piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JochenOSM (2021-01-17 14:08:47+00:00): Hallo Ebenich,
du hattest diesen Namen schon einmal in Change 92194400 getaggt, ohne eine Quelle oder einen hilfreichen Kommentar anzugeben. Ich hatte im dortigen Changeset nachgefragt wie du auf diesen Namen kommst aber keine Antwort erhalten. Daher hatte ich ihn mit entsprechender Begründung entfernt. Du hast ihn hier nun wieder ohne Quellenangabe oder einen hilfreichen Kommentar eingetragen. Ich würde immer noch gerne wissen woher du den Namen "WIKA-Kreisel" hast? Bitte einfach auf diesen Kommentar antworten, das Feld ist für solche Rückfragen gedacht.
Ebenich (2021-01-30 10:57:55+00:00): Hallo allerseits,
also ich wohn hier in der Nähe und für alle Leute hier ist das der "Wika-Kreisel", um ihn vom nächsten Kreisel 200 m weiter zu unterscheiden. Staatsstraße ist das alles, sogar noch der dritte Kreisel in Klingenberg. Das macht keine Unterscheidung.
JochenOSM (2021-02-01 13:35:32+00:00): Hallo Ebenich,

danke für deine Rückmeldung. Du solltest aber nicht einfach Namen "erfinden". Wenn ein Kreisel keinen eigenen _offiziellen_ Namen hat, dann hat er eben keinen. Als ich zuletzt durch gefahren bin konnte ich kein Schild mit Namen entdecken. Steht irgendwo eines? Wird der Name von irgendeiner offiziellen Stelle verwendet? Meines Wissens nicht, das hatte ich auch bereits im Kommentar zu Change 92194400 und 95951637 geschrieben. Ich habe ein paar Einwohner von Klingenberg gefragt, in deren Bekanntenkreis nennt das niemand "Wika-Kreisel". Vermutlich hast du also nicht "alle Leute hier" gefragt, und insofern würde ich es noch nicht einmal als loc_name eintragen. Zwecks Unterscheidung kannst du ja sagen "Der namenlose Kreisel auf Höhe der Firma WIKA". Falls du also keine weiteren Argumente hast entferne den Namen bitte schnellstens wieder.

Danke, Jochen
ma-rt-in (2021-02-14 13:27:37+00:00): Hallo Ebenich,

hiermit lade ich die rechtherzlichst ins Forum ein für eine Diskussion um diesen Kreisel. Hier der Link: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818847

vg
JochenB (2021-02-17 22:15:35+00:00): Ich denke loc_name ist der richtige Platz, denn es klingt nicht nach einem Namen im Straßenkataster sondern einem im Volksmund (mehr oder weniger) gebräuchlichen Namen. 

Über das "mehr oder weniger" kann man sich zwar streiten, muss man aber nicht. Hatt ich im Forum auch schon geschrieben.
JochenOSM (2021-01-17 13:59:20+00:00): Hallo Ebenich,
warum hast du "destination:backward" in "destination" geändert? War aus meiner Sicht vorher richtig, denn wenn man Richtung Süden fährt geht es ja nicht nach Wörth?
PS: Wenn du name="Landstraße" setzt (Change 96624584) solltest du "noname=yes" entfernen.
Andreas Binder (2021-02-20 18:49:49+00:00): Hallo Ebenich, bitte korrigiere Deinen falschen destination-Tag oder melde Dich hier in dieser Diskussion. Es ist nicht gut, wenn Du solche Kommunikationsversuche/Meldungen in OSM einfach ignorierst. Grüße Andreas
DUGA (2021-03-11 01:45:17+00:00): It makes 0 sense to separate the lane. I'm going to undo the change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889917193
ElliottPlack (2021-03-15 04:19:46+00:00): Agreed here. The way should not be separated unless there is physical separation.
Frans S (2020-12-30 11:54:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here,
About your mappings. In general your mappings are rather accurate but not squared. don't let nodes of buildings connect to other buildings or features.
A number of buildings crossed a highway
Please adjust the highway to the correct position rather than let the buildings cross a highway.(very serious error, GPS navigation cannot guide through buildings)
attached document might be of help to improve your mappings. Best regards and keep mapping 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Frans S (2021-01-02 11:19:21+00:00): Hello.  A remark
Please do not connect nodes of a building to other buildings or features and square each rectangular building with the Q key 
Best regards
Frans S (2020-12-31 12:52:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mapping are rather precise except for a few ones which were not squired either.
Please take a look to attached document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-01-02 11:20:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
Your mappings here are rather correct mapped. Only not squared.
Please read this document how to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:41:00+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625804
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:41:13+00:00): *delete
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:49:26+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96626130
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:49:47+00:00): *delete
osmviborg (2020-12-30 06:18:30+00:00): Er vandområdet opfyldt, eller er det en plan? Hvis det ikke er opfyldt endnu, så er det en fejl at flytte kystlinien, som du har gjort her.
osmviborg (2020-12-30 06:36:53+00:00): Det samme gør sig gældende ved Rødby. Her har du allerede indviet et ny havn. Ved du hvor langt man er kommet den dette byggeri?
osmviborg (2020-12-30 06:38:52+00:00): Har du et link til disse entreprenør data?
STV87 (2020-12-30 10:55:53+00:00): Ja jeg ved godt hvor langt man er kommet med byggeriet i Rødby - jeg er med i det..
Entreprenør data kan du få ved at kontakte entreprenøren.. :) 
God dag,
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-30 11:43:03+00:00): está errado, capital do país não é 5. um pouco mais de cuidado em suas edições.
krusefahrer (2022-04-25 13:40:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889928981/history is totally wrong.
kapazao (2021-10-13 08:47:01+00:00): Hola, los elementos que has puesto como tourism=information ¿qué son exactamente?
ielham (2021-10-13 12:58:47+00:00): Sirve para referenciar a esa zona de playa, no es ningún elemento "físico". ¿Puede que esa no sea la forma de mapearlo?
kapazao (2021-10-13 17:25:15+00:00): Si no existe ahí ningún elemento físico entonces no es correcto. La playa ya se referencia con la zona de playa poniendo ahí su nombre.
Entiendo que pueden eliminarse.
Un saludo.
Anton Khorev (2020-12-30 09:37:14+00:00): Hello. You together with Szymson are changing back and forth the landfill area and its name. Let's look at the name first.

Do you think that "Zakład Utylizacyjny" is a good name? Do you think that setting this name is "reverting vandalism"?

(automatyczne tłumaczenie)

Dzień dobry. Razem z Szymsonem zmieniacie teren składowiska i jego nazwę. Spójrzmy najpierw na nazwę.

Czy uważasz, że „Zakład Utylizacyjny” to dobra nazwa? Czy myślisz, że nadanie tej nazwy "wycofuję wandalizm"?

Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
InsertUser (2020-12-31 18:13:43+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please save more often, I doubt the footpaths actually stretch from Miami to Philadelphia.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-12-30 19:34:44+00:00): Oczyszczałem również ten obszar za dużo tego było.
Loshu (2025-09-07 14:06:44+00:00): Is the line through the houses on Aylesbury Avenue now superfluous?
ElliottPlack (2021-03-22 14:58:20+00:00): Hello there. Per your block by the DWG, please don't change these highway classifications without discussion with local mappers. We did a big review of Maryland roads' classification several years ago and they should not be changed unless there is substantative change to the road geometry since then. Post a message on the talk-us list with any proposed upgrades prior to editing: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Meanwhile, this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101513133#map=15/39.3446/-76.6351
20180911 (2021-01-22 17:39:12+00:00): Wieso hast du bei der Biogasanlage (way id 194740794) den Brennstoff von Biomasse auf Erdgas geändert? hast du dafür eine Quellenangabe?
Meintest du vielleicht generator:source=biogas?
kjon (2021-01-24 22:27:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe meine Ergänzungen rückgängig gemacht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 09:24:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889952615 - have you meant shop=honey ?
jfd553 (2023-04-17 13:48:32+00:00): Lol, right, Honey!
jfd553 (2023-04-17 13:49:31+00:00): Change done ;-)
mueschel (2020-12-30 13:28:38+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these keys? 
street_names
street_name

At least 'street_name' is already used in Finland to mark the cycleways/footways with the street they belong to.
felipeeugenio (2020-12-30 11:33:18+00:00): ALonso. El tag private en vías unclassified es muy extraño y no se justifica en este caso. los voy a pasar a track.
Por otro lado, el constante cambio de nombre que haces en los canales nos indica que los nombres o no son oficiales o los estás inventando. Te pedimos por favor realmente averiguar cómo se llaman o dejarlos tranquilos
Jarek 🚲 (2020-12-29 23:25:42+00:00): See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3193667 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76279772 for past examples
ovruni (2020-12-30 03:29:53+00:00): Hola, nuevamente he notado que agregado edificaciones con múltiples etiquetas de dirección, ni tampoco con los números de puertas, asimismo ha seguido utilizando la fuente como si fuese ingresada por un usuario de Kaart. Por este motivo he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-30 10:48:54+00:00): Hi! The value of the name tag should be in the local language. In this case it was already in Italian. It is not correct to place the English version in it. BR, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96629211
mapko (2020-12-30 11:33:01+00:00): Hi. Many languages do not have their own name tag. It is sensible to use English in a (universal) name tag. Certainly English is better understood than Slovak, Russian, Polish, Italian ;), German, Spanish... Sorry if I made a mistake. Thanks.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-30 11:47:54+00:00): Hi! All languages can have their  name tag. Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names Moreover the name tag is commonly used for the local language (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name). English names can be inserted in the name:en tag. BR, Andrea
mapko (2020-12-30 13:04:50+00:00): Hi. Thanks for pointing to the wiki. I understand that the name tag should be in the local language, but several E-routes pass through several countries and each country may prefered that the name should be in their language. Ideally, the name tag would be in English, and the national tags would be in the local language. 
There is a difference if we look at the name tag from the bottom (from any country) and from the top (the world). It would probably like to modify the rule for the name tag. Thank you.
Warin61 (2021-01-01 07:25:42+00:00): Hi,

Some more thoughts on this valley stuff. 

Possibly leave the natural=valley alone as the base of the valley and add a new feature for the valley area/extent/? That would them fit in with making the new feature a simple area without a center bit that I don't think gets used elsewhere in OSM? So natural=valley_area ?
Warin61 (2021-01-07 10:09:44+00:00): An alternative is to use a site relation - that does not confine to a simple area.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-30 21:06:29+00:00): Hi 케이1159,
These edits have raised a lot of warnings and don't really seem to make sense. What were you trying to add here?
pio2_122 (2020-12-30 15:31:49+00:00): Zbytnio się z tym pośpieszyłeś.
Jeszcze nie ma 1 stycznia 2021. Nie dodajemy zmian z wyprzedzeniem...
Fashaj (2020-12-31 16:39:01+00:00): Zanim to się pokaże na mapie, na warstwach obejmujących województwo, to będzie 1 stycznia i uwzględniając to opóźnienie dokonałem szybszej edycji, ale będę pamiętał na przyszłość.
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:09:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.

On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
DP24PH (2021-02-16 03:17:14+00:00): Unfortunately, certain way segments are not regularly used since all traffic needs to make a smooth right-turn to the huge roundabout interchange. You might need to consider avoiding the straight-thru way segments connecting to the roundabout (on a sharp 90-degree angle) to prevent further navigation and safety issues.
Okaylo (2021-02-17 21:27:04+00:00): Hello DP24PH,
Thank you for the message. I added the trunk and primary way segments because Maxar Premium Imagery and OpenStreetCam show evidence of them being used. I understand that those segments are not regularly used and smooth turn way segments are more favorable. How do you think these segments should be represented on the map?
Frans S (2021-01-02 14:25:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I reviewed your work.
About your mappings, Your mappings are rather accurate but  not squared.


On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
opendcc (2024-04-03 19:38:24+00:00): Hello, what is the definition of this postfix :2020?
yopaseopor (2024-04-03 21:05:19+00:00): This is one of the most important quarters of "cheap houses" in Barcelona. There were/There are little houses with garden (now, as a museum) https://www.barcelona.cat/museuhistoria/ca/patrimonis/els-espais-del-muhba/muhba-bon-pastor. As the info was inside OSM I have applied the life date space cycle prefix you can find in the wiki.
opendcc (2024-04-04 06:27:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix does only show prefixes, no postfixes. And a number like 2020 is mentioned nowhere. If these things were started in 2020, you may use the start_date-tag.
yopaseopor (2024-04-04 15:54:22+00:00): No,I have talked about other page. I have used https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_namespace_suffix_as_%22keyname:DATESPEC=...%22 Sorry.
opendcc (2024-04-04 16:59:47+00:00): Hello, still: this does not cover something like entrance:2020. The - sign is missing. This page only refers to proposal and compare them, I can't can't see votes/approvals.
yopaseopor (2024-04-04 20:03:51+00:00): I can't see any vote too in all of this . Please review it. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Key_descriptions_with_status_%22de_facto%22
Supaplex (2020-12-30 05:07:10+00:00): 為什麼移除名稱呢?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96630969
yellowsoar (2020-12-30 12:00:26+00:00): duplicate of landuse
user_5359 (2020-12-31 17:34:14+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/node/6041813165 and http://www.osm.org/way/332250890: Did you really mean, the the postfix :2020 is necessary? Okay ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But it But is it really necessary at all four corners of the house? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/11SJ
yopaseopor (2020-12-31 18:04:54+00:00): Hi! The postfix follows this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_namespace_suffix_as_.22keyname:DATESPEC.3D...22

There are not the four corners of the house, there are all the housenumbers of every house because this zone was well-imported from Spanish Cadastre and we had all the data. It was an entire historical  neighbourhood called "Les Cases Barates del Bon Pastor". It is coming to their end from to 2007 to now.

I have checked all the data and I think it is correct. There is no extra data
user_5359 (2021-01-01 07:59:28+00:00): Sorry, you're right, the entrances were so systematically arranged that I interpreted them as house corners. But the houses existed (according to your import) only in 2020 and not since 2007. According to the documentation you quoted, you forgot at least one minus sign. And whether it really makes sense from OSM's point of view to note entrances and addresses in addition to the houses.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
yopaseopor (2021-01-01 10:28:35+00:00): The import is not mine. It comes from Spanish Community importation of all the buildings of Spain from the Catastro, which is public domain and accepted.
Reading OSM historic data in other places you can find that the most extended possibility is which you are put only one year, the last year I know this element had the tags you can find.
You can see this system in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190295318 or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144660394
kapazao (2021-12-10 16:32:18+00:00): Buenas, revisando en Osmose tema de nodos huérfanos me he encontrado algunos como este (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8272561221) y eres el último que editó. No sé a qué se deben. ¿Podrías revisarlo?
Un saludo
yopaseopor (2021-12-10 19:31:52+00:00): Revisado. Se había quedado alguno huérfano al dibujar (voy con una pantalla táctil) . Gracias por el aviso
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-06-28 04:57:52+00:00): Olá  BJJr
Este objeto de corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/889968814) se sobrepõe a outros corpos d'água que foram criados anteriormente.

você consertaria isso? deixe-me saber se houver alguma atualização de dados. obrigada
vorpalblade (2021-01-03 23:22:56+00:00): Thank you for asking for a review.

Feedback:
* You duplicated Whitman Park. The pre-existing park area had some additional information. I removed your version.
* You changed some buildings from `building=commercial` to `building=yes`. `building=commercial` is more specific, and should be kept unless you know that the `building=commercial` is incorrect. I'll leave these for the next time I walk by them (I use StreetComplete on Android for this).
* You used Bing aerial imagery. Not necessarily an issue, but there is better aligned, newer, and clearer imagery in the area.

As an FYI, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite".

JOSM also has access to the 2019 and 2020 aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS" (it doesn't look like you have ever used JOSM though -- your current edit is in "iD").

Thank you for your contributions,
vorpalblade
Frans S (2020-12-31 14:53:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Warin61 (2021-01-01 07:20:01+00:00): HI,

multipolygons are for areas ... not un-closed ways. So Kanimbla Valley (12110843) is an error. 

For the moment I would map that part of the Coxes from top to bottom as the valley. 

Nortons Ck looks to be part of the Megalong Valley ...
radiotrefoil (2021-01-01 07:41:01+00:00): Thanks for your suggestions, yeah I added the multipolygon relations tentatively because I was planning on enclosing them in an area once we figure out what the watershed bounds are. I understand your point, but rather than removing the relation entirely, is there another relation type you suggest would be more appropriate? If not, I will just add the valley tags to that bit of the river as you suggest.

N.B. Nortons Creek is a part of Kanimbla valley going from the GNB description. https://proposals.gnb.nsw.gov.au/public/geonames/d41a70e6-2eae-4b1f-a198-045c47c52eff
Frans S (2020-12-30 12:03:11+00:00): Hello Bapico. We welcome you as a new mapper. 
About your mappings. Often accurate mapped .
Please read this document as well
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
DressyPear4 (2020-12-31 12:06:04+00:00): Olá, para adicionar elementos no mapa é necessário especificar a tag correta, voce pode aprender em 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU2em8lBfd4
Nomes também, não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96632372
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-02-09 00:54:26+00:00): Gustavo, a seguinte linha: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815542511 é area de floresta ou trilha? voce deixou como os dois. retirei o de floresta, mas posso estar enganado, por favor verificar.
nmombo12 (2021-03-16 15:39:04+00:00): Resolved overlapping buildings with jagged edges in changeset 101130680
kylor (2020-12-30 22:20:47+00:00): Please don’t make an edit this big, only edit in one area, per save
lectrician1 (2021-03-09 20:56:09+00:00): Why do you feel it is a motorway? It is simply a U.S. highway which are usually classified as trunks.
sannkc (2022-03-24 00:20:51+00:00): My guess is because Fluffy89502 saw grade separated interchanges and used that as the sole criteria for determining that the road is a motorway, even though the speed limits, lane widths, lack of shoulders, etc. are all below motorway standards, as required by city ordinance. 

I'd be in favor of restoring the trunk classification, but, as you may know, the US community now prohibits such changes without prior discussion/consensus.  If you see/hear of any such discussion taking place, feel free to let me know.  I'll be happy to support making the change.
Priti25 (2020-12-30 04:05:59+00:00): Used Bing aerial imagery instead Maxar Premium Imagery
SomeoneElse (2021-01-06 08:59:38+00:00): Hello zacpac,
Your mapping seems to consist of random buildings with random 2-letter names.  It's not OK to do this - OpenStreetMap is a map of real places in the world, made be people who live in those places.
You're welcome to continue editing in OpenStreetMap, but only if you add things that actually exist and give them names that are actually valid.
Why not start in your own local area rather than overseas?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 19:32:47+00:00): Hi Arctic gnome,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177771210/history

you added this and some other places with double value (islet;island) around here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eyF

Can you check it out please?
mueschel (2020-12-31 09:40:04+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please be so kind and spend some time reading the introduction on how things are mapped in OSM.
Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

If you just add a name to some object, no software will be able to interpret this. There need to be tags that describe what the object actually is. The editor has a huge set of presets that you have to use.

Jan
Warin61 (2021-01-01 07:02:13+00:00): Hi,
the tag natural=valley should be on a way, not a relation.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvalley
radiotrefoil (2021-01-01 07:47:43+00:00): Hi, yeah that is usually certainly the case but I feel like this is still a grey area that the wiki hasn't encompassed well yet. Have you seen the discussion at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Dvalley#Valley_as_relation.3F
I'm happy to change the "multipolygon" part if you think that's necessary, at least until we make the area bound for the valley. I just can't really see the point of duplicating the way with the same geometry though.
Warin61 (2021-01-07 10:07:15+00:00): Try a site relation? 
I am ware of various 'valley' mapping and have made a suggestion to one mapper.
radiotrefoil (2021-01-07 10:22:10+00:00): Yeah that certainly seems like a better fit. I'll change this and the other one. Thanks