piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-24 20:01:34+00:00): Žemėlapio info nėra ortofoto nuotraukos tiesioginis vektorizavimas. T.y. nereikia ortofoto tiesiogiai „krauti“ į OSM. Ortofoto duoda mintį/idėją, kokia galėtų būti žemėlapyje norimos perduoti minties geometrija, bet žemėlapiui reikia topologinės (nuo šalia esančių objektų priklausomos) informacijos.
Iš Vilniaus duomenų kuriami spausdinami žemėlapiai, jų sukurti Kaune nepavyksta, dėl to, kad ten suvesta kartografijai netinkama ortofoto vektorizacija visiškai nesilaikant topolgogijos taisyklių.
PovilasDew (2019-02-25 18:11:20+00:00): Kur galėčiau rasti topologijos taisykles? Neišmanau situacijos, bet atrodo keistai, kad tokie dalykai skatina ribojimus tvarkant duomenis. Tokiu atveju, galėčiau užsiimti Kauno sutvarkymu kaip teisingai reikia (kiek įmanoma).
Tiesą sakant, aš pats vis neatrandu sau tinkamiausio standarto kaip galėčiau žymėti vektorius. Iš pradžių landuse žymėdavau ant kelių, nes norėdavau, kad žemėlapis būtų pilnai užtušuotas, bet paskui tada sulipusius poligonus labai sunku tvarkyti (arba tingiu gilintis kaip tvarkyti). Beje lengviau pažymėti naują vektorių, nei taikyti ant seno vektoriaus.
PovilasDew (2019-02-25 18:19:09+00:00): Radau osm bloge. https://blog.openmap.lt/2017/10/30/topologijos-taisykles/
Bet čia apibrėžia tik multipoligonus. Nieko nerašo apie poligonų ploto ar atstumų tarp vektorių ribojimus. Sutinku, kad neturi būti viduje poligonas poligone be skylių. Stengsiuosi šių situacijų vengti ir situaciją tvarkyti, bet kodėl yra blogai pvz. keliolikos cm2 ploto žolė tarp takų, kur vektorių atstumas vienas nuo kito yra pvz. keliolika cm? Iš pažiūros, atrodo, niekam netrukdo, netgi informacija atrodo tikslesnė.
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:29:26+00:00): Maybe you could try having a discussion about this at the forum, you know, instead of reverting the hard work I did...
Martin868 (2019-02-22 21:36:24+00:00): The wikis are crystal clear on this, so is the good practice. You can have fun on the forums, but I won't spend anytime on this. Please read and comprehend the wikis, that's the reference. I already sent you relevant links
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:51:17+00:00): St. Thomas, ON, Binghamton, NY, Penticton, BC, etc. are all tagged as cities, yet they are much smaller than Richelieu. You have to be consistent.
Martin868 (2019-02-22 21:53:58+00:00): These places should be town.
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:56:03+00:00): So change them then, or have a discussion about it on the mailing list or the forum if it's too hard for you to do. There should be someone able to do it.
Geography Canada (2019-02-28 02:48:57+00:00): (... Desperately awaiting a response...)...
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:07:42+00:00): See the city's official website at http://www.villedemont-tremblant.qc.ca/en/. It says "© 2016 - 2019 City of Mont-Tremblant".
Martin868 (2019-02-22 21:11:52+00:00): Again, this is irrelevant. The tag value has nothing to do with the name of the place. It has do do with its size and function. Read the wikis.
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:16:30+00:00): Wikipedia calls it a city too.
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:21:50+00:00): Maybe you could try having a discussion about this at the forum, you know, instead of reverting all of the hard work I did...
Martin868 (2019-02-22 21:22:00+00:00): You really don't get it do you. The name is ERRELEVANT. The tag value changes rendering of the name and it is a reflection of the size and function of the town/city. Capitals should always be tagged city to stand out on maps. Other places it depends on their relative importance, not how they call themselves.  The tags could have been called "small_city" and "large_city" but somebody one day decided to call them "town" and "city" and it will have to remain such for ever. That's all.
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:26:34+00:00): You made a suggestion that Kitchener should be tagged as a town when it has always been tagged as a city (in all of the near 11 years of its existence on OSM): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/260034778/history.
Martin868 (2019-02-22 21:49:16+00:00): Regarding Kitchener, it was a bad exemple. I just looked at it and with a population over 200K the tag place=city is certainly justified. It is much larger than I thought. I am not for the area...
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:28:51+00:00): Maybe you could try having a discussion about this at the forum first, you know, instead of reverting all of the hard work I did...
Geography Canada (2019-02-22 21:45:00+00:00): You made a suggestion that Kitchener should be tagged as a town, when it has always been tagged as a city (in all of the near 11 years of its existence on OSM): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/260034778/history.
mtmail (2019-03-21 23:32:47+00:00): I don't quite understand the change from admin_level=3 to admin_level=2. A value of 2 represents a country border https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative Is this based on data that used similar named tag?
Warin61 (2019-02-24 03:07:01+00:00): Err .. relation for the railway=station 9348855 has 4 members .. no roles .. does not make sense. 

