piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jacob's-Staff (2015-10-09 12:32:16+00:00): Also ich meinte das diese Relation type=building hier am sichersten ist: bisher brauchen die von mir angeschauten Renderer diese zwar nicht zwingend um die 3D-Infos zu rendern, aber so komplex wie dieses Untergrund-Zentrum wird, ist es glaube ich fair dem Renderer mitzuteilen, dass das Zentrum sich nur diesen Teilen der Relation zusammensetzt. Ob nun alle darin erfassten Teile gerechtfertigt sind, ist eine andere Diskussion ;)
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-08 19:00:39+00:00): Some maxspeed related changes in this changeset were reverted in changeset 33890248 because switching to kilometres instead of miles per hour for UK rail speed limits had not been discussed with the UK community.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-08 19:00:40+00:00): Some maxspeed related changes in this changeset were reverted in changeset 33890248 because switching to kilometres instead of miles per hour for UK rail speed limits had not been discussed with the UK community.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-08 19:00:41+00:00): Some maxspeed related changes in this changeset were reverted in changeset 33890248 because switching to kilometres instead of miles per hour for UK rail speed limits had not been discussed with the UK community.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-02-05 06:10:54+00:00): halo mr TuanIfan. i've change several tag service into residential. Way 840805481 around this area. its should be more appropriate . 
happy mapping
dieterdreist (2016-01-12 09:37:45+00:00): there are quite some problems with this (newbie / first edit): the housenumber is likely not valid for the whole polygon, as is the name and the name has also capitalization problems. The building:levels tag cannot have different values, you have to split the building into different building:parts in this case.
de vries (2015-08-29 09:25:41+00:00): Beste Jan Maat, 
mag ik je naar je bron vragen? Volgens mijn bron is de bestemming wel degelijk Maastricht;Eindhoven;Tilburg. 
bron: https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/3BvLzEGZAeEeezYqOghEDg/thumb-2048.jpg
mvg, de vries
Jan Maat (2015-08-29 15:43:50+00:00): Hallo,

De foto geeft niet de plek waar ik de verandering heb gedaan. Deze is eerder.

De bron ben ik zelf. Ik reed deze week van Utrecht naar Limburg en mijn Navigator app wilde me via de parallel weg laten rijden. Kan wel maar niet logisch. Op dit punt heb ik de bestemming aangepast omdat boven de parallel baan niet de bestemming staat Eindhoven Maastricht. Deze staat boven de midden (doorgaande) banen. Weet jij of de bestemming informatie ook van invloed is op de navigatie?

Groeten,

Jan
de vries (2015-08-29 16:26:21+00:00): Hoi, 
ik zag dat je nog niet heel veel bewerkingen op je naam hebt staan, dus ik wil allereerst zeggen: maak gerust fouten bij het bewerken, er zijn hier genoeg mensen die je willen helpen deze te herstellen. als je hulp zoekt kun je op het forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

De foto is van vlak voor het weg segment dat je bewerkt hebt. De informatie op de borden slaat dus op het stuk weg na de afrit. in destination tag schrijf je eigenlijk altijd precies wat er op de borden staat. zie ook: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination

Ik denk trouwens niet dat de destination tag invloed heeft op de navigatie. Anders was je bij knooppunt Empel wel naar de hoofdrijbaan gestuurd. zie: https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/5A3DlkG4yTnVvKE3XrjDHQ/thumb-2048.jpg en http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54318418#map=18/51.72965/5.31552
kijk maar eens op mapillary.com

ik denk dat je navigatie (welke app gebruik je eigenlijk?) je de parallelrijbaan op heeft gestuurd omdat die in de binnenbocht ligt en dus waarschijnlijk ietsjes korter is.

