piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-01-24 10:52:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Rainero (2021-01-25 22:31:32+00:00): Hallo siwica,
die Adresse, die du hier bei der Kohlschütter-Apotheke hinzugefügt hast, kann nicht stimmen, hier ist die Kohlschütterstraße 9. Damit würde der Name der Apotheke zwar zur Straße passen, aber im Steinweg 25 ist diese Kohlschütter-Apotheke schon eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410946074.
Was ist nun richtig? 
Kannst du das Rätsel aufklären und die Apotheke(n) korrigieren?

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
gscholz (2021-01-31 06:50:59+00:00): Hi Iglesias,
your recent changeset have added several errors to the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-61.94762&lat=-17.00063&zoom=8&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you probably know, unconnected ways can not be used by routing software.

Can you please fix this?

I heavily recommend you use JOSM as  editor as it shows error messages if you try to upload this kind of errors.

Kind Regards
Guido
karson_ (2021-01-24 17:41:01+00:00): The auditor's site still shows a road easement here. Are you sure it isn't a class B or C service road? In that case it should be marked highway=track.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98041987
t0spmad (2021-01-24 21:53:03+00:00): I ran back there last year and it was hard to navigate on foot.  It's at the end of a rock road that is mostly a driveway for that farmhouse on the south side of SW 80th Avenue.  It dead ends because of IA-5 to the North.  I wouldn't be able to drive my car (mini cooper) on it.  You could probably drive a truck on it, but I could drive a truck through a field.
eggie (2021-01-24 07:26:10+00:00): Dag Elllyver.. 
Bedankt voor de toevoegingen. 
In OSM taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Dan is adres en info gekoppeld.
Met een reguliere editor als iD en/of JOSM gaat dat het beste.

MVG
eggie
ian727 (2021-08-12 18:38:37+00:00): Cannot verify those track in any way.
skifans (2021-01-27 18:47:45+00:00): Sorry I've got this wrong, its signed as "5 Tons". Should it be "5 lt" based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units#Explicit_specifications? Looks like without a unit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight?uselang=en Tonnes is the default? Although this whole Ton/Tonnes ect. is rather confusing!
MacLondon (2021-02-12 02:41:27+00:00): Hi. I've adjusted the tagging here to "maxweight:imperial=5 ton" which might reduce confusion between ton/tonne.
user_5359 (2021-01-24 06:01:58+00:00): Hello! It is not a good idea to write all "translations" of a city name at each address instead of keeping it central to the description of the city.
user_11332999 (2021-01-28 23:04:45+00:00): Hello. I corrected it and reduced it to "addr:city".
tguen (2021-08-31 07:31:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899351810 was imported on a construction site where I previously deleted a building. Is construction complete, or is this the old building being re-added?
Zian Choy (2021-06-01 19:48:58+00:00): In changeset 96198961 and this changeset (98042776), you added a destination tag ("Poway;Escondido") to the CA 56 East on-ramp from the northbound side of El Camino Real.

What is the source for the information? I can't find those city names when I look at the street signs.

It may be better to leave off the tag, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground.
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:20:25+00:00): There was a sign at this location that preceded the construction of the California 56 Freeway that remained in place therafter.   Not sure if it was placed by the City or by Caltrans
iWowik (2021-01-25 07:48:12+00:00): А чего это абсолютно все домики, находящиеся в СНТ "Солнечный берег-1" имеют адрес 
СНТ "Солнечный берег-2"?
Пример https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8349009759
Sowa1980 (2021-01-25 20:32:18+00:00): Уже другое дело замечание по делу исправил смотри. Спасибо!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97246002#map=14/54.4874/100.5666
iWowik (2021-01-26 09:16:45+00:00): А ничего, что https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8349037133
вылез за границу за "абсолютно точную границу СНТ"?
Или таки эта граница не так уж абсолютно и точна?
Sowa1980 (2021-01-26 14:55:53+00:00): не успел еще от рисовать , и замапить , отдельно участок.
iWowik (2021-01-26 17:30:43+00:00): Ясно
tguen (2021-05-06 05:46:29+00:00): Please be careful when importing data. RLIS is not always accurate. For example, this changeset added a building on top of the tennis courts at Roosevelt High School. RLIS data indicates the house was built in 1921, so it must have been torn down before the courts were built.
user_5359 (2021-01-24 08:18:54+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12IX: What is the meaning of the key nguồn ?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:14:37+00:00): This feature doesn't exist and has been removed.  Please do not add features that do not exist.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-21 15:52:19+00:00): Existen estas restricciones? parecen ficticias.
Glassman (2021-01-24 16:31:40+00:00): There doesn't appear to be any signs to indicate this is a service road. The county has designated this as NE 48th St. I do agree this is not a county or city maintained road. So why change to service from residential?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98043923
av8ffej (2021-01-25 05:02:46+00:00): Great question. I debated changing it to driveway. My primary reasoning was that it isn't depicted on Bellevue GIS as even being a street. The King County GIS shows that the parcels on it are actually a 140th address, ergo 48th St isn't actually a residential street. 

