piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-26 08:57:48+00:00): Kad tai kino teatras mes žinome iš žymos amenity=cinema, tai į pavadinimą nereikia pakartotinai rašyti.
ACarlotti (2020-08-27 15:33:14+00:00): This looks like it's mostly an improvement. However, you seem to have left platforms 2+3 rather squint relative to the adjacent tracks - perhaps you could try to improve the alignment a bit.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-08-25 23:20:06+00:00): Hiya mojo1011!

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additions to the map!

Just a little feedback on this edit (nothing serious, don't worry):

We normally reserve the name tag for actual names of things rather than descriptions. Most features can be described using relevant tags, for example this dog park could be tagged as described on this OSM wiki page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park

Please feel free to reach out if you need any help!
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-02 08:30:37+00:00): Dude, I said you, all roads in Moldova have their classification. If you don't know something, don't do what you think that is correct. this is a R type road, it should to be =primary.
Mike Raust (2020-08-31 12:00:28+00:00): IMHO using separate "source:geometry" and "source" would be a better solution.
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-08-28 04:59:34+00:00): Dude, why you maded these changes? Who said you to make that? All roads from Moldova have their type in OSM -
A-roads (Motorways) - =motorway [But in Moldova at the moment we don’t have this type of roads]
E-roads (European) - =trunk
M-roads (Magistral, Express) - =trunk
R-roads (Republican) - =primary
G-roads (Regional) - =secondary
L-roads (Local) - =tertiary.
Please, correct that by yourself, or I will revert them.
TheJAwesome1 (2020-08-28 16:39:56+00:00): Hello, thank you for the feedback and I appreciate the information. I will certainly revert those particular classification edits. Have a great day!
ACarlotti (2020-08-27 15:25:01+00:00): Hi Mark, welcome to OpenStreetMap

In this changeset you seem to have made changes in several different locations. Unfortunately this makes it very hard for people to work out what you've actually changed. From what I can tell, most of this changeset is some new mapping in Zambia, but it also includes a change near Birmingham. Based upon the bounding box, it looks like there is probably also a change somewhere in Asia, but I can't easily see where this is.

Could you clarify what locations this changeset affects? Also, in future it would be helpful if you could ensure that unrelated changes in different places are uploaded as separate changesets.
wireguy (2020-08-26 11:06:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM Slowbro!  
Sourland Coffee, mmm, I've been.   Tip/comment:  most buildings are rectangular or have corners with right angles.  The 'Q' key will square a selected building.
Keep up the mapping!   Pennington needs it.    Message me if you have any questions.
NotJim99 (2020-08-29 06:01:21+00:00): It *was* properly designated as landuse:residential. type:residential isn't a thing. type:multipolygon is. Please read the wiki. Also you seem to have duplicated the line on the east half.
vobatin (2020-08-29 07:20:28+00:00): There are several examples of uses of the area tool with feature type residential all around. You will notice they all indicate this with the yellow inlay. The other half of lakewood trails also shows the use of a polygon with relation to a residential block. This multi-depth method of designation is unnecessary. You will notice the other half of lakewood trails has no yellow inlay, which makes it immediately obvious something is wrong. This also becomes apparent when in Microsoft flight simulator as the region is not properly interpreted as residential. All these should use areas with feature type residential for simplicity and functionality.
NotJim99 (2020-09-03 01:41:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

It's not OSM's problem you can't see your house in MSFS.
NotJim99 (2020-09-04 02:53:46+00:00): Anyways, please just let me either finish properly breaking them into two separate areas or let me put it back the way it was. Secondly, please don't vandalize the map with fake names as you did near Niagara Falls or put your name on your house. Lastly, I know how an area works; I'm the one who added the other areas you're pointing to. The west half of the subdivision has no color because you changed the type:* tag. You will note that if I change it back to type:multipolyon the line changes back to yellow. The inlay is not strictly necessary.
vobatin (2020-09-19 20:09:39+00:00): I'm sure you know how it all works. I am in no way implying otherwise.  I am stating the fact that the game is parsing up the region incorrectly and it appears clear why it is doing so. The difference in how these regions are defined is different than all the others. It is unfortunate that you have not once asked what the problem is. But in a world where it is more important to be the right person rather than someone trying to learn I expect nothing less. 

FYI that was not my house, it was a place of business that I realized later was not intended to be mapped. Thank you for removing that. I was actually logging in to correc this.

As for the place in Niagara Falls, you are correct.  That is a longer story so thank you for fixing that as well lol. 

Your dedication to the areas you manage is comendable and open maps like this are great because of people like you. My edits here were meant to be constructive so I hope you take a look at the regions and discover the issue.  I'll leave you to it.
NotJim99 (2020-09-19 21:32:17+00:00): Alright. Technically I have Shady Oaks defined the same way in OSM, but I can understand how it would be confusing.

Ok, a lot of people add their house or something near it for their first edit, so I just assumed.

Ok.

Thanks. I'm not sure what you're getting at, but if you're saying you still have an issue with MSFS, you should take that up with Microsoft.
BCNorwich (2020-08-26 06:52:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These residendial areas are within an already mapped residential area multipolygon, Way: 43087098.  Thus being duplication I've removed them.

Regards Bernard.
Reeniz (2020-08-26 00:28:47+00:00): source=Andeshandbook
lucumon (2020-08-26 09:42:15+00:00): No somos tan pocos como crees😉.
Yo de tí desistía, que ya ves que tan pronto creas una nueva cuenta ya te tenemos vigilado. No entiendo que necesidad tienes de perder él tiempo con un tema que en realidad no tiene relevancia alguna, ya que estamos hablando de un simple topónimo. ¿Por qué no aprovechas mejor el tiempo colaborando con la comunidad, y subes cosas que aporten? Puedes hacer una importación del catastro, añadir papeleras, paradas de bus, ¡las opciones son infinitas macho! Cuando decidas cambiar tu actitud, te esperaremos con los brazos abiertos ya que, aunque no seamos tan pocos como crees, tampoco vamos sobrados de usuarios y, en proyectos como este, un usuario nuevo siempre es una buena noticia. Creo q ya te lo han dicho varias veces, pero te lo repito, si quieres pásate por el grupo de telegram de la comunidad española, y tratamos el tema allí, de forma más directa.

Un saludo
Richū (2020-10-07 15:24:06+00:00): Usually Wikidata is not getting added to a riverbank relation. Or not?
pizzaiolo (2020-10-07 23:31:45+00:00): Why wouldn't it be?
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:46:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good. Thanks for adding detail to the restaurant. I'm hoping to try it out one of these days.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89939817
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:44:10+00:00): Tip: rather than delete and redraw features, just changing the geometry saves the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89939997
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-26 06:26:05+00:00): Hi Rosendblack, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting almost 22 highways? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Rosendblack (2020-08-27 14:25:58+00:00): Hi!
Some streets were outdated and the names were wrong, update the names and strokes
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-28 05:50:33+00:00): Thanks for your answer. However, please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects. This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
highflyer74 (2020-08-26 06:22:39+00:00): Hello trexil!

Please be so kind to

- not stretch changeset over such large areas but rather keep it local

- use better changeset comments so that your fellow mappers can better understand your intention

For additional reading check out

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you!
trexil (2020-09-09 00:04:22+00:00): Dear highflyer74,

thanks for the comment. I already identified that practice as problematic.
I ll honour and adhere to osm guidelines and good practices.

have a nice day
trexil
bikingaround244 (2022-03-15 19:08:54+00:00): for Battery st. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8651318/history) you marked the bicycle access as no. I am going to change it to yes. There is no signs indicating that bicycles are no allowed.
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:50:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89940553
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:51:30+00:00): Tip: we spell out street names in OSM to avoid confusion when software tries to un-abbreviate. Instead of Brien Drive SE is Brein Drive Southeast.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89940769
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:51:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89940769
aharvey (2020-08-26 04:39:40+00:00): Hi Stephen, this is good, but a few tips since you asked for a review.
1. looks like you have a few short way segments these could probably be joined together into one way unless you need to use different tags for each section.
2. unless the cycleway is closed, i would leave out access=no, although the bicycle=yes would allow bicycles, access=no could be misinterpreted so it's better to not include that in my opinion.
3. if the pedestrians and cyclists share the same space and don't have their own lanes you can add segregated=no
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:52:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89940891
Thibaultmol (2020-09-03 06:07:49+00:00): Hi, Could you explain why you changed the name of these.
It seems unprofessional and incorrect
tastrax (2020-09-07 11:00:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ff5722 (2020-10-31 15:49:11+00:00): Hi, in the future please use 
highway=construction + highway=motorway 
instead of 
construction=yes 


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838702177/history
Marych_ (2020-08-26 05:23:36+00:00): Можете забор нарисовать вокруг дома
указать где въезд
CDCrom (2020-08-27 07:57:19+00:00): Добавил
j numminen (2020-08-26 05:09:40+00:00): piti olla "katua varten" :)
dgitto (2021-03-29 05:59:16+00:00): Please stop using Navionics data (and write the source so easily). Of course in OSM we cannot use such copyrighted source
dgitto (2021-03-29 06:02:38+00:00): sorry, I repeated the same comment!
canfe (2024-03-01 08:46:42+00:00): node 7845289519 è in mezzo al bosco non bordo strada.
Tolto tag fire_hydrant:position=lane
cartomatto (2024-03-04 10:06:01+00:00): ma siamo sicuri che davvero ci sia un idrante in mezzo al bosco? ne dubito.
probabile che position =lane sia giusto, ma che il punto sia alle coordinate sbagliate e che debba stare a bordo di qualche strada.
canfe (2024-03-04 10:23:57+00:00): Conosco di persona il Bertu90. Ne mette parecchi e sempre giusti.
(suppongo che li prenda da dati comunali, ma è anche nel comune di Usseglio e fa il geometra.
Insomma, mi son fidato.
Magari scrivigli.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 08:10:32+00:00): You need to connect `highway=pedestrian` to vehicular roads for them to make sense in general. `highway=footway` should usually be used instead of connecting them directly to building entrances.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89949433
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 10:48:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:27:06+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
highflyer74 (2020-08-26 06:44:59+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Two hints from my side: After adding buildings be so kind to make them rectangular as they are in reality. You can use the letter "Q" to do it, after selecting the outline. Concerning the sidewalk: in most places we do not add a separate way to do this, but instead rather attach the tag sidewalk=* to the road. This is easier to use for most navigation software and easier to map as well.

Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk to compare.

Also check out

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

If you have any questions, just let me know!
Glassman (2020-08-26 22:55:59+00:00): Mark - is it just a privately maintained road if so it just needs an operator tag to indicate who is responsible for maintaining it. If there is no trespassing signs then access=private is appropriate. If you could verify and correct if needed. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89950645
Mark Plesko (2020-08-26 23:46:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment.  There is not a no trespassing sign that I am aware of.  There are many roads with "private road" on the street sign in this area.  They are of varying widths - some look like normal roads and some are much narrower.  This particular one has a gate though it is left open (at least during the day).

It sounds like access=private is therefore incorrect for any of these, so I will remove it.  However, it is not clear to me how I should mark them as I don't have additional information.  This one might be "Marsh Common P.U.D." but I wouldn't feel confident enough to make that edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89950645
Glassman (2020-08-26 23:59:56+00:00): If there is a gate, it could be access=private. Plus I'd add a gate on a node of the street. The gate is probably more important than anything else, even if it's open during the day. There is a way to add opening hours to gates, but I doubt it's needed.
Mark Plesko (2020-09-02 05:35:01+00:00): I went back.  Both sides have "residents only" signs - newer than Google imagery.  I don't know if gates are ever closed.  It sounds like the proper thing is to go back to access:private and add the gates, correct?
Mark Plesko (2020-09-02 05:47:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90278306
Glassman (2020-09-02 05:50:04+00:00): Thanks for checking. Yes I'd access=private and add the gates. 

Also - We are allowed to use Bing Streetside imagery. Google's terms of service does not allow any use of their imagery.  Microsoft is a good friend of OSM.
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:12:28+00:00): Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
gandlur (2021-02-15 10:34:36+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99300895). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
gandlur.
v1570r (2021-05-12 12:06:11+00:00): ¿Cual es la fuente que empleas? Otros mapas y empresas ubicadas ahí denominan ambas calles "Avenida de las Comarcas Valencianas"

What is your source?
Other maps and business locate here say both roads "Avenida de las Comarcas Valencianas"
FransWillem (2020-08-26 07:50:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I review tasks of new mappers and noticed that you might get some guidance at your mappings. Your mappings are rather inaccurate and not squared.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
FransWillem (2020-08-26 07:53:33+00:00): HI
Anoither issue
Please don't change the hastags on your work. 
These are important to keep track of the mappings.
FransWillem (2020-08-26 07:56:05+00:00): Sorry that I have to bother you again
Please use the maxar Premium imagery
You worked with an 10 years old Bing imagery. Since than much has been changed here
Best regards
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-01 22:07:24+00:00): partial revert: shortening of driveway
dgitto (2021-01-22 15:00:08+00:00): navionics webapp as source? Are you sure Navionics license is compatible? :-))
lehmannkaiberlin (2021-01-22 17:02:47+00:00): Jesus,  no, how can I change the comment? Can you?
dgitto (2021-01-22 17:53:28+00:00): Is not possibile to change the comment. Just avoid to use anymore in the future 😎
Lachgast (2020-08-26 19:43:50+00:00): Ziet er goed uit!
ma-rt-in (2021-10-08 07:24:20+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier einen Imbiss erfasst.
EIn User war nun vor Ort und hat festgestellt, das dieser nicht an der gesetzten Stelle existiert.

