piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-03-07 23:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maro21 (2022-03-09 20:40:23+00:00): Skąd jest ta nazwa? Rejestr aptek podaje, że jest tu DOZ.
clay_c@wonder (2022-03-07 17:52:56+00:00): Oops—changeset comment should say "added maxheight"
Mordechai23 (2022-03-07 19:05:37+00:00): nie kojarzę by w tej szkole była apteka. tam nie ma lokali usługowych chyba
adammek54 (2022-03-07 20:57:06+00:00): Tak jest, mój błąd. Apteka, o której mowa jest w Ferio Gaj nieopodal. Usuwam
NieWnen (2022-03-25 21:35:38+00:00): Dlaczego zostały dodane "puste linie" proposed?

Jeśli masz wiedzę, co i kiedy tam powstanie, to warto te linie/obszar o to uzupełnić.
Same linie proposed lubią zostawać latami w OSMie i nie warto ich wrzucać, jeśli nie ma się pewności, że będzie się tam coś budować w bliskiej przyszłości.
Ew. osobiście bym zrobił wyjątek, przy nazwach ulic, ale też nie dla każdej możliwej.
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 06:53:48+00:00): Witaj. Dodaje drogę potem wpisuje zamiast drogi proposed nie można tak?
praeteritum (2023-06-29 05:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137902832.
praeteritum (2023-06-28 05:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137861176.
czubi (2022-03-10 15:57:22+00:00): Mal abgesehen davon welcher Name nun der richtige ist, bitte keine Abkürzungen (PSW) verwenden. Danke
praeteritum (2023-06-27 04:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137816132.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-07 23:31:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Jordi MF (2022-03-13 13:06:19+00:00): Hola Josepvc,
Per a etiquetar les masies, existeix una etiqueta: place=isolated_dwelling. Ací tens els criteris per a l'etiquetatge de poblacions espanyoles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N.C3.BAcleos_de_poblaci.C3.B3n

Salutacions,
Jordi
NieWnen (2022-03-08 11:45:11+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za edycję!

Domyślam się, że w tym miejscu powstają piwa, więc poza samą nazwą budynku, przydałby się jeszcze odpowiedni tag.

Na wiki można znaleźć jak to poprawnie otagować:
W tym przypadku prawdopodobnie craft=brewery

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:craft%3Dbrewery
OnwardTravel (2022-03-07 18:27:54+00:00): oops, i mean stamford
praeteritum (2023-06-26 04:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137772537.
Herman Lee (2022-03-08 06:41:46+00:00): 您好，道路请使用正确的等级，我会将此修改集退回
MxxCon (2022-03-08 06:52:57+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on the "addr:street:name=" tag? It's not documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118208566
JPF321 (2022-03-08 12:23:57+00:00): @mxxcon - I see.. I got that tag via the auto-complete pull down. I'll revise it later. Thanks.
praeteritum (2023-06-25 05:57:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137741382.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
user_8101879 (2022-03-08 17:17:32+00:00): Hi,
a lot of these relations are empty (no member) : do you know how to fix that ? (only 2 solutions = add at least one member or delete the relation)
Best regards
user_10901495 (2022-03-13 14:05:53+00:00): Nessuna rotonda? Ma che accipicchia dice?
Ha tratto questa conclusione guardando le immagini satellitari? Guardando lo street view di Google?
Probabilmente la prima perché Google almeno mostra che ci sono dei lavori in corso, quindi non avrebbe scritto "nemmeno in costruzione" ma lo sa che le immagini satellitari non sono in diretta giusto?
Non so di quanto tempo fa siano le immagini satellitari di Bing, ma potrebbero anche essere di 5 anni fa volendo! Non ci si può basare su questo per fare valutazioni su costruzioni nuove.
Le assicuro che la rotonda c'è (è stata costruita per permettere l'intersezione con la nuova variante della Varesina attualmente ancora in costruzione) e giusto circa 1 mese fa  è stata aperta, quindi il traffico sulla via Arese percorre la rotonda, che per il momento avevo appunto taggato come unclassified dato che ancora non è aperta la strada nuova.
Perché modifica cose sulla base di immagini che sanno tutti essere in ritardo rispetto al ritmo del mondo reale?
user_10901495 (2022-03-13 14:12:28+00:00): Annullato in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118430979
pianolente (2022-03-13 16:57:11+00:00): ci sono passato personalmente settimana scorsa e non c'era, domai ci ripasso e le mando una foto
pianolente (2022-03-13 17:01:16+00:00): aggiungo che secondo me è inutile disegnare le fionde delle rotonde così piccole, si dovrebbero disegnare solo se sono distanziate in modo apprezzabile (rotonde di circonferenza importante)
user_10901495 (2022-03-13 18:05:42+00:00): Non so cosa dire, effettivamente hanno ripristinato il traffico alla situazione precedente. Probabilmente qualcuno si è lamentato di dover fare una rotonda per niente (dato che come scritto in precedenza la nuova variante non l'hanno ancora aperta) e quindi hanno deciso di rimetterla in stand-by. Non ero aggiornato su questo, errore mio, ma le assicuro che prima era così come avevo mappato. Se passa lo stesso da qui domani può verificare che la rotonda è dietro le transenne (già finita se non fosse per il fatto che l'hanno spaccata per riportare la via Arese alla situazione precedente.
pianolente (2022-03-13 18:39:44+00:00): si vedeva qualcosa ma è come se avessero smantellato tutto ed anche la nuova strada non era asfaltata, forse la rotonda era provvisoria per il cantiere poi faranno quella definitiva, comunque ogni tanto ci passo e verifico
JAAS (2022-03-10 00:17:36+00:00): Thank you very much for your editing for the HOT in Guatemala.

