piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dpolovinkin (2024-02-20 09:11:27+00:00): hi! :) stumbled upon this addition - can you clarify a bit - you added a stream with a lot of warnings when it is crossing streets and buildings, and I see no sign at all of this stream existing from the satellite. Like it is completely arbitrary added, where does the info about it comes from? :)
dpolovinkin (2024-02-20 09:17:16+00:00): Saw the imagery_used, checked the dgu.hr: Topo 25, I see some kind of a stream there, so you copied it as it seems, but apart from that it seems that it just doesn't exist in reality, there's just no stream there on satellite, or am I missing something here? :)
dpolovinkin (2024-02-20 09:31:21+00:00): for now I removed them, as I see you didn't map for a year already, so don't know will you answer or no, but in any case will wait for clarification and will happily revert my deletions if there will be a explanation about those streams.

But for now I just see 0 signs of them existing there + streams can't cross construction sites, buildings and roads.... dunno but seems you didn't check what you add...
bernardirfan (2024-03-14 16:48:24+00:00): I added those streams from dgu.hr: Topo 25 new. Those streams are intermittent. They occur very rarely. They occur only when the weather is very rainy, e.g., during thunderstorms with a heavy rain, when the ground cannot absorb so much wather from the thubderstorm heavy rain. That is why those intermittent streams are not visible on the satellite map. There are many such intermittent streams accross the Croatian islands, mainland coast and the interior of Croatia, and accross the world. Some of such streams can even convert to a sudden torrent and even cause floods in villages or towns during violent thunderstorms with heavy rain. So, I woult like to add those intermittent streams back, because, despite they rarely occur in reality, they occur under specific weather conditions like thunderstorms with a heavy rain.
bernardirfan (2024-03-14 16:55:37+00:00): And such intermittent streams are the very cause of the existence of valleys like this one you had been marked. During long geological periods, even a rarely occuring intermittent stream erode the ground, making a typical stream valley on the face of the Earth.
bernardirfan (2024-03-14 16:57:01+00:00): And I am still active here. My activity here is very intermittent, just like those streams you deleted.
bernardirfan (2024-03-14 17:03:56+00:00): Or you can revert your deletions of streams I added. People must know about the very existence of the streams you deleted. Deleting the streams I added is a loss of relevant informations. The streams I added do not exist during light or moderate rain, but exist during thunderstorms with a heavy rain. I am not an OpenStreetMap Deletionist, I am an OpenStreetMap Inclusionist.
bernardirfan (2024-03-14 17:29:06+00:00): Actually I added those streams back. If an intermittent stream exist very rarely, that does not mean they never exist.
dpolovinkin (2024-03-14 18:02:47+00:00): hi hi! yeah, activity in intermittent indeed hehe!
thanks for explanation! sure, if you see reason for that, let's keep them! I just can't understand, how such streams can possibly cross road or building, doesn't sound realistic for such stream to even exist no?
bernardirfan (2024-03-15 17:30:11+00:00): Oh yes, they exist. If you don't believe, just go to the valleys those streams created during violent heavy rain thunderstorms :) Ofcourse, if you dare to go there during very loud thunder, heavy rain, hurricane winds and lightnings :)
bernardirfan (2024-03-15 17:30:45+00:00): Here is the explanation. The streams I added back literally have tunnels beneath the roads, so they do not cross roads. There are tunnels on other places as well, e.g. beneath some buildings, but the buildings are often drawn off their real place even dozens of meter off, so it looks like the streams cross the buildings, or the drawn streams are drawn over the buildings by mine or someone else's mistakes. Those tunnels beneath the roads are on the dgu.hr: Topo 25 new. I added those tunnels not because I want to, but because they are on the source map, the dgu.hr: Topo 25 new. Such very intermittent streams really exist. I saw such streams with my own eyes during heavy rain thunderstorms. One such stream, a very small short stream, flooded the interior of a hotel where I have been worked, because the hotel is builded on the path of that extremely intermittent stream. Some intermittent streams flow below the surface of the Earth on multiple places and appear back on multiple places as tiny springs or tiny tiny waterfalls :)
bernardirfan (2024-03-15 17:45:14+00:00): Even very intermittent streams are able to create characteristic valleys on the surface of the Earth, and the creation of the valleys happen during long geological periods. Almost all natural rivers and streams have their valleys. Some extremely intermittent streams even have names, like Vriakule 1, Vriakule 2 and Vriakule 3 on the island of Krk, above the town of Punat. They flow on the surface of the Earth and disappear thru the surface, probably flowing into some caves and appear back below the surface of the sea, as cold non-salty springs. I saw such springs with my own eyes too, the springs created by intermittent streams.
dpolovinkin (2024-03-15 17:56:51+00:00): interesting! didn't know much about such streams, thanks a lot for detailed explanation! :)
bernardirfan (2024-03-15 17:58:57+00:00): Another example of very intermittent stream is a very small, short stream named Kijac on the Island of Krk near the village of Malinska. The islands of Krk, Cres, Rab, Brač, Hvar and on the peninsula of Pelješac have many intermittent streams, some of which have names. The islands of Mljet, Korčula and Vis have just a few very intermittent streams.
bernardirfan (2024-03-15 17:59:32+00:00): Welcome! :)
Matija Nalis (2024-05-31 22:24:26+00:00): Hi, just a note if you're not aware: when a (part of the) stream passes under the houses/roads, it should be marked https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel=culvert