Stimmte den die Adresse?
Hier mal noch die Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2880618

vg
vrmap (2020-08-26 14:46:55+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai modificato alcune way del percorso che va dall'arrivo della funivia di Malcesine  al rifugio Telegrafo. Hai inserito il tag name=Baldo-Telegrafo. Una delle regole di Openstreetmap è: "mappa ciò che vedi". A me non risulta che quel sentiero si chiami Baldo-Telegrafo. Tu hai visto dei cartelli che riportavano quel nome? Quello è il sentiero CAI n. 651 che comunque non vai inserito nelle singole way ma nella relazione. Qui ci sono le linee guida per la mappatura dei sentieri CAI: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI
Ho visto che è il tuo primo changeset, se hai bisogno di aiuto/domande chiedi pure ...
Fedepyro (2020-08-26 15:27:45+00:00): Hai ragione! Non volevo mappare un nuovo sentiero, in realtà volevo fare un tentativo per creare una traccia; non volevo nemmeno creare un nuovo itinerario sulla mappa.
E' possibile rimuovere?
Grazie
vrmap (2020-08-26 15:38:38+00:00): Ci penso io, nessun problema.
Ciao e buona serata.
Polarbear (2020-11-01 17:54:14+00:00): Straßenbegleitende werden in OSM typischerweise nicht als separater Weg, sondern als Tag an der Strasse erfasst.
DD1GJ (2020-08-26 09:00:14+00:00): Exportiere als PDF oder SVG und bearbeite das dann lokal weiter.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_on_Paper

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Export

https://maposmatic.osm-baustelle.de/

https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/
DD1GJ (2020-08-26 08:41:09+00:00): Löschung zurückgesetzt, Weg als abandoned gekennzeichnet.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Hallo müritzmartin,

es gab in der Vergangenheit sehr viel Ärger mit der Müritz-Nationalparkverwaltung wegen pauschalen, nicht nachvollziehbaren Löschungen. Um in der Qualitätssicherung einen Überblick zu behalten, verbleiben stillgelegte oder zurückgebaute Wege in der Datenbank und werden durch einen Lebenszyklus-Präfix (abandoned:highway) gekennzeichnet. Sie erscheinen dann nicht mehr auf den Karten und sind eine Warnung vor einer Neueinzeichnung nach veralteten Luftbildern oder anderen Unterlagen.

Das Projekt lebt von den Ortskenntnissen und Beobachtungen der Mitwirkenden. Eintragungen sollten daher stets der Realität entsprechen. Ist die Wegsperrung/Stillegung vor Ort deutlich erkennbar?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
müritzmartin (2020-08-28 06:25:53+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

nach Rücksprache mit den Kollegen vor Ort ist die Wegesperrung vor Ort beschildert. 

Beste Grüße,

Müritzmartin
Cascafico (2020-08-26 12:11:24+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM... e grazie per la fontana: in questa stagione tali dati sono molto utili!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89953303
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 09:31:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624056123/history has amenity = temple that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=temple? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship.

If you used it intentionally instead of amenity=place_of_worship - then what is the difference here?
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-01 21:58:54+00:00): Du hast hier einen neu erstellten Fussweg auf einer Ortsgrenzenlinie enden lassen. Dies ergibt keinen Sinn. 
Repariert
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 08:07:00+00:00): Please don't make `description=` as `name=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89953803
Durko_freemap (2020-08-27 10:09:11+00:00): Ahoj, nesedi Ti teraz tagovanie, highway=path nie je urcena pre motorove vozidla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dpath
& poprosim v kratkosti pisat popis zmien, pomoze to pochopit co zakreslovac zmenou myslel. Vdaka.
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-26 12:32:39+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
aharvey (2020-08-26 09:02:53+00:00): hi Stephen,

Since you've requested a review, just a comment that "self" no u-turns where it's from one road back onto itself like you added in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11546114/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11546115/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11546118/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11546116/history
generally are not needed (it's already assumed you can't u-turn like that) and unless it's signposted as such usually these shouldn't be mapped.