piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
julcnx (2021-08-18 07:57:54+00:00): - is the beginning of the road public and giving access to permanent residences? if yes, you might need to split the road into 2 segments and have the first part as residential and the second as service. if not highway=service works great.
- service=driveway are usually the very last small section leading to a building, the main roads around a property can be tagged as highway=service alone

You will find the latest guidelines for minor road classifications here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109846031
cookies584 (2021-08-22 06:03:43+00:00): Thank you I've fixed that now
wkdgs (2021-08-18 12:57:30+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,

ich schreibe dir, weil du bei deiner Bearbeitung angegeben hast, dass nochmal jemand drüberschauen soll.

Privatwege müssen in OpenStreetMap nicht gelöscht werden. Es soll (normalerweise) das gemappt werden, was auf dem Boden existiert und dazu gehören auch Privatwege. 

Stattdessen gibt es in OpenStreetMap die Möglichkeit solche Wege als Privatweg zu kennzeichnen, sodass diese von Routing-Software ignoriert werden. Dazu fügt man z.B. den Tag "access=private" zu dem entsprechenden Weg hinzu.

Es kann auch Gründe geben, Privatwege zu löschen. Z.B. wenn diese durch einen privaten Garten führen oder, wenn es Bedenken hinsichtlich Naturschutz gibt.

Ich würde daher vorschlagen den Weg wieder hinzuzufügen und mit "access=private" zu versehen.

LG
winkeldings
x58 (2021-08-18 06:56:31+00:00): Hi Brimketill,

I have reverted this back to highway:track. I actually surveyed this road last week. It meets all the criteria outlined in the wiki for track. It is an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS ROAD that only some farmers use with 4x4 vehicles. Nobody else has any business going through there.

Please review your process at Apple that leads to these kinds of regressions where you overwrite survey data with interpretations of Esri imagery.
Brimketill (2021-08-19 19:54:04+00:00): Hi x58, Thank you for reaching out about this and contributing your local knowledge to the map! I was thinking that this road would be better classified as unclassified, as it looks like a through road providing access to two villages and has many more minor roads branching off of it. The OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified) mentions using unclassified “for roads used to connect other towns, villages or hamlets” and notes it’s considered the “lowest level of the interconnecting grid network”, which fits this scenario well. 

I understand your concern about road surface quality, but the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Assumptions) also mentions that highway classifications "do not imply anything about road quality, only importance and intended main use.” To represent the poor road surface quality here and discourage routing, I’d recommend doing exactly what you’ve already done by adding smoothness and track type tags. If you believe this should also be restricted to 4x4 vehicles, I’d suggest adding a 4wd_only=yes tag as well. Let me know what you think!
x58 (2021-08-21 11:51:14+00:00): Thanks for the response. First off, I agree with the point about road classification and road quality being two separate concerns in OSM. The reason I seem to conflate them in my original objection is because actually the road quality in this case affects the real-world use of the road and therefore indirectly affects its classification (i.e. only farmers use it).

Regarding the actual classification There are two parts to my argument. The first concerns the phrase you quoted from the wiki. You quote a part of the highway=unclassified wiki page which mentions the ambiguous word "connect". What does it mean that a highway "connects" two villages? If we quote more of the sentence it is partially clarified:

"highway=unclassified should be used for roads used for local traffic, and for roads used to connect other towns, villages or hamlets"

The key phrase here is "local traffic". This brings us back to my original contention. This road is _not_ used for local traffic. Local traffic to Κάτω Μούσουρα comes from further South from Αγριλιά where there is an asphalt road in reasonably good condition. Therefore, if to connect implies the existence of local traffic, this road does not in this sense connect the two villages Κεφαλόβρυσο and Κάτω Μούσουρα.

For the second part of my argument I will refer to the same wiki page in the "How to Map > When is this applicable?" section which essentially states:

"when other highway=* tags are more applicable, use those instead. If a public road is [among others] not a highway=track", then it's probably an unclassified road."

So finally, I will argue that this road qualifies as a highway=track. In the highway=track wiki page, under "How to decide" there are several conditions which qualify or disqualify a highway for being a track. I posit that there is no condition that disqualifies this road (we can actually argue this point if you disagree) but I will specifically point to this condition: "A farm track used for access to crop fields, pastures, orchards or similar agricultural land." This is exactly what this road is used for. Also the final sentence "As long as the primary purpose of the road is land access, highway=track is appropriate." Again, this is a match because farmers use this road to get to their fields.

