piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2021-03-19 10:42:24+00:00): Wat bedoel je precies met "geen wandelweg"? Is hier geen pad zichtbaar, of is er wel een de facto pad dat niet gebruikt mag worden? In het laatste geval is de policy van OpenStreetMap dat het best behouden blijft als een niet-toegankelijke weg (zoals je elders correct met access=no hebt aangeduid).
DP24PH (2021-03-19 11:54:35+00:00): However, with the "motorway_link" tags, it may prevent the proper routing of certain vehicles (cars, motorcycles) into local roadways (M. Antonio), and it is usually hard to verify on-site for the duration of the General Community Quarantine in Valenzuela City.


DP24
Bert Araali (2021-03-25 12:08:38+00:00): Dear, please don't do this.  You realigned Victoria shores, village boundaries and thousands of features en mass.  It's not the mapped features that are wrong, they are all alligned correct with years of field work by the local community.  So please revert your changes or ask me to do so.  Never do this kind of mass edits without contacting the local community. Regards, Bert Araali
14239958 (2021-03-25 12:32:32+00:00): @Bert Araali thank you for letting me know. I had no idea and I’m sorry for the inconvenience. Please do revert the changes. I really appreciate the feedback and will keep it in mind going forward. 

Thank you.
user_10654882 (2021-03-19 10:32:28+00:00): Vidite kako se moze lijepo zajednicki raditi na mapiranju bez podizana tenzija, niste trebali ucrtati jer sam ja vec imao ispravo ucrtan trek al svakako HVALA
Sve Najljepse od Evolution Tima
user_10654882 (2021-03-19 10:47:22+00:00): Da dodam, nadam se da necete prisvojiti i ovu stazi i napisati da je vasa.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-19 10:49:32+00:00): Mi smo dodali stazu i dali smo joj ime MTB EVO, a ne MTB FORIS. Iako smo prošli biciklom ovom stazom, pokupili GPX i prvi ga dodali na Openstreatmap. Nismo Vas javno prozivali da ste u medijima dali lažnu izjavu kako ste dodali stazu na OSM. Mi ne radimo tako. Jeste li shvatili poentu?
user_10654882 (2021-03-19 11:22:59+00:00): OK, mi smo obmanuli menije ;) to i ptice sa grana znaju. hvala vam za update i naucite mapirati sa validnim podatcima gpx podatcima
Carnildo (2021-03-19 09:15:21+00:00): While making these changes, you orthogonalized a section of National Forest boundary.  I've reverted the change, but please be more careful in the future.
Montebest (2021-03-19 16:47:42+00:00): Thanks for doing that, sorry to cause a headache.
gscholz (2021-03-22 05:49:01+00:00): Hi mcnabbian,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.22690&lat=4.56941&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Guido
mcnabbian (2021-03-26 16:03:46+00:00): Hello Guido,

Sorry for the delay in the response. I have looked this over and it seems that the appropriate fix was made by 'Land-o Calrissian' in the following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101748095 . I hope this resolves the issue of the duplicate highways in the area. If there is anything else that you may need, please feel free to reach out.

Thanks,

mcnabbian
felipeeugenio (2022-05-28 16:31:26+00:00): Hola Alonso, varios de los parques que dibujaste simplemente no existen (todavía) por favor mapearlos como tal cuando estén listos y existan como realidad en terreno, que es como mapeamos en OSM.
Una duda: estás interesado en jugar algún juego o app con OSM? saludos
Владимир К (2022-12-28 21:21:05+00:00): откатил
jimmyhendrix (2021-03-19 08:30:18+00:00): Hallo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173965636
ich denke hier soll es historic=building statt "battlefield" sein oder?
Viele Grüße
waldhans (2021-03-19 15:02:22+00:00): Sehr aufmerksam! Danke, Josm default; battlefield vor building; habe ich behoben.
Mashin (2021-03-19 02:10:53+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM. 

