piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-11-04 15:32:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
infeeeee (2019-11-06 12:40:14+00:00): Why did you change the opening_hours to Dutch? It should be in English.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76601693
wvdp (2019-11-07 14:58:40+00:00): i was bench editing all the dutch embassies and normally the opening hours need to be updated. but here i was wrong and i've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76764279
infeeeee (2019-11-07 15:04:37+00:00): Thank you!
Alecs01 (2019-11-04 19:23:58+00:00): Ciao,
credo ti abbiano già scritto altri su questo tema, non è in discussione il fatto che ci sia una delibera comunale che chiama così le vie, ma se quella strada è intitolata ad un Ponchielli che di nome si chiama Amilcare, per convenzione si è deciso in OpenStreetMap di usare il nome completo (vale anche per le abbreviazioni). Se ti guardi attorno, lo standard è questo in tutta Italia, non c'è motivo per cui la mappatura di Fino Mornasco debba essere diversa.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
Comasco (2019-11-04 20:17:35+00:00): Ciao,
si da il caso che abito a Fino Mornasco e vorrei vedere i nomi ufficiali delle vie e non quelli che ha deciso qualcun'altro e quindi non sono quelli reali. La delibera comunale prevede l'allineamento con l'Agenzia del Territorio che dovrebbe avere un database nazionale. Pensavo che si mappasse la realtà e non le convenzioni e sinceramente mi sono stufato di dirlo a tutti voi che contestate le denominazioni reali.
dgitto (2019-11-17 15:21:33+00:00): se lo devi ripetere davvero "a tutti noi" forse sei in minoranza?? :-)
comunque questo problema di "ufficialità" contro "realtà/standardOSM/etc" si potrebbe risolvere appunto proprio con l'uso congiunto di name=*  +  official_name=*
dgitto (2019-11-17 15:24:12+00:00): In ogni caso, per dare una occhiata al problema, si potrebbe avere un link veloce a qualcuna di queste delibere?
Comasco (2019-11-17 16:30:17+00:00): http://www.comune.finomornasco.co.it/c013102/files/delibera_stradario_2011.pdf
dgitto (2019-11-17 19:59:24+00:00): Come sospettavo leggo "Via L. Manara", "Via C. Colombo", "Via II Giugno"..
Che si fa? sono questi i nomi da inserire in OSM nel tag "name"? Con le abbreviazioni?
Non solo sono in totale contrasto con lo standard OSM italiano (conquista faticosa), ma anche con le linee guida ISTAT che i comuni dovrebbero adottare.
("VIA DUE GIUGNO", "VIA VENTICINQUE APRILE")
Caro Comasco, con amichevole franchezza affermerei che O questa delibera l'ha scritta un lupo solitario, oppure che dal 2010 le linee guida ISTAT sono variate (qualcuno volenteroso potrebbe controllare).
Io aggiungerei che in OSM l'uniformità (e almeno a livello nazionale) è importante. E' un GIS non una mappa. Per me conta che le ricerche e le query terminino lisce e complete.
Anche io non sono stato favorevole a posizioni che la comunità italiana ha stabilito, ma siamo in un progetto condiviso.
Comasco (2019-11-17 22:50:24+00:00): Beh, adesso hai visto che sono i nomi veri e ufficiali, decisi dall'autorità comunale che ha il potere di farlo. Se ti sembrano sbagliati, dillo al mio sindaco: gli spieghi che devono cambiare l'anagrafe, le carte d'identità, le tessere elettorali e i cartelli delle vie. Se ci riesci sono contento anch'io.
dgitto (2019-11-18 04:51:55+00:00): Per inciso, *devono* cambiare l'anagrafe e i cartelli, le tessere elettorali e le carte di identità, proprio così. Per legge.
Una delibera comunale "ben fatta" la puoi vedere qui http://www.comune.capannoli.pi.it/files/delibera_g.c._n._11-2015.pdf
La nota ISTAT è del 2014, addirittura parla espressamente di g. garibaldi, 2 giugno e forse pure 25 aprile.
Finito l'inciso, a noi non interessa quello che fa il Comune. Questo è OSM. E di queste benedette vie XXV Aprile se ne è parlato fino alla noia. (ed è stata trovata la soluzione)
Cmq mi tengo alla larga da Fino Mornasco (però, hai visto, c'è un tuo compaesano che richiedeva i nomi completi, magari gli rispondi tu)
Ciao
Gh0stz0x (2019-11-18 09:42:46+00:00): Perdonami, è in difetto il comune di Fino Mornasco, l'ISTAT parla chiaro!
Comasco (2019-11-18 20:09:41+00:00): Mi fa piacere sapere delle regole ISTAT. Si impara sempre qualcosa......
Visto che il tema vi sta a cuore, perché non scrivete tutti al sindaco di Fino Mornasco segnalando l'anomalia? Oppure qualcuno scriva da un indirizzo ufficiale OSM così avrà il suo peso?
Gh0stz0x (2019-11-19 07:39:09+00:00): Il  tema ci sta a cuore per questione di qualità dei dati ed uniformità. Non sta a noi far rispettare la legge ai comuni, pertanto le soluzioni ti sono state date segnalandoti il tag  official_name=* pertanto non facciamola diventare lunga. Non è concepibile che servizi terzi e lo stesso OSM con Nominatim si adatti a Fino Mornasco.... Già nominatim fa fatica con le vie italiane, figuriamoci se deve gestire pure i nomi puntati....
Mettiamo i puntati su offical_name=* o meglio ancora su short_name=*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
user_5359 (2019-11-05 18:47:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Some problem like https://www.osm.org/changeset/76640585
eggie (2019-11-04 16:49:53+00:00): Hi.. Please use the present addressnode.
Just beneath.
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-04 18:58:14+00:00): merged info with addressnode
Gresa_Neziri (2019-11-04 19:58:04+00:00): Hi, eggi.  Thanks for the comment and the merging! 
Hugs,
Gresa
eggie (2019-11-04 16:39:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
access=permissive geeft alleen aan dat de wegbeheerder je ten alle tijde de toegang mag ontzeggen.
access=private of customers lijkt me beter. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-04 20:33:56+00:00): Kijk in de wiki eens bij parking:lane=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
curry684 (2019-11-05 09:30:16+00:00): Het gaat om een privaat terrein, met slagboom, waar de beheerder beperkt parkeren van buitenaf toe staat. Private en customers kloppen dus ook niet. Als je idee hebt voor verbetering vanzelfsprekend welkom.

