piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
t_ja (2017-10-23 17:14:41+00:00): Ahoj,
týmito zmenami si tak rozbil prácu iných mapperov, že mi neostala iná možnosť, ako to celé vrátiť späť.
Popis problémov:
1) posunul si budovy podľa Bingu bez toho, aby si si najprv skalibroval mapu. Ak by si si prečítal odsek "Precision" na http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision , tak by sa ti to nestalo.
2) zakresľuješ budovy podľa ich strechy, pričom satelitné snímky nie sú fotené kolmo na zemský povrch, ale pod určitým uhlom. Preto gymnázium si posunul menej, lebo má menej poschodí, ako susedný panelák s deviatimi poschodiami. Budovy zo satelitných sníkom sa zakresľujú podľa obrysu ich základov.
3) existujúce budovy sú zakreslené z katastra, čo je momentálne najpresnejší zdroj k dispozícii. Zakreslené budovy sa len zriedka upravujú, aj to väčšinou v odľahlých oblastiach, kde kataster nemusí byť veľmi presný. V obciach a mestách sa to ale nestáva vôbec.
4) hlavný dôvod na odstránenie tvojich zmien z OSM je, že mažeš prácu iných mapperov a pritom si takmer nič nové nezakreslil. Potom výsledok je len zmena k horšiemu. Zmazaním sa stráca aj história objektov (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289820913/history ), preto sa majú existujúce objekty upravovať a nie mazať a vytvárať odznova. Napr. na vyššie zmienenom paneláku (a aj ostaných panelákoch popri ceste) sa tvojim odstránením zahodila informácia o počte poschodí, ktorú tam mapper prácne pridal podľa kamery, čo má v aute! Budovu môžeš zmazať, ak bola zbúraná v realite, alebo bola pri zakreslení odfláknutá a úprava jej geometrie do stavu podľa skutočnosti by zabralo veľa času (ale aj v tom prípade je nutné skopírovať pôvodné tagovanie na novú budovu, ktorú zakreslíš miesto pôvodnej). Ďalej si zmazal cestu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167879870 , aký si mal na to dôvod? Bola síce zakreslená pred piatimi rokmi, ale na bingu je stále viditeľná. Našťastie si nezmazal nič, čo by bolo súčasťou relácie, lebo o tých nič netušíš, a ani podpora vo webovom editore "iD" je veľmi biedna.

Zakresľovanie do OSM nie je síce raketová veda, ale takým "hurá" systémom ako si predviedol v tomto changesete to veľký prínos pre OSM veru nie je. Ak sa rozhodneš pokračovať, odporúčam začať niečím jednoduchým, napr. skalibrovať si Bing podľa existujúcich budov a nahratých GPX logov a dopĺňať nové veci ako cesty, chodníky, prípadne čísla domov, POI, atď. Takto rýchlo zistíš, že to, čo je zakreslené v okolí Rajca je celkom presné a nebudeš mať potrebu presúvať zbytočne pol sídliska. Hlavne buď opatrný pre menení dát a hlavne pred ich zmazaním! Takisto odporúčam pozrieť OSM wiki a niečo si naštudovať.

S pozdravom
Tibor

P.S: Nemá tvoj záujem o OSM niečo spoločné s OSM prednáškou, čo bola tento víkend v Košiciach?

O
Lebronslash (2017-10-23 21:43:48+00:00): Čau Tibor! V prvom rade ďakujem za konštruktívnu kritiku. Máš pravdu že som v tomto nový, avšak s čistým svedomím môžem povedať že som postupoval presne podľa inštrukcií úvodného OSM tutoriálu. Tam nebolo ani nič spomínané o kalibrácii mapy, s ktorou som sa pred chvíľou oboznámil. Avšak, aj keď si upravím posun mapy podľa satelitnej snímky, stále tie obrysy nesedia zase na iných miestach. Keď vravíš že budovy sú podľa katastra a že som vymazal prácu iných mapperov, je to tak, že v JOSM alebo nejakých iných advanced editoroch si ako podklad môžeš pridať katastrálne plány? Ja sa v Rajci pohybujem celkom často čiže tieto všetky objekty ktoré som upravoval celkom dôverne poznám a prišlo mi, že je tam množstvo nepresností (chýbajúce budovy - to som len zaregistroval, nepridával som ich; nepoprepájané chodníky; bazény na kúpalisku Veronika sú označené ako budovy; hranica pestovateľskej plochy vedie krížom krážom cez budovy ...atď.). Tá cestička končiaca uprostred poľa je úplný nonsens - neexistuje. Ten panelák ako vravíš som vymazal a znova pridal veľmi neuvážene, priznávam. Ešte ma štve jedna vec - napr. pri menšej mierke mi zobrazí celý tok potoka, potom po priblížení na väčšiu mierku jeho časť zmizne a objaví sa zase pri najväčšej možnej mierke. Neviem čím to je spôsobené. Takýmto spôsobom som editoval potok "Čierňanka" keď som si myslel že jeho stredná časť chýba :) P.S. o akcii v Košiciach som vedel, aj som chcel ísť ale nevyšlo to nakoniec, avšak myšlienka ma zaujala. Každopádne vďaka za rady, chcel by som sa zlepšovať. S pozdravom Miro
*Martin* (2017-10-24 08:52:51+00:00): Ahoj Miro,

Este k Tiborovmu prispevku dodam, ze tento edit nema nic s hotosm-project-3712 (http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3712), ktory si uviedol do hashtags.

