piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2015-04-16 08:23:11+00:00): Hi, you have added lots of signals in this changeset and tagged them like German  signals (Hp, Vr, Sh at derails etc.). Are these really German signals like mounted in thousands in Germany or did you use these tags because did not have any better tags? ############################### 

It is not the right way :) to tag signals with a foreign tagging system. Could you please invent a tagging system for these area even if these signals look like the ones in Germany? I am doing a mechnical edit in Germany at the moment which adds the prefix "DE-ESO:" to a lot of values (ESO = Eisenbahn-Signalordnung). I do not want to use this prefix outside Germany. ################################## 
If you have no knowledge how the local railway company names these signals, you can tag them railway:signal:main=yes, railway:signal:distant=yes etc.

Btw, you can also write me in German.
Hydrantensucher (2014-12-30 21:50:59+00:00): Gebäude steht noch und der Name steht auch noch dort. Es wird nur nicht mehr genutzt. Deswegen hatte ich nur das shop= entfernt.
Kpt_Blaubaer (2014-12-30 22:13:10+00:00): Hallo,

kommt Anfang des Jahres ein neuer Laden rein, deswegen geloescht.
Kpt_Blaubaer (2014-12-30 22:15:55+00:00): Sry, sollte eigentlich nur der Name weg, nicht das Gebaeude.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 16:45:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1889529#map=17/45.87877/11.14082 is wrong

For example Rovri is not in the forest but it is in the valley.

landuse=forest and natural=valley are distinct objects
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 16:45:23+00:00): see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/429851
woodpeck (2014-12-30 20:36:48+00:00): Reverted in #27808967 by request of mapper
bihari-Chicago (2015-06-17 13:21:54+00:00): Heinz - I would like to understand the history of the Sone canal system. How do I get the length of the sone canal system?
trigpoint (2014-12-30 21:13:40+00:00): I think that should be Centre, center is american
Durko_freemap (2014-12-31 14:24:36+00:00): Zdravim marnav, odporucam Vam pouzivat pri zakreslovani editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/), vyhnete sa tym chybam, ktore teraz s iD editorom robite. Napr. tu ste teraz chodnik zakreslil na cestu, kedze ste cestu neprerusil su chodnik aj cesta na sebe (na mape to nevidite lebo sa tagy biju). JOSM by Vas na to upozornil. Mohol by som ten chodnik vymazat celkom jednoducho, ale to by nemalo pre Vase dalsie zakreslovanie ziadny zmysel. V inom sedeni ste zakresloval potok, bolo by vhodne pri krizovani s cestou pridat most, JOSM by Vas na krizovanie opet upozornil. Dakujem za opravu resp. doplnenie mapy.
StefanB (2014-12-31 09:36:06+00:00): Je to res vrh s tem imenom?
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-03-05 19:45:06+00:00): Czy tagi na www.openstreetmap.org/way/319642911 są potrzebne i poprawne? Czy nie powinny one być raczej na http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1984482 ?
kocio (2016-03-07 22:41:08+00:00): Oczywiście, poprawiłem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-03-08 06:35:06+00:00): Z tego co widzę to chyba po tej zmianie posypały się multipolygony (jeszcze bardziej niż do tej pory - np Hala Długa stała się zalesiona a niektóre tereny otwarte całkiem zniknęły - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/49.5438/20.1159 ).
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-03-08 07:44:44+00:00): A nie, to było spowodowane landuse=forest na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129585158

