piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StreamThreader (2018-08-15 17:22:56+00:00): You right, Big thanks!
Almtesh (2018-08-14 14:56:50+00:00): En effet, merci.
abakus_uploader (2018-08-14 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
sabas88 (2018-08-14 21:08:54+00:00): WHAT KNOWLEDGE YOU USED? THAT ROAD STRETCH WAS DISMANTLED TWO WEEKS AGO
flierfy (2018-08-14 22:00:15+00:00): If this link road has been dismantled then remove the tags from the element and leave a note. It provokes a lot of questions and misunderstandings if you remove the element tracelessly.
olehz (2020-06-10 12:45:38+00:00): з чого ти взяв? настрворювали діблікатів просто море ((
LanCoPilot (2018-08-14 15:22:32+00:00): Looks Good
maxerickson (2018-10-27 19:47:34+00:00): Apparently the source data has some parking lot noise to look out for.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616957402
maxerickson (2018-10-27 19:51:41+00:00): Also, you should be checking for and dealing with existing buildings, like the one overlapped by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616955337

A good procedure is to use the JOSM validator to look for crossing buildings and then use the "Replace Geometry" tool in the utils2plugin to update the geometry and tags of the existing data with the imported data (or if the existing data is of higher quality, leave it and not import the new data).
Stypox (2018-08-14 15:04:24+00:00): I used DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery
AnGeul (2018-08-15 22:51:37+00:00): Will it be available in Snapchat map ?
ent8r (2018-08-16 17:41:21+00:00): What gets displayed on the map of Snapchat is the choice of the developers of Snapchat/Mapbox. We at OSM can not influence what they are doing.
Otherwise this would be mapping for the renderer which is strictly not allowed at OSM.
Maybe you can take a look at https://map.snapchat.com/@36.700043,3.093515,17.00z and see when it appears there. I think it might take some time (e.g. some days or up to two weeks) until it gets displayed there. I've seen some other offices in other countries and they were on the map...
But why do you want it to be visible on the Snapchat map? Maybe some other provider does fit your expectations even better..?
AnGeul (2018-08-16 19:35:53+00:00): Thank you for your answer, yeah actually I’m promoting it via Snapchat, since people in my country use that map a lot, and yes I might try other providers but for now I’m satisfied with the OSM services, let’s hope that Snapchat update it soon enough
scratera (2018-08-14 15:53:34+00:00): un palazzo che insiste su due strade anche inquesto caso non esiste...ora capisco la tua voglia di mappare ma fai le cose fatte bene per piacere altrimenti sono costretto a eliminare le tue modifiche
paolo....
Stypox (2018-08-16 11:57:36+00:00): Quale palazzo? Non capisco, scusa.
Stypox (2018-08-16 12:20:42+00:00): Ho una domanda: se ho due case completamente attaccate ma che appartengono a persone diverse (e quindi non con un tetto continuo) le devo mettere come due costruzioni connesse ma diverse o come un'unica costruzione? Guardando quello che c'è già immagino la seconda opzione.
scratera (2018-08-16 12:27:37+00:00): ...questo ti può venire in aiuto 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings#Building_parts
....edificio comunque è unico con due parti contigue...
Leo Slager (2018-08-15 07:35:05+00:00): slordig werk, het voetpad is niet verbonden met de weg. Ik verbeter het even.
Gaarne een reactie.
chnav (2018-09-23 12:23:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не двигайте береговые линии Арала т.к. они сильно зависят от сезонности (даты снимка). Водоёмы принято рисовать по высокой воде.
Спасибо.
luschi (2018-08-14 16:20:18+00:00): Hi Verdy_p,
please stop editing in this area!
As I can see, you are not a regional mapper.
If you will help, you can comment tagging in the node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1489296
thanks
EoghanM (2018-12-20 14:04:43+00:00): Thanks! This sort of classification is very helpful.
EoghanM (2018-12-20 14:09:46+00:00): Let me know if you've any similar changesets :)
mavl (2018-08-14 16:01:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 61629728, 61629743, 61629752, 61629764, 61629812, 61629827, 61629837, 61629860, 61629880.
robert (2018-08-18 15:35:57+00:00): Careful - in removing & replacing the road, you didn't restore its attributes (name, oneway-ness), breaking a match against the OS Locator dataset https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=297055

I've restored the name in my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61773338 and also re-connected the junction with the footpath to the west (if two ways don't share a "node", OSM doesn't class them as connected and therefore can't route across them). I haven't restored the oneway-ness, because I don't know whether following the area changes this is still oneway. Is it? If so please re-add a oneway tag to it.

