piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-09-11 09:49:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Tall buildings are wrongly mapped. See the paragraph about it in the  document below. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125472879
Scottie0001 (2022-08-28 11:18:16+00:00): Realignments around Sunshine Coast Airport, not Sippy Downs.
eggie (2022-08-28 14:17:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
bxl-forever (2022-08-28 16:22:55+00:00): Thanks, but "bas relief" only exists in French, I think you need to put this tag instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Drelief
PierZen (2022-09-18 19:57:38+00:00): L'Imagerie ne permet pas encore de confirmer la connexion de la station Romaine-4 avec la ligne Montagnais. Quelle source vous permet de déduire ce schéma de connexion ?
Gazer75 (2022-09-18 22:08:09+00:00): Ezri imagery shows it nearly complete. Hydro Quebec states construction was completed in 2019 and Romaine 4 is scheduled to begin production in 2022.
Ydel (2023-04-18 12:27:38+00:00): Hello,
I see that you removed tag level=0 and added power=0. Is it a mistake?
Cheers,
Yann
user_5359 (2023-04-18 13:17:18+00:00): Definitely! Already corrected. I have no idea how that happened. Thank you for the hint.
Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
Ydel (2023-04-18 14:46:25+00:00): Thanks!
Yann
map per (2022-10-15 07:25:09+00:00): Hallo Maverick12,

das Gebäude in dem du Tesla-Car-Rent (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983237828) eingezeichnet hast ist grad eine große Baustelle. Ist die Autovermietung wirklich dort?

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-10-22 15:00:13+00:00): Hab den POI auf not:amenity=car_rental gesetzt
os-emmer (2023-12-21 19:58:27+00:00): Hallo Maverick12,
du hast hier eine addr:country=AT in München eingetragen. War das absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983237826
os-emmer (2023-12-22 00:23:30+00:00): Analog dazu die gleiche Frage habe ich zu diesen Objekten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9754123525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9754541138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/659289220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7931106165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9754541168
eggie (2022-08-28 12:13:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jcr83 (2022-08-28 20:28:29+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove way 796423766 ? Was it destroyed?
GinaroZ (2022-08-29 21:51:53+00:00): What kind of shop is this? As the name has been changed but not the shop= tag.
eggie (2022-08-28 14:46:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-29 09:40:20+00:00): 注意到你肇事逃逸删号了，导致对破坏的识别和侦察非常困难

但，在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125513607 中已复原原有的数据。

耗子尾汁
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125476168
user_5359 (2022-08-29 11:03:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/287798820. What is the correct name of the street?
name = Avenida Doze de Setembro
NAME = Rua Doze de Setembro
Raphaelkaart (2022-08-29 19:16:37+00:00): Hi!

Corrected the Tags that mapped wrong!

thanks for letting me know!

Raphaelkaart
Langlaeufer (2022-08-28 18:54:35+00:00): Hallo Paul,
die Änderung des Radweges in nicht benutzungspflichtig verwundert mich. Im April hing höhe Süntelstr. noch ein blaues Zeichen.
Bezieht sich die Änderung evtl nur auf den nördlichen Teil?  Wenn der Weg baulich einen Radweg aufweist, dann würde ich es auch bei path belassen und nur bicycle auf yes setzten.
Grüße
Frank aka Langlaeufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125476577
Langlaeufer (2022-08-28 19:02:15+00:00): Weg geteilt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125476577
Paul 42 (2022-08-29 14:42:48+00:00): Hallo Frank,
baulich gibt es auf der gesamten Strecke einen Radweg und bei der Sutelstraße hängt so ein blaues Schild mit getrenntem Rad und Fußweg. Ich bin noch ganz neu hier und war vom Namen Pfad und dem Bild, welches angezeigt wurde, etwas irritiert. Jetzt weiß ich Bescheid das man es bei Pfad belässt. Ich habe im Wiki nachgeschaut und dort steht das man bei diesem Schild bicycle=designated setzt. Ich bin mir jetzt aber nicht sicher was der Unterschied zwischen yes und designated ist. 
Danke für das Feedback.
Grüße Paul
Langlaeufer (2022-08-29 14:57:01+00:00): Hallo Paul,

bicycle=designated in Deutschland wenn ein blaues Radwegschild steht und der Radweg somit benutzungspflichtig.
bicycle=yes wenn der Radweg nicht oder nur weiß beschildert dann nicht benutzungspflichtig.
path immer dann wenn es ein gemeinsamer Rad und Fußweg ist.

