piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-06-25 12:25:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


Review
name:nl kan weg.. Dat wordt buiten de landsgrenzen gebruikt.
name= zal renderen mits een combinatie met
office=company  of iets beters? 
Zie wiki bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=company

MVG,
Eggie
maposm (2020-06-30 21:11:14+00:00): Hallo jalbrecht_d!
Du hast um ein Review dieses Änderungssatzes gebeten: 
Beim Schnellimbiss hast du einen wenig Aussagekräfigen Wert bei den Öffnungszeiten eingetragen. Beachte, dass dabei Wochentage abgekürzt werden (englische Abkürzungen > Mo,Tu,We,Th,Fr,Sa,Su) und Uhrzeiten ergänzt werden sollten. Lies dir dazu am besten mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours durch.
Bei der Werbeagentur hast du nur ergänzt, dass diese auch in Corona-Zeiten geöffnet hat. Da wäre es vielleicht sinnvoller gewesen, (auch) die regulären Öffnungszeiteneinzutragen, oder?

Viele Grüße
maposm
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87138571
Duja (2021-04-02 08:26:57+00:00): Ono kad napraviš tipfeler pa ga copy-pastuješ na još 20 mesta... :)
(Ako nisi shvatio, vidi moj CS 102148704)

Btw, ja koristim https://www.lexilogos.com/keyboard/serbian_conversion.htm za generisanje ćirilice, brže je nego prekucavanje.
Badojo (2021-04-02 08:51:13+00:00): A kad sam retard pošto mi ćirilica nije materinja. Ja koristim na Windowsu srpsku tipkovnicu pa samo pišem kao na latinici, a onda ak napravim grešku teže ću skužit na ćirilici. U ovom slučaju to je jer je l ispod o.
eggie (2020-06-25 12:04:40+00:00): En nog steeds geen commentaar?  Op de changeset gevraagd en via PB nu.
het is toch een kleine moeite om inte vullen Straatmeubilair toegevoegd oid
Gr eggie
user_11166885 (2020-06-25 12:20:54+00:00): Da verificare il termine/inizio della SR UD 66
Vinber (2020-07-06 07:35:32+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).


Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
eggie (2020-06-25 13:13:54+00:00): Best lastig met mapsme. In OSM taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnode . Niet op het gebouw. Geen spatie in postcodes zetten.
Gr eggie
eckerg (2020-06-25 12:26:51+00:00): Kerékpártárolók hozzáadva a Pannónia utca - Radnóti Miklós utca sarkán.
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-25 12:25:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-25 12:38:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 85824253, 85826702, 85828067, 85832178, 85832284, 85835985, 85845725, 85848246, 85848933, 85862053, 85900445, 86042268, 86047549, 86052033, 86053838, 86056512, 86056609, 86060113, 86060261, 86060381, 86069457, 86081715, 86081978, 86094423, 86095436, 86095615, 86095669, 86109643, 86113246, 86128496, 86129058, 86130273, 86132902, 86137877, 86143751, 86145690, 86148662, 86148993, 86152157, 86164323, 86169051, 86177629, 86239753, 86251659, 86284556, 86285252, 86285331, 86287134, 86287325, 86302920, 86303067, 86303422, 86303556, 86417476, 86418490, 86732463, 87068455.
Nakaner (2020-06-25 12:57:23+00:00): This revert included a couple of changesets by people working for Kaart and QA mappers because they just fixed errors introduced by the vandal instead of tackling the real root cause. Minor improvements might have been lost but the benefit of reverting vandalism outweights the losses of these careless "improvements".
BCNorwich (2020-06-25 14:40:45+00:00): Hello Nakaner, 
Your words are not very kind to say the least. 
Please reflect that those folk who made what you call "careless improvements" may not have been aware of the greater problem, had they have known they may well have done a good job of correction. 

It is impolite to cast such aspersions on your fellow mappers even if you believe yourself to be right. Everyone is absolutely equal.

Regards Bernard.
rmikke (2020-08-10 17:35:29+00:00): Droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33019026 to raczej unclassified niż service, nawet jeśli te kilka domków na końcu to jedno gospodarstwo
KrzysztZ (2020-08-10 19:31:30+00:00): Chyba za bardzo się sugerowałem właśnie tymi domami na końcu drogi - tam tylko jedno gospodarstwo wygląda na zamieszkałe. Wcześniej jest ich więcej, zmieniam.
Krzysztof
eggie (2020-06-25 13:12:20+00:00): Dag Laurens
Svp geen spatie in de postcode zetten.
het formaat in OSM is 2036RS

MVG,
Eggie
AntMadeira (2020-06-25 20:50:34+00:00): Olá, Reino Baptista.
Podes dizer-me por que motivo apagaste o parque de merendas do Lapedo?
Reino Baptista (2020-06-26 08:55:07+00:00): AntMadeira,
Não foi intencional. Foi por descuido ao redefinir melhor a extensão da mata ao separá-la dos nós da ribeira do Sirol. Estou já a tentar repor tal como existia, sem ter de desfazer todo o changeset.
RB
Reino Baptista (2020-06-26 09:09:41+00:00): Neste momento já está reposto o parque de merendas tal como existia previamente.
AntMadeira (2020-06-27 20:43:54+00:00): Obrigado, Reino Baptista.
Já agora, aproveito para dizer que a extensão da mata não será bem essa. Não sei se te baseaste em alguma fonte, mas a mata ocupa os dois lados do vale e não se estende tanto para sul, onde é só pinhal. Ainda não me dediquei muito a essa zona, apesar de ter corrigido muita coisa, mas a área da mata não tem propriamente um nome, sendo que Vale do Lapedo se refere precisamente ao vale cársico e não à área florestada.

Cumprimentos,
António.
Reino Baptista (2020-06-28 09:21:58+00:00): António,

Já alterei o nome do vale retirando-o da mata e criando uma nova linha: "name=Vale do Lapedo;
natural=valley" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820373367#map=17/39.76095/-8.72719) de acordo com o descrito na secção Mapping de (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvalley) para vales em "V".

Quanto à extensão da mata para sul. Da observação das imagens satélite Bing, Google e ESRI parece-me ser tudo bosque, (que poderá de pinheiros) mas não vejo sinais de plantação de árvores pelo menos até à estrada "Rua da Aboleira". Para sul desta via está "forest" de "needleleaved" tal como a desenhaste. Naturalmente que estás à vontade para fazer qualquer alteração que melhore a representação da realidade.

Para norte da Ribeira do Sirol a cobertura vegetal mais me parece "scrub" que "wood" e ainda não está representada.

RB
AntMadeira (2020-06-28 14:25:21+00:00): Obrigado pela criação do vale. Penso que será o mais correto para designar aquela zona. Quanto ao bosque, na verdade ele só existe a norte da EN 350 e ocupa ambas as margens, sendo mais extenso a sul. Tudo o resto é maioritariamente pinhal. A norte do ribeiro, pode parecer mais "scrub", mas é a mata típica dos vales cársicos, com carrascos, zambujeiros, medronheiros, carvalhos, loureiros, com o ocasional pinheiro. 
A wiki diz que a linha do vale deve sobrepor-se à linha do ribeiro, o que aqui se justifica, por ser um vale realmente fechado e com o ribeiro bem definido no fundo em V, mas não te estejas a maçar com isso. Está bem melhor do que estava e eu um dia destes dou-lhe alguns ajustes.

Cumprimentos,
António.
Carto'Cité (2022-09-30 08:57:02+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
Te rappelle-tu pourquoi tu as ajouté un panneau voie verte sur cet aménagement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819451859. On ne le voit pas sur la photo Mapillary :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=452984632879718
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Truchin (2022-10-03 09:01:26+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
J'imagine que je l'ai vu sur le terrain si je l'ai ajouté explicitement. Mais ca comment à être un peu vieux...

Thomas
Carto'Cité (2022-10-03 09:55:22+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. Je le laisse alors.
Charles
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-09-13 21:19:17+00:00): Schon wieder beschädigte Relationen! Wann hörst du auf damit?
Cascafico (2020-06-25 20:30:11+00:00): Se devi fare aggiustamenti a punti di percorso importanti come questo, se li cancelli (come hai fatto) c'è il rischio che interrompi parecchi percorsi di bus. Ti conviene spostare i vertici. L'aver leggermente rimpiccoilito la rotatoia non vale il rischio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87141461
user_11166885 (2020-06-26 08:18:53+00:00): Grazie per l'avverimento
Lachgast (2020-06-25 13:04:40+00:00): Ik ben bij het plaatsen van deze wijzigingen gestuit op een aantal conflicten rondom de buslijnen ter plaatse. Ik heb deze zo goed als mogelijk proberen te verbeteren, maar het lijkt toch niet helemaal te kloppen.
eggie (2020-06-25 14:55:24+00:00): Zou het even aan Leo Slager vragen..
Gr eggie
Lachgast (2020-06-25 17:12:51+00:00): Dank. Ik zit nu een beetje bladeren, maar alle busroutes lopen gewoon door. Ik vermoed dat het dus goed zit.
eggie (2020-06-25 13:07:22+00:00): Oke.. Nu rendert het.
In het vervolg  graag de info van het kadaster laten staan svp
source	BAG	
source:date	2014-03-24

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 13:10:35+00:00): source =BAG hersteld
source:date stond er nog..
eggie (2020-06-25 13:39:02+00:00): Oke... Staat er echt een bord voetgangers verboden op het MTB pad?
Zou kunnen natuurlijk.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 13:16:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-06-25 15:35:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys [], no verifiable data []or not positive verifiable address data [x]). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
DP24PH (2020-06-25 13:55:12+00:00): Change logs:
1. Fixes on Bus Routes E, 2, 18, and 24 (including hex codes for colours); and select Modern PUV Routes
2. Bus stop and platform fixes per PTv2
3. Extension of Bus Route E to PITX

#Mapping101 Thursdays S1 E004: https://www.facebook.com/DearPaulPH/videos/264782611523236/

Papercut Fix Reference: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/64

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
eggie (2020-06-25 13:27:59+00:00): Beste pvand,
Probeer nu eens die regel te vinden waar je commentaar kwijt kunt. Lokale mappers willen echt weten wat je aan het doen bent.
Verder .. wat is de bedoeling. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 14:35:40+00:00): Winkels worden uitsluitend op de adresnodes getagd
Hier voor had je er een enorme "puinhoop" van gemaakt. Alles is qweer hersteld.. een reactie blijft verder uit.
Nu allemaal vlakken op het net herstelde gebouw met indoor= room shop=supermarked.. Waar vind je dit in de wiki om zo winkels te taggen
Ik overweeg de changeset weer terug te draaien.
eggie (2020-06-25 14:38:29+00:00): reverted by changeset #87146338
wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
eggie
rarad74 (2020-06-29 13:02:19+00:00): Hi.
Why you made separate lanes when there is no phisical separation betwen them? Why not put all tags. Why you ignore all turn restrictions from initial road? This must be undone.
rarad74 (2020-06-29 13:03:06+00:00): You guys , even do not know what to do on this map in order to destroy it?
*Martin* (2020-07-13 05:36:00+00:00): Hello. You hhave placed fords on nodes shared by both highway and stream. Did you survey it that those are really fords and not eg. culverts?
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-07-13 15:22:56+00:00): Hi,
Mostly, we use Maxar Premium Imagery (which tends to be the freshest imagery) and from those images we clearly see that there are no culverts. 
In case the image is vague we don't change anything. If we have an intersection between a stream and track for example we classify it as a ford. 
Please let us know if you think we have to improve something.
Thank you for your understanding.
*Martin* (2020-07-13 15:49:38+00:00): Hello,

I have checked Maxar Premiom and even much better source in Slovakia - Ortofotomozaika SR (for example https://www.freemap.sk/?map=20/48.987681/22.449477&layers=Z) and no doubt you can't see a culvert. The problem is that to see a culvert you must be looking from a sinde, not from a top as every aerial imagery is about.

I think ford (water flowing across a road) is much easier to see in such otrhophotos than culvert, but I saw no fords in Maxar Premium. In Ortofotomozaika SR I saw either clear road without water or areas covered by trees or shadow.

I think you should revert such ford tagging unless you did a local survey.

In Slovakia we have many nodes sharing both waterway and highway which are not fords. Those were mapped by mapper "Mirecnet" because of his lack of correct mapping knowledge.

Thanks in advance
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-07-14 17:47:41+00:00): Hello,

The source you have indicated above (Ortofotomozaika SR) is a good one indeed.
Thank you very much for the suggestions and for the advice. Sharing your experience will help us to achieve better results.
Frans S (2020-06-25 17:15:49+00:00): kan ik ook een bericht naar een ander sturen?
@franswillem
user_5359 (2020-06-25 15:17:14+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the key payment:NICOS and payment:UC?
swytel (2020-09-04 01:00:30+00:00): Thanks for your comment and sorry for my late reply．I intended to mean that they accept NICOS and UC credit cards (both of them are Japanese credit card brands), but I will delete them since they are not officially listed in OSM wiki.
user_5359 (2020-09-13 14:02:16+00:00): Hi, sorry about the delay. Feel free to add this cards in the wiki page, but please use lowercase letters. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_UFJ_NICOS, for the UC card I didn't find similar page.
brunesto (2020-09-14 11:12:19+00:00): Hello, I see lots of turn restrictions around 
47.7611139, 16.4416523 . 
can I replace them by 2 no left turns from the main road to the smaller road?
Bigmura (2020-09-14 12:11:41+00:00): I did not know thats a problem. 
Gmirkweg between Lange Gasse and B50 (819477673  and 819477672 ) is simply not allowed to drive on except for bycicle and farmers.
Luzandro (2020-09-14 16:47:35+00:00): It's sufficient to set the corresponding access tags on Gmirkweg. If you can't take the way at all this implicitly means you can't turn there from any direction.

