piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-05-02 14:57:43+00:00): Dag Zwaan. Je vraagt om feedback.
Lijkt me oke. Probeer wel plakken van je pad  aan de landuse te voorkomen.
Ik heb het weer losgemaakt.
Kort door de bocht . Iets is een footway als er een G7 bord staat of duidelijk alleen vor wandelaars bedoeld. Staat er geen bord dan highway=path, maar dan is het soms nodig om vehicle=no te taggen. 
MVG
eggie
GinaroZ (2021-05-03 10:39:29+00:00): You seem to have moved a number of objects however Bing imagery is out of alignment with the OSM data here. Now all of the bollards near the Parliament are too close to the road.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 15:37:56+00:00): Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41462940
Don't use the name=* tag to describe what something is.
natural=water + water=pond is enough.
name=Pond is redundant. Unless of course this pond really has the name "Pond".
See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
googlenaut (2021-11-30 18:53:04+00:00): full agree, but .. I've changed the waypoints only, not the naming set by another user. please take a look at the changeset history.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 19:02:49+00:00): version 8 was by eisa and version 9 was by you...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41462940/history
Check this screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sm5m1k5pufhuzb1/pond.png?dl=0
you added the name=Pond.
googlenaut (2021-12-02 11:07:26+00:00): I did it with JOSM 6 month ago. maybe a fault autofill. anyway .. fixed now.
Lee Carré (2021-10-26 15:50:19+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/1281988
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:38:39+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:39:03+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:39:35+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:39:44+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:40:01+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:40:19+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:40:28+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:40:42+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:40:54+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:41:03+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:41:13+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:41:24+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:41:55+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:42:07+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:42:19+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:43:00+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:43:14+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:43:28+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:43:38+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:43:49+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:44:03+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:44:15+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:45:35+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:45:45+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:46:00+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:46:15+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
TomPar (2021-05-03 04:29:45+00:00): Hi Tom.  I'm a fellow local Belmont OSM mapper.  I've spruced up a lot of MA "public lands" this past year in OSM, including much of Belmont.  FYI: your changeset messed up a landcover multipolygon I had created.  No biggie, but just wanted to bring it to your attention.  You may want to consider learning JOSM as it's far more powerful.  It seems you're a new mapper?  I'm happy to chat more if you're so inclined.  Cheers.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103998791
Tom Grimble (2021-05-05 12:27:59+00:00): Didn't intend to mess anything up for you.  I am a member of the Belmont Land Management Committee and am trying to make sure the information on the property we manage is accurate.  Noticed many trails that did not accurately reflect access, added new trail names that were recently approved by committee, added a new trail that we just created last Saturday, and corrected on trail that was not shown in the right location.  Always happy to learn more or collaborate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103998791
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:46:35+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:46:44+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:47:06+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:47:24+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:47:36+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:47:45+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:48:26+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:48:32+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:48:42+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:49:02+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:49:17+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:49:33+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:50:06+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:50:14+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:50:39+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:50:48+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:51:04+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:51:15+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:51:27+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:51:44+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:52:38+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
legofahrrad (2022-02-17 20:24:45+00:00): Moin!
Hier hast du schon vor längerer Zeit etwas geändert. Es sieht ein bisschen danach aus, als hättest du Zugang auf das Gelände der Bremer Stahlwerke.
Wenn dies so ist, wäre es super nett, wenn du dir mal die Hinweise auf dem Gelände anschauen könntest, da diese eine Überprüfung vor Ort benötigen.

Zum Beispiel diese Hinweise:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/62546
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/281315

Viele Grüße!
Lee Carré (2021-11-17 19:52:49+00:00): N.B.; these StreetComplete quest-answers were collected offline over ~2 years.
user_3022894 (2021-05-02 15:06:47+00:00): source=Esri Clarity
PT-53 (2021-05-09 07:25:19+00:00): Hallo ub-bert,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an diesem Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5005730720/history#map=18/47.77126/9.13974&layers=N
das Merkmal
barrier=gate
eingetragen.
Damit hast Du - wohl unabsichtlich - die Bahnhofstraße an dieser Stelle gesperrt.
Siehe:
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=19/47.77106/9.13818/standard&lonlats=9.138111,47.770957;9.138246,47.770873&profile=car-eco