Chyba że jeszcze jest coś nie tak.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-03-08 07:44:56+00:00): I wielkie dzięki za poprawkę!
Tbobx (2014-12-30 23:31:16+00:00): disregard "from Alexandria City Government Map" comment.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-02 01:15:37+00:00): Dwie sprawy:
1. proszę dawać wyczerpujące opisy zmian
2. czy aby na pewno powinno być "Janka Krasicikiego". To, że ktoś popełnił literówkę, nie oznacza, że trzeba ją powielać. No i pytanie czy to na pewno jest ulica Krasickiego a nie Kraszewskiego? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3212329336
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-02 18:43:18+00:00): Nawiązując do maila: faktycznie, w iMPA jest obecnie Krasickiego, więc ok. Jednak pozostaje ciągle niepoprawiona literówka - "Krasicickiego".
Pozdrawiam
Skippern (2015-01-01 12:22:17+00:00): Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap, favor tenta coloque um comentário no seu contribuçoes para ajuda identificar o que voce tentando a fazer.
AgusQui (2015-01-01 21:29:38+00:00): Porqué borraste todas estas cosas?
Nakaner (2016-02-15 12:11:32+00:00): Hmmh, eine Nebenbahn mal mit, mal ohne LZB? Das muss bestimmt eine Versuchsstrecke sein. Aber tief im Osten ein Zugsicherungssystem des Klassenfeindes? *grübel* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54930905/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319655261/history http://www.openrailwaymap.org/canvas.php?lang=de&lat=51.734045297350825&lon=12.752552032470703&zoom=12&style=signals
rurseekatze (2016-02-16 20:28:40+00:00): Das soll natürlich railway:lzb=no heißen. Ich habe es in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37254403 korrigiert.
Raython (2014-12-31 06:31:25+00:00): Nombres de calles inexistentes.
Warin61 (2016-07-04 23:28:12+00:00): Hi
Way: 319666766 looks like sport=soccer to me rather than sport=soccer?
lubosb (2015-01-02 14:26:56+00:00): Hi,

it is great to add important information to map, such as new hotel.
But "note" tag is not the best place to add text favoring something. Instead, this tag should be used to inform other mapers in case there is some problem. Not tourists.

For this kind of information, you should use travel portals like tripadvisor, booking.com or wikivoyage.

So if you are OK with it, I will remove note tag with text "The best hotel in David...".
berndw (2014-12-31 11:24:12+00:00): Eigentlich ist das kein reines Schulgelände, u.a. wegen der Mehrzweckhalle und dem noch nicht erfassten Spielplatz, der ausserhalb der Schulzeit zugänglich ist
escada (2015-01-02 11:09:10+00:00): Beste,

hier is blijkbaar het een en ander misgelopen. Door het samenvoegen van de verschillende stukken weg, zijn er een aantal wandelroutes gebroken.

Ik neem aan dat dit grotendeels te wijten is aan editor die u niet waarschuwt dat er een relatie op de weg staat.

Aan de andere kant is het wel zo dat het samenvoegen van stukjes weg over het algemeen een zinloze operatie is.

Gelieve deze changeset terug te draaien of de situatie op een andere manier in zijn oorspronkelijke staat te herstellen.

alvast bedankt
Glenn Plas (2015-01-02 11:22:46+00:00): Kan altijd gebeuren natuurlijk, misschien is dit een opportuniteit om met JOSM aan de slag te gaan ipv met ID editor.    Zie  https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Als je hulp nodig hebt om dit terug te rollen of met de rest van de community te overleggen ben je steeds welkom op de talk-be mailing lijst.   

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Glenn Plas (2015-01-02 21:06:36+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset nu ongedaan gemaakt via changeset 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27873480
Lange_666 (2015-01-03 07:53:46+00:00): OK, voor zover ik weet niet direct gezien dat er wandelroutes onderbroken werden. Ik zal JOSM eens bekijken om dit probleem te vermijden.
escada (2015-01-03 10:36:41+00:00): Ik denk inderdaad dat als je er niet expliciet naar kijkt, iD je ook niet op de hoogte brengt van het verwijderen van stukken uit een relatie.

Aangezien je inderdaad nogal wat mapt, is JOSM waarschijnlijk wel een betere tool. Je kan dan ook gebruik maken van de AGIV luchtfoto's voor het beter aligneren van de fietspaden naast de waterwegen.
Bing is jammer genoeg op nogal wat plaatsen redelijk verschoven tov de werkelijkheid. Bij AGIV is dat veel minder.

