piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2021-12-26 22:28:57+00:00): Dojazd do węzła - ale wygląda na dojazd dla mieszkańców Żurominka i jego okolic.
voltairovicz (2021-12-27 21:03:27+00:00): Znalazłem przykłady podobnych węzłów, które nie znajdują się bezpośrednio przy drodze danej kategorii, ale de facto ją obsługują. W tym wypadku oddalenie od starej siódemki wynosi ok. kilometra, na tych. Na tych węzłach też takie rozwiązanie zostało zastosowane: https://www.openstreetmap.org#map=15/51.2584/20.9118  ;  https://www.openstreetmap.org#map=16/54.2026/15.9100  ;
https://www.openstreetmap.org#map=15/51.4250/21.0304
Tworzy jakby układ drogowy jaką drogę to obsługuje, w tym wypadku przyszłą wojewódzką, która będzie szła przez Żurominek
Yunkers (2022-11-05 20:37:28+00:00): Hej, skąd brałeś destinations? Bo te Mławie (na całym przebiegu S7, ale tamtych nie dodawałeś) są błędne.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1730558723977489
voltairovicz (2022-11-05 23:11:59+00:00): To po prostu najbliższe miasto powiatowe, nie ma nic błędnego w tym, że było one podane, tak samo nie ma nic błędnego w podaniu Ciechanowa czy Ostrołęki. Tak samo decydenci z GDDKiA różnie ustalają miasta na znakach, czasem nawet jak nie ma to sensu
Yunkers (2022-11-06 07:15:36+00:00): Nie no, było błędne, bo destinations służy do określania kierunków podanych na znakach, a nie "jakichś ogólnie". Myślałem, że krążą jakieś fejkowe dane albo pozmieniali tablice, bo to już druga ekpresówka, w której poprawiam każdy węzeł.
literan (2021-12-24 17:47:58+00:00): это не лунки для гольфа. Не надо мапить под рендер

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
MxxCon (2021-12-24 05:27:46+00:00): Hello.
Please explain the source of the data you are entering. Otherwise, all your edits will reverted as vandalism!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115309934
uf8gob (2021-12-24 11:38:34+00:00): Slow down. This isn't vandalism and you know that. You previously said that I was marking guard shacks and office trailers incorrectly so I fixed them. The buildings are UPS sorting facilities so I tagged them appropriately and included their respective building numbers so as to easily distinguish them just like store numbers for CVS. My source is that I drive trucks for UPS and I have been to all of these buildings, I wasn't sure how to mark that correctly. Please advise as to how best to do that. We all have the same goal here, to make OSM better; kindness will go a long way and will work much better than threats. I hope you feel better and I hope you have a wonderful holiday.
MxxCon (2021-12-24 19:49:25+00:00): I presumed it's vandalism based on your edits, lack of reply to my comment and my cursory search on those warehouse names producing no relevant results. But it's good that you replied here. 🙂👍

Rather than putting warehouse codes into "name" tag, they should probably go into "ref" tag as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
"name" tag would be something like "Carol B. Tomé Depot" or similar. Codes, serial numbers, IDs, etc are more appropriate for "ref" tag.
tux67 (2021-12-24 11:30:28+00:00): Hallo RStock,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Allerdings würde ich in NRW dazu raten die NRW DOPs als Luftbilder zu verwenden statt Bing.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115310204
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
user_5359 (2021-12-25 19:45:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014915205 (and other). What is the meaning of q=yes? Did you want 90° degree angels?
_torsten_ (2021-12-26 10:41:43+00:00): Thanks for the bug report.
:-)
hfs (2022-05-07 21:20:39+00:00): Hi tecmap15,
das Gebäude unter der Wasserrutsche gibt es nicht.

Hier gab es eine Diskussion und Fotos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3153237

Hier habe ich das Gebäude wieder entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120683179

Falls Du es irgendwie anders gemeint hattest, sag Bescheid.

