piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:31:58+00:00): Так как улица у указанным названием не соединяется с другими улицами тоже с указанными названиями, то это распознается как изолят. Из-за большого числа таких случаев не выходит офлайн обновление карт. Для того чтобы этого избежать, нужно либо соединять указанную улицу с более высоким типом дороги ( минор роад и выше)( можно без указания названий) напрямую, либо указывать название улицы ( дороги того же типа что и "конечная"), которая является промежуточной между дорогой более высокого типа и конечной. 
https://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-PER/routing-map
richter_fn (2020-10-22 11:34:17+00:00): Ну вот, например, что нужно сделать конкретно с Шарташской?
richter_fn (2020-10-22 11:39:40+00:00): Ну и это в принципе странно, что она распознаётся как изолят. Какое отношение имя имеет к связности дорожного графа?
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:39:58+00:00): либо удалить название, либо то что я сейчас нарисовал. Не лучшее решение конечно.
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:40:39+00:00): обновите
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:44:12+00:00): само по себе он все равно остается связанным, но якобы некорректно.  Меня это так-то тоже достало. Я удаляю название чисто из-за нехватки времени. По идее надо все норм нарисовать и не удалять.
richter_fn (2020-10-22 11:45:37+00:00): Удалять название совершенно не хочется, ведь оно на самом деле там есть. Искусственно дотягивать дороги классом выше, чтобы удовлетворить валидатор тоже, действительно, выглядит не очень красиво. Но спасибо за разъяснение и фикс. :-)
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:46:38+00:00): Из двух зол: либо обновление вообще в этот раз не выйдет, хотя там было может много других полезных правок, либо я по быстрому это удалю эту часть и все выйдет
Energizer1986 (2020-10-22 11:47:21+00:00): я выбираю меньшее
A67-A67 (2020-10-23 12:02:34+00:00): Hallo Jeroen,
Turbopleinen, rotondes en turborotondes worden geheel in dezelfde wegcategorie gemapt. Het was dus correct.
A67-A67 (2020-10-23 12:07:59+00:00): Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout

Als meerdere dezelfde objecten op dezelfde manier gemapt zijn, kun je er meestal vanuit gaan, dat dat de correcte manier is.
eggie (2020-10-22 12:48:43+00:00): Dag Gisbert,
Wanneer het pad er echt niet meer is dan is het correct gemapt.

MVG,
eggie
DeBigC (2021-07-28 20:32:00+00:00): The Botanic Visitor's Centre, while indeed is a sort of campus of collected buildings is miss-tagged as if a single building here. I am splitting these up. In the meantime it may be worth thinking about if some kind of polygon would be appropriate. That is easily added later if there is something suitable.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-18 08:43:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4238370274/history

why you added delivery=only ?

it makes no sense with shop=clothes
mweper (2026-06-25 22:09:49+00:00): Hola. Perdón por la tardanza, no estoy muy metido últimamente.
Por la pregunta, sinceramente no me acuerdo porque pasó mucho tiempo, pero me imagino que lo habré puesto porque vi que llevaban la ropa al domicilio.
Desconozco el estado actual del negocio.
Saludos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-26 07:10:47+00:00): if it delivers clothes in addition to being a regular shop then it would deliver=yes
eggie (2020-10-22 12:51:47+00:00): Het stond al sinds 2019-05-25 10:25 correct getagd met vehicle=private.. Dat is al alles met wielen. Je tags zijn dus overbodig.
Dus waarom die tagging ?  
vehicle= no of private vangst alles af met wielen in de routering. 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-22 12:47:09+00:00): Wanneer je er echt niet mag fietsen middels een bord zou je beter bicycle=no kunnen taggen. . of vehicle=no om alles met wielen te stoppen. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-22 12:31:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-23 09:48:09+00:00): Dag Jorik
Je vraagt om een review.
Gebouwen kun je in het vervolg beter laten importeren via het forum middels het draadje Verzoek BAG import
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Het gebouw heb ik nu goedgelegd mbv de bgt.
Het adres op de gebouwomtrek heb ik verwijderd. Een adresnode is genoeg.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-10-23 09:49:30+00:00): De info staat nu ook op de adresnode conform afspraken binnen osm.
eggie (2020-10-22 12:35:31+00:00): Dag sehujoza,

Je hebt camping de Meene toegevoegd aan een gebouw. De camping is al getagd.. dus die naam kan beter weg.
je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92893949 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-22 12:42:53+00:00): Camping de Meene verwijderd van gebouw. Niet dubbel taggen svp. 
Wanneer Kampeerhuis de Meene een verblijf is voor toeristen kun je kijken of deze tag erbij kan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house

