piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_2066394 (2022-08-16 10:45:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124947244
OldManCelli (2021-11-12 21:19:43+00:00): This changeset seems to have broken the Harvard University relation. The removal of 947498343 has left the relation open. Would you mind reverting that change or fixing the Harvard University relation if you agree?
John_on_central (2021-11-13 15:03:09+00:00): ooooooo good note, let me see if I can sort things out
blackboxlogic (2021-11-10 00:02:02+00:00): Thanks for adding this street. I've updated the name to be Title Case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111258816
osmviborg (2021-09-16 07:06:05+00:00): Her splitter ikke en bygning, du sletter en bygning, og at tegner nye. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
osmviborg (2021-09-16 07:07:57+00:00): (Jøsses) Her splitter du ikke en bygning, du sletter en bygning, og tegner nye.
owiecc (2021-09-18 06:13:36+00:00): I know about keeping the history but I see no way to preserve that when I am converting one thing to multiple things. Any tips?
osmviborg (2021-09-18 07:08:42+00:00): Remodel the present building to be one of the new buildings.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-16 09:20:22+00:00): Olá, essa via por exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428337472/history
é uma via principal que dá acesso à residencias e fazendas, bem possível ser usada por carros e caminhões por isso não deve ser rebaixada para track.
Aplicativos de gps geralmente ignoram track para roteamento de veículos, então evite rebaixar todas as vias para track.
BNelly (2021-09-15 20:08:32+00:00): Realized I co-opted a Battle Creek relation that user SpeedMcCool was using for the section of Maplewood that goes by the same name, instead of creating my own as intended.  Sorry!  I have fixed this in changeset 111260619.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111259144
CjMalone (2021-09-16 07:54:57+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

Just a heads up, we can't use Royal Mail as a source for OSM. They wont allow it. We can however use Code-Point Open from Ordnance Survey as a source for postcodes.

Also in this edit the building tag was removed and an area tag added, I've swapped this back in #111277039.

If you have any questions, I'm happy to help.
englu (2022-06-14 15:51:35+00:00): Czy linia 680099949 oznaczona jako abandoned:highway=track nie istnieje w terenie? Nie ma tam nawet ścieżki, którą przejdzie pieszy? Na zdjęciach satelitarnych widać drogę, jest tam również żółty szlak pieszy. Może lepiej zamienić na highway=path + ewentualnie trail_visibility=bad?
magik1969 (2022-06-15 09:01:50+00:00): Z tego, co pamiętam z tej wycieczki, to nie ma śladu nawet po ścieżce. Przejść się da, ale na zasadzie "na przełaj". Nieużywane drogi polne zarastają b. szybko.
Na wszelki wypadek sprawdzę jeszcze przez weekend zapis z kamerki i dam znać.
englu (2022-06-15 10:18:45+00:00): Ok, dzięki. Przy okazji rzuć, proszę, okiem czy są tam jakiekolwiek oznaczenia żółtego szlaku.
magik1969 (2022-06-20 20:54:41+00:00): Linia 680099949 od strony Ruda Zagrody to pas zieleni wzdłuż płotu gęsto zarośnięty chwastami po tyłek. Nie byłem aż tak zdeterminowany żeby się tamtędy przedzierać, a do linii dostałem się z innej strony w okolicach punktu 6367926336. Tam aż do p. 6367926325 widać gdzieniegdzie pozostałości ścieżki/dróżki, teraz ewidentnie nie używanej. 
Przejechałem fragment żółtego szlaku od p. 718500217 do p. 3627529652.
Na tym odcinku nie zauważyłem żadnych żółtych znaków. Jedynym śladem po nim jaki widziałem, jest tablica informacyjna z mapką na skrzyżowaniu w Woli Dereźniańskiej.
Jako ciekawostkę dodam, że wzdłuż drogi 680099943, która też jest częścią żółtego szlaku widać wyraźne znaki szlaku, ale czarnego rowerowego.
Tak przynajmniej sytuacja wyglądała rok temu.
englu (2022-06-21 06:11:48+00:00): Dzięki za sprawdzenie. Ja bym co prawda tam dał highway=path + trail_visibility=bad/horrible ale to już kwestia interpretacji jak bardzo ta droga zarosła.
francians (2021-09-15 19:59:00+00:00): Ciao,

grazie per i contributi.
Al posto della nota, potresti integrare con questa chiave:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxlength

Francesco
DressyPear4 (2021-09-17 10:01:32+00:00): Olá, essa via por exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393292475
é uma via principal que dá acesso à residencias e fazendas, bem possível ser usada por carros e caminhões por isso não deve ser rebaixada para track.
Aplicativos de gps geralmente ignoram track para roteamento de veículos, então evite rebaixar todas as vias para track.
SekeRob (2022-04-14 17:46:36+00:00): Hi,

Ben met schoonmaak bezig geweest van de inner en outer roles in het LOFAR wetland gebied en daar waar in werkelijkheid er geen 360 graden omlijsting van wetland is naar outer te wijzigen zodat ook geen wetland meer in de Achterste Diep rendered. De vraag is: Die LOFAR zones staat wit op de kaart terwijl er grass groeit. Zou op zijn minst landcover=grass toevoegen voor de data consumers maar denk dat het eerder landuse=grass of meadow zou moeten zijn.

Wat denk je? (Niet naar voorbeelden elders gekeken!)

PS Als je in dit geval water area tegen water area ligt kan er geen wetland ook nog eens als inner role tussen liggen, dan krijg je duplicate segments en rare render problemen. IIG het ziet er nu goed uit, bliift alleen die vraag nog van de landcover op die LOFAR zones.

ciao
Anton Khorev (2021-09-28 13:11:29+00:00): Hello.

Can you please take a look at this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Other users have already asked you to write proper changeset comments:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109835919  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110042510

Unfortunately, yours still consist of a single character.

(automatyczne tłumaczenie)

Dzień dobry.

Czy możesz zajrzeć na tę stronę wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Inni użytkownicy już poprosili Cię o napisanie odpowiednich komentarzy do zestawu zmian:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109835919  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110042510

Niestety, twój wciąż składa się z jednego znaku.

Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
trigpoint (2021-09-16 10:58:52+00:00): Hi
There is a facebook tag for facebook pages, they should not be tagged as a website.
This pub also has a proper website however which should be tagged using the website tag and is obviously preferred over facebook.

Cheers Phil
mini-me (2021-09-15 20:16:01+00:00): Откат пакетов правок 111251423, 111251103, 111250835, 111249538, 111249182, 111248161, 111248026, 111247265, 111247075, 111244621, 111244428, 111242761, 111242670, 111242634, 111240712, 111239868, 111099032, 111098879
SomeoneElse (2021-09-16 14:15:49+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9095261300 in someone's back garden in Cambridge.  The only location visible on https://www.timberworks-cambridge.co.uk/contact/ is from a Google Map, which obviously isn't compatible with OSM's licence, To be fair you haven't added the POI exactly where the Google map had it, but both locations are implausible.
What I suggest that you do is contact local mappers (perhaps via an OSM note if you don't want to do the hard yards yourself) asking them whether this really is an office in the normal sense of the word, or is just a "work from home business" which wouldn't normally be mappable in OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy
Roman Oleynik (2021-09-16 16:24:20+00:00): Hello,
I will delete the point and try to find more convincing sources.
Thank you! 
Best regards,
Roman
SomeoneElse (2021-09-16 16:37:35+00:00): Thanks!
kartonage (2021-09-17 07:29:29+00:00): Hej und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,

hier ist ein klein wenig schief gefangen. Die Straßen sind querd durch die Stadt gezogen worden und mit anderen Objekten verknüpft worden. (sichtbar über: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111262572&zoom=15&lat=48.3854&lon=9.2935)

Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher was du genau vorhattest, aber ich musste den ursprünglichen Stand wiederherstellen.

Beste Grüße
Pt873 (2021-09-16 21:55:30+00:00): Olá, é possível desfazer a alteração no cruzamento entre a Avenida São Sebastião e a Rua do Fio? Há uma mini-rotatória devidamente sinalizada no local.
Pegasus21 (2021-09-17 13:46:53+00:00): No problem! Thanks for that information. I will get it changed.
Pt873 (2021-09-17 16:42:14+00:00): Obrigado!
Mike Baggaley (2021-11-18 00:31:48+00:00): Hi, I think it would be better if the parts of the roundabout were not tagged as a roundabout until the roundabout is complete.

Cheers,
Mike
brianboru (2021-11-18 20:28:28+00:00): Hi Mike - my edit didn't touch that tag - better to take it up with the actual editor. I'm actually indifferent about the issue

Regards

Brian
iandees (2021-09-16 00:35:13+00:00): Hello! Thanks for adding names to roads. Note that because it's easier for a computer to shorten a name than it is to expand a name, we store the full name in OSM instead of the shortened. In other words, please use "Circle" instead of "Cir" and "Parkway" instead of "Pkwy".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111263451
Fenella1234 (2021-09-16 00:49:20+00:00): Good to know, thank you!!
ivanbranco (2021-09-17 16:13:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5930306718/history

What's the meaning of "Esborrada informació duplicada=board"?

