piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chachafish (2020-04-25 22:40:55+00:00): Hi, again. Could you contact me about your edits at this golf course? It looks like you deleted a large number of paths here and the reason doesn't seem obvious. Did you detect a problem with the way this was mapped? In openstreetmap we consider it important to maintain the history of objects. You can read this in the link below. Will you please respond to my message? Thank you :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
neal33 (2020-04-26 18:07:46+00:00): The reason the paths were deleted and then re-added was due to how poorly they were placed.  Same with the water in the area.  
I am recreating the course in The Golf Club 2019 and the more accurate the course/paths are laid out, the more accurate the LIDAR tool can pull the data into the game.  
If I missed any paths, please reach out and I can re-add those.  I apologize if any were missed.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-04 02:19:55+00:00): FYI, using the Rapid AI mapper is not really good practice because the quality of the traces is really poor.  I redrew a couple of them, but some are way off.
PhysicsArmature (2023-01-04 02:43:11+00:00): I thank you for your corrections to the effort.

This edit was from over 2 years ago. It is possible that the imagery I had to work with was at a lower quality. It is also possible that I could have done more with the imagery that I had at the time.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-04 03:52:53+00:00): I'm not dissing or hating on the edits.  Better than nothing, but just a heads up.  :D

It's amazing how much of a difference crisp aerial imagery makes.  Keep up the good work adding details!
VA00 (2020-05-01 10:58:25+00:00): Co z tym starym przejazdem kolejowym?
pan_borsuk (2020-05-01 12:26:49+00:00): pytasz o ul. Na Stawkach?
jeśli tak to nie istnieje narazie. usuneli płytę spomiędzy torów. ale kamerka jest.
trwa tam remont.. raczej powinien powrócić
by droga karniowicką straż mogła i leśnicy śmigać
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:00:37+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
Surveyor2503 (2020-10-03 09:03:51+00:00): Hi Supt, are you able to provide me with a source for the Ferdinand Drive extension you created in this changeset? It would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Surveyor2503
Supt_of_Printing (2020-10-03 10:33:11+00:00): Hi Surveyor2503, yes, my wife is a teacher at Rivercrest Christian College and what was their entry drive has been compulsorily acquired to become an extension of Ferninand Drive, which will, in time, be further extended to Soldiers Road.
Regards,
Supt_of_Printing.
Surveyor2503 (2020-10-07 23:03:14+00:00): Much appreciated, thanks :)
bryceco (2020-04-29 21:49:00+00:00): I understand that amenity=yes isn’t great, but amenity=office is simply wrong. It’s much closer to something like a photography studio, except they produce sculptures.
hsc666 (2020-04-25 11:53:24+00:00): Hallo julianvt und herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Auf den letzten verfügbaren Luftbildern scheinen die Tennisplätze noch zu existieren. Sind die tatsächlich jetzt weg? Falls ja, was ist dort jetzt?
VG
hsc666
julianvt (2020-04-25 12:02:03+00:00): Das gesamte Gelände ist Anfang des Jahres abgerissen und planiert worden, aktuell stehen dort nur noch die Überreste vom Clubhaus.

mfg
julianvt
Jorge Verdugo (2020-04-25 02:22:19+00:00): Razón?
Reeniz (2020-04-25 03:10:58+00:00): Técnicamente el territorio aun no pertenece a Chile. Ademas, todos los países que tienen reclamaciones en la Antartida ninguno lo incluyo dentro de sus limites.
Reeniz (2020-04-25 03:11:22+00:00): Lo mas probable es que te lo revierta alguien de otro pais
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 08:19:49+00:00): I've removed the 80 fictional parks.
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 08:43:19+00:00): Hi, your hydrant tagging indicates an above ground physical hydrant, I don't think this is the case here in the UK. What is probably there is a sluice valve that can be used by the fire brigade to erect a hydrant. If this is the case you could add the tag fire_hydrant:type=underground.
Regards Bernard.
AlwaysRJS (2020-04-25 02:51:48+00:00): Please change the trail names back to what they were. You removed all the Color descriptions in the names which are important and part of the official names.
mbethke (2020-05-08 10:49:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for your additions!
I noticed you're quite generous with the "highway=unclassified" tag. Most of those I'd say are residential streets at best - unclassified highways are usually interconnections, and something being a dead-end street is a pretty good indication that it's not on the unclasssified level.

