piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
micheleOSM3 (2021-02-07 22:25:36+00:00): Ok, l'unico dubbio che ho è questo: Prendo per buona l'informazione del CAI che fa partire il sentiero un po' più in alto? Se sì, anche il sentiero denominato "Via Normale Jôf Fuart" verrà fatto partire un po' più in alto e quindi se ci sono libri guide o quant'altro che descrivono la "Via Normale Jôf Fuart", indipendentemente dal sentiero CAI, troverebbero una incoerenza con le mappe OSM.
gpstracks (2021-02-07 22:37:19+00:00): Ciao.
Secondo me, sempre meglio che avere due relazioni dello stesso itinerario che genererebbero solo confusione.
micheleOSM3 (2021-02-08 08:31:31+00:00): Ok corretto, ho cancellato la mia nuova relazione e aggiornato la vecchia relazione con le nuove informazioni. Per non perdere informazioni ho anche creato una relazione per la prima parte storica del sentiero "Via Normale Jôf Fuart", ma se la ritieni inutile la cancello.
praise_you (2021-08-28 11:05:25+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du auf Bauparzellen ohne Bebauung die Adressknoten gesetzt hast. Es betrifft die Finkenstraße 8, 10, 14 und 18. Ist das schon richtig? Es ist ja kein Gebäude und keine Bewohner hier. Gilt hier nicht das was on-the-ground zu finden ist?
gzin (2021-08-28 19:58:45+00:00): Hallo praise_you!
Bei einer durchgehenden aufsteigenden Bebauung/Benennung der Häuser einer Straße lässt sich auf die Lücken zwischen 2 Häusern doch recht leicht schließen. Zwischen 12 und 16 wird wohl 14 liegen, oder?
Beim Verkauf einer Parzelle ist das Grundstück mit der zugehörigen Nummer dann auch leichter aufzufinden. Am Luftbild sind die Parzellen auch klar erkennbar, besonders bei 14 und 18.

P.S.: Magst du die Konturen des inzwischen auf den Luftbildern recht gut erkennbaren Hauses 16 anpassen (bei deinem Letztstand von 2011 dürften die Luftbilder die Details noch nicht gezeigt haben)?

P.P.S.: Welche Basis hast du für die Konturen bei "Vogeltenn 5" am 2.8.2012 verwendet? Mit "basemap.at Orthofoto" stimmt das nicht besonders überein. Ist das deine "Home-Zone"?

BG Günther
praise_you (2021-08-28 20:31:15+00:00): Hallo Günther,
Die Nummerierung kann man leicht erkennen, aber das kann eigentlich jeder. Darum sollte eher das eingezeichnet werden was vorhanden ist. Ich weiß nicht ob es ein berechtigter Use-Case ist, aber ich verwende die Anzahl der Häuser für eine Auswertung im Rahmen der Feuerwehr. Können wir diese Knoten entfernen?
Das Haus 16 habe ich nur als Baustelle gesehen und dann ungefähr eingezeichnet, weil vorher noch kein Luftbild verfügbar war. 
Wenn man geoimage als Hintergrund nimmt, bietet dieser eine Aufnahme von diesem Jahr. Das Haus wurde ausgebaut und aufgestockt. Basemap ist momentan Altstand.
Ja, ich bin aus Bad Wimsbach und schaue, dass die Daten passen, jedoch bin ich momentan mit dem Datenstand zufrieden und mache nur mehr Aktualisierungen.
BG Alois
Negjana (2021-02-27 14:47:57+00:00): Gibts für die eingezeichneten Verläufe irgendeine Quellen?

Das schaut sehr nach Kaffeesudleserei aus.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
maraf24 (2021-02-08 12:28:45+00:00): Przykłady nieistniejących budynków:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904830724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904831232
Cristoffs (2021-02-08 23:00:55+00:00): Nie weryfikuje danych i nie sprawdza przed wysłaniem na serwer. Pustych budynków nie unikniesz i tak, ale tu nie ma pobieżnego sprawdzenia nawet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98865414
topius (2021-02-08 10:05:26+00:00): Hi gibranhalil, 

With airports, please make sure that you use the correct IATA and ICAO codes (these two are always different, never the same). Many you can access on the ourairports.com website. Also, OSM uses meters, not feet.

Best wishes, 

Topius
BCNorwich (2021-02-08 09:19:37+00:00): Retagged Way: 98001921 as part service part track, it's not all footway.
Gordo4444 (2021-02-09 17:01:46+00:00): Many thanks Bernard. I wasn't sure if the route, as a Public Footpath along its full length from Church Road to the High Road should be labeled as a footway or not. Best regards Gordon
BCNorwich (2021-02-09 17:36:10+00:00): Hello Gordon, I didn't realise it was a public footpath. In this case the tags designation=public_footpath and foot=designated show the Public Right of Way status. I've sectioned the ways and added those tags.

Regards Bernard.
Gordo4444 (2021-02-09 18:58:17+00:00): Many thanks Bernard, I'll use this guidance for future updates. Best regards Gordon
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-08 12:23:12+00:00): Od  20:51:14 do 21:01:18 wykonałeś poniższe edycje.

Przy imporcie z tego źródła trzeba dane przeglądać czego nie zrobiłeś.

Proszę, przeczytaj ponownie https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4661
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865610

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865498

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865489

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865486

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865480

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865475

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865471

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865467

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865462

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865414

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865374

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98865366
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-08 12:25:16+00:00): You added about 12 000 building within 10 minutes (and 4 seconds).

And that is after a block for importing from source requiring review without review.

Please, stop immediately any imports at all.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-08 12:29:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pa%C5%84stwowy_Rejestr_Granic - importowanie jest OK - ale wtedy i tylko wtedy gdy przegląda się co się dodaje

Gdyby wkopiowanie wszystkiego na ślepo było dobrym planem to byłoby to dawno zrobione.
Cristoffs (2021-02-08 22:41:23+00:00): Proszę zaprzestań tego działania. Na dokonywanie tego typu zmian są odpowiednie standardy, których nie przestrzegasz kolejny raz.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98865610
Futur3r (2021-02-07 22:37:08+00:00): Salut,
fait attention à ne pas attacher une voie avec des parkings ou landuse=*.

J'ai fait la correction.

Merci pour ta contribution :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98865776
Dino Michelini (2021-02-10 11:34:49+00:00): Anche qui nel from andrebbe posto "Via Francigena". Nel maintenance cercherei di uniformare il testo di modo perchè il percorsi sono da segnalare. Se il percorso ancora non è segnalato i tag symbol andrebbero cambiati in symbol=nome, symbol:it=non segnalato
eggie (2021-02-08 18:50:57+00:00): Dag ABM,

Wanneer er meer rijstroken zijn en je kunt fysiek naar de andere rijstrook oversteken (ook al zou dat niet mogen)  worden geen aparten rijbanen gemapt.
De voorgaande mapper A67-A67 had het hier juist keurig gemapt.
Dit kan beter teruggedraaid worden.

Zie ook draadje op forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818228#p818228

Je zou even kunnen aanhaken.
MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-08 18:45:14+00:00): Beste ABM.. Waarom de buildingtag verwijderd en de adresnode verplaatst?
Je edits zijn door een medemapper hersteld.
Je edits..
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98866494

MVG
eggie
The_ABM (2021-02-09 08:16:22+00:00): hallo eggie,
 ik heriner me niet het verwijderen van noden. ik heb we 2 punten opn de omtrek van het gebouw die te dicht bij elkaar waren samen toegevoed.

met betrekking to het kruispunt. dacht ik dat het beter kon.

dank voor je bericht en het herstellen.
excuus voor het ongemaak.

groet,

The_ABM
eggie (2021-02-09 08:31:59+00:00): Dag The ABM   
Net nog even wat aangepast.
De overkapping steekt net over het kantoortje heen. building=roof en layer=1 dus. Het zit niet aan elkaar. 
Het herstel was overigens gedaan door een medemapper.
Een node verschuiven gebeurt om de haverklap met editor iD. Dat komt omdat je schuift en selecteert met de linker muisknop. Dat geeft al snel problemen. Je schuift en net per abuis iets geselecteerd.
Iets om in de gaten te houden.
Bij JOSM schuif je met rechts en selecteer je met links. Dan heb je dat probleem niet.
Kijk eens naar  
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710 
Een aanrader!       
Tja en die kruispunten. Er wordt steeds meer met lanes gewerkt en voorsorteerstroken. Dat allemaal op één way. Dus lanes=4  En dan een hele riedel hoe de stroken liggen. 
Wanneer je dat zonder veel ervaring gaat veranderen werkt het meestal niet meer goed. 
De routingapps maken daar daadwerkelijk gebruik van. Het is bijna specialistenwerk geworden.

Je bedoeling was uiteraard goed. 


