piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2018-12-16 14:07:56+00:00): Eine andere Stelle wäre noch der Import-Katalog .. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
tux67 (2018-12-18 09:31:54+00:00): Wenn du die Overpass Abfrage von mueschel nochmal ausführst, dann sind immer noch 6 chapeau=kultur über.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65509442
user_3716049 (2018-12-18 17:54:38+00:00): Sorry, dachte es währen nur 2 CS gewesen.

Gruß Kelso
mavl (2018-12-19 16:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65615609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2399].
mavl (2018-12-19 16:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65615609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2399].
Luzandro (2021-01-20 18:16:05+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du bitte die Adressen im Mühlweg nochmal kontrollieren? Die von dir eingetragenen Hausnummern 2-10 werden von BEV/basemap als 10-18 angegeben, während Mühlweg 2 dieses Gebäude sein soll: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500661439/history

Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/65509629
czubi (2018-12-16 13:14:59+00:00): Hallo mondstern,
schön das du bei OSM mithilfst.
Versuche möglichst die Öffnungszeiten "maschinenlesbar" einzutragen. Dieses tool hilft dir dabei.
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
czubi (2018-12-16 13:19:28+00:00): Für die Bürgeraue habe ich es mal beispielhaft gemacht,
Wichtig ist z.B. das Semikolon. Und wenn möglich keine Leerzeichen. Schau dir mal die Bsp. im Link an, da sieht man es glaube ich ganz gut. danke
Rich1234 (2018-12-15 22:30:10+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to open street map.

Is there a reason why you deleted the service road that led into the parking area?  Without that way, routing engines will be unable to route into the parking area.  As well, had you used JOSM, the validator would have complained "no access to parking" because there is no "way" upon which to drive to get to the parking spaces.

Also, is there a reason why you removed the address tags from the building outline of the apartment building and instead inserted them into a new, free standing node, and added an invalid tag to the freestanding node (the key "residental" is not used with nodes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential).  All of the tags, other than the keys landuse and residential, on the new node should simply be tagged on the outline of the building itself, as they all apply to the building.
bddavidson (2018-12-16 16:48:31+00:00): Hey Rich. The problem with that being a service road along with the address on the building is that routing engines force drivers to drive in there when there is no outlet and really, not a large amount of space to turn around. I originally put in the point to move the address onto the curb instead of the centroid of the building, but I realized after I saved that's not best practice and just haven't gone back to fix it. I'm going to add a new little service road to get to the parking and hopefully that will fix most of the routing issues I've been seeing. Thanks for flagging!
Rich1234 (2018-12-16 17:27:33+00:00): Ah, that makes some sense re. the service road.  What if the bulk of the road were tagged as "parking aisle" instead of service?  I.e., a small bit of "service" from Wilson, with the remainder being "parking aisle" (and really, looking at the size of that little lot, parking aisle is more correct for most of the way in any case.

Maybe that might tweak the routers to not use the parking lot to reach the building.

Also, an additional option which might help is to put a node on the building outline located where the entrance to the building exists, tag it as "entrance" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance) and add the building address to that node (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#If_the_address_applies_to_a_point_.28e.g._entrance.2C_gate.29).  This method is commonly used for large buildings with individual street level shops that each have a separate street address apart from the building, so it is a method that is in use a lot elsewhere.

The other building metadata tags could still go on the building outline itself, but this would place the address at the location, physically, where someone would actually enter/exit the building, and might also convince routers to ignore the little parking lot parking-aisle way.
gurglypipe (2018-12-16 18:42:09+00:00): The wiki gives a few more tags which should be used for indicating listed status: heritage:operator=, HE_ref= and listed_status=. See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65528977
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65509797
gurglypipe (2018-12-16 18:42:18+00:00): And here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65509797
eggie (2018-12-15 21:41:57+00:00): Dag Binlaveloos.. Je vraagt om een review.
Zelf zou ik het eenduidig houden. Dus alleen de naam op de adresnode zetten en niet nog een keer op het gebouw.
Dat het om het hoofdgebouw gaat kun je wellicht evt. onder description=  kwijt.
MVG,
Eggie
binlaveloos666 (2018-12-16 00:56:30+00:00): Oki, zal ik morgen doen.  Dank je wel.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-16 11:21:14+00:00): Hi Asreid, welcome to OSM.

