piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
uboot (2015-06-08 14:53:40+00:00): Hi Andi.
After reading the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix I thought, that the removed: prefix should be easier to handle than former_…-tags.

They are more used, too.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=former_
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=removed:

I am not aware of any support yet.
Javierpf (2015-10-22 18:28:52+00:00): estoy comparando el nombre de la calle way id 166999115 C. J. A. Ricardi, que en Bing figura con el nombre Juan Ricarde. ¿de donde surgio la referencia de Ricardi?
muralito (2015-10-23 11:13:09+00:00): Hola. Primero que nada, y lo mas importante de tu consulta, legalmente no podes ver o leer Bing u otros mapas cuya licencia no te lo permita, para comparar con OSM y corregirlo. La licencia de Bing no te lo permite. En todo caso, tenes que buscar una fuente habilitada o ir al sitio y relevarlo personalmente.

En cuanto al nombre, yo solo le puse el "." a la abreviatura, asi que lo que estas precisando es la fuente de nombre que ya tenía, cosa que desconozco porque no fui yo quien lo agregó.
Saludos,
M.
Javierpf (2015-10-28 15:48:06+00:00): ahh, gracias por la aclaración, pensé que se podia usar data de Bing. Profundice sobre este tema, y la autorizacion de Bing es solo para las imagenes aereas, 
Gracias
pschonmann (2015-05-15 21:22:27+00:00): Proč je ulice Mostní přepůlená ?
Hjart (2015-05-13 19:10:35+00:00): Det er bedre at tagge bilvejene med sidewalk=both end at tegne separate fortove.
Protoxenus (2015-06-19 14:43:24+00:00): Hallo,
du hast über die website wheelmap.org eine neue Hansa-Apotheke in Rostock angelegt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30932289). Offensichtlich bis du noch unerfahren im Umgang mit Editoren, mit die Daten in die OSM-Datenbank einpflegen. Ich möchte dich bitten, bevor du etwas neu anlegst oder änderst, erst mal zu schauen, ob das was du anlegen möchtest, nicht schon vorhanden ist. Die Hansa-Apotheke existiert schon etwas länger in der OSM-Datenbank und ist auch an der richtigen Stelle(da wo sie wirklich vorhanden ist, und nicht auf einem Fußweg) gemappt. Ich möchte dich aber trotzdem ermutigen, weiter bei OSM mitzumachen, denn wir können jeden dabei gebrauchen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Protoxenus
Hjart (2015-05-21 08:28:40+00:00): Hej

Jeg har tilladt mig at forenkle her ved at fjerne den gangsti der gik parallelt med vejen og i stedet tagge Charlottehøj med sidewalk=right. Det er generelt en fordel ikke at overkomplicere ting for meget og denne løsning giver en noget mere robust routing.
*Martin* (2015-06-22 12:02:57+00:00): Ahoj Mirecnet.

Tie výhľady sa volajú všetky "výhľad"? Idem na výhľad "výhľad" :-).

Podľa mňa nie. Do tagu name ide vlastné meno objektu, napr. "Tomašovský", nie všeobecné. Na to je ta ikona vyhľadu ktorú implikuje tag tourism=viewpoint.

Prosím oprav.

Ďakujem :-)
Jose Riha (2015-06-22 12:10:22+00:00): tak tak. navyse rendereru lahko mozno vysvetlit, ze vsetko oznacene znackou viewpoint bude mat zaroven nazov "vyhlad" (ak nie je uvedeny iny)
Mirecnet (2015-06-22 14:52:16+00:00): Dakujem za koment a pripomienku. Budem na to davat v buducnosti pozor. Je to opravene.
*Martin* (2015-06-22 15:06:02+00:00): dakujem :)
Chris Fleming (2015-05-12 10:53:53+00:00): Hi John, I would like to welcome you to OpenStreetMap and say that I've been very impressed by the quality of the changes you've been making.

My only comment is that it would be really useful if you could fill in some changeset comments to give some context to what you're doing. My General  suggestion would be to to say what you've changes and why you've made the change.

