piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PFMLB (2021-03-21 15:44:40+00:00): Jep, erstmal bis ich dort wieder vorbei komme. Von der K96 war die Kreuzung gesperrt und ohne Kenntnisse ändere ich nichts weiteres.
hauke-stieler (2021-03-21 15:52:47+00:00): Ah ok, alles klar :)
habi (2022-01-31 15:12:26+00:00): Hallo SwissStalderS
Du hast hier (und in vielen anderen deiner Changesets) die genaue Adresse der Defibrillatoren in deren Beschreibung eingefügt.
Das macht aus meiner Sicht *keinen* Sinn, denn die Adressen in der Nähe sind ja schon erfasst.
Gruss,
habi
user_1566574 (2021-05-19 20:59:02+00:00): Bonsoir,
Concernant ce bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71904410, vous avez indiqué qu'il a "1 niveau". (Je me suis déjà fait avoir aussi) car un niveau ≠ un étage.
1 étage correspond à 2 niveaux.

S'il n'y a pas d'erreur, pas la peine de prendre ce commentaire en compte. Merci pour vos contributions ! ;)
frosm (2021-03-21 20:06:33+00:00): Bonjour,
si le chemin est restreint en accès privé, la barrière à l'entrée SE ne devrait-elle pas être aussi en access=private ? ou personne ne peux l'utiliser, pas même les résidents ?
darlaam (2021-03-23 06:41:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la judicieuse remarque, l'accès est possible pour les résidents.
topius (2021-03-20 16:35:09+00:00): I saw that you changed the Vanimo-Aitape Road from Secondary to Primary Road. That road is currently in such a bad shape that it does not make a lot of sense to classify it as a Primary Road. See the PNG National Road Strategy, that classifies this section as a "missing link": https://www.works.gov.pg/files/DoW_NRNS.pdf

And would it be possible for you to please write proper comments regarding your changes in the future?
geopard (2021-03-20 17:53:34+00:00): Dear topius, thank you very much for your comment! I changed the Vanimo-Aitape-Highway to 'primary' due to the rank of that road. The quality of the road is imho not so important (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary). Would you agree to leave the road as 'primary', but add a smoothness tag for that bad shaped parts?
geopard (2021-03-21 09:00:49+00:00): I added smoothness factors as well as some waterways. Maybe you like to re-check it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101430315#map=10/-3.0795/141.8876
topius (2021-03-21 12:48:44+00:00): Looks good, although I thought some smoothness factors are too generous, and corrected them. It is hard to tell from aerial pictures alone, though. Hopefully, someone might actually take that road and report on it (or the government finally fixes the whole stretch).
charl3s (2021-03-20 15:30:31+00:00): Cześć. Co poprawiassz? Bo widzę, że konflikty się porobiły
szalona_entropia (2021-03-20 15:59:48+00:00): Chyba się udało już je rozwiązać? Poprawiam geometrię i znaczniki na S17
aweech (2021-03-20 17:30:54+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your contributions. I'm reviewing your edits as you requested, but I'm unsure about connecting the New Boston Rail Trail to Mast Road like this. Last time I went by there (which was a while ago so things might have changed), the rail trail ended at a grassy area, and there was a barrier on the edge of Mast Road. Has this barrier been removed and the grass cut back then? Or do people have to walk through the grass and go around the barrier?
!bm (2021-03-20 16:15:19+00:00): Stefan, wie machst du das bloß – überall unterwegs, und dann auch noch der Zeit voraus. ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101391837
StefanHRT (2021-03-20 16:34:24+00:00): ups, jetzt wo Du es schreibst...da waren die Finger wohl zu dick um die 0 zu treffen (Bilder sind natürlich von heute)
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-22 16:57:17+00:00): Hi, it would be great if you could keep these changesets a bit smaller :)
Alex_Mapper (2021-03-20 15:47:03+00:00): Oops, forgot to add changeset description:

Imported door numbers from INE dataset (source=INE)
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-20 18:40:05+00:00): Ciao,
    Non è corretto mettere gli stessi tag su un'area e su un nodo all'interno della stessa. Se c'è già l'area, il nodo deve essere eliminato. Altrimenti significa che ci sono due differenti power=substation.

