piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Futur3r (2021-08-16 10:35:52+00:00): C'est sûr c'est un peu triste que la voie de contournement soit pas utilisé plus que sa, mais la zone d'activité à l'est et le centre amènent beaucoup de trafic.

Et en heure de pointe tout ces axes sont bouchés.
Puis au delà du trafic, c'est des routes qui sont assez dangereuses, les gens roulent vite.

J'avais fait cette modif mais j'ai décidé de rester sur les données de Route 500 après avoir utiliser ces routes en vélotaf.

Après bon, peut être que ce sera probablement en secondaire sur Route 500 quand ce sera à jour mais au moins la Route d'Annecy du centre de Pringy doit être en secondaire pas en tertiaire.
Futur3r (2021-08-16 09:57:39+00:00): Salut,

c'est des escaliers et pas des rampes !

Merci :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109735009
alkino (2021-08-16 10:09:40+00:00): Hum, il y a des marches d'ânes et des escaliers, je voulais justement ajouter une note pour que quelqu'un de proche aille faire un meilleur repérage.
Futur3r (2021-08-16 10:21:22+00:00): Sa compte comme un escalier.

Mais si tu n'est pas sur des données le cartographie pas.

Merci pour le passage, je pensais que depuis le temps ils étaient tous là mais faut croire que nan :D
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 08:29:14+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
GuyToronto (2021-08-16 13:06:15+00:00): Don't commit large area changesets like this. Limit your changesets to smaller regional areas.
TrevorAlan (2021-08-18 00:46:28+00:00): Dude, what are you editing? Chinese something payment, but also edits in the US that make it cover a HUGE part of the map.. stop please.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-18 03:51:15+00:00): @TrevorAlan To be fair, UnionPay is available worldwide.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-25 02:47:56+00:00): If you have trouble, why not go to ask wheelmap.org not do this? This website do global mapping day and day and day. If you see "history" it will give you a lot of global changesets from this website, it will bother you more than my seldom changes.
It is because I'm Chinese, so you become angry and go there to shut me "not do that"!
TrevorAlan (2021-08-25 03:11:47+00:00): We are asking YOU to not make the edits since YOU made them. And your race has nothing to do with it...
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-25 03:51:08+00:00): The things you ask is about GLOBAL EDIT, that is what you first ask me for.
You only comment on my changesets, other mapper's global edits are not be hot pursued.
For the original question GLOBAL EDIT, you are accusing baselessly becaues guide in OSM don't say you should ban a global edit, here!(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ)

(Reply for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109747676 are all in there)
user_11435438 (2021-08-25 04:02:12+00:00): Hey, TrevorAlan, are you thinking 快乐的老鼠宝宝 is doing wrong mapping, but do you think about the original reason of global editing?
If data have no problem, other mapper will not have to find and make changes to make up. This bbox have ralated to america is because america have very sloppy data exist.
And I have to say, his (or her) edit is correct. In fact, the former is the irregular writing of the latter. There is only one unionpay.
ALu68 (2021-08-18 07:14:43+00:00): Hello Mythili Sunil Kumar,

Welcome to OSM.

The hashtag is not a name!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972494868/history

Before proceeding with the mapping, please read the wiki first!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

See wiki for name:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
See wiki for building: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Regards. Andre
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-16 08:29:45+00:00): If you have more idea about this edit, please COMMENT to me first, NOT to revert immediately!
Futur3r (2021-08-16 09:50:21+00:00): Salut,

pourquoi avoir joint la route à la limite communale ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109735481
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-08-16 10:11:20+00:00): La route change de nom en changeant de commune.
Futur3r (2021-08-16 10:23:48+00:00): Certes, mais pourquoi tu as attaché les deux objets alors qu'ils n'ont rien à voir.

Sa m'arrive trop souvent de mettre à jour la voirie et de modifier tout les landuses et communes du coin parce que ces types d'objets sont joins.
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-08-16 13:35:06+00:00): ah d'accord, je vois ce que tu veux dire, et bien c'est une habitude personnelle...
Futur3r (2021-08-16 16:11:22+00:00): Ok, tu peux corriger, j'ai essayé mais tu as même sectionné la boundary et j'ai pas trop envie de toucher à ce type de relations.

