piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 14:50:13+00:00): Hello,
In this change you've changed the tag on e.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=6609662 from highway=cycleway to highway=footway .
Has the infrastructure itself changed since it was first mapped?  Other tags on that way are still consistent with it being a roadside cycleway usable by both cycle and foot traffic.  If that's the case, then the previous tag was likely correct (obviously, as discussed in various other changesets http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=567640 you're in discussion as to whether the way that "everyone else" is mapping these features is correct)
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-08-18 21:11:27+00:00): No reply, so I've changed this back (numerous other similar complaints at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=567640 ).
zvenzzon (2020-11-05 19:36:07+00:00): Misstänker att "Krånglavägen" borde heta Kånglavägen, eftersom det är vägen till Kångla. Det är det enda rimliga. Har aldrig hört talas om "Krångla" men däremot "Kångla" många gånger av byborna.
AndersAndersson (2020-11-05 19:48:09+00:00): Du har högst troligt rätt.
Antingen har jag stavat fel eller så var det fel i NVDB (det var ganska många fel där). Ändra gärna. Lite synd dock, det var ju ett roligt namn :)

Jag såg en annan sak nu, att Kångla står benämnt på LM Topo som Kånglan (med ett n).
Har du lokalkännedom om det också så justera namnet/lägg till alt_name eller gör inget alls om det också är fel. Tänkte när du ändå byter namn på vägarna.
Nakaner (2019-07-20 08:16:20+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für diesen äußerst sinnvollen Edit. Ich bin kurz davor ihn zu revertieren, weil es sich in meinen Augen um einen mechanischen Edit handelt. Beispielsweise hast du bei https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/38626587 die Semikola durch Kommata ersetzt, ohne festzustellen, dass das restliche Taggings des Ways nicht zu traffic_sign=* passt.  Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71525035
Andreas Binder (2019-07-21 16:37:46+00:00): Hi Michael,

eigentlich habe ich nicht nur die fehlerhaften ; in , an den Zusatzschildern wikikonform geändert, sondern auch andere Syntaxfehler im traffic_sign tag (z.B. DE1020-30->1020-30 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444806738/history) und hätte diese Änderung nicht als mechanischen Edit eingestuft. Bei der von Dir erwähnten Straße https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/38626587 würde ich jetzt auch nicht direkt eine Verschlechterung der OSM-Daten durch mich sehen. Wenn Du das anders siehst, wäre das für mich aber auch OK und ich würde den Changeset reverten. Soll ich?

Grüße
Andreas
Nakaner (2019-07-21 19:52:04+00:00): Nein, du brauchst ihn nicht revertieren.
iWowik (2019-06-24 05:52:40+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, соглашение о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696886087
Kai Johnson (2025-12-28 18:05:14+00:00): Hi! We're discussing Historic US Route 80 in the Community forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cleaning-up-historic-us-route-80/139776). Would you be able to help by explaining the original source of the Historic US 80 (CA) relation (https://osm.org/relation/9712655)? Is there a way of verifying which road segments were included/excluded?
SomeoneElse (2019-06-23 11:26:54+00:00): Hello,
I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379996056/history is actually called "Kennet Side cycle path and Kennet and Avon Canal towpath" is it?  I was there a couple of months ago and don't remember any signage to that effect.  That may be a description of what it is, but it's not a name.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for a bit more info.  It's already part of a relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8345184 with that name; any site that wants to render that can do so as per https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=19&lat=51.456099&lon=-0.95412 .
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-06-23 11:37:32+00:00): Actually, looking at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=567640 , it appears that this isn't the first time that exactly this issue has been raised.  You seem to have been in discussion there with a number of people who think you're tagging things incorrectly.  In OSM if lots of people are telling you that you're doing it wrong over a period of several years then perhaps its just possible that their arguments have some merit :)
To try and move forward, it would help everyone if we could understand what sort of changes you're trying to make.  To engage with a wider community than just people who see individual changeset comments I'd suggest joining the https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb mailing list and explaining what your goal is there.
Best Regards,
Andy
AlwynWellington (2019-06-24 07:18:16+00:00): Andy, hi and thank you for considered and considerate mention.

As a result of your mentions I have had another more detailed look at the last several kilometres within Reading: from Bridge Street to Thames River.

When first here, I encountered the name “Kennet Side cycle way” on sections that were not streets, to which I made the addition you note above.  

My more detailed look shows much signage for a shared path (a rondel with a bicycle above a child holding the hand of an older person).  Accordingly, I have deleted any name on sections between London Street and Sidmouth Street and “Kennet Side” from there to Thames River.  I would appreciate your review.

I have also looked at the "atownsend" site and see the point you make.  That site seems to apply only in the UK and Ireland.  My long-distance walking takes me well beyond that area so I need a different solution.  I carry an Android tablet with the relevant app being OSMAnd+: this works off-line.  From experience I prefer to have the name of a recognised route at regular intervals when no other name is relevant, especially away from built up areas.  I can expand on that point if you wish.

I have read the wiki section Name is the name only you refer to above.  I take some refuge in the later part of the last paragraph starting “… however most names were invented at some point … “ and assert the many local users I have seen online will know it locally as the “canal tow path” or similar but may not know the name of the canal itself.  
An analogy for my irregular usage is putting the names of train lines on the OSM website.  For example, Great Western Main Line or South Wales Main Line.  When at Paddington Station I do not recall signage for those names

Kind regards, Alan

PS: My current detailed interest in the K&A arises from an intention to walk from Avonmouth to Woolwich in 2020 (after making more progress / completing Via Francigena – Canterbury to Rome - started in 2018 !!!)
DaveF (2019-07-06 11:44:27+00:00): > From experience I prefer to have the name of a recognised route at regular intervals when no other name is relevant, 

Inventing names to suit personal desires is not acceptable. OSM isn't designed just to suit the individual. 

> "most names were invented at some point"

It is not the purpose of OSM to create those names. It reflects established, verifiable names.

>an intention to walk from Avonmouth to Woolwich in 2020 

Perhaps you should wait until you've walked it before making shot in the dark amendments.
AlwynWellington (2019-07-11 06:26:07+00:00): The quotes are not mine but from the wiki.

I agree, the gold standard is to have a name a regular intervals along a route.  

When a route has been noted, explicitly or implicitly, by others then naming it in OSM is useful to those who come later.  And that is what OSM is all about, users adding their bit of information.

So, nothing is a shot in the dark.  The canal and the current trail are well indicated in online material.

kind regards
aixbrick (2019-06-23 11:35:47+00:00): Hallo,
ist "Pflasterweg" ein offizieller Name? Wie kommst du zur Einstufung highway=unclassified? Das Schild (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.85269210000001&lng=6.199608600000033&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=ODDjit_ARp1xTDBgNPLiHA&x=0.4944654875680722&y=0.504008121415809&zoom=0) spricht für highway=track.
Gruß
bwgirona (2019-06-23 14:55:41+00:00): Also der Weg wird unter den Landwirten so genannt, da er genau zu meiner Obstwiese führt und die Leute die ich brauche einen Straßennamen brauchen dachte ich mir, ich benenne den Weg mal ganz offiziell, damit man den Weg besser zu mir findet. Was Du mit dem anderen meinst weiß ich jetzt nicht, wollte nur den Namen eingeben bis zu meinem Grundstück .  Liebe Grüße
aixbrick (2019-06-23 19:47:43+00:00): Du hast vor 4 Monaten aus highway=track ein highway=service und nun ein highway=unclassified gemacht. Das ist wahrscheinlich durch (versehentliche) Auswahl der Werte im Editor passiert.
Beim Namen bin ich mir unsicher, da dieser offenbar eine lokale Bezeichnung darstellt. Daher habe ich im Forum nachgefragt: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=753369#p753369
aixbrick (2019-06-24 15:22:30+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71565727 habe ich den Weg wieder auf highway=track und name in loc_name (da nur lokale Bezeichnung) geändert.
Constable (2019-07-14 15:53:34+00:00): Ciao, perché hai rimosso l'etichetta natural=wood alla riserva delle Baragge?
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=71525853
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234076656/history
Francoerbi41 (2019-07-14 16:03:20+00:00): Non è opera mia, ha lasciato perplesso anche me ma ho soprasseduto, per il momento.
Ciao
FE
Constable (2019-07-14 16:11:09+00:00): Ciao, come non è opera tua?
al primo link puoi vedere le modifiche alla mappa apportate dal changeset 71525853 (questo che stiamo commentando), se selezioni l'area in verde vedrai che il tag natural=wood è evidenziato in rosso, significa che è stato rimosso tramite questa modifica.
Immagino quindi sia stato rimosso per errore, riesci ad aggiungerlo nuovamente?
grazie
Francoerbi41 (2019-07-14 16:55:04+00:00): Scusa ho risposto frettolosamente senza pensare.
Non ho nessuna difficoltà a rimetterlo ma Il tag Wood mi sembra inappropriato, quella zona è una specie di savana africana con poco bosco inframmezzato.
Forse è meglio scrub. Cosa ne dici?

FE
Constable (2019-07-14 16:58:37+00:00): Ciao, nessun problema.
Ehm, non ho mai avuto modo di girare nella riserva, dalle immagini aeree sembra bene o male quasi tutto terreno coperto da piante, se poi siano vere o propri alberi o arbusti non saprei.
Se, come sembra, conosci la zona, sentiti liberissimo di scegliere il valore che ti sembra meglio adattarsi.
Grazie, ciao!
Francoerbi41 (2019-07-14 17:02:21+00:00): allora metto scrub.
ciao
FE
user_5359 (2019-06-23 15:29:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think the hotel exists in the middle of the street.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-06-23 10:31:06+00:00): JAdson, porque voce deletou essa via que eu criei, se é possível ver nas imagens que ela existe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560518495/history
JadsonCelestino (2019-07-04 19:06:03+00:00): Boa tarde, removi porque ela está com a via normal, mais ela é informal, moro nesta cidade e conheço o local, porque é uma fazenda. Eu removi e esqueci que poderia só ter alterado a via. Então irei só mudar a via, porque ela ficou como se fosse via residencial, mas na verdade é um caminho informal.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 15:28:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 15:34:28+00:00): Dag Robin,
Volgens de BAG van het Kadaster moet het huisnummer 9 zijn. De gebouwen en de daarbij behorende huisnummers worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=117631.765&geometry.y=496666.75992859&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0479100000002700&detailsObjectId=0479010000075459
Als dat niet juist is dan kun je een terugmelding doen zodat het Kadaster de fout gaat herstellen.
iWowik (2019-06-24 21:56:05+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятые соглашения
1) о нумерации домов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr#.D0.90.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.28addr:.3C.2A.3E.3D.2A.29

2) о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать

Пример ваших ошибок: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699176414/history
BCNorwich (2019-06-23 14:12:21+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Requested review, well the allotments were already mapped but lacking a name. I've put the name you supplied onto the existing mapped area. You tagged your feature as area=yes, this tag is not needed as OSM takes any polygon (enclosing outline) as an area.

Because the new outline was duplication of an existing area I've removed it. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Karthoo (2019-06-23 18:28:49+00:00): Welcome! Thank you for your first edits. They look very good already! If you have any questions feel free to ask.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-23 10:26:14+00:00): Hello,
What happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5959100989 here?   It looks from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=5959100989 like some tags including "amenity=vending_machine" disappeared.
Best Regards,
Andy
joe-user (2019-06-23 10:46:33+00:00): Very weird... I'm pretty sure I was editing an Amazon locker IN Bavaria only. This was not supposed to happen. Sorry - can the change in the USA be undone?
SomeoneElse (2019-06-23 10:49:15+00:00): No problem - I'll change the tags back on the USA one.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-23 10:51:56+00:00): OK, that's done now.
joe-user (2019-06-23 10:53:01+00:00): Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-12 06:26:33+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2535136 ?
black_bike (2021-02-12 15:43:41+00:00): Please don't remove these nodes. They are part of the project of mapping Düsseldorf Gaslight. Düsseldorf Gaslight is under heritage protection now. Perhaps it will be under UNESCO World Heritage Protection in the future. These nodes represent lost parts of this heritage and should stay in the database. Fore a more detailed information look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/D%C3%BCsseldorf/Projekte/Gaslaternen, (german only)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-12 16:07:20+00:00): Is there any remaining trace of them?

In general you may want to use OpenHistoricalMap ( https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ ), completely gone objects without trace are out of scope of OSM.
user_5359 (2019-06-23 15:27:03+00:00): Hello! Yes prefix disused: is right. But don't forget to delete the other describing  attributes from the shop. The address isn't part of the shop (is also true for the next shop).
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 15:36:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
XY22 (2019-06-29 15:28:56+00:00): Hallo lesDeux,
mit dem Schlüssel height wird die Höhe eines Gebäude beschreiben. Für die Höhe über dem Meersspiegel wird der Schlüssel ele benutzt.
XY22 (2019-06-29 15:35:21+00:00): Außderm wird das Datum beim Schlüssel start_date im Format JJJJ-MM-TT geschrieben, also 2019-06-19
kartonage (2019-06-23 10:46:48+00:00): Hej kjon,

hast du überprüft ob dieser Arzt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/783980696 an dieser Stelle überhaupt noch existiert? Der Knoten hat seit 9 Jahren keine weiteren Informationen bekommen und wurde das letzte Mal vor 7 Jahren mit wheelchair-no getaggt. 
Auf Mapillary sind klar Bilder auf denen das einst vorhandene Aushangschild am Haus entfernt worden ist.

Schöne Grüße
highflyer74 (2019-06-24 06:12:37+00:00): Hola! Can you please check the tagging of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612317503? It has strange tagging on it. Also the artwork is already mapped. Thank you!
yopaseopor (2019-06-24 08:47:38+00:00): Hi!
This square has been in works for long time (https://www.eixdiari.cat/territori/doc/76586/finalitzen-les-obres-de-restauracio-de-la-placa-de-la-vila-de-vilanova.html)
One of the things you can see they have changed is the marble's base of the sculpture in the middle of the square. I have preserved the old form with cyclelife prefix tags, centered in year. Maybe you would think it is better to remove this "pedestal", but this item is so important in the "life" of the square.
Take a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBBlVBjqmG8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJCtMce7VHU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzyh1xWWHO0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY1jYfZjY14 These are public moments in which the square is the "center" of the action. As you can see, the use of this zone of the square has changed and it is important to keep the historical information about how was the square. For this reason I have kept the info about the year of the change and the old form of the monument.
highflyer74 (2019-06-24 13:03:04+00:00): Hi again and thank you for your reply!

It is perfectly fine if you want to preserve that data. In order to make that data useful to all data users though, you should stick to an established tagging scheme. Establishing a new one does not make sense.

If you need help in finding the proper tag for your purpose, open a discussion in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php or the tagging mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

You might find some info on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or if you need dates there is a proposed feature here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace

Please note that the latter uses dates after the ":" and not in front of it.
user_4493657 (2019-08-18 09:12:24+00:00): Cześć Romano. Dzięki za poprawienie. Mogłeś jednak dać informację, że w miejscu Marketu Piotr i Paweł znajduje się Chiński Market.
kuhni74 (2022-02-13 22:31:50+00:00): der Mast muss einiges höher als 12m sein, schätze über 20m?
kuhni74 (2022-02-14 08:52:22+00:00): Ich konnte nirgends eine klingende Bezeichnung des doch recht auffälligen Senders finden. An der Tür des Technik-Containers steht "Mobilkom" und das Kürzel "N 403". Auf https://www.senderkataster.at/karte ist er eingezeichnet, aber ohne genauere Bezeichnung oder Daten (nur die Sendeleistung und die Mobilfunkprotokolle).
Warin61 (2019-06-24 05:14:23+00:00): Changes to Cherry Flat Rd corrupted admin. boundaries for Bonshaw, Delacombe, Buninyong District and Wendouree District. I have repaired these.
Leon K (2019-06-24 06:09:45+00:00): Thanks for that.  
Once again boundaries connected to roads catch me out.
aseidel (2019-07-02 12:00:02+00:00): Hier ist etwas sehr verquer, bitte nochmal prüfen! Diese Südwest nach Nordost vom Bahnhof über die Schienen Richtung Bilmer Straße verlaufenden Wege existieren so nicht; auch der Pulverweg geht nur bis zur Bleckeder Landstraße, nicht über sie hinaus.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:01:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377926
Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
PT-53 (2019-06-30 12:16:42+00:00): Hallo aquarix,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. diesen Straßenabschnitt mit access=no voll gesperrt.
Wie lange dauert die Baumaßnahme dort etwa? Wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Die B 318 selbst ist gem. Baustelleninformationssystem Bayern ja weiterhin befahrbar.
Fragende Grüße
aquarix (2019-06-30 15:20:28+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
die Straßenabschnitte mit 'access=no' sind nur die kurzen Anschlussstücke von der MB 14 an der ehemaligen Ampel. Wie lange die Baumaßnahme an dieser Stelle dauert, weiß ich nicht genau. Derzeit ist dort der Asphalt abgetragen und als großer Haufen vor Ort gelagert. So lange aber die Fahrrad- Unterführung nicht fertig ist, wird dort nichts weiter passieren.
Die B 318 ist an dieser Stelle zwar nun verschwenkt, aber weiterhin durchgehend befahrbar. Der Anschluss zur MB 14 läuft nun komplett von beiden Seiten über die Bergfeldstraße. Die Kreuzung Fichtholz besteht momentan nur aus einer Einmündung von der Autobahnmeisterei aus zur A 8.
Im Juli soll der Verkehr von der bestehenden B 318 Trasse auf die Neubautrasse umgelegt werden und Ende des Jahres soll die Baumaßnahme mit Aufnahme des 4-streifigen Verkehrs fertig sein.
Quellen:
* https://www.merkur.de/lokales/region-holzkirchen/holzkirchen-ort28831/holzkirchen-stau-ampel-auf-b318-hat-endlich-ausgedient-12420961.html
* https://holzkirchen.blogspot.com/2017/06/b-318-unser-protest-beim-spatenstich.html (Bauplan)
Gruß aquarix
ToniE (2019-06-23 12:00:21+00:00): Hi -ckb-,

marcoSt is working a lot on Flixbus routes. To support his work we have added and configured an analysis of the Flixbus routes (and other 'network' in DE and FR) to PTNA.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/index.html

and

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/

Br
Toni
mueschel (2019-06-25 07:14:44+00:00): Hi,
you're using yhe key 'hedge:type' here.  This wasn't used before. Instead we have many 'hedge=*' . Could you change your tag to the common one?
OneLoneRanger (2019-06-25 10:00:20+00:00): Sure not a problem, there are lots of variants on how to tag these hedges. Using Overpass Turbo there's, 'barrier_type=cornish_hedge', 'hedge=Cornish', 'hedge=Cornish Hedge' & 'hedge_type=cornish' with the Cornwall wiki page suggesting 'barrier_type' which does not follow the naming pattern of other barrier types e.g. barrier=fence with fence_type=*. That's why 'hedge_type='  was used.
mueschel (2019-06-25 11:37:56+00:00): The '_type' suffix mainly exists on rather old tags - on all more recent discussions for new tags in this scheme there was some hesitation because it doesn't give any additional information. 'hedge=*' already tells that it gives detail information.
In any case we should try to use either 'hedge=' or 'hedge_type' but not both.
OneLoneRanger (2019-06-25 13:06:34+00:00): Thank you for cleaning that up, corrections have been made in change set 71599026
ajf3934221 (2019-06-24 06:11:36+00:00): Auf dem Schild steht P5 bzw. P6 warum also nicht als Name belassen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71530476
ghaefele (2019-06-24 08:05:36+00:00): Ich halte mich da, wie schon im Kommentar zum Changeset beschreiben, nur an das OSM Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking 
"Px" ist demnach eindeutig eine Referenz. Wenn allerdings nur der Name gerendert wird, dann ist das ein anderes Problem.
osmviborg (2019-06-23 13:27:18+00:00): Vejbyggeriet er synligt på luftfotos fra april. Jeg har flyttet lidt på vejen. Er der stadig cykelsti langs den "gamle" Storstrømsvej?
FNielsen (2019-06-23 16:37:29+00:00): Jeg checker næste gang jeg er forbi.
FNielsen (2019-06-27 15:08:04+00:00): Cyklestien følger nu den nye vej. Dobbelt-rettet på den nord-vestlig side af Storstrømsvej.
Slutter ved Orehoved Langgade.
osmviborg (2019-06-27 15:34:51+00:00): Tak for hjælpen. Jeg har rettet OSM.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 15:41:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Constable (2019-06-24 13:21:58+00:00): Hi there, drinking water node you deleted was just added 22 days ago; are you sure this one doesn't exist?
what's the reason for your deletion?
thanks