I ran it this afternoon and need to make a change to the loop because it isn't actually a loop. That southern segment is actually the driveway on the white roofed house. I will edit the segments to driveway from service road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98043923
ovruni (2021-01-24 06:22:55+00:00): Hola, he notado que ha estado ingresando etiquetas como man_made=archaeological_site, man_made=path y ahora una vía con man_made=body. Este tema se ha discutido en la lista de correos y se ha sugerido el uso de man_made=geoglyph. [0] Por favor participe e indique el motivo que tuvo para ingresar las otras etiquetas.
Saludos
[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-January/000877.html
c tito young (2021-02-22 05:07:00+00:00): These have all be updated to be tagged correctly.  If there are any still with the wrong tags, they will be changed, but I think they all should be right now.
clay_c (2021-02-05 00:07:48+00:00): Hi JPinAR,

It looks like you've changed the names of various roads in Bentonville to numbers like 25, 35, 45, etc. Was this intentional? Are those meant to be speed limits?

-Clay
JPinAR (2021-02-05 15:03:13+00:00): Clay, I did intend for those to be speed limit changes and didn't catch that I had in advertently changed names on some as well. I went back and found the two changesets I did this in and reverted back the names and moved the speed limits to the correct place so that information was not lost.See change set 98775635. (I did run and Overpass Turbo query to ensure I got all the changes. As clicking through all them in iD editor was becoming a chore and I didn't want to leave anything hanging.
clay_c (2021-02-05 16:52:50+00:00): No worries. Thanks for changing it back.

As for trying to tag me in replies (as you mentioned in a private message), no need - I get an email notification for every reply to a changesets conversation I've participated in. I don't think OSM supports tagging users in changeset comments like that.

-Clay
Fypsi (2021-01-25 10:43:28+00:00): The Wikidata ID is already at the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10543333 !
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:40:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2021-01-25 10:01:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki and use only these - only well-defined tags can be understood by other mappers and can be shown on maps and in applications.

Let us know in case you need help!
moreno96 (2021-01-24 06:50:20+00:00): سلام
شما چرا اقدام به حذف عوارض، اون هم در همچین محدوده وسیعی میکنید؟
تغییرات قبلی شما هم بررسی شده، که متاسفانه به نظر میرسه کار شما خرابکاری باشه
03142 (2021-01-24 07:03:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97593603#map=10/33.1272/50.9052

http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=820873589

تغیرات پی در پی نام شهر به علویچه و علی گیجه ، اضافه کردن بی مورد نام شهر به جاده ها و ...
اقدام خرابکارانه است؟ یا تصحیح جاده ها 

اکانت های بلاک شده :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alirezaee2

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/omid10

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Alavijeh+%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AC%D9%87%E2%80%AD/Najafabad+%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%81%E2%80%8C+%D8%A2%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF%E2%80%AD/@32.8984194,50.9144641,9.92z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3fbe1ebaa6957f13:0x5059e7e3e11a2453!2m2

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Alavijeh+%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AC%D9%87%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.0093186,50.7865807,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3fbe1ebaa6957f13:0x5059e7e3e11a2453!2m2!1d51.0697274!2d33

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Khansar+%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.196187,50.2219212,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3f953dd629f25cf3:0x91d95b2a82554e48!2m2!1d50.3172249