Ich habe den Weg mittlerweile getrennt den südlichen Teil benutzungspflichtig, den nördlichen nicht benutzungspflichtig (weil kein Schild an Kreuzung Kugelfangtrift)

Grüße Frank
FreedSky (2022-08-29 08:01:41+00:00): 你的编辑破坏了 南岗区 和 道里区。现已退回。https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125509156
eggie (2022-08-28 15:01:43+00:00): Hi Manfred.. Is this an official camperplace.. Anyway there is no caravan_site here.
Please don't add unofficial campersites.
Please reply
eggie
eggie (2022-08-28 15:07:54+00:00): Please.. Have a look here

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site

And only a German name? 
name=??? 

Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 14:53:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
ChristianA (2023-05-02 11:57:39+00:00): Hi there. Should the footway along the water really be tagged as a "highway=pedestrian" and not "highway=footway"?
Peter L (2023-05-02 14:42:59+00:00): Probably. The tag itself was created by StreetComplete and I haven't checked the validity further.
radiotrefoil (2022-09-03 14:21:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. I think natural=shrubbery fits these features? garden:style=shrubbery has few previous uses. Thoughts?
Cheers - 2hu4u
andrewsh (2022-10-10 22:26:00+00:00): According to the information I could find, Crieff Junction was the station on the mainline which is now called Gleneagles, but I can’t find any mention of what you added in Crieff itself.
Mauls (2022-10-11 10:40:55+00:00): Crief Junction was also the name of the junction in Crief.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-29 09:57:02+00:00): Looks good, thanks!
Diacritic (2022-08-29 08:58:16+00:00): Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471
Diacritic (2022-08-29 08:58:58+00:00): Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471
Diacritic (2022-08-29 08:59:04+00:00): Hey Map Analyser,

Where did you find the Link name from for this onramp? I can't find it in any official source :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125478471
Allison P (2022-08-29 03:42:08+00:00): Before uploading, please square buildings by selecting them and pressing Q.
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
dieterdreist (2022-11-21 14:18:33+00:00): Hi Baron,

I have noticed that you removed a note:it tag from way 294972628 but I found that the data from SAT is still not in accordance with the OSM way, and you do not explain it in your changeset comment. Have you been there, and are there guideposts/markers for the 245A route along this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294972628

Thank you,
Cheers,
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-11-21 16:39:42+00:00): Hi Baron, it is me again, I somehow missed the end of your fixme, not it is clear and I will modify the relation accordingly, thank you.
Carnildo (2022-08-29 08:23:39+00:00): Being on private property is not a reason to delete people's driveways, or Avista service roads, or other things that exist.  They're useful for people like firefighters, delivery drivers, or simply visitors trying to get to someone's home.  As such, I've restored them.

I have marked a number of them as "private" when they weren't already marked as such.
owner of this property (2022-08-29 14:19:33+00:00): There are two things here - a trail on which people routinely trespass and my driveway (leaving from corner of Connaught and Berridae). *Neither are Avista service roads*.  They are both privately owned, there is no public access.  
RE: my driveway, I do not want it on your map, and I don't care about your reasons.  Take it off. 
Furthermore, you have listed access as public, when it is not.  Are you going to take responsiblity for what happens to people trespassing on my land when you have erroneously labeled it public?
Allison P (2022-08-29 14:48:48+00:00): Tough luck. There are no laws against mapping others' property where OSM is based. There is a law against computer vandalism, though. And there are plenty of users who are happy to restore the data as often as is needed.

The other thing is that we're not responsible for misuse of maps using OSM data. Legally or logically. We can certainly take more steps to lower the chances of misuse (and are happy to, so long as this doesn't involve incorrect mapping), but the appropriate response is to put up physical warnings.

We map military installations in countries where doing so is banned. Map making without permission of the Chinese government is also banned, but we do it anyway. Simply put, there's nothing you can do.

I don't say this to be a jerk. People use my driveway all the time, leaving tire marks. I just know the map isn't at fault. People think they can use it as a turnaround or in one case avoid a road closure. They've done it since before OpenStreetMap had my driveway. If I really needed to take action, I'd put "no trespassing" signs up.
Carnildo (2022-08-29 18:25:29+00:00): There were six things you deleted:

* A driveway leading to a water tower that was mostly on city-owned land.

