piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2022-05-10 09:54:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check this cycleway with strange dog_park tags?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89149241

Btw: I don't think it's necessary to prefix waste_bin or picnic_table tags with 'dog_park'. It's already clear that they belong to a dog park if they are used on an object with leisure = dog_park.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-05-12 19:12:52+00:00): thank you.
removed bad tags.
eggie (2022-04-15 15:48:06+00:00): Hi Huwii.. 
Welcome to OSM in the Netherlands. 
In OSM Netherlands there is no need to add addresses. Addressnodes are already present.
Where is housenumber 7?
Greetz,
eggie
b-unicycling (2022-08-26 10:58:09+00:00): Sure it's Ordanance Lane rather than Ordenance Lane?
Sanniu (2022-04-17 09:35:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please don't change area of school building - the whole area is the school area, not the single building!
Please revert this to the previous geometry!
abakus_uploader (2022-04-15 22:31:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2022-04-15 18:42:32+00:00): Sorry about the globe-spanning changeset again. Most of the data revwrted here was in Canada and in West Africa, although there is other data elsewhere.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:01:27+00:00): how is using open data not allowed
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:28:11+00:00): unacceptable
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 15:54:13+00:00): None of this was copied from Google or even remotely close to google
Sanniu (2022-04-17 09:49:46+00:00): It is not a memorial, it is building!
You killed the building and pushed memorial instead! Please read OSM wiki!!!
Tzlilrub (2022-04-17 16:37:34+00:00): This is not a regular building, it is a memorial for IDF soldiers and a cultural center for the local community.
Sanniu (2022-04-18 04:11:56+00:00): Hi, I'm also local and I know what this site is. You mix between building proposal and proper tagging. First thing it is a building that has proper geometry (as a building), height, etc. Second - it is a memorial site, so appropriate tagging should be added either to the building or to the surrounding area, or to the point near the building. You removed building tagging and extended area to the whole site, that was not right.
user_15227900 (2022-04-18 07:42:15+00:00): Hey, danke für's bearbeiten des Entenhauses, ich wusste nicht wie ich die Form am besten hinbekomme. Das Haus an sich ist eigentlich ein Octagon https://i.pinimg.com/originals/21/63/cb/2163cb0635a8230235692ac130620b21.jpg , die Insel ist ein Quadrat
SekeRob (2022-04-15 21:20:21+00:00): Hi,

You made 7 water areas inner to the wrong Bare Rock zone. Duly Corrected.

Ciao

PS When you select an are to connect the relation to, here just start typing Bare. It will list 2 BR relation. The one that shows the grey outside the water is the right one. If you pick the wrong one the water edge takes on a greyish teint in edit mode, in this case. Would you have done it in forest, you'd see trees growing from the lake.
See CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119766002 for correction.

ciao
astraspera (2022-04-17 13:57:33+00:00): Thank you as always for fixing my issues. I'm trying to understand how to avoid them in a future
wambag (2022-04-15 16:08:17+00:00): Declassified from tertiary to residential. Mainly, it is not a connector for 1A South and Revere Beach Parkway, those movements are handled by direct ramps and MA 16. No signage directs drivers to use this road as a connector. Also, dense housing, narrow ROW, street parking on both sides and residential speed limits. Not tertiary.
PT-53 (2022-05-01 09:52:04+00:00): Hallo donovaly,
Du hast diese 3 Straßenabschnitte
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43846716/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052086083/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151791353/history
auf highway=construction
gesetzt und damit in OSM voll gesperrt.

Wie lange soll die Sperrung voraussichtlich andauern und wo gibt es Infos dazu?

Fragende Grüßé

PS:
Gefunden mit broutersuspects:
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=19/7.85367/48.01373&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
donovaly (2022-05-01 21:12:47+00:00): > Wie lange soll die Sperrung voraussichtlich andauern

Bis September. In Freiburg dauert es selten so wie angekündigt. Ich trage es daher so nach, wie ich es vor Ort vorfinde.
Wenn du mehr zur Baustelle sehen willst, schau hier: https://www.freiburg.de/pb/1085138.html
PT-53 (2022-05-02 06:34:58+00:00): Hallo donovaly, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung und eine Bitte:
Gib doch künftig bei solschen gravierenden Änderungen jeweils die Info-Quelle und die voraussichtliche Sperren-Dauer an.

