piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2021-04-29 05:03:07+00:00): Por otra parte, en los textos de sus conjuntos de cambios ha ingresado el texto "cycleways" o "ciclovías", sin embargo esto no da mas detalles a otros usuarios sobre lo que se ha deseado hacer allí, por favor revise en la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios [0], de tal forma que otros usuarios puedan comprender mejor sus cambios.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
MargoKat (2021-04-30 17:04:06+00:00): Hi costasa and welcome you to the OSM community! I noticed some of your recent edits aren’t matching up with the public resource you’ve cited and I reverted the following changesets in order to restore pre-existing data: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805931/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805979/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103804411/

The following ways that were deleted for example are visible in public resources that are used by the larger OSM community. These are seen in Maxar Premium Imagery, Esri World Imagery, and Bing Aerial Imagery among others, which indicates that they likely do exist and should not have been deleted.
way 834953045 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834953045)
way 232538849(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232538849)
way 232545520(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232545520) 

The alignment of the following roads for example do not match with Maxar Premium Imagery, which was cited as a resource in your changesets. I also wasn’t able to find alternative public resources that support these alignment edits. It seems to me that the original modeling of these roads was more accurate. 
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)
way 936539574(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936539574)
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)

The roads listed below don’t appear to fit the OpenStreetMap criteria for links. I recommend checking out this wiki page for highway classifications and links, which may be helpful as you start editing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
way 232541165(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541165)  
way 232494882(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232494882)
way 232541155 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541155)

If you haven’t done so already, I also recommend exploring more of the wiki pages which are great additional resources for general editing guidelines in OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Página_principal). https://learnosm.org/pt/ is also a great resource for learning the basics of how to edit in OSM.  Thanks and let me know if you have questions!

- MargoKat
portalaventura (2021-04-29 02:10:25+00:00): lucasgamon, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Paraná mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmpr.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:54:39+00:00): #TIP: we typically add the address to the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103806120
portalaventura (2021-04-29 03:10:57+00:00): Estação Odontologia, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:02:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One recommendation. Save and upload before working in a distant location.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103807144
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:00:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103807291
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:56:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103807375
Kha_nam (2021-04-30 06:44:25+00:00): Hi Maristel Esguerra
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping the residential  road. Kindly check with way 159911711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103887181
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103807870
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:56:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103808049
iandees (2021-04-29 04:11:52+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for adding to the map. Please don't use all-caps when typing the names of places. Let me know if I can help you map or if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103808064
Kha_nam (2021-04-30 06:08:39+00:00): Hi Bevs Galario
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping the residential  road. Kindly check with way 316800543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103884764
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103808427
Kha_nam (2021-04-30 05:54:10+00:00): Hi Julie Ann J
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons residential road. Kindly check with way 337410437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103883869
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103808599
Kha_nam (2021-04-30 05:44:41+00:00): Hi Dondee Manuel
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road. Kindly check with way 316741710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103883241
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103808741
Kha_nam (2021-04-30 04:35:37+00:00): Hi CORz LEE 
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on unclassified road. Kindly check with way 246643824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103879308
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809038
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:08:32+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809112
flohoff (2021-04-29 16:27:07+00:00): Good Evening,
i doubt this way is a track. Its a road for accessing the Buildings so its a service/drivway i guess.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809323
sabodige (2021-04-30 06:58:40+00:00): Hi flohoff ,
Thanks for checking into our edits and providing the feedback. Based on your suggestions, I have observed the road pavement and the entity it is leading to, a driveway/service will be more appropriate in this scenario which completely aligns with your verdict. I am changing a part of the road into service till the entity. please find the changeset for the modifications and let me know in case of anymore suggestions. always happy to learn from the community.
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-04-29 04:25:49+00:00): missed out this changes: extend CN double track to east of Carvel
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:12:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Only minor suggestion is the road in Zephyr road should be capitalized.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809877
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809877
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:19:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103809894
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:21:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One #TIP: you can merge the existing node for the school with the new building by selecting both objects, right click and use the + to merge the objects.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103810078
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:19:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103810347
user_5359 (2021-05-02 05:15:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8678159189 Did you mean add:housenumer instead of "ard no,"?
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:12:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103810429
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103810429
Polarbear-repair (2021-04-29 08:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted in CS 103825389 where the comment is: Vandalism.
 
OpenStreetMap ist ein Projekt von Freiwilligen, die in ihrer Freizeit Daten zu Straßen und anderem sammeln. Diese Daten werden inzwischen sehr vielfältig für Karten und Navigationszwecke eingesetzt und aufgrund ihrer Aktualität zunehmend auch von Rettungs- und Lieferdiensten genutzt. 
               
OpenStreetMap bildet die aktuelle Realität ab, unabhängig von den Eigentumsverhältnissen. Daher werden wir einen existierenden Weg nicht entfernen. Wenn ein Weg für die Öffentlichkeit gesperrt ist, werden wir ihn entsprechend der Zugangsrechte kennzeichnen, z.B. als privat.
 
