piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ikanian (2020-09-04 15:57:09+00:00): En principio debería de estar ya resuelto. 

Puede parecer que sigue habiendo muchas calles que se llaman igual, pero esto es correcto (Calahorra, Villajimena, Ezcaray, notablemente).
Cartographer10 (2020-12-06 15:29:40+00:00): Hallo BushBeast,

Een amenity=parking zoals je hier meerdere langsparkeervakken hebt getekend is niet wenselijk. Amenity=parking is meer voor de grotere parkeerplaatsen. Voor dergelijke langsparkeervakken wordt parking:lane:right=parallel or perpendicular gebruikt. Een deel zal ik al aanpassen bij mijn edit hier
Paul Berry (2022-04-20 23:43:19+00:00): It's actually rather easy to "do islands" in the iD editor: simply select the lake and the island then select Merge and it will create a multipolygon with the correct roles (inner and outer).

I have done this for you on changeset #119975917.
XnL (2020-08-28 09:05:57+00:00): АЗС Роснефть теперь здесь нет?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90035193
Speed100011 (2020-08-28 13:12:13+00:00): Нет
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90035193
XnL (2020-08-28 14:33:56+00:00): Заменил уже существующую АЗС Роснефть в следующем пакете правок: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90087301
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90035193
Martin Borsje (2020-08-27 16:16:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-27 16:17:53+00:00): Hallo: je hebt iets fout gedaan, je hebt een groot building gecreëerd dat er niet is; alsmede heb de de volledige naam op het sportcentrum en de individuele velden gezet.
Ik zal een en ander herstellen.
Martin
20180911 (2021-02-20 15:59:43+00:00): hat der Tag wikidata=4 an Weg 841397279 etwas zu bedeuten? Wenn nicht, sollte er gelöscht werden.
wellasus (2020-09-03 07:19:39+00:00): This is the correct comment for this changeset,
Added service road #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
Hiddenhausener (2020-08-27 15:48:53+00:00): Soll nur neues Gebäude heißen.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 12:29:39+00:00): Hello LHQUAN,
Please don't make political edits like this. The way that OpenStreetMap handles political disputes is described at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . If you believe that the current mapping is incorrect please contact OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org .
Also, please don't the same changeset description for every changeset.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 12:30:15+00:00): Xin chào LHQUAN,
Vui lòng không thực hiện các chỉnh sửa chính trị như thế này. Cách OpenStreetMap xử lý các tranh chấp chính trị được mô tả tại https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Nếu bạn cho rằng ánh xạ hiện tại không chính xác, vui lòng liên hệ với Nhóm công tác dữ liệu của OSM tại data@osmfoundation.org.
Ngoài ra, vui lòng không mô tả bộ thay đổi giống nhau cho mọi bộ thay đổi.
Trân trọng,
Andy Townsend, đại diện cho Nhóm công tác dữ liệu của OSM.
stefanct (2021-05-27 23:28:04+00:00): Regarding the Habersaualm drinking_water point of sale. It depends a bit on the exact circumstances. If it is drinking water only that is sold then a simple fee=yes is enough. In the case of a hut that also sells some snacks but there is no sleeping accommodation, i.e. a tiny form of restaurant, there is no really fitting tag imho, maybe the best would be amenity=restaurant then. AFAICT this is not the case here.

Either you meant a form of vending machine or if there is a shop keeper then this is actually a shop (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeverages) and I presume this fits your description best. In any case, I tried my best to interpret your data and you can see the result on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119104053 since it does not make too much sense on a single node and could easily be misleading.

