piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheMadCyclist (2020-08-20 20:20:18+00:00): Thank you for picking that up and correcting it. This is a learning experience for me. I'll check the edits.
Warin61 (2020-08-21 03:43:09+00:00): Unfortunately these boundary things are hard in OSM. I get tripped up by them from time to time, why I look for them. 
Don't worry about making errors, as long as your contributing good data your fine.
Cascafico (2020-06-12 10:13:14+00:00): perchè hai rimosso  una scuola ed un asilo?
Cascafico (2020-07-02 09:55:21+00:00): Please, read wiki for leisure=park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86539074
KarmaCleaner (2020-07-06 11:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87598797 where the changeset comment is: revert arbitrary edits
TheBestIdea (2020-07-28 20:27:13+00:00): Hey nyuriks,

Is this portion of Grove St still two-way for bike in the protected bike lane?

Thanks!
nyuriks (2020-07-28 21:51:34+00:00): Yes, the just blocked the southbond car traffic portion for restaurants, but left the bike lane both ways (bike lane is a separate two way lane as oppose to an extra lane on each side of the road)
TheBestIdea (2020-07-29 00:07:15+00:00): Cool. Thanks for letting me know!
I will add "oneway:bicycle=no" to those blocks. (It might be redundant with "cycleway:right:oneway=no", but you need for former to get OpenCycleMap to render it as 2-way for bikes so other data users might also need it to be able to route bikes in both ways.)
-Brandon
chachafish (2020-06-12 20:31:19+00:00): Hello :) Thank you for your additions to OSM. The road you added here is inside an active construction zone. If you use the latest imagery (Maxar) you'll see this road and the gates you added do not exist. Thanks :)
jedidy (2020-06-15 03:49:50+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the incorrect edit, . I've made the necessary changes under changeset #86638861. Will ensure not to repeat such errors again. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
jedidy
chachafish (2020-06-15 18:00:43+00:00): Thank you :)
Cascafico (2020-06-14 20:49:39+00:00): You covered with grass, several elements: orchad, church and buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86539281
KarmaCleaner (2020-07-06 11:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87598797 where the changeset comment is: revert arbitrary edits
karson_ (2020-06-12 13:39:12+00:00): What was the point of deleting all the features on the golf course? 

They seem to have already been mapped with relatively high quality. I am assuming you are going to remap the course slightly more accurately. Why not adjust the current data to be more accurate. By deleting everything, the associated edit history is lost.
grant977 (2020-06-12 13:44:22+00:00): I am redrawing the entire course to more detail to import it into the Golf Club game.
mariotomo (2020-12-05 16:27:35+00:00): Hola Alvarado.  cuál aviso te dio JOSM al enviar estos datos a la base de datos?  aquí parece que hayas puesto dos líneas sobrepuestas.  lo quieres revisar tú mismo?
mariotomo (2020-11-03 15:01:40+00:00): porque bajaste la población de Santiago?  mencionas como fuente "Bing", que son fotos aéreas.  por favor hablemos en el grupo, no está bien seguir editando sin tener en cuenta de la opinión de los demás.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:02:31+00:00): Saludos, Mario recuerda que en el grupo solicitaste publicar datos oficiales, el ultimo censo en Santiago oficial fue en el 2010, son tus propias reglas puesta en el grupo, no voy a inventar  ni a publicar estudios de impacto de densidad de población por que alguien cree que deben ser así. Yo esperare el próximo censo de la república de Panamá, yo me atrevo a decir que no sobrepasa los 50000 habitantes.
Frans S (2020-06-17 08:33:45+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings of streams are a bit weird
Existing mapped streams have you modified to a tunnel and a culvert  (3.4 km) 
Please check the correct tagging of waterways
See this wiki how to tag them correctly
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2020-06-12 11:44:39+00:00): You can proudly add it is a police quarters if it is so, but is it? No need to change its name.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86540760
mueschel (2020-06-12 16:26:11+00:00): Hi,
please explain what all these ways and their tags represent.
They have many foreign tags that should not appear in OSM, e.g.
gid=2786
parent_nam=Serbithang Lam
pry_name=Serbithang Lam 2
traffic_co=2
type=child
If this is an import from some external source, please read and follow our Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mariotomo (2020-11-03 15:22:47+00:00): Santiago de Veraguas es el nombre oficial, la etiqueta es official_name.  te lo voy a mejorar.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:12:54+00:00): Saludos, te recomiendo usar Old_name, ya que Santiago de Veraguas colonia española, fue solo hasta 1821, Panamá en ese años se unió Colombia y aunque no creas muchas cosas cambiaron, como el nombre de la capital de Veraguas (provincia), para 1821 lo que hoy es Chiriquí, Bocas del Toro y C. Ngobe Bugle, ellas 3 junto a lo que es hoy Veraguas conformaban una sola provincia, históricamente años después se crearon políticamente hasta nuestra fecha. su capital Santiago, nombre oficial, cualquier panameño sabe eso, en la escuela no los enseñas.

