piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Casey_boy (2019-03-14 16:50:53+00:00): To reiterate gurglypipe's comments, thanks for mapping these - though I also agree they should be tagged a buildings rather than areas.

However, I don't think apartments is the correct tag. These are shared accomodation blocks - with communial living areas (lounge, kitchen, and bathrooms). Only bedrooms are lockable. Also, it seems the "student_accomodation" scheme is abandoned. 

I would suggest you retag as "building=residentail + residential=university". This would also bring these buildings (back) in line with the rest of campus.
Casey_boy (2019-03-28 11:12:43+00:00): I've made some changes to these accomodation blocks in edits #68620528, #68620739 and #68621022. I removed the landuse tags and instead split the underlying buildings into seperate buildings. I standardised the size of the buildings and kept with the "building=residentail + residential=university" scheme that is common at Lancaster. I also moved the building names into the address fields as gurglypipe suggested. Cheers.
gurglypipe (2019-03-28 11:17:28+00:00): 🥳
Tallguy (2019-03-14 23:50:43+00:00): Hi gla-gis.  Glad to see you've made a start, but I think you need to have a read of this page  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water which should help you with the tags you will need. Hashtags doesn't actually exist as a 'tag' in OSM.
gla-gis (2019-03-15 00:52:17+00:00): thanks, i've edited the place, adding the bottle=yes tag according to the guide
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-14 08:29:30+00:00): Hi apm-wa, why the school has layer=-1 ?
Alex
apm-wa (2019-03-14 16:34:06+00:00): Hi, Alex. The default level is 0 so buildings drawn on the school grounds will appear above the ground in the standard layer if the grounds themselves are set at -1.  Otherwise in the standard layer the buildings may disappear under the grounds.
viloan (2019-03-13 00:26:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mapman44 (2019-05-24 05:39:10+00:00): Of course it isn't a restaurant. Sorry for the errant comment
Casey_boy (2019-03-29 11:04:14+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to include the builing block names into OSM. Based on your edits, I made a few changes to these blocks in changsets #68633696 and #68660271. 

You had created individual buildings for the blocks which were laid on top of main "Bowland Hall" building. This meant we had multiple buildings located on top of each other. Instead, I created a multipolygon of each individual block and named the multipolygon "Bowland Hall". 

Additionally, I added addr:housename tags to the entrance locations you provided so that the names of the blocks would show up on the map.

Cheers.
rvidotto (2019-03-13 00:41:19+00:00): Pedi revisao, mas apenas cliquei no caixa errada...
santamariense (2019-04-27 05:02:53+00:00): Uma vez que tu tenhas resolvido a dúvida quanto a localização da rodoviária, tu podes excluir a tag fixme dela, já que era exatamente isso que ela pedia, "Averiguar local correto". https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5874013264
Excelente edição!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-13 03:46:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

What kind of garden is Sophie's Garden? Is it private?
santamariense (2019-03-13 13:43:37+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OSM. Estava certo como tu tinha mapeado antes. Se esse for o nome pelo qual são conhecidos, sim está certo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68082992
muralito (2019-03-14 01:31:11+00:00): Hola Fede.

Las lineas que borraste eran de interpolacion de direcciones. Podria no estar bien la numeracion, pero no las llamaría "innecesarias".

Por favor asegurate que estuvo bien borrarlas.
Ignacio Gabriel Vassallo (2019-03-14 18:11:43+00:00): muralito, pero las lineas no tienen etiqueta ni ningun identificador, por lo tanto era imposible que era un trabajo a medio hacer de interpolacion de direcciones.
Si prefieres dejamos de borrarlas, pero de momento, no tienen ninguna informacion util, ni estan terminadas. faltan definiciones para que los numeros de casas aparescan
muralito (2019-03-15 13:57:07+00:00): Hola Ignacio. 