Inoltre, dovresti scrivere dei commenti utili a chi guarda le tue modifiche. Scrivere "aggiunta" su tutti i tuoi changeset è molto poco significativo. 

Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101392936
IlBano (2021-03-25 11:17:00+00:00): Ciao retlawb,

sono diversi mesi che alcuni tuoi changeset vengono commentati essenzialmente per due problemi:

1 - i commenti al changeset non descrivono le modifiche apportate. Non va scritto un tema, ma neanche una parola singola come "aggiunta" è appropriata perchè gli altri mapper, a prescindere dall'entità delle modifiche apportate, non hanno modo di capire cosa è stato fatto senza interpretarlo dalle modifiche stesse

2 - cabine elettriche doppie: se mappi una power=substation su un nodo dentro ad un building con power=substation stai inserendo due cabine. In questo modo riempi la mappa di informazioni "false". C'è qualcosa che vuoi rappresentare che, per quanto ne sai, può essere ottenuto solo con questo modalità (errata) di mapping ? faccelo sapere che magari riusciamo a darti una mano.

Mi permetto di ricordarti che astenersi dal rispondere a queste sollecitazioni da parte di altri mappatori non è un'opzione perchè, nello spirito che distingue OSM, il confronto fra mapper è un principio fondamentale.

Aspettiamo presto tue notizie. Puoi scrivere un commento qui, oppure, se qualcosa non ti torna, aprire un thread nella mailing list nazionale per estendere la discussione.

Grazie

Ciao
IlBano
retlawb (2021-05-22 16:43:06+00:00): Ciao IlBano
personalmente preferirei mettere il nodo power=substation in quanto si nota di più del building power=substation ( su questa devi andareci su con il mouse per interrogarlo).
Ipotizzavo di mettere come area edificio-tecnico e dentro segnare come punto power=substation.
E' corretto ?
Grazie 
retlawb
IlBano (2021-05-23 13:28:36+00:00): Ciao retlawb.

La prassi vorrebbe che i tag della cabina siano sulla stessa way che rappresenta l'edificio se questo ha dimensioni tali da essere rappresentabile (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Come_mappare).

Con "si nota di più" immagino che ti referisca al fatto che, quando fai editing usando iD, un nodo power=substation ti appare con il suo indicatore ben visibile mentre se messo su un poligono no.
A tal proposito considera che in OSM il rendering delle informazioni (su una mappa, un'app, un editor) non deve influenzare il modo in cui mappiamo altrimenti possiamo introdurre delle "storture" nei dati.

Visto che mappi già da un po' ti proporrei di valutare l'editor JOSM che, pur essendo meno immediato da apprendere di iD (questo può aiutare -> https://learnosm.org/it/josm), permette una flessibilità nella visualizzazione dei dati molto maggiore e completamente personalizzabile proprio per venire incontro alle esigenze di mappatura come la tua. Questo https://ibb.co/SnpghsT è un esempio di quello che puoi fare con gli stili personalizzati per evidenziare con una icona gli edifici che hanno un tag power=substation.
Se hai bisogno di altre informazioni scrivimi pure in privato via OSM.