Merci :)
Frans S (2021-08-16 14:26:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. Please map buildings individually, don't combine multiple buildings to 1 mapping. 
Most buildings are rather rectangular ( sometimes partly hiddend by trees) so extrapolate the hidden parts. Also square each rectangular building after mapping with the Q key.
Bestregards and keep mapping
eggie (2021-08-16 09:53:37+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode 
 

MVG
eggie
user_11435438 (2021-08-31 08:43:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 110499661, restored place node 8284103715.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109735702
Frans S (2021-08-16 12:46:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
You overlooked several buildings.
Please check your task on missing buildings before stop mapping
Best regards
arvdk (2021-08-17 08:06:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution, but you changed heigth to heigtht. Could you change it to 'height'? I assume that was your intention anyway :) Thank you.
Ana Luisa (2021-08-17 13:20:14+00:00): Thanks. You were right or should i say "rigtht" ;)
Sanniu (2021-11-10 08:42:24+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973469216, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973469218#map=19/32.55052/35.35507, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973469217 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973469178 are untagged. Can you, please, tag them?
Denis_Helfer (2021-08-17 07:50:16+00:00): Bonjour Eric,

personnellement, je n'utiliserai pas rail=construction puisqu'il ne s'agit pas d'une ligne nouvelle mais de la réouverture d'une ligne existante.
De même préférer detail=track à tracks=1
Eric S (2021-08-17 15:01:08+00:00): J'ai juste homogénéisé ce qui était déjà partiellement mis sur la ligne (et le validateur de JOSM s'est effectivement plaint entre railway=construction, construction=rail et construction:railway=yes. S'il y a une proposition de tag pour les lignes fermées de nombreux mois pour travaux, je veux bien l'appliquer.

Pour le tracks=1, je n'y ai pas touché. C'était là avant.
Denis_Helfer (2021-08-17 15:06:33+00:00): la ligne devait être (aurait dû être) en statut neutralisé (railway=disused + disused:railway=rail).
Pour le tracks=1, un jour je sortirai le tromblon.
chlenix (2021-08-16 09:46:08+00:00): а зачем Вы удалили теги?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109736938
chlenix (2021-08-16 09:45:32+00:00): просьба называть здания согласно вики. абревиатуры не надо писать в название
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109737034
Ján Neščivera (2021-08-18 12:01:43+00:00): Ahoj, vidim ze si pridal ladovnu vo Vlachove, no nerozumiem preco je to oznacene ako place of worship - to predsa nie je kostol ani nic podobne, je to vzasade chladnicka pred existenciou elektriny
majec25 (2021-08-18 14:17:07+00:00): Ďakujem za opravu.
x58 (2021-08-18 07:16:46+00:00): This road is a highway:track according to all the conditions outlined in the wiki for track. I know this because I surveyed it as indicated in changeset/109605800 where I marked it as such.

Please review your process at Apple that causes you to destroy local knowlegeg and survey data. Someone from pple made the same error here changeset/109846534
DnieperBeck (2021-08-19 20:03:11+00:00): Thanks for contacting me. My colleague gave a detailed response on a similar scenario here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109846534
Frans S (2021-08-16 15:14:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A request. Please be more accurate in your mappings, by following the outlines of a building and square each rectangular building each building with the Q key.
Hest regards
Denis_Helfer (2021-08-17 07:45:28+00:00): Bonjour Eric,

Pour l'utilisation de la clé ref:FR:SNCF_Reseau (et des clés associées) voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:SNCF_Reseau
Eric S (2021-08-17 14:53:33+00:00): Heu... j'ai surtout homogénéisé la ligne (toute l'étoile de Saint-Pol en fait). Là, quand je vois le wiki sur FR:SNCF_Reseau, je prends peur et je crains que ça ne dépasse mon niveau de compétence. Je te laisse compléter...
Denis_Helfer (2021-08-17 14:59:39+00:00): Pas de souci, j'inscris cela sur ma todo.
En fait, il manque (pour le moment) une page projet pour attirer des contributeurs. Ce n'est pas si difficile que cela après tout.
eggie (2021-08-16 09:58:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Je hebt de Landarbeid vanaf de Huenderweg veranderd in een highway=path. Dat lijkt me niet correct. Wanneer een weg geschikt is voor bv een landbouwvoertuig is het een highway=track  

Is dit werkelijk een paadje geworden?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
elastiek (2021-08-16 10:12:43+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dankjewel voor je feedback. Dit is inderdaad een pad voor landbouwvoertuigen. Ik pas het aan!

Vr.gr. Edwin
eggie (2021-08-16 10:16:21+00:00): Oke Edwin... In het begin lijkt OSM wat op rijstebrij, maar er zit toch een bepaalde logica achter.
Veel plezier met mappen. 
eggie
yadathot (2021-08-16 09:32:56+00:00): Edited access tag as per Driver feedback.
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-08-16 12:18:49+00:00): Hello
Either do you trust at 100% the STP open data or have done a lot of suvey here in Brindisi?
Till before the COVID a lot of error (including a no more existing bus stop) were found in STP data
Jordan Mann (2021-08-16 12:49:17+00:00): Hello,

I can't say I 100% trust the data but based on the recency of the output (August 2021) I would say I'm 90%-95% sure of it's accuracy. I did also spend some time in Brindisi (and the wider area) and the general lack of public transport information was a real headache, I think adding more could be better in this instance.

The main reason I see for inputting this information is that it makes mapping bus routes far easier. Because there is a lack of bus route mapping in the region I think it's good to promote this. Incorrect bus stops aren't a huge issue as long as they aren't attached to routing in my opinion.

Interested to hear your thoughts on the matter though as you are clearly an expert in the region!

Thanks for reaching out,
Jordan
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-08-16 14:34:26+00:00): I've been living in Brindisi for 3 years. I've found several errors on their data, so I travelled by bus a lot.

Apulia is a big region, but with not so many expert mappers.
Outside Brindisi I map everything I can, but now IMHO is more important add the name to the highways inside the villages
Jordan Mann (2021-08-18 10:15:12+00:00): Sure and I definitely understand, generally we don't want incorrect data on the map.

In this instance though I think it would be worth adding too many stops rather than too little because it is painful to navigate this region via bus using OSM data currently. Having the stops ready to attach routes to would ease the effort of adding routes overall. In my opinion, a good thing.

Mapping this is something I am willing to (and able to) help with remotely, where I don't have access to road names for villages. Different mapping projects can also work in parallel.

If you strongly think adding bus stops is the wrong thing to do then I can stop, but after being there for a while I think this information is really needed.
skyper (2021-08-17 11:10:54+00:00): Hallo Waldemar5
Willkommen bei OSM.

Leider beschädigt iD beim Aufteilen von Linien häufig Route-Relationen in dem es die Mitglieder vertauscht.. In diesem Fall waren es drei von vier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13081704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13081695
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/171366

Habe es repariert, aber bitte sei vorsichtig mit iD und Route-Relationen oder verwende eine bessere Software.

Grüße skyper
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-21 09:28:10+00:00): Hey johanemilsson,

If you would like to map anything not specified in a HOT task, please do so outside of said task.
This makes it faster for mappers to map the task and easier for validators looking at changes.

Regards,

Daniel
johanemilsson (2021-08-27 07:27:13+00:00): Hi,
Sure, I'll make sure to do that in the future.
/Johan
SafetyIng (2021-08-16 19:32:11+00:00): Hey, könntest du in deinen Changeset-Kommentaren vielleicht etwas besser beschreiben, was du jeweils getan hast?
Aus "Nachträgliche Eintragungen" wird man leider ohne rein zu gucken nicht schlau.
Zum Beispiel wäre hier: "Fußwege hinzugefügt" passender.
tszym (2021-08-17 21:57:57+00:00): Hi Lugiadri1, it looks like you are wanting to map the turn lanes of the road by splitting a way for each lane.
If that's the case, please don't do this way. You are over complicating the intersection. Please have a look at the wiki about lanes and turn:lanes tags which are made for such elements.
Could you please reconsider your changes after that? I noticed you did similar changes to other intersections in the past few days. Please take a look at them too.
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109739101
mueschel (2021-08-22 17:05:05+00:00): Hi,
please give us some information about your edits. You added many different weight-related tags to roads.

- what is the source of this information? The source should be given in the changeset

- what are the actual traffic signs on each of these roads? According to your tags, there have to be at least 4 signs. about weight and weight rating and for hgv and for other traffic. This seems unrealistic.