Please check and comment.
indianajoe (2020-10-13 22:42:54+00:00): Mistake. Undone in 92427939.
karson_ (2020-08-27 19:24:44+00:00): That's a bit of an odd setup. I'm curious whether the city built the pool before the schools, or the school district built the schools around the pool?
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-01 17:21:36+00:00): Jei service=driveway netinkama klasifikacija, tai reikia įvesti kitą - tinkamesnę. Jei tinkamesnės nėra, tada tegul lieka driveway :-)
user_5359 (2020-08-27 19:01:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
wellasus (2020-09-03 07:54:10+00:00): This is the correct comment for this changeset.
Added service road#MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
DUGA (2024-06-21 19:37:28+00:00): The "brilliant" idea of adding a no U turn has been deleted, it makes no sense.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11551710/history#map=19/39.57454/-76.42364
Frans S (2020-08-31 12:16:39+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping work lacks accuracy and details.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
ndm (2020-08-28 19:53:14+00:00): There's no signed restriction here -- should probably be removed.
Anton Markau (2020-08-28 20:22:25+00:00): Somehow I didn't notice that the traffic lanes are separated not by a solid line, but by a broken line and mistakenly assumed that the u-turn is prohibited there. You're right, thanks for noticing this. Removing this restriction now.
djakk (2020-08-29 20:36:05+00:00): Salut ! Tu t'es trompé, c'est D175 et pas D41 qui est le vieux nom ;-)
djakk (2020-08-29 20:38:36+00:00): *D173 ; exemple : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.950983053413665&lng=-1.4878079357429215&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=mTcC7xjN1nLLd2mMYRqj8Q
djakk (2020-08-29 20:43:06+00:00): Je me permet de retirer source:ref qui doit être un attribut du changeset et non pas un attribut de la route (c'est une méta-information) ;-)
Kalaallit Nunaat (2020-08-31 14:29:41+00:00): Salut, ok pas de soucis.
Cascafico (2020-08-28 06:49:50+00:00): Se non appiccichi i poligoni alle strade fai un favore a moltio mappatori.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90037669
Rainero (2020-08-30 16:26:15+00:00): Hallo Nicor,
hat Streetcomplete hier einen Fehler oder hast du dich vertan?
Bei den Gebäuden steht jetzt in addr:street die Hausnummer, aber die gibt's in addr:housenumber ja schon.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Nicor (2020-08-30 20:20:27+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

das ist merkwürdig. Ich kann nicht mehr nachvollziehen, ob der Fehler bei StreetComplete lag oder ich eine Abfrage falsch beantwortet habe, werde aber das nächste Mal darauf achten. Ich habe jetzt die fälschlicherweise eingetragenen Nummern zunächst nur entfernt und hoffe dabei nichts falsch gemacht zu haben.

Viele Grüße, Nicor
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-20 06:04:45+00:00): Hi  Petrocore. Your edit looks awesome, but the tag building:yes  due crossing with waterbody(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/841411170). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143788752). Thank you.
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 12:56:31+00:00): all bing bird's eye sourced objects have been deleted
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 13:11:30+00:00): bing bird's eye is a banned source here due to not having the license to use it as a source, so i have deleted everything that used it
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-28 11:47:27+00:00): Hi morheg, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Your changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=90038060

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
morheg (2020-08-28 17:58:28+00:00): Hello plitscheplatsch,

thank you very much for your comment! For the oil tanks it seemed most practical to set up one with the right dimensions and attributes and replace the old ones. I will not do that any more in the future, thank you again for the helpful comment!
user_5359 (2020-08-27 18:57:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have your entry of building:levels with the value 345, I assume maximal 2 levels there (based on Bing).
Glassman (2020-08-29 18:03:11+00:00): Tip: you can square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - I went ahead and squared it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90038857
Frans S (2020-08-29 12:24:47+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are not that accurate as we might expect. 
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
BCNorwich (2020-08-28 07:06:09+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your data and updating are valuable but some of it is inadvertently duplicating existing data/features. I've removed some duplicate POI and data, updated data on area outlines as per OSM practice. I placed the camp site entrance on the highway.

Your three Bird Sactuary POI's don't really make sense from an OSM data view. The walkway is not on a walking way nor looks like a viewpoint, (just the side of a road). The Bird Sanctuary Parking free node is not tagged as parking nor does it look like a viewpoint. I can't figure out what you might mean here so I can't help with amendments on these features.

Regards Bernard.
pinkki (2020-08-27 18:10:43+00:00): ...or tried adding, still doesn't show up as one
Martin Borsje (2020-08-27 18:31:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
opendcc (2021-02-21 18:23:06+00:00): Hallo,

stimmt das Radwegende in Soyen?
Acid941 (2021-02-21 18:36:15+00:00): Grias di, 
ich habe den Radweg am Luftbild ausgerichtet. Da hast du recht. Das Ende war nicht richtig. Das Luftbild hat wie immer recht. Viele Grüße
Jakka (2020-08-27 18:33:45+00:00): done
hhcfw (2021-08-30 13:32:49+00:00): Do NOT change geographic names that are not accurate; "Prestile" River does not exist on the Canadian side of the border. The river is named "Big Presque Isle River". Verify with NRCAN before modifying names: http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique/DAQLF.
literan (2020-08-30 20:30:42+00:00): два wildberries в 100 метрах друг от друга? не ошиблись? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6111603919/history
neo-plan (2020-08-31 06:36:23+00:00): Нет, Wildberries в доме 17к1. Точки ставил навигатором, в пешем режиме. На всякий случай, проверил по их сайту - всё так. Перенёс точку магазина из 15к1, как имеющую больше тегов. Добавил тег веб-сайта Wildberries..
gscholz (2020-08-28 07:15:49+00:00): Hi sobaba,
this changeset has falsely effected the RPS309, resulting in a self intersecting line:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.29127&lat=-30.92831&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90042612

Can you please fix this?
Guido
sobaba (2020-08-28 12:27:35+00:00): me parece que está fuera del cuadrante. pero más tarde lo corrijo...
kidonsky (2020-08-29 07:53:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas ton changeset. Tu retire les adresses de certains batiments ? Pourquoi ?
Et quel est le rapport avec la "Loi relative aux données personnelles" ?

Merci de ta réponse
kidonsky (2020-09-09 20:24:48+00:00): Bonjour à nouveau,
Peux-tu m'aider à comprendre ?
TravGW (2020-08-27 19:59:39+00:00): Why change the house to an industrial building and why add a park which does not exist? Also is the "industrial" building really used by the 7th Day Adventist? Looks like you are creating fantasy edits for some unknown reason. Please don't. The map is not a game. It is a real world map which many people and organizations rely on. Please do not add fantasy/fake edits.
Simone Saviolo (2020-08-27 20:05:06+00:00): Perché stai togliendo le fermate di Movilinea? Perché Osmose le segnala?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90043199
Jrachi (2020-08-27 20:30:23+00:00): Ne ho toccato un paio.
L'errore segnalato lo vedi alla pagina:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Simone%20Saviolo?level=1
Conflict between tags: aerialway, highway, railway
Perchè hai inserito cose come aerialways=no; highway=no; railway=no
Che non hanno nessun significato se è una fermata bus....
Se pensi che sia un errore di Osmose dimmelo che apro un ticket.
Simone Saviolo (2020-08-27 20:54:25+00:00): Le ho fatte tipo sei anni fa e non ci metto la mano sul fuoco, ma credo di aver seguito il preset di JOSM. Concordo che non servono quei tag, ma le fermate ci sono e andrebbero ripristinate.
Jrachi (2020-08-27 21:15:10+00:00): Ho ricontrollato.
Nessun nodo cancellato.
Ho modificato i nodi:
2620793735 (su questo avevo tolto il bus=yes ma l'ho rimesso)
2620793732 ho rimesso il tag bus=yes ma essendo una piattaforma il tag non è applicabile secondo la pagina:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:public_transport=platform

Scusa ma perché te la prendi tanto?
Se trovo errori commessi 6 anni fa da un utente che ha fatto 9 changeset nell'ultimo anno li correggo (si dovrei prima mandare un messaggio)
Allora ti sei guardato la pagina di Osmose che ti ho segnalato? Sono circa 200 problemi di questo tipo. Di livello 1 cioè gravi, e non sono ereditati ma li hai creati tu....

Ciao e buone mappature!
Simone Saviolo (2020-08-27 22:41:26+00:00): Ripartiamo dall'inizio. Mi sono messo ad osservare i changeset in zona, e ho notato delle cancellazioni da parte tua. Quindi ti ho contattato per chiederti il perché delle cancellazioni. Mi accorgo adesso che i nodi delle fermate del bus non sono stati cancellati: COLPA MIA, avevo capito male il rapporto di OSMCha. 

