piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Savo25656 (2025-06-27 14:20:33+00:00): Yes, I saw that decision too, they are essentially similar.
Unfortunately, it is not easy to see the new signs in the field, I did not find any. I assume that it is a matter of paying too little attention to the signs, in fact, most information boards on roads only write the name of the larger city without the number of the road to which that direction leads.
Also, in the media, for example, in accident reports, old signs from the Yugoslav era are used.

You may find the brochure/study on traffic counting useful, unfortunately the last one is from 2019, but it uses new signs on the maps.
https://www.putevirs.com/korisnik/dokumenti/Brojanje_vozila_u_RS_2019.pdf

https://www.putevirs.com/index.php?jezik=sr&idm=12&idpm=14&meni=%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B1%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82-%D1%81%D 0%B0%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%9B%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%B0&item=%D0%91%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%98%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%9B%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%B0&description=Traffic-counting

Regards, Savo
SunnyIsland10 (2025-07-02 14:38:02+00:00): Greetings Savo25656

Thank you so much for responding to our messages and sharing this information. 

Have a great day,
SunnyIsland10
one_half_3544 (2021-10-25 11:55:29+00:00): Добрый день,

Пожалуйста, не надо создавать точки, содержащие имя пользователя (мив) в имени.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ser9ei (2021-10-20 18:59:55+00:00): теги типа Кафе=У Галины в osm не имеют смысла и не будут отображены ни на одной карте, использующей базу osm.
Есть общепринятые теги, с описанием которых можно ознакомиться в вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dcafe

Если лень читать, то спросите в телеграм-чате @ruosm

То, что сделали вы, работать не будет.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ser9ei (2021-10-20 18:55:07+00:00): От того, что вы в name напишите "лыжня", линия не станет лыжнёй. Для всего (или почти всего) есть свои теги: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Piste_Maps

И никогда не пишите в name ничего, кроме наименований. Не надо подписывать объекты. Надо просто им присваивать правильные теги.

Вы можете задать любые вопросы в телеграм чате сообщества @ruosm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112736086
eggie (2021-10-20 10:26:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback : De man_made=pier in het midden van het vlak kan beter weg. Die is nu overbodig.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-21 18:38:53+00:00): Het lijnelement man_made pier heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kartler175 (2021-10-26 10:24:04+00:00): Multipolygone kennen Mitglieder mit der Rolle 'member'!. Mitglieder mit der Rolle 'inner' gehören gemäß Definition nicht zum Multipolygon-Objekt. Das ist wohl hier nicht der Fall. Also ist hier ein Multipolygon unangebracht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skyper (2022-08-05 12:05:02+00:00): Hallo Udo
`access=no` ist meist zu fehleranfällig, da einige Transportmittel vergessen werden.
Im konkreten Fall wäre ich gespannt auf die Beschilderung vor Ort. Hängt da wirklich ein 250 + 1022-10 oder doch eher ein 260, was durch ein einfaches `motor_vehicle=no` abgedeckt ist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland)
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
kozlorf (2021-12-20 21:07:14+00:00): Czy na dodanej ścieżce jest może wytyczony szlak Nordic Walking?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994867096#map=17/52.73261/23.61256&layers=N
SLBM (2021-12-20 23:58:30+00:00): Co najmniej częściowo tak, aczkolwiek nie znam całościowego przebiegu, bo nie podążąłem jego całą trasą, stąd nie mogłem go oznaczyć, bo brakło mi wiedzy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:22:54+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:23:04+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SekeRob (2021-10-20 11:12:51+00:00): Hi,

Other than the straight on was mapped inverse, should have been east to west - from, via, to -. the rule is required as signed coming from Pennapiedimonte  crossing the bridge i.e. propose to put it back but than the correct way. A stop sign signifies the right of way is for those coming from Guardiagrele going west.

