piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-07-25 10:10:41+00:00): Ha Mapgein,
Voor het kosmetisch effect heb ik die landuse weer even aangepast tot de baan en nog wat landuse toegevoegd.
De highway=pedestrian heb ik nog area=yes toegevoegd op de relatie.
Waarom het er op de Openfietsmap in basecamp en mapsource zo  uitziet als het er uitziet heb ik je per PB uitgelegd.
Dat heeft dus met de pixels te maken op een gpsr scherm.
Ook zul je zien dat door de residentalvlakken ook de landuse soms  wegvalt . Het is een keuze van de kaartenmaker. 
Op je gps apparaat  zelf zul je er geen last van hebben. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 10:21:51+00:00): Maar voel je vrij om die pedestrian weer weg te halen. Wel dan eerst al die relaties verwijderen. 
Maar het einde is zoek om het zo te gaan mappen dat het alleen op de OFM goed rendert.
Gr eggie
mueschel (2020-07-23 13:59:57+00:00): Hi,
you added many nodes with 'BIO=CHCK' tag - this is not used in other places.Could you explain what that means?

Thanks!
user_5359 (2020-07-22 18:04:18+00:00): Hello!  Please use contact:facebook instead contact:Facebook.

Bonjour !  Veuillez utiliser contact:facebook au lieu de contact:Facebook.
UMR_Passages (2020-07-24 06:38:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de votre alerte ! Avec JOSM je n'y avais pas prêté garde.
amgusha (2020-10-12 20:34:55+00:00): Официальные стоянки в этих местах отсутствуют, удаляю.
s-s-s (2020-10-13 13:46:11+00:00): Не нужно удалять, того, что вы не видели своими глазами. Там реально очень мало мест, где можно встать. 
Займитесь лучше делом.
amgusha (2020-10-13 15:27:28+00:00): Разрешённые стоянки - http://oksky-reserve.ru/visit/water/ Размещение в остальных местах является административным правонарушением.
Frans S (2020-07-24 15:07:06+00:00): Hello.
Please pay attention on precise mapping and squaring the buildings you map
Best regards
amgusha (2020-10-13 15:45:26+00:00): 828855815 - это кордон "Старый" Окского заповедника
eggie (2020-07-22 17:38:11+00:00): Dag Hans.. Houd je er svp rekening mee dat we bedrijfsinfo en adressen alleen op de adresnodes zetten en niet nogmaals op de gebouwomtrek zelf.
Dus niet dubbeltaggen. Graag de info weer verwijderen van het gebouw.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-22 17:39:55+00:00): Dag Hans .svp alleen info op de adresnodes.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-22 17:47:47+00:00): De building:parts hersteld. Die worden gebruikt om een gebouw in een gebouw te zetten. Dus de indeling. ....daar geen building=  van maken.
De info en adresinfo van het gebouw gehaald. De adresnodes met info zijn voldoende.
MVG,
eggie
christiank61 (2020-07-22 15:18:53+00:00): There are two ways as coastline: this one and another one below. This one is the older one, however it (and two short ones on the west) are not connected to the main coastline.
divulmappeur (2020-07-23 14:37:28+00:00): Pourquoi avoir crée une immense zone résidentielle nommée parc Lubonis ??
Super-Map (2020-07-24 08:12:39+00:00): It was a "mistake"; all are correct now, thanks for your "advise"...
maraf24 (2020-07-22 19:04:53+00:00): Poważny wandalizm.
Wycofane.
sorcrosc (2020-07-22 17:15:19+00:00): Non dovresti eitchettare rotatorie e tratti di ingresso e uscita da queste con tag di tipo _link. Questi elementi fanno parte delle strade principali. I _link si usano praticamente solo per i collegamenti con le strade veloci, principalmente autostrade e superstrade.

Controlla anche duplicati e sovrapposizioni qui. Cosa è successo ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/38.94850/16.78348

Grazie
Lorenzo
Frans S (2020-07-22 16:46:14+00:00): Hello Meagan 
Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Good work. 
Just a few remarks.
Most buildings are strict rectangular. Try to map them as such. When there are extensions, map them end square the building with the q key. 
Please do not connect buildings to eachother by their nodes,
Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right side menu and solved the issues it report.
Best regards and keep mapping
Anton Khorev (2020-07-22 17:03:57+00:00): Если телефонов несколько через точку с запятой, вы только последний форматируете?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7133464307/history
parukhin (2020-07-22 19:03:41+00:00): По разному, 812 код не трогал, не уверен, есть там коды типа 8122. Областные тоже не выделял, а 800 и 9ХХ исправил.
BCNorwich (2020-07-22 18:31:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you removed the garage name. Is fuel still sold from the premises? If not then the amenity=fuel POI should be removed.

Regards Bernard.
Robsav (2020-07-23 08:00:05+00:00): Hi, I have now (I Think) removed the Fuel POI
Robert
BCNorwich (2020-07-23 08:55:23+00:00): Very good Robert, Thanks.
Regards Bernard.
JLZIMMERMANN (2020-07-22 19:04:09+00:00): Dans ce changeset, il y a des maisons qui ont été supprimées depuis votre compte. Ces maison sont pourtant bien présentes sur l'orthophoto et le cadastre.
Y-a-t-il quelque chose de particulier qui s'est passé ?
tux67 (2020-07-23 06:01:22+00:00): Hi LukasJoeris,
bitte achte darauf deine Changes immer mit einem Kommentar und einer Quellenangabe hochzuladen. Das erleichtert anderen Mappern zu verstehen was gemacht wurde und woher die Daten stammen.
Gruß tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88359492
tux67 (2020-07-23 06:28:35+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag .. Hier stimmt was nicht. Das neu eingetragene Gebäude hat die gleiche Addresse wie die Freiwillige Feuerwehr um die Ecke: https://de-de.facebook.com/FeuerwehrNirm/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88359492
CupIvan (2020-11-01 17:40:36+00:00): а что это вы за unclassified дорогу до Уткино нарисовали? загрузите треки в OSM, а то на спутниках её нет, там поля распаханные
trigpoint (2020-07-22 17:39:33+00:00): Hi Hemat
Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit.

The houses you have added are already mapped meaning that you have created duplicates. I have reverted this edit.

For a beginner it is far easier to learn using iD for the osm site, josm is quite advanced.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-07-22 17:41:37+00:00): Hi Hemat, the school is already mapped on the surrounding campus. Adding a node is a duplication, also the school is not called Canterbury.
I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
eserte (2020-09-27 14:40:15+00:00): Auf dem Koppenplatz gilt meines Wissens nach weiterhin Tempo 10.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 09:21:39+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
palanp (2020-08-07 22:16:47+00:00): While these area names reflect subdivision data, they aren't practically useful as they are not the areas common names. Is there a good reason not to stick to the neighborhood area name of "Wellington Heights" and instead to use outdated subdivision names from 100 years ago?
karson_ (2020-08-07 22:43:13+00:00): I see where you are coming from and understand that OSM is supposed to represent what is on the ground.

Mapping something as an area means that it has well defined edges. This technique works well for administrative districts like counties, city boundaries, or even subdivision boundaries. If an area is residential, then it makes sense to try and split it up by subdivision. The areas may as well have names since someone may refer to them. If you look at it from the perspective of the rendered map, a very small subdivision will only show up at zoom level 100m or 300m, so most users won't even notice.

If a subdivision doesn't have a well defined name, like "palanp's subdivision", then I typically add the tag noname=yes onto the area since no one would refer to it by that name.

To address your concern, if this whole region of Cedar Rapids is referred to by people as Wellington Heights, then that should take precedence over the mapped subdivisions. I assume Wellington heights as the region isn't well defined, so using a node might be the best approach. Tagged with place=suburb or place=quarter, this node would take precedence over the mapped regions. On the map, it would render Wellington Heights instead of the area names.

I hope my suggestion is acceptable to you. At least take it under advisement before axing the areas.
palanp (2020-08-08 01:03:05+00:00): That does make a lot of sense! Thanks for explaining.

