piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5173844 (2019-02-10 21:08:13+00:00): Hi BCNorwich, this looks like a mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603151628#map=18/52.28773/0.06079
BCNorwich (2019-02-11 07:23:53+00:00): Hi, Indeed it was thanks ndrw6  for letting me know.

I've reverted that changset so it's now OK. I now know how it happened, I highlighted two houses to square them up and inadvertently must have had the residential area selected as well. While zoomed into the houses to orthogonalise them I missed the change to the big area.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2019-02-12 15:26:30+00:00): Dag Plav.. beter niet met de kaart schuiven in de editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op met editor iD.
Ook heb je je paden/tracks vastgeplakt aan landuse en een grens (toponym boswachterij Smilde.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-12 15:30:24+00:00): Toponym boswachterij ligt weer los.
Alan Bragg (2019-03-05 14:13:02+00:00): Roy, I like your use of trail junctions. Really nice for folks without a GPS app.
Alan
literan (2019-02-12 13:43:31+00:00): не надо придумывать выдуманные названия. Откачу.
viloan (2019-02-10 19:51:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JeroenHoek (2019-02-11 10:35:56+00:00): Het klopt denk ik wel dat de Skimerwei tertiary is, maar ik zou ook het laatste stukje tot aan de kruising met de Johannes Brandsmaweg tertiary maken.

Ik zou ook overwogen om de weg vanaf de Skimerwei, over It Holt tot aan de Westergoawei tertiary te maken, het is een doorgaande route die Deinum met de grotere wegen verbindt.
FRIESLAND123 (2019-02-11 17:07:27+00:00): Dat zijn goeie punten. Ik heb ze aangepast!
*abq* (2019-03-18 11:29:56+00:00): Der Wegverlauf des Flaunserwegs stimmt mit der Realität nicht überein.
*abq* (2019-03-18 11:38:46+00:00): Bitte nicht von Maps4bw abpausen und korrekte Wegverläufe verschlimmbessern!
*abq* (2019-03-19 12:04:19+00:00): Ich habe mittlerweile 6 Wege zurück korrigiert, deren ursprünglich korrekter Verlauf durch deinen Änderungssatz verfälscht wurden. Das muss doch nicht sein!
q_un_go (2019-03-22 19:35:30+00:00): Mach ich üblicherweise auch nicht. Allerdings sind in der Gegend leider nur sehr wenige GPS-Tracks vorhanden. Ich weiß, dass maps4bw gerade im Wald mit Vorsicht zu genießen ist, Luftbilder leider auch, sofern man den Weg durch den Wald erahnen kann. Der Hintergrundversatz gerade im bergigen Gelände kann schon mal locker bei 50m liegen.
Something B (2019-02-10 21:14:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664512279
На Esri там четко и ясно видны припаркованные автомобили. Они куда-то делись?
Юлия2605 (2019-02-11 03:32:03+00:00): Карта старая. Двор уже как три года отремонтирован, у меня в том районе брат живет. Я там часто бываю. Так же где стройка и развалины напротив мечети стоиит комплекс музейный с гостиницей, спортивным залом, подземным атриумом.. на карте этого невидно...
Something B (2019-02-11 09:09:24+00:00): Если парковки во дворе нет, уберите тег amenity = parking c https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664512279 и пересмотрите теги на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664512278
Юлия2605 (2019-02-11 18:45:21+00:00): Там по центру площадка, а вокруг парковка (верней по бокам а по узкой стороне ночью..
Something B (2019-02-11 18:50:22+00:00): Тогда на площадку вокруг leisure = playground не ставьте (достаточно amenity = parking).
Vinicio Viquez (2019-02-19 06:13:13+00:00): #C
Nikolaїch (2019-02-11 14:07:47+00:00): Можна поцікавитися звідки берете інформацію про назви вулиць?
eggie (2019-02-10 22:12:22+00:00): Je geeft aan in het voetgangersgebied motor_vehicle=designated. Dat betekent dat de weg speciaal voor motor_voertuigen is ingericht. Dat zal toch niet.
Wellicht bedoeld je motor_vehicle=destination?
Bestemmingsverkeer??
Dit was je edit.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67081865
Kijk je er nog even naar.
Ook zijn er speciale tags voor delivery
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-02-10 22:16:58+00:00): Het is zeer onwaarschijnlijk dat motor_vehicle=designated hier correct is. Denk niet dat dit voor auto's hoort te routeren. Wat is je bedoeling met deze tagging? 
Wellicht motor_vehicle=destination??
We willen met elkaar toch dat de routering een beetje blijft kloppen. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67082239
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-02-10 22:51:54+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
eggie (2019-02-11 08:21:30+00:00): ... en via het forum de volgende tip:
MemberFrom: Groningen - NLRegistered: 2015-09-07Posts: 634Email