* Two driveways leading to houses, crossing land owned by three different people.

* A service road running under Bonneville Power Administration lines.  You're correct that it's not owned by Avista -- rather, it's on easements across property owned by 14 different individuals.

* The road you describe as your driveway.

* Something that appears to be a mix of driveway, farm track, and abandoned logging road, which is in need of cleaning up.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-09-01 06:39:25+00:00): Fixed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125480055
Allison P (2022-08-29 03:38:30+00:00): Check spelling of "Parker Cemetary"
ivanbranco (2022-08-28 18:21:59+00:00): Ciao Pasquale,

qualche appunto al changeset. 
Gli edifici si mappano seguendo le loro "fondamenta", non la forma dell'edificio.

Quando si mappa una chiesa va aggiunto anche il tag building=church

Inoltre puoi scrivere delle descrizioni ai changeset che aiutino gli altri utenti a capire cosa hai modificato? "Update" non è esaustivo, in quanto ogni changeset di OSM è un update. Qua puoi leggere delle linee guida per capire come commentare in modo utile per gli altri mapper: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Buon mapping
ivanbranco (2022-08-28 18:22:41+00:00): Correggo una svista: 

Gli edifici si mappano seguendo le loro "fondamenta", non la forma **del tetto**.
eggie (2022-08-28 14:56:39+00:00): Dag Edwin  Hoeveel Fitness instellingen zitten hier?
Er staan er nu twee.
Studio Fysiq en Studio Fysiq Yoga Pilates
De format voor een adres is zonder spatie overigens.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-28 14:59:31+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd tot één adesnode.
Maps.me is niet de ideale editor om overzicht te houden.
Groet
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-05 16:05:06+00:00): Are you sure about that indoor=no ? For charger that sounds like incident waiting to happen

Is it at least covered=yes? Maybe it is covered by station roof/shelter enough to count as indoor?
legofahrrad (2025-09-05 16:47:24+00:00): Hi Mateusz, this bench is neither indoor nor covered. The USB sockets are at the sides (and not at the top) of the bench to be used in any weather conditions.
You can take a look at street imagery or this photo from a local newspaper:
https://img.weser-kurier.de/image/0278-15fbf189328a-5bfc75885ef4-1000/960,16-9,med,50,50,1_3543_2362_3543_1992_1_-0_0_1_0_-185/Landscapepower-bank-bsag-haltestelle-am-brill.webp
Greetings from Bremen, Germany!
LuxuryCoop (2022-09-02 23:59:41+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
messpert (2022-10-05 18:09:44+00:00): You seem to have added a higway tag to a node. Why?
ratrun (2022-10-06 14:56:50+00:00): Looks that I merged node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9738428710/history where this was already present.
I just deleted those two tags now.
Niiepce (2022-09-02 09:49:37+00:00): Hallo,
Sie verwenden häufig den Tag place=square für alle Art von Flächen wie Haltebuchten an Schnellstraßen, Rettungsplätze oder verschiedene Lagerplätze.
Die Definition zum Tag lautet: "Das tag place=square bezeichnet einen Platz im Sinne einer nicht bebauten, öffentlichen Fläche in urbanen Zentren, wie Städten, Gemeinden und Dörfern. Plätze werden typischerweise von Straßen gekreuzt, können aber auch Fußgängerzonen, Grünflächen oder Flächen mit befestigter Oberfläche sein."
Ich finde, dass einige Verwendungen des Tags ihrerseits nicht der Definition entsprechen. Sehen sie dies anders oder kann ich das korrigieren?
Zudem ist "Platz für Rettungsfahrzeuge" kein Eigenname.
user_9648254 (2022-09-07 15:15:50+00:00): Sorry, was sie finden, ist mir egal. Der Name ist in meinen Augen bedeutend und somit berechtigt, da es sich um wichtige Plaetze handelt.
Und Erstellen neuer Tags sind laut Statuten erlaubt.
woodpeck (2022-09-19 11:23:31+00:00): Hallo Sanderauer, ich bin Mitglied der Data Working Group von OSM und wir greifen ein, wenn sich Benutzer gegenseitig (sinnbildlich) an die Gurgel gehen. Das ist offensichtlich mit Dir und Niiepce der Fall. Ich kann verstehen, wenn Du Dir von Niiepce "gestalkt" vorkommst, aber der einzige Grund, warum er das macht, ist, dass Du eben (noch) sehr häufig Fehler machst und die Qualität der Karte dadurch verschlechterst. Da darfst Du es anderen Mappern nicht übel nehmen, wenn sie genauer hinschauen. Das ist ganz normal - da hättest Du nicht neulich eine "Falle" stellen müssen. 

