piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:12:39+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality in the ground. It will be reverted along with other similar changesets in the area.
radiotrefoil (2022-09-04 05:26:19+00:00): Beat me to it!
BTW, If you're mapping around Mortdale, I'm adding a lot of 360 imagery to Mapillary that you might find useful.
Luis Catalá (2022-09-03 01:47:22+00:00): Added comic/collectibles store
danieldegroot2 (2022-11-07 19:46:22+00:00): Hey shashp,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133257578/history
Based on Mapillary (2021), the vehicle restrictions you added do not seem to be explicitly signed.

Did you survey this location in person? If so, were they explicitly signed nearby?

Do these restrictions apply in both directions?

Do they apply only to the bridge or to more parts of the road?

Fyi, the value "no" is default for "motor_vehicle" on cycleways and similarly "yes" for residential.
Removed default, redundant values here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128611275
( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128611275 )
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128611421
( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128611421 )

Learn more about Access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125720387

Regards,

Daniel
shashp (2022-11-07 20:20:35+00:00): Hi Daniel, 

Yes, I tagged it with local because I was there in person filling in the details, is there another way to indicate it? Yes there’s signage for the restrictions I added. Bikes and peds are meant to use the trail path only as the bridge is very narrow single car at a time.

Yes they apply in both directions. They apply to slightly more than the bridge where you must get onto the foot/bike path.

Default values being replaced by explicit values should indicate somebody spent the time to mark it explicitly, not just accept the defaults from whatever app they’re assuming was correct.

Hope this helps to clarify.

Cheers,
Shash
danieldegroot2 (2022-11-08 22:01:09+00:00): It's usually indicated with "survey" if it's recent.

I've re-added the values here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128659366
shashp (2022-11-08 23:30:48+00:00): Oh I didn’t realize that I should be using survey instead. Do you know what local is meant for? Is there a resource that can help me find out?
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:18:52+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality on the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.
Tatfahren (2022-09-09 04:21:39+00:00): Das Gebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091444515 wurde bereits vor einigen Monaten abgerissen, ist aber glaube ich noch nicht in den Luftbildern drin. Entfernst du das, oder soll ich das machen wenn ich wieder Zuhause bin?
Makkaroni_100 (2022-09-11 18:31:26+00:00): Habs wieder weg gemacht. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und sry.
Makkaroni_100 (2022-09-11 18:31:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126060570
Tatfahren (2022-09-11 18:35:18+00:00): Kein Problem, kann man ja schlecht wissen.
user_8466505 (2022-09-03 03:48:54+00:00): Thank you for your assistance!
Horza (2022-09-03 03:28:06+00:00): Added trees around US 17
user_5359 (2022-09-04 10:01:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9945337855. what is the meaning of the tag Sesimbra = (Terminal)?
user_5359 (2022-09-20 09:10:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9996503816 (one of three nodes). What is the meaning of the tags
DESC = TITIK BATAS DESA GADUNG-TOBOALI
NAMOBJ = SIMPANG JALAN GUNUNG NAMAK LAMA
?
orthocircular (2022-09-03 08:24:14+00:00): Hi Bridget, please do not undo changes without talking about it. The description and image tags you're using are spammy and won't help anything, and the "categoery=psychic" tag will do nothing for you: not only is it misspelled, it's also just not an openstreetmap tag. I want your business to show up for customers just as much as you do, and that's why I changed it the way I did. Please look at wiki.openstreetmap.org for guidelines on how to tag things and other rules that editors must adhere to.
bxl-forever (2022-09-03 15:16:27+00:00): Hello,

I am not quite sure what "a non-excited building" actually means.

Sure, the building structure had incorrect tags (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113405487/history) but it should have been kept and tagged as building=pedestal, with the statue on top (layer=1).  The "building" is in fact the small pedestal under the statue, it has its own reference number in UrbIS and is used for many things, e.g. calculation of built surfaces in the Region.  Most statues and busts have such a "building" with them.

