piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2021-08-13 08:06:51+00:00): Hi,

Adding a track to a public transport version2 when it is not inserted in order brakes the route. Either take the trouble to insert it in the order from one way to the next ... or simply leave it out until you can? 

Relation: Train Indian Pacific (2033217) has the ways removed now. 

The master route should not have individual ways... they should go into the route relations - not the master route relation.  

Ok?
jeslop (2021-08-10 15:06:27+00:00): Change set reverted for copyright infringiment

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
angys (2021-08-07 14:47:33+00:00): Hi, please recheck your edit
DUGA (2022-08-25 03:45:03+00:00): They do not have any names, do not try to create for them:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970796477
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-08-06 06:51:00+00:00): Поля адреса заполнять не обязательно, не трать время.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109233771
Ralphie Raccoon (2021-08-08 12:54:40+00:00): Has this development been completed?
di5order (2021-08-08 14:40:44+00:00): Hi,
probably, received driver feedback that these roads already completed
attili1 (2022-04-14 06:04:55+00:00): Hi Sowmya,

Thanks for making the changes as per the ground.
A67-A67 (2021-08-06 11:18:07+00:00): De fout zit in dit geval bij de routeplanner, niet bij de data in Openstreetmap. De weg was getagd met bicycle=use_sidepath, wat betekent dat je er niet mag fietsen.

Het is overigens niet de bedoeling om een weg dicht te zetten met access=no en daarna per vervoersmiddel weer open te zetten.
A67-A67 (2021-08-06 11:26:39+00:00): Ik heb de oorspronkelijke tags hersteld.
Fred Marchee (2021-08-06 19:51:47+00:00): Duidelijk, bedankt voor de correctie.

Wat doe ik nu met voetgangers?  

Deze zouden ook over de Horvathweg mogen lopen. De routeplanner (Komoot) stuurt voetganger gelukkig wel over het naastliggende voetpad.
A67-A67 (2021-08-07 19:42:30+00:00): Je kan eventueel foot=use_sidepath toevoegen om aan te geven dat voetgangers het parallelle voetpad moeten gebruiken. Als er een bord verboden voetgangers staat dan kun je foot=no toevoegen.
A67-A67 (2021-08-07 19:43:33+00:00): Vaak geven routeplanners voorkeur aan een voetpad voor voetgangers, waardoor voetgangers ook zonder toegangsrestricties over het juiste pad worden geleid.
eggie (2021-08-08 05:35:26+00:00): Hier heb ik het 'nieuwe' fietspad ingetekend.. De situatie is dus weer veranderd.
Gr eggie
Pitoresker Pi (2021-11-20 18:00:25+00:00): Hallo sh_cc03,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du (unter anderem) in diesem Changeset an mehreren Straßen ein "service=driveway" ergänzt hast, obwohl diese Straßen keine "highway=service" sind.

Ich zitiere mal aus dem OSM-Wiki-Artikel [1]:
"service=driveway beschreibt eine untergeordnete Ein- oder Auffahrt zu einem Wohn-, Geschäfts- oder Firmengrundstück. Das Attribut wird zusammen mit highway=service benutzt."

Ich nehme an, dass deine "service=driveway"-Ergänzungen an nicht-"highway=service" also ein Versehen waren, oder was war deine Intention dabei?

Hier kannst du alle "verdächtigen" Wege in Hamm finden (wobei die meisten Wege wohl nicht von dir geändert worden sind):
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dfL


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service=driveway
ralley (2021-08-08 07:34:20+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments  Do you have a source for this manor?  A name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109235140
GOwin (2021-12-15 05:48:30+00:00): Thank you for confirming the location of Lantian Elementary School. The school you identified as "Senior High School in Labangas" doesn't seem to match any school from the DepEd database, would you know the school's actual name?
GOwin (2021-12-15 05:52:03+00:00): Never mind, found a match from Deped's EBEIS: "Francisco A. Relacion Senior High School" ,   № 345844.

