piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2016-03-08 22:48:37+00:00): I've fixed the coastline around Bathurst. Please note that it should never overlap or cross itself. Also please note that polygons (including the wetlands you have done) should never selfcross either). I've fixed a few issues here, but there appears to be a huge number, which I do not have any more time for.
Arietigue (2016-03-09 14:51:15+00:00): Thanks for your help. I'll try to fix these errors.
Hjart (2016-03-09 19:34:37+00:00): Thank you. As soon as http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=130.31895&lat=-11.58269&zoom=11 is updated with current data those issues will show up there. Good luck
VA00 (2017-08-17 15:43:50+00:00): Szlak chyba oznakowany jednokierunkowo
Martin Borsje (2016-03-10 19:28:16+00:00): Beste Chris,

Je zegt een camping toegevoegd te hebben, maar er zijn nu een aantal campings over elkaar heen getekend: Park De Nieuwe Riet, 40+ Camping de Nieuwe Riet en 40+ Park de Nieuwe Riet.

Dat is toch niet de bedoeling?

Wil je dit herstellen? Kom je er niet uit, laat dat dan hier even weten.

Succes
Chris Visser-Koghee (2016-03-11 09:40:20+00:00): Beste Martin,

Volgens mij is het nu in orde.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-05-29 11:18:45+00:00): You have added lots of houses on this stretch of the road with the addr:housenumber=Shinrone. Is that correct? addr:housename is the tag to use if the house has a name, not a number. Do all this houses have the same name??
pyram (2016-03-25 14:55:47+00:00): Die Hausnummer sollte nicht Teil des Gebäudenamens sein. Wenn man die unbedingt sehen soll dann trage sie doch am Eingang mit entrance=main ein ;-)
wambacher (2016-03-09 11:32:29+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37705806
SomeoneElse (2016-03-09 18:36:16+00:00): Hi EzekielT,
People have contacted you several times in the past about invalid admin level changes (including me, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33275714 ).
Whereas most things in OpenStreetMap are simply a matter of going and surveying something and then adding the results to OSM, with admin levels it's all too easy to make countries and parts of countries "disappear" and cause other people lots of work just because you make a silly change.  There's a forum at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53173 in which admin levels are discussed.  Please do not make any changes to admin levels without discussing it in the relevant country forum or mailing list, and in the "Internationale Admingrenzen 2016" forum.
If you continue to make changes like this without discussion first you will be blocked from editing OpenStreetMap in the future.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Geography Canada (2016-03-14 00:17:25+00:00): I have many sources: http://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/news/regional/10/09/netherlands-antilles-no-more/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituent_country, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aruba, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint Maarten, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curacao (although you did say we can't use Wikipedia as a source).
SomeoneElse (2016-03-14 00:37:22+00:00): One of the articles you quote says "Aruba is one of the four constituent countries that form the Kingdom of the Netherlands".  http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2323309 is the admin level 2 relation; Curaçao http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1216719 is a subarea of that.
As I've said above, if you think something is wrong you need to discuss it - please don't just dive in and change something that you don't understand.  Many (most?) of your edits so far have had to be reverted.  I'd suggest that instead of changing international admin levels you instead go out and map the shops in your local high street, or the things in your local park.
Geography Canada (2016-03-14 15:28:41+00:00): That's a good idea. Okay.
tbakhuis (2017-12-04 19:17:17+00:00): Curacao is not NL as the Nominitem geocoder suggests.

