piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
burtlang (2016-12-06 18:26:25+00:00): I will make sure what I see in my survey is correct, and ask others for there opinions as well if it is a close call. Thank you for double checking my data. Is there anything else that you have noticed?
muralito (2016-12-08 17:01:54+00:00): No, I hadn't check all changesets.
I just raise a warning flag to try to improve the changes based on this KG 2016 survey.
Carnildo (2016-12-05 23:59:25+00:00): Please don't abbreviate street names.  It's easy enough for a computer to turn a full name into an abbreviated one if it needs to save space, but going the other direction can be difficult or impossible.  For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", or "Saint"?
Glassman (2016-12-05 22:14:14+00:00): Rather than delete the driveways, a better choice is to mark them as highway=service, service=driveway and then mark them as access=private. If emergency vehicles need to access that area, then the roads will be on the map.
Mark Wamsley (2016-12-05 22:35:52+00:00): Ok. But the roads I deleted aren't roads/driveways anymore. They have been permanently barricaded and impassable. The WA Department of Natural Resources has decommissioned roads in the area. They are reverting back to wild growth. I can provide photos and legal paperwork.
Alecs01 (2016-12-08 08:43:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please pay attention, you changed the name of a village to an address, corrected now.
Alecs01 (2016-12-08 16:41:39+00:00): Please do not duplicate existing objects, this hotel was already on the map: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4277857365
muralito (2016-12-06 03:16:42+00:00): STOP DELETING NODES OF FUEL STATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YOU ARE TRASHING THE MAP!!!!!!!!!
burtlang (2016-12-06 17:54:14+00:00): Thank you, I will no longer continue to remove nodes on gas stations.
DannyAiquipa (2016-12-06 14:19:38+00:00): Hey there! 
Have you any reason for delete this landuse  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52673631?
ConsEbt (2017-01-02 19:01:32+00:00): Hi Sam888, would it be possible to include a comment describing you changeset in the future? This would be helpful for others in the future.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-06 00:53:37+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457980033
seems to be the same thing as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2670736293 .  Presumably the POIs should be merged?
Best Regards,
Andy
IIVQ (2016-12-28 11:08:13+00:00): Hoi Paulbe,

Waarom heb je een heel kort stukje Elsrijkdreef (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436155824) van secondary naar trunk veranderd?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-12-05 23:26:36+00:00): Changeset enviado por engano, será revertido agora.
marc__marc (2024-08-14 08:42:54+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux dire source=arial survey Bing 05-12-16 ?
est-ce la même chose que source=aerial imagery ?
Cordialement,
Marc
user_5359 (2016-12-11 17:31:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384114483 ? Your new street goes trougth the building. I have cleanup the other problems..
vramirez122000 (2016-12-06 17:36:33+00:00): Buen trabajo! Te puedo añadir en facebook?
skorasaurus (2017-01-09 19:34:38+00:00): hi, thanks for editing but Dodd camera isn't a supermarket as you had indicated; it's a camera shop and it already existed on the map, so I deleted it. 

Thanks again for editing OSM and hope to see you again on here.
Vinicius   Sisoto (2018-12-07 21:52:01+00:00): wargoIIo
mterry (2016-12-11 15:47:43+00:00): What is a lanelet? These changes don't look right.
margonotmango (2016-12-12 02:34:57+00:00): Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet. 
But now I'm trying to revert changeset.
I'm so sorry.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
Polarbear (2016-12-13 10:52:54+00:00): Welche Quelle gibt es für das Cafe? 

Du mappst mal in Woltersdorf, DE, und plötzlich in Costa Rica?
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
AndersAndersson (2016-12-07 07:10:19+00:00): Why did you put chinese descriptions after the house number in the addr:housenumber tag? I will remove that. Please add descriptions under the note tag.
GOwin (2016-12-06 12:09:40+00:00): Please select the MapBox imagery from the layers menu. It has the most up-to-date imagery, compared to Bing.
freebeer (2018-12-26 15:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65787623 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut on the beach
burtlang (2016-12-08 16:44:01+00:00): Nice work!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=44193133#map=19/-34.88871/-56.14692
DavidKewley (2016-12-07 02:00:16+00:00): Hi dennistp, thank you for adding features to our worldwide shared map! I see you added the guest_house and hospital twice (I assume by accident), so I've remove the duplicates.

