piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alpigraie (2021-09-16 07:19:45+00:00): Buongiorno Canfe,
le chiedo scusa per la risposta tardiva. 
Allora si, nel momento in cui sono stati evidenziati questi problemi abbiamo subito interrotto il caricamento dei dati.
Il caricamento che stavamo effettuando stava avvenendo in collaborazione con il GAL Valli di Lanzo, Ceronda e Casternone dopo un lungo dibattito a cui ha partecipato anche Marco Brancolini al fine di implementare i dati delle strutture presenti sul territorio GAL. Dopo i primi caricamenti, anche grazie ai vostri commenti, ci siamo resi conto che i caricamenti non erano idonei e perciò ci siamo subito interrotti e abbiamo ripreso il dibattito su come poter aggiornare i dati in modo conforme alle regole di OSM. 
Grazie per la collaborazione.
SekeRob (2021-08-19 11:30:14+00:00): PS tweak road position and add farm track.
iWowik (2021-08-20 07:12:49+00:00): названия улиц записаны не верно 
"Адрес загружен из ЕГРН, требуется проверка правильности заполнения тегов." Проверку не прошли, откачено
Patchanka (2021-08-19 11:47:16+00:00): bonjour
merci pour vos ajouts. Cependant, j'ai vu que vous ajoutiez systématiquement un nom aux différents points (toilettes, DAE...) . Pouvez-vous noter qu'il ne faut pas ajouter de nom si l'objet n'a pas vraiment de nom (par exemple un restaurant a un nom, oui. Mais des toilettes ou un défibrillateurs en ont rarement un). Le nom ne doit pas servir à décrire de quoi il s'agit.
Dans OSMAnd il suffit de ne rien mettre dans le champ "nom".
Plus d'infos ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names
Merci d'avance
djibux (2021-08-19 14:32:22+00:00): Excellent, merci pour cette contribution, je ne savais pas !
iWowik (2021-08-20 07:11:17+00:00): Проверку не прошел, откачен
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-19 12:22:19+00:00): Hey Niall_Kerr,

Please use and align to Mapbox. You can find it in the right sidebar (layer menu). You can switch to other imagery (Maxar) to check your mapping.