Zoals Glenn al aanhaalde, kan je bij eventuele problemen met JOSM zeker terecht op de mailing list.
aceman444 (2018-10-28 20:38:25+00:00): Zdravim, tie "parkoviska" medzi Panonskou a Budatinskou nie su verejnymi parkoviskami, ale odstavnymi plochami, kde maju predajne aut vystavene vozidla. Chapem, ze zo snimok mozu vyzerat ako parkoviska (ale vsimnite si na ESRI tie pasky/lana ponad auta). Ako ich oznacime, aby to neboli parkoviska, ale niekto ich tam znovu nedokreslil?
Jose Riha (2018-10-28 21:30:24+00:00): dakujem za postreh. nebude to uplne najpresnejsie, ale nie je odstavna plocha tiez tak trochu i parkovisko? preto premyslam, ci nepridat access=private, aby bolo jasne, ze pre bezneho smrtelnika to nie je urcene. na wiki som ziaden tag specialne urceny pre takuto situaciu nenasiel.
aceman444 (2018-10-28 22:14:29+00:00): Dobre, moze byt. Este tam dokreslim ploty a mozno to bude zrejmejsie, ze je to uzavrete.
Este by sa to namiesto parkoviska dalo ohnut na landuse=depot (ci landuse=industrial+industrial=depot), ale veru takyto priklad ta tej wiki stranke nie je a velmi 'industrial' to v skutocnosti nie je.

Idem teda tu oblast vylepsit, dakujem.
Jose Riha (2018-10-28 22:19:23+00:00): ja dakujem!
rab (2015-01-05 19:54:22+00:00): Hallo,
du hast die L 318 hier zur Einbahnstraße gemacht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21260463/history
Da hier jetzt fast alle Straßen von dir mit Flächen verbunden worden sind, wird die Bearbeitung für zukünftige Mapper ein echter Krampf werden
jc86035 (2015-01-01 09:23:54+00:00): The Sheung Wan part of Des Voeux Road Central needs to be fixed up (preferably with a graphical editor) since the placement is quite off.
Wright One (2015-01-01 13:00:47+00:00): I created the new oneway path by referencing actual coordinates from Government map as the given aerial image looks a bit distorted

Coordinates of roads and buildings nearby have to be rectified soon
jc86035 (2015-01-01 13:14:58+00:00): Aren't government maps copyrighted?
Wright One (2015-01-01 13:57:07+00:00): just resembling my own survey results by comparison to improve accuracy (Government map doesn't provide locations of zebra crossings but I have)
angys (2019-12-14 15:34:05+00:00): Hello, can I know how you import Putrajaya boundary from Wikipedia?
katpatuka (2019-12-14 17:16:36+00:00): Using josm (java) editor I can add a picture layer (for Putrajaya https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Putrajaya_City_Precinct.svg ) which I than have to align against satellite imagery. In the case of Putrajaya I guess I used the lake to fit picture and sat imagery...

BTW: Penang seems to be well covered in Chinese - well done :D (see https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=zh#9/4.3943/101.9751 )
angys (2019-12-15 02:11:33+00:00): Thank you, as Penang has a large number of Chinese, it should be like this to attract more Mandarin-speaker to use OSM. (Luckily, OSM is not banned by wall and they can access directly). I would like to ask you a favor to input Perak district and mukim boundary from Wikipedia because a user at there just create a clear svg boundary for every district.
katpatuka (2019-12-15 05:37:29+00:00): hm - that seems to be a bit more difficult ;) 

Putrajaya is a small area but Perak is big while the wikipedia files seemingly aren't very detailed. If you or the Malaysian community know a legal source for "district shape files (.shp)"  it might be do-able...
angys (2019-12-15 05:46:23+00:00): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mukims_of_Perak_labelled.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_Kerian_District,_Perak.svg

