piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opendcc (2016-07-02 16:14:36+00:00): Hallo,

hier wurde versehentlich der Feldweg an die Hochspannungsleitung angeschlossen. Habs korrigiert. Bei Gebäuden bitte 'rechtwinklig machen' klicken.

Servus

Wolfgang
user_5359 (2016-07-02 19:16:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast eine Gebäude über vorhandene Gebäude gezeichnet. Das musste ich leider löschen, da dies in OSM wie in der Wirklichkeit nicht vorkommt. Leider hast Du den Inhalt des Changesetkommentars Möbel Franz nicht eingetragen. Wie man sowas macht? Ich empfehle die http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a als Einstiegseite.
raito (2016-07-03 03:41:20+00:00): Hi. I undeleted most of the woods you deleted (changeset #40451116). Please don't delete them again, unless you have a good explanation why they should not be there. Cheers!
raito (2016-07-16 07:56:47+00:00): Hi, what's up??
Basstoelpel (2021-04-09 17:39:49+00:00): Hi mahau,

if you tag lots of power pylons with structure=lattice and material=steel, you should verify that this is correct. I see design=h-frame, which is usually made of wood.

Regards,

Baßtölpel
Athalis (2016-08-12 17:02:57+00:00): I think you accidentally removed an already existing river with this changeset and with #39846377. I restored it in changeset #41414240 and merged it in #41414314 with the parts that you have added in the meantime.
Jean Passepartout (2016-09-13 18:28:52+00:00): Hi Hooman Mesgary.  Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.  I noticed that one of your edits (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428764436) duplicates an older road with a different name.  Could you please review and fix this?  Let me know if I can be of assistance.  Thanks and Happy Mapping!  Jean Passepartout
Hooman Mesgary (2016-09-14 15:18:52+00:00): Hi Jean, Thanks for your notification. I fixed it.
Jordi MF (2018-08-05 14:46:26+00:00): Hola Antonio,

He visto que modificaste la vía 414789486 hace 2 años. Estaba etiquetada como highway=cycleway, pero tu consideraste que era mejor etiquetar con highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=yes.

Debido a que se trata de una vía segregada para el uso de bicicletas, y mientras no mapeemos la acera para peatones, creo que lo conveniente sería usar highway=cycleway + foot=designated + segregated=yes, según lo recomendado en la Ref S4 en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bicicleta#Miscel.C3.A1neo.

¿Qué opinas? Saludos.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 19:05:16+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hof Melkich auf einen Gelände mit der Schreibweise Mellich? Es reicht übrigens wenn Du das Gelände entsprechende benennst.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 19:18:42+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ein Haus (siehe Changeset Kommentar)wird nicht mit aera=yes gekennzeichnet, sondern mit building=yes. Bitte passe diese an, sonst wird es nicht auf der Karte erscheinen.
Erelen (2016-07-02 23:52:10+00:00): Пожалуйста, постарайтесь редактировать аккуратнее.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=40444269
Firefishy (2016-07-10 22:14:57+00:00): Thank you for adding it! Any other local mapping is invaluable. Happy mapping. ;-)
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-08-10 06:19:16+00:00): Hi Super-Map,
I've added a bridge on the highway (way-428772581), because it's crossing with waterway and I've adjusted the highway (way-428772969) based on Maxar Premium Imagery geometry.
thank you
goedegazelle (2018-07-11 05:05:47+00:00): According to their webpage on facebook it is most likely an amenity and not a shop.
maraf24 (2016-07-02 18:34:26+00:00): Co nazwa "rynek alter Marktplatz" ma oznaczać? Wygląda jak mix polskiego i niemieckiego.
zstadler (2016-07-15 16:19:55+00:00): Hi,

You probably don't know, but the official OSM tag for color using British spelling - "colour".

