piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:03:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:06:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. I have modified your entry. 

For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
hsc666 (2019-10-26 14:05:34+00:00): Hallo rbpa2001 und herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Was soll das sein, was Du hier eingetragen hast? Ein Objekt ohne Eigenschaften welches einen Namen trägt ist ziemlich nutzlos. Bitte sieh Dir an, wie man das Tag "name" richtig benutzt: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name>. Falls das hier eine Entfernungsmarkierung oder ein virtuellen Kilometrierungpunkt sein soll, lies bitte hier, wie man das einträgt: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway=milestone>. Und sieh Dir Beispiele an, wie andere das vor Dir bereits gemacht haben, z.B. hier <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/362821799> oder hier<https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1637632296>. 
Bitte korrigiere oder lösche Deinen Eintrag!
VG
hsc666
Frans S (2019-10-28 09:20:52+00:00): Hello Kaspergro
Thanks for mapping on this task. FYI, this task was invalidated for this reason. quote" Hello. I think we have to explain the situation here. Caused by a bug a number of tasks has been moved to the Indian Ocean. Bad luck. This cannot be undone. One of the tasks up to 2 tasks under this land tongue and on the south side of the river needs mapping> Please map them. In id editor, go lower than the task square , you will find unmapped buildings. Thanks for your assistance

You might have overlooked this. 
When you dowload the area to the south you will see  the peninsula which is hardly mapped.
Can you spend some time to map these as well?  Also the part more south on the otherside of the river need mappings
If you do, please upload your mappings frequently, so that double mappings, done by others willl be limited till a minimun. (We cannot block this part for a specific mapper)
Please let me know if you are able to do this
Thanks and best regards
SK53 (2019-10-28 17:02:02+00:00): I'd suggest using a lifecycle prefix on the climb as well as access=no.
Jojo4u (2019-10-28 17:44:17+00:00): feel free!
aharvey (2019-10-29 01:08:09+00:00): Thanks. Agreed with @SK53, I've used disused for now, once the chains have been removed can be updated to demolished or removed.
Palolo (2022-10-17 16:27:43+00:00): We appreciate the help mapping, but ask that  you please follow the instructions. We do not need landcover mapped in TDT projects. Thank you
Frans S (2021-01-06 11:13:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
A: mappings should be more precise
C: clustered buildings
E: square all rectangular buildings

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/76224197
user_5359 (2019-10-26 05:42:32+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast das Sühnekreuz https://www.osm.org/node/6376112473 um mehr als 100 Meter verschoben. War das mit Absicht und könntest Du bitte die Position prüfen?
Falls es ein Fehler war und Du Hilfe zur Korrektur bruchst, kannst Du Dich gerne hier melden.
viloan (2019-10-25 18:47:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
zuicz (2019-10-25 20:00:18+00:00): AP2 jedzie S86 i zjeżdża dopiero na węźle z Piłsudskiego ;)
olo81 (2019-10-25 23:59:42+00:00): Zrobienie tych tras trochę trwa :) 
Strasznie irytujące zajęcie, dopiero skończyłem w dwie strony :D
zuicz (2019-10-26 05:45:26+00:00): Domyślam się. Ja mogę zrobić AP4, przynajmniej się czegoś nowego nauczę ;)
olo81 (2019-10-26 16:16:06+00:00): Nawet nie wiedziałem że da się relacje robić w ID :) 
Wytrwałości!  :D
bbmiller (2019-10-26 11:56:18+00:00): Thanks for grabbing a GPS trace of the trail and making it more accurate! Looks great.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 05:17:10+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
Entschuldigung wenn ich jetzt etwas burschikos bin, aber der Import Eurer Hydrantendaten ist aber mächtig in die Hose gegangen!
Bei jedem Eintrag fehlt die Kennzeichnung für ein Hydrant (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant), bei den Schlüssel für Durchmesser und Typ habt Ihr ein Unterstrich vergessen (fire_hydrant:diameter, fire_hydrant:type statt firehydrant:diameter, firehydrant:type) und dann verwendet Ihr noch ein reservierten Schlüssel (type spezifiziert eine Relation-Art) um eine überflüssige Übersetzung von 
fire_hydrant:type aufzunehmen.
Um es kurz zu machen: Lizenztechnisch gehe ich davon aus, dass Ihr die Daten bei der Begehung der Hydranten selber gesammlet habt (sonst müssten wir wegen Lizenzproblemen löschen) und die notwendigen Korrektur habe ich unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76234059 vorgenommen.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 05:34:36+00:00): Zweiter Korrektur Schwung: /www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76234388 damit sind alle firehydrant:type verschwunden.
timi_hendrix (2019-10-25 19:15:01+00:00): ***Editing missing change set commentary*** Added way to create dual carriageway at intersection. Modified geometry on said way, and others in the periphery. Applied surface tags, name, oneway, and other necessary attributes to ways.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:12:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You also change the key building to area. Is the note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1366660 right and the building doesn't exists? But why did you add new shops?
PT-53 (2019-10-30 08:28:18+00:00): Hallo dragon8778,
es gehört bei OSM zum "Guten Ton", daß man im Änderungssatz-Kommentar angibt, kurz angibt was wo gemacht wurde.
Siehe Anschnitt 8:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Den überflüssigen P-Knoten habe ich gelöscht.
Grüße
4004 (2019-10-26 19:48:16+00:00): здравствуйте,
улицы в адресах стоит писать как на самих линия улиц - не помню как жосм, а веб редактор точно подхватывает и предлагает выбрать улицу из ближайших
Famlam (2019-10-25 19:58:47+00:00): Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76204054
Allroads (2020-03-01 18:58:22+00:00): De service wegen, op het privaat bedrijf terrein hebben niet de naam van de weg/rijbaan.
Luzandro (2019-10-26 05:00:28+00:00): Hi,

