piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osm915 (2019-10-01 19:49:33+00:00): Hi gabs
I try to improve some building shapes.
The newest satellite imagery I cound find for crete was "Maxar Standard Imagery". But it does not show the new Epos Hotel. Could you give me a tip which source you used for the hotel shape? Bing seems not to be correct.
Best regards!
gabs90 (2019-10-02 05:25:30+00:00): Hi osm915,

the hotel opened this year (2019). Therefore, I can understand that it is not visible on most images. Maxar does not show it, also Bing also has no building there and google also. 
My knowledge of the building shape is from being personally at the spot and taking photos. So the sizes are not exact, but the shape is okay.
Thank you for your work!

regards,

gabs
osm915 (2019-10-02 10:07:29+00:00): 
Hi gabs
thanks for the fast response and the clarification!
I was mislead by your changeset-metadata "imagery_used=Bing aerial imagery".
Georgioupoli is indeed a nice place for holidays.
Best regards!
gabs90 (2019-10-03 05:35:25+00:00): Hi,

the metadata probably is automatically added from the editor because I was in sat-view mode. Sorry, I did not know that.
The corners could be more rectangular. I could not find an automatic tool for that.

regards,

gabs
osm915 (2019-10-04 09:37:18+00:00): Hi gabs, no problem!
Maybe you could add the source-information to the changeset comment next time ;-)

With the iD editor you can use the shortcut "q" to make corners rectangular or right click on any way to find the option. Shortcut "?" does help too.

If you plan to rework the hotel, I have two more suggestions:
-> in my opinion it is best to assign the tags to a way around the whole area of a hotel und only use a node (near the entrance) if the area is not known. So I would take node 6700072659, extend it to a way around the area of the hotel and move the tags to this way.
-> right now the map shows the hotel twice, so I would suggest to delete the name from the building

Just tell me if you do not want to do it yourself ...
Best regards!
gabs90 (2019-10-07 15:50:22+00:00): Hi osm915,

I tried to improve the angles of the building. 

Would you care for the name tags etc? I used a hotel and a building name because the hotel is inconsequent about its own name: they sometimes include "beach" in their name and sometimes leave it out. 

Thank you!

best,

gabs
osm915 (2019-10-07 19:49:16+00:00): Hi gabs
looks good to me. Lets come back in a few years (or so) to adjust the shape to newer satelite images ;-)

I just took take care of the rest. Regarding the name, I prefere the name that is written on the builiding or at the entrance. If there are two real possibilities, I use the larger (or more common) one for the "name" and put the other one into the "alt_name" tag.

Thanks again and have a good time!
eggie (2019-08-11 13:03:27+00:00): Dag Neo..  Het voetpad is nog steeds een gevangenis. Je kunt alleen bij de parkeerplaats eraf. Routeren zal het dus niet.
Kijk nog eens een keer.
MVG,
Eggie
ma-rt-in (2019-08-11 23:50:05+00:00): Hallo.
ist der Treff zu? Wenn ja dann korrekt anpassen!
vg
mr_pi (2019-08-13 08:39:30+00:00): Hallo.
Der Treff 3000 war eine Supermarktkette die nun dauerhaft geschlossen ist. Was wäre die korrekte Anpassung?
vg
BeKri (2019-08-13 11:45:49+00:00): Servus,
jetzt ist BEIDES drin
disused:shop 	supermarket
UND
shop 	supermarket
brand* und name können letztlich auch raus, shop ist ja disused
Gruss derBeKri
ma-rt-in (2019-08-13 18:41:25+00:00): Nach einer kurzen Recherche wurde wohl der Treff aufgelöst, da es in Mülheim und Neumagen bereit einen Netto gibt.
Somit bau ich das mal um hier.
BeKri (2019-08-14 00:37:49+00:00): JePPP ;-))
genau das war wohl,
auf das dich
 ma-rt-in
hinweise wollte ...
;-))
Gruss derBeKri
mr_pi (2019-08-16 08:04:41+00:00): Hallo,

okay. Danke für die Aufklärung. Werde ich beim nächsten mal so umsetzen.

