piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Cascafico (2017-11-17 21:27:50+00:00): Potresti usare anche il maiuscolo?
P.es. Pala del Todesco
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-18 12:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53900134, 53899941 where the changeset comment is: revert data that was imported again even though the user was repeatedly told not to
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-18 12:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53900134, 53899941 where the changeset comment is: revert data that was imported again even though the user was repeatedly told not to
mueschel (2017-11-18 11:23:43+00:00): Hi,
here you added the tag "mdds:code", a week ago it was "MDDS_Code". Could you change to a common spelling of the key? 
Btw, if this is kind of a reference number used by government, I'd consider "ref:mdds" as better.

Cheers, Jan
sfrank (2017-11-18 21:17:05+00:00): Hi, 
first I did not find any tag for the MDDS-code (sort of e goverment code, found in census2011 documents and others), and also only less information for village tagging in india. But then I found a (older) discussion entry https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2012-May/001630.html (from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Places)
so I changed the tag name. Is ther a better tag or more common used tag for that?
I tag most as "village". It may be changed later, if there is a well defined india tagging scheme for populated places (wiki). But at moment there are often no populated places in the map there, so I add it from available open sources. 
Btw. it is often not easy to find the correct spelling. Often you may find 2, 3 or more diffrent english spelling. I try to add all and the "official" from the census book I use for the "name" tag.
mueschel (2017-11-18 11:26:30+00:00): Hi,
all these ways do have the tags 
    Tracks=yes
    tracks=yes
If these are streets used by farmers, the correct tag is "highway=track" would you mind changing that?

Cheers, Jan
Jean-Pierre WEZA (2017-11-18 13:20:01+00:00): Hi Mueschel, 

Thanks for your comment. 
i'm just uploading  changes for this

Cheers !

JP
mueschel (2017-12-17 12:59:43+00:00): Hi,
there are still more than 9000 objects edited by you with the tag "tracks=yes".
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tQC
Leo Slager (2017-11-18 16:37:57+00:00): Beste Nilodo, In de afgelopen 32 jaar dat ik daar woon, wandel en fiets, heb ik daar geen wandelpaden zien liggen. Als iets er uit ziet als een omgeploeg stuk land dan is dat een duidelijke aanwijzing dat er geen wandelpad ligt. Bovendien bevindt je je op particulier terrein, deugdelijk afgesloten met een metalen hek en voorzien van het bekende blauwe bordje met de tekst verboden toegang, art 461.
Ik wil dan ook voorstellen dat je deze zogenaamde paden weer verwijderd van de kaart.
Mvg Leo
nilodo (2017-11-18 22:23:05+00:00): Leo,
Dan heb je in die 32 jaar toch een paar keer niet goed gekeken: Een aantal jaar geleden liep er wel degelijk een wandelpad, met officiele bordjes er bij. Dus geen verbod.
Zie: [2010] https://goo.gl/maps/znWrC8nBFmD2

Nog een foto uit 2010, met pad en hek er langs: https://goo.gl/maps/wyiik8dSn4D2

Zeer kort geleden merkte ik dat dit pad inderdaad ten dele is omgeploegd en heb ik het juist wéggehaald.