Na kalibraciu map upozornuje napr. editor JOSM. Skus pouzivat ten. Je mi luto, ze editor iD na to neupozornuje, avsak umoznuje ju vykonat.

Katastralny podklad si mozes pridat pomocou pluginu kapor pre JOSM. Viac info mozes najst na osm_sk googlegroups fore, kde sa kludne pytaj ak mas otazky.

PS: nahodou som bol na Kosickom HOT. Dojmy z neho su take, ze HOT mapperom neide o presnost a +/- 20 metrov je pre nich ok. Mapuju sa vsak hlavne oblasti tretieho sveta kde nie su absolutne ziadne mapy, takze toto by tam mohlo byt tolerovatelne.
Alexander-II (2017-10-22 21:23:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258546620/history parking_space - это парковочное место под одну единицы техники. Смотрите в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=ru А то, что вы хотели отметить, это скорее всего сама парковка http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=ru
Alexheel (2017-10-22 21:38:45+00:00): Спасибо, сейчас поправлю
Alecs01 (2017-10-23 17:38:44+00:00): HI again, there are some strange relations here as well, this one is composed by just a subway entrance (and wrongly named) http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7671903 this one is made by a subway entrance and a tramway platform: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7671901 can you have a look?
andrewwiseman (2017-10-23 18:08:03+00:00): woo
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2017-10-23 07:12:20+00:00): Hi, die Ulmenstraße ist (meines Wissens nach) hier noch länger aufgerissen und unpassierbar.
Wieso hast du das geändert und magst du das bitte rückgängig machen? :-)
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2017-10-24 09:34:10+00:00): Ich habe es mal rückgängig gemacht, nichts für ungut, war wahrscheinlich einfach ein versehen
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 14:59:33+00:00): Hello, this seems to be a remote edit, can you please disclose your sources? I have found some problems with your edit, e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/251083102/history 
This was an object representing both, a Metro Station and a Train Station, and became effectively a metro station by adding station=subway in this changeset
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-22 21:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53163428 where the changeset comment is: Revert was not necessary. Sorry.
RicoElectrico (2017-10-27 14:42:09+00:00): Cześć. Przypominam, że oprócz nazwy ulicy trzeba zmienić ulicę w adresach. Poprawiam to.

Posty na forum: 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=389016#p389016

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=658213#p658213
berndw (2017-10-23 16:32:16+00:00): Ist der Rettungspunkt wirklich weg?
Als ich letzte Woche dort war, habe ich zwar nicht speziell darauf geachtet, aber IMHO hing der irgendwo  da rum
Ich komme da in der nächsten Zeit wohl nicht mehr hin, kann es nicht überprüfen
berndw (2017-10-23 16:33:37+00:00): Ansonsten würde ich den Punkt weiter in den Daten lassen, ihn aber mit einem FIXME versehen
DD1GJ (2017-10-23 18:26:08+00:00): Ich habe den Punkt sicherheitshalber wieder hergestellt. Falls das Schild weg sein sollte. mach bitte ein note an den Punkt, dann werden die Landesforsten benachrichtigt.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
Ahrtaler (2018-07-15 20:31:38+00:00): Ach du schreck vermutlich ist er nicht weg gewesen. Ich schreibe erst so spät, weil ich diese tolle Kommentarfunktion jetzt erst bemerkt habe.
Ich habe mich eigentlich nie um Rettungspunkte gekümmert. gut das du den wieder hin gemacht hast. Vermutlich bin ich irgendwann ausversehen auf entfernen gekommen oder sonst etwas. Extra war das Löschen dieses Punktes sicherlich nicht.
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 01:16:40+00:00): HI in this changeset way 202360158 has been tagged as foot=no, bicycle=no when it is also tagged as a public bridleway. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Bexhill-OSM (2017-10-29 11:03:46+00:00): Hi Mike, yes foot and bike traffic is split with horses at this point with a sign similar to this (http://news.eastsussex.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/07/Greenways-2.jpg).
Although, I should have / now will set the bridleway to horse=designated.
Thanks,
Alex
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 11:38:05+00:00): HI Alex, a public bridleway is legally open to cyclists and pedestrians, and is normally signed with the words "public bridleway". I suspect in this case, the way is probably not legally a public bridleway, in which case it should have the highway=bridleway tag, but not designation=public_bridleway. If the two run directly side by side, then just use a  single way, possible using cycleway=sidepath and similar.

Does that make sense?
Mike
Bexhill-OSM (2017-10-29 15:00:57+00:00): Mike,
Indeed, wherever the paths run side-by-side I have put them as a single way.
I was assuming because this horse only section that breaks away from the foot and bicycle path is still a Public Right of Way (see https://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/leisureandtourism/countryside/rightsofway/map/map.aspx, gridref: TQ770107), it still needed some kind of designation tag?
Alex
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 15:39:04+00:00): HI Alex, on the map shown, the bridleway and cycleway loop are shown as dotted lines, which according to the key is a licensed/permissive bridleway and hence  they are not public bridleways and should not have the designation tag at all. I'm very pleased to see a council not only providing this information, but also explicitly stating it can be used to update OSM!

Regards,
Mike
Bexhill-OSM (2017-10-29 15:59:59+00:00): Hi Mike, yes it's been an invaluable asset to finding paths around my neighbourhood to survey.  They also supply a wms overlay (https://data.gov.uk/dataset/rights-of-way-not-definitive-for-east-sussex) which works great with josm.
I'll remove those licensed/permissive designation tags on my next changeset - thanks for explaining and bringing this to my attention.
Alex
Almtesh (2017-10-23 10:05:09+00:00): Heu, si tu peux éviter de balancer des grosses modif comme ça sans aucun commentaire, parce que là, je surveille les modifications faites près de chez moi, et je ne sais même pas si ça me concerne ou pas.
Olyon (2017-10-23 13:49:20+00:00): Désolé, un oubli.
J'ai modifié contact:phone=* quand il y avait trop d'espace. (double espace ou espace a la fin du numéro)
Almtesh (2017-11-06 18:22:35+00:00): Ah, oui, en effet, je vois.
Phasme Musclé (2017-10-24 09:15:42+00:00): ou +33 (0)X XX XX XX XX
Olyon (2017-10-24 22:39:10+00:00): non. il est inutilisable comme ça. Il faut utiliser le numéro international. Si le numéro n'est pas utilisable a l'étranger comme les numéro cours ou ceux en 08 alors on n'utilise pas le +33 et donc 08XXXXXXXX
BCNorwich (2017-10-23 06:33:41+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say that your changes will not close the road.
With the gate separate from the highway there is nothing to suggest that it is a part of the highway.
The node (barrier=gate) needs to be joined to the highway in order for it to be rendered or seen as a restriction to the highway. 
As it is now, routers direct traffic along the highway past the gate which is to the side of the highway.

The square area you have mapped tagged access=no and barrier=gate is not attached/joined to the highway so does not restrict use of the highway. anyway I cannot see that this feature is actually a gate. Is it a fence?

The footway is well drawn and links onto Magnolia Drive correctly. However I think it is unlikely that "Unnoficial footpath when park gates are locked" is the paths name. It seems that this statement ought to be tagged as note=Unnoficial footpath when park gates are locked.

If you need any help with changes please just ask. Regards Bernard
JJIglesias (2017-10-23 08:10:55+00:00): Nice Job. Keep the good work
JJIglesias (2017-10-23 08:26:34+00:00): In Bolivia, there are woodland with no forestry, in osm "natural=wood", be careful using landuse=forest (managed woodland)
JJIglesias (2017-10-24 14:42:20+00:00): This natural features seems more Wood than Forest, from my point of view.
Thanks for editing #OSM-BO
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:35+00:00): Olá, pdnzjr.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:31:50+00:00): Olá, pdnzjr.
Nesta sua edição você criou 5 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Nakaner (2017-10-23 18:57:15+00:00): Dear operator of the "Serbian OSM Lint bot",

could you please pause your bot and answer me the following question: When was the usage of this bot discussed on the Talk mailing list?

The usage of bots in OpenStreetMap is ruled by the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards

Michael
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2017-10-23 19:20:52+00:00): Hi,
I pretty much followed code of conduct and bot wiki page can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Serbian-OSM-Lint
There one can find reference to github, report, local community discussion and inner workings of the bot (it is not bot, BTW, just misfortunately named, it is script). Does this answers your questions? If you still think it should be discussed in mailing list, sure... BTW, I will not be running bot until min(your reply, 3 days) :)
Nakaner (2017-10-23 19:46:01+00:00): Hi,

thank you for the link and the coding. I already had a look into the source code. I appreciate the idea but I do not like one part of the work your bot does: If your bot is able to transliterate Cyrillic to Latin characters automatically, we do not need that feature of the bot at all. If some value can be derived from another with a very small error rate, data consumers can do it on their own and we do not have to bloat up the list of tags of a feature.

