piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mario159 (2016-02-05 12:59:26+00:00): war einfach ein copy/paste
Antonio Pozza (2016-02-07 14:31:29+00:00): Sentierino che collega Contrà Garibaldo con la chiesa di Montemezzo
user_5359 (2016-02-08 10:56:21+00:00): I have reverted your changes. This is a production database and not a test area!
naoliv (2016-02-06 01:51:07+00:00): GisManiac, when you replaced the hamlet areas by nodes you forgot to copy the population from them.
dudka (2016-02-08 07:57:32+00:00): why did you remove this relation?
dudka (2016-02-08 08:11:30+00:00): It is bad idea to remove boundaries that don't have outer ways.
If you had checked the history of r4255586 you'd find that another user removed outer way from relation by mistake.
wambacher (2016-02-08 10:12:13+00:00): Sorrry, did not find the history - may be i was too tired :(

did you restore it or should i do it? 

Regards
walter

btw: i'm fixing a lot of boundaries every day and sometimes i make errors too.

see: http://t1p.de/4df6
dudka (2016-02-08 10:13:54+00:00): yes, I've restored it
wambacher (2016-02-08 10:17:59+00:00): tnx
maraf24 (2016-02-04 23:30:38+00:00): Brak ulicy i miejscowości.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-02-04 23:43:20+00:00): No fajnie, tylko że niszczysz poprawne adresy i zastępujesz je wybrakowanymi wersjami. Porównaj sobie tagi z tego usuniętego przez Ciebie adresu: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2226229276/history
z tagami adresowymi na budynku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396094833
Tak jakby kilku rzeczy brakuje, prawda?
aj3 (2016-04-24 15:08:34+00:00): Hallo, eine „Mindestanforderung“ gibt es eigentlich nicht, vielmehr kommt es auf die Funktion im Straßennetz an. Gerade der Ostabschnitt der L306 hat durch seine Lage zwischen B256 und A45 eine übergeordnete Vekehrsbedeutung, höher als die manch benachbarter Bundesstraße. Daher sollte sie primary sein, wie auch im note=* beschrieben stand.
(Übrigens kann die SVZ2010 hier gar keine aussagekräftigen Zahlen liefern, schließlich endete damals die L306 schon an der L323.)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 07:08:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3989020876/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 07:09:21+00:00): would it be fine to remove amenity=office as office= is present already?
user_5359 (2016-02-08 10:52:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
GerdP (2017-09-07 14:29:46+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo lanes=as
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38287607
PlaneMad (2016-02-05 05:26:03+00:00): Thank you for fixing this. Cheers,
jorge_o (2016-02-07 01:26:50+00:00): Hola Yosimax:
Corté "Avenida Norte en dos pedazos porque una parte pertenece a la relación "Marina 3 y la otra no. Si combinas las dos pedazos en uno, esta relación se corrompe.
Saludos
jorge_o
Mars-Curaçao (2017-03-22 23:43:32+00:00): "Modifications to bring the map up-to-date and more details"  Lekker belangrijke info!! Hier kan een ander wel wat mee!!  Give more details about the things you did add or change!
Josuer (2016-02-05 03:13:19+00:00): Aún falta editar detalles de estos cambios.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-27 12:00:59+00:00): Hello,
I was just mapping some details based on GPS traces south of Talybont when I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3989292520 .  It's part of a "natural=heath" polygon that covers a large area north of Ebbw Vale.  Unfortunately, as you can see from that node and the ones either side, the accuracy with which it's drawn is very low indeed.  That nodes in the middle of a forest area, and the ones to the southwest have been plonked on the map with no thought for the underlying imagery.
OpenStreetMap is a shared map and we all need to work together to create the best map.  Imagine if it was a landscape painting - someone's drawing the sky, someone houses, someone trees etc.  Then someone comes along with a paint roller to fill in the grass, obscuring what everyone else has done.
Please do spend more time and don't just add very rough large-scale features that other people need to essentially redraw from scratch.  It will help if you zoom in a lot more as you are adding stuff.  I've said this before in 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35849713 and other people have also commented, such as recently in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43616663 .
Finally, as it is important that we work together, it's only polite to reply in changeset discussions such as the ones I've mentioned (and many others where you have been contacted in the past).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2017-02-09 23:40:21+00:00): The node that you added as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3989393999 was already mapped (and spelt correctly) as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242753178 .
user_5359 (2016-02-08 10:31:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you use the key level, did you mean building:levels (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels)?
PlaneMad (2016-02-05 08:53:22+00:00): Hey Akash, nice work improving Hyderabad!
Akash Kumar burman (2016-02-06 05:40:09+00:00): Thank you....
opendcc (2016-02-06 12:30:43+00:00): Hallo,