mvg
Jan Maat (2015-08-29 16:36:32+00:00): Hallo,
Ik gebruik de app MapFactor.
Hoe wordt mijn aanpassing verwijderd?
Groeten,
Jam
de vries (2015-08-29 19:41:31+00:00): aanpassingen kan je niet verwijderen, je kan het alleen nog een keer aanpassen. ik heb het al even voor je gedaan. Fijne avond verder

de vries
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:03:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 33638930, 33639027, 33639184, 33637094, 33638921, 33637618, 33638880, 33640961, 33639026, 33638878, 33639042, 33601948, 33639314, 33638840, 33639201, 33639655, 33637812, 33637617, 33641758, 33639120, 33639281, 33639253, 33641788, 33639262, 33639720, 33639041, 33639182, 33639378, 33639676, 33639351, 33637911, 33640962, 33637918, 33637089, 33637817, 33639363, 33638825, 33639260, 33639718, 33637913, 33638839, 33601949, 33639104, 33639682, 33639717, 33639678, 33639155, 33601963, 33638861, 33640602, 33639217, 33639083, 33638855, 33637632, 33638951, 33638923, 33640598, 33639699, 33639697, 33639309, 33639213, 33640948, 33639740, 33639280, 33637630, 33637465, 33639398, 33639254, 33638796, 33637882, 33639038, 33639185, 33637087, 33601967, 33639085, 33603527, 33640944, 33639150, 33639130, 33637518, 33639215, 33639202, 33639176, 33639246, 33639251, 33637520, 33638865, 33600307, 33639722, 33639355, 33639131, 33637877, 33637814, 33637526, 33638829, 33639101, 33638806, 33601822, 33641785, 33639117, 33639210, 33601966, 33641787, 33640940, 33601970, 33639243, 33641759, 33639054, 33639663, 33637910, 33639736, 33637914, 33637811, 33637622, 33639181, 33639021, 33639023, 33637467, 33640609, 33639381, 33637531, 33639362, 33639349, 33639028, 33639125, 33639660, 33639727, 33638843, 33641760, 33639347, 33639357, 33639689, 33639123, 33639189, 33639238, 33639646, 33639728, 33639214, 33637573, 33641784, 33637922, 33637096, 33637920, 33637516, 33638797, 33640960, 33639248, 33641781, 33638859, 33639235, 33639288, 33637620, 33637846, 33637517, 33641755, 33639037, 33638842, 33601864, 33639694, 33639360, 33639305, 33639128, 33639250, 33638826, 33640946, 33641783, 33637435, 33639724, 33601964, 33637515, 33637590, 33639695, 33639353, 33600337, 33639051, 33637605, 33638883, 33637906, 33639284, 33638863, 33639240, 33637923, 33639304, 33639187, 33639118, 33637512, 33641841, 33637521, 33640604, 33601863, 33637524, 33639256, 33637916, 33639212, 33639656, 33641747, 33641828, 33639186, 33641838, 33639312, 33603526, 33639384, 33639053, 33639364, 33603516, 33639352, 33637974, 33637594, 33641774, 33638926, 33638866, 33639013, 33638837, 33639708, 33641789, 33639382, 33637925, 33639359, 33640943, 33639236, 33639715, 33639653, 33641839, 33601969, 33637924, 33637093, 33637522, 33641770, 33639698, 33639657, 33639652, 33641823, 33601965, 33640949, 33639242, 33641750, 33639259, 33639282, 33638932, 33639733, 33639730, 33638877, 33639161, 33639223, 33637880, 33639247, 33638927, 33639684, 33639183, 33639080, 33638875, 33639221, 33639024, 33639206, 33638885, 33639377, 33640607, 33598811, 33637602, 33637821, 33637530, 33639204, 33637983, 33640945, 33637513, 33639675, 33639665, 33639714, 33637092, 33639650.
Nakaner (2015-08-30 20:42:03+00:00): Some parts of this reverts were done at changeset 33690643, not at this changeset!
chillly (2015-09-04 16:09:30+00:00): I think the dock has changed since the imagery was taken as Siemens are altering the dock as path of the Greenport Hull development. This edit may need reverting.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-08 19:00:42+00:00): Some maxspeed related changes in this changeset were reverted in changeset 33890248 because switching to kilometres instead of miles per hour for UK rail speed limits had not been discussed with the UK community.
Kakaner (2015-08-29 10:03:16+00:00): Wieso "Strecke"? Es geht um Routen.