So, in short: It's a track and not an unclassified road because only farmers use it and people who want to move between the two villages chose the other, safer and more passable routes.

Apologies for the wall of text but I wanted to be clear about my arguments. Thanks for reading and for your consideration.
Brimketill (2021-08-23 23:57:31+00:00): Thank you for the really thoughtfully laid out arguments here! I fully understand your approach in this scenario and agree with you that in this case track would certainly be more appropriate. Thank you for taking the time to add your individual points to clarify this situation.
skyper (2021-08-19 13:15:43+00:00): Hallo krjkotam
Wer hat Dir denn beigebracht wie Parkplätze am Fahrbahnrand eingetragen werden?
Für mich sieht das alles aus wie `parking=street_side`. Dann aber bitte als Fläche und nicht mit der Straße verbunden wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974659019

Bitte gehe alle Deine bisherigen Änderungen durch und nicht nur diesen CS und korrigiere die Parkplätze. Danke

Grüße skyper

#REVIEWED_BAD
krjkotam (2021-08-30 11:55:54+00:00): Hello Skyper, 
Thanks for looking into my edits. As said, I am new to OSM and these learnings from you add a great value to my edits. I will definitely make sure to not make such mistakes. Happy to learn from the community. Please refer to changeset(110457306). 
Regards,
krjkotam.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-08-18 21:14:49+00:00): credo che sarebbe meglio mettere scogliera più che area cani poichè in mappa si vede la spiaggia cani quando il tutto ancora non c'è, tantomeno il relativo cantiere
fabiotofy (2021-08-19 04:19:02+00:00): Ho messo il tag proposed con le date di inizio lavori e presunta fine
Sanniu (2022-04-04 14:07:51+00:00): Hi

The https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974205198 is part of roundabout, am I right?
Tsur Halamish (2022-04-05 10:30:26+00:00): Yes you are right.
Sanniu (2022-04-05 13:25:16+00:00): OK, I refitted it into roundabout with a right tags.
Tsur Halamish (2022-04-05 17:29:29+00:00): Thank you!
zstadler (2022-01-01 09:31:54+00:00): Hello Flayer,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

In this edit you have modified the boundary of the military training area.
The original boundary was taken from official data, as can be seen at https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=197315.85,651589.75&z=7&lay=FIRE_AREAS

What is the source of the changed boundary?
zstadler (2025-05-30 12:43:27+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166970161
osmviborg (2021-08-18 06:44:24+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst at rette/flytte eller på anden måde manipolere adresse- punkterne. Adresserne bliver vedligeholdt at en automatisk proces. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
osmviborg (2021-08-18 06:45:30+00:00): Jeg har tilbageført din rettelse.
EinKonstanzer (2021-10-14 17:02:42+00:00): Diese Änderung halt ich für nicht sinnvoll. "Faulbehälter" ist kein Behälter im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank. Weder Faulbehälter, noch die Parkbank haben einen Namen.
hmkaiser (2021-10-15 06:44:20+00:00): Hallo EinKonstanzer, 
da gebe ich dir völlig recht. Ich habe allerdings im Bereich "Klärwerk Düsseldorf Süd" nur einige "building=yes" auf "man_made=storage_tank" geändert, unter Belassung der bereits im Jahr 2013 von einem anderen User erfassten Angaben, sofern diese nicht der den Objekten zugrunde liegenden Eigenschaft "storage_tank" widersprechen.
aceman444 (2024-11-24 09:52:43+00:00): This building has 6 levels, in the OSM model. Ground floor counts as 1 too.
Violaine_Do (2021-09-08 01:16:34+00:00): Hi thks for the contributions in our fenua. But please take care of the original position of objects :  You need to first shift imagery so it fits with all the buildings already mapped with a high accuracy... Thks for correcting or reverting your changes. If you need any help don't hesitate to reach out :) Violaine
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109852697
DunAonghasa (2021-09-09 16:03:19+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, Thanks for notifying me, I missed checking the Maxar imagery offset, as I found the Strava traces is matching with your previous digitization, I have fixed it.
user_11435438 (2021-08-20 11:55:53+00:00): AH1是亚洲高速编号，不要加在ref里面。ref标本国编号即可。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109852870
Mr_Terry (2021-08-20 14:04:31+00:00): 很抱歉
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-08-19 00:17:07+00:00): hello, can you explain why you are changing the geometry of an element that comes from the legal and official boundaries of Portugal?
DaleOfAire (2021-08-20 19:07:42+00:00): Hi NunoCaldeira, I meant to change the geometry of the coastline, not the government boundary. If you give me some time, I will revert my edits here.
dgitto (2021-08-30 17:13:06+00:00): welcome OSM,
the tag "name" should only contain the NAME of an object (no descriptive labels). In this case "Via Ruscello", if this is the name. I remove the rest of the label
martinst (2021-10-12 15:11:14+00:00): Die zeitliche Einschränkung des Betretungsverbots kann man so eintragen:
access:conditional=no @ (Apr 1 - Sep 30)
SafetyIng (2021-08-18 11:40:33+00:00): How could be this road a hw=track?
Please look at the wiki when and when not to use hw=track.
madnikhi (2021-08-20 11:10:38+00:00): Hello SafetyIng,
Thanks for checking this. I have now changed the highway classification that suits the vicinity. Kindly look into the changeset (109981570 )with modifications and please let me know if there is any miss from my end. 
Regards,
madnikhi
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-08-19 00:15:09+00:00): hello, can you explain why you removed several islet tags?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-08-20 10:07:26+00:00): Hello again, i see you continue to edit and have not replied to my questions.

