piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_1566574 (2021-09-09 21:26:49+00:00): Salut !
Ça ne serait pas préférable de déplacer les attributs depuis https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83703879 vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944610802 (en supprimant landuse=education au passage) ?

Merci d'avance ! :)
FbrG (2021-05-20 19:16:00+00:00): Warum hast du das Schild gelöscht? Gestern war es noch da...
willisturm (2021-05-21 07:35:04+00:00): Hi,
tut mir leid, ist mir passiert. Jetzt ist das Verkehrszeichen wieder da. Aber highway=traffic_sign ist nicht erforderlich, traffic_sign=* reicht völlig. Außerdem solltest Du die Restriction berichtigen, die wird hier auf einem Node falsch verwendet.
FbrG (2021-05-26 22:02:05+00:00): Hi, kein Ding :)
Danke für den Hinweis bzgl. der Abbiegebeschränkung, ich hab mal nachgeschaut. Die ist hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9716734) bereits als Relation dargestellt. Allerdings wird sie von https://maps.openrouteservice.org/ ignoriert, OSMand erkennt sie aber. Die momentane Implementierung ist schon korrekt, oder?
willisturm (2021-05-27 07:48:14+00:00): Hi,
sieht sehr gut aus.
Schönen Tag noch.
sskalyan (2021-05-20 15:42:05+00:00): Hi,

Hope you are doing well. 
Sign board says "no motor vehicles accept for access" ideal access tag in this case should be motor_vehicle=destination. Please refer to this wiki for more details. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. We have modified motor vehicle access in this changeset: 105038296

Thanks,
Kalyan
NastassiaKalesnikava (2021-05-21 12:28:13+00:00): Hi
I got acquainted with the OSM Wiki and will take it into account in the future. 
Thank you for such note and fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104953477
bxl-forever (2021-05-25 23:49:01+00:00): Hello,

Your latest changes are interesting.
Do I understand you are importing the same shapes as defined by Brussels Region?  e.g. here: https://data.mobility.brussels/en/info/urbadm_md/
It might be nice to have those on the map.

Just one thing: if you want to draw the perimeter for your boundary, you can create a long line—or smaller lines—along existing roads instead of splitting existing ways to make it fit. (Splitting ways in iD, especially when there are existing relations on it, causes a lot of damage.)
JhowieNitnek (2021-05-26 08:04:17+00:00): Hello,
Yes I am indeed doing that. What do you mean with "a long line"?
bxl-forever (2021-05-26 10:37:20+00:00): Hello,

I mean you can draw a new line to join several existing nodes and create the perimeter you want.
Then, you use this line in your new "boundary" relation.

It does not have to be one single line.  It can be a collection of several lines if you prefer.
An example here, made with 7 lines: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7052716

This avoids destroying bus or cycle route relations every time you use the "split" function in the iD editor. (The online editor on the osm.org website is a rather basic tool aimed to be used for simple stuff and not suited for complicated structures, and it does not warn you about corrupted data.)
UrSuS (2021-07-30 09:13:08+00:00): Kas te par svistu pievinots? 12 marsruts tur neiet
Keima (2021-05-20 12:07:47+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est bien un vendeur récurrent du marché? Si oui je pense que le tag "street_vendor=yes" pourrait être pertinent (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes).
Qu'en pensez-vous?

Cordialement,
RemiCH (2021-05-20 12:14:47+00:00): Bonjour,
oui c'est un vendeur récurent, présent chaque semaine sur le marché.
Je débute sur OSM merci pour cette information !

Cordialement
Keima (2021-05-20 12:23:44+00:00): Merci de votre réponse et bonne continuation dans OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
eggie (2021-05-19 12:11:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Zo te zien staat de naam 	European Patent Office - al meerdere keren op de kaart vermeld.
Zelfs op het terrein zelf.
Je zou ook description kunnen gebruiken ipv name=
New Main Building zal niet de naam zijn van het gebouw.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-19 13:49:46+00:00): Op adresnode 3 staat ook European Patent Office - Main Building
Wellicht nog een keer kijken naar je edits, want dit is wel overdaad.
mvg
eggie
NellieCr (2021-05-21 15:29:28+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Bedankt voor de reacties en de uitvoerige hulp. Ik kijk ernaar uit me erin te verdiepen!
rab (2021-05-19 14:55:18+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#18/-15.3203/28.2323&num=2&mt0=mapnik&mt1=google-satellite

