piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2022-10-19 15:45:06+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,
Debido a que los carriles bici no estan separados por barreras físicas de la calzada, no debería añadirse una vía de carril bici. Además, de manera correcta, el carril bici ya está etiquetado en la vía principal con la etiqueta cycleway=*. Creo que otro editor ya lo ha corregido. Me puedo imaginar que es un engorro dedicar tiempo a añadir información y que deba eliminarse. Pero creo que la corrección es correcta y he aprovechado para informarte para que no pienses que el cambio no está fundamentado.
Un saludo y, por cierto, que bien está quedando la ciudad de València con toda la información que estamos añadiendo... :)
Jordi MF
wolfgang8741 (2022-11-13 19:55:49+00:00): Thanks for marking the bridge as closed, but access = no for all should be sufficient. Switching the road to barrier doesn't make sense, but putting a construction area around the bridge and barriers on the way would make more sense. The construction area allow for a stated end and last checked to ensure the feature is clear as to why it is closed and enable checking if the state changed or known end time is past. See modifications I made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128861014
literan (2022-10-12 17:41:09+00:00): не надо вносить все подряд.

ссылки на википедию - только на статью об этом конкретном объекте
literan (2022-10-12 17:49:47+00:00): теги немного другие (и в name пишется только имя собственное)

исправлю.

дальше дорожка пойдет на строящийся мост над автобаном
VlPo (2022-10-12 17:54:07+00:00): Хорошо, спасибо.
Я крайне редко вношу правки, потому и прошу, чтобы кто-то знающий проверил.
balint36 (2022-10-12 11:18:04+00:00): Szia!
Érd állomáson a vágányok címkéje már úgy volt előkészítve, hogy az új Érd-Érd alsó összekötő vágány a 40-es vonal bal átmenő fővágányába fog csatlakozni. Ennek az az oka, hogy a 4-es számú váltó egyenes irányban az ÁFV-ra (átmenő fővágány) terel.
Ezzel szemben te azt jelölted, hogy az összekötő majd az 1. vágány felé fog folytatódni, ami azért nem jó, mert a 4-es váltón az csak kitérő irányban érhető el.
Vasútvonalak nem feltétlenül kezdődnek/végződnek az állomás egyik peronja mellől vagy forgalmi iroda elől, gyakran előfordul, hogy az állomás váltókörzetében egy kitérőből indul vagy kitérőben végződik.
Az átépített Érd állomásról (és az egész 40-es vonali projektről) itt olvashatsz, és láthatod, hogy az összekötő vágányról (a dián még csonka) egyenes irányban az átmenő fővágányok felé lehet bejárni, nem pedig peronos vágányra: http://bgok.hu/vonalismeret/40/story_html5.html?lms=1
Ha nem gond, a MÁV-os anyaggal összefüggésben beállítom a címkéket is helyesre.
leveskockaa (2022-10-12 12:10:09+00:00): Szia!
Észrevételed jogos, azt hittem én jelöltem így korábban. Nem akartam extra munkát adni, köszönöm ha kijavítod.
balint36 (2022-10-12 22:04:53+00:00): Nincs semmi gond, szerencsére iD-ben gyorsan megy a címkézés :)
Szerkesztéseidből ítélve úgy tűnt nekem, érdekelt téged a téma, ezért fejtettem ki bővebben. Ugyanezért küldtem el BGOK-os anyagot, hátha érdekel téged is.
opendcc (2022-10-12 06:08:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I ask you to:
add a meaningful changeset comment (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
and reduce the area size of your changeset.