Thanks for confirming the location! Keep up the good work.
VictorIE (2021-09-05 08:42:11+00:00): You might check the street names attached to addresses here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871511174 Note that the street name changes without a junction.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-08-06 10:14:00+00:00): Hi, using the word "details" in every changeset doesn't allude to what you have done. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
seattlefyi (2021-08-07 15:34:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Good job with the edits, always glad to see new construction mapped - and with addresses! Just a couple of tips: you can make your building corners square in iD with the ‘q’ hotkey (or select, then right click for popup menu), and the street name convention is to expand abbreviations like NW. Hope to see more edits! Thanks.
mullender (2021-08-07 17:23:30+00:00): @seattlefyi thanks for the tips, I will try that later. I was hoping the satellite imagery would also update, which would make the tracing a lot easier.
seattlefyi (2021-08-07 22:32:42+00:00): Sure! In iD, if you open on the "backgrounds" pane (from the icons on the right), updated imagery is available in two of the options Esri World Imagery and Maxar Standard. The imagery may be shifted, so would suggest tracing the buildings, then perhaps switching back to Bing and realigning with that imagery (having most buildings in area consistently aligned is best, and Bing is usually pretty good)
seattlefyi (2021-08-07 22:33:27+00:00): The imagery shift option is at the bottom of the backgrounds panel
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-07 15:45:25+00:00): ¿Por qué agrega un parque si en las imagenes no se ve que haya algún parque aquí?

Aquí solo hay casas
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-07 15:45:44+00:00): ¿Por qué agrega un parque si en las imagenes no se ve que haya algún parque aquí?

Aquí solo hay casas
Piskvor (2021-08-06 13:58:05+00:00): Díky za zpřesnění mapy. Waze ale, myslím, data z OpenStreetMap nepřebírá...má nějakou úplně svoji vlastní.
gscholz (2022-03-19 07:20:40+00:00): Hi Javier_7011,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Municipio de Unquillo":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.29830&lat=-31.24034&zoom=13

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109236595

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9470201#map=14/-31.2354/-64.3077

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-05-09 04:01:04+00:00): Hi Javier_7011, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-07 15:45:34+00:00): ¿Por qué agrega un parque si en las imagenes no se ve que haya algún parque aquí?

Aquí solo hay casas
borovac (2023-03-03 11:29:32+00:00): Hi jarmosu,
I see that you have added a name from MML Background but the name does not match the information from MML Background, can I ask you to check that information.
You add name: Rantalantie but in MML Background name is Santalantie
All best borovac
jarmosu (2023-03-03 11:38:31+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the commet. Yes, it was my mistake and it is now corrected.
Best regards Jarmo
borovac (2023-03-03 11:52:50+00:00): Thank you too.
Best regards Milan
iWowik (2021-08-07 07:08:38+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятый порядок наименования улиц:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
iWowik (2021-08-07 07:41:59+00:00): Кстати, я вам уже писал про ошибки неоднократно
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107099450
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107746256
mueschel (2021-08-13 16:34:12+00:00): Hi,
what does 'cycle_barrier:backward' mean? This tag isn't used in other places. I can't imagine a barrier only in one direction.
MicDK (2021-08-13 16:54:55+00:00): Hi Mueschel,

Well it's my attempt to map a cycle barrier on at two way footway that also allows for biking in both directions. The cycle barriers is only for cyclists approaching a street in the northern end of Tipsvænget.

You can see the situation here on Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps/@55.0579643,10.5653377,3a,49y,307.61h,91.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBqBZMo2pKjcJ-q_TP_8zOQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

I'm always open to better suggestions. Osmose and OSM Inspector hasn't objected to the tag.


Best regards

Michael
mueschel (2021-08-13 17:24:30+00:00): Thanks for the image.
You can use "barrier:backward = cycle_barrier", there's no need for a second tag here. 

I don't know if you're aware of the current proposal for further details of such barriers:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_cycle_barrier_tagging

This might be especially useful for the barrier on the road to the North.
But also for these one-way barriers, to make clear they are no real barrier as you can easily drive around them.

