piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
obyrnegps (2021-06-25 15:03:43+00:00): Footpaths are important as dedicated rights of way for pedestrians and other vulnerable users of the public realm.  Footpaths and pedestrian areas are the only part of the public realm provided for the safety and enjoyment of vulnerable users of the public realm.   It is not legal to use a mechanically propelled vehicle on a footpath.  It is not legal to park on a footpath.  It is not legal to cycle on footpaths as it endangers pedestrians and other dedicated vulnerable users such as the disabled, babies in buggies, the very young, elderly, visually impaired, the deaf or hard of hearing.  Cyclists are not regarded as sufficiently vulnerable users for footpath access or use on a par with pedestrians unless the footpath has been specifically designed and dedicated for shared use whether segregated or not.  Access for all tagging does not reflect this.  There is too much attention to what vehicles can access a footpath.  Every able body person is a pedestrian first and as such the most vulnerable user of the public realm.  Other vulnerable users of the public realm can share the pedestrian space, but not at the cost of a vulnerability to pedestrians for whom footpaths are dedicated.
There is a language issue also.   Footpaths, sidewalks, footways and paths have overlapping understandings around the globe because English is not a standardised as some think.
In addition to the above, footpaths and soft verges where provided have an important role in general infrastructure.  Underground services for water, sewage, electricity and ICT (including broadband) are generally installed under footpaths in accordance with specified vertical and lateral separation.  This is so that they can be easily located and accessed for repair or upgrade.
It is somewhat arrogant to assume that only a road network meets all routing needs.
VictorIE (2021-06-25 15:39:04+00:00): All of the above is largely irrelevant to OSM and you have been told this several times.

OSM has a set of standards and unnecessarily varying from them makes life more difficult, not simpler.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=no
SomeoneElse (2022-08-28 10:16:16+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  
For the avoidance of doubt, adding "access=no" to a footway tagged with "foot=designated" such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931132223 adds no value and may in fact just confuse people.  Please don't do it.
Best Regards,
Andy
ottwiz (2021-04-22 23:18:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86104135. Sorry, but all county roads are tertiary OR residential, depending on connections. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/West_Virginia
user_5359 (2021-04-24 18:54:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934093066: What is the meaning of payment:None=yes (see also fee:yes)?
SomeoneElse (2021-05-15 19:54:29+00:00): Hello,
What source did you use for this edit? The imagery_used would suggest  
http://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v3/geoeye.map-0zmhzttc/19/437583/270993.png , but that just gives a "Classic styles are no longer supported" message for me.  Another mapper has removed the building you added here because its not visible on any imagery available to OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-05-15 19:45:21+00:00): Hello JoannaD27 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please make sure that, in addition to any hashtags, that you also use good changeset comments that explain to other mappers what changes you are making.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Best Regards,
Andy
cserpell (2021-04-23 16:11:33+00:00): Hola, buenos datos. Una consulta: Al sur oriente hay una calle Kutral y otra Kutrak. ¿Son en verdad distintas o deberían llamarse igual? Muchas gracias!
cserpell (2021-04-23 16:14:10+00:00): Ahh veo que ya lo corregiste, muchas gracias y disculpa.
eggie (2021-04-23 05:55:17+00:00): Dag Stein

name=Pandan village	staat er als name=

Maar je extra voegt toe
name:en		Midnight Roti Shop
name:nl		Midnight Roti Shop


Hoe heet het nu hier?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 05:59:18+00:00): name=Pandan village  aangepast naar nieuwe naam. ..name:en en nl verwijderd

