piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2016-07-04 09:27:31+00:00): Hello HAL_Lux! 


For this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38684925 You've set it as access=private and bicycle=yes. Doesn't this mean instead that its access is permissive?


Also, if bicycles have access, wouldn't pedestrians (foot) have the same right of access?
HAL_lux (2016-07-04 10:55:28+00:00): Hi,

Oh yes i see.... i didn't see the bicycle tag, i will remove it later, since there is a "Chemin privé" sign
SHARCRASH (2016-07-04 16:31:02+00:00): Thanks for the response! I corrected anyway since I noticed another tag issue on the same way + others (route=bicycle should only be used on relations), will check if there is a cycling route.  :)
HAL_lux (2016-07-05 04:47:39+00:00): Thanks to you too for correcting it :) It was on the Auto-Pédestre of Steinfort i've noticed it that it was a private path... btw, it was a nice little circuit ;)
Commodoortje (2016-07-03 17:03:16+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. POI was al aanwezig. Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.

Het gaat om 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181385166

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37074714
d1g (2016-07-03 19:33:38+00:00): 1. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351808802/history - этот частный дом жилой, для чего нужно было снимать landuse=residential?
dr&mx (2016-07-03 19:38:22+00:00): о, хоспади.
там весь квартал теперь landuse=residential, зачем дублировать?
d1g (2016-07-03 20:41:05+00:00): зачем удалять точные объекты?

на этот бред http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4280392092 и http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299593661

Обосновать "14 квартал" у 10 домов я смогу, чем обоснована клякса http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299593661 после правок dr&mx?

Почему http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90618631 относится к 14 кварталу?
d1g (2016-07-03 20:43:57+00:00): Дублирования не было, dr&mx. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299593661 был меньше чем http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299593661 и не пересекался.

Дублирование вызвано вашими бесполезными переобозначениям и неуспешыми (по моему мнению) попытками угадать землепользование без знаний местности и границ объектов.
dr&mx (2016-07-05 09:47:34+00:00): дублирование появилось когда я указал общий участок, если что.
14 квартал - не мой тег. я его просто оставил и отметил участок землепользования. если он состоит из более чем одного именованного, то милости прошу указать то, что вам кажется нужным путём разбивки на несколько.
dr&mx (2016-07-05 09:51:14+00:00): поправьте меня, если ошибаюсь — участок landuse=* может содержать в себе и объекты других типов. например, в жилом массиве может находиться торговый центр или производственная организация и для них не обязательно отдельно указывать соответствующие ключи. т.е. характеризуется общее назначение участка.
user_599436 (2016-10-01 14:07:55+00:00): Thanks for adding this! 

Access and physical tags such as highway=path and bicycle=yes should go on the member ways rather than the parent relation though.
MCDA (2016-07-03 18:03:33+00:00): Please use the correct format for the phone tag.  For more details see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Alecs01 (2016-07-03 16:51:57+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! ho unito i tag che hai messo qui nel nodo che avevi creato prima per non avere nodi duplicati: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4279945278
HMZMMD (2016-07-03 17:31:23+00:00): Ciao e grazie
ma pero sulla mappa non vedo quello che ho creato..
Alecs01 (2016-07-03 18:19:45+00:00): Ciao, prova ad aggiornare la pagina del browser e dovresti vederlo, io lo vedo ora, l'aggiornamento delle immagini ("tiles") non è immediato ma comunque piuttosto veloce, il ristorante lo trovi anche se cerchi il nome nel riquadro "Cerca" in alto a sinistra. Buona continuazione, se hai bisogno di aiuto chiedi pure
Protoxenus (2019-03-01 10:02:36+00:00): Hallo,
du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die gesamte Peenebrücke Wolgast als "movable" getaggt. Das ist nicht richtig. Nur der Mittelteil ist beweglich, nämlich aufklappbar. Würdest du so freundlich sein und das berichtigen?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Peenebr%C3%BCcke_open.jpg
Danke 
Protoxenus
MCDA (2016-07-03 18:08:01+00:00): Please remove earlier changesets and only comment on what this particular changeset is doing ie "Adding restaurant and bar"
MCDA (2016-07-03 18:14:22+00:00): Also, there is a Bar and Restaurant located in the middle of the road?!?
Kate McCarthy (2016-07-03 20:41:51+00:00): Hi, How do I remove them? Thanks.
literan (2016-07-04 13:53:18+00:00): Здравствуйте! этой правкой вы зачем-то убрали теги landuse=industrial
type=multipolygon с отношения https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3308894/history - видимо, случайно (любые удаления требуют комментария). Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее, я восстановил.
maraf24 (2016-07-03 19:16:03+00:00): To jakiś żart, czy ten przystanek naprawdę tak się nazywa?
nyuriks (2017-09-26 23:25:33+00:00): Hi, you added https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainbuche as a website to tourism=information objects node 4252910796 and node 4252878004.  Could you double check what they should be?
highflyer74 (2016-07-04 06:18:18+00:00): Moin!

