piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
indigomc (2016-10-02 08:27:27+00:00): Hi 

I'm assuming you are aware of deleting some perfectly good roads in Mysore, such as Sayyaji Rao Road. You have also made a number of additions that do not seem to be of the appropriate quality. Please do not experiment with the map, this will be treated as vandalism. You can get feedback at the forum or the mailing lists (see wiki for guidance). I will revert your recent changes.
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622992 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533510, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623141 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533578, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:37:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533601, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623149 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533622, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623153 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533648, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623157 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533695, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552721 where the changeset comment is: revert 77 changesets by user midhu ks after they were found to damage the map in India; no response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42533979 question yet but speedy revert deemed best solution
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623159 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533833, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623180 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533860, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
mapper999 (2016-10-01 16:20:08+00:00): Hi,
please be more careful when adding tags, you added some misspelled building tags in this edit. Please check and correct them. (Found via http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4424559152 )
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623185 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533904, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623189 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533937, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
PlaneMad (2016-09-30 19:01:40+00:00): Hi midhu, welcome to OSM. Noticed that you have been deleting a lot of the map data and adding fictional features like this. Please explain your edits or your contributions will be reverted immideately.
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:39:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623195 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42533986, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
indigomc (2016-10-01 18:55:06+00:00): Hi. Your edits a day ago around KR circle in Bangalore have resulted in a number of strange mapping results, including crossing and duplicate roads, a 'bridge' tag to part of Sheshadri Road which I don't believe is justified, and unconnected roads. Could you revisit this please as soon as possible please?
ToniE (2017-03-31 12:56:14+00:00): Hallo,

eigentlich bin ich ja über den Namen eines Radweges im nördlichen Englischen Garten gestolpert "Effnerstraße" und habe mich gefragt, wieso das geht: große Auffallstraße beginnend am Arabellapark und Radweg hier mit dem selben Namen.

Aber eigentlich macht mich auch der Changeset-Comment stutzig:
Wie sieht es bei Deiner Quelle mit dem Copyright aus. Daten dürfen nicht aus copyright-geschützten Werken (Google, andere Karten, Bücher, ...) stammen. Es sei denn das der Autor das explizit erlaubt.
Ich befürchte, Deine Quelle ist nicht ganz konform mit dieser Regel, oder?
Auch wenn's  ein "Amtlicher Führer" ist, was steht denn auf den ersten Seite bzgl. Copyright, ...?

Viele Grüße,
Toni
Nakaner (2016-10-01 14:16:08+00:00): Hallo Nzara,

warum hast du in diesem Änderungssatz flächenhafte Points of Interest gelöscht? Ich bitte um eine aussagekräftige Begründung. Andernfalls stelle ich den vorherigen Zustand wieder her.

Vor einigen Wochen habe ich dich gebeten, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare zu verwenden, die deine Änderungen beschreiben und begründen. Die OSM-Community erwartet es von dir. Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41856980

In meinen Augen genügt die Beschreibung "refine Zürich HB Zwischengeschoss" nicht, das Löschen flächenhafter Points of Interest zu begründen. Wenn du etwas an den Läden auszusetzen hat, dann be schreibe das bitte im Änderungssatzkommentar genauer und kommentiere auch den Änderungssatz der Person, die die flächenhaften POIs eingetragen hat. Dasselbe gilt auch für das unbegründete Löschen von Fußwegen in Bahnhöfen, z.B. Olten. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41473401) Es tut mir leid, dass ich mich im Falle Oltens nicht schon damals lautstark bei dir beschwert habe, sondern nur den Mapper, der die Fußwege eingetragen hat, auf deine Löschungen hingewiesen habe.

Es scheint mir ein wenig, als wäre dir die Firma Mentz (ich bin nicht mit dieser Firma wirtschaftlich verbunden – im Gegenteil, ich beobachte sie kritisch) ein Dorn im Auge.

