piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Warin61 (2021-09-25 07:12:55+00:00): Hi,

Building parts do not require a multipolygon relation. In fact the relation generates errors. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18157&lat=-9.43986&zoom=18

Please cease adding relations to building:past - it is not required.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-09-12 12:14:17+00:00): Hi asj,

why are you not merging the other lake parts like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982135410/history ?
PT-53 (2021-09-12 06:39:03+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
ist die Übernahme der Straßennamen von unser-stadtplan.de nach OSM legal ? Hast Du das geprüft ?

Lies das mal durch:
https://www.unser-stadtplan.de/de/html/hinweise

Fragende Grüße
ChrisFromRV (2021-09-12 09:48:26+00:00): Hi. Mmhh, gute Frage, bin leider kein Anwalt. Allerdings kann ich mir auch nicht vorstellen, das der Betreiber sich das ganze Openstreetmap durchsieht, beim nächsten Mal lasse ich einfach den Kommentar von wem ich das habe, einfach weg, ok?
DD1GJ (2021-09-13 09:30:10+00:00): Nein,  schau  bitte selbst vor Ort nach! 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_Street
PT-53 (2021-09-13 12:12:03+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV, 

hast Du Dir mal den o.g. Link angeschaut. Da steht u.a.:

>>>>
Unsere eigenen Inhalte:
Die von uns stammenden bzw. in unserem Auftrag erstellten urheberrechtlich geschützten Teile unserer Webseite und der eingestellten Inhalte, z.B. Stadtpläne, Karten, dürfen nur mit unserer Einwilligung oder im gesetzlich zulässigen Rahmen, der insbesondere durch das Urheberrechtsgesetz definiert wird, genutzt werden. 
<<<<<

Ich habe Deine Einträge daher vorsorglich wieder gelöscht.

Und nein, es wäre gar keine gute Idee künftig einfach die Quellen-Angaben wegzulassen. Du willst doch dem OSM-Objekt nicht durch illegale Daten-Quellen vorsätzlich Schaden  zu fügen.
Sollte ich feststellen, daß Du keine glaubhaften Quellen für Deine Eingaben angibst, müßte ich eine Sperre für Dich beantragen.
Das willst Du doch nicht, oder ?

Grüße
Frans S (2021-09-13 09:01:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please do not include the shadow into your mapping and be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111081180
Frans S (2021-09-12 09:07:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be sure the traces you recognize as buildings are buildings.  Clear rooflines, shadow next to a building that proofs it is above groundlevel.
Paths leading to it,  Yard with different ground color which indicate human activity.


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111081756
Frans S (2021-09-12 09:02:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111081918
clairedelune (2021-09-23 09:59:51+00:00): Bonjour Olyon,
Pourriez-vous svp indiquer la raison de la suppression d'au moins 14 aires de santé à travers le pays svp ? Plusieurs contributeurs sont actuellement en train de vérifier la qualité et de corriger les membres des relations cassées, leur suppression est donc vivement découragée. Ce changeset est tellement gros qu'il est difficile de percevoir l'étendue des modifications opérées.
Olyon (2021-09-23 15:07:05+00:00): Bonjour Clairedelune,
Je n'ai pas supprimé de relations cassées, je l'ai ai corrigé lorsque j'ai pu.
Les relations supprimés était des relations en double. Même health_level et même membres que d'autres relations, parfois la seule différence était le name tout en majuscule.
Par exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13036659/history était un double de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13036212
autre exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13036387/history était un double de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13031325

Dans JOSM, lorsque l'on coupe un way il faut être sûr d'avoir télécharger les relations qui utilisent ce way pour que JOSM ajoute le nouveau way créé à ces relations. Je pense que c'est la raison principale aux dizaines de relations que j'ai corrigé. Je suis tombé sur ces relations cassées car la relation du pays avait été cassé sûrement de cette façon.

Je n'ai pas tout corrigé, certaines relations avait de trop gros problèmes et d'autres ont été cassées depuis. Voila une liste d'id de relations cassées :
11245592
11245593
12557876
12562374
12562581
12563117
12570388
12608731
12615319
12615354
12619789
12619844
12619877
12619972
12620327
12621827
12623865
12653445
12658938
12662181
12662437
12665829
12667879
12670116
12670152
12670415
12678475
12687321
12687685
12714429
13169661
13192650
13234000
13236567
clairedelune (2021-09-23 19:33:18+00:00): Bonjour Olyon,
Merci beaucoup pour la clarification sur les relations dupliquées et pour les contributions. Nous allons poursuivre les corrections sur les autres relations, en utilisant aussi cette liste.
Frans S (2021-09-12 07:58:42+00:00): hello. You asked me to review your work.
This is a rather complex part with buildings close to each other. Not the easiest task for a beginner mapper.
Some facts:
From the 561 buildings you mapped are 29 not squared. (surprises me because in JOSM it is so easy to map good squared buildings with the building tool)
Lots of buildings have a complex shape where you just mapped a rectangular shape.  You know how to add an extention to a building?
You work in JOSM. Which tools do you use?   
Are you familiar with this course?
https://learnosm.org/en/josm/
I also copied the link to a Missing maps document how to validate. It is also a good guide how to use the tools in JOSM to achieve a good result while mapping.
https://www.missingmaps.org/assets/downloads/Validating_Data_EN.pdf
Best regards
jmilot (2022-04-07 18:00:15+00:00): > changed ferry terminal access from customers->permit to fix the AC Transit Trip Planner,

Please, don't do that. The `permit` access tag doesn't describe correctly the true access to those ways. This 1) breaks the purpose of OpenStreetMap of being an independent platform and 2) actually breaks other third party software that actually respect the OSM specs.
oba510 (2022-04-07 21:30:56+00:00): Hi jmilot,

This was discussed briefly here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#Access_only_for_ticketed_passengers.3F and here: https://old.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/pg4mxq/need_help_fixing_san_francisco_map/

access=customers has all of the same problems as access=permit in this situation.  Any software that respects the access=customers tag will have issues routing across areas tagged with access=customers if the origin or destination is not nearby or linked in some way.  This edit was not specifically for OpenTripPlanner - the access tagging was causing problems in every router I tried.

I personally don't feel like either customers or permit accurately reflects the real-world situation here and would rather just remove them (leaving bicycle=dismount) but didn't want to step on any toes.  

In reality the access depends a lot on the day-to-day operations of the individual ferry operators; usually the gates are unlocked, sometimes they're only opened close to boarding; sometimes there are people checking tickets/clipper cards at the entrance, or only when passengers off-board, or not at all.  Sometimes people line up on the dock itself long before boarding.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-12 06:27:05+00:00): Hi Lucanos,

waterway=dam is typically used to signify dam structures as opposed to actual water (unintuitive in the Australian vernacular, I know). This is why it renders as dark grey on the standard OSM basemap.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam

For most farm ponds or similar features, natural=water and water=* (water=pond, water=reservoir, etc) is generally the correct way to tag them.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater
lucanos (2021-09-12 10:39:47+00:00): Appreciate the feedback WoodWoseWulf.

I'll bear that in mind moving forward.
neo-plan (2021-09-12 05:22:47+00:00): https://ibb.co/Pz8mQWt
owiecc (2021-09-12 08:27:29+00:00): Thanks for the fixes. My default SDFE map does not show these changes yet. Is there a newer imagery available that I don't know about?
osmviborg (2021-09-12 09:51:38+00:00): Not released yet. Is off-centered in several places. https://listservices.kortforsyningen.dk/#/map/WMS/orto_foraar_temp
felipeeugenio (2021-09-12 14:17:22+00:00): Hola Kristine.
Los colores son en inglés. Black en este caso. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour)
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111083523
Kristine France (2021-09-12 18:06:04+00:00): Hola Felipe!
Gracias por lo de aclaraciones sobre el color, no lo sabía.
Respecto a tu comentario anterior, te quería contar que no entiendo nada de programación, informática ni tags, nada. Lo siento. Te comento esto porque algunas cosas que me dices no las entiendo bien. Incluso lo del chat general trato de acceder con el link que me diste y me sale que no tengo telegram y ni siquiera sé lo que es. Supongo que es un programa de chat, pero no estoy segura de instalarlo.

