piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ika-chan! UK-USA (2019-03-06 16:17:57+00:00): The reconstruction of the boundaries covers the route clockwise from Hillingdon/Hounslow to Barnet/Harrow.
Basstoelpel (2020-05-22 07:22:04+00:00): Dear DressyPear4,

Before you tag every node of a power line as power=tower, check that there is in fact a tower at that position. In any other case, it is both a mechanical edit and messing up the data.

Greetings,

Baßtölpel
iriman (2019-03-08 13:33:01+00:00): سلام، تگ 
natural=glacier
برای توده‌های یخی «دائمی» استفاده میشه. در صفحه ویکی ذکر شده که برای رسم دقیق این محل‌ها از روی تصاویر هوایی، به تصاویر هوایی مربوط به تابستان مراجعه کنید که توده به حداقل مقدارش رسیده باشه. لطفا صفحه ویکی رو مطالعه بفرمایید.
eggie (2019-03-06 17:03:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-06 17:04:44+00:00): Je vraagt om een review. Wanneer de weg inderdaad niet doorloopt is dit een goede actie
Gr. Eggie
viloan (2019-03-06 16:27:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
wille (2019-03-07 21:41:14+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição. Escolas técnicas devem ser mapeadas como college mesmo. Confira no wiki.osm.org
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67850990
eggie (2019-03-06 17:06:48+00:00): Dag Finlay.. Bicycle=dismount graag verwijderen. Dat is meer voor trappen met een gootje of wanneer er een bord staat met fietsers afstappen. motor_vehicle=no hoeft ook niet op een footway. ...dat is default. 
Gr eggie
FinlayDaG33k (2019-03-06 17:53:14+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Ik heb het aangepast in #67853381.

Gr,
Finlay
eggie (2019-03-06 17:08:28+00:00): Wanneer hier een bord staat met "alleen bewoners" is motor_vehicle=destination oke.
MVG,
Eggie
FinlayDaG33k (2019-03-06 17:47:49+00:00): Er staat geen bord "alleen bewoners", echter wegens de manier waarop de weg loopt zou ik het wel zien als "alleen bewoners".
Autos en motoren kunnen niet verder dan de drie opritten in de weg, voetgangers en fietsers (mits afgestapt) kunnen wel verder (is ook aangegeven in 674983662, v1).
rainerU (2019-03-13 08:50:58+00:00): Y a-t-il vraiment une piste cyclable le long de l'avenue d'Argelès ? la dernière fois que je suis passé, il y avait juste des pictos vélo sur la voie de bus. J'avais ajouté cycleway:right=share_busway pour indiquer cela. 
L'attribut motor_vehicle=designated que tu as ajouté n'est probablement pas correct. Il signifierait que les véhicules à moteurs sont obligés d'emprunter la piste cyclable. 

A part cela, il est bien que quelqu'un se met à saisir les aménagements cyclables à Perpignan. Merci.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67851616
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 20:32:57+00:00): Bonjour, l'étiquetage n'est pas tout à fait correct... S'il s'agit d'un magasin vendant des vêtements cousus pour le client, alors c'est shop=tailor. Si c'est un atelier sans vente sur place alors c'est craft=tailor. D'autre part, le nom doit être avec seulement la première lettre en majuscule - ici ce serait "Maca Style" (ou "MACA Style" si "MACA" est un acronyme)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67851752
Stereo (2019-03-06 19:53:23+00:00): Hi Corban!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448670155 shouldn't there actually be two ways and a no u turn restriction there?
Corban8 (2019-03-06 21:14:14+00:00): Hi Stereo

That might be the case. At that particular junction I was just fixing a “crossing highway” error. I connected the footway near the top of that y junction to the tertiary road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=448670155#map=19/42.63487/21.08395
viloan (2019-03-06 17:10:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2019-03-07 06:20:34+00:00): Hallo Karl Kurt,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ich habe dem ganzen noch ein tourism=hotel hinzugefügt.

