piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Shernott (2015-03-21 13:14:37+00:00): Sans doute c'est techniquement correct. Ma question va plutôt dans la direction de l'utilité par rapport au désagrément de les modifier (au cas ou) et de les entretenir.
Vinber (2025-08-31 08:11:13+00:00): Hi,
i saw hat you add stream with name=Berle de Magudas. I don't find any source for this, only Ruisseau de Magudas.

what do you think ?

regards
Geofreund1 (2025-08-31 09:57:33+00:00): Hello Vinber,
it's already some time ago, that I made this entry.
I suppose, that I referred to that part of the stream further to the south, which has been named by user Karto on 2010-02-28. Please contact Karto in this respect.
Thank you.
Geofreud1
bdhurkett (2014-11-29 02:48:19+00:00): Hi, although you presumably fixed several other errors, you did a bit of damage to a local bus route relation (V2 of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4053781/history) with this changeset. It's nothing that can't be fixed, but you might want to keep an eye on that kind of thing in future.
Patr1k_P (2020-10-06 15:36:01+00:00): ahoj, vsimol som si ze par budov mas takto znacenych...v kazdom pripade nie je to vyhladatelne podla cisla,ako keby to tam nebolo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3093088935
Jose Riha (2020-10-07 09:41:51+00:00): ahoj, ano.. je to kvoli tomu, ze pokial viem este stale nie je dohodnuty styl tagovania (konkretne obsah tagu addr:housenumber) pokial obec pouziva supisne aj orientacne cisla (pripad podhajskej), no zaroven niektore budovy maju len supisne cislo.

kazdopadne moj predpoklad je taky, ze budovy oznacene len supisnym cislom su akoby menej vyznamne a teda to, ze ich nominatim nevyhlada, nie je az taky velky problem. j
Patr1k_P (2020-10-07 16:37:08+00:00): aha..no ja som to zas bral tak,ze ked uz tam to cislo je,tak nech to je vyhladatelne,napr.nejaky kurier to moze ocenit alebo ten kto hlada danu budovu podla cisla..
wambacher (2016-11-12 09:57:49+00:00): hi, kannst du mir bitte mal erklären, was du dir bei diesem way gedacht hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304730843#map=19/49.46789/11.07995

Gruss
walter
pyram (2016-11-12 10:54:33+00:00): Klar:
Da steht am Tor die Adresse. Zumindest war das vor zwei Jahren so ;-) Normalerweise bevorzuge ich das Mappen von Adressen am Haupteingang. (Adressen in Nürnberg beziehen sich in der Regel auf das Grundstück oder auf einen Eingang - nicht auf ein Gebäude [mir ist bewusst, dass das kontrovers diskutiert wird]). Das ist hier wegen zwei Gebäuden auf dem Gelände und der Uneinsehbarkeit nicht möglich gewesen. Heute würde ich wahrscheinlich nur einen Node mit Adresse am Tor setzen. Kann man ändern, wenn man will. So wie es ist (mit area=yes) ist das halt der Geltungsbereich der Adresse.
wambacher (2016-11-12 11:47:53+00:00): naja, da der bereich keine beschreibenden tags hat, ist er eigentlich nicht existent. es ist ein "Nichts" mit einer Anschrift. Da nominatim das aber schluckt, werde ich hier nix machen.
pyram (2016-11-12 13:21:32+00:00): Dann wäre aber jeder Adress-POI auch ein "Nichts" ;-) Eine Adresse ist halt nun mal nichts Physisches. Und bei einem Garagenhof mit mehreren Garagen habe ich auch nur die Wahl zwischen einer Area und einem POI:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263728068
Oder die Qualitätsprüfung hat ein Problem mit "doppelter Adresse" (das sind auch meiner Meinung nach keine zwei identischen Adressen):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.41087/11.13071
pyram (2016-11-12 13:22:41+00:00): fix: "identische"
Polarbear (2015-01-05 01:06:45+00:00): w47946029, v9, landuse=mixed ist kein sinnvolles tagging. Landuse sollte die überwiegende Nutzung beschreiben, insofern ist =commercial besser wenn es Büros sind, oder =residential bei Wohnblocks mit kleinen Läden untendrin.
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-12 05:23:35+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107948769  still under construction? Bing suggests no
TheSwavu (2016-06-12 07:50:58+00:00): It has been finished:

http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au/projects/ProjectDetails.aspx?Project_id=050891-13NSW-NP

but it's been a while since I've been on the Barton so I don't know what was built.
mrpulley (2016-06-13 13:06:57+00:00): The construction=minor tag was added 3 years ago. I don't recall any work when I went through a year ago., so it should be safe to delete this tag.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-06-16 00:28:28+00:00): Hi Fabue,

I update the connection of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304774514. It was the road that you've made 5 years ago, I just move and extend the road a bit to the tertiary one based on the updated new imagery. I use Maxar Premium Imagery Beta. thankss..
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-06-16 00:29:18+00:00): you also can find so much GPX data around from local mapper
marc__marc (2020-10-13 23:11:59+00:00): Hello,
can you review the change I made (changing erroneous use of class/type tags)
Thanks,
Marc
Constable (2020-04-13 08:43:06+00:00): Ciao, changeset vecchio vecchio, però questa nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2157369 si riferisce a te
schlagi123 (2018-06-25 06:42:19+00:00): Sind die Punkte "Der Kubus" und "Kaminzimmer" notwendig. Sind das nicht Räume in den Gebäuden, die eher für die Indoorortung und nicht für diese Karten gedacht sind?
torsi101 (2018-06-27 12:47:58+00:00): Beim Kaminzimmer würde ich zustimmen, aber der Kubus ist eine bauliche Besonderheit, die auf dem Campus architektonisch als eigenständiger Gebäudeteil heraussticht.
schlagi123 (2018-06-27 12:55:30+00:00): Über den Kubus kann man sicherlich streiten, aber wahrscheinlich hast du recht.
PlaneMad (2018-02-22 10:31:09+00:00): Namaste Anil. Thank you for the mapping, have made some fixes. Please check :)
Hjart (2015-11-06 11:57:50+00:00): When mapping in Norway make sure to check out gps & Strava layers. Bing imagery is often quite badly aligned here and you basically messed up some stuff here.
arvdk (2017-12-12 20:55:22+00:00): You add 'contstruction finished' but the 'motor_vehicle=no' is kept. Here is a question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1096109
dval (2019-09-09 16:16:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, Surly! Валидатор JOSM выдает здесь много замечаний типа overlapping highways.
dieterdreist (2018-03-05 08:50:02+00:00): this seems to be an undocumented semiautomated  edit. Moves tags from the outlines of the features to the multipolygon, i.e. it removes the properties from the "holes". Please undo this. There is a difference between tags on a way and tags on a multipolygon relation, in case the relation has holes.
We do not tag things differently due to some software that currently has problems interpreting correct data.
dieterdreist (2018-03-05 08:53:15+00:00): OK, sorry, maybe I was too fast. I agree the tagging on the way in question (Palazzo Braschi) was somehow questionable as well. On the one hand, the inner yard can arguably be seen as part of the palazzo, also of the name "Palazzo Braschi", but on the other hand, this inner part isn't building=yes.
mboeringa (2018-03-05 18:40:04+00:00): No, this was certainly not some semi-automated edit. I carefully selected and reviewed all of the features in the changeset. Most were obvious issues. As to the particular issue with court yards, as you write, it is not building=yes, and thus needs exclusion. Everybody will reasonably understand it is likely part of the complex's ownership, even if not included with the specific building tagging, so I don't think this is an issue at all.
dieterdreist (2018-03-06 17:13:02+00:00): "Everybody will reasonably understand it is likely part of the complex's ownership, even if not included with the specific building tagging, so I don't think this is an issue at all." --> I was arguing that "Palazzo Braschi" probably includes the courtyard, but in building=* it shouldn't be included. Of course we could put only the name on the outline, but then it wouldn't be clear to what it refers. Anyway, this is nothing particularly relevant for this changeset and we should better speak somewhere else about it. As I had written: sorry for the noise.
mboeringa (2018-03-06 18:32:27+00:00): Yes, no problem ;-), I agree its a minor issue and I understand your reasoning, and I think it is fine like this. There will always be some issues with the translation of the real world to the secondary fictional world of a map and its data model. We don't want to map 1:1 as the famous stories go... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Exactitude_in_Science
Endres Pelka (2014-12-04 09:40:47+00:00): Why did you connect all the way segments, when they have different lanes tag? Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27231248
RicoElectrico (2016-10-14 06:34:00+00:00): Many of these outlines are outright wrong. It even has been featured on "Worst of OSM" blog. http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/post/148016716836/in-ulster-county-ny-people-live-in-small-square

Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304898428/
naoliv (2015-10-13 01:10:16+00:00): AjBelnuovo, qual o nome correto desses dois trechos nomeados "RS 3301" e "RS 3310"?
E de onde você obteve os nomes?
AjBelnuovo (2015-10-14 16:13:02+00:00): resposta numa mensagem privada.
daniel_solow (2018-11-13 04:31:09+00:00): Hi I noticed the building footprints all look like squares. Are you planning to change their shapes to match satellite imagery?
TomHynes (2018-11-14 14:54:27+00:00): Currently in to process to procure higher resolution building footprints
Uli_CH (2026-05-14 15:07:47+00:00): A mon avis, le chemin 304907527 (Arête est du Rocher de Roquebrune) et du difficulté T4 / sac_scale=alpine_hiking:
"Traces de sentier, souvent sans chemin. Terrain raide accidenté. Quelques passages d’escalade faciles (I). Champs de blocs."
"Exigences: Avoir l’habitude de passages exposés. Avoir le pied sûr. Bonne capacité d’orientation."
Jojo4u (2026-05-15 13:03:29+00:00): It was eleven years ago. Maybe the path deteriorated. If you have - after careful deliberation - another classification today I have no problem with a reclassification. Go ahead! Regards.
PlaneMad (2015-03-08 19:55:40+00:00): Hi Jacob, I noticed that you removed a lot of station names from the Chennai region. Any reason for this?
Jacob Cyriac (2015-08-08 14:05:37+00:00): Hello PlaneMad, 

Noticed this message just now in my email.

I was attempting to update electrified: tags in this region. If I deleted station names, that's definitely a mistake or a sync with JOSM gone wrong. My apologies!

It's been a while since I was active, sorry this escaped my attention. I imagine you or someone has reverted this to an older version with the correct names. Hope it wasn't a tonne of trouble.

Cheers
Jacob
DUGA (2021-06-25 16:24:12+00:00): Not a fence. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304933317#map=19/39.07971/-76.53387
bbmiller (2015-03-13 19:05:58+00:00): Hey, is there a reason why you classified these roads as tertiary? Most of them dirt roads, on a relatively un-populated island, and it doesn't seem justified that they would be above highway=residential.
Skybunny (2015-03-15 15:29:06+00:00): I think at the time I classified them that way based on 'they're about that _relative_ importance to get around the island.

