piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jleedev (2021-09-23 16:59:01+00:00): Generally speaking, the ‘name’ tag should almost never contain a generic description of the feature. natural=water + water=pond is sufficient.
jrh31990 (2021-09-23 17:03:54+00:00): ok, thank you.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-24 21:40:27+00:00): Olá, CODE não é uma tag válida para o osm, verifique melhor a classificação das vias adicionadas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111606504
MKnight (2021-09-24 08:19:32+00:00): Moin,  
ich habe diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht, da sie nicht den Gegebenheiten entspricht. Zusätzlich mappen wir in OSM keine privaten Namen etc.
Moebili (2021-10-05 17:46:01+00:00): Hallo,
bitte um Entschuldigung, werde in Zukunft ernsthafter damit umgehen.
Änderung war richtig.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-13 11:37:32+00:00): What you meant by "tartan"?

Asphalt?

Likely not https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dtartan

(I am asking as I am looking through freeform SC edits - I want to check is interface that I implemented confusing/problematic in some way)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-13 11:38:29+00:00): It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537013797/history way
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 14:00:31+00:00): Plutôt pas d'accord du tout avec la reclassification shop=video_games → shop=gift, pouvez-vous clarifier ce changement svp ?
Syl (2021-10-03 14:23:56+00:00): Bonjour, je ne connais pas le magasin de Pontarlier en particulier mais dans les autres magasins de la chaîne que j'ai vu il n'y avait pas du tout de jeux vidéo (et leur site web ne parle à aucun moment de jeux vidéo).
user_1566574 (2021-10-03 14:37:49+00:00): Je n'ai plus un souvenir exact de ce qui est vendu, mais il y a beaucoup de figurines, d'accessoires, de tout ce qui tourne autour de la culture populaire.
Shop=gift, d'après les exemples et la définition du Wiki, s'adresse plus aux touristes, on trouverais ces boutiques dans les zoos, aéroports, des "objets souvenirs", etc.
Alors que là, c'est axé jeu vidéos, culture populaire. Donc shop=video_games se rapproche plus de cet univers-ci, que celui du tourisme, pour moi. :/
Syl (2021-10-03 14:59:50+00:00): La définition de shop=gift inclut plus généralement les boutiques de cadeaux, pas uniquement les boutiques de souvenirs. Il m'arrive de l'utiliser dans ce cas (notamment pour les autres magasins de cette chaîne). Mais si cela ne convient pas, on peut voir du côté de choses qui sont vendus dans le magasin : shop=anime ou shop=toys.
user_1566574 (2021-10-03 15:10:10+00:00): Littéralement effectivement. Mais ça ne me semble pas adapté ici (autrement Casa ou Maison du Monde peuvent aussi être défini en tel que tel). Merci pour ces suggestions, effectivement video_games n'est pas forcément adapté (même si les produits gravitent autour de cet univers), donc je vais chercher et comparer les 3 attributs pour voir lequel correspond le mieux. Merci ! :)
user_1566574 (2021-10-03 19:32:15+00:00): Le Wiki de shop=toys (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtoys) recommande shop=collector + collector=action_figures pour ce qui concerne la vente de figurines, ce qui est correspond parfaitement (bien majoritairement) à l'activité du magasin !

Merci beaucoup pour votre aide :D
BlogCraft (2021-11-04 02:29:52+00:00): Que edición de pokemon? Deshiciste el trazado de edificio de condominio que realize y el jardin interior que hay al interior.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-04 11:49:32+00:00): Hola
Dice "defectuoso", "sospecha" y "pokemon". Por favor considerar toda la frase.
De todo lo que hizo es todo defectuoso. Hay errores conceptuales grandes y la ejecución es completamente errónea. Pero no se preocupe, eso es totalmente normal en quienes comienzan y estamos para ayudarle. Corregirlo es fácil.

Partamos por lo más fácil: Lo de pokemon es porque el programa que usamos identifica usuarios relativamente nuevos que agregan areas verdes y masas de agua para sacar provecho de esa app y otras que existen, pero que no viene al caso detallar. Si acaso el motivo del área verde no es ese, entonces OK. no hay problema.

Respecto de los defectos:
1) el nodo del condominio lo borré y lo dejé como debe ser, como un area, con su nombre y con los tags de uso de suelo residencial.
2) El edificio lo dibujó como un solo masiso sólido, siendo que son varios edificios y con un patio interior, por favor ver como dibujar edificios en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
3) con respecto al jardín, más que un jardín propiamente tal como es descrito en la wiki, se trata de pasto con algunos árboles, con lo que cabría dejarlo quizás como grass y dibujar los árboles individualmente, además de darles un access=private, al igual que el camino.