I have deleted it. The tag railway=station is now on what was the outer way - Way: 672396971. The building in the middle is possibly a roof? And therefore layer=1?
mueschel (2019-02-27 13:24:09+00:00): Hi,
you used some new tags here like "roof:highway = service". What does it mean?

If there is a highway on top of the building this should be 
highway=service
layer = 1
tesp (2019-02-27 21:44:13+00:00): Hi,

thanks for the feedback. The ways are on top of the shopping mall. I have now updated them and added layer=1 and location=rooftop.
DD1GJ (2019-02-23 07:35:15+00:00): Hallo liamshouse, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für Deine Mühe, aber ich musste Deine Änderungen leider komplett zurücksetzen. Du hattest den Verlauf des Richard Löwenherz Weges nochmals als Weg über unzählige andere Straßen und Wege gezeichnet, was völlig falsch war. Dabei wurden versehentlich auch zahlreiche andere Objekte "beschädigt".

Der Verlauf von Wanderwegen wird als Relation erfasst, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3286361

Allerdings ist dies etwas komplex und bedarf einer gewissen Erfahrung. Ebenso ist der von Dir verwendete Anfängereditor iD dafür nicht besonders geeignet. JOSM wäre besser. Weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Grüße, Joachim
Litawor (2019-02-24 15:33:24+00:00): Pastatų adresai užrašomi naudojant 3 pagrindines žymas: 
addr:city=
addr:street=
addr:housnumber=
ika-chan! (2019-05-28 16:12:15+00:00): Roundabouts and their connectors use normal road types, and not links.

JOSM’s claim that the roundabout should be secondary is incorrect, because it connects two roads of a higher classification.
JeroenHoek (2019-02-22 22:34:21+00:00): Dat is snel. Bedankt.
zors1843 (2019-02-23 07:18:43+00:00): Duplicate POI.  Removed.
Jakka (2019-02-23 11:56:01+00:00): attention vous mettez deux fois les adresse ils sont sur bâtiment et puis encore une fois sur node ??? pas bon.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.86361/4.41605
Glassman (2019-02-22 23:22:36+00:00): The roads should only be deleted if they don't exist. If they are private tag them as such. (access=private)

I agree those marked highway=residential are probably just logging roads and can either be tagged as highway=service + access=private or highway=track + access=private.

To add a gate, just add a node where the gate is located and tag it as barrier=gate. 

I can revert your changeset if you like so you can make the changes.

I'm also sending you a message with more information about OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67482966
Omnific (2019-02-22 23:37:26+00:00): Please don't delete roads that exist because they are private. I will be reverting both of your changeset. If you have questions, please reach out.
D Overton (2019-02-22 23:41:41+00:00): These are temporary logging roads, they are not permanent features
Glassman (2019-02-24 03:38:22+00:00): Omnific - I was thinking we should revert all of the edits. I'll be traveling tomorrow, but I could do them monday unless we get a better response from D Overton.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67483380
Omnific (2019-02-24 15:26:28+00:00): D Overton, until the logging roads no longer exist on the ground, they should still be mapped. They are very clearly visible from current imagery, so they should remain mapped. I understand that you might want to delete them so they don't show up as important as main roads, but you should tag them as private driveways (for people's personal driveways) or as private track roads (for logging roads) instead of outright deleting them. I have reverted these changesets, but also reclassified a lot of the roads you deleted to show you the proper tagging methodology.
Warin61 (2019-03-07 03:15:13+00:00): Way: Marsden Oval (655863367) Not a park. Part of the school .. recreation ground.. probably.

