piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aTarom (2022-04-15 09:37:08+00:00): Hallo felixi, can you check this, please?
In the relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11815206
of this changeset
figure as role of the way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865509329
the text:
"i Resumen del pedido Subtotal de producto(s):EUR 37,56 Envío:EUR 0,00 Total antes de impuestos:EUR 37,56 Impuestos:EUR 7,89 Total:EUR 45,45 Importe total:EUR 45,45 Total de reembolsoEUR 39,95) "
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
tastrax (2020-11-10 01:13:20+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Wozzagonebush (2020-11-10 01:25:41+00:00): Noted :)
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
phidauex (2020-11-24 19:41:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding a lot of metadata on power plants in HI, however, the import seems to have caused some issues, too. Please inspect your additions and do a little clean-up, in particular there are plants added that aren't actually in operation yet, some untagged lines, and some plant names that might be incomplete. I'll try to fix a few, but you may want to look over the whole dataset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93317464
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Ewen Hill (2022-02-17 11:18:56+00:00): Hi Gregory. I travelled the Great Ocean route walk recently and I couldn't see how to access the shelter at all. Do you  know more as there were tracks at all - See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=319721030209808&focus=map&lat=-38.7905212905951&lng=143.6139913661516&z=17 - All the best from from D13
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Warin61 (2020-11-01 10:12:21+00:00): Hi,

Lake Eppalock looks to occupy a much larger area than you have mapped. See the Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta.
VictorIE (2020-11-01 22:52:33+00:00): Hi,

I'm just wondering what your basis for selecting place nodes is.

admin_level=8 represents subdivisions of counties that are used for electoral constituencies and council area committee purposes. They have no 'capital city' equivalent. Their administrative centres are likely the county towns, not somewhere within each of the admin_level=8 areas.
ZeLonewolf (2020-11-01 23:02:40+00:00): I attached the place nodes that had the same name as the surrounding boundary, ignoring subdivisions that didn't have a place node with a matching name.  If that was not a correct assumption, my apologies and this changeset can easily be reverted.
itineris (2020-11-01 08:42:27+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves, figyelj oda egy kicsit jobban! Most Baja mellett javítottam egy önmetsző poligonod. (Nem multi, sima.)
És "Baja 201020" megjegyzéssel egészen Egerig terjednek a változásaid. Lehetne kisebb adagokban felküldeni, és akkor valamivel relevánsabb lehetne a leírás.

Üdv:
Ákos
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-14 16:40:22+00:00): Jesteś pewien tych przepustów? Ja się nigdy nie odważyłem ich mapować z LIDARa ale może jest to w miarę pewne. Jak odróżniasz przepusty od mostków?
B_KSL (2023-01-15 01:46:05+00:00): Nie jestem pewny. Więcej - mam świadomość, że pewnej części nie zgaduję prawidłowo i sam po sobie już nie raz poprawiałem. Na zdjęciach z LIDARa tam gdzie przepust jest ciągła nawierzchnia drogi, tam gdzie mostek - z reguły przerwa, nawierzchnia przerwana na obu końcach. Na pewnych drogach mostki nie są prawdopodobne - chociaż to tylko na wyczucie. Pomijam, że mały mostek i pewien rodzaj przepustu to często  kwestia do dyskusji. W obu przypadkach da się przejść/przejechać "na sucho" i oba te oznaczenia niosą taką informację. Większy dla mnie problem odróżnić przepust od brodu, szczególnie na kiepskich leśnych drogach i bardzo małych ciekach. W praktyce nie ma to większego znaczenia bo takie da się po prostu przekroczyć ale robiąc w takim przypadku błąd, zasadniczo zmieniam informację o ew. mokrej przeszkodzie. Pozostaje pytanie czy korzystniej jest błędnie odczytać kilka procent takich brodów bądź przepustów czy np. pozwolić nawigacji odgadywać takie nieoznaczone przecięcia w 100% lub by ich w ogóle nie uwzględniała. Dla obu metod znajdziemy argumenty za i przeciw. W bardzo niepewnych a istotnych miejscach można by rozważyć jakieś fixme albo coś podobnego, może kiedyś ktoś się zlituje.  Jeśli Cię takie niepewne przecięcia bardzo rażą to usuwaj według uznania bądź daj znać a sam wytnę. Nie musi być tak jak ja uznałem za właściwe.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-19 10:35:49+00:00): Pytałem się przede wszystkim bo tam uwagi wiszą - to w takim razie na razie zostawię i dane i uwagi i mam nadzieję że wkrótce odwiedze to miejsce bo ładnie tam jest
Warin61 (2020-11-01 10:00:14+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM..

