piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-03-20 20:07:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mariotomo (2021-03-20 18:45:38+00:00): quick review link valid until 2021 April 20: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz.php?c=101411022
village (2021-03-22 01:08:54+00:00): so umfangreiche Änderungen, die nach 4 Wochen wieder rückgängig gemacht werden müssen, lohnen sich nicht, ich revertiere deshalb diesen und den Änderungssatz  101454204.

Bei länger andauernden Bauarbeiten ist das evtl. etwas anderes, aber trotzdem auch zu überlegen..

Sorry für die viele Arbeit, aber dabei ging auch einiges kaputt:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/SN/DE-SN-MDV-Analysis.diff.html#A4.1

(zuerst hatte ich angefangen, das zu reparieren, aber sah dann, dass dies zu viel Arbeit hin & in 4 Wochen zurück machen wird)
village (2021-03-22 01:25:59+00:00): bzw. (das bleibt) https://web.archive.org/web/20210322010438/https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/SN/DE-SN-MDV-Analysis.diff.html
village (2021-03-22 01:43:53+00:00): gut: du hast mit 2 Änderungssätzen genau ein Thema bearbeitet, das half bei der Schadensbegrenzung.

Aber der Browser-Editor "iD" hat dir (uns allen) dabei die Reihenfolge der Elemente durcheinandergewirbelt. 

Ich denke, große (oder viele betroffene) public_transport- Relationen sollte man nur mit JOSM bearbeiten. Kleinere kann iD vielleicht auch, auf jeden Fall Vespucci in der aktuellen Version.
village (2021-03-23 23:37:35+00:00): wenn du sehen willst, was mit iD passiert ist, hier am Beispiel Tram16:
Gehe zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1216282/history, rolle nach unten bis zur Version #68 (das ist der Stand nach deiner Änderung)
und unter der Metadatendabelle kannst du die "Mitglieder" (members) der Relation in ihrer tatsächlichen Reihenfolge anzeigen lassen: Da folgt auf "Wilhelm-Liebknecht-Platz" "Roßplatz". Und die Haltestellen des Umleitungsweges sind am Ende angehängt.

Wenn iD soetwas beim Editieren nicht anzeigt, ist er als Editor für ÖPNV Linien-Relationen eben ungeeignet.
village (2021-04-03 23:07:55+00:00): PS: iD zeigt die Relationselemente und ihre Reihenfolge an, ich habe jedoch keine Hilfestellung bei Sortieren gesehen.
charl3s (2022-01-07 22:55:43+00:00): Usuwaj construction=*, bo to blokuje nawiagcje.  Sporo tego zostawiłeś. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eUD
d3mol3k (2022-01-08 13:16:47+00:00): construction=* nie ja pozostawiałem - pozostawił to ktoś kto otwierał tę drogę.
charl3s (2022-01-08 13:42:32+00:00): Ok, dzięki. Jak byś wiedział takie przypadki to możesz usuwać
d3mol3k (2022-01-08 17:43:17+00:00): Staram się ;)
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 18:57:53+00:00): The changes in here are as follows:
1) Delete http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=8436241545 .  That node was tagged as highway=cycleway and leisure=park, but neither of those make sense as nodes.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 18:59:37+00:00): 2) Remove access=private from http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=919249493 .  That was clearly added to make the route un-navigable, but doesn't make sense in the context of the rest of it.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 19:02:01+00:00): 3) Change bicycle=no to designated on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=864727644 (note that this key describes legal access rights, not "how is it is to cycle").  Also removed access=no.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 19:04:29+00:00): Clearly there are other issues.  The photo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919249493 cannot possibly be correct as the path topology does not match.  It has also been alleged that the photo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864727644 is actually not of the trail, but a few meters to one side.
AndyB_66 (2021-03-20 19:14:03+00:00): Dzięki :)
Dawid2849 (2021-03-20 19:36:23+00:00): Nie ma problemu ;)
eggie (2021-03-20 21:16:53+00:00): Oke track lijkt me meer gepast hier.
Ik heb de overbodige accesstags verwijderd en tracktype=grade1 toegevoegd.
Dat is de tagging voor asfalt.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype

MVG
eggie
mariotomo (2021-03-20 19:37:14+00:00): thank you Trevor.  the mistake corrected here is that there is no "corregimiento Colón", but two corregimientos: Barrio Norte & Barrio Sur, and they are already correctly mapped.
Meersbrook (2021-04-15 12:24:17+00:00): Ne remplace pas les commerces carthographiés en zone par des nodes.
Khomille (2021-05-06 15:24:45+00:00): Bonjour :)
Eh bien, si, car les commerces en question ne prennent pas toute la surface de la parcelle ni même du bâtiment (il y a des habitations au 1e étage).
Cordialement
Meersbrook (2021-05-06 15:35:55+00:00): Bonjour,
landuse=retail n'est pas pour des parcelles dont l'activité est commerciale exclusivement.
Tu peux te renseigner sur le site OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail
Une activité mixte; résidentielle et commerciale dans une zone à vocation commerciale, comme le centre-ville se doit d'être taggé comme soit.
user_2066394 (2021-03-21 21:50:35+00:00): razerd:power=*
APneunzehn74 (2021-03-21 21:59:50+00:00): Die Masten wurden komplett entfernt. Gibt's einen anderen tag dafür?
user_2066394 (2021-03-21 22:09:23+00:00): razed:* vs. razerd:*

:-) war nur ein Hinweis
user_5359 (2021-03-21 06:15:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
ToniE (2021-03-21 12:07:02+00:00): Servus mario_du

Respekt!

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/SN/DE-SN-VMS-Analysis.diff.html#bus_E-3

32 bzw. 22 Lücken aus dem Bus entfernt - und das mit iD, dem viele nachsagen, das man damit Relationen nicht gescheit editieren kann.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
Allison P (2021-03-20 19:55:44+00:00): It does not seem responsible of your teacher to make you add information (especially false info) to OSM. I have reverted this changeset. I'm willing to explain to your teacher the issues with such an assignment if you'd like.
gscscnd (2021-03-21 08:17:58+00:00): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101429381> — zamieniłem name:left z name:right, żeby pasowało do kierunku drogi (na OSM biegnie z północy na południe). Zamieniłem też kolejność w name.
gscscnd (2021-03-21 08:19:10+00:00): Ciekawe czy mrówki takie tagowanie obsługują.
Jan'ek (2021-03-21 15:14:43+00:00): No, nie zwróciłem na to uwagi. Rozpatrywałem to jako kierunek południe - północ (intuicyjnie do ekranu). A co do obsługi mrówek, niewiele wiem.
Glassman (2021-03-21 20:35:14+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting an object just fix the tags and geometry which will save the history of an object. Since you added the feature it's not a big deal. Just wanted you to be aware we do keep the history of an object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101415854
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 20:29:16+00:00): Pogresno mjesto zaobilaznice
MTB FORIS (2021-03-20 20:42:41+00:00): The photos were taken on the stretch from Kadino brdo to the asphalt exit in Petruše. A video showing the mud, which you posted on Google Maps, shows a person riding a bicycle passing right into the mud next to a sign that points nicely to the right to the detour.
user_10654882 (2021-03-21 09:44:20+00:00): We are still waiting for a photo with EXIF data, I am also looking for a valid gps recording of the new route. I also take a photo of the sign indicating the bypass with valid EXIF data. I believe you are mapping from your office and have not been to the location.
user_10654882 (2021-03-21 18:44:07+00:00): I checked my gps records, this workaround was completely wrongly drawn by the MTB FORIS user. Even the sign on the drawn route is out of place.
I find that the MTB FORIS user is constantly working against the OSM community.
!bm (2021-03-20 20:45:56+00:00): Hallo

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

War bereits vorhanden, daher Änderungen hier zurückgesetzt und bestehenden Eintrag korrigiert/aktualisiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101417391

--besteGrüße!bm
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 20:40:14+00:00): da privatna zemlja je u pitanju. Vlasnik je clan MTB Evolution :)

yes it is a private country. The owner is a member of MTB Evolution team  :)
MTB FORIS (2021-03-20 20:53:27+00:00): We no longer want to waste time on these correspondence. We have more important things to do, and then we do them, we put them on Openstreatmap. So don’t bother in vain and you’re wasting your time. There are a lot of owners here in this part and everything is private land, so don’t waste your time.
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 21:01:01+00:00): ;) ima administrator da odluci. A vrijeme gubite vi jer jam vec snimam Mapillary sve staze i puteve.
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 21:10:45+00:00): mozete pogledati na ovom videu kakva je staza napravljenja nasim radimo na nasoj privatnoj zemlji 
Youtube link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY-J09Dta2s
G_P_J (2021-03-21 17:36:57+00:00): W tym adresie brakuje miejscowości:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561270930
Cristoffs (2021-03-21 20:58:09+00:00): Zmieniałem tylko geometrie budynku ;-)
G_P_J (2021-03-21 21:07:20+00:00): No cóż, trzeba zwracać uwagę na szczególiki :)
user_5359 (2021-03-21 05:34:16+00:00): Hello! You add some verify unusual tags to way. Please check https://www.osm.org/way/919844655, https://www.osm.org/way/919844654
loveshack (2021-03-21 11:05:14+00:00): Thanks.  I thought I'd fixed all the errors importing definitive lines which JOSM didn't warn about.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-20 21:33:42+00:00): Masz może szanse i ochotę zrobić zdjęcie tego miejsca i zgodzić się na publikację na otwartej licencji?

Od jakiegoś czasu poluję na ilustracje do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:left https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:right

Najlepsze byłoby coś co w jednym kadrze pokazuje obie nazwy i pokazuje że każda stosuje się do jednej strony drogi

(wystarczy że gdzieś wrzucisz zdjęcie, zostawisz tu link, potwierdzisz że jesteś autorem i że zgadzasz się np na zasady https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl )


(lub na CC0 które pozwala na wykorzystanie bez ograniczeń)
Jan'ek (2021-03-21 16:12:47+00:00): Nie wiem kiedy, ale spróbuję podjechać i zobaczyć to miejsce jak jest opisane, oznakowane (są tam dwie takie drogi, podwójna nazwa). Mam po drodze do rodziny, to kiedyś to sprawdzę. Sam jestem ciekaw.
Jan'ek (2021-04-11 18:34:58+00:00): Niestety, tabliczek z podwójną nazwą drogi nie ma, choć dwie nazwy funkcjonują - potwierdzone przez mieszkańców.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-11 20:22:38+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za sprawdzenie! To będę szukał dalej.
gscscnd (2021-06-03 10:23:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105769241
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#105769241
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-01 20:16:06+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919849222 and other
tomhukins (2021-05-05 19:04:41+00:00): You've added a new peak here but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/448899243 already exists.

These two nodes need combining: the other one is in the correct place for the trig point so it's probably worth deleting the new one you added and improving the tags on the existing node.
tomhukins (2022-01-29 17:43:27+00:00): I've left a follow-up comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116631600 which moved this node.
Douglal (2022-01-31 11:05:06+00:00): Hi, the OS map shows the trig pillar at 322m and the summit at 323m approx 25m south east of the trig pillar. So the peak that I added should be kept as a separate node. Thanks.
OrDal (2021-03-21 09:45:11+00:00): Hi,
What is the source of the Kheerab (ruins) you added to the map? most of them do not have trace on ground.
sszv (2021-03-21 13:35:05+00:00): Hi, I have three sources that there are visible ruins:

(1) https://www.academia.edu/30540421/McKinny_C._2016_Dissertation_-_A_Historical_Geography_of_the_Administrative_Division_of_Judah_Bar_Ilan_University (page 268) says: "a large (55x100m) casemate fortress from the Iron II (no sub-periods given, but presumably IIB-C) was partially excavated at the site along with a small nearby settlement (Baruch 1997b; Weiss et al. 2004:site 3/241; Greenberg and Keinan 2009:site 4179)."

(2) https://amudanan.co.il/w/P535478 describes the site and has a close-up photo (via Google Translate): "A large fortress from the Israeli period - the Iron Age. Instead of arches and remains of walls that have been preserved to a height of up to a meter and a half, over a very large area. On the southeast side of the fort there are the remains of an entrance gate east of the main street of the compound."

(3) https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=208780.21,622306.95&z=11&b=17&lang=en shows the outline of the excavated section (a "rectangular fort excavated... [with] a large central courtyard surrounded by rooms," according to https://books.google.com/books/content?id=FE0QAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA150&img=1&pgis=1&dq=%22and+Khirbet+el-Id+near+Wadi+Fukin%22&sig=ACfU3U0pU2ZOBVssje3hB9O1-Ug4iYAlZg&edge=0).

