piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-11-23 21:20:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mustafakamil (2019-11-26 05:36:45+00:00): هل انت متأكد من وجود محطة وقود هنا ؟؟
streckenkundler (2020-01-17 15:56:26+00:00): Solche Art von Löschungen würde ich in meinem Gebiet als Vandalismus betrachten.

Siehe Beschwerde eines Users im Forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=774666#p774666

streckenkundler
bosseln (2020-01-17 16:15:18+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus,

führ bitte andere Kämpfe und lass uns unsere ehemaligen Bahnstrecken.

MfG
Protoxenus (2020-01-17 20:40:22+00:00): Ich führe hier keine Kämpfe, sondern setze nur das "on the ground" Prinzip durch.
EM311 hat aus nicht nachvollziehbaren Quellen längst vergessene Bahnstrecken kartiert und behauptet das die Quelle "survey" sei. 
Und euch sei mal empfohlen, euch an die Regeln zu halten. Ich weiß nicht, warum sich hier einige das Recht herausnehmen, für ihr Hobby besondere Rechte zu beanspruchen. 
Zitat:
1. Map what's on the ground
2. Don't map historic events and historic features
Protoxenus
streckenkundler (2020-01-17 20:45:28+00:00): Bitte an der Disskussion im Forum beteiligen! Danke.

streckenkundler
Dan_Fi (2019-11-29 11:03:58+00:00): Hallo osmapper111,

laut meinen Infos (Rückmeldung eines Navi-Nutzers) ist die Baustellenumfahrung nicht mehr existent. Kannst Du das bestätigen?
Dann kann die Strasse doch entfernt werden, oder?
Gruß
Daniel
osmapper111 (2019-11-29 17:45:17+00:00): Hallo Dan_Fi,

die Baustellenumfahrung auf der Südseite der St. 2335 existiert nur noch in Fragmenten und kann aktuell nicht mehr befahren werden.
Die Straßenbauarbeiten dauern noch bis Mitte 2020 und es ist nicht völlig ausgeschlossen, dass der Verkehr hier noch mal über ein Teilstück der ehemaligen Baustellenumfahrung geleitet werden muss.
Aus diesem Grund habe ich sie noch nicht komplett gelöscht, sondern nur die Verbindung zur St. 2335 gekappt.

Viele Grüße
osmapper111
muralito (2019-11-24 00:38:12+00:00): Hi kaartense.

This kind of errors should be fixed in another way.

In the canonical form of address, if the way is "Ruta *"  shouldn't  have addr:housenumber but "addr:kilometer" or someting like that.

Futher more, addr:street shoud be the name of the way in the point of access to the property, so it makes no sense that the nodes are so far away from the way, like most of them in this changeset.

Maybe is better to discuss this issues as a larger problem of this import project in the forum or mailing list.

Regards,
M.
kaartense (2019-11-24 12:58:53+00:00): Hi muralito,
Thank you for your comment. 

> In the canonical [...]
Are you meaning that in reality, these addresses have no house number? About the "km * " that is part of addresses, OSM has no standard way of mapping, so we have a proposal for a new tag [1]. And as soon as it'll be approved we'll correct all nonstandard way of mapping them to this new tag. 

[1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Addr:milestone

> Further more [...]
Ideally, they should but what if the nearby road has no name? It's not impossible that these roads have no name and addresses refer to the nearest one that does, that in this case, it is a "carretera".

> Maybe is better [...]
All that helps to make a better import is welcome. And I think this is a good issue to talk about. I live in Rio Grande do Sul (BR) and here we have exactly the same issue.

