piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gileri (2017-02-15 03:23:39+00:00): Hello, first of all this changeset provides a lot of detail and updates, thank you for that !

Could you supply more precise changeset messages ? All changesets are (or should) be about improving the map, there is no need tell that in changeset messages :)

Also, please note that the correct case for operator=Erdf should be ERDF :
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enedis

Then, I see that you added check_date=* in the future, could you explain why ? This tag, from the wiki page, should be a present or past date.

You may be already aware, but in any case there is local aerial photography from the Greater Lyon :
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/France#Lyon-Orthophoto2015-058cm-EPSG:3946

It is often more up-to-date and provide greater detail than other imagery (Bing, BDOrtho)
gileri (2017-02-15 03:29:43+00:00): Also the building west of "Gare Part-Dieu" were removed, could you remove those ways ?

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474693145 and the others nearby)
Super-Map (2017-02-15 10:23:41+00:00): Hi, Gilery,
"Improve map" because I use several forensic tools to improve this map, like Josm "data validator" check and others external, as you know.... I can't tell you what I do "precisely", I do too much "corrections"...
I had write "Erdf", because I have received an "error" message in Josm, you know... but I think it's a misunderstanding of myself, thank for the link, it's will be useful "next time" if I encounter the same message. I have do that "quickly" as you could divine. 
Why "check_date" tag? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date  I use always this key for an area under construction, or an highway for, by this way it's impossible to forget the "detail".... for "everybody" not only for me. Maybe you living in this city: "Lyon", but like me, numerous of contributors have never go over there. So, I will return on this "features" when the date will be arrived in term. thanks for your understanding. Have a nice "contributions", day.

Super-Map, why? Because it's a SUPER MAP!... As you know.
Super-Map (2017-02-15 10:32:22+00:00): Why I must remove those "buildings" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474693145 and the others nearby) It's on the "Cadastre"?
gileri (2017-02-15 18:22:16+00:00): Regarding operators tags I know it's not always easy to check exactly how it should be spelt, but before correcting a "mistake" it is better to check with tools available to you, such as wikipedia, and taginfo; in this case this error could have been avoided easily.

On check_date, I understand what you meant when you used them; however it is not the role of this tag : "The tag is intended to document the last date, when an object as a whole or specific tags of the object were checked and verified."

Maybe use opening_date=* or end_date=* would be more suitable.

Regarding the building just west of the train station, they were removed somewhat recently to make room for a big reorganization.

See this : http://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/auvergne-rhone-alpes/projet-part-dieu-demolition-du-batiment-b10-va-bon-train-805279.html

Have a good day!
Super-Map (2017-02-16 10:15:38+00:00): Hi gileri,
Surely I haven't all skill you have, because we haven't the same "luck" in the life and you know that perfectly... we are able to see that each days throughout this project. However, I use several quality assurance tools for to do lot of corrections. As you know so much we aren't enough for to update the whole of the map, all cities, towns, villages and so one.... Probably I do mistakes, be cause I'm just "human" like all of us. However, I work freely on this project, and for free, I earn no money by this way...
I use this key: "check_date" it isn't without real reasons I know perfectly what I do wiki: " check_date=* used with highway=construction and opening_date=...) so it's used for future "event"! If you prefer it's an "alert" for to tell you the construction is "finished" you can draw the element. You can combined and use this key: "opening_date" if you know "precisely" when the element will be "open"!
http://imgur.com/a/TNVLr You have the same "alert" with the key: "check_date"
So if I represent an element under construction in specific time, in the future I will be "alerted"! If I can't represent the element, because I don't know the real date when this element will be "built", so I change the date for a future date, again", until I will able to do all change and update in OSM. Thanks for you understanding.
Secondly I don't know if in OSM we haven the right to use this "information" of "france3" for to update something? But I consider you living in this city and know this "place". However if you look the map, we are unable to see those building, because this area (highway pedestrian) wasn't draw properly and it isn't visible on the map, only if you use humanitarian layer. So the question is: "do you know this place "personally"? In the contrary, I haven't the right to delete the building until It was deleted on the cadastre... And someone can redraw the building between this lap time. You have the possibility to put a specific note and delete those building after "survey". But you know, one more time, we aren't enough for to update all details. So if you need this place with this layer...
I like very much this project and not only... because I know "perfectly" what we can do with those projects... However, I'm unable to "speak" in a certain "language"... I use tools for to make map if I need it. And I know perfectly this map it isn't make for to make money, for to ruin someone but for to "help" somebody! Like humanitarian teams, ONG, Doctors without borders (MSF) and so one...
So I know this country...
Super-Map (2017-02-18 21:39:49+00:00): Probably it's a better use to use in the first: "opening_date" key, because you have the ability to select it in your favorite "checker"...
However with: "check_date" key only we have the same effect on a construction element.
Ritxarcontx (2022-01-01 18:26:09+00:00): Ya no existe
surveyor54 (2017-02-28 13:57:42+00:00): In Zukunft Statuen bitte so mappen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4678547910

