piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Noro Hibu (2016-10-23 14:29:00+00:00): Hi.
Forget to write - fix intersection waterway/highway (no bridge, culvert, etc.)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:54:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
5m4u9 (2016-12-04 02:55:58+00:00): hola, al perecer accidentalmente eliminaste el punto que representa a la ciudad de cusco. mucho cuidado al eliminar. :)

ya restituimos la información anterior
TheSwavu (2016-10-24 21:41:24+00:00): Each node on a power line way needs a tower or pole tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dline).

You seem to have created about a 1000 new Osmose warnings in NSW:

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=16210&item=7040&class=4
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-11-03 06:40:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:29:10+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mueschel (2016-10-24 10:52:47+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du einen Blick auf den Namen hier werfen? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23895705
Da stimmt was am Tagging nich.

Gruss, Jan
Hans Loderer (2016-10-24 15:14:54+00:00): Tippfehler korrigiert.
Danke für den Hinweis
Gruss Hans
kiaraSh-Q (2018-12-16 22:43:21+00:00): سلام 
شما توی این چنج ست برای کل محدوده ی پمپ گاز شهرک مطهری کرمان از تگ 
building=roof
استفاده کردین که این کار اشتباه هست. 
این تگ مربوط به ساختمانهاست و فقط برای ساختمانها باید استفاده بشه.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 06:50:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:29:50+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 06:51:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:30:37+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 07:14:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:31:21+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
aceman444 (2021-02-16 11:25:16+00:00): Hallo, wo sind dann die local_ref Markierungen? Du hast die Namen im 'name' ins Nummern gewechselt, wenn die ins 'local_ref' gehen sollten, wie Du korrekt geschrieben hast. Die Namen sollten geblieben sein. Bitte repariere das, danke.
emergency99 (2021-02-16 19:52:00+00:00): stop_positions sollen loa_ref haben, PLATFORMS sollen ihre ID (NUMMER, Buchstabe) als Namen haben. Genau so ist es hier. Nicht stop positions und platforms verwechseln.
emergency99 (2021-02-16 19:55:11+00:00): Alles andere wäre unnötige Redundanz wovon im pt2 eh schon genug existiert.
emergency99 (2021-02-16 19:59:47+00:00): Was halt nicht hilft ist, dass die Wiki immer mal wieder umgeschrieben wird. Last time i checked sollte die Nummer in den namen, jetzt steht da in den REF, der wie ich zu mappen begann für ganz anderes genutzzt werden sollte. Aber die daten hier sind kosistent, somit lasse ich das so. Es ist so nicht falsch... Und eben konsistent mit meine gesamten anderen Mappen im VOR.
aceman444 (2021-02-16 20:47:44+00:00): Ich dennke nicht die Nummern waren irgendwann im 'name' im PTv2 schema. Kannst Du mir das auf der Wiki fuer platform zeigen?Ja, da ist 'ref' und auch 'local_ref' zur verfuegung.

Ich fragte nur dass Du im Kommentar sagtest Du gibts die Steignummern ins 'local_ref' aber hast Du die ins 'name' geschrieben.
emergency99 (2021-02-16 20:53:34+00:00): Ich habe sie bei den stop_positions ins local_ref und bei den platforms ins name gegeben. ich halte mich halt in changeset kommentaren so kurz wie möglich... Wie gesagt. Die Wiki ändert sich immer mal obwohl sich ja ansich das pt2 proposal nicht ändert. Ich suche jetzt nicht den Wildwuchs raus, das ist nicht mein Problem, aber gerade bei Platformen ist die Lokale nummer eigentlich eher der name, während die stop_area und auch die stop_positions diese Info um den Stationsnamen eh enthalten. Es ist so zumindest für das Lokale zurechtfinden durchaus sinnvoll und wie gesagt durch aus konsistent.
aceman444 (2021-02-16 21:31:12+00:00): Ich denke nicht es ist noetig die Platformnummer im standard osm.org Karte anzuzeigen. Eine spezializierte Karte wie OPNVKarte oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/48.15745/17.10642&layers=TN kann sie schon aus local_ref nehmen.