Dies ist meine letzte Verwarnung bezüglich deiner Änderungssatzkommentare und deiner Löschungen. Sollte diese Verwarnung keine Wirkung zeigen, sehe ich mich genötigt, die Data Working Group um entsprechende Maßnahmen bitten.

Solltest du mein Verhalten unangemessen finden, so darfst du dich gerne selbst auf der Mailingliste Talk-ch um Vermittlung bitten oder dich selbst bei der DWG beschweren.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nzara (2016-10-01 14:34:20+00:00): Die flächenhaften POI entsprachen nicht (mehr) der Realität. Sie sind durch aktuelle punktförmige POI ersetzt. Ich war vor wenigen Tagen vor Ort.
Nakaner (2016-10-01 14:35:55+00:00): Kannst du das bitte etwas genauer ausführen? Wie hast du die Daten erhoben?
Nzara (2016-10-01 17:24:55+00:00): Ich bin daran vorbei gelaufen und habe sie mit den OSM-Daten verglichen. Unterstützt hat mich ein Prospekt zum Shopping-Angebot im Bahnhof.
datendelphin (2016-10-01 19:09:30+00:00): Nehmen wir als Beispiel die Mc Clean Toilette. Die hast du doch am genau gleichen Ort belassen wie die Fläche. Somit entsprach die Fläche doch einigermassen der Realität?
Nzara (2016-10-03 06:18:35+00:00): Für McClean und andere POI, deren Position noch aktuell war, war das nicht wirklich zwingend und auf den üblichen Renderern sieht man auch keinen Unterschied. 
Die flächigen POIs waren im wesentlichen als Rechtecke ausgeführt. Diese hatten zu der dem POI zurechenbaren Fläche teilweise deutliche Unterschiede in Form und Grösse. Sie waren geeignet um den POI zu positionieren aber irreführend in Bezug auf Form und Grösse. Sie in einen punktförmigen POI umzuwandeln habe ich nicht als Informationsverlust gesehen. Dabei habe ich auch die übrigen POI umgewandelt, deren Form die Realität angemessen wiedergeben haben. Das war nicht nötig und übereifrig. Aber auch hier habe ich keine wirklichen Informationsverlust gesehen.

Ziel meiner Änderung war die Realität besser abzubilden. Falls die lokale Comunity findet, der ursprüngliche Zustand bildet die Realität besser ab, sollte der ursprüngliche Zustand selbstverständlich wiederhergestellt werden. 

BTW: Im Nachhinein ist mir aufgefallen, dass noch einige Treppen zu den Perrons fehlen (und damit Verbindungen zwischen Perron und Passage). Leider habe ich das letzte Mal darauf nicht genügend geachtet, um sie in Lage und Grösse realistisch nachtragen zu können. Aber im HB komme ich oft genug vorbei ;-)
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:21:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Andrea Musuruane (2016-09-30 12:32:51+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Lo stadio Silvio Piola è già mappato. Perché l'hai aggiunto come punto? Inoltre, il numero civico deve essere inserito in corrispondenza dell'accesso (e non in mezzo al campo di gioco). Ciao, Andrea
streinger (2016-09-30 09:03:17+00:00): На каждой станции должна быть только одна метка railway=station,
Станция называется Оренбург, а не ж/д вокзал(это скорее local_name)

