piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-05-28 18:24:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the museum information, but not the gnis tags (with the same information)? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112979206
Baloo Uriza (2019-05-29 12:09:58+00:00): This ramp has a posted speed limit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70706545
Derbo86 (2019-05-29 13:28:31+00:00): I am updating based on what our field personnel tell us.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-05-28 21:48:31+00:00): Hi,

Why have you added a recreation ground over the roads here? Did you intend to tag it as something else?
g0thmog (2019-05-28 21:51:41+00:00): Not finished updating by we have a group that walks and runs the whole neighborhood
WoodWoseWulf (2019-05-28 22:08:06+00:00): That doesn't really fit the definition for recreation ground:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground

"An open green space for general recreation, which often includes formal or informal pitches, nets and so on."

You could walk or run along pretty much any street in pretty much any suburban subdivision - it doesn't make them a recreation ground. If I was to turn up to Kingland Drive on any given day, it would probably just look like any other street.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
Geogast (2019-07-25 22:12:49+00:00): Olá, danctc! Neste e em outros changesets você desenhou muitos quilômetros de faixas exclusivas de ônibus como vias separadas. Faixas só se desenham como vias separadas se tiverem uma *separação física* das demais faixas. Não é o caso da Av. Senador Teotônio Vilela ou da Av. Atlântica. têm três faixas, uma para ônibus (psv) e duas para carros. Hoje andei por ai. A única separação é uma linha branca. E olha só que a existência da faixa exclusiva ja estava inserida, a saber nos tags das Avenidas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252552334; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191731087. Agora até tem redundância nos dados. Grato, Daniel
Baloo Uriza (2019-05-29 12:10:16+00:00): Do these ramps have a posted speed limit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70706717
Derbo86 (2019-05-29 13:29:16+00:00): I am updating based on what our field personnel tell us.
eggie (2019-05-28 18:36:36+00:00): Zolang het naar wens rendert op alle kaarten heb je het goed gedaan. :)
De Validator van JOSM keurt het goed.
Gr eggie
Baloo Uriza (2019-05-29 12:09:11+00:00): be sure to remove or update source:maxspeed as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70706827
Derbo86 (2019-05-29 13:29:43+00:00): Sorry missed that. Thank you I will keep an eye out for it.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-31 20:21:49+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70713319
user_1470980 (2019-06-01 16:49:47+00:00): Danke für den aktuellen Hinweis, sowie für Deine jeweils sehr wertvollen Auswertungen.
olehz (2019-05-30 09:33:44+00:00): якого ще "Колобка"? є ж офіційний перелік вулиць. якщо місцеві то Колобком називають, то додай то в alt_name
cserpell (2019-05-28 22:36:43+00:00): Estimado, gracias por la corrección. Volví al estado en que lo dejé, pues el problema está en el validador del editor que estás usando, lo cual ya fue corregido y pronto ya no se reportará como error: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5924 .

Cuando hay intersecciones entre estructuras que están en pisos diferentes, basta la etiqueta layer para decir cuál va encima o abajo de otra. Esto es muy usado en cursos de agua y puentes, o túneles, o en este caso, techos.
stephankn (2021-05-17 18:07:55+00:00): way 330169648
name=ซอย ซ้างวัด is wrong. has to be name=ซอย ข้างวัด. Please check your other spellings as well
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 19:17:04+00:00): Hi :)

Ist zwar schon ne Weile her, aber ich frag dich hier in dem CS, wo du es angelegt hast:
Du hast in Bestwig den DiSo-Sauerlandring quasi doppelt angelegt (ein node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6506949184/history)
Da die Website aktuell nicht aktiv ist würd mich interessieren, ob die Doppelerfassung auch heute noch passend ist? 

Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2025-05-11 15:38:42+00:00): Hast du mal Zeit gehabt über meine Frage nachzudenken?
palimpadum (2025-05-17 10:48:54+00:00): Doppelerfassung ist natürlich, habe ich gelöscht. Vermutlich ist der Laden gar nicht mehr vorhanden. Bin momentan krank. Ich schaue irgenwann mal dort vorbei.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-17 11:37:03+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung und gute Besserung
mavl (2019-12-08 11:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78101903, 78106642, 78104078 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70933401].
eggie (2019-05-28 19:21:33+00:00): Ziet er netjes uit.. Wanneer je wilt doorzetten met OSM kun je het beste overstappen naar editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Je hebt dan veel meer mogelijkheden zoals de BGT omtrekgericht als achtergrond. Je kunt dan precies op de transparant zien hoe de wegen en paden echt lopen.
Editor iD is toch wel beperkt.
Ook het maken van die multipolygonen is dan een eitje. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-05-28 19:24:26+00:00): Hier https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70709075 zie je dat ik mbv de BGT omtrekgericht nog iets heb aangepast.
mavl (2019-12-08 11:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78101903, 78106642, 78104078 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70933401].
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-28 19:35:54+00:00): Hi interdite,
in this CS you intentionally deleted a large farmland landuse relation, without any refinements or caring for the relation members. You caused extra work for other mappers to restore it.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-06-06 22:04:23+00:00): Further to my comments on your other changesets in Toronto: additionally, your moving around of POI nodes on Queen at John like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5712229921/history breaks our local convention of putting amenities which are on upper floors further away from the street to visually indicate where they are. Please don't go into reasonably well mapped areas and rearrange them.
jpennycook (2019-05-29 22:34:54+00:00): Hello.

A large number of these appear to be temporary beer festivals rather than permanent bars.  Unless the beer festival is actually going on now, it's probably not appropriate to add them as permanent items on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6506990285 sounds like it should be tagged as a brewery (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brewery), and some of the other permanent items might be better tagged as pubs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub)
TravGW (2019-05-29 03:53:10+00:00): Не делайте фиктивных правок, чтобы обмануть Pokemon Go.

Do not make fictitious edits to cheat Pokemon Go.
AndresDuhour (2019-05-31 03:09:56+00:00): Falta el tipo de objeto en varios nodos, otros ya están en el mapa. Es necesario revisar las ediciones.
FvGordon (2019-05-31 07:02:47+00:00): Kurz vor Plötz liegen die Straßen 'Plötzer Chaussee' und 'Alte Welt' aufeinander (doppelt eingetragene Straße mit unterschiedlichen Namen). Wo wechselt der Straßenname?
PhilipS85 (2019-05-31 15:03:02+00:00): Hab den Bereich erneut bearbeitet. Jetzt sind keine doppelten Straßen mehr eingezeichnet.
Plötzer Chaussee geht bis zum Ortsschild, dann beginnt "Neue Welt".
aceman444 (2020-03-29 18:19:33+00:00): Hi, please do not shift buildings with source=kapor2. Those are mostly placed correctly (with some exceptions) as they are imported from the cadastre database of Slovakia. So unless you have a much better GPS device than the state office, or a much better imagery, it is better when you align your imagery layer to them, not the other way round. Also Bing isn't very detailed and up to date at this place (we have much better images available in Slovakia). Also the iD editor does not look like suited for precision placement, as far as I have seen.
stephankn (2021-05-17 17:59:26+00:00): you seemed to have mis-spelled soi quite frequently. I am fixing at least some of them. Please double-check other characters as well for spelling mistakes. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72796
abrensch (2019-06-03 20:38:47+00:00): Was hast Du denn hier angestellt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6507083443
Kiekin (2019-06-04 06:07:55+00:00): Repariert.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-21 13:47:42+00:00): Hello jocarvajal,
I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from a fews years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6507141375 here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2023-05-21 13:48:16+00:00): Hola jocarvajal,
Espero que no te moleste que pregunte sobre una edición de hace unos años. En este conjunto de cambios, agregó una etiqueta "source=Google" en https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6507141375 aquí. En realidad, no podemos usar eso como fuente en OSM porque la licencia de Google no permite que se use aquí; causaría problemas reales para el proyecto si se descubriera que estamos usando Google Maps como fuente.
Si está en algún lugar con el que está familiarizado, entonces "source=local_knowledge" estaría perfectamente bien.

