piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dolfscoot (2019-07-26 20:40:12+00:00): Oké dat klinkt dan weer als groot voordeel van josm. Op die schipholweg heb ik een keer of 20 dezelfde handelingen moeten verrichten voor al die losse stukjes fietspad. Ik ga er nog wel es mee spelen.

Net heb ik de fiets routing getest bij deze bewuste kronkel (met OSRM) en ja hoor, het werkt nu! Beide kanten op. Hier ben ik wel trots op hoor, hier was het me om te doen. De belangrijkste fout was trouwens (vermoed ik) dat dat stukje autorijbaan (die bocht) niet was voorzien van bicycle=no moped=no. De routing gaf blijkbaar de voorkeur voor deze rijbaan ipv het fietspad. Daardoor liep de route daar dood. Dat verklaart ook waarom Graphhopper die fout niet maakte, die geeft blijkbaar prioriteit aan het fietspad en dat liep wel door, ook al zaten daar allerlei foutjes in.
eggie (2019-07-26 20:54:03+00:00): Je kunt in JOSM presets instellen en gebruiken die andere mappers hebben gemaakt. 
Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077
viloan (2019-07-24 02:57:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chnav (2019-07-24 06:52:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, объясните пожалуйста причину удаления зданий с карты. Спасибо.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:28:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет название деревни с "Чумашкина" на "Чумашкино". Официальное название деревни, указанное в Законе Тюменской области от 05.11.2004 № 263, "Чумашкина".  
  
Коневское сельское поселение  
  
д. Бития  
с. Конево  
д. Лапина  
д. Поротникова  
д. Чумашкина  
д. Шалашина  
  
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
Everette M (2019-07-24 05:43:02+00:00): ..."and fixed by Everette" <.<
These are not residential roads. Please read wiki.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:58:49+00:00): Please make amendment for this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706856742

From my daily commute, this stretch of highway is barely navigable by cars. It is close to a track rather than a residential highway.
user_5359 (2019-07-24 11:34:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must delete your entry, because you mark the wrong building.
Sosha1996 (2019-07-24 05:34:03+00:00): اصلاح شامل نغییر جهت مسیر(یک طرفه). ایجاد مسیر رفت و برگشت. ایجاد میدان. تصحیح درجه جاده. تصحیح کوچه‌ها و خیابان‌های منتهی به جاده. تصحیح ردیف درخت میان جاده.
Filip009 (2021-09-29 18:59:28+00:00): Dobrý deň, pri vytváraní multipolygónov prosím používajte klávesovú skratku Ctrl+B, pretože tá vymaže tagy natural=scrub alebo iné automaticky a prenesie ich na multipolygón. Pokiaľ to tak neplánujete robiť, odstraňujte prosím tieto tagy z čiar (way). Vďaka.
laznik (2021-09-29 19:09:32+00:00): Takto to zvycajne robievam, ale nerobil som to tak vzdy. Ak je takychto pripadov viac, tak prosim uviest ich adresy a ja to opravim.
Filip009 (2021-09-29 19:18:49+00:00): Opravil som ich zo 15, čo zadali do zadania na maproulette, majú to exportované pre celú východnú Európu, vrátane Slovenka, čiže by už mali byť fixnuté všetky.
vasony (2019-07-29 11:15:35+00:00): Szia!

A házszámozásnál elég az addr: mezőket kitölteni, a name mezőbe nem szükséges beírni az egész címet, mint pl. "Gergő utca 36"

Tamás
Glassman (2019-07-28 19:58:24+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type an "q" - they'll look much nicer.

Also - I removed the building tag for the large area and changed it to landuse instead. 

