piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-05-13 09:13:22+00:00): Dag Willem.. Niet helemaal correct.
Begin nooit met access=no
Dat betekent Verboden Toegang  Staat dat hier vooraan.
foot=yes hoeft niet op een wandelpad. Het is default.
bicycle=yes.. Staat dat aangegeven.... of is het wellicht een highway=path

Kort door de bocht.
Een G7 bord vooraan.. Dan highway=footway
Geen bord dan highway=path Dat routeert ook voor fietsers.
direction=both is overbodig. 
Haal in ieder geval access=no weg, want je pad zal straks bijna verdwijnen van de kaart. Het is immers Verboden toegang. ??
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 10:02:22+00:00): access=no heb ik vast  verwijderd.
Het is gewoon niet correct. 
MVG
eggie
OmeWillem (2021-05-13 10:03:16+00:00): Helder, dank je wel.

Het gaat hier om een pad dat zowel door voetgangers als fietsers mag worden gebruikt en ook wordt gebruikt.
OmeWillem (2021-05-13 10:10:46+00:00): Sorry, ik heb inderdaad nogal wat wijzigingen aangebracht. Het is niet mijn bedoeling er een rommeltje van te maken. Ik zal proberen te herstellen wat je in je feedback aangeeft. :'(
eggie (2021-05-13 10:19:03+00:00): Er wordt je niet kwalijk genomen. Vooral plezier in mappen krijgen!
Je ziet steeds meer van die paden met bebording 'Houdt rekening met elkaar'
Meestal kijk ik eerst welk bord er staat.
G7 dan footway
G13,11, 12a cycleway
Onduidelijk (He.. houdt rekening met elkaar)  dan gebruik ik highway=path.
mapse
eggie
jgon6 (2021-05-14 00:12:55+00:00): Why did you remove this gate? It is very much present. It might not be visible in imagery, because it is only a year old or so. They did have the gates open over this past winter, but the gates are a permanent structure. If you need proof I can go take a picture.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104620875
eggie (2021-05-13 09:17:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi

Deze tag niet gebruiken
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=basin

Meestal gebruik ik landuse=basin.. 
basin=detention
en dat leg ik dan los op de landuse = grass
mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 09:21:02+00:00): Je hebt verder een polygoon onderbroken van de landuse grass.
Editor iD maakt daar dan kennelijk een multipolygoon van. Ik zal het herstellen.
Je edits
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104621024
eggie (2021-05-13 09:22:50+00:00): Polygoon landuse grass weer gesloten
eggie (2021-05-13 09:24:44+00:00): Dit klopt niet.. Die mast staat al getagd op een node .. en precies op de juiste plaats. Dus beter verwijderen.
De mast is hier dan ook verbonden met de hoogspanningskabel. 
Haal je je toevoeging weer weg?
gr eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 09:40:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback

De Doolhof met naam staat al getagd op het vlak.
leisure=park hoort niet op een adresnode.
De openingstijden kun je toevoegen aan het vlak 
tourism=attraction attraction=maze

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-13 09:49:20+00:00): De aanvullende tags van de doolhof heb ik overgezet naar het vlak.
Het park heb ik verwijderd. 
Kijk steeds in de wiki hoe te taggen of vraag even om hulp.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 09:55:27+00:00): openingstijden aangepast conform afspraken osm
Apr-Oct 10:30-17:00
eggie (2021-05-13 09:43:46+00:00): Beste Star  De dubbele tagging heb ik hier verwijderd
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 09:44:50+00:00): Graag eenduidig mappen. gebruik gewoon de BAG addresnode en pas daar de tagging aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 09:45:55+00:00): natural=vvv Ruurlo verwijderd.
Wat is je bedoeling?
eggie
JriSv250 (2021-05-14 21:54:18+00:00): Please limit the geographic range of your changesets.
tom_yorados (2021-05-13 12:19:44+00:00): Sehr schön.
user_5359 (2021-05-13 12:53:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
4004 (2021-05-16 23:38:29+00:00): Bitte halten Sie den Changeset-Bereich kleiner
dgitto (2021-06-06 10:42:41+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
Romwriter (2021-06-05 12:32:40+00:00): Hallo rabe316, Du hast hier einige der Schäden, die U__Bolt angerichtet hat (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5084), bereits behoben. Vielen Dank dafür! Sind die maxspeed-Tags im weiteren Verlauf der Straße richtig? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
rabe316 (2021-06-05 16:58:33+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,
das sollte passen, Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung auf 70km/h gilt nur in Richtung Alzey - Flomborn.
Romwriter (2021-06-05 17:38:16+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank für die Antwort!
eggie (2021-05-13 09:57:52+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Svp geen adressen aanmaken. Die zijn er al. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
eggie
Bąbel (2021-05-17 09:17:05+00:00): Jeśli nie widziałeś oznaczeń drogi powiatowej to kłania się okulista. Gdyby jednak nie wada wzroku to real jest inny.   Poprawiaj osobiscie spotkane błędy.
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-13 11:17:42+00:00): Atstačiau neteisingai ištrinta pievą.
eggie (2021-05-13 09:59:21+00:00): Beste Ome Willem  waterway=wadi is niet meer in gebruik

