piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dvdhoven (2022-06-07 17:15:34+00:00): Ik vermoed dat dat verificatiefouten van de wandelroutes zijn. Die kun je negeren.
In JOSM zit een standaard preset voor wandelroutes en de verificatie in JOSM kijkt naar die standaard preset. Alleen dekt die preset totaal niet wat er in wandelknooppuntroutes staat en dus krjg je allerlei verifcatiefouten, die je in feite kunt negeren.
Dat is iets wat je in de mind moet houden. In JOSM zitten veel standaard presets en er wordt gevalideerd tegen die presets.
Maar als die niet meer datgene dekken wat er nu speelt krijg je oneigenlijke verificatiefouten.
Bijv. die standaardpreset kent niet forward/backward voor rollen, wel vulcano en meer van dat soort dingen.
Ook mogen knopen geen lid zijn van de routes volgens die standaardpreset.
Dus negeer de verificatiefouten gewoon.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
archpdx (2022-06-02 02:31:17+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding your business to the map. Please note however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM: see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation

There should be a drop down of nearby streets when selecting the point you added in the web editor and clicking on the 'Street' box in the address field. This can save you some time and make sure the street name isn't abbreviated.

Ste. in the 'Unit' box should also be unabbreviated to Suite.
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-01 23:05:26+00:00): Did you *really* talk to your friend about adding some addresses here?
Entail5963 (2022-06-01 23:16:28+00:00): ✨Discord✨
Entail5963 (2022-06-01 23:23:24+00:00): Also to answer your question, more thorough, yes; that’s kinda how this works. I love to survey land, it’s kinda my friend groups hobby, we were “face timing” on discord, and sharing addresses whilst surveying on a notepad with a logging using JSON so yeah we do have a bunch of data, we have our own little data base (self hosted) on a raspberry pi I own. I hope this helped to clear things up.
eggie (2022-06-01 06:38:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aixbrick (2022-06-01 09:06:36+00:00): Hallo,
rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121801180. Das ist kein "Fahrrad-only Teil". Es gibt keine entsprechende Beschilderung (VZ 237) und auch die bauliche Gestaltung hat sich in keinster Weise geändert. Es wurde nur die vorhandene Straße abgepollert. Diese(r) Poller sind/ist in OSM erfasst und für das Routing vollkommen ausreichend.
Gruß
cserpell (2022-06-01 15:03:56+00:00): Hola, se te coló un copy paste:

building:levels	= Ruta D-337

jaja
felipeeugenio (2022-06-01 17:36:24+00:00): corregido. gracias
gscholz (2022-06-04 09:27:19+00:00): Hi VLD190,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding broken polygon relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=29.77251&lat=9.23599&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121786595

Can you please fix this?

May be you like to educate yourself first:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
VLD190 (2022-06-07 17:32:19+00:00): Hi Guido,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I went ahead and removed the way(1065727972) that I previously added from  changeset 121786595. The newest changeset is 122080732. 

Please  notify me if the problem persists, and I will further review the issue.

Best regards,
David
MxxCon (2022-06-01 03:57:08+00:00): Hello.
Satellite and streetside imagery doesn't show any traffic lights on node 597414727, yet you mapped it as such. Could you please elaborate on that change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121786682
streckenkundler (2022-08-29 17:13:25+00:00): Hei,

du hast hier für die komplette Draisinenstrecke an Zossen in Richtung Jüterbog railway=disused gesetzt. Für wenige Gleise in Bahnhofsbereichen mag das stimmen, aber nicht für alles!

Meiner Meinung nach ist es für die befahrenen Bereiche schlicht railway=rail + usage=tourism vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Gleis

Einige Abschnitte, wo z.B. die eine S-Bahn-Einheit steht, die Donnerbüchse (oder vergleichbar) und die beiden Weitstreckenwagen gehen in Richtung railway=preserved.

Wir sind heute von der Firma den Bereich Zossen - Sperenberg mit der Fahrraddraisine befahren... Diverse Nebengleise sind disused...  Das Gleis, das in den ehem. Kasernenbereich westlich Sperenberg ggeht, liegt auch noch, wir durften mit Haftungsverzucht offiziell auf das Gelände.