Gruß
surveyor54
robert (2017-02-14 22:51:03+00:00): I think you've misunderstood the point of OpenStreetMap. Edits to the map are globally visible, much like edits to wikipedia - it's not intended for personal geographical notes.
Kazing (2017-02-15 20:57:47+00:00): Hello,
You've added the adress 'rue du bain au plante', it's the adress of 'Suspenders coffee' (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4598296541) not 'Café Bretelles'
I'll remove this adress
Regards
eggie (2020-09-20 09:27:02+00:00): Hoi,

'k Heb even op deze note geacteerd.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2353353#map=19/51.79288/4.55071&layers=N
 Op de OFM werd je in de routering over het Campina-terrein heen gestuurd. Nu alles op access=private ipv access=permissive
MVG,
eggie
SomeoneElse (2018-08-17 13:18:32+00:00): Hello fayor,
Can you explain what the problem was with the roads that you deleted here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-17 13:23:49+00:00): Also, what was the source that you used to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474705701 ?
fayor (2018-08-17 13:50:25+00:00): Ciao Andy, scusami ma dopo un anno non posso ricordare nulla nello specifico. Se qualcuno si è accorto di errori o inesattezze può correggere senza problemi.
bubix (2018-08-20 09:15:13+00:00): Innanzitutto grazie per tuo prezioso nell'aggiornare le mappe Osm. Nel caso di Punta Secca ed in particolare della strada da te indicata Via Filippo Pennavira https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474705701 il mio consiglio è nel dubbio di non nominare strade prese da altre fonti (https://www.viamichelin.it o https://wego.here.com/?map=36.78775,14.49716,19,normal) Comunque verificherò di presenza in quanto sarò in vacanza da quelle parti.
Grazie mille!
Bubix
fayor (2018-08-20 14:23:30+00:00): Non so quanto possa servire verificare di presenza… se non c'è una targa ciò non significa che la strada non si chiami così e spesso nemmeno gli abitanti lo sanno. Per certo la via rientra nello stradario comunale dell'Agenzia delle Entrate. Le "altre fonti" possono servire a individuare la posizione della strada, io non copio da nessun'altra mappa senza verificare il più possibile.
bubix (2018-08-22 05:59:48+00:00): Dai dati Istat http://www.istat.it/.../dati.../dati_sc_provvisori.zip Censimento ISTAT 2011 risulta un solo civico "19;Sicilia;088;Ragusa;010;Santa Croce Camerina;88010;8801010001;10001;Caucana-Finaiti-Casuzze-Finaiti N.;1;;;VIA;FILIPPO PENNAVARIA;1;" che non ha coordinate...riesci mica e reperire informazioni di localizzaione dello stradario dell'Agenzia delle Entrate....se no si dovrebbe recuperare l'atto del comune che ha definito la via...
Bubix
corfede (2018-08-22 10:41:20+00:00): Ciao Fayor, posso dire per esperienza diretta che non sono rari i casi di errori anche sullo stradario dell'Agenzia delle Entrate. Come indicato da Paolo l'atto deliberativo del comune dovrebbe togliere ogni dubbio. Ciao, Federico.
bubix (2018-09-12 10:18:53+00:00): Nel mese di agosto 2018 ho incontrato i tecnici del comune di Santa Croce Camerina che mi hanno permesso di consultare l'Ordinanza n.103 del 31.07.1995 prot.12485 riguardante la denominazione dei toponimi di Punta Secca. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Ordinanza_103.pdf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Allegato_ordinanza_103.pdf). Tale atto ha istituito effettivamente la via Filippo Pennavaria che ad oggi risulta posizionata come aveva correttamente indicato fayor. Nel corso del tempo la strada è divenuta privata e chiusa al pubblico transito. Pertanto la legge vieta di assegnare civici su strade private ed infatti i proprietari hanno posizionato all'inizio della strada il civico n. 4 riferito a Corso Mediterraneo (la strada principale a cui si interseca la via Filippo Pennavara). Formalmente la strada esiste in virtù dell'ordinanza n.103 indi per cui dovrebbe essere cancellato con un successivo atto. Quindi ad oggi anche se scorrettamente rappresentata virtualmente risulta in essere "Via Filippo Pennvara." In ultimo chiedo gentimente a fayor di chiarare espressamente dove reperisce le informazioni che mappa per non incorrere in altre situazioni anomale. Saluti bubix
fayor (2018-09-12 15:04:02+00:00): Le situazioni anomale di cui parli derivano dal sospetto ingiustificato di altri utenti, in disaccordo per vari motivi su quanto viene mappato. Ho già chiarito che l'informazione riguardante quella via, come pure di tute le altre, l'ho ricavata dai dati Istat e dell'Agenzia delle Entrate (che sono dati comunicati a questi enti dal comune interessato). Ogni informazione è comunque confrontata e incrociata con le altre reperibili da ricerche in rete o da conoscenza diretta o indiretta, in modo da ottenere con ragionevole probabilità una rappresentazione aderente alla realtà.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-15 12:22:00+00:00): Have you got a link for "Le situazioni anomale di cui parli derivano dal sospetto ingiustificato di altri utenti"?
mikelmaron (2017-03-08 21:42:15+00:00): Hello! 
Portions of T36 don't match what is visible in Bing imagery. Is the Bing imagery out of date?
-Mikel
GeoCrazy (2017-03-09 21:35:28+00:00): Imagery is from 2011 and part of the road location has changed and was updated accordingly.
Glassman (2017-02-15 06:58:39+00:00): This isn't the right place to test changes. We do have a dev server. Let me know if you are interested. Otherwise I suggest you check out http://learnosm.org or click on help.
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-19 09:49:07+00:00): Hi Neafullio, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46093620
Neafullio (2017-02-23 00:52:11+00:00): ok I did. I am sorry
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-19 09:50:32+00:00): Hi Msadule, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46093662