On the other hand for bicycles or agricultural vehicles it IS allowed to make a right turn, which would be forbidden by your restrictions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

There are also a few turn restrictions on admin borders instead of the highways, so I will try to clean this up a bit.
brunesto (2020-09-14 19:11:56+00:00): I was planning to do it tomorrow morning but I see it is already fixed, Thanks :)
Ger20 (2020-06-25 14:24:35+00:00): There is a point on the building. Not sure if that needs to be removed too.
MKnight (2020-06-25 19:16:30+00:00): Moin, der von Dir benannte Herderbrunnen heisst ganz sicher nicht so, wie man aus der zugehörigen Note interpolieren kann.
Ich habe das soeben rückgängig gemacht.
Steube (2020-07-30 10:12:54+00:00): Die Öffnungszeiten wurden leider am falschen - noch nicht existenten Gebäude - getaggt. Vergleiche meine Hinweise zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72970121. Könntest Du das bitte berichtigen?
Steube (2020-07-31 16:06:26+00:00): Okay. Hab's erledigt.
◪ Jarv (2020-06-26 14:28:07+00:00): Don't really think that "highway=unclassified" is suitable for this or the other entrance road.
Unclassified typically means it is a public road, that is a through route or leads to multiple destinations.
This road just appears to be leading to a school, and as such would be better suited as "highway=service", previously it was marked as "highway=track" and  "tracktype=grade1", which does mean fully paved, so wasn't incorrectly mapped.

Also it appears to be a public bridleway so should also have "designation=public_bridleway"
Killick477 (2020-06-26 17:56:53+00:00): Ok, still learning my way around OSM, will change as suggested.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-28 16:03:17+00:00): I know it was ages ago, but it looks like this cased a problem with the Morocco relation.
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/3630439 suggests that this re-added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8692572 (Parsley Island) as an inner to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 (Morocco).
There's a note on the Parsley Island way "Claimed by both Morocco and Spain. Neither claim recognized by other party. Since an armed conflict in 2002 between the parties, it remains unpopulated, and both sides agreed not to occupy it. Spain claims the island as part of the municipality of Ceuta."
Best Regards,
Andy
Flurps (2020-06-28 20:10:16+00:00): Please be careful merging way segments. This broke a fairly large local relation and damaged another.

Fixing relations is far more time consuming, and the general guideline is to generally avoiding 'optimizing' ways.
eggie (2020-06-25 15:17:39+00:00): Lijkt mij oke.. Nu rendert de naam tenminste.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 18:58:34+00:00): Wellicht heb je nog zin die spelfout eruit te halen uit 3e Poellaan.. Niet jouw fout overigens
Zit even niet in de editor.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 21:33:56+00:00): Straatnaam hersteld 3e Poellaan
- l te weinig
NM$L (2020-06-26 03:57:15+00:00): We all focus on this contradiction. There are roads according to the lastest image of MAXAR which your news gives. Please restore these changes.
sandip_2 (2020-06-26 07:13:15+00:00): Hi, no roads are visible on imagery in OSM. But, yes, you can add, if you see any. You can edit it and add anytime if you want.
Thank you.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 09:50:16+00:00): I must agree. The roads are there as per satellite imagery. Please restore what NM$L created
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 09:51:01+00:00): See latest satellite imagery by MAXAR. Bing used old images
sandip_2 (2020-06-26 09:55:17+00:00): how to restore?
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 10:08:04+00:00): NM$L. Could you recreate them?
sandip_2 (2020-06-26 10:10:26+00:00): o then i mistakenly deleted it. But I dnt have latest imagery. You can kind create it. thanks so much.
sandip_2 (2020-06-26 10:21:00+00:00): NM$L  please recreate it. may be it was a misjudgement
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 11:45:29+00:00): But NM$L, please observe that the road stops short of the triangle as in this 22nd June MAXAR image. Brown paved road.
https://twitter.com/ajaishukla/status/1275781480896016390?s=09
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 11:49:32+00:00): It does not go all the way up to the river bend
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 16:06:46+00:00): I have revert the changes of Changeset: 87147370 back to what NM$L created
NM$L (2020-06-27 04:13:29+00:00): Thanks for recrating! I'm sorry I didn't see your discussion bocause of the jet lag
. And I think the road shuold be connected to the Galwan Highway (810638915) because it is also along the Galwan River and there seems to be no other places to build ways to connect them. But I can't really find any evidence to create it. Thanks again.
NM$L (2020-06-27 04:24:02+00:00): Re: It does not go all the way up to the river bend.
From a satellite image whose shooting range is wide and the location of the Chinese diggers, tents and etc. Indian media's pics says, at least, the road is along the bank of the river in this part.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-27 04:44:09+00:00): Sorry for sharing the twitter message as it might not be appropriate. Here is a clearer image of the area, from a neutral source: 
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-26/china-structures-built-on-india-border-ladakh-kashmir-dispute/12394664

