piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sq7obj (2015-10-22 17:07:19+00:00): tunnel=culvert moim zdaniem nie pasuje, tym kanałem można chodzić, tak jak wieloma innymi - nie powinno to być po prostu jako tunnel=yes?
Bask (2015-10-27 17:09:46+00:00): Masz rację, ale widzę że już nie muszę zmieniać ;-)
Mars-Curaçao (2016-12-15 01:57:47+00:00): Haha, ground survey..... Did not notice it is Kaya Kachu , not Kaya Kashu lol.
srividya_c (2015-10-28 05:16:27+00:00): [test](openstreetmap.org)
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-11-27 11:13:33+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475000
Warin61 (2017-03-24 00:24:55+00:00): Relation  	5607069 has no tags... 
the inner looks like a residential area (bing)

But has the same tags as the outer - protected area ...  

Possibly the relationship should have the protected tags, and the inner should be landuse=residential???
Warin61 (2017-04-02 22:29:52+00:00): No communication. 
Changed to what I think it should be.
BeKri (2015-10-21 16:49:49+00:00): Hi,
could you please leave
out "opening_hours=" 
in  the tag opening_hours= ?
levin_rod (2015-10-21 16:56:34+00:00): Whoops! I misunderstood how that worked. Thanks! I'll fix that and the others that I added.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
GerdP (2015-12-12 19:57:55+00:00): Hi there!
Please check the tag lanes=-2
Did you mean layer=-2 or lanes=2 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123664270
Same problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123663710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123664139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123664263
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
chnav (2015-10-22 11:14:23+00:00): Большая просьба ничего не удаляйте пока не появится достаточно опыта !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
malenki (2015-10-22 15:44:44+00:00): Da eine ganze Straße keine Hausnummer hat, habe ich die Zeppelinstraße wieder nach Zeppelinstraße umbenannt.¹ 
Das Ferienhaus kannst du trotzdem gern eintragen. :)

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34214696/history
mavl (2015-10-22 16:56:28+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
А что именно блокируется?
mavl (2015-10-22 17:33:52+00:00): Убрал одностроннее движение и изменил статус у этих участков:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102771845  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22729432  
  
Это нужно было сделать?
anpk (2015-10-23 16:18:45+00:00): Блокировал редактирование автобусный маршрут. Из-за него дорога не редактировалась. Маршрут тоже не редактировался потому что-то "не скачано". Сейчас вроде все правильно сделали.
letihu (2016-05-21 09:29:58+00:00): Die Wege als Relation zu mappen finde ich nicht so glücklich.
Sie werden dann auch nicht in der Karte angezeigt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376285730/history
SomeoneElse (2015-11-22 22:39:57+00:00): Are you sure that the "bar" that you've edited at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3396907102/history actually exists?  It seems implausible to me that a 24/7 bar should be open in a residential area of Buxton.  The housename, housenumber, name and operator all suggest to me that it's just added by someone as a joke.

If you're modifying data (even quite a lot of data, as you are here) you really should check all of the data that you are modifying to check that it seems sensible - otherwise you're just doing a blind mechanical edit.
canfe (2019-03-25 08:04:19+00:00): Quando ci sono tanti alberi in fila non sarebbe meglio usare
natural=tree_row

?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
YarNik (2015-11-02 20:29:51+00:00): а зачем ты проездные улицы выставляешь как highway=service ?
Почитай про них тут http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highway
Кроме того, доступ к улицам типа highway=residential  не может быть через "сервисные"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
reittiloki (2015-10-21 20:42:05+00:00): Koskee siis parkkipaikkoja, niitä lisätty.
parukhin (2016-05-23 21:24:03+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Подскажите, зачем удалили берег у Малошуйки?
5m4u9 (2015-10-21 22:23:38+00:00): Gracias por tus contribuciones!

Voy a quitar la website en esta edición porque ya tenía contact:website :).