I think this already detailed, for .shp I think there is no until now in Internet, but got many in png or jpg form (but now got svg form in Wikipedia)
katpatuka (2019-12-15 07:47:10+00:00): Well I gave it a try with Hulu Perak (https://osm.org/relation/10411526 ) but the file is really not detailed enough. It is easy if the boundary follows mountain ridges which applies for Hulu Perak so I've traced over the corresponding mountain ridges shown on opentopomap layer. But other boundaries may be fuzzy if they are NOT following mountain ridges, rivers or roads...
angys (2019-12-15 07:58:35+00:00): Thank you, just like what you say, it might be fuzzy. But luckily Perak`s district mostly connected to other state (except Perak Tengah and Hilir Perak). Vector map only can help in giving rough boundary, but not the very accurate one.Malaysia does not like Chinese Government have a good system about that. Anyway, district border are essential although it might vary from on the ground.
Raython (2014-12-31 21:02:26+00:00): Se agrego nombre de la calle principal.
4rch (2014-12-31 14:42:20+00:00): This changeset broke the boundary between Slovenia and Croatia again. Please inform yourself about the OpenStreetMap data model before you edit further boundaries. [1]

The iD Editor is no appropriate editor for editing boundaries as it hasn't an validator.

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type%3Dmultipolygon
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-28 20:41:53+00:00): How can drinking water be "yes;no"?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3079751000/history
Simon Davies (2014-12-31 11:12:54+00:00): No _right_ turn. Apologies.
Shoorick (2014-12-31 11:45:52+00:00): Можно обсудить на форуме: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=474825#p474825
jotpe (2016-02-08 07:34:40+00:00): Hier sind Adressinformationen verloren gegangen. Und die MP scheinen von dir später gelöscht worden zu sein. Kannst du das bitte wieder herstellen (vorher war es zumindest korrekt, wenn auch redundant)
wernerhxxx (2014-12-31 17:15:42+00:00): Die Arztpraxis ist im Haus daneben. Das große ist einen Wohnhaus, in dem eine Familie wohnt, die nichts mit dem Arzt am Hut hat. Beide laufen unter derselben Hausnummer: In der Au 2 und es ist EIN Haus.
Maxime Résibois (2015-01-05 09:37:14+00:00): Bien vu!
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-02 06:32:04+00:00): Führt das nördliche Ende von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319710916 wirklich auf den Mast der fetten 380-kV-Leitung?
AkuAnakTimur (2014-12-31 15:54:56+00:00): Thanks for adding the borders - I as one of the Malaysian mappers long enough for this (I am currently planning to send an official request letter to the Malaysian Department of Survey and Mapping to seek for some sort of official data).

By the way, may I know what is your reference? I'm guessing public domain data - due to your estimation, isn't it?
katpatuka (2015-01-01 12:07:01+00:00): You're welcome ;-) 

Recently I saw the news about flooding in Kelantan and Terengganu and noticed that some states were still missing... sources are large images from google search and wikipedia (which I used to roughly trace over with josm's piclayer plugin) and rivers (for example Sungai Kerian) where I duplicated the way.

Btw: would you give the Federal Territories the tag place=state?
AkuAnakTimur (2015-01-01 14:11:14+00:00): I see.

Two cents, I think I would do so, following another Commonwealth country's style. Refer to the Australian Capital Territory (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25842885) and the Australian Northern Territory (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/304951006). They both belong to the federal Australian government.
Dodko (2021-03-06 09:33:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65511632

Táto budova má adresu  https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=orto&z=19&c=17.106091,48.135407&it=point#/detail/adresne-body/0/18630605?zoom=false

Adresa Viedenská cesta 1 sa nachádza tu https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=orto&z=19&c=17.095506,48.131234&it=point#/detail/adresne-body/0/18630393?zoom=false
aceman444 (2021-03-06 12:47:46+00:00): Dakujem za info, zda sa mi, ze tak to mame, len treba teda dat prec 'note (duplicita vo fixme stale existuje). Vybavim.
Prosim doplnte teda tu Viedensku cestu 1 na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260679809, je tam len supisne cislo. Dakujem
Nakaner (2018-10-16 09:32:51+00:00): Hallo,

die GTFS-Daten stehen unter CC-BY. Hat OSM jemals eine Befreiung von der Namensnennung und den anderen inkompatiblen Bedingungen der CC-BY erhalten?

