piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-11-06 04:59:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the new highway (parking aisle) with the existing highways.
Aleks-Berlin (2019-12-16 14:20:24+00:00): why do you add an empty name tag to a node?
user_5359 (2019-11-06 05:08:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If the building "Hair Cuttery" contains a hairdresser, please add shop=hairdresser also (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhairdresser)
berndw (2019-11-07 10:01:20+00:00): Hallo Kelvino

Es ist normalerweise nicht erforderlich ein access=yes an solche Objekte zu taggen.
Sinnvoll wäre z. B. bis zu welchem Alter und/oder zu welchen Zeiten dieser Spielplatz genutzt werden  darf
Schaust Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Für Fragen stehe ich gern zur Verfügung

Ansonsten viel Spaß bei OSM
ianlopez1115 (2019-11-06 14:28:30+00:00): Hello,

You may want to consider tagging residential buildings as building=residential or its various subtypes (house, apartment, etc; more info can be found at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building). Also, the landuse tag describes the use of the land (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse).
ianlopez1115 (2019-11-06 14:29:49+00:00): Hello,

No need to delete existing ways showing farm land, they can be retagged instead
kartonage (2019-11-06 19:30:31+00:00): In this changeset you blindly created 3 social_facilites just because the buildings had the name. Did you actually check these objects or is it a script you are running?
kartonage (2019-11-06 19:28:13+00:00): In this changeset you also didn't check already existing data and automatically added duplicate data. You should stop your "fixes" and start actually taking some time and think about what you are doing.
dvdhoven (2019-11-06 19:43:07+00:00): This changeset reverted.
You doubled the information that was already there. And in the Netherlands we don't tag adresinformation on buildings, we tag it on the adressnodes and  the information was already there
kartonage (2019-11-06 10:28:11+00:00): You have duplicated the amenity values. I really don't understand why you keep on churning out these low-quality changesets where you don't even look at the data. They are producing more nonsense than they are improving things. But since you are not answering your comments, the only way to reach you is again through DWG and a block?

This changeset has been reverted since it's obviously creating nonsense.
kartonage (2019-11-06 10:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted since it's obviously creating nonsense. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76674483
viloan (2019-11-06 02:53:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-11-06 03:28:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:57:58+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110985927
ianlopez1115 (2019-11-06 14:05:26+00:00): No need to delete way 39423000 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39423000/history), the nodes can be adjusted instead of creating another way
BCNorwich (2019-11-07 07:47:23+00:00): Hello rkumreo, 

Inadvertent duplication here, you've placed Way: 742385233 directly on top of Way: 742385141 
I've left the duplication, hopefully you'll be able to correct it. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
rkumreo (2019-11-08 16:34:36+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake. Deleted the duplicate road segment refer the changeset (76821922).Will take this as learning for the future edits. Please let me know if any changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
rkumreo
mavl (2019-12-05 22:03:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
user_5359 (2019-11-06 16:09:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the tag lanes=0 on the way https://www.osm.org/way/742387310. Please read thepage https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes#No_lane_markings for a better description.
iWowik (2020-01-25 12:21:13+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их не просто найти.
seattlefyi (2019-11-06 16:50:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits and welcome to OSM! One suggestion I'd make here is that the mapping guideline is that names which aren't really a name, but just describe the type of object ("driveway") should be avoided! Thanks again, and happy mapping!
Hjart (2019-11-06 07:31:01+00:00): Why are you adding german descriptions to the name tag of a place in Denmark?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
kphklaus (2019-11-06 07:47:12+00:00): I am not happy abbaut that what i have made, please make it better. The point is that a færgeterminalen
for a electro Ship is a lot different as a normal. For that problem we have no example in the world that i can take. It ist the first in the world. To use the name is a bat thing, i thing to. And so i am happy to find an other one to help for this problem😊
arjunaraoc (2019-11-07 10:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76746673 where the changeset comment is:
Hjart (2019-11-06 07:28:37+00:00): Why are you adding german descriptions to the name tag of a place in Denmark?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Nedfro (2020-02-02 16:46:10+00:00): Woher hast du die Nummer? Im Datensatz des GWR (https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/) ist das Haus Nummer 5.
Glassman (2019-11-06 18:15:01+00:00): Tip: use highway=service + service=driveway to tag driveways. Use of a descriptive name is not recommended. I'll fix this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76678373
Glassman (2019-11-06 18:18:23+00:00): I fixed this as well
Glassman (2019-11-06 18:19:39+00:00): Living streets have specific legal requirements. This looks like a residential street
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76678432
WoodWoseWulf (2019-11-06 19:44:38+00:00): Hi Felix,
What were you trying to add here? You created a park inside of a building and named it for its coordinates.
mavl (2019-11-07 14:38:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Простите, откуда здесь железнодорожный переезд?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/983949415  
  
