piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kai Johnson (2024-01-19 21:07:31+00:00): Hi! I recently edited a few ways that you had tagged with natural=coastline;bare_rock. Normally, separating multiple tag values with a semicolon is fine, but natural=coastline is special. (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#Small_islands.) I wanted to let you know so that you can avoid problems with the natural=coastline tag in the future.
posiki (2024-01-21 13:49:30+00:00): Ok, thanks. I will avoid that in the future.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-19 19:02:35+00:00): Estimado. Por favor no cambiar clasificaciones de caminos sin antes consultarlo con la comunidad o por lo menos revisar la wiki. Este camino no es un primary
ivanbranco (2022-07-23 23:45:27+00:00): Hi vlas,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kol

you added a lot of wikidata values pointing the fruit of the tree, not the tree species. Could you check it out please?

Good mapping :)
ivanbranco (2022-08-10 21:22:01+00:00): Since you're still active but didn't replied I changed them with taxon:wikidata=Q129324

Good mapping
clay_c (2022-01-14 05:09:53+00:00): Changeset reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116132921

Unfortunately this changeset introduced a few tagging issues. For example, the NJ Transit train station at Union was already properly mapped as a node, and shouldn't have been merged with the station building. The building is a part of the station (building=train_station), not the station itself (railway=station). Also, "Train Station" is unnecessary in the name of a train station.

This changeset also brought in an improperly mapped multipolygon for the railway platform. A platform does not cease to be a platform when it is covered by a roof, therefore a roof should not be a member of a surrounding platform multipolygon relation.

Let me know if you have any questions. I know it's probably frustrating, but I hope it doesn't discourage you from editing. Most of the work you've done in the area seems good and well-detailed.

-Clay
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-12 09:15:12+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160951134 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001201127 überschneiden sich. Kannst du das noch fixen? 

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1

PS: Kannst du bitte aufhören, die generischen Kommentar "Verbesserungen" für deinen Changesets zu verwenden.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-12 09:15:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001201126/ und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001201127 überschneiden sich auch
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 15:15:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3702211964/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
Nikita Moiseev (2026-01-09 09:17:02+00:00): Dear Mateusz, thank you for pointing that out. I may have overlooked the figure. I have now corrected the data.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-09 10:47:21+00:00): thanks!
eggie (2021-11-10 20:59:16+00:00): Dag Takapau,

Probeer op de adresnode bij te taggen.
Dus niet nog een keer op het gebouw. 
Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken. Die zijn er al in OSM. Ik zal het aanpassen.
MVG
eggie
Takapau (2021-11-11 08:22:12+00:00): Hi, 

Ik wist niet dat er een verschil was in adres en gebouwnode. Is daar ergens documentatie van?
eggie (2021-11-11 08:35:36+00:00): Hoi... Het is niet eens fout..(dubbel taggen wel) , maar elke landelijke osm community doet het weer een beetje anders.
Wij in osm Nederland zijn een paar jaar terug begonnen met import van gebouwen en adressen vanuit de BAG. Toen hebben we in consensus besloten alleen de adresnodes te gebruiken om op bij te taggen.
Ook zijn er in andere landen verschillende verkeersregels. Dus daar wijkt de accesstagging bv af. Fietspaden in Duitsland bv.
De concensus ontstaat via het forum en wordt vastgelegd in de wiki... en die laatste is vaak onvolledig.
Zal je zo wat links sturen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-11 08:42:46+00:00): Zomaar een link waar zoiets wordt besproken op het forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58581
even googlen op adresnodes en je vindt er meer.

Verder heb je wellicht hier iets aan...
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

en vooral
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje ‘Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?’)

en zie dataimport... 
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap

Mapse,
eggie
DaveF (2022-02-07 12:50:27+00:00): Hi
Same here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13426778
s8evq (2021-11-10 22:52:05+00:00): Ik dacht onlangs gezien te hebben dat deze bank er niet meer was, zou dat kunnen? Ik zal er nog eens op letten.
L'imaginaire (2021-11-10 23:36:09+00:00): Zou uiteraard kunnen. Mapillary beelden zijn van twee maanden geleden, dus zou recent verwijderd moeten zijn.
wille (2021-11-26 12:35:59+00:00): Olá, Luisa

