piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-12 13:58:56+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855483
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855481
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855484
you have created the new lifecycle-prefix `broken`. Could it also be `demolished`?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:
SomeoneElse (2017-10-12 14:52:57+00:00): No, it's not demolished, it's just broken.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-12 14:55:07+00:00): Ok. ;-)
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=broken
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=damaged
ivanbranco (2022-02-13 09:16:41+00:00): Hi sfrank,

I know this is a 4 years old changeset, but I also see you're still active in India so maybe you can help me.

You mapped a place called Malaiyalam Reserved Forest (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157858338), but is located inside Pattaraikadu Reserved Forest (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7628100). It seems strange to have a Reserved Forest inside a Reserved Forest.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 12:30:05+00:00): Hi.  Can you say why you removed the name of the street?
Nakaner (2017-10-12 12:23:48+00:00): Hi rmikke,

people are discussing the addition of Wikidata keys to OSM on several mailing lists and serveral parts of the OSM forum. You can find the links in the recent issues of WeeklyOSM and Wochennotiz.

Carrying on these edits although folks on several mailing lists and parts of the OSM forum still discuss the topic is an unfriendly behaviour showing a lack of respect towards them. Therefore I hereby ask you to pause these edits for one to two months. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-October/079069.html

In addition, your edits are of mechanical nature. Several changeset comments pointing to your errors prove this. An edit using search & replace of JOSM or semi-automatical tag addition is also a mechanical edit. Mechanical edits must follow the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. Your changeset did not comply with these rules. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards

Michael
geri-oc (2018-12-27 18:43:44+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=sv&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch295=1&ch296=1&ch297=1&ch298=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&ch20=1&ch60=1&ch300=1&ch360=1&ch390=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=118270575&highlight_schema=18&lat=57.62951&lon=16.32531&zoom=13&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413%2C20%2C60%2C300%2C360%2C390

Greetings from Germany for 2019 by Gerd
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-21 12:23:33+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4442080651 jest już zbudowany?
GerdP (2022-10-03 14:07:45+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier dem Gebäude bzw. dem Restaurant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43207374 ein wheelchair=no gegeben. Unterdessen heißt das Restaurant "da Sergio", aber ich frage mich, warum da ein wheelchair=no dran hängt. Ich bin keine Rolli-Experte, aber es gibt und gab dort immer eine Rampe zur Eingangstür (von der Ampel her) und im Restaurant auch keine Stufen. Bei den Toiletten habe ich keine klare Erinnerung. 
Evtl. hast Du nur die Treppe vorm Haus gesehen?
Ansonsten wäre das ein wheelchair=limited, oder?
jmsbert (2022-10-03 21:36:47+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
nach Prüfung der Historie scheint das wheelchair=no tatsächlich von mir zu stammen. Warum ich mich dafür entschieden hatte kann ich nicht sagen. Vergebe das Tag eigentlich sehr selten, da ich auch kein Experte bin. Alten gpx-Track vom 08.10.2017 hab' ich noch inkl. Fotos - die zeigen zwar die Speisekarte, die Eingangstür, nicht aber den Außenbereich davor. Im Restaurant selbst war ich damals nicht - über die Toiletten kann ich daher nichts sagen. Wenn eine Rampe vorhanden ist, wäre wheelchair=yes, ggf. auch "limited" angebracht. Als wheelchair_description könnte noch auf "Zugang über Rampe von Anpel" ergänzt werden. Auf der angebotenen 3D-Raumtour sieht man, dass es einen Außenbereich gibt (outdoor_seating=yes) mit einer ebenerdigen Pforte zur Straße hin. Also gerne ändern, was ich mir beim wheelchair=no gedacht hatte, kann ich nicht mehr recherchieren. Gruß aus CLP
GerdP (2022-10-04 05:02:37+00:00): OK, ich schau da mal rein. Evtl. hast Du die Attribute per copy+paste von einem anderen Restaurant übernommen und das wheelchair übersehen.
kartonage (2017-10-10 03:50:13+00:00): Hallo g79,
auf jeden Fall kann man das ergänzen wenn das ab dort schon so ist. Soweit ich das sehen kann ist die "Am Paschenberg" Richtung Haardstraße auch schon als verkehrsberuhigt eingetragen (wird auf der Hauptkarte etwas grauer dargestellt). Da könntest du dir auch ansehen, wie das gemacht wird. Das ganze wird über den "highway=*" tag geregelt. In diesem Fall also nicht "highway=residential", sondern "highway=living_street" (bzw. in Deutsch: "Anliegerstraße" in "verkehrsberuhigter Bereich"). Im iD-Editor kann man das entweder ganz oben ändern oder etwas weiter unten bei den Tags.

Hoffe das konnte deine Frage beantworten.
Schöne Grüße
g79 (2017-10-10 15:47:57+00:00): Hallo kartonage,

ich habe das gerade probiert und hoffe, dass es passt.

Danke für die Hilfe und viele Grüße

g79
bjoern_m (2018-03-04 18:46:55+00:00): Moin,
die Ballustrade der Elbphilharmonie sieht mit tunnel=* und gleichzeitig bridge=aquaedukt sehr komisch vom Tagging her aus, ist das sicher ein Aquädukt oder sorgt das nur dafür, dass es im Renderer gut aussieht?? Passen da vielleicht andere Tags aus dem 3D-Bereich besser?
Viele Grüße
Björn :)
4004 (2017-10-12 21:42:43+00:00): review requested by error
Alexander-II (2018-01-02 16:50:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы в этой правке залили всё вокруг монумента дорогой. Это неверно. Я переделал на мультиполигон и исключил из него здание и газоны.
GinaroZ (2019-09-30 20:03:31+00:00): Is this still closed? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91342263/history
RicoElectrico (2017-10-12 00:44:55+00:00): Cześć. Dzięki, że dodałeś nazwy. No ale została stara adresacja. Poprosilem na forum, żeby nasi spece zaktualizowali je z danych urzędowych (jeśli są dostępne).

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=667809#p667809

Inna kwestia. Proszę o niewzrorowanie się tym, co zastałeś: highway=track ("Droga polna lub leśna") to właśnie to. Używanie jej dla zwykłych publicznych dróg w terenie zabudowanym jest błędem. Wiele nawigacji je omija. To, że droga jest nieutwardzona po prostu oznaczamy w polu powierzchni (tag surface= ).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Ja bym tu dał highway=residential i surface=unpaved (nieutwardzona bez szczegółowego określania).
Warin61 (2022-09-13 02:07:26+00:00): Hi,