Beste Grüße
hfs
multimodaal (2022-09-19 19:50:57+00:00): Dank nog voor dit herstellen Dick, 
ik zie het nu bij toeval en  snap niet waarom die tag network=rwn in mijn vorige changeset was verwijderd, moet per ongeluk zijn gegaan. Groet!

https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/8417824
Luxus8 (2022-01-08 14:40:40+00:00): Hoi Johan, waarom heb je het stuk Kanaalzichtlaan verwijderd? Dit is een nieuwe weg die er al een tijdje ligt. Zet jij hem terug of zal ik deze changeset reverten? Groeten, Luc
Frame&Focus (2022-01-18 21:22:41+00:00): Looks great! Thanks for contributing to OSM. :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115311134
Richard (2022-04-11 09:52:55+00:00): Hi Mauro, in this changeset you've removed a large section of the EuroVelo 1 route (from Calzadilla de los Barros to Galisteo) - was that intentional?
szjozsef (2022-01-11 09:25:10+00:00): Please also re-route the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3299267 (EN 346 / IR 346) relation to the working track . Please see the error : rail-guided route over non-rail (becase the track is marked under construction) on OSM Inspector: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=25.59914&lat=45.67241&zoom=15&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
eggie (2021-12-23 20:27:21+00:00): Dag Guus,
Je adres heb ik weer  verwijderd en nr 100 even uit dat stapeltje adressen gehaald.
Alles is import vanuit het Kadaster en klopt in de regel echt.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-23 20:47:46+00:00): It is wrong to add the operator at the busstops. 
RET is already in the routerelation.
eggie
eggie (2021-12-23 20:50:45+00:00): I removed operator RET
Geaquinto (2022-01-04 17:49:49+00:00): Esse conjunto de alterações será revertido porque as etiquetas adicionadas são inadequadas. As ruas não são de madeira e não são pontes.
eggie (2021-12-23 20:46:13+00:00): Hi Alex,
Operator RET is wrong at the busstops.
RET is already at the routerelation.
Pleas stop adding the operators to the busstops.
Greetz,
eggie
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:01:18+00:00): Een platform en een stop_position zijn twee verschillende dingen. Het platform moet niet worden vastgemaakt aan de weg.
Dubbele busstops weer verwijderd.
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:04:17+00:00): stop_positions gerepareerd.
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:06:29+00:00): removed operator from station.
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:08:58+00:00): removed operator from stop_position and station.
eggie (2021-12-23 20:52:25+00:00): RET belongs to the relation.. Not the stopposition
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:11:28+00:00): removed operator from railway stops
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:12:45+00:00): removed operator again.
user_5359 (2021-12-25 21:01:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is your understanding of the used keys:

opening_hours =12/7 (we have a "all hours open value, but he is 24/7 not 12/7)
payment:usa=yes (which payment method did you mean? Did you know the difference between the key payment and currency?) 
phone=0025 (this number ist to short for a international number! If you didn't know the fill number, please delete your entry)

If you need help, You are welcome!
user_5359 (2022-01-05 19:50:44+00:00): Google translate the comment:
Ku soo dhawoow OSM! Waa maxay fahamkaaga furayaasha la isticmaalay:

open_hours = 12/7 (waxaan leenahay "saacadaha oo dhan qiimo furan, laakiin isagu waa 24/7 maaha 12/7)
Payment: usa=haa (qaabkee lacag bixineed ayaad uga jeedday? Ma garanaysaa faraqa u dhexeeya lacag bixinta muhiimka ah iyo lacagta?)
phone=0025 (lambarkan waxa uu u soo gaabinayaa nambar caalami ah

Haddii aad u baahan tahay gargaar, Waa lagu soo dhaweynayaa!
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 12:19:56+00:00): Dat de stop_positions beide op dezelfde hoogte staan is onmogelijk.
De kop van de trein stopt ook niet aan het begin van het perron. De stop_position van de Oostelijke lijn dient dus aan het Noordelijke uiteinde van het perron te staan.
luin132 (2021-12-23 20:54:36+00:00): A adjusted a oneway to be bidirectional*
wolfbert (2025-07-10 20:12:32+00:00): Hallo, kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, wo Du die PLZ-Gebiete gefunden hast?
Ich2PunktNull (2025-07-12 11:56:36+00:00): Servus, soweit ich mich erinnern kann hab ich mich hauptsächlich an den an den Gebäuden eingetragenen PLZ orientiert, etwa wenn ganze Ortsteile andere PLZ hatten als der "Hauptort". Teilweise hab ich auch geschaut, was in den Bereichen angesiedelte Betriebe für PLZ verwenden, ob die allerdings immer richtig sind, ist was anderes
wolfbert (2025-07-12 17:46:05+00:00): Ok, danke!
dafadllyn (2023-10-17 17:16:41+00:00): Hi!

I've remarked that you changed many building=* areas from the floor plan to the outline of the roof—sometimes even including awnings. However, the common practice is to map building=* areas at the ground if possible.

Cheers,
Raphael
jmarchon (2023-10-17 18:41:17+00:00): Hello Raphael!

Apologies for my mistake - I should not have included the awnings. Thanks for fixing it.
Regarding the roofs, however, I have been told conflicting things. This subject has been brought up multiple times in various places. Some tell me that roofs should not be included, but others say that the roof should be. Personally, I prefer including the roof.
But since I am no longer as active in the SO area, feel free to change it however you like :-).
Regarding the source tags - I was not aware of those at the time of this changeset, which is why I didn't remove them.

Happy mapping,
jmarchon
dafadllyn (2023-10-18 14:07:54+00:00): Thanks for your reply and please excuse my somewhat harsh reaction on the mailing list. I thought that it was clear that mapping buildings at their ground walls were common practice—and therefore i was a bit annoyed by the fact that you've modified them to include the roofs—but it seems that this is not clear (which i think is a pity). Therefore i will refrain from partially reverting your edit.

Thanks and happy mapping to you too,
Raphael
vakal (2021-12-23 21:31:42+00:00): correction, add buidings and trees, not graves
eggie (2021-12-24 06:44:01+00:00): Dag Xyberion,
Uitzonderingen tweewielers mofa en moped toegevoegd. ... cycleway=opposite (verouderde manier) verwijderd.
MVG
eggue
Leo Slager (2021-12-24 10:51:43+00:00): Met het opknippen van Droogbak werden 15 routerelaties beschadigd.
Met de editor iD leidt het opknippen van wegen dus altijd tot fouten in de routerelaties die over de weg lopen.
Als je wegen wilt opknippen en routerelaties correct wilt bewerken stap dan over naar de editor JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
JJJWegdam (2022-01-12 12:45:22+00:00): Railway platforms are no pedestrian highways. Keeping in mind the issues Leo mentioned, I would be in favor of rolling back this full changeset
KB-01 (2022-01-12 13:29:24+00:00): I suppose you can roll it back if you must, but how would you suggest rail platforms be tagged to reflect their walkability? Would individual access tags perhaps be more appropriate? Or maybe highway=pedestrian as opposed to highway=footway?
Leo Slager (2022-01-12 13:30:07+00:00): Dat levert nu al 23 conficten op.
Die oplossen is een moeizame aangelegenheid.
highway=footway verwijderen lijkt mij veel eenvoudiger.
Leo Slager (2022-01-12 13:59:21+00:00): A railway platform is by definition a walkable area.
No need for tagging.
You only have to connect a stair or a footway to the outline of the platform.
Even the routers can make a route over the outline of the platform.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=52.08956%2C5.10618%3B52.08796%2C5.11013#map=18/52.08828/5.10963
Leo Slager (2022-01-12 14:01:24+00:00): By the way, keep in mind there are no tunnels under a bridge.
see the wiki.
KB-01 (2022-01-12 14:19:55+00:00): I see. For whatever reason, the iD editor doesn’t accept these and other features without “highway” tags (like parking lots and piers) as routable by default. This is something I will keep in mind when making future edits.
Leo Slager (2022-01-12 14:55:06+00:00): The editor iD makes more mistakes.
That is why a lot of experienced mappers use the editor JOSM.
Leo Slager (2022-01-12 15:13:35+00:00): footway and tunnel are removed.
mapperich (2021-12-30 11:04:14+00:00): Achtung: Die von dir eingetragene ID ist die HERIS-ID, für die es noch keinen Tag gibt. Mit ref:at:bda wird die alte Objekt-ID angegeben. Habe es korrigiert. https://www.openstreetmap.at/checker/#bda/49956
DanSpen101 (2021-12-23 21:47:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DanSpen101/traces/4001388
mosstreet (2021-12-23 22:33:35+00:00): When specifying names in Finnish, indicate additionally the name in Russian
name: ru
name: fi
Hugoren Martinako (2021-12-26 14:56:52+00:00): Buenas tardes,

Has de tener cuidado con la edición de rutas de transporte, pues siguen unas reglas muy concretas descritas en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Transporte_p%C3%BAblico (y demás subpáginas) que siguen multitud de aplicaciones de terceros.
En concreto, tu edición había provocado que la línea 4 de metro quedase invalidada para el enrutamiento. Ya ha sido restaurado al estado anterior.