Hello,
we are not allowed to use Google (link above) as a source for our maps. But I think you can use it to learn how fast African cities change. You can't draw a perfect map, once for all time. Instead of guessing, it's much better to come back regularly. And only draw in or change things you are pretty sure about. Nobody would build two expensive bridges to cross a stupid dirt road in a poor country like this.
FreedSky (2021-05-23 14:08:54+00:00): s49 是高速
FreedSky (2021-05-23 15:34:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121153823/history 建议你自己去看看这条路还在不？
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-28 15:57:55+00:00): Bonjour,
quels sotn les horaires du lundi matin ? il en est question dans la description.
Peut-on se baser sur les horaires "covid ?" <- à effacer je pense d'ailleurs
Ser9ei (2021-05-19 14:16:34+00:00): Указание города внутри границ НП избыточно. Он наследуется автоматически: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
manoj@123 (2021-05-19 12:24:19+00:00): Here, I fixed road geometry with the source of Bing aerial imagery.
user_5359 (2021-05-21 05:24:06+00:00): Hello! Please see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105011874. Did you really use data from other maps (see "source_nam"="Army Topo Map", I read "source"="Army Topo Map" ).
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:15:15+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:42:25+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:41:17+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
jeis_BKG (2021-05-20 06:27:41+00:00): Hallo mmas_BKG,
müsste hier nicht der amenity=school tag drin bleiben? Der sollte eigentlich mit dem tag school=elementary kombiniert werden, ggf. kannst Du school=elementary zu isced:level=1 korrigieren.
Viele Grüße,
Joachim (jeis_BKG ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104961117
mmas_BKG (2021-05-20 06:40:01+00:00): Hallo jeis_BKG, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe isced_level = 1 anstelle von school = elementary hinzugefügt. Auch die Amenity habe ich noch hinzugefügt. 
Viele Grüße,
mmas_BKG
Olga | Yanosik (2022-02-14 10:31:24+00:00): Witam, dostałam wiadomość od kierowcy, że to nie jest rondo. Również zdjęcia na to nie wskazują. Skąd taka edycja?
Fasha4 (2022-02-14 12:23:11+00:00): Chociażby dlatego: "realizacja skrzyżowania DW 435 z ul. Oleską i ul. Katowicką oraz Rataja i Kusocińskiego w jedno zintegrowane skrzyżowanie z wyspą centralną i wykorzystaniem wewnętrznych powierzchni akumulacyjnych dla relacji skrętnych" (za: https://mzd.opole.pl/poprawa-funkcjonowania-systemu-transportu-publicznego-oraz-zastosowanie-rozwiazan-zwiekszajacych-bezpieczenstwo-ruchu-drogowego-w-obrebie-stacji-kolejowej-opole-wschod/).
Ale faktycznie ten zapis nie musi oznaczać ronda. Też na zdjęciach nie widzę nigdzie takiego znaku, ale trzeba wziąć poprawkę na to, że jest to w dalszym ciągu teren budowy i co chwilę mogą dołożyć taki znak. Na razie jest to skrzyżowanie tylko przejezdne. W środę tam podjadę i jeżeli nie będzie tam znaku C-12, to usunę tag 'junction=roundabout'.
habi (2021-05-21 07:53:32+00:00): Ciao nicojp

