piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 16:00:12+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10466235

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10466236

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
AntMadeira (2021-05-12 19:01:18+00:00): Olá, Marcos.
Obrigado pelo contacto.

Essas duas restrições foram um erro meu quando mapeei esse trecho, pois eu não costumo usar esse tipo de restrição na mesma via. Se reparares, não a usei no resto do cruzamento circular.
Já corrigi essas restrições.

Cumprimentos,
António.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 10:39:42+00:00): Olá António,

muito obrigado pelo retorno e esclarecimentos!
mapman44 (2020-01-09 02:38:00+00:00): Please review the Wiki article on "Imagery Offset" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#ID

You moved streets and added new objects without adjusting the Bing imagery to the existing OSM objects. It has resulted in some very bad geometry in this changeset. For example, look at the traffic circle where Metolius Drive and Skyline Ranch Road intersect. I am going to fix this but in the future before making edits please adjust the imagery to the existing OSM objects.
mapman44 (2020-01-09 02:40:12+00:00): I will fix the streets but you will have to fix the position of the golf course objects after you adjust the imagery offset.
Sowa1980 (2019-12-24 19:47:21+00:00): Причина массового удаления?
ForstEK (2019-12-24 20:32:35+00:00): Clear from trash lines without any tags
ForstEK (2019-12-24 20:35:39+00:00): Удаление мусорных линий без тэгов.
ForstEK (2019-12-24 20:40:11+00:00): Надо проверять хотя бы валидатор JOSM перед отправкой на предмет ошибок.
Sowa1980 (2019-12-24 20:40:30+00:00): Из них предполагалось дорисовать мультиполигоны, теперь что повторно рисовать? Там мульти полигоны здоровые долны били быть. Короче я откачу жтот пакет.
ForstEK (2019-12-24 20:42:01+00:00): Если предполагалось, то надо сразу рисовать, а не лить в базу весь свой мусор, который там по два года лежит.
Sowa1980 (2019-12-24 20:58:09+00:00): Он по два года не лежит, это первое. второе я рисую на столько на сколько у меня хватает времени , а то то поверь можешь посмотреть по моим правках не мало учесть, что правлю я постоянно.
iWowik (2019-12-25 07:07:57+00:00): Ну перед удалением можно было бы и просто спросить о причине появления этих линий.
Если много сложных объектов редактируется, то сохранение промежуточных вариантов вполне нормальная практика. А промежуточные варианты на то и промежуточны, что не до конца доделаны и могут формально  содержать ошибки.
iWowik (2019-12-25 07:11:07+00:00): Но год уж этим линиям и это явный перебор, но писать вопросы никогда не поздно.
ForstEK (2019-12-25 12:37:48+00:00): Если бы в моих объектах нашли такой мусор (что было всего один раз, и я с лёгкостью согласился, чтобы такую пустую точку удалили), я бы не ерепенился и признал ошибку, и поблагодарил человека, подчистившего мусор. Не важно, сколько ты правок делаешь, главное - чтобы в них была ценность. В пустых линиях из двух-трёх точек ценности нет. Для этого есть валидатор JOSM, в нём достаточно нажать одну кнопку, чтобы исправить подобные очевидные ошибки.
ndm (2019-12-24 00:35:37+00:00): I've removed the through road to Moorlands Road -- clearly not present on Bing Streetside.
eggie (2019-12-23 19:13:48+00:00): Oke Top Wim!
Bij die kassen heb ik de adressen al weggehaald.
Gr eggie
SHARCRASH (2019-12-23 19:11:57+00:00): + updates, tag corrections
SomeoneElse (2019-12-24 18:11:27+00:00): Hello,
It looks like another user (with a history of questionable edits) has deleted Galton Creek Campground that you added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080483151/history .  Would you like me to undelete it?
Best Regards,
Andy
KalifG (2019-12-25 00:44:49+00:00): Yes, please, that would be fantastic.  Thank you for letting me know!
IgorEliezer (2020-01-09 06:14:07+00:00): Aqui não para trens de passageiros, portanto public_transport=station e railway=station não se aplicam. Do contrário, apps e sites vão mostrar isso como estação de transporte público.
Glassman (2019-12-24 00:00:46+00:00): looking at the image, it appears that some of the buildings may not be part of Bullseye Creative. If that's true, then only the building that Bullseye occupies should be tagged. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78787398
aspen11 (2020-01-22 22:46:30+00:00): When will the U-turn be added?
pio2_122 (2019-12-23 19:49:11+00:00): Mała uwaga: nie umieszczaj punktów (typu shop, czy amenity) blisko środka budynku, ponieważ zasłaniają one numer budynku.
W tym przypadku chodzi mi o: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080478481 - specjalnie nie ruszam punktu, aby było widać problem, który opisałem.
Z góry dzięki.
RicoElectrico (2020-03-07 10:44:58+00:00): Hej, zamknąłem Ci uwagę, bo zapomniałeś ;-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/565699
Josbert Lonnee (2020-01-01 14:05:25+00:00): Hee, Gemeente Enschede is een wanbeleid aan het voeren t.b.v. fietsers. Vandaar dat deze gemeente onoverzichtelijke (c.q. onveilige) kruisingen aanlegt waarbij de voorrangssituatie niet aansluit bij de behoefte van het verkeer. Ook wordt het gebruik van de wegen nauwelijks beïnvloed; zo rijdt hier iedereen gewoon nog steeds voornamelijk route "Hengelosestraat" die voorheen voorrang had.
Wat mij betreft leiden we de classificatie van wegen binnen steden af van de daadwerkelijke drukte van die wegen. Hoe denk jij hierover?
josq (2020-01-02 09:18:32+00:00): Hallo, bedankt voor je reactie! Drukte is inderdaad een belangrijke factor, maar ikzelf probeer altijd veel meer factoren mee te wegen, zoals maximumsnelheid (50 vs 30), weginrichting (drempels e.d.), kwaliteit van het wegdek (asfalt), en verbindingsfunctie tussen gebieden (Raffeissenstraat is onderdeel van de verbinding tussen Enschede-Noord met het ziekenhuis en alles zuidelijk daarvan)
GerdP (2023-12-29 06:30:27+00:00): Moin!
Hier ist irgendwas schiefgegangen:
https://www.osm.org/way/204002752
Du hast diverse Tags an den Zaun "gehängt", aber die gehören wohl eher an die landuse-Fläche oder die Dinger darauf? Die Telefonnummer finde ich auf meinen Fotos an der Tür von dem Gebäude https://www.osm.org/way/204002707.
Da steht auch "Reglerhaus" und GDRM-Anlage, was auch immer das bedeutet.
jmsbert (2023-12-29 09:40:40+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Ja, das sollte so nicht sein - insbesondere die Telefon-Nummer hätte dem gleichen Objekt zugewiesen werden sollen an dem auch die restlichen Tags hingen (u.a. landuse=industrial; name=GDRM Anlage Groß-Ippener / Annenheide;
operator=Open Grid Europe GmbH)
Ich habe die relevanten Tags nun dem neuen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235143580 zugewiesen. Der Weg #204002752 behält somit nur noch die Eigenschaft "barrier=fence". Die getrennte Erfassung von Zäunen und Landnutzungen, war mir damals noch nicht bekannt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dfence#Wie_kartieren?). Ich hoffe, es passt nun so...

