piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyton (2022-04-03 13:20:11+00:00): moin, ich würd gern die daten der kita abspalten und an die fläche des flurstücks tun, wie weit geht das da nach hinten? bis zum park an der goebenstraße?

als was wurde das haus ursprünglich erbaut? als kindergarten?
cyton (2022-04-03 13:23:27+00:00): ich würd dann auch glöeich den hausumring verfeinern, der ist noch von OSM-Bot, der hat ja allerhand seltsamen kram gemacht, und jetzt haben wir ja die alkis daten, die sind genauer
a_d_s (2022-04-03 13:25:43+00:00): Das Gelände des Kindergartens geht bis hinten zur Goebenstraße, ja. Da ist eine Wiese dahinter die als Spielplatz verwendet wird, ist von der Straße aus zu sehen. Da sind Zäune links und rechts, weiß aber nicht ob man die gut sehen kann.

Mir ist nicht bekannt als was das Haus gebaut wurde.
cyton (2022-04-03 13:40:02+00:00): danke.
ich glaub du hast amenity=childcare gesetzt, weil iD das vorgeschlagen hat, das ist leider so und trotzdem falsch.
InsertUser (2022-03-22 22:02:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your changes don't mention a source for the name. Is this from local knowledge?
Jonathan Stubbs (2022-03-25 23:07:57+00:00): Yes, I live here and go here quite often.
Warin61 (2022-03-21 22:51:46+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

I am a bit puzzled by the node with the name 'Mayfair Property Group' umm other than the address .. it does not say what it is ... a real estate agent? The property owner? 

-------------------------
There are more than one way of doing things... 
I prefer to have the buildings as individual entries into OSM ... and than map the shops etc as nodes within the buildings.  This matches the OSM 'guide' of 'one feature = one OSM entry'. Others put them all together as you have done. 

Have fun, map what you enjoy.
archpdx (2022-03-21 03:02:48+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding this road name! However, please note that we don't abbreviate road names in OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation

For example, this should be named 'Sunnyhill Lane' instead of 'Sunnyhill Ln'
Gerrit (2022-03-21 16:46:14+00:00): OK.  Thanks for the feedback.  Made the change as suggested.
zyphlar (2022-03-21 06:31:02+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your contribution! FYI the Source tag belongs on your changeset, not the map item (fencing academy) itself. Otherwise looks good and thanks again!
rene78 (2022-03-21 04:23:49+00:00): Need some time to clean up this changeset. Please don't delete empty nodes.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mikeho (2022-05-21 16:54:33+00:00): Hallo Lukas 458,
ich versuche railway=switch nachzutaggen wo erforderlich. Dabei bin ich auf das "merkwürdige" Gleisbild von D'dorf-Bilk gestoßen. Darf ich Dich bitten, Railway=switch an den nodes nachzutaggen, wo Weichen sind / sein werden? Danke und viele Grüße 
Michael (mikeho)
user_3022894 (2022-05-22 11:14:39+00:00): Hi Michael,
jaaa, ist ok, kann man so machen. Das Ding ist hier halt, dass aufgrund des Fehlens eines aktuellen Luftbildes die Existenz bzw. genaue Lage der Weichen noch nicht 100%ig klar sind, aber es stimmt natürlich schon, da wo in OSM ein Gleis im Form einer Weiche vom andern abzweigt, sollte natürlich ein railway=switch her. Sorry, da hatte ich welche vergessen, einzutragen. Habe die fehlenden eingefügt.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
mikeho (2022-05-23 20:21:22+00:00): Hi Lukas, 
fein, danke, dann finden mein Tool die ungetagten Weichen bald nicht mehr ... 
Viele Grüße
archpdx (2022-11-25 23:07:31+00:00): Hi,

It looks like this changeset and adds nodes without any tags such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9593390002

I also noticed that this changeset adds building=yes to all address. Some of these addresses, however, don't have any buildings (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9593389981) or already have their own building area (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9593389825). Ideally, the building tags from these addresses should be removed and/or merged with their respective building.
Hungerburg (2022-03-21 09:52:34+00:00): Das sieht auch mehr nach einer Zufahrt aus als nach "Anliegerstraßen …, die Siedlungsgebiete erschließen und nur unerheblichen Durchgangsverkehr haben. "
Rider_gang (2022-03-21 13:14:12+00:00): Danke für den Vorschlag, Hungerburg. Ich habe die Klassifikation auf service umgestellt.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 05:16:46+00:00): What's the purpose of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042118100
eggie (2022-03-21 06:41:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 
Alle begin is moeilijk.. Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. 
Wanneer er sparke van een tunnel is kan deze nooit een verbinding hebben met de bovenliggende Turnhoutsebaan.
Met access=no zet je de tunnel op slot. Voor wie? 
Verder loopt de tnnel een paarkeer heen en weer.
Je edits.. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-21 06:50:16+00:00): reverted by changeset #118720627
eggie (2022-03-21 06:55:29+00:00): Je veranderingen zijn teruggedraaid. Het is nu weer zoals het was. De tunnel stond al correct in OSM. 
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-21 06:46:59+00:00): Het lijkt zo simpel.. Wat was je bedoeling?

Dit zijn je edits..  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118719678

Alles ligt dubbelgeklapt.. Ooka access=no kan niet goed zijn. Dat is een verbod voor iedereen. 
Ik draai even het e.e.a. weer terug.. 
Dan zijn we weer terug bij af. 
Je moet straks maar weer even kijken hoe het er dan weer uit ziet. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-21 06:48:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #118720596
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 04:00:20+00:00): Hi,

In the future, please try not to delete the old way, and instead reuse it. This helps mappers understand how things have changed better.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118720125
abvincen (2022-03-25 13:29:35+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback.
Going ahead, i'll ensure to modify and reuse the old-way instead of deleting it.
Thank you for the insights, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118720125
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2022-03-21 07:27:58+00:00): Dag Elian .. Je vraagt feedback.  De parkeerplaats is correct gemapt.
De laadpaal zal geen naam hebben.
name= Meerkoet kan denk ik beter weg.
Voor aanvullingen van bij een laadpaal zie..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-21 07:35:37+00:00): Áanvulling..  'k Zag dat de fietspaden niet verbonden waren met de Jan Benninghweg..  Ik heb die nu verbonden.
eggie (2022-03-21 08:24:53+00:00): Dat had te maken met de edits van een voorgaande mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100927919

Maar het zal in ieder geval weer routeren voor fietsers. 
gr eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-21 13:07:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't believe, that you are able to accept all world wide possible payments.
Warin61 (2022-03-21 22:37:27+00:00): area=yes is not required for multiplygon members.
AndrewS (2022-03-21 23:32:27+00:00): How did you find those errors? I can't see how OSMI shows them and an overpass query for area=yes only shows a few that aren't in that changeset. (I am an expert at neither)
Warin61 (2022-03-22 08:02:14+00:00): OSMI showed an area problem that I fixed ... these seem to occur from time to time .. many with Id. 

While I was fixing that I noted the area=yes tag .. JOSM validator will flag these .. possibly a \warning' rather than an 'error'. It is just something that you don't need to do, waste of time doing it.
AndrewS (2022-03-22 08:40:12+00:00): I sometimes start an area with a line and then want to convert the finished closed way to an area. The quickest way is to add the area=yes tag AFAIK. Which seems to be okay unless you then add it to a relation. iD warns by marking the internal of the way gray - and I didn't realise why until you just pointed it out.
Warin61 (2022-03-22 10:11:58+00:00): A closed way is an area if it is any number of things e.g. leisure=pitch, amenity=parking, building=*, natural=wood etc etc.. None of these would require area=yes. Simply - area=yes is, in most cases, not required.
AndrewS (2022-03-22 13:47:38+00:00): I'm guessing that my comments are specific to the iD editor. I'm not familiar with JOSM, but in iD when the 'area' tool is used to create geometries only the area preset tags are available (eg "natural wood" creates a natural=wood tag); likewise only linear tags are available with the line tool. If the line tool is inadvertently used to create a closed way and area presets are required then it has to be first converted to an area by adding an area=yes tag. The end result is the same as it looks like the area=yes tag disappears once the area feature is assigned (unless its part of a relation, it seems). See this issue thread: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/27594/can-you-change-a-closed-line-into-an-area
ivanatora (2022-03-22 06:19:20+00:00): Защо премахваш уточняващите  тагове за адреси и кадастриални данни? Примерно https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469477581
Dimitar155 (2022-03-21 11:59:49+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118732835
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
limes11 (2022-03-21 19:48:52+00:00): Hi, 

nur zur Info: Ein highway=footway braucht kein foot=designated. Das ist bereits inkludiert. Für's nächste Mal. 

Beste Grüße, Limes
Michael Heinisch (2022-03-22 06:53:26+00:00): Hallo Limes, alles klar, besten Dank für Deine Belehrung. Ich versuche nur, auffällige Fehler in der OSM zu korrigieren. VG Michael
eggie (2022-03-21 07:30:03+00:00): Dag foo_bar   'k Denk opening_hours:covid19= same kan nu beter weg. Er zijn geen beperkingen. 
MVG
eggie
foo_bar (2022-03-21 07:34:29+00:00): Prima, ik heb het weggehaald. Bedankt voor de feedback.
JochenOSM (2022-03-21 12:12:51+00:00): Hallo 17martin10, warum dürfen Fußgänger dort nicht laufen?
17martin10 (2022-03-22 17:45:27+00:00): Meines Wissens steht da ein Verbotsschild für Fußgänger. Ich kann das aber nochmal überprüfen
ralley (2022-03-21 08:06:18+00:00): What is your source for the cafe?  It does not match the aerial imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118721604
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:49:57+00:00): Changing roads to cartpaths is considered vandalism and will be reported
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118721614
喵耳引力波 (2022-03-21 07:57:48+00:00): 这是我的第666个变更集，献给OAE的这个BUG了
MarinoBM (2022-03-21 10:47:46+00:00): Gracias por su esfuerzo para mejorar el mapa en España.
La fuente oficial de imágenes de satélite en España es PNOA, que está mejor
geolocalizada que Bing.
DianaDemchuk (2022-03-21 10:51:46+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. In priority, we use PNOA, but they are not always loaded (depending on the location)!
Ducki (2022-11-19 17:55:04+00:00): Hi OMME-OSM!
Kurze Frage: die Michelshöhe ist nur ein Restaurant und manchmal Event-Location. Dort wohnt aber niemand. Ist das Absicht, dass Du das als Wohngebiet deklariert hast?

Gruß :)
Alex
MacLondon (2022-03-23 00:42:40+00:00): Hi. I've changed Vallentin Road to oneway=no.

The road has new a 'no entry' restriction at its west end (buses + cycles are exempted). This is already set as a pair of turn restrictions.

General motorists can still enter at the east end of the road, travel westwards almost to the end of the road and then do a u-turn and exit the same way they entered.
amanura (2022-03-24 06:18:59+00:00): Hi MacLondon, 

Thanks for pointing this out to me. I happened to miss checking the Turn restrictions and hence I have turned the street to a one-way. Apologies for the miss and thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the community. 

Best Regards,
amanura.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 05:11:02+00:00): All your changes have been reverted. Please only map what's "on the ground" and map the correct shape.
Danysan95 (2022-06-07 18:40:51+00:00): Ottimo lavoro. Segnalo che il tratto a nord con layer=1 si incrociava con alcuni ponti anche loro con layer=1. Inoltre il tratto sotterrato a Massa Lombarda non aveva tunnel=culvert né layer=-1 quindi si incrociava con la strada. Dovrei aver risolto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122084226
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118722637
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-22 09:07:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Ci sono due modifiche in questo gruppo. Nella prima è stato spostato il vertice di un edificio di centinaia di metri. Nella seconda è stato modificato il toponimo di un alpeggio aggiungendo "Fungoland" che pare quantomai improbabile. Attendo un tuo cortese riscontro. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118722883
ralley (2022-03-21 08:05:27+00:00): What is your source for the fast food outlet you added?  It does not match the aerial imagery and the name does not look genuine.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118723176
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
parsd51 (2022-03-21 11:55:07+00:00): Hej