Thank you.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-12 22:32:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
Truchin (2022-10-13 12:10:32+00:00): Bonjour  JBRPHND,

T'es sûr qu'elle est ouverte cette piste ? La dernière fois que j'y suis passé, ce n'était pas le cas.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Taksine (2023-09-15 18:28:24+00:00): 已经通车了你还改？
MxxCon (2022-10-12 06:10:46+00:00): Hello.
You can use lifecycle prefix to indicate features that no longer exist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385333
MxxCon (2022-10-12 06:12:45+00:00): Perhaps tag the nearby building as a warehouse if appropriate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385630
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 07:52:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172839236/history  - wait, how something may be zone:traffic=PL:urban and maxspeed=20 ?
A67-A67 (2025-07-30 08:23:18+00:00): I think you're commenting on the wrong changeset. I didn't add the tag but I just corrected the prefix. It was NL:urban (build-up area according to Dutch traffic law) and I've changed that to PL:urban (build-up area according to Polish law).

The tag may be correct. Zone:traffic and maxspeed:type are different tags.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 10:10:32+00:00): Yes, I seen you changed it fixing country error - but I hoped you may have some insight here in tagging

BTW, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-is-the-point-of-zone-traffic/133391 seems to confirm it
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:38:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
We welcome you as a new mapper. 
However, I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please map more accurate and follow the rooflines, also of an annex or extensions.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385935
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:34:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected. You did not square them at all.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385962
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:33:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected. You mapped 71 buildings, of which 56 were not squared.
Please map more accurate. You oversized sometimes the buildings and included trees or yards.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385970
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:00:57+00:00): Hello. Please read my comments on other changesets and improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385979
Frans S (2022-10-12 14:58:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127385995
Kovoschiz (2022-10-12 13:02:22+00:00): What's wrong with this one? There's clearly something there.
Carto_Ferret (2022-10-13 16:01:20+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, I removed a portion of way 1052837546, based on my conversation with Ian Ho on this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119879220. Ian Ho stated they had been in the area and verified the path was not there. Strava supports this and Maxar Premium Imagery shows a degeneration of the path compared to earlier aerial imageries, so the edit seems justified. Do you have any additional information that supports the existence of this path?
Kovoschiz (2022-10-14 10:02:03+00:00): Ok, I think you two are thinking about different parts. Let me see....
RaphaelPasloin (2022-10-13 02:20:17+00:00): Hello,

Thank's for using openstreetmap. Your changeset has been reversed : you move the street on adding buildings. On ID use ALT key to prevent node to collapse.  Can you also add aditional comments as indicate in hotosm project page : • changeset comments - These are filled in with some default information but you should always add what you mapped. For example "added buildings and roads" or "added in some waterways" or "marked a gas station but need to double check"
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:10:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please pay more attention to accurate mapping. Your mappings are often a bit oversized.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127386145
MxxCon (2022-10-12 06:18:51+00:00): Hello.
You mapped bike path closer to Flatlands Ave as a separate path, however it is already mapped as tags on the road way itself. Your change goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. Such bike path should be mapped only once, either as a separate path or as tags, not both.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127386228
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:03:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate, oversized and not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Map more accurate please.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127386230
mariotomo (2022-10-12 14:42:30+00:00): hi, welcome to contributing to OSM! if you're a local person and able to add and validate names and other local information, your help will be invaluable! here you added a Plaza Bugaba, for which there is already an object, on the opposite side of the Panamericana. if it's a retail area that spans on both sides, you can add a landuse=retail and name it. then remove or fix the names from the two buildings.
be welcome to https://community.openstreetmap.org/
mariotomo (2022-10-12 18:06:36+00:00): hi again. I moved your building to landuse=retail, and added a new building=mall for the built-up area alone. I put the name on the landuse, not on the building. we could add the parking area, and the driveways, or the roofed paths. I'll leave that to you now. please notice how the rendering is not updated immediately, that's the way it is, to update the rendering costs computing time, and OSM does not have that in huge quantities.
Warin61 (2022-11-21 04:40:43+00:00): Hi,