Atentamente
Andy Townsend, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM
PT-53 (2019-06-03 07:15:12+00:00): Hallo  kutsche16,
Du hast in diesem Äbderungssatz dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24244450/history für den Verkehr freigegeben.
Dann müßte doch auch dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24244451/history fertig gestellt sein?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
hee243898 (2022-03-01 08:53:10+00:00): Nordea doesn't seem to exist in this location anymore, unless it's an ATM?
PT-53 (2019-06-03 07:27:03+00:00): Hallo kutsche16,
Du hast diese Straße 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23214184/history mit Deiner Änderung auf higway=constrution zur Baustelle gemacht, diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192466546/history aber nicht gesperrt.
Das paßt so nicht zusammen.
Was wird dort genau gemacht und wie lange dauert diese Maßnahme?
Wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-09 07:20:02+00:00): Hallo kutsche16, 
die fehlende Sperrung hat Du ja eränzt.
Es wäre schön, wenn Du auch nocht antworten würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-19 04:58:23+00:00): Hallo kutsche16, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-30 04:10:38+00:00): Keine Antwort, Schade.
PT-53 (2019-07-07 06:37:12+00:00): Hallo kutsche16, 
Sperrung mit highway=construction am 28.05.2019 eingetragen und am 11.06.2019 wieder gelöscht.
Bitte für solche kurze Sperrungen künftig  	temporary:*=* @ (time range)  verwenden.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)
Grüße
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-05-29 00:03:37+00:00): Привет, названия нужно ставить с начала на молдавском в "name =", а потом на русском в "name:ru =".
Harald Hartmann (2019-05-29 13:56:59+00:00): Hmm, "Korrekturen an Waldgrenze" und dann "landuse=reservoir" in "natural=water, water=reservoir" geändert ... wieso? Bzw. besser, warum hast du "landuse=reservoir" entfernt?
Mammi71 (2019-05-29 20:21:42+00:00): Hallo Harald,
mit der Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes war ich wohl schlicht zu vorschnell mit dem speichern (Text war noch vorbelegt von der vorherigen Änderung) - sorry.
Änderung landuse in water: weil wiki-de:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir
dass im wiki-en seit Jahren eine Diskussion hin und her wogt und der status  abwechselnd depricated und in use gesetzt wird habe ich jetzt erst gelesen. Obwohl hieran auch deutschsprachige Mapper beteiligt waren, haben sie wohl das deutsche wiki vergessen. Und ich kann nicht zu jedem tag immer zusätzlich das englische Wiki und die komplette Versionsgeschichte durchforsten.
Nach Annahme des proposels mit deutlicher Mehrheit vor mittlerweile 8 Jahren sollte auch mal gut sein.
free_as_a_bird (2019-05-30 19:58:59+00:00): Watch out, WTF did you do here?? You replaced the name of an major German city with it's Latin name. Please be more careful!!!

Anyways, somebody already corrected your mistake, so no action needed at the moment
patervatebre (2019-06-04 11:09:34+00:00): This changeset also replaced the name of Seoul with the Latin name, fixed now.
MacLondon (2019-07-09 23:20:47+00:00): Hi. You added "status=proposed" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9131355 last month, but the correct tag is "state=proposed" (if this route is a proposed route.)
literan (2019-05-29 11:17:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Так там и стоит crossing=unmarked. По ПДД можно переходить по продолжению тротуаров, даже если не обозначен переход. Этот тег как раз для таких случаев.
neo-plan (2019-05-29 13:47:13+00:00): Но не на регулируемом перекрёстке, где сделаны пешеходные переходы со светофорами. Эти тротуары остались ещё со времён, когда там светофора и эстакады не было...
literan (2019-05-29 14:28:00+00:00): п. 4.3 ПДД: "Пешеходы должны переходить дорогу по пешеходным переходам, в том числе по подземным и надземным, а при их отсутствии - __на перекрестках по линии тротуаров или обочин__." 

Полагаете, нужно сделать крюк через все три имеющиеся регулируемых перехода?
neo-plan (2019-05-29 14:35:56+00:00): Ключевое слово ПРИ ИХ ОТСУТСТВИИ! А здесь переходы обозначены и идти как вздумается нельзя! Машины с Б. Косинской, едущие прямо на Суздальскую и направо на Старостина не обязаны пропускать пешеходов в этом месте.
kapazao (2019-05-29 09:51:46+00:00): Hola, ¿Por qué has establecido estas calles peatonales como privadas, existe alguna señalización que indique que lo son?
En imágenes a pie de calle tan solo he visto que se permite el acceso a cocheras para vehículos, poco más.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70712582
jpennycook (2019-05-29 22:36:37+00:00): The Bree Louise closed last year.
trigpoint (2019-05-30 16:27:24+00:00): Also Hoppers Bar, according to existing tags closed 5 years ago.
What sources are you using?
MW Eng (2019-05-31 17:51:42+00:00): I know Hoopers Bar, Bree Louise are closed I'm just adding them to my map so I know what pubs I've been to over thwe the years, I've got no idear how they are appearing on here
trigpoint (2019-05-31 19:04:15+00:00): Hi, thank you for your response.
When you add to the map, that means the actual map i.e. Openstreetmap, which is then shared and can then confuse and mislead other map users. If you want to store private information then you should use the bookmark function.
HTH Phil