Ik snap dan ook je opmerking niet.
Zoals het nu is, is de huidige situatie.
Leo Slager (2017-11-19 11:28:25+00:00): Nilodo,
Je hebt volkomen gelijk. Ik heb de wijzigingsset niet goed bestudeerd en verkeerde in de veronderstelling dat je het pad had aangebracht. Mijn excuses voor mijn overhaaste reactie.
Mvg Leo
Geofreund1 (2017-11-19 09:36:15+00:00): maxspeed=walk an einem Fußweg halte ich nicht für gut. Ist auch lt. Wiki nur für living_street vorgeschlagen worden und selten in Gebrauch.
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2017-11-19 11:25:02+00:00): Der Weg wurde vor einiger Zeit von "gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg" auf "Gehweg, Radfahrer frei" umgeschildert, was tw. noch nicht umgesetzt war in OSM. Es ist aber auch weiterhin kein fahrverkehrsfreier Gehweg, also ist ein maxspeed im Prinzip nicht falsch und aus der StVO heraus ist dies Schrittgeschwindigkeit: "Ist durch Zusatzzeichen die Benutzung eines Gehwegs für eine andere Verkehrsart erlaubt, muss diese auf den Fußgängerverkehr Rücksicht nehmen. Der Fußgängerverkehr darf weder gefährdet noch behindert werden. Wenn nötig, muss der Fahrverkehr warten; er darf nur mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit fahren." (Anhang 2, bei Zeichen 239) Das Semikolon beschränkt das "Wenn nötig" m.E. auf nur den direkt nachfolgenden Halbsatz, so dass es nicht für die Schrittgeschw. gilt. SO lässt sich das auch aus alten StVOs folgern, wo diese einzeln stand und auch schon ohne Einschränkung. auf die Anwesenheit von Fußg. Da es sich hier um eine recht lange Strecke handelt, sollte man die Geschw. m.E. nicht unter den Tisch fallen lassen ...
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-18 12:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53900134, 53899941 where the changeset comment is: revert data that was imported again even though the user was repeatedly told not to
eggie (2017-11-17 20:55:38+00:00): Je werkt met editor iD. Dat is al een kleine ramp op zichzelf. De oude garde van het forum zijn jaren geleden al overgestapt naar editor JOSM. Wel even wennen. De simpele zaken doe ik met potlatch2. Die kun je ook opstarten vanuit de editor. Wanneer je daar iets selecteert kun je linksonder de advanced modus kiezen en dan heb je links een overzicht van alle tags. 
In iD moet je ook kiezen voor +alle tags. 
Ook dan kun je zaken apart verwijderen. 

Wil je beginnen met JOSM kijk dan op editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710   
Wanneer je doorzet zul je niet aan JOSM ontkomen. Kun je er beter direct mee beginnen. 

Je hebt per ongeluk Kerkstraat 29-15 verplaatst naar 19-03 http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53885352
eggie (2017-11-17 20:57:59+00:00): Ook dat per abuis verplaatsen van adresnodes zie ik vaak bij iD mappers.
eggie (2017-11-17 21:00:33+00:00): naar 29-03 bedoel ik
eggie (2017-11-17 21:04:57+00:00): adresnode zat geplakt aan dat andere pandje . 'k heb 'm even terugesleept, want dat losmaken is ook een heel karwei anders.
eggie (2017-11-18 08:27:17+00:00): Niets verder te maken met jouw edits, maar.. De Noordkriek, Elstar en omliggende straten heb ik even ontdaan van de aanliggende fietspaden cycleway=track. Dat zijn parallelfietspaden die er niet zijn, maar wel hinderlijk te voorschijn kwamen op de openfietsmap. (www.openfietsmap.nl)  
Wellicht kun je checken of ik het goed heb gedaan en er dus echtt geen fietspaden zijn?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53885352#map=18/51.57937/5.13194&layers=C
Commodoortje (2017-11-20 04:11:02+00:00): Loopt hier wel een pad?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541411323
Je brengt hier namelijk een pad met onderstaande tags aan, maar volgens mij is dit niet juist.
highway=path
service=alley
surface=paved
width=1
Op deze positie is volgens mij geen ingang.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5235427192
Maiic (2019-02-16 00:04:07+00:00): Ja, daar loopt een pad. Ik heb de ingang aangepast, want daar zit ' ie inderdaad niet. Er ligt een parkeerplaats voor die ik heb aangemaakt.
literan (2017-11-18 12:13:55+00:00): Перестаньте, пожалуйста, выдумывать фейковые объекты. Покемоны не придут
Hjart (2017-11-17 21:48:34+00:00): Please be aware that the imagery you are using doesn't appear to be all that well aligned everywhere in this area. Be sure to check with gps-traces or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava heatmaps before realigning roads and other features
Hjart (2017-11-17 21:51:44+00:00): For completenes please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Hestben (2017-11-18 22:05:20+00:00): Hi Hjart!

Oh, I expected the satellite imagery to be aligned properly.