The City has several neighborhood areas defined. I would consider these similar to the neighborhood areas in Chicago, in that you would want to see these names - and not subdivision names - when you zoom into the map:

https://cms.revize.com/revize/cedarrapids/2020%20NA%20Map.pdf
karson_ (2020-08-08 13:29:25+00:00): I checked with the city website, and those areas are very well defined. Since you seem to be more familiar with Cedar Rapids than me, if you want to rename the areas, you have the go ahead from me.

Definitely add in the Taylor and Northwest Neighborhood regions, since they have no labels right now.
whb (2020-07-24 09:30:14+00:00): Guten Tag,

wo soll den das Tempo 20-Schild stehen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25340629/history
Ich konnte es nicht finden.

Viele Grüße
whb
Sawan Shariar (2020-12-12 19:47:35+00:00): Hi Whb
Thank you for your concern. Somehow it got pasted on the features. And thank you for fixing it. Happy mapping :)
zstadler (2020-09-23 15:13:02+00:00): Hello Sokuya,

This section of Kibootz Galuiot is tagged as a highway=footway with motor_vehicle=yes.

This is a very unusual combination.
Please consider using highway=living_street : "רחוב הולנדי" - Residential road where there is no sidewalk or other separation between pedestrians and vehicles.
palanp (2020-08-07 22:22:58+00:00): Again, not understanding the value of marking subdivision names when the community uses popular nomenclature for the neighborhood area.
user_5359 (2020-07-23 06:39:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/155689746/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_5359 (2020-07-23 06:31:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.

Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=building if you has the tag building=yes (for example).
eggie (2020-07-22 20:01:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-22 20:04:15+00:00): Review.. Je zou evt de toegangsweg kunnen intekenen met highway=service
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-07-23 04:35:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/155755785/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
ACarlotti (2020-07-23 18:25:53+00:00): Hello Daniel, and (a slightly belated) welcome to OpenStreetMap

I'm a little confused by this changeset. Firstly, this is because your changeset comment doesn't say anything useful, and certainly doesn't help me or anyone else to understand what you're doing. You also haven't given any indication of what sources you've used to take make the changes - there's a big difference between how much other contributors can trust a changeset if it's based upon someone visiting the location, compared to if it's based upon out-of-date or hard-to-read arial imagery. Another thing that would also help is splitting this up into two separate changesets, since the changes in London are unrelated to the changes in Hull.

Secondly, the changes themselves seem a bit odd. The change in London appears to be a realignment of the outline of a building under the station, but this new alignment doesn't seem to follow any building edge that I can deduce from other mapping and arial imagery. You also set the layer to 2 for some reason, even though the building seems to be under the tracks (which I think are level 1).

The changes in Hull also seem surprising. Has New North Bridge House been demolished? I can't see any evidence of this online. You also created new nodes for a building shared with an underground cable, which might have been accidental and is probably wrong - I wouldn't expect an underground cable to be running directly under an external wall.

Can you clarify what is going on with this changeset, and fix any errors you think you've made?
Thanks,
ACarlotti
daniel1272 (2020-07-23 18:43:12+00:00): Sorry ACarlotti I got a little sloppy in my editing. New North Bridge house wasn't demolished I simply forgot to re add it since it was out of wack. I will reedit all my mistakes and take more care in future
daniel1272 (2020-07-23 18:45:45+00:00): how do i revert?
ACarlotti (2020-07-23 18:55:31+00:00): I don't know how to do it in iD, but the wiki lists some ways of doing it in other editors:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback

Also, there's lot of other useful advice on the wiki. Some pages that might be particularly relevant to you are:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
user_5359 (2020-07-23 04:29:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please use simple building=yes.
Rival8347U (2026-03-26 05:00:03+00:00): A part of this changeset has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180435740#map=19/18.547660/-88.300283
ToniE (2020-07-23 08:22:13+00:00): Servus landini,

ist hat evtl. eine falsche Autovervollständigung von JOSM zugeschlagen? Sollte evtl. amenity=parking heißen?

Gruß,
Toni
landini (2020-07-23 08:46:08+00:00): Hallo,

das sollte ein Parkplatz werden, den man zur Zeit nur am Wochenende benutzen darf.