Currently a lot of addresses are displayed in OSM as Street, Willemstad, 0000AA, NL. This is not correct. Here in Curacao we don't have zip codes and the NL should be changed to CW. Since 10-10 2010 Curaçao is an autonomous Country that is part of the Netherlands. Before this, the Country used to be NA (Netherlands Antilles) but never NL. PLease change this for the whole island so the geocoder addresses show up properly
SomeoneElse (2017-12-04 19:25:52+00:00): Thanks - I've added a comment over at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675663#p675663 (which is the forum where admin levels etc. are discussed).  However, I'm not actually sure whether you're describing a problem with the data in OSM or with the Nominatim geocoder (Curaçao is "an autonomous country", but also "part of the Netherlands").
tbakhuis (2017-12-04 19:53:38+00:00): It does sound strange when you see it like that but we never put NL (Netherlands) as country. I live in Curacao it just doesn't look right when we see Curacao, NL. Google's Geocoder has it right this time. Google Geocoder has Street, Willemstad, Curaçao
wambacher (2017-12-05 08:49:08+00:00): please read this answer at the forum: 

#######################

Just for clarification:

There is a 'Kingdom of the Netherlands' (plural intended) - or 'Koninkrijk der Nederlanden' (idem).
Within this kingdom there are 4 autonomous countries:
- the Netherlands (again, plural intended in English), but 'Nederland' (no plural) in Dutch - and note: without 'kingdom' here;
- Curacao;
- Aruba;
- St. Maarten.
Each of these 4 above have full authority over everything apart from defense and representation at the UN - these 2 are done by the Netherlands / Nederland for all 4.
The latter 3 are former parts of the Netherlands Antilles, an administrative unit that no longer exists.
The other parts of the former Netherlands Antilles, the islands of Bonaire, Saba and St. Eustatius, are 'special administrative units', sort of special counties, within the Netherlands / Nederland.

The issue mentioned above is that Curacao is treated with postal codes from the Netherlands / Nederland, which is indeed incorrect.

So there is a 'Kingdom of the Netherlands' (covering 4 countries) and a 'the Netherlands' (being one country within aforementioned kingdom).

I hope this clarifies rather than confuses ;-)

Marcel
(I spend some 3 days on a conference about 8, 9 years ago explaining this to an ISO commission who dealt with this sort of geo-chaos, including UK crown colonies, FR special overseas departments, special autonomous regions ... etc.). I know first-hand it's hard.
#######################
link to forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675685#p675685
Geography Canada (2017-12-05 16:44:54+00:00): That's what I knew all this time, but I guess all of you still didn't listen :).
wambacher (2017-12-06 10:52:25+00:00): Hi EzekielT. no easy stuff ;)
see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675929#p675929
Geography Canada (2017-12-06 20:52:13+00:00): Maybe we should tag all of them (Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Netherlands, Aruba, Sint Maarten, and Curaçao) as admin_level=2, as they're all officially countries!
Geography Canada (2017-12-06 20:58:34+00:00): As in:

Kingdom of the Netherlands (including the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten) -> admin_level=2

Netherlands -> admin_level=2

Curaçao -> admin_level=2.

Aruba -> admin_level=2.

Sint Maarten -> admin_level=2.
tbakhuis (2017-12-07 03:15:43+00:00): Seems correct to me. Indeed they're are all countries
mavl (2019-03-14 16:21:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:21:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-03-09 13:07:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
OSM is a geographical database to reflect what already exists, it is not intended to make requests for changes to the road system.
I have reverted this change.

I suspect adding a roundabout here would be a bad idea as it would make right turns from Sturdee Road easier hence turning it into a rat run.
Supaplex (2018-09-29 09:46:09+00:00): There is a problem of the English name of Sowchow University, it should use the name the university claimed, not the one outsider called them.
Nakaner (2016-03-10 22:16:40+00:00): Bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien beachten.

Um eine Liste von Ortsverbänden in einem bestimmten Gebiet zu erhalten, kannst du Abfragen an die Overpass-API via Overpass-Turbo oder direkt per curl/wget/… stellen. Zum Abbilden von Ontologien und Hierarchien in Organisationen ist OSM nicht der richtige Ort. Das einzige, was geht, ist dass du den einzelnen Ortsverbänden ein network="THW-Landesverband Berlin, Brandenburg, Sachsen-Anhalt" zuweist und dies in deine Overpass-Abfrage aufnimmst.

Beim Formulieren der Abfrage bin ich dir gerne behilflich.
deierstoiner (2016-03-10 23:13:15+00:00): Ich habe mich an die Vorlage gehalten:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency_service%3Dtechnical
Nakaner (2016-03-11 09:30:16+00:00): Entschuldigung. Dann kann ich dir leider keinen Vorwurf machen.