Aprecio mucho tu ayuda en la medida que te puedo entender qué hacer y qué no. 
Sin embargo el proyecto son SÓLO los cruces. Tengo como 10 personas a cargo en Valparaíso y cerca de 20 en Providencia y ya coordinarlos es difícil. Con suerte saben entrar en la plataforma y hacer líneas, pero confío que ya aprenderán. Para agregar dificultad, las cámaras o fotos no están habilitadas y no sé por qué. La Universidad y Microsoft están viendo esto, pero mapear con Google streetmap es más difícil aún. 
Este proyecto tiene un transfondo comunitario y de inclusión, relacionado con Smart City, para que me entiendas que esto tiene detrás transmitir conocimientos y vincular las comunidades ciudadanas aunque no sepan.
Este mismo proyecto lo están haciendo en Quito, Sao Paulo y Los Angeles. 
Los sectores de las dos ciudades en Chile lo priorizaron las municipalidades con ayuda de SEREMI y MINVU

Después, en otra etapa, haremos las veredas conectando los cruces con las veredas. Si nos ayudas ahora y/o después, feliz! Pero no podemos mezclar los proyectos. 

Por último, te referías a unas rejas... son la línea de bolardos que puse? 
Efectivamente no dejan el cruce en silla de ruedas...

Muchas gracias por tu orientaciones y espero entender en la medida que voy aprendiendo. Sabiendo que hay cosas que la gente a cargo no podrá hacer.
Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2021-09-12 20:55:12+00:00): Hola Kristine, estoy hablando con Ignacio Norambuena.
Telegram es una app muy similar a whatsapp. bájala y puedes entrar al chat.
No tengas ninguna verguenza en preguntar algo. hay cerca de 200 personas en el chat y se hacen preguntas basicas todo el tiempo.

saludos y nos vemos
Kristine France (2021-09-12 21:28:57+00:00): gracias, lo intentaré!
Jany48 (2021-09-12 08:26:01+00:00): Ahoj, dávaj pozor pri úprave plôch landuse, lebo tu sa to znova nejako rozbilo tak, ako aj v okolí Šarišských Michalian. Tam, kde bol farmland západne od Veľkého Šariša, je teraz diera. V prípade Šarišských Michalian to bola zmena 3 multipolygónov z farmland na meadow, čo som už opravil do pôvodného stavu.
Zaneo (2021-10-08 04:40:00+00:00): Why were these deleted?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-08 05:23:11+00:00): In general it is better to retag such objects, rather than to delete
FrankOverman (2021-09-12 06:40:55+00:00): Screenshots van de opnames: https://photos.app.goo.gl/nFfnbSQBexcjbkCX7
Warin61 (2021-09-13 08:54:31+00:00): Hi,
This removed some boundaries from the Kosi NP. Note: the tree areas should be removed from the park boundaries... unless they really are aligned. Do not move the tree boundary when it is also used for other things.. make a new way for the tree edge and divorce it from the other things.
Warin61 (2021-09-13 09:00:58+00:00): You have overlapping tree areas! And the relations for them ... one is broken.
Relations 
Relation: 13196716 - ok
Relation: 13196716 - broken
Relation: 11798320 - ok
breno-au (2021-09-23 12:30:44+00:00): Thank you for reviewing my changeset. The overlapping natural=wood has been resolved.
Arlo James Barnes (2021-09-16 19:53:03+00:00): thanks, that typo consistently haunts my spelling.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-21 01:13:43+00:00): Hello, you have left a gap in the Chandler boundary, are you able to fix it?
marczoutendijk (2021-12-22 16:04:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9083513103
Why did you add amenity=Fahrradgeschäft while shop=bicycle already says it all?
It's a bit redundant.
Or is it also:
amenity=bicycle_rental?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
APneunzehn74 (2021-12-22 20:35:48+00:00): Hello I can no longer understand why I added an "amenity" back then.  Got it removed now.  Thanks for the hint.  Greetings Andreas
user_8722718 (2021-10-12 20:54:34+00:00): Ciao, cos'è successo? Non si passa più, neanche attorno?
mueschel (2021-09-13 10:00:10+00:00): Hi,
these nodes got many uncommon tags that are not used in other places, could you check that?
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.
compdude (2021-10-04 06:59:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I saw you changed this road to highway=service; however this road is not right for this tag. It is intended for roads in parking lots, driveways, etc. See the wiki for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service?uselang=en
RoadAvaits (2021-10-04 19:25:16+00:00): Well, what would be the right classification for a forest service road then?
RoadAvaits (2021-10-04 19:30:35+00:00): The road leads to quite a few campsites and trailheads, so the "service" sounds quite right to me:

"For access roads to, or within an industrial estate, camp site, business park, car park, alleys, etc. "
compdude (2021-10-04 19:38:21+00:00): Usually unclassified or track is the correct tag for a forest service road, with track being for roads only used for logging out that are no longer maintained. A service road is basically analogous to a driveway and is not on a public right of way.
compdude (2021-10-04 19:41:03+00:00): I'd also suggest you look at the examples on the wiki page to get a better idea of what roads should be tagged as highway= service.
RoadAvaits (2021-10-04 19:58:56+00:00): The wiki is quite confusing for a newbie, although it the right way to get familiar with all the details.

I feel quite confused about "track" being primarily used for logging operations, while the road leads to some remote vistas or nature areas and is requires high clearance off-road/4x4.jeep vehicles.
compdude (2021-10-04 20:07:23+00:00): I must admit that even though I've been on OSM for over ten years, I don't fully understand the highway=track tag. So don't expect to have a full, thorough understanding of the highway tags right away.
RoadAvaits (2021-10-04 20:12:40+00:00): Thanks!
compdude (2021-10-04 15:55:50+00:00): Hello, I noticed you tagged this as highway=road. However that tag is only to be used when the road type is not known; that was not the case here. I have changed it back to highway=unclassified.
Frans S (2021-09-12 08:57:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
See my previous comments.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111086117
Frans S (2021-09-12 08:56:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Squaring Buildings. Shadow of the building included. Yard mapped as building. Accurate mapping

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111086365
JhowieNitnek (2021-09-24 16:55:17+00:00): Why did you add the name of the streets to buildings?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-12 08:52:32+00:00): This changeset removes

population:note=中国地级行政区正确渲染需要填写40万以上人口。真实人口数据请使用china_population。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-12 08:53:02+00:00): This changeset removes

population:note=县级行政区不要填population，因其渲染会与地级行政区混淆。人口数据请使用china_population标签。
maraf24 (2021-09-14 15:33:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982177274
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 15:38:38+00:00): nie skończyłeś
maraf24 (2021-09-14 17:36:38+00:00): Bo to analogicznie jak poprzednie.
Lokale na parterze, mieszkania wyżej.
literan (2021-09-13 18:42:32+00:00): а почему такой узкий мост? он же раз в пять шире по снимку.
Исправлю
Linda89 (2021-09-16 11:55:28+00:00): sorry, 
ширину делал по-смыслу, а не базируясь на реальном размере. Мост доавил только для того, чтоб включить на наго нанесенный кем-то забор.
Спасибо
Frans S (2021-09-12 09:51:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be sure the traces are buildings.  Here are a number of traces mapped as building, but no proof on the ground. (Shadow, rooflines etc)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111087164
Kovoschiz (2021-09-12 11:08:15+00:00): `=terrace` means an entire block of `=house`. Use eg `building=apartments` + `apartments=terraced`.
Kovoschiz (2021-09-12 11:08:54+00:00): Or `=house` + `house=terraced` + `building:use=apartments`