piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Larry0ua (2016-09-29 09:50:29+00:00): Навіщо було створювати дублікат входу в печеру в тому місці, де її нема? Тут знаходиться будинок спелеологів, а сама печера вже багато років позначена на захід від цього місця
fkv (2021-10-25 02:25:58+00:00): If you don't know what needs to be fixed, you should either leave the fixmes alone or ask the mapper who set them. Some of these paths definitely need a check of the permissions.
andrzej_aa (2016-09-13 10:17:14+00:00): Z dokumentacji highway=road: „A road where the mapper is unable to ascertain the classification from the information available. This is intended as a temporary tag to mark a road until it has been properly surveyed. Once it has been surveyed, the classification should be updated to the appropriate value.” Proszę o wyjaśnienie tej zmiany.
James Derrick (2016-06-27 09:49:34+00:00): Hi Plastic Pig and welcome to the OSM community!

Does the postcode you have added to a short piece of estate road apply to the whole close of houses?

If not, can I suggest you remove the tag from the highway=residential and add to an individual point, exactly as you did later please?

(I didn't know that Gnome 3.2 included map editing - must upgrade my own kit!)
James Derrick (2016-08-07 10:11:47+00:00): As there has been no response, I will remove the erroneous tags.
James Derrick (2016-06-27 10:04:53+00:00): Hi Plastic Pig and welcome to the OSM community!

Does the postcode and housenumber you have added to an estate road apply to the whole street of houses?

If not, can I suggest you remove the tag from the highway=residential? Please drop a comment back if I can help.

Also, for a residential road, addr:street is usually the same as the name tag so often omitted. Can I suggest you look at changing to addr:place or addr:suburb for Eastfield Lea?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

The whole residential area (grey bit!) is tagged Eastfield, but could be split into the individual estates.

I've not tried the editing tools in gnome-maps, but it looks like you're finding your way quite well - good luck!
James Derrick (2016-08-07 10:13:33+00:00): As there has been no response, I will remove the erroneous tags.
Osm1980 (2016-09-29 09:50:30+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز خطوطی که رسم کردید اضافی است؟
اگر اضافیست چرا حذف نشده؟
nebulon42 (2016-07-03 10:51:37+00:00): You have removed landuse=forest from relation 4192605. Was this intentional? I have restored it for now.
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:48:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
Achoin (2016-06-26 15:22:25+00:00): Детский развивающий центр не может быть офисом правительственной организации. Это скорее частный детский сад или дом детского творчества. Исправил тип на дом творчества
mavl (2016-06-26 16:40:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. К сожалению, вы неправильно добавляете здания и другим участникам приходится исправлять добавленые вами данные.  
  
Вы используете редактор iD. Для добавления здания нужно выполнить следующие действия:  
1. Нажать вверху на кнопку "Полигон" и мышкой на карте добавить контур здания.  
2. Слева на панели щёлкнуть левой кнопкой мыши по пункту "Здания" и в открывшемся списке выбрать тип здания, например частный жилой дом.  
  
Сейчас вы не выполняете пункт 2 и ваши здания не распознаются как здания. Они обозначаются тегом area=yes (такая-то область).
Supaplex (2016-06-26 17:00:37+00:00): 重覆了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396410905
malenki (2016-06-27 14:27:15+00:00): Hallo Kululu, 

in diesem Changeset hast du den "Schloßplatz" nach "Schlossplatz" umbenannt.¹
Gibt es für die Schreibweise mit "ss" Bilder vor Ort?
Für Namen von Straßen und Plätzen gilt: Was nach alter Rechtschreibung (vor den Rechtschreibreformen) gewidmet wurde, behält diesen alten Namen, sofern er nicht per amtlichem Akt neu gewidmet wird.