Viniendo de un mapero con más de 100 ediciones la ejecución no era muy buena y decidí arreglar lo que resultaba más legible.

No obstante, por favor no considerar esto como que no valoramos los aportes que hace, son muy bienvenidos y por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad para resolver dudas y recibir ayuda si acaso la necesita.

Saludos cordiales y por favor no dudar en escribir si acaso tiene dudas.
BlogCraft (2021-11-04 21:04:46+00:00): Gracias por las observaciones y consejos.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-11-04 21:19:15+00:00): Cuando tenga un segundo voy a dibujar esos edificios para que los tengas como ejemplo.
Saludos y gracias
BikePC (2021-09-23 19:58:59+00:00): De highway is een cycleway met een segregated voetpad. Daarom is foot=yes ok. Maar waarom de maxspeed 5? Die geldt dan ook voor fietsers. Lijkt me onjuist, tenzij er een officieel verkeersbord staat?
Jorisbo (2021-09-24 09:37:57+00:00): Hallo BikePC, ik heb de aanpassing gedaan om routeringsprobleem op te lossen (foot=use_sidewalk zonder dat er een sidewalk was ingetekend). De overige tags zoals maximum snelheid heb ik niet naar gekeken en  gelaten voor wat de vorige mapper heeft aangeduid. 5km/h voor een fietspad klinkt idd niet logisch :-) moest me verbazen als daar een bordje stond. Groetjes Joris
Jerry Glasow (2022-07-23 20:49:32+00:00): Per the official Blue Ridge Parkway Road and Facility Closure website at https://www.nps.gov/blri/planyourvisit/roadclosures.htm, this part of the parkway is open. How do I correct this entry?
aesculus2 (2022-07-23 21:17:10+00:00): It should be open. I just changed the speed on some segments. Closed means that the Edit was closed, not the road.
Jerry Glasow (2022-07-23 21:24:09+00:00): When I create a route in Kurviger.de/en, it shows this exact section as closed. I may have fixed it by changing the Allowed Access All to Permissive, but I really don't know what I'm doing.
aesculus2 (2022-07-23 21:26:43+00:00): At this point if you can get routing I would say you are good. There were a lot of segments on that road that had incorrect travel times last year. Routing programs thought that much of the trip took no time or it would never take the route.
SafetyIng (2021-09-23 23:28:58+00:00): Hey
deine erste Änderung auf access=private war schon richtig. Die Löschung jedoch nicht. Ich habe die einmal rückgängig gemacht. 
OSM ist erstmal eine Datenbank von Geoinformationen, daraus können Karten erstellt werden. Es werden sogar sehr viele Karten daraus erstellt. Auf welche beziehst du dich denn? 
Allgemein sollten aber keine Änderungen in der Karte vorgenommen werden, nur damit etwas "richtiger aussieht", es aber schon vorher richtig in der Datenbank steht.

Grüße
Robin
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-10-21 03:18:04+00:00): 您好，您所描绘的这一个点，位于中华人民共和国大陆地区，而非中华人民共和国澳门特别行政区，故我个人认为它不应适用澳门的中葡双语命名规范，而应按内地的命名规范来写name

还望您的回复

------
Best wishes
快乐的老鼠宝宝
Belonging to OSMChina DT
Frans S (2021-10-09 09:26:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested.
Your mappings here are rather inaccurate. Please take the time to map precise. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Follow the outlines of the buildings with all corners.
To the right of the big buildings it is a bit messy. don't include this in your mapping
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers  mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111608573
user_3022894 (2022-03-30 19:31:57+00:00): Hi,
dendrologisch, wow cool, hatte ich auch noch nie gehört :-)
Bergischer (2022-04-06 06:06:16+00:00): Öhm? War was falsch und wenn ja was? ^^
user_3022894 (2022-04-06 16:37:40+00:00): Hi,
nee nee, sorry für die gestiftete Verwirrung, alles in Ordnung! :-)

Ich fand den Begriff nur so interessant.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
GinaroZ (2021-09-23 22:38:05+00:00): I'm wondering whether religion=none is the appropriate value for non-denominational schools, since technically they aren't non-religious...
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 16:27:20+00:00): The possible values in the data for "Denomination" are:
Non-denominational : 2090
Roman Catholic : 360
Inter-denominational: 7
Episcopalian: 3
Jewish: 1
All schools have a denomination recorded.
In Scotland it seems that schools have to provide Religious Observance: https://www.gov.scot/publications/curriculum-for-excellence-religious-observance/
Paragraph 13 from that seems to be the key bit in explaining what non-denominational schools are like.

