tracks and Old Albert Street to get to the trails on the other half.

Generally, I would recommend avoiding making major changes like this without a ground survey first. Is the situation on the ground different now, or should we change this back?
thampton (2020-07-26 16:22:05+00:00): We should probably change this one back, although there is the path crossing the train tracks at Old Albert? I've been using the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry maps of wetlands and I should probably re-map the natural features wood/grassland but the park should go back the way it was.
Frans S (2020-07-25 09:25:17+00:00): Hello Bethany
Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are quite good.
Please pay more attention on the details of your mappings. See these pictures.
Follow more accurate the outlines of a building .
Please do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping .
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nfezrgj1vWr1H9by485qh1MW6TR-oIjB/view?usp=sharing

Best regards
FuseR (2020-07-24 22:30:44+00:00): Спасибо
SomeoneElse (2020-07-24 22:33:31+00:00): Also includes water from OSSV (and survey and Bing).
Frans S (2020-07-25 13:04:55+00:00): Hello Chrisimus> Thanks for mapping
Your mappings are not that accurate
Please open this task again and improve your mappings. There are also overlooked buildings to be mapped
Best regards
Glassman (2020-07-25 02:32:55+00:00): TIP: lake boundaries should match the imagery. I adjusted the lake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88478345
WoodWoseWulf (2020-07-26 08:04:09+00:00): Hi yayap18,
This is awfully small for a park... you hashtaggeds firehydrant here - is that possibly a more accurate description for what this is?
How we define parks on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
WoodWoseWulf (2020-07-26 08:21:32+00:00): Apologies for the multiple typos in the above comment. I just looked back at it and though... "bleh!"
Please let me know if I was completely incomprehensible.
Allroads (2020-07-26 22:08:42+00:00): Er is hier geen farmyard meer aanwezig, Dus huidige foutieve informatie.
Nakaner (2020-07-24 21:57:05+00:00): Die Begehung war am 18. Juli 2020, nicht 2019.

This changeset removes wrong modifications introduced by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86668158
pio2_122 (2020-08-20 15:33:37+00:00): Ogromna prośba: Proszę, popraw nazwę tych miejscowości (we wszystkich zmianach tego typu), aby w nazwie nie było "(nazwa zniesiona)" - tą informację można dodać w tagu note lub w ogóle usunąć te punkty, o ile nie są już używane przez mieszkańców.

Obecnie takie dziwaczne nazwy są wyświetlane na mapie...
syntex (2020-08-20 16:21:33+00:00): I tu jest właśnie ten problem - usuwać czy zostawić tylko w opisie informację o zniesieniu nazwy (zostały zniesione w sensie prawnym)
pio2_122 (2020-08-20 16:27:48+00:00): Jak wspomniałem wyżej:
jeśli jest potwierdzenie, że w terenie nazwy nie funkcjonują - usunąć;
jeśli nie można tego potwierdzić lub jeśli nazwy nadal funkcjonują lokalnie - zostawić, jednak zdegradować do place=locality, dodać tag note=* z opisem stanu prawnego i usunąć tagi source=PRNG, a także teryt:simc=* (aby nie wprowadzały w błąd)
syntex (2020-08-24 20:25:20+00:00): Ok, poprawiłem
RamblingRubbisher (2020-10-31 02:25:50+00:00): Why was this removed? 42.3524462, -71.0676617

The bin is still there?
Frans S (2020-07-25 11:30:58+00:00): Hello. A remark
Your mappings needs to be improved. You map not accurate and square.
Best regards
rab (2020-07-25 16:53:42+00:00): two parking cars:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829883592

another parking car:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829894083

recommendation: use more then one imagery layer
Marco F Martinez (2020-07-25 18:00:01+00:00): ok understood, ¿how i can keep working in the same sector to change my work?
Marco F Martinez (2020-07-25 18:21:06+00:00): just fixed that
Marco F Martinez (2020-07-25 18:21:36+00:00): i mean, i just fixed the issue with the parking cars
Frans S (2020-07-26 09:32:32+00:00): Hi Marco. Thanks for adjusting your work.
You can reopen a changeset by clicking on top of this page on de Edit button and select the editor,
I adjusted a few more buildings to show you how a good mapped building should be
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88514814
On the top side right you can see your original mapping, the squaring you did and my adjustment by following the outline. See the legend for more info
Success with further mapping
Frnas
TravGW (2020-07-26 20:11:29+00:00): There was a massive discussion about this very same thing a several months back. Can't remember what if any conclusion was reached. Anyway, the tags look good to me.
RicoElectrico (2020-07-25 01:19:10+00:00): Cześć, proszę o stosowanie lepszych opisów zmian: co i dlaczego zmienione. Zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Dzięki!