However, I have to ask you:
1. Please do not delete existing objects. If they need updating, then edit their shape or tags.
2. Please don't create overlapping areas. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for how to map correctly.
3. Do not tag for <what ever software you are using>. If the area is marsh then leave it as march and don't change it to grass.
skquinn (2021-03-19 00:34:46+00:00): In the future could you please be a bit more descriptive in your changeset comments? "updated features" doesn't really say a whole lot. "Changed woods to construction; extended roads; updated name of park" etc is much more helpful.
skquinn (2021-05-04 09:40:42+00:00): Also, what exactly was being built at the corner of Will Clayton Parkway and Rustic Timbers Drive?
skquinn (2022-03-03 15:49:56+00:00): Now that I've gotten a chance to look at this a bit closer... why do parts of ways 918937429 and 918937430 overlap, when one is natural=wood and one is natural=scrub? An area can't be both.
danbjoseph (2021-11-05 12:52:07+00:00): Please make sure to trace individual buildings. You have traced random shapes over farmland and tagged as buildings. This is completely wrong.
seav (2021-03-26 17:06:42+00:00): I partially reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included TS Cruz's perimeter into the Las Piñas relation.
canfe (2021-03-19 18:34:00+00:00): street_side è un parametro e non un tag.
Non andare a "orecchio" consultare la wiki e ripristinare che andava bene com'era.
Togliere anche la relazione dei parcheggi vicino al memoriale FIDAS.
eggie (2021-03-19 06:32:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-19 06:55:07+00:00): BigStef Wanneer het de naam van het gebouw is mag het ook op de  gebouwpmtrek.
Dan rendert het op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Futur3r (2021-03-19 00:00:18+00:00): Salut,
Tu pourrais mettre les numéros de rues sur des nœuds dédié et positionné soit sur les 'plaques' dans la rue, soit sur les accès ?

Sinon c'est cool de faire de l'adressage :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101288217
jptolosa (2021-03-19 12:12:13+00:00): Hola alon1, la población mostrada en la página de la municipalidad, si bien cita al INE, corresponde a la población urbana total de la comuna y no a la de la ciudad de San Carlos, por eso lo revierto.
Es decir, colocaste la suma de la población de San Carlos y Villa Illinois (cerca de Chillán).
Saludos.
salve100 (2021-03-19 23:22:19+00:00): ya veo, muchas gracias.
jimmyhendrix (2021-03-19 08:29:20+00:00): Hallo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918947823
ich denke hier soll es historic=building statt "battlefield" sein oder?
Viele Grüße
waldhans (2021-03-19 15:02:51+00:00): Sehr aufmerksam! Danke, Josm default; battlefield vor building; habe ich behoben.
zalex_ua (2021-04-25 09:50:55+00:00): для чого лізти в місця і міняти їх, які нормально і коректно замаплені? 
для чого це? 
я відкочую ці ченджсети як непотрібні, які роблять тільки гірше !
Salmonleg (2021-04-28 16:56:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Accuracy

Якщо вона не пряма, то вона не пряма.
bkw777geo (2021-04-28 17:03:12+00:00): Привіт zalex_ua. Я редагував дороги, щоб відповідати новішим зображенням, Esri World Imagery. Наприклад, Esri World Imagery показує, що форма https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459892039 змінилася. Яке джерело ви використовуєте для внесення змін?
zalex_ua (2021-04-28 17:12:30+00:00): Джерело - кадастрову карту, де є межі ділянок. І  ще власні очі які цю дорогу бачать кожного дня. Рівність доріг згідно меж ділянок важливі, і це важливо так як вони використовується в інтегрованих сервісах. Я не розумію для чого лізти з "покращеннями" туди, де видно що все нормально і акуратно замаплено.
Сьогодні вона не зовсім пряма, як накатали грунтовку неправильно, а завтра буде пряма, бо виправлять в процесі асфальтування.

Я б радив зосередитись на внесенні відсутніх даних де потрібно, а не отаких "покращеннях" в невідомих автору місцях.
Salmonleg (2021-04-28 17:15:03+00:00): @ bkw777geo, FYI я відновив цей cs разом з іншими видаленими: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103791016

Геометрія була без змін з 2016 і тут виправлена коректно і співпадає з gps треками. Теж не бачу ніяких підстав тут видаляти.
Salmonleg (2021-04-28 17:16:44+00:00): Правка по кадастру, чи під красоту не міняє реальну геометрію.

