piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
noelbov (2020-12-24 18:46:52+00:00): Excuse me, I didn't want to be unkind. I was rather disappointed that my days-long efforts had been partially damaged without any warning.
I appreciate your efforts to fix this, but I still have to notice some bugs, perhaps due to a less efficient editor (ID) you are using.

With regard to the walking routes (based on https://www.wandelknooppunt.be/nl/routeplanner) 
I see you have moved node 2
This yields 3 facts:
- route 2-9 misses node 2, see the table below on https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/12044543
- route 2-48 has a sorting error, see table below at https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/11959545
- the previous node 2 still belongs to the Waasland Moervaartvallei walkingroute network, see NetworkExtraMemberNode at https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/11819338/facts

With regard to the bicycle routes (based on https://www.fietsnet.be/routeplanner/default.aspx and https://www.vlaanderen-fietsland.be/nl/routeplanner) 
I see you have moved node 84, maybe because you have verified this on site (although different from the 2 last mentioned url's) 
This yields 3 facts too:
- route 84-88 misses node 84, see table below at https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/32276
- route 72-84 misses node 84 but also has a sorting error, see table below at https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/3914319
- route 82-84 has extra segments, see table below at the https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/32078

Nevertheless, I wish you a peaceful Christmas and hopeful 2021!
noelbov
CVNDMM (2020-12-27 18:38:37+00:00): Dear Noelbov, I believe we experienced the same level of frustation that day! ;-)

I finally found some time to tidy up the latest remarks.
Feel free to reconnect to me if there are still some remarks.
I also logged in the analysis tools of the Knooppuntnet, to ctrl my edits.

Please note that node 84 (rcn) has been relocated; i confirmed that also on site; i will adjust that later on.

That been said; also for you a great end-of-year and a much more interesting 2021!
eggie (2020-12-21 21:17:01+00:00): Koen,
Die node met alleen sport=soccer 'moet' weg.
De sport=   tag heb je al op de velden gezet. 
gr eggie
Carnildo (2020-12-22 07:57:32+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted a driveway here?
eggie (2020-12-21 21:14:03+00:00): Removed duplicated tagging
greetz,
eggie
seattlefyi (2020-12-22 01:50:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for the update -- this could have taken even longer to update. One suggestion, I'd suggest rather than name each building, to instead draw an area around all buildings, and tag that "landuse=residential", "residential=apartments", and "name=Cadence Apartments". This is similar to what was done for Lock Vista Apartments and Golden Sunset Apartments, nearby. Thanks again!
eggie (2020-12-21 23:03:36+00:00): Dag Sven.. In dit onderdeel zit een BUG die de fietsroutering frustreert.
Beter niet gebruiken bij eenrichtingwegen.
Issue Add whether there are cycleways
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/2310

MVG
eggie
mk2k22 (2022-08-22 11:17:31+00:00): Pozdravljeni, ali morda imate kakšen vir, kjer bi bila poimensko navedena ta pot (pot do antene)? Lp
eggie (2020-12-21 21:51:52+00:00): Dag Koert,

Je vraagt om feedback..
Je mapt highway=path  tracktype=grade4  is de specificatie van een highway=track.
Wanneer het geen track is kan die tracktype weg.
Wel kun je toevoegen  surface=???  sand , ground, dirt (zie surface tags)
Evt. smootness=bad, good, e.d ??   als je dat belangrijk vindt 

MVG,
eggie
Langlaeufer (2022-04-06 13:52:14+00:00): Hier sind Widersprüche entstanden
Bei asphalt -> grade1
bei ground/dirt/erath -> grade3..5
(Grade 5 ist quasi eine Fahrzeugspur auf  lockerem Boden)
Basstoelpel (2020-12-31 22:36:05+00:00): Hallo HelixNRW,