Regards,

Daniel
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
eggie (2021-08-19 12:21:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedbackk.. De aansluiting heb ik wel even aangepast aan de noordzijde.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ilbailba (2023-04-15 14:14:50+00:00): Merhaba. Gaziler Mahallesindeki binaları ekliyordum ki Akse Sapağı Metro İstasyonu'nun çalışma alanının binaların içine girdiğini fark ettim. Bunun diğer İstasyonlar için de olabileceğini tahmin ettiğimden dolayı ulaşmak istedim. Bu yazıyı gördüğünüz sırada inşaat alanlarını güncellemiş olmam gerek. Ayrıca, bu istasyonları çizerken hangi kaynakları kullanıyorsunuz acaba? (Profilinizdeki kaynaklarda bulamadım.)
SekeRob (2021-08-19 13:30:45+00:00): NB iD Editor 2.20.0 often does not warn on save, which was never the problem in 2.19.6. Worse, you tag inner or outer, get a warning on save, go back and see the tag took hold, yet the yellow blob comes up that the outer/inner tag was not applied. Really slows editing down these false positives. At times it takes even 5-10 seconds or never for any alert to show. Edit in fully updated Vivaldi on Chrome engine, all permissions granted.
fkv (2021-10-13 21:56:24+00:00): summit:register on node 3709542249 is as wrong as summit:book, because it is a cave and not a summit. Please use the approved tag tourism=register instead.
maro21 (2021-09-09 21:52:15+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa? Na tablicy budowy jest "budowa budynku hotelowo-handlowego": https://polska-org.pl/9350660,foto.html
mavl (2021-08-20 13:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
iWowik (2021-08-21 08:49:52+00:00): Проверку на правильность не прошло. 
Неверный формат номеров домов
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874679778/history
Откат
mavl (2021-08-21 16:42:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Немного информации об адресах в OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
trial (2021-08-23 20:13:45+00:00): Bonjour pourquoi "correction" ? facebook et contact:facebook ne sont pas équivalents, pour le second "It must be an official way of contacting". L'avez-vous vérifié ?
LudovicG (2021-08-24 04:57:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Non je n'ai pas vérifié effectivement.
Désolé si j'ai commis une erreur.
Pouvez-vous m'expliquer la nuance avec des sources ?
Si le second est un moyen officiel de contact, dans quel cas le premier dois être utilisé ?
J'avais lu la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook qui m'avait l'air clair mais j'ai peut-être mal compris quelque chose.
Merci par avance.
trial (2021-08-24 18:31:36+00:00): C'est dans la page indiquée : "It must be an official way of contacting". Sauf que je vois que maintenant ils sont partis pour fusionner les deux en contact:facebook... et il semble en fait que par là ils voulaient exclure les pages de fans. Bref non que ce soit un moyen officiel de contact mais une page officielle. Bizarre, ils font donc l'hypothèse qu'avoir une page FB en fait un moyen officiel de contacter l'entité. Or typiquement si je veux réserver des croissants, typiquement je passe ou j'appelle, si par contre je contacte via FB, est-ce que ce sera lu régulièrement ? Si c'est lu une fois par semaine et pas par une personne qui a le cahier de réservations...
LudovicG (2021-08-27 06:48:05+00:00): J'avoue que je ne suis pas un expert ès Facebook. D'après les pages FB que j'ai pu voir, on peut contacter via une messagerie instantanée et on y trouve parfois des informations comme le téléphone, les horaires d'ouverture ...
Je dirais que c'est un moyen de contact unilatéral : le commerçant nous transmet des informations (qu'il peut éviter d'avoir à donner à chaque fois par téléphone par exemple).
Cela dépend aussi du type de commerce, la pertinence peut être plus ou moins importante selon les cas.
Si on veut faire évoluer le tag, il faudrait peut-être une clé facebook:fan pour bien expliciter le type (mais comment "valider" quelle page de fan retenir ?).
trial (2021-08-28 11:57:34+00:00): Je n'ai pas de compte chez ce GAFAM. Mais pour moi "contact" c'est un moyen de les contacter. Pas un moyen pour eux de nous fourguer leur pub. Je parle uniquement de pages FB de l'entité, pas de celles de fans. Pour les fans, il faudrait une liste, ça évite les susceptibilités et les décisions arbitraires.
zorglubu (2021-08-19 14:46:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour vos contributions. Il n'y a pas d'erreur mais notez que les étiquettes addr:city et addr:postcode ne sont pas utiles en France, même si elles sont suggérées, car toutes les communes sont délimitées par leur contour.
Et si la commune fusionne avec une autre, ces étiquettes risquent de créer des incohérences.

Merci encore, et bonne continuation avec OSM !
pos513 (2021-08-20 06:51:36+00:00): Ahoj, prečo motorway_link? Až po križovatku v priemyselnom parku je to normálna komunikácia neoznačená ako diaľnica. Navyše podľa wiki motorway_link znamená implicitne zákaz pre chodcov a cyklistov, čo nie je pravda.
mapko (2021-08-20 09:37:16+00:00): Ahoj, áno ale podľa CDB je to privádzač. Ako to potom správne označiť? 
Ak nevieme tak unclassified je riešenie.
mapko (2021-08-26 19:59:07+00:00): Ahoj. Vrátil som to späť a doplnil ssc:class=motorway_link. 
Ďakujem za upozornenie.
tio-Jorge (2023-10-29 10:29:53+00:00): Шановний Limonadik_XT 
Хоч це було зроблено 2 роки тому, але лінія 515321254 - це вулиця , яка називається Світла 
вона не може бути track
Якість покриття позначають іншими тегами
literan (2021-08-19 15:43:26+00:00): они здесь не выступают, откат
https://www.ncb-heritage.com/%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B0
Kokosnøtt (2021-08-21 19:18:40+00:00): The stretch of road (Borgavegen) between Hegglandsdalsvegen and Nordmarka is now wider after a road reconstruction that was completed in the winter of 2021. This part of Borgavegen has never been steep at all. Would this part have "tertiary standard" or must the whole road between Hjelle and Osøyro be wider to count as tertiary?
 