MVG,
eggie
sehukoza (2020-10-22 20:04:12+00:00): Dank voor de correctie, had er overheen gekeken.
MVG Sehukoza
berndw (2020-11-14 12:20:19+00:00): Hi

abandoned=yes ist für solche Wege sehr ungewöhnlich, ich würde nur eine entsprechende Beschreibung setzen.
smoothness, visibility u.ä. definieren den ausreichend, ein guter Router sollte sich danach richten

Bernd
Boensch80 (2020-11-14 15:53:49+00:00): Hallo Berndw,
ich habe mich halt gefragt, wie man "vergessene" Waldwege am besten mapt. Ich fand diesen Tag recht passend. Da es sich um einen sehr "renaturierten" Weg handelt, den ich keinem normalen Spaziergänger oder Radler empfehle. Kommot scheint diesen Tag tatsächlich nicht zu berücksichtigen.
berndw (2020-11-14 16:53:04+00:00): Deswegen auch mein Hinweis,  access wird immer ausgewertet,  smoothness häufig, visibility wahrscheinlich nur selten. 

Abandoned ist eher etwas zum Lebenszyklus eines Objekts, aber sagt wenig über den realen Zustand aus.
Sparks (2020-12-10 00:19:22+00:00): Greetings.  I just reverted this change.  This road is no longer there due to recent construction.  Thanks!
vsahith (2020-12-10 09:56:59+00:00): Hi , 
Thanks for looking into my edits and making a necessary changes, Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
vsahith.
Sparks (2020-12-10 13:36:06+00:00): No worries, just wanted to let you know why I was making a change to one of your edits.  Wish there was a better way to communicate when roadways go away but are still showing up on imagery.  Thanks for your work!
PT-53 (2020-10-22 15:06:47+00:00): Hallo hiichbinpaul,
ich kann mir nicht so recht vorstellen, daß die von Dir eingezeichneten neuen Gebäude dort - im Vergleich zu den anderen Gebäuden in dem Gebiet - so rießig groß sein sollen.
Dieses Gebäude z.B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862548469/history
soll 64m lang und 25m breit sein.
Bitte schau Dir das - mit den Maxar-Luftbildern als Hintergrund - nochmal an.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-08 07:39:47+00:00): Hallo hiichbinpaul, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du die Gebäude nochmal überarbeiten und / oder antworten würdest.
Grüße
ivanbranco (2024-08-10 08:17:15+00:00): Ciao Gabriele,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/789008196/history/4

qua avevi tolto il nome sbagliato, senza però aggiungere quello corretto. Ora l'area protetta é senza nome. Ti ricordi qual é?
gabriele_sani (2024-08-10 12:16:39+00:00): Purtroppo sulla cartina ufficiale non ha un nome...
bxl-forever (2020-10-23 21:30:32+00:00): Nice initiative.  I can’t think of anything better than amenity=clinic, it was a good choice, then.
Did some minor fixes.  I’ll try to re-use this to add the 3 other ones.
njsmurf1813 (2022-02-08 17:38:19+00:00): still haven't tried these bagels...
wireguy (2022-02-08 18:06:14+00:00): They are very good!
njsmurf1813 (2022-02-09 03:26:36+00:00): Noted!
kapazao (2020-10-22 13:53:15+00:00): Creo que deberías revisar esto último que has hecho, ya que has pasado de cambiar el punto que había de ITV a convertirla en un techo XD.
En todo caso déjala como la tenías antes como todo el área y el edificio es otra cosa a parte dentro de la ITV, no toda la ITV.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92896841
itrivi (2020-10-22 14:50:29+00:00): Leyendo la documentación oficial, un "roof" es un edificio con dos lados abiertos, que es precisamente el caso en este tipo de talleres. Pero lo deshago :-)
El tema es que el área de inspección o se dibuja en OSM, en ninguna de sus modalidades. Algún día pueden cambiarlo, y entonces ya se verá, pero el caso es que no se veía. Otra opción puede ser dejar el área completa para ITV y dentro de él dibujar parking y edificio de taller/oficinas. Parece que es la opción que eligieron cuando dibujaron la ITV de Orgiva (en Los Tablones).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92896841
itrivi (2020-10-22 14:54:59+00:00): Esto de OSM es cojonudo de por sí, y poder ayudar y ser ayudado es ya la repanocha. Gracias, kapazao.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92896841
kapazao (2020-10-22 15:56:06+00:00): El tema de las ITV estuve yo dándole un repaso y añadiendo muchas hace un tiempo, dejándolas bastante completas. Es verdad que algunas creo que quedaron como nodo y otras como área, porque tampoco tenía claro qué era mejor.
Si la quieres pasar de nodo a área está bien si no se pierde el histórico, lo que digo es que la habías puesto como el edificio solo, y este debe ser otro elemento a parte. Sería la ITV como el área exterior y otro edificio techo donde corresponda, sin los datos de la ITV.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92896841
Vinber-Pro (2020-10-23 15:34:40+00:00): Bonjour, attention vous ajoutez un point dans un batiment étant déja qualifié de restaurant.
Exemple ici donc :
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79554490
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8036344618

