piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-06-24 07:46:52+00:00): De Loverstraat zou al niet kunnen routeren, want er staat een hek aan de kant van de Visstraat met access=no erop. 
Of moped en mofa yes daar klopt. Zal er eens een keer kijken . 
Volgens mij is het stukje Begijnstraat tegenwoordig voetgangersgebied. 
highway=pedestrian. 

oneway=yes op de Engelenburgerbrug is tijdelijk ivm de renovatie van de oude brug. 
Er ligt een noodbrug vlak ernaast. 
Voor tweewielers geldt de eenrichting niet.  Ik had het even zo gelaten omdat er routerelaties voor fietsers en wandelaars lopen.
De uitzonderingen voor tweewieles voeg ik even toe. Het routeert nu allemaal niet meer. 

Wat gaat er fout in de routering?


Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106876609

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-24 08:05:42+00:00): oneway=yes heb ik verwijderd  en de volgende  accesstag  toegevoegd
access=conditional=no @ (2020 Jan 01-2021 Oct 01)

Dit omdat anders de fiets- en wandelroutes foutmeldingen gaan geven. 
De noodbrug heb ik ingetekend. Rendering duurt even.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-25 06:12:55+00:00): De Engelenburgerbrug heb ik er uit gehaald en de wandelroutes omgelegd. De planning is nu al voorjaar 2022. Dat duurt te lang voor conditionaltagging. 
oneway=yes staat op de noodbrug muv fietsverkeer.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-06-24 08:29:54+00:00): Beste CRJ2  Waarom een relatie van de op de Amstel..  ?
eggie (2021-06-24 08:30:51+00:00): Typo.. Waarom heb je een relatie gemaakt van de waterwaydelen op de Amstel.. Zomaar even nieuwsgierig?
MVG
eggie
CRJ2 (2021-06-24 08:35:29+00:00): Beste Eggie,

vrijwel alle grote rivieren hebben er eentje (zie bijv.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12233572, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2741748 ). De Amstel miste er nog één. Handig als je in één oogopslag de gehele rivier wil weergeven.

Groetjes, CRJ2
balint36 (2021-06-28 22:34:40+00:00): Szia! Szokolya állomás a 3-as számú váltóját már kiszedték, ezért a te változtatásod helytelen.
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 01:02:58+00:00): Why did you remove the street name from this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4727782200 in this changeset you made?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106877513
user_11585484 (2021-06-25 05:11:52+00:00): I actually don't remember, I did a lot of edits yesterday.
I just looked around, and it seems there is a street around it with an inappropriate name(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4255781#map=18/33.29101/44.41764) so I probably thought it was vandalism
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106877513
user_11585484 (2021-06-25 05:15:11+00:00): yes I remembered, it was a swear word "العرصات" which roughly translates to "sons of bitches"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106877513
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 12:54:25+00:00): “العرصات" is the official name of the street. If you’re not familiar with names in Iraq you should’ve leave it to locals. Things in your language doesn’t mean the same things in other languages. Please google the word “شارع العرصات" to learn more. And revert the deletion you’ve done. Thank you..
user_11585484 (2021-06-26 06:31:32+00:00): Ah my bad then, I will revert the changes now
eggie (2021-06-24 07:23:47+00:00): Beste Tvdb

Het lijkt me allemaal niet correct.
Wanneer je motor_vehicle=designated gaat taggen op wegen dan gaat het routeren voor regulier verkeer.
Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Er staan geen pollers meer in het gebied. Er is tegenwoordig camaratoezicht bij de doorgangen.
Ik heb al meer advies gegeven om dat conditionaltagging te gebruiken voor de uitzonderingen die hier wel mogen komen. Niet alles open gaan zetten voor HVC. Dan staat het ook open voor iedereen met een motorvoertuig.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

De tijden van openstelling van het gebied veranderen hier doorlopend. 
Verder ligt het gebied tijdelijk overhoop en is tijdelijk  eenrichting ingesteld ivm de renovatie van de Engelerburgerbrug. Ook zijn tijden aangepast ivm met de uitstalling van de terrassen ivm Corona. Misschien ook weer achterhaald. 
Zie info Gemeente Dordrecht. 
motor_vehicle=designated haal ik weer weg hier.
Voorbeelden hoe zoiets te taggen
motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 06:00-12:00; Su 07:00-13:00) 

of iets met permit??