However, I haven't been there in person, so if there aren't actual ruins (or if the outline doesn't match their extent), I'm happy to see changes.
aceman444 (2021-04-02 08:56:52+00:00): Hi, you say to convert to consulate=honorary_consul (correct), but actually do consulate=honorary_consulate (incorrect). Please pay attention to such typos and introducing unnecessary new values.
eggie (2021-03-20 21:02:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-20 21:10:35+00:00): Dag CycleHJ

Geldt dit wellicht ook vanaf het stuk beginnend bij de Watermolenstraat?
Volgens mij is daar  zelfs een klaphek en een verbod om een hond mee te nemen. 
MVG
eggie
CycleHJ (2021-03-21 08:34:39+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Ik heb de aanname gedaan dat het hele stuk was geselecteerd, maar zie nu hoe de kaarten zijn opgebouwd. Mijn fout, weer iets geleerd ;-)

Helemaal correct dat het ook geldt voor de ingang Watermolenstraat. Ik heb gelijk een nieuwe wijziging voor ook dat deel gedaan. Ook daar staat een bordje  verboden voor fietsers.

Mvg HJ
eggie (2021-03-21 08:38:59+00:00): Top!
hatul (2021-07-27 13:04:11+00:00): הכניסה לחורבת נר חסומה?
Zarmi (2021-07-27 13:30:37+00:00): כן.
כשהייתי שם במאי, שער הכניסה היה נעול, עם שלט שאוסר להיכנס
hatul (2021-07-27 13:36:12+00:00): ממש חסום פיזית?
Zarmi (2021-07-27 13:39:58+00:00): כן.
מניח שאפשר לעקוף את זה דרך החומה, אבל אסור 🤷‍♂️
hatul (2021-07-27 13:41:55+00:00): טוב, חבל.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-20 21:21:55+00:00): Hai sbagliato! Quello va inserito nel tag operator il nome è piattaforma parisi ed il gestore e HHLA
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101418143
sabas88 (2021-03-20 21:30:58+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, Parisi è socio di minoranza. Il nome potrebbe anche essere "Piattaforma Logistica di Trieste", ma nella stampa specializzata è chiamato HHLA PLT Italy (vedi https://www.themeditelegraph.com/it/2021/03/19/news/trieste-prima-nave-nel-terminal-hhla-1.40046877).
A tutti i terminal italiani ho dato il nome della società concessionaria perché effettivamente è una ripartizione di un'area più estesa (il demanio portuale) data in gestione 
a privati.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-20 22:09:32+00:00): ok, però io escluderei l'area tra la nuova piattaforma e Piazzale Legnami che anche quella fa parte dello scalo legnami
sabas88 (2021-03-21 11:01:26+00:00): Il terminal scalo legnami è stato incorporato http://faqts.blogspot.com/2019/09/ship2shore-al-via-la-fusione-tra-scalo.html

Se guardi la piantina sul sito del terminal mi sembra copra entrambe le aree...

Se vuoi modificare fai pure, sei tu quello con la "local knowledge" :-)
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-21 12:09:51+00:00): ok, ho letto e va bene così
tux67 (2021-06-23 10:49:26+00:00): Hi - der Node wurde gerade von einem Neuuser gelöscht - würdest du mal schauen und ggf. kommentieren?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106796698
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101418173
aweech (2021-03-20 21:31:15+00:00): Hi,
As you're doing MapRoulette challenges, it's wise to pay attention to what you are doing. This reservoir was very clearly drained years ago, and so should have been tagged as natural=wetland. Also, its name is Ice Pond, not "California Brook Pond".
MxxCon (2021-03-21 05:16:15+00:00): Hello.
I noticed you've been adding and updating business related info around NJ. 👍 When it comes to phone numbers, please try to format them as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage
dieterdreist (2021-03-31 11:35:09+00:00): Hi Pedro, I have seen you have moved the Rome node to piazza Navone. From my point of view, this is quite a bold move, relocating the place=city node of a major city with a millenial tradition without engaging with the local community first. I would be interesting in learning about the motives, and would also like to point you to this user diary which deals with the question of determining the centre of Rome: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/40727
Cheers,
Martin
literan (2021-04-01 07:37:13+00:00): вы этой правкой сломали несколько мультиполигонов (жилая зона, территория дороги). Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее (или, если не хочется быть аккуратным, пишите в заметках, что надо исправить).
syntex (2021-11-10 23:02:59+00:00): Adres tego budynku przedszkola to 5/7, nie 5
mueschel (2021-03-23 14:03:00+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags - what does 'service:bicycle:pai' mean?
Felipe Alves (2021-03-23 14:41:36+00:00): Thanks for the warning. Just a typo, last word should be parts. I don't know why I didn't see warnings before, but it's corrected.
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
G_P_J (2021-03-21 17:35:15+00:00): W tym adresie brakuje miejscowości:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919820462
Sigridstorrada (2021-03-21 18:29:33+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę i przepraszam za przeoczenie. Już poprawione. Pozdrawiam serdecznie
G_P_J (2021-03-21 20:39:38+00:00): Super, dzięki. :)
lyctkel (2022-06-18 20:22:59+00:00): Hi EdHillsman,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919869061 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919869062 which uses building=residentialqIvan Aguirre.
This tag is only used here and looks like a typo to me. I have no idea what you meant, otherwise I would have corrected it already.
Can you tell me what you meant here?
Regrads,
lyctkel
WebFreak (2022-03-25 22:55:00+00:00): in diesem Changeset wurden landuse=retail areas teilweise mit Informationen über einzelne Shops/Buildings ergänzt, z.B. beim IKEA in die landuse=retail area opening_hours, etc. eingefügt, was laut Wiki nicht gemacht werden sollte.