I suggest you undelete it (do not create a new one).
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:11:13+00:00): The plinth is not a building so far ad i know
johnstonsnmi (2022-09-03 05:41:44+00:00): Forgot to add source=survey
user_5359 (2022-09-03 06:04:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SPAM entry, because the mostly foreign keys. Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for more informations.
user_5359 (2022-09-04 09:48:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1091500545. what is the meaning of the foreign tags
Keliling_K = 62.215
Luas_Km2 = 88.09
admin_leve = 7
fid = 1
full_id = r6633878
?
Why did you need a reference to a relation instead to add this way to the relation?
user_2066394 (2022-09-03 06:48:41+00:00): Wo ist die Parkfläche?
ivanbranco (2022-09-03 15:44:10+00:00): Ciao Pasquale,

perché non utilizzi start_date=2022-08 invece di start_date=Agosto 2022, come ti avevo già suggerito nel changeset/125406479?
In questo modo il valore sarebbe machine-readable (e quindi utilizzabile dalle varie applicazioni, o vuoi aggiungere valori che non verranno utilizzati?) o anche solo human-readable da utenti non italiani.

Il problema viene segnalato anche da Osmose: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/it/issue/d207d909-88f3-cdf0-781e-da1f1c5385ef

ti è stato consigliato come attivare i flag di Osmose da un altro utente (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125536413), puoi seguire il consiglio per piacere? Matera è disseminata di errori mai corretti, e ne continuano ad essere aggiunti di nuovi
orthocircular (2022-09-03 08:18:38+00:00): Hi, this changeset did not correct the payment notation.

It removed a valid addr:country tag, an invalid "categoery" tag, a verbose description, an unnecessary image, a valid 
payment:debit_cards tag, and fixed an invalid addr:street tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125723784
user_5359 (2022-09-03 09:08:22+00:00): Upps, forget to correct the starting point of editing. See https://osm.org/changeset/125728262
user4816003805 (2022-09-05 17:51:18+00:00): Hi Dogman15,

You might take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

Thanks for trying to fix https://osm.org/node/4468299590/history, but it was originally an "amenity=fast_food", not a "shop=deli".
In JOSM you can check the history of an object using "Control+H", but I'm not sure what the equivalent in iD is. =/

There was also another Lee's Deli that was accidentally changed in https://osm.org/changeset/125395289, but I've fixed it and a few others in https://osm.org/changeset/125757505.
user_5359 (2022-09-04 09:52:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1091505810. What is the meaning of the foreign tags
DBTMAX = 0.0
DESC = Bentang Alam tanda Batas Desa Gadung - Desa Kaposang
KLSSNG = 0
LENGTH_KM = 4.34
NAMOBJ = AIK INAS
REMARK = Sungai Satu Garis
SHAPE_Leng = 4.34105029122
SLPRT = 0.0
TIPSNG = 0
WMAX = 0.0
?
What is the source and the license of this data?
PLEASE stop using foreign, not discussed keys!
silversurfer83 (2022-09-03 19:51:46+00:00): Hallo Dirk
An dieser Stelle der freundliche Hinweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2022-09-03 07:22:17+00:00): Hallöchen :)
Wie ich das sehe ist schon für den Gesamtkomplex der Name "Klärwerk Lamerden" eingetragen. Daher halte ich es für unnötig bis fast falsch an dieses einzelne Gebäude auch den Namen "Kläranlage" zu heften. Der Wert "building" könnte da ggf. geändert werden. "industrial" wäre da eine Möglichkeit. Oder "service". Aber bitte den Namen wieder entfernen. 

-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125724291
user_5359 (2022-09-05 06:22:58+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag Nom Arabe = مخبزة السنوسي ? Did you mean the tag name:ar = مخبزة السنوسي ?
user_5359 (2022-09-03 12:18:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9996652511. what is the meaning of the foreign tags 
ELEV_Mdpl = 182
Name = Bt. Gadung
REMARK = Bukit
?
Enock4seth (2022-09-11 14:42:17+00:00): Putting "Mapped buildings" before all those hashtags is much more useful. 

