piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2016-01-15 17:39:27+00:00): Om de openingsuren toe te voegen, check de syntax hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Het is een beetje ingewikkeld, maar wel doenbaar.
BJ_CT (2016-01-18 09:57:03+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast, bedankt.
chris2map (2016-01-30 18:57:44+00:00): Something went wrong here!
The house is totally distorted.
bhavani1 (2019-03-07 04:06:48+00:00): "Hi Serpico,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 391541484 and all the surrounding ways are classified as 'Track'.However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,the area seems to be navigable.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Serpico (2019-03-07 14:24:28+00:00): Hi bhavani1,
Thanks for your message.
I can't speak specifically about 391541484 as it was armchair mapping before
 or after going there, however everything South of 390789851 were tracks then.
To give you an idea, I was riding an hardtail mtb at the time, 391541484 must have been asphalted at some point but was
in such bad shape than I couldn't do more than 10 km/h.
way 391541505 was track, recently changed by naik4 to residential, I was better off
dismount and push the bike due the shape/condition of the track.
It's been a few years but I doubt it has changed much, there are hundred if not
thousands of kilometers of tracks like this Bogor Regency
 alone ( almost exclusively used by locals ) so you can imagine the cost of asphalting them all.
I just had a look at the DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery in JOSM it looks like it hasn't changed much,
391541495 on this bridge 2 motorcycles couldn't cross at the same time...
user_5359 (2016-01-15 17:51:15+00:00): Kollege wurde über die Probleme seines Updates informiert.
luiswoo (2016-01-15 14:43:20+00:00): Maturi0n, зачем вести землепользование по дорогам?
Это нужно делать либо так:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/47.23135/39.75174
Либо так:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93689347#map=15/47.2638/39.7330
Кадастровая карта http://maps.rosreestr.ru/PortalOnline/
WMS-сервер для JOSM: 'http://maps.rosreestr.ru/arcgis/services/Cadastre/CadastreWMS/MapServer/WMSServer?'
Stereo (2016-01-15 12:59:30+00:00): Hmm, but that's tagging for the renderer if the grass isn't actually hovering in the air.
SHARCRASH (2016-01-15 14:15:02+00:00): Yeah i know, my edit was a test for a "substitute" at one of OSM's flaws. Obviously you don't get what's at stake. If you don't know, sorry, OSM comments don't allow enough characters for a full explanation. I explained the most important in my changeset comment.
SomeoneElse (2016-01-15 14:19:16+00:00): @SHARCRASH I agree, it can be frustrating that OSM changeset comments don't allow more than 255 characters.  However, you've always got the option (as soon as the changeset is closed) of adding a changeset discussion comment that extends it - you can explain all you like in there.
Cheers,
Andy
SHARCRASH (2016-01-15 21:28:30+00:00): @SomeoneElse Good idea! I will think about it for the next time. Thanks! But it's really long to explain. Stereo knows me well for the loooong communications i can write.
Sanderd17 (2016-01-21 17:46:49+00:00): This data contains a huge amount of duplicated nodes. I also can't find any documentation on this import. Is this discussed somewhere?
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 15:28:23+00:00): Could you please join the discussion about the import on the wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import
maraf24 (2016-01-15 23:53:52+00:00): Dodałeś Lidla już wczoraj.
maraf24 (2016-01-15 23:54:53+00:00): Co gorsza, Lidl jest tutaj na mapie od 3 lat, więc nie wiem po co 2 kolejne.
maraf24 (2016-01-15 23:55:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175889346
maraf24 (2016-01-15 23:57:07+00:00): Biedronka też już była.
maraf24 (2016-01-16 00:00:38+00:00): Kościół już był...
Peda (2016-03-23 00:17:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38010440 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import - please adhere to the import guidelines and do only use sources permitted to use
SOGEFI (2016-01-22 16:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36742913 where the changeset comment is: Revert pour cause de données inexactes
literan (2016-01-15 13:47:49+00:00): ну почему monument-то??? Это что, "Родина-мать" или мемориал на поклонной горе? Это tourism=attraction. Я поправлю.
literan (2016-01-15 13:48:36+00:00): Причем "name=Один из сохранившихся флигелей" это не name, а description.
maraf24 (2016-01-16 00:15:02+00:00): Targowisko już było...
literan (2016-01-15 13:59:40+00:00): ох, что же вы там понаделали, на круговом... по две дороги в одном и том же месте... Поправил все. Получается, с ул. Новоселов, если едешь на юго-восток, на круг выехать нельзя?
mueschel (2016-01-15 22:00:29+00:00): Hi Chriss,
why did you revert this correction of an obviously misspelled key? The discussion in the changeset about telephone-keys did not relate to changes like this one.
Jan
ChrissW-R1 (2016-01-15 22:10:05+00:00): Hi Jan,

the origin changeset was an automatically process as well. So I'm on my way to revert all of my changes like this.

Chriss
mueschel (2016-01-16 18:51:51+00:00): What exactly do you call "automatic process"? You found the key in Taginfo and loaded the ways in JOSM? If you have a look at each object, scan its tags for validity, make sure the retagging does not destroy information and makes sense - then everything is fine and you helped OSM to have a more consistent tagging. 
To me this changeset was completely valid as is.
ChrissW-R1 (2016-01-18 16:34:10+00:00): I found the key in Taginfo, loaded it via Overpass API to JOSM, use the search functions to select all features with the key and finally I changed the key to the "correct" one.
I have no look on each feature or check every tagging on them.
maraf24 (2016-01-16 00:18:42+00:00): Boisko już było, i to lepiej oznaczone.
Polo Market też już był.
geow (2016-01-16 10:38:22+00:00): Hallo SJ_83, dieser umfangreiche Import erscheint nach erster Durchsicht in mehrfacher Hinsicht nicht den im Wiki vereinbarten Regeln zu entsprechen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Keine vorherige Diskussion, keine Dokumentation, fehlende Quellen- und Lizenzangaben, handwerklich mangelhaft (schiefe Gebäude, falsche oder fehlende Tags usw.)

Kannst du dazu Stellung nehmen?
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-16 12:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36612410 where the changeset comment is: Undiskutierten und mangelhaft ausgeführten Import entfernt. Bitte die Regeln für Datenimporte beachten
Peda (2016-03-23 00:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38010440 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import - please adhere to the import guidelines and do only use sources permitted to use
maraf24 (2016-01-16 00:22:54+00:00): Duplikat boiska i Biedronki.
GerdP (2016-01-16 06:43:48+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a way with highway="Walk Way".
The first part of that way looks like a road that allows cars, so it should be called 
highway=residential
The rest is probably highway=path.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Hope that helps ?
naoliv (2016-01-15 15:09:39+00:00): André, names should always be in the local languange (Portuguese, in this case).
André Abadesso (2016-01-15 15:32:31+00:00): Will correct it
Dr GIS (2016-01-15 14:01:03+00:00): Used Sentinel 2A Image 02.01.2016 for visual validation of track presence and historical processed Landsat imagery to detect long-term forest disturbance.
user_5359 (2016-01-15 18:20:39+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn das noch eine genutzte Kirche ist, dann bitte auch mit amenity=palce_of_worship ergänzen.
Basstoelpel (2017-02-24 19:53:51+00:00): Hi Tapan,

building=yes gehört nur an die Fläche eines Gebäudes. An einen Punkt mit der Adresse gehört es nicht. 

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Volker Fröhlich (2020-05-31 19:41:43+00:00): Hallo, auf der Hütte ist ein Schild, auf dem steht: "Vereinshütte 'Seemoos', 622m". Wäre das als Name vielleicht besser geeignet und sollte ele angepasst werden?

Schöne Grüße,

Volker
wandergeier (2020-05-31 21:23:11+00:00): Hallo Volker,
Danke der Rückfrage vor Abänderung. Wie aus der Chronik ersichtlich, ist es bereits vier Jahre her, dass ich vor Ort war. Woher ich die genaue Höhe habe, weiß ich nicht mehr. Jedoch ist zwischen 621 und 622m nicht so viel um, wir können den Tag ele gerne anpassen, damit er mit dem Schild übereinstimmt.
Den Namen habe ich so gewählt, damit in den OSM-Standard-Renderings sofort ersichtlich ist, um welchen Verein es sich handelt. In den operator-Tag habe ich dann "Ortsgruppe Ampflwang" gesetzt.
Natürlich könnte man den Name-Tag als Eigenname für das Gebäude dem am Schild ersichtlichen anpassen. Der operator-Tag müsste dann ebenfalls auf "Naturfreunde Ampflwang" bzw. "NF - Sektion Ampflwang" geändert werden.
Wenn du willst, kannst du das gerne machen.
LG
simon04 (2017-01-05 18:28:12+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/575058
> Das tagging der meisten Lifte bei Bahnhöfen stimmt nicht mit der Wiki überein
Weltstaat (2017-01-05 19:23:59+00:00): ja richtig, das Schema hat sich geändert, seitdem ich hier editiert hab. Ich werds ausbessern!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
lakedistrict (2016-01-15 15:44:02+00:00): #OSMschools
*Martin* (2016-01-18 07:13:50+00:00): Ahoj Stefan. Prosim pridavaj "Krátky popis ukladaných zmien" vzdy ked ukladas zmeny. Dakujem.
stefan197001 (2016-01-18 08:48:13+00:00): Ahoj. Niečo ako označenie verejných budov, obchodov-dobre som pochopil? Štefan
*Martin* (2016-01-18 08:59:17+00:00): ano, plus este ze kde. napr. "Niečo ako označenie verejných budov, obchodov, Valaliky".

dalsia vec, do poľa Názov patria iba vlastné mená, nie všeobecné. Preto prosím odstráň názvy ako "Futbalové ihrisko", "OcÚ Valaliky", "Novinový stánok", "Potravint" a pod. Dakujem.
JCR65 (2016-01-15 16:32:38+00:00): Bijna goed, het pand met Koetshuis Anneville moet 101 zijn.

Jan de Constant Rebecque
Supaplex (2016-01-16 04:52:03+00:00): 好像重覆加了
Supaplex (2016-01-16 04:54:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36608440
可以看一下，如果是一家店兩個門牌號碼，可以用分號方式加兩個地門牌號碼
mueschel (2016-01-16 13:16:15+00:00): Hi Nadeem, 
could you explain this import of 908 ways, which all lie on top of existing roads and do not carry any standard OSM tag? 
Jan
redriverit (2016-01-17 20:22:14+00:00): Jan,

This is a major update of all streets for Red River Parish, LA in order to comply with official Street Naming/Addressing scheme. This data is from the Red River Parish Communications District and all changes are appropriate. We continue to make updates and corrections of this data.
Thanks!
mueschel (2016-01-17 20:38:09+00:00): Has this import been described in the wiki or announced on the mailing list? 
I don't think "data correction"  as changeset comment is appropriate here. Also "source=survey" is definitely wrong.
redriverit (2016-01-18 15:06:54+00:00): Yes this has been announced on the mailing list. All new data is uploaded and is now correct compared to the old tiger road files which were completely inaccurate. I am the GIS manager for the Parish (County) and this data is official with correct address range tags. We are continuing to improve this data as we want people to have access to correct data and OSM is a great tool for this!
Thanks!
Commodoortje (2016-01-16 10:48:14+00:00): Ik heb uw aangebrachte node samengevoegd met de adresnode, en enkele tags toegevoegd. Nu kun je het ook op osm.org zien.
mueschel (2016-01-17 13:08:58+00:00): Hi coenie,
First of all, if nobody else said it before: Welcome to OSM!

on some buildings I found the tag " building:levels\=2 = commercial" which should be written differently:
  building:levels = 2
  building = commercial
I just fixed that for you. 

Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan
vramirez122000 (2016-01-19 14:36:16+00:00): ¡Welcome Back!
yeskela (2016-01-16 10:13:22+00:00): Привет. Линию нарисовал - отлично! Хоть один тег на неё добавишь - вообще цены не будет) А то никто никогда её не увидит. Почти никто)
nik797 (2016-01-16 15:17:36+00:00): Платная стоянка.
yeskela (2016-01-18 06:33:42+00:00): В openstreetmap кроме того, что ты нарисовал линии, нужно пометить, что это. Чтобы все (включая систему отрисовки карт) знали, что с этим дальше делать. Для этого на объекты назначаются теги. Для парковки можно почитать тут http://goo.gl/IS49Eu.
Т.е. тебе надо на созданную линию добавить 
amenity=parking
fee=yes
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:16:53+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391630827 - is it roundabout?
naoliv (2016-01-15 20:20:18+00:00): Carlos, procure, na medida do possível, reaproveitar os objetos já existentes.
Ao invés de apagar alguma coisa para fazer novamente, tente corrigir.
Também é bastante importante colocar uma descrição correta em suas edições.
"gg" não ajuda os outros mapeadores a entender o que você fez.
maraf24 (2016-01-23 12:12:48+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że używasz highway=services w miejscach, gdzie powinno być landuse=industrial.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices
Adam_Piszczek (2016-01-23 15:35:52+00:00): ale tu nie ma obszaru przemysłowego
maraf24 (2016-01-23 15:38:43+00:00): Na pewno nie ma miejsca obsługi podróżnych.
industrial,commerical,retail-w zasadzie z tego trzeba wybierać.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-01-23 16:35:23+00:00): ok,widze że poprawiłeś ,tam się znajdują hale magazynowe do wynajęcia ale chyba część z nich  jest już zajęta.
maraf24 (2016-01-23 16:37:48+00:00): Do magazynów pasowałoby commercial.
W całej Polsce poprawiłem, bo były tak oznaczone np. usługi krawieckie albo delikatesy.
Tłumaczenie w iD też poprawiłem, ale jeszcze nie jest wdrożone.
marc__marc (2021-04-01 12:00:10+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3948713005
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ?
le nom d'un magasin ? d'une entreprise ? la pièce de stockage qu'on peux visiter ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Hjart (2016-01-15 20:48:17+00:00): Uh, hvad har du dog gjort ved Tarpvej? Tror du ikke det er bedst at revertere?
LarsBG (2016-01-15 23:55:27+00:00): Jo det ser ikke godt ud :-) Burde nu være i orden.
BeKri (2016-02-05 22:44:54+00:00): Servus ludwich,
sicher, dass es in der Kapellenfeldstraße
3* die Nummer 16 gibt ?
die beiden rechten waren
früher mal 19 und 21
philippec (2020-04-04 08:08:18+00:00): Boekt Boerenkrijgweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391650340/history#map=17/50.95041/4.49936&layers=D
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ZT-H14-3rVW_8EVmHLESoA
Waarom maakt u daar een weg van ?  Het is gewoon de rand van een veld.
wegspotter (2020-06-11 14:02:33+00:00): Deze waren zichtbaar tijdens de inventarisatie: https://qgiscloud.com/tragewegen/buurtwegopzoeken_qgiscloud/?bl=mapnik&l=Trage_wegen%2CWijzigingen%20Antwerpen!%2CWijzigingen%20Limburg%20(punten)!%2CWijzigingen%20Limburg%20(lijnen)!%2CWijzigingen%20Oost-Vlaanderen!%2CWijzigingen%20Vlaams-Brabant!%2CPerimeters%20ruilverkaveling!%2CAtlas%20der%20Buurtwegen!%2CNGI%20Basemap%201904!%2CNGI%20Basemap%201873!%2CNGI%20Basemap%201939!%2CNGI%20Basemap%201969!%2CNGI%20Basemap%201981!%2CNGI%20basemap%201989!%2CGRB-basiskaart!%2CCartoWeb-TOPO!&t=buurtwegopzoeken_qgiscloud&e=498837%2C6611740%2C502088%2C6613327
wegspotter (2020-06-11 14:03:05+00:00): Dat kan natuurlijk veranderd zijn. De inventaris is van 2014
veljovic (2022-12-28 06:11:38+00:00): 42,4991262, 19,7943814
Peak Zastanit
Hjart (2016-01-15 22:51:19+00:00): Both of the nodes touched in Copenhagen by this changeset had denomination=* as their only tag. One of them is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/80275898. You quite clearly didn't look at that one before changing it. Thank you for making me aware of it though. It will probably be deleted soon.
Please note that while there really wasn't any damage here, mechanical edits like this often can have unfortunate side effects though.
BCNorwich (2016-01-21 12:19:43+00:00): With respect, moorland should be tagged as moorland, and not be tagged as heath to suit the renderer even if it looks wrong. To do such tagging is to corrupt the database.
dgitto (2016-01-15 23:15:14+00:00): Via San Giuseppa?
dgitto (2016-01-15 23:15:28+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto
pasqse (2016-01-16 09:44:52+00:00): Ciao, già modificato! Grazie per la segnalazione
ngt (2016-01-15 22:07:50+00:00): hi, it seems you are editing large amounts of nodes all over the world. This is problematic and I couldn't find any topic on automated edits for you intention.
Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits and stop doing these edits until you followed the steps in the wiki.
Thanks
naoliv (2016-01-16 02:55:57+00:00): Bertolla, aqui não é o local mais apropriado para se adicionar locais onde ocorre furto, por exemplo.
naoliv (2016-01-16 03:20:45+00:00): Você precisa visualizar esses dados? Qual seria o uso?
Warin61 (2017-03-23 02:34:12+00:00): Err multipolygon 5866031 has no tags to say what it is! ... Its members also cross one another. The ways that from the multipolygon are tagged area=yes .. redundant. 

