piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2016-10-05 08:38:04+00:00): What is the meaning of all these tags on about 500 objects?
What is the source of the data? 

    Cambodia=n/a
    China=n/a
    Country=THA
    Function=ID
    Height_M=0.0
    India=n/a
    Install_Ca=n/a
    Laos=n/a
    Latitude=18.04058
    Longitude=103.609126
    Mean_annua=n/a
    Myanmar=n/a
    Notes=Google Earth visible. Other data (if any) supplied by RIB.
    Proj_Name=Nong Lerng
    Status=COMM
    Thailand=n/a
    Vietnam=n/a
Carnildo (2016-09-22 03:49:28+00:00): Why did you delete the lake here?  It was very much in existence as of May 7, 2016.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:00:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! We have attribute for website and shop. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
poornibadrinath (2016-09-22 05:20:09+00:00): Hi Артём Белоусов,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have added two jewellery shops on the same building with the same number 98. Are they one shop? In that case one POI is enough to represent that entire shop. Or are they two shops? Then why do they have same identification number. Please correct them or add names to the POI for better recognition. 
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
Supaplex (2016-09-22 09:25:31+00:00): Is this the Korean name? I'll put it in the corresponding form
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:12:19+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-09-22 06:17:27+00:00): 請問這些編號是什麼呢？如果是建築請直接加在建築上
chihchun (2016-09-22 06:21:02+00:00): 若是建築，請不要使用 place=locality
MatiasJG (2016-09-23 12:42:13+00:00): Tranquila Giorda... no vayas a saturar el mapa...
AgusQui (2016-10-03 04:00:47+00:00): ¿Saturar? ¿Alguna vez hiciste zoom en Europa?
Acá cada uno mapea cuanto y lo que quiera. 
Por cierto Matías tu única edición está incompleta, debes agregar un tag que indique qué es lo que mapeaste, sino es un nodo inútil sin entidad que no será reflejado en ningún mapa. 
Saludos.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 17:58:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Did you mean add:housenumber=16 ? Please add the street name, too!
Osm1980 (2016-11-04 13:51:01+00:00): salam lotfan az in tage name:fa da iran be hich oonvan estefadeh nakonid.choon baraye keshvaraye khareji karbord dareh na dar iran.
ba tashakor
poornibadrinath (2016-09-22 09:39:25+00:00): Hi  Manuel Primicias,
I unfortunately had to revert this entire changeset as it has 92 artworks and viewpoints added without a proper name om the map. Artworks and viewpoints are tourism tags and are used to denote a particularly famous place or a an art, like a statue or something, that denotes tourism and cultural importance. Can you please explain what were you trying to map? It would be great for you to go through OSM and Maps.me tags before you map. 
Best,
Poornima Badrinath.
literan (2016-09-22 11:34:12+00:00): А как же теперь туда повернуть? Изолят, похоже, создался...
Serguei Dukachev (2016-09-22 19:48:34+00:00): Открыли эстакаду и кусок нового шоссе. Поправил в этой правке: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42358430

Полностью маршрут мне неизвестен, так как к Воскресенскому не проезжал, но в первом приближении сделал верно. Отношения маршрутов ОТ не переделывал.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-13 17:10:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:10:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 17:52:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
keithonearth (2016-09-23 05:04:49+00:00): I'm sorry to do this again, but I've not gotten any clarification on why you're adding Thai language name (and name:hi) tags to places in India, so I've reverted this edit. 

I can't say definitively that any of these tags are inaccurate, but that camp-site looks pretty unlikely in the Bing imagery (more like a parking lot), and I have seen some nodes uploaded by you that definitely do not reflect the situation on the ground.

Please clarify what's going on with your edits.
PlaneMad (2016-10-07 15:38:53+00:00): Keith, thanks for looking into the edits, there's a block on the user now https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1056 to force them to read the messages. Is there still some cleanup to do?
keithonearth (2016-10-11 18:26:44+00:00): I reverted their edits as I came across nodes with Thai names. I was not methodical in making sure I got all of this users edits fixed, so I would think that there is still clean up to do.

Thanks for the heads-up about the user being blocked, I'm glad to hear that happened.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 18:47:36+00:00): Just to be clear, the block isn't to stop them editing, it's to alert them to the fact that they're editing a shared map :)
Hopefully they'll read the message and engage with other mappers. Unfortunately MAPS.ME doesn't make this very clear (and it's more complicated here because their phone language doesn't seem to match their native one)
keithonearth (2016-10-12 19:17:27+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse. I have a hard time believing these edits are not vandalism. Did you see my edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42477487) that removed one of their caravan sites that had been placed in the middle of an airport taxiway? 

While I did not survey that location in person,  it is a most unlikely location for a caravan site.

Locations that I did visit in person had caravan sites, or other POIs, added by this user that were non-existent in reality.

I'm not saying that more action needs to be taken at this time, but I do think we should keep a close eye on this editor.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-12 19:39:30+00:00): Well, until they login to the osm.org site to clear the message http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chalit%20Kaewjaroon/blocks they're still not able to edit the map.  Whether you'd call this "vandalism" rather depends on whether they realise they're actually updating a shared map at all.
indigomc (2016-10-24 17:12:40+00:00): Having put the Thai content into a dictionary, they seem to represent things of interest for travellers, e.g. cafe's, viewpoints, et.c.. I suspect that they are not names and actually describe the mapping feature. Until a Thai speaker can be found to check, the thing to do might be to at least remove the 'tourism=caravan_site' from all of them.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-26 20:24:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground, not things like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4412721199 . If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark, select "save" and then "edit bookmark". 
Best Regards,
Andy
jidanni (2016-09-22 07:00:32+00:00): Oops, I mean to Mr. Zhang's
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-12 07:56:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/280764866/history - have you intentionally used surface=fine_sand distinct from typical surface=sand?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsand ?
Hjart (2016-09-22 08:53:23+00:00): With fairly welldefined hamlets or villages I would prefer to remove the node.
locke (2016-09-22 11:33:59+00:00): That might be a way to tag hamlets or villages. Others prefer to put the information into a node centered in the village and not into the landuse-tag. I think both ways are equal. But it should not be tagged both a node and a landuse with the same information.
Hjart (2016-09-22 15:57:50+00:00): I agree that the information shouldn't be in both. I recently asked another contributor why it would be better to put village info on a node rather than on the perimeter, but didn't get a sensible answer. Do you have any?
locke (2016-09-23 06:47:24+00:00): No, I don't have an answer. In larger places the landuse=residential perimeter does not cover the whole place, there might be commercial areas and others belonging to the place as well. Here it is definitely better to put the information in a node. So it might be an option to put the information of all places on a node rather than a perimeter.
Hjart (2016-09-23 07:05:37+00:00): In "larger places", an option is to do what I've done for i.e. Rødding: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6533633 or Ribe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6334582. This has several advantages over using a node only: One is that the map will zoom directly to it when searching via Nominatim. Another is that we can now easily search for features in a town: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iwS. Another is that in some cases some weird issues with searching via Nominatim arre avoided. The disadvantage is that far from all contributors can be expected to understand these advanced multipolygons.
letihu (2016-12-08 20:56:47+00:00): Auch hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4412769092/history
hat die wheelmap quatsch gemacht
BCNorwich (2016-09-30 19:27:40+00:00): Hello, your hedge "way 443736827" covers the whole of the road Roud Road. Surely this cannot be correct.
BCNorwich (2016-09-30 19:44:40+00:00): Also hedge way 443736828 is mapped the same. This effectively places a barrier across the whole highway. Better to map each hedge separately. An individual hedge as a linear feature can have a width (and height) tag added thereby not needing an area drawn. For an extremely thick hedge draw a closed way around the perimeter of the individual hedge and tag it with area=yes.
dikkeknodel (2018-05-16 09:15:43+00:00): Hallo nurdafur,
Zufälligerweise hab ich gefunden das zwei deiner Campingplätze wieder gelöscht sind in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51210935. 
Weil es wertvoll für Bergsteiger ist diese Wildzeltplätze zu behalten mochte ich die wieder zurücksetzen. Ich mochte sie aber auch bereichern mit camp_type=wildcamp und eine Beschreibung, wie diese: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3759545415
Weist du noch wie gross die Plätze sind?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
Jakka (2016-09-22 19:49:22+00:00): De naamgevingen van op en afritten worden niet op deze wijze ingevoerd. Bekijk even de wiki uitleg.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link
of bekijk even een andere op en afrit zoals deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.95595122607836/3.562394693724094
Graag aanpassing van jou edit
user_5359 (2016-09-22 16:53:15+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass aus Datenschutzgründen keine persönliche Informationen vom Mieter oder Eigentümer eines Hauses eingetragen werden dürfen. Ich habe den entsprechenden Eintrag bereits gelöscht.

Laut Bing-Luftbild ist das Hauptgebäude übrigens auf der anderen Straßenseite.
MKnight (2016-09-29 12:17:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part
Allroads (2017-06-14 23:07:57+00:00): Doorgaande wegen in steden en dorpen zijn geen residential. Dat is pas echt in een woonwijk. Zo ook de Europalaan, waar vrachtauto's naar de supermarkt rijden.
Dit heeft heel veel invloed op de routering.
Niet alles is correct, dit is dan een verslechtering.
pittrichimica (2017-06-17 18:22:43+00:00): Beste Allroads, bedankt voor je opmerking en helemaal eens met de definitie minor/residential. Alleen kon ik in deze changeset de Europalaan helemaal niet vinden, wel veel andere straatjes. Die heb ik inderdaad veranderd omdat doorgaande routes niet dwars door woonwijken heen zullen lopen. Als ik niet helemaal fout zit werd de Europalaan door Futureline in 2013/2014 op residential gezet. Misschien daar aanvragen. Groeten
Allroads (2017-06-18 01:33:30+00:00): Europalaan was als voorbeeld genoemd. Verlengde van de Moerasandijviestraat.
Men is bezig met een rotonde Espelerlaan/Moerasandijviestraat.
pittrichimica (2017-06-18 14:05:09+00:00): De Moerasandijviestraat heb ik evenmin aangeraakt, zelfde mapper als boven... 
Ik zie hoewel dat het noordelijke deel Espelerlaan doorgaand is, die had ik toen veranderd, is nu terug gezet.
geri-oc (2016-09-22 15:55:52+00:00): Bitte nicht solche "falschen" Angaben eintragen.
Für eine "Anlieferungsstelle" kann die Karte geteilt und ein Marker gesetzt werden. Bei Fragen helfe ich gern per PN.
zarl (2016-09-23 05:55:59+00:00): Hallo willi927, es werden bei OSM nur Eigennamen eingetragen, im "name" hat eine Beschreibung nichts verloren. Die Funktion sollte über Schlüssel/Werte erfolgen, die du im Wiki nachsehen kannst. Ein guter Startpunkt ist am Anfang https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (von dort aber bitte den Links folgen und weiterlesen, diese Seite ist stark verkürzt und manchmal nicht ganz aktuell). 

Viel Spass weiterhin beim Mappen und eintragen von Informationen!

Hi geri-oc, deinen neuen CS-Kommentar "Blödsinn entfernen" hättest du dir bei einem neuen Mapper vielleicht sparen können. Üblicherweise zeigt man auf, wie es richtig eingetragen werden sollte, du löscht aber einfach. Letzteres erinnert mich an die Arbeitsweise zahlreicher Wichtigtuer in der deutschen Wikipedia.
zarl (2016-09-23 05:58:08+00:00): So, und jetzt muss ich geri-oc um Entschuldigung bitten, denn nicht er hat den "Blödsinn" gemacht, den ich ihm unterstellt habe.

Grüsse,
Zarl
geri-oc (2016-09-23 06:41:59+00:00): Leider hat willi927 keinen Hilfebedarf.
Hatte auch schon vorher Hilfe angeboten (siehe seine "alten" Änderungen). Ich finde es ja gut OSM als "Kommunikationsmittel" zu nutzen - dann aber bitte teilen oder uMap oder ...
zarl (2016-09-23 06:49:42+00:00): Hab mir in der Zwischenzeit auch die früheren Edits angesehen und bin etwas überfordert mit seinem "Stil". Er sollte vielleicht einfach Notes hinterlegen, als seine Hinweise so in die osm-Datenbank einzutragen.

Willi, bitte sieh dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes an.

Gruss,
Zarl
literan (2016-09-23 07:58:28+00:00): зачем вандалишь?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BohdanKuts (2016-09-22 11:56:45+00:00): Прохання повернути видалені елементи. Якщо Вам потрібні докази, що лінії з'єднані саме так - то я можу надати Вам фото.
BohdanKuts (2016-09-22 16:40:20+00:00): Перепрошую, що так наполегливо, але мені цікаво знати, чи плануєте Ви повернути видалений елемент?
olehz (2016-09-23 10:03:05+00:00): про які лінії йде мова? кінці ЛЕП біля Радехів-151? так фото би не завадили. http://test.loc/power.html#14.67/50.2966/24.6343 - там перетинались лінії 110 і 35, але фізично вони мають йти на різні трасформатори. дуже дивно...
olehz (2016-09-23 10:04:38+00:00): ой, не те посилання, ось правильне: nadoloni.com/power.html#14.67/50.2966/24.6343
BohdanKuts (2016-09-23 11:09:11+00:00): Лінк: http://www.ex.ua/947311534781
тут декілька фото та відео з того місця (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.29393/24.62773). Найкраще видно на відео, що лінії від опори ідуть в двох напрямках, так як я намалював раніше.
BohdanKuts (2016-09-26 16:01:52+00:00): Гаразд. Зважаючи на те, що виправлення Ви внесли - я файли з ексу видалив.
BohdanKuts (2016-09-26 16:02:03+00:00): Дякую.
literan (2016-09-23 07:54:20+00:00): А точно проезд под эстакадой стал двусторонним? Вот только вчера на roads.ru мечтали только об этом: http://roads.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=31318&p=306407
saintman (2016-09-23 08:33:14+00:00): Уже месяц как точно, проблема, обсуждаемая на роадс.ру в том, что с эстакады съезда туда нет, только с М.Очаковской.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
geoaria (2019-02-28 16:16:33+00:00): متاسفانه ترسیم های بدون دقت شما جای تاسف دارد. اتصال مکرر راه پیاده که بدون دقت ترسیم شده با رودخانه که آن هم به طرز بسیار بدی ترسیم شده ، بدون مشخص کردن نحوه تقاطع این دو عارضه ..  
دقت کنید که هر عارضه ای که ترسیم می کنید حتما بر روی تصاویر ماهواره ای آن یا فایل جی پی ایکس منطبق باشد و ترسیم در زوم های پایین صورت گیرد.
glglgl (2016-11-24 09:10:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte beachte, dass die Benutzung von Google-Daten für OSM-Mappingzwecke streng verboten ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:FAQ#Warum_benutzt_ihr_nicht_Google_Maps_oder_sonstwas_f.C3.BCr_eure_Daten.3F

Bitte rückgängig machen und zukünftig nicht mehr verwenden, das kan nsehr schnell zum Sperren der Nutzerkennung führen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
uolpleintslma (2016-11-02 08:57:48+00:00): - -
mavl (2019-01-13 17:11:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
andrewwiseman (2022-09-13 21:20:03+00:00): Hi, you mapped this as an "alpine hut" - what is it supposed to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4413098190#map=16/36.2783/43.9936
Alecs01 (2016-09-23 16:12:25+00:00): Reverted; please note this is already on the map, don't duplicate objects, thanks
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:01:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
eggie (2018-09-04 08:28:47+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
cadsauxk (2017-01-22 11:53:06+00:00): Oi George, obrigado por suas contribuições. Gostaria de sugerir que ao criar estradas rurais também acrescente a etiqueta surface=unpaved. É que na falta dela é assumido que se trata de estrada pavimentada.
abraço
George Silva (2017-01-23 10:26:40+00:00): Ola Gerald!

Obrigado pela dica. Sempre tento manter a consistência.

Muita coisa foi mapeada usando o iD, que é bem lento. Agora estou usando o JOSM que fica mais fácil de fazer grandes changesets.

Vou tentar corrigir isto aí.

Obrigado
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
evod (2016-09-22 16:42:52+00:00): da bist du mir doch glatt zuvorgekommen mit der bicycle_road :) (super, dass die Holochergasse auch geöffnet wurde!)
skunk (2016-09-22 18:14:55+00:00): Ups, dafür ist mir die Changeset-Message irgendwie passiert. War grad etwas gestresst.

Ja, ist super, freu mich total :-)
eggie (2017-08-08 06:51:05+00:00): Na een tijd weer aan het mappen. Ik stuur je een welkomstmail.
Startende mappers worden gevolgd in hun edits.. ook om te helpen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-09-22 17:49:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 42289201, 42288073.
aceman444 (2016-09-26 17:45:27+00:00): Vdaka za perfektne popisy sad zmien!
Pablo Más (2016-10-15 21:33:58+00:00): Hola, te hago una consulta. Vivo en Ovidio Lagos y Catamarca. Le había eliminado hace un tiempo el "Francisco" al nombre porque no figura en ninguno de los carteles de las esquinas y no encontré otra información oficial al respecto. ¿Hay algún sitio oficial donde se pueda verificar? Gracias.
Javierpf (2016-10-21 12:21:10+00:00): Hola, no me acuerdo bien. Recuerdo que estuve dibujando un parque publico ahi, por una notifica que salió en el diario de Córdoba La Voz, capaz q de ahí saqué el nombre.
Ahora q me decis que los carteles no dicen Francisco, entonces me parece me jor quitarle eso. Como hacemos? lo hago yo o lo haces vos?
Gracias por ponerte en contacto y comentarme.
Slds.
Pablo Más (2016-10-22 19:08:17+00:00): Hola y gracias por responder. Quizás sea mejor que lo hagas vos, así no queda como una serie de cambios y "contracambios". Saluos!
Javierpf (2016-10-24 12:49:02+00:00): Listo!. Revertí el cambio.
Slds.
Javier.-
GerdP (2017-08-25 13:42:04+00:00): Hi!
Please review this "roundabout" (can't see that on the sat image)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443781165
What did you try to map here?
Self-Perfection (2016-09-24 09:34:23+00:00): Эй, а building:levels?
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
Hjart (2016-09-22 18:03:35+00:00): Skjoldungestien defineres af relationen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1458788, som jeg har tilføjet denne sti (jeg har i samme omgang lavet en del andre rettelser). Et sted hvor man kan se denne og andre ruter er http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1458788. Har du iøvrigt kendskab til om stien pt er korrekt kortlagt i OSM?
mavl (2019-01-13 17:11:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:11:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:11:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
naoliv (2017-11-14 01:39:23+00:00): Hi,
What exactly is this node, please? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4413229550