Water tanks used for fire fighting are somewhat larger than a few yards in diameter. The tank - way 865531540 - would at best be used for gardening... probably only = 100 litres. For fire fighting as a minimum 5,000 litres would be a better idea.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:37:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=down2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426255526/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=down
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Frans S (2020-10-31 15:14:58+00:00): Hello.
Please stop mapping other features than Buildings and highways. 
These are the goals of this project.
Land features don't need to be mapped on the Taskmanager HOTOSM projects
You then just map 1 task.
Best regards
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:18:12+00:00): Hi there, I think you might've got capacity and capacity:disabled the wrong way round on the parking lot.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Frans S (2020-11-16 14:18:09+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
Please tag buildings just as building=yes
always square rectangular buildings with the Q key
Best regards
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:24:37+00:00): Hi there, generally with slip lanes it's best to start the new way from where there is physical separation, e.g. not following next to the roadway until it becomes physical separation, for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-34.02577/150.72660

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
osmviborg (2020-10-31 06:24:42+00:00): Hvordan afgør du områdets størrelse? "Bays are frequently mapped as nodes, and rarely as areas".
b-holdet (2020-10-31 08:03:52+00:00): Jeg bruger SDFE 25 kortet som udgangspunkt
En bugt har altid to pynter og mellem dem ligger bugten. Det er så her jeg ser på SDFE 25 kortet for at se hvor stort område der er tale om og bruger derfor de yderste pynter som bredden af området.
Hjart (2020-10-31 15:03:22+00:00): Vi har mapped mange bugter og fjorde mm som områder. Det fungerer for mig at se ganske udmærket.
osmviborg (2020-10-31 15:34:22+00:00): "Problemet" er udbredelsen/størrelsen. Den er ofte hjemmelavet. Derfor vil et punkt ofte, i min verden, være en bedre løsning. Prøv at sammenligne Aalborg Bugt i OSM, med samme i stednavneregisteret. Her staves det med 'Å'.
Hjart (2020-10-31 15:42:03+00:00): Hvis det er stavemåden du er utilfreds er du for min skyld velkommen til at ændre den. Jeg foretrækker også "å" fremfor "Aa".
Hjart (2020-10-31 15:48:11+00:00): Og med hensyn til "udbredelsen" behøver det ikke altid være "perfekt" for at være godt nok. Størrelsen på en sø eller fjord eller mose f.eks. lader sig alligevel ikke fastlægge med milimeters præcision, medmindre man har sat betonvægge op omkring området.
osmviborg (2020-10-31 15:55:37+00:00): Jeg brugte gåseøjne at nedtone "problemet". Det er ikke væsentligt. Men der er stor forskel på områdets størrelse, afhængig af hvor du lavet opslaget.
Hjart (2020-10-31 16:19:20+00:00): At mappe fjorde mm som områder kan faktisk være nyttigt. Se f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8320422 hvor jeg personligt brugte en del tid på at undersøge hvad definitionen egentlig er. I det tilfælde kan man ikke illustrere det med kun et punkt.
osmviborg (2020-10-31 18:06:34+00:00): Aalborg Bugt. OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9045610
SDFE: https://imgur.com/a/CUSL4p9
Der er nogen forskel.
b-holdet (2020-10-31 20:29:51+00:00): Jeg må lige spørge til Imgur.
Hvor har Imgur sit billede fra?
Her er et andet sted med samme område over Ålborg bugt
https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/sites/DK00FX122
b-holdet (2020-10-31 20:31:15+00:00): Ok, det er vist taget fra OSM. My bad :)
Hjart (2020-10-31 20:43:07+00:00): Nu er der jo ikke noget i vejen at justere omfanget på arealer efterhånden, som vi bliver "klogere" på eventuelle alment anerkendte definitioner på dem. At der er forskel på polygonerne i forskellige værker er ikke i sig selv grund til en regression til simple punkter.
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:32:58+00:00): Hi there, the name tag on buildings generally isn't needed for petrol station roofs, generally all the name information goes on the petrol station node/area. Also, the petrol station information (amenity=fuel) needs to be on only one object - either the area outline that you added or the main building. It can't be on both otherwise its technically duplicating the same feature.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:34:24+00:00): Hi there, the objects you tagged as wastewater plants are probably better tagged as storage tanks -- there is a preset for "water tank" within iD.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Warin61 (2020-11-12 02:49:33+00:00): Hi,

 Errors in relation 11815440

1) Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments!

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6

2) building=yes;house ... no. It is either a house or not. 