From that, I'm not sure that the face that there has to be some sort of religious observance would mean that a school should be tagged with a religion.

There are 23 objects tagged with variations of non-denominational in religion, according to taginfo, out of 1.4 million objects.

I could use a value like that, but I'm not sure whether it has more value, and "non-denominational" seems to have a fairly specific meaning in Scotland.

Happy to be corrected on any of the above
GinaroZ (2021-09-24 18:55:12+00:00): Suppose my thinking is whether religion=* needs to be tagged at all on non-dom. schools. Since they are sort of in between a school which is actually non-religious and one which is religious (eg RC). Assuming that religion=none/no means no religion?
Have all the religious schools been tagged yet?
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 20:10:16+00:00): In general I think it's best to tag something even if that tagging is tagging an absence.
I have not tagged all religious schools yet, so I assume they are not all done
leveskockaa (2021-09-23 23:58:08+00:00): Ennek így nincs értelme, jó volt ahogy volt. Váltó nincs, két vágány fonódik ezen a rövid szakaszon. Most a térképen van váltó, és egy vágány...
kogutowicz-mano (2021-09-24 03:57:18+00:00): Teljesen igazad van! Ez elbaltáztam. Kijavítom még ma. Kösz!
leveskockaa (2021-09-24 07:10:01+00:00): Köszönöm!
Lee Carré (2021-09-24 11:10:13+00:00): To avoid globe-spanning changeset bounding-boxes, which spams the local list of many people, it is much better to keep the area covered by a set of changes small. If you wish to edit many areas, use separate changesets.
iamdavid (2022-10-31 12:21:12+00:00): Hi, foot=designated gehört nicht an alpine Wanderwege. Bitte bei zukünftigen Bearbeitungen beachten. Vielen Dank!
Mastrick_Mapper (2021-09-23 19:22:30+00:00): Apologies for the large bounding box span.
ivanbranco (2021-09-29 19:40:00+00:00): Hi Ems Mondragon,

with this changeset you added "House=yes", is not a valid tag, but you can add house as the building=* value.

Also you added a line without any tag to describe it. What is it? a track? a path?
voltairovicz (2022-10-22 11:03:47+00:00): Hej, co w przypadku kiedy drzewo jest pomnikowe?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-22 11:09:11+00:00): jak ma swoją nazwę (dąb Bartek) to ma nazwę

jak nie ma nazwy, a tylko należy do określonego gatunku to nadal nie ma nazwy

możliwe że fajnie byłoby gdyby drzewa pomnikowe się jakoś specjalnie na mapie pokazywały ale to kwestia stylu mapy
impiaaa (2021-09-24 17:58:28+00:00): Did you really reuse a farmland as a lake? I guess they're sort of next to each other but it's not like the farm was flooded and then teleported. It would have been better to just delete the bad data than to make it worse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111615895
mueschel (2021-09-25 09:52:51+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291205880
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-24 01:14:25+00:00): what do you think about this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129142125/ ?
Murcik (2021-09-26 19:10:33+00:00): И где вы такое название-то взяли:
Старасельская улица?
Имейте уважение к орфографии
Murcik (2021-10-07 11:08:32+00:00): Чуть попозже откачу, раз вам всё равно
5m4u9 (2021-09-24 01:02:28+00:00): Hola JPabloME, gracias por contribuir con los nombres del barrio.

en cochabamba y toda bolivia los nombres de calles comunmente comienzan con el tipo... algo así Calle Sucre, Pasaje Sucre o Avenida Heroínas.

Si puedes lo corriges o sino lo hago yo luego. Si puedes averiguar los de los parques/plazas/areas verdes estaría genial
Vamien (2021-09-23 21:17:48+00:00): Something went wrong here as well. The location is incorrect. Seems there was an issue with my GPS at the time.

Would love to have this deleted because I do not see the option on my end.
nevw (2021-09-23 22:54:36+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as requested
nevw (2021-09-23 23:06:37+00:00): I reverted this too as ATM at incorrect position.
Vamien (2021-09-23 21:16:29+00:00): Something went wrong here. Not sure.

Would like to have it deleted if possible.
nevw (2021-09-23 22:54:50+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as requested
nevw (2021-09-23 22:55:41+00:00): I have reverted this changeset too in view of your comment.
geoaria (2021-11-12 06:42:55+00:00): عدم دقت در ترسیم در این موقعیت اصلاح شد.32.87124/51.54023
خطوط را از روی هم ترسیم نکنید
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-10 17:09:05+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9118610737 by any chance place where cars are stored?