Thanks for mapping!
bernardifeanyi1 (2024-06-01 00:27:17+00:00): Yes, I'm aware, thanks for noticing me. I added tunnels thru which those very intermittent streams I added flows below the roads, because those tunnels are on the source maps, but I must see with my eyes if the tunnels below those buildings exist, because they are not on the source maps, so I refused to add on my own stream tunels below those buildings, in which case I might be wrong. Maybe someone help me to check the existence of the tunnels below the buildings, or the streams actually flow close to the buildings, not below them. I see many intermittent streams crossing roads and buildings added from other editors without any tunnels. I added the tunnels on other editors' streams as well, if they are on the source maps or if I saw the tunnels with my own eyes.
!bm (2020-11-30 21:10:32+00:00): analog zu / s.Anm zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95047437
axelr (2020-12-01 08:16:28+00:00): Du hast gestern über 100 Fehler in die Busrelationen eingebaut. Ich weiss nicht ob es an deinem iD-Editor oder an dessen Einstellung oder an deiner Bedienung liegt.
Du könntest aber Weihnachten mal ein Kerzlein für ToniE anzünden, er räumt oft hinter dir her.
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 23:25:05+00:00): Hallo herrlukas,

folgende Wege sollten anders getaggt werden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879413498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879413499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879413500

einfach: highway=construction + construction=footway

Dann werden die footways auch auf der Karte angezeigt ;-) Magst du das noch korrigieren

Viele Grüße

PS: ein frohes Neues 2021
herrlukas (2021-01-01 20:38:46+00:00): Hallo  Ze0zohk1,

danke für dein Feedback.
Ich habe die Tags entsprechend angepasst.

Grüße
Ze0zohk1 (2021-01-01 20:44:33+00:00): Hallo herrlukas,

vielen Dank dafür. Ich habe die residentials oben in der Ecke eben nachgezogen. Die hättest du noch nicht angepasst. Sind die Parkflächen schon fertig oder auch noch im Bau?

Viele Grüße
DUGA (2021-03-02 15:06:04+00:00): Hi,

You made really inferior updates to the map.

Please:

1. Do not add buildings with such low quality.

2. Use MD 6-inch map in Maryland, do not use Bing at anytime.

3. Join Slack channel if you wish to talk with us.

Thank you for the understanding.
Gallizenae (2020-12-27 21:53:05+00:00): You are doing good changes, but please write what you've changed. When using Farsi we can use Google Translator, but just "ok" has no value to other mappers.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-12 09:45:03+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3262695 ?
eggie (2020-11-30 20:57:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
iandees (2020-12-02 02:29:27+00:00): As we've talked about before, please don't delete roads and re-add them. Just fix the existing data. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95067957
kylebakerpa05 (2020-12-02 17:15:08+00:00): alright?
Routes of Power (2020-12-02 22:36:10+00:00): Please don't deleted abandoned railway lines, tag them with railway=razed if applicable.
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-01-15 07:44:18+00:00): salve,
il tag corretto per i nome dei percorsi mtb è mtb:name non name

saluti Andrea
mauche (2021-01-15 10:39:54+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
ritieni che i nomi che ho inserito siano specifici del mondo mtb e che quindi non si possa utilizzare il tag name? Io uso l'editor del browser. Sai dirmi come posso inserire il tag mtb:name come suggerisci con l'editor del browser? Inoltre sai su che mappe il tag mtb:name è mostrato (es.: opentopomap)?
Grazie 
Un saluto
Maurizio Chesi
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-01-21 09:00:01+00:00): ciao,
il riferimento è questo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
il tag name è il nome "ufficiale"
per l'insermento basta modificare il valore name in mtb:name.
purtroppo non conosco mappe che mostrino quel tag, prova a vedere tra queste https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services

saluti Andrea
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-07-27 15:52:30+00:00): ciao,
adesso www.cyclosm.org mostra il tag mtb:name. cyclosm è anche un livello mappa selezionabile direttamente da OSM

saluti Andrea
mauche (2021-07-28 13:37:50+00:00): Grazie Andrea.
Allroads (2020-12-01 12:52:37+00:00): Hoi, je hebt ook de track aan de andere kant van de weg verandert.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/6798434
Commodoortje (2020-12-01 18:54:29+00:00): Mijn excuus, het was al laat en dit was de laatste aanpassing in de changeset. Even niet goed gekeken. Dank voor je alertheid.
Is inmiddels gecorrigeerd.
damjang (2022-01-14 16:18:18+00:00): This fix is wrong. Where you find the name? I also see the wrong name in GoogleMaps...
Name in OSM corrected.
phieV9 (2022-01-14 17:46:03+00:00): Just mailed the county office to get the official street name. Let's see if we get any answer.
damjang (2022-01-14 18:58:18+00:00): You can check also here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.842694018374&lng=13.538615349741&z=17&pKey=925925948141537&focus=photo&x=0.6263029778334994&y=0.4367378880105941&zoom=0.5079365079365079
and https://www.google.com/maps/@45.8425962,13.5384611,3a,15.2y,20.55h,90.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sS79H2K-DEoNt4JdF7P4SMQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
phieV9 (2022-01-17 08:03:33+00:00): You are right. Also got the reply from the county office. Sorry for the mistake.
Betanyahoo (2020-11-30 21:23:51+00:00): Should multipolygons like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11964611 be flattened? This would make the editing less messy, easier for newcomers, etc.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-12-01 02:27:09+00:00): sure, I wouldnt mind flattening them. is there a tool to do it automatically? personally, I found it easier/faster to split large buildings into parts by using multipolygons rather than generating a separate way for each part, but, again, I don't mind using separate ways if there are tools to do it fast
Gregory UKR (2020-12-01 13:24:12+00:00): Доброго дня! Дякую за Ваш вклад по наповненню OpenStreetMap. Зазвичай цифровий номер об'єкта вказується не в назві, а в окремому полі ref (наприклад, як назва вказується "Приватбанк", а не "Приватбанк №1234"). Чим коротша назва, тим ймовірніше вона відобразиться на карті при масштабуванні.
kannix (2021-12-17 11:52:09+00:00): Ahoi, any reason you deleted relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10991920
?
freeExec (2021-12-17 12:05:15+00:00): Потому что нет такого маршрута. Скорее всего, кто-то ошибся и на самом деле хотел создать type=waterway, но он уже создан. Поэтому это отношение следует удалить
kannix (2021-12-17 12:24:25+00:00): anyway, restored. Details on this project:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Europe/E-waterway_network#E_20-_.2F_E_30-_.2F_E_40-_.2F_E_50-_...
lordmcdrake (2020-12-01 20:37:58+00:00): Nie som si úplne istý, ale nevolá sa ten potok Kudlovčanka?
gscholz (2021-01-24 08:27:20+00:00): Hi Victor,
here is just an other region were your changesets have left behind broken boundary relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-48.70880&lat=-26.95974&zoom=12

Can you please fix this as well?

Kind Regards
Guido
Tomas Straupis (2020-11-30 22:34:37+00:00): Peržiūrėjau pakeitimą. Viskas gerai, tik Nemirsetos paplūdimio tašką išėmiau, nes Nemirsetos paplūdimys ir taip jau buvo pažymėtas.
xronos (2020-11-30 22:32:26+00:00): в ваших рассуждениях есть внутреннее логическое противоречие: если тэги оспариваемы и неодобрены -- они не могут оказывать влияние на навигацию, потому что разработчики навигаторов такие теги не учитывают. А если они оказывают влияние на навигацию, значить они общеприняты. 
	
	Полагаю, есть идет о теге maxspeed:practical=*
	Ну так он описан в статье:
	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxspeed
	
	в русскоязычной версии - обратите внимание.
charl3s (2020-12-01 22:11:18+00:00): Dlaczego usunięto access=no? Droga chyba jeszcze nie jest otwarta
eggie (2020-11-30 22:39:56+00:00): Dag Bas  Een naam kan natuurlijk wel op de buildingshape, maar niet het adres, Als het goed is... is er al een adresnode aanwezig.
Adres dus verwijderen van het gebouw. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt dan kun je dat doorgeven aan het kadaster via hun eigen site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Professor%20Weberlaan%204&resultOffset=0&objectId=0213200000008736&geometry.x=202593.278&geometry.y=457876.584&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0213010000007911
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-30 22:42:46+00:00): Maar inderdaad 
ID
0213100000041501
Bouwjaar
1916
Status
Pand in gebruik
Is ooit verkeerd geweest.
eggie (2020-12-01 07:28:08+00:00): duplikaat adres verwijderd
Mazda05 (2020-12-06 22:25:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Классификация_дорог_(голосование)
Admasawi (2020-12-08 23:42:28+00:00): Привет Mazda05, спасибо за ссылку. Я теперь вижу в описании «highway = trunk», что он подходит для «дороги к международному аэропорту и крупным портам». Когда я вносил правку, я рассматривал только протяженность трассы А-157.
Рассмотрев текущие данные, мне не совсем понятно, использование классификацее «highway = trunk_link». Почему (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865710362) является trunk_link, а (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24919923) - нет? А как насчет (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53565546) по сравнению с (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53565548)?
Спасибо,
Admasawi
Mazda05 (2020-12-13 11:26:22+00:00): Скорректировал 24919923, 53565546, 53565548
Admasawi (2020-12-15 14:55:54+00:00): Спасибо за информацию
parsd51 (2020-12-01 10:18:15+00:00): Hej anton2004

Det ser ud til at vi er flere lokalkendte i området :-)

Måden at angive construction på, vil føre til at der rutes over vejen, så jeg vil anbefale at tilbageføre det til det foregående.

Hilsen
parsd51
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-30 22:58:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 94995181, 94995336.
aceman444 (2025-02-23 19:17:01+00:00): Zase pochybne zmeny, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35070366 je dodnes obytnou zonou (a bola aj predtym nez ste to zmenili).
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-26 22:19:18+00:00): If "streetview" was google, you can't use that as it's copyrighted.
olo81 (2021-02-07 21:16:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/259439615
czy tutaj jest pomnik, tablica, nagrobek?
Nanosimy miejsca które można znaleźć w terenie. Jeśli to nagrobek to trzeba to otagować 
historic=tomb 
jeśli nie ma nic to to wywalenia
kubahahaha (2021-02-07 21:41:58+00:00): Oj nie wiem, ja tylko dodawałem subject:wikidata=*
Ten pomnik jest tam oznaczony już od 13 lat, ja go nie dodawałem. Jeśli masz wątpliwości to lepiej chyba utworzyć uwagę w tym miejscu i tam zapytać, bo ja nie jestem w stanie odpowiedzieć na to pytanie
olo81 (2021-02-07 22:52:04+00:00): przepraszam, nie spojrzałem w historie zmian
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-12 06:31:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3524040162/history chyba subject:wikidata=Q81745789 będzie właściwe...
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-12 06:33:32+00:00): Chyba wiele http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnCJzdWJqZWN0OsSta2lkxJRhIiA9IFEzNiDEuiBQb2xhbmTFiMKdCiovCltvdcWSanNvbl1bdGltZcWxxZIyNV07Ci8vIGZldMWCIMSwxYAgxYjCnMWkxabFqMWqxJvEq8S_xYHFg8S6Cnt7xJBvY29kZUFyxYA6xpLFp2R9fS0-LsaYcsWCxqXFgMaDxoXEj8SUxJ1yIMamxYxsdHMKKAogIMa3cXXEksSaxKNydMaHb3I6xo_FicWLxY3Fj8WRxZNpxZXFl3TFmT3FnjbFqseEIG7GomVbx5XFjsWQxZLFlMWWxZgiPSLHoCJdKMaNYcawxYDGsmjGtGEpxoPHhXdheceoxYzHqseYx63HnMeex7LFn8e0x7bGpse4xrHGs8iQx7_Ho8amxabFusW2yIXHlserx5nHm8evx7HHs8e1x7fHucaZx73IlciVxrdwxLdux47GvXXGv8eBxb7EmMaiecaDPsaDyLNza2XEvXF0Ow&c=BRgxXI1NaH by zyskało na takiej zmianie...
kubahahaha (2022-06-12 07:27:18+00:00): Kolumna na Wawelu to zdecydowanie masz rację. W ogóle jak tak patrzę na te Q36 to można by więcej uszczegółowić, ale niewygodnie się to robi
user_5359 (2020-12-01 04:10:18+00:00): Hello! Please check the way https://www.osm.org/way/654345400/history: Ich change your tag "(new tag)" = 	"Poste 225/60/22 KV Oujda" to "name" = 	"Poste 225/60/22 KV Oujda"
ovruni (2020-12-01 00:37:03+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en sus ediciones ha agregado vías de parques y áreas de grass que no parecen ir de acorte a la realidad, lo que no permite cumplir con el criterio de verificabilidad de OSM. Por este motivo he revertido sus ediciones.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 01:13:00+00:00): Hi,

Do you have any official Russian/Armenian/Azeri source that confirms the status of Lachin corridor? 