Grüße
donovaly (2022-05-06 23:19:49+00:00): > Gib doch künftig bei solschen gravierenden Änderungen jeweils die Info-Quelle

Warum? Ich kartiere, was ich sehe. Wenn ich eine Änderung sehe, trage ich es ein. Was interessiert die Bauplanung, wenn eine Straße noch nicht oder vielleicht immer noch aufgerissen ist?
Wir sollten uns mehr vertrauen.
PT-53 (2022-05-07 06:01:43+00:00): Hallo donovaly, 
kennst Du das QS-Tool broutersuspects ?
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59957
- http://brouter.de/brouter/suspect_manager_help.html
- http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=8/9.12501/48.15124&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json

Ich schaue mir jeweils Sonntags auf der Karte die neuen Hinweise für BW an und versuche zu klären ob da Baustellen vorhanden sind oder vielleicht nur ein Fehler vorliegt. 
Bei einer Baustelle "verstecke" ich dann den Hinweis für die voraussichtliche Dauer der Baustellen-Sperrung.

Wenn bei einer Baustelle vom Mapper jeweils auch ein Hinweis auf die voraussichtliche Dauer im CS oder als Note am Highway hinterlegt würde, hätte ich weniger arbeit und andere Mapper würde das ja vielleicht auch interessieren.

Nicht jeder, der Baustellen einträgt, überwacht diese auch laufend und löscht dann die Sperrungen wieder. Durch die Hinweise aus broutersuspects habe ich auch schon vereinzelt Baustellen gefunden, die schon längst erledigt waren, der eintragende Mapper sich darum aber nicht mehr kümmerte.

Überwachst Du diese Baustelle zeitnah und wie lange soll ich den Hinweis in broutersuspects beim nächsten Auftauchen dann wieder "verstecken"?

Grüße
donovaly (2022-05-12 00:30:29+00:00): > Nicht jeder, der Baustellen einträgt, überwacht diese auch laufend und löscht dann die Sperrungen wieder.

Wir haben da wohl andere Herangehensweisen.
Also erst einmal finde ich es nicht gut, dass du anderen nicht vertraust.

Wenn ich irgendwo unterwegs bin, uns sehe, dass eine Straße länger nicht befahrbar sein wird, ändere ich sie auf Baustelle. Wenn sie wieder frei ist, wird sie jemand anderes wieder auf befahrbar setzen. Das ist für mich der Sinn des Mappens - "was zählt ist auf der Straße".

Wie du siehst, habe ich eben auch in Israel und Albanien gemappt, weil ich da auf Reisen war. Ich werde sicher nicht Zeit damit verbringen, im Netz zu suchen, wie die Baustelle heißt. Das ist ja auch irrelevant.

Zu dieser Änderung: diese ist in Freiburg, du kannst sicher sein, dass wenn die Straße wieder befahrbar ist, dies jemand innert wenigen Tagen einträgt. Wie gesagt, die Zeitangaben auf Webseiten sind geduldig, nicht selten dauert es Wochen oder gar Monate länger. Ein auf befahrbar setzen ohne vor Ort zu sein, geht daher nicht.
PT-53 (2022-05-13 06:23:09+00:00): Ich habe Dir nicht mißtraut oder gezweifelt, daß dort eine Baustellen-Sperrung ist. Mit ging es darum wielange die Sperrung voraussichtlich andauern und ich den Hinweis aus broutersuspects entsprechend "verbergen" soll. Es bringt ja nichts, wenn der Hinweis in broutersuspects während der ganzen Sperr-Zeit offen bleibt.
donovaly (2022-05-16 00:56:41+00:00): > Es bringt ja nichts, wenn der Hinweis in broutersuspects während der ganzen Sperr-Zeit offen bleibt

Ist doch egal. Wichtig ist die Realität und nicht den Skripten genüge zu tun. Zumal es zig Tools gibt, also Mapper kann man die nicht alle kennen.
Und wie gesagt, die Angaben auf Verwaltungswebseiten sind geduldig, mehrere Monate Verspätung sind keine Seltenheit. Einige Sperrungen werden in anderen Städten und Ländern im Vorfeld auch nicht angekündigt.
NieWnen (2022-04-15 16:25:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2940878
martien-176 (2022-05-14 16:25:56+00:00): Hi, doing sanity checking project 12433 i noticed you mapped a building with layer=1.