Non è che me la prendo: il fatto che i dati che modifichi li avessi messi io è una coincidenza, dovuta al fatto che a Vercelli due terzi di ciò che c'è l'avevo fatto io. Che siano dati di 6 anni fa non ha nessuna rilevanza, visto che corrispondono ancora oggi alla realtà. Che abbiano dei tag di troppo è un errore e va corretto, hai ragione, grazie per averlo fatto. Ad ogni modo, Osmose non è la Bibbia, e i dati che segnala vanno analizzati e verificati, non ranzati e basta perché lo dice Osmose. Per esempio, in questo caso non vedo cosa ci sia in conflitto nell'indicare che è una fermata dell'autobus, una stop position del trasporto pubblico, ma non ci si fermi né la metro né la linea aere. Comunque, questa modifica è corretta, e considero chiusa la questione.
Glassman (2020-08-29 17:57:14+00:00): In OSM access=private typically means the street has no trespassing signs. When the street sign says private it means that the road is maintained by other than the city or county. Very confusing. Because it is a dead end, routers only need to know if they can route to a home along this road. By adding restrictions, you may be preventing giving driving directions to the homes.

Also - unclassified doesn't mean it has no classification, we use it to mean a residential road typically found in rural areas. Since this road is allows public access to the home along it, I would suggest making it highway=residential. 

BTW - OSM was started in England. We use british english tags. unclassified is a british type of highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90043713
aixbrick (2020-08-28 08:30:07+00:00): Hallo,
die "Überarbeitung" verstehe ich nicht. Ich habe vor Jahren die Radwege der Realität angepasst und nur dort separat gemappt, wo sie baulich getrennt von der Straße laufen. Was war denn daran falsch?
Gruß
Parzelle13 (2020-08-28 09:07:51+00:00): Ich bin gestern vom "Schwarzer Weg" in Richtung "Krefelder Straße" dort gefahren.  Der Fuß- Radweg auf der nördlichen Seite war durchgehend entlang der Straße mal direkt dran oder mit etwas Abstand zur Straße und mit DE:240 beschildert. Warum muss man bei einem durchgehenden Wege- Straßenabschnitt zwei verschieden Mappingweisen anwenden. Das macht es ja nicht gerade übersichtlicher, vor allem an den Kreuzungen. Man muss den Fuß- Radweg ja nicht verlassen um z.B. auf einem Schutzstreifen auf der Straße weiter zu fahren. Ist ja vielleicht nur meine persönliche Meinung dazu.
Parzelle13 (2020-08-28 09:14:33+00:00): Habe nochmal im Wiki nachgesehen. Danach ist ein Bordstein auch eine bauliche Trennung. Und dieser war dort durchgehend vorhanden.
Parzelle13 (2020-08-28 09:47:58+00:00): PS: Ich möchte jetzt keinen Streit darüber ausbrechen lassen. Ich kann das gerne revertieren.
aixbrick (2020-08-28 10:44:09+00:00): >> Warum muss man bei einem durchgehenden Wege- Straßenabschnitt zwei verschieden Mappingweisen anwenden.
Weil es der Realität entspricht. Wenn ein Radweg nur kurz direkt an der Straße vorbeiläuft und sonst baulich getrennt, dann ziehe ich den natürlich auch in diesem Bereich als eigenen Weg durch. Aber wenn es mehrere hundert Meter sind, dann sollte das auch so in OSM abgebildet werden, da sonst eine wichtige Information verloren geht: "Ich kann hier (theoretisch) jederzeit die Straße queren".
>> Danach ist ein Bordstein auch eine bauliche Trennung.
Bitte nicht dieses Fass aufmachen :-). Für mich ist ein Bordstein keine bauliche Trennung.
>> Ich kann das gerne revertieren. 
Musst du wissen. Näher an der Realität war es m.M.n. vorher, wenn auch bestimmt nicht überall optimal gemappt.
Parzelle13 (2020-08-28 11:38:09+00:00): So, ist zurückgesetzt.
aixbrick (2020-08-28 13:38:46+00:00): Danke
Frans S (2020-09-05 07:45:45+00:00): 
Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping are rather inaccurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-09-05 08:07:22+00:00): This is a task which is not suitable for beginner mappers. Please select another easier task to map,
complex buildings are more a job for experienced mappers.


iD Editor: Be aware that iD editor hides OSM features from view to enhance performance. There is a blue notice that appears at the bottom of iD Editor indicating whether OSM features are being hidden. Zoom in until no features are hidden before editing. This will ensure you are not duplicating existing mapping which you have done.
Cartographer10 (2020-12-06 15:23:03+00:00): Hallo BushBeast,

Je had de landuse=forest van het eiland gehaald en er een place=* opgezet. Place=* is voor het taggen van plaatsen. Landuse=forest was correct hier. Ik heb het terug aangepast.