The 'four square pitch' would have 4 squares .. these have 8 squares .. so would be 2 pitches?
marczoutendijk (2022-10-23 11:22:35+00:00): Hi OrdinaryJosh,
This way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651573509
isn't correctly tagged as a parking and won't show up on the map with the "P" sign.
Here is how to do it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
OrdinaryScarlett (2022-10-24 09:34:01+00:00): Thanks for the comment! I've hopefully fixed the issue now.
GPar (2022-10-13 09:46:04+00:00): also this camera dosen't exist. There are 2 cameras in the opposite site of roundabout already mapped , even  if not well placed.
MxxCon (2022-10-12 06:26:19+00:00): Hello.
This riding academy's perimeter is drawn rather sloppily and inconsistently. It's cutting through the driveway, parking lot, front lawn with statue, etc
I'd expect that the parking lot would at least be included.
Additionally, on some of the sections you traced the perimeter right on top of paths, gluing two together. Doing that is suboptimal since that makes it needlessly harder to edit each individual feature independently. Please pay attention not to attach features to each other unless they really are attached.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127387902
wilfisher (2022-10-12 13:00:18+00:00): Hi - although it looks sloppy, I drew the perimeter to follow the lease area from National Parks Service, which follows paths at some times and does not at others, as well as cuts through the parking lot. Feel free to change to a more rational shape reflecting the commonly understood boundary if that is a better approach

https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/foia/upload/GATE-Jamaica-Bay-Riding-Academy-Lease-2024.pdf
Supaplex (2022-10-13 05:59:02+00:00): 應該不是這個問題，有可能是路線沒接好
adrianojbr (2022-10-15 20:25:23+00:00): Olá, Caconog!

É recomendável evitar a remoção de elementos para recriá-los, sendo preferível editar o que já existe no mapa, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history.

Destaca-se que o Josm, com o plugin utilsplugin2 instalado, é possível substituir a geometria existente por uma nova.