- please use meaningful changeset comments, not just '1' - this is useless.
Raa39 (2021-08-22 17:41:59+00:00): Привет. 
-Информацию беру из нагитора ТРАКТ.
-Леплю все знаки подряд лиш бы на фуре не тащило в этом месте, потому что не всегда на один из них реагирует OsmAnd при построении маршрута.
-я потихоньку добавляю корректные коменнтарии к пакету правок
mueschel (2021-08-22 18:26:27+00:00): What is ТРАКТ? What is the license of this data? Is it compatible with the license requirements of OSM?

I could check a couple of these signs on other images. In all cases most of the tags you used are wrong. I couldn't find anything about maxweight or delivery on any of these images.
In some places I couldn't see any signs at all, and in one case there's even a sign allowing only trucks *above* 7.5t...
Raa39 (2021-08-22 20:14:10+00:00): Ты пользуешься грузовой навигацией?
Dodko (2021-08-18 14:08:09+00:00): Do tagu name sa píše len skutočný názov chodníka ak je vôbec pomenovaný. Nedávajú sa tam opisné názvy typu chodník, cestička, ohnisko, studnička.
majec25 (2021-08-18 14:16:10+00:00): Ďakujem za pripomienku,opravené.
eggie (2021-08-16 10:02:21+00:00): Wanneer hier ook bromfietsen en snorfietsen mogen rijdeb dan zou je aan de barrier=block moped=yes  en mofa=yes  kunnen toevoegen.
access=no heb ik verwijderd. dat geeft wel eens problemen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-16 10:04:11+00:00): bicycle en foot=yes is gewoon default op wegen en hoef je niet aan te geven.
MVG
eggie
elastiek (2021-08-16 10:24:20+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast!
eggie (2021-08-16 10:31:58+00:00): Top!
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 08:31:16+00:00): plese align img first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109739583
WingardiumMapiosa (2022-12-08 19:54:23+00:00): Hi, Violaine_Do. Santurce is no longer with the team, but I see that you have realigned the piers here. Thank you for the feedback, I also saw your comment about the 50cm accuracy government data in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119149134. The team has been notified of this and will keep it in mind going forward.
eggie (2021-08-16 10:07:24+00:00): Dag elastiek.. Je hebt hier de veldwegen veranderd in highway=path Zijn dit werkelijk smalle paden geworden die niet geschikt zouden zijn voor bv een landbouwvoertuig?
tracktype=grade4 is een specificatie die hoort bij een highway=track.
Die regel zou dan verwijderd moeten worden.
Of zijn het wellicht toch gewoon tracks?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-16 10:09:52+00:00): Een breedte van 30 cm zou je wel een path noemen.. dan even de regel tracktype=grade4 verwijderen.
Hier de uitleg over tracktype. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype

Mapse,
eggie
elastiek (2021-08-16 10:16:25+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dit oude pad voor landbouwvoertuigen is nu inderdaad een smal pad voor wandelaars geworden. Ik pas het aan!

Vr.gr. Edwin
Truchin (2021-08-17 09:12:20+00:00): Bonjour Aubin,

Ce n'est pas une piste cyclable ni une voie verte mais une des nombreuses voies du bois fermées à la circulation générale. Donc Track convient mieux. Je corrige en conséquence.
Aubin Bettiol (2021-08-18 08:54:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre vigilance. 
Un utilisateur nous avait signalé l'aménagement de la manière suivante : "Piste cyclable / pieton depuis avenu de l'hippodrome à allée de la reine marguerite". Cela correspond-t-il à un aménagement effectivement présent ?
Truchin (2021-08-18 09:00:18+00:00): Bonjour Aubin. 

C'est effectivement ce que j'ai répondu plus haut. C'est ainsi sur le terrain depuis bien plus de 10 ans.