Dat heb ik eerder al aangegeven. Kijk in de wiki hoe te taggen. Zie commentaar eerdere changesets.
eggie (2021-05-13 10:05:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi
eggie (2021-05-13 10:08:18+00:00): Prima  en wil je het helemaal goed doen dan kan mofa=no er nog bij.
MVG
eggie
nevw (2021-05-23 05:32:15+00:00): Hi
You have added oneway=yes to long sections of Kilcoy Murgon Road and Monsildale Road.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=104626129&zoom=13&lat=-26.71803&lon=152.45873&layers=B000000TTTFT
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178064079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196831128#map=11/-26.7867/152.5836
This seems very unlikely to be correct to me.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
Can you check thanks.
BigBirdy (2021-05-23 06:22:21+00:00): Thank you for that, it was not my intent to make those two roads one-way. I have fixed them.
nevw (2021-05-23 06:45:43+00:00): Thanks for being so prompt in fixing.
I noticed a couple of others with oneway tags that I would like to checked too thanks...
Tower and Mortimer Roads...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374066521
and part of Kings Bore Road...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717045721#map=15/-26.0943/153.0995
Regards
Nev
BigBirdy (2021-05-23 08:36:44+00:00): Thanks again. Tower and Mortimer Roads are indeed oneway (something to do with the timber industry I believe). I've changed Kings Bore to not oneway, but it's complicated ... beach erosion made it physically impossible for traffic in the other direction, and it may now be closed to all traffic. I shall investigate
nevw (2021-05-23 08:57:45+00:00): Thanks for checking.
Cheers
eggie (2021-05-13 10:06:25+00:00): Top!  Nuttige aanvulling zo.
gr eggie
Matze1234qwerty (2021-05-13 09:56:12+00:00): Oops. Messed up, added the alternative postcode as postcode:source by accident. Will remove.
JriSv250 (2021-05-14 21:54:09+00:00): Please limit the geographic range of your changesets.
JriSv250 (2021-05-14 21:54:01+00:00): Please limit the geographic range of your changesets.
kapazao (2021-05-13 16:18:55+00:00): Hola, ¿toda la manzana son los baños? me parece que no. De hecho hay un hotel en uno de esos edificios.
Deberías poner los baños como edificio o nodo, posicionándolo en el lugar correcto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104627056
eggie (2021-05-13 10:53:25+00:00): Hier heb je net het verkeerde object verwijderd. Dus de hoogspanningskabel is door het verwijderen van de node naar het noorden gesprongen. We taggen in OSM de masten op een node . Niet op een vlak. aan de node zit de kabel vast.
Ik probeer even te reverten.
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 10:56:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #104630716

Deze changeset heb ik teruggedraaid. 
De kabel is weer terug. 
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104627493
Nu natuurlijk een foutmelding power binnen power.
Dus je zelf getekende vlak verwijderen. Het was hier oorspronkelijk correct getagd. 
Kijk je nog even. 
eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 10:35:23+00:00): Hi Mike.. If the shop has closed for ever.. please don't delete the addressnode.. just the shopinfo.