Ciao

IlBano
Fabian Hevessy (2021-03-20 16:04:55+00:00): Correction: My edits were actually around Ganna.
pra_veen (2021-04-01 06:43:44+00:00): HI mapper,
Removed highway= crossing tags.Any of the image is not supporting marked zebra crossing and  its just a bridge with elevated structure.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102097911. Kindly check with the link.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101393183
pra_veen (2021-04-01 06:43:50+00:00): Hi mapper,
found incorrect highway classification of way 822301745 and later fixed by the user
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/shymy95
with corrected changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101795395
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101393183
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-04-05 07:46:32+00:00): نرجوا منكم التحرير وإضافة الأماكن بشكل صحيح وعدم إضافة أماكن بشكل غير صحيح وعشوائي
فهد العصيمي (2021-04-05 07:54:58+00:00): هلا
Super-Map (2021-03-20 16:22:03+00:00): Hi Courcouronnes, the better way is to use the tague "fixme" and your comment...
Courcouronnes (2021-03-20 16:27:19+00:00): @Super-Map I'll add that immediately! ^^ Sorry
Geim (2026-01-29 15:37:47+00:00): Je hebt hier (een lange tijd geleden) een extreem lange culvert ingevoerd. Is dat correct?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919750170/history#map=17/51.636931/5.797248&layers=N
jsmitsodiliapeel (2026-01-31 06:58:07+00:00): Dat is dan een fout, moet zijn ditch
Geim (2026-01-31 07:45:50+00:00): Ik zie maar 1 sloot lopen: https://maps.app.goo.gl/Air9LMjC3ykwAFto8
jsmitsodiliapeel (2026-01-31 07:56:24+00:00): Klopt! Niets meer te zien.
Gewoon verwijderen dan.
opendcc (2021-03-21 16:03:25+00:00): Der Schlesierweg ist nicht mehr an die Goethestraße angebunden. Absicht?
Penelope (2021-03-21 17:49:07+00:00): Nein, war eigentlich keine Absicht.
Könnten sie es bitte wieder rückgängig machen.
Danke
opendcc (2021-03-21 18:03:09+00:00): erledigt
SekeRob (2021-03-20 18:51:33+00:00): Hello, you have to check each item before you commit. This change set has produced 12 warning. Each you click on each item you changed, then left top a yellow warning box appears explaining the potential issue.
Go slow, do small changes check check check before saving
ciao.
user_5359 (2021-03-20 20:23:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved three address node over 100 meters, please check the position.
https://www.osm.org/node/6350826703
https://www.osm.org/node/6350826716
https://www.osm.org/node/6350827238
jodd (2022-02-20 21:10:35+00:00): Hallo sokolgeo,
du hast den node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6346530990 von einem amenity=recycling in einen shop=charity geändert. Hattest du dafür einen bestimmten Grund oder war das vielleicht ein Versehen? Tatsächlich ist es ja ein Altkleidercontainer, der vorher meiner Meinung nach mit amenity=recycling; recycling_type=container; recycling:clothes=yes korrekt getaggt war.
VG jodd
sokolgeo (2022-02-21 05:39:21+00:00): Ja, recycling:clothes klingt richtich. Konnen sie bitte zuruck wechseln?
jodd (2022-02-21 17:23:31+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort! Habe die tags wieder zurückgeändert.
Rafael Rivera Rondon (2021-03-20 16:25:17+00:00): Basura... XD
bradrh (2022-01-13 22:05:02+00:00): Your edit on this is wrong.  There is no road here.  It is either construction, or abandoned.
Dardy (2021-06-06 19:41:38+00:00): Ciao ho percorso oggi il sentiero che dal borgo di Moncenisio porta alla Ferrera vecchia, dopo San Pancraziono l'hai indicato come MO / 585.
Cosa vuol dire MO? ho visto che il cartello posto a Moncenisio indica "sentiero dei Monaci".
Inoltre mi pare che la parte finale a Ferrera Vecchia sia molto imprecisa, ho impiegato diverso tempo a capire dove andare, complice anche il fatto che ormai lì l'erba è molto alta.
Il sentiero che hai aggiunto passa alla destra della casa (sempre venendo da sopra)?
In questo caso correggerei la way perchè l'errore è di parecchi metri.
Ti risulta inoltre che ci sia un passaggio agevole per il guado sul Cenischia prima di incrociare la Strada Reale? Io ad esempio non l'ho trovato
user_4667729 (2021-06-07 07:55:22+00:00): Ciao Dardy e grazie infinite del tuo messaggio, molto gradito.
La numerazione MO/585 la ho presa dalla mappa cartacea dei Fraternali e credo sia attendibile.
MO= sentiero dei MOnaci
La parte finale è decisamente imprecisa, infatti da San Pancrazio in poi, il sentiero originale è ancora parzialmente visibile racchiuso tra due muretti in pietra molto antichi ma completamente infestati di piante e rovi quindi impraticabile.
Per capire dove andare, comunque è molto semplice: basta scendere a valle tenendosi tra questi muretti a sinistra e il fiume CEniscia alla destra, non c'è nessun pericolo di sbagliare strada.
Arrivati a Ferrera Vecchia, che troveremo scendendo sulla nostra destra, all'ultima casa grossa che si incontra, si gira a destra e si scende sul torrente, qui il guado non esiste ma lo si inventa saltando da una pietra all'altra ponendo la debita attenzione. Comunque nessun guado agevole, porre attenzione specie in questo periodo di molta acqua di fusione. Grazie e se sei in zona, io ho battuto molti sentieri e possiamo coordinarci.
Dardy (2021-06-07 08:10:47+00:00): Ok chiaro, mi torna, in effetti da dietro la casa una traccia di sentiero si vede, purtroppo invece prima è tutto perso nell'erba, mi sono fatto guidare dalle ruote di qualche trattore passato recentemente. Il guado è stato difficoltoso perché c'era parecchia acqua, da qui la mia domanda. Sistemo la parte finale appena riesco (ho già aggiunto la casa che è un punto di riferimento fondamentale) dato che ho traccia GPS abbastanza precisa. Ho inoltre aggiunto il trail visibilità nella parte dopo San pancrazio ad horrible, per avvisare che il passaggio non è così agevole. Grazie per i chiarimenti
Dardy (2021-06-07 13:42:56+00:00): ho caricato il tracciato che ho fatto e sistemato la parte da San Pancrazio al bivio con la strada Reale
Jrachi (2021-09-25 18:35:13+00:00): Le carte Fraternali non sono una fonte dati, né attendibile né utilizzabile.
Il "Sentiero dei Monaci" è un itinerario di valenza regionale e non ha una sigla.
Inoltre il nome di un sentiero deve essere il nome del sentiero non il nome di un itinerario che comprende quel tratto di sentiero.

