piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-20 01:57:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carnildo (2018-03-25 07:48:29+00:00): Thanks for helping improve the map.

20 MPH is an unusual speed limit for a residential street in Spokane -- usually the limit is 25.  Are you sure it's correct?
neuhausr (2018-03-21 13:44:02+00:00): Hi, I am a local mapper, and noticed that @user_5359 removed the description from this node (as it seemed to just be advertising) and you added it back in. Just curious, especially since you apparently do digital advertising, is this information actually of use to others? Because I don't know people would see the description field in a map or even search engine.
user_5359 (2018-03-20 05:15:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
S-zation (2018-03-20 04:49:14+00:00): Hey there,
Thanks for continuing my work!  I stopped because ESRI removed their clarity layer back in January and I haven't gotten around to adding more riverbanks.  My advice would be to split both the outer riverbank lines near where you have ended in your next edit.  I'm not sure how long I made both sides of the outer riverbank when I finished the relation near Tyler State Park, but OSM does not allow for ways that are more than 2,000 nodes long and will give you an error if you try to upload.
WhiteRakogis (2018-03-21 23:17:57+00:00): Will do.  Thanks for the tip.
marianp_telenav (2018-05-29 13:14:11+00:00): Hi, I saw that you removed the oneways on some alleys (IDs: 43710696, 43710695, 556750826 ) after you flagged them with fixme tags, based on survey. We also have some feedbacks that this alleys are oneways  (some have restricted access indicators). Did you really found that those ways aren't oneways  on the field or it is a result of an interpretation? Thanks and regards! Marian Poara, map analyst, Telenav
fmarier (2018-05-29 14:29:59+00:00): I didn't any one-way signs when I walked through them. What sort of feedback did you get that they had restrictions? I can walk there again and look for specific signs if needed.
fmarier (2018-06-01 17:47:56+00:00): I just double-checked this and found "no entry" signs on the corner of Richards and that lane, as well as the corner of Homer and that lane. Essentially preventing cars from entering the lane in an eastbound direction. If you are in the lane though, there's no indication that it's one-way and so you might go in any direction. Should I add turn restrictions from Richards and Homer instead of making the lanes one-way?
fmarier (2018-06-04 18:25:53+00:00): I walked through the whole alley and added turn restrictions for the three "no entry" signs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59546454
AkuAnakTimur (2018-03-20 03:58:22+00:00): Round-shaped hospital?
TTRREEXX (2018-03-20 10:02:13+00:00): Accidentally press wrong and saved. I had been edited and follow back to the shape of that hospital. Don’t worry.
JJIglesias (2018-03-20 07:45:22+00:00): Saludos Andrea, los telefonos de un local se colocan como contact:phone y/o contact:mobile; los addr:housenumber se refieren al Numero de la Casa o Predio/Lote.
Slds
JJ
5m4u9 (2018-03-20 21:11:11+00:00): gracias por editar, utilicé el nombre de la avenida, para toda la via al sur... también no sabía que hubiera un area militar ahí arriba.
Supaplex (2018-03-20 07:53:24+00:00): 這條新路徑是市府官修，還是掃墓，爬山的人開出來的？
WWSS (2018-03-20 13:37:52+00:00): 應該是公家機關修出來的，非常寬、沿途還擺了許多不明的塑膠板。
DaveF (2018-06-23 16:20:54+00:00): And this one Tim
It looks like all your edits may need to be reverted. Please learn how to map responsibly. There are lots of tutorials on the web. Remember, it's not just a map/database for your benefit or hobbies.
Claudius Henrichs (2018-03-20 05:52:15+00:00): Source was DigitalGlobe only. Forgot to remove "Local survey" 🤦‍♂️
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
maraf24 (2018-03-23 10:11:18+00:00): W OSM nie używamy skrótów w nazwach ulic.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
JessAk71 (2018-03-23 18:31:24+00:00): Hello! I see you have added a height for this building at 102. The building already has building:parts that have heights set at the towers which look correct. Can you change the tag for this to accommodate the 3D tagging of these building parts or otherwise remove the building height tag you placed?