Mapse en bedankt voor je reactie
Eggie
Allison P (2021-02-07 23:04:13+00:00): It looks like the street name is in all caps. I doubt that's the case in reality.
VLLLVI (2021-12-28 21:05:04+00:00): Ciao fedc, posso chiederti perche hai mappato vari tracciati di Tram non piu presenti? Non sono piu presenti e quindi verificabili. Non sarebbe meglio inserirli in OpenHistoricalMap
fedc (2022-01-04 10:38:03+00:00): Ciao,
credevo che andassero mappati. Da quando mi hanno detto di evitare non ne ho più inseriti.
VLLLVI (2022-01-04 13:06:18+00:00): Pensi che potresti rimuoverli? Magari potresti riportarli in OpenHistoricalMap cosi non vanno persi. https://openhistoricalmap.org/
fedc (2022-01-04 13:22:26+00:00): No, non li rimuovo perché il disegno è costato parecchio tempo.
Ovviamente se la comunità degli utenti decide che vanno rimossi, non mi opporrò.
Non conosco openhistoricalmap e quindi non so come spostarli...
skyper (2021-03-27 17:24:22+00:00): Das Ändern von FIXME zu fixme ohne etwas zu verändern ist nicht gerade nett. FIXME ist nicht falsch und im Wiki erwähnt. Das iD da eine andere Meinung hat, ist nicht mein Problem.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/611621906/history
CNelke (2021-03-27 18:26:07+00:00): Geht es dir um den tag oder habe ich deiner Meinung nach was anderes falsch erfasst?

Gruß
 Christian
skyper (2021-03-28 13:25:55+00:00): Mir geht es um den Schlüssel und das Erhöhen der Versionsnummer bzw. Anfassen des Objekt ohne Verbesserung. Es bringt nichts den Schlüssel zu verändern, da es zu Inkonsistenzen zu der Umgebung führt und in dieser Gegend alle "FIXME" definitiv manuell eingetragen wurden was ich von "fixme" nicht behaupten kann.

Als iD-benutzende Person würde ich mich bei den entwickelden Personen beschweren, da hier mehr Probleme verursacht werden als Daten verbessert.

Viele Grüße
skyper
CNelke (2021-03-28 20:51:00+00:00): OK. Interessanter Ansatz.

Grüße
 Christian
skyper (2021-03-29 10:07:37+00:00): FIXME hebt sich auch besser ab und in JOSM werden Großbuchstaben komplett vor Kleinbuchstaben sortiert, somit ist FIXME immer der erste Tag in der Liste der Tagliste (ausser es gibt einen mit Sonderzeichen oder A-E am Anfang. Ähnliches gilt auch für ToDo bzw. TODO.

Ciao skyper
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-09 22:59:58+00:00): Looks good, it looks like you have all of the important information tagged on the house.
Is it really that shape though?
If it's actually rectangular then you can right click and square the corners.
Also if you know the area it would be great to add addresses nearby too. Either tagged on the buildings or as new points.
DUGA (2021-09-11 17:44:47+00:00): Please ensure to enable relevant layer while mapping. You added a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61339194 as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904857590.

Moreover, avoid using dated sources to map Maryland.
ivanbranco (2021-02-08 10:51:11+00:00): Ciao Stefano,