I also removed the area for the mountain bike park - is that a park or a trail? If you do add it back in, be sure to not attach it to the power lines. If you do, then the software will expect to see a tower at the node. (The editor does like to snap to nearby objects.
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 17:16:28+00:00): Amended roads, looks OK.
abrensch (2019-07-29 07:13:40+00:00): Hallo tiglerseb,

Du hast da ein richtiges Loch in die Packer Strasse (B70) gebaut, und das passt überhaipt nicht zu Deiner Beschreibung.
Luzandro (2019-07-29 09:36:45+00:00): Ja, dieser Abschnitt wurde jetzt komplett gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240395969/history

Wenn schon, könnte man es höchstens auf construction ändern, aber auch das ist bei vglw. kurzen, vorübergehenden Sperren, wo der Zustand danach wieder genauso ist wie davor (was hier wohl sehr wahrscheinlich ist), nicht sinnvoll, siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

"Bezüglich des Tagging von vorher existierenden Features, die wegen Erweiterung oder Reparatur gesperrt werden: Viele Datennutzer (insbesondere Tileserver Dritter, gedruckte Karten und Smartphones/Navis, die Daten offline vorhalten) aktualisieren nur alle paar Wochen oder Monate ihre Daten.
Daher sollten Sperrungen insbesondere von Straßen und Schienen unter sechs (manche Mapper meinen neun) Monate nicht als *=construction getaggt werden. Stattdessen sollte das Taggingschema Conditional Restrictions oder ein spezielles Schema für das Taggen temporärer Veränderungen verwendet werden, auch wenn es nicht von allen Routern unterstützt wird."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
Luzandro (2019-08-01 17:17:26+00:00): Wie unten zu sehen, wurde damit auch in etliche Relationen ein Loch gerissen. Ich habe daher das Changeset jetzt erst einmal rückgängig gemacht, dabei hoffentlich alle Konflikte korrekt aufgelöst und einen Kartenhinweis mit Verweis hierher angelegt.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
marczoutendijk (2019-07-24 12:23:16+00:00): Can't you see the mistake you have made with this new edit? You probably don't use the right tools. JOSM is far better editor which gives much more control over your work.
Please zoom in to this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306751516#map=18/53.69713/-1.32190

Don't you see that you now have connected both lanes of the Park Road (north of the roundabout) to the same junction of that roundabout? Please, fix that asap!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 16:57:41+00:00): Amended, looks OK, don't know about the lights though.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
chnav (2019-07-24 06:53:06+00:00): Здравствуйте, объясните пожалуйста причину удаления зданий с карты. Спасибо.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
iriman (2019-07-26 08:42:56+00:00): سلام، لطفا به راه دسترسی جایگاه‌های سوخت دسترسی مشتری بدین
access=customers

نمونه در ویکی:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

توضیحات دسترسی‌ها
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
fereydoon555 (2019-07-27 07:28:41+00:00): سلام اوکی اعمال میشه
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 16:34:37+00:00): Made some amendments looks OK
BCNorwich (2019-07-24 07:19:28+00:00): Hi, 

Regarding Way: 320459377, I'm pretty sure there is no meadow here. With respect I think you are mapping from imagery without any ground survey. Much of this area is developed. Please be sure about what you add to OSM. If not sure don't add.

Way: 706870012, a crossing is duplication, the crossing is a node on Aketon Road.

Way: 706870010, crosses a cycleway without joining to it, doubles back on itself.

Way: 706870008 is drawn over farmland. If this is really residential the the landuse=farmland should be removed/amended.

Way: 706870007 is a crossing that goes only to the centerline of the A639. Better to make the path cross the road and tag the crossing point on the joining/crossing node. 

Way: 706870006, does this join the A639 as a service road?

Way: 706870005 another strangely mapped crossing. the path is joined onto areas at one end. Sorry to say this area really is a mess.

Way: 706870004, a crossing path that doesn't join onto anything.

You've also seriously disrupted Way: 306751516, Doubled it back and severed it from the link to the roundabout, this is a primary highway. Thus Sat Nav routing will be useless. 

Please stop!

Regards Bernard.
marczoutendijk (2019-07-24 09:44:43+00:00): Dear BobTheEditor,
Thank you for your reply.
I have checked the above comments Bernard made, and they do make sense! 
Also you probably should review your other edits as well.  Please first try to fix those errors before continuing with new edits.
 
