piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mebrau_UT (2020-12-13 10:14:37+00:00): Taking this changeset as example for all your changes to contact again. See the changes I have made to your mappings here: http://www.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95749232 and see how the shape of your buildings is not reflected in the reality of how buildings are shaped. See your private message for more information to why I reverted your mapped buildings. I hope you are not discouraged by these messages, but we need to ensure the quality of the data we contribute. Thanks!
mebrau_UT (2020-12-20 23:22:50+00:00): I decided to not delete your buildings after all  - so I reverted my changeset where I deleted them and updated the building geometries. You can view those here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96157468
Corrales86 (2020-12-17 01:41:54+00:00): Rund um Götzenkirchen ist diese Version der Route vom alten Startpunkt aus kommend noch beschildert. Daher eher abandoned:
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 14:29:39+00:00): Hello NFZANMNIM,
Just for info, it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875405232/history was added by someone accused of fictional mapping (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11940952 ) who I'm now reverting. This might just be fiction, not even "proposed".
Best Regards,
Andy, from the DWG
20180911 (2021-01-15 14:05:12+00:00): Ciao scratera,
Cosa vuoi dire con generator:capacity?
Perché hai cambiato il tag generator:output:electricity da 2 MW a 100000 senza aggiungere una unità?
Saluti, Mark
scratera (2021-01-15 14:46:13+00:00): sto usando il preimpostato Power Line Mapping  presente in josm ed è la capacita produttiva del generatore dove un grupo a 18mw e l'altro ne a 2mw in questo caso
20180911 (2021-01-15 14:58:45+00:00): Allora deviamo ponere generator:output:electricity=2 MW e generator:output:electricity=18 MW.

Se usa con un " ": "2 MW" e non "2MW", vedi anche https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/generator%3Aoutput%3Aelectricity#values

Penso che possiamo eliminare generator:capacity perché questo è già espresso con generator:output:electricity.
Recoil16 (2020-12-14 01:13:07+00:00): Hallo zelsis,
ich wollte mal gefragt haben, nach welchem Standard Du hier bei gemeinsam von Fahrradfahren und Fußgängern genutzen Wegen von path auf cycleway umtaggst (beispiel w34961052), meines Wissens ist highway=path hier die korrekte Nutzung.
Grüße Moritz
zelsis (2020-12-14 16:46:44+00:00): Moin,
ich habe einfach nur im ID-Editor als Typ "Rad- und Fußweg" ausgewählt und bin davon ausgegangen, dass das dann schon stimmen sollte.
Recoil16 (2020-12-14 16:51:13+00:00): Ich verstehe, iD macht also mal wieder Unsinn. Ich werde die entsprechenden Wege wieder auf highway=path abändern, wenn Dich das nicht stört (Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath).
Grüße
zelsis (2020-12-14 17:02:53+00:00): Ok, kein Problem. Danke.
b-holdet (2021-06-28 11:18:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2732233
parsd51 (2021-06-28 11:27:53+00:00): Tak for tippet :-)
Ja, det er en fejl. Jeg retter den.
GinaroZ (2020-12-11 17:33:25+00:00): You've changed a number of roads to paths - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71742345 - please be more careful when editing in future.
malca (2021-07-09 04:02:53+00:00): Please reconsider your deletion of that small run of Trelew street on Zelarrayan. If you walk to that site you will see there is at least one house with  Zelarrayan address, and you can ask the neighbor across about issues they have with MBB about using front yard space that is reserved for future opening of that street.
https://www.google.com/maps/@-38.7088594,-62.2750562,3a,75y,50.71h,86.93t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1seAsa3NH-gok7YV7_MGnxjA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DeAsa3NH-gok7YV7_MGnxjA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D11.7166395%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
whb (2021-01-11 10:48:00+00:00): Das von dir kürzlich eingetragene Luisen Krankenhaus wurde wahrscheinlich schon 2016 geschlossen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2493754
whb (2021-01-11 10:48:57+00:00): Guten Tag,

