piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MatthiasMatthias (2017-12-21 21:59:36+00:00): Ich glaube ich habe den ursprünglichen Punkt schlicht übersehen. Ich hatte die Reinigung direkt am Eingang gemeint. Werde bei meinem nächsten Einkauf nachschauen ob sie "Style and Clean" oder "Fine and Clean" heißt und die beiden Einträge zusammenführen.
FvGordon (2017-12-21 23:16:28+00:00): Mir scheint, dass der eine Name oben über dem Eingang zur Reinigung steht und der andere auf den Abholscheinen.
MatthiasMatthias (2017-12-29 16:55:35+00:00): Ich habe nachgeschaut, es gibt hier nur eine Wäscherei. Die zwei POIs habe ich zusammengefügt.
EugenyN (2017-09-29 13:51:56+00:00): для кладбища у нас другой тег. я исправил.
maraf24 (2017-09-28 19:51:55+00:00): Wycofane.
user_5359 (2017-09-30 08:20:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136125674. You entry is duplicate and not the best way to describe Starbucks!
redrace (2017-10-27 12:38:58+00:00): HUHU
laut Presse soll der Kreisel am Europaring fertig sein. https://www.ksta.de/region/rhein-erft/kerpen/europaring-kreisverkehr-in-sindorf-frueher-fertig-als-geplant-28724348?dmcid=f_yho_ksta.de+%3F+RSS-Feed+Rhein-Erft
Ist das der Fall und wenn kannst Du das dann ändern!?
Schöne Grüße
p§Qy$=a]Yü (2017-11-01 22:56:41+00:00): Bin diese Woche wieder vorbei gekommen.
Der Kreisverkehr ist fertig, Fahradweg und Zufahrt von/ zu Daimlerstraße noch nicht. Hab die Änderungen eingetragen.
redrace (2017-11-02 07:53:57+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Schöne Grüße
H2172 (2017-09-28 20:15:30+00:00): http://osma.vmarc.be/en/glossary

 Information Map

    Information maps are situated along the network routes and provide an overview of the network. They can be mapped using nodes that can be optionally be added to the network relation. The analysis logic expects at least the following tags on the node to recognize it as an information map:
    tag	value
    tourism	information
    information	map
majid1359 (2017-09-28 20:23:30+00:00): دو تا مکان با  اسم مشابه بود یکی حذف شد از نقشه
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-29 06:51:27+00:00): Welcome to openstreetmap.
.
Road numbers are not "name" . They are "ref". I don't know how StreetComplete works but perhaps you have a "number" or "reference" field where you put the number.
ToniE (2017-09-29 07:37:10+00:00): Hallo camel133

access=private reicht hier völlig aus, da müssen keine weiteren tags mit =private dran.

Ich habe außerdem das kleine Anfangsstück von der Straße her ohne =private gesetzt, da es öffentlicher Bereich ist.

Spätestens dann, wenn Bürgersteige als footway gemapped werden, würde das kurze Stück mit =private verhindern, dass ein Navi einen auf die Straße routen kann.

Gruß
Toni
jraller (2018-08-02 01:40:29+00:00): Can you take a second look at this edit, particularly the north west end of it where you have a line tagged river that is going through the middle of agricultural fields?
sommerluk (2017-09-29 22:23:01+00:00): 👍 Merci !
ToniE (2017-09-29 07:48:28+00:00): Hallo Camel133,

Du hast hier ein Gebäude mit addr:* Informationen versehen.
Es existierte bereits ein Punkt mit den selben Information links am Haus, dort wo der Eingang ist.

Bitte lösche doppelte Informationen oder lasse es so wie es ist.

Ich habe die addr:* am Punkt gelöscht und durch entrance=main ersetzt.