No me quedo claro porque decis que era a medio hacer,
Las lineas dicen que son de interpolación 
con addr:inclusion=actual addr:interpolation=even

y las alturas en estos casos estan en los nodos de los extremos.

Ver por ejemplo 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3548482708/history
o
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348787153/history

O si revisas en el mapa web las lineas que aun quedan, vas a ver la linea punteada con numeros en ambos extremos.

Volvi a chequear algunas lineas borradas y las lineas son de interpolacion. Como dije en el primer comentario, si la numeracionde las alturas esta bien, no hay que borrarlas.

Para que aparezca cada numero de casa, hay que relevar y mapear cada uno individualmente, por eso es que mientras ese trabajo no está completo (es un esfuerzo muy grande), se mapean la lineas de interpolacion, que con un trabajo mucho menor, igual permite una aproximacion a la ubicacion real.

Yo solo las borraria si se carga la numeración exacta de cada puerta, pero creo que en la comunidad argentina se prefiere que, aunque este cada numero de puerta mapeado individualmente,  tambien esten las lineas de interpolacion.

Como Fede es un usuario con pocas ediciones, supuse que podria haber alguna confusion, por eso puse el comentario para llamar la atencion.
Ignacio Gabriel Vassallo (2019-03-15 14:03:34+00:00): Ok, entonces no las tocamos. al ver que estaban incompletas, pense que habian dejado a medio hacer de forma definitiva. si es posible despues agrego las que borre por mi parte. Cualquier cambio que veas de fede, martin, beachepe, o mio es del mismo grupo. si ves que estamos marcando algo mal, o algun otro tema, podes mandarme a vassallo1994@gmail.com
muralito (2019-03-15 15:01:35+00:00): Revertir completamente un cambios es facil, pero se perderia todo lo hacho en el cambio y no solo la recuperacion de las lineas de interpolacion.

Puede ser algo mas complicado si siguen modificando cosas y hay muchos mas pasos a revertir. Si podes comunicale al grupo que no modifique elementos existentes por ahora hasta recuperar las lineas. Agregar cosas nuevas no hay problema, no complica le trabajo. Dame unos dias para verlo.
user_5359 (2019-03-19 20:46:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
JJIglesias (2019-03-13 05:21:53+00:00): Slds. Por que borraste la Poblacion de Yupampa Valencia?
JJIglesias (2019-03-13 05:23:09+00:00): Esa poblacion esta oficialmente alli de acuerdo con el Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas (INE) y el Instituto Geografico Militar (IGM)
Ale Mercado Ortiz (2019-03-13 20:19:57+00:00): No modifique nada de ese sector
acabo de revisar y Yupampa Valencia esta como estaba antes
JJIglesias (2019-03-13 20:22:48+00:00): Saludos en el trace de tu edicion Borraste Yupampa Valencia, lo q ves ahora es porque yo lo volvi a crear otra vez, sin revertir toda tu edicion. A veces sin querer borramos cosas q son vitales para el mapa, antes de salvar por favor revisa que no hayas borrado nada.
Slds
mikr2019 (2019-03-13 02:30:53+00:00): 06:00-22:00
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-03-13 10:43:11+00:00): Halo, way/674855294 dari changeset/67828950 kenapa dihapus?
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-03-14 02:51:50+00:00): Solved
Silvia IRM-ED (2019-03-14 03:20:40+00:00): jalan tidak jelas dan tidak ada keterangan sumbernya (gps, survei, dll)
freebeer (2019-09-03 00:12:41+00:00): hallo,
when you made this edit, you added tohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172853152 , a residential road, the tag of `al=1'.

might it be you meant to add `la(nes)', or something completely different?

