piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
djhorn18 (2021-01-03 23:52:55+00:00): You're commenting on a 4 year ago change, to an account that had been probably about as dormant.  I'd honestly forgotten I'd done any of this.  Any source I used would have been satellite imagery available in the editor(at that time 4 years ago), mixed with basic knowledge of the area(for the more forested areas). Back then, there were really no buildings outside of hanover, and I was heavily into using OSM at the time and just wanted a better representation of the area I lived, and to basically lay a groundwork for someone else to come through and make changes as needed in the future.  The satellite imagery back then wasn't great quality, so if it's improved feel free to update them. I no longer use OSM and will be removing myself from notifications further.
dgitto (2016-06-08 21:29:24+00:00): I don't think that is the proper name of the church. Please read the wiki : name tag
BCNorwich (2016-06-02 06:16:45+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, your changes have nearly all resulted in the misalignment of ways and buildings. Also the deletion of the name from a section of Charing Cross Road. As the inadvertent changes are intertwined it would be best to revert all of the changeset thus being sure to correct all misalignment's. If you wish I can revert the changeset for you? Regards.
Email also sent and I await a reply.
Владимир К (2016-07-08 11:59:06+00:00): Удалите "пос. Починки" из улиц
literan (2016-06-02 12:16:57+00:00): landuse=forest это неверный тег (он для лесопитомников, лесных плантаций). Вместо него используйте, пожалуйста, natural=wood
DimaMashnikov (2016-06-03 06:33:59+00:00): посмотрите в описании, там явно указано лесопосадки, это как раз они, посажены человеком и обслуживаются.
literan (2016-06-03 07:45:27+00:00): Я эти описания знаю вдоль и поперек. Вы пишете про последний, наиболее редко использовавшийся подход http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse=forest?uselang=ru#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D0.B4.D1.85.D0.BE.D0.B4_3 , который сейчас, после обсуждений в форуме, практически никем не используется. Я просто советую вам, не спорить со всей Россией, а ставить natural=wood. Все равно рано или поздно кто-то придет и исправит.
DimaMashnikov (2016-06-03 13:08:51+00:00): спорить не будем очень несущественная тема. в россии живем же, если в описании написано лесопосадки то применяют везде кроме лесопосадок)
DimaMashnikov (2016-06-03 13:10:51+00:00): править надеюсь никто это не станет, т.к. очень много площадей вобще не отраженных на карте, вот там надо править.
literan (2016-06-03 14:17:03+00:00): сдается мне, что как только на openstreetmap.org вдруг перестанут рендерить landuse=forest как крайне специфический тег (или вдруг начнут его рендерить какой-то особой заливкой), вы сами первым это будете исправлять :-) Впрочем, согласен, спорить нет смысла, не очень существенный вопрос.
Andreas Binder (2016-06-01 17:43:57+00:00): Bootsfahrverbot am Königssee für Sportboot usw.
Noen (2016-06-07 12:47:46+00:00): Please do not replace local names with foreign transliterations.
Chrysopras (2018-02-11 09:20:04+00:00): Hallo Yokr,

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz bei einigen Gebäuden am Ulmenweg zwar die Adressdaten komplett erfasst, aber addr:street weggelassen (z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93584846).

Keine Kritik, ich möchte nur nachfragen: War das Absicht, sprich, hast Du Zweifel, dass diese Adressen tatsächlich zum Ulmenweg gehören? Dann war das Weglassen von addr:street eine gute Idee!

Oder war es nur ein Versehen, wie es mir auch immer wieder passiert?

Viele Grüße!
Yokr (2018-02-13 17:24:33+00:00): Hallo Chrysopras,

ich weiß es nicht mehr. Sieht aber zumindest sehr plausibel aus, dass sie zum Ulmenweg gehören. Ich denke die Straße kannst du ruhig eintragen oder?

Viele Grüße
Chrysopras (2018-02-15 10:04:25+00:00): Hallo Yokr,

danke für Deine Antwort! Habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56379220 erledigt.

