piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2021-11-10 00:50:26+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding more businesses to OSM and sharing your knowledge.

We saw you mentioned "Google" as part of the source you use to bring data to OSM in your last edits.

If you mean that you use their search engine to look up the website of a business, and then use the data from the business’s website, that is generally fine.

However, as you probably know, we _never_ copy data from Google Maps or Google Street View into OSM, that is illegal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Happy mapping!  :-)
zazablue (2021-11-10 06:39:51+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
Thank you for your pertinent comment. I should not have cited Google as a source as it is a means by which to access the company website and social media accounts,  not an actual source. I will be more conscientious going forward. Cheers!
pitfire (2021-12-13 12:19:22+00:00): Hallo Zrop,
die Parkanlage "440656418, v8"
hat einen Konflikt zwischen Merkmalen: leisure, natural.
4Jahre alt 
Ich denke wir sollten das Gras mal mähen. :-)
Zrop (2021-12-13 12:41:16+00:00): Hi pitfire,
dann pack den Rasenmäher mal aus :-)
archpdx (2021-11-10 00:20:47+00:00): Hi,
It looks like this parking lot was tagged as area=yes instead of amenity=parking so I fixed this
user_389895 (2021-11-11 19:55:42+00:00): Hi, and thank you!
ravali_78 (2021-11-10 07:48:30+00:00): Hi Tea and Biscuits
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with node 9239801778, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113596072.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113580206
calli3756 (2021-11-10 08:18:07+00:00): Guten Morgen Geofreund1,
kannst Du noch einmal schauen? Die Ergänzten Häuser sind letztes Jahr für das Neubauprojekt 6-Seen Wedau abgerissen worden. Danke und schönen Gruß
Geofreund1 (2021-11-10 09:01:35+00:00): Betrifft das alle Häuser in dem Schrebergartengebiet? Gilt das auch für die Wege in dem Gebiet?

Es ist von Vorteil, wenn Ortskundige in solchen Fällen eine Note platzieren oder Gebäude mit "demolished" kennzeichen. Dann fällt der nächste Mapper, der sich auf Luftbilder verlässt, nicht auf überholte Aufnahmen herein.
Geofreund1 (2021-11-17 13:12:17+00:00): Hallo calli3756, meine Frage ist noch offen ;)
calli3756 (2021-11-17 16:08:45+00:00): Sorry. Ja, das betrifft auch die Wege. Alles zwischen den Masurenallee und dem Bahngelände.
Geofreund1 (2021-11-17 19:50:13+00:00): Alles weg
ivanbranco (2021-11-09 20:23:36+00:00): Comincio a pensare tu lo faccia apposta. Ti è stato spiegato nemmeno due ore fa da un altro utente che gli indirizzi si mappano come nodi, e che senza civico sono pure inutili (qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113479578) e puntualmente lo rifai (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886028269)

Lo stesso utente ti ha chiesto perché modifichi i nomi dei comuni da "x" a "Comune di x" (qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113544151), lo ignori e continui a farlo ora con Arese. Sei letteralmente l'unica persona in tutta Italia a farlo, puoi vederlo da te: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cRR
user_10901495 (2021-11-09 20:52:56+00:00): Riferito alla seconda parte:
Ma non avevo ancora visto il commento di Alecs01. 
Effettivamente la mia idea di inserire i nomi come Comune di è opinabile, probabilmente rimedierò.

Risposta alla prima parte:
Seconda cosa mi sono stufato.
Non esiste che dato che una persona (o 2 o 1000) non è d'accordo con una cosa che faccio allora io non si sa per quale motivo ho automaticamente torto.
Oltretutto questa è una cosa estremamente noiosa, perché non è possibile che per andarmi contro si usi solo quest'argomentazione.
Vorrei almeno vedere dei modi più utili di muovere critiche.
Ho scritto qual'è l'utilità degli indirizzi su certe aree.
Io incomincio a pensare che lo facciate apposta a non leggere le cose che scrivo e a controargomentare di conseguenza con le vostre opinioni.
ivanbranco (2021-11-09 21:29:07+00:00): Martino, stufati pure. Io mi sono stufato. La persona (o 2 o 1000) più che metterti a conoscenza degli standard della community italiana cosa deve fare? Meno vittimismo per piacere.

Cito dalla Wiki: "Dato che il numero civico contraddistingue un accesso esterno che immette alle unità immobiliari, le informazioni sugli indirizzi possono essere aggiunte solo come semplice nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso esterno o, in alternativa, a un nodo di ingresso di un edificio o sito. NON bisogna aggiungere le informazioni di indirizzo a edifici, siti o altre tipologie di aree."

Dalla Wiki, repetita iuvant: "NON bisogna aggiungere le informazioni di indirizzo a edifici, siti o altre tipologie di aree." Cosa non è chiaro?

Inoltre: "Nel tag addr:housenumber=* dovrà essere inserito il numero civico". Nel caso da me linkato (oltre a essere su un'area) non c'è nemmeno quello. Così come nel caso che ti ha sollevato Alecs01 nell'altro changeset.

E' scritto nero su bianco. Non è che non siamo d'accordo, è che la community ha delle regole. E' una regola che rispettiamo tutti. Tu continui a fare di testa tua.

"probabilmente rimedierò." Sarebbe meglio evitare di caricare ulteriori changeset prima di aver corretto gli errori precedenti.
neuhausr (2021-11-09 21:21:51+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and congrats on changeset #1! For situations like this where there are two different points of interest within one building, it's common to create two nodes within the building, one for the restaurant and one for the grocery store. Hope this makes sense. Thanks again for contributing and happy mapping!
Msaynevirta (2021-12-19 12:02:05+00:00): Hi, this changeset decreased the accuracy considerably from the previous manually traced version. The same issue is with multiple other Porkkala islands, e.g. Mossasskärsgrundet. Before making these systematic changes, I would ask you to review the previous information in more detail.
posiki (2021-12-19 18:08:47+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset. I have done updates manually and I have tried to check that quality of source data will be better than older version. It seems I have made some mistakes. Sorry. P
jmty8 (2021-11-15 12:18:15+00:00): Hello, where I can get the information about this junction? https://sites.mapbox.com/id-internal/#background=fr.ign.bdortho&disable_features=boundaries&feedback_id=crossinghighways-461237072-609987484&id=w1000897240&map=19.87/49.54536/0.39381
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113580909
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2021-11-16 19:38:53+00:00): https://www.paris-normandie.fr/id194787/article/2021-05-21/les-travaux-de-securisation-de-la-rd-6015-sont-en-cours-dachevement-en-caux
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113580909
joost schouppe (2022-06-28 11:40:17+00:00): Hey, you forgot to define this way as a roundabout 1000897246. I've added it just now.
smootheFiets (2021-12-04 09:55:40+00:00): Hoi padvinder,

Hier ontbrak een stuk natural=water ten zuiden van de J. Noppenlaan. Ik heb het net aangepast nadat een lokale mapper me erop had geattendeerd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114548850
Hij dacht dat ik tijdens BAG-onderhoud aan de landuse had gezeten, en ik geloofde dat (gebeurd wel soms). Pas later kwam ik dit CS van jou tegen.

Mijn enige bron was PDOK. Ik hoop ik heb niks stuk gemaakt wat jij met eigen ogen beter hebt gezien.

Groeten,
smootheFiets
smootheFiets (2021-12-04 09:57:51+00:00): PS: deze highway=service. Als hij echt bestaat (zal wel), moet hij doorgetrokken worden naar de primary, toch? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977797695
padvinder (2021-12-05 22:47:13+00:00): Mooi als je mogelijkheden tot verbetering ziet. En prima om dan je wijzigingen door te voeren. Het is daar allemaal vrij nieuw of nog in ontwikkeling. dus die seviceroad...  waarschijnlijk iets tijdelijks. Ik haal hem maar weg. Een aansluiting op de Cruquiusweg lijkt me niet slim om te mappen.
pitfire (2021-11-10 06:44:01+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
woher stammt die Information, dass es sich bei (Weg: 1000898941) um ein "building 	greenhouse" handelt?
Gruß pitfire
Geofreund1 (2021-11-10 09:06:30+00:00): Du hast natürlich Recht: hatte vorher einige Gewächshäuser als greenhouse eingetragen. JOSM merkt sich sowas und ergänzt dann beim Tastenkürzel "g" auf greenhouse anstatt garage wie normalerweise. :(
Ist schon geändert.
Danke
wkdgs (2021-11-19 09:05:38+00:00): Hi,

mit deiner Löschung hast du auch die ganzen zusätzlichen Tags entfernt:

crossing=unmarked,
crossing:island=yes,
kerb=flush,
tactile_paving=no

Diese Informationen sind beim aktuellen Stand verloren. Und die Informationen wieder zu beschaffen ist bei OSM eine größere Hürde als sie überprüfen zu lassen.