P.S. Im GDRM Gebäude findet eine Überspeisung aus einem Gasnetz höheren Drucks in eines mit geringerem Betriebsdruck statt, aus dem dann z.B. lokale Verbraucher versorgt werden. Hierbei wird dann auch die Gasmenge genau erfasst.
GerdP (2023-12-29 10:59:45+00:00): OK, danke, müsste so passen. Bei den Flächen um die Brunnen dort suche ich nochmal nach geeigneten Tags...
abrensch (2019-12-29 10:07:38+00:00): Hallo shoegazer,

ist diese Abfahrt hier wirklich noch gesperrt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699646070

Weil ja auch der nördliche Anschluss an die alte Ortsdurchfahrt Theissen nicht befahrbar ist, wäre Theissen so nur von Süden aus erreichbar?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
shoegazer (2019-12-29 11:07:01+00:00): Hallo,
es ist aber tatsächlich so. Der Grund dürften fehlende Markierungen / Schutzeinrichtungen sein.
Grüße
osmviborg (2019-12-23 21:44:51+00:00): 'Langebæk Præstegård' forsvandt fordi du valgte at bevare din egen nye polygon.
Hjart (2019-12-24 08:32:00+00:00): Netop. Når du sletter gamle bygninger og indtegner/importerer nye, risikerer du alt for let at skrotte værdifuld information.
user_5359 (2019-12-24 05:36:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Klaus Schwer (2020-02-09 17:33:52+00:00): What have you done to the Tren Urbano? railway=subway is correct.
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:42:02+00:00): I thought it was the wrong category.
eggie (2019-12-23 21:52:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2019-12-24 08:37:06+00:00): Hi,
could you check the POIs you added recently? They got some strange tags:

Numéro de téléphone public (ex : +33 1 23 45 67 89))=+33 2 98 55 60 80

Source (d'où viennent les infos de votre saisie)=Site internet des Repairs Cafés du Finistère (avec son accord)

The first one should be just 'phone' and the second one 'source'. It looks like something is wrong with autocompletion in your editor.

Thanks!
Jan
mueschel (2019-12-24 08:40:24+00:00): I also found a very long operator tag that contains a description:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080090385

Or an email with a lot of text:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080189085

And an email address with special characters at the end:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080118786
chris-ren (2019-12-24 09:04:26+00:00): Thanks. I was using a tool (MapContrib) and it was not well configured.
eggie (2019-12-23 22:03:10+00:00): Dag luuc.. Wanneer je iets verwijderd check altijd of de aansluitende wegen nog met elkaar zijn verbonden. 
Pak een node beet en kijk of de rest meekomt als je 'm iets verplaatst.
Ik heb het hersteld.
Dit was je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78790482
Gr eggie
luucc (2019-12-24 13:44:50+00:00): Excuus, de editor werkt nogal traag in Safari, dus niet goed opgelet. Is mijn hele edit nu verwijderd? Of heb je alleen die node gecorrigeerd?
Goed dat je meekijkt!
eggie (2019-12-24 14:42:30+00:00): Nee hoor.. Er zal alleen wat los omdat je een stuk weg had verwijderd incl. de verbindingsnode op de parkeerplaats zelf.
Je kunt het niet zien, daarom altijd even checken.
Die zit nu weer vast.
MVG,
Eggie
Glassman (2019-12-24 00:08:10+00:00): Is access to the trail really restricted? Usually trails are open to the public.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78790742
larsfink (2019-12-24 03:57:02+00:00): there are no trespassing signs at trailhead and the trail is predominantly on private timber land
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78790742
maxerickson (2020-07-19 15:01:52+00:00): An 'st' went into the wrong field for way 7312271 here.
Dion Dock (2020-07-21 01:56:22+00:00): I think that's fixed now?  I was trying to expand the "West" abbreviation.

Also, I'm not familiar with the name:prefix tag; it looks like "W" is actually part of the street name and should be expanded out to West.  Otherwise, it seems like the W/West needs to be removed from the name entirely.
maxerickson (2020-07-21 02:14:14+00:00): Yeah I fixed it at about the same time I commented.

The name:prefix came from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6786718 and I think is not widely used (At least not like here. It's used a lot in Russia: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Aprefix#map ).