Thanks!
eggie (2019-11-23 23:29:10+00:00): De construction=residential staat er nog op. Die regel "moet" er eigenlijk nog af. Dat was de specificatie van toen het nog construction was.
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 23:32:07+00:00): Voorwaarts heeft deze bewerking volgens mij gedaan.
eggie (2019-11-23 23:37:18+00:00): Sorry, maar dat was jijzelf. Zie:  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=77469986
Zie het als een tip. Ik vergeet ook wel eens wat.
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 23:38:24+00:00): Ik heb een bericht verstuurd.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 23:40:07+00:00): Ik heb enkel de weg naar residential gezet omdat die op unclassified stond.  Er wonen mensen aan de Laan van Bergama.
eggie (2019-11-23 23:48:20+00:00): Dat is correct... Maar wat is er mis mee om die door de voorgaande mapper  "vergeten" regel even weg te halen?
eggie (2019-11-24 09:38:57+00:00): Wellicht is dit straks toch meer een doorgaande straat en kun je die beter op unclassied laten staan?
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-24 12:09:53+00:00): Het is geen doorgaande weg.
Mensen hebben huizen aan die weg en wonen dus aan de weg. 
Ook vraag ik mij af of het in de toekomst überhaupt de bedoeling is dat hier auto's door mogen rijden of dat het alleen voor fietsers/bezoek/bestemmingsverkeer wordt opengesteld. 
Ik heb familie daar in de buurt wonen dus zal wel eens een kijkje nemen hoe het er mee voor staat.
Het is zeker niet de bedoeling dat het een racebaan wordt. 30 km/h is dus ook de snelheid die daar is toegestaan.
Volgens mij is het de bedoeling dat het iets dergelijks als een fietsstraat wordt waar auto's te gast zijn. Van een doorgaande weg zou je toch ook een bepaalde doorstroming kunnen verwachten.
eggie (2019-11-24 12:43:17+00:00): Oke.. up to the local mapper...
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474719 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
WoodWoseWulf (2019-11-27 03:47:35+00:00): Hi there! It looks like you have this park (at least partially) over houses - are you sure that's correct?
eggie (2019-11-23 22:59:05+00:00): Dag Vinlandish.. name=Playground hoort niet op de kaart van OSM thuis.
De functie is al aan de poi af te leiden.
Graag name= verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Dynamikum (2019-11-25 08:09:07+00:00): Hallo, dir ist ein Fehler unterlaufen. Du hast aus Heßheim einen Teich gemacht.

Gruß D.
user_8090661 (2019-11-25 08:20:22+00:00): Huch. Danke für den Hinweis. Eigentlich sollte das nur die beiden Wasserflächen bei der Minigolfanlage betreffen. Werde ich heute Abend ändern sobald ich am PC bin.
Dynamikum (2019-11-25 09:06:55+00:00): Jo, kann passieren. Die beiden Teiche sind dir auch gelungen.
Ich habe es erledigt und noch anderes, was ich per Luftbild tun konnte, bspw. nur noch ein outerMP Heßheim,  Ackerland Östlich des neuen Kreisverkehrs.

Wähle bei iD-Editor besser NICHT bing als Luftbild aus. 

Übrigens habe ich JOSM Editor benutzt.
Dynamikum (2019-11-26 14:00:47+00:00): http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=5476853
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 05:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474752 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
Glassman (2019-11-24 00:02:39+00:00): Tip: we don't use descriptive names. Instead of naming a path as Gone, just delete it. We trust that if you verified that it is not longer there then it's okay to delete. Can you remove the descriptive names and remove the paths that no longer exist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77470515
Zyante (2019-11-24 19:44:29+00:00): Removed descriptive names and deleted paths that no longer exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77470515
PT-53 (2019-11-24 11:22:02+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
ist das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749079427/history
wirklich nur ein Fußweg oder dürfen da auch Radfahrer fahren?
Steht dort ein entspr. Verkehrszeichen # 239?
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=239
Falls da doch auch Radfahrer fahren dürfen, wäre path die richtige Klassifikation.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Matthias Frank (2019-11-27 22:10:29+00:00): Hallo Peter,
die Gemeinde Untermarchtal sagte mir, dass für diesen Weg keine Einschränkung wie Fußgängerweg oder Fußgänger-/Radweg ausgeschildert ist. Habe das daher jetzt als Highway=Service getaggt. Grüße von Matthias
PT-53 (2019-11-28 11:18:36+00:00): Hallo Matthias, 
können und dürfen da wirklich 2-spurige Fahrzeuge, also auch Autos, entlang fahren?
Ich hätte den Weg anhand des Maxar Premium Luftbildes ja eher als path eingestuft.
Bei diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749079425/history
mit einer Breite von max. 2 m halte ich die Einstufung als service aber für definitiv falsch.
Hast Du die Wege vor Ort besichtigt oder kannst das noch nachholen?
Fragende Grüße
Matthias Frank (2019-12-02 21:16:28+00:00): Hallo Peter, ich habe die schmale Verbindung zwischen den Häusern nun als highway=path getaggt. Der Schotterweg im Süden ist sicher von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen befahrbar, laut Gemeinde ist auch kein Verbot ausgeschildert. Deswegen habe ich jetzt Highway=track und tracktype=grade2 genommen. Ich komme in der nächsten Zeit nicht dazu, mir das vor Ort anzuschauen. Grüße von Matthias
PT-53 (2019-12-03 08:05:36+00:00): i.O.
Danke
DD1GJ (2019-11-24 22:26:33+00:00): Du hast "toll:N2=yes" auch an alle Straßenknoten hinzugefügt. Bei der JOSM-Suche kannst Du Knoten mit -node aus der Fundmenge ausschließen.
legendary86 (2019-11-25 19:21:37+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe es soeben korrigiert.