Hast du die Kreuzung vor Ort gesehen? Dann müsstest du ja beantworten können, ob die Tags so passen, und die, die nicht passen, korrigieren können.

Falls du die Kreuzung nicht gesehen hast, würde ich empfehlen die Tags so wie sie waren zu übernehmen und ein fixme zu schreiben, dass um eine Überprüfung bittet. Zusätzlich kannst du auch einen Hinweis an die Stelle setzen, der nochmals um eine Überprüfung bittet.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113581308
wkdgs (2021-11-22 11:01:37+00:00): Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114093056
adrianojbr (2021-11-10 14:07:31+00:00): ProjetoMapeia, favor atentar para o alinhamento de vias, evitando usar somente imagens de satélite que contém distorções, comparando sempre que possível com outras fontes (OpenStreetMap GPS Traces, p. ex.). Essa página da wiki é bastantes esclarecedora sobre isso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Uso_de_Imagens#Erros_frequentes
Mannivu (2021-11-09 20:30:46+00:00): Sarebbe meglio separare civico/entrata dall'attività commerciale. Questo perché un domani l'attività potrebbe chiudere, ma il civico rimarrebbe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113581811
user_2066394 (2022-01-24 10:56:49+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=132119301
gnlpfth (2022-01-24 11:23:43+00:00): Danke, habs korrigiert. Aber warum du die Energie für die Schuldigensuche und dessen unmotivierte Anschrift nicht gleich in die Fehlerkorrektur investierst, ist mir ein Rätsel...
user_2066394 (2022-01-24 12:02:09+00:00): Hm. Du hast Attribute wie maxweight=* und surface=* ergänzt, wie soll ich die ergänzen? Auf dem way war nix
gnlpfth (2022-01-24 12:43:48+00:00): Was möchtest du mir sagen?
user_2066394 (2022-01-24 13:55:51+00:00): Ich habe keine Ahnung, was vor Ort maßgeblich ist. Also macht es Sinn, dass du es korrigierst.
mariotomo (2021-11-10 21:05:42+00:00): JJIglesias: I know you can do better, commenting your changesets, than "test" :-D
"added a gate and a billboard".
kabelhaai (2025-12-24 19:03:59+00:00): De naam dorpswoning is wat vreemd. Generieke naam die vaak wordt gebruikt op het erfgoed platform.
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:57:15+00:00): Hi skysawa2010, welcome to OSM.

same again, could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
syntex (2021-11-11 00:53:29+00:00): Wycofany/Reverted
freeExec (2021-11-17 07:35:44+00:00): Есть ли смысл множить одни и те же маршруты?
parukhin (2021-11-17 22:25:59+00:00): Если речь про 016, то он как минимум отличается ОП от 015.
freeExec (2021-11-18 07:08:08+00:00): А от 234?
archie (2021-11-09 23:05:14+00:00): area=yes samt eller rättare i en mp är kaka på kaka eller om du så vill, en tautologi.
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:56:49+00:00): Hi skysawa2010, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
syntex (2021-11-11 00:57:11+00:00): Wycofany/Reverted
JeroenHoek (2021-11-16 14:11:17+00:00): Hi Andre,

