piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lokalfuerst (2024-01-06 15:16:31+00:00): Hi Andreas,

Danke fuer deinen Hinweis. 

In dem Editor Vespucci fuer Android, den ich überwiegend verwende, fand ich fuer die Gegend nur Luftbilder von Esry. Dort ist selbst heute der neue Kreisel noch nicht sichtbar. Deinem Hinweis folgend habe ich jetzt eine aktuelle Sicht bei 'Hesse COP20' ein aktuelles Bild gefunden. Das Mapping sieht gut aus!

Was Abbiegespuren angeht, kann ich dir empfehlen, dich mal damit auseinanderzusetzen. Es ist nicht schwer. Vollständige Erfassung erleichtert das Führen eines Fahrzeuges sehr, gerade in komplexen Situationen, wie beispielsweise mehrspurige und stark befahrene  Autobahnen. Man kann sich dann frühzeitig orientieren. 
   
Frohes Mappen!
kasmar00 (2021-05-06 14:49:13+00:00): Czy w tym miejscu faktycznie jest wydzielona i oznaczona dedytkowana ścieżka konna? Na zdjęciach lotniczych widać jedynie drogę oznaczoną jako Nadwarciańska
nanzop (2021-05-06 14:56:52+00:00): Tak, jest szlak konny wzdłuż nadwarciańskiej.
nanzop (2021-05-06 14:57:22+00:00): wiem o nim z osobistej wizyty przy tym szlaku
rthik007 (2021-04-27 07:14:46+00:00): Hi mapbeks_chen,
dragged the NODE: 2094368610
and fix the alignment of primary road
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103682506
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103613454
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-26 15:03:15+00:00): I would propose to reconsider name of related:wikipedia as it may encourage people putting stuff like related:wikipedia=en:Building on every single building mapped in the city

maybe on_the_list:wikipedia?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-26 15:03:29+00:00): (for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266892310/history )
tux67 (2023-02-26 17:32:11+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

good Idea to have a common approach for links to wikipedia lists - but there are a lot of them I have not initially added. Nevertheless, the information for me is worth being kept as these specific buildings with a cultural, architectural and historical named by the regional government. 

Most of them are tagged with "wikipedia". I can't remember based on which direction I changed this one. If we find a commonly accepted approach, I would support to retag those in the region. (as far as I can see, the user "gepeix" added them initially). 

BR
tux67
abrensch (2021-04-27 16:36:10+00:00): soll das so ?

http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/50.74022/8.28350/standard&lonlats=8.282903,50.74037;8.283773,50.739795&profile=car-eco

Gruss, Arndt
Lokalfuerst (2021-10-02 13:26:01+00:00): Arndt,
ich verstehe die Frage nicht. 
Wuerde sagen, soll so sein.
Zwei Spuren.
Gruss
abrensch (2021-10-02 14:12:40+00:00): Deinen Einbahn-Fehler hatte ich zwichenzeitlich selbst korrigiert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103945334