Viele Grüße
malenki

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227361985/history
Kululu (2016-07-02 07:37:34+00:00): Hallo malenki,
ich bin noch einmal alle Schilder und Beschriftungen vor Ort durchgegangen, die ich irgendwo im Stadtgebiet finden konnte:
Ein einziges altes Straßenschild verwendet noch die "ß" Schreibweise. Für "ss" konnte ich hingegen 7, 8 unterschiedliche Nachweise finden. Sowohl die angrenzenden Häuser scheinen dies einheitlich als Anschrift zu verwenden, als auch die Stadt Emmendingen auf Richtungsangaben, Stadtplänen und Touristinfotafeln ("Schlossplatz: 500m rechts" o.ä.). 
Ich denke mal, vor allem aufgrund des letzten Punkts scheint mir hier "ss" korrekt zu sein, oder?

Beste Grüße,
Kululu
malenki (2016-07-02 07:53:35+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Recherche. Offenbar ist "ss" dann doch die richtige Schreibweise. 
Die Stadtverwaltung wird sich bestimmt freuen, wenn du ihnen den Ausreißer in der Beschilderung nennst. :)

Viele Grüße
malenki,
bei solchen Gelegenheiten immer wieder gern dies verlinkend:
https://malenki.ch/OSM/Bilder/dscRX018576_Reissigmuehle_small.jpg :)
BeKri (2016-10-04 14:20:15+00:00): Servus,
bis Du sicher, daß
tourism=Langwieder See ok ist ?
OSMOSE mekert das an
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/map/#zoom=13&lat=48.1983024&lon=11.4114406&item=3040&level=1
BushmanK (2016-07-06 02:40:16+00:00): Не надо переименовывать это обратно - "временный проезд" - не название проезда, вы нарушаете правила использования тегов.
Achoin (2016-06-26 15:27:05+00:00): Исправил на "суд". Для обозначения зданий суда в Maps.me есть специальный тип - Суд. Будьте внимательнее.
Achoin (2016-06-26 15:31:20+00:00): Удалил отметку "Студия Йоги" так как она была установлена на тротуар. Ставьте отметки не по текущему обозначенному местоположению, а в то место здания где она должна находиться.
saintam1 (2016-06-26 16:14:07+00:00): Привет,

Забелязах, че използвате Bing за очертаване на контурите на сградите. Но според GPS следи изображенията на Bing са с няколко метра неточни.

Съветвам Ви да иползвате изображенията на Mapbox (натистнете "b" в прозореца за редактиране). Тези изображения са и по-нови.
Supaplex (2016-06-26 12:50:19+00:00): 賀！
literan (2016-06-26 11:33:40+00:00): Клиника это не hospital! не путайте. Только стационар может носить такие теги. Исправляю.
literan (2016-06-26 11:34:35+00:00): и слово Клиника с кавычками лишнее. За это тег amenity=clinic отвечает
kayle (2016-07-04 05:26:15+00:00): Zdravím,
všimol som si že do name (názov) zvyknete dávať všeobecný názov a nie konkrétny. Nezvykne sa písať do name "nabíjacia stanica" alebo "ihrisko" či podobne, ale presný názov. Nakoľko to že to je nabíjacia stanica, alebo ihrisko hovorí tag ktorý ten objekt popisuje. Ak to nemá pomenovanie tak sa napíše.
Supaplex (2016-06-26 12:48:41+00:00): 如果不確定名字可留空
chihchun (2016-06-30 15:31:50+00:00): 已經回退。http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40395332
SimonPoole (2016-07-12 19:14:29+00:00): This changeset removes the Spanish territorial waters associated with Ceuta and Melilla. Do you have any documentation on this changes? Locals in Ceuta are not aware of any such changes.
migonso (2016-07-20 21:53:31+00:00): Estas aguas existían en OSM, alguien las borró, yo las recuperé y a los pocos días alguien las volvió a borrar...