Für einen Eintieg in OSM:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

und 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

und

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Happy mapping
Toni
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:18:01+00:00): Hello Xspex. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1251043594 you have tagged `payment:bitcoin = yes=yes` although there's `payment:bitcoin=yes`, so i think you can delete it, right? #typo
Xspex (2017-09-29 22:20:58+00:00): After 2 days of waiting to show up on bitmap and cryptomap.org I added the "double yes" and it showed up ! So I don't know exactly what's going on with these maps and their API usage ? Maybe I get some help ?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-30 06:46:07+00:00): First i don't know how often Go Map!! 1.4 upload your changes into the live and central OSM database. The web iD Editor does this immediately after you hit the Save button.
Then keep in mind that the data consumers (other maps, navigation or routing apps) are responsible for their part how often they update their sources and databases: e.g. osm.org updates the tiles in zoom 18/19 within minutes zoom 15/16 within hours, osmand generates new routingfiles once a month, and so on
user_5359 (2017-09-30 08:18:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
ToniE (2017-09-29 07:39:02+00:00): Hallo Camel133,

=transformer sind Gr0ße Transformatoren wir hier stehen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=48.05026&mlon=11.68178#map=18/48.05026/11.68178

Hier ist ein power=substation und substation=minor_distribution

Gruß
Toni
user_5359 (2017-09-30 08:17:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why Did you use hgv:access=no? hgv describe the access rights  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) , so hgv=no should be sufficient?
indence (2017-09-30 17:26:50+00:00): #COMS2200A
user_5359 (2017-09-30 06:34:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. And don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
GerdP (2017-09-29 06:00:49+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noted this change because you used the tag highway=bus_guideway
on several ways. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s3c
Please note that this is a very special kind of road, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
I assume you need highway=service here.
BillLim (2017-09-29 06:33:05+00:00): Hello, 
I am aware of the classification and believe it to be appropriate. Several sections of the BRT system runs on dedicated curbed "tracks" that are paralell and separate from the roadway and are therefore not normal bus lanes. Hence, the highway=bus_guideway tag seems appropriate. Further, the same tag is also already used on other sections of the system under the same case.
GerdP (2017-09-29 06:54:10+00:00): I think the important criteria on the wiki page are these:
"Guided buses are buses steered for part or all of their route by external means"
and "Do not use this on normal paved roadways that are designated for buses only. One correct tagging for those is highway=service, access=no, bus=designated."
BillLim (2017-09-29 15:31:10+00:00): I did read the wiki thoroughly beforehand. As the wiki also states that "Guidance systems can be either physical, such as kerbs (in American and Canadian English, "curbs"), or remote, such as optical or radio guidance." 
In the case of the system in question, it's presence of physical curbs, with special tracks (not normal paved roads). There are sections that are normal bus lane, which were tagged as that, while other section of the system would therefore qualify as bus guideway under the criteria on the wiki.
GerdP (2017-09-29 17:22:39+00:00): OK, got it. Thanks for your patience.
Constable (2017-09-29 09:09:53+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il contributo che stai dando, perché hai rimosso il tag building=yes dall'area che identificava l'edificio sede del comune?
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=52459187
Quello bordato in rosso
Grazie, ciao
Constable (2017-09-29 09:10:26+00:00): *bordato in azzurro, pardon
Constable (2017-10-19 17:33:31+00:00): nessuna risposta, ripristino l'edificio
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:22:00+00:00): Hello neo-plan. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136287567 you have tagged `sheltre` instead of `shelter`, right? #typo
neo-plan (2017-09-29 19:27:04+00:00): Yes, a mistake. Thank you! Will correct myself.
