piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2021-04-17 06:15:35+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
I can see some more progess now but there are several errors left:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.70918&lat=-16.05247&zoom=17&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

These kind of errors are easy to detect, if you use the  JOSM validator.
Guido
joost schouppe (2022-01-22 12:04:10+00:00): The names are still in all caps and there are tags like "Shape_Area". Looks like an improper import to me...
*Martin* (2022-09-13 10:56:37+00:00): Are you sure this is valid? Place with area less than 1 cm2?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927788203#map=19/-16.06224/-68.71094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927788196
user_5359 (2021-05-22 05:50:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96277621: What is the meaning of the tag false=D?
syntex (2021-05-22 18:17:25+00:00): Idk, it is probably:
- my mistake
- error in the database from which I imported these buildings
-I copied the tag from the previous object.
Anyway, I fixed that.
gscholz (2021-04-12 05:02:05+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
your recent changesets have added a big amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.71091&lat=-16.05363&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
eggie (2021-04-08 16:58:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback Dit was je edit.
Je hebt het gebouw verwijderd.
Was dat de bedoeling?
Het beste kun je het restaurant op de bestaande adresnode bijtaggen.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-08 16:59:00+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102576767
eggie (2021-04-08 17:12:40+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld en de info op de adresnode geplaatst. 
gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SherbetS (2021-04-10 01:18:47+00:00): Hi, The correct tagging for the communication structure is man_made=mast + tower:type=communication
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-04-10 12:56:26+00:00): Thank You
praeteritum (2022-07-27 05:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124120974.
praeteritum (2022-07-27 05:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124120961.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
gscholz (2021-04-12 05:01:42+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
your recent changesets have added a big amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.71091&lat=-16.05363&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
ezekielf (2021-04-12 00:53:04+00:00): Looks good.  Since it looks like the road is mostly blocked off I went ahead an disconnected the streets.  I does look there is enough room for bicycles though so I added a little cycleway connection.  Feel free to adjust if you have better information!  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102760709
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102577668
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:30:26+00:00): Hi,

bei Telefonnummern bitte das internationale Format (also "+49 40 123....") nutzen.

Grüße
Hauke
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:32:26+00:00): Hi,

beim Zeichnen von Gebäuden etwas drauf achten, dass sich diese nicht überschneiden. Habs hier mal korrigiert.

Grüße
Hauke
ALu68 (2021-04-09 19:36:31+00:00): Hello Kuchum,

Can you please fix the name key.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235411350
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378431962

Thanks.
tguen (2021-04-20 04:29:02+00:00): Hello. I see you've been mapping a lot of sidewalks. I noticed a minor issue in a few places - you've connected sidewalks or crossings to a stop sign node instead of the crossing node. I know editors make it easy to snap ways to the wrong nodes by accident. Not a big deal and I've already fixed them, I just wanted to let you know so you can watch out for it in the future.
archpdx (2021-04-20 06:32:33+00:00): Hi tguen,
Thank you for informing me of this and fixing it. I'll make sure to check if I made errors like these in other areas, sorry about that.

Also, thank you for resolving some of the notes I've opened up recently!

-archpdx
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-08 19:20:09+00:00): Pakeičiau į planuojamą (highway=proposed), nes pagal oficialius duomenis ten yra Saulės gatvė.
Aurelijus Visagurskis (2021-04-09 08:39:27+00:00): Aišku. Ačiū
!bm (2021-04-10 08:40:17+00:00): s Anm / analog zu https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/102662889

auch hier etliche Fehler, korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102686617
Dawid2849 (2021-05-02 08:23:56+00:00): Cześć. Proszę, nie sklejaj landuse do drogi. Później trudno jest edytować w takim miejscu. Dodatkowo (przykładowo) trawa nie rośnie na drodze.
Negreheb (2021-05-12 18:39:26+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, ich hab gesehen, dass du hier eine Landuse-Lücke von Johann (beautifulplaces) bearbeitet hast. Die sind nicht so toll in OSM, das bitte nicht übernehmen, weil das wäre "Mapping für den Renderer" :) 
Da gabs schon öfter Diskussionen mit ihm, wo auch erklärt wurde, warum das nicht so toll ist und wie er das, was er erreichen möchte, erreichen kann. Leider war er da uneinsichtig. Wenn du willst, kann ich dir die Diskussionfäden zukommen lassen :)

Nur damit du dich nicht wunderst, ich hab hier mal angefangen Lücken auszubessern und werde mich wohl von Zeit zu Zeit daran machen, das weiter zu bearbeiten. 

Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-09 09:21:50+00:00): Olá, não classifique como terciária vias dentro de condomínio
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102580595
jmapb (2021-04-08 22:36:17+00:00): I was going to write to dlapo_lyft about this exact problem. I'm glad to see you agree. I imagine there are others mistagged out there as well.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
MKnight (2021-04-09 08:50:07+00:00): Moin,
ich habe Namen und Adresse vom Parkplatz wieder entfernt, schliesslich gibt es keinen.
VictorIE (2021-04-25 14:26:34+00:00): Hi,

In this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3271896#map=9/52.1874/-7.4789

There are several ways missing at this point:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927817741

I don't know how the issue was caused, but could you look at it?

Thanks
b-unicycling (2021-04-25 15:12:44+00:00): Hi, I downloaded the whole relation into JOSM and there was nothing missing, the members were just unsorted. If I was the cause earlier, it probably had to do with the DED creation, but of course not intentionally.
VictorIE (2021-04-25 16:04:25+00:00): Oh sure. A few people have edited it, so I'm not assigning blame. :)

Thank you for fixing it.
b-unicycling (2021-04-25 16:25:19+00:00): There are a few issues with river relations (I think), but I can't make head nor tail of why they look broken in iD.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-08 19:57:37+00:00): Palikau tik gatvės galus, nes oficialiai gatvė yra, įvažiavimai yra, tik nesusieina galai.
Aurelijus Visagurskis (2021-04-09 08:38:07+00:00): Taip ir yra. Ačiū
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
thopf (2021-04-08 19:17:27+00:00): Ist die Brücke über den Stiftingbach überhaupt noch begehbar? Vor ein paar Tagen wurde ein User-Hinweis abgegeben, dass man dort seit einiger Zeit nicht mehr aus dem Wald heraus kommt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2609428#map=17/47.08602/15.48099&layers=N
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:37:27+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier bei Große Twiete 3 und 3A separate Gebäude eingetragen. Das ist okay, aber da es in Realität ein zusammenhängendes Haus ist, müssen in OSM auch die beiden Polygone verbunden sein. Ansonsten suggeriert das ja, dass man zwischen 3 und 3A zwischendurch laufen kann (was ja in Realität nicht geht).
Hab die beiden mal angepasst.

Grüße
Hauke
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-26 10:46:17+00:00): So https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8181346145 is not a stile anymore?

Then stile tag should be removed
malcolmgc (2022-01-26 13:44:04+00:00): Done. Thanks for pointing this out. Yeah, stile replaced with a shiny new kissing gate.
literan (2021-04-09 16:43:50+00:00): зачем вы удалили ограничение "Только направо" с Реутовской на Кетчерскую? Там есть знак https://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=9&ll=37.83271529124963%2C55.74345492295567&pp=37.8327135%2C55.7434525&pa=505.2

Это можно расценивать как вандализм. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте существующие объекты
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Frans S (2021-04-24 12:31:30+00:00): Hallo Henk. Bedankt voor het mappen hier.
De bedoeling is dat de Image van het project gebruikt wordt. Helaas heb jij de maxar imagery gebruikt die een behoorlijke offset heeft.
Ik heb de meeste min of meer op de juiste plek gezet. Er missen nog wat gebouwen
Wil jij deze nog eens nalopen, mappen en op de juiste plaats zetten?
De image is nogal donker.
Je kunt de gamma wat aanpassen zodat alles wat lichter wordt.
Succes
!bm (2021-04-09 18:10:34+00:00): Hallo Der_Kartograf,

bitte Warnungen/Hinweise von iD (oder anderen Editoren/Analysetools) nicht blind übernehmen!

Beachte bitte OSM-Grundlagen – ganz allgemein[1] und im konkreten Fall die Richtlinien zu automatisierten und/oder Massen-Edits[2][3].

Das Tagging war hier auch an vielen Stellen nicht korrekt/sinnvoll.

Aus genannten Gründen revertiert in [4].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102662947

--besteGrüße!bm
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-08 20:20:44+00:00): Pridėtas barrier=yes neleis taku pravažiuoti jokiam transportui (įskaitant ir pėsčiomis). Tai pridėjau bicycle=yes, foot=yes, bet tai ant klaustuko, kiek maršrutizatorių šitą informaciją suvirškins. Gali būti, kad reikės iš viso nuimti šitą barjerą, nes, jei praeinama, tai toks čia ir barjeras :-)
NieWnen (2021-04-08 20:41:39+00:00): Ja bym w ogóle ten punkt usunął, bo nie widzę żadnego zastosowania w nim, korzystając z linka rozumiem, że to nawet nie jest żadna fizyczna brama, tylko tak nazwali projekt?

Jedyne z tego linka co wyczytałem, to to, że można dodać jakąś drogę, która jest zapewne zmapowana już od dawna, bo termin inwestycji to były lata 2011-2012
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102584004
C2oc4 (2021-04-09 04:53:58+00:00): No tak a jak są np jakieś wschodnia strefa ekonomiczna itp?
NieWnen (2021-04-09 13:56:57+00:00): Nie potrafię odpowiedzieć na to pytanie. Zapraszam na discorda/forum/fb.
C2oc4 (2021-04-10 06:06:45+00:00): Ja wzoruje się na tym co już jest dodane i patrzę np na 3 takie same obiekty
Frans S (2021-04-26 12:55:29+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping here/
Important. Use the image provides by the project. There is a big offset to maxar and Bing which you used.
Please tag buildings just as
building=yes. Also square each building you map before uploading
Best regards and keep mapping
starsep (2021-05-03 07:20:29+00:00): Hi, you added subway entrances near Rondo ONZ to Rondo Daszyńskiego relation, those are different subway stations.
Rondo Daszyńskiego is next: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1839856492

Not sure what's the purpose of Rondo relation, it's literally roundabout in Polish, you will many of those in central Warsaw
starsep (2021-05-03 07:21:11+00:00): *you will have many
Claudius Henrichs (2021-06-24 08:46:14+00:00): Thanks for fixing the name of the stop_area relation. I was only adding subway entrances, but didn't review correct station name.
Relation for Rondo ONZ:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7591677
Relation for Rondo Daszyńskiego:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7591678
Claudius Henrichs (2021-06-24 08:50:09+00:00): And to answer the question what the purpose of the stop_area relation is: It links all public transport stop infrastructure like stop position, platform, subway entrances, some times even ticketing systems to allow for routing.
I found the missing subway entrances via the Subway validator for Warsaw here: https://alexey-zakharenkov.github.io/subways/rapid/poland.html
...and you can see the yellow area connecting a stop area on the public transport map rendering here: http://öpnvkarte.de/#20.9993;52.2333;17
starsep (2021-06-24 08:56:36+00:00): Thanks for the answers! Your link is very helpful, I used http://osm-subway.maps.me but it hasn't been updated since December. I had plans to run it myself and publish it somewhere, good to know that there is up-to-date version available already.
praeteritum (2022-07-26 06:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124078137.
abakus_uploader (2021-04-08 22:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2021-04-25 10:27:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please tag buildings just as building=yes and square each rectangular building .
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-04-25 10:29:51+00:00): fyi, In rural areas paths are to be mapped just as highway=path.
Footways are more for urban areas, like parks.
Best regards
praeteritum (2022-07-25 04:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124030313.
praeteritum (2022-07-25 03:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124029985.
Cristoffs (2021-04-08 20:58:51+00:00): Cześć! W kilku miejscach nie połączyłeś dróg ze sobą (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/sp8trp?level=1) to zamierzone?
Tomasz Rmn (2021-04-09 15:20:03+00:00): Cześć. Podłączyłem już te drogi ze sobą. które faktycznie powinny być połączone z siecią dróg. Kilka z tych dróg początkowo nie podłączałem z siecią dróg, bo znajdują się na prywatnym terenie, ale dziś je podłączyłem i ustawiłem access=no
Kilka dróg musi zostać tak jak jest.
Cristoffs (2021-04-09 17:31:36+00:00): Super! Jeśli ustawiasz access=no nawigacje nie prowadzą.
sperlingskauz (2021-04-24 22:17:02+00:00): Hallo Baumpilz,
du hast den Tag highway = emergency_access_point für das Rettungsschild KA-1434 gelöscht!  DRK-Rettungsschilder dürfen nicht verändert werden, siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forstrettungsschilder_DRK_Karlsruhe. Bitte erfasse den Schaukasten als eigenes Objekt. 
Danke und Gruß, sperlingskauz
DD1GJ (2021-04-25 16:46:25+00:00): Rettungsunkt KA-1434 in Originalzustand versetzt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
user_5359 (2021-04-09 14:25:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
fgnievinski (2021-07-19 14:56:24+00:00): Hi. With regard to "removed a gate that didn't exist", I've restored it as historic=city_gate -- please let me know if anything is unclear. Thanks!
birdymaps (2021-07-19 15:31:31+00:00): Hello, thank you for your comment and for making this change!
fgnievinski (2021-07-19 19:00:16+00:00): I think this might be a wider issue, so I've proposed an expansion of historic=city_gate so as to include gate towers, too. Feel free to comment in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:historic%3Dcity_gate#Gate_towers.2C_too
Thanka!
trigpoint (2021-04-08 20:34:35+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927881965 and other buildings you have drawn are not single terraces, there are service ways passing between them so they should be split.