Recuerda fijarte en la parte inferior (TODAS LAS ETIQUETAS)...https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2392562845
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
jptolosa (2015-11-19 03:57:08+00:00): El tramo de la calle Manuel Bulnes a partir de calle Colón hasta el puente Matadero es doble vía.
maxerickson (2015-12-04 04:17:07+00:00): You could consider using uMap for event routes and the like. Here's an example made by importing the route you had saved:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/anonymous-edit/62564%3AogYGbpr2TNlNiNJznIpQYl7JcYQ
muralito (2015-10-22 11:14:29+00:00): Hola WillyHenry.
Para que sea util y aparezca en los mapas y/o en las busquedas cada elemento le tendrias que agregar el tipo de elemento.
Saludos,
M.
ToeBee (2015-10-22 01:37:06+00:00): I see you found the edit button :)  

I see you added a point with an address and a name of "Home Depot" which is good but you didn't mark the fact that it is a store (or specifically a hardware store). If you go back into edit mode and click on the point you created, it will say "Address" in the bar at the top of the left panel. If you click on that and then start typing "Home Depot" the editor presets should find and show a "Home Depot - DIY store" option. Click on that and then save that change. Then the store will be properly marked as a store.

Thanks for your contribution!
ToeBee (2015-10-22 07:24:03+00:00): I fixed it :)
seav (2015-10-28 16:21:09+00:00): Hi! Why did you delete several street names?
Thilina (2015-10-23 02:54:08+00:00): please reverse this change set . this is totally destroy the road
SomeoneElse (2020-02-14 00:43:11+00:00): The source on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376322046 seems a little unconventional.  Perhaps "survey" would have been more descriptive?
Athalis (2015-10-31 21:01:00+00:00): I aligned the data with bing imagery. Why did you shift everything?
Warin61 (2019-05-30 10:29:22+00:00): Hi 
What is the source of the 'park' way 376336555 ?

The LPI base map has a smaller park in that area
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-10-22 09:39:29+00:00): No chyba żartujesz: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374257923
Canyonsrcool (2015-11-02 17:23:54+00:00): Street signs are "Jose Papa Liberia".  OSM wiki states "you should always enter the full name as it appears on the street name signs."
zarl (2015-11-19 10:28:16+00:00): Hi crisshu,

du hast den Pfad http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168903889/history auf layer=1 gesetzt, das ist aber ohne irgendwelche unten durch laufende Bäche etc. nicht notwendig. Die Datenbank vermutet jetzt, der Weg hängt irgendwo in der Luft. Eine Hängebrücke? ;-)

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer

Ciao,
Zarl
zarl (2015-11-19 10:31:50+00:00): Hier findest du noch andere Vorkommen, dann kannst du das bequem selbst korrigieren: 
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/?username=chrisshu#
Ciao,
Zarl
Montgomery (2015-10-25 23:23:32+00:00): Desconocía que oficialmente la CL-615 solo llegara hasta ese punto. De todos modos, si la Avenida de Asturias pierde ese tag, lo correcto sería dejarlo como "tertiary" por la importancia de esa calle para el ordenamiento del tráfico en la ciudad. Si estás haciendo mejoras de este tipo estaría bien fijarse en detalles como ese. En este caso ya lo he solucionado yo.
研究用 (2015-10-22 08:49:15+00:00): a
GerdP (2015-10-23 07:53:13+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=gate seems to be a typo? Maybe highway=stop was meant?
nodes 3797792315, 3797792131,
and 3797792210
Netzach (2015-10-25 10:25:33+00:00): This tag 'highway=gate' is a typo. That mean 'barrier=gate'.
GerdP (2015-10-25 10:29:23+00:00): okay, thanks. Will you change all three
of them?
Netzach (2015-10-25 10:33:40+00:00): Already I corrected these tags.
GerdP (2015-10-25 10:35:31+00:00): great, thanks!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-10-22 22:55:04+00:00): Przypominam o prawidłowym (kompletnym) tagowaniu adresów. Tutaj jest to opisane: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
user_5359 (2015-10-22 20:20:26+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Sicher mit dem Straßennamen oder doch eher "Zum Dorfhaus"?
user_6110846 (2017-11-09 08:37:04+00:00): Добрый день http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=34794465  обьясните на основании чего принято решение о изменении  линии границы и предоставьте пожалуйста даные осогласовании этой правки с ДВГ или украинским сообществом . Если это отсуствует при всем уважении к вашему труду я вынужден откатить как спорную / несогласованную с другими участниками проекта. Если Вы уверенны в полезности правки - аргументируйте .
Антон-1983 (2017-11-14 19:30:45+00:00): 2 года прошло... Вспомнить бы.

