piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-01-04 13:43:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping.
You solved a lot of issues, shown on the Issue triangle. These are caused by the use of a wrong imagery by you . The offset made these errors. 
You used the Bing imagery rather than the contract imagery.

 You have correctly identified the location of most buildings. (but on the wrong place)
Most of the buildings here are rectangular, so you can make use of the Q-key to make their corners 90° angles
Please read this document as well
Best regards

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
GartenStuhl (2020-11-19 13:34:32+00:00): Unter anderem fährt da ja auch der Bus durch, ich weiss nicht ob highway:service wirklich das richtige ist.
muchichka_s (2020-11-19 14:16:30+00:00): До речі в редакторі ID є можливість випрямляти кути будівлям. Наводите на будівлю і натискаєте Q або праву кнопку мишки і вибрати в меню квадратик. Реально економить багато часу, зір і виглядає красивіше
DD1GJ (2020-11-19 11:48:27+00:00): 1. Hier befindet sich eine Autowerkstatt, bei der Sie nach vorheriger Vereinbarung ein Auto begutachten, so wie auch jeder andere Gutachter, wenn er vom KFZ-Besitzer oder einer Versicherung beauftragt wird. Ebenso würden Sie, falls beauftragt, auch ein Auto in einer Werkstatt in Puttgarden oder Burg begutachten.

2. OSM ist kein Branchenbuch oder Business Portal. Wir unterstützen gerne die lokale Betriebe vor Ort bzw. bei Selbständigen EINEN festen Bürostandort, so wie im Impressum angegeben. Der wäre bei Ihnen in Bünde.
Es werden z.B. Bäckerfilialen als eigenständiger Verkaufsstandort aufgenommen. Ein mobiler Verkaufsstand, der jeden Mittwoch auf dem Burger Wochenmarkt steht, jedoch nicht. Da gibt es nur einen Eintrag für den gesamten Wochenmarkt.

3. SEO-Methoden wie zahlreiche Einträge als Werbung zur Vortäuschung einer ständigen lokalen Präsenz sind im Projekt unerwünscht. Gäbe es da nicht diese strengen Regularien, so wäre das Projekt in kürzester Zeit eine unbenutzbare Datenmüllhalde.

4. Davon abgesehen sind alle Ihre Einträge technisch teilweise fehlerhaft und werden durch zahlreiche Qualitätssicherungstools zur weiteren Prüfung angezeigt. Wenn das aufgrund der Masse der Einträge von anderen Mitwirkenden als Werbemüll eingestuft wird, löschen diese ebenfalls die Einträge. So verschwand auch der vorherige Eintrag ohne mein Zutun.

5. Bei OSM sind alle gleich. Wenn z.B. Dekra oder TÜV alle Werkstattstandorte, an denen Prüfungen durchgeführt werden, als KFZ-Prüfstelle eintragen würden, dann würden die ebenfalls gelöscht und die Firmen um Unterlassung gebeten werden. Von diesen Organisationen werden auch nur die Prüfstellen akzeptiert, die baulich überwiegend diesem Zweck dienen.

6. Wenn Sie auf ihren zahlreichen Webseiten eine Karte mit allen Ihren "Tätigkeitsstandorten" veröffentlichen möchten, dann verwenden Sie bitte https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/
L'imaginaire (2021-02-27 17:35:26+00:00): Is deze verkaveling al in aanbouw? Op luchtfoto's of GRB nog niets te zien. Indien gepland, dan best "proposed" gebruiken (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed), indien in aanbouw, dan best "construction" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction)
Patchanka (2020-11-22 13:55:43+00:00): Bonjour
je vois que vous avez supprimé plusieurs voies... Est-ce que vraiment elles n'existent plus ? Si c'est juste que ce sont des voies privées, alors ajouter le tag access=private me semblerait plus opportun que de les supprimer.
Par ailleurs, pourriez-vous détailler un peu plus vos commentaires de modifications car indiquer "Modif" à chaque fois n'amène pas tellement d'information sur les modifications effectuées. (conseils ici --> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications).
Merci et bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94426464
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:29:05+00:00): Deleted attraction at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543
czubi (2020-12-27 20:52:10+00:00): Kein Eigenname
czubi (2020-12-28 12:28:48+00:00): korregiert
Shaun das Schaf (2020-11-25 19:45:19+00:00): Hallo Ralph,

handelt es sich bei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30805109
wirklich um eine Spielstraße?
Die Höchstgeschwindigkeit ist nämlich im Moment noch auf 30 km/h gesetzt, was doch eher unüblich wäre.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Ralph Schindel (2020-11-26 08:13:32+00:00): Hallo Shaun
ja, ich habe vergessen, die Höchstgeschwindigkeit zu ändern. Ist nun erledigt.
Viele Grüsse
Ralph
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-19 12:37:50+00:00): Hey there,

Try to draw the whole building, even if it's partially covered by vegetation or if the imagery is slightly unclear/not of a high enough resolution. If you're unsure if a building is 1 or more buildings, draw it as 1 building.
Also, feel free to check your contributions with other imagery layers. You can find them in the "Imagery" menu at the top of JOSM. See also:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Menu/Imagery

I'll leave the buildings you mapped as-is. I'm personally more focused on landuse and error fixing.
Sawan Shariar (2020-12-12 19:28:30+00:00): Thank you so much for your instructions. It will help
danieldegroot2 (2020-12-12 19:50:11+00:00): No problem. Have fun mapping and merry christmas in advance!
Sawan Shariar (2020-12-12 20:02:22+00:00): Merry Christmas in advance to you too :)
eggie (2020-11-19 10:33:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 10:59:09+00:00): Aanvraag BAG update bedrijventerrein gedaan via forum OSM
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=808834#p808834
gr eggie
Kovoschiz (2020-12-08 05:31:42+00:00): 1. Can you explain why should `motor_vehicle=no` + `bus=yes` still get `=secondary` instead of `=service`? 
2. Please don't mis-appropriate objects https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7159365191
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94428780
小智智 (2020-12-08 09:16:45+00:00): The fact that motor vehicle is not allowed has no relationship to the fact that the road is a major road inside the road network. No one in the right mind will think that Des Voeux Road Central in the city centre is a "service road".
Kovoschiz (2020-12-08 18:35:31+00:00): No one in the right mind would consider a road for certain non-public vehicles only as a `=secondary`. This is even franchised bus only. A bus-only road or busway, and busy pedestrian roads can be `=service`, and `=pedestrian` or `=living_street` respectively. `=service` here means a certain function, not that it's non-public, non-important, or in a facility.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-08 18:40:28+00:00): No one in their right mind would classify this to be the same as Queen's Rd C, et al either.
小智智 (2020-12-09 13:57:36+00:00): This road is so important because it is a major road traversing the city centre to the extent that only franchised buses are allowed to ensure smooth operation. When people sketches a road diagram of Central this is one of the first roads to mind. highway=service is totally inappropriate for use on such major roads. They are used for driveways, access slips, etc. which does not form part of the road network.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-09 14:06:35+00:00): This is totally irrelevant. A bus-only road is considered `=service`, whereever it is. You have failed to distinguish the section of DVRC for right turn from Ice House St as well. If a `=pedestrian` or  `=living_street`, etc, is important, we don't change it to something higher-rank either. For pedestrian or other importance, some other form of tagging should be used. This concerns general vehicles only.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-09 14:07:45+00:00): What's more, there's the tramway, and eastbound lanes of DVRC west of Pedder St. Its significance can already be reflected.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-09 14:08:41+00:00): Even if you for some reason want this, how does this get the same `=secondary` as DVRC E-b, QRC, and others?
小智智 (2020-12-09 14:09:23+00:00): This is from the wiki description of highway=service:

Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc. This is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys.

This is totally irrelevant for Des Voeux Road Central. And it is not used only because of certain class of vehicles are prohibited.
小智智 (2020-12-09 14:12:01+00:00): highway=secondary

A highway which is not part of a major route, but nevertheless forming a link in the national route network. In developed countries it normally has 2 lanes and the traffic for both directions is usually separated by a central line on the road. In areas with worse infrastructure road quality may be far worse.

