piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Irma IRM-ED (2023-01-25 22:56:11+00:00): Hello kritzy_8,
Thank you for the contribution of adding data in OSM!
I am currently doing remote mapping for road validation in Thailand.
I need your help especially regarding this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/67135981)

I see a "Layer=?" tag on this road object (16.4686258, 102.8295841). I'm not sure if you or someone else added this tag but did you know that the road is on a different layer than the surrounding roads? Is this street under a corridor? What floor is the building on? 
or is there any other information that you can explain?

I would appreciate any information you can provide.
Thank you.
user_12531033 (2022-03-31 21:27:12+00:00): 南仓站应该画完了，有错误的话欢迎留言
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 21:32:12+00:00): 119163369 119163144 119163031 119162856 119162680 119155231 119155204 119155012 119154566 119154404 119153684 119152815 119125591 119125536 119125466 119125273 119125233 119125183 119125118 119125009 119124945 119124836 119124803 119124688 119124660 119124618 119124556 119124533 119124496 119124317 119124259 119098054 119097970 119097882 119097808 119097740 119088623 119088502 119088462 119088451 119088370 119088296 119088246 119088228 119088207 119088180 119088144 119088126 119088087 119088062 119087809 119087779 119087570 119087432 119087318 119087298 119087239 119087228 119087114 119087078 119087051 119087048 119087009 119086975 119086930 119086926 119086856 119086837 119086819 119086794 119086746 119086699 119086644 119086601 119086449 119086309 119086277 119086209 119085677 119085607 119085466 119085455 119085396 119085376 119085292 119085278 119085157 119084939 119084801 119084691 119084552 119084457 119079481 119078804 119078649 119078452 119075537 119073959 119073733 119073462 119065390 119065124 119062836 119058018
felipeeugenio (2022-03-31 21:43:08+00:00): Estimado
Para que las casas queden "cuadradas", es decir, con ángulos rectos; seleccionar la casa y apretar la letra Q.
saludos
nb_villanueva (2022-03-31 21:47:49+00:00): Súper, muchas gracias por tu ayuda!

saludos
archpdx (2022-04-01 06:28:52+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that buildings (https://wiki.osm.org/Buildings) and swimming pools (https://wiki.osm.org//Tag:leisure=swimming_pool) in OSM are only used for building outlines and swimming pool outlines respectively. These should instead be mapped these separate from the facility. There should be a preset named 'Swimming Pool Facility' that would work better for this area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119178328
Mordechai23 (2022-04-01 14:58:30+00:00): Hello, is this tunnel really legally open for cyclists and pedestrains? I thought it was a railway property and noone was allowed.

If so, it should be tagged using highway=path instead of track
emes (2022-04-01 17:46:57+00:00): It's open and there's no sign it's forbidden to enter. The tunnel is a popular shortcut for locals.

Also, the way is wide enough for a car to fit in, however without 4x4 I wouldn't risk a ride.
eggie (2022-04-01 10:37:55+00:00): Hint... Please use PDOK actueel 7cm as background for a better look. 
Greetz,
eggie
user_5359 (2022-04-01 14:20:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2022-04-01 10:35:43+00:00): Hi papamat  Hint... Please use PDOK actueel 7cm as background for a better look at the fence. 
Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
tbicr (2022-04-01 07:20:18+00:00): Вітаю, замест агрогородок па беларуску мусіць быць аграгарадок
jekhor (2022-04-02 21:14:47+00:00): Гм, каб яго халера, аўтаматыка падвяла... Зараз...
Hernan (2022-04-01 17:44:29+00:00): Los cambios que son a partir del 1/4 se hacen el 1/4, no antes
Frans S (2022-04-21 13:44:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119179509
adrianojbr (2022-04-02 23:00:10+00:00): Mapeada como via em construção, conforme notícia mais recente https://www.aen.pr.gov.br/​Noticia/​Obra-de-implantacao-do-Contorno-Noroeste-de-Francisco-Beltrao-alcanca-60-da-execucao.
BCNorwich (2022-04-01 08:16:10+00:00): Hi, Please be advised that your use of the layer tag on buildings is nullified because the building parts are joined. Please see here for advice on the use of the layer tag:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer Specifically the statement "Joining the ways with a shared node at the point where they cross would destroy the vertical order established by layer."

Regards Bernard.
DeFra85 (2022-04-20 07:21:45+00:00): Hallo "12 Oktober", ich muss dir leider sagen, dass ich dein Changeset, vor allem mit dem Bearbeitungskommentar, etwas schwierig finde.
Wenn wir hier etwas verändern übernimmt die/derjenige natürlich die Verantwortung (Haftung) dafür.