Anyway, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Woazboat (2018-08-14 21:05:18+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for contributing and adding some missing buildings. Unfortunately it seems like you included some other changes that don't seem to be intentional (nodes/ways that are all over the world and don't have any tags).
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61662859/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61662859
Athalis (2018-08-14 16:45:38+00:00): It should be "destroyed:highway", as it's a lifecycle *prefix*, shouldn't it?
luschi (2018-08-14 16:45:59+00:00): Hello,
please stop editing in this area!
As I can see, you are not a regional mapper.
If you will help, you can comment tagging in the node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1489296
thanks
bhousel (2018-08-14 16:47:46+00:00): ok fine luschi, you fix it then.  😠
luschi (2018-08-14 16:57:15+00:00): I will not editing anything without contacting a local mapper. 
Your angry smiley does not help either
Glassman (2018-08-14 19:48:34+00:00): What kind of business is Damar Aerosystems? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office for office or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft for manufacturing like machine shops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61663016
MosDan (2018-08-14 19:58:10+00:00): Its a manufacturer of airplane parts.
Glassman (2018-08-14 20:11:47+00:00): Can you look at this list of crafts and pick the best match? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=craft#values 

We don't have a manufacture tag, except to describe buildings. With OSM you can create a better tag. Ideally it best to use an existing tag which can help it render on the map.
Владимир К (2018-08-16 06:50:26+00:00): День добрый!
не совсем понял, в чем причина отката?
joost schouppe (2020-04-27 12:00:33+00:00): These are probably "comunidades", not social facilities
rodolfovargas (2020-11-28 20:58:35+00:00): Es correcto, son comunidades.
joost schouppe (2020-11-30 13:07:20+00:00): Gracias, voy corrigiendo! Aca mis correciones: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95046944
Habia dos que no se ve nada en el imagen satelital. Lo he puesto como "fixme" (indicando "podria ser que hay un caserio aca pero no se ve")
luschi (2018-08-14 21:06:22+00:00): Hi Verdy_p, 
please stop editing in this area! 
As I can see, you are not a regional mapper. 
If you will help, you can comment tagging in the node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1489296 
you should contact regional mapper before deleting buildings or editing something you see in television!
parts of this changeset are be revertet because of incorect editing from you.
Verdy_p (2018-08-14 22:39:57+00:00): I've not deleted any building here... Others are also editing there. And even when I did it, I immediately saw edit conflicts, that were hard to solve, and once solved I've not touched the bridge at all. All buildings are still there.
Note: the alignment was initially based on another imagery but I have solved it already by using PCN 2012 as it was more accurate with the existing mapping.
The alignement was done because of various warnings on the area such as conflicting layers of superposed objects. I was as much precise as possible to match PCN 2012 and still get smooth and correct geometry
freebeer (2019-01-22 22:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66552435 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut in the middle of a road
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:48:46+00:00): removido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-14 17:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61665019 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways etc.)
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 20:07:44+00:00): “More updates than I intended”

😄 isn't that always how it happens? 😋

Thanks for giving some love to the Zoo 👍.
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 20:55:23+00:00): For http://www.osm.org/node/5832570954 (ice cream, outside the Dodo eatery), can you recall its characteristics?

