piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2016-02-23 10:04:07+00:00): официальная документация для OSM здесь роли не играет. Статусы присваиваются исходя из фактической, а не бумажной значимости в сети дорог. Вот, почитайте (но, естественно, это все для дорог, по которым ЗАПУЩЕНО движение, а здесь этого еще не произошло): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Tyran (2016-01-31 00:59:18+00:00): Moin!
Beim Anbau wurde das Tag building=yes vergeben. Warum bitte? Bin neu hier und möchte lernen.
Danke.
schmarn (2016-01-31 09:32:58+00:00): Hallo Tyran,
ich habe building=yes hinzugefügt, weil die Fläche vorher überhaupt nicht als Gebäude getagt war. "building=yes" ist die Lösung für faule Leute, wenn es mal schnell gehen muss und man kein präziseres Tag raussuchen möchte. Das was du machst ist sicherlich besser: Eine Garage als "garage" zu mappen und ein einfaches Einfamilienhaus als "house". Bei manchen Renderern wird das dann auch unterschiedlich dargestellt. Von daher Daumen hoch!

Ich hatte vor einigen Monaten die paar Point of Interesset an der Luttener Großen Straße sowie die dazugehörigen Gebäude eingetragen, deshalb gucke ich ab und zu noch mal drüber. Da war mir aufgefallen, dass du das Gebäude Tag vergessen hast.

Falls du Hilfe bei irgendetwas brauchst oder weitere Fragen hast, stehe ich dir zur Verfügung.

Grüße
André
schmarn (2016-01-31 09:37:07+00:00): Falls du die Seite noch nicht kennst:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

Dort findest du nahezu alle Mapping Situationen aufgelistet.
Tyran (2016-01-31 15:14:30+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
Ich hatte den Anbau als
"building:part=house" getaggt.
Reicht das nicht für die Render?
Garage und Häuser sind auch nicht als "building=yes" getaggt.
schmarn (2016-01-31 19:17:43+00:00): Man soll ja eigentlich nicht für den Renderer mappen, von daher sollte uns das nicht interessieren ob es dargestellt wird oder nicht. Viel wichtiger ist, dass es einigermaßen konventionell und logisch ist. 

Ich kenne das building:part Tag nur im Zusammenhang mit 3D mapping, wenn man einzelne Gebäudeteile unterschiedlich darstellen möchte als das Gesammtgebäude. 
Beispielsweise für sowas: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.0762415&lon=8.8086461&zoom=19&camera.theta=52.735&camera.phi=-77.063

Ich würde den Anbau nur als building=house oder garage mappen.
maraf24 (2016-01-29 22:10:19+00:00): Naciśnięcie S po narysowaniu budynku wyprostuje w nim kąty.
Katarzyna Jakubiszyn (2016-02-17 17:22:25+00:00): Dziękuję za podpowiedz.
nyuriks (2017-11-20 23:27:11+00:00): Hi, the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255467667 wikipedia article is about the subject of the statue, not the statue itself. I will change it, but please let me know if you think it should be kept.
rodrigoignaciobr (2016-01-30 00:26:23+00:00): Pelo que entendi a rua Alameda Rio Branco a partir da rua Rua Pastor Stutzer vai ser mão única com três pistas em direção a Rua 7 de Setembro e cruzando a rua 7 mão única a Rua VX.
adrianojbr (2016-01-30 00:27:37+00:00): é por aí mesmo. estou editando ainda. quando terminar, te aviso para que você possa revisar. ok?
adrianojbr (2016-01-30 01:29:53+00:00): rodrigo, terminei as alterações (sentido, classificação, semáforos, faixas de pedestre, estacionamento, calçadas, ciclofaixas...). confere lá, por favor.

para facilitar, veja as alterações feitas em: 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36889564

e 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36891390
adrianojbr (2016-01-30 02:12:34+00:00): mais alterações: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36891754

para ver as alterações nas relações (rotas de ônibus, ciclofaixas, etc.) marque "relations" e clique em "load" para recarregar a verificação.
rodrigoignaciobr (2016-01-30 19:53:11+00:00): Ficou muito bom.
GerdP (2016-01-30 09:08:51+00:00): Hi there!
Please check:
What was meant with highway=11 + step_count=7 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394736057
gebux (2016-01-30 14:34:48+00:00): Was meant to be highway=steps & steps_count=11. Fixed it.
Superadlen (2016-02-27 18:04:48+00:00): les adresses svp
adrianojbr (2016-01-31 19:11:15+00:00): olá, rodrigo, passei ontem em algumas dessas ruas que você editou e estão perfeitas. todas as instruções corretas no osmand. inclusive, tirei algumas fotos com o mapillary que já estão disponível como camada nos editores no osm. sabe usar o mapillary?
rodrigoignaciobr (2016-01-31 19:39:20+00:00): Brusque tem muita coisa pra fazer, falta muitas ruas, usei o mapillary uma vez pra fazer um teste na rua Divinópolis até a José Reuter.
Wolle DD (2016-01-30 17:11:12+00:00): Warum meinst Du, dass die Kreuzungen der Schienen nicht als nodes getaggt werden sollen und löschst diese? Was soll daran veraltet sein? Diese Schienen kreuzen sich an den Stellen. Und somit sind diese auch miteinander verbunden.
Wolle DD (2016-02-08 08:59:39+00:00): Keine Antwort, keine Begründung -> Changeset revertet.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 22:56:59+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3419352 ?
Polarbear (2016-02-13 00:41:18+00:00): Hi, it would be recommended to use the BrE spelling community_centre for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394764981. You might also add the type of the centre, and a potential target group, if applicable, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-03 22:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36987797.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-03 22:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36987797.
jc86035 (2016-02-01 04:33:15+00:00): Why did you delete these?
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-03 22:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36987797.
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-30 11:25:08+00:00): Ah neat. If you are keen, there's a few others via http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/South_Australian_Roads that we know of - there's a generated .osm file with the details
MKnight (2016-02-07 18:14:49+00:00): was muss man sich unter e_sport vorstellen?
Rogehm (2016-02-08 13:48:31+00:00): Sowas ist gemeint:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Sport.
Noch nicht anerkannt für die olympischen Spiele...
Supaplex (2016-02-07 12:32:02+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Warin61 (2016-07-10 00:29:45+00:00): Hi,
The Broadway Post Office Node: 3977545159 ... from the LPI base map is across the road - same building .. I have added it. One of the two needs to be deleted ... leave it to you?
alesarrett (2021-04-23 03:27:01+00:00): Riguardo alla via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303866427 ho modificato la tipologia da living_street in residential, perché living street ha un significato preciso e avrebbe bisogno di cartelli specifici. La strada mi pare sia con accesso ai veicoli solo per frontisti, quindi da access no ho messo accesso privato ai veicoli a motore. Ti sembra vada bene?
Freiheit28 (2021-04-23 08:04:09+00:00): Ciao,
si si certo va più che bene. Su quella stradina è stato istituito nel 2016 un divieto di transito, con esclusione dei frontisti.
Grazie, a presto
Hjart (2016-01-30 12:06:50+00:00): Nu har jeg igen måttet bruge tid på at rydde op efter dig og jeg må lige gentage: Undlad venligst at klippe veje op i meget små stykker.
Steve_32 (2016-01-31 11:13:55+00:00): Мне кажется, footway=crossing на пешеходном мосту не совсем уместно. Crossing всё-таки предназначен для обозначения пересечений на одном уровне...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
Ryba (2016-01-31 20:37:51+00:00): Я не против. свойства мосту я не давал. Они до меня уже были. Удалил )))
Steve_32 (2016-02-01 15:35:14+00:00): Ну правка ваша была: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=36895326#map=16&relations=true
Хотя это мог josm с пресетами начудить.
Ерунда, ничего страшного ;)
PlaneMad (2016-02-02 05:55:18+00:00): Sabeeh, this is amazing data. Can you please share a link to the source of the data?
dvdhoven (2016-01-30 17:13:29+00:00): De Woeziksestraat is geen eenrichting!!!!!!
Er staat een inrijverbod voor motorvehicles (C12) ongeveer bij nummer 617 en dat betreft het kleine schuine stukje tussen Mussenbergseweg en Woeziksestraat.
Bovendien geldt die eenrichting ook nog eens alleen voor motorvoertuigen minus brommers. Dus je had tenminste oneway:bicycle=no en oneway:moped=no erbij moeten zetten.
Nu heb je weer het fietsknooppuntennetwerk aan gort geholpen.
Maar omdat ik niet aan de gang wil blijven, zet ik die fiets en brommer uitzonderingering er wel bij.
Dan is het fietsknooppuntennetwerk tenminste weer in orde.
Al ben ik het absoluut niet met die eenrichting eens,
Tegen eigenwijze draken kun je niet vechten.
Martin Borsje (2016-02-02 14:14:55+00:00): Beste Jaap,

Bij elke edit die je tot nu toe gedaan hebt geef je als comment 'verandering'.
In hoeverre denk je dat een dergelijk comment nuttig is? (een comment als 'geen verandering' zou overigens nog minder waarde hebben...;-). 
Zou een comment als "bicycle path added" niet iets meer informatie geven?
jaap de vries (2016-02-02 15:03:59+00:00): je veranderd toch iets, het fietspad lag er al, maar de verkeerslichten niet. dus een verandering
Martin Borsje (2016-02-02 21:59:28+00:00): Hoi Jaap,

Misschien praten we langs elkaar heen...
Elke edit in OSM is een verandering, anders is het geen edit.
Als jij als commentaar van elke edit slechts het woord 'verandering' gebruikt, dan lijkt mij dat voor de andere OSM-editors geen informatie op te leveren; toch? Het doel van het geven van commentaar bij een edit is andere mappers te informeren wat je gedaan hebt. En nogmaals: mijn reactie was niet specifiek op deze edit geënt maar, zoals ik al zei, op al jouw edits.
Ik hoop dat het nu duidelijk is, zo niet, laat het dan weten.
Hoi
Martin
BeKri (2016-01-30 15:09:22+00:00): Aufgemerkt ;-))
durch Deine Anpassung der Gebäudeumrisse bei Dornach ist Dir am node 286452830 der way 140177036 (Grenze der Aerowestbilder) mitneigrutscht.
Sieht man dann bei http://tyrasd.github.io/latest-changes/#16/48.1484/11.6837 recht rot ;-)). Ned wirklich schlimm, mehr als Hinweis auf diese wichtige "Grenze"
Gruss und happy tagging
derBeKri
sabas88 (2016-01-30 14:25:59+00:00): Yeeees!
EneaSuper (2016-01-30 14:30:32+00:00): Ci ho lavorato molto, ma sto avendo dei problemi con delle relazioni (il Conservatorio e la piazza Nazzari) e sto tentando di risolverli xD
R0bst3r (2016-01-31 21:43:47+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis: Razed wird eigentlich nur bei railway tags verwendet. Für alles andere gibt es die wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix.
bxl-forever (2018-07-12 12:51:25+00:00): Hello,
I have reverted maxspeed=30 for those 3 streets, I suppose you no longer need the modified values for that test, right?
naoliv (2016-02-02 17:57:59+00:00): Carlos, por favor, não apague as áreas. Apenas as corrija.
Note que os 3 lugares que você apagou possuíam um aviso justamente pedindo isso: "Ajustar contorno à área onde predominam moradias vizinhas."
5m4u9 (2016-01-31 10:09:50+00:00): Gracias por añadir más info al mapa.

Esta bueno ir corrigiendo el tipo de vía de la zona.
GinaroZ (2016-09-21 18:55:24+00:00): Hi, just to let you know I've corrected the tagging of "vape" shops you added, to shop=e-cigarette.
Falsernet (2021-12-17 02:47:04+00:00): Should this road have access=permissive? It seems to have security and everything
looniverse (2017-03-28 19:01:22+00:00): Hi ma-rt-in, 

meines Erachtens werden an den Relationen mit Admin-Level 9 keine amtlichen Gemeindeschlüssel hinterlegt; zumindest hab ich in Deutschland nur vier gefunden :-)
Was meinst Du: kann man den Schlüssel entfernen?

Viele Grüße

Thomas
ma-rt-in (2017-03-28 19:30:22+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

Lass den dran, da die Ortsteile tatsächlich einen Schlüssel besitzen.

Gruß Martin
looniverse (2017-03-29 10:09:54+00:00): Hi Martin,
OK...
Viele Grüße und weiter schönes Mapping
Thomas
escada (2016-11-07 12:10:37+00:00): Beste,

ik ben onlangs op deze plaats geweest. Het Kortewegel pad is daar nergens te zien.
Ook op de luchtfoto's zie ik daar geen spoor van. Bent u zeker dat dit pad op de juiste plek is getekend ?
wegspotter (2016-11-07 12:21:03+00:00): Hallo,
bij de tags staat trail_visibilty op "no". De weg is echter niet versperd: de doorgang is mogelijk. Ik volgde de richtlijnen op: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Slowroads#Deciding_what_to_map. Het pad valt duidelijk onder: "invisible and year-round accessible: in OSM, in accordance to the English and Welsh system of "public rights of way" - UK access provisions#Public Rights of Way". Dus kwam het pad erop.
d1g (2016-01-30 14:59:45+00:00): Исправил название потом ещё https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36899418
d1g (2016-01-30 15:51:33+00:00): продолжил в http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36899916
BeKri (2016-02-03 17:11:11+00:00): Hallo, kurzer Hinweis
Optiker in der
Wassernurger Landstraße ?

Gruss derBeKri
whellmut (2016-02-03 18:38:35+00:00): Das kommt davon, wenn man mit den dicken Fingern auf dem Tablet tippt. Vielen Dank für den Tipp. Schon korrigiert.
d1g (2016-01-30 15:41:18+00:00): Ещё раз исправил в http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36899916
d1g (2016-01-30 15:42:29+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36899418 и http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36899152
Haris IRM-ED (2021-06-28 02:36:41+00:00): Olá UsuárioPar

Parece que agora a maior parte da água da lagoa já está seca, acho que a geometria do polígono precisa ser atualizada desde a última atualização há 5 anos.
Obrigado.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/394923118
Hjart (2016-02-06 16:43:36+00:00): Bemærk at Geodatastyrelsens fotos fra foråret 2015 er mere friske end Bings, som er standard. Du kan vælge dem under "baggrundsindstillinger".
Finn Årup Nielsen (2016-02-07 18:59:50+00:00): Tak for oplysningen. Jeg har opdateret kortet så det er mere i overensstemmelse med virkeligheden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-04-11 04:44:54+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/545023
ToniE (2016-01-30 18:58:15+00:00): Hallo Angelika,

willkommen bei OSM. Könntest Du bitte, wenn Du die Adressinformation an den Hauseingang mappst, die evtl. schon vorhandenen Informationen des Hauses löschen. Wir bekommen sonst doppelte Adressen in der Datenbank und das wird von Qualitätsicherungswerkzeugen als Fehler gemeldet, was wiederum andere Mapper veranlasst aufzuräumen - und dabei eventuell Deine Infos wieder löscht (weil er Adressen am Haus bevorzugt). Beide Arten die Adressen zu mappen sind gleichwertig erlaubt, es sollte am Haus aber nur eine davon benutzt werden.
Danke und Gruß,
Toni
MKnight (2018-12-21 18:27:33+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier zwischen der ziegenhainer 107 und der 109a eine "9" eingetragen. 
Klingt so, als ob Du die fehlende "109" gemeint haben könntest?
Stalfur (2016-01-31 00:59:13+00:00): Er brú yfir Úlfarsá á þessari nýju leið
Baldvin (2016-01-31 18:21:07+00:00): Já. Ég á eftir að fara betur í þetta þegar snjóa leysir aðeins. Það er líka skilið á milli akstursstefna þarna á hluta af leiðinni ofl. sem ég á eftir að skrá betur.
Stereo (2016-01-31 11:08:01+00:00): Ça sera cool quand on aura les noms de toutes les villas du cap :)
malenki (2016-01-30 18:38:19+00:00): Btw: keine Ahnung, weshalb das Reverter-Plugin in diesem Changeset gelistet ist; hatte es in einem anderen Layer der JOSM-Instanz verwendet.
Pontiac_CZ (2018-12-10 14:13:21+00:00): Ahoj, k cestě https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385023385/history jsi přidal name = "Oskol". Není to omyl? Oskol je na druhé straně Kroměříže.
Minimalis (2018-12-10 14:54:41+00:00): Ahoj, 
díky za upozornění - název je převzatý z RUIAN. http://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/ulice/239917 . Tam si klikni na mapu.
Jestli je to chyba, nebo záměr nevím, každopádně i na mapě jsou ulice s názvem Oskol na dvou místech. 
Ulice jsou i jako TMS vrstva od Petra V. - https://tile.poloha.net/ulice/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
Asi by bylo dobré na tuto skutečnost upozornit obec, ale osobně s tím nemám dobré zkušenosti - většinou je to bez reakce.
Můžu to revertnout, nebo jednoduše ten název odstraň. 
M.D.
Pontiac_CZ (2018-12-10 19:38:43+00:00): Vidím, že jsi byl rychlejší. :-) Jinak nejsem Kroměřížák, takže ani žádná autorita v místopise, ale zrovna kde je sídliště Oskol včetně tamní železniční zastávky vím. Takže tipuju, že tohle v těch zdrojích mohl být omyl.
Sanniu (2017-12-20 10:01:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/125360348: embarkment should be embankment, yes?
zstadler (2017-12-21 07:32:56+00:00): Yes. Corrected.
GOwin (2016-01-31 01:29:53+00:00): Cool! I hope you'd complete the Green Frog bus route relation, too. :)

For your reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Buses

If you need anything, ping other mappers for a hand:
* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)
GOwin (2016-01-31 01:36:33+00:00): Here, check out an existing route:
http://www.osm.org/relation/4515959
rmikke (2016-04-26 06:42:55+00:00): What exactly is amenity=mobile_money shop=pharmacy? If they sell medicines, it should be amenity=pharmacy instead of shop=pharmacy. Maybe two POIs are needed here.
saintam1 (2016-01-30 21:53:29+00:00): Oops, that was my typo. Thanks and sorry about that.
Kilkenni (2016-02-01 11:26:12+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dbank
Будь ласка, зверніть увагу на те, як заведено відзначати банки.
Наприклад, "номер" - це насправді ref=*
R0bst3r (2016-01-31 21:10:02+00:00): Hi Franz, after consultation with DWG this entries are from seo spammers and can be removed.
Regards R0bst3r
Alecs01 (2016-05-01 09:27:54+00:00): Hi Martin, you marked hundreds of rivers/streams as intermittents (here and in some other changesets), are you sure? how did you check all of them? you mention PDOK as a source, what is that?
Martin Borsje (2016-05-01 14:05:52+00:00): Hi Alec.

Thanks for contacting.

First of all: the referred source PDOK is not correct; this is a Dutch topographic source which was still mentioned as a copy artefact in JSOM.

You are right that I did not have check all the streams that I added "intermittent" to.

But: I bike and kike already for over 15 years in around Lake Como and it region.
I noticed on OSM that many small streams were drawn on the map (possibly imported?), mapped as 'stream' or even 'river'.

In fact by most of these small streams are intermittent and dry in the summer, execpt after heavy or long rainfall.
This by the conditions that:
- the intermittent streams do not have snow or groundwater as source
- the amount of rain in summer is quite low
- the temperature is high, which together with the vegetation, causes a lot of evaporative losses of water, so no rain water left in streams
- the ground in most of the area is quite permeable for water, which causes the most of the water disappear.
- the naming of the different streams as 'torrente' meaning mostly dry and only filled with water after heavy rain, winter snow melt.

This to my observation when hiking and biking there, sometimes looking for cool water, that in fact nearly all of these streams are dry in summer, even after rainfall decided to map these as intermittent.

I do acknowledge that there is a very slight chance I have erroneously drawn intermittent on a continuous stream, but I judge that chance small.

But feel free if you know continuous streams, or even 'rivers' to remove the tag intermittent.

Cheers and thanks for your cooperation

Martin
Alecs01 (2016-05-01 17:22:43+00:00): Thank you, good point. Most if not all waterways in Lombardy have been imported years ago, there could be small mistakes (I spotted a few) and the original data didn't have any information on seasonal streams as far as I know. As long as you know the area, that's fine for me. Cheers. Alessandro
R0bst3r (2016-01-31 21:28:32+00:00): Adapt hours to defined opening_hours key.
rab (2016-01-30 22:48:19+00:00): Hi, josm should tell you, that it is not correct to place a building node inside a building way. Why can't you use "addr:housenumber", as everywhere else in the world and also in Dvizarasekwa?
Thomas Hills (2016-01-31 12:47:42+00:00): Hi @rab,

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I shouldn't have put the nodes within the actual buildings. I will move them.

Just a bit of context - we have some survey field papers that we are trying to load into OSM. Unfortunately we were unable to get all of Epworth surveyed but we are trying to digitise all the information we have.

The house numbers here do not relate to streets - they are similar to conscription numbers. In the wiki it is suggested that you don't use addr:housenumber without addr:street. I realise that this specific part of Epworth has named streets but these are not available for the vast majority of the settlement.

Furthermore, the history of the area means that there are rather large plots which are sequentially numbered in a particular area. However, more buildings have been built on the plots, and it is difficult (and perhaps pointless) to try and identify which is the primary, permanent or original structure. This is why we haven't been tagging individual buildings for most of the project. However, some people have done this - the standard for the project has evolved over time, and at the moment my priority is to get all the information into OSM from the survey sheets, and then I'll go back and standardise all the entries across Epworth.

The project is documented on the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Epworth_Mapping_Project

I've had a bit of a search around in the wiki surrounding addr: tags, and I think I will add addr:place=Epworth to all the address nodes. I'll also discuss changes that we could make with the other project contributors. What do you think?

Thanks once again,

Tom
Thomas Hills (2016-01-31 13:06:15+00:00): Also, I think I'll remove the building=residential tag from the nodes, since it's the plot rather than the building being tagged.
rab (2016-01-31 13:43:55+00:00): Thomas,
as far as I understand the wiki addr:housenumber can either be used in conjunction with addr:street or addr:place, in case the street name is not a part of the address.
When using the building tag we will get a wrong counting for buildings and with the name tag we would run into conflicts with already named buildings like churches or shops. So in my opinion , like you already suggested, it would be best to place a address node or add the information to one or more existing house shapes.
Regards Ralf
Thomas Hills (2016-01-31 14:15:34+00:00): Righto - I'll get on that. It might take me a while (I'm writing up a thesis at the moment...) but I'll keep inputting data from the surveys and also go back and standardise the rest. Shouldn't be too difficult with an overpass turbo command.

Thanks for your help!
Martin Borsje (2016-01-30 23:19:12+00:00): Beste AvE, je hebt een par dingen fout gedaan: je hebt en multipolygon aangemaakt (onnodig) die bovendien niet klopt en het adresnummer 74 komt nu tweemaal voor. Kun je dit herstellen aub? Indien hulp benodigd: laat het dan weten.
marczoutendijk (2016-01-31 21:27:26+00:00): Zie ook mijn welkomstmail met tips!
naoliv (2016-02-04 01:50:06+00:00): yoshichika, não adicione proibições de retorno quando a origem e destino for a própria via. Já é entendido que não se pode retornar na mesma rua.