Beste Grüße
Richard
ToniE (2020-07-23 08:52:02+00:00): Servus Richard,

dann würde ich 

access = no 

und

access:conditional = yes @ (Sa,Su)

oder umgekehrt

access = yes 

und

access:conditional = no @ (Mo-Fr)

nehmen, denn amenity=parking:* ist nicht definiert und wird womöglich nicht als Parkplatz erkannt.

Viele Grüße
Toni
trigpoint (2020-07-23 11:13:37+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
aweech (2020-07-22 20:13:44+00:00): Hi,
I saw in this changeset that you deleted driveways that exist in all available imagery layers that I could find. What was your source for this change?
underorbit (2020-07-22 20:37:37+00:00): Replace them if you want, I focus on the roads and don't necessarily think private driveways are important on a map, but knock yourself out
aweech (2020-07-22 21:05:51+00:00): Ok, don't forget that "Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct" is considered vandalism in OSM, so try not to do it again in the future.
underorbit (2020-07-22 21:37:10+00:00): I don't think "data known to be correct" involves PRIVATE driveways that are subject to change at any time at the whim of the property owners.

Also, Unless you're an official moderator, please don't give me orders. This is a volunteer site. Just fix it and move on.
phidauex (2020-07-22 22:47:15+00:00): Driveways do indeed count, and are used by delivery and emergency services users of OSM data. It is true that we are all volunteers, but that makes it more important to follow the community guidelines, not less.
underorbit (2020-07-22 22:49:33+00:00): So fix it if you see it. I don't see the point to haranguing me about removing a couple private driveways. Notice that most of them aren't even on there, right? Am I to blame for that too because I don't automatically add them all? By the way, you're all welcome for fixing a janky road. I'm done.
user_8466505 (2020-07-22 23:14:06+00:00): Please just put the driveways back. They're perfectly fine. Someone did them in Florida near Gateway Elementary
underorbit (2020-07-22 23:21:32+00:00): Don’t you DARE tell me what to do unless you’re sending me a paycheck. I quit. Thousands of edits to improve this thing and all you fucking pedants care about is a couple driveways on a minor cul de sac in a town with its own enhanced 911 system. Fix it yourself if it’s such a big deal to you. Christ.
phidauex (2020-07-22 23:54:31+00:00): Don't let the front door hit you on the backside.
underorbit (2020-07-22 23:57:14+00:00): You got it boss. Oh wait, you’re not my boss so fuck you too. Thanks to all of you for ruining something I once thought was fun and useful.
user_8466505 (2020-07-23 00:21:30+00:00): I take that back. I apologize.
jaap de vries (2020-07-23 06:08:25+00:00): Als je een camping poi toevoegd pad je dan ook de landuse aan?
anoniemOSM (2020-07-27 18:30:48+00:00): Geen flauw idee hoe dat moet. (Wil ik eigenlijk ook niet weten + mijn app OSMand heeft die functie ook niet volgens mij)
Het gebouw met huisnr 180 daar woont de eigenaar van de camping. Tevens is daarin het sanitairgebouw van de camping gehuisvest+een vakantieappartementje.
jaap de vries (2020-07-28 14:14:03+00:00): Als je iets wil toevoegen op de kaart is OSMand geen goede editor. Je kan via OSM zelf dingen aanpassen via ID of JOSM. De locatie ken ik en weet waar de eigenaar woont.
trigpoint (2020-07-23 11:13:01+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-07-23 11:12:40+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
gscholz (2020-07-25 06:12:05+00:00): Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-63.67213&lat=45.06426&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

I wonder how this could happen as you are using JOSM which complains about such errors before uploading.

Kind Regards
Guido
trigpoint (2020-07-23 11:12:09+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
trial (2020-07-23 12:55:35+00:00): "mairie" : à ton âge tu confonds encore desciption (non générique : amenity=townhall) et nom propre ? ;-)
trigpoint (2020-07-23 11:11:58+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil
user_5359 (2020-07-23 04:23:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1121788267/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_5359 (2020-07-23 04:26:58+00:00): same action with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1121788267/history
user_5359 (2020-07-23 04:13:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/155745154/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-23 13:55:21+00:00): This would be `highway=path` + `foot=designated` + `bicycle=designated`+ `segregated=no`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88364393
Kovoschiz (2020-07-23 13:56:17+00:00): If it's not specifically constructed as a `=cycleway`, it should be better as a `=path`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88364747
streckenkundler (2020-07-22 19:25:36+00:00): Eieieieiei... Neue Knotenpunkte... Na das ist ja sehr fein... Danke... :) (gilt stellvertretend auch für deine anderen heutigen Edits...)
Ich merke mir mal deine Edits und baue das demnächst ins Netzwerk ein...