I will refrain from moving existing objects only based on the imagery in the future.

Is there a way for you to purge the movings I made, but keep the added roads, and added attributes?
Hjart (2017-12-10 18:10:10+00:00): Hi, sorry for not responding immedidately. 
No, unfortunately there's no easy way to do that, so they'll have to be moved back manually. I did for a few roads though as well as added a few other roads in the area.
VictorIE (2018-03-28 09:33:26+00:00): Is the section of deleted road correct? this image seems to indicate it should be 50-100 metres further north. https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2018/0328/950576-road-dublin/

It seems from the photo it is open for pedestrians and cyclist.
DaveF (2017-11-21 14:18:03+00:00): Hi
Is this a garage? It needs another tag to render.
iandees (2017-11-17 22:30:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that OSM has individual fields for the information you added in the "description". There's a "phone", "website", and method of specifying the kind of business. Having all this information in one text field makes it difficult for others using this data to figure out what you added. I will go ahead and change this, but keep it in mind for next time. Thanks!
M!dgard (2019-02-05 22:48:49+00:00): Je gebruikt "bicycle:class" in plaats van de "class:bicycle" die op de wiki beschreven staat. Is dat per ongeluk of vind je bicycle:class beter?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-02-05 22:50:34+00:00): Das per ongeluk, ik haal die altijd door elkaar + nogal oud werk
M!dgard (2019-02-06 00:01:31+00:00): Okido, ik zal ze even queryen met Overpass en omtaggen.
M!dgard (2019-02-06 00:05:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66948401
user_3022894 (2018-08-15 09:28:20+00:00): Hi,
auch hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321647461/history ein ähnlicher Fall, das vorher bestehende building=residential wurde entfernt. Ein Versehen?
Viele Grüße
Thoschi (2018-08-15 09:57:42+00:00): Hi,
garantiert ein Versehen, solche Dinge kannst Du eigentlich sofort ändern.
Was mich wundert ist, dass die Tags für die Denkmalliste fehlen...die hatte ich eigentlich für alle Objekte in Barmen eingetragen...
VG Thorsten
Thoschi (2018-08-15 10:02:11+00:00): Ah, Nr 9 ist auch gar nicht in der Denkmalliste...habe operator auch gelöscht
Thoschi (2018-08-15 14:19:08+00:00): Ah, Nr 9 ist auch gar nicht in der Denkmalliste...habe operator auch gelöscht
user_3022894 (2018-08-15 20:18:18+00:00): Okay, dann weiß ich Bescheid, danke dir! Viele Grüße
samuelrussell (2018-06-01 17:33:29+00:00): I hate to note this about your edit, but Baptist Street's on road cycleways were already mapped as part of Baptist Street's way  (cycleway=lane ; cycleway:lane=doorzone)!

Keep up the mapping when you can!
R0bst3r (2017-11-19 19:04:07+00:00): Hallo Dirkmartinwilhelm,
willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast hier einige Straßen um mehrere hundert Meter verschoben:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53888530
Ich habe dies daher teilrevertiert. Bitte deine Änderungen genau prüfen, bevor du speicherst. Änderungen sind direkt online und werden verwendet.
Viele Grüße und noch viel Erfolg!
bobisthestar (2017-11-17 23:42:19+00:00): #masonmappers
naomap (2018-01-12 20:36:38+00:00): Bonjour.
Ces nodes portant le seul tag communication:mobile_phone=yes me semblent incorrect. Ce tag doit être associé à un équipement, par exemple un pylone telecom défini par man_made=mast et tower:type=communication. Voir la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acommunication%3Amobile_phone. 
Quelle était votre intention ?
Cordialement, Antoine.
gitouche (2018-01-13 16:45:04+00:00): Bonjour Antoine et merci pour le retour.

En effet je ne sais pas comment cartographier exactement ces éléments. Ce sont des antennes de téléphonie mobile situées sur les toits des bâtiments.

Le tag man_made=mast ne semble pas bien correspondre à ce cas de figure. La page du wiki pour man_made=mast nous renvoie sur  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecommunications_tower (mobile phone on a roof), bien que cette proposition n'ai pas été acceptée, c'est celle que j'ai utilisé.