Der er sat removed: på objekterne, fordi de stadig er synlige på luftfoto SDFE 2021, så undgås det forhåbentlig at andre mapper dem igen.
Så lad venligst være med at fjerne dem.
Adressepunkter importeres automatisk, hvis de skal fjernes kontaktes kommunen.

Hilsen
parsd51
parsd51 (2022-03-25 12:42:27+00:00): Har du ikke læst min besked, eller….?
Svaret har du jo ikke.
Nå, jeg bliver nok træt på et tidspunkt, men adressenoderne kommer på igen ca to gange om ugen……….
jlindhart (2022-03-25 12:45:29+00:00): Beklager den sidste besked var røget i spam. Det er forstået så retter vi det bare i vores lokale data.
God weekend
user_2066394 (2022-03-21 16:34:39+00:00): Seit 2011 auf diesem Knoten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1217764222
ralley (2022-03-21 08:14:12+00:00): Please just stop - this is vandalism
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
marczoutendijk (2022-04-01 08:49:59+00:00): Hi cyberatlas,
The only changeset comment you use is: "aktualizacja".
That is what we all do, but it is much nicer for your fellow mappers if you explain a bit more what exactly  you have edit.
Please read:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

[DeepL]:  
Cześć cyberatlas,
Jedyny komentarz changeset, którego używasz, to: "aktualizacja".
To jest to, co wszyscy robimy, ale jest to o wiele milsze dla Twoich kolegów mapperów, jeśli wyjaśnisz nieco więcej, co dokładnie edytowałeś.
Proszę przeczytać:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-03-21 08:37:43+00:00): Beste Maarten..

Wanneer de bouw is afgerond ook de regel construction=house  verwijderen svp
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-21 08:43:29+00:00): De specificatie construction=house  heb ik van woningen en wegen verwijderd. 
Dr Schaepmanstr was 2x gemapt. Eén heb ik verwijderd.
gr eggie
mw8 (2022-03-21 10:04:26+00:00): Bedankt voor de aanpassingen! Ben nog nieuw met OSM dus moet nog wat dingen leren :). Waar staat die regel construction=house dan nog gespecifieerd?
eggie (2022-03-21 10:09:13+00:00): We waren allemaal ooit startende mapper moet je maar denken.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118723774
Selecteer een huis en dan zie je je eigen wijzigingen.
Die regel kwam mee met de import vanuit het Kadaster.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-03-21 10:11:48+00:00): Die editor iD die je gebruikt vind ik zelf een lastige. Je moet dan kiezen voor alle tags zichtbaar. 
Zelf gebruik ik editor JOSM.
Die is veel overzichtelijker.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Gr eggie
mw8 (2022-03-21 10:45:47+00:00): Aha, duidelijk! Hartelijk dank voor de uitleg!