Greetz,
eggie
4004 (2021-05-16 23:20:29+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
места для разьезда тоже можно отметить, но я так понимаю у вас из данных только трек
40° (2021-05-16 23:53:39+00:00): Да. Из данных только трек.
4004 (2021-05-17 00:08:17+00:00): Пригодилась бы съёмка в мапиллари, но понятно что не всегда сподручно
40° (2021-05-17 14:03:18+00:00): Были файлы регистратора. Но остался только один (одна минута записи), аварийный, наверно тряхнуло где то. Я там легко 80 ехал. Уж не знаю это могло бы помочь чем то или нет. Ну и есть 8 фоток дороги и даже с геотегом.
4004 (2021-05-17 16:43:59+00:00): ну вы по воспоминаниям можете проставить smoothness (intermediate наверное?), или что еще видно на фото, может и места для разворотов на них есть. но это все опционально, как и весь осм
40° (2021-05-18 06:40:08+00:00): Если честно я не очень понимаю важность такой детализации. Как это может быть использовано практически? А информация ради информации вряд ли принесет пользу. :-)
4004 (2021-05-18 10:08:20+00:00): вся информация в осм кому то пригодится, но возможно не вам и не сразу.
детализация дорог в основном важна для улучшения навигации и прокладки маршрутов
maraf24 (2021-10-12 22:49:29+00:00): You created a lot of man_made=lighthouse.
How about man_made=beacon?
How did you tell them apart?
user_5359 (2021-05-13 12:16:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use  an own node instead using a postbox node!
user_5359 (2021-05-13 12:21:49+00:00): I repair this, your new node ist https://www.osm.org/node/8728222739
Buraddo (2021-07-29 13:54:43+00:00): Hello, I think this node has a bad location, can you take a look what happened with it's coordinates? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8727837488
kate_rocketdata (2021-08-19 14:38:28+00:00): Good afternoon! Thank you for your comment, we will check and fix it.
RunTrails (2021-06-07 18:38:37+00:00): This trail also does not exist.
clnhrn (2021-06-08 05:45:46+00:00): I'll check it out and will delete this. Thank you!
4004 (2021-05-16 23:40:47+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
давно не видно было вас!
санта уже отмечена, но я что то думал она еще не открыта.
если хотите пользоваться мапсми, свежие карты можно взять на https://download.openstreetmap.by/
argon3119 (2021-06-07 13:38:46+00:00): Curious as to the source of these paths, especially the one on the east side of the creek.  I saw them on Gaiagps while planning a backpacking trip.
clnhrn (2021-06-07 14:44:09+00:00): Hi there! The main source I used for mapping the 2 paths is the USGS 3D Elevation layer available in JOSM. When trails are hard to make out on satellite imagery, I mainly use it to look for traces of paths/trails.
RunTrails (2021-06-07 18:36:54+00:00): No, these trails do not exist. If you don't know the name of a trail please do not add it, this is designated wilderness and accurate maps are a necessity to keep people safe. Please delete these trails.
argon3119 (2021-06-07 18:42:48+00:00): I agree with RunTrails.  Gaiagps uses Openstreet Maps as source data, and I instantly noticed the cluster of trails that did not make sense given my last visit.  The Stonecoal trail which these join is an actual path.  It these have only been inferred from from imagery, I'd suggest removing them.
clnhrn (2021-06-08 05:44:20+00:00): Thank you for taking your time on checking this! I'll be glad to make the changes as advised.
argon3119 (2021-06-08 11:58:37+00:00): Thank you.  I see several other paths that you created in the Dolly Sods area around the same time frame.  Have you been there to be positive of their actual existence, or where the also inferred from imagery?
rthik007 (2021-05-19 11:15:36+00:00): Hi etana,
I have changed the classification based on surrounding area
way 92002821
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104955675
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104630052
Maptapper (2021-05-13 20:05:44+00:00): This looks OK
RunTrails (2021-06-07 18:42:13+00:00): There's no random path here that intersects Big Stonecoal and takes you nowhere.
clnhrn (2021-06-08 05:47:02+00:00): Got it! I'll delete the path. Thank you.
user_3961358 (2021-05-13 12:47:22+00:00): What is your source for the new tracks and paths? Only imagery or survey as well? Asking out of experience unfortunately.
SHARCRASH (2021-05-13 13:33:44+00:00): Hi! 

Seriously? I thought by now that it was clear i don't contribute with guesses. Depends which feature you are talking about... Some are personal knowledge, others are obvious on resources available, others are just new because i detail a way in different sections like when a track grade1 becomes a grade3 for example, or a footway and steps, those are new. As said in the past i don't want to mislead people and neither be misleaded myself since I do use the map. The only times i may be mistaken is when i see something new, record it in OSM and the next days i check it. If invalid, i delete of course. I ride mountain biking, this allows me to survey a lot even in nature.

On your hand... You should not name  woods or forests from a locality. Those are names that are part of the place itself. Definitely not a wood like when it is named "Schleedbesch". Schack or "Klenge Schack" are not names of woods, they ware localities.

Also an embankment is not a just a slope, it's supposed to be man made, hence the key man_made. Classic example i do would be the slope of covered reservoirs or Tumulus sites. Those are clearly not natural. You had made the slope fo a hill as embankment, a hill is not man made. hence why i deleted it. 

