piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robin007 (2017-01-06 22:37:26+00:00): Witam,
OK.
PS. Odblokowałem fragment Ołtaszyńskiej od strony Zwycięskiej - do Stajennej, bo skoro Stajenna zostaje jednokierunkowa, to musi przynajmniej tam być przejezdna.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-01-09 08:33:38+00:00): Tak, wjazd w Malinową również jest zablokowany. Ruchu nie ma na odcinku od Wojszyckiej do Malinowej i na skrzyżowaniu Ołtaszyńskiej z Malinową. Dalej na południe Ołtaszyńska jest przejezdna. 
Pozdrawiam
westnordost (2017-01-03 23:02:40+00:00): Hi Saturngod

I noticed that you split the Pyay road with oneway=no in two roads with each oneway=yes (and I think others too).

This is correct if and only if the two opposite lanes are physically separate from each other, for example by a grass strip, trees or by a concrete barrier. 
The implication is that it is impossible to cross from one lane to the other except where explicitly a connection is made.
To illustrate at the example of Pyay road, coming from Ma Kyee Kyee Street or Mahar Myaing Street, this would mean that you can only turn right, driving south. Same with Ma Po Street or Shan Kone Street.

It is not correct if the separation between these lanes is only a road marking.

This is actually an important detail, as it very much affects the routing for navigation software.

So, to wrap it up: from the Bing satellite imagery, it looks like the separation is only a road marking, which would mean that your change is wrong. If you know for sure from a different source that the lanes are truly separate (i.e. because your surveyed it yourself or saw a current photo), then I'd recommend to write this into your changeset comment in order to keep others from eventually reverting it because they think it is an error.

(For example the U Wisara Road just North East of Pyay Road is correctly split up into two seperate oneway roads because there are tree rows between the lanes.)

Cheers
Tobias
Saturngod (2017-01-04 01:59:25+00:00): Hi Tobias, 

Now, I live in Yangon. In Yangon, most of the road are separated with Cement Block. So, not allow to U Turn to cross other side. Current GPS system is showing because it's not separated lane. It always make me wrong direction. 

Yesterday, I drive there and I can confirm it. I cannot do U turn to cross other side.I need to pass Hanthawaddy Circle to do U Turn.
westnordost (2017-01-04 12:06:26+00:00): Cool, thanks for clearing it up!
When you are using JOSM, you can specify explicitly the source of the data you are committing (i.e. "survey"). In iD, this info can go into the normal comment.
By the way, I can really recommend JOSM, it is very useful for power users.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-17 10:11:59+00:00): Ich nehme mal, das Verschieben von http://osm.org/node/4581726285 um fast 600 Meter ins Wohngebiet rein war ein Versehen, oder?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
ElliottPlack (2017-01-03 03:40:41+00:00): Hey Choess, thanks for the help in this section the coastline is crazy complex. I just had a conflict with your edits, we were working on the same bridge (MD 335) at the same time, pretty coincidental!
ElliottPlack (2017-01-03 03:41:26+00:00): I imported a lot of the park and reserve lands through this area but it needs a ton of work, there is so much water.
ElliottPlack (2017-01-03 03:43:04+00:00): If you look up and down the bay, I've been working on a project with others to removed these tidal rivers from the coastline, I think that we can simplify things by taking away the coastline and turning the rivers into multipolygons, which are easier to edit the edges of.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Jørn-osm (2017-01-02 19:32:52+00:00): Hvor er det den officiel stavemåde kan ses?

På danmarks adresser ses det forkortet navn "A P Møller Koll".
http://danmarksadresser.dk/danmarks-adresser/0/42?x=10.5886184054926&y=55.055620483558&zoom=12

For mig ligner det mere en fejl kommunen burde rette.
MicDK (2017-01-03 11:39:17+00:00): Tak for kommentaren

Den officielle stavemåde (uden punktummer) fremgår af ois.dk og BBR-meddelelser. 

Det er korrekt, at her står der også "A P Møller Koll". Jeg har på Google Maps fundet vejskilte med "Kollegiet" udskrevet, og kollegiets administration angiver sin vejadresse som "Kollegiet". 

Samtidig er "Koll" er ikke et ord, og derfor har jeg taget mig friheden at udskrive det som "Kollegiet". Det vil heller ikke give problemer ved søgning på vejnavnet, da endelsen "egiet" jo ligger sidst i vejnavnet.

