piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
sorcrosc (2017-02-07 20:59:02+00:00): What is this garbage of free nodes? Where do they come from?
Fredie (2017-02-08 07:09:52+00:00): OMG
data crash while uploading
I'll repair immediately
scratera (2017-02-11 07:48:50+00:00): Fredle...then do something useful at all, stop deleting things that are pleasing to you and ruin the work done by others
Ranger444 (2017-03-14 22:17:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473066518/history#map=19/24.48034/54.35862

These two parallel streets are not one ways as you edited. Please Fix.
Ranger444 (2017-03-14 22:35:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24196646

Another thats not one way.
dudka (2017-02-09 10:00:19+00:00): Thanks for railway details!
It seems that some railway ways still missing service=*. Would you like to review them?
http://pavlo-dudka.github.io/osm-pg-tests/test.html?map?railway.islands.main#zoom=14&lat=49.69303&lon=37.64207
jaimemd (2017-02-09 10:39:07+00:00): Hi dudka, thanks for your message. Of course I will complete my work. I usually like wait some days until my changes are rendered but sometimes is gets out of my mind and it takes some time until I get back to it. With your help it will be easier to do. Additionally I would give service=* to even more railway tracks especially the lage shunting yard (Kupyansk sort.)
Spanholz (2017-02-07 19:40:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

you added a lot of footways, but please connect them with the streets. Else there will be no routing possible and will be quite useless.

You also cut Old Madison Pike in half, south of the park, could you fix it?
Spanholz (2017-02-07 19:21:56+00:00): You added three water wells here, are you sure? What do you wanted to add?
Constable (2018-01-26 17:38:30+00:00): hi there, why did you add all those paths here? I cant see them looking at the aerial imagery
Please reply to this message, otherwise we might decide to delete your edits, as they looks suspicious/fictional
Thanks
SomeoneElse (2018-12-16 12:58:25+00:00): @Constable Hello,
I see that some of these Pokemon additions have been reverted - is there anything else that needs looking at?
Best Regards,
Andy
Constable (2018-12-16 14:42:07+00:00): Hi Andy. My message is 11 months old and I've been reverting a huge amount of pokemon related objects in the past year. Sorry but I can't remember if something was left to be removed.
SomeoneElse (2018-12-16 14:57:45+00:00): Thanks - it looked like they'd all gone TBH, I just wanted to double-check.
MiroJanosik (2017-02-14 14:02:25+00:00): Ahoj, vidím že vodná nádrž už má meno ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4415158#map=17/48.72171/17.64467 ) a waterway=dam by nemal byt nastavovany na bodoch ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam ) ale iba na liniach alebo plochach kde je stena priehrady.

Takze ak je tam nejaka stena priehrady tak to oznac ako liniu

 ahoj, Miro
highflyer74 (2017-02-08 10:58:02+00:00): Hallo Domerink und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Du hast hier und in Deinen anderen Änderungssätzen vermutlich gut gemeinte Dinge hinzugefügt, die aber (leider fast alle) noch einmal nachgearbeitet werden müssen. Zunächst einmal: bitte gehe etwas sparsamer mit landuse=grass um. Viele der von Dir eingetragenen Flächen sind gar keine Grassflächen. Eigentlich handelt es sich in erster Linie um ein landuse=residential (und zwar nur eines). Teilweise überschnitten sich Flächen, landuse=* war an Gebäude und Wege geklebt usw. Um die Datenqualität von OSM sicherzustellen, habe ich einige Flächen wieder entfernt.

Aber es gibt noch viel zu tun: Bitte nutze das name=* Tag nur für Eigennamen. Ein Haus heisst nicht "Mehrfamilienhaus". Es bekommt das Tag building=apartments und kein name=*. Auch ein Baum bekommt nicht name=Baum. Die Häuser sind krumm und schief. So sind sie in Wirklichkeit bestimmt nicht ;-) Wir zeichnen nur die Grundfläche der Häuser. Da das Bing-Bild ein wenig schräg ist, kannst Du behelfsweise die Dachfläche nehmen und diese dann Richtung Grundfläche verschieben.

Benutze aussagekräftige Kommentare für Deine Änderungen. "Aktuell" ist nicht ausreichend.

Bevor Du weitermappst, lies Dir bitte die Grundlagen von OSM an.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße!
Ranger444 (2017-03-14 21:43:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170335288#map=19/24.47604/54.35175

This is not a one way.