hai inserito sei nuovi tag in questo changeset, cosa rappresentano?
Inoltre se fosse possibile aggiungere un commento ai tuoi changeset per aiutare gli altri a capire cosa hai modificato, grazie
Stefanodelfarfa (2021-02-08 13:20:10+00:00): Ciao Ivan, era una dimenticanza ho appena provveduto.
Aggiungerò  i commenti d'ora in poi,
grazie per la segnalazione
ovruni (2021-02-08 00:21:54+00:00): Hola, he notado que mapeaste en la zona de Santa Teresita, actualmente esta zona esta siendo mapeada como parte de un proyecto en OSM, los detalles de este proyecto los puedes encontrar en la wiki [0]. Ahí se indica sobre utilizar el hashtag #UNMSMxFECONAU y el uso de las imágenes aéreas de Maxar, lo cual se puede hacer mediante la opción "Configuración de fondo" (botón al lado derecho) -> "Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)". Si tienes alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mapeo_de_los_caser%C3%ADos_pertenecientes_a_la_Federaci%C3%B3n_de_comunidades_nativas_del_Ucayali_y_afluentes_FECONAU .
mueschel (2021-02-10 14:37:18+00:00): Hi,
what does installation=free and setup=free mean? These tags are not used in any other place.
Amir azimpour (2021-02-10 17:33:33+00:00): You pay just tire price and if you want install it on your car , this service will be free 
other tire store just sell tire and you have to go tire service place and install your new tires , this service cost about 1,500,000 - 2,000,000 Rials but in this store that will be free
eggie (2021-02-08 07:17:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Tip
foot=yes hoef je niet toe te voegen net als oneway=no .. Dat is allemaal default.
Gebouwen en adresnodes kun je laten importeren via het forum van OSM. 
Het gebouw op de constructieplaats ontbreekt nog.
Een aanvraag doe je in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-08 07:35:02+00:00): Importverzoek loopt https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818169#p818169
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:06:54+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#17.11/12.31182/55.96790/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:10:38+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.30852/55.96558/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:17:12+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:17:28+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:17:35+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:14:50+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.29978/55.99871/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:17:41+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:17:54+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:16:58+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.94/12.30585/55.99074/hot/ride
DaveF (2021-02-08 06:13:39+00:00): All national Rail stations have the three letter code using ref:crs. Please don't duplicate
Mauls (2021-02-08 13:14:08+00:00): railway:ref is the used internationally for station reference codes by OpenRailwayMap - ref:crs is a UK-specific tagging. What is the issue with having duplicate tagging?
DaveF (2021-02-08 15:46:03+00:00): Hi
Duplication leads to confusion & errors. railway:ref isn't specific, it's not clear. 
Before I co-ordinated UK stations there was a half-arsed incoherent mess. All stations are now consistently labelled. If ORM want to make use of them they can write the code to suit. The 'rail enthusiasts' who designed the tagging scheme went for extraordinary detail but forgot about clarity. Refs for stations are a combination of namespace & underscore, 'ref' at the beginning, 'ref' at the ends. No coordination.
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/660667810
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:12:47+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.30852/55.96558/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:12:57+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.30852/55.96558/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:09:20+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#17.11/12.31182/55.96790/hot/ride
Fra00 (2021-02-08 18:01:17+00:00): Salve,
potrei chiederle di fare più attenzione alle reali fattezze degli edifici quando li traccia in mappa?
L'edificio non ha la forma e la posizione del tetto, che possono apparire distorte a causa dell'immagine satellitare, ma quella della sua base. Lei ha tracciato case a base rettangolare di forme spigolose solamente perché il tetto appariva distorto, causando quindi incorrettezze nella mappa.
Grazie, buon proseguimento
Giugent93 (2021-02-09 10:38:37+00:00): Mi dispiace ma generalmente seguo sempre le linee che l'immagine satellitare mi suggerisce, e lo faccio con precisione. Ovviamente ci possono essere casi in cui la realtà discorda con l'immagine che uno utilizza come riferimento. Spero di notare la prossima volta queste "distorsioni" di cui le parla. Buon proseguimento
Fra00 (2021-02-09 11:12:52+00:00): L'immagine satellitare che utilizza è giusta. Tuttavia tracciare con precisione un edificio non vuol dire ricopiare la sagoma del tetto, ma quella della base, che in questa zona particolare non coincidono a causa di questa distorsione dell'immagine.
Giugent93 (2021-02-09 11:24:25+00:00): Capito, certo, bisogna tenere in considerazione la base. Comunque sia io sto utilizzando come sfondo la Esri World Beta, vedo che alcuni edifici anche fatti da lei non seguono le linee del mio sfondo. Probabilmente lei sta usando un'altra immagine satellitare per mappare.
Fra00 (2021-02-09 14:41:21+00:00): Stiamo usando la stessa immagine. I miei edifici rispecchiamo la realtà, in quanto basta ingrandire un minimo per vedere come i bordi coincidano con le basi degli edifici. I suoi rispecchiano invece i tetti, molto spesso sbagliando. In alcuni casi è palese: ha tracciato edifici all'interno del settore stradale, o alcuni li fa intersecare tra loro.
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:19:00+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.31223/55.96020/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:19:25+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.31223/55.96020/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:19:29+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap: 
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.81/12.31223/55.96020/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:21:17+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.54/12.36504/56.03217/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:21:51+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.54/12.36504/56.03217/hot/ride
Larvikite (2021-02-12 18:21:55+00:00): I have biked this path multiple times and the path is also clearly documented on Strava's Global Heatmap:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.54/12.36504/56.03217/hot/ride
Alan Bragg (2021-04-18 16:15:44+00:00): Neat way to adapt "ball" golf to "disc".
I added the name "The Lyons Den Disc Golf Course"
Trail_Caretaker (2021-04-18 17:35:17+00:00): Hi Alan, thanks, I am not sure what you mean though.  I am not a golfer of either but thought I could put this on the map and maybe bring some clarity for someone.  I am assuming that they might still use tee box, fairway, or putting green but have no idea.Maybe that is what you meant?  You can also reach me at originalgravity@hotmail.com.  I had a bit of a struggle finding where your message was on here to be able to reply to it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ovruni (2021-02-08 04:19:50+00:00): He notado que en esta edición se ha agregado etiqueta building=yes en áreas completas que no son edificaciones. La etiqueta con clave building [0] esta destinada a edificaciones individuales, un lugar puede tener ninguna, una o mas de una edificación y también otras secciones no construidas, como se da en algunos hospitales, colegios, etc. Por lo tanto la etiqueta sería solo para las edificaciones, mas no el área completa. Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
andi9876 (2021-02-09 00:32:32+00:00): no nursing_home here.
deleted. 
please stop add nursing_homes