piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-06-14 12:51:36+00:00): Access no alleen gebruiken bij een totaal verbod. Dus het witte ronde bord met rode rand. anders niet met access=no beginnen.
Graag reactie
Remco Pasman (2018-06-14 13:01:00+00:00): hier staan geen borden
eggie (2018-06-14 13:17:13+00:00): Dan is het een track wanneer het niet geschikt is voor vierwielvoertuigen en anders een path.
Er staat hier in dit gedeelte veel meer op slot..Wellicht staat er aan het begin van het gebied een bord met tekst of een verkeersbord die de toegang aangeeft. mapse!
eggie (2018-06-14 13:37:53+00:00): herstel.. Het is een track wanneer het WEL geschikt is voor vierwielvoertuigen (ongeacht of ze er mogen komen of niet)
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
trial (2019-06-17 17:23:46+00:00): I've upgraded the bormer backery to a more standard schema: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71337706
eggie (2018-06-15 21:29:14+00:00): Probeer svp op de  adresnodes bij te taggen.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:41:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
OceanVortex (2018-07-01 14:51:28+00:00): I'm curious where this name is coming from. The source URL you provided is invalid. This is a private driveway for 197 Nahant Street, Wakefield, MA. There is no road sign at the end of it. According to the official Wakefield Assessor's database (http://wakefield.patriotproperties.com/default.asp) there is no Dean Road.
andreis_telenav (2018-07-10 05:51:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the feedback. I've removed the road name. Regarding the URL, it worked when we made the research for missing road name in the area. Best regards.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
goedegazelle (2018-08-11 09:14:57+00:00): A greenfield describes land scheduled for new development where there have been no buildings before. A greenfield is scheduled to turn into a construction site.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
kuhni74 (2021-10-11 13:31:08+00:00): Die Flur "Rohrberg" zwischen Sittendorf und Dornbach wurde meines Erachtens zurecht gelöscht, weil Rohrberg ist einiges weiter nördlich richtig verortet. Die Flur sollte gemäß Franzisco-Josephinischer Landesaufname und Franziszeischem Kataster Lutzfeld heißen. Woher kommt das mit "Rohrberg"?
Andresek59 (2021-10-11 13:59:41+00:00): Keine Ahnung mehr - es gibt den Gipfel Rohrberg zwischen Sittendorf und Sulz samt der südlich davon liegenden Gehöften mit gleichem Namen - ansonsten stammen sämtliche von mir eingegebenen Flurnamen aus der https://basemap.at/bmapp/index.html#{%22center%22:[1794789.819472797,6122139.108089828],%22zoom%22:13.797433162291636,%22rotation%22:0,%22layers%22:%220010000000%22} die kennt NÖ davon den Flurnamen "im Rohrberg"
kuhni74 (2021-10-11 14:06:32+00:00): Ja schon, aber all das ist einiges weiter nördlich und nicht südöstlich des Weinbergs. Ich erlaube mir das zu korrigieren. Die basemap ist übrigens bei Flurnamen leider oft sehr sehr mangelhaft (falsche Verortungen, falsche Schreibweisen).
Andresek59 (2021-10-11 14:14:19+00:00): passt schon, vor Jahren gab es kaum Flurnamen in der OSM und ich habe dann immer wieder die Basemap als Quelle herangezogen - im konkreten Fall war aber glaube ich der Flurnamen gar nicht von mir - den habe ich offensichtlich nur irrtümlich gelöscht und dann wieder eingefügt - wenn man das jetzt verbessert ist das ja OK und im Sinne eines WIKI-Projektes