Where are you getting your oneway data?
Ranger444 (2017-03-14 21:44:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476906032#map=19/24.47612/54.35245

neither is this
GinaroZ (2017-02-07 20:02:08+00:00): While it's good you've removed the unnecessary name from the school, would it not be better to improve the map by adding the actual name?
You could have a look at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/G/ for the name
Mike Baggaley (2017-02-07 20:29:06+00:00): HI, yes you are quite right. I had not seen the list you mention before.

However, I am going through a process of removing a few hundred of these throughout the UK (not just schools) and  looking every one up would be too time consuming, as I don't necessarily know the postcode areas. Also, the website says the data cannot be used directly for inputting names into OSM. Hopefully once these names have been removed, others who live nearby may notice that they have no name and will add them. They will also get added to the Schools Without Names report on the same website, so that will also help to highlight them.

If you know of any similar tools for other items (especially Town Halls, Village Halls and Post Offices) that can be used for direct lookup and entry into OSM I'd be very interested.

Thanks for the info,
Mike
GinaroZ (2017-02-08 17:40:04+00:00): Well in this case I googled the village name + primary school and visited the website to confirm the name/location. 
There's also the website https://schools.mapthe.uk/ (not working at the moment) which uses OS open data to add the polygon and name data.
Not sure I'd rely on people noticing there's no name - might be an idea to leave a note as well, asking if anyone knows the name?
Only thing for post offices is http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ - but as it says the data is © Royal Mail so only useful to guide you for surveys, or leaving notes.
Mike Baggaley (2017-02-09 08:26:37+00:00): The error checking website http://keepright.at flags schools with no name as errors, so they should get noticed. Thanks for the info on post offices.

Cheers,
Mike
ajashton (2017-07-07 16:04:44+00:00): What was duplicate? The wikidata tag now seems to point to the wrong entity
Mesowhite (2017-07-07 19:05:32+00:00): Sorry did not change my edit description what Duplicate was used for was just to combine the CFB Edmonton areas into a multipolygon. The one specific edit was just a name update.

Cheers
Stereo (2017-02-08 06:08:07+00:00): The changeset comment should read:

Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
GinaroZ (2017-02-08 23:57:32+00:00): Do you have a source for this paths you added? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473077934
It looks suspiciously like you've just copied the Fife Council core paths map...
Carlos Brys (2017-02-11 20:03:23+00:00): Puedes describir mejor el objeto para poderr clasificarlo y ponerle una definición adecuada ?
LucoDeAlethea (2017-02-12 13:11:00+00:00): Se trata de um galpão abrigando um gerador hidroelétrico, aproveitando das variações marginais do fluxo do rio ( downstream das represas e das cataratas ).
LucoDeAlethea (2017-02-12 13:15:05+00:00): Hydroelectric generator hosted in a stilted structure, taking advantage of marginal variations of river's flow, downstream the waterfalls and dams.
Carlos Brys (2017-02-14 14:41:25+00:00): Se completó la información del nodo
Alexander-II (2017-02-08 04:00:55+00:00): Привет. Центр восстановления зрения уже отмечен на карте. Дубль удаляют.
literan (2017-02-08 14:38:41+00:00): области с одним тегом area=yes (т.е. без каких-либо содержательных тегов) не нужны, и их придется удалить
nikiforov (2017-02-08 22:53:32+00:00): 1. Не стоит давать названия типа «базарок», потому что это не название. В тегах и так прописано, что там продаются фрукты и овощи.
2. Для строительного магазина есть тег shop=doityourself.
3. Для комиссионных — shop=second_hand.
nikiforov (2017-02-08 23:00:06+00:00): А ещё лучше рынки обозначать как amenity=marketplace.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace
eggie (2017-02-07 20:42:00+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Mogen fietsers wel tegen het verkeer in hier. oneway:bicycle=no
Ik zie in de andere changesets toch wat vreemde zaken. Doe je voorzichtig met de kaart!
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
MKnight (2017-03-05 21:41:36+00:00): Bitte halte dich an das gängige Schema für Öffnungszeiten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours 