Wolltest Du diese Zufahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938091962/history
absperren?
Dann sollte das Gate auch (nur) auf dieser Straße eingezeichnet werden. Auch sollten bei einem Gate und auf dem Straßenabschnitt hinter dem Gate die entspr. Access-Werte eingetragen werden.
Wiki Gate:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=gate?uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-05-10 06:49:00+00:00): Hallo ub-bert, 
das Gate hast Du ja zwischenzeitlich verschoben. Ergänzt Du dann auch noch die fehlenden Access-Merkmale am Gate und an der Straße?
Grüße
Proxy72 (2021-05-04 03:04:03+00:00): Okay, sehr eben sind die Straßen aber nicht. Aber du hast da mehr Erfahrung.
Romwriter (2021-05-04 18:22:28+00:00): So richtig glücklich bin ich persönlich mit der Gleichsetzung fast aller Arten von Natursteinpflasterung auch nicht, aber die verlinkten Wiki-Seiten sind eindeutig, und auch anderswo in Bremen wird unhewn_cobblestone praktisch nicht verwendet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103999761
pesec (2021-05-05 08:32:21+00:00): Для точек интереса, чей адрес совпадает с основным адресом здания, отдельна писать адрес не нужно. Указывать Город для внутригородских объектов так же не требуется.
iWowik (2021-05-05 09:21:48+00:00): Но ведь можно.
А город так и нужно, если следовать описанию в вики
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

If you know them and if they exist, please add:
    addr:city=*
    addr:postcode=* (adding to single elements might depend on local mapping practices)
    addr:country=* (depending on the mapping practices in your country)
trial (2021-06-17 20:18:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936931247 Let's describe it as a pond! ;-)
Gruebel (2021-06-17 20:23:24+00:00): Yes you are right it is not a lake :). but I would prefer water=stream_pool.
trial (2021-06-17 20:51:00+00:00): Didn't knew this one. Yes, sure with such a tag, no need for leisure=bathing_place ;-)
Skinoku (2021-05-24 12:16:24+00:00): Guardando questo changeset, Via Ronchi è mappata come tertiary.
Ciò provoca un'incongruenza su osmose in quanto agli estremi prosegue come service o track.
Pensi che si possa modificare in service / unclassified?
canfe (2021-05-24 18:53:17+00:00): Hai ragione l'ho messa unclassified per il pezzo centrale
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 21:09:55+00:00): Olá,

esta restrição de conversão incluída por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613674

Foi quebrada por outro mapeador.

Você poderia excluir ou consertar ela?
Hb- (2021-08-29 19:28:21+00:00): Hallo, vor dieser Änderung bestand die Laubaner Straße aus zwei Abschnitten. Auf dem östlichen Teil verlief die Relation 'Jakobsweg'. Diese bog dann  in die Bennoburg ab.  

Durch das Zusammenfassen der scheinbar gleichen Straßenabschnitte  wurde die Relation unbrauchbar gemacht. 

Das Problem ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110424852 wieder behoben. Der Weg 24233362 wurde wiederhergestellt.

Für nachhaltiges Arbeiten in OSM empfiehlt sich der JOSM-Editor, der solche Fehler zu vermeiden hilft. 

Besten Gruß!
ravali_78 (2021-05-03 07:42:05+00:00): Hi chanceVVI,
I have edited the highway crossing @node 8134217320.
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104034866.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104001445
mavl (2021-05-03 12:42:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет для "Ленты" тег name:ru=Lenta. Напишите, пожалуйста, как можно убедиться, что супермаркет по-русски называется Lenta? На здании имеется вывеска с таким названием?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5111481529
pesec (2021-05-05 08:30:15+00:00): наименование правки должно отражать суть внесенных изменений.
JamJar (2021-05-02 15:59:40+00:00): Meant to tag as based on ground survey and GPS traces.
flohoff (2021-05-06 15:27:03+00:00): Moin,
müsste das dann nicht access=customers nicht access=no sein? Und da Besucher bestimmt auch drauf dürfen ggfs sogar permissive?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270217794
JuanCarlos80 (2021-05-06 16:13:49+00:00): Bezüglich der überwachsenen Pfade (dort wurden teilweise absichtlich Bäume dicht auf den Weg gepflanzt und tote Stämme quer liegen gelassen) ist der tag access=no sicher angeraten.