bist du dir sicher, dass das Elisabethen Krankenhaus dort existiert bzw. jemals existiert hat?
fabiotofy (2020-12-16 19:30:46+00:00): Sicuro ? Perché da delibera ufficiale del Comune di Majano il vecchio civico 64 della frazione Sant'Eliseo passa come via della fornace 4. FRAZ. S.ELISEO	62 -> VIA DELLA FORNACE 4
Molinaro Maurizio (2020-12-16 20:26:41+00:00): Buonasera fabiotofy, si sono sicuro, perchè ci abito!
Via Pers comincia dall'incrocio con via Farla vicino cimitero e fa tutto il tratto a sx come modificato. Devo finire di controllare i civici
Nikpap (2020-12-16 19:08:22+00:00): Thank you for adding those. Keep up the good work!
Heinz_V (2020-12-12 06:38:53+00:00): I am still waiting that you begin to make corrections according to my changeset comments.
Flynn Marquardt (2020-12-11 21:51:51+00:00): Hi,

after your last change the border of Iowa and Missouri do not close anymore: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/161638#map=15/40.3991/-91.4913

Now these borders cannot be used e.g. for reverse geocoding anymore ...

Either one way is missing or superflous - can you please fix that?
ianturo (2020-12-11 16:45:16+00:00): https://twitter.com/EDUMedellin/status/1331346665635241984/photo/1
mariotomo (2020-12-12 22:00:57+00:00): hola. qué es lo que estás haciendo?
ivanbranco (2020-12-11 16:58:31+00:00): Ho selezionato la richiesta di review per sbaglio.
ianturo (2020-12-11 17:05:52+00:00): https://twitter.com/EDUMedellin/status/1321799278986252289
SekeRob (2020-12-11 17:22:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. You need to qualify the line you drew with an additional tag like highway=path, pedestrian street, sidewalk.footway, then continue the line to the next point, maybe the garden grounds there (which could be mapped too) else there's no routing. Think also a No exit belongs at the end of Via Umbria, which is dead end.
cheers
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-12 10:38:58+00:00): Hi Gabriel,

As always your enthusiasm is appreciated, however, I believe these kinds of changes have been discussed with you before and reverted multiple times.

Discussions have occurred on the following changesets among others:
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/70158664
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/70158004
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/69997325

The entire grounds in these situations have been confirmed to be the property/grounds of the schools in question, including via emails to the Baltimore County parks department which has confirmed that schools grounds are indeed operated by the schools in question (such as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70094413)

I really appreciate your enthusiasm when it comes to helping your local Pokemon GO community, but I can assure you that this is not the best way to go about things, and that your incorrect or false changes will be reverted.

As always, please feel free to reach out if you need help making legitimate changes to the map.

Best,

Wood.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-11 23:34:33+00:00): reverted
AjBelnuovo (2021-01-19 23:17:52+00:00): A Avenida Garcilio da Costa Ferreira tem as duas vias com mão de direção no mesmo sentido ?
EneaSuper (2020-12-12 12:24:34+00:00): Ciao, temo tu abbia impostato male il tag "start_date".
mascalzone67 (2020-12-12 12:55:49+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione. Corretta. Buona giornata.
VictorIE (2023-07-12 11:21:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6515322281/history

Is this the correct wiki? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Hannon
b-unicycling (2023-07-12 14:48:28+00:00): i doubt it.
eggie (2020-12-11 18:27:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review..  Je vraagt om feedback..  Wat was je edit / bedoeling? Je hebt een node toegevoegd. 
What was your edit?
Your comment is 'marwa'?
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-12 15:02:59+00:00): Hallo west89,

OpenStreetMap nutzt englische Tagwerte. Anstatt der Farbe "Weiß" sollte also "white" verwendet werden.

Das betrifft:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8220390335
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8220390336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8220383501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8220397165

Deine Werte für den ref-Tag der oben genannte Punkte erscheinen mir zudem eher eine Beschreibung zu sein als ein Referenzcode oder?
Beim letzten Punkt genügt für den utility-Tag der Wert "telecom". Die anderen Werte sind erstens deutsch und zweitens nicht etabliert. 