Also please write useful changeset comments, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
paunofu (2021-09-18 00:52:46+00:00): I'm new using JOSM, and i don't know how i wrote the changeset in the node, but this morning i have seen the error and delete it. I will see the wiki "good changeset comments", thank you. Anyway, Esborrada informació duplicada means deleted duplicate information in catalan.
marczoutendijk (2021-09-17 12:36:06+00:00): Please reread the message we sent you before:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4003
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Shaun das Schaf (2021-09-16 07:50:23+00:00): Hallo Michael, willkommen bei OSM!

Was ist denn "Fahrschulen Emser" bitte für eine Hausnummer?

Bitte trage die Fahrschule als "amenity=driving_school" und "name=Fahrschulen Emser" ein.

Wenn du die echte Hausnummer weißt, kannst du diese natürlich in "addr:housenumber" eintragen, ansonsten diesen Tag bitte wieder entfernen.

Das "description=Führerschein" bitte auch entfernen, das bringt keinen Mehrwert.

Wenn du Fragen hast oder Hilfe benötigst, kannst du dich gerne melden.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:22:43+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9095706821/history
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-21 06:06:36+00:00): What is the source for the unceded territory?
michael60101 (2023-03-25 06:13:51+00:00): This relation is inappropriately tagged and most likely is not necessary to map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110822502, 110822518, 110822531, 110822566, 110822603, 110844562, 110844700, 110844784, 110844839, 110845226, 110845293, 110847258, 110847398, 110870250, 110870543, 110872844, 110872887, 110873141, 110873351, 110874399, 110875306, 110875500, 110875590, 110880010, 110880196, 110880334, 110880554, 110880721, 110880741, 110881000, 110881115, 110881189, 110881255, 110881290, 110881415, 110881454, 110881625, 110881670, 110881775, 110881811, 110881853, 110881883, 110881996, 110882042, 110882141, 110882176, 110882197, 110882247, 110882299, 110882310, 110905838, 110905919, 110907501, 110910392, 110910968, 110911168, 110912006, 110912325, 110912398, 110912747, 110912846, 110913276, 110913459, 110913813, 110913858, 110914183, 110914964, 110935389, 110935471, 110936941, 110937038, 110939260, 110939703, 110939891, 110940008, 110940179, 110940349, 110940846, 110940998, 110941135, 110941217, 110941291, 110941567, 110941817, 110941870, 110969240, 110969362, 110969515, 110969668, 110969762, 110969928, 110971120, 110971196, 110971559, 110971622, 110975001, 110975553, 110975677, 110975801, 110975851, 110976180, 110976402, 110976429, 110986715, 110986782, 110987059, 110987171, 110987545, 110987832, 110988235, 110988414, 110988625, 110988897, 110996149, 110996220, 110996668, 110996753, 110996784, 110996946, 110997020, 110997232, 110997311, 110997603, 110997666, 110997706, 110998060, 110998223, 110998275, 110998333, 110998581, 110998660, 110998686, 110998735, 110998759, 110998863, 110998936, 110998982, 110999210, 111017905, 111018267, 111020329, 111020969, 111021950, 111021991, 111022278, 111022390, 111023319, 111025920, 111026042, 111026256, 111026812, 111027040, 111027108, 111027194, 111027791, 111028108, 111028450, 111028894, 111029167, 111030110, 111035363, 111035784, 111035976, 111036183, 111040364, 111040734, 111040911, 111041444, 111041528, 111041762, 111042069, 111042162, 111042407, 111042574, 111042708, 111042746, 111042838, 111043085, 111043242, 111043319, 111043531, 111043707, 111043724, 111043782, 111043977, 111044017, 111044076, 111044324, 111044512, 111044535, 111044738, 111044860, 111045550, 111045670, 111045759, 111045873, 111045931, 111045949, 111046069, 111046217, 111046312, 111046368, 111046441, 111046475, 111046493, 111046545, 111046586, 111046648, 111046716, 111046735, 111046784, 111046791, 111046814, 111046836, 111046852, 111046877, 111046897, 111046934, 111046976, 111046988, 111047005, 111047072, 111047104, 111047111, 111047166, 111057058, 111057108, 111057885, 111058196, 111058476, 111058699, 111060154, 111060324, 111060779, 111060986, 111061414, 111061437, 111061830, 111062024, 111062238, 111062386, 111062441, 111062702, 111062934, 111063134, 111063329, 111063490, 111063918, 111064444, 111064525, 111065183, 111067614, 111067810, 111068024, 111068201, 111068364, 111068537, 111068614, 111213562, 111213596, 111213841, 111213863, 111214088.
Glassman (2021-09-16 18:27:29+00:00): You could also have used building=apartment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111265087
pio2_122 (2021-09-16 10:25:26+00:00): Adres pojawił się na e-mapie.

Swoją drogą, ten budynek na ortofoto wygląda mi na ruinę (tylko część budynku ma dach), a według obrysu z EGiB jest to „inny budynek niemieszkalny”.
Ale jeśli został dodany do gminnej ewidencji to chyba wszystko jest OK...
Zaraz usunę fixme.
NieWnen (2021-09-16 10:43:42+00:00): Możesz się wstrzymać na razie z fixme. 
Tak jak fixme mówi, dodałem je zgłaszając na e-mapie i właśnie widzę, że dostałem z 15 maili o realizacji :D, wiec jeszcze dzisiaj wszystkie przejrzę ponownie :P
pio2_122 (2021-09-16 11:06:37+00:00): Nie będzie takiej potrzeby :D
W międzyczasie już to zrobiłem :P
NieWnen (2021-09-16 13:15:02+00:00): Zdjąłem pozostałe tj. z gminy Brochów i Leoncin. Część nadal niewidoczna w gminie Leoncin. W mailu odpisali, że w ciągu kilku następnych dni zrealizują, więc jak się nie pojawi, można pewnie będzie je usunąć.
pio2_122 (2021-09-16 10:18:13+00:00): Adres pojawił się na e-mapie.
Zaraz usunę fixme :)
Eifelkobold! (2022-06-24 22:37:02+00:00): Hallo WoodB,

mir ist erneut aufgefallen, dass du in diesem Änderungssatz die lokalen, kölschen Namen von mehreren Objekten entfernt hast. Was ist der Grund dafür?

Mir ist zudem aufgefallen, dass deine Changeset-Kommentare nicht besonders aussagekräftig und oft gleich sind. Es wäre wünschenswert, wenn diese etwas spezifischer wären. Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Eifelkobold! (2022-07-03 17:25:44+00:00): Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz in Änderungssatz 123159202 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123159202) vollständig zurückgesetzt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-16 01:48:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110519699, 110520369, 110521143, 110521587, 110522959, 110823768, 110933548, 110933635, 110934042, 110934447, 110935022, 111213239, 111213312, 111213546, 111214019, 111214736, 111214944, 111217267, 111217617, 111217918, 111218474, 111218499, 111218626, 111218666, 111218908, 111218990, 111219012, 111219031, 111219065, 111219135, 111219369, 111219694, 111219717.
Supaplex (2021-09-16 05:58:34+00:00): 你好：

你是不是不小心將東勢文化園區更改屬性，改為住宅區?
由於 OpenStreetMap 是公共的地理資料庫，多家業者如 Facebook、Amazon、Niantic 都有在用，如果加了錯誤資料將會影響很多人!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111266344
Supaplex (2021-09-16 06:29:51+00:00): 您好：

你是不是不小將仁美里的類別從行政區改成地點了?
這個里應該還存在吧?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111266412
DressyPear4 (2021-09-16 09:46:29+00:00): Olá, verifique melhor na wiki as tags dos elementos que você está adicionando, em toda edição há erros, "landuse=park" por exemplo, não é correto.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111266416
Glassman (2021-09-16 18:30:51+00:00): #TIP: When removing a business, its a good idea to retain the address since it will likely be reused at some point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111266515
ovruni (2021-09-16 04:41:19+00:00): Hola en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado la vía de servicio y ha indicado "d", otro de sus conjuntos de cambios dice "levantamiento", lo cual no brinda suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
DressyPear4 (2021-09-16 09:10:24+00:00): Olá, não faça edições fictíceas.
Edição removida.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111267319
booktiger (2021-09-17 07:01:43+00:00): 编辑者您好：
感谢您对Openstreetmap所做的贡献。现邀请您加入中国编辑者的QQ群，与其他的编辑者一起交流，完善中国的OSM。
全国QQ大群：290278518
北京地区编辑者QQ群：934831605
如果您是來自其他國家/地區，不常使用QQ的中文使用者，請加入https://t.me/osmchina
感谢您对地图的贡献，期待您的加入！
Minh Nguyen (2022-05-12 18:25:37+00:00): Hi, I retagged node 6778205752 as office=political_campaign to distinguish the campaign headquarters from a party field office. Since Bhalla ran unopposed in 2021, do you know if the campaign headquarters is still open?
MapSpot (2022-05-12 18:49:56+00:00): I'll confirm when I go to Hoboken next week. It's likely a vacant storefront currently.
Frans S (2021-09-20 13:41:23+00:00): How to map tall buildings

Hi. Are you aware how tall buildings have to be mapped and positioned on their footprints? In the centre of some cities are rather tall buildings which are bad mapped and not shifted to their footprint.  I’ve consulted Russel Deffner about this issues. He asked to pay attention to that so validators are  going to correct these mappings or invalidate those tasks where there are wrong mapped and ask you mappers to redraw them according to the method shown in the video (see link ) I will refer to a Youtube video of Bigardot where he explains how to map these.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs

This video is made for JOSM, but in ID editor you can use it as well. Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111269472
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-09-16 13:27:55+00:00): voce colocou essa estrada como mao unica, impossível, como vao voltar depois de chegar ao final? por favor, corrija as informações da via.
Pedro_Kififjfd (2021-09-16 16:30:54+00:00): Agradeço o aviso. O sentido de tráfego foi corrigido
wireguy (2021-09-22 16:59:00+00:00): Moving buildings is correct, but you have to make sure the imagery is correctly aligned first.  see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery

in your area it looks like mapbox imagery is better and better aligned than bing (but imagery gets better over time).   So, you have additional work to do.  Check road intersections and make sure the imagery is correctly aligned there first before adjusting the buildings.  Have fun!
Mike Coles (2021-09-22 18:16:13+00:00): Many thanks, wireguy. So much to learn. So easy to mess up. I'll get on the ground and verify what is accurate, starting with the roads. Thanks, again.
Truchin (2021-09-27 11:09:54+00:00): Bonjour Nihombashi

C'est bizarre d'avoir transformé la rue résidentielle en sentier/voie piéton vélo. D'après les panneaux, c'est une rue piétonne.
Je corrige.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
nihombashi19 (2021-09-27 18:19:20+00:00): Oui, c'est ça. Rue piétonne sans aucun trafic motorisé. Désolé du ratage !
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-16 05:33:58+00:00): Edycja byłą przejrzana, nie ma nawet utraty danych bo network~MPK Kraków jest odpowiednikiem tutaj
muralito (2021-09-18 22:56:31+00:00): Hi.  I disagree with this changeset. This kind of shop does not sell delicatessen.
muralito (2021-09-18 22:56:41+00:00): Hi.  I disagree with this changeset. This kind of shop does not sell delicatessen.
muralito (2021-09-18 22:57:03+00:00): Hi.  I disagree with this changeset. This kind of shop does not sell delicatessen.
uwuowo69bakagirl (2021-09-23 06:11:22+00:00): cudowne!!!!!@!!
profesorpiasek (2021-09-16 06:30:26+00:00): ta nazwa nie jest wlaściwa Oskarzer
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-04 09:53:59+00:00): Опитах се да оправя кръстовището при https://www.osm.org/node/9096776004, но не виждам откъде минава велоалеята, която е от страната на бензиностанцията.
ivanatora (2022-03-04 12:15:09+00:00): Ох, то това кръстовище и бул. Източен като цяло са за преправяне... По Източен велоалеите са тагнати веднъж върху булеварда с cycleway:right и втори път самостоятелно с highway=cycleway...
Това е горе-долу схемата на велалеите там: https://imgur.com/s3bhcwf
Все се каня да събера сили да го оправя и все нещо ми се отщява :)
Dimitar155 (2022-03-04 14:58:29+00:00): Мисля че вече е добре. Махнах таговете за велоалея от булеварда и раздалечих двете платна, понеже бяха доста близо.
бул. Христо Ботев има ли някаква разделителна ивица? Гледам че от бул. Санкт Петербург до бул. Найчо Цанов има само двойна линия, а северното платно съвпада почти на 100% със северния тротоар.
ivanatora (2022-03-04 16:39:59+00:00): Супер. 
Христо Ботев в този участък е само двойна линия. От автогара Юг на запад има мантинела.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-04 17:54:50+00:00): Бул. Христо Ботев е готов. Добавих и тротоарите, за да не е съвсем празно около него.