piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zarl (2016-07-08 19:59:11+00:00): Komm mal runter. Du wurdest hier auf einen Fehler hingewiesen, den du in vier Monaten nach deinem Edit nicht selbst erkannt hast. Das war auch kein Eingabefehler, du hast einen korrekten Strassennamen verändert. Dann noch "knowledge" als Quelle angegeben und einen absolut merkwürdigen Changeset-Kommentar. 

"Wenn ich Fehler bemerke, berichtige ich sie auch. Wenn nicht, dann nicht..." - was ist das denn für ne Aussage?

Dann mach halt mal die Korrektur...
Nakaner (2016-03-17 17:38:28+00:00): Hallo SWF8,

könntest du bitte beim Hochladen deiner Änderungssätze einen kurzen Änderungssatzkommentar eingeben. Dann können andere Mapper deine Edits leichter nachvollziehen. Ansonsten besteht die Gefahr, dass man falsche Schlüsse zieht und dir ungewollt Sachen unterstellt, die nicht wahr sind.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
SWF8 (2016-03-17 17:44:08+00:00): Hallo Michael,

mach ich eh meistens - speziell bei größeren Edits. Bei kleineren ist oft leider keine Zeit dafür. Was unterstellt man mir denn?

LG
Nakaner (2016-03-17 17:49:23+00:00): Nee, man unterstellt dir nichts. Aber wenn man eines Tages deine Edits nachvollziehen will, weil etwas komisch ist, dann schadet es nicht, wenn es einen nützlichen Änderungssatz-Kommentar gibt. Das kann z.B. sein, wenn du etwas löscht. Eine begründete Löschung ("Ladengeschäft geschlossen") ist da hilfreich, während eine unbegründete zu Nachfragen führt, die man hätte vermeiden können. Das meinte ich mit "unterstellen".

Wenn man mehrfach dasselbe gemacht hat, dann kann der auch über mehrere Änderungssätze hinweg gleich sein.

Aber bitte nicht so inhaltslose Kommentare wie: "Details ergänzt", dann bitte lieber "Bahn-Tags an Gleisen ergänzt".
Hjart (2016-03-16 22:37:06+00:00): Bing imagery appears to be several meters off, so I'll recommend that Geodatastyrelsen is used instead
archie (2016-03-17 11:37:18+00:00): Nu har jeg rettet ifølge Geodatastyrelsen. Er det korrekt nu?
Hjart (2016-03-17 11:43:11+00:00): Det ser bedre ud. Tak skal du have.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-17 13:05:31+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical edit.  At least one object http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402973092/history has had to be changed after your edit.
Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for more details.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
pbrewczynski (2016-03-16 16:44:59+00:00): Burmistrz Dukli zmierza dopłacać za tworzenie nowej komercyjnej mapy.

Być może ktoś zechciałby przekonać go, że warto zatrudnić kilku takich jak my, i potem drukować do woli mapki z OpenStreet maps?