Gruß mr_pi
Zouk-Nomad (2026-02-05 21:22:40+00:00): Restaurant: La Table Berbere
marczoutendijk (2021-12-23 19:33:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250781648
historic=* is describing or characterising an object and not a date. It seems you have been trying to put a date in the historic key. Maybe you should use start_date?
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ahistoric and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
❤यार तेरा बैरी (2019-08-11 12:48:16+00:00): Insta will be not work
StephaneP (2019-08-26 15:02:56+00:00): hello etiennecrb !
Bienvenu sur Osm !!

Il y donc eu des travaux Rue de Lagny ?
Si tu veux en savoir plus sur la façon de tagger les voies cyclables, tu as un résumé ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
etiennecrb (2019-08-27 10:59:46+00:00): Hello ! Oui la piste est désormais isolée entre le boulevard davout et le passage de Lagny, le reste de mes modifications est juste une mise à jour. Merci pour ton lien, j'avais fait des recherches et bizaremment j'étais tombé sur une autre page qui dans mes souvenirs étaient moins détaillée, je vais vérifier que ça colle.
Warin61 (2019-08-15 06:48:05+00:00): HI,
Welcome to OSM.. 
In this changeset the way for an industrial area was changed such that it crosses itself, that is not good. 
As your were not attempting to change the industrial are (? from your rather brief changeset comment of 'houses') I have removed the nodes, that are part of the buildings, from the industrial areas way. 

Keep mapping and take care.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-15 05:22:17+00:00): Hi Der Profi, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

Could you please revert your map changes? Thanks.

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-15 05:22:33+00:00): Hi Der Profi, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

Could you please revert your map changes? Thanks.

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Pierce (2019-08-26 19:50:17+00:00): Hi,

I've just come across this relation which appears to be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3104327
Ewen Hill (2019-08-26 22:38:01+00:00): Yes, that's not good - The smaller one that travels along the railway is an ABS area it appears. Happy for you to edit this or I can do this later this week.
Ewen Hill (2019-08-27 10:02:22+00:00): The smaller area has been downgraded by removing the admin_level=10 and boundary as well as adding 2011 ABS to the name as I didn't want to delete it entirely. Also reduced Watchem as clearly no where near here. Hope this is sorted now
eggie (2019-08-11 13:39:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-15 05:22:46+00:00): Hi Der Profi, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

Could you please revert your map changes? Thanks.

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
eggie (2019-08-11 13:25:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SimonPoole (2019-08-17 14:03:53+00:00): Hallo, bitte keine swisstopo Layers verwenden, diese können nicht für OSM verwendet werden da die Inhälte sind meistens keine offenen Daten, generell sollte daher map.geo.admin.ch als "off limit" betrachtet werden.

Sowohl Adressen (http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/) wie auch Informationen zu Haltestellen (http://didok.osm.ch/) Können direkt benutzt weden.
SomeoneElse (2019-08-11 20:11:11+00:00): Hello,
Is your company really based out on the street outside a cafe?

That's what the location of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6700268884 would suggest.

Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2019-08-11 13:32:39+00:00): Dag Freek.. Alle adressen en gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster. Ook periodiek.
Je kun het versnellen door om import te vragen in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

We voegen dus niet zelf adressen en gebouwen toe.