Я занимался отрисовкой пограничной зоны РБ. Для этого раздробил линии границ. При этом физическое положение границ не менял. Присвоил значения отношения Погранзона РБ. 

Труд очень большой сделал - второй раз уже не буду делать. Прошу на взаимопонимание без всяких откатов.
user_6110846 (2017-11-14 21:01:23+00:00): Я поднял кипиш для  того чт об ВЫ научились работать с полигонами так чтоб н е сдвигать линии границы вообще . Анализатор показал что сдвиг линии был 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/filters - забиваете номер правки 
Если регулярно каждый будет по 10 км сдвигать то проделанной работы  сождателя границ останется искажение .
RicoElectrico (2015-10-22 09:02:42+00:00): Jaki jest powód usunięcia tej relacji DW?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2327667/history
Dawid | Yanosik (2015-10-22 09:50:34+00:00): Pomyłka podczas edycji, Wszystko zostało przywrócone
Supaplex (2015-10-22 10:04:47+00:00): 其实可以不用打全称，name用一般特称的名称，再用编辑器中的+自订标签，加上full_name
极客行者 (2015-10-23 13:04:42+00:00): 谢谢，新手一名，还请多多指教。
mavl (2015-10-22 17:38:12+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
Названия озёр принято писать в виде «озеро Большое Песьяное».  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
anderfo (2024-05-06 12:19:55+00:00): Hi,
for way 376352051 (which you created in this changeset, about 8 years ago) and its nearby segments  which probably stem from the same original way, I struggle to understand what mtb:scale=1; 0 means. The tag has been like this for 8 years but does not make sense.

Can you clarify?

Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale and reconsider the use of this tag.
Could it be that you have tried to merge several trails that had different values for mtb:scale, and the program (Potlatch in this case) has merged those? That is a bad idea :) I hope you can figure out how to set mtb:scale for the various parts of the trail.

