piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Søren Kristensen (2022-10-02 14:18:08+00:00): Da det nu er privat ejendom er det kun personer med ærinde i baghuset der har adgang, så det vil ikke være passende at ændre det til en gangsti. For nabo bygningerne 33A og 33C er der aflåst port til baggården. Det samme er iøvrigt tilfældet for den sidevej der er aftegnet på Falstersgade 39, den eksistere ikke længere og adgang til baggården er kun for beboere med kode til porten. Begge sidegader er da også fjernet fra Aarhus Kommunes GIS kort. Det skaber en del forvirring hos bud firmaer der benytter OpenStreetMap da de fejlagtigt tror de kan tilgå baghusene 33B og 33D af vejen der er tegnet til at gå til 31B.
osmviborg (2022-10-02 14:50:49+00:00): Det er jeg helt med på. Man kan markere stier og veje som private. Man kan placere en port hvor man vil, og markere adgangsbetingelserne for denne. Det handler om korrekt tagging.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-10-02 09:05:18+00:00): Vejen på begge sider af broen må således også være blevet til cykel/gangsti. Hvis du tilpasser vejen til de faktiske forhold vil det være rigtigt fint.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-10-03 08:51:50+00:00): Ciao giovc, benvenuto su OSM!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320500398/

a me il numero di corsie di questa way sembrava corretto prima, a giudicare dalle foto aeree. Puoi controllare?

Buon proseguimento e buon mapping!
giovc (2022-10-03 14:30:24+00:00): Ho confrontato con le immagini di altre piattaforme e in quel piccolo tratto (sono 500 metri scarsi) sono 4 corsie totali. Durano dall’innesto con la A2dir NA fino al viadotto Brignano I
ivanbranco (2022-10-03 15:17:57+00:00): Sono quattro, ma quella way che ti ho linkato è fiancheggiata da questa: w330195118 che ha lanes=2

Mappando una way come lanes=4 e l'altra come lanes=2 significherebbe che nel tratto in cui si fiancheggiano ci sono 6 corsie totali.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
_zalle_ (2026-01-22 15:16:05+00:00): Gibt es für die von dir eingetragenen Eigennamen irgendwelche Quellen? Vor Ort ist jedenfalls keiner dieser Wege mit einem solchen Namen versehen.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
pio2_122 (2022-10-02 11:30:05+00:00): 1) Został błędnie zamknięty kawałek łącznicy Koszalin Zachód-Bielice (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401847825/history).
2) Nie należy stosować nazw opisowych.
3) Tagi bicycle=no, foot=no, itp. są zbędne, ponieważ implikuje je tag motorroad=yes.

Poprawiłem to.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
PT-53 (2022-10-10 06:03:56+00:00): Hallo Chris,

Für Straßen, die neu gebaut werden oder die wegen längerfristigen Baustellen (mind. 6 Monate, besser erst ab 9 Monaten) gesperrt werden, sollte die Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction
construction=* (z.B. residential, tertiary, primary …)
verwendet werden.
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Kürzere Voll-Sperrungen können mit 
access:conditional=no@(JJJJ Mmm TT-JJJJ Mmm TT) 
eingetragen werden. Dies wird auch von einigen Navis (z.B. OsmAnd) korrekt ausgewertet. 
Beispiel: 
access:conditional=no@(2020 Jan 20-2020 May 1) 
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

Eine andere Möglichkeit ware das Merkmal
temporary:access =no@(JJJJ Mmm TT-JJJJ Mmm TT) 
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional) 
Dieses Merkmal wird aber meines Wissens von (fast?) keinem Navi berücksichtigt.

Bitte passe Deine Eingaben entsprechend an!
Grüße
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
berndw (2022-10-02 09:09:24+00:00): Warum hat JOSM das Changeset ohne Nachfragen hochgeladen?
Deswegen 'kein Kommentar'. 

Der Kommentar sollte lauten:
"Wege sind als Fußwege mit VZ 239 ohne Zusatz beschildert, wegen darüber geführten Radrouten 'bicycle=dismount' zusätzlich gesetzt"
eggie (2022-10-02 10:14:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback: Elk begin is moeilijk. Dit is wel een edit in een groot gebied geworden omdat je iets hebt gedaan met een ondergrondse pijpleiding.
Het nog bestaande pad eindigt op een sloot. 
Op de meest recente luchtfoto zie ik het pad nog wel een eind doorlopen.
Het zijn eerder veldwegen highway=track volgens mij en geen voetpaden met een G7 bord zoals in een park (highway=footway) 

Om te voorkomen dat een overgroeid pad opnieuw wordt ingetekend wordt vaak highway=  vervangen door disused:highway=path  en na volledig overgroeid zij pas verwijderd.
 


Je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126885123
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Wilko van Asseldonk (2022-10-03 18:54:17+00:00): Bedankt voor je feedback. Dat van die pijpleiding was natuurlijk niet de bedoeling. Het pad is door Natuurmonumenten met prikkeldraad afgesloten en daarachter opnieuw beplant. Nog vrij recent dus waarschijnlijk nog niet te zien op satellietbeelden. 
Is er nog iets te doen aan het “verleggen” van de pijpleiding?
eggie (2022-10-03 19:11:16+00:00): Nee.. die pijpleiding had je alleen 'geraakt' en het is maar de vraag of die daar precies ligt.
Van 'hogerhand' is al vaak geprobeerd die leidingen uit de data te halen vanwege de 'veiligheid'. 
Al dat geblur op militaire objecten  en verwijderen zal weinig helpen.. Dat hebben we vorige week gezien.

Een pad dat niet meer bestaat kan gewoon weg.
Mocht het op luchtfoto's nog te zien zijn dan tag ik disused:highway=path om te voorkomen dat iemand het weer intekent.
Groet
eggie
Rainero (2022-10-02 09:15:33+00:00): Korrektur: source= Maxar Premium
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
bxl-forever (2022-10-02 10:52:13+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding more info to the map.

May I bring two pieces of advice here:

1) It’s better to upload changes in Antwerp and Brussels in separate changesets.  If you do all at once, it creates this large box, which will annoy every mapper reviewing any part of the map between those two places.

2) Even though I’m not a specialist in brands, I think "Max & Moi" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2665166658) is a French brand and is unrelated to Indian "Max Fashion" brand, their corporate identity look very different.  Same for Helly Hansen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2665165952), which is a Norwegian brand and is unrelated to "7 for All Mankind".  The iD editor sometimes suggests "upgrading" the tags of a POI, but there is a lot of crap in those suggestions, it’s better to ignore most of them.

Hope his helps.
ThVerhulst (2022-10-02 10:57:36+00:00): Hi, thanks. It was indeed more an experiment. I should have had a harder look.
Supaplex (2022-10-04 16:35:17+00:00): 嗨

你好像不小心動到道路名稱，將英文名稱寫進中文的欄位了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126885363
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Cy R (2022-10-02 16:53:07+00:00): Hello! This changeset reverts the updated alignment of reconstructed curb ramps and crossings along N 80th St. This is one of the streets that I sent in the list that you asked for.

Please check the version history of an element before adjusting it with outdated imagery.

Thanks!
UW Maddie (2022-10-03 03:22:39+00:00): I wasn'y using outdated imagery for this, I saw your message about the construction, this is referencing the streetside imagery which is new enough to include the newly constructed curbs, some of which were actually missing
UW Maddie (2022-10-03 03:28:46+00:00): And I know they're all new because they have tactile pads absent from the aerial imagery and match mapillary feeds from 2021 and 2022
Cy R (2022-10-03 04:03:40+00:00): Hi 0wu, thanks for the reply. I'm referring to the angles of the curb ramps which changed after the construction. For example, this changeset moves some ramps back to the ~45 degree angle shown in the older Bing aerial imagery. However, the construction replaced a few of these with straight angles, and added a second ramp at 90 degrees on some corners.

The missing crossings I left out intentionally because N 80th St can be quite busy during the day (despite its tertiary status in OSM). I'm reluctant to draw unmarked crossings across dangerous roads until pedestrian routers mature. I'd rather emphasize the the safer marked/signalized crossings that exist nearby. Is this a problem for OpenSidewalks?
Cy R (2022-10-03 04:21:32+00:00): Oh... 

Dr. Caspi introduced me to the OpenSidewalks Tasking manager today. I just noticed that the iD instance in this tool doesn't have the newer King County aerial imagery option. You may wish to cross-reference changes made through the tasking manager with KC 2021 imagery available in the official iD editor instance at openstreetmap.org or in JOSM. Use this offset to line it up with existing sidewalk data: -1.73, 0.77

It may be a simple upgrade to get this imagery into the tasking manager for your team. Hope this helps!
UW Maddie (2022-10-03 04:36:07+00:00): That sounds good, but how do I access this imagery within the editor? Also I was using the 2021 streetside imagery for 80th, not the aerial imagery, for example the southwest corner of Densmore and 80th had an extra wide single curb added rather than 2, so now I have this question: should that type of extra wide curb encompassing both crossing angles be marked as a single curb or 2 separate ones, like is there a routing implication for blind pedestrians that would make separating a wide tactile pad preferable?
Cy R (2022-10-03 07:19:31+00:00): To access the imagery in the editor on openstreetmap.org, open the "Background Settings" panel on the right, and choose the "King County Orthoimagery (2021)" option. The imagery offset settings are at the bottom of the panel.

And good question about those newer "elbow macaroni" curbs... I've thought about this type of curb a lot. I used to draw those with a single curb node, but it often didn't feel right. 

For the wider ones, I add two curb nodes now because I try to capture the natural path that a human would actually follow in the real world, and I want create more contrast between those straighter paths versus other crossings in which a person might have to follow the sharper angles of the small corner ramps that point into the center of an intersection.

This may result in better comprehension of directions for the blind. The sharp angle when using one node could provoke an unnecessary detour into the waiting area of the crossing and may cause a person reading a tactile map to spend extra time searching for things like beg buttons or guide ridges in the center of the curb edge when those assistive features are placed at the ends.

Using two nodes is also more friendly for typical map readers because we can reduce the zig-zag of the crossing center line that just adds noise to the visual representations for sighted people who often walk right over the curbs in a straight line.

I still haven't decided whether to classify these as "kerb=lowered" or "kerb=flush". Arguments could be made for each...
Cy R (2022-10-03 07:23:34+00:00): To improve the representation of those wide curbs when using two nodes, we could connect both nodes with a way tagged with:

barrier=kerb
kerb=*
tactile_paving=yes

This way they're connected by a single feature for anyone who happens to want that data.
Cy R (2022-10-03 07:25:33+00:00): Ah, I figured out how to get the KC 2021 imagery into the tasking manager:

1. Open the background settings panel
2. Choose the "Custom" option
3. Paste this URL: https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/arcgis/rest/services/BaseMaps/KingCo_Aerial_2021/MapServer/WMTS/tile/1.0.0/BaseMaps_KingCo_Aerial_2021/default/default028mm/{z}/{y}/{x}

Hope that helps!
UW Maddie (2022-10-03 07:40:53+00:00): I got it to work. And yes I like this idea of mapping the wide curbs as 2 rather than 1 for this purpose so I'll start doing that, but I'm not sure if the extra way is necessary
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.