Te voy a dar otro ejemplo sabes como se llamaba Alanje cuando fue colonia española, "Santiago de Alanje", paso lo miso con Santiago de Alanje  como  Santiago de Veraguas. Historia amigo  Mario, es un nombre histórico no oficial, gracias.
Kolo_0 (2020-06-12 05:07:53+00:00): Hej, bo widzę, że jakieś granice pozmieniałem, to jest do wywalenia, natomiast linia 2 leci dobrze po edycji.
Kolo_0 (2020-06-12 05:17:39+00:00): Albo wszystko jest ok, po prostu pociąłem linie na potrzeby dostosowania autobusu
zuicz (2020-06-12 08:43:10+00:00): Pewnie rozdzieliłeś jakąś ulicę na dwie na potrzeby zmiany trasy, a do ulicy przyczepiona jest granica, zatem automatycznie podzieliłeś granicę na dwie. To nie jest błąd ;)
Kolo_0 (2020-06-12 11:55:50+00:00): Właśnie tak zrobiłem, widzę, że jest dobrze. 
Czekam, aż zmiany będą wprowadzone.
mariotomo (2020-11-03 19:51:31+00:00): Alvarado, a propósito de "Peces" te comenté en el conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63993350.
no me contestaste, y volviste a editar, sin solucionar mi duda: no veo ningún "Peces" ahí donde está el punto.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:33:29+00:00): Peces comunidad del corregimiento de San Lorenzo, déjame revisar pero creo que lo edite, bien.
abakus_uploader (2020-06-12 22:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Saeed SJ (2020-06-27 05:08:15+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
طبق گزارشات کاربران ما این 3 دوربرگردان کلا بسته شده. لطفا مجددا این دوربرگردان ها را رسم نفرمایید.
با تشکر
hypermee (2020-06-30 00:52:53+00:00): Thank you for removing them, I will not add them again.

با تشکر از شما برای حذف آنها ، من دیگر آنها را اضافه نمی کنم.
user_5359 (2020-06-12 16:40:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
chachafish (2020-06-12 20:18:05+00:00): Howdy :) I don't know if you've had the chance to read the wiki page for the Key:is_in, but I think this tag is mostly not added these days. It still exists, but I don't think it's used much. As the wiki says, "The is_in tag pre-dates boundary polygons. When a region has a well developed set of boundary polygons the information that could be placed in the is_in tag on an object can usually be derived from the boundaries that contain it, in which case the information in the tag seems redundant." I'm not saying it's "wrong" to use it, but I think it's redundant these days since the boundaries of Colorado are well established. Cheers :)
chachafish (2020-06-12 20:18:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in
Luis Garcia-Lopez (2020-06-17 18:16:56+00:00): Hi Chacha, I was able to read the wiki and I have removed the "is_in" tag. Thanks for letting me know of this.
chachafish (2020-06-17 18:31:51+00:00): No probs. OSM is so complicated. Cheers ;)
vasony (2020-06-13 11:40:49+00:00): Szia!

Strázsa út átnevezése:

A fenti számú határozat nálam lévő példányában nem szerepel a Strázsa utca. (30017 hrsz). Mi a forrás, illetve honnan elérhető?