Ceuta y Melilla tienen aguas territoriales según los convenios marítimos y el Estado Español, aunque Marruecos no quiera aceptarlo, como tampoco acepta la soberanía española de estas dos plazas.
VlIvYur (2016-07-29 10:18:52+00:00): А эти граффити проверялись на поверхности? У меня есть подозрение что большей части уже давно нет, учитывая что их рисовали несколько лет назад. Хью Хеффнера не нашёл
VlIvYur (2016-07-29 10:19:57+00:00): Ах, да, в имени не пишут Граффити (отдельного тега достаточно) и тем более #myhoodisgood - тег для автора тоже есть
Petrovi4_jr (2016-08-10 02:24:58+00:00): Не все были проверены. Если какие-то отсутствуют-смело удаляйте.
Учту Ваши замечания в будущем.
bdiscoe (2016-07-16 03:36:26+00:00): Hi there, many of the ways in this changeset are EXTREMELY overnoded.  When you upload, you need to check the data FIRST for this problem and solve it before uploading.  Otherwise it creates 26903 nodes in the OSM database, then someone has to come along afterwards and clean it up by deleting ~90% of the nodes.  This is really wasteful on the servers and also makes work for other.
bdiscoe (2016-07-16 03:45:46+00:00): Example: before: http://i.imgur.com/HuJTxvi.png
After: http://i.imgur.com/VDAa6uE.png

Notice how the nodes for the selected are reduced from 1832 to 241, without affecting the accuracy of the data at all.
opendcc (2016-06-26 13:28:41+00:00): Hallo,

das Mappen von Fußwegen an Siedlungsstraßen birgt seine Tücken. Siehe hierzu http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig  Insbesondere müßte unbedingt sidewalk dranhängen, sonst laufen router nicht korrekt.
ivanatora (2016-08-22 07:28:08+00:00): This changeset deletes lots of manually contributed data. Please revert it and carefully remove only necessary items.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:17:12+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 21:11:24+00:00): Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area.  The findings and the changes that will be made are described at 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy
EneaSuper (2016-06-27 17:45:25+00:00): Volevo aggiungere i due campi nomadi di Bolzaneto, che tag posso usare?
Essendo ancora presenti non voglio utilizzare quelle per la discarica, mi parrebbe discriminatorio xD
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:47:56+00:00): 位置怪怪的，是在路的那一邊呢？
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:48:09+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
highflyer74 (2016-06-28 06:32:45+00:00): Hello!

Could you check these nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4266204063 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4266198383? There seems to be something wrong with the tagging. 71-105=1-35 + 109-144=1-36 does not fit into the OSM tagging scheme.

Thank you!
toorboalex (2016-06-28 08:31:12+00:00): Hello! Thank you for attention to my mistakes. Number of apartments have been accidentally introduced not in the "Value", but in the name of the key (instead of addr: flats). Errors corrected.
highflyer74 (2016-06-28 08:49:27+00:00): No problem :-)
soale (2017-04-10 17:52:35+00:00): Hi,

I see you have mapped the National Highway 543. I'm looking for the source of information on this highway. I have searched (quite extensively) on the internet for this, and all I have come across is this OSM wiki page with a list of Indian National Highways: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:National_Highways_(new_numbering)

However, the problem with that list is the sources it lists for the information have no mention of NH543. I was wondering if you might be able to help me find a source.

Thanking you.

Sohail.
Heinz_V (2017-04-11 04:35:23+00:00): Hello Sohail  
you can find all officially defined NHs in the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:India:National_Highways_(statewise). 
 The last time MORTH listed all NHs was in august 2015. All Nhs which were defined from august 2015 up to now are listed in this talk-page and can be found by egazette as described in the page.

The NH543 was defined from MORTH in the document http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2016/170223.pdf

greetings

Heinz_V
soale (2017-04-11 05:43:17+00:00): Thank you Heinz_V,

This has been of great help. 

Found another source (in the India:National_Highways Talk page) that mentions the further extension of the highway in Maharashtra, terminating near Bramhapuri: http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2017/173465.pdf

Thank you very much for the information.

soale
user_5359 (2016-06-26 15:04:37+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Leider ist Du beim Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427388477 vergessen einzutragen, dass ein Weg ist. Am Luftbild kann ich wegen der Bäume nicht erkennen ob es eine Straße oder ein Fußweg ist.