Je tekent hier ook weer duikers in als bruggen (bridge=yes). Zou je dat niet willen doen? Duikers zijn geen bruggen.
JeroenHoek (2021-11-16 07:44:45+00:00): Waarom? Die weg ontsluit het dorp.
Andre Engels (2021-11-18 19:45:03+00:00): Naar mijn mening verdient bij een plaats van dit formaat alleen de weg naar het dorp de vermelding tertiary, niet de weg door het dorp (als die niet ergens anders heenvoert). Maar ik zal het zo laten, geen zin hierover ruzie te maken.
Sandal man (2021-11-25 12:41:33+00:00): Hello, thanks for your adjustments to the osm but a highway type road is not correct.
I think in this case it must be type of service? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Regards Jan
Lewatoto (2022-07-12 22:29:45+00:00): Saludos, con una consulta, ¿cuál es el objetivo de estos elementos? si surge alguna duda de como mapear elementos en el grupo de OSM Guatemala en Telegram te podemos ayudar con eso.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-11-15 23:36:22+00:00): Hi Andrew,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your additions to the map.
The name tag should be reserved for actual names of things rather than descriptions. I have changed this bench from name=bench to amenity=bench as detailed here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
5m4u9 (2021-11-10 20:17:13+00:00): hola, qué respaldo hay para poner que no hay nombre? algunas calles de la zona tienen nombre...
seudodata (2021-11-11 04:51:27+00:00): Pues que he recorrido la calle entera y no había una sola placa que lo ponga y, preguntado el guardia, me dice que no tiene nombre. Puse los nombres de las que si había.
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:54:10+00:00): Hi The Sleepy Jo, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
iandees (2021-11-10 00:27:09+00:00): You deleted a couple buildings in this changeset. Were those buildings demolished or removed somehow?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113584647
user_10901495 (2021-11-13 10:26:11+00:00): I suggest adding the statuto comunale for every italian commune. You gave me the idea with this changeset. For start though the statuto comunale would be better in the Monrupino relation instead of the admin_centre.
MitjaJez (2021-11-13 14:03:14+00:00): You're right. I realise it when i submit and I didn't have time jet to correct.
And also admin center should be corrected with building instead od place.
Mannivu (2021-11-09 22:35:22+00:00): Motivo per cui hai tolto tag wikidata e nome dalla piazza?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113584958
user_10901495 (2021-11-10 22:44:02+00:00): Non ho tolto il tag wikidata e il nome dalla piazza.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 05:34:44+00:00): Negare l'evidenza: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/498046037
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:17:28+00:00): Avevo letteralmente trasferito i tag a un nodo. In che modo gli avrei "tolti"?
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:18:10+00:00): Negare l'evidenza cosa che lo sai benissimo quale fosse la manovra che avevo fatto.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 08:23:19+00:00): Se la piazza è già presente come area non ha senso duplicarla come nodo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:41:41+00:00): Non l'ho duplicata ripeto ho tolto nome e tag e li ho messi sul nodo. La piazza della Scala rimane una sola.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 08:46:14+00:00): OSM non funziona così, erano presenti un'area place=square che rappresentava piazza della scala (con o senza nome) e un nodo place=square. Ovviamente tra i due va tenuto l'elemento con maggior dettaglio, cioè l'area.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 08:59:00+00:00): Vedo che hai cancellato direttamente l'area e ripristinato il nodo. Poi continua a dire che il tuo non è vandalismo.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:59:13+00:00): No era presente solo l'area, che però era inaccurata. Nel mio ultimo changeset ho risolto eliminando l'area, dato che l'estensione è già indicata dalla pedestrian area. Quello sì è un doppione, avere sia il pedestrian che la square con la stessa estensione. La square come area dovrebbe includere anche la strada, una piazza non finisce quando finisce la sua area pedonale.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:00:03+00:00): Allora è vandalismo se le piace così tanto questa parola.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:00:46+00:00): Meno male che il mondo reale segue delle regole diverse e ogni parola ha un significatl preciso
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:02:55+00:00): Vandalism is the action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property. Io non sto distruggendo proprio un bel niente.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 09:03:42+00:00): Se l'area era innacurata il nodo lo sarà ancora di più. Potevi sistemarla (letteralmente bastava fare drag dei nodi per includere la strada) o aggiungere un fixme, in modo da preservarne la storia.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 09:04:24+00:00): Stai distruggendo il lavoro altrui, per esempio proprio la piazza che era mappata da 4 anni.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:11:06+00:00): Il "lavoro altrui" come se stessimo parlando di una cattedrale o della Casa Bianca. Cosa avrà richiesto, 30 secondi, creare questa piazza?
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-12 11:42:38+00:00): Hallo GoethesGarten,
warum hast Du die access Tags wieder eingetragen? Die sind definitiv nicht richtig!
Gruß Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-12 11:43:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914221733
user_185128 (2021-11-12 11:47:30+00:00): Dann mache du es doch bitte richtig. Ich bin sicher, dass es so richtig ist. Vorher stand dort, dass es korrigiert werden muss. Also mache es selbst oder lasse es so stehen bis es jemand so einträgt, dass keine Fehlermeldung erscheint.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-15 07:31:48+00:00): Hallo Moritzburg/GoethersGarten,

ich hatte das Tagging bereits korrigiert, nachdem ich im CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100551219 das vorher erläutert habe. Gerne investiere ich noch mehr meiner Freizeit dafür, Deine Fehler zu korrigieren.

