piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:02:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Nakaner-repair (2015-08-29 08:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33658810 where the changeset comment is: Revert of all changesets by streetkeysmv which have been uploaded after 2015-08-25. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=527472#p527472
Hkja99 (2015-08-28 09:59:30+00:00): Minor corrections.
bigopenmac (2015-09-01 17:05:53+00:00): Прошу прощения за сдвинутые точки, мне стыдно. Спасибо, что поправили.
neiljp (2015-08-28 10:35:16+00:00): Thanks for the additions.
In future it would be useful if you could split your edits into smaller chunks, with more descriptive text for what you've changed (and why). This makes it easier to see what has changed later.
For example, I can see you added some roads near the high-rise buildings to the north, but also around the pub and housing office.
If you accidentally delete an object, please undo that change before saving, rather than recreating the object. I'm not sure if that's what's happened with the Shopping centre.
I look forward to working with you :)
neiljp (2015-08-28 10:41:08+00:00): For tagging of CCTV, please consider tags such as listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
For example, with
man_made=surveillance
surveillance=public
surveillance:type=camera
Please ask if you need more help; I could retag but I don't know exactly what was there :)
neiljp (2015-08-28 10:42:50+00:00): Please see my comment on another of your changesets regarding this.
aceman444 (2015-09-03 22:14:42+00:00): Dobry den, co ste prosim chceli dosiahnut s kolajami na nabrezi Dunaja v Bratislave? Zbytocne ste zduplikovali obe kolaje az po Chatam Sofer a existujuce spravne kolaje ste zmenili na nepouzivane? Ved tam elektricky jazdia. Ale od Sturovho namestia po Safarikovo je to OK. Idem to teda opravit.
tosky (2015-08-28 13:45:07+00:00): Come mai il vecchio punto è stato rimosso? Il civico 9 R non esiste proprio?
DangNgu (2015-09-01 12:34:34+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
literan (2015-08-29 12:11:46+00:00): не надо все подряд тащить в тег name (он только для имен собственных, например "Детский сад №55555"). То, что это территория детсада, ясно и из тега
DangNgu (2015-09-01 12:33:21+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
literan (2015-08-29 11:41:04+00:00): правильные теги для такого салона:
contact:website=http://www.salon-rex.ru
name=Рэкс
opening_hours=Mo-Su 10:00-21:00
shop=pet_grooming

адрес не надо, он есть на здании
DangNgu (2015-09-01 12:33:10+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
DangNgu (2015-09-01 12:33:00+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
DangNgu (2015-09-01 11:51:16+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
muralito (2015-08-28 18:12:13+00:00): Estimado:

Cuando qiueras mapear lo que sea de tu interes, agrega lo que necesites pero por favor no modifiques lo existente salvo que lo consideres un error.

En este caso, creo que lo que corresponde es agregar la informacion que te interesa en un elemento separado, dejando el nodo como direccion con todos sus numeros y el resto de la informacion.

Saludos,
M.
DangNgu (2015-09-01 11:51:02+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
VictorIE (2018-04-28 01:02:22+00:00): Is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3718519988 a public library? Not listed here: http://www.fingalcoco.ie/community-and-leisure/libraries/find-a-library-and-check-opening-hours/
zarl (2015-10-05 13:31:38+00:00): Hi Christoph,

seit wann haben denn Strassen eine PLZ? Kann man denen Briefe schreiben? 

Das ist IMHO komplett überflüssig, denn bereits das Ortsgebiet ist als Relation entsprechend eingetragen und vererbt die Information an darin liegende Elemente.

Siehe 
http://www.flosm.de/html/Verwaltungsgrenzen.html

Gruss,
Zarl
zarl (2015-10-30 08:17:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:postal_code -> "Die Verwendung des Tags in Deutschland ist nicht empfohlen, da die Postleitzahlen landesweit als Gebiete vorhanden sind."
DangNgu (2015-09-01 12:32:25+00:00): data is also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg
SomeoneElse (2015-08-28 23:53:51+00:00): As per the comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33537943 , can you explain what the source of the house numbers here is?  What licence was it made available under?
DangNgu (2015-08-31 06:04:22+00:00): Hey. its the official, public map data of Stuttgart
SomeoneElse (2015-08-31 08:53:49+00:00): Thanks.
What's the source and under what licence was it released?
DangNgu (2015-08-31 09:11:46+00:00): www.stuttgart.de/stadtplan
SomeoneElse (2015-08-31 09:38:54+00:00): The licence of that data is not suitable for adding to OpenStreetMap:

https://www.stuttgart.de/item/show/555841

"Nutzungsbedingungen

Programme, Karten, Daten, Dienste, Videos, Publikationen sowie Dokumentationen sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Es gelten die internationalen Copyrightbestimmungen. Die Nutzung eines Kartenausschnitts mit Grundlagedaten ist für nicht kommerzielle Zwecke kostenlos. Voraussetzung ist ein deutlich lesbar angebrachter Copyrightvermerk:

© Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Stadtmessungsamt & GIS-AG "
DangNgu (2015-08-31 09:46:46+00:00): I am not using a certain map excerpt (Kartenausschnitt). I didnt copy a picture or saved a excerpt or anything similiar. So I dont break the copyright. The only thing I do is looking up the housenumber.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-31 10:43:22+00:00): That link says "Programme, Karten, Daten, Dienste, Videos, Publikationen sowie Dokumentationen sind urheberrechtlich geschützt." (Programs, maps, data, services, videos, publications and documentation are copyrighted.)
DangNgu (2015-08-31 10:52:07+00:00): Yes thanks for the translation. I speak German perfectly. It is just saying that they are coyprighted, but that doesn't mean nobody is allowed to touch them.

I am also very well awared of the German Urheberrechtsgesetz and in my opinion I am not violating against anything by looking up the housenumber.

Excuse me but why is that bothering you so much? Are you the license police of OSM? I am just fixing minor stuffs and filling some gaps and not hurting anybody.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-31 11:10:55+00:00): Re "Are you the license police of OSM?" - I'm a member of the Data Working Group https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group .  Your edits elsewhere where raised with us (copying from Google) and I'm also asking about sources of other changesets.

If you have added data to OSM which wasn't suitably licensed it'll need to be removed - please don't add any more until this has been resolved.
DangNgu (2015-08-31 12:02:02+00:00): Thanks for the description. I didn't want to sound harsh. I just wanted to know who you are. But I really don't see any violation by looking up the housenumbers.
DangNgu (2015-08-31 12:38:45+00:00): So what are the next steps now? Can you tell what will happen now?
SomeoneElse (2015-09-01 07:52:59+00:00): There are a couple of options - one is for you to ask the supplier of the data whether it's OK to add the data to OpenStreetMap.  Another is, if you feel that you should be able to add the data regardless of whether they allow it or not, for you to explain why (taking into account the existing copyright notice and any other rights Stuttgart has, such as under the EU database directive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_Directive).  See also https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License for general information.
DangNgu (2015-09-01 08:58:14+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for the answer.
So you won't delete my changes?

In the meanwhile, I have found a license-free map on your wiki site with the same information.
DangNgu (2015-09-01 08:59:17+00:00): Same information of housenumber data, which i can use futher. I didnt want to violate any copyrights on purpose.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-01 09:17:24+00:00): Can you provide details of the "license-free map" that you're talking about?
DangNgu (2015-09-01 09:20:34+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW

"Maps4BW darf auch für OpenStreetMap-Zwecke frei genutzt werden und kann als WMS-Hintergrundbild in JOSM eingebunden werden. In der Pressemitteilung [1] des Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg wird betont, dass mit der Bereitstellung des Dienstes auch eine langjährige Forderung der OpenStreetMap-Community erfüllt wird. "
DangNgu (2015-09-01 09:23:24+00:00): I understand the problem. In my opinion it is not worth to delete my changes. I didn't put wrong or false stuff in osm. And yes I may used an unvalid source, but the Stadtplan Stuttgart is the official site of the state Baden-Württemberg and the same informations are also provided by the state Baden-Württemberg over the source Maps4BW because the state wants to support OSM-Community as do I. So deleting my changes would be a lose-lose-situation. I assure you, I have learned my lesson.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-01 11:35:33+00:00): Thanks.  Where you've used Stuttgart's Stadtplan can you add a comment to the changeset discussion saying that the data's also available from Maps4BW and is therefore compatible as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Baden-W.C3.BCrttemberg ?
DangNgu (2015-09-01 11:46:47+00:00): Ok. I will do it. Thanks
tosky (2015-08-28 13:48:00+00:00): building=school indica che l'edificio ha la forma di... edificio scolastico. Una scuola è amenity=school:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Attenzione anche all'uso di maiuscole e minuscola (la prima lettera è maiuscola).
zors1843 (2015-08-29 07:01:14+00:00): Adres informatie is verwijderd : was dit de bedoeling, of was het enkel de shop die je wilde verwijderen ?
Ambrosia (2015-08-29 07:14:19+00:00): nee, ik ben helemaal nieuw en probeer het programma te leren. dit was een vergissing. mijn excuses. Vincent.
zors1843 (2015-08-29 08:15:34+00:00): Geen probleem hoor. Zal het terugplaatsen.  Bedankt om mee te werken.
Georges
M!dgard (2015-08-29 16:17:56+00:00): Dag hahawin