Jan
MicDK (2021-08-14 03:38:14+00:00): Hi Jan,

Didn't know about the proposals. Have corrected the barriers according to your suggestions. 

Best regards
Michael
riysingh (2021-08-09 05:54:26+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 109239547 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
riysingh.
Robert46798 (2021-08-06 14:00:09+00:00): Hallo Salera,

danke für deine Aktualisierung!
Du hast beim Hochladen angegeben, dass der Änderungssatz überprüft werden soll, deshalb habe ich ihn mir angeschaut.

Der Weg hat noch einen Wert "tracktype" (ich kenne die deutsche Übersetzung im Editor gerade nicht. Der steht noch auf dem Wert "1". Das ist aber für Wege mit fester Oberfläche (z. B. Asphalt). Schau am besten einmal im Wiki, welcher Wert für "deinen" Weg passender ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Am besten passt du das noch entsprechend an. Viele Anwender (Karten/Router) werten diesen Wert noch vor der Oberfläche aus.

Ein weiterer Schlüssel um die Oberflächengüte anzugeben ist übrigens smoothness: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness

Viel Spaß beim weitermappen,
Robert
Robert46798 (2021-08-06 14:03:09+00:00): PS:
Schau am besten mal noch unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
ob dein Verständnis von Schotter mit der Definition in OSM zusammenpasst. (In der Tabelle unter "unbefestigt".) Viele meinen damit etwas was bei OSM als verdichteter Weg (compacted) eingetragen wird.
riysingh (2021-08-09 10:11:50+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 109240236 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
riysingh.
NKA (2021-08-06 12:01:33+00:00): Hvorfor fjerner du mange gatenavn?

Og hvorfor legger du til service=driveway på gatestubber som ikke er private oppkjørsler, men som er stikkgater inn til flere hus?
pesuan (2021-08-06 21:01:34+00:00): driveway uten navn er mer i tråd med hvordan innkjørsler i Asker og Bærum allerede er mappet. Mulig noen av dem kunne vært service (med eventuelt videre forgrening til en driveway). Uansett mener jeg at det hovedsakelig er gatene som er residential i boligområder som skal navngives. 

All navngivning av innkjørsler tar livet av for eks tjenester som https://citystrides.com/cities/95535/ som brukes OSM.
NKA (2021-08-07 09:55:45+00:00): Slike stikkveier har name=* i resten av landet, mye fordi NVDB og Karverket gjør det slik. Og dette er gater som like gjerne kunne vært mappet residential - det er bare en smakssak om de blir service eller residential. Hovedsaken er at disse gatene ikke er private innkjørsler men offentilg tilgjengelig villaveier (selv om de ligger på privat grunn).

Uansett synes jeg man skal ha svært gode grunner til systematisk å ødelegge det en annen mapper har lagt inn.
pesuan (2021-08-07 16:06:39+00:00): Det er ikke et forsøk på å systematisk ødelegge, men forbedre. Du har gjort mye bra mapping i Asker og Bærum. Det er bare det rundt stikkveier vi ser ting litt ulikt. Jeg ser at jeg kunne brukt innkjørsel sjeldnere, og stikkvei oftere. Noen navn burde kanskje heller ikke vært fjernet. På samme måte som at du kunne brukt innkjørsel noe oftere og navngitt litt sjeldnere. Stikkvei til flere hus er grei. Der skal jeg være litt mer konsekvent. Innkjørsler bør ikke navngives. Stikkveier kan navngives dersom de ganske åpenbart kan benyttes av allmennheten uten at det føles for invaderende å bruke dem. I alle fall sånn jeg ser det.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966670523/ mener jeg burde vært en innkjørsel uten navn. 