Ich werde das nach und nach ändern.
Sven
null_l3 (2022-06-01 12:22:40+00:00): it's not arabian gulf !!
how you make this name?
how you translate persian gulf to this?
user_3022894 (2022-06-01 20:01:03+00:00): Hi Bienson,
vielleicht weißt du es schon, bezüglich des kleinen Trafohäuschens wollte ich dir nur gern folgenden Hinweis geben:

Die kleinen Trafohäuschen bzw. Umspannstationen, die eigentlich kein wirkliches Gebäude sind (da nicht mannshoch, reingehen kann man ja nicht :)),
kannst du statt building=service auch mit man_made=street_cabinet + street_cabinet=power taggen.
( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet#Street_cabinet_categories )
Dann ist es eher als "Schrank/Schaltschrank" als als Gebäude eingeordnet.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Bienson (2022-07-01 02:58:27+00:00): Okay, das wusste ich nicht - trage solche "Schaltschränke" eigtl. nicht ein. Sieht aber recht groß aus auf dem Luftbild, wahrscheinlich müsste man vor Ort checken, ob es betretbar ist.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-01 01:40:12+00:00): Estou conferindo as alterações que você fez aqui, você deletou uma grande construção e adicionou algumas como esta que parece não existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065730876 
e deletou uma que parecia existir (está em vermelho neste link: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121787012 com base em que fez estas alterações?
Falsernet (2022-06-04 21:09:34+00:00): Does this junction not qualify as a roundabout? According to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations), the presence of traffic lights doesn't impact whether or not it is considered a roundabout according to OSM standards.
MacLondon (2022-06-05 03:48:22+00:00): Traffic on the approach roads do have right-of-way when they have a green signal at this junction and traffic on the "roundabout" have to give way to them (at their red signal). Therefore this is not a junction=roundabout.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular:

"The tag junction=circular is used only on road intersections where traffic on the junction does NOT have COMPLETE right of way."

"Where traffic on a circular junction itself does have complete right of way, this is a roundabout. The tag junction=roundabout should be used on roundabouts."

At https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout:

"A roundabout is a... road junction where the traffic on the roundabout has ALWAYS right of way."

It mention, "There CAN be traffic light, as long as the circular road has right-of-way". In other words, if there were only 'non-junction' traffic signals on a roundabout (e.g. for a pelican crossing), then it would still be a junction=roundabout.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-01 22:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MxxCon (2022-06-01 03:47:21+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Look at the satellite imagery, it doesn't look there's any traffic lights here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121787565
Noen (2022-06-01 18:04:48+00:00): 👍
Hannah Piggen (2022-06-01 15:46:16+00:00): You've forgotten to tag the ways 106573737{7-9}
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-31 23:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121788169 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting another contribution by the Detroit Doodler.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-01 00:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121788341 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting more contributions by the Detroit Doodler.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-31 23:47:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 121787918.
bigpp_dot_com (2022-05-31 23:51:55+00:00): fuck you
bigpp_dot_com (2022-05-31 23:51:59+00:00): jk
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-01 04:20:46+00:00): Reviewed.  Looks good.

Welcome to OSM.  Let me know if you have any questions.  I encourage you to join the OSM Discord!
lyctkel (2022-06-26 15:25:09+00:00): Xin chào BanTayXinh, từ những gì tôi thấy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065744374 không phải là một tòa nhà. Tôi đề nghị loại bỏ building = tháp_bút cạnh tranh.
-------------------
Hi BanTayXinh, 
from what I an see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065744374 is not a building. I suggest to remove building=tháp_bút competly.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-01 00:01:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 121788163, 121788198.
wireguy (2022-06-06 20:28:58+00:00): boopington,  lots of deletes here.  seems to have broken the wood relation 6250489.  Can you take a look and correct?
user4816003805 (2022-06-26 07:06:32+00:00): Hi Mingwei,

The node you deleted had address information attached to it. Is Eatsa now vacant? Rather than deleting the whole node, it's usually better to tagged it as disused (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop).
This way, we don't lose address positions, and also mappers can be later prompted by StreetComplete to add a new shop when one appears (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/Quests#cite_ref-:26_47-0).