Tweerichtingsstraten moet je niet expliciet zo aanduiden, tenzij er verwarring kan zijn.

Groeten, M!dgard
alejandroscf (2016-11-22 15:28:13+00:00): No se si eso va en el name... :P
janes (2015-09-19 19:45:06+00:00): No copiïs del ICGC, té errors que si copies es reprodueixen a OSM.
zors1843 (2015-08-29 06:54:59+00:00): Maybe it's the barrier on the tertiary road which should be (re)moved ?
M!dgard (2015-08-30 11:22:16+00:00): Garmin's BaseCamp doesn't use OpenStreetMap as far as I know, so this isn't a problem with our data.
RayRay4105 (2015-08-30 11:27:06+00:00): Actually I am using 'openfietsmap (Benelux)' in combination with Basecamp and a Garmin Edge 800. So yes, Basecamp does use OpenStreetMap in my case.

Anyway the modifications seem to work. I haven't got any routing errors on this map piece in the new 'OpenFietsMap' release (29-08-2015).
M!dgard (2015-08-30 11:31:17+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to explain this.

It seems like a bug in either BaseCamp or the OpenStreetMap to Garmin converter. Splitting a way should not have any effect at all.
schmarn (2015-08-29 09:09:54+00:00): Der Aldi an der Alexanderstraße ist doch neu. Vor einem Jahr war dort zumindest ein großer neuer Parkplatz.
st7 (2015-11-01 13:50:05+00:00): Genau. Der Parkplatz ist dort auch noch. War vor ein paar Tagen dort. Eigentlich war das auch richtig eingetragen.
@conama: Wolltest du die Änderung wieder rückgängig machen?
schmarn (2015-11-01 14:45:17+00:00): Wenn wir da zu zweit sind, reicht mir das als bestätigung. Ich mache den Parkplatz mal wieder rein.
Vincent de Phily (2015-08-28 16:40:16+00:00): Sorry, but given the road layout and your past behavior, I don't belive this. Reverted. Upload a Mapillary photo of the streetsign if you contest this.

Please stop wasting people's time (including your own) with vandalism. If you want to edit OSM there are endless constructive ways to do so. Please communicate : answer changeset discussions, fill in changeset comments, send PMs, go on IRC or the forums, etc.
Conor2000 (2017-06-12 18:48:36+00:00): I am very sorry for what happened. I genuinely believed that the road was called Station Road. I hope that we can make amends and forget about this.
DaveF (2015-08-28 22:44:18+00:00): Do you know what it is now? Still derelict?
rwendland (2015-08-29 09:37:49+00:00): Soon to be demolished I think - they are now partly security fenced, as part of the £110 million RUH North development. Buildings to the south, like the mortuary, are certainly being prepared for demolition.

I'm new to OpenStreetMap, and not sure what should be done when they are demolished.
voschix (2020-03-23 21:21:40+00:00): Regarding way 368010251, this bridge is elevated and the foot/cycleways enter at ground level. There must be elevators or stairs somewhere. Please upgrade the mapping.
eggie (2020-08-02 15:39:04+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Mars-Curaçao (2015-10-04 05:11:36+00:00): Weet je zeker dat de eenrichting verkeer de juiste kant op is?? Volgens mij moeten de pijlen van rechts naar links.
Eric Peetoom (2015-10-04 13:20:17+00:00): Het is een tweerichtings weg heb het veranderd.
Tararan (2015-08-28 17:02:43+00:00): Запутался с этими GPX-треками и Bingами: не знаю, куда тротуар около поликлиники на Уваровском переулке поместить. Он же не на территории поликлиники.
Tararan (2015-08-28 17:05:58+00:00): Может быть, забор поликлиники залезает слишком далеко на восток, или на Bingе переулок слишком широкий.
literan (2015-08-29 09:53:21+00:00): конечно, забор слишком далеко на восток. Поправил. Вы плагином смещений спутниковых снимков в JOSM пользуетесь? очень полезная штука. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Imagery_Offset_Database
literan (2015-08-29 09:53:49+00:00): а GPS треки вблизи высотных домов бесполезны - их "притягивает" к домам
Tararan (2015-09-01 19:09:37+00:00): Спасибо. Плагин смещений тогда уже пытался использовать, но ближайшие смещения — на соседнем крупном перекрёстке или дальше. Наверное, лучше по ближайшему нарисованному настраивать. Не двигать же всё это по Bing?
Tararan (2015-09-01 19:11:29+00:00): Или это новая функция, и предлагается создавать новые смещения по GPX?
Tararan (2015-09-01 19:19:17+00:00): Нашёл на форуме https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Imagery_Offset_Database/Quick_Start потом почитаю
literan (2015-09-01 21:50:27+00:00): да смещения уже есть, новый снимок неплохо привязан, по Москве расхождение не больше 1 м, пользуйтесь плагином
naoliv (2015-08-28 17:49:43+00:00): Erik, o nome da árvore não deveria ser o nome popular. Pode-se colocar o gênero dela (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus) como genus=Caesalpinia ou a espécie (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species) como species=Caesalpinia pluviosa
Se usar species não precisa colocar genus.
Erik Melo (2015-08-28 18:11:08+00:00): na vdd, tava fazendo um teste pra ver como funciona o site... e como ficaria visível ao público depois de editado, futuramente colocarei as informações corretas
jumbanho (2015-08-29 00:38:51+00:00): Welcome to Openstreetmap and thanks for helping with the map! If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Nakaner (2015-09-11 07:25:45+00:00): Warum hast du in diesem Änderungssatz den Bahnsteig 3/4 in Leipzig Messe gelöscht?
Nakaner (2015-09-11 07:27:55+00:00): Löschen heißt in diesem Fall, das Entfernen von public_transport=platform und railway=platform. Wenn du anschließend ein Multipolygon erstellt hättest und das dann in die Routenrelationen aufgenommen hättest, gäbe es für mich daran auch keinen Anlass zur Kritik.
Nakaner (2015-09-11 07:31:02+00:00): Sorry, ich nehme das eben geschriebene zurück. Das stimmt einfach nicht. Ich bitte um Entschuldigung.
Nakaner (2015-09-11 07:32:32+00:00): Wenn du aber Bahnsteige auf Multipolygone umstellst, musst du in allen Routenrelationen, die den Bahnsteig referenzieren, die einzelnen Umring-Ways des Bahnsteigs durch das Multipolygon ersetzen.
zimba (2015-08-28 19:36:04+00:00): Hallo,

da sind jetzt zwei separate restaurants eingetragen, passt das so? ausserdem sollten sich die gebaeudeumrisse nicht ueberschneiden.

lg
Nakaner (2015-08-29 09:59:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33660344 (Die Verwendung meines Reparatur-Accounts soll nicht heißen, dass ich hier etwas revertiert habe. Ich war schlicht und einfach damit gerade eingeloggt) Am 12. oder 13. Dezember können wir die Strecke umtaggen, aber jetzt noch nicht.
zimba (2015-08-28 19:40:06+00:00): Wenn du die Note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/423558 angelegt hast, kannst du sie jetzt schliessen.
zimba (2015-08-28 19:33:50+00:00): Hallo,

Einige bemerkungen zu diesem changeset:
1) Bitte keine so generischen namen wie "Klostermauer" eintragen, das ist ausm kontext eh klar.
2) Die stromleitung ist eine "power=minor_line", "power=line" sind die grossen.
3) Die masten der stromleitung sind als "power=pole" zu taggen.

Habe das alles schon korrigiert.
lg
zimba (2015-08-28 19:42:49+00:00): Da gebaeude fast immer rechtwinklig sind, nach dem eintragen bitte die funktion zum rechtwinklig machen von polygonen verwenden (bei iD der shortcut 'S'), dann schaut das ganze sauberer aus. lg
wilda17 (2015-08-31 12:10:12+00:00): danke für die info. habe das nachgebessert. lg
zimba (2015-09-01 12:37:47+00:00): Super, danke!
flaimo (2015-08-31 20:14:11+00:00): Existiert die Haunummer 7-9 wirklich so vor Ort? Laut offiziellen Datenbestand gibt es nur die Hausnummer 7 (und die ist auch bereits auf dem Gebäude). Auf die Angaben auf POI-Homepages kann man sich leider nicht verlassen.
dromedar61 (2015-08-31 20:25:12+00:00): Laut der firmeneigenen Website ist es 7-9:
http://holis-market.at/
flaimo (2015-08-31 20:56:36+00:00): Ja das heißt leider nix. Laut http://www.regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_anzeigen?job_ids=21812&ausgabefarbig=true&linktyp=osmkartevoll&unterdrueckfertigestrassen=nein&unterdrueckspalten=nein&land=%C3%96sterreich&stadt=Linz gibt es 7-9 nicht. Ich mach mal einen Kartenfehler auf, dass dies vor Ort geprüft werden muss.
maraf24 (2015-08-30 09:50:56+00:00): Ta zmiana jest błędna, poprzednie oznaczenie było poprawne.
Proszę czytać wiki.
Robin007 (2015-09-07 12:51:37+00:00): Proszę jeszcze o weryfikację ścieżki w kierunku Kozanowa (przedłużenie tej tu omawianej) od ulicy Białowieskiej do np. Zajęczej. Konstrukcja ścieżki jak też oznakowane jako tej tu omawianej a na OSM oznaczona jest jako ścieżka rowerowa.
eggie (2025-02-26 21:35:46+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
maraf24 (2015-08-30 09:53:36+00:00): Wycofane.
naoliv (2015-08-28 22:21:13+00:00): plguedes, por favor, tenha mais cuidado com suas edições.
Você alterou de forma bem errada alguns limites administrativos e também um hospital, que acabou tendo highway=secondary.
Não sei se é o caso de você trabalhar com um maior nível de zoom ou trocar de editor, se o P2 não estiver permitindo você diferenciar os objetos, mas precisa ter um pouco mais de atenção nesses casos.
Skippern (2015-09-05 17:27:04+00:00): Ze, voce pode me explicar porque sempre colocando o nome do município em parêntesis quando voce mapeando localidades menores?
maraf24 (2015-08-30 10:13:07+00:00): "Nie tagujemy pod renderer" (proszę wrzucić to do wyszukiwarki).
Jeśli adres dotyczy budynku to ma być na budynku, a nie obok.
maraf24 (2015-08-30 12:44:43+00:00): Proponuję tam, gdzie są wejścia, dać na obrysie budynku węzeł entrance=main, przypisać adres do tego węzła i poprowadzić chodnik od niego do ulicy. Wówczas nawigacja trafi pod drzwi, a oznakowanie będzie w 100% oddawać rzeczywistość.
Robin007 (2015-09-01 08:50:37+00:00): Chodnik jest już na terenie prywatnym, zatem nie wiem czy jest sens dodawać chodnik? Na prywatnych posesjach chyba się tego nie stosuje?
Rozumiem, że do węzeł entrance=main, można przypisać kilka adresów?
I co w wypadku jak nie będzie chodnika?
maraf24 (2015-09-01 16:19:10+00:00): To, czy teren jest prywatny czy publiczny nie ma w osm znaczenia. 
Teoretycznie można przypisać więcej niż jeden adres do jednego węzła, ale na tej mapie dodatkowe adresy się nie wyświetlą.
Jeśli jest jedno wejście, to wystarczą adresy dać w obrysie budynku. Wejście i drogę do niego prowadzącą można dodać, ale nie trzeba.
zimba (2015-08-28 22:13:38+00:00): spitzen sache
RafalR (2017-03-09 18:15:12+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczasz cały budynek jako budynek straży pożarnej gdy tylko część budynku jest remizą. Jest tu jeszcze np apteka.
Jojo4u (2015-10-02 20:43:29+00:00): Ich glaube die Relation beim Medienzentrum verkompliziert die Sache nur. Gibt es eine Anwendung die zzt. damit besser funktioniert? So ist jetzt vieles doppelt getaggt.

LG Joachim