piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DankJae (2022-01-07 18:10:22+00:00): Noswaith dda,

I will go through the list again, maybe one or two names in the database I do not recognise as a local, (namely Plas Madog, which although reverts the anglicisation of -dog like in Porthmadog, I rarely hear it over Plas Madoc). Many of these places lack a sign (although they may share a road name), so opted to use external sources for their names, particularly for Welsh.

Diolch, Jay
DankJae (2022-01-07 18:11:14+00:00): I'd like to add, in terms of Bettisfield, local signage I see does not use "Llys Bedydd" just Bettisfield (even alongside bilingual street and warning signs) I rarely find sources for "Llys Bedydd" (with ones found either based on Wikipedia or very historical sources), that Wicipedia gives no sources for the name. The nearby SAC is translated to Bettisfield in Welsh (except WCBC which uses both B'field and L'ydd in Welsh, but they couldn't translate "street"). External sources say "Llyn Bedydd" is used mainly for a lake, and "Llys Bedydd" for an old hall nearby. However, if local Welsh speakers use the name, I'll be happy to or won't oppose a revert.

Many thanks, Jay
trigpoint (2022-01-07 18:28:10+00:00): My source is the sign outside the church, it is reasonably local to me as I am in neighbouring Wem 
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7063498

Diolch Phil
DankJae (2022-01-07 18:46:08+00:00): Ah, very well, I'll revert it

Diolch, Jay
leo-xclnc (2021-12-27 21:21:21+00:00): Danke fürs korrigieren. Mir ist es leider nicht aufgefallen. Für die nächsten Bänke mache ich es richtig.
fabiotofy (2021-12-26 09:24:07+00:00): super! operativo anche per Santo Stefano :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115379509
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 23:35:15+00:00): Hey, ich finde den Changesetkommentar hier leider wenig aussagekräftig, könntest du da vielleicht in Zukunft drauf anchten? Danke im voraus!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Scalarik (2021-12-29 14:44:46+00:00): Hei,

Millä perusteella Syväkiventie on nyt tertiary, eikä enää secondary?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-01 12:48:17+00:00): This is using custom SC version, right?

Is "StreetComplete 39.0-alpha" some custom version formatting?

(I ask as I am trying to make statistics about quests and StreetComplete 39.0-alpha version string is unusual - though I also see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115427614 using it, so maybe it is not divergence of your fork?)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-01 12:50:24+00:00): though it seems that v39.0-alpha1 is also not tagged in repo, which may confuse my parser.
Matija Nalis (2022-07-03 17:30:55+00:00): yes, it is likely from my fork; as it does not change anything specific about the version there. It gets based around upstream master when I pull it, which is probably not at exact release versions in upstream. The version string `39.0-alpha` seems to be introduced in this upstream commit - https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/commit/3f32f2086a6f1f3750de539afec62573ed564051 so my fork was based on some upstream SC version after that (and at or before my version https://github.com/mnalis/StreetComplete/commit/fde68869a8a538c68b785fe2706f863f90bb11e4)
BaboucheVerte (2022-02-07 21:54:12+00:00): Salut ! J'avais mis des notes pour refaire la zone, et j'attendais une imagerie plus récente pour le faire. Quelle imagerie as-tu utilisé ? Je vois toujours les anciennes installations :( Merci !
Clem0908 (2022-02-08 19:35:23+00:00): Salut :) Alors je n'ai utilisé aucune imagerie et j'ai fait ça "à la main", je ne sais pas si c'est une bonne manière de faire mais j'ai pensé que ça serait utile quand même :)
BaboucheVerte (2022-02-10 23:32:14+00:00): ok, super ! t'as un bon recepteur GPS du coup ! :)
Je laisse les notes pour moi et pour y re jeter un coup d’œil quand l'imagerie sera màj. Bonne cartographie, à+
luja (2021-12-27 15:27:25+00:00): Danke, dass es jetzt drin ist.
Mautbruecken sind auch Kennzeichenleser, und wer nicht getrackt werden will muss diese umfahren ...
jengelh (2021-12-27 16:06:41+00:00): ... aber Hauptsache, man hat in der Note gelästert 🤦 ...
luja (2021-12-28 07:57:40+00:00): Nun, es gibt einige Leute, die sich weigern Blitzer einzutragen, die ich auf die schnelle mit street complete gemeldet habe weil die "der Verkehrssicherheit dienen" !!1 und die note schließen.
Dann trägt man es eben selbst ein.
So kommt das zustande....