Здесь нет поблизости железной дороги. Что именно вы хотели здесь обозначить?
Kovoschiz (2019-11-06 23:04:45+00:00): Should this not be represented by a sign object instead?
Ian Ho (2019-11-07 00:13:21+00:00): Sorry for incomplete remarks, the original location of the peak feature was actually inaccurate, which is several meters lower altitude than the highest point. The so called sign post is indicating the peak and highest point. So it is about accuracy of the peak.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-07 05:25:35+00:00): Thx
trigpoint (2019-11-06 07:31:21+00:00): Why have you removed access=private from these ways. School grounds are private, you cannot be here without permission.
Please restore these tags.

Cheers Phil
YaStratospheric (2019-11-06 13:48:06+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I removed the access tag guided by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access, because the school is a public place, it can be accessed not only by personal permission, which is confirmed by the driver’s report. An access=destination tag has been added to the gate to indicate that access is available here for those associated with this place.
Access=private means that you can’t get at this location without direct owner permission. If postal service, delivery trucks, guests or clients can reach these roads as their final destination, access should be other than private.
Please share if you have any additional information on restricting access to this place.
trigpoint (2019-11-06 14:02:40+00:00): A school is not a public place, access is covered by safeguarding issues.

Permission is implied for postal deliveries and the fact an item has been ordered for delivery is an invite to access the private areas.

Destination means anyone who wants to go there can, which in the case of a school is clearly false. 

When a destination is specified that is private the router will ask for confirmation that you have permission, so providing a properly configured router is being used private will not cause a problem. 

Cheers Phil
YaStratospheric (2019-11-07 08:33:40+00:00): Thank you very much for the comment and information provided. We will clarify our approach to private roads for such situations. Added tag access = private for roads and gates.
TheDutchMan13 (2019-11-08 21:20:25+00:00): Don't forget to add a changeset comment :)
bizen241 (2019-11-06 11:08:29+00:00): はじめまして:)
今回追加されたノードのうちいくつかが既存のものと重複しているようです。
ご意見がなければこちらで修正します。
abakus_uploader (2019-11-06 23:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2019-12-22 19:43:55+00:00): To kasowanie poszło nieco za daleko. Początek i koniec usuniętej drogi istnieją na pewno.
abakus_uploader (2019-11-06 23:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2019-11-06 09:34:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie

review volgt
eggie (2019-11-06 09:39:18+00:00): Rickerino.. je bedoeling zal ongetwijfelkd goed zijn, maar een rotonde wordt anders gemapt. Om te beginnen met junction=roundabout
oneway=yes hoeft niet op een rotonde. 
Eigenlijk geen beginnerswerk. De landuse grass is ook verkleefd met de weg. dat is niet gewenst.
Dit zijn je edits. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76682260
gr
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-06 09:54:31+00:00): Een gedeelte van de zuidelijke Morsweg zit geplakt op de rotonde..
Klik in achavi maar eens op die Morsweg. Dan kun je dat zien.
 Routeren doet het allemaal niet meer hier. Ik kijk of ik e.e.a. kan herstellen.
eggie (2019-11-06 10:02:22+00:00): De Spelerstraat loopt ook als een opgeplakte weg door op de rotonde. Ik heb het in ieder geval weer routeerbaar gemaakt. junction = roundabout toegevoed. De sorteervakken verwijderd, want dat zal de oude situatie zijn geweest. 
Er zit in OSM heel veel achter die tagging om de routering te laten werken. Het lijkt zo simpel, maar het is verre van dat. Je kunt op het forum advies vragen hoe zoiets aan te pakken.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-06 10:11:13+00:00): Op het moment dat er een nieuwe lucht en/of satellietfoto beschikbaar komt zal e.e.a. nog moeten worden bijgewerkt. 
In de BGT omtrekgericht (landmeetkundige dienst)  is nog niets te zien van de rotonde. Superview aug 2019 geeft ook geen uitsluitsel. Het routeert nu weer. 
Gr eggie
rickerino (2019-11-06 10:13:48+00:00): super bedankt, ik heb inderdaad nog wel een en ander te leren op dit gebied.

