piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-11-18 10:35:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You paint a new way over a existing street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53411280). And the name "P-1302 Access Road to Soccer Park (RRE Homeowner Association)“ isn’t a name, this is a description! What is wrong with the highway "Eastridge Drive NE"?
SusanWi (2016-11-18 21:12:36+00:00): According to the Redmond Ridge East plat, Eastridge Drive ends at the roundabout where it connects to 244th Place NE.  The section of road to the south/southeast of the roundabout is an access road on parcel 720322-0620 that belongs to the Redmond Ridge East homeowners association.  It is not an extension of Eastridge Drive NE so I was actually trying to remove it and create the new access road P-1302.  The plat refers to 720322-0620 as "Tract P-1302" so I referred to the road as P-1302 with a note that it is the property of the RRE HOA.
The significance of the road is that the new Redmond Ridge East elementary school is supposed to be built on parcel 720310-2310 on the southwest side of access road P-1302. Note that there is no direct public road access to the elementary school property, although there is an easement for the school to use road P-1302, getting to the school property requires crossing private land using an easement.  
How would I shorten Eastridge Drive NE so that it ends at the roundabout? I'm trying to figure this out.  Any advice would help.
(Also, I didn't know that my changes were actually sent out -  I thought I had to publish after my work was finalized.  I'll be more careful in the future.)
Carnildo (2016-11-19 20:20:59+00:00): Since you're using the iD editor, you can split a road into two parts by clicking on the road, then shift-clicking on the dot at the appropriate place to split the road (if there isn't one, you can drag the nearest triangle icon on the road to create one).  Then, click the "scissors" icon on the menu that appears or hit the "x" key.  You can now adjust the parts of the road independently.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 10:39:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:10:54+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
DenisJu (2017-02-11 18:07:21+00:00): Përshëndetje Anisa,
një user ka bërë një report sikur ndërtesa nuk ekziston më, pasi që e ke piketuar ti.
Mund ta shohësh pak!
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/817283#map=18/41.36169/19.77177
AnisKoutsi (2017-02-14 13:49:59+00:00): Pershendetje Denis, 
ndertesa ne fjale ne momentin qe e shtova une ekzistonte, per shkak se ishte ndertim pa leje brenda territorit te universitetit u prish brenda nje afati te shkurter (doli dhe ne media).
maraf24 (2016-11-18 19:16:36+00:00): Chyba chodziło o private, a nie permissive?
jc86035 (2016-11-18 10:15:16+00:00): – Variable speed limits are tagged according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed. Hyphen, unfortunately, isn't allowed because it's not very useful when read by an app
– These roads had the right classification before
– The surface tag isn't really meant for beaches; it's usually for roads.
jc86035 (2016-11-18 10:17:09+00:00): Also, the curve in Castle Peak Road does not exist there (Bing/Mapbox satellite imagery).
MMN-o (2016-11-19 00:06:10+00:00): I mean operator:wikidata .)
ff5722 (2016-11-18 11:21:46+00:00): This area is undergoing reconstruction. Be careful that you are not wasting time on drawing buildings that have already been demolished. 

You can compare with more recent Google Maps imagery (do not trace, only compare!) to see if parts are demolished.

https://www.google.nl/maps/place/Lanzhou,+Gansu,+China/@36.0652082,103.8614658,762m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x365a90b5990c3983:0x914c002e5d0d245c!8m2!3d36.061089!4d103.834304?hl=en
jaap de vries (2017-06-01 09:01:26+00:00): Je hebt midden in een woonwijk een akker toegevoegd mbv BAG update (Grote Kerkstraat nr 57 Wijk en Aalburg). Zelfs op ruimtelijke plannen zie ik dat hier geen akker is, http://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/web-roo/roo/bestemmingsplannen?tabFilter=ACTUEEL . Kan je me uitleggen waarom je dit hebt gedaan?
de vries (2017-06-01 09:54:35+00:00): Over welke akker hebben wij het hier als ik vragen mag?
jaap de vries (2017-06-01 09:58:31+00:00): aan de grote kerkstraat bij nr 57, daar heb je een akker geplaatst terwijl dit tuinen zijn o.a. met een zwembad erin.
de vries (2017-06-01 10:29:14+00:00): Ik zie geen akker daar. Plaats even een linkje naar het object dat je bedoeld.
Weet je btw zeker dat ik die akker heb toegevoegd? Of ben ik gewoon de laatste geweest die hem bewerkt heeft?
jaap de vries (2017-06-01 11:19:02+00:00): zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86594588/history
de vries (2017-06-01 13:16:57+00:00): Ik ga er van uit dat je vraag hiermee beantwoord is.
EugenyN (2016-11-19 10:13:57+00:00): тут какая-то ошибка. что такое "Гора" и улица "горная" 323 ?
keder (2016-11-30 15:19:49+00:00): Откатил.
EugenyN (2016-11-30 15:24:27+00:00): спасибо
Владимир К (2017-03-13 10:56:23+00:00): Вы расставили кучу точек с названием, но не указали тп магазина/заведения. такие точки никогда никем не будут найдены.
mueschel (2016-11-20 13:25:38+00:00): Hi,
I found keys like BlockNumber, City, Neighbourhood and
Prefecture on many nodes in your changesets. These are not used in any other place.
Could you change them to the common tagging, i.e. addr:blocknumber, addr:neighbourhood, addr:prefecture and addr:city? These are the only tags that are understood by software and can be found e.g. in the search box on osm.org

Cheers, Jan
Nakaner (2016-12-18 22:15:55+00:00): Hallo ulrichg,

in diesem und anderen Änderungssätzen in halb Europa hast du Eisenbahngleise mit Staatsgrenzen verbunden. Hast du dir die Grenzen vor Ort angesehen? Oder woher weißt du, dass die Eigentümergrenze direkt an der Grenze liegt?

Es ist nicht gern gesehen, wenn Objekte, die keine Grenzen sind, mit Grenzen verbunden werden (von Grenzflüssen abgesehen). Durch die Verbindung mit anderen Objekten wird nur die Gefahr erhöht, dass ein Newbie die eh schon fragilen Konstrukte beschädigt. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53173&p=26

Außerdem möchte ich dich bitten, künftig aussagekräftigere Änderungssatzkommentare zu verwenden. " Ergänzungen" ist kein aussagekräftiger Kommentar. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments Zudem ist es unfreundlich, außerhalb des deutschen Sprachgebiets, deutschsprachige Änderungssatzkommentare zu verwenden. Bitte verwende dort Englisch oder die Landessprache.

Viele Grüße

Michael
literan (2016-11-18 11:28:12+00:00): Наталья, зачем вы сдвинули дом, который был размещен точно, по привязанному снимку? я откатываю правку.
Наталья Бурага (2016-11-18 11:55:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, правку вносила не я. Извините, сотрудник говорит, что по нашей документации расстояние между 2-мы домами должно быть на 4-е метра меньше, поэтому подвинул дом
literan (2016-11-18 12:58:14+00:00): может быть, ошибка в документации? вот я открыл еще раз, оба дома (22 к2 и 4) четко по фундаментам прорисованы, по спутниковому снимку. Кстати, если это не секрет, вы для каких целей OSM используете?
Наталья Бурага (2016-11-18 15:51:29+00:00): У нас есть посадка зданий из МГГТ. Занимаемся нанесением собственных ЛКС на карту города, используя в качестве подложки Вашу программу.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-14 19:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46087845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits
RobJN (2016-11-18 17:01:52+00:00): My colleague at work is overly excited about the fact this is open now. He's "jumping around like a puppy that's seen some food and another puppy" (his words)!
RafalR (2017-10-13 10:29:52+00:00): Długo ta rewitalizacja ratusza ma trwać? Bo już od roku tak bez zmian jest wg mapy...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-14 19:32:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46087845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-09 20:02:54+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source of some of the edits in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again.

We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.

If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-14 19:32:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46087845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 19:54:34+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added some things to the middle of the Indian Ocean. Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.
Please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group in data@osmfoundation.org so that we can explain the problem in more detail.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 14:11:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:11:27+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 14:11:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:12:05+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
bdiscoe (2018-06-28 00:14:11+00:00): Bonya, there are major issues with these streams:
1. You are using 4x too many nodes! Run simplifly before uploading, so we don't have to do it for you.
2. You used the wrong tag: these are clearly stream, not river.
3. Most of the stream directions are obviously wrong (uphill).

I am trying to fix it all, but please stop making so much cleanup work for us to do.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 19:09:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
apm-wa (2017-05-28 18:41:31+00:00): Same comment: this is no longer улица Островского.  The street signs all read Aba Annayew kocesi and that should be used, from the drop down menu.  Please stop misaddressing POIs in Ashgabat and use the drop down menu.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-21 19:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43854316 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of changesets using the Geothings 'geoMapTool' that erroneously moved objects thousands of kilometres into the sea.
apm-wa (2017-05-28 18:35:03+00:00): Please use the street names in the drop down menu so that the addresses are routable.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 14:12:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:12:40+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
alphensebezorger (2016-11-18 19:22:35+00:00): Bedankt arvdk, dat ziet er een stuk waarheidsgetrouwer uit. Nog twee puntjes:
Weet je zeker dat ele=1 voor de loopbruggen klopt? Volgens de wiki is dat de hoogte boven zeeniveau, waarschijnlijk bedoelde je de etage.
Het pad (de brug) achter de gebouwen langs mist nog een layer=1 tag, zodat het boven het waterniveau ligt.
arvdk (2016-11-19 10:15:46+00:00): Hoi Alphensebezorger. Bedankt voor je commentaar! Ik zal misschien later vandaag of anders maandag je feedback verwerken. Ik map nog niet zo lang dus qua tags moet ik nog leren. Feedback altijd welkom :)
arvdk (2016-11-19 10:17:45+00:00): By the way, ik twijfelde ook over de loopbrug over het water. Het zit namelijk aan het gebouw vast. Is daar geen betere tag voor dan 'bridge=yes'? 'bridge=boardwalk' komt ook in de buurt, maar het is niet van hout.
arvdk (2016-11-23 17:09:33+00:00): Je feedback is verwerkt. Ik heb ook tags toegevoegd voor een juiste rendering op demo.f4map.com met als gids http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-18 21:13:55+00:00): Hi Cavan_chen, welcome to the OSM project. Could you please describe what you've mapped? You saved many random objets, maybe testdata?
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-18 21:13:48+00:00): Hi Cavan_chen, welcome to the OSM project. Could you please describe what you've mapped? You saved many random objets, maybe testdata?
BharataHS (2016-11-21 06:25:30+00:00): 
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are appreciated. May I know why you deleted streams in this changeset. 

Thank you
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-18 21:13:42+00:00): Hi Cavan_chen, welcome to the OSM project. Could you please describe what you've mapped? You saved many random objets, maybe testdata?
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-18 21:13:36+00:00): Hi Cavan_chen, welcome to the OSM project. Could you please describe what you've mapped? You saved many random objets, maybe testdata?
Marián Kyral (2016-11-25 09:08:01+00:00): Reverted in #43939557

Do addr:housenumber jména nepatří, pouze čísla. Jména domů patří do name=*, ale to jen v případě, že se ten dům takto opravdu jmenuje nebo tam sídlí nějaká firma. Nedává se tam, kdo tam bydlí. Tato data do OSM nepatří.
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-18 21:14:43+00:00): Hi Cavan_chen, welcome to the OSM project. Could you please describe what you've mapped? You saved many random objects, maybe testdata?
Tomas Straupis (2016-11-18 16:07:08+00:00): Atšauktas neteisingas adreso keitimas.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 19:08:48+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
rab (2016-11-18 20:12:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.
In which of these buildings is that office located?
Which of these roads should be named as "Faber Drive"?
Btw. are you this MSF Youtube guy of HOT task 2286?
literan (2016-11-19 10:43:49+00:00): нафига удаляешь дороги? на ней все необходимые теги стояли, что на авто проезд запрещен. Не вандаль!
metatech (2018-05-18 20:25:05+00:00): Hello,
I noticed that you removed the 2 names for each side of this street :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92242671
Did you see anything new during a survey ?
If no, what is the source of your change ?
Thanks,
metatech
Sanniu (2026-01-15 11:13:30+00:00): Hi, do you have an idea what are street names for these build numbers?
Adding street names will facilitate search.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-24 14:42:17+00:00): Hi,
It looks like one of the nodes of Tottenham Court Road got accidentally dragged to the west in this changeet.  I've tried to fix it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43921835 - does that look OK to you now?  The underlying "standard layer" tiles will take a little while to update (https://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/19/261949/174310.png still looks wrong as I write this) but the underlying data looks OK, and other map tiles based on the same data look OK too.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2016-11-18 23:25:39+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
katpatuka (2016-11-18 14:40:22+00:00): it's better to add the tags to the relations but the single ways; for the ways source tag is enough ;)
literan (2016-11-19 11:00:00+00:00): ты уверен, что его там нет? еще две недели назад он там был, в подвале: https://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=10&ll=37.64616251247251%2C55.75955074191457&pa=87.1&pp=37.6461651%2C55.7595496
trigpoint (2016-12-07 00:02:06+00:00): Should be fixed
KKS (2016-11-23 22:30:30+00:00): Привіт, якщо Соборна - пішохідна, то як дістатись до внутріщнього дворику по service дорозі машиною?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43768157#map=18/50.90876/34.79967
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
muralito (2016-11-19 01:43:25+00:00): ¿Que criterio usaste para las 6 lanes en 18 de Julio?
muralito (2016-11-19 01:49:53+00:00): Estoy encontrando varios errores en estos cambios. O el reconocimiento KG 2016 esta fallando o lo estan interpretando con un criterio distinto al convenido, por ejemplo la cantidad de "lanes" que etiquetan.
literan (2016-11-19 10:38:21+00:00): В половине точек выбран неправильный тип объекта. Будьте ,пожалуйста, внимательнее.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-04-25 10:15:05+00:00): You added a few untagged nodes here...
Sander H (2016-12-13 18:53:05+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, Als je het niet erg vind heb ik de tunnel weer van richting omgezet. Beide delen stonden tegen het verkeer in te wijzen. Ik merkte ineens dat m'n routeplanner me over de brug wilde sturen ;)
gr. Sander
JJJWegdam (2016-12-13 22:57:10+00:00): Beste Sander,
bedankt voor de correctie en excuses voor het ongemak. Ik hoop dat de detaillering van het Rotterdamse havengebied waar ik de afgelopen tijd mee bezig ben geweest verder goed bevalt.
Mvg,
Jeroen
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-04-25 10:15:29+00:00): `leisure=park` should be on an area, not a node
literan (2016-11-19 11:09:00+00:00): а зачем убрал? по правилам как раз положено с ним. Откатываю.
MCDA (2017-04-16 15:21:42+00:00): Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line?  

It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense.  Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp
VictorIE (2017-04-16 18:50:16+00:00): This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138

I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.

It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.eirgrid.com/#all/transmission-map

It may be that it is designed for 110kV, but operating at 33kV.

Note that power=minor_line is anything under 100kV.
MCDA (2017-04-16 23:08:48+00:00): NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen.
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:18:52+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
Зелёный Кошак (2016-11-23 16:43:45+00:00): Доброго времени. Подскажите, пожалуйста, что именно вы хотели отметить, как укрытие, почти посередине перекрёстка?

----------------------------
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение" вашего пакета правок(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43772054).
muralito (2016-11-19 00:48:07+00:00): Muy probable que o quisiste mapear otra cosa o quedo mal ubicado.  Tiene poco sentido un cajero en esta ubicacion.
Hjart (2016-11-18 17:06:17+00:00): Please note that this wasn't Bing imagery, but still ok though