openstreetmap.org/way/966670523/ kan godt være en stikkvei, men usikker på om det kvalifiserer til å få navn.
eggie (2021-08-06 07:53:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback .. Adresnodes zijn allemaal import vanuit de BAG. Je kunt dan source=BAG laten staan en/of evt. aanvullen. 
Beter geen adresnodes gaan aanpassen, want nu is adresnode 4a verdwenen. Bestaat deze niet meer?
De Brink 4 bestaat volgens het Kadster niet.
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=de%20brink%204%20hoev&resultOffset=0&objectId=0267200000002710&geometry.x=159692.391&geometry.y=465331.274&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0267010000005794

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-06 07:58:16+00:00): Dag de boer..
Schuivev met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op. Je selecteert per abuis een node adresnode (De Kreek 2) met de linker muistoets en gaat vervolgens schuiven.
Je schuift dan de node (met alles wat er evt. aan vastzit mee.
Editor iD is berucht in deze.
Beter dus niet schuiven..  :)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-06 08:00:11+00:00): Hubo teruggeplaatst naar gebouw
eggie (2021-08-06 08:12:11+00:00): Tip name=* 	Name of ATM. 	better use operator=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Datm

gr eggie
deboerfp (2021-08-10 11:34:17+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Thanks voor je nuttige feedback, ga er op letten de volgende keer. En ik zal in het vervolg niet meer schuiven ;).
eggie (2021-08-10 11:42:42+00:00): Of overstappen op editor JOSM.. Daar schuif je met de rechtermuisknop en je selecteert met links.
Een aanrader
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 
Mapse,
eggie
Dodko (2021-08-06 09:13:29+00:00): Treba trošku pozornejšie robiť úpravy. Z budovy bytovky ste zrušili, že je to budova aj vymazali adresu. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137101851/history

Pôvodnú kanceláriu ste nevymazali.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2403583801/history

Opravil som to.
PT-53 (2021-08-07 05:47:42+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. die Merkmale
note=*
addr:street=Vogelhof
ergänzt. Ich habe beides wieder gelöscht.
Wie ich Dir schon mehrfach mitgeteilt habe, ist Vogelhof kein Straßenname sondern der Hofname und dafür wird addr:place verwendet. Werbung (in Note) ist in OSM generell "unerwünscht".

In der Telefon-Nr. war noch ein Fehler. Diesen habe ich bereinigt.

Grüße
Warin61 (2022-03-17 03:37:45+00:00): Paths connect to the bridges! They don't stop some meters before them.. 

The 'roads' on the bridges' are of the same type as the 'roads' they connect to....
vogelfreier (2024-05-09 12:26:04+00:00): Why are you apologizing for an update to construction data. You're not responsible for the data collection, are you?
You can't expect that just because a building is being erected, the area of the building is immediately included 1 to 1 in OSM with missing official geodata. Be it in my case in some German federal states or like you over there, where whole swathes of land are being paved over on the basis of cheap timber construction because there is a lack of affordable housing.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-07 08:45:08+00:00): Jei takas privatus, t.y. neprieinamas viešai, galiu nuimti tourism=attraction žymas?
Talkless (2021-08-07 19:04:30+00:00): Nežinau, tikriausiai, Dubysos Regioinio Parko direkcija jo savo svetainėje irgi nebemini...
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-09 05:18:09+00:00): Ačiū už info. Ta proga ištryniau.
Talkless (2021-08-09 08:11:54+00:00): O kaip pastebi tokius pakeitimus? Kažkokiu būdu "užsirenumeravęs" savo sukurtų objektų pakeitimus?
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-09 08:17:33+00:00): Į places.openmap.lt patenka tik mano patikrinta informacija. Taigi visi pakeitimai atsistoja į „eilę“ ir aš juos peržiūriu rankiniu būdu. Tada ne tik patikrinu info, bet, kai reikia, dar ir aplinką papildau, kad nebūtų objektas plikoj vietoj, kad būtų privažiavimas/priėjimas ir pan.
DP24PH (2021-08-18 02:54:33+00:00): ERRATUM on comment: [Tiaong, QUE]
jimkats (2022-10-19 18:50:50+00:00): (I saw that now) You mistakenly changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782437612 from pedestrian to residential. I fixed it, but it makes me wondering what made you consider that street as normal road.
Raenbow (2022-10-20 21:36:01+00:00): Hello jimkats, Vesterbro is no longer on our team but I can respond on their behalf.

I see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782437612 appears different than surrounding residential roads. Thank you for the update here and happy mapping!
caistk (2021-08-09 09:30:01+00:00): takie mapowanie jest błędne, to nie są dwie osobne jezdnie przedzielone fizyczną barierą. proszę o rewert tej edycji.
Yunkers (2021-08-16 19:55:16+00:00): Hej, zgłosiłem wycofanie tej zmiany i zmian z nią związanych.
1. Między jezdniami na Focha/Jagielońskiej nie ma żadnej bariery, są tam jedynie tory tramwajowe na których jest buspas i pasy do skrętu
2. Podzielone jezdnie i tak nie przebiegają między torami.
3. Ulica Gdańska nie może być secondary skoro jedyne ulice pozwalające na nią wjechać mają zakazy wjazdu.

Moją prośbę możesz zobaczyć na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=838063#p838063
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-17 10:12:56+00:00): "brak możliwości zawracania na tych jezdniach " - tam jest podwójna ciągła czy zazkaz zawracania czy osobna jezdnia?

Jeśli jest podwójna ciągła / zakaz zawracania to nie powinno to być na osobne jezdnie dzielone
sravy (2022-04-14 10:19:24+00:00): Hi sowmya ,
Thanks for editing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109247809
user_1566574 (2021-08-12 12:13:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Malheureusement vous pouvez annuler votre modification concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71911628, car ce n'est plus une caserne à cet emplacement. Elle a fusionnée avec une autre (des Hôpitaux je crois) pour ouvrir, il y a une semaine, à Labergement-Sainte-Marie.

Merci à vous ! 🗺️
phd0 (2021-08-12 13:48:18+00:00): ok, c'est corrigé. merci de l'info
Piotr Strębski (2024-07-10 08:08:00+00:00): Hej, co to za podziemny chodnik pod placem Kościuszki? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252744818
Mathias Haugsbø (2021-08-06 09:44:14+00:00): Heisann kjekt at du er med på å forbedre OpenStreetMap i Norge!

Som er grunnregel ønsker vi å mappe ting som finnes i dag, som er mulig å bruke per i dag. Dette er fordi flere rutemotorer bruker kartdata fra OSM. Om denne sykkelveien ikke er brukbar enda er det nok mer riktig å bruke taggene:
```
highway=construction
construction=cycleway
description=Planlagt sykkelvei
start_date=2021-10-10
```
- Da vil ikke rutemotorer veilede syklister inn på denne veien før construction taggen er fjernet.
- Endre gjerne start_date til kjent dato for ferdigstilling
- Legg gjerne til kilde i description, slik at ikke andre som redigerer kartet sletter veien fordi den ikke er synlig på satelittfoto.

Men om sykkelveien åpner om noen uker/1 måned eller to vil jeg si at det er fornuftig å bare la den stå som highway=cycleway og droppe construction tag.

Hilsen Mathias Haugsbø :)
Mathias Haugsbø (2021-08-06 09:44:53+00:00): Du kan lese mer om construction tag her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
PeregrinTok (2021-08-06 11:00:40+00:00): Hei Mathias, 
Takk for nyttig tilbakemelding. Strekningene jeg har lagt til er gjort for å teste noen funksjoner i utvikling av en digital tvilling av kommunen, og planlagt slettet i nær fremtid, da det er noe uklart hvilket tidspunkt sykkelveiene vil være åpnet. Men jeg endrer taggene til å være planlagt konstruksjon. 
Hilsen Bork Sundseth
Noen (2021-08-06 11:25:46+00:00): Hei! Vi har et test-server til slikt. Vennligst ikke utfør tester i live databasen.
Les mer her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_.28advanced.29
PeregrinTok (2021-08-06 12:14:22+00:00): Hei! Takk for info. Er det en enkel måte å slette det jeg har lagt til i live databsen?
Noen (2021-08-06 13:22:06+00:00): Ja, med et annet redigeringsverktøy som heter JOSM. Jeg kan gjøre det for deg.
PeregrinTok (2021-08-06 13:35:19+00:00): Okay, flott takk!
gscholz (2021-08-17 04:46:46+00:00): Hi Edouard ,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping and not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-88.03522&lat=14.15453&zoom=15&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109248526

