piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ExecutableFiles (2021-07-23 20:59:44+00:00): Ah so that's what I did, sorry about that. Thanks for pointing that out!
b-jazz (2021-07-24 06:08:45+00:00): No worries. If you look at my history, you'll see I fix a dozen or so similar errors a day. It gets to be old hat.
syncronic (2021-07-17 09:05:46+00:00): Warum hast du das auf construction zurückgesetzt? Die Brücke ist fertig und benutzbar, zumindest für Fußgänger und Radfahrer.
Zinoural (2021-07-16 18:07:59+00:00): Sorry for the large boundary. It is because of the addings of the NATO relation. All the other changes are only in the Riga area.
bergaufsee (2021-07-16 20:12:48+00:00): Auf den Brücken der Brieselanger Str. sind die begleitenden Wege nur Gehwege auf denen ich sogar vom Fahrrad absteigen muss, rechtlich darf ich dort also auch die Straße nutzen, daher hatte ich bicycle=use_sidepath an diesen Stellen auch explizit weggelassen.
Ist aber auch nicht wirklich schlimm so ;)
StefanHRT (2021-07-16 20:38:45+00:00): Ich habe es auch nur gemacht, da dort kein Ausweich von Brücke auf die Straße möglich ist ;)
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-17 15:40:16+00:00): Source: https://www.facebook.com/groups/106716250895/permalink/10157934094740896/
WoodWoseWulf (2021-07-17 06:11:45+00:00): Hi nhymz,

This park is already on the map, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9748800
nhymz (2021-07-17 22:47:53+00:00): Hi WoodWoseWulf,

My mistake, I did not realize the actual trails had been listed as park!
user_5359 (2021-07-17 15:55:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You didn't need the key area, if the object has the key building.
yxoc (2023-07-13 07:03:15+00:00): Hello, why are you placing a gate right on a cycleway running in parallel to a road? Do you know that place? You indicate as source an imagery severvice, so I guess not.
yrtimiD (2021-07-17 15:49:36+00:00): Hi, why you changed name tag to be an English variant?
Regarding your note in fixme - all non existing ways are added only as proposed or construction.
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-17 16:20:22+00:00): Hi,
I thought the general name in English is the convention we should use for the main name. Let me know if it isn't and feel free to roll back. 
Regarding the fixme, thanks for the explanation.
yrtimiD (2021-07-17 17:32:03+00:00): Oh, absolutely no! The main name is always the name in the most common language in the area. On whole Israel territory it will be Hebrew, except of Arabic in some  places occupied by mostly arabic-speakign people. Please take a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming

If you remember similar name tag changes you did - please revert.
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-17 18:37:38+00:00): Always good to learn something. Thank you.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-02 01:47:37+00:00): Parque no existente. Vandalismo puro
cserpell (2021-07-17 14:02:32+00:00): Estimado/a, por favor no marcar como parques zonas que son privadas, de poco tamaño y que cumplen otra función.
Stalker61 (2021-07-16 20:11:13+00:00): Добрый вечер.
Будьте так любезны уважать корректно внесенные данные с использованием снимков бинг.
При использовании снимков махар делайте соответствующее смещение и привязывайтесь к точкам пересечений перекрестков и углов зданий.
Не будете этого делать придется сделать откат вашего труда.
С уважением, Stalker61
Yu_llis (2021-09-10 11:56:07+00:00): Питання по дорогам з південно-західного напрямку до траверсу хребта Сивуль (лінії 962301681, 962301908, 965042739) — на основі чого були внесені дані зміни? 
Цих доріг в реальності нема. Внесення неперевірених даних в зоні гір може коштувати комусь здоров'я і життя.
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 00:29:24+00:00): Дякую за корекцію.
aachso (2021-07-17 03:30:16+00:00): Hello AsuTW and welcome to OSM!

You deleted two stop_positions and they're now mostly meaningless nodes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3421826598
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534916004

Was that on purpose? It doesn't look right to me.
AsuTW (2021-07-17 04:39:26+00:00): To "aachso",
It should be my accidental mistake. I have tried to correct it in 108136010. I hope that it is reverted now.
highflyer74 (2021-11-17 17:50:02+00:00): Moin! Ist schon etwas her, aber sei so nett, nicht pauschal von Node auf das Gebäude umzutaggen. In Bremen haben wir oftmals eine Trennung von Gebäuden und dem, was sich in ihm befindet. Das hängt damit zusammen, dass wir eine immer größer werdende Menge an Gebäudedaten haben. Angaben über Stockwerke, Höhen, Dachformen, Farben, Materialien, Denkmalschutz, Architekten etc. lassen sich so besser von den Daten trennen, die mit dem Nutzer des Gebäudes zusammenhängen. Das reduziert zum einen die Fehlerquote bei unerfahrenen Mappern, zum anderen ist man flexibler, wenn doch einmal mehr als ein Nutzer in ein Gebäude kommt. Viele Grüße und einen schönen Abend Dir!
papamat15 (2021-12-01 21:51:14+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Hatte mich da wohl etwas falsch informiert, indem ich einfach ein paar Rettungsstationen (an der Küste) als Muster angeschaut hatte. Da hilft ein fundierter Änderungshinweis immer mehr. Ich hoffe jetzt ist die Zuordnung der Daten korrekt. Etwas  Zweifel habe ich aber am Eintrag "service" für den Gebäudetyp. hier sah ich bisher immer Versorgungsgebäude für Strom, Wasser oder Telekommunikation.
Gruß papamat15
highflyer74 (2021-12-02 12:05:08+00:00): Hallo!

Da gebe ich Dir Recht, =service ist nicht optimal. Ich denke, ein =commercial passt hier besser, ist aber auch nicht so toll. So eine richtige Meinung habe ich dazu nicht. Schönen Tag Dir!
MerlinPendragon (2021-07-16 19:56:19+00:00): Hello! Would you mind explaining the rationale behind these edits? I've noticed you're changing many of the roads through parking lots from service=parking_aisle to service=driveway, which is an inappropriate use of that tag. You've also deleted many sidewalks, as well as the entire landuse area for the Hollywood Casino.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-17 15:39:31+00:00): I apologize that’s just how I’m used to mapping, I apologize for removing the sidewalk but I usually tag buildings at point tags
ftcat (2021-07-17 06:42:34+00:00): uliwanne,

You are making many errors with rivers I have asked you before to try use OpenTopoMap. It seems all you want to do is cover Zambia with totally incorrect information. It takes hours correcting the errors you have made, many I don't find.

Hotosm project is to map roads only, you are not following the guidelines. I will have to report this mapping to the Hot coordinators is you continue. This is part of the Kafue National Park, there are very few roads or buildings in this region
uliwanne (2021-07-17 11:37:53+00:00): Dear ftcat
Thank you for the information about the Kafue National Park. Which animals are to see there?
The rivers and streams are detected of the aero images. On Open TopoMap are good niveau lines. This line are generated automaticly., the precision is to ask. This is not the AMEN in the church! The same is the combination of different images.
What we will do with these maps?
The government want to develop the area in a lot of cases of infrastructure. 
In cases of Convid19, ebola and other the health people want to register the sick people. Therefore such maps are very successful. To visit the settlements per car, aeroplane or helicopter.
The water and power government need the maps for planning pipe, dams and power lines and power stations.
Without the rivers an off road rite is very difficult.
What is your role in the system, not mapper, not validator, but error dretector? Please feel free to correct the mistakes done by me.
ftcat (2021-07-17 13:01:07+00:00): Hi uliwanne,

The OpenTopmap elevations are generated from from NASA STRM data and are fairly accurate. The trouble is you are very roughly tracing ephemeral streams from satellite imagery from features I don't think you understand and often your lines are some meters off where the actual stream may run. If it is just a few errors it is not a problem to correct but when it is many as is often the case it takes hours and even months. Trying to correct the waterway errors you made in the Mkushi district has taken me months and I am sure there are still many errors.

I can assure you the Zambian Government does not use OpenStreetMap to make decisions about development especially as the data is very inaccurate and many years out of date. Firstly the satellite imagery can be many many years out of date, I know this because I live in Zambia and know what is the situation on the ground. Secondly remote mappers such as yourself are mapping charcoal kilns, anthills and bushes as buildings, even burnt logs. Also many of what you think are roads or tracks are not, especially around small fields in the rural areas that you insist on mapping. If somebody tried to use what you map as roads or tracks they would end up in serious trouble, that is why I get annoyed.

We do not have ebola in Zambia, never have. The Government here has never flown out to register sick people, missionaries maybe, but they don't use OpenStreetMap.

If you check you will see I have mapped many parts of Zambia, in fact I only map in Zambia and small areas in neighbouring countries because I know them. I don't map in Europe or other countries because I know I will make errors, such as you are making here in Zambia. Recently I have been forced to correct the many many errors made by remote mappers and it is becoming disheartening.

If your wish is for Governments and official organizations to make more use of OpenStreetMap then it has to be more accurate otherwise it is just rubbish. Take more time to look closely at what you are mapping and you may get an idea as to what you are seeing in the images, don't just assume streams run through the middle of the wet lands sometimes they run to the sides or zig zag across them, some have no streams at all. These wetlands are seasonal and known as "dambos" they act as a sponge and once fully saturated start to run with a small stream and some years may never run and often only run towards the end of the wet season which is from November to March. In the dry season they will burn hence the large black areas you see in the images.

If you would like to know what animals are in the Kafue National Park Google it.
rab (2021-07-18 22:14:33+00:00): uliwanne, was würdest du denn davon halten wenn wir gleich alles wieder löschen? Wer soll sich denn in Zukunft um die ganzen Daten kümmern? Versuch doch einfach mal das Schrottprojekt #5842 anhand der aktuelleren Maxar Bilder zu aktualisieren. Du mutest mit deiner Arbeitswut der praktisch nicht vorhanden sambischen community eine schier unlösbare Aufgabe zu. 
Darüber hinaus vergrämst irgendwann auch noch den einzigen langfristig orientierten lokalen Mapper.
Wenn du dich in Afrika umschaust, wirst du überall Gegenden finden die von HOT so zugemüllt wurden das sich da seit Jahren niemand mehr ran getraut hat.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:17:58+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiss
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927463358/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
maraf24 (2021-08-06 19:11:07+00:00): Nieczynne.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:18:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiss
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927554756/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:18:02+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiss
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927574728/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
TomCerts (2021-07-16 21:35:25+00:00): Source update: Mapillary imagery used
moosfrosch (2021-07-19 18:29:57+00:00): Das Löschen von allen möglichen Angaben und Objekten statt Overlay und Lifetime-Prefix ist meiner Meinung nach Vandalismus
Ltrlg (2021-07-16 21:20:56+00:00): source += Cadastre
GerdP (2022-07-22 07:04:55+00:00): Hi!
Watch out! Objects like this
https://www.osm.org/way/965079567
are not buildings. It's a man made pile of silage covered with foil and lots of tires.
snoozingnewt (2022-08-17 00:17:20+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!
felipeeugenio (2021-07-16 23:03:51+00:00): Hola. landuse=grass tiene otro significado (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass)
esos terrenos probablemente son grassland, meadow o farmland. Pero nunca grass. Por favor considerar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108142469
PB5687 (2021-07-19 20:59:10+00:00): Tienes razón, lo siento. ("landcover=grass" sería probablemente la mejor opción? Pero casi no es utilizado). Veo que ya lo has cambiado, pero lo tendré en cuenta, gracias.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-19 21:12:19+00:00): buena. no hay problema. saludos
MxxCon (2021-07-17 05:23:52+00:00): Hello.
Why are all your changes include survey date of September of last year?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108143161
o_andras (2021-07-16 23:12:41+00:00): This was pretty cool. The water would bubble up from time to time, like in a jacuzzi. However, I'm not sure this is an actual spring.
user_5359 (2022-01-20 06:43:14+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1feU. What is the meaning of the tag highway=foo?

Olá! Por favor, tenha uma vista de olhos em https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1feU. Qual é o significado da etiqueta highway=foo?
Fidelis Assis (2022-01-20 11:28:57+00:00): Hi, I have no idea how it got there. Anyway, I changed them all to traffic_calming=hump. Thank you for the warning.
eggie (2023-04-05 19:19:30+00:00): Dag kammah..   Realiseer je dat wanneer je trottoirs op deze manier toevoegt het niet goed routeert als je geen verbindingen maakt met andere trottoirs.

MVG
eggie
HirschKauz (2021-07-17 11:11:31+00:00): Hi crasu, was bitte ist [parking:lane:both=narked]??  
Magst Du den Tippfehler korrigieren bitte? ;-)  
Grüße HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108143379
HirschKauz (2021-09-26 19:15:27+00:00): schade, dass Du nicht auf meinen CS-Kommentar reagiert hast. Ich habe nun den Typo 'narked' in 'marked' geändert - Außerden war auch eine unterirdische Pipeline mit 'parking:lane:both' markiert ;-) Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108143379
mueschel (2021-07-19 08:25:57+00:00): Hi,
please explain this import of data. I can see several issues here:

- The changeset misses the required link to the documentation and discussion page
- all the objects have many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g. 
    arpente=false
    commune=91272
    contenance=110995
    created=2006-03-20
    id=912720000E0234
    numero=234
    prefixe=000
    section=E
    updated=2017-08-07
josmougn (2021-07-23 20:15:23+00:00): Bonjour, I'm trying to draw a protected natural area (it's much more longer to do than expected) and my main source is the french cadastre from where are coming these fancy attributes. As the keys are always the same it will be easy at the end to modify or remove them all at once.
What do you mean by "the required link to the documentation and discussion page" ?
José
mueschel (2021-07-31 14:59:18+00:00): I referred to the mandatory OSM import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Glassman (2021-07-19 22:14:24+00:00): According to NHD the creek is name North Fork Thirty-five Mile Creek. Where did you get the other name from? Are their signs with the creeks name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108143571
Tom Talbott (2021-07-20 00:04:16+00:00): I'm not sure what NHD is. This is from local knowledge. You will notice that the trail that runs along the creek is named "North Fork 25 Mile Creek Trail" (https://www.wta.org/go-hiking/hikes/north-fork-25-mile-creek, https://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/okawen/recarea/?recid=57293, https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/washington/north-fork-25-mile-creek-trail--2). Also, the water system that is permitted and uses the water out of the creek has a plaque that says "North Fork 25 Mile Creek Water System". It merges with the main fork of 25 Mile Creek a bit below the trailhead and is the north fork of it. That is about as authoritative as I can get.
Glassman (2021-07-20 02:23:24+00:00): Thanks for the info. NHD stands for the USGS National Hydrography Dataset. Now that you pointed it out, it does seem strange that the north fork 35 mile creek would meet up with the 25 mile creek. I'm going to ask a friend that works for WA 

Ecology to see if he can get USGS to fix the name. 

The person who added the stream has a great reputation and a background from working for the State. That's the main reason I even asked.

NHD can be found at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography/national-hydrography-dataset?qt-science_support_page_related_con=0#qt-science_support_page_related_con
Tom Talbott (2021-07-20 03:25:47+00:00): Cool. It would be great if it could be fixed in the original source as well.
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 21:29:24+00:00): Reverted Changeset #112628206
marc__marc (2022-09-28 20:02:19+00:00): Hello,
what did you mean with a highway=street lamp seatt=4 ?
Regards,
Marc
Gregory UKR (2021-10-07 20:26:25+00:00): Hello Flierfy, You have reclassified the entire railway from Ovruch to Chernihiv as main, but I believe it is hardly the case. The part from Vilcha to Yaniv I would classify as industrial. There was some regular passenger traffic there in old days, but after the Chernobyl disaster this part has been rarely used. Ukrzaliznytsia did not want to maintain it because it passes through a contaminated area, because on a way to Chernihiv it passes the international border twice, and because the demand for commercial and passenger traffic has mostly evaporated there. So early this year, the government of Ukraine transferred the control over the Vilcha-Yaniv part of railway from Ukrzaliznytsia to Energoatom (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/91-2021-%D1%80). Energoatom has already renovated it this summer (actually, it contracted Ukrzaliznytsia to do the work, https://www.railjournal.com/freight/chernobyl-exclusion-zone-reconnected-to-ukraines-railway-network), and it will be the sole user of this part of Ovruch-Chernihiv railway.
flierfy (2021-10-10 08:21:33+00:00): Hello Gregory,
don't be mislead by the fractured nature of the line in the present. I'm convinced that this line was built to main line standards. Not least because parts of the line were already tagged usage=main. I merely extended this value over the entire line.
With kind regards,
Stephan
Gregory UKR (2021-10-13 22:56:22+00:00): Hi Stephan, The Bible says that the world originally was quite different from how it is today. This railway too has changed quite a bit since its opening in 1930. Energoatom placed the following photo to demonstrate the state of this railway before its renovation this summer https://www.energoatom.com.ua/images/publicationGallery/60ebf9de81c09.jpeg It might convince you that the railway was no longer within the main line standards. Next, the wiki page for key:usage puts an emphasis on primary usage of a railway, mentioning as criteria of a main line “presumably heavy traffic, often double tracked and/or electrified, may be high speed.” The railway from Vilcha to Yaniv does not and will not have heavy traffic, it is singe-tracked and not electrified. Spent nuclear fuel that Energoatom will carry on this railway to a recently constructed storage will be transported, I hope, at the lowest acceptable speed. That fuel will stay at the storage for 100 years, they say. Best, Gregory
BCNorwich (2021-07-17 07:03:56+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if the holes are actually formally named or are these just reference numbers? If merely reference numbers then the tag would be ref=1, ref-2 etc. If they really are formal names then the name should start with a capital letter and there should be a space between name and number. Formal hole names are usually to show/promote/memorialise a  certain feature, person, or object. Thus the name seems not to be a formal verifiable name, hole 1 is just a reference.

Also there's no need for two tags denoting a grass area. A tee has a surface, in this case it's grass. Growing grass in this situation is not landuse, it's to provide a surface.

Regards Bernard.
aweech (2021-07-20 21:39:08+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed this edit as you requested. The old roadbed is faint, and it is not a public highway, so I agree that track isn't the best tag for this. However, I found documents saying that snowmobiles use the roadway, and it did look that way when I visited the site. But I obviously can't be sure if it is used as a snowmobile trail this time of year, so I restored it with the abandoned:highway tag (which doesn't render most places but keeps the data around in case we need to give it standard tags). I'll check again in midwinter to see if there are snowmobile tracks leading into the roadway. Also, in this edit you deleted a rock wall, accidentally I hope, which I restored.
DaveF (2022-07-24 00:53:49+00:00): Hi
Is this really a tee?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965098921/history
pitscheplatsch (2021-07-18 05:53:56+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108144740
pitscheplatsch (2021-07-18 05:54:04+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108144732
ravali_78 (2021-07-19 05:37:01+00:00): Hi Sai Mawn Kham,
I have fixed the untagged way and residential connected to main road.Kindly check with way 965099727,way 965099719,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108219489.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108144767
Sai Mawn Kham (2021-07-19 05:51:07+00:00): Thank you.
gscholz (2021-12-24 06:40:12+00:00): Hi FS Patagonia,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Bocahue Country Club":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.04308&lat=-38.94013&zoom=16&opacity=0.57

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108144849

Can you please fix this?

My impression is that you have some trouble to keep relations in good order. One part of this problem is your OSM editor ID, Can you please switch to JOSM if you edit relations, this will make your life easier and avoid errors in the OSM database?

Kind regards
Guido
FS Patagonia (2021-12-24 16:10:11+00:00): Hola Guido! La página OSM Inspector me va a servir para solucionar futuros errores, y en este caso ya reparé la relación. Saludos!
MxxCon (2021-07-17 05:31:20+00:00): Hello.
Based on satellite imagery of this parking lot, and definition of this tag from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side, it doesn't seem like a correct tag. It seems like it should be just "surface". Don't you think so?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108144876
Nat Bradley (2021-07-17 13:04:28+00:00): Hi, I'm fairly new to OSM and you are probably right. Is this, because I would have to cross the sidewalk to get there?

(I'm just wondering when I ever would use parking:street_side)
MxxCon (2021-07-17 14:03:13+00:00): Yup. Even though this parking lot is pretty close to the road, there's still sidewalk separating it. That wiki article has some photos with examples of what "street_side" looks like.
Nat Bradley (2021-07-17 14:13:25+00:00): That makes sense to me now. Thank you very much for looking into this & double checking my contribution. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108161952