Hast Du die Möglichkeit, die Reiterhof Einträge dem Wiki entsprechend zu gestalten (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Riding bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Reiten)? Ansonsten sind Deine Einträge für andere nicht nutzbar.

Auch ist es wichtig, als name=* nicht Reiterhof zu nehmen. Das name=* Tag wird nur für Eigennamen verwendet. Die Funktion eines Objekts ergibt sich aus den anderen Tags. Wenn Du also den Namen des Reiterhofs hast (z.B. Reiterhof Meier), dann ist name=Reiterhof Meier richtig.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!

Gruss aus HB,

Oliver
PT-53 (2016-08-16 15:51:30+00:00): Zufahrt zu Geb. Kirchberg 8 ist nicht korrekt mit der Kirchberg-Straße verbunden (siehe keep right - http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=78990962
Kümmerst Du dich darum ?
Grüße
wuff57 (2016-08-17 17:23:33+00:00): Done
*Martin* (2016-09-02 19:32:21+00:00): To parkovisko sa naozaj vola Ihrisko?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170446990
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:00:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285707908/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/
aceman444 (2024-05-19 14:19:39+00:00): Yes, they are probably equivalent. I was just keeping the original author's choice of schema :) I did not add it, just changed access:pedestrian to access:foot.
Anyway, it seems foot=yes was added since then.
nickjohnston (2016-07-03 17:04:06+00:00): Accidentally submitted my change with an old comment. Realigned and shortened Haywards Lane slightly, and added a public footpath from the end of the lane to an existing path.

Also added a path to the playground.
Tchiller (2016-07-13 13:40:24+00:00): does the postbox really have a name?
I have deleted the space at the end of the name.
chnav (2016-07-05 13:41:59+00:00): удалено, персональная POI
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-07-03 18:33:24+00:00): thanks, sadly that looks like it was one of my typos.
letihu (2016-07-10 20:31:20+00:00): Schade, dass dir hier JOSM wohl abgestürzt ist. Die Gebäude sin doppelt gemappt.
Z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428954346/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428954114/history
d1g (2016-07-03 19:02:43+00:00): Спасибо!

Вот история откуда имя:

Было решено присвоить роднику имя трагически погибшей три года назад в горах Кавказа студентки СГАУ, туристски и альпинистски Даши Раньжиной. На укреплённой на фасаде мраморной плите выбита надпись: «Секция спортивного туризма Саратовского аграрного университета. 2015 год. Дарьин родник».
http://sarmedinfo.ru/news/301
maraf24 (2016-07-03 19:09:36+00:00): Proszę nie zamieszczać tutaj osobistych informacji takich jak "mój dom".
Firefishy (2016-07-10 22:13:19+00:00): Thank you, some great first additions. Happy mapping. Lekker in die Kaap ;-)
maraf24 (2016-07-04 10:09:52+00:00): Widzę, że dodałeś tourism=attraction.
Czy te bunkry są udostępnione do zwiedzania? Do wielu z nich nie nawet dojścia narysowanego, jak w takim razie mogą być atrakcją dla turystów?
Okorzec (2016-07-04 10:35:14+00:00): @maraf24 - dziękuję za komentarz. Tylko niektóre bunkry z pierścienia Twierdzy Wrocław są/bywają udostępnione oficjalnie do zwiedzania. Bunkry z linii południowej w większości są otwarte i można je zwiedzać (tzn. nie są zamknięte i nie ma zakazów, płotów), choć wymaga to czasem przejścia przez pole uprawne (więc można zrobić to np. w zimie lub po żniwach). Ale status dostępności nie oznacza wg mnie, że wszystkie nie mieszczą się w  "tourism=attraction". Tutaj uzasadnienie, czyli opis na wiki Tag:tourism=attraction: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction   "A general tourist attraction." Nie widzę wymogu "dostępności". Sama możliwość zrobienia zdjęcia z drogi i zobaczenia bunkra może być atrakcją, zwłaszcza dla "turystów historycznych" i fanów takich konstrukcji, urbexów itd.
maraf24 (2016-07-04 12:08:14+00:00): Dostępność jest istotna, zwłaszcza, że część z nich jest dobrze zasłonięta przez roślinność. 
"general tourist attraction" oznacza, że ma to być ciekawe dla większości turystów - takich typowych, a nie specjalistycznych.
A większość tych bunkrów to jest atrakcja dla wąskiej grupy pasjonatów. Im ten tag jest zbędny, bo mają inne (military=bunker i historic=yes).
Dając tourism=attraction kieruję się wymienieniem miejsca w ogólnych przewodnikach turystycznych, oznaczeniem na miejscu, fizycznym stanem (możliwością chociaż zobaczenia), oraz faktyczną obecnością tutystów w danym miejscu. I przynajmniej dwie powyższe cechy powinny wystąpić.
Okorzec (2016-07-04 12:55:57+00:00): Rozumiem. Czyli zostawiamy ten tag, dla zagospodarowanych obiektów, w których znajduje się muzeum, są godziny otwarcia, przewodnik, park linowy itd. - cokolwiek stworzonego "w celach turystycznych". Ok. Ostatnio dodałem ten tag do pomnika przyrody,  głazu narzutowego w Sulęcinie, ale wydaje mi się, że tam może pozostać. Co do tych południowych bunkrów - zaraz usunę ten tag. Dzięki za uwagi!
Supaplex (2016-07-04 02:00:45+00:00): 位置有點怪怪的，被標在T字路口上
PT-53 (2020-07-19 05:46:11+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz;
Du hast an diesem Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2733764686/history
das Merkmal
highway=steps
gesetzt.
Dieses Merkmal ist ausschließlich für Linien vorgesehen:
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsteps
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Nachtspazz (2020-07-19 19:00:09+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Offenbar ist das Tagging fehlerhaft. Leider weiß ich nicht mehr, ob sich an dieser Stelle überhaupt eine Treppe befindet oder ob sich der Fehler auf anderem Weg eingeschlichen hat. Daher habe ich das Tag nun entfernt.

MfG
Nachtspazz
Nachtspazz (2020-07-19 19:06:23+00:00): Habe eben noch meine Aufzeichnungen von vor 4 Jahren gecheckt: Kein Hinweis auf Stufen o.ä. Nur ein Vermerk, dass es sich um eine Brücke handelt.
mikecc (2016-07-04 18:35:15+00:00): siehe mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3126587914
sander79 (2016-09-11 15:17:08+00:00): Hoi Vincent,

de tag 'opening_hours' van Slagerij 'Van Schie' is niet correct
Vincent Vandalon (2016-09-12 06:47:52+00:00): Tag aangepast in #42092593, bedankt voor het meekijken! Wel logisch dat het format van de value van de property zo gedefinieerd is.
maraf24 (2016-07-03 20:57:10+00:00): Ależ Stempart już tu był od dawna.
Po co dodawać drugi, i to z adresem innym niż na ich stronie?
arming_telenav (2017-01-09 12:17:52+00:00): Hi,