Des Voeux Road Central (both bounds) matches this description perfectly. It is not part of the trunk road network but it is an important link throughout the Central area. However in westbound this link is open for franchised buses only, and it is an very important link for buses going from Wan Chai to Sheung Wan.
maraf24 (2020-12-09 15:37:24+00:00): @ 小智智: A national bicycle route would also match the description perfectly. 
I think you are wrongly taking general and concise wiki description as a strict definition.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 04:45:14+00:00): "However in westbound this link is open for franchised buses only, and it is an very important link for buses going from Wan Chai to Sheung Wan." Please use other tags to indicate the importance of a road to other modes.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 04:58:53+00:00): As a comparison, on King's Rd: 
`=secondary` is used for `motor_vehicle=yes`;
`=tertiary` for long sections of `motor_vehicle=destination`; 
`=unclassified` or `=residential` (I tend to the latter) for a single segment of `motor_vehicle=destination`.
It's unconvincing to consider that the Queensway -- Jubilee St westbound lanes is as important the eastbound lanes up to Charter Rd. Similarly, the North-Sound streets in the area except Pedder St, as well as Lamberth Walk have been classified as `=tertiary`. 
To highlight the usage of DVRC W-b for Bank St, and right turn into E-b from Ice House St on `PH`, `=unclassified` have been applied to them. 
A `=service` could as high quality as "public" roads in an airport.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:00:49+00:00): There's no distinction of national (often `=trunk`) or lower administrative management and classification here. They should be classified by function.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:01:58+00:00): Context link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95582941 on "busway".
小智智 (2020-12-10 05:07:17+00:00): I'm going to change it to tertiary as on King's Road - it's definitely not a service
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:08:15+00:00): Further considering the road hierarchy in the "old" part of city: 
A extreme example is Garden Rd / Cotton Tree Dr. They are important to the district only, not regionally. After thinking about up-ranking them to `=primary` before,  I agree that with the long-standing status that `=secondary` is suitable. 
DVRC E'b west of Jubilee St obviously service a distributor role in the district. 
Morrison St and Rumsey St north of DVRC is its continuation to DVRW via Connuaght Rd W. 
Cleverly St serves left-turn from Connaught Rd C into inner Sheung Wan.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:09:08+00:00): "as on King's Road" is `motor_vehicle=destination`.
Richard (2020-12-11 15:06:32+00:00): Oxford High Street is a similar situation - an important road where cars are forbidden but buses are allowed. It has been consistently mapped as highway=tertiary since 2007. Sorry Kovoschiz, but your assertions really aren't in keeping with OSM precedence.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2988061
Richard (2020-12-11 15:07:03+00:00): (Oxford was, of course, one of the first cities to be mapped in detail in OSM.)
小智智 (2020-12-12 11:11:19+00:00): apart from this he has caused a lot of mess in other areas as well, most notably tagging slip roads outside the legal limit as motorway_link (which the consensus is that motorway = legal expressway and tunnels delimited by signs)
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 13:30:02+00:00): @小智智 
This is totally incorrect however. `=motorway_link` is decided by the final decision point on diverges. This has been agreed on by several editors in past debates, and secondarily iirc local Apple workers. OSM doesn't attempt differentiate between Motorway area precisely. This is a local addition to use `motorway=no`. HK has the issue of long non-Expressway and non-Tunnel Area roads leading to Expressway and Tunnel Area, for administrative reasons. If you have followed past debates, you will know what's the situation. 
I'm highly offended by you reverting my temporary restores, even if they may be wrong in the end, when we are discussing, including your language of "no person in their right mind". You then accuse me of starting an edit war. Isn't this a bit hypocritical?
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 13:31:35+00:00): @Richard Would you consider the A420 designation as a necessary factor for `=tertiary`? There's no such network designation here, and they are classified functionally.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 13:34:06+00:00): @Richard I also see `designation=primary`  + `hgv=designated`, when the case here is `motor_vehicle=no` + `bus=private`.
小智智 (2020-12-12 13:34:36+00:00): I'm also offended by you adding a lot of tags which are either wrong (such as owner=* on bus routes), both undocumented and meaningless (such as carriageway=*), or not following the universal wiki documentation (like the motorway_link limit).
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 13:43:02+00:00): @Richard 
Purely looking at legal restriction (which of course you may point out is an incomplete view), George St and Magdalen St are `=residential`. Is there any comparison that can be made here? 
To note, to general traffic, Des Voeux Rd Central eastbound lanes west of Pedder St is already  `=secondary`
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 13:47:58+00:00): @小智智 
1. Is `owner=` on all train routes to represent the train owners wrong? How do you represent MTRCL using KCRC trains? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/owner#combinations at least has 1k `route=` usage. Is this wrong? 
2. There are 2.5k `carriageway=dual`. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:dual_carriageway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:dual_carriageway%3Dyes. I have been studying what would a good solution to document. Do you have any inputs? 
3. Please tell us where do you find the Wiki suggesting to change `_link` classification mid-way. This is frowned upon worldwide.
小智智 (2020-12-12 13:54:48+00:00): 1. owner= in combination of route=railway is good (the railway is owned by KCR), but not on the service themselves (route=train or route=subway). The fact that MTR uses KCR trains on certain train services does not mean KCR owns the train service.
2. Maybe use dual_carriageway=yes or no.
3. The wiki page also says that highway=motorway_link means motorway restriction. In general the _link won't change mid-way however for motorways it's legally different before and after the sign. (For example, stopping restrictions aren't valid before the sign)
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 14:09:25+00:00): 1. So how do you suggest this to be represented, which you should have done as a change, instead of only removing it? It puzzles me you consider `operator=` to be operating trains, yet `owner=` can't be used for owning the trains. 
2. This fails to represent triple and single carriageway. "Dual carriageway" may also be interepreted as a legal restriction  unwittingly. That's why I ask to discuss these beforehand. I don't see you mentioning this in Discord or wiki. 
3. "In general the _link won't change mid-way however for motorways it's legally different" do you know the point of last decision is used here?
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 15:15:51+00:00): Concurrent: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95718255 
Example related changeset discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86417366
Before I forget. I must also point out you have non-descriptive changeset comments on the changes in changesets related to this.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-12 15:18:24+00:00): As another example, you haven't responded on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93761856. 
This is formed from for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86356680
sovereign_ch (2020-11-26 18:02:08+00:00): Zurückgesetzt. Neben dem falschem Strassentyp, wurde das saubere SOGIS-Orthophoto ignoriert.
FranTi (2020-11-27 07:24:01+00:00): Vielen Dank Sovereign_ch. Auch das habe ich jetzt gelernt.
Xevi (2020-11-19 16:01:19+00:00): Moltes gracies Xavier, si saps altres edificis del mateix arquitecte o d'altres arquitectes si us plau afegeix-la que es molt valuosa.
ibanez (2020-11-19 18:21:40+00:00): Welcome to Openstreetmap, you should correct the overlapping building lines where you mapped in Hayn. 
If possible make building parts rectangular by marking and using the 'Q' key in iD Editor.
Thanks for mapping
Mr_Luke065 (2020-11-20 07:08:23+00:00): Hi,
I removed the overlapping and corrected to rectangular shape, for the builduings that are rectengular, espicially the building with teh whiite roof is not rectangular...
Thanks Jens :-)
eggie (2020-11-19 10:38:26+00:00): Dag Ruben.. je editgebied veel kleiner houden svp.
Commentaar local update zegt niemand iets.
Graag iets concreter.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 10:44:16+00:00): Waneer je een highway=unclassified omzet naar een track zou dat goed kunnen.
Bij track hoort de regel
tracktype=grade?
grade1 is asfalt beton
grade2=gravel (half verhard) 
unpaved is tracktype=grade3 of 4

zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
MVG,
eggie
DP24PH (2020-11-19 13:26:22+00:00): Don't worry, #OSMPH #papercut_fix 79 has been issued. More details to follow.


DP24
eggie (2020-11-19 11:46:25+00:00): Oke, maar dit klopt niet. Je zegt surface = unpaved, maar dat kan nooit tracktype=grade1 zijn.
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94431864
eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 12:40:49+00:00): Aangepast naar tracktype= grade 2 surface=gravel.
Klopt dit nog?
Je eigen tagging spreekt zichzelf tegen. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 11:48:35+00:00): Dit zou correct moeten zijn met grade3
Je tagt motor_vehicle=destination. Dan kun je het beste moped=  en mofa=yes toevoegen.
Die worden in OSM als motorvoertuigen beschouwd.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 11:51:37+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... unpaved kan geen tracktype=grade1 zijn.
grade2 is bv gravel  grade3 is zand soms met puin. 
grade1 is asphalt of concrete
permissive wil zeggen dat de eigenaar van de grond je ten alle tijden je de toegang kan ontzeggen. Er staat al destination. 
Kijk nog even.
eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 12:51:30+00:00): Ik heb tracktype grade1 voorlopig verwijderd omdat dit niet kan icm unpaved. Kijk nog even welke tracktype bij unpaved hoort.
eggie
DaveF (2022-07-24 14:57:34+00:00): Hi
Please use the prow_ref tag, not name.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-20 11:13:27+00:00): Ciao. Non aggiungere i numeri civici agli edifici. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Posiziona quindi un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso ove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente con i tag addr:*. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94433545
eggie (2020-11-19 12:20:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
JeroenHoek (2020-11-20 08:04:01+00:00): Tip: vermeld ook even je bron bij het 'source'-veld van de wijziging. Dat kan bijvoorbeeld 'survey' zijn als je zelf ter plekke gezien hebt dat dit zo is, maar een linkje naar het ontwerpstratenplan of projectpagina kan ook, net als een linkje naar de krant/raadsvergadering/bekendmaking waaruit je dit te weten bent gekomen.
E de Wit (2020-11-20 11:45:29+00:00): Momenteel wordt de Sudertrimdielsdyk gebruikt als ontsluiting voor bouwverkeer om de Hoyteslân te ontzien (gezien dit de primaire wijkontsluiting is).