Gruss, Arndt
Rogoyski (2021-08-02 19:11:17+00:00): Co ma oznaczać motor_vehicle=permissive na Chmielnej?
Awizonosz (2021-08-02 20:18:29+00:00): Na tej ulicy nie ma znaku iż piesi maja pierwszeństwo
Rogoyski (2021-08-02 22:11:01+00:00): Aż pójdę zobaczyć, jaki jest znak. Ale permissive wciąż mi nie pasuje, to oznacza, że właściciel może w każdej chwili postawić płot, bramę albo tabliczkę z napisem "zakaz wstępu", co jest w oczywisty sposób niemożliwe na drodze publicznej, jaką jest Chmielna. Gdyby nie było zakazu wjazdu nieuzasadnione byłoby w ogóle highway=pedestrian.
◪ Jarv (2021-04-26 22:48:02+00:00): I've had a look at mapillary and there doesn't appear to be a right turn or u-turn restriction here.
This just seems like a place where doing a right turn/u-turn is very unlikely and such the junction isn't designed for it, rather than it being explicitly not allowed
GEOIG (2021-04-27 06:08:34+00:00): Thomas Jarvis, thank you for your attentiveness. I checked again and undo the wrong edit.
Filip009 (2022-05-11 15:10:38+00:00): Dobrý deň, aký je zdroj daného cyklochodníka?
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-26 08:45:17+00:00): Bonjour, 
On évitera de mettre une croix si vous ne connaissez pas la capacité de l'aire de pique nique. Sinon, on mettra un nombre. 
Belle journée à vous, 
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103616526
OT Aire Eugénie (2021-04-26 08:50:35+00:00): D'accord, c'est noté ! Merci 
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103616526
mapuit (2021-04-26 21:37:20+00:00): Hi -Dennis-,
du hast hier für den Name-Tag Namen verwendet, die eher nach einer Beschreibung als nach einem wirklich angeschriebenen Namen klingen. Darüber hinaus wäre ein Spielplatz mit leisure=playground zu taggen.
Stehen hier a) wirklich Schilder  mit "Skateranlage" und "Spielplatz" und b) ist letzteres eine Sportanlage?
Beste Grüße
mapvid
-Dennis- (2021-04-27 05:25:24+00:00): Hi mapvid, 
die Bezeichnung der 3 "Anlagen" habe ich schlicht aus der Webcam Seite der Gemeinde übernommen.

Leisure habe ich angepasst. 

Zu a): da stehen Schilder ja, beim Spielplatz denke ich nicht, aber wie erwähnt, Webcam Seite. 
Zu b): Ich weiß jetzt nicht genau was du meinst? Der Spielplatz ist ein Spielplatz, da steht nirgends Sportanlage. 

https://www.bindlach.de/webcams

Grüße 
Dennis
aharvey (2021-04-26 12:00:36+00:00): Actually in this case you can set the building type as semi, I just updated this one so you can see.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103618237
pio2_122 (2021-04-26 08:52:52+00:00): Proszę nie łączyć granic z innymi obiektami (i nie zmieniać ich przebiegu). W tym przypadku było to połączenie granicy z brzegiem rzeki. Jest niezgodne z oficjalnym przebiegiem granicy.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-04-26 10:13:46+00:00): Hi AasmaK,
please learn how to straighten buildings by pressing "Q".
AasmaK (2021-04-26 10:28:49+00:00): Thank you. Appreciate it.
chnav (2021-05-16 09:09:57+00:00): Hi, can you please explain mass deletion of tag pk (Post Kilometre) on milestones and where you discussed this automated edits. Thanks.
willisturm (2021-05-19 07:44:37+00:00): Hi chnav,
these are no automated edits. I check every single node. Please look at the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pk . There you will find the answer: "Consider to use distance=* tag instead".
Have an nice day.
eggie (2021-04-26 09:04:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
trigpoint (2021-04-29 14:31:21+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit however names should be only used for the actual name of an object and not for descriptions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Cheers Phil
BiviBag_ADV (2021-04-29 17:51:06+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. This was neither an object, nor a description. It was a Changeset Comment which you seem to have misread
trigpoint (2021-04-29 18:17:44+00:00): I was commenting on name='Public Convenience' which is a description.
eggie (2021-04-26 09:07:56+00:00): Dag Nölke  Je fietspad heeft geen verbinding met de Tangweg .. Dus zal niet routeren.
Op een fietspad hoeft geen bicycle=yes
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-06-18 10:49:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag highways in accordance with the wiki for highways in Africa
Roads connecting settlements are not to be tagged  as residential or track. in this area
Best regards and keep maping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 09:21:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102992346, 102993689, 102994563, 102995104.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-26 09:44:53+00:00): Nothing failed revert
Bausparfuchs (2021-04-26 09:42:06+00:00): cycleway:both applies only for official cycleway. A oneway with "fahrrad frei" has to be addressed by using oneway:bicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103621098
user_2066394 (2021-05-02 15:02:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122778444