Danke und begeisterte Grüße,

Sven
user_2066394 (2020-07-22 21:26:57+00:00): boundary=administrative und highway=residential wurden gelöscht?
Gogolores (2020-07-22 21:56:20+00:00): Nein, Gemeindegrenze war etwas zu weit nördlich und fällt mit highway=residential  zusammen. Pollinger Teil der Strasse heißt 'Tiefenbachring' !
user_2066394 (2020-07-23 09:01:46+00:00): Antwort eher ja, weil ja tatsächlich gelöscht:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88365045&relations=true

highway hast du zurückgeändert, wie stehts mit boundary=administrative?
Leo Slager (2020-07-22 21:16:17+00:00): Dag leloupbrun,
De toelichting bij de changeset is correct.
Maar dat moet je dan niet nog een keer vermelden bij de naam.
ik wijzig dat even in Laurier.
En dan zonder een toevoeging.
CupIvan (2020-08-14 07:59:24+00:00): привет! когда рисуете дороги - правильно выбирайте статусы, иначе по ним нельзя будет правильно строить маршруты. в данном случае нужно было или понизить статус (до service), или присоединить дорогу к более высокому статусу (unclassified)
https://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-NIZ/routing-map
Max-Kritic (2020-07-25 20:02:30+00:00): Tu fais des erreurs. Voir http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#username=GG-PnEPSE
user_11331355 (2020-07-28 08:54:13+00:00): Ce sera corrigé d'ici fin août.
Max-Kritic (2020-07-29 09:07:43+00:00): Oui,mais tu fais des landuses=résidenciel en superposition et tu utilises des images périmés qui ne correspondent pas à la réalité. On construit beaucoup. Le cadastre montre que des prairies sont transformées en zone habitée. Utilse Josm, c'est mieux.
user_11331355 (2020-07-30 09:19:13+00:00): J'ai fait des premières corrections à Bousignies : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88722417 et Rosult : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88722104#map=14/50.4466/3.3803
J'essayerai de plus utiliser le cadastre.
eggie (2020-07-22 20:13:51+00:00): Je bedoeling is oke, maar graag de info naar de adresnode. office=company dan toevoegen voor de rendering.
Kijk je ook even naar je andere edits.
eggie (2020-07-23 05:45:19+00:00): Info samengevoegd
eggie (2020-07-22 20:11:47+00:00): Geen adresinfo op de gebouwen. Bedrijf naar de adresnode svp.
Gr eggie
literan (2020-07-22 19:56:14+00:00): I've made the request to DWG about your blocking
eggie (2020-07-22 20:10:20+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Bedrijfsinfo toevoegen liefts aan de adresnode..aangevuld met bv office=company..  anders aan een node. De bedrijfsnaam is niet de naam van het gebouw. Het zijn van die regeltjes die je moet leren kenne. Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-23 05:44:12+00:00): Info met adresnode samengevoegd.
Basstoelpel (2020-07-25 13:01:22+00:00): Hallo jungesglück,

gib doch bei Hausnummern immer auch addr:street an, sonst ist die Adresse wertlos. Und achte bitte auch drauf, ob die Adressen schon vorhanden sind, um Duplikate zu vermeiden.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel

https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#15/52.3261/9.1995/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-wronghousenumber-outsideplz-dupes
Planvoll (2020-07-26 11:15:35+00:00): Hallo Baßtölpel,

ja Du hast natürlich recht, das habe ich korrigiert.

Gruß,
jungesglück
eggie (2020-07-22 20:05:58+00:00): Dag leloup.. Is hier geen adresnode?  We voegen geen adresinfo toe aan de gebouw omtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-22 20:07:49+00:00): Adressen op nr 10 en 11 verwijderd.