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst: Melde Dich ruhig.
user_5359 (2016-06-26 16:56:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add comments to the name.
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-14 21:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40750009 where the changeset comment is: revert tourism=artwork additions of Matthew Landicho after no response was given in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40320950
gormur (2020-06-23 20:17:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427392272 Did you walk this? Was there a path? I haven't been there, but I can't see anything on orthophoto, and then there is https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2105019
Odiz (2020-06-24 15:49:52+00:00): Yes, I walked this(I think, has been a few years now). I believe the issue has more to do with this path being unofficial yet marked by paint by someone who is not permitted to do so(supposedly, I wouldn't know). To the best of my knowledge people are still allowed to walk there.
IIVQ (2022-08-10 08:46:24+00:00): Hello,

Regarding  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869182#p869182 (Dutch)

Any idea why you tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427393669 with trolley_wire=yes?
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-10-01 01:19:56+00:00): Hi Super-Map. I changed geometry of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/427394711) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
Supaplex (2016-06-27 05:50:21+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
sq7obj (2016-07-09 10:47:20+00:00): Przy okazji edycji krańcówki usunąłeś fragment drogi dla rowerów, wićka już poprawił.
Supaplex (2016-06-27 05:51:27+00:00): I think its already there, but not in the map data of Maps.Me

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4260027890
Findus23 (2016-06-27 06:14:15+00:00): Sicher, dass hier nichts schiefgegangen ist?
Findus23 (2016-06-27 06:14:34+00:00): (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=40301863)
species (2016-06-29 22:58:02+00:00): Mag das jetzt bitte wer reverten? Mein reverter-Plugin mag leider grad nicht.
Danke!
Findus23 (2016-06-30 17:51:32+00:00): Hm, bei mir hat es zuerst auch nicht funktiniert (JOSM Reverter Plugin). Aber als ich Overpass in den Einstellungen deaktiviert have, lief es problemlos durch.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40398579
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 11:22:45+00:00): Welkom Grieko!
Kun je aangeven wat je precies hebt toegevoegd aan de kaart?
Ik zie geen verschil tussen jouw versie en de vorige.
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
grieko ten Cate (2016-06-27 20:33:11+00:00): Dag Marc,
OP de kaart zie je zandwinning. ten noorden , zuiden en zuidoost van de zandwinning heb ik een aantal punten toegevoegd. Alleen te zien bij ver inzoomen, zoals bij huisnummers.

Groeten Grieko
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 21:09:41+00:00): Aha, nu zie ik wat je hebt toegevoegd en wat je bedoeling is, maar het werkt niet op de manier zoals jij denkt. Niemand kan die paaltjes, als ze zó zijn getagd, vinden op de kaart. De name=* tag op zichzelf is een zinloze tag. Het is hetzelfde als met huisnummers: jouw huisnummer is NIET de naam van jouw huis, en daar krijgt een huisnummer de addr:housnumber tag. Zie bv. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2772294961
Op OSM moet een object altijd een omschrijving meekrijgen, en in jouw geval is dat:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:reference_point
Gebruik dat samen met name=brandperceel en het probleem is opgelost.
Lees ook deze discussie:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54920
Zorg jij zelf voor de aanpassingen?
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 21:26:27+00:00): Kleine correctie:
Laat name=* staan (maar dan met het reeds bestaande nummer) en voeg toe:
reference_point=yes
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 21:31:19+00:00): Ik heb jouw markering "name=10" als voorbeeld aangevuld zoals hierboven omschreven.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 21:38:59+00:00): En dit alternatief kun je ook nog bekijken:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point
Ik heb nr. 11 volgens deze methode getagd om te zien op welke wijze dat wordt gerenderd.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 21:52:28+00:00): En teleurstellend is natuurlijk dat dat voorlopig niet gerenderd lijkt te worden op de standaard kaart. Maar dan kun je altijd nog openpoimap gebruiken met de UserPois.
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-04 10:37:38+00:00): Warum trägst du ein Tankstellendach als Parkhaus ein? Ich lösche das falsche Parkhaus mal. Außerdem trägt man bei Parkhäusen nicht building=yes ein. building=yes ist ja unspezifiziert. Spezifiziert wäre es building=multi-storey, was aber schon über parking=multi-storey angegeben ist. Also daher kein building=yes. Steht auch nicht im Wiki, dass dabei building=yes angegeben wird.
user_5359 (2016-06-26 17:09:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the park is shown with the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139922858 . I don't think the tag leisure=park is correct. Or did you want to name the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188546197 ?

