piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-07 03:26:36+00:00): Halo, 
confía en que lo estás haciendo genial. Encontré el problema del cruce de vías navegables en esta área.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/949893689

¿Le importaría volver a comprobar esta área? será útil. déjeme ahora si hay alguna actualización de datos.
gracias
WoodWoseWulf (2021-06-03 21:34:08+00:00): Hi samtheman100,

Welcome to OSM!

We define parks in a particular way, and that definition does not include private yards or gardens.

You can read more about mapping parks here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Frame&Focus (2021-10-29 00:35:25+00:00): Not sure why the mapper put "rock" for barrier type. Also, there isn't a barrier here, verified in person.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105748118
mavl (2021-06-04 15:19:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет дом с правильным адресом:  
  
addr:housenumber=68  
addr:street=улица Республики  
building=yes  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322730054/history  
  
На его место добавляет дом, у которого адрес неполный:  
  
addr:housenumber=68  
building=yes  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949901574  
  
В результате адрес оказался испорченным и поиск по нему невозможен.
ravali_78 (2021-06-04 06:11:16+00:00): Hi T-Avenue Milktea Corner,
I have fixed the alignment of dragged node.Kindly check with node 8797337896,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105815171.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105749179
mweper (2021-06-03 13:57:50+00:00): Hola. Porque has modificado esta parte de la acera separando una de la otra y rompiendo la conectividad que existía en los highway=footway?

Por favor, corrige las secciones que separaste para así no romper el enrutamiento de las vías highway.

p.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872044801
Tantri IRM-ED (2021-06-04 02:23:37+00:00): Hi, mweper. Hope you are doing great. 

Thank you for your correction and so sorry for what We have done. We have reverted the data so you can check this
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/907472795

Please let us know if it still needs to be edited

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hola, mweper. Espero que lo estés pasando bien.

Gracias por su corrección y lamento mucho lo que he hecho. He revertido los datos para que puedas comprobar esto. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/907472795


Por favor, avíseme si aún necesita ser editado.

Translated by Google Translator
mweper (2021-06-04 11:03:24+00:00): Great, thanks!
Keima (2021-06-03 07:08:05+00:00): Hi, 

Are-you sure it is a government office? Searching on internet it looks like a pharmaceutical company.

Best Regards,
eggie (2021-06-09 14:06:39+00:00): Hi 
I changed a lot of governmentoffices into company all over Europa. 
Please check your contributions.
Greetz,
eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-11-18 10:19:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6546
eggie (2021-06-09 13:40:01+00:00): Hi


Why government?
I changed it into logistics.
gr eggie
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-08 04:56:45+00:00): I reverted to previous version. there's an issue about turn restriction and I leave it as is. please feel free to check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/7924137
Let me know if any other issue.
Greeting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105751393
yadathot (2021-06-03 05:35:26+00:00): Modified the geometry of roads and Edited Surface tag as per Amazon Private Imagery.
Korgi1 (2021-06-20 21:27:42+00:00): Why are you using a out of date footprint import that doesn't match best imagery?
AlexeyTyur (2021-06-23 21:40:34+00:00): I do not use Microsoft / BuildingFootPrints. Now, I take the building from Mapwithai, resize them on images from Bing and assign numbers from United States Address. Adding last one says that I somehow use BuildingFootPrints.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-06-03 09:12:10+00:00): Consider reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, your changeset covers quite a large area, notifying a large amount of mappers. Consider dividing it into smaller areas (typically, one per country).
limes11 (2021-06-03 11:15:25+00:00): Should probably be reverted - his 1st CS was vandalism, his 3rd also contains nonsense

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8794017706

Now, tourism=artwork with no name or description. Looks all very strange.
bison166 (2021-06-03 10:02:42+00:00): moin Rainer,
dieser highway=track. Kannst Du bitte noch die track type benennen ?
bison166 (2021-06-03 10:07:27+00:00): siehe hier :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype
Jean-Louis Stanus (2023-01-06 09:06:48+00:00): This track is reported as member the relation route hiking GRP 125.
This should be checked with signs on field. Waiting the checks, the tag access=permissive shoud be set. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2927577#map=16/50.1748/4.7251
eggie (2021-06-03 08:42:15+00:00): Dag BJHen
Elk begin is moeilijk en in OSM zij n afspaken gemaakt hoe te taggen. 
We taggen bedrijven op de adresnode .. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. Ook geen adressen.
Een naam doet niets in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen.

De adresnode heb je nu geplakt aan de gebouwomtrek. Ik maak 'm even los.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105756367

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-03 08:49:28+00:00): Adres en naam verwijderd.
Info toegevoegd aan adresnode

office=tax_advisor toegevoegd.
Een naam alleen doet niets.
Evt kun je phone=+31...  en website=  nog toevoegen.
Zie ook..
office=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office  
MVG
eggie
Cascafico (2021-06-03 08:38:45+00:00): Ciao Matteo e benvenuto in OSM. E' un po' che non passo per quei boschi: sei sicuro che gli edifici e i sentieri o forestali abbiano quei nomi? 
In genere i percorsi (vedi i sentieri CAI) non hanno il nome/numero assegnato ad ogni way, ma alla relazione che li mette insieme; ciò facilita mla manutenzione.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105757305
matteo piker (2021-06-03 09:00:12+00:00): Ciao Cascafico, i sentieri non sono CAI ed i nomi sono quelli utilizzati su tutte le mappe del luogo o sulle segnaletiche presenti all'inizio dei sentieri...Sono del luogo perciò mi sono permesso di aggiungerli.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105757305
Cascafico (2021-06-03 19:58:01+00:00): Ho citato i sentieri del CAI come esempio di percorso come insieme di way.
Se sono nomi segnati sul luogo, hai ovviamente fatto bene ad inserirli.
"Strada militare" è un nome comune e (presumo) non segnalato, quindi da togliere.
Il fatto che siano nomi "utilizzati su tutte le mappe del luogo" non implica che siano trasferibili in OSM.
Syl (2023-10-01 10:48:58+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez enlevé les tags qui définissaient l'activité de l'EHPAD (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145837030). Il a toujours l'air d'être en activité. Pourquoi avoir fait cette modification ?
Raphaël Cellard (2023-10-02 08:47:53+00:00): Bonjour, le changeset auquel vous faites référence date de 2 ans... je ne sais clairement plus du tout quelles sont les modifications que j'ai effectuées à ce moment là.
Cela dit, je ne supprime jamais des tags sauf peut-être si j'en arrive à supprimer un bâtiment pour le refaire intégralement mais c'est très très rare et ça ne semble pas être le cas ici. D'autant plus que les tags se trouvent bien dans mon changeset. 
Finalement, je ne comprends pas très bien de quoi il est question ici...
Syl (2023-10-02 09:08:34+00:00): Dans ce changeset vous aviez enlevé les tags amenity=social_facility, 
social_facility:for=senior et social_facility=nursing_home mais laissé tout le reste. Je peux considérer que c'était une erreur et les remettre ?
Syl (2023-10-02 09:36:49+00:00): Pour voir plus clairement ce changement : https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/145837030
Raphaël Cellard (2023-10-05 07:13:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous pouvez évidemment les remettre. Je me demande juste s'ils n'auraient pas été marqués comme obsolètes. À vérifier :)
Syl (2023-10-05 12:04:26+00:00): Merci pour le retour, j'ai remis les tags. Aucun des trois n'est marqué comme obsolète sur le wiki.
Et désolé pour le ton de mon premier message qui était abrupt et imprécis.
michalfabik (2021-06-04 06:23:22+00:00): Ovo nije naziv zgrade. Trebalo bi dodati tačku sa amenity=social_facility + social_facility=outreach + social_facility:for=disabled 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
Saša Grbić (2021-06-04 06:41:38+00:00): Mi nismo socijalna ustanova. Mi smo odjeljenje na univerzitetu koje pruža podršku studentima sa invaliditetom prilikom obrazovanja.
Saša Grbić (2021-06-04 06:42:56+00:00): Htjedoh reći nismo socijalna ustanova.
michalfabik (2021-06-04 06:47:37+00:00): Nije važno (vidite prvi pasus https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility). Može se dodati "operator=Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci" da bude jasnije.
iriman (2021-06-06 09:30:17+00:00): سلام. نوع فروشگاه‌ها را اشتباهی مشروب‌فروشی ثبت می‌کنید. بهتره نوع دقیق‌تری را انتخاب کنید.
ottwiz (2021-06-03 07:12:04+00:00): A kerítést ilyen szövetes cucc takarja, úgyhogy amiatt nem nagyon belátni, csak ahol éppen nyitva van, emiatt így csak becsülni tudom, de ha teljesen kész lesz az épület és a kerítés nem fog semmit takarni, pontosítom.
luiswoo (2021-06-03 07:23:42+00:00): Удаление данных — это вандализм, а не "корректировка геометрии"
DanGlover (2021-06-12 19:32:13+00:00): Hi Rob - other information suggests the post box at the station is (or was) DT9 3, box 33 is elsewhere and mapped by you a while ago. Do you have notes or a photo to confirm the reference, possibly?

Regards,

Dan
robbieonsea (2021-06-12 20:28:20+00:00): Yes - checking my notes it is meant to be DT9 3.
Probably a typo, now fixed.
Thanks for noticing.
eggie (2021-06-03 07:45:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback Wanneer iets niet klopt  kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster via deze site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Oliemolensingel%2015&resultOffset=0&objectId=0796200001014637&geometry.x=148987.639&geometry.y=411691.394&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0796010001014639

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
domi_id (2021-06-13 22:56:55+00:00): This is broken
Djurgarden4 (2021-06-15 05:07:46+00:00): Hi domi_id, thank you for reaching out about this. Upon further investigation it does seem like there are too many taxiways here, I was following the lines from the aerial imagery but may have gone too far. Is it appropriate to only digitize the taxiways that have yellow markers on either side — as seen in Maxar Premium imagery?
domi_id (2021-06-20 10:12:37+00:00): Sorry for the delay. In this airport there are only two taxiways: A (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516758930) and B (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178767857). All the other lines (comb-like connected to taxiway A) are parking stands and should be tagged as aeroway=parking_position. Digitizing only those with the yellow markers does sound like a good idea.
Djurgarden4 (2021-06-22 12:13:57+00:00): Hi domi_id, thank you for the additional context! I’ll make the appropriate updates here. Happy mapping!
simulator1 (2021-06-07 18:16:32+00:00): This edit seems to be correct.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 07:57:17+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback.
BCNorwich (2021-06-03 13:27:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database with which to compile ground-truth maps. As such everything added to OSM must be accurate and verifiable. You describe this as an online facility thus I take it as nothing verifiable on the ground. If it is an office it would not be the whole building, and a POI would be appropriate. Further, you've removed the residential tag.

Thus I've reverted this changeset.
If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:20:59+00:00): hola! a proposito dell'acquedotto mediceo, il fatto è che funziona ancora, non è solo un oggetto di interesse storico. e le arcate? è vero che non è un "barrier=wall", però qualcosa sì è.

ora guardo un po' sul wiki, o se vedo come stanno etichettati gli archi dell'acquedotto romano entrando in Roma col treno, da Napoli.
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:25:56+00:00): Non ho cercato nel wiki. Quegli archi sono marcati come building=ruins e layer=1. che pure mi lascia perplesso.

Hai altri esempi?
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:28:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Thirlmere_Aqueduct

