piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mhrana98 (2019-08-17 10:21:14+00:00): You are doing an awesome job in osm. But here you applied multipolygon  in a rail road with another road.
 "The multipolygon relation is used to represent complex areas. Relations of type multipolygon are used to represent complex areas. Simple areas are mapped in OSM by creating a closed way and tagging it with something that suggests an area rather than a line."
here you can find out more (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon)
thanks
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-08-17 16:23:07+00:00): দুঃখিত তবে আপনি কোনটির কথা বলছেন? রাস্তা নং জানালে সুবিধা হত বের করতে?
mhrana98 (2019-10-29 04:12:52+00:00): ঢাকা - কলকাতা রেল লাইন
mapman44 (2019-05-24 14:11:06+00:00): Thanks for your edits in Grants Pass. It's good editing practice to use the full name of places and make sure they are correctly spelled. For example, "Tap Rock" is actually one word and the full name is "Taprock Northwest Grill." And "Hellgate" (which could be misunderstood by some users) is actually  "Hellgate Jetboat Excursions." I encourage you to fix the edits you made. It will help make a more complete and accurate map for all. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70533692
Palolo (2019-05-24 18:15:05+00:00): Thanks for the note, as you can see from the history I was cleaning up some of the tagging, while maintaining the names as originally contributed rather than deleting and replacing.
mapman44 (2019-05-24 20:13:58+00:00): OK, I'll fix them.
Palolo (2019-05-24 20:22:40+00:00): Thanks
Mark R Naird (2020-05-09 14:55:16+00:00): What's the source for the address nodes?
recrayon (2025-03-09 03:18:43+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163385708
ralley (2019-05-23 19:11:07+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  A couple of questions: which router were you using that needed this way added to avoid routine through backyards?  You've added a path but from the aerial imagery it looks like you've mapped the footpaths and a driveway as a single way?   The way you have added appears to be unconnected from any other ways and so will not be used by routers anyway.
freebeer (2019-05-23 07:12:42+00:00): are you sure about this?  no aerial imagery shows any building, as this straddles the riverbanks across the river and in the Clarity imagery looks like a pile-up of logs, and in the bing imagery you used is just an overhanging tree.

please only add things that really exist to the map, and as this spot is not reachable by auto, it is hard to believe it is as described.
elotrojames (2019-06-02 17:44:29+00:00): Hola. en este conjunto de cambios se agrega un basurero, entre las etiquetas se utiliza "collection_times" pero el valor asociado no sigue la sintaxis indicada en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:collection_times
Kazimír Bořivoj Havlíček-Kašpar (2019-05-23 02:53:30+00:00): sory I just clickt wrong buton, this my fried nhouse
freebeer (2019-05-23 06:41:35+00:00): Cześć!

please do not add any personal information to osm, as you have in the name field.

also, the name should be an actual name and not a description.  Here there should be no name.

this applies to your nearby additions as well, `My house path'.

and also, the value you have given for elevation is wrong, as it should be a number in metres above sea level if known.

three metres height seems far too small for this type of house.

the shape of the house is poor as well; aerial imagery shows it should be a rectangle, the ESRI Clarity layer is best for this despite it being about a decade old now.

otherwise, thanks for adding to osm
freebeer (2019-05-23 07:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70540078 where the changeset comment is: this is clearly fantasy mapping based on the tags, and from aerial imageries it is obviously just part of the adjoining lake depending on water level.  deleted, please only map what really exists.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-23 07:05:29+00:00): Hi bradypett, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70535845

#GolfMapping

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
bradypett (2019-05-23 10:41:45+00:00): Yes, my apologizes. I’m in the process of updating the entire course to be more accurate. In the future I will not delete but will just edit the existing objects.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-23 11:01:11+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
#HappyMapping
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-23 07:08:08+00:00): Hi bradypett, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped fairways, which are visible in the utilized satellite imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70536508

#GolfMapping

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
bradypett (2019-05-23 10:40:32+00:00): I’m in the process of updating the fairways/entire course to be more accurate. In the future I will not delete but will just edit the existing objects.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-23 11:00:58+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
#HappyMapping
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-23 05:07:25+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Mike Baggaley (2019-09-16 22:39:51+00:00): Hi, this change disallows pedestrian access. Should it have motor_vehicle=no or vehicle=no rather than access=no?

Cheers,
Mike
MKnight (2019-05-23 09:07:11+00:00): Moin,Dein Navi scheint nicht OSM-basiert zu sein, da an der Stelle bisher gar kein maxspeed gesetzt war.
Welches Navi nutzt Du?

