piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2022-11-14 08:44:21+00:00): Jag kan inte hålla med om att dessa vägar är servicevägar - dessutom går de över gc-vägar. Håller du med om detta? https://www.google.com/maps/@58.2598393,12.9573085,3a,69.1y,121.41h,82t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sEZ_QpmWm6DEdxkdARMS7ZQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DEZ_QpmWm6DEdxkdARMS7ZQ%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D68.00605%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
Dice PostNord (2022-11-14 10:00:05+00:00): Har ändrat nu. Men vid det sista huset där jag har ritat serviceväg, skall det vara parkeringsväg menar du? Tack för feedback.
archie (2022-11-14 10:35:55+00:00): Parkeringsväg bara vid större parkeringar. Serviceväg passar bra här. Tack!
felipeeugenio (2022-08-13 13:56:03+00:00): Hola. Creo que ya le hemos comentado esto, pero esos no son los nombres de los caminos. Son denominaciones para la mantención de los postes. Es posible que usted haya estado trabajando en coordinación con otras personas? porque este tipo de ediciones ya los habiamos visto.
saludos
ff5722 (2023-01-05 12:57:37+00:00): This road is under active construction, I don't understand why you change the tags, just search for pictures of '天山胜利隧道' and you will see there are three tubes under construction. I will revert these changes.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-16 13:33:13+00:00): Hi
Warum sind die Gebäude denn so unglaublich windschief?
Im editor gibt es die Funktion "rechtwinklig machen": Einen Weg (Way) auswählen durch anklicken und dann die Taste "Q" drücken. Macht ein schönes Rechteck.
Auch hier: Adressen nicht in das Feld "name" eintragen.
Name nur, wenn es ein "richtiger" Name ist. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

-silversurfer83
AlaskaDave (2025-11-02 06:02:29+00:00): Hi,
I was looking at route 1090 in Tak Province beyond Umphang. You upgraded the last part of that road to a secondary highway and added ref:1090  all the way to its end in the wildlife preserve. However, a quick check on Google Streetview shows it as only a rough track quite a distance north of the road end.
I'm trying to understand why you upgraded that part of the highway.

Thanks,
Dave
Nithinat S (2025-11-02 07:12:10+00:00): I checked 1090 in the DoH database.
https://roadnet3.doh.go.th/
The length of 1090 is around 218 kilometers, and it ends around where it is currently in the OSM.

I understand that a dirt road may not look appropriate, but the current wiki guidelines state that all 4-digit national highways are secondary (if they do not match the higher criteria), therefore this is an upgrade to comply with the guidelines.

Regards.
AlaskaDave (2025-11-02 08:18:35+00:00): Sorry, my bad. You did not set  the highway=secondary but did add the ref:1090 to the unclassified section I'm referring to
AlaskaDave (2025-11-02 08:43:22+00:00): I understand that about dirt roads. Seems like bad reasoning to me but I accept it.
However,  I checked https://roadnet3.doh.go.th/ and determined that the end of 1090 is actually here:
15.7244366, 99.0181376
not at the end of the mapped OSM way.
 I then demoted that last section to an unpaved  track.
Nithinat S (2025-11-02 12:31:19+00:00): Ah, thanks for clarifying. Got it.
I'm not sure because it was a long time ago, but I reviewed the details of this edit and found that I might added the ref according to roadnet but left one section unclassified as is, possibly because to the smoothness that overrules the secondary classification, according to the wiki.
By the satellite image, I'm not sure which its current smoothness is, but it looks decent, thus upgrading it to the end of the 1090 to secondary reasonable?
By the way, thanks for changing that section to unpaved track.
AlaskaDave (2025-11-02 13:12:26+00:00): I tagged 1090 as unpaved from the gate at the Hung-Yai Naresuan East Wildlife Sanctuary all the way to the end because the imagery in both Google Maps and ESRI World seemed to suggest it.
Nithinat S (2025-11-03 04:16:48+00:00): Looks good. Thanks
eggie (2022-08-11 20:33:26+00:00): Formeel correct.. Een straatnaam zie ik ook niet in de BGT.
gr eggie
highflyer74 (2022-08-23 08:28:54+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Sei so nett, keine Daten einzutragen, welche nicht in die OSM Datenbank gehören. OSM ist eine globale Geodatenbank, die von sehr vielen Menschen genutzt wird.

Für den vermutlich beabsichtigen Zweck deiner Eintragung eignen sich Dienste wie z.B. https://umap.openstreetmap.de/, welche auf OSM basieren. Hier kannst du eigene Karten gestalten, ohne die Datenbank zu verändern.