suggerisce come etichettarlo.
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:38:57+00:00): vedo che una parte già è messa come water pipeline (Way: 264360216).
mau59 (2022-08-04 20:39:30+00:00): Ciao. Non credo proprio che l'acquedotto sia ancora funzionante. Sono presenti diverse interruzioni e parti in rovina. Cito Wikipedia: "L'ultimo uso conosciuto dell'acquedotto Mediceo fu durante la seconda guerra mondiale, dove nel 1943 era l'unico funzionante."
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:54:44+00:00): se lo hanno disattivato negli ultimi 5 anni, non lo so. ma che funzionasse negli anni '90 ed oltre, di certo. ha varie fontanelle in linea in zona San Francesco.
mariotomo (2022-08-04 20:55:36+00:00): (non è in grado di servire la città, ovviamente, ma se vivi in città e vuoi risparmiare sull'acqua minerale, è perfetto.)
mau59 (2022-08-04 21:11:39+00:00): Sempre da Wikipedia: "Ancora oggi le acque della Valle delle Fonti, con le prese medicee ancora funzionanti, sono trasportate verso Pisa tramite delle moderne tubature passanti sotto terra a fianco dell'acquedotto." Qualcosa a Pisa continua ad arrivare dunque (ricordo una storica fontanella in Via Garibaldi, poi spostata), ma non certo tramite le antiche tubature poste sulla sommità degli archi: non sarebbe possibile visto che il tracciato aereo è interrotto in più punti.
mariotomo (2022-08-04 21:46:26+00:00): ah, ok, così mi quadra. bisognerà aggiungerlo il nuovo sotterraneo. ed etichettare gli archi?
mau59 (2022-08-09 08:06:47+00:00): Ciao. Non so se il percorso del sotterraneo sia evidenziato (non credo): bisognerebbe fare un sopralluogo. Riguardo all'etichettatura, quella attuale non mi convince (barrier=wall ecc.) ma non so trovarne di migliori.
canfe (2022-02-04 10:53:16+00:00): Ma se Ethen frutta è chiusa al mercoledì pomeriggio, perché allora lo hai messo nel fixme e non nell'orario??
Cascafico (2022-02-04 11:10:41+00:00): Perché sono mona! :D
simulator1 (2021-06-07 18:14:43+00:00): This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 07:57:31+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 11:22:25+00:00): I've double checked the changeset. According to mapillary imagery, this road is oneway. Please, check this link https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.803385&lng=15.963364&z=20
Rostaman521 (2021-06-10 16:32:57+00:00): Where do you see this? I'm looking here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.80337843000004&lng=15.963285380000002&z=17&pKey=234419381797178 (picture from 2014). The left turn lane in the opposite direction is plainly visible. I think the road is two-way even for non-taxi to help drivers reach the parking lot between the railway and the museum. I can't vouch that it's still there today but I re-surveyed it last year when I added it.
Bolt003 (2021-06-14 11:18:00+00:00): Hello! Please see this picture from 2020 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.803366778333&lng=15.962889259444&z=17&pKey=475263953806669&focus=photo. It has a red "no entrance" sign. Which means this road is actually oneway.
Rostaman521 (2021-06-17 00:50:03+00:00): Thank you for posting that picture, I can confirm that is a no entrance sign. However the text on the white additional panel below says "except for vehicles using parking lot, taxis and trams" (Croatian original: "osim vozila korisnika parkinga, TAXI i TRAM"). The only driveway leading to a parking lot on this block is this  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689750094 and mandatory left-turn lane marking confirms this is where non-psv vehicles have to turn if they proceed east. For picture of the left-turn arrow see layer "osm-hr: Zagreb 2012" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=689750094#map=20/45.80343/15.96348  or photo looking at the two-way stretch from the east side here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.8033576&lng=15.96371847&z=17&pKey=234458048435530&focus=photo&x=0.4772259317385774&y=0.4066604545294265&zoom=0.8780487804878049
Janjko (2021-06-18 10:15:23+00:00): I agree with Rostaman521, this little part isn't oneway for vehicles going into the parking. The signage isn't very intuitive, but I guess that was intended. It's better to show a big red "no entrance" sign for people that don't know about the parking, and a little white "except parking and tram" for people that know there is a parking there.
Bolt003 (2021-06-21 09:20:50+00:00): Thank you for all your feedbacks!
simulator1 (2021-06-07 18:15:37+00:00): It seems that oneway should extend to the end of Kriška ulica. I will survey it in person.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 07:57:52+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 11:17:36+00:00): I double checked the mapillary. It has only imagery for the beginning of the road. Therefore, only the beginning was marked oneway.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 11:23:05+00:00): link to the imagery https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.809862&lng=16.0173&z=20
simulator1 (2021-06-07 18:14:32+00:00): This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 07:58:00+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 11:09:11+00:00): I've checked this one again using mapillary imagery and seems that this road is not oneway. I'll correct it ASAP.
Rostaman521 (2021-06-10 16:43:59+00:00): AFAIK the whole secondary_link is oneway, except for this part between the traffic light and the beginning of the gas station (so cars don't have to drive 1 km east and turn around just to get to the gas station). It's visible on the osm-hr 2018 satellite imagery
Bolt003 (2021-06-21 09:23:02+00:00): Thank you for the feedbacks!
FraukeLeo (2021-08-17 12:58:46+00:00): Hallo archer8472, danke für deine Ergänzungen, aber bitte lies und beherzige künftig https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Danke!
simulator1 (2021-06-07 18:14:19+00:00): This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 07:58:07+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help.
Bolt003 (2021-06-08 10:53:56+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.821355&lng=15.976845&z=18 also, please, check this link. the imagery here shows that the road is oneway
Romwriter (2021-06-07 18:21:38+00:00): Hallo uhaase, vielen Dank für die Ergänzung der Adresse. Beim Namen habe ich Zweifel, ob der wirklich an das Gebäude gehört oder nicht vielmehr an die Gesamtheit des Grundstücks. Dort ist schon das Polizeirevier mit Namen erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314793839
uhaase (2021-06-08 06:32:35+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,