de rontonde is ook net pas klaar: https://www.tubantia.nl/rijssen-holten/rijbanen-bij-nieuwe-rotonde-in-rijssen-te-smal~a19a56b8/

vandaar dat hij ook nog nergens op de andere kaarten ziet staan
gr rick
eggie (2019-11-06 10:30:30+00:00): Klopt.. dat artikel had ik ook al gevonden. Beginnersfouten worden je overigens niet kwalijk genomen. 
Het is in ieder geval weer actueel!
Gr eggie
alphensebezorger (2019-11-06 10:49:02+00:00): Op de nieuwste foto (van 5 oktober) op satellietdataportaal.nl is de rotonde (tussen de wolken door) te zien: https://satellietdataportaal.nl/wmslayer/20191005_105506_SV1-04
eggie (2019-11-06 11:29:16+00:00): Oke.., maar die link krijg ik niet werkend. In 
https://satellietdataportaal.nl/  is aug de laatste versie.
rickerino (2019-11-06 12:22:40+00:00): Het is een wms layer die kan je inladen in bijvoorbeeld qgis en daar staat tussen de wolken inderdaad de nieuwe rontondes al op. Voor je gemak heb ik ze op imgur geupload als screenshots: https://i.imgur.com/uuMZHFD.png , https://i.imgur.com/9vYG97r.png
eggie (2019-11-06 12:36:13+00:00): Oke.... dan klopt het nu aardig!
alphensebezorger (2019-11-06 12:55:42+00:00): Als je op satellietdataportaal bij interessegebied "morsweg rijssen" intypt, krijg je onderin beeld een overzicht van alle opnames in die buurt. Daar had ik de wms-link vandaan. Dit zijn niet landsdekkende opnames, daarom moet je eerst de locatie opgeven waarschijnlijk.
eggie (2019-11-06 13:23:12+00:00): Oke.. thanks.. weer wat geleerd.
eggie (2019-11-06 09:47:38+00:00): Alle adressen zijn import van het Kadaster. Je kunt het ontbreken van adresnodes doorgeven aan het Kadaster.
Even op het potloodje klikken https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=ethaanstraat%202b&resultOffset=0&objectId=1742200000033132&geometry.x=230907.781&geometry.y=481494.905&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1742010000015428
Eggie
Kovoschiz (2019-11-06 23:05:44+00:00): Why don't you keep `natural=rock` and preserve the original name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76682851
Kovoschiz (2019-11-06 23:06:55+00:00): Again, please don't tag for renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer), and keep the original tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76682935
Leo Slager (2019-11-08 07:51:11+00:00): gewijzigd in parking_entrance
M!dgard (2019-11-18 01:55:57+00:00): Goed bezig! Merci voor de waterlopen.
opendcc (2019-11-06 08:38:17+00:00): Sehr gut, life-cycle präfix!

Sag mal, das Altenheim gleich nördlich: St. Wolfagang? Oder doch St. Wolfgang?

Servus Wolfgang (ohne 2. a ..)
blodern (2019-11-07 10:33:43+00:00): Ich denke, dass es St. Wolfgang heißt.
Vermutlich nur ein Tippfehler
trigpoint (2019-11-06 16:28:22+00:00): Hi
Horsley Lane was previously tagged as a public bridleway, which indicates that it does not have public motor vehicles access rights and hence cannot be highway=unclassified.

It should be highway=service with motor_vehicle=private.

Cheers Phil
YaStratospheric (2019-11-07 11:50:59+00:00): Hi again, Phil!
Horsley Lane was initially tagged as bridleway back in 2006. And this tag was adopted by all segments of this road. I assumed this road is unclassified because it is too long to be a service=driveway. But I agree that highway=sevice is good too.
But I can't find in wiki any limitations about using
highway=unclassified + designated=public_bridleway, is that specified somewhere?
Also I agree that motor_vehicle=private could be added, I just can't find any information about that in open sources. What I could use as a reason to add this tag?
Thank you for commenting, this is really important for us.
ZLima12 (2022-05-19 23:02:16+00:00): Hi,

Why did you add these turn restrictions? I checked Bing Streetside, which you specified as a source, but I don't see any signs restricting turns.
leelamrs (2022-05-23 06:24:31+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting my edit.
Apologies for adding the incorrect turn restriction, its an honest mistake from my end.
Going ahead, i'll ensure to be extra cautious while adding the turn restrictions.
Thanks once again for fixing the edit, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
leelamrs
pangoSE (2019-11-06 08:36:47+00:00): add water=lake in albania
The Controller13 (2019-11-06 08:35:41+00:00): COZY Farmသို့သွားသည့် လမ်းငယ်အားမှတ်သားပါသည်။
Arnebius (2019-11-10 09:45:46+00:00): PRZY DODAWANIU ADRESÓW PROSZĘ RÓWNIEŻ WPISYWAĆ NAZWĘ MIEJSCOWOŚCI I KOD POCZTOWY !!!
Cucazer (2022-11-07 14:06:21+00:00): Hallo! 