I'm not sure if this is only temporary, but currently osm-carto doesn't show the Anninger forest anymore on various zoom levels, so as you made the latest changes to the relation, maybe you could take another look
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/34891#map=15/48.0737/16.2539&layers=N
jcy (2019-10-26 18:56:29+00:00): Hi, the changes I made are in the eastern part of the forest (which renders correctly, at least for me) and are OK according to JOSM internal validator

I tried marking two tiles in the forest dirty to force rerender, they look correctly now.
mueschel (2019-10-27 14:58:20+00:00): Hi,
the tags
  recycling:collecting_raw_materials = yes
  recycling:zber_surovín = yes
are not used anywhere else and are not documented. 
Please describe what is collected here so that we can find proper tags to describe this.

Thanks!
graphic_mapper (2019-10-27 16:21:25+00:00): Hello, I’m sorry for this.

So, here is collected: 1.bulky waste(old furniture of large dimensions, sinks, baths, large carpets,etc.)
2.dangerous waste(automobile oils,oil filters,colors, sizing materials)
3.electricronic waste(TV or PC monitors,microwawes,irons)
4.biological waste from gardens and parks(mowed grass, fruit and vegetable remains, leaves)
5.clothes and textil
6.plastic(PET bottles,plastic foils,...)
7.glass(all types)
8.paper
9.metals(all types)
10.wood(smaller and larger types too)
11.little construction waste(wastes from maintenance work)

Thank you for your initiative
mueschel (2019-10-27 16:26:42+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the details!
Most of the items you can find in the list in the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

E.g. 
1. recycling:furniture
2. recycling:hazardous_waste
3. recycling:electrical_items , recycling:small_electric_appliances
4. recycling:organic
...
11. recycling:rubble

Could you have a look through the list and add the tags? Afterwards we can have a look for the tags you didn't find.
graphic_mapper (2019-10-27 17:05:04+00:00): Thank you for the link to the OSM page.I tried add tags.
mueschel (2019-10-28 22:42:17+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you found most tags. But it seems something went slightly wrong when you added the tags - some start with 'recycling:recycling:...', and some have the '=yes' inside the key. 
Could you check and fix these copy'and'paste mistakes?
graphic_mapper (2019-10-29 16:16:58+00:00): Hello, 
yes I see it. I tried fix it. Now should be it all right.
mueschel (2019-10-29 17:27:53+00:00): This looks perfect now. Thanks for the effort!
graphic_mapper (2019-10-29 17:55:23+00:00): You´re welcome.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 04:47:02+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte sei vorsichtig beim Bearbeiten der Daten. Du hast den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5616152093/history über 100 Meter verschoben, sodass es Probleme mit den zugehörigen Wegen gab. Ich habe den Knoten bereits wieder auf die Originalposition zurück versetzt.

Weiterer Hinweis: Für eine Baustelle gibt es den Wert landuse=construction.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-10-26 19:54:43+00:00): Boa noite, pode explicar a utilização da etiqueta drain nesta sua edição? 
Aguardo justificação antes de tomar outras medidas.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-10-26 21:02:34+00:00): Obrigado por ter corrigido, mas não respondeu à pergunta que lhe formulei. Uma das regras básicas do OpenStreetMap é responder às solicitações de esclarecimentos solicitados.
plennert (2020-02-28 07:43:05+00:00): Hallo, du hast den wiki Commons link an div. Orten geändert. Leider kann ich diesen nun nicht mehr als Hyperlink exportieren. Bitte mache alle Deine Änderungen rückgängig, auch wenn sie im wiki anders beschrieben sind.
pyrog (2021-03-16 08:10:15+00:00): Hallo,

Sorry for the late answer.