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:railway=station?uselang=ru
LorenzoStucchi (2020-06-18 17:03:22+00:00): Ciao, ho visto l'elemento che hai inserito, cosa intendi con power=riparazione pc?
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-30 08:47:01+00:00): Poprawił stryjek siekierkę na kijek.
OpenStreetMap-WP (2016-10-03 08:52:18+00:00): Ojej
FredrikLindseth (2017-09-18 16:29:12+00:00): De veiene som er tegnet som barrier=ditch, skulle de egnetlig vært highway=service? Antar du ikke har flyttet noen bunkers her, ref "bunkers=flyttet" ?
Владимир К (2016-10-03 06:57:45+00:00): отмечено некорректно, вс
Владимир К (2016-10-03 06:58:15+00:00): всё удаляю. Хотите внести офис, добро пожаловать в нормальные редакторы.
EinKonstanzer (2016-09-30 14:05:44+00:00): Ich sehe da keine Furt. Bitte beachten, dass ford=yes nur für die Stelle gedacht ist, an der die Furt ist. Betrifft auch die anderen Änderungssätze. Ev. copy & paste ???
Luuuddooo (2016-10-02 13:01:21+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a un soucis, vous avez importé des bâtiments déjà importés, et dont l'alignement n'a pas été corrigé par rapport aux images aériennes.
Luuuddooo (2016-10-03 23:19:17+00:00): J'ai annulé vos modifications.
Thorwald (2016-09-30 09:26:42+00:00): This is what my intention was: To separate the three places and to name them like: 
1. Store Furuøya naturreservat
2. Randvik naturreservat
3. Leikerøya naturreservat

I changed the name on Store Furuøya (down to the left), and now i have changed name on all three of them, in one operation. It seems to me like they are linked or something. This was not my intention and I would like some help. Maybe to undo this change.

Help, anyone?
Hjart (2016-09-30 09:18:41+00:00): Please note that this is really just an adress, not a building
aharvey (2018-09-01 13:08:51+00:00): Hi, I noticed this changeset added subway=yes to a lot of features, unfortunately Tag:subway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:subway is undocumented on the wiki so could you please describe what you understand subway=yes to indicate and how it us used globally, is it used by any data consumers?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metros does describe "Metros" as "a rapid transit train system" which use railway=subway and station=subway, but these stations here are not Metros/rapid transit, they are regular heavy railway.

I have a tendency to go with this description that they are not subways, they are underground as per the location=underground tag already.
aharvey (2018-09-01 13:20:56+00:00): I opened the thread https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-September/038787.html
aharvey (2018-09-02 13:57:30+00:00): I've removed the subway tag as per feedback on that thread, subway in OSM means metro which means mass rapid transit. These stations are for regular heavy rail.
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-08 07:13:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45907040 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth usage
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:22:06+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-01 06:35:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 
If you want to mark a company, please set a node to the main building.
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-13 08:08:02+00:00): 1816 atkarpa tarp Žiežmarių ir Pastrėvio gatvės tikrai pilnai išasfaltuota? LAKD duomenys sako, kad ne.
mavl (2016-09-30 18:41:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили для резервуаров наименование «Резервуар». Это не наименование.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Vvs2 (2016-10-02 09:24:44+00:00): Спасибо за правку!
manoharuss (2016-11-14 05:43:01+00:00): Hi MisterOblivious,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are appreciated. I have observed that you have deleted tracks in this changeset saying "Excessive mapping on private property". These tracks definitely exits on the imagery and I do not see how this big an area could be a private property. But deletion is not the right way in the case. If the area is private and the ways are access restricted, you can add `access=permissive` or `access=private`. You can read more about use of access tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). When access tag is present, routing services like OSRM do not route through the area which is what you would like here. Deleting the data is not the solution. Let me know what you think. Feel free to reply. Would be great if you undo your deletions here.

Best,
Manohar
Saikat Maiti (2016-09-30 10:32:14+00:00): Add #roads and #buildings
user_5359 (2016-09-30 16:57:14+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Zur einer Adresse gehören im Minimum Hausnummer und(!) Straße. Bitte noch nachtragen, alles andere kann berechnet werden.
EugenyN (2016-09-30 11:06:00+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы удалили купель.  Там её больше нет ?
SomeoneElse (2016-10-04 22:35:56+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Unfortunately, something went wrong here - you managed to change the whole island into a commercial building. It's not your fault - there's a problem with the app that you've been given to map the island (I've already been talking to Colleen about that). Please don't use it for mapping until the problems are fixed.
If you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch, either with me directly through OSM, or with the Data Working Group via data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Commodoortje (2016-10-05 09:36:11+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Ik heb de 2 poi's op een betere positie geplaatst. Tevens heb ik wat aanvullende tags geplaatst.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.