thanks
BobGod (2019-09-03 23:18:36+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will delete this information as it seems to not pertain to any data of ours. 
Thanks again
jonesophie (2019-03-13 08:50:19+00:00): Getting problem in Lexmark printer, dial Lexmark technical support number 1888-315-9712 and fix the issues. They have different types of tools for repairing printers. Call anytime Lexmark Printer Support and repair the issues.
http://printer-help-number.com/lexmark-printer-support.html
5m4u9 (2019-03-13 13:04:56+00:00): hola, solo comentar que las paradas de salida y llegada están siendo mapeadas como paradas...
//
las paradas de salida y llegada deben ser terminales de buses... amenity=bus_station
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:10:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:21:39+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Minh Nguyen (2019-10-28 05:28:27+00:00): The article was right. This is the Brotherhood Building; changeset 3410538 incorrectly gave that name to a building one block to the east, which is now demolished. Fixed in changeset 76282505.
Arlo James Barnes (2019-10-29 23:01:27+00:00): Thanks for setting me straight!
Allison P (2019-03-13 04:57:20+00:00): "Fixes" I can't figure out how to fix the island. For some reason when I try to add it to the riverbank relation the river only displays as a way instead of an area.
user_5359 (2019-03-17 16:26:24+00:00): Hello, please have a look on the buildings with "#5E564C"="darkgrey" (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/H5l). Is this the roof:colour or the building:color?
freebeer (2019-10-18 22:16:49+00:00): sorry, you can't add an area (recreation ground) tagging to an item that is a way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543977804/history
Litawor (2019-03-13 16:14:02+00:00): Labas,
Matomai kažkas parodo klaidą, kai pamirštu įjungti į ploto ryšį vidinį plotą? 
Ar tai Keepright?

Litawor.
Tomas Straupis (2019-03-14 10:49:29+00:00): Mūsų vietinis Lietuvos patrulis turi kiekvieną dieną prasukamas QA taisykles.
anu_smita (2019-07-09 07:26:30+00:00): "Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across these ways between

"node 5100469384
node 5169049326"

 classified as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-07-09 07:47:10+00:00): Hello anu_smita!

I already check those nodes. It is make sense, but I suggest to change it into tertiary, please check level street imagery there. Let me know any ideas from you guys.

Happy mapping!
Glassman (2019-03-13 16:02:50+00:00): I think you may have created a rendering problem. The platform is tagged as layer=1, since the road is now layer=0, it will be rendered below the platform and not visible. Can you fix that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68088470
melitele (2019-03-13 16:11:14+00:00): I missed that, sorry. I've restored the layer back to 1.
camelCaseNick (2020-01-30 22:58:14+00:00): Hey,
ich denke, der hier für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676471780#map=19/49.70684/8.32063 angegeben Wikipedia-Artikel ist wohl nicht ganz richtig.
Evtl. sollte es sich um "wikipedia=de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Osthofen#Leckzapfen" handeln?
CamelCaseNick
PT-53 (2019-09-22 17:10:10+00:00): Hallo MaAdler,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die Auffahrt auf die A6 aus Richtung Nordwest mit dieswer Abbiegebeschränkung 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9392854/history
gesperrt.
Wie weit ist denn die Baumaßnahme?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-25 06:30:26+00:00): Hallo MaAdler, 
danke für Deine Rückmeldung und die angekündigte Überprüfung nach Rückkehr.
Grüße
mueschel (2019-03-22 10:19:56+00:00): Hallo,
du solltest hier noch ein paar Infos geben, was du genau taggen willst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6334899605

Gruß
Jan
Lokai (2021-04-09 10:42:34+00:00): Erledigt
zvenzzon (2019-03-25 13:18:23+00:00): Please check the noname=Wernsbach tag on way 676474087. It should probably be name=Wernsbach 