In diesem Changeset zum Beispiel hast Du einen Abstellort für Rettungsfahrzeuge fälschlicherweise mit place=square versehen UND ihm fälschlicherweise einen deskriptiven Namen gegeben. Niiepce hätte jedes Recht gehabt, diese Fehler direkt zu korrigieren - stattdessen hat er Dich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, in der Hoffnung, dass Du daraus lernen kannst. Letzten Endes wollen wir ja alle das gleiche - eine gute Karte machen! Wir haben nichts davon, Dich zu vergraulen, Du hast ja gute Informationen beizutragen, aber Du musst lernen, es so zu machen, dass es nützt und nicht stört. 

Bitte korrigiere den "Platz für Rettungsfahrzeuge" hier. Auch in anderen Fällen haben Dir andere Mapper wertvolle Hinweise gegeben, die Du ignoriert hast. Insbesondere die "deskriptiven Namen" scheinen immer ein Problem zu sein. Auch der "offengelassene Steinbruch" und "ehemalige Sprengstoffbunker" östlich von hier sind Deine Werke und stellen eine falsche Verwendung des name-Tags dar. Bitte entferne diese Namen bzw. verschiebe sie in "note" oder "description". Ein ehemaliger Bunker könnte eventuell auch historic=ruins sein, das häng davon ab, wie intakt er noch ist. 

Lieber Niiepce, bitte pausiere Deine "Überwachung" und Kommentierung der Sanderauer-Edits für eine Weile. Ich werde das jetzt selbst übernehmen und Sanderauer um Korrekturen bitten, wo es nötig ist.

Lieber Sanderauer, bitte sieh Dir doch einmal die vergangenen Kommentare zu Deinen Edits auf https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9648254 an und überlege, ob einige davon vielleicht - so lästig sie sein mögen - doch eine Beachtung wert sind. Es geht uns ja nicht darum, Dich bloßzustellen, wenn wir auf Fehler hinweisen, sondern wir wollen, dass Du mit Deinem Wissen auf eine Art und Weise zu OSM beitragen kann, die OSM besser macht und nicht auf eine Art, die uns zwingt, Deine Beiträge später wieder zu löschen oder ihnen hinterher zu arbeiten, weil sie nicht unseren Standards entsprechen.
kartler175 (2022-12-30 10:12:43+00:00): Abgesehen davon dass "only_u_turn" nicht definiert ist, was soll der Sienn dieser Abbiegebeschränkung sein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14512527 ?
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 15:44:49+00:00): Ste anne rc already has a church cemetery(Church Cemeteries are better tagged as grave_yard despite this tag is getting rarer)
Ste.Anne Cemetery is seperate?
Allison P (2022-08-28 15:27:57+00:00): I discovered one error while still in JOSM and corrected it there. I found four more errors in my cleanup, done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125482353. This means the error rate is similar to my previous edit like this. To mitigate it, I may need to manually review the area before even downloading it in JOSM. The problematic areas are streets that meander so significantly that their predirectional is "wrong", and short cul-de-sacs that don't have their own name or predirectional. When bulk moving the address nodes, these are moved in the direction of the wrong house. To avoid this, I will manually conflate buildings on these cul-de-sacs and on sections of streets that run contrary to their predirectionals. This should add minimal time to the process while hopefully avoiding all errors.
kepivar (2022-09-04 18:07:49+00:00): Hi John,

please don't just do the autovalidate ;) Hedges like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360787810/history have more useless tags, or not?
Johnwhelan (2022-09-04 18:22:57+00:00): From memory that particular way was untagged.  On inspection I think I copied the tags from a nearby way.

