piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
highflyer74 (2018-01-26 06:05:18+00:00): Moin!

Ich habe mich mal um die Öffnungszeiten gekümmert :-)

Michael hatte Dir ja im vorherigen Changeset schon ein paar Tipps gegeben, ich hänge Dir hier nochmal ein paar Links dran, damit Du Dich in das Thema OSM ein bisschen einlesen kannst.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-26 08:05:14+00:00): Segui il wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale troverai di sicuro il tag adatto piuttosto che inserire il dato in description.
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-26 08:07:03+00:00): Ho cercato, prova a vedere se intendi questo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Ddry_cleaning
p.s.: Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap
Hjart (2018-01-24 19:14:06+00:00): Bemærk at bygninger mm kan gøres pænt retvinklede ved at trykke 'S' eller højreklikke og vælge 3. ikon i menuen ved musen
eggie (2018-01-24 19:03:49+00:00): Dag Dylan, Zou je svp  je commentaar zo kunnen verwoorden dat andere mappers begrijpen wat je aan het doen bent.
Dylan steen (2018-01-24 19:05:40+00:00): Ga ik doen👍👍
eggie (2018-01-24 19:07:11+00:00): TOP!
frodrigo (2018-01-28 19:44:06+00:00): Note: your contributions to OpenStreetMap are public. Keep this in mind when contributing.
I remove the two car rentals, and a duplicate cafe (Finca Raul).
Thank anyway for contributing.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
RiverBearings (2021-05-25 23:15:40+00:00): Hello qualhano, 
I was looking for ways to update conditional oneways in Brazil and found this section of highway ES-162 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88360736) in the City of Presidente Kennedy. It is currently set to oneway=reversible and there is no ground imagery of signs that indicate what times of day the road flows south and which times north. Do you have any knowledge of the conditional oneway times here? Thanks for your consideration.

Ola qualhano,
Eu estava procurando maneiras de atualizar as vias condicionadas no Brasil e encontrei este trecho da rodovia ES-162 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88360736) na cidade de Presidente Kennedy. Atualmente, está definido como oneeway = reversible e não há imagens de solo de sinais que indiquem a que horas do dia a estrada flui para o sul e a que horas para o norte. Você tem algum conhecimento dos tempos condicionais de sentido único aqui? Obrigado pela sua consideração.
Luba Leong (2018-01-24 19:21:11+00:00): The building footprints which I traced in November 2017 have shifted since then.  I believe that someone else is editing in this square and that they have been using a different source (CanVec 6.0 - NRCan) rather than Bing Satellite imagery.
Luba Leong (2018-01-24 19:22:19+00:00): Tagged locations use CanVec 6.0 - NRCan as the source.
Digne (2018-01-24 21:18:28+00:00): Hallo OxyContin,

Welkom bij Openstreetmap.

Ik heb uitgebreid welkomstbericht als privébericht gestuurd.
RicoElectrico (2018-01-25 14:27:47+00:00): Cześć, mam dwie uwagi:

Wyrównuj budynki do prostych kątów gdy potrzeba. Masz w edytorze iD do tego klawisz S albo opcję po kliknięci prawym przyciskiem myszy na budynku. Proszę o poprawę.

Masz jakieś pytania? Pisz śmiało, bo nie gryzę. Każdy na początku robił błędy, ale ważne jest nabierać wiedzę ;)

Komentarz do zestawu zmian nie jest adekwatny, ponieważ mógłby opisywać prawie każdą edycję. Zamiast tego można napisać: "Niepoczołowice - dodano budynki i narysowano pola uprawne"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Bardzo polecam Ci zajrzenie w pomoc dostępną w edytorze iD i przejście od deski do deski samouczka. Zawiera on np. informację jak prostować budynki przy ich rysowaniu.
Adam Gekon (2018-01-26 13:19:25+00:00): @RicoElectrico Dzięki za dobry komentarz.
user_5359 (2018-01-25 05:57:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
Sean Grogan (2018-01-25 15:44:36+00:00): Sorry!  

Which building did I mess up?  I created the park, but the other buildings I thought I just added addresses and other details.
Sean Grogan (2018-01-25 15:44:53+00:00): or at least I think I did
Sean Grogan (2018-01-25 15:51:39+00:00): Oh!  I think I figured it out, it was the Armory?  I marked it as landuse=military?
user_5359 (2018-01-25 15:59:53+00:00): yes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332716386/history
Prince Kassad (2018-01-24 21:52:38+00:00): ist die B 417 wirklich einspurig? Zwei Autos können sich hier nicht begegnen und müssen aufs Bankett ausweichen um aneinander vorbeizukommen?
kreuzschnabel (2019-08-21 19:05:51+00:00): Erstens schließe ich mich Prince Kassad an – die Straße ist hier definitiv zweispurig, lanes=1 ist also falsch. Zweitens ist hier ein Tempolimit von 50 km/h ausgeschildert, maxspeed=100 ist also auch falsch. Siehe https://openstreetcam.org/details/1948105/1504/track-info . 
 
Bitte keine Daten wild raten, sondern nur das mappen, was du aus sicherer Quelle (selbst gesehen, Mapillary, Openstreetcam …) kennst!
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
viloan (2018-01-24 19:37:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Glassman (2018-01-24 20:41:39+00:00): Sushanta,
You added an untagged way from 118th Place Northeast. It wasn't on any of the imagery plus it ran right through the house at 11840. I removed it. My other questions is you added an address node for 11905 NE 70th in front of the same house at 11840. Is that correct? I couldn't see another house on the imagery. Let me know if I can help you.
Digne (2018-01-24 21:20:04+00:00): Hallo gwvm,

Welkom bij Openstreetmap.

Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat nuttige informatie gestuurd als privébericht.
A67-A67 (2018-01-24 23:46:12+00:00): Bedankt voor de informatie dat de noordelijkste huizen niet bij de Superlofts horen, maar het zuidelijke deel heeft wel gewoon die naam. Daarom hoort de naam niet verwijderd te worden, maar het gebied moet worden gesplitst in een deel 'Superlofts' en een deel met de meer generieke naam 'Coendersbuurt blok C.'
A67-A67 (2018-01-24 23:48:16+00:00): Ik heb het nu aangepast. Het is dus niet de bedoeling om zomaar informatie te verwijderen.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
narceliodesa (2018-01-25 19:47:20+00:00): Olá Tarciano, tudo bem? 
Você poderia explicar o que significa essas edições?
naoliv (2018-01-26 00:01:33+00:00): Cara de Pokemon
Vários objetos que claramente não existe no mapa (não só nesse changeset, mas em outros também)
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
herriotto (2018-01-25 18:35:54+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55723032
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
kaltuna (2018-02-28 16:14:25+00:00): Hallo, schaust Du bitte mal den Hinweismarker an ? Du hast das Baufeld nach Westen vergrößert und dabei die Flugzeugpositionen V310 usw. gelöscht, was falsch ist. Sie existieren nach wie vor. Das Baufeld ersteckt sich hier nicht so weit nach Westen, wie aktuell kartiert. Gibt es ne Möglichkeit, das wieder Rückgängig zu machen ? Ansonsten werde ich nochmal meine Beziehungen zu Fraport spielen lassen und mir die Geodaten der Positionen und des Rollfeldes geben, wenn Du nichts dagegen hast. Gruß !
Nakaner (2018-02-28 18:22:16+00:00): Hallo kaltuna,

soll der Änderungssatz ganz oder teilweise zurückgesetzt werden? In beiden Fällen kann man das mit dem Reverter-Plugin für JOSM machen. Bei einem teilweisen Revert muss man die Objekte, die man zurücksetzen möchte, markieren und dann die Auswahl (statt alles – eigener Menüpunkt unter "Datei") hochladen.

Falls du noch Fragen hast, hilft man dir im deutschen OSM-Forum, im IRC oder auf der Mailingliste Talk-de gerne.

Viele Grüße

Michael
kaltuna (2018-02-28 18:36:24+00:00): Hallo Michael, danke für die Infos zum Reverter. Von dem habe ich bereits gehört und falls der Verursacher mittelfristig nicht reagiert, werde ich davon Gebrauch machen. Ich würde jedoch erst einmal erwarten, dass es von ihm selbst gemacht wird. Um deine Frage zu beantworten: nicht der gesamte changeset muss rückgängig gemacht werden, nur der westliche Teil des Baufeldes. Viele Grüße, Kent
rene78 (2018-02-28 19:50:16+00:00): Hi Kent, da war ich zu voreilig und habe mich auf die - wohl veralteten Aufnahmen - von DigitalGlobe verlassen. Die Sentinel-Aufnahme von 24.02 bestätigt Deine Aussage voll und ganz. Ich habe soeben den kompletten Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht.

Sentinel-Aufnahme: https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/#lat=50.02877&lng=8.57322&zoom=15&time=2018-02-24&preset=1_TRUE_COLOR&datasource=Sentinel-2%20L1C
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-06-27 21:44:53+00:00): Hi,
Der Radweg in der Bahnhofstr. ist ja nur ein aufgemalter Schutzstreifen AUF der Fahrbahn. Er ist daher nicht als eigenständiger Radweg zu mappen. Statt highway=cycleway wäre hier mMn das Straßenbegleitende Tagging cycleway:left=shared_lane usw. korrekt.  Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Der Radweg in der Grazerstr. ist ein Bordsteinradweg. In OSM gilt das nicht als bauliche Trennung. Daher lautet die Empfehlung den Radweg straßenbegleitend zu taggen (s. Link oben). Es gibt allerdings auch Gründe davon abzuweichen. Welche hattest du?

Eine Radroute ist etwas völlig anderes als ein Radweg. Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Fahrradroutentagging. Bitte löse diese Relation wieder auf.
LG Robert
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-07-06 07:07:09+00:00): Fehler behoben
M!dgard (2018-01-24 20:41:33+00:00): I also sent this message in PM since catweazle67 seems to ignore changeset comments: 

I believe you are doing undiscussed building imports.

This is against the rules of OSM: only import stuff with community consensus, and following the Import rules as described in the wiki.

You have already been warned in [changeset comments by various users](http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1976209) and you never replied. If you make two more changesets before replying, I will be forced to contact the Data Working Group who are likely to ban you.

M!dgard
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Jason Harrison (2018-01-25 02:05:25+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55723174
dgitto (2018-01-24 20:28:51+00:00): benvenuto in OSM!
Danieleleinad (2018-01-24 20:32:59+00:00): Grazie mille ;) se hai consigli da darmi sono ben accetti ;)
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
viloan (2018-01-24 20:31:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-25 05:52:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Carnildo (2018-01-25 00:09:53+00:00): Don't use Google Earth as a source for mapping.  The Google terms of service and OpenStreetMap policy both prohibit it, and Google tends to get upset about this in legally unpleasant ways.

(Additionally, it's likely that Google Earth got this wrong: the Kootenai National Forest website, which *is* a permissible source, calls it "Barron Creek Boating Site".)