Paweł
BeKri (2016-05-02 21:37:30+00:00): Servus,
es geht um die powerline 106928600, v6
irgendwie seh ich da weder Drähte noch Masten und die Masten stehen auf der Straße oder im Aldi ...
Zeit für abandoned:line ???
Gruss derBeKri
Владимир К (2016-04-07 09:27:21+00:00): Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74431%2C52.39393%3B55.74420%2C52.39180#map=19/55.74424/52.39287
these routes are wrong. So, it would be great, if you add relations for right routing and finish your #to-fix job. Or I will revert such chengesets, because it makes much more routine job, than improvements
DannyAiquipa (2016-04-07 15:41:43+00:00): Hello!  Thanks for your feedback!
I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, 
I've already reverted my  changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38384184
trigpoint (2016-03-16 17:54:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to openstreetmap.
The name tag is for verifable names of objects, it is a ventilation tower but that belongs in a tag such as tunnel=ventilation tower rather than the name.
I am certain it has no name that it is known locally by, and Don Juan Deli is totally ridiculous.
Little Onion (2016-03-16 18:44:40+00:00): sorry i'm new to the tagging - its is ventilation tower and surprisingly - it has become known as the Don Juan Deli - after it featured in an art work ...i'll try and change it if its wrong to label it this way :-)
trigpoint (2016-03-16 18:47:46+00:00): Thanks, I have already changed it and added a few more that I remember
trigpoint (2016-03-16 18:51:04+00:00): Sorry, the deli bit made it look like a spam edit
ToeBee (2016-03-21 04:12:52+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your additions. I'm in Manhattan, KS and try to keep an eye on the general Kansas area. Let me know if you have any questions. And FYI, it looks like you accidentally dragged a parking meter point half a block out of place in this edit. I fixed it for you :)
SomeoneElse (2016-06-30 12:05:18+00:00): Hello,
Something went a bit wrong with one of the University of Nevada's parking lots at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404106343/history .  One of the nodes got added in the north pacific at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4063771189/history#map=19/46.34952/-145.67514 .  I've deleted that node, but the rest of the area now looks incomplete.
Cheers,
Andy
apm-wa (2016-05-11 16:18:07+00:00): Этого здания нет, его снесли.  Здесь только новые здания.  Смотрите http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
apm-wa (2016-05-11 16:22:34+00:00): Этого здания (и много его соседей) нет, оно было снесено год назад.
ramyaragupathy (2016-04-26 14:40:37+00:00): Hey @SanjeevKumarT, there are buildings traced in this changeset that are not in line with satellite imagery. Can you please correct these?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404113925/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406139815/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406139822/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406139820/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403929443/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404023679/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404981467/history
literan (2016-03-17 11:54:35+00:00): Пинта крафта https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4063775042 - что, действительно во дворе? это лоток?
morsya (2016-03-17 12:02:03+00:00): Подвинула на место
Nakaner (2016-03-17 17:26:11+00:00): Wenn die Kilometrierung mittels Hektometertafel angegeben ist, ergänzt man auch noch railway=milestone. Für JOSM gibt es unter Vorlagen → Objektvorlagen-Einstellungen sogar eine spezielle Eisenbahn-Infrastrukturvorlage, sodass du die Tags nicht manuell eingeben musst.
Anoniman (2016-03-18 23:49:03+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Ist erledigt und korrigiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37930209
Anoniman (2016-03-30 16:45:41+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,

ich habe nochmal recherchiert und folgende Doppeldeutigkeit in der Definition von Eisenbahnkilometersteinen (railway=milestone) gefunden:
- Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dmilestone wird als Schlüssel für die Kilometerangabe lediglich distance=* angegeben. JOSM nutz diesen Schlüssel. Dieser Schlüssel wird, soweit ich weiß, von der OpenRailwayMap (http://www.openrailwaymap.org/) nicht ausgelesen.
- Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging wird als Schlüssel für die Kilometerangabe railway:position=* angegeben.
Warum diese Doppeldeutigkeit?

Grüße
Anoniman
Nakaner (2016-03-30 17:23:36+00:00): Warum die ORM kein distance=* unterstützt, kann ich dir nicht genau sagen. Es hat vermutlich teils historische Gründe. Vielleicht war damals, als railway:position=* eingeführt wurde, distance=* auch noch seltener in Gebrauch. distance=* gaukelt eine Entfernung vor, was falsch ist, denn Eisenbahnkilometrierungen können Fehl- und Überllängen haben, die durch Streckenverlegungen (z.B. Tagebaue, Bahnhofsverlegungen, neue Spurpläne in Bahnhöfen, …) entstehen.

In der Praxis wird railway:distance=* mittlerweile deutlich öfter eingesetzt In Deutschland sind es ca. 23.300 Hektometertafeln mit railway:position=*, während es weltweit nur ca. 2200 distance=* an Objekten mit railway=* gibt.

Das OpenRailwayMap-Tagging ist in einigen Bereichen noch nicht in die anderen Wiki-Seiten eingeflossen.
jptolosa (2016-04-16 07:59:08+00:00): Hola, el cambio que hiciste en el límite internacional es incorrecto. El Tratado de 1982 dice que el límite internacional en la boca oriental del Estrecho de Magallanes es una línea recta que une los hitos de Punta Dungeness con el del Cabo Espíritu Santo. Incluso había una nota que creo no leíste. Lo he vuelto a corregir. Saludos.
ViriatoLusitano (2016-03-16 20:55:23+00:00): Bom trabalho!
apires (2016-03-17 10:07:30+00:00): Obrigado. Ainda está em revisão...
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ligfietser (2016-03-18 07:42:41+00:00): Sander, waarom zet je deze weer op de kaart, had  'm onlangs verwijderd want het gebouw is afgebroken. Zie ook mapillary en de landuse=construction.
Sander H (2016-03-18 19:27:13+00:00): Weet niet welk pand je precies bedoelt, maar een algemene reactie:

Dit is een van de pijnpunten van de plugin die we onderkend hebben. Panden met status sloopvergunning worden nu ook nog meegenomen. En ook achterlopende administratie van de gemeenten kan hieraan bijdragen als ze nog op in gebruik staan.

Er was in dit gebied 1 pand (Pelikaanstraat 1) dat building=demolished had, en deze heb ik niet meegenomen met de import.
Verder is het onmogelijk om te zien waar iemand een gebouw verwijderd heeft.
We overwegen om te adviseren de tags building:abandoned, building:disused, disused:building en abandoned:building te gebruiken zodat men contour kan laten staan met deze tag (en ref:bag laten staan) zodat ze niet geherimporteerd worden als de gemeente achterloopt maar dit blijft een aandachtspunt en gaat lastig zijn om alle mappers hiermee op 1 lijn te krijgen.

De plugin de OSM history te laten doorzoeken op het voormalig bestaan van de betreffende bag id zal ook geen afdoende soelaas bieden aangezien ik gemerkt heb dat enkele mappers deze tags er ook rucksichtlos afslopen en enkel de building tag er op laten zitten.

Eigenlijk teveel situaties die mis kunnen gaan. Het beste lijkt de gemeenten aan te sporen de boel beter bij te houden...
GerdP (2017-09-09 04:58:32+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you sometimes used addr:street instead of name. Is this intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122616
koshka (2017-09-09 12:31:54+00:00): Hi, no, that was a mistake. I fixed the tags now.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2016-03-18 07:36:45+00:00): Hej:)
Czy mógłbyś mi napisać, dlaczego umieściłeś nazwę miejscowości (Chyrowa) w polu przeznaczonym na nazwę ulicy?
Często się to zdarza i próbuję poznać powód.
pbrewczynski (2016-03-18 07:43:14+00:00): To raczej nie ja. 

Ja tylko dodawałem pola. Na pensjonacie "Pod Chyrową"
pbrewczynski (2016-03-18 07:44:11+00:00): Ale jeśi miałbym zgadnąć dlaczego ludzie tak robią, to rzekłbym że nazwa ulicy i nazwa miejscowości w małych miejscowościach to jedność.

Tutaj np. jest kilkadziesiąt domów i każdy ma adres "Chyrowa 1, Chyrowa 2 itd."
maraf24 (2016-03-18 10:00:40+00:00): Tak, pisałem o pensjonacie. W polu z ulicą była Chyrowa i w polu z miastem była Chyrowa.
Z formalnego punktu widzenia (i tak właśnie jest w OSM), to w Chyrowej nie ma nazw ulic i w adresie podaje się tylko miejscowość i numer domu. Podanie w takiej sytuacji jeszcze ulicy powoduje problemy z wyszukiwaniem takiego adresu.
W każdym razie poprawiamy te błędy, co tutaj już zrobiłem.
5m4u9 (2016-03-17 04:43:30+00:00): gracias por añadir este negocio al mapa.

El editor que utilizaste es bueno, pero uno mejor y más actual es iD editor. 

A veces para categorizar mejor hay que buscar por sinónimo de la tienda o lugar, y no es necesario añadir el tipo de tienda en el nombre. 

