piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MuntiiNostri (2019-05-28 05:12:00+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your observation. In future edits we will do as you have suggested and pay more attention to not duplicate existing paths. We will  fix the segments where we added the mentioned duplicates but in cases where there are more variants on field of the same track, we will keep them.
Concerning the mentioned GPS tracks, they can be freely downloaded one by one from the www.muntii-nostri.ro  website. They were registered on field, but corrected and processed in the office, so they miss the timestamp and cannot be uploaded in OSM as GPS traces, only as custom map data layer while editing.
BáthoryPéter (2019-05-28 09:31:56+00:00): Thank you for the fast response!

Let me suggest to use JOSM editor for mapping. ArcGIS OSM plugin has very limited capabilities. iD editor is better but focused to beginner users. JOSM is a full featured editor with advanced tools like "improve way accuracy mode", plus a tons of plugins.

Regarding GPX upload: It's very easy to add fake timestamps. Open the GPX in a text editor and replace "</trkpt>" with " <time>1970-01-01T00:00:00Z</time>  </trkpt>" (or a date around your survey).

By the way, feel free to upload your unprocessed, original GPS traces. Everybody do this.

Bonus question: did you use RTK GPS devices?
MuntiiNostri (2019-05-28 09:59:24+00:00): Thanks for your advice!
Concerning your question: our tracks are  registered with common GPS devices.
Qantas94Heavy (2019-05-27 12:04:57+00:00): The building removed has been demolished as the Sydney Metro Northwest temporary site office is no longer needed.
osmviborg (2019-05-27 12:47:24+00:00): Hvad er formålet med denne node? Hvad er meningen med "DK" på residential området?
Jordi MF (2019-05-27 16:59:46+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por añadir información nueva a OpenStreetMap. Desde la comunidad de OSM hemos visto que en tu primera edición has añadido una serie de edificios. Sin embargo, has cometido algunos errores (es normal si es tu primera vez). Fíjate que los edificios no comprenden toda la zona ajardinada de la propiedad y tú has marcado como edificio el jardín de cada vivienda unifamiliar. Intenta que el borde del edificio coincida con la parte inferior del edificio (según la ortofoto de la capa de PNOA). Otra opción es usar la capa de Catastro para seguir la línea que delimita los edificios.

Te invitamos a aplicar estas mejoras en tu próxima edición. Muchas gracias y saludos.

PD: También te recomendamos que consultes la wiki de OpenStreetMap de España para resolver más dudas.
Frans S (2019-05-27 13:28:14+00:00): Hi,  I've seen your marking bad imagery
Check MAXAR imageries as well. Very clear
Best regards
utack (2019-06-17 09:01:47+00:00): Vielleicht passt office=it besser?  
office 	it 	Knoten oder Punkt Fläche oder Gebiet 	Büro oder Sitz eines IT-Unternehmens bzw. eines Computerfachmannes (Software)
WolKor (2019-06-19 13:18:58+00:00): Habe office=it gesetzt
eggie (2019-05-27 13:52:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Ik heb bicycle use_sidepath van het fietspad Oude Oxersteeg verwijderd en ook bicycle-designated. 

