piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
benoitdd (2023-01-02 12:05:15+00:00): c'est A26 Architectures: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/a26-architecture_inserre-arras-activity-6985617681097883648-6958
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 18:58:49+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129781484
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 12:39:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119839274 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119839275 appear to be trees, not buildings?
silversurfer83 (2022-12-06 20:37:56+00:00): Hallo
Hier bitte ich dringend um Antwort:
Warum löscht Du ein Gebäude, welches vor kurzem erst von einem Kollegen bearbeitet wurde und als Feuerwehr gekennzeichnet war, komplett aus der Datenbank?
Der Kommentar "Privateigentum" ist da übrigens nicht ausreichend. Dinge, die vor Ort sichtbar sind werden von uns in die Datenbank aufgenommen. Besonders Gebäude und Wege.
Sind diese für die Öffentlichkeit nicht zugänglich, so gibt es da Tags (verschieden Eigenschaften), die man an die Objekte machen kann. Aber es wird eigentlich nichts gelöscht.
Daher: Warum?

Grüße
silversurfer83
JPschw (2022-12-07 06:45:21+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83, die Info habe ich direkt vom Ortsvorsteher bekommen. Das FFW Haus ist jetzt ein Neubau in der Ludwigsecker Str. 3 was im Juli ´22 übergeben wurde. Beim großen G sieht man noch nichts. Das mit dem Löschen, war so keine Absicht. Eher der Bitte verschuldet es "zu löschen", ja da hätte ich anders handeln sollen. Die Info was jetzt im diesen Gebäude ist bekomme ich noch. Viele Grüße.
silversurfer83 (2022-12-07 08:15:51+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort
Ich werde die Änderung rückgängig machen und anschließend nur die Info, dass dies die Feuerwehr ist, entfernen.
Grüße
Silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2022-12-07 20:25:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129834840

ist wieder da
silversurfer83 (2022-12-07 20:37:23+00:00): und hier ist das neue Feuerwehrhaus. Passt das? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120200595
JPschw (2022-12-07 20:48:14+00:00): Guten Abend silversurfer83, habe mich rückversichert, die "alte" FFW ist jetzt eine Privates Gebäude.  Ja das neue FFW Haus dürfte so passen. Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 18:58:58+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129780860
silversurfer83 (2022-12-06 20:34:00+00:00): Hallo JP :)

Den wichtigsten Tag hast du vergessen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dadvertising_agency

Grüße
silversurfer83
JPschw (2022-12-07 06:32:27+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83, vielen Dank :)
tastrax (2023-02-03 05:57:58+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
marczoutendijk (2022-12-06 12:51:56+00:00): Hello kortgod,
You use 2 different changeset comments:
"rettelser og justeringer"
and:
"rettelser og tilføjelser".
(I checked the last 5 days).
Those comments are not very helpful to other mappers as that is what we all do: 
"correcting and adjusting".
We would like to know (without having to open each changeset), what you have changed or added.
Can you improve on that behaviour?
Also read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
kortgodt (2022-12-06 13:49:38+00:00): My captions are very close to those of  user osmviborg or as descripsive as Hjart or Niels Elgaard Larsen.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-06 15:01:36+00:00): But I asked you, not them!
The fact that others also are very sparse with their comments - as a dwg member I can list many more users - does not mean that it cannot be improved upon!
kortgodt (2022-12-06 16:21:13+00:00): Working on improving my contributions  to OSM all the time.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-06 19:03:19+00:00): Not only your contributions should improve, but also the way you present them to your fellow mappers!
SekeRob (2022-12-07 16:18:19+00:00): Hi,

Not sure what layer there was to fix but a bridge on layer 1 and then the road 'cutting' is not considered underground. Now QA is asking for the tunnel tag. IF it's a tunnel, opinions differ,, then the rail bridge has to go.

Anyway, those 2 bridges next to the rail probably serve farm traffic and a underground drain(?), can't make out any track in imagery.

caio
damianeue (2022-12-07 16:23:13+00:00): Hi, I was trying to make the bridge show on the map above the street underneath it, as it is, and after an inconclusive discussion on the OSM Italy group I forgot to remove the tags. I will take care of this asap. Thanks for telling me
SekeRob (2022-12-07 17:40:44+00:00): The reason I mapped the bridge 'area' was because I could not make out any ways. The standard carto does show this area properly.