With no intention of discouraging you from editing, I ask that you to be more careful and make buildings square, as they generally appear on-ground (though the resolution found sometimes the imagery may make them appear otherwise). In order to easily achieve this, after drawing in the building alway select it when completed, then by pressing the letter 'Q' on the keyboard. This will immediately transform it into a rectangular shape.

One more thing you must be very careful about is zooming in close enough as to avoid connecting the building nodes with the highway. This will always be flagged as an error and should be avoided.

I am leaving this building as is -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038057843/history#map=19/14.76263/-89.35309 -, recommending that you may fix it accordingly, and it would be better still if you check other nearby buildings you may have entered to check its rectangular shape.

Again, thank you for your contributions!

Sincerely,

 
JAAS 
Jorge Aguirre
Sridevi Godithi (2022-03-10 04:51:41+00:00): Thank you for the tips. I think I was not zooming enough to get good boundary of the buildings.
praeteritum (2023-06-24 23:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137737495.
maro21 (2022-03-09 20:46:17+00:00): Wycofałem
praeteritum (2023-06-23 05:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137672272.
pmfox (2023-01-09 22:33:41+00:00): Hello friend, I don't think your tagging these ways with 'bicycle=no' is correct or helpful. This tag is used where bicycles are not allowed. See the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_restrictions. Some of these ways are trails maintained by forest service for walking, biking, and horseback. More appropriate tags would describe the terrain of the trail, like width, tracktype, etc. would allow the adventuring cyclist to decide for himself if he wants to bike the trail. Thank you.
praeteritum (2023-06-22 12:05:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137644956.
Samuel Chávez (2022-03-08 19:13:56+00:00): Hola Mario AR, soy un mapper de Managua de OSM que ha visto que recientes cambios que has hecho han truncado varias rutas de transporte público de Matagalpa. Eres nuevo por el número de ediciones que tienes por lo que no deberías estar haciendo cambios a las vías y creando otras sin saber que es lo que haces y que consecuencias tienen tus ediciones. Antes de subir tus cambios al servidor debes de revisar que cosas has modificado. El problema puede ser que el editor que usas note muestra ésta información u omitistes este procedimiento.

No es recomendable editar o borrar objetos que están relacionados. Al completar tareas no significa necesariamente que las ediciones que hicistes no produzcan daños colaterales a otros objetos importantes creados por otros mappers.

