piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-12 11:29:38+00:00): Dat komt omdat ik geleerd heb door nooit op de adresgegevens waar de BAG in staat wijzigingen aan te brengen. 

Door o.a. telefoonnummers en websites toe te voegen heb ik namelijk een keer commentaar gehad dat dit niet mag op een adres tag.

Mij werd toen gevraagd om alleen nieuwe tags aan te maken.

Zoals je ziet is het huisnummer nu niet van de kaart af te lezen terwijl dat wel te zien is bij andere gebouwen.
eggie (2019-11-12 11:37:27+00:00): Oke..nu begrijp ik het., maar dan heeft de adviserende mapper je helaas op het verkeerde been gezet. 
Sinds we vanuit de BAG importeren voegen we de info gewoon op de BAGadresnodes bij. Je zou anders alleen maar dubbelingen kijgen. 
Dat je het huisnummer niet ziet is geen probleem. Sommigen zien dat inderdaad als een nadeel.  De meeste kaarten laten de nummers helemaal niet zien. Alleen de mapnik toevallig wel. 
Het adres is uiteraard wel vindbaar en daar gaat het om. Bij appartementen liggen de adresnodes vaak op een hoopje bij de hoofdingang. Makkelijk voor bezorgdiensten. 
Je zou deze mapper duidelijk kunnen maken dat het nu anders gaat. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 11:41:36+00:00): Zie hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3590701350

De source_date heb ik nog even hersteld.
booktiger (2019-12-19 03:34:37+00:00): Please do not add bus stops repeatedly.
请不要重复添加公交车站
user_5359 (2019-11-12 19:26:22+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
Please check the relation https://www.osm.org/relation/9852674, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852675, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852676, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852677, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852678, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852679, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852680, https://www.osm.org/relation/9852681
zyphlar (2019-11-12 21:11:46+00:00): review:
hi there! looks pretty good. FYI parking aisles should *only* be the in-between aisles of a large lot that are only used to find a parking space, and driveways should generally be a stand-alone thing going right up to a building like at your house, or perhaps a loading dock.

to be most accurate, i believe the recommended way is to tag everything used for getting in and out of the parking lot as a service road. you can leave the back-and-forth in-between rows as parking_aisles.
blacklamb (2019-11-12 21:34:04+00:00): Updated them to service roads and checked in
zyphlar (2019-11-17 19:34:32+00:00): looks great! the very last thing is that a parking aisle that isn't inside a parking lot is often flagged as weird, so consider drawing some boxes around the areas of your business where parking spaces can be found, and tagging them as parking lots. details such as customer/public/private access, fees, # of spaces/handicap, etc, can also be added as desired.
thanks for your contribution!
zyphlar (2019-11-17 19:36:11+00:00): (i should mention the opposite is also true: a parking lot without any roads going into it is flagged as weird. as you can see just south of your property, the most minimal parking situation is often a service road going into a parking lot area.)
Violaine_Do (2019-12-13 08:57:37+00:00): Hello Luen, Thanks for your edits! I was wondering if you were sure the silos you marked were real silos. The SAU (urbanism service, local geographic institute) has info on it, and it says its storage tank for water... i've changed it to storage tank as it seems logical to me (location + local habits), and they have the official data. Please let me know if there is an issue with that...
Luen Warneke (2019-12-16 03:42:28+00:00): They are in fact water storage tanks - thanks for the edits. I thought that's what silos could be used for water - my mistake.
parukhin (2019-12-01 23:01:51+00:00): Здравствуйте, Елена.
Подскажите, пожалуйста, источники адресных данных, которые вы добавляете на карту (вносите в базу OSM)?
skquinn (2019-11-12 02:26:26+00:00): Changeset comment should be: Update business info
Source should be: survey

JOSM somehow got the bright idea to just upload this before I could change these.
Kuritsyn Roman (2019-11-26 12:13:12+00:00): What are the reasons for removing this road? This is a T-junction with a gentle entry from the east and an exit from the tertiary. One-way roads.
chnav (2019-11-26 13:12:46+00:00): Я смотрел это удаление. В принципе удалено правильно т.к. там одна проезжая часть в каждом направлении (с "островком безопасности"), а были обрисованы следы от шин. Единственное я бы ещё спрямил эти повороты.
chnav (2019-11-26 13:13:25+00:00): Если бы не ромбик посередине - там вообще обычный T-образный.
Kuritsyn Roman (2019-11-26 13:41:09+00:00): Там с восточной стороны плавный въезд в поворот. С запада поворот на лево под 90 градусов возможен по правилам и так же выезд с парковки от магазинов. Разделение идёт на двеа односторонних участка с широким въездом.
Как лучше в таких случаях поступать, чтоб не было крюков с одной стороны и резких поворотов при наличии плавного поворота с другой стороны?
chnav (2019-11-26 19:47:14+00:00): ИМО лучше всего рисовать максимально прямую линию, совпадающую с центральной линией примыкающей улицы или проезжей части. А кто и как срезает уже неважно. наоборот, некоторые навигаторы могут не понять такой плавный изгиб и вообще не показать перекрёсток.
IslaContoy (2019-11-28 01:12:34+00:00): Thanks for the comments. The intersection looks good to me now.
PT-53 (2019-11-13 08:45:45+00:00): Hallo  j1scad,
Du hast an dieser Brücke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674504434/history
das Merkmal highway=disused in highway=path + disused=yes abgeändert.
Gem. Wiki müßte es aber disused:higway=path lauten.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:disused:&uselang=de
Das Merkmal access=no wäre damit auch überflüssig.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-15 10:51:59+00:00): Hallo j1scad, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
j1scad (2019-11-19 05:01:18+00:00): disused=yes entfernt, Brücke soll noch in Karte sichtbar bleiben
PT-53 (2019-11-19 10:49:28+00:00): Ist der Weg auf der Brücke nur vorübergehend oder dauerhaft gesperrt?
Geste27 (2019-11-21 20:27:39+00:00): Hallo Zusammen
bzlg. "Brücke soll noch in Karte sichtbar bleiben", vielleicht wäre dann eine Fläche mit 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
passend, um dieses Ziel zu erreichen...
g27
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:50:10+00:00): Hallo j1scad, 
ein anderer Mapper hat zwischenzeitlich den Weg über die Kinzig gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674504434/history
Damit die Brücke weiterhin in der Karte angezeigt wird, könntest Du diese ja mit man_made=bridge einzeichnen und mit einer description versehen, daß der Weg selbst gesperrt ist.
j1scad (2019-12-09 15:14:11+00:00): wurde ja offenbar abgerissen, habe mal abandoned:highway mit der History und der zugehörigen Note eingetragen
user_5359 (2019-11-12 19:32:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please paint for every housenumber a separate node with the address information.
viloan (2019-11-12 02:51:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
j03lar50n (2019-11-14 21:03:03+00:00): thanks, Ian. I missed that one
allisonault (2019-11-12 04:30:37+00:00): Outlined buildings
Carto'Cité (2019-11-20 13:09:57+00:00): Hi,
The turn restriction don’t concern Place Paul Verlaine (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56123540). Looking at this recent picture (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/pj8Z0jy8k5m2ojvSarOPxw) the turn restriction concern Rue Chéreau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10588190) and it is already described with the oneway tag. I remove the turn restriction you have added. Feel free to contact me if you have any quesion or comment. And please consider bicycles access in you edits :)
Charles de Carto’Cité for #CartoVeloIdF
aepunavy (2019-11-21 06:23:38+00:00): Hi Carto'Cite,

Thank you for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I will take this as a leaning for my future edits and will be more careful while adding data in OSM. Let me know in case you have any other suggestion. Will be happy to learn from the local community.

Best Regards
aepunavy
Carto'Cité (2019-11-21 10:00:03+00:00): Hi Aepunavy,
Thank you for your response. No problems with mistakes :)
Feel free to ask if you have any question. If you contribute a lot, maybe you should consider using JOSM even if iD is great :)
Best regards.
Charles from Carto’Cité
allisonault (2019-11-12 04:30:03+00:00): Outlined buildings
真中あお (2025-12-12 12:15:14+00:00): 您好，这个变更集中对宜兴碑刻博物馆的编辑有一些小问题：
虽然iD编辑器默认博物馆是建筑，但这个博物馆不是单体建筑，那么应该删除building=yes标签；
name:zh键是用于填写中文名的，也就是说，在中国非少数民族地区，其内容应该是与name键一致的。
至于别名，可以填写在alt_name、loc_name等键中。
我已经在对上述情况进行修改。
祝编安~
Glassman (2019-11-12 06:48:45+00:00): Can you also add a name to the street? That would really help people find it.
Glassman (2019-11-12 06:42:38+00:00): Tip: The editor allows saving of the address tags when the building is gone.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76939447
Heinz_V (2019-11-12 07:50:05+00:00): You deleted part of the Nepal/India border???
I made corrections.
AMla96 (2019-11-12 08:07:36+00:00): The region is a part of Nepal but was claimed by India in its latest map released last week. The border should not be changed by OSM until this conflict is resolved.
Heinz_V (2019-11-12 08:54:24+00:00): With your edits you corrupted a lot of relations!!
muzirian (2019-11-12 09:10:30+00:00): @amla96 main borders are mapped based on internationally accepted borders, not by a single country's claim. Please discuss these kind of chnages on relevant lists or groups before editing. And please don't break existing data like relations when editing.
AMla96 (2019-11-12 09:41:23+00:00): @muzirian Thanks for letting me know. I will start a discussion on this subject.

@Heinz_V I did split the feature before deletion. i don't know how the relations got corrupted but thank you very much for fixing them. 

The border seems to be newly added to OSM after India's claim and was not there before. OSM is used as a basemap in many Nepal Government websites (which we develop) and many complaints are being made to us about this issue.
Ro Sun (2019-11-13 04:50:15+00:00): @amla96 you can't change/delete international conflict border like this until the conflict is resolved. 
@heinz_v @muzirian, I think we should revert this changeset.
AMla96 (2019-11-13 05:00:07+00:00): @Ro Sun Yes, please revert this changeset. Also, if possible, can any of you please tag both boundaries currently shown with an admin_level 4 so that they are both shown as a dashed line until the conflict is resolved (like how Google Maps handled it). Imagine the confusion in Nepal when the international border just moved overnight.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-03 05:26:02+00:00): can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3868188 ?
viloan (2019-11-12 05:48:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chnav (2019-11-25 13:27:41+00:00): Реклама удалена, некоторые теги перенесены на уже существовавшую ранее точку клиники.
Heinz_V (2019-11-12 07:48:56+00:00): Why did you changed the mapping of the disputed border?
eggie (2019-11-12 07:43:38+00:00): Dag dzzls. 
Je hebt met maps.me name:nl en name:en toegevoegd. Dat is niet correct.
name:nl wordt alleen buiten Nederland gebruikt en in Friesland. 
Er is hier verder geen Engelse naam. name=Twente actief is hetgeen je ziet op de kaart. Dat blijft dus zo.. 
Wat was je bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 07:51:31+00:00): Ik heb name:nl veranderd in name=  .. Nu zal het wel goed renderen. Verder phone toegevoegd.
name:en=  verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 08:01:23+00:00): Kijk ook even hier

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental
Shops that rent several vehicles

    shop=rental

Examples :

    motorcycle:rental=yes/no
    bicycle:rental=yes/no
    car:rental=yes/no
    atv:rental=yes/no
    snowmobile:rental=yes/no
    ski:rental=yes/no
    jetski:rental=yes/no
    boat:rental=yes/no
    kayak:rental=yes/no
ralley (2019-11-12 23:50:39+00:00): Please don't put descriptions like "Forklift Only" in the name tag - it is for the name only.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76941716
❤️‍🔥 (2019-11-13 03:53:08+00:00): Apologies; fixed in #76989857
skquinn (2019-11-12 07:53:58+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This is a good first edit, but in the future, when there is an existing node for a church, shop, etc, it is better to merge this information into a building way rather than leaving the node with the duplicate information in place. (I did this just now.)
user_5359 (2019-11-12 19:42:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the new highway with the existing highways.
Klioda (2019-11-28 09:24:55+00:00): Какой смысл удалять информацию?
Какой смысл заменять русскую Википедию на белорусскую в теге wikipedia?
=/
user_6110846 (2019-11-28 18:01:03+00:00): я сносил добавление евровики  возникло  дохера конфликтов
ndm (2019-11-12 09:46:03+00:00): Please don't add in surveyed items.I will revert this there's no reason to add add an unsigned restriction here.
YaStratospheric (2019-11-13 10:42:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment. 

There is the road markings that regulate traffic are clearly visible on satellite images, so I assume that this ""only straight"" is clearly signed. Also, the driver’s report confirmed, as he drove on and did not turn around in this place. 
This kind of intersections between roads may be assumed by navigation engines as crossings with allowed u-turn, and that may confuse the driver. We are working not only on data as a community, we are also always trying to make OSM data better for end users.
Please share, maybe there is other way to prevent this false u-turn?
ndm (2019-11-13 20:32:12+00:00): Disallow ~180 degree turns from your routing would be an obvious idea -- as it happens I have seen u-turns at that point (whether they were legal is another matter).
YaStratospheric (2019-11-14 11:36:53+00:00): Disallowing 180-degree turns maybe have a chance to solve this problem, but it definately destroy navigation.

As it explained in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction, "*Don't map* turn restrictions that are *the default* for a given jurisdiction *and* are *not signed*".  As I said before, there is the road markings that regulates traffic and they are clearly visible on satellite images, so I assume that this "only straight" is clearly signed. This is an "implicit restriction", i.e. that discussed here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Implicit_access_restrictions , and more information you can read here: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/implicit-restrictions/ .

I'll fix back your revert with implicit=yes tag, to be more exact.
axelr (2020-04-13 11:37:43+00:00): Frage zu Platform Philharmonie: 
Du hast die Bahnsteighöhe partiell von 92 Meter auf 24 Meter geändert. Ist dazwischen eine Rampe oder gibt es Stufen im Verlauf des Bahnsteigs ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-25 14:53:08+00:00): Why you added osm_type=node tag to for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6968440957 ?
arafin (2022-09-25 17:28:12+00:00): by mistakenly added the tag
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 05:00:10+00:00): what about full_id ?
arafin (2022-09-26 05:41:35+00:00): These were on field collected data. So I checked the data error (like osm tag and spelling mistake) in XML format by QGIS software, that's why two rows automatically added- one was osm_type and second one full_id. 
Unfortunately, I uploaded the file with the two tags before deleting the tags.
RicoElectrico (2019-11-12 14:43:32+00:00): Cześć, czy tam znajduje się na ziemi jakiś permanentny sklep? Albo chociaż oznaczone miejsce? Byłbym wdzięczny za źródło.

Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki - punkt o weryfikowalności.
Glassman (2019-11-12 17:48:15+00:00): Your edit looks good. I would have probably made a couple of highway=service+service=drivethrough around what looks like a coffee stand.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76947873
eggie (2019-11-12 09:09:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 09:18:33+00:00): Dag Libithina  iets aan gebouwen veranderen heeft door periodieke import soms weinig zin. Je kun de "fout" wel doorgeven aan het Kadaster dmv een terugmelding naar het kadaster. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=hogeweg%2098%20uit&resultOffset=0&objectId=0450100000001852&geometry.x=108908.32400427&geometry.y=504327.04299851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 09:46:57+00:00): 'k Zie dat m'n  "t" weer eens weigert. :(
Geef svp in het Engels commentaar bij je Afrikaanse edits. 
Gr Eggie
Libithina (2019-11-12 12:20:21+00:00): Dank je voor de feedback (en sorry dat ik ze nu pas lees). Ik zal voortaan Engels gebruiken bij niet Nederlandse maps.
eggie (2019-11-12 09:11:28+00:00): Probeer svp aan te geven wat je edits inhouden. 
In OSM taggen we bij op de al bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet nog eens een adres toevoegen. Wel kun je het restaurant dus samenvoegen met de juiste adresnode.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 09:20:39+00:00): adres verwijderd.. info samengevoegd met adresnode
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
Dimacn (2019-11-13 10:27:46+00:00): Для внесения адресной информации существуют определённые теги, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Не надо писать названия жилым домам в name. В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
eggie (2019-11-12 09:23:52+00:00): Ziet er goed uit. Wanneer je iets wil doen voor "missingmaps" kun je ook inloggen 

HOT Map inloggen 
https://tasks.hotosm.org/

Je krijgt dan een eigen tegel en zit elkaar niet in de weg. 
Ook worden dan je edits gevalideerd.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 11:45:39+00:00): Dag Jan... waarom nu steeds opnieuw een fietsenzaak hier?
Je "dubbeling" zal ik verwijderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 11:46:54+00:00): reverted by · changeset #76957460
Jakka (2019-11-13 13:23:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744562149#map=16/50.6428/3.9923
votre footway vous avez mis en double sur des track déjà dans database. SVP correction. et petit réponse
hatul (2021-06-05 19:20:48+00:00): הגדר סביב השמורה (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744564809) חוסמת את השביל האדום? כדאי לסמן חסימה אם כן.
rik_ (2019-11-16 06:19:18+00:00): Hi,

hier muss ich mal kurz nachfragen. Du hast die `smoothness` auf `impassable` geändert. Das würde bedeuten, dass man hier mit Radfahrzeugen nicht durchkommt[1]. Der Weg[2] ist aber leicht schon mit einem Trekkingrad fahrbar, ich würde hier eher `bad` vergeben. Oder sehe ich hier etwas falsch?

Viele Grüße

rik

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32642222
Osmegnos (2019-11-17 19:41:26+00:00): Hi, 
smoothness geht von excellent ( u.a. rollerblade) in 8 Stufen auf impassanle runter. 
Bad = 4 Stufe = robust wheels: tracking bike, car etc. horrible = 6 = heavy duty offroad
Deshalb habe ich: impassable genommen, weil man nicht mit einem PKW, geschweige denn einem heavy duty offroad da lang fahren kann.
Wenn path allerdings das fahren mit KFZ ausschließt, kann man auf bad zurück ändern.

VG
rik_ (2019-11-18 06:33:46+00:00): Hi,

also die Beschreibung des `smoothness`-Tags[1] schließt ja alle Arten von Radfahrzeugen ein, wozu auch Fahrräder, Rollstühle usw. gehören. Es gibt sogar Karten, die Wege entsprechend der Smoothness darstellen und so der Routenplanung hilfreich sind[2].

Ein Pfad dürfte überdies per Definition auf Grund seiner Breite in vermutlich fast allen Fällen nicht für zweispurige KFZ befahrbar sein, was das smoothness-Tag ja überflüssig machen würde.

Ich denke also, dass man bei der Vergabe des smoothness-Tags alle Arten von Radfahrzeugen berücksichtigen muss - in diesem Fall klappt die Befahrung wie gesagt sogar mit dem Trekkingbike, also würde `smoothness=bad` gut passen.

Viele Grüße :-)

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
[2] https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=13.619008&lat=52.366161&zoom=14&num=1&mt0=mapnik-bw&mt-1=ol_bbbike-smoothness&mt-1p=80
Osmegnos (2019-11-18 08:52:12+00:00): Hi, 
Danke für die Info. Ich habe smoothness=bad angepasst

Viele Grüße zurück.
rik_ (2019-11-18 08:54:28+00:00): Hi,

vielen Dank :-)

Bis denne