Thomas
manoj@123 (2021-08-16 10:40:23+00:00): Here, I also added surface tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109740417
eggie (2021-08-16 10:23:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Op een fietspad hoort niet de tag bicycle=designated..  
Het is immers al een fietspad.  foot=designated kan beter foot=yes zijn.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Dodko (2021-08-16 12:34:27+00:00): Pre položku start_date použite formát dátumu rrrr-mm-dd
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:start_date
JozoAna (2021-08-16 13:58:46+00:00): Zmenil som dátum na formát rrrr-mm-dd. Vďaka
francians (2021-08-16 14:12:09+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il contributo. Il nome non è necessario in quanto i tag sono già auto-esplicativi

Francesco
Max Peverada (2021-08-16 19:30:07+00:00): Meglio specificare? Poteva anche essere privato… ciao
ivanbranco (2021-08-17 15:32:19+00:00): Fosse privato potresti aggiungere access=private, i nomi devono essere propri e non descrittivi
Max Peverada (2021-08-17 15:55:12+00:00): Eliminato.
dgitto (2024-03-25 15:38:02+00:00): ricorda di non utilizzare il tag "name" se l'oggetto non ha un nome proprio. (come "fountain")
ma-rt-in (2021-08-25 18:47:36+00:00): Hallo,
wer genau darf den diesen Weg nutzen?
das sieht nämlich sehr widersprüchlich aus.

vg
scheukrt (2021-09-10 08:52:35+00:00): Ich denke ich habe das Problem beseitigt.
ma-rt-in (2021-09-17 17:55:06+00:00): Äh nein.
Also nochmals die Frage, wer darf da lang? ich denke nicht, das wir 4 access werte brauchen.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:03:07+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:03:18+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
iWowik (2021-08-18 09:48:46+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте пожалуйста принятый порядок написания названий улиц
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Примеры ваших ошибок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65526335#map=17/64.47753/37.93960
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973498130#map=19/64.47851/37.93493

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
iWowik (2021-08-18 09:50:39+00:00): Я про правила уже вам писал раннее, но вы, к сожалению, не отреагировали.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108865244
skquinn (2021-08-22 13:43:01+00:00): I'm sure these edits correct something. The purpose of a changeset comment is to describe what has been changed, or specifically what those corrections are: "Improve road alignment" for example.

Also, please save before moving to a different area. The bounding box of this changeset includes all of Mexico as well as a chunk of India. This makes needless noise for someone trying to review the local changes in, say, parts of Houston, Texas (US).
eggie (2021-08-16 12:32:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM. 
Thanks for your contribution.
I added some additional  info at the addressnode.. shop=clothes  , phone and website.


Greetz,
eggie
literan (2021-08-16 16:26:57+00:00): но там ведь адресация по улице, к чему эти теги?
Grass-snake (2021-08-16 16:38:18+00:00): Полный адрес (который участвует в адресе) будет такой:

обл Московская, г Красногорск, д Путилково, ул Новотушинская, д. *

Именно так и все эти поля важны. Постараюсь на неделе обвести границы и проверить правильность работы в Nominatim.
Сейчас я на трёх домах проверяю, если что — исправлю.
literan (2021-08-16 21:41:46+00:00): ну ок, но у нас же сокращенная система нумерации. И ты уверен, что эти новостройки на месте вырубленного леса находятся на территории деревни Путилково, которая в километре на Ю?
Grass-snake (2021-08-17 04:45:21+00:00): Да, посмотрел по генплану это часть Путилково, там достаточно хорошо границы проведены:
https://krasnogorsk-adm.ru/doc/doc_5416.html
Frans S (2021-08-16 13:48:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please be more accurate in your mappings and square each rectangular building with the Q key.
PS.  Cars on a road don't need to be mapped as a building  :-)
best regards and keep mapping
DaveF (2021-08-22 20:59:04+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298120838#map=16/53.2093/-3.1287

This is not a pitch
ALu68 (2021-08-18 07:11:28+00:00): Hello Raji27_manu,

Welcome to OSM.

The hashtag is not a name!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972494868/history

Before proceeding with the mapping, please read the wiki first!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

See wiki for name:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
See wiki for building: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Regards. Andre
DressyPear4 (2021-08-16 15:31:14+00:00): Olá, não use nomes genéricos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109745534
Rainero (2021-08-17 20:09:57+00:00): Hallo MobiWert1,
die Firma Reifenpunkt ist bei deinem Edit an der falschen Stelle gelandet, denn hier ist die Rötelstraße 23.
Die Firma gibt es schon an der richtigen Stelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45518382 , allerdings als shop=car_repair. 
Ich mache aus beiden eins und nehme die passenderen Attirbute.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Dodko (2021-08-16 12:47:40+00:00): Použili ste building=house to je pre spojené nesamostatné rodinné domy.
Zmenil som na building=detached to je samostatný dom.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached

Doplnil som aj susedné domy.