Mit Ihrer Löschaktion haben Sie den Rettungs- und Lieferzugang der Hausnummern 4, 6, 7, 15 entfernt, das ist nun wieder hergestellt. 

Die Verbindung des nördlichen und des südlichen Zugangs zu Nr 7 habe ich unterbrochen gelassen, da es sich vermutlich wirklich nur um einen Trampelpfad im entsprechenden Garten handelt.
Polarbear-repair (2021-04-29 08:39:17+00:00): DWG Ticket#2021042910000014
user_5359 (2021-04-29 19:52:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on www.osm.org/way/936565473: What is the meaning of admin_level=1 ? admin_level=2 is reserved for a country so 1 is for a continent ??
Vulcanodong (2021-04-30 14:35:17+00:00): 你这里标注有错误的 边界的admin_level的数值没有用1的 而数值2用于国界 省际边界 则数值更大
Vulcanodong (2021-04-30 14:36:42+00:00): 另外我看到 你标注了 邳州界 (936565473，版本 1) 这个是什么意思呢 跟据山东省标准地图 郯城县和江苏不会 借用沂河的
Vulcanodong (2021-04-30 14:39:49+00:00): 我已将你编辑的路径删除了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936565473 You editing about this way have been deleted.
user_11418917 (2021-04-29 05:54:35+00:00): Do not add spam again. this is not your first or your 2nd. you posted lots of spam. if you post again I had to report you and you will be blocked.
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:09:07+00:00): Does the park have a name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103811607
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:04:51+00:00): I think PSE is a private business not a government agency.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103811690
user_5359 (2021-04-29 16:44:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5154045334 over 100 meters, please check the position.
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:13:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103812636
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103812636
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:12:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103813591
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103813591
flohoff (2021-04-29 16:22:50+00:00): Hier ebenso. Ich sehe im Luftbild jede menge Wohngebäude/Höfe. Das können keine Tracks sein.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103813747
flohoff (2021-04-29 16:26:07+00:00): Als Hint - ich habe hier einen Debug Layer - Der hat jetzt deine änderungen noch nicht mit drin. Aber der zeigt wo die Adressen sind und wo der nächstgelegene Punkt auf Routingfähigen Straßen zu dem du geführt würdest. 
Tracks sind nicht im Routing drin. D.h. Adressen/Häuser/Höfe die nur an Tracks liegen sind routingtechnisch nicht erreichbar - Was auch vollkommen richtig ist.

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=addresses-nrw&layer=routeable#51.70408,8.86262,14z

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103813747
MikeN (2021-04-29 12:17:22+00:00): Hi, Why was the new Popeyes restaurant and the driveways around it removed?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571503782/history    Why was the new building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907190790/history removed?
boopington (2021-04-29 21:52:09+00:00): the Popeyes is new? how can that be when its shape and driveways are on the older imagery?
MikeN (2021-04-30 00:56:07+00:00): Yes, the new Popeyes was built in the same location as the old building that was torn down.  The old building was a reasonable approximation for the new building until new imagery is available.  Someone had already added the new driveways for the new configuration which don't match the old driveways.   Mapillary - new: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=34.776000402528275&lng=-82.30878573552894&z=17&pKey=0n5efscjoYSAahP82UuiPC&focus=photo&x=0.7093908239480355&y=0.6098956962635605&zoom=1.195219123505976   Old: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=34.77600950426481&lng=-82.30879636724463&z=17&pKey=FpfZn2o1Fl79FIHNsxeTbh&focus=photo&x=0.6721109452384936&y=0.5310385056099296&zoom=0.7865956405545973
itsamap! (2021-04-30 13:07:23+00:00): It's there
https://www.popeyes.com/store-locator/store/restaurant_239841
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:07:11+00:00): I think just adjusting the river bank would have been better. The name is nice but probably not verifiable which makes it unsuitable for OSM. Can you please fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103814056
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:13:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103814171
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103814171
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:16:09+00:00): #TIP: The boat launch road is most likely a highway=service. Unclassified is a classification used in England which is basically a residential road in rural areas. (OSM got its start so we use their road classification and spellings) Also where the road connects to the water, add a tag leisure=slipway to indicate the boat launch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103814787
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103815257
flohoff (2021-04-29 16:21:52+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier den Windmühlenweg zu einem Track gemacht. Das ist er aber bestimmt nicht. Denn er dient als Hauszufahrt zum Hof Henke. Das kann also kein Track sein.