Ich sehe in type=route keinen Bezug zu öffentlichem Verkehr.

Aber kein Problem, wenn ich Signale hinzufüge und das Routen-Tool brauche, ändere ich es wieder.

Wird also bis Dezember ein ewiger Edit-War werden. ;)
Kakaner (2015-08-29 10:04:20+00:00): Wie wäre es einfach mit einem access=no ?
Nakaner (2015-08-29 10:11:14+00:00): Auswerter erwarten bei Public-Transport-Routen keine access-Beschränkungen.

Pass einfach dein Routen-Tool an oder bau dir die Routenrelation lokal in JOSM und füttere es damit. AFAIK bietet es die Möglichkeit eigene Routenrelationen hochzuladen.
Kakaner (2015-08-29 10:13:09+00:00): Sollen sich doch die anderen Auswerter anpassen.
lakedistrict (2018-09-15 17:41:22+00:00): FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1517630
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-08 19:00:43+00:00): Some maxspeed related changes in this changeset were reverted in changeset 33890248 because switching to kilometres instead of miles per hour for UK rail speed limits had not been discussed with the UK community.
nexz (2015-08-29 11:01:30+00:00): Also added rail between Unirii and Piata Chirigiu
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-01 18:34:12+00:00): Dzięki za mapowanie kapliczek!

Zmieniłem wayside_shrineshelter na wayside_shrine, nie jestem pewien co zrobić z tym trzecim obiektem
Marych_ (2015-08-30 05:17:12+00:00): по данным 
http://webbogcha.uzedu.uz/index.php?page=main.php&id=28

502 на 10 квартале

Вы уверены?
M!dgard (2015-08-30 11:47:35+00:00): Salut Gamvik

Vous avez dessiné une nouvelle ligne, merci!

Vous n'avez ajouté aucun "tag", ainsi personne ne peut l'utiliser. Plus d'informations sur les tags se trouvent sur le wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

Cordialement, M!dgard
Alecs01 (2015-08-29 13:36:16+00:00): Ciao, non è un doppione di questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3486636794 ? se non ho visto male lì c'è una sola antenna
fick89 (2015-08-29 13:39:22+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per la segnalazione. In ogni caso non penso che sia un doppione in quanto c'è una piccola seconda antenna a sud-est di quella principale. Puoi verificare presso http://mappe.istella.it/it/?mm=3&x=9.292483175917575&y=45.58865361423806&z=5&yr=&or=NORTH&sm=gr&key=via%20prampolini%20monza
Comunque se risulta problematica la posso togliere.
Alecs01 (2015-08-29 13:52:45+00:00): no problem, se ce ne sono due va bene così, ciao!
fick89 (2015-08-29 13:53:40+00:00): Grazie. Buona giornata.
keithonearth (2017-12-15 21:40:13+00:00): I see this edit adds the name "Gue" to this village: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3004260144

I'm wondering where you got the name from? It sounds very Chinese, and not at all Ladakhi, though the Chinese name "巨哇" is pronounced "jùwā".
Papayaved (2017-12-16 14:04:47+00:00): Chinese name is fictional only for Chinese maps. In this village live Tibetans
keithonearth (2017-12-18 05:44:30+00:00): I understand that. I'm asking where did you learn the name "Gue"?
Papayaved (2017-12-18 06:12:42+00:00): http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/travel/go-away-to-gue/article4561440.ece
Papayaved (2017-12-18 06:13:39+00:00): https://i1.wp.com/themountainwalker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/gue-lama-mummy-04.jpg?resize=639%2C479&ssl=1
Papayaved (2017-12-18 06:14:49+00:00): http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-R92bUjQoSTc/U_mAAm576aI/AAAAAAAAG10/98-6Jy1IJTM/s1600/Blogspot%2BTabo%2B8.jpg
Papayaved (2017-12-18 06:17:19+00:00): https://www.tripadvisor.in/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g1156028-d1627236-i41083545-Gue_Mummy-Kaza_Lahaul_and_Spiti_District_Himachal_Pradesh.html
Papayaved (2017-12-18 06:19:39+00:00): It's popular tourist place and i was in this village too, but I did not photo gate of village
keithonearth (2017-12-18 22:18:50+00:00): Thanks Bhai :-) 

I wasn't trying to challenge you, just wondering where the info had come from. I do find it useful when people put that in the edit summery, and/or the source tag of the changeset. Just saying that you'd been there would have been more than sufficient. All the same, that article in The Hindu was really fascinating.