user_6110846 (2017-10-01 05:47:23+00:00): Доброго дня ми раді новим членам спільноти . Але : Перейменування Кадіївки скасовано. Правки , котрі явлються об'єктом конфлікту двох груп картографів здійснюються тоді коли між ними досягнуто домовленостей або коли є рішення центрального офісу Data Working Group . Оскільки таке рішення відсутнє то ваші дії вважаються "псуванням мапи ". Прохання надалі без дозволу внаслідок обговорень чи рішень Робочої Групи Даних не перейменовувати на радянські назви населені пункти Донбасу. Увага Якщо картораф постійно здійснює правки , що є предметом спору , без обговорень чи рішень Робочої Групи Даних - то такий картогарф визнається вандалом інформації і його акаунт блокується назавжди.
AleksS (2017-10-02 17:54:29+00:00): Выходит, что вандалом является Poliakoff Mykhailo, так как именно он переименовал Стаханов (который был с самого начала проекта OSM) месяц назад в Кадиевку, Видимо, скоро его аккаунт заблокируют навсегда.
user_6110846 (2017-10-04 05:36:29+00:00): я присвоїв актальну згідно законодавства України назву.. ДНР -то є фейк , який даже наш проект не сприймає серйозно то му і не відобразив на мапі.
AleksS (2017-10-04 15:49:38+00:00): Не надо было ничего отображать, "ваші дії вважаються "псуванням мапи" " и не соответствуют правилу "Truth on the ground"
user_6110846 (2017-10-04 18:33:03+00:00): Я Вам писав і позиція незмінна:  пишете запит у ДВГ на дозвіл намалювати територію як boundary =political  . DWG коли дає дозвіл - малюєте , показуєте DWG .  І тоді ТІЛЬКИ назва  стає Стаханов.  Це мапа така , що кожна зміна стає доступна для всього світу. Тому треба щоб все було гарно та серйозно оформлено. Те й час котрий Ви гаєте на спір - Ви б могли б з користю витратити для вирішення питання.  Я й так своїми підсказками допомагаю Вам як вирішити це.
user_6110846 (2017-10-05 12:28:42+00:00): На данный момент нет оснований строго следовать "on ground" . Соседнее госсудартво Белорусь  on ground нарушает в названиях населенных пунктов . Нарушание этого принципа они прописали даже в вики-правилах сообщества.  ДВГ об этом уведомлено и пока ничего не поменялось.  Речь идет о том что вывески в большинстве при вьезде в населенный пункт на белорусском а картографированы они , как Вы видите на русском языке. Вот когда Белорусь названия населенных пунктов переведет на белорусский согласно on ground -вот тогда и придет время отката под  Стаханов. Если Белорусь неуважает on ground указателей населенных пунктов  то почему Украина в ущерб себе должна это делать.?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51820940#map=9/53.9650/26.1090
AleksS (2017-10-05 17:01:55+00:00): По Белоруссии соглашение относится только к языку по умолчанию (тег name). Если знаки на белорусском, то "Truth on the ground" присутствует в теге белорусского языка (name:be). 
При такой аналогии здесь названия "на месте" надо занести в name:ru
user_6110846 (2017-10-05 20:15:29+00:00): То есть Кадеевку в name ru ?
AleksS (2017-10-09 10:09:26+00:00): в name:ru - Стаханов, (и прочие переименованные на бумаге населенные пункты - тоже согласно "truth on the ground")
user_6110846 (2017-10-09 12:28:23+00:00): "Если знаки на белорусском, то "Truth on the ground" присутствует в теге белорусского языка (name:be)" - что то то не то. On ground - это значение name=  . 

Вопрос в Белорусь ка кто странно тратуеться. Все начинают заниматься словоблудом . придумьівать  разное. 
А правда то на лицо ---  увиденое глазами в указателях (80 процентов по стране) отличаеться от значения name

2 На каком етапе узаконивание ДНР ЛНР ?  Ведь ето второй фактор без которого Кадиевка не может превратиться в Стаханов.
Constable (2017-09-30 08:00:45+00:00): Ciao, guarda che non è corretto aggiungere alla mappa i percorsi di gare ed eventi simili. 
Questa tua modifica andrebbe annullata. Se ti rendi conto che guardando la mappa mancano dei sentieri sei liberissimo di aggiungerli, ma creare un percorso come questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528563350 non va bene, per il fatto che mancano i tag che identificano il tipo di percorso e perché non tiene conto degli altri elementi della mappa, infatti alcuni tratti di quel segmento risultano bene o male doppioni di sentieri/strade già mappati.
Se vuoi creare un percorso non devi modificare la mappa, devi semplicemente usare uno dei tanti servizi di routing, quale http://bit.ly/2fYYM7c
Ciao
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-27 10:29:36+00:00): Maybe you can take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5363567 ?
Jakka (2017-09-29 08:47:33+00:00): foutje uit opening_hours verbeterd. Hier kan je de code uittesten:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-09-29 16:07:01+00:00): Ah, dankjewel!

