piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:17:19+00:00): See also the recent discussion (in Polish) regarding tagging of overlapping parks and forests: <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=873605#p873605>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:02+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:04+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:07+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:09+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:12+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:14+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
gscscnd (2022-10-24 12:16:16+00:00): Reverted, see <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127950133#c937110>.
fndoder (2022-10-23 14:26:51+00:00): Вы удалили лестницу вниз с надземного перехода, хотя она существует.

Прошу вернуть обратно.
fndoder (2022-10-27 15:26:02+00:00): Ладно, вернул 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128135235
Jillis inactivE (2022-10-23 11:31:49+00:00): Hi, inderdaad erg toevallig. Maar goed dat ik er niet speciaal voor gereisd heb ;-)
Maar de survey_dates staan nog op 2022-08-23?
multimodaal (2022-10-23 22:48:49+00:00): Bedankt voor je opmerkzaamheid. Had in de haast een typo gemaakt, is nu gecorrigeerd (-:
Igor Bubelov (2023-07-30 12:17:33+00:00): FYI: https://github.com/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/issues/4764
o_andras (2022-11-13 02:30:33+00:00): Semelhante ao changeset anterior (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127951672), que tipo de tanque/reservatório é este?

Pedia também que usasses comentários mais descritivos nos changesets. Para uma melhor ideia, lê esta página na wiki (actualmente apenas em Inglês): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128832319
o_andras (2022-11-13 02:25:20+00:00): Olá, novamente usa por favor as imagens de satélite mais recentes (2021) quando possível.

Como não dá para perceber o que isto é mesmo nas imagens de satélite mais recentes, que tipo de tanque/reservatório é este? Segundo os tags que usaste é usado apenas para emergências, como por exemplo no combate a incêndios. É esse o seu propósito?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128832249
o_andras (2022-11-13 02:10:42+00:00): Olá, quando possível, usa por favor as imagens de satélite mais recentes (2021). E o tag `leisure=swimming_pool` é usado exclusivamente para a piscina em si, isto é, o espaço que contém água, não inclui a área circundante.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128832150
abakus_uploader (2022-10-23 22:32:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Pierre C2B (2022-10-23 16:47:31+00:00): modifications commerces Grand'rue
Erlen Dur (2022-10-24 16:41:31+00:00): Hello abakus_uploader,

I am totally aware of complete directions and I do add them, when possible. But in this case, there is NO street mentioned on their facebook page. Please have a look at yourself. The address is just "Ślepie 9, Olecko gmina, Poland". 
In this case, I just changed the tag addr: city to addr: place as you advised.
But I don´t really get the difference but good to know. 
You know, I am a mapper and in my opinion it is more important to add things, even if there might be some wrong or incomplete tags. I mean, it is not really wrong, city or place, I  don't get it. It is really nit-picky and I get, why beginners get frustrated with all this overwhelming rules the OSM community implemented. The debates I read in some forums are just crazy.
In the end, mapping should be fun but I have the feeling, that this community is really too much focused in small details. 
But no worries, I am learning step by step, how to map correctly. But I am not willing to spend hours and hours to read through wiki articles and forums. If sometimes something is unclear, I look it up. I did that already many times  and I learned a lot. But it is really confusing sometimes.
However, thanks for letting me know. 
Cheers, Andre
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 10:06:10+00:00): Hall Daniel,
grade1 (befestigt) steht im Widerspruch zu gravel. Kanns du das nochmal prüfen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127953009
Daniel22Ka (2022-10-24 11:56:27+00:00): Moin 
War der Weg schon eingegeben ? 
Ich war da vorbei weil ich dort in der Nähe war. 
Ansonsten wieder korrigieren
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 14:03:48+00:00): Der Weg war ohne tracktype mit surface=gravel eingetragen (sollte also vermutlich  tracktype=grade2 sein).
Du hast jetzt tracktype=grade1 dazu geschrieben. Die Frage war, ob du dir sicher bist (evtl. sogar die Oberfläche kennst) oder ob ich grade2 eintragen soll?
Daniel22Ka (2022-10-24 14:07:02+00:00): Befestigter Schotterweg war es,
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 14:21:10+00:00): Dann ist grade2 die richtige Wahl. Hab es geändert.
NieWnen (2022-10-24 13:31:11+00:00): grodziski.e-mapa.net odpowiedzieli, że zostanie poprawione w najbliższym czasie na nazwę ul. "Pawia".
rhhs (2023-04-14 15:29:12+00:00): Hello, is this road still closed? Someone asked me if the Snezhanka cave is reachable. Google Maps shows that it's open
rhhs (2023-04-15 10:45:52+00:00): Here https://peshterainfo.com/%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D1%8A%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5-%D0%BA%D1%8A%D0%BC-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BA-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0-%D1%81%D0%B5/ it's stated that it will last until 20th November, so I assume it's open now. Hope smoothness can be set to excellent?
ivanatora (2023-04-18 16:40:37+00:00): Yeah, I think repairs finished some time ago. 
Can't say of the smoothness, though. Expect to be good, but only a survey can tell :)
bkil (2022-11-21 22:46:14+00:00): Köszönjük a csövezést! Szeretném kérdezni, hogy honnan származik a név amire átnevezted? A Budafok-Solymárvölgy kivitelezői dokumentációkból származott. Esetleg láttad táblán valahol? Illetve a nyomvonalat hogyan állítottad elő ahogy verifikálni tudjuk? A többi szakaszt személyesen felkerestük és a közismert gázobjektumokkal együtt vittük fel illetve a légifelvételek segítségével https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Cs%C3%B6vez%C3%A9s
Bálint (2022-11-22 10:34:30+00:00): Szia, ha jól emlékszem, a budapesti területrendezési terv alapján dolgoztam, abban nagy felbontásban, meglévő tereptárgyakhoz (utak, épületek, erdei ösvények) jól köthető útvonalon szerepelt a nyomvonal. Hogy a név is szerepelt-e rajta vagy az csak leíró jellegű, azt már nem tudom.
bkil (2022-11-22 11:45:22+00:00): Sajnos a budapesti rendezési terv tracing-jéhez nincs engedélyünk, azt nem használhatod sem te, se más aki ellenőrizné a szerkesztésedet forrásként. Kérlek helyezz az érintett entitásokra valami olyasmit, hogy `fixme=resurvey proof` és/vagy járd be felszíni bizonyítékok után kutatva. Illetve szeretettel várunk a következő térképezőbulinkra: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20221201 https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20221209
bkil (2022-12-11 20:43:16+00:00): Számíthatunk rá, hogy ráteszed a fixme-t az összes olyan entitásra amit nem megengedett forrásból szerkesztettél?
Bálint (2022-12-11 22:12:32+00:00): visszaállítottam inkább a korábbi állapotot, úgy a tiszta
bkil (2022-12-12 08:34:09+00:00): Rendben. És szintén várunk sok szeretettel a csőmérésre januárban: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20230121
catdreamer (2023-07-13 07:42:56+00:00): 這一段一直以來都是路徑不明的路段，為何會變成良好？
captainbest125 (2023-07-14 13:22:54+00:00): 我走覺得良好清晰，沿路很多布條和三角鐵版，台東林區感理處和嘉明湖步道的布條。
rhtb0 (2022-10-23 11:53:30+00:00): 안녕하세요
실제 공원이 아닌 사유지에 공원이라고 편집하시는 의도가 무엇인가요?
포켓몬고 공원을 추가하기 위해서인가요
사유지에 공원을 추가하시면 이 정보를 가지고 직접 찾아가는 사람도 실제로 존재합니다.
공원을 추가하시려면 이름이 있는 공원(서울숲)을 추가해 주세요
rhtb0 (2022-10-23 11:55:25+00:00): 창동 상상길은 공원이 아니라 그냥 테마거리고 시장인데 공원인가요?
창동 소녀상은 동상이지만 공원인가요?
rhtb0 (2022-10-23 12:02:21+00:00): 포켓스탑은 게임에서 직접 신청해서 늘릴 수 있습니다. 이 지도 사이트 말고요
poketstopmaker (2022-10-23 22:56:31+00:00): 창동 소녀상 부근은 공원처럼 구성되어 있습니다.
adlid (2022-10-23 18:00:43+00:00): Hi, the amended speed limits on these roads are incorrect. The local unit for maxspeed is mph and a signed speed limit in mph should not be converted to kph, as  the conversion is imprecise (e.g. 30 kph is not equal to 20 mph).

Also, please could you provide useful changeset titles rather than a random combination of d, f and g. The title should at least specify the basic changes made.
eggie (2022-10-24 11:44:31+00:00): Hi hoan   You are asking for feedback.
Your edits might be okay, but your comment is 'fffggg'?
Whats does it mean?

Greetz,
eggie
Warin61 (2022-10-25 02:51:02+00:00): Many of these no longer exist. Tagging them 'disused' and 'abandoned' means they  are still there... and that is not the case.. they are gone, vaporized, vanished, no trace...
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-25 05:15:25+00:00): Disused means they are still there, abandoned means the tracks have been removed but the right-of-way is still discernable, whilst razed means there is no trace.

For enthusiasts wanting to know where a railway was, all of these tags are helpful. If they shouldn't be tagged as razed, why is razed an option?
Warin61 (2022-10-25 07:06:57+00:00): Repeat...

Most of these tracks are no longer here... why have you mapped them as  'disused' and 'abandoned'?


The only section that I can see with some existence are on the peir, as there don't connect with anything I'd think ruins may be the best OSM description of them.. personally - remnants?
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-25 07:17:26+00:00): I thought I explained that. Mapping them as disused, abandoned and razed gives them visibility on OpenRailwayMaps which is where rail enthusiasts go to find where railway tracks are and once were. (https://www.openrailwaymap.org/index.php) They don't show up on OpenStreetMaps so it won't confuse those users.
Warin61 (2022-10-25 07:45:37+00:00): I have raise the question of why the tag razed (and others) exist in OSM on the talk list, I have suggest that the OSM wiki recommend moving things with these tags to OHM.
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-25 07:51:11+00:00): OHM doesn't overlay former rail tracks onto current conditions as far as I can tell, so it wouldn't be as helpful. From what I've seen on OHM, not a lot of data exists at the moment.
Former railways are depicted on ORMs the world over, giving much material for rail enthusiasts to track former railways. I don't see why others would object to this, particularly as they don't show on OSM.
Warin61 (2022-10-25 08:03:21+00:00): The 'standard map' (for OSM editing) does show the disused and abandoned. I have no idea for other renders. 

However when I down load an area to map it .. the razed etc are also downloaded. 
This is a problem when people try to map new things, the old things lead to mapping things that never existed like railway=crossing where a new footway/highway is also mapped over a now non existent railway line.
People mapping new things may not see the old stuff on the new imagery .. and simply delete it, leading to edit wars.
People map things like an old embankment for old railway lines .. right through existing roads

A possible reason for these tags of things that no longer exist is for use in OHM, I have suggested making a change to the OSM wiki to state a 'recommendation that these things be move to OHM'.
Warin61 (2022-10-25 08:14:57+00:00): Oh .. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway#What_is_sufficient_to_map_a_former_railway

Much of this is the case of "without any traces whatsoever. Not mappable. " ...
Warin61 (2022-10-25 08:18:10+00:00): And now 
"Once there is no real risk of remapping them by person thinking that this objects are still existing such elements should be deleted from OSM." 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
tastrax (2022-10-26 09:56:32+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-October/087845.html
Warin61 (2022-10-27 06:36:44+00:00): I'm waiting for the list comments to die off and then suberise there .. leave that for a while to see if there are any comments on my summary and then add information to the OSM wiki .. contact ORM ... 

Note I have just made some more railway corrections to the ferry terminal (along with parking etc) 
A timelapse of the destruction/construction is https://ms-my.facebook.com/geelongadvertiser/videos/timelapse-corio-quay-taking-shape-for-spirit-of-tasmania/578741390375654/
Warin61 (2022-10-27 06:45:24+00:00): The tags of disused and abandoned look to render on the OSM standard maop ... at least as far as I can see..
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-27 06:49:12+00:00): Disused are rendered on the standard OSM as dotted grey lines, but abandoned and razed are not rendered.
Warin61 (2022-12-05 01:15:56+00:00): I have now summarised the tagging list discussions and entered text to explain the purpose of mapping non existent features in OSM on the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay

Note the words "Renders cannot rely on OSM preserving physically vanished history. "
syntex (2022-10-23 18:31:09+00:00): Raczej powinno być highway=construction
PT-53 (2022-10-23 15:46:27+00:00): Hallo laodzu,
Da hast an diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321478472/history
die Merkmale
- addr:street=Müllergasse   und
- addr:housenumber=9
eingetragen.
Diese Adresse gehört aber zu diesem Gebäude
-  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320816388/history
und ist somit falsch.
Bereinigst Du das oder soll ich das für Dich machen?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
laodzu (2022-10-23 17:07:38+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

na das ist ja mal lustig.  Vor dem Haus bin ich gestanden (die ganzen Änderungen habe ich mit StreetComplete vor Ort gemacht) und da hängt definitiv ein Schild mit einer 9 drauf dran. Ich frage nochmal vor Ort nach und bereinige das dann.

Vielen Dank fürs Aufpassen!
  Detlev
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-23 12:47:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 40208340, 42419599, 44161333, 70297055, 72153048.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-23 12:50:52+00:00): There are only 3 nodes here - in Tasmania, the eastern USA and Japan.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-23 13:53:06+00:00): + MP corrected
OilStation (2022-10-25 13:15:31+00:00): 请不要将道路连接到电线之类的路径上。
这样的数据质量将无法获得保障。
在绘制路径时，通过按住 Alt 键就能避免节点连接到其他要素。
上传更改时请尽量修复系统所提示的“错误和警告”，某些错误可能会导致地图软件无法正常导航。
您的贡献我都看在眼里，但还烦请抽空多参阅网页编辑器内的帮助文档，谢谢！
eggie (2022-10-24 12:14:05+00:00): Please comment your edits properly
habi (2023-06-29 08:58:28+00:00): Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106328831/ erfasst.
In den swisstopo Luftfotos und laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3755978 ist das Gebäude nicht da.
Du erwähnst den GWR und das amtliche Strassenverzeichtnis, kannst du etwas mehr zu dem Stand des Gebäudes sagen?
PuffinMapper (2023-06-29 12:05:34+00:00): Soweit ich sehe, gibt es dieses Gebäude inzwischen nicht mehr. Entfernen was es nicht mehr gibt passt. Ist ja bereits entfernt.
Generell müsste man wohl den Stadtplatz noch anschauen, da hat sich einiges getan. Auch bezüglich Sommerbeiz.
habi (2023-06-30 11:49:43+00:00): Anhand der Notiz und der Luftbilder ist es nicht da, deshalb habe ich das Gebäude entfernt.
Ich frage mich nur, ob das vor 8 Monaten im GWR war, das du als Quelle angibst.
PuffinMapper (2023-06-30 13:16:04+00:00): Ja, damals wars noch drin, ebenso in der amtlichen Vermessung. Auf den Zeitrahmen und die Lokalität bezogen, jedoch sehr gut möglich dass in dieser Zeit einiges gegangen ist.
GerdP (2022-10-23 13:17:45+00:00): Oops, ich meinte natürlich Klein Köhren und nicht Kleinenkneten!
Konkon153 (2022-10-23 13:19:54+00:00): [ und damit alle 261 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Gallin vollständig angepasst ]
marc__marc (2023-04-10 20:19:14+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10123841427
que veux dire surface=yes ?
Cordialement,
Marc
TedScouGV (2023-04-10 21:04:09+00:00):  Bonsoir Marc, Joyeuses Pâques. Je ne sais plus pourquoi, surtout que toutes les autres places PMR autour de l'EHPAD de Ménez Kergoff où notre maman est depuis bientôt 3 ans et demi ne comportent pas cet attribut. Je rectifie donc celui-ci et vérifie les autres alentours. Je te tiens au courant. Comment fais-tu pour détecter de telles "anomalies" ? Noz vad, kenav'henta.  P. S. : d'où es-tu ?
Benoît C MdP (2022-10-31 09:08:31+00:00): Bonjour Vardyger,

Pourquoi avoir supprimé la bande cyclable à contresens de l'avenue de la porte d'Orléans https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549011850 ? Elle existe toujours pourtant.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Vardyger (2022-10-31 14:02:32+00:00): Effectivement j'ai du faire une erreur avec StreetComplete, merci d'avoir corrigé !

Bonne continuation
eggie (2022-10-24 11:45:41+00:00): What do you mean with ddffffddfffggg as comment at your uploads. Please comment your edits properly.
Greetz,
eggie
highflyer74 (2022-10-25 05:08:24+00:00): Moin!

Ein kleiner Hinweis: die von dir verwendete App Go Map!! produziert sehr leicht doppelte Punkte an gleich Stelle. Versuche bitte, beim Editieren besonders darauf zu achten. Ich habe es hier repariert.

Dann noch: wenn hier Häuser im Bau sind (also der Bau begonnen hat) wäre es ein landuse=construction.

Viele Grüße!
bjay999 (2022-10-25 18:56:35+00:00): Moin highflyer74,

vielen Dank für deine Hinweise.

Gruß BJay
Juan Carlos G F (2022-10-25 11:33:46+00:00): Hola, quería saber si es una fuente de agua potable. Si es de uso público o privada. En primera instancia parece por las fotos aéreas que podría tratarse de un abrevadero para animales.

Un saludo.
escobrice (2022-10-25 13:16:19+00:00): Hola!
Es el típico caño que el agua cae a un bebedero. Si no pone nada (ninguna placa, aviso) yo presupongo que es potable. Otra cosa es que sea tratada o no. Respecto a pública, está en un camino sin vallar y sin carteles, asi que tambien supongo pública.
Juan Carlos G F (2022-10-25 13:31:35+00:00): Ok, gracias por la info.
Laci (2023-02-08 23:36:42+00:00): Hi, why did you change trunks into motorway links?
skyper (2022-11-09 14:33:23+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-15 16:37:45+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
skyper (2022-11-09 14:30:59+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-15 15:50:51+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
maicolgalante (2023-09-10 10:25:26+00:00): Ciao, ma la way 532936007 (e quella a cui si collega) cosa starebbe ad indicare?
rikmede (2023-09-10 15:13:41+00:00): Non ne ho idea, io avevo lavorato sulla relazione del sentiero 353. Probabilmente ho spostato qualche nodo e segna la modifica anche per la way 532936007. 
In ogni caso mi sembrano due "path" completamente errati...non mi pare che ci siano sentieri sul campanile! :D
skyper (2022-11-09 14:32:19+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-15 16:21:16+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
skyper (2022-11-09 14:31:51+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-15 16:12:14+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
Helium314 (2024-01-11 19:28:14+00:00): Hi,
du hast vom outdoor seating alle tags entfernt.
War das ein Fehler, oder gibts das nicht mehr (dann sollte es besser gelöscht werden)?
mapperich (2024-01-12 18:47:25+00:00): Hi,
da hätte ich die Wiki vorher lesen sollen. Habe es gelöscht weil ich dachte es wäre so doppelt gemappt. Hab es rückgängig gemacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
highflyer74 (2022-10-25 05:18:31+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Achte bitte beim Mappen auf möglichst große Präzision. Der Spielplatz überschnitt teilweise den Teich. Auch verbinde bitte keine Flächen mit Wegen. Der Spielplatz reicht in Wirklichkeit beispielsweise nicht bis an die Straßenmittellinie. Ich habe das entsprechend repariert.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich gern :-)

Viele Grüße!
tux67 (2022-10-25 06:22:22+00:00): Hi,
wenn du Wege beim mappen splitten musst, lädtst du in JOSM dann alle betroffenen Routen komplett runter? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128012120
Ich hab' nicht versucht herauszufinden, ob die Reparatur der Route wg. dieses CS war (JOSM kann das zumindest besser als iD - aber auch hier ist manueller Eingriff gefragt).
Gruß
tux67
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/relation-kaputt-edititiert-mit-id/2749/7
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127960099
Dennis Beckers (2022-10-25 07:46:34+00:00): Glaube zwar nicht das der fehler von mir stammt habe aber jetzt alle relationen die dort eine lücke hatten repariert.
tux67 (2022-10-25 08:04:51+00:00): Ok, danke. Ist etwas aufwändig das nachzuvollziehen, aber solange du dir der "Gefahr" bewusst bist ist ja alles gut. ...
canfe (2022-10-23 18:03:42+00:00): Perchè hai aggiunto il civico al nome della via?
Non può certo essere così.
Inoltre mi pare strano che sia unpaved. Non sarà asfaltata??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127960290
sailpool (2022-10-23 19:22:21+00:00): Ciao, ti ringrazio per le domande:

1) la strada non è asfaltata, o meglio: in alcuni punti è stata cementata, in altri il cemento di diversi anni fa si è completamente sgretolato, in altri ancora è semplice terra battuta e modellata dalle piogge → se c'è un tag migliore in questo caso lo modifico subito :)

2) Per la numerazione il motivo risiede nel fatto che la starda in questione non è "Via Tanaro" ma "Via Tanaro N°8" (come da indicazioni del cartello stradale) strada privata con numerazione completamente interna.

3) Ho rilevato altri errori riguardanti la strada al di sotto (sempre denominata "Via Tanaro") con le stesse caratteristiche del caso appena menzionato: anch'essa strada privata con numerazione esclusivamente interna. Ci sono inoltre errori nell'indicazione dei numeri civici sulla strada Via Tanaro (per le numerazioni 2 e 4).

Stavo valutando la correzione sulla mappa al punto 3
canfe (2022-10-25 05:05:23+00:00): Capito. Il fatto che riporti il civico non vuol dire che rispetti le regole per i DUG.
Togli il civico dal nome e magari riposiziona i civici già precedentemente mappati con un import dove davvero sono. Ti ricordo che vanno messi sull'entrata, in pratica dove c'è il campanello per suonare.
woodpeck (2022-10-23 20:56:47+00:00): Dear yopaseopor, you're making a lot of changes spanning all of Spain or even larger areas where your changeset comment is "#fastag" and your "source" is usually given as "OSM data and wiki" or so. 

If these are automated edits - where you use some rule to specify "all objects having these tags should (also) have these other tags", then this is an automated edit that needs to be discussed with the community before you execute it. You are expected to document these edits on the wiki. If you're not discussing these edits and not documenting them, and if they are automatic, then please stop them immediately.

In order for it to be *not* an automated edit, you have to review each changed object individually and make a decision. You would, for example, be expected to explain why in this changeset an industrial building that is not a supermarket (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901524671) has been tagged with a supermarket brand?