piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zabir91 (2019-05-25 17:34:01+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
eggie (2019-05-25 08:24:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-05-25 08:27:51+00:00): Je vraagt om een review..
Dit waren je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70606115

Je hebt op de adresnode de info toegevoegd. Dat is correct. 
Echter op de hoek van het gebouwtje zie ik een node met nog een keer het adres en de info. Dat is dubbel.
Verder heb je alle steigers weggehaald van de kaart.
waarom?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-25 08:39:46+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #70606728
eggie (2019-05-25 08:44:57+00:00): De leisure=marina is al getagd op de kaart. 
Niet dubbel taggen svp. Wanneer nr 25  werkelijk nr 23 is en nr Sophiaboulevard 23 niet bestaat kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster.
Dat alle steigers zouden zijn verdwenen lijkt mij niet waarschijnlijk. Ik heb deze edits teruggezet.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
svp niet zomaar edits van andere mappers verwijderen.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-25 08:48:54+00:00): Info Roompot Marina Yacht Service  heb ik op de adresnode geplaatst.
thijssu (2019-06-27 11:00:51+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor je feedback en de wijzigingen. 

De reden dat ik de steigers verwijderd had is dat de indeling nu niet klopt, dit is een oude indeling gecombineerd met de nieuwe indeling, is het mogelijk om dit aan te passen? De nieuwe indeling is te zien op een luchtfoto van na 2015.

Ook zou ik graag de boksen (ligplaatsen) intekenen en de nummers erbij zetten op de kaart zodat ik deze kaart kan embedden op de site van de haven.  Weet jij of dit mogelijk is?

Alvast bedankt,

Thijs
eggie (2019-06-27 13:11:51+00:00): Dag Thijs
De laatste pdok luchtfoto is van medio 2018. Dat is toch echt van na 2015. Wellicht heb je toch een andere achtergrond gebruikt. Ik zie dat je de standaardkaart gebruikt..maar je moet de pdok actueel gebruiken. Het was dus uptodate. Niet zomaar iets weghalen svp want dan gaat de historie verloren en nog veel meer belangrijke zaken. Www.satellietdataportaal.nl geeft de situatie van maart 2019 weer. Daar dus ook even kijken.
De huidige ligging van de steigers staat zo ook in de BGT. Dat is de officiele site van de overheid.
Die boxen intekenen met nr zou vast wel kunnen. Zelf zit ik even zonder editor dus kan even nu niets uitproberen. Je kunt het best even advies vragen op het forum van osm.  Kijk ook even in de wiki bij marina. 
Voor de "links"  zie je welkomstmail.
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Mvg.. Eggie
mueschel (2019-05-26 10:48:15+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You added many "payment" tags here that are not used in any other place. OSM only works, if everybody uses the same, documented tags. Everything else can not be understood by other mappers and any software. Please have a look to the wiki to read about the common tags, e.g. here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
eggie (2019-05-25 08:28:33+00:00): Dit lijkt me correct
eggie (2019-05-25 08:31:15+00:00): Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits Kaart volledig maken begrijpt niemand.
Je hebt nu twee adresssen nr 23. Voorheen was dit nr 25 Alle adresgegevens zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Het is niet verstandig om aan Adresnodes van het Kadaster te sleutelen
Nr 23 komt nu 3x voor op de kaart en 25 is verdwenen Waarom deze actie?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-05-25 08:39:21+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #70606708
eggie (2019-05-25 08:56:41+00:00): Wanneer adressen niet kloppen svp een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster. Niet zelf adressen veranderen svp.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=sophiaboulevard%2025&resultOffset=0&objectId=1695200000011474&geometry.x=39395&geometry.y=401598&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1695010000004591
eggie (2019-05-25 08:33:01+00:00): Gebouwen krijgen in OSM nooit adresgegevens. Deze bevinden zich al op de adresnodes. Niet nog een keer een adres toevoegen aan een gebouw.
Het lijkt me beter om de laatste  twee changesets terug te draaien.

ook graag antwoord waarom je de steigers hebt verwijderd
Graag reactie,
eggie
eggie (2019-05-25 08:38:57+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #70606694
eggie (2019-05-25 08:52:12+00:00): Wanneer dit het Havenkantoor is zou je die naam op het gebouw kunnen zetten.
BrackoNe (2019-06-05 08:46:53+00:00): Ćao.