wieso sind nach der Änderung alle Straßenverbindungen innerhalb der Siedlung zerstört? Mühsame Reparatur!
Robert Lainé (2016-02-05 16:02:15+00:00): HELP! Why are all my edit of this morning not showing on the online map? What did I do wrong??
geri-oc (2016-02-22 10:55:14+00:00): bitte einmal Prüfungen in JOSM verwenden - oder andere Prüfprogramm (OSMOSE; keep_right) - einige fehlende tags oder tags von way an node. Habe erst einmal in Halsbach alles ingnoriert.
geri-oc (2016-02-22 10:32:40+00:00): Hallo Lea27784,

bitte beim editieren und node setzen beachten nicht mit HS-Leitung verbinden:
Halsbrücke Freiberger Straße Fußweg.
node 3989571811

Habe den Fehler noch nicht behoben zum nachschauen.
Lea27784 (2016-02-22 10:40:12+00:00): Ist korrigiert - danke für den Hinweis!
Commodoortje (2016-03-20 12:00:08+00:00): highway=cycleway is teruggezet naar highway=unclassified.
Wel zijn onderstaande tags aangebracht ivm bebording terplaatse.
mofa=yes
moped=yes
motor_vehicle=no

Ook zie ik dat je de tag cycleway=shared_lane gebruikt. 
Je zou even kunnen kijken op http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:cycleway#Fietskenmerken
Hier wordt uitgelegd wanneer je deze tag kunt gebruiken.
eggie (2019-10-29 15:59:49+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
.
awesm (2016-04-07 00:38:26+00:00): Please please always supply detailed changeset comments and sources on objects/changesets as applicable.

Just noticed and specifically wondering this time why section of Oxford St from Norwich Quay to Sumner Rd/London St intersection has been marked secondary.

Cheers
maraf24 (2016-02-07 21:33:36+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396141066
Ta droga nie może być jednokierunkowa, bo samochody nie wyjadą z parkingu.
Maanya (2016-10-24 06:46:08+00:00): Hey Sabeeh Sabir Baz,
We deeply appreciate your efforts in adding data into OSM. However, it would be great if you could discuss with the community the exact source of imports and document them in the import catalogue. Those imports that have not been discussed will be reverted.
mueschel (2016-02-06 13:15:13+00:00): Hi Devijver,
I don't understand the tagging of way 396152606. Are these containers to collect glass for recycling? Here is the description on how to tag them:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Cheers, Jan
gileri (2016-02-15 20:39:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour le Vieux Campeur :

- Le tag website=* devrait être utilisé pour pointer aux informations du magasin spécifiquement. L'adresse devrait également être complète, avec 'http://' au début

- Il en est de même pour l'article wikipedia, qui dans n'existe pas pour ce magasin spécifique, donc il convient d'enlever le tag.

- Le tag note=* devrait être une description=*, avec une majuscule en début de tag pour la lisibilité.

- Le numéro de téléphone devrait être écrit suivant ce format pour pouvoir être utilisé internationalement :
+33 4 78 60 81 00



Sud Odyssée : 

- L'adresse 20 Quai Perrache existe déjà en tant que noeud d'adresse. Il ne faut pas dupliquer les adresses, le noeud déjà présent à côté suffit généralement. Si une adresse de contact semble nécessaire, il est possible d'utiliser les préfixes contact:street, contact:housenumber, etc.

- Le tag note=* est utilisé pour "communiquer" avec les autres mappeurs, et ne sera probablement pas affiché avec des applications classiques (OSMAnd par ex.)