Tree area .. the 'name' is a description - use description= tag for this.
Glassman (2019-02-23 04:03:08+00:00): Why did you remove the path?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67483644
beulahd (2019-03-19 09:21:20+00:00): Hi Mith52,

Hope you are doing good. While working near Singapore i have observed that you have removed existing data. So, can you please let me know the reason why these existing segment are removed.

Thank you,
beulahd
Mith252 (2019-03-19 13:14:36+00:00): Hi beulahd,

These point were removed as the buildings there have been demolished.
beulahd (2019-03-20 09:01:49+00:00): Hi Mith52 ,
ok Thank you for the information
Dimacn (2019-02-23 13:56:42+00:00): Реальный парк?
shura0 (2019-02-26 08:58:08+00:00): Нет там никакого парка, по снимку там обычный двор
Morf45 (2019-02-26 09:03:50+00:00): Тут ни разу ни двор, соглашусь, и не парк ни разу. Тут полянка где растут кусты и трава.
Вообще мне нужно было это все для pokemon go, ибо в Софрино на этой стороне где я это место отметил "парком" есть только два покестопа (кто играл хотя бы раз, тот поймёт), вот и хотел сделать так чтобы добавили хотя бы ещё 1
shura0 (2019-02-26 09:26:37+00:00): Я так и подумал, что это для покемонов. Однако OSM создан не для них.

Удалил
Kinsio (2025-06-08 09:04:49+00:00): Just happened upon this changeset and some of your other ones adding amenity=prison_camp areas when I was looking at prison-related tagging recently. I'm a bit concerned with the sourcing (Epoch Times is considered a deprecated source by the English Wikipedia, for instance, as "most editors classify The Epoch Times as an advocacy group for the Falun Gong, and consider the publication a biased or opinionated source that frequently publishes conspiracy theories as fact" [1]), but there's clearly at least *something* at these outlined sites. I just feel like this tagging suggests an unwarranted level of certainty about what these places actually are.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:EPOCHTIMES
pangoSE (2025-06-15 09:09:48+00:00): Thanks for looking into this. Feel free to remove the tags and perhaps let's make a note that ask for confirmation on the ground?
gscscnd (2019-02-24 15:57:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670688371 to nie mur tylko tunel w budowie. Poprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67520600.
chachafish (2019-03-18 13:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions. Just so you know, the minimums for address fields are street name and street number. Could you go back and add a street name to these buildings? Thank you :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
gscscnd (2019-02-24 15:42:35+00:00): 1. Niepotrzebnie usunąłeś tag building=school z budynku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288483602. Niepotrzebnie dodałeś tag amenity=school do tego budynku — ten tag jest już przypisany do obszaru  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455111546. Również tag name znajduje się już na obszarze 455111546.
2. Usunąłeś punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4465317171 i zastąpiłeś go punktem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6296869351 — w ten sposób straciliśmy informację o kierunku przystanku oraz powiązanie między przystankiem a punktem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6274582990 (realizowane przez relację https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9320105).

Poprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67520135.
gscscnd (2019-02-24 15:10:05+00:00): Czy droga dla jeźdźców i droga dla pieszych są od siebie oddzielone?
Kiiijek (2019-02-24 23:22:25+00:00): Tak, są oddzielone.
maraf24 (2019-02-25 12:11:11+00:00): Dlaczego to jest oznakowane jako droga dla koni? Jest tam taki znak? Jak on wygląda, bo nigdy go nie widziałem?
Kiiijek (2019-02-25 13:03:39+00:00): Nie ma takiego znaku, ale taki znak, z tego, co wiem, nawet nie istnieje. Podejście pod drogą zostało wybudowane dla koni, lecz w świetle prawa rzeczywiście nie jest tylko dla koni. Być może jest też wykorzystywane przez jakieś pojazdy - tego nie wiem. Zmienię więc drogę tylko dla koni na zwykłą drogę (jak było wcześniej) i dodam zostawię chodnik, bo wiem, że tam jest.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:52:58+00:00): Pitch edited into weird shape. Repaired in #67485213
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:33:27+00:00): Reverted in #67485246
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:51:59+00:00): Damaged roads, area incorrect, tagging dodgy, will require revert.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:15:26+00:00): Reverted in Changeset: 67485560
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:54:22+00:00): Will (probably) require revert, part of vandalism spree.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:31:25+00:00): Reverted in #67485663 and #67485659
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:36:33+00:00): Pitches deleted with no true justification - good information (discussion with local) indicates these pitches are still present. Will require a revert.
Very likely continuation of on-going vandalism of this area. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2536 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2537
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:18:32+00:00): Reverted in CS #67485578
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:55:16+00:00): Reverted in: #67485273
MiPiAi (2019-02-23 02:17:39+00:00): I accidentally included the source as "local knowledge". This is incorrect: mapping was done from Bing image along.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:41:01+00:00): Requires revert, Rochester Municipal Park changed to nature reserve, boundaries fudged up.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:21:14+00:00): Reverted in CS #67485598
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:47:18+00:00): Reverted, changed from nature reserve back to a park. Reported this sock puppet to DWG, again.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:44:14+00:00): Requires revert, Wabash park shrunk to small area and changed to a nature reserve.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:24:31+00:00): Reverted vandalism in Changeset 67485622.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:56:46+00:00): Requires revert, area shrunk, changed to nature reserve.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:57:28+00:00): Also, tagging on section of road deleted, obviously also requires a revert.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:26:58+00:00): Both issues reverted in  CS #67485641
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:58:01+00:00): Reverted in #67485337 - vandalism.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 02:58:50+00:00): Likely requires revert, possible part of vandalism spree, changed to nature reserve along with other legitimate parks.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-23 03:31:49+00:00): Reverted in #67485663 and #67485659
viloan (2019-02-23 02:47:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hjart (2019-02-23 08:27:49+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at låger mm skal "klikkes" effektivt på stier/veje for at have nogen effekt på navigation ad disse. Jeg har rettet et par af dem her.
Frimmer (2019-02-23 18:37:12+00:00): Hi Hjart

Tak for opmærksomheden!

God weekend!
viloan (2019-02-23 03:14:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ma-rt-in (2019-12-30 07:54:49+00:00): Hallo,
derzeit läuft in dieser Note, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2039712 , eine Diskussion zu den von die entfernten Brücken. Kannst du dich mal dazu äußern?!
vg
Supaplex (2019-02-23 06:14:07+00:00): There is two drinking water machine in the Metro Station.
Alouette955 (2019-12-29 18:40:07+00:00): Le building 234614169 ne devrait-il pas être défini comme terminus d'autobus plutôt que station de métro? 

Selon les règles PTv2 on ne peut avoir qu'un station=subway par station de métro.
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-24 18:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67524306 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
chnav (2019-02-24 14:37:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, как-то странно видеть удаление геометрии и перерисовка по-новой от опытного картографа. В JOSM есть команда Replace Geometry (Ctrl-Shift-G) для таких случаев. В плагине UtilsPlugin2   https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/UtilsPlugin2
MrKrisKrisu (2019-03-07 23:28:17+00:00): Woher beziehst du die Informationen, dass im kompletten Tunnelsystem 70km/h Maximalgeschwindigkeit ist? 