En cualquier caso, gracias por colaborar, si quieres seguir mapeando, empieza por aquí: https://learnosm.org/es/

Saludos
GerdP (2025-04-22 08:17:53+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Bitte mal prüfen: An dieser Stelle https://www.osm.org/node/9362762450
steht ein Gebäude, kein Mast, daneben zwei Masten (auf aktuellen Luftbildern gut zu erkennen).  Keine Ahnung, welchem Zweck die dienen, aber anscheinend nicht communication.
user_5359 (2021-12-25 18:57:12+00:00): Hello! Please check the keys on http://www.osm.org/way/369150632. What is the meaning of the keys 
MultiPolygon
wkt_geom
?
puma515 (2021-12-23 22:56:27+00:00): Danke fürs Fixen.
Das entsteht immer mal wieder beim überarbeiten in bereichen wo die Flächen mit Strassen verklebt sind. Beim Trennen und zerteilen von flächen damit sie mit der Tatsächlichen lage vor ort übereinstimmen entsteht das ab und zu. Das fällt aber meistens erst später auf weswegen ich meine bearbeitungen ein paar Tagen später immer nochmal mit osmose überprüfe und anpasse.

Schön gruß 
puma515
Rainero (2021-12-24 12:53:05+00:00): Kein Ding. Ich wollte nur die PLZ dort fixen, habe mir aber angewöhnt, immer den Validator in JOSM laufen zu lassen, um zu sehen, ob sich was beheben läßt. Das habe ich hier in dem Kartenausschnitt einfach schnell gemacht.  
Schöne Weihnachten und frohes Mappen!
Rainer
PT-53 (2022-01-16 08:07:15+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
in keep right (wurde mal wieder upgedatet) werden in Aulendorf Hinweise "Eisenbahnkreuzung ohne Tag" angezeigt:

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=132100337

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=132100337

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-01-23 11:20:07+00:00): Hallo bigbug21, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
bigbug21 (2022-01-23 13:42:08+00:00): Ja, ist noch im Speicher.
bigbug21 (2022-01-31 20:37:01+00:00): ... ist erledigt.
Cristoffs (2021-12-24 08:54:12+00:00): OSM to nie jest miejsce do zabaw. Dodawanie tego typu informacji będzie oznaczało blokadę konta. Usunąłem wpis.
Thierry1030 (2025-03-08 19:09:35+00:00): Dag Rik007,
Volgens deze note heet dit pad "Kerkwegel"
Kunt u dat bevestigen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4656012
user_5359 (2021-12-25 20:30:59+00:00): Hello! Please use only the key wikipedia (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia). And the key wikipedia:es=content and wikipedia=es:content are duplicates!
user_5359 (2021-12-25 18:04:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your typo addr:quarter instead addr:quater! And please check the position of the nodes.
HandyHat (2021-12-24 02:17:34+00:00): With thanks to https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/TW/
user_5359 (2021-12-25 20:34:57+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. 
CAT=3
Cold=Warm
Label=7029R-04
NAME=No Name
OBJECTID=3312
OBJECTID_1=3312
RivMiles=0.01261746
SHAPE_Length=0.00019814462547294441
SRPW=0
Strm_Ordr=1
WBID=RI0007029R-04
WQS=A
ZestyEel (2021-12-25 21:21:50+00:00): Hello! Apologies, they're from RIGIS. I meant to go back and fix them but they slipped my mind. Thanks for reminding me!
tastrax (2021-12-30 11:38:42+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
rbala (2021-12-30 21:21:52+00:00): Thank you for pointing out the guidelines.
user_5359 (2021-12-25 19:43:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964993268. Did you mean maxspeed instead of q?
user_5359 (2021-12-25 18:43:17+00:00): Hello! Please check my correction of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9065941824: Did you mean name instead "Nom de la structure de santé dans le fichier OsmAnd"?
HandyHat (2021-12-24 02:17:10+00:00): With thanks to https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/TW/
user_5359 (2021-12-25 17:19:10+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 20:27:54+00:00): Hi 489df4he,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9363014521