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113625838
silversurfer83 (2023-05-17 08:30:40+00:00): Hi
die Änderung ist zwar schon ein Jahr alt, jedoch fällt mir gerade auf, dass du hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273787264) aus einem Feldweg eine Straße mit Tempo 100 gemacht hast. Auf dem Luftbild sieht das noch sehr nach Feldweg aus. Falls es ein Versehen war, kein Problem. Einfach korrigieren, danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113625969
silversurfer83 (2023-05-24 17:35:10+00:00): Hast du dir mal Gedanken gemacht, ob das sein kann, was du hier eingetragen hast?
Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-06-06 06:34:33+00:00): Und?
Kays (2024-03-11 00:01:39+00:00): Did you mean to connect nodes 9241598605, 9241598608, 9241598606 and 9241598607 with edges to form the outline of a building?
wille (2021-11-26 12:36:59+00:00): Olá, Luisa! Fiz uma pequena correção na sua edição. Como o nome do colégio tá em outra geometria, não era necessário adicionar o nome na edificação. Obrigado pela contribuição!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113626070
mariotomo (2021-11-13 12:23:02+00:00): hi. "Naufragio" … that would be a shipwreck, right? the tag would be this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwreck
adrumillon (2021-11-14 23:12:26+00:00): Yes, it is indeed a shipwreck. It’s quite an attraction in the area.
mariotomo (2021-11-15 15:24:56+00:00): I'm adding two tags to mark it as a sea wreck. I'm removing the descriptive name.  if you can have a look at the wiki page and complete the tagging?
changeset:113810456
eggie (2021-11-11 13:08:50+00:00): Oke.. actueel gemaakt... maaarrrrrr...
website = 	www.gasterijalstoen.nl/  staat er nog steeds en klopt het telefoonnummer nog steeds?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113627345

Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-11 13:21:55+00:00): Website en openingstijden aangepast...
GielB2 (2021-11-11 16:41:19+00:00): Oeps, ik dacht dat ik de website ook had aangepast, ik zie dat jij het nu hebt gedaan.

Aangezien het telefoonnummer van het oude restaurant op de huidige website van de Limus staat neem ik aan dat dat klopt.

Bedankt voor de hulp!

Groetjes, GielB2
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 05:15:20+00:00): Ripeto: perché hai ri-cancellato i tag official_name:xx tag? Perchè hai ri-aggiunto place=nation? Sei l'unica persona a usare questo tag in TUTTO il mondo. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/place=nation

Hai commentato il changeset precedente come "(reverting changeset without reason and discussion, and also calling it vandalism)".

Quando è esattamente quello che hai fatto tu. Hai revertato la modifica della relazione Italia quando io stesso ti avevo commentato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113542902) e non hai risposto. Ovviamente la gente modifica without discussion se non rispondi, e non può avere una discussione. Inoltre sì, il tuo mi sembra un comportamento da vandalo: eliminare tag corretti come gli officiali name, revertare changeset altrui senza prima commentarli, appesantire una relazione già pesante come quella dell'Italia che è arrivata già alla v457.
Gonéo (2021-11-10 22:24:09+00:00): Il est possible d'utiliser `name` pour le nom courant si c'est celui que tout le monde utilise et qu'il est visible, et `official_name` pour l'autre.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
arkhi (2021-11-10 22:38:49+00:00): Dont acte. Merci !
hatul (2022-04-25 19:06:25+00:00): שלום יהורם

אתה בטוח שהמחסום הוא לשני הכיוונים? לפי הידוע לי זה שער חד כיווני.
VLD071 (2021-11-18 21:29:14+00:00): Hey Alexolb, thanks for your contributions to OSM. I came across a suburb place label named "Monkeytown" and can't confirm some of these place labels. Can you provide a source for the place labels you added in this area?
Thanks, Ryan
AngocA (2021-11-11 23:26:54+00:00): Hola, es tu primer cambio, pero veo que hiciste muchísimas modificaciones. Estás seguro de todos esos cambios?
wireguy (2021-11-15 14:32:34+00:00): Pete, can you look at the Matamoras boundary?  Southeast corner seems to be out of the relation.
PeteNH64 (2021-11-16 03:39:02+00:00): Good Catch :) - this is fixed

Thanks
Lee Carré (2021-11-13 09:17:03+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-11 09:46:27+00:00): Ciao Danilo. Vedo che hai cancellato l'itinerario G14 e non vedo modifiche. Puoi spiegare? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113629104
Jrachi (2021-11-11 16:38:06+00:00): Anch'io non capisco questa cancellazione.
Però vedo che hai modificato il percorso EVBAG140000 (r906817483).
Può essere che hai cancellato questo G14 per errore?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-20 11:53:37+00:00): Ho ripristinato.
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-11 14:15:13+00:00): Hi dufekin,