Vidim da si track konvertovao u service road. Ostavio si da je surface dirt. Ako je zaista dirt, onda je bilo obavezno da se skloni tracktype kada si konvertovao iz track u service.
Molim te popravi to.
iriman (2019-06-02 13:48:05+00:00): سلام. منبع این ویرایش چیه؟ منظور از 20142014 را نفهمیدم. تصاویر هوایی سال ۲۰۱۴؟
jpennycook (2019-05-25 20:29:39+00:00): Hello.

In this changeset, you broke a public right of way and a signposted cycle route by deleting the ways marked as "designation=byway_open_to_all_traffic" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583335479/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345630796/history) and replacing them with a way marked access=private.  The deleted ways are visible on the imagery.

I've restored the deleted ways.

Jon
rrkum (2019-07-03 05:16:52+00:00): Hi Jon,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The features got deleted accidentally. We will make sure that this wont happen in coming future. Thanks for reverting/adding  the features back. 

Please let us know if there are any other suggestions.

Regards,
rrkum
hatul (2025-07-07 15:46:51+00:00): התמונה הועתקה מהאתר של מסלולים ישראל. נא להימנע מהפרת זכויות יוצרים.
https://www.maslulim-israel.co.il/tracks/%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%A7%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%A1/
BrackoNe (2019-05-27 07:59:13+00:00): Zdravo Arhijakon,

Molim te za objašnjenje zašto si izmenio ovaj deo, kada je sve bilo urađeno pod konac? Svaka traka je bila navedena, isto tako je bilo postavljeno odakle dokle je toll put (odnosno put sa naplatnom putarine), informacije o promenama traka i slično. Vidim da koristiš iD editor gde nemaš uopšte informacije o trakama, tako da si sada napravio rezance od puteva, molim te da revertuješ svoje promene i vratiš na staro stanje.

Srdačan pozdrav,
Nemanja
Hjart (2019-05-25 09:18:53+00:00): This was a duplicate of an existing entry here and has thus been removed
Adamant1 (2019-05-28 02:57:39+00:00): Hi there. I noticed on a few places like the shopping center that you only tagged things as shop=yes. If you know what kind of shops they are, you should probably tag them with a more specific tag. As rendering for shop=yes is being removed from the style pretty soon here.  There also seems to be a few places just tagged with names. It would be good if those got more specific tags also. 

Thanks.
zyphlar (2019-05-29 03:23:55+00:00): @Adamant1: thanks I've been learning more about the proper way to tag things and went through a spat where I thought lots of POIs was a good idea. In this case I probably knew there was a business here but not what the exact name was, so my goal was to use it as a placeholder that an app like streetcomplete could fill in the details of. But the reality seems to be somewhat different so I plan to change these as appropriate when I have time.
Adamant1 (2019-06-10 01:27:28+00:00): No worries. Mapping practices are always an evolving thing. I appreciate that your willing to learn as you go along and improve things where you can. No hurry. I'll probably add more details around here to when I get the time.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-24 10:41:07+00:00): Please don't connect areas along roads
AkuAnakTimur (2019-05-25 09:53:52+00:00): Names: it's like Parkson (百盛).

For example, Google Maps by default would only display Parkson but searching for "百盛" would work too. name:zh=* tag will do it
AkuAnakTimur (2019-05-25 09:54:48+00:00): As always, if this matter should be discussed further, feel free to open a new topic in the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=60
Dimacn (2019-05-25 16:04:24+00:00): Не следует использовать объект типа парк отдыха для оформления дворовой территории. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите эти парки с выдуманными названиями.
ajf3934221 (2019-05-26 08:19:46+00:00): Track auf P5 entfernt:
wird durch entfernen des Weges über den Parkplatz nicht der Dorfrundweg unterbrochen? So ist hier doch kein sinnvolles Routing zum Wegausgang an der Südostseite von P5 mehr möglich. Wieso musste der Weg gelöscht werden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70607524
ghaefele (2019-05-26 17:27:39+00:00): Ich sehe mir das nächste Woche vor Ort an und ergänze das noch bei Bedarf.
Ein Weg ist über den Parkplatz nicht sichtbar.
ajf3934221 (2019-05-26 19:39:39+00:00): Hallo Georg
nochmal, Du hast hier weitere Abstrahierungen vorgenommen, die zuvor realitätsnaher gemappt waren. 

Das ist so nicht in Ordnung: Embankment entfernt, Wald direkt an den Parkplatz herangezogen. Das war alles zuvor anhand von GPS gemappt. Bitte macht dies wieder Rückgängig. Es ist nicht in Ordnung Aufgrund von eigenen stilistischen oder vereinheitlichenden Vorstellungen der Datenbank einen Informationsverlust zuzumuten. Sogar anahnd des vogis-2018 Bildes sind diese Details erkennbar.

Grüße, 
Andy

siehe auch  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70636183#map=19/47.34643/9.88889
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70607524
iriman (2019-06-02 13:10:29+00:00): سلام. طی این ویرایش و ویرایش قبلی معابر تکراری رسم شده. برخی معابر هم روی تصاویر ماهواره‌ای دیده نمیشن. برخی هم تگ ندارن. بنده یک هفته پیش براتون پیام خصوصی فرستادم اما پاسخی دریافت نکردم. بنابراین قصد دارم این تغییرات را واگردانی کنم.
iriman (2019-06-02 13:43:11+00:00): به‌وسیلهٔ بستهٔ تغییر #70607575 واگردانی شد و یکی از مشکلات (معابر تکراری) برطرف شد.
ent8r (2019-10-21 15:27:37+00:00): Hi!
Kannst du dich eventuell noch daran erinnern, wieso du mit diesem Änderungssatz bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42089749/history den Wert access=no hinzugefügt hast? War dies nur eine temporäre Sperre des Weges oder möchtest du damit ausdrücken, dass dort keine Autos fahren dürfen?
Mathias71 (2019-10-21 15:42:11+00:00): Hallo,
es ging mir darum, dass dort keine allgemeinen Kraftfahrzeuge, sondern nur Fahrräder, Fußgänger und Landwirtschaft durch dürfen. Wahrscheinlich wäre "Motorfahrzeuge=no" besser gewesen. 
Danach habe ich das Tool http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ entdeckt, aber noch nie genutzt.
Ich habe gerade Zeit, darum fahre ich gleich mal mit dem Rad los und mache Fotos von den Schildern zwischen dem Kanzlerfeld und Ölper. Danach (noch heute Abend) versuche ich mal Grund in die Eigenschaften der ganzen Wege in dem Bereich zu bringen.
Gruß,
Mathias
ent8r (2019-10-30 17:42:41+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine umgehende Antwort! Jetzt scheint alles der momentanen Situation entsprechend getaggt zu sein. Danke für deine Hilfe!
Yunkers (2019-05-25 19:50:35+00:00): Dotyczy tego i kilku innych zestawów. W OSM rozwijamy wszystkie skróty, skrót można dać w tagu short_name.
azybro (2019-05-25 10:00:31+00:00): يوافق على اصلاحات /خیابان های محله اصغریه
gileri (2019-05-30 11:52:55+00:00): Un nouveau changeset remplaçant des données valides par n'importe quoi...

Revert ici : 70608015
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-05-25 10:06:32+00:00): this has been like this for more than 6 months 😨 this is a 'major' junction in the city of Luanda, I noticed it by happenstance
abakus_uploader (2019-05-25 22:31:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2019-05-25 13:27:29+00:00): Hello,
I've reverted this because somehow https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2611818172 got dragged into totally the wrong place.  The 2 new roads looked a bit dubious, too.
best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-05-25 13:27:56+00:00): Привет,
Я отменил это, потому что каким-то образом https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2611818172 был втянут в совершенно не то место. Две новые дороги тоже выглядели немного сомнительно.
с уважением,
Энди
Supaplex (2020-06-16 04:51:30+00:00): This is Data Working Group Dennis Speaking:

OpenStreetMap is a project real data, which is contribute by mappers around the world, which also is used by application and website around the world. So if it was just proposed plan, just use the related proposed tag, or use GIS software for your work.

