piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
smootheFiets (2020-11-25 12:46:22+00:00): ... en dan krijg je dit: https://goo.gl/maps/2wYXKcB8e4tJ9Mr1A  :(
(geen mapping-bron, natuurlijk)
Geim (2020-11-25 16:51:47+00:00): Maar als je op de huizen kijkt staat daar niet D 46.
smootheFiets (2020-11-26 07:57:20+00:00): Je hebt gelijk. Ik ga dit overal aanpassen en geef het door aan de ontwikkelaars van het BAG plugin.
smootheFiets (2020-11-27 09:28:27+00:00): Gerepareerd:  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94883967
en https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94884122

Bedankt voor het opletten!
sanchi (2020-10-29 11:06:30+00:00): Hola Gelino. 
Por lo que veo en este y en otros conjuntos de cambios estas quitando las áreas residenciales existentes. Estás quitando información valiosa e importante del mapa. 
¿Puedes indicarnos porque estás borrando las áreas residenciales de la zona?
Un saludo.
Rodrigo Rega (2020-10-29 12:22:25+00:00): Hola Gelino. Ten en cuenta que lo que te comunica sanchi y los mensajes anteriores de Iváns no vienen de ellos a modo particular, la comunidad española está preocupada por este tipo de ediciones, las cuales degradan la calidad del mapa. Si tienes cualquier duda te invito a que te respondas a los conjuntos de cambios o que hables con la comunidad vía Telegram o la lista de correo. Un saludo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93228210
Gelino (2020-10-30 09:40:08+00:00): una zona residencial entiendo que es una zona tipo urbanización y no como se está poniendo una vivienda individual o una aldea. Saludo.
sanchi (2020-10-30 11:02:43+00:00): Me temo que no es así. Puedes ir a cualquier población de España que pocas te deberías encontrar ya que no tengan el landuse=residential 
Es cualquier zona con casas. No siempre pueblos o aldeas enteras sino solo lo que es residencial. Aunque en muchos casos por falta de zonas reseñables que no tengan otro tipo de edificios, puede ser una aldea entera como en este caso.
Además yo tampoco veo mucha diferencia entre una aldea y una urbanización, ¿que están más colocadas las casas?
El tema de viviendas individuales puede tener discursión, yo tampoco lo veo pero habría que verlo y hablarlo. Pero lo de las áreas residenciales de aldeas o cosas parecidas creo que esta bastante claro. Se puede mejorar el área en algunos casos, pero no borrarla.
Antes de borrar cosas tan grandes en varias zonas se debería hablar con la comunidad. Te animo como te ha dicho Rodrigo Rega a que te unas a telegram o a la lista de correo.
https://t.me/OSMes
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-es

Un saludo.
Frans S (2020-10-29 11:36:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)
update 28 october 2020:  Project imagery should load automaticly at opening of a task.

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
skfd (2020-11-02 14:58:15+00:00): Добрый день! Подскажите пожалуйста по какой инструкции вы добавляли точку?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93229487
mueschel (2020-11-01 18:13:09+00:00): Please check this restaurant, it got a strange 'diet:re' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864971051
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-29 15:26:37+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you deleted things here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839728183 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Kovoschiz (2020-10-29 12:24:37+00:00): Please don't remove `highway=traffic_signals` with `ref=`, at least until the junction/crossing is modeled; and it can be coverted into a `man_made=street_cabinet` or junction area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93231923
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 08:34:55+00:00): Ciao,
una corsia ciclabile non è fisicamente separata dalla strada, pertanto non va disegnato un segmento a sè stante ma va semplicemente aggiunto il tag cycleway:both=lane o cycleway:right=lane al segmento esistente della strada.
Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap.
A presto,

Alessandro
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
GinaroZ (2020-10-29 15:40:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've moved the address details from the building to a node at the approx location of the door - hope this matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add more address details to the surrounding houses if you have local knowledge :)
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Kovoschiz (2020-10-29 12:25:25+00:00): Please don't remove `is_in:*=`. It's only deprecated when there are `boundary=administrative`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93234484
Kovoschiz (2020-10-29 12:27:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444180322/ this is a combined soccer and basketball area. Something else should be done about it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93234484
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
frosm (2020-10-30 13:43:44+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
les horaires d'ouverture sont sans doute une des choses les plus difficiles à encoder avec les outils actuels.
par ex les jours de la semaine n'utilisent que les 2 premières lettres et avec un ; entre les groupes de jour.
vous souhaitez donc probablement encoder Mo 12:00-19:15; Tu-Sa 09:00-19:15
un outil pratique pour encoder et visualiser https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo%2012:00-19:15;%20Tu-Sa%2009:00-19:15
Par ailleurs, la rue, la ville et le code postal étaient déjà encodé dans osm via des relations qui regroupe toute l'étendue de ceux-ci
Bonne continuation
frosm (2020-10-30 08:38:03+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
avez-vous repris l'emplacement du magaasin "Huile épices et papilles" devenu vide ou celui-ci existe toujours ?
car vous avez repris une partie de ses informations.
par ailleurs, le nom de votre magasin est-il si long ? il semble être pour moitié à un nom et pour moitié à une description.
pour finir, vous vous être classé comme un centre commercial (un lieu qui abrite plusieurs boutiques) au lieu d'un magasin de vetement à priori
Bonne continuation
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
flother (2020-10-29 16:18:29+00:00): Hi ASR11,

Thanks for taking an interest in golf courses in Iceland. If I could make one suggestion: use the "Maxar Standard Imagery (Beta)" satellite imagery when editing. Maxar's imagery is from this year, Bing's is much older. Maxar is also much better aligned than Bing — Bing can be offset quite a bit.