Is there any update regarding the motorway? Do you know if it's still in construction ?
cserpell (2016-07-29 19:55:36+00:00): Gracias por tus aportes de restaurantes, son muy valiosos. Este en particular ya estaba agregado al mapa, unos metros más al norte. Borraré este punto para que no esté duplicado. Saludos,
dbf_ (2016-07-10 06:15:36+00:00): Пожалуйста не вводите названия ЗАГЛАВНЫМИ буквами, если это не аббревиатура.
Hjart (2016-07-04 09:10:12+00:00): Det ser ud til at du har slettet gamle veje og erstattet dem med nye her. Det er generelt en dårlig ide, idet historikken går tabt på denne måde.
Hjart (2016-07-04 09:14:54+00:00): Jeg tror det er bedst jeg reverterer tilbage her, idet der alligevel er grundlag for en del oprydning.
Hjart (2016-07-04 09:51:56+00:00): Jeg har rullet dette rettesæt tilbage, dels for at få historik tilbage og dels for at få styr på alle de løse ender mm der var opstået som følge af det.
maraf24 (2016-07-03 21:03:23+00:00): Formalnie to ten przystanek nie ma adresu, bo ten jest przydzielony budynkowi.
user_5359 (2016-07-04 18:47:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one tag source, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Constable (2016-07-04 10:04:26+00:00): Are you serious, does Khoooooonamoooon is the real name?
Geography Canada (2016-07-05 14:11:19+00:00): If China is written in Mandarin, Serbia is written is Serbian, and Mongolia is written in Mongolian, (and so many more), then Eritrea should be written in Tigrinya, its own language.
user_5359 (2016-07-04 18:55:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I see only residential buildings on the aerial images. Please describe the castle mor detail, or I decide it is a fun entry.
literan (2016-07-04 14:20:53+00:00): за вандализм получите блокировку
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-07-03 22:36:36+00:00): Sam numerek adresowy to za mało. Przydałoby się dodawać miejscowość i/lub ulicę: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Pozdrawiam
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 15:44:13+00:00): this added a fast food in the middle of the road, is this correct?
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 16:08:55+00:00): are there really 2 cafes with different names at the same spot?
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 16:09:28+00:00): sorry, forget about that comment, it was a temporary rendering problem...
TheDutchMan13 (2016-07-04 00:24:27+00:00): wrong changeset name, should say (Added address from note)
emergency99 (2016-07-04 16:25:25+00:00): Bitte in der Relation die Reihenfolge der Stationen richtig eingeben. Dafür bitte JOSM nutzen. Ich werde das reparieren, wenn ich heim komm. Hällt der N75 echt 2 mal bei Rochusgasse?
hanzlan (2016-07-04 21:07:28+00:00): sorry, bin da nicht so mega erfahren mit josm :P
ja tut er auch wenns am Fahrplan der wiener Linien nicht angezeigt ist. bei beiden Stationen hängen die Nightlineschilder.
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-04 01:51:16+00:00): DZAF-AM 1422
muralito (2016-07-05 02:15:05+00:00): Marcos, si sabes el nombre de las ferreterias ponelo, pero no pongas "ferreteria" por nombre.
Tambien aportan mucho el resto de los datos, direcccion, telefono, opening_hours, etc.
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-04 02:40:34+00:00): DZHA 1071
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-04 02:49:10+00:00): DWRX 93.1
Supaplex (2016-07-05 17:39:53+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
rickmastfan67 (2017-05-27 17:12:27+00:00): I've noticed in this changeset that you removed all the 'A1A' mentions along the Bennett Causeway.  Was this in error, as I thought A1A was signed with 528 in this area.
user_5359 (2016-07-04 19:51:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Pleas notice you are NOT a church!
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:46:09+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:46:25+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:46:40+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:46:52+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
Sarvihepo (2016-08-25 05:04:01+00:00): Please.