Wat was er mis? Een puntkomma teveel op het einde?
Jakka (2017-09-29 16:12:20+00:00): Yep.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-09-29 17:17:42+00:00): Trouwens, is er een manier om de toegangsprijzen ook toe te voegen?
Jakka (2017-09-29 17:23:41+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge is een mogelijkheid. Maar dat wordt dan moeilijk om deze up to date te houden
Pieter Vander Vennet (2017-10-01 17:26:59+00:00): De charge is nogal complex met leeftijdscategorieën, maar zou niet echt mogen veranderen....
DaveF (2017-09-29 09:22:15+00:00): Hi Neil
I think you've used old imagery for the Lamplighters garden:
http://tinyurl.com/y73kkgqj
ndm (2017-09-29 19:30:22+00:00): Well obviously I can't use that link :-)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52487166 -- is based on more sober reflection and the Digital World Standard Imagery -- which is the only imagery with the overlooking flats in Cottonwick Close.

May have to do another survey when it's lighter -- say nearer happy hour.
Hjart (2017-09-29 06:05:29+00:00): Hvad var ideen i at slette venstresvingsbanerne her?
Hjart (2017-09-29 06:07:29+00:00): Bemærk at der nu ikke længere er mulighed for at blive navigeret fra Ringvejen og til Vallensbækve/motorvejen
DK7080BE (2017-09-29 10:51:38+00:00): De to små vejstykker til og fra Vallensbækvej til "Link til primærvej" skal nok have fjernet ensretningerne, hvis navigationen skal virke.
Hjart (2017-09-29 11:12:35+00:00): Der er også stadig svingforbud (nogle af dem delvist ødelagte).
Jeg bider mærke i at gutten normalt redigerer i USA (og har lavet nogle ret unikke ting, som f.ek.s http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BjornRasmussen/diary/42345)
Man kan undre sig over at han pludselig redigerer her.
DK7080BE (2017-09-29 12:04:39+00:00): Mapningen i dette kryds bør rettes hurtigst muligt, for at undgå at der bliver fejl i oktober 2017-kortene til fx OSMAND og Mapfactor Navigator.
Hjart (2017-09-29 12:08:26+00:00): Jeg ruller tilbage så
Hjart (2017-09-29 12:33:06+00:00): Please note that we have reverted your changes here
GinaroZ (2017-09-29 13:04:46+00:00): Saw a picture on twitter with the bollards preventing car access so I've changed this to a cycleway
Chris Fleming (2017-09-29 22:06:03+00:00): thanks that's perfect. My source was on a cycling group on Facebook,
user_5359 (2017-09-30 07:25:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You delete only the name of the restaurant. Is there still a restaurant with a different name there and is the building empty?
FinnLarge (2017-09-30 15:20:06+00:00): Restaurant has closed. Building is empty.
user_5359 (2017-09-30 15:21:53+00:00): Thanks for information. I marked this node with disused:amenity=restaurant.
user_5359 (2017-09-30 07:23:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-08 18:15:33+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3510129 ?
neuhausr (2017-10-11 16:05:43+00:00): I noticed you didn't add any tags to the Waialea Fuelbreak like you did with the Waikoloa one--is there a reason for that?
HawaiiWildfire (2017-10-18 23:47:29+00:00): Was struggling with this one actually in terms of how to classify it. I haven't seen anything specific to fuelbreaks/firebreaks (other than emergency roads which can be a little different). The Waialea Firebreak is quite wide but also serves as a fire access road. Any suggestions how to approach this?
neuhausr (2017-10-19 13:50:13+00:00): Good question! I did find something on the wiki that might work: man_made=cutline, cutline=firebreak https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline  I doubt it'll be displayed on one of the "standard" maps, but it will be in the database and could be shown in a custom rendering.
kreuzschnabel (2017-10-24 19:13:57+00:00): Hallo, du hast an der Autobahnbrücke der A 67 ein maxheight=3.5 an die Autobahnteile gesetzt. Das bewirkt, dass alle LKW über 3,5 m Höhe von OSM-nutzenden Navis jetzt nicht über die Autobahn, sondern über Umwege geschickt werden! 

