piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tastrax (2019-07-11 04:41:35+00:00): Hi HindmarshSquare - It was only the very northern part of the island that I updated with that custom imagery. Do you know which is the latest and best imagery for the whole island? Yep, met Andrew - need a few more mapathons for Red Cross to get them interested in OSM!
HindmarshSquare (2019-07-15 02:39:50+00:00): Hi tastrax, You can use DG premium Imagery/ Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) for the whole island. Happy Mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-02 00:23:48+00:00): Hi there,

What is this park supposed to be?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6582969994
It looks like you've got it in a building.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-02 00:30:57+00:00): Also, sorry to pick on you but:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700973304

In OSM, natural=wood is normally defined in this way:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
Basically as a "tree covered area"

I'm not sure what this location is (maybe a saw mill? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial=sawmill) but you might want to revise your tagging :)
VictorIE (2024-05-06 01:18:02+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700973498

Perhaps abandoned:highway=*
mariotomo (2021-12-19 17:02:24+00:00): hola.  veo muchas ediciones a este nombre en Panamá.  vives en el área?
Rassilon (2019-07-02 00:46:26+00:00): Oops forgot to change source: Its actually MassGIS; aerial imagery & streetside imagery
maraf24 (2019-07-03 08:10:52+00:00): To nie jest track. To jest dojazd do gopodarstwa i dalej do wsi i wyraźnie widać, że jest tak używany.
datamongers (2019-07-02 12:21:47+00:00): It looks like you removed the `tourism=caravan_site` tagging from this way with this edit, and it now lacks tagging that most software will be able to do anything with.
chimani (2019-07-02 12:54:40+00:00): This was a mistake as I was editing a different region and the search query gave me this. It can be reverted, corrected.
Warin61 (2019-07-04 06:30:00+00:00): Hi
Botany St still looks to be under construction, you changed it from highway=construction to highway=residential leaving construction=residential .. which is confusing. 

So what is it?
viloan (2019-07-02 01:52:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
b-jazz (2019-07-08 17:11:30+00:00): Way 700982938 is drawn in a way that it overlaps with itself and creates three areas. Is that what is intended? If so, the way needs to be drawn in such a way that it doesn't intersect itself.
MissingCSAA (2019-07-08 17:29:56+00:00): Yes, I suppose I could have mapped that cleaner. Hate those checkerboard boundaries.
viloan (2019-07-02 03:15:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-07-23 23:35:57+00:00): Hi,

About Carss Park. 
According to the LPI Base Map the park does not stop where the trees are but extends further. And I would include the car parks as part of the park too. In short, look at the LPI Base Map for the park boundaries and try and resolve that to any signs on the ground. 