With regards, zvenzzon
osmviborg (2019-03-13 07:34:21+00:00): Bygninger indenfor bygninger, er en fejl.
Hjart (2019-03-13 07:43:59+00:00): Ikke længere. Jeg har rettet yderligere. Se iøvrigt mine kommentarer til archies ændringer i aftes
archie (2019-03-13 08:11:38+00:00): Hvorfor taggar du hele byggningen med leisure=sports_hall? Där finns ju även Gram bibliotek. Är det sport som utövas i biblioteket? De enskilda sporthallarna är jag med på, men taggningen av hela byggningen; där bör det inte finnas med leisure=sports_hall och sport=multi enligt min mening. Hade du gjort så på t ex en theater så hade du fått ett felmeddelande (theater inside theater). Här er det inte byggninger indenfor byggninger utan leisure=sports_hall indenfor leisure=sports_hall. Jag tvivlar att detta er ret.
osmviborg (2019-03-13 08:28:30+00:00): Den ydre bygning bør tagges 'building=sports_centre'
Hjart (2019-03-13 08:56:32+00:00): Bygningen som sådan er primært et idrætscenter og derfor tagger jeg den som sådan, selvom der er et cafeteria og biblioteket nu også har fået plads i et hjørne.
Der er en f* masse gråzoner overalt, som man nogen gange bare er nødt til at se lidt stort på.
archie (2019-03-13 08:57:02+00:00): osmviborg: jag håller helt med dig om det inte hade varit för Gram bibliotek som ligger i samme bygning. Hvad gör i så?
Hjart (2019-03-13 08:59:50+00:00): "Idrætscenter" omfatter iøvrigt også udearealer, så det kan ofte være misvisende at tagge bygninger som sådan
archie (2019-03-13 09:00:15+00:00): Hjart: din kommentar kom samtidigt som min. Men hvis det är sådan, så syns jeg som osmviborg: building=sports_centre, eller hellre building=sports_hall.
fmarier (2019-03-13 16:11:01+00:00): Sadly, Starlit Citadel is now permanently closed: https://web.archive.org/web/20190126152548/https://www.starlitcitadel.com/games/blog/

I have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68105487
abrensch (2019-11-11 22:05:08+00:00): Hallo  MaAdler,

hat sich die SPerrung der St 2223 erledigt?

Der oben verlinkte Artikel sagt 31.10.2019

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
MaAdler (2019-11-12 18:05:46+00:00): Alle Fahrrichtungen mit Ausnahme von Georgensgmünd Richtung Nürnberg sind freigegeben.
osmviborg (2019-03-13 07:39:29+00:00): Bygninger indenfor bygninger.
Hjart (2019-03-13 07:42:36+00:00): Ikke længere. jeg har rettet yderligere
fmarier (2019-03-13 16:14:16+00:00): I've started to change all of the breweries in BC to be in line with this guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BC_Craft_Breweries#Tagging_guidance

Basically, it seems like the best thing to do, as far as I got from the discussion with more experienced mappers than me, is to tag the building as a brewery and then put a node in the area of the building that's used as a tasting room / bar.
keithonearth (2019-03-13 17:47:28+00:00): Huh. To me that feels like mapping one thing twice. Tasting rooms and breweries are not the same thing, but they are still part of the same establishment.

But I respect your judgement, if you'd rather tag the outline as the brewery and add a node for the tasting room, I'll let them be.
fmarier (2019-03-13 18:03:25+00:00): The problem I found is that some of them are breweries, pubs and alcohol stores. Often these different activities are in different parts of the buildings, though not always. When they were part of the same node / way, then it was pretty random which would get picked by different renderers, making the data a lot less useful.