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103996745
Bausparfuchs (2021-04-26 09:42:41+00:00): that changeset does not seem to contain any changes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103623426
Bausparfuchs (2021-04-26 09:46:24+00:00): well found the way in the other editor. strange thatr it dioes not appear here in the changeset view on osmcha.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103623426
Swic (2023-12-12 11:12:58+00:00): Salut la team Geovelo,

Il y a une barrière ici, mais les piétons peuvent-ils passer ? Node: 4318888924

Merci :)
vrmap (2021-04-27 16:22:34+00:00): Ciao Davide,
volevo chiederti perchè con questo changeset hai tolto il tratto tra Brescia e Cassano d'Adda della ciclovia AIDA  
(relazione 11733679)?
danbjoseph (2021-11-02 00:22:42+00:00): please be sure to trace individual buildings outlines, and not large blobs.
marczoutendijk (2021-04-26 13:08:42+00:00): Please don't use "UNIQUE ID" (or any other spelling, but use ref:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Ser9ei (2021-04-28 16:59:34+00:00): Remove the extra point on the contour and press Q key to make angles right.
user_8655426 (2021-04-26 09:51:17+00:00): こんばんは。
北海道内の広範囲にわたり、相当な数の太陽光発電所を追加されていますが、これらは現地調査を行ったうえでの編集でしょうか？ 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/きたきつね/history

OpenStreetMap へ転載できない情報をデータソースとしている疑いがあります。
・利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764
・データの情報源 「ウェブ上で見つかるほとんどのデータには著作権があります。絶対に著作権があるリソースを使わないでください。」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

発電所の名称、位置情報、発電量、operator の編集のもととなった情報源を教えてください。よろしくお願いします。
(ダイレクト・メッセージに対する応答がないため、他のコミュニティ・メンバーのコメントや対応を期待し、全世界に公開される「変更セットの議論」にもコメントさせていただきました。返信はこの変更セットにお願いいたします。)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 09:52:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 103199637, 103200207, 103200414, 103200538, 103201115, 103201763, 103202640.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-26 10:00:54+00:00): Nothng failed revert
BCNorwich (2021-04-27 07:47:32+00:00): Hi, You've got different levels joined together which is obviously wrong.

Are the apartments flats above the shops for ordinary domestic letting or
tourism apartments for holiday let? There is a difference to the use and tagging is different. Also, an apartment is not a room so the room tag ought be removed.

Regards Bernard.
Bausparfuchs (2021-05-02 18:45:40+00:00): does the tag surface=mud really apply here? is the path muddy all the time? If only muddy after rainfall as a lot of paths are anyway, surface=ground would be better. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmud
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103625591
Gruwe (2021-05-03 08:34:32+00:00): Yes, you're right, ground fits better! Changed to ground.
limes11 (2021-04-26 19:26:09+00:00): Hi,

ich habe das formal korrigiert. Es muss

access:conditional=no @ ...

heissen. 

Viele Gruesse, 

Limes
cyton (2021-04-26 10:09:04+00:00): Danke
algot (2021-05-07 10:07:28+00:00): Назви в тегах name не повинні описувати об'єкт, а повинні бути саме назвами
"Бугор" це неправильна назва
eggie (2021-04-26 10:45:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback  Realiseer  je dat elke test ook daadweerkelijk in de data van OSM komt.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
R3gi (2021-04-27 09:43:21+00:00): Ahoj,
vypadá to, že jsi při úpravách budov některé vedle sebe postavené budovy rozpojil a některé v reálu kolmé (hranaté) stěny zešikmil.
Předpokládám, že úpravy byly provedeny dle katastrální mapy, která úplně neodpovídá skutečnosti.
Mohl by ses na to prosím ještě podívat a provést opravu? Díky ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103627014
adamos (2021-04-27 09:59:56+00:00): Ahoj,