Was it permanent (like a kiosk) or temporary (like a cart on wheels)?
Selling only ice cream, or other foods?
spookypeanut (2022-03-16 07:37:16+00:00): It was a permanent kiosk, and I think it only sold ice cream. Possibly drinks / crisps as well, not sure.
Protoxenus (2018-10-12 19:03:29+00:00): Also was hier im Rostocker Zoo so kartiert wurde, spottet jeder Beschreibung. Da werden Luftbilder, die  mindestens 4 Jahre alt sind, als Stein des Weisen genommen und hemmungslos danach irgendwas gemappt. 
Ich würde einfach mal gucken, wie das wirklich da aussieht.
!i! (2018-10-12 19:33:34+00:00): was meinst du konkret an meinen Änderungen?
Protoxenus (2018-10-21 18:28:40+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe mich in den Zoo begeben und ca. 40 Aufnahmen mit GNSS-Unterstützung zum halbwegs genauen Kartieren des Polariums gemacht. Es ist noch lange nicht so, wie es sein soll, aber ohne Profi-Ausrüstung kann ich da nicht mehr rausholen. 
Danach habe ich mal so in den „neuen“ Teil des Zoos gesehen und mit Erschrecken festgestellt, dass da einiges im Argen liegt.
Der ganze Zoo ist „verbastelt“ und krankt an der Multipolygonitis. Und, was noch erschreckender ist, es sind einfach grob Teile aus dem Multipolygon „Barnstorfer Wald“ ausgeschnitten um andere Dinge, die sonst im Wald liegen würden, sichtbar zu machen. Ich hatte versucht, das, was da als Karte sichtbar ist, der Realität anzupassen, bin aber gescheitert. Wahrscheinlich hilft nur noch, alles rauszuschmeißen und neu zu kartieren, weil man dem Chaos und den Ungenauigkeiten sonst nicht Herr wird.
Bestes Beispiel ist die Waldgrenze an der Südseite des Darwineums. Selbst auf dem veralteten Luftbild sieht man, dass die Wege größtenteils unter den Bäumen verlaufen, die Grenze des Polygons aber deutlich weiter südlich. Ein Blick in die Realität (mal vor Ort gucken) macht das deutlich.
Ich hatte nur noch Frust. Dass du derjenige warst, der mir das in dem Änderungssatz „vor die Flinte“ gelaufen ist, war mehr oder minder Zufall. Aber ich hatte schon ein bisschen erwartet, dass du mit deiner Erfahrung und deinem beruflichen Hintergrund etwas Besseres aus der verfahrenen Situation machen kannst.
mueschel (2018-08-15 14:44:41+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "building_levels" on 500 buildings. The correct spelling is "building:levels". Could you have a look and chang this tag?

Thanks, Jan
Алекс Мок (2018-08-15 14:51:25+00:00): Ok. Thanks,excuse me.
Leo Slager (2018-08-15 21:04:14+00:00): Graag wat meer informatie. Wat is de naam van het bedrijf ?
Matthew Darwin (2018-08-15 13:54:40+00:00): Hi Danny,
n5832594952 2840 Don Reid Drive doesn't match nearby address ranges.
SK53 (2020-02-14 14:33:11+00:00): This power line seems to have been removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166408008, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2071675#map=17/50.54706/2.82357
InfosReseaux (2020-02-15 10:19:24+00:00): Indeed, and it has been removed form osm recently.
Thanks to anyone took time to update quicker than I read your comment
All the best
SomeoneElse (2018-08-16 14:21:36+00:00): Is U4925 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31959185 really usable as a reference on that road (i.e, can someone navigate by it)?   If not, it really doesn't belong in the "ref" field (at least - that's been the concensus in GB for some years, and was recently discussed at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021690.html .  If you'd like to see "official" refs such as unsigned U refs rendered you can at e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17&lat=58.444928&lon=-4.48533 .
Best Regards,
Andy
Vclaw (2018-08-16 15:04:17+00:00): The ref tag is not just for navigation. There is no consensus for removing all of these ref tags.
trigpoint (2018-08-16 15:31:38+00:00): They have been moved, not removed. No information has been removed.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-16 15:48:37+00:00): I've just reread https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021690.html and actually there is a pretty clear consensus there.

For the avoidance of doubt (since I have moved "ref" tags to "official_ref" near me after verifying that they aren't useful as references) it's worth mentioning that I've done that only after observing that it's the clear consensus in GB and has been for some years; initially I'd suggested something like "ref:signed=no", but "official_ref" or similar clearly had more traction for these roads, even before the most recent edits.

No data's been lost; renderers can still show them if they wish.
tms13 (2018-08-20 19:38:21+00:00): Well, if that's what's going to happen, it needs the tag wiki for 'ref' and any replacement tag to explicitly say when to use the standard tagging and when to use the new tagging - preferably with plenty of time to update editors, renderers and any scripts that group results by road, before such changes take place, surely?
user_5359 (2018-08-15 17:35:25+00:00): Hello! You use on node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5832668548 (only as example) the not standard tags 
COMMUNITY_=WELLFLEET
COUNTY=BARNSTABLE
FULL_NUMBE=20
GEOGRAPHIC=WELLFLEET
OBJECTID=610151
PC_NAME=WELLFLEET
POSTCODE=02667
STREET_NAM=MOUNTAIN AVENUE
cty_town=BARNSTABLE, WELLFLEET
Please use the standard keys for an address.