ps I will revert this edit.
MW Eng (2019-05-31 21:25:40+00:00): That's what I've been doing I've been adding them as bookmarks, but if the place is not there any more, I'm having to add a place to the map first before I can bookmark it, which I asume is how they are been added to Open street maps. So the question is how do I bookmark a place that doesn't exist any more without adding it to open street maps
trigpoint (2019-05-31 21:46:45+00:00): You can just click on the map and add bookmark. There is no need to add it to the map. Just click edit bookmark to give it a meaningful name.
HTH Phil
jambamkin (2020-12-26 17:35:01+00:00): Hello DGJaguar, in this changeset you tagged way/211922297 as 'name=Bishop Morley's College (endowned). What does endowned mean?
DGJaguar (2020-12-26 17:44:37+00:00): Hi jambamkin. It was already there when I edited it - I've no idea what enowned means here. Perhaps it would be best to remove it.
DemoLogin (2019-06-10 21:10:31+00:00): Свяазанная заметка https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1728081
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-31 20:21:36+00:00): This is also a revert of your imported data?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70707030

#Revert
#Import
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
user_1470980 (2019-06-01 16:49:33+00:00): Danke für den aktuellen Hinweis, sowie für Deine jeweils sehr wertvollen Auswertungen.
Alecs01 (2019-06-01 08:03:08+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. By conventions, we use initial capital letter for street names (Via instead of via).
Giskard Reventlov (2019-06-01 08:07:24+00:00): Thank you for the remark.
In the next days I will add some more missing street names in my neighborhood, with the correct capital letters.

Roberto
SomeoneElse (2019-12-30 16:03:31+00:00): Can you check that the wikidata Q190464 on the HSBC in here is actually correct (i.e. the object is not a retail bank)?
Best Regards,
Andy
Glassman (2019-05-29 02:09:43+00:00): Tip: we normally try to not delete features that just need improving. That keeps the history of the feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70714940
Glassman (2019-05-29 02:13:13+00:00): I removed the tag man_made=mast from the power pole. A mast is a different type of object, like the communications towers you mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70715206
user_5359 (2022-04-06 09:30:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/693124276/history. What is the meaning of the tag streetlight = yes? Did you mean lit=yes?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-04-06 22:17:57+00:00): Yes, thank you, fixed
derFred (2020-03-09 21:46:44+00:00): Hi Roberto ... who told you that at that location is "Cascada Hola Vida"? ... I travelled more than 100 km ... could find Hola Vida more in the north!
derFred (2020-03-09 23:25:03+00:00): and it is still in OSM
Allison P (2019-05-31 06:35:16+00:00): Looks pretty good! When adding names to roads, make sure not to abbreviate the direction or the suffix (always spell them out). Also, features without tags won't appear on the map, consider adding tags to features like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6507430380. If you're not sure which tags to use, take a look at the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org. I hope this helps!
ProffessorQD (2019-05-31 15:39:51+00:00): Thank you so much! It definitely helps! I'm gonna go make those edits really quick.
Claudius Henrichs (2019-06-03 10:01:47+00:00): Hi Michael,
It seems you somehow accodentially deleted the stop positions for the Expo line metro at Gateway stations. I've since added them back. Maybe you were confused because there are multiple station icons showing in your editor, but actually each metro station consists of a station node and stop positions on the actual track where the trains stop.
MichaelIOGD (2019-06-06 22:28:43+00:00): Hi Claudius,
Thank you so much for correcting me! I didn't realize that. I just assumed someone had marked the location twice. I appreciate you letting me know about my mistake and will avoid making the same mistake in future.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:59:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mbethke (2019-05-29 09:32:52+00:00): Hi,
good start in OSM thanks for your additions! :)
Two notes though: please make sure to actually connect ways to each other, otherwise routing won't work. I just fixed it for the two service ways near the ministry of finance. Also, I deleted your new motorways on top of 23 Singha Road and some others. As long as bicycles and pedestrians are allowed there, it's not a motorway. No worries, mistakes happen :)