Thanks again for your edits.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
BCNorwich (2020-10-29 12:51:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing.
I've removed access=no from the path as this indicate there is no public access. If it's a public footpath then clearly there is access to it. I've added designation=public_footpath and changed surface=trail to surface=ground.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
BCNorwich (2020-10-29 13:05:37+00:00): Hi if the path is a right of way then there is access and by foot is public not permissive. I've amended a few tags.
Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 14:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102701528 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers in Saudi Arabia.
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-29 17:49:58+00:00): Note: name:pl which do not represent todays name (do not have meaning or phonetic relation to name) will be moved to old_name:pl.
Jay May (2020-10-29 19:35:02+00:00): I'd suggest you not to move every single of such names to "old_name:pl" without asking just because at first sight you think doesn't have any meaning or phonetic relation to name or name:lt. 
1) Parszuniszki and Narsūniškės are not exactly the most distant ones. I don't see the logic behind moving this one to old_name:pl
2) There are several other names that don't seem to be related at 1st sight, but are related to words meaning the same in both languages (ex.: Meiliūnai from "meilė" and Kochanówka - "kochać" = love). Sometimes, they have a historical meaning which makes it important for Lithuanian or Polish researchers, etc. It helps them also, sometimes, to establish where a name was Slavicized or Balticized.
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-29 19:50:18+00:00): Some names are balticised after being slavicised from baltic names :-D it's a total mess sometimes. Some names are balticised totally incorrectly, like bezdanny becomming bezdonys instead of bedugniai, hard to understand, how somebody understanding Lithuanian would use such a name for a place :-D Some names have been slavicies from baltic names incorrectly and therefore now they have been incorrectly balticised back (some examples around Kernavė). So I do take into account the meaning of a Polish word, but if in Lithuanian it is Raudondvaris, in Polish it could be Czerwony dwor or Raudondwary, but can never by Bialy les (totally invented examples). Historical names are not contemporary names, therefore should go to old_name:xx.
Given what is said above, what is a relation between Narsūniškės and Parszuniszki?
Jay May (2020-10-30 07:16:09+00:00): I was talking lately with a professor regarding such cases as Narsūniškės and Parszuniszki, I have found such cases also in Belarus (f.ex.: Arabinowszczyzna which became Arabaŭščyna). His theory is that after territories switched to other countries, some people were trying to transliterate some old Polish names (or old Russian names, etc.) and they made copy/paste mistakes for some syllabes or letters. A bit as if your last name "Straupis" became suddenly "Strauss". 
Regarding your comment: I am fascinated by this part of Europe ever since I live in Lithuania in this sense: Northeastern Poland, Western Belarus, Lithuania and Eastern Latvia are full of names that are either Slavic, either Baltic, and it is totally mixed up. 
I never investigated regarding Bezdonys, but the only time I went there I thought "either this name comes from Polish "bez danych" (without data ... which sounds too modern), "bez dań" ("without dish"...), either from Lithuanian "beždžionė" ... after which I thought apes are not exactly the most common animal species in the region :D I had also thought about "be dugnės", but the only water I found there was close to the Bezdonys manor, and it didn't seem deep at all! Who knows how it was 1000 years ago ...
For some names, it's hard to track whether they are Slavic or Baltic. Ex.: Sakalinė (sakalas) = Sokoleńszczyzna (sokół). Researchers must have a lot of fun establishing such matters.
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-30 10:59:24+00:00): Add fino-ugric (estonian) language to the mix. A number of old names while sound very lithuanian have no meaning in lithuanian but do have a meaning in estonian. However, all this being very interesting, OSM is not a place for scientific research of the languages, name:pl is a contemporary name of something (in our case place). While I ignore the thing that non Lithuanian names are not written in most of the places or in official documents and thus according to OSM rules should not be entered, but leaving that, there should be some way to verify name:pl, guesswork is not a good way for OSM (neither is copy-pasting from wikidata). So what is a link between Narsūniškės and Parszuniszki? (Possible error is not a good answer as that could "prove" anything and it is not verifiable). And such names would be unusable in a future Polish map of Lithuania.
Hungerburg (2020-10-29 22:23:25+00:00): Hallo dirimwar, dies ist nur für die Dauer, dass der Radweg am Inn gesperrt ist. Solche befristeten Widmungen gehören eigentlich nicht in OSM.
dirimwar (2020-10-30 06:42:17+00:00): Ah, tut mir Leid, das war mir nicht bewusst. Reverted in CS#93271464.
Hungerburg (2020-10-30 20:57:50+00:00): Nichts für ungut, schon gar kein Grund für Leid.
PT-53 (2020-11-01 12:46:11+00:00): Hallo Arnuwan,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz dieses Straßenstück
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864699550/history#map=19/48.68243/9.37839
neu eingezeichnet, allerdings als "Zickzack-Straße", wie Du hier sehen kannst (voll reinzoomen):
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=93238769
Bitte achte künftig darauf, keine solche Zickzack zu erzeugen.
Grüße
user_5359 (2020-11-01 07:00:21+00:00): Hello! Please check the node http://www.osm.org/node/3906402246: What ist the meaning of the tags nq,eMlt=Tiryliai
nq,eMpl=Tyryle?
Jay May (2020-11-01 16:54:04+00:00): Ouuuuh! I see I had the wrong keyboard when I typed :D
It was supposed to be: "name:lt" and "name:pl", but looks like I had the wrong keyboard configured (French AZERTY instead of classical QWERTY).
Thanks for highlighting that. I will correct that in a few minutes
Basstoelpel (2021-07-27 13:27:59+00:00): Hallo Ana Luisa,

