piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-03-14 20:16:47+00:00): Maar nu wel bijna perfect.  Alleen motor_vehicle=no nog verwijderen :)
Dat hoort niet op een fietspad. 
Je moest eens weten hoe wij als doorgewinterde mappers ooit zijn begonnen.
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-14 20:11:50+00:00): Beste Gqipst .. geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Lokale mappers hebben daar ook weer belang bij.
MVG,
Eggie
tordans (2020-03-14 20:05:18+00:00): Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom
trial (2020-03-21 10:05:35+00:00): Hi, if you're adding POI in very different places, please make several changesets. Otherwise the map tiles are recomputed for no good reason and people monitoring their are of interest get useless information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82202739
eggie (2021-02-07 16:23:45+00:00): Dag Gri...  We zijn met een aantal mappers even aan het brainstormen over de accesstags hier .. De vraag is even waarom je access=no tagt in combinatie met bicycle en foot=yes?
Eigenlijk wordt die combinatie ontmoedigd. 
Je zou evt. kunnen aanhaken. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98845050#map=13/52.1329/6.3734

MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-03-14 20:22:18+00:00): Top Bas van Pelt! Je zult nu ook zien dat de naam zal renderen.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
skorasaurus (2020-03-15 17:42:27+00:00): hey, good to see you back mapping and thanks for your contributions. :)

Regards,
will in lakewood.
PT-53 (2020-03-18 06:47:29+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
im OSM-Inspector wird wieder einmal ein Hinweis  für einen "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.17113&lat=47.65713&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Gebäude:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131651678
Einen anderen Hinweis habe ich vorgestern bereits korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82242981

Ich habe keine Lust, immer wieder Deine Fehler ausgleichen zu müssen und erwarte daß Du regelmäßig das QS-Tool OSM-Inspector benutzt und Deine Fehler selbst bereinigst.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-02 15:11:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781394460
Ist landuse=unused ein Fehler oder Absicht? Wenn ja, was bedeutet es? Es steht nicht im Wiki und wird nur sehr selten verwendet.
Is landuse=unused a mistake or on purpose? If so, what does it mean? It is not in the wiki and its use is very rare.
czubi (2020-03-14 21:34:39+00:00): Ein paar Anmerkungungen zu diesem CS.
Versuche bitte alle Informationen nur einmal abzubilden.
An der Schule ist die Anschrift doppel, einmal am landuse und einmal am Gebäude. Das erzeugt einen Fehler. DAs gleiche gilt für "staatliche Grundschule ....". Das käme nur an housename wenn es wirklich draussen am Gebäude eingemeisselt wäre, was ich nicht glaube.
Die Zäune am besten von der Landuse Fläche trennen (nicht verkleben). Ist zwar nicht direkt falsch aber auf die Dauer besser händelbar. Name ist the name only.   Bei Turnhalle und Friedhofskapelle streiten sich die Geister. Wenn es nicht explizit draussen dransteht dann nicht, nur wenn es wirklich Eigennamen sind. Kannst du hier auch nochmal nachlesen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65085
complete_gth (2020-03-15 13:35:15+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise,
ist geändert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82217471
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse2 (2023-02-14 01:01:46+00:00): Hello,
I'm not convinced that "designation" is ideal for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781397657/history - it already has intermittent=yes; "designation" is normally used for legal designations.
Best Regards,
Andy
G_Meredith (2023-02-14 08:17:16+00:00): Good morning.
Tag has been removed.
Regards.
Gavin Meredith.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
jmapb (2020-03-15 02:02:12+00:00): Hi RhonenNY, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It seems that you were attempting to delete the name "Lincoln Building" from this building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247862290
...but actually you deleted the entire building instead.
I've restored the deleted building and moved the previous name and wikipedia link to the correct building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248773789

Please be careful and double-check before saving, because the changes you make to the map publish immediately and many people rely on an accurate NYC map. Let me know if you have any questions, happy to help.

jmapb
bxl-forever (2020-03-23 10:23:27+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for adding more stuff to OSM.
You mention https://www.tracesofwar.nl/ as your data source.  This website states "all rights reserved" on its pages and their copyright page explicitely forbids any reproduction ("Niets van deze website mag worden overgenomen, gebruikt of gereproduceerd worden, zonder uitdrukkelijke en schriftelijke toestemming van het STIWOT-bestuur." / "Nothing of this web site may be copied, used or reproduced without explicit agreement in writing from the board of STIWOT.").
Did you get permission from them to re-use this data and put it into OpenStreetMap?  What did they say?
Thanks for replying.
neoLithos (2020-12-08 10:15:02+00:00): Hallo j1scad.

