piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartler175 (2022-09-30 16:13:33+00:00): Please pay attention to context and sideffects of your edits:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.50422&lat=44.73328&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:31:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800703
b-jazz (2022-10-04 22:41:48+00:00): Hello Shafter CA,

The landuse=residential tag isn't meant for single parcels, but entire neighborhoods. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential for the following line: "The landuse tag is mostly used for larger areas and not at parcel granularity". You might want to re-edit those that you've created. At the very least, please consider not using parcel-level landuse tags in the future. Thx.
gis_shafter (2022-10-05 17:03:59+00:00): We've made the appropriate changes where necessary, and we'll be abiding by this practice from now on. Thanks b-jazz.
mueschel (2022-10-09 09:16:21+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits again: There are many ways like this one, without any proper tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098950313
gis_shafter (2022-10-10 15:10:13+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll take care of it.
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:21:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. Do not include yards
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800750
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:23:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800750
Frans S (2022-09-30 13:36:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
1 point.   Tag buildings as building=yes
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800779
Frans S (2022-09-30 13:35:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention on accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings. See the instructions as well.
* Overlapping buildings drawn.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126800860
TheSwavu (2022-11-20 08:04:06+00:00): Hi,

You've made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278786632 one way which means you can't turn right. There is a turn lane in the imagery.

Was this based on survey?

Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2022-09-30 11:06:38+00:00): Hola Camilo
A veces veo que cambias nombres de calles por otros. Desconozco si siempre estuvieron mal o si cambiaron de nombre. En el segundo caso, por favor dejar el nombre antiguo como old_name=. hay veces en que en verdad el cambio de nombres de calles genera problemas y esa es la manera de solucionarlo.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126801209
Frans S (2022-10-02 14:11:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126801436
Frans S (2022-10-02 14:10:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. 
And, the tag footway is to be used in Urban areas. 
Here, a tag :path is more  relevant.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S . Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126801604
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-01 06:25:39+00:00): Nenaudoju iD, tai negaliu pasakyti tiksliai, kaip tai atsitiko, bet matau rezultatą - daug viršūnių, kurios priklauso atskiriems poligonams, atskirtos (sudėtos viena ant kitos). Iš to gaunam krūva topologijos problemų (persidengiantys arba nepilnai susiliečiantys poligonai).
DaanLT (2022-10-01 08:19:06+00:00): Hmm, teks sutikrinti su josm po kelių dienų tada
Frans S (2022-10-02 14:40:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126801715
Frans S (2022-10-02 14:52:20+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Especially the paragraph about tagging residential highways
Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Other countries:
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126801721
nevw (2022-09-30 05:40:42+00:00): Hi
You have added the business details to the whole building. If the business is one of many businesses operating from the building you should add the business details to a separate node within the building footprint in a similar manner to the other businesses located here.
save2desk (2023-02-10 07:45:28+00:00): А можете делать всё то же самое, но не удалять лишнего и не ломать навигацию?
user_14840936 (2023-02-20 12:58:32+00:00): Лишнее, оно на то и лишнее, чтобы его лишиться. А о какой "навигации" базар, позвольте спросить?
user_14840936 (2023-02-20 13:26:50+00:00): ЗЫ: Вы вольны абсолютно всё вернуть взад. Никаких претензий с моей стороны не будет. Гарантирую! БлядЬ, куда я попал?!.. Мама, роди меня обратно!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:19:35+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
joost schouppe (2022-10-11 11:47:41+00:00): Hoi,
Wat is je bron om de N28 aan te duiden in Halle? Ik weet dat het er logisch uit ziet op die manier, maar ik heb nog nergens een officiële bron gezien noch verkeersborden die dit zo aanduiden op de nieuwe brug
A67-A67 (2022-10-11 21:49:45+00:00): Hoi,

Er was een gat geslagen in de primaire weg en de routerelatie van de N28, na de opening van de nieuwe Misiabrug en de afwaardering van de Suikerkaai. Ik heb dat hersteld, volgens de enige logische manier. Daarvoor heb ik verder geen bron gebruikt.
vimacs_hacks (2022-10-01 01:36:51+00:00): 这个修改集添加了重复的站台，已经删掉： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126844912
cnvery (2023-02-16 03:28:14+00:00): 好的，谢谢@vimacs_hacks！
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 05:31:38+00:00): Hi charlief46r, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping? You removed an entire way and not only a "waypoint". Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 14:47:55+00:00): Olá, Caio!

Os semáforos para pedestres (crossing=traffic_signals) foram removidos nesses pontos?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10049421188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10049421190
Caconog (2022-09-30 17:38:01+00:00): Boa tarde, Adriano!
Agora que eu percebi alterei no JOSM achando que era semáforos de veiculos, a noite ja vou incluir e ficar atento para próximas alterações
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 18:44:31+00:00): Boa tarde!

Normal, acontece.

É muita coisa para se atentar. O bom é que sempre dá pra corrigir.

Abraço!
rhtb0 (2022-10-02 11:34:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
lefuturiste (2022-09-30 07:26:53+00:00): Hello, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
The next time you are doing contributions, could you please consider to split you work in multiple changesets? (eg. one changeset per continent or country)  It would make it easier for the community to navigate around contributions.
Thanks.
SekeRob (2022-09-30 07:57:47+00:00): Change Set summary warnings: 10 (ten) , created with RapiD 1.1.9
yasslay (2022-09-30 17:15:35+00:00): Hello!

LoveandPeace99 seems to have done lots of similar edits based off of their edit history. The roads they added, at least the ones in China line up with imagery, but the user strangely didn't bother to map the rest of the area. It also should be mentioned that where possible that changesets should be kept as small as possible.

Kind regards,
yasslay
aharvey (2026-05-11 23:53:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10052493601/history was deleted recently but it's still referenced as an example at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water#Photo_examples

Was the drinking water removed? If so should we remove the reference from the wiki?
habi (2022-09-30 06:37:37+00:00): Please use the changeset comment to describe what you did: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments, it helps to see what you did.
(Also see your other changeset comments, apart from the early ones)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
tastrax (2022-10-24 02:49:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mweper (2022-10-01 20:57:04+00:00): Hola. ¿Aquí realmente hay un kiosco con ese nombre explicito o lo has añadido como una descripción del elemento?

Por favor, recuerda sólo añadir el nombre del elemento en la etiqueta "name=*".
Meneldur (2022-10-01 22:02:20+00:00): ¡Hola! En efecto alllí hay un kiosco cuyo nombre es ese.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.