Zie zo ook even niet de oplossing.
Leg je vraag even op het forum neer.
Wellicht iets met motor_vehicle=destination hier?
Welk bord staat vooraan in de Nieuwstraat.
Waarom op de Singel turn=right
Dat is geen valide tag. 
Wat wil je daar mee bereiken?
Aan het eind van de Singel mag je alleen richting Station. Een router zal je niet rechtdoor sturen. 


http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106877538

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-24 08:23:21+00:00): In de nieuwstraat heb ik omgetagd motor_vehicle=designated naar destination.
turn=right heb ik van de Singel verwijderd. Dat is geen valide tag.
Wat gaat hier fout?
De oversteek van Albert Cuypsingel naar Nicolaas Maessingel is niet meer mogelijk sinds het voorjaar behalve voor tweewielers.
De afslag gaat automatisch richting Station.
Bij een verouderde router zal het wellicht nog fout gaan. 
In OSM staat het correct.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2021-06-25 16:30:28+00:00): It looks like you created a building within another building. What many of us do is just use nodes for each unique address in a building. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106878029
eraoul (2021-06-25 20:27:38+00:00): Thanks -- I've fixed this, hopefully I created the address "point" correctly. Let me know if I need to do anything differently.
Glassman (2021-06-25 21:13:01+00:00): Much better. I went ahead and copied the building address to another node and removed the address from the building. Now when someone wants to add a business, they can just add the information to the nodes.
eraoul (2021-06-25 21:27:33+00:00): Actually this building has multiple addresses. It's rather bizarre: each of the 3 residential units has a unique street address as well as an additional, redundant "unit number". So there is no "building address" -- it has a building number ("A") but that's all.
eraoul (2021-06-25 21:27:59+00:00): And to be clear, it's only residential -- no businesses here.
Glassman (2021-06-25 21:41:55+00:00): That does sound bizarre. According to King County iMap, https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/ each unit has just a distinct address. I made a change to the building, adding a name "Building A" and removing the unit number. Let me know if that sounds right. Is there a name for the condo complex? You could create a landuse polygon (area) around the buildings and add the name of the condo to it.
maro21 (2024-01-21 11:57:15+00:00): https://osm.org/node/3454275630 - to będzie shop=nutrition_supplements
starsep (2024-01-21 12:00:07+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-06-24 08:34:38+00:00): Dag Edwin.. 1x access=private voldoet..
De verschillende categorieën hoef je niet te noemen.
Kwaad kan het niet. 

MVG
eggie
Edwin's OSM (2021-06-24 08:54:20+00:00): Ik had eerst alle categorieën apart aangeklikt en toen zag ik dat ik de algemene had overgeslagen...
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
L'imaginaire (2021-06-24 10:52:20+00:00): Juist, had de OSM-reflex nog niet gemaakt. Vorige week nog met iemand van de BKO staan praten, hij zei dat het definitief zou zijn.
user_11435438 (2021-06-29 03:16:23+00:00): Hello. The railway you changed in China is narrow gauge railway, and it has already been disused, so plz do not tag it as railway=rail.
badenk (2021-06-29 04:44:06+00:00): Hi  Jyunhou:

Perhaps you could be more specific.  I checked all six ways, and I left them all with  "disused:railway 	narrow_gauge" and "railway 	disused".

thanks,
Baden
badenk (2021-06-29 05:59:11+00:00): OK, I see now:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957772589#map=13/23.4925/103.3608&layers=T

What do you base your assertion on?  I see on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caoba%E2%80%93Guanjiashan_railway

"Thus the Caoguan-Yuguopo section of the Caoguan line became a connector between Yunnan's century old metre-gauge Kunming–Hekou line and the new standard-gauge Kunming–Yuxi–Hekou railway."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caoba%E2%80%93Guanjiashan_railway

All the latest imagery displays a well maintained railway.

https://www.google.com/maps/@23.5178468,103.4071863,131m/data=!3m1!1e3

https://www.google.com/maps/@23.4675618,103.3225373,131m/data=!3m1!1e3

Much of these narrow gauge lines look like they are still maintained.  (Google Earth 2021-03) 

thanks,
Baden
user_11435438 (2021-07-02 01:51:01+00:00): Hello.
OK, maybe it is indeed in use. Actually, the point I want to say is, it's narrow gauge railway, instead of standard gauge railway, so assuming it is in use, it should be tagged as railway=narrow_gauge instead of railway=rail. But it does not matter, it has been changed.
Thank you for your serious attitude, enjoy mapping!
badenk (2021-07-03 19:58:57+00:00): Hi Jyunhou:

You are correct.
thanks,
Baden
Supaplex (2021-06-24 09:46:15+00:00): 二聖醫院的建築應該仍在吧？如果仍在只需要把醫院相關的標籤，依照life cycle方式處理
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106882533
Supaplex (2021-06-24 09:42:12+00:00): amenity=parking, parking=underground, layer=-1
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106882750
SafetyIng (2021-06-24 13:17:36+00:00): 957781176 , 957781172 and 957781171 are driveways......
priymose (2021-06-28 14:06:39+00:00): Hi,Apologies for the misinterpretation. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion. Regards, priymose
theophrastos (2021-06-24 08:13:10+00:00): Falscher Kommentar: sollte sein
"A 81 AS BB-Ost Veränderungen in der Baustelle"
itineris (2022-02-18 21:07:01+00:00): Szia!

oneway=-1-et nem használunk. Inkább megfordítjuk a vonal irányát, és akkor lehet belőle rendes egyirányút csinálni.

Köszönöm:
Ákos
Warin61 (2023-03-18 04:59:06+00:00): Hi,

The Mosque ... 
Way: 957793571 building:part=yes ... umm would that not be part of the roof? If so building:part=roof? And also the location would be in the center of the building?
habi (2021-06-24 08:36:11+00:00): Laut WIKI, 💩-Autocorrect.
Max-Kritic (2021-07-01 14:35:07+00:00): Beaucoup de fautes. Voir http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=18&lat=50.010743&lon=4.047549&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3
Supaplex (2021-06-24 10:00:59+00:00): 請問為何移除原先繪製的人行道呢?是否已經消失了?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106885530
mbertheau (2021-06-24 12:57:49+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Fu.C3.9Fweg (sorry, this info is not on the english version) a sidewalk that is right next to a road, where you can step on the road at any time shouldn't be mapped separately, but instead the road should get sidewalk=left/right/both.

And on the southern edge of the park there's no sidewalk, just the other path that is still there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106885530
Geim (2021-07-30 07:01:29+00:00): Waarom heb je van het Noordbargerbos een park gemaakt? Volgens wiki is een park het volgende: "A park is an area of open space for recreational use,"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
martiensch (2021-08-02 09:58:47+00:00): Hoi Geim,

Ik ben aan de slag gegaan met het toevoegen van bossen in Groningen en Drenthe. Ik kwam eerst eens op park uit. Nature_reserve is misschien beter. Ik weet niet wat er nou zo beschermenswaardig aan is, maar het maakt mij niet uit.
Vinber-Pro (2021-06-24 11:21:57+00:00): Attention, tu travailles sur de grandes étendues, seulement pour 2 modifs mineures, cela peut faire du brouillage pour les gens qui suivent :).
j'ai tendance à séparer en 2 changesets différents pour éviter que cela soit trop large.
My2cents :)
DDROMAGNY (2021-06-24 12:29:41+00:00): Bonjour Hélène, 
Est ce normal que la borne soit placée sur le bâtiment ? 
Il s'agit bien d'une borne tactile dinformations touristiques ? 
Delphine du CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106886446
Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (2021-06-24 12:47:10+00:00): Bonjour Delphine,
Oui le meuble est bien situé dans le bâtiment avec de la documentation touristique et une tablette consultable avec des infos touristiques également ;-)
DDROMAGNY (2021-06-24 12:57:06+00:00): D'accord, merci  Hélène !
cquest (2021-07-06 05:43:02+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !

J'ai fait deux petites corrections: il n'y a pas de double-sens cyclable sur cette voie, juste une bande réservée aux cyclistes mais dans le même sens de circulation que les voitures.

(J'habite juste à côté).
Bonnes contributions !
ToniE (2021-08-31 12:20:39+00:00): Hi Rumola,

ist der Alte Molkereiweg  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8076940
wirklich eine Einbahnstraße?

Hier fahren einige Buslinien in beide Richtungen durch.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
Rumola (2021-09-01 12:11:11+00:00): Hallo Toni,
da ist mir vermutlich ein Fehler passiert. Danke für den Hinweis...hab es soeben korrigiert.
Viele Grüße,
Daniel
Kovoschiz (2021-06-24 17:53:58+00:00): Thank you but please don't remove the address and perimeter as they won't really change.
os-emmer (2024-02-24 20:34:08+00:00): Hi bob3bob3,
you added/edited a lot of emergency=ses_station's in Queensland and New South Wales. A lot of them do not include an operator or name. Are all the stations located in Queensland operated by the Queensland SES and the ones in NSW by the New South Wales SES?
Do they all match the recently approved emergency=disaster_response?