Suggest separating the building or using building:part=*.
radiotrefoil (2020-11-12 02:54:40+00:00): thanks for picking up on that, will fix
radiotrefoil (2020-11-12 03:00:13+00:00): By the way, if you're wondering where these outer way relation errors and that bad tag "building=yes;house" are coming from, they are artifacts of combining areas in iD using the C shortcut. I will be more careful using that in future. Cheers
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:25+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:46:07+00:00): Handled in message
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:38:52+00:00): Hi there, generally adding a name to a feature isn't necessary unless its specifically signposted as a name. For instance, the name "Cricket net" isn't necessary as the fact that it is an area for cricket is implied by the tags: leisure=pitch and sport=cricket.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:42:39+00:00): Hi there, generally unless a name is signposted for a road it's unnecessary, e.g. the service road. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
literan (2020-12-18 13:03:41+00:00): Вы сломали этой правкой большой мультиполигон леса, зачем-то включили полигон нас. пункта в мульттик, создав самопересечение его членов
literan (2020-12-18 13:04:26+00:00): починил. будьте внимательнее
Frans S (2020-11-02 16:11:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

Please let nodes of buildings connect to each other. This makes it difficult to adjust mappings. 
success with mapping
gmckone (2020-11-03 02:56:34+00:00): I understood that osm preferred that adjacent objects not be connected at nodes. I’m now attempting to map without connecting nodes. 
@fran_s please clarify
Frans S (2020-11-03 09:58:52+00:00): Hello
You are right. Just connect objects to each other when you are sure they share separating walls. See blocks of flats or terraced buildings.
In general it is recommended to map buildings not connected to each other or other objects.
Best regards
gmckone (2020-11-03 14:49:53+00:00): Thank you Fran I’ve got it.  if they share a wall then we connect the nodes
PJ1342 (2020-10-31 07:33:53+00:00): Few errors fixed in changeset 93325181
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93324913
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:45:53+00:00): Hi there, generally its best to preserve the history of objects in the map e.g. resize and re-circularise a roundabout instead of deleting the roundabout and redrawing.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Carto'Cité (2020-11-13 11:36:39+00:00): Bonjour.
Il semble qu'il y ait une petite coquille dans le coin nord de la place (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865576004) : elle est reliée au bâtiment et à la borne incendie. 
Aussi tu as supprimé une place pour en créer une nouvelle. Or la bonne pratique veut qu'on modifie les objets plutôt que les remplacer, afin de conserver leur historique.
Je te laisse corriger le coin nord (je peux aussi m'en charger sans problème) ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
Frans S (2020-11-05 11:31:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
Please map buildings more accurate by following the outlines precisely,
Also move tall buildings to their groundplan

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
erenozdemir (2020-11-05 11:41:28+00:00): Hello.Thank you for feedback. Actually, I pay attention to the roof and offset setting. There was a conflict with someone else here. I forgot while I was fixing it. :) But thank you very much again.
Eren.
Safaamo (2020-11-06 00:24:14+00:00): 
لماذا لا يتم تحميل الخرائط على الاجهزة الذكية
حيث تكون الخرائط خرائط بدون نت
Safaamo (2020-11-06 00:27:44+00:00): لماذا لا يتم تحميل الخرائط على الاجهزة الذكية
حيث تكون الخرائط خرائط بدون نت
Safaamo (2020-11-06 00:28:02+00:00): لماذا لا يتم تحميل الخرائط على الاجهزة الذكية
حيث تكون الخرائط خرائط بدون نت
Safaamo (2020-11-06 00:28:10+00:00): لماذا لا يتم تحميل الخرائط على الاجهزة الذكية
حيث تكون الخرائط خرائط بدون نت
wille (2020-11-03 20:34:11+00:00): kcalik, I'm one of the developers of Tasking Manager. I noticed that on this changeset you traced new buildings over some that already existed and I would like to understand a bit more about what you was trying to do, in order to discover how we can improve Tasking Manager.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93325552
kcalik (2020-11-09 20:01:33+00:00): the system is not showed me to who traced before me, so i didnt know they have been already marked
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93325552
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:48:06+00:00): Hi there, I've changed the speed cameras back to traffic lights where the tags were moved to highway_1.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:29:03+00:00): Hi there, with speed cameras, you only need a single node at the location of the device (e.g. not connected to the way), and then the roadways that the speed camera takes readings can be marked with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement

If you need help setting this up then let me know.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
marczoutendijk (2022-01-27 09:22:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865581263/history
Hi,
You gave access=family on a parking space. Shouldn't access=private be a better fit?
Marc.
seav (2020-10-31 08:11:52+00:00): Oops. Changest comment should be: "[Alabang] CBTL is now open".
ACarlotti (2020-11-01 14:51:23+00:00): Do you know whether Princes Street or Princess Street is correct? I'd be surprised if it's both, but I don't know which it is.
__martin__ (2020-11-08 07:06:20+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, adding "name" to distance posts will hide their no. It is better to display the no. instead of the trail name.
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:22:16+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Kovoschiz (2020-11-10 10:54:38+00:00): Handled in message
Kovoschiz (2020-11-10 10:55:30+00:00): @__martin__ Many renders show `ref=` after the name in brackets.
Roef (2020-12-04 12:03:24+00:00): Bestaat 45-54 wel? Deze ligt namelijk over 19-54 heen. Knooppunt net geeft nu een melding over knooppunt 54 (https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/node/5721285579), dat er 4 routes naar toe lopen terwijl er maar 3 verwacht worden.