the diet: tag is to be used only for diets, eating japanese is not a diet, I'm putting that value under the cuisine tag
489df4he (2021-12-28 07:41:46+00:00): Hi  ivanbranco,
You're right. Thanks.
hdevine825 (2022-04-12 20:16:54+00:00): I noticed in this changeset that you edited the crossing=traffic_signals tag to crossing=marked Is that the more appropriate tagging if the crossing is at a traffic light controlled intersection?
MxxCon (2022-04-12 21:44:57+00:00): No. This edit was wrong. Wiki and iD didn't have clear differentiation between these values so there are a lot of intersections that were previously incorrectly tagged as "marked" instead of "traffic_signals".  I'll edit to fix this one.
user_5359 (2021-12-27 11:02:31+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9363069640. Did you mean the key ref instead of key no (short for number also known as opposite of yes)?
user_5359 (2021-12-27 11:02:51+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9363087809. Did you mean the key ref instead of key no (short for number also known as opposite of yes)?
Barnabas Charles Daudi (2022-06-12 16:49:40+00:00): Nice place
AkuAnakTimur (2021-12-24 09:29:03+00:00): Hi, many thanks for the effort to add street names in Malaysia. Tali Air in English is "Canal"
AkuAnakTimur (2021-12-24 09:31:06+00:00): Parit may be a "Ditch"
syeda_taj (2021-12-27 08:43:20+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the headsup. I have noted and removed the name on track
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 23:01:38+00:00): When you update this parking area, why don't you disconected the parking area and the highway?
dmanddee (2021-12-28 12:51:07+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 
Thanks for highlighting this error. I have now disconnected the Parking feature with all the roads nearby as a part of changeset (115469431). I am new to editing community and I will take this as a learning from you. 
Best Regards,
dmanddee.
TurntSnacko (2021-12-24 06:43:53+00:00): Not all applicable by the way - there are exceptions within Minneapolis based off of how the street name is written in house addresses (as according to https://gis.hennepin.us/property/map/default.aspx) So far only four exceptions found, West & East Lake of the Isles Parkway and North & South Wayzata Boulevard
dru1138 (2021-12-26 15:53:06+00:00): Hi there
It looks like you broke the coastline of several of the isles. I'm a little confused what you did wrong, as your coastline ways seem complete, but they have disappeared from the renderer.
user_177389 (2021-12-26 19:27:59+00:00): Hello,

the coastline tag was removed from the way elements (and pointless: attached to the relations). I brought it back. But now it will take a while for it to render properly again.

Best regards
Mario
blackboxlogic (2022-01-01 22:50:18+00:00): Consider adding a comment on change 115313868 explaining why tmerc58 shouldn't do this again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115322509
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 23:03:49+00:00): Hey, deine Changesetkommentare sind so nichtssagend. 
Mit "Ergänzungen" kann leider niemand etwas anfangen. Ich würde da adhoc auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments verweisen.

Gleichzeitig möchte ich hier besonders darauf hinweisen, da hier nicht einmal etwas ergänzt wurde, sondern gelöscht!
martinst (2021-12-28 22:07:00+00:00): Hi, shouldn't these numbers not better be tagged using ref=* ?
Horza (2022-02-02 16:11:28+00:00): What's your source for this being Peoples Gas System?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014994336

The sign on that little fenced-in area says JEA and the parcel is also owned by JEA
Horza (2022-02-02 16:12:29+00:00): Also, there's a little section of pipeline visible crossing a stream here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027069107

Do you think it's the same pipeline as this one you mapped?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014994337

Thanks
zluuzki (2022-02-03 17:44:52+00:00): https://pvnpms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/
Public domain data, select State >Florida and County >Duval
My guess is that JEA owns the lines, and Peoples Gas System pays JEA to use the lines.
zluuzki (2022-02-03 17:49:13+00:00): To comment 2: Possibly. However, it could also be a sewage pipe. I don't know.
ygcgjp5 (2022-01-10 14:06:32+00:00): Truputį nepataikei, lidlas stovi į kairę 300 metrų :-)
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-10 20:34:54+00:00): Čia apie Raudondvario pl. 169B? Aš tik kažkurias žymas tvarkiau, Lidl nebraižiau. O aip turi būti? Pataisykime! :-)
ygcgjp5 (2022-01-10 20:58:32+00:00): Ai jo, nebūtai apkaltinau. Ištrynsiu viską ten ko nereik
skyper (2022-01-25 01:32:38+00:00): Hallo  Nastia

Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74522

Bitte alle gemachten Änderungen auch in den anderen CS erneut überprüfen.

Wie und wann würde dieser CS überprüft? Warum fällt das nicht den anleitenden Personen auf?

Nebenbei vermisse ich auch Deinen Namen unter der Liste im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapbox#Mapbox_Data_Team

Bitte geb Bescheid, wenn die nötigen Überprüfungen und Änderungen erfolgt sind.

Danke und Grüße
skyper

#REVIEWED_BAD
eggie (2021-12-24 08:27:13+00:00): Dag localhost..
Lijkt me oke.. Up to the local mapper!
Gr eggie
localhost (2021-12-24 08:43:32+00:00): Top, nu niet teveel weggeknipt.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-21 15:46:59+00:00): سلام
محدوده ساختمانی استخر ایثار را به خوبی ثبت کرده اید. چند خط تکراری روی هم بود که اصلاح گردید. و استخر هم جزئی از ساختمان قرار داده شد.
eggie (2021-12-24 08:29:27+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me een logische aanpassing.
Gr eggie
localhost (2021-12-24 08:44:01+00:00): Feedback gevraagd omdat ik het fietspad moest opknippen. Wist niet of dat goed was gegaan.