I added tags to the hospital (e.g. address details, website, phone number). Is it best tagged a hospital (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital) , or perhaps healthcare=rehabilitation or something else?

The guest_house node is in the street, and should be moved to the correct building. Is it truly a guest_house business (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house), or perhaps the home of a friend of yours? If the latter, it shouldn't be tagged a guest_house, just the appropriate type of residential building.

Again, thanks for adding points of interest, and please keep it up. -David
user_5359 (2016-12-17 13:32:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the business to the right building.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:34:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
dluciv (2017-01-26 07:47:08+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Есть подозрение, что на самом деле линия в эксплуатацию не сдана.

Переезд пока не сделан, о чём повешена новая табличка, но это не аргумент.

Аргумент — то, что до сих пор не отрехтовано верхнее строение пути. Очень криво положено. Будут его выпрямлять или просто оставят, как есть, и ограничат скорость до маневровой  — не в курсе...
Dinamik (2017-01-26 08:16:45+00:00): 1) В районе Петергофской нефтебазы ближе к востоку пути и не ремонтировались: там был оставлен тупик для отстоя вагонов - поэтому construction на всю линию, в любом случае, неверен.
2) rail был поставлен по факту после наблюдения прохождения по линии состава.
SK53 (2016-12-06 12:37:00+00:00): At least one of these assignments is incorrect Newton data does not apply to the OSM element Newton CP
SK53 (2016-12-06 12:45:41+00:00): Actually data looks OK, but the wikipedia article link is wrong & the wikipedia article looks to be out-of-date.
nyuriks (2016-12-07 06:58:31+00:00): @SK53, sorry not sure what you mean. I looked at Newton - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6488382 - seems to be in order and matching the Wikipedia article. I couldn't find Netwon CP, only Newton Valence http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3344971 - if you think there is an error, let me know with links, I will try to fix it.
user_5359 (2016-12-28 18:47:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
muralito (2016-12-07 15:26:53+00:00): surface=sett and not cobblestone is a better choice for this kind of surface. 

Most (if not all) surface=cobblestone in Montevideo are errors and should be put in a todo list to evaluate and correct them. 

Also, with sett there are several situations, in some strets the smothness is good and aceptable to drive in a car (like this small part), and in others streets "paved" with sett are so bad that if you drive there it will loosen you teeths.
frosm (2019-07-03 15:03:00+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4525269890
qu'est-ce que c'est ?
le tag principal parlait d'un lieux communautaire et d'un terrain de jeux pour enfant (j'ai viré ce dernier)
le nom parle d'un club
la description du dernier changement parle d'un terrain de boule
frosm (2019-07-05 08:24:54+00:00): suite à notre discussion en privé, j'ai donc modifié les tags pour décrire correctement le terrain de boule
pordiquet (2019-07-07 09:47:54+00:00): étiez vous obligé d'effacer le club de bridge et d'enlever le petit marqueur qui permet de repérer le boulodrome qui peut s'adresser aux enfants? faites vous partie du sytème dictatorial macroniste?
frosm (2019-07-07 21:33:08+00:00): je fais partie des volontaires qui essayent de corriger vos erreurs, cela mérite un peu plus de considération que de tels propos.
je vous ai posé la question plusieurs fois sur ce que signifiait cette incohérent, vous ne m'avez parlé que du terrain de boule. j'ai donc finit par supposé qu'il n'y avait que cela. J'ai restauré le club de bridge, qui je suppose ne joue pas couché sur le boulodrome, je l'ai donc mis à sa position intiale, libre à vous d'ajuster.
frosm (2019-07-07 21:35:15+00:00): quand au petit dessin "pleine de jeux pour enfant" (le genre de lieu avec bac à sable, toboggan, balançoire), c'est assez normal de ne pas le voir sur un objet "terrain de sport boulodrome", on tag pour la réalité des choses, pas de fausse info pour faire "un joli icône", dans osm un terrain de sport n'est pas la même chose qu'un terrain de jeu pour enfant, même si les enfants peuvent bien évidement faire du sport
BeKri (2016-12-10 15:48:59+00:00): Servus,
und Du bist sicher, dass sich die Hausnummer Bodenseestraße 293 so verschoben hat ?
Supaplex (2016-12-06 07:27:17+00:00): 重覆了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4790870
Supaplex (2016-12-06 07:27:32+00:00): 內湖高中重覆了
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:21:06+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2016-12-17 13:38:36+00:00): Is the name of 117730 correct?  It was last edited by a user who changed it from what I thought it was called.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-26 23:57:50+00:00): For completeness, I fixed 117730 a while back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45037487 (the problem was unrelated to this edit, or to wikidata).
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:35:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
DavidKewley (2016-12-07 02:05:10+00:00): You've put this new POI in the middle of a parking structure. It should probably be located within the neighboring mall building, at its correct location. Could you fix this please? Thanks! -David
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:35:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:41:40+00:00): [Almanza Dos, Las Piñas] tag number of floors in buildings occupying Greenhills Christian Fellowship South Metro, add address tag to Minerva Tyre Gallery
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-12-28 17:12:00+00:00): Hi, something has gone rather wrong with this change. You changed Chessington South to disused, which has obviously confused local mappers as it is very much still in use. I have fixed this but in future please can you add meaningful comments to your changes so that other mappers can work out what you were expecting to achieve
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:36:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
nyuriks (2016-12-06 13:45:12+00:00): Sorry about this one, I meant to break it into smaller ones. All these are admin_level=6 relations with Wikipedia links being redirects.
DaxServer (2016-12-07 08:02:57+00:00): Yeah, you could have broken into smaller changesets. Maybe next time :)
I've monitoring changes in my town and your changeset appears in history!
Alecs01 (2016-12-08 08:34:31+00:00): Per favore non eliminarlo di nuovo, un nodo così esiste per tutte le regioni italiane e non solo, si può discutere se sia utile o meno, ma non lo cancellerei così senza nemmeno spiegare il perchè, grazie.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Osm1980 (2016-12-06 13:30:22+00:00): چرا به تذکرات توجه نمیکنید؟
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jaap de vries (2016-12-06 15:57:33+00:00): Ik zie dat je hier een wijziging hebt gedaan, graag vermelden wat je hebt gedaan. De naam Sligro stond al op de kaart in de vorm van een poi. 
Goed inzoomen voordat je iets aanpast.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:37:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Osm1980 (2016-12-06 13:27:41+00:00): دوست گرانقدر تگ نیم رو اینجوری تگ گذاری نمیکنن!!
user_5359 (2016-12-28 19:00:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:08:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
gt33 (2016-12-06 11:15:25+00:00): MISTAKE IS NOT A PATH
Supaplex (2016-12-06 14:39:51+00:00): 重複了
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:08:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:08:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-12-07 11:20:19+00:00): Hi,
you put the tag "osmuser=MapMakinMeyers" on many objects - your user name should not appear in the tags of a node.
Could you remove this?

Jan
MapMakinMeyers (2016-12-07 12:18:52+00:00): Jan,
Sorry, It was my first time using JOSM.  Is there a easy way to do this?  not sure how it happened.

Thanks and sorry about this issue
MapMakinMeyers (2016-12-07 12:32:19+00:00): I think I removed them - Sorry about this mess.  Please let me know if it is gone
Hjart (2016-12-06 11:58:01+00:00): Please note that this is not for private bookmarking
mavl (2019-01-13 17:15:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
MKnight (2016-12-24 17:04:54+00:00): moin, Du hast hier [1] ein living_street mit maxspeed=30 getaggt.
living_street hat aber kein explizites maxspeed und 30 erst recht nicht ;)

Was ist richtig?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.56669/10.41243
BlackyP8 (2016-12-25 00:19:03+00:00): Hallo,

danke für den Hinweis, die 30-Zone habe ich dort beim taggen auf living_street leider vergessen zu entfernen.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433485 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44207120 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
roiwang (2018-05-08 11:26:11+00:00): the property name already  changed as:
Feng Huang Ten People One House
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433451 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44207401 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:56:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:54:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433427 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44207694 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:54:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:54:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433392 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44208026 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:51:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:16:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:51:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:50:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:42:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:41:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359