But now zooming in, the area where the rail crosses probably should be retagged i.e. rail bridge removed and for the road part that goes below that quite wide grass covered section tunnel=yes+layer=-1.

Culverts don't render well in Carto but if there's no roof, considered a surface element.
damianeue (2022-12-07 18:03:31+00:00): I think it can stay like this (since it isn't a big deal, everything is there) until there isn't a definitive answer about the bridge purpose and then we can think about the right tags to use (for it and for the street/sidewalks)
jeslop (2022-12-06 15:56:54+00:00): Duplicidades, lo elimino también.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 19:13:21+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
sh0rtykin (2022-12-07 09:00:46+00:00): Sure.
I think here I added drinking water and recycle bin and deleted a toilet that was nowhere indicated and all doors locked.
Tatfahren (2022-12-06 17:47:44+00:00): Zuerst: Bitte Keine Werbung in der Beschreibung! Das hab ich jetzt entfernt.

Nun eine Frage: Du hast diesen Parkplatz über den Bestehenden Parkplatz der METRO eingezeichnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23954583). 

Wurde dieser Parkplatz an euch verkauft/vermietet?, dann kommen die entsprechenden Tags in diesen Parkplatz. 

Oder wurde nur ein Teil des Parkplatzes an euch vermietet?, dann den bestehenden Parkplatz verkleinern und diesen Daneben setzen. 

So ist das jetzt ein Parkplatz auf einem Parkplatz, was sich wiederspricht/eine dopplung ist.

Wenn sich das zu kompliziert anhört kann ich das auch machen, vorrausgesetzt du gibst die Position eures Parkplatzes genau an (der schein momentan sehr grob).
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 02:14:02+00:00): você distorceu a rua aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7302522413
jeslop (2022-12-06 15:54:51+00:00): Has duplicado características. Lo elimino.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2022-12-06 15:52:33+00:00): Saludos MapeoAlmería. ¿Podrías informar la fuente de todos estos cambios que estás haciendo? Está claro que ahí no hay ningún estadio de fútbol americano. OSM no es lugar para este tipo de ediciones. Revierto éste, y probablemente otros cambios.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
bxl-forever (2022-12-06 21:47:49+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

If you want to draw buildings, you might want to know that we never trace buildings from aerial imagery.  Otherwise, it gives all sorts of funny shapes that do not match the real outline of the buildings.

In the iD editors, when you are editing, you can use the Background button and scroll to the "AIV Flanders GRB" layer.  Then, you see the real shape of buildings and you can trace on top of that.
jayarajsm (2022-12-16 12:02:59+00:00): Thanks for the information, I will do it going forward.
user_3022894 (2023-04-16 12:42:30+00:00): Ich weise dich noch ein letztes Ma darauf hin,
dass Flächennutzungen nicht mit Straßen zu verbinden sind.

Des Weiteren war bspw. die Löschung dieser Flächennutzung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119469363/history

nicht richtig.
Yunan973 (2023-07-28 00:17:51+00:00): Hi,

do you know if the restoration is over ?

Best regards
Yunan973 (2023-07-28 00:48:56+00:00): Another question : the next section (see version 1 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219770395/history) has a note "under restoration" for around 10 years.
Probably over ?

Best regards
Richard (2023-07-28 07:00:44+00:00): Haha. I like your optimism. The Montgomery Canal has been under restoration since the 1960s and it will be a while yet until it’s finished. The current focus of restoration is Schoolhouse Bridge. I and other mappers do methodically update OSM as each section is (slowly!) reopened.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-07 21:09:41+00:00): Hi I'm reviewing objects tagged as amenity=lounge. The tag is mostly used for airport lounges and similar, with few exceptions. Is this object (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119864640) similar to an airport lounge or is there maybe a better tag for it?
spookypeanut (2024-01-08 09:50:15+00:00): This is a hotel lounge: I don't know if that is suitable similar.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-13 07:46:41+00:00): Not sure, you know the hotel. Personally I would probably use the tag for an exclusive lounge (executive lounge/club lounge) that offers things not offered to ordinary guests but not if the hotel just calls its lobby a "lounge", or the area in front of the bar
eggie (2022-12-06 16:21:00+00:00): Oplaadpunten kun je intekeken op een node

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

en dan aangeven bicycle=yes
small_electric_vehicle=yes
motorcar=no
Dillen GJ (2022-12-06 16:28:33+00:00): Be my guest om dat op deze manier aan te passen Eggie.
Tot die tijd is de opmerking: 6 oplaadpunten…. functioneel genoeg voor gebruikers
eggie (2022-12-06 16:35:43+00:00): Dan zet je op de node capacity=6 Het geeft ook een symboo en op de fietskaart is het vindbaar.
Dus in dit geval 1 node ergens op de plek van de oplaadpunten.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 16:37:02+00:00): De toevoeging op het vlak kan.. maar een router doet er niets mee.. Wel met een node charging_station
Dillen GJ (2022-12-06 16:44:21+00:00): Prima plan wil jij dat dan voor me doen Eggie ? zou super zijn !
eggie (2022-12-06 17:38:45+00:00): Dan moet ik wel weten in welke hoek die oplader staat..
Dillen GJ (2022-12-06 17:45:52+00:00): Ik maak een opmerking op die plek kan jij t aanmaken, goed idee ?
ibanez (2022-12-07 04:41:13+00:00): Moin, willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Bitte die Wikiseite zu Hydranten ansehen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de
Namen sollten nur dann vergeben werden, wenn die auch so vor Ort am Objekt beschriftet sind. Bei einem Niederflurhydranten bezweifele ich das mal.
ybungalobill (2022-12-06 22:09:57+00:00): Hi,
Based on the docs, 'service' is for access roads to individual properties and businesses. 'unclassified' is, confusingly, a very minor connecting road.
I've reverted Harvey Siding Road back to 'unclassified', because it connects Howes Brook and Little Canada to the the outside.
eggie (2022-12-06 15:36:59+00:00): GJ Svp geen name tag gebruiken voor een functie behalve als de naam van het gebouw officieel Kippenhok is.
Volgens mij is er zelfs en tag voor zoiets.

Dit hetzelfde als je bv name=huis name=bankje tagt.

Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 
MVG
eggie (2022-12-06 16:18:30+00:00): name= kippenhok omgezet naar description
SekeRob (2022-12-07 15:17:59+00:00): Hi,

You know how the motorway was before, but now Flixbus N403 and 419 show big successive gaps on the motorway A4 going east from Mailand.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9424216#map=15/45.5700/9.3819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9424216#map=15/45.5700/9.3819

Since at least 1 section of motorway showing version V1 you must have been doing more than just cutting up the road. Anyway, this is what Turbo overpass shows what you touched in this change set

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129785992&relations=true

No idea how the affected 2 Flixbus routes ran here before, straight on or visitng 1 or more stops at junctions.

ciao
aa30mom (2022-12-07 17:30:48+00:00): I have fixed problems with N403 and 419. Regards
Владимир К (2022-12-15 20:27:12+00:00): маршруты восстановить вам не удалось, вы создали новый с одним участником. я поправлю
oleinap (2022-12-15 20:54:34+00:00): прошу "расскажите", что и как исправили
Владимир К (2022-12-17 15:07:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14977320 удалил отношение, порезал кольцо так, чтобы можно было добавить только часть, где едет автобус, добавил в нужные куски в разрывах маршрутов



https://osmcha.org/changesets/130130699/
Владимир К (2022-12-17 15:08:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13068442/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13068171/history
marczoutendijk (2022-12-07 13:25:27+00:00): Hi TeeTee85,
You don't have to tag a building with "name=building". building=yes is perfect!
I fixed it.
Read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-01-01 20:05:26+00:00): vandal, fictional data
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129786514
maro21 (2022-12-06 19:37:36+00:00): Przydałaby się jeszcze droga dojazdowa do tego parkingu :) I na pewno nie jest to parking=lane, co od razu widać po kształcie
Note_Fixer (2022-12-06 14:55:00+00:00): moved fiber line pipe for drain.
Samokat (2022-12-10 11:39:05+00:00): * с Яндекс.Панорама, сьемкой улиц и со спутника.
aTarom (2022-12-06 16:04:50+00:00): Hello DianaDemchuk,
I correct these cases of
key "Junction" -> "junction" 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119877957/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909351484/history
-------------------------------------
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119855193/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119854074/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119852400/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119833773/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145403717/history
------------------
This changeset text is shown
"...Source -Bing Maps Aerial"
but changeset tag is
"imagery_used"="PNOA Spain"?

Cheers
DianaDemchuk (2022-12-06 16:13:44+00:00): Thanks for noticing and fixing it. I will be more careful.
mitxel (2022-12-23 00:42:28+00:00): Por favor, solicito que se REVIERTA este conjunto de cambios .

Estos caminos existen. Es un error eliminarlos.

- Muchos de los elementos eliminados contaban con varias revisiones de diferentes usuarios, y algunos de ellos incluso están recogidos en la cartografía oficial de Nafarroa.

-Algunos son poco visibles al discurrir por bosque y karst, pero bastaría etiquetarlos con
 
trail_visibility=bad 
trail_visibility=horrible
trail_visibility=no

(algunos ya tenían esta etiqueta)

-otros son perfectamente visibles y aun así  también se han eliminado



juancar_lo : Por favor no borres elementos que no te gusta que se muestren en los mapas.

Lo correcto es etiquetar adecuadamente.

En el ultimo mes has eliminado mas de 100 senderos y caminos en Aralar sin consultar con los editores anteriores. 

Ver entre otros estos conjuntos de cambios:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129788180


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716946

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129911369

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716618

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716162
Minh Nguyen (2023-08-31 21:46:36+00:00): Chào bạn, các giá trị như VN:CT và VN:QL thật có lý, nhưng các thay đổi này làm cho các bản đồ như OSM Americana không còn nhận ra các tuyến đường QL/CT để hiển thị số đường đúng màu. Dĩ nhiên có thể cập nhật OSM Americana nếu cộng đồng muốn sử dụng các giá trị này. Để tránh vấn đề mai mốt, tôi đã đề nghị thống nhất các giá trị này trong nhóm Facebook; xin bạn tham gia cho ý kiến. https://www.facebook.com/groups/openstreetmapvietnam/posts/1653123425098640/
eggie (2022-12-06 15:49:08+00:00): Beste PiMP  bicycle=no hoeft niet op een highway=footway toegevoegd te worden.
Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 18:13:48+00:00): Toegangswegen ingetekend met accesstags...  Garage op adresnode gezet 

Groet
eggie
osmviborg (2022-12-06 16:00:22+00:00): 'man_made=works' hører ikke til på bygninger
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-12 20:46:16+00:00): OK, fjernet
mitxel (2022-12-23 00:26:50+00:00): Por favor, solicito que se REVIERTA este conjunto de cambios .

Estos caminos existen. Es un error eliminarlos.

- Muchos de los elementos eliminados contaban con varias revisiones de diferentes usuarios, y algunos de ellos incluso están recogidos en la cartografía oficial de Nafarroa.

-Algunos son poco visibles al discurrir por bosque y karst, pero bastaria etiquetarlos con
 
trail_visibility=bad 
trail_visibility=horrible
trail_visibility=no

(algunos ya tenían esta etiqueta)

-otros son perfectamente visibles y aun así  también se han eliminado



juancar_lo : Por favor no borres elementos que no te gusta que se muestren en los mapas.

Lo correcto es etiquetar adecuadamente.

En el ultimo mes has eliminado mas de 100 senderos y caminos en Aralar sin consultar con los editores anteriores. 

Ver entre otros estos conjuntos de cambios:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129788180

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129786975

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716946

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129911369

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716618

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129716162
eggie (2022-12-06 15:54:02+00:00): ,,, maar als je fietspad niet vastzit aan een andere weg zal het niet routeren.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129788214

De foutmelding

warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway

Check dus steeds of alles vastzit
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 15:57:27+00:00): Fietspad verplaatst.. bicycle=use_sidepath verwijderd
Palolo (2022-12-06 16:15:27+00:00): We appreciate the help mapping. Please work to trace buildings accurately with square corners. Use the q key please.
mwanguya (2022-12-09 21:17:35+00:00): its true i have not use the q i saw it sometimes it did not work out,i will do so from now on@palolo
ALu68 (2022-12-06 22:21:46+00:00): Du kannst kein Gebäude einzeichen, wo keins mehr ist.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119891650/history
Gero Gerke (2022-12-06 15:51:22+00:00): Leider passt der ganze FIXME nicht in den Changeset. Hier der ganze Text: Der genau zu nutzende Tag ist mir etwas unklar. Die Fläche wird von der Stadt als "Teil des geschützten Landschaftsbestandteils Ossendorfer Brache" bezeichnet. Ein geschützter Landschaftsbestandteil (https://www.bfn.de/geschuetzte-landschaftsbestandteile) ist aber in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Schutzgebiete_des_Natur-_und_Landschaftsschutzes nicht gesondert aufgeführt. Vielleicht können die Expert:innen hier einen passenden Tag wählen, der sowohl die Flächennutzung als auch die Naturschutzaspekte berücksichtigt.
abakus_uploader (2022-12-06 23:35:05+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2022-12-11 10:30:08+00:00): Hi,
the language code 'dk' doesn't exist. I guess you mean Danish, this would be 'da'. Could you check / fix that?
Jay May (2022-12-11 12:09:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for highlighting this. As I can't see where I made that mistake, could you fix that for me, please?
Thanks a bunch!
mueschel (2022-12-11 12:54:20+00:00): Here you are:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129961742
eggie (2022-12-06 21:37:06+00:00): Hoi, Je vraagt feedback.. 

