piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SGorskiy (2020-11-05 03:47:40+00:00): Уважаемый. Точка с почтой уже есть на карте: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/941270209
Pichintún (2021-09-07 15:42:46+00:00): Are you sure about this track? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866743797/history doesn't even look like path on imagery ...
felipeeugenio (2020-11-03 19:15:30+00:00): Estimado. Vemos que borra un colegio que está en San Carlos. Ya no existe?
saludos
felipeeugenio (2020-11-03 19:16:53+00:00): Además, por favor no pegar los parques a las calles. estaban bien así. gracias
salve100 (2020-11-03 19:18:52+00:00): con respecto a la primera pregunta, el Liceo Nuestra Señora de la Merced aun esta aca, solo elimine la antigua construccion que se me olvido borrar, ya que la mejore

y la especto a la dos, ok.
toyotagps (2020-11-14 04:58:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94094922 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping. - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93499185
literan (2020-11-05 17:51:15+00:00): добрый день. Просто старые дома - не достопримечательность (туда не возят туристов на автобусах). И историческое название - это не name здания (используйте тег heritage:name, например). В тег name записывается сегодняшнее общеупотребительное имя объекта. Вот "Пашков дом" - это name, его и сейчас все так называют. А какой-нибудь "Доходный дом купца Толстопузова" - это не общеупотребительное имя.
RicoElectrico (2020-11-03 19:27:59+00:00): Cześć, taka mała uwaga: tu jest osiedle, więc drogi prowadzą do domów. W takim przypadku użycie highway=track (w edytorze iD: kategoria "droga polna lub leśna") jest błędne. Niektórzy w ten sposób oznaczali / oznaczają drogi gruntowe, a to oznacza się po prostu ustawiając odpowiednią nawierzchnię (surface=*). Drogi prowadzące do domów to highway=residential ("droga lokalna"). Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Mam nadzieję, że to będzie przydatna informacja - bo niestety nie wszystkie dane jakie się zastaje w OSM są prawidłowe ;) Jeśli znasz tę okolicę, to śmiało poprawiaj track na residential, względnie unclassified jeśli jest to droga nieprzechodząca przez osiedle i łączy miejscowości. W przypadkach wątpliwych możesz spytać na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23

Miłego wieczora!
skyper (2020-11-03 20:31:18+00:00): Salli

Jetzt warst Du eine Stunde schneller.

Bis Du Dir sicher, dass es an der Messe nur eine stop_area ist?

Laut GTFS der VAG sind es zwei. Die alten direkt an der Straße "de:08311:30425:0:*" und die neuen abseits der Straße "de:08311:30234:0:*".

Grüße skyper
!bm (2020-11-03 19:38:50+00:00): Aus meiner Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63708502 :

Ich denke, es ist wieder so ein Grenzfall (wie auch im Wiki als Alternative angeführt), aber advertising=* statt tourism=... scheint mir hier das geeignetere Schema zu sein, da die Galerie im Körnerpark hier ihre Ausstellungen/Veranstaltungen bewirbt und eher nicht eine Community? (Mag aber sein, dass das nur momentan der Fall ist.) So oder so – das Tagging sollte hier vereinheitlicht werden. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aadvertising%3Dboard
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:message
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/message#values

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3AKey%3Aboard_type
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/board_type#values
!bm (2020-11-04 01:48:06+00:00): done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93508737
RicoElectrico (2020-11-03 19:31:38+00:00): Cześć, lepszym opisem by było "zmiana klasy drogi", bo to dokładnie zostało zrobione. Argumentacja zmiany też byłaby przydatna.
Robercin (2020-11-03 19:53:05+00:00): To prawda. Akurat robiłem serię zestawów zmian w różnych miejscach mapy i użyłem do nich ogólnego wspólnego opisu, żeby za każdym razem nie wpisywać opisu na nowo.
RicoElectrico (2020-11-03 19:36:47+00:00): Hi, could you share your consistency checks for milestones? The Polish community would surely thank you. Please describe your milestone edits on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 so we could help you. We had a milestone campaign a few years ago, but it has "lost steam" since then.