I was able to find these relevant Stations:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1HMJ

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
bob3bob3 (2024-02-24 21:43:12+00:00): Hello, I have seen some of your posts re the intended mechanical/mass change over this.

Yes they will all be the relevant state operator (NSW/Qld). If I was unable to read a name on a sign reliably (Mapillary photo or in person) then I left it blank.

I cant vouch for whether they all meet the emergency=disaster_response criteria, but a very high proportion will. Most being a meeting point and storage depot for vehicles/equipment. My input has basically relied on recognising a "well known" sign branding scheme rather than reading the location's function. I suspect though that given the positive outcome of this change a few mistakes will be acceptable. Indeed it may be worthwhile checking if there is a data use waiver to allow a cross check and naming update as part of or after the change.

Cheers
os-emmer (2024-02-25 14:23:52+00:00): My mass edit proposal is limited to objects tagged with "SES" or "State Emergency Service" in the name=* or operator=*. So a station like this would not be part of the mass edit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9863096866

As far as I know there are only a few office headquarters like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138390187
But as thes should never have been tagged emergency=ses_station, it will not cause damage to change emergency=ses_station to emergency=disaster_response.

If that is ok for you I will change these objects from emergency=ses_station to emergency=disaster_response:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1HNK

They where all lastly edited by you, tagged with emergency=ses_station and do not include "SES" or "State Emergency Service" in the name=* or operator=*.
bob3bob3 (2024-02-25 19:30:36+00:00): Understood, yes it is okay by me if you change any objects emergency=ses_station last edited by me to emergency=disaster_response. If you wish to add any of the (missing) default state operator and wikidata tags as well, please do.
os-emmer (2024-02-26 17:15:48+00:00): I just changed the objects from emergency=ses_station to emergency=disaster_response and added the operator=* and operator:wikidata=* tags. Thank you a lot for your support.
ivanbranco (2021-06-26 17:40:47+00:00): Hi Arya, the correct tag is ref, not ref_id (that has only 8 uses). Can you fix it?
st_roller (2021-06-24 18:34:46+00:00): Nu ik achter een echte computer zit denk ik dat, gezien de voorgeschiedenis van deze node, de brievenbus gewoon verwijderd is en de prive brievenbussen toevallig in de buurt stonden.
Leo Slager (2021-06-24 20:26:59+00:00): Ja, dat is waarschijnlijk wel een juiste aanname.
Als je de node wilt verwijderen, ga dan je gang.
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 00:41:08+00:00): STOP ADDING SPAM!!!!
Jakka (2021-06-25 07:03:34+00:00): You add the shop on the shape of the hole building. That is not correct. The building contains other shops ? en apartments. Beter adding Media markt on sigle node ....
trial (2021-06-28 20:44:48+00:00): Je crois qu'une bonne correction du multi-polygone sera de faire plusieurs polygones car le résidentiel discontinu ça ne fait que compliquer.
trial (2025-11-17 15:12:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12883500, Parc d'Activité Armor Océan semble être un nom alternatif, Cf. https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/70204275500513 et https://www.cgi.com/france/fr-fr/recrute/lorient
gurglypipe (2021-06-24 11:41:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits around Keswick. I’ve reverted this one because the operator is already tagged on the pipeline relation, which this way is part of. :)
CjMalone (2021-06-29 15:09:02+00:00): Thank you
bielebog (2021-06-24 16:24:44+00:00): Also der Brückenbelag (die ist ja nun leicht derangiert ;-) ist nach meinem Augenschein eher kein Asphalt, sondern sieht doch eher nach aufgerautem Beton aus.
Carto'Cité (2021-12-30 13:13:58+00:00): Salut iovid,
Je crois que la bande est de l'autre côté (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=218297776464970). Je corrige dans ce sens ;) Si elle a changé de côté excuse-moi, dis-le moi et je corrigerai.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
iovid (2022-01-02 09:48:15+00:00): Salut,

Effectivement petite coquille de ma part. Merci de ta vigilance, et bonne année !
Carto'Cité (2022-01-06 14:29:53+00:00): Merci pour ton retour :)
À bientôt.
Charles
radiotrefoil (2021-06-25 13:59:57+00:00): Amazing work in Oberon and Mudgee. Apologies for the late notice but I'll be speaking briefly on Radio Blue Mountains 89.1 FM about the mapping effort tomorrow around 2:30pm. Let me know if you would like me to say anything on your behalf.
John Bek (2021-06-25 21:57:58+00:00): Thanks mate, I guess when I spend time in these places and see how "unmapped" they previously were, I can't help but make them more visible and user-friendly
Warin61 (2026-03-04 03:54:59+00:00): Hi,
Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)...