Cheers Phil
praeteritum (2022-07-25 03:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124029613.
syntex (2022-03-24 11:53:42+00:00): Dlaczego Kanał Zagoździański ma intermittent=yes?
conradoos (2022-03-24 12:48:04+00:00): Ja nie widziałem w nim wody. Byłem tam kilka razy i za każdym razem był suchy.
literan (2021-04-09 16:39:38+00:00): прямо с улицы эскалатор? однако...
augxcgrwxo (2021-04-09 18:08:33+00:00): тут не идеально нарисовано, если придираться, там 1/5 длины здания от входа проход, потом эскалатор в 2 полотна (1 вверх, один вниз).
Ludhiana (2021-04-10 15:00:36+00:00): Why are you harassing such a deserved mapper like bdiscoe?
user_5359 (2021-04-09 04:28:55+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
Shape_Area	5.8654
addr_place	AL SINDICATO AGRARIO DE LA COMUNIDAD KALLUTACA PARCELA 201
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.

It is unnecessary to enter an area measurement in the data because it can be calculated. 

You use a key for an address (addr:municipality) for a location name (is_in:) and write names of parcels as location names (correct would be addr:place instead of addr_place). 

The use of mixed case for addr:place and name is more than desirable. 

Also, please make sure that there is no information from the owner or tenant of the plot in the names.
SomeoneElse (2022-01-22 16:00:36+00:00): What was the source of this data?
rodolfovargas (2022-01-23 14:30:11+00:00): Hola.
Levantamiento de datos en campo.
user_5359 (2022-01-23 14:54:16+00:00): Thank you for getting back to us after a long time. Please remember to correct the errors mentioned as well. I will take the liberty of translating the essential part of your comments into Spanish again.

Gracias por volver a contactar con nosotros después de mucho tiempo. Por favor, recuerde corregir también los errores mencionados. Me tomaré la libertad de volver a traducir la parte esencial de tus comentarios al español.
No es necesario introducir una medida de superficie en los datos porque se puede calcular.
Se utiliza una clave para una dirección (addr:municipio) para un nombre de ubicación (is_in:) y se escriben los nombres de las parcelas como nombres de ubicación (lo correcto sería addr:lugar en lugar de addr_lugar).
El uso de mayúsculas y minúsculas para addr:place y nombre es más que deseable.
Además, asegúrese de que no hay información del propietario o arrendatario de la parcela en los nombres.
xmd5a (2021-04-09 07:13:51+00:00): Тег disused значит что объект не используется по назначению, а тег abandoned - то, что объект заброшен. Это не всегда одно и то же.
WANTES (2021-04-09 07:16:41+00:00): В данных правках все так и есть, аэропорт и заброшен, разрушен и не используется. Я знал что у вас будут вопросы. В данном случае прошу одобрить правки.
xmd5a (2021-04-09 08:04:21+00:00): На аэродроме стоит тег disused=no, что значит "используется по назначению". В данном случае надо "yes". https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2076798387
В OSM модераторов нет и правки принимаются автоматически. Я по своей инициативе слежу за Владимирской областью.
WANTES (2021-04-09 08:23:22+00:00): За это прошу прощения, проглядел yes с no
WANTES (2021-04-09 08:24:47+00:00): По идеи вообще метку аэродром нужно убрать, но я боюсь это делать, последний ан садился на нем ещё в 90-х, с тех пор туда дорога заблокирована строительным мусором, ангар разрушен, взлетев разрушена. Как в таком случае поступить?
xmd5a (2021-04-09 11:55:04+00:00): Можно использовать префикс жизненного цикла
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0#.D0.A1.D1.82.D0.B0.D0.B4.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.B5.D1.81.D1.82.D0.B5.D1.81.D1.82.D0.B2.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D0.BE.D0.B9_.D0.B4.D0.B5.D0.B3.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B4.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D0.B8
Тут подойдёт disused:" , судя по всему
xmd5a (2021-04-09 11:55:24+00:00): Ну или abandoned:
xmd5a (2021-04-09 11:56:23+00:00): Инфу типа icao удалять не нужно. Это же относится и к удалению зданий. Тег building заменяется на was:building, а адресация остаётся.
WANTES (2021-04-09 12:00:08+00:00): Или все таки, ruined:"
xmd5a (2021-04-09 12:07:47+00:00): Не велика разница, на самом деле
Gwenj (2021-04-11 12:13:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas les attributs ajoutés rue de la Madeleine :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691655620
Côté gauche ce n’est pas un shared_lane mais bien une bande à contre-sens, donc plutôt opposite_lane
De plus, cette bande est bien à sens unique, donc pourquoi ajouter cycleway:left:oneway=-1 qui concerne plutôt les pistes biderectionnelles ?

Pour la portion au nord :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691655617
la bande est à contre-sens, donc ce serait plutôt
cycleway:left=opposite_lane

Merci