Da Du ein review angefragt hast: sieht gut aus.
Mic-Ro (2019-05-23 16:43:23+00:00): Danke für Dein Feedback
Garmin mit lebensl. Update und VW
MKnight (2019-05-23 16:54:11+00:00): Wenn Du Deine Änderungen im Navi haben möchtest, müsstest Du auf OSM-Material umsteigen.

Weiss nicht wie aktuell das ist: malenki.ch/OSM/papier_und_poster/garmin_kostenlos.pdf ansonsten den Links dort folgen.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-23 09:34:46+00:00): Hi anont, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 80 buildings, which are visible in the satellite imagery and have been mapped yesterday? Thanks.

More information about this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70537158

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
freebeer (2019-05-29 20:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70747918 where the changeset comment is: restore visible standard layer buildings after no mapper response or explanation
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ndm (2019-05-23 21:46:43+00:00): Better to just add access no? Maybe demote to path?
letsridebikes (2019-05-28 12:51:08+00:00): It's a steel gate in a tall fence which is now permanently locked, so I am not sure on the best representation of ground truth. The paths within the site are already access=private so do you think access=no is a clear enough indication? It doesn't render any differently (I know we shouldn't tag for the renderer but it does impact usability)
ndm (2019-05-28 21:45:59+00:00): No it was deleting the way I wondered about -- I often use the presence of even inaccessible paths as useful routing info.
letsridebikes (2019-05-28 21:53:14+00:00): Fair point, I'll reinstate the way segment with access=no. Thanks for the help!
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
skquinn (2019-05-27 08:06:44+00:00): This may have been better fixed by making the service road one way, thus making turn restrictions unnecessary. I am not out this way often but I will try to survey to confirm it's one way if I am.
jguthula (2019-05-27 08:44:16+00:00): Hey skquinn,

Thanks for looking into this edit. In NA we saw couple of cases where there will be a do-not-enter sign board but in reality the way is actually not a oneway. To avoid confusion my team decided to:

1. Add oneway if there is a do-not-enter board supported by a oneway board or 
2. Add turn restrictions when there is only a do-not-enter board. 

This is to make sure only accurate information flows to OSM from our end. If you believe our assumption is not accurate do let us know. We are actively looking forward to work along with the community and learn more from them. 

Regards,
Jothirnadh
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-23 15:05:35+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
contrapunctus (2019-10-06 00:56:33+00:00): Hi Mayank! :)

It seems you've created a second carriageway for Vikas Marg in this changeset. I happened to pass the spot today, and noticed that it was single carriageway. Aerial imagery (I checked Bing and Mapbox Satellite) confirms this.

Since this changeset touches quite a few roads, I cannot revert it - I will have to remove the carriageway manually.

Please do not add carriageways where none exist. And kindly consider making smaller changesets, with more descriptive comments - they make life easier for your fellow mappers ;)
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2019-05-23 06:53:18+00:00): Hallo Niko, willkommen bei OSM in Rostock :-)

Bitte beachte, dass das Thema ÖPNV echt nicht einfach ist und einige Einarbeitung erfordert: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport
Bitte beachte das insbesondere beim Löschen von Objekten, dass diese auch wieder in den passenden Routen-Relationen landen usw.

Happy mapping!
eiger (2019-05-23 10:00:47+00:00): Salut,
Il y a erreur sur le code postal des nœuds adresses. Le code postal de Rouffach est 68250. Le code que tu as utilisé est le code INSEE de la commune.
smallint68 (2019-06-04 08:19:48+00:00): Salut merci
Désolé ce n'était pas mon jour j'ai corrigé d'autres que j'avais également inversé...
a+
mapman44 (2019-05-24 14:01:05+00:00): Hi Dariaa_P, thanks for your OSM edits. Just a suggestion - avoid having area shapes go to the middle of the street and "glue" (attach) to the street way itself. If later edits are made to the street the editor must "unglue" the two before making edits.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-23 15:05:31+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mosstreet (2019-05-23 09:29:18+00:00): Евгений перестаньте шарахаться от снимка к снимку, вы то наносите то удаляете объекты, если нет понимания, то зачем вы вводите в заблуждение всех? Определите самую свежую подложку и по ней редактируйте. Если вы делаете коррекцию по месту, то сообщайте об этом. Желательно с фото, а то надоело за вами править.
Horza (2019-05-23 14:44:03+00:00): Why do you include St Mary's Seafood and More in Old St Agustine Plaza instead of Mcdonalds? As far as I can tell from https://www.regencycenters.com/property/detail/134/OldStAugustinePlaza
And
http://maps.coj.net/DuvalProperty/#
it should be the other way around. Is there another source you have I am unaware of?
user_5359 (2019-05-26 06:50:22+00:00): Hallo! Du verwendest das ungewöhnliche Schlüssel Volumen bei zwei Hydranten. Bitte liest Dir die Wikiseite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant durch. Meinst Du eventuell den Schlüssel flow_rate?
Sosha1996 (2019-09-12 12:26:53+00:00): از زحمتی که کشیدید ممنونم اما رسماتون پر ایراد و بی‌دقت بوده.
araash (2019-09-14 03:42:41+00:00): سلام.ممنون میشم مثال بزنید کجا ایراد داشته
Sosha1996 (2019-09-14 14:08:29+00:00): تقریبا غالب معابری که رسم کرده بودید ایراد داشت
Sosha1996 (2019-09-14 14:09:22+00:00): معابر از روی ساختمون رد شده بودن. این شکل رسم بی‌دقت‌گونه، رسم مفیدی نیست.
eggie (2019-05-23 08:28:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Adresgegevens bevinden zich al op de adresnodes. Het is niet nodig om nog een keer het adres toe te voegen aan het gebouw zelf.

Je bijdragen worden teruggedraaid. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-23 08:31:38+00:00): reverted by changeset  #70542587
eggie (2019-05-23 09:11:14+00:00): Groothandelsmarkt 1 bestaat niet in het kadaster.
Je kunt dit het beste doorgeven aan het kadaster zelf. De import is éénrichting naar OSM vanuit het Kadaster. 
Je had het adres ingevuld op een gebouw aan Marktplein 4
Je kunt een terugmelding doen door op het potloodje te klikken. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=groothandelsmarkt%201&resultOffset=0&objectId=0459100000006194&geometry.x=139087.45000427&geometry.y=524311.88299851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0459010000002411
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-23 09:23:35+00:00): Adressen Bobeldijk en Nieuwstraat lagen van hun plaats. Nu liggen ze op de juiste gebouwen.
Gr eggie
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-23 15:05:21+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
kadecc (2019-05-24 06:49:44+00:00): heb bron niet weergegeven.
in het CRAB zitten alle officiële straatnamen van Vlaanderen:
https://www.geopunt.be/kaart?viewer_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaps.geopunt.be%2Fresources%2Fapps%2FGeopunt-kaart_app%2Findex.html%3Fid%3D8ab210f66a7b26ba016ae89991b10214
olehz (2019-05-23 10:14:00+00:00): відкатувати твої зміни? чи сам повернеш як було по GPS?
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
olehz (2019-05-23 10:12:07+00:00): от навіщо в черговий раз рухати цю дорогу? все ж було ідеально вирівняно по GPS треках. знімки мають похибку!!!
eggie (2020-12-25 16:47:26+00:00): Nu aan het mappen in Nederland daarom alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Phyks (2019-05-23 09:17:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est étrange d'avoir des capacités impaires sur des points de stationnements vélo. La capacité à indiquer est en nombre de vélos normalement (et on peut en général mettre deux vélos par arceau).

Est-ce bien des capacités impaires ici ?

Merci,
Bonne journée,
mavl (2019-11-08 18:29:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-11-08 18:29:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Jakka (2019-05-24 07:09:23+00:00): een iets betere omschrijving https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Dsports_hall
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
lmagreault (2019-05-27 16:41:14+00:00): Bonjour,
loc_name plutôt que alt_name ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70543448
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
SomeoneElse (2019-05-23 10:17:27+00:00): As previously mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2738 and at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9334819 - please don't change industrial areas to large areas of park (or grassland).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624178823 is clearly NOT grassland - it has industrial buildings on it.  If you'd like to micro-map the individual areas as landuse=grass please do so, but don't change the whole area (including the buildings).
Q10osm (2019-05-24 05:59:08+00:00): already did so much mirco mapping its really just office , really do not understand where the industrial thingy came about
Q10osm (2019-05-24 06:01:22+00:00): its really annoying when effort to do so much  and people just group the whole area under their own classification.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-24 11:00:18+00:00): @Q10osm well if they're commercial buildings set "landuse=commercial", not "natural=grassland" which is what you set them to.  In commercial buildings you might see people working in offices, on a natural=grassland you might see herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the Serengeti.  The two are not the same.
eggie (2019-05-23 09:32:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-05-23 09:35:51+00:00): Dag Guido,

Je kunt die baan wellicht beter taggen als leisure=pitch met een extra tag sport=klootschieten
eggie (2019-05-23 09:37:36+00:00): meadow  is meer een gebied voor begrazing. 
Gr Eggie
Guido_Beerten (2019-05-23 10:16:28+00:00): Ik heb het gevonden. O.K.
eggie (2019-05-23 09:29:36+00:00): Oke.. now you may remove the ford from the middle of the bridge and dsiconnect the bridge from the ditch.
Your edit...
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70543786

Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-05-23 10:59:56+00:00): cyclepath (or path maybe?)  connected tot main=cycleway Churchilllaan. Disconnected from ditch and reshaped according BGT omtrekgericht.
Gr eggie
Jakka (2019-05-24 07:21:38+00:00): Bib midden een groen zone ?
Polder van Maldegem (2019-05-25 05:44:53+00:00): Bib hoort bij adres Stee 3.
Jakka (2019-05-25 10:04:58+00:00): toegevoegd. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6499451279
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
maraf24 (2019-05-31 07:23:05+00:00): Proszę o nieużywanie funkcji automatycznych napraw w iD.
Ta funkcja działa nieprawidłowo!
乌克兰移民 (2019-05-24 15:35:43+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/15BG9ocoOIkxlX5nON8fGrJ-DOKrEUd6P/view?usp=sharing
literan (2019-05-23 18:41:21+00:00): there is no trunk traffik on this link (from primary to trunk).  Reverting
literan (2019-05-23 18:43:15+00:00): we have agreement here in Russia on road status, please read before editing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Leosi (2019-05-23 20:40:58+00:00): I understood
PT-53 (2019-05-23 11:01:19+00:00): Hallo mindofahitchhiker,
was hat ein Wehr mit dem Millitär zu tun? Ich denke nichts.
Ein Wehr kann man mit waterway=weir eintragen (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway%3Dweir)
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
mindofahitchhiker (2019-05-23 11:39:34+00:00): Hi, I checked it and used the proper tag. Erklärende Grüße ;)
PT-53 (2019-05-23 10:57:54+00:00): Hallo mindofahitchhiker,
"Kayak/Canoe Umtragestelle/Portage" ist kein Eigenname (siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name) sondern eine Beschreibung, die man unter description eintragen kann.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
lyctkel (2022-06-27 13:46:21+00:00): Hi Mimosin,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691929978 which uses building=temporary.
This tag is not often use and discouraged (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:temporary)
From my point of view building=yes or building=retail  would fit better if you add seasonal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal) or just keep the opening houres.
Regards,
lyctkel
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ndm (2019-05-23 22:59:44+00:00): Not a good idea to draw roads through buildings.
kmarjbh (2019-07-02 13:11:29+00:00): Hi ndm,
Thanks for reviewing the edit, the roads were added as per bing aerial imagery. Thanks for changing the alignment of the road segments drawn in this change set.
Please let us know if there are any suggestions.
Regards,
kmarjbh.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:58:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
☆Finvenkulo (2019-05-29 22:01:19+00:00): Jaki jest cel dodawania znaczników "brand:wikipedia" zawierających odnośniki do Wikipedii we wrogich i obraźliwych językach (angielski i inne)?!
Proszę natychmiast przestać!
maraf24 (2019-05-31 07:12:32+00:00): To jest automatyczny fix robiony przez iD, zainicjowany przez użytkownika.
Takie działania są niedozwolone, tutaj dodatkowo usunięte zostały informacje z przejść dla pieszych.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:58:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ndm (2019-05-23 22:57:52+00:00): Demoted to service and driveway
kmarjbh (2019-07-02 13:21:06+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. We added residential based on the surrounding segments which looks like a residential community. But here adding service is correct as per the OS Data. OS data was not considered when this edit was made. Going forward we will use this resource and make changes. 
Please let us know if there are any suggestions.
Regards, 
kmarjbh
abakus_uploader (2019-05-23 22:35:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2019-05-23 10:37:42+00:00): Mooi Guido,
Tip: De club zelf kun je op de adresnode van het clubhuis kwijt met leisure=sports_centre  
De naam clubhuis zou je kunnen verwijderen, want dat is niet de clubnaam. 
Adressen horen alleen op de adresnodes en niet nog een keer op een gebouw. 
Check even of die adresnode aanwezig is. Anders laat je het zo. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-05-23 10:40:00+00:00): in de value hoor je klootschieten met een kleine k te schrijven Wanneer er een Engelse equivalent is heeft dat de voorkeur. even bij andere banen kijken of in de wiki.
eggie (2019-05-23 10:41:44+00:00): Dit is wellicht beter op het clubhuis  
club=sport 
Want het gaat maar om één sport hier.
user_5359 (2019-05-24 11:29:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I canI made the corrections as far as possible, but unfortunately I also had to delete inaccurate (all major ... cards) and advertisements.’t find the street of your address nearby. 
May I ask if they used a program to create the entry, or someone else advised them?
olo81 (2020-02-20 00:53:18+00:00): tutaj to bym się nie zgodził, normalna droga leśna, piernikarka to niezamieszkała dawna osada, od strony maczek jest zakaz wiazdu z dopuszczeniem ruchu dla mieszkańców. Właściciele domków czasami doglądają terenu. Od strony burek droga jest gorsza niż od strony maczek.