piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maxerickson (2016-12-29 16:14:27+00:00): Hi-

I've removed the lake here that clearly doesn't exist. As you are editing please keep in mind that your changes immediately get added to a global dataset with many users.

I've also adjusted an area that you had marked as industrial to be marked as a hospital. It's pretty long, but the map features wiki page is a good introduction to the sorts of things that are commonly mapped in OSM:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

Feel free to reply here or send me an OSM message (click "Send Message" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/maxerickson ) if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Max
keithonearth (2016-12-17 00:07:21+00:00): Once again I forgot to update the source field in JOSM. The imagery used was *BC Mosaic* not Bing. I pretty much always use BC Mosaic for the area it covers, only occasional comparing it with Bing, as the Bing imagery seems to be more up to date.
FTA (2016-12-21 00:52:23+00:00): Hi, can you provide some more information about the source for marking this as a military installation? I couldn't resolve any indications on the compatible satellite imagery through iD (Bing, MapBox) that this may be.
MapMakinMeyers (2016-12-21 03:44:22+00:00): Yes, thanks for the message. After tracing it in Bing, I did look at several other digital globe images (WV02, WV03) and there are military ships in the area, and military installations. Unfortunately Bing and mapbox don't have quality imagery to see this (*the DG imagery I was looking at was from 11/16 and 12/16).
DavidKewley (2016-12-17 07:19:47+00:00): Hi rsavoye, it looks like this changeset added the Winter Park ski area fine. But then the next few changesets each did two things: 1) add a new ski area boundary, and 2) delete the ski area added in the preceding changeset. I think after this series of edits, only the final ski area still is visible. I'm guessing you had some editing workflow issue here. Take a look and see if you got the result you intended. Also, it looks like the only tag you added to each boundary was its name, no tag saying what kind of object it is, (e.g. landuse=winter_sports, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps). Without a landuse=* or similar, it probably won't get rendered, although I'm not sure whether or how landuse=winter_sports gets rendered by various renderers. Hope this helps! -David
rsavoye (2016-12-17 15:57:17+00:00): I hadn't tried to upload a polygon before, I'll add the additional tags, as soon as I can figure out how to edit the existing changeset.
Colebrookdale Railfan (2016-12-17 02:19:58+00:00): Please ignore the incorrect info above. What it should say is that I have added the wye and redefined some abandoned sidings near the old CNJ roundhouse in Allentown yard. I also added the Allentown hump tower.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
mueschel (2016-12-23 21:00:12+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe hier das Tag "footway:track =track" gefunden, das sonst nirgends verwendet wird. Was genau bedeutet es?

Gruß, Jan
Ottonormalverbraucher (2016-12-24 07:28:38+00:00): Hallo Jan, es bedeutet, dass ich mich verschrieben habe. Es sollte links oder rechts heißen. Die Sache ist die, dass ich mich in Thüringen dazu habe hinreißen lassen, außerhalb meines eigentlichen Vorhabens Verkehrszeichen anzubringen, weitere Bearbeitungen durchzuführen, die zu Diskussionen Anlass gaben. Ich halte mich deshalb bei Bearbeitungen außerhalb von Verkehrszeichen zuück. Aber du kannst gerne eine Bearbeitung durchführen. Gruß Ottonormalverbraucher.
Ottonormalverbraucher (2016-12-25 11:50:04+00:00): genannte Eintragung mittels http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44660105 zurückgesetzt
mavl (2016-12-19 03:38:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:38:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:38:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:38:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:38:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:37:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2016-12-19 03:37:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mbethke (2016-12-17 08:23:28+00:00): Hi Brian,
thanks for your OSM additions! Just a note: it's important to add a "name" tag, not just name:en or name:lo, otherwise the POI won't have a name on the rendered map. This is usually just a copy of one of the language-specific tags, either the English or the Lao version here.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:29:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:29:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Carnildo (2016-12-17 10:30:10+00:00): Err, no.

Anyone driving Dike Bypass and expecting a trunk road will be very surprised to find themselves on a narrow two-lane road with assorted driveways coming off it.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
dgitto (2016-12-17 07:20:23+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OSM.
Daniele
mueschel (2016-12-20 12:02:52+00:00): Hi,
this and three other objects have many strange tags. Did you really want to add them to the OSM database or was it a mistake?

Jan


AREA_HA=185.61
BESLMYND=Länsstyrelse
BESLSTATUS=Gällande
DIARIENR=5112-02706-2009
FORVALTARE=Länsstyrelsen i Örebro län
GEOSTATUS=Slutligt inmätt
IUCNKAT=Ia, Strikt naturreservat (Strict Nature Reserve)
KOMMUN=Askersund, Hallsberg
LAGRUM=Miljöbalken
LAN=Örebro Län
LAND_HA=60.31
NVRID=2005676
SENGALLDAT=2015-10-29
SKOG_HA=55.147
SKYDDSTYP=Naturreservat
URSBESLDAT=2014-10-30
URSGALLDAT=2015-10-29
VATTEN_HA=125.15
Erik Hagelberg (2016-12-20 15:38:16+00:00): Hi there Jan!

It was a mistake during import. Did a quick overpass-turbo query and notices similar mistakes done on previous imports. Thanks fot the heads up. All is now corrected. Best wishes Erik H.
XimeX (2021-03-05 10:23:04+00:00): Du hast start_date auf 1889 gesetzt für die Rosalienkapelle. Stimmt das? Im aktuellen Bezirks Blatt steht 1888.
fkv (2021-03-05 11:12:01+00:00): Ich weiß nicht mehr, von wo ich die Jahreszahl herhabe. Vielleicht von irgendeiner Webseite übernommen. Vielleicht habe ich mir verlesen oder vertippt. Auf meinen Fotos (von vor meiner OSM-Zeit) sehe ich nur die Jahreszahl 1846, das muss der Sockel vom anderen Kreuz sein. Somit hab ich nichts dagegen, dass du 1889 auf 1888 änderst. Es kann auch sein, dass die Bauzeit von 1888 bis 1889 dauerte, oder dass der Bildstock 1888 gebaut und 1889 eingeweiht wurde oder so.
XimeX (2021-03-05 11:35:31+00:00): Die 1846 steht auch im Bezirksblatt für das Kreuz. Das sollte also stimmen. Das Problem ist ich traue dem Bezirksblatt auch nicht 100% weil da schon oft Fehler drinnen waren. Was meinst du: soll ich "1888-1889" eintragen?
fkv (2021-03-05 11:51:43+00:00): Ist so ein range überhaupt zulässig in start_date? Grundsätzlich finde ich, dass man entweder die eine oder die andere Jahreszahl nehmen sollte. Ich nehme meistens jene, ab wann das Objekt fertig oder zumindest teilwese "betriebsbereit" war, nicht das Datum des Spatenstichs. Ich habe hier mittlerweile den Eindruck, dass 1888 stimmt, aber wissen tu ich es nicht.
XimeX (2021-03-05 12:13:58+00:00): Hab nochmal nachgeschaut. Die richtige Syntax ist mit ".." also "1888..1889". (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:start_date)
Ich nehm auch immer betriebsbereit oder offizielles start/einweihungs Datum und nicht Baubeginn. Steht aber auch so im Wiki das nicht der Baubeginn gemeint ist.
Soll ich "1888..1889" und "fixme=exact start_date" oder so setzen?
fkv (2021-03-05 13:09:58+00:00): Im Wiki steht das mit den 2 Punkten zwar drin, aber diskutiert wurde das nie und verwendet praktisch auch nicht. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass das irgendwer auswertet. Jetzt mal abgesehen davon, dass start_date generell keiner auswertet. ;-) Ich schätze, dein fixme wird nie wer beheben können, weil das exakte Startdatum keiner weiß. Aber mach halt, was du für richtig hältst.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:33:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
AndersAndersson (2016-12-17 18:31:49+00:00): Hej!
Både leisure=natural_reserve  och speciellt landuse=forest borde tas bort från denna relationen. leisure=natural_reserve finns ju i underliggande vägar och relationer.
Detta blir galet då t.ex. denna sträcka får leisure och landuse taggar från den här relationen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207079486.
Hela Malingsbo-Kloten är inte heller en skog. Det finns ju t.ex. sjöar där.
Erik Hagelberg (2016-12-17 19:10:28+00:00): Hej! Oj. Nej. Har jag råkat taggat hela relationen Örebro?! Det ser nästan så ut. Det har absolut inte varit medvetet isåfall. Är väl medveten om att inte allt är skog :) Hade lite strul med att JOSM hängde. Undrar vad jag hade markerat.... Hittar du något dumt så ändra det gärna. Eller så gör jag det. Om jag förståt felet rätt. Mvh Erik.
AndersAndersson (2016-12-17 23:04:01+00:00): Ok :)
Jag tog bort det från örebro-relationen.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Gumeg (2017-05-12 09:00:20+00:00): Добрый день. Имя name стоило вешать не на линию забора https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354584992, а на мультиполигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5296443 Я сейчас сам поправлю. 
Вы не знаете сохранился ли забор вокруг территории Эколога?
vylekzhanin (2017-05-12 16:24:39+00:00): Всё рекультивировано, включая верхний почвенный слой. Забора нет, даже на Я.Панорамах.;)
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2016-12-17 10:07:51+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed your edit, and I've fixed up the node you added. I'm pretty sure your shop isn't a a fast food joint! :) So I removed that. :)

If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
trigpoint (2016-12-17 10:52:45+00:00): Hi, is there really a church here. The area is mapped as a school and imagery suggests that the mapping was correct.
Trebor51 (2016-12-22 16:49:23+00:00): If you look at Google Streetview you will see the church is to the right of the school. Look art this link: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5399819,-0.4513927,3a,75y,100.04h,86.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sksT2GeGoJbq0ZCS22eFjEA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
BTW I used to worship at that church and my children went to the school.
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:35:44+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:30:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 21:58:09+00:00): You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark and select "menu" and then "bookmark".
Cascafico (2016-12-19 10:40:09+00:00): Non credo sia corretto marcare tutta l'area ospedaliera come pronto soccorso... da quel che ne so c'è un reparto pediatrico malattie infettive e punto nascite
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:36:10+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:47+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-06-05 16:30:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-01-19 15:18:00+00:00): Hello, Daniel Osei Agyeman.
You have written that your source of the data is Aeriel google map. The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data.

More information:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Did you really use the data of Google? Maybe, did you use "Bing Satellite Imagery" или other Satellite Imageries?
aceman444 (2021-04-26 00:29:06+00:00): Zdravim, naozaj bar v lese (a v OSM tam dokonca mame pole) ?
utack (2016-12-18 20:38:25+00:00): Hi,

do you know about all the ramps?
Are they accessible now too?
Some are still access=no:
https://i.imgur.com/2dBMkx5.png
https://i.imgur.com/1CsVLGG.png
https://i.imgur.com/f4Ec1OT.png

Best
Jakob
Piskvor (2016-12-18 20:58:26+00:00): #1 and #3 is correct OTG: #1 are road-service-only on-ramps, and #3 is closed for unrelated reasons (traffic complaints from locals, I believe). #1 should 
be access=private actually, good point (yet somewhat academic, nothing should 
route over that in either case, and rendering ought to be similar). Will recheck #2
next time I'm around: there were, at one point, two different sets of ramps, with only one open at any given time. Not sure which one was chosen as the permanent one, but I think it was the one currently marked as accessible.

Cheers,
Piskvor
utack (2016-12-18 21:01:57+00:00): Allright thanks!
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:31:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-19 15:17:55+00:00): Hello, Daniel Osei Agyeman.
You have written that your source of the data is Aeriel google map. The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data.

More information:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Did you really use the data of Google? Maybe, did you use "Bing Satellite Imagery" или other Satellite Imageries?
lakedistrict (2017-03-05 18:02:16+00:00): Hi Dan,
Is there a reason why you changed East Street to highway=living_street? I'm not too familiar with that tag myself. I thought that highway=pedestrian would be more correct, since there are "Pedestrian Zone" signs at each end. Certain vehicles can still drive on highway=pedestrian streets and these are detailed within the tags. 
Thanks :-)
mavl (2017-01-19 15:17:47+00:00): Hello, Daniel Osei Agyeman.
You have written that your source of the data is Aeriel google map. The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data.

More information:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Did you really use the data of Google? Maybe, did you use "Bing Satellite Imagery" или other Satellite Imageries?
sq7obj (2016-12-22 20:32:09+00:00): Hej, czy jesteś pewien że droga dla rowerów wzdłuż ulicy Węglowej została już wybudowana? Kilka dni temu była jeszcze w budowie.
mavl (2017-01-08 15:28:46+00:00): Hello, Daniel Osei Agyeman.
You have written that your source of the data is Aeriel google map. The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data.  
  
More information:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F  
  
Did you really use the data of Google? Maybe, did you use "Bing Satellite Imagery" или other Satellite Imageries?
Hjart (2016-12-17 22:02:40+00:00): Bemærk at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava heatmaps (som der er masser af her) kan være en stor hjælp ved kortlægning af stisystemer.
Hjart (2016-12-17 22:04:38+00:00): Jeg er iøvrigt imponeret over at du så hurtigt kaster dig over JOSM. Det er der ikke mange begyndere der gør.
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:30:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pawelkowalski (2016-12-17 20:31:06+00:00): Ale to, że usuwasz sobie informacje o tym, że jest tu trawiasty pas startowy to już jest żenujące. Wróć go proszę spowrotem.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-18 07:23:17+00:00): Hi Beeers,
last day you put "" = "" x2 ! please be carefull while editing.
Thanks, Alex
5m4u9 (2016-12-18 07:32:48+00:00): revertido porque estos son datos privados
Владимир К (2017-03-21 14:24:38+00:00): названия или описания зданий точно не должны быть в ref
Junglist (2017-03-21 14:36:48+00:00): Верно. Сменил на description.
5m4u9 (2016-12-18 07:32:54+00:00): revertido porque estos son datos privados
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:31:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:31:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
literan (2016-12-18 13:25:59+00:00): why vandaling? Lock gates on the Moscow street? Reverting
yurasi (2016-12-19 15:23:09+00:00): Hi OpenBrian
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you splitted one building into 16 stores, but this isn't visible on satellite imagery. I think that you should revert your change to alone one building.
OpenBrian (2016-12-19 17:42:07+00:00): Thanks for checking this.... My "source" is incorrect.  I live in this area and I did a street survey.
OpenBrian (2016-12-19 18:10:51+00:00): @yurasi Are you using "to-fix" to catch issues like this one?
yurasi (2016-12-20 14:53:21+00:00): I use OSMCHA (https://github.com/willemarcel/osmcha) for this type of detections. If you add the tags, it will wonderful. Also I recommend insert the correct source :)
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 21:54:58+00:00): As requested, I've deleted this.
Fuorisella Bob (2016-12-27 19:42:35+00:00): Ciao Marco, questa modifica alla mappa è godibile per noi biker?

Ciao,
Bob
MKnight (2017-01-02 18:14:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4558632382 stimmt etwas mit den Öffnungsyeiten nicht, wie sind diese richtig?
MKnight (2017-11-10 13:19:00+00:00): wurde zwischenzeitlich behoben