Viele Grüße

Michael
streckenkundler (2018-10-16 16:27:53+00:00): Hallo,

das geht auf diesen Forenbeitrag zurück:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19209

Speziell auf die Aussage im Beitrag: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=334525#p334525

Wie und wo das genau dokumentiert ist, könnte User viw sagen https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/viw 
Er ist aber seit drei Jahren nicht mehr aktiv?

Sven
streckenkundler (2018-10-16 16:46:18+00:00): Was auch noch mit eine Rolle spielen dürfte:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=367583#p367583

denn die Daten werden von Berlin veröffentlicht ( https://daten.berlin.de/kategorie/verkehr ). Vielleicht kann auch Joachil Kast (DD1GJ)  das noch präzisieren.

Sven
Durko_freemap (2015-01-01 21:53:43+00:00): Zdravim, ako vidim tvrdosijne si trvate na svojom napriek tomu ze stale tie mosty zakreslujete zle a to tak ze zakreslujete cestu na cestu, aspon nenicte pracu ostatnych. Vsetko po Vas poopravujem.
waldhans (2015-01-01 09:10:35+00:00): Warum hast du im Ninive/Viersen (z.b. Way: 174366615) die Adresseknoten gelöscht und die Adressen auf die Gebäude verschoben? Und dabei auch noch den falschen Straßennamen eingetragen?  "Alte Süchtelner Landstraße" ist falsch!!!
Sammelmuetze (2015-01-04 01:35:56+00:00): Hallo Waldhans,
Ich habe die Adressen in die Gebäude verschoben weil, dies so üblich ist, zumindest mir. Normalerweiese benutzt man die Adressierung die Du gemacht hast nur für POIs, also für Points of Intrerest. Die Strassennamen sind auch nicht falsch, da sie die richtigen ausgeschriebenen Strassennamen sind. Du hast nur abgekürzte Strassennamen benutzt. In OSM sollte man so weit es geht Abkürzungen vermeiden.
Ich hoffe Dir weitergeholfen zu haben.
Gruss
Stefan
rickmastfan67 (2014-12-31 16:59:00+00:00): I'm sorry, but I'm going to be reverting this changeset to properly tag this since we don't tag highways as 'highway=path' for when they are closed for construction.  That and also to restore the segments of highway to the CR 525 relation.  This has been fixed in Changeset 27827248. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27827248
Bernardsville Borough IT (2015-07-09 13:25:41+00:00): Thanks again for your help rickmastfan67. Can I ask for more? Changing this road to "Closed" has had unintended consequences: navigation devices are routing drivers through the residential streets nearby, bypassing the detours designated by the county. Some drivers never see the detour signs.
Bernardsville Borough IT (2015-07-09 13:27:55+00:00): Can you suggest an appropriate remedy? On my own, I might "open" the road so that drivers will see the detour signs. Or is it possible to designate some of the nearby residential streets "local access only" or "non-drivable-upon"?
Bernardsville Borough IT (2015-07-09 13:30:18+00:00): Lots of commercial drivers and first-time visitors are following their navigation devices through side streets, creating a safety hazard, and (justifiably) claiming they never knew about the construction and detour.
rickmastfan67 (2015-07-13 13:48:17+00:00): Only thing I can suggest is contacting Google.  Odds are, the people are using their Android phones and the Google Maps App and just follow what the app tells them to do (or they just use that as a defense).  If people want to use an app that uses the OSM data, they sometimes have to search it out on the app store.
rickmastfan67 (2015-07-13 13:50:04+00:00): As you can see in this example from Google Maps, they are intentionally routing people onto the side streets to bypass the closed segment. https://goo.gl/maps/yMziB  If you can convince Google not to do that, that might solve 95% of your problems, especially with the commercial drivers.
Bernardsville Borough IT (2015-07-13 14:38:54+00:00): Thank you! Just noticed that the area under construction did not show the full extent. Made the edit after your example. Thanks again.
jgpacker (2014-12-31 19:48:42+00:00): Looks like there was a bug in this changeset. It duplicated the elements it was going to revert. 
The previous changeset seems to have worked fine.
Oberpfälzer (2015-01-01 01:02:30+00:00): Thank you for your notice. I hope I have cleared the problem now. There was really a bug: it first uploaded the correct data and then the wrong ones again so I reverted the second upload competely. I have checked some of the POIs, which now should be office=software again, and they are correct again. Please tell me, if you still notice problems.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-13 03:49:59+00:00): Hi, TuanIfan. I modified the road (way 319730268) based on Maxar Premium Imagery because it's newer than the others imagery.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 12:07:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3261874753/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
escada (2015-01-02 10:37:29+00:00): Is het mogelijk dat de "bridge=yes" tag ontbreekt op dit nieuwe pad over het kanaal ?
Lange_666 (2015-01-03 07:54:42+00:00): Hierbij aangepast.
waldhans (2015-01-01 09:04:25+00:00): Du hast den name / official_name der "Alte Süchtelner Landstr." geändert (way 143614649).  Das ist falsch, der offizielle Name ist "Landstr.". Entweder wieder korrigieren oder teile mir deine Quelle mit!
smaprs (2014-12-31 20:08:24+00:00): Perdón, pero he visto y no puedo dejar de confirmar: sí es Marcelino Champagnat, el santo de los maristas. Mira en: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcelino_Champagnat
neluy1611 (2015-01-02 12:17:47+00:00): Lo volví a dejar como estaba (Campagnat), puede ser lo que dices sí, pero existe (con o sin error) Champagnan aunque googleando hay una foto a un monumento y el que saca la foto coloca mal el nombre (a menos que el monumento esté mal escrito y por eso el error), justo la parte que discutimos no se ve pero sí dice debajo "Fundador de los Ma...", Gracias
eggie (2017-03-20 19:44:16+00:00): beter laat dan nooit...
"Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
naoliv (2015-02-04 12:08:57+00:00): Werner, você está utilizando a tag "designation" nessas duas árvores mas esta tag é utilizada, basicamente, para definir a classificação de algumas estradas no Reino Unido. Ela não tem uso no Brasil.
Outra coisa é sobre o nome destas duas árvores. Acredito que o nome não seja "UFV_LEEP_BURITI_H002_290614_113200" mas sim uma referência ou código (portanto utilizado como "ref" ao invés de "name")
Você pode confirmar isso?
SomeoneElse (2016-06-12 22:08:26+00:00): Hi,
I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319762883 isn't all "hampshire gate"?
dudone (2016-06-13 18:22:21+00:00): Hi