By the way is your profile picture you on an Enfield in the Ladakh, or Spiti, or someplace like that? Looks pretty awesome.
Papayaved (2017-12-19 04:22:15+00:00): It's Bajaj Avenger on the pass Pensi La by the way to Zanskar. Himalayas are a very beautiful place
keithonearth (2017-12-19 08:48:00+00:00): I had no idea Bajaj made such a cool looking bike. 

The Himalaya are very beautiful. I've been to Zanskar, and over the Pensi La too, but not for over 10 years. I was in Central Ladakh last summer, and I really love that part of the world. And would like to get back again. I've been mapping in Kashmir and Ladakh, while day dreaming about returning.
Lyubchenko Denis (2015-08-29 15:24:42+00:00): Две улицы Агропром
Алимбетов Ерлан (2015-08-31 07:24:08+00:00): там по факту 2 так и написано на табличках на улице, человек когда ходил в этом районе он так и отметил. это не ошибка
Jean-Marc Liotier (2015-08-31 08:29:19+00:00): Hello, thanks for finding this school. I took the liberty to fix the tagging: building=* is normally used for tagging individual building, not a whole compound. Also, schools must be tagged amenity=school. If you are aware of the type of school, Senegal has a national tagging scheme with school:SN=* which supplements the Openstreetmap school=* scheme. Thanks again !
tosky (2015-08-30 01:13:46+00:00): Please be careful with tests and playing with the live database. I removed the "sketch".
hadw (2017-01-09 15:06:50+00:00): This is not a 90 degree bend.  It is at least a 450 degree spiral, and I think it may even be an 820 or more one.  The adjacent service road is actually part of this ramp.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-02 08:25:01+00:00): Hi - a quick question about the new footpath.  How does it cross the service road at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368140495#map=19/52.98905/-1.63013 (there's no joining node)?  Also are you sure the south end exits where it does and not at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111354191 where there is or was a public footpath sign pointing northwest up a track?
tosky (2015-08-30 01:11:36+00:00): Questo changeset è stato rimosso perché ha introdotto delle vie chiaramente provienienti da tracce GPS, con meno dettagli e tali da rompere e sostitutuire dettagli esistenti (altre vie, rotatorie), se osmhv non inganna.
5m4u9 (2015-08-30 02:35:52+00:00): Para la próxima tener cuidado con romper límites administrativos de municipios y provincias. 

Pedir ayuda antes de saltarse la advertencia de que estás subiendo límites rotos.
5m4u9 (2015-08-30 02:21:08+00:00): acá un gran problema, cada calle que mapeaste debe OBLIGATORIAMENTE intersectar a otra que va por debajo excluyendo los ríos o pasos a desnivel. 

De nada servirá este mapeo porque todos los equipos de navegación y simulación de ruteo o movilidad urbana sólo verán que cada calle es una línea.

Solución: seleccionar ambas vías que se intersectan (sólo la vía no nodos) y presionar SHIFT+I en JOSM para crear la intersección.
streckenkundler (2015-08-29 17:34:35+00:00): Mist... da hab ich mit dem Changeset-Kommentar nicht aufgepasst... nir ein paar Waldflächen hinzugefügt...
GerdP (2015-11-09 08:18:19+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=track;path
is invalid:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296513044
Aerial images don't show the way, 
so it requires local knowledge to fix 
this.
Luzandro (2022-02-03 06:01:09+00:00): Hallo Volker,

du hast hier beim Parkplatz vom Motel Baden, wie auch bei einem Hofer Parkplatz access auf "destination" gesetzt, was bei einem Parkplatz für mich überhaupt keinen Sinn ergibt? Ich habe beides auf "customers" geändert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344154850/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39959264/history

LG Andreas
Volker Fröhlich (2022-02-03 23:29:39+00:00): Ja, wird besser sein so, danke!

