piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2018-11-29 17:55:41+00:00): Prosżę nie kasować i tworzyć nowy, ale przesuwać przystanki.
KAROL1966 (2018-11-29 19:05:26+00:00): Bardzo chętnie, tylko nie umiem. Jakaś instrukcja?
maraf24 (2018-11-29 19:57:41+00:00): Przystanki jako punkt nie są z niczym połączone, więc przesunięcie ich jest prostą czynnością-w tym edytorze.
Tutaj już przesunałem.
woodpeck_repair (2018-11-27 08:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64924310 where the changeset comment is: Restoring Ukraine as per https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea . See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2347 for more details.
fkv (2018-12-15 19:42:06+00:00): Bitte ändere nichts an Dingen, von denen du nichts verstehst. Die Burbachspalte und die Burbachhöhle wurden benannt von H. und W. Hartmann in den Höhlenkundlichen Mitteilungen 6/1981 nach einer Angabe von Calliano 1886, der den Burbach mit weichem B schrieb. In der Josephinischen Landesaufnahme hieß der Bach Buberbach. Weil heute der Purbach meist mit hartem P geschrieben wird, habe ich die Höhlennamen mit hartem P in alt_name=* gesetzt. Diese Tags hast du bei deinen Änderungen einfach ignoriert. Jetzt steht in name=* dasselbe wie in alt_name=*, was alt_name=* seines Zwecks beraubt. Aus allen diesen Gründen werde ich die Namensänderung rückgängig machen.
fkv (2018-12-15 19:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65507872 where the changeset comment is: revert 64915312
Moti18 (2018-12-16 23:27:22+00:00): Der Höhlen/Spaltennamen beziehen sich auf den daneben fließenden Bach. Es ist durchaus üblich im Falle einer Namensänderung des Bezugsobjektes  generell Namensänderungen durchzuführen. Wird zum Beispiel Stinkenbrunn in Steinbrunn umbenannt, dann werden auch die Stinkenbrunner Seen in Steinbrunner Seen umbenannt. Da aber deine Revertierung mit so netten und  schmeichelhaften Worten erfolgte und du dich auf 1886 berufen kannst wollen wir es dabeu belassen. Obwohl ich es grundsätzlich bedaure, dass die Open Street Map von so unbedeutenden Felsnischen zugemüllt wird.
fkv (2018-12-17 00:16:48+00:00): Der Höhlenname im österreichischen Höhlenkataster wird immer noch mit weichem B geschrieben, und du bist keiner, der über eine Umbenennung zu entscheiden hat. Du bist weder der Katasterwart noch der Entdecker der Höhle und vermutlich auch nicht der Grundeigentümer. Wenn du bedauerst, dass OSM mit Daten "zugemüllt" wird, dann benutze einen Renderer, der nur die Daten anzeigt, die dich interessieren, oder Google Maps etc., wo gar keine Höhlen drin sind.
LySioS (2025-02-16 13:33:22+00:00): Hello, c'est normal d'avoir enlevé les amenity=police au profit de emergency=mountain_rescue

Les 2 ne devraient-ils pas cohabiter ?
Talitha IRM-ED (2020-08-18 06:57:05+00:00): Hi, SimonXiuLi. I realigned this road and added unclassified tag (way 64915726). I also added bridge because it crossed with waterways. Thank you
viloan (2018-11-27 00:16:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trigpoint (2018-11-28 12:45:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. When adding things to OSM please check that what you are not duplicating existing features. The Kendal Caravan club site already exists, I am removing this duplication.
Cheers Phil
chnav (2019-12-11 02:06:39+00:00): Please do not edit road status in external regions. You are addicted to make statuses higher then used for local and transit traffic. Thanks.
Hjart (2018-11-27 05:53:29+00:00): Bemærk at denne fakta i forvejen var markeret og at vi stræber efter at undgå dubletter
Hjart (2018-11-27 05:55:56+00:00): Bemærk at denne SuperBrugs i forvejen var markeret og at vi aktivt søger at undgå dubletter
FredrikLindseth (2018-11-28 10:14:04+00:00): You should remove these shops. They existed as nodes in the buildings, before you added them again to the outline of the building
FredrikLindseth (2018-11-28 10:20:28+00:00): I fixed these and the other shop you did the same with. I kept your building outlines, but removed the duplicate shops
bagage (2019-12-22 19:33:18+00:00): Quel est ce bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6094133577 ?