Deine Art und Weise finde ich nicht besonders nett und kollegial. Auch, dass Du mit einem zweiten OSM Account antwortest ist schlechter Stil. Vor allem, weil den anderen Mitwirkenden gegenüber nicht transparent ist, dass die selbe Person dahinter steckt.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
wireguy (2021-11-09 22:10:31+00:00): Hi This, welcome to osm.   The house looks good, but would look better with squared corners.   Pressing Q key will sQuare the corners on the selected object.    Keep mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:43:15+00:00): Hi Gravedodger, welcome to OSM.

I think this new tagging is not correct. Why did you change the golf course mapping here to leisure? Thanks.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674024855

--
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Gravedodger (2021-11-10 07:41:51+00:00): Ah ... Apologies, that was a mistake on my part, I only meant to add new details to a Golf Course in Northern Ireland, I forgot I had been testing some settings elsewhere, thank you for catching that, I will be more careful, best regards Jim
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 07:52:28+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Can you revert the mentioned edit?
Gravedodger (2021-11-10 08:05:05+00:00): Yes, I have corrected my mistake and changed it back to a Tee Box. Best regards
jpennycook (2021-11-09 22:09:52+00:00): from surveys 29/10/2021, 02/12/2020, plus aerial imagery - Frimely, Deepcut, Mindenhurst area
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-15 11:06:48+00:00): Hallo GoethesGarten,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich auch beim Vorbeifahren gesehen. Ich platziere erstmal ein BurgerKing Node. Ohne aktuelle Luftbilder kann ich erstmal nicht mehr machen. Ich platziere auch noch ein OSM Hinweis. Die werden meiner Meinung nach mehr beachtet/gesehen.
Gruß Roger Wilco
archie (2021-11-09 23:00:35+00:00): Hej, vad gäller användandet av taggen name så gäller det regler. Ojbekten skall i första hand beskrivas utifrån vanliga taggar. Sedan skall bara etablerade namn användas. Du håller på att klistra på name-taggen på så tämligen allt som finns. Var vänlig läs noga igenom vad som gäller härvidlag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names. Tack!
archie (2021-11-09 23:08:40+00:00): Det här också: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
maraf24 (2022-02-27 19:17:09+00:00): Za to jest landuse=industrial.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 23:13:40+00:00): Hello again,
Can you please eplain why the previous change to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248764278 to this one was "vandalism"?  You've set the alt_name value to the alternative to what the "name" was, but how was the previous change vandalism?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group
michael60101 (2021-11-09 23:47:25+00:00): Apologies, my edit was incorrect. I meant to paste "Whakatāne" into the "name" box, but I accidentally pasted it into the "alt_name" box.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 23:59:23+00:00): Sigh.  And there was me thinking you were trying to find some sort of compromist.
For completeness, the other half of this discussion is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113586442 .  There I asked kiwiAs to stop behaving like a stroppy teenager and to apologise to you; it now looks like you're just as guilty as he is of prolonging this edit war.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 23:16:32+00:00): Hello again,
Can you please eplain why the previous change to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248764278 to this one was "edit warring"? You've set the alt_name value back to the same as the name, which makes no sense.
It appears that the previous editor has accepted your argument that "most signs say a not ā" but you've still reverted their change to alt_name.  I think that you owe them an apology.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group
user_9850906 (2021-11-09 23:27:54+00:00): This user "michael60634" has recently gone on an edit warring spree, continuing to mis-edit the "name" tag.  In this one particular, case, however, I was mistaken; his edit was to the "alt_name" tag.  I have since corrected this by correcting (yet again) the "name" tag, but also removing "alt_name", which is not needed.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 23:47:25+00:00): Hello again kiwiAs,
You were asked (by private message and in the changeset comment above) to apologise to michael60634 and have not, as far as I can tell, done so.
For the avoidance of doubt - http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248764278 shows that you have not, as you have said above, "corrected yet again the name tag", but have merely removed alt_name.
Sometimes people in OSM have different views about things - we need to discuss them like adults rather than sulking like stroppy teenagers and understand each others' point of view if the project is to avoid becoming full of pointless edit wars (and "a vs ā" is pretty high up the list of pointless edit wars).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group
user_9850906 (2021-11-09 23:52:36+00:00): Yes, I apologise to use "michael60634" for accidentally mischaracterising this one particular edit.  However, this pales in comparison to the number of apologies that he owes me for his recent behaviour (dozens of mis-edits to the "name" tag, on several nodes).