cheers,
Matthias
user_5359 (2020-04-25 04:34:02+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5480886
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 09:26:55+00:00): Hi, regarding Way: 795840159 (New River Path). The path you have drawn is not historic nor heritage, from the website you quote the way is a new footpath. The New River itself is a heritage/historic feature. Your line looks like it is a duplicate or triplicate of other ways on this line. Could you please rectify this?
Thanks Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 09:33:17+00:00): Regarding way Stink Pipe (7443811262, v1). This is actually a vent pipe for the sewerage system and is quite likely still in use. Are your tags historic=monument and name=Stink Pipe correct and verifiable and from whence does the verifiability come?. The name is likely fiction and unless the object is listed it's not likely to be regarded as historical.
Regards Bernard.
Roadmapking (2020-04-26 19:53:31+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Stink, it's a Victorian Stink pipe, it doesn't have a use now. They were used to battle the great stink.  They are 160 years old.
Roadmapking (2020-04-26 19:54:49+00:00): I'll update all the changes made that raise a few questions, just be patient please
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 09:35:23+00:00): Removed fictional parks
mapman44 (2020-04-25 12:53:37+00:00): Thanks for all your contributions to OSM. Please note that "school grounds" area should include all the elements that are connected with the school, such as athletic fields. Here's the Wiki page that discusses that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
mapman44 (2020-04-25 04:16:00+00:00): Just a tip...you can square up the building corners by selecting it and pressing the q key.
mapman44 (2020-04-25 04:16:28+00:00): Just a tip...you can square up the building corners by selecting it and pressing the q key.
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 09:40:24+00:00): Is there a dam there? The water flows south so a dam would have water to the north which it doesn't. The waterway exits a tunnel here.
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 07:38:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A few anomalies I can see. 

First your waterway Way: 795767125 looks like it duplicates the existing waterway Way: New River (22588507), and is there really a dam (Node: 7443875485) before the tunnel (Way: New River (109624838))? You've also drawn a waterway bank (Way: 795758140) but tagged it incorrectly natural=water
water=river. You've also connected the bank to the your new and the existing canal centreline.

Regards Bernard,
BCNorwich (2020-04-25 07:49:05+00:00): Regarding the paths, your new pedestrian way Way: 795845600 runs by and joins to an existing footway Way: 294405002, are there two paths? Or maybe three, if your New River Path (Way: 795840159) is supposed to be a path. Are there really three verifiable ways here that can be seen or ascertained on the ground?

Could you please have a look at resolving these problems.

