piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2018-01-06 12:38:31+00:00): Hvor har du rundkørslen Sortebjergvej/Koldingvej fra? Den er afgjort ikke på hverken skærmkort eller SDFE luftfotos, som du ellers angiver i source herover
osmviborg (2018-01-06 14:51:55+00:00): https://www.kolding.dk/nyheder-aktuelt/nyheder-trafik-veje-og-parker/etablering-af-ny-rundkorsel-pa-koldingvej-sortebjergvej
highflyer74 (2017-11-18 09:41:40+00:00): Hello there! Please try to avoid self-intersecting ways and landuse like e.g. forest running through buildings etc. I fixed some of these issues in this area. Also, when dealing with multipolygons, I can really recommend to use the editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Nl%3AWikiStart) as it is much more comfortable and powerful and is also protecting the user to a certain degree to avoid uploading geometry or tagging mistakes. If you have any questions don't hesitate to write!
Dwaalgast (2017-11-20 11:21:48+00:00): Thank you for your attention. The initial filling of this area  is sometimes rather imprecise and has quite a lot of overlaps. Due to the size of the modifications, I have not always been able to remove all errors.
highflyer74 (2017-11-20 17:07:10+00:00): Hi again! Thanks for your feedback and happy mapping :-)
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jc86035 (2017-11-14 11:32:21+00:00): Hi, please be a bit careful with adding pathways. Some of the ones you added were already tagged as sidewalks to the adjacent roads, and some of them don't actually exist.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-11-13 17:03:03+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say that I think you have your premises POI in the wrong place, that is judging from your website.
If you need help re positioning it please just ask.
Regards Bernard
eggie (2017-11-13 14:20:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-13 14:23:08+00:00): office=company toegevoegd op adresnode
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
GerdP (2017-11-14 08:08:22+00:00): Moin!
Bitte verwende highway=crossing nur für den Node, den Fußweg und (Haupt-)Straße gemeinsam haben. Der Fußweg selbst wird wie immer mit highway=footway und zusätzlich mit footway=crossing erfaßt.
Im Falle von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540196303 läuft der Weg auch noch ohne Verbindung über einen Fußweg, vielleicht ist es eine Brücke? 
Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing
ToniE (2017-11-13 12:15:42+00:00): Hallo Railair,

die Zwischengeschosse als Fläche haben wir in München alle als highway=corridor, corridor=inddor, ... und nicht als footways gemapped. Sie sind Teil eines Gebäudes, der U-Bahnstation und nicht als Verkehrsfläche zu sehen.
Die Wege durch das Zwischengeschoss sind ja bereits als highway=footway gemapped, ohne area=yes.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
RailAir (2017-11-13 13:38:46+00:00): Hallo Toni,
der JOSM-validator meckerte genau die vorhandene Lösung an. Ob corridor oder footway ist wohl eher eine Geschmacksfrage aber layer=-1 wichtig. Übrigens bestand das Merkmal area=yes bereits.
Viele Grüße, Bernd
ToniE (2017-11-13 16:01:40+00:00): Hall Bernd,

ja, stimmt: Geschmacksfrage. Früher war highway=pedestrian dran. Eine (klassische) Fußgängerzone ists wohl aber auch nicht so recht.

Ich habe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
gefunden: ohne tunnel und ohne highway :-)

Wenn man tunnel=yes weg läßt, und kein highway=wasauchimmer hat meckert JOSM validator auch nicht mehr.
Es gibt viele Wege nach Rom.

Viele Grüße
Toni
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-11-21 14:49:28+00:00): Hi Piotr,
could you check the tagging of these objects? You used tags like "Lote 	= Lote  vago residencial', which can not be used for OSM. It might be a good description, but no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki can be used. 