Re: mapper zet alle voetgangersgebieden open voor motor_vehicle


In het voetgangersgebied Nijmegen geldt de mogelijkheid tot (zonder ontheffing) laden/lossen op bepaalde tijden: zie hier.
Mogelijke tag: motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa: 06:00-12:00; Su 07:00-13:00)

Taggen van bijzondere ontheffingen is onmogelijk.
eggie (2019-02-11 08:56:02+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast met de tag motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 06:00-12:00; Su 07:00-13:00)
motor_vehicle=designated verwijderd. 
Je zou nog kunnen checken of het compleet is. 
MVG,
Eggie
Hjart (2019-02-10 22:51:45+00:00): Please do not convert existing tags to the contact: scheme

Also please be aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
kadircelik (2019-02-10 23:38:16+00:00): please link that official map. Your souce says page not found
سامبا (2019-02-11 03:10:47+00:00): The sources in the tag are separated by semicolons and have to be manually copied.
Nesim (2019-08-29 10:01:08+00:00): Hatay, though in a dispute between Turkey and Syria, Hatay took the decision to join Turkey on June 29, 1939. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatay_Sorunu
eggie (2019-02-10 21:55:14+00:00): Beste GHNL,

Je hebt aan de gebouwen shop=yes toegevoegd. Dat is niet correct.
De shop= horen op de adresnodes te staan. Verder heb je zelf een gebouw ingetekend. Gebouwen worden echter geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Ik kijk even naar je edits.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-10 22:08:37+00:00): Zelf denk ik dat plein 1944 beter opnieuw geimporteerd kan worden. Er klopt niet veel meer van. Je kunt een verzoek doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Dan komen de gegevens opnieuw direct uit het Kadaster op de kaart.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
Eggie
entalle (2019-02-10 21:58:36+00:00): This is my business place
mueschel (2019-02-12 11:15:21+00:00): Hi,
could you check the spelling of your keys? It's "bicycle_parking", not "bicyle_parking".

Thanks,
Jan
colargol (2019-02-12 14:16:05+00:00): Hi Jan,

Thanks for spotting the error. This changeset has been made par the Pic4review tool (https://pic4review.pavie.info ) I've reported the bug (https://framagit.org/Pic4Carto/Pic4Review/issues/98 ) and fixed the tag (CS #67132932).

Best regards,

Jérôme
Minh Nguyen (2019-11-10 04:27:48+00:00): Remember to add access=customers to store parking lots so the “P” icons don’t crowd out POI icons. Renderers generally give parking lot icons more prominence than POI icons when they represent public lots.
GinaroZ (2019-02-12 12:55:25+00:00): Can you explain why you are "closing gaps" and also connecting the landuse to highways?
andrum99 (2019-02-12 16:16:38+00:00): The gaps are between adjacent features which are already on OSM. Since they are adjacent, it makes no sense to leave a gap between them. A good example is the many "farm land" areas, where people have put individual fields into OSM, leaving gaps where the field boundaries are. This makes no sense, since the field boundary is itself part of the farmland - it just happens that it is a field boundary rather than part of the field itself. Similarly, where a feature is adjacent to a road (or path) and there is no other feature between it and the road, then it makes more sense to join that feature to the road, rather than leave a gap. Obviously this is not always the case, so where there is another feature in the gaps I have not joined them up.
TheSwavu (2019-03-06 09:16:13+00:00): Hi,