Poprawiłem też niestyk dwóch dróg oraz przyklejenie drogi do granicy administracyjnej - granice powinny dzielić węzły tylko z innymi granicami, a nie drogami itp.

Jeśli potrzebujesz pomocy śmiało pisz tutaj albo na polskim forum:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
angys (2022-02-19 18:10:06+00:00): Hello, can you help to adjust the alignment of AH150 Pan Bornero Highway from Serian to Lachau? The road is complete and can be trace via the latest MAXAR premium imagery
and also the area start from 2.28724,111.97182
RiverBearings (2022-02-22 01:25:22+00:00): Hello angys, 
Footyfootfella is no longer on the team. However when we return to this area in the near future we will look into the alignment edits you mentioned. 
Could you update the AH150 route relation members (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5288245) and any necessary way tags of those trunk way members before those alignments are made by chance? There are gaps near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033308766 and possibly other places.
Thanks - RiverBearings.
Frans S (2020-07-25 11:33:19+00:00): Hello Smidgley. 
Your mappings here are even that bad as on other changesets I reviewed
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2020-07-25 22:31:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
majkaz (2020-07-29 09:07:17+00:00): Prosím tě, ty přístřešky na popelnice jsou zmapované úplně blbě.
amenity=shelter znamená, že to je turistický přístřešek, což tohle rozhodně nebude.
Frans S (2020-07-25 11:29:10+00:00): Sorry to say, Even that bad mapped.
Take your time to map accurate and squared.
Frans S (2020-07-25 11:27:18+00:00): Hello Smidgley. You asked for a review.
See my comments on your mapping quality on other changesets. 
Even that bad mapped.
AgusQui (2020-07-27 04:09:38+00:00): Avenida Chivilcoy entre Beiro y Tinogasta es un tramo corto de poca importancia, por eso estaba como tertiary.
Recomiendo que leas la convención local: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n
Frans S (2020-07-28 11:31:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Just tag a building as building=yes.
That is common use when you map from an satellite image
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-28 11:37:28+00:00): Hi.
Are you making a joke by naming a road to you?
Best regards
Carnildo (2020-07-26 05:34:41+00:00): You added the address of "916 Toole Avenue" to two houses.  Was this a mistake?
Evilscaught (2020-07-26 06:36:26+00:00): That was a mistake.  Thank you for pointing that out. :)
aharvey (2020-07-25 05:54:30+00:00): That's okay, they are different things, one is the name of the wharf itself man_made=pier, the other is the name of the public transport stop amenity=ferry_terminal, so they can both co-exists like how you've mapped it.
GerdP (2025-10-22 07:49:02+00:00): Moin!
Diese Halteposition stimmt vermutlich nicht mehr: https://www.osm.org/node/5525449605
Das Wartehäuschen ist jetzt hier: https://www.osm.org/node/13249396185
hybridOL (2025-10-22 10:32:57+00:00): Das ist wohl richtig. Ich ändere das heute Abend, da ich dann auch einen großen Halt mit Linie daraus mache. Ist ja mit hohem Bord und voller taktiler Linie. Den stop_position ziehe ich dann nach, da muss ich auch schauen, ob es Änderungen an den Nedhaltepunkten und Verläufen gibt
hybridOL (2025-10-22 20:41:26+00:00): Fertig
kapazao (2020-07-25 10:10:05+00:00): Hello, did you read wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations) before doing those changes? it is more precise a point or an area that covers the entire station?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88480959
kapazao (2020-07-25 10:11:58+00:00): Please, give come references about the changes you are doing, we don't know where you got the info to make those changes. Regards.
andrepoiy (2020-07-25 01:59:07+00:00): incorrect place** my bad
Allison P (2021-04-17 01:34:22+00:00): A lot of these should probably be unclassified, not service.
AgusQui (2020-07-27 04:02:49+00:00): Monroe es muy ancha y de mucha importancia, para OSM es una avenida, aunque no sea oficial. Por otro lado al cambiar el nombre de una calle, tambien debes hacerlo en las direcciones, en todos los addr:street
stevea (2020-07-25 03:45:25+00:00): Thank you for making this fix.  I tire of correcting Fluffy89502's bold assertions, too.
Rohit Dhanna (2020-07-25 04:03:23+00:00): 88482422
Rohit Dhanna (2020-07-25 04:30:53+00:00): 88482422
paulbrunner (2025-01-04 09:13:31+00:00): Hi datbrahm,

this changeset breaks routing for emergency access, pedestrians, and cyclists. Bing Streetside shows that the streets are connected, but were blocked by a truck in 2015, this might however have been temporary.