Vincent
Leo Slager (2020-08-27 22:13:26+00:00): Dag joeyweij,
OpenStreetMap hanteert voor een park een definitie die op het Engels is gebaseerd.
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc.  Dat is dus iets heel anders als een klein parkje in het NL spraakgebruik.
Een park is een soort transparante deken over al de andere landuse heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
 Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
SHARCRASH (2020-08-27 20:52:31+00:00): + new elements
marc__marc (2021-03-16 16:21:43+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841495247
c'est toujours en construction ? leur site web dit qu'ils ont ouvert à la rentrée 2019 (donc j'imagine septembre 2019) mais j'ignore si c'est à cet endroit.
Cordialement,
Marc
VoyOptimist (2021-04-21 15:41:01+00:00): Bonjour, oui, le chantier a pris pas mal de retard... Depuis l'extérieur, l'ensemble du site n'est pas encore entièrement fini. Peut-être que l'accueil des élèves se fait sur un autre site ou sur une partie achevée du chantier, je n'en sais pas plus...

Bonne journée,
marc__marc (2021-04-21 22:39:58+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour votre retour et les améliorations.
j'ai changer description en website pour l'url de l'établisement.
j'ai aussi ajouté que c'était la construction d'une école.
n'hésitez pas à vérifier si vous le souhaitez.
Cordialement,
Marc
frosm (2020-08-28 20:22:48+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez-vous mettre un commentaire de modification qui décrit votre modification au lieu de "+ belle la vie" ?
j'ai un peu du mal à deviner votre intention. l'office du tourisme est ouvert dans un batiment en construction et qui a 0 niveau ? cela n'a pas de sens
Frans S (2020-09-05 10:26:10+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping are not that accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them.
Please do not collect multiple buildings and map thema as 1 building. 

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-09-05 10:32:00+00:00): Please take a look to this page where you can see your original mappings and how they should be.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90448235
AntMadeira (2020-08-29 01:40:26+00:00): Olá, Ricardo.
Vi que alteraste a estrada EN 358 de secundária para primária.
Antes de alterares hierarquias, aconselho-te a consultares esta página:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o

Como podes ler aí, estradas nacionais desclassificadas passam a secundárias, que é o caso da EN 358, que foi desclassificada.
Se não houver nenhum outro motivo de maior, peço-te que corrijas essa alteração.

Cumprimentos,
António.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90046999
trigpoint (2020-08-28 14:11:56+00:00): Again the mast and the building are two separate objects.

How did you find this as its a bit out of the way?

Cheers Phil
Peter Leese (2020-08-28 14:30:32+00:00): using cellmapper and going for a drive highlight ed there was a O2 mast so i then used a satellite view to find it
Kovoschiz (2020-08-28 05:53:36+00:00): You can play with map data and render them on your own, but please don't upload. This is vandalism.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90047183
trigpoint (2020-08-28 14:08:14+00:00): Hi, this edit is not quite correct.

The mast hould not a building object, the site has a building and a mast. These should be mapped as separate objects.

Cheers Phil
Peter Leese (2020-08-28 19:30:10+00:00): Yea true I'll fix it to be two items
eggie (2020-08-28 07:39:01+00:00): Dag Walter.. Goed bedoeld, maar dit soort toevoegen zijn niet nodig en zijn gewoon default.
Het ligt niet in de getijdengebied aan zee. 
MVG,
Eggie
Frans S (2020-10-10 14:49:43+00:00): Hello Hope7804
from the 308 objects your mapped here are 301 not fair and square mapped.
Please improve your mapping skills!