I'm not sure what you are trying to map with highway=motorway access=no and bicycle=yes. Do you mean there are now motorways in Sydney that you can only ride bicycles on?
azakh-world (2019-02-16 23:24:11+00:00): Hi.
You make some mistakes in metro mapping. Two of them are: only one object with "railway=station" must exist at one station, and you copy these tags from a node to a building producing two such objects; a separate stop_area relation must be created for each type of transport, but you often add subway station to stop_area with bus stops.
Please be careful since public transport data is used in mapping applications and now the Lille subway is broken.
viloan (2019-02-10 23:02:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-29 08:30:05+00:00): Hallo BeKri,

warum hast Du in Wechold den place-Node ein zweites Mal hinzugefügt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6270511534
Ursprünglicher place-Node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/257145409

Gruß Roger Wilco
BeKri (2021-10-29 09:28:58+00:00): 	
Gute Frage ???
Weil ich
x   schlampig gearbeitet habe
x   nicht aufgepasst habe
O   der andere Punkt hat sich so gut versteckt, ich hab ihn nicht gefunden
O   ich fand den Ort so toll und wollte das er 2 mal in der Karte auftaucht
x   oh Gott, das ist länger als 2 Jahre her, muss erst mal Hirn entstauben
O   ich war zu müde und hätte besser ins Bett gehen sollen
O   naja, nach 5 Weißbier kann das schon mal passieren
x   es ist mir ein völliges Rätsel, was der Blödsinn sollte
O   kein Ahnung

Sorry, hab meinen natürlich raus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113114555

Danke, Gruss und happy tagging derBeKri
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-01 07:41:39+00:00): Moin BeKri,
danke für die rasche und sehr witzige Antwort! :D
Viele Grüße
metatech (2019-06-16 20:34:11+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure this track really exists on the ground ? And also the other tracks which you added around there ? Because I walked by today on "chemin n°5" and did not see them. 
The following rules of OSM "On the Ground Rule" and "Don't map historic events and historic features" recommend to map ways which are not visible anymore in "Open Historical Map".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Thanks.
robert (2019-02-13 22:42:22+00:00): https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1000249
Creet's Hill? Greet's Hill? Either way, something here deserves a not:name or an alt_name
robert (2019-02-13 22:42:23+00:00): https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1000249
Creet's Hill? Greet's Hill? Either way, something here deserves a not:name or an alt_name
SomeoneElse (2019-02-14 00:16:03+00:00): It's a tricky one - I'd normally not add not:name unless I was sure that it was wrong.  Here there's just no signage that I could see (roughly 30% of roads here have signs, I'd guess) so I added name:signed=no to the bits that I'd assumed had been correctly named "Creet's Hill" based on what the council has, as opposed to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220326218 which is just a farm dirt track and whose name was added by someone who if memory serves was one of ITO's "never mind the quality, feel the width" interns back in the day,  I'll re-add the name and named:signed=no back to the main road as far as the TV transmitter, but not to the farm track.  I was trying to remember the link to the "musicalchairs" site to work out where to keep the name on before, but forgot, and it's difficult to search for the name of something when you don't know what it's caled :)
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:00:24+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset since the only additions and changes are incorrect tags (as far as I'm aware).
jc86035 (2019-02-11 15:25:00+00:00): Please wait until the road is open.

Furthermore, please don't invent names for roads, and (in Hong Kong) use the format "[Chinese name] [English name]" in the main name tag.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 15:28:38+00:00): I've reverted this changeset.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 15:28:30+00:00): The road is not called "Rumsey st bus terminus"; as such it shouldn't be labelled that way. I've reverted this changeset except for the deletion of the closed section of the Rumsey Street Flyover.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:06:33+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset because all of the changes are incorrect for various reasons.

Issues:
• Unnamed roads do not need to be labelled with a description
• Incorrect highway=* – not a tertiary road, was previously correctly tagged as service road (part of bus terminus)
• Incorrect access tags
• Incorrect names (the bus terminus already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437544009, which is labelled "旺角（柏景灣​） Mong Kok (Park Avenue)")
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:04:47+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset because all of the changes are incorrect for various reasons.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:02:58+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset because all of the changes are incorrect for various reasons.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-07-09 08:52:19+00:00): In Vajira area, Dusit district:

"Seven eleven" n6270592388 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6270592388> is a duplicate of "7-Eleven" n6239145090 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6239145090>.

^ This part of the edit is now reverted in changeset 72044154 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72044154>. 

Bus stop n6270592389 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6270592389> is a duplicate of n6239144880 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6239144880>.

