piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Filip009 (2022-04-11 20:42:33+00:00): But OpenStreetMap are trying to catch the reality, not books ;)
And do you think it is mapped correctly? Because I don't think. Considering https://www.freemap.sk/?map=16/48.157770/19.897614&layers=X&line=48.166312/19.898745%2C48.164812/19.899290%2C48.164708/19.899275%2C48.164659/19.899116%2C48.164599/19.899051%2C48.164427/19.899041%2C48.164285/19.899165%2C48.164178/19.899483%2C48.164009/19.899613%2C48.163570/19.899809%2C48.163439/19.899868%2C48.163359/19.899859%2C48.163284/19.899904%2C48.163266/19.899998%2C48.163247/19.900078%2C48.163237/19.900219%2C48.163190/19.900241%2C48.163134/19.900167%2C48.163058/19.899978%2C48.163010/19.899949%2C48.162937/19.899984%2C48.162955/19.900123%2C48.162896/19.900178%2C48.162844/19.900108%2C48.162085/19.899908%2C48.162062/19.900022%2C48.161762/19.900259%2C48.161715/19.900085%2C48.161619/19.900022%2C48.161482/19.900057%2C48.161383/19.900139%2C48.161279/19.900072%2C48.161128/19.900116%2C48.161082/19.900290%2C48.160898/19.900644%2C48.160974/19.900817%2C48.160911/19.900947%2C48.160789/19.900966%2C48.160589/19.901098%2C48.160328/19.901187%2C48.160168/19.901332%2C48.160079/19.901348%2C48.159995/19.901458%2C48.159991/19.901521%2C48.160005/19.901588%2C48.159607/19.901880%2C48.158436/19.902459%2C48.157952/19.902572%2C48.157210/19.902996%2C48.156991/19.902850%2C48.156858/19.902784%2C48.156741/19.902778%2C48.156680/19.902850%2C48.156633/19.903046%2C48.156534/19.903182%2C48.156474/19.903322%2C48.154274/19.904530%2C48.154151/19.904415%2C48.154101/19.904450%2C48.154120/19.904590%2C48.154253/19.904800%2C48.154244/19.904883%2C48.154153/19.904825%2C48.154105/19.904822%2C48.154192/19.905146%2C48.154201/19.905349%2C48.154098/19.905465%2C48.154049/19.905333%2C48.153933/19.905140%2C48.153724/19.904999%2C48.153465/19.905006%2C48.153238/19.905130%2C48.153084/19.905239%2C48.153005/19.905335%2C48.152899/19.905318%2C48.152791/19.905405%2C48.152785/19.905290%2C48.152719/19.905176%2C48.152378/19.905383 here you can see, that that path is going up and down from the valley to the top again and again.
Filip009 (2022-04-11 20:44:46+00:00): Here is the picture showing elevation profile https://ibb.co/r4cM6dv
später77 (2022-04-11 21:22:07+00:00): I slightly corrected the route, but it is actually accurate. I did this trip in January 2022, it is tricky to catch the exact route because of the rough és savage terrain. And yes, it is that hilly. Valleys in a row. The border line does not consider the terrain. Catch it out, it is worth it.
Filip009 (2022-04-11 21:31:59+00:00): Okay, now I trust, that it is well mapped.
Alex_457 (2022-02-15 15:20:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Is there a reason you have deleted the trees here? Also, I'd recommend reading this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
Alex_457 (2022-02-15 15:28:09+00:00): height=0 and wall=noise_barrier also don't make sense on the wall. I understand this is the first edit though so I assume these were probably mistakes.
Ritler Antonio (2022-02-15 17:26:51+00:00): Realmente!
Ritler Antonio (2022-02-15 17:27:25+00:00): Realmente!
wkdgs (2022-02-15 10:16:03+00:00): Sieht gut aus. 

Falls es sich um zwei Doppelhaushälften handelt, kannst du dafür noch einen spezifischeren Tag auswählen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dhouse
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117408734
Aiber (2022-02-15 12:37:56+00:00): Danke! den spezifischen Tag kannte ich bisher nicht!
Im vorliegenden Fall ist er zwar nicht so richtig passend, aber in Tausenden von anderen Fällen.
Aiber (2022-02-15 12:38:40+00:00): Oh, hab mich im Haus geirrt. Hier ist er ja durchaus passend!
Jerry_W2k (2022-02-14 20:05:18+00:00): źródła: Geoportal 2: Orthophotomap (aerial image) WMS; Działki ewidencyjne z powiatów; KIEG: Budynki; Forest database BDoL (overlay)
balchen (2023-04-21 06:45:10+00:00): Samme kommentar som forrige ang. 822420069, som også er en bro, men står med tunnel=yes?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:21:56+00:00): Пътищата са върнати в промяна 118778785
RuffLayers4 (2022-02-16 20:17:09+00:00): Comment should have been, "Edited restriction in AlphaGreen. #adt," source used was Maxar Premium Imagery and Mapillary.
Lee Carré (2022-02-15 07:58:09+00:00): Looks like they're mostly done, and finishing up.

I'll keep checking in the coming weeks.
HenriqueSousa (2022-02-23 16:31:23+00:00): Por que você excluiu todas as áreas urbanas que eu havia mapeado??
Gustavo22Soares (2022-02-23 17:26:49+00:00): Olá Henrique, por que o us da tag  landuse=residential (Área Residencial) no Brasil deve ser usada para condomínio, conjuntos habitacionais, desenvolvimentos imobiliários, glebas, favelas ou ocupações não para definir quarteirões ou outras áreas urbanas nesse caso o recomendado é mapear as edificações caso tenha mais alguma duvida estou aqui
m@rio (2022-02-14 21:39:40+00:00): Cześć bartekz,
w zestawie zmian 117410543 usunąłeś częściowo dwa adresy: Jerzykowo Okrężna 37 i 41.
Prośba o info co do przyczyny, bo w emuia sobie figurują.

pzdr
m@rio
bartekz (2022-02-15 06:15:15+00:00): Hej, bardzo przepraszam ale adresy zostały usunięte przypadkowo, już przywracam.
m@rio (2022-02-15 11:24:37+00:00): Jasne, nie ma problemu, dzięki!
SherbetS (2022-02-27 04:02:03+00:00): thank you!
Trevor_1 (2022-02-27 04:12:08+00:00): You're welcome! 👍
user_5359 (2022-02-15 11:19:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on your four buildings with the tag building:yes=GB:544.2;GB:528 (example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031417076). What is the meaning of this tag?
TomsDad (2022-02-15 12:55:16+00:00): Ouch - you're right - that was a mistake. I am adding a few road signs in this road - which follow the structure of "traffic_sign=GB:956" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign) - but that looked like a cut-n-paste error, now removed!
Axelos (2023-04-02 16:58:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour info,

La boutique en question concernant ce panneau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9506046081) a déménagé.

Axel.
pio2_122 (2022-02-15 10:01:52+00:00): To skrzyżowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.18864&mlon=16.16976#map=19/54.18864/16.16976 - zostało błędnie rozrysowane.
W OSM przyjęło się, że nie rozrysowujemy poszczególnych kierunków jeżeli droga jest jednojezdniowa. Wyjątkiem są tylko sytuacje, gdy na jezdni występują przeszkody „uniemożliwiające fizycznie łamanie podwójnej ciągłej (wysepki, krawężniki, tablice odblaskowe separujące pasy o przeciwnych kierunkach ruchu)” - źródło https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Drogi_dwujezdniowe. W tym przypadku nic takiego nie występuje.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 18:53:12+00:00): You accidentally mapped an area as a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117411570
lapushkin (2022-02-14 21:40:27+00:00): JOSM ругается, говорит, что кончается где-то не там. Проверьте, умоляю
pio2_122 (2022-02-14 22:18:01+00:00): Dlaczego to rondo zostało rozrysowane, a nazwa zmieniona na "Rondo 100-lecia Praw Kobiet22"?

Oznaczenie tego ronda jako punkt z tagiem highway=mini_roundabout było prawidłowe. Była tam zresztą stosowna informacja w postaci tagu note="Jest to mini rondo z przejezdną wyspą centralną - nie rozrysowywać! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini_roundabout".
emvee (2022-05-07 10:35:38+00:00): Hi,

Restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13804593 has no type, restriction=""

Not sure what it should be, can you correct it?

Thanks
uprkos (2023-06-13 19:28:59+00:00): Dot. 446581737
Przy wjeździe na teren tych garaży od strony Lotniczej jest znak B-1 z tabliczką "Nie dotyczy służb miejskich i dojeżdżających do garaży i posesji". Od strony Narzymskiego jest B-2. Czy w takim razie access nie powinien być vehicle=private, bez bicycle=yes?
YomanNH (2023-06-13 20:20:14+00:00): W takiej sytuacji rzeczywiście bicycle=yes jest błędne. Usunąłem ten tag. Nie zmieniłem access=private na vehicle=private, bo zgodnie z tą rozpiską: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access oznaczałoby to, że można wjechać tam konno, co nie jest prawdą ;)
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-15 06:48:00+00:00): Jei tai dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takas, tai turėtų būti žymimas highway=path+foot=designated+bicycle=designated, plačiau čia: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
Niiepce (2022-02-24 12:02:35+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für die Aktualisierung verschiedener Tags der Wanderwegrelation Naturpfad. Ich habe ein kleinen Tippfehler, der dir unterlaufen ist, korrigiert. Sonst sahen die Änderungen aber gut aus. :)
BS97n (2022-02-18 21:03:24+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei OSM! Schön dass du mitmachst.

Mit historic=monument ist eher sowas hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25012741 gemeint. So ein kleines Denkmal taggt man eher so: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:memorial
Ich weiß, dass die Übersetzung im Editor nicht immer ganz eindeutig ist, deshalb hab ich das am Anfang auch oft verwechselt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117412580
eggie (2022-02-15 09:44:48+00:00): Dag frankrolf.. Je vraagt feedback..
Na het hek zou dit deel van het fietspad ook access=private kunnen krijgen.
MVG
eggie
frankrolf (2022-02-15 11:28:30+00:00): Dankjewel, ik dacht al dat dat misschien kan, maar vond het niet …
Daarom vroeg ik feedback :-)
myfirstnameispaul (2022-02-15 00:17:36+00:00): This is a commercial building and I can't figure out how to change it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
JeroenHoek (2022-02-15 11:19:38+00:00): Zou je in je changeset comments kunnen toelichten wat je doet?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 10:28:04+00:00): this may be silly legal situation, but are you sure that cycling at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011886862 segment is forbidden?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 10:28:52+00:00): Form looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011886862/history this specific pavement is claimed to be signed as place with legal cycling
Pete Owens (2022-02-16 13:07:39+00:00): The context here is that there is a S-N cycle route (The Sankey Valley Trail) that crosses Liverpool Road at this point. There is refuge some distance to the east:
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3840854,-2.625147,3a,75y,105.48h,92.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0lmA7JTsCVLR3oB2gtDv2g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
so the council recommends that cyclists and pedestrians divert along Liverpool Road, cross at the refuge and walk back. See this sign on the approach from the south:
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3839888,-2.6254958,3a,27.4y,7.87h,88.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWBaQ5u80zozL1uCMkcQc8w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Of course everybody simply ignores the sign and crosses directly (the council simply doesn't understand pedestrian desire lines) - and certainly cyclists were not going to get off and walk - which used to be the case:
http://wcc.crankfoot.xyz/facility-of-the-month/February2010.htm
so they put up signs to allow cyclists to ride on the pavement from the Sankey Valley Trail to the refuge and back. (though neither the refuge nor the pavement not the refuge are suitable for cycling).  The signage refers to this stretch.

Now you can't put the sign in the middle of the road - it either has to be before the cycleway starts (as in this case) or after it starts. In either case it is absurd to map the cycleway from the location of the sign rather than the junction (in one case you end up with a short stub in the other you end up with a disconnected route).

Exactly the same is true for a one-way street meeting a main road. The No Entry signs are not placed on the centre line of the main road, but a shot distance along the one-way side road - but you map the whole side road as one-way - all the way to the junction; not a short stub of two way street as just as far as the sign.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-05 13:41:09+00:00): The discussion on talk-gb seemed to suggest that in this particular case these _are_ signed as cycleways, no matter how bonkers that sign placement actually is, so "cycleway" is actually correct here.
kukułka (2022-02-15 19:33:56+00:00): Ta zmiana jest niedobra. Pomnik jest przesunięty w stronę morza, bo to Pomnik Polski Morskiej i chodnik odpowiednio też  (np. wg ścieżki dotykowej). Poprzednio było dobrze, teraz wschodnia część chodnika przechodzi przez pomnik
mapowicz_pl (2022-02-15 20:25:25+00:00): Dzieki za zwrocenie uwagi. Miales racje. Poprawilem juz. Powinno byc juz dobrze. Uzylem orto z geoportalu.
Glassman (2022-02-16 18:54:29+00:00): If the trails exist they will likely be added back by another mapper. Instead of deleting them, it's better to add the tag access=no (or whatever is appropriate.) access=no will prevent routers from suggesting the trail.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117413604
maro21 (2022-02-22 18:26:01+00:00): Skąd to przypisanie adresów? Tylko budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031498248 ma adres, a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101662095 jest bez adresu? I czy na pewno building=retail tu pasuje? W całym budynku jest handel? Wygląda na kamienicę.
maraf24 (2022-02-22 20:22:49+00:00): Coś poszło nie tak, powinno być dokładnie na odwrót.
philippec (2022-03-12 22:01:53+00:00): Zaventem Ringbaan.
Het maakt in dit geval geen verschil uit, maar wij geven indien mogelijk  de voorkeur aan de GRB laag.
Der Bierpuncheur (2022-03-12 22:05:53+00:00): My Flemish is poor, I’ll reply in English. I understand the layer preference, however, the actual track on ground was consistently off by about 10m. After updating the track position, I downloaded an updated OSM map, and went back and rode there F3 (Ringbaan) and it is matching to the GPS position.
wilda69 (2022-08-28 12:24:46+00:00): Is this still current?
user_5359 (2022-03-06 12:00:23+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag Approvissionnement = autres or somagep? What is the difference to the key approvissionnement (here also the value SOMAGEP)?

Did you know the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes ?
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 20:17:55+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OSM, j'ai corrigé dans OSM la manière de cartographier. Tu as mis aussi une hauteur de 3m, est ce la hauteur sous plafond ou hauteur du bati que tu as souhaité indiqué?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117414050
mariotomo (2022-02-15 17:03:28+00:00): Hi daGreif. you have just visited the area, right? do you think you could be even more helpful, and be more specific than "natural=fell"?
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/545#issuecomment-98479426

anyhow, thanks a lot for your refinements.
user_14145330 (2022-02-15 22:53:42+00:00): maybe natural=fell would also be suitable, what do you think?
mariotomo (2022-02-16 15:40:53+00:00): as far as I understood, having quickly tried to read the discussion around the tagging and rendering of natural=fell, the community seems to have decided that natural=fell is a generic tagging, and the "carto" team does has decided not to render it. My impression is that they prefer that we be more specific, as argued in the above linked github comment.
I don't have a strong opinion on this, I just notice that the area isn't rendered, and I guess that better no rendering than the previous situation which you corrected.
user_14145330 (2022-02-16 18:17:57+00:00): Suggestion as with Mount Fuji scree https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988579817 In many countries where areas are already very well mapped, it is quite common to leave mountain peaks unrendered.

Basically, in OpenStreetMap, every country can decide such things for itself to a certain extent. So only as a suggestion from me.
mariotomo (2022-02-16 19:42:28+00:00): ... you see, i've not been there, i'm glad that you share your observations with the OSM community. i was alerting you about the limited acceptation of the value fell for the tag natural. 
hope you didn't again meet a vast not accessible private area!
enjoy your adventure!
user_14145330 (2022-02-19 08:48:05+00:00): I stumbled across an interesting new method of mapping otherwise inaccessible regions thanks to your suggestion. There are many Youtube influencers today who post legitimate detailed videos of their ventures. Their publications are subject to strict rules, which is why we can safely use their imagery for mapping in OpenStreetMap. This gives us OpenSource Mappers an interesting opportunity to get geographic details of nature from regions that normal people would otherwise never be able to reach due to lack of time and resources. https://youtu.be/m_HojT7P6Kc
user_14117678 (2022-02-15 06:14:24+00:00): Proszę zapoznaj się z definicją parku (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:leisure%3Dpark) i zaprzestań dodawania leisure=park do każdego trawnika. Changeset zrevertowałem ze względu na fałszywe informacje i wandalizm dobrze zmapowanych obiektów.
Cristoffs (2022-02-21 15:47:32+00:00): Proszę opisuj swoje zestawy w inny sposób. I tak jak Jurakk napisał zapoznaj się z sposobem oznaczania parku
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 20:19:55+00:00): l'information était sur le bati et un point,  j'ai supprimé le point pour éviter de surcharger la base, pas ebsoin de mettre l'info 2 fois ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117414112
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:30:45+00:00): Na podstawie jakich źródeł ta edycja została wykonana?
user_14117678 (2022-02-15 16:36:01+00:00): Wiedza lokalna/wizyta na miejscu
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 20:29:49+00:00): attention a ne pas déplacer de routes quand tu dessines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117414222
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 18:48:27+00:00): Please don't use building tag to map other objects
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117414680
gpserror (2022-02-15 00:53:19+00:00): ack.  too far apart.  sigh, should save individually...
nitram1234 (2022-02-16 09:50:19+00:00): Hello friend! Great to see you working on areas in both Somalia and the United States. For the next time, please try to upload/submit the edit for each area separately. This way you won't produce a bounding box that covers Northern Africa as well as the Atlantic and half of North America. Cheers!
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-02-17 10:13:30+00:00): Hello,
regarding the old Kismayo runway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031511491
it seems not operating anymore.
If so, should be better map it as disused:aeroway=runway

Feel free to contact me by message,
thank you.

Alessandro
DressyPear4 (2022-02-15 21:24:16+00:00): Olá, balão de retorno geralmente é apenas no final de vias residenciais, nesses das rodovias não vai informação no nó.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117415078
Drigobarreto (2022-02-22 00:54:18+00:00): O erro foi percebido e corrigido. Obrigado.
Warin61 (2022-10-31 06:17:02+00:00): Hi
If you use the DCS Base Map you can find the names of these .. tracks.. highway=track for these - dashed lines on road = track, solid lines on road =unclassified.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-02-15 04:39:59+00:00): Hi, please see this lengthy discussion about place names in New Zealand, where it was decided that the official name should be used: https://lists.osm.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2021/thread.html#318 

In this case, the official name is Whangārei, as per https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/48143

P.s. the spelling on every sign in my local area was changed to Whangārei over the past 3 months
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-17 07:06:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651575252/history - is there a fuel station here?
RedChevy (2022-02-17 15:45:43+00:00): Yes, there is. I'm marking it as "Texaco Gas Station" and then adding shop=convenience because there's a convenience store inside. Is the right approach?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-18 01:20:14+00:00): it is a bit better to map separely

- fuel station (amenity=fuel area or point + additional tags)
- shop (the same)
- building area

I just did it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117543096

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9515279587 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032743483 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651575252
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 13:29:25+00:00): Ao meu ver desta forma não ficou bom, Sem Nome ( Rua F) ? Deixe só rua F ou então sem nada no nome
wiclef (2022-04-17 14:12:07+00:00): Eu nasci em jacaracanga e essas ruas no mapa oficial da prefeitura estão denominadas por letras. Estou tentando solicitar junto a câmara de vereadores a criação das leis para nomea-las. Assim denominado elas de letras fica mais fácil explicar a localização de cada logradouro. 
No mais o município está em expansão algumas áreas aí da não constam no mapa.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 14:15:41+00:00): sim ,mas ficou muito estranho assim.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 14:16:09+00:00): acredito que você pode deixar o nome e tirar essa parte "sem nome"
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:30:47+00:00): Na podstawie jakich źródeł ta edycja została wykonana?
user_14117678 (2022-02-15 16:36:15+00:00): Wiedza lokalna/wizyta na miejscu
Małgorzata W (2022-03-12 20:41:18+00:00): Dziwne. Naprawdę dostęp do tych boisk zmienił się na prywatny?  Możesz powiedzieć kto podał Ci taką informację na miejscu? 
Portal miejski podaje godziny otwarcia obu boisk  dla mieszkańców i nie informuje nigdzie, żeby to się zmieniło. 
Info pod linkiem: 
 https://www.bialystok.pl/pl/dla_mieszkancow/sport_i_rekreacja/boiska/kawaleryjskie/zespol-szkolno-przedszkolny-nr-2-w-bialymstoku-1.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-22 16:35:46+00:00): ten link teraz nie działa ale autor edycji się skasował co uznaję za przyznanie się do wandalizmu
ALu68 (2022-02-15 07:32:00+00:00): building=*
Use building=yes instead.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:16:44+00:00): essas vias existem? não parece. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11010695162
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:27:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185369317
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:28:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185588821
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:30:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185589733
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:33:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185334047
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-31 22:54:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185583848
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-02 14:25:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185576557
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-02 14:26:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185575857
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-02 14:30:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11012874072
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-03 19:16:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185329136
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-03 19:17:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185588824
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-03 19:17:53+00:00): 1185367692
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-03 19:17:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185367692
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-07 19:04:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120084384
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-07 19:10:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120648838
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-07 19:16:45+00:00): 1118159450
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-07 19:17:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120084384
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-07 23:04:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120588618
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-09 19:23:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1143636142
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:30:49+00:00): Na podstawie jakich źródeł ta edycja została wykonana?
user_14117678 (2022-02-15 16:36:10+00:00): Wiedza lokalna/wizyta na miejscu