And of course, DON'T USE GOOGLE MAPS AS A SOURCE!
aceman444 (2026-03-01 12:23:35+00:00): Hi, where do you have the address Palackeho 35/1 from? On building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56305186 .
Carlos Brys (2017-04-26 20:35:47+00:00): Se revierte la edición, porque se cambió la altura del edificio de departamentos que tiene 17 pìsos por uno de 4.
El edificio de la Facultad de Humanidades es el contìguo sobre calle Tucumán.
Hb- (2025-08-03 17:55:44+00:00): Die Dorfstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445507460 mit einer Fahrspur pro Richtung ohne weitere Abbiegepfeile wurde turn:lanes:forward= gemappt. Warum? Bläht das nicht nur unnütz auf?
TZorn (2017-02-22 15:33:24+00:00): Hallo Ohligser, 
ich kann deine Änderungen nicht alle ganz nachvollziehen. 

Den Weg von der Gezelinkapelle zur Alkenrather Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321278482) änderst du von hw=path zu hw=cycleway, die Fortsetzung entlang der Alkenrather Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321278484) dann aber von hw=cycleway zu hw=footway. Wo ist da die Konsistenz/Logik? Hw=path ist doch eine mittlerweile weit akzeptierte Syntax für kombinierte Wege, warum ändern?

Den Fuß-/Radweg entlang der Gustav-Heinmann-Str. (u. a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4867594) degradierst du dann zum Fußweg (hw=cycleway, foot=yes zu hw=footway, foot=yes). Ist das wirklich kein Radweg mehr?

Die Borsigstraße (u. a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4674663) bekommt ein bicycle=yes, was an einem hw=secondary schon implizit enthalten ist. MMn überflüssig.
ohligser (2017-02-23 22:01:29+00:00): Hallo TZorn,
danke der Rückfrage statt Edit-War. Ich antworte in Reihenfolge der Fragen:

1. Weg: hab ich als cycleway umgeschrieben, da der vorherige Way das auch ist (--> Konsistenz), und es sich um einen ausdrücklich beschilderten, _und_ eher guten Radweg, nicht Bürgersteig handelt.

2.: Fortsetzung Alkenrather Str.: Ist ein Bürgersteig mit Funktion "segregated", dennoch häufige Konfliktpunkte (Haltestellen, Breite, mäßige Straßenübergänge). M.E. daher nicht mal benutzungspflichtig für alle. Die Funktion unterscheidet ja doch zwischen primär Fuss- oder Radweg. Hier eher Fuss.

