piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
plettman (2021-10-22 21:39:47+00:00): Hallo Harald,
in der Tat, ich habe den ruins=yes Tag vergessen. Auf den SRTM-Bildern sind sie noch klar zu erkennen.
Korrigiere ich!
Viele Grüße
Plettman
Tiliae (2021-12-07 16:35:23+00:00): Nachtrag nach mehreren Monaten - ganz zufällig bin ich heute noch über eine Luftaufnahme von 1938 gestoßen, auf der das Gebäude im Originalzustand zu erkennen ist. Also ja, du hattest Recht, da war mal was :)

https://i.imgur.com/Sqlbzhr.jpg

Gruß

Harald
plettman (2021-12-07 16:54:54+00:00): Wow, ich ahne, warum das Haus irgendwann abgerissen und nicht wieder aufgebaut wurde!
Viele Grüße
MxxCon (2021-07-21 01:27:32+00:00): Hello.
Do you have some supporting information regarding those missile sites?👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108340684
nitram1234 (2021-07-22 08:31:47+00:00): There is some information here: https://roccopoetic.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/examples_page_1.jpg
Warin61 (2021-07-21 06:44:45+00:00): Hi,

I take it the names for these new streams came from the NSW DCS Base Map? You will find the Base Map to be usefull where things are under tree cover.
Greg_Rose (2021-07-21 17:55:43+00:00): Actually - Elaroo Rill was on the DCS basemap, but the 2 others were mentioned on a blog post referencing the 1:100,000 NATMAP for Penrith, and I confirmed their existence on geoscience.gov.au.
But yeah - that basemap IS great!
Greg_Rose (2021-07-21 18:05:07+00:00): OMG - you took care of the 'disused:railway=rail' tags for me on the Murwillumbah rwy line! Thank you! That was a brainfart - only remembered after I had already gone past Byron Bay. Thx again!
eggie (2021-07-21 05:26:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Probeer in het vervolg het adres intact te laten en alleen de bedrijfsinfo te verwijderen svp.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
TheB55 (2021-07-21 07:06:11+00:00): danku
user_11418917 (2021-07-21 14:59:35+00:00): Stop adding spam!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-20 22:19:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 108340226, 108340255, 108340299.
Eifelkobold! (2021-07-22 21:48:57+00:00): Hi Ichbinvonhier,

bitte keine durch das Hochwasser zerstörten Objekte löschen! Die meisten davon werden wieder aufgebaut/repariert werden und von vielen Sachen stehen auch noch Ruinen.

Es wäre besser, stattdessen den Präfix "destroyed:" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destroyed:) vor den eigentlichen Wert zu setzen um zu kennzeichen, dass dieser Abschnitt zerstört wurde. Zusätzlich wären bei allen durch das Hochwasser zerstörten oder beschädigten Objekten damage-Tags sinnvoll. Euskirchener und ich setzen zurzeit:

damage:date=2021-07-14
damage:event=#flood0721
damage:type=flood

Hier zwei Beispiele:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90426489 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965272663

Bei Rückfragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Nakaner (2021-07-21 08:32:22+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für die Korrektur.

Hochwasserschäden an Straßen, die zu einer vsl. längeren Unbefahrbarkeit führen, erfassen wir i.d.R. als Baustellen: highway=construction + construction=<alte Straßenklasse>, hier also highway=construction + construction=primary.

Das von dir verwendete access=no ist eine Zugangsbeschränkung. Zwar wird es das Routing über diese Straßen auch verhindern, inhaltlich drückt es aber nur ein Benutzungsverbot aus. Tatsächlich ist die Straße stark beschädigt oder gar nicht mehr da.

Andere Mapper ergänzen bei den Hochwasserschäden des aktuellen Ereignis außerdem noch folgende Tags, damit man später z.B. mit der Overpass-API die umgetaggten Objekte leicht finden und sichten kann.

damage:date=2021-07-14
damage:event=#flood0721
damage:type=flood

Siehe auch die Diskussion im OSM-Forum unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73292 (Login mit OSM-Konto).