I also understand you have mapped two section of a regional walking and bicycle network - "Derech Halev". For more information on how to complete the mapping with relations, please see the wiki page at

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Main_conventions

You may also want check out the Facebook group of the Israel Hiking Map

https://www.facebook.com/groups/994960670559126/
d1g (2016-07-03 18:26:03+00:00): 1. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=40445235

Полный бред с landuse=residential, взять хотя бы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299593633 - там частный сектор и многэктажки, для чего их обозначать одним landuse=residential + residential=urban?
d1g (2016-07-04 03:41:16+00:00): 2. В этих местах dr&mx видел железнодорожные переезды с мигающими светофорами?!!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3871222863/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278705357/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278705358/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278705358/history
dr&mx (2016-07-05 10:11:08+00:00):  landuse обозначает преимущественный характер использования
d1g (2016-07-05 12:06:31+00:00): Линия 299593633 указывала только на высокоэтажную застройку из
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106078889 и
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106079139

Чем dr&mx руководствовался изменяя геометрию и не обновляя теги?
d1g (2016-07-05 12:13:06+00:00): dr&mx игнорирует подход к landuse=residential который использвался в Энгельсе и части Саратова, где residential указывается минимальной площадью без земель общего назначения:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138577154
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138621458

Не заметить такое - может только такой опытный пользователь как dr&mx.

Вдобавок к этому - каждый двор или друппа домов (многэтажки или частный сектор) отмечалась отдельно если разница между ними просматриватеся:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236236956/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227741541/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239549426/history

Вывести кляксы которые "обозначает" dr&mx можно в любой GIS автоматически, такие объекты не нужны в OSM. 

Копирование гигантских участков 1-в-1 из кадастра без фактической детализации на несколько НЕ НУЖНО.

Обоснований "для чего" от dr&mx я так и не услышал.
Ratty (2016-07-07 02:37:16+00:00): Можно поинтересоваться смыслом этого огромного changeset-а в результате которого, в частности, никуда не ведущий сельскохозяйственный трек превратился в unclassified дорогу?
Bloodmage (2016-07-12 18:27:54+00:00): Да, я боролся с этими самыми "сельскохозяйственными треками", на которых висели дороги. Прошу прощения, если что-то затронул ошибочно
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 15:23:32+00:00): please do not create changesets that span big parts of the world, as this creates problems with QA tools. Better structure your edits into spatially connected units and upload in small parts.
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 15:29:20+00:00): please also take care to add stuff at their actual location and be as precise as possible (e.g. some stuff you added like a shop was outside of any building, or maybe the building hadn't been mapped yet). Is springfield college really a school or maybe a college?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:20:14+00:00): não é um castelo
reneman (2016-08-08 00:09:08+00:00): Lang: DE: Warum löschst du die von mir erstellten Wälder, Wiesen und Felder?
d1g (2016-07-03 18:29:19+00:00): 1. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=40445540

Значит шлагбаум у https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358046439 видел на местности и специально пропустил?
d1g (2016-07-05 03:48:59+00:00): 2. значит ворота не существуют у https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358046542/history?

https://yandex.ru/maps/194/saratov/?panorama%5Bpoint%5D=45.942447%2C51.593481&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=19.425544%2C-1.558641&panorama%5Bspan%5D=56.612411%2C30.000000
dr&mx (2016-07-05 09:40:54+00:00): это криминал?
я туда не поворачивал, когда прогуливался.
а когда еду на работу, то мысли немного другим заняты, например дорожной обстановкой.
d1g (2016-07-05 12:02:44+00:00): Не поворачивал никогда - не вводи.
Какая "дорожная обстоновка" когда вопрос о двух барьерах у одной дороги?

Если такие правки будут продолжаться буду откатывать любые дороги всего пользователя.

Ещё Волгодонс проверю что этот пользователь накуралесил там.