Ook een klein opgeplakt stukje lege way heb ik verwijderd van het noordelijke deel Oude Oxersteeg
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 13:54:20+00:00): ... nu dan Akkerdistel.
aceman444 (2019-11-03 18:38:48+00:00): Zdravim, aka "linka" by to mala byt v budove univerzity?
skrovina (2019-11-04 07:00:24+00:00): dátova, optická, SANET
kayle (2019-11-04 10:58:54+00:00): Heh, ale pipeline je na transport tekutín/plynu nie pre jednotky a nuly :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline
Na telekomunikačné linky je toto značenie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:communication%3Dline
aceman444 (2019-11-04 20:40:15+00:00): Veru, pipeline je potrubie. Tiez ta linka zacina v bode "centrum", ktory ma len nazov, ale nema urceny typ o co ide. Na druhom konci linka konci v stene budovy. Tiez je asi na zvazenie, ci takato sukromna infrastruktura ma nejaky vyznam v OSM.
dieterdreist (2019-05-28 15:12:03+00:00): Hi Road-Runner,
you lost the name: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6498943085/history
(Todis)
Road–Runner (2019-05-30 10:04:30+00:00): Ah ja, danke dir.
dieterdreist (2019-05-30 12:29:22+00:00): keine Ursache :)
user_5359 (2019-05-27 15:43:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
tbarthelet (2020-05-05 17:52:15+00:00): Mobigo est le nom du réseau de transport de la région.
Ici c'est la RDTJ (Jurabus), devenue une antenne de la SPL Mobilités BFC.
eggie (2019-05-27 14:11:42+00:00): Review.. Het nw stukje ambachtweg heb je gedeeltelijk op het andere stuk geplakt. We noemen dat duplicated way tagging. Dat routeert niet goed. Daar moet je dus een stukje aanpassen.
Hier kun je dat zien.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70662749
Doe je het zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 14:12:38+00:00): Het zuidelijk stukje wat je nieuw hebt ingetekend overlapt ook nog het oude deel Ambachtsweg. Dus ook aanpassen svp.
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 15:38:37+00:00): duplicated ways verwijderd
Supaplex (2019-05-27 15:40:37+00:00): 地址斷詞怪怪，一般不加里在addr:district裡
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70662939
Supaplex (2019-05-27 15:41:11+00:00): 鄰也不加在addr:street裡
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70662939
yellowsoar (2019-05-27 15:47:33+00:00): 不把里加在addr:district的來源？
Supaplex (2019-05-27 18:20:10+00:00): 算是資料慣例了。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
參考了，看有沒有適合的tag，不然就要自創了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70662939
Kogacarlo (2019-05-30 01:42:51+00:00): Ik heb de naam van de spoorbrug in Venlo weer terug veranderd naar Spoorbrug. Hier is niemand die zegt "nemen we de Stadsbrug of de Spoorbrug Venlo?"
Iedereen heeft het over Spoorbrug. De toevoeging "Venlo" hoeft niet er bij want iedereen snapt dat het niet de Spoorbrug van Arnhem is.
aharvey (2019-05-28 04:32:00+00:00): although not wrong to add Shell Beach as a multipolygon, it may be simpler to just have that small section of way overlapping to keep it as a simple closed way.
JamesHester (2019-05-28 04:45:05+00:00): I couldn't see how to add an overlapping section to a relation in JOSM, so I split the way to create a little extra section. I also did this for the neighbouring wood.
trigpoint (2019-05-27 14:28:10+00:00): Hi Staggy, ATMs are usually found in built up or areas with a high footfall. This seems a bit unlikely n'est pas?
Cheers Phil
Staggy (2019-05-27 14:34:58+00:00): Hi I didn't realise this is shared sorry for any inconvenience
trigpoint (2019-05-27 14:45:20+00:00): Thank you for replying, I have reverted all of your additions.
I am told there is a bookmark feature in maps.me which may be a better option.
Cheers Phil
Staggy (2019-05-27 14:49:34+00:00): I am in the process of changing them now to something more suitable
trigpoint (2019-05-27 15:42:01+00:00): They are not viewponts either, they appear to be just points along a walk which we do not map in OSM. 
For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504106785 seems to be just a point where a footpath meets a road. Is there something here that I am missing?
There needs to be a physical feature to be mapped.
Cheers Phil
SHARCRASH (2019-05-27 14:20:28+00:00): + tag corrections
multimodaal (2020-08-03 17:28:30+00:00): Hoi, de in deze changeset toegevoegde tags zijn onlangs verwijderd en door mij weer hersteld, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88796623
tux67 (2019-05-28 06:10:17+00:00): Hi, das fehlte das building tag und ich würde empfehlen das amenity tag auf die gesamtfläche des Kindergartens ( anstatt ans Gebäude )zu setzen, wenn klar ist wie die aussieht. Den Landuse hab' ich auch mal angepasst.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70664016
reigi (2019-05-28 11:30:33+00:00): Danke für die Tipps. Ich fahre mir den Bereich mal ansehen
andrewwiseman (2019-05-31 18:43:08+00:00): Hi Mahamane Abdoulkader. Thanks for mapping in Niger recently. I noticed there are some issues in the recent uploads related to these changesets: [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70664388 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70665060] that resulted in a lot of overlaps here: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644579240) and here:(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326644920).

There are some useful wiki pages that contain a lot of information for mapping in OSM such as; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Guide; & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Video_tutorials#JOSM_video_collection. Also there was a tertiary downgraded to track that is of very good quality and connects to smaller sized urban developments. I would suggest looking at the country specific highway modeling page for any country you may be mapping in, such as (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa) and looking into the history of the way [CNTL+H] for insight into the status of a highway’s classification. Thanks again for mapping!


Francias:

Bonjour Mahamane Abdoulkader. Merci pour la cartographie au Niger récemment. J'ai remarqué quelques problèmes dans les récents téléchargements liés à ces changesets: [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70664388 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70665060] qui ont entraîné beaucoup de se chevauche ici: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644579240) et ici: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326644920).

Il existe des pages wiki utiles contenant de nombreuses informations pour la cartographie dans OSM, telles que; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Guide; & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Video_tutorials#JOSM_video_collection. Il y avait aussi un tertiaire dégradé de très bonne qualité et relié à des développements urbains de plus petite taille. Je suggérerais de regarder la page de modélisation de route spécifique à un pays pour n'importe quel pays dans lequel vous êtes en train de cartographier, telle que (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa) et de regarder l'histoire du chemin [CNTL + H] pour avoir un aperçu du statut de la classification d'une autoroute. Merci encore pour la cartographie!
multimodaal (2020-08-03 17:35:50+00:00): Hoi, tags die je in deze changeset aan een railway hebt toegevoegd zijn onlangs verwijderd, ik heb ze hersteld en de mapper in kwestie aangesproken op dit onwenselijke "onttaggen" for the renderer https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88796655

Groet
A67-A67 (2020-08-05 13:21:00+00:00): Bedankt voor de oplettendheid en het herstellen!
eggie (2022-09-07 10:36:52+00:00): Hoi A67 A67  Ik ga steeds verder in de historie terug.
Betreft Wilhelminabrug. Weet jij hoe het zit?
Waar komt die oneway=yes vandaan?  En dan in alle jaren is hier onconsistente tagging ontstaan. Daar kom ik niet meer uit en mapper Lilia ook niet vermoed ik. 
Zie 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=871287#p871287

oneway=yes of oneway=no  Thats the question?

Zie https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7090361

en

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LiliaAngelova/history#map=4/40.34/46.30

Groet
eggie
Nakaner-repair (2019-05-29 09:26:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70725871 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 70664569. The changeset changed the Arabian Peninsula from a peninsula to a gigant water polygon and changed a natural=strait to natural=water. This makes the whole Arabian Peninsula become blue.
Nakaner (2019-05-29 09:34:28+00:00): Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap. I am sorry but it is not possible to keep this changeset. You changed the Arabian Peninsula from a peninsula into a giant lake which is both wrong and makes all map tiles in this area become blue. In addition, your change to the Strait of Homs is wrong as well because it is a strait, not a water area. Sea is not mapped as polygons in OpenStreetMap. Instead we map the coastline as linestrings.

Please be carefule when editing large polygons.

Best regards

Michael
Hjart (2019-05-27 16:27:00+00:00): Stierne foran bygningerne er vel ikke hvad vi normalt forstår ved gågader?
tux67 (2019-05-28 06:16:11+00:00): Hi - du hattest das Gate auf den Landuse gesetzt. Ich habe jetzt eine servicezufahrt mit parkplatzweg hinzugefügt und das Gate darauf gesetzt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70665269
lmagreault (2019-05-28 15:08:19+00:00): D'après le site de la commune (https://choux-jura.fr/appel-a-candidature-qui-veut-reprendre-lauberge-de-choux/), l'auberge est actuellement fermée en attente d'un repreneur. On pourrait donc utiliser le tag shop=vacant et was:shop=restaurant tant qu'elle est fermée ?
Source : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nantes/Projets/Commerces
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70665535
Spokester (2019-05-28 15:23:26+00:00): Oui tout à fait. Je ne savais pas comment signifier qu'elle était fermée alors j'avais juste mis opening_hours=closed
user_5359 (2019-05-27 15:41:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the property: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34230551/history? This was also marked as church.
Minh Nguyen (2021-10-01 01:22:01+00:00): Hi, what you deleted were actually the details that allow some maps to show the St. Peter in Chains building in 3D. The editor you were using didn’t recognize 3D building parts at the time, so I’m sure it looked like a mess, but it’s better now. I’ve undone your changes in changeset 111940282. In a short while, you’ll be able to see what it looks like in F4Map for example:

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=39.1035912&lon=-84.5191434&zoom=19
PT-53 (2019-06-02 05:16:47+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an diesem Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125244482/history - der nur 2 Knoten hatte - einen Knoten gelöscht und an dem verbliebenen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1391748474/history entrence=yes + access=yes eingetragen.
Nun ist da ein "Way'" der nur noch einen Knoten hat, was im OSM-Inspector bemängelt wird:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.83090&lat=47.68929&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way
Löscht Du den Way noch bitte?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-23 06:10:34+00:00): Erledigt
Alecs01 (2019-05-27 18:09:21+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, per disegnare strade ed edifici ti consiglio, anzichè Bing, di usare (dal menu sfondo a destra) Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta oppure PCN 2012. Sono immagini più vecchie (ma se sei della zona sai già cosa è cambiato di recente) ma più nitide e meglio allineate con i tracciati GPS (si nota dove ce ne sono alcuni).
Non so cosa suggerisca ID per casi come questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6503514875 ma di norma le stazioni di ricarica per auto elettriche sono mappate così https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Minh Nguyen (2021-10-01 01:23:03+00:00): Changeset 70665554 had eviscerated this relation by mistake, leaving just one of the members in tact. I’ve reverted that changeset and this one in changeset 111940282 to restore the full 3D building.
aquarix (2019-05-27 23:02:00+00:00): Hallo,
ich schätze mal bei dem einen Hydrant im Wald ist eine 0 zu viel. Ich kenne jedenfalls keine Bauart mit 1 m Durchmesser. ;-)
Gruß aquarix
joerg_s (2019-05-28 11:18:20+00:00): Hallo aquarix,
auf dem Hinweisschild zum Hydranten steht definitv H1000.
Und das ist doch der Durchmesser.
Gruß Jörg
aquarix (2019-06-01 13:15:49+00:00): Das scheint wohl tatsächlich zu stimmen weil weiter nördlich gibt es auch noch Hydranten mit ähnlich großen Durchmesserangaben. Da läuft wohl eine enorm dicke Hauptwasserleitung durch den Wald.
solmaps2 (2019-12-10 13:14:48+00:00): another map roulette challenge sent me here ! haha https://maproulette.org/challenge/9712/task/27174722

it says this is a floating way, hmmm...
angys (2019-12-10 14:10:49+00:00): just ignore this lol
Palolo (2019-06-26 04:08:55+00:00): Thank you for the help. Please work to make square corners on the buildings. The instructions show how.
m@rio (2019-06-09 10:41:37+00:00): Cześć, na północ od dużego boiska zmapowałeś obszar bez oznaczenia tagów z uliczką dojazdową. Z ortofoto nie jestem w stanie zidentyfikować co to może być. Jakbyś znalazł chwilę, żeby to oznaczyć przy okazji.
Pzdr :)
emvee (2020-09-21 06:53:23+00:00): Ik kwam lijst van Osmose warnings https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3410384 tegen ("route relation without route tag") blijkbaar omdat ik een weg die onderdeel is van die relatie heb aangepast.

Eens even gekeken en het is me niet helemaal duidelijk maar zou het niet inmiddels (we zijn 1.5 jaar verder) beter zijn deze relaties weg te gooien?

Groeten,

Martin.
emvee (2020-09-27 09:52:32+00:00): Maar de beslissing genomen om deze misbruikte relaties weg te gooien, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91576449
trigpoint (2019-05-28 10:02:28+00:00): Is this really a viewpoint?

What are you trying to map here?

Cheers Phil
Staggy (2019-05-28 10:13:14+00:00): It's a point for me to get to and as I said I didn't realise its shared with others I thought it would be just on my app
trigpoint (2019-05-28 10:28:05+00:00): Maps.me has a bookmark function for storing points that you do not want to add to OSM.
Staggy (2019-05-28 10:33:59+00:00): I am using bookmark
Staggy (2019-05-28 10:36:45+00:00): I use the feature add place to map then I press bookmark maybe this is wrong then
trigpoint (2019-05-28 11:01:36+00:00): You should be adding to the map, that causes it to be added to openstreetmap.
I am told you need to do a long press on the location and then tap the bookmark button in the bottom left corner.
HTH Phil
Staggy (2019-05-28 11:12:28+00:00): I have just tried your way on the start of penterry lane if you cant see this then this must be the way
trigpoint (2019-05-28 11:16:45+00:00): Thank you, that looks like the right way.

Cheers Phil
Staggy (2019-05-28 11:22:35+00:00): Great thanks
Staggy (2019-05-28 12:49:49+00:00): I have changed the ones by st Mary's church off penterry lane could you check if they have gone please
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:28:11+00:00): Hello SarahO1
Thanks for your contribution. I'm marking this task invalid as the mappings on the majority of houses is not correct. You need to trace the outline of the building. Have a look at the 'Learn' pages, and this guide on mapping in iD Editor: http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
On This webpage you can see the way you mapped buildings. ( in general they are strict rectangular)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70667762