Only in exceptional cases a layer tag is added to a building. And this is not such a case. 

Please take care of this notice in future mappings. 

Thanks and please keep mapping. Kind regards from Martien, global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119757505
Strubbl (2022-04-20 16:29:31+00:00): Den ehemaligen Sundflor habe ich auch wiederhergestellt und auf disused gesetzt.
V-Li (2022-04-16 22:35:00+00:00): Du hast einige sich überlappende Gebäude erzeugt:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&level=2&tags=&fixable=&bbox=8.9325714%2C49.8814732%2C9.205513%2C50.0694808&zoom=18&lat=49.946418&lon=8.946738

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&level=2&tags=&fixable=&bbox=8.9325714%2C49.8814732%2C9.205513%2C50.0694808&zoom=18&lat=49.946635&lon=8.947075&issue_uuid=3e92f311-5b1c-659e-7075-f9cd6fbd7cb7
Geofreund1 (2022-04-17 06:58:10+00:00): ist behoben
aTarom (2022-05-29 14:21:49+00:00): Hola, podrías especificar el origen del nombre de las sendas y pistas que estás editando? Bin Laden, Trampolín, Gandul, Cantamañanas... el campo name suele reservarse para los nombres oficiales, puedes leer más sobre el tema en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Ya me dirás.
Carnildo (2022-04-15 19:00:05+00:00): Did you do any conflation before running this import?  The very first thing I checked, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9668520092, had already been mapped two months earlier.  The second, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9668520090, had been mapped five years earlier.

I also find it unusual that both of them were tagged as "slaughterhouses": as far as I know, neither one kills animals.  They both take already-processed carcasses and turn them into individual cuts of meat.
zluuzki (2022-04-15 19:50:19+00:00): Yes, i did. However, i didn't know about shop=butcher, so i didn't search for it. But did it now and removed 95 duplicated features.
On the second example; I wouldn't be able to find it anyway, since it's not tagged with man_made=works, industrial=slaughterhause, or anything at all except name.

Industrial=slaughterhouse: They were listed with the "North American Industry Classification Code" "Poultry Slaughtering, Dressing, and Packing". However, there was a more detailed "processing only"-tag in the orginal data - and i didn't realize it either. But i fixed this too, 700 slaughterhouses remain.
impiaaa (2022-04-15 19:57:03+00:00): Please follow the import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
In particular:
- Document the import
- Link the documentation in the changeset comment
- Notify the imports mailing list
- Wait for a week for feedback from the local community
- Do not damage the live database
In addition, this changeset violates general guidelines around changeset size.
impiaaa (2022-04-15 20:29:15+00:00): In addition to the duplicate data (which is against the "Don't put data on top of data" import guideline), the "phone" and "description" tags are not properly formatted. Because of these issues, it's clear that the data did not go through manual review before uploading. That may be allowed after agreement from the community, but clearly that agreement was not reached either. Manual review after uploading is not acceptable, since it adds bad data to the live database.
impiaaa (2022-04-15 20:34:05+00:00): Reverted in changeset 119765007
Frans S (2022-05-09 08:59:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You squared hardly buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119757851
ivanbranco (2022-04-15 17:14:55+00:00): Ciao iabbok, benvenut* su OSM :)

Ho un dubbio, hai cambiato Centro Ceramiche ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1650264743 ) da un negozio di arredamento bagni a un'architetto, ma sul sito web c'è scritto chiaramente si tratta di uno show room e magazzino, come mai questa modifica?