Mehr dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:utility

Bei Fragen kannst du diese natürlich gerne stellen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
west89 (2020-12-28 22:45:01+00:00): Der Ref-Tag ist die Kennzeichnug  des Stromanbieter.

Viele Grüße
west89
eggie (2020-12-11 18:38:50+00:00): Dag Arichikato.. Waarom nodes op de knooppuntroute 40-77 met de tag network:type	= node_network?
Verder zit op de hoek van het veld  een node met name=22 Geen idee waard die vandaan komt. Denk dat die wel weg kan.

Verder goed bezig zie ik.. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95696774

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2020-12-11 18:55:53+00:00): 'k Zie veel meer van die name=  (nummer) ?
Geen idee wat de functie is.
sport=hockey heb ik veranderd in field_hockey. De pitches heb ik even losgemaakt van elkaar. 

MVG,
eggie
Arichikato (2020-12-11 19:05:02+00:00): He Eggie,

Bedankt voor je oplettendheid.
Heb ik een bestaande fietsroute opgeknipt met het toevoegen van de parkeerplaats van het zwembad?
eggie (2020-12-11 19:15:29+00:00): Er lopen twee wandelroutes , maar die zijn nog helemaal intact.
Je voegt alleen op node network:type=node_network.. 'k Vroeg me af wat de bedoeling is?
Dat zijn toch geen knoppunten.. of zijn daar bordjes gekomen met een knooppuntnummer?
gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-11 19:16:13+00:00): > typo knooppunten ..  De o stopt er bij mij mee.
Arichikato (2020-12-11 19:52:37+00:00): Okee, zijn inderdaad geen bordjes, maar ik zag vgm aan de zuidzijde van het sportcentrum zon knooppunt staan. Dus ik dacht dat het een toevoeging was waar twee routes elkaar kruizen.
eggie (2020-12-11 22:04:42+00:00): De nodes zonder verdere functie heb ik even leeggemaakt. 
De nodes verbonden met de omtrek leisure= sports_centre met alleen een name=nummer heb ik ook verwijderd. De voorgaande mapper mapt al jaren niet meer. 
gr eggie
amnmalik (2021-01-25 06:36:32+00:00): Is coal extractive a mine? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial%3Dmine
VictorIE (2020-12-21 02:40:02+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

I see that you have been making quite a few changes. It might be better to restrict change sets ('saves') to smaller geographic areas and/or single topics.

Could I ask what this line represents? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=773119702
Vinber (2020-12-12 15:52:45+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu sur OpenStreetMap !
il semble y avoir un doublon de Sierra Damos non ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95697265#map=19/43.94878/0.24659

Dispo pour discuter de tout cela,
Bonne cartographie
webmaster-gers-net (2020-12-12 16:24:21+00:00): Difficile de faire autrement pour citer deux objets différents situés sur ce lieu "Sierra Damos".
Dites-moi s'i y a une meilleure solution
Vinber (2020-12-12 17:16:29+00:00): désolé, effectivement, je n'avais pas vu que c'était caractérisé comme 2 objets différents avec le même nom :(
stillhart (2024-01-31 19:45:15+00:00): Hey. Du scheinst einiges an genauer Arbeit in Elm geleistet zu haben. Coole Sache, alles so schön gemappt :-)
BAK365 (2024-02-01 15:10:03+00:00): Danke! Wennschon dennschon, mir liegt viel an guter Datenqualität. Genauigkeit gehört da dazu, sonst lohnt sich der ganze Aufwand nicht.
pio2_122 (2020-12-11 19:25:20+00:00): OSM to nie miejsce na prywatne notatki...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95697699
MrMoehritz (2020-12-12 19:54:55+00:00): Hi Aljosa Cekic, willkommen bei OSM. Der edit sieht gut aus. nur eine Frage: du hast keine Rolle zu diesem Weg hinzugefügt (was nicht unbedingt falsch ist), alle anderen Abschnitte haben eine  Rolle. Ist die Umleitung denn in beide Richtungen gedacht oder nur in eine?
Aljosa Cekic (2021-01-13 10:40:57+00:00): Hi Mr Moehritz, Dankeschön. Das stimmt, dass ich keine Rolle zu diesem Weg gegeben habe. Für mich ist wichtig, dass die Umleitung U 21 (A 656) vollständig erfasst ist. Ich denke, dass diesen Weg in beide Richtungen gedacht ist, weil falls nicht, andere Verbindungen zu diesem Weg nicht funktionieren werden. Aber ich betone, dass ich mit diesem Stuck "gespielt habe", um ganz Umleitung funktionell zu machen.
flohoff (2020-12-13 13:53:41+00:00): Moin,
schöne änderung ;) Da wird aber noch ein Haus gebaut - Ich wohne keine 200m weit von dem ehemaligen Epke gelände weg mittlerweile ;)

