piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-01-15 10:37:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

amenity=drinking_water was juist correct. Die tag heb je verwijderd.
Waarom?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-15 13:43:36+00:00): amenity=drinking_water toegevoegd. Zal straks wel weer renderen
gr eggie
RicoElectrico (2022-01-16 20:48:23+00:00): Poprawiłem trochę tę edycję, przeniosłem opis do description. Przywróciłem oznaczenie budynku.
impuls1994 (2022-01-16 21:13:55+00:00): Niestety zmiana nie jest do końca poprawna, nazwa sklepu to "Sklep Balon" a nie sam wyraz Balon 
tu można zobaczyć instagram właściciela i logo sklepu, proszę o poprawę
impuls1994 (2022-01-16 21:14:19+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/jacekjackowskii/
RicoElectrico (2022-01-16 23:31:45+00:00): Hej, przy zmianie kierowałem się tym: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy

Wiadomo, każda reguła to tylko wskazówka, jeśli chcesz, to zmień na "Sklep Balon" i nie będzie problemu.
NorthCrab (2023-02-05 08:37:06+00:00): Co to za atrakcja turystyczna "Ogród"?
iriman (2022-01-15 16:04:48+00:00): Hi ALu68,
I changed this building back to previous state with some minor modifications. 

There was two major problems with this edit: 1- changing building=* to building:part=*, it prevents building from being rendered on 2D renderers like this website. 2- That multipolygon is actually the outer edge of the roof.

Here is a rough 3D rendering of this building (It isn't updated yet to reflect your edit):
https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=34.09774&lon=49.70916&zoom=20.0&tilt=45&rotation=-202

Regards
ALu68 (2022-01-15 22:11:25+00:00): Hello iriman, the building should have one open part in the middle? Like this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1587727 https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=48.37712&lon=10.88655&zoom=19.6&tilt=45&rotation=0

Or other specific features?

Regards. Andre
iriman (2022-01-16 09:48:58+00:00): Hello Andre, thanks for your attention.
A month ago, the building was under construction and that area is the main field for zurkhaneh sport, so I guess that middle part will have a roof at the end. However I should find some more photos to know how it looks finally. 

Here, two photos of the construction:

http://www.arak.ir/Portals/0/uploads/photo_2021-11-18_08-22-00.jpg365.jpg
http://www.arak.ir/Portals/0/uploads/photo_2021-06-23_13-03-00.jpg304.jpg

Regards
iriman (2022-10-30 21:27:28+00:00): Hi Andre, 
This sport center is finished now. There are some photos at these links for the opening day:

https://cdn.yjc.news/files/fa/news/1401/8/4/16782065_898.jpg
https://www.borna.news/fa/tiny/news-1390741
https://www.mehrnews.com/photo/5617156/
user_5239402 (2022-01-15 10:49:37+00:00): http://www.1gan.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=202083 이 기사에 따르면 배선도가 나와 있으며 유치선은 공사나 보수 시 자제운반을 하기 위해 임시로 설치하는 철로이고 운반시설인 일종의 모터카를 보관하기 위한 장소라서 진접선과 연결되는 철도입니다.
AlexRiabtsev (2022-01-17 04:41:59+00:00): Будь ласка, поверни ліхтарі на місце.
muchichka_s (2022-01-17 08:20:32+00:00): Ти про що? Всі ці точки, що видалені, додані 2 дні до реверту, як клони сусідніх точок. Хочеш, щоб замість кожного ліхтаря було по 2?
AlexRiabtsev (2022-01-18 08:15:25+00:00): Ок, якщо дублі, то все норм. Бо є народ, що любить зносити ліхтарі, то ч трохи нервую 😉
muchichka_s (2022-01-19 15:56:25+00:00): Все нормально. Будь-який набір змін, де додано або видалено багато елементів треба перевіряти, незалежно від того, хто його зробив. Просто цей реверт треба було зробити швидко, поки ці точки не почали змінювати, і не почалися конфлікти даних
AlexRiabtsev (2022-01-19 16:09:40+00:00): стараюсь ;) дякую, що слідкуєш!
Temat-Droga (2022-01-15 11:50:00+00:00): Droga nie łączy dużych miast
szalona_entropia (2022-01-15 15:11:11+00:00): Leszno i Cottbus są dużymi miastami
Temat-Droga (2022-01-15 18:33:27+00:00): No Leszno to tak niezbyt bym powiedział ale jak tam uważasz. Do Cottbus dociera A18 z Wrocławia i Legnicy czyli z głównych połączeń jak dla mnie. A po za tym nie powiedziałem że degraduje droge Głogów-Leszno
Temat-Droga (2022-01-15 11:59:14+00:00): No ale po co mają się narażać?
Ogólnie to przestań wycofywać też edycje odrazu tylko napisz post na forum tam masz ze mną kontakt lub też discord czy wiadomości osm
szalona_entropia (2022-01-15 15:12:03+00:00): Jak nie ja, to ktoś inny będzie wycofywał takie edycje, masz to jak w banku.
dvdhoven (2022-01-15 11:46:11+00:00): Ommetje Loil is een lokaal netwerkje.
Het is dan ook lwn geen rwn, anders komen er problemen met het "echte" netwerk, het wandelnetwerk Achterhoek.
Dus geen rwn_ref maar lwn_ref
Namen van knooppunten worden altijd als xxx:name getagged, xxx is in dit geval lwn Dus lwn:name=

Knooppunten en routes moeten altijd in een netwerk worden opgenomen.
Ik heb het netwerk Ommetje Loil gemaakt en daar de knopen lid van gemaakt.
In knooppuntnet.nl kun je dat netwerkje bekijken https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/network/13666554

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
aceman444 (2023-05-26 21:29:24+00:00): Zdravim, zase zmeny bez uvedenia zdroja?
A tu poznamku na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5126000523 ste si evidentne nevsimli. Ako vysvetlite odlisny nazov na tabuli nez co ste zadali?
Lokai (2022-06-05 10:50:50+00:00): Hallo,

mit wikidata habe ich mich bisher nicht befasst.

Was bedeutet bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7425215785#map=19/49.73022/8.03858&layers=D und ein weiterer,
die sculptur und der Zusammenhang mit der Birne?

Gruß

L.
Cedcou (2022-01-15 11:41:09+00:00): Erreur... 
Je n'arrive pas à supprimer ma modification
StefanHRT (2022-01-15 12:14:52+00:00): Hallo, Sorry aber der Radweg ist dort nur eine Fahrspur und an der Straße richtig getaggt. habe Deinen Cycleway wieder entfernt. beim crossing habe ich Ergänzungen vorgenommen. VG
jeslop (2022-01-15 15:17:27+00:00): Hola V1LLORA. ¿Puedes decirnos de donde proceden tus datos? En las imágenes de PNOA (que dices utilizar como fuente) es imposible distinguir, por ejemplo, si hay cinco restaurantes en la Plaza Mayor. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad

Quedo a la espera,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
kartonage (2022-02-09 11:13:49+00:00): Hej,

als Info für dich, weil du das hier in der Gegend öfter gemacht hast:

Beschreibende Zusätze im Namen bitte nicht setzen. Der Name soll nur der Name sein und nicht "Name (Funktion)".

Danke
joculari (2022-02-09 11:32:59+00:00): Danke für die Info. Ich hatte das an anderer Stelle so gesehen und dachte das macht man so.
PedroMTG13 (2022-01-15 21:50:11+00:00): Boas sabes me confirmar se esta rua, na outra extremidade, junto ao Marques também só tem 1 sentido, + 1 para bus.
filipetdf (2022-01-17 14:23:03+00:00): Sim, tens razão. Vou actualizar a rua toda.
filipetdf (2022-01-17 14:34:25+00:00): Actualizado.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116257226
Austrianton (2022-01-15 16:18:15+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reparatur.