Deine Werte prüfen kannst Du mittels: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ oder einem Editor, der Checks gegen Plausibilität VOR dem Hochladen verwendet: JOSM.
chillly (2017-02-07 20:15:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You seem to have made some odd edits. I suspect you were testing the editor and saved your experiments. I will revert (undo) your edit.
eggie (2017-02-07 20:52:54+00:00): Beste MDJ, Wat is de reden dat deze weg op slot staat voor alle verkeer? Ik haal access=no weg. Mocht het anders zijn dan hoor ik het wel.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2017-02-07 21:08:40+00:00): Ik zag in de historie dat de voorgaande mapper Marc Le Grand de weg op slot had gezet voor alle verkeer. Het witte bord met de rode rand. Ook de oostelijke Middenweg stond op slot. Die heb ik ook opengezet. Ook actie Marc Le Grand. Ik heb 'm een bericht gestuurd om opheldering. 
Groet,
Eggie
ramyaragupathy (2017-03-21 06:12:18+00:00): Hello Mark Wong, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Happy to see you editing here, but this changeset in particular seems to be adding a duplicate data to ʻIolani Palace. So I've removed the duplicate from your edits. 

Thanks
Ramya
Nakaner-repair (2017-02-07 19:38:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45696511, 45801140, 45801162, 45801754, 45801872, 45801934, 45801954, 45801961, 45802057, 45802097, 45802155, 45802191, 45802231, 45802242, 45802250, 45802278, 45802291, 45802317, 45802370, 45802388, 45802395, 45802423, 45802435, 45802452, 45802464, 45802475, 45802500, 45802561, 45821412, 45821781, 45821797, 45821855, 45821905, 45821953, 45821975, 45821998, 45822058, 45822095, 45822178, 45822190, 45822223, 45822233, 45822247, 45822257, 45822281, 45822292, 45822313, 45822340, 45822361, 45822370, 45822376, 45822398, 45822430, 45824656, 45825202, 45830018, 45830203, 45830228, 45830238, 45830300, 45830324, 45830342, 45830381, 45830412, 45830430.
RoterEmil (2017-02-09 21:42:18+00:00): Hallo armin_fx, entlang der Reiherbergstr. hast Du ja etliche Adressen ergänzt. Allerdings gab es da Unstimmigkeiten mit der PLZ. Die Grenze von 14469 u. 14476 verläuft (mutmaßlich) entlang des Kuhforter Damms. "streckenkundler" hat dies heute in einem CS (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45956382) geändert. Ich habe die beiden Adressen, die Du westl. vom Kuhforter Damm heute eingetragen hast, ebenfalls korrigiert.
Falls Du jedoch sicher weißt, dass all die Häuser zur PLZ 14469 gehören, sag bitte Bescheid. Dann müsste die PLZ-Grenze angepasst werden. Ansonsten verwende bitte in diesem Gebiet die 14476 ;)

Schönen Abend/Tag
armin_fx (2017-02-09 22:43:17+00:00): Hallo RoterEmil,
Die PLZ-Grenze verläuft tatsächlich entlang Kuhforter Damm.
Da habe ich nicht aufgepasst.
Danke für den Hinweis.
RoterEmil (2017-02-10 12:17:07+00:00): Danke für die ganz schnelle Antwort. Alles gar kein Problem, happy mapping!
chillly (2017-02-07 20:17:41+00:00): I am going to undo your doodles. If you want some help with editing, please ask.

We want new editors, but the things you add or change must be real things, in the right place and correctly described.
Fredie (2017-02-08 14:00:22+00:00): who do you think are you ?
who gives you right to revert other mappers work, just you dislike their way to do ?
There is no vandalism in this changeset.

