piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2022-10-09 13:26:32+00:00): Hola Fer25, cuando un objeto que tiene dirección deja de funcionar y este tiene etiquetas de edificio o dirección, entonces se eliminan las etiquetas relacionadas al negocio, de esta forma no se pierden las etiquetas de edificio o dirección. En este caso he recuperado la dirección.
Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-28 03:59:46+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141844958
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-28 03:59:47+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141844958
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
GinaroZ (2022-10-09 13:15:33+00:00): Is this still an active phone box? (if not the amenity tag should be removed)
Scout Jens (2024-01-03 11:42:29+00:00): Hallo, wie kommst Du darauf, dass die Trampelpfade für Fahrräder und Pferde gesperrt sind?
pd8JUHyoPJ (2024-01-04 06:08:47+00:00): Hallo, Fahradfahren & Reiten ist legal nach dem Landesnaturschutzgesetz RLP möglich, (Zitat) "soweit sich Wege dafür eignen ..." - und dafür sind mir (subjektiv natürlich) die Wege zu schmal. Ich stelle mir bei der Einstufung immer die Frage: Willst du selbst wirklich als ortsunkundiger (!) Radfahrer über einen solchen Trampelpfad vom Navi geroutet werden? Ich sage da klar: Nein!
VG Rolf
pd8JUHyoPJ (2024-01-04 06:09:26+00:00): Fortsetzung: Zusätzlich gilt hier - zumindest im Bereich des LSG, dass das Reiten auf Trampelpfaden gem. der Rechtsverordnung über das Landschaftsschutzgebiet "Roßlache" verboten ist.
VG Rolf
Scout Jens (2024-01-15 07:11:35+00:00): Danke für Deine Antwort. Wenn örtliche Bestimmungen den Zugang mit dem Rad verbieten, dann tragen wir das natürlich so ein. Ich kenne dabei auch die Problematik, das abzuwägen. Z.B. Was ist ein befestigter Weg im Sinne der Regel zum NSG?
Der andere Grund gefällt mir nicht. Wenn es um meine Vorlieben beim Radfahren ginge, würde ich zum Teil auch anders mappen. Ich fahre zum Beipiel gerne mal einen schmalen Pfad.
Was beim Routing hilft, sind möglichst viele (konktere und richtige) Infos: Oberfläche und Oberflächenglätte z.B.
Mein Navi führt mich im Zweifel immer zuerst über einen glatten Asphalt mit dem Rad, auch wenn der Weg dadurch etwas länger ist.
Frans S (2022-10-09 12:01:36+00:00): Hello. See my comment on changeset 127221764 about duplicated buildings
Best regards
Frans S (2022-10-12 14:45:23+00:00): Hello.  You mapped these tall buildings not correctly
See this picture how to map these buildings.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Gqwm5DXZSsQDFCFJ7RlFcDJv2yp_h2H/view?usp=sharing

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127231755
Mishari (2022-11-28 03:56:18+00:00): Hi Krittt

Please kindly be more careful when mapping from satellite. The road below doesn't exist on the ground and the tagging scheme is incorrect.

จะให้ผมอธิบายเป็นภาษาไทยไหมครับ?
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-09 14:17:00+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
gscholz (2022-10-12 05:47:23+00:00): Hi Dinushaka Samith,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127232411

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please apply JOSM validator before you upload such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
Marc_ch (2022-10-31 11:45:56+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the improvement.
unfortunately the schoolyard is under construction for several weeks, so I advise you to wait before editing this place because the final layout is not yet very clear

what's the source for the area of "CO of Diomdidier" ? it's a funny one.

Regards,
Marc
imagoiq (2022-10-31 11:59:34+00:00): Hello Marc,

My initial goal was just to map the Aula, and then I saw this pattern and I could stop myself anymore! 😃

Thanks for the info and I hope to meet you one day, I've seen that you are very active in this area. I mostly worked on Cheyres until Payerne since last year.
imagoiq (2022-11-01 09:34:25+00:00): About your last question, don't hesitate to change it. Source was swisstopo aerial imagery.
ivanbranco (2022-10-09 09:23:11+00:00): Ciao Pasquale, 

hai mappato due toilette come stabilimenti termali:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9796574245
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9812249643

forse volevi usare "amenity=toilets". Ricordati inoltre anche che non si usano nomi descrittivi come "Bagni Pubblici".