The full URL could be easily reconstructed:

Add simply https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ before the value :)

For example, "Category:Dorfkirche Dannenwalde (Prignitz)" will be "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dorfkirche Dannenwalde (Prignitz)"

Best regards,
Yves
Glassman (2019-10-25 21:47:47+00:00): Not sure what you were trying to accomplish. The easy method would be to just tag the existing bldg. I'm going to revert this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76228530
kapazao (2019-11-15 16:45:25+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías decirme qué referencias tomaste para realizar los cambios de vías?
Había muchos cambios de tipos de vías sin sentido y los he corregido basándome en la red de carreteras de Andalucía y el Callejero Digital de Andalucía Unificado.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76229028
c2r (2019-11-16 00:34:22+00:00): ola, estuve en Montefrío durante tres semanas de vacaciones. Pasé mucho tiempo caminando por los senderos y las pistas con mi perro. Comparo mis notas y fotografías con imágenes satelitales OSM.
Glassman (2019-10-25 21:53:40+00:00): Tip: parking can be tagged as a node, but is more effective if tagged as an polygon area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76229176
BCNorwich (2019-10-26 08:48:54+00:00): Hi,
I can see no evidence of solar panels in any imagery. Can you say how or where you have gained evidence for these panels. 
You seem to infer from your tags that the feature might be a "possible" expansion site. If the panels are not present then the should not be mapped.

Regards Bernard.
dhimmel (2023-10-24 23:32:01+00:00): Also stumbled upon this "solar" node and was a bit confused as to what it was supposed to indicate.

I think @YASHPERDDD might have been confused about the purpose of OSM and was using to take notes on potential installation sites for Hanover Solar... hmm.
BCNorwich (2023-10-25 06:16:34+00:00): All the others are removed so I've now removed this one. Thanks for the nudge.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:22:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a campsite or a shop for camping cars? I have problems to open the website from my country.
R&D (2019-10-26 17:48:14+00:00): A shop for vehicles, new and used, Parts & Repairs. Liquid Propane, Dump your holding tanks, power 50 amp. to check system and grab a little charge. Friendly.
mueschel (2020-01-11 18:20:35+00:00): Please check this way, you added a 'Calle' tag there:
http://osm.org/way/544265689
Øukasz (2020-07-03 12:51:54+00:00): Hi Jules, 

Thanks for your contribution. This edit could improved somewhat - for example the buildings and residential areas could be traced more precisely. Do you think you could fix this? Thanks!
andrewwiseman (2019-11-19 21:42:03+00:00): Thanks for mapping. When mapping bridges, make sure to use the existing road, don't add a new one on top of it. Here's more https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64873
Timmy_Tesseract (2019-11-27 19:51:38+00:00): That's indeed how bridges should be mapped. Did I accidentally create one differently in this changeset?
Glassman (2019-10-26 00:02:16+00:00): Question - I noticed you removed what looks like car shelters. Don't they exist any more?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76230236
Glassman (2019-10-26 00:03:23+00:00): Tip: to tag an area as an apartment complex create an area/polygon around the complex tagging it as landuse=residential + name=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76230236
S-zation (2019-11-03 22:12:21+00:00): Hi,
Don't move things such as underground pipelines just because you think they shouldn't be there. Underground pipeline markers on Street Road and Emma Lane show that the pipeline passes under the golf course.
freebeer (2019-11-09 08:24:04+00:00): based on the visualisation offered by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76230264 (zoom in to the area of activity as this covers the whole pipeline segment), this looks not dissimilar to another golf mapper who repeatedly distorted and shoved to the side various features in the vicinity of a different golf course(s), as well as deleting nearby features outright.

it should be made clear that osm is a map of the real world, and not a playground that can be manipulated for the self-interest needs of some golf course game or pokémon go or whatever, and if these other uses cannot ignore the reality that appears to corrupt the pristine golf courses, they need to be fixed to adhere to osm standards, rather than falsifying osm data.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 04:25:17+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte füge keine privaten Informationen von Mietern oder Eigentümer zu einem Wohngebäude hinzu.
opendcc (2019-10-26 08:06:21+00:00): Hallo,

auch wenn die Oberfläche wassergebunden ist, so ist das doch eine unclasssified, weil Gemeindeverbindungsstraße. Track ist primär für landwirtschaftliche Nutzung.