Je trouve aucune référence avec ce nom sur les moteurs de recherche.
AL68 (2019-12-31 17:05:03+00:00): C'est un chalet dénommé ainsi par son proprietaire j'imagine. Ce n'est pas un commerce.
bagage (2019-12-31 17:46:06+00:00): Noté, merci :)
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 03:35:11+00:00): This house is in the middle of the street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64917439
Palolo (2019-01-03 00:38:21+00:00): @airport_boy Thank you for helping map Ethiopia.  Please note that only 1 tag is needed for building=yes.  You tagged each of the nodes with a building tag.
eggie (2018-11-27 07:33:08+00:00): Hoi.. Kijk even in de wiki welke tags erbij horen. Alleen een naam is niet voldoende. 
amenity=clinic? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
MVG,
Eggie
Hjart (2018-11-27 06:18:08+00:00): Bemærk at denne ændring er rullet tilbage da den fejlagtigt ændrede en ikke relateret naboadresse
viloan (2018-11-27 02:20:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-11-27 02:26:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PLima785 (2018-11-27 14:56:09+00:00): Boa tarde, parte da avenida Dom Afonso Henriques podes por como área pedonal, assim como passeios e zonas de pedestres mais afastadas da estrada.
viloan (2018-11-27 02:38:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Supaplex (2018-11-27 16:35:23+00:00): 這應該不是警察局體系的吧?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64919050
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Филиппок (2018-12-26 15:41:34+00:00): На всех конечках есьже место для разворота , если нет то по перекрёсткам круг дают .
Филиппок (2018-12-26 15:42:18+00:00): Разворотными площадками для бусиков пользуются фуры .
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 03:35:40+00:00): Except for the intersections at 36th and Gilcrease.  It's a trunk.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64919426
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 03:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64957536 where the changeset comment is: This is a trunk, it has surface intersections.
Duke87 (2018-11-28 04:19:58+00:00): I can appreciate that there are two intersections at the north end of the road, and if you look at my changeset you may note I left that section as trunk.

But, why would two intersections at one end, spaced ~1/4 mile apart, disqualify the entire remaining 2+ miles of the road which are built to full freeway standards from being given the corresponding "motorway" classification?

There is considerable precedent for this, including the adjacent Gilcrease Expressway which is part motorway and part trunk.
us89 (2018-11-28 04:28:11+00:00): Leaving the entire LL Tisdale Parkway as a trunk is like saying "this road is not a freeway because a little segment a long way away isn't." IMO, that's silly.

Look at US 40/189 in Utah, for example. It's built up to full freeway standards (with numbered exits even) until its at-grade intersection with UT 32. Are you saying we should label the entire US 40 freeway as trunk?
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:29:05+00:00): I think if any place would be a good way to split this, the Apache Street junction would be the spot.  Tisdale Parkway was also built aspirationally, and doesn't carry much traffic (usually on par with North Peoria or Gilcrease Museum Road).

Generally speaking, though, once you get past the last junction with another major (like, gets-a-state-or-higher route relation level or meets a motorway) route, the whole feel of the highway significantly changes.  Having driven Tisdale, this tends to occur at the northwest corner of the Inner Dispersal Loop.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:32:25+00:00): I'd split US 40/189 between motorway and trunk at UT 319, trunk south of that junction.
baveggies9999 (2018-11-28 04:40:22+00:00): Mr. Johnson, 

This is the most outrageous and inaccurate misapplication of the trunk designation I have seen in my entire adult life. I would please point you to the Washington State Route 509 freeway in Tacoma, Washington as an example of why this segment of the Tisdale Parkway should clearly and obviously be designated as a motorway and not as a trunk. 