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Golpayegan+%DA%AF%D9%84%D9%BE%D8%A7%D9%8A%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.1086419,50.7046702,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3f94df1592b9945f:0xdf54bbef714ee14f!2m2!1d5
Ebrahim Nejati (2021-01-24 07:05:13+00:00): سلام
میشه توضیح بدید چرا بدون بحث قبلی به چنین وسعت از عوارض رو حذف می‌کنید؟
03142 (2021-01-24 07:17:10+00:00): سلام
بحث مدت  زیادی که وجود داره
عوارض حذف نشده فقط تصحیح میشه که دوباره ریورت میشه
03142 (2021-01-24 07:18:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97593603#map=10/33.1272/50.9052
03142 (2021-01-24 07:24:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90607495

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538329245/history

اقدامات خرابکارنه با اکانت قبلی
03142 (2021-01-24 07:25:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538326702/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538326709/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538326704/history
03142 (2021-01-24 07:34:31+00:00): حذف کردن نام خیابان ها در چند ماه اخیر 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538341364/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833842656/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538326759/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538326649/history
moreno96 (2021-01-24 07:45:32+00:00): دقیقا در همین چنجستی که داریم بحث میکنیم، ۲۵۰ عارضه حذف کردید، چطور میگید چیزی رو حرف نکردید؟
03142 (2021-01-24 08:06:07+00:00): شما اصل قضیه را بیخیال شدی 
هیستوری چنجست هایی که حذف شدند را مشاهده کنید 
در اصل نام جاده تغییر کرده  و تگ عوض شده
kiaraSh-Q (2021-01-24 09:52:09+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. شما نه توضیحی روی چنجستهاتون میدین و نه منبعی ذکر میکنین و در ابعاد وسیع اقدام به تغییر و حذف عوارض میکنین که این کار نمیتونه درست باشه. لطفاً سعی کنین برای هر چنجست یک کامنت و توضیح منطقی بذارین و منبعی که تغییرات رو بر اساس اون منبع ایجاد میکنین رو هم ذکر کنین.
whb (2021-01-24 13:04:55+00:00): Wurde die Änderung der Haltestellenpositionen mit Ortskenntnis vorgenommen?
Wenn nein, auf welcher Grundlage wurden diese vorgenommen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4915083412/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2601211047/history
whb (2021-01-24 13:59:19+00:00): Diese Haltestellen liegen auch ca. 100m daneben und deren Position entspricht erstaunlicherweise der anderer Datenbanken...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4915116439/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8356548097/history
wies1 (2021-05-05 06:24:46+00:00): Hallo,
bei der Haltestelle "Heßloch Hillesheimer Straße" konnte ich via dem OSM History Viewer Pewu die frühere Position dieser Haltestelle sehen. Jetzt bitte ich Dich um DEine Hilfe. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit in JOSM die Haltestelle genau auf die frühere Position (Location-Angabe) zurückzusetzen? Etwa durch eine Eingabe? Wenn ich die Haltestelle verschiebe entsprechend der Bildansicht in PEWU habe ich ja nicht die Gewähr, dass ich genau die Stelle treffe, an welcher sie früher war.
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2021-05-05 06:30:58+00:00): Hallo,
bei der Haltestelle "Dorn Dürkheim Bahnhof" gilt dasselbe, wie oben. Laut PEWU gab der ursprüngliche Mapper, der die Haltestelle gesetzt hatte an die Position der Haltestelle nur geschätzt zu haben. Hm, sollte man in diesem Fall überhaupt etwas an der derzeit aktuellen Position ändern?
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2021-05-05 06:35:33+00:00): Hallo,
nochmal zu "Dorn Dürkheim Bahnhof". Welche anderen Datenbänke sprichst Du an?
Gruss
wies1
mavl (2021-01-26 16:05:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок затрагивает частную территорию.  
  
Вы посещали это место?  
  
В OpenStreetMap нужно добавлять данные из совместимого источника. 

По ссылке, которую вы указали, данные защищены авторским правом: 

Copyright © 2012-2021 Аэрокомплексы  
  
Также нужно добавлять проверяемые данные.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C  

Вы проверили эти данные? Как другие участники могут их проверить?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Omri Shaked (2021-02-10 21:03:36+00:00): Hey DoctorSpeck, trying to understand why you removed some relations and added other relations that point to the same shapes?  For example, relation 206660 was deleted and 1633328 added to replace it.
DoctorSpeck (2021-02-12 23:38:36+00:00): Hi Omri,
The short answer is that 206660 and 1633328 were duplicate relations as they both described the same thing-- the Independent City of Fredericksburg (more on this later) and I did not create a new relation (1633328) It was already existing.

The long version is that Virginia has a weird way of dealing with "Cities" in the law. For all legal purposes they are a combined County and City (admin_level=6) in OSM boundary terms. In many places in the state they had been mapped as duplicated relations, one for admin_level=6 which is normally for county, and one for admin_level=8 which is for incorporated towns & cities. Duplicating them is incorrect in terms of OSM. -- One feature per item. The more correct practice is to map Independent cities as a boundary relation with boundary=administrative, admin_level=6, place=city and optionally border_type=city. Also if a city lies totally within the bounds of a surrounding county its borders should be added to the county's relation with role of inner.

If you have further questions regarding this changeset or others feel free to ask and I'll do my best to answer.
Omri Shaked (2021-02-13 01:02:29+00:00): Thanks, I appreciate the answer!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:40:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Langlaeufer (2021-06-24 12:07:39+00:00): Hi Enno.
ich denke es war eine deiner ersten Änderungen - sie leider keine Verbesserung. Auch ein gepflasterte Weg ist vom Tracktype 1. 
access=no ist nicht sinnvoll zu setzten, mit motor_vehicle=aggricultural waren bereits alle Einschränkungen korrekt beschrieben. Radfahrer Fußgänger, Reiter sind standardmäßig von der Nutzung nicht ausgeschlossen.
Langlaeufer (2021-06-24 12:11:05+00:00): smoothness und name waren natürlich eine Bereicherung
olo81 (2021-08-18 20:38:17+00:00): Dodałeś do płatnego parkingu dostępność Access=yes 
ten tag się wyklucza z płatnym parkowaniem
olo81 (2021-08-18 20:38:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741961561
C2oc4 (2021-10-17 07:01:17+00:00): private ?
olo81 (2021-10-17 15:09:55+00:00): Już dawno to poprawiłem
access=customers
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:26:21+00:00): Dzięki
Colbertson (2021-01-24 14:08:07+00:00): "sat tracing" but what imagery?
richlv (2021-01-24 18:46:26+00:00): Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at https://www.lvmgeo.lv/dati .
alesarrett (2021-01-31 06:37:11+00:00): Ciao, qui ovviamente non c'è nessun castello. Se era solamente un test di mappatura, puoi cercare di editare piccole cose realmente esistenti. Se sai come fare, puoi cancellarlo tu. Altrimenti in mattinata lo cancello io.
Grazie
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-01 09:39:34+00:00): Vous avez transformé ceci en lien de fitness ? est-ce normal ?
opendcc (2021-01-24 20:44:27+00:00): :-)  http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12Kl
uvi (2021-01-26 16:32:07+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
danke für das nette Smiley. Nur was willt du mir damit sagen? Etwa, dass der Fehler in Bayern noch sehr oft (nahezu fächendeckend) auftritt? Eigentlich schade, zumal Abkürzungen vermieden werden sollen und die Abkürzung "FFW" für "Freiwillige Feuerwehr" nach DIN 14033 falsch ist. Richtig wäre FF. 
Gruß Uwe
opendcc (2021-01-26 19:33:40+00:00): Ich habe eine overpass Abfrage dazu gehängt. Hier bei mir in der Umgebung habe ich schon ziemlich aufräumt und ich freue mich, wenn es Mitstreiter gibt.
uvi (2021-01-27 04:28:27+00:00): Das klingt gut. Den Norden Deutschlands habe ich schon aufgeräumt. Da war aber auch nicht so viel zu tun. In Bayern ist es tatsächlich flächendeckend, aber wir werden das schaffen ;)
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
ivan_kaut (2021-01-24 09:28:40+00:00): Антін Сартенченко, Здрастуйте, ви можете прокоментувати причину видалення тега loc_name? Ця назва в Росії відомо понад 10 років.
ivan_kaut (2021-01-24 09:31:16+00:00): Як приклад: https://www.rbc.ru/society/03/03/2011/5703e42f9a79473c0df1b09c
OrDal (2021-01-24 12:33:54+00:00): Hi,
What are these ways tagged "boundary=administrative" mean?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899405100
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899405099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899405098
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-24 18:36:23+00:00): Oh sorry. That was a mistake.  I should have deleted that before saving the edits.

(These are parts of the municipal boundaries of these towns and villages)

Thank you for catching that.
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-24 18:38:37+00:00): I've deleted them.  Sorry about this mistake.
aTarom (2024-03-24 10:24:06+00:00): Hi, això es un guidepost (Psl=Pal?), una font amb nom Psl?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8356769818/history
philippec (2021-01-24 19:26:49+00:00): U zit nog aan de verkeerde poort.
Op 1 van mijn foto's is ten Westen geen dak te zien.  Kijk dan naar de 10 cm satellietfoto.
Vergelijk eventueel met de vroegere mapillary zonder aed.  Ik heb daar nog les gegeven.
eggie (2021-01-24 10:23:21+00:00): Dag Pieter,

Je hebt een voetpad toegevoegd waar niemand mag komen. Verboden toegang. Klopt dat wel access=no  Dus beter die regel verwijderen. 
De straat naam zal niet zijn "verbinding park-"
Haal je die naam ook weg?
Verder heb je de landuse gras  verwijderd.
Is daar niets?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-24 10:25:08+00:00): Waarom heb je van de Kersenberg een wandelpad gemaakt?
eggie (2021-01-24 10:31:29+00:00): Waarom zet je het fietspad op slot langs de Lelieberg en de Heulberg?
Je hebt het ook in een wandelpad veranderd?
Routeren doet het helaas allemaal niet meer.
Ere loopt zelf een knooppunt fietsroute 91 -92 hier??
Ik overweeg je bijdrage terug te draaien.
eggie (2021-01-24 10:37:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #98049496

Je edits zijn zo ongeloofwaardig dat ik je bjdrage heb teruggedraaid.
Foietspaden zijn niet opeens voetpaden geworden hier
Neem svp eerst contact op voordat je verder vernielingen toebrengt aan de kaart. Dan kunnen we evt. assisteren bij toekomstige toevoegingen.
MVG
eggie
jimkats (2021-05-17 22:00:02+00:00): Τώρα το είδα αααα, γιατί αφαίρεσες το area tag? Και αναρωτιόμουν γιατί σε 3d δεν το εμφανίζει :p
map per (2021-01-25 15:21:49+00:00): Hello kavousion,

the village Jachenau was already mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3113308538, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/71582021). Why did you map it a second time?

Looking forward to hearing from you
map per
kavousion (2021-01-26 08:59:17+00:00): Hello,

sorry I did not see the 1st Jachenau. I deleten mine.
map per (2021-01-26 10:12:37+00:00): Hallo kavousion,

der E-Mail Spam Ordner kann manchmal nervig sein.

Das Problem an der Jachenau hast du mit dem Löschen nicht gelöst. Dort wo du erst das Dorf Jachenau eingezeichnet und später gelöscht hast war vorher der Weiler "Dorf" eingezeichnet. Um deine Änderung rückgängig zu machen müsstest du dort also wieder einen place=hamlet namens "Dorf" einzeichnen.

Beim Reparieren deiner bisherigen Änderungen kann folgendes hilfreich sein. In OSM werden alle Änderungen protokolliert. Du kannst dir also anzeigen lassen, welche Tags Objekte im verlauf der Zeit hatten.
In ID, dem Karteneditor, den du benutzt kann man, wenn man ein Objekt ausgewählt hat unten links auf den Knopf "Auf openstreetmap.org ansehen" gehen. Auf der damit aufgerufenen Seite kannst du dann wieder unten links auf "Verlauf anzeigen" klicken, um den Tagverlauf des Objektes einsehen zu können. (Da dein Editor auf Englisch eingestellt ist werden die Knöpfe ein wenig anders heißen (Woher weiß ich das? - Steht im Changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98048825)))

Die history des Weilers "Dorf" sieht beispielsweise so aus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3113308538/history). Mit den Informaton aus der History kannst den Weiler "Dorf" in OSM wider einzutragen.

Viele Grüße
map per