(B 3, B 33, B 28)
fx99 (2020-05-31 05:26:49+00:00): Dabei haben auch alle Knoten "toll:N2=yes"
erhalten. Dies sollte entfernt werden.
eggie (2019-11-23 23:20:05+00:00): Top!
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2019-11-24 07:42:23+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/10296105, https://www.osm.org/relation/10296108
skquinn (2019-12-11 10:53:25+00:00): Please do not use parentheses in opening_hours, unless you are following the syntax on the wiki at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours>. This type of error confuses JOSM's validator badly enough that it has to be fixed by hand (i.e. cannot be automatically fixed), even if the rest of the tag conforms.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 06:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474796 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
user_5359 (2019-11-24 07:40:22+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/10329463
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-23 23:44:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75634332, 75634392, 76766903.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-23 23:50:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75661762, 75661967, 75662058.
DavidGonzaless (2020-01-28 09:32:49+00:00): The pharamcie is not here ....
user_5359 (2019-11-24 07:38:00+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
https://www.osm.org/relation/10329460, https://www.osm.org/relation/10329461, https://www.osm.org/relation/10329462, https://www.osm.org/relation/10329463
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 09:49:39+00:00): enough time has passed since these edits, and I am sure that our work process will fix everything that we have broken over time. Thanks your mention. 
Thanks viki_travel_weak
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-23 23:58:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 76016649, 76766867.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-11-24 03:02:27+00:00): What is meant by "layer=1;3"?
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 11:11:22+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added a "tourist attraction" Sabanga but it looks like it is there already.  Please don't add duplicates like this.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 11:11:53+00:00): こんにちは、
このチェンジセットでは、「観光名所」サバンガを追加しましたが、すでにそこにあるようです。 このような重複を追加しないでください。
宜しくお願いします、
アンディ
ydgkkang (2019-11-25 03:22:04+00:00): 123
highflyer74 (2019-12-08 18:30:34+00:00): Moin!

Danke für die Namensänderung! Wenn Du mit iD editierst, lass' Dir am besten immer alle Tags eines Objekts anzeigen. Da gibt es nämlich noch ein contact:website=* und die Öffnungszeiten, die angepasst werden müssen.