Please read the instructions on the project as well. There has been asked for the MAXAR P imagery. You used the Bing imagery which is very old and outdated,
So there are many more buildings to be mapped, 
Always square the buildings you map with the Q key in iDedtior.
Did you not see the warnings on the Editor when you  mapped 2 buildings over each other ? You could solve that very easily. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:51:36+00:00): We appreciate your help, but would ask that you please follow the instructions to make square corners on the buildings.
eggie (2019-05-27 17:08:31+00:00): Dag tomtor..
Tip: 
Parallelvoetpaden mappen we alleen op plaatsen waar er een groenstrook tussen trottoir en fietspad zit. Op de plaatsen waar het trottoir grenst neem je de tag van voetpad op in het fietspad met sidewalk=right. Het zou anders niet goed routeren, want je kunt immers overal  van het voetpad het fietspad opstappen.
....sidewalks wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Sidewalks


Gr eggie
tomtor (2019-05-27 17:36:35+00:00): Ah dank je. Fixed...
chillly (2020-10-18 17:05:04+00:00): The new residential you added is definately a driveway (highway=service, service = driveway).  I have changed it
marc__marc (2024-09-26 22:25:57+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding this missing terraced building.
feel free to split the building to have one object per addr:housenumber.

Regards,
Marc
GOwin (2019-07-27 08:29:47+00:00): hi there. I'm curious about these polygon features you've been adding with fclass=building tags. Could you elaborate on them? If you're trying to add buildings, you seem to be duplicating features already existing in OSM.
user_5359 (2019-05-28 18:53:17+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! I take a look on different aerail image, but I can't see a covered bridge with. I can't see the necessary of the layer=-2 tag and of the relation! Did you really know what you have done?
rivermont (2019-10-19 18:59:49+00:00): Nope. Fixed in changeset #75937431.
glibbertorsten (2019-05-27 19:36:37+00:00): Hallo! Ist das Boot denn jetzt echt weg?!
Danny83 (2019-05-27 20:01:49+00:00): Ja, bin heute da vorbeikommen und es liegt nicht mehr da.
glibbertorsten (2019-05-27 20:10:01+00:00): Der Klapperkutter... Bestimmt wegen der Bauarbeiten. Also danke und Gruß
Danny83 (2019-05-27 20:27:44+00:00): Ich denke, der Kutter musste für die geplante Steganlage weichen. 
https://www.pnn.de/potsdam/23853032.html
b-jazz (2019-05-28 03:08:15+00:00): This doesn't appear to be in the right location. At the very least, it might not be a business that people would visit, so it probably shouldn't be at that location.
user_5359 (2019-05-28 18:49:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Kovoschiz (2019-05-27 22:23:19+00:00): Hi. `crossing_ref=zebra` is inappropriate here. I used `crossing:zebra` as the zebra stripe markings doesn't reflect its status as a zebra crossing.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-27 22:24:25+00:00): It is most likely an `uncontrolled` but with zebra markings.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-27 22:27:51+00:00): (In Hong Kong `crossing=zebra` and the previous `crossing_ref=zebra` documents zebra crossings which has clear facility standards and pedestrian priority)
Kovoschiz (2019-05-27 22:28:59+00:00): Ie `crossing:zebra=yes` means there is zebra marking here. This is to not confuse mappers with the tags.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-27 22:36:19+00:00): "marked" crossings would be ambiguous as well here.
mueschel (2019-05-28 07:47:33+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the explanation. Could you write a documentation about it?
Instead of a new tag you might want to look into "road_marking"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:road_marking
(Please note that there is a spelling mistake in the proposed "pedastrian_crossing_rectangle" - 'zebra' would be quite appropriate there, I think)
Kovoschiz (2019-05-28 09:42:30+00:00): Thanks for the tip! I
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70670861
4004 (2019-05-27 21:21:01+00:00): it is actually the official opening hours, i'll retag
eggie (2019-05-27 20:36:05+00:00): Dag Valkjes.. 
Tip:
Water en landuse is best lastig. Eigenlijk hoort het water netjes ingebed te worden in de landuse. In JOSM kun je een plugin downloaden die dat water keurig uitsnijdt. 

PolygonCutOut
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=723861#p723861
MVG,
Eggie
Bexhill-OSM (2019-05-27 23:01:34+00:00): Hmm this is probably a more sensible way to tag multiple images.  I'll see if I can implement that into the Bexhill Map project. Thanks.
BHiko (2020-03-27 09:38:05+00:00): Dag.
In deze wijzigingsset voegde je een weg toe. Ik was onlangs ter plaatse en zag die weg helemaal niet. Kan je checken/toelichten? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692826124
user_5359 (2019-05-28 18:47:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare  .