Vielen Dank, dass du dich auch um die Randgebiete von Plauen mit kümmerst. Ich habe nur eine Frage:

Wo hast du das Gebäude 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781405199
gefunden? Gestern auf meinem Heimweg bin ich noch einmal vorbei und habe es nicht gefunden. Kannst du mir helfen?

Viele Grüße, Frank.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
canfe (2020-03-15 08:08:21+00:00): Benvenuto nella comunità OSM.
Il parcheggio che hai mappato, non è collegato a nessuna via d'accesso.
Così, il motore di routing non riesce a trovarlo.
Dalle sole immagini aeree non riesco a correggere l'errore, puoi provvedere tu?
!bm (2020-03-14 23:29:54+00:00): Hallo janolezab! #reviewRequestReply 
Beim Gebäudetyp geht es, so wie ich das Wiki verstehe, um den Typus, als der es gebaut wurde, nicht die aktuelle Nutzung. Falls das also ein altes Industriegebäude ist, dann ist building=industrial schon richtig. Außerdem denke ich, dass craft=brewery doppelt bzw falsch getaggt ist, da schon an node 5462386937 "Brauhaus Spandau" mit microbrewery=yes erfasst ist. Was meinst du?
--besteGrüße!bm
janolezab (2020-03-15 02:06:04+00:00): Da hast du eigentlich Recht! Gibt es eigentlich einen „normalen“ Weg, ein Restaurant+Biergarten+Brauerei+Hotel zu taggen? Sind mehrere Nodes hier richtig?
!bm (2020-03-16 16:44:00+00:00): Gute Frage, weiß ich nicht. Aber ein Biergarten ist räumlich/baulich sicher von Beherbergung zu unterscheiden. Keine Ahnung, wie das hier ist, aber auch ein Restaurantbetrieb mag vom Biergarten getrennt geführt werden. (Die Funktionen sind jeweils andere, die Nutzer können, müssen aber nicht unterschiedliche sein.) Insoferne es ein Biergarten ist – was mWn ebenfalls keine klare Definition hat – und kein reiner Gastgarten, der einfach per outdoor_seating=* spezifiziert werden könnte. Falls du noch etwas dazu findest, gerne mitteilen! --besteGrüße!bm
user_5359 (2020-03-15 05:24:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. You take some very unusual keys for the address information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
ortho_is_hot (2020-03-16 11:04:47+00:00): G'day C24B,

When you refer to "council records", is this separate from the base map that you've used in the editor? If so, which council and do you know if there is a waiver for the information to be included in OSM?