Editar OSM no es tan fácil a como parece se debe de aprender mucho para no crear conflictos con otros elementos del mapa. Te recomiendo que sólo crees sólo puntos de interés de la ciudad que es importante.

Te adjunto los enlaces de los elementos que editaste y su ubicación en la herramienta OSM Inspector, que es una web de OSM para detectar fallos en los datos de la plataforma:

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55403598/history) 

(http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-85.92677&lat=12.91945&zoom=18&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes)

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038064120/history)

(http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-85.91297&lat=12.93868&zoom=17&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes)

Saludos.
maro21 (2022-03-09 21:01:58+00:00): Apteka już jest na dworcu we właściwym miejscu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993259019

Poza tym adres ulicy musi być taki sam, nie w skrócie
addr:street=marsz. Józefa Piłsudskiego
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 21:56:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118210149
maro21 (2022-03-09 21:03:02+00:00): Apteka już jest na mapie.
Herman Lee (2022-03-08 06:48:54+00:00): 您好，道路请使用正确的等级，我会将此修改集退回
kartonage (2022-03-09 09:22:11+00:00): Hej,
I have reverted this changeset because you randomly tag other objects as building="Residential building" including landuse and highways.
That's very poor mapping. Please be more careful.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118210448
Lee Carré (2022-03-08 00:32:03+00:00): Now this is a much better changeset scope.
eggie (2022-03-08 09:45:59+00:00): Dag vvad.. access=private zal in ieder geval regulier verkeer tegenhouden. Lijkt me dus oke. 
Gr eggie
praeteritum (2023-06-21 06:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137588140.
philippec (2022-03-08 20:46:11+00:00): :(
Er lijkt wel een huisnummer te zijn :
https://www.geopunt.be/kaart?viewer_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaps.geopunt.be%2Fresources%2Fapps%2FGeopunt-kaart_app%2Findex.html%3Fid%3D8ab21c5a7f0c58a1017f6b4447460399
bxl-forever (2022-03-08 20:59:45+00:00): Je hebt gelijk, ik heb het nu opgelost.
praeteritum (2023-06-21 06:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137588127.
praeteritum (2023-06-21 06:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137588119.
user_5359 (2022-03-15 08:36:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on my correction of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038072836/history. There was a lot useless words (copy & paste error)
Kai Johnson (2022-05-23 21:02:00+00:00): Hi! I'm looking at Cactus Valley Road (aka Old Borrego Valley Road) in the ABDSP maps and Cal Parks data and it looks like it's still open to the public from CA 78 in the south, at least until it reached the park boundary and crosses onto private property. Where did you see the No Trespassing signs? Were they at the north end near Borrego Springs Road?
archpdx (2022-03-11 01:08:08+00:00): Hi,
Please note that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM, see:
https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation

For example, 'Evington Ln' should be 'Evington Lane'
EZRouting (2022-03-16 13:59:03+00:00): Thanks archpdx! I just saw your comment! The error is fixed now!
archpdx (2022-03-16 15:43:03+00:00): Thanks for fixing this! However, this is just one of thousands of abbreviated road names you've mapped. I've created a MapRoulette challenge that contain all of these (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/26014) to make these easier to spot. I encourage you to help fix all of these.
EZRouting (2022-03-17 21:24:40+00:00): Hi archpdx! Yep! I realized it! The map roulette looks so cool! I just tried to make one change, please review it and let me know if anything needed to be adjusted. 


Expand abbreviated street name #maproulette https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/26014
CmdrThor (2022-03-09 01:09:57+00:00): Hey Mike, it is incorrect to draw road 'knuckles' (sometimes called 'eyebrows') as a loop of road unless there is an *actual* physical barrier creating that loop. The correct way is to add a short stub with a highway=turning_circle at the end, you can also add the turning_circle=knuckle tag to indicate that this feature is a road knuckle instead of a normal cul-de-sac. Thanks.  Please refer to the following wiki entries for further information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turning_circle
CmdrThor (2022-03-09 01:17:51+00:00): To explain a bit why this is important: if you draw the knuckles as loops your routing software may tell you to 'take the second left' and as a driver you might miss your turn because you were looking for a second street past the knuckle. Drawing them as a single way indicates to the driver that there's only one entrance to where you're turning. And as someone who relies on OSM data for their job, having correct accurate information is important to me personally.

Also worth mentioning that if you want to draw the actual shape of the knuckles, that's fine, but there's a dedicated area:highway=* tag for that that should be drawn separately from the main routable road network.
trial (2022-03-13 12:48:28+00:00): Bonjour ; 
addr:city		Ploemeur
addr:place		Beg Minio
addr:street		Route de Fort Bloqué
addr:postcode		56270
à éviter de préférence : Ploemeur N'est PAS le nom de la ville. Comme 56270 c'est au mieux redondant (porté la la géométrie de la commune).
addr:place		Beg Minio
addr:street		Route de Fort Bloqué
1) non c'est fromage ou dessert. Logiquement c'est addr:place=Beg Minio
2) (ou plutôt contact:place car ce n'est pas un point adresse, Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact#Mail_address)
JIDB (2022-03-13 21:04:08+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour les suggestions.

Pour le nom de la commune, je suppose que vous faites référence à l'orthographe "oe" ou "œ". Je n'avais en effet pas remarqué, mais j'ai repris l'orthographe utilisée par le camping lui-même. Je n'aurais rien contre si quelqu'un veux l'améliorer.

Pour ce qui n'est d'indiquer la commune et le code postal, le wiki suggère d'ajouter l'information si elle connue. C'est sans doute vrai qu'il est possible de le déduire de la géométrie, mais je n'ai pas assez creusé la question pour savoir ce qui est le mieux. Dans la pratique j'ai déjà vu les 2 solutions utilisées. Si l'usage est régional à tendance à suivre plutôt une des solutions, cela serait bien sûr une raison de la faire.

Quant à addr:place, le camping indiquant une rue et un lieu-dit, j'ai cherché un moyen d'indiquer les 2. addr:place n'est peut-être pas la meilleur solution, mais je n'ai pas trouvé mieux sur le moment. contact:place n'est pas documenté dans le wiki ou alors le lien n'est pas le bon lien, donc cela ne me paraît pas être une alternative. Mais s'il y a une meilleur solution je suis preneur.
trial (2022-03-13 21:14:21+00:00): Bonjour, oui Plœmeur s'écrit avec un œ (oe n'est qu'une tolérance, les panneaux indiquent bien œ). Et comme prévu Osmose râle : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=18&lat=47.736711&lon=-3.465229&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3

L'usage recommandé sur la liste talk OSM fr est de ne pas entrer d'information redondante et explicitement de ne pas mettre inutilement de addr:city et addr:postal_code qui alourdissent inutilement la base et qui deviennent vites fausses en cas de fusion. addr:full est l'alternative compatible avec l'existant. Et plus courant que contact:place : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Aplace (800 000 condre 57).
JIDB (2022-03-13 21:44:38+00:00): Le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr) n'est pas aussi strict, mais il indique en effet que le nom de la commune peut-être omis en France. Comme cela évite le problème de l'orthographe pas tout à fait correcte, j'ai fait la modif:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118446638

Je ne connaissais pas addr:full, merci pour l'info, mais cela ne me paraît pas adapté à ce cas. Le wiki, (même en version française) évoque aussi addr:hamlet. J'hésite parce que je ne l'ai jamais rencontré, mais cela pourrait être une alternative.
JIDB (2022-03-13 21:49:50+00:00): Un Node indique Beg Minio comme hamlet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6199205416

J'ai donc finalement transféré Beg Minio dans addr:hamlet (vu que c'est un node, là il n'est pas possible d'utiliser la géometrie pour le déduire). J'espère que c'est correct comme cela.
trial (2022-03-13 22:03:39+00:00): C'est un node mais rien n'empêche d'en faire une relation boundary avec place=hamlet. Exemple pas très loin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13328165, ça évite d'avoir des doublons sur la carte (c'est le noeud qui est affiché mais Nominatim gère bien la surface). Et moi je ne connaissais pas addr:hamlet.
trial (2022-03-14 12:16:58+00:00): Autant donner un exemple probant ;-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13328109
JIDB (2022-03-14 20:41:18+00:00): Peut-être mais cela devient trop compliqué à mon goût. Je veux bien croire que toutes les communes de France ont leurs limites dans la base et qu'il n'est donc pas nécessaire de vérifier systématiquement. Pour les hameaux j'image que c'est probablement encore peu courant.

Mais merci tout de même pour les remarques, cela a déjà permis d'améliorer 2-3 trucs.
trial (2022-03-14 21:15:21+00:00): Pour les communes c'est effectivement le cas. Pour les hameaux c'est bien plus rare, on est d'accord. De plus ça évolue en fonction du bâti, Cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13328165 : suite à un changement de culture (culture de maisons, ça ne se mange pas), le cadastre a déplacé le "centre" du hameau.
maro21 (2022-03-09 21:18:49+00:00): Apteka już jest w Pasażu, a adres to "plac Grunwaldzki", a nie "Grunwaldzki".
Tjuro_Global (2022-03-09 21:00:42+00:00): Hello Koreller,

I see you added some greenery/bushes with the landuse=shrubbery tag. should this maybe be natural=shrub instead?

natural=shrub is mostly used for unmaintained greenery/bushes and 
natural=shrubbery is used for actively maintained greenery/bushes

regards
Koreller (2022-03-09 22:10:13+00:00): I think I actually made a mistake. I don't use the shrubbery tag very much so I didn't pay attention.

Don't hesitate to convert to the right tag!
MadelNL (2023-03-04 08:07:06+00:00): Hoi Jesse,

Kennelijk is er iets misgegaan met het toevoegen vd de wijk HeerenPark. Zo lijken er huisnummers en zelfs adressen niet te kloppen.
Is het jou bekend dat BAG-import, normaal, via het forum gebeurd?
blef (2022-03-07 21:39:34+00:00): Bonjour Eric.
Attention, la BD Ortho IGN n'est plus à jour: par exemple, plus de panneau stop au bout de la rue Mandrina côté rue Alphonse Daudet.
Geim (2022-09-07 15:01:23+00:00): Hoi Flakkeëenaar,
Je had aardig wat wegen veranderd van residential naar livingstreet. Een livingstreet (woonerf in Nederland) heeft altijd een G5 bord: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden
Aangezien die hier niet staan volgens https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.744625430&lng=4.105523229&z=18 en Google Map heb ik er weer residentials van gemaakt.
Gr. Geim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
AgusQui (2022-03-19 18:00:46+00:00): Yo no lo puedo creer, cuantas veces te explicamos que se mapea segun la realidad, si no esta no se mapea, si esta en construccion se pone construction
MxxCon (2022-03-10 05:17:23+00:00): This is an incorrect change. You based your edit on Mapbox satellite imagery which is outdated since this intersection was significantly remodeled. Bing imagery is much newer and shows it mid-rebuild and Maxar, while pretty blurry shows its current state.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118212220
lovelyfurball88 (2022-03-10 20:23:21+00:00): I actually used bing imagery for this, I just compared it with Mapbox to see what it used to be.
IlliaHai (2022-03-08 07:16:23+00:00): What is the source of this?
Dinamik (2022-03-08 07:41:57+00:00): There is no one definite source. We have big data of open information: posts from sides of conflict, from local and international newspapers, from local and international newspapers, from local people who see dangerous situations by their own eyes. In case of precise information about some area we can mark area wider.
ququruzka (2022-03-08 12:53:52+00:00): please, delete this area . In fact, there are no facts to show this area as dangerous.
Otherwise, DWG could do this in any way.
Thanks.
ququruzka (2022-03-08 12:57:35+00:00): text in notes:=* is absolutely disgusting and irrelevant. 
 "it has no official status"
This area is a part of info war.