Groetjes
Maarten
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 04:48:48+00:00): What are you going for here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042164397
joost schouppe (2022-03-22 07:50:10+00:00): Hey Floxes,
I'm a little confused that the access is set to "permissive" (which basically means "yes" untill the owner changes their mind) but also "locked" (which means it's usually impossible to pass the gate).
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
CoyKoi (2022-03-21 10:14:21+00:00): Hello Haoze, OpenStreetMap is for mapping real things! I can see you have added several walkways and a retail area which do not exist in real life. These should be removed, and please refrain from adding more "fake" things. If you are learning, please start with this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118763010 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724781].
Hungerburg (2022-03-21 09:43:41+00:00): Hallo Ridergang, das schaut mir mehr nach highway=service; service=driveway aus, denn nach residential.
Rider_gang (2022-03-21 13:14:30+00:00): Danke für den Vorschlag, Hungerburg. Ich habe die Klassifikation auf service umgestellt.
nevw (2022-03-21 09:44:26+00:00): You need to have a physical office to map to in OSM. If you are online only then you need to choose another mapping service  Google seems to allow online only advertising.
See this recent query on our help site…   
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72910/how-should-i-map-an-online-shopping-store
IlBano (2022-03-21 17:02:39+00:00): Buonasera Luigi e benvenuto in OSM.
Vorrei fornirti un feedback in merito agli elementi che hai editato:
- la chiesa era già presente nella mappa  sotto forma di building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473366135#map=19/45.21228/9.25631). Come regola generale non vanno mai creati duplicati dei medesimi oggetti (ovvero lì c'è una chiesa, ma dal punto di vista dei dati OSM ora ne risultano 2)
- il nome di un elemento sulla mappa non deve essere usato per descrivere l'oggetto. Nel caso della banca che hai aggiunto se non ne conosci il nome o non hai modo di rilevarlo sul campo, allora meglio non mettere nulla
- ok il percorso ciclopedonale da SP49 verso area residenziale 

Per approfondimenti su quanto sopra puoi leggere questo -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice.

Ti inviterei a rivedere in autonomia quanto segnalato sopra.

In caso di dubbi lascia pure un commento qui, oppure scrivimi via mail OSM.

Grazie

IlBano
Luigi Santangelo (2022-03-22 08:30:26+00:00): Salve IlBano, ringrazio innanzitutto per il feedback e mi scuso per la superficialità con cui ho effettuato le descrizioni. In realtà i due elementi volevano essere una "prova" per verificare il corretto funzionamento dell'integrazione con una nostra applicazione (sviluppata all'Università degli Studi di Pavia). Avrei dovuto procedere ad eliminare i due rilievi ma mi avete anticipato con i controlli :) Grazie comunque. Procedo all'eliminazione.

Buona giornata

Luigi
SpinOff (2025-09-11 22:20:20+00:00): Hej. Pamiętasz dlaczego oznaczyłeś tę ścieżkę jako highway=footway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042172384

Są tam jakieś ograniczenia dla ruchu rowerzystów?
englu (2025-09-16 07:03:59+00:00): Hej, nie pamiętam, ale patrząc na heatmapę Stravy można wnioskować, że rowerzyści nie mają tam żadnych problemów z przejazdem. Nie widziałem tej ścieżki na żywo.
SpinOff (2025-09-16 18:43:20+00:00): Pomyliłem coś w historii. Ta ścieżka została dodana jednak w tym changesecie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37973537
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-21 09:08:57+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your contribution :) Please square this building by selecting the object and pressing Q. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118725333
eggie (2022-03-21 09:23:06+00:00): Dag Chou.. Dit zijn eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen in de zin van
Je kunt aan de vlakken toevoegen ..

parking=street_side
parking:orientation=perpendicular  Dan zal de P minder prominent te zien zijn en is het correcter getagd.
Je krijgt anders een wijk vol parkeerterreinen.
MVG
eggie
Choud (2022-03-21 09:34:13+00:00): Dag Eggie, ik zal de tag aanpassen
skyper (2022-08-02 14:56:42+00:00): Hallo Sandmann4u 
In Superroute-Relationen gehören eigentlich nur Relationen als Mitglieder. Linien sind dann in den entsprechenden Mitgliederrelationen. Die Reihenfolge der Linien als Mitglieder ist wichtig, denn sie sollten eine durchgängige Strecke ergeben. Falls eine Linie nur in eine Fahrtrichtung verwendet wird braucht es die Rollen `forward` (in Richtung der Linie) oder `backward` (entgegen der Richtung der Linie).
Bitte sei vorsichtig und frag im Zweifel z.B. im Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14) nach.
iD kann ich leider für Relationen nicht empfehlen, da einige Bugs enthalten sind und die Unterstützung für etliche Relationen doch sehr mangelhaft ist.
Habe mal einiges korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124394751
Viel Grüße,
skyper