I see that you added landuse=grass and natural=grassland to the Black Kettle National Grassland relation.  Are you sure that the the entire protected area should be tagged in that way?  It is not a typical practice to tag land cover on a boundary relation, but rather to tag only the actual areas of that land cover independently of the boundary.  What are your thoughts on this tagging?
dufekin (2021-11-16 02:26:18+00:00): The protected area tag does not render, so I attempted to get the map to show Black Kettle National Grassland.  Adding those tags yielded the desired result.  I'm not sure of the appropriate tags for this national grassland, but it should show on the map.
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-16 03:29:58+00:00): Fortunately, there is very good documentation in the US for public lands:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands

Note that the tag leisure=nature_reserve (which you have on that feature) does render (green two-tone border).
mcliquid (2022-04-08 17:22:16+00:00): Hallo BaronVonHag,

du hast hier eine turn-restriction angelegt, welche den Verkehr auf der Grabserstrasse ausschließlich umkehren lässt (only_u_turn).
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13427076

Dies verursacht eine 10 Kilometer weiter Umfahrung bei der Durchfahrt bei Widen. Siehe http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=16/47.2003/9.4458/standard&lonlats=9.444337,47.197704;9.443135,47.202338&profile=car-eco

War das von dir so gewünscht oder sollte es ein "no_u_turn" sein?
Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung
jfd553 (2023-04-14 12:44:37+00:00): On y voit quelques montagnes mais pas le  lac Brome. Le point ne devrait pas plutôt être situé 2-3 Km plus au sud, toujours sur le chemin de Brill?
Lokai (2025-09-09 16:13:36+00:00): Hallo,

die Angabe access=agricultural verbietet auch Fußgängern den Zutritt zu den Wegen. Je nach  dem welche Schilder an den Wegen angebracht sind kann man vehicle=agricultural; forestry verwenden. Ich nehme auf Grund des taggings von einer Beschilderung mit VZ 250 und 1026-36 aus oder gar VZ 250 und 1026-38.
Den Schlüssel-Wert access=agricultural (Verbot auch für Fußgänger, Fahrradschieber, Handwagenzieher) habe ich bspw. noch nie gesehen, falls es dies gibt wüsste ich gern wo. Event. gern mit Foto.

Gruß
mueschel (2021-11-11 09:08:28+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys: It's the British "colour" instead of the US "color".
I fixed a couple of them in the past days, but not all of them.
LafarM (2021-11-11 23:58:14+00:00): Thank you for information. How can I search these mistakes in last changes.
mueschel (2021-11-12 19:29:20+00:00): You can use Overpass Turbo for this:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cY6
That's the objects with a "color" tag that were last edited by you.
LafarM (2021-11-12 22:56:26+00:00): Thank you for this information. I have received help from forum.openstreetmap.org. Now I have checked are and all mistakes with "color" are corrected.
Thank you!
eggie (2021-11-11 13:43:00+00:00): 
Dag Issa.. 
Je vraagt om een review.. 
Zo te zien is het allemaal oke en ligt alles op z'n plek.

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2021-11-12 20:34:09+00:00): What exactly is FIJI House?
Where is the name of that house located? Somewhere on the building?
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2021-11-11 13:37:31+00:00): Dag Issa.. Je vraagt feedback... Lijkt me helemaal oke zo.
Gr eggie
archpdx (2021-11-11 01:04:55+00:00): Linked wrong source - it should be https://www.co.washington.or.us/apps/permitsmisc/?tlno=1S212DB04200
mueschel (2021-11-12 10:43:33+00:00): Hi,
there are two 'strtu' tags here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1114885035

Could you check that?
mapper377 (2021-11-12 15:52:02+00:00): Thank you for finding these mistakes and notifying me. I have corrected these tags to be "structure=lattice" in changeset 113701978. I appreciate your help.
aweech (2021-11-11 20:19:00+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you added some very private information for a house like where the back doors are and even where the shower is. I believe that this runs afoul of OSM's privacy guidelines, so I removed the information. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for for information.