Und OK
* über den Übergangsbereich kann man streiten.
* Path wird ohne weitere Angaben in abgeleiteten Werken meist als was Unbefestigtes gedeutet. Ansonsten hast Du natürlich recht, mit allen Angaben ist eigentlich alles dasselbe (footway/cycleway/path).

3. (Gustav-Heinemann): Hab ich aus Konsistenzgründen getan - Seite gegenüber war auch Footway. Außerdem ist es - dito - in Teilbereichen ein Bürgersteig, wenn auch besserer Qualität.
Das "bicycle=yes" fehlt nun natürlich, trage ich sofort nach!

4. (Borsigstr): Wollte ich explizit festhalten, da bei mehrspurigen Zubringern nicht selbstverständlich. Auch wenn die Straße häßlich ist.

Ist das so ok für Dich?
TZorn (2017-02-28 11:06:06+00:00): Hallo Ohligser, dann alles ok.
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-19 09:51:17+00:00): Hi Msadule, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46094226
manoharuss (2017-02-15 05:55:39+00:00): Hi 느림보,


May I know why you deleted these relations that are administrative boundaries.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6940272/history

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6937056/history


Best,
Manohar
느림보 (2017-02-17 02:58:02+00:00): Hi Manohar, 

I deleted them because there exist more older and complete relationships.

For 6940272 : http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2409182
For 6937056 : http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2306392

Thank you for review my modification, I'll add  more detailed comments in English as well as Korean for reviewers..

Best,
Nrimbo
manoharuss (2017-02-17 05:41:13+00:00): Hi Nrimbo,

Thanks for the detailed reply and your mapping effort. May I also suggest keeping the size of the bbox of changeset to a smaller size with constant uploading. 

Best,

Manohar
西島太郎 (2017-02-15 06:21:55+00:00): OpenStreetMapなめとんのか？ゴミが
geodreieck4711 (2017-02-16 19:23:13+00:00): ... und beim highwaymapping 3 Relationen zerschossen.....
Luis36995 (2017-02-20 22:53:06+00:00): Thanks for collaborating with OpenStreepMap, the tags on this road were edited from highway = trunk_link to highway = residential
gmbo (2017-02-15 07:40:11+00:00): Habe Punkte ohne Merkmale entfernt.
Mata yang dikeluarkan tanpa ciri-ciri.
Polarbear-repair (2017-02-15 10:55:16+00:00): Hi yulistianto, your changeset contained 15 ways from testing the drawing function in your editor. 
When making tests in your editor, please make sure you do _not_ upload them to the database. 
In JOSM, go to the layers window and press the bin button for the Data Layer.
Errors deleted in CS 46103147.
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:14:25+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-02-15 04:58:40+00:00): [Cabanatuan] rename Chinabank branch (name formerly used should be on the operator tag), fix name of Ministop branch, remove descriptor on Jollibee branch (better add it on branch=* instead)
gmbo (2017-02-15 07:41:35+00:00): Du hast warscheinlich deine Tests nicht wiedergefunden.
Das gehört nicht in die Karte.
Bitte lösche das wieder.

Mungkin anda tidak menemui lagi ujian anda.
Ia tidak tergolong dalam peta.
Sila ini jelas sekali lagi.
Polarbear-repair (2017-02-15 10:09:04+00:00): Novice user experiments reverted in CS 46102205.

When making tests in your editor, please make sure you do _not_ upload them to the database. In JOSM, go to the layers window and press the bin button for the Data Layer.
Polarbear-repair (2017-02-15 10:32:32+00:00): Hi, if this is an open place for sports, please add leisure=pitch. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474741427
Nakaner (2017-09-04 22:33:41+00:00): Hallo Peter,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du den Verbindungskurven Namen gegeben. Benutzer flierfy meint, sie hätten keine eigenen Namen. Es hatte doch einen Grund, dass du sie benannt hast, oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51544364