Note: I have tagged the swimming pool as 'disused' due to its closure caused by the water leaks.
CartographicChels (2019-07-12 16:39:11+00:00): Hey AlexLabrada,
The trunk segments you created in this area created a disconnected network and duplicated data where way 700989241 was drawn over a primary way 70098924. Could you please fix this areas classifications and validation errors, thank you  - CartographicChels
iriman (2019-07-02 19:44:25+00:00): سلام. رابطهٔ گردش به چپ ممنوعی که آن را حذف کرده‌اید با تابلوی راهنمایی‌ورانندگی مشخص شده. آیا حضوری آن را بررسی کرده‌اید و این ممنوعیت برداشته شده؟ بنده در تگ یادداشت هم به این موضوع اشاره کرده‌ام. با تشکر
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71805596
iriman (2019-07-02 19:50:29+00:00): برای اطلاع عرض کنم که بنده حتی محل تابلوی محدودیت را هم مشخص کرده بودم. یعنی عضو چهارم این رابطه، گرهِ 5800466153
بوده که نقش 
location_hint
داشت
iriman (2019-07-21 13:26:54+00:00): سلام. این رابطه‌ها را برگرداندم. چون تا جایی که میدانم تابلو ممنوعیت داشت.
nshz (2019-07-22 06:07:44+00:00): سلام . ممنون بابت اصلاح
Jonathan Harker (2019-07-02 13:47:12+00:00): Hello :-D
Bek76 (2019-07-02 20:18:59+00:00): You've got a silly hat
user_5359 (2019-07-02 04:28:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For more details please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-02 05:08:17+00:00): I think you might have missed your target with this one. You put a park in the middle of the harbor!
Fightingshy (2019-07-02 16:20:33+00:00): There was no way to include the harbor without tagging it as something. Harbor was not included among the available tags.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-02 21:28:01+00:00): Was this the feature you were trying to add? It's already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667248104
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-02 05:12:32+00:00): OSM is a public map, please don't add personal details such as who lives in a particular house.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
iriman (2019-07-02 15:49:21+00:00): سلام. از وجود این دوربرگردان مطمئن هستید؟ اینجا دقیقا ورودی و خروجی پل شریعتی هست. با تشکر
iriman (2019-07-21 13:17:59+00:00): سلام. این مورد اصلاح شد. دوبرگردان نداره.
nshz (2019-07-22 03:33:01+00:00): سلام. ممنون بابت اصلاح
iriman (2019-07-02 17:27:18+00:00): سلام. از وجود دوربرگردان در ورودی و خروجی پل شریعتی مطمئن هستید؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71806132
iriman (2019-07-21 13:18:28+00:00): سلام. این مورد اصلاح شد. دوربرگردان نداره. با تشکر
nshz (2019-07-22 03:33:58+00:00): سلام. ممنون بابت اصلاح
user_5359 (2019-07-02 04:26:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add many amenity=parking to the nodes of smaller highways. Do you know the tag highway=turning_circle (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle)?
iriman (2019-07-02 17:11:30+00:00): سلام. تگ یکطرفه روی 
roundaboutها
ضروری نیست. چون طبق مستندات ویکی خودبه‌خود یکطرفه محسوب میشه. البته بودنش هم مشکلی ایجاد نمیکنه. چون دیدم اضافه میکنید گفتم بگم و این که در جریان باشید خیلی از 
roundaboutها
الان تگ یکطرفه ندارن و طبق مستندات ویکی پذیرفته است. با تشکر
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71806323
iriman (2019-07-02 17:05:57+00:00): سلام. ماشین‌رو نبودن معادل این نیست که درجه راه را به راه پیاده تغییر بدیم. چون یکسری وسایل دیگه هم منع میشن. مثل دوچرخه و موتور. البته اینجا در تصاویر ماهواره‌ای خودروها قابل‌رویت هستند.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71806342
iriman (2019-07-02 16:58:53+00:00): سلام. ماشین‌رو نبودن معادل این نیست که درجه راه را به راه پیاده تغییر بدیم. چون یکسری وسایل دیگه هم منع میشن. مثل دوچرخه و موتور. البته اینجا در تصاویر ماهواره‌ای خودروها داخل کوچه قابل‌رویت هستند. شاید انتهای کوچه جدول داره که میشه اون قسمت رو فقط اصلاح کرد
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71806446
BCNorwich (2019-07-02 07:14:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've placed your node, which looks like a house address in the middle of Murchison Road. It would be best to amend the particular house outline to include your house information. As it is the information is of no use. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
iriman (2019-07-02 16:22:59+00:00): سلام. ماشین‌رو نبودن معادل این نیست که درجه راه را به راه پیاده تغییر بدیم. چون یکسری وسایل دیگه هم منع میشن. مثل دوچرخه و موتور. البته اینجا در تصاویر ماهواره‌ای خودروها قابل‌رویت هستند. اگر منظورتان این است که مناسب عبور همه نیست راه‌های بهتری برای مشخص کردن آن وجود دارد. مثلا تگ 
access=destination
دسترسی را به کسانی میدهد که مقصدشان اینجا باشد. برای بحث بیشتر میتونید به گروه تلگرامی اُ اس ام ایران تشریف بیارید. شاید راه‌های دیگری هم وجود داشته باشد. با تشکر
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71806760
iriman (2019-07-02 21:25:29+00:00): سلام. ماشین‌رو نبودن معادل این نیست که درجه راه را به راه پیاده تغییر بدیم. چون یکسری وسایل دیگه هم منع میشن. مثل دوچرخه و موتور. البته در این مورد تصاویر ماهواره‌ای خودرویی را داخل کوچه نشان می‌دهد. با تشکر
iriman (2019-07-02 16:10:36+00:00): سلام. ماشین‌رو نبودن معادل این نیست که درجه راه را به راه پیاده تغییر بدیم. چون یکسری وسایل دیگه هم منع میشن. مثل دوچرخه و موتور. اگر منظورتان این است که مناسب عبور همه نیست راه‌های بهتری وجود دارد. مثلا تگ 
access=destination
دسترسی را به کسانی میدهد که مقصدشان اینجا باشد. برای بحث بیشتر میتونید به گروه تلگرامی اُ اس ام ایران تشریف بیارید. شاید راه‌های دیگری هم وجود داشته باشد. با تشکر
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71807028
SomeoneElse (2019-11-24 11:17:06+00:00): Hello,
