piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2025-07-20 17:28:08+00:00): Здравей Пламен,

Може ли да провериш https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12585485 (чийто първоизточник е https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45331277)? Струва ми се малко съмнително гимназия да има 6-7 детски площадки в двора си :).

Поздрави,
Митко
derredu (2017-07-31 09:45:46+00:00): Hallo Klaus-Heinz, sicher das da eine Feuerwache (fire_station) steht? Feuerwachen sind ja eher Gebäude wo Feuerwehrwagen stehen.
Klaus Herda (2017-07-31 09:52:10+00:00): Hallo Derredu,
oh, da hab ich wirklich gepennt. Es ist nur ein Grillplatz. Danke, dass Du Bescheid gesagt hast. Ich hab den Punkt sofort gelöscht.
Gruß Klaus
kocio (2020-02-04 03:48:47+00:00): Hej, z podkładu Geoportalu wygląda, że tego stadionu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155489469) już nie ma, za to jest więcej boisk, chciałem się upewnić, czy to można pozmieniać? I czy nazwa kompleksu nie brzmi przypadkiem po prostu Centrum Sportu i Rekreacji?
Владимир К (2015-11-06 07:58:32+00:00): Подписывать парковки не нужно, все характеристики прописываются в тегах. Значения тэгов документированы, не нужно в них писать своими словами на русском
alixhartmann (2018-06-18 20:20:56+00:00): Hi there! I see this edit was made many years ago, but I was wondering if you could let me know what you used to rename this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46603445/ - from to "Deenicull" to "Denicull". Vicroads data shows the former. Thanks!
Ficky Aditya Romansya (2020-08-07 08:42:03+00:00): hi LTKA,
I modified this way155935250, change to residential road. Thank you
richlv (2022-08-17 11:28:57+00:00): Hi, this changeset added name:fr for a Latvian town of "Dagda" - but it was added as "Dadga".
Was that a typo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/119253538/history
richlv (2022-12-20 16:16:38+00:00): Removed that tag.
eteb3 (2021-07-30 15:42:11+00:00): Hi Eriks

I did a quick search on Overpass Turbo for fixme=* in the Caversham area to find things that needed work. I see almost every house has a tag <fixme=add full address>

I think this might have been from this changeset, but I'm not an OSM expert.

Was it your edit that put them there?

Thanks
eggie (2018-05-02 15:26:44+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2022-01-07 06:42:22+00:00): May I ask you after a long time what the meaning of the key "# DOT" at https://www.osm.org/node/602391114/history is? Is this some kind of reference number of the level crossing?
Felix Ko (2022-01-07 16:30:37+00:00): Every railroad crossing, both grade separated and at-grade have a federal ID # referred to as the FRA DOT #.
aharvey (2015-03-23 23:13:15+00:00): Why is this named footbridge? Is there actually a sign labelling it? It seems to me like foot=yes + bridge=yes + highway=path is enough to indicated it is a footbridge.
eggie (2019-10-08 12:01:52+00:00): Na vele jaren weer eeb bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... 
Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Henklaak (2019-10-08 20:14:24+00:00): Dank. Er verandert niet zoveel in mijn omgeving, dus "if it isn't broken, don't fix it".

Gr, Henk
Oskarst_ (2024-04-26 08:09:23+00:00): Hei, kan se ut som om way 156344031 ikke finnes. Kjenner du til den?
meastp (2024-04-29 04:21:10+00:00): hei - enig, det ser kun ut til å være sti fra tyristubben til barnålveien. Jeg gikk der på et tidspunkt for å sjekke, men enten har jeg tatt feil, eller så er det noe nybygg ila. 12 år. :)
Oskarst_ (2024-05-02 07:15:54+00:00): Takk for tilbakemelding!
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-06 05:32:51+00:00): HI, Dymo12. I added bridge on the primary road (way 148655144) and adjusted it based on Maxar Premium Imagery
DeBigC (2022-06-16 04:57:31+00:00): I know this was a long time ago, but you can make buildings square (orthogonalisation) by pressing Q in JOSM or S inID editor. Have a look at how I have improved the accuracy of the building shapes around here and maybe you can do more of this town :)
zstadler (2025-05-14 09:21:56+00:00): Hi,