Thanks,
ortho_is_hot
C24B (2020-03-17 09:20:12+00:00): Hi there.  Publicly available information was obtained from Willoughby City Council in the publication Griffin Reserves Castlecrag Plan of Management Part 3.  Hope this helps.
boldtrn (2020-11-06 11:44:56+00:00): Hi, you added gravel to Road 92 (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28809764) is this really correct? On Google Streetview it seems that the road is paved.
NKA (2020-11-06 12:30:46+00:00): In that case just edit it. The import surface data is correct most of the time but not in all cases.
boldtrn (2020-11-06 12:32:28+00:00): Google Maps / Streetview is not an allowed source for OSM, so I unfortunately can't do that. So you don't know the street yourself?
NKA (2020-11-06 12:58:51+00:00): No, I do not. The Norway Ortophoto imagery is a permitted source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
mapman44 (2020-03-15 01:34:57+00:00): Is "Farmers market" the name of the place, or is it just a description? If it is a description, do not use it as the name. Please do not abbreviate anything, and use appropriate capitalization, so it should be "Pacific Highway", not "pacific hwy".  The phone number you entered may work ok but please check the Wiki for suggested formats: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82205814
maraf24 (2020-03-25 12:26:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7293035107
Osiecze? Nie, Piaseczno powinno być i tak jest na http://piaseczno.e-mapa.net/ - i to jest strona z której powinien być zrobiony import, a nie ze błednego PRG.
syntex (2020-03-25 14:55:05+00:00): dziwne, jedynie adresy z tej ulicy mają jako addr:city dodane Osiecze, nie zauważyłem tego, już poprawiłem
adas_ (2020-03-15 10:30:03+00:00): Witam
Czy możliwe jest cofnięcie wprowadzonych zmian? (Zestaw zmian: 82205941)
Chciałbym zrobić edycję jeszcze raz, unikając błędów, które wystąpiły.
adas_ (2020-03-16 08:44:12+00:00): Błędy poprawiłem. Cofanie zmian jest już niepotrzebne.
Z ciekawości ponawiam pytanie:
Czy możliwe jest cofnięcie wprowadzonych zmian?
Kto mógłby w tym pomóc?
Pozdrawiam
mapman44 (2020-03-15 13:03:07+00:00): Your reversion disconnected some things I had worked on. Was it necessary to revert everything, or could just the things that looked bad have been deleted? When you revert make sure how it's going to affect other people's work. Thanks.
mapman44 (2020-03-27 21:41:36+00:00): It's not good practice to ignore comments from other mappers.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82205962
camelCaseNick (2020-03-15 00:15:23+00:00): Sorry, this is about the lake Ichkeul. The wikidata item is correct though.
mapman44 (2020-03-31 13:25:42+00:00): Your highway=crossing edits are causing validation errors. Please review the Wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#Examples
FreedSky (2020-07-16 02:15:43+00:00): junction 默认都不渲染，而且感觉是给道岔用的。
Negreheb (2020-03-15 11:32:31+00:00): Warum änderst du hier den name=* des Rathauses auf einen falschen Wert?
SomeoneElse (2020-03-17 19:39:32+00:00): For info, I'm doing a full revert of this user's recent changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82316303 . Current block message https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 .
JezCrow (2020-03-16 00:54:39+00:00): Hi Wibblejunior, thank you for adding the X93 route to OSM. I have a query though - when I travelled on this route last summer it went through Aislaby. Is it missing out Aislaby now?
Kind regards,
Jez
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
bxl-forever (2020-03-21 12:38:29+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.
About the operator tag, is there a reason to use French-only names for devices in Brussels?  Official entities, such as municipalities or regional entities should be bilingual.

Example: node 7295757739, operator="Commune de Berchem Sainte Agathe" → rather "Commune de Berchem Sainte Agathe - Gemeente Sint-Agatha-Berchem"
Vucod (2020-03-22 11:23:56+00:00): Hello,
there is no reason to keep it like this. The info where collected outside of OSM by french speaking people.

That's the list of operators used in this dataset: 

- Zone de Police 5339 - Bruxelles CAPITALE Ixelles
- Bruxelles Prévention et Sécurité (BPS)               - Zone de Police 5340 - Bruxelles Ouest                - Zone de Police 5344 - Bruxelles Nord                 - Zone de Police 5341 - Bruxelles Midi                 - Police fédérale
- Administration communale d'Uccle                      - MOBIRIS 
- Administration communale de Woluwe-Saint-Lambert     
- Administration Communale Koekelberg                   - Commune de Berchem Sainte Agathe                      - Zone de Police 5343 - Bruxelles Montgomery     
- Commune d'Etterbeek      
- Commune de Woluwe-Saint-Pierre                         - Administration communale de Jette                      - Zone de Police 5339 - Bruxelles CAPITALE Ixelles  
- Polbru 
- Bruxelles   
- Administration communale de Ganshoren                  - Dilbeek    
- Schaerbeek 
- Sint-Pieters-Leeuw    
- Overijse + Police fédérale                             - Centre Hospitalier Jean Titeca                         - Zone de Police 5340 - Bruxelles Ouest                  - Bruxelles Prévention et Sécurité (BPS)                 - Woluwé 
- Administration communale d'Uccle                       
- Admnistration communale d'Ixelles                      
- Etterbeek

I could update the operator tags of the dataset with a mapping (on the not changed nodes) but I'm not sure about every translation
Vucod (2020-04-12 10:50:52+00:00): The values of the key operator have been updated: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83423424#map=10/51.0097/4.5716
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
ralley (2020-03-15 04:36:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Rather than putting the bus stop number in the name field the typical system in NZ is to put it in the ref field.  Typically name is used to hold the descriptive name if there is one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82207564
skquinn (2020-03-15 16:49:52+00:00): Why does the bounding box stretch across portions of 15 states, including a large chunk of Texas?
AgusQui (2020-03-29 04:44:19+00:00): El tren de la costa no es un tranvía, es un tren liviano
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-07-01 19:27:14+00:00): Haven't checked the Bacoor LGU website yet, but is the one-way scheme (since ECQ) still in effect?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
user_10666051 (2020-03-15 05:27:25+00:00): dont revert my stuff
Dr Kludge (2020-03-15 08:00:16+00:00): Dude. I have contacted the data working group. At this point you do not understand that you are making bad changes to the map. The can be improved. However, now you are resorting to childish vandalism of surveyed data.
Dr Kludge (2020-03-15 07:56:47+00:00): Dude. I have contacted the data working group. At this point you do not understand that you are making bad changes to the map. The can be improved. However, now you are resorting to childish vandalism of surveyed data.
Dr Kludge (2020-03-15 07:54:10+00:00): Dude.  I have contacted the data working group.  At this point you do not understand that you are making bad changes to the map.  The can be improved.  However, now you are resorting to childish vandalism of surveyed data.
mapman44 (2020-03-28 05:54:48+00:00): Looks like something went wrong with the reversion. Check out Node: 2821297477
HubMiner (2022-08-28 02:04:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4321030107/history

Hi, I see you changed tags:
phone -> contact:phone
website -> contact:website

Can you share what is the standard / guidance you followed, indicating that the new tags are preferred? Is there a global move to change tags this way?  Can downstream applications recognize the new tags?

Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-08-28 04:17:38+00:00): Hello! I hope we agree that the original variant with prefix website, which I also mentioned in the change set comment, is wrong. 

I do not accept the (also at the time of the change) long outdated statement that the keys facebook and contact:facebook are not equal. 

Some contact information is also only available in the contact scheme, including the key contact:tripadvisor (see also taginfo.osm.org). There is also a preferred working theory to make the two naming options consistent. 

I see no need to question this change.
HubMiner (2022-09-02 21:37:26+00:00): Hi, I don't have objections to switching the scheme as long as majority of editors make the jump. I submitted a proposal to ID to improve the prefixed key support.
Best regards.
HubMiner (2022-09-02 21:38:55+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9259
SomeoneElse (2024-01-23 01:54:13+00:00): Another puzzle - "historic=tower" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10837218/history seems unlikely - or have I just misunderstood what it is?
trial (2025-11-25 17:39:05+00:00): Salut, il y a comme un copier/coller sur le name de Bae Din ;-). https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5686106150
abakus_uploader (2020-03-15 23:34:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Владимир К (2022-10-16 10:14:56+00:00): не надо навешивать теги учреждения(детского сада, школы) на само здание, если территория вокруг уже отмечена соответствующе. это дублирование, приходится за вами исправлять
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-17 19:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82316303 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 for more information.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-08-08 10:45:19+00:00): occhio! La SS14 collega Trieste con Venezia!
Ionut Paduretu (2025-01-11 16:45:04+00:00): Buona osservazione, grazie per la vigilanza
Hjart (2020-03-15 19:15:26+00:00): Bemærk at det som regel er en ringe ide at fjerne vejen på den ene side af pullerten, da dette også vil forhindre at cyklister og fodgængere kan routes den vej.
Angivelse af pullerten alene bør være nok til at forhindre bilnavigation gennem den.
DonGaston (2020-03-15 10:03:12+00:00): Source: https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/presse/pressemitteilungen/2020/pressemitteilung.906338.php