Good day, sir.
cl94 (2018-11-28 04:42:18+00:00): I agree with Duke87 and us89 here. There is precedent elsewhere in OSM for making the entire thing outside of the intersections a motorway. If anything, the section south of Apache is a full motorway because one can pass through 3+ consecutive interchanges.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:43:34+00:00): I'd have mapped 509 a little more similarly to Gilcrease Expressway over Peoria Avenue, sight unseen, but having driven 509 before, yeah, I'd call that a trunk.  Same with 705 north of 9th Street's ramps.
bugo348 (2018-11-28 04:45:11+00:00): The LL Tisdale Parkway is a full freeway from the Gilcrease Expressway south to the ID. I live close by and I used to drive the length of the Tisdale every day and the road is properly classified as a freeway south of the Gilcrease.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:45:14+00:00): Though an argument could be made that 705 should be a trunk north of 509 given that if you try to drive any of that highway like it's a motorway, you're gonna end up in the harbor.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:45:37+00:00): motorways do not have at-grade intersections, trunks do.
cl94 (2018-11-28 04:46:12+00:00): By your definition of what is and is not a "motorway", would I-184 in Boise, I-115 in Butte, and I-587 in Kingston, NY also be trunk roads? I-587 has no interchanges whatsoever!
baveggies9999 (2018-11-28 04:47:07+00:00): Okay but hold up here - you're saying that all these things should be defined differently than they are right now. Shouldn't OSM be using uniform standards and not just the Mr. Paul Johnson standards?
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 04:54:38+00:00): 184: No, that's motorway.  US 26 past the end of 184?  Trunk.

115: Trunk.

587: Trunk.

Yes, we should be using uniform standards.  Motorways are fully grade seperated and dual carriageway between major junctions.  Trunks may have a mix or terminate at-grade.
Duke87 (2018-11-28 04:56:53+00:00): I'm not sure I follow why the last interchange (where the physical geometry of the road does not change) is a more logical point for the classification change than the first intersection (where the physical geometry of the road absolutely does change).

Nonetheless, a change in designation at the Apache St interchange would still make more sense than labeling the whole thing trunk.
baveggies9999 (2018-11-28 04:57:12+00:00): But hold up, the vast majority of these segments within OSM are already shown as motorways. Is it your assertion that you have the authority to unilaterally make the decision to change all of these? Or is this a broader discussion and the current standard as shown on the actual OSM map should be upheld in the meantime?

The 184-20/26 designation is particularly absurd because there's still one interchange on 20/26 before it becomes a surface freeway and besides the number change you can't tell that anything has happened. Making that delineation there is entirely arbitrary.
cl94 (2018-11-28 04:57:42+00:00): But here's the thing: practice in OSM is to only make something a trunk if there are at-grades between 2 consecutive grade-separated intersections. Of the types of roads we're describing, far more are in OSM as "motorways"  than "trunk". We can't go changing things around just to meet your criteria. Precedence overrules other things.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 05:12:59+00:00): @Duke87: The at grade junction makes it not a motorway.  I would prefer it to be from the last major (like with a numbered route) junction on a consistency basis, as it's not reasonable to expect at-grade cross-traffic on a motorway by definition.  That said, I believe we've come to an overall agreement that Apache is a good place to split.  

@cl94: Sure, if you want to go with NE2's torquing of the motorway and trunk tags that we've spent the last several years trying to clean up.

@baveggies9999: No, I'm saying these weren't classified well to start with, whether they got imported from low quality TIGER data or NE2 smash-tagging the entire continent at once on multiple occasions before we had good tools to monitor for such editing.  Going purely by the precedent set by low quality data and vandalism isn't exactly the best precedent available.
us89 (2018-11-28 15:59:05+00:00): There is an overwhelming precedent to make the motorway/trunk designation switch at the first at-grade intersection. Unless you can prove that NE2 changed every single example where a motorway changes to trunk at the first at-grade, and he was the only editor to ever make a change like that, I just can't bring myself to agree.

The at-grade junction indeed makes it not a motorway. That's why the motorway should end there.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 18:22:47+00:00): That would make it a motorway with an at-grade intersection.  Motorways have NO at-grade intersections.
Duke87 (2018-11-28 19:13:01+00:00): This discussion made me curious, so I started poking around the UK, where OSM's classifications are derived from.