Leider hat der Tag public_transport in OpenStreetMap (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:public_transport) etwas andere Bedeutung als Durchfaht zu verbieten. Dafür habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128599444 auf bus=no (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Verkehrsmittel) als Fahrverbot für die Büsse umgetauscht. Wenn aus irgendwelchen Grund das auch für andere öffentliche Verkehrsmittel (z.B. Taxis) gilt, kann es mit psv=no verallgemeinet werden.

Gruß,
Cucazer
The Controller13 (2019-11-06 12:36:53+00:00): ငါးထပ်ကြီးဘုရား၏ ဘွဲ့တော်အပြည့်အစုံအားထပ်မံဖြည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
muralito (2019-11-06 23:12:49+00:00): En OSM va "stream" para cursos de agua que se puedan saltar. El Arroyo Pergamino es "river" en estos tramos.

No se mapea por la traduccion literal de los terminos al español, sino por el significado de cada termino que podes encontrar en la wiki.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-11-07 03:18:36+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Не нужно удалять здания!

В следующий раз откачу правку полностью.
olehz (2019-11-07 20:13:52+00:00): что за вымышленные линии? удаляю нафиг
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
olehz (2019-11-17 16:03:12+00:00): https://nadoloni.com/#14.97/48.14268/30.61424 - так должно быть. То, что ты нанес, нет ни на кадастр, ни на одном из спутниковых снимков. Можно доказательства, что там что-то есть?
eggie (2019-11-06 09:43:59+00:00): Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert met editor iD vaak schade op. Niet doen dus. 
Gebouwen zijn import van het kadaster. Beter niet veranderen. Nieuwe gebouwen worden geïmporteerd via het forum.
eggie (2019-11-06 09:41:22+00:00): Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 
New small changes zegt niemand iets.
Eggie
literan (2019-11-07 12:31:31+00:00): не совсем понял, зачем https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742428127#map=19/55.76091/37.58013 вот это соединение пешеходного графа и железнодорожного?
azakh-world (2019-11-10 08:48:37+00:00): Предлагаю удалить такие соединения. Они не отвечают никакой, даже воображаемой, линии, их местоположение произвольно в пределах всей платформы. Для марштуризации это всё равно что соединять автобусные остановки вроде https://www.osm.org/node/840756250 возле МКАДа дорожками с самим МКАДом для "правильного соединения пеших и автобусных маршрутов".
literan (2019-11-10 09:14:36+00:00): Насколько я понимаю, за маршрутизацию на станции ответственно отношение public_transport=stop_area
type=public_transport. Поэтому никакой надобности в таких дутых пешеходных дорожках нет.
literan (2019-11-13 20:39:06+00:00): cyberden, так, конечно, дела не делают. Начали и бросили все на полпути, оставив нам разгребать. Добавили объектов, а layer корректный не проставили, понаделали этих отростков. Откатывать что ли?
cyberden (2019-11-13 21:09:56+00:00): Приветствую.
Правки по соединению откачу в ближайшее время, правки по разделению стопов и станций оставлю - это хоть как-то всем пригодится и, тем более, соответствует стандарту OSM (и не вызывает вопросов, как я понял).

Замечу в скобках - без связного графа OSM не получит маршрутизации ни по метро ни, тем более, метро-пешеход (да, я внимательно ознакомился с https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zverik/diary/43020 - так конечно же делать нельзя, но, если сообщество это устраивает то и ладно)
cyberden (2019-11-13 21:19:12+00:00): на мой взгляд, самое правильное было бы соединять все-таки именно таким образом, но навешивать какую-то специальную метку на такие соединения типа "невидимый" - чтобы не отображалось на карте и не мешало.
Тогда не придется городить колхоз с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Metro_Mapping, смотреть на теги, area и пытаться таким образом вычислять пересадки (к примеру) - такой метод конечно же работает, но однозначно медленно и хрупко, подвержен ошибкам.

Но, это совсем другая история и слишком глобальные изменения