This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT

Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/ 

Maybe it is 'used ' for both ???
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
Larmax (2021-06-26 09:02:31+00:00): Hei, miksi siirrät jatkuvasti rakennuksia vääriin paikkoihin? Maxarin ilmakuvathan heittävät usealla metrillä. Palautan muutokset aiempaan, kun esimerkiksi vesitorni on jo kerran jäljiltäsi korjattu.
maraf24 (2021-07-16 11:57:03+00:00): Po co ta zmiana? Na nazwę oficjalną jest osobny tag.
q_un_go (2022-01-01 14:52:42+00:00): Die B31 zwischen Meersburg und Uhldingen ist Kraftfahrstraße und in einem Teilabschnitt zwischen zwei kreuzungsfreien Anschlüssen auch baulich getrennt zweistreifig je Richtung. Das erfüllt die Kriterien für einen Trunk, zumal es ja eine Kraftfahrstraße ist, im vierstreifigen Abschnitt, wenn man die Definition von "Trunk" nicht extrem eng fasst. 
(Trunk: Kraftfahrstraße und Minimum 2+1-System als eine mögliche Minimalanfordung ist gegeben).
mcliquid (2022-01-01 17:33:17+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,

vielen Dank für die tolle Erklärung. Ich weiß aber gar nicht, weshalb ich diese verdient habe. Ich habe lediglich das surface Tag bei dieser Straße ergänzt. Viele Grüße
Luzandro (2021-06-26 05:14:48+00:00): Hallo,

die Zufahrt kann keine Einbahn sein, sonst würde man nie wieder von dort heraus kommen.

das allgemeine access=private wird im Grunde genommen auch wieder aufgehoben, wenn du gleichzeitig mit den spezifischeren bicycle, foot und motor_vehicle den Zugang für so gut wie alle Verkehrstypen wieder auf yes setzt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access?uselang=de
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106896716
limes11 (2025-03-01 12:43:17+00:00): Moin,

du hattest hier die zwei Flächen des NSGs zusammengelegt. Die Kontur dieses NSGs ist allerdings auf der LANUV-Seite völlig anders:

https://nsg.naturschutzinformationen.nrw.de/nsg/de/fachinfo/gebiete/gesamt/PB_061

Das Gebiet ist um ein Vielfaches kleiner als hier verzeichnet (lediglich 19 ha)

Gibt es andere Quellen, die den hier markierten Verlauf belegen ?

Danke
angys (2021-06-25 02:40:46+00:00): Hello, English name can add at the name:en field
Dimacn (2021-06-28 05:37:47+00:00): Дубли адресов:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278312756/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828726534/history

И ещё из прошлых правок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278175290/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278189005/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278175588/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278189427/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278175376/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278205191/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307282/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307196/history

Название улицы неправильное:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307059
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307230
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278307279
user_5359 (2021-06-25 06:00:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.

I have correct this.
Josef73 (2022-03-18 20:05:52+00:00): Hello, is this shop: FixieSG Bedok (8863052810, v1) also open on Saturday and Sunday?
thopf (2021-06-27 14:03:10+00:00): Alpha-Cube ist schon seit mehreren Monaten in Bau. Das Fundament und das Kellergeschoss ist bereits fertig. Siehe Webcam: https://smartcitygraz.it-wms.com/
trapicki (2021-06-28 18:20:03+00:00): Völlig richtig, hab das heute dann auch gemerkt. Danke für den Hinweis.
Rapp GIS Bjørn L Rapp (2023-01-03 13:04:50+00:00): Hei! Jeg kan ikke se noe forbudskilt ved Amlund bru, hverken fra sørsiden eller nordsiden på Vegvesenet sine veibilder fra i år. Er det faktisk satt inn forbud for gående her, eller er det «bare» farlig og upraktisk?
kao (2023-01-03 13:14:27+00:00): Hei! Det er ikke noe forbudsskilt. Jeg jobber i Innlandstrafikk, og vi har fått reaksjoner fra kommunen på at reisesøk fra Mjøsparken hos Entur ga reiseforslag som innebar gange over denne brua, som mildt sagt er lite fotgjengervennlig. Gange bør skje i GS-nettet som går parallelt, men som jo er lengre i avstand, og som derfor ikke blir foreslått hos Entur. Jeg er klar over at dette er en "dirty" quickfix, som ikke er ideell.