Cela crée un doublon.
Même situation au niveau du pottoka, j'ai retiré sur le batiment dans son ensemble, peut-être à faire ici également pour Labea

Bonne cartographie
VictorIE (2024-05-17 14:11:58+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7885223616/history

fixme=Could these lovely things be primarily tagged as electricity / telephone junctions?

To date, these are exclusively utility=traffic_signals

I'm not sure if man_made=street_cabinet can be given higher priority than tourism=artwork - that's a thing for OSM.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-28 14:14:52+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you have dragged the border from the west to the east of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7392775466 .  You can see this change at:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92897644
Can you explain why this change was made?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
letihu (2021-02-16 21:06:13+00:00): 117 Punkte für ein Gebäude?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11783152/history
ssuess (2021-02-17 06:49:28+00:00): Für eine Projektarbeit im Bereich Location-based Services (THM) werden die Innenbereiche von Gebäude in OSM erfasst. Verwendet wird das Simple-Indoor-Tagging-Schema https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:33:32+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
muchichka_s (2020-12-19 19:00:58+00:00): Привіт, в цьому наборі змін ви відкинули мої зміни https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91614259, де я додав теґ junction=roundabout без жодних пояснень. До своїх змін я приклав джерело - посилання на mapillary з знаком кільцевої розв'язки. Чи можете ви пояснити причину, чому ви їх відмінили?

Hi, in this changeset you rejected my changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91614259, where I added the junction = roundabout tag without any explanation. To my changes I have attached a reliable source - a link to the mapillary image with the roundabout sign. Can you explain the reason why you discarded them, please?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=MRxL90x6MXTJnDgrZnzcBQ
Kovoschiz (2020-10-22 13:14:23+00:00): Are you sure these are not 2 peaks of the same mountain area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92898245
SteveKite (2020-10-22 13:20:16+00:00): There is only one peak. It was incorrectly located. Can easily be seen on a map with contours.
user_5359 (2020-10-29 06:19:49+00:00): Hello! You added a unknown tag Shape_Leng
 in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.

see https://www.osm.org/way/862576524
magrej (2020-10-29 07:22:07+00:00): Hi,
This tag is not mine and you can simply check that if you look closely at the left segment of the same way (on the other side of the roundabout) because the whole history of that way is contained in that segment. There you can see that the particular tag was added some seven years ago by some other user.

The history on this segment that you are referring to is "inherited" because I had split the way to make some other changes on the roundabout which can be seen in my changeset comment. This is a very common situation you should be aware of in order not to get confused, just check the history for the other segments.

Best,
magrej
kapazao (2020-10-22 13:54:49+00:00): Hello, the official name is Almegíjar ;D.
Thank you for your contributions in the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92898760
Warin61 (2020-11-08 01:17:05+00:00): Hi,
The name tag is for the name only. Not to describe what has already been tagged. e.g. name Basketball Court should not be used unless you know that is the true name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
JayTurnr (2020-12-28 18:35:36+00:00): Just spotted this. Good edit! Surprised people still use Potlatch in 2020 given the death of Flash :P
Marych_ (2020-10-23 05:26:34+00:00): Dear ennui3000,
XXX in name is not a spam. I've used this name to show on offline map that we don't know the name of this object. We hope that offline users (maps.me; osmand & etc) give us feedback what is correct name.
ennui3000 (2020-10-23 09:25:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