MVG
eggie
Supaplex (2021-04-30 09:02:11+00:00): 你好：

一般我們是修改既有的建築外框，而不是重新繪製建築
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103444486
mavl (2021-04-24 08:22:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101995304, 101999051, 101999062, 101999081, 101999094, 101999107, 101999123, 101999147, 101999159, 101999169, 101999183, 102000121, 102000132, 102000151, 102000174, 102000194, 102000210, 102000225, 102000232, 102000249, 102000265, 102004405, 102129532, 102129547, 102130318, 102130340, 102130366, 102130404, 102130420, 102130438, 102130453, 102131903, 102131920, 102131940, 102131953, 102131970, 102131987, 102132001, 102132023, 102132038, 102132055, 102132068, 102132087, 102132104, 102132118, 102132132, 102132151, 102132165, 102132185, 102134541, 102134564, 102134585, 102134618, 102134646, 102134665, 102134684, 102134701, 102134728, 102134744, 102135761, 102136318, 102136879, 102200426, 102200445, 102200466, 102811729, 102814725, 102870669, 102870755, 102874279, 102875657.
literan (2021-04-24 10:08:30+00:00): а зачем тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502374604/history#map=19/55.87528/37.45457 и street_cabinet и building? это взаимоисключающее. Или это просто шкаф, или здание ,в которое можно войти
Grass-snake (2021-04-24 18:55:12+00:00): Эхм... ну как-бы это Вы сами так внесли 4 года назад.
Я решил не трогать, подумал что это маппинг под рендер.
literan (2021-04-24 22:28:11+00:00): я внес тег building, а вы сегодня добавили man_made=street_cabinet 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502374604/history#map=19/55.87528/37.45457
Grass-snake (2021-04-25 18:22:06+00:00): Сорри, не понял вопроса. Исправил.
mavl (2021-04-25 04:14:56+00:00): Hello. This changeset deleted the real roads. You should not delete real objects. This changeset was reverted.
Glassman (2021-04-24 02:21:01+00:00): #TIP: Addresses are entered as a series of tags, addr:housenumber, addr:street, addr:city and addr:postcode. Can you update the address information for the pharmacy?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103445371
nevw (2021-04-24 00:32:00+00:00): Hi
there are now two unit number 6 in Blantyre Rise.
Can you confirm the existing unit numbers please.
Dave_Walker (2021-04-24 05:24:35+00:00): I've made a further update in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103515293 to remove the duplicates, the 2 properties closest to the entrance were marked incorrectly as #5 and #6 - these are their lot numbers. Actual unit addresses unknown to me.
nevw (2021-04-24 10:06:51+00:00): Thanks Dave
You may be able to note the letterbox numbers a couple at a time as you pass them and update them all once you have a complete list.
nevw (2021-04-24 00:34:47+00:00): There are also two unit #5 ?
ovruni (2021-04-23 05:35:15+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. En este conjunto de cambios se ha ingresado el texto "yeahh ", sin embargo esto no explica a otros usuarios en que han consistido sus cambios. Por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos conjuntos de cambios [0], de tal forma que mas adelante otros usuarios puedan entender en que han consistido sus cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
ovruni (2021-04-23 05:38:15+00:00): De la misma forma en este conjunto de cambios se han ingresado varios nombres en manzanas que son parte del número de casa. Para las etiquetas de dirección puede revisar en la documentación el espacio de nombres "addr". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:addr
Saludos
portalaventura (2021-04-23 04:19:44+00:00): weverson, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:54:58+00:00): When you move details from a node to a building, please delete that node because it is redundant. As you have this, it looks like there is a motel inside of a motel. Please come back and fix this, regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4443100165
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103447730
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-06 04:53:29+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-07 13:28:06+00:00): I don't understand how blackboxlogic's advice here "is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance"?
blackboxlogic (2021-05-07 13:49:37+00:00): Tldr I said delete the redundant node because I thought that would be easy to understand, user Lyx asked them to stop deleting nodes (to preserve history) and to combine them instead. These two direction conflicted so now they copy paste a "we don't know what to do" message. I talked to one of there organizers and thought this issue was cleared up. But there is a long long tail of unresolved bad edits.
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-07 14:52:53+00:00): At first, we were deleting the nodes after moving the details and somebody said to not delete the node but keep it to preserve the history and now we are doing as we are told.
We only do what our client tells us to do.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-09 09:55:55+00:00): blackboxlogic, thanks for the explanation.