leider stellt StreetComplete per default nicht die richtigen Fragen an den Nutzer, wenn es um Hausnummern geht. Die zweite wichtige Frage ist nämlich: zu welcher Straße gehört das Gebäude. (PLZ und Stadt sind zwar auch interessant, die kann man aber meist aus den vorhandenen PLZ-Gebieten konstruieren.) Das ist in SC ein anderer quest.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=9.23743&lat=52.40552&zoom=12&overlays=street_not_found
Magst Du das alles selbst korrigieren? Am besten gehen Hausnummern mit JOSM und dem HouseNumberTaggingTool.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:13:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93239013
ElliottPlack (2020-11-10 15:31:46+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for the attempt here but the result has damaged the map in several data products that consume OSM data. While things look OK on the main map, the coastline is out of compliance. I would not recommend updating the OSM coastline in ID, due to its inability to really see the big picture. In particular, I've set up the Chesapeake Bay in a way that may not seem obvious, but is vetted by the local and global community. I see you're continuing to work in the area so I'd love to explain more and so you can better help on the project! Are you on the OSM US Slack?
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 14:18:34+00:00): I think you missed Sitio Kubuhan, I’ll add it in.
Greg_Rose (2020-10-30 22:52:39+00:00): Salut! Please do not create place names with all CAPITAL LETTERS. First letter of each word capitalized - that is all. 
DIALAYA -> non
Dialaya -> oui
Merçi!
Frans S (2020-10-29 14:12:02+00:00): Hello Hannes
Thanks for mapping here
A remark. There is no need to map terrain features, like woods and  farmland. These features has to be mapped outside the project. (now we are limited by the task square. On the map it is no sight)
Where paths are, you can expect buildings. Difficult to locate and identify. 
I mapped those where I am rather sure it are buildings
Best regards and keep mapping
chnav (2020-11-26 19:19:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, в этой правке вы без каких либо-оснований, подгоняя границу к непонятной схеме сельских округов, подвинули государственную границу на 1 КИЛОМЕТР.
chnav (2020-11-27 08:37:46+00:00): Сельские округа имеют admin_level=8, а не 7. Пожалуйста не используйте украинские соглашения в Казахстане.
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
Znaika (2023-12-14 17:04:07+00:00): Hallo,
Wieso Am Bingerhof 35 & 37 statt Lerchenweg und die Straße ist auch umbenannt???
Gruß,
Znaika
Znaika (2023-12-14 17:04:16+00:00): https://opendata.rhein-kreis-neuss.de/explore/dataset/rhein-kreis-neuss-strassenverzeichnis/map/?disjunctive.postleitzahl&disjunctive.stadtteil&disjunctive.strassenname&q=lerchenweg&refine.stadt_gemeinde=Kaarst&location=19,51.23217,6.59911&basemap=jawg.streets
Ropino (2023-12-14 19:37:22+00:00): Hi,
das ist ja schon ewig her... 

Schau mal hier:
https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_anzeigen?job_ids=45023&ausgabefarbig=true&linktyp=osmkartevoll&unterdrueckfertigestrassen=nein&unterdrueckspalten=nein&land=Bundesrepublik+Deutschland&stadt=Kaarst

Wenn es trotzdem falsch ein sollte: Fühl dich frei es zu korrigieren.
VG
Znaika (2023-12-15 18:01:26+00:00): Hi,
ich habe es zurück geändert. Es ist falsch auf regio-osm.de 
Ich weiss nicht, wie der Abgleich der Adressen stattfindet, wer das pflegt und so weiter. Ich kenne mich da nicht aus.
Es gibt so viele Fehler mit Hausnummerierung im Kataster.
Gruß, Z