kuhni74 (2021-10-11 14:27:18+00:00): Ah, verstehe! Danke! Ich vergleiche die basemap mittlerweile gern mit den historischen Karten auf mapire, wobei damals natürlich auch nicht immer perfekt gearbeitet wurde ;-)
fkv (2021-10-11 21:00:33+00:00): Mir ist ein Rätsel, warum in der Changeset-Beschreibung nur der Flurname Rohrberg erwähnt wird, wenn in dem Changeset noch erheblich mehr passiert ist. Was vermeintliche Flurnamen wie den Rohrberg betrifft, da sollte doch schon das Grundwort "-berg" zu denken geben. Wenn man sowas 1:1 als place=locality aus der Basemap abschreibt, tut man OSM damit nicht bereichern, sondern mit falschen Daten zumüllen. Aber das soll hier kein Vorwurf sein, denn - wie Andresek schon vermutet hat - der Node ist sowieso nicht von ihm. Er wurde anno 2007 als Dorf(!) angelegt. Damals wurden Dorf- und Bergnamen noch nach Schätzung in die leere Karte eingetragen.
kuhni74 (2021-10-12 08:56:10+00:00): Rohrberg ist durchaus die Bezeichnung für einen Weiler, aber halt weiter nördlich auf der Ostseite des Mödlingbachs. Mit Berg hat man seinerzeit nicht notwendigerweise Gipfel bezeichnet, sondern land- / forstwirtschaftlich genutzte Abhänge oder nicht im Tal liegende Ortschaften. Der zugehörige Gipfel heißt übrigens richtig Rohrkogel, habe das auch gestern berichtigt.
Mölln (2018-06-27 17:02:51+00:00): Hab die Änderungen angepasst. Die Baustelle ist noch länger dort. Danach kann nach Bebauungsplan gemäß die Karte vervollständigt werden. Bis dahin sind die Wege für Bürger gesperrt. Gruß, Oli_H
eggie (2018-06-14 12:53:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-14 12:55:16+00:00): Gebouwen zelf horen geen adresgegevens te bevatten. Die bevinden zich al op de adresnodes. Het adres kan er dus beter af.
Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-06-14 13:04:31+00:00): adresgegevens van gebouw verwijderd
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-15 12:43:52+00:00): #test #failed ?
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-15 12:43:46+00:00): #test #failed ?
eggie (2018-06-14 12:59:03+00:00): Je hebt hier adressen verplaatst. dat mag, maar je hebt ook adressen gecombineerd. Alle adresnodes zijn gewoon aanwezig, maar soms verstopt onder elkaar. Deze worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster en het verdient aanbeveling hier niets aan te wijzigen. 
Wanneer adressen niet kloppen kun je dit aan het Kadaster doorgeven.
elk kadaster gaat verschillend om met het plaatsen van hun adresnodes. Soms liggen er tientallen op elkaar.
Ik draai deze changeset terug om de adressen te herstellen. daarna kun je ze op de goed plaats leggen, maar absoluut geen adressen aanpassen.
eggie (2018-06-14 13:02:27+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #59844699
_PG_ (2021-08-11 20:50:19+00:00): Прошу объяснить, для чего созданы линии без тэгов, не входящие ни в одно отношение.
iWowik (2021-08-12 06:37:23+00:00): Так может отношения за три года исчезли
_PG_ (2021-08-12 06:41:44+00:00): А может их и не было.
Гляньте, что там с этими линиями. Может их надо удалить, а может откатить удаление релейшна.
iWowik (2021-08-12 07:33:59+00:00): Я что-то не вижу пустых веев
https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/59844076/download
 _PG_, Можете привести пример?
giskarta (2021-08-12 08:00:50+00:00): Я исправил
_PG_ (2021-08-12 08:41:44+00:00): Спасибо!
VictorIE (2026-02-26 18:36:53+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8381821

