piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2017-12-04 14:06:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2017-12-07 06:04:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A House have an address, but not the street. Please mark the right (main) building and add the address there.
sperlingskauz (2018-02-17 21:50:51+00:00): Dear Odewale Afees,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=unclassified, since there is already the tagging highway=unclassified, probably it was just a typo. 
Regards,
sperlingskauz
Miselajus (2017-12-04 21:04:43+00:00): Hallo,
zu deiner review-Anfrage: Wenn du deine gps-Aufzeichnung zugrunde gelegt hast, scheint der korrigierte Pfadverlauf wohl in Ordnung zu sein.
Deine Änderungen von highway=path in highway=footway ist wohl so nicht richtig. highway=footway wird nur verwendet bei einem blauen Fußgängerschild (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway). Nach meiner Erinnerung ist das hier nicht der Fall, also einfach wieder ändern.
Weiter viel Spaß beim mappen.
Gruß
Miselajus
ACS1986 (2017-12-04 15:44:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM. 
Edits that are removed ('reverted') leave a trace. Looking at your history this edit today appears to be your only one covering Queens Park. Did you actually save your changes the first time round? Maybe there was some technical issue and your upload failed. Very unusual. 
Kind regards,
Adam
freebeer (2017-12-05 16:45:19+00:00): Hi,
Nothing of significance in this park has been removed; you added footpaths that were not mapped until now, but which I can see in aerial imagery.
Is it possible you are using Pokemon Go which used to use google maps until a few days ago?  This seems to be a significant issue now for supposedly-missing items.
Thanks for adding the new paths to OpenStreetMap!
Cyrtor (2017-12-05 18:33:48+00:00): Hi, Sorry guys your right to believe i noticed this missing path through the Pokemon Go app but I was under the assumption it had been using this map service for a long time hence my confusion as to where the road went, anyway il continue to add in paths and such as I notice them.
freebeer (2017-12-06 15:18:33+00:00): No need to be sorry, on the contrary!
I'm very overjoyed and grateful that you have confirmed this to me (and some others), as you are the first to reply out of several whom I have asked.
That said, a warm welcome from me to OpenStreetMap, pull up a bollard!
(I in no way speak on behalf of OSM)
.
Your experience is being echoed by countless others, and it has been merely a guess on my part as to what might be the cause, so it is good to know that for once in my life I've done something right.
This also helps me tailor my responses to others seeing the same sort of problem.
We welcome your continuing contributions, as we know there is still a lot missing from the map around you, and the more people who pitch in, the more complete things will become.
Thanks again, and keep mapping!
aharvey (2019-04-21 02:54:08+00:00): It looks like you've moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/762068183 into the lagoon, I fixed this for you, please be careful next time not to drag nodes around.
surveyor54 (2017-12-04 18:51:56+00:00): Hallo Punkti12,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine ersten Änderungen.

Das landuse=residential sollte eigentlich nicht gelöscht werden.

siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=de

Wenn möglich, die Konturen der Gebäude etwas genauer erfassen. Ich weiß, die Luftbilder haben keine so gute Qualität.

Gruß
svr54
literan (2017-12-04 15:24:49+00:00): приветствую! barrier=ditch это тег для канавы-препятствия (например, если вырыли поперек дороги, чтобы нельзя было проехать). А для обычных канав надо применять waterway=ditch. Я поправлю здесь.
ToniE (2017-12-04 17:18:13+00:00): Helo Dumitru,

welcome to OSM.

I have a note to the building:
Gür (92029672, v3)

I suppose, the electrician is not the only user of the house, maybe some apartments are in the 1st floor?

In that case, tagging craft=electician at the outline of the house is not really correct.

A new node inside the house should be created instead, having the craf= and name= (and also addr:*=) of the "Gür".
The name= and craft= should then be remove from the house.

Do you have the opporunity to chack that again and modify accordingly if necessary?

Best regadrs
Toni
Dumitru Popovici (2017-12-04 21:12:06+00:00): hello Toni,
thanks for the tip. How can i fix only this one then?
ToniE (2017-12-05 13:56:59+00:00): Hi,

you have already done the 50% part by removing the craf and name from the house.
I just added a new node/point, assigning carf, name and addr:* to it.

BTW: from the aerial photos I assume that this house might have appartments only.

Does the electrician "Gür" live here or does he run a businiess here?
Br
Toni
Dumitru Popovici (2017-12-10 10:48:03+00:00): hi,
i think he does run a business out here, found his phone number too
robertkupis (2017-12-04 14:45:04+00:00): EDIT: Nie budynek, tylko ogrodzone miejsce wycinki.
Chris Fleming (2017-12-05 14:55:04+00:00): Are you sure. I had these mapped as private gardens? They are certainly private residences?
literan (2017-12-04 15:27:50+00:00): crossing=pelican это британская классификация переходов, применяется только в U.K. Вычищу.
bridgeconst (2017-12-04 20:39:40+00:00): Первоначально я поставил traffic_signal, но потом захотел уточнить, что пешеходный сигнал загорается только по кнопке
literan (2017-12-04 20:57:35+00:00): button_operated=yes
crossing=traffic_signals
highway=crossing. В JOSM все это есть в заготовках тегов, в iD - не в курсе.
viloan (2017-12-04 14:50:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2017-12-04 15:20:11+00:00): Вы навесили на пруд разнообразных тегов, не имеющих никакого отношения к пруду. Также добавили этот пруд как члена отношений "бизнес-центр" и "Ленинградское шоссе". Все это я вычистил.
damndog (2018-01-01 19:44:26+00:00): Panie kolego (Pani koleżanko?) Proszę o uzasadnienie tego zestawu zmian.
damndog (2018-01-07 19:28:05+00:00): W wyniku braku odpowiedzi, cofam ten zestaw zmian. Uzasadnienie: usunięto istniejące w rzeczywistości drogi serwisowe. 
{tego samego typu drogi u sąsiadów Zachorskich już nie przeszkadzały? zabawne...}
Contradito (2017-12-04 19:45:32+00:00): fiz
user_5359 (2017-12-07 05:59:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You paint a building with three points (in one line). What are you trying to do?
viloan (2017-12-04 15:00:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2017-12-04 15:18:12+00:00): Валерий, добрый день. Парковая зона не может пересекать пол-пруда - что-то вы придумываете. К тому же в OSM принято все делать аккуратно (а вы сделали тяп-ляп, утащили неизвестно куда пешеходный переход, прилепили точку парка к автодороге). Эту правку придется отменить
hsimpson (2017-12-06 19:43:07+00:00): Hallo andé,
Deine Änderungen sind leider total daneben!
Dass die Einbahnstraße für Farradfahrer freigegeben was ist bereits durch oneway:bicycle=no, bzw. cycleway=opposite ausreichend gekennzeichnet. wenn du oneway auf no setzt, dann bedeutet das, dass da jeder auch mit dem Auto andersrum durch darf, was definitiv nicht der Fall ist.
-
Dass du hier jetzt wild alle Straßen auf oneway=no setzt sehe ich als vandalismus an und werde daher alle von dir erstellten Changesets jetzt reverten.
-
Ich bitte dich darum, derartige Änderungen in Zukunft zu unterlassen, andernfalls werde ich weitere Schritte dagegen einleiten.
-
Bevor du weiter OpenStreetMaps bearbeitest, bitte ich dich darum, das Wiki zu besuchen http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ oder nach einem OSM-Tutorial zu googlen. Wenn du dann noch Fragen hast, kannst du dich auch gerne an das Forum wenden!
-
Viele Grüße,
hsimpson
hsimpson (2017-12-06 19:48:56+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde aufgrund von Vandalismus durch http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54412026 revertiert.
andé (2017-12-07 08:19:59+00:00): Gescheiter wäre es, wenn hsimpson Vorschläge machen könnte, wie im System für Radfahrer freigegebene Straßen auch zur Routenplanung genutzt werden könnten. So wird der Radfahrer auf idiotische Umwege des Autofahrers gelenkt. Bin neu im System, habe mich über die Autovoreingenommenheit des Systems geärgert. So ist das System für Routenplanung in Städten für Radfahrer nicht geeignet. Ein etwas weniger ruppiger Ton des hsimpson wäre angemessen.
ande
highflyer74 (2017-12-07 10:05:14+00:00): Moin andé!

OSM ist nicht per se "autovoreingenommen". In OSM werden nur die Daten erfasst, die dann wiederum von Routern (also "Navis") zur Erstellung einer Route benutzt werden. Wie diese dann routen, hängt nur bedingt von OSM ab. Wir erfassen hier die Daten nach einem bestimmten Schema, damit diese durch Software genutzt werden können. 

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Hilfe findest Du auch im Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php

Viele Grüße!
hsimpson (2017-12-07 14:05:43+00:00): Also JOSM routet mich zuverlässig über solche Wege, auch brouter macht das ohne Probleme.
Selbst die Router auf der Hauptseite (GraphHopper und Mapzen) haben keine Probleme mit oneway:bicycle=no: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=50.7144%2C7.1051%3B50.7082%2C7.1080#map=16/50.7114/7.1067
-
Jetzt würde mich interessieren, welchen Router du verwendet hast, dass der noch nicht mal mit cycleway=opposite klar kommt. Entsprechende Straßen hattest du ja auch geändert.
-
Zu deiner Antwort: "Gescheiter wäre es, wenn hsimpson Vorschläge machen könnte, wie im System für Radfahrer freigegebene Straßen auch zur Routenplanung genutzt werden könnten."
Zunächst eimal ist es ausgesprochen unhöflich, mit seinem Gegenüber in der dritten Person zu sprechen. Dann brauche ich keine solchen Vorschläge zu machen, wenn die entsprechenden Tags schon ewig existieren. oneway:bicycle=no und das ältere cycleway=opposite wurden genau dafür geschaffen, um zu Zeigen, dass Radler hier auch in die entgegengesetzte Richtung fahren dürfen. Leider sind die Routingprogramme auf OSM-Basis immer nur Produkte von dritten, auf die wir allenfalls einen sehr begrenzten Einfluss haben und daher nicht garantieren können, dass diese tatsächlich das tun, was sie behaupten. Aber trotzdem interessiert mich, welchen Router du verwendet hast, sodasss man da auch nochmal auf Fehlersuche gehen kann.
-
Viele Grüße,
hsimpson
surveyor54 (2017-12-04 18:35:33+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine ersten Änderungen.
Ein Tipp, die Gebäude sind doch eigentlich rechtwinklig, nach dem Zeichnen einfach die Taste "S" drücken.
Wenn möglich, die Konturen der Gebäude etwas genauer erfassen.  Ich weiß, die Luftbilder haben keine so gute Qualität.

Könntest du das bitte noch korrigieren.

Viele Grüße

svr54
viloan (2017-12-04 15:42:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Osm1980 (2019-01-09 17:27:43+00:00): salam chera tage masir ro be unclassified taghir dadid?
Kiranr (2017-12-05 07:03:17+00:00): Are you Serious
eggie (2017-12-04 16:35:18+00:00): Een natural=water in een bos ga je niet zien op de kaart. Dat hoort in een relatie te liggen. Ik kijk even naar je edit.
eggie (2017-12-04 16:39:28+00:00): natural=water in landuse=forest is'nt visible on the map. Is there realy a pond here to be honest? No pond to see at the pdok 2016
eggie (2017-12-04 18:34:28+00:00): pokemon?  please reply...
Renolodos (2017-12-04 21:06:06+00:00): Er is daadwerkelijk een klein vijvertje aangelegd door het pandbeheer team van ACTA kompleet met looppad en bankjes, ik snap niet wat dit met pokemon te maken heeft?
eggie (2017-12-04 21:13:02+00:00): Ik zet het in een multipolygoon-relatie anders zie je bomen en water door elkaar.
Er wordt op het moment een grote hoeveelheid natural=water + water=pond getagd.. daar dit het spel van pokemon zou beïnvloeden. Ook parkedits zitten in het "verdachtenhoekje".. vandaar mijn vraag. Graag begrip daarvoor. De schade is groot. 
Bedankt voor je reactie. Het water zal straks zonder bomen zichtbaar zijn.
eggie (2017-12-04 21:15:00+00:00): Done!
Renolodos (2017-12-05 14:42:18+00:00): Ah snap ik! Lijkt me ook wel irritant om dingen die niet bestaan op de kaart te hebben. Bedankt voor het fixen, ik probeer zsm te leren hoe het allemaal moet. Ik kan een foto van het vijvertje posten voor de zekerheid.
eggie (2017-12-05 15:07:21+00:00): Dag... Lodorenos.. Een foto is echt niet nodig.. OSM is gebaseerd op vertrouwen :)
blackadder (2017-12-07 13:55:57+00:00): Welcometo OSM :-)
You added a duplicate item as a test? Please note when you edit you are editing the live OSM database so please do not use it for testing. I have reverted the changeset containing the edit.
user_5359 (2017-12-07 05:49:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 
I also change your leisure=park with the name="parking lot" to a simple "amenity"="parking".
user_5359 (2017-12-07 05:50:44+00:00): additional point: If the building with the name "TD Bank" is a money institut, please add an amenity=bank to it.
majid1359 (2017-12-04 16:25:32+00:00): لطفا تغییرات امروز کاملا در آپدیت نقشه ها اعمال شود از سافتگ به openstreet  منتقل شود سرعت رندر زیاد کنید با تشکر
JamesKingdom (2017-12-04 19:50:49+00:00): This is not a park! I have changed it back.
JamesKingdom (2017-12-04 19:53:30+00:00): I have changed this back to grass.
BlinkingNora (2017-12-04 20:27:25+00:00): "Back" implies it has ever been anything but a park for the last 3+ years.
corfede (2017-12-08 12:01:34+00:00): Io avevo mappato la Banca Popolare Pugliese insieme al suo bancomat nella posizione in cui si trovano in piazza Mazzini. Vedo che hai spostato solo il bancomat. Si tratta di un errore o c'è stato realmente uno spostamento?
corfede (2017-12-11 09:06:08+00:00): Ho verificato sul posto ed il bancomat si trova nella posizione dove l'avevo inserito. Nella nuova posizione non ci sono né bancomat né banche, quindi procedo al revert.
ssav1977 (2017-12-12 11:58:49+00:00): Corretto il revert, non avevo accesso ad un pc e non avevo potuto correggere il mio errore. Grazie
corfede (2017-12-12 13:02:38+00:00): Grazie a te per il riscontro. Ciao, Federico.
user_5359 (2017-12-07 05:44:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node with maxspeed over 100 meters, so he exists in the middle of a park. Is this correct?
viloan (2017-12-04 16:37:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2017-12-05 05:15:34+00:00): Hello! Why did you add an additional way with area=yes (with nearly the same structure of the leisure=park)?
I have deleted this unnecessary construct.
pantufla (2023-04-19 18:32:37+00:00): Hello Zverik. I see Barcelona is not represented under the current standard of relations and I see you did changes on all the coverage. I'm going to start making changes which will be basically reverting these changes you did way back. I'll follow the wiki. I only wanted to be sure this is ok as this is a large scale task and I've heard from the Catalan community that this was made to allign back then with the Maps.Me integration. Please let me know this is ok. I'll use this as the basic: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area
Zverik (2023-04-20 05:44:18+00:00): Hey pantufla! The subway system was adjusted according to this document: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping

You are referring to the wiki page written 7 years ago, and it's not the definitive source for the tagging.

With this change you will definitely break the Barcelona system for Organic Maps, Maps.Me, and whichever other apps use the schema. See the validation page here: https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/spain.html

So, you can do that, I won't stop you, but you would make the subway system unusable for people in favour of some obsolete tagging practices.
pantufla (2023-04-20 11:44:37+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. I'll take the time to review and take a broader and deeper look into it before/if I start  doing changes. I'll try to reply again soon.
sammuell (2018-02-20 22:02:55+00:00): Is there anyway we could change the default name north of the border? The name "Red River of the North" is never used in Manitoba, and its official name is just "Red River" (Rivière rouge in French).
Skybunny (2018-02-22 03:21:01+00:00): I don't see why not. It can even just be a different relation with a different name, with a destination of 'Red River of the North', that ends at the border, if that's where the name changes.
sammuell (2018-02-25 00:30:59+00:00): Sounds fair, thanks!
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:05:06+00:00): Hello Rigi03

Once again, you have changed bridleways to footways.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387187838 is a Public Bridleway and was marked as highway=bridleway.

Further to my comments on previous changesets (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6801182), can you stop converting existing ways to footways, unless you are sure they are footways as opposed to another kind of way, please?

Jon
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:07:06+00:00): You have also changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543387566 - a public bridleway that I fixed 6 days ago from highway=bridleway to highway=footway
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:08:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543382491 - another public bridleway that I fixed 6 days ago, where you have changed highway=bridleway to highway=footway
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:09:28+00:00): Another one, this time one I last edited 11 months ago - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463737565/history
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:10:13+00:00): Another bridleway that I fixed 6 days ago - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543383387
jpennycook (2017-12-04 19:30:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543387565 is a track used as a public bridleway.  You have changed it from highway=track to highway=footway