piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2020-10-18 15:06:26+00:00): Faktycznie, polski artykuł na wiki jest dość ubogi; a punkt "Dostęp" jest niejednoznaczny (przydałyby się tam jakieś przykłady...).

Na szczęście, wersja angielska jest już znacznie obszerniejsza i porusza dokładnie tą tematykę: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets#Gender_neutral_toilets

Wprawdzie, jest tam wspomniane, że „As of April 2018, the meaning of unisex=yes is unclear, with 3 incompatible tagging schemes in use.”, to mam wrażenie, że w Polsce, w większości jest już stosowany jeden schemat tagowania.
Jest nim: „unisex=yes always means a gender neutral toilet, gender segregated toilets should be tagged unisex=no+female=yes+male=yes. male=yes+female=yes cannot be replaced with unisex=yes” - z tym, że u nas nie jest konieczny tag unisex=no.
Użycie tagu unisex=yes w Polsce możesz zobaczyć tutaj: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Z8P - jak widać, bardzo często są to ToiToi'e :)

Co ciekawe, edytor iD domyślnie nie pozwala zaznaczyć razem tagów male i female... (mimo, że zakłada to jeden z 3 równorzędnie używanych schematów tagowania podanych na wiki) Nie dziwię się więc, że sporo userów (szczególnie tych początkujących) jest „zmuszonych” do użycia tagu unisex=yes. Na szczęście tagi female=yes+male=yes można dodać ręcznie :)
mavl (2020-10-20 16:33:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:33:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:48:06+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Basstoelpel (2020-10-17 17:59:23+00:00): Hallo Delta Electrified,

ein herzliches Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Kannst Du bitte in Zukunft angeben, was Du geändert hast? Ich kann Dir versichern, das hilft einem später auch selbst, wenn man nachvollziehen muß, was man vor Monaten einmal geändert hat.

Nebenbei: die Luftbilder von Bing sind weder die aktuellsten noch die schärfsten oder lagegenauesten. 

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
mavl (2020-10-20 16:32:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:32:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
hackthemap (2021-07-21 13:16:14+00:00): Hi :)
Warum ist hier crossing=no ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8016881989/history#map=15/50.1101/8.7364&layers=N
Später hast du auch tactile paving mit StreetComplete hinzugefügt, war crossing=no evtl ein versehen?
Wenn nicht dann müsste mindestens highway=crossing wieder weg, weiß auch nicht welche Bedeuting das tactile paving dann hätte?
Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8016881989/history#map=15/50.1101/8.7364&layers=N
Grüße
hackthemap
mavl (2020-10-20 16:32:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:32:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:31:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
user_5359 (2020-10-20 15:43:36+00:00): Hello! You don't add no keys to the most ways. Please check also http://www.osm.org/way/860161986: What ist the meaning of helping=volunteer?

Did you need any help?
user_5359 (2020-10-20 15:45:08+00:00): also http://www.osm.org/way/860161987: What ist the meaning of Helping=volunteer? 

Please notice Helping isn't the same key like helping.
adiatmad (2020-10-23 07:46:03+00:00): Hello kaithlynn tat!
Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them. Also please avoid double mapping at same objects, it will causes overlapping building.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing)

I'm wondering if any internal validator from your team.

Best regards and happy mapping!
mavl (2020-10-20 16:31:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
ChrissW-R1 (2021-09-20 14:03:19+00:00): Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2452089
mariotomo (2022-09-11 17:44:48+00:00): te traduzco el comentario anterior?
no se entiende qué quiere decir la etiqueta 'name:' al lado de 'name', con valor diferente.
Lyon-St-Clair (2020-11-08 15:06:44+00:00): Officially named N 13B, it's the same situation for the N 31B. Luxembourgish administration is a bit messy about some roads.
Lyon-St-Clair (2020-11-08 15:07:43+00:00): I think it's a good compromise to use "trunk" for this situation instead of "Primary road".
Lyon-St-Clair (2020-11-08 15:11:01+00:00): And for conclude, they have a road signe "Route pour véhicules automoteurs", like the french "route pour automobiles", but it's very rare.
wilda69 (2020-11-08 15:22:07+00:00): Thanks for the info. It really just not make sense for them to call it N13B which means you can cycle upto where it becomes a motorway. On the official 1:20 000 R10 Luxembourg (Schengen-Weiler) map that stretch is clearly shown as a motorwaylink to the roundabout. I dont think we should change that for the sake of a inconsistent numbering. Maybe quote the ref is "N13B"
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:47:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92637511
mavl (2020-10-20 16:31:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:31:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:30:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:30:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:30:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:30:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
DaveF (2020-10-18 15:32:02+00:00): Hi
access by foot is designated, It's designation is permissive.
DaveF (2020-10-18 15:42:56+00:00): Motor vehicle access is implied on highway=service roads
eggie (2020-10-17 18:19:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip  Je kunt ook Actueel_ortho25_WMS  op de achtergrond zetten. Deze is actueler. 
MVG,
Eggie
blackboxlogic (2020-10-17 23:57:55+00:00): FYI https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour
philipmolloy (2020-10-18 00:32:41+00:00): Ah cool! Should I remove the color from the name (and especially in this case where I didn't create the name)? I'm going to be up in Rumford tomorrow so will be able to check it out in person.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-18 13:45:40+00:00): If people refer to it that way, or those words are printed on a reference (example "The White House") then that's a name. If something is a color, or has blazes if a color, or you think it would be better rendered as that color, then use the colour tag. Those are not mutually exclusive.
mavl (2020-10-20 16:29:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:47:32+00:00): source: bustimes.org
eggie (2020-10-17 18:59:54+00:00): Dag steenarthur.. Goed gezien.

Het is volgens mij een verplicht fietspad.
Daar horen de volgende tags bij.
mofa=yes 
moped=no
traffic_sign=NL:G11

Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

MVG,
eggie
steenarthur (2020-10-17 19:54:22+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Ik heb het verkeersbord toegevoegd
eggie (2020-10-17 20:34:57+00:00): Mooi.. wat wel belangrijk is dat je ook toevoegt
moped=no
mofa=yes
Dan rendert het anders op bv de openfietsmap.
NL:G12a paden met moped=desinated renderen als een dikkere lijn en routeren anders.
Gr
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-18 10:10:38+00:00): De rest van de G11 tags heb ik nog even toegevoegd.
MVG,
eggie
steenarthur (2020-10-19 07:16:20+00:00): Dank je wel!
Groetjes, Arthur
BCNorwich (2020-10-18 07:06:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area's you've drawn, Way: Waterworks (413142201), Way: Waterworks (308627227), Way: Waterworks (306774401) these are not waterworks it's a man_made=wastewater_plant. It's also incorrect to use a description as a name. Names must be formal and verifiable to all. There seem to be several instances of these problems.

Your area Way: 860178626 is not a man_made=wastewater it's an area of three agricultural reservoirs.

The areas you've amended, Way: 365506071, Way: 365506070 tagged are drawn over several differing land features and tagged as fixme. If you can't fix them please don't try to fix them. The original mapper has drawn hundreds of areas like this, they all could do with fixing properly.

I notice your large areas tagged landuse=farmland (like Way: 860178639), actually encompass areas that are comprised of many different landuses, some drawn and tagged as various types of farmland. Way: 860178639 (landuse=farmland) has inside it woods, buildings, orchards and ponds.

Way: 860178636, a large area covering differing types of landuse is untagged.

Could you have a look at these anomalies please, Regards Bernard.
Broken Hill (2020-10-20 19:34:14+00:00): Hi Bernard,

I'm very sorry for my errors and will fix them now.
The description "Water Works" didn't came from me; but from this gentleman https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Johnmb/history
Because of the existing descriptions I wasn't sure whether these are sewage plants or treat potable water; but now as you say that they are sewage plants I feel reassured.

In my opinion large areas containing dozens of different landuses tagged as landuse=farmland are very unreasonable. Actually I was trying to split them up; the gentleman who keeps mapping this way is called "Essex Boy" https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Essex_Boy/history

Kind regards,
Peter
BCNorwich (2020-11-30 15:14:02+00:00): I've been through these changes and fixed the problems I can see.
Jakka (2020-10-18 07:27:11+00:00): op de sum_buster tag vehicle=no (alle voertuigen niet maar behalve ... wel) en al wat wel door over kan toevoegen met yes
user_5359 (2022-04-12 15:02:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531815500/history. What is the meaning of the tag religion=นศ.4104 ?
Bernhard Hiller (2022-04-12 16:59:39+00:00): Good finding, thanks! It should be "ref" instead of "religion", of course.
user_5359 (2022-04-12 17:03:10+00:00): Done!
eggie (2020-10-17 19:01:53+00:00): Top!
mdelatorre (2020-10-18 15:17:56+00:00): Thank you for adding information to OSM.
I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

Hi, Where did you get the name of the link (source). Usually road links don't have a particular name. If the name is "44A" please change it to "name=Calle 44A". Saludos.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92639513
Linkid (2021-01-14 09:17:13+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous n'avez certainement pas fait exprès, mais vous aviez par retiré un trajet de la ligne de bus 12 par inadvertance. Je viens de le détecter via Osmose et je l'ai corrigé ;).
François
Verdy_p (2021-01-14 13:27:12+00:00): C'est possible sans doute parce qu'il était posé sur un chemin qui n'a rien à voir avec les transports ou routes; ici je n'ai touché que des relations de type landuse. et comme l'indique les attributs ci-desus, c'était déjà des corrections Osmose pour des intersections incorrectes voirie/eau ou des voiries *déjà* déconnectées du reste.
Osmose à ce moment-là (il y a plus de 3 mois...) n'a rien signalé d'autre.
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 19:04:38+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92639687
santamariense (2020-10-20 01:00:51+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Fique a vontade para perguntar sobre qualquer dúvida que tenhas.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92639883
santamariense (2020-10-20 01:12:43+00:00): Talvez você vai gostar do F4 maps que mostra as geometrias do mapa OSM em 3D.
São Pedro do Sul em 3D: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-29.6281814&lon=-54.1817965&zoom=16
building:levels=1 parece ser mais adequado.
Bons mapeamentos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92640232
aceman444 (2020-11-29 22:51:16+00:00): Zdravim, hodnota 'permit' neexistuje, pretoze je pokryta hodnotou 'private', ako to predtym bolo spravne. Prosim vratte to spat a menej experimentov prosim, nie je vsetko zle. Uz som Vas na to upozornil v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91861747 ale nereagovali ste.
aceman444 (2021-04-05 14:14:52+00:00): Ok, zda sa, ze hodnota 'permit' sa postupne rozmaha, aj ked nikdy nebola schvalena a nie je jasny jej vyklad. Preto stale nie je vhodne jej pouzivanie.
nathelbiya (2020-10-18 18:07:49+00:00): Die Haltestellenschilder wurden kürzlich verschoben. Ich weiß nicht, wie ich die Stops verschieben soll und will nichts kaputt machen.
Marmo4D (2020-10-18 20:08:13+00:00): Ah ok, d.h. die Haltestellenschilder / platforms sind an der richtigen Position und da wo die sind halten auch die Busse? Wenn du das bestätigst, verschiebe ich die stop_positions.
Gruß, Marmo4D
nathelbiya (2020-10-18 20:56:49+00:00): Genau, die Schilder habe ich dahin verschoben wo sie in der Realität sind und die Busse in der Richtung halten.
Danke für's fixen,
  nathelbiya
xronos (2020-10-28 00:22:06+00:00): вы заметили что автобусные маршруты потеряли связанность?
xronos (2020-10-25 20:48:53+00:00): я заметил были удалены некоторые теги:
например
class:bicycle:mtb
class:bicycle
smoothness
они чем-то не нравятся? чем?
а также пострадали некоторые relations. Это случайность или намеренные действия?
xronos (2020-10-28 19:31:50+00:00): maxspeed=RU:urban на всех дорогах -- это очень неаккуратный подход. Там знаки стоят - ограничение где 40, а где 5
mdelatorre (2020-10-18 15:13:21+00:00): Thank you for adding information to OSM.
I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

The tag kreatus don't exist in OpenStreetMap. Please erase your changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92640845
aceman444 (2020-11-20 02:16:56+00:00): Zdravim, ten usek mimo obce by som dal highway=unclassified (nie je to ulica v obci, takze residential je divne).

A zrusil som ten pozostatok cesty 3406. 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=94468011

Dakujem
mapko (2020-11-20 08:36:29+00:00): OK. Dakujem.
ja19d (2020-10-17 20:36:01+00:00): 1 hour of time 10/17/2020
imagoiq (2021-07-01 13:53:17+00:00): Hello Marius,

It seems to be a mistake, do you confirm ?

Best regards
IlBano (2020-10-17 21:05:35+00:00): Descrizione changeset errata. Quella corretta è: Sistemazione geometria highway e rimozione landuse non più presenti
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-17 21:24:34+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 83936383, 84010494, 84070762.
sorcrosc (2020-10-17 22:43:08+00:00): State your sources for these entries please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92642423
syntex (2020-10-18 16:35:05+00:00): https://ebikexperience.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Mappa-Sentieri-ebikexperience-Repubblica-di-San-Marino.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92642423
syntex (2020-10-18 16:37:25+00:00): And the source of the other hamlets, that I have added in the past is here https://mappeonline.pa.sm/maps/prgmobile/
sorcrosc (2020-10-18 19:16:21+00:00): I'd recommend you to always state your source in the changeset tag as this is important for later users, especially because if I'm right, you are not verifying the data.
Moreover, it seems you are making extensive use of these data and even though licence is not declared by the owner I would consider to make sure copying is allowed. By the way, are you aware of the import guidelines?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
syntex (2020-10-18 20:27:16+00:00): Just to be clear, this was not an import, I added all of them manually. This PRG map is indeed public data, made by the government of San Marino, which can be found here https://www.gov.sm/dip/Ufficio-Tecnico-del-Catasto.html 
I assume, that if there are no restrictions stated in the government website, this data is free to use. It would be strange if the data about the addresses or street names was restricted to reuse, I guess this is also the source that Google copied its database from but anyway. This governmental page also contains other maps that need authorisation to use, so I think that these are the ones, that cannot be copied. So I have not used them.
I've been adding a lot in San Marino for a few months including all addresses, street names, buildings land use and lots of other things and I have never made an import here. The confirmation of existence  of these places is available on both of these maps i linked the source to. I also understand that there are sources with restricted usage policy, such as Google Maps or other data sources, but this is not the case here.
Also the official state tourism website https://www.visitsanmarino.com/en/ uses the openstreetmap to show some tourist attractions so I am sure that they are aware of the usage of data here and have no objections against it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-05 13:58:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859643754/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
harg (2024-11-05 14:09:08+00:00): A search for the address gives https://jjzfood.co.uk/contacts/ which suggests it's no longer Kem's.

I'll try to check it when I'm next in the area.
BCNorwich (2020-10-18 07:44:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I guess this is a test to see how OSM works. There's no park at this location it's a house. If you were trying to add your house and need help please just ask in the comments here.
I've removed the park POI.
Regards Bernard.
InsertUser (2020-10-18 10:54:39+00:00): I have removed the untagged way that was created from the Pacific over Equador, Colombia and Venezuela to the Atlantic as I presume this was in error.
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:47:08+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Warin61 (2020-10-28 07:29:33+00:00): Hi,

The relation has 2 outer ways that share segments - this is a no no. 

There are two entries for this one feature ... both 'Surface Hill Historic Reserve - one is a simple node... OSM says - one feature = one entry. ??? and the tags don't make much sense to me? 

landuse 	forest - so used to get timber? 
site_type 	mineral_extraction???
and 
Historic Reserve... which matches the Parks Vic as the operator... 
It may have been it the past forestry and/or mining. But tag what it is now. 
So what is it now? 

I'd delete the relation and leave the simple way.
Warin61 (2020-10-28 07:30:29+00:00): Sorry - one is a simple way (not a node).
Warin61 (2020-11-09 08:56:55+00:00): No response. 

Repaired as best I could not knowing the area.
RicoElectrico (2020-11-19 15:09:57+00:00): Cześć, wg tej uwagi i innych w pobliżu budowa wcale się nie zaczęła:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2431789

To powinno być więc co najwyżej highway=proposed.
mike140 (2020-10-18 10:18:49+00:00): Why did you change the fountain to a natural body of water?  This is an artificial reservoir
G1asshouse (2020-10-18 23:15:24+00:00): It was an iD identified issue. The change was given by iD.
mike140 (2020-10-19 03:34:26+00:00): go to Josm )
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92643645
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 03:31:12+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92643790
!bm (2020-10-18 16:57:13+00:00): Hallo iamtheahmed,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! 

Du hast hier den Weg irrtümlicherweise an eine PLZ-Relation gesetzt. (Solche sollte man grundsätzlich nicht anfassen, außer es ist beabsichtigt.) Da ich anhand von Luftbildern nicht erkennen kann, ob dieser am weiter nördlich querenden Weg (bereits auf anderem Flurstück und als privat getaggt) anschließt, endet er nun südlich der PLZ-Relation.

Dies und ein paar andere Sachen korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92663099
– bessere Darstellung der Änderungen siehe: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92663099/

--besteGrüße!bm
saudotb (2020-10-20 11:55:01+00:00): مرحبا اخ سعد 
للتذكير ارجو عدم ازالة " تاق " building لأنه بالفعل يدل على انه مبنى 
عموما استرجعت التعديل الأخير 
فقط للتنبه بذلك وشكراً لك .
سعـد (2020-10-21 19:56:54+00:00): السلام عليكم
الله يعافيك أخوي سعود 
لكن عنذي استفسار بسيط مافيه مجموعات لإضافة المعالم على الخريطه 
ودي انتظم مع مجموعة 
إنا هالحين شغال على معالم المدينة المنورة
saudotb (2020-10-22 11:24:07+00:00): للأسف ما سمعت عن قروبات لرسم السعودية وجميعها اجتهادات فرديه 
نتمنى يكون فيه كذلك
Mordechai23 (2020-10-18 15:27:00+00:00): You seem to have been there recently. Do you recall if this crossing is protected with a refuge island or not?
matthiam (2020-10-22 09:36:43+00:00): Some time ago I checked it.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-19 21:23:05+00:00): Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8017619700 is in the middle of the Atlantic.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2020-10-20 00:36:55+00:00): fixed
Broken Hill (2020-10-18 17:18:42+00:00): Hi houston mapper,
may you please point me to the Wiki page for this import? I can't find it.
--Cheers
Glassman (2020-10-18 05:48:22+00:00): tip: Street names are spelled out in OSM. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix Rocky Peak Place?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92644720