I will ask one more time before reporting this to DWG of OSMF about Apple not complying to Organized editing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

All the changesets that you have made will be reverted if Apple will not reply.

PS: A private message will be send complementary of this changeset comment.

Kind regards,

Nuno
DaleOfAire (2021-08-20 19:05:55+00:00): Hi NunoCaldeira, I was following the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Usage). I added all the land, including the place tag, to the main island relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1715039). That is why I have removed the islet tag from the outer member.
ika-chan! (2021-08-20 18:53:43+00:00): You have to be careful in preserving street lighting data (lit=*). They exist for the safety of drivers, especially at night, and it is a valid tag.
user_9221753 (2021-08-20 19:16:17+00:00): I don't think i made any change about lit on this road. I changed only name and surface.
Or i didnt mean to change it if it existed.
user_12858253 (2021-08-26 07:29:14+00:00): I'm sorry but these are NOT buildings. The land at this area as you can see is used as farmland, you must have mistaken organic vegetable gardens for buildings. I suggest you delete them. Thank you.
EtangDeBerre (2021-08-27 12:18:35+00:00): Hi greece1821, thank you for pointing this area out! I mistakenly thought these were small building structures. I have reverted the additions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110273562.
user_12858253 (2021-08-26 07:28:04+00:00): I'm sorry but these are NOT buildings. The land at this area as you can see is used as farmland, you must have mistaken organic vegetable gardens for buildings. I suggest you delete them. Thank you.
EtangDeBerre (2021-08-27 12:19:12+00:00): Hi greece1821, please see my comment from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109859005. Thanks again!
user_3022894 (2021-09-01 15:41:26+00:00): Thanks! :-)
maraf24 (2021-09-30 18:53:50+00:00): Imo obszary Natura 2000 nie są rezerwatami przyrody, to są obszary ochrony przyrody.
C2oc4 (2021-10-17 06:55:52+00:00): kurde wzorowałem się na jakiś rezerwacie który był tak zrobiony i powiedzmy ze skopiowałem rozwiązanie
Dustin C (2021-08-18 15:24:13+00:00): `parking:lane:right = parallel` is a way to indicate the rightmost lane is used for parking
amakarevich_lyft (2021-08-19 13:31:26+00:00): Hi, Dustin C!  My name is Artem and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to this!
In this case I put notes about 4th lane in changeset comment, just to clarify the reason why I deleted 4th left lane from lanes count according to OSM rules about lanes counting (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes). I added the tag “parking:lane:left = parallel” in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109930952) to have this information represented on the map.
Please, contact us, if you have any additional questions or data regarding this edit. Thank you for your contribution!
Regards, Artem
baindter (2021-09-04 19:19:23+00:00): Hallo GittaS,
bitte prüfe diesen und die anderen Edits im Zusammenhang mit Neubauten. Openstreetmap ist keine Werbeplattform. Bei Baustellen bitte das "construction"-Präfix verwenden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Ansonsten weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen!
Danke!
Roland
Akkurator (2021-09-20 21:33:44+00:00): s.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111125469
BCNorwich (2021-08-18 13:28:12+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

What was odd about the footpath, it can clearly be seen on Bing imagery? If you know the area perhaps you could improve the footpath mapping rather than merely deleting it. I could reinstate the path so you can improve it, if you wish.