Doe je dat zelf?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-11 14:09:45+00:00): Verzoek ingediend
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=758558#p758558
GinaroZ (2019-08-11 15:00:15+00:00): Where did you get this name from?
smeòrach (2019-08-11 16:52:21+00:00): Hi, it's a local name I've heard from the area but I couldn't find any "official" sources for it so I'll change it to loc_name when I get home
viloan (2019-08-11 13:26:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-08-11 14:02:42+00:00): Dag MD  Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Beter niet iets aan veranderen, want bij herimport wordt de boel weer overschreven.
Zijn het nu twee gebouwen geworden of is er een ondergronds deel?
MVG,
Eggie
user_10210920 (2019-08-11 14:29:34+00:00): Ja, een ondergrondse parkeerplaats onder het westerlijk gelegen gebouw. Ik weet niet of deze verder loopt dan het b ovengrondse gedeelte. Maar het zijn zeker twee verschillende gebouwen.

MVG Duff
eggie (2019-08-11 14:37:21+00:00): Laat maar even zo... Het probleem is dat die ondergrondse parkeergarages ook renderen als gebouwen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-12-27 17:14:30+00:00): name=Bench en name=wast_basket verwijderen svp. Priveinfo zou ik ook verwijderen in de description
Je edits
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73241966
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-27 21:00:45+00:00): removed name=
b-holdet (2019-08-11 22:40:10+00:00): Kan se at du ikke har været på stedet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6698617180#map=19/55.80985/12.37738

Dette er et fodgængerfelt med "ø".
Jeg bor her, så jeg ved at det er således.
Du slettede den gamle node, hvilket undrer mig, da den blot kunne være flyttet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2206303473/history

Gider du rette nodens attributter tilbage igen?
ElliottPlack (2020-06-18 13:33:19+00:00): Hello there. "fix roads" is not at all descriptive of this changeset. Could you explain a little more about what you're doing here? The use of localities as historic sites is unprecedented for the project. Localities are for mapping places of human settlement, not battlefields. We have a tag for that. While the work here at Gettysburg looks nice on OSM, the purpose of the project is to produce useful data for maps, not to make the openstreetmap homepage look good.
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-09-01 22:01:19+00:00): VitalieS, în legea privind statutul municipiului Chişinău, sectorul Rîșcani se scrie cu î din I, exact aceea se referă și la Raionul Rîșcani și Orașul Rîșcani.
ma-rt-in (2019-08-11 23:59:12+00:00): Hallo,
ist den die Sankt-Joseph-Straße noch bedeutsam das sie primary sein sollte?
vg
Barthwo (2019-08-12 06:14:45+00:00): Ich meine man muss sie als primary markieren, da sonst die B327 in der einen Richtung nicht durchgehend als primary markiert ist.
Deshalb ja auch meine Bemerkung, ob man nicht sogar die St.Joseph und die Trierer Str. nicht sogar als Teil der B327 markieren sollte in der Relation und als ref.
Barthwo (2019-08-12 06:18:52+00:00): Wo endet die B327 denn "offiziell"? Aber egal wo genau, ich denke die B52 und die B327 sollten sauber als "primary" verknüpft sein und das geht wegen der Einbahnregelung nur so.
ma-rt-in (2019-08-12 10:07:05+00:00): Die B327 sowie die B52 verlaufen NICHT durch die Sankt-Joseph-Straße. Bei Bundesstraßen enden an der L151. MMn sollte man überlegen die B327 ab der B4077 abzustufen und die B52 ab der L147 abzustufen, jeweils auf secondary. Da wir in OSM vorranig die Verkehrsbedeutung erfassen und nachgeordnet die staatliche Einordnung von Straßen mappen. Die Einabhnregelung ist auch nicht wirklich ausschlaggebend um einen Wohnstraße als Straße Kat.1 zu mappen.
Barthwo (2019-08-12 11:10:46+00:00): Ja, eben gerade wegen der Verkehrsbedeutung habe ich diese Änderung doch gemacht. Die St. Joseph-Straße ist eben keine Wohnstrasse, sondern Teil des "Innenstadtrings". Und alle Teile dieses Rings haben eine vergleichbare Verkehrsbedeutung. Wobei ich das so verstanden habe, daß AUSSERHALB von Ortschaften eher die Einstufung für die OSM Kategorisierung genommen wird und innerhalb die Verkehrsbedeutung. Deshalb halte ich die Herabstufung der Bundesstraßen nach deinem Vorschlag nicht für richtig. Die enden beide in Hermeskeil.
ma-rt-in (2019-08-12 11:14:28+00:00): Die Verkehrsbedeutung von Straßen ist unabhänig vonn i-welchen Ortsschaftsgrenzen.
Es ist halt fraglich, ob die B52/B327 in Hermeskeil so bedeutens ist, das diese als primary gekennzeichnet werden müssen. Beide enden in Hermeskeil. Wer von der B327 Richtung BAB will nutzt die B407. Wer von der B52 in Richtung Thalfang will nutzt ebenso die B407.
Barthwo (2019-08-12 14:40:26+00:00): Naja, ich habs so geändert, wie ich es für richtig halte. Man kann die St.Joseph Strasse aber auch wieder runterstufen. Aber ich würde dann nur eine Stufe senken auf secondary, da sie eben den Verkehr in Hermeskeil lenkt und innerörteliche Verkehrsbedeutung hat und eben nicht nur residential ist. Wenn du das für richtig hältst, dann ändere es, ich werde das nicht revertieren.
bbmiller (2019-08-12 20:14:28+00:00): Hey, I'm glad you chose to contribute to the map, but one of the principals of OpenStreetMap is that we only map things that are visible on the ground. Property lines aren't one of those things, and mapping them with a foot path definitely isn't a best practice.

I removed the path from the map, and wanted to let you know why.
degernfelder (2020-01-31 21:48:09+00:00): Nach Änderung bitte auch den Hinweis löschen. Danke
viloan (2019-08-11 13:52:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Davi Melo (2019-08-12 12:34:25+00:00): Por que a edição que eu fiz aparece quando o mapa está com 300m de zoom mas some quando está em 200m?
naoliv (2019-08-12 15:17:09+00:00): A renderização depende da carga dos servidores.
Dependendo do momento pode demorar um pouco para que os dados novos sejam renderizados.
eggie (2019-08-11 14:12:10+00:00): Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten door het Kadaster. Het zou dus precies moeten kloppen. 
anneer je luchtfoto's gebruikt en naar de daken gaat kijken word je op het verkeerde been gezet.
Is dat wellicht het geval?
eggie (2019-08-11 14:15:40+00:00): Ik draai deze changeset terug. Het is echt niet correct.
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-11 14:18:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #73242719
philippec (2019-08-14 21:16:24+00:00): Bedoelt u dat speelgoedwaterfonteintje ?
 Bent u zeker dat daar mag van gedronken worden ?  Hebt u de kleine opschriften van de fabrikant gelezen ?   https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.878853586754296&lng=4.718823786754297&z=17&pKey=UV-L9KvCg6oQ4SqpUTFzlw&focus=photo&x=0.3359192501573519&y=0.4680394059148155&zoom=0
cimm (2019-08-15 12:21:32+00:00): Geen idee meer eerlijk gezegd, denk niet dat het dat kraantje was, die is wat verder op de speeltuin als ik me niet vergis. Ik voeg je commentaar toe aan de POI en ik ga er nog eens langs.
Warin61 (2019-08-20 08:11:03+00:00): Hi,

The relation for Waranga Crescent has a problem. The outer ways of a relation should not touch one another. In this case it looks to me like the rear building is a garage and that can be separate building that touches the home. I'd put the address and other data from the relation on the home, and delete the relation.
Warin61 (2019-09-05 10:49:58+00:00): It is normal to respond to these change set comments. 

And you learn best by improving your own edits. The relation 9906791 still has this error.
user_6110846 (2019-08-16 19:59:18+00:00): ЧАСУ НЕ ТРАТЬ  НА ВІДПОВІДЬ 

Я  ВЖЕ ПОДАВ ЗАЯВКУ  НА ЛІКВІДАЦІЮ ЕЛЕКТРОННГОЇ ПОШТИ ДО ЯКОЇ ПРИВ ЯЗАНИЙ МІЙ ПРОФІЛЬ 

УСІМ КАРТОГРАФАМ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ СМПІЛЬНОТИ  ПЕРЕДВАЙ ПРИВІТ 
---- ВОНИ КРУТІ 

ОКРІМ ТЕБЕ 
шАНОВНИЙ РАХІТ 

Я ПОКИЛДАЮ ПРОЄКТ 

ТАК ШО ТИ ПІСЛЯ   
ОБЛОМУ У ВСІХ СФЕРАХ ЖИТТЯ 

ПОЗА ПРОЕКТОММ

МОЖЕШ ПОТІШИТИ СВОЄ ІНВАЛІДСЬКЕ ЕГО 



ПОТІШИТИ СВОЮ ШИЗОФРЕНІЮ 

ЯКА У ТЕБЕ Є ГЕНЕТИЧНО ЗАКЛАДЕНОЮ 

ПО ЧОЬЛОВІЧОМУ КОРОТКО 


ТИ НІХТО   І ЗВАИТИ ТЕБЕ   НІЯК 

ОСЬ ЧОМУ ТИ  У ПРОЕКТІ   ПОСТІЙНО  ШОТО З СЕБЕ КОРЧИШ 



БАЖАЮ  ОТРИМАТИ ОРГАЗМ ПІД ЧАС ЗНИЩЕННЯ   МОЄЇ РОБОТИ 

БО У РЕАЛЬНОМУ ЖИТТІ НА ТЕБЕ ВСІ КЛАДУТЬ   І ТИ ЗАБУВ ШО ТАКЕ ВЗАГАЛІ ОРГАЗМ
KKS (2019-08-16 20:51:59+00:00): крутяк :)
eggie (2019-08-11 14:26:24+00:00): Nu wel... maarprobeer op de adresnode bij te taggen en niet ergens buiten het gebouw. Ook niet zelf adressen aanmaken svp.
Er zijn al twee bijdragen teruggedraaid, maar je hebt helaas niet gereageerd, Zo kunnen we ook niet helpen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-11 14:34:27+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst
Mar23tje (2019-08-11 14:37:34+00:00): Ok
froland (2019-08-11 14:41:37+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contribution to the Vhello network mapping.

Unfortunately, your changeset also introduced some discrepancies to the network.
The tool I'm using to check these is available at: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/network/9894645.

Best regards,

froland
Polyglot (2019-08-16 07:49:13+00:00): Hi François, can we have a teleconference to discuss this? I'm basically adding these because they are a great test case for new functionality that is being added to the PT_Assistant plugin. I think you can benefit from using that plugin as well, so I'd love to show you what it can do.
yvecai (2020-06-15 18:11:07+00:00): Salut,
Pourquoi as-tu dupliqué les ways des pistes de ski ici?
Toutes ces pistes ont déjà leur relation depuis longtemps ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3431525#map=15/45.4903/2.8858 ).
Aussi, je doute que les pistes noires passent vraiment dans le bois, je suppose que toutes les pistes prennent le même chemin au départ, non?

Je veux bien me décarcasser à faire un rendu correct des pistes, mais là, je peux rien faire ;-) http://www.opensnowmap.org/?zoom=17&lat=45.50168&lon=2.90993

Salutations,
Yves
Velox (2019-08-15 12:47:41+00:00): This building looks offset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73242633
eggie (2019-08-15 17:36:31+00:00): Dag Hendrikklaas. Tip: Je kunt je werk waar je aan bezig bent ook opslaan in JOSM en later uploaden. Dan blijft zo'n nieuw ingetekend gebouw niet op de verkeerde plaats liggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Hendrikklaas (2019-11-24 23:28:14+00:00): Hi Eggie, ik heb deze week pas de tekeningen van en met de bijgebouwen gekregen. Met name het voorhuis was lastig, hoe dik zijn de buiten muren ?
eggie (2019-11-24 23:35:15+00:00): Letterlijk een heel kunstwerk!
Hendrikklaas (2019-11-25 12:35:24+00:00): Studie en archiefwerk heet dat en zoeken naar aardige mensen. Wordt vervolgd.
ian727 (2019-10-22 08:10:12+00:00): This changeset deleted a major connecting road (highway=unclassified): ID: 406746301, in Changeset #73242657

This change should be undone or the road remapped by the responsible author!
Frans S (2019-09-29 10:15:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please map more accurate. You often just draw a rectangular over a building instead of following the outlines. Also move the mapping to the footprint of a building when you map tall (high) buildings
Best regards and keep mapping
MKnight (2019-09-29 10:37:54+00:00): Hi, thx for the feedback.
i cannot see any significant Problems in this CS.
in the positions i can see some differences between maxar and esri. dunno what imagery is right or not, but i think its not necessary to set buildings exactly on millimeters.
Frans S (2019-09-30 10:16:19+00:00): Hello MKnight. Thanks for your comment, but am surprised by your answer which I did not expect from an expert in mapping as you.
We're not talking about millimetres offset and which imagery to be used, but about how tall buildings should be positioned and the accuracy of mapping.
I am not going to discuss this further here but invite you to continue this on the Validators channel of HOT  on Slack. 
So other validators can comment as well.
If you don't have an account, please register here
http://slack.hotosm.org
I look forward to your reaction
Best regards
MKnight (2019-09-30 10:34:48+00:00): i don't want to register at slack to find out, where the problem is here exactly.
Frans S (2019-09-30 15:00:54+00:00): It up to you
best regards
eggie (2019-08-11 14:51:56+00:00): Dag wouhero.. probeer aan te geven wat je edits inhouden. Dus "politiebureau toegevoegd".
MVG,
Eggie
Karl-Ernst Möllmann (2019-08-11 19:58:08+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip!
Fischkopp0815 (2019-08-12 06:27:40+00:00): Woher hast Du denn die Info zu diesem Briefkasten? Der ist seit ca. Januar 2018 nicht mehr vorhanden.Ich habe ihn damals selbst gelöscht.
johnny_1982 (2019-08-12 06:32:10+00:00): Ich bin gestern mit dem Fahrrad vorbei gefahren. Etwas zurückgesetzt von der Straße. Manchmal werden Briefkästen wegen Baustellen abgebaut und kommen später wieder zurück. Rest der Daten trage ich nach wenn ich wieder zu Hause bin (habe Foto).
maraf24 (2019-08-11 15:40:20+00:00): Naprawione.
user_5359 (2019-08-11 15:38:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2597271337/history
szydzio (2019-08-20 12:58:42+00:00): Dlaczego zdjąłes ograniczenie prędkości z ulicy Sowice - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667722191 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103782948 ?
Asteliks (2019-08-24 12:28:19+00:00): Ponieważ strefa ograniczenia prędkości nie tyczy się tej części ulicy Sowice.

Zdjęcie ze skrzyżowania Sowice/Michałowo. Zauważ znak kończący strefę ograniczenia do 40km/h na lewo od krzyża.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mKR3PEfyqG_7jAzLlPPi36k4nY9kA7tC/view?usp=sharing
szydzio (2019-08-26 08:56:21+00:00): OK, w takim razie zdejmij source:maxspeed=PL:zone40 lub jeszcze lepiej zmień ograniczenie na „standardowe” w terenie zabudowanym: maxspeed=50+maxspeed:conditional=60 @ (23:00-05:00)+source:maxspeed=PL:urban
Asteliks (2019-08-29 19:28:19+00:00): niby zrobiłem ale na wszelki wypadek dałem do zatwierdzenia przez kogoś innego