Da sind ja hinten 5 Häuser entstanden und vorne wird auch noch überbaut.

Flo

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95698057
eggie (2020-12-11 19:09:50+00:00): Beste Arichikato

Parkeerplaatsen langs de straat beter niet als parkeerterreinen mappen.
Dat kan beter op een andere manier.
Zelf gebruik ik parking:lane: right / left / both = parallel of perpendicular
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
Die tags neem je op in de hoofdrijbaan.
Er lopen nu ook andere voorstellen .. zie Forum OSM.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-11 19:17:39+00:00): Hier even dat voorstel dat er loopt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking%3Dstreet_side

Het zijn in ieder geval geen amenity=parking
Arichikato (2020-12-11 22:08:19+00:00): Hey Eggie,

Bedankt voor de tip, ben inderdaad net begonnen, dus schoonheidsfoutjes zijn snel gemaakt. ik had ze in dit geval gemarkeerd omdat het bij een buurthuis/openbaar gebouw bevindt.

Ik ga niet elke parkeerplaats lopen mappen hoor :)
MrMoehritz (2020-12-12 19:57:50+00:00): Hallo Aljosa Cekic,
der edit sieht gut aus. Relationen sind ja gar nicht so einfach ;-)
Aljosa Cekic (2021-01-13 10:42:35+00:00): Vielen Dank für Ihre Kommentar
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-01-23 14:11:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883906061#map=19/51.32985/3.24282 is een leuke doorsteek! DIt soort paadjes heeft erg veel meerwaarde voor routeplanning van fietsers en voetgangers
Seandebasti (2021-08-20 10:03:28+00:00): hi thanks for add this data, which  source ist this?
SK53 (2020-12-11 20:44:37+00:00): Dear TL5100,

You have only made a small number of edits but a surprising large proportion have been seriously problematic. 

This is one step beyond: deleting a prominent London building from a database used by millions of people is vandalistic behaviour.

Please desist from this type of edit in the future. The data when changed is immediately available to everyone: you are not manipulating a private copy.