Da scheint mir was, beim Versuch es zu reparieren, schief gelaufen zu sein.
eggie (2022-01-15 13:37:01+00:00): Netje gedaan...en met josm!
Even 'ter leering ende vermaeck"
Alle gebouwen in OSM zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster. Je kunt in het vervolg  via het draadje Verzoek BAG import om herimport vragen bij (ver) -nieuwbouw
Er wrden geen gebouwen zelf ingetekend. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
De Aldi-info heb samengevoegd met de adresnode. 
In JOSM kun je ook de BAG en/of de BGT omtrekgericht als achtergrond zetten. 
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Groet,
eggie
MapMan420 (2022-01-15 14:19:44+00:00): Bedankt voor de info, de BGT overlay ziet er heel handig uit
syntex (2023-09-29 13:18:22+00:00): ulica Lawendowa i większa część Szarotki nie istnieje!
mueschel (2022-01-20 15:37:21+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something is wrong with the tagging of these ways. E.g. "foot = use_sidepath" means that pedestrians are not allowed on this way, but must use another, separately mapped way parallel to this one. This doesn't seem to be the case here.
d1sr4n (2022-01-26 00:49:39+00:00): Hi!

Isn't separated ways supposed to be tagged as sidewalk=separate?

There is a side path right next to this ski roller track, filled with woodchips. It is there to allow runners and bikes avoid collision with skiers. I'm not sure should I add it as a separate way or not, since there is virtually no space between them.
mueschel (2022-01-26 09:09:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965379519
The relevant tags are:
bicycle = use_sidepath
roller_ski = designated
sidepath = right
sidepath:surface = woodchips

I see two issues here: 'use_sidepath' requires a separate highway=path near the main road. And 'sidepath' as a key is not in use elsewhere. If you use sidewalk=separate, then you need to have a separate way representing the sidewalk as well.


If the two ways are not separated, we shouldn't map them as two separate ways.

We could either: 
1. Map the woodships as 'sidewalk'
2. Treat it like a two-lane road and use the :lanes Suffix.

1. gives us
sidewalk = right
sidewalk:right:surface = woodchips
sidewalk:right:bicycle = designated

2. gives us
surface:lanes = asphalt|woodchips
roller_ski:lanes = designated|no
foot:lanes = |designated (don't know if they are forbidden on the asphalt?)
bicycle:lanes = |designated
Ma4G (2022-01-15 13:24:31+00:00): Meinte natürlich: Website ergänzt und Hinweis ergänzt.
DonRoPL (2022-12-30 14:09:00+00:00): fire_hydrant:name = Hy 22471 is better to tag as ref= 22471
Polarbear-repair (2022-01-26 16:05:56+00:00): Hallo NaturAufnahmen, 
du zeichnest hier einen highway=proposed, ohne eine Quelle anzugeben. 
Da sich eine geplante Strasse nicht durch Augenschein nachprüfen lässt - woher stammt das?
Wieso ist sie als 'residential' vorgeschlagen, obwohl sie durch ein Gewerbegebiet verläuft?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
user_5359 (2022-01-16 13:35:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021411233, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021411234. What is the meaning of the tag bygningsty = Tank/Silo
osmviborg (2022-01-16 13:48:25+00:00): Deleted.
abakus_uploader (2022-01-15 23:32:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
andershl (2023-02-04 15:00:45+00:00): Brønlunhus is not here. According to Nunat Aqqi it is some km to the northwest. I have pinpointed an approximate position (so there are currently TWO Brønlundhus), but cannot identify it in ID-editor with Maxar Premium as background. Strange, because I can see a lot of other houses and cabins, so some further aerial photo seach is needed....
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
mapuit (2022-01-18 16:28:49+00:00): Oh, Danke. :)
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 12:02:52+00:00): Hi Ingbife,

you added a duplicate of the name as value of the place tag here, could you check it out?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-01-16 12:23:01+00:00): Hi! Shouldn't wikimedia_commons tag be used? BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116184032
Aleks-Berlin (2022-01-16 14:51:39+00:00): Hi Andrea Musuruane, I assume you are right. wikipedia=http...jpg is definitly wrong. I change it.
Thanks, Alexander
MxxCon (2022-01-16 01:49:39+00:00): Is it above- or below-ground garage?
Is that whole building garage or only part of it? The way you mapped it, the apartment building overlaps the other one without appropriate tags..
Nat Bradley (2022-01-16 01:57:25+00:00): Above ground, the entire building is garage. The apartment building sits "on top" of the garage where it overlaps.
Mikey Co (2022-01-28 21:36:28+00:00): I made a Fix me note on this path, as it doesn't seem to be open yet (unlike the other section that you have excellently mapped) having walked it yesterday.
dml2 (2022-01-29 01:32:54+00:00): You are correct, gates prevent cyclists from using it. but it does  appear to be open to walkers. I have changed it to a footpath temporarily. When it is fully open, someone can change it back to footpath and cycle way and make it NCN 12, together with the section of footpath that runs parallel to The Ridgeway. Do you think that's OK?
Mikey Co (2022-01-29 08:41:39+00:00): That sound fair. The top entrance (at The Ridgeway) was locked for everyone when I was there, maybe I was unlucky. I've no idea when the whole scheme is meant to be open - I've not seen any details - at the moment the path is sand, will it be tarmaced? - and at some point I assume the style opposite will be removed too!
None of the signage has been updated yet, and the London LOOP trail hasn't been diverted either.
PT-53 (2022-02-20 11:33:43+00:00): Hallo fbausch,
Du hast diese Abbiegebeschränkung (TR) 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13676522
vom Typ "Nur links Abbiegen" neu angelegt.

Darf man von diesem Straßenabschnitt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253246181/history#map=19/49.40029/8.67813
wirklich nicht geradeaus fahren sondern muß links abbiegen auf diese Straße
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24223732/history

Müßte das nicht eine TR vom Typ  "Nicht links abbiegen" bzw. "Nur geradeaus fahren" sein?

Auch enthält die TR die falschen from- und via-Mitglieder.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
fbausch (2022-02-21 10:56:41+00:00): Die Abbiegebeschränkung ist schon richtig. Wenn man vom Czernyring von Westen kommt, darf man nur links abbiegen. Das hab ich extra gestern noch mal geprüft.
Was ist denn an den Members falsch?
PT-53 (2022-02-21 11:28:26+00:00): Hallo fbausch, 
ob die TR
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13676522#map=15/49.4009/8.6792
wirklich fehlerhaft ist, kann ich - nach aktuellem Wiki-Studium - nicht sagen.
Ich würde jedenfalls das from-Mitglied durch diesen Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253246181#map=19/49.40029/8.67813
und die beiden via-Mitglieder durch diesen Straßenknoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/262579543/history
ersetzen.

Wie Du hier 
- https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=19&lat=49.400273&lon=8.678381&layer=Grayscale&overlays=FFT
sehen kannst, wird dort (nur) für die TR
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3395521/history
ein Fehlerhinweis angezeigt. Dieser wurde erst bemerkt, als Du an diesem Straßenabschnitt
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24252892/history
das Merkmal
oneway=yes
ergänzt hast.
Drehst Du in dieser TR die from- und to-Mitglieder noch gegeneinder aus?

Fragende Grüße
fbausch (2022-03-01 16:44:50+00:00): Ich habe die Kreuzung, bzw. die TR noch einmal überarbeitet. Ich denke, sie sollten jetzt stimmen.
DaveF (2022-01-16 15:32:56+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2984303419
There is already a railway=station. What is the purpose of this node?
Railwayfan2005 (2022-01-16 17:22:03+00:00): Sorry missed that one. The nodes actually on the (double) tracks should be stop positions.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-16 07:26:40+00:00): What are you doing? Why do you delete the ref number of China's expressway?
渤海西岸 (2022-01-16 07:30:17+00:00): Don't delete the ref number.
rza31 (2022-01-23 22:26:38+00:00): I don´t delete a ref-number intentionally.
If you have an example for a way or relation number this would be helpful for me.
At first I can't find the missing ref.
MrX_ua (2022-01-16 18:24:58+00:00): Please correct surface smoothness from bad to intermediate as it is in reality
gektor1488 (2022-01-16 18:33:31+00:00): nothing can be done until the road is repaired, changing the tag will not help improve the quality of the surface. having passed this section, my opinion is that the coverage is bad. you can change everything at your discretion - OSM is an open project
MrX_ua (2022-01-16 18:40:27+00:00): Please change the tag or I will. smoothness=bad is not the actually state of the road. Please read the wiki before you edit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness?uselang=en
gektor1488 (2022-01-16 18:53:06+00:00): Of course I read the wiki. In my opinion, the road in this state is "bad". if I got into the region of your influence, I won’t argue, the edit war is not interesting to me. one request - change as you wish, but do not roll back my edits
MrX_ua (2022-01-16 18:56:48+00:00): No problem. I will indeed change to intermediate at some point to keep the history as it does perfectly match the state of the road. As a matter of fact I ride it in thin wheels bike with no issues. Anyway - TY and happy mapping
mueschel (2022-01-22 16:28:59+00:00): Hallo,
'height:range:hub' gibt es sonst nirgends - was ist der Unterschied zum normalen 'height:hub'?
windkraft-os (2022-01-22 18:16:20+00:00): Kleiner Fehler :(
Nordpfeil (2022-01-16 11:20:54+00:00): What does the tag
"building:yes=down"
mean?
benjamin1180 (2022-01-16 14:22:46+00:00): This is obviously a mistake. I think, this happened while working with my small Tablet-PC. I already fixed it.
Thank you for the hint!
CRCulver (2022-01-15 16:01:16+00:00): This changeset involved changing the tag surface=concrete:blocks on a road to surface=paving_stones. surface=concrete:blocks is not documented on the OSM wiki. However, the wiki for paving_stones:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones

shows that this is the appropriate tag for the surface that is visible on Mapillary.
eggie (2022-01-15 18:56:27+00:00): Dag Maarten.. 
Je vraagt feedback..
Wanneer het hier aangegeven zou staan met Verboden toegang oid heb je het correct gedaan.
MVG
eggie
dcapillae (2022-01-15 18:03:11+00:00): Hi, Rumbrummer. Thank for the changes.

Your changeset was reverted and reloaded to keep the history of the node. See "Good Practice#Keep the history" on the OSM Wiki for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history.

Thank you for your collaboration.

Regards,

Daniel
rumbrummer (2022-01-15 18:10:50+00:00): Hi Daniel,

thanks for trhe feedback.

What was may mistake?

Regards

Markus
rumbrummer (2022-01-15 18:19:14+00:00): Ah - I think I understand: Instead of shifting pass node into street onto node of street (removes original pass node and transfers tags to street node) it is better to drag pass node on road leg (keeps original node). Right ?
dcapillae (2022-01-15 18:30:27+00:00): Right! Don't worry. No mistake. It is only a good practice: whenever possible, keep the history.

Every OSM element (node, way, relation) has a history associated with it. The history of each element preserves all the changes that the element has had over time.

It is a good practice to keep the history. If you use the JOSM editor, you can merge elements instead of deleting them. This preserves the history. I don't usually use iD, although there may be a similar option.

Regards,

Daniel
rumbrummer (2022-01-15 18:36:56+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I have modified several mountain passes (with iD) - unfortunately many times with lost history.
I will try if I can revert it with level0-Editor as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0
Famlam (2022-02-06 19:52:13+00:00): Betreffende: 
> Is dit goed gemapt?
Ik zou het niet anders gedaan hebben :)

Ik zal de fixme verwijderen
Ewen Hill (2022-01-17 01:45:12+00:00): Should be Intermittent
Thomas8122 (2022-01-17 14:05:25+00:00): mit dem Changeset hast du ganz Radebeul-Ost zum Weinberg gemacht, habs mal rückgängig gemacht; den Weinberg den du eigentlich benamsen wolltest, müsstest du allerdings nochmal benennen
Gruß Thomas
eggie (2022-01-15 16:56:38+00:00): Mooi..  een nieuw paadje..  
Ik heb van surface=gravel surface=fine_gravel genmaakt. Dan routeert het ook voor fietsers. Echte gravel is niet te fietsen.

MVG
eggie
DeBigC (2022-01-17 22:57:29+00:00): Thanks for getting that for me. I forget my own notes :)
RicoElectrico (2022-01-16 20:19:01+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za poprawę. Warto by było zgłosić urzędowi gminy, że mają w rejestrze błędną adresację, bo to stamtąd zostały zaimportowane te adresy.

Do tego, całkiem skasowałem ten punkt adresowy gdzie było 6 - bo tak to został niepełny adres z ulicą, miejscowością i kodem pocztowym.
IlBano (2023-01-04 16:11:52+00:00): Ciao antmusq.
Un paio di considerazioni sulle modifiche che hai apportato.
La strada che collega la SS392 e la SS127 viene usata normalmente per evitare di passare per Tempio Pausania oltre che a portare all'area industriale ? Nel caso forse ha senso che sia una secondary come da tuo edit, ma nella sua interezza quindi anche nella parte a nord che è rimasta tertiary.
Il secondo punto riguarda le strade che si diramano da quella di cui sopra ed entrano nella zona industriale.
Quelle erano di tipo service come è corretto che siano ("strade di accesso a... complessi industriali" vedi wiki) mentre tertiary è sbagliato come valore perchè destinato a vie di collegamento (in genere "fra piccoli comuni").

IlBano
Hevał (2022-01-29 08:40:15+00:00): please prioritize Kurdish in your next edits.
jmty8 (2022-01-25 10:42:51+00:00): Hello, in this changeset a lot of secondary roads were moved to the right a little, but the consequences are not so. Can you check and revert the replacement? Please let me know. You can see it here, for example, https://sites.mapbox.com/id-internal/#background=Bing&disable_features=boundaries&feedback_id=crossinghighways-154395725-297745802&id=w9864976&map=18.25/48.13052/8.89262, everything is in place but the main secondary road is not.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116188725
konrad470 (2022-01-25 13:57:13+00:00): Hello, the "secondary roads" you are referreing to, are in fact cross-country-skiing-tracks. The roads are still in place only the pistes are moved a little (this year?) by the operator. I tracked them with my GPS-device. So everything should be fine.
skyper (2022-01-26 15:36:20+00:00): Hallo Konrad

War vielleicht ein Versehen aber z.B. folgende Punkte und etliche mehr sind von Dir verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1665304342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/541005582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/408342460

Diese drei alle um die gleiche Distanz von etwas mehr als 7 Meter.
Somit wird dieses Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563953879) von der Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627835829) durchquert.

Bitte verwende in BaWü immer Maps4BW zum Abgleich. Die Gebäude sind meist sehr Lage genau und eignen sich gut zum Ausrichten der Luftbilder. Bei Bing kann das aber auch gerne alle paar 100 Meter nötig sein. Eine einzelne GPS-Aufzeichnung kann schnell auch mal 10 oder mehr Meter abweichen. Da braucht es auch häufig Anpassungen oder besser etliche Aufzeichnungen der selben Strecke.

Habe gerade versucht, ob es einfach zu zurückzusetzen ist, aber u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116587265 hat schon einiges wieder gerade gerückt allerdings leider nicht alles. Was bei über 1000 Knoten auch nicht verwunderlich ist.