Viele Grüße

Michael
bigbug21 (2017-09-05 06:12:50+00:00): Natürlich. Die Verbindungskurven tragen die in den Wikipedia-Artikeln genannten Namen.
Polarbear-repair (2017-02-15 10:31:25+00:00): Hi, on this object there is only a name, not what it is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474746691
If that is a school building, please add amenity=school and building=school
chnav (2017-06-28 10:17:45+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы не могли бы подсказать что означают данные объекты со странными названиями ? Пользователи жалуются что на карте ошибочно указаны "произведения искусства"
chnav (2017-06-28 10:18:17+00:00): Если это вызовы такси или службы 911 то им не место в проекте ОСМ.
Владимир К (2017-02-15 11:46:23+00:00): addr:street здесь точно не нужен :) может в описание его или уж в addr:full, если хочется адрес
afgul (2017-02-19 06:38:25+00:00): Кто бы сделал образец , кто его знает как правильно оформить ? Лично для меня достаточно и номера , и чтобы , особенно ночью и в метель , доехать до точки назначения .
Владимир К (2017-02-19 07:53:20+00:00): Ну вроде кусты надо отмечать полигоном вокруг территории, теги landuse=industrial+industrial=well_site. Номер принято писать в ref. Но не знаю, можно ли его будет пр такому номеру найти в том же османде. Так что наверно можно и на всякий случай подписать в название "куст хххх" А на территории куста уже отдельными точками скважины man_made=petroleum_well.
Владимир К (2017-02-19 08:09:18+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347633597#map=18/61.22007/76.63235&layers=D


Собственно тут все так и сделано. Только номер почему-то не совпадает с вашим :/
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:14:14+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
BeKri (2017-04-10 05:35:59+00:00): Servus,
Absicht, dass Du Deine Gebäude "nur" mit area=yes getaggt hast ?
building=yes wäre sinnviller, habe das ausgebessert
Gruss derBeKri
literan (2017-02-15 11:27:32+00:00): здравствуйте. Вы некорректно написали адрес: правильно номер дома писать с пробелом перед "с": 42 с16
tux67 (2017-02-15 08:38:47+00:00): Hi Stadni,
 
danke, daß du bei OSM mitmachst und hilfst die Daten zu verbessern.
Könntest du - da du das problem ja selber gelöst hast - auch noch den Kartenfehler schließen, den du geöffnet hast?

Danke & Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
Stadni (2017-02-15 08:41:00+00:00): Hi,
werde ich gerne machen. da ich aber, wie richtig bemerkt, erst frisch dabei bin, muß ich leider noch suxchen, wie ich das machen kann.
LG
Niclas (Stadni)
Stadni (2017-02-15 08:44:13+00:00): ich glaube, ich habs geschafft :)
tux67 (2017-02-15 09:23:12+00:00): Hast du .. Glückwunsch ... 
Bei offenen Fragen kannst du auch immer hier reinschauen:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
oder hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Polarbear-repair (2017-02-15 10:28:50+00:00): Hi, on some drawings you forgot the tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474759305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474759303
are probably buildings.
OF0 (2017-02-15 19:50:51+00:00): Ich glaube Du hast die ehemalige Prinz-Eugen-Kaserne in Külsheim mit der Carl-Schurz-Kaserne in Hardheim verwechselt, welche zur Zeit keine Truppen beherbergt, jedoch weiterhin existiert. Die Prinz-Eugen-Kaserne ist seit langem als commercial/industrial getagt.
Jaeger52 (2017-02-17 09:08:05+00:00): Hallo, sorry für den Mist den ich gebaut habe :-(. Ich habe das ja innerhalb von Minuten mit Hilfe des "reverters" in JOSM rückgängig gemacht. Mich hat es schon erstaunt, wie schnell der Fehler bemerkt wurde ;-). Grüße
TheSwavu (2017-04-10 02:14:07+00:00): You might want to take a look at :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47606103
eggie (2017-02-15 09:24:09+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Je edits zal ik even bekijken, want ik zie jee park verschijnen. Leisure=park wordt in de regel over de landuse=grass of landuse=village_green los heengetekend.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
eggie (2017-02-15 09:24:44+00:00): ... en een pad door het water geeft natte voeten.
xxireen (2017-02-15 09:41:25+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips! Zag dat je het al aangepast had. Dankjewel
eggie (2017-02-15 09:42:11+00:00): 'k heb even wat aangepast. de Leisure=park omgezet naar gras. Je kunt daar zelf Leisure=park los overheen leggen met de naam van het park. het park zat vastgekleefd aan de nieuwe weg. De weg door het water zat aan het water zelf vast. even losgemaakt en toegevoegd bridge=yes en layer=1
Elk begin heeft een leercurve dus aarzel niet te vragen en kijk zeker ook op het forum. Het pad heb ik ook beter gelegd. GPS tracklog gebruikt?