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67852242
abakus_uploader (2019-03-06 23:30:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MarkusHD (2019-10-31 11:51:38+00:00): Der öffentliche Bücherschrank war schon lange eingetragen. Ich hab die Dublette entfernt.
dekallo (2019-03-13 23:00:45+00:00): Hi LeifRasmussen, just FYI I noticed this import created a few buildings which don't exist. Mostly demolished in the last year or so, or otherwise temporary structures which have since been removed.
PT-53 (2019-10-20 12:18:40+00:00): Hallo NUP,
in brouter-suspets wird für diesen Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670223207
ein Hinweis angezeigt.
Der Straßenabschnitt hat keine Nutzungseinschrankungen, ist im Norden aber nur an die Straßenbahn (?) angeschlossen.
Ist das so schon korrekt?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-28 09:03:44+00:00): Hallo NUP,
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-04 08:18:24+00:00): Hallo NUP,
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
NUP (2020-04-27 18:05:57+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

das ist so richtig, wegen den Busrouten von Norden kommend.
Gruß NUP
Burisma (2019-09-18 12:08:05+00:00): Please check for overlaying buildings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328989722/history
eggie (2019-03-06 18:55:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Alleen een name=.. doet niet zoveel in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf hoort erbij. dan rendert ook de naam. shop=computer?  office=it ?
MVG,
Eggie
Computerhulp Direct (2019-03-07 10:05:30+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Kun je mij een concreet voorbeeld geven, hoe ik één en ander concreet in de hashtag verwerken moet. Ben een ict- dienstverlenend bedrijf voor de particiere thuisgebruiker en zzp'er. Zie mijn website: www.computerhulpdirect.nl.

M.vr.gr., G. Ellens
eggie (2019-03-07 10:24:01+00:00): Dag Gosse... 

De feedback staat op je laatste changeset.

Even los van OSM tags...
Kwam nog dit tegen zowel in firefox als explorer.
Via google kom je wel in de website. 
www.computerhulpdirect.nl. gebruikt een ongeldig beveiligingscertificaat.

Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-07 10:26:51+00:00): .. zeker de hik in mijn computer, want nu gaat de website wel.
PT-53 (2019-03-07 07:10:56+00:00): Hallo TZ2,
Willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast an allen Gebäuden am "Mittelbiberacher Schloß" das Attribut historic=castle ergänzt. Jetzt gibt es in OSM in Mittelbiberach 7 historische Schlösser. In Wirklichkeit ist es natürlich nur ein Schloß.
Wie Du im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dcastle) nachlesen kannst, sollte für die gesamte Schloßanlage nur ein einziger Eintrag erfolgen. Entweder als zentraler Punkt innerhalb der Schoßanlage oder man erstellt einen Umriß der gesamten Schöußanlage und markiert diese entsprechend.
Überarbeitest Du das nochmal oder soll ich das für Dich machen?
Fragende Grüße aus dem Landkreis BC
ThomasZell (2019-03-07 07:40:00+00:00): Ah, sorry. Das sind natürlich 6 Schlösser zuviel :-)
Ich ändere das umgehend. Ein Gebäude das alles umfasst scheint mir am passendsten zu sein.
PT-53 (2019-03-07 11:14:08+00:00): Hallo TZ2,
Du hast nun in diesem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67871667 sämtliche Schloß-Gebäude gelöscht und statt dessen für den ganzen Gebäudekomplex ein einziges Gebäude neu eingezeichnet.
Sorry, aber so geht das nicht. Das sind gem. der amtlichen Karte Maps4BW, von der ich die Gebäude korrekt übernommen hatte, mehrere Gebäude und nicht ein einziges!
Ich habe daher Deine Änderungen vollständig zurückgesetzt und als Info im Zentrum des Schloßhofen einen POI-Node mit historic=castle + name=Mittelbiberacher Schloß erstellt.
ThomasZell (2019-03-07 14:17:56+00:00): Ok, alles klar!
eggie (2019-03-06 19:01:05+00:00): Hi.. It's better to tag at the addressnode. In that case there is a link between Hotel and address. 
Gr eggie
EeEeRrRr (2019-03-06 20:34:16+00:00): Hi Eddie,
I uploaded it through OSMAND but I now added the address. Can you confirm this?
Kind regards,
Erik
eggie (2019-03-06 21:04:17+00:00): Hi Erik,

