piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:05:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
You tagged this as a residential area. Not correct. 
The whole town or village is a residential area.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794820
Jano John Akim Franke (2022-11-07 13:19:58+00:00): Bitte verwende "Replace Geometry" aus https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/UtilsPlugin2 für solche Änderungen, um die Objekt-IDs und -Geschichte zu erhalten.
Jano John Akim Franke (2022-11-07 13:20:33+00:00): Ohne Kommentar geht nicht hervor, warum die Änderung durchgeführt wurde.
CaptainCrunch (2022-11-07 13:33:25+00:00): Hm, mir war nicht bewusst, dass "vereinfachen" das Objekt löscht und neu anlegt :/

Vereinfacht deshalb, weil exzessiv viele Knoten verwendet wurden, was aufgrund der Datenlage nicht gerechtfertigt ist: "7 NM RADIUS" erfordert keine Präzision im Meterbereich.
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:02:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794893
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:30:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key .
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794941
Filip009 (2022-09-29 18:59:22+00:00): *source=iDeditor
sjakobi (2025-01-23 15:47:13+00:00): Hi!

Für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098910936 hast du offenbar smoothness=impassable eingetragen. Im Zusammenhang mit surface=asphalt und tracktype=grade1 scheint das eher unplausibel. Könnte das ein Fehler sein?

Schöne Grüße,
Simon
bus-mt (2025-01-24 22:32:28+00:00): Moin, da habe ich offenbar in Josm zu schnell auf <Enter> getippt. Soll tatsächlich intermediate sein. Ist korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161730146
OddlyAngled (2022-09-30 01:59:42+00:00): minor nit but consider adding bridge=boardwalk for the boardwalk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795363
JessAk71 (2022-09-30 17:39:54+00:00): thanks for the suggestion! I just updated it.
kapazao (2022-09-30 11:56:04+00:00): Hola, por favor no unas edificios a vías, ya que es incorrecto y estos no tienen relación alguna. Los edificios se deben dibujar sobre su base.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795510
canfe (2023-04-20 18:38:39+00:00): Come mai mappi tante strade con access=unknown come la way 1098912623 ?
Davvero c'è il dubbio che non si possa passare?
FabrizioBx (2023-05-09 18:58:53+00:00): non sò più a cosa si riferisce quella modifica. se è il percorso di strada che immagino è un tratto di strada sterrata sbarrata da due cancelli tenuti aperti e su cui è scritto proprietà privata
canfe (2023-05-11 08:09:45+00:00): Il problema non è "quella" strada e che ne hai mappate tante così!
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uO5
Puoi definirle meglio?
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:26:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795757
canfe (2022-10-09 14:35:26+00:00): Ho passato a canal il canale di Druento in quanto non drena (drain) le acque ma le preleva per scopi agricoli
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795766
canfe (2022-10-09 14:36:46+00:00): La strada non è unclassified ma una service se porta ad attività commerciali.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795843
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:24:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795865
JJIglesias (2022-09-30 16:08:12+00:00): Saludos, por error cambiaste el Nombre de la Poblacion de Saipina por el nombre 16 de Julio. Que es 16 de Julio, el Nombre de la Plaza?
Gracias
JJ
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:00:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 point :
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads. Try to avoid that.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126796017
DressyPear4 (2022-12-06 04:52:51+00:00): Olá, percebeu a grande quantidade de nós duplicados nessa área?
O josm não deu nenhum aviso?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126796031
marc_marc_repair (2024-09-26 22:48:00+00:00): Hello,
it's a bit regrettable that you didn't take the trouble to correct the problem yourself. i've deleted the >6000 orphan nodes. given that they're in the same places as other nodes, i imagine it's due to a timeout when you sent them, which meant that you sent the same thing twice.
Regards,
Marc
JLZIMMERMANN (2022-10-21 15:10:16+00:00): pour l'école Ste Anne, il s'agit d'une extension ? J'ai dessiné l'emprise de ce qui me paraissait évident
Frans S (2022-10-10 15:01:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126796432
maraf24 (2022-10-15 21:05:46+00:00): Format daty dla check_date to "2022-09-29" a nie "29.09.2022" :)
felixeee (2022-09-29 20:19:22+00:00): (Quelle: survey.)
somix (2022-10-01 06:53:49+00:00): Здравствуйте! Для урочищ есть более подходящий тег: place=locality.
PT-53 (2022-09-30 07:42:17+00:00): wald hinzu ?

Bitte gib doch korrekte Kommentare an, was Du im jeweiligen Änderungssatz gemacht hast.
PT-53 (2022-09-30 10:52:33+00:00): Du schreibst in Deiner PN:
>>> “Wald hinzu” bedeutet, dass in diesem Fall eine Waldfläche nicht als solche gekennzeichnet war und durch die Definition hinzu kam. Wäre dies eine Wiesenfläche hieße es “Wiese hinzu” oder “Buschland hinzu” usw. Du kannst dir die entsprechenden Beschreibungen / Beispiele in dem Wiki hier nachlesen. Wenn du entsprechende Flächen ohne deren Definition findest, benenne sie um die Daten / Karten hier zu vervollständigen. <<<

Und den Wald hinzufügen war der wichtigste Teil in diesem Änderungssatz?
Deine Kommentare sind für andere Mapper leider nicht hilfreich.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:21:29+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Mapper8 (2022-10-02 10:40:56+00:00): This changeset appears to touch every country except Mexico...
gscholz (2022-10-01 07:51:01+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edits have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.07424&lat=-25.91303&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126797092

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-04 05:47:10+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edits have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.07424&lat=-25.91303&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126797208

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
ivanbranco (2022-10-03 09:07:11+00:00): Ciao StRevo,

cosa ti ha fatto pensare che il photo layer "Bing Maps Aerial" fosse piu' corretto rispetto agli altri? A me sembra piu' corretto Esri o "South Tyrol Ortophoto 2020", che è quello consigliato per questa zona.
StRevo (2022-10-16 12:29:05+00:00): Ciao Ivan,

thank you for letting me know. I am updating my changes again based on Tyrol Ortophoto 2020.  Grazzie
Константин Гам (2022-10-13 08:00:00+00:00): Вносите данные, проверяя их на местности.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 12:01:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/118127518/history has shop = crystal that was added in this edit
shop=crystal ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
PCarew_EG (2025-12-08 18:23:13+00:00): As indicated on the business website there is an abundant retail area where precious rocks and crystals are sold. A new value is likely needed. 
It is a shop, has multiple activities and an overall tourist attraction. If you feel the tagging should be updated please do so, but to me it reflects what is there.
NieWnen (2022-10-01 13:21:09+00:00): Cześć,
postaraj się łączyć (przecinać) chodniki z ulicą na przejściach (i nie tylko) – tak żeby miały wspólny węzeł. Bez tego routing nie zadziała.
Z tej zmiany poprawiłem takie przejścia.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:19:59+00:00): هذه خريطة عامة أرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكنك الشخصية إلى الخريطة العامة واستخدم البرامج الشخصية لحفظ أماكنك الشخصية
radis noir (2022-09-29 21:15:31+00:00): si besoin, petite photo pour comprendre https://cloud.infini.fr/s/zLcoJjCz2McKkg4
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 10:37:03+00:00): Proszę, przeczytaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Frans S (2022-09-30 15:01:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799113
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:59:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799224
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:51:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not accurate at all  and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
A rectangular building can be mapped with 4 nodes. When there is an extension, 6 nodes. etc.

* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799343
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:58:05+00:00): I have reviewed several of your changesets. they all suffer from the same issues.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799343
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:48:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, do not include the shadow of a building (black lines next to it)

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799403
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:46:08+00:00): Hello again. 
Again, my comments in other changesets apply. Here you have an area mapped as scrub. In this project, only buildings and roads should be mapped.
If you do map such an area anyhow, make sure not to map over buildings or link nodes.
These are all errors.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126799502
whammo (2022-09-30 16:40:45+00:00): Hi Isaac, welcome to OSM and thanks for editing in Arlington! On OSM, we usually only give names to houses if they are historic (like Mount Vernon, Dumbarton House, etc) or are otherwise well-known. I've also aligned house #2614 to its location as I can see it in imagery. Of course, please check that I got it right. Thanks!
eggie (2022-09-30 16:42:06+00:00): Dag sekai.. Je vraagt feedback..

Wanneer je iets verandert aan het aantal lanes dan zullen de turn:lanes ook aangepast moeten worden.
Hier even wat leesvoer om je tanden in te zetten..

Rijstroken taggen 



    Wat tips om rijstroken in te tekenen:  
    - Rijbaan: aparte way  
    - Rijstrook: dezelfde way, aangegeven met tags lanes en tags eindigend op :lanes  
    - Bij een op- of afrit is de punt van het puntstuk in principe de locatie om de way van de op- of afrit te laten beginnen.  
    - Aantal rijstroken (bijv. 3): lanes=3  
    - Voorsorteervakken: turn:lanes=left|through|through;right (een pipe | geeft de scheiding tussen rijstroken aan, een puntkomma als er meerdere waarden op een rijstrook thuishoren, zoals through;right)  
    - Uitvoegstrook: turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right of turn:lanes=||slight_right (geen tekst is gelijk aan none, maar het gebruik van none kan in dit geval duidelijker zijn)  
    - Doorgetrokken streep (bijv. tussen de midden- en rechterrijstrook): change:lanes=yes|not_right|no 

MVG
eggie
syntex (2022-10-01 12:32:51+00:00): Jeżeli pasy nie są fizycznie rozdzielone nie dzielimy dróg na takie fragmenty!!
BartekChom (2022-10-01 22:40:02+00:00): Mówisz, że zakreskowany obszar to nie powód do rozdzielenia pasów? Sporo tak rozdzielałem. Mam to odkręcić?

Poza tym sklejałem, zwłaszcza Samochodową, ale mogę się zgodzić, że za mało. Skleić odcinek Domaniewskiej na zachód? Skleić środek skrzyżowania Domaniewskiej i Rodziny Hiszpańskich?

Za to Magazynową przy skrzyżowaniu z Domaniewską i domaniewską w północno-wschodniej ćwiartce skrzyżowania z Wołoską chętnie bym rozdzielił. Zakazujesz?
syntex (2022-10-01 23:11:41+00:00): Nie, zamalowany obszar nie jest wystarczający do rozdzielania pasów. Jeśli byłby tutaj słupek lub coś innego fizycznie oddzielającego pasy to wtedy tak. I Magazynowa również nie ma takiego słupka, więc nie jest rozdzielona. Rodzinę Hiszpańskich bym zostawił jak jest. Domaniewska również jest w większości fizycznie rozdzielona.
BartekChom (2022-10-01 23:47:42+00:00): Dobrze, odkręcę zamalowane obszary, o których pamiętam, ale teraz muszę w końcu iść spać. Z tym, że Domaniewska i tak miejscami jest pojedyncza, a miejscami podwójna, a skoro zamalowany obszar nie wystarczy, to linia ciągła chyba tym bardziej nie. Czy mówisz, że jeżeli już jest wyspa, to rozdzielamy wszystko z zamalowanym i linią ciągłą?
user_3022894 (2023-05-19 13:00:50+00:00): Hallo Olaf,

Adressen zusätzlich am POI zu taggen, ist ok.

Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5424456956/history

(du hattest dort die Adresse entfernt).

Adressen von POI bitte nicht löschen, sofern sie nicht falsch sind.

Es handelt sich nicht um falsche Duplikate. Das sind hier wieder die zwei Varianten, die es in OSM gibt. Nicht jede/r taggt Adressen an POI, wo das Gebäude bereits die Adresse trägt. Das muss man auch nicht. Trotzdem ist auch die Vorgehensweise mit den zwei Adressangaben legitim.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Filip009 (2022-11-27 12:11:08+00:00): Dobrý deň, telefónne čísla sa uvádzajú vo formáte +421 XXX XXX XXX
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10062567035/history
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:38:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800230
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:36:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You mapped a wall as being a path . 
Your mapping of buildings are accurate.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800269
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-16 13:27:14+00:00): Hello!

Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575895339/history has surface=timber and nor more standard surface=wood?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface for listing of commonly used values
user_177389 (2022-09-29 22:44:48+00:00): Wrong comment. I corrected the admin_centre.
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:33:08+00:00): Hello again. See my comments on changeset 126800703. They are also valid here.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800467