Quelle est la meilleure façon de tagger des antennes de toîts?
naomap (2018-01-13 18:26:58+00:00): Autant pour moi. Je n'avais pas vu cette proposition qui semble être assez utilisée notamment en Allemagne http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/uKR. 
Je trouve étonnant de ne pas avoir de tag "principal" décrivant l'objet car il s'agit tout de même d'une antenne. Ce domaine mériterait d'être complété. En attendant continuez comme ça, on pourra les retrouver facilement si le modèle évolue.
marczoutendijk (2017-12-12 16:09:23+00:00): What has this park in Nijmegen to do with the 
#hotosm-project-3848 #IranEarthquake?
Why did you remove the landuse=grass?
tth3126 (2017-11-17 23:43:41+00:00): #masonmappers
marczoutendijk (2017-11-18 16:12:58+00:00): What has #hotosm-project-3848 #IranEarthquake to do with this village in the Netherlands? Can you use more specific comments please?
CRCulver (2018-04-29 18:41:04+00:00): Many of your edits for Turda, CJ are wrong. When you automatically applied postal codes, you made the error of applying the postcode for Turda in Tulcea. Please revert all postcode-adding changes to Turda, or fix your bot so that it can overwrite Turda, Tulcea postcodes with Turda, CJ ones.

Also, you are not supposed to make automated edits without announcing it on the OSM mailing list. Could you please link to your announcement? Thanks!
Strainu (2018-04-29 18:56:47+00:00): Thanks for catching this @CRCulver. I'll look into correcting the edits as soon as possible. You can find all details for this import, including links to the talk-ro discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Strainubot/postcode
CRCulver (2018-04-29 19:10:21+00:00): Great, thanks.
Strainu (2018-04-30 20:51:21+00:00): This should be fixed now. Most of the errors were caused by misspelled street names. I have fixed some, but others, such as Șterca Șuluțiu instead of Alexandru Sterca-Șuluțiu, seem to be caused by the city hall, not OSM data.

I'm currently looking for similar mistakes in other cities.

Thanks again for reporting this nasty bug.
IvanHerCaz (2017-11-18 00:31:10+00:00): Excuse me, I don't know why it has the hashtags #hotosm-project-2130;#Hurricane_Newton. I thought that I delete it before made this change not related with that.
SomeoneElse (2017-12-27 12:43:37+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here.   The mapper who made these original edits is long gone from OSM, so what remains is largely a "data tidying exercise".

I've deleted the main duplicate Shasta-Trinity NF way http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=487220873 (the original http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/70010/ hasn't been edited for 12 months as so is presumably OK).  I'll also look at the smaller duplicates added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47829109 .

It'd be great if other people could have a look at some of the duplicates highlighted within the https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html list post with a view to removing duplicates in the other ones too.

There's also scope to map the landuse etc. within the national forest boundaries such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418301052 better, but that will need more local mappers with local knowledge.  Currently in that example there's only http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64298706 , which is another import.  It's clear for example that the trees in the imagery at http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/40.61757/-122.94615 don't match what has been imported.

So thanks again, and if you've got any questions about this (or anything else) please drop an email to the DWG via data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (DWG member and occasional hiker in Northern California)
paulmach (2017-12-29 07:24:41+00:00): Thank you. I made the edit because it came up on OSM Inspector. I don't usually edit land use, but can see it needs some attention.
GerdP (2017-11-19 09:19:38+00:00): Hi!
I changed the unusual highway=path:disused to the common disused:highway=path. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
marc__marc (2023-06-18 20:55:54+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541452277/history
you added 2 phones numbers, both are valid ? one is the main ?
Regards,
Marc
AjBelnuovo (2023-06-18 22:32:21+00:00): Yes, both are valid and there is no information about main phone.
( http://www.educacao.sp.gov.br/central-de-atendimento/index_escolas.asp ) 

Where did you get the information that there are toilets for wheelchair users ?