Höhenbeschränkungen bitte immer an die Straße taggen, für die sie gelten – also die, die unten durch geht. Wo es in diesem Fall schon seit 2,5 Jahren dransteht, deshalb hab ich’s auf den Autobahnstücken einfach wieder weggenommen.

Bitte aufpassen, dass keine solchen Fehler in unsere Daten kommen, schon gar nicht im Fernstraßennetz. OSM wird von vielen Anwendern ernsthaft zum Navigieren genutzt :)
smaprs (2017-09-29 03:35:24+00:00): Olá Ingrid, bem-vinda ao OSM. Uma sugestão, já que você marcou review_requested:  
para o local "Casa da Praça"  
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136384008),  
você pode usar talvez as tags:    
amenity=community_centre,  
+  
community_centre=cultural_centre  
Veja mais info em:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:amenity#Entretenimento  
Talvez uma destas tags, a que melhor servir.  
Att. Sérgio
neuhausr (2017-10-04 18:43:09+00:00): Welcome and thanks for adding to the map! One thing I'd recommend changing is the open area tagging (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528576060) from highway=footway to highway=pedestrian. Also for bonus points you could add type and/or capacity info to the bicycle parking :)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:21:11+00:00): Hello pushian. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528581266 you have tagged `sehlter` (misspelled). But i think it should be `covered`, right? 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-10-03 05:31:44+00:00): If possible, use more detailed comments on following edits. A short comment like one here is vague and useless, and may hide unconstructive map edits.
mueschel (2017-10-08 13:18:17+00:00): Hi,
please have a look to the tagging here, this tag doesn't make much sense:
"collection_times = Cigarette disposal"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136595692
Supaplex (2017-09-29 03:03:12+00:00): It is not properate to add this place as China own. The edit will be reverted.

這裡標示為中國所有並不適當。相關編輯會被回退。

这里标示为中国所有并不适当。相关编辑会被回退。
GerdP (2017-09-30 05:38:59+00:00): Hi!
I've noted that you created two ways with
the unusual tag highway=alley 
I changed them to highway=service + service=alley. 
You also added some tags with the tiger prefix. Did you get your information from tiger data? If not I would not use these tags.
indence (2017-09-30 17:26:36+00:00): #COMS2200A
mapper999 (2017-09-30 14:35:29+00:00): Hi,
please note that the correct syntax for lanes is access:lanes=*|* . I fixed it for these roads.
indence (2017-09-30 17:26:26+00:00): #COMS2200A
user_5359 (2017-09-30 07:14:38+00:00): Welcome  to OSM! Please don’t use abbreviation on street names!
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 07:42:42+00:00): Hello maria camila longo. With
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528626896
you have overlayed the other buildings. What do you want to achieve with this? Also `building:BLOCKS` would be a new and so far unkown key!
freebeer (2017-10-05 13:18:38+00:00): (begin snark)
actually, that's building:BLOKES, this being a UK british-english-language tagging scheme, and would mean 19 blokes, dudes, guys, whatever, reside there ;-)
(end meaningless and ignore-worthy irrelevant waste of your time)
tonyf1 (2017-10-01 00:12:14+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your OSM edit. You have left the changeset comment blank. It is important that your changeset comments give others sufficient information to understand your edits. Its good to include what you changed, why you changed it and your source of information. You have added 2 nodes, 5136822863, v1 has no tags. 5136822864, v1 is a guest house but it is in a car park and is an unlikely part of a hospital precinct?
woodpeck (2017-09-29 12:15:15+00:00): This changeset has accidentally broken the geometries https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485019675 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157366833 - they now look "blocky" and have many self-intersections. Can you repair this yourself or would you like help in reverting the edit?
raito (2017-09-29 12:59:00+00:00): @woodpeck I think it is rather this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52402340 that broke it, or the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52165496. 