I am able to see brown paved road and vehicles stops before the peninsula.
If you have a later image, showing the road has been made till the tip or diggers and vehicles in the peninsula area, please do share and we can update for sure.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-27 04:55:11+00:00): That being said, NM$L please go ahead and make the corrections you feel are true to the imagery.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-27 05:08:31+00:00): NM$L you seem to be right. Based on historical images able to see Vehicular road. I have marked as Tertiary Road with unpaved surface. 

Hope its correct now.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-27 06:12:32+00:00): I mean track road, due to tracks visible.
NM$L (2020-06-29 04:31:33+00:00): OK, thank you.
skquinn (2020-06-25 19:06:34+00:00): Looks like this is mainly adding paths, why not "adding paths" for the changeset comment (which actually tells us this) instead of "misc edits" (which doesn't really tell us anything)?
VLD159 (2021-05-19 18:20:26+00:00): Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. Based on the imagery source that you used, Bing aerial imagery, the playground feature that you edited (Way 819508864),doesn’t exist in imagery. Do you happen to have local knowledge for this area?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony
literan (2020-06-25 17:24:44+00:00): мы наносим на карту имеющиеся "на земле" объекты. "Начало маршрута" к таким не относится, придется удалить.
lyctkel (2020-06-27 12:26:54+00:00): Hoi Kannegieter,
Het wissen van de pad is nog niet afgesloten. Ik zie er nog een lijn maar zonder eigenschapen. Deze lijn moet ook nog worden verwijdert.
Maar op den satelite images von Esri World Imagery zie ik dat de pad misschien een pad met surface=grass is. Die zijn soms moeilijk te herkennen in de zomer. Is dat mogelijk? In dat gefal graag highway=path, surface=grass invulllen.
Groet,
lyctkel
SHARCRASH (2020-08-01 13:24:36+00:00): Hello! Why do you change the tagging as governement whereas you are then creating a building area over anotehr one, redndering building where there is no building? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172587274/history
FeiGei (2020-08-01 13:53:35+00:00): HI! Excuse me, but I'm rather new to OSM editing. If I remember correctly the tag was not correct so I changed it, and the whole block was set to the same, so I tried separating the retail part. Unfortunately, I do not know how to check my edits exactly to explain what I did.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-01 14:22:28+00:00): OK i see, thank you, but it was already correct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
eggie (2020-06-25 17:12:54+00:00): Lijkt me oke... Zodra je opeens een heel groot edit gebied ziet heb je iets vastgeplakt aan een grens, landuse, residential. In dit geval aan de toponym... 
Zie hier.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87148751
Gr eggie
Kannegieter (2020-06-25 17:19:10+00:00): Oke ik snap het. 
De ALT-knop werkt niet in mijn geval aangezien ik een Chromebook gebruik.
eggie (2020-06-25 18:19:19+00:00): Oke.. wellicht weet iemand op het forum de oplossing. Maar we gebruiken allemaal eigenlijk josm... Daar is het de ctrl toets die plakken voorkomt.
Op het forum ben je van harte welkom. Je kunt je toevoegen in het draadje ..wie wat waar..
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 21:15:58+00:00): Zowel footway als path zou moeten routeren ...  foot-yes hoeft niet, kwaad kan het niet. het is al default.
Zie defaulttags osm Nederland http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Alecs01 (2020-06-25 19:00:54+00:00): Ciao, non usare le immagini di Bing per tracciare/spostare edifici, in Italia sono recenti ma molto male allineate, te ne accorgi mettendole a confronto con le tracce gps o altre fonti (es. carta tecnica regionale). Meglio le immagini "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta", puoi selezionarle dal menu sulla destra.
ecomuseogorno (2020-06-25 19:27:59+00:00): Grazie del suggerimento. 
Quindi devo riposizionare in funzione di Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta?
Alecs01 (2020-06-25 20:30:00+00:00): Ciao, sì esatto, in Italia sono in generale molto migliori anche se più vecchie. Se in zona ci sono anche tracce gps che aiutano, meglio ancora.