Herzliche Grüße!
Commodoortje (2016-06-02 09:30:29+00:00): Ik vroeg me af waarom je een spatie achter de naam geplaatst hebt.
habi (2019-10-25 13:45:57+00:00): According to the [OSM Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor) 'addr:floor' "is not commonly used". I added the according "level" tag where appropriate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2696584431/
freebeer (2019-10-26 03:06:57+00:00): addr:floor as part of a complete postal address is in fact used in some places; an example i know would be a block of flats in danmark, which also includes an additional field to indicate whether the particular address location can be found to the right or to the left.  this would be appropriate to keep in addr:* as it is in fact used for postal addressing and delivery.

i do not recall seeing any such designation on swiss addresses, with centrally-located postboxes, although i vaguely recall seeing something for one particular business, but it could be my dementia acting up again, and while not needed for post delivery, may be useful for in-person visiting, to know how many flights of stairs need be conquered.
user_5359 (2016-06-02 04:53:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
nyuriks (2017-10-01 08:45:22+00:00): Hi, many Deutsche Post have "brand:wikidata", but others use "operator:brand".  Should they use the same?
Reclus (2017-10-01 12:52:05+00:00): Hello!

Taginfo doesn't find any "operator:brand".

This article in the OSM wiki suggests using both brand and operator keys.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister

For every operator and brand key I put in an additional :wikidata key, so there will be more structured data in the OSM database in the future.

So, there should be four keys on every post box operated by Deutsche Post. (brand, brand:wikidata, operator and operator:wikidata)
nyuriks (2017-10-01 17:23:03+00:00): OOOPS,  sorry,  I meant brand:wikidata and operator:wikidata :)    There are currently many objects like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/773508846 - it has wikipedia/wikidata instead of brand:wikidata and operator:wikidata.  Can you fix them too? Thanks!
nyuriks (2017-10-01 17:30:14+00:00): P.S.  I meant these objects:  http://tinyurl.com/y94mwwsg
Reclus (2017-10-01 18:51:34+00:00): These objects are street cabinets operated by Deutsche Post for internal use by Deutsche Post. It doesn't make sense to put brand/brand:wikidata on them IMHO.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=street%20cabinet

Your tool should be fixed instead.
nyuriks (2017-10-01 18:54:07+00:00): My tool simply shows a search result, just like OverpassTurbo, so hard to fix that :). I agree that it probably doesn't make sense to tag these objects with the brand.  Does it make sense to mark them with wikipedia tag?
Reclus (2017-10-01 19:07:01+00:00): No. Please see:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia

"only provide links to articles which are 'about the feature'. A link from St Paul's Cathedral in London to an article about St Paul's Cathedral on Wikipedia is fine. A link from a bus depot to the company that operates it is not (see section below)."

The second level Wikipedia links aren't useful any more. Wikidata tags like operator:wikidata etc. are much better.
nyuriks (2017-10-01 19:51:52+00:00): Reclus, I agree with you 100% !  That's what I meant. We should rename "wikipedia" tag into something else, like "operator:wikipedia" or "brand:wikipedia", etc.  And we should add corresponding "operator:wikidata".  All these objects need to be fixed:   http://tinyurl.com/y94mwwsg
nyuriks (2017-10-01 19:52:48+00:00): And yes, I am not sure if we need wikipedia tags there at all, but other community members keep saying they need them :(
Reclus (2017-10-01 20:15:06+00:00): No, the wikipedia tag (1st level) is well defined and should not be renamed. Please see:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia

For every wikipedia tag there should be a wikidata tag added. And there are people doing this right now. In the future the wikipedia tags might be removed. But not until all software supports that.

operator:wikipedia and brand:wikipedia don't make sense any more and should be replaced by operator:wikidata and brand:wikidata. I don't think any software at all uses operator:wikipedia or brand:wikipedia.

In Witten every feature with a wikipedia tag also has a wikidata tag and operator:wikidata and brand:wikidata tags are widely used. So nothing to do here.
nyuriks (2017-10-01 22:35:42+00:00): I agree with everything about operator:wikidata & brand:wikidata.

The first portion about key:wikipedia -- from the osm wiki:  "only provide links to articles which are 'about the feature'. A link from St Paul's Cathedral in London to an article about St Paul's Cathedral on Wikipedia is fine. A link from a bus depot to the company that operates it is not (see section below).".

So I don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3376969992 should have a wikipedia tag, only operator:wikidata or brand:wikidata.
Reclus (2017-10-01 22:54:27+00:00): Yes, that's right. But also brand and operator. (It should have brand, brand:wikidata, operator and operator:wikidata.)
nyuriks (2017-10-01 22:57:29+00:00): Cool, will you be able to fix it?  There is a lot of backlash currently for me to edit in DE, I'm waiting for things to settle a bit. Thx!
Reclus (2017-10-01 23:09:06+00:00): No, but there is for example MapRoulette which could help finding people to do it.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapRoulette
nyuriks (2017-10-02 03:45:45+00:00): I hope to use it, but it does not work with OSM object IDs. You cannot give it a set of OSM objects, and say that these tags are wrong, and should probably be another set - please confirm.  You can give it a few broken polygons and tell people to fix it.
kartler175 (2016-08-28 20:37:31+00:00): Dazu braucht man keinen neuen Weg anlegen, man ändert die Eigenschaften des bestehenden Weges.
zalex_ua (2017-04-18 12:29:13+00:00): Яке джерело інформації що у Мегамаркеті в Гатному номер будівлі 2a ?
Це дублікат. На гарячій лінії сказали що це номер 2в.
Ukraroad (2017-04-19 05:10:45+00:00): Може бути, Вам видніше, я до них не дзвонив. Хіба бачив на рекламі, так і написав. Але якщо так кажуть, то вже ж не брешуть.
zalex_ua (2017-04-19 15:02:48+00:00): Ок, дякую за відгук !
user_5359 (2016-06-02 04:52:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You say Sears closed the shop, but you delete only the name. So did an other doityourself shop exists under a other name at this place?
Q002105 (2016-06-02 11:31:37+00:00): No, the building is empty. I just neglected to remove the tag.
user_5359 (2016-06-02 14:12:35+00:00): Done.
Владимир К (2016-06-12 09:07:05+00:00): обсуждение ваших ошибок 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=596318#p596318
naoliv (2016-06-01 20:34:26+00:00): Denis, quem for pegar a avenida precisa ir até o semáforo agora?
E nesses casos onde há remoção de um trecho de rua, geralmente é melhor deixar o caminho presente no mapa mas sem as tags de rua (apenas com uma nota explicando que não existe mais). Isso evita que alguém olhe a imagem desatualizada do Bing, por exemplo, e reinsira o mesmo trecho novamente.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:19:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:19:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:19:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:19:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2016-06-08 22:28:31+00:00): Hallo Aalen1,
leider gibt es nichts besseres.

Dein Tag war leider falsch verwendet, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline. "incline=up" ist "key=value" und nicht nur "key".
mueschel hats bereits korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39777759

Ich bezweifle allerdings, dass die Werte nun richtig sind...
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dgitto (2016-06-02 13:00:12+00:00): Very good job, thankyou. Are you there now?
seichter (2016-06-02 13:05:37+00:00): have been there one week ago
dgitto (2016-06-02 13:15:13+00:00): bad luck. we miss very few post offices in Messina province. and Filicudi is one of that.
hallo
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-03 09:24:13+00:00): Have you actually explained to the mappers whose work you changed here what you think "power_source is deprecated" in OSM means?  I have asked this before, in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35786763 , but got no answer there.
 If their previous tagging was incorrect, how will they know not to use it next time?
Olyon (2016-06-03 19:35:57+00:00): power_source is deprecated (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power_source). Use generator:source (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator). For photovoltaic panel : generator:source=solar and generator:method=photovoltaic
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 16:33:48+00:00): No - not explain to me; explain to the mappers who mapped these features in the first place.
mweper (2016-06-02 17:45:03+00:00): Hola Mariela. Gracias por colaborar. Te aconsejo que no dupliques PDIs, si ya existe uno en el mapa. Por favor, agrega los datos en el área de la escuela ya existente.
--
Cualquier duda, me puedes consultar.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:26:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-03 09:27:15+00:00): It would be very helpful to explain what you've actually joined to what rather than using cryptic changeset comments that begin with "#to-fix".  It would also be better if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet :)
ediyes (2016-06-03 13:20:49+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse!

I'm not sure how this happened since I'm working with To-Fix Plugin, maybe I could have confused the layers while downloading data manually. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback"
pnorman (2016-06-03 23:50:06+00:00): You're still using similar changeset comments
ediyes (2016-06-06 22:07:08+00:00): Agreed, we can be a bit more specific here. We'll change the current brief description to "Connected accidentally disconnected highways." This should, together with small bounding boxes be very clear. Thanks for the heads up.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 16:43:04+00:00): You're still doing it - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39865489 runs from the US midwest to China, and the changeset comment is just "#to-fix:overlappingminorhighways, Fixing minor highways which overlap other major highways, http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/task/overlappingminorhighways".  It doesn't give me any clues what might have changed locally to me and why.
AgusQui (2016-06-09 16:41:14+00:00): Gaby por favor tene mas cuidado con tus ediciones, le cambiaste el nombre a la ciudad de Mar del Plata y a un barrio de la misma.
dgitto (2016-06-06 19:24:26+00:00): Ciao. Dovresti aggiungere al civico l'informazione sulla via ,addr:street.
Altrimenti non ha senso.
Usa almeno ID, ti prego. MAPS.me non è un editor serio.
Daniele
Marco Turchetto (2016-06-08 15:29:15+00:00): Scusa, non ho idea di cosa sia successo... pensavo di aver impostato un segnalibro di Mpas.me... evidentemente ho fatto una modifica visibile a tutti...
Cerco di capire come rimediare.
Grazie per la segnalazione,
mueschel (2016-06-03 12:07:05+00:00): Hallo,
bei den Adress-Tags hat sich ein kleiner Fehler eingeschlichen: "addr:coutry" anstelle von "addr:country". Korrigierst du das? An sich wird das in DE nicht benötigt, da alle Grenzrelationen gut gepflegt sind und die Lage in Land/Bundesland/Kreis genau dokumentiert ist.

Gruß, Jan
is-zUser (2016-06-03 14:58:15+00:00): Hallo, besten Dank für den Tipp! Kleiner Fehler große Wirkung, da ständig weiterkopiert. :-(
Gruß IS-Zuser
literan (2016-06-02 12:18:36+00:00): от балды статусы дорог назначаете?  ознакомьтесь: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
chnav (2016-06-02 14:09:31+00:00): Никогда и ничего не удаляйте в ОСМ пока не появится достаточно опыта. Восстановил здание, перенес теги магазина на него.
chnav (2016-06-02 14:15:54+00:00): Восстановил удаленное здание.
Пожалуйста не ставьте теги своей кондитерской на всё здание бизнес-центра.
pertile (2016-06-02 11:58:49+00:00): Hola Granova, te consulto por qué modificaste la escuela para que tenga forma de círculo, es un error que encontramos muy a menudo pero no sabemos a qué se debe, si el botón para transformar en círculo está muy cerca de otro, si la idea es que la escuela se vea distintos, lo que puedas aportar será muy útil.
Hjart (2016-06-02 07:44:04+00:00): I OSM er det generelt en rigtig god ide at holde landuse og vejnet (highway=*) adskilt. Derfor har jeg tilladt mig at lave dette lidt om.
user_5359 (2016-06-02 04:42:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Carlos Brys (2016-06-04 15:04:01+00:00): Eliminé el nodo de dirección, porque ya existe el mismo nodo como vecindario
malenki (2016-06-05 06:53:46+00:00): Hallo Wayne,
in diesem Changeset hast du das Horber Gäßle nach Horber Gässle umbenannt. War das Absicht oder ein Versehen?
Falls Ersteres: gibt es vor Ort Schilder mit "Gässle"?
WayneSchlegel (2016-06-05 11:50:09+00:00): Die Straße wird vor Ort komplett mit "Horber Gässle" ausgeschildert.
user_101460 (2016-06-04 02:16:46+00:00): こんにちは。nogajunと申します。

建物のタグについてですが、iDエディタの翻訳がミスっているので「大学の建物」(building=college)ではなく、「大学」(building=university)を選んでください。

修正されたので、iDエディタが更新されれば「大学の建物」は「短大・高専・専門学校」に直ると思いますが、それまでは気をつけていただければと思います。
chihchun (2016-06-02 11:14:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
chihchun (2016-06-02 11:17:31+00:00): 已經為您修正商店的類型為汽車維修店。
Ballard OpenStreetMap (2017-04-04 19:11:42+00:00): Fountain Nightclub? Or Foundation?
muralito (2016-06-02 13:11:16+00:00): Estimado, es a la inversa, por favor no hacer cambios poniendo datos incorrectos solo para que se vean en el mapa, eso es "Mapear para el render". Las manzanas no son mapeadas con building=residential, son con place=city=block.
El building es para edificios de forma individual.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-17 14:07:56+00:00): Hello!

Sorry for bothering you about an ancient edit, but looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4220797212 - it seems like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store would be a good match.

Do you agree with such retagging? Or would it be better to not edit without resurvey?
JessAk71 (2024-03-17 16:53:52+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny! Yes certainly I think that change would be great. The poi may not be there anymore though but the change would be fine regardless, feel free to edit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-17 18:12:15+00:00): changed then!

And yes, it is likely gone but it may make resurvey easier as shop type will be shown to mapper (if they use presets)
user_5359 (2016-06-02 14:23:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the address to the buildings, which I added. The driveway was added by pratikyadav (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39725387).
Rezequiel (2016-06-02 13:52:39+00:00): Buen día Yamila. Paso a hacerte una observación con respecto a este conjunto de cambios que introduciste.
Noté varios nodos totalmente desacoplados sin ningún uso en particular, que solo entorpece la vista y edición de los mapas. Te pido por favor revises muy bien antes de subir cambios y constates de que esa información, es fehaciente y se puede encontrar aval de la misma. 
Ante cualquier cosa, no dudes en consultarme, mi nombre es Ezequiel y trabajo para el Municipio en el área de TIC informática, y parte de mi trabajo, es geocodificar nuestra ciudad acá en OSM para hacer uso de esos datos con aplicaciones que estamos desarrollando.
Desde ya agradezco tu atención. Saludos.
pertile (2016-06-02 17:40:25+00:00): Hola Ezequiel, es cierto que los datos no tienen un uso en particular y es muy bueno que alguien del Municipio esté metido en OSM, le hace muy bien al proyecto. Pero al ser esto un proyecto abierto es complicado pretender que toda la base esté limpia, siempre va a haber ediciones que no sigan las premisas que pretendemos, lo que tenemos que hacer es incentivar a los usuarios a participar como bien hacés en el último párrafo, quizás la usuaria no entendió bien cómo se usa eso es todo.
Rezequiel (2016-06-03 12:45:50+00:00): Hola pertile, es muy probable que mi comentario no haya transmitido la verdadera intención que pretendía. No pretendo generar ninguna discordia, simplemente la contacto y le informo lo que estuvo mal en su commit (siguiendo las buenas prácticas promovidas y provistas por el vasto foro de OSM) para dejar el mapa lo más completo y útil posible (pretención que tenemos jnto con mis compañeros).
De cualquier forma Yamila, si tenés dudas a cerca de las buenas prácticas que menciono, buscá por Google OSM Argentina, y te saldrán wikis y foros (inclusive un proyecto o grupo de colaboración en OSM en Argentina) para que puedas informarte, sacarte dudas, instruirte, etc sobre la manipulación y edición de los mapas.
Saludos.
mavl (2016-06-03 16:27:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот спорткоплекс уже обозначен точкой [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1278234866]. Ваши дублирующие теги я удалил.
Dementev (2016-06-10 11:10:03+00:00): А куда теперь само здание исчезло?
mavl (2016-06-10 14:17:42+00:00): Причина в этом пакете правок [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39889501]
Noen (2016-06-07 12:46:12+00:00): Please do no add a foreign description to the name tag.
korte walter (2016-08-08 07:40:55+00:00): Hi 愛台玩,
Your changeset contains some problems, mainly due to uploading a GPS trace as a new road. This means that it overlaps and duplicates in many places the already existing road network. I will merge your trace into the existing road network and will then delete it, I hope you do not mind.
chihchun (2016-08-08 08:09:56+00:00): Thanks, korte walter. 
愛台玩 has been doing the same thing for several hiking paths in Taiwan. Unfortunately, he does not understand the concept of "map for rendering", thanks for reviewing the changes and fix them.
user_5359 (2016-06-02 14:27:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use a node, read the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam .
Chetan_Gowda (2016-06-02 06:54:36+00:00): Hi @aygulya, seems like you forgot to tag "building=yes" for buildings. It's not "area=yes" for buildings. Please go through this wiki on how to tag buildings. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings and https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping%20Common%20Features. 

Happy mapping
Chetan
Bernhard W (2017-12-08 20:11:30+00:00): Warum hast du beispielsweise bei der neuapostolischen Kirche (Radeberger Straße 24, 68309 Mannheim) alle Adressdaten und den Gebäudetyp (church) gelöscht?