setz die Hausnummer doch bitte entweder an den Hausumring (was ich bevorzugen würde) oder an einen node, aber bitte nicht beides.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
HelixNRW (2021-01-02 16:34:54+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe die Adressen am Haus belassen und den Rest gelöscht.
VG
Helix
Frans S (2020-12-24 10:26:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I review your work and am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and squared.
I copy you a document with info how to improve your mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96218383
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-29 12:19:02+00:00): Bom dia João, estive olhando essa edição do prolongamento da Leste-Oeste e acredito que você tenha cometido um erro, você criou uma nova avenida no meio das residenciais que já existiam, quando me parece que o que ocorreu nas obras é que as residenciais onde passa a Leste-Oeste foram transformadas nesta. Removi as vias a mais que você criou e adicionei também as restrições de manobras que ficaram faltando, também adicionei o prolongamento da rua dos Ferroviários, por favor confira e me retorne. Obrigado.
eggie (2020-12-21 22:22:22+00:00): Beste hpieter.. Hoe kan nr 48 nu nr 56 worden op dezelfde locatie?
Waaris dan nr 48 gebleven? Waar is dan nog meer nr 56in de hoofdstraat?
Normaal wordt dan op de oude locatie de winkelinfo verwijderd en op de nieuw locatie bijgetagd.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-21 22:46:46+00:00): adres hersteld
eggie (2020-12-21 22:25:37+00:00): Beste hpieter.. maar als een winkel stopt blijft toch het adres intact.
Je hebt nu alle info van het kadaster verwijderd
Is hier de modezaak gekomen?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-21 22:46:57+00:00): adres hersteld
eggie (2020-12-21 23:04:37+00:00): Kindermode verplaatst
PT-53 (2020-12-25 07:29:14+00:00): Hallo lubaum,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887354482/history
hat keine Merkmale und überdeckt teilweise diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859443033/history
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Frohe Weihnachten
lubaum (2020-12-25 19:18:55+00:00): Danke, Peter für Deinen Hinweis. Ich hoffe es ist jetzt durch Löschung wieder richtig. Wie das hineingeraten ist, weiss ich nicht...
Bitte schaue auch andere Änderungen von mir kritisch an.
Ebenfalls Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch
mhG ludwig
PT-53 (2020-12-26 07:56:03+00:00): Hallo Ludwig,
ich habe die Linie ohne Merkmale mit dem OSM-Inspector im View Tagging) gefunden:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=8.95145&lat=47.82337&zoom=12&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways,ways_without_tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector
Schau Dir mal die verschiedenen Views durch. Dabei mußt Du aber z.B.im View Tagging Overlays wie Fixme ausschalten, sonst ist der ganze Bildschirm mit Hinweisen überdeckt.

Auch Dir noch einen guten Rutsch.
Peter
frosm (2021-01-06 18:15:43+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560750125
quel voulez-vous dire avec 1-31 ?
de 1 à 31 ?
je ne vois aucune information de ce genre sur le cadastre à cet endroit, le cadastre a l'air de dire que c'est le no 31 (ce qui je l'avoue est assez tordu comme numérotation).
Bonne continuation
Gérald PUTHON (2021-01-06 20:25:52+00:00): Bonjour,
sur le cadastre j'ai vu le 1 et le 31
j'ai trouvé cela étrange
Vers la parcelle 490 il y a le N°1
Et vers la parcelle 489 il y a le N°31
J'ai mis un "-" entre les 2 numéros. 
C'est peux être pas la bonne pratique mais quand je regarde les immeubles avec plusieurs montées c'est indiqué ainsi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-22 10:03:02+00:00): Dam Wojewódzkie Centrum Medyczne jako old_name dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231854908#map=18/50.67660/17.97651&layers=N
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:01:50+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mariotomo (2021-05-22 19:20:40+00:00): hola Federico.  estoy explorando zonas del Pacifico neotropical, con enfoque sobre los humedales y los manglares, tengo curiosidad sobre tu estilo de mapeo.  por ejemplo, Way: 887360534, que pusiste como "scrub", yo lo hubiera mapeado como wetland=mangrove, que veo que sí utilizas — detrás de la línea de costa.
mariotomo (2021-05-22 19:25:50+00:00): son problemas de etiquetaje que también tengo en Panamá, donde me enfrento con un modelo que no se adapta bien a la realidad, sin contar el renderizado que no le hará justicia.  me gustaría juntar cabezas "locales" para elaborar algo más adecuado.
mariotomo (2021-05-22 19:32:26+00:00): (entre otros detalles, el natural=shoal que dejó de ser renderizado.)
eggie (2020-12-22 07:32:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
JeroenHoek (2020-12-22 17:12:38+00:00): access=yes is niet echt nodig op parkeervlakken; dat is de standaardwaarde. Je stelt access=* meestal pas in bij beperkte toegang.
trin85_ (2020-12-22 17:18:47+00:00): Hey Jeroen, bedankt voor de comment. Ik heb deze wijziging gemaakt door een vraag te beantwoorden van StreetComplete. Denk je dat dit mogelijk een bug is in de vraagstelling?
JeroenHoek (2020-12-22 18:16:07+00:00): Ja, bij een parking=surface kan ik het me goed voorstellen (die zijn vaak access=customers), maar bij parking=street_side heb je het meestal over publiek parkeren aan openbare wegen. Daar zitten wel beperkingen op (parkeertarief etc.), maar die stel je veel beter per buurt in een keer in dan los per parkeervlak met streetcomplete.

Ik heb de bug aangemaakt: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2408
trin85_ (2020-12-22 18:33:24+00:00): Ah top, helder. Dank voor het initiatief.

Ik ben redelijk nieuw bij OSM, dus iets als StreetComplete is erg handig qua gebruiksgemak. Op zich logisch inderdaad dat bepaalde dingen beter in bulk kunnen. Zijn er daardoor ook specifieke soorten data die "zinvoller" dan anderen zijn om handmatig in te vullen met StreetComplete? Bijna alle grote straten zijn bijv. geasfalteerd en belicht, etc.
osmviborg (2020-12-22 07:29:04+00:00): This changeset is based on aerial only, no local knowledge. Changes in DK revertet.
eggie (2020-12-22 07:33:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
osmviborg (2020-12-22 07:31:04+00:00): This changeset is based on aerial only, no local knowledge. It's all wrong. Revertet.
osmviborg (2020-12-22 07:12:30+00:00): This changeset is based on aerial only, no local knowledge. It's all wrong. Revertet.
osmviborg (2020-12-22 07:24:47+00:00): This changeset is based on aerial only, no local knowledge. It's all wrong. Revertet.
ozmium (2021-05-17 18:23:38+00:00): Miért vetted le a construction-t? Továbbra sem járható, és így már megint erre tervez az osmand.
itineris (2021-05-17 18:56:46+00:00): Pontosan melyikre gondolsz?
Úgy látom, ebben a csomagban egyedül a Lidl mögött az M3 felüljáró felé vezető útról szedtem le. (Régebben ez a darab is Mogyoród útja néven futott).
Ez az út a legjobb tudomásom szerint járható, ráadásul aszfaltozott végig. Ha helyenként kicsit kátyúsan is.

Annyit lehetne még állítani rajta, hogy a Lidl felől van kint egy mindkét irányból behajtani tilos, kivéve célforgalom tábla. Azért nem raktam rá az access címkét, mert a Városkapu utca felől viszont szabad a behajtás.
ozmium (2021-05-17 19:54:04+00:00): Igen, a Lidl mögött a Metró felé vezető út. Tavaly tettem rá az építkezést, mert teljesen el volt kordonozva, egyáltalán nem lehetett behajtani. Ma megint arra akart volna vinni az osmand, de továbbra is le van szalagozva és zsákutca tábla pár méteren belül.
Nem tudom, miért gondoltad, hogy járható... Nem látok uptodate képeken mapillaryn, legközelebb  majd csinálok.
itineris (2021-05-17 20:02:27+00:00): Hmm, ez érdekes. Pontosan hol futottál kordonba?

Esetleg valamelyik közeli ingatlantulajdonos érzi úgy, hogy a "kivéve célforgalom" táblát nyomatékosítania kell, mert túl sokan használnák ezt a kézenfekvő rövidítést átmenő forgalomban?

(A címkézés is ettől függ. Ha nincs útalapig lebontva, akkor semmi esetre sem construction. A lezárás módjától függően lehet access=no, access=destination stb. Beleértve, hogy bringával vagy gyalog azért át lehet-e jutni.)
ozmium (2021-05-17 20:05:20+00:00): Most csak elmentem mellette, nem néztem meg alaposan, csak láttam kicsit bentebb egy zsáuktca táblát. Amikor ráraktam az építkezést, akkor tényeg az volt, munkagépek, sóderhalmok, minden volt ott, csak út nem.
aDSAT (2021-03-04 23:31:32+00:00): Привіт opencarpatia,

Я помітив ряд функцій `barrier = kerb`, які ви додали в Україні. Наприклад, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7929466013, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/530557023 та https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1424591013.
Мені цікаво, що ви картографуете з цими функціями? Бар'єри в OSM зазвичай використовуються для того, щоб вказати, що прохід заблокований або перешкоджаний фізичною структурою (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier). Мене турбує що `barrier = kerb` не є найбільш підходящим тегом для цієї ситуації. Чи буде тег `traffic_calming = yes` або` hazard = bump` самостійно краще підходити для цих місць? Нині маршрутизація переривається тегами `barrier = kerb` уздовж цих магістралей (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=48.4025%2C24.9278%3B48.4254%2C24.8131#map=13/ 48.4060 / 24.8632). Це був ваш намір?