Yours,

SK53
SK53 (2020-12-11 20:47:12+00:00): This changeset was reverted by woodpeck at 08:43 UTC in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95702383
literan (2020-12-12 10:20:13+00:00): приветствую! Озон это не почта (т.к. там нельзя отправлять посылки, письма и т.п.), а shop=outpost. Ну и название у него не аббревиатура, поэтому пишется Ozon. Я исправил.
augxcgrwxo (2020-12-12 13:06:05+00:00): Спасибо) я увидел СДЭК рядом, с него сделал копию. СДЭК потом исправлю.
literan (2020-12-12 20:19:50+00:00): а в СДЭКах как раз обычно можно почту отправлять, так что оно именно пост оффисе
Trevor_1 (2020-12-11 23:38:31+00:00): I reverted these edits. You appear to be adding extra roads wherer they already exist.  There is a group for Panama on Telegram: t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
mariotomo (2020-12-12 20:29:38+00:00): thank you 1T-money for reverting this, but what would you think of letting this group complete their self-appointed-task of producing useless geographic information, and to fix it once they're gone.  otherwise we're letting them define our agenda.  they have made their point, not to discuss their actions with the community.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-12 20:38:16+00:00): I don't know, I think it might be better to revert any new changesets with the tag "Youthmappers" as soon as we can, so they don't do more damage. But I haven't reverted any since yesterday because I haven't seen any today
Trevor_1 (2020-12-12 20:39:46+00:00): *any new ones
mariotomo (2020-12-12 23:48:10+00:00): their preferred communication way is on the HOT tasking manager.  you could think of undoing their "close this task" action, if you think they're not done, or that they produced low quality data.
literan (2020-12-12 10:18:03+00:00): да котлован закопали уже, через пару недель открытие ))
solenoid jam (2020-12-13 06:36:47+00:00): Вот и введем котлован в эксплуатацию )
А у нас есть еще какие то источники данных для отрисовки станций?
literan (2020-12-13 11:36:35+00:00): проекты, выкладываемые на сайте госзакупок. Копать надо на "Нашем транспорте"
literan (2020-12-13 21:27:02+00:00): https://zen.yandex.ru/media/russos/probnyi-poezd-na-stancii-metro-elektrozavodskaia-5fd3643633ed420c3f6eb99c

ну какой там нафиг котлован)
gpstracks (2020-12-12 07:32:38+00:00): Hi.
Please, stop adding unexisting "name" tags to paths and tracks.
Thank You.
DressyPear4 (2020-12-13 04:28:28+00:00): Olá, essas vias que passam pelas lavouras não servem para roteamento de veiculos em geral, logo seria melhor rebaixá-las para vias agrícolas (highway=track)
n2m (2020-12-11 20:02:45+00:00): Shumë poligone janë të mbivendosura, kalimet e këmbësorëve nuk janë uniforme, trotuaret në disa vende të mbivendosur e shumë probleme të tjera të vogla që munda ti hetoj përgjatë rrugës që rregullova.
n2m (2020-12-11 20:15:55+00:00): It literally took me a couple of hours just to get this 3 km stretch of road somewhat in order. Please guys don't just add data, make sure they are accurate (geometry and tags) or don't add at all!
NSiecw (2020-12-22 00:56:04+00:00): A few of your edits have added paths that don't exist?
user_12328418 (2022-01-20 19:04:31+00:00): Ein Bahnsteig ist pt=platform, dieser liegt auf einem hw=footway. Wenn iD so etwas macht sollte es gemeldet werden.

Einfach einmal nachlesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:public%20transport?uselang=de#Plattformen
ElliottPlack (2021-11-16 19:16:38+00:00): Denny, what is the source for the bicycle restriction? The bridges are part of the bicycle route the East Coast Greenway, so bicycle permission is granted by SC DOT. Do you know differently?
Denney448 (2021-11-16 19:52:54+00:00): Elliott, There is a proposed third bridge that is currently being evaluated for construction that will be for pedestrician and bike traffic. Currently bike traffic happens on a raised shoulder of the bridge that is about 1'-6" wide and you have to dismount because there is about a 2' drop off at either end of the bridge. Source - I go across this bridge daily
ElliottPlack (2021-11-16 20:24:47+00:00): Thank you for this information! I looked at some street view and this does look like a treacherous place to ride or walk, no arguments there. On OSM however, the bicycle=no tag indicates a legal/posted restriction, not  that this is dangerous to ride. OpenStreetMap does not currently have a great means of tagging highways where bicycle or pedestrian access is allowed but dangerous or unsafe. It is something the community has discussed over on the OSMUS Slack, bicycle channel https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H

I'd encourage your participation if interested. 

Looks like a ped/bike bridge is sorely needed here, by the way. I would hope that once opened, SC DOT would mark the bridges as ped/bike prohibited and we could restore the bicycle=no tagging, but for now, absent any legal posted restriction, we've got to keep the bicycle=yes tag.