Thanks!
stanton (2020-11-05 21:19:08+00:00): Hi and thanks for getting in touch. Unfortunately my Polish is nonexistent, so I will just reply here. Feel free to distribute as you wish!
I am mostly focusing on roads with an extra letter suffix, i.e. sections numbered independently from the rest.
My main source of information are the traffic reports at https://www.gddkia.gov.pl/dane/zima_html/utrdane.xml (linked from dane.gov.pl, search for “utrudniena na drogach”, open data as per the web site). They have the road ref as well as the start kmp and length, which allows us to infer the minimal length of that particular segment (highest sum of start kmp + length ever observed). There is also usually a coordinate pair near the start, but that can be several hundreds of meters off.
I usually check if that is consistent with already-mapped milestones. So, if near the position for S42x km0 I see a milestone with distance=0, ref=S42, I know the stretch starting there is S42x, and I add the ref to the milestines—until the highest sum of start kmp + length I have seen so far, or for as long as the numbering is contiguous, or until the end of the section which was completed at the same time.
If there are no milestones, I check Mapillary or OpenStreetCam for footage and map the milestones.
The S5k is a particular case, as there is no footage, so I had to approximate the milestones (the only time I did this so far): kmp 0 is near Mosina, at the end of S5e (for which the highest observed kmp is 17.480, close to the position reported for S5k, km 0). There were milestones but the numbering was just a continuation of S5e, so I left the milestones and subtracted 17.5 km from the distance. The highest kmp I observed on S5k is 34.619, which would then be around Lipno, where S5f starts (not at km 0, though: kilometric points seem to be a continuation of S5e, starting around km 52).
There’s still a potentially large error in this particular case (I got three positions for different kmps from GDDKiA, and they disagree by as much as one km), but better than what we had before and sufficient for me to process traffic reports at “S5k, km 0 to 18.900” to an approximate coordinate pair. Of course, if someone can survey this stretch and either correct the milestones or upload imagery to Mapillary, that would be even better.
If anybody happens to have a list of “suffixed” road refs (with a trailing letter) which we can officially use for OSM, that would be even better; even if it just covers a part of Poland. I have suggested this to dane.gov.pl as a new data set (GDDKiA should have that data; I know for a fact they have it at least for some voivodeships, they would just need to release it under a free and open license); we’ll see what comes out of it.
naveenpf (2020-11-04 00:01:15+00:00): No capital letters in name tag. 
Capital letters are considered as 'shouting'.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93500124
Arun Madhavan (2020-11-04 05:04:49+00:00): Hi Vishnu, thanks for the contribution. Pls note that you should not be using ALL CAPITALS when you give names. Also do note write GOVT wite Government - Operator for govt schools in Kerala are Directorate of General Education
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93500242
naveenpf (2020-11-04 00:01:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93500272
cquest (2020-11-04 08:52:09+00:00): Bonjour,

un way ajouté sans tags... je l'ai complété vu qu'il ressemble à un petit bâtiment.

Merci aussi d'ajouter un commentaire sur vos groupes de modification comme signalé sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93501184
highflyer74 (2021-04-06 07:38:56+00:00): Moin!

Mir fiel dieser CS auf, da Du diese Punkte importiert hast und sie einige Fehler aufweisen.

Zum einen ist zwingend erforderlich, dass die Quelle der Daten benannt wird und für OSM lizenzrechtlich erlaubt ist. Siehe hierzu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines.

Dann haben die Daten Fehler, wie z.B. einen leeren Wert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8078975854) oder den falschen Schlüssel id=*. In OSM verwenden wir hierfür ref=*. Darauf wurdest Du auch hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93501067 von einem anderen Mapper hingewiesen.

Sei so nett, direkt hier im Changeset zu antworten, damit wir gemeinsam die Lage klären können.

Danke!
cnaumann (2021-04-06 09:00:12+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise, ich dachte schon alle falschen ID korrigiert zu haben. Daten kommen von einer eigenen Liste, die wir aus Foto‘s herausgeschrieben hatten. Die Ref-Nummern verweisen auf das FW-Tool in Sachsen in dem wir die Daten ebenfalls Pflegen müssen. Modifikationen mache ich meist über osmHydrant.
highflyer74 (2021-04-06 11:37:03+00:00): Hallo nochmal und danke für Deine Rückmeldung und die Klarstellung.

