piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-08-04 21:06:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-08-04 21:32:09+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast anders rendert er straks niets in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-04 21:09:53+00:00): Bij een winkel hoort een shop tag
bv shop=gift  of bakery
Kijk in de wiki voor de shop tags.
store =  niet de goede tagging.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-04 21:10:37+00:00): de naam van de winkel heeft de tag name= De Oude Winkel nodig
rivermont (2020-05-26 21:29:50+00:00): Please be more careful when you are editing. I'm not sure how but you managed to leave a bunch of parking aisles disconnected from the rest of the map, and whatever imagery you traced on was offset from everything else.
agft4271 (2020-05-26 21:39:03+00:00): I’m sorry, but I was barely starting to get used to osm. Also, about the imagery, I was using Mapbox imagery, also because there is no exact imagery to use on osm, you can use whatever imagery you, (and everyone else) would like.
rivermont (2020-05-26 22:12:54+00:00): There is no "exact imagery" anywhere, but some layers are more accurate than others. The Mapbox layer that is available here is I think from about 2010, and is very outdated and not aligned very well. Esri (not Clarity) is generally the most reliable as they seem to orthorectify everywhere to some extent.

Using older imagery causes problems when things are built or destroyed and it's not obvious which is correct.

When there's an obvious difference in the alignment between an imagery layer and another or the data, all editors (can't speak for GoMap) have an 'Imagery Alignment' feature for lining them up, so even inaccurate layers can be traced on once they're aligned.
agft4271 (2020-05-27 00:43:45+00:00): I now normally use NC Latest orthoimagery, which I think is the best at alignment, but since Maxar just updated their imagery, I double check with maxar. Anyways, thanks again! Also, GoMap does not have an imagery offset feature, which is why I now use NC Orthoimagery.
rbowall (2019-08-04 21:05:49+00:00): There is also a footpath heading north from this bridleway half way along. I'll add it as an issue as soon as the edit becomes live and visible.
eggie (2019-08-04 21:37:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het adres is al aanwezig op de adresnode van het Kadaster. Svp niet nogmaals op de omtrek van het gebouw een adres toevoegen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-04 21:42:53+00:00): Op de adresnode staat de naam ook al vermeld + status van het huis historic=caste?   Klopt dat wel?
eggie (2019-08-04 21:45:57+00:00): historic=castle
castle_type=stately
>

Kijk even in de wiki onder castle svp..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle

en 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:castle_type

Alle info komt nu dubbel voor.
Le Comptoir des Pierres (2020-02-09 11:22:29+00:00): Bonjour, 
Cette entreprise a déménagé au 42 route nationale 74, 21700 Comblanchien
ps : je suis le gérant de cette entreprise
Merci par avance
Thibaut REMY
user_5359 (2019-08-05 14:10:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
eggie (2019-08-05 09:14:13+00:00): Tag Angela... Auch in Deutschland ist es nicht üblich um bicycle=designated zu "taggen" auf Radwege.
Nur auf highway=path is das erwünscht.
Erkundigen Sie sich mahl auf dem Deutschen Forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Grüss.
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-05 09:36:35+00:00): Nochmahls nachgesehen. ..

Anscheinend gibts jedoch ein Unterschied zwischen Hollandiche "tagging" und die Deutsche

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Verwirrend!
Gr Eggie
NGL-engel (2019-08-07 15:27:52+00:00): Hallo Eggie
Du hast recht, hier steht es auch noch einmal. Aber verstehen tue ich es auch nicht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany 
Tja, in den Niederlanden ist es auf den zweiten Blick doch oft anders. 
Zumal man die Radwege hier, wenn man sie mit den Niederländischen vergleicht, nicht mal Radwege nennen dürfte. Erstes sind sie sehr schmal, und zweitens oft in einem so schlechten Zustand das man (zumindest wenn man ein wenig schneller fährt) diese gar nicht benutzen kann. Aber ein "tagging" auf der man die Höchstgeschwindigkeit auf Radwegen eintragen kann - vielleicht ist das doch ein wenig zu übertrieben ;-)
Gruß
    Angela
oba510 (2019-08-05 03:29:15+00:00): Are you sure about the current name? When I passed here on Friday the new sign said "Tasty Wok". A week before there was a hand-written sign in the window that said "[something] Bowl" with the word Bowl crossed out and replaced with "Wok".
andeux (2019-08-10 17:53:07+00:00): I walked by this week. The website says MalaZui Tasty Bowl, there is a sign in the window that says Tasty Pot, and the big sign above the door says Tasty Wok. So no, I'm not sure.
eggie (2019-08-05 06:56:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
tosky (2019-08-05 07:52:39+00:00): Hi! This point is not needed, because the entire hospital area is correctly marked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24623368#map=17/38.10471/13.36053&layers=D