You removed ways are visible in the satellite imagery. What is the source of your deletion? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65509883
Asreid (2018-12-16 19:38:39+00:00): I am the manager for this piece of state property. Some of the roads I removed do actually exist on the ground and some of them don't. We have had a terrible problem recently with people following map apps and getting off our trails and getting lost. Not only is being off trail dangerous, it is also illegal.
freebeer (2018-12-17 14:41:02+00:00): the way osm works is that if something exists on the ground, it should be mapped.

if there is a reason to prevent access to a track or path, there are access tags that will indicate the legal status, as well as other tags to describe the condition of the trail.  both of these will serve to prevent apps sending people onto the now-deleted-yet-existing roads.

when you say it is dangerous, remember it works two ways.  if a track is visible, it's highly likely that someone without map guidance, like myself, will check it out, like i used to take a different way through the woods each time from one town to another just to explore the possibilities.

when they run into trouble, then there will now be nothing on the map to aid emergency responders in reaching the injured.  that osm around me is so detailed and includes everything has resulted in emergency services preferring it as reference when responding, a status which would not have been reached without constant vigilance between some who want to restrict what osm can include, and those who want to keep it an accurate representation of the world with all its complexities.

the random tracks i checked were untouched import from the census TIGER data, which is known for its mediocre quality, such as positional inaccuracy and failure to include access tags or precise categorisation.  rather than delete this governent data, mappers have been undertaking the herculean task to improve it when shown to be deficient, again a reason to respect the mapping work of others to improve the map, rather than deleting what happens to be inconveniently truthful that you might wish would disappear in reality if deleted from the map.

again, access=private or access=no would be fully adequate to cover the tracks that are off-limits to the general public.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:36:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532392 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Dino Michelini (2018-12-20 12:45:10+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai mappato con shelter un area archeologica. Come mai questa scelta?
sergmauri (2018-12-20 14:12:41+00:00): Ciao, errore dettato dalla stanchezza, sicuramente: ho dovuto eliminare un tracciato con errori pacchiani, probabilmente inventato dato che non aveva alcun riscontro reale (come spesso mi capita sui supramontes!) e, nell'inserire i numerosi ovili presenti, mi son fatto prendere la mano. Ovviamente non si tratta di un riparo, ma di una importantissima e vasta area archeologica con quel che resta di circa cento capanne preistoriche in muratura.
Appena posso correggo.
Grazie
mavl (2018-12-19 16:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65615609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2399].
viloan (2018-12-15 21:36:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dino Michelini (2018-12-20 12:49:16+00:00): Nel nome credo vi sia un errore, forse si tratta di cuile?
sergmauri (2018-12-20 14:23:59+00:00): No, nessun errore. Come forse saprai, in Sardegna esistono decine di modi anche molto differenti per definire le stesse cose; come si suol dire, il sardo è una lingua e non un dialetto...
Mi rifaccio alle indicazioni della segnaletica del luogo, quando la trovo: in questo caso, siamo ad Urzulei, li chiamano Coili...
sergmauri (2018-12-20 14:25:28+00:00): Mi pare non si possano aggiungere gli allegati, altrimenti ti avrei mandato la foto
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532422 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532478 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
skorasaurus (2018-12-16 23:04:22+00:00): hi thanks for editing, but there were a lot of items that you had deleted here. Was that your intention? Were all of these deleted buildings really demolished? If the deletions were unintentional, we'll be able to get them back without redrawing them.
SABiltongHunter (2018-12-16 23:31:24+00:00): Will, I removed them as there were no details, some were just random buildings that were labeled, one was an apartment building with no details and it was my understanding that we don’t label every building unless there is value in labeling it like a business or other area, otherwise every house could be drawn, am I wrong with that understanding?
freebeer (2018-12-17 14:07:55+00:00): you are wrong.