I don't quite remember why I felt the need to comment though.
eggie (2019-12-24 08:13:18+00:00): Dag JHCadzand.. In dit geval hield je verfijning in dat er nu helemaal niets meer is .. alleen nog een lijn met een surfacetag?
De bijdrage van de voorgaande mapper is helemaal verdwenen.
Wat is je bedoeling hier?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-24 08:35:02+00:00): Nu was het wel erg leeg geworden in die haven zonder steigers.
Met een revert heb ik de edits van de voorgaande mapper gedeeltelijk  hersteld. Dat leek inderdaad niet meer zoals het nu is... Dat behoeft zeker revisie. 
Je kunt het evt. weer afmaken. Half afgemaakt werk beter niet laten liggen. Maak je het zelf af?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-24 10:08:04+00:00): PB contact
eggie (2019-12-24 06:56:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Glassman (2019-12-24 00:08:54+00:00): The trail you added onto the existing is private yet the trail to the east is not. Is that correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78791538
larsfink (2019-12-24 03:56:14+00:00): both are on private land
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78791538
yvecai (2019-12-24 05:04:08+00:00): Salut,
Alors piste:type=downhill, c'est pour mapper une piste de ski de descente, pas une station complète. Quand tu traces un polygone landuse=winter_sport pour une station, on sait retrouver les pistes qui sont incluses dedans puisque OSM est une base de données géographiques :)
Canyonsrcool (2020-01-02 16:31:11+00:00): What is your source for the name change?  I don't believe it is accurate since your old username used to be Willcallewaert.
Polarbear-repair (2020-01-20 21:08:38+00:00): Thanks @Canyonsrcool for fixing it.
Polarbear-repair (2020-01-20 21:03:57+00:00): This CS was reverted in 79817577 with the comment: 
US: revert vandalism, DWG Ticket#2020012010000056, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3388
JonSmith12 (2019-12-23 23:53:23+00:00): This is accurate. Will Callewaert was recently named the Head of the Board. Following his election by the board, the street formerly known as Lyford Cay Drive has since been renamed to Will Callewaert Drive due to the success of his fundraising drive geared to much needed road repairs.
InsertUser (2019-12-25 23:10:10+00:00): This seems to be an odd conversation on a changeset that didn't change the name of the street. 
P.S. the dual carriageway part by the roundabout still has the old name.
Canyonsrcool (2020-01-02 16:31:01+00:00): I don't believe this is accurate.  I've been here.  What is your source?  Your old username used to be Willcallewaert so I think this could be vandalism.
freebeer (2020-01-20 07:52:41+00:00): Which Board?  and why has this fiction as well as the others not yet been reverted?
Canyonsrcool (2020-01-20 17:53:09+00:00): Has been reverted.
netkom24 (2019-12-24 00:06:56+00:00): budynek spalony magazyn tak samo firmy weba i modulo
freebeer (2020-01-20 08:42:18+00:00): No, really.  When I feed `arsonist' and `Callewaert' into the search engine of my choice, there are too many results off-limits to europe, so you're going to have to help me out, as a different Callewaert perished in an inferno in Tennessee; Willy, don't be a hero, don't be a fool with your life.  Why so shy?  I mean, help us yurpeens out of our Fake News state-run propaganda organs, and explain why Will set fire to his ant farm, then had a change of heart and rescued them.  Else your local hero won't get the praise as fundraising nature-lovin' bahamas life-savin' board director that he deserves.
Polarbear-repair (2020-01-20 20:55:34+00:00): This CS was reverted in 79817172 with the comment:
US: revert vandalism, DWG Ticket#2020012010000056, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3388
gscscnd (2019-12-24 08:41:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power
MonteAlbert (2019-12-24 19:19:50+00:00): Who is drawing this worldwide rectangle?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 03:55:41+00:00): Hi MonteAlbert,

thanks for your scrutinizing view.
I change my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Greetings,
Chriss
charl3s (2019-12-24 23:01:52+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniać przebiegu dróg dojazdowych, chodników przy ul. Kleeberga ponieważ własnoręcznie naniosłem te linie na mapę z danych GPS, które zbierałem samodzielnie. Zdjęcia satelitarne są nieaktualne, nawet nie ma na nich tych dróg.
Przejścia dla pieszych w Kocku oznaczamy uncontrolled ponieważ nie ma u nas sygnalizacji świetlnej, jedynie jest migające światło ostrzegawcze, ale nie jest to powodem do oznaczania jako marked.
charl3s (2019-12-24 23:01:31+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniać przebiegu dróg dojazdowych, chodników przy ul. Kleeberga ponieważ własnoręcznie naniosłem te linie na mapę z danych GPS, które zbierałem samodzielnie. Zdjęcia satelitarne są nieaktualne, nawet nie ma na nich tych dróg. 
Przejścia dla pieszych w Kocku oznaczamy uncontrolled ponieważ nie ma u nas sygnalizacji świetlnej, jedynie jest migające światło ostrzegawcze, ale nie jest to powodem do oznaczania jako marked.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-24 01:11:24+00:00): [Edmonton, AB] add other shops and restaurants inside WEM
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-12-24 01:19:53+00:00): Hello, why did you delete the landuse=residential ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78793962
Supaplex (2020-01-03 14:52:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-24 02:39:28+00:00): [Edmonton, AB] add other shops on WEM Phases III and IV
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-24 02:44:22+00:00): [Edmonton, AB] add dollar store at WEM Phase IV
rskedgell (2019-12-24 10:08:33+00:00): No, your repeated vandalism is NOT "ok". This imaginary park does not exist. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78812808 #DWG
Veaserd (2019-12-24 20:56:06+00:00): @rskedgell Ok, boomer
rskedgell (2019-12-24 22:55:20+00:00): I didn't know you had two accounts, thanks for letting me know.
Veaserd (2019-12-25 00:03:58+00:00): There's a difference between being friends and having 2 accounts. Plus I find this amusing
rskedgell (2019-12-24 10:52:33+00:00): As you state, they are "part of" Queens Park, therefore they are not 3 separate parks in their own right. You have also erased the information that two of these areas are covered by trees (natural=wood) and one by grass (landuse=grass).

What would be really helpful would be if you were to map the extent of Queens Park as a single area and leave the more descriptive tagging of areas within the park unchanged, or better still, improved in accuracy and detail.
rskedgell (2019-12-24 10:16:43+00:00): As you say, they are "part of" Queens Park, therefore they are not parks in their own right. If you believe that the previous tagging of them as landuse=scrub is incorrect, please tag them as something useful and meaningful. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dgrassland for some possibilities.
rskedgell (2019-12-24 10:39:04+00:00): Mill Meadows Nature Reserve already exists (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639530686 ), as the area enclosing the three areas of natural=wood which you have edited. Your edit has removed the information that those areas are covered by trees.

Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood

Fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78814230
rskedgell (2019-12-24 10:21:48+00:00): It's a building which contains a swimming pool. There was no need to delete the building=yes tag for the building, as the building is still there. 

Please also note that the wiki states:
"The tag leisure=swimming_pool should only be used for the water area of the swimming pool. A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focussed on swimming as a sport) should be tagged leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
redd (2022-06-12 13:53:41+00:00): Hi Alwayzs_Dreamin,
did you add the website_1 maybe on mistake?
Always_Dreamin (2022-06-12 17:44:32+00:00): You are correct. I did make this error. I have corrected my other website_1 tags I added as well. I did not realize at the time this was a flawed tagging system. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Cheers
redd (2022-06-12 19:01:02+00:00): Thanks for the quick response!
abakus_uploader (2019-12-24 23:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
b-jazz (2019-12-27 01:47:58+00:00): I believe your comment said that I added or modified an address, but that is incorrect. The bot edited another tag in the object and your changeset comment (that I agree with in general) shouldn't have been made since my (bot's) change didn't actually touch the address.
jendrusk (2020-01-02 09:51:57+00:00): Yes, you're right :) It's simple data watcher - I almost wrote better one but there is no time to finnish it and deploy :)
Meanwhile you can safely ommit this comments if you'll get one in the future :) Sorry for a problem :)
ACarlotti (2019-12-24 13:38:03+00:00): This link probably also no longer exists (see my comment on 78800735). I think this changeset should probably also be reverted (it maps part a temporary construction related to construction that has already finished).
Glassman (2019-12-24 15:58:48+00:00): Please do not vandalize OSM. Your changeset has been reverted and will be reported to DWG.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78800618
ACarlotti (2019-12-24 13:36:54+00:00): This is almost certainly not the current layout - since the A14 opened two weeks ago, I highly doubt that there is still a link onto the carriageway used by construction traffic (and if it does exist, then it won't for much longer). I think this needs reverting, unless you have more recent evidence (i.e. from the past two weeks) to show it still exists.
◪ Jarv (2019-12-24 21:55:23+00:00): I agree with Acarlotti.
No need for these "service" roads off the DC
priymose (2019-12-27 10:18:12+00:00): Hi Acarlotti,

Thanks for looking into my edit. I don't have the latest evidence as mentioned above. Hence reverted the changeset. Please refer the changeset (78919543) for the modification done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
priymose.