If you need help: You are welcome.
GinaroZ (2016-06-26 23:07:38+00:00): Why have you changed these roads from service to unclassified?
NorthBeric (2016-06-27 08:17:04+00:00): Because they look like industrial distributer roads, and to match OS Open Street View...
tyr_asd (2018-04-07 09:09:35+00:00): FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1348024
user_5359 (2016-06-26 17:22:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! We didn't paint the whole width of a street. One line is enough. I have done some changes on your work, please take a look.
Glen Bundrick (2016-06-26 20:56:11+00:00): OK New to this and learning
user_5359 (2016-06-26 21:37:40+00:00): No problem. If you need help, you are welcome!
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:37:08+00:00): Poprawiłem nazwę ulicy, bo była małymi literami.
highflyer74 (2016-06-28 07:43:36+00:00): Hallo!

Mir fiel gerade mal wieder einer Deiner Changesets ins Auge, weil Du Dich teilweise eines recht ungewöhnlichen Taggings bedienst. Ich hatte Dir auch schon einmal geschrieben, allerdings nie eine Antwort erhalten.

Warum taggst Du viele Dinge doppelt und dreifach? Dieser Gasthof hat offensichtlich ein Restaurant. Dieses ist bereits separat erfasst. Da ist es nicht notwendig, restaurant=yes an den Gasthof zu setzen. Gleiches gilt für den Parkplatz. Er ist bereits getaggt. Warum hängt am Gasthof ein parking=surface?

Es wäre schön, wenn Du Dich einmal äussern würdest...

Viele Grüße aus dem Norden!
highflyer74 (2016-06-28 07:47:04+00:00): Auch wäre es schön, wenn Deine Changeset Kommentare mehr als "Aktualisierung", "Korrektur" und "Ergänzung" enthalten würden... Sei mir nicht böse, aber einem User mit >40000 CS' sollte das eigentlich bekannt sein :-)
highflyer74 (2016-07-20 07:28:47+00:00): Auch nach 3 Wochen keine Antwort. Ich finde dieses Verhalten recht fragwürdig. Dann noch viel Spaß beim Ego-Mapping...
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:33:46+00:00): Jest ok, jeśli nie widać, trzeba poczekać lub odświeżyć przeglądarkę poprzez F5.
urzednik (2016-06-26 18:38:21+00:00): odswieżalem przed zgłoszeniem i nie zmienialo to statusu. teraz jest ok - widac po dodaniu trzeba jakis czas poczekac.
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:32:37+00:00): Na mapie jest tu plaża, anie lokal. Na pewno dobrze to nie jest oznaczone. Przypuszczam, że jakiś bar/kawiarnia tu powinna być dodana.
urzednik (2016-06-26 18:42:11+00:00): rzeczywiscie pomimo, ze jest w klimacie plazy rozsadniej bedzie jesli kategoria zostanie jako bar. tak tez zmienilem.
johantiden (2022-03-28 20:20:40+00:00): Parts of these paths can now be seen on Lidingö Orthophoto
johantiden (2022-03-28 20:21:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323160960/history
johantiden (2022-03-28 20:21:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323160961/history#map=16/59.3845/18.1277
vichada (2016-07-25 20:03:02+00:00): Hi Matthew,

 I've seen you mapped some buildings with additional tags like museum, post_office and so ...

Please can you elaborate these tagings a bit more, here. 
I mean, do you have additional informations about these buildings or something !? ... what is your source ...?
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:30:37+00:00): Nic podobnego. Nawierzchnię podajemy w tagu Nawierzchnia (surface). Tutaj zmieniłeś kategorię drogi z dojazdowej na polną/leśną. Teraz nic tam nie wjedzie przy normalnych ustawieniach nawigacji.
urzednik (2016-06-26 18:52:08+00:00): a jak mozna ustawic typ drogi na service ? patrzac na Twoje zmiany dokonane w moich zmianach.. musialbym wybrac droge wewnetrzna a to nieprawda..