Can you please remove it? Or I will do it in the next days.
letihu (2021-02-15 19:54:39+00:00): Hier fehlen noch tags
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710744082/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710744079/history#map=19/51.05025/9.26684&layers=N
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710744089/history
PT-53 (2019-08-11 07:39:23+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
nach Deinen Ergänzungen wird in keep right für diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710716344/history
ein Hinweis "Straße-Straße, Way 710716344" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=113307746
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-19 15:57:12+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
user_5359 (2019-08-05 13:58:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If this a car dealer, please add shop=car also.
Allison P (2021-08-04 17:38:29+00:00): Is this service road really called Service Road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710760676#map=18/39.81950/-104.74976
Your Village Maps (2021-08-04 19:27:17+00:00): No, I don't think so. I don't even remember seeing this. But I will double-check to be safe.
Your Village Maps (2021-08-04 21:33:45+00:00): As Gaylord Rockies is a very recent development, it definitely could use some improved mapping; and more development around it is occurring now and will continue for some years I am sure.

It looks like this is a "service road" or "access road" to the back side of the convention center (not for guests, tourists, people attending conventions there) for employees, etc. So maybe it *should* have Service Road for its name? I will look into it further and see if that makes sense or not.
Allison P (2021-08-04 22:07:52+00:00): The name tag is for names, not descriptions. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
Your Village Maps (2021-08-05 00:22:06+00:00): I'm thinking that maybe there is a sign that actually says "Service Road".

I'd have to check street view (I doubt it exists) or visit in person...if I can even get there...look like there are lift gates)
Allison P (2021-08-05 00:30:45+00:00): Even still, that doesn't indicate that's the name. Could just be a descriptive sign.
Allison P (2023-10-29 03:17:27+00:00): Coming back to this (as I see the name is still there) I see this name is definitely wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710765977
Your Village Maps (2023-10-29 20:55:22+00:00): I will remove the name tags from the tennis courts and basketball court. By the way, why isn't the hotel building rendering anymore?? I will contact the last person who edited it.
Allison P (2023-10-29 21:15:18+00:00): Members of the multipolygon are touching each other, which is invalid. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492440869 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492440734.

Doesn't make sense to have a building way as an outer way for a building multipolygon. The issue is that types are being mixed up (a single relation has features of both type=building and type=multipolygon. I will fix.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-11 11:53:45+00:00): Note that such relations are not needed. Any data in OSM is geocoded, relations such as "Cities in Russia" or "Motorways in China" or "Trees in Poland" should not be created.

It is enough to map borders or country (or other regions) and map objects at their correct locations.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
mistergoodnight (2019-08-05 17:33:53+00:00): Beim footway über die Brücke fehlen die tags bridge=yes und layer=1
user_469696 (2019-08-05 18:58:07+00:00): thx
Dimacn (2019-08-11 17:43:56+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите.
Dimacn (2019-08-26 06:49:57+00:00): Данный парк удалён. Причина: не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park
Dimacn (2019-08-11 17:42:47+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите.
Dimacn (2019-08-26 06:50:05+00:00): Данный парк удалён. Причина: не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park
skyper (2019-08-11 20:40:17+00:00): Bitte nicht Fahrräder von der normalen Fahrspur ausschließen nur weil daneben ein Radstreifen/-weg existiert. Fahrräder durfen zB zum Überholen durch aus die normale Fahrspur benutzen.
dddos (2019-08-11 23:27:35+00:00): Habe nur gemäß dem von Dir selbst kürzlich zitierten Wiki-Eintrag gehandelt, der im gegebenen Beispiel ebenfalls die entsprechende Fahrzeugspur als für Fahrräder gesperrt darstellt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lanes#Kreuzung_mit_einer_f%C3%BCr_Fahrr%C3%A4der_ausgewiesenen_Spur
skyper (2019-08-13 19:42:31+00:00): Oh je, fast alle Beispiele im Wiki sind noch von dem uralten [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Suffix_both_ways](proposal).
 Sorry, dieses Beispiel ist, was 'bicycle:lanes' an geht, falsch.

Habe nur Beispiel B1 unter:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
gefunden, was richtig ist.
skyper (2019-08-13 20:13:23+00:00): Link zu Proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Suffix_both_ways
dddos (2019-08-17 22:06:05+00:00): Ich wäre vorsichtig, von "falsch" zu reden. Wer bestimmt das?! Ich ändere ab - und damit Schluss, denn es ändert nix am Routing.
skyper (2019-08-26 13:30:11+00:00): "bicycle=no" und und "bicycle:lanes=*|no*" schließen in D Fahrräder komplett aus von der Benutzung des Weges / der Spur. Da es viele unterschiedliche Ausnahmen in der StVO gibt (Überholen, Versperrt, Verschmutzt/nicht von Schnee Geräumt, Critical Mass), ist "no" falsch.

Analog zu "use_sidepath" könnte über "use_ sidelane" nachgedacht werden, wenn "yes" zu allgemein ist, allerdings ist durch "bicycle:lanes=*|designated*" in D schon die Benutzungspflicht enthalten.
5m4u9 (2019-08-08 05:29:34+00:00): hola, la información privada de tus familiares no es necesaria en el mapa OpenStreetMap, utilizar la opción "favoritos" o "marcadores" de mapsme
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-18 01:44:05+00:00): Hi Jason, thanks for your edits. Just a note, I noticed you added name="Humboldt R Center" to many of the elements within the actual recreation center. Generally you want to reserve the name tag for the name of the element itself, which most of these don't have. Instead you can put it in the operator tag. Also generally you shouldn't use abbreviations. Learn more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Jason Olshefsky (2022-08-23 15:04:23+00:00): Thanks for the notes. I'll keep that in mind. FYI, the city decided to call them "R-Centers" from "Recreation Centers", much to my dismay...
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 19:15:47+00:00): No "overhaul" at all. Just a massive deletion of small islands, and a mechanical removal of source=PGS tags. 
Reverted in 82225732
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Alhamdulillah (2019-10-06 21:11:06+00:00): Please be careful and don't destroy multipolygons: That's what you've done to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1377483 !
mariotomo (2020-01-07 20:05:28+00:00): hola.  cambiaste un 'waterway:river' en que entran otros waterway:river y lo hiciste waterway:stream.  esto no puede ser correcto: o hay que cambiar todos los que entran en él, o dejarlo como river.
mariotomo (2020-01-07 20:06:59+00:00): ah, no, no uno: varios.
mariotomo (2020-01-07 20:22:41+00:00): el error que mencionas detectado por osmose, creo que no lo corregiste, pues siguen sin estar conectados.  estoy mejorandolo yo.
Alvarado2510 (2020-01-18 13:32:02+00:00): Buen día Mario, si es correcto, el editor anterior tiene un desorden en el río Sagui, el día que trate de corregirle, se me a abo el tiempo y no pude terminar la corrección, por eso te encontraste eso así, hoy procedí a finalizar, espero tus comentario haber como quedo.
viloan (2019-08-05 01:15:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003141 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003129 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
mapper377 (2019-08-05 02:09:58+00:00): Forgot to add "Survey date 2019-08-04." to the changes comment.
gurglypipe (2019-08-13 05:34:43+00:00): Is Gill Beck really in a culvert all the way from the upland area? I’m not sure it should have level=-1 for such a distance.

What’s the reasoning for deleting two other streams?
Softgrow (2019-08-16 06:31:25+00:00): Gill Beck was meant to be level=-1 just under the bridge. I've fixed that. Way 512807079 from my (Bing) armchair seems to be combination of path, stone wall and hedge but not a stream. Similarly way 61105718 seems to be a track and a fence (or paddock boundary) with trees.
gurglypipe (2019-08-19 10:12:45+00:00): Thanks for fixing Gill Beck. I’m not sure armchair mapping deleting streams is a good idea. Streams in this area of the country can be small, hidden right next to other features (walls, fences), and intermittent.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-05 01:59:59+00:00): Hello,
As other mappers have already asked, please do not change driveways to footways, these edits are incorrect and will be removed.
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003100 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003064 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003034 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-05 02:44:45+00:00): Nice to see that you're putting your own words into practice here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/c4ukz4/osm_question_will_changing_a_roads_path_influence/eryhz9l/?context=3
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73002968 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
freebeer (2019-08-05 03:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73002905 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism.  this time it's personal.  dwg has been notified.
DETHBR (2019-08-05 03:06:05+00:00): Must have gotten pretty bad then since you like stalking huh?
freebeer (2019-08-05 15:55:02+00:00): given your recent change in username but most importantly, the changeset comments in the past hours you have made, i will cautiously welcome you to the club of productive and correct mappers.

of course, i will be reviewing these, but i hope to be able to offer constructive input to improve the map, rathr than getting involved in meaninggless edit wars.

then maybe like with so many others, i can lose my interest in stalking you personally, and return to stalking amazon logistics.

map well, and be well.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-05 11:12:02+00:00): Hi lionelson, welcome to OSM.

Is this an import of a tree dataset? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73004432

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-05 05:40:23+00:00): Hi and thanks for your recent addition to OSM!

I hope you don't mind, but I took a couple of minutes out to add a bit more detail to the park, as well as a few missing streets that were close by (they're now tagged with fixme=name) - you wouldn't happen to know any of their names, would you?

Thanks and happy mapping :)
woodpeck (2019-08-09 08:26:51+00:00): Ich habe hier eine Changeset-Diskussion entfernt, die nichts mit den konkreten Edits zu tun hatte, sondern sich in allgemeinen Verdächtigungen und Anschuldigungen erschöpfte.
martingggg (2020-08-14 21:26:36+00:00): ponerle nombre al museo + una descripcion àra no considerarlo fake
Leno$M (2020-08-15 04:02:36+00:00): Hola marting. Ya edité el museo en cuestión como te comenté por mensaje directo. Además de cargar otros datos en la zona que tenía olvidados.
Personalmente, no conozco con seguridad los detalles de este "Museo de la estación" pero si se que existe. Mañana contacto con los vecinos con quienes cargué los Puntos de Interés para que me cuenten un poco más. ¡Gracias por el interés!
martingggg (2020-08-15 18:49:22+00:00): joyas Leno. 
Lo que le pasa a los museos chicos es que no tienen a nadie que les haga una paginita ni en facebook.
Y, por otro lado, hay mucha gente que le mete la etiqueta museum a otras cosas, entonces me la paso revisando y no tengo elementos para considerarlo museo...

A veces, no pocas, saco la etiqueta hasta que no aporten mas datos.

gracias por ayudarnos en #osmglam !
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Cultura/GLAM
PT-53 (2019-08-18 09:33:09+00:00): Hallo jojokant,
ist diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274213944/history#map=18/47.89676/8.27748&layers=N
wirklich auf der gesamten Länge gesperrt?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-25 12:42:21+00:00): Hallo jojokant, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
jojokant (2019-08-29 21:43:17+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
die Straße zwischen Tankanlage und der L 182 ist tatsächlich mit zwei Schranken für den allgemeinen Verkehr gesperrt. Die Straße ist auf ihrer gesamten Länge heute nur als Betriebszufahrt zur Tankanlage und für forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr nutzbar. Von der L 182 bis zur Schranke ist es ein öffentlicher Weg und frei zugänglich. Dort befindet sich ja ein Hochbehälter der Trinkwasserversorgung von Rötenbach.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jojokant
PT-53 (2019-08-30 06:22:33+00:00): Dann wäre doch access=private;agricultaral passender als access=no.
Falls Fußgänger und Radfahrer doch durch dürfen dann wäre motor_vehicle=private;agricultaral  noch besser.
An die Schranken sollten die gleichen Access_Markmaler wie am Weg ergänzt werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
jojokant (2019-09-05 07:30:01+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
deine Vorschläge habe ich soweit berücksichtigt und geändert.
Gruß jojokant
Sowa1980 (2019-08-22 17:34:11+00:00): Недопустимый источник данный, буду настаивать на откате эти данных, и если это не прекратиться на блокировке Вас.
bdiscoe (2019-08-05 06:32:59+00:00): Actually the source was mostly Maxar, as it seems to be more recent than Bing here
grabtaxi17 (2019-11-25 06:44:40+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is:https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/33
grabtaxi17 (2019-11-25 06:48:44+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is:https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/33
grabtaxi17 (2019-11-25 06:44:32+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is:https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/33
Peter Vojtek (2019-08-31 12:45:50+00:00): MartorCz, zaujimalo by ma, preco si zmazal tento pramen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300799058/history

vyzera takto:

https://www.freemap.sk/?map=16/48.603822/17.989812&layers=XI&tool=gallery&image=162207&changesets-days=14

takze som ho znovu vratil na mapu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6761498024#map=16/48.6057/17.9925
MartorCZ (2019-09-10 06:40:34+00:00): Dobrý den, pracuju pro Mapy.cz a jeden uživatel nám napsal toto: ,,Studnička je rozbitá a už v nej nie je pitná voda. Len stojatá." Proto jsem ji zrušil, aby někdo nečekal, že zde najde nezávadnou vodu. Jaký je váš návrh, jak to vyřešit? Díky
kayle (2019-09-11 08:10:46+00:00): Zdravím, no ale natural=spring je prameň. Neznamená to automaticky že to je aj pitná voda.
Viď. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural%3Dspring
Tam stačilo len zmeniť tag drinking_water=no
Takto je explicitne dané, že to nie je pitná voda.
Iné pramene bez drinking_water by som tiež považoval za nepitné (nakoľko nie je uvedené, že sú pitné), a samozrejme tie s drinking_water=yes za pitné.
MartorCZ (2019-09-11 09:56:26+00:00): OK, máte pravdu, smazat ji je asi moc. Přidejte tag drinking_water=no a do poznámky, že je poškozena. Díky
Peter Vojtek (2019-09-11 10:19:31+00:00): ja by som tagy nechal tak, ako su.

to ci je voda pitna alebo nie povedat nevieme. teraz v lete v nej voda stala, ale na jar mozno cez nu voda tecie a v takom pripade by som sa kludne napil.

poskodena ta studnicka podla mna nie.
kayle (2019-09-11 11:03:57+00:00): No pokiaľ nevieme povedať či je/nie je pitná by som nedával tag. Či?
Nemusia byť hneď životu nebezpečné, ale úplne nezávadné tiež nemusia byť.
Peter Vojtek (2019-09-11 11:06:23+00:00): teraz tam tam ziaden `drinking_water` tag nie (a navrhujem nech to tak aj ostane): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6761498024#map=16/48.6057/17.9925
kayle (2019-09-12 05:19:10+00:00): Aha, ok. Uz som ticho. :)
Kostik (2019-08-05 16:33:45+00:00): The name tag is a must.
december1988 (2020-04-07 05:28:43+00:00): Изменился адрес организации, новый адрес: г. Нижний Новгород, ул Мончегорская, д. 3/3
PT-53 (2019-08-05 15:38:08+00:00): Hallo Kurt34,
was ist ein generischer Pfad:
Grüße
grabtaxi17 (2019-11-25 06:44:25+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is:https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/33