piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2021-11-05 15:13:32+00:00): hei … I'm not interested in reverting your work, I wish to help you provide useful edits to the community.  the question **why** still stands: maybe you know something that I don't know.
if you're just interpreting aerial pictures and changing classification based on how the road looks like: that's very likely a bad idea outside urbanised USA and Europe.
mariotomo (2021-11-05 15:23:05+00:00): (there's lots of things you can do as a remote mapper, to help OSM in Panamá.  joining road segments and reclassifying objects are not among them.  adding houses in rural areas is a much better idea, or exploring unmapped areas and adding roads as unclassified or path, as we've mentioned in the Telegram group from time to time. or come to the group and let's compare your mapping preferences with the local mappers and the available information.)
Trevor_1 (2021-11-05 17:23:53+00:00): This was a year ago, but I think I was just going off the imagery
mariotomo (2021-11-05 19:45:12+00:00): The point that I am trying to make: please do not reclassify roads that were classified by a local person, unless you have visited it in person, or if you have a fair understanding of and familiarity with the place. Always first check with any local community.
Trevor_1 (2021-11-05 19:52:34+00:00): Ok, I'll remember that from now on
eggie (2020-09-14 05:57:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Alle adressen en gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster.
Nr 30 staat al op het pand ernaast.
Blijdensteinstr 1 is nu verdwenen.
Wanneer nr 1 niet zou bestaan kun je dit het beste doorgeven aan het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=W.A.%20Scholtenstraat%2030&resultOffset=0&objectId=0106200000028182&geometry.x=234703&geometry.y=558541&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0106010000028182

Adresnode 1 heb ik teruggezet. Het beste kun je de originele BAG node nr 30 gebuiken mits dat ook Garage Jos is.
Doe je zelf een terugmelding als de nummering hier niet klopt  anders gaat het met periodieke updates toch weer verkeerd. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 06:03:14+00:00): Er is nu nog één vermelding van de garage.. (aangepast)
Dus niet dubbel taggen. 
Check nog even hoe dat zit met de adressen en anders een terugmelding naar het Kadaster.
Je zou het ook als 30R kunnen taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
joost schouppe (2020-09-17 13:07:34+00:00): Hi,
Your profile page mentions your account shouldn't be used for editing - yet here you are, editing :)
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-01 03:52:56+00:00): Hello Kay7. Your edit looks awesome, but I need to delete the building due overlapping with other building (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30235/task/142649084). Thank you.
JesseFTW (2020-09-13 23:56:19+00:00): Please don't mix edits over such a long distance, as it creates very large changeset bounding boxes, that make it harder to review changes.
ralley (2020-09-14 05:59:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edit.  If you are looking to add a real estate agent you probably want to add a shop=real_estate tag as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Destate_agent  You can also add the name and contact details.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90832563
infeeeee (2020-09-14 23:07:20+00:00): Hey, you messed up Lake Balaton's relation in this changeset. I already fixed it, but be more careful with edits like this. It isn't nice when you accidentally remove the region's biggest lake. According to changeset logs, you got a warning when you submitted. Please pay attention to this warnings.
dmlu (2020-09-13 22:42:12+00:00): LPIS*
murble (2021-06-27 13:56:15+00:00): a recreation ground inside a danger area relation, seems slightly inappropriate(!), oh and you missed off fee=yes ;-)
DaveF (2021-06-27 14:40:34+00:00): 1. Which one are you referring to?
2. I wasn't mapping that tag.
murble (2021-06-27 15:35:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28687269/history as an example. but you seem to have changed loads of other shooting ranges to that in this changeset.
DaveF (2021-06-27 16:24:02+00:00): So, in that case it's not a leisure=pitch either. Did you contact User Hemmers as well?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89135482#map=15/51.3163/-0.6587
murble (2021-06-28 20:37:19+00:00): I don't think leisure=pitch was totally unreasonable in the way that recreation ground for an area where people are going to be discharging high energy projectiles clearly is.
  The edit by  User Hemmers doesn't seem unreasonable given it was fixing the use of military tags and pitch was already used for various other shooting areas in the uk, some of which you've changed in the same changeset! 

Are you saying you blindly changed every use of leisure=pitch without looking at what you were changing sorry if i have misunderstood?
klnkengi (2021-03-21 18:48:58+00:00): Hallo ChillyDLesby,
ist "Viereichen" als Locality-Name hier wirklich korrekt? Ich bin darüber gestolpert, weil dieser Name in der Radfahrkarte ziemlich groß gerendert wird und es dadurch dort so aussieht, als ob ganz "Albrechts Teerofen" "Viereichen" heißen würde.
ChillyDL (2021-03-21 21:19:16+00:00): Ja, das ist ein Phänomen bei diesem Renderer, das ist mir anderswo auch schon aufgefallen. Ich verschiebe den Node der Locality "Albrechts Teerofen" mal vom etwas exzentrischen Ort bei der alten Autbahnbrücke an den Ort in der Mitte der Siedlung, wo der Ofen tatsächlich stand. 
Der Name "Viereichen" ist mir von den alten dort Ansässigen geläufig. Hier sind zum Beispiel auch Luftbilder des Gewanns mit der Bezeichnung als Ansichtskarten zu finden: https://www.heimatsammlung.de/topo_unter/10/wannsee/wannsee.htm
oder 
http://www.grussauspotsdam.de/mysqlzugriff7.php?topo_unten=Albrechts%20Teerofen.
Die namensgebenden vier alten Eichen stehen dort heute noch.
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-14 03:03:57+00:00): Hi, on what basis is this bicycle=yes? Looks to me to only be wide enough for a person, and I haven't seen any signage to show that bicycles are allowed last time I visited.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Rob Roy (2020-09-21 06:13:25+00:00): I'd argue it was wide enough for a bicycle, but you are right - it's not a designated bicycle path. I'll remove the "bicycle=yes" and put it back to unknown.
aharvey (2020-09-14 02:11:48+00:00): I think there is enough uncertainty in Nearmap's terms of use https://www.nearmap.com/au/en/legal/terms-of-use compatibility with OpenStreetMap to say that Nearmap customers can't derive data from their imagery and upload that into OpenStreetMap. We need to be clear that any derived geospatial data from tracing or observations from the imagery have no restrictions on use that would be in conflict with OpenStreetMap's license. Until there is enough evidence that tracing Nearmap is okay in OSM then Nearmap shouldn't be used.
Владимир К (2021-11-24 14:03:38+00:00): а зачем вы удалили проезд и добавили снова, но неправильно?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-09-18 23:03:59+00:00): Heya Deven!

Welcome to OSM and thanks so much for your recent contributions.

I have made a few changes around the Kootenai Technical Education Campus and the North Idaho College Parker Technical Education Center:

- I fixed the typo in both names (you had an extra "i" on both).

- I set North Idaho College Parker Technical Education Center as a college rather than a school (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege)

- I disconnected the areas for the school and college from the adjacent parallel roads. It's really tempting to do join everything up, but it makes them a pain to edit later. Also, the landuse for the college/school is more accurately represented stopping at the curb/fenceline.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-09-14 10:41:48+00:00): Hi,
It seems that you added an unwanted change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11621028 as part of this changeset. Can you double-check that it was wanted?
Thanks!
ndm (2020-09-14 20:13:35+00:00): The changeset is too large to review.

Having said that I have removed the turn restriction that you added in Bristol -- it is not visible on Bing Streetside.
rkumreo (2020-09-15 07:16:02+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have accidentally created a large changeset. I have added the no left restriction at (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/200999896) based on the sign board (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9arZG3EssGU7KdMeaiQLqy&focus=photo&lat=51.49383957875554&lng=6.889023694243747&z=16.597809669394213&x=0.4924876241790348&y=0.6000911849602364&zoom=0), Please let me know in case it requires further more modifications. Thanks for your suggestions. I will be very careful while making the future edits. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
rkumreo
ndm (2020-09-15 19:52:44+00:00): The Mapillary image is nothing to do with the Bristol edit I reverted.
rkumreo (2020-09-17 11:10:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the response. I have made the Bristol edit based on the Mapillary street side (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=TJZ6qvf3m-77OvwEgRBmEA&focus=photo&lat=51.48095689253088&lng=-2.604912444951576&z=17), it will be helpful if the community can improvise our edits with the local knowledge. Please let me know in case of any more suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
rkumreo
MikeN (2020-09-14 01:45:40+00:00): Why do you keep deleting Lake Keowee?   If you don't recognize something, please don't delete it.
ndm (2020-09-14 19:33:19+00:00): Why do you/Amazon keep adding this ludicrous turn restriction -- it makes no sense.

I've already had to revert this change before.

The sign you think you are using is for the next road to the south.

Is there any way to add some note to Amazon logistics internal tasking to avoid this in the future?
rkumreo (2020-09-15 07:21:05+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thanks for checking into our edits and making necessary corrections. This is a honest mistake, I will make sure not to repeat these mistakes. I will double check before making the edits to avoid any possible misinterpretation. My sincere apologies. 

regards,
rkumreo
ndm (2020-09-15 19:54:22+00:00): In case you think I'm being grumpy -- this is almost exactly the same edit I told you about in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88701831
rkumreo (2020-09-17 10:35:10+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. My sincere apologies, That I have made the same mistake twice. You have already suggested the same edit before two months. I was confused with the sign board and created an unwanted turn restriction. I will take this as a learning from the community. Once again, apologies for my mistakes. I will make sure to never repeat this. Thank you.

Regards,
rkumreo
guillemmal (2020-09-14 04:08:28+00:00): Estimado/a MirVian, se aprecia el cambio realizado, pero la colocación del nombre de la escuela en el edificio resulta innesario ya que todos los datos de la escuela se encuentran en el área de la misma.
Dodko (2021-05-30 17:25:36+00:00): Naozaj tam existujú dlhé 52 metrové bytovky?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847015298
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847015299
Susedná bytovka má 32 metrov.
Dodko (2021-05-30 17:42:42+00:00): Treba si nastaviť pozadie, klávesová skratka B na Ortofotomozaika SR, to je novšia letecká fotka z roku 2019.
jonorossi (2020-09-15 03:41:35+00:00): Hi, great work with most of the changes, however you've extended Yasmin Court into private land, the cul de sac ends where it was before, just outside the purple roof house.
Tech Dec (2020-09-15 04:11:28+00:00): Thanks jon. I'll revert that change.
Tech Dec (2020-09-15 04:15:55+00:00): Corrected in changeset 90894777 here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90894777
jonorossi (2020-09-15 05:36:02+00:00): Thanks
Mashin (2020-09-21 04:25:45+00:00): All looks good.
Good job!
dgitto (2020-09-14 04:39:30+00:00): Ciao C'è davvero un rifugio qui (dove si può dormire)?
Poi il nome mi sembra strano
Marych_ (2020-09-15 12:41:16+00:00): Давно вас в Ташкенте не было!
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:36:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90837268
ZeLonewolf (2020-09-14 04:13:48+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2020-09-14 06:09:37+00:00): Oke.. maar op de kaart gaat dit nog steeds renderen als een verharde weg.
Maak van tracktype=grade1 (asphalt/beton)  even tracktype=grade2  Dat is gravel.

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 06:06:05+00:00): Beste fvoverveld..  Maar nu klopt er iets niet.
tracktype=grade1 houdt in beton of asfalt.. Dus paved.
surface=gravel tag je met tracktype=grade2
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
fvoverveld (2020-09-14 06:18:00+00:00): Dank voor de verduidelijking. Ik heb het aangepast. Nu goed hoop ik.
eggie (2020-09-14 06:33:49+00:00): Het klopt nu.. Je zult zien dat het straks  ook anders rendert
Gr eggie
phidauex (2020-09-14 20:13:06+00:00): Hi Jonathan - thanks for jumping into the mapping exercise, however you've made a few unintentional errors that need to be corrected.

First, I see you've made large square areas of grassland - the landuse tags are really only for areas carefully drawn to match the environment, rather than for a big grid square. Those should probably just be deleted.

I also noticed that you added a second creek on top of Elkhorn Creek. Since the creek was already mapped the additional linework isn't needed, so that can be deleted as well.

Let me know if you have any questions, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90840297
Dinamik (2020-09-14 18:29:12+00:00): Здравствуйте! Мне кажется, "Дагбашская" следовало заменять на "Дагбашская улица", а не на "улица Дагбашская". Или Вы знаете, что Дагбашскай - это фамилия человека, в честь которого названа улица (человек - Дагбашскай, улица - улица Дагбашская)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347279244
mvexel (2020-09-14 17:38:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! It looks like you were hoping to add a private apartment. The tag `tourism=apartment` is for AirBnB and similar vacation rentals. It would be sufficient to add the building the apartment is in, and add the `building=apartments` tag to it. Unless the individual apartment has a publicly known name, it shouldn't have a name in OSM.
If you have any questions please feel free to ask!
abakus_uploader (2020-09-14 22:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ametrin (2020-09-14 06:10:41+00:00): بورس انواع لوله ،اتصالات،شیرآلات بهداشتی،ساختمانی،صنعتیو کشاورزی... و انواع ابزار ساختمانی و صنعتی
user_5359 (2020-09-14 17:02:23+00:00): Hello! You upload a gpx track with any useful OSM information about the type of way. Please add this information or delete this way.
eggie (2020-09-14 06:25:29+00:00): Top!
RicoElectrico (2020-09-30 20:52:32+00:00): Hej, myślę że zamiast office=company będzie bardziej odpowiednie shop=agrarian agrarian=machine_parts.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dagrarian
jacek_zwik (2020-10-01 06:38:08+00:00): Nie ma specjalnie dobrego tagu na to. Firma sprzedaje maszyny rolnicze i serwisuje je. Odpowiednikiem byłby dealer samochodowy, ale nie ma czegoś takiego dla maszyn rolniczych, dla budowlanych również. Istnieją przecież są firmy trudniące się handlem i wypożyczaniem maszyn budowlanych. Dzięki, za podpowiedź, że jest i takie oznaczenie, bo mam kilka sklepów z częściami zamiennymi dla maszyn rolniczych, ale w nich nie kupisz np. kombajnu, a w tej firmie - możesz.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:27:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90844681
blackboxlogic (2020-10-09 02:45:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for adding these buildings. If you add more building where there are address nodes, feel free to move the address data to the new building and delete the old address node. Please ask if you have any questions. Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90845648
RicoElectrico (2020-09-14 10:46:43+00:00): Dzięki wielkie za aktualizację ;) Boczne ścieżki po prawie dekadzie się już zdezaktualizowały np. w okolicach jednostki wojskowej na Leszczynkach - wiele z nich zarosło. Wiele pracy jeszcze trzeba, żeby je zaktualizować.
RicoElectrico (2020-09-14 10:49:31+00:00): FYI, widziałem na Geoportalu (warstwa monitoring pozyskiwania danych -> dane pomiarowe), że będzie nowy lidar dla Gdyni i Sopotu, wcielenie do PGZiK w listopadzie - a kiedy wystawienie do WMTS, to nie wiem.
Marek-M (2020-09-14 11:02:26+00:00): Ta aktualizacja to efekt mojego wyjazdu rowerowego. Niestety tylko kilka dróg w Gdyni przejechałem i za dużo nie mogłem poprawić. Zresztą chyba taka ilość ścieżek leśnych jest nie do ogarnięcia :) Co nie znaczy, że przy kolejnej przejażdżce poprawię coś innego :)
eggie (2020-09-14 08:06:48+00:00): Dag gj Roelvink.. Het format voor je openingstijden klopt niet.

Gebruik anders deze tool en plak het reultaat in de waarde. 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Geef ook concreet aan wat je hebt veranderd.
Dat je was geef je aan met source=survey
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 08:08:50+00:00): Mooi dat je iets hebt gezien... oneway = no beter niet bijtaggen op reguliere wegen. dat is default.
Alleen als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat taggen vullen we dat in. Bv parallelfietspaden of een tweerichting fietsrotonde. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 08:10:38+00:00): Oke gj .. correct... dus kan je commentaar bij upload  zijn "note verwijderd". 
MVG,
Eggie
ZenPhil (2020-09-25 22:29:51+00:00): Deletions
RicoElectrico (2020-11-04 10:46:47+00:00): Cześć, wg uwagi droga jest otwarta:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2409632
Iga | Yanosik (2020-11-04 11:20:54+00:00): Zaktualizowane
abakus_uploader (2020-09-14 22:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
robbieonsea (2020-10-04 10:49:05+00:00): For this path you've put in a level crossing (but not on the railway) however Aerial Imagery, in particular Bing, suggests there is a foot bridge here. I don't remember whether there was a foot bridge since I was on the nearby road.
Can you confirm there is still a bridge here?
(And is the path a public footpath?)
As you are new to OSM, I can always improve this edit/area if you not confident on the best way to edit.
Gino Zabeo (2020-10-04 13:28:19+00:00): Hi,
Yes you are right. There is a footbridge over the railway. Please feel free to correct. I am indeed new to this and evidently selected the wrong category. 
Thank you for picking this up
Kind regards 
Gino
robbieonsea (2020-10-04 18:22:00+00:00): Thanks for the prompt response.
I've made the improvements - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91942503
Øukasz (2020-09-24 09:08:35+00:00): Hello, I would like to invite to help set up standard for mapping places in KRI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%C3%98ukasz/diary/394290
user_2066394 (2020-09-14 15:34:03+00:00): Biergarten ist jetzt ingesamt viermal erfasst. Als Fläche erfassen?
Meskalin (2020-09-15 15:15:21+00:00): Yep, ist jetzt eine schöne Fläche.
Vielen Dank!
Jan Olieslagers (2020-09-15 17:49:02+00:00): Would this be an active aerodrome today? In other words, is there currently any flying activity? If so, it would be nice to have some more information (operator?) If not, please tag accordingly (disused=yes or such)
osmviborg (2020-09-14 08:31:02+00:00): Hej. Hvis det er for at undgå at blive ledt via markvejen, så er det mere rigtigt at sætte begrænsninger på brugen af markvejen (privat). De to veje hænger jo faktisk sammen.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-10-06 10:30:00+00:00): Hallo azerim,

verwende für Beschreibungen bitte den Schlüssel "description" und nicht "name". Der Schlüssel name ist nur für "echte Namen" gedacht:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
user_2066394 (2020-09-14 15:42:08+00:00): Touristisch eher geringe Bedeutung, traffic_sign=* ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:traffic_sign
Meskalin (2020-09-15 15:10:23+00:00): Vielen Dank Wurzelast!
Fasse sonst praktisch überhaupt keine Verkehrszeichen an... ;)
Schöne Grüße!
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:56:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90851995
multimodaal (2020-10-04 17:08:05+00:00): Hoi, dank voor je bijdrage. Ik vroeg me af: wat is je bron?

Je hebt namelijk een algemene "access=no" gezet op dit pad (geheel gesloten voor het openbaar verkeer), terwijl deze eigen weg nog wel is opengesteld voor voetgangers, ook toen ik er afgelopen week nog was. 

Heb wel de indruk dat de gemarkeerde  paardenroute (en daarmee het  toegangsrecht voor ruiters) die hier eerder was verdwenen is, weet je of dat klopt?

Dank voor je reactie en met groet!
Kevin@RouteYou (2020-10-05 07:13:47+00:00): Beste, Bedankt voor jouw bericht. Ik kreeg deze opmerking door van de eigenaar van Landgoed Den Berg. Deze persoon wist ons te melden dat wandelingen op ons platform dit pad gebruiken, terwijl dit verboden is en was daar zeer expliciet in. Groeten. Kevin.
multimodaal (2020-10-05 19:03:17+00:00): Beste Kevin, dank voor je reactie. De mededeling van de eigenaar lijkt niet in overeenstemming met de feitelijke situatie qua verbodsborden in het veld (dat laatste is maatgevend voor OSM). 

Bij de westelijke ingang van dit pad van een bord dat wandelen toestaat en overige vormen van verkeer verbiedt:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tsdgsdS9t9oRpqWzeERBcZ

En recenter, andere ingang van het gebied
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bBnIptbBVb4z81FhmS7e0K 

De openstelling voor wandelaars is ook in lijn met de verstrekte beschikking voor subsidie Natuurbeheer SVNL, zoals ook te zien is op :
https://anlbviewer.portaalnatuurenlandschap.nl/anlb-flamingo-viewer/app/default?bookmark=12f447bc91f143c3a42f923ca698d3fe
 
Het staat Routeyou en OSM vrij om feitelijke informatie over deze geconstateerde openstelling  te delen. 
Groet (-: