piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623322 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522850, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622350 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522869, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:44:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623329 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522952, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:46:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623343 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523066, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:46:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623390 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523105, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623392 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523141, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622962 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523278, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
indigomc (2016-10-01 20:13:06+00:00): Hi. Can you please state why you removed all the items in this changeset please?

I also note that in this and other changesets you seem to have made experimental changes in the live map, and added information that is not valid (e.g. adding the Fresh Reach supermarket with a unrelated US website listed on it). 

Please do not make any other edits until these matters are resolved.

Thanks, user indigomc
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622364 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523368, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622775 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523395, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622779 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523413, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623409 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523492, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623415 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42523515, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Владимир К (2016-10-03 06:56:16+00:00): Дороги по дачам принято рисовать не hw=track, а hw=unclassified или service. Потому что track это либо стихийная колея в лесу, либо дорога для сельскохозяйственной техники в поле. А то что дороги на дачах без покрытия не говорит о её статусе, для этого есть тэг surface. Надеюсь, вы переделаете дороги :)
Велькин Виктор (2016-10-03 07:40:41+00:00): Я пользуюсь и теги оставляю те, которые ставятся автоматически. Какая дорога и для каких целей используется мне не известно, я делаю правки для отображения на навигаторе.
Владимир К (2016-10-03 07:51:28+00:00): ставятся автоматически это что значит?
а про использование я же сказал. Внутри снт дороги точно не hw=track
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
DeBigC (2021-08-02 23:28:14+00:00): This place seems to be mothballed, along with all the buildings on the connecting cluster. I will leave one pin (there was a duplicate) and tag the building as discused=yes pending something else happening on that site
muralito (2016-09-30 02:26:37+00:00): Pablo ¿Que fue lo que quisiste mapear aca?
Kachkaev (2021-03-06 20:17:27+00:00): А что значит «нагибатор»? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444938037/history
Osm1980 (2016-09-29 17:39:44+00:00): برای وارد کردن روستاها از این سایتم کمک بگیرید بد نیست
http://www.irangpsmap.com/
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552721 where the changeset comment is: revert 77 changesets by user midhu ks after they were found to damage the map in India; no response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42533979 question yet but speedy revert deemed best solution
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
cadsauxk (2016-12-08 09:21:28+00:00): Olá Gabriel, obrigado pelas contribuições. Por favor não classifique estradas de terra como highway=track, esta denominação é reservada para trilhas agrícolas.

Qualquer dúvida entre em contato com a gente.

obrigado
cadsauxk (2016-12-08 09:54:22+00:00): Ah outra coisa. Evite colocar "Estrada" como "nome". No campo "nome" devem ir apenas nomes próprios, não as descrições. Por exemplo "Estrada que vai para tal lugar" não é um nome próprio.
obrigado
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
aixbrick (2016-09-30 06:32:15+00:00): Danke für's Korrigieren. Ich hatte den Verursacher auch schon darauf aufmerksam gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42487798
Durko_freemap (2016-10-03 06:24:59+00:00): Zdravim Lukas,
name=DOM prosim vymazte, ze ide o dom hovori tag building=yes. K highway=road(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Droad), vy viete, ze sa vola Zamocka, a neviete o aky typ cesty ide? nejak sa mi to nechce verit (tipujem track + niektory tag tracktype)http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dtrack. Vdaka za opravy. Durko
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
bxl-forever (2016-11-09 13:39:46+00:00): Dear Glenn,
This changeset is puzzling me.  It looks as if you have made lots of changes in Brussels street names based on a list out of UrbIS.  I use UrbIS data too, as it is very often a good referee about where a street officially starts and ends.
However, there seem to be a few cases with discrepancies vs. visible data on the street.
I have personally surveyed Rue de l’Évêque (starts with an accented É), Land-van-Luikstraatje (hyphens in the name) and Vier-windenstraat (hyphen in the name).  The official UrbIS map at http://geoloc.irisnet.be/ matches too (well, not the accented letters because the map represents everything in plain ASCII names, but street signs confirm that the É is part of the name).  This is why I am puzzled about the data you have been using for your changes, because people might have seen this as introducing mistakes.  Could you tell me more about the list you are using, so that I could spot other possible errors?
Glenn Plas (2016-11-09 13:54:59+00:00): damn. I based myself on the rule that accented letters in french is not ok. The list you can find in a pdf in the repository on github. I usually add this as a part of the changeset comments but didn't do this on this particualar set.   see https://github.com/gplv2/urbis-validate

But, I've been misinformed, apparently on names you should use accents. http://french.about.com/od/grammar/fl/How-to-Use-French-Accented-Capitals.htm

But if there were touched here, that means the there was a difference between the addr:street on the object and the name of the highway, that's why they popped up when validating.  Thanks for the remark.  I'll fix it back
Glenn Plas (2016-11-09 14:00:28+00:00): I can't see anything on http://geoloc.irisnet.be/ right now

If I get the official list, I'll add this in the validator, that would be awesome.
bxl-forever (2016-11-09 14:38:49+00:00): Okay, it’s great that we think alike.  In the mean time I had created an issue on GitHub, therefore sorry for raising the same issue twice.

geoloc.irisnet.be does not seem to provide a usable list, unfortunately the only visible part is a map (which requires Flash, grrr), but you can have a more usable map here: http://data-mobility.irisnet.be/ even though I think that they also miss the "É" in their names (we can export dataset and retrieve how names are spelled).
Glenn Plas (2016-11-09 17:04:33+00:00): No, by all means, tx for raising this, I'm addicted to improving and structuring data and it flatters me you take the time to check my work.  Excellent.  It's all about improving it.  Keep the issue open on github.  I had a hard time finding streetname lists and that doc looked was  better than anything I've seen (spelling wise it's quite accurate except accented letters).  If such a list doesn't exist, I'll create it.
Glenn Plas (2017-04-21 08:22:11+00:00): I made a github comment addreses to you , I want to fix the mistakes I made but I need some help to get source data.  Tx
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552721 where the changeset comment is: revert 77 changesets by user midhu ks after they were found to damage the map in India; no response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42533979 question yet but speedy revert deemed best solution
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
elefn (2016-09-29 18:13:02+00:00): Ich verstehe, dass Sie das genau taggen wollen, aber in diesem Fall ist das zu viel des guten gewesen. Das Routing ist hier wichtiger. Wenn da jemand mit dem Rad langkommt - und das fahren täglich hunderte mit dem Rad entlang - dann kann derjenige vo Ort entscheiden, ob er die 10m an der Beustelle vorbei schiebt oder doch durchfährt. Ich beobachte eigentlich immer eher letzteres. Ich hoffe sie verstehen das. Gruß
SomeoneElse (2016-09-30 13:33:29+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297897760/history really called "stay in washington" or is it just a hotel that you are staying at in Washington?
Best Regards,
Andy
Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap.Действительно ли называется https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297897760/history "stay in washington", или это просто отель, что вы остановились в Вашингтоне?С наилучшими пожеланиями,Энди
uvi (2017-02-21 16:25:52+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4424078110 Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636320 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42525928, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
Commodoortje (2016-10-03 05:41:42+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Welke naam heeft de door u aangebrachte supermarkt? Is de naam Hoogvliet, dan is deze supermarkt nu dubbel in OSM geplaatst.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636318 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526023, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
muralito (2020-06-05 19:32:28+00:00): Hola. Es viejo el cambio, pero en la wiki dice que police=* es para los lugares de policia que no atienden publico, o sea el amenity=police vendria a ser excluyente con el police=station, al menos por como lo interpreto.
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:09:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636313 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526085, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:09:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636310 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526132, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
carciofo (2016-10-23 20:08:01+00:00): Carlos,
Bienvenido a OSM y gracias por sus contribuciones. Desafortunadamente las ediciones han aparecido en las herramientas de calidad de datos principalmente porque se mapearon rutas de bus como carreteras/calles una sobre la otra. Esto debe hacerse mediante una relación de transporte público. Antes de continuar mapeando estas rutas de bus, lo invito a que visite la página wiki respectiva http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buses y se familiarice con el proceso de mapeo para estas rutas. De igual forma lo invito a registrarse en la lista de correo de OSM Colombia en https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co donde puede hacer preguntas y obtener ayuda de la comunidad de maperos locales. Si tiene alguna pregunta adicional no dude en ponerse en contacto. Cordial saludo.
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636302 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526194, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636300 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526209, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:08:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636297 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526259, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:08:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636293 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526290, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636290 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526302, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636283 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526330, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 17:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42636261 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42526479, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
vichada (2016-09-29 21:34:03+00:00): Sorry changeset commend should be ...
#hotosm-project-2142 #osmafrica #MissingMaps  ...
eggie (2019-12-04 10:02:18+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
zstadler (2018-04-16 13:44:46+00:00): Hello IbnTēšfīn,
.
In this edit you have added an "ele=6" tag to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110058089
.
As far as I see, the elevation near the Cave of the Patriarchs is about 885 meters above sea level.
Did you have some other property in mind?
Perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels ?
BeKri (2016-09-30 09:14:00+00:00): Servus Hans,
ich kann die Gebietsverschiebung nördlich der Moosschwaige nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Ist da aus versehen was verschoben worden ?
Siehe http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42528787
Hans Loderer (2016-09-30 14:00:14+00:00): Hall Bekri,
war gestern mit dem Tad in der Gegend dabei sind mir ein paar Umschärfen im landuse aufgefallen, im bing-Luftbild fielen mir dann weitere Dinge auf die ich korrigiert hab, dabei musste ich ein Multipolygon auflösen. Großflächige Verschiebung sollte es dabei aber nicht gegben haben.
Gruß Hans
BeKri (2016-09-30 17:24:11+00:00): Servus Hans,
schau Dir bitte kurz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444967529#map=18/48.15621/11.38560 an, speziell im südlichen Bereich nach links/ Westen verschoben und ausfällig, daß er jetzt durch die Weiher schneidet ...
BTW: die Weiher lagen und liegen jetzt auch in der Wald-Schraffur (weiß nicht, ob das vorher so war)
Gruss derBeKri
BeKri (2016-09-30 17:31:38+00:00): PS:
Hab mir die History von (willkürlich)
node 4156307887
node 1978381727
node 4156307860
in JOSM angesehen,
die sind alle 22,9 Meter "in den Westen gewandert".
Mit der Bearbeitung von
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/46608584
ist der Rest südlich ev. verrutscht.
Gruss derBeKri
BeKri (2016-09-30 17:44:21+00:00): PSPS:
Grad fällt mir auf: Mit nördlich der Moosschweige meine ich nördlich von 
GUT Moosschweige, nicht dem Gebiet ansich, das wäre ja schon Aubinger Lohe ...
Hab mich wohl verwirrend ausgedrückt
Hans Loderer (2016-09-30 19:59:52+00:00): Hallo Bekri,
der Way wurde wohl tatsächlich versehentlich nach Westen verschoben, hab versucht das anhand des Luftbilds wieder intetwa zurückzuschieben. Die Weiher lagen auch vorher schon im Wald, hab auf dem Tablet noch eine offline-Version (osmand) so dass ich den früheren Datenstand noch sehen kann.
Gruß Hans
mueschel (2016-10-04 11:05:16+00:00): Hi,
this node has many strange tags, I think they can be removed? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4424251733

Did you check the license of your source? Is it compatible with ODbL?

Jan
Arlas (2016-09-30 14:54:00+00:00): Hi, please stop creating this bus station point. There is already a bus_station area with correct tags.
olehz (2016-09-30 08:47:35+00:00): а навіщо ти совав обєкти вчора по місту? там все по GPS вирівняно до метра-двох - сумнівно, що в онлайн-редакторі то можна якось краще зробити (там навіть усіх треків не видно)
Myazyk (2016-09-30 20:31:49+00:00): Я нічого тут не переміщав, дорогу дорисував