Abraço!
Caconog (2022-10-16 12:29:10+00:00): Desconhecia isso, vou me atentar nas proximas ediçoes e vou dar  uma lida nesse plugin de substituir a geometria
 Obrigado Adriano!
frozenrabi (2022-10-13 11:03:27+00:00): Brother.. Add tags before uploading the buildings. I have noticed you have not given buidlings tags and you have just created a polygon with no key value. Unless you are using building plugin, you need to give key values for every node, polygon and line you make. Use create areas "X" tool as well for creating buildings with >4 modes.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:17:23+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127389828
ڕاستی (2022-10-12 21:33:55+00:00): بە چ بەڵگەیەک ناوی ئەو شەقامانە هەڵەن؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127389768
LockOnGuy (2022-10-14 06:58:16+00:00): @ڕاستی , you know these numbers/names that I deleted are fake and wrong, you yourself start to add the real numbers later after me in changeset 127440872 127441020 127440906 127441177 and 127472927.              
If you disagree please provide a source back your claim.          
I'm local and I know these are not the ones used.         
I'm gonna explain this to the others since you alredy know these fake names were first added by a user named Dhiae in changeset 38086667 and 38086929 which is clearly an import from his map app that have fake and made up road names that he made so his app is easier to navigate, see this video they explain the names/numbering they made in their app: https://youtu.be/-wJhR3KFPR8         
ڕاستی, I know why you asked this question, it's because I exposed your hundreds of vandal edits when you removed thousands of name:ar and Kurdification alot of areas near the Kurdish region. You asked this question here and did the same at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127330628 and you rated them as "bad" in osmcha just to try to give me a "bad image" I guess?          
Please stop being salty and do better.
ڕاستی (2022-10-14 09:30:26+00:00): یەکەم نازانم، لەبەر ناولێنانی پڕۆژە نیشتەجێیە تایبەتەکان هێشتان یەکانگیر نەکراینەوە لەگەر ئەوانی کە. دوو ئەمن دەستکاری ناوی شەقامەکانم نەکردییە و دەستکاری ناوی باڵەخانەکانم کردییە. سێ بەبێ بەڵگە ناوی شەقامان بسڕیەوە بەس بڵێی هەڵەن ئەوە بێگومان هەڵسەنگاندنەکی خراپی دەدەمێ. چوار ئێشی تۆ تۆمەت بەخشینەوە نییە و بۆشت نییە لە خۆتەوە تۆمەتبارم بکەی تەنیا بە لێکدانەوەی مێشکی خۆت، و پێت وابی هەرچی ئەتوو بیکەی ڕاستە، لەبەر ئەوەی هەست دەکەم شتەکەت بە کەسی وەرگرتییە. پێنج ئەگەر پێداچوونەوە بە ئیشەکانی تۆشدا بکەم دڵنیام سەدان هەڵەی تێدایە بەڵام ئەوە ئیشی من نییە. شەش ماوەیەک پێش ئێستا دوام لێکردی کە دابنیشین و لەسەر ئەو شتانە بدوێن، بەڵام وەڵامت نەدامەوە. حەوت ئەگەر بەدووی چارەسەرەوەی و دەتەوێ ئەو کێشانە چارە بکەی دەبی گوێت لە هەمووان بێت، فەرموو با لە شوێنەک دابنیشین و قسەیان لەسەر بکەین.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127389768
LockOnGuy (2022-10-14 09:47:24+00:00): @ڕاستی, sure, you can make yourself that you don't know what I said and keep ignoring while you got busted and block multiple times for your vandalisms.                
You want to discuss your issues with name:ar and the existing of name:ar you can discuss it with the community @osm_iraq in Telegram.       
I will still monitor your edits for vandalism in this account and the others of yours.                
You need to reply to my comments and question on your edits here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4800812
ڕاستی (2022-10-18 22:32:50+00:00): "You can make yourself that you don't know what I said and keep ignoring while you got busted and block multiple times for your vandalisms."
ماڵی خۆت لە شووشەیە بەرد لە ماڵی خەڵکی مەگرە. ئەوەی وەکو ئامۆژگارییەک وەرگرە بۆ خۆت باش نییە.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127389768
ڕاستی (2022-10-18 22:36:04+00:00): "community @osm_iraq in Telegram"
ئەگەر بمزانیبایە لەوێ چارە دەبێت لە تۆم نەدەپرسی.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127389768
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:17:32+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127388611
adiatmad (2022-10-20 04:19:10+00:00): Good day! 
Your edits look great (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103050717). But please avoid adding untagged ways. 
Happy mapping!
Quentin Golsteyn (2022-10-12 16:56:14+00:00): More background on this changeset:
- These neighbourhood labels used to be identified with `place=suburb`
- They were changed to `place=neighbourhood` I assume because the City of Vancouver qualifies them as such
- The issue is that OSM prefers to use suburb rather than neighbourhood to parcel a city. An OSM neighbourhood is defined as a subpart of an OSM suburb.

This changesets only changes the `place=neighbourhood` for the 22 official neighbourhoods of Vancouver as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_neighbourhoods_in_Vancouver
adiatmad (2022-10-20 04:14:39+00:00): Good day! Your edits look great (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103054951). Allow me to suggest you press Q to square buildings. Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:17:48+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Harel M (2022-11-20 21:47:52+00:00): Please note that you have created an administrative boundary that is not complete. please be more careful next time.
Vonter (2022-10-12 05:37:16+00:00): Hello!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you have been adding a lot of highways and roads in Bangalore, which is nice to see!

There are a couple of cases though where I've been seeing roads being tagged incorrectly, or roads which I know don't exist, based on ground experience, are getting added to the map. Like in this case, the roads which have been marked inside Lalbagh as Residential Roads, are unlikely to be so since the park is primarily meant to be used by pedestrians for walking. Please go through the Wiki for more details on how a particular road can best be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Classification

I have also noticed that you're adding the #ola hashtag to every changeset. Is this mapping activity that you're involved with being organized by Ola? If yes, it would be good to go through the Organized Editing Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing

Also, general tips and good practices for mapping on OSM that can be helpful are available on these Wiki pages:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map

In case of any questions or if you are not sure how to proceed with certain types of mapping, please approach the OSM India community https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/
Devdatta (2022-10-12 13:45:22+00:00): Madhumita, I'v removed the incorrect road for now, but let's review all the roads you have added so far, and lets make sure that we follow all the guidelines.