Mejoré la info desde su página de Facebook a veces tiene info valiosa de contacto en su pestaña.

Dale, anímate a añadir otros lugares o a reportar como error (icono 2do de la derecha por abajo).
jinalfoflia (2016-03-17 05:53:09+00:00): Hi gregcrago,

Can you please name the relations that you have deleted? Thank you!
manings (2016-03-22 06:14:34+00:00): I looked into the edits and it seems there are a lot complex route and turn restrictions. :(  I find it difficult to fix.
Harry Wood (2016-04-20 20:54:26+00:00): Interesting. A new pizza place!
I tried to survey this myself but the photo came out blurry. There's a new place called "tootoomoo" there somewhere too, but I'll have to go survey it properly to figure out what got replaced.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-17 12:15:59+00:00): Thanks for deleting - for more info see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/907 .
Hjart (2016-03-16 20:52:31+00:00): Er du sikker på at stenen har sin egen officielle webside?
ff5722 (2016-03-16 21:00:01+00:00): Der skal være 'description' så?
Hjart (2016-03-16 21:06:45+00:00): Jeg tror "url"  vil være mere passende for et link der bare indeholder lidt info om emnet. Men en uddybende "description"  er i mange tilfælde også godt.
Hjart (2016-03-16 21:07:32+00:00): Det er jo også ret begrænset hvad der er at læse om ham på den side :-)
ff5722 (2016-03-16 21:13:54+00:00): Som du kan se fra billede på website er den mindesten selv også ikke enormt informativ...
Hjart (2016-03-16 21:23:01+00:00): Ok. jeg søgte på rudersdal.dk og fandt kun et navn. Den side du har angivet er selvfølgelig meget bedre. Undskyld.
Martin Chovanec (2019-08-17 16:20:08+00:00): Hi, 
I would like you to help me to understand why you you decided to tag the Praha - Poříčany railway line with "passenger_lines=2" where there are actually three lines.

I was reading the corresponding wiki page but haven't figured out the reason why it should be 2 instead of 3.

Thank you for explaining me.
Best,
Martin
Huldega (2019-08-18 19:56:40+00:00): Hi Martin,
the answer is very easy - I made a mistake... (downloaded only the two pendolino-tracks)
I changed it to 3 from Praha-Liben to Poříčany. In Praha-Liben some tracks are left. Maybe you have the better overview here.

Thanks and kind regards,
Huldega
Hjart (2016-03-16 21:52:11+00:00): Når den nu kun eksisterer på tegnebrættet er det vist bedst vi laver den til en "proposed"
maraf24 (2016-03-18 22:13:05+00:00): A jakie jest źródło tych ścieżek, bo odbiegają nieco od faktycznego przebiegu?
user_5359 (2016-03-17 10:37:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you know, that you move a church on the railway?
user_5359 (2016-03-17 10:38:18+00:00): And for the PO BOX: Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 13:50:09+00:00): Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also, although it only affects two areas they're on the other side of the planet, so this changeset appears in the history list of everyone in the northern hemisphere :)
Luis36995 (2016-03-24 16:06:17+00:00): "I worked on connectivity errors with To-Fix: http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. About my changeset I did not realize that my changes were in two distant places. I'll be careful next time. Thank you"
Piskvor (2016-03-17 07:48:39+00:00): Gratuluju k tchýni a přeju zdar a sílu k mapování ;)
scruss (2016-03-17 16:35:09+00:00): discussion here - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-March/006792.html - please contribute
MarcoR (2016-03-18 13:41:52+00:00): Ciao!

Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap ;)

Cerca di non connettere strade/sentieri con altri oggetti (linee elettriche o foreste per esempio) perché nella realtà, generalmente, non sono collegati tra loro e in più diventa poi difficile migliorare/modifcare qualcosa quando è tutto appicicato insieme :)

Ti segnalo la presenza nella zona di altri mappatori/ciclisti: CircoloPorto (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CircoloPorto ), mauche (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mauche ) e kitregreg (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kitegreg ).

Per il resto buon mapping,

Marco.
Mike Baggaley (2016-04-06 16:22:35+00:00): The junction of Clyde Arc and Govan Road now has way 133800148 with oneway=yes;no and running into a one way segment of Govan Road. This doesn't seem quite right.

Regards,
Mike
cadsauxk (2016-12-04 21:34:07+00:00): Hi Patodiez, why mapping all these residential streets as living_streets? I would have thought they were residential with access=no.
best wishes
Gerald
scruss (2016-03-17 16:23:40+00:00): Hi - are these points imports from open data? If so, you have to go through the right process, and discuss it on the talk-ca mailing list first.
GS25 (2016-05-23 06:59:28+00:00): Hi there.  Your recent edits in this area have many mistakes.  Please change your edits to the previous state.
Viajero Perdido (2016-03-17 05:26:17+00:00): Actually the last few changesets have covered ALL of Edmonton.  I figured out how to streamline the process, so I'm aiming to finish the whole city shortly.
apm-wa (2016-05-04 01:38:06+00:00): Этого здания нет, оно было снесено во время реконструкции Ниязов шаелы.  Советую использовать более новый снимок http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
SomeoneElse (2016-03-17 12:46:07+00:00): Would it be possible to explain what the change here actually was?  "Solve coastline error lines" doesn't really describe it.  the last two changesets affecting http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404032475/history are "Fixing boundary..." and "Solve coastline...", so I suspect there's some communication between mappers that ought to be taking place.  If there was a problem with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37884142 , I'd suggest explaining it in a discussion comment on that changeset (and the same goes for any other change that you've "fixed").  People won't know that they've caused a problem unless you tell them (politely) what it is, and if they don't know about it they may do the same thing again.
Best Regards,
Andy
SK53 (2016-03-17 12:54:17+00:00): Yes more detailed comments would be appreciated. We only realised 2 days ago that the Western Isles are a complete mess: there are likely to be coastline & boundary problems as we work to get islands to actually fit in the boundary. For reference when I started working on this again this morning JOSM was reporting a considerable number of coastline errors which it was not reporting last night. Also OSM Inspector shows several areas where there are two sets of coastlines: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=-7.28798&lat=57.13385&zoom=12&overlays=coastline,coastline_error_lines,line_not_a_ring,line_overlap,line_invalid,line_direction,questionable,coastline_error_points,unconnected,intersections,not_a_ring,double_node,tagged_node.

I will be adding another changeset which *may* resolve some of these, but trying to fix ad hoc problems shown by OSM Inspector is likely to be counter productive as most coastline ways in this area will need to be progressively replaced by better geometries.
GinaroZ (2016-03-17 12:58:09+00:00): Doesn't help the confusion when the changeset has coastline changes in the Western Isles and also Italy!
jptolosa (2016-03-17 18:11:28+00:00): In this changeset I put source "OSM Inspector". Then you can know that I solve errors in coastline lines (like intersections with itself): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=-7.28129&lat=57.13217&zoom=14&opacity=1.00&overlays=coastline,coastline_error_lines,line_not_a_ring,line_overlap,line_invalid,line_direction,questionable,coastline_error_points,unconnected,intersections,not_a_ring,double_node,tagged_node

Someone drawing a new coastline, but he didn't complete the work and he didn't remove the old coastline. I only delete the old coastline and fit the boundary to the new coastline (before it was fit to the old coastline) for not to break the boundary relation.
singleton (2016-03-18 15:36:37+00:00): Hi, you retagged Madhyavarti Ropavatika as leisure=park, but it is a plant nursery, not a park, and the tag landuse=plant_nursery describes it best.
saintam1 (2016-05-30 22:47:43+00:00): Hello, a user reported (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/573538) that this car repair shop doesn't exist any more, is that correct?
saintam1 (2016-10-16 16:12:25+00:00): I deleted it, let me know if that was the wrong decision.
nyampire (2016-03-17 14:47:16+00:00): こんばんは。
存在しないPOIや地物を編集しているように見受けられます。OpenStreetMapは、現実の世界を地図に記載する国際的なプロジェクトであり、世界的な協調が求められています。
あなたの行為は破壊行為にあたり、看過することはできません。

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E7%A0%B4%E5%A3%8A%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA

よって、編集された地物の削除を行います。
kara2783 (2016-05-15 06:35:36+00:00): 存在しない地物というのはどなたからの情報でしょうか。情報提供者がいらっしゃるのなら
メールアドレスと内容の提示を願います。
nyampire (2016-05-15 07:53:16+00:00): 逆に、この名称の地物が存在する、という証明をいただけますか？

Mapillaryや、あるいはその他のサービスなどを使って現地写真をアップロードください。
Gumeg (2017-04-05 09:51:06+00:00): 52.0409046, 47.8148993 Эта точка гидранта на частном секторе, почти по центру. Это нормально?
Gumeg (2017-04-05 14:56:48+00:00): Кроме того многие точки включены в дорожные линии или задвоены.. Где увидел - поправил дубли.
j-wills (2016-04-09 11:54:54+00:00): Откуда светофоры и разворот на Варшавке?
mapper999 (2016-03-17 19:21:17+00:00): Hallo wegavision,
warum löschst du Adressinformationen von bestehenden Objekten? Bitte stelle die Adressen der Restaurants wieder her.
Bist du dir sicher, dass sich das Château Rhonse an dieser Stelle befindet? Ich meine es befindet sich ein Gebäude weiter östlich, zumindest ist der Eingang in der Seitenstraße.
wegavision (2016-03-17 20:30:08+00:00): Habe nichts gelöscht, sondern Adresse hinzugefügt. Vielleicht war da die Adresse nur auf dem Loka l und nicht auf den Gebäude, dann habe ich die Adresse dem Gebäude zugeordnet.
whb (2016-03-18 21:28:07+00:00): Hier wurden die Adressen entfernt, inzwischen aber schon wieder von mapper999 repariert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300719729/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/265939590/history
Glenn Plas (2016-03-17 11:51:44+00:00): Hallo,

Welkom bij openstreetmaps, en proficiat met jouw eerste edit.   Niet slecht maar er zitten een aantal zaken toch niet helemaal goed.  foot=yes is impliciet op een road, er is geen nood om dit specifiek te vermelden.  Je vermeld ook dat er geen cycleway is in de kreupelstraat, maar dat is verkeerd.  Indien er geen fietspad is dan gebruik je cycleway=shared , zie ook http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Zelfde verhaal met oneway=no .  Dit is impliciet zo op highways, er wordt vanuit gegaan dat dit de standaard is.

Ik zal jouw edits verbeteren zodat je kan zien wat het had moeten worden.  Ik woon zelf in Weerde, dus ik ben van de streek.   Mvg en veel success  nog met het editeren.  Indien je vragen hebt, stuur ze maar op.  Vergeet niet om de wiki goed te bestuderen voor de juiste tags en afspraken, bij twijfel is het beter even een vraag te stellen.

Glenn
Glenn Plas (2016-03-17 12:01:22+00:00): Op de Eetveldstraat heb je dubbel gezet, deze straat staat reeds in de data, nu staat ze er dubbel en ze overlappen
maraf24 (2016-03-17 09:50:30+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
Jeśli chcesz coś takiego robić, najpierw przedyskutuj to tutaj 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
literan (2016-03-17 12:13:46+00:00): Извините, но вот это - рисование под рендерер, что категорически запрещено правилами. На панорамах ясно видно, что эта надпись не лежит на боку, и это не заборы: http://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=8&ll=37.59681416713666%2C55.576816429391805&pa=261.5&pp=37.59681642%2C55.57681159 Удаляю.
DD1GJ (2016-03-20 08:00:12+00:00): Hausnummern wurden wg. inkompatibler Liegenschaftskarte nach Rücksprache zurückgesetzt, siehe CS 37950976
Nakaner (2020-04-30 06:51:51+00:00): Hi,

why did you add place=* tags to the boundary relations you uploaded in this changeset? What's their purpose on a relation?

Best regards

Michael