piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AndresDuhour (2021-06-01 10:06:30+00:00): Buen día! 
Quería consultarle si sabe cuál es el nombre correcto, si Los Sauces o Los Saucos para la calle. Saludos!
Andrés
eggie (2017-07-28 13:41:41+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
MKnight (2019-02-03 22:06:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5000000000

nice ;)
villainsurgentes_12 (2017-07-29 17:18:30+00:00): es informacion
Hjart (2017-07-28 19:25:24+00:00): Du overså at kalkgruberne allerede var angivet 300 m mod øst. Derfor har jeg slettet din version.
GinaroZ (2017-07-28 21:03:40+00:00): Hi, just wondering if you could explain why you've changed many hamlets to villages? For example I don't think place https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3910707265 is a village according the OSM definition or normal usage.
literan (2017-07-31 12:07:19+00:00): добрый день! для объектов культурного наследия есть свой тег: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage В name это точно не стоит писать (name - оно для "Дом Такого-то" скорее). Поправлю.
mueschel (2017-08-01 19:45:39+00:00): Hi,
could uou check the roads you added here?
15 of them have only strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511074247
MiroJanosik (2017-08-01 07:30:13+00:00): Ahoj, tuto si pridal "source=kapor2; ropiky.net" nie len na liniu bunkrov, ale aj na vsetky body bunkrov. Odtial by si to mohol vymazat, kazdy roh bunkra nemusi mat 'source' :)

Snad to pojde jednoducho cez nejaku funkciu vybratia vsetkych bodov a odstranenia source. Ak by si s tym mal tazkosti napis mi, pomozem. Miro
radek-drlicka (2017-08-01 13:52:27+00:00): Ahoj, děkuji za upozornění, vymažu :)
eggie (2017-07-28 16:22:19+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-28 16:28:22+00:00): In Holland braucht bicycle =yes und foot=yes nicht zu "taggen". 
Das isst default.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Grün isst default.
GinaroZ (2017-07-28 14:32:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. 
Noticed you've added some footpaths, however some of these don't connect to other features. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5000037508 - this needs to be connected to the road so that users can be routed to along the path.
Also, when adding buildings, make sure you use press the S key to use the "square" function to fix the corners.
Cheers
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-31 21:46:54+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50733982
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-31 21:46:37+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50733982
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-31 21:43:10+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50733982
eggie (2017-07-28 16:20:55+00:00): reverted.. no artwork present here.
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-31 21:46:45+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50733982
eggie (2017-07-28 16:36:12+00:00): Liever geen adresnode aanbrengen met streetcomplete. 
Het huisnummer komt zonder verdere gegevens op het gebouw zelf. 
Huisnummers horen/staan al  op de BAG adresnode.
Hier heb ik de adresnode hersteld.
mariotomo (2020-09-27 15:54:38+00:00): Hola Jose Oberto.  te voy a cambiar el "fitness centre" en "sports centre", y si quieres encuentras una comunidad de maperos panameños en Telegram y en el forum#61.
MMN-o (2017-07-28 20:58:08+00:00): I meant shop=car service=tyres of course .)
smootheFiets (2020-08-20 22:07:30+00:00): Hi AnkEric,
I'm as confused as you are about the G11 sign you tagged as 'fixme' (node 5000167202).  It's still standing there as of 2020-06-01 (see Mapillary, user ezinge is Yours Truly).  There's another G11 at the end of the SE way, 354193007, so I tagged that way as G11.  I left the NE way G13 as per the sign on the far end, but mofa traffic coming from the SE has no reason to believe they're not allowed there.  Unsatisfactory...
Next question: the SW way, 678009790.  It was tagged as 'footway' but there's nothing in the way of a G7.  BGT calls it 'fietspad'.  I've tagged it as path for lack of better ideas.  Some day I'll have to bike there and check it out -- and further SW along the canal, which all looks plenty cyclable from aerial imagery but is tagged as footway (onbegroeid terreindeel on BGT).
Any ideas?
DENelson83 (2020-02-28 02:49:47+00:00): Are you sure that address for the 108 Mile Supermarket is correct?
zstadler (2017-08-01 16:24:31+00:00): Hi,
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398602061 was no tags. should it be deleted?
zstadler (2021-07-11 17:29:09+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50763780
gileri (2017-07-30 11:31:27+00:00): Dans ce changeset, vous avez retiré les tags :
- Indiquant que c'est un hôtel (du coup il n’apparaît même plus dans la plupart des cartes et applications)
- Donnant le site web de l'hôtel
- Le fait qu'il soit climatisé

C'est incroyable que des bénévoles fassent du meilleur travail que vous sur OSM, et que vous supprimiez leur travail (gratuit!) et en conséquence dégradez fortement le référencement de vos clients...

Je jette l'éponge, je continuerais à corriger vos erreurs si elles dégradent OSM, mais n'espérez plus aucune amélioration des objets de vos clients de ma part.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-07-31 07:28:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement, nous nous sommes aperçus de ce problème, et nous allons corriger cela au fur et à mesure.

Merci de votre compréhension
eggie (2017-07-28 18:44:33+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-28 20:55:25+00:00): Op verzoek even geholpen met alles op de juiste plek te krijgen.
muziriana (2017-07-28 15:58:34+00:00): wrong changeset comment added accidently
ndm (2017-07-28 18:37:24+00:00): I think "name" is supposed to be an official name, ideally signposted -- this looks a bit more like a "description". Similarly, with some of the buildings too.
nljacob58 (2017-07-30 11:26:26+00:00): Sander
Volgens mij ben je te vroeg met deze BAG update. Het betreffende blok heb ik eerder uit de update gehaald die op mijn verzoek Was geïmporteerd. 
Dit blok moet nog in de verkoop gaan. Ik verwacht dit jaar geen bouwactiviteiten i.t.t. De andere blokken waar de fundering ligt en gestart Is met de muren.
Vriendelijke groet 
Jaap
Sander H (2017-07-30 12:23:28+00:00): De gemeente heeft begin mei de status veranderd van `vergunning verleend` naar `bouw gestart`.
Indien dat niet klopt kun je hier een terugmelding doen zodat ze de volgende keer niet weer mee komen:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=0396100100024304&resultOffset=0&objectId=0556100000015058&geometry.x=75899.3210375&geometry.y=437707.7250875&zoomlevel=5&detailsObjectId=0556010000017926
nljacob58 (2017-08-01 09:30:16+00:00): Huizenblok Santplaet 198-214 verwijderd met changeset #50745075. BAG terugmelding gedaan.
Ik houd in de gaten wanneer bouw start (woon er naast ;-)
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-29 09:45:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50668081 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 50653423: personal favourite locations/fictional data by a MAPS.ME user. This data does not belong into OpenStreetMap.
daveemtb (2017-09-07 13:35:56+00:00): This changeset seems to include new ways that duplicate those already in place. :(
daveemtb (2017-09-07 13:48:51+00:00): I have started removing some of the duplicates. I'm very puzzled about your mapping process as you seem to be working on a blank map. Please download existing OSM data before adding new ways. Many of the ways in this changeset did not link properly to the other ways in the area.
daveemtb (2017-09-07 13:50:05+00:00): Are you bulk importing rights of way from some other data source? Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines :)
HamsterFangs (2017-09-08 15:29:21+00:00): Dave,
I can't see any duplicates and I'm not bulk importing. Can you point me at a duplicate before you fix it so I can try to see what you mean?
Any additions (e.g. from A 23a to Cow Lane) are done manually using a combination of local knowledge, OS, & Bing Aerial. I'm updating designations based on the ESCC RoW map.
 I'd appreciate any help if I'm causing problems.
BTW - I ride the SDW at least once a year. I do over 10,000km a year on my rigid singlespeed. So I get to see lots of trails.
daveemtb (2017-09-08 15:38:10+00:00): Sure, I'll see if I can find any others and flag them up so you can see them. Am I right to understand that you're using Potlatch? I haven't used that for a long time, but I wonder if there's some editor bug where it isn't downloading everything?
daveemtb (2017-09-08 15:43:53+00:00): You can still currently see the duplicates on the opencyclemap at the following area as it takes a while to update: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93575407#map=15/50.7759/0.1834&layers=C
You can see duplicated bridleways (eg Charleston Bottom) and also cycleways on top of tracks (eg around Newbarn), and footpaths on top of steps (by Westdean). It looks like when you were mapping you couldn't see the existing ways - if it was JOSM, perhaps you hadn't downloaded the area, but with Potlatch I think this is meant to happen automatically?
HamsterFangs (2017-09-08 15:51:10+00:00): Yes, using Potlatch 2.