Let me know if it's vacant and I'll resurrect the deleted node.
Thanks!
Mingwei (2022-06-29 20:58:30+00:00): Oops! I assumed the building outline had the address information. I'm not sure if it is vacant (probably is), but I do know that Eatsa is no more.
user4816003805 (2022-06-30 04:44:14+00:00): No problem. I undeleted the address node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123026293.
I marked it as vacant, but put a "fixme" tag to check it.
Thanks for the info!
mariotomo (2022-06-01 00:55:20+00:00): https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/16/f4/d9/b3/20190325-180532-largejpg.jpg
Marek-M (2022-06-02 08:25:05+00:00): Hej, Plac Dworcowy jako highway=tertiary, to chyba za wysoka kategoria dla tej drogi. Wydaje mi się, że highway=service byłby wystarczający. Ta droga nie ma żadnego udziału w komunikacji drogowej, jest to tylko dojazd do dworca.
Marek-M (2022-06-02 08:42:44+00:00): Jakby co, to obniżyłem kategorię drogi dla Placu Dworcowego - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121840945
fuchspl (2022-06-02 11:30:05+00:00): Nie będę protestował :) Wartość tertiary pochodziła z tagu construction=tertiary, a przed przebudową było highway=tertiary.
Marek-M (2022-06-02 11:32:35+00:00): Super, właśnie też w historii widziałem, że od zawsze jest to droga tertiary ale wg mnie i mojego rozumienia wiki było to nieprawidłowe rozwiązanie.
Marek-M (2022-06-02 11:34:52+00:00): A jeszcze jedno pytanie mam - wg https://nadmorski24.pl/aktualnosci/54374-koniec-z-utrudnieniami-w-chyloni-wezel-juz-gotowy otwarty został również parking podziemny ale dojazdy do niego zostawiłeś jako construction. Czyżby jednak parking nie był jeszcze gotowy?
fuchspl (2022-06-02 11:50:33+00:00): Zgadza się. Na wjeździe stoi nadal metalowe ogrodzenie. Artykuł zresztą mówi: "Przebudowany plac przed budynkiem dworca kolejowego doczekał się podziemnego parkingu na 140 samochodów. Ma zostać oddany kierowcom w najbliższych tygodniach"
Zdjęcie z 31 maja: https://api.sports-tracker.com/apiserver/v1/image/scale/629606afc7da78036130f9f5.jpg?width=2000&height=2000&fit=true
Marek-M (2022-06-02 12:04:33+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi - nie ma to jak wczytać się dokładnie w artykuł :)
Ygramul (2022-09-16 20:22:46+00:00): Warum ist hier der Grasige Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33971797) von highway=residential zu highway=unclassified geändert worden? Wenn ich da so durchfahre, wirkt der Teil zumindest eher wie eine Anliegerstraße.
berjk (2023-01-08 17:47:08+00:00): Habe den Weg auf unclassied geändert, da dieser im weiteren Verlauf durch ein Industriegebiet führt.
Vor Ort habe ich dies nicht bewertet.
Ygramul (2023-01-08 19:20:18+00:00): Der erste Teil im Osten Richtung Westen macht vor Ort halt sehr einen normalen Wohnstraßeneindruck. Ab da, wo er schmaler gerendert wird, ist es ohnehin highway=service und entsprechend ausgeschildert. Ab da wo der Bus abbiegt (Felix-Wankel-Str.), sollte es aber eigentlich highway=track sein, denke ich ...
berjk (2023-01-09 08:58:41+00:00): track ist eigentlich eine Straße die überwiegend von Traktoren benutzt wird. Ich klinke mich nun aus der Diskussion aus.
wireguy (2022-06-01 18:18:43+00:00): Hi darkcave, Welcome to OSM!  thanks for fixing the street name, and the other updates in the area.   Let me know if you have any q's.
bxl-forever (2022-06-01 07:34:07+00:00): Hello,

If you want to import ref numbers for the T-bus service, I request that you do not erase valid ref numbers for the tram stops, as you did here.