It's okay this way!  All addressnodes are import from the Dutch Kadaster. 
You may add also phone= and website=

Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-06 18:59:47+00:00): Hi..You asked for a review

Normaly we tag at the addressnode and not at the buildingshape

If the name of the building is Paard than it's okay.
Gr Eggie
Dimacn (2019-03-07 19:37:37+00:00): Зачем вы убрали возможность проезда со Строителей к детской поликлинике? Я сам там недавно проезжал в поликлинику там есть проезд!
Владимир К (2019-03-09 08:51:03+00:00): проезды были неаккуратные, я поправил как увидел по снимку. посмотрел еще раз, дорисовал. Проверьте.
Dimacn (2019-03-09 15:55:38+00:00): Да, всё нормально, спасибо.
viloan (2019-03-06 18:53:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dvdhoven (2019-03-09 06:55:12+00:00): changeset reverted. Don't use cycleway=opposite in the Netherlands, but use oneway:xxx=no! In the Netherlands we also have combinations like this: cycleway=lane;oneway=no;oneway:bicycle=no;oneway:mofa=no
You see no place for the idiotic tag cycleway=opposite
user_242798 (2019-03-10 20:30:08+00:00): Idiotic tag?
If “the Netherlands” decides [cycleway=opposite] is an idiotic tag then please update OSM-wiki to ensure its correctness in reflecting Dutch exceptions to OSM global best practice.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite
“Use cycleway=opposite for situations where cyclists are permitted to travel in both directions on a road which is one-way for normal traffic, in situations where there is no dedicated contra-flow lane marked for cyclists. It may accompany oneway:bicycle=no to explicitly mark that road is not oneway to cyclists but there is no separate contraflow lane. Note that for routing purposes using just oneway:bicycle=no is enough, this tag may be used to explicitly describe cycling infrastructure and some may prefer to not spend time on adding it. For example without this tag it is not clear that somebody surveyed location and confirmed that there is no separate contraflow lane.”
I myself use [cycleway=opposite] if my bicycle track is in opposite direction, but I don't know or don’t remember if [oneway:moped=no] is justified. 
Sometimes I update this tag later by adding [oneway:*=no], using Mapillary for Source. But for global compliancy I leave [cycleway=opposite] as is.
Non-Dutch Renderers might be assuming global wiki-documentation is also leading in the Netherlands. Therefore only rendering [cycleway=opposite]. Like JOSM does.
JOSM only renders [cycleway=opposite]! 
So if [cycleway=opposite] is indeed an idiotic tag than please request JOSM to render [oneway:*=no]. So I can see where [oneway:bicycle=no] is missing on [oneway=yes] highways.
Difference in opinion is oké. Changesets Comments are meant for these debates. But Reverting is not a very polite way to handle dispute. Unless you would argue this is an “undiscussed mechanical edit”.
Did you verify what work by user  KartoGrapHiti is lost by this revert?
Finally: There are several Changesets by AnkEric also to be reverted because of the use of [cycleway=opposite] and [oneway:bicycle=no] and sometimes [oneway:moped=no]. Just a hint...
wille (2019-03-07 21:39:50+00:00): Olá, tudo bem?
Nessa edição vocẽ apagou a vila 12 de outubro. Este dado havia sido importado do IBGE. Você tem certeza que o local não existe? Uma dica para melhorar em suas edições é sempre procurar aproveitar o que já esta mapeado e modificar, em vez de apagar e criar outro no mesmo local.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67856377
Ls92 (2019-03-08 09:15:25+00:00): Verdade, cometi um erro
Estava redimensionando o local só que no Google Chorume (desculpe a expressão)  a opção do botão direito do mouse não aparece para desconectar os pontos, acabei deletando e no Mozila tentei restaurar só que fiz algo aqui que não voltou a tela.   A Vila 12 de Outubro era uma rua ou uma area residencial mesmo?
Ls92 (2019-03-08 09:42:02+00:00): Esses dados do IBGE são de quais datas?
Me parece bastante atual e alinhadas
Eu na verdade comecei a mapear no começo deste mês
kooky_toky (2019-03-22 01:02:48+00:00): Hi Diogenes, are the dirt roads parallel to Avenida Commandante Fidel Castro accessible to the public? If so, I think they are frontage roads and should be unclassified rather than service: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-22 10:43:18+00:00): Hi kooky-toky, I should have reply back to your message as soon as I received it, however, I was so swept up in what I was doing at the time that the task completely escaped my mind

Based on the definition of a 'Frontage Road' in OpenStreetMap's wiki, that is exactly what they are

Although, there are clear sections in the highway that where purposefully established to allow vehicles access to these 'frontage roads', they themselves are, in most cases, established informally (which is why they have not properly been constructed to the expected standards of road regulations)

https://i.imgur.com/Xpd2WRT.jpg [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.97273/13.27098&layers=NG ]

https://i.imgur.com/SVJsV3Z.jpg [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.97324/13.26367&layers=NG ]

I would like to have presented better images that show the gaps between the curb and sidewalk, however, I have since deleted all other footage of 'Avenida Commandante Fidel Castro'
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-22 10:45:44+00:00): would you like to do the honours or should I?
kooky_toky (2019-03-23 00:18:04+00:00): I have changed the frontage roads and informal access roads to unclassified or residential. I left the parking lots and areas that seemed to be private as service. Feel free to make adjustments. Thanks for responding so quickly!
Viajero Perdido (2019-03-25 14:18:31+00:00): Hi AG.  Lois Hole Park is largely or entirely wild land, eg marshes, lake, trees.  I wouldn't classify it as recreation_ground, which suggests park-like areas meant for human activity.  Cheers.
Pokomams (2021-10-09 11:09:15+00:00): Le tag building=yes ne devait pas être supprimé je pense. Je vais corriger.
A+
jaap de vries (2019-03-08 15:19:16+00:00): Je verwijderd zomaar een speeltuin waar Ruben een opmerking over heeft gemaakt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1691738.
Ik heb zelf n.a.v. een veldbezoek de juiste contouren van de speeltuin toegevoegd.
@win88 (2019-03-08 18:09:27+00:00): Nee hoor ik had gewoon een speeltuin geplaatst, deze is door jou verwijderd. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67858202
jaap de vries (2019-03-08 19:26:53+00:00): Het vlak wat eerder stond heb jij verwijderd en daarna een punt met speeltuin neergezet. Van Ruben heb ik bericht gehad, die is niet blij hoe jij dit oppakt. Ik ben zelf eventjes wezen kijken, omrijden via Hoevelaken. De juiste contouren heb ik inmiddels toegevoegd.
Ik vindt het zeer onprofessioneel hoe jij met opmerkingen omgaat, lijkt wel op vandalisme. Via de opmerking heb ik dit je al eerder bekend gemaakt.
@win88 (2019-03-08 20:41:30+00:00): Om dit nu vandalisme te noemen gaat wel heel ver, ik heb in die edit diverse punten verbeterd, en er was nog altijd een speeltuin op de map aanwezig. Dus van vandalisme is hier zeker geen sprake.
Als Ruben hier vragen of problemen mee heeft/had dan kan hij ook contact opnemen met mij ipv via via, ik bijt niet.
jaap de vries (2019-03-08 20:43:34+00:00): Bedankt voor je reactie, ik zal het doorgeven aan Ruben, mocht hij vragen aan je hebben kan die dat aan je stellen als hij dat wil. Was nogal boos op je.
Leo Slager (2019-03-09 00:11:23+00:00): Please do not use the tag cycleway=opposite in the Netherlands.
The reason is simple. Nearly Always there is no cycleway. In both directions bicycles drive on the normal road.
In that case tags used in The Netherlands are oneway:bicycle=no, oneway:mofa-no and oneway:moped=no.
Please do not make this kind of changes in the Netherlands if you do not know what the roules are.
KartoGrapHiti (2019-03-10 21:07:40+00:00): Thank you for your information. I am a little bit surprised, that "The Netherlands" have special rules, whitch are not documented in the OSM-Wiki. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
At the Moment, the Wiki says: ".cycleway=opposite/opposite_lane/opposite_track may be additionally added to clarify bicycle infrastructure and to increase compatibility" 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
"Use cycleway=opposite for situations where cyclists are permitted to travel in both directions on a road which is one-way for normal traffic, in situations where there is no dedicated contra-flow lane marked for cyclists. In practice there is typically a very short section of road, sometimes called a "cycle plug", where cycles are excepted from the no-entry by means of a short lane separated by an island. These roads should normally also be tagged with oneway=yes and also oneway:bicycle=no. Streets like this are common in Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark."

I am surprised, that "The Netherlands" is not interested in "compatibility". The worldwide rendering and routing must have special rules, if the netherlands has special rules.

When I look at Groningen, there are lots of streets which are only tagged by cycleway=opposite, and are not tagged by oneway:bicycle=no

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/GPH
escada (2019-03-11 13:48:00+00:00): In general, you should not do such mass "compatibility" changes without knowing the local situation.

I wonder who came up with the idea that "cycleway=opposite" is needed to make it more compatible. If everybody would just use oneway:bicycle=yes, there would be no issue at all. Furthermore, "cycleway=opposite" does not tell you the oneway situation for mofa (or moped in Belgium). 

Also the "cycle plug" is not common in Belgium at all (although the wiki page seems to suggest that). On the other hand, one way streets typically allow cyclists and moped_a's (up to 25km/h) in both directions, that is correct. moped_b (up to 45km/h) are not allowed in both directions.

The situation for speed pedelecs (in Belgium) is a bit unclear, as many signs are not adapted yet for this type of transportation.
Leo Slager (2019-03-12 11:52:11+00:00): In The Netherlands the situation is much the same. So cycleway=opposite" does not provide enough information.
Under Dutch law there is to make a diiference between bicycle, mofa and moped. The use of oneway:*=no gives the correct information. Our navigation apps can make the difference too.

Highway=cycleway is a similar case.
Under Dutch law there are three different types each with their own traffic_sign.
So we use bicycle, mofa and moped=yes/no/designated to make the difference visible.

Also the use of cycleway=opposite blocks the possibility of using cycleway=shared_lane and others.

I hope you understand why we do not like such mass changes.
marczoutendijk (2019-03-06 20:44:53+00:00): Yecla I meant.
Omnific (2019-03-06 21:24:05+00:00): Hey, thanks for the edits. One note: if you want to show a house, you don't need to name it "a house" or anything like that. Just add the house and if you can the address. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions.
marczoutendijk (2019-03-06 20:44:33+00:00): Villena I meant!
nplath (2019-03-09 11:27:23+00:00): Hi Essex_Boy,

do you know multipolygons? May you please create one for the grass area in the Avon river meadow as it is overlaying other landuses? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675036186

Best wishes
eggie (2019-03-06 20:50:14+00:00): Top!
Gr Eggie
marczoutendijk (2019-03-06 20:44:03+00:00): Not in Yecla but in Villena I meant!