Buon mapping
PasqualeD (2022-10-09 09:26:51+00:00): Si si ok
ivanbranco (2022-10-09 09:29:12+00:00): riesci a correggerli prima di procedere con altri edit?
skyper (2023-01-25 17:25:27+00:00): Hallo travelhike,
selbe Frage wie in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125359844, ist das ein Fernsehturm:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10086450838

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
Frans S (2022-10-13 10:30:16+00:00): Hello. A few issues here.
Never tag a road as path when it is Apr. 8 mtr wide.  Here, residential is a better tag.
You moved nodes of the main road to a wrong position. 
I corrected them
Best regards
Carto'Cité (2022-12-12 17:26:13+00:00): Salut Nzau,
J'ai enlevé les panneaux C115 de certains chemins car j'ai un gros doute sur leur présence :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237900737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101879967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237901785
Si je me suis trompé et que tu en as observé très récemment dis-moi et je les remettrai.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-12 19:36:52+00:00): Salut Charles,
Effectivement tu as bien fait comme pour le reste j'attends de retourner sur place avec ma caméra pour pouvoir en être certain mais merci.
Bonne soirée
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-10-09 09:51:09+00:00): Solbjerg Plads: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/20f573ed-2d80-3509-e053-d480220ade75/Solbjerg%20Plads
Osmwithspace (2023-02-23 17:54:29+00:00): This seams more like a hiking track to me.
mx-5_ler (2023-02-24 08:22:43+00:00): it stays still as a hiking track, just added additionaly the mtb scale
Osmwithspace (2023-02-24 10:50:39+00:00): No, you changed route=hiking to route=mtb in the relation with this changeset. So I will change it now.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12033428
Osmwithspace (2023-02-24 10:52:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132961979
eggie (2022-10-09 08:54:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  amenity=drinking_water toevoegen zorgt voor rendering van het object. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
tastrax (2022-10-24 02:42:23+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2022-10-24 02:46:27+00:00): You might also like to assist in fixing such mistakes via the following MapRoulette challenge https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/4409
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-13 10:47:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127236580
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-13 13:05:01+00:00): Z drzewami pięknie to wygląda
Константин Гам (2022-11-01 09:00:17+00:00): Будьте внимательны! В своих исправлениях вы уничтожили актуальную информацию.
MxxCon (2022-10-10 03:53:08+00:00): Hello.
When mapping buildings, you can right click on them and select "Make Square". That will make those buildings have right angles, which allows it to more closely represent the reality and makes your mapping look cleaner.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127237727
demon_box (2022-10-09 10:44:38+00:00): ciao, su questo nodo:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9789594193/history#map=17/45.86000/10.23775

ho alcune segnalazioni da farti:
non puoi mettere amenity=fountain + tourism=picnic_site + 
+ name="Fontanile de moòl" tutto su un unico nodo e per giunta posizionato (attaccato) sulla highway=track!!

questi oggetti (area pic-nic e fontana) saranno a destra o a sinistra della strada non di certo in mezzo! e poi x favore distingui la fontana dall'area pic-nic con 2 nodi distinti.
GRAZIE e BuonMapping!
--enrico
maraf24 (2022-10-19 07:56:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127727500
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
LockOnGuy (2022-10-11 07:00:10+00:00): Use good changeset comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127239021
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
maraf24 (2022-10-19 07:53:05+00:00): Cześć.
Czy jest tabliczka w terenie? W OSM tylko to się liczy, a nie jakaś ustawa.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-10 16:33:42+00:00): Moin 
wäre cool, wenn du solche edits auf geografisch besser zusammenhängende Änderungen aufteilen könntest :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Cheers
silversurfer83