das Gelände besteht aus den Hausnummern 43 und 45 (auch schon vor meinen Änderungen), das Gelände kann also schon deshalb nicht die Hausnummer alleine 43 haben.
Ich habe jetzt den entsprechenden Gebäudeteil mit Hausnummer 43 markiert und auch Hausnummer 45 konkret gesetzt und das Gelände auf 43/45 gesetzt. Als Quelle ziehe ich dafür Serviceportal Bremen - Polizeirevier Findorff heran.
Gemäß der Referenzierung im OSM-Datensatz https://www.polizei.bremen.de/sixcms/detail.php?gsid=bremen09.c.1791.de kann ich nur beipflichten, dass die Polizei eigentlich nur postalisch in Hausnummer 43 sitzt (und demnach nur der Gebäudeteil mit Polizeirevier Findorff beschriftet sein sollte, habe ich aber wunschgemäß trotzdem so belassen). Das gesamte Gelände (also auch mit den Parkplätzen) gehört der Immobilien Bremen in Form des gesamten Grundstückes/Geländes inkl. der 3 darauf befindlichen Gebäude… 

Besser so?

Gruß
Ulf

Mit freundlichen Grüßen 

Ulf Haase (Extern)
Teilprojektleiter Bremer Verwaltungsnetz [BVN] in dNetz (Netz 2025) 

Dataport 
Niederlassung Hamburg
Billstraße 82, 20539 Hamburg
www.dataport.de 
ulf.haase@dataport.de
Mobil:    0171 5117675
Romwriter (2021-06-08 18:18:28+00:00): Hallo Ulf, das kann ich nachvollziehen. Danke! Beste Grüße, Romwriter
eggie (2021-06-03 08:54:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM
De naam is niet  (ingang via Lorentzlaan) Dat kun je onder description kwijt. 
Zie..
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-06-03 09:29:06+00:00): Bedrijfsaard en description toegevoegd.
Evt kunt u zelf website= en phone=+31...  toevoegen

MVG
eggie
Cascafico (2021-06-03 09:08:21+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM :-)
Dopo discussione, in Italia si è deciso di mettere il nodo dell'indirizzo dove c'è la targhetta o, in mancanza, dove c'è l'accesso specifico..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105763848
nw520 (2021-06-03 10:50:39+00:00): Hallo mueschel, danke für die Korrektur. Gab es eine Änderung am Schema? Ich habe noch vage in Erinnerung, dass in irgendeiner Tabelle stand, dass der ref auf diese (komische) Weise angegeben werden sollte, finde aber keinen Hinweis mehr darauf.

Beste Grüße
mueschel (2021-06-03 12:57:27+00:00): Hallo,
die Doku findet sich hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_office

Das ist der aktuelle Stand nach dem kürzlich akzeptierten Proposal.
Bei "ref" braucht es den Prefix "post_office" nicht, da besteht ja keine Verwechslungsgefahr mit Tags die sich auf den gesamten Shop beziehen.
BrackoNe (2021-08-20 13:20:26+00:00): Hi, my name is Nemanja. I'm an editorial lead manager of the Microsoft Open Maps team.

We can see that you were really active in this area. We would like to know where did you get the speed limits of the highways?

For example, we could see that you've put 60kph speed limits at the section of the road where it is 130kph.

If you were setting speed limits to yellow traffic signs, these are temporary because of the construction works.

Also, we can see that you have set HGV speed limits to 90 kph across the highway.

At the moment of writing this message, we do not have 90 kph traffic signs ANYWHERE in Serbia. If you wanted to set an implicit speed limit, it is regulated by the law. There are very different speed limits, which differ for the trucks >7.5t, and <7.5, if it has a trailer, etc.

The whole law is available here:
https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_bezbednosti_saobracaja_na_putevima.html

Would you please respond as soon as you can since these edits might be very wrong?

Thanks,
Nemanja