piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
spatialia (2022-08-03 22:00:50+00:00): Just adding a note for anyone else that reviews this that the added crosswalk appears on Maxar imagery and looks like a somewhat recent addition.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124369585
Austrianton (2022-08-12 18:08:37+00:00): Das wäre vielleicht auch in mehreren lokalen Changesets möglich gewesen. Schätze einmal, dass sich da irgendwo in JOSM eine weit entfernte Modifikation eingeschlichen hat.
Diacritic (2022-08-03 07:47:02+00:00): Hello,

VEhicles are not permitted to turn left from the main Nepean Hwy carriageway into the carpark at this point. There is a "No Left Turn" sign at that location accordingly. Traffic must use the service road.

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124369740
l7777777b (2022-08-03 07:59:53+00:00): Hi, i was following the google map route to make sure osm generate the same route as possible, but seems google got it wrong, so thanks for correction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124369740
Diacritic (2022-08-03 08:24:12+00:00): No problems at all.

I would strongly caution you against using Google’s, or any other private companies, data or services when contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Google places stringent conditions for their data in their license, which makes Google data (including maps, routing, street view, etc) incompatible with OSM’s data license. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google.

I’m happy to answer any questions you may have regarding licensing.

Dian
ikopanjirukmana (2022-08-03 02:56:00+00:00): Hi baihq, salam kenal.
saya melihat pada changeset ini https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124369764
bahwa anda telah menghapus landuse construction bandara kediri. saya memang bukan warga lokal tetapi pada citra yang saya lihat memang ada pembangunan. apa bisa dijelas kenapa tidak pas?
Terima kasih
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-02 05:51:11+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk (2022-08-05 08:28:35+00:00): DWG fix, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124509607
Udarian (2022-08-02 03:37:33+00:00): my bad I added grass along turnpike from Southwest 248th Street to Old Cutler Road along with a few trees and a noise barrier
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 09:37:44+00:00): 脑斧辛苦了，下次去还坐这车玩
φ(゜▽゜*)♪
archie (2022-08-02 05:08:20+00:00): Hej, du har taggat den här vägen som privat och angivit som skäl att du vill uppnå ett visst syfte nämligen  routingändamål. Av NVDB framgår att vägen ingår i "bilnät" samt att inga körförbud gäller för den här vägen. 
Jag kan därför inte se några skäl att tagga vägen som "privat" (jag har förresten - provisoriskt, i avvaktan på ditt svar - taggat om till motor_vehicle=destination, eftersom det ligger en del bebyggelse längs vägen). 
Hur ligger det till med detta egentligen?
archie (2022-08-02 06:13:28+00:00): Tagit bort begränsningen. Enl NVDB ingår hela vägsträckan i bilnät. Längs sträckan ligger bebyggelse, museum. Du angav i kommentaren inte att access-begränsning finns utan att du ville uppnå visst routingändamål.
archie (2022-08-04 11:20:12+00:00): Hej, skulle du vilja sätta in taggen "motor_vehicle=permit" på det avsnittet av vägen som det här gäller, tack! Det är efter skyltningen på vägen direkt efter busshållplatsvägen (https://www.google.com/maps/@57.7555707,12.2880594,3a,75y,104.35h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSfk-Ck2WCQ31PHug_I5uSA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=sv). Jag vet bara inte hur långt det här förbudet gäller, men du har förmodligen lokalkännedom. Stort tack!
DaveF (2022-08-02 11:31:31+00:00): There isn't the connectivity to the cycleway. Please revert.
https://snipboard.io/9x8kbq.jpg
Swihail (2022-08-04 07:07:49+00:00): Hi  DaveF, Thanks for providing a source, I have reverted the edit.
Diacritic (2022-08-03 07:56:24+00:00): Hello,

Your contributions are public. Please do not contribute Group names and regions that are only specific to your editing groups.