I've reverted this changeset in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160977486 and will now c

I saw that your account is work-related, linked to Amazon Logistics. In case you come back to OSM, happy mapping.

All the best,
Paul
paulbrunner (2025-01-04 09:17:15+00:00): I have now created this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4575279
tastrax (2020-09-07 11:02:50+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
saintam1 (2020-07-25 09:47:05+00:00): Уау, чудесна работа! 👍
mosstreet (2020-07-26 10:26:05+00:00): HI
sand is for those who only read English? you have made changes in the territory where they communicate in Russian, if you open the wiki, then it is clearly written there that the names indicate only their own applied to this object.
MatterOmaps (2020-07-28 04:06:24+00:00): Hi mosstreet, thanks for reaching out. I did not name this feature, but just snapped it to the coastline. It was named by the previous user who added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73695000. I don’t believe it is a proper name though as it explains the surface type. This name tag probably should be removed or changed to surface=sand instead. Would you agree?
RiverBearings (2020-08-11 20:01:37+00:00): Hello Romy Alendra. 
I’ve noticed that you have left some overlapping highways in this changeset and others such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88487398. Your note that the “road is not connected to others” suggests that you’re trying to restrict navigation at this intersection. Was this your intent? If so, have you considered creating a turn restriction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction) on this road instead of avoiding the intersection at nodes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Junctions)? 
Thanks,
RiverBearings
eggie (2020-07-25 07:00:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review naam op gebouw name=Staat Leeg verwijderd. Domino's Pizza verwijderd Saat al op de kaart. .. gebouw Biergarten verwijderd. Het is een terras geen gebouw, maar nu omgetagd naar  leisure=outdoor_seating
MVG,
Eggie
user_8655426 (2020-07-25 08:04:57+00:00): こんにちは。
テストコースを highway=raceway に変更されましたが、テスト用のコースは、モーターレース(モータースポーツ)を行う道路ではないと思います。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway=raceway?uselang=ja
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmotor
jy25 (2020-08-21 16:26:00+00:00): 確認が遅くなってすみません。
高速周回路と思われるものであってもレース用のものではないものは敷地内道路扱いするのですね。誤解しておりました。修正します。
user_8655426 (2020-08-22 01:11:05+00:00): 返信と修正、ありがとうございます。
どう修正すべきかを書かず、問題を指摘するのみのコメントで、申し訳ありませんでした。
osmviborg (2020-07-25 07:45:35+00:00): Jeg har ændret disse "måske bygninger" til 'building:proposed=yes' Med din metode bliver de renderet, på standart kortet, som eksisterende bygninger.
PT-53 (2020-07-26 07:01:26+00:00): Hallo okilimu,
für diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829949261/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.54412&lat=47.59928&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
okilimu (2020-07-26 07:32:46+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für den Hinweis, habe meinen Fehler korrigiert
assanges (2020-07-30 04:36:07+00:00): 呃……抱歉唐突一問。
閣下三蘆區域的這個編輯是根據哪邊的資料繪製而成？
Bert Araali (2021-03-03 21:04:57+00:00): Hello,
Your recent changes contain 1997 nodes with the key road_name. It was detected as a various serious undocumented change.  The road_name is different from the name of the highways.  Please explain.  If the crossings have a different name you should just use the name fields, not road_name since it interferes with our quality tools.  If they are added by accident, please delete them.  In case you need any help, please reply to this comment or contact me direct.
Automated translation:
你好，
您最近所做的更改包含鍵名為road_name的1997個節點。它被檢測為各種嚴重的未記錄的更改。 road_name與高速公路的名稱不同。請解釋。如果路口使用不同的名稱，則應僅使用名稱字段，而不要使用road_name，因為它會干擾我們的質量工具。如果是偶然添加的，請刪除它們。如果您需要任何幫助，請回复此評論或直接與我聯繫。

Greetings,
Bert Araali
Ceclan Mitruţ (2020-12-19 13:44:42+00:00): Local police has moved it's building into a new location, closer to Viișoara. The building that you set to be local police is now empty and not used by any institution.
yadathot (2020-07-25 07:42:53+00:00): Added gates and edited access tag as per Private Maxar imagery.
user_5359 (2020-07-29 05:42:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on node http://www.osm.org/node/7746223890: Did you mean length instead lenght?
Obsi (2020-07-29 16:18:44+00:00): Yes. I will correct my mistake this week.
Obsi (2020-08-01 05:22:11+00:00): it is fixed
Nakaner (2020-07-25 20:12:14+00:00): Hallo,

wenn die Namen noch als Gewannbezeichnungen in Gebrauch sind, würde ich sie als place=locality lassen. Hast du diesbezüglich den Benutzer daniel_k, der sie erfasst hat, gefragt. Du könntest https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76509292 kommentieren, um das zu tun.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88488455
Nonexhudlix (2020-07-26 15:56:04+00:00): Hallo Michael,

Das Vorgehen hatte ich mit daniel_k im Rahmen anderer Changesets besprochen. Trotzdem danke für den Hinweis bzgl locality, ich werde das prüfen und ggf. anpassen.

Grüße

Joachim
user_2066394 (2020-07-25 10:50:56+00:00): Wie ist dann der Wert für smoothness=*, wenn nicht intermediate?
Horst2303 (2020-07-25 11:31:37+00:00): Bei normalen Verkehrsstraßen mit Oberfläche=Asphalt hat praktisch keine Straße das smoothness-Attribut. Wenn jetzt einzelne Straßen mit diesem Attribut versehen werden, verwirrt das. Bin die Straße gestern mit dem Rennrad gefahren. Kenne im Umkreis von 5 km ne ganze Reihe weiterer Straßen mit ähnlicher Oberfläche und ohne smoothness-Attribut. 
Es gibt zu diesem Thema eine Diskussion im englischen OSM-Wiki. 
wurzelast: Falls du hier smoothness gesetzt hast und dich meine Worte nicht überzeugen, dann setz es halt wieder. Lies dir aber vorher die erwähnte Diskussion durch...
Nakaner (2020-07-25 12:36:27+00:00): Hallo Horst2303,

bitte entferne smoothness=* nicht, auch wenn du es unnötig findest. Der Key ist zur Feinklassifizierung zwischen perfekter Asphaltdecke und einer Schlaglochpiste gut geeignet und wird auch von Routingengines teilweise ausgewertet.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Osmwithspace (2023-02-06 11:50:18+00:00): Hallo,
der Weg hängt nicht am Rest der Karte. Das ist immer schlecht …
Gruß Osmwithspace
literan (2020-07-25 11:08:29+00:00): мы добавляем на карту физически существующие на местности объекты, а не виртуальные сущности вроде сайтов, ИП или юрлиц.
Rainero (2020-07-27 17:23:00+00:00): Hallo pgoerti,
willkommen bei OSM!
Auf diese Änderung bin ich gestoßen, weil in addr:street die Hausnummern standen. In addr:housenumber waren sie auch (richtig), aber in addr:street gehört der Straßenname.
Ich habe das korrigiert und die Adressen einzeln auf die Eingänge gelegt wie das bei den Nachbargebäuden auch gemacht ist.
Aber vermutlich geht das mit Streetcomplete nicht, man wird nur Angaben an bestehenden Objekten hinzufügen können.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-07-25 17:22:46+00:00): hello, you incorrectly added an entire block as a cafe. that makes no sense.
alphensebezorger (2020-07-25 11:45:48+00:00): Hallo eggie,
area=yes is toch overbodig op multipolygons, die beschrijven immers altijd een oppervlak? Als OFM daar niet mee overweg kan, lijkt me dat geen goede reden om de data op OSM aan te passen.
Groeten, Alphensebezorger.
eggie (2020-07-25 12:11:29+00:00): Dat was ook de reden dat ik area=yes heb wegelaten. Josm geeft geen foutmelding.. dus kwaad kan het volgens mij niet niet. 
Het probleem zit m in die highway pedestrians.. maar die had ik gemapt voor de juiste routering.
'k Wacht even af wat Mapgein wil.. want die heeft moeite met dat vlak pedestrian. 
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 12:17:46+00:00): De discussie loopt via PB met Mapgein.
Dat gaat er juist over dat gps-apparaten anders omgaan met de resolutie.  Alle gebouwen, rotondes e.d zien er dan ook gemankeerd uit. 
 Het zij zo.
eggie (2020-07-25 10:33:34+00:00): Hi Errest .. welcome to OSM. I don't think this is a proper edit.. Why marked crossing in the middle of the river 
You also connected the 	Allée Jean Genier to the river and the landuse =residential?
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 10:33:47+00:00): Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88490418
eggie (2020-07-25 10:43:16+00:00): reverted by changeset  #88491861
If you need any assistance please ask.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 10:35:32+00:00): Hi...  Look at your edits again please.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88490535
Greerz,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 10:46:23+00:00): reverted by changeset  #88491861

No marked crossing in the middle of the river.
Please look here how to map a bridge.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
Greetz,
eggie