JessAk71 (2018-03-23 18:27:10+00:00): Hello! I see you have added a height for this building at 100. The building already has building:parts that have heights set at the towers which look like they are set at 81. Can you change the tag for this to accommodate the 3D tagging of these building parts or otherwise remove the building height tag you placed?
pbUJb (2018-04-28 17:02:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здания рисуются полигоном, а не линией. И выпрямляйте углы зданий.
user_6110846 (2018-03-22 09:40:51+00:00): Editarea a fost anulată. Cauză: Înlăturarea informațiilor de la liniile de frontieră.

Invităm comunitatea ucraineană pe forum. În forum puteți contesta eliminarea informațiilor de la liniile de frontieră.
user_6110846 (2018-03-22 09:41:36+00:00): O zi bună Ne pare rău ați uitat să felicit
Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers (2018-03-22 10:08:03+00:00): Dupa "inventia" la multipolygon , tagurile de admin_level si left/right au devenit redundante si invechite. De ce insistati sa le pastrati? care e scopul practic?
openwiki (2018-03-20 20:33:43+00:00): review requested by mistake
Joymike (2018-03-20 08:07:17+00:00): Well done Joel Continue in that OSM spirit
mbethke (2018-03-20 14:02:59+00:00): Danke für die neuen Eintragungen! Schreib das, was du in "name" eingetragen hast, abe besser in "description", denn um Namen handelt es sich dabei ja nicht. Wenn irgendwas was kostet, gibt es dafür auch fee=yes und fee:amount="10000 LAK" z.B.
Enock4seth (2018-03-24 15:53:11+00:00): Useful information but location data in a random place. Can you please login to http://osm.org and try to move to correct location? Thanks
nikiforov (2018-03-24 12:03:11+00:00): Добрий день. Здається, ви зламали цим пакетом відношення Природнього парку. Виправте, будь ласка.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7397948
nikiforov (2018-03-25 12:34:42+00:00): I've fixed it.
Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers (2018-03-25 12:50:33+00:00): Thank you, my mistake. There was two overlapping reservations and I've made just one.
languitar (2018-03-31 17:49:24+00:00): Also ich bin da ja regelmäßig und das neue Gebäude hat einfach keine Auswuchtung nach vorne zur Öhlmühlenstr.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
GerdP (2023-04-05 05:36:03+00:00): Moin!
Ich frage mich gerade, warum der Radweg https://www.osm.org/way/571211939
so nicht auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist bzw. wenn, dann auf der anderen Seite der Straße. Was ging da schief?
GerdP (2023-04-07 14:57:42+00:00): Der Weg wechselt kurz nach Beginn auf die andere Fahrbahnseite. Habe das mal korrigiert, aber ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein.
demon_box (2018-03-20 10:08:22+00:00): ciao, non puoi mettere material=stone su natural=spring
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5466687890
material=stone lo potresti mettere su amenity=fountain
CAI Salò (2018-03-20 15:17:07+00:00): ok, ma la guida OSM non molto chiara, quindi ho interpretato.
Su un percorso, quindi in relazione con la traccia, come faccio a identificare la relazione in andata e ritorno?
Corrado
CAI Salò (2018-03-20 15:17:35+00:00): p.s. se la sorgente è anche una fontana?
demon_box (2018-03-20 15:26:14+00:00): il senso di marcia si intende quello definito dai 2 tags from ---> to
se la fontana è anche sorgente fai
amenity=fountain + natural=spring
ciao
demon_box (2018-03-20 10:06:01+00:00): anche questa chiesa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189554481
non devi metterla come membro della relazione
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7963870
correggi tu?
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-10-27 03:16:14+00:00): Hi Vũ Văn Thái,
I modified this road (Way 571246789), change to residential highway and smoothing the geometry based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you.
R0bst3r (2018-03-21 08:34:58+00:00): Hallo Loth,
ich glaube hier hat sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen. Die Hausnummer des explorinho Science Centers ist die Beethovenstraße 12. Dieses Gebäude ist meines Wissens nach das Science Center, das Schülerlabor war zumindest seither im Hauptgebäude der Hochschule (Beethovenstraße 1)? 