Ich hab's gerade gemacht. Schönen Abend!
ralley (2019-11-24 06:16:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  I see you tried to correct the vandalism of the school name.  Rather than creating a new node the brst solution was to edit the exisiting node.  I've mreged your fix with the exisiting node so it should all be good now.  Thanks, Rob.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77473071
Kiwi Nomad (2019-11-24 19:09:34+00:00): Thanks for fixing that @ralley I couldn't work out why it kept disappearing when I put the mouse curser over it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77473071
abakus_uploader (2019-11-24 23:31:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
4004 (2019-11-24 21:47:56+00:00): cheers
4004 (2019-11-24 21:47:48+00:00): again
AndersAndersson (2019-11-25 06:29:24+00:00): hasaan22: Reusing 13 year old nodes keep happening to you.
Please explain your method for editing.
hasaan22 (2019-11-25 17:43:31+00:00): I'm  sorry. I really don't know the reason for this.
I don't use a particular method for editing. I removed all the plugins that might have caused this. I will never use a specific plugin for editing.
Thanks  a lot
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-11-26 05:37:00+00:00): Using plugins should be fine. Maybe try deleting and reinstalling JOSM.
hasaan22 (2019-11-27 11:55:06+00:00): Sure, thanks.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-27 14:24:12+00:00): Again with the same "gamification" tag - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/964088/history .
@hasaan22 - what file did you lead into JOSM and where did you get it from?
SomeoneElse (2019-11-27 14:36:39+00:00): Sorry - "what file did you load into JOSM and where did you get it from"
Chetan_Gowda (2019-12-09 12:00:33+00:00): That's so huge displacement of railway line. Thanks for the fix, mate!
ianlopez1115 (2019-11-29 14:27:51+00:00): Hi,

Please ensure that turn lanes and public transport routes are preserved if non-existent splits are to be removed. If you need any assistance, please let me know as soon as you can.
sannkc (2020-01-15 01:17:16+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you recently changed the classification of Lake Shore Drive in Chicago from trunk to motorway.  I realize LSD shares some apparent similarities to motorways (parallel lanes, grade separation, ramps), but I think it's debatable whether these alone are sufficient to tag LSD as a motorway in OSM, based on the reasons I provided in changeset #74228875 (speed limits, lane widths, safety standards, government classification, etc.). Are you disputing those reasons for not classifying LSD as a motorway?  If so, can you provide a more detailed explanation for what you think I have wrong or why they should not be taken into account in this instance?
geow (2019-11-30 18:02:38+00:00): Hi laufkaefer, thanks for adding the new trail alternative. Would you mind adding the gps data you‘ve used to trace the path to the osm database.

Thanks
geow
laufkaefer (2019-11-30 18:23:41+00:00): Sorry, deleted it already. But the data was my own if that matters.
geow (2019-12-01 21:48:09+00:00): Oh too bad, it is usually helpful for better traceability to upload the Gps data, especially if there is no rectified imagery on which the path is recognizable, as in this case. Thanks anyway for sharing...

geow

PS: You might change the name tag to description=*, as we don't use the name key to describe things, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
PT-53 (2019-11-24 09:22:19+00:00): Hallo edvbraun,
Willkommen bei OSM.
Für ein Fahrradgeschäft sollte - neben dem Namen - zumindest auch der Geschäftszweck eingetragen werden: shop=bicycle
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbicycle
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:21:42+00:00): Hallo edvbraun,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-15 10:04:52+00:00): Hallo edvbraun, 
Du hast an diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551786743/history
das Merkmal 
name=Siggis Fahrradshop
eingetragen und später an diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551786745/history
das Merkmal
shop=bicycle
ergänzt. Das paßt so noch nicht zusammen.
Wo ist denn das Fahrradgeschädt untergebracht, in Geb. 4 oder in Geb. 6 oder in beiden Gebäuden?
Fragende Grüße
dreua (2021-12-05 18:45:32+00:00): Hallo hmpfgnrrr,

als Node ohne tags wurde mir dieser in iD als Warnung angezeigt. Am besten in solchen Fällen einfach das "disused:" prefix einsetzen, vielleicht weißt du das zwischenzeitlich auch schon ;) Ich war mal so Frei, dies hier entsprechend zu ändern.
Grüße
aharvey (2019-11-24 08:57:36+00:00): You can also use branch=Milperra to tag the branch.
Also per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date the format yyyy-mm-dd would make this more machine readable.
ConsEbt (2019-11-25 00:32:54+00:00): Hi Andrew, indeed you are right with the date. What was I thinking.