Bezüglich des allgemeinen Zutritts: Im Nordosten der Anlage gibt es ein Schild mit der Aufschrift "Reit u. Fahrverein Detmold e.V. / Benutzung des Reitgeländes nur für Vereinsmitglieder / Jede Haftung des Vereins ist ausgeschlossen". Allerdings ist unklar, was mit Reitgelände alles gemeint ist - die hier markierten Reitwege durch die ehemalige Schießanlage sind im Osten ausgezeichnet mit VZ 238.

Spaziergänger laufen eh immer wieder durch diesen lost place. Hast du einen Vorschlag?
DressyPear4 (2021-05-03 03:27:09+00:00): Olá, se o local não possui nome mantenha esse campo em branco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104002382
Walmira Lopes (2021-05-04 02:00:47+00:00): Entendi, Obrigada.
dieterdreist (2025-02-23 09:30:28+00:00): Hi, I just noticed you deleted the fountain of the amphores with all its detail and history here, without even mentioning it in the meaningless comment “fix streets” and then you redrew a circle and tagged it with natural=water which is not what this fountain looks like. 
This is not how we operate around here, deleting and redrawing is not welcome. 

Cheers
Martin
pesec (2021-05-05 08:28:23+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы в комментариях были отражены вносимые изменения.
mavl (2021-05-05 08:45:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, lfhmz01. Ваш комментарий к этому пакету правок "ю" ничего не сообщает другим людям о том, какие изменения были сделаны. Было бы полезнее подробнее описывать сделанные изменения на карте.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
Josef73 (2023-05-13 05:05:18+00:00): Hello, can you please check the value of the tag opening_hours. It has to be in English. Please look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Thanks
Carto'Cité (2021-06-07 12:19:17+00:00): Bonjour José.

Tu as ajouté le bâtiment/toit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938117071. Or celui-ci n'est pas visible sur des images aériennes récentes comme Bing et Maxar. Je pense que la toiture mise en place fors des travaux a été enlevée en faveur du nouveau bâtiment voyageur.
 
Ton commentaire de changeset  indique "correction notes", saurais-tu retrouver la note en question (un lien vers la note aurait sa place dans le commentaire) ? Ça peut être utile de vérifier sa date et questionner son auteur.