Mappers like you shall be banned !
sbiribizio (2017-02-08 14:16:48+00:00): I reported your behaviour to the Data Workig Group.
In the Italian community we reached a consensus to revert some of your changeset, so I acted accordingly.
I ask you gently to read the thread in the italian mailing list here (it's in italian):
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Utente-Fredie-e-modifiche-grossolane-tp5890760.html
I invite you to join the talk-it mailing list and to explain in english or german (if you prefer) your position, doubts about my operate.
sabas88 (2017-02-08 15:42:18+00:00): Fredie, usually if some local is telling you you're doing something wrong they should have a reason. You're the chair mapper, not the one with local knowledge.
dforsi (2017-02-08 16:56:51+00:00): Fredie, stop acting as a child and join the Italian mailing list to explain your reasons. If the locals don't agree with your mapping you  can't continue as you were alone.
Fredie (2017-02-08 16:59:44+00:00): the local community's decision has to be accepted.
I was not invited to the discussion, so I had no idea
The changeset is huge and it a lot of my work is destroyed.
I don't map to spoil the OSM database.
I simply have other progressing in mapping  than other mappers. Overlapping landuse to highway is not forbitten and pretty well performed by other mappers. (and I've seen really bad mapping along my way)
I already said that I stopped  my work along River Po here.
I'l do more basical work now.
Please remember that OSM is open to anyone.
scratera (2017-02-08 21:36:23+00:00): Fredi you've destroyed a lot of work by other mappers
GinaroZ (2017-02-07 20:44:24+00:00): Are you actually able to walk along this path? If so, what happens when you reach the A823 bridge?
BrianBru (2017-02-13 08:49:06+00:00): Its an only railway line now a footpath so you can walk under the bridge.
Peda_repair (2017-02-07 20:48:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45808795, 45808718, 45794130, 45793877, 45794427, 45810330, 45807187, 45793858, 45807022, 45794549, 45795568, 45793775, 45810026, 45809203, 45794196, 45794400, 45794308, 45794321, 45794453, 45809771, 45795861, 45794711, 45794067, 45807146, 45813479, 45794552, 45808974, 45871525, 45794338, 45794564, 45809540, 45793810, 45794544, 45794216.
Carnildo (2017-02-07 22:21:26+00:00): The "name" field should only be used to give the names of things, not to describe them.  It's obvious from the tags that a path is a path, so you don't also need to name it "path".
corfede (2017-02-07 20:43:27+00:00): Ho sbagliato l'oggetto del changeset. Qui ho recuperato gli edifici della CTR Puglia, che erano stati modificati arbitrariamente per correggere la viabilità.
eggie (2017-02-08 08:00:15+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuilding tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden,
MVG, Eggie
mueschel (2017-02-08 11:38:10+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "Building features=building" on 207 buildings - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
Bgabor (2017-02-08 14:39:52+00:00): Well, seems by mistake - mixed the tag what was used in ID.
bpowell1 (2017-02-07 21:09:48+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
Baloo Uriza (2017-02-08 08:17:59+00:00): Please don't use name=* as a description; if it doesn't have a name, don't add a name.
Cascafico (2017-02-08 07:27:30+00:00): Potresti aggiungere anche il numero di riferimento CAI? Per esempio:

name=Via dei Mulini
operator=CAI
ref=nnn
Andrea Zinutti (2017-02-08 12:42:45+00:00): Ciao cascafico, io uso ID come posso fare? Il numero non ce sulla tabacco l'operatore e il cai si ma come lo metto da Id?
Cascafico (2017-02-08 15:44:14+00:00): ti scrivo in privato
Ranger444 (2017-03-10 17:34:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24160948/history

What sort of verification or evidence do you have that this is a oneway? I do not believe it is a oneway
maraf24 (2018-02-13 10:48:50+00:00): Usunięte.
DUGA (2021-04-18 16:42:51+00:00): Are you sure it is a quarry? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473153512#map=19/40.57634/-77.85412
maraf24 (2017-03-31 18:34:19+00:00): Zakaz wjazdu dodaje się poprzez relację zakazu wjazdu.
user_3216889 (2017-02-07 22:24:43+00:00): Indien hier enkel een kantoor is, gebruik dan
office=company
i.p.v.
amenity=kindergarten

Overigens zijn je bijdragen zeer welkom!

Er is een Nederlandstalig forumdeel, waar je altijd met vragen terecht kunt:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Frostmaiden (2017-02-12 09:39:33+00:00): Thanks! Aangepast.
Enrico_Bibbiena (2017-02-07 21:41:47+00:00): error in note of changeset: adding way
Spanholz (2017-02-08 08:43:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

you added some footways, but maybe they are more like paths - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

Have fun mapping!
Spanholz (2017-02-08 08:09:41+00:00): The park looks great! Well mapped!
aceman444 (2019-09-22 14:17:44+00:00): Hi, sorry, but this changeset is completely wrong. You do not provide the source for your changes, but they do not match aerial imagery nor cadastral map, so I can only assume you used survey and GPS device. But it seems it was very imprecise and destroyed correct building shapes. GPS does not work precisely on slopes and in such narrow roads between buildings. Please do not use such imprecise sources to modify existing buildings in Slovakia which we import from cadastre office.
I hope at least the address changes are correct.
Thanks.
Thunder08 (2019-09-27 18:10:48+00:00): No, previous shapes have been incorrect. Your comment is not actual because I made changes so long time ago. All I remember, that adresses there are changed and some builting on cadastral map is divided by purts. But OSM is not cadastral map and there is not needed to divide buildings by virtual parts.
Thunder08 (2019-09-27 18:13:15+00:00): I write contours by Bing imagenary. Adresses maybe I take from building tables on facade or|and use actual list of registered monuments
aceman444 (2019-09-27 18:39:43+00:00): You can't leave it, can you? I tell you not to do it and you again destroyed all the buildings using imprecise bing images. We have much more higher-resolution images for Slovakia and also cadastral map is much more precise. There was no need to touch those buildings again using Bing.

It is you who artificially divided buildings now (for the 2A address).

Your new changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75022041 is completely useless and damaging and will be reverted.
Thunder08 (2019-09-27 18:51:55+00:00): I see brandmauer between 2 and 2a at aerial photo  - thats mean of different sctructures. at aeral photo. Fix your eyes is you dont see it.
Thunder08 (2019-09-27 18:56:04+00:00): Is totaly different buildings with totally different level of storeys. And you union this two different structures in one contour - this is useless editing.
aceman444 (2019-09-27 19:03:22+00:00): I see that wall separating the 2 different structures. But that does not mean they are 2 separate buildings. There is NO such rule in OSM to split buildings on shape/level-count change. If you want to model 3D shape of the building, please learn https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings. I did that modelling correctly using building:part=* on the building 6378.
Thunder08 (2019-09-27 19:09:22+00:00): Building=structure. Why I need wrote you so simple things?

The dividing by buildings is core of OSM mapping, because this map of building not map of adress contours or cadastral map.
aceman444 (2019-10-26 13:00:05+00:00): There is no such rule as building=structure. You made it up. Also, there is no definition what a 'structure' is. Even if there were such a rule, you wouldn't know where each structure starts and ends, by just looking at Bing photos.
So in absence of any such rule, we can use what cadastral map considers a building, a shape with unique conscription number. If if not the best, it is still better than your random splitting of buildings just by number of floors/levels.

So please do not apply your misleading rule in OSM. Thanks.
Hjart (2017-02-07 22:10:39+00:00): Hvorfor slette denne adresse?
PeriAssedrup (2017-02-08 06:05:15+00:00): Har lavet ændringer. Er ikke klar over hvilken adresse du mener.
Hjart (2017-02-08 09:17:23+00:00): Den eneste ændring du laver i dette rettesæt er at slette adressen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/341860055/history (Assedrupvej 35)
PeriAssedrup (2017-02-08 15:30:12+00:00): Det var ikke meningen.
Ved ikke hvad der er sket.
Kan ikke lige se hvordan jeg sletter ændringen.?
Hjart (2017-02-08 15:34:10+00:00): Det kræver lidt teknisk indsigt at rulle tilbage, men nu har jeg gjort det.
PeriAssedrup (2017-02-08 15:38:38+00:00): tak for det.
Hjart (2017-02-08 15:41:10+00:00): Velbekomme.
Iøvrigt, tak for dine bidrag indtil videre.
Bonix-Mapper (2017-02-09 05:48:26+00:00): Bem-vindo,

Analisando pelo celular parece que você uniu a area da praça com as vias ao redor. Se for isso mesmo eu gostaria de sugerir que a área da praça não fosse conectada às vias. 

Obrigado e bom mapeamento.
Grillo (2017-07-01 20:17:12+00:00): Hej! Noden med turistattraktion i nordöst ligger mitt på en åker så den tar jag bort. Noden i sydväst, intill vattensamlingen, är det en informationsskylt av något slag?
PierZen (2017-03-21 23:03:54+00:00): Voies temporaires lors de travaux routiers ne doivent pas etre ajoutées comme bretelles d'autoroute.

Road maintenance temporary lines should not be added as motorway links.
DannyAiquipa (2017-03-21 23:20:28+00:00): Hi PierZen,  i will revert my changeset ,thanks for your comment! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47054005
Mike Baggaley (2017-02-10 14:53:44+00:00): Hi, is "Harker Way (Corby Link Road)" the actual road name? It seems more likely it would be "Harker Way" with "Corby Link Road" as an alternative name. If the latter,  "Corby Link Road" should go in the alt_name field rather than in brackets after Harker Way. If the former is correct, I suggest adding a note to say that this really is the name.

Best wishes,
Mike
ftrebien (2017-02-19 15:00:18+00:00): Por favor desconecte a área da via.