Regards Bernard.
Pete Robinson (2021-08-18 13:48:12+00:00): You can restore if you like - i wouldn't describe it as a footpath tho - it's kinda of an internal path ... used to get to from the flats on the ground floor and to the bin area (in top right) ... it's only accessible from inside the grounds of the flats (there's a gate at the front)
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-19 05:07:50+00:00): Hello. Please stop damaging our data. These roads are far from being connecting roads. Change reverted.
Dawid2849 (2021-08-18 08:27:51+00:00): Przepraszam za bbox, poprawiałem geometrię rowu przy lubelskiej, zapominając, że na tej samej warstwie miałem nowe adresy w różnych częściach powiatu.
SafetyIng (2021-08-18 11:47:25+00:00): Hey, für ein "Bürgerhaus" gibt es extra ein anderes Tagging. 
Für Dorfgemeinschaftshäuser und co wäre dies: amenity=community_centre und community_centre=village_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre

Das name=* Tag ist immer nur für den eindeutigen Namen eines Objektes. Hier wäre es auch z.B. auch Bürgerhaus "Dorfscheune" ;) 

Bei sonstigen Fragen zu OSM kannst du dich auch gerne an mich wenden
Grüße
Robin
SafetyIng (2021-08-18 11:42:56+00:00): Hey, das Objekt "Name" ist anscheinend eher falsch.
Der Kindergarten wird sicher auch einen Namen haben. Aber zur Kennzeichnung eines Kindergartens gibt es das tag amenity=kindergarten . Damit am besten sogar das ganze Gelände kennzeichnen.
iWowik (2021-08-19 10:07:48+00:00): День добрый!
1) В название населенного пункта не надо писать длинное сочинение, только его название.
2) Название элемента улично-дорожной сети Центральная это Центральная аллея, Центральная набережная или Центральная площадь.
Принято писать полностью.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201368489
user_12858253 (2021-08-26 07:28:10+00:00): I'm sorry but these are NOT buildings. The land at this area as you can see is used as farmland, you must have mistaken organic vegetable gardens for buildings. I suggest you delete them. Thank you.
EtangDeBerre (2021-08-27 12:19:24+00:00): Hi greece1821, please see my comment from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109859005. Thanks again!
ralley (2021-08-18 21:40:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Many buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109858613
totera (2021-08-18 20:40:12+00:00): Ciao Michele, i tuoi gruppi di modifiche occupano solitamente mezza Italia e risultano alquanto fastidiosi per chi tiene d'occhio una piccola zona.
Potresti per favore caricare separatamente le modifiche che fai in città diverse? Grazie
eggie (2021-08-18 10:01:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
PhysicsArmature (2021-08-18 08:49:59+00:00): Things get interesting when OSM and world indoor mapping usually uses 0 as the main floor but America generally uses 1 as the main floor. That might be one thing for me to fix. I would need -1 to 7.
user_12858253 (2021-08-26 07:28:24+00:00): I'm sorry but these are NOT buildings. The land at this area as you can see is used as farmland, you must have mistaken organic vegetable gardens for buildings. I suggest you delete them. Thank you.
EtangDeBerre (2021-08-27 12:18:52+00:00): Hi greece1821, all incorrect building additions in this area have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110273562. Thanks for the feedback!
Eebie (2021-08-18 11:59:46+00:00): jij hebt hier de fietssnelweg onzichtbaar gemaakt. Langs die fietsroute staan al enkele jaren bordjes dat het een fietssnelweg is. Enkel het nummer ervan werd gewijzigd op de website van de fietssnelwegen. Gelieve te herstellen zodat deze route weer zichtbaar is als fietssnelwegen op kaarten.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-18 12:10:57+00:00): Dag Eebie, 

Bedankt voor uw bemerking. 

Ik ben aan het stuk in As begin mei van dit jaar nog gepasseerd en ik heb daar geen bord gezien die deze fietssnelweg van As tot Maaseik bewegwijzert. Het enige wat ik ben tegengekomen is dit bord, maar dat is geen bewegwijzering: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=245066154098496

Heb je foto's/bewijs van andere borden?
Eebie (2021-08-18 19:53:40+00:00): In 2018 stonden er al borden langs die fietsroute die de route benoemden als Fietssnelweg. Die route in 2021 wissen als Fietssnelweg is het licht van de zon ontkennen omdat er niet genoeg borden staan. Is er ergens vastgelegd hoeveel borden en welke borden er moeten staan om te voorkomen dat een Fietssnelweg, 3 jaar nadat er moeite is in gestoken om die route te fietsen en te taggen, weer wordt gewist.
joost schouppe (2021-08-19 07:37:21+00:00): Hoi Eebie,
De aanpassingen zijn volgens de afspraak zoals we die voorbereid hebben met een paar van de kernleden van OSM-BE, gedocumenteerd op de wiki en gedeeld op talk-be. Voel je vrij om een en ander in vraag te stellen via deze thread: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2021-July/011313.html
Ik post daar zelf al even een verwijzing naar deze discussie.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-23 09:57:34+00:00): Dag Eebie,
Ik heb navraag gedaan bij de provincies en dit is het antwoord:
"Het bord op de F751 is een promobord waarvan er in de provincie Limburg enkele staan langs fietssnelwegen.
Omdat het bord geen info geeft over de route, zelfs niet het routenummer, beschouwen we dit niet als een bewegwijzerd stuk fietssnelweg.

Hieronder in 1 zin wat wij beschouwen als een bewegwijzerde fietssnelweg:
"Een fietssnelweg is bewegwijzerd als er een systematische bewegwijzering met de F-huisstijl is toegepast over de volledige lengte van de route, bestaande uit borden en/of grondmarkeringen, die gebruikers handvaten geeft om zich op de route te oriënteren en die helpt bij het navigeren over de route."

De wiki is ondertussen aangevuld met bovenstaande uitleg.

-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3DBE-VLG:cycle_highway#1.29_Regular_cycle_highway
eggie (2021-08-18 10:15:55+00:00): Dag Misch  Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM

office=logistics ?

MVG
eggie
Misch60 (2021-08-18 10:34:32+00:00): Ahh oke, check. Het is inderdaad dan office=logistics!
eggie (2021-08-18 11:08:12+00:00): Voeg je de regel zelf toe?
gr eggie
NieWnen (2021-08-18 20:49:12+00:00): Znowu został usunięty adres z budynku!
NieWnen (2021-08-18 22:55:02+00:00): Naprawiłem adresy.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109859858
Eebie (2021-08-18 12:13:53+00:00): Jij hebt hier de fietssnelweg onzichtbaar gemaakt. Langs die fietsroute staan al enkele jaren bordjes dat het een fietssnelweg is.  Gelieve te herstellen zodat deze route weer zichtbaar is als fietssnelwegen op kaarten.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-18 12:24:02+00:00): ok, hier wel vanaf de brug van Kempische Steenweg naar het westen toe. Ik geef het door.
-> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=953314015402095
totera (2021-08-18 20:43:40+00:00): Ciao gspinoza, non sei un principiante di OSM, potresti per rispetto degli altri mappatori dare commenti significativi ai tuoi gruppi di modifiche? Grazie
skyper (2021-08-19 13:17:54+00:00): Hi
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109847811

#REVIEWED_BAD
krjkotam (2021-08-30 11:21:39+00:00): Hello Skyper, 
Thanks for checking into my edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the feature as parking aisle. Thanks for the suggestion. Please find the changeset(110455339) for the reversion. I will take this as a learning and I'll make sure to cross verify twice before making any edits. 
Regards,
krjkotam
MovieStoreGuy (2021-08-18 09:18:54+00:00): Adding in venue information for exposure sites
nevw (2021-08-18 10:02:52+00:00): Hi
It would be best to discuss this import of data to the osm with the Australian community via this mailing list site https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Eebie (2021-08-18 12:05:11+00:00): J
ij hebt hier de fietssnelweg onzichtbaar gemaakt. Langs die fietsroute staan al enkele jaren bordjes dat het een fietssnelweg is. Enkel het nummer ervan werd gewijzigd op de website van de fietssnelwegen. Het gaat nu om F722 Lanaken-Riemst. Gelieve te herstellen zodat deze route weer zichtbaar is als fietssnelwegen op kaarten.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-18 12:15:53+00:00): ook hier vind ik niet echt bewegwijzeringsborden. Alleen dit tegengekomen (kwaliteit is wel niet denderend): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=540576723625195
ter info: wat we onder bewegwijzering verstaan staat hier beschreven -> https://hackmd.io/127apGHrS_6_FEfcGfcnNw?view