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2021-08-25 05:03:45+00:00): Hi Edouard, 
these errors still exist, can you please give response here?
Guido
Warin61 (2021-08-19 08:11:46+00:00): Hi
TC building corrected and simplified to a simple way.
fkv (2021-10-13 22:04:10+00:00): Ich ersuche dich, hier und überall, wo du es sonst noch gesetzt hast, source=mindat.org zu entfernen, weil die Daten erstens von mir vor Ort aufgenommen wurden und zweitens mindat.org das Übernehmen von deren Daten gar nicht erlaubt.
kuhni74 (2021-10-14 11:53:26+00:00): Ich habe, wenn ich nicht irre, nur hier auf mindat verwiesen. Ich gebe Dir recht, dass der nachträgliche Link als "source" für den Mapping-Vorgang im engeren Sinne nicht stimmt, aber ich denke, dass der Link als erläuternde Info für Dritte nützlich sein könnte. Findest Du es zweckmäßig, jeweils eine Notiz mit "siehe auch LINK" zu erstellen?
fkv (2021-10-14 17:38:18+00:00): Ich hab weder gegen sowas wie source:resource=mindat.org noch gegen note="siehe auch..." was einzuwenden, warne aber davor, Daten von dort ungeprüft zu übernehmen. Z.B. bei Grillenberg (bei Payerbach) wurde der Stollenname verwechselt.
kuhni74 (2021-10-15 07:43:55+00:00): Daten übernehme ich eh nicht, ich würde es für "weiterführende Infos" gut finden. Grundsätzlich sind jegliche Daten mit Vorsicht zu genießen, egal wo sie herkommen, das ist für mich relativ selbstverständlich. Deswegen finde ich auch so wichtig zu dokumentieren, wo Daten herkommen, das macht es nachvollziehbar.
eggie (2021-08-06 10:51:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
❤️‍🔥 (2021-08-11 08:47:35+00:00): Hi, ways 840886759, 722836095, 722836096, 246588892 are definitely not lit - it's one of the dodgiest places in taka
❤️‍🔥 (2021-08-11 08:49:02+00:00): also the surface is not concrete, it's a deteriorating gravel/mud path
LACDH (2021-08-11 08:54:06+00:00): Thanks for the update, tired to revert them in the app when I saw images, but couldn't I'll reverse these soon.
LACDH (2021-08-11 09:03:11+00:00): Looks like you did this for me already...
NKA (2021-08-06 11:38:12+00:00): Jeg tror ikke vi kan ha wikidata-tags på veier/gatenavn. Det blir mange tusen tags og i praksis umulig å vedlikeholde. Gatene er enkle å søke opp via name i stedet.
hros (2021-08-07 12:47:32+00:00): Verdiene på disse taggene er svært stabile
NKA (2021-08-07 12:58:22+00:00): Tviler ikke, men veiene (ways) er ofte svært ustabile. Dvs. de blir ofte splittet opp og endret på andre måter, og jeg tviler på om noen vil orke å holde wikidata-taggen ajour når veien endres. Vi har samme utfordring med route-relasjoner, som etter hvert ender opp med å bli fragmenterte og misvisende.

Et annet spørsmål er om det er meningsfullt å ta inn wikidata-tags i så stort omfang.
Wulfmorn (2021-08-07 15:51:54+00:00): og så blir det bare stort omfang i veldig små områder (der noen gidder). resten av Norge (og verden) vil mangle infoen og hvis noen skal nyttegjøre seg wikidatainfo om veier så må man ha et veldig lokalt prosjekt.