Es wird immer mehr Repression ausgerollt: 
Infrarot-Kennzeichenleser an Bundesstrassen, Autobahnen, Dual Use der Mautdaten (jeder der an der Mautbrücke/Säule vorbeifährt wird erstmal erfasst auf den untersten Schichten des Systems, und da kann man leicht logs ziehen, und das wird garantiert gemacht)
Und da ich der Meinung bin, das das Volk sich solcher Spionage entziehen können muss, wenn es das fallweise will, sind exakte Daten zur Kennzeichenüberwachung wichtig für die Reiseplanung -Stichwort Verbotene/Gefährliche Orte- und man fährt eben einen wohlgeplanten "Umweg".

Wer z.B. in der Schweiz mal etwss zu schnell gefahren ist, weil er unachtsam dem Tempomaten vertraut hat, freut sich über jeden POI zu "Gefahrenstellen" vom gesparten Geld ist locker ein Smartfon oder Tablet von Samsung oder einem anderen "Premiumhersteller" drin.

Daher habe ich hier "allergisch" reagiert.
Es würde much freuen, wenn andere auch Kennzeichenleser, Blitzer, Überwachungskameras und andere Überwachungsgeräte melden und mappen würden
Soetwas ist wichtiger als die Frage ob eine Parkbank ein Dach hat.
highflyer74 (2022-06-10 05:02:31+00:00): Moin! Ein kurzer Hinweis: Da im Gewerkschaftshaus die Gewerkschaften einzeln gemappt sind (als office=union) macht es keinen Sinn, dem Gebäude ein office=ngo hinzuzufügen, da dies das Gebäude zu einer eigenen Einrichtung macht, was es ja nicht ist.

Nicht böse sein, aber das habe ich entsprechend wieder entfernt. Trotzdem danke für das Update der Gewerkschaften :-)

Gruss aus HB!
915 (2022-06-10 05:38:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
BeKri (2021-12-30 08:50:52+00:00): Servus XXXVII,
ich kann Deine Änderungen nicht nachvollziehen.
Warum löscht Du den Zugang zu 17 und 17 a raus ??
XXXVII (2021-12-30 14:27:58+00:00): Der Pfad, so wie er eingezeichnet war, existiert nicht. Auch wurde der Eindruck erweckt, dass es der Zugang zu Hausnummer 19 und 19a ist, was jedoch durch einen Zaun verhindert wird. Der jetzt bestehende Pfad ist daher meiner Meinung nach völlig ausreichend.
BeKri (2022-01-10 06:10:03+00:00): Ich bin sehr wohl der Meinung,
das es den Pfad gibt, wie sollen 17 und 17a sonst zu ihren Eingängen kommen ?
Den Zaun solltst Du Dir genauer ansehen, mach Dir bitte ein wirkliches Bild von der Situation vor Ort und ändere es bitte entsprechend.
user_8101879 (2022-01-06 19:09:09+00:00): Hi, I think you should learn about mapping : to put type=boundary instead of type=multipolygon is a very bad thing.
Read this before to continue your works :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Best regards
Dimitar155 (2022-01-01 10:36:48+00:00): Здравейте,
И добре дошли в OpenStreetMap. Благодарим Ви за редакцията, но моля имайте предвид, че имената на улиците се изписват без "ул." и без кавички. Ако е име на булевард се изписва "бул. Васил Левски" (без кавичките). Ако имате някакви въпроси може да ми пишете (https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Dimitar155) или да погледнете уики страницата на проекта (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria).

Поздрави,
Димитър
ivanbranco (2021-12-26 12:16:17+00:00): Ciao Marcello, ci sono un paio di errori secondo me. I tag image=* e website=* contengono siti non raggiungibili. name:etymology=* implica la presenza di un tag name=*.