cheers
n34s (2021-10-20 21:33:01+00:00): My bad. I deleted relation 11874366 because i thought that the other pre-existing relationships could do without it. I wanted to obtain a route that doesn't necessarily have to pass through the hairpin bend when this maneuver is not imposed by the actual signs, in particular coming from Rapino to Pennapiedimonte and vice versa. I've sharpened my eyes and self-learned to edit (and eventually enrich) these relationships.
I saw that you already corrected the direction in relations 11874365 and 11874364 as per changeset 112741546 so, in place of the previously deleted relation 11874366, i just added 2 new relations in node 1027911370 for both Via Occidentale (way 869906316) and Strada Statale 263 di Val di Foro e di Bocca di Valle (way 869906318) with changeset 112764065, in order to legitimately restore restriction=only_straight_on where needed on this junction. It should now work as expected 🙂
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
DK7080BE (2021-10-20 14:18:49+00:00): Så vidt jeg kan se, er der ingen adressepunkter ved Google Datacenter bortset fra en kantine på Prinsessens Kvarter 10  --  Burde det ikke være det?
osmviborg (2021-10-20 14:42:44+00:00): Jo, lidt mærkeligt. Det er Fredericia Kommune der håndterer det. På firmaets hjemmeside er ingenting. https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/locations/fredericia/
mavl (2021-10-21 14:30:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названии остановок не нужно указывать "Остановка автобусов". Это уже следует из тега автобусной остановки.
mueschel (2021-10-23 12:48:34+00:00): Hi,
I found a couple of strange tags here like "  Тоннар 4 = Молоко" - could you explain what they mean?
tux67 (2022-10-18 11:54:18+00:00): Hi,

um den Marienplatz sehe ich so viel access=no -ist das nicht ein bisschen rustikal? Fußgänger dürften demnach auch nicht. Es geht doch nur darum, als motorisierten Verkehr nur psv zuzulassen, oder?
mueschel (2021-10-23 12:47:36+00:00): Hi,
could you check these streets you edited? Some of them got a strange "عمارت دهدشتی" tag.
olo81 (2021-10-21 17:05:12+00:00): Adresy budynków to zupełnie co innego niż nazwy ulic. Nie wiem czy widziałeś ale przy ulicy Wolskiej jest tabliczka z nazwami ulic. 
Wycofuje edycje.
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:23:28+00:00): A to przepraszam :)
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 17:36:54+00:00): Ciao, esiste anche un numero civico per la chiesa ? Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112740664
Consorzio Pro Loco Arcometa (2021-11-02 11:06:47+00:00): No, non risulta nessun numero civico.
gscholz (2021-10-31 08:46:34+00:00): Hi Antonio,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "BNH IV Plano" and "Vila Erondina":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-54.81976&lat=-22.25227&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112740837

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-01-06 08:35:45+00:00): Hi Antonio,
this error still exits, can I get your response here?
Guido
Mannivu (2021-10-20 14:34:00+00:00): Sarebbe interessante anche spiegare perché queste strutture sono state rimosse dalla mappa. Non esistono più? Non sono mai esistite? Un oggetto più esplicativo aiuta tutti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112740900
Ars-UA (2021-10-20 15:11:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не добавляйте, пожалуйста, на общую карту несуществующие объекты (бары). Если увидели неточность, добавьте заметку и кто-нибудь из опытных пользователей исправит.
Vas111 (2023-08-12 11:00:09+00:00): На участке шоссе "дорога для автомобилей" maxspeed не может быть RU:motorway так как это не автомагистраль и значение явное, то есть надо ставить maxspeed=110. То же самое на участке где знак 90; надо ставить maxspeed=90
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Awoobis (2023-09-29 13:19:38+00:00): Why are the parking lots marked as parking spaces with capacity of 1? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994906765
Frans S (2021-12-03 13:24:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112744640
DaveF (2021-10-23 23:36:39+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass is not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
VA00 (2021-12-27 15:44:34+00:00): Boisko faktycznie solidnie zarośnięte, ale scrub to raczej małe drzewka lub krzewy
adrianojbr (2021-11-12 23:47:53+00:00): Prof. Douglas, esse ponto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9187291636) ficou incompleto. Você pode corrigir?
Prof Douglas Teixeira (2021-11-13 00:10:37+00:00): O que?
adrianojbr (2021-11-13 00:47:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9187291636

Só está com nome.
SekeRob (2021-10-20 16:47:49+00:00): Hi,

Why did you change the stream to a very very long steps, the longest in the world probably.

cheers

PS there is a sentiero but it needs mapping separately. A little piece already is there at the top near Via Caduti di Marcinelle by the name of Sentiero Serafino Razzi.
Protoxenus (2022-10-21 16:46:14+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier einen Punkt mit einer Internet-Adresse gesetzt. Würdest du da ein vollständiges mapping draus machen?
Gruß Protoxenus
eggie (2021-10-21 08:52:19+00:00): Dag Martijn..  Wellicht access=private op die opritten erbij zetten?