Dian.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124371657
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Supaplex (2022-08-03 06:39:58+00:00): i郵箱應該是放在外面，24小時都可以用吧?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124373004
custodio trindade dos santos (2022-08-02 05:46:38+00:00): saya harus belajar lebih baik lagi  karaena leptop saya kurang baik
custodio trindade dos santos (2022-08-02 05:49:20+00:00): saya belajar lebih baik lagi
b-jazz (2022-08-03 15:02:21+00:00): There are some OSM Q/A tools that don't like it when two nodes share the same exact lat/long coordinates. One case of that was pointed out recently with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9926139654 being one of the nodes. Is it possible to separate these two nodes by some minute distance? Thanks.
BubbaJuice (2022-08-03 15:05:34+00:00): I'm sorry that happens. It is just a matter of the fact that the switches in this case are right on top of each other. Perhaps I am missing a layer that would be helpful in this case. Is that the correct solution to this?
b-jazz (2022-08-03 15:23:45+00:00): Since you are using a tiny node on a physical object that has non-trivial width and length, maybe it would be okay to separate them a few inches. The nodes would still represent the location of the objects correctly and would keep the Q/A tools from alarming. I don't think putting them on different layers or levels would quiet the tool, but I haven't explored that in depth.
BubbaJuice (2022-08-03 15:29:54+00:00): Separating them by a few inches removes the fact that they are above each other and on the same structure. I will not be doing that. If you link me to the Q/A tool I can add appropriate layers to the items. If that does not solve it, it's the Q/A tool's fault.
b-jazz (2022-08-04 14:53:52+00:00): Which node should be on top?
BubbaJuice (2022-08-14 16:39:59+00:00): Sorry for leaving you hanging. Depends on the structure. I can fix them for you if you link me the Q/A tool.
b-jazz (2022-08-16 19:58:58+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-96.50673&lat=36.25733&zoom=4&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
BubbaJuice (2022-08-16 20:00:54+00:00): Thanks. I'll fix it soon.
user_8101879 (2022-08-02 15:13:56+00:00): Hi,

the relations 14412456, 14412457, 14412458 and 14412459 are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

It seems you have an old version of JOSM. This editor has been improved and the last version will help you to prevent to create a new empty relation. Maybe you could update JOSM ?

Best regards
volla_la (2022-08-04 08:20:05+00:00): Hi Fred73000, thank you for notifying me, I have fixed the empty relations which you have mentioned. I will update my JOSM to avoid it. Happy Mapping!
mtmail (2022-08-15 13:50:43+00:00): Ist bei dem linken/westlichen Gebäude die Hausnummer eventuell nur 51 statt 51-63? Die Postleitzahl ist vermutlich auch nicht die richtige bei dem Gebäude.
bielebog (2022-08-15 20:43:53+00:00): Gut gesehen, danke. Ist nun gefixt.
user_8101879 (2022-08-02 15:21:06+00:00): Hi,

the relations 14413013 (and 14413685 in another changeset) are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

It seems you have an old version of JOSM. This editor has been improved and the last version will help you to prevent to create a new empty relation. Maybe you could update JOSM ?

Best regards
4004 (2022-08-07 23:10:03+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
только инстаграм поправлю - там нужен только юзернейм
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-16 15:17:04+00:00): سلام، ضمن خسته نباشید
از ابتدای خیابان دادگستری تا چهارراه امام خمینی، خط ویژه اتوبوس ایجاد کرده‌اید. با اینکه رفت و برگشت این مسیر به وسیله جداکننده ترافیکی (نیوجرسی) مجزا شده اما محدودیتی برای نوع خودروهای عبوری وجود ندارد و صرفا جهت تک لاینه کردن مسیر به سمت چهارراه ورزش، نصب گردیده.
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-16 15:46:12+00:00): دوست عزیز، علیرغم تصاویر مپیلاری و توضیحاتی که بارها به هر کدام از کاربران ویرایش کننده این مسیر دادم، باز هم تقاطع مدرس 6 به چهارراه راه ورزش را تغییر داده‌اید، برای بار هزارم عرض می‌کنم این مسیر محدودیت ترافیکی دارد به همین خاطر به شکلی که دیده بودید ثبت کرده‌ام.
خواهشا، خواهشا به انتهای مدرس 6 دست نزنید.
andi9876 (2022-08-03 18:08:29+00:00): Hallo.

https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/images/intersection-modeling/3way_bidir_and_dual_carriageway_intersection_single_point.png

I guess before was right. Reverted.
Andi.
Josefstadt (2022-08-08 06:17:17+00:00): Hi andi9876, thanks for pointing this out & reverting the junction. Hope you have a great day!
ftcat (2022-08-02 09:49:29+00:00): Hi  Chabota Munachoonga,

Before adding 'localities' please check whether there is a town or village already on the OSM map with the same name and if so don't add the locality. As per the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality?uselang=en-GB), a locality is an unpopulated place so a general area not somewhere like Chisamba or Liteta which are towns. I suspect you are mapping constituencies and your source is the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ). I do not think it is a good thing to map constituencies as they will change and are particularly hard to map the proper boundaries, in any case the tag locality doe not accurately represent the data you are mapping.