The relation 'Cliff Oval' says both pitches have this name. Looking at the base map .. that would seem to indicate only the northern one has that name? 
Thoughts?
Warin61 (2022-09-13 02:29:44+00:00): Arr 
Got it from council web site 
Thanks - don't bother to respond. :)
WoodWoseWulf (2022-09-13 03:04:30+00:00): If you'd like another spanner in the works, I think there used to be a sign here that said "Cliff Oval Reserve".
Not sure if it's still there, I haven't stopped by Wahroonga since 2020.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 12:41:08+00:00): In the future, please put the digits for the address in the addr:housenumber field.
philippec (2019-07-04 19:26:29+00:00): defibrillator niet indoor veronderstel ik
robbieonsea (2019-07-14 11:45:34+00:00): Yes. From what I recall the defibrillator is outdoors of the main building (not currently mapped - possibly the town hall?) in the central square.
Владимир К (2018-03-13 09:09:38+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Спасибо за ваш вклад!
Давайте немного разберемся
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531354132 что это такое? Деревья? а название у них где-то на табличке написано, или просто местные так называют?
3vivekb (2017-12-06 02:24:36+00:00): Please be careful that sidewalk tags aren't used as crossings.
elkueb (2018-01-27 17:54:48+00:00): Hi, it looks like after your deletions there are large parts of the lake that are missing.
Do you plan to redraw the missing parts more accurately or could these be restored?
Richard (2018-04-02 22:11:02+00:00): Just spotted this as well. The lake is currently not rendering because the multipolygon is broken. kh12, are you planning to look at this?
kh12 (2018-04-03 00:01:09+00:00): I can attempt to fix it the best I can. It's certainly fixable, and I'll look into it as soon as I can. Thank you for the heads up.
eggie (2017-10-10 06:54:32+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 22:08:07+00:00): Please add a path (desire line) if there is one here.  Adding this node is not helpful.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 22:06:12+00:00): The path already exists here.  Not sure what you're trying to indicate.  Deleting this.
eggie (2017-10-10 07:00:55+00:00): Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure park is dus de functie en niet het grondgebruik. 
Kleine stukje goen worden ook getagd als landuse=village_geen.
Verder liever geen gras over water tekenen.
De busstop Amerbos heb je verwijderd. Was dat de bedoeling? Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-10-10 07:10:57+00:00): Wegen svp niet vastplakken aan andere objecten zoals park of grass
eggie (2017-10-10 07:33:54+00:00): Even als voorbeeld details ingevuld. Losse bomen natural tree kun je ook gebruiken. 
Niet elk stukje groen is een park. Kijk als voorbeeld eens naar het Vliegenbos.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. In het begin volgen we de edits van startende mappers ... ook om te helpen.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 22:02:05+00:00): If there is an entrance here, then add an appropriate path (eg "desire line").  This tag is not valid.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 22:04:16+00:00): The church already exists.  Why adding a duplicate.  I am removing this.
eggie (2017-10-10 07:02:47+00:00): Dit kan worden ingevuld als landuse=village_green. Het is geen park. Een park is een transparant
eggie (2017-10-10 07:38:50+00:00): Verander je het zelf?
hburnaman (2017-10-12 23:33:22+00:00): Good attention to detail and shaping, and an important area. Good job! -HB
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 21:53:57+00:00): Did you notice the bus stop is already there?  Why did you add another one?  I am removing this.
Linie29 (2018-09-17 17:08:57+00:00): Irgendwie passt "speed limit data added" nicht ganz dazu wenn der maxspeed-Key im Zuge der Änderung auf der ganzen Strecke entfernt worden ist. Wenns zeitlich geht bitte die entsprechenden Werte wieder einfügen.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 21:41:16+00:00): This point does not seem relevent.  There is already a bike path here.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 21:40:42+00:00): This point does not seem relevant.
eggie (2017-10-10 07:05:51+00:00): oneway no heeft als enige functie andere mappers er op te wijzen dat het geen oneway is. Bv bij fietspaden op rotondes of parallelfietspaden.
Beter is dan note=oneway no
 Haal je die tags er weer af?
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 21:56:26+00:00): The Beaver Boxing Club already exists on the map.  We don't need 2 of them.  Removing this one.
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-10 09:58:39+00:00): Note that meters is the default unit for tag "height". So " m" is not required and is considered as an error by a number of QA tools.
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-10 09:58:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height
chachafish (2017-10-10 16:24:27+00:00): Interesting. Thanks :)
hoream_telenav (2018-05-14 11:50:21+00:00): hello, I saw that you added a conditional turn restriction based on OSC; but I can't see it; are you sure it's there? because as I can see you also have a "only_left" sign
Minh Nguyen (2018-05-14 16:42:23+00:00): I was referring to this image: https://openstreetcam.org/details/522233/2531/track-info
Apparently I was off by one intersection; fixed in changeset 58958432.
Radek Dostal (2017-10-10 19:02:04+00:00): Hi, you are adding top speed of 250km/h on very curvy railroads. That is technically unfeasible.
Negjana (2017-10-11 12:30:02+00:00): Ah damnit, that was just a temporary help for me. Will repair it. Thanks for letting me know!
Negjana (2017-10-11 12:30:49+00:00): Aaaand corrected.
Radek Dostal (2017-10-12 17:47:42+00:00): Thank you for fixing it, openrailwaymap looks sensible again :)
user_5359 (2017-10-10 18:33:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the parking area to main building!
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 13:35:03+00:00): Your change has been reverted.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
4004 (2017-10-12 21:51:37+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
вот почему у вас везде манера ставить сокращения? они так и записаны на местности?
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 13:15:24+00:00): You removed Glenview Avenue as a street, is that correct?
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 13:34:47+00:00): Your change has been reverted.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 13:35:27+00:00): Your change has been reverted.
Eduard Popov (2017-11-09 02:54:41+00:00): Здравствуйте.
У вас тут граница сломалась https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7507441, можете поправить?
majid1359 (2017-10-10 04:51:44+00:00): دانشکده نیست آموزشکده درست است
TBKMrt (2017-10-10 05:55:26+00:00): I have no idea why this changeset is empty. JOSM wasn't able to upload it, no matter what settings you selected.
majid1359 (2017-10-10 04:58:59+00:00): مکان تکرار بود اشتباه بود
majid1359 (2017-10-10 04:59:23+00:00): مکان اداره گاز  تکرار شده بود پاک شد
user_5359 (2017-10-10 18:22:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .

If you need help: You are welcome.
majid1359 (2017-10-10 05:18:35+00:00): اصلاح اسم دبیرستان شاهد
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-10 14:13:18+00:00): Ano, to už je lepší. Ještě je otázka jestli ten přístřešek má jméno? Já bych řekl že asi ne. Jméno má rybník (mimochodem v mapě to jméno rybníku chybí), město, potok, ale přístřešek obvykle ne. Pokud mu tak ovšem říkáte, tak to klidně může zůstat.
user_5359 (2017-10-10 18:07:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2017-10-10 18:04:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-10-10 07:23:15+00:00): This reverts changesets 52763319, 52761989
dgitto (2017-10-11 12:40:36+00:00): Hi. In this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531380884
There is a typo in the access key "acces"
dgitto (2017-10-11 12:58:40+00:00): Also, the usage of the key "access" with those values is a bit discouraged. See the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions
To avoid false-positive errors
eggie (2017-10-10 08:54:30+00:00): Dag S_Emo... wellicht beter om de nieuwe rondweg er als highway=construction te taggen.
Het was in juni al een puzzel om met de fiets door het gebied te komen.
eggie (2017-10-10 08:56:04+00:00): Wanneer er nog niets te zien is tag je highway=proposed en wanneer er al gewerkt wordt highway=construction.
jaap de vries (2017-10-10 09:02:06+00:00): Ik heb ook gereageerd, nieuwe mapper heeft als bron de provincie. Dat is oke, maar daar staat een verbeeldingstekening van 18-7-2013 staat in pdf op de site sinds okt 2016. Deze aub niet gebruiken voor het intekenen van de toekomstige nieuwe N264.
eggie (2017-10-10 09:09:50+00:00): Ik zet ze wel even op proposed. Van de zomer waren ze wel volop bezig daar, maar nog niet aan het nieuwe tracé.
Dan moet S_Emo maar even kijken wanneer het op construction kan.
eggie (2017-10-10 09:14:40+00:00): proposed nu. Ik kijk nog even naar het plakwerk. Wegen zitten aan de landuse vast volgens mij.
eggie (2017-10-10 09:16:02+00:00): N264 ook niet name= gebruiken, maar ref=
De weg heeft misschien ook een naam straks.
eggie (2017-10-10 09:25:43+00:00): Plakwerk losgemaakt. Bij verschuiven van de omleiding was het vlak van het gras meegekomen.
Ook node verbinding gemaakt met het zuidelijke fietspad, maar dat loopt nu dood zie ik. 
Ik heb toen die nieuwe omleiding al genomen met de fiets om op de Bengels te komen. De tracklog zal ik nog wel ergens hebben.
S_Emo (2017-10-10 18:05:04+00:00): Hartelijk dank allemaal. Eggie en Jaap.
Duidelijk. Ik houd het in de gaten. Ik ben er mee bezig en ga er ook mee verder als jullie dat goed vinden. Fietspaden wil ik ook nog doen (maar moet ik eerst nog even goed naar gaan kijken). Ik kom er regelmatig (ongeveer wekelijks) langs. De rotonde in het weiland ligt er al, maar is nog niet (helemaal) geasfalteerd cq af. De wegen liggen er ook al (grotendeels /  maar nog geen asfalt) tussen de Hapseweg / St.Hubertse weg en de rotonde Zoetsmeersweg.
Eggie schrijft dat wegen aan landuse vastzitten...... daar ga ik naar kijken / op letten. Als ik er niet uitkomt, maak ik een opmerking met een vraag daarover als het jij / jullie dat goedvinden.
Ik ga ook nog even kijken of ik / hoe ik verkeerslichten kan toevoegen (met name bij A73.
jaap de vries (2017-10-11 07:59:36+00:00): Maandag lag hier enkel nog een puinbaan op enkel plaatsen, die door werkverkeer wordt gebruikt en op sommige plekken waren er hoogte palen in de grond geslagen.
user_5359 (2017-10-10 18:02:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Serzhanya (2017-10-20 00:16:53+00:00): highway=living_street используются исключительно для именованных улиц со знаком "жилая зона". Жилая улица без этого знака обозначается highway=residential. Именованные улицы в садовых товариществах также обозначаются highway=residential.
Serzhanya (2017-10-20 00:18:38+00:00): И ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста с соглашением об именовании дорог в России (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3#.D0.9A.D0.B0.D0.BA_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.BE.D1.81.D0.B8.D1.82.D1.8C_.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D0.BA.D0.B0.D1.80.D1.82.D1.83)
4004 (2017-10-12 21:54:07+00:00): и снова здравствуйте,
завод отмечен лэндюзом с именем, думаю, туда стоит эту информацию вносить.
