piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StC (2022-08-19 21:01:26+00:00): Bonjour,

en supprimant un nœud pour le remplacer par un autre sans les mêmes tags, ce changeset a cassé deux relations de randonnée : 14462862 et 14462863. Voir https://knooppuntnet.nl pour détecter ce type de problème. Je me charge de la correction.

Cordialement,
St.
Patchi (2022-08-20 06:25:12+00:00): Bonjour StC,

Merci pour ton retour. Effectivement ne voulant pas modifier le nœud avec le tag network:type=node_network, mais voulant ajuster la géographie des voies (car pas alignées sur la carte IGN récente), j'ai laissé ce nœud seul (d'ailleurs il https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5004365256 existe toujours et devrait être supprimé à mon humble avis - car tu as déjà corrigé avec un nouveau nœud).
Maintenant je comprends l'origine des node_network dans la région et je ferais attention pour les prochaines modifications.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
StC (2022-08-21 08:01:07+00:00): Bonjour ! Je croyais avoir vu que le nœud avait été détruit, j'avais mal regardé. Je m'en occupe.
kepivar (2022-08-24 21:36:47+00:00): Does SIM stand for "Soudan Interior Mission"?
Dylley (2022-08-25 09:29:22+00:00): It used to stand for that and some people still know them as that. But for several decades the official name has been just the acronym SIM. See the statement on their website. https://www.sim.org/faq#question6
abakus_uploader (2022-08-19 22:31:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_6110846 (2022-08-19 13:14:45+00:00): перейменування з телеграм канал Декомунізація. Україна
mueschel (2022-08-26 09:31:16+00:00): Hi,
please check this import. There are 59 POIs with "recycling:beverage_carton". The common tag is "recycling:beverage_cartons". Could you check & fix that?
merylstreet_semibot (2022-08-26 10:03:18+00:00): Hi mueschel, 
You are right, my bad! 
I will get on it next week and message you back once done. Thanks for the check.
merylstreet_semibot (2022-09-05 12:41:05+00:00): Hi mueschel,
I have just updated all 58 POIs using JOSM on this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125813615

I saw the 59th one is from someone else, I updated it separately and manually.
literan (2022-08-23 20:56:48+00:00): это не названия
sdfadsfdsafasd (2022-08-23 21:27:35+00:00): ну такие уж вывески)
literan (2022-08-24 10:45:45+00:00): но в поле "название" вносится не текст вывески (там может быть все, что угодно), а название заведения. 

Оно обычно указано на табличке у входа, либо на стенде внутри. Или можно спросить у продавцов. Бывает, у мелких точек, вовсе названия нет.
eggie (2022-08-20 08:26:17+00:00): Hi Robert.. 

You asked for feedback.
No unit a, b, c? 
Funny.. There is no Pelmolenlaan 1 in the Dutch Registry present, but the website tells us this very address is okay.

Greetz,
eggie
Robert2505 (2022-08-20 08:47:00+00:00): Hello Eggie,

Thank you for your comment.
I asked for feedback because this exact thing looked weird to me.

I work at another office, I'll ask someone next monday.

Take care.
Robert2505 (2022-09-16 12:19:52+00:00): Hey Eggie,

Sorry it took a few weeks.
We pulled up the lease contract, hoping we could clear it up.

It just says number 1, level 3.
I added the last part, but that's about all I can do about this :(
Sylv1_Durif (2022-08-19 16:42:36+00:00): Ouch that a big zone!
user_15723033 (2022-08-19 16:52:16+00:00): Yep! It's pretty normal over here.
MxxCon (2022-08-20 04:34:11+00:00): That's not normal.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125107892
limes11 (2022-08-21 02:45:14+00:00): Please check your edits. You had already added these access-tags in the Netherlands four months ago and they got reverted. 

They are a) superfluous and b) should never be in the same changeset as similar edits in the US.
user_15723033 (2022-08-21 16:25:47+00:00): Alright, I was not aware of how this works.
Geim (2022-09-13 18:38:07+00:00): Waarom map je zoveel 
cycleway:both=no? Over het algemeen wordt alleen de "yes" situatie gemapt en alleen de "no" situatie als het iets toevoegt, bijvoorbeeld oneway=no als het fietspad aan de linker kant van de weg lig.
Er is heel veel no, zo zou je ook b.v. op elk weg zonder lantarenpalen lit=no kunnen zetten, of swimming_pool=no 
cycleway:both=no voegt m.i. niets toe aan de kaart
Langlaeufer (2022-08-19 14:55:30+00:00): Nein, der Radweg ist nicht benutzungspflichtig (nicht beschildert - weil tempo 30 Zone) - daher nur bicycle=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125108037
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
highflyer74 (2022-08-20 06:43:20+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier ist ein wenig etwas schief gegangen, da es jetzt überlappende Geometrien und eine neue Multipolygon Relation gibt, die nicht nötig und defekt ist.

Da ich davon ausgehe, dass das aus Versehen entstanden ist, kurz die Frage: was wolltest du denn genau anpassen?

Ich repariere das eben und dann kannst du ja gucken, ob alles so ist, wie es sein soll.

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2022-08-20 07:27:29+00:00): Kurzes Update: ich hab's repariert. Ein Hinweis noch: leider lebst du in einem Gebiet, welches in OSM technisch gesehen sehr schlecht gemappt ist. Das Hauptproblem sind Landflächen, welche mit Wegen "verklebt" wurden. Dies macht es sehr schwer im Nachhinein noch Dinge zu ändern. Deshalb nimm dir das bitte nicht als gutes Beispiel. Wir halten Wege und Landflächen meist getrennt. Landflächen untereinander können (und sollten) verbunden werden, sofern sie auch in Wirklichkeit aneinander grenzen.

Im Nachhinein habe ich gesehen, dass durch deine Änderung vier Multipolygon Relationen entstanden sind (siehe unten unter Relationen). Ich weiß nicht, ob es am Editor oder einer bestimmten Art des Editierens deinerseits liegt, aber diese Relationen sind nicht notwendig.

Im Prinzip funktioniert es ganz einfach: entweder man nimmt vorhandene Dinge und passt sie in ihrer Form an (Stichwort Form: Gebäude bitte mit der Taste "q" rechtwinklig machen), oder man fügt neues hinzu und muss dafür ggf alte Dinge auftrennen. Es sollte nicht zu Überlappungen kommen. Auch Adressen werden nur einmal (normalerweise am Hauptgebäude) erfasst.

Ich hoffe, ich habe soweit alles bedacht. Wenn du noch Anmerkungen hast, oder etwas nicht stimmt, schreibe am besten direkt hier im Changeset, dann können wir die Lage gemeinsam verbessern.
user_5359 (2022-08-30 18:07:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1087492495. Please notice admin_level=2 is reserved for a country. the lower level is for bigger object (like a Continents). 
Please correct this value
emersonveenstra (2022-08-23 19:15:45+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution. Please note that phone numbers need to be in the correct format, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage for the correct format. If you wouldn't mind quickly fixing it, that would be appreciated, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125108792
Al Duncanson (2022-08-23 19:25:19+00:00): Ah alright, I'll take care of that.

Thanks!
arletakwiatkowska (2022-08-19 13:52:00+00:00): Thanks for the update
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:52:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay attention to this point:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
Waaslander (2022-08-19 14:00:09+00:00): *Oude Veldstraat
yasslay (2022-08-20 14:57:12+00:00): Hello!

The names and tags you have added to the ways involved in the changeset seem rather dubious. I doubt that an Antiproton Decelerator path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087351986) would be a cycleway...

Kind regards,
AOOSMU
literan (2022-08-23 20:56:19+00:00): вы уверены, что вдоль Ломоносовского отдельные (физически отделенные) велодорожки, а не разделенные пеше/велодорожки? они по-разному отмечаются
muhomor41k (2022-08-25 10:30:31+00:00): Со стороны кампуса велосипедная дорожка отделена газоном, со стороны ЖК и библиотеки исправил
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2022-08-19 17:51:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Ropino (2022-08-21 12:35:29+00:00): Hi, was soll:
"highway=P1.10" bedeuten ?
Die Frage gilt auch für:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125110138
VG
kmpoppe (2024-12-29 07:43:23+00:00): Hi Jon!

With this CS, you changed the (I would guess) closed EAT. into a Pret, but didn't remove the brand:wikipedia tag that still points to the old brand. Can this be removed?

K
cytryn (2022-08-19 16:01:22+00:00): Cześć,
Sposób tagowania paneli dachowych możesz podejrzeć tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solar?uselang=pl#Rooftop_Solar_Panels
Niezależnie od tego, użyłeś kilku tagów wadliwych dla wiaty przystankowej, niekoniecznie dotyczących solarów.
1) area=yes - zbędne
2) covered=yes - wadliwe - oznacza, że coś jest zasłonięte (bo np. znajduje się pod dachem, w tunelu itp.) - w tym przypadku zadaszeni mogą być co najwyżej ludzie na przystanku, a nie sama wiata :)
3) surface=* - wadliwe, bo również nie dotyczy zmapowanego obiektu (wiaty), tylko chodnika.
Pozdrowienia
cytryn (2022-08-19 16:05:17+00:00): Eee, dobra, nieważne. Nie wiem czemu skojarzyło mi się, że to jest amenity=shelter, a to jest przecież highway=platform... Traktuj komentarz powyżej jako niebyły :)
Chociaż to covered może być jednak wątpliwe, jeśli nie jest zadaszony cały obszar przystanku.
rszevski (2022-08-19 16:39:20+00:00): Dzięki za informację. Usunąłem covered=yes, bo jak słusznie zauważyłeś cały obszar przystanku nie jest zadaszony. 
Natomiast po dodaniu: generator:method=photovoltaic zmienia przystanek autobusowy na panel słoneczny, więc pozostawiłem tak jak było wcześniej. W końcu głownie chodzi tutaj o przystanek :)
Allison P (2022-09-14 00:44:58+00:00): Is this an import? If so, where is it documented?
skquinn (2022-09-14 02:20:28+00:00): See the source tag; this is Microsoft's building outlines via MapWithAI.
Allison P (2022-09-14 02:34:15+00:00): There is no blanket approval to add Bing buildings unless they are all manually reviewed. Low quality Bing building imports have been reverted in the past. Are you sure you are manually reviewing these?
skquinn (2022-09-14 02:41:19+00:00): Anything that doesn't obviously match imagery I delete and don't add. Anything that fails JOSM validation (overlapping buildings) I edit as needed, including deleting and redrawing by hand. Are there specific buildings in this changeset that need manual attention that I missed?
Allison P (2022-09-14 03:04:05+00:00): It's a little unclear to me what "manually reviewed" means, but I would guess "all buildings are checked". Just looking at this area (not specifically this changeset, just your edits), that wouldn't include https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505016, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508922, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506032, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505949, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506157, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087509198, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087509208, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508898, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508971, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508647, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508576, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087508983, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087509166, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506208, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505966, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505972, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506158, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505997, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506046, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506146, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087509196, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087506094, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087504759, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505502, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505407, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505282, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505463, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505175. I could go on, but I've made my point. That's a concerningly high error rate. Higher than another editor whose edits were outright reverted.
Carnildo (2022-09-14 04:21:12+00:00): Just looking at the area bounded by Racquet Ridge Road, Racquet Sports Way, and Shady Ace Lane, there are 59 buildings.  Of them, 13 are obviously badly mapped when compared to the Bing imagery, for a 22% error rate.  I consider a 1% error rate the highest tolerable, and would prefer 0.1% or lower.

These are buildings that are incorrectly rotated, are missing large sections, or have improperly-squared corners, not ones that are misaligned.
skquinn (2022-09-14 14:38:25+00:00): I fixed a few of these mentioned plus ones I saw taking a closer look. Apparently the building styles in this subdivision are of the type that specifically trip up the AI and I didn't realize it at first. I'll be more diligent reviewing from now on; I usually catch the most egregious AI burps but these unfortunately got missed.
skquinn (2022-09-14 15:34:44+00:00): I've fixed all the obvious problems I can see in the Racquet Ridge Road/Racquet Sports Way/Shady Ace Lane area. I've also added quite a few buildings that MapWithAI outright missed (arguably an error as well).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-22 16:31:01+00:00): Please don't realign on Bing Maps except if you use this offset in the Montreal area: 0.6,-1.54
This offset was verified using official geodesic data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
MxxCon (2022-08-20 04:36:38+00:00): Hello.
Where is that information from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125111655
swimdb (2022-08-20 22:45:49+00:00): First hand knowledge, I stayed the night there.  They are weird hippies with conspiracy theories about microwave ovens but it is a nice cheap guest house that is clean and functional. 

A few pics here 

https://imgur.com/gallery/nAD53qj
SHARCRASH (2022-08-19 15:03:07+00:00): + MP inner integrations
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 05:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125133469 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 05:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125133469 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 05:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125133469 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
kogutowicz-mano (2022-11-08 05:24:40+00:00): Szia!
Nem power=portal, hanem
power=tower
design=h-frame
user_16178067 (2022-08-19 16:15:47+00:00): Przywracaj tamte zmiany ch*ju i to już!
pio2_122 (2022-08-19 16:21:58+00:00): Piękna prośba o kolejną blokadę twojego konta...

Zmian nie zamierzam przywracać, ponieważ świadomie zignorowałeś swoje dwie poprzednie blokady, gdzie zostałeś jasno poinformowany, że „OSM to projekt społecznościowy i komunikacja z innymi jest konieczna. Do tego sposób mapowania musi być wypracowany zgodnie z konsensusem społeczności.”. Te zmiany nie zostały nigdzie przedyskutowane, więc zostały wycofane.
user_16178067 (2022-08-19 16:15:25+00:00): Przywracaj tamte zmiany ch*ju i to już!
schnips (2022-08-19 19:56:13+00:00): Haallo wurzelast - ja so passts gut. Danke!
mariotomo (2022-08-19 15:38:44+00:00): (so sorry, my mistake: I had forgotten committing a change to "building" 1087236557)
eggie (2022-11-01 20:58:54+00:00): Esri World is totaal verouderd!  Die kun je niet als basis gebruiken is een gebied dat steeds verandert. 

Groet,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
JJIglesias (2022-08-19 17:38:09+00:00): Saludos
Un place=city_block es un area urbana delimitada por 4 calles, NO abarca varias areas iguales.

Los city_blocks NO se colocan en Bolivia a NO ser q tengan una identificacion catastral, y el Mapa NO es un catastro es un mapa logico, para conseguir algo debe tener una identificacion especifica y aceptada oficialmente.

Podrias por favor aclararnos que quieres decir con "Trabajo" en tu comentario. Trabajo de quien o para quien?

Favor leer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity_block
y
https://learnosm.org

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-08-19 17:48:50+00:00): Tu edicion ademas produjo los siguientes errores al mapa:

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway	4
warnings:mismatched_geometry:point_as_vertex	1
warnings:suspicious_name:generic_name	2

Ademas q las vias o elementos No se colocan en Mayusculas sino Capitalizadas
StiltedKiwi (2022-10-31 09:26:06+00:00): Am Elsterwehr und die Mainzer Straße sind mit dem Key:access=no getaggt. Warum?
sjakobi (2022-10-31 17:19:02+00:00): Keine Ahnung. Hab ich nicht geändert.
StiltedKiwi (2022-10-31 17:25:03+00:00): Ok, dann stand es wahrscheinlich vorher schon drin. Als letzter Bearbeiter stehst du drin, deswegen habe ich gefragt. Dann werde ich das ändern.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-24 23:02:47+00:00): Hoi IIVQ,

Klopt de brandweerkazerne op node/9100036294 ? er is er namelijk ook één vlakbij gemapt op node/7024311190.

Mvg, 
Casper
IIVQ (2024-08-25 07:19:49+00:00): Hoi!
Toen ik er langswandelde stond er een splinternieuw gebouw. Ik vermoed dat het oude niet meer in gebruik is, maar dat weet ik niet zeker.

Volgens https://m.facebook.com/story.php/?story_fbid=149129717253337&id=100064689279393 betrof het een verhuizing, maar ik ben er even doorheen gescrolld en weet niet wat de status van het oude gebouw op de dorpsstraat 19 is.
IIVQ (2024-08-25 07:21:50+00:00): Alle kentekenen zijn er vanaf (boven de garagedeur zat het brandweerlogo) dus ik denk dat het nu gewoon een woonhuis is.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/wXcvdkKfwKfVziKA9?g_st=ac
BelKed (2022-08-24 06:42:00+00:00): Ak je adresa súčasťou budovy (čo v tomto prípade je), tak sa nedáva duplicitne aj do bodu POI.
archie (2022-08-19 16:35:52+00:00): Would you please change the maxheight only under the hinder. Not the whole highway. Se wiki. Thanks!
glibbertorsten (2022-08-20 10:32:01+00:00): Hi! I can add a height_restriction, but the way has to be tagged with the maxheight also. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dheight_restrictor
archie (2022-08-20 10:58:16+00:00): Only tag the section of the way where the maxheight road signs apply. If there are none, only the approximate section of the way which is under the bridge should be tagged with maxheight (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight)
glibbertorsten (2022-08-21 14:37:48+00:00): Can't find this sentence in this article...?
glibbertorsten (2022-08-22 05:22:31+00:00): Now I know what yo mean. But in this case its unnecessary for the reason its a dead end.
archie (2022-08-22 05:47:49+00:00): Den Straßenabschnitt, welcher unterhalb der Brücke verläuft aufteilen und mit dem Key maxheight=* ergänzen. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxheight)
RicoElectrico (2022-08-20 21:50:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9964220817/history to chyba miało być description, a nie defibrillator:location:en
charl3s (2022-08-23 08:41:09+00:00): faktycznie, dziwne
eggie (2022-08-19 17:54:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jonrellim (2022-08-20 11:48:15+00:00): Heyy, ik zie dat het bedrijf op het gebouw is getagd, dat was volgens mij al zo dus niet jouw fout. Maar als je er dan toch langs gaat is het denk ik beter als het bedrijf apart als node wordt toegevoegd, vooral hier, omdat zo te zien carglass er ook nog bij in zit. Die heeft overigens nog geen adresgegevens er bij staan. 

goed werk verder en map ze!
Wetterhorn (2022-08-20 16:58:47+00:00): Owh, inderdaad, en de andere twee bedrijven ook een rommeltje, alles gecorrigeerd in changeset 125155473, bedankt voor de feedback!
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2022-08-19 17:56:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Sylvan Rou (2022-08-19 22:01:56+00:00): Hi Eggie, bedankt voor je bericht. Ik ga de links eerdaags eens doornemen.

Groet,
Sylvan
pitfire (2022-08-20 06:19:31+00:00): Hallo wheelmap_visitor,
macht es Dir etwas aus, auch die Regel: Changeset "Kartenbereich/länderspezifisch"
Zoo Atlanta und ein Knoten 370676726, v4 in Deutschland, muß
nicht sein.  
Danke und Gruß pitfire
Helge_Inselmann (2022-10-13 08:20:47+00:00): Hi pitfire, 
ich bin Helge aus dem Wheelmap-Team. Wir wissen, dass diese großen Changesets nervig sind. Wir wollen das unbedingt optimieren, aber es dauert leider länger als geplant. 
Das Problem ist auf unserer To-Do-Liste. Ich bitte dich noch um ein wenig Geduld. 
Viele Grüße 
Helge
L'imaginaire (2022-08-20 09:39:54+00:00): Bedankt om dit te melden. In dergelijke gevallen is het beter om de toegang als privaat aan te duiden, ik heb dit alvast aangepast.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-20 01:03:20+00:00): Why did you delete 'name:ar' from node 2479369793? it is correct, why did you remove it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125117421
highflyer74 (2022-08-23 13:18:30+00:00): Hello!

Can you specify the source of your changes to the many roads' classifications made in this changeset?

Have you been in contact with the Russian community and got an agreement by them before doing this edit?

If not: please do not do these kind of edits. If you do not know the area and are familiar wird local mapping standards / habits: don't do it.

Be so kind to reply inside this changeset. Thank you!