Summa summarum kan der argumenteres for kun at skrive "Koll", men jeg har vurderet , at det vil give flere informationer til brugerne at skrive "Kollegiet".
Hjart (2017-01-03 12:24:58+00:00): Med hensyn til stavemåder mm kan det være godt at være opmærksom på http://danmarksadresser.dk/file/383079/ds-vejledning-retskrivning.pdf
Hjart (2017-01-03 12:29:51+00:00): Bemærjk desuden at Google ikke tillader bl.a. "konkurrenter" (herunder OSM) at anvende deres produkter (i dette tilfælde Maps & Streetview). Derfor bør vi som OSM bidragsydere afholde os fra dette.
AsgerFrank (2017-01-03 13:46:02+00:00): Ja så det er godt Mapillary sommetider kan substituere for et gadekig, men er desværre ikke her.
Hjart (2017-01-03 14:38:36+00:00): I tilfældet med Mapillary er det godt at man ved manglende "gadekig" selv kan lave nogle ;-)
Jørn-osm (2017-01-03 19:23:21+00:00): Vi er enige om at der bør stå kollegiet uden forkortelse.
Så der er altså en fejl.

Denne fejl er tidligere blevet rettet via oisfixes.
http://oisfixes.iola.dk/rettelser/178/

Det er punktum eller ej der er spørgsmålet?
Og hvad med mellemrum?

På http://apmoellerkollegiet.dk/ cirka midt på siden
ses forskellige stavemåder 

under "firmainformation" er der mellemrum foran Møller
A.P. Møller Kollegiet 

under "adresseinformation" mangler mellemrum foran Møller
A.P.Møller Kollegiet

Begge stavemåder har dog punktum med.
Jørn-osm (2017-01-03 19:23:48+00:00): Når et vejnavn rettes uden at adressenoder rettes giver det fejl:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=10.58950&lat=55.05388&zoom=17&overlays=street_not_found
Jørn-osm (2017-01-03 19:24:21+00:00): Problemet med vejskilte er at de godt kan være forskellige på den samme vej.
Jeg mener vi bør følge det der er Danmarks Adresse Register(DAR) og som kan ses på danmarksadresser.dk
Er der noget der ikke stemmer bør kommunen have besked, så det kan blive rettet.

Er der undtagelser bør de stå på wikien, f.eks. N. Markvej rettes til Nordre Markvej.

På wikien står at "Forkortelser er altid med punktum."
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Vejnavne#Eksempler

Som jeg læser vejledning omtalt tidligere, passer wiki og vejledningen sammen.
_Mathieu_ (2017-01-24 13:06:12+00:00): Bonjour :)

Attention, le quartier est bien en zone de rencontre limitée à 20 km/h, comme en atteste depuis plusieurs mois la signalisation sur place.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
angys (2018-10-10 08:48:46+00:00): I think Jalan Sejahtera is wrong name, maybe Jalan Keladi? There are no suh Sejahtera area appear near Keladi ad maybe mistaken from Alma one..
AkuAnakTimur (2018-10-14 12:26:33+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=5.38345630105871&lng=100.55540574196343&z=17&pKey=iRpXOb-ui7LN1fR3sqTDWw&x=0.8546608805913689&y=0.5919100997120162&zoom=2.1251710429937924
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
surveyor54 (2017-01-02 21:28:30+00:00): Hallo Firevulture,

willkommen bei OSM.
Bitte Öffnungszeiten nach folgendem Schema mappen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Telephonnummern bitte nach diesem Schema mappen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Und dieses kann man auch gut gebrauchen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Z

