piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-12-05 21:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Stereo (2018-10-15 15:49:37+00:00): Congratulations on your first edit! Hopefully we'll meet at the event at the Hackerspace on the 25th?
kartonage (2018-10-15 15:45:41+00:00): Hallo timucini und willkommen bei OSM! 
//
Was immer du hier getestet hast ist schief gelaufen. Wenn dann so Gebäude gelöscht werden und durch Fehler verschwinden, ist das nicht so toll. Ich habe die Sachen deswegen in den Ursprungszustand zurückgesetzt.
//
Wenn du Lust hast dich noch mehr in OSM einzubinden, kann ich dir folgendes Tutorial (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/file:Osm-tutorial.pdf) ans Herz legen. Ein Blick ins Wiki schadet auch nie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) und hilft einem schnell auf die Sprünge bestimmte Dinge richtig einzutragen.
//
Falls du Fragen hast, gern nachhaken. Ansonsten happy mapping!
clay_c (2018-10-23 20:39:40+00:00): The building outline looks a bit too big here too. Could you match it up with the building's exterior walls? Also, did you mean to delete the New Life International Church?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63542654
dcharvey (2018-10-15 18:03:09+00:00): I the aerial imagery I used for this was Bing
Axelos (2018-10-28 08:56:56+00:00): Bonjour,

La clef bicycle:parking (ou bicycle_parking depuis la correction) n'est pas destinée à indiquer le nombre de place.
Mais imaginons que ce soir le cas : alors il est de fait indiqué qu'il y a un total de 290 places pour vélos, puisque cette valeur s’additionne avec celle déjà présente sur le nœud dédié à proximité : https://osm.org/node/3604814431

Il faut donc sacrifier une de ces deux informations qui font doublons.

Cordialement.
GrandNancy_G-Ny (2018-10-29 09:50:17+00:00): Bonjour Axelos,
J'ai voulu faire comme avec capacity_chraging et dans mon élan j'ai confondu avec motorcycle:parking.
Donc il faudra que je corrige.
Cela dit, ça pose la même question avec charging_station, alors que dans ce cas, indiquer le nombre de bornes dans ameniry=parking semble toléré (et prévu).
Axelos (2018-10-29 11:05:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement il est possible d'indiquer le nombre de bornes directement sur amenity=parking.
Cependant il faut faire le choix entre de la représentation généraliste, et le micromapping.

Pour comparaison, si je décide de créer un way pour représenter un trottoir, alors je dois modifier le way de la chaussée principale pour éviter l’existence native du même trottoir en doublon.

Cordialement.
clay_c (2018-10-23 21:17:00+00:00): Tagging looks good and complete! Make sure you square the corners of your building outlines. You can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543019
Jakka (2018-10-16 06:30:56+00:00): Vind persoonlijk overbodig tweemaal de zelfde naam te gebruiken éénmaal op huis en dan nog eens op boerenerf ? Best ééntje schrappen....
pio2_122 (2018-10-15 13:54:21+00:00): Mógłbyś poprawić?
amenity=police
name=Komenda Powiatowa PSP w Myśliborzu
Yunkers (2018-10-15 19:29:37+00:00): A co dokładnie jest nie tak? Dla mnie wygląda okej, ale mogę na coś nie zwracać uwagi.
pio2_122 (2018-10-16 15:12:41+00:00): To jest Komenda Powiatowa Państwowej Straży Pożarnej w Myśliborzu a tag jest dla policji :D
Yunkers (2018-10-16 19:29:18+00:00): Aaa, dobra. Chciałem ujednolicić tag, a wyszło gorzej niż wcześniej. Dzięki za info :)
clay_c (2018-10-24 23:53:42+00:00): Building outline looks good. What kind of building is it? A grocery store?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543489
clay_c (2018-10-24 23:40:55+00:00): Tagging looks good and complete! Make sure to square the corners of building outlines (you can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543497
clay_c (2018-10-24 02:20:49+00:00): Hi! The building outline looks mostly good. Make sure to square its corners (you can find this by right-clicking on the building in Edit mode). The tags should be put directly on the building outline, rather than a point inside it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543554
clay_c (2018-10-24 01:44:55+00:00): The tagging and building outline look good! Make sure the tags are on the whole outline of the building, rather than a single point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543690
clay_c (2018-10-24 02:32:18+00:00): These buildings don't seem to be perfect rectangles according to the satellite imagery. Could you add some more detail?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63543724
user_3022894 (2018-12-23 13:02:32+00:00): Hi c3112n,
wenn du einen Weg mit einem Tunnel-Attribut versiehst, wie zum Beispiel hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634222994  -dann brauchst du den Weg darüber nicht als Brücke zu kennzeichnen. Das wäre dann doppelt gemoppelt und ist falsch, auch wenn es hier in der Gegend tatsächlich sehr oft so gemacht ist. Trotzdem muss man sich immer für eines von beidem entscheiden - entweder Brücke oder Tunnel. Falls du Fragen dazu haben solltest, stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
c3112n (2018-12-23 13:36:26+00:00): Alles klar. Das kam daher, dass ich zunächst die Zufahrtsstraße hinzugefügt hatte und einem späteren Änderungssatz erst die Brücke.
Für die darunterliegende Straße wäre stattdessen covered = yes wohl legitim?
user_3022894 (2018-12-23 20:03:34+00:00): Hi c3112n, 
genau. Du kannst covered=yes oder auch ein covered=bridge nehmen. Manche Mapper sehen auch das nicht gerne, aber legitim ist es. Wie gesagt du KANNST es verwenden, MUSST es aber nicht. Ansonsten gut gemacht. Nur: Layer=0 ist vollkommen richtig für Straßen unter Brücken, aber man ist sich einig, dass das nie gesetzt wird (auch nicht bei Straßen unter Brücken), da layer=0 ein sog. default (=Standardannahme) ist. Für Straßen unter Brücken also quasi gar kein Layer.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
pio2_122 (2018-10-15 14:49:02+00:00): Stosujesz trochę błędne tagowanie:
crossing=zebra => Przejście bez świateł, ale z migającą kulą na słupku i charakterystyczne białe pasy na drodze dla pieszych. (bez przycisku)

crossing=uncontrolled
Podstawowe przejście dla pieszych bez żadnej sygnalizacji , tylko znaki drogowe. Na przykład przejście "Zebra ", zwykle określane jako "crosswalk" w USA).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:crossing
szydzio (2018-10-15 15:13:13+00:00): Ja kieruję się tym opisem:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dzebra
pio2_122 (2018-10-15 15:21:07+00:00): Hm, faktycznie. Jest nieścisłość na wiki. Nawet angielskojęzyczna wiki ma dwie inne definicje na jeden tag... (punkt o tagu zebra na stronie Key:crossing a sama strona tagu)
us2ivb (2018-11-17 11:47:52+00:00): Приветствую! Случайно наткнулся на линию без тегов нарисованную вами. Может забыли затегировать или с какого может мультиполигона выскочила? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634224052
theandyseitz (2018-11-18 11:52:09+00:00): привет
ага, отложил  и забыл
это границы сельского поселения
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
MikeN (2018-10-21 18:10:28+00:00): When the Wells Fargo, BB&T, and Publix were converted to Multipolygons, they became invalid Multipolygons with touching outer edges.  I converted them back to buildings because it stopped the MS building analysis.
Omnific (2018-10-15 15:31:52+00:00): Hey, glad to see some buildings going into Kent. One suggestion: use the square corner option in iD to square the corners of the buildings. To do it, just click on the building and selection the button that looks like a square. It'll make the buildings look a lot better.

Let me know if you have any questions.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:32:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:32:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
eggie (2018-10-15 16:09:08+00:00): Hi Leroy,

It has no use to reshape the buildings. They are imported from the Dutch Kadaster. If the shape is wrong please inform the Kadaster.
Greetz,
Eggie
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:32:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
atcomapper (2018-10-16 06:56:28+00:00): Does the badboy then also have a name?
hrmmhahmhm (2018-10-16 08:10:59+00:00): Nope, the badboy does not have a name.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:32:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
hu9o (2018-10-15 19:32:02+00:00): 👍
Cantuck (2018-11-07 19:23:44+00:00): Please note that the Bing imagery is outdated and only reflects an outdated state of the Springfield yard. Please use DigitalGlobe or Esri instead.
DarthYoda714 (2018-11-07 21:32:01+00:00): I've been there irl and the runthrough tracks, which you removed and just made one track are still there I was just there a month ago. Even if Bing is outdated I've seen it.
DarthYoda714 (2018-11-07 21:43:19+00:00): Also, I just checked the two imagery sources you said to use and they have the exact same thing as what I had put (more or less but nothing majorly different)
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:31:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
j numminen (2018-10-15 17:10:24+00:00): Hi! 

The tags bicycle=yes and foot=yes indicate that while every other form of transportation is private, anyone can get through on foot or bike. Just wanted to confirm if this actually is what you meant. 

 Regards, JN
Ville Koivunen (2018-10-16 07:47:28+00:00): Ah, no. The gate actually has a separate pedestrian door, which has locked too. I'll just remove the tags then.
74523978 (2019-03-07 09:38:51+00:00): Exacte tekening op basis van BAG coördinaten (vele uren werk) onnodig met de losse pols tenietgedaan.
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-15 16:19:23+00:00): Dabar gavosi sodai ant sodų. Ar teisingai suprantu, kad šiame pakeitime nupaišytas objektas „SB Dobilas“ yra sodų bendrijos plotas. Likęs plotas iki miško/pievos tiek į Vakarus, tiek į Pietus yra nebe sodų bendrija, o gyvenamieji namai?
FireWizard (2018-10-15 16:24:46+00:00): Dėl likusio ploto dar neišsiaiškinau, ar jis priklauso kokiai nors sodų bendrijai, ar ne. Bet tai nebe SB "Dobilas" dalis, tas pats su SB "Skambutis".
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-15 16:39:05+00:00): Supratau. Ačiū už info. Sutvarkiau Dobilo, Skambučio ir greta esančius plotus. Jei dar reikia kokios pagalbos - galiu padėti. Sėkmės.
user_5173844 (2018-10-15 18:47:55+00:00): I'm afraid this feature has not yet been deployed on the osm website. Fortunately, the code is already in the repository: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/commit/5935bea3692e631dad4cb70dbdc33660105c7d00 and it should be included in a new release which is due on Friday: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3442
clay_c (2018-10-19 19:50:47+00:00): Nice building outline and tagging! This kind of building is tricky to map. Think of it more like rowhouses, where you draw an outline for each individual home and connect them all to their neighbors. Likewise, each business in this strip mall deserves its own building outline. But since the CVS is all we're concerned about here, go ahead and make that one its own building outline and don't worry about the remainder of the building - You can leave that as a generic building=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63546052
PT-53 (2018-10-16 07:38:58+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
sind an dem neuen Radweg Bühl - Bußmannshausen jetzt Verkehrsschilder aufgestellt ? Wenn ja, welche ?
(Verkehrszeichentool: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/)
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-10-21 06:40:46+00:00): Hallo id=2507, 
wäre schön, wenn Du antworten würdest.
Grüße
pyram (2018-10-15 21:29:28+00:00): Sorry, wenn ich das so direkt sage, aber es ist wenig hilfreich, wenn Du (insbesondere als Ortsfremder) die abgebrochenen (und so erfassten) Gebäude löscht solange die noch bei Bing zu sehen sind. Es gibt zu viele Mapper, die so etwas "Fehlendes" wieder eintragen...
clay_c (2018-10-19 19:51:17+00:00): Good outline, good tagging!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63546308
edvac (2020-01-31 07:34:15+00:00): Again: Can you please explain why you are deleting residential areas that stick to the real residential area, and why you substitute them by geometries that go beyond the residential area?
edvac (2020-01-31 07:58:24+00:00): Could you also explain what is that source of data "OCHA localités"? Is that an import of data from a 3rd party?
edvac (2020-01-31 08:00:09+00:00): Why do you move place nodes out of the residential area? For example, the 4 nodes in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251315907
clay_c (2018-10-19 20:03:50+00:00): Good outline and tagging!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63546502
PT-53 (2018-10-16 07:35:59+00:00): Hallo  id=2507,
Du hast entlang des Radweges Bühl - Bußmannshausen an den Anschlüßen (tracks)  der Felder an die K 7517 jeweils foot=yes und bicycle=yes ergänzt z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584408693#map=19/48.21750/9.93565). Warum ?
Gem. den Access-Restrictions gelten foot=yes und bicycle=yes bei track als Standwert und brauchen daher nicht expliziet angegeben zu werden. Ich bin der Meinung, daß man Standwerte auchgar  nicht eintragen sollte.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Fragende Grüße
GinaroZ (2018-10-15 19:13:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Might be worth adding a way tagged as landuse=retail around this retail park?
Noen (2018-10-15 22:23:17+00:00): Hei!
Du har helt rett Hovseterdalen ikke er "Common land".
Taggene bruker britisk-engelsk ord og vi har ikke noe tilsvarende "Common land" i Norge. 
Men jeg ville heller ikke regnet Hovseterdalen som en park - i vært fall ikke i den britiske betydningen av ordet. "recreation_ground" er nok den riktige taggen her, slik Ekebergsletta er tagget.
Ceshiirie (2018-10-16 08:53:17+00:00): Hei, det har du nok rett i! Fikser det.
gormur (2018-10-15 22:58:10+00:00): Hei J :)
Så lenge det er mulig å kjøre eller gå igjennom, er det best å beholde den gjennomgående veien. Det holder med barrier=block på noden.
traffic_calming er det ikke nødvendig å ha på ways, hvis de enkelte humpene er tagget på noder.
Den søndre delen av Granveien har mistet sin highway=* tag? Og hva mener du med direction=both?
gormur (2018-10-15 22:59:11+00:00): Veldig bra kommentert! Da er det lett å forstå hva du tenkte og kan få konstruktiv tilbakemelding.
aceman444 (2018-12-02 10:28:09+00:00): And again, creating new road without preserving all the attributes, damaging bus routes on that road, creating incorrect both-way roads where they are oneway.

Are you so inexperienced or are you intentionally damaging data?
clay_c (2018-10-23 21:12:36+00:00): The outlines for Haven Elementary School looks like it doesn't match the building. I suggest switching your background imagery to Mapbox Satellite (hit B in Edit mode) before you take another shot at the outline. The tagging looks great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548125
sejohnson (2018-11-09 18:07:54+00:00): Hi, the tagging looks really good, but it looks like you've drawn a box around the general location of the building. Please faithfully trace the exterior outline of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548223
clay_c (2018-10-24 21:59:09+00:00): Hi there. Did you mean to delete various suburban houses and downtown buildings? I'm going to assume good faith and revert this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548227
clay_c (2018-10-24 20:52:02+00:00): Good tagging and outlines! Whenever a building you're drawing has a partially-tagged point, you'll want to get rid of the point and make sure that the building outline gets the relevant tags. Don't forget to square the corners of your buildings (you can find this by right-clicking on a building in Edit mode).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548233
clay_c (2018-10-24 20:32:55+00:00): Hi! It looks like you've added a few building outlines, but haven't yet marked them as buildings. Right now, all they are are blank areas - for all OSM knows, Spin City may be a literal city with that outline as its borders. Could you go back and make sure these are all marked as buildings?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548234
clay_c (2018-10-23 21:27:18+00:00): The post office outline looks great! Though I think you accidentally made two building outlines on top of each other for the Kroger. Could you consolidate them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548238
clay_c (2018-10-24 20:25:08+00:00): Good tagging. Though the building outline is what's important here and it should get the tags, rather than a point inside the building. Could you add all the relevant tags to the building outlines and make sure that they follow the building's exterior walls?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63548265
Robert46798 (2018-10-16 11:15:56+00:00): Hi Fabio,

thanks for your contribution. It seems you accidantally deleted all the given information. I assume there is still I building, so I restored the data just without the formerly given name.

If the building has been demolished, please inform me, as there are methods to mark it, without deleting old data.

Greetings,
Robert
R0bst3r (2018-10-15 16:54:19+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
bitte nochmals prüfen, da ist etwas schief gelaufen.
Gruß
PT-53 (2018-10-15 17:19:06+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
was soll schiefgelaufen sein ?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-10-15 17:22:05+00:00): O.K. habe den Fehler gefunden und berichtigt.
Grüße
sejohnson (2018-11-06 19:35:37+00:00): You have some misspellings in your tags. Also, you should faithfully trace the outlines of the school buildings, rather than drawing a box around them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63549092
sejohnson (2018-11-06 19:34:21+00:00): Good tagging, but you should faithfully trace the building outline, rather than draw the property boundaries.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63549189
literan (2018-10-15 19:50:33+00:00): как-то тут много получилось Кружовников и цветочных магазинов...
F-5 System (2018-10-15 19:59:25+00:00): Да, это и кафе и цветочный магазин. Конечно, найдутся любители чистоты базы, которые потребуют указать это одной точкой (интересно, это кафе с функцией продажи цветов или наоборот), но из адекватной логики указал по отдельности. Кому нужно то или другое смогут найти стандартными средствами.
literan (2018-10-15 20:19:45+00:00): но тут в базе два цветочных  магазина
F-5 System (2018-10-15 21:03:58+00:00): Один уже закрылся. 
Обновил сейчас ещё раз всё вокруг.
dcharvey (2018-10-15 18:02:39+00:00): FYI the aerial imagery I used was from Bing
clay_c (2018-10-16 20:25:01+00:00): Good outline! The right angles look nice, and the tags seem complete. Though I should mention that this is actually a private building, and for the purposes of this contest, we're prioritizing publicly-operated buildings, such as government, education and emergency buildings. (Don't worry, you'll still get points for this one!)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63549377
andrewwiseman (2018-10-17 19:53:33+00:00): Hi, you mapped this as a primary_link - that is supposed to be from exit roads from primary roads. I think this is better as an unclassified road. Here is more about highway classifications Hi, it looks like you added a duplicate road here, it already exists, and added it as a motorway when it is probably a residential road. Here is more about highway classifications: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
eggie (2018-10-15 18:44:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Almtesh (2018-10-16 06:27:30+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.
C'est bien une piscine ce que tu as recalé ? C'est tagué comme une étendue d'eau naturelle (comme un étang ou un lac).
Almtesh (2018-10-16 06:33:16+00:00): J'ai corrigé ça sur les deux que j'ai vues à côté (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63564934), si tu veux faire de même, je pense qu'il doit y en avoir d'autres.
Discostu36 (2024-01-01 21:21:47+00:00): Warum hast du an Way 25922767 ein access=no gesetzt?
PT-53 (2018-10-16 07:22:59+00:00): Hallo Vorsitzender,
es kann sein, daß am Gebäude noch Traube steht. Der Name der Gaststätte wurde aber vor Jahren auf Donauduck geändert.
Wurde der Name jetzt von Donauduck auf Traube zurückgeändert ?
Fragende Grüße
Vorsitzender (2018-10-16 18:28:37+00:00): Guten Abend PT-53,
vielen Dank für deine Anmerkung.
Der Name Donauduck konnte sich nicht durchsetzen und das Lokal ist in Riedlingen und Umgebung weiterhin als Traube bekannt.
Freundliche Grüße
PT-53 (2018-10-31 11:12:26+00:00): Hallo Vorsitzender, 
ich war heute in Riedlingen und habe mir das mal angeschaut. Da steht immer noch groß "Donauduck" auf dem Reklameschild. Ich habe deshalb Name wieder auf Donauduck geändert und aber zusätzlich loc_name=Traube ergänzt.
Grüße
Президент Ирака (2018-11-01 01:45:00+00:00): Мне кажется вы неправильно понимаете смысл landuse=allotments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments
wolfbert (2025-04-25 14:13:15+00:00): Hallo, was war denn bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523396022#map=19/48.159813/15.117175&layers=N mit maxspeed:conditional=140 gemeint? Kann das weg?
wolfgang8 (2025-04-25 14:31:13+00:00): Das war ein Überrest der 140er Teststrecke auf der Westautobahn - hab es bereits entfernt.

https://infothek.bmimi.gv.at/aus-fuer-tempo-140-teststrecken-mit-1-maerz/
wolfbert (2025-04-25 14:38:44+00:00): Danke!