Utsab Khatiwada,
I sympathise with your problem, and have already suggested that the person who's directing your edits here engages directly with the OSM US community.
alzyee (2021-04-26 01:20:28+00:00): Is there a reason to add a zig zag to Delos Street? 
It looks like a straight road so I am guessing it was an error and will re-align it to be straight.
yadathot (2021-04-26 08:50:46+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and making changes. Apologies for the misalignment of the road.
I will be extra cautious going forward. Happy to learn from you! 

Regards, 
yadathot
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:55:55+00:00): I see that you left duplicate nodes behind in many of your edits. Please go back and clean up your changes. This tool may help you
https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Utsab%20Khatiwada%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Utsab%20Khatiwada%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103450505
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
yadathot (2021-04-23 05:38:14+00:00): Modified the geometry of roads as per Private Maxar imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
mavl (2021-04-24 08:22:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101995304, 101999051, 101999062, 101999081, 101999094, 101999107, 101999123, 101999147, 101999159, 101999169, 101999183, 102000121, 102000132, 102000151, 102000174, 102000194, 102000210, 102000225, 102000232, 102000249, 102000265, 102004405, 102129532, 102129547, 102130318, 102130340, 102130366, 102130404, 102130420, 102130438, 102130453, 102131903, 102131920, 102131940, 102131953, 102131970, 102131987, 102132001, 102132023, 102132038, 102132055, 102132068, 102132087, 102132104, 102132118, 102132132, 102132151, 102132165, 102132185, 102134541, 102134564, 102134585, 102134618, 102134646, 102134665, 102134684, 102134701, 102134728, 102134744, 102135761, 102136318, 102136879, 102200426, 102200445, 102200466, 102811729, 102814725, 102870669, 102870755, 102874279, 102875657.
Kha_nam (2021-04-24 04:36:23+00:00): Hi GrantLee 
Fixed the alignement of the service way kindly refer with way 377571988
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103513492
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103453409
seav (2021-05-18 11:48:03+00:00): Question: Do you hide non-road features or only download roads? For example: when you split Loyola Street to add road-related tags in this changeset, you inadvertently broke two boundary relations.
GOwin (2021-05-19 23:43:26+00:00): The issue should've been caught by the JOSM validator, whether or not I filter the data. I wonder why that was missed.

I'll look into this issue, and check those boundaries again. 

Thanks for the heads-up!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
abakus_uploader (2021-04-23 22:32:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
abakus_uploader (2021-04-23 22:32:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Buraddo (2021-04-23 09:50:09+00:00): Hello Johnny, are you sure that the agricultural roads are passing under the new ring road? I have added them when it was opened by looking at inaugural photos and dash cam footage. The ring road is on level and I am pretty sure that the agricultural roads were cut and no bridges exist for them. Also, I see that you reverted Strada Poligonului to the old position, while it was translated a few meters
DD1GJ (2021-04-23 12:17:38+00:00): Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Durch das Löschen der Linie wurde ebenfalls die Gebäuderelatin mit allen Informationen gelöscht.

Lösche bitte keine Dinge, deren Bedeutung nicht kennst. Verwende bitte JOSM, denn dieser Editor gibt in solchen Fällen eine Warnung aus.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
limes11 (2021-04-24 09:49:40+00:00): Hallo Dieter, 

vielen Dank fuer die Aenderungen hier. Ist die Zufahrtsstrasse zur B56 nun freigegeben? Du hast hier zwar den highway Wert veraendert, aber einen construction-Tag stehengelassen. Kann der weg? Vermutlich sollten die drei Endstuecke auch anders erfasst werden, mit primary_link. Letzte Frage: An der "mittleren" Ampel, wohin darf man dort abbiegen? Vermutlich nicht nach rechts, oder? 