Предлагаю присоединиться к проектам
http://wikimapia.org
http://n.yandex.ru/
naoliv (2017-02-14 12:14:39+00:00): Adellane, "Posto BR" não é o nome do posto, mas sim a marca/bandeira dele.
Adellane (2017-02-14 15:41:13+00:00): Certo. Vou corrigir outros que tenham esse erro.
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-03 21:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40466791 where the changeset comment is: Restore Morocco name - name should just be one name, not multiple
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:15:10+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
emergency99 (2016-07-02 19:22:05+00:00): Danke für's korrigieren.
emergency99 (2016-07-02 19:26:25+00:00): Nur Leider Stimmt bei den Relationen was nicht. 2 Stationen (Rochusgasse und noch eine) sind irgendwo ganz hinten Werde das wenn ich nach hause komm reparieren.
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-04 22:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40488918 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed automatic edit. please adhere to mechanical edit policy when making such edits.
user_242798 (2016-07-05 19:32:35+00:00): A JOSM edit of - only - fourteen (14!) footways (for which I was last editor!) selected by Overpass Query (<user name="AnkEric"/>) is NOT an "automatic edit".  
This was a FIX on MY OWN edits. I should have corrected these issues during my last edit of each way. This omission was resolved by selecting my own edits by using a Query to find them. But a Query is NOT an automatic edit. A Query is just the selection of ways or nodes to edit. "Overpass Query" is NOT an UPDATE QUERY. Editing is a subsequent manual process.
It's OK to disagree about the correctness of this Changeset, but please don't shoot the method. Shooting the method makes it almost impossible to correct mistakes.
Another example: Changeset: 40044085. 
Comment: "User AnkEric: Café-Restaurant: {amenity=cafe} > [amenity=pub] + [food=yes] + [cuisine=*]".
Source: "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:How_to_map_a:C >> amenity=pub + food=yes (if food is served) >> Do not use amenity=cafe !!!. This tag is ment for "coffee bar" or "tearoom" !!!!".
So - again - my mistake, manually corrected using the appreciated Help of Overpass Query. Now I assume it's not advised to specify "Overpass Query" as a source. Bypass secretly!
Johnwhelan (2021-12-15 18:42:25+00:00): Could you take a look at this duplicate building?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588378427#map=19/36.61216/2.87488

Thanks
Geography Canada (2016-07-02 19:05:30+00:00): Egypt is written in both English and Arabic, for example.
Geography Canada (2016-07-02 19:05:41+00:00): On OSM.
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-02 22:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40448931 where the changeset comment is: Restore Canada name, see changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40333070
Geography Canada (2016-07-03 13:15:30+00:00): It is not restore, Canada was still in the name.
kayle (2016-07-14 05:01:21+00:00): Zdravím, ten ostrov sa volá Ostrov? Ak nie tak to name je tam navyše.
Tiež už nie sú zalesnené? Pôvodne tam bolo landuse=wood
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/119167647
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/119167645
.
Ďalej place=island sa neodporúča dávať na ostrovčeky na riekach a jazerách.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:place%3Disland#Ostrovy_na_.C5.99ek.C3.A1ch_a_jezerech
aceman444 (2020-06-02 00:30:43+00:00): Opravim to, autor po 4 rokoch nereagoval a toto su jeho jedine 2 zmeny v OSM.
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-03 21:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40466826 where the changeset comment is: Restore Eritrea name. The name tag should just be one name, not multiple ones.
robbieonsea (2016-07-03 09:33:37+00:00): foot=yes is *not* needless on a highway=footway, typically it can elude to the path being an official Right of Way.
Often people used this tagging before the community settled on the unambiguous designation=public_footpath tagging.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-03 10:48:16+00:00): I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40455773 .  "foot=yes" can actually be pretty useful, even on footways, as it can differentiate between where there is a right of way and where there is only permissive access.  Also bicycle=no on footpaths isn't universal, so keeping that tag where a mapper has explicitly surveyed it makes sense.
Also note that mechanical edits must be discussed beforehand as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Wynndale (2016-07-03 20:19:34+00:00): The tag foot=yes is much less useful on ways that were created in Potlatch 1, where it was a preset.
GerdP (2017-08-25 05:46:05+00:00): Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
maraf24 (2016-07-02 22:20:41+00:00): Proponuję nie używać maps.me do mapowania. Najwyrażniej nie pokazuje on wielu obiektów, które od dawna są na mapie.
Artur Ridge (2016-07-03 07:29:12+00:00): Maraf24, czy Ty masz jakiś problem ze sobą ? Oznaczylem istniejace charakterystyczne obiekty, zatem nie rozumie w czym problem ?
maraf24 (2016-07-03 10:35:12+00:00): No to jeszcze raz.
Utworzyłeś duplikaty. Czyli naniosłeś na mapę obiekty, które już tu od dawna były. Zapewne wskutek używania nieodpowiedniego narzędzia, czyli maps.me. Jest mnóstwo takich błędów robionych przez jego użytkowników.
Proponuję ci więc zmienić narzędzie. Porządny edytor masz na osm.org. Pod "Edycja".
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-04 22:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40488890 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed automatic edit. please adhere to mechanical edit policy when making such edits.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-08 10:26:02+00:00): Are you sure that there's really a pub here called "Caven club" here?  The Cavern tourist attraction is already marked, and it's not really a pub, is it?
literan (2016-07-03 11:33:14+00:00): и зачем надо было Baccarat Cristal Room дублировать? он уже два года как в базе есть
AndersAndersson (2016-07-03 14:24:39+00:00): Hej!
Bara en nyfiken fråga. Vad är "Arbetet"? Jag lyckades inte få någon vettig träff när jag googlade på det.
maraf24 (2016-07-02 22:16:35+00:00): Miasto twierdzi, że tu, gdzie jest 5a, jest nr 7.
Jeśli to błąd, to warto im to zgłosić na stronie
mkonstantynowlodzki.e-mapa.net
maraf24 (2016-07-02 22:16:45+00:00): http://mkonstantynowlodzki.e-mapa.net
trial (2016-07-02 20:34:28+00:00): il doit bien y avoir le feu en via
Shohreh (2016-07-02 20:43:56+00:00): Oui mais pourquoi trois relations "via"?

https://s31.postimg.org/bxo0j3y97/OSM_Malakoff_trois_relations_via.jpg
trial (2016-07-02 20:53:42+00:00): simplement parce que tu as 3 relations.
Tu peux :
- aller du nord de la rue Étienne Dolet *via* le feu à l'ouest de la rue Guy Môquet
- aller de l'ouest de la rue Guy Môquet *via* le feu au sud  de la rue Étienne Dolet
- aller du sud de la rue Étienne Dolet *via* le feu à l'est de la rue Guy Môquet
Ce sont trois choses différentes et les panneaux ne sont d'ailleurs pas sur le même feu.
Shohreh (2016-07-02 20:59:50+00:00): Ok merci. Ça se décante petit à petit.

Je vois mal des cyclistes lambdas entrer ce genre d'info pourtant utile pour que les routeurs calculent un itinéraire :-/
trial (2016-07-02 21:21:16+00:00): voir ma toute dernière réponse sur la liste.
maraf24 (2016-07-02 22:13:00+00:00): To jest schronisko, ale w górach.
A schronisko św. Brata Alberta to już na mapie jest i to od dawna.
borewicz (2016-07-03 10:14:19+00:00): z tego co wiem to sklep z częściami oraz usługi
maraf24 (2016-07-03 10:44:16+00:00): Ja tam widzę - "Naprawa i serwis AGD" - nic tu nie ma o zakupach części.
highflyer74 (2016-07-03 15:18:11+00:00): Hola y bienvenidos a OSM!

Me di cuenta de que ha agregado cierta información a OSM, que es buena. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que, con el fin de hacer que los datos de utilidad para otras personas, hay que etiquetar los objetos según la wiki de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). De lo contrario, las entradas no pueden ser leídos por el software usando la base de datos de OSM. El esquema de etiquetado OSM está en Inglés.

Si tienes alguna pregunta, no dude en preguntar!

Todo lo mejor,

highflyer74

Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database. The OSM tagging scheme is in English.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!

All the best,

highflyer74
Mabakay (2016-07-03 12:38:32+00:00): Tak wygląda to na ulicy - https://s31.postimg.org/k1nefss0b/argument.jpg
maraf24 (2016-07-03 13:10:55+00:00): Ok, poprawiłem.
Problem będzie jednak istniał poza OSM, widać to choćby na https://mapa.targeo.pl/Mapa_Polski,18,19.3316454,51.7449919?l=43a3da74f1cf6f30
Mabakay (2016-07-03 13:26:40+00:00): Oni wszyscy pewnie opierają się w większości na danych gminnych. Do targeo i mapy map też już to zgłaszałem, ale z żadnego nikt się nie odezwał i nic się nie zmieniło przez ponad rok.
Mabakay (2016-07-03 13:27:52+00:00): Z resztą takie przypadki tylko utwierdzają użytkowników że OSM jest lepsze :-)
Geography Canada (2016-07-03 13:55:42+00:00): Thank you for reverting it, I think I made a mistake. Cree, Inuktitut, and Inuinnaqtun are only official in NWT and Nunavut.
MMN-o (2016-07-03 09:53:13+00:00): Ah, memorial! Tror det finns någon motsvarande längs Rådhusesplanaden som jag lade till. Fixar direkt!
5m4u9 (2016-07-03 06:35:24+00:00): Thanks!
Warin61 (2016-07-06 09:21:45+00:00): Way: 402805211 Appears to be property boundary for Dangar Island. 

Way: Dangar Island (172544584) -part of multipolygon Hawesbury river. 

Relation: Dangar Island (6039000) uses way 402805211 ... this duplicates the above way feature. 

------------------
To remove the duplicate (chose which?) remove the tags name=Dangar Island, place=island ... I'd leave the way behind as it is probably used by something...
muralito (2016-07-03 00:46:45+00:00): Hola. El tourism=information es para mapear oficinas de turismo u otros lugares donde podes obtener informacion turistica.

Ademas tambien hay un etiquetado para la navegacion. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Tag_Values y mapas que lo usan como el openseamap.
user_4547543 (2017-01-04 20:59:45+00:00): Vinoteca Suarez Roig is located Diag. 74 between calle 5 and calle 42.
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-03 01:59:12+00:00): DWKB 99.3
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-03 02:45:37+00:00): 99.3
paul1928 (2016-12-04 04:05:47+00:00): It's difficult to spot from the road due to the sharp drop-off, but the track is definitely there and clear to see.
nevw (2016-12-04 06:37:07+00:00): This section should be added back in if present in any form, even if overgrown. It appears to be a connection between ways. There are plenty of tags to add that describe path visibility. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
nevw (2016-12-05 02:15:22+00:00): highway=path was missing from way and has been re-added on local survey advice from paul1928.
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-03 03:33:05+00:00): DWHA 1287 KHZ
Commodoortje (2016-08-24 22:59:11+00:00): Hoi Alkmaarder,

Ik kwam vandaag een note tegen dat er een aantal huizen bijgekomen waren. 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/686645
Ook zag ik dat jij al een aantal huizen had ingetekend.

Je benoemt de cadastrale grens per perceel landuse=residential , deze tagging is niet gebruikelijk op OSM vandaar dat ik je vraag om de reden van deze losse residentials.
Mocht je vragen hebben kun je me altijd bereiken via deze changeset.
Je mag natuurlijk ook een vraag op het forum plaatsen.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Ik ben zo vrij geweest om de gebouwen te voorzien van BAG data, inclusief adresnodes.

Mocht je geen reactie geven, dan zal ik deze landuse=residentials oplossing in het forum bespreken.
Commodoortje (2016-08-24 23:17:06+00:00): Bij nader inzien kan het zijn dat de BAG in deze gemeente achter loopt.
De huizen zonder adresnode staan namelijk nog geheel niet in de BAG (ook niet als vergunning aangevraagd)
.
Ik neem aan dat jij de lokale situatie kent? Staan hier in werkelijkheid al huizen?
mueschel (2016-07-04 20:28:46+00:00): Hi,
you put the tag "lanes:width=12ft" on several ways. this key is not in use anywhere else. Commonly either the full width (e.g. width = 24ft) or the width per lane using the :lanes suffix is tagged (e.g. width:lanes:12ft|12ft). Maybe you want to change that.
Cheers, Jan
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-03 04:26:45+00:00): DZIA 88.9 FM
smaprs (2016-08-04 18:25:49+00:00): Lucas, estas grandes áreas de mata (natural=wood) estão seguindo qual contorno?  
Rios, acidentes geográficos, parques, alguma outra marcação de limites?  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428834239/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428833977/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428833559/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428833668/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423934204/history