Groet,
Roef
Geim (2020-12-05 10:49:41+00:00): Nee, bestaat niet (meer). Ik heb hem verwijderd. Bedankt!
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:38+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:46:10+00:00): Handled in message
nevw (2020-10-31 13:14:42+00:00): Hi
I expect emergency=water_tank is not correct tagging.
I think these are more suitable tags...
building=yes
man_made=storage_tank
content=water
or if it is a swimming pool...
leisure=swimming_pool
nevw (2020-11-02 10:34:03+00:00): tags fixed on water tanks
frosm (2020-11-04 23:45:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour le correctif et bonne continuation
nevw (2020-10-31 13:05:45+00:00): Hi 
welcome to the osm. 
I notice in your mapping of the small waterbodies on the farmland that would typically be referred to by the land owners as farm dams that the tagging needs improvement.
The correct tags to use would be ... 
natural=water + water=reservoir , intermittent=yes|no if known.
There is no need to tag with area=yes or to add a name.
nevw (2020-11-02 10:36:48+00:00): I re-tagged these
nevw (2020-11-02 10:39:23+00:00): Hi
I re-tagged these same as others
olo81 (2021-03-08 17:43:05+00:00): nazwa do poprawy, opisowa nazwa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219338994
C2oc4 (2021-03-09 09:39:50+00:00): poprawione
olo81 (2021-03-09 16:48:37+00:00): Przy dodawaniu sklepów, czy firm trzeba dodać jeszcze odpowiednie tagi które wskazują co to jest. Teraz wygląda jak by budynek nazywał się "kraw". W tym wypadku trzeba doda tag shop=appliance. Jeśli nie zajmuje całego budynku warto go wyciągnąć z budynku do punktu. 

Inne sklepy czy firmy analogicznie tagujemy według tego: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sklepy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:office
C2oc4 (2021-03-09 17:00:35+00:00): Aż takich informacji czy to jest cały budynek pod sklep czy tylko np parter niestety nie posiadam
Miguel Pedr (2020-11-01 19:09:28+00:00): Hola,
Las direcciones unidireccionales asignadas aquí son entradas muertas unidireccionales incorrectas, que es un sentido único falso y no se puede asignar la única vía al final de la carretera. Tenga cuidado de que un solo sentido afecte la ruta y asegúrese de que los unidireccionales no puedan ser callejones sin salida.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93328427
Taxila (2020-11-03 22:31:16+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for catching this! I have reviewed this area again and further improved the road connections.
Parzelle13 (2020-11-01 09:38:39+00:00): Wenn man schon Punkte von Wegen löscht und wieder neu hinzufügt, sollte man mal darauf achten, ob alle betroffenen Relation (hier gleich 5) anschließend noch i.O. sind.
stoni100 (2020-11-01 14:55:55+00:00): Hallo  Parzelle13, 

sorry, wenn ich was falsch gemacht habe. 

Wenn du mir gesagt hättest, welchen Way/Relation ich beschädigt habe und wie du das rausgefunden hast, könnte ich auch noch was lernen :-)

Grüße

Michael
Parzelle13 (2020-11-01 17:25:19+00:00): Hallo,
unter https://www.knooppuntnet.nl wurde die Knotenpunktroute 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1830743
zwischen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24387673 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11309721 als unterbrochen aufgelistet, weil die Reihenfolge der beiden Wegelemente der "Rosenthaler Straße" nicht mehr stimmte. 
Daraufhin habe ich auch alle anderen darüber führenden Relationen in JOSM überprüft und korrigiert.
Welche Relationen von deinem CS betroffen waren sieht man hier weiter unten unter "Relationen (5)".
Gruß
nevw (2020-10-31 23:41:37+00:00): Hi
I reverted this changeset due to duplicated waterway, incorrect tagging.
UNGSC-Jrachi (2020-10-31 15:09:53+00:00): Missing:
#UNSOS #UniteMaps #UNGSC
_PG_ (2020-12-07 16:33:06+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Могу я узнать, зачем вы плотину отметили как пешеходный маршрут? На карте хайкинговых маршрутов появился маршрут длиной 100 метров. Это какой-то задел для будущего маршрута или просто случайная техническая ошибка?
_PG_ (2020-12-07 16:33:36+00:00): На карте маршрутов это выглядит вот так:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11815794&map=13!56.3102!38.2037