- Le site web devrait avoir http:// devant.
jc86035 (2016-02-06 04:06:20+00:00): The road signs there show that the expressway only starts 100m to the east of where the two carriageways converge to form four lanes with a divider, so the eastern end should be tagged as highway=motorway_link or highway=secondary.
00crashtest (2016-02-06 12:04:49+00:00): You check Google Maps to see if things are correct?
00crashtest (2016-02-06 12:05:19+00:00): You check in Google Street View to see if things are correct?
jc86035 (2016-02-06 04:19:04+00:00): Thanks, was going to do this in cleaning up woodpeck/Frederik Ramm's reversion.
jc86035 (2016-02-06 04:08:09+00:00): PLEASE don't delete connector ways in intersections like that because it messes up the turn restrictions. Search the OSM wiki about them.
utack (2016-09-30 21:25:21+00:00): Cool you added Greenfield Tea Factory, I always wondered where they are. Thanks
geri-oc (2016-02-22 10:44:54+00:00): turning_circle mit Straße verbinden oder way als area=yes
jc86035 (2016-02-06 04:01:16+00:00): Your first link is from 2004 and is not by the Transport Department, meaning it's not a reliable source for if a highway is an expressway. Detail could have been lost in translation.
As your second link clearly states, only the part of Ma On Shan Road at the intersection with Tate's Cairn Highway (i.e. the exit 7 slip roads) should be tagged highway=motorway_link or highway=motorway. Not the entire road.
00crashtest (2016-02-06 12:01:11+00:00): The first link is from the government, so it's reliable.
jc86035 (2016-02-06 12:24:00+00:00): The road is also not in the next link's document, which is supposed to be an exhaustive list of every expressway in Hong Kong. Ma On Shan Bypass does not have expressway signage.
00crashtest (2016-02-06 14:31:14+00:00): Since both documents are OFFICIAL AND CONTRADICTING, isn't it like contradicting laws? In this case, we should take the benefit of doubt, so Ma On Shan Bypass should be tagged as highway=motorway.
jc86035 (2016-02-06 15:22:40+00:00): The EPD document is from 2004 and states "will be gazetted". The Highways Department document is a later document voiding the designations in the previous gazette from 1 December 2009, which presumably voided the ones in the previous, and so on, so if it was an expressway at its opening it isn't one anymore. (One badly-scanned PDF from 12 years ago is not really a good source for the question "Is this road an expressway?".)

I'm not sure what definition of "highway" you have but every single road listed in http://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20101448/egn201014487570.pdf is signed all over the place with green signs and kilometre markings, and has "expressway begins" and "expressway ends" signs (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Diagrams_of_road_signs_of_Hong_Kong) at every entrance and exit. Ma On Shan Bypass is not one of those roads.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-02-11 06:27:47+00:00): Hi @DaGal, You should not use Google Street View to add data to OSM.
Jothirnadh (2016-02-11 06:52:33+00:00): @DaGal You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM can be found here - http://learnosm.org/
Marcussacapuces91 (2021-12-25 20:44:00+00:00): Pourquoi tant de name alors que ces numéros sont des ref
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 08:32:02+00:00): Please do not edit roads and things you know nothing about. You reverted my edit around Anda. Was tempted to revert the entire changeset, but I have instead fixed your road mistakes.

Ask the previous editor if you find data that might not match before editing.
tknudsen (2016-06-03 11:10:21+00:00): Dear sir, what external source are you using that allow you to indicate that my edits are false? Please answer and do not do any more changes until we figure out what source is more valid.
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 11:28:19+00:00): My own eyes?
They altered the area when the runway was made longer.
You can check out Google, Bing, Norge i bilder and vegkart.no if you do not believe me.
tknudsen (2016-06-03 11:40:51+00:00): Thank you for your answer.. I used statens kartverk for changing this, but will re-check when I get home from work. Do you know when they changed this due to extension of the runway.. Reason why I am asking is that we are making the the airport for x-plane and we are using the map to populate roads and houses in the area..
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 12:05:55+00:00): Karverket can be slow to update some data. Though "Norge i bilder" is showing the new runway and E39 in a picture taken May 2013. Further back in 2010 it was still under construction. Looks like Google map aerial is from around 2010. Bing however have a more recent one showing the longer runway.
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 12:14:40+00:00): Keep in mind that "Norge i bilder" can not be used as a source when editing here. This data is not considered open.
tknudsen (2016-06-03 14:19:28+00:00): I have permission to use Norge i Bilder and their wms version is even more detailed within JOSM. But I did check and it seems that Norge i bilder has some older imagery showing the runway not to be updated, so I checked with statkart and it seems to be correct. So for me this is truly ok. Thank you for reverting my changes. I will updated our OSM within the flight simulator to use the latest ones.  Let me know if you find any other places where I have amended your change sets, and we will figure it out for sure..
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 15:03:48+00:00): If you have a written permission by Kartverket to use those aerials in OSM then you need to post a copy of the permit on the mailing list and put on the OSM wiki. If this is a permission for only you then you can not use it in OSM.
I needs to be reported in as a source we can legally use.
tknudsen (2016-06-03 16:08:14+00:00): The permission is for my company and cannot be shared with the community for all to use.
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 16:33:58+00:00): But then you are not allowed to use this in OSM. Data used in OSM need to be open data, not some data that one person have access to.
Gazer75 (2016-06-03 16:41:37+00:00): Only data from Kartverket that can be used in OSM is what you find at http://kartverket.no/Kart/Gratis-kartdata/ which is licensed under CC BY 4.0
tknudsen (2016-06-04 23:52:33+00:00): I use my wms data in JOSM, this works great, I also use data from statkart to check in accordance with OSM, been doing this for years. Have a good one.  Case closed.
Gazer75 (2016-06-05 00:14:51+00:00): This is not a closed case. Will take this with the OSM data working group. Can't have OSM end up in a copyright problem.
You might end up with account ban and all data reverted. Really hope not, but they are very strict on this. So unless you can show a letter saying they explicitly allow you to use this to improve OSM, then this is a legal problem.
tknudsen (2016-06-05 22:23:13+00:00): Do what you like, I have all in perfect order so I have nothing to worry about,There is not copyright issue here, but do what you feel you need to do :)