Do you remember why you changed these nodes from suburb to hamlet?
Hamlet is supposed to be an isolated settlement.
KTim (2017-08-05 13:45:46+00:00): Hi,
du hast den Hermann-Billung Wanderweg hier damals mit dem Symbol „weißes B auf schwarzem Grund“ eingetragen. In Lüneburg ist er genau umgekehrt mit schwarzem B auf weißem Grund beschildert. Ist die Beschilderung in deiner Region inzwischen auch so oder handelt es sich um regionale Unterschiede?
smarties (2017-08-05 20:48:16+00:00): Hi,
Du hast eine E-Mail.
Gruß smarties
user_5359 (2019-12-07 08:55:10+00:00): Hallo! Lange ist die Änderung her, aber kannst Du uns noch sagen was derTag wp=wp bedeuten soll? (siehe auch https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/OLT)
ke9tv (2022-02-20 22:49:00+00:00): I'm attaching this message as a comment to several changesets,
because I see that there were several cooks in the kitchen here.

I see that there's a polygon,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156508026,
that's gone through several rounds of editing, and which I don't
understand.  I'm entering this message on several changesets that
have edited it in hopes that someone can explain to me what's
supposed to be going on here.  Multiple users have been
adding/deleting `landuse=residential`, and adding/deleting
`place=town`.

What is the actual intent of this area?  If it's io indicate a
residential landuse, then it is overbroad, because I can see that
it includes several schools, several religious facilities, a
couple of parks, a cemetery, a golf course or two, and what
appears to be a commercial strip.  It would be possible to make
the area the outer way of a multipolygon and then cut out these
inner land uses as inner ways, or to break the residential area
up into smaller pieces.

If the intent is to mark the boundaries of the Town of DeWitt, as
Stupefacient's comment on changeset 9116121 would tend to
indicate, that's also not correct. This irregular round area is
about half in the City of Syracuse and half in the Town of
DeWitt.  Th portion that is in Syracuse appears to be something
that's informally identified with the Meadowbrook neighbourhood,
while the portion that's in DeWitt township coincides almost, but
not quite, with the DeWitt census-designated place - which
I plan to upload as `boundary=census`.

I'm in the process of updating minor civil divisions in New York
from 2020 census data and 2021 New York State reference data,
and I hope that someone who's manipulated this area can give me
some insight into what should be done with it.
Marcos Dione (2019-06-13 21:25:53+00:00): HI Sergio. I just noticed this changeset of yours, that seems ton include this looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152083608 could you please fix it?
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 04:17:30+00:00): Hi Paul_012. Your edit looks awesome, but would you check area (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/156519414) due overlap with water body, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143786614). Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-22 17:01:12+00:00): I know that it is 7 years old - but many meadows added in this import seems to have shape unrelated to things on the ground - like for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156618076

Can you consider fixing this data?
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:54:46+00:00): Hi, I migrated the surface=red earth ways in this changeset to surface=laterite: red earth is the local English name for the same surface (Auroville/Tamil Nadu), and surface=laterite was approved as the canonical tag on 2026-06-15. Let me know if you think this doesn't apply here. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 18:29:28+00:00): Jesteś pewien że to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28741847/history atrakcja turystyczna?
woodpeck (2017-11-08 20:57:12+00:00): Hello luiswoo, it appears to me that this, and a couple similar changesets, may have been an undiscussed data import that happened five years ago. Do you remember what you did here? The houses carry a source tag of "rosreestr" - what data source is that, and what license is it published under?

Why did you add "category=Земли поселений (земли населенных пунктов)" to every single house?
luiswoo (2017-11-09 02:02:36+00:00): Как такого импорта данных не было. Адреса брались в процессе обрисовки зданий по снимкам. Во всяком случает source=rosreestr относится к адресам, а не к самим зданиям.

Росреестр (rosreestr) — https://rosreestr.ru/site/en/about/

До изменения лицензии OSM, адресные данные Росреестра соответствовали лицензии OSM.
Сейчас osm:ru находится в ожидании, что Росреестр перелицензирует адресные данные. На ту же лицензию, что и геометрию кадастровых участков. И не предпринимает активных действий. Адресные данные Росреестра активно использовались всем osm:ru по всей стране.
В противном случае этот объем данных будет очень сложно восстановить. Желающих обрисовывать частные дома и пять лет назад было не много, тем более заниматься их нумерацией. Сейчас их стало ещё меньше. 

"category=Земли поселений (земли населенных пунктов)"  — это относится к земельному участку, не зданию, да. Но возможно полезно.
luiswoo (2017-11-09 02:05:41+00:00): Декларация российского совета OSM по адресным данным Росреестра https://goo.gl/wjjBLi
woodpeck (2017-11-09 07:26:40+00:00): You say that the buildings were drawn from photos. Looking at the current Bing imagery, the building outlines do not match the imagery, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=156818899#map=19/47.26188/39.69043 - the shape of the building is different. What imagery did you use to trace the buildings from?
luiswoo (2017-11-09 10:15:47+00:00): Сейчас снимки не высшего качества, тогда были ещё хуже. Больше 17 масштаба и не было. Yahoo был от силы 16 масштаба. Ошибки распознания снимка. Делал, скорей всего, по Bing. По Yahoo частный сектор было делать практически не реально.
Если бы и занимался импортом данных, то брал бы их отсюда http://rostov-gorod.info/administration/structure/departments/daig/important/gradostroitelstvo/pravila-zemlepolzovaniya-i-zastroyki/pziz-aktualnaya/5.%20%D0%9E%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%B8%D1%8E%D0%BD%D1%8C%202017.pdf проблем с геометрий здесь нет, ибо топосъёмка.
trial (2020-05-06 12:08:57+00:00): Hi, yes it's an old changeset ;-).
I see some liferings not tagged as "usual" the more classical way:
    emergency=rescue_equipment
    rescue_equipment=lifering
Any good reason for that, more important can we change?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TGN
Turleder'n (2020-05-06 20:17:51+00:00): Please feel free to update the tags to the current standard. 
The tagging in this changeset seems to follow some outdated scheme.
trial (2020-05-07 07:51:53+00:00): Thanks for the fast feedback. Done.
Eebie (2015-08-24 11:21:56+00:00): Hello,
I am Flemish OSM contributor also active in Liège. I am completing GR564 and some similar hiking routes. I saw that you did 'RB PN 4b Parc naturel Burdinale - Mehaigne'. I am missing the information how this hiking route is marked on the ground. I am missing the symbol and colours of these route marks. They aren't on the map, 'osmc:symbol' would be nice. The URL 'http://www.grsentiers.org/cgi-bin/topog/rbpn.php' that you give isn't working.

Kind regards,

Eebie
gerdami (2015-08-25 09:23:20+00:00): Dear Eebie,
Thank you for contacting me.
I just updated the link to the SGR publication (thanks to Google).
The "randonnées en boucle" (roundtrip routes) actually reuse parts of neighbouring GRs routes, thus share parts of their markings.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Gerdami
Eebie (2015-09-03 21:50:11+00:00): Hello,
Only the GR routes that are marked should remain in OSM. When route 4B isn't marked, it will be deleted out of OSM at a certain moment. The principles are described in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice (There is French translation but that isn't complete). The relevant principles are 'Mappez ce qu'il y a au sol' and 'Vérification'. This last principle 'les autres contributeurs doivent être aptes à récupérer les mêmes données que vous avez entrées' has as consequence for non marked (parts of) routes, that are only described in a book, is that another mapper who checks a mapped route and doesn't find any marks, can only conclude that this route doesn't exist (anymore) and that it should be deleted in OSM.  Good practice principle: 'Corrigez les erreurs' is another principle
of Good Practice.
gerdami (2015-09-04 19:21:49+00:00): Dear Eebie,
You have a restrictive reading of the guidelines, which by the way are guidelines, not rules.
The guidelines do not say anything about relations, which are logical by definition.
If we were to follow your restrictive view, one would have to delete all maritime lines because they could not be verified on the ground. Bus lines should be removed as well because, unlike railways, there are no physical markings on the roads, a part bus stops. International bus lines such as Eurolines could not be mapped. Same would go for airlines. 
Moreover, as regards the walking route I created as relation, it fully complies with the "Verifiability" criteria since the route is described in a real book which can be bought or read by anyone.
Finally, you should read again the introduction of the guidelines that says "Nobody is forced to obey them, nor will OSM ever force any of its mappers to do anything. There might be cases where these guidelines don't apply, or even contradict each other." Not to mention the "Any tags you like principle" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like) which reads "Remember that OpenStreetMap does not have any content restrictions on tags that can be assigned to nodes, ways or areas. You can use any tags you like, but please document them here on the OpenStreetMap wiki, even if self explanatory." ... 
Thank you for your understanding.
Best,
gerdami
Eebie (2015-09-05 22:00:39+00:00): Hello,
I put this issue to the Belgian OSM community on via talk-be. See  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2015-September/thread.html
Regards,
Eebie
eggie (2017-09-28 12:27:37+00:00): Opnieuw welkom gestuurd per PB
surveyor54 (2017-12-15 21:08:41+00:00): Hi,
gibts die Pfütze noch ?
Oder kann die raus?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157002257#map=19/50.43854/9.28687
Gruß
svr54
doddoh (2017-12-15 21:36:25+00:00): Ich habe die Pfütze entfernt, da diese nur temporär vorhanden und der Weg meißt durch Schranke gesperrt ist.
surveyor54 (2017-12-15 21:39:11+00:00): Danke :)
Send_Nodes (2017-11-02 15:29:21+00:00): Are these oneways confirmed? They don't make sense with the new residential road going south
ForstEK (2018-06-13 22:18:43+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы создали точку без описания - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1692802076.
Что это такое?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:41:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72151301/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
Владимир К (2015-12-02 17:24:15+00:00): Тэги amenity=school вешаются не на здание, а на территорию, обычно окруженную забором
tuxayo (2016-01-14 22:53:35+00:00): Hay que poner al menos foot=yes a las ciclovías si hay espacio para los peatones. Porque implícitamente, highway=cycleway prohíbe a ellos.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Spain

Mas detalles:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated

Deben quedar muchas ciclovias que corregir.

Otros changesets con este problema:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7938025
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7941520
SomeoneElse (2019-10-19 23:30:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157332953/history is not a byway.  There is a "no vehicles" sign at the south end.
eggie (2019-05-01 07:48:20+00:00): Jaren geleden al begonnen met mappen, maar nog niet veel edits. Ik zal je de welkomstmail met nuttige links en tips sturen per PB  zoals nieuwe mappers en "herintreders" ze momenteel krijgen. Wellicht kun je er je voordeel mee doen.
MVG,
Eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-21 07:37:41+00:00): Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tPd for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable) My comment is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157420332#map=17/52.882231/7.3076756layers=N
trigpoint (2015-12-28 10:56:25+00:00): Hi
Is Taunton Road really a dual carriagway?
If it is, it is missing oneway tags, however it doesn't look like there is any physical division on bing imagery.
On bing I can see a right turn lane into Elmwood Road, but it seems to join at a bridge with no connectivity from the southbound A38.
Jestr88 (2015-12-28 11:03:42+00:00): Hi Trigpoint, I think I marked it as dual to make it visible where each side was two lanes. It all needs improving now more options are available in OSM, but lately I have been concentrating on drawing houses in Bridgwater
GerdP (2015-10-21 13:07:03+00:00): please review:
what does the tag highway=natural
on some nodes mean ? Is it a typo?
nodes: 1697289695,1697289697,1697277217,1697289701
GerdP (2015-11-02 17:43:04+00:00): I've removed the nodes, did not see anything special at these places.
eggie (2019-11-14 15:53:01+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen . bij deze opnieuw ... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
SK53 (2020-12-18 10:47:55+00:00): The Furness Road Allotment site still looks pretty " allotmenty" on the latest Bing imagery
utack (2015-12-26 22:54:59+00:00): Servus Toni,
ich kenn ja den Alten nördlichen Friedhof nicht, aber warum ist er 
layer=-1?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3988127

MFG
ToniE (2015-12-27 12:02:20+00:00): Hmm, gute Frage. Läßt sich leider (wegen Lizenzumstellung) nicht mehr herausfinden, wer's. Aber anscheinend habe ich's bei meiner letzten Änderung nicht korrigiert.