I you need help, You are welcome.
Alan Bragg (2018-08-15 20:05:38+00:00): My mistake. Thanks for the notice.
mzioma (2018-08-16 13:50:14+00:00): Proszę o zapoznanie się z dokumentacją do czego służy oznaczenie krawężnika: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:barrier=kerb 
OSM to nie jest Minecraft, do tworzenia nowej rzeczywistości :)
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6677/how-to-tag-the-boundary-line-of-a-tennis-courtsoccer-field-etc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-14 17:34:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 61663846, 61663901.
GerdP (2019-03-27 12:55:25+00:00): Hi, 
I wonder why you create the ele tags with such a high precision? The normal usage is to round them to meters.
Adamant1 (2018-08-18 13:56:54+00:00): Perhaps Crystal River Preserve State Park shouldn't be a park either? The boundary seems a little arbitrary and long in the tooth on the west side if nothing else.
Adamant1 (2018-08-18 13:58:30+00:00): If nothing else, seems like the Pokemon Go people have been calming down with their #vandalism lately at least.
freebeer (2018-08-19 06:26:04+00:00): m-m-maybe.
until you encounter an #abomination like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/16.42803/103.49939&layers=D
which is just #wrong in so many ways without even considering ground-truth.
or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61779551#map=18/42.20527/-75.87390&layers=ND
.
this nearby case is no pokémon, but simple mis-tagging that should be corrected, as can be seen from the nearby notes - pre-pokemon beginner error, not deliberate vandalism.
the name including both Reserve and State Park make it clear the osm (city) park is not applicable, and i read a recent DWG statement from Andy Townsend that made it clear where the osm tag does not apply (if you  can find the statement, it would be great to link it in  the wiki as a definitive reference).
Carnildo (2018-08-15 05:23:27+00:00): When you're editing in Spokane County, Esri World Imagery is far sharper and better-aligned than the other options, and is nearly as new as Bing or DigitalGlobe Standard.
Farkad5 (2018-08-15 17:13:55+00:00): Ok
Carnildo (2018-08-15 05:37:24+00:00): You might want to work on your aim.  A number of the crossings you've added recently have been close to, but not actually on, the point where a pedestrian way intersects the road.
Farkad5 (2018-08-15 17:19:08+00:00): corrected
abakus_uploader (2018-08-14 22:30:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Howpper (2018-08-15 06:15:07+00:00): Please us ESRI world imagery in Spokane area and Mapbox imagery for Coeur d'Alene area.
Farkad5 (2018-08-15 17:27:23+00:00): ok
LorenzoStucchi (2018-08-19 14:19:33+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Ti consiglio di inserire all'interno del changeset una descrizione le modifiche che hai fatto così a tutti è chiaro cosa hai aggiunti. Ciao, buonagiornata
Spanholz (2018-10-16 12:59:09+00:00): What exactly is the Brimstone ATV you mapped in this changeset as tourism=attraction?
TheDutchMan13 (2018-09-14 03:36:02+00:00): Please don't forget to add a descriptive changeset comment so the rest of the osm community knows what you edited :)
RicoElectrico (2018-08-19 19:33:23+00:00): Cześć, dwie sprawy:


1) Nie używamy przedrostka Ulica, poza tym nazwa powinna być spójna z innymi kawałkami ulicy.

Polecam do przeczytania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

2) Jesteś pewien, że ten kawałek to rzeczywiście Wojskowa? To obecność tabliczki z nazwą ulicy decyduje, a nie adresy do których prowadzi.
Patrzałem na serwisie mapowym UM Warszawy i ten kawałek figuruje jako nienazwany.
StreetComplete pyta o nazwy ulic, co nie znaczy, że zawsze należy ją podać.
RicoElectrico (2018-08-19 19:34:39+00:00): Póki co ujednoliciłem nazwę usuwając przedrostek "Ulica", a co do punktu 2, to jako osoba z wiedzą lokalną Ty możesz się wypowiedzieć :)
Supaplex (2018-08-15 17:58:38+00:00): duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198637969
it is already there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61666993
geri-oc (2018-09-09 08:53:05+00:00): Könntest du bitte im Forum schauen, warum soviele Relationen defekt sind?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63668
Bicycle Tourer (2018-09-10 00:20:11+00:00): Ich habe versucht, nachzuvollziehen, was das im Forum angesprochene Problem bzw. die Ursache ist. Die Open Cycle Map kenne ich nicht, insofern kann ich nicht einschätzen, ob sich dort nachvollziehbar etwas geändert hat. Was OSM selbst angeht (Relationen), ist der im Forum im Beispiel benannte vermeintlich fehlende Weg nie Bestandteil der monierten Relation gewesen (was andere dort bereits ausgeführt haben). Ich konnte im Forum auch kein anderes Beispiel finden, in dem konkret benannt wurde, welche Wege aus welchen Routen verschwunden sind --- auch deshalb ist bisher für mich nicht klar, was eigentlich das Problem ist.

