piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:03:47+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
A67-A67 (2017-12-13 17:46:59+00:00): Volgens mij klopt deze wijziging niet. Binnen de bebouwde kom van Nuenen ligt geen aparte busbaan, maar een busstrook op dezelfde rijbaan. Deze was al ingetekend. Vlak voor de rotondes is een korte vrijliggende busbaan. 

Ook takken de wegen op de voorrangspleintjes pas aan het einde van het plein af, niet al aan het begin. Op de pleintjes zelf is een voorsorteervak naar links.

Kortom het lijkt alsof rijbanen en rijstroken door elkaar gehaald zijn.
Jvitegem (2017-12-14 05:46:37+00:00): Ik ben daar geweest en volgens mij klopt het wel. Het klopt dat de bus baan op tegen de rijstrook van de auto's aanligt maar de bus baan ligt 15 cm hoger en is gemaakt van een ander soort asfalt dan de rijbaan voor auto's, daarmee is de busbaan geen onderdeel van de rijbaan.
Wat betreft de voorsorteervaken op de rotondes heb je gelijk dat voorsorteervakken zijn maar ik vind het duidelijker omdat zo aan te geven want dit is voor een navigatiesysteem de meest gebruikelijke route.
A67-A67 (2017-12-14 14:28:08+00:00): Bedankt voor de snelle reactie!

Wat betreft de busbaan/busstrook. Het materiaal bepaald niet de grens van een rijbaan, maar of er een fysieke afscheiding is. In dit geval is er een stoeprandachtige grens. Het is dus discutabel of het een fysieke afscheiding is. Ik zal het op het forum vragen wat andere hiervan vinden.
Wat betreft de voorrangspleintjes: We mappen de werkelijkheid en niet wat er mooi uit ziet op de standaardkaart. Een voorsorteervak wordt niet als aparte weg gemapt. De tags lanes=2 en turn:lanes=left|none geven de voorsorteervakken aan. Die tags worden ook in OSM-navigatiesystemen als OSMAnd gebruikt.
A67-A67 (2017-12-14 14:36:58+00:00): Ik heb het in het forum gevraagd:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=677202
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:03:38+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:03:24+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
sbiribizio (2017-11-17 14:04:08+00:00): Ho visto che hai abbassato la classificazione di Via fratelli Parodi a unclassified.
Le strade unclassified rappresentano il rango più basso delle strade fuori dai centri abitati, mentre per le zone abitate, si utilizza highway=residential.
Come vedi dal wiki le unclassified sono strade "non residenziali":
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Se sei d'accordo ripristina per favore il tag residential alla strada.
4nc4n (2017-11-17 14:22:22+00:00): In realtà il mio scopo era quello di "alzare" la priorità rispetto a Residential, non di abbassarla, per dargli priorità rispetto alle stradine limitrofe che passano tra le case (e che sono "più" residential di Via Parodi): spesso i navigatori selezionavano percorso tra le case invece che fare via Parodi.
Però assegnargli il valore "tertiary" mi pareva troppo.
Ho guardato qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway#Highway_.28strade_e_vie.29
e come vedi "unclassified" si trova tra tertiary e residential, perciò penso di avere alzato il livello, non abbassato.
Altrimenti cosa consigli per alzare il livello?
sbiribizio (2017-11-17 14:25:05+00:00): Consiglierei una tertiary dalla rotonda sul canale (esclusa) alla rotonda di Corso Indipendenza, così collega le due strade con più traffico.
4nc4n (2017-11-17 14:55:28+00:00): Ok, Facciamo così. Le modifico subito.
Ciao.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:03:17+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:03:08+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-16 21:11:00+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-16 21:15:25+00:00): Beste pietr000 ,, We zetten in OSM geen adressen op de gebouwen zelf. Die staan al op de adresnodes die zich op het gebouw bevinden. Graag reactie. Ik haal het adres er weer af.
eggie (2017-11-16 21:24:10+00:00): Uiteraard de tandartspraktijk laten staan.
majid1359 (2017-11-16 19:18:44+00:00): اداره گاز انزلی تصحیح املایی است
*Martin* (2017-12-07 09:05:33+00:00): Ahoj Patrick. Cisla domov mozes tagovat podla ceskoslovenskej schemy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/Syst%C3%A9m_adres
Minh Nguyen (2017-11-16 19:26:10+00:00): Also added emergency crossovers, advisory speed limits, height restrictions, and hazardous cargo designations.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-11-18 06:02:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Участники отменили изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удаляете правильные данные. Метро каким-то образом мешает вам использовать данные OpenStreetMap?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:08:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
HolgerJeromin (2017-11-16 20:14:52+00:00): http://members.aon.at/montande/schaukraftwerk.html bestätigt diesen Namenswechsel
mavl (2018-12-25 21:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 12:05:01+00:00): Делая разделение улицы на 2 вея вы сломали роутинг в этом месте: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541149603/history

Пожалуйста делая изменения дорожного графа, 500 раз подумайте, что вы делаете.
Dinamik (2019-01-13 13:10:10+00:00): Уточните, пожалуйста, какой разрешённый на местности манёвр оказался запрещён в карте или какой запрещённый на местности манёвр оказался разрешён в карте.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
luiswoo (2017-11-20 21:16:58+00:00): Я не постиг дзен по *_link (не всегда понятно, где кончается перекресток-развяка и начинается сама дорога — нарушается принцип уровень к уровню без хвостов), но линки соединяют дороги равные или уровнем ниже, то есть secondary_link не может соединять secondary с primary — это должен делать primary_link, если этот линк там вообще нужен.
luiswoo (2017-11-20 21:25:17+00:00): ps линки с ниже лежащими линками тоже не соединяются вроде.
RiG's (2017-11-21 05:40:00+00:00): Тут вообще навести порядок нужно, но думаю стоит это делать когда уже дорога будет достроена
EmbeezGIS (2017-11-25 17:41:43+00:00): The polygons from Hershey159 in this square are very poor. Need squaring up and are very poorly digitized.
eggie (2017-11-16 21:27:04+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-16 21:34:42+00:00): Wellicht kun je beter een nieuwe import aanvragen op het forum. Dan heb je ook alle nieuwe adresnodes op de goede plaats. Nu ontbreken er een aantal denk ik.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=weigelia%2013&resultOffset=0&objectId=1916200000040253&geometry.x=86183.146400512&geometry.y=456037.9525982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1916200000040253
Simpel doe een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import en zet dan deze link erbij. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53855049#map=17/52.08749/4.38572

Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
inlog als in osm
chachafish (2017-11-17 06:59:48+00:00): Greetings, jahbrewski,