It's actually been a point of confusion for us, and that's why we gave it to Azerbaijan for now, awaiting confirmation. But you seem to have switched it to Artaskh.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-01 01:18:22+00:00): This is the map the Russians have: http://eng.mil.ru/en/russian_peacekeeping_forces/infographics.htm
I've also seen on Twitter that the Armenians in Lachin and some of the surrounding villages can stay there
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 01:20:20+00:00): Thanks. 

There was some conflicting news yesterday, Nov 30. Locals were told to evacuate by 6pm, but then the Armenian Mayor of Lachin said no.

So, I wasn't sure.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 01:22:51+00:00): I think it's best to keep it as Azerbaijan (since Azerbaijan is the internationally recognized owner) until tomorrow, when Russians update their daily map, or we get actual videos from inside Lachin city. Then we'll see.

If you remember, Agdam was also included under Russian peacekeepers in the map, until after the withdrawal date.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-01 01:25:04+00:00): Ok yeah that makes sense. You can change it back.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-02 10:51:31+00:00): Hey, updating you on this situation. We got clarity yesterday, with Aliev in a speech stating that "Lachin city will be returned AFTER a bypass road is constructed, as is stated in the treaty"

so it's certain that until then, Lachin corridor will be Artsakh
Trevor_1 (2020-12-02 18:21:40+00:00): Ok got it, thanks!
abakus_uploader (2020-12-01 23:32:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
DaxServer (2021-01-02 16:07:53+00:00): Hi. I don't think we have a ford=yes feature here. How did you determine to add this tag here for the canal?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95074134
Creator13 (2020-12-06 17:11:04+00:00): Hey, I noticed you deleted some forests in this changeset surrounding the golf course. They are still there on imagery. Why did they have to go?
Creator13 (2020-12-06 17:21:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95374321
I also fixed some of the topology of the golf courses. There were lots of overlapping polygons where the green and fairways meet...
Also, there is very high quality imagery available that is slightly older than Bing but absolutely more usable to trace features very accurately. Please consider Esri World Imagery when mapping in cities in New Brunswick.
kevin benoit (2020-12-06 17:30:11+00:00): Honestly I've been trying to add the golf course to the gold club 2019 to have it playable and the forests where causing me alot of trouble. They where not matching well with the Lidar data that the government of new brunswick provides.
Creator13 (2020-12-06 17:33:06+00:00): Removing data because it's in the way isn't usually a good practice. Do you have a source for the Lidar data? I traced them from Esri data (which also comes from the NB gov't).
kevin benoit (2020-12-06 17:38:45+00:00): https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a6d24f0cc5f149dfb8b569c4ab8aa9f4

I can trace back the forests now if you'd like
Creator13 (2020-12-06 17:47:59+00:00): I'll check out the data and restore them. I've got some experience getting old versions of objects back.
Creator13 (2020-12-06 17:49:26+00:00): Also, I did some research and it looks like this data is (as for now) incompatible with the ODbL we are using. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada_Building_Import#Compatible_Licences
Creator13 (2020-12-06 18:12:47+00:00): I've almost got the changeset ready but before I add them back though, can you confirm the woods are indeed there in the real world?
Creator13 (2020-12-06 20:47:59+00:00): I've reverted the deleted forests. In any case, your contribution is absolutely valued but I just noticed some errors in it. A tip for future edits is to check out notes and history of surrounding items. Usually you can learn a great deal about the intent of the mappers that came before.
mateov (2020-12-02 18:27:00+00:00): According to Michigan legislation this naming only pertains to the part of I-275 "north of the Livonia intersection of I-275 and I-96" http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-250-1051
Can you please change to reflect this?
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:57:59+00:00): I thought it was the official highway name.
ajsorensen (2020-12-01 01:40:01+00:00): All boundary nodes for the Heritage Southwest Estates are referenced from this survey marker
ajsorensen (2020-12-01 01:42:14+00:00): All nodes (there are zero unnecessary nodes) are calculated via the survey marker at the south end of the boundary.
I believe that my nodes are more correct for the Wellsville boundary than the originals.