In de definitieve situatie is er volgens een artist impression inderdaad geen verbinding met de Sudertrimdielsdyk.
https://www.noorderbreedte.eu/nieuw-mellens/files/2020/10/artimpression-zuidlanden-maquette.png_555x197_acf_cropped.jpg

-E de Wit
ivanbranco (2020-12-01 20:39:38+00:00): Ciao ceccherellone,

non so a che pro ma stai inserendo le tua email personale come nome degli elementi, ho cancellato.
cecchellone (2020-12-02 02:18:45+00:00): O mio dio scusatemi, mi ero già accorto di questo problema, ma purtroppo è una estensione del browser per l'auto compilazione dei campi, e quando trova scritto "nome" mette la mia mail... Dal momento che non riesco a escluderlo per il sito, da quando ho notato questo problema ho prontamente provveduto a disabilitare questa estensione alla modifica, ma evidentemente qualche volta ha fatto danno prima che me ne accorgessi... Chiedo scusa e grazie per averla rimossa!
ivanbranco (2020-12-02 08:54:47+00:00): No problem, se era capitato altre volte era comunque l'ultimo rimasto, buon mappaggio! :)
limes11 (2021-04-09 19:07:06+00:00): Hi,

ist hier wirklich access=no auf dem Weg? Siehe Hinweis 2614964. 

VG, Limes
ToniE (2020-11-19 12:11:18+00:00): Sorry, aber ich glaube nicht, dass der Kunstturm das gesamte Gelände umfassen wird mit seinen 16 Stockwerken.
Wenn ich mir den nördlichen Teil des Geländes anschaue, wird dort wohl der Turm entstehen, oder?

Und: wir mappen nur real existierende Dinge. Verschattung von zukünftigen Gebäuden bitte anders simulieren, nicht bei OSM.

Ich werde den Kunstturm wieder löschen.

Gruß
Toni
eggie (2020-11-19 12:22:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 12:32:26+00:00): Volgens de BGT heet dit stuk weer wel Merel. Je zou op 'verbeter de kaart' een bericht kunnen achterlaten dat het kadaster dit eens goed uitzoekt.

https://verbeterdekaart.kadaster.nl/#?geometry.x=148240.91&geometry.y=380835.24&zoomlevel=14.46

Anders blijft het dweilen met de kraan open. 
Wat staat op het straatnaambord? 
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-11-20 06:59:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/874665888/history. I reduced the number on unlogical keys to highway=residential (DON'T use Residential, this will not show on the map)
MIGORMCZ (2020-12-02 12:46:29+00:00): Zdravím, trať byla označena jako railway:preserved=yes (což značí příležitostní muzejní provoz, na dráze jinak určené k jinému provozu). Není to totiž čistě muzejní dráha, je to dráha určená převážně k turistickému provozu. Vaším přetagováním z railway=rail na railway=preserved se trať navíc přestala vykreslovat v jiných mapách jako Openrailwaymap.
koldas (2020-12-02 14:42:57+00:00): Dobrý den,
takových tratí je u nás více (třeba 125 – Krupá – Kolešovice; podotýkám, že u této trati nejsem autorem změn), kde to také není čistě muzejní dráha. Pravidelný provoz zde ale již zanikl (osobní i nákladní), stejně jako zde. Šlo mi o to sjednotit značení těchto tratí u nás.
To, že Openrailwaymap neumí zpracovat tag railway=preserved mě mrzí, ale to je třeba urgovat u nich.
MIGORMCZ (2020-12-02 17:02:51+00:00): To, že pravidelný provoz zanikne neznamená, že by se měla trať označit jako railway=preserved, což je muzejní dráha. Pokud vím, tak české zákony něco jako muzejní dráhu neznají. Proto jsem tam dal ten tag railway:preserved=yes (podle dokumentace se má používat, pokud by nastala kolize s railway=rail, apod.), který by podle mě měl být na všech podobných drahách v ČR spolu s railway=rail. A jen tak mimochodem, na této trati pracuji brigádně jako údržbář a nemá to rozhodně být muzejní dráha. Má se tam v sezóně provozovat doprava pro turistický ruch, muzejní provoz bude až jako vedlejší činnost.