Früher hatte man mal landuse=x innerhalb landuse=x mit layer=1 auf landuse=x getagged anstatt ein multipuoygon mit outer/inner zu benutzen. Aber layer=-1 macht hier wohl null Sinn.
Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2015-12-27 12:03:19+00:00): ... landuse=x innerhalb von landuse=y mit layer=1 auf landuse=x ... blöde Fipptehler
utack (2015-12-27 12:39:40+00:00): JOSM hat es dir zugeordnet, wusste garnicht dass das jetzt "falsch" ist, wegen der Lizenumstellung von damals.
ToniE (2015-12-27 13:04:57+00:00): Oops, hab' mich falsch ausgedrückt.
Wegen der Lizenzumstellung läßt sich nicht mehr herausfinden, wer's ursprünglich auf layer=-1 gesetzt hatte. Ich war der letzte Editor und auch davor schon ein paar mal und hatte den Fehler nicht bemerkt und somit nicht korrgiert.
Wenn Du bei 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3988127
im linken Fenster runter scrollst und "View History" (oder entspr. auf Deutsch) klickst kannst Du nachverfolgen, wer's wann mal angepackt hat.
Gruß,
Toni
Maciej9 (2025-08-24 17:41:22+00:00): Czym są dodane tu ruiny?
Qavai (2020-09-22 08:42:04+00:00): Зачем СабринаТопури удалила эти 4 дома?
mavl (2020-09-22 09:30:00+00:00): Qavai, вряд ли участник Stud555 знает ответ на этот вопрос. Лучше спросить у участника СабринаТопури.
Qavai (2020-09-22 11:34:47+00:00): Она удалила много домов и в других посёлках. СабринаТопури не отвечает в паблик.
naoliv (2017-09-26 12:53:22+00:00): csoriano001, do you remember the source that you did use for the street names, please?
yzemaze (2016-12-18 19:41:15+00:00): Hi, I’ve stumbled upon your changeset because of OSM-Inspector (routing view). People in Maldon seem to like their fences. But how do these people get to their houses without a single entrance or gate?
(Or did you just use barrier=fence to mark properties?)
ca_hoot (2016-12-18 21:10:03+00:00): Hello, I've not had the chance to split those ways (fences) yet to add gaps where they exist. But you are welcome to... It's fairly obvious from Bing imagery. Might be a nice project for you. It's probably time to move on after the over 23k buildings, paths, 7k roads, shops, schools, businesses, 10k house numbers, allotments, parks, churches, car parks, road names etc I have added in the Maldon district. Good luck!
GerdP (2015-10-31 10:04:54+00:00): please review way 157937436:
I think 
highway=moving_walkway
layer=-1
level=0;-1
should be replaced by e.g.
highway=footway
conveying=*
incline=down
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aconveying
and maybe
indoor=yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-26 17:29:47+00:00): Hej czemu mamy i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1701715726/history#map=19/51.11890/17.04204 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1701715734/history - z tego co widzę tam jest jeden przystanek.
Владимир К (2016-07-20 13:54:08+00:00): скажите, а почему озеро унтор отрисовано именно так? на снимках оно намного больше. вы отрисовали в сухой период?
canfe (2020-03-18 10:39:16+00:00): In che senso il torrente Toa
Boat=no ??
Klumbumbus (2017-08-12 11:19:17+00:00): Hallo,
liegt zwar schon ein Weilchen zurück, aber warst du dir sicher mit der Position der Adresse? Im WebAtlasSN ist die Adresse 150m weiter westlich.
VG
bürsti (2017-08-12 11:29:32+00:00): Hallo, ich war vor mindestens 10 Jahren mal dort um die Hausnummer für das Strassenbuch zu finden. Die 122 ist ein ehemaliges Bahnwärterhaus.
Aus der Erinnerung heraus, habe ich die Hausnummer eingetragen. Vielleicht habe ich auch das falsche Haus beschriftet. Der Rest der Gebäude waren damals Gärten.
bürsti
SomeoneElse (2015-08-04 13:04:40+00:00): Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158177904/history , what is a "building=hut; designation=shed"?  "designation" is supposed to be for legal classifications (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation?uselang=en-GB ).
Your Village Maps (2015-08-04 20:15:15+00:00): True, SomeoneElse. These are from my earliest days as an OSM mapper.  I haven't done edits like this in a long time now.  Today I just leave them as "generic" buildings.
tekim (2020-05-15 00:03:08+00:00): Hi Mike,

Do you have a source for the name "Harmony Reservoir" for this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23599227? It is not named on the USGS Topo and I don't think it is in the GNIS?  Perhaps it is mentioned in some city document?

Mike
tekim (2020-05-15 00:05:51+00:00): Never mind, I found this document from the City of Fort Collins that mentions it:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwi9jK3zyLTpAhUQnKwKHXhcAvsQFjABegQIAxAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcitydocs.fcgov.com%2F%3Fcmd%3Dconvert%26vid%3D192%26docid%3D1612136%26dt%3DStreet%2BMap&usg=AOvVaw2OXJl8Xak1MNzg17CoZ17e
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:35:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1704174990/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
BS97n (2020-11-19 21:48:27+00:00): Hallo, weißt du, was daraus geworden ist? Auf den Luftbildern hat sich seit 2012 kaum etwas verändert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-20 15:40:00+00:00): Jakie jest znaczenie tagu _SITE_CODE_ ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-12 09:04:02+00:00): Jakie jest znaczenie tagu _SITE_CODE_ ? Planuję go skasować jako niezrozumiały.
eggie (2021-03-05 18:07:29+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail gehad.. Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
keithonearth (2019-04-26 05:01:54+00:00): This edit adds a building called "Kadakh Renewable Energy Development Agancy" is this a typo for "Ladakh"?