Also you've been putting address information on way too many features. Address information should only be on the main thing at that address. For a residence, that'd be the main building. For a school, that'd be the school grounds area. For a business, that'd be the POI node.
AgusQui (2021-11-27 20:56:36+00:00): El etiquetado correcto de un cabin de ferrocarril es railway=signal_box, y en este caso disused:railway=signal_box
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsignal_box
felipeeugenio (2022-07-05 18:34:38+00:00): Hola
Está Ollague entero dentro de un wetland, lo que es evidentemente falso.
Este polígono tiene alguna fuente e intentó expresar algo distinto? o es solo un error?
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-07-05 18:40:27+00:00): Ahí intenté dejar una figura un poco mas parecida a lo que se observa en la foto satelital, aunque me cabe la duda si wetland es un tag apropiado. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland)

Por otr lado, se ve que el salar cruza la frontera en la realidad. Se llama igual del otro lado?
trichocereus (2022-07-05 19:24:24+00:00): Si, Ollagüe completo está dentro de una prolongación del salar. 
Con respecto a la fuente, es reconocida su existencia por el SERNAGEOMIN https://portalgeo.sernageomin.cl/Salares/SALAR_DE_OLLAGUE/FICHA_GEOPORTAL_SALAR_DE_OLLAGUE.docx quien lo califica como una prolongación del Salar boliviano de Chiguana, el cual a su vez es una prolongación del Salar de Uyuni.
Por lo que veo en la wiki el tag wetland=saltern está desactualizado, ese es el que siempre vi que se usaba para los salares.
felipeeugenio (2022-07-05 19:37:54+00:00): ok, entonces el problema es el tag wetland. cuando tenga un minuto veo qué hacer.

pero lo mas probable es que haya que hacer polígonos separados

ahora la pregunta es: hay algo ahí que pueda ser catalogado de wetland? veo todo muy seco. No es como el Salar de Atacama.
saludos
trichocereus (2022-07-05 19:59:04+00:00): En ese salar, no. Es relevante aclarar que todos los salares son bien secos, el Salar de Atacama solo tiene unos pocos lugares húmedos (Cejar, Tebenquiche, Quelana, Tilopozo, etc...) que con suerte son como el 5%.
felipeeugenio (2022-07-05 20:07:00+00:00): ok, te agradezco
Colin Smale (2021-11-11 08:30:12+00:00): Hi! Not sure this is a good move. Boundary relations support outer/inner roles in the same way as MPs. Other protected areas happily use type=boundary. As an MP it still shows up on a map but map not get found in searches on the data as type=boundary is kinda expected. What was your rationale behind the change?
Cheers, Colin
Bexhill-OSM (2021-11-11 09:57:42+00:00): Yeah I wasn't sure, hence I why flipflopped. Checking through the wiki, MP mentioned it was best used for holes. But I'll revert the change since boundary makes more sense.
Cheers,
Alex
user_5359 (2021-11-11 18:59:21+00:00): Hello! You add a way without any useful OSM key (like highway=path)
Leon K (2021-11-12 10:56:48+00:00): Why did you undo the level crossing removal work at Edithvale Road?  The bridge is now completed.
https://levelcrossings.vic.gov.au/media/news/major-dig-done-at-edithvale-chelsea-and-bonbeach
timetotom (2021-11-12 11:02:29+00:00): Apologies - wasn't aware the works were being done or had been completed. I thought the bridge type crossing had been put in by accident.
Reza_koulivand (2021-11-11 06:28:04+00:00): سلام، خسته نباشید آقای revansafarii. 
شما منطقه مسکونی روستای بیدکلمه را به خانه  تغییر داده بودین، با اجازه من دوباره به منطقه مسکونی تغییر دادم. با تشکر
Arlo James Barnes (2021-11-11 23:33:28+00:00): Hi, I see your profile says you are an "Expert geographer with more than 20 years experience in making maps. including ensuring that the maps correctly represent the disputed views from country to country." Is it disputed whether w415257063 is a school or a catchment area?
PeteNH64 (2021-11-12 00:24:16+00:00): Hello James - my experience with Disputed views is about geopolitical disputes between countries.
The catchment area you reference was already present, my edits were only to correct the border along the county and state border where the area was crossing into another state and county invalidly.  I will go and review the validity of the actual area though, thank-you for bringing it to my attention
Regards
 - peter
Arlo James Barnes (2021-11-13 04:12:26+00:00): I see, thank you, Peter. I apologise for presuming it was your doing (it's difficult to tell post-deletion, although not impossible with specialised tools).
PeteNH64 (2021-11-15 19:42:19+00:00): Hi Arlo
no worries, after you brought this to my attention, i researched the poly area and found it to be invalid so removed it.
mosstreet (2021-11-11 11:44:23+00:00): Название ставим на территорию целиком, на здание нет необходимости дублировать и так ясно что там находиться
mosstreet (2021-11-11 11:48:15+00:00): building тег надо поставить на ДС 48 здание, не забываем что без этого тега здания на карте не будет
mosstreet (2021-11-11 11:49:08+00:00): Названия пишем с большой буквы
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 15:07:25+00:00): Can you please fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13427530
literan (2021-11-11 20:18:34+00:00): нет, КРИЧАТЬ не надо
Aville (2021-11-12 06:56:36+00:00): хорошо)
Negreheb (2021-11-11 10:37:26+00:00): Servus, heisst du zufällig Johann?
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 17:05:13+00:00): Никому неинтересно, сколько раз вы там были. Давайте комментарии к пакетам, которые описывают правки.

