piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
filoart (2022-10-17 18:37:36+00:00): Ok, sorry to make a mistake. Im' pretty new to edit maps and I'm setting routes for komoot as a free lance. It seems that isn't allowed to acces in this track but I did it by bike recently and there aren't "no acces signals" or similar... How can I fix the mistake? thanks in advance, Alberto
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-18 06:40:05+00:00): I believe the problem is in the app you are using. There is no problem with this track. See: https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=15/45.0962/8.2811/standard&lonlats=8.282833,45.100275;8.275023,45.093823 BR, Andrea
eggie (2022-10-17 12:58:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM   In OSM taggen we bij op de BAG adresnode.
Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Ik probeerde wat samen te voegen, maar dat gaf een conflict. Waarschijnleijk ben je zelf nog bezig
Overigens is Parallelbaan 8 niet in dit pand volgens de BGT..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-17 13:05:27+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode 9
Colin Smale (2022-10-17 13:56:16+00:00): Hi Billy... I am not convinced Sealand should have any kind of admin boundary as it is not recognised by anyone except its own inhabitant(s). But it should most definitely not be at admin_level=1!!! Normal sovereign countries are at admin_level=2, and level 1 is kind of "reserved" for supranational administrations if they ever become hierarchically superior to sovereign states.
tux67 (2022-10-17 14:50:38+00:00): Hi, ich weiss nicht ob du den ALKIS Layer für iD als overlay kennst - aber wenn du magst, dann kannst du https://www.wms.nrw.de/geobasis/wms_nw_alkis?BBOX={bbox}&FORMAT=image/png&HEIGHT={height}&LAYERS=adv_alkis_gebaeude&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&SRS={proj}&STYLES=&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&WIDTH={width}  als benutzerdefinierte Bildmaterialquelle in iD eingeben um zu sehen, warum das Radgeschäft 2 Gebäudeteile waren. Macht natürlich Sinn das zu mergen, wenn es sich heute vor Ort als eines darstellt. btw. gibts den 2 Radladen dahinter auch noch?
eggie (2022-10-17 13:00:37+00:00): Svp geen adressen toevoegenb in OSM.. Bedrijven bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode samen met een office=??  company tag.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-17 13:13:25+00:00): Info overgezet naar adresnode.. source BAG hersteld

MVG
eggie
laurent-38 (2022-10-17 13:36:14+00:00): J'ai oublié de mettre les bonnes sources dans ce changeset… Il y avait :
- une sortie sur place
- des images aériennes (OrthoHR 2020 et 2017)
- des imageries de rue (Bing)
- BD Volta (Enedis)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
MxxCon (2022-10-18 04:36:42+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you can NOT use data from Google Maps to add to OSM. It is considered copyright violation!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127671286
Lejun (2022-10-18 10:05:28+00:00): J’suis pas sur de comprendre, c’est une piste cyclable à travers champs qui commence de part et d’autre mais sans connexion au milieu ?
Maxime Lema (2022-10-18 12:44:59+00:00): oui c'est exactement ca, c'est une sorte de mini chemin entre 2 champs et qui fini par atterrir sur un fossé puis de l'autre coté du fossé il y a un autre champs. De l'autre coté on arrive également sur le champs.
Lejun (2022-10-18 15:53:47+00:00): « mini-chemin », donc pas un aménagement cyclable officiel ? Peut être qu’il faudrait remplacer la valeur de `highway` par `path`[1] ou `track`[2] selon si y a la place qu’un 4 roues passe.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Maxime Lema (2022-10-18 19:03:44+00:00): j'ai repris ce qui existait auparavant mais en effet ca serait plutôt track du coup
eggie (2022-10-17 13:11:11+00:00): Kleine wijziging.. Aangepast naar adresnode
felipeeugenio (2022-10-17 14:16:36+00:00): Estimada. Por favor escribir con mayúsculas y minúsculas como corresponde.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-10-17 14:43:34+00:00): No se ve nada en la foto satelital. Segura que queda ahí?
SekeRob (2023-06-28 08:45:19+00:00): Hi,

Hai mappato in 2022 un'area di costruzione e una linea. Che cos 'era questo? Sembra un metanodotto o altri. Il terreno ora nuovamente richiuso, niente sul superficie.

grazie
kolasau (2022-10-17 13:06:39+00:00): right tag is #mapbox_linters_brazil
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:33:28+00:00): Ciao. Parte del sentiero 6 era già stata inserita nella relazione 2780436. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-25 09:46:42+00:00): Ciao, giusto, ho ora unificato le due relazioni e tolto il duplicato, grazie!
Lejun (2022-10-18 09:41:27+00:00): C’est gentil d’avoir essayé mais la gare routière est déjà indiquée[1]. Je me suis chargé de la correction, la manipulation est relativement complexe dans une zone aussi dense. Peut-être t’attaquer à des trucs plus simples pour commencer ?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10110929162/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127672651
felipeeugenio (2022-10-17 14:20:42+00:00): Hola. Una cosa es el nombre oficial, que ese lleno de guiones y otro es como se llama en terreno. Usted escribió algo que parece un poco dificil de creer. Está bien?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127672728
felipeeugenio (2022-10-17 14:31:23+00:00): Hola. revisando la página del MOP, ese camino tenía el rol L-617, pero ya no. Sigue teniando el nombre técnico de "Huaso Chileno - El Progreso". saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127672728
felipeeugenio (2022-10-17 14:31:49+00:00): voy a agregarlo como nombre alternativo, si es que acaso es conocido asó todavía. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127672728
jptolosa (2022-10-17 17:55:46+00:00): Hola, el que sean "avenidas" no los convierte en motivo para ser calles secundarias, calles cuya función más elevada consiste en servir de ingreso a un sector residencial debieran ser calles terciarias. No se justifica el cambio en este caso. Para ser secundarias en lo posible deben conectar sectores más distantes de la ciudad.
Saludos.
rlaracol (2022-10-17 18:30:47+00:00): bajo tu punto de vista, no tiene sentido por ejemplo que sean Secundarias vías como Sta Inés o San Antonio, que también son accesos a zonas residenciales o suburbios de la comuna. No es primera vez que veo que estas avenidas (las que edité) que son denominadas como tal en otras plataformas sig. Es posible que quizás el caso de Valle Volcanes pudiera ser terciaria, pero Av. Austral, Puntiagudo y Sgto Silva si tiene sentido, ya que conectan sectores residenciales y son alternativa para Alerce.
jptolosa (2022-10-17 19:36:59+00:00): Santa Inés puede ser terciaria o secundaria, según veo desde acá sirve como alternativa a Salvador Allende. Avenida Austral si sirve como alternativa para ir a Alerce puede ser secundaria. En Valle Volcanes bajo ningún punto de vista creo yo se justifica tu edición a secundario, ya que esas calles solo son importantes para ese barrio en específico.
rlaracol (2022-10-17 19:42:50+00:00): De acuerdo. Pero pese a eso, considero que se puede considerar en ese caso Avda Marcelo Fourcade,  Cerro tronador, Volcan Michimavida y Nueva Dos, para acceder desde bajo el viaducto a Camino a Alerce. De todos modos editaré a terciarias las vias de Valle Volcanes
jptolosa (2022-10-17 20:28:40+00:00): Ok gracias, el tramo de Fourcade hasta Cuarta Terraza, y desde está última hasta Av Ferrocarril creo que ya estaba como secundaria, lo cual me parece correcto.
essich (2023-12-24 14:36:40+00:00): Woher kommt der Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10108719710 und dessen ref:IFOPT? 

An dieser Stelle (südlich des Parkplatzes) ist nichts und war m.W. nie ein Haltestelle. Seit der Umgestaltung 2021 oder 2022 gibt es an der Ostseite des Parkplatzes ein dedizierte Busspur und etwas, das man als Wartebereich bezeichnen könnte.
user_5359 (2022-10-17 16:43:25+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Was für eine Geschäft ist denn die Body Factory Solingen? Name den Namen würde ich auf ein Fitness-Center https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre tippen.
ElliottPlack (2022-10-25 00:42:15+00:00): Hey there, looks like you dropped the name from the trail. Was that intentional? Although the name of the trail is also on the relation, it is still appropriate and conventional to add the name of the trail to the path itself, as many viewers (and editors) do not see the relations or understand them.
Sparks (2024-03-09 05:02:13+00:00): I don't think this was intentional.  Why am I getting blocked for this now?  Never saw this message.
highflyer74 (2022-10-18 19:13:18+00:00): Hello!

Please do not add useless nodes on straight ways and keep things rectangular. In addition there was a duplicate node here.

Thank you!
dtbhavan (2022-10-19 04:36:00+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. It's an honest mistake from my end. Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again.Thanks once again for fixing the issue, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
dtbhavan
LockOnGuy (2022-10-19 13:11:27+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, why did you change the name:ar for 2479377409 from "زرواو" to "زیرواو"? The old one was correct and in Arabic but you changed it to Kurdish. Please don't do that and revert this change.
ڕاستی (2022-10-19 18:38:09+00:00): ناوە ئینگلیزی و کوردییەکە درووستەکەیە name:eng و name:ku.
لەسەر ئەو بنەمایە چاکراوەتەوە. چونکە دیارە کە وەرگرتنی ناوەکان لەسەر بنەمای ناوی شوێنەکەیە بە شێوازی نووسینی ئەو زمانە. ئەگەریش بەڵگەیەکت لەبەر دەستە کە بیسەلمێنی کە هەڵەیە فەرموو بیخەڕوو.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127675148
LockOnGuy (2022-10-19 18:42:26+00:00): No! You can not edit name:ar based on kurdish names! The one was before was correct, I read and speak Arabic and I know you made it in Kurdish instead of Arabic. This is totally wrong, revert the name to Arabic please for name:ar.
ڕاستی (2022-10-19 19:00:59+00:00): name: زێرواو
name: زیرواو
ئەوانە وەکی یەکن؟
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127675148
ڕاستی (2022-10-19 19:01:33+00:00): پاشان ناوەکە بەخۆی کوردییە ئەدی دەتەوێ لەسەر چ بنەمایەکی ناوی لێبندرێ؟
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127675148
LockOnGuy (2022-10-19 19:09:31+00:00): Yes you made it the same as kurdish but you typed it with the Arabic letter which is wrong. For example if you want to type English, you need to type it as English in the English language not as Espanish with English letters and say because the original name was espanish etc..
Name:ar is for Arabic, and should only be in Arabic, the Arabic the Arab people speak and read.      
Same thing for Erbil, in Arabic and every other language its called Erbil but in Kurdish its called Hawler.      
Therefore do not change any names based on another language.    
Revert name:ar to name:ar= زراوة    
Are you gonna revert your edit or not?
ڕاستی (2022-10-19 20:52:01+00:00): باشە دەتوانی پێم بڵێی ئەم وشەیە لە زمانی عارەبی چۆن دەخوێندرێتەوە؟
(زێرواو)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127675148
SomeoneElse (2022-10-20 17:51:01+00:00): @LockOnGuy which was the correct name:ar for https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/2479377409 - was it version 1 or version 2?

@ڕاستی I'd suggest adding a tag "name:ckb" and adding the Kurdish name there as well as in the "name" tag.
LockOnGuy (2022-10-20 18:00:40+00:00): version 1 and 2 were both correct.     
In version 2 the tags were:         
name:ar=زرواو     
name:ar1=زراوة       
Both should be on the node now as some might call it that and some might call the other.         
But in version 3, ڕاستی removed both, and made the name:ar in Kurdish but with Arabic alphabet,
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:10:32+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4 è errato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:44:40+00:00): grazie, ho risolto. Ciao, Martin
empty_child (2022-10-18 13:14:50+00:00): sachavetrov, добрый день
Хочу у Вас попросить, пишите, пожалуйста, в name хотя бы английское название организации (лучше, конечно, на грузинском), а уже в name:ru на русском. Спасибо
Silva1989 (2022-10-30 16:47:51+00:00): Thanks for improving the map!
DianaDemchuk (2022-11-16 08:04:47+00:00): Thank you, we are glad that our result is noticeable and useful to you!
Sandal man (2022-10-24 21:06:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104694522
Hi, you forgot to tag this way.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-17 16:59:23+00:00): Hi GenKP,
wie ist denn das Nutzungsverbot beschildert? 

Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127676478
nurdafur (2023-05-26 15:12:12+00:00): Hallo Humpi2

Schön, dass du vor Kurzem angefangen hast mit Kartographieren. 
Du hast hier an der Hülshoffstraße und der Altenberger Straße Radwege eingezeichnet, die in keiner Weise mechanisch von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind. Radwege werden in der Regel nicht als separate Highway gezeichnet, wenn sie nur durch Farbe von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind. Für diesen Fall gibt es den Key cycleway=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Eine kleine Ausnahme dazu gibt es:
Wenn ein von der Strasse abgetrennter Radweg für ein sehr kurzes Stück auf der Straße geführt wird, zum Beispiel im Kreuzungsbereich, dann wird er trotzdem als separater Highway gezeichnet.

Ob Radwege oder gemeinsame Rad- und Fußwege, die nur durch einen Bordstein von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind, als separater Highway gezeichnet werden, ist etwas umstritten. Hier um Münster werden diese häufig als eigene Highway gezeichnet. In der Gegend von Aachen wirst du jedoch virtuell gelyncht, wenn du das machst.
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Langlaeufer (2022-10-17 16:56:57+00:00): Hi GenKP,
irgendwie passen Wohnstraße und nur geduldeter Zutritt für mich nicht so richtig zusammen. Wäre highway=service, service=driveway Grundstückszufahrt nicht evtl. passender?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127676701
literan (2022-10-17 15:27:46+00:00): и зачем два дубля?
bxl-forever (2022-10-18 09:04:53+00:00): One more time, please: highway=pedestrian MUST have a name.

That being said, I have the impression you are hunting for every such street to add an area around it.  You are not obliged to do that; a normal street with highway=pedestrian is more than enough.  We created such areas around Bourse/Beurs because there are large areas there, primarily for the sake of rendering/making the map more pleasant to the eye.

Use noname=yes on the area to skip validation, if needed.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:03:07+00:00): Sorry I did not not noname=yes should be added, I try to add pedestrian areas because of micromapping
gscholz (2022-10-22 07:17:25+00:00): Hi Tess2344,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=45.87275&lat=3.08365&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127677359

This kind of errors irritate routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Eman Ghareeb (2022-10-18 10:01:35+00:00): Hello Sal73x;
I noticed you changed the classification for many streets from "service " to "unclassified" and this area showing its an industrial area,
So Preferred  the classification in this area is "service" and the main way leading to another major way is "unclassified"
Could you check this and upgraded the classification?
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325392770
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104703162
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
literan (2022-10-18 16:45:07+00:00): зря вы уничтоженные пути восстановили. Там сейчас стройка ЖК. Поставлю railway=razed
Spjasshka (2022-10-19 12:23:30+00:00): Да, вы правы. Спасибо за актуализацию!
eggie (2022-10-17 15:58:26+00:00): Beste Henk.. Je paden eindigen op de toponym (de naamdrager)  van het gebied. Daarom is het gebied van je edits ook zo groot geworden.
Zie hier je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127678551

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-17 16:01:30+00:00): pad losgemaakt aan de westzijde
literan (2022-10-17 15:25:56+00:00): стоп, а зачем на линии метро выделенная полоса?))

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111747450
Guzalia (2022-10-17 15:32:11+00:00): Это по ошибке) спасибо, исправлено
literan (2022-10-17 15:36:43+00:00): по сути то верно 8))
Guzalia (2022-10-18 10:01:33+00:00): :D
SHARCRASH (2022-10-17 15:21:37+00:00): + naturals split/detailed/corrected, new elements
ndm (2022-10-17 19:39:34+00:00): I've reverted this change there are no one-way signs and junctions are 2-way at either end of Crokeswood Walk.
achyutha (2022-10-19 06:23:33+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for reviewing my change set. This is an honest mistake from my end, where I made the edit without checking proper resources. Thanks for highlighting the issue and making the changes. I would ensure not to repeat such errors again. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
achyutha.
muralito (2022-10-18 17:59:51+00:00): Hola. Si sabes bien cual es la temporada y el horario se le puede poner. por ejemplo opening_hours=Dec-Mar 08:00-20:00
que es de diciembre a marzo, todos los dias, de 8 a 20.
muralito (2022-10-18 18:00:41+00:00): y en los "ref" iria el numero de caseta o algo asi. no se si ahi lo tienen.
fcasti (2022-10-24 15:56:03+00:00): Gracias por los comentarios estimado, los horarios van variando de acuerdo al mes, y los números de caseta no los se.
gurglypipe (2022-10-17 17:13:33+00:00): How is the path blocked? Is it permanently blocked and the path has been removed or un-designated? Satellite imagery is showing it as a very large constructed path along the beck. Is that correct?
Derek Cassells (2022-10-18 06:53:48+00:00): I have been along there a couple of times recently and the route is not there because a factory is in its place. There is an overgrown footpath by the stream. At the other end of the route there is a bike path but I have not followed it to see if I can get through. I hope that this helps. Thank you for your reply.
gurglypipe (2022-10-19 14:06:38+00:00): Sorry, I’m quite confused by this. Where’s the factory? On the satellite imagery I only see hospital buildings and a new housing development.

There’s a really strong trace on Strava heatmap for this cycle path: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.91/-2.98012/53.63338/hot/ride

(I’m not local, just interested in this change because its large bounding box made it pop up on my update feed. So I can’t check it in person.)
Derek Cassells (2022-10-19 14:36:06+00:00): I will go over and check again tomorrow. I wanted to try out the cycle route but found it blocked (twice). I will try from the other direction.
gurglypipe (2022-10-19 14:47:21+00:00): That would be great. Good luck!
Derek Cassells (2022-10-20 13:06:30+00:00): Great news! I have just got back from checking the path north of Southport District General Hospital beside Janes Brook. The trees that were blocking the path at its eastern end (where it meets Scarisbrick New Road) have been cleared. Though the sides of the path are overgrown it is quite passable and the surface is clear.
gurglypipe (2022-10-20 14:28:33+00:00): That’s good news! Thanks for taking the time to double-check it.

I’ve restored the previous access tagging for the path in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127842361.

If there are further edits which need to be made around the area after your survey, please go for it :)
map per (2022-10-24 20:36:12+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128013978 due to persumably adding nonsense and Perekos99 not responding to comment
OSIIJM6OYL (2022-10-17 15:47:25+00:00): Thanks
Honey Fombuena (2022-10-18 16:26:30+00:00): Hi Gaurav! Thank you for mapping this area. For this area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497877489), I think it would be better to remove the landuse=residential tag since the amenity=place_of_worship tag already means that it is a POW grounds just like how we use amenity=school for school grounds. Please don't hesitate to ask questions if you have any. Thank you and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127680321
Gaurav Parajuli (2022-10-18 16:46:09+00:00): Hi Honey, Thank you very much for helping me out to give the suitable tag. 
It had a building=yes tag before so in order to remove the error of building inside the building I used the tag landuse=residential. But I have removed the tag as you mentioned in the comment. 
Thank you once again for your suggestion. I will ask you if I get confused later in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127680321
map per (2022-10-19 09:34:57+00:00): Hello Perekos99 and welcome to Open Street Maps,

you added an ATM within a cemetery (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10109097520) on Open Street Maps.

Cemeterys don't usually have ATMs.
Does this ATM really exist? 

Best wishes
map per
map per (2022-10-24 20:36:04+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128013978 due to persumably adding nonsense and Perekos99 not responding to comment
traveleditor (2022-10-17 15:51:11+00:00): Thank you for editing OpenStreetMap! Your contributions help us a lot, and improve the map!
gpserror (2022-10-22 20:14:43+00:00): Hi, looks like you may have accidentally dragged node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7537269384 out to an improper spot, could you fix this? Thanks!
flo2154 (2022-10-18 19:09:03+00:00): Ist die neu hinzugefügte MVG-Rad-Station https://osm.org/node/10109163873 ein Duplikat der bereits gemappten Station https://osm.org/node/4677297787 ?

In diesem Fall bitte die genaue Position und die Tags überprüfen und die neue Station wieder löschen, damit die History des alten POIs erhalten bleibt.
q5gads4 (2022-10-18 19:18:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, eine ist doppelt, überprüfe die Position, lösche die neue und verschiebe die alte an die korrekte Position.
q5gads4 (2022-10-18 19:37:52+00:00): Alter Eintrag ist nun verschoben an die korrekte Position, vgl.
- https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5764618750226045&lat=48.1323109&lng=11.5716861&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.11436493257001179&y=0.6649901020048714&zoom=0
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127744858
flo2154 (2022-10-18 19:40:03+00:00): Super, vielen Dank!
aceman444 (2022-11-07 21:28:01+00:00): Hi, how is this Pskov region?
How do you see entrances and building levels in Maxar Premium imagery? Also why so many useless nodes on the sides of the buildings? Also it is totally suspicious that all those buildings are the same size, which does not really fit the imagery you claim to use. There are also better imageries available in this region. So this whole changeset seems absolutely invalid and will be reverted.
fedoroff net (2022-11-08 08:32:28+00:00): Don't be so nervous