piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 14:41:22+00:00): Det är en offentlig plats, husen är namngivna med skyltar. Namnen används som beskrivningar. "Maten serveras i Stora Societetshuset".

Du får gärna förbättra kartan. Vet du att namnet eller huset är historiskt så tagga på.

Men du kanske kan låta bli att ta bort information på grund av några löjliga taggningsregler i wikin som ändras lite då och då. Jag gissar att det var hela orsaken till din kommentar.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60000545
dudka (2019-12-14 13:35:24+00:00): виправлю адресу ректорату КНУ, в цьому ченджсеті щось наплутано
mosstreet (2018-06-20 18:09:06+00:00): Для частных компаний есть обозначение, выбираете, точка, тег частная компания, поправьте иначе ваша правка будет приведена в норму.
viloan (2018-06-20 01:37:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2018-06-20 05:21:17+00:00): Tori,
The view point isn't accessible from any trail or highway. Is it in the correct place? Also, when you make wide spread edits, it is a good idea to upload after each area is done.
Carnildo (2018-06-20 08:11:36+00:00): Glassman, Tori B is editing with Maps.me.  From what I understand of how the program works, they've got no control over how often or how much they upload at any given time.
eggie (2018-06-20 05:30:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-20 05:32:18+00:00): Een maxspeed vn 30km/u hoort niet op een voetpad. Haal je het zelf weg?
eggie (2018-06-20 15:04:37+00:00): PB contact gehad.
viloan (2018-06-20 02:10:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
oPsiquiatra (2018-06-20 07:19:14+00:00): Gratidão Viloan! O OpenStreetMap é a simplesmente incrível! Vi muita coisa imperfeita, incompleta e com nomes errados, e arrumei alguns. Mal posso esperar pra ter mais um tempo pra arrumará 
Pelo jeito você é experiente, então se me permite, também vou tirar as dúvidas com você, quando aparecerem =)
Forte abraço!
eggie (2018-06-20 05:36:04+00:00): Binnen de bebouwde kom wordt meestal landuse=grass gebruikt. Het effect is overigens hetzelfde.
abakus_uploader (2018-06-20 22:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
3vivekb (2018-06-20 03:23:04+00:00): I removed a few of the extra crossings from this import.  Be careful next time :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59995745
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Supaplex (2019-04-27 05:56:16+00:00): 不好意思，你誤刪了公車站牌天母新村，導致不少公車路線出問題了
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
ClarkstonCorrect (2018-06-21 14:45:33+00:00): y tho
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-21 21:26:45+00:00): Why you made this edit without splitting it into separate changesets?
whalerich (2018-06-22 03:23:05+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I know that by the rules of good tone it is desirable to split such a package of edits. But according to the rules of the project, this is not a necessity. In my case, the size of the covered area in the package is determined by the conditions of the mapping quest.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-22 07:02:27+00:00): "conditions of the mapping quest." can you link description of this mapping quest?
whalerich (2018-06-22 07:21:13+00:00): welcome http://streak.osmz.ru/about
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-22 08:46:19+00:00): Thanks, I created https://github.com/Zverik/osmstreak/issues/38 to improve future edits.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:43:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 06:44:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
BCNorwich (2018-06-24 06:56:31+00:00): Squared up a lot of buildings, please check to spot any problems.
IIVQ (2018-07-29 18:37:48+00:00): Hey, you interchanged the postcode and addr:city on the Forsthaus Brauschied: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/599552424

I corrected them for you.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Łowicz (2018-06-21 06:12:20+00:00): Proponuję dla zmienionych punktów adresowych zmienić również źródło adresu. Część z nich jest chyba ze starego importu i ktoś może chcieć je wyrzucić.
Łukasz | Yanosik (2018-06-26 11:53:38+00:00): Dzięki za wskazówkę, poprawione. 
Pozdrawiam.
Łowicz (2018-06-21 06:13:40+00:00): Ten komentarz bardziej dotyczy tych punktów ;)

Proponuję dla zmienionych punktów adresowych zmienić również źródło adresu. Część z nich jest chyba ze starego importu i ktoś może chcieć je wyrzucić.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
felipeeugenio (2018-06-25 10:53:02+00:00): Hola
Esta carretera se encuentra habilitada?
dikkeknodel (2018-06-20 07:21:43+00:00): Hi mkačer,

Congratulations with changeset 60,000,000!

Keep up the happy mapping!

Cheers,
dikkeknodel
mkačer (2018-06-20 07:29:22+00:00): Thanks, coincidence.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-20 07:56:08+00:00): I wasn't aiming for it, but noticed my own changeset was just a few minutes too late :-).
Aphroditelita (2019-02-22 01:30:33+00:00): nice
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 16:11:11+00:00): Hej och välkommen till Openstreetmap!
Jag tänkte bara kolla, sitter det några skyltar eller dylikt som talar om att det är hästförbud?

Mvh
Anders
friderock (2018-06-20 16:44:03+00:00): Hej
Tack, jo det sitter en ridförbudsskylt i södra änden av stigen jag på till.

/Tomas
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 11:32:08+00:00): Even if footway implies no horse allowed, the tag is not unneccessary. If there is a sign saying no horse allowed and the user adds that, that is surveyed information. To remove that because the user selected footway intead of path (which I think this should be), is not good.
archie (2018-06-20 12:21:54+00:00): Då hade det ju något gott med sig. Det är lite svag argumentation; visserligen borde det rätteligen ha varit path men ändå. Det där köper jag inte.
archie (2018-06-20 14:16:44+00:00): highway=footway  innebär foot designated. Taggen horse=no i samband med highway=footway är därmed ett logiskt fel. Det var därför alldeles korrekt av mig att radera horse=no. Det framgår inte av kommentaren till changeset att det finns en "Ridning förbjuden"-skylt på platsen, som hade inneburit en korrekt  taggning: highway=path + horse=no + bicycle=no. Med tanke på att denna information inte fanns undrar jag vilket syfte du hade med din kommentar. Den är sakligt sett fullständigt överflödigt. Det där "is not good" uppfattar jag, med beaktande av ovanstående, som en aning  hotfullt och intimiderande. Jag utgår ifrån att du har tillräckligt med anstånd att be om ursäkt för detta förtäckta hot.
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 14:44:48+00:00): Är du på riktigt? Hotfullt? Det är sällan all information anges om hur informationen kommit mapparen till känna. Men du som tar bort information kanske vet att det inte fanns en skylt?

Att sitta och radera information som inte stämmer till 100% med en wiki-sida, dör riktlinjerna ändras lite då och då är inte att bidra. Det är att vandalisera.
archie (2018-06-20 15:06:09+00:00): Oftast finns det tolkningsutrymme. Inget är helt glasklart. Man kan ha olika tolkningar. Men just här finns det inget tolkningsutrymme. Ännu en gång: Footway är designated foot=yes. Att i det läge kritisera mig med att det inte är riktigt bra att jag i detta fall raderar ett helt felaktigt horse=no uppfattar jag som ett hot. Jag hade inte gjort det om det hade varit fråga om de vanliga fall där man kan ha olika meningar om saker.
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 15:27:58+00:00): Att skriva att något inte är bra är inte ett hot. Oavsett om du har rätt eller fel.
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 15:31:56+00:00): Om vi nu ska gå stenhårt efter wikin (där riktlinjerna ändras lite då och då), då måste det ju vara mest rätt att ändra vägklass till path och behålla horse=no. Ädrar du det?
archie (2018-06-20 15:51:06+00:00): Du verkar ha bättre kännedom om stället. Det är bättre du gör det. Jag åtgärdade bara ett logiskt fel. foot=yes och highway=footway uteslutar varandra (likadant som 2+2=4). wikin har rätt lite med det att göra; den ger oss bara upplysning om vilka algoritmer som gäller i programmet som renderar openstreetmap. I övrigt har jag ingen som helst uppfattning om hur det rätteligen skall taggas. Men det du föreslår, verkar rimligt på mig.
archie (2018-06-20 16:46:58+00:00): Jag vill ogärna orda ännu mera om detta. Men jag blev högst förvånad att du är tvungen att fråga om det där med skylten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60000047). Vad var egentligen  meningen med att du startade denna helt meningslösa kommentarsvit?
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 20:22:54+00:00): Meningen var att påpeka det olämpliga i att ta bort information någon lagt till. Tillför du något i det fallet eller saboterar du när du gör det? Det vore skillnad om det var motstridiga uppgifter, typ, highway=cycleway med bicycle=no.
archie (2018-06-20 21:05:30+00:00): Med förlov, du verkar vara rätt så begränsad i din uppfattningsförmåga. Jag tror inte att vi skall fortsätta. Du verkar inte ha förmåga att ta till dig argument. Helt makalöst. Jag avslutar det här nu.
AndersAndersson (2018-06-20 22:18:59+00:00): Jag förstår precis vad du menar, men jag håller inte med.
Bra det, då ändrar jag till det som du borde ha gjort från början.
Leo Slager (2018-06-21 09:55:27+00:00): En de bus-routes zijn ook weer gerepareerd.
archie (2018-06-20 08:09:28+00:00): what kind of shelter?
SebStar (2018-06-27 11:24:51+00:00): bigger (8-10pax) but similar to this one http://www.nordwinde.de/IMG/Windschutz/Kungaelv.jpg
archie (2018-06-27 12:52:33+00:00): shelter_type=? as in: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter?uselang=sv
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-06-21 12:53:56+00:00): Hello,

I took a closer look to your aerodrome. Although a good try, I used the already existing areas and added the correct tags to it, as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome
Frans S (2018-06-20 07:57:59+00:00): Geen idee waar je deze boodschap kunt zien
Владимир К (2018-06-20 13:00:11+00:00): а 17 подъезд точно там? на гуглопанорамах от 16 года там ничего нет. https://goo.gl/maps/kg9FQxiyKPp
Владимир К (2018-06-21 14:24:31+00:00): Добрый день!
было бы лучше, если вы отредактировали уже существующую точку.
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
kayle (2019-03-12 19:05:58+00:00): Ahoj, co je tato neoznacena ciara? Asi plot, podla orto usudzujem?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/599647523
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
dktue (2018-06-20 11:48:57+00:00): Gegengeprüft: Sieht gut aus! :-)

Gruß,
Daniel
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
segubi (2023-10-16 13:59:37+00:00): Vielleicht relativ lange her, aber was ist die Relation 8396610??? description "way 189245503".
Unbenannter Teil des normalen Radnetzes? (dann vielleicht eine etwas aussagekräftigere Beschreibung, network:type=basic_network, vielleicht in eine zugehörige passende Netzwerkrelation nehmen?)
Roland5 (2023-10-17 08:26:40+00:00): Offensichtlich ist mir damals ein Fehler beim Einfügen der Beschreibung unterlaufen. Leider kann ich mich jetzt nicht genügend genau an die Situation erinnern, als dass ich das noch inhaltlich korrigieren könnte. Angaben zu network:type und Netzwerkrelation konnte ich damals nicht machen, da ich dazu keine verlässlichen Beobachtungen gemacht habe. Auf Spekulationen habe ich verzichtet. Wenn du jetzt verlässliche Information dazu besitzt, freue ich mich auf deine Ergänzungen.
segubi (2023-10-17 21:14:26+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ich vermute mal, dass es sich um einen Teil des normalen Radnetzes handeln dürfte - immerhin ist es Dir als Radnetz aufgefallen. Vielleicht finde ich in mapillary o.ä. etwas...
Grüße, Sebastian
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].