De syntaxis klopt niet in de value.

Eigenlijk vallen die gemotoriseerde tweewielers ook gewoon onder motor_vehicle.  Josm geeft nu een foutmelding.
Zou die hele rits dus gewoon inkorten en alleen motor_vehicle:conditional gebruiken
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129788901
MVG
eggie
Chiuaua (2022-12-07 16:29:12+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Het verbod is voor motorvoertuigen op meer dan twee wielen. Als ik kijk naar de wiki over transport mode restrictions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions), dan is er voor double-tracked voertuigen wel een tag, maar die wordt nauwelijks gebruikt ("Please note double_tracked_motor_vehicle=* is suggested in motorcar=* but neither widely used nor officially approved; it would allow one single tag instead of ten tags (one for each of the child types)."

Een voorbeeld bij de conditional restrictions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions) is als volgt:
(access=yes) + access:conditional=no @ (09:00-17:00); destination @ (09:00-17:00 AND disabled) will allow destination traffic for disabled persons (the last match) while all other traffic isn't allowed 9am-5pm. The time condition needs to be repeated in the second value, otherwise disabled persons would only have destination access 17:00-09:00 while all other traffic would have general access.

Op basis daarvan heb ik de restrictie gebouwd, hoewel ik 'm ook niet helemaal kan terugberedeneren.

Ik zal 'm ook nog eens in JOSM bekijken en zien of ik 'm passend kan krijgen, maar ik heb niet altijd de PC beschikbaar en moet het soms gewoon ff op de tablet met iD doen ;)
eggie (2022-12-07 16:34:29+00:00): Hoi.. 'k Begrijp je bedoeling.. Ik werd alleen getriggerd doordat de validator van josm aansloeg.
Succes met aanpassen..
eggie
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-18 06:00:18+00:00): ay4mr6u4,请使用有意义的changeset comment（变更集注释），这对于其他编辑者review和了解您所作了什么会非常有帮助
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129788996
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 18:44:34+00:00): Ciao Michele,

per convenzione in Italia scriviamo gli indirizzi senza separatore e con la minuscola, quindi 4g invece di 4/G, inoltre sempre per convenzione non associamo l'indirizzo al building ma inseriamo i dati come un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso/targhetta col numero. 

Benvenuto su OSM e grazie per il tuo prezioso contributo!
Michele Scuttari (2022-12-07 18:53:06+00:00): Grazie per l'informazione. Elimino l'area e inserisco il punto sull'ingresso.
Michele Scuttari (2022-12-07 19:00:32+00:00): Ho modificato aggiungendo un punto e richiesto la revisione. Tuttavia vedo che altre abitazioni nella zona erano state indicate come area. Mi confermi che è corretto la mia nuova versione?
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 19:02:49+00:00): Mi sono spiegato male io probabilmente, scusa.

Volevo dire che vanno separate le due cose, prima c'era una area che rappresentava l'edificio con le informazioni dell'indirizzo assieme, invece ci va un nodo con:

addr:city	Castellucchio
addr:housenumber	4g
addr:postcode	46014
addr:street	Via della Repubblica

e separatamente un area con
 
building house (se è una casa indipendente abitata da una sola famiglia)

se hai domande chiedi pure
Michele Scuttari (2022-12-07 19:08:06+00:00): Va bene, allora aspetto che la modifica venga approvata e poi riaggiungo l'area
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 19:11:23+00:00): Non c'è bisogno che venga approvata, richiedere la revisione è solo una formalità che segnala agli altri che non sei sicurissimo di ciò che hai fatto e vorresti una seconda opinione ma puoi mappare quanto vuoi :)
NieWnen (2022-12-06 16:16:25+00:00): openstreetmap.org/note/2989278