This is the second artwork that you have tagged, that is not an artwork. Furthermore, I assume you are trying add a gate to the KAUST compound that is already on the map, about 100 meters to east of where you put it!
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:51:28+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:51:41+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:51:53+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2016-07-04 09:04:31+00:00): wg http://mpklomza.pl/component/attachments/download/4 ten przystanek nazwya się McDonald's, a nie Statoil.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:52:04+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:52:17+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2019-01-05 16:21:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:20:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
TheSwavu (2016-07-05 21:05:08+00:00): Is there any reason why you are not using the LPI NSW Imagery? It should be available in JOSM at the bottom of the Imagery Menu.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Gh0stz0x (2017-03-28 22:43:35+00:00): Scusa ma perchè hai cambiato da footway a cycleway? siamo sicuri che non sia un sentiero (highway=path). A quel che ricordo è un sentiero. Comunque, se vuoi creare il percorso Le due Torri, non devi andare a modificare i tag sulla way ma devi creare una relazione. Mi indichi quali sentieri "usa" questo percorso?
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
wambacher (2016-07-05 21:08:29+00:00): Hi,

wieso hast du type=boundary und boundary=administrative gelöscht?
dadurch ist die Stadtgrenze entfernt woirden.

Bitte sei als OSM-Newbie ein wenig vorsichtiger und lösche NIE, was du nicht kennst.

ich habe das korrigiert.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-07-04 19:46:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice you are NOT a church.
ianlopez1115 (2016-07-04 07:52:29+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/10 for added information on this changeset
trigpoint (2016-07-04 08:01:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a public database and not a somewhere to add personal markers.
trigpoint (2016-07-06 11:59:25+00:00): No response so reverting as it looks like a personal marker
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:39:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Nakaner (2016-07-21 16:51:15+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40926142
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Toyota Nexus7 (2016-07-04 14:52:05+00:00): Adding bilingual is perfectly legal.
Before remove name you should have a discussion. It's vandalism.

Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
Example
Brussels

Brussels is completely bi-lingual, which means that the city council must operate in both languages, and no language can be preferred. The city council solves this f.e. by alternating name signs with Dutch and French as top language.

In OSM, this is reflected by the "first mapper rule". The name=* tag in OSM contains both the French and Dutch name, separated by a spaced hyphen (f.e. name=Rue du Marché aux Poulets - Kiekenmarkt), and it's the first mapper who determines the order of the names (changing the order of the names afterwards is considered vandalism). Next to the bilingual name tags, there are also name:fr=* and name:nl=* tags which can be used to render or search the data in a specific language.

Similar to the name tags, address tags are also bilingual. Every address in Brussels should have the following tags:

    addr:street=*: The streetname, in the same order as the name of the street object (so determined by the first mapper of the street, not by the first mapper of the address)
    addr:street:fr=*: French street name, equal to the name:fr=* tag of the street.
    addr:street:nl=*: Dutch street name, equal to the name:nl=* tag of the street.
Toyota Nexus7 (2016-07-04 15:10:57+00:00): Please rollback the deletion. I appreciate that.
Toyota Nexus7 (2016-07-04 15:46:44+00:00): Try CSS3 unicode-range https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-3/#unicode-range-desc

in your mapbox product
ramyaragupathy (2016-07-04 17:34:24+00:00): Hi @Toyota Nexus7, your point on Brussels holds good. However in India, the general agreement is to use English names for name key and have a separate tag for Indic languages. Related reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
PlaneMad (2016-07-05 05:44:53+00:00): Its perfectly ok to have multilingual names in the `name` tag but goes against the convention we have been following in India till now for simplicity. Please join the discussion on the talk-in mailing list to discuss why you think this is a good idea.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-July/002615.html
Geography Canada (2016-08-23 22:41:13+00:00): Maybe it should be in just Tamil, then..
SomeoneElse (2016-08-24 08:39:10+00:00): @EzekielT As has been said many times before in OSM, "languages are complicated".  I suggest that you respectfully follow PlaneMad's advice here if you believe that something is wrong.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2016-07-05 17:38:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:38:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-07-04 09:02:00+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is your business really in the middle of the road?
Providing it is verifiable, i.e. visible signs, then please re-add it in its correct location.
Please stick to facts and leave the spammy advertising out of OSM, we are not a business directory.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:37:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.