The Serbian community might have a different opinion but I am sure that this remark would have been raised on the Talk list if you had followed the guideline literally. Could you please revert your the edits of your bot and start the discussion on the Talk mailing list (if I started it, it would sound like an accusation)? Doing a full revert and re-running the bot is easier than writing a special revert script which fixes a single error of the bot.

You are free to rerun the (maybe modified) bot after you have proposed the bot on the Talk mailing list. That's the only missing piece.

My usual response would be in case like this wold be to revert all changesets without waiting any longer but it is only one point in a long list you forgot (or you maybe misinterpreted).

Best regards

Michael


PS Please pause don't run the bot until the discussion came to an end and people had enough time to respond (i.e. release of next WeeklyOSM which mentions it + a few days).
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2017-10-23 20:09:33+00:00): Hi,
So, there is 280 changesets and while I did look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback, it seems there is no easy way to do it (unless coding it again:D). Any help is appreciated!

As for "name:sr-Latn", yes - it can be converted Cyrillic->Latin with 0% error rate, and it is there since I registered in ~2007 (ref: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stalker), so I guess it has been discussed:D

As for the mailing list, thanks, I think I will skip that part and just abandon this script and my work altogether. I will ask local community to push through if they want. Rationale: I have very little free time, and I work in large company; I want to spend that time doing stuff I love, like programming and working for open-source and/or community, and least thing I need in my free time is (more) bureaucracy:) Nothing personal!

I do want to fix those 280 edits, though, I don't want to leave mess after me! Again - help is appreciated.
Nakaner (2017-10-23 22:21:26+00:00): Hi,

if I often use https://github.com/woodpeck/osm-revert-scripts but it is not advertised widely to avoid usage by users who should not be know what is possible.

Best regards

Michael
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2017-10-23 22:34:25+00:00): I will clean up France. If there is any other country to clean up, LMK!
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2017-10-24 13:14:03+00:00): Removing all "name:sr-Latn" tag that were added, here is first 100, will be done in next 2-5h (or more, depending how fast I see those [y/n] questions:)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53207917

Here is script that is doing this:
https://github.com/stalker314314/serbian-osm-lint/commit/655979541e9d65c212a0187e9f9014a9455a551d

BTW, do I have to consult on Talk mailing list, if I use script only in country Serbia (not going across borders), just fixing internal Cyrillic-latinic problems?

Sorry once again for not honoring proper procedure
Nakaner (2017-10-24 14:45:53+00:00): Hi,

if your bot only edits in Serbia (according to the boundaries mapped in OSM), then no discussion on the Talk list is necessary. A discussion on that mailing list is only required if your edit covers multiple countries.

Best regards

Michael
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2017-10-25 08:21:57+00:00): Just to close on this, France reverted, thanks for noticing and help! Will stick to Serbia from now on
JJIglesias (2017-10-23 15:44:56+00:00): Gracias por Editar y contribuir en Bolivia. Exitos
eggie (2017-10-23 06:39:15+00:00): Beste Rumbly.. Geen wegen aan landuse plakken svp. Dat geeft problemen bij verschuiven. Dus voldoende inzoomen en steeds checken of de weg nog losligt.
Het grasveld aan de Meeuwenlaan zit vast aan de serviceroad. Ik maak het weer los. Graag reactie zodat we weten dat tips overkomen.
Mapping my own neighbourhood is te vaag commentaar.
eggie (2017-10-23 06:48:15+00:00): landuse losgemaakt  van weg
Nakaner (2017-10-23 14:48:33+00:00): Hi Omnific,

could you please stop uploading changesets which are part of imports using this account? The Import Guideline clearly says that imports must be done using dedicated accounts. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Please enter the correct sources into the source input field in JOSM if you upload an import. The wiki page of this import says that the data is neither from Bing nor from ESRI, is it?

Best regards

Michael
Omnific (2017-10-23 16:11:23+00:00): Actually, the guidelines on dedicated accounts are contested on the imports mailing list.

You should also have a note in the Task Manager with the correct source name, if you want a source name. Please see one of the other imports for the correct way to do this.

I will stop importing for this project.
cosmocatalano (2017-10-23 04:13:18+00:00): Feel free to drop me a line about this if you disagree or have additional questions. I do have reasonably thorough on the ground knowledge of the area.
marc__marc (2020-01-27 12:37:25+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534405746
what's this ?
in osm, a camp_pitch (campsite in American) is a part of a camp_site (campground in American).
but here, the part is outsite the area.
Regards,
Marc
majid1359 (2017-10-23 03:56:14+00:00): شیرینی سرای ملوان و تیپاکس انزلی به نقشه osmand  اضافه گردد
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-10-23 04:10:51+00:00): تغییرات لطفا کلوچه ملوان اضافه گردد به نقشه osm
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].