I found the issue. The Standard layer does not show every track, but the Cycle Map layer does. So, the duplicates are deffo my fault as I knew they were there but could not see them on the settings I was using. I wonder if that's just with my PC - could you have a go with Potlatch and see if you can replicate the issue, please? Any idea how I can raise this with OSM?
HamsterFangs (2017-09-08 16:05:40+00:00): Dammit! I can see the duplicates at zoom 16 and farther out, but if I go to 15 or closer I can only see my own additions. This is for both Potlatch and iD. help!
daveemtb (2017-09-08 16:28:52+00:00): Very weird!! I will see if I can reproduce it! Glad we found the issue, anyway!
daveemtb (2017-09-08 16:32:29+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean by "The Standard layer does not show every track, but the Cycle Map layer does." - can you clarify which layers you are talking about? Thanks :)
daveemtb (2017-09-08 16:35:31+00:00): Think I've got what you mean now - you mean when looking at the map, or a map background in an editor? I deleted the duplicates from this changeset previously. They aren't showing up in the opencyclemap at some zoom levels because the renderer layer because that hasn't been udpated from the underlying data yet. Please see the other changeset that I've commented on this afternoon for one where I haven't fixed the underlying data.
When editing, rely on the data in the editor, not on a background map layer, which may be out of date at high zoom levels. I never use map backgrounds for editing but prefer to use satellite photos as that also helps see what's really on the ground.
Marych_ (2017-07-28 18:01:23+00:00): Hi
how you decide that road geometry is wrong?
Do you have actual gps tracks ?
A Rastered Development (2017-07-31 14:59:02+00:00): I aligned the roads to the new Digital Globe imagery that was added to OSM: http://blog.digitalglobe.com/news/digitalglobe-satellite-imagery-launch-for-openstreetmap/
Marych_ (2017-07-31 15:47:30+00:00):  This is wrong. Any imagery may have an offset.
Alignment should be performed based on GPS tracks.
In My opinion you did unnesesary changes.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database
Every armchair mapper should know that all remotely-sensed imagery (e.g. satellite images and aerial photos) and other sources, except GPS traces, are usually poorly aligned with respect to reality. As a result, the mapper should be able to align the imagery in his preferred editor using GPS traces.
HOTEL&RESTAURANT RIO (2017-07-28 17:06:16+00:00): HOTEL RIO
mar_k83 (2017-07-29 08:52:57+00:00): Bitte löschen, hab mich in der Straße geirrt. Sorry
literan (2017-07-31 11:25:41+00:00): не совсем понял, в чем нужна помощь. Линии будущей дороги я отрисовывал по проекту, привязанному к спутнику (возможно, неточно). Там что-то построили не по проекту? ;-)
eggie (2017-07-28 18:56:30+00:00): building yes / name monumentaal gebouw is geen erkende tag.
historic=yes wordt gebruikt bij historische gebouwen. Nooit name gebruiken, want dan zie je op de kaart "monumentaal gebouw." Kijk in de wiki hij historic.
Ik haal de node weg.
Op een footway nooit beginnen met access=no
foot=yes hoeft ook niet op een voetpad. Dat is "default."
eggie (2017-07-28 19:06:39+00:00): De vreemde nodes heb ik weggehaald van het gebouw. Waar de hoofdingang zit heb ik entrance=yes er van gemaakt.
Het pad langs de begraafplaats zit nog niet vast aan de mons. Aengenentlaan. Nog vastmaken dus. De tags access=no foot=yes van de paden halen. Mocht je er niet mogen komen... dan access=no
footway=sidewalk  Dat is een onbegrijpelijke fout die in editor ID zit. 
Je kunt in OSM geen tags zelf verzinnen. het is dus steeds kijken in de wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen#Wegen
eggie (2017-07-28 19:10:22+00:00): historic=yes (of een andere osm-term) kan op een node of op het gebouw erbij.
eggie (2017-07-28 19:19:03+00:00): Mariëngaarde kan wel met naam op de adresnode. Ik meen dat het een zorgcentrum is.. amenity=nursing_home erbij op de adresnode.
HubMiner (2017-12-08 14:50:04+00:00): Park with a cave entrance overlapping a residential neighborhood - this does not look believable, please check.
Roland5 (2017-11-02 07:53:34+00:00): An dieser Position findet kann ich das Gebäude 511122065 aus diesem Changeset nicht finden. Bist du dir sicher, dass deine Quellen zuverlässig sind?
Kurly (2017-11-03 19:10:28+00:00): Da hab ich mich wohl vertan.