cheers,
Matthias
Frans S (2019-05-29 14:01:49+00:00): Hi, See my PM earlier today
on this page you will see your mappings of a few buildings, and after adjusting by me
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70734600
when your mappings will look like these,  you are on the good way. Best regards and keep mapping
Joseph E (2019-06-09 12:35:27+00:00): Terima kasih, saya senang sekali bahwa Anda sedang menambah banyak gedung-gendung ke database Openstreetmap.

Saya ada satu usulan. Bisanya "name=" dipakai untuk nama yang dipakai pada umumnya. Kelihatanya bahwa Anda sedang menambah banyak gedung dengan nama "name=A", "name=B", "name=C" dan lain-lain. Mungkin ini bukan nama.

English:
Thank you for all your contributions to Openstreetmap. I really appreciate how man buildings you have been adding to the database. 

I do have a suggestion. The field "name=*" should be used for the common name of a feature, only. Most buildings do not have names. I see you've added many buildings with "name=A", "name=B" etc - these aren't the locally used names. Perhaps you could use a different tag for these?

Sincerely,
Joseph Eisenberg,
in Wamena, Papua Province
aharvey (2019-05-29 11:38:01+00:00): Thanks for adding the name. Does this street specifically forbid horses?
Anshu P (2019-05-29 23:37:33+00:00): Horses?
Anshu P (2019-05-29 23:55:06+00:00): Ah, I see what you meant. Fixed.
Mazda05 (2019-05-29 08:08:18+00:00): напоминаю вам, что тег addr:city не требуется на зданиях, которые расположены внутри полигона населённого пункта
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:24:54+00:00): rückgängig gemacht in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154912
jpennycook (2019-05-29 22:39:48+00:00): According to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/28231121/history, "Stones" was the old name for "The Spitfire".
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:21:55+00:00): rückgängig gemacht in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154816
mmahmud (2019-06-10 15:35:11+00:00): Hi, none of the images show that the Unclassified road goes though the stream and grass land. Any idea why it is drawn that way? There also is an ID to it.
JDoesMaps (2019-06-11 09:18:09+00:00): Hi,The road was added in 2009, before Bing or other imagery was available to mappers, so I’m guessing it was imported or digitized with low resolution imagery. I’ve improved the whole area with newer imagery. Thanks for checking!
mmahmud (2019-06-11 09:26:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for clearing that up. Happy mapping!
aharvey (2019-05-29 11:36:26+00:00): +1 if these addresses aren't surveable on the ground, then we don't need them in OSM.
aixbrick (2019-05-29 10:05:32+00:00): Hallo,
rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70727240. Das Kohlibri schließt erst Ende Juni und die Zeit sollten wir ihm auch in OSM noch geben :-).
Gruß
Peer van Daalen (2019-05-29 18:42:56+00:00): Oh, - stimmt! Da hab ich vorschnell was verwechselt. Nur was? 
Ich krieg´s raus ... ;-)!
jonsger (2019-05-29 07:10:54+00:00): Hast du das Luftbild mit einer Drohne aufgenommen?
gsperb (2019-05-30 07:14:03+00:00): Nö, mit einer Cessna
jonsger (2019-05-30 07:40:18+00:00): Cool :) D.h. wenn ich mal wo ein aktuelleres Luftbild haben will, meld ich mich einfach bei dir :P
Constable (2019-05-31 09:57:42+00:00): hi, this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1796710 seems to be about your edits, could you please have a look?
thanks
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:18:43+00:00): zurückgesetzt in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154730
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:15:46+00:00): zurückgesetzt in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154631
eggie (2019-05-29 07:26:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-05-29 07:29:27+00:00): Dag Mark Begin in principe nooit met access=no  Dat is een totaal verbod. Wanneer tweewielers als moped, mofa en bicycle hier niet mogen rijden tag alleen vehicle=no
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-29 07:31:00+00:00): path is inderdaad beter. footway alleen bij het bord met de wandelaar met kind.
Nu de access=no nog weg.
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:12:33+00:00): zurückgesetzt siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154532