Also you should read the wikis:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

and probably join the forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=5

or join the mailing list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Thank you for your cooperation!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_10149683 (2019-07-25 05:07:15+00:00): Hi Marc Zoutendijk,
I will join Everything Above ^  and my edits do make sense.
Kind Regards,
Bob The Editor
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 13:30:54+00:00): Amended roads except Way: 306751516 which is on a different changeset.
BCNorwich (2019-11-04 12:33:48+00:00): Hello marczoutendijk,
After a lapse LukeTheEditor is mapping again. Please see this changeset :- 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76574602#map=17/53.69533/-1.30860&layers=N

The same problems are happening again. It's drawn the attention of another concerned mapper. What should we do, revert all future incorrect changesets? 

Regards Bernard.
marczoutendijk (2019-11-04 14:35:57+00:00): The DWG is aware of this (new) situation and we have informed user LukeTheEditor.
We asked him to reply to all your comments and discuss the situation to see what can be done to repair what was broken.

If reverts are necessary, please do so, but wait until we have a reply from LukeTheEditor (within 2 days). 
 
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
vulasala (2019-11-14 16:40:24+00:00): "Hi dudnickiy,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Kuala Terengganu, I have come across some ways:
"way 706874306
way 706874304
way 706874302
way 706874303
way 706874301"
classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
sovereign_ch (2019-07-24 11:59:28+00:00): Hi, hab mir erlaubt ein fehlendes oneway zu ergänzen und die "neue" Fussgängerampel zu korrigieren. Grüessli
nurdafur (2019-07-24 12:04:22+00:00): Uups, habe ich etwas über sehen. Gut dass du das gleich bemerkt hast. Zusammen machen wir die OSM besser. Grüässli zrugg
eggie (2019-07-24 08:28:51+00:00): Dag Nathan.. 
Bedankt voor je bijdrage... 
De info heb ik wel naar de adresnode verplaatst conform afspraken in OSM Nederland. 
Gebouwen krijgen geen (adres)gegevens.

MVG,
Eggie
Jakka (2019-07-25 06:09:51+00:00): ook voor cultureel centrum is er een bijzonder aanduiding voorzien. de Cultureel centrum is de beschrijving die in de tag moet staan en de naam is de officiële naam zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:How_to_map_a:C
eggie (2019-07-24 08:19:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Jakka (2019-07-25 06:06:52+00:00): nlet te snel groene pleintjes als park definiëren.... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en
Jakka (2019-07-25 06:05:00+00:00): graag even deze uitleg lezen toepassen. enkel de officiêle naam vermelden nu is het de beschrijving?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park
PT-53 (2019-07-25 06:21:50+00:00): Hallo googie0815,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du schreibst in Deinem Änderungssatz-Kommentar, daß die B 313 vor Sigmaringen endet. Das ist falsch. Wie Du im Bundesstraßenverzeichnis (https://www.bast.de/BASt_2017/DE/Verkehrstechnik/Fachthemen/v1-beverz/v1-berverz.html) nachlesen kannst, beginnt die B 313 bei Espasingen (bei Ludwigshafen am Bodensee)  und führt über Sigmaringen - Gammertingen bis Plochingen. Deshalb war die Straße zw. Sigmaringen und Gammertingen bisher mit ref=B 32;B 313 bezeichnet.
Wie ich auf Rückfrage von einem anderen OSM-Mitwirkenden erfahren habe, ist auf diesem Streckenabschnitt nur die B 32 ausgeschildert. Unter Berücksichtigung der in OSM verwendeten Regel "Wir mappen (nur) was wir sehen" ist Deine Änderung von ref auf "B 32" in Ordnung.

Die Ergänzung mit foot=no ist unnötig, da bei einer Kraftfahrtstraße (motorroad>=yes) dies als Standard unterstellt wird. Dies kannst Du hier nachlesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
foot=no kann also wieder raus.
Grüße
kasmar00 (2019-07-31 10:37:46+00:00): Hej, poprawiłeś obrysy budynków, które pochodzą z Ewidencji Gruntów i Budynków, defacto zmniejszyłeś ich dokładność.
Dodałeś punkty "Sucha 30a/b/c" z tagiem place=hamlet, który nie służy do oznaczania adresów, adrsy budynków wpisujemy w odpowiednie pola addr:street itp.
Dodatkowo dodałeś w losowych miejscach punkty bez żadnych znaczników, jest to niepotrzebne i zaśmieca bazę.
Wycofałem te zmiany.
freebeer (2019-07-28 08:14:03+00:00): hello again amazon team - i am almost starting to recognise your mappers by how they work without any username additions...

i just wrote in another comment, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72605960 , how that was the first flagged amazon edit i saw this morning - here is another similar case of co-located nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706892706 where the path loops over two co-located nodes, but here at the end there are somehow four(!) nodes atop each other.

it would interest me to know how this is happening, as i have seen other osm mappers adding duplicate nodes regularly, and if it is worthy to try to avoid this from the editor side, or what is the use case for these.

thanks
freebeer (2019-07-30 01:57:41+00:00): re-visiting, i note now the pair of nodes at one intermediate location is included over three slots describing the way.  (out of the ascending order one expects to see as assigned by the osm servers)

this is, as i now expect, flagged for this reason as a self-intersecting part of the way.

i should note that of the commonest self-intersections i repair, none have been added by your team.  but now i am beginning to suspect an issue within iD, but i need to see more examples to confirm a possible pattern.
gseethar (2019-08-02 11:42:46+00:00): Hi Freebeer,

I have made the change as per your suggestion and we are also looking for patterns in the same.

Regards,
Ganesh
user_5359 (2019-07-24 11:28:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-24 23:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72621743 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
marczoutendijk (2019-07-24 15:49:21+00:00): But this time you misspelled its name!
Can you fix that?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
BCNorwich (2019-07-24 17:23:59+00:00): Hi, 
You have also abbreviated Beechnut Lane to Beechnut Ln, please don't amend names (or anything else) without determining OSM best practices. 

You still have the damage to repair where Beechnut Lane joins the two carriageways of the A639 primary highway. This incorrect amendment will cause havoc to routers.

Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-07-31 13:03:06+00:00): Reinstated name and speed tags.
Joseph E (2019-08-09 09:01:38+00:00): Hi VLD103, thank you for improving the map here in Papua. We appreciate having more mappers at work adding the many missing roads, streets and rivers. 
I noticed that you added the tag "import=yes" to many roads. This tag should only be used as a changeset tag when you import data from an outside source, like another database. If you are tracing roads from aerial imagery, don't use this tag, just set the source.

Also, I'd recommend considering using other types of highway, not usually highway=service or highway=track, for any roads that have houses or other buildings along them in rural areas. If there is a road that connects several villages, it's probably a highway=tertiary. If it's just a road through to one tiny village or a few houses, use highway=unclassified. And use highway=residential for roads with houses directly on them, like village streets. 

Highway=track should be used for roads in plantations, farmland and forests that are just used for agriculture or forestry. On aerial imagery, these roads usually won't have any buildings along them and will not be the main way to access a town. They may be rather overgrown. 

The tag highway=service is used for driveway, alleys, aisle in parking lots, and similar service roads within one property; usually these are private, not public roads. In remote areas there can be service roads at a mine or plantation, but they won't connect a village to another. 

Sorry for the criticism. It took me a long time to figure these things out myself, and highway classification can be a little debatable sometimes. If you have no idea what type of road it is (or if its really a road, not a path for just walking and bikes), then you can always use highway=road, which lets other mappers know to add the right class later.

Have fun mapping!
freebeer (2019-08-09 09:50:11+00:00): hallo joseph,

> I noticed that you added the tag "import=yes" to many roads. This tag should only be used as a changeset tag when you import data from an outside source, like another database.

you do realise whom you are addressing here?  i hope...
Joseph E (2019-08-09 13:35:15+00:00): I believe user "VLD103" created this changeset. It looks like this mapper is with fb. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/VLD103
freebeer (2019-08-10 19:13:45+00:00): and i'm glad to see the thailand history behind facebook's use has made its way into the tagging mailing list discussion, so that i do not need to mis-remember it, or vainly seek to find it for some context.

i'm done here :-)