If you have a better idea on how to do this, I'm all ears. I'd just like to make sure that it's consistent across BC, which is why I started that wiki page and went through all of the local ones.
keithonearth (2019-03-13 18:21:39+00:00): Yeah, you make valid point.
fmarier (2019-03-15 05:56:54+00:00): I've restored the split bars/shops and breweries in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68162124.
keithonearth (2019-03-15 16:45:02+00:00): Alright. Thanks. I started to do that, but was finding it more of a headache to figure out how it had been tagged than I expected. Then I procrastinated.
JochenOSM (2019-03-13 20:15:27+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du denn den Reifen Umert gelöscht?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68090583
simbl (2019-03-15 16:29:23+00:00): Hallo Jochen, der Reifen Umert ist geschlossen, der hat leider in Nord schon vor einiger Zeit zugemacht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68090583
JochenOSM (2019-03-15 16:54:56+00:00): Hatte ich gar nicht mitbekommen, danke für deine Änderung.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68090583
DemoLogin (2019-03-19 09:53:54+00:00): Это изменение будет отменено в ближайшее время.
DemoLogin (2019-03-20 21:23:35+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68353698
se7entime (2019-03-19 04:50:55+00:00): maaf sebelumnya, kalau boleh tau, dibagian "nama" kenapa dikasih nama "C" semua mas ini rumah2nya?
Farras (2019-03-26 10:03:43+00:00): Ya. Seharusnya rumah tidak diberi nama, melainkan nomor rumah. Kalau pun ada namanya, tagnya addr:housename (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr).

Silakan dihapus. Terima kasih.
Baconcrisp (2019-09-12 21:03:20+00:00): Hello Vi Dinh,

I came across this way(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189017068) while I was editing and I wanted to know how you confirmed it was a bi-directional way instead of a oneway? Based on the traffic and signs I was able to see it appears to be a oneway. Any insight you can give me on this is appreciated!

Sincerely,
Baconcrisp
GrabVNTommy (2019-09-13 03:36:45+00:00): Hi Baconcrisp,

This way is a bi directional way because people can turn left or turn right to start going from their home on this way.

Best regards,
Vi Dinh.
Baconcrisp (2019-09-13 13:53:32+00:00): That makes sense. Thank for clarifying that for me!

Baconcrisp
mavl (2019-03-13 17:22:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этой линией была обозначена тропинка, а не проезд.
GeoidDude (2019-03-22 22:52:33+00:00): Hello olehz, was this bridge over Опір not correctly modeled as a dual-carriageway? A painted barrier is visible in Bing and Esri images, and a physical barrier is visible in both Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.10964794195&lng=23.5957776517&z=17&pKey=GuxTWku5buMyZrNBu0LBYg&focus=photo) and OpenStreetCam (https://openstreetcam.org/details/1276687/2804/track-info).
olehz (2019-03-25 11:12:54+00:00): Hi, GeoidDude. I see no reason to divide the bridge into two separate ones just because there are 10 cm height constructions between lanes. Our road pits are much bigger obstacles. So this is unnecessary complexity. We do not break apart every road only because someone has installed a block. If you really want to do micromapping, draw roads like ares + separate fences
Duja (2019-03-13 21:58:40+00:00): @sivanovic: ne treba ovako. Za Srbiju se ne koriste nivoi 9 i 10, vidi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
Kao rezultat, Nominatim pokazuje da grad Vrbas ima "village boundaries"
Duja (2019-03-13 22:05:06+00:00): Biće da je Pedja upravo izmenio tu stranicu bez dogovora (a da ja znam za njega). 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Admin_level_10
sivanovic (2019-03-13 22:10:50+00:00): Ево дискусије овде:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56153
Duja (2019-03-13 22:15:51+00:00): A jbg, ne dešava se ništa na forumu 3 godine i onda na brzaka okrenete sve naglavačke. Kako "nije puno izmena" kad ima nekoliko hiljada sela koje sad treba downgradeovati bez preke potrebe???
sivanovic (2019-03-13 22:16:59+00:00): Istina, moja greška u prekom editovanju.
Duja (2019-03-13 22:27:02+00:00): Odgovorio sam na forumu, dogovorićemo se valjda tamo. Ovo ćemo lako vratiti ako treba. Poyy. ;)
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:34+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:35+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:36+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:37+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:38+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:39+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:40+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:41+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:42+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:43+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648
Tested123 (2019-03-13 09:30:44+00:00): testedtestedtested
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68092648