piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2018-04-09 05:11:31+00:00): If this edit was part of a hot task, it nice to leave the h#hotosm-project number on the changeset comment. It allows the team to pull reports on the edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57928538
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
IIVQ (2018-04-28 11:19:46+00:00): Beste Robin,

Als je voor zulke kortdurende werkzaamheden (14 dagen) de access=no zet, kan je die dan na afloop ook weer zélf weghalen? Nu routeert de weg niet goed, getuige https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1374499. 

Ik zal het voor nu verbeteren, maar let er op.
Wegenbouwert (2018-04-29 13:08:35+00:00): Ah ik zie het al, ik heb de delen ten zuiden van het viaduct wel weer gecorrigeerd, maar ten noorden niet. Excuses! Zie wijziging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58370285
kiggudde (2018-04-09 06:15:16+00:00): Hello evanpmlester, Thanks for mapping make sure whenever you are making edits please make sure add tags to feature before upload to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57929743
gscholz (2018-04-11 04:35:58+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.48521&lat=5.07798&zoom=18&opacity=0.74

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
SomeoneElse (2018-04-09 09:29:26+00:00): Can you explain why you made this change?  The previous two editors of this way are both local to Derby, and are familiar with the area.  Why do you think they are wrong?
will_p (2018-04-09 09:32:59+00:00): How do you know Thorntree Lane is bidirectional? You clearly haven't visited the location. I can see from the aerial imagery that the road is very narrow, so it is likely to be oneway. Additionally the mapper who originally added the oneway did so after surveying the area on the ground.

I recognise you were trying to fix a problem with routing (as previously tagged, if someone drove along Thorntree Lane there was no way out again). However, you really shouldn't fix problems by just guessing. In this case, I suspect the real solution requires additional access tags rather than just removing the oneway. There are local mappers in the area, so why not instead open a note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/new#map=18/52.92186/-1.47366) and ask them to check it out?

Your edits are particularly concerning because you are clearly working as part of a team, who are making similar edits over a very wide area. Have these edits been discussed with the community anywhere? Has a page been created on the wiki (or another location) where you explain the aims of your edits, plus details of who is organising them and so on?
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-09 11:50:11+00:00): The German forum has just become concerned about these edits too. Maybe a mapping party being not aware that they are editing not in a playground sandbox but within a live database used by others in real time?
SomeoneElse (2018-04-09 11:58:51+00:00): @kreuzschnabel Could you drop the DWG a mail please?  Just so that we have the full list of accounts involved.

I don't think that it's a mapping party, as they appear to be working exclusively in business hours UTC+5.  My guess is that some company is trying to "fix" OSM routing but doesn't understand what they are doing.

I've asked numerous questions via changeset discussion comments, block messages and private messages and have not received any satisfactory answers so far.
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-09 12:21:12+00:00): Done.
Dave Venables (2018-04-10 10:35:22+00:00): This section is definitely oneway. No egress onto Morledge. Clear no entry sign at the western end of this short stretch of Thorntree Lane.
Mirror image of the other end; one can enter Thorntree Lane from Saint  Peter’s Street or Morledge but must leave via Exchange Street. 
Entry from Morledge is oneway with a seven foot width restriction. Mainly used to access local business parking.
Dave Venables (2018-04-11 17:45:04+00:00): Entrances to Thorntree Lane from Morledge and Saint Peter's Street both now correctly show one way.
I've added a note on Exchange Street as it is currently just marked as Pedestrian only and I suspect there is a limited and conditional use by vehicles exiting Thorntree Lane to get to Albert Street.
I'll will update the note with further details when I'm next in Derby.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-11 18:26:07+00:00): @Dave yes - I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57999066 .
Supaplex (2019-02-08 15:20:33+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Axelos (2018-04-09 07:49:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci d'ajouter la qualité de ces micros chemins que tu ajoutes; tous les cyclistes ne roulent pas en VTT, tous les piétons ne sont pas particulièrement friands de marcher dans la boue …
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:tracktype

Aussi, soit certain de l’existence de ces chemins : mieux vaut ne rien mettre que mettre des chemins qui n'existent pas, la vue satellitaire possède ses limites.

Exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573407408
SomeoneElse (2018-04-09 09:21:00+00:00): You have changed the highway=construction to a highway=residential here (but left the construction tag), and claim that you used Esri World Imagery, yet that imagery clearly shows the road as being still in construction.
What is your source that the road is now complete?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
woodpeck_repair (2018-04-13 10:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58059521 where the changeset comment is: remove test edits made on live API
Supaplex (2019-02-08 15:19:59+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
whb (2018-04-09 20:09:48+00:00): Hi thanos,  

why did you delete the oneway?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25916221/history  
As visible on Mapillary, there is a "no entry" sign:  
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/wrGhkn5aus4FA4puwolqzQ  
https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/K6KwHiSMpxNg-29yHaTgmA/thumb-2048.jpg  

What is the source of this changeset?  
Your edits seem to be part of a series of co-ordinated edits.  
Who instructed you to do this edits?  
Have these edits been discussed with the OSM community anywhere?  

Best regards,  
whb
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
woodpeck_repair (2018-04-13 10:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58059521 where the changeset comment is: remove test edits made on live API
SomeoneElse (2018-04-12 14:17:17+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure about the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83871869/history here?  I can understand why you're confused that a road joins a bridleway, but how do you know that this is the road that is wrong, not the other one?
Best Regards,
Andy
robbieonsea (2018-04-12 21:08:14+00:00): A cursory look at other sources such as Bing, OS_OpenData_Streetview & NLS OS:1:25K sources suggest this is a track/service road to an isolated place in the middle of the Welsh hillsides.
Clearly bridleway is closer to reality than an unclassified road, although personally I would have made it a track.
trigpoint (2018-04-12 23:09:32+00:00): I can add some local knowledge here, this is a track leading to a what looks like a derelict farm, it is not a bridleway although I do not know its legal status.
The road labelled Mountain Track, some name tag abuse, is certainly not a bridleway. It is a track and based on experience the access=no tag is incorrect. It is at least motor_vehicle=private. In this area people have traditionally roamed the mountains pretty freely.
There are clear problems here picked up by the QA tool, but just making the problem disappear without understanding it does not help and makes problems harder to find.
Basstoelpel (2018-04-12 21:29:14+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM,

da Haslach keine Straßennamen hat, solltest Du dort nicht addr:street sonder addr:place verwenden. Damit sind ann auch die Q/S tools zufrieden:

https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#13/47.8054/10.3371/osm-wrongcity-wrongstreet-outsideplz

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
aceman444 (2020-05-06 06:26:46+00:00): Hallo, diese "Korrekturen" waren ganz sinnlos, Du hast die strassen unnoetig und falsch verschieben, die schon korrekt gelegen haben. Pass besser auf.
Bitte auch, sinnvolle Datensatzbeschreibungen schreiben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
scratera (2018-04-09 17:27:20+00:00): ciao esisteva già un'area pedonale qua contenente anche gli altri due nomi attribuiti alla piazza https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4284787
Aleks-Berlin (2018-04-10 07:25:57+00:00): Hi Teemu Piippo, you added a problematic key:  www.openstreetmap.org/way/507370962/history
Please fix this again.
Thanks, Alex
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Lokai (2018-04-09 14:33:43+00:00): Ahoi, dann schau mal hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbooks . landuse=retail dürfte falsch sein. Dort steht bestimmt ein Gebäude.
markusschneider (2018-04-09 21:27:10+00:00): Alles klar, muss ich nochmal in Ruhe angucken und dann richtig machen. Danke
Lokai (2018-04-10 04:21:14+00:00): Prima. Das Gebäude wird inzwischen nicht mehr dargestellt, sondern eine Fläche mit Name
Basstoelpel (2018-04-11 15:23:08+00:00): Hallo Jever61,

hast Du eine Erlaubnis, die Katasterdaten in OpenStreetMap zu übernehmen?
Sind die Gebäude im Kataster auch schon so windschief?
In addr:city gehört der postalische Ort, hier also vermutlich Varel. Den Ortsteil kannst Du dann mit addr:suburb angeben, aber das ist optional.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Nakaner (2018-04-11 17:07:13+00:00): @Baßtölpel Ich habe die DWG gebeten, tätig zu werden. Grund: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Nakaner (2018-04-18 13:47:25+00:00): Hallo Jever61,

diesen und einige andere Änderungssätze werde ich in den nächsten Tagen zurücksetzen, weil sie Daten des Liegenschaftskatasters enthalten.

Vor zwei Jahren haben wir schon einmal deine Änderungen aus demselben Grund zurücksetzen müssen. Dennoch hast du erneut das Liegenschaftskataster verwendet, obwohl du darauf hingewiesen wurdest. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497

Heißt das, dass wir davon ausgehen müssen, dass du auch in den Änderungssätzen, bei denen du das Kataster nicht als Quelle angegeben hast, das Kataster verwendet hast?