Qua ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9668549130 ) hai aggiunto Informagiovani col nome tutto in maiuscolo e con addr:street=Via Fratelli Laviny 67. Su OSM mettiamo il numero civico in un tag a parte, quindi addr:street=Via Fratelli Laviny+addr:housenumber=67

Se hai dubbi e domande chiedi pure, buon mapping!
iabbok (2022-04-15 17:27:58+00:00): Sistemato Informagiovani e numero, giusto!
eggie (2022-04-15 17:59:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Zelf ben ik niet zo'n wiki aanvuller, maar volgens mij is het correct.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Eiim (2022-04-15 18:40:50+00:00): Correction: the user who let me know about this is ptreidy, not ptriedy
Pikse (2022-05-20 10:47:33+00:00): Juhin veelkord tähelepanu: teed ja vooluveekogu (sh truubiks märgitud jõelõiku) ei tuleks kunagi omavahel ühendada, sest need ristuvad eri tasanditel[1]. Viimastel kuudel oled selle vastu eksinud veel mitmes muudatuses. Ainsaks erandiks, kus sobib tee ja jõgi ühendada, on ristumine punktis, mis on märgitud koolmekohaks (ford=yes).

Näiteks neil joontel ei tohi olla ühist sõlme:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231995525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313821292

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
Pikse (2022-08-30 11:50:30+00:00): Veel infoks, vastavad vead, mida olen jõudumööda parandanud, leiab siit: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?country=estonia&item=1250&class=2
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-13 19:35:29+00:00): @Pikse, you're doing good job by fixing these errors, but it doesn't look like @Aulo reads these messages. Don't know how tedious your fixes are, but maybe try private messages? There is also an option to report to an admin and they have tools to make someone read a message without assigning guilt or banning.
bxl-forever (2022-04-16 15:06:39+00:00): Hello,

Do not forget to update the highway type too (highway=living_street).
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-17 09:56:24+00:00): Thanks bxl. And, added a bench. :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119810161
gudensberger (2022-07-25 12:58:05+00:00): Hallo,
du hast bei der Gänsefeldstraße einige Hausnummern scheinbar auf Basis von BING korrigiert, ist das so korrekt oder warst du vor Ort? Lt. ALKIS waren sie vorher richtig.

LG
Rene (2022-07-30 12:04:51+00:00): Ich war vor Ort. Eigentlich müsste es stimmen.
Lg
Famlam (2022-04-15 21:26:05+00:00): Oeps, dat was de vorige... Ik bedoelde natuurlijk "wegen toegevoegd n.a.v. notes; vijver toegevoegd"
VerticiesBird (2022-04-17 06:48:36+00:00): Please ensure that the location of the node for the business is placed accurately. Organic Maps should make it easy to place the node on top of already mapped buildings. I've fixed this one, but please be mindful in the future.
Jordan Mann (2022-04-18 19:40:31+00:00): Hey Sander, I see you never responded to my question about this subject in response to a comment that you made on one of my changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119400817), and instead have just reverted the changes. I would appreciate if you could explain why we shouldn't use separate paths for footways so I have a better understanding of the rationale behind this decision.
sander79 (2022-04-19 07:13:18+00:00): Sorry, I thought I already replied. The (unwritten) rule is that everything that is not specifically separated from each other is combined with each other.
Also, based on routableness, it is better to use sidewalk, it is almost impossible to make good routable for pedestrians if everything is drawn separately. For example, a pedestrian can just cross the road, now you must first walk out of the street and hopefully that has been signed as a crossing.
balint36 (2022-04-15 18:28:23+00:00): Szia! Salgótarján külső állomásra miért rajzoltál be meglévő vágányok, peronok és épületek mellé extrában még egyet?
balint36 (2022-04-15 18:35:17+00:00): Pontosabban nem csak Salgótarján külsőn. A 81-es vonal állomásain a nem átmenő fővágányok, a mellékvágányok, épületek és kerítések duplikálva lettek, pedig az eredeti példányok címkéi jobban ki voltak töltve.
eggie (2022-04-15 18:31:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Meestal hebben dit soort speelplaatsjes geen officiële naam. In dat geval beter de naam verwijderen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-15 18:46:19+00:00): De naam heb ik even verwijderd...
Laat maar weten of het de officiele naam is. Het park heeft al een naam als zodanig.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-04-15 18:36:16+00:00): In my opinion and according the aerial imagery Esri world was the former spot okay..
This is not the correct place.
What is your source in this matter.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-04-15 18:43:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #119761948
due not using aerial imagery and replacing pylon..
ivanbranco (2022-04-16 18:17:41+00:00): Ciao dirarch, benvenuto su OSM :)

su OSM si usa per convenzione l'inglese britannico, quindi surface=sterrato non va bene, puoi vedere una lista di possibili valori qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface

Inoltre non è necessario aggiungere foot=yes and bicycle=yes alle highway=track in quanto questi valori sono già impliciti, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy

Buon mapping :)
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 19:48:50+00:00): https://data.winnipeg.ca/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
CorruptComputer (2022-04-21 22:03:39+00:00): Why did you create way/1052114245 here? 

This is already in a river, you don't need to add another river area here.

Removed in changeset/120021642
francians (2022-04-16 06:35:53+00:00): Ciao,

essendo "Lago delle Rane" usato dalle persone del luogo, l'ho spostato in loc_name.
Vedi:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants

Buon mapping
Francesco
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-15 18:46:21+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, what licence is "Statistics Canada Road Network File (RNF)" made available under and where can we see that?
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:03:38+00:00): Road Network
Select Organization: Statistics Canada
Search for: National Road Network
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:03:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources/Local_data
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:04:20+00:00): Geographic files and documentation: 92-500-X

Description:
The Road Network File (RNF) is a digital representation of Canada's national road network, containing information such as street names, types, directions and address ranges. The information comes from the National Geographic Database (NGD).

Frequency: Annual
Available formats: HTML
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:04:37+00:00): Reference
Geographic files and documentation: Road Network File, Reference Guide
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:05:37+00:00): According to the Canada Open Government website, open data is defined as structured data that is machine-readable, freely shared, used and built on without restrictions.

Smart cities and governments are increasingly making use of data when looking to implement problem-solving measures to provide efficient and effective services to constituents. Open data invites innovation, not only through government channels, but also through grassroots organizations, individuals, and businesses. The benefit of open data is that any user can access and make use of it freely. Individuals, formal and informal organizations, or enterprises can use the data and other information to research and innovate on any number of topics.

Statistics Canada has recently embarked upon an exploratory initiative which aims to enhance the use and harmonization of open building data from government sources, for the purpose of contributing to the creation of a complete, comprehensive and open database of buildings in Canada. The outcome of this exploratory work led to the creation of the Open Database of Building (ODB), a centralized and harmonized repository of building data made available under the Open Government Licence - Canada.

This initiative originates from insights taken from the Statistics Canada pilot project on data crowdsourcing, which used OpenStreetMap as a platform for integrating data on building footprints. In addition to the possible benefits of crowdsourcing, the project highlighted the potential of integrating open data from municipal, regional, and provincial governments to meet the needs of official statistics.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:06:11+00:00): Open Government Licence - Canada
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 19:08:20+00:00): Canadian Open Government Licence has been approved as compatible with ODbL by the Licence Working Group (LWG).
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:03:07+00:00): he different products offered under prior licences (GeoBase, CanVec, GeoGratis, Statistic Canada, …) are now available under the new licence. All available products can be obtained from the Open Government Portal. Numerous datasets are available but searching for them is very messy. The location of these products (http ...) changes regularly. Therefore, the portal is still the best place to go. Search parameters to use in their Portalare identified below for some interesting datasets.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:04:07+00:00): Open Government Portal
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:04:26+00:00): The open data portal catalogue is a downloadable dataset containing some key metadata for the general datasets available on the Government of Canada's Open Data portal.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:05:20+00:00): You are free to:

Copy, modify, publish, translate, adapt, distribute or otherwise use the Information in any medium, mode or format for any lawful purpose from this license.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 22:11:46+00:00): This is the source i used for most roads in canada, and you reverted them. SomeoneElse please stop reverting my edits in Canada.