Ma il problema più grande secondo me è il fatto che di ventuno changeset commentati con gente che ti chiedeva motivazioni a varie modifiche non hai mai risposto nemmeno una singola volta: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5188894
Marcello Rolli (2021-12-27 18:43:18+00:00): Ciao, ti ho risposto con la email così come ho sempre fatto. Non vedo le mie spisgazioni im OSM ....evidentemente  commetto qualche errore! Il nodo di cui parli non è mio qualcuno era intervenuto e ho fatto un ripristino ma non è mio e il trappeto in oggetto insiste nel perimetro della masseria nei locali sottostanti per cui quel nodo non avrebbe senso ma ,ripeto, non è mio.
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 18:52:25+00:00): Ma i tag image=* e website=* li hai inseriti tu. Website è un sito non raggiungibile, image ha una sintassi scorretta, potrebbe essere https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1EpBsZkwv2_KtsHTEhVCGbvlPGJcbmPHm ma una volta cliccato Drive dice che "È necessaria l'autorizzazione di accesso". Andrebbero linkato immagini di libero accesso. Io eliminerei entrambi i tag non essendo accessibili.
Carto'Cité (2022-01-10 22:47:25+00:00): Bonjour Denis.
Tu as une raison particulière pour enlever railway=station de plusieurs gares, par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3571215393 ?
Si tu ajoutes une emprise c'est plutôt public_transport=station qu'il faut enlever du point de gare, pour le mettre sur l'emprise surfacique.
Merci, Antoine.
Denis_Helfer (2022-01-11 06:17:44+00:00): Salut Antoine,
Désolé. A force de sillonner la France ferroviaire et voir des pratiques différentes il n'est pas impossible que j'ai supprimé des choses en trop. Il faut que je me fasse un modèle. Si tu savais les horreurs que je croise parfois.....
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-26 11:33:44+00:00): Ten obszar reprezentuje brukowaną nawierzchnię Rynku i ta edycja niestety nie jest poprawna

- nie jest pod budynkami (ani nad nimi), budynki są z niego wycięte. Zobacz np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23256528 - Sukiennice są w roli inner w tej relacji czyli są wycięte z tego obszaru. -1 jest zbędne lub błędne

- jest dla pieszych z pewnymi wyjątkami, highway=pedestrian jest uzasadnione. Dodam vehicle=private i bicycle=yes jak jeszcze nie ma.

Ta edycja niestety pogarsza dane bo kasuje informacje o brukowanej nawierzchni Rynku.

A jakie nawigacje nie działają? Mogę pomóc zgłosić problem do ich autorów (jeśli nawigacja nie jest rozwijana to nie pomoże to, ale może ta problematyczna martwa nie jest)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-26 11:36:23+00:00): Jak podasz dokłądnie która nawigacja nie działa i w jaki sposób nie działa to może uda się to poprawić.

Dodam że ta edycja na nawigacje by nie wpłynęła.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-26 12:09:28+00:00): Ale wielkie dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi na problem tutaj!

Poprawiłem część budynków i zgłosiłem https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21711 https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21710 https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21712

Część budynków rzeczywiście jest do poprawy - ale to trzeba zmienić geometrie a nie zaznaczać że Rynek jest pod budynkiem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-29 12:36:32+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=850502#p850502 ? W końcu zaczał się komunikować, są nawet jakieś argumenty (linkuje do podsumowania tego co na razie było)
fabiotofy (2021-12-26 11:34:39+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Per mappare dei dettagli così di precisione non fidarti delle foto aeree di Bing. Sono molto scadenti. Installati sul PC il programmino JOSM e quindi prova ad utilizzare le ultime TRUE-ORTOFOTO della Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115382919
RiccardoGalla (2021-12-26 15:58:55+00:00): Ciao! Grazie mille, era proprio quello che cercavo per migliorare. Per adesso siccome vivo in questa zona, mi sono dedicato a sistemare un po' di strutture che conosco, ma in effetti le foto di Bing non aiutano
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115382919
fabiotofy (2021-12-26 16:11:50+00:00): Di niente. Su talk it fvg trovi altre istruzioni utili su come aggiungere le ortofoto in josm https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-fvg/2021-October/001847.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115382919
maraf24 (2022-01-17 11:00:12+00:00): Skąd te aed się wzięły?
Tag fixme wprost wskazuje, że nie są z surveya.
charl3s (2022-01-17 12:40:48+00:00): Critffos kiedyś kilka podesłał
maraf24 (2022-01-17 13:16:38+00:00): To jest kopia jakiejś wątpliwej bazy.
Tutaj nie ma aed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9366885740
archie (2021-12-26 12:04:05+00:00): Hej, är det frågan om parkering "rooftop" med tanke på tillägget "layer=1" som du förde in? I så fall bör väl "parking=multi-storey" bytas ut till "parking=rooftop" Annars gör "layer=1" väl ingen mening?
Lucarion (2021-12-28 23:58:57+00:00): Cykelparkeringen ligger i marknivå, så min tanke var att layer=1 krävdes för att parkeringshuset skulle hamna "ovanpå" cykelparkeringen, om det låter vettigt?
archie (2021-12-29 03:50:24+00:00): Om parkeringen (inte cykelpark) får layer=1, så exkluderar det parkering på default-layer, dvs 0. Och då är det tveksamt om multistorey bör användas. Det är klart att parkeringen kan vara på flera plan ovanför default-plan, men inte på själva default-planen. Men frågan är om man inte skall använda "level" om man vill differentiera mellan olika plan. För mig verkar layer=1 och multistorey  utesluta varandra och layer=1 mera tyda på att parkeringen är på toppen av byggnaden. Men jag kan tänkas ha fel härutinnan. Skulle vara intressant att veta andras inställning till detta.
layer-tagget avser byggnaden. Om placeringen av cykelparkeringen inom byggnaden skall anges är väl level-tagget det  mest korrekta och inte layer-tagget (layer-tagget här använt på byggnaden, men refererande till cykelparkeringen) .
archie (2021-12-29 04:05:40+00:00): Vid ytterligare eftertanke tror jag att layer=1 taggningen gör byggnaden eller rättare parkeringen i byggnaden till en en-plans-företeelse. Om avsikten är att ange placeringen av cykelparkeringen inom byggnaden bör inte layer-tagget som avser byggnaden användas utan level-tagget på cykelparkeringen.
maraf24 (2021-12-27 19:46:59+00:00): Podobno wieża jest jakieś 80m na NE od tej pozycji.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2984596
user_4493657 (2021-12-28 16:12:56+00:00): Dzięki za informację poprawiłem.
ivanbranco (2021-12-26 11:52:17+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,