Er klopt overigens van de hele parkeerplaats geen bal dus ik moet er nog een stuk meer van fixen.
eggie (2019-11-05 10:13:36+00:00): Oke .. 
Meestal wordt er dan toch access=customers of private gebruikt. Die tag kan ook op de serviceroad en op de slagboom zelf.
Die zet je op een node  barrier=lift_gate, access=customers
Permissive is in ieder geval fout, want dat heeft een heel andere betekenis in OSM.
Dat routeert gewoon. Denk aan wegen van Rijkswaterstaat (Eigen weg),
wegen over een landgoed.
Een slagboom maakt het niet meer permissive.
Insteek parkeervakken worden niet als parking getagd, maar opgenomen in de weg.
Beetje twijfelgeval hier, want wat doe je dan met de zuidelijke kant. 
Maak er dan één amenity=parking van.
Succes.. up to you,
Eggie
curry684 (2019-11-05 11:07:19+00:00): Denk dat ie nu stuk beter is. Nog lang niet af overigens, ze hebben hier echt idiote dingen gedaan met eenrichtingsverkeer en zo veel mogelijk parkeerplekken per vrije vierkante meter...
eggie (2019-11-05 11:14:27+00:00): Oke. kijk voor evt. wijzigingen niet te veel naar de PDOK 2018 actual want hier is echt alles anders geworden.
Het meest recent is https://satellietdataportaal.nl/  (superview van aug 2019)
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:52:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2019-11-05 09:32:40+00:00): Hi,
could you please explain this import of data? All these objects have only foreign keys that should not appear in the OSM database.

Jan
ndm (2019-11-04 21:19:32+00:00): Looks like a service road to garages - might also access newly built houses - doesn't really seem to be a (private) driveway.
Vinber (2019-11-05 11:48:42+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez ajouté un point et des descriptions mais pas de mots-clés associés.
J'ai modifié en fonction de cette page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station.