MVG
eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-10-22 14:31:20+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,
Bedankt voor de aanvulling.
wat mij opviel was dat er ook een melding over het Fietspad kwam.
ik kon alleen niet achterhalen wat er bedoeld werd (vandaar de check vraag).

m.vr.gr.
Martijn.
eggie (2021-10-22 14:41:43+00:00): Dag Martijn..
Het fietspad langs de Crailoseweg heeft geen verbindingsnode met de Prina Hendriklaan.
Dat is de foutmelding.
Dus een verbindingsnode maken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-22 14:44:10+00:00): Het fietspad bij Paviljoen Heidezicht zit in de knoop..
Die heb ik net ontward,
eggie (2021-10-22 14:56:37+00:00): Wanneer je in josm recht in het validatorvak klikt met de rechtermuis op de foutmelding heb je de keus Inzoomen op probleem. Dan kom je er van zelf.
eggie (2021-10-22 15:57:26+00:00): Verbindinsgnode toegevoegd aan kruising fietspad met Prins Hendriklaan.
mueschel (2021-10-23 12:50:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check these edits? There are two areas like this one with only foreign tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994922833
hanzlan (2021-10-24 07:49:46+00:00): Hi,
thank you for double-checking it. I've just deleted these two polygons.
maraf24 (2021-10-20 18:01:27+00:00): Skąd są te przebiegi dróg? Kiedy budowa?
Jest to potrzebne do weryfikacji - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
user_11418917 (2021-10-22 10:28:34+00:00): Reverted! Stop the vandalisms!      
First of all this is the Israeli side not a "Palestinian Arab neighborhood" meanwhile the Christian can speak Arabic but they are not Arab nor Palestinians, they are Israelis and every road sign in this neighborhood is in Hebrew, I've been there. I saw it with my eyes! Stop the vandalisms edits.        
You are vandalize the map all around the world like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100090200 when you deleted all roads numbers! and other vandalisms in the Gulf region etc.. stop it. y'all iranian vandalists should stop these vandal edits! stop!
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-22 14:39:12+00:00): what? what are you talking about? 
Iraq and Persian Gulf edits don't have anything to do with Jerusalem.

How is Christian Quarter different from Silwan, or Beit Hanina, or Ra'as al Amoud, also in Israeli-controlled Jerusalem, Also predominently Palestinian-Arab?

Not Just in Jerusalem, but in Israel proper as well, Arabic speaking communities, have their main nametag in Arabic. Look at Galilee, or look at the area East of Beersheba.
user_11418917 (2021-10-22 14:45:58+00:00): You are vandalizing the map, you removed every road number in Baghdad roads, you were with the iranian vandalists who edited the gulf you did it at least 6 times! Now you’re changing this over and over! This is considered as edit war, and you should just stop.. stop your vandalism.
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-22 14:58:51+00:00): Look, let's put Baghdad and Persian Gulf aside for now. Focus on this topic right now. They have nothing to do with this.

For the matter of names in Israel-Palestine, I specifically checked in the forum of OSM editors about a year ago, asking what the policy is for naming. The policy is, each town and neighborhood will be either Arabic or Hebrew, depending on the predominant language of its residents.

Explain how the Christian Quarter shouldn't get an Arabic principle name tag similar to Arabic speaking communities in Israel-proper (which include Muslim, Christian, and Druze communities). You yourself stated that the Christian population of the neighbourhood are predominantly Arabic-Speaking. (and every road sign in Jerusalem is trilingual, Arabic Hebrew English)
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-22 15:05:32+00:00): Here is where I checked with Israeli forum of OSM editors about place names in Israel-Palestine
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71448
user_11418917 (2021-10-22 15:59:08+00:00): First of all I mentioned those edits of yours because they are vandalisms too by you, the same user.       
     
2nd of all I never said "predominantly Arabic-Speaking" I said "they are Israelis and every road sign in this neighborhood is in Hebrew, I've been there. I saw it with my eyes" go up and read.           

3rd of all, the link you posted do not have any source if those are predominantly Arabic-Speaking, so if you want to edit the main 'name' tag please put sources for your edits.   
     
Finally if you're real serious about what you said, that the 'name' tag should be in the predominantly speaking language, then why don't you edit the Arabian neighborhoods and cities inside your country Iran and put the Arabic name as the main one since they're predominantly Arabic-Speaking? Can't wait to see you edit those cities if you're real serious.                 
            
Best Regards.
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-22 16:44:59+00:00): You're now being racist and dismissive of the topic for no reason, without me even telling you whether I'm Iranian or not. 

Would you like to discuss this matter seriously or not?

Here, this source states that Christian Quarter is home to Arab Christians, similar to Beit Hanina and Beit Safafa. 

"Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research" is a well respected institution, cited many times by Israeli ministry of foreign affairs

https://jerusaleminstitute.org.il/blog/%d7%a0%d7%95%d7%a6%d7%a8%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%91%d7%99%d7%a8%d7%95%d7%a9%d7%9c%d7%99%d7%9d-2/
user_11418917 (2021-10-22 18:21:42+00:00): Says the one who have a Persian Gulf profile picture in the Iranian way in other forums and websites which clarify the face your political opinion, I've seen enough of what you typed online, and it's getting me sick actually, but I'm gonna respect the fact that this is a different matter and we only discuses things that happened in OSM, so in OSM you're a vandalist.   
  
I always have good faith in people, but you sir didn't left any chance for. I said if you really care about the names why don't you apply what you said for your country? if you do it then yes you did it in good faith, it's that simple. Getting political is not welcomed in OSM, please read the guidelines maybe it will help.          
Now about your link, a simple google search says Population of Beit Hanina is over 27,000 while your link says "number of Christian Arabs live are Beit Hanina is 3,100", same for others.      
As I said, if you want to "correct the name" tags of neighborhoods you should start with an area you are familiar with like your country, Iran, I see lots of Arab neighborhoods with Persians names, maybe you need to fix them.          
I'm done here, discussion with you without seeing an actual changes from you is a waste of time, if you're really edit in good faith go fix your vandalism in Baghdad and bring back the road numbers that you deleted first, after that I'm open for discussions.        
Best regards.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-23 10:10:39+00:00): @lockdownguy please calm down.  Repeated accusations of "vandalism!" don't reinforce whatever point you are trying to make.
There is a genuine discussion to be had about what names should be used; NFZANMNIM did the right thing by asking at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71448 (and it would have been helpful to mention that at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112279744 too; I've now added that link).
@lockdownguy if you find yourself annoyed by something it often helps to take a break before replying rather than "venting your spleen" via the keyboard.  If you make further accusations of vandalism like this where it isn't justified we (the DWG) will have to consider enforcing a break from OSM via a short block.
Re the road reference numbers in Baghdad, I'll comment somewhere more relevant.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
user_11418917 (2021-10-23 10:25:53+00:00): Dear Andy,         
First of all I believe you didn't read or understand the situation well unfortunately, please read the whole discussion here, also please what I commend to you here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112830850         
About calling him a "vandalist" this is not me, this word came from the DMG calling the users who were editing the name of the Persian Gulf, he was one of them, the DMG called them "nationalist vandalism" I'm not the first who said it, this is exactly the same matter. he was vandalizing all around the middle east in the gulf, Baghdad, and Israel and you didn't even told him to stop? while me the one who's restored it getting told to "take a break"?         
About the link of the forums he didn't say which neighborhoods he will edit, and this is wrong.     
At the end, if he want to edit a neighborhood's name tag he should add sources, unsourced edits that changes name of big cities and neighborhoods should be reverted until provide some sources by the name who changed the name.         
Best Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-10-23 23:59:20+00:00): Dear @ SomeoneElse, please read my comment here:             
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100090200        
Thank you..
eginhard (2021-10-26 20:33:17+00:00): I see you added a fixme to this way indicating that it's missing a feature type: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988638272
As you see at that link it's part of a multipolygon relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon) that forms the boundary of a residential landuse area. You should also see it in the iD editor at the very bottom when clicking on it, although sometimes it might mistakenly say that it's part of zero relations when not enough other parts are visible. For this type of line it's ok to not have any tags, you'll find the relevant tags on the relation when clicking on it.
Feel free to reach out if you have any questions!