Here you can see the ECG official map showing the crossing and a recommendation to use caution: https://map.greenway.org/?loc=17,32.78120,-79.96015
Trevor_1 (2020-12-11 23:56:10+00:00): I'm reverting this and other Youthmappers changesets because they have too many errors. There is a group for Panama on Telegram. It's t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama, if you want to join.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-11 23:54:18+00:00): I'm reverting this and other Youthmappers changesets because they have too many errors. There is a group for Panama on Telegram. It's t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama, if you want to join.
Trevor_1 (2020-12-11 23:52:51+00:00): I'm reverting this and other Youthmappers changesets because they have too many errors. There is a group for Panama on Telegram. It's t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama, if you want to join.
mariotomo (2020-12-13 16:53:24+00:00): Hi. I would like to thank you for your efforts to improve the map of Panamá, but there's an underlying problem here: lack of communication with the local community.  would you please check and reply here, or on the talk-latam list?
Supaplex (2020-12-12 03:46:36+00:00): 實際上是新店跟中壢一帶
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95703236
eggie (2020-12-11 21:51:52+00:00): In het begin kijken we regelmatig mee.. uiteraard om te helpen. 
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen richting Kadaster als adressen niet kloppen.
Adresnode 9 lijkt hier ook verdwenen.
Normaal komen ze met de BAG import mee.
Het adres staat nu op de gebouwomtrek.
Volgens het Kadaster bestaat nr 11 niet.
Hieronder de gegevens van het kadaster.
mvg
eggie

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=gouwe%209,%20gouwe&resultOffset=0&objectId=0432200000007869&geometry.x=126216.35499573&geometry.y=526554.16299851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0432010000001590
sorcrosc (2021-01-03 15:06:17+00:00): Ho ripristinato le cancellazioni ed eliminato le grandi aree landuse=meadow
rab (2020-12-12 00:09:48+00:00): Hello, I have added or corrected some buildings nearby. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883941810/history
Please try to improve or redraw the rest by yourself.
sorcrosc (2021-01-03 02:06:05+00:00): Modifiche minori? Sono state eliminate tantissime aree ben disegnate. Ripristinato tutto.
ToniE (2020-12-12 14:21:53+00:00): Moin,

für ÖPNV bei euch dort oben "Nah.SH" gibt es eine tägliche Analyse, die z.T. und gerade für neue Linien von euch selber angepasst werden kann ...

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/SH/DE-SH-NAH.SH-Analysis.html

von PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de)

Servus aud Bayern
Toni
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 16:21:27+00:00): Hello Jakka,
The height of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883954883/history is 0.01 whicj would suggest it would be 1cm high.
Perhaps some sort of import error occurred?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17wC
Finds some others
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 16:22:08+00:00): Hallo Jakka,
De hoogte van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883954883/history is 0,01, wat zou suggereren dat het 1 cm hoog zou zijn.
Is er misschien een importfout opgetreden?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17wC
Vindt enkele anderen
Beste wensen,
Andy
Jakka (2021-05-19 16:29:20+00:00): Zeker niet, deze is nodig om een correctere 3D gebouw te produceren. Met overhangende delen schuine daken enz.... Niet wijzigen. Regelmatig verknoeier er deze tagging waardoor daken foutief komen te staan. Zie https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.7962356&lon=3.1844918&zoom=20
Jakka (2021-05-19 16:34:52+00:00): In OSM be wordt enkel het grond contact voor 2D gebruik vandaar deze benadering.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 16:45:45+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height?uselang=en-GB .  The height should be the height of the building in meters
SomeoneElse (2021-05-19 16:46:05+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height?uselang=en-GB. De hoogte moet de hoogte van het gebouw in meters zijn
Jakka (2021-05-19 16:48:16+00:00): daarom de schrijfwijze 0.01 ;)
Glassman (2020-12-12 00:46:58+00:00): Tip: often the imagery is offset. Adjust the offset using the background layers icon on the right hand side of the editor. The offset adjustment is at the botton of the list of imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95705030