Tamás
JodaStephen (2020-06-12 07:17:55+00:00): Not sure about this one. Bishopsford Road is closed at the bridge, so right turn is the only thing that makes sense.
OlegKukharchik (2020-06-12 08:22:28+00:00): Hello  JodaStephen! Good point, but I was guided by the marking on satellite imagery (Esri) - left arrow only and drivers feedback. In such case, if you want to drive along Bishopsford Road to south-west - you can make a U-turn on the gas station. I think there are no doubts.
OlegKukharchik (2020-06-12 09:40:35+00:00): JodaStephen, we've revied our data once again and it looks like I made a hasty conclusion on this turn restriction. There is no "left turn only" markings on the road at ESRI imagery, I confused YIELD marking with an arrow.
I'm going to revert my edit now.
JodaStephen, thanks for reaching out so quickly, we are very grateful for your help!
eggie (2020-06-12 08:26:51+00:00): Dag WJ Winter,

Je kunt natuurlijk wel clubs  toevoegen op een evt. clubhuis (adresnode)
club=sport
sport=ice_skating
name=  .......clubnaam
renderen doet het (nog) niet op de kaart.
JOSM is "de editor" aanbevolen.
(java nodig) 
Die moet je wel eerst installeren en als je 'm wilt starten vanuit www.openstreetmap.org moet je ook nog een instelling aanpassen. 

Je kunt wel josm apart opstarten via een icoon. Zo doe ik het meestal. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710  

Josm dus aanbevolen. 
Veel plezier met mappen. 
Gr Eggie
mueschel (2020-06-12 16:24:22+00:00): Hi,
please explain what all these points represent.
They have many foreign tags that should not appear in OSM, e.g.
bldg_num 	26
gid 	5249
id 	5264
id_0 	5249
id_1 	5249
pry_no 	20
street_pry 	Gochukha Lam 8

If this is an import from some external source, please read and follow our Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-29 07:58:04+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1480240 ?
dval (2020-06-12 08:23:34+00:00): Здесь вы нарисовали мостик. Но наложили его на уже существующий путь. Делать надо иначе: разрезать существующий путь на три участка: до моста, мост, после моста, и на отрезок моста добавить bridge=yes + layer=1 в дополнение к другим тегам, то обозначает, что мост над остальной поверхностью. В JOSM'e разрез линии осуществляется по латинской P (shift+p) с предварительным выделением точек, где надо разрезать (не соображу сразу, нужен ли для P плагин).
user_5359 (2020-06-15 15:05:42+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
bldg_num	1A
gid	5051
id	5064
id_0	5051
id_1	5051
pry_no	52
sec_no	34
street_pry	Bapi Lam
street_sec	Gochukha Gom
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
wermak (2023-06-18 10:04:49+00:00): Hallo som-tam, 
zu den von Dir hier eingetragenen 30km/h gibt es einen Hinweis, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732016.
Schöne Grüße
wermak (2023-07-20 12:44:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61607000/history
dval (2020-06-12 07:53:13+00:00): Hi, Mr_Grinie! Здесь у вас на дорожке сразу и футвэй и path. Вместе их не следует. Если строго пешеходная, то highway=footway; если не только пешеходная, но не для 4-х колесных, то лучше highway=path. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dfootway. Далее, на дороги не стоит навешивать name=, лучше в description=, поскольку некоторые валидаторы начинают ругаться, что дорога с названием, но менее важная, чем unclassified. Это неудобство, но лучше с названиями повременить.
user_5359 (2020-06-12 16:17:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
MFlamm (2020-06-24 21:11:33+00:00): Bonjour, 
Ce groupe de modifications comporte de nombreux problèmes:
1) Les voies piétonnes modifiées n'ont en grande majorité pas de dérogation pour être utilisées à vélo. Il est donc inadéquat d'ajouter le tag bicycle=yes.
2) Sur des voies piétonnes (footway ou pedestrian), il est totalement superflu d'ajouter le tag foot=yes puisque c'est une valeur implicite. Merci de limiter les ajouts aux seuls tags qui apportent une plus-value informative.
3) Aucune source n'est mentionnée pour expliquer sur quelle base les ajouts de tags se sont fondés: concrètement, s'agit-il de connaissances personnelles du terrain ou d'autres sources?
Enfin, pour information, les données OSM sont utilisées par de nombreux systèmes de cartographie et de navigation dédiés pour les cyclistes. En introduisant des valeurs inadéquates, la qualité de ces systèmes s'en trouvera dégradée. Pour plus d'infos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Cordialement, Michael
LudovicG (2025-08-01 17:00:06+00:00): Hum ... je suis surpris, il y a méprise sur le bon manoir (Plessis <> Carmerie). Surtout que vous semblez vous-même avoir touché au "bon manoir" un peu plus au nord : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75473113
Ou je me trompe ? Dites-moi.
Alban37 (2025-08-05 05:51:14+00:00): Bonjour, en regardant sur les maps IGN ce sont les bonnes appellations et sur Google aussi. Je ne vois pas d’inversion. Tu pourrais m’en dire un peu plus?
hayes9 (2020-07-13 20:43:54+00:00): Hello Pt873! I would like to discuss the data in Sao Luis since we appear to be editing the same roads. I noticed here (https://osmcha.org/changesets/86551221/) you changed a couple highways at intersections from typical highway classifications to highway links. Also, I noticed you have been adding additional ways at intersections (https://osmcha.org/changesets/80238516/ & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767783534) which are not too common elsewhere. Are there specific local policies that you are referencing for these changes? Thanks!
Automatic translation below: 
Olá Pt873! Eu gostaria de discutir os dados em São Luis, pois parece que estamos editando as mesmas estradas. Notei aqui (https://osmcha.org/changesets/86551221/) que você mudou algumas rodovias nos cruzamentos das classificações típicas de rodovias para os links das rodovias. Além disso, notei que você adicionou maneiras adicionais nos cruzamentos (https://osmcha.org/changesets/80238516/ & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767783534)que não são muito comuns em outros lugares. Existem políticas locais específicas que você está referenciando para essas alterações? Obrigado!
Pt873 (2020-07-13 22:38:01+00:00): Olá! Nas últimas semanas tenho feito diversas atualizações nas vias da cidade, especialmente em pontos onde havia identificado erros anteriormente. Moro em São Luís e as alterações que fiz foi com base na atual disposição e sinalização das vias. Se houver algo errado ou incoerente, você poderia especificar? Faço questão de corrigir o que estiver equivocado.
hayes9 (2020-07-16 00:05:57+00:00): I noticed here (https://osmcha.org/changesets/86551221/, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777901314) you changed a couple highways at intersections from typical highway classifications to highway links. According to the policy for highway links (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#At-grade_intersections) these should not be links, but rather their normal classification. Is there a reason why link is preferred? Thanks.

Automatic translation below:
Notei aqui (https://osmcha.org/changesets/86551221/, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777901314) que você mudou algumas rodovias nos cruzamentos das classificações típicas de rodovias para os links de rodovias. De acordo com a política para links de rodovias (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#At-grade_intersections), estes não devem ser links, mas sua classificação normal. Existe uma razão pela qual o link é preferido? Obrigado.
Pt873 (2020-07-16 01:49:30+00:00): Certo. Me lembro que quando comecei a editar por aqui, percebi que haviam casos em que se usou o link e casos em que se usou a classificação normal. Como eu não sabia se havia um padrão a ser seguido, julguei que seria melhor utilizar os links, pois interpretei que, por se tratarem de ligações curtas no meio-fio das avenidas utilizadas exclusivamente para cruzamentos e retornos, seria mais adequado. Devo desconsiderar isso?
hayes9 (2020-07-17 20:57:30+00:00): I would not entirely disregard that thought because the usage for u-turns (“retornos”) is correct. My understanding of the OSM wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) is a highway link should be used for ramps, separated turn lanes, and u-turns. However, if the u-turn is additionally a crossing surface street, then use the standard highway classification (as suggested in the last paragraph here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#At-grade_intersections)
Automatic Translation below:
Eu não desconsideraria completamente esse pensamento, porque o uso de inversões de marcha (“retornos”) está correto. Meu entendimento das diretrizes wiki do OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) é um link de rodovia que deve ser usado para rampas, faixas de curva separadas e inversões de marcha. No entanto, se a inversão de marcha for adicionalmente uma rua de superfície de cruzamento, use a classificação de rodovia padrão (conforme sugerido no último parágrafo aqui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#At-grade_intersections)
Pt873 (2020-07-17 23:50:26+00:00): Tudo bem, entendi. Sendo assim, passarei a editar dessa maneira. Obrigado pelo esclarecimento!
hayes9 (2020-07-20 17:26:39+00:00): De Nada!
dval (2020-06-12 08:35:28+00:00): Здесь вы нарисовали track, но, видимо, не заметили то, что ранее был нарисован service. В результате получилось пересечение двух дорог, которые по сути есть одна и та же дорога. Думаю, свою лучше удалить и поправить, если надо ту, которая уже была.
dval (2020-06-12 08:36:34+00:00): Удалить, имею ввиду, совпадающий участок. Тот участок, которого не было, конечно, оставить.
aceman444 (2020-10-09 23:03:17+00:00): Dobry den, prosim piste zmysluplnejsie komentare sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . "Doplnene" nikomu nepomoze.
user_5359 (2020-06-13 11:06:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
dvdhoven (2020-06-13 06:57:05+00:00): Hallo Gatalin,

Ik ben 2 jaar geleden al begonnen met het Hilligenpad bij het startpunt in Zenderen.
Zie ook https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8050627
Kun je beide delen samenvoegen? 
En hhier het overzicht vanhet hele pad: https://www.landschapoverijssel.nl/routes/hilligenpad-bezinningsroute

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Gatalin (2020-06-15 17:58:43+00:00): Dag Dick,
Ik had blijkbaar niet goed genoeg gekeken, maar nu zijn ze samengevoegd!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Fred
aharvey (2020-08-16 01:24:00+00:00): see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
aharvey (2020-08-16 01:20:53+00:00): hi please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
johantiden (2020-08-12 16:55:39+00:00): Maybe just remove the node?
flohoff (2020-06-12 10:06:18+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier gerade eben diese änderung entdeckt weil meine Routenüberwachung gemault hat.

Gibts dazu eine Pressemitteilung Straßen NRWs? Das macht immer Sinn sowas als Note auf den betroffenen Wegen zu verlinken.

Ich konnte gerade nichts aktuelles finden bei denen.

Flo
flohoff (2020-06-12 10:10:51+00:00): Ich habe was auf Verkehr NRW gefunden - allerdings nichts verlinkbares. Ich hab hab mal hier den Note aufgemacht um das zu tracken:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2226304
user_5359 (2020-06-12 16:20:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mappinglander (2021-02-19 11:17:42+00:00): Hello,
I've recently noticed your edits. Please, do not use highway=bridge instead of highway=(road type) + bridge=yes +
layer=1 ,because it's invalid.
trigpoint (2020-06-12 12:39:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit, however I have a couple of concerns.

Firstly I can find no evidence that Mountsorrel station is called anything other than Mountsorrel. I am puzzled as to why you have added Bond Lane to it. If that is an address then it should be in the addr:street field.
Also please be careful when moving between areas that are far apart. Whilst yo made no real change to the Southwold Railway the editor still created a large bounding box. In these cases it is better to exit from the editor.

Cheers Phil
tanonin (2021-11-21 18:49:57+00:00): /way/815213897:
landuse=farmyard seems to be more appropriate
klnkengi (2020-06-14 21:24:07+00:00): Building=commercial passt nur an Gebäude, aber nicht an einen POI-Punkt. Hier wäre vielleicht shop=yes, office=yes oder office=insurance passender.
abakus_uploader (2020-06-12 22:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
RicoElectrico (2020-06-12 09:51:37+00:00): Hej, powinno się raczej te adresy osobno zmapować. Jako punkty w obrysie budynku, lub jeśli dom to "bliźniak" - na każdej z części inny. Widzę, że są one odpowiednio osobno oznaczone w urzędowej ewidencji ( polska.e-mapa.net ) i wiadomo więc w jakiej kolejności je wstawić.
Krzysztof Adamski (2020-06-12 21:54:28+00:00): Racja. Na razie chciałem zrobić żeby główne numery się zgadzały (bo były przesunięte o 2). Rozdzielenie na dwa osobne adresy zrobię niedługo ja albo maro21.