piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
christopherwinkler (2018-12-04 16:55:17+00:00): Hallo Sven, 

danke für Deine freundliche Reaktion. Da ich extrem unsicher war, hab ich das Häkchen an "bitte kontrollieren" gesetzt.
Nutze seit Monaten gerne und Dankbar die WanderReitkarte, weil dort die meisten Wanderwege bereits eingezeichnet sind. Großartig! Vor kurzem habe ich gesehen, dass man sich im Kartenausschnitt eingetragene Wanderwege auch rausfiltern lassen kann und dann mit etwas Gefummel als GPS runterladen. Grandios!

Auf derselben Seite gab es auch eine Erklärung, wie man das machen kann, die aber leider nicht alle meine Fragen beantwortet hat. Ich war ziemlich überrascht, als ich merkte, dass man das Stück für Stück machen muss und überfordert, als ein fixierter Streckenabschnitt länger ging als ich ihn haben wollte.

Muss noch lernen, werde aber gern mehr beitragen, da ich in der Gegend viel unterwegs bin und mir schon viele fehlende Wege aufgefallen sind. Im gegebenen Fall dachte ich, kein großes Unheil anrichten zu können, da ich keinen Weg als solchen falsch eintragen kann, sondern nur einen nicht existenten Wanderpfad obendrauflege, der größtenteils stimmen sollte und einen jedenfalls sicher hin und zurückbringt :-).

Zur konkreten Frage: Der Urstromtalweg ist extrem schlecht bis gar nicht beschildert mit dem gelben Punkt. Ich habe auch nirgendwo außer bei Outdooractive etwas darüber gefunden, aber es gibt ihn. Was den Verlauf am Rande des Friedhofs angeht, so ist dieser tatsächlich ausgeschildert mit dem gelben Punkt. Es ist auch der einzige Weg, den man hinunterkommt, wenn man nicht die Bundesstraße gehen will oder die Schlittenwiese runterlaufen, wo es eigentlich keinen Weg gibt.

In der Relation 8420865 (geht sowas automatisch??) macht der Weg am Frauenberg eine Runde ... die bin ich so nicht gelaufen und habe ich auch nicht so eingetragen. Da gibt es aber einen kurzen Rundweg, der glaube ich Frauenbergweg oder so ähnlich heißt. Kann ich beim nächsten Mal gerne schauen.

Was etwas blöd ist, ist die kurze Franze oben auf dem Weinberg. Eingezeichnet ist der Weg bis zur B96 und dann wieder zurück. Das habe ich nicht anders hingekriegt, weil das ständig in Autoergänzung kam, ist aber natürlich Bullshit. Keine Ahnung, wie man das anders machen kann.

Danke jedenfalls nochmal für Deine geduldige und freundliche Hilfe. Ich bleibe dran und wenn ich etwas Zeit habe, lese ich mich ein, um da mehr beitragen zu können.

Besten Gruß
Christopher (Baruth)
DD1GJ (2018-12-06 07:13:09+00:00): Alles gelöscht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65105739
trigpoint (2018-12-03 12:40:45+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit and for updating OSM. 
Just a couple of quick questions
1. Were there diversion notices
2. Did the 'new' route have the new orange waymarks in place?
Cheers Phil
db8 (2018-12-03 19:23:32+00:00): Hi Phil,
1. I didn't see any diversion notices.
2. The  "new" route has the new orange Shropshire Way waymarks in place.
3. The changes to the route are recent ones. I did a walk on Saturday with someone who is on the committee of the Shropshire Way association and that is how I knew the route had been changed as they pointed out the changes to me. The changes had been discussed with the landowner and council member and been updated v.quickly. As a result I thought I would have a go at updating OSM. I used the track information from my mobile phone app.
Cheers,
Dave.
P.S. It was my first OSM edit so I hope it is OK!
db8 (2018-12-03 20:11:04+00:00): I have realised I also needed to change the route of the Shropshire way south so that the bit of road which is no longer part of the route is removed. I have now done this now.
See Changeset: 65137574
trigpoint (2018-12-03 22:57:32+00:00): Thank you for that information, your edit was great please do keep adding to OSM. It was just seeing changes to the Shropshire Way which caused concern and whether they were known about.
Cheers Phil
db8 (2018-12-04 14:06:50+00:00): Thanks for your encouraging comment  Phil, much appreciated. I will put a note in the changeset comment next time with as much info as I know about the change and include any diversion notice or Shropshire Way orange waymarkers I see.
Cheers,
Dave.
Vinicius   Sisoto (2018-12-07 21:46:54+00:00): aIemenezes
mueschel (2018-12-05 11:54:45+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier einige "destination" Tags gesetzt, z.B. "destination:to:ref:lanes:backward".
Üblicherweise heißt das Tag 
"destination:ref:to:lanes:backward", d.h. das ":to" kommt nach dem Subkey ":ref".