Ich habe bisher nur Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen zu 60 km/h gesehen.
MrKrisKrisu (2019-03-08 15:19:37+00:00): Habe die Geschwindigkeiten vor Ort Stichprobenartig im vorbeifahren nochmal kontrolliert. Sie haben sich nicht verändert, daher:

reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67926520
mavl (2019-02-23 09:33:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
  
В названии какого-либо объекта нужно указывать только названия. Слово "Аптека" - это не название. Тег amenity=pharmacy сообщает, что это именно аптека.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
MrKrisKrisu (2019-03-07 23:47:44+00:00): Wurden die Schilder in den letzten 3 Tagen ausgetauscht? Ich errinere mich noch daran, dass dort vor kurzem noch ganz klar eine "6" stand.
MrKrisKrisu (2019-03-08 14:59:16+00:00): Vor Ort geprüft. Auf den Schildern steht weiterhin eine Begrenzung von 60.

Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67925705
Carto'Cité (2019-02-28 15:19:33+00:00): Bonjour John,
Je me suis permis de restaurer cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23054998) car tu l'avais remplacée pour un way équivalent mais on perdait tous l'historique. J'ai aussi enlevé le cycleway:right=track car la piste cyclable est déjà cartographiée séparément. Dis moi si je suis passé à coté de quelque chose.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
mavl (2019-02-23 09:37:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названии должно быть только название. Если детский сад называется "Лесовичок" (Лесовичек - это явно опечатка), то именно это и нужно указать для тега "name". Для того чтобы указать полное официальное название, можно использовать тег official_name.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
MrKrisKrisu (2019-03-08 14:57:07+00:00): Was ist hier deine Quelle für die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen?

Ich sehe vor Ort keine G2 7er Schilder am Tunnel. Nur 6er.
mavl (2019-02-23 09:39:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Номер телефона принято указывать в международном формате (проект OpenStreetMap международный), например:  
phone=+7 34542 45639  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
mavl (2019-02-23 09:41:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это случайно не дубликат Областной Лебедёвской психиатрической больницы, которая уже обозначена?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234326375
mavl (2019-02-23 09:43:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OpenStreetMap избегают сокращений в названиях.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Rostyslav_ua (2019-02-23 07:33:41+00:00): Як прибрати ту рекламу?
Myazyk (2019-03-08 21:24:47+00:00): Яку ту рекламу?
streckenkundler (2019-03-05 08:49:22+00:00): Hei, ich muß mal ein kleinwenig nach der Sinnhaftigkeit dieses MP-Monsters nachfragen... Das Ding hat jetzt schon <2000 Inner-Rollen und ist defakto fast nicht mehr sinnvoll zu bearbeiten.

streckenkundler
mavl (2019-02-23 09:47:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. "ФАП" - это не название. Это вид объекта. Также ФАП - это не гоститаль или больница (amenity=hospital). Часто ФАП обозначают как:  
amenity=doctors  
inscription=ФАП  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:inscription
mavl (2019-02-23 09:50:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это очень необычное здание. Во-первых, оно непрямоугольное. Во-вторых, очень большое (50 метров на 50 метров). Это точно не ошибка?
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-23 08:55:12+00:00): Hi SALMANSEZO, welcome to OSM.

Same here, may I know the reason, behind deleting several mapped objects, which have been created just five days ago? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67487753
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-23 08:53:22+00:00): Hi SALMANSEZO, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason, behind deleting several mapped objects, which have been created just ten days ago? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67487761
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-23 08:52:15+00:00): Hi SALMANSEZO, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason, behind deleting the entire soccer field and the surrounding footways? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67488038
rene78 (2019-02-23 17:56:49+00:00): don't spam the map please
Jakka (2019-02-23 10:53:30+00:00): Même remarque autre possibilité https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine
Jakka (2019-02-23 10:50:29+00:00): Merci pour les ajouts.
place_of_worship je trouve cela un peut grand, je pense une chapelle  ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dshrine
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
axelr (2019-02-24 10:36:42+00:00): Der Name des vereinheitlichten operators ist im wiki VRR mit SWN festgelegt. Ich würde zwar wegen des geringen Bekanntheitsgrades auch "Stadtwerke Neuss" bevorzugen. Die derzeitige Geselschaftsform der Stadtwerke interessiert bei osm nicht. Zur Vermeidung persönlichen Bevorzugungen sollten derartige Massenänderungen vorher diskutiert werden.