From my knowledge Chisamba and Liteta are towns and are on the map and both Miswa and Chikonkomene are railway sidings with residential areas with those names already mapped.
Chabota Munachoonga (2023-06-11 06:47:30+00:00): Hi, 
your point is well noted but you will notice that most localities in the rural set up will bare the ward named, this is some we really discussed with the team before doing the mapping but we shall consider some of the points you raised
ftcat (2023-06-11 08:53:34+00:00): Hi,

I appreciate you taking note of this. Wards are political subdivisions of constituencies so the tag of locality does not accurately represent the data you are trying to tag.

If you refer to the Wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality?uselang=en-GB, you will see that the tag locality should be used for an area that is not a town or actual physical place but has a name that refers to it. An example I can think of is Katuba on the Great North Road, there is no town there called Katuba, there is a Katuba river but the area around this river along the Great North Road is called Katuba and the toll plaza there is called the Katuba Toll Plaza so Katuba is a locality, the ward names are derived from the locality names in rural areas, while in towns and cities they are derived from suburbs. Another example would be Landless Corner, there is no town by that name, the name refers to the junction of the Old Mumbwa Road and the Great North Road and gets its name from the Landless family who have owned the farm at this junction from the early 1900s. The area is now known as Landless Corner and so the tag locality fits this area.

I would not recommend adding ward names to the map as they are political administrative divisions  and should be mapped as a boundary and so difficult to map as they can change over time. They are similar to parishes in countries like the UK, which originated from the original church administrative regions and are the smallest local government subdivision.

Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
literan (2022-08-02 18:16:24+00:00): добрый день!

для подъездов есть более точный тег - entrance=staircase

исправлю тут
chris66 (2023-04-07 17:01:54+00:00): Ich glaube die PLZ an den Gebäuden hier in der Große Heimstraße sind alle falsch.
DeBigC (2022-12-21 21:50:07+00:00): Please review the track marked here, I think I see lines which are powerlines, not vehicle ruts (if that's what you were assuming)
b-unicycling (2022-12-22 13:15:58+00:00): I see what you mean. there were tracks on Esri, but maybe they were made by ESB when they put in the power poles...
JeroenvanderGun (2022-08-31 14:54:11+00:00): Hi,

I reverted your changes to the tagging of the Caribbean Netherlands (boundary=administrative, admin_level=3). Despite the ISO country code, this is not an administrative entity. This area has joint laws (see related_law) but no joint administration.

See the OSM wiki for how the Kingdom of the Netherlands is structured in OSM (note how admin_level=3 is already in use for the countries within the Kingdom, in this case The Netherlands):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Koninkrijk_der_Nederlanden#Structuur_van_het_Koninkrijk
somix (2022-08-02 08:32:30+00:00): Hello, theatre:type=amphi is used when the audience is seated around the stage, for open-air theatres like this one, use theatre:type=open_air
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
DP24PH (2022-08-02 09:57:50+00:00): ALERT: You might need to personally survey those areas in Baguio City where the post-M7 Luzon quake has occurred, affecting most buildings.


DP24
Akkurator (2022-09-26 22:55:13+00:00): Hallo traxs,
du hast hier einen Teil der Gerberstraße als unbeleuchtet getaggt (lit=no). War das ein Versehen? M.W. ist die Straße die ganze Nacht beleuchtet, es sind sogar die Laternen in OSM eingezeichnet, z.B. diese: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7540724777
Ebenso ist m.W. der Weg zum Eingang von Nr. 12 ebenfalls beleuchtet, per Lichtschalter.
Wäre nett, wenn du das korrigieren könntest oder erläutern, warum du das anders siehst.
Viele Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2022-09-26 23:01:10+00:00): Anmerkung noch zum Fußweg Nr. 12:
dessen surface ist eher nicht fine_gravel (befestiger Splitt), sondern gravel oder pebblestone (es sind runde Kiesel).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dfine_gravel
Akkurator (2022-10-03 10:11:51+00:00): Nochmal vor Ort nachgeschaut, da hier keine Antwort kam:
im fraglichen Bereich der Gerberstr. gibt es 2 Straßenlampen, die die ganze Nacht an sind und auch funktionieren.
Der "Fußweg" hinter Nr. 12 ist eine Mischung aus Kies, Steinplatten und Gras und es gibt einen Lichtschalter an der Hauswand (den würde ich persönlich gar nicht so detailliert taggen, weil er nur zu einem privaten Hauseingang führt - aber wenn schon, dann auch korrekt).