PS..
Norgeibilder has no user restrictions 
https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/kartverket/norge-i-bilder-wms/50eaadfc-1f54-4a90-abca-8f3df239a4b7

But feel free to ask Jon Arne at kartverket
Gazer75 (2016-06-05 23:43:52+00:00): Sent a request for clarification on this.
From what I can tell the wms data is restricted and not released under NLOD or CC BY.
https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/search?text=bilder
Some of the data have no icon under open data column, but that doesn't mean it can be used. Only data with a green open lock would be acceptable for use in OSM.
Gazer75 (2016-06-06 08:07:23+00:00): Got a reply from Jon Arne Trollvik saying no, the Norge i bilder WMS data can not be used for OSM. It has licensing and is not open. So please stop using your WMS access to edit.
malenki (2016-02-06 13:25:20+00:00):  In diesem Changeset hast du die Kirchstraße nach Kirchgasse umbenannt. Findet man diesen Name vor Ort?
Maps4BW kennt diese Straße als "Kirchstraße".
malenki (2016-04-09 12:24:57+00:00): Da du keine Quelle nanntest und nicht antwortetest, habe ich die Straße wieder zurückbenannt.
zarl (2016-05-14 07:07:06+00:00): Hallo haytigran,

mich würde wirklich mal interessieren, welche Quellen ihr bei Mentz für eure Änderungen habt, auch hier mal wieder haarsträubendes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396204078/ hat zwar seitlich im Luftbild erkennbare Radwege, die sind aber seit sehr langer Zeit NICHT benutzungspflichtig. Warum also bicycle=use_sidepath?
Tocosibirsk (2016-08-09 20:31:53+00:00): ich hab den Pfad zwischen Bü Brühlerflurweg und Schmira Hp mal wieder draufgesetzt. Ist eindeutig noch auffind-, begeh- und (mit MTB) befahrbar. Parallel zum Sonnenweg gibt es wirklich keinen Pfad mehr auf der Kleinbahntrasse - da wird z.Z. Schotter gelagert.
maraf24 (2016-02-07 21:35:48+00:00): To teraz jest w 2 miejscach.
I nadal nie wiadomo, co to jest.
naoliv (2016-02-06 01:18:36+00:00): Por que você apagou as coisas aqui?
machadomurilo (2016-02-07 20:53:21+00:00): O confinamento desta fazenda foi desativado. Onde havia estes piquetes foi plantado cana de açúcar. Há ainda os outros piquetes, mas muito provavelmente o proprietário desmonte para plantar cana também. Trabalho na área.
naoliv (2016-02-16 00:38:40+00:00): Tá certo.
Quando for assim, coloque uma descrição na hora de salvar a sua edição, para que os outros mapeadores consigam entender o que está sendo editado.
Abraço!
Warin61 (2016-10-16 04:38:20+00:00): 'The Oaks' .. no one lives there .. so it is not a 'neighborhood' nor a 'hamlet' .. it is a 'locality'? node 117041402.

I have also altered the classifications of tracks/paths around here to suit the LPI Base Map.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-02-05 22:51:56+00:00): więc można usunąć budowe ale jak dasz 
leisure=fitness_station to się to nie wyświetli
mavl (2016-02-05 18:52:09+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
В этом пакете правок возникли ошибки. Создались ненужные отношения и добавлены две одинаковые точки (сейчас они для удобства сдвинуты):  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3990124045]  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3990124043]  
  
Такие точки, на которых указано только имя, бесполезны, так как неизвестно, что они обозначают. Добавьте им тег, который поможет определить их назначение. Например, для компании нужно добавить тег office=company, для магазина тег shop с каким-нибудь уточняющим значением.  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Объекты_карты]  
  
С этой точкой тоже самое  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3990124045].
Её назначение непонятно. Она также находится не внутри здания.  
  
Также в OpenStreetMap нежелательно пользоваться сокращениями. Если возможно, расшифруйте, что означает «ИСТ».  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия]
mavl (2016-02-05 18:34:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление информации. Точку кафе вы поставили не внутри здания. Желательно, чтобы точка кафе находилась внутри, так как в действительности кафе находится внутри здания. Также не нужно писать названия большими буквами. Пишите просто «Штолле». «кафе, пироги на заказ. Российская сеть.» - всё это не нужно писать в тег name. В теге name нужно писать только название (Штолле). Остальную информацию можете указать в теге description.  
  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3990100390]  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name]
cadsauxk (2016-02-07 11:09:18+00:00): Vocês estão apagando ruas para depois reinserir? Isto faz perder todo o histórico destas vias. Uma delas já havia sido editada 11 vezes antes de vocês apagarem. Inclusive neste caso apagou informações de acesso e de pavimentação.

Tenham respeito e consideração pelo trabalhos dos mapeadores que antecederam. Não apaguem nada do mapa.
MKnight (2016-03-19 16:30:02+00:00): Hier liegen zwei lift_gate übereinander mit unterschiedlichen Access:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2592852964 welcher ist richtig?
Lea27784 (2016-03-22 08:00:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Hab den doppelten Schlagbaum entfernt.
AlbertP (2016-02-05 15:25:46+00:00): Je noemt hier een website uit Bremen als bron voor opening_hours van deze kerk. Lijkt me niet goed.
tuxayo (2016-02-27 12:58:17+00:00): TEST FOR CHECKING STYLE OF A COMMENT: (as they are no editable/deletable...)

I though it was possible to import parcel data but no:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

- There is no consensus on whether to import them at all
- and even less about how to tag then, so using landuse could be a terrible mistake, preventing to fix tag it properly if an individual tag is decided
luiswoo (2016-02-05 15:47:12+00:00): Так правда на земле или в Раде?
luiswoo (2016-02-05 15:49:56+00:00): Звиняюсь, пока переименовывает подконтрольные н\п
dudka (2016-02-05 16:00:01+00:00): переименовал потому что новички уже начали делать это криворуко
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/J%20budissin/history
luiswoo (2016-02-05 16:18:49+00:00): А нужно ли волну гнать? Ещё даже сайты администраций городов на это решение не успели среагировать. Даже wiki:uk
Пока устав города не сменили, подобные действия выглядят поспешно.
BeKri (2016-02-05 21:57:25+00:00): Ok, sorry ...
irgendwann lern ich es hoffentlich endlich mal ...
R0bst3r (2016-02-05 23:15:19+00:00): Kein Ding. War ein neuer Key in der DB, hat auch nicht jeder :)
j-wills (2016-02-06 03:44:58+00:00): Не забывайте коментарии к пакету правок!
marczoutendijk (2016-02-06 09:18:22+00:00): Welkom!
Ik stuurde je ook een welkomstmail via je persoonlijke user pagina.
m902 (2016-02-05 23:22:16+00:00): Hi, you appear to have tagged Hazeldean B&B both as a house and separately as a hotel. I don't think that can be correct, could you take another look please?
trigpoint (2016-02-06 17:41:01+00:00): Hi
Just to clarify a little, the building should probably be tagged as tourism=guest_house, name=Hazeldean and the separate node removed.

Please ask if you need any help.

Cheers Phil
sixfoureight (2016-02-06 17:48:12+00:00): Hello, I have changed this now and added extra info, thanks
BCNorwich (2016-02-05 19:22:46+00:00): Can the Dream Shed be verified on the ground by anyone visiting the site? If not then it should not be included on OSM. 
If it is in fact a shed then it should be tagged building=shed and the name should be the actual proper name.
Nakaner (2016-02-23 14:54:01+00:00): I will revert this changeset partially in a few days because it introduced wrong data between Mannheim-Käfertal and Mannheim Hbf/Gbf.

I hereby ask you to edit more carefully and read other mapper's changeset comments (like this one)!
gormur (2016-02-05 18:05:54+00:00): But why change to a node?
If anything, it could have been expanded to a circular way, roughly the size and shape of the bay. Now there is no information about the size of the bay...
GerdP (2016-02-05 19:38:01+00:00): I don't know where the bay starts, and the wiki recommends to use either a node or an area, while JOSM complains about a way with this tag, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay
Constable (2017-12-30 10:38:09+00:00): Complimenti, bellissimo l'Arengario in 3D!
Alecs01 (2017-12-30 15:04:37+00:00): Grazie :)
Gh0stz0x (2017-12-30 18:16:29+00:00): Due guru che s'incontrano 😀
Constable (2018-01-01 17:51:44+00:00): Non esageriamo :D