Die Relationen sind zwar trotzdem nicht besser, aber wenigstens ist es nicht deine Schuld.
awesm (2016-03-10 03:52:41+00:00): What is this change? Changeset comment please!
Glassman (2016-03-09 06:19:04+00:00): Are the fields actually named Dale's Field and Pooter's Field? Names should normally be added when there is a physical sign or is well known locally. If it's just a friends name, please remove it.
user_5359 (2016-03-13 19:12:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
GerdP (2016-03-14 08:49:40+00:00): Hi there!
You have changed a few roads from highway=unclassified to highway=minor.
This tag should no longer be used, why do you think that highway=unclassified is not good ?
See e.g. here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173995846
Polarbear (2016-04-28 17:25:54+00:00): Hi, you were changing roads from highway=unclassified to =minor. The latter is deprecated, please don't.

Some roads are fixed now.
lusdavo (2018-01-24 18:54:31+00:00): Thanks!
SK53 (2016-04-01 11:49:12+00:00): The English name of Tierra del Fuego is Tierra del Fuego: there is no translation like "Fire Ireland" in any regular usage.
jptolosa (2016-04-01 12:15:50+00:00): I didn't add the tag name:en of Tierra del Fuego, but thanks for notice it.
Totor (2016-03-09 04:58:35+00:00): Hi Drivestation,
Is that preschool part of the electric sub-station ?
Warin61 (2019-03-08 23:59:20+00:00): Hi,
Is this cycleway construction open by now? 
Way: 402570220
samuelrussell (2019-03-11 09:30:49+00:00): Last time I was through here was within the last month, and not to my recollection (as I was forced through the industrial park to Parramatta road.  But that may have been signage or routing, as I wasn't looking for this way's status.
rene78 (2016-03-09 20:54:31+00:00): hi webby, just a little hint: satellite images are sometimes misaligned. a often better way to trace are gps traces. strava donate theirs to osm. example: http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK&map=17.06/101.63964/3.15454
manings (2016-03-10 10:10:36+00:00): Hi Aksheyta,

You have created duplicated buildings here. Please fix them?
R0bst3r (2016-03-09 13:17:27+00:00): Hi, you've added a lot of "oprator:type" keys. See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eSu

Can you correct them to "operator:type"?
Polyglot (2016-03-09 14:10:27+00:00): Hi Rob, in fact those tags had been added in a previous changeset, but I corrected them, of course. Thanks for noticing.

Jo
martinum4 (2017-08-25 08:36:19+00:00): Hallo, nur ein paar kurze Hinweise für die Zukunft:
1) Ein DGH taggt man meist als amenity=community_centre
2) Den eigentlichen Ortsteil gibt man via addr:suburb=* an, den direkt in die City reinzuschreiben ist nicht so elegant
.
Für Eiterhagen hab ich es jetzt mal angepasst.

Schöne Grüße

Martin
Totor (2016-03-10 05:04:45+00:00): Hi drivestation,
great edits!
A little tip:
If you have problems making squares or rectangles following bing, in iD you can select the area and then press S to make them square automatically.
Only for areas that are also square in Bing of course...

Other useful shortcuts:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts
dvdhoven (2016-03-09 15:01:28+00:00): Weg 27085945 is ten onrechte doorverbonden, nu kan fkp route 63-83 niet meer afslaan.
Knoop 288379221 bevat nog wel het lidmaatschap van het netwerk Veluwe, maar de tag rcn_ref=83 is weg
Knoop 4049843198 heeft de tag rcn_ref=83, maar is geen lid van het netwerk Veluwe
Ik heb alle routes hersteld, 1 node knooppunt 83 gemaakt en de weg weer door geknipt.
Commodoortje (2016-03-10 00:08:20+00:00): excuus, dit was zeker niet de bedoeling.
Er liep een dubbel stuk highway op de positie waar nu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402689701 ligt.
Ik was van mening dat ik het juist had gecorrigeerd.