Hier ein paar Anmerkungen von mir:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042405477/ ...diesen Weg hatte ich ein paar Tage vorher als abandoned:highway erstellt, weil er nicht weiter führt und nur eine Harvester-Rinne ist
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948831538 ... hier hast du wahrscheinlich aus Versehen die Klassifizierung von Forstweg in Nebenstraße geändert
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985534 ... diesen durchgängigen Weg gibt es leider nicht (mehr), da er teilweise von Brombeeren zugewuchert ist
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985523 ... auch diesen Weg gibt es leider nicht. Ich habe die Zugänge schon des öfteren am Wegesrand gesucht. Aber da liegt auch bei mir der Fehler, da ich ihn besser auf abandoned:highway hätte setzen sollen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985519 ... hier hast du vergessen die Wege zu verbinden. Wobei ich hier nicht wirklich den Weg auf den verschiedenen Luftbildern erkenne.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985514 ... auch hier erkenne ich keinen zusammenhängenden Weg und habe ihn bei meiner letzten Wanderung vor 2 Monaten auch nicht gesehen.  Der linke Zuweg führt nach links auf die Rodungsfläche, die rechte Zuwegung ist mir überhaupt nicht aufgefallen, und die oberen Fahrspuren sind eher wieder Harvester-Rinnen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985512 ... auch bei den verschiedenen Luftbildern sehe ich keine Verbindung zum Kammweg an der Timmer Egge
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046985509#map=17/52.13676/8.19343 ... die ganzen neu eingefügten Wege von dir um den alten Steinbruch sind auch alles Harvester-Rinnen die nicht begehbar sind



Grundsätzlich bin ich froh, dass die Wege hier im Teuto zwischen A33 und Rechenbergstraße endlich auf der Karte erscheinen (war recht leer hier). Aber durch die derzeit große Abholzung, durch Borkenkäfer und Dürre, sollten wir auch vor Ort gucken ob es wirklich Forstweg/pfad ist oder nur unbegehbare Harvester-Rinne die als bald wieder zuwuchern werden.

Beste Grüße
Dennis
DeFra85 (2022-04-20 07:22:34+00:00): ... ach, hier gibt's noch ein Note zu der Gegend: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2849121
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-03 20:29:14+00:00): Please don't add hole number to name
Ginger Lover (2022-04-03 20:34:13+00:00): Sorry about that.  Understood
and bot (2022-04-01 00:42:03+00:00): منطقة بن طهيف وضواحيها
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-01 08:23:35+00:00): These changes should have been uploaded separately. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-01 12:24:43+00:00): revertido
user_5359 (2022-04-01 14:13:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is "LA Harbor Masonic Lodge #332" a shop http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-04 03:46:38+00:00): It is none it is a community center.
user_5359 (2022-04-04 03:49:04+00:00): Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre
Allison P (2022-04-04 14:19:04+00:00): A Masonic lodge is the meeting place for a Freemasonry unit. It is not really a community center, but a club=freemasonry. The wiki has a page specifically on such features. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dfreemasonry
user_5359 (2022-04-04 14:27:58+00:00): I have adjusted it. Thanks for the tip!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
Fischkopp0815 (2022-04-01 04:56:08+00:00): Wenn ich das richtig verstehe ist das bisher noch Ackerland. Ich halte für so ein Bebauungsplangebiet  landuse=greenfield für geeigneter.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield

Nebenbei: Hier überlappen sich verschiedene landuse
puma515 (2022-04-01 13:47:57+00:00): Danke für die Tipps. Der Tag: landuse=greenfield war mir noch unbekannt.

Das sich dort landuse überlappt ist mir nicht aufgefallen.

Habe das jetzt alles angepasst und auch gleich weiter info´s und ein fixme erstellt dann denke ich auch dran wenn ich mal wieder in der gegend bin das zu prüfen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119203225#map=15/53.9520/9.4557
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-01 19:39:06+00:00): Ahh you beat me too it :-D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
CoyKoi (2022-05-13 21:59:12+00:00): Agree with your point about Auckland Central, which usually is used to refer to the central suburbs of the isthmus.

To me, the "Auckland" seems redundant in "Auckland City Centre". I think just "City Centre" would be better, that is what is seen on road signs for example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=279369030565390
NyanSten (2022-05-16 06:26:54+00:00): Makes sense
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
snoozingnewt (2022-04-01 01:58:44+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.

Ве молиме користете повеќе описни коментари за промените.

~snoozingnewt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
user_11609320 (2022-04-01 02:42:20+00:00): I think the confusion is because the westside parkway is patrolled by the CHP and it currently controlled by caltrans. there was a tweet from CHP Bakersfield about it. And the report from KGET-tv, did make it sound like it was already signed as ca-58. My understanding is that it won't be signed until the centennial corridor is finished right?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
bhietsch (2022-04-01 23:03:37+00:00): Great edits! :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
DUGA (2023-09-05 01:57:15+00:00): I'm a bit confused here, where does the number come from?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9627867517/history#map=19/39.30543/-76.64293
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .