piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dino Michelini (2018-05-29 13:46:50+00:00): La realtà di Viterbo è pressoché unica in Italia (meriterebbe una visita) quindi fare confronti con altre città solo su basi statistiche è fuorviante. Alley è possibile tradurlo in "vicolo" e anche la wiki indica di taggare in questo modo i vicoli medievali  highway=service/alley https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley. Anche in Josm se vuoi inserire alley devi selezionare necessariamente highway=service. Purtroppo, OSM è un progetto che nasce in realtà ben diverse dall'Italia e personalmente avrei visto meglio un tag più appropriato;  residential e troppo generico e non sufficientemente rappresentativo di un vicolo medioevale di 2m scarsi privo di marciapiedi, con profferli a iosa e restringimenti dati da accessi, gradini, ecc.. D’altra parte anche la mappatura dei sentieri ha un problema simile: in GB indicano con sentiero quello che in Italia chiamiamo carrareccia/strada bianca, mentre da noi quando parliamo di un sentiero ci si riferisce ad una cosa molto diversa... ma questo passa il convento.
Commodoortje (2016-05-01 20:30:30+00:00): Vermoedelijk is dit een doodlopende weg.
De node is gekoppeld aan een landuse, dit is niet wenselijk.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/45457789
Zerrossetto (2016-11-01 12:50:15+00:00): Confermo che è Darkmoto è chiuso, ricordati però che in generale rispetto a una cancellazione è considerato migliore utilizzare il prefisso "disused:", vedi l'entry della wiki corrispondente:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
Cercherò magari di tradurre l'entry per renderla più fruibile a chi non conosce l'inglese.
opendcc (2016-04-29 15:20:24+00:00): Halllo,

es wäre wünschenswert, wenn da einem Knoten ein bischen mehr als nur der Name dran hängt. Was ist das? Shop, Office, Kirche, Hauptstadt? Vielen Dank fürs Ergänzen.
scanco81 (2016-05-02 08:09:34+00:00): Hab es ergänzt - passt das so?
opendcc (2016-05-02 08:38:27+00:00): Hallo,

jetzt hat es Adresse und weitere Infos. Gut. Was aber noch fehlt, ist eine Klassifizierung, also was es ist. Schau mal bei http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office , was da am besten paßt. Vielleicht educational_institution wenn es nur das Büro ist. Wenn da auch Freizeit oder so ist, dann ev. mit Tag amenity oder leisure.

Servus
alphensebezorger (2016-11-27 14:45:19+00:00): Hallo Dutch Mapper,
Deze multipolygon heeft alleen maar een outer, en bovendien geen tags die aangeven wat het is, kan volgens mij dan wel gewist worden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4541779
Mee eens?
Groet Alphensebezorger.
Aggregaat02 (2016-11-27 15:06:18+00:00): Klopt, ik ben het er mee eens. Ik zie in de history van de relatie dat ik er een half jaar geleden alleen de tag name=Winkelcentrum Wassenaar heb afgehaald. De multipolygon zelf, heb ik laten staan. Ik ga hem meteen verwijderen.
Nakaner (2016-04-29 10:06:03+00:00): User muhmuh deleted some address nodes in the reverted changesets because he replaced them by addr:*=* at the buildings. His building addresses have been reverted because they were copied from an illegal data source. The redact by pnorman only removed those building addresses but did not revert the changesets fully.

See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=590589#p590589
Athalis (2016-05-19 00:00:52+00:00): It looks like this changeset restored a node that had been deleted in the meantime, see this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/556729 and the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2323943998
Athalis (2016-05-19 00:16:37+00:00): Sorry, I had the impression the mentioned node was imported from BürgerGIS and was restored accidentally. Nothing wrong with this changeset..
SomeoneElse (2016-05-03 12:33:40+00:00): Rather than just using a changeset comment of "tagging" here it would be much more useful if you actually described the change that you made :)
Pavlo Holovko (2016-04-29 10:15:04+00:00): Не бачу необхідності додавати будинки відповідно до планування, посилаючись на занадто різне планування та прибудови. Тому компоную карту населеного пункту типовими полігонами-будинками, що позначають фактичні одиничні домогосподарства. Прибудови не враховуються
Владимир К (2016-05-12 08:51:11+00:00): что значит шестерка? местное название части?
SK53 (2021-07-27 08:25:52+00:00): Presumably the construction=bus_stop is long finished.
kevjs1982 (2021-11-03 18:21:14+00:00): Yup.  Fixed.
Serzhanya (2016-05-01 07:47:33+00:00): Admin_level=3 in Russia is used for federal districts, not for disputed territories. Check http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1029256     http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1221148     etc.
jeffhaack (2016-05-01 11:27:54+00:00): Yes, sorry, the change to North Caucasus Federal District (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/389344) I made by mistake when correcting South Ossetia.  I have reverted it.  In the South Caucasus, admin_level=3 is used for disputed territories, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
DavidNC78 (2016-04-29 11:33:25+00:00): Thanks for correcting the map error I submitted!  :)
DD1GJ (2016-04-29 19:46:29+00:00): Hallo henryx, ich habe diesen Änderungssatz bis auf den geschlossenen Bio-Laden komlett zurückgesetzt. Hauptgrund war der wohl versehentlich verschobene Fußgängerüberweg, der durch die mitgezogenen Straßen und Wege erhebliche Auswirkungen hatte. Privatwege sind Bestandteil der Karte, sie werden mit access=private gekennzeichnet. Der Pizzabote freut sich, wenn er sieht, wie er zu dem Haus ganz hinten kommt.
pgiraud (2016-04-29 14:31:09+00:00): My changeset comment was completely wrong. Sorry for the noise.
mapsru (2016-05-11 14:37:46+00:00): These chnages are incorrect - you removed the ref and added a destination:ref on this way.
1) This way needs the ref of I 495.
2) The previous way has the destination:ref of I 495 where the actual split occurs - this way does not need the destination:ref
I updated both of these issues
Hjart (2016-04-29 17:20:20+00:00): Jeg undrede mig over at du har lavet så mange parkeringsbåse i dag og kan så konstatere at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking_space i iD er noget uheldigt oversat. Jeg har skrevet et indlæg på vores postliste i håb om at vedkommende der har lavet "bøffen" får lavet det om.
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-05-02 09:40:19+00:00): Ja, jeg har godt undret mig over at det er lidt tilfældigt om der er brugt parking eller parking_space rundt omkring i landet. Men hvis parking_space betyder 1 parkeringsboks, burde den nærmest ikke benyttes jo. Skal jeg ændre mine data?
Hjart (2016-05-02 09:49:41+00:00): Jeg har ændret en del af dem allerede og oversættelsen er ændret også (og skulle gå "live" med næste udgave af iD).

I visse tilfælde (som f.eks. ved handicapbåse eller reserverede båse) kan parking_space være en god ide.
Hjart (2016-05-02 10:03:25+00:00): Ok, du har ret i at det godt måske godt kunne betale sig at gennemgå de eksisterende parking_space: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fZZ

Jeg kan se at der findes eksempler på nummerede båse også, så der er altså legitime anvendelser.
Hjart (2016-05-02 10:29:48+00:00): Jeg kan se amenity=parking_space ikke bliver renderet på vores standard kort
Владимир К (2016-05-11 07:13:28+00:00): никаких веломагазинов в названии быть не должно быть. только имя собственное без кавычек. Телефон пишется в формате +7 978 8012949;+7 978 8010318, если несколько то через точку с запятой, сайты пишутся полностью, с http://
smaprs (2016-04-30 03:18:33+00:00): Sorry, this changeset was meant to be tagged as "Import fo buildings". This import of buildings was discussed in talk-br list and documented here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Porto_Alegre,_Rio_Grande_do_Sul/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_PMPA.
literan (2016-04-30 13:04:00+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за ваши правки! Может, вы как местный житель, сможете прояснить вопросы, описанные в заметках здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/55.3995/37.7793&layers=N ?
Владимир К (2016-05-11 07:07:04+00:00): Не нужно писать слово меломагазин в название веломагазина!
Владимир К (2016-05-11 06:59:53+00:00): не надо писать в название категорию
BeKri (2016-05-04 08:38:26+00:00): Ich denek nicht,
dass es Dir zusteht Bemerkungen wie
"Asotzialer Spielplatz (30913779, v3)"
geh aber davon aus das die Schreibweise
asozial ist .
Nimm diese Bemerkung bitte sofort raus !
user_5359 (2016-04-29 17:06:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete this highway? The building still exists? And please use the changeset comment.
Paul Dube (2016-04-29 17:08:28+00:00): Thank you.
Yes, the building exists, and has been expanded. The roadway is a private driveway for building occupants use only.
Sorry, I should have commented.
przemas75 (2016-08-10 08:45:59+00:00): Piszesz imagery_used geoportal, a w komentarzu "google maps". Korzystanie z google nie jest dozwolone.
szutkes (2016-08-10 09:13:29+00:00): A to nie widziałem, że mamy Chiny w Polsce, że oglądanie pewnych stron w internecie nie jest dozwolone... Na przyszłość nie będę pisał co oglądam.
A to imagery_used to chyba dodaje sam osm?
A czy merytorycznie coś źle dodałem? Staram się być wiarygodny....
przemas75 (2016-08-10 15:10:13+00:00): Nie rozumiem Ciebie. Napisałem, że nie możemy korzystać z google imagery/maps.
Po prostu nie możemy i już. Jeśli nie wierzysz, możesz to na własną rękę zweryfikować z innymi osobami. Skontaktuj się z ludźmi ze Stowarzyszenia OSM Polska albo z fundacją Openstreetmap. Mi rzecz jasna nie musisz na słowo ufać, ale nie rozumiem podejścia "prześmiewcy". Chiny to są wtedy, kiedy sie coś kradnie - jeśli już uzyć Twojej argumentacji.
Regulamin google maps zabrania na skorzystanie z ich danych, za które zapłacili.
Nic nie pisałem o merytoryce Twoich edycji przecież, raczej chyba są całkiem dobre. Przede wszystkim mocno aktualne (jako mieszkaniec rejonów).

Jeśli już chcesz korzystać z innych podkładów, polecam _wszystkie_ z gis gdańskiego - na co mamy zgodę, bo sam się o to postarałem w rozmowie z panią naczelnik wydziału.
Chociaż akurat orto tam jest z tego co pamiętam taki sam jak geoportal gugika.
szutkes (2016-08-10 16:21:54+00:00): Reasumując: 1) nie chciałem Ciebie urazić, dziękuję za Twoje uwagi; 2) nie będę już pisał, że opieram się z google maps.
A generalnie temat jest na większą rzeczową dyskusję (nie kłótnię). Bo zapewne są argumenty za i przeciw.
Commodoortje (2016-04-29 18:02:25+00:00): Je hebt de wegen van de parkeerplaats netjes aangebracht, maar de contouren van de parkeerplaats zelf nog niet.
amenity=parking
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking
Commodoortje (2016-04-29 18:07:23+00:00): Je hebt de oude contouren weggehaald, je had ze kunnen aanpassen naar de juiste contouren. 
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=89136822

amenity=parking
fee=no
name=Kloosterland
Aggregaat02 (2016-04-30 10:40:32+00:00): Ik heb het bijgewerkt.
Commodoortje (2016-05-02 06:10:57+00:00): Probeer er in de toekomst voor te zorgen dat de nodes op de ingangen van de parkeerplaats alleen versmolten zijn met de parkeerplaats. Nu heb je hetzelfde als met highway en landuse, het is niet verstandig om parkeerplaatsen geheel met de serviceweg te versmelten. In werkelijkheid ligt de parkeerplaats ook een stukje van de serviceweg af.
DD1GJ (2016-05-02 22:11:56+00:00): Wegen Vandalismis zurückgesetzt, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39049328
Commodoortje (2016-04-29 17:56:11+00:00): Je zou nog wat specifieke tags kunnen toevoegen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Aggregaat02 (2016-04-30 10:41:41+00:00): Ik heb een aantal tags toegevoegd.
smootheFiets (2020-11-30 11:44:26+00:00): Hoi Leon, je hebt toen smoking=outside getagged bij de Uurwerker (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3936126884). Weet je toevallig of dat nog klopt? Ik denk haast van niet, maar ik ben er al een tijdje niet meer geweest. En nu met Corona kan het sowieso niet :(
BushmanK (2016-04-30 00:02:54+00:00): А вы уверены, что там от этих путей вообще что-то осталось сейчас?
SOSM (2016-04-30 10:34:59+00:00): Hallo Melanie
Du solltest die Hausnummer hier in ein seperates Attribut (addr:housenumber) packen und nit direkt in den Wert für die Strasse.

Gruss
Владимир К (2016-05-08 08:42:00+00:00): А где расположена старозенитная улица?
literan (2016-04-30 12:50:28+00:00): Обращаю внимание, что вы здесь половину тегов от Мегафона оставили.
stepps00 (2016-04-29 18:36:50+00:00): added colour tag based on route_master
geoaria (2018-02-16 08:17:08+00:00): Hello
You unfortunately have traveled routes that are not related to a different island like an island. What is the reason for drawing these useless routes?
It's best to identify and correct errors with your website.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
user_5359 (2016-04-30 11:15:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your POI, I think these building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414605254#map=19/32.39624/-110.99446 can be the fuel.
user_5359 (2016-04-30 10:50:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice, that you forgot to add any information to your line. Because I can't see any object on the aerial image match to your object, I delete this.
streckenkundler (2016-04-30 09:30:41+00:00): Den Hammergraben würde ich nicht als sidestream zur Nuthe ansehen. Es ist lediglich eine Zuflußgewässer. Sidestream bezeichnet meiner Ansicht nach einen Gewässerlauf, der vom Fluß abzweigt und sich dann wieder mit dem Fluß vereinigt. So können z.B. Altarmschleifen als Sidestream angesehen werden. Diverse Nebengewässer der Spree z.B. im Unterspreewald könnten als sidestream zur Spree angesehen werden, von einer Erfassiung rate ich aber dringend ab, da man einerseits in Sammelrelationsnähe kommt und ich das Sidestream-Konzept für den Spreewald als nicht logisch halte (Mix aus künstlichen und natürlichen Gewässern, Stauhaltung, unterschiedliche Fließziele der Gewässer.Vgl. auch englisches Wiki:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

Sven
glibbertorsten (2016-04-30 10:49:54+00:00): Hi! Danke für den Hinweis, 
Ich hab das Wiki falsch verstanden und da kam der blinde Eifer in mir hoch. Danke für den Hinweis!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38996936
skorasaurus (2016-04-29 19:58:55+00:00): congratulations, it's your 1,000th changset!
tuxfuzz (2016-05-19 21:51:30+00:00): Salve!! In questo caso il cimitero è già stato taggato come area. Anche se non visibile nella mappa con il nome "cimitero" in realtà il cimitero stesso è presente come dato nel database.
In questa pagina può trovare alcune informazioni sulle convenzioni da utilizzare: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions 

Riporto qui la convenzione relativa a questo caso: " Un elemento, un oggetto di OSM

Non piazzare nodi all'interno di aree che abbiano gli stessi attributi solo perché al centro di essi appaia un'icona (come alcuni fanno per i parcheggi). I renderer mostreranno comunque l'icona se è prevista. Non serve a niente avere ogni singolo parcheggio, campo da calcio o altro due volte nel database solo per motivi estetici. "
Grazie per il suo contributo al progetto OSM e.... Buona mappatura!!
Hjart (2016-04-29 18:09:40+00:00): Hvis du har "konstruktiv kritik" er det en god ide at kommentere det "skyldige" rettesæt. Du kan ikke forvente at hun nogensinde læser titlen på dette rettesæt.
Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (2016-05-01 09:15:23+00:00): Jeg ved det egentligt godt, men jeg har det for rart i JOSM(den minder på den gode måde om værktøjer til software udvikling) så det er sjældent jeg for læst her, medmindre emnet har været oppe på talk-dk, som jeg regelmæssigt læser, og vurdere hvornår jeg vil bidrage(ofte har det held at andre fremføre argumenter som jeg ligeså godt kunne havde valgt).
Brian@Brea (2016-05-01 07:03:30+00:00): please be careful in the future of editing large areas in iD editor. It creates multipolygonals which make a larger mess down the road. Split ways carefully or use another editor in the future. I prefer to use potlatch for the clean use of ways editing.
Brian@Brea (2016-05-01 07:04:26+00:00): I have fixed the changes to Frontierland and construction boundaries and have changed some of them to fit the new land boundaries
whb (2016-05-01 10:05:12+00:00): highway=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452594365
changchun_1 (2016-05-01 18:52:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Wie das da reinkam ist mir auch ein Rätsel.
changchun_1 (2016-05-01 18:52:32+00:00): Hab es korrigiertt
sheldonelectric (2026-03-08 19:29:57+00:00): Privet, what is the source or the name:ru?
sheldonelectric (2026-04-20 15:56:03+00:00): You confused Φ with Θ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1776180818 I assume you made it all up.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-20 16:10:58+00:00): And οι is not ои https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1776180802/
Владимир К (2016-05-11 07:20:37+00:00): Пожалуйста, пройдите по всем своим мозданным магазинам, уберите слово веломагазин и кавычки из названий, приведите телефонные номера, сайты и адреса в соответствие с документацией
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
RicoElectrico (2018-01-04 22:32:54+00:00):  http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258258#c2615846 

Ustosunkowałbyś się do tego?
Commodoortje (2016-05-03 09:36:06+00:00): Wauteurz,
Waarom heb je een groot gebouw aangebracht bij Station Doetinchem de Huet?
Hier staat volgens de BAG geen gebouw. Wil je wat uitleg geven hierover?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413898864

https://www.dropbox.com/s/uxz4dte2mk9onml/2016-05-03_11-34-12.png?raw=1
skorasaurus (2016-04-29 20:03:59+00:00): 
Before anyone reverts this in a rash manner because I deleted some previously important main roads and ways; please contact me. Ontario Street running between Frankfort and South Broadway is now permanently closed; West superior between west roadway and jesse owens way is only one road when it re-opens. (note Public Square is not reopened yet, but most of the construction has completed)
user_5359 (2016-04-30 07:09:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A street without any connection to an other street isn't a good street :). If have check and cleanup the situation. I hope is map is correct now.
fx99 (2020-04-02 07:18:36+00:00): die Kollektoren sehen auf dem Luftbild eher nach Photovoltaic aus.
Jojo4u (2021-03-22 21:23:03+00:00): Sind Kollektoren, die wurden 2009 erneuert: https://docplayer.org/78945504-Die-erneuerung-der-kollektorfelder-hat-begonnen.html
Jojo4u (2021-03-22 21:24:31+00:00): Hier noch ein Link ;) https://www.solar-district-heating.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/20150209_SolnetBWI_Anlagensteckbrief_Burgholzhof.pdf
fx99 (2021-03-23 07:31:41+00:00): Da hast Du wohl recht.
eggie (2021-03-10 09:48:20+00:00): Dag Wauterz.. Het is al weer even geleden.. Svp geen wegen vastplakken aan de landuse. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar voor anderen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38988550
MVG
eggie
smaprs (2016-04-30 03:29:17+00:00): Por que você deletou a relação do gasoduto? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4202684. Encontrou algum problema? Se sim, deveria ter contado quem editou primeiramente, para verificar o que houve, como o OSM recomenda.
smaprs (2016-04-30 04:21:32+00:00): Colocar comentário no changeset indicando o que editou é importante por isto, também.
natinacio (2016-05-02 12:24:53+00:00): Bom dia Smaprs, quando passei o validor no josm deu algum erro e esse relação deu conflito e foi apagado, mas só acrescentei uma via e troquei a ref da ligação entre a sp-060 e sp-070, vou recuperar a relação (4202684, v33), ok.
natinacio (2016-05-02 12:25:28+00:00): Me desculpe se fiz alguma alteração errada
smaprs (2016-05-02 12:29:00+00:00): Ok, já consertei. É importante ter em conta que nem tudo o que o validador do JOSM aponta como alerta é erro. Há falsos positivos, o validador não está sempre atualizado com todas as possibilidades. Ele apenas avisa, e tem que se examinar caso a caso, não automaticamente.
user_5359 (2016-04-30 07:03:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database and not a test or playground database. To add a marker please inform you about the possibilities of map box and don't fill the OSM database with private / project information.
esurany (2016-05-01 00:54:47+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean when you say "To add a marker please inform you about the possibilities of map box and don't fill the OSM database with private / project information." What do you mean by private? See, I went in to add a point giving more details for a new condo building, and I also added a point for a nearby restaurant as well. I plan to add additional points in this area, as many points of interest are not present, and I can help out with that. I noticed the missing points from building with mapbox (points of interest data is pulled directly from OSM). Please advise how I should proceed in contributing additional points (mainly shops and restaurants, and a new condo building at  341 sackett street)? Thank you very much.
user_5359 (2016-05-01 18:35:44+00:00): You can add information, but the name of a building isn't a combination of street and house number. And if you want to label a map, you can set labels on your privat map, generated from the OSM data or using the OSM tiles (from the main map or others) and additional information. Please search for javascript libraries like leaflet (http://leafletjs.com) or openlayers (http://openlayers.org).

For tagging the building you can use operator (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator) or (found in taginfo.openstreetmap.org) estate. 

Why you should fill the map wit private or project information? Remember, when everyone his house would named with HOME, this would be useless information.
esurany (2016-05-02 14:24:47+00:00): Ah I see. Unfortunately, the name of the building IS the address in this case, and in the case of many NYC buildings of this kind (for example 1407 Broadway, 1001 Sixth Avenue, 1400 broadway, and many many more). They are labeled as such and are POI's, as they should be, because these are no ordinary house numbers — they are buildings/ destinations. Provided I understand this is not very good nomenclature for OSM — perhaps a label like "The Townhouse Condominiums
At 341 Sackett" is more suitable, though not ideal, and quite frankly a discrepancy if other buildings are labeled with their address? Additionally, it is important that this destination shows as a POI on more than private/proprietary maps, and shows as a point of interest (just like many other building POIs). Adding a point via Javascript is therefor an ineffective workaround, that only gets this point to show on private maps. Because 341 Sackett is not an ordinary home, and is a new condominium development, it needs to be distinguished as such. I am not sure tagging the building with operator or estate is helpful to making this building a point of interest like so many other NYC buildings are, but thank you for the suggestions. I hope this information, and examples, clarifiy my intentions. That said, I am re-adding the POI point with a new name more acceptable to OSM. Thank you.
glibbertorsten (2016-10-05 09:46:19+00:00): you made the situation from poor to bad. At first a whole block was a single building but at leat visible on the map. Now its just a place without any buildings at all...
n76 (2016-04-30 20:27:02+00:00): Regarding ways http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414505825 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414505827

These look like the knock out the McGill and Chula Vista campgrounds as well as part of the Chula Vista parking area from the forest. As a volunteer on that mountain that does not seem right to me.
user_633163 (2016-04-29 22:13:28+00:00): landuse=retailを外す理由は何でしょうか？
bizen241 (2016-04-30 00:44:56+00:00): 「landuse=retail」は商業施設が集積した区域に付けるタグでして, 個別の商業施設は, 「building=retail」な領域と, 「shop=*」なノードの組み合わせで表現したほうが良いからです.
bizen241 (2016-04-30 00:48:49+00:00): 「1つの地物は1つの要素で」と合わせて, PostGISとかで, データベースとして利用する時に便利だからかなと思います. 他にも理由はあるかもしれません.
bizen241 (2016-04-30 00:49:26+00:00): こちらのWikiページ(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:landuse%3Dretail)もご覧下さい.
bizen241 (2016-04-30 00:51:41+00:00): Markdownに対応してるんですね...
リンク貼り直しますね.
[JA:Tag:landuse=retail](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:landuse%3Dretail)
bizen241 (2016-04-30 00:52:14+00:00): いや, 対応してないみたいです.
すみません.