Ich korrigiere das entsprechend.
Akkurator (2022-10-03 10:16:00+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126928246
Syl (2022-08-02 13:23:18+00:00): Bonjour, le téléphone de la cabine marche toujours ?
Jerome-Herbinet (2022-08-02 13:46:45+00:00): Bonjour, aucune idée, il faut que je vérifie à l'occasion.
Syl (2022-08-02 19:55:54+00:00): Ok, si besoin il existe un tag si la cabine existe mais sans forcément un téléphone fonctionnel : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtelephone_box
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
GPar (2022-08-04 21:06:00+00:00): Ciao, hai taggato quest'area boschiva come highway: 324614602 , c'è un errore
Andrea Santorio (2022-08-05 06:54:11+00:00): Grazie, non me n'ero reso conto.
Tilia_J (2022-08-02 14:12:25+00:00): Goedemiddag, zou je dat fietspad bij Rijnstate weer willen terugleggen zoals het was?

Je hebt hem correct neergelegd op de tijdelijke omlegging ivm bouwplaats, echter is volgens de meest actuele PDOK luchtfoto (Quick Ortho) de bouwplaats opgeheven, alle wegen en paden hersteld zoals het eerder was en het gras opnieuw ingezaaid.

Jouw PDOK Actueel Ortho HR is niet zo actueel als de naam doet vermoeden.

Zie:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=862367#p862367

Daarnaast - nogmaals - het dringende advies om, aangezien je zaken aan het rechtleggen bent, aandacht te besteden aan welke achtergronden je gebruikt.

Ik kan je aanraden om ipv ID de JOSM editor te gebruiken waar het toevoegen van achtergronden een stuk flexibeler is:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66737

- Satelliet / luchtfoto voor landuse, etc
- Actueel Hoogtebestand voor natuurgebieden
- BGT voor wegen (controleer altijd met Actueel Hoogtebestand, heeft afwijking tot 7,5m)
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2023-01-10 07:34:05+00:00): Hello, lorenzo23622. Hope you doing well.
I'm doing remote mapping to validate railway network in Indonesia.
I found an issue about layer tags in the railway. I wanna ask you about this railway and railway=level_crossing (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9926492166) From this page, I found out that you were the author of this railway, and you added tag layer=1 (it should combination with bridge, as far as I know) and share nodes railway=level_crossing with the highway that have different layer. Do you have any idea or local knowledge to fix this issue? Please let me know if you have.
Happy Mapping :)
Ewen Hill (2022-11-09 09:51:01+00:00): Thanks Milk Point for updating this. Rode this section and confirmed it (apart from the grumpy security guard at the barriers)
DiahW IRM-ED (2023-01-11 05:57:46+00:00): Hi, lorenzo23622.

Thank you for adding data to OSM! Previously, I want to apologize and need your confirmation to validate the existing rail network.

I saw in the changeset history, you added tag "layer=1" to this railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1083140986)

I'm not sure this railway actually has a different layer or not, because there was already tag "railway=level_crossing" at this point (-7.6141246, 109.3665482)(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6559390170)

I thought maybe you accidentally added tag "layer=1" when adding the bridge tag. So I need to confirm, do you have any information or local knowledge about this issue? I really appreciate any information and advice you provide. Thank you

Regards,
Diah
pitfire (2022-08-02 14:12:48+00:00): Hallo IsAlexReal,
hier fehlt das Gebäude!
"Diakoniestation Windeck (266694851, v3)"
zorglubu (2022-08-02 13:38:33+00:00): Bonjour,

et bienvenue sur openStreetMap !
Ne s'agirait-il pas d'un abreuvoir comme ceci :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dwatering_place
?
"foutain" en anglais indique plutôt quelque chose de décoratif. Merci.
chris66 (2023-10-20 11:17:01+00:00): Sicher , dass die Straße "Im Winkel" einen Radweg hat? 

