piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-09-02 10:05:30+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping are not that accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor
This task 1293,  has been invalidated to give you the opportunity to improve your mappings here.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-30 13:13:31+00:00): Ciao Michele, vedo tanti problemi in questo changeset. Innanzitutto il tag highway=traffic_signals si mette dove c'è una intersezione (sistema più semplice). Poi il tag crossing=unmarked indica che le strisce pedonali non sono segnate per terra, il che, dalle foto satellitari e da quelle di mapillary di 10 giorni fa, non è vero. traffic_calming=table significa che c'è sempre un rialzo lungo in corrispondenza delle strisce che serve a far rallentare gli automobilisti. Tu lo hai aggiunto a tutti gli attraversamenti pedonali e questo mi sembra poco plausibile. Ciao, Andrea
mikki65 (2020-08-30 22:33:05+00:00): ho  corretto strisce pedonali
highway=traffic_signals si mette dove c'è una intersezione (sistema più semplice). questo non l ho capito
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-31 06:35:05+00:00): Dove c'è un incrocio.
mikki65 (2020-08-31 08:23:38+00:00): ok ma hai corretto  gia' te? perche' non capisco dove ho sbagliato
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-31 08:29:53+00:00): Sì, ho corretto io. Prima il semaforo è spostato più a sud sulla strada.
olehz (2020-08-31 05:41:39+00:00): STOP DO THIS FUCKING "IMPROVEMENTS"!!!
Martin Borsje (2020-08-30 05:29:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-30 05:34:06+00:00): Ik heb naar je eerste edit gekeken.
De opmerking 'gewijzigd' beschrijft natuurlijk niet echt wat je gedaan hebt: elke edit is een wijziging immers!
De toevoegingen dat het kanaal niet intermittent is en niet zout zijn op zich niet onjuist, maar in Nederland niet echt 'nodig' natuurlijk; je kunt het laten staan, maar er is geen noodzaak alle kanalen, rivieren e.d. in Nederland zo te taggen.
Map ze!
Nakaner (2020-08-31 07:24:54+00:00): Hallo,

könntest du beim Hochladen von Änderungssätzen künftig bitte einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar angeben? Das Feld ist nicht dazu da, um es einfach mit einem Bindestrich zu befüllen, nur damit die Software keine Fehlermeldung anzeigt. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90122933
Leo Slager (2020-08-31 11:03:24+00:00): Dag Gerard, 
Dat access=permit suggereert dat het geen openbaar voetpad is. Ik neem aan dat dat niet correct is.
De editor iD suggereert dat je van alles moet invullen, maar dat is niet het geval.
Op een footway is foot=yes, bicycle=no, motrovehicle=no dus overbodig.
Een footway is alleen voor voetgangers en dus hoef je verder niets in te vullen.
ik pas het even aan.
jptolosa (2020-08-30 07:25:34+00:00): Usualmente la palabra "Cerro" forma parte del nombre oficial de un pico de montaña en Chile. Por lo tanto eliminarla implica una pérdida de información.
Reeniz (2020-12-08 22:07:39+00:00): En el mismo enlace que proporcionas de la wiki sale algunos uso incorrecto como "Montaña Foobar, 8000 pies". Haciendo alucion a que es incorrecto agregar la elevacion del pico, pero no asi la palabra "Montaña" que sería el uso similar que se le da a pico, cerro, monte, etc.

"«Montaña Foobar, 8000 pies»»: etiqueta la altitud en una etiqueta independiente (como ele=* o ele:ft=*), no como parte del nombre" 

Creo que "Nombre es solo el nombre" aplica mas a los caso de los cerros en OSM que estan Sin nombre y se le agrege la palabra "cerro" solamente.
Reeniz (2020-12-08 22:09:12+00:00): Por ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4108103004
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-06-26 22:03:24+00:00): Lucas, de onde voce tirou que esse trecho existe? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7856918234
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-06-27 01:48:05+00:00): já excluí o trecho
lefuturiste (2023-07-28 10:02:03+00:00): petit easter-egg
Frans S (2020-08-31 15:03:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark.
buildings should show a shadow  next to it.
When there is no shadow, it is obvious that the object is not above groundlevel, so no building. All objects here are no buildings.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Cebderby (2020-09-12 10:52:04+00:00): I have removed the abandoned:highway you wrongly added in this changeset and reinstated the noexit=yes you wrongly removed.  There are no abandoned roadways here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
and review and correct any other use of this prefix or false additions you have made in this manner
marczoutendijk (2020-09-08 15:25:32+00:00): Why did you rename the lake?
kapazao (2020-09-04 10:29:50+00:00): Si hay una minirotonda aquí (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=257651794) será más bien en sentido antihorario, ¿no?
Seraq (2020-09-04 11:32:48+00:00): hay una minirotonda que han hecho este verano. Razón tienes...
Solucionado