landuse=expo
name=VercelliFiere
tourism=attraction

io sarei per cambiare con: 
amenity=events_centre
name=VercelliFiere

perché landuse=expo ha un solo uso in tutto il database di OSM (questo) e anche definire questo posto un'attrazione turistica mi sembra azzardato.

La wiki di amenity=events_centre dice: "An events centre (events centerAE) is a large, multi-purpose building used to hold events, such as musical performances, exhibitions, conferences, and sporting events", mi sembra ci stia, tu cosa ne pensi?
Giovanni Frazese (2022-06-06 09:34:43+00:00): Landuse = expo non la conoscevo, attrazione turistica ci potrebbe stare per una fiera no ? Ma solo in assenza di un tag piu specifico. Non certo per il centro vaccinale (che peraltro ora non c'è neppure piu )
attili1 (2022-01-05 05:44:37+00:00): Hello Theary MORK,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap! While mapping in Cambodia we have observed that landuse=residential polygons were created as continuous polygon tracing each rooftop of the building with “ name=***. For best mapping practice we need to create an individual building polygon for every rooftop and tag “building=yes” refer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building for more information. 

And also would you mind sharing the source for adding “name” information to the landuse polygons and the geometry of the buildings does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and this should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

Please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ 


Happy Mapping!
Manoj.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115383543
archie (2021-12-26 12:14:24+00:00): Alltså jag har egentligen tidigare förespråkat att ha namn på platform (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182241687),  men anpassat mig till gängse praxis att ange i namn samma värde som i ref. Och så är det väl i de allra flesta hållplatserna (platform) i Västtrafik. Namnet på hållplatsen finns ju redan på "stop_position" och om man därtill även sätter namn på plattform kan det bli lite väl mycket.  Vilket skäl finns det att bryta med denna praxis?
archie (2021-12-26 12:51:04+00:00): Kolla här: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207460385/history. Även jag själv har det, men det bryter mot gängse praxis. Jag tänker återta min ändring (tillbaka till name=A)  här och på andra ställen där jag möjligtvis gjort samma sak. Eller finns det skäl att inte göra det?
archie (2021-12-26 13:06:09+00:00): Fan, jag har gjort det på flera ställen (som här: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207451325/history), men jag tror det är fel, i vart fall avviker det från hur andra har gjort. Någon fundering?
abakus_uploader (2021-12-26 23:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
edc22 (2021-12-28 10:14:43+00:00): Cała ta zmiana to jedna wielka fantazja i wandalizm. W tym miejscu nie ma żadnych sklepów, centrów handlowych, myjni, restauracji ani dróg i parkingów. Jest tam szczere pole. 
To już kolejny raz gdy użytkownik @Michał12328 wprowadzą nieistniejące obiekty. Zmiana w całości do wycofania.
maraf24 (2021-12-28 21:04:20+00:00): Wycofane.
edc22 (2021-12-28 21:26:01+00:00): Dziękuję.
Na mapillary dodałem aktualny przejazd obejmujący ten teren https://mapillary.com/map/im/2734484210190042
fghj753 (2021-12-26 12:27:58+00:00): Forgot to mention in description, but i also removed approx. 5000 nodes from ways with over 100 nodes, where gap between two nodes was less than 30 cm.
jmilot (2022-01-03 14:18:06+00:00): Hi, 

Why duplicating this cyclepath? The information is already contained in the way 176209977 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176209977). Notice its `cycleway:left|track` tags. 