Antoine de Carto’Cité pour #CartoTransilien
josmougn (2021-06-19 19:42:42+00:00): salut Antoine,
comme indiqué dans le changeset source=survey. Cela dit la position gps de mon téléphone n'est pas assez bonne pour bien tracer un bâtiment, en l’occurrence un grand préau tout neuf qui abrite l'accès au quai. On le devine vaguement sur cette photo : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=955219388355170.
Les notes corrigées dans ce coin ce jour-là ne concernaient pas les batiemnts, de mémoire les arrêts de bus (d'ailleurs il y a des relations à revoir par là-bas).
José
Carto'Cité (2021-06-21 07:32:12+00:00): Merci José, désolé de sous-estimer encore ton rayon d'action :-\
Antoine.
gpstracks (2021-06-27 07:32:47+00:00): Alla data del 26/06/2021 il ponte risulta chiuso da barriere New Jersey.
Fonte: sopralluogo.
felipeeugenio (2021-05-02 18:22:18+00:00): estimado. Qué es lo que está intentando mapear?
El tag que está usando está obviamente mal usado en este caso, pero puedo ayudarlo. Saludos
eggie (2021-05-02 17:49:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. bij een speeltuintje hoort nog de tag leisure=playground. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Florimondable (2021-05-09 17:48:16+00:00): Bonjour, Gambetta n'est plus en sens unique depuis quelques mois.
Je corrige.
habi (2021-09-27 06:43:06+00:00): Dieser Defi steht hier wohl kaum in der "Via Muraccio".
Sondern mitten im Feld.
Müsste wohl korrigiert werden...
chnuessli (2021-09-28 08:12:12+00:00): Da hast du Recht. Wird korrigiert.
habi (2021-09-28 08:38:45+00:00): Super, Mersi!
Carto'Cité (2021-12-30 23:48:04+00:00): Bonjour TomH77,
Je me suis permis de faire quelque modification sur les aménagements cyclables que tu as décrits autour de celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938125241. Il ne semble pas s’agir de piste cyclable à proprement parler mais c'est plutôt comparable à des voies vertes (le panneau en moins). J'ai aussi découpé pour décrire les passages piétons. N'hésite pas si tu as la moindre remarque ou question.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-02 19:38:52+00:00): "Calibration point" - you mean a surveyed geodetic control datum marker ?
Bert Araali (2021-05-03 03:37:31+00:00): No, I mean a calibrated area stored in the Imagery Offset Database (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database).  The calibration was done with multiple GPS tracks, recorded in the field and Mapillary tracks.  I didn't use Strava in this case because we had lots of GPS data. We are investigating the possible use and mapping of Geodetic markers.  The system was recently completely reinstated and updated in Uganda (I believe in 2018) however most of the markers are not visible on satellite imagery and the Offset database does not allow point data. So our local workgroup has the updated geodetic markers available from some land surveyors in our group and we need to see how we can integrate the information, probably creating accurate GPS data from the markers to some nearby buildings or better larger areas, but that is a long term process. Currently we stick with the Imagery database since most of the data in the past was added by HOTOSM teams, assuming BING as the golden standard, which it is not. So it will be a long process but we will get there, don't rush, do it once and do it good but KISS (keep it simple and...).  Important to know, but disregarded because "unknown" is that ALL satellite imagery is misalligned, especially the alignment in the Maxar imagery is of very low quality.  This causes major problems since it is the most recent and up to date. Unfortunetaly the Imagery offset database is not supported in iD, so our advise, until we have the whole country covered, is that those mappers should align with existing items or if no mapping is done in the area yet, check GPS data, if that is missing align according to Bing. Never align the map to match your imagery, that is wrong and leads to large scale damage, in doubt contact our local community through the forum or social media groups. Greetings, Bert Araali
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-03 04:21:44+00:00): Geodetic markers would be wonderful to clear imagery confusion. Bing imagery indeed has been a terrible source of offset features. At the moment, both Mapbox and ESRI imageries match GPS traces well, as far as I can tell from the Openstreetmap-recorded GPS traces available as a layer in JOSM.
Bert Araali (2021-05-03 12:25:24+00:00): Our experience is the contrary, Bing in most cases is more accurate then Maxar or Esri. Especially Maxar is troublesome, with large misalignments and semi-transparant overlaps between tiles, f.i. here, gaps between tiles, and tiles captured at different dates at different zoom levels (f.i. around Mount Elgon) !  Keep in mind that Maxar is very inaccurate when it comes to mountainous areas, with offset variations up to 15m in short range like 5km. Referencing the OSM GPS layer is good practice, the Imagery Offset Database even better.
Bert Araali (2021-05-03 12:43:24+00:00): The tea factory at first glance doesn't seem to be a mistake, on the most recent sattelite imagery it seems demolished, I assume becuase it was build on government land in the wetland.  I live only a few kilometers away from it so will go there and check one of the coming days.  I got the misalignments covered, your work is not lost although I had to revert to recover the deleted buildings and a subset reverting was not feasible.  Please stop the deletions, it is not OK in OSM, nowhere. What you call false mapping is vary rare.  You might come along misaligned or even worse non squared buildnigs, all added with good intentions by unexperienced mappers. First ask the originator to change it, assist and help to imporve the quality.  Actual buildings no longer there, like the tea factory but as I've seen most of the others you deleted should be tagged with lifecycle tags, like razed: or demolished: .  Mass deletions are vandalism, no matter the quality of what was mapped before.  Changeset comments are a good way to go, however you might get faster and better response on local forums and social media. With the changeset comments my experience is not that bad, I mostly get replies up to 50%, try to be constructive, not destructive, both in mapping practice as in language works best.  If you are interested I can send you invites for the local social media groups where you can get much more constructive discussions.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-03 21:04:07+00:00): Regarding imagery alignment, it seems that, in Kampala (situation of course varies by region - my experience in other countries is different), all current imagery is correctly aligned with GPS traces - see this quick comparison: https://imgur.com/a/xuh7cLw. Mapbox and Maxar are the same capture but Mapbox is strangely blurry, ESRI maybe half a meter offset but I think it is actually a sharpening artefact, Bing is aligned with the three others but laughingly out of date.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-03 21:08:06+00:00): Use of Bing explains a lot of the false buildings - https://imgur.com/a/xuh7cLw shows that all others have congruent current imagery but Bing shows buildings long since demolished and doesn't show newly constructed ones. Buildings traced on Bing imagery and since then demolished as attested by all other imagery sources are faire game for immediate deletion. Also, Bing imagery should be banned from current use - seeing it recommended by tasking manager coordinators is especially jarring (and they don't answer messages either).