Muchas gracias,
Seraq
Alecs01 (2020-10-18 14:54:36+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che sia giusta così l'area della riserva? A parte il "buco" rimasto nell'uso del suolo, la riserva naturale dovrebbe essere questo intero perimetro, come era prima: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234076656/history mentre ora sono esclusi prati e campi all'interno https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9952846
Jrachi (2020-10-18 15:17:20+00:00): Ho fatto due modifiche in due mesi.
Nella prima ho considerato che il poligono esterno doveva essere leisure.

Come multipoligono forest diceva solo che era tutto un bosco ed escludeva (da un punta di vista strettamente informatico) le parti interne.
Però in effetti si è perso l'informazione sul landuse.
Ho corretto duplicando la relazione in modo da avere il forest separato dal confine.
E poi togliendo gl'inner dalla riserva.

Il problema è per come è stato creato questo multipoligono. Cioè come area di bosco coincidente con il confine della riserva.
Sarebbe più corretto creare le aree di bosco e poi creare il confine della riserva attraverso i boschi, come effettivamente è.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:38:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90124154
marczoutendijk (2020-09-08 15:15:21+00:00): What does "eee" stand for?
marczoutendijk (2020-09-08 15:14:28+00:00): What is the meaning of "hh"?
Mr_Rose (2020-08-29 16:27:09+00:00): CS: Přesunuta původní "Waterway Feature" tak, aby reprezentovala splav. Přidány informace o splavu. Splav upraven aby směřoval správným směrem a odpovídal satelitním snímkům.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-30 12:07:23+00:00): Ciao Ivo. Perché cancelli i tracktype=grade1? Ciao, Andrea
Jrachi (2020-08-30 12:09:22+00:00): Conseguenza logica.
Se ho surface = sand o gravel o altro non può essere grade1.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-30 12:14:17+00:00): E' più facile che sia sbagliato il valore del tag surface. Prima tutta una serie di valori per surface non esistevano ed è abbastanza difficile per il mappatore italiano distinguere tra gravel, fine_gravel e compacted.
Jrachi (2020-08-30 12:17:55+00:00): Quindi ci sono tre alternative:
1) aggiungere un fixme e convivere con un dato errato
2) andare a girare il pianeta a piedi.
3) Tenere il tracktype e cancellare il surface.

Ma il tracktype è definito come una miscela di parti dure e parti molli. Lo trovo veramente difficile da valutare di persona, figuriamoci su ortofoto.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-30 12:30:05+00:00): Fixme non si dovrebbe usare per errori che sono già rilevati da tool di QA. Quindi lascerei le cose come sono, nell'attesa che qualcuno faccia una nuova survey.
Jrachi (2020-08-30 12:38:37+00:00): Non mi piace.
Ma mi piego alla volontà del mio sensei.
mueschel (2020-08-31 17:27:39+00:00): Please check the names - something went wrong with the tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7856983555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7856983541
(and possibly more)
Ogloppi (2020-08-31 19:13:02+00:00): Checked and corrected all of them
wojtas82 (2020-09-14 19:30:29+00:00): Czy możesz usunąć myślnik z REF z Błękitnej trasy rowerowej? Albo jest ref albo nie, nie dajemy myślników jak ich brak.
Marek-M (2020-09-14 20:41:51+00:00): Cześć, jasne, że mogę to zrobić. Wg https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/3725184 w dniu March 4, 2020 11:23 PM dorzucił go skradacz chociaż nie wiem z jakiego powodu. Numeru REF dla tej trasy nie znam, edytowałem wyłącznie geometrię trasy.
aceman444 (2024-08-13 23:22:55+00:00): Hi, how is this a bike path? You didn't tag any tags allowing bicycles on this path. How do you know from aerial photos, that this is a path for bikes?
If some Strava users cycle here, it does not make it legal.
cikicaki (2024-08-14 04:40:32+00:00): When I was there four years ago, it looked like an illegal cyclo-cross racing track. I'm not sure about the current status.
GerdP (2025-08-08 07:50:04+00:00): Moin!
Ich frage mich gerade, warum ich auf Luftbildern von 2023 an dieser Stelle https://www.osm.org/node/7856995860 keine Straße sehe. Den Knoten hast Du schon 2020 eingetragen. Ich sehe da auf allen Luftbildern nur Acker.
Verwirrte Grüße, Gerd
GerdP (2025-08-23 07:35:50+00:00): Hat sich wohl erledigt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170258093
brianboru (2021-01-21 13:56:22+00:00): Is the upgrade to landuse=construction based on a survey? I ask because the NCN cycle route has not been diverted and any vegetation clearance is not shown. Also I understand the current construction is groundworks so the actual construction of the rail has yet to start so the way for HS2 should still be proposed not construction, especially over landuse that is not yet tgged as construction. Please slow down and map what is on the ground
mfolle (2020-08-30 05:30:21+00:00): Salve julialanghinotti, percebi que tu colocaste as construções da Vila Mantelli marcadas como landuse ao invés de buildings então corrigi pra você.
Ademais recomento fortemente o tutorial do editor que ele tem umas boas dicas
mikini (2020-09-15 00:05:34+00:00): Stedet hvor der skete "absolut ingen ting"?![1] Må besøge det ved lejlighed ;).