In this changeset you added nodes with several not understandable tags, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8745859332 with 
--
id=node/5841511660
internet_1=no
internet_a=wlan
--
Can you explain your reasoning?
It seems that you want to link one node with another.
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-05-21 07:56:09+00:00): And you duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8745859336, which already existed as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701364876 since about four years.
What's the reason behind this?
habi (2021-05-21 07:57:14+00:00): You also duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8745859340/history from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278875891/history
habi (2021-05-21 07:58:47+00:00): Most of the data added is just a duplicate of what was already present.
I think this changeset should be reverted...
habi (2021-05-21 08:15:43+00:00): *And* introduced tag typos like `opening_ho=24/7` for node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8745859331 which itself duplicates https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6388683286/.
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:12:26+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:13:11+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:13:29+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
user_5359 (2021-05-21 14:37:08+00:00): Work errors happen, but unfortunately we cannot decide what is duplicate and what is new without extensive individual checking. Do you agree if we completely roll back all changes marked with #CartONG#Projet_Carto_Goma_RDC?
nicojp (2021-05-21 16:30:41+00:00): Yes. Go for a removal of everything that is #CartONG#Projet_Carto_Goma_RDC I'll start sending again but only new points
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:44:23+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
Rostaman521 (2021-06-29 23:25:02+00:00): Ul. Frana Krste Frankopana je na Folki kod džamije. Koliko ja znam ova se baš zove "Frankopanska ulica"
Janjko (2021-06-30 15:10:36+00:00): Može nisam znao. Malo mi je glupo da imamo dvije ulice nazvane po istom čovjeku.
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:39:58+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
Ser9ei (2021-05-19 14:13:34+00:00): Садовая улица 10 литБ в housenumber - это вполне соответствует https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses Зачем убирать литеру?
Diógenes de Sinope (2021-05-19 15:02:06+00:00): 👍🏼
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:39:16+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
j numminen (2021-05-19 13:59:32+00:00): This is vandalism and needs to be reverted. The name and ref changes are incorrect.
Larmax (2021-05-19 16:31:41+00:00): Reverted.
user_5359 (2021-05-21 05:01:11+00:00): Hello (again!) 
You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning(!) of the keys.
alt_name_e	Pallotines
classifica	catholic
denominati	catholic
full_id	n5243251821
name_en	Pallottine Fathers
osm_id	5243251821
osm_type	node
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:15:43+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:38:14+00:00): reverted! see https://www.osm.org/changeset/104961443
marczoutendijk (2022-04-26 18:35:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371908500
leisure=*
Was soll das bedeuten?
mueschel (2021-05-21 08:46:31+00:00): Hi,
all the objects you added here are duplicates of already existing objects.

This happens to different people every now and then.
Could you explain your workflow? If we can figure out how this happens we might be able to prevent it in the future.
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:11:45+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
mueschel (2021-05-21 10:16:52+00:00): Thanks for the explanation!
I think the easiest is to delete the objects from this changeset. 
Then you can redo the changes on the original objects.

There shouldn't be any issues if you download data either directly in JOSM or via overpass-turbo. They all keep the references to existing objects intact so that no duplicates are created.
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:21:31+00:00): OK. Could you do the delete?
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:30:43+00:00): Can you delete only the double points.  The points i have created are single and so they are right
mueschel (2021-05-21 10:35:03+00:00): Done.
user_5359 (2021-05-21 05:51:40+00:00): Hello (again!) Only for an example: You add the node inside of the existing area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193376106. 
Why you didn't add this information to well known object (see added information)?
Why did you use a misspelled key?
By the way: Even with correct spelling, the use is hardly in the sense of the documented definition.
* Please clean up the duplicates 
* please use the keys and values in correct notation
* please document your sources
nicojp (2021-05-21 10:14:49+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry for the problems I caused but I can explain the reason.
I needed data for a personal project under Qgis.
I exported this data using different tools: BBBike, Overpass turbo, Geofabrik.
But, I completed my data by adding a number of POI's that I found in the field and that were missing in OSM.
As I thought it was a pity that these new points were not in OSM, I sent all my data using JOSM.
This upload consisted of the imported data plus the points I had created.
I probably shouldn't have done this and I apologize.
It is not me who created the bad tags that are reported to me: they were present in the data that I imported initially.
Feel free to delete anything you think is wrong: duplicates, bad tags.
I hope my explanations are clear. I will proceed differently next time by importing only the new points I have created.
nicojp



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:35:18+00:00): reverted! see https://www.osm.org/changeset/104961443
streckenkundler (2021-05-19 14:16:55+00:00): Hei,

Ich hab hier mal das ganze Schulgelände zu amenity gemacht und nicht nur das einzelne von euch erfasste Gebäude. Dieses Gebäude und die nordweslichen Anbauten ist die Schule. Das wiederum nordwestlich angrenzende Gebäude ist die Turnhalle der Schule. Wenn ich mir das überlege, bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob nicht auch das Gebäude in der Cottbusser Straße 26A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387434770 nicht auch noch mit dazu gehört. früheer gehörte das mit zur Schule.

Sven
pitbiker_BKG (2021-05-20 10:15:23+00:00): Hallo Streckenkundler,
wir haben bei unseren Recherchen nach Schulen im Internet diese Schule gefunden. Da wir hier in Frankfurt am Main sitzen und keine Ortkenntnis besitzen, haben wir sie nur über die Adresse das Gebäude zu ordnen können. 
Wir hatten die Hoffnung dass jemand vor Ort mit Ortskenntnis die weitere Detailierung übernimmt, was du ja übernommen hast.
Vielen Dank
Pitbiker
streckenkundler (2021-05-20 16:36:29+00:00): Hei,

Ja, dein Edit erinnerte mich daran, das nun endlich mal zu erledigen :) Das hatte ich viel zu lange aufgeschoben und dann vergessen... Ein zweites Areal hier in Lübben habe ich auch endlich mal separiert: die evangelische Grundschule... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104969811

So macht das Spaß...

Sven
streckenkundler (2021-05-20 16:48:04+00:00): Ach noch vergessen... für Brandenburg sind die Geodaten für OSM freigeben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Berlin zum Teil auch... 

Sven
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 13:04:45+00:00): Hello 제이제이 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do try and use descriptive changeset comments in your changesets.  Here you've used "#msfk#msfk21", which is just some letters and numbers that no-one will be able to understand.  If what you're doing is "adding some buildings in Somalia using aerial imagery" then say that - it'll help people to understand what you're doing, and will help people to help you if something goes wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions - please ask!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 13:04:50+00:00): 제이 제이 여러분 안녕하세요, OpenStreetMap에 오신 것을 환영합니다!
변경 세트에 설명적인 변경 세트 주석을 사용하십시오. 여기에서는 아무도 이해할 수없는 문자와 숫자 인 "# msfk # msfk21"을 사용했습니다. 당신이하고있는 일이 "항공 사진을 사용하여 소말리아에 건물을 추가하는 것"이라면 이렇게 말하세요. 사람들이 당신이하고있는 일을 이해하는 데 도움이되며, 무언가 잘못되었을 때 사람들이 당신을 도울 수 있도록 도와 줄 것입니다.
친애하는,
앤디
PS : 질문이 있으시면 물어보세요!
user_5359 (2021-05-22 02:30:45+00:00): reverted! see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104961443
DressyPear4 (2021-05-19 13:26:44+00:00): Olá, as vias estão visíveis nas imagens de satélite, se não é permitido veículos apenas coloque apenas  "motor_vehicle=no"
veja mais em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
não delete as vias existentes
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104963573
jeis_BKG (2021-05-20 06:10:32+00:00): Hi mluk_BKG,
kannst Du Deinen Key alt_name in old_name ändern? Dann ist unser Tagging einheitlich.
Danke fürs Mappen,
Joachim (jeis_BKG ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104963651
mluk_BKG (2021-05-20 06:48:10+00:00): Hi Joachim,
in diesem Fall habe ich alt_name genutzt, weil der Tag bei der Schule in Heiligendorf auch so verwendet wurde. Bin auch davon ausgegangen, dass der Name wirklich noch als alternativer Name genutzt wird.

Es stimmt natürlich auch, dass die Schulen vor dem Zusammenschluss 2013/14 Grundschule Hattorf und Heiligendorf hießen, dann würde old_name passen.
In diesem Fall würde ich dann bei beiden Schulen 'alt' zu 'old' ändern.
jeis_BKG (2021-05-20 06:56:01+00:00): Du hast vollkommen recht, guter Edit!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104963651
Keima (2021-05-19 15:25:27+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous avez contribué à OpenStreetMap pour la première fois aujourd’hui, félicitation et bienvenue! Je vous invite à lire ce message: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

En relisant votre groupe de modification j'ai remarqué que sur le cours d'eau vous avez ajouté "tidal=no". (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159224496#map=15/48.2560/-0.3676) Si je ne me trompe pas cela fait référence à des bords de mers, ce qui n'est pas le cas ici. Est-ce bien ce que vous avez voulu faire?

Cordialement,
Keima (2021-05-20 11:30:26+00:00): Bonjour,

En modifiant l'indication des magasins directement dans les attributs du bâtiment par un nœud à l'intérieur de celui-ci vous avez supprimé "building=yes" pour celui-ci: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152577225 Est-ce que cela était ce que vous vouliez faire?

Cordialement,
RemiCH (2021-05-20 12:23:03+00:00): Bonjour,

je voulais changer l'affectation du magasin pour qu'il soit identifié comme un nœud et non comme un bâtiment. Cependant, je ne voulais pas supprimer le bâtiment...
Je viens de corriger. Merci

Cordialement
Lachgast (2021-05-29 23:49:25+00:00): Naar aanleiding van je forumbericht ben ik 'ns gaan koekeloeren wat je allemaal doet. Ziet er goed uit, JJJWegdam! Bedankt voor alle inzet.
Flynn Marquardt (2021-05-20 17:19:12+00:00): The lst change created an invalid border of Guinea Ecuatorial and Gabon. Please use the verify/check button in JOSM to see the overlapping end of the border (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104965120?xhr=1#map=18/1.67360/11.34696) and try to fix the problem.