piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Burricane (2019-10-15 16:06:26+00:00): Hello nyoma!

I’ve noticed that you’ve recently made edits to the ref network within Ukraine by changing a number of T refs to O refs. May I ask what resource you are referencing for these changes? By my understanding, O-###### refs are local routes, while T-##-## refs are more significant in the nationwide scheme, and deserving of the secondary classification, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%92%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D0%B0/%D0%9A%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%84%D1%96%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B3. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks!

-Burricane
nyoma (2019-11-10 07:41:39+00:00): http://koda.gov.ua/normdoc/pro-zatverdzhennya-perelikiv-avtomobi-2/
Burricane (2019-11-11 23:25:40+00:00): Hi Nyoma,

Thanks for sending me this resource. I also discovered a related resource regarding national refs, especially T refs:  https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/55-2019-%D0%BF

 I noticed there was an issue with relation 5912674 - the way tags are correct but relation needs to be updated. I will update this. 

Thanks again
Warin61 (2019-10-01 11:16:39+00:00): Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=135.54507&lat=-31.29734&zoom=12
Aleksandar1994 (2019-10-01 11:30:37+00:00): Thanks for info I have fixed it.
czubi (2019-10-04 14:37:48+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.9813194&lon=11.0303325&zoom=20&camera.theta=44.19&camera.phi=-27.112

?
MerlinPendragon (2019-09-30 14:30:34+00:00): Hello!

This service road no longer exists. Everything in this area was recently torn down for new development. In general, if a road you're adding to the map goes through another building that someone else has already added (as it does here), it's probably a good idea to double-check.
utkap (2019-10-01 08:06:41+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the comment. Apologies for the edit, I haven't noticed that the edit was recently made, due to which I had assumed the building according to Mapbox imagery. I've now corrected the road under changeset #75134600.

Regards,
utkap
eggie (2019-09-30 09:07:44+00:00): Nr 183 bevindt zich op het gebouw.
OrionX (2019-10-23 22:32:26+00:00): Исправлено
eggie (2019-09-30 09:06:38+00:00): Maak svp gebruik van de aresnode op het gebouw.
Gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2019-09-30 15:51:49+00:00): Reverted change to russian water tagging schema usage. We do not use russian water schema in Lithuania.
Minh Nguyen (2019-09-30 08:51:34+00:00): Also used CAGIS 2019 orthophotography.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-30 13:08:29+00:00): Hello,
I've not got my glasses, but I guess "Boots Optitians" should be "Boots Opticians"?
Best Regards,
Andy
yourealwaysbe (2019-10-02 08:38:35+00:00): Good catch. It should be fixed now. Thanks.
eggie (2019-09-30 09:05:38+00:00): Dag Anduxor.. Probeer als het even kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. 
Dus niet nog een keer het adres aanmaken.
MVG,
Eggie
Anduxor (2019-10-01 18:09:24+00:00): Ja excuses
eggie (2019-10-01 18:58:50+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen :)

MVG,
Eggie
OrionX (2019-10-23 22:32:46+00:00): Исправлено
osmviborg (2019-09-30 15:39:57+00:00): En del rettelser her. Undlad en anden gang at tilføje adresse oplysninger på bygninger. Du har givet bygninger navne, jeg har rettet det til beskrivelse. Hvorfor du havde samlet det hele i en multipolygon ved jeg ikke, den er fjernet.
mavl (2019-11-07 14:16:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-30 17:54:59+00:00): Olá Bruno, bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap. reparei que o nome que dá ao conjunto de alterações é sempre o mesmo. Convém alterar e descrever o que fez. Da forma que está a proceder não é a correta. 
Outra questão é que você retirou a etiqueta de building do edificio da igreja. Atendendo que a igreja está como ponto, a etiqueta de edificio deve persistir no edificio. Nao deve haver elementos duplicados no mapa com elementos diferentes.

Agradeço que corrija. 

Qualquer questão disponha que esclareço.
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-11-07 14:16:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-11-07 14:15:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
czubi (2019-10-04 14:31:30+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.9801826&lon=11.0225441&zoom=20&camera.theta=65.963&camera.phi=135.218

?
mavl (2019-11-07 14:15:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-09-30 11:43:33+00:00): Dag Weeffout. Weet je het zeker. Je hebt van een highway=unclassified een highway=path (smal paadje) gemaakt. het zal niet meer routeren voor voertuigen met vier wielen. is dat echt je bedoeling.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 11:46:12+00:00): Dit zijn je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75088991
eggie (2019-09-30 11:47:26+00:00): Is het wellicht een highway=track?. Bij geen reactie draai ik de changeset terug.
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 12:01:13+00:00): Dit is zo onwaarschijnlijk dat een unclassified een smal paadje is geworden. Ok heb de changeset teruggedraaid.
reverted by changeset #75096692
Veel gravelwegen in Zweden zijn gewoon als unclassified getagd  Wel zou je dan nog surface=gravel en de maxspeed weer kunnen toevoegen.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Ook op luchtfoto's is het geen paadje.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-09-30 15:27:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2019-11-07 16:43:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-09-30 11:41:31+00:00): Dag Weeffout, 
Goed dat je zaken actueel maakt. 

Sipsdump & Outdoor is hier 2x gemapt.
het beste kun je alle info overzetten naar de BAG adresnode en de overbodige veranderen. 
Op welk adres hoort Viking schietsport? Dan ook graag op de aanwezige adresnode bijtaggen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 12:05:56+00:00): Duplikaatinfo verwijderd en alles op de adresnode gezet.
Syl (2019-10-07 16:43:57+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé ce nœud.
OpenStreetMap n'est pas fait pour ajouter des éléments fictifs. Les données sont utilisées très largement et il est important qu'elles soient le plus véridique possible (d'autant plus que vous comptiez le laisser deux mois).
Vous pouvez regarder du côté de Umap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:UMap) pour voir si cela correspond à vos besoins.
Cordialement.
eggie (2019-09-30 11:30:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Eigenlijk hoef je bicycle=no niet aan te geven op een wandelpad. Dat routeert niet voor fietsers.
MVG,
Eggie
NKA (2019-09-30 16:45:34+00:00): Flott at flere importerer stedsnavn.
Det er nå 760 peaks i Larvik, og kartet ser ut som alpene. Jeg vil tro at det bare er ca 10 stk fjelltopper i Larvik som er prominente nok til å være peaks. Resten synes jeg burde være natural=hill.
7rst1 (2019-09-30 17:32:15+00:00): Ja, la merke til dette mens jeg importerte. Siden det var en enkel prosess valgte jeg å utføre den og heller "degradere" de fleste peaks til hills senere. Har tenkt å gjøre det i løpet av uka :)
NKA (2019-09-30 18:27:29+00:00): Et tips: Toppene med høyde kan importeres fra N50, om du vil ha med høyden. Da blir det også litt mer nøyaktig plassering, siden nodene fra SSR egentlig ikke treffer det høyeste punktet. Eller de kan flyttes manuelt ift. N50 bakgrunnskart.
7rst1 (2019-09-30 20:09:08+00:00): Jeg har sett over de fleste toppenes posisjon med høydekurver, og de ser greie ut håper jeg.
Jeg har nå endret nesten alle toppene til hills og latt noen få være peaks. Gjerne se over endringssettet og sjekk om det ser greit ut :)
daganzdaanda (2019-09-30 22:26:04+00:00): Hi, ein ganz großes Dankeschön, das ist richtig gut geworden! Ich habe nur ein Kleinigkeiten geändert z.B. die Ampeln an die Haltelinien gesetzt und "placement" zum lane-tagging ergänzt. Maxar hat einen Versatz im Vergleich zu den Bayern-Bildern, da habe ich manchmal ein wenig die Lage verschoben.
aceman444 (2019-10-04 05:59:04+00:00): Hi, why did you put back the buses 2 and 3 in Komarno to stop at node 3314624989? I have visited the bus station recently and seen they stop at node 6831656809? I intentionally changed all the routes to stop there.
I didn't change bus 228 as I do not know where that one stops.
zokert (2019-10-04 10:18:05+00:00): Hello.

Nem szándékosan állítottam vissza a komárnói 2-es, 3-as busz megállóit. Én is szerkesztettem valamit a környéken, csak te megelőztél és nálam ütközést jelzett a rendszer. A javításából meg káosz (keveredés) lett. Sorry. A 228-as busz az 1-es kocsiállásról indul ("DÉL-KOMÁROM")

Hello.

I did not intentionally reset bus stops 2, 3 of Komarno. I also edited something in the area, only you were ahead of me and the system signaled a collision. His repair has become chaos. Sorry. Bus 228 departs from Wagon 1 ("DÉL-KOMÁROM") (for google translator)
aceman444 (2019-10-04 17:25:35+00:00): Ah OK :) So can I put the buses back to stop at Autobusová stanica - Autóbusz-pályaudvar at node 6831656809 where I have seen them to depart? It was a lot of work to update them, but I can do it again.

Thanks for updating the bus routes in Komarno when they change. I have also  added the bus stop Dohany-utca and it seems now you have moved it to the proper location. Thanks.
zokert (2019-10-07 08:02:33+00:00): I still can't find a bus stop where buses 3 and 8 stop. This is "Ul.slobody - Freedom Street" (formerly "Soneco - Soneco").  The OSM is only marked around a map, but there is no sign of a bus stop there. There is a bus waiting on Družstevna close to Slobody, but it's not.
aceman444 (2019-10-08 20:24:53+00:00): Sorry, I don't know where that bus stop is. I only visited the main bus station to check where the city buses stop. I'm going to fix them again :)
user_5359 (2019-09-30 15:28:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2019-09-30 11:37:51+00:00): Dag weeffout.. Probeer aan te geven wat je edits inhouden.
Een adres liever niet toevoegen. Er is al een import adresnode van het Kadaster.
Wat bedoel je hier met ele.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele?uselang=nl
Het geeft de hoogte aan boven zeeniveau. 
operator prive  hoort niet op een adres zonder andere info. 
Graag het hele adres weer weghalen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 12:14:58+00:00): De duplikaatnode heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
De naam van de voormalige school mag natuurlijk ook op het gebouw zelf als deze naam nog gebruikt wordt.
Wilde je misschien het aantal verdiepingen aangeven?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Eggie
cquest (2019-10-01 07:24:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue !

J'ai laissé le polygone décrivant l'emprise du bâtiment détruit pour qu'il ne soit pas recréé par erreur en se bsant sur une source non à jour (cadastre, image aérienne, etc).

Merci de ne pas le supprimer et bonnes contributions, la zone en a besoin !
AndersAndersson (2019-09-30 21:19:06+00:00): Are you sure this is the church?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598641624

I know it used to be the building north west of that one.
amv123 (2019-10-01 07:25:49+00:00): will check and revert to what it is. I think this is the entire building up to the end of street corner.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-19 20:43:38+00:00): Did you have the possibillity to check this?
opendcc (2019-09-30 11:19:27+00:00): Hallo,

eine vorsichtige Frage: bist Du da schon mal vor Ort gewesen? Und sorry, ein Phantasiename als alt_name für eine Gemeinde ist der Qualität von OSM eher abträglich.

Servus Wolfgang
pebogufi (2019-09-30 11:28:41+00:00): Der Kreisel ist von der Gemeinde mit Anbringung eines Schildes so genannt worden.
Den Artikel in der Sueddeutschen (-> source) hast gelesen ?
pebogufi (2019-09-30 11:31:26+00:00): Inwieweit ist es wichtig, ob ich schon mal dort war ? Quelle meiner Info ist ja angegeben.
opendcc (2019-09-30 11:56:49+00:00): Das ist schon wichtig, wenn man den falschen Ort taggt. Ich kann ja auch nicht einfach irgendwo Lummerland hintaggen, nur weil ich es in einer Zeitung gelesen habe.
pebogufi (2019-09-30 12:29:44+00:00): Ich habe alle 7 Filme gesehen und war mir sicher, den Kreisel aus dem Satelitenfoto erkannt zu haben, er hat in den Filmen eine besondere Bedeutung, und wird in jedem Film mehrfach gezeigt. Nachdem ich nun einen Filmauschnitt nochmal angesehen habe, muss ich zugeben, dass es der falsche ist und habe den AS revergiert.
opendcc (2019-09-30 13:44:17+00:00): Tipp: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.55386/12.52482&layers=N

Und ja, ich war da selbst vor Ort und habe eine extra Runde gedreht ;-)
Warin61 (2019-09-30 23:31:16+00:00): Reverted. Relation 9385711 restored - Whitlam area not arboretum.

Relation corrected as it should have been. Now has inners as well as a completed outer.
mario7436 (2019-09-30 23:35:20+00:00): What evidence do you have that the relation is correct, or need? The satellite photos provide no information about this. :-)
mario7436 (2019-09-30 23:36:13+00:00): The Arboretum is a small and well defined area.
Warin61 (2019-10-01 05:20:12+00:00): The arboretum is not in this area. 

The relation has existed for some time before your edits. I use some QA tools to check for errors, usually daily .. there were no errors here before your past edit. Your past edit removed many ways from the relationship, some of these to update, but some of that removal caused the remaining relationship to become open. 

You altered the tags from meadow to grassland so you must agree that there is that ground cover there?

Removing the relation makes the area around Glenloch appear blank on the map .. so there is nothing here? I think there is something here.. probably a meadow with mostly grasses. And you can see some evidence of it from imagery.
mario7436 (2019-10-01 05:32:23+00:00): Yes, it is a paddock. Two small farms, Glenloch and the one beside it. Previously "meadow" for grazing. Grassland implies that there is no agriculture. Both are grass though. Does seeing a cow count?
Warin61 (2019-10-01 10:51:06+00:00): Not many places would run one cow. Glenlock station listed as a working farm ... 
https://www.schoolactivities.com.au/school-activities-directory/glenloch-station
and a story to tellhttps://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/5992679/growing-up-on-the-glenloch-property-the-life-of-a-canberra-pioneer/
mario7436 (2019-10-02 00:17:33+00:00): Agree. Small, working farms in this area. I am not suggesting one cow. If a grassland is not used for agriculture but a meadow is, what is the difference? I think one cow in the paddock is enough to change the tag. "no cows"=gassland
mario7436 (2019-10-02 00:20:38+00:00): Another point. A paddock (meadow) is a closed relation. If the fence is missing or its got holes big enough for a truck to drive through, then it is not a paddock. "closed fencing and gates"=meadow and "unfence area (or gaps)"=grassland. Fenclines are visible in OSM.
Warin61 (2019-10-02 02:05:30+00:00): Many 'paddocks' are rather large .. and may not have 'fencing'. Think of the 'paddocks' in central Australia... However in this area I would expect there to be some fencing to stop stock wandering on to roads. 
There may not be stock in a paddock due to stock rotation - to give the paddock a 'rest'.
mario7436 (2019-10-02 07:19:52+00:00): Yes, true. Not many farms left in Canberra. Some hobby farms, e.g. these 2. Close to the city for work. Some animals. Private property. Very small "paddocks" 30x40m are usually for horse(s) - see north William Hovell Drive .
mario7436 (2019-10-04 08:36:36+00:00): A dozen cows seen in the paddock here https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-35.2771&mlon=149.0719#map=16/-35.2771/149.0719
eggie (2019-10-02 15:44:17+00:00): Door schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus (liever niet doen) kun je per abuis heel makkelijk nodes verplaatsen. Zo staat adresnode Middeleeuwen 22 heel ergens anders en kan ik nr 33 helemaal niet meer vinden. Hier zie jje je edits

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75184435
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-02 15:48:38+00:00): Adresnodes hersteld. nr 33 lag ergens bij de Merovingen en zat vastgeplakt aan de landuse construction
eggie (2019-10-02 15:48:57+00:00): adresnode 22 hersteld
eggie (2019-09-30 12:18:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 12:20:57+00:00): Beste Jos,  Alle gebouwinfo en adressen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten. Beter is het daar niets aan te veranderen. Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het Kadaster doorgeven. Luchtfoto's vertekenen omdat ze vaak niet schuin zijn genomen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-30 12:32:16+00:00): Bij het Kadaster staat het wel goed ingetekend.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=molenweg%206a%20kil&resultOffset=0&objectId=1955100000007901&geometry.x=213123.68499573&geometry.y=439589.22299851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1955010000031140
Normaliter worden gebouwen periodiek ge updated. Je kunt ook zelf een update aanvragen op het forum van OSM.
Het gebouw wordt dan met de juiste gegevens geupdated.
Dat kan in het draadje verzoek BAG import op ons forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG.
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-10-03 17:50:56+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729891457. Don't add no standard keys and don't add processing note like 504=DONE.
Leo Slager (2019-10-01 10:21:37+00:00): Het voetpad was niet met de andere weg verbonden.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.72596&lat=52.95098&zoom=18&opacity=0.86
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2019-10-01 09:12:28+00:00): Когда ты рвёшь землепользование, ты причиняешь мне боль.
ID`s (2019-10-01 09:33:37+00:00): Можно указать какое именно я порвал? Может не заметил. Вроде все по соединял в полигоны.
ID`s (2019-10-01 09:36:22+00:00): Или имеется ввиду отклеивание от дорог?
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2019-10-01 11:11:57+00:00): Не отклеивание, а отрывание дорог от их родимых жилых зон! Как же теперь в них въехать? Неужели навигатор оставит людей без крыши над головой? (заболело сердце)
ID`s (2019-10-01 11:27:13+00:00): Не пойму проблему. Навигатор начинает некорректно информацию выдавать, или что? Каким образом "отрывание" landuse=residential от роут-системы влияет на навигацию? Жилая территория покрывает место жизни человека и его активной деятельности. Дома, детские площадки, внутриквартальные проезды, как этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404534510 или этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144194961 . Но на обочине центральных дорог только у бездомных жизнь происходить может.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2019-10-01 11:30:18+00:00): Чел, я же шучу, а ты воспринимаешь всерьёз 😃
ID`s (2019-10-01 11:33:41+00:00): Я тугой на троллинг в вещах, к которым я серьезно отношусь, знаю) Но не обидчивый. Я, кста, в ближайшее время, с большой долей вероятности, в Гданцевский парк попаду. Таки договорился.
mavl (2019-10-01 15:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75159390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects, vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3194].
mavl (2019-10-01 15:41:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75159390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects, vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3194].
Leo Slager (2019-09-30 23:49:04+00:00): With this changeset you damaged route-relation bus 147.
It has been repaired.
Be more careful in future please.
mavl (2019-10-01 15:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75159390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects, vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3194].
mavl (2019-10-01 15:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75159390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects, vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3194].
eggie (2019-10-25 18:30:33+00:00): Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed, maar die sloten zul je netjes moeten inpassen in de landuse.
Wanneer je dat niet kunt dan kun je sloten ook toevoegen op een lijnelement met waterway=ditch
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-25 19:14:17+00:00): Sloten ingebed in de landuse..
czubi (2019-09-30 15:31:10+00:00): Hallo, 
es wäre schön wenn wir mal kommunizieren würden bevor du alle Gebäude in Erfurt geändert hast
WoodWoseWulf (2019-09-30 21:26:00+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Thanks for your recent additions!

Some feedback on this edit: You've used the name= key to tag descriptions (a park named "viewing area" or a road named "access road" as examples). This is generally not the best way to add information to objects on the map.

As an example, rather than tagging the viewing area as a park named "viewing area", it's better to tag it as a viewpoint (tourism=viewpoint) and then save the name tag for any name it might actually have, such as "Louis Blériot Memorial Viewing Platform" or even just leave the name field blank.

Anyway,

Thanks again for contributing to OSM :) happy mapping!
mavl (2019-10-01 15:41:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75159390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects, vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3194].
woodpeck (2019-10-08 13:46:19+00:00): Die Kombination "lanes=2" mit "lanes:forward=2" und "lanes:forward=2", die hier zum Teil vergeben wurde, ist nicht sinnvoll.
Galbinus (2019-10-08 17:53:00+00:00): Sollte diese Kombi von mir in der Version vor dem Revert eingebaut worden sein, handelt es sich um ein Versehen, da ich diese Kombination seit einiger Zeit meide. Das habe ich in der Vergangenheit anders gemacht, bin aber seit einiger Zeit dabei die Doppelung von lanes ohne Richtungsangabe mit lanes mit Richtungsangabe zu korrigieren Hat mir zwar keiner gesagt, ich habe aber festgestellt, das z.B. OSMAND mit dieser Doppelung nicht klar kommt. Und da die allgemeine lanes-Zahl sich aus den richtungsabhängigen lanes-Zahlen ergibt, kann diese überflüssige Info entfallen.