Fandt du Dambos Anker Drømmefanger[2] mens du var på besøg? Var forbi nogle af hans trolde på Sjælland på en sofamappetur for nylig[3], men kunne ikke grave frem hvor den nye på Fanø er placeret. Der skulle være et spor på trollmap.com[4], for de interesserede.
-- 
Mikkel

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7857135525
[2]: https://ugeavisen.dk/esbjerg/artikel/fan%C3%B8s-troldegave-er-endt-p%C3%A5-lossepladsen
[3]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11600107
[4]: https://trollmap.com/#/@55.449x8.4075z16
aachso (2020-08-31 01:07:40+00:00): Hallo @stetux und willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn die Firma nicht das gesamte Gebäude einnimmt, bitte eine Node im Gebäude für das Büro erstellen und nicht das Gebäude selbst dafür ändern. Da das hier sehr wahrscheinlich nicht der Fall ist, bitte wieder rückgängig machen.

"Sachverständiger" ist eine Beschreibung und sollte nicht in den Namen. Stattdessen bitte office=surveyor verwenden.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen und schönen Gruß
user_6110846 (2022-08-09 07:31:14+00:00): нащо підписуєш назви зупинок  в Західній Україні російською мовою ти шо взагалі охуїв
sandroz (2022-08-24 13:09:52+00:00): Піздуй в Малин. Не тобі мене вчити бидло.
user_6110846 (2022-08-25 04:35:41+00:00): ти сосеш хуй русского мира тому ти і є бидло і дешевка
user_5359 (2020-08-30 10:59:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
ottwiz (2020-08-29 17:49:45+00:00): Maxar offset is 7.46; 3.28 to Bing imagery
user_5359 (2020-08-30 10:55:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add religion and denormination (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:religion) to the church.
AntMadeira (2020-08-30 00:54:59+00:00): Olá, Ricardo.
Outra vez o chato...

Tive de reverter este teu conjunto de edições porque desfizeste a relação da IC 8 e aumentaste a complexidade do cruzamento em causa.
Em primeiro lugar, aconselho-te a fazeres conjuntos mais pequenos (ou do mesmo tipo e na mesma zona), porque se algum tiver de ser revertido, não terá de ser tudo desfeito.
É uma das regras básicas do OSM.
Em segundo lugar, aconselho-te a colocares comentários nos conjuntos de edições. É uma questão de bom senso e de respeito pela comunidade. Ajuda outros mapeadores e outros utilizadores do OSM a perceber o que foi feito e alterado.
Em terceiro lugar, nenhum de nós nasceu a saber mapear no OSM. Todos nós fomos aprendendo errando, mas também a ouvir os outros e a fazer perguntas. É para isso que serve o canal de Telegram, mas também os comentários a cada uma das edições que os mapeadores fazem.
Em quarto lugar, aconselho-te a analisares o cruzamento da IC 8 que tinhas alterado. Lembra-te que fazer duas linhas significa que estás a fazer duas estradas. Só quando há separação física é que se deve separar, salvo em casos raros e em situações específicas. No caso do cruzamento em causa, todas as instruções de viragem e de via da estrada estão nas linhas. Podes consultá-las (antes e depois do cruzamento) para tentares perceber todas as etiquetas envolvidas. Se tiveres dúvidas, não hesites em contactar-me por mensagem privada ou lá no Telegram, se preferires.