While reverting some "Google Maps"-sourced data here I came across https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620396016/history .  You've edited it since the problem user did, and you presumably did not use Google Maps.  If you're happy that the way as it currently exists in OSM is wholly based on Maxar imagery then I'd suggest that you just remove the "source=Google Maps" tag from it.  If not, let me know (by commenting here or by emailing the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org) and I'll delete it prior to redaction.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
VLD124 (2019-11-26 06:37:46+00:00): Hello Andy,
Please look into the below changeset discussion. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71815557
Glassman (2019-07-03 02:41:24+00:00): Tip: Just adjust the existing outline to retain the history of an object rather than deleting them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71807386
Sosha1996 (2019-07-03 08:19:15+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «فضای سبز» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-03 08:19:10+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «فضای سبز» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Glassman (2019-07-03 02:38:25+00:00): We usually add parking as an area tagged amenity=parking or just a node. Turning circle are those areas found in cul-de-sacs. Can you update?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71807962
user_5359 (2019-07-06 04:13:29+00:00): Hello! You add the key  rap_ref (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KvX). There is a similar key ref:raa (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref%3Araa). Could it be a typo?
b-unicycling (2022-10-25 10:51:39+00:00): would it be possible to translate site_type=stensättning into English, please?
ChehrehBargi (2019-07-30 11:13:21+00:00): کمتر از یک ماه پیش و چند بار قبل از آن، شما اقدام به حذف راه اتصال دهنده خیابان دانشگاه و شورابیل کرده اید. که این کار خرابکاری به حساب می آید. اگر به موردی شک دارید در گروه ایران OsM مطرح کنید و تنها مواردی را تغییر دهید که مطمئن هستید. در صورت حذف دوباره، کاربری شما گزارش خواهد شد.
sajjadOSM (2019-09-08 04:45:05+00:00): سلام این راه اکنون مسدود می باشد و در صورت حذف نکردن ان نقشه و مسیریابی تاکسی های آنلاین به مشکل برمی خورد
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 08:52:45+00:00): نقشه باید درست ثبت شود؛ این که برنامه ها مسیر دارای راهبند رو تشخیص نمی دهد ایراد برنامه هست و osm طبق آن نرم‌افزارها کار نمی‌کند. OSM تنها دیتا بیس است و باگ نرم افزارها باید توسط سازنده رفع شود نه اینکه نقشه طبق آن تعریف شود
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 08:55:02+00:00): برای این نقطه اگر دقت کنید راهبند تعریف شده که در خود محل هم همین طور است.
Hjart (2019-07-02 06:48:28+00:00): When mapping in Denmark please make sure to use our national SDFE aerial imagery, which is generally much more recent than all other options
geozeisig (2019-07-02 15:44:02+00:00): Thanks for the hint. The SDFE picture is really good.
Constable (2019-07-02 10:08:55+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OSM!
I've noticed you've been adding a lot of objects to our map in the last couple of days.
Please slow down a bit and make sure you do things the right way.
You've been adding a lot of names, but you have to understand that not every object deserves a name. You would name "White house" the White House, but you wouldn't name "House" every house of the map, "tree" every tree, "Church" every curch and so on.
Here you added a church named Baptist, but I'm pretty sure it's name is not "Baptist".
Tags are there for a reason, if you want to say that a building is a church you have to use the right tag (building=church), if you want to say that a church is run by Baptists, you should use denomination=Baptist tag and so on.
Same works for this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700270064 , if you want to say it's a dog park you should tag is as a leisure=dog_park. Now that one looks like a park, named "Dog Park".
Look at this map https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/37.5615/-121.9947&layers=N and please adjust what's been pointed out by those red notes. Please make sure you also add a comment to those notes.
Should you need any tips, please reply here!
Thanks!
Leo Slager (2019-07-02 08:49:57+00:00): Hi Paul,
Je vraagt om een review.
Je hebt de aanvullende gegevens netjes toegevoegd aan de bestaande adres-node.
De naam "Ymere Haarlem" heeft voor derden niet zoveel betekenis.
M.i. zou "Woningbouwvereniging Ymere" beter zijn.
PaulV62 (2019-07-02 11:16:25+00:00): Is inderdaad beter. Ga er even naar kijken
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-02 17:58:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76533916 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in poor/fantasy mapping in China.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3244 for more information.
abakus_uploader (2019-07-02 22:30:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Jakka (2019-07-02 07:29:25+00:00): Het gebruikte adres is niet 100% correct is adress voor Patershof zelf deze dus niet als dusdanig vermelden. Dubbel adres dat bestaat niet....
shasband (2019-07-05 11:26:06+00:00): Apologies for using internal terminologies in OSM. I am new to OSM and We have been advised by senior team members to follow OSM standards while commenting. Please find below the comment for the actual edit – modified the geometry as per the latest imagery
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 16:33:12+00:00): Hello,
You've removed an "access=private" tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/659096881/history .  Was that deiberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
spiregrain (2019-07-02 11:45:33+00:00): Quick question;   I notice that you've renamed the DLR station platforms (e.g. (n5257500827 to "Stratford International Platform 2"). 