It was already reverted by hot-blood mappers, so here is just a reminder for you. Please be careful for your action, it might make of big impact!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/70608438
Marych_ (2019-05-26 09:09:03+00:00): Какой?
Можете уточнить название номер?
user_6110846 (2019-06-10 08:39:49+00:00): Kiev is a violation of the rules on the ground of the project
Recently there was a discussion about the translation and DWG does not prohibit the use of the real name of the city of Kyiv 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64937230#map=8/50.381/30.715 
Comment from SomeoneElse 6 months ago
@Poliakoff Mykhailo You do get to decide, based on on-the-ground signage, what the name for Kyiv is in Ukrainian. You don't get to decide what name it is usually referred to as in other languages, unless you can find evidence for it in that language. It may well be that those other languages will adapt to using Kyiv rather than Kiev over time, just as has happened with other former "occupation names" elsewhere such as Calcutta/Kolkata . If you believe that this has actually happened, then I'd suggest that you'd need to find some evidence _in Estonian_ of Kyiv being used rather than Kiev. I'd start by looking for locally-produced tourist information leaflets which hopefully will be available under a licence suitable for use in OSM (wikipedia, alas, is not). 
Please try and engage positively with other mappers. Saying that they need to "get used to" things will not help your cause, either on this individual issue or any wider ones.

instead stead of the one invented in Moscow. Kiev
https://infothen.com/2018/05/09/its-kyiv-not-kiev-get-it-right/



The Ukrainian government threw out motorway signs from Kiev and set up signs from Kyiv in exchange.
https://www.google.com/search?q=kyiv&lr=lang_uk&tbs=lr:lang_1uk&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFsMiB8KTiAhWtlYsKHVPQCP0Q_AUIDigB&biw=1178&bih=864#imgrc=pLYxgDOCJayCGM: 
http://i.imgur.com/d255sFP.jpg
http://autoua.net/media/uploads/raznoe/89746465464.jpg

In the city, the word Kiev can be found only in the names of some firms.
Almost all touristic cityguide publishes from Kyiv
The Ukrainian government has prepared a draft law that prohibits in international agreements of firms in the use of printed materials Kiev


Feature of our project is the name on ground
Now you broke it when you wrote Kiev

Therefore, the conclusion: so that the fake name Kiev remains, you must write to the DWG and ask them for permission to violate on the ground

Without this permission, the use of Kiev is impossible and the real name kyiv will be returned to the investigator in the near future.
NikAlmino (2019-06-10 19:58:17+00:00): So put a note with the link. A user who edits little elsewhere, will not be aware of this and will put the name Kiev.

I'm going to put a note so the other mappers are aware.
Noen (2019-05-26 22:39:29+00:00): Har du oppdaget forskjellen mellom en engelsk "wood" og en "forest"?

Ellers har det vært tradisjon å bruke wood på "alt" siden vi ikke har den distinksjonen på norsk.
rivermont (2019-09-02 23:15:29+00:00): Hi,
In this changeset you added multiple buildings that overlap with your own previously added buildings. Please be more careful when editing.
Thanks,
Will
aMa-MiH (2019-05-28 16:34:59+00:00): Test Kommentar
aMa-MiH (2020-10-08 16:49:35+00:00): Test2
Zabir91 (2019-05-25 17:18:03+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
Zabir91 (2019-05-25 17:18:23+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
Florimondable (2019-05-27 14:39:43+00:00): Bonjour, je ne suis pas convaincu par le tagging. Pour moi ça serait highway=motorway et access=private.
Parce que ça reste une structurellement une autoroute et non une voie de service, avec un accès fermé au public.
didier2020 (2019-05-27 17:20:28+00:00): bonsoir,
elle ne reste pas une route :
http://www.montreuil.fr/outils/actualites/article/fermeture-definitive-de-la-a186-les-travaux-de-prolongement-du-tramway-t1-commencent/
Florimondable (2019-05-28 08:17:38+00:00): Openstreetmap doit refléter la réalité à ce jour pas le futur ni le passé. Aujourd'hui j'imagine (je ne suis pas allé sur le terrain mais votre lien me confirme cela) que l'autoroute et encore en presque totalité à l'état d'autoroute, elle n'est pas encore déconstruite. Et le tramway et l'avenue ne sont pas non plus encore sortis de terre. C'est pour cela je pense qu'il est préférable de garder le tagging motorway le temps qu'elle se fasse déconstruire, puis ensuite de modéliser les nouveaux éléments de voiries avec construction= et autres.
Voire https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Pr%C3%A9fixe_cycle_de_vie pour les tags de cycle de vie, je pense que disused est le plus à propos.
didier2020 (2019-05-28 19:13:27+00:00): Ca ne me dérange pas que vous fassiez ces modifications.
kucai (2020-08-05 10:32:26+00:00): Are you certain of this Petrolimex (id 543253007) thing? Is it not just Petron?
angys (2020-08-05 11:46:24+00:00): Petron maybe
HDunn (2019-05-26 16:31:37+00:00): Why did you change it to construction? while the village suffered fire damage, it should be you can mark the damaged building themselves as ruined. The village outline must stay residential. Please fix.
Viajero Perdido (2019-05-30 14:19:48+00:00): This is getting repetitive.

Hi atomwaffen.

Please do NOT delete forest polygons simply because they don't meet your standards for accuracy, unless you're willing to supply a better replacement.

I've rebuilt the polygon you deleted.  Please don't delete anything further.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-21 01:36:10+00:00): observed while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
icycle77 (2019-05-25 13:27:08+00:00): On second look, I believe I joined through a bridge when I should not have.
user_5359 (2019-05-25 14:47:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you need help? Should I revert your change?
icycle77 (2019-05-25 15:01:01+00:00): Yes please revert and I will resubmit without the bridge on Browning Pond Rd kept as a separate segment, assuming that is correct. Thanks
user_5359 (2019-05-25 15:06:16+00:00): Done! You are welcome!
Kartenziegel (2019-05-25 13:07:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224657079 gehört doch aufgesplittet, oder?
kjon (2019-05-25 13:44:03+00:00): würde ich auch vermuten...
Zabir91 (2019-05-25 16:57:18+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-25 13:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70611498 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-25 13:37:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70611241.
utack (2019-06-08 20:13:12+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.  
Zurn Information: Der Zaun allein kann verschieden interpretiert werden, um alle Zweifel aus dem Weg zu räumen sollten evtl noch access tags dazu die festlegen ob der weg damit abgesperrt ist und wenn ja für wen  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
utack (2019-06-08 20:13:46+00:00): Vermutlich ist es hier access=no , da der weg komplett vom zaun versperrt wird?
Jose Luis Infante (2019-05-25 23:13:45+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tu contribución. Próximamente se iniciará el proceso de importación de datos del Catastro en Badalona, por lo que te animo a colaborar en el proyecto.
Un saludo!
skquinn (2019-05-26 20:41:01+00:00): These should have been in separate changesets. The bounding box for this changeset stretches over greater Houston, TX, and several other states besides Oklahoma and Florida, making it more difficult to see local edits.
bolli24 (2019-05-26 22:14:22+00:00): That must have happened accidental. I should have paid more attention to upload before going to the next atsk.
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-26 22:40:11+00:00): That's not a huge issue.  I do have a suggestion, though: use iD for tasks like this one.  iD recently was updated to include a new type of validation that can automatically convert POIs tagged with names of chain stores into those chain stores.  It adds the correct tags, such as amenity=fast_food, and also wikidata and cuisine tags as appropriate.
Thanks for contributing!
bolli24 (2019-05-26 23:43:33+00:00): Thanks for the tip. I wasn't aware of that functionality of iD.
abakus_uploader (2019-05-25 22:31:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Kovoschiz (2020-12-24 10:46:49+00:00): Please don't connect areas to roads
RicoElectrico (2020-01-01 21:38:46+00:00): Cześć, popatrz proszę na uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2042609 - czy tu jest fizyczne rozdzielenie jezdni? Na zdjęciach lotniczych wygląda jakby nie było.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-24 10:45:14+00:00): Please don't connect areas to roads
Sanniu (2019-06-16 10:53:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692422772 - is it in construction or proposed? Tagging is inconsistent...
Flayer (2019-06-16 10:56:55+00:00): In construction. I've fixed the tagging right now.
Sanniu (2019-06-16 10:57:27+00:00): Thanks!
gurglypipe (2019-05-26 20:22:12+00:00): Thanks for your edits. In the iD editor, you can press ‘Q’ to automatically square the corners of an area, which makes it easy to square the corners of buildings.

(Note: The keyboard shortcut used to be ‘S’ — it changed recently.)