Ich passe gerade die areas aus dem changeset an, sodass die ganzen informativen tags auf den Gebäuden und nicht auf der landuse=retail area liegen.

Siehe "How to map" auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail
mappinglander (2021-03-21 14:53:39+00:00): Merhabalar,
Yaptığınız düzenlemenin gözden geçirilmesini istediğiniz için düzenlemeye baktım ve size geri bildirim vermek istedim.
Düzenleme iyi gözüküyor. Eğer isterseniz building:material=adobe etiketini ekleyerek binanın kerpiçten yapıldığını belirtebilirsiniz.
Meersbrook (2021-04-15 12:29:44+00:00): Ne supprime pas la zone de centre-ville commerciale. Si elle est mixe, landuse=residential n'est pas à utiliser, mais landuse=retail.
landuse=retail n'implique pas un usage unique mais une information supplémentaire maintenant absente.
Khomille (2021-05-06 15:38:51+00:00): Bonjour :)
Ces rues sont constituées d'immeubles d'habitation. Certains immeubles hébergent au rez-de-chaussée des commerces. Il s'agit donc d'un quartier majoritairement résidentiel.
Cordialement
Meersbrook (2021-05-06 16:05:58+00:00): Bonjour, le centre-ville à vocation commerciale. Résidents ou pas, la vocation de quartier n'est pas résidentielle. landuse=retail n'implique pas un usage unique mais une information supplémentaire absente si tes contributions n'avaient pas été corrigées. OSM a pour but d'être riche d'information. Pas à outrance mais assez pour avoir un message à transmettre.
G_P_J (2021-03-21 17:33:02+00:00): W tym adresie brakuje miejscowości: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170635646
syntex (2021-11-11 23:01:05+00:00): Czemu zmieniasz ciągi pieszo-rowerowe z highway=path na highway=footway? to duży błąd
SLMapper (2023-06-17 19:44:02+00:00): Hi @AlkalIn,
from 2017 aerial imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12471192 seems not to be only farmland, but most of if actually forest.
AlkalIn (2023-10-18 13:55:54+00:00): Hi SLMapper,

Thanks for the comment!
This area needs to be more accurately digitized indeed. But I can tell it is mostly farmlands for the following reasons: (1) I have been there to survey and this is a mixture of pure farmlands, oilplam plantations (which should be tagged as orchad and tree=oil palm), and forests converted to agroforest with little trees (not trees with canopy touching each other as in most definitions of forest). (3) According to the tree height calculated in Potapov et al, 2020, Global Forest Canopy Height 2019, this area consists mainly of very short vegetation (crops and shrubs).

This is shifting agriculture so it is sometimes hard to distinguish on high res imagery between forest and the regrowth of small shrubs that happens during the fallow stage between two successive plantation of crops. 

But for sure more details can be added as they are still some very small patch of forests inside the farmlands, visible in popatov dataset. These should be digitized.
SLMapper (2023-10-18 17:49:00+00:00): Thank you AlkalIn for this very informative answer. Good to have you in the openstreetmap community :-)
AlkalIn (2023-10-20 11:54:55+00:00): Thank you SLMapper!
JoeG (2021-03-24 07:30:59+00:00): Hi, this deletes a "wood" of deciduous trees that is not yet visible in Jan 2020 imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914301288
I'd like to re-add it. Do you think it makes more sense to add tree rows or individual trees instead? The trees are obviously not mature yet, so they're not going to feel like a wood for many years.
mario7436 (2021-03-28 01:59:12+00:00): Individual trees are fine, just more work. It can be difficult to separate the trees from the forest when the trees form a canopy. Rows of trees are common along fences, roads and paths in cities.
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-13 13:09:28+00:00): "transport" landuses might have been non-canonical, but after this changeset they are broken: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101420511