Viele Gruesse, Limes
Dieter Müller (2021-04-24 14:42:34+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank- glatt übersehen. b56n und Durchfahrt Heerweg wurden erst gestern gegen 12 Uhr freigegeben. War verspätet, da man ursprünglich schon am 7.4. fertig war. VG
hsc666 (2021-04-23 10:21:20+00:00): Hallo LukasLangeDE und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hattest hier eine Klippe eingetragen aber als Aussichtspunkt benannt. Ich habe das mal korrigiert und den Eigennamen entfernt, da ich annehme, dass dort kein gleichlautendes Schild vor Ort steht.

Falls ein Weg zu dem Punkt führt, könntest Du den noch ergänzen.

Fragen gern hier hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103458108 .

VG
hsc666
Supaplex (2021-04-23 09:51:35+00:00): 重覆加路徑了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103460194
Jacques Lavignotte (2021-04-23 10:44:16+00:00): Bonjour Carole28,

Merci pour vos contributions sur OSM. 

Sur La Gargante le numéro de téléphone  n'est pas correctement renseigné : 06 09 73 19 12 plutôt : +33 6 09 73 19 12

Et puis pourquoi mettre ce restaurant sur un 'point' ET un 'chemin' ?

A votre disposition pour en discuter.

Continuez !
Amicalement, Jacques à Poitiers
Carole28 (2021-04-23 11:52:21+00:00): Bonjour jacques
J’ai voulu supprimer « la maison des antiquaires » et ajouter le bar épicerie qui est à l’angle de la rue et du chemin moque-souris. 
Cordialement 
Carole
Buraddo (2021-04-23 09:55:16+00:00): Hello, I see that you have merged a few roads; I am again warning you that those roads were part of different relations (road classifiers, turn restrictions and destination signs) and by merging them you destroyed those relations. Please take care and verify the relation membership of each way that you are merging, even if they have the same tags
johnnybegoode (2021-04-23 10:01:07+00:00): Yes, it is possible but I check some bike paths and they went on that roads.
Buraddo (2021-04-23 13:27:03+00:00): Changeset reverted in #103485180 and valid tags were readded in #103485267 (it was easier than to do partial revert)
Harel M (2022-12-01 21:13:58+00:00): Hi,
Can you please either remove this point or change it to the right OSM tag. This doesn't look like a tourist attraction in any way. If this is part of the איצטרובל single, please add the description or photos there. Thanks.
aceman444 (2024-07-18 23:23:30+00:00): Yes, but playground:theme is used 1000 times more and is documented.
eggie (2021-04-23 08:27:56+00:00): Dag oldedub.
Tip.. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert nog al eens schade op. Hier ook .. Berghumerstraat 6 ligt nu heel ergens anders
Zie http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103463275

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 08:31:57+00:00): Adresnodes hersteld
olo81 (2021-04-23 16:40:51+00:00): A jest użytkowany? w dąbrowie górniczej przebudowują układ drogowy i remontują tory. 
Sprawdziłeś chociaż historię edycji?
C2oc4 (2021-05-02 10:09:34+00:00): Dzwoniłem do dyżurnego PKP (9 dni temu) podczas zdarzenia na torach i taką iformację otrzymałem - może się dyżurny ruchu zakręcił nie wiem jak powiedział tak zmieniłem :)
MarcoR (2021-04-24 07:26:43+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto/a!
La posizione del ristorante sembra essere diversa da quella riportata nel suo sito web, potresti controllare se è corretta?
NightH (2021-05-18 11:24:03+00:00): A győri belső körgyűrű még csak tervezett fázisban van, kérlek ennek megfelelően módosítsd a szerkesztéseidet.
Török Ádám (2021-05-19 10:32:57+00:00): Sajnos nem találtam olyan opciót , hogy tervezett utszakasz , ezert más tipust választottam. Kérlek segíts a megfelelő úttípust kiválasztani. Köszönettel. Ádám