it is the eventual goal of osm to map every building and address throughout the world, for one.  some areas are much further along, while most of the US is lagging maybe a decade or more behind.

your changeset as visualised consists solely of deletions, so it would be possible for me to restore everything with no damage.  i would be happy to do that.

there was only one obviously wrong thing that you deleted, a large building which should have been some area, named Ford; mistakes like that can and should be deleted or better, fixed to be correct.

look around other parts of the country or the world for examples of how the us map will be looking in the coming years as more and more detail gets added.

the buildings without details will eventually get more details like address and more added to them, as osm contributors build upon the work of those who have mapped before them.
SABiltongHunter (2018-12-17 16:20:15+00:00): Ok thanks, I didn't realize that coming over from the Waze editing world. Please restore all those and then I will go remove the Ford one anyway as that dealership is closed. Sorry for the hassle.
iandees (2018-12-17 16:50:16+00:00): SABiltongHunter, I'm curious where you got the impression that untagged buildings should be removed? I'd like to make sure the documentation there is more clear.
freebeer (2018-12-17 17:21:46+00:00): i'd give the ford one a closer look before deleting, it may well be meant to represent the carpark or business boundary.
your revert is underway.
freebeer (2018-12-17 17:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65556784 where the changeset comment is: restore deleted objects at the request of the mapper, resulting from a misunderstanding of osm and its guiding principles that we all hold most holy and sacred and devote ourselves tirelessly to occasionally bothering to think about doing something for
freebeer (2018-12-17 17:39:17+00:00): (a good place to see the density of detail-free residences and other buildings is in Nepal, where i found meself before returning here, by the way)

As i expected, the outline of the large Ford building corresponds well enough to the sales lot, so as i thought, it was a simple beginner mistake.  the same mapper traced an outline of the neighbouring Enterprise auto-rental just west, but failed to add a building= tag to that, so its outline does not appear rendered to the right of these comments, only the icon.

user TweedC should have donated the building tag from the sales lot (which i dont know how to properly tag whether active, or a simple paved lot), to that rental office.

also, before considering deleting an item, please look into the lifecycle prefix, as that will notify armhair mappers like myself that the aerial imagery i used to check, no longer reflects the current revision of reality.

thanks.
skorasaurus (2018-12-17 17:54:53+00:00): Hi Bruce, I didn't recognize your user name ( SABiltongHunter). 
Thanks for your understanding and time that you've dedicated to OSM. 

We take an incremental approach here in that if some information is missing (like the name of the building), that is okay. If you do know additional information and are able to add more details (name, hours of operation, etc) that is always encouraged but it is not required. 

Some good practices are at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

freebeer has assisted with your revert which undid your deletions.
SABiltongHunter (2018-12-17 18:24:28+00:00): Thanks all. Looks like I need to go back and do some more reason, forgot a bunch and/or the changes with my hiatus. One question I have is the comment look into the lifecycle prefix, can you please elaborate for me. Thanks all.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:45:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532519 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:46:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532534 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532552 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
eggie (2018-12-16 07:32:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-16 07:55:11+00:00): Het pad zat nu geplakt aan de landuse forest. Dat heb ik even losgemaakt.
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65510628
MVG,
Eggie
theritz (2018-12-16 14:32:11+00:00): Ja dat was 'm. Blijkbaar nog wat onderschat in hoe makkelijk (of lastiger, blijkbaar ^_^ ) het is om aanpassingen te maken. Het is een doorlopend paadje van de Uraniumweg naar het fietspad langs de Amsterdamseweg.
eggie (2018-12-16 14:44:31+00:00): Oke.. plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alt-toets te gebruiken. Nog beter is het om over te stappen naar editor JOSM.
Dan heb je veel meer controle.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2018-12-19 16:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65615609 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2399].
sergeybe (2018-12-17 09:28:06+00:00): Хватит вандалить, только позоришь свою страну.
mavl (2018-12-17 10:03:10+00:00): Hello Ім'я. This changeset renamed the town ("name" tag is changed). Do you have any proof that this town has this new name in reality? (for example, photo of road sign). OpenStreetMap is map of real objects. Please, see [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice].  
  
Also your changeset has no any comment. Please, add good changeset comments in the future [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments].
surveyor54 (2018-12-15 22:33:02+00:00): Hi,
ich frage mich, warum du bestehende Doppelgaragen löschst, und windschiefe Einzelgaragen einträgst?

Man muss nicht löschen, man kann auch verschieben (Historie).

Du hast kein Respekt vor den Arbeiten deiner Mitmapper.

Aufgrund welcher Quellen hast du die Änderungen durchgeführt.

Ortskenntnis.....?

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2018-12-19 21:41:30+00:00): Hi,

schade, dass du dich nicht meldest um den Sachverhalt zu klären. :(
Himké (2019-07-30 22:40:44+00:00): The university property extends further east. Where is the nursing home?
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:55:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
lyctkel (2021-09-16 09:15:52+00:00): Hallo A67-A67,
Ik kon geen halte vinden op deze locatie. 
Moet het niet dichter bij station Kraayensteinlaan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2141385838) zijn? 
Het is natuurlijk ook mogelijk dat de haltes van de nachtbus lijnen op dit moment niet kunnen worden gevonden, omdat HTM de nachtbus lijnen tijdelijk heeft stopgezet.
(https://www.htm.nl/ons-vervoer/onze-bussen/nachtbus)
Groeten,
lyctkel
A67-A67 (2021-09-16 15:07:55+00:00): Volgens mij zijn de nummers en halteborden meestal niet verwijderd tijdens corona, dus ze zouden er nog moeten staan. Al heb ik ook wel eens een nachtbushalte gezien die alleen een sticker op een lantaarnpaal was.

Het zou inderdaad kunnen dat de halte dichterbij de tramhalte is. Inderdaad is het vervelend dat officiële informatie van HTM op dit moment niet goed beschikbaar is, vanwege de tijdelijke stopzetting van de nachtbussen.
lyctkel (2024-01-27 21:57:51+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat de nachtbussen terugkomen (https://www.omroepwest.nl/nieuws/4797941/nachtbus-gaat-weer-rijden-in-haagse-regio).
Ik hoop dat de halteborden dan  wordt verbeterd en dit probleem kan worden opgelost.
Andreas Binder (2018-12-21 19:38:10+00:00): Wenn 'www.transformap.co' keine Flächen auswertet, dass wäre es besser man teilt diesen Bug den  Seitenbetreibern mit. Stattdessen jetzt für jede Fläche einen zusätzlichen Knoten mit den selben Tags in OSM einzutragen halte ich für Unsinn.
Carlos Brys (2018-12-20 21:03:41+00:00): Quité el área superpuesta del barrio y lo agregué usando las relaciones de las calles
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:54:25+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:55:38+00:00): 大興高中已經用區塊方式繪製了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9126013
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:52:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532623 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:55:03+00:00): Possibly redundant.  The payment:pikepass=* and payment:cash/coins/whatever=* tags provide hints on what payments are accepted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65512557
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532697 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532715 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532784 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532807 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:05:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532823 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532852 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532866 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
MerlinPendragon (2018-12-16 03:50:19+00:00): Hey, just to let you know, most of the paths you added in this changeset don't exist anymore, due to the Mirror Lake renovation.
Владимир К (2019-07-31 16:32:36+00:00): Добрый день!
Хочу уточнить насчет временности изменений. 
конкретно вот тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31124787 motor_vehicle=no и 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368740055 oneway=yes . эти теги не забыты случайно? как проверить, актуальны ли они?
toyotagps (2019-08-03 10:36:29+00:00): Добрый день.
Да, всё актуально.
Sosha1996 (2019-01-22 02:34:39+00:00): من قبلا اضافه کرده بودم. این رو حذف می‌کنم