Auto complete getting the better of me.  I have changed it to hedge.

Regards

Dudley
SomeoneElse (2016-06-13 22:08:05+00:00): Thanks.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-20 22:24:52+00:00): Panie Majster, ale obszarów do dróg proszę nie przyklejać.
emacsen (2014-12-31 20:43:18+00:00): Hey, I see this is one of your first edits! Congrats on joining OSM! Looking at one of the objects you've made, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319765525 - what is that? It looks like a plain area with no tags. Did you mean to add that?
pupmike (2015-01-01 14:59:34+00:00): no didnt mean to add it am still learning this will see if i can remove it
emacsen (2015-01-01 15:01:47+00:00): No problem. If you need help, let me know.

Also if you're local, you may want to join the local meetup: http://www.meetup.com/osm-nyc/
aceman444 (2019-10-06 13:48:20+00:00): Dobry den, funkcie budov sa nepisu len takto po slovensky do nazvu budovy, to nikomu nepomoze. Treba pozivat riadne znacky pre objekty podla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/, napr. hasicska stanica je amenity=fire_station, obecny urad je amenity=townhall. Potom tomu budu rozumiet aj cudzinci a hlavne aplikacie.
aceman444 (2019-10-06 20:25:18+00:00): Vsetko som to opravil.
mweper (2015-01-01 00:11:50+00:00): Por favor, cree correctamente la relación para el radar agregando toda la información conocida posible.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relation:enforcement
agarassino (2015-01-01 15:04:23+00:00): Hola, gracias por la ayuda. Te fijarías si quedo bien? Agregué la relación con 2 miebros, uno el radar y otro es el nodo con el tipo FROM que segun entendi podría ser donde está el cartel que alerta sobre el radar.