Также советую изучить мультиполигоны, чтобы не склеивать и не накладывать полигоны друг на друга. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD
Tim Stout (2023-10-07 14:16:12+00:00): Remove this now
HubMiner (2023-10-08 00:21:14+00:00): Justification?
Tim Stout (2023-10-08 02:55:45+00:00): We are not doing business on there
HubMiner (2023-10-08 03:17:53+00:00): You asked the remove the changeset, which affected 27 places.  Are you asking to remove a specific business?  Typically this kind of request is done by posting a Note.  Some kind of online proof that the place of no more, would be helpful.
opendcc (2021-11-11 10:33:58+00:00): Hello, is this building really named 'my home'? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 10:38:33+00:00): I don't think so, plus he changed a stadium in Paris to an helipad.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 10:41:07+00:00): I woud consider reverting this changeset
opendcc (2021-11-11 19:40:29+00:00): Hello,
reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113666167
@bikram bk: don't be angry, however changing a stadium to a helipad is an error which should be too long in the data base. If you have any question about OSM or help needed, please visit wiki.openstreetmap.org, the forum or ask any other mapper.

best regards
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 15:07:46+00:00): Can you please fix relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13427624
Glassman (2021-11-11 15:22:16+00:00): Old abandoned and razed lines might be better in OpenHistoricalMaps.org. If there was some trace existence then OSM would be appropriate but since this line is completely gone, I don't think it fits here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113636264
Vagabond photo (2021-11-11 16:06:06+00:00): Glassman: Thanks for your feedback. I'll look at your cited source. If it seems appropriate, and it sounds like it is, I'll try to remove this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113636264
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-11 10:46:54+00:00): Hi! Why are you changing the tagging from waterway=riverbank to natural=water + water=river? The first is a perfectly good way of tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank#How_to_map BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113636801
MapSpot (2021-11-11 17:31:25+00:00): Hi Andrea. I have been addressing several fixme requests and iD errors for imported landuse polygons. In this case, I made some adjustments to the geometry  because it was slightly too wide and erroneously overlapping other landuse areas.

In the iD editor it will sometimes ask to take extra steps like merging duplicate nodes, adding bridges and tunnels, and updating tags before saving changes.

I always make sure to check the surroundings before changing tags like these. If there are two adjacent river areas  with different tags in the same town, I believe it is bad to ignore it and not make them consistent so they are easier to index. I also make sure not to add water=river tags for canals and drains.

If I assign an inaccurate water=* tag, I will go back and fix it per request, like I have done with the water=stream areas earlier this week which you pointed out. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113460519
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113636801
eggie (2021-11-11 06:46:31+00:00): reverted own changeset
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-30 20:14:52+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.  I have resolved it for you here.

Please avoid this mistake in the future.
geozeisig (2024-06-01 14:33:16+00:00): Thanks
EneaSuper (2021-11-11 11:44:03+00:00): Ciao, credo sia sufficiente soltanto il poligono, ergo il nodo al suo interno di potrebbe benissimo cancellare 🙂
Davide Stasi (2021-11-12 13:44:06+00:00): Sono d'accordo, era una prova perchè sulla mappa viene visualizzata solo la scritta e non il simbolo del punto. Come bisogna fare?
EneaSuper (2021-11-12 15:37:55+00:00): Io ti consiglio, come detto, di lasciare solo l'edificio ed eliminare il nodo.
literan (2021-11-11 20:16:02+00:00): добрый день. Лучше не рисовать отдельными линиями тротуары, прилегающие к дворовым проездам. По проездам можно ходить где угодно, там пешеход имеет преимущество. А если отрисовывать их отдельно, роутинг будет ограничивать пешехода только этими линиями