Please, either 
(1) revert this change or 
(2) remove the duplicated information from way 176209977 and be careful to add the necessary connection to perpendicular streets in order to not break bike router.
Kovoschiz (2021-12-28 06:46:54+00:00): What's wrong with the building?
rjccviii (2024-01-21 04:57:01+00:00): whatever happened when this update was made, screwed up the location of my house in a lot of mapping software.
tuttiton (2024-01-22 23:06:57+00:00): are you sure this changeset is the problem? it was made 2 years ago and I'm reasonably sure I didn't touch the addresses. just added building footprints and changed the roads geometry slightly.
tuttiton (2024-01-22 23:21:44+00:00): you can seee actual changes from this changeset here https://osmcha.org/changesets/115385676/

I checked your change history and as far as I understand from it is that you're talking about this building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015680380

And indeed I added it 2 years ago. here https://osmcha.org/changesets/115401350/
but I'm pretty sure there was no addresses set before I added the building footprint.

I added footprints by aerial imagery and I have no knowledge of actual street addresses of the buildings I added. if you know these addresses you can add them yourself. 
If we're talking about your house, since there are townhouses then, I'd guess, it's better to either to split the building and add addresses for each part of it or add addresses as points
you're also very welcome to install https://streetcomplete.app/ app to your phone and add addresses to the buildings in your neighborhood
rjccviii (2024-01-28 22:03:25+00:00): Yo, thanks for responding! I've been doing some digging and checking, and I think there's a combination of factors that happened. I'd fixed this area in a bunch of maps years ago, but for some reason after the street was updated, a lot of maps pulled address info from...somewhere that still has the addresses missing and screwed it all up again.
tuttiton (2024-01-29 02:06:09+00:00): Ah ok. yeah I think some maps may be getting addresses from the public address database which has it incorrect for whatever reason. hopefully if you update it in OSM they'll switch to the correct ones (but it's not guaranteed).

just a heads up, I don't think it's a right approach to add name of the apartment complex/neighborhood to every building (not sure why it was done this way for some other buildings in vicinity)
I added name of the complex to the residential area instead (with web address) which I think should be enough
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015680373

Otherwise welcome to the OSM community you may find some information specific for Michigan here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
and if you feel like it there are also online meetups
Jakuje (2022-05-25 14:20:11+00:00): Ahoj, muzes prosim specifikovat zdroj informace, ze tento kus zeme se jmenuje "«Lednice»" a ze je to ostrov? Zdroj wikipedie neni relevantni a rychle hledani nenaslo ze by neco takoveho existovalo.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015435417
Michaela Kalandrová (2022-06-02 12:55:22+00:00): Dobrý den. Ostrovy jsou na Seznam ostrovů Česka (Wikipedie).
Jakuje (2022-06-02 18:17:28+00:00): Ano, ale «Lednice» neni nazev toho ostrova. Prosim, projdete si tu stranku celou: "U nepojmenovaných ostrovů [...] nebo největší sídlo v území (v dvojitých lomených závorkách).", takze zaznacit do mapy klidne, ale takoveto jmeno tam nema co delat.
michel60 (2024-04-15 17:16:59+00:00): Bonjour,
De préférence, il ne faut pas scinder les rond-point. Il faut l'inclure entier dans le lignes de bus (scinder les rond-point nécessite de vérifier la continuité de toutes les lignes de bus passant par ce rond-point => c'est fastidieux !!!
Le GPS fonctionne avec les rond-point entier => les lignes de BUS aussi
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-15 17:20:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Et pour vérifier la continuité et l'ordre des point-d'arrêt, (ligne de bus,train, tranway) utiliser GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.40911&lat=48.64901&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
- Ligne en vert => c'est ok
- Ligne en noir => c'est en erreur
- Cliquer sur le ligne pour voir l'erreur
Faites-en bon usage
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-15 17:21:18+00:00): P.S. GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector est mis à jour toutes les 13heures ...