Dir waren noch zwei Hydranten durch die Lappen gegangen, die habe ich noch schnell umgebaut.

Schönen Tag!
Frans S (2020-11-04 11:49:52+00:00): Hello.  Sorry to say;
Your mappings here are far below par
oversized and clustered. 
I have to remove these mappings.
Please map them again more accurate.
This is task 1703
See my other message about mapping
user_5359 (2020-11-10 05:18:44+00:00): Hello! the standard key for a reference number is ref instead id. Please change this key.
Axelos (2021-03-17 18:59:03+00:00): Pourquoi avoir mis « service » sur ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140740160 ?
cyel (2021-03-17 19:13:29+00:00): Car elle n'a pas de nom à proprement parler. 
Une rue résidentielle doit avoir un nom et des maisons aux alentours ce qui n'est pas le cas ici.
Il est tout de même possible de la remettre en résidentielle avec un nom à vérifier sur le terrain.
Cette modification peut tout à fait être re-modifié et amélioré comme tout autre donnée sur OSM. C'est ce qui fait la force d'OpenStreetMap.
cquest (2020-11-04 08:47:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour celui-ci, name="zone en construction", n'est pas un nom mais une description qu'on a déjà explicitement par le landuse=construction.

Je l'ai donc retiré, ainsi que le way non fermé et sans aucun tag...

Il n'y a par ailleurs aucune source de mentionnée, ni sur l'objet créé, ni sur le groupe de modifications.

D'une façon générale, vos groupes de modification (changesets) sont quasiment tous sans aucun descriptif. Merci de faire un petit effort pour permettre aux autres contributeurs de comprendre vos contributions.
Frans S (2020-11-04 11:37:40+00:00): Hello
See my general PM about mappings
Here you should map more precise
A building is more than just a rectangular.

When mapping a residential area, please don't connect them to buildings.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-11-04 11:34:23+00:00): Addition to my PM
Please avoid to connect nodes of the building to a highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93501649
Frans S (2020-11-05 11:05:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s
TASK 2692 needs to be adjusted
Can you take care of that ?

success with mapping
Oguzhan Er (2020-11-06 10:09:05+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thanks for the video. I mapped buildings with the most up to date (31/10/2020) imagery which is taken by one Turkish institute. There is a little offset between this one and the default imagery (Maxar Premium). But thanks for your feedback.
I’m going İzmir now to arrange a mapathon and collect street-level imageries via mapillary (all events will last till Sunday night).
So if I can find any spare time you can be sure that I’ll spend it on task 2692.
mariotomo (2020-11-06 20:36:51+00:00): Hola. vives en el área? te quieres asomar al grupo? es útil tener los nombres de las calles, pero, de donde sale el conocimiento?
BigKev97 (2021-02-12 16:27:43+00:00): Mapas de otras fuentes de Internet como Google Maps, Here Maps y Waze.
mariotomo (2021-02-12 16:36:34+00:00): wow.  big, big, big "oops"!
marczoutendijk (2020-11-03 20:53:03+00:00): The method I used for this MP:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93680361
with this touching inners:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866773514

Is according to method 2 described at the talk page:the number (4) is the border shared by the farmland and the vineyard.
2. Draw a closed way over (2) and (4), tag it to be farmland. Draw a closed way over (3) and (4), tag it to be a vineyard. Draw a closed way over (1) and another over (3),(2) (overlapping parts of the closed ways already drawn), add the former closed way as outer, the latter as inner to a MP for the forest.
Frans S (2020-11-04 11:11:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
See my PM about  your mappings
Best regards
Max-Kritic (2020-11-04 13:37:46+00:00): 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.41909&lat=50.37935&zoom=9&opacity=0.68