Використання osm бази в інших сервісах – не причина вносити некоректні дані в базу. Імпортуй локальну версію тоді.
zalex_ua (2021-04-28 17:36:57+00:00): Мені піти зробити фотографії вирівняної вулиці ?
Вам нема чим більше зайнятись ніж цими "покращеннями" там де все і так добре ?
Salmonleg (2021-04-28 17:44:25+00:00): @zalex_ua
Так, звичайно, це хороша думка — свіжих знімків на mapillary.com по Гатному не вистачає. Вони всім будуть корисними, дякую за пропозицію.
tomczk (2021-03-18 23:05:40+00:00): Cześć, widziałem, że do kilku budynków dodałeś część tagów adresowych, ale bez numerów. Adresy dodawane są albo jako punkt albo do obrysu budynku. Jeżeli na budynku już jest jeden albo więcej punktów adresowych tak jak w tym przypadku to nie musisz dodawać do budynku miasta, ulicy i kodu pocztowego :)
zalex_ua (2021-04-25 09:50:49+00:00): для чого лізти в місця і міняти їх, які нормально і коректно замаплені? 
для чого це? 
я відкочую ці ченджсети як непотрібні, які роблять тільки гірше !
bkw777geo (2021-04-28 17:03:52+00:00): Привіт zalex_ua. Я редагував дороги, щоб відповідати новішим зображенням, Esri World Imagery.
syntex (2021-03-18 23:13:02+00:00): Nie do końca dobrze, bo dublujesz punkty adresowe. Adres powinien być jeden, albo jako punkt, albo przypisany do budynku. Nie w dwóch miejscach na raz
mariotomo (2021-03-20 18:43:00+00:00): hi amymack!  it's some guesswork we're doing here, don't you also think so? it would be nice if there were the possibility to receive GPS traces, and checks from the ground. please review my https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101411022 and let me know what you think of it.
amymack (2021-03-22 01:47:41+00:00): @mariotomo Agreed! It is difficult to differentiate between residential, track, etc. but I think your changes look good for now. Thanks! -Amy
JodaStephen (2021-03-20 22:07:22+00:00): Hi, I noticed you have been aligning roads to Bing imagery. Are you aware of the new Cadastral boundaries, and that they are now being used as the golden definition of location? I've setup a new offset at Wimbledon Chase of (3.95,-2.22) for our area, and just wanted to make sure you knew about it.
Stephen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101289025
adlid (2021-03-20 22:20:29+00:00): Hey, I've been aligning to an offset of 4.1, -1.7 within this end of London, so we aren't far off.

I wasn't aware of the new boundaries though, do you have a link to a reference? I got my offset above from a mix of GPS and landmarks, so another source would be useful.

Unfortunately iD doesn't nag people to check offsets like JOSM does, so everyone else still seems to be mapping to the uncorrected imagery :(
JodaStephen (2021-03-21 08:39:23+00:00): The official-ness isn't perfectly explained, but this is the best link I have http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/OSMUK-response-to-Accuracy-of-cadastral-parcel-alignment-td5986988.html and there is this tweet about iD editor https://twitter.com/osmuk/status/1368983036751187972 . My offset is setup in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database under "Cadastral at Wiimbledon Chase". (Cadastral data is not 100% perfect, but I checked a few locations around Wimbledon Chase to ensure my choice was OK, and I always switch the layer on for each edit session.)
adlid (2021-03-21 20:19:24+00:00): Wow that dataset is incredible, thanks for pointing it out.