Würdest du da mal drüberschauen?

Danke, Jan
JochenB (2018-12-05 22:49:51+00:00): Danke Jan, 
hab den Dreher beseitigt.
Grüße,
Jochen
awesm (2019-01-23 06:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66557476 where the changeset comment is: revert pointless/careless edits based on imagery around Lyttelton, New Zealand
viloan (2018-12-03 02:05:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 14:39:10+00:00): Same here, do we really need 10 (!) decimal places for the height of a building?
freebeer (2018-12-03 15:47:04+00:00): i have a problem with this,

did you obtain permission from contributor MintCondition before deleting her/his row of buildings at the north of this changeset added less than a year ago?

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65110474

ignore me if you have; i offered my tracings for sacrifice to the miami import out of principle.

as these are mostly minimal improvements, rather than deleting the buildings and losing the history that MintCondition contributed to osm here, it would have been better to merge the imported geometry with the original building's history out of respect for fellow mappers.

otherwise we may as well set up 0pen5treetMap exclusively populated with official data and delete all other pesky user contributions.

thanks.
patricknoll_import (2018-12-03 22:35:19+00:00): this import has been officially announced for 3 weeks with the data available. It's been disclosed for 8 months with data available.

height can be mass edited down to fewer decimal places as only data from this import used it.

I checked MintCondition's traces before importing and the data I imported is not a minor improvement.  The traces were often inaccurate, simplified and did not include addresses.

That said, I will look for an automated way to retain history of the previous traces.
patricknoll_import (2018-12-04 00:56:56+00:00): I also contacted MintCondition for his/hier opinion.
patricknoll_import (2018-12-09 08:09:47+00:00): I haven't heard anything from MintCondition so I'll plan to revert most or all of this changeset and come back to reconflate import data with the current data.

I'm tracking issues on https://github.com/pnoll1/bothell_import and am on OSM US slack if you're curious about progress or have more comments/concerns.
patrick noll (2019-01-05 22:28:23+00:00): this area should be fixed with changeset 66058642. I did a partial revert and conflated import data with mint condition's work so they show up in the history
b-jazz (2019-01-17 00:39:07+00:00): Hi there MapperKB, I just wanted to let you know that I've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651844695 since it is a footway that is traced directly on top of a residential road. The wiki discussion on highway=residential (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dresidential) states: "You can definitively walk on residential roads, unless tagged otherwise". So there is no need to draw a footway over a residential way. If you wanted to indicate there are sidewalks, there are a couple different ways that you can do that. Hope this helps.
Glassman (2018-12-03 03:32:32+00:00): I reverted this edit. The new street added on top of an existing road just doesn't make sense.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65110957
Nuvasuper (2018-12-03 05:01:07+00:00): Is there a proper way to merge the Western Washington University border with the road nodes? I didn't realize what I'd done was creating a new road.
Glassman (2018-12-03 06:39:16+00:00): Generally you don't want to connect roads with landuse/borders. I usually have the landuse come right to the edge of the street at the curb. When something changes, for instance WWU grows, you don't need to unglue the nodes to move the landuse.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:08:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
carciofo (2019-05-14 14:01:19+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM. Please note that taking data from Google Maps and uploading it to OSM is not permitted by their terms of service. Only upload information you have first-hand knowledge of or is otherwise open source data. Thanks & happy mapping!
Map-Peter (2018-12-08 10:42:06+00:00): Hallo Xre90, 
nächstes Mal bitte die Statue verschieben, anstatt sie am alten Ort ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1480391088/history ) zu löschen und am neuen Ort neu einzuzeichnen. Denn es ist ein und dieselbe Statue. 
Damit zollt man auch seinen Respekt gegenüber der Arbeit anderer Mapper. 
Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1338231 zu deiner Info. 
Gruß Peter
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:07:54+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck (2018-12-03 16:56:46+00:00): This river meanwhile has 106 object versions, all created by you. The reason seems to be that you're always adding a few points to the river, then saving it again. This inflates the number of versions of the river we have to store, and also falsifies your edit count. Please don't do that. Complete an object, then save it.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 10:16:30+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65065695
jc86035 (2018-12-03 09:43:23+00:00): What are you referring to in the changeset comment? If the thing you've added as a hedge is actually a group of trees, then you should change it to natural=tree_row (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row). Otherwise I can't see anything immediately wrong with what you've added, since all of it appears to exist from the aerial imagery, and nothing is terribly misaligned.
This Is A Display Name Desu (2018-12-03 10:54:55+00:00): I am talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94098744 . The path should only be accessible by very specific personnel from some government officials for maintaining the mountain slope. However on the map I don't know how to mark it clearly.
jc86035 (2018-12-03 10:59:25+00:00): Oh. According to the wiki page it should probably be access=no (inaccessible to general public); access=permit isn't listed on that page and might imply that anyone could get a permit to use the path.
jc86035 (2018-12-03 10:59:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
This Is A Display Name Desu (2018-12-03 11:36:20+00:00): I see, thanks.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DD1GJ (2018-12-03 07:31:17+00:00): Hallo, beachte bitte die Syntax der Öffnungszeiten, da mit sie korrekt ausgewertet werden können: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Joseph E (2019-08-16 12:35:24+00:00): Hi fatur,

I notice you added a bunch of names for roads, like Jalan Jabanda - Yuruf. I assume those are the names of the two villages connected by this road?

Where are you getting the names of these roads and villages? Is it from a government database, or local knowledge, or another map? I'd recommend adding the villages as place=village (a node), if you are sure about the names. But if you don't know for sure, it's better not to add the names to the roads either. Hopefully you have a good source that I can use too, because I would like to add more names.
fatur (2019-08-17 01:48:44+00:00): Hi, Joseph

You can edit the map and give the name. This map is open right. I just give name changes based on the road that passed through the village. Next time I will let blank road without name, on the map.
Joseph E (2019-08-18 14:01:28+00:00): No, it's ok to add the names if they are right, I don't mean to discourage you.

But please also add a node with place=village or place=hamlet and the name of the desa or dusun, if you know it. I want to add more village names, so that's why I was wondering if you had a good source for finding them. 

Google maps and Apple Maps don't have any reliable village names here in Papua yet, for example.
fatur (2019-08-18 14:36:18+00:00): Hi, Joseph.

Currently I working for project in Papua, in 16 Districts. During my daily activity I try draw  a map on OSM base on Bing to make easy to locate our project base on openstreetmap.
The road name that I create is not I right name, I give a name just because the road get through the village. I hope somebody will change later on.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
EliotB (2019-05-17 04:37:40+00:00): Most of the traffic calming added to Aynsley terrace is either non-existent or wrong type (should be chicane, not bump). I have corrected with local knowledge.
Charitha CNK (2019-05-17 16:22:14+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback.  Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. 

Regards,
Charitha CNK
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
abrensch (2018-12-09 23:00:48+00:00): wtf are you doing?
iandees (2018-12-10 00:09:54+00:00): Hey navosm – it looks like you added three tags to a whole bunch of things that aren't roads in this changeset. Will you please fix these errors?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65113344
Warin61 (2018-12-07 06:27:51+00:00): Wrong.

A relation is not tagged on away.

You need to create a relation... it is not a node or a way (a line) .. so read up on how to do that with ID ...I don't use ID so cannot help you there 
This might help
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/58270/how-i-can-create-relation-in-id-editor
And for the relation itself
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
mavl (2019-07-21 12:58:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:58:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:58:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:58:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
praeteritum (2023-08-23 04:46:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140255127.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:58:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 12:59:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Peter W34 (2018-12-03 06:48:21+00:00): I added camping areas, Yackandandah MTB area. Not Daintree.
SimonPoole (2018-12-03 08:38:49+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've undone your changes as you modified existing objects to add SEO spam.. By doing that you are breaching our ToU https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use If you want to add your operation in a factual and correct way, please feel free to do so.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65114735
SimonPoole (2018-12-03 08:40:13+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65116726
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65114735
mavl (2018-12-24 23:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 14:38:20+00:00): Hi patricknoll_import, welcome to OSM.

Do we really need 10 (!) decimal places for the height of a building?
patrick noll (2019-05-13 05:33:47+00:00): height tags have been fixed to 1 decimal place
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-13 10:54:10+00:00): thanks for your answer, after 5 months.
should be checked next time before you do an import.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
GOwin (2018-12-31 05:22:33+00:00): Hi @lorenzo rafael. 

These buildings look great. The only concern I have with this changeset (and several others you've made) is how you've been adding roads incorrectly.

Roads should be traced using their centerlines, and not like tracing the perimeter, much like what you're doing. 

Let us know if you need additional guidance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65115122
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].