Falls du weitere Fragen hast, melde dich gern direkt hier im Änderungssatz. Danke!
eggie (2022-08-11 20:31:59+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer er aan het begin een bord woonerf staat heb je het formeel correct gedaan. 

Groet,
eggie
silversurfer83 (2022-08-16 13:27:31+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)
nach Anzahl deiner Änderungen bist Du ja noch recht neu, daher möchte ich Dich zunächst begrüßen.

Nun ein paar Hinweise, uA zu deinen Änderungen bei den Adressen:
Wenn du im Editor (du hast iD genutzt) Daten eingibst, hast du bei Objekttyp und den Datenfeldern darunter immer rechts ein kleines "i" welches du anklicken kannst und das dich dann ins Wiki zu einer Seite mit der entsprechen Info, wie die Gemeinschaft hier die Daten am liebsten angegeben haben möchte, bringt. Beim Thema Adressen landest du beispielsweise auf dieser Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*

Häuser bekommen nur in seltenen Fällen einen eigenen Namen, so wie du das hier gemacht hast. Das sollte also geändert werden.

Grundsätzlich ist es nie verkehrt sich zunächst ein wenig im Wiki einzulesen und dann mit der Arbeit zu beginnen.
Gute Startpunkte sind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Falls Fragen sind hilft die Gemeinschaft sehr gerne auf einem der vielen Chatkanäle:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Weiter frohes Mappen
silversurfer83
M!dgard (2022-08-11 11:05:48+00:00): This wrong tag was created by a wrong preset in the MapComplete editor, which has since been fixed.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-11 22:32:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kepivar (2022-08-11 12:26:32+00:00): Please translate "hotosm-project-12611" into a meaningful description of your changeset.
kepivar (2022-08-11 12:24:53+00:00): - is not a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
wireguy (2022-08-12 10:11:38+00:00): steve,  this is a live system, not a test.  please remove your test objects.
wireguy (2022-08-12 10:11:04+00:00): steve,  this is a live system, not a test.  please remove your test objects.
woodpeck (2022-08-11 11:54:54+00:00): Bitte Diskussion in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869330 beachten!
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Oreg2 (2022-08-17 11:55:15+00:00): Ciao Martino, this is a huge change set which makes it hard to understand what happened. Among other things you seem to have:

- deleted the existing Via Panoramica / Sentiero Panoramico (relation 14414965) and replaced it with two different ones (relations 14449306 and 14449302);
- reduced the main Via Bregaglia (relation 14414854) from 110 segments to 1, essentially deleting it;
- dropped and changed tags from Via Bregaglia - Variante (relation 14425116) and changed the set of members;
- dropped tags from the Bondo variant of Via Bregaglia (relation 14425264)
- introduced several additional variants of Via Bregaglia;
- modified hundreds of ways and nodes and touched several additional relations.

Can you please comment on what you tried to do here and why? Also, any additional information on your sources would be helpful. Thanks, Oreg2.
user_10901495 (2022-08-18 09:35:12+00:00): [I followed this when creating variants, and when determining startpoints and endpoints](https://www.bregaglia.ch/images/VIA--BREGAGLIA.jpg)

In the rest I simply tidied up all the different relations, creating a relation for the official routes of Switzerland and a relation for informal routes that encompass also the italian part of these official routes.
I.e. the italian part of Via Bregaglia does not have any ref number, but the swiss part, that goes from Maloja to Soglio, has an official number and is part of the official footpaths of Switzerland.
I created a relation for the swiss official footpath and a relation for the Via Bregaglia as a whole.
Oreg2 (2022-08-19 13:21:39+00:00): Thanks for the quick answer.

From your answer I understand that one of the two "Sentiero Panoramico" is an informal one. Do you have a source for this one? There are no signposts along the way after Soglio, are there?

(The Via Bregaglia actually doesn't have a number on the Swiss side, either. I guess you meant the Via Panoramica.)

The new Via Bregaglia variants you introduced are actually only dotted lines on your source map, indicating that they are not part of the official Via. I'm almost certain that they are not signposted as part of the Via.

More fundamentally, why did you decide to delete the existing relations (Via Panoramica and Via Bregaglia) rather than modify them? What do you mean by "tidied up" – what exactly did you change? What was wrong with the relations you deleted? They were based on surveys, GPS traces and current information from the responsible tourist office. Your source is only a schematic map that doesn't even include the Bondo variant. Can you help me understand how the new relations are an improvement over the deleted ones?
user_10901495 (2022-08-20 10:03:27+00:00): <There are no signposts along the way after Soglio, are there?>
Yes there are signposts that have written "Sentiero panoramico" on them, and moreover I followed the map from my first answer that shows that that path goes from Casaccia to Prosto.

<(The Via Bregaglia actually doesn't have a number on the Swiss side, either. I guess you meant the Via Panoramica.)>
Yes it has a number, it is simply not shown on the guideposts, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Bregaglia

<They were based on surveys, GPS traces and current information from the responsible tourist office.>
I changed only the relations, I didn't change any actual segment of the routes, so this point doesn't make sense.

<Your source is only a schematic map that doesn't even include the Bondo variant>
How is this relevant, I didn't delete the Bondo variant, even if it was not shown on the map.

<The new Via Bregaglia variants you introduced are actually only dotted lines on your source map, indicating that they are not part of the official Via.> 
Precisely because of that I didn't added them to the official Via, but I added new relations describing that they were variants; I don't know if they have any official status, but if they are shown on that map it doesn't seem too nonsensical to insert them on OpenStreetMap.

Two other things: the map comes from the website bregaglia.ch, that is the official tourism website for the Val Bregaglia, so nothing particularly untrustworthy, and, just to be precise, I deleted only one relation.
That one relation was the italian Via Bregaglia segment, as there is no such thing as the italian Via Bregaglia segment, there is only the Via Bregaglia as whole and the officially-sanctioned Maloja-Soglio segment.

I hope I made myself clear.
Oreg2 (2022-09-16 11:48:46+00:00): A month later, I guess because the changeset is so huge the discussion got too complex to keep your attention. To simplify things, here's what I'd suggest:
*1* I don't mind that you deleted the Via Bregaglia that followed the bregaglia.ch website (relation 14414854) as that site is contradictory, unreliable and there is reason to believe their maps are incorrect. Let's delete the remaining segment as well.
*2* I'm fine with leaving your new "Sentiero Panoramico" (relation 14449306). It would be nice to have a source.
*3* Before further changes make that impossible, I've restored the Via Panoramica as signposted, surveyed and confirmed by the official SvizzeraMobile website.
*4* The new "Via Panoramica" (relation 14449302) is actually the first part of Via Bregaglia (relation 14425116), which is not the same. It should be dropped. (It is tagged in the valley and hence not panoramic whereas the actual Via Panoramica leads up the mountain side.)
*5* The correct tags of Via Bregaglia should be restored.
*6* Routes should be named only if an official name is signposted on the ground. Keep the route in any case, just without a name. The oscm:name tag can be used to describe it instead.
Source: survey, signposts on the ground, confirmed by https://www.schweizmobil.ch/it/svizzera-a-piedi/percorsi/route-0796.html
Frans S (2022-09-17 10:54:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
 Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building and tagged building=yes. Not as landuse=residential for small clusters and single buildings. Land use should be drawn around settlement, villages etc.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124772626
John Sinclair (2022-08-11 11:51:12+00:00): Oops, Northgate!
rskedgell (2023-01-17 08:26:16+00:00): Is the entire length of the kerb w933011649 really lowered? How could you possibly tell from Bing aerial imagery?
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
archie (2022-08-29 16:41:13+00:00): Den här vägen leder till flera fastigheter/bostäder. Varför har du taggat den som "service=driveway"?
stuff62 POSTNORD (2022-08-30 06:16:48+00:00): Har ändrat till bostadsgata
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
infeeeee (2022-08-20 15:10:29+00:00): Hello
In this changeset you created some strange multipoligon "parks". Are you sure this is the correct tag? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
streckenkundler (2022-08-25 19:43:16+00:00): Hei,

Frage: ist die Bahnstraße in dem Abschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129486883  wirklich komplett Einbahnstraße incl. Fahrrad? Ich frage deshalb, weil die Knotenpunktnetzwerkanalyse für die Route 30<->32 deswegen einen Fehler anzeigt: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/7787226 
Auf älteren Mapillary-Bildern ist dir keine Einbahnstraße zu sehen. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1173053329808661

Über den Abschnitt verlaufen auch weitere Radwegrouten: Elbe-Müritz-Rundweg, Historische Stadtkerne 3, Havel-Radweg. Sowas ist immer Bidirektional.

Anderenfalls wären die begleitenden Wege mit highway=footway + bicycle=yes entsprechend zu erfassen. Vergleiche Beschilderung.

Danke und Grüße,

Sven
SurlyRider (2022-08-26 07:43:05+00:00): Die verkehrsrechtliche Anordnung wurde im Frühjahr 2022 geändert.
Die Bahnstrasse ist von "Am Stern" bis Einmündung Wilhelmstrasse jetzt Einbahnstrasse. Aufhebung des vorhandenen vbB
Freigabe für den Radverkehr ist auf der Fahrbahn (noch....) nicht vorhanden.

Die Freigabe der Gehwege (239+1022-10) ist jedenfalls jeweils in fahrtrichtung rechts (wieder) vorhanden
streckenkundler (2022-08-26 16:59:41+00:00): Hei,

vielen Dank für den Vor-Ort-Blick... Die einschlägigen Einbahnstraßenschilder haben aber kein Zusatzzeichen 1022-10? Sowas wird ja auch sehr gerne gemacht, dann bräuchte der Straßenabschnitt nur oneway:bicycle=no...

Dann werde ich mich mal bei Gelegenheit ans Apassen der Relationen machen...

Sven
streckenkundler (2022-08-27 17:10:54+00:00): Hei, ich hab das mal angepasst und die Routen angepasst... Ich weiß nur nicht, was mit den sidewalk:bicycle ist. Das war eigentlich eh mehrheitlich Quatsch, da deutlich ersichtlich ist, daß durch Bäume, Parktaschen, Lampen, ect. eine deutliche bauliche Trennung besteht und solche Wege dann besser separat erfasst werden sollten.

CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125450329

Danke,

Sven
SurlyRider (2022-08-28 20:21:51+00:00): die Wege selbst hab ich gelassen als "Bestand", wollte da nicht zu sehr herumeditieren.
Die Einbahnstraße ist definitiv nicht freigegeben für den Radverkehr in Gegenrichtung. Auseinandersetzung mit Straßenverkehrsbehörde beim Landkreis dazu läuft aber.
streckenkundler (2022-08-28 20:27:25+00:00): Hei, 

Danke! Ich hab ja die Radrouten auf neuerfasste begleitende Wege gelegt.  Das dürfte im Moment das einzig probate Mittel sein.  Wir beobachten mal. Schreibe mal, wenn es Neuigkeiten gibt.  

Grüße aus dem Spreewald,  
Sven
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
eggie (2022-08-11 12:55:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het Kulturhaus Vorden staat al op de kaart. De tagging staat op het gebouw zelf Ik zal wat samenvoegen met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
René Deliege (2022-08-11 13:46:44+00:00): Voor de duidelijkheid: Welzijn Vorden is niet hetzelfde als het Kulturhus.
Het betreft hier een dorpscentrum (=Kulturhus) met meerdere "inwonende" organisaties:
- Welzijn Vorden
- Museum Achterhoekse Schilderkunst
- Bibliotheek Vorden (staat nog fout op oude locatie).
eggie (2022-08-11 14:00:25+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-08-11 15:13:00+00:00): Tip.. Van de adresnode van de bieb haal je de biebinfo af. Dan houd je de adresnode intact. Dan uit de editmodus en ga je naar de nieuwe locate en tag je de info weer bij op de reeds aanwezige adesnode.
Het beste gaat dat met een reguliere editor als josm of iD.
Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
Commodoortje (2022-08-13 21:51:29+00:00): Paar kleine aanpassingen verricht, Bibliotheek Vorden inmiddels (veel te laat) verhuist.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-10 10:23:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9947347271 - can you edit it so it will list actual business name?
Aleksandar1994 (2022-11-10 10:53:18+00:00): It's fixed. Thank you on your help. #MapBuilder #MSFTOpenMaps
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
Chincha1 (2022-08-20 05:49:18+00:00): Hi Blog_dash, I strongly disagree with the classification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124774908
Blog_dash (2022-08-22 13:05:53+00:00): Hi Chincha1,

Thanks for reaching out. I have provided the classification as Residential in compliance with the Eastern Africa highway tagging guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa). Kindly let me know if you have any other thoughts or information about this way.
Chincha1 (2022-08-22 13:53:45+00:00): hi Blog,
Thanks for clarification ,  but my intention is to provide connectivity, the way ended is  inappropriate
Blog_dash (2022-08-23 13:38:21+00:00): Thanks for your clarification, Chincha1. I have provided the connectivity.
letihu (2022-10-01 18:50:04+00:00): Hallo,
verbinde bitte nicht die Straßen mit dem Wasserläufen. Der Fußweg geht dort über eine Brücke. Diese solltest du hinzufügen.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
user_5359 (2022-08-13 06:59:46+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key WIMS_FID? What is the source and license of this information.
For better understanding a name like ref:GB:WIMS is target leading.
Jez Nicholson (2022-08-13 13:40:18+00:00): I know of WIMS from the EA Water Quality Archive https://environment.data.gov.uk/water-quality/ which gives sampling points and readings for this Sewage Treatment Works (STW).

More than happy to have EA identifiers on here, but I echo the request to consider namespacing the id to ref:GB:... as it isn't International. 'WIMS' could be a system in Germany about something else.. also, is there a public URL to query High Wycombe STW itself?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124812258 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.