Does this create a conflict with n147982064 (Also "Platform 2", but at the nearby mainline HS1 station, also called "Stratford International").
eastender (2019-07-02 13:10:42+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Technically yes it does. But prior to my edits, the platforms were unnamed and the stop positions were just named as “Stratford International”, so I am not sure I have created any additional confusion.

One thing that is missing in that area is a node/area to name the mainline HS1 station. I noticed that such a node/area name was missing but I didn’t get around to adding it as I was focussed on the Docklands Light Railway. If that were added then I think it would be clearer to anyone looking at the map, i.e. the DLR platforms are within the station area labelled as “Stratford International DLR” and the mainline platforms are within the station area labelled as “Stratford International”.

You’ve probably seen that I have been trying to improve the Public Transport Version 2 compliance and naming consistency for the Docklands Light Railway stations, platforms and stop positions. There are several stations where a DLR station has the same name (or is part of) as a National Rail / Underground / Overground station. In some cases, it seems necessary and applicable to apply the suffix “DLR” to the station name and in others it seems unnecessary, even though “DLR” is technically not part of the station name. I took the view that, for DLR platforms and DLR stop positions, they would always be viewed within the context of a DLR station (or a DLR route) and so it was never necessary to add the “DLR” suffix to a DLR platform name or a DLR stop position name.

I hope that provides a rational explanation to my thinking on platform/stop position naming but if you feel that these platforms/stop positions require a “DLR” suffix attached then I have no objection to that.
spiregrain (2019-07-02 13:29:35+00:00): Thanks for your full reply - good to get it in place.

I realised you were working to improve compliance with PTv2 standards.     I agree it's not obvious how to / whether to distinguish the naming between the two Stratfords International - I just wanted to point out the pending potential "problem".  I think it would be neater to have the word "DLR" in the platform names, but it's not important.   

You might also have spotted that MacLondon has recently added the Stratford Intl HS1 station elements into the Stop Area relation for the DLR station.

I've done a bit of work on the HS1 station - some time ago  - fell into the trap of trying to get the station building (with WH Smiths et al) to render above the platforms - bit with no luck.
eastender (2019-07-02 14:43:26+00:00): I understand what has happened now. So, I have repaired and resurrected 598166889 as the stop area for the mainline station. That has restored the “Stratford International” name to the map. So now we have “Stratford International” and “Stratford International DLR” showing correctly on the map (at least in the standard layer).
spiregrain (2019-07-02 16:18:42+00:00): Great stuff - both names are now showing for me too.   (But it's not listed as a Stop Area relation - nor should it be.   Local example of a Transit Stop Area relation would be r7772649 - no idea how useful relevant it would be to do something similar for the DLR infrastructure - I think it's only truly useful for Bus Stops)
dppola (2019-07-05 11:29:00+00:00): Apologies for using internal terminologies in OSM. I am new to OSM and We have been advised by senior team members to follow OSM standards while commenting. Please find below the comment for the actual edit – Created service roads from East Atlantic Avenue
tordans (2019-07-07 04:10:32+00:00): Hi Engersd, danke für die Änderung!
Es freut mich, jemand in Langerwehe + Umgebung aktiv zu sehen :). Wir können in der Gegen mehr aktive Mapper gebrauchen.
VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71811292
Leo Slager (2019-07-02 08:44:51+00:00): Hi pa3ems,
In dat geval zou ik place_of_whorship verwijderen. en building= wijzigen in church, het is immers een karakteristiek gebouw.
name=Elimkerk zoals het op de gevel staat aangegeven.
Je zou ook kunnen overwegen om gebruik te maken van disused:place_of_whorship.
Up to you.
Leo Slager (2019-07-02 08:46:13+00:00): typo: worship