piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dansit (2017-10-29 16:35:03+00:00): Можно пример где дубликаты. Нашел один. Здание в здании. Удалил. Нарисовал заново.Вроде больше нет
Если они есть предпочту удалить объект и нарисовать заново а не откатывать.
Хотя как то странно. Никогда еще у меня JOSM не делал дубликатов
dansit (2017-10-29 16:42:03+00:00): Я сам все исправлю
Gerold (2018-03-15 15:27:59+00:00): Hallo

Welche Kriterien siehst Du beim Saalplatz als nicht erfüllt, die er für das roundabout-Tagging bräuchte?
Zartbitter (2018-03-17 21:54:35+00:00): Der Saalplatz ist nicht als Kreisverkehr , sondern nur durch Vorfahrtsschilder geregelt. Verkehrsrechtlich ist er nur eine normale Straße, die eben (mehr oder weniger) zufällig kreisförmig ausgerichtet ist. Zumindest bis vor ein paar Monaten war da jedenfalls kein Kreisverkehr ausgeschildert.
Gerold (2018-03-24 16:01:51+00:00): Im Rahmen der StVO ist deine Argumentation sicher korrekt.

Nicht aber im Rahmen der OSM-Regelungen:

"Ein Kreisverkehr ist eine Verkehrskreuzung, bei welcher der Verkehr rund um eine nicht befahrbare Mittelinsel geführt wird und der Verkehr im Kreisverkehr Vorrang hat.
[...]
Kreisverkehre sind in der Regel durch Schilder gekennzeichnet"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout

Offensichtlich ist ein entsprechendes Schild für das Tagging als roundabout keine notwendige Voraussetzung, sonst müsste dort ja "immer" stehen anstatt "in der Regel".

Bitte mach deine Änderung wieder rückgängig und überleg vielleicht mal, ob Du so eine Änderung auch woanders durchgeführt hast.
Zartbitter (2018-03-27 06:35:08+00:00): Ich sehe das entspannter als du, denn nirgends im Wiki steht, dass man jede kreisförmige Straßenführung, die kein Kreisverkehr ist, trotzdem alternativlos als Kreisverkehr mappen muss, Und in D sind da doch einige rechtliche Unterschiede, die mir wichtig genug wären, um sie dadurch abzubilden. Aber da du unbedingt darauf bestehst, habe ich roundabout wieder eingetragen.
Peilscheibe (2018-03-27 08:58:03+00:00): Warum sollte man denn etwas als Kreisverkehr attributieren, was kein Kreisverkehr ist?
tag what you see

Das führt ja jede Auswertung in die Irre. Nehmen wir mal an, es würde jemand wissen wollen, wieviele Kreisverkehre im Landkreis X oder z. B. auch in Wilhlelmsdorf existieren - wäre das Ergebnis richtig oder falsch?

Für derartige runde Konstrukte, die kein Kreisverkehr sind, haben wir ein eigenes tag: junction=circular

@Gerold: was Du da zitierst, ist keine "OSM-Regelung". Die Methodik ist genau umgekehrt: das Wiki soll die geübte Mappingpraxis dokumentieren und eben kein Katalog von Vorschriften sein, wie etwas gemappt werden muss.
Akkurator (2018-03-27 21:58:07+00:00): Das ist meiner Erinnerung nach kein regulärer Kreisverkehr. Würde ich deswegen auch nicht als roundabout taggen. An die genaue Vorfahrtsregelung erinnere ich mich aber nicht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
Hjart (2017-10-26 12:12:48+00:00): Oishii var i forvejen markeret
nikolajsheller (2017-10-26 13:41:43+00:00): Oishii er flyttet, åbenbart. Jeg havde ikke set den anden lokation, den fjerner jeg lige.
Hjart (2017-10-26 13:43:38+00:00): Jeg har allerede fjernet din version. Den første var få meter fra der hvor du placerede din.
nikolajsheller (2017-10-26 13:48:39+00:00): Ok, tak. Det virker som om mit kort på osmand ikke er helt opdateret.
Hjart (2017-10-26 14:26:14+00:00): Den ( vores POI) blev flyttet 90 m 12. september, så hvis du ikke har opdateret kortet siden da ;-)
Af hensyn til historikken er det iøvrigt generelt at foretrække at flytte en POI fremfor at slette den gamle og lave en ny
nikolajsheller (2017-10-26 14:30:56+00:00): Ok, tak for info. Jeg flytter POIs fremover.
Mac_01 (2017-10-26 21:47:42+00:00): Hallo,

kleine Frage: 

Warum hast du bei Räubersried, Neuses das Attribut auf place:suburb geändert und Pruppach auf place:village ?

Aus meiner Sicht ist dies nicht korrekt.

Viele Grüße

Mac
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 08:57:41+00:00): Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53237975 is not oneway, and yet has restrictions that prevent going south?
Udi (2017-10-28 12:22:09+00:00): fixed. thank you!
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 14:05:49+00:00): You're welcome! But I still suspect something is wrong with the restriction relations. Take a look at:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535571059#map=19/31.90197/35.01021&layers=N
.
It has "no-u-turn" but it's a one-way so that's obvious. It also has a "no-straight-on" to the southern road, but it's a oneway which goes north so that's obvious too. Perhaps these restrictions aren't needed at all?
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 14:06:58+00:00): To be clear, the two strange restrictions are:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7683320
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7683319
Udi (2017-10-28 14:40:31+00:00): It's the first time I am working with restrictions... Is this better?
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 20:11:44+00:00): I thin I'd need to know more. Can explain  how the traffic works in the area?
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 20:11:50+00:00): think
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 20:12:09+00:00): spelling fix: I think I'd need to know more. Can you explain how the traffic works in the area?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-05 12:10:09+00:00): I deleted the restrictions relations for now because they are not mapped properly. If you explain what you've tried achieving I might be able to help and add them back.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:30:39+00:00): You requested a review of this change, so here we go.

This broadly looks pretty good. Local knowledge is good for OSM, and what it's all about. You've added a few important details to the pub. We don't need the description really, since no-one uses that. It's better to come up with proper tags to add that (There is a 'real_fire' tag which might be what you want https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:real_fire ). When you add a regular building you can press S (I think) and it'll make the angles 90degrees which is accurate and nice.

The biggest problem is that you've added this pub again later! In this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53263833 ) you add it again as a node (ie point). You shouldn't have it in twice, since then it looks like 2 pubs. If the pub takes up the whole building, then what you've done here is right, and you should delete the other one.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:35:53+00:00): (Oh, and welcome to OSM!)
bielebog (2017-10-26 20:55:09+00:00): Hat diese Hütte wirklich eine eigene Hausnummer? Im ALKIS ist nichts eingetragen.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:47:36+00:00): You requested a review, so here we are. Another good edit. Lots of good, local knowledge info added here.

Few points: The "operator" tag is really used for things like "What bank operates this ATM?" (Important for possible ATM fees), or "What bus company operates this route?". It's not really for the name of the people who run the shop. And it can be a little privacy invasive to put that in! :)

Again, adding extra details is better than putting things in the description. But putting it in the description is better than nothing, since it means someone else can fix it up later.

The phone number should be in international format, since OSM is a global database.

You have a bit too much info in the "addr:city" field. We can figure out it's in Co. Cork! TBH the only real useful address information is (if applicable) the street + number (or street + housename). But Irish addresses being what they are, that can be rare out in the country. If you know the Eircode, that's good to put in in the addr:postcode field.
woodpeck_repair (2017-10-26 12:43:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53241226, 53241366.
JJIglesias (2017-10-26 22:46:14+00:00): Gracias por editar en #OSM_BO
JJIglesias (2017-10-26 22:48:10+00:00): La Carniceria Shelele esta con Tag de Car Wash
y La Carnicerio Alejandrita parece estar correcta. Clarificar cual es cual
Gracias
Prusaker (2017-10-26 13:42:57+00:00): landuse=allotments используется преимущественно для обозначения "участков незастроенной земли, покрытой грядками, теплицами или засаженной плодовыми деревьями. На территории также могут присутствовать сараи для хранения инструмента или даже хижины, однако, такие участки в целом не используются для проживания" (цитата из вики). Если вы хотите обозначить известные вам границы земельных участков, то наверное будет лучше сделать это через тэг barrier=fence.
Prusaker (2017-10-26 13:44:07+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/53.81979/27.46360
В качестве примера использования barrier=fence. Я полагаю так будет правильнее.
Nakaner (2017-11-04 14:31:08+00:00): Hi Zverik,

your use of network=* is wrong. network=* is used to tag which Verkehrsverbund a route relation belongs to. There is no "Nuremberg S-Bahn" Verkehrsverbund, it is called "Verkehrsverbund Großraum Nürnberg". Could you please fix this?

Btw, light_rail is wrong for S-Bahn Nuremberg.

Best regards

Michael
Zverik (2017-11-05 13:13:28+00:00): Okay, I see U-Bahn and S-Bahn in relation names. Why are they not networks? Naming a "transport and tariff network" with a "network" in the title does not automatically make it a network in OSM terms, just like naming a cafe "restaurant" does not make it a restaurant, and unclassified highways are not really unclassified in many countries. VGN joins many networks: R-Bahn, S-Bahn, U-Bahn, trams and buses.  To me they definitely look different. Judging by a translation of the wiki page, it is more of a "parent operator" to operators of these networks, than a network itself.
Zverik (2017-11-05 13:16:03+00:00): Also, why light_rail is wrong for S-Bahn? It is definitely not a subway, and since it has short intervals, not a common train.
Zverik (2017-11-06 12:08:40+00:00): Michael, thank you for this extended explanation. I have learnt a lot from it. I agree that light_rail might be unacceptable for Nuremberg. I change these routes type to train, if the local community agrees with it.

As you might know, I've made a metro validator, which runs for the whole planet, including german cities. It filters networks to process by a "network" tag. If it is hard to impossible in Germany to use this tag alone to choose metro (U-Bahn and in a few cities, S-Bahn) routes, what should I use? Should I create a new tag, e.g. network:type=u-bahn etc.?
Nakaner (2017-11-06 13:35:29+00:00): route=* alone does not help (and network is useless). If you also check the first characters of the value of ref=*, you can guess pretty well the type of train. U-Bahn line numbers always starts with a "U", S-Bahn line numbers always start with an "S".

Many private railway companies which operate local trains as a contractor of a German state, don't use the train type abbreviations of Deutsche Bahn (RB, RE, IRE). That's why you have to check the second character, too. If it is a space or a digit, you have S-Bahn or U-Bahn. Otherwise it is the abbreviation of a company, e.g. UBB for "Usedomer Bäderbahn", STB for "Süd-Thüringen-Bahn" or SWGE for "Südwestdeutsche Verkehrs AG".

Some mappers add a space behind the U/S, some not.

Cologne/Bonn Stadtbahn which is partially a U-Bahn but a light rail/tram (and tram-train) outside the city centres, is not prefixed with an U.
Zverik (2017-11-09 13:47:25+00:00): Just reverted the network tag in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53639647
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-27 12:12:38+00:00): Hi harcher, welcome to OSM. You're new to the project and you created almost 280,000 map changes within 24h. Most of the data looks like an import. Could you describe your contributions? Thanks.
harcher (2017-10-27 13:33:04+00:00): Thank you, and of course. They are imports; we're doing a project that maps houses and other structures in Eastern Province to target inrdoor residual spraying for malaria. We've done similar work, but this is my first year on the project. Structures were drawn in QGIS using images from DigitalGlobe EV Webhosting as recently as September, and were cleaned for accuracy before being imported, and then compared to existing data to remove duplication in areas with existing house data. The project has quick turnaround times so we've done most importing in the last 24 hours, hence the high input. Another administrator recommended more detail in commenting, which was sacrificed initially in the interest of time, but I've tried to add it to the last few changesets.
harcher (2017-10-27 13:34:10+00:00): Also, I work for Akros Global Health, hence the Akros tag to help differentiate structures enumerated with the images we downloaded  with data previously existing in OSM.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:49:54+00:00): Review request, so here we go! Another good edit. Lots of local data here. Like the last edit, you don't really need the addr:city because of Irish addresses. It's good you added the community hall.
Omegatherion (2017-10-28 11:18:05+00:00): Bitte die direction bei den einzelnen Ampeln nicht vergessen.
simlox (2017-12-29 14:35:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Ampeln nochmals überprüft und gegebenenfalls Ergänzungen vorgenommen.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:51:39+00:00): Review requested, so here we go. Another good edit. Lots of nice detailed information, like contact details for phone & website. International phone numbers are best (I might go through and fix that up sometime)
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-27 12:14:32+00:00): Hi zchitoshi, welcome to OSM. You're new to the project and you created almost 260,000 map changes within 24h. Most of the data looks like an import. Could you describe your contributions? Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:55:25+00:00): Review requested, so here we go.

I'm not so sure about this edit. You've changed the "place" node, which is for, well, the village. Adding the Wikipedia link is fine. But the tourism tag is wrong. It's not for a listing of things that are available like that.

OSM Is geographical, so we're able to know that the copper mine musuem is in this village, so you don't need to add it. It's better to add the sandy beaches as beaches, likewise walks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-10-27 17:36:43+00:00): Hi,
you added several ways that look like boundaries, but have many strange tags that are not used anywhere. I'm also pretty sure that the source of this data is not a 'survey'. Please have a look and correct the tagging and give the real source of this data.

Thanks, Jan
bbroy13 (2017-10-28 09:01:38+00:00): Hi there, 
Thanks for your mail.  Actually before that day there was no proper administrative boundary of chittagong.  I got a admin a boundary from chittagong city corporation.  I tried to integrate that in osm server.  I thought its necessary to have proper admin boundary.  For accuracy issue this type of work will continue in future too. Please consider that
Have a nice day. 
Regards, 
Bidhan
mueschel (2017-10-28 12:50:33+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply. You say that you got some data from "chittagong city corporation". Did you check the license this data is subject to? All data has to fit to the ODbL of OSM, otherwise it can not be added.
Second, if you add data from an external source, you have to be aware of the OSM Import Guidelines as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Third, all these tags from your import should not appear in OSM, as they are no documented tags:
acc 	0
areaskm 	1.731162
bbscode 	20154117
distcode 	15
district 	Chittagong
divcode 	2
division 	Chittagong
fcode 	FA001
geocode 	2154117.0
nm3 	UNK
nm4 	UNK
objectid 	1114
select_ 	0
shape_area 	1.52E-4
shape_leng 	0.068216
subtypes 	0
ttt 	21541
unioncode 	17
unionname 	Ward - 17
upazila 	CCC (Bakalia)
usg 	0
uzcode 	41

Please remove them, or replace them by appropriate tags.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
kocio (2017-10-29 16:52:57+00:00): Hi, 

What are the trees in https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/29.97080/31.23068 ? Is this a landuse=orchard or natural=wood maybe?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-09 15:36:22+00:00): You requested a review, and I've covered it in the review of the other changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53262165 ), this node should probably be deleted
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
nurdafur (2018-04-10 07:55:24+00:00): Hallo Garmin33
Kannst du mir sagen, weshalb du die Regensbergbrücke in 2 Fahrtrichtungen aufgeteilt hast? Dies widerspricht den https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland
Ich denke, dass das im grossen und ganzen für die Schweiz identisch ist. Nur bei baulicher Trennung sollten separate Fahrspuren gezeichnet werden. Also eventuell im Bereich der Kreuzung mit der Hofwiesenstrasse.
Zudem solltest du darauf achten, dass es für cycleway auch die Optionen left beziehungsweise right gibt. Bei getrennt gezeichneten Fahrspuren entsprechend cycleway:right=Land
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen
Urs
SomeoneElse (2017-11-02 23:11:54+00:00): Hello, 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535616453 overlaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426382206 that was added a year ago.  There are some other similar overlaps nearby.
Best Regards,
Andy
harcher (2017-11-20 07:32:48+00:00): Good afternoon.

Could you please let me know which areas were reverted so I can look into them?

Thank you,
Helena
andrewwiseman (2018-03-30 19:38:36+00:00): Thanks for your mapping! You added a lot of features like restaurant, church, cafe, and so on but it looks like you were using Bing imagery. Have you been to this place? If not, please just map what you are sure of, like this is a building, rather than guessing what might be in the building. Thanks!