Despite the tram is temporarily not operated here, it should remain untouched on OSM: OpenStreetMap is not (solely) a map for day-to-day status of the network but we offer a view about the normal situation as well.
Tchet (2022-06-01 12:19:18+00:00): Ok, I do start to understands your complaints about the GTFS, from my point of view it's a mistake that temporarily not used stops suddenly disapear.
Can you describre the systemic quirks of this file on OSM Wiki and explain to avoid such pitfall ? I will try to get the file improved.
(If you want) You can also add comments & requests for fixup on stops that can be retrieved with overpass turbo; not to clutter the wiki.
felipeeugenio (2022-06-01 20:57:11+00:00): Hola
A qué te refieres con "This bus stop could be redundant".
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121789338
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-01 08:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121799631 where the changeset comment is: Reverting another doodle near Detroit by sockpuppet of previously-blocked user.
joost schouppe (2023-03-27 09:43:26+00:00): geen issues gezien met de turn restrictions hier (check nav van je opmerking in maproulette)
Kovoschiz (2022-06-01 08:54:58+00:00):  `vehicle=bus` is not valid. Please fix your application to accept `bus=`.
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 08:21:13+00:00): 修改集已退回
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121790064
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:35:50+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎確認
MxxCon (2022-06-01 03:59:50+00:00): Does this change anything on the map?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121790249
IsStatenIsland (2022-06-06 00:55:14+00:00): Nope, but it will most likely mean demolition 

I'll follow the case to see if the property gets seized (very likely)
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:55:16+00:00): 修改集已退回
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:33:22+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎
alessandrocarmeli (2022-06-04 09:46:39+00:00): attenzione, non aggiungere le relazioni nelle stop position per evitare duplicati
cocoasin (2022-06-01 09:22:34+00:00): 我更改的没错，其他市县道都是次要道路。而且我依照天地图·山东给的数据更改。
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:57:44+00:00): 修改集已退回
Yunzhi (2022-06-07 01:48:22+00:00): Herman Lee, 你好，

关于这个市的“name：zh-Hant”， 根据wikipedia， https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9C%AC%E5%BA%84%E5%B8%82， 似乎“本庄市” 比较合适。 你认为呢？
Herman Lee (2022-06-07 06:23:15+00:00): 通：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121802022
VLD547 (2022-06-09 03:13:34+00:00): 感謝建議，同「土庄町」的討論，我們認為對於 zh-hant 來說，「本庄市」會是比較好的選擇。
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 08:03:53+00:00): 修改集已退回
VLD547 (2022-06-16 06:24:11+00:00): Update the name to use "庄", specify in the changeset comment that the update is based discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121802022, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121791800
VLD547 (2022-06-16 07:41:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121802022, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121791800

根據先前的討論串，將 zh-hant 改回「庄」字。
willkmis (2022-06-01 15:47:29+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure of the tags you've added here. "Operator" is for the company that operates the lot, not a description. So in this case, it might be the City of Los Angeles, or maybe a contractor. Also, what currency is this charge in? I'd be surprised if the fee to park in a public lot was not in US dollars.
MxxCon (2022-06-04 03:29:46+00:00): This own this "property" in upland nft/cryptocurrency game and they are vandalizing OSM to increase value of their property in that game. This and all their other edits should be reverted.
willkmis (2022-06-10 15:29:10+00:00): This comment hasn't yet received a response @Avasquez, what source did you have in making these changes?
Avasquez369 (2022-06-10 19:18:53+00:00): I designated the property as a parking lot because that's what it is. But, after reviewing your rules and regulations, I will no longer submit changes unless they are identified as such. 
 
