piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2016-10-30 12:52:16+00:00): Please do not use the OSM database for "search engine optimization".
All these tags on this POI are spam or do not follow common tagging
rules and should not appear in OSM:
  description = Carrie Rachel is a bonafide organizing expert. She’s ready to bring order and harmony to the lives of New Yorkers and help you organize your life.
  Business Hours = Mon - Fri : 9am-5pm
  Payment options = All major credit cards, cash, check
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:02:31+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Владимир К (2016-10-27 11:37:05+00:00): Вы создали рядом два объекта. Доставка паффин пицца и просто паффин пицца. Это ведь одно заведение? не нужно так делать. То, что есть доставка в кафе, отмечается тегами в полноценных редакторах
user_5359 (2016-10-27 19:11:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:03:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:03:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:03:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-27 19:10:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-10-27 09:33:39+00:00): 站牌信義國中已經有囉
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:04:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-27 19:10:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 19:18:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-10-29 14:16:11+00:00): Please don't add foreign names as names, obviously a supermaket in Rome is not called "супермаркет"
user_5359 (2016-10-27 19:06:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
letihu (2016-11-02 20:28:41+00:00): Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4465914792/history
sind von der fehlerhaften Wheelmapp app 43 Objekte platziert worden. Kaum ein node ist hier richtig.
Alle waren übereinander. Ich hab sie jetzt nebeneinander dargestellt, damit man sie sehen kann.
holgerd (2016-11-03 05:29:58+00:00): Danke für die Info. Wir haben schon begonnen das aufzuräumen und gehen das dann als nächstes durch. Sorry.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:57:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:56:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
whb (2016-11-19 23:28:49+00:00): Ist der Name der Firma wirklich "Sofienstraße 29":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4465994389
Kingd0m (2016-11-21 15:21:29+00:00): Es ist ein Bürogebäude mit mehreren Firmen darin. Das Gebäude hat keinen eigenen Namen.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:55:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:50:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:45:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:42:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-18 15:15:18+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
whb (2016-11-19 23:31:43+00:00): Name passt nicht zur Internetseite, bitte nochmals überprüfen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/660107116
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:39:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:38:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
poornibadrinath (2016-10-27 09:01:02+00:00): Wrong changeset comment. Sorry! 
The actual change was adding turn restrictions in SF using Mapillary. 
Changeset comment: Adding Turn Restrictions using Mapillary
Source: Bing, Mapbox Satellite, Mapillary. 

Poornima Badrinath
poornibadrinath (2016-10-27 09:01:44+00:00): Wrong changeset comment. Sorry! 
The actual change was adding turn restrictions in SF using Mapillary. 
Changeset comment: Adding Turn Restrictions using Mapillary
Source: Bing, Mapbox Satellite, Mapillary. 

Poornima Badrinath
letihu (2016-10-27 19:36:03+00:00): Warum werden hier 51 nodes übereinander dargestellt? Das kann nicht richtig sein. Was ist wheelmap für ein Programm, was solchen Quatsch macht?
DD1GJ (2016-10-27 21:47:17+00:00): Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=612885#p612885

@Brecht1: mach bitte sofort ein Update der App.
Allroads (2016-10-27 12:50:07+00:00): Import, unteachable, there is arbitrary line in your process. when I see such tags. pollution the database.
SHAPE_Area	35321.5061334
SHAPE_Leng	1264.64335154
landuse	landuse>grass
status	nov_2016
tekst	Plantcover
Commodoortje (2016-11-05 18:48:20+00:00): landuse=uitzoeken?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449665547
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2mfgvjpo10t9xak/2016-11-05_19-47-47.png?raw=1
barigela (2019-07-11 05:35:19+00:00): "Hi Farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 449670153
classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified'. 

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Farras (2019-07-12 01:07:21+00:00): Hi, barigela. Looks like you're correct. Thanks for fixing it.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-03-10 11:37:34+00:00): Hallo Kiekin,
was war der Grund für die Änderung der Baumschule in farmland?
Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2116257
Gruß
Roger Wilco
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 13:11:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Two short questions in this case: does the shop still sell organic products (organic=* still present from previous shop)?
What are the actual opening_hours=*? That should be tagged according https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.

Happy mapping! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask (auch auf Deutsch, falls dies besser passt).

Highflyer74

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!

All the best,

highflyer74
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:37:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:30:03+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:36:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:35:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:34:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:33:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
literan (2016-10-29 10:13:07+00:00): здравствуйте! сразу две ошибки: адрес правильно писать так: addr:housenumber=6 к1 и слово "Аптека" лишнее - тег name предназначен для названий, имен собственных (например, name=Планета здоровья). Я исправил.
MKnight (2016-10-28 20:14:40+00:00): Moin, wenn Du Gebäudetypen "korrigierst", dann achte doch bitte darauf, dass es hinterher stimmig ist, zwei Gebäude auf einer Grundfläche gibt es in den seltensten Fällen.
Ich korrigiere das (noch) mal.
fgouget (2017-12-10 23:13:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a un lieu-dit avec un nom bizarre (l4aR2NAS) dans ce changeset. Il y a aussi un nœud place sans nom (4466192840). 

Je n'ai pas vu de trace ni de l'un ni de l'autre, ni dans le cadastre ni dans la BAN.

Erreurs ?
Alecs01 (2016-10-27 19:47:37+00:00): Ciao Mauro, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, cosa intendendevi mappare qui? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4466137123 nel "linguaggio" dei tag di OpenStreetMap, shop=outdoor è un negozio di articoli da campeggio e simili http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutdoor
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 13:20:07+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall fiel mir auf, daß Du die Masten und die Leitung mit name=* versehen hast, obwohl schon ref=* vorhanden war (was richtig ist). Das name=* Tag wird ausschliesslich für Eigennamen verwendet. Die Funktion bzw. andere Eigenschaften eines Objekts ergeben sich aus anderen Tags. Sei mir nicht böse, wenn ich die Änderungen wieder zurücksetze.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

highflyer74
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:26:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:25:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Dakon (2021-01-25 18:28:27+00:00): Bist du dir mit dem Rettungsring da am Rastplatz sicher? Ich hätte an der Stelle sowas wie emergency=phone erwartet.
krevedko5 (2016-10-28 08:23:54+00:00): Этот коммит сломал кучу рендера. Описания нормального нет. Что это и зачем это сделано?
krevedko5 (2016-10-28 08:48:39+00:00): Сходу косяки: 

1. Надо вернуть мультиполигон леса западнее вуриоярви к исходному состоянию, чтобы просто шёл с севера на юг, без внезапных поворотов на восток.

2. Вуриоярви теперь не озеро, а овраг. Зачем вы объединили береговую линию? Всё ведь было хорошо. Как минимум, три мультиполигона из-за этого рассыпались.

3. Просьба НЕ игнорировать предупреждения JOSM, а читать их и разбираться с каждым предупреждением. Явно ведь было десяток предупреждений, что мультиполигоны не замкнуты.

4. Сегмент леса от Алакуртти до Кутсайоки уже был почти доделан, просто не было времени его активировать. Сейчас он разомкнут. Не надо сейчас там лес рисовать пытаться в этой области.

Если не можете, напишите, вечером сам это попробую разрулить.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:20:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
eggie (2017-10-12 07:41:30+00:00): Alsnog welkom gestuurd per PB
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:10:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 18:03:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364215320 ? I have delete your duplicate entry!
literan (2016-10-29 10:28:44+00:00): Наталья, вы задублировали теги amenity=kindergarten, а также название детского сада, в который раз. Сколько же мне еще за вами ходить и исправлять?
user_5359 (2016-10-27 17:58:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 17:56:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-18 15:06:42+00:00): I habe deleted your entry!
mavl (2016-11-17 16:49:27+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 14:40:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2016-11-17 16:51:14+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
mueschel (2016-10-30 12:40:15+00:00): Hi,
looking at the building you added here: It would be very helpful to stick with normal tags. E.g. all the opening_hour tags can not be understood by any software - they can be combined to one normal opening_hours tag. 
'Personne de contact' is better written as contact:name or contact:person
'prac' looks like a note or description to me.
And there is no physical tag what this actually is, despite a office=yes.

Cheers, Jan
PierZen (2016-10-30 13:27:47+00:00): Hi Jan, 
Thanks to spot this.
These tags have been added by the Potentiel 3.0 Field team that organized a UAV mission in this village. They took the time to add POI We are a team to support them at distance. This opening_hours does not look pertinent. I will remove.
mavl (2016-11-17 16:52:52+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 14:34:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-27 13:33:04+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

Hier wäre wohl ein shop=butcher zusätzlich angebracht.
user_5359 (2016-10-27 14:33:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359