Viele Grüße
Loth (2018-03-21 09:51:16+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
ich kenne mich vor Ort nicht aus, habe einen Artikel in der StZ gelesen und nehme sowas meist zum Anlass das dann in OSM einzupflegen / zu prüfen. Die Webseite verweist auf beides Science Center und Schülerlabor. Danach habe ich dann als 12 das Science Center hoffentlich richtig eingetragen. Das Schülerlabor in 1 müßte auf dem Campus nördlicher sein. Das habe ich aber nicht gemappt. Und auf den Webseiten auch nichts gefunden wo das genau auf dem Campus liegen könnte.
Wenn Du das verbessern kannst "feel free" das zu tun. Ich sehe im Moment keinen Fehler. Gruss loth
Loth (2018-03-21 10:06:38+00:00): Noch ein Hinweis, auf der Webseite steht dass das explorhino Science Center erst seit dem 17.3. 2018 geöffnet ist. Vermutlich ist das Teil des Science Centers. Dann wäre vielleicht eine Umbenennung in Science Center (explorhino) besser. Und für die Lage des Schülerlabors könnte ich mal per E-Mail anfragen, wenn du das auch nicht weisst.?
Loth
R0bst3r (2018-03-21 14:39:06+00:00): Ich sehe, du hast es bereits korrigiert, da war ich einen Änderungssatz zu spät dran. Wurde unter osmcha so angezeigt und verlinkt, habs nicht geprüft bevor ich kommentiert habe, sorry. 
Das aktuelle Schülerlabor kenn ich nicht. Mein Stand ist ca 5 Jahre alt, da wars im Ostflügel im EG des Hauptgebäudes. Wenn mans eintragen möchte, muss man wohl definitiv nachfragen. Danke!
Thomas S-W (2018-03-20 09:30:34+00:00): http://portalamazonia.com/noticias/corrente-em-reserva-indigena-sera-retirada-de-fronteira-entre-roraima-e-amazonas
eggie (2018-03-20 10:22:42+00:00): Ik kijk even naar je edits, want het lijkt erop dat je over de bestaande wegen weer een nieuwe weg hebt neergelegd.
Dit was je edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57344266
eggie (2018-03-20 10:29:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #57346195
eggie (2018-03-20 10:35:07+00:00): dj nijkamp.. ik heb je edits teruggezet wegens te veel schade.  Je had op de Huttenwal geprobeerd een weg te tekenen over het voetgangersgebied heen, Dat kan niet. Ok de Haarstraat heb je over het voetgangersgebied heen een highway=residential gelegd. 
Wat was precies je bedoeling. Ook loopt hier een fietsknooppuntroute die mag niet zomaar onderbroken worden. Probeer eerst eens te oefenen in een park of stuk bos. Je kunt het hokje aanvinken bij opslaan met de tekst.. “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”
Niet zomaar wat uitproberen in zo'n ingewikkeld gebied.. dat gaat per definitie mis. 
Graag reactie...
eggie (2018-03-20 10:38:35+00:00): De Haarstraat staat al middels access:conditional open op bepaalde tijden en iedem voor levering van goederen. Het is hier goed getagd.
eggie (2018-03-20 10:46:02+00:00): Hier niets meer veranderen zonder overleg vooraf svp.
abrensch (2018-08-28 06:33:11+00:00): Hallo SvenQ,

kannst Du mal diese Note anscheun bzgl. Enddatum der Sperrung Bernsdorfer?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1505307
Hjart (2018-03-20 09:43:12+00:00): Jeg har rullet dette tilbage idet det ikke var specielt heldigt udført
Hjart (2018-03-20 09:45:29+00:00): En mere præcis kildeangivelse vil også være at foretrække
frosm (2018-03-22 11:16:01+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur osm.
je réagis à votre demande de vérification.
je ne comprend pas exactement la situation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427585184
le précédent contributeur a indiqué que ces rails étaient abandonnée et accessible comme chemin.