The names should be restricted to the name of the item in question only and should not include additional information not contained in the official name such as categories, types, descriptions, addresses, refs, or notes.
nevw (2020-10-22 22:32:06+00:00): Hi
welcome to OSM.
Adding a name to a road node is not suitable.
I have reverted your change.
Please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700
or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
Geo-Tobi (2020-11-07 07:50:46+00:00): Die Umsetzung des neu eingezeichneten Fußweges an der Sportparkstraße ist falsch. Es gibt dort an mehreren Stellen keinen derartigen Fußweg. Bitte sorgfältiger vorgehen. 
Allgemein ist aus meiner Sicht für Straßenbegleitende Gehwege "Sidewalk=no/both/right/left" die bessere Variante, da es die Karten nicht überfrachtet. Dies ist aber ausdrücklich nur meine Meinung. Das Wiki äußert sich dazu nicht konkret.
gendy54 (2020-10-24 22:39:38+00:00): Bonsoir,

Merci pour l'ajout de la caserne. une petite précision cependant: il ne faut pas mettre de tag building sur le contour du terrain, puisque ce n'est pas un bâtiment. Il ne doit être présent que sur les bâtiments.
Sinon le Sdis, ce n'est pas le nom de la caserne, c'est l'opérateur ;)

Bonne cartographie.
Donat alias gendy54
gendy54 (2020-10-24 22:42:09+00:00): J'ai oublié une chose.
Quand tu mets un nœud avec un numéro d'adresse, marque le nom de la voie avec sinon la base OSM ne sait pas à quelle voie le rajouter. Du coup, ta contribution n'est pas exploitable.
Ex: le n°2 de la caserne
wireguy (2020-10-22 14:31:24+00:00): Hi Jack, welcome to OSM!   Instead of deleting the way, you can add access=private.   The way was added by Amazon, probably to assist their drivers in delivery of packages.
OnewayJack (2020-10-22 14:43:51+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. The driveway is being misused and the residents would like it removed. Besides it is not Morris Lane. It is an easement that provides access to a flagged lot
wireguy (2020-10-22 14:51:04+00:00): Someone may just add it back.
You can add access=no.
OnewayJack (2020-10-22 15:24:45+00:00): Totally agree someone could re-add it.  However, this is not a street.  Morris Lane concludes at the vertex with Taft Street. It is a driveway.
Tax Map can be viewed at:
https://oprs.co.monmouth.nj.us/oprs/TaxBoard/TaxMap.aspx

Wall Township
2014
Page: 25
wireguy (2020-10-22 15:33:41+00:00): A driveway in osm is tagged  highway=service, service=driveway, and then you can add access=no.
OnewayJack (2020-10-22 16:00:46+00:00): My edit is appropriate and accurate. I will leave it as is.

Thanks.
Supaplex030 (2021-06-09 19:09:23+00:00): Hallo Berlin53, ist zwar schon eine Weile her, aber du hast hier an der Neuen Späthstraße/Neue Spätzbrücke vor einigen Monaten straßenbegleitende Wege entfernt und dabei eine wichtige Verbindung gekappt (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2705517).

Wollte dich nur darauf aufmerksam machen – aber frage mich auch, warum du den Weg überhaupt gelöscht hast..?
Berlin53 (2021-06-10 16:41:07+00:00): Sorry, so richtig kann ich es jetzt natürlich auch nicht mehr nachvollziehen. Soweit ich mich erinnere, waren die Radwege durchgängig getrennt vom Fahrweg eingezeichnet, was sie hier aber definitiv nicht sind. Habe da wohl vergessen, die Verbindung zur Straße zu setzten.
Dimitar155 (2021-09-19 20:15:18+00:00): Hi Nick,

You've done a great job! If you are going to add any other information like addresses and street names, make sure that they are in Bulgarian. 

Cheers,
Dimitar155
BlackyP8 (2021-05-05 19:02:13+00:00): das gleiche wie bei:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92903544
BlackyP8 (2021-05-05 19:01:21+00:00): Hallo TomatenTom,

die Zugangsbeschränkung hier ist etwas merkwürdig.
Bei access=no ist motor_vehicle=no überflüssig. Außerdem würde das Tagging Pferde verbieten. Als ich das letzte mal dort war konnte ich solche Schilder nicht sehen.
Sind da aktuell Zugangsbeschränkungsschilder vorhanden? Ansonsten würde highway=path ohne Zugangstags genügen.

LG

BlackyP8
TomatenTom (2021-05-05 19:06:47+00:00): Hi, sorry wenn ich da was falsches oder überflüssiges beschrieben habe. Für mich ist das alles noch ganz neu und ich fuchse mich erst frisch durch. 

LG

Tom
BlackyP8 (2021-05-05 19:12:05+00:00): Hi,

kein Problem, ich schreib dir am besten per PM.

LG

BlackyP8
TomatenTom (2021-05-05 19:14:23+00:00): Ja, mach das mal . 