I have removed the area tags, resolved the ways into a simpler system and added the tag natural=scrub to the multipolygon.
Glenhope1 (2017-03-23 03:00:12+00:00): ok. good
messpert (2016-02-01 22:34:17+00:00): I have just noticed areas near Minions which are now marked a "heath". I have local knowledge and I do not think any of these areas generally fit the description of heath.
lilienthaler (2016-04-20 09:07:19+00:00): Hallo, zur Info, ich habe den Geldautomaten der Sparkasse Genthin in der Brandenburger Str. 26 gelöscht, da die Sparkasse schon mit atm=yes markiert ist. Gruß lilienthaler
escada (2016-10-13 12:34:55+00:00): Hallo Polyglot,

waarom krijgen bus stops die genoemd zijn naar een treinstation dezelfde wikipedia/wikidata tags ?
Polyglot (2016-10-13 14:23:05+00:00): Wat mij betreft, hoorden die bij elkaar. Al zou ik ook begrijpen dat je zegt dat het om verschillende 'concepten' gaat, maar dan is elke bushalte een apart wikidata item en zou je ze in wikidata op de een of andere wijze moeten zien te groeperen.
escada (2016-10-13 15:59:43+00:00): Behoort dan elke bushalte die "Kerk" noemt bij die kerk voor wikidata ?
Voor mij zijn het dus 2 verschillende concepten, dat had je al wel gedacht :-) Wikidata zal vermoedelijk verwijzen naar een Wikipedia artikel met daarin een beschrijving van het stationsgebouw, niet van de bushaltes in de buurt.
Wil je in Wikidata bushaltes en treinstations groeperen ? In zoiets als een "openbaar vervoersknooppunt" ?
mfdz (2019-08-10 05:27:46+00:00): Moin Stefan,
mache gerade einige Haltestellen-Auswertungen und bin dabei auf Deinen Edit hier gestoßen :-) Sollte
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3949073450 nicht ein highway=bus_stop haben? Gibt es einen Grund, weshalb Du explizit highway=no vergeben hast? Ist der Knoten nicht eher die stop_position?

VG (und einen schönen Urlaub!)
Holger
stk_ulm (2019-08-10 10:59:01+00:00): Aeh, gute Frage :D Ich kann leider nicht mehr nachvollziehen, warum ich das damals so getaggt habe. Im Zweifel einfach aendern!