Vous l'avez changé en rail utilisé tout en gardant l'accès comme piéton et un nom qui semble indiquer que ce n'est plus utilisé.
c'est abandonné permis aux piétons ou réutilisé et donc sans doute plus permis aux piétons ?
Carnildo (2018-03-25 08:04:18+00:00): Is Midway really a reversible one-way street?
glglgl (2018-03-20 14:29:24+00:00): Das war mein Changeset #5000, und ich habe es NICHT gemerkt. Schande über mich.
R0bst3r (2018-03-22 09:52:07+00:00): Glückwunsch nachträglich! :D
glglgl (2018-03-22 16:34:48+00:00): Danke! :-D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:22:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Anazaar (2018-07-13 20:45:15+00:00): Witam w Łagowie z pomocą importu zmieniono adresy z 1-Lutego na Promenada, która to zmiana nigdy nie weszła, a niestety ukazała się w punktach adresowych. Ulica nazywa się teraz Spacerowa. Tą nazwę już zatwierdzono. Pozdrawiam.
stephankn (2018-05-06 16:36:53+00:00): It is unusual to add source tags to the individual elements, especially for such common things like GPS or survey. In case you plan to continue doing it: Please use the correct spelling of the tag, which is "source". Note the small "s". You did hundreds with a capital S.
user_7672848 (2018-05-06 17:57:15+00:00): I have done 146 edits, not all of them related to positioning. How can I have done 'hundreds' of the tags you find so offensive?
stephankn (2018-05-06 18:45:15+00:00): What is your point? You do bad tagging in a large portion of your tagging. Does the exact number matter? Run the query yourself: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yzi

366 nodes, 62 ways
user_7672848 (2018-05-18 04:25:03+00:00): If you really feel a need to be a smart-arse to someone, you should at least have the courtesy to get your facts straight.

I really do not appreciate the unhelpful tone on here and I shall stop adding new stuff. If you have any say in the matter, kindly see to it that the contributions I have made so far are deleted. Good bye and good riddance.
atcomapper (2018-03-20 10:20:55+00:00): Hvis du ved det er skure, kan de med fordel tagges med det mere præcise building=shed i stedet for det generelle building=yes
Supaplex (2018-03-20 11:52:12+00:00): 富陽生態公園已經存在標示了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4820140
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:11:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
abakus_uploader (2018-03-20 23:36:47+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
demon_box (2018-04-01 19:16:15+00:00): ciao, guarda qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5490803042
prima di tutto il nodo lo devi mettere esattamente all'intersezione tra torrente e sentiero altrimento non ha senso e poi il tag è ford=yes non waterway=ford ;-)
ok?
lo sistemi per favore?
grazie
--enrico
eggie (2018-03-20 11:27:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-20 11:38:22+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
office=estate_agent toegevoegd.
stefanct (2021-07-13 20:25:26+00:00): How does https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8130282 not violate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories ?
It also seems to not be maintained at all. I'd rather remove it. What do you think?
Nielkrokodil (2023-03-08 21:19:10+00:00): I now deleted this railjet-relation in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133456168
JessAk71 (2018-03-23 18:23:57+00:00): Hello! I see you added a height value of 119 for this building. OSM needs heights in m not ft. If this 119 is in m this is incorrect as this is only a 5 story building. If this is in ft then please convert this to m and update the tag to say 36.
eggie (2018-03-20 11:39:32+00:00): please don't tag addesses at buildings.. They are already present at the nodes..