Dank je voor je hulp.
literan (2016-03-09 12:56:36+00:00): highway=residential - это именованные улицы в жилых зонах. Таких дорог не может быть безымянных, не может быть в промзонах. Для служебных проездов применяется тег highway=service. Вы сами поправите то, что сделали, или в противном случае как мне быть с вашими правками (в основном они неверны)?
literan (2016-03-09 13:04:55+00:00): Впрочем, все уже поправил. В дальнейшем очень прошу правильно ставить статусы, чтобы не пришлось откатывать ваши правки.
zarl (2016-06-22 11:59:08+00:00): Hi Haves,

ein POI reicht vollkommen für einen Container-Standplatz, und die Abfallart ist kein Name, sieh dir doch bitte mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling an.
Hjart (2016-03-09 20:56:44+00:00): Det forekommer mig helt usandsynligt at du har lavet det her manuelt.
Winbladh (2016-03-09 21:43:14+00:00): Det tegnet på baggrund af GST luftfoto.  Det er langsomligt. Jeg kan ikke forstå din undren, fair nok at man er bange for import,  men jeg synes det er træls at få i nakken,  når man bruger timer på at tegne i osm. 
Markdata er mig bekendt ikke i noget offentligt datasæt, derfor undre jeg mig igen at jeg klantres for import af data. 
Synes det var smartest at få lagt al GST data ind i osm, så man ikke behøvede at bruge tid på noget der allerede er lavet og tilgængeligt (som dog ikke er muligt pga. Copyright fnidder).
Hjart (2016-03-10 10:14:33+00:00): Ok. Jeg har aldrig kigget direkte i GSTs datasæt, så derfor er jeg ikke klar over hvad der er eller ikke er i dem, bortset fra hvad jeg har kunnet se dig og nogle få andre importere til OSM.
Du har foretaget et stort antal importer, heriblandt en del, som efter min mening var stærkt kritisable. Havde det været i dag med min nuværende erfaring var de  blevet reverteret lige på stedet. På grund af disse importer og din erfaringsmæssigt manglende lydhørhed overfor modargumenter hører du til dem jeg holder særligt øje med og er særligt mistænksom overfor.
Jeg kan godt se at det kan virke fristende at importere allerede eksisterende landuse data. Men efter at have arbejdet meget med de ting, som først og fremmest du har importeret, er jeg kommet dertil at jeg mener der ikke bør importeres mere overhovedet, copyright "fnidder" eller ej. Geodatastyrelsen og OSM er to meget forskellige størrelser og hvad der er passende i det ene system er ikke nødvendigvis passende i det andet.
Hjart (2016-03-10 10:17:27+00:00): Desuden når jeg ser på hvad du laver her, føler jeg stærk trang til at lave det om. Jeg er ikke imponeret af det.
aceman444 (2016-06-05 16:17:26+00:00): Hi, why is St.Peter's cathedral no longer a place of worship? Why have you removed the tags?
asdf1234 (2016-06-05 16:32:48+00:00): I agree that it _should_ be a place of worship.  I changed "church" to "church building".  Not sure why that would remove "place of worship".
aceman444 (2016-06-05 16:44:49+00:00): Maybe, it is the iD editor's automatic work. It may be that it distinguishes the building itself from the place of worship aspect if you have explicitly chosen so. I have fixed the tags now.
asdf1234 (2016-06-07 02:52:57+00:00): I think you are right.  Thanks.
literan (2016-03-09 12:48:32+00:00): Здесь то же самое: с чего вдруг tertiary??
literan (2016-03-09 12:51:11+00:00): здесь то же самое.
Allroads (2016-03-09 22:46:53+00:00): layer=-1 bij tunnel=culvert, bij eerdere melding stond ook -1
RijkPloeg (2016-03-10 09:39:02+00:00): Intussen gestart met wijzigen.
literan (2016-03-09 12:47:16+00:00): Добрый день. Дворовый проезд ни при каких обстоятельствах не может быть tertiary. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402608745 Правильные теги для дворовых проездов: highway=service
living_street=yes. Здесь исправлю.
waldhans (2016-03-10 07:03:07+00:00): EDEKA hat die falsche Adresse auf Ihrem Eröffnungsprospekt angegeben. Mittlerweile haben sie das korrigiert auf "Westgraben 5-7".
Das war also mein Fehler, aber jetzt kommen ja die amtlichen Nummern...
mfg Kurt
stoni100 (2016-03-10 07:33:34+00:00): Viersen hat nach der Auswertung 3 Hausnummern in OSM mehr - eine davon wird jetzt vermutlich offiziell vergeben, eine dem Eigentümer (ARGE Viersen) verweigert wegen Unsinnn.

Hier beim Edeka handelt es sich jetzt um die offiziellen Adressen, Edeka wird von der Stadt angeschrieben - mal sehen, wie das weitergeht.

Grüße
Michael
pacman541 (2016-03-11 09:55:00+00:00): Зачем рисовать то, чего нет?
pacman541 (2016-03-11 09:53:49+00:00): Здесь нет проезда
pacman541 (2016-03-11 09:52:21+00:00): Откуда инфа что здесь проезд?
На бинге ничего такого нет.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-03-10 18:42:12+00:00): please follow the format from osm-wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
do not forget value="en:Name"
FvGordon (2016-03-12 14:14:09+00:00): area:highway is not closed (like way 402618917), around same way.
uryevich (2016-03-10 06:53:29+00:00): Дмитрий (Максим?), а зачем вы дороги сквозь здание навтыкали? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402619957#map=18/55.87450/37.62542&layers=N
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-08 07:17:24+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4050056852 Bist du sicher, dass man hier alte Fenstergläser abgeben kann oder meintest du recycling:glass_bottles=yes? Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling#Materialien
lucadelu (2021-05-10 11:06:14+00:00): Anche queste ciclabili, se sono sentieri da mtb è bene usare questo tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale e non cycleway
waldhans (2016-03-10 06:37:13+00:00): Netter Versuch, aber in dem Fall liegt OSM falsch. Diese Firmen schreiben sich offiziell mit Großbuchstaben. Also soviel auch alle Prüfprogramme meckern, der Eintrag im Handelsregister gilt. Ich habe das nochmals geprüft, etwa 10% der Firmennamen sind in Großbuchstaben.
Bei den von mir eingetragen Namen schau bitte zumindest in das Impressum der jeweiligen Web-Seite.

Das Gleiche gilt für Abkürzungen. Falls der Name so im Handelsregister stehe, ist er richtig. Dann soll OSM ruhig meckern...

mfg Kurt
stoni100 (2016-03-10 07:30:19+00:00): Bistro Proseven schreibt sich auf der eigenen Homepage auch nicht in Großbuchstaben, oder besser gesagt, man kann auf der Homepage genau das finden, was man sucht - ich wollte eigentlich mehr die Tools testen..... 
Über welche Methode bekommst du solche Änderungen mit ?
Chetan_Gowda (2016-03-15 09:11:52+00:00): Hi @00crashtest,

 Seems like you're changing major roads tags. I have observed that you've made change to US 101 from highway=primary to trunk which is incorrect. I have reverted your 2 changesets : 37704797, 37704671. 

Feel free to post your comment on this changeset.

Chetan
Aurimas Fišeras (2016-03-26 09:43:54+00:00): Hi, combination "waterway=ditch and layer=-1" is incorrect – layer is not needed. Layer is only needed for culverts.

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/lt/errors/?source=6641&item=4110&class=41107
DaveF (2016-03-09 14:55:29+00:00): Which app was failing to interpret OSM data correctly?
notgary (2016-03-09 20:28:52+00:00): runkeeper.com

It's a fitness app that allows you to draw routes for your run on a map powered by OSM. If pedestrian traffic isn't allowed, it won't allow you to draw a route down that road.
DaveF (2016-03-09 20:40:19+00:00): Could you contact the app's creators please & let them know that trunk roads are assumed accessible by foot.

Do you know why it's only a few disjointed sections?
BCNorwich (2016-03-09 12:21:50+00:00): Hello There, unfortunately you have inadvertently made two of the buildings in that block into circles. It would be best to revert the changes you made and start again. If you wish I can revert your changes for you and you can add agian your business. Or if you can tell me the position of your business I can add it for you. If I interpret correctly all blocks in that building where allocated, has a business ceased to operate? If so which one?

Regards
Bernard
BCNorwich (2016-03-10 07:11:45+00:00): I have removed the circles, but may I remark that your name is on two of the buildings.
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-25 17:17:52+00:00): Warum hast du diesen Bürgersteig https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402633332 extra eingezeichnet? Ist doch gar nicht nötig, da er baulich nicht von der Straße getrennt ist? Und warum nur diesen Abschnitt? So etwas bringt doch nichts und macht nur unnötig Arbeit.
dachefte (2017-03-31 09:21:33+00:00): Die Frage ist: Was ist bauliche Trennung. Ich behaupte: Ein separater Parkstreifen _neben_ der Fahrbahn, dazu mit Baumreihe unterbrochen, stellt eine bauliche Trennung dar: Es ist eben _nicht_ mehr möglich, jederzeit mit jeder zugelassenen Fortbewegungsart vom Gehweg auf die Fahrbahn zu wechseln. Weiter gerne per PM.
Piskvor (2016-07-08 10:20:37+00:00): Dobrý den, to řeznictví v Maiselově 15 se mi nějak nezdá: chodím kolem a nikdy jsem si ho nevšiml. Opravdu tam je, nebo tam pouze má sídlo firma?
Francois555 (2016-07-20 09:39:55+00:00): Dobrý den, jo jo, máte pravdu, bylo tam jen sídlo firmy. Přesunul jsem to do Dlouhé 39. Díky
Piskvor (2016-07-20 09:42:38+00:00): Super, díky moc.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-14 16:22:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
czubi (2016-03-23 18:25:18+00:00): den Poller musst Du in die Straße setzen und dem Poller die nötigen Attribute mitgeben.
Welcher Teil der Straße ist für Autos gesperrt?
mokart1 (2016-03-23 22:45:35+00:00): Habe ich ihn nicht in die Straße gesetzt? Welche Attribute? "Welcher Teil" verstehe ich nicht. Der Poller hindert Autos daran, auf der Straße weiter als bis zum Poller zu fahren ... Der Pollar steht in Verlängerung der westlichen Hauskante von Nr. 12.
czubi (2016-03-24 12:58:24+00:00): Der Poller steht immer noch neben der Straße !
Mit dem Attribut access=* bestimmst Du welche Zugangsbeschränkungen für Autos, Radfahrer, Fußgänger bestehen   (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access) Wenn auf Grund des Pollers Straßenabschnitte auch nicht oder nur eingeschränkt befahren werden können/dürfen muss du dies auch mittels access=* dem highway mitgeben.
Dein Poller steht mittig auf (neben) der Rathenaustraße. Wenn Du da ein Poller hinsetzt ist wahrscheinlich (das rate ich jetzt mal) der gesamte Straßenbereich vom Schlagbaum Justizzentrum bis zum Poller einschließlich den Parkplätzen access=privat. Und hier mal lesen
mokart1 (2016-03-25 21:54:41+00:00): Genau, vom Schlagbaum bis zum Poller "private". Ich hoffe, jetzt hab ich's richtig gemacht.
czubi (2016-03-26 15:24:34+00:00): Der Poller ist jetzt auf der Straße das ist ok.
Er hat aber immer noch keine Attribute (access). Was ist mit dem Rest der Rathenaustraße und den beiden Parkplätzen? (öffentlich oder privat?
czubi (2016-03-26 15:25:43+00:00): Der Teil Rathenaustraße AUF dem Parkplatz hat bestimmt keinen Namen, das wäre sehr ungewöhnlich