ramyaragupathy (2017-10-10 06:51:45+00:00): source is Bing, not TIGER
Alan Bragg (2017-10-11 22:03:43+00:00): Hi, Looks like you were busy adding parking lot lanes near Crosby Drive in bedford. Many of them seem to be missing connectors between the ends of aisles. You might consider adding the tag service=parking_aisle to complement highway=service
Thanks for your work, the map is looking more complete
TeresaPeteti (2017-10-12 04:24:16+00:00): Hi, Thank you so much for bringing these to my notice, will try to correct them and in future will be careful.
Alan Bragg (2017-10-12 10:33:17+00:00): No problem. I too appreciate it when people comment on my changesets. Thanks for all the work your doing. I encourage you to spend more time mapping in the Bedford/Burlington MA area. Alan
user_5359 (2017-10-10 17:50:21+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Chris Fleming (2017-10-12 16:40:02+00:00): why remove the maxspeed? - also I'm not sure if an area is actually appropriate here. Think that a standard highway tag will be find here.
GerdP (2017-10-12 16:43:10+00:00): I did not dare to remove the areas. The maxspeed tags are on the normal highway ways and not needed for areas.
If you like, please delete the areas.
I think they were created as an experiment.
user_5359 (2017-10-10 17:43:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have drawn a polygon over an existing building to enter an address. Please draw an (additional) point into the main building and enter all information there. For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
SK53 (2018-09-10 13:48:30+00:00): I'm reverting this edit because the building as formerly mapped is correct. As the name of the garden implies it sits on the roof of the building, which is built into the hillside and stepped down on the N side. I should know I worked there.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-10-10 07:49:05+00:00): This reverts changeset 52761201
majid1359 (2017-10-10 07:40:06+00:00): برخی مکان ها ثبت انها اشتباه بود پاک شد
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-13 17:10:25+00:00): Retagged as amenity=post_office
4004 (2017-10-12 21:55:14+00:00): Isn't it "operator=BelToll"?
Jay May (2017-10-13 06:25:49+00:00): What do you mean? That is what I wrote, right? :)
4004 (2017-10-13 22:03:44+00:00): yeah, you did, but you also added name=BelToll, Jay. Is it really necessary there? It could be argued it's not really the name of the node
Jay May (2017-10-14 10:33:49+00:00): From a driver’s point of view it is more than useful, especially for drivers wanting to bypass as many toll booths as possiblr. I know what you mean, but I’m afraid putting the whole name “BelToll toll booth for buses, trucks, and non-Customs-Union cars” would not be effective from a user point of view. Everybody understands quickly if they see „BelToll”.
4004 (2017-10-14 17:32:16+00:00): I see your point, but I'm just not sure this is correct tagging, adding a name tag just so this is easily discernible on the map. Technically speaking, all public road tolls on Belarusian roads are run by Beltoll, so one should assume it's Beltoll when noticing a booth tagged. To confirm this, "operator" is usually more than enough. 
I am fairly sure most toll scanners are unnamed.
Jay May (2017-10-16 06:23:08+00:00): There is still a lot of things to agree on those BelToll things. Some people are tagging it "toll=no, toll:hgv=yes", which I don't agree with because all cars which are not from the Customs Union need to pay. We must find a way for that to be reflected on OSM. Are you participating in the  BY OSM Telegram chat?
4004 (2017-10-16 21:19:22+00:00): tagging the toll key is another matter (although an important one), I was originally concerned with the usage of name tag here
majid1359 (2017-10-10 07:49:13+00:00): مکان تکراری حذف شد و اصلاحات صورت گرفت
ToeBeeFixit (2017-10-10 08:04:04+00:00): This reverts changesets 52758521, 52758171, 52758116
alexey_zakharenkov (2017-10-10 18:06:26+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Буква в адресах должна быть большой. А если есть ещё и номер строения, то после пробела идёт маленькая буква "с" и номер. Например, так: "9А с3"
ToeBeeFixit (2017-10-10 08:19:32+00:00): This reverts changeset 52758168