The busiest section is the section between Hegglandsdalsvegen and Hjelle. Note that the image/background isn't updated as of recently (it shows the beginning work of the upgraded road but not the finished road)
Gazer75 (2021-08-21 20:59:44+00:00): Tertiary is not really set in stone for Norway so some put it on a lot of roads.
Use of tertiary might encourage more through traffic on roads depending on the router used for the app or website.
I believe some routers actually ignore tertiary due to the variation in use cases.
I've become more cautious using this class as my experience with OSM has increased.

Did the Borgavegen get a separate foot- and cycleway or just a sidewalk?

Wouldn't be wrong setting that part to tertiary I guess. Just don't see the point. Unclassified is between residential and tertiary anyway.
Kokosnøtt (2021-08-22 09:43:10+00:00): Borgavegen didn't get a separate foot- and cycleway. 

I think you have better experience when it comes to road classification since you have been editing on osm for longer than me.
va41 (2022-04-27 11:50:21+00:00): Mistä lähteestä tämä tiennumero mahtaa olla? Väyläviraston tienumeropalvelu väittää, että tie olisi vieläkin 62004.
|Yucca| (2022-04-27 20:28:29+00:00): Hetkinen, numerointi näyttää ilmeisesti muuttuneen. Lähteeni on ollut Tunturi-Lapin maakuntakaavan liikenneselvitys vuodelta 2008. Siinä kaikki polkutiet ovat systemaattisesti 5-alkuisia, mutta muuten numerot täsmäävät. Raittijärven vanha numero 52004 löytyy myös KHO:n päätöksestä vuodelta 2013, joten selvästi se on ennen eri ollut.

Mutta en yhtään epäile, etteikö Väyläviraston kartta olisi oikeassa, en vaan ollut tietoinen että tuollainenkin karttapalvelu on olemassa. Ilmeisesti nuo polkutiet on jossain kohtaa viimeisen ~10 vuoden aikana muutettu, ken tietää miksi.

Pitääpi muuttaa takaisin 62004:ksi...
va41 (2022-04-28 09:04:28+00:00): Niinpä näkyykin muuttuneen. Wikipediassa näyttää olevan selitetty vanhempi numerointijärjestelmä lähteenä tiehallinnon toimimaton sivusto. Sen uudemman järjestelmän kuvaus näyttää löytyvän ainakin Väyläviraston sivuilta kohdasta
Palveluntuottajille > Palvelut ja aineistot > Tierekisteri > Tieosoitejärjestelmä (pdf)
ja sen dokumentin liitteestä 1, "Yhteenveto tienumeroalueista".
Milaviy4 (2023-01-10 14:04:45+00:00): Hello. When will this section towards Odžak and onwards be under construction?
literan (2021-08-19 15:41:46+00:00): вк умер, сайт взломан, откат
mavl (2021-08-20 13:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
Lee Carré (2021-08-19 16:38:02+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
literan (2021-08-19 15:40:02+00:00): это опять антреприза, играют на чужих сценах. Это нам не надо
literan (2021-08-19 15:38:17+00:00): судя по сайту, они здесь не выступают, откат
eggie (2021-08-19 14:42:19+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Opgelost..
access=private verwijderd van het openbare weggedeelte.
Nu je ook gebruik maken van de oversteek. 
Gr eggie
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
Langlaeufer (2022-03-04 23:28:21+00:00): Hi Kevin,

if you change the path type from path to footway you have to delete also the access tag for bicycle. But in this case here it would be better to delete the cycleway because it is not a good idea to model it as two ways. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109933948
eggie (2021-08-19 14:34:47+00:00): Bart... Maak altijd een verbinding met de kruisende weg. In dit geval het fietspad. Ik heb dat nu even gedaan.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
felipeeugenio (2021-08-19 17:46:36+00:00): Hola. una vez que dibujas el orchard es redundante dibujar arbol por arbol lo que hay dentro del orchard.
sMapeas para algún tipo de app? juegas a algún juego?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109934875
gordo anorexico (2021-08-19 18:00:19+00:00): Mapeo para tener datos más actualizados porque salgo a andar en bicicleta o a caminar y uso OSM, porque es gratis, personalizable, y es más actualizado.
literan (2021-08-19 15:36:39+00:00): это не театр, а театральная компания, тут офис судя по сайту
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
skyper (2021-08-20 12:17:46+00:00): Hallo krjkotam
Bist Du Dir sicher, dass diese Zufahrt eine Zugangsbestimmung hat? Ist das nicht eher "permissive"?

Wie ich sehe, setzt Du sehr häufig `access=private`. Hat sich Euer Taggingstil wieder verändert?
Könnt Ihr bitte Eure Verwendung von Zugangsbeschränkungen endlich dokumentieren, da wir diese Diskussion schon öfters hatten. Danke.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
krjkotam (2021-08-24 12:29:33+00:00): Hello Skyper, 
Thanks for reaching out to me. I have added access=private, as the building data represents an industrial building which is not accessible for the general public. From the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private), I could understand that the access=private tag would be more feasible than access=permissive. Please let me know your views on this. 
Regards,
krjkotam
skyper (2021-08-25 11:13:18+00:00): HI krjkotam
Wenn da kein eindeutiges Zeichen vor Ort vorhanden ist, bleibt es, wie im Wiki beschrieben bei `permissive` und ein `FIXME=recheck access`.
Da ich diese Diskussion schon mit einigen Deiner Kolleginnen und Kollegen geführt habe, könnt Ihr das bitte auf einer Wikiseite, welche Euer Taggingschema beschreibt, festhalten. Vielen Dank.

Ciao skyper
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
DoctorSpeck (2021-09-03 20:24:40+00:00): why have you removed the relations for wetland areas? these help in organizing like-areas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109935243
351293 (2021-08-22 15:23:55+00:00): Hallo, Du hast Gebäude/Adressen im Rotkehlchenweg ergänzt. Dabei kam es zu einem Duplikat.
Evtl kannst Du Dich am https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2815843 beteiligen, der diesen Fehler darstellt.
Liebe Grüße
aceman444 (2022-05-08 12:29:15+00:00): Zdravim, to ze sa nieco nezobrazuje na konkretnej mape nie je dovodom na zmenu dat, ak su spravne. Nastupistia ako body su uplne v poriadku (hlavne pri autobusovych). Vasou zmenu ste nastupistia zduplikovali (tie iste su aj bodom aj ciarou), co je zle.
Jedna vec je bod, ktory reprezerntuje zastavku (na mieste oznacnika ci pristresku), obsahuje vsetky jej vlastnosti a public_transport=platform (a je clenom relacii liniek MHD) a druha vec je ak teda velmi chcete vyznacit dedikovany kus chodnika, ktory sluzi na cakanie pre ludi. Tomu staci highway=platform a ine znacky pre zastavku nepotrebuje.
Alebo naopak dat vsekty znacky zastavky na ten kus chodnika a potom uz len pristresok dat ako amenity=shelter bez inych znaciek, ako su robene zastavky elektriciek v Bratislave. Ale nie zmiesat to dohromady alebo zduplikovat. Ano ten neporiadok zacal uz jeden pred Vami a Vy ste to len dorazili :)
aceman444 (2022-05-08 12:40:10+00:00): Teraz myslim napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843023253/history
DUGA (2021-08-21 14:09:25+00:00): Hi,

You have created a huge mess in Salisbury MD, likely all your changesets starting from this one to the most recent will be reverted.

Please carefully read wiki before making any edits, you will be closely watched:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
marc__marc (2024-09-01 15:46:09+00:00): Bonour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8090082/history
est-ce que la ligne est réactivée ?
le problème est que l'objet décrivait un vestigne de ligne et que ta modif décrit une ligne active
à minima il faut mettre abandonned=yes si elle n'est pas active
Cordialement,
Marc
YLHBrussels (2024-09-11 12:26:44+00:00): La ligne n'est pas abandonnée puisqu'elle est active et exploitée par une association . Sur une ligne abandonnée il n'y a pas de véhicules qui roulent, ici il y en a (le weekend)
marc__marc (2024-09-12 16:25:39+00:00): Merci pour ton retour, ce n'était pas clair vu que ton message parlait d'abandonnée.
maintenant c'est plus clair :)
bon mapping
Dominator123 (2021-08-19 14:06:23+00:00): Добавлен театр Тень
iWowik (2021-08-20 09:13:10+00:00): А зачем в названии слово Театр? Так не делается.
Он и по тегам amenity=theatre
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109989624 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942156].
Colin Smale (2021-08-19 16:09:07+00:00): Hi Jack, thanks for sharing the ways between the admin and ward boundaries! I notice your boundaries seem a bit offset by a few metres compared to the OS boundaries... Is that the reason you delete the existing nodes and create a completely new way instead of just splitting the existing one? I would like to understand where the offset is coming from though... Can you point me at your source and/or send me one of your data files?
Colin Smale (2021-08-19 16:18:19+00:00): oops sorry, I see that you have reused the existing nodes, but you have moved them over... Interested in the background to that!
jackespie (2021-08-21 10:06:27+00:00): Hi there, sorry for the delayed reply. What I do is with the boundaries, I export them as points to ensure high accuracy. The reason for the offset I assume is because when boundaries have been drawn previously, they have been drawn roughly based on line geometry not the specific points. I hope this gives you better understanding.
Colin Smale (2021-08-21 10:19:59+00:00): What is your ultimate source? The existing admin boundaries come from the OS. I guess any misalignment could be due to the transform applied from OSGB to WGS84. I know I spent quite some time on getting the right transform - there are various versions in circulation. The transform I use aligns with the results that others get, and aligns nicely with natural features etc.
jackespie (2021-08-21 17:32:29+00:00): I'm using OS OpenData in geopackage format exported using qgis. I've managed to use and epsg:4326 projection, however, i found some files of yours on the wiki of borough boundaries and my files are still off from your files. If you don't mind, could you possibly explain the process on the particular transform you are using?
Colin Smale (2021-08-21 18:24:07+00:00): To produce the GPX files on the OSM wiki I wrote a program to wrap the conversion/splitting process, which uses MapWinGIS as the GIS engine. The transform I declare for the input files (straight from OS) is "+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +towgs84=375,-111,431,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs" and the projection I request from the reprojection is "+proj=longlat +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +zone=30 +north +no_defs +towgs84=0,0,0"
Does this help? If you have a QGIS project you could share I could look at it from that angle.
oba510 (2021-08-20 03:14:07+00:00): Hi.  The bay is not named "Frisco Bay".  The airfield at the Alameda NAS has been closed for a while now - those runways are not active runways and have been abandoned for years.  Saildrone's website is still showing them in the same location.  I have reverted this changeset.  Please keep in mind that this is a map of the real world that people actually use, and shouldn't be used for testing.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
BAK365 (2021-08-23 11:26:36+00:00): Hallo, mir gefällt die ausgeschriebene Version auch besser, aber auf der weissen Standorttafel steht "Mühlehorn Bhf.".  Jetzt gibt es auch einen Konflikt zum Namen in der Wanderroute. Wie wollen wir das lösen?
LG BAK365
skorbut (2021-08-26 18:13:11+00:00): Oh, ups. War mir nicht klar, dass das einen Konflikt macht. Sollen wir es in der Wanderroute auch ändern? Ich bevorzuge die ausgeschriebene Variante, kann aber auch mit der Kurzform leben...
BAK365 (2021-08-27 09:14:09+00:00): Einverstanden. Machst du die Änderungen?
skorbut (2021-08-28 12:12:33+00:00): Erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110377917

Passt das?
BAK365 (2021-08-30 10:34:24+00:00): Sieht gut aus, danke.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
literan (2021-08-19 15:30:31+00:00): не надо дублировать существующие объекты. Собор уже отмечен. То, что там проходят концерты, не делает его театром
mavl (2021-08-20 13:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109989624 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942156].