Danke
literan (2020-10-22 19:02:53+00:00): добрый день. Вы внесли какие-то кривые контуры без тегов. Придется откатить, непонятно, что это
Rom1 (2020-10-22 17:35:21+00:00): Hi, please dont't add area=yes see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92833650 Thanks
daderkina (2020-10-22 18:53:34+00:00): Hi! Ok, thanks!
This news unsettled me a little, as I thought it meant polygons, not lines. But okay, I'll keep in mind for the future edits
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:09:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799798006/history has barrier=G that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier?
gileri (2020-10-22 16:41:50+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure why those restrictions are necessary, as it is a oneway coming from an "interstate". Can you enlighten me please ?
_2bikes (2020-10-22 17:04:50+00:00): It currently says that it's OK for foot traffic and bicycles.  This is not the case.

The website Wandrer.Earth uses OpenStreetMaps to track which roads a cyclist has ridden.  If it's an interstate, it makes it impossible for a cyclist to obtain 100% of a city/zone.
gileri (2020-10-22 17:44:57+00:00): Thank you for your answer !

>It currently says that it's OK for foot traffic and bicycles. This is not the case.

Not really, you cannot reach this OSM way from anywhere with a bike.

It's a shame that games like Wandrer.Earth don't do a bit of routing to solve those cases, instead of relying on contributors adding bicycle=no on already inaccessible ways in OSM.
gileri (2020-10-22 17:45:45+00:00): I assume that's also the case for ways behind a private gate on OSM ?
_2bikes (2020-10-22 17:55:13+00:00): But it was not inaccessible on OSM - it was listed as OK for foot, cycle, and horses.  That is why I edited it :) 

Yes, I have indicated some segments on OSM that are behind private gates.   One is a school.  The other is a company.  Several are private driveways.
Grass-snake (2020-10-22 15:38:09+00:00): Сорри, это дом 12. И да, в нём 119 квартир, а не 120 как в других домах этого типового проекта. В 4-м подъезде на 1 квартиру меньше.
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-20 01:49:46+00:00): Hi, Palolo, thank you for your mapping contribution. I saw the tertiary highway crossing with a reservoir (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/862761896). should I add an embankment to the highway, or do you have any suggestions? thank you and happy mapping
limes11 (2020-10-22 15:51:06+00:00): Why did you remove the oneway=yes tag?
limes11 (2020-10-25 11:12:13+00:00): Please elaborate on your actions. I will revert otherwise.
hemasvn (2020-10-26 04:07:20+00:00): Hi Limes11,
Apologies for the delay in reply, I have made the edit based on available Mapillary overlay (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=a9-qjdOw5LYZOEzZUdFPlw&focus=photo)  according to the sign board the directions apply from the junction. also the Previous oneway was restricting right turn from (Wilhelmstraße to Bahnhofstraße). Kindly, let me know if i am missing out on anything. Always happy to learn from community and improve our edits.

Regrds, 
Hema
limes11 (2020-10-26 15:59:38+00:00): Hello, 

I don't quite understand what this Mapillary photo has to do with the situation. It shows that way 134243092 is oneway and that 642621824 is oneway. 
Formally, 861070474 is not oneway but entry is forbidden for cars since both turning right from Wilhelmsstrasse and turning left from Bahnhofsallee is forbidden for motor vehicles. To indicate this, I added a very short oneway section, just 2-3 meters. That's common practice in such situations. Also, thanks to oneway:bicycle=no, bicycles can enter way 861070474. 

What do you think? 

Best, Limes
limes11 (2020-10-26 16:01:02+00:00): It's funny, one step back on Mapillary, on picture 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=yqrH-NPXPgLHEGXLC7HunA&focus=photo&lat=50.67753088795761&lng=7.19443064344894&z=17

you can see a silver car that goes from left to right illegally !!
hemasvn (2020-10-27 04:20:44+00:00): Hi Limes, 
Thanks for your detailed feedback. As mentioned by you formally 861070474 is not a one way. but based on lane markings the entry is prohibited, So would you suggest us to make a small part one way in these situations or should we add relations of " No left turn" or "No right Turn". 
Kindly, let us know your feedback on this.
Regards, 
Hema
limes11 (2020-10-27 07:52:18+00:00): Ok. So, I put that small one-way piece back in, maybe 2 meters. I think this is by far the easiest solution to handle this also because it offers a nice solution for the bicycle situation using oneway:bicycle=no. 

Thank you and best, 
Limes