Volker
Владимир К (2016-07-11 06:24:22+00:00): зачем в названии то мусорить
SomeoneElse (2015-09-14 12:13:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You may have noticed that this path isn't showing on any maps.  That's because you've not said what sort of feature it is.  In the editor click on it, type "footpath" into the big search box, and select "foot path" (the top entry) then save.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 07:37:33+00:00): This is incorrect tagging; the motorway is not yet complete.  Recommend highway=trunk, construction=motorway until the entire segment is upgraded, making it consistent with tagging usage in the US for trunks and motorways.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 07:37:52+00:00): This issue has been referred to talk-us and the data working group.
jakeroot (2015-09-02 08:04:14+00:00): Are you referring to the entirety of WA-500 as it exists between I-5 and Fourth Plain Blvd? Or just between the Andreson and St Johns junctions?
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-02 10:10:07+00:00): highway=trunk + construction=motorway isn't correct tagging.  That can break routing.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 10:10:56+00:00): I 5 to Fourth Plain.  construction=motorway shouldn't break routing because it's not highway=construction.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-02 10:12:22+00:00): Broke Mapquest Open routing when I did something similar on a road in the past.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-02 10:19:22+00:00): Because they picked up on the highway 'type' in the construction tag.  Anyways Paul, did you know that WSDOT considers what's tagged right now as a 'motorway'? http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/706FD0DF-CD12-42CD-9FEE-65545EF3F10B/0/Q14.pdf
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 10:22:15+00:00): What WSDOT considers it at what OSM considers it are two different things, the only country where the official classification and the OSM classification are congruent is the UK.  Essentially, if it's not interstate standard, it's likely not a motorway.  See the United States entry under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence
SomeoneElse (2015-09-02 10:40:58+00:00): Re "construction" confusing routers, I'm not seeing that at http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapquest_car&route=52.63936%2C-2.47228%3B52.63906%2C-2.47056 where http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121769393 has a construction tag.  Can anyone find somewhere where it does? I was using http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/beW to look for candidates.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-02 10:45:52+00:00): It happened in the past.  I guess they might have fixed that bug with their router.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-02 11:16:04+00:00): So, Paul, with the "if it's not interstate standard, it's likely not a motorway", are you going to go edit in NYC and change the 'non Interstate standard' segments on some of the Interstates that were grandfather in with I-# at the start of the system?  Or maybe change the 'Super-2' segment of I-93 where the 'Old Man of the Mountain' was down to Trunk?  Or how about PA I-376 Business Loop (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1014596) which is a 'motorway' for all but three small 'at-grade' intersections in the middle which between them, are tagged as trunk, while everything else is motorway.  Would you come into the Pittsburgh area and 'downgrade' it?  If you did, I'd fight you tooth and nail over any downgrade along I-376 Business.  Locals should hold a little more sway than people from out-of-state when it comes to this stuff.  Anyways, WA-500 looks almost exactly like PA I-376 Business Loop, and I support the way it's tagged at this given moment, especially since some locals say there are 'Freeway Entrance' signs at some of the onramps along it.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 11:21:40+00:00): No, because it's an exceptional situation in the Interstate cases you mention.  In the WA 500 instance, 3 at-grade intersections represents almost half of the junctions on the road, making it more consistent with OSM-US practice of tagging surface expressways as a trunk instead of as a motorway.  WA 500, as it stands today, has more in common with, say, US 75 north of OK 11, than, say, I 205 where it crosses WA 500.  In both cases, US 75 and WA 500 are a mix of at-grade intersections and grade-separated ramps.
Bickendan (2015-09-02 11:41:30+00:00): From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging: 
"Any freeway anywhere in the United States, whether designated Interstate or otherwise, gets highway=motorway." 
WSDOT considers WA 500 from I-5 to 42nd/Falk and from 54th/Stapleton to Fourth Plain/WA 503 as a freeway. These two segments are built to freeway standards -- four lanes, divided, shoulders a lane wide, speed limit of 55. The entrances to these segments are marked with "Freeway Entrance" signs. 
Furthermore, determining if a route is a freeway or trunk based on its length and number of interchanges and/or intersections is arbitrary and asinine, undermining the accuracy that OSM strives for and does a disservice for the end user. 
I honestly am not sure what the point of questioning the agency's definition of their own highways is. If WSDOT considers the two segments of WA 500 in contention as a freeway, both by the map linked to in thread above and quoted from their email in the other changeset thread, I submit it's very clear what these two segments is supposed to be. 

Comparisons to OR 224 aren't fair or even accurate -- OR 224 is by and large a Super-4 expressway, with the only twinned portions being with the interchanges with OR 99E and with SE Lake Rd. 
Also, US 26 southeast of Gresham, while intended to tie into the never built Mt Hood Freeway, doesn't really compare to WA 500, as it likewise only has one interchange (OR 212). 
Newberg-Dundee Bypass and Sunrise Corridor, once fully complete, will be freeways, but they're not issues at this time because both will only be Super-2s per their Phase 1 construction. 

Also, your comment, "It's kind of silly to suggest that WA 500 is of the same character as I 84," makes little sense - both I-84s are long-distance regional interstates with urban sections while WA 500 is purely an urban freeway with an expressway portion, setting aside the Orchards-Camas segment. That would be like downgrading CA 71 to trunk for its whole length because it's of a different character to I-10. 

Essentially, countermanding a state DOT's definition of a route doesn't make sense, particularly when that definition matches what exists in the field. Generalizing what a route is on a map that is striving for accuracy is a disservice to the map's integrity.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 11:56:41+00:00): WA 500 is, by and large, a super 4.  I'm not seeing any functional difference between 500 and 224.  OSM's definition as it's presently being used nationally with what is a trunk might differ from what a state's definition of what it may be.  It's normal for there to be some variation with the official definition of a classification and what OSM has it down as.  But if we're going to call WA 500 a motorway, we might as well call fourth Plain, Mill Plain, Saint James and Saint John's motorways as well, because fuck having different classifications, let's just upward creep the whole map.
Bickendan (2015-09-02 12:01:49+00:00): WA 500 is divided. It has two carriageways. 
Super-4's do not. OR 224 is a Super-4. 

The only crossover points on WA 500 are from where the concrete divider begins and ends at the left turn lanes for 42nd, and at 54th.
Bickendan (2015-09-02 12:03:30+00:00): So no, WA 500, in the segments in contention, is NOT a Super-4. It is a fully divided freeway.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 12:06:45+00:00): However, neither WA 500 or OR 224 are both fully controlled access (ie, grade seperated) and fully divided.  It's limited access (a combination of interstate style roadway with surface intersections) and fully divided, which would make it a textbook trunk candidate.
Bickendan (2015-09-02 12:24:36+00:00): Do not compare WA 500 to OR 224. They are apples to oranges. WA 500 is fully divided from I-5 to WA 503/Fourth Plain; you are incorrect in saying that it isn't. And again, you are attempting to generalize the road into a single category, which is cartographically dishonest for a map that strives to be as accurate as possible.
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-02 20:06:13+00:00): I'm saying the common usage for motorway has four parts:  High speed limit and all three of 1) full grade seperation, 2) multilane, 3) fully divided.  Any exceptions should be extremely rare to non-existant (for example, the ranch access gates for ranchland in Utah that have no other frontage on I80 or the gated off fire lanes coming off I 5 in the Siskyous, or the lone dead-end on keystone lake's Diamond Head from US 412, not a major street every mile).  Dancing back and forth between the tags breaks consistency when the nature of the road doesn't change enough to warrant a change in classification just for one block.  It's a surface expressway, not that lone block of an otherwise residential road on Southwest Birchwood between 87th and Laurelwood in Beaverton.

If it's high speed and two out of three, then it's a trunk.