Right now it is tagged as place with special machines for training - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fitness%20station?uselang=en
solenoid jam (2022-05-17 05:47:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154377025

Может с этим надо что то сделать?
literan (2022-05-17 13:48:20+00:00): снести note и тег доступа)
skyper (2021-10-12 13:06:01+00:00): Hi Viki
Please, undelete the relation and fix it properly. As you can see in the object history (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11140744/history), this relation was broken unintentionally and simply removing it makes the situation even worse as it removes more evidence of the original problem. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103312342 for root of the problem.
Regards skyper
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 10:10:05+00:00): Hi skyper,
I'm reverting this case, see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112784036
and I will mention it at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103312342 because it will be easier to fix this case for the local mapper. Thanks your mention!
Regards Viki_travel_weak
archie (2021-09-23 22:18:26+00:00): Inga addr:-taggar på highways, tack!
Carnildo (2021-09-23 22:42:30+00:00): Two of the three things you deleted were marked as "private driveway", not "road".  The correct thing to do would have been to mark the third one as a private driveway as well.
Carnildo (2021-09-24 17:39:24+00:00): I've reverted this changeset.
BCNorwich (2021-09-25 08:10:43+00:00): Hi, You're still mapping hedges across tracks, gates and gaps, the imagery clearly shows this as incorrect. Mapping/tagging landuse (farmland) and barrier (hedge) on an area is not good practice because a hedge is not an area feature, a hedge is a linear feature. 

You are also occasionally joining hedges to highways.

Could you please refrain from your above-mentioned practices?

I've made several corrections but made not have corrected everything.

Regards Bernard.
Durham Mr N (2021-09-25 12:09:18+00:00): If you a business premises then please do add them, but this sort of change is not appropriate in OpenStreetMap
I have reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111685407
eggie (2021-09-24 06:20:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  Wanneer je hier kijkt lijkt het wandelpad en de bruggen behoorljk verschoven
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111621274

Dat zal wellicht per abuis zijn gebeurd.

De naam Kinderboerderij is al aan het vlak gegeven. Je zou ipv nme= .. description= kunnen gebruiken voor het aparte gebouw. Nu geeft het verwarring.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-24 06:34:16+00:00): Een footway=access_aisle is een gemarkeerde looproute over een parkeerterrein. Dat zal hier toch niet het geval zijn?
Zie pad naar de Lange Akker.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Daccess_aisle
Kijk je nog even?
gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-24 06:46:24+00:00): Paden weer teruggelegd conform bgt omtrekgericht en tag access_aisle verwijderd.
Wellicht zou je het gebouw Kinderboerderij kunnen opnemen in een uitbreiding van het vlak tourism=zoo .. zoo=petting_zoo. Ingewikkeld stukje voor een startende mapper. 

MVG
eggie
wielandb (2021-09-25 00:32:30+00:00): Hey :) Nur zur Sicherheit: Woher stammt die Information, dass man hier mit Bitcoin bezahlen kann?
wielandb (2021-10-01 17:28:32+00:00): Vor Ort nachgefragt: Man kann hier tatsächlich per Bitcoin bezahlen.
War etwas besorgt wegen bestimmten Dingen auf der Website des Cafés.
Pete Owens (2021-09-24 23:29:31+00:00): According to Sustranns:

https://www.sustrans.org.uk/find-a-route-on-the-national-cycle-network/route-562/

"Route 562 of the National Cycle Network is in development. Once completed it will connect Southport with Aston via Burscough, Wigan, St Helens, Widnes and Runcorn."
Falsernet (2021-09-25 16:21:39+00:00): Noted! I will leave this as a note instead of a fixme
rowcherryrow (2021-09-27 14:49:11+00:00): Correction: Sources used should have been Maxar Premium Imagery;Strava
geoaria (2021-11-12 06:37:42+00:00): خطوط پیاده در فضای سبز خ مخابرات شاهین شهر
. به هنگام ترسیم مسیرها نباید خطوط از روی هم رد شوند شما وقتی به یک خط دیگر می رسید یا باید به صورت همسطح آن را به هم متصل کنید یا اگر غیر همسطح است می بایست با یک پل یا تونل از آن عبور کنید. خرابکاری شما در این موقعیت تصحیح شد. دقت کنید.32.86929/51.55611
olo81 (2021-10-17 16:59:31+00:00): lcn=yes i network=lcn dajemy do relacji nie bezpośrednio na linie :x
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:37:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map the buildings more accurate by following the rooflines. 
Just a vaque trace don't mean that is is a building. Always look for rectangular form, gray, brown colored with a shadow next to it which proofs it is above groundlevel and most likely a building. 
Always square the building with the Q key,
Best regards
gdt (2021-09-23 23:39:50+00:00): This showed that the building was entirely a business, and the assessor's data and the feel from driving by say residential.   So I separated the residence and the business tags into two objects.   Please feel free to message me directly if you think I did that wrong.  If there really is solely commercial use we probably ought to add a landuse=commercial polygon.
jmapb (2021-09-26 16:51:11+00:00): Hello! I'm guessing you used iD's Extract function to remove the gallery's tags from the building and add them to a POI node instead.

Unfortunately this feature is not aware of the "nycdoitt:bin" tag, which is NYC's reference code for the building. This is one the building's tags, not one of the gallery's, but iD removes it from the building and copies it to the newly created node.

I created an issue on iD's github 3 months ago but it hasn't yet gotten any traction: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8539

Until this is resolved, please manually copy the "nycdoitt:bin" tag back onto the building, and remove it from the new node, whenever using iD's Extract function.

I've already fixed this one!

Cheers, J
MxxCon (2021-09-26 23:55:42+00:00): Oops. Ya, I forgot iD does that.🤦‍♂️ Thanks for fixing it.
BCNorwich (2021-09-24 06:55:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please always try to enhance the database rather than detract from it, for no good reason. It's not OSM practice to delete features because they are incomplete or for personal reasons/preferences.

No harm done though I've reverted the change. The house is one I added four years ago. I forget why but I might one day add the rest.

Regards Bernard.
Lee Carré (2021-09-24 11:04:20+00:00): You surveyed both sides of the Atlantic in the same day?
ElBehaarto (2021-09-24 17:29:59+00:00): Hey,
No, of course not. But I know by fact what the surface of the streets in my neighborhood is or if there are streetlights. I obviously can not answer everything without checking in person but many things I just know because I have seen them hundreds of times.

It's a pitty though that street complete put all those changes in the same changeset. I didn't expect that and just realized. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way in the app to control this :-/
Lee Carré (2021-09-24 20:04:37+00:00): Then source=survey is very misleading.

Based on what you've said, source = local knowledge would be more accurate.

Since StreetComplete is all about surveying, use an editor (like Vespucci, which I notice you've used before) which allows you to set the value of source=* .

As for changeset bounding boxes; SC is for surveying, like I said. If, however, some playboy was jetting around the world, then the smart thing would be to have SC upload quest answers before surveying a new area.
ElBehaarto (2021-09-24 21:44:42+00:00): Ok, I get your point but I'm not sure if the strict differentiation between "local knowledge" and "survey" is very helpful. At what point does a survey become local knowledge? When I have walked a street earlier today and update details about it at home, is it still a survey or already local knowledge? And if I go back to that street and update it while looking at it, is it a survey even though I already knew all the details I was updating? 

My point is: what purpose does the differentiation between "local knowledge" and "survey" serve, when it is so hard to define? Given that StreetComplete makes it very easy and comfortable to update details, while those changes require a lot of time and effort in Vespucci and other editors,  I lean towards accepting that the source might not be 100% accurate in all the cases.
ElBehaarto (2021-09-26 22:33:26+00:00): Well given the vast variety of sources tags I've seen that are often inaccurate or unclear and the fact that I only made those changes in SC from afar, that I am absolutly certain about, I still think, that in this particular case it doesn't matter if some of my changes have a tag "survey" even though it's been a couple of days that I have actually surveyed those details. 

But I still get your point and I do agree in general. It’s not up to me to decide what is a correct tag and what is not. Moreover, even though I know that I only made accurate changes, who am I to be trusted on that? - The changes should of course be verifiable by others and the acccurate source tag might help with that. 
In my defense, I wasn’t aware of the tag set by SC, but now that I am, I will use it as intended to keep the data as accurate as possible. In the end I want to help make the map better and more accurate for everyone and not cause additional issues.
skyper (2023-01-25 23:19:28+00:00): Hi InsertUser,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9118854858 is probably only a `man_made=tower` or even `man_made=mast`, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.
We are looking for a solution to the incorrect use of `man_made=communications_tower`. Do you have any hint for us?

Regards,
skyper
MapNCheese7 (2021-09-24 20:47:58+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery
SMARTPHONEPLUS KREMS Handyshop Krems (2021-09-24 00:37:53+00:00): Handyshop Krems, Handyreparatur Krems, Handykrems