piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-04-11 21:17:44+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-11 21:25:05+00:00): Ter overweging...
Fout is het niet om met access= no te beginnen. Had de voorgaande mapper (en niet de minste) al gedaan, maar dan krijg je wel hele waslijsten wie er dan wel overheen mogen. snow_scooter, mofa(snorfiets) , moped(brommer)??
access=no is dat witte bord met de rode rand.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
DoDoMR (2017-04-12 04:47:05+00:00): Hallo,
anhand welcher Quellen hast Du denn diese Änderungen vorgenommen?
Es muss nicht unbedingt sein, dass eine Unterkunft, die "Ferienwohnung" heißt, unbedingt auch ein tourism=apartment ist. Viele Hotels haben auch Ferienwohnungen, ohne gleich tourism=apartment zu sein.
Wichtig ist hierbei m.E. im Wiki folgender Passus: "Im Gegensatz zu Hotels, Pensionen und Gasthöfen gibt es in der Regel keine Angebote wie Frühstück, Bar und Rezeption.

Es können eine oder mehrere Einheiten in einem Wohnhaus existieren, in dem ggf. auch der Vermieter wohnt oder mehrere Einheiten in einem eigenen Gebäude, das nur der Vermietung dient."
Ein Tagging nur anhand der Bezeichnung "Ferienwohnung" ist m.E. nicht korrekt.
geow (2017-04-12 07:18:31+00:00): Hallo DoDoMR, vielen Dank für dein Feedback.

Der Begriff Ferienwohnung ist sowohl umgangssprachlich als auch im Wiki ziemlich eindeutig: Die notwendige und kennzeichnende Eigenschaft einer FeWo ist, dass eine eigene Küche/Bad vorhanden ist. 

Die Ergänzung lt. Wiki "Im Gegensatz zu Hotels, Pensionen und Gasthöfen gibt es in der Regel keine Angebote wie Frühstück, Bar und Rezeption." bedeutet nur, dass es in Einzelfällen auch bei FeWo diese Angebote geben kann. Ein Frühstücksservice ist in DE z.B. gar nicht so selten. Deshalb wird aus einer FeWo aber kein Hotel oder Pension. Nur wenn der Betreiber auch noch Zimmer anbietet, ist zusätzlich oder als separater POI hotel oder guest_house gerechtfertigt.

Ich habe übrigens alle Objekte einzeln geprüft und evtl. Mehrfachangebote entsprechend berücksichtigt, wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278319645

tourism=apartment wurde erst 2014 eingeführt, daher ist es nachvollziehbar, dass Mapper früher chalet, guest_house, hotel etc. in Verbindung mit beschreibenden Namen für FeWo verwendet haben.

Es ist übrigens absehbar, dass tourism=apartment auf der Standardkarte demnächst gerendert wird.

BG
geow
DoDoMR (2017-04-12 07:31:18+00:00): Hallo,
zunächst vielen Dank für Deine Antwort, mit der ich mich nur z.T. anfreunden kann.
Heißt "einzeln" überprüft, dass Du diese Ferienwohnungen vor Ort geprüft hast bzw. bei den Anbietern angefragt hast, ob es sich tatsächlich um Ferienwohnungen handelt?
Deiner Definition entsprechend würde es bedeuten, dass Du auch Hotels mit tourism=hotel; apartment taggen würdest, wenn in einem Hotel nur eine Ferienwohnung vorhanden ist?

Meiner Meinung nach ist hier das Wiki in der Tat eindeutig: Nämlich, dass tourism=apartment nur dann gilt, wenn z.B. in einem Privathaus eine (oder mehrere) Ferienwohnungen angeboten werden. Wenn in einer Pension / einem Hotel nur einzelne Ferienwohnungen vorhanden sind, ansonsten aber ein normaler "Pension- bzw. Hotelbetrieb" vorherrscht, wäre entsprechend tourism=hotel bzw. tourism=guest_house korrekt.

VG,
Thorsten
geow (2017-04-12 07:38:46+00:00): Thorsten, ich melde mich heute Abend.
BG Klaus
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
FTA (2017-04-12 14:22:00+00:00): Hi dgroth,
Great to see another mapper in the Madison!  If you run into any problems or have a question about mapping, don't hesitate to give me a shout. Welcome to OSM!
Best,
Ethan aka FTA
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Mashin (2017-04-12 14:06:37+00:00): Hello,
I would like to let you know that your changes completely disconnected several roads from Broadway, which made Whalley Avenue a dead end street. And also caused Broadway to be renamed to Dixwell Avenue.

This is a serious misconduct bordering with vandalism. I am writing this, because it not the first time such a thing happened on your side. OSM is a collaborative effort of many people and is used by many projects. Behavior like this has a detrimental effect on OSM data and community. Please, refrain from such edits in future.


I am reverting this whole changeset.
Yale University (2017-04-13 14:37:57+00:00): Hi Mashin,

Apologies, we are using Mapbox and for some reason the left half of Broadway was not showing up so we tried to extend the main street down. Thankfully the revert also seemed to fix our Mapbox problem, so we appreciate your assistance and will make sure not to make any reckless changes in the future!
FredrikLindseth (2017-05-23 07:02:25+00:00): Looks like this hotel is misplaced by 500m to the south of the correct location.
I moved the tags over and removed this duplicate 🙂
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 07:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48417098 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some deletions and other odd edits.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
johnny_1982 (2018-01-04 21:32:16+00:00): Hello Pablo,
I noticed, that you added a lot of highway=footway in the Andes in Peru. Like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486222628
Please check the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
I guess for this way (and others) highway=path would be better. It seems like people use these ways with motorcycles and cars. I crossed Peru on a bicycle and also drove the PE-24. I cannot remember any real footways here.
Johnny
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Richard (2017-05-16 19:21:32+00:00): Hi! Great to see all the work you're doing - especially adding surface tags.

The highway=secondary surprises me a bit - a road like this would usually be tagged highway=unclassified. In developed countries in OSM, highway=secondary is almost always a paved road with a centreline. OSM doesn't use State or Federal Functional Classification systems.

If you'd like to discuss it more widely then the talk-us mailing list is probably the best place to do that - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/
Stretch Longfellow (2017-06-12 15:32:54+00:00): I based all of these classifications off of the guide on the wiki. If this is not correct, then the wiki needs to be updated.
Richard (2017-06-12 15:34:53+00:00): Could you say which page in particular? There are several contradictory pages on the wiki.
Stretch Longfellow (2017-06-12 15:37:10+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Functional_Classification_System
Richard (2017-06-12 15:46:02+00:00): Thanks. Yikes - that's a horribly out-of-date document and shouldn't be used for anything at all. I'll edit the wiki accordingly.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
eggie (2017-04-12 08:13:47+00:00): Kan het zijn dat het fietspad vanaf de Rozebottleweg als surface misschien fine_gravel heeft? dan routeert het als verhard net als shells en compacted. Gravel is bijna niet te fietsen en wordt als onverhard gezien in bv de openfietsmap.
Leovlie (2017-04-12 09:05:18+00:00): Dat lijkt mij een goede optie. Het linkerdeel is zoals vele paden op Vlieland opgebouwd uit kleischelpen en geld formeel als halfverharding. Het rechterdeel loopt nu deels over het met tegel verharde schoolplein.
eggie (2017-04-12 10:45:04+00:00): Oke... pas jij het aan?
Leovlie (2017-04-12 11:25:16+00:00): Is goed
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
manoharuss (2017-04-12 05:55:42+00:00): Hi Charlie818,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But this neighborhood you deleted seems to be legit :(

I am restoring the feature tags as this neighborhood label is missing from the map. 



Best,

Manohar
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
majkaz (2017-04-12 10:54:29+00:00): Ahoj, ta natural=grassland je podle mého špatně, není to "divoce" rostoucí travina ale udržovaný trávník, takže spíš landuse=grass. Můžeš na to kouknout?
A prosím Tě, piš do změn co opravdu měníš, "fix" není komentář, který by k něčemu byl.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 07:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48417098 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some deletions and other odd edits.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
majkaz (2017-04-12 10:35:16+00:00): Ahoj,
můžeš prosím tě přestat označovat jako "fix" přidávání parků na všechna místa, kde je kousek trávníku? Chtělo by to do sad změn opravdu psát shrnutí toho, co se změnilo.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Trainguyrom (2017-04-11 22:25:25+00:00): Is "Stonebridge Apartments" the correct name for that building, and is it actually 123? I only got the first two numbers while driving past and my contact who lives there can't get back to me on that for a couple of days.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
DD1GJ (2017-04-12 07:37:10+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 verursacht Probleme durch suboptimale Speicherung. Mach daher bitte ein Update auf die aktuelle Version 0.7. Vielen Dank

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2019-06-22 16:32:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
glibbertorsten (2017-07-19 12:14:00+00:00): Hi! Darf ich fragen, auf was genau dein witziger Kommentar und deine Änderungen abzielen?
;-)
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
todrobbins (2017-04-11 23:48:40+00:00): Looks good! Any questions on editing?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].