This one with comment "validation" is probably trying to fix it but not properly.
woodpeck (2017-09-29 14:04:58+00:00): Indeed. I'll have a look at reverting these two landuse areas.
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2017-09-29 23:38:10+00:00): Hi woodpeck

I will check this changeset on Monday and repair the problem

Thank you
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2017-09-29 23:44:01+00:00): On the changeset, I was validated the infrastructures from survey data and delete import=yes from some line boundary administrative in the area.  I didn't changed the landuse, perhaps my team has changed the landuse and broke the landuse. Because we were working with some people for the area. 
But, I will check on the changeset and repair the problem. 

Thanks for your information,  it's very help.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-31 21:42:44+00:00): Até onde eu sei vias como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31565814/history não deveriam ser no máximo tertiary.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-31 21:43:37+00:00): melhorando: vias não pavimentadas deveriam ser no máximo tertiary.
BeKri (2017-09-30 00:06:04+00:00): Servus,
die Nummer ist seit 3 Jahren als Node vorhanden http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2515025293
Nimm Deine Nummrer bitte wieder raus, da doppelte Nummern unerwünscht sind.
Gruss derBeKri
naoliv (2017-10-10 07:22:54+00:00): Vitor, qual a razão de ter apagado essas vias daqui?
user_5359 (2017-09-30 07:09:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are not(!) a church.
nyuriks (2017-09-30 03:19:36+00:00): Hi, you removed wikidata tag from node 2179195588, is there an error with it?
Austin Zhu (2017-09-30 04:01:15+00:00): Sorry, I'll refill it!
Seandebasti (2017-11-12 17:51:54+00:00): local knowledge survey? vermesser?
TFTD (2017-11-12 20:55:25+00:00): Nein, ich bin kein Vermesser wenn das die Frage ist. Bin im Ingenieursbereich tätig.
user_5359 (2017-09-30 06:40:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately you have some trouble with your change (you move a node from Judio Road to the end of Volcano Road). I must revert your change.

Unfortunately, I don't quite understand your concern, otherwise I would have already helped you with the correct change.
Elliott Sewell (2017-10-01 16:40:29+00:00): This road is officially Volcano Road.  You have the name wrong, and Googe has the location wrong.  The map as it stands is correct.  The one and only name for this road is Volcano Road.  What is your problem?   Is this so hard to fix?
user_5359 (2017-10-01 16:44:38+00:00): Hello, I don't understand you. The way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16155135 is the Volcano Road! Or did you mean http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16155427 the Judio Road?
mavl (2017-09-29 16:59:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы скривили улицу Мельникайте и зачем-то превратили здание в парк. Насколько я знаю это здание существует. Пожалуйста, редактируйте данные аккуратнее и пишите понятные комментарии к пакетам правок.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
maraf24 (2017-09-29 21:07:06+00:00): Co to jest?
krokodyl (2017-10-17 05:24:21+00:00): UCHWAŁA NR LXXXI/1957/17 RADY MIASTA KRAKOWA z dnia 30 sierpnia 2017 roku
w sprawie zmian nazw ulic
dvdhoven (2017-09-30 10:57:03+00:00): stop positions verplaatst
user_5359 (2017-09-29 16:57:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footpath with the existing highways. And the name of the footway isn’t the street name with the postfix Sidewalk.
eggie (2017-09-29 17:47:05+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-29 17:51:26+00:00): Hier zit wel erg veel aan elkaar geplakt. wegen en landuse. Ik ga er even naar kijken.
Dit zijn geen beginnersklussen.