Auf dem Satbild ist keiner zu sehen.

Grüße
osmdees (2022-08-31 18:09:28+00:00): Hey, was ist deine Quelle des Straßennamens "Route des Gorges de Nouailles"? LG
Wookey (2022-08-31 18:43:53+00:00): There was a sign on the building giving that as the address.
Wookey (2022-08-31 18:47:19+00:00): Ah no. I see what you mean. The gorge de nouailles is in France at Moutier Haute-pierre.,a place I also visited on this trip (probably the day before I got to Donauschingen) So that's not right for this wier on the Donau. Not sure what happened there. Cut-and paste error in vespucci, I suppose. Feel free to fix it.
osmdees (2022-08-31 18:48:45+00:00): Thank you!
jleedev (2022-08-03 23:50:11+00:00): I really don't understand the point of including hospitals, churches, parks, schools, and stores in a "residential" landuse.
chris66 (2023-12-06 12:43:48+00:00): Hi,
warum foot=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34037460

Grüße
GerdP (2023-12-06 12:48:43+00:00): Gute Frage! Ich habe es nicht gesetzt, aber auch nicht geändert. Werde mal schauen, ob ich Fotos dazu habe.
GerdP (2023-12-06 14:17:43+00:00): Fotos habe ich keine, gewesen bin ich auch noch nie auf dem Weg. Werde in den nächsten Tagen mal da vorbeiradeln. Die Beschilderung an den Ahlhorner Fischteichen ist aber eh fragwürdig. Viele VZ250 ohne Radfahrer frei, auch auf den ausgeschilderten Radrouten.
GerdP (2023-12-06 14:26:33+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101559714 
"Naturschutzgebiet. Eingeschränkte Nutzung von Wegen. " Frage ist, warum dort Radeln erlaubt sein soll.
GerdP (2023-12-10 15:35:05+00:00): War heute da, ist wie befürchtet: Die Beschilderung für Fahrzeuge ist mehr oder weniger willkürlich, aber Wandern wird nirgendwo verboten.
Eigentlich typische Waldwegbeschilderung...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144968643
felipeeugenio (2022-08-04 13:19:40+00:00): Hello. We talked about this. why again? leave the names alone, please. that is why you are being tracked on every single edit you do in Chile. This is not a wiki resolution, this is only for your commercial purposes, please refrain of doing these edits and don´t use the "is not allowed" phrase. It is simply not true.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124382845
stadiaarcadia (2022-08-05 14:52:11+00:00): Hi, why are there two stadium names? The official name of the stadium is just "Estadio Monumental".
felipeeugenio (2022-08-05 14:55:39+00:00): Hi. You are missing the point here. You deleted one name stating that it wasn´t allowed. which is not only false; is not doing the proper research.

Answering your question. I´ll search for the correct name later.

Please refrain from this kind of editions.

thanks
stadiaarcadia (2022-08-19 18:46:05+00:00): The actual playing field is named after David Arellano, the founder of Colo-Colo; therefore, on occasions the whole stadium is referred to as Estadio Monumental David Arellano. The real name of the stadium is Estadio Monumental. This might be a good solution: Name the football pitch "David Arellano" and the stadium "Estadio Monumental".
AndersAndersson (2022-08-02 22:19:13+00:00): Hej!
OpenStreetMap är inte ett ställe att spara sin campingplanering.
Finns campingställena på riktigt så döp dom till det dom heter eller ta bort namnet. Är det bara platser där du tänkt sova så ta bort dom dom helt.
archie (2022-08-02 22:47:36+00:00): OSM är inte till för personliga POI. Vänligen slet allt dette! Du bör välja det här istället: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/da/
archie (2022-08-03 09:28:56+00:00): Reverted by cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124426650
AndersAndersson (2022-08-02 22:19:03+00:00): Hej!
OpenStreetMap är inte ett ställe att spara sin campingplanering.
Finns campingställena på riktigt så döp dom till det dom heter eller ta bort namnet. Är det bara platser där du tänkt sova så ta bort dom dom helt.