ano, dle katastrální mapy, RUIAN a kontroloval jsem dle orotfotomapy Prahy. Jestli jsem zanesl do mapy nepřesnost, tak mě to mrzí. Co konkrétně nesedí? Díky Adam
adamos (2021-04-27 10:24:38+00:00): Poupravil jsem, co jsem našel. Adam
R3gi (2021-04-27 10:56:03+00:00): Díky, vypadá to dobře. Hlavní je podle mě aby ty budovy byly k sobě spojené, pokud jsou v reálu těsně na sobě. Při vykreslování v některých aplikacích to pak totiž vypadá ošklivě, některé editory to přímo označují za chybu a teoreticky by tam některé navigace mohly v krajních případech zkoušet vést cestu.
Ještě jednou díky a mapování zdar :-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103627014
highflyer74 (2021-04-27 09:59:53+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Sei so nett, vor dem Hochladen einen entsprechenden Änderungssatzkommentar in das Feld einzutragen, damit andere besser verstehen, was Deine Absicht war. Weitere Informationen dazu gibt es hier:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Mache Dich ein wenig mit OSM vertraut, bevor Du komplexere Dinge angehst. Lies Dir dazu am besten folgendes durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Die Bremer Community trifft sich einmal im Monat (zur Zeit nur online --> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community). Neue Mapper(innen) sind immer willkommen. Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern bei mir oder jedem anderen erfahreneren Mapper. Danke!
Abraham Martin (2021-04-26 10:19:11+00:00): Photos from: https://www.facebook.com/groups/871498022968668/permalink/3780543755397399/
Hungerburg (2021-04-27 10:43:41+00:00): Hallo advfreak, üblich scheint hier, Adresse am Haus/Gebäude; die extra Adressknoten können dann wohl weg… Ich seh, da fehlen noch ein paar Häuser ;)
advfreak (2021-04-27 13:42:47+00:00): Ja der Knoten kann eigentlich weg, die Häuser die du vermutlich meinst sind alte Ställe, die gehören zu den jeweiligen Höfen dazu und haben keine Hausnummern. :)
Hungerburg (2021-04-27 19:00:03+00:00): Ich meinte nicht die Schuppen von 36 und 37, sondern Nummern 26b,c,d - da fehlen nicht die Adressen, sondern die Häuser ;)
advfreak (2021-04-28 07:34:02+00:00): Hmmm, im tiris maps sind b und d drinnen. C weiß ich nicht, vielleicht noch im Bau? Müsste mal hinauf schauen bei Gelegenheit, in der Ecke bin ich nur alle 3 Jahre mal. :)
advfreak (2021-04-28 07:35:31+00:00): Nr. 38 ist auch kein Gasthof, da ist eine Tischlerei drinnen... :P
elfronto (2021-04-27 08:41:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Le marquage de cette portion comme zone de rencontre supprime la continuité de la D25. Est-ce qu'il existe un tag secondaire qui permet de définir une route départementale comme zone de rencontre ?
Bonne journée.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 11:00:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102504393, 102504585, 102505575, 102505600, 102505769, 102512440, 102512479, 102512521, 102512659, 102512764, 102513493, 102597169, 102597226, 102598032, 102599635, 102599692, 102599784, 102600122, 102600330, 102600591, 102600635, 102600675, 102601001, 102601042, 102601117, 102601156, 102604960, 102605012, 102605048, 102605073, 102605091, 102605158, 102605723, 102605792, 102605864, 102605925, 102606021, 102606089, 102606123, 102606180, 102606298, 102606342, 102606382, 102606417, 102606504, 102606599, 102606662, 102606719, 102606757, 102606779, 102606839, 102606899, 102607189, 102607249, 102607359, 102607407, 102607512, 102607611, 102607736, 102607801, 102607910, 102607964, 102608054, 102608263, 102608303, 102608355, 102608397, 102608469, 102608539, 102608635, 102608702, 102608763, 102608965, 102609341, 102609373, 102609402, 102609429, 102609460, 102609531, 102609747, 102609841, 102609897, 102609958, 102610051, 102610250, 102610767, 102610914, 102611105, 102611547, 102612584, 102612937, 102613393, 102662719, 102663167, 102675740, 102675766, 102675796, 102675988, 102713915, 102713935, 102713948, 102713958, 102714010, 102714035, 102714062, 102714119, 102714152, 102714167, 102714202, 102714229, 102714246, 102714300, 102714322, 102714342, 102714387, 102714435, 102714464, 102714480, 102714517, 102714536, 102714641, 102714655, 102714682, 102714736, 102714775, 102714815, 102714847, 102714887, 102714914, 102714943, 102714986, 102715225, 102715234, 102715251, 102715273, 102717239, 102717251, 102717275, 102717295, 102717316, 102717338, 102717356, 102717367, 102717390, 102717401, 102717414, 102717424, 102717441, 102717456, 102717502, 102717579, 102717611, 102717622, 102717659, 102717685, 102717713, 102717734, 102717797, 102717934, 102717951, 102717973, 102717990, 102718038, 102718052, 102718071, 102718087, 102718101, 102719861, 102719878, 102719882, 102719892, 102719921, 102719946, 102720011, 102720039, 102720059, 102720065, 102720072, 102720081, 102720156, 102720227, 102720306, 102720351, 102720416, 102720459, 102720479, 102753188, 102753396, 102753639, 102753851, 102754227, 102754517, 102754543, 102754570, 102754593, 102754625, 102754772, 102754803, 102760541, 102760580, 102760604, 102760626, 102760652, 102760670, 102760677, 102760712, 102828555, 102828598, 102828639, 102828656, 102828724, 102828770, 102829028, 102829122, 102829247, 102829271, 102829292, 102829387, 102829407, 102829472, 102829620, 102829662.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-26 11:21:54+00:00): 14 way update revert fails have all been validly updated by other mappers.
Xevi (2021-10-20 05:54:20+00:00): IMPRACTICABLE no es un nom del cami, si no es pot passar el millor es no marcar-lo o indicar-ho amb altres etiquetes, el camp name nomes es per el nom del cami
trial (2026-03-10 22:31:48+00:00): I guess you meant 10.5 here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/451715371/history 

circumference 	1050 meters ?
menganito (2026-03-11 07:04:26+00:00): You're right, I thought it was supposed to be in cm. Fixed now.
trial (2026-03-11 08:07:48+00:00): Thanks, yes other similar tags are in cm, but not this one.
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-04-27 21:51:44+00:00): salut l'ami,
j'ai recalé la géométrie en utilisant Maxar ;-)
Cyrille37 (2021-04-28 05:58:30+00:00): Bien vu :-) Merci JL
McPomHH (2021-04-27 05:41:37+00:00): Hallo Helmuth, bitte verwende für Veränderungen an Buslinien nicht den Openstreetmap Editor iD - er kann Buslinien entsprechend der PTv2 nicht korrekt mappen. Danke.
berndw (2021-04-26 10:38:24+00:00): Ist natürlich in Rheinbrohl
willisturm (2021-04-29 08:29:15+00:00): Hi Belseybob,
the tag highway=byway is deprecated. Please have a look on Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbyway
Have a nice day.
FraukeLeo (2021-07-24 09:01:15+00:00): Hi Olikos, bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name beherzigen. Das hier ist eindeutig kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung.
Ebenso "Geplantes Gewerbegebiet" nördlich davon.
user_5359 (2021-04-26 15:02:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Filip009 (2022-02-25 10:06:47+00:00): Dobrý deň, do budúcnosti prosím nič nekopírujte z cykloportálu. Môžete však odtiaľ načerpať inšpiráciu a tú trasu si prejsť v realite. Majú tam totiž copyright a tým pádom môže byť Vaša zmena revertnutá t.j. cyklotrasa môže byť odstránená.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-04-26 13:02:24+00:00): Jorge, percebi que você removeu as vias internas de dentro do shopping, porque fez isso? Não parece uma edição correta.
PaoloTRN (2021-04-30 05:25:55+00:00): è presente il cartello stradale blu che indica "percorso unico pedonale e ciclabile".
كولومبوس_Columbus (2021-04-28 00:01:02+00:00): نبداء في الربع الخالي يا حبيشان
frozenrabi (2021-05-07 05:21:08+00:00): Please map using Maxar Premium Imagery and also please notice contour to see the direction of river flow.
Mikel Ortega (2021-04-26 17:21:44+00:00): Why?
Reverted in #103652528
DaveF (2021-04-28 18:08:43+00:00): Hi
Single objects don't need to be Multi Polygons.
Mikel Ortega (2021-04-26 17:25:16+00:00): This edition is wrong.
Reverted in #103652765
AWaltrick (2022-11-02 02:24:02+00:00): Prezado BridalveilFall
Fiz uma correção no traçado da via pela alteração 128368612, onde a estrada estava sem acesso para nenhum tipo de veículo conforme verificado em campo em 01/11/2022.
Abraços
RiverBearings (2022-11-02 23:41:02+00:00): Olá AWaltrick, BridalveilFall não está mais na Apple Data Team. Mas obrigado por sua mensagem e por fazer esta correção. Bom mapeamento!

Hello AWaltrick, BridalveilFall is no longer with the Apple Data Team. But thank you for your message and for making this correction. Happy mapping!
geo_roads (2021-04-30 22:27:29+00:00): Hi Ghassen, thank you for mapping. Generally roundabouts are mapped as normal highway types rather than links. This is also written about on the OSM wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Roundabouts 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag
Ghassen Aouinti (2021-05-03 13:36:21+00:00): Thanks for your remarks i really appreciate it. Here it is a quite complicated but OSM docs is so clear
geo_roads (2021-05-03 23:19:11+00:00): Thanks for the response. Happy mapping.
mavl (2021-04-27 14:30:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил существующее здание и на его место добавил здание неправильного размера.  
Этот пакет правок был отменён.  
Пожалуйста, не удаляйте правильные данные.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
opendcc (2021-04-27 11:49:09+00:00): visite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name

cdmt Wolfgang
kartonage (2021-04-27 18:54:22+00:00): Hej,

around here there have been a lot of empty ways mapped by you. I would suggest either not uploading work in progress objects and virtual lines or using the changeset comment with a human readable explanation so other mappers and the local community know what you are doing.

Thanks
Best regards
Michael Montani (2021-04-28 06:42:41+00:00): Hi kartonage,
UNGSC_Olga is a paid mapper of the Unite Maps initiative https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unite_Maps_Initiative run by the UNGSC.
I alerted her on not uploading empty ways while still not member of the relation: the idea is that they will belong to multipolygon relations to map landcover and landuse for topographic maps in support of UN peacekeeping missions. I will also guide her to put a description in her profile saying she is a paid mapper, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Also, she will add more detailed changeset comments.

Thank you
Johnwhelan (2021-08-15 22:06:03+00:00): according to the African highway wiki a highway connecting two settlements is never a track.  Probably an unclassified.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
DF45 (2021-08-16 10:59:11+00:00): Hi,
I didn't quite understand your comment, but saw you dropped and recreated the highway.
For me there was no point in commenting the changeset as long as you enhance the Map as you do.
Best regards,
DF45
InfosReseaux (2021-04-29 22:36:56+00:00): Bonsoir et merci pour votre contribution

Je comprends que vous avez essayé d'ajouter l'infirmerie du Lycée Berthollet qui apparaît bien sur la carte.
Néanmoins vous avez également ajouté d'autres attributs aux bâtiments qui semblent ne pas devoir se trouver là. Par exemple railway=narrow_gauge indiquant la présence d'une voie ferrée sur le pourtour de l'établissement.

Pouvez-vous m'expliquer et éventuellement corriger ceci s'il vous plaît ?
Bonne soirée
rskedgell (2021-04-26 18:50:04+00:00): When you say "latest street map images", what is the source of these: Bing Streetside, Mapillary, or something else?
123FakeSt (2021-04-26 18:52:04+00:00): From Google Street View, November 2020: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Eastman+Dental+Hospital+(Stop+HB)/@51.5268483,-0.1181675,3a,41.2y,127.68h,88.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbIVG3e2-kkhx3n2CdiiBfw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!4m5!3m4!1s0x48761b380bf09ef1:0x7cca28da4c9d05b7!8m2!3d51.5259698!4d-0.117395