Apologies, an old edit. :)

Could I check what guid=27 means? It's an exceptionally rare tag.
santamariense (2018-06-15 13:10:44+00:00): Onde ficam estas cisternas (em que parte das casas)? Elas existem de fato? 
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596934012
 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597785309
.
Cisternas não são mapeadas como sendo lago (natural=water) para tal deve-se usar a tag man_made=cistern . Para isso no modo de edição, a esquerda, role para baixo até achar a edição manual de etiquetas. Exclua natural=water e adicione man_made=cistern. Solicito que faça as devidas correções e esclarecimentos.

E o que você quis representar com este lago? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597785311
smaprs (2018-06-15 15:23:59+00:00): E ali não aprecem cisternas na imagem.  
  
E aqui tem uma "piscina":  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597359694  
Ali não aparece uma piscina.  
Só um telhado.
viloan (2018-06-14 12:52:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2018-06-15 06:22:51+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Adding polygon features (enclosed area) with just area=yes or linear features (a line for a road maybe) both with no descriptive tags is of no benifit as neither are rendered. All features must be tagged in a manner that the database can interpret otherwise they are of no use. 
I would suggest going back and tagging all your added features otherwise none of them will ever be rendered, rather a waste of your time.
Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
highflyer74 (2018-06-15 12:37:10+00:00): Moin Roland5!

Vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag! Denke beim Eintragen von Telefon- und Faxnummern bitte an das internationale Format +49[Leerzeichen][Ortsvorwahl ohne "0"][Leerzeichen][Rufnummer ohne Leerzeichen]. Das Ganze ohne Striche, Klammern etc. In Deinem Fall fehlen die Leerzeichen.

Danke :-)
Roland5 (2018-06-20 08:51:44+00:00): Danke für den Kommentar. Ich hatte wohl noch E164 im Kopf, wo keinerlei Trennzeichen vorgesehen waren.
viloan (2018-06-14 13:19:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-14 14:08:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-14 14:10:26+00:00): Dag Knoorwagen.. oneway=no hoeft niet op reguliere wegen. dat zet je alleen als je bang bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
lakedistrict (2018-06-14 20:27:19+00:00): Does this resolve any of the nearby map notes?
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-14 14:11:37+00:00): Probeer duidelijk aan te geven wat je edist zijn svp. Dus correctie straatnaam.
BCNorwich (2018-06-14 17:01:24+00:00): Hello ans welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the address tags from the highway (address tags are meant for buildings), added a postal code tag (that's correct for a highway), thus the highway is to OSM practice. 
The Mews buildings could be drawn and addressed.
Regards Bernard.
SignHealth (2018-06-14 17:09:40+00:00): Thanks, Bernard. Still getting to grips with it. Will try to do the buildings.
BCNorwich (2018-06-15 05:53:34+00:00): Glad to help, if you need help please just ask, or there's plenty of guides/info on the web and several OSM forums.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-14 14:13:03+00:00): Surface paved en maxspeed  zou voldoende zijn. Die andere tags zijn overbodig.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-14 14:13:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-14 14:15:31+00:00): Nuttige bijdrage.. footway=sidewalk kan er weer af.  de straatnaam kan er wel op.
Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-06-14 17:16:26+00:00): PB contact
iz11 (2018-06-14 17:59:03+00:00): Szia!
Szerintem mind a három útnál indokolt volt az access=no tag.
„Vízmű védőterület. Idegeneknek belépni szigorúan tilos!”  táblák vannak 
fénykép:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/vWFQRygv9HVF3U4v7
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-06-15 07:15:26+00:00): Hello!
Hát igen, ez egy trükkös kérdés. Én az OSM wiki alapján úgy értelmeztem, hogy az access=no mindenfajta egyéb idevágó tag nélkül olyan útszakaszokat jelöl, ahova semmilyen módon nem lehet bejutni (pl le van zárva szalagkorláttal, betontömbbel, belógó villanyvezetékkel, stb). Jelen esetben pl. a vízmű dolgozói használhatják ezt az utat, tehát szerintem inkább az access=private esetleg permissive a helyénvaló. De nyitott vagyok a további diskurzusra.
iz11 (2018-06-15 07:57:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=no?uselang=en

„The access=no tag indicates that the object is not to be used by the general public, with stronger interdiction than the access=private tag.”

Ez alapján, szerintem önmagában az access=no nem azt jelenti, hogy semmilyen módon nem lehet bejutni. Példaként katonai területek és kormánylétesítmények szerepelnek
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-06-15 09:37:49+00:00): Akkor itt mutatkozik némi ellentmondás a wiki-n belül (az access=* -al szemben). Bár ez a konkrét telep eléggé a határesete a kormánylétesítménynek, de ok, minősítsük annak, mert valahol stratégiai fontosságú és visszacsinálom.
A jövőre nézve elfogadható-e ez a felosztás?
- access=no : katonai létesítmények, kormánylétesítmények és stratégia fontosságú állami létesítmények (erőművek, fontosabb közműtelepek (víz,gáz,villany, kommunikáció) ,stb.)

- access = private : magánlétesítmények, nem stratégiai fontosságú állami létesítmények (szennyvíztelep, szeméttelep, stb.)
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].