^ This POI is now merged into existing one via changeset 72044410 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72044410>.
Glassman (2019-02-11 03:35:29+00:00): Please only add features than can be verified. Your edits have been removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67085552
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-21 14:41:05+00:00): Ciao. L'edificio che hai fatto non corrisponde ad alcun edificio presente in loco ma ricalca l'intera area della cascina. Il toponomo della cascina si inserisce aggiungendo un nodo con i tag place=farm e name=... L'area della cascina si inserisce con il tag landuse=farmland. Mentre i singoli edifici con building=farm. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-21 14:40:59+00:00): Ciao. L'edificio che hai fatto non corrisponde ad alcun edificio presente in loco ma ricalca l'intera area della cascina. Il toponomo della cascina si inserisce aggiungendo un nodo con i tag place=farm e name=... L'area della cascina si inserisce con il tag landuse=farmland. Mentre i singoli edifici con building=farm. Ciao, Andrea
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:02:22+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset because all of the changes are incorrect for various reasons.
acet2ngaia (2019-02-14 00:06:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just wanted to let you know that the name field is meant for places that have an official name, like "Siebert Park." If it doesn't have a name, you can leave that field blank. The other tags are used to describe what the object is (and for other info about the object). So for this residential swimming pool, you'd tag it as leisure=swimming_pool and leave the name blank.

Try checking the help button on the right side of the screen in edit mode if you need help or would like to take the hands-on iD walkthrough!
jstratm (2019-07-18 22:39:36+00:00): Did the park close down the ring road to cars, and it is open now primarily to bikes only? I can't find evidence of that, but have not personally visited in a very long time. Given lack of evidence or explanation, I'm changing this back to a road. 

If it is indeed now a cycleway, I would expect the interior roads to also be closed to traffic. This would also make the majority of the park's amenities accessible to only bike and foot traffic. I can revert to cycleway and help clean up the rest if provided evidence this drastic change has been made to restrict vehicular access.
Glassman (2019-02-11 03:34:46+00:00): Thanks - I was just about to revert when I saw you already deleted the pokemon crap.
viloan (2019-02-11 02:17:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-02-11 02:23:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
naoliv (2019-02-11 02:31:32+00:00): Games4000, por favor, não faça testes desse tipo no mapa. Isso causa prejuízo aos utilizadores dos dados.
flohoff (2019-02-11 08:20:10+00:00): Moin,
ich habe diesen Changeset reverted. Du hast aus der Bahnhofstraße einen Zigarettenautomaten gemacht und damit war das routing kaputt.

Ich habe den komplett zurückgedreht.

Bitte aufpassen was du editierst - Das ist sofort in der Karte.

Flo
flohoff (2019-02-11 08:17:06+00:00): Moin,
guckst du dir hier das Hinterhaus der Nr. 4 nochmal an. Angeblich ist das ganze Gebäude jetzt eine "vending_machine" also ein Zigerttenautomat.

Flo
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-02-11 09:11:51+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Adres aangepast conform OSM tags.
Warin61 (2019-03-13 05:45:59+00:00): Some of these have no tags to say what they are.
AFguiderAF (2023-05-08 00:48:58+00:00): nice
skorasaurus (2019-02-18 19:52:27+00:00): 
thanks for catching this and fixing it!
abakus_uploader (2019-02-11 23:30:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Heinz_V (2019-02-15 11:42:40+00:00): You deleted  here a long road.
Please restore it!
Heinz_V (2019-02-15 21:40:26+00:00): Before you continue anny mapping : Restore the road which you have deleted!!!!
Greeshmag (2019-02-16 00:57:14+00:00): Ok. I am out of office now. I can restore it on monday. I will do it when i'm reached office. 
Thank you.
Greeshmag (2019-02-18 06:20:47+00:00): Restored the disconnected road
Miselajus (2019-02-11 17:20:09+00:00): Hallo.
du scheinst hier bei deinem building-mapping als Hintergrund die Bing-Luftbilder zu verwenden. Diese sind zwar vergleichsweise aktuell, haben hier aber einen deutlichen Versatz. Besser sind derzeit die Hintergrundbilder von Mapbox.
Die andere Möglichkeit ist, die Bing-Luftbilder anhand der bereits vorhandenen Straßen und Gebäude so zu verschieben, dass sie passen.
Gruß Miselajus