Danke dir (und Urlaub macht nix, das ist ja Freizeitspass :D)
pnorman (2017-01-14 00:59:29+00:00): This changeset put a stray natural=wood tag on the UBC hospital building which I've removed
Zalitoar (2016-01-21 15:30:10+00:00): Al parecer la URL correcta del sitio web es www.refugiodemarmiramar.com.ar
nicolas17 (2016-01-21 16:09:24+00:00): Gracias por el comentario, corregido en http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36722991
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-16 00:07:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 36418715, 36600208, 36600720, 36602638, 36574125, 36602990, 36577065, 36600869, 36602797, 36599646, 36603043, 36469452, 36599097, 36487719, 36601976, 36601804, 36600628, 36599129, 36602600, 36602805, 36601029, 36599728, 36578919, 36602294, 36602748, 36535259, 36600224, 36603003, 36599731, 36604634, 36599619, 36578748, 36600625, 36600568, 36600301, 36600594, 36581359, 36406609, 36467038, 36458947, 36601158, 36601755, 36578813, 36600344, 36600339, 36604828, 36600633, 36603202, 36578788, 36601166, 36602392, 36600974, 36427851, 36573884, 36604391, 36599554, 36578852, 36601744, 36600083, 36578777, 36601982, 36603534, 36603685, 36452663, 36604684, 36602709, 36603178, 36599535, 36580375, 36601717, 36600600, 36578763, 36602370, 36577574, 36603200, 36578362, 36578912, 36450848, 36602862, 36579769, 36600978, 36600597, 36602793, 36598952, 36602970, 36604216, 36602975, 36578878, 36601954, 36367454, 36599092, 36602866, 36600089, 36603174, 36601767, 36460860, 36577543, 36600583, 36604268, 36578893, 36601960, 36602090, 36600213, 36599551, 36602926, 36600617, 36602630, 36578914, 36601751, 36600134, 36580214, 36601823, 36603944, 36600216, 36603085, 36603198, 36411206, 36601971, 36600035, 36600589, 36604132, 36599152, 36601739, 36604300, 36451281, 36573690, 36601088, 36602858, 36599141, 36601791, 36601044, 36602716, 36600970, 36537325, 36579543, 36577180, 36604141, 36600964, 36601187, 36600146, 36604276, 36602397, 36600143, 36602879, 36599739, 36602620, 36602984, 36578825, 36580502, 36599077, 36599456, 36600862, 36599965, 36600028, 36602745, 36603203, 36601184, 36573513, 36600387, 36602627, 36599185, 36604733, 36578226, 36577213, 36602634, 36599736, 36420265, 36599103, 36600818, 36599665, 36600740, 36604180, 36453150, 36460190, 36599547, 36452804, 36578858, 36603708, 36599668, 36601748, 36600558, 36599123, 36419476, 36600607, 36601082, 36600937, 36580042, 36600821, 36604449, 36600444, 36599778, 36600075, 36574233, 36600183, 36581394, 36599662, 36600309, 36452440, 36600394, 36600799, 36600605, 36602755, 36600099, 36603074, 36600070, 36599556, 36604201, 36601175, 36600453, 36602644, 36601962, 36602929, 36603182, 36600439, 36578738, 36603868, 36600614, 36599960, 36501762, 36601725, 36602812, 36578260, 36578802, 36599788, 36600430, 36600599, 36419287, 36429273, 36603775, 36599955, 36581230, 36600202, 36604162, 36600376, 36600958, 36599636, 36599782, 36603731, 36603982, 36601194, 36604518, 36600153, 36602758, 36599774, 36602647, 36602592, 36601797, 36462835, 36600926, 36602614, 36602609, 36581252, 36599542, 36578906, 36598928, 36604324, 36601179, 36601132, 36600390, 36600735, 36600916, 36599624, 36427375, 36599721.
Nakaner (2016-02-28 19:38:10+00:00): It looks like user عقبة بن نافع is not able/willed to discuss mechanical edits in advance. He did a multi-changeset (only very small changesets) mechanical denomination edit over the whole world today.

This is an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37421673 (I currently have an WhoDidIt feed on an randomly selected area of Berlin ;-) )

It is your own decision if what you want to do. (He has already received a block at that time https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
nyuriks (2017-02-25 22:55:28+00:00): This edit changed way 332308716 - religion= christian to "Zuluetismo." -- seems wrong - was that a revert bug?
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-10 07:55:30+00:00): Worth noting Druze are not a branch of Islam, Just as Christianity isn't a sub-branch of Judaism.
Владимир К (2016-02-13 08:48:50+00:00): просто хочу сказать спасибо за правильно обозначенную столовую через amenity=fast_food+fast_food=cafeteria :) редко такое встречается
GerdP (2016-01-16 07:07:58+00:00): Hallo!
Was bedeutet highway=footway
an einem Knoten mit 
public_transport=platform ?
Ich kenne highway=platform oder highway=bus_stop dafür, aber highway=footway ist eigentlich nur für Wege.