Zur Erläuterung des vorliegenden Changesets: Beim "Aufräumen" der im Betreff benannten Relation sind 3 Wege gesplittet worden, da nur Teilmengen dieser Weg von der Relation genutzt werden, die Route also herausstehende Wegstücke hatte:
32661591->32661591+617004451
116524101->116524101+617004452
137207162->137207162+617004450
Da diese drei Wege ein ganzes Stück voneinander entfernt sind, sieht dieser Changeset räumlich "ziemlich umfangreich" aus, aber es sind nur diese 3 ways. Keiner davon liegt zwischen Rauenberg und Heidelberg, sondern alle weiter östlich. Der mittlere way (in Kleingemünd) war von fünf weiteren Relationen benutzt, die sich durch den Split natürlich geändert haben und deshalb im Changeset auftauchen. Diese Änderungen werden von JOSM aber automatisch ausgeführt, so dass diese Relationen gar nicht von mir selber editiert wurden.

Was "Aufräumen" generell bedeutet, ist in diesem Forums-Topic ausführlich geschildert: [url]https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63556[/url]. Konkret bedeutet es, dass in der explizit editierten Relation höchstens "Dead Ends", also einzelne überstehende Wege, die nach einem Split aus der Relation "herausgestanden" haben, gelöscht wurden. Das kann kein Loch in vielen Relationen nördlich von Rauenberg verursacht haben.
VG
Bicycle Tourer
mueschel (2018-08-21 13:19:01+00:00): Hi,
kannst du diesen Knoten mal überprüfen, der Tag "amenity_w =dismount" scheint ein Fehler zu sein.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4582274670

Gruß, Jan
Heinz06 (2018-08-21 13:38:59+00:00): Ja, danke - habe ich entfernt.
TheEditor101 (2018-08-15 07:32:45+00:00): Since you've surveyed this, is it safe to update the `lanes` from 1 to the `proposed:lanes` value of 2?

I assume the maxspeed isn't 40 mph anymore too?
tms13 (2018-08-15 20:18:19+00:00): I surveyed on Sunday evening (when it definitely was 1 lane and 40 mph) - it was supposed to open fully today, but I'm not in a position to resurvey (about 150 miles away, sorry).
TheEditor101 (2018-08-16 16:06:26+00:00): No worries, thanks for the reply!
Hjart (2018-08-14 19:48:25+00:00): Hvorfor ændrer du til fra "gravel" til "unpaved"?
JanLoDK (2018-08-14 19:54:51+00:00): Da jeg ændrede den sidst må jeg ved et uheld have fået valgt gravel, i stedet for unpaved.
Det er så vidt jeg mindes en typisk vej på landet, der ikke er asfalteret, men er delvis jord, grus, sten og så videre.
Jeg synes derfor at unpaved er mere passende og mere i tråd med hvad jeg ellers har set.
Hjart (2018-08-14 20:05:31+00:00): Jeg spørger fordi jeg selv netop har tagget et stort antal veje som gravel (inklusive flere af dem du har ændret), for at angive at de ikke er rene jordveje (unpaved)
JanLoDK (2018-08-14 20:14:43+00:00): Ok... Det er noteret og giver god mening. 
Min udfordring at jeg som regel spotter ikke-asfalterede veje når jeg kører auto-genererede ruter (vha. Kurviger app'en) på min motorcykel.
Jeg laver så et hurtigt bogmærke i app'en, inden jeg skal køre videre og har derfor ikke tid og mulighed for at tage detaljerede notater.
På et senere tidspunkt følger jeg så op på de bogmærker jeg har lavet og ændrer de veje jeg har fundet til unpaved vha. Vespucci. 

I Kurviger app'en har jeg slået unpaved roads fra, hvorfor jeg ved at der er en "fejl" eller mangel i OpenStreetMap, når jeg støder på en ikke-asfalteret vej.

Skal jeg rette vejen tilbage til gravel?