Thanks Chris.
M!dgard (2015-07-22 19:08:45+00:00): Excuse me, why the heck did you set all access tags of the ferry Hull-Zeebrugge to 'no'?
Alessio D'Innocenti (2015-05-09 12:38:53+00:00): Added missing street Via Mossa dei Barberi
jlcod (2015-05-11 23:32:35+00:00): hello, some camp sites had been removed in this changeset again. please do not remove them. thanks.

Hallo, hier wurden wieder einige Camps gelöscht. Bitte die Camps stehen lassen, sie wurden in Task 130 (http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1030) gefunden, mit neueren Bildern als von Bing. 

3 camps reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31021340
jlcod (2015-05-11 23:55:13+00:00): ich sah gerade deine Nachrichten auf der Mailingliste, leider sehen die Camps im ID-Editor wirklich aus als wären sie Umrisse ohne Funktion. Die Tags sind dann erst zu sehen, wenn man auf "alle Eigenschaften" klickt (z. B. wie in http://oi61.tinypic.com/jrwqib.jpg). Das hat schon einige Benutzer dazu gebracht die Camps zu löschen, da es leider wirklich nicht offensichtlich ist was es ist.
TiggerGermany (2015-07-13 09:33:27+00:00): Servus malenki,

der Burghof ist in Nominatim nun doppelt geführt. Der Place ergibt sich bereits aus dem entsprechenden Landuse. Hat so auch den Vorteil, dass die flächenmässige Größe des Place erfasst ist,

Also bitte entweder Deinen Place wieder rausschmeissen, oder aber dem landuse den Namen wieder entziehen.

LG,
Mike
malenki (2015-07-13 13:27:20+00:00): Hallo TiggerGermany,

ein Wohnplatz wird mit place getaggt, in diesem Fall ist es place=farm.
Ob das Tag an einem Node oder einer Fläche steht ist gleich – nur sollte es nicht einfach gelöscht werden. Da das "Deine" Region ist, darfst du gern entscheiden, ob du das von User streeet erstellte Node (das nicht "mir" gehört) behältst oder den place an das landuse schreibst.

Viele Grüße
Thomas
malcolmh (2015-05-09 15:27:07+00:00): Yes it will appear on marine maps! This is an inappropriate use of the "landuse" tagging, which is explicitly for features on land. Also it is "tagging for the renderer" - mis-using tags in order to produce an effect on the streetmap.

Please revert these and instead make a proposal for a "wateruse" or similar tag that will accurately describe these features.
Hjart (2015-11-09 15:19:26+00:00): Please note that Bing & other imagery isn't well aligned everywhere. It's often a very good idea to check with available gps & Strava traces. By aligning roads with Bing in this changeset you have moved some stretches of road away from their actual position.
dave683 (2018-04-14 20:46:01+00:00): hey renade, just doing a clean up of this area and im noticing a few points that have been placed around by you (and others) without any tags... were they placed by accident or is there some other purpose im not aware of?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=3507072963#map=19/-19.37009/22.16282
elmarburke (2015-05-11 12:47:03+00:00): Hallo alexr,
schön, dass du den ÖPNV am Niederrhein mappst. Mir sind aber mehrere kleine Fehler aufgefallen, die so vorher nicht drin waren; besonders bei der SB58 und der 50 in/um/durch Kleve. Daher würde mich interessieren, woher die Daten stammen.
Viele Grüße aus Kleve,
  Elmar
kartler175 (2015-05-10 23:26:36+00:00): MP eignen sich nicht zur Zusammenfassung von Objekten auf einem Gelände. So gehören Objekte mit der Rolle inner nicht zu der Fläche, die durch das MP definiert werden.
Sorbus_x_kewensis (2015-05-09 21:17:54+00:00): Hi Pmailkeey,

I partially reverted your changesets as I could not repair the routing / relation errors any other way. I did leave your other edits in place, where correct or salvageable. Your most recent changes were still incorrect I'm afraid. Could you tell me what you based your original edits on? I didn't see any comments with your changesets also. This changeset still contains errors:

- The 146 relation now excludes the actual route the bus takes. The bus route turns through the one-way sections.
- High Street Downe meets Luxted road in two places, with road markings 'no entry' on the south side (visible with Bing aerial images). This is why the road was split in two, to reflect the reality on the ground. The road does not rejoin into a two-way stretch before joining with Luxted Road as your edits imply. 
- The road layout is not rounded like you have reverted it to. It has two roughly  straight sided lanes, one in each direction with a small section of pavement dividing the High Street where it meets Luxted Road.
- Routing engines need to take the missing oneway sections into account.

