piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cytryn (2021-11-02 18:40:54+00:00): Czy możemy prosić Cię o dodawanie komentarzy do zmian?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pewnie nie tylko mi byłoby łatwiej wtedy zrozumieć dlaczego transformator przestał być transformatorem
sundew (2021-11-08 23:15:59+00:00): Hi,
warum reaktivierst du den als entfernt gekennzeichneten Briefmarkenautomaten (n1957237679)? Hast du das vor Ort geprüft? 
VG
Jorisbo (2021-11-09 08:01:21+00:00): Hallo Sundew, Danke fur deine aufmerksamkeit. Es ist ein fehler und  geändert in 'disused' . grusse Joris
lyctkel (2021-11-02 20:15:37+00:00): Hi kruathai_koeln,
gerade bin ich über deinen Changeset gestolpert. Schön Dich bei OSM begrüssen zu können.
Mir sind noch einige Verbesserungen aufgefallen, die ich ergänzt habe:
Die Öffnungszeiten haben nun die richtige Syntax (Mo-Su 00:00-01:00, 20:00-24:00), ferner ist nun auch karaoke=yes angegeben.
Lediglich brewery=yes ist nicht vollständig. Hier sollte eine Liste der Brauereien stehen. Siehe hierzu auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:brewery
Viel Spass und herzliche Grüsse
lyctkel
maraf24 (2021-11-03 22:27:20+00:00): Ze zmianami w tym zestawie są poważne problemy związane z drogami, które są zamknięte lub planowane.
Frans S (2021-11-03 11:41:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A small remark.
Please tag buildings just as 
building=yes.
Thank you

Hola. Gracias por el mapeo aquí.
Una pequeña observación.
Por favor, etiquetar los edificios como 
building=yes
Gracias
iandees (2021-11-03 00:39:36+00:00): Hi! Last I checked highway 62 still had a 55 mph speed limit. Did that change recently?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113295833
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:44:51+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522524
literan (2021-11-03 17:26:29+00:00): обозначение ТЧ-9 уже стоит на территории депо https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2400268

не надо дублировать его на одном из зданий
user_3022894 (2023-03-28 12:13:45+00:00): Hi,

das von dir hier auf dem Gelände der Deutsche Telekom in der Straße "Auf der Bleiche" eingetragene viereckige Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998483964/history habe ich wieder entfernt. Ich hoffe, das ist ok. Das Gebäude existiert so nicht. Es gibt dort eine viereckige Struktur, die allerdings die Plattform des dortigen Towers / Masten ist.
Das ist kein Gebäude. Der Mast steht, an den Boden angrenzend, auf einem quadratischen Bereich, der anders gepflastert ist und mit Betonplatten überdeckt ist, aber ein Gebäude befindet sich dort nicht.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
tux67 (2021-11-03 07:42:49+00:00): Hi CarnyC,

deine changesets waren alle mit review requested geflaggt. Bisher alles (bis auf den Briefkasten den lyctkel angepasst hat) ok.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113296236
Russ (2021-11-07 11:21:34+00:00): Hi,

You added some names for unpopulated places here as place=suburb. These place tags are intended for populated places only, so using them could be considered "tagging for the renderer":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

In the case of Dartford Marshes, this was already mapped as a wetland area, which does actually get shown on the map:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572429422

I have removed and changed a few of these place nodes accordingly.
wille (2021-12-20 20:24:32+00:00): Essa lagoa não está visível em nenhuma imagem de satélite. Acho que faria mais sentido mapear a área que é realmente inundada na época de chuvas do que traçar uma área que não corresponde mais com a realidade atual.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113296730
Canoa de Tolda (2021-12-20 20:34:29+00:00): Prezado, a lagoa existe, porém sem água, como explicamos há pouco em outro comentário. Esse trabalho está baseado em profundo conhecimento local. A realidade atual é a montagem de base documental para que a sociedade possa reivindicar maiores vazões no rio São Francisco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113296730
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
VictorIE (2022-06-09 21:28:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998490688 and nearby objects.

"fixme=estimated dimensions, nothing on satellite view yet"


Esri World Imagery now available. Some of these are two houses, mapped as one.
francians (2021-11-02 19:24:53+00:00): Ciao.

Aggiungi anche office=association...

Francesco
Futur3r (2021-11-02 19:50:26+00:00): Les casiers sont déjà cartographiés et le schéma utiliser n'est pas le bon -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Locker

Merci de faire attention
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113297269
Sandal man (2021-11-03 09:26:40+00:00): Lo siento, pero no puedes empezar a dibujar rutas para caminar.
Esto solo es posible con relaciones en OSM, consulte
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relaciones
philippec (2021-11-02 19:51:38+00:00): Bedankt, het ware natuurlijk beter dat u het verbeterde.
Sandal man (2021-11-02 22:30:03+00:00): Lo siento, pero no puedes empezar a dibujar rutas para caminar.
Esto solo es posible con relaciones en OSM, consulte
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relaciones
lyctkel (2021-11-02 20:26:33+00:00): Hi CarnyC,
gerade bin ich über deinen Changeset gestolpert. 
Mir scheint hier gibt es ein Missverständnis bei der Syntax.
collection_times und operator:wikipedia gehören nur auf die linke Seite.
Ich habe es (hoffentlich richtig) verbessert.
Viel Spass und herzliche Grüsse
lyctkel
CarnyC (2021-11-03 10:33:32+00:00): Hi lyctkel,
vielen Dank ich bin noch recht neu dabei. Beim nächsten mal weiß ich bescheid.
Viele Grüße
CarnyC
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-26 13:17:00+00:00): Hi, this tiny section of road should not have been upgraded to trunk.  This is a topic that is being actively worked on in the United States, and I invite you to discuss further on Slack, channel #highway-classification, or on the talk-us list or OSM World Discord.

Also, please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
Joseph R P (2021-11-27 02:33:10+00:00): This appears to meet the criteria on the wiki though, because trunk is described as being used for expressways, long-haul routes, and other high-importance roads.
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-27 11:31:09+00:00): I agree we need to do some work to tighten up these definitions so they're useful to mappers.  Having dangling segments of different classifications makes a mess of the map as you zoom in and out.  Highways of the same classification should really form a coherent, importance-based network.  Perhaps we can recruit you to draft up the Virginia guidelines?
Volker Fröhlich (2021-11-19 08:48:10+00:00): Bitte Bäume nicht mit "Name" versehen, es sei denn sie haben einen Namen, wie z. B. Jubiläumseiche oder so.
DeKaN (2021-11-02 20:24:52+00:00): Подскажите, какое смещение для спутникового снимка вы используете?
DeKaN (2021-11-02 20:27:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop посмотрите справа на что можно ставить данный тег (точка, а не линия)
herivanich (2021-11-03 05:04:01+00:00): откатил назад пакет правок, спасибо за разъяснения
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113298475
aceman444 (2022-03-15 23:17:59+00:00): Vy si naozaj nedate povedat, zase pochybne premenovanie mosta Lanfranconi:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282404783

Keby ste si pozreli historiu objektu, zistili by ste, ze bol nedavno zamerne premenovany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110336928

Este aj na wikistranke, na ktoru odkazuje wikidata na objekte, a z ktorej nelegalne kradnete udaje, je historia nazvu uvedena.
Ano v diskusii pisu, ze nazov je troch sporny (https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusia:Most_Lanfranconi), ale Vy to nevyriesite, tak skuste neprepisovat lokalnych maperov.
(inak ak v ceskej verzii je to s 'n', https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Lanfranconi )

A ked uz prepisujete, zase nekompletne, napr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3748559 ste to nezmenili.
eggie (2021-11-02 20:31:42+00:00): Dag Brandnetelsoep. Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Kijk hier voor de mogelijkheden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

en
cuisine
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine

cuisine =asian 	node area 	A place that mainly sells Asian cuisine, which is one of the many styles from the continent of Asia. Use more specific tags if possible. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-02 21:21:46+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode nr 30 en cuisine = syrian toegevoegd. 
gr eggie
Brandnetelsoep (2021-11-03 05:52:42+00:00): Dankjewel, dit was m'n eerste wijziging buiten "street complete" om. Zal in het vervolg dit soort info aan adresnode koppelen.
ivanbranco (2023-12-12 00:50:39+00:00): Hi 9ix,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396509558/history

this wiki tag point to a letter (V), could you check it out?

thanks and good mapping!
ToniE (2021-11-09 12:05:34+00:00): Servus marco

Position der Haltestelle "Pfaffenhofen an der Glonn" ist duurch GTFS-Daten vom MVV bekannt und war schon eigetragen

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/single-trip.php?feed=DE-BY-MVV&release_date=&trip_id=42.T0.19-721-s21-1.18.R

Fixme in Relation 13395378

Gruß,
Toni
marcoSt (2021-11-09 19:33:22+00:00): Ah, OK. Mir hat es nur ein wenig irritiert weil 2 verschiedene Haltestellen mit dem selben Namen, aber unterschiedliche Positionen in dem Ort sind. 

Da dachte ich mir, die 2. Haltestelle, bei der Kirche, ist evtl. vom AVV. 

Nun gut, dann hat sich das Problem erledigt :-)

Schönen Abend noch

Viele Grüße
Marco
literan (2021-11-03 17:22:40+00:00): этот знак - motor_vehicle=destination

т.к. тем кто проживает, работает в этом месте, под знак по ПДД разрешено
PeterPan99 (2021-11-02 21:05:10+00:00): I have corrected the Mapillary ID.  It should contain only the Key value, not the whole URL
tiptracks (2021-11-03 16:16:44+00:00): Denk dat je addr:unit het best kunt gebruiken voor het vastleggen van kamernummer. Zie bijv https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8123680720

Succes!
iandees (2021-11-03 00:14:12+00:00): Note that this road already has the "West County Road E2" on it in the "name_1" tag. Is this road not called 5th Street Northwest at all?

Also, when setting the name for a road please make sure you expand all contractions, so instead of "W Co Rd E2", write out "West County Road E2".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113300412
Larmax (2021-11-03 08:16:41+00:00): Hei, palautin tekemäsi muutokset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113319505 väärien access-tägien vuoksi.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-03 10:41:36+00:00): cual es la idea estimado? Esto es vandalismo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113300435
streckenkundler (2021-11-02 20:38:58+00:00): Hei,
... nur so tipgebende Grüße...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal und meinen Forenbetrag https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73982 kennst du?
Alles Nutzbar... Feuer frei... :)

Grüße,

Sven
ovruni (2021-11-02 20:55:26+00:00): Hola Fer25, para abreviaturas de los nombres, como el caso de ATU se puede utilizar operator:short y dejar solo el nombre largo en el operator.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SekeRob (2021-11-02 21:13:18+00:00): You made a change in Prague per your comment but did not mention you also made a change in Palma de Mallorca. No idea how one does that, so the question is, why would that happen, but half of Europe now has this showing in the resent change set history.
Martin2035 (2021-11-03 15:03:24+00:00): @SekeRob – thank you, didn't notice that. sorry for the troubles.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
aceman444 (2022-03-10 23:17:56+00:00): Ale co, "missing"? No bola tam cesta ktoru ste zmenili na chodnik...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
philippec (2021-11-03 17:44:47+00:00): Meer Afhaalpunt aed
Misschien goed, misschien niet.
Mijn mening = https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27582&p=18
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
philippec (2021-11-03 17:36:24+00:00): Dendermonde  aed.
Opnieuw bedankt, het is toch vreemd hoe dikwijls dat gebeurt bij mij.
Dat bevestigt trouwens mijn mening dat we ons moeten wapenen tegen fouten met Mapillary.
PeterPan99 (2021-11-03 17:56:33+00:00): Thank you for your comments.  I see that you have edited the mapillary tag again, but unfortunately you have made another mistake, by putting the whole mapillary URL in the field.  You must only put the ID number in there.  (It follows "&pKey=" in the URL).  I have corrected this one for you.
philippec (2021-11-03 17:59:55+00:00): No, that is no mistake, the Wiki is wrong.
kmpoppe (2021-11-03 20:23:54+00:00): @philippec, stating "the Wiki is wrong" without providing any more insight isn't really helpful in any discussion about this topic.

I am currently working with all mapillary values and I can safely say: Of the 202.2k distinct values that are in the "mapillary" key, only 37.6k (18,6%) have a "http"-notation.

Furthermore, the wiki specifically states "The reason for adding the key and not the full URI is that the URI might change (and already did in the past), but the key will stay the same. For the same reason the direct link to the image (e.g. https://images.mapillary.com/.../thumb-2048.jpg) should not be tagged.".

We're quite literally seeing that the v3 notation of the web-app was https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/... and the v4 notation is https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=..., so the statement above is totally accurate.

As I am preparing an automated edit (which was discussed on the Tagging-ML) that aims to transferring the "old" V3 ids to the new V4 ids, it is vital that every misunderstandings about this key are solved before we start with this work. I would therefore politely ask you to provide any insight into why you think it's wrong to only save the ID in the database.

Thanks.

Kai
philippec (2021-11-03 20:27:09+00:00): I
philippec (2021-11-03 20:29:58+00:00): I am the number one Mapillary contributor and mapper.
Read the Wiki discussion.
If by accident my work is destroyed, I will redo.
I am not happy with foreign people without a profile and knowledge interfering with my work of five years.
The wiki way was not possible to work with.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27582&p=18
kmpoppe (2021-11-03 20:56:23+00:00): Thank you for linking the forum discussion.

As this is in Dutch which I sadly do not speak, I had to use Google Translate on your last entry and am quite frankly shocked that you call me "a German do-gooder is busy maiming my work". If you believe that this is the right way for a respectful discussion in this community I seriously have to reconsider contributing anything else.

You write "the Mapillary key has changed, luckily without any problems." which is an argument that I simply cannot understand. There were tons of Thumbnail-links that do no work anymore. That the old mapillary links still work for the web-app (with using four redirects to come to the right URL) might be right, yet the Mapillary API simply will only accept the new IDs if you were to use that API in any software, so there is no way around changing the values.

Is your only problem that we removed (and plan on) removing the https-part in the key or are you openly opposing the change of the old to the new IDs?

You could also join in the discussion on the Tagging-Mailinglist.
philippec (2021-11-03 20:58:17+00:00): This was not well explained.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
BCNorwich (2021-11-03 08:28:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag name=Emirates Stadium is already on the stadium outline (as per OSM practice), so there's no need to add it again to the pitch. Thus I've removed the duplicated name.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-11-03 08:40:57+00:00): Hi, I've squared up the pools and tagged them as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
tom_yorados (2021-11-02 21:53:57+00:00): Bitte vergebe einen changeset-Kommentar damit man sieht was du geändert hast.
Viele Grüße
marc__marc (2023-01-30 22:13:59+00:00): Hello,
it seem you made a typo for practice_pitch
but is a wall a practice_pitch ?
I think the practice_pitch is the whole area, the wall is only a part of it
Regards,
Marc
ovruni (2021-11-02 22:20:57+00:00): Hola Fer25, he notado que parece que se esta confundiendo las etiquetas highway=bus_stop con public_transport=stop_position, el primero es el lugar donde los pasajeros esperan el transporte (el cual puede tener etiquetas de banca, papelera, techo, etc) y el segundo es donde el bus se detiene, el cual debe de ser un nodo de la vía.
Fer25 (2021-11-02 22:44:12+00:00): Las que he colocado yo son las que dicen Bus Stopping Location (public_transport=stop_position) No llegué a revisar todas las paradas que ya estaban puestas
ovruni (2021-11-02 22:47:08+00:00): Hay nodos que estaban en las vias como bus_stop y los cambiaste a stop_position, estos debía haberse movido a un lado de la vía y agregar otro con stop_position o mover las etiquetas del bus_stop a un nuevo nodo al lado, no cambiarlos.
Saludos
Fer25 (2021-11-02 22:53:52+00:00): Oh, entiendo, gracias
ovruni (2021-11-02 22:56:52+00:00): También estoy notando que eliminaste nodos de bus_stop.
Fer25 (2021-11-02 23:01:50+00:00): Hay algunos que estaban puestos en esa vía que eliminé y los pasé a la vía principal. Los puse como un nodo en la vía porque normalmente esa parte no hay como bancas para esperar y solo es la zona del bus
Fer25 (2021-11-02 23:03:50+00:00): Lo que me di cuenta también es que toda La Avenida Tacna falta actualizar porque esta con la información de antes de Los Corredores Complementarios. Por ejemplo, los nombres de las paradas y varias rutas de buses que ya no pasan por ahí
ovruni (2021-11-02 23:14:49+00:00): En realidad en toda lima tenemos muchas rutas que se han roto o necesitan actualizarse con la nueva versión del esquema de tranposrte público. Si deseas trabajar mas de las rutas puedo ver la forma de sacar un listado.
Saludos
Saludos
Fer25 (2021-11-02 23:21:49+00:00): Si, ahora que salga de vacaciones de la Universidad voy a tratar de mejorar la parte de los corredores. Lo bueno que ahi hay información de los paraderos de la ATU. Mas bien, respecto a los punto de las paradas, entonces es necesario colocar un punto en la via de public_transport=stop_position y afuera de la via uno de bus_stop? Porque en Lima hay varios paraderos que no tienen una infraestructura, solo es la señal de bus 
Saludos
ovruni (2021-11-02 23:35:57+00:00): stop_position [0] y bus_stop [1] son para dos cosas distintas, el primero va como un nodo de la vía, el segundo a una lado de la vía y suele tener un renderizado (icono), ademas en este se puede indicar si hay un poste que indica el paradero, si esta iluminado, si tiene bancas, basurero, techo, etc 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
Fer25 (2021-11-03 02:49:36+00:00): oh, me quedó más claro. En ese caso, voy a tener que agregar bus_stop por la Avenida Las Flores, ya que ahi solo agregué el stop_position. 
Gracias por la aclaración
user_5359 (2021-11-05 17:47:38+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hydranten haben keine Namen, dies ist eher eine Ortsbeschreibung.
BubbaJuice (2021-11-03 23:57:27+00:00): Hello 1T_money, 

Splitting ways to make them shorter literally serves no purpose unless you are editing the area and the way you are editing becomes over 2000 nodes long.

You have caused an inconvenience to me because I have a lot of unpublished changes in this area and I got one big conflict because of this.

Please reconsider this next time.

Thank you, BubbaJuice