Now if only I could convince everyone else to check offsets :/
abakus_uploader (2021-03-19 23:32:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
❤️‍🔥_import (2021-03-18 23:41:41+00:00): oops wrong account. Also "Ocean Beach" is a duplicate place, hence the huge changeset area
aweech (2021-03-19 13:51:04+00:00): Hi,
I see that you changed the operator on the Deerfield line from Eversource Energy to PSNH. Are you aware that the name PSNH was retired by Eversource years ago? If so, why did you change it to the old name?
seav (2021-03-26 17:05:51+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included the whole TS Cruz perimeter into BF Homes Almanza's relation.
DressyPear4 (2021-03-22 14:14:29+00:00): Olá, antes de mapear ciclovias, dê uma olhada aqui
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
Removi o que foi adicionado pois você adicionou de forma errada. Não ignore comentários de usuário que tentam lhe ajudar
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101290739
gscholz (2021-03-22 06:04:41+00:00): Hi Pedro,
your recent changesets have created several dozens of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.08419&lat=-22.51533&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Regarding cycleways close to streets there is a different set of rules about how to map them properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Can you please check if these rules apply to your case?
Guido
Arno1801 (2021-03-20 23:23:07+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous avez ajouté des panneaux d'arrêt pour toutes les routes à l'intersection du Chemin de Tourraine et du Boulevard Michael-Farraday. La dernière fois que je suis passé par là, il n'y avait pas d'arrêt sur le Chemin de Touraine. Est-ce qu'il s'agit d'une erreur ou un ajout prochain par le MTQ? Merci.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-03-21 11:40:43+00:00): C'est corrigé, désolé!
Arno1801 (2021-03-21 13:17:59+00:00): Merci, votre contribution à OpenStreetMap est très impressionnante. Vous êtes dans le top 3 canadien!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-03-21 13:24:24+00:00): On est en train de bâtir une équipe de codificateurs pour éventuellement compléter tout le Québec et ensuite conserver une équipe pour faire les mises à jour. Merci de surveiller qu'on ne fait pas d'erreur! Les utilisateurs dont le nom commence par ChaireMobilite sont de notre équipe. On travaille pour le compte de nos partenaires (villes, sociétés de transport, ministère des transports, etc.). La priorité actuelle est de compléter la rive-sud de Montréal pour nos besoins d'optimisation des réseaux d'EXO autour des futures gares du REM.
Supaplex (2024-01-06 04:06:07+00:00): 浮雲客棧已經有了，重覆加了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751456308/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101291035
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-04 23:21:48+00:00): Hello. What is your source for the separated lanes at way 542743944? I've passed by this road many times and there is no such separation. This can also clearly be seen on aerial imagery. and strava heatmaps.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-15 19:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104745748 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5028 .
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-21 18:03:35+00:00): thanks for your mapping, It is not clear why you delete multiple features in this changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101291293
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:09:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:10:14+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-19 03:46:49+00:00): Fixed another issue with splitting a road up, in #101294266. Please take more care, it made the road unroutable when heading North
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293070
osmowm87 (2021-03-21 10:49:44+00:00): Noted, thank you - I'll double check the one ways
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-21 10:56:15+00:00): They're easy to miss, would be an interesting problem to try and solve for a validator.
ralley (2021-03-19 07:13:08+00:00): Book store name should not be in all capitals
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293203
ralley (2021-03-24 20:04:58+00:00): Fixed
Dimacn (2021-03-19 05:45:01+00:00): Вы преднамеренно, несмотря на предыдущие замечания, добавляете несуществующие объекты в виде замков, меняете теги существующих точек, добавляете дубли. Подобные правки подпадают под вандализм. Ваша правка частично отменена и исправлена.
ralley (2021-03-19 07:10:56+00:00): There is no car park there - cars would have to drive over the shared path to access.  I run this route near daily.  It is also not in the aerial imagery you used as a source.  Please remove
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293397
ralley (2021-03-20 01:48:31+00:00): Removed
ralley (2021-03-24 06:00:58+00:00): This path does not exist, the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery for here is outdated.  Removing
skquinn (2021-03-19 03:19:35+00:00): Correction, note 2277660 (pasted wrong note number)
ralley (2021-03-19 07:16:46+00:00): As previously requested, please use more descriptive changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments; Most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101293662
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:10:44+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
❤️‍🔥 (2021-03-19 05:03:34+00:00): looks good :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101294136
BPTT (2023-06-16 17:59:29+00:00): Hi. Can you provide some more information/sources about these proposed route relations in Fitchburg (Nobel, Techlands, Fahey, etc.)? Are they official now? I ask because you tagged them as proposed 2yrs ago, and the "proposed" tag causes them to render kind of funky in CyclOSM and OCM.
Warin61 (2022-05-28 05:21:11+00:00): Hi,
According to https://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/Park/Footscray-Trugo-Club-Reserve
the pitch is open to the public.. ?
PolyDunami (2021-03-19 03:56:07+00:00): This changeset includes cleaning up a faulty edit by a newer user. This goes to show that paying attention to the beginner's tutorial can help big time.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-23 08:55:20+00:00): Please, use geoportal.gov.pl imagery in Poland.

Maxar is heavily outdated here.
PolyDunami (2021-03-19 04:01:16+00:00): That one was my fault, just a quick one-two and away we go.
Glassman (2021-03-19 20:05:25+00:00): Thanks for the updates. Do you know if that residential neighborhood is still under construction or are people living there now? The area was tagged as a construction area 9 months ago.
darnaut (2021-03-21 03:18:12+00:00): The community (called Wind Rose) along Southwest 97th Pl and 2nd Ave SW is no longer under construction.
fstrp (2021-03-24 01:20:06+00:00): Hola, segun la wiki, esos no son los tags para senderos MTB, ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
typebrook (2021-03-19 05:12:38+00:00): Corrupted commit, please ignore this changeset
typebrook (2021-03-19 05:12:27+00:00): Corrupted commit, please ignore this changeset
❤️‍🔥_import (2021-03-19 05:33:43+00:00): this one raised a lot of red flags because LINZ's data (v66) was very wrong at the time of the 2017 import. will investigate how to fix the remaining addresses that are a few metres off, or on the wrong side of the road
Kovoschiz (2021-03-19 05:52:14+00:00): Please be careful when you are straightening lines in iD. You would delete different individual sections of a crosswalk.
bplein (2023-11-04 02:50:51+00:00): This is incorrect. The building as marked is the Surf Dweller condominium. The Fairfield Inn and Suites is next door.
opendcc (2021-08-30 04:22:48+00:00): Anstelle hier den falsche Duplicate wegzulöschen, wäre es vermutlich besser gewesen, das komplett falsche Tagging in CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99548506 zu reverten.
Leo Slager (2021-03-20 11:24:33+00:00): De busbaan op het Baljuwplein is nu onderbroken. Ik neem aan dat dat niet de bedoeling was. De busbaan hersteld en de gebroken routerelaties weer in orde gemaakt.