Thank you for your contributions to openstreetmap. I notice you changed Washington Street to "North Washington Street". This has the effect of immediately flagging over a hundred addresses of buildings  as being on the wrong street. Can you cite your source for the change to "North Washington Street"? Denvergov.org lists the name of the street as, "Washington Street" and street signs on Washington reflect this as well. Do you have a source or will you please change the name back to Washington? Thank you and happy mapping :)
jahbrewski (2017-11-17 14:52:57+00:00): Hmm. So, I live at 79 N Washington St, and our official address through the USPS is 79 N Washington St (see: https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupResultsAction!input.action?resultMode=1&companyName=&address1=79+Washington+St&address2=&city=Denver&state=CO&urbanCode=&postalCode=&zip=80203) - also, Google maps shows the street as N Washington. Looks like some sort of discrepancy?
chachafish (2017-11-17 15:32:23+00:00): I looked up your official property record from the City and County of Denver. You actually live at 79 Washington Street. USPS is most likely adding the "N" so its drivers don't accidentally go to 79 South, if that address exists. Here is your public record: https://www.denvergov.org/Property/realproperty/summary/161252008
chachafish (2017-11-17 15:40:46+00:00): Also, Google Maps cannot be a reference for OSM mapping. Google Maps are often incorrect and they're copyrighted, so we don't use them for OSM purposes :)
chachafish (2017-11-17 15:43:22+00:00): If you walk outside, you'll see the street signs say, "Washington", not "N Washington" ;)
jahbrewski (2017-11-17 16:08:27+00:00): Ah! That’s awesome. I’m learning so much about where to go for accurate data. Thanks for looking into that and I’ll change Washington back :)
jahbrewski (2017-11-17 16:09:32+00:00): So - do you think we should we give our address as 79 Washington from now on?
chachafish (2017-11-17 16:51:44+00:00): Technically, yes. Your address is 79 Washington Street. In Denver, anything north of Ellsworth does not have a, "North" designation. Anything south of Ellsworth does have a "South" designation. Historically, that's just the way Denver has always done it. If you go to the "property map" and go south of Ellsworth, you'll see all addresses have an, "S" with the address. Google Maps has it wrong here.
4004 (2017-11-16 21:45:18+00:00): здравствуйте,
билиард обозначен был не просто так, он ставится доп тегом к основному
GerdP (2017-11-17 08:13:42+00:00): Hi!
I've reverted mixed types highway=living_street;residential
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222401635 to highway=living_street, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53866881.
It seems that GoMap! produces these wrong tags, so please be careful and maybe contact the programmer to fix this problem.
tonyf1 (2017-11-17 05:40:54+00:00): Hola. ¿Hay una tienda aquí? Es un parque?
Hi. Is there a shop here? It is a park?
tonyf1 (2017-11-19 21:56:34+00:00): Sorry. No reply to comment, nothing in satellite photo, nothing in Mapillary street level images. It looks like there is just a park. Deleting a photography store.
goedegazelle (2018-01-18 07:24:57+00:00): A shop will most likely not sell kids. I found it at the address Avenida Carrera 30, which was wrongly filled in (with the number in the street name field).
Corban8 (2018-01-22 21:55:34+00:00): Thank you for the input. I took a look at the shop in question and changed the shop type to a baby goods store. As for the name of the street being incorrect, the number does belong in the street name from what I can tell. The number is not a specific address. Close by are Avenida Calle 53, Avenida Calle 63 and so on.
Jrachi (2020-12-07 09:10:28+00:00): Ciao stimatissimo!
Hai fatto tu la "Balconata di Ormea"?
Hai creato delle route=hiking con network=rcn
Secondo la pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network=rcn
rcn si mette su percorsi ciclistici.
Quindi o hai sbagliato hiking o hai sbagliato network.
Ciao, Ivo
suburbanstudio (2020-12-07 09:48:52+00:00): Ciao IVO.  Nop...  non l'ho fatta io e avevo visto essere parecchio pasticciata.   Si sovrappongono poi almeno 3 macro-relazioni :  Via Alpina Red, GtA, SI , se hai bisogno confrontiamoci anche con @francians Concordo sulla questione rnc, è un'hiking route.   Bisognerebbe poi attualmente confrontarsi con il CAI Ormea, per individuare le tratte interrotte o fortemente danneggiate dall'alluvione 2016. CIAO
Jrachi (2020-12-07 10:00:03+00:00): Se non sappiamo chi ha creato la relazione è un problema.
Dalla cronologia risulti solo tu per questo tratto.
Sull'altro c'è di più. Autore Ale_Zena che conosco (che mi ha già dato carta bianca per le modifiche che ha fatto in zona.
C'è anche un riferimento del CAI Ormea.
Modifico in modo che rispetti i canoni attuali e lascio a qualcun altro la sistemazione completa.
Per il resto sentiamoci su telegram
Phil973 (2019-08-29 01:48:21+00:00): Bonjour sly, au sujet de ta remarque "je ne sais pas trop comment les tagguer, c'est un marquage sur un poteau pour confirmer la direction du chemin emprunté. Et j'ai pas toujours noté exactement ce qu'il y a dessus, une fleche, une marque jaune, ou rien. Utile quand il y a de la neige"
Il me semble que les tags suivants conviennent bien :
Tourism = information
Information=route_marker
Cf. la page du wiki : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:information
gileri (2017-11-27 21:03:05+00:00): Nickel !
errolpais (2017-11-16 23:56:27+00:00): Reverts changes from previous changeset due to accidental submission
patrick noll (2018-02-26 10:35:25+00:00): Leavitt locations you changed in this changeset were correct.  Why did you remove them as advertising?
woodpeck (2018-02-26 10:44:41+00:00): They were added by a SEO company (using 4 different throwaway accounts that will not respond to comments, and are not interested in learning how to make correct contributions to OSM). The SEO company took care to get all the contact data right but there wasn't a single shop or amenity or other tag that would actually tell us in OSM what these were about. What they did was just "write a name on the map" without caring for how we here in OSM work with data. I was faced with a choice of either finding out the correct tagging and spending my free time completing the shabby job a paid company has done, or rejecting their input. I chose the latter. I would have acted differently had this been the work of a newbie but from a company taking money for adding data to OSM, I expect that they don't cause more work for the volunteers.
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-26 12:14:52+00:00): Hei, det er nå 2 objekter med no-barnehage:nsrid=1014723. Kan du fikse så det bare er 1 Bekketunet barnehage? Eventuelt med relations hvis det faktisk er 2 separate områder.
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-26 12:16:04+00:00): PS. Vennligst ha 'data.udir.no' i source
FredrikLindseth (2017-11-26 14:05:42+00:00): Det skal jeg ha fra nå av. Fikset IDen her og nå :-)
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-26 14:13:45+00:00): Flott!
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-26 14:19:43+00:00): ehh, eller ikke. Nå får jeg " Flere openstreetmap objekter funnet med no-barnehage:nsrid = 1013770" på Maurtua barnehage istedenfor
FredrikLindseth (2017-11-26 16:08:14+00:00): Veldig rart. Jeg får fikse det og prøve å finne ut hva jeg gjør som fører til dette
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-26 16:09:50+00:00): Det er en duplikat her:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31820293
Såvidt jeg kan se er denne feil og det du har gjort her riktig. Fikser du way/31820293?
FredrikLindseth (2017-11-26 16:10:33+00:00): Ja :-)
Fant den nettop selv  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tkp.
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:36:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
4004 (2017-11-17 21:51:12+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
к сожалению, правку вашу удаляем,тк гимназия уже отмечена, и с правильным нозванием
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-06-22 05:55:16+00:00): Hi EKNunez!
I think this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541200008 is properly tag to unclassified. So I would changed it to unclassified.
Thank you!
luschi (2019-01-31 17:10:23+00:00): Hi Russ McD,     
ist this highway realy a oneway?     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235843698/history     
regards
GerdP (2017-11-18 05:46:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of unclassified on 6 ways,
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541209115