piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
daphnecondon (2021-01-29 23:44:30+00:00): Glassman,
Excuse me! I meant to put that it is a single-lane rather than one way.
Glassman (2021-01-29 23:59:35+00:00): No problem. When I looked at the bridge it looked really narrow. But I assumed that was just the quality of the image. If you have any trouble fixing it just let me know.
jaap de vries (2021-02-01 10:19:35+00:00): Hallo,

Op deze plek staat een melding zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2516949 Ben jij toevallig de anonieme melder?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-16 10:08:45+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901725609#map=19/35.86815/7.09486 is existing?

What was source of this edit?

Why this building overlaps road?
StefanHRT (2021-01-29 20:38:08+00:00): Hallo, welcher Sidepath soll von den Raqdfahrern genutzt werden? Ist doch gar keiner eingezeichnet? Gruß
zergar (2021-01-29 20:51:38+00:00): Hallo,

Ich hatte in erinnerung, dass sich neben der Straße ein Fußweg befindet, der für Radfahrer*innen freigegeben ist, gerade aber festgestellt, dass ich mich da vertan habe. ich ändere zurück auf "dismount" (vgl. https://www.moz.de/lokales/falkensee/bauausschuss-falkensee-rederecht-im-ausschuss-wird-gut-angenommen-49260162.html)

Grüße
StefanHRT (2021-01-30 02:35:52+00:00): OK, nur als Hinweis, wenn "use_sidepath" verwendet wird, dann nur bei einem daneben separat eingetragen Weg in OSM und eigentlich auch nur, wenn dieser nutzungspflichtig ist ;) Gruß
zergar (2021-01-30 17:45:07+00:00): Merke ich mir. Danke für den Hinweis!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-16 15:20:53+00:00): What is the source of geometries of for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901730167 ?

What you wanted to express by landuse=house?

Is there a building there?
H4N5-antw (2022-06-11 19:37:10+00:00): Zeer hoog geachte Jakka, 

Weet u nog, waarom u een jaartje geleden de afrit naar in 't fietstunneltje op bicycle=no zette?
H4N5-antw (2022-06-11 19:38:00+00:00): Oei, drie maal geen fietsen ...
Jakka (2022-06-11 19:45:08+00:00): oeps niet meer ....
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
literan (2021-12-19 16:22:35+00:00): здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118849541/history как будто бы уже снова здание построили. Или снимки не очень свежие здесь?
ynx (2021-12-19 16:28:35+00:00): Там просто очень глубокая реконструкция была, больше похожая на снос. Сейчас здание есть и его уже заканчивают восстанавливать.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DaveF (2021-01-30 11:04:12+00:00): Hi 
What is a unclassified_highway designation?
Russ McD (2021-01-30 11:31:11+00:00): Hi Dave, Its the designation we are supposed to use for highways maintainable at public expense.. ORPA's on the Ordnance survey, and UCR's (unclassified county roads) to old school trail riders.  Some Councils reclassify to BOAT's after consultation, which is rare, but don't change existing data unless Im sure, hence the comment. Cheers.
DaveF (2021-01-30 12:24:45+00:00): Hi
What source informed you they are municipally maintained?
Russ McD (2021-01-30 12:47:13+00:00): Most of my UCR info came from maps I marked up in the 80's after copying from the definitive map in the Council offices.  That was a long time ago, and way before NERC...  lanes dont change, but the designation can.  There are some online sources you can look at too such as the NSG to corroborate status, if it does not show on Council ProW online maps (often they don't show UCR's as they are not actually a right of way, per se.) Does that help you?
DaveF (2021-01-31 14:59:17+00:00): Unsure.
NERC If you mean Natural Environment Research Council, I'm unclear as to the relevance.
What does NSG mean?
Can you tell me which OOC OS maps, or definitive statements shows these definitions.  
By your own statement (& trail's) unclassified_highway appears to be a classification rather than a designation of a right of way. 
As an example could you explain where you got the designation for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42959405
Russ McD (2021-01-31 15:27:48+00:00): NSG - National Street Gazetteer. 
I referred to NERC as a light hearted mention of how things have changed since the 80's.
Before this gets into a pissing match, I am using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Tagging   for my guidelines on tagging. If you believe this is not valid, then we better take this to the forum for larger input, & get the Wiki taken down or changed if no longer correct.
The example you refer to ... "Tynings Lane", is maintainable at public expense by the Local Highway Authority, or at least it was when I last checked.  If you know that it has since been adopted privately then I stand corrected and will apologise and you may retag if you have evidence of such.
menaa Edificius (2021-01-29 20:48:04+00:00): BIM EDIFICIUS
ortho_is_hot (2021-02-01 05:11:52+00:00): Hi, I've restored one of the waterbodies that you deleted as based on Maxar Premium (the imagery that the original editor used, as well as the one that appears to be most up to date) this water source still exists (changeset 98480045)

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Stephen L Arnold (2021-01-31 04:56:23+00:00): From Cottonwood Drive to the Velo UnderRound, this cycleway is called the "Military Ridge Path". It is under Fitchburg jurisdiction and requires no trail pass. The Military Ridge State Trail" begins at 1.  Cottonwood Dr and goes southwest. It is under DNR jurisdiction and requires a trail pass. The "Path" and "Trail" distinction is observed in names in Madison and Fitchburg. Please do not change this way to "State Trail".
2.  From the McKee Rd bridge to the Dunn's Marsh boardwalk, the Military Ridge Path, Velo UnderRound, Cannonball Path, and approaches are closed for sewer construction from Dec 2020 through Dec 2021. They must be tagged
highway=construction and
construction=cycleway, *not*
highway=cycleway
I will be monitoring this project closely for Bike Fitchburg and will update the check_date and opening_date as they become firm and retagging when the facilities reopen.
impiaaa (2021-01-30 19:14:18+00:00): This (along with the numerous other preschools that you've mapped) seems to just be somebody's house, and I don't see any signs in Streetside advertising that it is a preschool. Are you sure this (as well as the others) isn't an invasion of this homeowner's privacy?
matthieun (2021-01-31 04:01:02+00:00): I mapped this as part of the maproulette project described here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Minh%20Nguyen/diary/395029
As I understand it, all those edits come from public business records that have been filed by the owners to explain their social distancing protocols.
Also for in home day cares in the area it is common to not have a sign, or just a really small one hard to spot.
impiaaa (2021-01-31 04:19:37+00:00): Yes, I helped build that MapRoulette project. In the directions, it says "Check that the address is to a business/office open to clients and not the business owner's house. Skip tasks in private residential areas." But if you think the person here wouldn't mind clients coming to the door (excepting pandemic restrictions), then it's fine.
matthieun (2021-01-31 22:25:07+00:00): Thanks for contributing to that project! This is what keeps OSM awesome!
For the in-home daycares the place of business is usually the home where clients come and drop-off their children; so I think tagging the house is ok. But I agree in case of a plumber or locksmith for example, who list their house but conduct their business outside, it would make sense to skip those tasks.
impiaaa (2021-01-31 23:18:06+00:00): Alright, sounds good. Thanks for contributing as well!
Carnildo (2021-01-30 08:46:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

I'm not sure what you were trying to do with the bicycle path on Trail Street, but drawing one thing over another like that confuses the heck out of route-finding software.

If you were trying to indicate that the Milwaukee Trail follows Trail Street, that's done through what's called a "route relation", and Trail Street is already part of the relation for the Milwaukee Trail.
benweissMSO (2021-02-01 18:49:55+00:00): Thanks for checking on this. The Milwaukee Trail does follow Trail Street. But, if it is already connected through the "Route Relation," why does it not show up as bike path in the symbology (those sections are blank/do not have blue dashed lines?)
Carnildo (2021-02-01 19:32:24+00:00): Which map are you checking?  The "standard" layer on OSM.org is designed around drawing streets, but if you click on the "layers" tab on the right, you can bring up the "CyclOSM" or "Cycle Map" layer, both of which have Trail Street highlighted in blue.

There's a lot more information in OSM than can be shown on any one map.  People have produced specialist maps for everything from power lines to downhill ski routes based on it.
benweissMSO (2021-02-01 19:43:27+00:00): I'm looking at the CycleOSM layer and thinking that the blue highlight is for the entire route being on a regional trail network, but that it is somehow missing the dashed blue links where the trail is adjacent to roadway. 

I am trying to update the bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, cycle tracks, trails, and hopefully, Neighborhood Greenways, in Missoula and am having trouble understanding why certain changes are showing up on CyclOSM and Cycle Map and others aren't.
Carnildo (2021-02-01 21:08:35+00:00): It takes time for changes to propagate to all the layers.  Cycle Map has a two-week update frequency, which would explain why it's not showing your changes yet.
gpserror (2022-08-01 17:54:38+00:00): I removed the overlapping route in changeset 124358675 as another validation tool requested its revert as a MapRoulette task.  In any case, to reiterate, it depends on the renderer whether the route is drawn with the dotted lines or whatnot.  Again the CyclOSM/Cycle Map should be the ones that have a complete coloration of the trail and I'm not sure of the render cadence of these representations.
hauke-stieler (2021-02-08 17:10:01+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier einen Knoten hinzugefügt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8376686467) aber ohne sinnvolle tags, sondern nur mit Namen. Um was handelt es sich denn? Ein Büro? Ein Einzelhandelsgeschäft? Etwas anderes?

Grüße
Hauke
eggie (2021-01-30 07:03:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
AnonymousAlligator (2021-01-29 22:45:58+00:00): Hi! I'm not sure the track should have a name tag--it should probably go on the park itself.

Also, what's the purpose of moving/deleting a couple of the track segments? It seemed fine the way it was before.
Glassman (2021-01-29 23:27:53+00:00): Tip:connect the stairs to the road with a short section of highway=footway. If the sidewalks are mapped, then just connect the stairs to the sidewalk.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98391060
ElliottPlack (2021-01-29 22:12:30+00:00): Here is the changeset where I split up the areas into sub-units, five years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38457685#map=11/39.2766/-76.8279

At the time, the boundary=protected_area tagging was still relatively new. Now that it is well formed, it makes more sense to tag the overall boundary this way, and to remove the arbitrary sub-unit splits from protected area tagging.
eggie (2021-01-30 07:06:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback:  Je hebt per abuis denk ik van Vorststraat 30-G05 naar die garage gesleept. Dat komt door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-30 07:17:54+00:00): Adres hersteld. Hier zie je wat je hebt gedaan https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98391843
eggie (2021-01-30 07:10:21+00:00): Beste Burkzwukser
In OSM zetten we geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn als het goed is al adresnodes aanwezig.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-30 07:16:43+00:00): Het adres van 'mijn huis'  heb ik weer verwijderd.
Het adres 31-G05 weer teruggeplaatst.
MVG
eggie
Burkzwukser (2021-01-30 22:08:39+00:00): Bedankt.
eggie (2021-01-30 22:11:15+00:00): No problem :)
ivanbranco (2021-01-30 09:23:26+00:00): Hi,

leisue=great vue it's an invalid tag. Did you meant great view? In that case you could use the tag tourism=viewpoint
user_5359 (2021-01-31 06:43:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things and not game items like Pokemon Parks. Please be sure to do so.
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:25:18+00:00): Deleted attractions at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543 (checked by survey on 18 June 2025)
javbw (2024-03-19 02:57:51+00:00): Model_areodromes are not airports.
mrpulley (2025-08-02 09:26:40+00:00): What are these attractions? They are placed next to the road, but nothing obvious is located here.
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:25:12+00:00): Deleted attractions at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543 (checked by survey on 17/18 June 2025)
abakus_uploader (2021-01-30 23:33:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:25:02+00:00): Deleted apartment at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543 (possibly duplicate of nearby motel)
user_5359 (2021-01-31 06:23:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag IGM Italia=Torrente Scorzella? Did you mean source=IGM Italia?
nero mosca (2021-01-31 22:50:02+00:00): Thank you. Sorry for the mistake... it is exact, I mean that the source for Torrente Scorzella is the IGM map
ivanbranco (2021-01-30 09:13:16+00:00): What does the Engelbert=Humperdinck. tag stands for?
BCNorwich (2021-01-30 09:06:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

With respect, if a feature is on the ground then it's a valid feature to be added to OSM. So there's no need to remove something like this. If the feature needs amending/correcting it's OSM practice to do this to the existing feature. So I've reinstated the path and amended the tags to access=forestry, highway=track. I've also added the public footpath.

Regards Bernard.
Mordechai23 (2021-02-17 21:50:50+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś nazwy przystanków? Była już o tym dyskusja, że zmieniamy pl. na plac. Poza tym pozmieniałeś to niedokładnie, bo jeden "plac" się ostał https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1701723489
Mordechai23 (2021-02-18 08:49:52+00:00): Chciałem Ci podlinkować link do forum, ale ta rozmowa była w jakiejś uwadze albo gdzieś i nie mogę jej znaleźć, więc przytoczę tylko meritum:

zgodnie z wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Skr.C3.B3ty_.28nie_r.C3.B3b_tego.21.29) wszelkie skróty w nazwach powinny być rozwijane ("Jeśli nazwa może być napisana bez używana skrótów, to nie robimy tego"), bo nikt wyszukując przystanku nie wpisze "pl." tylko "plac". 

Tak też mówią spikerzy w tramwajach i tak nazywa się plac, od którego się wzięła nazwa przystanku.

Nazwa w formacie "pl. Orląt Lwowskich" trafiła do official_name=*, bo tak jest w materiałach MPK, ale to nie znaczy, że jest poprawną formą do umieszczenia u nas w name=*
maro21 (2021-02-18 23:14:06+00:00): Nie chcę się znowu spierać z marafem o nazwy. Według niego ma być dokładnie tak jak jest na tabliczce - patrz dyskusje: https://www.osm.org/changeset/84021303 https://www.osm.org/node/6970391826/history https://www.osm.org/changeset/71573754 https://www.osm.org/node/6498639530/history

Gdzie była dyskusja o nazwach przystanków? Zresztą jako źródło swojej zmiany podałeś nieaktualną stronę, na której nie ma takich nazw.
Jeśli ustalimy, że skróty w nazwach przystanków (przynajmniej we Wrocławiu i okolicach) rozwijamy, to róbmy to konsekwetnie, bo ty też zmieniłeś tylko niektóre. maraf wiele razy edytował przystanki i skoro nie rozwinął skrótów, to uznałem, że tak ma być. Ustalmy to gdzieś jak ma być i róbmy to konsekwentnie, ale nie w komentarzu do zmian ani w uwadze, bo to czytasz tylko ty, ja i maraf. Np. w tym temacie https://forum.osm.org/viewtopic.php?id=68852
Mordechai23 (2021-02-19 08:42:31+00:00): Słusznie, napiszę post na forum
Mordechai23 (2021-02-19 09:44:51+00:00): Dodałem post na https://forum.osm.org/viewtopic.php?id=68852
maraf24 (2021-02-19 11:48:50+00:00): Nie rozumiem, dlaczego pojawiłem się w komentarzach pod tym zestawem.
Ani nie rozwijałem tu skrótów, ani tego nie cofałem.
tastrax (2021-01-30 00:44:35+00:00): Apologies - these are the NSW nodes
mueschel (2021-01-30 10:40:38+00:00): Hi,
please don't try to add departure times to OSM. There was a long discussion and a vote with a huge majority against it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Departures
abakus_uploader (2021-01-30 23:33:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aharvey (2021-01-30 03:15:51+00:00): Looks good. Just that we should remove cycleway:both=no when using cycleway=share_busway as they are contradictory.
mitchelldm (2021-02-07 00:33:18+00:00): Good point! Thanks, I missed that.
Glassman (2021-01-30 16:54:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. You might be interested in https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98395799
b-jazz (2021-02-02 17:54:43+00:00): Another example of an oddly rotated building: way 901820851
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-31 01:08:47+00:00): i have no idea what this changeset did
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98396471
user_5359 (2021-01-30 10:42:37+00:00): Hello! Did you know the page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:landuse?
literan (2021-01-30 11:44:13+00:00): не надо писать описания типа "Аптека" в поле, предназначенное для названия. Откатываю в этой части.
skquinn (2021-01-30 23:59:56+00:00): How is a changeset involving real estate agents in France stretching over to India and the US?
skquinn (2021-01-31 00:01:01+00:00): Oops, disregard, I clicked on the wrong changeset and didn't realize it. I'll go wipe the egg off my face now...
JoeG (2021-01-30 11:32:23+00:00): Please don't do this. If an organisation doesn't have any other website, then their Facebook page is their website.
I don't mind adding contact:facebook but the existing website tag shouldn't be removed without checking that the organisation has no alternative website.
tastrax (2021-01-30 12:12:25+00:00): Having the tag duplicated in both contact:facebook and website seems superfluous to me when there is a dedicated tag for Facebook (and instagram, youtube, twitter etc). Its also harder for data consumers when social media links are in the incorrect fields. Are you tagging in the website field so that it appears correctly in some third party map product (ie Tagging for the renderer)?
JoeG (2021-01-30 22:08:35+00:00): I'm tagging website so that the official website of an organisation is known. This is a classic problem in OSM that the meaning of a missing tag is ambiguous. I could obviously tag website=no, or website=facebook but hopefully you'll agree that tagging the actual Facebook url is a better solution.
JoeG (2021-01-30 22:11:33+00:00): I should add that I'm happy to systematically add contact:facebook when I do this, though in my opinion we should then also have tags for Menulog, ubereats, easi etc.
tastrax (2021-01-30 23:35:02+00:00): I agree tagging can be a bit of a minefield and over time tags for things like Ubereats etc may come into existence. It just takes someone to write up the proposal to the community and get acceptance The wiki on website is pretty specific in regards to facebook and other social media, as is the contact wiki.
JoeG (2021-01-31 00:53:17+00:00): Not sure what you mean about the wiki being specific in regards to Facebook - it doesn't specify what to do in this situation, where the Facebook page is also an organisation's official website. I intend to add back the website tag, but will leave the contact:facebook as is. Please don't "deduplicate" it.
tastrax (2021-01-31 00:59:04+00:00): No problems at all, but please be aware that we have asked for this type of listing to be validated in ID editor so you may find in the future that this is edited by another user. There is only one other site in Australia now with a social media URL in website and I am just waiting for a local to verify that and then it will also be edited.
JoeG (2021-01-31 01:20:14+00:00): Thanks. I've now edited the wiki and responded to an existing conversation there, and added a comment on GitHub.
maraf24 (2021-01-31 12:42:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
Cristoffs (2021-01-31 18:06:56+00:00): Piotr, na temat takich edycji już rozmawialiśmy .....
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-31 18:18:08+00:00): Nie można robić automatycznych edycji bez dyskusji i zgody społeczności.

Każdy może wycofać taką edycję.

Robienie automatycznych edycji bez uprzedniej zgody nie jest ok i prowadzi do zablokowania konta.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-31 21:29:30+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98467555
G_P_J (2021-02-01 11:50:47+00:00): Panowie, wytłumaczcie mi, co tu jest nie tak? Jedyny automat, który tu zadziałał, to odpowiednie wyszukanie odpowiednich błędnych tagów i następnie ich poprawa na zgodne z ustaleniami społeczności. Nie nastąpiło usunięcie żadnych danych. Mógłbym oczywiście oznaczyć je jako fixme, a potem prosić o ręczne przeklikanie wszystkich i usunięcie tagu city. Czy to coś by zmieniło oprócz wydłużenia pracy? Rezultatem tej kwerendy jest wyfiltrowanie przeze mnie duplikatów adresów i zapisanie ich do dalszej poprawy, którą będę teraz robił ręcznie po wnikliwej weryfikacji z geoportalem. Naprawdę wystrzegam się głupot.