Ivo
user_5359 (2021-03-20 20:13:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-24 20:41:35+00:00): Hey Hiausirg,

At least two buildings seem to have been added with little or no adjustments to account for their actual geometry. They are both circular buildings, not anywhere near their current shape. As you should already know, this is considered poor quality mapping, which does not belong on OSM.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919717882/history
( in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101389279 )
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919754078/history
Do fix these, please. And, if possible, review other changesets where this issue may have occured.

Sidenote: This is an old changeset.

Regards,

Daniel
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-01 20:07:15+00:00): Reminder: this remains unfixed.

Maybe all this unreviewed building imports should be reverted?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-01 20:09:34+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919754988 also reviewed?
zluuzki (2022-12-03 09:16:47+00:00): reverted
SekeRob (2021-03-20 17:41:13+00:00): Hi your edit set has 2 problems:
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway	1
warnings:disconnected_way:highway	1
Please review and correct. If you don't know how, ask.
ciao
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-22 18:23:04+00:00): Hi there, it looks like you put a riverbank polygon on top of a river area polygon.  The US convention is to use natural=water+water=river for river areas, and also to make sure that adjacent river areas don't overlap.
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-22 18:25:45+00:00): Also, this relation was left in a broken state: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1328532
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-01 20:14:56+00:00): Please, review buildings in this changeset or consider reverting it

See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919757123
Lachgast (2021-03-20 23:19:00+00:00): Hoi  NLThijs48, naar aanleiding van je forumberichtje ben ik wat gaan neuzen in je bewerkingen.
Wat leuk dat je je met dit soort details bezig houdt! Dat zal voor 3D-kaarten handige informatie kunnen zijn.
Zet 'm op!
NLthijs48 (2021-03-20 23:26:52+00:00): Thanks :)

De F4map en OSM buildings kaarten van deze wijk zien er al mooi uit na al mijn wijzigingen, ik heb zoveel mogelijk info toegevoegd om te kijken wat deze kaarten er precies mee doen.
peppone84 (2021-03-20 17:35:05+00:00): Recycling container removed because there was none in sight.
Puxan (2021-03-20 19:00:56+00:00): Muy bien, no olvides escuadrar los edificios.    
Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101399072
uvi (2021-04-08 14:55:43+00:00): Hallo ulan_bator,
zum Eintrag hat "anonym" eine interessante Frage aufgeworfen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2612408). Kannst du das bitte klären und am besten, Abkürzungen vermeiden.
VG Uwe
Leo Slager (2021-03-20 23:45:47+00:00): Dag Sv8x,
Een zeer ingewikkelde situatie met meerdere multipolygonen. Er was maar 1 juiste mp en dat was het water met een eiland.
Meerdere mps bestonden uit slechts 1 lid. Die mps heb ik verwijderd. Het voetpad gesplitst aan beide zijden van het water zodat er een brug kan worden getagd. Met al die op elkaar gekleefde lijnen is het met de editor iD bijna niet te doen voor iemand met zo weinig ervaring.
Ik zou je willen adviseren om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Dan kun je makkelijk al die lijnen losmaken en veranderen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Sv8x (2021-03-21 17:07:49+00:00): Dank je Leo, het ziet er zo een stuk beter uit. Ik ga JOSM downloaden...
jb54osm (2021-03-23 12:08:13+00:00): Dag Sv8x, 

Ik zie ook nog een brug van een paar honderd meter tussen de Emmaus- en de Fortgens-school. Waarschijnlijk een gevolg van een sleepactie. Wil je daar nog even naar kijken?

Groetjes,
Jan
Leo Slager (2021-03-23 12:26:32+00:00): De brug is weer teruggelegd op zijn oorspronkelijke locatie.
Hier kun je ook nog even je changeset bekijken:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101402708
jb54osm (2021-03-23 12:41:06+00:00): Dank je Leo.
Kan ik dadelijk veilig door Voorschoten fietsen ;-)

Jan
Discostu36 (2021-03-25 20:22:41+00:00): Wie kommst du darauf, die Veloroute als highway=service zu taggen? Das ist doch keine Zufahrtstraße?
Omegatherion (2021-04-10 14:23:27+00:00): Es war falsch als Radweg getaggt. Lt Wiki sind für Fahrradstraßen unclassified, service und path zu wählen.
Path halte ich für eine 4 Meter breite Verkehrsfläche nicht für passend. Daher hatte ich service gewählt.
gscscnd (2021-03-21 08:09:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1831346528/history — jeżeli tutaj jest sygnalizacja świetlna, to powinno być traffic_signals, a nie marked.
m_p_13 (2021-03-21 11:27:09+00:00): Zmieniłem, sprawdź, czy jest dobrze.
gscscnd (2021-03-21 11:53:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101434949
ruboqif (2021-03-20 20:31:30+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pourquoi avoir réduit le nombre de lanes et supprimer "lanes:bus:forward" sur l'avenue des Belges à Aix ?
Il y a bien 3 voies ici et une voie bus et non 2 comme vous l'avez noté.
ruboqif (2021-03-28 17:32:25+00:00): Sans réponse de votre part, j'ai corrigé vos erreurs. Cordialement.
FraukeLeo (2025-03-12 06:41:14+00:00): Hallo mahau, dein Umbau der Kreuzung an der K 4169 wird gerade hier diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/merkwurdige-spurfuhrung-an-kreuzung/82404/10
Vielleicht willst du dich da einklinken.
maraf24 (2021-03-21 19:13:30+00:00): Proszę podać aktualne źródło wskazujące, że tu jest taki przysiółek.
Nater Kane (2026-06-22 21:01:48+00:00): Hey Elliott, It appears access on was set to "no" and the name Bojangles was removed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421516674 in this changeset... isolating the "Something's Gotta Give" trail. Do you have any insight to what became of any of this in the last few years? The way has been inconsequentially edited a few times since,
ElliottPlack (2026-06-22 22:47:47+00:00): Hi Nater, I don’t have any firsthand insight but I’ve asked for comment from FPVSP. Stay tuned.
Nater Kane (2026-06-23 00:40:19+00:00): I appreciate it. I know the nearby section of "Something's gotta give" that crosses into an adjacent plat needs assessment as to whether it can be tagged access=permissive or should remain private. the lingering bike=yes there is confusing regardless.
literan (2021-03-22 16:08:48+00:00): а зачем теги lit=yes	
surface=paving_stones поудаляли?
khtskv (2021-03-24 18:23:10+00:00): я удалил большую часть пешеходных дорожек и отрисовал их заново, скорее всего, вместе с ними удалились и данные теги. Сами теги я не убирал.
literan (2021-03-24 18:31:15+00:00): ну вот по-хорошему, надо не удалять линии, где люди трудились и расставляли теги, а уточнять. 

А то выглядит, как "я удалил всю деревню и заново отрисовал только дома, более точно, но адреску выкирнул".
khtskv (2021-03-24 18:50:51+00:00): Хорошо. Все теги уже вернул.
eggie (2021-03-20 18:53:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

feedback De accesstags bicycle, foot, motor_vehicle ed.zijn allemaal default en hoef je niet te taggen.
Is het wel openbare weg en niet highway=track met tracktype=grade1 ?  Dat is ook een asphaltweg.

MVG
eggie



MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-22 19:08:08+00:00): Not bad, but addr:street should be "Northwest 23rd Street".  Abbreviations are not used in street names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-22 19:09:31+00:00): Also you might want to take another look at that?  At least in the Bing, Esri and Mapbox imagery it looks like this location is a Conoco gas station forecourt, not a building where one would find a Mexican restaurant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139
user_10608625 (2021-03-24 15:43:10+00:00): Sure, I was on mobile and wanted to get it added and fix it later. The gas station is abandoned and a food truck has been permanently setup there for some time now. As far as I can tell, the gas station tags should be updated to amenity:disused?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-25 16:11:59+00:00): That sounds about right!
user_10608625 (2021-03-25 16:15:17+00:00): Ok. Based on what I found on the help forum, I think my edits are correct? Do you see any other issues? I'm new-ish at this so any help is appreciated
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101409139
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-25 16:25:03+00:00): For the landuse, I'd probably go "landuse=retail" and remove the name, since it's no longer a Conoco.
geo_roads (2021-03-23 20:25:53+00:00): Hi Soulive, I hope you are well. Could I ask why you changed this road to trunk? It does have 4 lanes, but I don’t think it has an important role in the area, it only carries traffic to an industrial area and not through the area. This is my interpretation of this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes.2Fways.3F. Let me know what you think.

Salut Soulive, j'espère que tu vas bien. Puis-je vous demander pourquoi vous avez changé cette route en tronc? Il a 4 voies, mais je ne pense pas qu’il ait un rôle important dans la région, il ne transporte que le trafic vers une zone industrielle et non à travers la zone. Voici mon interprétation de cette page: https: //wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes.2Fways.3F. Laissez-moi savoir ce que vous pensez.
crosstato (2021-03-20 22:35:33+00:00): Hi there! 

Apparently the name of Mole/Moe Hill is quite controversial, so I've kept the name as 'Moe Hill', but changed the alt_name to 'Mole Hill'.

Cheers!
Eberth (2021-03-22 15:22:19+00:00): Da Holzrückewege nach der Benutzung durch die Forstwirtschaft wieder zuwachsen, werden sie üblicherweise in Openstreetmap nicht erfasst. Sie sind nicht zur Benutzung durch Waldbesucher gedacht.
azakh-world (2021-04-04 21:19:24+00:00): Здравствуйте!
В чём был смысл менять тег railway=station на railway=stop на станциях метро вроде этой https://www.osm.org/node/296995573 ? После ваших правок новосибирское метро недосчиталось нескольких станций. Вот страница валидации: https://alexey-zakharenkov.github.io/subways/rapid/russia.html. Сами сможете исправить хотя бы внесённые вами ошибки?