Ein Track ist für Ausschließlich oder Überwiegenden Land oder Forstwirtschaftlichen Verkher. Das ist hier ja wenn da Wohngebäude sehen definitiv nicht so. Da fährt der Postbote und die Paketdienste Häufiger als ein Trecker.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103815671
rene78 (2021-05-01 22:44:35+00:00): I think you are looking for demolished:highway=residential
corinag_grab (2021-05-04 05:58:07+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:22:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103816054
ChrisPRS (2021-04-29 07:56:41+00:00): I hope it works now properly in Strava as I checked earlier and it is still coursing me via Le grand avenue instead of lawton.
ianlopez1115 (2021-04-29 12:31:08+00:00): rthik007 & ChrisPRS, I made changes in changeset 103844882 which may or may not fix the routing issue. Please make further edits if this changeset didn't resolve the routing issue.
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-29 16:28:59+00:00): It will take some time until it becomes routable on Strava. They only update their map every 2-3 months.
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:17:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103816133
user_5359 (2021-04-29 16:42:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1168563: There are no tags on the relation. Can you please check this?
x58 (2021-08-22 22:39:49+00:00): @pppetros, This church existed already as a building. Why did you add a duplicate church node? You have made the same error with countless churches all over Greece! What was the rationale behind this? Am I missing something here?
Mikel Ortega (2021-04-29 07:39:51+00:00): Reverted in changeset #103823448
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-04-29 06:33:45+00:00): Correction: should have mentioned Highway 779
Violaine_Do (2021-04-29 18:02:12+00:00): Iaorana e Maeva e Mauruuru pour la contribution! C'est super de partager ces informations. Dans OSM il ya des conventions sur le nommage, à propos des majuscules minuscules. Du coup au lieu de mettre les noms tout en majuscules il est conseillé de mettre des majuscules juste sur les noms qui les prennent. Du coup par exemple pour la rue FARE VA'A, je mettrais Rue Fare Va'a. Je te laisse faire les modifs?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103818226
Violaine_Do (2021-04-29 18:03:03+00:00): Le lien qui explique ceci: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Respectez_les_conventions_d.27.C3.A9criture_pour_l.27attribut_name
Dawid2849 (2021-04-29 08:23:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310791051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629278275
Czy te łącznice dalej powinny być jako primary_link?
impiaaa (2021-05-13 16:32:30+00:00): This change includes a number of duplicate addresses (including unit number, and without feature tags). Is there a way to clean that up or should they be left?
Minh Nguyen (2021-05-13 21:50:32+00:00): This was based on the SCCProperty2 layer tagged on this changeset. Normally when I encounter a building with individual units in that layer, I add points for each of the units and then tag some of them with the information from the SDP dataset. That way we aren’t left with a false sense of having completed the per-unit mapping of the building.

In this case, it does look pretty messy. I wonder if the layer incorporated a combination of different data sources, none of which accurately positioned the units within the building. Since the data is suspect, we can remove it in favor of a proper survey.
impiaaa (2022-06-09 01:07:36+00:00): In changeset 122140017 I imported the addresses here from City of San Jose data, merging and replacing the old points.
Minh Nguyen (2022-06-09 03:22:54+00:00): Thanks!
Dino Michelini (2021-10-29 13:57:03+00:00): footway non è corretto, si tratta di un path
olo81 (2021-05-23 23:02:55+00:00): skąd źródło tej edycji?
Według Państwowego Rejestru Nazw Geograficznych jest to Las Zagórski.
olo81 (2021-05-23 23:22:13+00:00): https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=5695094
maraf24 (2021-05-24 07:39:19+00:00): Dwa są? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11048315
stimoroll (2021-05-24 08:19:59+00:00): Nie ma dwóch. Jest Las Zagórski i to jest właśnie to miejsce na granicy Zagórza i Kazimierza Górniczego.
maraf24 (2021-05-24 08:30:14+00:00): Czyli Las Zagórski to jest to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7610690
stimoroll (2021-05-24 08:32:26+00:00): Tak dokładnie. I nie powinny być połączone relacją - bo nie są połączone w żaden sposób.
maraf24 (2021-05-24 08:54:12+00:00): Nic z tego nie rozumiem.
Co nie jest połączone?
Dlaczego obszar, który ma się nazywać Las Zagórski ma teraz nazwę Lasek Zagórski?
maraf24 (2021-05-24 09:11:53+00:00): Ok, nieważne, już wiem o co chodziło.
To połączenie sam zrobiłeś w tym zestawie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89471559
Co widać tutaj: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=11048315
Widzę też, że już jest poprawione.
eggie (2021-04-29 08:03:01+00:00): Dag Brothers.. 
 name:en heb ik verwijderd. Dat is niet nodig.
name=.. zal renderen als naam.

Meestal rendert iets niet op de standaardkaart als andere objecten in de buurt liggen. Het staat wel in de data. Ik heb wat geschoven met de andere adresnodes. Wellicht zal het zo renderen. Even de tijd geven.
Paar keer ctrl-F5 doet wonderen.
Cache leegmaken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-29 08:14:36+00:00): Op zoom 30m zie je nu de naam.. Het zal wel komen door de straatnaam op het fietspad.
Dat bijt elkaar. 
 Iets aangepast..  Maar weer even kijken wat er gebeurt.  :)
eggie (2021-04-29 17:54:52+00:00): Bij inzoomen rendert het nu