Bonne journée
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-25 16:57:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77535627 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duplicated spam in Kyiv following report to DWG.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
scratera (2019-11-04 19:20:42+00:00): in presenza del tag tunnel=yes non è necessario il tag layer=-1 e solo superfluo
ciao paolo
eggie (2019-11-04 16:48:00+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
De info heb ik even overgezet naar de adresnode van het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
Luzandro (2019-11-12 17:46:09+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

du hast einige Radwege angelegt, die "in der Luft hängen" und in einer Sackgasse enden, wie bspw. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6945691133#map=18/47.01638/15.20896

In diesem Fall sieht es laut Mapillary sowieso so aus, als wäre der Radweg eigentlich schon beim Haberneggweg zu Ende, ansonsten musst du Anfang/Ende auch mit der Straße verknüpfen, damit über den Weg geroutet werden kann.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=0LVsvQYaVPnA76ZgDlXFsw&lat=47.01583480453462&lng=15.209317139920813&z=17

LG Andreas
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-25 16:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77535627 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duplicated spam in Kyiv following report to DWG.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
Frans S (2019-11-06 10:55:13+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping
Please map buildings individually, do not cluster buildings and map it as 1 building
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the righthand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degr angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degr corners

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
user_5359 (2019-11-04 21:07:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
pawel66031 (2019-11-04 16:18:11+00:00): *Poprawa szczegółów budynków oraz dodanie chodników.

Mam wątpliwości co do linii 741951730, w sensie nie wiem, czy droga, która idzie pod budynkiem jest dobrze oznaczona.
eggie (2019-11-04 16:41:45+00:00): Gebruik svp de BAG adresnode. Dus niet zelf een adres aanmaken. Dat geeft verwarring.
nr 81 ligt rechts op het gebouw. 
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-04 20:31:30+00:00): merged info with addressnode
curry684 (2019-11-05 09:34:19+00:00): Het hele gebouw is 81, alle nummers tot 67 ernaast bestaan niet, en de 81 staat toevallig alleen bij de hoofdingang.
eggie (2019-11-05 10:05:38+00:00): Precies Curry... daarom lijkt mij één adres voldoende en niet twee vermeldingen. Het bedrijf heb ik nu gecombineerd met de officiële adresnode.
Mochten bepaalde nummers niet (meer) bestaan dan kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster. dan wordt het aangepast.
In import eenrichting; Kadaster>OSM.
Den in dit geval  de verkeerde adresnode gewoon weghalen. De BAG kent alleen 81.
Zie https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=luchthavenweg%2081&resultOffset=0&objectId=0772100000308483&geometry.x=155632.22799573&geometry.y=385241.54599851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0772100000308483
MVG,
Eggie
dval (2019-11-04 16:51:23+00:00): Здесь вы оставили без изменения мост. В результате получается изолят на мосту. Я поправил. Также следует сразу менять дороги в Верх-Исе до границ н.п. от его центра (там 2 штуки таких). Этого я не делал.
mavl (2019-11-05 15:58:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет здание и добавляет на его месте другое. Так не нужно делать. Нужно редактировать существующие объекты, а не удалять и добавлять их снова.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
eggie (2019-11-04 18:18:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Als het goed is bevinden de adresnodes 

zich ïn" de gebouwen als aparte nodes.
Het is allemaal import van het Kadaster. beter om niet de omtrek van de gebouwen aan te passen. alles is ingemeten.


MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-04 18:34:10+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #76608607
NGL-engel (2020-07-05 20:58:29+00:00): Hallo skorpion62
    Du hast den Namen zwar nicht eingetragen, warst aber der letzte Bearbeiter. Dieses Stück Straße heißt "Quakenbrücker Straße" und nicht "Quakenbrücker Landstraße". Kann das richtig sein?
Gruß NGL-engel
skorpion62 (2020-07-06 07:32:16+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
Danke für Dein Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.

Ich hab mal eine Frage zum ID Browser.
Kannst Du in dem ID  die Historie einsehen, z.B. wer wann was bearbeitet/korrigiert hat?
Ich kenne diesen Browser nur vom sehen, hab auch schon mal reingeschaut, für mich ist er aber nicht ausreichend genug zum Arbeiten.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
NGL-engel (2020-07-06 19:20:49+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
   ja, den Verlauf kann man einsehen - allerdings nur sehr mühsam (und ein paar Klicks mehr.)
Gruß
     NGL-engel
skorpion62 (2020-07-07 21:10:22+00:00): Dankeschön
Viele Grüße skorpion62
Glassman (2019-11-04 22:51:56+00:00): Tip: Don't use descriptive names, like Private Driveway. Just tagging it as access=private to keep routers from using it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76603675
user_5359 (2019-11-04 21:33:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 

Hint: switch to Maxar Premium aerial iamges.
bebop4jim (2019-11-05 16:38:06+00:00): unable to switch as suggeste
user_5359 (2019-11-05 16:45:44+00:00): In the id editor (which I rarely use), click the fourth icon on the right. You will get a list of possible aerial images to choose from. This is also described in the help (last icon on the right side).
Jose Luis Infante (2019-11-04 16:57:01+00:00): Hola,
bueno, te has adelantado por unas horas a la apertura oficial...
https://www.fomento.es/el-ministerio/sala-de-prensa/noticias/lun-04112019-1253
Un saludo!
Frans S (2019-11-06 15:06:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please map more accurate. You map buildings a bit oversized and you combine a few buildings to 1 mapped building. Please map each building individual.
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery. And prescribed in the instructions

Best regards
Jose Luis Infante (2019-11-04 17:00:49+00:00): Hola!
Si us plau, fes servir la capa de Catastro per dibuixar els edificis ;) ;)
Salutacions!
mavl (2019-11-05 16:07:51+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
Пожалуйста, никогда не публикуйте на карте персональные данные людей.  
  
В качестве названий тегов используются обычно слова на английском языке:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B
mavl (2019-11-05 16:18:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: personal data.
Noen (2019-11-04 18:37:15+00:00): Flott at du retter veinavn! Riktignok staves allé med høyreaksent og ikke venstreaksent. Du kan kopiere over fra adressene langs veien. Der er det stavet rett.  
Det ser også ut til at du kom i skade for å markere denne veien som enveiskjørt.
TorSS (2019-11-05 12:19:08+00:00): Mange takk for tips! Bårhaugalléen med 2-veis trafikk er rettet opp :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-06 19:26:41+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za poprawienie!
viloan (2019-11-04 17:01:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tordans (2019-11-17 08:47:56+00:00): Hi WoD! Interessehalber: wie handhaben wir das mit den PLZ Boundaries am besten? In diesem CS sieht es so aus, als ob sie mit anderen Objekten verbunden sind. Dann würden sie sich aber auch leichter verschieben bei Änderungen am Objekt (die nicht für die boundary bestimmt waren). Mein Impuls wäre, sie von bestehenden Objekten zu „entkleiden“. Was meinst du? VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76604740
WoD (2019-11-17 11:19:59+00:00): ...ja, das wäre sehr hilfreich, wenn man schnell eine kleine Korrektur vornehmen will und alles mögliche am Objekt klebt, wird die kleine Änderung schnell zum Zeitfresser.
daganzdaanda (2019-11-08 21:52:03+00:00): Hi Datschiburger! Du hast "review_requested" angeklickt, drum hab ich mir das Changeset angeschaut.
 
Nach deiner Beschreibung ist das keine Wand nur für Kinder mehr, oder? Dann könnte man auf jeden Fall "sport=climbing" ergänzen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dclimbing
Dort wird zusätzlich "leisure=sports_centre" vorgeschlagen, weil "sport=*" nie alleine vorkommen sollte.
 
Ist das eine freistehende Wand? dann wärs vielleicht auch eine "barrier=wall". Wenn die Wand die Böschung stützt, wäre es eine "barrier=retaining_wall".

Servus, daganzdaanda
iWowik (2019-11-23 18:11:31+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, вы ставите номера домов, а их обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
Frans S (2019-11-06 15:14:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping

Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and prescribed in the instructions




Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-11 10:28:07+00:00): Can you check the address / location details for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6945824248/history please? The postcode (GU35 9QE) and street (Woolmer Way) tagged on that object are actually located about 8km away at https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.109790&mlon=-0.867069
user_5359 (2019-11-04 21:23:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example).
Frans S (2019-11-07 16:35:12+00:00): Hello Anabel. Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks about your mappings 
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and prescribed in the instructions

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
user_5359 (2019-11-04 21:37:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
damjang (2019-11-04 19:58:22+00:00): Si prega di non cambiare i nomi corretti delle scuole slovene. I nomi erano giusti, quindi changeset revertato.
Mannivu (2019-11-04 20:13:37+00:00): Capisco annullare la modifica (anche se il nome dovrebbe essere in genere solo uno, quello in lingua locale), ma revertare entrance=yes in building=entrance non ha senso oltre che essere un tag errato.
damjang (2019-11-04 20:19:32+00:00): Si, per le entrance hai ragione: corretto
kreuzschnabel (2020-05-11 11:12:59+00:00): Hi Andy, please make sure not to block an existing bridleway for routing applications by adding a barrier without details on its legal access. By default, most barriers are access=no. I added foot=yes, bicycle=yes and horse=yes to the barrier=gate according to the track going through, hoping I’m right.
user_5359 (2019-11-04 21:45:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! We normaly don't paint the outline of a way.