Habe das fraglich Gebäude wieder gelöscht.
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:29:49+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50654776
ma-rt-in (2017-07-31 11:21:10+00:00): Hello Why did you take the L47 from the construction state, but leave the other key in it. In addition, where do you have the proof that the route is finished?
affricdave (2017-07-31 14:14:04+00:00): google maps indicates this route is open, satellite imagery clearly shows traffic flowing. I need to use this route soon but with the road in construction mode route planner sends me elsewhere.  If you know otherwise please advise.

as for the other key, I'm not sure I understand, please expand.
ma-rt-in (2017-07-31 14:25:30+00:00): We Mapper do not use Google Maps as the source for our mapping.
I live a few kilometers away and therefore I know exactly where there is still construction site. Just because you want to use this route does not mean you can simply take it out of the building condition.

The other keys were, for example, the access tag.

I'll reset your changes now.
affricdave (2017-07-31 17:46:54+00:00): my enthusiasm got the better of me I should of checked more thoroughly, sorry for any inconvenience.
Do you know if there is a diversion sign posted to go around via Maring.
ma-rt-in (2017-08-01 06:50:43+00:00): In Germany, all construction site diversions are signposted. Often even for cars and trucks separately.
Snaiperis (2017-08-17 08:41:05+00:00): Klaida. Kulautuvos pėsčiųjų-sveikatingumo takas (node:3483907542). Arba turėtų būti kulautuvoje Kauno raj., arba gal čia koks nors Vepriškų takas...
Tomas Straupis (2017-08-17 08:52:08+00:00): Taip, klaida. Taisau pagal šitą: https://www.valstybiniaimiskai.lt/lt/RekreaciniaiObjektai/Kaunomiskuuredija/Puslapiai/Kulautuvosp%C4%97s%C4%8Di%C5%B3j%C5%B3-sveikatingumotakas.aspx
5m4u9 (2017-08-07 18:17:46+00:00): thanks, but realign only highways make a uggly map... is better realign all elements in around.
geri-oc (2017-10-09 09:50:12+00:00): Eine Frage zum Totensee:
Ist der Name Totesee?
Dieser ist als name=* und  als alt_name=* (alternativer Name) eingetragen. Oder ist es ein alter Name (old_name=*)
Der jetzige Name sollte unter name=* stehen. Grüße Gerd aus Sachsen.
geow (2017-07-31 19:17:44+00:00): Hi e-quadrat, das löschen von mtb:scale=2 war hier nicht ganz korrekt, weil wir in OpenStreetMap physische und zugangsrechtliche Merkmale unabhängig voneinander erfassen.

mtb:scale=* beschreibt die fahrtechnische Schwierigkeit für Mountainbikes, siehe
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale

und zwar unabhängig davon, ob das Befahren offiziell erlaubt ist oder nicht.

Das angebliche Verbot für Fahrräder/MTBs ist bereits mit bicycle=no  erfasst, wobei noch von Interesse wäre, ob dort ein Verbotsschild steht. Das könnte mit traffic_sign=DE:254 gekennzeichnet werden; siehe http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Ich habe mtb:scale=2 für diesen Weg daher wiederhergestellt.

Gruß
geow
e-quadrat (2017-08-02 08:30:47+00:00): Ok. Verstehe.
Grüße, Eckart
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-06 14:20:28+00:00): Esta trilha realmente é mão única? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101891073
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-13 16:54:05+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-13 16:54:25+00:00): Only reverted the house, not the police station.
Nakaner (2017-07-29 10:01:13+00:00): Hallo Uwe Dietrich,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Durch das Ändern der Daten in MAPS.ME hast du zum OpenStreetMap-Projekt beigetragen.

Leider ist die von dir eingegebene Adresse noch unvollständig. Der Straßenname fehlt am Gebäude noch. Könntest du das bitte noch ergänzen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-29 11:14:28+00:00): und falls Ortskenntnis besteht, bitte mal nachsehen, welcher der beiden Straßennamen der L 83 nebenan korrekt ist. Vermutlich Sühlener Straße, aber besser mal nachsehen.
mariotomo (2021-02-28 15:03:06+00:00): Hola!  sigues interesado en OpenStreetMap?  se sigue avanzando, pero sì hacen falta más maperos.
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-29 10:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50668471 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 50657545: suspicious movement of an address node (Scharnitzer Str. 49b, 82166 Gräfelfing) onto a motorway
Nakaner (2017-07-29 10:09:31+00:00): Hallo WHouses,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

ich habe diesen Änderungssatz soeben zurückgesetzt, da ich erheblich Zweifel habe, dass das Haus abgerissen und auf der A 96 neu errichtet wurde.

Viele Grüße

Michael
userJeff (2017-07-28 19:39:21+00:00): park boundary approximate based on park map www.anokacounty.us
Sysem (2017-10-05 11:45:56+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier ein fehlerhaftes PLZ-Gebiet hinzugefügt => http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7426196 - kannst du dieses bitte entfernen? Das korrekte und gesamte PLZ-Gebiet ist hier ja schon vorhanden => http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1122675 - Ich würde mich um eine Rückmeldung sehr freuen, danke
Sysem (2017-10-08 16:36:16+00:00): Ich habe deine PLZ-Relation zu einer Administrative (10) korrigiert, denke das war von dir auch so angedacht => http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7426196
Strubbl (2023-04-25 22:05:26+00:00): Es wäre klasse, wenn du deine Energie in das Entkleben der Flächen von Wegen, wie zB. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306695511 stecken könntest.
eggie (2017-07-29 15:00:47+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd

Graag in je commentaar aangeven wat je edits inhouden.
Øukasz (2017-08-17 19:42:22+00:00): hello, 

you removed ALL the names from this city. this is rather strange. can you fix this mistake?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-27 13:15:06+00:00): Kto wyznacza tą trasę? 

Chodzi mi o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5223205/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-27 13:15:37+00:00): Czy to jest to samo co opisane na http://www.trasasmakoszy.pl/ ?
szydzio (2018-05-27 16:37:41+00:00): Hej Mateusz! Ja tylko nieznacznie poprawiłem sam obiekt (restaurację) ale nie modyfikowałem powiązanej relacji. Jak widać w http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=5223205 pierwotnie relację tą wprowadziła natkof, więc to ona najlepiej mogłaby chyba odpowiedzieć.Pozdr!
5m4u9 (2017-07-28 23:54:31+00:00): buena rory!

creo que esta instalación será  parte del odesur2018.
eggie (2017-07-29 14:56:20+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-29 15:26:31+00:00): Helemaal prima zo lijkt mij.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-02 22:43:07+00:00): Hallo aussicht,

schön dass du dich um die Gebäudebestand in Kirchheim kümmerst. An einigen Stellen entsprechen deine Eintragungen aber nicht dem OSM-Standard, und zwar bei landuse:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:landuse

landuse wird nicht bei Gebäuden benutzt. Dafür gibt es die Werte für bulding. Und was religion=christian an einem Schuppen (letztes Gebäude Am Mühlbach) zu suchen hat, verstehe ich überhaupt nicht :-)
aussicht (2017-08-02 22:49:57+00:00): Hallo TourenbikerFKB,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da hat mir die Autovervollständigung bei den ungetaggten Gebäuden einen Streich gespielt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-03 05:54:28+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Korrektur. Bist du in Kirchheim ortskundig? Ich frage deshalb, weil es bei Eintragungen eines anderen Mappers (gerdipp) Probleme gibt die sich anhand der Luftbilder nicht lösen lassen (Radweg R8, NFZ-Werkstatt Mercedes gegenüber REWE). Du kannst dir ja mal die Kommentare ansehen:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#5/51.152/10.327
Viele Grüße Rainer
Tiamate (2017-07-29 05:17:20+00:00): please don't use OSM for private Remarks.
منزلي
is not a valid housenumber
DD1GJ (2017-07-29 07:06:55+00:00): @wilmaed: please check the whole changeset. The caravan_site at Bergstraße 26 was also garbage. It's now deleted.
derloris (2024-05-14 15:05:21+00:00): Hallo! Hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4245682
...kam gerade die Frage auf, ob noch auf beiden Straßenseiten WGs der MA11 sind, weil offenbar nur (mehr?) beim Gebäude auf der südl. Seite eine Beschilderung besteht. Weißt du da zufällig Bescheid? LG
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 21:55:28+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
Pigna00 (2020-01-01 13:23:19+00:00): La posizione è corretta ma l’indirizzo non è corretto
keithonearth (2017-07-28 23:25:39+00:00): The way representing the canal I extended is in the opposite direction of the one it meets. As an irrigation canal this would have a direction of flow, so it makes sense that the way should match it, but I don't know which is the correct direction.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-30 22:02:13+00:00): Sam numer to za mało. Przydałaby się ulica i miasto.
nammala (2017-08-01 05:35:49+00:00): Hi,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding parks over the buildings . OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth not random data. Please don't add fictional data on the map.

Regards,
nammala
Glassman (2017-07-29 05:33:52+00:00): Your edit was deleted. If you need help with OSM editing let me know.
daganzdaanda (2017-09-12 16:29:12+00:00): Hello Danhthanhnguyen94,
The tags here really do not make any sense:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4885328114
What were you trying to map?
Please look for fitting tags on the wiki or just ask!
muralito (2017-08-01 00:42:38+00:00): Hola sabisuli.
Los ways OSM que representan vias de transito (calles, peatonales, sendas, bicisendas, etc) deben conectarse (compartir un punto comun) para que sean utiles a los ruteos y no como una cosa aislada, de la que nada entra o nada sale.
muralito (2017-08-01 00:58:46+00:00): Quise decir, si en el mundo real estan conectadas, tambien debieran estarlo en OSM...
sabiusli (2017-08-01 01:35:04+00:00): Ok, la extendí, da una mejor idea de su utilidad, aún cuando en la realidad dan a la acera y no a la calle.
gscholz (2019-04-20 06:45:57+00:00): Hi Gilmar,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate segments:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-53.07512&lat=-29.77055&zoom=17

Can you please fix this?

Guido