stevea (2019-07-01 17:44:26+00:00): park:type is a wiki ( https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:park:type ) Adamant1 himself started, about which HE made contributions to in a table IN that wiki showing, at least initially, that he made some good-faith efforts to reach better consensus to facilitate deprecating the tag.  Then, after horrific behavior (petty complaints about wiki syntax, adding contradictory and nonsensical statements to the Page, deleting  / censoring / obscuring his bad words and acts into an Archive, introducing the further confusion of his own mistakes and misunderstanding of what was intended to be a helpful concept / talking point, trying to shut down the conversation by stating "more discussion and explanation would convolute things needlessly"...and more!) Adam spectacularly failed to respond well to the (v1 or, after his mess, v2) proposal to go about this in a conciliatory, community-oriented, open fashion so that we may be (politely) systematic in how we deprecate this tag.

Moreover, MULTIPLE TIMES (in the Talk page of that wiki) Adam HIMSELF said "I'm done" (with the process of contributing to efforts to deprecate / systematically remove this tag).

Yet, here, Adam blithely removes the tag (as he did in other changesets in the same day, all tracking my recent edits), doing an end-run around HIS OWN declaration that he is "done" with fixing, correcting or even discussing what is to be done with this flavor of tagging (park:type).  He even says why in his changeset comment, for which I offer him thanks, even as I am not thankful for Adam's antagonistic and self-contradictory behavior as he distinctly harasses me.

I don't believe Adam's deletion of park:type tags is a way forward.  I ask that if Adam is a man of his word, that he KEEP his word and actually BE "done" with anything having to do with this tag (by his own declaration, and more than once):  no more contributions to the park:type wiki (or its Talk page), no more edits having to do with park:type.  Adam himself said he would do this, doing a Very Fine Job of uninviting himself from these contributions, then a few days later makes an edit like this, contradicting himself and violating his word that he is "done."  I find these actions on a spectrum of unwelcome to downright hostile toward OSM and its tenet of good behavior.

Adam, to be clear:  please make no further edits to park:type tags, just as you said you wouldn't in the wiki you started (then fouled with your atrocious behavior).  The v2 proposal there and other structured "park" and "public lands" tagging (e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_States_Public_Lands#State_Public_Lands ) are well underway with multiple Contributors, grow nicely in directions of community consensus, data research, collaboration and resulting improvements in the map.  We have grown from one to three states there in the last week and there is discussion of another Contributor soon adding a fourth.

As Adam has stated multiple times "I'm not going to be involved in it. That's for sure" about participating in these improvements in our map's (park) data, I ask simply that Adam be a man of his word and not make edits like this (see also changesets 71745756, 71745750, 71745746, 71745712), undermining his very own words he would not do so.  It is transparent to me that Adam tracking my edits and removing tags I have purposefully left in the map because there is an ongoing Discussion in a wiki (again, which Adam himself started) is disingenuous, antagonistic behavior which Adam seems unable to resist even after he has said "I'm done" and "I'm not going to be involved" (in park tagging, park:type tagging or related activity).

Perhaps sticking to fence lines and "adding stuff" is more Adam's kind of mapping.