Aber gut, die Sache ist geschlossen, danke.
DavidKewley (2016-10-23 18:55:37+00:00): You placed this far from the address you give for this business, in the middle of the high school campus, which is clearly wrong. You also call it a place_of_worship, which is clearly wrong. Please fix these, or this changeset may need to be reverted. Thanks!
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 23:23:31+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44672005.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 07:18:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:32:24+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Warin61 (2018-10-27 05:14:30+00:00): Wikipedia is not a source compatible with OSM licensing.
bluetable (2018-10-27 15:34:07+00:00): Hi Warin61. I guess, I wasn't very clear with my source tag. I didn't import any data from Wikipedia, the multipolygon was an original creation, roughly mapping my basic knowledge of the Great Sandy Strait. I actually only used Wikipedia to double check the spelling. I should have mapped with the tag "source=local knowledge" at that time I suppose, my bad. I have spent quite a long time mapping the straits, none of it which was imported from anywhere. It'd be a real shame to see this relation deleted.
Warin61 (2018-10-27 22:32:52+00:00): You have other changesets with similar source statements - suggest you review them and make suitable comments on them too.
bluetable (2018-10-27 23:44:15+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I admit not being aware of this licensing issue. I have been using Wikipedia as a source to double check information before upload. I won't do it anymore. Thanks.
Warin61 (2018-10-28 22:58:01+00:00): You might do a 'confidence check' using 'other sources'. But the primary source should be OSM compatible. 

------------------------
You should recheck this relation. A mapper has removed some sections, and I have then removed an inner that is no longer an inner. I have also included a source tag.
bluetable (2018-10-29 00:02:46+00:00): I'll definitely keep that in mind, thanks. Your correction looks good to me. Cheers.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 07:20:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:33:15+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
rarad74 (2016-10-22 15:54:24+00:00): Salut. Numele este Sensiblu nu Sensiblue...
30303020 (2017-12-01 11:45:57+00:00): Hey PeetTheEngineer,
stations which are dismantled or permanently out of use should be either tagged with »railway:historic=station_site« or »railway:historic=station« (depending upon what is left of the station). It they are tagged as »railway=station«, there will be no visual difference to an operational station in Mapnik rendering, so someone might think that the station is still operational. 
Ref: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Stations_and_sites_which_are_not_currently_in_operation
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:00:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:34:00+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:05:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:34:40+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:08:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:35:36+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:12:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:36:13+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:14:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:36:54+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
literan (2016-10-22 11:15:30+00:00): это НЕ название магазина, а марка продающихся автомобилей
RafalR (2016-11-01 08:32:46+00:00): Przy dodanych punktach usługowych brakuje nazw.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 19:16:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:37:45+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
GOwin (2016-10-27 07:04:50+00:00): Good job! Welcome to OSM.
user_5359 (2016-11-03 18:55:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:41:57+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:02:10+00:00): OSM Cleanup 

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-22 18:43:15+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
marc__marc (2021-03-09 22:39:10+00:00): Bonjour,
un niveau -0.4 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
thbz (2021-03-10 21:17:00+00:00): Pourquoi pas ? Le Louvre, et la cour Puget en particulier, a tellement de niveaux différents qu'on est obligé d'avoir des numéros décimaux.
Hjart (2016-10-22 17:18:05+00:00): Bemærk at disse beskrivelser på selve stierne er helt overflødige.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 16:51:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:53:18+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-23 16:51:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:53:51+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
RoterEmil (2016-10-25 08:55:23+00:00): Hallo Balgofil,
warum hast Du denn (zum Beispiel) an der Haltestelle Hertzallee den bus_stop-Tag entfernt. Damit haben die Busse dort keinen Halt mehr! Auch weitere Haltestellen hast Du ja geändert - vielleicht gibt es ja einen guten Grund ;)

Schönen Gruß
Balgofil (2016-10-25 15:47:39+00:00): Hallo RoterEmil,

wenn du mit der Hertzallee das Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1700702840 meinst: das war ich nicht, das war Axel Mauruszat. Ich habe in diesem Changeset ein paar public_transport und bus Tags von Knoten gelöscht, da die Knoten Teile von public_transport ways sind. Im Zuge dessen habe ich auch die Buslinien platformen auf die Ways umgezogen. Die Busse haben überall dort ein Halt, wo ein platform und/oder stop in ihrer Relation steht. Alles andere sind physische Bushaltestellen, an denen aber nicht unbedingt ein Bus halten muss.

Mir könnte durch aus ein Fehler unterlaufen sein. Wenn dir einer auffällt bitte melden.

Gruß,
Balgofil
RoterEmil (2016-10-25 22:13:12+00:00): Hallo Balgofil,
danke für die schnelle Reaktion ;) Vorneweg: es scheint doch alles in Ordnung zu sein. Ich meinte zwar die konkrete Abfahrthaltestelle Hertzallee (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/277023071). Zunächst hatte ich nicht verstanden, warum der Busstop von eben dieser Haltestelle auf die Fahrbahn ("stop") gewandert ist. Das sieht ja nun doch viel ordentlicher aus. Gibt es eigentlich einen "Masterplan Bus(relationen)" in Berlin? Mir scheint alles sehr fragmentarisch zu verlaufen und ohne festes System!?
Dank
Balgofil (2016-10-26 18:52:42+00:00): Hallo RoterEmil,
ich habe vor sukzessive alle Berliner Buslinien auf das V2 Schema umzustellen. Die Hin- und Rückrouten existieren meist bereits. Aber für diese wird noch das alte Schema verwendet. Es ist also ein riesiger Mischmasch von neu und alt. Zusätzlich existieren auch noch riesige Sammelrelationen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18812. Was mit denen passiert weiß ich noch nicht. Also wenn du das mit Masterplan meinst(!?): Den gibt es AFAIK nicht.
Happy mapping,
Balgofil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
iBiS_GEO (2016-10-22 19:22:22+00:00): Хотел поинтересоваться, по какому принципу вносите правки в сделанные описания? Вы владелец объекта? Или Вы администратор данного участка территории?
iBiS_GEO (2016-10-22 19:23:08+00:00): Вопрос относительно "Церковь Спаса Нерукотворного (206084097, v4)"
literan (2016-10-23 12:14:58+00:00): В проекте нет админов и владельцев. Здесь гегемония того, кто что-то делает. Есть вики, где описаны правила применения тегов, вы их проигнорировали. Я исправил.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-22 18:42:31+00:00): Hej, nie rób takich pętelek: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448935164, bo ja dostaję powiadomienia o takich i muszę sprawdzać, czy ktoś przypadkiem nie dodał ronda z wybrakowanym tagowaniem. Dzięki :-)
user_5359 (2016-10-23 16:17:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:54:01+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_18526234 (2023-03-02 15:36:17+00:00): Hello myfanwy,
I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:
https://www.osm.org/way/448936052
    
I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. 
  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed
  
Would you mind it if I change this objects tag from man_made=flowerbed to landcover=flowerbed? Or even better would be if you change it to show support to landcover=flowerbed.
Please let me know what you think.
  
Best regards,
Tjuro
marcoos69 (2016-10-22 13:05:19+00:00): Ta elektrownia (jako cały teren) jest przeznaczona na sprzedaż, więc "w likwidacji" jest bardziej zgodne z prawdą niż "nieczynne", co sugeruje, że jest to stan tymczasowy i będzie ponownie działać.
źródło: http://tinyurl.com/gqd7g94
user_5359 (2016-10-23 16:00:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:54:10+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
MichaelVL (2016-10-22 13:10:37+00:00): Hej Peter,

Et lille hint:  Så vidt jeg ved er den anbefalede måde at angive source at tilføje det som et ekstra tag til changesettet, se fx. http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/43080435
Hjart (2016-10-22 16:45:34+00:00): Yeps. JOSM & iD er for nogen tid siden begyndt at angive hvilke baggrunde mm man har brugt (se boksen ovenfor kommentarerne her).
peterleth (2016-10-22 18:29:59+00:00): Jeg har brug for lidt hjælp her. Jeg kan ikke se hvordan jeg får tilføjet et source-tag, når jeg vil gemme en række ændringer lavet med ID-editoren.
Hjart (2016-10-22 19:06:39+00:00): Du behøver ikke gøre noget. Den angiver automatisk den aktive baggrund, præcist som det var tilfældet med dette rettesæt (det relevante tag hedder her "imagery_used") source bruges nu kun til at angive andre typer kilder.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 15:59:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:54:34+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
glglgl (2016-10-24 09:49:06+00:00): It would have been better to keep the changes in Hamburg and in Saint-François in separate changesets. This way, a huge changeset covering half Western Europe and half Northwestern Africa has been created.
Self-Perfection (2016-10-22 21:47:05+00:00): Обратите внимание, что в месте физического пересечения дорог они должны иметь общую точку, чтобы движки построения маршрутов знали, что тут можно повернуть с одной дороги на другую. И похоже вы даже пытались правильно поставить точку https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1185020263 но не получилось: она принадлежит только автомобильной дороге. Так же у вас не получилось привязать  ворота https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4459287081 к линии забора.

Совет: в таких случаях всегда проверяйте, что точка действительно принадлежит всем путям, которым вы хотите. Проще всего это сделать переместив точку в сторону от правильного положения и убедившись, что все линии, которым она должна принадлежать, искривились. А потом вернуть на правильное место, отменив последнее действие (Ctrl-Z).

Ну и вообще я полагаю, что в редакторе JOSM так налажать сложнее, чем в iD.