Please Note:  I do not speak for Upland, But, as you know everything Mxxcon states is a direct reflection of the OpenStreetMap (OSM) company name.  These Slanderest rude statements are recorded on the worldwide web and can be seen by Upland and their potential players. Please ask him to stop, or, I will address this issue directly with Upland, themselves.  Defamation of the Upland Name, by openly calling 99% of their players, vandals, and treating them as such, could lead to problems for OSM.  I also suggest OSM not take his stance and openly allow his slander of the Upland Name, or anyone else for that matter. Mind you, Upland has 240,000+ players of which 45,000 play daily. It is the fastest growing Metaverse in the world and many of the players are adult professionals like Doctors, Attornies, real estate agents, and Not Vandals.  Upland is a Real Estate and Business website, not a bunch of kids.  
You guys have a great company and provide a great service, but, If allowed his actions by Defaming the Upland Name, and their players can be seen as OSM point of view.  Besides, it's not very professional and could possibly lead to legal action by Upland themselves. 
Again, I am asking OSM directly, to please stop Him from making faulty accusations and to keep his feelings to himself. 
Better yet, being that there are others complaining about his rudeness, why take the risk?
clay_c (2022-06-10 19:31:04+00:00): Actually, we would appreciate it if you addressed this issue directly with Upland. Perhaps they could do something about the huge influx of new users like you who insist on adding low-quality fictional data.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-10 19:32:18+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a volunteer project, not a company.
MxxCon (2022-06-10 19:33:39+00:00): First of all OSM is not a company and I'm not its employee, so your threats are empty.
But, oh please, do take it up with Upland. They would very much love to hear how their own users are sabotaging Upland project by adding copyrighted data to OSM which then gets imported into Upland. Upland would love to have to fight a copyright lawsuit against Google, Yelp and Yahoo. Please, do tell them everything that was going on. Please also tell them how you intentionally create wrong tags and map non-existing features.
And I'll just put these 2 links here for easy reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
willkmis (2022-06-10 21:56:42+00:00): I went ahead and deleted this parking lot node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122229941. The node was extraneous since the parking lot was already mapped as an area anyway.
willkmis (2022-06-10 22:05:37+00:00): All of us are volunteers, and we welcome edits to the project that are from legitimate sources and improve the quality of OSM data. However, a number of players from your game have been recently making low quality edits, often apparently using sources from whom we do not have permission to copy. So the OSM community is quickly becoming suspicious of these sorts of edits. Please use care to learn and follow our guidelines in any future mapping, even if it slows your progress/cash flow in your game.
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 00:26:30+00:00): Willkmis, I understand and I appreciate your professional explanation and request. All I asked was to refrain from name-calling and insulting people, regardless of where they come from. OSM is owned by a 'Company' that cares about abuse, from both sides and is investigating my complaint. As mentioned before, I will identify properties per the rules and regulations as required by OSM. But I also ask that the OSM community to be professional (most are) and follow the rules of, OSM. This may be a silly question, but, does OSM (Gandi) allow rude insults and name-calling by volunteers?  If so, then my thought of starting a discord channel would be fruitless. My thought was to ask players to submit their requests for my review, In hopes to lessen the load, by making sure changes are correct and per OSM rules and regulations. Needless to say, I am retired, so I have time to volunteer on this end.  But, I do not want to bother, if, careless volunteers like Mxxcon continues to be rude and unprofessional. Grant it, I can't stop all bad intentions, just like you can't, but, maybe I can help, by educating and posting OSM rules and regulations, And reviewing change requests, before it they even hit the OSM community. 

Please note, as far as I understand, someday soon, The metaverse web3, will not use your titles for their properties, because, their own buildings and advertisers on those buildings will replace, OSM titles, hopefully soon.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-11 00:36:05+00:00): @Avasquez369, OSM isn't owned by a company, it's owned by a non-profit foundation which leaves the day-to-day operations to volunteers, including the frustrated ones on this thread that have seen an influx of Upland users making unwelcome edits.

OSM is a serious project to create a free map of the world with accurate and real-world information.  The fact that games or metaverses or whatever use this data is interesting for sure, but ultimately the goal is creating a map.

To that end, we welcome contributions that make the map better, provided that the contributions are accurate and come from sources compatible with our license.  This means that NO copying from Google, Yelp, etc. sources are permitted.  This is very important because copyright claims are a significant risk to the project.
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 00:50:34+00:00): Oh, one more thing, this is not my game, I am not affiliated with Upland, other than playing the game. My only concern is disrespect from volunteers. This continued even after I apologized and told Mxxcon I understand now and would not do this anymore. As your own community stated, give the new people a chance to learn and warn them as required, not insulting them. Please review my request and you'll see they all took place in a very short time period. Needless to say, those were my very first uneducated, and misinformed submittals. but I've learned.