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108341499
UWJ (2021-08-18 16:31:46+00:00): Straße und Brücke ist befahrbar und freigegeben. Bin gerade, wie viele andere darüber gefahren. Bild vorhanden.
Cafetom (2021-07-21 03:32:34+00:00): Tiene que revisar la Guía para mapear en Colombia, ya que esta cometiendo varios errores de etiquetado en los municipios del Tolima. La etiqueta Building=* no se debe usar para demarcar cuadras o áreas residenciales.    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
Cafetom (2021-07-21 03:34:44+00:00): La etiqueta building=* representa exclusivamente edificios o edificaciones. Por lo tanto, usarla en áreas residenciales para demarcar cuadras, urbanizaciones, u otros elementos que no son una sola edificación es un error.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-22 15:18:53+00:00): This is deliberate sabotage and has nothing to do with reality, and there is nothing on the ground that I have edited
Pt873 (2021-07-21 03:32:15+00:00): Oi, essa edição está incorreta.
(Inactive) Hoordinates (2021-07-26 18:57:16+00:00): Thank you for letting me know.
Tomas Straupis (2021-07-21 09:33:39+00:00): Prieš kelis metus buvom sutarę, kad wetland=reedbed yra meldai ar kažkas, kas yra vandens telkinio dalis. T.y. reedbed yra tai, ką ramiai gaima paišyti TIK ANT landuse=reservoir ar natural=water, jei tai nėra vandens telkinio dalis (yra greta), tada tai marsh arba swamp.
luisforte (2021-07-21 00:03:53+00:00): Boas, 
Não duvido do teu conhecimento local do terreno, mas deves referir a fonte, COS2018, não só por uma questão legal mas também para ajudar qualquer mapeador que pretenda fazer alterações nesta área futuramente,
Luis
ReleasedBait (2021-07-21 09:30:02+00:00): Boas,
na minha esperiência desta zona a COS2018 não tem a precisão/veracidade que eu gostaria por isso ultimamente tenho usado simples interpretação das imagens de satélite "Esri World Imagery" para areas nature/landuse, MapsWithAI para paths/roads, suplementando com e fotos pessoais e conhecimento do terreno e OpenTopoMap (quando faz sentido). Penso que as minhas fontes refletem o que realmente estou a usar como base.
VictorIE (2024-07-25 12:35:45+00:00): Hi,

Duplicate post office https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966043229/history
tekim (2021-07-23 00:06:58+00:00): Thanks for the edits on this task!  The fire is long out - thankfully, but I am sure there will be other disasters, so this still helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108342480
Allison P (2021-07-28 06:22:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99143925 stands to be removed
Allison P (2021-07-28 06:23:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7687270725
redd (2021-07-21 09:41:22+00:00): Hi Osmosefixer,
this was not a typo, but intentionally tagged as building=semidetached_houses, because its two attached semidetached houses. The wiki especially allows user defined values for building=*.
There is currently a lack for a good tagging for 2 attached semidetached houses, therfore i used this tagging.
Some poeple prefer to split the buildings up and tag each one as semidetached house, but I think we need to find a solution for the whole duplex as well.
aceman444 (2021-09-11 14:37:26+00:00): Dakujem, tiz si myslim, ze ide o obycajne hroby, ziadne pamatniky ci dokonca umelecke diela. Vsetky tie Blavakove "zjednotenia" by sa mali revertovat, ako je nazor na fore.
kartonage (2021-07-22 10:07:46+00:00): Hej,

for your information, you have tagged the whole district of Amuria and Soroti as building here. I have removed the tag, but please be more careful in the future. Thanks.

Best regards
Bilange (2021-07-21 20:58:16+00:00): Juste pour être certain de ne pas causer d'erreurs supplémentaires de ma part: je vois le retrait des footway autour du parc dans ce changeset, est-ce pour se conformer avec les tags sidewalk existants dans les rues avoisinants, ou bien une "best practice" de ne pas marquer les trottoirs de manière indépendante? Je voyais les trottoirs explicitement tracés à Drummondville que je me servais comme ville de référence. Je suis au courant du Wiki:Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway, mais s'il existe un concensus local au Canada/Québec, laissez-moi savoir :)
webfil (2021-07-22 12:47:49+00:00): En effet, pas de consensus. J'ai supprimé pour les mêmes raisons que dans le message; c'était connecté à rien, et des chemins se croisaient sans être connectés
webfil (2021-07-23 14:55:56+00:00): Ok en allumant la couche WMTS des orthophotos du gouvernement, je viens de comprendre mon erreur (meilleure qualité d'image!) : autour de ce parc il y a des trottoirs détachés de la chaussée, d'autres qui y sont annexés. Je vais essayer de réparer ça.
Sandal man (2021-07-21 06:38:54+00:00): Hola, gracias por su ayuda para personalizar OSM, pero está dibujando un jardín en un edificio.
Para hacer esto, primero debe hacer una abertura en el edificio con un "multipoligon".
ver  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relation:multipolygon

Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2021-07-21 06:59:55+00:00): Aquí dibujas un camino a través de un edificio.
Creo que es solo un techo.
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Droof
Consulte también los mensajes de error en su editor. 
Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2021-07-21 06:33:20+00:00): Hola, gracias por ayudarnos a personalizar el OSM, pero está dibujando un edificio dentro de otro edificio, eso no está permitido.
Luego usa "Building: part = yes"
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building:part

También preste atención a los mensajes de error en el editor.
 
Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2021-07-21 06:44:23+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu ayuda para personalizar OSM, pero no creo que estos sean 2 edificios.
Luego use "landuse = residential" o registre todos los edificios por separado.

Saludos Jan
Kovoschiz (2021-07-21 07:12:07+00:00): There's no need to delete them.
BCNorwich (2021-07-21 06:37:48+00:00): Hi, There is usually no need for negative tags like intermittent=no or oneway=no as in their absence they are implied.

I've made minor amendments to the water areas.

Regards Bernard.
LordGarySugar (2021-07-21 11:47:43+00:00): Ok, thank you for your advice, I only learned how to map in OSM yesterday so any feedback is valuable.
katpatuka (2021-08-04 08:43:53+00:00): Merhaba Bora,

I stumbled upon two dıfferent Asia Minor  relations (relation 12518234 and 12519384) - you've edited both of them - can you get rid of one of them ?

;)
ovruni (2021-07-21 05:03:57+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona sobre el sentido de una vía, sin embargo se ha eliminado el nodo 1863374494 para unir las etiquetas con las del nodo 5593299249, por este este motivo he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
Minh Nguyen (2021-07-21 15:23:38+00:00): Thanks for this update! Do you happen to know if there’s still a tornado siren on the roof? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6719056946 I suppose it’s possible it got replaced by a modern, pole-mounted siren nearby.
Tigereye007 (2021-07-22 01:54:05+00:00): I suspect it’s still on the roof, however I can’t say I’ve really tried to see it up there. Next time I walk around there, I’ll try and have a look, and I’ll update it if it’s moved.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-04 06:03:45+00:00): OSM is a map of the real world. Please do not write on the map using features such as parks.
ovruni (2021-07-21 05:01:04+00:00): Hola. en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "Estaba mal señalado como vía de sentido único", sin embargo el cambio se ha modificado el nombre, el cual se encuentra en el registro de la base de datos del INEI.
Saludos
Cyberjuan (2021-07-21 05:09:57+00:00): Hola
¿El INEI tiene precedencia sobre las denominaciones hechas por la municipalidad? o sea, vivo ahí, y es claramente una avenida, no un jirón, así está en las señalizaciones y  direcciones de la calle, además de la documentación predial de la Muni del Rímac.
ovruni (2021-07-21 05:13:45+00:00): Con respecto a lo de la avenida ya lo he modificado yo mismo, si te fijas en la vía 344572213
Cyberjuan (2021-07-21 05:18:22+00:00): Pues acá sigue apareciendo como jirón... https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-12.02532/-77.03854 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108345771#map=18/-12.02532/-77.03854
ovruni (2021-07-21 05:23:15+00:00): Las teselas pueden demorar en actualizar dependiendo el nivel de zoom, el cache del navegador, etc. Las etiquetas de las vías se puede ver en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344572213 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75046491
Saludos
Dimitar155 (2021-07-27 19:32:29+00:00): Hello Stomario. Can I ask you from where you have this data? Is Rumyana the owner of a shop?

Здравейте Stomario. Мога ли да ви попитам откъде имате тези данни? Румяна собственик ли е на някой магазин?
aweech (2021-07-21 21:21:49+00:00): Hi,
In this edit, you created an object in the place of a building, but you forgot to tag it as a building. I've noticed that you Zartico mappers do that a lot, and I am recommending that you add the building tags where it is appropriate. Also, buildings, including this one, usually have right angles. The editor you are using has two ways to help you draw right angles on buildings. One way is to select the building and press the "q" button. The other is to right click the building and choose the option to square. I see that I reminded you of this back in May, but you seem to have forgotten by now. Please don't forget again.
roshanparajuli (2021-07-22 01:59:43+00:00): Sorry for the mistake, it won't repeat again.
aweech (2021-07-21 21:36:27+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you clearly copied bad data from Bing Maps. You have already been told before that that is not permissible behavior, and yet you continue.
roshanparajuli (2021-07-22 02:00:38+00:00): Sorry for the mistake, it won't repeat again.
portalaventura (2021-07-30 00:17:31+00:00): Olá, por gentileza arrume o encontro entre a Rua Orlando Fração e a Rua Frederico Ozanan. Elas formam um ângulo de 90 graus, como era antes da sua edição.

Arrume também a Rua Tabaja Dias da Rosa. Ela não possuiu o formato dado por sua alteração.

Mais uma vez, alerto que você não pode ficar reduzindo extensões de ruas ou alterando o angulo que elas formam, sem uma justificativa para isso.

Por gentileza PARE de vandalizar os dados na cidade! PARE de excluir informação que a comunidade local levou tempo para obter. PARE de gerar retrabalho para a comunidade local.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108347182
RiverBearings (2021-08-03 22:39:31+00:00): Portalaventura. Posso facilmente restaurar esse ângulo de volta às estradas em https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1784261530, pois era uma pequena diferença em relação à versão anterior. Vou revisar todas as estradas com curvas feitas e fazer o mesmo. Devo terminar todos os alinhamentos esta semana em Santa Maria. Obrigado por sua paciência enquanto isso está sendo feito.

Portalaventura. I can easily restore these angle back to the roads at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1784261530 as it was a marginal difference from its previous version. I will review all roads with turns made and do the same. I should be finished will all alignments this week in Santa Maria. Thank for your patience as that is being done.
osmviborg (2021-07-21 07:38:06+00:00): Hej. Hvorfor tilføjer du alle disse tags? Tilføj venligst kun de relevante tags.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-18 15:13:30+00:00): Er maxspeed=5 virkelig rigtigt?

og access=yes kan ikke være korrekt.
KristianRL (2022-07-07 08:05:48+00:00): Der er sat skilt op om hastighedsbegrænsning på 5 km/t.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-07 10:12:13+00:00): Er det et officielt skilt?
SekeRob (2021-10-14 12:14:10+00:00): Hi,

Note, I've retagged and connected your rapids with the river... everything with 'river' must be connected all the way to the sea. Made it part of the river area relation while clearing duplicate lining. No need to map lines on top of lines, just assign a relation role.

cheers
aweech (2021-07-21 21:52:49+00:00): Hi,
When a business has multiple buildings like this, it should be modeled as either an area around the entire developed portion of the lot or as a node. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel#How_to_map for more information.
roshanparajuli (2021-07-22 02:01:46+00:00): Sorry for the mistake, it won't repeat again.
user_5239402 (2021-07-21 05:55:30+00:00): 안녕하세요. 혹시 포켓몬 고에서 포켓스톱을 추가하려고 지도를 매핑하시나요? 포켓스톱과 체육관의 위치는 지도 데이터와 무관합니다. 포켓스톱은 특정 위도, 경도 상에 어떤 랜드마크가 있다고 인그레스 사용자가 (포탈을) 등록해서 그 자리에 생긴 것이지 지도에 쓰여 있다고 생긴 게 아닙니다. 하지만 건물과 도로 정보는 반영될수 있습니다.
aweech (2021-07-21 22:41:03+00:00): Hi,
I have a couple of comments about this edit. For one thing you put the entire address into the addr:city tag for some reason. Only the mailing city goes in that tag. Another is that the Westwind Cottages are much larger than the area that you drew. A business like this with multiple building should be represented either as a node or as an area drawn around the entire campus, not just one corner of it. Also, the area that you drew was had the shape and location of a building, but you didn't tag it as a building for some reason. I've seen Zartico mappers making these mistakes a lot. I think that you need to revise your processes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
aweech (2021-07-21 23:13:38+00:00): Hi,
It's not really accurate to apply the tags for The Hampton Inn & Suites entire building as the hotel only occupies a portion of it. There's also restaurants, a parking garage, and a bunch of condos here. All of the other business nodes along the building should have communicated that to you. Also, you moved the building so that it overlaps with the street. You seem to be tracing the roof of the building as it appears in the Bing aerial imagery instead of the base.
habi (2021-07-22 14:37:30+00:00): Ciao theophrastos

In diesem Changeset hast du mehrere Strassen mit `cycleway:b=no` versehen: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19DT

Ich nehme mal an, das ist ein Tippfehler, ich kann aber nicht eruieren, wie der Tag richtig lauten sollte (sonst hätte ich das grad selber korrigiert).
Evtl. kannst du dem ja nachgehen.

Gruss aus der Schweiz,
habi

PS: Ich kam wegen https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm hier vorbei :)
theophrastos (2021-07-22 15:53:43+00:00): Mist, sollte cycleway:both sein, ist korrigiert, Danke

MfG
Klaus
user_11418917 (2021-07-21 15:09:51+00:00): What is your sources?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108349518
eggie (2021-07-21 07:37:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
plamen (2023-05-18 20:23:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Only_use_object-specific_emergency_numbers
eggie (2021-07-21 07:45:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Je hebt de vorm van het gebouw veranderd. Klopt dat wel. In de BAG staat nog de oude vorm. wanneer iets niet meer klopt graag doorgeven aan het Kadaster volgens onderstaande link
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=de%20factorij%203&resultOffset=0&objectId=0405100000527061&geometry.x=133092.079&geometry.y=520038.134&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0405010000564839

MVG
eggie

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-07-21 08:10:00+00:00): Gebouw adres nr 3 hersteld naar BAG
Staat Carteam de Egel Autoservice  niet op het verkeerde gebouw?

MVG
eggie
ravali_78 (2021-07-22 04:42:23+00:00): Hi clw92,
I have removed floating segments.Kindly check with way 966101130,way 966101131,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108396247.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108351065
aweech (2021-07-21 23:47:33+00:00): Hi,
A business offering rental cabins is tagged with tourism=chalet, not tourism=hotel. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=chalet for more information.
nevw (2021-07-21 10:57:51+00:00): Please be aware that you editing an operation map.
I am unsure what your intent was but your edits have been reverted.
eggie (2021-07-21 07:47:59+00:00): Beste Support Carteam

Beperk het gebied van je edits tot bv een straat. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-21 08:56:57+00:00): Dag Mats,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. 
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
MVG
eggie
nyampire (2021-07-22 01:17:39+00:00): こんにちは。
「大字扇町屋」は、入間市内に現存する地名のため、削除変更を巻き戻しました。
こちらの編集なのですが、もしかして、「大字扇町屋」ではなく、大字の表記を削った「扇町屋」であるべき、という意図でしょうか？
shinyshiny (2021-07-22 04:48:31+00:00): こんにちは。
大字扇町屋の場所が異なると思ったので削除しましたが、私の知識不足でそこが正しい場所だったのかもしれません。私の知識では入間市の久保稲荷近くに大字扇町屋の地名がありますが、よく調べてみることにします。ともあれ、巻き戻しについてお手数をおかけしました。
nyampire (2021-07-23 00:30:25+00:00): なるほど、理解しました。
その場合、削除ではなく、場所を移動させるほうがよいかもしれません。iDエディタであれば、対象のオブジェクトをドラッグ・アンド・ドロップすれば移動させることができます。
地名はほんとうはエリアで表現されるもので、代表点の位置が異なっていることはままあります。
よりよい位置が見つかったら、そこに移動させてみてください。
Happy Mapping!
shinyshiny (2021-07-23 03:58:36+00:00): こんにちは。
わかりました、より良い位置がありましたら、今度はそこに移動するようにします。
アドバイスありがとうございました！
eggie (2021-07-21 08:51:05+00:00): Dag Ruuubje

Routeren zal het allemaal niet, want je wegdeel ligt los van de Berkenstraat en het verloop van de Lindelaan.
Ook hoeven op een reguliere weg geen accesstags.

Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
Enock4seth (2021-07-22 11:55:49+00:00): Please take note of the Imagery offset with Bing and existing data. Use the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database plugin to find out about offsets saved by others.
muchichka_s (2021-08-18 01:22:00+00:00): Привіт. Чому видалено tracktype? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379702675/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108353342
abakus_uploader (2021-07-21 22:32:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
voltairovicz (2021-07-21 09:29:32+00:00): Wow, co też nie zrobi routing, że poprowadził aż przez polny track, żeby dotrzeć na autostradę. Dobra edycja!