Viele Grüße

Wolfgang
ka18697 (2019-10-26 17:43:57+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, was meinst Du  mit "wassergebunden"? Ich kann nur sagen, dass der Abschnitt vn Riegelsberg nach Unterthalham ein echt grober Feldweg ist. 
Mir wäre die Kenntnis über  die Beschaffenheit der Oberfläche wichtiger als die Klassifizierung. Aber kann man bei "unclassified" irgendwie die schlechte Oberfläche kenntlich machen? "Kies" sagt das einfach nicht aus....
Gruß
Andreas
opendcc (2019-10-26 19:29:03+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

klar, wir Radler sind eher an der Oberfläche interessiert, nicht an irgendwelchen Fahrzeugbeschränkungen ;-). Trotzdem: bei der Einstufung geht es nach 'wer darf da fahren, für welchen Zweck ist diese Straße' und nicht nach Oberfläche. 

Es gibt einen Tag 'smoothness', hier kannst Du z.B. bad oder horrible eintragen. Und gute Rad-Navis werten das aus.

Servus Wolfgang
Carnildo (2019-10-27 05:46:18+00:00): Are you sure you put Ron's Food Mart in the correct place?  In the aerial imagery, the building you mapped looks like a gas station, with the convenience store being in the next building to the west.
ohnowhyamihere (2019-10-25 22:41:33+00:00): Yay, my 100th edit!
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:26:08+00:00): Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?

see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dplumber
user_5359 (2019-10-26 07:27:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
viloan (2019-10-25 22:49:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Trevor_1 (2019-10-25 23:00:24+00:00): Hi, please stop changing the classification of every major road to "motorway" or "autopista". It can be considered vandalism and you could get suspended.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-28 11:59:15+00:00): @1T-money - it's clear from the changeset discussion comments and comments elsewhere that a number of this user's edits need to be reverted.  Are there any from the last couple of months or so that are actually valid and worth keeping?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Trevor_1 (2019-11-28 15:31:58+00:00): @SomeoneElse I don't think so. I haven't looked at all of his edits but I changed some of the highways back to trunk or whatever else they were before. I don't know how to undo other people's edits
SomeoneElse (2019-11-29 00:06:28+00:00): > I don't know how to undo other people's edits

No problem - that's why I was asking.  Someone else mentioned (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75116249 ) that the edits in the US seem to be mostly OK.
If there are any others that you can see that are obviously wrong then you can either comment on the changeset directly or alternatively email the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Trevor_1 (2019-11-29 03:04:04+00:00): @SomeoneElse Ok thanks!
eggie (2019-10-26 06:37:29+00:00): Dag MOnrust,
Mocht je tijd er voor overhebben dan kun je al die "niet doorgaande straten" een keer omtaggen van unclassified naar residential. Dat staat in veel plaatsen nog "verkeerd" sinds een import vanuit Kaartenmaker AND.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-10-26 04:20:54+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte vesrtehe die Kommentierung als Anregung nicht als Kritik. 

Schau Dir mal die Enden der AvW-Straße (die Du neu gezeichnet hast) und der FR-Straße an. M.E. sehe ich in den Mapbox und ESRI Luftbilderne, dass nur die FR Straße einen Wendehammer hat. Der Punkt für den Wendehammer der FR-Straße ist historisch (vor sechs Jahren) bis zum Ende der Straße gezogen worden und nicht bis zur Mitte des Wendehammers. Aber das ist definitiv Feintuning und nicht nötig.
denumon (2019-10-29 11:47:08+00:00): Hi, danke dir für den Hinweis!
Entschuldige, das ich erst jetzt sehe das du geschrieben hast, das ist alles noch etwas verwirrend hier (für mich). :-)
Ich bin vor Ort, da fiel mir nur das fehlen der Straße AvW auf.
Du hast Recht: am („neuen“) Ende der AvW ist eher „Platz zum Wenden in einer Sackgasse“, als ein echter Wendehammer.
Wie würdest du das Mappen?
Ich habe mich (weil noch recht unerfahren) an vorhandenen Straßen und Gepflogenheiten orientieren wollen, lerne aber gerne dazu. :-)
user_5359 (2019-10-30 07:02:14+00:00): Hallo, ich würde einfach am Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6917134479 das Tag highway=turning_circle löschen.
denumon (2019-10-30 21:47:59+00:00): Klasse. Danke dir für den Hinweis und den konstruktiven Tipp!
user_5359 (2019-10-26 06:47:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question:Is this a business or a private phone number:
Hint: Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Glassman (2019-10-26 18:32:00+00:00): I went ahead and reverted this changeset for having private info.
viloan (2019-10-25 23:47:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!