The JOSM validation clean up is short hand for loading it into JOSM then individually inspecting each problem.  I seem to recall deleting about a thousand duplicate buildings in Burkina Faso. So yes I'm cleaning up from imagery rather than being boots on the ground and inspecting each leaf to see which species it is but on the whole I think the map is cleaner afterwards.  If you have a concern that the hedge has been incorrectly tagged then I suggest you revert the change set so it becomes untagged once more.   John
Johnwhelan (2022-09-04 19:33:46+00:00): Out of curiosity which userid do you map under?
jmarchon (2022-08-28 17:59:52+00:00): Hi,
What is the source of this mapping?
jmarchon
blacklinkin (2022-08-29 18:11:33+00:00): hi, sorry, what do you mean?
I was hiking at those places and  found some water sources and camping grounds.
used organic mapps to add  those objects
somix (2022-08-30 13:36:09+00:00): Добрый день! В название не надо писать свое мнение или описание объекта, а только то, как он на самом деле называется.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-04 22:53:15+00:00): Hello blacklinkin,
It looks like the nodes that you've added here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983571919 aren't camp sites at all in the OSM sense - they are just somewhere ad-hoc that you pitched a tent.
For details of where it is appropriate to add camp sites, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp%20site?uselang=en-GB .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
blacklinkin (2022-09-05 17:13:10+00:00): hi, Andy. if I was wrong you can edit that camping spot
but as it's written in the FAQ, 
"A backcountry area with little to no facilities, often accessible only by offroad vehicle or on foot."
I think it describes the camping spot I used to sleep at.
How otherwise do I mark good ,flat  places for pitching a tent,often with a fireplace  ?
SomeoneElse (2022-09-06 14:33:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site does indeed say "A tourism=camp_site may be ... A backcountry area with little to no facilities...", but that does not mean that everywhere where it is physically legal and/or convenient to pitch a tent is a "tourism=camp_site".  It certainly isn't called "close to loch ness" either - that is just a description of where it is.

> How otherwise do I mark good ,flat places for pitching a tent,often with a fireplace ? 

As a bookmark within Organic Maps, perhaps?
Best Regards,
Andy
Claudius Henrichs (2022-09-26 14:20:40+00:00): Hi Max,
You added two pipeline ways spanning thousands of kilometers between nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089881971 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088308692
Those seem to be made up abstractions and not based on any Bing satellite imagery. Can you clarify what you intended with adding these to OSM? It seems currently they are more confusing than helpful in our database.
guerda (2022-08-29 09:12:42+00:00): Your change sets in the last couple of days were pretty big, spanning across France, Netherlands, Germany. Please consider uploading your changesets more frequently in StreetComplete, so that the changes are more locally focussed. Thanks!
Nachtspazz (2022-08-28 15:52:25+00:00): source should have been: "survey and GPS trace and Bing"
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 15:41:33+00:00): merged pre-existing node for that place with newly drawn poly, would attempt to ID the names of these places later
user_15552334 (2022-08-28 18:54:41+00:00): make changeset box smaller
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-28 19:10:49+00:00): Wycofane
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125491481
Allison P (2022-08-28 16:10:09+00:00): This section should be complete. There wasn't much left to begin with. I figured that conflating one-by-one in JOSM isn't actually much harder than in iD. There were so few that couldn't be done automatically that it was sometimes faster to do this than to bulk move the address nodes.

By making sure I do everything in JOSM, I also avoid accidentally marking garages as detached. I purge them when I see them, and I automatically filter out any buildings less than 100 square meters, but I missed three. This time, I caught them before uploading.
InfosReseaux (2022-09-01 17:50:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Qu'est-ce que cette zone dessinée avec un câble électrique autour de Denain s'il vous plaît ?
ThomasDu (2022-09-01 20:06:38+00:00): Bonsoir,
Bonne question, il faudrait sans doute la poser à  DalkiaTeam
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016209950/history#map=14/50.3194/3.3871
InfosReseaux (2022-09-01 21:33:43+00:00): Ah oui c'est vrai, au temps pour moi !

Je vais essayer d'en savoir plus

Bonne soirée
emersonveenstra (2022-08-29 19:02:12+00:00): Hi,

You misspelled the street name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983620096, I think you meant Northridge Drive but I'm not sure, could you please fix it? Thanks!
Keegs (2022-08-29 21:13:01+00:00): Whoops! Fixxed, Thanks!
Langlaeufer (2022-09-02 07:15:56+00:00): Den Änderungssatz meinte ich. Ist die Nienhagener Str. wirklich gepflastert?