Utilise JOSM !
Frans S (2020-11-05 13:01:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
j numminen (2020-11-04 06:51:47+00:00): Hello Ilkka, I don't think you were necessarily asking for help here but I'll offer advice. I think we should have a “Cycle & Foot Crossing” as the way type on this way[1]. Alternatively, one could just manually set the data field highway=cycleway. The reason is to have a complete network for bicycle routing.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866782575
Frans S (2020-11-04 10:38:18+00:00): Hello. See my comments on a PM
mariotomo (2021-04-04 17:14:08+00:00): hola. thank you for helping mapping Panamá.  I do have a perplexity: why you chose "tertiary", we generally do that based on whether the road is used by public transport. in that case we also mark as "tertiary" the part that crosses the settlements.
mariotomo (2021-10-07 14:08:58+00:00): hi, thank you for correcting the category of relevant through roads wrongly tagged as "residential". you could extend the use outside the residential areas, for continuity. there should be some wiki page hinting at this, if you find it, please link it here. ciao, grazie! hartelijk dank.
mariotomo (2020-11-05 16:21:34+00:00): "track" ?  why?  isn't it service roads?  with service=driveway?  I'll fix them to that.  please do join the local group, and help the community by coordinating your efforts with us.
mariotomo (2020-11-05 16:20:09+00:00): hi.  we have indeed a lot of roads marked as "residential" while not serving as residential.  it would be more helpful if you would move them to "unclassified".  we have a whole discussion about this in our Telegram group, and we have a wiki proposal, but nobody seems interested in contributing to a decision.  please don't add to the mess we already have. ;-)
gileri (2021-01-23 10:32:39+00:00): Reverted : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98013863
Akkurator (2020-11-04 12:42:54+00:00): Hallo Tobias1996,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26479816/history
Du hast hier diesem Zufahrtsweg zum 14-Nothelfer-Parkplatz den Namen "Ravensburger Straße" gegeben.
Heißt der wirklich so?

Und ihn von "service" (Zufahrtsweg) auf "residential" (Anliegerstraße in Siedlungsgebiet) umklassifiziert.
War das tatsächlich beachsichtigt?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2020-11-18 23:31:52+00:00): Da hier keine Antwort kam und eine Inaugenscheinnahme ergab, dass das weiterhin eine Zufahrt ohne Straßennamen  ist, gehe ich von einem Versehen aus und habe o.g. Änderungen rückgängig gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94399968
mariotomo (2020-11-04 22:50:02+00:00): hola Johan goede dag en welkom in Panama. we have a whole discussion which I don't manage to get cleared up, about road classification here.  you want to help?  please be welcome as part of the solution.  we have a Telegram group where we chat about such issues, mostly in Spanish, but English is acceptable.
juminet (2020-11-04 20:39:39+00:00): Hello CHERPI and welcome to OSM. 

If some tracks are private, they can be still present in OSM but we can add an access=private tag on them. 

It is better than deleting them, otherwise they will probably appear again without these access=private tags.

juminet
q_un_go (2020-11-05 11:23:51+00:00): Was die Haltestellennummern angeht:
Das ist das (netterweise mir auf Basis einer OSM-Karte zur Verfügung gestellte) aktuelle Schema der VAG.
HP 11 und 12 auf der Straße will die VAG wohl aufgeben. Südbadenbus will aber 11 nach meinem Kenntnisstand zum Ausstieg benutzen (analog des Ausstiegs bei der Paduaallee) und auch 12 als Einstieg, wenn die Busse nicht an der Messe beginnen. (ich hab das so zumindest vor).
skyper (2020-11-05 12:36:34+00:00): Ok. laut GTFS fährt die VAG bis zum Fahrplanwechsel noch HP 12 an. Ist dort aber HP 1 mit der alten Id "de:08311:30425:0:1".

Meine Frage ist nun ob alle Ids zum neuen Fahrplan angepasst werden oder ob HP 11 und 12 weiterhin eine eigene stop_area mit eigener Id bleibt und das ganze dann eine stop_area_group mit zwei stop_area wird.

Grüße skyper
mariotomo (2020-11-04 22:52:06+00:00): hola. we try to use tertiary for roads leading somewhere relevant, not stuff starting at a settling and ending against a river.  please be welcome to our Telegram group to discuss such issues.
mariotomo (2020-11-04 22:55:12+00:00): highway=service without specifying what service, I'm afraid that's not good practice.
n2m (2020-11-03 22:23:30+00:00): Todo: relations have been broken around the roundabout
aceman444 (2020-11-04 00:40:33+00:00): "X" teda nie je velmi slavny popis sady zmien (pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn ). Okrem toho uvadzajte skutocny zdroj Vasich zmien. Uvadzate Bing a freemap.sk outdoor, pricom na ziadnom z tychto snimkov nemozete vidiet nabozenstvo tej kaplnky ani obchod Fresh, ktory ste premenovali.
gurglypipe (2020-11-05 09:37:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for your detailed edits to WGC on OpenStreetMap :)

Tagging the car park as golf=cartpath is incorrect tagging (it’s a car park, not a cart path) and an example of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer which we try to avoid. While it potentially makes the rendered map look nicer, it makes the underlying map data inconsistent and confusing, and OpenStreetMap data is used in many more contexts than just the static rendered map.