Enjoy mapping!
Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Christopher (2017-11-15 20:39:44+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast bei Wietsock den Verlauf des Radwegs gleichmäßig an die Straße angepasst, wie man an den GPS-Spuren als auch bei Bing eindeutig sieht, dass der Radweg ein ganzes Stück von der Straße weg geht habe ich das da ich sowieso gerade Ergänzungen vorgenommen habe, habe ich entsprechend deine Änderung teilweise wieder zurück genommen.
Christopher
rrissiek (2017-11-16 09:40:51+00:00): Hallo,
Luftbilder können natürlich sehr hilfreich sein. Als ich den Weg aber letzten Sonntag entlang gewandert bin habe ich deutlich sehen können, das der Radweg nicht durch die Wiese führt. Vielleicht solltest Du dir die Situation mal direkt anschauen?
MvG
rrissiek
Christopher (2017-11-16 17:02:18+00:00): Hallo,
Ich kenne die Situation vor Ort sehr genau, die GPS-Spuren wenn man sie sich einblendet, sind wahrscheinlich zu 90% von mir. Ich habe den Weg jetzt auch darauf gemittelt, kann sein dass es vorher noch weiter auf der Wiese war.
Hier sieht man sehr genau, dass der Weg nicht parallel zur Straße verläuft: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/J0NTURxmy4kbNCtcjVb17Q
Mit der Wiese muss ich dir recht geben. Wie ebenfalls auf dem Foto zu sehen, ist der Weg zwischen dem Bäumen und der Wiese. Man müsste die Grenze der Wiese ggf. weiter nach Südost verschieben. Soweit es geht lass ich die landuse=* Flächen weitestgehend unberührt. Die Entscheidung, ob die Fläche zw. Radweg und Straße auch als Wiese oder Wald definiert wird, ist halt nicht so einfach zu entscheiden. 
Christopher
mueschel (2017-11-14 09:38:39+00:00): Hi,
you added 95 objects with the tag 'bottom width'. I guess this should be 'bottom_width', even though this tag is not documented at all.
Please fix this

Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 21:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
RicoElectrico (2018-05-13 09:48:40+00:00): Cześć. Według Państwowego Rejestru Nazw Geograficznych nazwa to Przeryj. Być może funkcjonują dwie - możesz powiedzieć coś o źródle nazwy dodanej przez Ciebie?
Sylwester Bańcyrowski (2018-05-14 09:24:03+00:00): Cześć, przyznaję, że do żadnych rejestrów nie zaglądałem.
Natomiast od dziecka bywam w tych okolicach i cała społeczność nazywa to jeziorko "Przeria".
Chyba nawet tabliczka tam jest z tą nazwą.

Google pokazuje wyniki zarówno dla
"Biedrzychów :Przeria"
jak i 
"Biedrzychów Przeryj"

Ja z tą drugą nazwą pierwszy raz spotkałem się w życiu tutaj.
Sylwester Bańcyrowski (2018-05-14 09:26:55+00:00): btw. na Google Maps jest "Przeria":
https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.8981494,21.8031581,17z
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-13 14:56:53+00:00): Hint... tracktype grade5 is an extra tag connected with the tag highway=track.
A path does'nt need an extra tag tracktype= ... because this is not a track.
You will change it?
please reply...
Murdock7762 (2017-11-13 15:48:10+00:00): i just extended the existing paths. so tag must have been there before. i will remove the tags track type =
eggie (2017-11-13 16:05:56+00:00): Great... thanks for your reply.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-11-13 18:27:41+00:00): Jeg har løsnet addresserne fra bygningen, da den ellers vil blive trukket skæv, når addresserne bliver flyttet tilbage til de placeringer de har i den officielle database.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ToniE (2017-11-13 13:21:04+00:00): Hallo RailAir,

ist der Name des Ladens wirklich "Nagestudio"?
Ich weiss, es war ein anderer Mapper, aber evtl. weißt Du es ja.
"name=Nagelstudio" sollte durch shop=beauty ersetzt werden.
Wenn der richtige und offizielle Name nicht bekannt ist bleibt name= leer.

Beachte: name=xxx - xxx ist der offizielle Name. "name" = "wie es heißt" aber nicht "was es ist".

Anderes Beipiel: name=Waschnanlage --> amenity=car_wash und name= bleibt leer oder name=Aral.

Siehe auch 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Viele Grüße
Toni
RailAir (2017-11-13 13:48:29+00:00): Hallo Toni,
das hieß schon immer Nagelstudio. Aber lassen wir das. Das ist wohl nicht bedeutend? Ob der Laden dort noch exisiert wird die Schwarmintelligenz von OSM zeigen.
Frohes Mappen! Bernd
ToniE (2017-11-13 15:56:28+00:00): Danke,

ich habe name= gelöscht und shop=beauty getagged.

KeepRight und OSM Inspector werden dann bald meckern, dass name= fehlt.

Viele Grüße
Toni
Self-Perfection (2019-08-04 21:09:12+00:00): Интересно, откуда взялась эта точка - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5226427031 , о чём она вообще. Как мне показалось на местности, всё здание занято СМ клиникой ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6535852225 )
literan (2019-08-04 21:21:57+00:00): от этого товарища https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53731447#map=7/53.490/38.670 - я просто перенес на точку с здания. Смело удаляйте, если что
muralito (2017-11-14 13:00:49+00:00): Valentina, por cada elemento de la realidad se mapea un unico elemento en OpenStreetMap. En este caso, eso lleva a mapear el edificio, pero no el amenity=fuel que ya estaba mapeado, porque queda duplicado.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ma-rt-in (2017-11-14 08:43:16+00:00): Hallo,
über denke bitte noch mal deine Änderung am Way 540190104. Am besten schaust du mal in den Wiki Artikel zu access.
Vietwoojagig (2017-11-14 08:51:24+00:00): Wenn du der Meinung bist das da was falsch ist, dann bitte ändere es. 
Das ist ein Weg den man hinter der Kirche ohne Beschränkung gehen kann, aber er gehört zum Komplex Kirche-Burg also semi-öffentlich.
ma-rt-in (2017-11-14 08:56:52+00:00): Ich möchte ja das du bzw. der Bearbeiter ja auch was lernt. Dann wäre access=permessive genau das richtige, statt noch einzelne Werte extra zu sperren. Denn hw=footway sperrt sowieso motor_vehicle.
Vietwoojagig (2017-11-14 09:01:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Aber dann wäre es einfacher gewesen direkt zu sagen was falsch war und wie man es es besser machen kann. Ein Hinweis auf einen Wiki-Artikel mit Link hätte auch geholfen. Ich bin kein permanenter Editor und mache Sachen nur wenn ich bei mir bekannten Orten fehlende oder falsche Dinge bemerke. Dann mach ich die Dinge aber auch kurz und schmerzlos.
ma-rt-in (2017-11-14 09:02:31+00:00): ok. *daumen hoch*
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ACS1986 (2017-11-13 22:38:24+00:00): Hi Peter,
Gosh you were oon the ball with mapping the opening of this link road!
The section of Lune St alongside the corn exchange up to the path to Friargate is part of the National Cycle Network. The oneway restriction appears to make it unusable by cyclists travelling north-south. Did you notice whether there is an exemption to the oneway restriction for cycles or alternatively a cycleway alongside the new link road? Not that it is entirely beyond imagination that LCC would neglect to consider cycle routing when building a new road link...
Kind regards,
Adam
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:59:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
letihu (2017-11-20 08:41:46+00:00): Steht dieses Tor
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5226492562/history
wirklich ohne Zaun auf dem Weg?
Hier hastest du noch 2 Tore eingetragen, Eins hab ich schon mal gelöscht.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SOSM (2017-11-16 20:12:51+00:00): Hallo
Was für ein Objekt sollte hier wirklich eingetragen werden?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-11-13 17:02:21+00:00): Part of this changeset is reverted (reason: reclassifying roads to a classification which does not fit reality)
majid1359 (2017-11-13 14:15:38+00:00): تغییرات انجام شد
eggie (2017-11-13 14:59:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-13 15:03:11+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park: De functie park ligt helemaal los over de landuse en water heen.
Graag reactie..
eggie (2017-11-13 15:03:32+00:00): voorbeeld park
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
eggie (2017-11-13 15:05:58+00:00): Het gaat juist om de landuse te bewaren en zaken toe te voegen als natural=tree.
Ik pas even wat aan. Ook zit het park geplakt aan een kruispunt van wegen. Dit was je edit.
eggie (2017-11-13 15:18:17+00:00): landuse 3dshapes hersteld... Leisure park met naam er los overheen gelegd. natural=tree toegevoegd als voorbeeld om het af te maken.
eggie (2017-11-13 15:18:57+00:00): park losgemaakt van kruispunt bij bushaltes