Point taken though. I've reclassified everything that's not the (probably paved) ferry access road as 'unclassified'. (Feel free to do that one too if you feel it should be.) Thanks!
bbmiller (2015-03-15 16:51:51+00:00): Cool. That seems fine to me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-23 17:28:49+00:00): Why http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3095362841#map=19/48.65969/2.09319 is tagged with access:bicycle=yes instead of standard bicycle=yes? (the same with pedestrian access)
bopoh13 (2020-01-31 16:00:35+00:00): Attributes building=retail and building:part=yes should not be are indicated inside the multipolygon (https://osm.org/way/304987175). kendzi3d displays part of the building not from 3 floors, but from 1 floor.
Attribute "ele" indicates altitude (above sea level). To specify the local height, you need to use the artibute "height".
bprm (2015-09-11 21:32:47+00:00): Seems like you made a mistake with the following ways:
305008911
305008910
arcanma (2014-12-07 16:10:57+00:00): Percorso L'Antica Via Flaminia aggiunto quasi sempre in sovrapposizione o a fianco di percorsi esistenti.
Tom Chups (2021-03-25 11:56:08+00:00): говнотечка не есть name
user_1566574 (2020-12-28 20:29:21+00:00): Bonsoir,
Vous avez indiqué que la Rue des Capucins était à sens unique.
Est-ce le cas sur toute la portion de la rue ? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39770651)

Merci d'avance. :)
eggie (2022-06-06 11:42:06+00:00): Please edit all over the world in one changeset.. This may harm the map.

Greetz,
eggie
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-13 18:09:40+00:00): This import changeset is missing some tags.  Please check the import guidelines.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-14 19:45:37+00:00): This import spelled "height" as "hight".
wvdp (2015-03-15 01:14:55+00:00): changed the splling in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29483053
also check some of the other trees in the country
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-15 06:19:56+00:00): splling is spelled "spelling".
sperlingskauz (2017-12-03 21:36:27+00:00): Hi Plop76,

for your information: I changed your tagging man_made = bee_hive to man_made = beehive. The reason is that since this year there is a wiki page for beehives.

Regards,
sperlingskauz
woodpeck (2015-05-13 05:59:23+00:00): This appears to me to be an un-discussed and rather useless import, since the roughly 4000 nodes carry no tags that mean anything in OSM. Can you explain?
MarkusHD (2015-05-18 20:09:14+00:00): Diese Änderung wurde nicht umgesetzt wie beabsichtigt, das Wohngebiet Sulzbach-West wurde in ein Gebäude mit Hausnummer geändert. Am besten immer das Ergebnis auf openstreetmap.org prüfen, auch ein Kommentar im changeset ist hilfreich. Ich habe die Änderung rückgängig gemacht, siehe auch http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/361718
maraf24 (2015-06-07 19:16:19+00:00): Jak tam remont mostu? Zakończył się w terminie czy wciąż trwa?
Nakaner (2015-04-01 18:48:14+00:00): Ways which are used tagged area=yes without any other tags are useless for OSM and all its data users. Please add the necessary tags (i.e. building=yes if it is a building).
anderfo (2016-11-07 09:56:33+00:00): Hei,
jeg har nå gjort om denne til en skiløype (byttet ut highway=path med piste:type=nordic og piste:grooming=classic) samt tegnet løype videre. Fint om du vil "korrekturlese" litt.
Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps og evt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Skil%C3%B8yper
wambacher (2016-11-12 09:55:28+00:00): hi, kannst du mir bitte mal erklären, was du dir bei diesem way gedacht hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304730843#map=19/49.46789/11.07995

Gruss
walter
geodreieck4711 (2016-11-12 20:46:54+00:00): Walter, ich habe nur überschneidende Linien korrigiert, (OSMI), und addr:city hinzugefügt.
Frag doch mal den Ersteller des Gebäudeumrisses.......
marc__marc (2021-04-24 18:07:49+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300717053
can you review it ?
a transformater is a device inside a power=substation, so the whole building look like to be a power=substation and not a transformater
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl%3ATag%3Apower%3Dsubstation
Regards,
Marc
Saxonyking (2016-01-22 18:03:43+00:00): Warum hast du die Adresse der Autowerkstatt - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107970972 - gelöscht?
GerdP (2015-10-28 10:13:17+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=fire_escape
is ony used here. 
I think you can use normal tags like
highway=steps or highway=footway
in combination with access=permissive
?
RoterEmil (2017-05-15 22:14:43+00:00): Hallo 'ChrissW-R1', im OSM-Forum ist eine Diskussion über die (Un-)Möglichkeiten entstanden, Fernbuslinien bei OSM in Zeiten eines in stetem Wandel befindlichen Fernbusmarktes einzutragen. Da ich über den häufig arg veralteten Stand der Fernbuslinien am Berliner ZOB auf das Thema gekommen bin und Du dort u.a. neue Fernbuslinien hinzugefügt hast, schreibe ich Dich nun an, damit Du von der Diskussion dort erfährst und Dich gern ggf. dort beteiligen/Deine Einschätzung zur Sache geben kannst: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56609. Schöne Grüße :)
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-28 10:08:44+00:00): Hi RoterEmil,

danke für den Verweis auf die Diskussion. Ich hatte damals angefangen ein paar Linien zu ergänzen, mich dann aber dauerhaft auf andere Features konzentriert.
Gerade habe ich mich auf der FOSSGIS noch mit einigen Personen zu Fernbussen ausgetauscht. Da sich einiges in der Vergangenheit getan hat, könnte ich hier in Zukunft vielleicht wieder ins Mapping einsteigen. Z.B. besteht die Möglichkeit Routen automatisch mit GTFS RT Daten zu prüfen und so schneller Abweichungen zu erkennen und zu korrigieren.

VG
Chriss
Sanderd17 (2014-12-17 10:49:20+00:00): Is there a reason why you put a space inside the ref? AFAIK, it's a habit to not use spaces there, so E403 and not E 403.

Also, whenever an international ref is known, we use it as ref (and nat_ref for the old national refs). So destination:ref=E403 would be recognisable than only destination:int_ref=E403 (though both tags together would be idea).
pyrog (2020-09-01 04:37:17+00:00): Bonjour,

La modification du club de foot de Vieugy n'est pas adaptée :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62583405/history

- le bâtiment doit rester un bâtiment.
- le tag centre-sportif pour un club de foot ne colle pas vraiment.
Il faut utiliser club=sport + sport=soccer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:club%3Dsport

Je corrige…

Cordialement,

__
Yves
5m4u9 (2017-03-13 22:40:20+00:00): hola, estos datos de que son? parecen algo de censo. 

está etiquetado como aldea pero es un límite grande y podríamos interpretarlo como municipio pero no, el municipio es mas grande y distinto.
Pandrez (2017-03-14 13:34:50+00:00): Hola!
estos son los limites de algunas comunidades que son parte del municipio de Comarapa. Entre estos limites estan la parte con habitaciones y las parte de cultivo y corrales de cada comunidad.
Dibujé solo estas porqué son las comunidades con las cuales trabajo para realizar una red de agua potable.
5m4u9 (2017-03-14 14:35:49+00:00): anda, que bueno. genial el trabajo.

como son áreas dentro de una posible jerarquía administrativa podríamos añadirlos por el momento como "boundary=administrative" + "admin_level=10", es decir, partes del municipio sin autoridad administrativa.

también habría que añadir su punto del hamlet donde está el centro "urbano" de la comunidad.

la ventaja de corregir a boundary (limite) es que el buscador y otros podrán utilizar y gestionar mejor los elementos internos.
5m4u9 (2017-03-14 14:38:46+00:00): ah, mirá no me dí cuenta y ya tiene place=hamlet como nodo → https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=25697534

ahora solo sería el tema de limites
Pandrez (2017-03-14 14:50:02+00:00): està bien! pero todas estas comunidades son administradas por OTB o sindicatos... entonce no se si se pueden poner sin autoridad administrativa... que me aconseja? no soy muy enteredo de estas cosas. :)
5m4u9 (2017-03-14 15:04:54+00:00): hace algún tiempo hice una propuesta para bolivia en cuanto límites → https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries

en esta propuesta, tomaba admin_level=11 para vecindarios, barrios, otbs, osea niveles locales de limites.

en admin_level=9 serían para distritos, juntas vecinales, comunas, osea algo más grande que barrios locales.

nunca pensé para sindicados, pero yo creo que son extensiones más grandes que barrios urbanos/rurales, admin_level=9. qué piensas vos?

en uno de estos días puedo hacer el cambio y te muestro antes de subir. no hay apuro.
5m4u9 (2017-03-14 15:16:53+00:00): nos puede ayudar un poco saber como esta organizado el área rural. investigué un poco y es: sindicato agrario → subcentral → central, a veces dentro del municipio a veces no, a veces dentro de provincia. yo creo que así sindicato=barrio urbano=11, subcentral a subdistritos=10 y centrales=comunas=macrodistritos=9

estoy preguntando a expertos y vemos de dejarlo lo mejor.
5m4u9 (2017-03-14 15:26:20+00:00): para poner contexto, encontré este documento que más o menos responde nuestras dudas, hay que leer un poco. https://www.slideshare.net/doctora_edilicia/pdm-comarapa
igeopr (2014-11-03 13:39:21+00:00): Se ve bien la Placita!
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:14:02+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305244950,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305244951
have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:43:14+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746400
Polarbear (2016-07-05 22:42:19+00:00): Dear OSMuser6589, can you please explain where this way comes from, and what source you have used: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305246227

The path does not exist in nature, nor does it have a GPS trace, nor does it appear in the 'Strava Global Heat' layer you have cited. It did not exist in 2014 either, I was going to the nearby climbing tower quite often...
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 13:53:45+00:00): Hello!

In unlikely case that you still remember or can visit this place...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39932666/history

surface=cobbled? What you meant by that? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=cobblestone ?
eggie (2019-07-17 22:10:03+00:00): Wellicht heb je wat aan onze welkomstmail met nutige links en tips die ook herstartende mappers krijgen. 
Ik zal die per PB je toezenden...
MVG,
Eggie
Eddie Turfboer (2019-07-20 08:37:43+00:00): Bedankt. Ik doe te weinig wijzigingen om er echt bedreven in te worden. Maar ik zal de informatie lezen en zo goed mogelijk proberen toe te passen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-22 04:32:00+00:00): Have you discussed that bot edit with local or global OpenStreetMap community?

For reference, at time of making this edit automated code of conduct rules looked like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct&oldid=1041553
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-22 04:32:54+00:00): I think that this edit was wrong, is wrong and should be reverted.

Mass adding building=dam to all waterway=dam is wrong, incorrect and unique to Turkey.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-22 04:33:00+00:00): (and China)
katpatuka (2026-03-22 06:29:50+00:00): You're right. In fact I do not remember having made such a silly overpass update query 11 years ago - when ever I notice that tag on any dam I now remove that tag immediately manually!

It may of course be reverted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 13:35:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3098850498/history has sc=TORRE 9 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Gemeente Evergem (2022-02-08 13:18:51+00:00): Verwijderen. Is geen openbare weg.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-22 10:15:59+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1363580 ? I suspect that Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a mistake.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-22 10:16:30+00:00): In other words: I suspect that this object does not really exists.
elgolfo (2018-04-23 11:23:23+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
no it is not a joke. The church is for real. According to the forum discussion I believe your doubts are gone?

Best
Moritz
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-23 16:03:22+00:00): Yes, I closed note and added link to the thread on the object to make future editors less confused.
Gustavo22Soares (2026-05-28 17:11:23+00:00): Oi, tenha mais cuidado para não sobrepor edificios já mapeados
eggie (2020-11-08 11:49:02+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Roelieboelie (2020-11-08 12:42:12+00:00): Bedankt eggie.
Alecs01 (2014-11-25 20:39:28+00:00): Hi there, are you sure this railway line is not under construction right now? there's still no train service; construction started in 2009, at the very end it should be 2-tracks (from Varese to Arcisate at least, heading to Switzerland), partly underground. Thanks
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:13:28+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305403804
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:42:30+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746400