Die Benutzerkontensperre, die momentan besteht, kannst du aufheben, indem du dich auf openstreetmap.org einloggst und die Nachricht liest. Sie ist keine Strafmaßnahme, sondern soll nur das Lesen der Nachricht sicherstellen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2018-04-18 13:48:45+00:00): @all zusätzlich per PN benachrichtigt und auf diese Fragen hier hingewiesen
Nakaner (2018-06-09 17:42:39+00:00): Für das Protokoll: DWG erneut kontaktiert. Alles, was wegen Quellengaben ("Nieds. Navigartor AK5 V Farbe" oder Kataster) revertiert werden musste, wurde revertiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59696051
pitscheplatsch (2018-04-10 07:37:52+00:00): Hi Abhishek dogra, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong. You added a node in the middle of nowhere. Can you please correct your edit? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57932330
pitscheplatsch (2018-04-12 07:17:18+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58026621
eggie (2018-04-09 08:56:16+00:00): review.. Niks mis mee als het nu een bouwplaats is. Wel kun je concreter zijn in het commentaar bij je edit: Dus landuse=grass omgetagd naar construction. 
Even terzijde en los van je edit.. Het Huygenspark ziet er op de luchtfoto ook anders uit.
Hjart (2018-04-09 09:14:10+00:00): Please update your Maps.me map data for this area. You just created a duplicate of a restaurant which was mapped since august 2017
juestres (2018-05-03 09:18:06+00:00): Die Marktstraße ist für Fußgänger weiterhin begehbar. Daher sollte sie meiner Meinung nach nicht mit highway = construction gekennzeichnet werden. Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
SomeoneElse (2018-04-09 12:45:36+00:00): Hello __thanos__ and welcome to OSM,
Can you explain the source of your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23415395/history please?
Best Regards,
Andy
Alecs01 (2018-04-09 18:28:29+00:00): Per favore non insistere a creare parchi fittizi, che siano per attirare Pokemon o per qualunque altro motivo, come fa ad essere un parco https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=it una striscia larga due metri che copre giusto l'asfalto della strada? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578005616
Gh0stz0x (2018-04-13 10:35:45+00:00): Avrà visto dei richiedenti asilo sdraiati o a mangiarsi un panino... che c'è di male?? 😂🤣

Dai deltaniutron, fai il bravo ragazzo! 😁
Island Human (2018-04-10 00:36:51+00:00): Please keep edits small and to towns/cities, not the entire world. 

Thank you.
iriman (2018-04-10 21:26:31+00:00): It was just some namings, but ok I will limit my future uploads to smaller regions.
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:47:17+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:47:24+00:00): True
5m4u9 (2018-04-10 22:14:05+00:00): gracias por todas las ediciones, tener cuidado al hacer clic y borrar o mover cosas, a veces quitaste los negocios y los moviste a otros lugares, hay una opción a la derecha para ocultar negocios y otras cosas...
5m4u9 (2018-04-10 22:14:42+00:00): el mapa se puede ver con las aplicaciones de celular, mapsme, osmand, o las que utiliza semapa o la alcaldia
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
ivanbranco (2022-11-03 11:55:19+00:00): Hi alxm,

the second memorial value is a typo for stele?
alxm (2022-11-03 14:03:03+00:00): Yes, it's typo that went unnoticed for long time.
I fixed it and updated tags.
Thank you, and fill free to contact if you notice something wrong with my edits.
tux67 (2018-04-09 11:10:11+00:00): The previous edit was based on a local survey. Have you been there to verify the situation? 
What was the basis for your change?
chnav (2018-04-09 14:22:13+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы в этой правке наделали дубликатов дорог друг поверх друга и удалили арочные проезды. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее.
ff5722 (2018-04-10 11:01:17+00:00): Why did you delete all these boundaries?
Mac_01 (2018-04-25 13:56:23+00:00): Hallo Hermann,

ich hätte eine kleine Frage an dich: 

Welchen Vorteil bringt der postal_code an  Straßen ? Vor allem nur an ein paar Straßen wie hier in Augsburg ?

Durch die Admin Grenzen ist sind die PLZ Gebiete in Deutschland doch bereits sauber beschrieben. 

Aus meiner Sicht sind dies doppelte und unnötige Einträge in der Datenbank.

Viele Grüße

Mac
Cascafico (2018-04-09 09:39:49+00:00): Please, consider leaveing tag  highway=footway, since path isn't usually paved.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
dromedar61 (2018-04-09 09:55:49+00:00): ok.
(just for Information: in german wiki, this type of combined footway/cycleway should be mapped as path, even if it is paved: [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren]
Cascafico (2018-04-09 10:20:48+00:00): I see more examples here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples.
I consider footway, because isn't inappropriate nor inadequate.
chachafish (2018-04-10 02:52:25+00:00): Greetings and welcome to openstreetmap. You have many lines here that have no tags. Did you mean to create roads with these lines?
InessaZavada (2018-05-25 09:58:11+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, these were accidentally created. I'll be careful about this in future.
5m4u9 (2018-04-25 14:31:40+00:00): gracias por el importante mapeo de esta zona agricola
Basstoelpel (2018-04-12 08:22:44+00:00): Hi soerennb,

in addr:city sollte der postalische Ort eingetragen werden, hier also vermutlich Wöbbelin. Der Ortsteil kann dann noch mit addr:suburb eingetagen werden, aber das ist optional.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
glglgl (2018-10-18 13:40:30+00:00): Interessanter Gipfelname. Gibt es für den eine Quelle?
mrlanduse (2018-10-19 22:23:01+00:00): Sofort sperren, der Mann ist ein Exhibitionist! Obwohl – Frau Mönning sähe das wohl nicht so eng ...
Nakaner-repair (2018-10-20 12:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63702239 where the changeset comment is: Revert potential vandalism because the user did not respond to changeset comments within almost 48 hours.
derwaldmensch (2018-10-20 12:51:13+00:00): Der Gipfelname steht so im Gipfelbuch, dieses Gipfels. Vermutlich hatten die Erstersteiger ihn sich ausgedacht. ich finde das jetzt nicht so aufregend. Wer genauer forschen möchte könnte sich ja mal um den Nachlass von R. Buchner kümmern, ich habe da leider keinen Zugang.
Island Human (2018-04-10 00:36:15+00:00): Please keep edits small and to towns/cities, not entire countries.

Thank you.
mirror176 (2018-04-11 17:33:32+00:00): Just started as a goal to only update the Monday to Friday start time change. Tried to keep the edits to just those objects then; feels like what relations should be for though. Will linmit in the future and thanks for the feedback!
Basstoelpel (2018-04-11 16:24:18+00:00): Hallo Tleclh,

ist das die Neuenlander (addr:street) oder Neulander Straße?

https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#16/52.9712/9.5110/osm-wrongcity-wrongstreet-outsideplz

Baßtölpel
Tleclh (2018-04-11 16:38:32+00:00): Hallo,
das ist die Neulander Str., wurde geändert.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Grüße,
Tleclh
nevw (2018-04-09 13:15:49+00:00): Welcome to the OpenStreetMap Michael Dobson. I have noticed unusual mapping by you this evening, including changing the shape of buildings on the Warburton Golf Club, shifting The Patchwork Tea House from it's location on to the Warburton Highway and finally deleting the the Warburton Golf Club entirely.
This is a public map. Are you intending to correct or remap these items or should I or a local mapper revert the changes entirely?
nevw (2018-04-11 12:58:45+00:00): I have reverted the changesets around the Warburton Golf Club area to original state after no response from query of unusual edits.
HolloWorld (2018-06-07 19:27:01+00:00): Hi, highway=bus_guideway are not road use for bus only, it's a guideway. If this road is not guideway, can you comment here or change it into highway=service+access=private+bus=designated ? thanks !
abakus_uploader (2018-04-09 22:30:47+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
5m4u9 (2018-04-25 15:17:24+00:00): hola, en ortas ediciones no borrar edificios para luego volver a crearlos, este mapa no funciona así, se debe modificar y no borrar, salvando excepciones...
eggie (2018-04-10 08:32:28+00:00): Wanneer iets eenrichting is zijn (brom)-fietsers vaak daarvan uitgezonderd. Is dat zo hier?
Dan erbij taggen
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no
opendcc (2018-04-09 14:03:23+00:00): Hallo,

wenn diese Straßen freigegeben sind, dann müssen Sie das Attribut 'access=no' löschen. Die note ist nur ein Kommentar für andere Mapper, hat nichts mit der Kartendarstellung oder dem Routen zu tun.

Viele Grüße aus Mühldorf
opendcc (2018-04-09 20:04:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das access=no überall weggenommen.

Viele Grüße