eggie (2018-03-20 11:41:35+00:00): removed duplicate address from building
user_1470980 (2018-12-21 06:41:28+00:00): Hallo willisturm, ich beschäftige mich aktuell mit einem Lizenz Problem. https://addresshistory.wordpress.com/2018/12/21/luftbildsituation-in-oesterreich-fuer-openstreetmap-zwecke/ demnach dürfen wir basemap.at Luftbilder die unter CC BY Lizenziert sind, nicht für unsere Zwecke nutzen. Das trifft zum Glück nicht auf die BEV Adressen zu (Projekt Austraaddresshelper) 

ich sehe nun dass Du in diesem Changeset mehrfach als Source basemap.at angegeben hast, aber ansonsten vielfach auch auf geoimage.at verlinkst, was perfekt ist. Daher bitte ich Dich künftig nur noch geoimage luftbilder verwenden.  Vielleicht ist es Dir auch möglich, Inhalte mit problematischen Lizenzhinweisen nochmals zu überarbeiteten.  Lg Johann Haag
user_6110846 (2018-12-07 13:12:05+00:00): Hello what is the name of the validator that you found an error in the Vylkove?
BeKri (2018-12-08 05:57:32+00:00): Sorry,
don't know, what you mean ...
Which Error ? 
And to be honest: it's 9 month ago ...
Greeting Bernhard
user_6110846 (2018-12-08 18:47:53+00:00): You do not understand me. I asked how did you find my mistake? did you check the map — with what software script — to find my error? Thanks to your work - Nominatim to render my object qualitatively
BeKri (2018-12-08 23:03:49+00:00): > You do not understand me.
You are right: I DONT UNDERSTAND YOU
> I asked how did you find my mistake?
WHAT IS THE MISTAKE FROM YOU I FOUND ? Tell me, what I did in your opinion, what do you mean ?

> did you check the map — with what software script — to find my error? Thanks to your work - Nominatim to render my object qualitatively 
As long I dont know, which mistake I found 
i only can imagin, what you mean.
Greetings from Bernhard
Derick Rethans (2018-04-03 09:09:22+00:00): I just noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1339802 — are you drawing this for the *new* layout, or the old layout?
tklug (2018-04-03 10:46:11+00:00): Thanks for the notice. I was working with stationplans provided by TFL as it seems it's an old one. I will inform them and hopefully get the new one.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-21 00:38:28+00:00): Not sure a neighborhood tag really has a height to it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57348492
Sreelalitha yerramshetty (2018-03-21 09:19:44+00:00): Yes you are right.
Leo Slager (2018-05-27 10:37:12+00:00): Je maakt en beginnersfout. Oneway=reversible heeft een heel andere betekenins als twee richtingsverkeer. Lees dat maar eens na in de wiki. Ik heb het dus weer teruggezet naar oneway=no.
eggie (2020-12-25 13:30:02+00:00): Ik vraag me af waarom rhaan de fietspaden op slot zet met access=no
Ik zal access=no verwijderen. 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-25 13:34:47+00:00): foot=no ook verwijderd van fietspad
Mir76 (2018-11-09 19:15:51+00:00): С карты ГГЦ нельзя копировать, это их собственность. Пожалуйста, не делайте так больше.
mike140 (2018-03-25 11:44:53+00:00): Посилання на wikipedia про річку Глиницю має бути в тому форматі що є зараз (після мого виправлення)
UPegasus (2018-03-25 13:52:54+00:00): Дякую за допомогу
heilbron (2018-07-15 13:32:37+00:00): Hallo!
1. Wenn ein neues Gebäude eingezeichnet, sollte das alte gemerget oder der "disused:..." für das alte verwendet werden!
2. Der **Name** des neuen Gebäudes ist doch nicht "Ten Brinke Wohnungsbau". Das wäre der Name eines Büros (was da ja nicht ist) oder höchstens der "Operator"!
timmito (2018-03-20 13:37:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast auf die Straße einen Punkt mit einem Namen gesetzt. So bringt das leider nichts. Wenn es sich um einen Massagesalon handelt, dann setzte einen Punkt in das entsprechende Gebäude mit shop=massage und dem Namen.
opendcc (2018-03-20 21:44:44+00:00): Ist diese Straße so von der Gemeinde gewidmet worden? Mit Namen und access=private?
CRCulver (2018-03-20 23:09:34+00:00): I see that you are adding people’s names to houses. Like Mr Ignor in this edit. This is not public information and generally should not be added to OSM. Please respond.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.