I'm happy to add the branch tag. I'm rather firm on the name though. The name of the 'restaurant' is McDonald's Milperra NSW per McD website https://mcdonalds.com.au/store/milperra-nsw

So my suggestion is
start_date = 2013-11-16
Name = McDonald's Milperra NSW 
branch=Milperra

I could also add
alt_name = McDonald's
aharvey (2019-11-25 02:35:57+00:00): Oh I'm absolutely in favour of including the branch in the name tag. I was just suggesting also adding it via the branch tag. That way data users can dissect the name into the brand and branch.
ConsEbt (2019-11-25 02:56:12+00:00): Done, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77497751
Warin61 (2019-11-24 08:31:07+00:00): Hi,

Please read the OSMwiki...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
DaveF (2019-11-25 00:17:51+00:00): Hi
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/171441196
How do you know this isn't a living street?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/226074641
How do you know this path isn't designated for walking?
This is over a wide area. How do you ascertain your edits?
emvee (2019-11-25 07:42:03+00:00): For https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/171441196 I removed access=yes, cycleway=lane and motor_vehile=yes as they are redundant or not visible on PDOK imagery

The livingstreet change was done earlier.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/226074641 is only improving the tags so to be more correct, cycleway=yes does not make sense so bicycle=yes and foot=designated is not needed
emvee (2019-11-25 07:45:11+00:00): I think these changes improve the quality of the data, but it might not be perfect, please let me know if you do not agree.
DaveF (2019-11-27 17:35:16+00:00): Hi 
What is PDOK imagery?

171441196 
Apologies. I wasn't paying close attention.

226074641
This is the signage
https://snipboard.io/edzaUS.jpg

I agree cycleway=yes is redundant.
Highway shouldn't really have been change previously from cycleway to footway. However footway can still have a valid foot=designated tag. The blue sign in the picture of the path indicates both walking & cycling is designated.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24831846/history
Similarly this cycleway can be bicycle=designated

DaveF
emvee (2019-11-27 21:00:00+00:00): PDOK is the default imagery you can use in JOSM for the Netherlands; it is open source from the Dutch government, see https://pdokviewer.pdok.nl/

Good to see the image of the sign and that is different then for the Netherlands, we do no have such a sign, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden

I see also that the default access rights for NL are different then the UK, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Netherlands versus https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom

For NL, highway=cycleway implies bicycle=designated and highway=footway implies foot=designated so these are redundant tags but for the UK it is different.

A path like this is in Germany mapped as highway=path with foot=designated and bicycle=designated

So I think it is best up to a local person like you to make the decision what to do, I still think me changes improved things but that does not mean the end result is perfect.
Chris Fleming (2019-11-25 16:31:58+00:00): Thanks Alan. This looks great.

I think the warning about crossing a ford will apply to almost all fords.
trigpoint (2019-11-26 12:27:14+00:00): Access=no seems to have been left from the previous bridge, this should be removed as I am sure the ford is not legally closed.

Cheers Phil
Allan JJ (2019-11-26 12:35:50+00:00): Thanks Phil. I see "Allowed access: All" when looking at the editor for the ford node (getting a car across it is going to be hopeless optimistic :-))
trigpoint (2019-11-26 12:43:38+00:00): The way is tagged as a path, which implies that it is too narrow for a car so car routing is not an issue. No router should send a car along a path.
You can however add foot=yes/bicycle=yes/horse=yes.

Cheers Phil
Allan JJ (2019-11-26 12:47:18+00:00): Thanks - done now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=77476469#map=19/56.48103/-4.04241 .
ralley (2019-11-24 16:38:30+00:00): Typo?  Isn't way 749133111 a playground rather than a quarry?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77476487
ralley (2019-11-26 00:07:43+00:00): Changed to playground
Camello_AR (2019-11-27 13:38:47+00:00): ¿Cual es el sentido de llenar de edificios las manzanas (sin ningún tipo de orden), desde el otro lado del mundo, cuando el mapa tiene mucho más detalles que resolver, además de sumar ediciones?
Por favor evité ediciones automáticas y de reconocimiento automático.
Sawan Shariar (2019-11-27 15:27:32+00:00): Muchas gracias por tu preocupación

Thank you so much for your concern.
iandees (2019-11-24 14:08:43+00:00): Please don't add parks to enhance your game unless they exist in real life. Your changes have been reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77476725
iWowik (2020-01-25 12:36:02+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте! Я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, и наносите им адресную информацию

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти.