piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber (2020-07-06 10:38:42+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
eggie (2020-07-05 20:00:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip: Let wel op dat je geen vlakken aan gebouwen vastmaakt.
Je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87564517
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-05 20:05:03+00:00): BWI  Begin nooit met access=no  Dat is een Verbod voor iedereen.
Je ziet ook aan de rendering dat er iets niet klopt.
access=no verwijderen svp. 
bicycle en foot= yes ok verwijderen.
Staat er een bord ruiters toegestaan. Ruiters mogen niet op fietspaden komen.

Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87564680
MVG,
eggie
balint36 (2020-07-06 23:32:57+00:00): Szia! Ezzel a módosítással a 4432282-es számú mezőgazdasági terület egyik külső határvonala elcsúszott, és emiatt a terület már nem zárt.
eggie (2020-07-05 20:08:50+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten met alles dat er eraan vast zit.

Gebouwen niet nogmaal het adres geven. Er zal al een adresnode zijn.
Editor iD wil je van alles laten invullen.. Dat hoeft niet. Dus op reguliere wegen hoef je niet te taggen dat ze niet overdekt zijn.
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87565188

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-05 20:11:31+00:00): In principe taggen we instanties niet op de gebouwen maar op de adresnodes. Niet elke vermelding zul je zien op de standaardkaart. Er zijn ook afgeleide kaarten. 
De brandweerkazerne is correct getagd.
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
TravGW (2020-07-05 20:02:23+00:00): I don't think San Antonio counts as #txsmalltowns
Andrew Matheny (2020-07-05 20:08:13+00:00): Aye, this is a tag I created to track edits I do around Texas that started with small towns
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
eggie (2020-07-05 21:02:14+00:00): Top!  Heb nog even sidewalk=left aan het fietspad toegevoegd
Gr eggie
FrankOverman (2020-09-21 19:37:59+00:00): way/780052184 is ook gereed, gister overheen gereden, Noord naar Zuid
A67-A67 (2020-09-22 15:27:06+00:00): Bedankt!
Het staat ook al in de BGT, dus ik heb het zeer precies in kunnen tekenen.
Parzelle13 (2020-07-07 15:37:37+00:00): Bitte beim nächsten mal alle Routen die über die alte Kreuzung führten im Kreisverkehr korrigiern. Danke
dd8kq (2020-07-07 18:42:16+00:00): Sorry, ich wollte es ja machen aber ich wusste zum verrecken nicht, wie es geht. Beim letzten Kreisverkehr in Lendersdorf hatte ich es gekonnt, nur jetzt nicht mehr. Deswegen das fixme
stick2 (2020-07-05 21:22:24+00:00): That looks more like the plot of land than the building, from the aerial view
Stereo (2020-07-09 11:15:54+00:00): What an interesting article, thank you!
Tomas Straupis (2020-07-06 06:18:10+00:00): Ar tikrai visas šitas kelias:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69118668
yra asfaltuotas? Ir ar tikrai visoje šioje atkarpoje yra 50kmh greičio apribojimas?
DurDomas (2020-07-06 07:12:37+00:00): Asfaltavimo darbai pradėti pavasari, o dabar jau nuiminėjami ribojantys ženklai.

Didelė dalis kelio yra 50km/h, bet pritariu pastabai ir nuimu greitį, nes jis visame kelyje yra skirtingas.
Tomas Straupis (2020-07-06 09:01:44+00:00): Ačiū už info. Patikslinau ir klasifikaciją (asfaltuotas keturių skaitmenų -> secondary).
Jordi MF (2020-07-08 18:33:58+00:00): He creado el paso de peatones que está a continuación de la calle peatonal. Es más fácil que veas cómo lo he hecho que explicarlo...
Saludos.
SomeoneElse (2020-07-05 21:55:33+00:00): Hello again,
As mentioned by several people previously (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8517545 ), in this changeset you've again added the council's reference for the right of way here to both the "name" and the "ref" of this track. This isn't the normal way to do it - the public right of way reference goes in the "prow_ref" field.
Best Regards,
Andy
Redingensian (2020-07-05 22:09:56+00:00): Hi Andy and thank you for the comment, appreciated. I see I've had a number of similar comments which, for whatever reason, have not provoked an alert. I'll use prow_ref. Best wishes, Jeremy.
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-07 07:20:19+00:00): Ciao,
Benvenuto nella community di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovate tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

Ciao e ancora benvenuto in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
Osmwithspace (2022-07-07 21:13:59+00:00): What exactly is this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1025488405
greenie11 (2022-07-08 10:23:41+00:00): Not sure, but considering the location I think it's a playground device. Can't fully confirm through.
Zatigem (2020-07-06 09:07:19+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for your contributions! Please, try to upload your changes only in a small area. And if you want to modify 2 different regions, publish them separatly. It makes it easier for inhabitants to check your modifications.
Thank you :)
user_5359 (2020-07-06 04:36:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add religion and denormination (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion) to the church.
laurent-38 (2020-09-30 09:47:33+00:00): Bonjour Rando67,

J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté des chemins pour délimiter des surfaces en bout d’impasse :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823262281 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823262280

L’usage de highway=residential + area=yes n’est pas dans les normes habituelles d’OSM, Le seul usage codifié de highway=* + area=yes est celui des zones piétonnes (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:area).

En alternative, je ne pense pas que place=square convienne ( zone trop petite et ne portant pas de nom spécifique). Peut-être que highway=turning_circle à l’extrémité de l’impasse conviendrait mieux ? (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle)

Cordialement
~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2020-10-26 14:59:40+00:00): En l’absence de réponse, modification effectuée dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93067398
~~
laurent
Myazyk (2020-10-11 19:47:56+00:00): Такі межі населених пунктів - це якийсь піпєц
1gorok (2020-10-13 12:37:51+00:00): Ну, які визначені кадастром, такі й є. Це гірська місцевість, лісосмуги тощо. Тому й такі кордони населених пунктів. Чим далі від гір, тим кордони населених пунктів "пряміші". Просто треба прийняти цей факт.
DaveF (2021-11-06 16:14:47+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448479862#map=19/51.43367/-1.05339

Do you know the prow_ref for this section?
gscholz (2020-08-02 10:24:08+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.61820&lat=-25.29738&zoom=14&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Nakaner (2020-07-06 08:06:21+00:00): Hi,

where exactly did you take this information from Wikipedia? Could you please provide an URL to it?

Thank you.

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87568675
gendy54 (2020-07-06 08:44:19+00:00): Hi,

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_de_d%C3%A9fense_et_de_s%C3%A9curit%C3%A9

I could have even done it without Wikipedia because I already have the local knowledge...

Donat, alias gendy54
Spanholz (2020-07-09 21:12:06+00:00): Thanks for mapping WV!
AgusQui (2020-07-17 03:45:21+00:00): ¿Porqué?
El Tag ref se usa si el poste tiene un número específico, diferente a la distancia. En la wiki está bien aclarado, y la foto es un buen ejemplo.
Poner el valor distances en ref no tiene ningún sentido.
Zalitoar (2020-07-31 02:24:25+00:00): Hace un tiempo lo conversé con el resto de la comunidad en Telegram. Comenté que esto hace posible la búsqueda en Nominatim por kilometraje y no recuerdo que hubiera objeción alguna. Vale decir que a mí tampoco me convence eso, un poste está afuera de la vía, es un objeto independiente. En todo caso el nodo sobre la vía debería indicar solamente la distancia y no ser un "poste".
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:23+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
WaupunKnight (2020-07-06 01:38:15+00:00): First edit, played around with the settings, accidentally mislabeled the name of the edit.
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
Frans S (2020-07-07 14:58:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Your mappings are below the mapping quality standards. The mappings of this changeset will be reverted and all buildings needs to be mapped accurately and squared.
For Future mappings:
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:04:51+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
Frans S (2020-07-06 12:31:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
!! your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM. your mappings are rather sloppy.
I reverted most of your mappings because it cost more time to correct these than mapping them all over again.
Please square in future mappings  all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work. you ignored 13 warnings

Best regards
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:05:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
TZLNCTV (2020-07-06 02:34:55+00:00): Quick Note: iD alerted to an edit conflict that occurred (never had that pop up before) - it looks like it might have messed up some parts of the WV 92 relation. Looking into this.
TZLNCTV (2020-07-06 02:39:17+00:00): Any problems with the relation should be fixed now.
Frans S (2020-07-06 12:46:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
You clustered a number of buildings and called 1 building. These mappings have been removed and needs to be mapped individually.

Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
jan_ardy (2020-07-07 00:43:19+00:00): Thank you for your notification.

I knew that rectangular function, and usually use it. but in this case, many structures seems to added and added. therefor many structures are not rectangular that I thought.
 
anyway, I check it again in several aerial photos later.
I'm gonna try to improve my skill.

best regard.
Glassman (2020-07-06 18:39:47+00:00): I'm not sure I understand teh opening_hours  of 24/7. It kind of implies that the gate is open 24/7. Is that true? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87572266
MerlinPendragon (2020-07-06 17:11:44+00:00): Hello!

Looking through the article you've linked, it looks like the Livingston Park that was renamed was one in Albany, NY, not this one in Columbus, OH.
Carnildo (2020-07-06 07:05:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset 87582017
Frans S (2020-07-06 14:45:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
A number of your mapping are rather sloppy. I reverted those. Please remap them more accuratly *task 459)
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-06 15:28:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.
btw, You run on an outdated JOSM version, Now 16538 (windows) is actual.

Best regards
Kovoschiz (2020-07-06 06:13:07+00:00): Thanks but `opening_date=` is not `start_date=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87573952
ScottNelson (2023-01-20 07:19:25+00:00): Hi I am attempting to add nordic skiing tags (piste:type=nordic, etc). So the Marsh Lake XC trails show up in ski oriented OSM apps.  The trails you added here seem a little inconsistent with the published trail map and with the Stava heatmap data, so I'm not quite sure what to do.  I will tag the consistent trails for now, but not change any of the existing data until I get some more information.
Ben&Sarah (2023-01-20 21:50:57+00:00): Hi Scott, 
yes I think this is fine - I had added what I could based on my own GPX tracks from running the routes in summer, and skiing the Marsh Lake loppet.  At the time there was no published ski map I don't think.
ScottNelson (2023-01-21 06:29:28+00:00): Do you know if the trails are consistently groomed?  Classic or Skate?  And what the difficulty rating would be?
Ben&Sarah (2023-01-23 21:41:01+00:00): Hi Scott, I think these are only occasionally tracked as classic. I would probably personally rate most of them as green or blue. I am not sure if they have been formally graded by anyone.
BrackoNe (2020-12-20 12:57:29+00:00): Hello JJIglesias,

I wanted to inform you that I'm removing the "place" tag from the riverbank.

Thanks,
Nemanja
JJIglesias (2020-12-20 20:49:10+00:00): Thanks, should not have been a tag in a riverbank. So my mistake if it was.
BsRgds
BrackoNe (2020-12-20 20:50:24+00:00): Thanks for the confirmation. It is already fixed.

Thanks,
Nemanja
Zatigem (2020-07-06 08:51:18+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for your contributions! Please, try to upload your changes only in a small area. And if you want to modify 2 different regions, publish them separatly. It makes it easier for inhabitants to check your modifications.
Thank you :)
IanVG (2020-07-06 12:22:15+00:00): HI Zatiranyk! Thanks for the comment. I didn't even realize I made a change (I think it was near Potsdam) and I'm very sorry about that. I do remember briefly going over to see other countries' practices of mapping sidewalk when that happened. Is there any way I can edit my changeset name or other info after the fact so I can include that information? Thanks!
Zatigem (2020-07-06 17:51:38+00:00): Sorry, I don't think editing a changeset, neither the description, is possible. So you think the changes next to Berlin was a mistake? Seems you just moved a house number. You can still revert any changes even from others' changesets using JOSM in expert mode! I can do it for you if you want :)
Zatigem (2020-07-06 17:58:21+00:00): Every people can revert any changeset. Reverting is just another changeset, so it's not really "modify" it directly.
Zatigem (2020-07-10 09:38:58+00:00): I reverted the node next to Berlin.
DENelson83 (2020-07-07 06:22:55+00:00): Thanks for adding a few extra details that I missed on my recent visit to Lund.
Glassman (2020-07-06 18:45:04+00:00): Sorry but I removed the cycleway. It is already tagged as part of 9th avenue north. The tag is cycleway:right=track. We tag cycleways as attributes of the street when they aren't physically removed from the road. Like the Burke Gilman. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway for more information. I'll send you some generic info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87577367
Subzidion (2020-07-06 23:47:34+00:00): I saw the 2nd Avenue Cycle Track is present. Why does that one get included?
Glassman (2020-07-07 00:46:33+00:00): Good question. According to the wiki, A bicycle lane or class II facility is an inherent part of the road itself. It has no physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road. Notably, there is no curb between the cycle lane and the road. If there is a space and possibly plastic marker posts, but no physical separation, this may be called a buffered bike lane. The one on 2nd ave should most likely be an attribute of the street. 

I'd suggest posting the question on Slack. There is a dedicated bicycle channel as well as a Washington State channel. Either could get you more information and help. FYI - at least one of the developers of a cycle map is active on Slack.
TravGW (2020-07-08 11:32:05+00:00): These are trunk links not unclassified ways. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
Lipscani (2020-07-08 23:20:01+00:00): Hi TravGW, thanks for notifying me and making the change.
user_5359 (2020-07-06 12:59:10+00:00): I disagree with your statement: in one case there is no definition of open_date and in another case a time in the future is a logical open_date for the key start_date
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:17:36+00:00): 一般來說，是改善既有的標示，像是將畫成區塊建築的渟亭，加上 amenity=shelter，就會既讓程式知道這是涼亭，也能讓看 osm.org 網址的地圖畫面，看到涼亭的標示
Supaplex (2020-07-09 04:47:12+00:00): There is someone complain about the road name change. Make sure that you add the correct one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87581810
Supaplex (2020-07-09 05:11:36+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87740433
#DWG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87581810
KlausFerdinand94 (2020-07-06 07:17:25+00:00): test only
emvee (2020-09-03 07:48:36+00:00): Hi Juan,

In this changeset you also removed bicycle=yes from several footways. That triggers some warnings as cycleroutes are going over these footways, see for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308649151 the section "Part of", the same Relations as you see mentioned in this changeset.

You are likely known in the area, I am not but If cyclists should go over the road, these route relation should be changed.

I think I see on Mapillary a bicycle sign, see for instance https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=SLmRqv9VS50G1zC9IxuPmA&signs=true&points=true&lat=51.933587081115434&lng=8.914875664774968&z=17&x=0.491818053854161&y=0.48846369575654813&zoom=0 so I wonder if it is correct to remove "bicycle=no"

Greetings,

Martin.
JuanCarlos80 (2020-09-03 09:46:29+00:00): Hi Martin,
I must admit I did not know about the legal implications of the painted pictograms until I read http://bernd.sluka.de/Radfahren/Geh_und_Radweg.html today, which states that such a pictogram indicates a combined foot- and cycleway without the obligation to use it as a cyclist.

I think I make a survey tour later today and improve this part of the map.

Thanks for taking a look :)
JC
emvee (2020-09-03 10:22:02+00:00): Thanks JC!

If you wonder how I stumbled upon this, see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/JuanCarlos80, but keep in mind what is on the top of the page "This page shows issues on elements that were last modified by 'JuanCarlos80'. This doesn't means that this user is responsible for all these issues."

I was the last one changing the relation so therefore I also saw/see the "Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle" messages

Greetings,

Martin.
*abq* (2020-08-02 07:52:25+00:00): Please don't use highway=footway for hiking trails. Use highway=path instead.
Regards, Reiner
DD1GJ (2020-07-07 08:57:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7686791815/history

Ein Fußgängerüberweg in einer verkehrsberuhigten Zone?
Frans S (2020-07-09 15:18:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
You mapped a serious quantity of buildings. Great job,
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key. You missed  quite a number. (Not only on this changeset.
Best regards and keep mapping
b-jazz (2020-07-07 23:43:35+00:00): Hi AduptUniform, thanks for the additions to OSM. Are you using satellite imagery (or local knowledge) that is relatively new? The area I'm looking at has this going through a parking lot and I'm wondering why a living street exists in a parking lot. Has there been some construction there I'm not aware of? Thanks.