Cumprimentos,
António.
user_10969214 (2020-08-30 01:05:45+00:00): Boas. Em relação a esse cruzamento as vias separam-se portanto como é costume de se fazer fazem-se duas vias, uma para cada lado. Eu achei que estava correto já que é assim que se faz normalmente, mas agradeço o aviso. 

Cumprimentos
AntMadeira (2020-08-30 01:17:23+00:00): Atenção ao conceito de via:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:lanes

Chamo a atenção para a imagem que está nessa página:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Faixa_de_Rodagem.png

Uma linha no OSM representa uma estrada (faixa de rodagem) e não uma via.
jimkats (2020-09-03 12:49:58+00:00): Did you just copy/paste the building? That looks like it xd (and it's misaligned with the Bing imagery, I verified that with GPS approximation when I walked by)
sinsen (2020-09-23 05:59:58+00:00): This highway is from Thoppur and terminates at Erode city running for a length of 94km. But here it is marked as terminating at bhavani. It needs correction. In Morth and nhai official website statistics, it is 94km.
Heinz_V (2020-09-26 07:30:09+00:00): Thanks, I made corrections
pio2_122 (2020-08-29 19:43:59+00:00): Please do not edit using uncalibrated and often outdated layers.
The only calibrated layer in Poland is "Geoportal2".

These buildings have been imported from official data and match the "Geoportal2" layer.

___
Changeset has been reverted.
Stereo (2022-01-30 00:08:11+00:00): Moien! D'Weichen hu geännert, wou has du deemols d'Referenznummere fonnt? Merci a schéine Weekend, Guillaume
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-30 06:50:44+00:00): Hi kocgolf, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting a completely mapped golf course of a different contributor? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=90127920

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
kocgolf (2020-08-30 14:02:16+00:00): Thank you for checking! It's good to know this service is monitored for legitimate changes! I play this course regularly. In this case, the course was redesigned by the phenomenal Coore Crenshaw team 2 years ago to bring it back closer in line with the original master Tillinghast design. You can see the new routing, bunkering, and tree changes in the satellite images. In fact, it's IN redesign in the current images.
user_8466505 (2020-09-01 05:58:05+00:00): Well, even though the map is monitored, a few changes tend to slip through the cracks. It’s good to know that we have people like you who like to improve places based off of their local knowledge.

Good job, and keep it up!
TheAdventurer64
skfd (2020-10-04 06:22:05+00:00): Привет! Я перемапил по вот етой статье https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dsector
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90127954
Velikodsky (2020-10-04 12:02:06+00:00): Гуд! Спасибо!
VictorIE (2020-09-02 16:07:30+00:00): Please stop sabotaging the map.

Please reverse the changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832228504/history
EdLoach (2020-08-30 12:11:27+00:00): Hi. Are you sure about the bus stop name change from Coopers End to Car Rental Village? All the opendata and timetables that include the stop still refer to it as Coopers End (they could of course be out of date if the change is recent). e.g. the 309 https://bustimes.org/services/309-bishops-stortford-stansted-airport and 509 http://www.travelinesoutheast.org.uk/se/TTB/EFA02__00006ca5_AS.pdf - also if you have surveyed the stop it would help to remove the naptan:verified=no tag (and add a not:name=Coopers End tag if you're sure about the name change), so the sort of validation tools that compare OSM data and opendata don't flag it as a discrepancy. Thanks. Ed
beatpoet (2020-08-30 12:34:25+00:00): I messed up, wrong bus stop, apologies!
maraf24 (2020-08-31 10:32:35+00:00): I to na podstawie zdjęć z Geoportalu?
ajf3934221 (2020-08-30 14:16:11+00:00): Hallo Lameth, 

super, vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen in Open StreetMap.

Da Du ein Review angefordert hast gebe ich kurz Rückmeldung zu zwei Dingen die mir aufgefallen sind: 
- den Namen würde ich genau so wie auf der Webseite angegeben hinterlegen
- die E-Mail-Adresse des Frisörs könnte dann wahrscheinlich raus.

Aber sonst, superle! Falls Du sonst noch Fragen hast gerne melden. 
Grüße, 
Andy
mueschel (2020-08-31 17:30:08+00:00): Du hast hier ein paar neue Tags erfunden, die nicht dokumentiert sind und auch nirgends sonst verwendet werden, bitte versuche nur die Tags zu verwenden die im Wiki stehen oder im Editor vorgeschlagen werden.

service:bicycle:fitness
service:bicycle:gravel
eserte (2020-08-30 17:11:00+00:00): Als Radfahrer empfinde ich die Änderung von unhewn_cobblestone nach sett im Königsweg als unpassend. "sett" ist eher das typische Berliner Groß- oder Kleinsteinpflaster, was hier allerdings nicht liegt.
peteror (2020-08-30 19:36:53+00:00): Der Übergang ist sicherlich fließend, aber ich sehe da schon behauene Steine. Die Gesamtqualität ist schlecht, aber die einzelnen Steine sind nicht natürlich und abgerundet, wie sie es bei unhewn_cobblestone sein müssten. Die   "Qualität" findet sich an einigen anderen Stellen in Berlin auch noch - zumeist steht da noch "cobblestone" dran, was ja der Überbegriff ist.
peteror (2020-08-30 19:50:12+00:00): Wäre mir aber wichtig, wenn wir das klären könnten - ich mache nach und nach Erkundungen in Zehlendorf und Dahlem bzgl. Kopfsteinpflasterqualität (bin auch Radfahrer) und da wäre ein einheitlicher Standard für die Einstufung schon wichtig.
eserte (2020-08-31 19:01:55+00:00): Nun, ich bin etwas ratlos, was die Qualitätskategorien bei OSM angeht. Ich bin ja der Autor eines sehr alten Berliner Radroutenplaners und habe ein genaues Gespür für Fahrbahnoberflächen entwickelt. Leider passt das nicht damit zusammen, wie bei OSM getaggt wird. Die Kombination sett+smoothness=bad wird häufig für ordentlich verlegtes Berliner Großsteinpflaster verwendet, manchmal auch smoothness=intermediate oder auch surface=cobblestone. Der Königsweg ist auf jeden Fall eine Kategorie schlechter (sprich: kaum ein Radfahrer würde hier noch freiwillig auf der Fahrbahn fahren), und das ist bei sett+bad nicht mehr ersichtlich.
peteror (2020-08-31 19:52:08+00:00): Ich habe genau dasselbe Problem mit meiner angepassten Kostenfunktion für einen anderen Fahrrad-Router. Aber wenn man sich an die Definitionen hält, müsste das "normale" Berliner Kopfsteinpflaster (Bsp. Ringstraße in Lichterfelde, Ostabschnitt) als sett+smoothness=intermediate getagged werden. smoothness=bad bleibt dann für sowas wie die Königstraße/Königsweg. Ist eine etwas grobe Einteilung für Radfahrer, aber mehr ist m.E. nicht drin mit den vorhandenen Tags. Ich verfahre jetzt erstmal so, dass ich vorhandene Tags nicht mehr ändere und nur dort was ergänze, wo etwas fehlt (oder offensichtlich falsch ist). Was mit dem Königsweg passiert, ist mir nicht so wichtig - ich weiß ja schon, dass ich da nicht langfahren will.
Frans S (2020-08-30 08:34:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Sorry to say, but your mappings lacks accuracy
Please zoom in that far that you see the corners and can put the nodes on the correct place. Always square the building with the Q key.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90128751
Frans S (2020-08-30 08:27:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
I only have my doubts about the small objects  on the ground, mapped as a building, but without a proof that the object is above ground level. Buildings gives a shadow. Please open this task again (1092) and remove them when it is clear it's not a building
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90128905
Frans S (2020-08-30 08:15:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
See my remarks on the other changeset.
Please use the tag 'path' rather than 'footway' whish is more to be used in urban areas, parks etc. dedicated for walking. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90129816
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:38:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90129968
tlcd (2026-05-13 10:00:21+00:00): Le tag access = no se réfère aux restriction légales d'accés (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access)
Il n'y a pas ici d'interdictions pour les vélos.
La praticabilité physique (critère subjectif qui dépend du niveau des pratiquants) des sentiers pour les vélos se gère plutot avec le tag mtb:scale (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:mtb:scale)
trigpoint (2020-08-31 15:44:50+00:00): Hi, I assume you mean the demo map on OSM.org, remember that is just one rendering of the OSM database and you should not worry about how something looks. The main thing is that what is in the database is correct.

The problem is that things are close together here and there is not space to fully render everything so the rendering software has to decide what to show,

Navigation apps such as OSMand will find it and it does render on openstreetmap.fr which has tiles rendered at zoom 20, whereas osm.org only renders to zoom 19.

HTH Phil