piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2021-10-23 23:10:43+00:00): No te preocupes. Es algo menor.
rjgambrel (2021-11-17 22:16:44+00:00): Am trying to add some paving info to a number of ways in Washington County. I found this unclassified/minor road which you just reclassified from residential to minor. I would like to change it even further to service road. Only purpose of this and two other connect ways seem to be to service various things like signs and park. OK?
escubic (2021-10-19 19:35:00+00:00): Sergio, there is a topological problem with your edit. The lava field is now broken.
sergionaranja (2021-10-19 20:09:13+00:00): i have just updated I think is fixed
GinaroZ (2021-10-19 21:43:48+00:00): Just wondering why you removed the access tags?
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:07:43+00:00): Two tracks crossing are NOT MAIN ROADS, you should not use the Motorway_junction tag for such junctions.
Please refer to the wiki about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:11:27+00:00): Also, if you draw a Track you should include the tracktype tag and better include the surface, as per the wiki as well.
literan (2021-10-20 17:16:56+00:00): парк уже давно обозначен https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6597414

не надо его задваивать
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:49:01+00:00): Pond is an artificial body of water, this area is a Wetland, Marsh. You should place just 1 element, or an area like you draw or a node, but not both, for the same element being mapped
Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:50:41+00:00): here you can find a nice lake to draw:
-16.87945 -60.86267
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:53:36+00:00): you can also ad some tracks nearby the road that you draw
hsimpson (2022-03-30 13:05:32+00:00): Hi,

it seems like you've missed one way:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38920539

Regards
multimodaal (2022-04-03 20:30:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for your alertness!
I have changed this way to its normal status. Best regards.
ma-rt-in (2021-10-20 17:01:40+00:00): Hallo,

du hast den Hochbehälter erfasst für Neumagen-Dhron.
Was ist den mit Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301897817 ?

vg
Loneship (2021-10-27 18:06:16+00:00): Hallo,

ich hatte nur beruflich am neuen Behälter zu tun.
Was mit dem alten Behälter ist weiß ich nicht genau, aber vermutlich nicht mehr in Nutzung.

Viele Grüße
VA00 (2021-12-27 15:47:39+00:00): Chyba jednak nie dobrze. Nawierzchnia to nie asfalt, tylko płyty betonowe. Acesss też pomieszany: można jechać samochodem, a rowerem i pieszo nie? Dziś jechałem, nie zauważyłem zakazów. Za to są bramy, jedna była otwarta.
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:45:32+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112714378
HarryPlotter (2021-10-19 19:37:08+00:00): Misspelled the source. Used National Agriculture Imagery Program Imagery.
TomPar (2021-10-20 04:17:15+00:00): Hello.  I saw you requested a review.  Always good to see "public" land managers directly engaging with the data.

You added a couple of features that are "non-standard": a line added with a landuse to indicate boundary with private property.

I see this whole area's public parcel could use some sprucing up.  I've never hiked these lands and am not familiar.  But I have access to MassGIS parcels data and OpenSpace layer to guide me.  I've been slowly making my way through "public parcels" throughout the state.  Many had not been touched since the initial MassGIS OpenSpace layer import from 10 years ago.

I'll send you a message when I've done for your review.  Check out my edits to see what I've been up to elsewhere.  Will be in touch soon...
DLCT Ranger (2021-10-20 13:01:58+00:00): Hello & Thank you
I will work on my knowledge and ability with the editing system. The two line segments were intended to be "digital gates" as I do not know how to remove a portion of a longer trail segment. Making the matter more complicated is the issue of digital misalignment of trails, and boundaries vs "on the ground". In the case  new owner of the land that includes the triangular / "pizza slice" piece does not want the public using the trail in the tip of the "slice", so I physically re routed the trail at the site so it stays on DLCT land and installed DLCT trail and boundary signage and I now want to have the digital map "match" in the hope it influences appropriate trail use. Thank you. There are a few adjacent areas also needing adjustment .
TomPar (2021-10-20 13:47:53+00:00): No worries.  I mostly use the JOSM editing tool that I find easier to do such changes...however, it's a much steeper learning curve to get up and running.

The "digital gate" should really be the parcel cadastre aligned correctly.  If there is something physically on the ground, then that can get represented as a barrier or a sign.  Also, the trail can get split and the "old" section tagged with "access=no" or removed altogether if it's clearly "removed" on the ground.

I had a chance already to spruce up the parcels in that area.  Yes, some were misaligned (at least according to the latest MassGIS parcel data...which isn't always correct).  I combined some of the parcels to the south to create a larger "Wylde Woods" for the town-owned land.  Please let me know if anything looks amiss.  I can use strava heatmap data to better align the trails.

If you like, I'm happy to collaborate with you more closely to get everything looking good.  Perhaps we can have a screen share sometime or a call?  Also, I hope to make it down that way soon enough to hike and explore with my son.  We've been making our way around many conservation properties in greater Boston.
pi3rr3 (2022-07-18 08:39:11+00:00): bonjour britzz, je vois que tu as pris quelques libertés comme supprimer des laboratoires (le PIMM), les arbres de la cour pinel (?). et sinon qu'est ce qu'un ampli ?
Britzz (2022-07-18 14:53:13+00:00): Je ne supprime pas sans totale certitude (sauf erreur malencontreuse). Dans ce cas :
- ce laboratoire est toujours là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354292836
- je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir supprimé des arbres (je viens de les "dessiner")
- un ampli est un amphi avec une typo ;-)
chuckfinley71 (2021-10-19 20:32:46+00:00): Thank you! I am still new to OSM editing and couldn't figure out how to tag it properly
ALu68 (2021-10-19 21:55:11+00:00): Your welcome. I think you are doing it right, just look around what the others are doing. Also look in the OSM wiki fhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Mashin (2021-10-20 04:08:22+00:00): If a driveway has no trespassing sign then an option is to just add access=private tag. Definitely don't remove existing roads.
Scooby527 (2021-10-21 14:21:27+00:00): The driveway does not belong to Pleasant St, their addresses are Farmington Ave. I will be adding the driveway to Farmington Ave and marking as private
segubi (2022-02-25 17:18:54+00:00): ... Fahrradweg vor der Kunsthalle, Relation (Weg 699858544): oneway:bicycle setzt voraus, dass der Weg die richtige Richtung hat, sonst wird er nur in die falsche Richtung geroutet! (korrigiert).
BImoBielJH (2022-02-28 10:29:02+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, ist mir durchgegangen...
segubi (2022-08-10 05:50:12+00:00): ... sorry, noch ein Nachtrag: Du hast Kreuzstraße/Niederwall das Tag von red_turn:right:bicycle=yes auf red_turn:left:bicycle=yes geändert, was hieße, man darf bei rot LINKS abbiegen. Hat iD das vorgegeben (evtl. Schablone aus Land mit Linksverkehr)? Dann wäre das ein wichtiger Fehler, der gemeldet werden sollte, oder ist Dir das einfach nur unterlaufen? Hab's wieder zurückgesetzt. Grüße Sebastian
BImoBielJH (2022-08-16 11:37:07+00:00): Muss ein Fehler gewesen sein, danke für das Zurücksetzen.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-12 09:38:55+00:00): Hallo Elisamuela,

du hast ein Review angefragt: Die Informationen, die du eingetragen hast, sind bereits vorhanden.

Die Adressen sind www.osm.org/node/8384563827, www.osm.org/node/8384563828 und www.osm.org/node/8384563829 schon eingetragen. Ich würde den Namen und Kontaktinformationen auf das Gebäude (www.osm.org/way/399327422) mappen.

Direkt übernehmen kannst du:
name=romments. Apartmenthouse Stuttgart
phone=+49 711 400 420 99
website=https://www.roomments-stuttgart.de/

Das Tagging landuse=residential + 
residential=apartments kannte ich noch nicht, aber ich würde die Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential) so verstehen, dass es hier nicht verwendet werden sollte, da es sich um ein einzelnes Gebäude handelt. Dementsprechend würde ich die Tags nicht übernehmen und den neuen Node komplett löschen.
Ich habe aber auch mal auf die Webseite geschaut und das sah nach was größerem aus. 

Jetzt ist die Frage: Ist es hier nur das eine Gebäude, dann würde ich es so taggen, wie oben beschrieben. Wenn es mehrere angrenzende Nachbargebäude sind, dann würde ich den Node nicht löschen, sondern landuse als Fläche kartieren. Die Adresse würde ich aber trotzdem löschen, wenn es nicht möglich ist, alle Adressen des Komplexes abzubilden.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1

DAs ist jetzt einfach eine Frage der Quelle

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Elisamuela (2021-11-16 10:50:01+00:00): Hi,
vielen Dank fürs Prüfen. Du kannst es gerne auf das gesamte Haus mappen. Weitere Gebäude gehören nicht dazu.

Vielen Dank & liebe Grüße
Elisa
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-16 14:31:56+00:00): Hallo Elisa,

ich hab die Tags in www.osm.org/changeset/113854820 auf das Gebäude umgezogen.

Viele Grüße
Peter
Lee Carré (2021-10-20 13:27:47+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
JeroenvanderGun (2021-10-20 13:30:45+00:00): I edited exactly one relation in this changeset...
Lee Carré (2021-10-20 22:15:14+00:00): So you did; sorry.

Habit; my local changeset list is flooded with irrelevant changesets, due to enormous bounding boxes. So much so that the list becomes unusable.
canfe (2021-11-25 14:38:06+00:00): Una street non può avere come valore "Frazione..."
redd (2022-09-10 10:44:48+00:00): Hi natura,
vermutlich ist hier beim recycling_type=Radeln nach Zahlen Altmark etwas durcheinander gekommen!
Das sollte sicher kein recycling_type sein, richtig?
Grüsse,
redd
redd (2022-09-10 10:46:38+00:00): betrifft auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1652526514/history
woodpeck (2021-10-21 13:47:35+00:00): Dear old_wolf, please don't draw mini farmland like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994072157 - if this is a farmland area surrounded by nothing but other farmland, just draw one big area instead of many small areas.
woodpeck (2021-10-21 13:48:12+00:00): Уважаемый old_wolf, пожалуйста, не рисуйте мини-сельхозугодья, такие как https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994072157 - если это сельхозугодья, окруженные ничем иным, как другими сельхозугодьями, просто нарисуйте одну большую область вместо множества маленьких.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-18 14:34:47+00:00): Hello,
Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994072710 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994072711 really part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2382950#map=15/50.4389/-4.7598 ?  They look like an od outlier.
Best Regards,
Andy
amurski (2022-02-18 20:32:42+00:00): Hello, thanks for spotting this. I do not know how they came to be included as I don't recall touching the Saint's Way relation here.
amurski (2022-02-18 20:32:52+00:00): I have removed them from the relation.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-18 20:46:21+00:00): Thanks!
Gregory UKR (2021-10-21 21:32:49+00:00): Hi Mike130, It appears to me that both electrified=contact_line and contact_line=yes provide the same information about a railway, but between these two options the first one is a thousand times more popular. Also, the first option but not the second is the documented way to indicate that a railway is electrified with an overhead contact line. Therefore, when I see contact_line=yes for a railway, I change it to electrified=contact_line, or if electrified=contact_line is already there, I simply remove contact_line=yes. What I don't understand is your changes of contact_line=yes to contact:line=yes given that contact key is typically used to specify contact information, such as phone, email, etc. In this changeset, you have specified tools.geofabrik.de as your source. Which particular tool there was suggesting to make such a change?
mike140 (2021-10-22 10:10:47+00:00): Во-первых "mike140". И чего вдруг по-английски? Насчёт правки - точно не помню - возможно такой вариант предложил валидатор Josm - можете исправить как считаете нужным
Gregory UKR (2021-10-23 21:52:10+00:00): If JOSM is to be blamed for this mechanical change, could it be that you have added to JOSM a dubious validation test? Neither the default tests nor some extra are telling me to change contact_line to contact:line on a railway. You have done a few more such changes back in 2019 and in 2020, and so have done andergrin. On the other hand, jaimemd was removing contact_line (changeset 47496216), which is what I'm also suggesting when electrified=contact_line is already specified. Also, quite surprisingly, contact_line=yes is predominantly used on Ukrainian railways and not much elsewhere on this planet.
On the communication stuff, sorry, a typo in your nickname was not intentional (but 140/one-for-zero might be provocative, or am I too suspicious?). Also, you are questioning my choice to communicate in English (are you Russian?). Among other things, if contact_line=yes gets removed in the favor of electrified=contact_line, this conversation is good to have on record easily searchable and accessible for anyone who might question such disappearance.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 19:53:10+00:00): removido, nao existe castelo aqui
village (2022-01-08 17:33:54+00:00): Ist die Radspur auf der Querstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314655129 auf dem ganzen Stück auf beiden Straßenseiten entfernt oder nur auf (kleinen) Teilen?
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:59:48+00:00): a Path is nor meant to be used by motor vehicles of any kind, for that is used the tag Track. Also for any road that you may add please include ever the tag surface. Thanks
MrMoehritz (2022-02-08 21:03:35+00:00): Hi alterRitter, willkommen bei OSM!
Ich hab den Trafo mal angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117177109 der Name sollte tatsächlich ein Name sein, Trafostation ist eher eine Gebäudeart. Komisch ist, dass das Gebäude angeblich eine Adresse hat....
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 22:01:39+00:00): These water bodies are not PONDS but called BASIN

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:basin
ivanbranco (2021-12-02 17:58:57+00:00): Hi ElliottPlack,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908125554/history

what's the meaning of this tags?

PARK_CODE=MC-P34
PARK_NAME=Northwest Branch SVU 3
ElliottPlack (2021-12-02 18:01:43+00:00): Ivan, Thanks for the question. Those are machine tags left over from the source, the PD MNCPPC Data. I will discard them.
eginhard (2021-10-26 20:27:13+00:00): Welcome and thanks for the great work! When adding buildings I'd recommend to use the "Square" function (by pressing Q) to straighten the angles so they look nice (only if the buildings are actually rectangular of course). Best, eginhard
streckenkundler (2024-09-29 16:04:23+00:00): Hei,

du hast ja mit diesem CS den Knotenpunkt 48 des Netzes Altmark erfasst... Kannst du sagen, wie die Ausschilderung von hier gen Osten ist? 
Hintergrund ist: dem Flyer "Radeln nach Zahlen" des Landkreises Havelland nach ( https://www.dein-havelland.de/radzeit/radeln-nach-zahlen ) muß eine Verbindung vom Knotenpunkt 55 in Steckelsdorf in Brandenburg eben zu jenem Knotenpunkt geben. Auf Brandenburgischer Seite gibt es Schilder: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=875639801139038

Abzweig (unscharf):  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=838324945155320

Hingegen ist der parallele Weg mit einem access=no versehen was ich bezweifle: reingekommen mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50187539

Danke für die Hilfe,

Sven
Natura (2024-09-29 19:18:21+00:00): Hallo Sven,
habe die 48 in meiner Sammlung nicht gefunden:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/7AxSRnuk6jys1X7V6
Fotos sind alle verortet.
Vielleicht kann dir Frau Czinzoll helfen:
Jeanett Czinzoll (VerbGem EHL) <tourismus@elbe-havel-land.de>
Sie weiß alles und hat auch Fotos aller ihrer Wegweiser, soweit sie im Elb Havel Land stehen.
streckenkundler (2024-09-29 19:32:58+00:00): Hei,
Danke für den Kontakt... Ich schreibe sie mal an...

Sven
streckenkundler (2024-09-29 19:52:24+00:00): @Natura 
Mail ist abgesetzt... :)

Sven
streckenkundler (2024-10-01 20:08:14+00:00): Antwort mit Fotohilfe bekommen! So macht das Spaß! Lieben Dank!

Ich hab nun die Route als Rolle connection in beiden Netzen ergänzt, nebst fixme, daß Ausschilderung unvollständig ist. Ich schaue nun, was https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/de/networks draus macht, das access=no an einigen Wegesegmenten macht mir Sorgen...

Soweit erst mal...

Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2024-10-04 16:39:07+00:00): Hei,

@Natura Die Frau Czinzoll hat mich auch auf ihr ALRIS verwiesen: https://www.geodatenportal.sachsen-anhalt.de/mapapps/resources/apps/alris/index.html?lang=de&stateId=e9b9d6e0-ae09-410b-b9d6-e0ae09f10bb9

Hast du dir das mal angeschaut? Da sind offensichtlich auch von allen Knotenpunkten auch Fotos hinterlegt...

Das ist ja eine feine Arbeit!

Sven
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-20 09:39:15+00:00): Prašome negadinti gero žymėjimo. iD redaktorius yra labai labai prastas ir siūlo nesąmoningus keitimus.
Please do not break good tagging, iD is a very bad editor giving incorrect advices.
Partial explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cartography/Waterways
Tramparam Parampampam (2021-10-21 04:00:07+00:00): sorry if you found something wrong in my changes, i moved there by mistake
mariotomo (2021-10-20 21:44:27+00:00): hola Alvarado2510, una pregunta a propósito del "Minisuper Mercadito Miranda": lo pusiste dentro de un "building=house" o sea edificio dedicado a vivienda, de un solo piso. Puedes validar la información? podría ser que es un edificio "genérico", o sea "building=yes"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112719808
BubbaJuice (2021-11-26 17:43:45+00:00): Hello Dylansc,

The Broadway Underpass should not be tagged as a tunnel. It should either be a bridge or a tunnel, not both. It is clear that Broadway cutts through the earth that Toole Avenue was set on but Toole Avenue clearly has a bridge over this cut through earth. Tunnels are normally enclosed also, this has a large gap in the middle of it separating the bridges of the railroad and Toole Avenue.

I will be changing this back to how it was.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice
Kovoschiz (2021-10-20 04:01:59+00:00): There's nothing named "Hong Kong Metro" though?
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 19:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114828622 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incorrect edits to the map due to the use of incorrect tags.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
skyper (2021-11-02 15:38:53+00:00): Hi EvanE
What was wrong about `service=busway`? Yes, it is not documented but I can always create new tags.
Regards skyper
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 11:27:22+00:00): If this is a genuine issue you should file an issue on the ID GitHub as the ID presets and issue checker is where this comes from
DaveF (2022-03-24 20:44:05+00:00): What makes you think I haven't?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 21:06:27+00:00): I admit I should've checked. Sorry
mueschel (2021-10-23 13:05:10+00:00): Hi,
this way got a strange 'psr' tag, could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994100624
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Poretsew (2021-11-02 22:36:07+00:00): Hi Friendly Ghost,
Dit komt niet zo goed uit de verf (pleinen zijn niet meer zichtbaar). Ik stel voor dat je de wijziging terugdraait zodat het weer voetgangersgebied (area = yes) wordt. Dat is ook de gangbare weergave van stadspleinen die in  voetgangersgebied liggen.
Groet,
West Erop
Friendly_Ghost (2021-11-03 06:00:28+00:00): Hoi West Erop,
Helemaal prima, zal ik doen. 
Mvg,
Casper
Poretsew (2021-12-02 20:40:09+00:00): Hoi Casper,
Ik zie dat je nog geen actie hebt ondernomen. Kan je dat alsnog doen of zal ik het voor je oplossen?
Groet, 
Jelle
Friendly_Ghost (2021-12-03 14:39:57+00:00): Hoi Jelle,

Sorry, dit was me compleet ontschoten. Ik moet je ook eerlijk vertellen dat ik persoonlijk het concept van highway=pedestrian + area=yes maar vreemd vind, dus als jij er iets moois van kunt maken zonder deze changeset volledig terug te draaien, dan heel graag. 

Mvg,

Casper
Poretsew (2021-12-03 21:12:12+00:00): Hoi Casper,
Geen probleem, ik heb het net snel even gefixt. Hier kun je terugvinden hoe area=yes icm voetgangersgebied wordt gebruikt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area?uselang=nl
Groet,
Jelle
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
user_14250389 (2021-10-29 08:30:51+00:00): Nikolai E您好，可否不要把七王坟周围的果园和道路贴合？后续修正起来会非常麻烦！希望您能改善编辑习惯！
adiatmad (2021-10-20 04:49:32+00:00): Hi Zayne Chin!
Your edits look great. But it will be better to press Q on JOSM to square the building.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112722919