Дякую!
aDSAT
Osmwithspace (2024-08-12 11:10:29+00:00): Hallo,
handelt es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703829361 um eine Pfadfindergruppe? Dann wäre das zu club=scout zu ändern. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout
Grüße Osmwithspace
ScottWalkerAU (2020-12-22 00:03:31+00:00): Can't tell which imagery you aligned to - but DCS is generally more accuarate than any of the other sources
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96221318
aharvey (2020-12-22 02:27:44+00:00): https://www.bluemts.com.au/info/towns/mt-victoria/ mentioned it as Pulpit Rock, my guess is both this one and the one overlooking Gross Valley both are known as Pulpit Rock. I checked my photos of the area and couldn't find it signposted.
radiotrefoil (2020-12-22 03:15:44+00:00): Thanks, I'll check it out in person and see if I can figure it out. Cheers
OrDal (2020-12-22 09:28:57+00:00): Hi,
Make sure you are not using copyrighted sources. The source for this changeset is copyrighted. (Yet, the changes are totally OK)
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-22 09:30:32+00:00): oh ok sure, thanks for the heads up.
Perdices (2022-12-14 01:54:32+00:00): Hola. Esa ubicación de la Parroquia Cristo Rey es errónea
rchive (2020-12-22 00:52:51+00:00): Labelled this changeset wrong. Should say "Added buildings in Colonial Park Section B". I don't know how to change it.
SCHLUMPFs (2020-12-22 04:11:37+00:00): hey korgi 
fun looking changeset boundry stretching horizontally like that.
ququruzka (2020-12-22 12:58:02+00:00): access=yes , does it mean that by default access= no \ private ?
skfd (2020-12-22 13:00:55+00:00): ето стриткомплит предложил квест и я не отказался ответить )
ma-rt-in (2020-12-23 15:51:37+00:00): Hallo,
aus welchem Grund hast du meine Änderungen wieder zurückgesetzt ohne einmal mein CS zu kommentieren?
vg
ivanbranco (2022-01-06 09:49:40+00:00): Hi ZeLonewolf,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12075123

you used place=beach instead of natural=beach here. Also this beach is inside another beach area (Second Beach), is this intended?
ZeLonewolf (2022-01-06 13:04:13+00:00): Surfer's End is the local name given to the westernmost section of Second Beach. I'm open to other ways to tag this.
BCNorwich (2020-12-24 12:31:16+00:00): Hi, You placed several sections of these highways ontop of existing highways. If a way needs correcting or amending it's OSM practice to do this to the existing way, thus saving all history and avoiding the nuisance of duplication. I think I've removed the duplications, and tagged the existing ways as foot=yes.

Regards Bernard.
Supaplex (2020-12-22 03:33:49+00:00): 有life cycle的標示方式，請不要移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96224965
Supaplex (2020-12-22 03:33:23+00:00): 並不是整塊都是建築物，原來的標示沒問題。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96225042
Glassman (2020-12-22 06:40:01+00:00): I haven't had a chance to look at your edit, but noticed that you are adding a lot of transit routes around the country. Are you working for a company associated with OTP?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96225632
andrashann (2024-01-15 22:29:38+00:00): Szia! Pusztán azért, mert (fizikailag) nem lehet gyorsan menni a szakaszon, kérlek, ne tageld maxspeed címkével. Ez ugyanis tévedés: nincs konkrét sebességkorlátozás ezeken a szakaszokon. Ez a tévedés befolyásolja a tervezőket és a térképalkalmazásokat is, amelyek mindenkire _kötelező_ limitnek veszik ezt az értékeket, így téves utazási időket jeleznek, esetleg rosszul tervezik az útvonalat.
Dimacn (2020-12-22 06:56:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я поправил ваше обозначение библиотеки: перенёс название с жилого дома на точку с тегами библиотеки (у жилого дома не может быть названия).
Дмитрий_Lioncom (2020-12-23 03:19:46+00:00): Спасибо
user_5359 (2020-12-22 05:06:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 14:41:37+00:00): Hello RoqueNublo,
It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/873403436/history was added by someone accused of fictional mapping (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11940952 ) who I'm now reverting. Can you please check that any edits that you have made have not been unduly influenced by previous fictional changes by this mapper?
Best Regards,
Andy, from the DWG
RoqueNublo (2021-03-16 17:02:10+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. The data looks fine here.
olo81 (2021-04-14 17:07:54+00:00): czy to jest teren poprzemysłowy landuse=brownfield ? 
Przecież tu jest firma która funkcjonuje.
C2oc4 (2021-04-17 08:33:47+00:00): ale nie na całym obszarze - został on wyłączony z uwagi na pozostały dekiel szybu
olo81 (2021-04-17 15:00:03+00:00): Szyb przecież był już od dawna naniesiony, sam to robiłem. 
To nie jest teren kopalni, to nie jest teren poprzemysłowy. To jest teren firmy która tam teraz funkcjonuje. 
Nie nanosimy historycznych miejsc. 
Jeśli jakieś budynki historyczne mają nową funkcję to dodaje się odpowiednie tagi o tym mówiące. 
Tak że do wywalenia.
C2oc4 (2021-04-18 09:16:40+00:00): wg mnie ww. teren nie znajduje się pod władaniem firmy o której mówisz
olo81 (2021-04-18 09:21:01+00:00): Łatwo to sprawdzić w ewidencji działek
olo81 (2021-04-18 19:02:08+00:00): i tak jak można było się spodziewać nie ma wydzielonej działki z takim terenem
C2oc4 (2021-04-21 06:00:33+00:00): k
user_11498075 (2021-02-09 04:46:39+00:00): HI BeriraLake
I hope you are doing good,
Can please let me known why you gave layer2 to the way where there is no elevation or bridge way 887418023 plz check way id is has layer tag 2
BeiraLake (2021-02-11 04:03:31+00:00): Hi ruthikdhoni, Thank you for catching this and reaching out. This layer tag was actually added by samuel_reque in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94419280. I’ve revisited this location and have now removed this layer tag.
nevw (2020-12-22 10:09:03+00:00): Hi
I reverted this edit.
You need to add your business to the building you operate from instead of a residential boundary.
You may benefit by using please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
azakh-world (2021-01-06 23:32:28+00:00): Hi. 
Please don't combine multiple railway stations into one stop_area. If there are several stations in a stop_area relation, it's impossible to determine which subway_entrance/stop_position/platform belongs to which station. All subway networks in the world are mapped with "one station per stop_area" rule along with stop_area_group concept for transfers.
Best regards, 
Alexey
skquinn (2020-12-22 11:19:27+00:00): Why does this changeset bounding box cover almost the entire continental US, all of Central America, a good chunk of South America, at least half of Africa, etc?
indianajoe (2020-12-22 15:59:50+00:00): Possibly because way 887429145 is crab fishing in the remote North Pacific.
user_5359 (2020-12-22 21:36:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363153251: What is the meaning of the key DownloadManager?
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-12-23 07:09:31+00:00): Hi. I have no idea how it got there. Probably an accidental copy/paste. Removed.
Jakka (2020-12-23 10:03:10+00:00): adding on this path "bicycle=no" means that it is forbidden ??? Is it ? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
Jakka (2020-12-23 10:04:57+00:00): ou ce n'est pas un path mais "footway" ?
Sriosm (2020-12-22 09:23:27+00:00): I uploaded Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) instead of Bing aerial imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96239375
mbeyerle (2021-01-07 18:37:53+00:00): Hi! Was hoping to discuss this edit -- Many mappers have mapped the roads at PSU in great granularity and bus lanes have not been added because they're really an extension of the road, and not separate ways. May I suggest you remove these separate lanes and add tags to Curtin road (in the corresponding areas) indicating the existence of a bus lane? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_lanes
eggie (2020-12-22 09:31:46+00:00): Dag Retyp,

-tracktype lijkt me oke bij gras..
- De regels over oneway kunnen helemaal weg.
oneway=no taggen we bv bij parallelfietspaden als het tweerichting is om te voorkomen dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen.
oneway:bicycle=no kan nu ook weer weg.
Mvg
eggie
skyper (2021-04-05 23:00:17+00:00): Hey

Hast Du absichtlich zwei stop_positionen in Staufen Süd angelegt. Haben genau die identischen Tags und sieht eher nach einem Fehler aus?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301453492
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301453501

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-02-18 13:30:28+00:00): Schade, dass ich keine Antwort bekommen habe.
Habe die stop_position jetzt als einen Knoten in die Mitte verlegt. `railway:position` war an beiden Stellen falsch.
Grüße skyper
eggie (2020-12-22 09:47:02+00:00): Dag 2-B  heb beste kun je bijtaggen op de bestaande adresdresnode.
Dan is adres en instelling gekoppeld.
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-12-22 12:56:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
4004 (2021-01-04 02:14:42+00:00): но аншлаг по панорамам там 3, а не 3б?
VitoScaletta (2021-01-04 13:58:01+00:00): Друзья были рядом, сказали так именно))
4004 (2021-01-04 14:00:23+00:00): если бы друзья еще в мапиллари снимали, цены бы им не было. повесил пока fixme