Alos, kindly stop adding "addr:city=Boadi" to buildings
Adababu Godswill (2022-09-11 17:01:39+00:00): Well noted.
Thank you for the prompt.
nevw (2022-09-05 07:01:52+00:00): Hi, a problem here with the mapping.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10906&lat=-27.52181&zoom=15
Tech Dec (2022-09-06 04:12:13+00:00): Thanks nevw. I've fixed my error here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125837276
monotar (2022-10-17 23:33:23+00:00): wieder ein Changeset in dem unnötig Abbiegerelationen gelöscht wurden. Das kann doch nicht wahr sein, nun ist die ganze Gegend von Wurzen bis Geithain mit vollkommen falschen Kreuzungen gespickt.
Oskarst_ (2026-06-19 07:01:32+00:00): Hei,

Ser ikke ut til at det er vanlig å tagge stier hvor det sykles som cycling tracks. Ser ut til at dette er forbeholdt der man sykler "on dedicated infrastructure", .f.eks. et innendørs anlegg eller en pumptrack. Jeg har ikke erfaring med å gjøre noe annet enn å kartlegge det som path, med eventuelt en mtb:scale
berland (2026-07-08 11:14:08+00:00): Flere av stiene på Stendafjellet har oppbygde ramper og annen utforsyklinginfrastruktur, og er ellers unaturlige å gå/løpe for de som ikke sykler. Jeg tror det var på bakgrunn av at noe faktisk er bygget her som gjorde at jeg tagget det som jeg gjorde.
Oskarst_ (2026-07-08 12:19:13+00:00): Skjønner! Ser likevel betydelig bruk av turgåere eller løpere i Strava heatmap, noe som kan indikere at stiene også blir brukt til fots. Har i tråd med tag i f.eks. Hafjell bike park tagget stiene som highway = path. Eventuelle mtb tags krever mer inngående kjennskap til de ulike stiene enn jeg har.
user_5359 (2022-09-05 06:16:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the foreign tag KUMON SAMPAGUITA AVE (HOLY SPIRIT) CTR = KUMON SAMPAGUITA AVE CENTER (#35 SAMPAGUITA AVE).
Please separate also housenumber (addr:housenumber) and street (addr:street).
richieca (2022-09-05 07:54:01+00:00): how to i edit?
adiatmad (2022-09-05 08:50:06+00:00): @richieca : You can simply use iD Editor on your browser (https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/) and change the tag
ivanbranco (2022-09-03 15:28:44+00:00): Ciao, perché aggiungere il tag building=yes al nodo dell'indirizzo? Il building è già stato mappato separatamente come area.
Anton Khorev (2022-09-04 21:55:05+00:00): You are probably trying to add addresses for buildings that already exist and want to have several addresses inside one building.

Since you also use Vespucci app, it's going to be easier to add such addresses with Vespucci's address button ( https://vespucci.io/help/en/Node%20selected/#add-address-tags ).

If you still want to add addresses with the "House" button of Every Door app you'll have to indicate every time that this is an address and not a building. To do so, after entering the housenumber press "More" at the bottom of the form, then press "Building" > "...", then press "<empty>".
nikospag (2022-09-03 11:21:56+00:00): Μην αλλάζεις το classification των οδών σε παρακαλώ. Δεν είμαστε βλάκες εμείς που το είχαμε Secondary.
eggie (2022-09-03 08:13:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-09-05 06:14:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1090216133, http://www.osm.org/way/237106633. What is the meaning of the key Gymnasium.
SLMapper (2023-09-05 09:12:50+00:00): Hi, ist dort wirklich (noch) ein Parkplatz? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3872365
user_8101879 (2022-09-04 17:37:54+00:00): Hi,

a waterway relation is not a collection of all elements of a river but a collection of unclosed ways, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relation:waterway where you will find only the roles main_stream, side_stream, tributary and spring (not source) and no waterbody roles.
The wiki page in english is also interesting : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-24 16:05:52+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as ajouté sur cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625659874/history un school:FR=Primaire.

Pour moi ici FR se réfère plutôt au système éducatif en France et sans doute que c'est davantage un school:BE qui devrait être renseigné non ?

bonne carto
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-24 16:06:21+00:00): il y a un https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/school%3ABE%3Afr
Marcos Dione (2022-09-03 10:18:27+00:00): Sorry for this biggie :( It's difficult to remember which edits ion OsmAnd are bunched together.
ivanbranco (2022-09-03 15:30:32+00:00): Ciao Pasquale,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091533063

questa way è senza tag, riesci a sistemarla?

Buon mapping
rik_ (2022-09-05 07:17:34+00:00): Hallo,

statt Löschen von zugewachsenen Wegen bietet sich oft die Verwendung eines "Lifecycle"-Tags an. Hier wäre z. B. `abandoned:highway=track` geeignet. So bleibt der zeitliche Verlauf erhalten, ohne dass der ehemalige Weg noch einen Einfluss auf Kartendarstellung, Routing oder sonstige Anwendungen hat.

Im Wiki ist alles genau beschrieben, vielleicht ist das ja interessant: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
b-jazz (2022-09-06 02:54:13+00:00): Why did https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704190233 get rotated and jumbled up?
whammo (2022-09-12 20:11:26+00:00): I don't think I had touched that house when you commented....although I have fixed it since. Thanks.
b-jazz (2022-09-13 18:30:41+00:00): Thanks for the fix. Sorry for the misplaced accusation.
Falsernet (2022-09-04 03:11:42+00:00): Hi! Have you considered tagging the build date using start_date, e.g. "start_date=1995"?
no details provided here (2022-09-04 09:18:31+00:00): Thank you!  Good call and I'll do that from now on.  I'm learning.
Falsernet (2022-09-05 19:40:08+00:00): No worries, glad I could help :)
martien-176 (2022-09-03 15:50:49+00:00): Hi, i commented on one of your earlier changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125568505), asking to stick to mappings of the required features.

Now i notice you mapped here tracks, waterways, barriers. These are not required in this project.

You mapped them quite well, that is not the problem. But all these extra objects will complicate the validation of the project and therefor slow down the completion of it.

This is hurting the humanitarian efforts and thus the vulnerable people on the ground. 

Remember, this is urgent disaster mapping.

Please wait with mapping these extra features until the project is finished.

Thanks for your cooperation and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125728026
woodpeck (2022-09-03 18:48:42+00:00): Martien, please do not discourage people from mapping. What you have done here runs 100% against what OpenStreetMap is for. If HOT cannot accept OpenStreetMap's values then HOT must find another database, and stop using OpenStreetMap. Please stop giving your project participants instructions that are detrimental to the goals of OpenStreetMap.
javbw (2022-09-03 22:07:22+00:00): - the barriers are walls around grouped structures. This makes them easier to identify when these HOT maps are printed out (which seems to be a common way I see them used) 
- waterways are barriers to access. I know with floods there is water everywhere, but canals and water features are even more of a barrier to any effort to reach the structure. These present barriers to rural access - so many roads stop and do not connect across them. 

- waterways help others map bridges accurately accurate bridges are absolutely necessary. So many bridges are missing. 

- I map tracks where I see the ways as tracks. These tracks are often the “driveways” for these remote structures. Mapping everything as a minor road causes clutter and confusion. 

I map in rural Japan, and access to remote farming structures in the middle of a wide irrigation system is confusing and difficult if mapped badly. 

I am the one validating. As of 6 hrs ago I am the #1 validator on the project. I clean up and add these additional features to ensure that it is mapped to the minimal standard to my tastes *usually* during my validation. 

***this is the way that I feel I am helping these people***

- I am aware that I don’t always follow the letter of the rules for HOT mapping, but I am following the spirit of HOT mapping in general. I am helping in the way I feel is useful, and that help is not slowing your validation or other mapping efforts. 

Please stop and consider your words and statements more carefully in the future. I think your positions are unreasonable or untrue.  

-Javbw
martien-176 (2022-09-05 17:44:49+00:00): Hi Javbw, if you feel the project requirements are not sufficient/incomplete please be so kind to discuss that in the open. The project chat is your best option. Not doing so could confuse other mappers/validators. In the end, it is always HOT project management who decides the requirements.

Woodpeck, it was not my intention to discourage people to map. My apologies if my words did suggest that. 

But please view my remarks in the context of an urgent HOT project for a disaster happening right now, to be completed asap. Mapping non required features takes time. It can complicate mapping/validation for others in the project. As a result this might slow down the completion of it.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-05 17:53:16+00:00): @martien-176 For the avoidance of doubt, you're writing this in a discussion of a changeset on the OpenStreetMap platform. If some other project can make use of that - great, but please don't assume that work here is being done exclusively for your organiaation.
martien-176 (2022-09-06 08:53:46+00:00): SomeoneElse, fair enough, you are right. In hindsight i should have started this discussion better on the tasking manager.

Regards, Martien
javbw (2022-09-06 10:40:41+00:00): I don’t think you should have started it at all. 

- I didn’t slow down your validation - I was the one validating. 
- I was mapping as I normally do, which was not unusual. 
- I was mapping as I thought was helpful to the HOT task - not the bare minimum required. Apparently this is absolutely forbidden. 

- I was validating large sections and cleaning up other mapper’s errors as well. I thought this was helpful. 

But drawing some waterways is a big deal and somehow worthy of your time to comment. 

I don’t want to be around such micro-managers.

When you type “regards,” I don’t think you have considered that the *only* actual communication from a project lead I have ever received HOT mapping has been a complaint - about mapping too many useful things. 

*sigh*
pedrito1414 (2022-09-06 15:38:52+00:00): Hi all, I would like to try and take some of the heat out of this conversation by providing a bit of context... I'll also post to the HOT mailing list on this topic, too as I think there are things we can discuss more broadly and learn from...

Also want to acknowledge that martien-176 is a very committed and active HOT volunteer and does a ton of validation (as well as being on HOT WGs for data quality and training). He cares about the quality of the data going into OSM and then being used by responders. javbw, it also clear that you are a committed contributor to OSM and mapping for humanitarian purposes. 

There a couple of relevant reasons that validators of mapping done through the TM tend to ask people to stick to the requirements asked for in the project...

Firstly, at least in part a response to valid criticism from other OSM community members, that without trying to constrain (through project instructions and validation feedback) what people map, we often end up with inconsistency across the geographical area. For example, clumps of roads that don't connect to a wider network or an isolated length of river in the middle of nowhere. 

Secondly, if an inexperienced mapper contributes to an urgent task and decides to map features that they have no experience in and maps them wrong, it does then take validator time to rectify this and we do try to make sure that in mapping following crises we help create data useful to responders as quickly as possible.

Having said that, javbw does know what they're doing (and was validating simultaneously) and so these lessons from experience may not apply. 

I think the wording of martien'-176's original changeset comment above wasn't perfect, but the intent wasn't bad and he apologised if his meaning was misconstrued. We'll take this issue back into the validator community in HOT and discuss to see how we can improve our process and the way in which we engage mappers...

javbw, I hope this doesn't discourage for you from future humanitarian mapping - as someone who worked at MSF for many years,  I can tell you it is much appreciated. If you didn't catch the MSF talk at State of the Map, I would recommend the recording when it is published.
pitfire (2022-09-03 09:43:28+00:00): Hallo Frankie43,
Betr.: Fahrschule Starkmann (392017016, v5), bist Du sicher, driving_school und shop=clothes in einem Laden POI
Frankie43 (2022-09-03 10:21:01+00:00): Nur Fahrschule Starkmann.
Frankie43 (2022-09-03 10:22:12+00:00): Shop-Clothes existiert nicht mehr.
ivanbranco (2022-10-13 09:41:23+00:00): Ciao, hai aggiunto un'area di sosta per automobilisti, ma qua passano solo ciclisti secondo quanto mappato, cosa volevi descrivere?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:27:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9996939984/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
martien-176 (2022-09-03 15:28:16+00:00): You requested a review of your mappings.

Thanks for contributing.

You mapped most of the buildings quite well. 

In a few cases however you mapped an area surrounded by walls as a building. In that case look for the shadows inside the rectangle of the structure. It indicates it is a wall or fence that looks like a building from above.

Thanks and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125729400
charles chilufya (2022-09-03 15:40:20+00:00): thanks for feedback. could be imagery view from my side or i used 2D view not 3 eyes. however, i appreciate your feedback.
charles chilufya (2022-09-03 15:40:44+00:00): hope you corrected that error caused
Nearby0051 (2022-09-03 12:17:39+00:00): Hi,
Why have you removed information about the streets? (Lanes, Speed limits)
pitfire (2022-09-04 04:53:11+00:00): Hallo Frankie43,

Betr.:Knotenverlauf: Schuhwerk (1456042420).
Was ist nun in dem Gebäude, ein Schuster oder eine office=newspaper, oder beides?
mk2k22 (2022-09-05 08:12:09+00:00): Hi, 

thanks for the new POI additions to Ljubljana. Please note that several of those had already existed before, which resulted in duplicate entries, some of which I have now removed. I noticed you used OsmAnd to add the new POIs, but usually OsmAnd only updates once a month (in the free version at least), so it seems the September update wasn't yet available at the time you uploaded new POIs. 

Please can you first check the OSM page next time before submitting new POIs so to avoid duplicate entries?

Thanks!