For the privacy of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121108807/ I'm really wondering if it's fully private because:
- part of the way is in a neutral zone, no parcel, so very likely part of the grass can be used as a public beach.
- part of it was wrong, meaning it was going over a retaining wall.
- campings usually do not privatise their ways because of hikes, attracting clients, etc. 
But doubtfully i've let it private anyway, waiting for a confirmation.

You've still not corrected the mistakes you've introduced and i warned you about and even gave you the tools to spot them. Please correct them first before contributing other features.
user_3961358 (2021-05-13 14:14:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8245639482 For example is long overgrown, I walk in that area regularly. Some tracks you marked grade1 only looked grade1 one from above, they are unpaved. The "private" path has many signs around that people shouldn't stick around there, only guests. Toponymes are super vague, Bësch means wood. For me it's a better way to designate a bigger area. Localities can mean any size :(
SHARCRASH (2021-05-13 17:10:56+00:00): No waaay, really?! Just kidding, i believe you. 🙂https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448361730 I've added it 4 years ago and last time i checked it was 2 years ago. Time passed, had totally forgotten to plot the steps, 9 months ago had started to enhance accuracy, today (after your contact though) thanks to the LH i've been reminded to plot it correctly+steps. 

For the grade1 which one(s)? Usually it's local survey or other resources as Geoportail's Topo, Mapillary and alikes... Though, a grade1 with time to time rare loose material, like holes or other degradations I still plot it as grade1, it's more releavant IMO. Grade2 only when constantly almost hard with some loose. Also sometimes i noticed some people recorded grade4 tracks whereas under the thin layer of dirt it's grade2. I recall even someone mistakenly recorded surface=dirt with grade1 track. My guess: the contributor didn't realise the dirt is temporarily spread by tractors. Some days of rain and puts the road back with bare asphalt. Again, temporary feats should not be recorded in OSM.

OK for the signs, i hope they are official. Remember what i told you in our email about this residence privatising illegally some forest roads by blocking with chains and signs. Outrageous!

I understand a bigger name is better but tag wise it's really not not right. Locality have sometimes a link to historical facts, nothing to do with the woods/forests. That's really misleading. I don't want to be extreme though, in some situations i find the key name to be useful to input a brief description of a feature. I know many contributors who do this even though it is considered as a bad practice. The problem is that most services rely mostly on the rasterizing of the map, so no description from the data key "description".
eggie (2021-05-13 11:30:18+00:00): correct nu
Deze waarden  staan overigens op de mast.
design	=three-level;one-level	
line_attachment	=anchor	
power	=tower	
ref	=40
tower
Firefishy (2021-05-13 13:50:49+00:00): Awesome updates! Thank you.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-20 05:11:09+00:00): Moin smarties,

natural=water + water=river war schon richtig für Flussflächen. Dies ist die neuere und bevorzugte Variante gegenüber waterway=riverbank.

Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater#River
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74006

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
smarties (2021-10-20 09:25:52+00:00): Moin, Danke für die Info. Ich hatte immer noch nach dem alten verfahren gemappt. Ich werde mir das ganze mal durchlesen. Gruß smarties
mueschel (2021-05-15 12:57:23+00:00): Hallo,
was bedeuten diese Knoten? Sie haben keine korrekten Tags - sind das Wegweiser?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
user_5359 (2021-05-16 15:06:23+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Was willst denn mit den beiden Tags 
"Markierung MTB Sagensteintour"="Markierung MTB Sagensteintour"
"name"="Markierung MTB Sagensteintour"
Ich bin mir sicher, dass die Wander/Fahrradtour Markierung nicht den Namen "Markierung MTB Sagensteintour" hört!
Hast Du Dir mal die Wikiseite zu Wegweisern https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:information%3Dguidepost durch gelesen?
Wenn Du Deine fünf Einträge suchst: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17pg
gileri (2021-05-13 12:13:33+00:00): Bonjour, c'est quoi "ça" dans "ça considère la bretelle comme fermée" ?