Abraços ,

Airton
marc__marc (2023-06-19 06:34:03+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the feedback.
about wheelchair toilettes, you added the info in the previsous changeset :) I only fixe the key wheelchair_toilet -> toilets:wheelchair
Regards,
Marc
user_6820707 (2017-11-18 16:43:39+00:00): Fantastic
nevw (2017-11-18 03:56:21+00:00): Hi
you will likely find that using DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery will give you the latest imagery if needed.
b-jazz (2017-11-21 00:44:20+00:00): Zebras cross through buildings? I'm thinking this edit is bogus.
Dr Kludge (2017-11-19 23:45:34+00:00): Changing a street name for your spam is just not cool.  Locate where the business goes and add the business there.  Your work will actually be helpful.  Otherwise, no so much.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-09-17 21:54:11+00:00): Isso aqui é mesmo uma via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541462678 ?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-11-20 23:24:40+00:00): Hey JanFi,

Ik zie dat je de Moerkerkse steenweg hebt aangeduid als zijnde 'cobblestone'. Zou het kunnen dat dit 'sett' moet zijn? cobblestone zijn nogal ongeordende keien volgens de wiki.
JanFi (2017-11-21 12:47:24+00:00): Volgens mijn woordenboek zijn cobbles grote keien en cobblestones zijn dan echte kinderkopjes, sett is de formeel correcte naam voor plattere kasseien. Cobblestone wordt echter vaak gebruikt als naam voor sett, en ik zie dat de OSM-wiki aangepast is: sett wordt beschreven als 'In OSM, this is a subset of "cobblestone", and it is far more common to tag these surfaces with surface=cobblestone instead. ' Vermits ik daar een paar maand geleden gepasseerd was en mijn nota alleen 'kasseien' vermeldde, zonder te zeggen hoe vlak het was, wist ik niet meer hoe vlak ze waren en heb ik dus gekozen voor de algemene naam.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-11-27 17:25:27+00:00): OK, das goed. Ooit passeer ik nog wel eens om het beter te indexeren :p
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:14:24+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
majid1359 (2017-11-18 06:28:44+00:00): تگ بیمارستان شهید بهشتی بندرانزلی تصحیح شد لطفا در آپدیت بعدی نقشه ایران مسیریتب های osmand و Magic Earth و maps.me  اضافه شود با تشکر
Kuritsyn Roman (2017-11-18 06:48:04+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=53892649
Kuritsyn Roman (2018-07-19 15:27:02+00:00): *
atilinski (2017-11-18 08:14:52+00:00): Danke.
Владимир К (2019-03-21 16:23:34+00:00): Добрый день. название бы убрать надо. да и геометрия не очень понятная.
eggie (2017-11-18 07:47:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-18 07:52:47+00:00): Oke.. een bos wat er niet meer is kan weg. Let wel op dat je niet landuse plakt aan andere onjecten als wegen en gebouwen. Ik maak even de schuur los van het akkerland. 
Dit was je changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53893012
eggie (2017-11-18 07:57:08+00:00): landuse losgemaakt van gebouw. Individuele bomen kun je mappen met natural=tree  Ik er als voorbeeld twee op het erf gezet.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door goed in te zoomen.
Succes verder.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
GerdP (2017-11-19 09:14:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed the road class from highway=tertiary to the unusual value minor.
If I got that right the road is only used to get closer to the Philosopher Falls, so I think it is a highway=service + surface=unpaved.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
ajp99 (2017-11-19 11:19:50+00:00): Thanks GerdP
I am not very experienced with OSM tags so I was not quite sure how to classify the road. Your comments have helped and I have used your suggestion. I also notice that somehow I didn't actually add the 'steps' tag, which I have done.
GerdP (2017-11-19 11:44:33+00:00): Yes, and I still don't see any highway=steps ;-)
nevw (2017-11-20 08:47:52+00:00): Steps at end of the the walk I expect and look ok.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-41.46723/145.46386
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-11-18 07:20:08+00:00): تغییرات صورت گیرد
majid1359 (2017-11-18 07:23:44+00:00): تغییرات صورت گیرد
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].