Bei Fragen gibt es ein tolles Forum mit netten Kollegen, die gerne helfen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Gruß
surveyor54
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
MatteoBolo (2018-01-09 11:12:59+00:00): Hi, i think landuse=forest is incorrect for olive groves: you should use landuse=orhard + tree=olive_trees.
I will fix soon.
Bye-Bye
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
DD1GJ (2017-01-02 17:21:22+00:00): Hallo free2003, das Geoportal darf derzeit leider für OSM nicht genutzt werden. Dieser Änderungssatz wird daher zeitnah zurückgesetzt.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=578120#p578120
free2003 (2017-01-02 18:03:18+00:00): Hallo  DD1GJ, danke für die Info.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
ualios (2022-12-11 17:36:09+00:00): Ciao geotracer, hai modo di verificare se il blocco è ancora attivo?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-13 11:06:46+00:00): Should be reverted? #pleasereview
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-13 11:07:10+00:00): Should be reverted? #pleasereview
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-13 11:07:41+00:00): Should be reverted? #pleasereview
Sanniu (2017-01-03 08:49:49+00:00): משצק:יק=נחל יתיר
zstadler (2017-01-03 09:02:55+00:00): Corrected. Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-13 11:09:51+00:00): Duplicate residential area? Should be reverted. #pleasereview
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-13 11:06:19+00:00): Should be reverted? #pleasereview
poornibadrinath (2017-01-03 05:17:15+00:00): Hi Mapiando,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted a stream added by another mapper and added another stream which is incomplete, next to it. May I please know the reason of this change? Your changeset comment doesn't explain why you did this and it is not advisable to delete other mappers work without a solid reason. Please explain why you deleted or revert the changes you have done. 
Happy Mapping!

Best,
Poornima Badrinath
eggie (2018-01-05 15:58:40+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Rom1 (2017-01-02 21:04:06+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé tous les groupes de modifications car les données introduites n'ont pas été intégrées à celles déjà existantes... Désolé de commencer comme cela. J'espère ne pas vous avoir découragé pour la suite.
letihu (2017-01-07 20:17:46+00:00): Hier ist immer noch die alte und defekte wheelmap eingesetzt worden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585762892/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4592749692/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585723590/history
müssen an die richtige Stelle gesetzt werden.
baspng (2017-08-08 12:24:11+00:00): Antony Franco,
Validação acusa erro de sintaxe na Unidade Lucy Montoro, na chave "opening hours". O valor  "Mo-Fr 07:00-19:00" deve funcionar. Obrigado. baspng
user_5359 (2020-12-05 05:21:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/463299407: You forgot to add any OSM understandable key to this way.
oba510 (2017-01-03 02:34:55+00:00): HI, did you intend to delete the building here?
Kenji Yamada (2017-01-03 03:41:34+00:00): Oops, no. I was trying to switch from editing the building to adding a point.
oba510 (2017-01-04 11:33:02+00:00): Thanks. I've un-deleted the building.
user_1760129 (2018-09-23 23:41:03+00:00): Eine Verbesserung ist dieser Text ganz sicher nicht, allenfalls eine Ergänzung. Die Rechtschreibung ist leider ebenso mangelhaft wie der Inhalt.
Klumbumbus (2017-02-12 20:08:18+00:00): Hallo,
solange das "Standard-Luftbild" (bing) noch Gebäude zeigt, welche bereits abgerissen sind, ist es sinnvoll, die Umrisslinien nicht zu löschen, sondern zu behalten und mit einem note zu versehen, damit nächste Woche nicht jemand das Gebäude wieder vom Luftbild abmalt, weil er denkt, dass es in OSM noch fehlt. (Die tags, wie bspw. building=yes müssen natürlich trotzdem entfernt werden.)
VG
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-02 20:48:46+00:00): reviewed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44833906
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-02 20:49:19+00:00): Thanks for the correction, Thomas Freethy!
maxerickson (2018-02-13 17:01:37+00:00): The changeset comment says "building footprints" but really this changeset contains hundreds or thousands of disconnected nodes. Sometimes ways get uploaded separately from nodes; that isn't what happened here, I'm seeing hundreds of unused nodes that duplicate building nodes.

Please investigate and clean them up.

Thanks,

Max
datendelphin (2017-01-07 12:59:01+00:00): Hallo
Dieses Gebäude ist schon lange weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463321083 Die Luftbilder sind alt.
Grüsse
Michael
BCNorwich (2017-01-03 07:34:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
These two additions look like fiction, a nightclub in a grassed park, a highway rest area in the middle of a street. You either had a very good night or a very bad one.
I have removed the features, however if you can show me wrong I'll gladly apologise and put the back.
Regards
PT-53 (2017-01-03 12:12:03+00:00): Hallo MrWebber,
ich halte Deine Änderungen in diesem Bereich für übereilt / unnötig. Im Rahmen des Baus der Ortsumfahrung Unlingen werden manche Feldwege verlegt bzw. zurückgebaut, andere neue Feldwege kommen hinzu. Bevor man hier Änderungen vornimmt, sollte man die Situation vor Ort besichtigen. Ich wollte das in der nächsten Radsaison tun. Hast Du aktuelle Ortskenntnisse ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-01-03 08:49:45+00:00): Bitte bei jedem Änderungssatz einen aussagefähigen Kommentar und die Quelle für die Daten angeben.
Danke.
stephankn (2017-02-18 08:17:13+00:00): why the re-classification of ways? EG 29421587 does not justify to be reclassified from residential to unclassified. Already the geometry is a clear indication that this is wrong.
136154 (2017-02-28 10:03:23+00:00): You are are right! I changed it back to residential - can't see the logic either why I did it but I cannot remember why I did it…
ediyes (2017-01-03 13:24:06+00:00): No es un error de edición, fue un error de las capas de JOSM. :(
highflyer74 (2017-01-03 08:40:17+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall wurden (vermutlich unabsichtlich) zwei leere Nodes erstellt. Ich habe sie wieder entfernt.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
mirror176 (2019-01-21 07:35:26+00:00): Parking area (way 121870030) was changed to be oneway=no which I found as a JOSM validator warning. Was that tag intended for an adjacent way and if not, what is its meaning when on a parking area?
Dr Kludge (2019-02-19 13:46:19+00:00): Thanks for catching the issue.  I must have clipped the parking area when I was editing the parking lanes.  A change set will fix that shortly.
nyuriks (2017-01-02 22:16:33+00:00): oops, uploaded all instead of just poland ( which is the majority of these) :(  Sorry about that.
user_2842609 (2017-01-02 22:46:37+00:00): :) Thanks !
marczoutendijk (2017-01-05 15:44:47+00:00): proszę zatrzymać edycji i skontaktować się z forum. Powodem jest to, że wiele tagów z innych mappers zmianie bez konsultacji z nimi. Autostrada = ścieżek rowerowych jest zły tag dla tras MTB. To musi być zrobione z relacjami.

Please read:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=625132#p625132
mueschel (2017-01-04 13:06:14+00:00): Hi,
please stop importing data until you have fixed the spelling mistake!
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44859230

Btw, is the license of this data source compatible with OSM?

Jan
Commodoortje (2017-02-05 09:07:38+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuilding tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Mirasolera (2018-03-25 15:01:43+00:00): Hola, que se puede hacer en esta cabana? Comer, beber algo? O que es esto exacto?
user_3216889 (2017-02-05 17:15:51+00:00): Café St.Petersburgweg bij Odenseweg bestaat niet meer, heb het verwijderd.
Luchtfoto's vaak verouderd!
Hjart (2017-01-03 11:26:56+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at ændre dette. Relevante tags er nu på arealet: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463402465
mds878 (2017-01-08 01:58:26+00:00): The edit of connection road broke the relation of the bus route. If you need to join the road, please use JOSM instead of iD editor.
Jeffrey Friedl (2017-01-08 02:18:27+00:00): Oh, sorry!  I don't know how to use JOSM... I tried, and it seemed much less convenient. I couldn't figure it out.

Normally iD tells me about relations, so maybe I got confused this time. Or, does iD not tell about bus-route relations?
mds878 (2017-01-08 03:21:24+00:00): When combining the way in the bus route and the way not included in the bus route, JOSM displays a warning, but iD will not display a warning. So doing this kind of operation with iD, the risk of unintentionally breaking the data is high.
Although using JOSM may be difficult at first time, most of the mappers I know edit with JOSM.
I think that there is an option not to do a join operation of way. I believe that joining operations are less necessary.
Jeffrey Friedl (2017-01-08 03:26:32+00:00): Thanks for explaining. I would like to investigate so I can understand more... can you tell me the latitude/longitude of the point where the mistake is (bus route and not bus route got joined). I will see how it looks in JOSM and iD and try to learn how to map better. Thanks!
mds878 (2017-01-08 03:37:25+00:00): I already repaired it. (But it will take several days for the transport map to be updated)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44992265#map=17/34.73723/135.53640&layers=T

Only the eastern way is included in the bus route. The western way is not included.