Cheers
SomeoneElse (2015-11-30 10:55:08+00:00): Hi,
Just wondering how http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376352067 gets across the A38?  Is there an underpass or a bridge or something, or to pedestrians have to run across the A38?
Derby45 (2015-11-30 13:25:03+00:00): Hi, pedestrians have to run across! There is a small path and gap through the central barrier. This can be seen from https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.8442158,-1.5963175,3a,75y,292.42h,65.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIXdUiaG0I5LnKwPGqihHjA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Hope this helps.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-30 13:36:58+00:00): Thanks - in that case the footpath should be joined to the A38 carriageways then.  As a driver I don't remember seeing a sign for the crossing, so as a pedestrian I don't think I'd want to cross the road there if I could avoid it!
SomeoneElse (2015-12-08 18:29:03+00:00): For info, I've now joined in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35831558 .
malenki (2015-10-22 15:57:32+00:00): Aus "Am Teehaus" habe ich (wieder) "Am Teerhaus" gemacht. :)
–> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36910132
Hjart (2015-10-25 08:07:37+00:00): Potlatch kan åbenbart i nogle tilfælde finde på at lave en såkaldt "single node in way" (se i dag http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=10.41089&lat=55.36982&zoom=18&overlays=single_node_in_way). Jeg ved ikke hvor meget skade de egentlig gør, men nu har jeg lige fjernet 4 der stammer fra dette rettesæt, bl.a. et par på busstoppederne ved Forskerparken.
Mo Li Hansen (2015-10-28 08:55:01+00:00): Ok
Disse "single node in a way" opstod på følgende måde: 
En tidligere mapper havde oprettet stoppesteder på en node i vejen til Forskerparken. Da vejen skulle laves om, klippede jeg vejstykket med stoppested ud for at bevare detaljerne. Så lavede jeg ny vej - og slettede overflødige punkter på vejstykket med stoppestedet, så det kun var et enkelt punkt (node).
Jeg var ikke opmærksom på, at det stadig var en way - med 1 node.
Jeg tror jeg har lavet mange af den slags "single node in a way". 
Jeg ville også gerne vide, om det er ok eller et problem ...
NB
Når du sletter en way og erstatter med et nyt punkt, forsvinder historikken. Aktuelt ser det nu ud som om jeg har oprettet stoppestederne ved forskerparken - men de er tidligere oprettet og redigeret og eventuelt kommenteret af andre, som nu er ukendte...
Mo Li Hansen (2015-10-28 09:09:28+00:00): NB
Et af stoppestederne har stadig historikken i behold, så tidligere NB er vist ikke helt rigtig - måske er jeg selv årsag til historikkens forsvinden på det andet stoppested, da jeg klippede vejstykket ud ...
Hjart (2015-10-28 10:51:27+00:00): Jeg har ingen ide om hvor stort et problem disse single-node-in-way egentlig er (der er sikkert en god teknisk forklaring, som jeg dog ikke umiddelbart gider dykke dybere ned i), men de optræder på OSMI og for holde det ryddeligt nok til ikke at overse alvorlige fejl, retter vi simpelthen alt.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/20249/osm-inspector-reports-single-node-in-way
rskedgell (2025-06-03 07:58:30+00:00): Adding an entirely fictitious and legally improbable weight restriction is vandalism, not an improvement.
muralito (2015-10-23 13:49:07+00:00): ¿estas calles irregulares que mapeaste permiten que circulen autos?
Departamento de Geografía - MIDES (2015-10-23 13:58:34+00:00): Como todo asentamiento de Montevideo que esta mapeado en OSM, algunas calles si, otras no. 

Hice una navegación de varios asentamientos de Montevideo, y no existe consenso para mapear esto. 

Si hay problema con el highway= residential, perfectamente se puede cambiar a Sendas.

Confio en tu experiencia como usuario de OSM. 

Cualquier cambio en la zona de Servando Gomez que se mapeo por mi persona que  hagas bienvenido. 

Si existe algun otro problema no dudes en avisarme. 

Gracias muralito
SomeoneElse (2015-10-22 23:54:47+00:00): As with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34448963 , DPD here seems to be duplicated both as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103637287 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3798145588 .   There should only be one thing in OSM for each thing in the real world - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element , otherwise it'll look like there are 2 DPD entities here and not just 1.
glglgl (2016-01-13 15:46:24+00:00): Danke fürs Wiederherstellen. Aber sicher, daß das L 258 ist? Die ist eigentlich woanders (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5510779), und dieser Abschnitt hier war laut Historie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25040090/history) früher L 257...
glglgl (2016-01-13 17:11:41+00:00): Hat sich erledigt; ich war selbst vor Ort und habe noch ein Stationszeichen L 257 gefunden und daher die Relation und die Straßen-refs angepaßt. Ist also erledigt.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-22 20:18:39+00:00): Hello, you've added "maxweight=2.0" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315560990 .  Are you sure about that? 2 tonnes is lighter than some private cars, and certainly very unusual on English roads.  Does it really apply to the whole section, or just the bridge over the stream?
SomeoneElse (2015-10-22 20:33:24+00:00): One more thing - "Improving road network" really isn't a helpful changeset comment.  It doesn't explain what change was made, or what the source of the new data was.

Previously you've been contacted on several changesets, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34039817 (which you replied, to but not with any useful information), https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34347292 , 34465062 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34530227 (and probably others) which you haven't replied to or corrected errors in.

OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project; we need to work together to create the best map possible.  This means that when other mappers ask you questions, you need to answer them.

You have been blocked twice in the past - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/816 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/818 and have ignored those warnings.  Specifically, you do need to also answer the questions raised there - most importantly the provenance of the data you're adding.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group).
Zain Ahmad Hashmi (2015-10-26 13:47:03+00:00): 2t weight restriction is for  the bridge over the stream
lostmike (2015-10-22 15:04:50+00:00): Highways are mapped as just lines not areas.  As described at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway and should not be used for areas.
Supaplex (2015-10-22 15:24:26+00:00): 里程碑用highway=milestone
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34802211
我改上去了
berndw (2017-04-02 17:01:38+00:00): Das ist nicht korrekt, die Beschilderung als Kraftfahrstraße Richtung Andernach steht erst in Namedy, ebenso endet die Kraftfahrstraße von Andernach dort. Zwischen Namedy und Brohl-Lützing gibt es für den landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr keine andere durchgehende Straße
lostmike (2015-10-22 15:18:28+00:00): Your shop appears to be in the middle of the High Street.
HolgerJeromin (2015-10-27 12:06:53+00:00): Ist der Hackerspace in Hausnummer 10-12 oder 12? 
Der aktuelle Eintrag "10-12;12" ist doch quatsch.
Und, dass hier eine Bar ist bezweifele ich auch :-)
jamasi (2015-11-02 23:20:32+00:00): Ich bin da nicht so sicher. Als Postanschrift funktioniert bisher Martinstraße 10-12 (2. Hinterhof rechts). "Bar" ist sicher nicht optimal, wobei der Voidspace ja Lounge und Hacker/Maker Space ist und über einen Mehrzweckraum verfügt, der des öfteren auch für Kulturveranstaltungen genutzt wird.
HolgerJeromin (2015-11-03 07:42:16+00:00): Definition: "In den meisten Ländern ist eine Bar eine Lokalität, welche alkoholische Getränke verkauft, die vor Ort getrunken werden können. Sie sind charakterisiert durch eine laute Atmosphäre vergleichbar mit einer Party." 
Ich verstehe ja, dass ihr den Hackerspace gerne auf der Standard-Karte sehen wollt, aber wenn ich abends was trinken will, will ich nicht bei euch vor der Tür landen...
trigpoint (2015-10-22 15:33:27+00:00): Your website says you sell only by mail order/online, or give an address. Do you have a physical shop at this location?
Blimp (2016-02-10 11:01:28+00:00): Unbekanntes Geldinstitut mitten auf der Straße?
Ana Luisa (2016-02-11 08:02:08+00:00): Hi,

das sieht wirklich seltsam aus. Ich habe den Punkt damals aber nicht gesetzt, sondern nur *str. in *straße geändert, weil bei mehrene Ways und Points nicht konsistent war.
Владимир К (2017-02-14 10:47:00+00:00): а почему на http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202576324#map=16/63.6805/66.7267 вы ставите power=generator?
Stalker61 (2017-02-15 14:26:38+00:00): А перед тем как задать вопрос вы не пробовали посмотреть хотя бы историю?
Владимир К (2017-02-15 14:35:03+00:00): Ой лол. А перед тем как язвить вы не пробовали посмотреть хотя бы историю? Версия два ваша, появляются теги.
trigpoint (2015-10-22 17:26:21+00:00): You office appears to be in the middle of a wood? Is that correct.
All you seem to be doing is promoting your website, if you have a brick and mortar office, which is verifiable with signs, you are welcome to map that but this appears to be simple spam.
jens1o (2018-03-31 21:45:37+00:00): Wieso ist das Murgana als Spaßbad gelabelt? Es hat weder viele Rutschen, noch sonstige Wasserattraktionen. Eine Gastronomie ist(abgesehen von Snackautomaten) ebenfalls nicht vorhanden. Ich bin mir unsicher, ob ein Sprudelbecken sowas rechtfertigt.