Parce que le wiki, OSMAnd, Brouter (et moi) ne sont pas de cet avis :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions

https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/routing/routing.xml#L448

https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/blob/master/misc/profiles2/car-vario.brf#L52
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-05-14 07:42:15+00:00): La bretelle avait été mis avec un "No" sur la case "Tous", or elle est bien ouverte aux voitures (empruntée récemment). Je me suis assuré que le "No" ne soit que pour les cases piétons, cyclistes et cavaliers.
mavl (2021-05-14 16:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104694255 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104566429].
maciek-szn (2021-05-13 12:11:25+00:00): Wycofałem. Punkty adresowe przypisane są już do głównych części budynków. Każda przybudówka nie musi mieć swojego oddzielnego adresu.
Dawid2849 (2021-05-13 12:49:11+00:00): W takim przypadku można dodać nohousenumber=yes ;)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
Nakaner (2021-09-06 10:08:52+00:00): Hallo,

ist dort ein öffentlich zugänglicher Trinkbrunnen/Wasserhahn mit Trinkwasser oder hast du keine bessere Kategorie gefunden, um ein Wasserwerk zu erfassen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
GeochaserSIG (2021-09-06 11:03:43+00:00): Hallo Michael !

es ist kein Trinkbrunnen vorhanden. 
Passende Kategorien standen nicht zur Auswahl. 

Gruß 

Andreas
Nakaner (2021-09-06 15:27:16+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

bitte trage Objekte mit MAPS.ME bzw. OrganicMaps nur ein, wenn es eine passende Kategorie ist. OSM ist weitaus vielfältiger, als die Eingabemaske dieser Apps. Durch das Setzten falscher Attribute wie in diesem Fall führst du Datennutzer in die Irre. Radreisende, die ihre Trinkflaschen auffüllen möchten, werden an dieser Stelle fluchen. Das schadet dem Ruf unseres Projekts, wenn unsere Daten Müll sind.

Ich möchte dich daher bitten, im Zweifelsfall die Änderung bleiben zu lassen oder eine seriöse App zur Bearbeitung, z.B. Vespucci, GoMap! oder den Online-Editor auf openstreetmap.org zu verwenden.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2021-09-06 15:27:24+00:00): Ach ja, ich habe das jetzt korrigiert.
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-07-30 00:49:04+00:00): o edifício ainda se encontra em construção e a passagem entre os edifícios não existe
topolusitania (2021-08-03 21:26:08+00:00): O edificio Botton-Champalimaud Pancreatic Center encontra-se na fase de acabamentos exteriores. A estrutura metálica que vai unir os dois edificios ainda não foi montada.
ravali_78 (2021-05-17 07:24:13+00:00): Hi Fraser K,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with service road.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104804637. 
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104636240
abakus_uploader (2021-05-13 22:32:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kotok (2021-05-19 16:50:24+00:00): Привіт, чому поміняли тег комунікаційної вежі Київстар в с.Тинне з man_made=mast на man_made=tower? Судячи з інформації в вікі там більше підходить man_made=mast. І що це за цифри в назві вежі? Це якась внутрішня інформація?
Yurii Pylypenko (2021-05-19 17:01:28+00:00): Цифри це номери БС які ви бачите в своєму телефоні. Вони також співпадають з номером в державному реєстрі УДЦР (перші 2 цифри це код області, наступні 4 цифри це унікальний код в межах області). Коли Ви в своєму телефоні бачите що в даний момент обслуговує БС №180754 і хочете взнати - звідки цей сигнал прийшов, то можете або глянути в державний реєстр, або по мітках в OSM
Тобто це цифра яка унікально ідентифікує будь-яку БС в будь-якій країні.

Щодо mast vs tower мені без різниці. Для tower відображаються краще підписи, особливо в містах. В сільській місцевості різниця нівелюється у відображенні. Для типу tower текстова інформація також підтягується в OpenTopoMap
kotok (2021-05-20 12:50:17+00:00): Справа в тому, що по правилам osm така інформація немає бути в назві. Для цих даних більше підходить тег ref. Дані що ви вносили було переведено в ref. В телеграмі є активний чат OSM спільноти України. Якщо маєте бажання запрошую  приєднатись. Там можна обговорити ваше питання
kotok (2021-05-20 12:50:51+00:00): https://t.me/osmUA
eggie (2021-05-13 13:17:20+00:00): Ha.. de hersenkraker.. Lijkt me allemaal oke zo...
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-05-13 13:14:14+00:00): Hier de regel tracktype verwijderen. Dat is een specificatie die bij highway=track hoort.
SomeoneElse (2021-06-06 11:20:48+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737999750 seem implausible. "lanes=4;5;3" has clearly been merged from several previous ways, as has the maxspeed. Please check the historical data using overpass when you see tags like this.
Best Regards,
Andy
Omotesando (2021-06-08 14:42:23+00:00): Thanks Andy. I wasn’t sure about the origin of the tags.