Thanks, and happy editing :)
gurglypipe (2020-11-05 09:38:51+00:00): (I’ve fixed the tagging in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93592748)
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-06 03:14:20+00:00): Whoops, thanks for fixing that
hackthemap (2020-11-26 09:08:07+00:00): Wenn der Name kein besonderer Eigenname dieses Objektes ist, dann wird er nicht in OSM aufgenommen, da dieser leicht aus dem Rest der Tags abgeleitet werden kann und auf diesem Weg auch je nach Karte oder Sprache angepasst werden kann im Gegensatz zu einem festen name Tag.
Um zu spezifizieren, dass es nicht irgendein recycling Platz ist, kannst du den recycling:glass_bottles=yes (Beachte unterschied zu recycling:glass ! ) und andere Tags verwenden. Das kann dann auch maschinell ausgewertet werden.
Für mögliche Keys siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling?uselang=en

Kannst du das eventuell korrigieren, falls das so Sinn macht? :)
Endoplasmatisches Reticulum (2020-11-29 16:58:07+00:00): Hallo hackthemap,

vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe es versucht nach bestem Gewissen zu verbessern. Ich hoffe, dass es nun stimmt. Würde mich über eine Rückmeldung freuen
hackthemap (2020-11-29 19:49:09+00:00): Ja, so passt jetzt alles von den Daten in OSM her, vielen Dank! :)
Am besten beim speichern der Änderungen im Editor noch eine aussagekräftige Nachricht (Changeset Comment / "Commit Message") eingeben, so dass man nachvollziehen kann, was die geplanten Änderungen waren (und warum bei komplexeren Sachen warum diese durchgeführt wurden) um mögliche Fehler schneller zu erkennen. Z.B. ein Changeset mit Kommentar "Remove generic name from recycling; add accepted materials" in dem aber 20 andere Knoten gelöscht wurden, würde so schneller als Fehler auffallen, wenn jemand die anderen 20 Knoten vermisst und nachschaut.
Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ottwiz (2020-11-03 22:37:58+00:00): And also did some road alignments. (AKA tiger cleanup)
aweech (2020-11-04 16:04:20+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

I am confused by your edits here. There are trails visible on aerial imagery and GPS traces, but then you deleted and moved them away. What did you mean by this? Were the trails moved and destroyed in the last few months?
The Pine Tree (2020-11-04 18:34:24+00:00): Thanks for reviewing my changes. Since I made that changeset I realized that the correct action would be to update the attributes on the trails, and not to remove them. Most of the trails are signed private, and some signed no trespassing. The Western most trail extends North beyond the current junction (as seen in traces) a short distance and ends at the town line. This is why it appears pulled away, I disconnected and then extended it. When drawn correctly, this western trail is not private. I see it is easier to delete than to revert a change set, so I haven't figured that out yet. Suggestions on how I should proceed (other than to avoid this in the future)?
aweech (2020-11-04 21:06:41+00:00): Thank you for your response,
It is simple to revert changesets if you use the JOSM editor and the Reverter plugin. The plugin is described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter. There are some powerful features, but the default setup is 3 clicks to do the reversion. Reverting changesets is rude to do to someone else without contacting them first (as I did here), but there's no problem at all with reverting your own changesets.

I'll go ahead and revert those two changesets where you deleted the ways, and then you can add the access tags and move the nodes as you see fit according to your local knowledge. Also, keep in mind the difference between permissive access and private access. Permissive means people can use the paths, but the landowner could close them at any time or ban individuals. Private means anyone who wants to use the paths needs landowner permission, and in New Hampshire there must be No Trespassing signs at the entrance to the path.

Happy mapping!