Regards Bernard.
Roadmapking (2020-04-26 16:12:24+00:00): I'll fix the problems, I was using a mobile to edit the first day, the parks I was gonna add the plots of land behind the loop line as its tfl owned and not residential, I apologize for the few mess ups I just need a day or 2 to sort everything out, it's not fully done and the river I messed up on I'll be fixing that in a moment I tried to ake it thicker,, the fire hydrant is actually below the ground the marker is on the wall I'm going to change it to a marker instead. Before moving on thank you for letting me know I've messed up a few things I'll re adjust and fix them, I'm new at this so I thought I was just saving  not adding i was going to ask someone to look over everything once I'm fully done with the area
Roadmapking (2020-04-26 16:14:39+00:00): Two paths one on each side  I'll correct the positions in a moment, also the back access of palmerston road is commercial. I apologise for the late reply, I didn't know  I had comments in my email
Roadmapking (2020-04-26 16:16:44+00:00): Does a Trail fall under the same use as foot path, the river path trail for this area spans from here to Alexander Palace do I edit the value of the  existing path or add it separately
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-25 09:29:05+00:00): Cher ami,
Merci d'avoir contribué à OSM.
La discussion a eu lien par mail.
A bientôt. Jacques
Mashin (2020-04-25 22:14:29+00:00): You've added level and roof information for Helene Grant School building. This building sees to be rebuilt (see Mapbox Satellite, Esri imagery). Are those tags for the new or old building?
SpiderMuse (2020-04-26 00:31:04+00:00): The tags are for the new building.  I live down the street from it, so I just eye balled it.  It's not called Helene Grant School anymore though. 
 It's now called the Dr. Mayo Early Childhood Center.
Mashin (2020-04-26 03:54:56+00:00): Thanks for the info. I've updated the building footprint and details.
btw. Just recently we started with New Haven/CT meetups until the epidemic started. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Haven
Discussions are held on Slack : osmus.slack.com
SpiderMuse (2020-04-26 15:07:54+00:00): No prob.  I didn't realize OSM didn't have the new building footprint, I updated the tags from the StreetComplete app.
Thanks for the meetup and wiki info.  Just found out about OSM, so looking forward to get more in it.
mapman44 (2020-04-25 12:37:40+00:00): Thanks for all your work on the river bank. Just a tip...the tag "waterway=riverbank" is being phased out, or deprecated, and will create an error in validation. This Wiki page explains the correct tags that should be used now: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Driver
relator (2020-04-25 19:17:26+00:00): Thanks for the information! 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84118775
mapman44 (2020-04-25 12:17:00+00:00): Thanks for adding all the buildings in your area. Just a note...don't put a description for the name, like "Barn" or "Shed". Instead use the correct tag for the building to denote how the building is used, like "building=barn" or "building=shed".  This Wiki page shows many building tags and how they should be used: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Hjart (2020-04-25 07:45:01+00:00): Bemærk at hvis navigation skal virke korrekt, så skal stierne forbindes med tilstødende veje og ikke blot føres ud til hvor fortovet kan ses på luftfotos.
byskov95 (2020-04-25 07:56:57+00:00): Yes. Hvis du tænker på sti nr. 795519673, så er problemet at den egentlig ikke er forbundet til vejen, der fejlagtigt hedder Mariane Thomsens Gade her på OSM. Den vej er en lukket vej, der kun kan bruges af arbejds-/lastbiler til byggepladserne Generationernes Hus og Pakhusene. Det er også en midlertidig vej, da der skal graves kanaler hvor den er, når byggerierne er færdige.

Hvis man skal være helt korrekt, så går der en sti fra sti-nr. 795519673 og ud mod bugten på siden af Havneholmen. Det er en ganske smal sti og der er flere trapper på den, som jeg ikke lige kan huske helt, hvor der er placeret.

Men min pointe er i hvert fald, at den "service road", der hedder Mariane Thomsens Gade er forkert. Den er udelukkende brugt til arbejde og man må hverken gå eller køre der som privatperson. Derfor er stien fra parken selvfølgelig heller ikke forbundet til den vej.

Idéen er, at når kanalerne er udgravet, så skal der etableres broer over dem, ca. der hvor stien nu vil ramme service-vejen Mariane Thomsens Gade. Det samme med stien over mod Lighthouse 2-byggeriet – der bliver også lavet en bro engang når byggeriet er færdigt og kanalerne er udgravet.
Hjart (2020-04-25 08:03:13+00:00): Ok, tak for forklaring. Jeg har redigeret en hel del her ud fra fotos mm, men uden dog (endnu) at have personligt kendskab til området.
Hvis servicevejens navn ikke er korrekt er du iøvrigt velkommen til at slette det (og måske sætte en beskrivelse på den)
nevw (2020-04-26 10:39:36+00:00): Hi
there appears to be a couple of errors to check in this area where you have edited recently.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.12009&lat=-27.49061&zoom=16
Let me know if you are unable to fix them.
nevw (2020-05-02 22:41:22+00:00): Hi Jonathan
can you try to fix these problems
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.11994&lat=-27.49131&zoom=16
nevw (2020-05-04 07:59:11+00:00): no response, fixed some myself and will check again later.
Jonathan M Bunker (2020-05-08 07:19:53+00:00): Thanks for fixing them, I've progressively fixed - this is a work in progress...
nevw (2020-05-08 08:35:43+00:00): ok, thanks Jonathan, keep up the fine mapping.
Constable (2020-04-25 06:39:57+00:00): source was esri aerials, not bing
apm-wa (2020-05-06 17:44:10+00:00): Дом культуры в Фарапе уже отмечен.  Удаляю точку.
map per (2021-04-04 10:51:17+00:00): Hi Lumor2020,

du hat hier mehrere Parks übereinander und auch Wohngebiete als Park eingezeichnet. (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795868678) Ich würde vorschlagen die "Parks" wieder zu löschen und z.B. durch place=locality Nodes zu ersetzen.

Viele Grüße
map per
abakus_uploader (2020-04-25 22:32:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:41:03+00:00): Please do not add driveways as golfcart paths.  Edit has been reverted (partially or in full) due to vandalism.
Rainero (2020-04-25 21:22:44+00:00): Hallo Pyrokevin112,
ich glaube, dieser Rettungspunkt ist viel zu weit nach Süden gerutscht. Die richtige Position kennst du sicher und kannst es korrigieren.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7444177679
Pyrokevin112 (2020-04-26 06:31:19+00:00): Ja Sorry sollte natürlich 49, und nicht 4,9 sein. Habe es bereits geändert.

Gruß Kevin
highflyer74 (2020-04-25 13:52:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please be so kind and avoid changesets that cover a huge area like this one.

As a little help you might be interested in the follwings link:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
------------------------------------------------------
Bonjour et bienvenue à l'OSM !

Veuillez avoir l'amabilité d'éviter les changements de lieu qui couvrent une vaste zone comme celle-ci.

Pour vous aider, le lien suivant pourrait vous intéresser :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
trial (2020-04-26 12:55:41+00:00): De plus project:mappingfornige=yes semble indiquer que vous cartographiez le Niger. la zone indiquée est bien plus large.
More over project:mappingforniger=yes seems to indicate that you map for Niger but the area is ways larger.
trial (2020-04-26 13:03:00+00:00): https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/winchevik : you miswrote some street names in addresses
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 16:58:58+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
jonorossi (2020-04-26 02:37:19+00:00): Nice work Andrew, I hope the ride was good, we'll get this park all mapped soon enough.

I fixed up the power line where you added an extra node and some nearly duplicate extra nodes on the track right next to it.
andrewfr (2020-04-26 22:25:44+00:00): Thanks Jon. I fixed that a couple of times, but it was still coming up with a validation error. I couldn't see what was wrong. It is irritating sometimes that JOSM snaps to a way.

Prout Rd is interesting territory, lots of elevation.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:41:06+00:00): Please do not add driveways as golfcart paths.  Edit has been reverted (partially or in full) due to vandalism.
Lalit Agarwal (2020-04-25 08:20:52+00:00): Yes,It is Right orrection
SomeoneElse (2020-04-25 13:43:39+00:00): Hello,
What is the source of the name:vi change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7434587 ?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-25 13:43:51+00:00): Xin chào,
Nguồn gốc của tên: vi thay đổi thành https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7434587 là gì?
Trân trọng,
Andy Townsend, thay mặt Nhóm làm việc Dữ liệu của OSM.
Carto'Cité (2020-05-10 15:37:52+00:00): Salut patman37,
Je vois régulièrement passer tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables et je dois dire que c'est très bon :)
Pour info sur ce way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40120193) où tu as retiré cycleway=share_busway à juste titre, tu peux ajouter cycleway=separate (même si là c'est limite) pour éviter que des contributeurs ne repassent dessus pour remettre le cycleway=*. Ça arrive assez régulièrement avec StreetCompete par exemple. J'aime assez cette pratique ; n'hésite pas à me dire si tu as des remarques à ce sujet.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
patman37 (2020-05-10 16:35:54+00:00): oh! je suis surveillé à distance. tant mieux ça évite que je fasse trop de bêtises. :-)
J'avais vu cette option, mais je ne l'ai jamais utilisée. Je vais y penser à l'avenir.
ces prochains jours on va surtout vérifier que les coronapistes sont bien représente.
Carto'Cité (2020-05-10 17:42:30+00:00): Super ! Merci pour ton retour :)
Je m'attends en effet à ce qu'il y ai pas mal de coronapistes dans les prochaines vérifications.
Charles
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
dieterdreist (2022-02-12 23:03:36+00:00): hi, I just noticed you deleted the school area and moved the tags to the building. I believe this is removing information, because it was already in the data that there is a school building inside a school area, but now there is only the school building and the area is gone.

Cheers,
Martin
FvGordon (2022-02-13 11:05:31+00:00): Hi, I got the Error Message from the JOSM Validator, that there are touching Outer Roles in this Multipolygon, which I repared in this CS. When I revert my changes locally, I can see, that the School Multipolygon only includes the School building, consisting of three building parts, where I made a common outline and put the attributes of th MP on it. If the School Area is more than the School Building, then the Multipolygon had to include more area - e.g. until the drawn walls, which it desn't.
Cheers
Franz
dieterdreist (2022-02-14 10:48:14+00:00): you are correct, after checking the extension of the deleted relation it did indeed not go beyond the building outline. Sorry for bothering you. I will now fix the geometry of the school.
Cheers,
Martin
David Crochet (2020-04-25 09:23:08+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour cette première contribution. N'hésitez pas à continuer.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-25 13:56:03+00:00): Hello,
Looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2417005 , you've changed "name" from a name:zh version to a name:en version.
Whilst I understand that many nations (with many different languages) have a claim here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf would suggest that the "on the ground" name (which currently here is name:zh) should be in the name tag.
More importantly - if you're going to remove a language from "name" and no "name:xx" exists for it please do add a "name:xx" tag for it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-25 13:56:34+00:00): 你好，
查看http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2417005，您已將“名稱”從名稱：zh版本更改為名稱：en版本。
雖然我了解到許多國家（使用多種語言）在這裡都要求保護https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf會建議使用“地面”名稱（目前該名稱 這是name：zh）應該在名稱標籤中。
更重要的是-如果您要從“名稱”中刪除一種語言，並且不存在“名稱：xx”，請為其添加一個“名稱：xx”標記。
最好的祝福，
Andy Townsend，代表OSM的數據工作組。
This Is A Display Name Desu (2020-04-25 14:13:41+00:00): 1. The question is what is "on the ground" on Paracel Islands? While all the island and islets have already been occupied by China, is it the same for other reefs and shoals in this relation? Initially I thought it is no when I made the edit, but after performed more search on the matter I got mixed results. Do you have any more information on this?
2. I have already copied the original name:XX value to name:zh-Hans, which represent Simplified Chinese name.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-25 14:52:38+00:00): > The question is what is "on the ground" on Paracel Islands? While all the island and islets have already been occupied by China, is it the same for other reefs and shoals in this relation?

In the case of the Paracels I suspect so - I'd be suprised if there were any "uncontrolled" reefs here.  In the case of the Spratlys I'm not sure if there is anything "uncontrolled" but there are places controlled by multiple nations there.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10820039 is a bit of a mixture of all sorts and doesn't make a lot of sense.

> Do you have any more information on this? 
What we're aware of tends to be what existing sources say (e.g. wikipedia sources) and also the press from the various countries and beyond.  Almost none of the press articles can be said to be really independent, but between the lot of them you can get an idea of what's going on.
aerasya (2020-04-25 09:42:19+00:00): #caresteouvert #covid19
eggie (2020-04-25 10:00:33+00:00): Marco.. Ziet er netjes uit. 

gewoon motor_vehicle=no taggen.. 
Tenminste conform wat op dat SBB bordje staat. 
Wanneer het niet voor moped en mofa geldt dan moped en mofa =yes (OSM ziet die categorie als motorvoertuigen) 
Ziet er verder netjes uit.
Met een lift_gate gaan de bestaande routers nog steeds verschillend om. 
Soms houden ze al per default motor_vehicle tegen.
Volgens mij gewoon motor_vehicle=no erop. 
access=forestry kan natuurlijk altijd. 
Eggie
archie (2020-04-25 10:07:51+00:00): Har du kollat med geofabrik.de varför semikolon-separerade adresser fel-markeras? Detta vore nog den mest konstruktiva vägen. I synnerhet eftersom OSMi inte felmarkerar skiljetecken såsom "-" (dash) som här https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2544583374
Innebär detta att du tänker re-tagga från rekommenderade semikolon till allt som inte felmarkeras av OSMi?