I'm happy to send you up to date photos to help you map the junction correctly, or likewise, I can make the corrections myself. At present, however, this changeset has reintroduced errors, and I would like to correct these as soon as possible please.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-18 19:27:26+00:00): Reverted
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-18 19:20:40+00:00): Reverted
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-10 05:54:15+00:00): I'm just curious, but what's the source for all the of business info you've been adding recently?  I'm only asking because I haven't seen any mentioned on any of your changesets.  Listing a 'source' is very helpful in allowing other mappers to know how you collected the data in case there's any problems with it (like tagging problems).
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-10 05:56:11+00:00): Oh, and before I forget, welcome to OSM!
GeoKitten (2015-05-17 19:36:39+00:00): I get this information when I'm in the area. Either I've visited these stores before, I write down their location, or I take pictures of them. I'm sorry that I haven't tagged these with source=survey. Is that the correct thing to do?
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-18 01:31:13+00:00): Yes, the 'source=survey' is the proper thing to do.  You add it to the changeset comments. However, I just noticed you can't properly add the 'source=survey' tag to changesets via iD via a quick changeset that I made.  So, I recommend to at least add the text '(survey)' to the end of your changeset comment.  Seems to be the only way possible with iD.
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-18 01:32:27+00:00): It's that or take a leap into the more experienced editor, JOSM. ;)  If you decide to do that, if you have any questions about that editor, let me know via PM and I'll help ya out. ;)
ViriatoLusitano (2015-12-04 01:50:36+00:00): Olá.

Compreendo a mapeação da futura e possível zona inundável do Rio Tua após a construção da barragem, contudo uma das "regras" do OSM é mapear o que existe.

Será que esta informação é já necessária?
topolusitania (2015-12-16 23:22:14+00:00): Olá.
Um bom tema para se discutir em talk-pt ;-)
A necessidade ou não da informação depende de pessoa para pessoa. É um facto que a barragem está a ser construída, e que o que está desenhado vai ser realidade dentro de um par de meses...
maraf24 (2015-05-12 10:21:53+00:00): Wycofane.
flohoff (2015-05-10 07:09:36+00:00): 
Hi,
leider hast du in den changesets von Gestern nirgendwo changeset beschreibungen hinterlassen. Jetzt fange ich hier wieder an zu raten was das alles ist.

Das hier sieht nach landuse verfeinerungen aus. Richtig?

Flo
maraf24 (2015-05-09 21:09:37+00:00): Proszę uzasadnić tę zmianę w dopuszczalnych prędkościach.
A w kolejnych edycjach proszę wypełniać pole komentarza do zmian.
maraf24 (2015-05-12 10:22:01+00:00): Wycofane.
naoliv (2015-07-16 05:44:37+00:00): natinacio, como você está inserindo esses dados?
Você está adicionando, por exemplo, traffic_calming=Lombada (isso não existe)
O JOSM já exibe uma lista de valores conhecidos para a chave traffic_calming
natinacio (2015-07-16 12:24:28+00:00): No meu JOSM está como
chave traffic_calming  valor=bump
mas quando edito o nó tenho a opção de em
Estrada/Pontos da via/Redutor de velocidade e ai ele me dá uma lista de opção : lombada, chicane, sonorizador, ...
naoliv (2015-07-16 12:25:07+00:00): Mas o JOSM gerou o valor como traffic_calming=Lombada ?
natinacio (2015-07-16 12:38:20+00:00): No menu tem a opção Lombada mas depois nas propriedades do tag aparece como
 traffic_calming=bump
natinacio (2015-07-16 12:39:14+00:00): versão do JOSM 8159
naoliv (2015-07-16 14:50:35+00:00): Isso. A tag inserida foi "traffic_calming=Lombada"
Essa parte que achei estranha.
natinacio (2015-07-16 14:58:30+00:00): Li na comunidade da wikiopenstreetmap que estão tendo conflito com termos em ingles e portugues. Vou alterar os que for achando por =bump
naoliv (2015-07-16 14:59:42+00:00): Se o valor for inserido manualmente, nunca vai ser em português.
Se foi o JOSM que acabou criando isso, precisa ver, porque é grave.
natinacio (2015-07-16 15:27:43+00:00): O próprio JOSM me dá uma lista pra escolher tipo: lombada,chicane,gargantilha,almofada,lombada rápida,ilha, sonorizador e faixa elevada para pedestres. Sem ter que escrever nada.
Será esse foi eu que escrevi "Lombada", o JOSM na lista está "lombada" com L minusculo???
naoliv (2015-07-16 15:32:37+00:00): Acho que sim.
Apesar dele exibir as opções em português, ele gera as tags em inglês.
O motivo de exibir em português seria apenas para facilitar a escolha do usuário. Por exemplo, ele escolhe "lombada" sem precisar saber, a princípio, que lombada é "bump".
natinacio (2015-07-16 15:41:11+00:00): Vou atentar para esse detalhe, nas proximas edições.
naoliv (2015-07-16 15:43:47+00:00): Se você mandar validar os dados o JOSM avisa sobre isso. Vai aparecer como nivel informacional (Outro), falando que o valor não existe.
É sempre bom validar os dados, já que alguma coisa sempre escapa.
Chris Fleming (2015-05-10 20:45:23+00:00): Thanks for the note and edit, it's great to see  new Editors. please let me know if you have any questions.

One thing that I'm wondering, is that if this recycling point is permanently closed, then it's probably okay to delete the recycling point.
tOsE (2015-05-09 18:05:45+00:00): Den Imbiss gibt's seit Jahren nicht mehr
und bei dem anderen Punkt habe ich den Namen ergänzt
tOsE (2015-05-09 18:04:44+00:00): Standort Punkt korrigiert
maraf24 (2015-05-09 20:42:32+00:00): Is this tag removal and transformation discussed with polish community?
bdiscoe (2015-05-25 02:04:55+00:00): Hi maraf24, I believe I only removed a few tags, which were uncontroversially incorrect or extraneous.  If there is a page that describes the Wroclaw building import, please direct me to it.
martingggg (2015-05-09 21:27:40+00:00): WTF?
milovanderlinden (2015-05-10 00:32:30+00:00): What is wrong? I did a couple of map spins, zoomed in and mapped buildings, added islands to a lake in the south of Chili, connected some roads. Nothing unusual I think?
mapper999 (2015-05-09 22:19:26+00:00): Hallo fetterwurm,
ich habe deine Änderungen aus folgenden Gründen wieder rückgemacht:
- du hast eine der Leitplanken vermutlich versehentlich gelöscht.
- es ist weitgehend Konsens, dass Landnutzungen nicht mit Straßen und Wegen verbunden werden. Zum einen erleichtert es das Bearbeiten (z.B. das Auswählen der Linien/Flächen), zum anderen wächst auf der Autobahn nun mal kein Gras ;)
luiswoo (2015-05-09 23:29:49+00:00): Это озеро такое, "болото"?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C
SomeoneElse (2015-08-07 11:20:23+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343968534 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1843715253 here I think?
Vasko93 (2015-05-09 20:01:23+00:00): daw
eBin (2015-05-18 05:54:21+00:00): W jakim celu layer=2 dla mostów i relacja multipolygon z jednym członkiem dla obrysów? Sam obrys powinien być dokładniej narysowany i połączony z drogami przez niego przebiegającymi (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge).
eBin (2015-05-18 05:59:51+00:00): Tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292636467 są tagi access=no i motor_vehicle=yes co IMO oznacza, że dostęp do drogi mają tylko pojazdy silnikowe. Poza tym funkcja drogi się nie zmieniła więc nie ma potrzeby degradowania do track.
eBin (2015-05-18 06:05:36+00:00): W zestawie zmian najlepiej podawać wszystkie używane źródła bo nie wiadomo czy korzystał kolega z Binga, Geoportalu, GPX itd.
Wojciech syn Jana (c) (2015-05-18 09:18:44+00:00): Mniej krytykować a więcej robić! Trzeba było narysować samemu obrys a nie czekać aż ja to zrobię. Kolegami nie jesteśmy.
eBin (2015-05-18 17:58:06+00:00): Proszę się nie obrażać, ja tylko zwracam uwagę - do tego m.in. służą komentarze. Słowo kolega ma szersze znaczenie.
Minh Nguyen (2015-05-11 08:59:14+00:00): Good idea, though not everyone has easy access to Greek characters on their keyboards. I wonder if the Greek characters are better suited for `short_name`.

Also, Φ is phi, Τ is tau, and Θ is theta. In changeset 30993287, I took the Greek characters currently in `name` and expanded them in `alt_name`, assuming that you got the names wrong originally. But if you had the names right originally, then they should be ΔΘΔ and ΠΚΘ.
Nate Wessel (2015-05-13 14:24:52+00:00): I'm sticking with name, because the greek characters are the only actual signs on the buildings. 

Good call with the alt_names. Is there something like a tag for name:english?

I know I have one of those wrong (I think it was actually a Tau and not a Theta for one of them), but I'm on campus now so I'll check in a minute and correct it!
Nate Wessel (2015-05-13 14:41:05+00:00): I know only enough ancient greek right now to be a danger. ;-)
Minh Nguyen (2015-05-24 19:59:18+00:00): `name:en` is for English. I went with `alt_name` because these expanded names are what people would tend to search for in a geocoder like Nominatim.
Constable (2017-01-27 21:35:08+00:00): Hey Sir, what's your source of information? Via Mulino is not a public road as you mapped. It's a private road that goes through a farm but cars, bikes, pedestrians are not allowed to drive through it, and should even be unpaved.
Skippern (2015-05-10 01:59:28+00:00): Voce tem certeza que voce usando o tag certa?
Skippern (2015-05-10 02:08:53+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
tom_konda (2015-05-11 03:58:22+00:00): この編集で、のろっと南部ルートを修正されていますが、現在の大和市公式のルートガイド（ http://www.city.yamato.lg.jp/web/content/000099474.pdf ）と異なっているように思われますがなぜでしょうか。
Peter W34 (2016-03-17 00:51:10+00:00): The bridges on Marlborough Sarina Road or any other road, should not be changed to service or any thing different to what the rest of the road class is. This wrecks the routing for all the people who use OSM for in car navigation, also all roundabouts should have junction = roundabout tag.
TheOldMiner (2016-03-17 03:29:08+00:00): I am not sure who this is and what authority you have make such comments without a spread of manners,  something I intend to raise with the mailing list,  it may be a good idea to not only provide an example but discuss the issue.  There maybe a litigimate reason.
Peter W34 (2016-03-17 10:43:22+00:00): I apologize for my bluntness, I am fixing many of the errors in the map using Osmose. I was disappointed to find someone had changed these two bridges on Marlborough Sarina Road to service road, if the bridge is narrow put lane=1 instead. If you look at the history of the Funnel Creek bridge you will see what I mean. Peter
Warin61 (2017-03-20 23:38:04+00:00): Error .. confuses me! 
Relation: Develin State Forest (1481424)
Relation: Goodedulla National Park (1481425)

Are both the same! The same area should not be a national park and a state forest? Could you look at this please (I hope you are more locale than me). 
Reason why I am looking here is that both relations have the same error - they include a way Way: 104639445 and that cannot be joined into a continuous segment - so I have removed it from these relations .. that could now be made simple ways.)
TheOldMiner (2017-03-21 00:38:44+00:00): I would be careful with starting a conversation with the word Error.  I worked for the Queensland Department of Natural Resources for 6 years in the land management area. Simply, it is possible to historically have state forest, natural park, land leases and many forms of tenure coexisting in a layered arrangement inland in Queensland. Many areas exist around central queensland where I worked.  Up to you if you want to change, but I am happy with the arrangement
Warin61 (2017-03-21 06:59:41+00:00): As a NSWelshman I find the idea of an area being both a National Park and a State Forest strange in this country. However if that is the case then it should remain so in OSM. I have updated the web links for the Goodedulla_National_Park. Oh and the tag natural=forest to natural=wood as that is the present OSM tagging. 
I do note that it is not unknown for both forestry and conservation to take place in the same areas .. Europe has a few of them, then again they have 'National Parks' that have had world wars fought on them.
4rch (2015-05-11 09:13:09+00:00): Hello Thundercel, please pay more attention when you edit administrative boundaries. Please load all affected relations into JOSM when you split ways.

This changeset damaged a bunch of administrative boundaries in Columbia and Venezuela.

I've reverted this changeset to repair the damaged boundaries. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30993496
4rch (2015-05-11 13:28:18+00:00): Ok, finished. I've repaired and validated 30 administrative boundaries in Brazil, 7 in Columbia and 6 in Venezuela: http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index.php/10-osm-reports/186-countries-compare-2015-05-11
Thundercel (2015-05-11 23:52:05+00:00): Hello 4rch,
really I broke some boundarys relations when I was correcting the long ways.
When I identified this error I tried to fix all, but apparently they were fixed by reverting changeset.
SMoONF (2022-06-07 06:57:15+00:00): Bonjour Olive55,
Etant donné l'important travail de cartographie des parcelles forestières que tu as mené, je me permets de te relayer ce sujet sur le Forum OSM France, avec l'information sur le nouveau schéma d'attributs conseillés pour les parcelles forestières :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/defis-maproulette-en-foret-limites-forestieres/8894
Si tu veux te lancer dessus pour les FD de ton secteur :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-12 14:08:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344056803/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2307597 - co z tą Galerią Kamena się dzieje? Jest tam budowa?
Alanantos (2021-04-04 16:45:39+00:00): https://www.urbanity.pl/lubelskie/chelm/galeria-kamena,b7988 
Z artykułu wynika że powinna już stać od 2017 r 
Mieszkam w Chełmie, często tam przechodzę  i nic się tam nie buduje
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-04 19:03:35+00:00): A jest tam chociaż porzucony plac buodowy?
Hjart (2015-05-14 10:23:08+00:00): Oceanvej tillader kun østgående trafik?
MichaelVL (2015-05-14 14:15:59+00:00): Hej.
Nej, selvfølgelig ikke - der manglede en stump vej. Jeg har korrigeret det nu.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-10-14 07:15:03+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/451266
Chrysopras (2015-05-10 09:13:52+00:00): NB: Die Bezeichnung "Ortenaukreis" ist natürlich sehr ungenau: die Verfolgung der Element einiger (etwas fehlerhafter) Relationen hat mich in diesem Changeset durch den halben Schwarzwald geführt :-)
Hjart (2015-05-10 11:07:01+00:00): Hej og velkommen til vores projekt. Tak for bidraget.

Jeg har kigget på hvad du har lavet og tilladt mig at rette i det. Jeg har først og fremmest tagget dine liniestykker som skovveje (såvidt jeg nu kunne se at de er det) og dernæst forbundet dem korrekt (se punkt 5 i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1 for vejledning). Jeg har også justeret både dine liniestykker og bl.a. skovens omrids udfra Geodatastyrelsens fotos

Har du gps-spor som du kan uploade her: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jakob60/traces. Hvis du har kan det være en stor hjælp for os andre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-10 23:14:14+00:00): Zabrakło ulicy dla obiektów: w225791059, w225791074
Wojciech syn Jana (c) (2015-05-11 06:18:08+00:00): Poprawka: #30986174
THRA (2015-05-10 10:11:24+00:00): Der Briefkasten wird sonntags schon um 10:30 Uhr geleert.