It's not common, but I can find a few locations in the UK (where it is legally defined what segments of road are motorway, unlike in the US) where a motorway ends at an at-grade junction. See M4's west end and M181's north end for examples.

Granted, these are roundabouts, but roundabouts are a type of intersection.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-28 19:31:05+00:00): Given that we do have a distinction between freeways (which are fully controlled, grade seperarated and at least two carriageways) and expressways (which are semi-controlled, dual carriageway and may contain a mix of at-grade and grade-seperated crossings and possibly driveways; or single carriageway and grade separated), does it not make sense to have this same distinction with trunk and motorway?  I'm honestly not sure when this got so muddied so many people are dogpiling on this changeset now.
cl94 (2018-11-29 00:44:01+00:00): As signed, the freeway ("motorway") ends at Gilcrease. Shouldn't signed conditions prevail here? https://binged.it/2BFrEwi
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-29 00:57:59+00:00): No, motorways do not have at grade intersections, nor are they single carriageway.  By the same logic you're suggesting, a lot of single carriageway in California and Washington are motorway because those states call all expressways and freeways as motorway and neither state should have anything tagged as trunk at all.  Good thing we're going with what's on the ground and not what the DOT calls it.
cl94 (2018-11-29 01:08:10+00:00): For starters, freeway != expressway. Both are defined engineering terms. Officially, California calls anything with at-grades an "arterial" and OSM marks them as "trunks". "Trunk" sections end at the last at-grade intersection. This is the standard in New York as well.

But a freeway/motorway can end at an at-grade intersection. There is nothing saying it cannot other than your opinion. By your logic, I-10 and I-40 should have significant sections marked as "trunk" and I-90 should switch to "trunk" west of I-5 in Seattle.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-29 01:12:18+00:00): > There is nothing saying it cannot other than your opinion. 

And established usage before NE2 Smashtagging.

> By your logic, I-10 and I-40 should have significant sections marked as "trunk" 

Selective choice of edge case there.

> and I-90 should switch to "trunk" west of I-5 in Seattle.

motorway_link would make more sense in that case.
cl94 (2018-11-29 01:50:10+00:00): > No, motorways do not have at grade intersections, nor are they single carriageway. By the same logic you're suggesting, a lot of single carriageway in California and Washington are motorway because those states call all expressways and freeways as motorway and neither state should have anything tagged as trunk at all. Good thing we're going with what's on the ground and not what the DOT calls it.

I-93 through Franconia Notch (a super two) is in OSM as a motorway. Ditto the super two section of MA 2 and the UNDIVIDED super-two section of NY 85. So no, motorways do NOT have to be dual carriageways.
us89 (2018-11-29 01:58:47+00:00): >> Good thing we're going with what's on the ground and not what the DOT calls it.

The sign on the ground says "freeway ends ahead". And in fact, the OSM definition of  "motorway" is even broader than what a freeway is in the US. There is no road in the US called a "freeway" that is not also a motorway. The Tisdale is a freeway (and therefore a motorway) up to the Gilcrease intersection. Since that's an at-grade, the motorway ends there.

There is no difference in the Tisdale immediately north vs. immediately south of the Apache St interchange. If I get on the Tisdale heading south from 36th St, the Apache interchange means nothing to me. The jump in road quality (and speed limit, for that matter) happens immediately after the Gilcrease intersection, so that's where the classification change should be.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-29 02:15:50+00:00): > I-93 through Franconia Notch (a super two) is in OSM as a motorway. Ditto the super two section of MA 2 and the UNDIVIDED super-two section of NY 85. So no, motorways do NOT have to be dual carriageways.

I'd say those are tagged incorrectly.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-29 02:16:16+00:00): > There is no difference in the Tisdale immediately north vs. immediately south of the Apache St interchange. If I get on the Tisdale heading south from 36th St, the Apache interchange means nothing to me. The jump in road quality (and speed limit, for that matter) happens immediately after the Gilcrease intersection, so that's where the classification change should be.

I disagree.  Freeways (motorways) do not have at grade intersections.  Trunks are very nearly freeways in that they can.