piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
AMDmi3 (2016-05-26 10:04:45+00:00): улица Оганьяца - а точно не Оганьянца?

http://kladr-rf.ru/07/000/001/000/0247/
literan (2016-05-17 12:17:20+00:00): И зачем вместо названия цифру 4 поставили?
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Karim MalakootSat (2016-05-16 19:56:52+00:00): God's Love for the souls
aseerel4c26 (2016-05-16 19:19:44+00:00): gehört zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39357688
GerdP (2017-08-23 14:34:27+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=meadow
on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418673809
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418673790
I guess you meant landuse=meadow, but this really doesn't look like a meadow, so I think landcover=grass would be a better fit
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Diabolix (2016-05-16 19:30:38+00:00): Woops, comment should be "added missing path" instead
marczoutendijk (2016-05-17 16:47:06+00:00): Let op: een pool en dartscentrum is geen amenity maar valt onder leisure!
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
Pas je het zelf aan?
PT-53 (2016-05-17 09:07:04+00:00): Hallo Djammbo,
Du verwendest für Deine width-Angaben Kommas als Dezimmaltrenner. Das ist falsch.
Da in OSM englische Begriffe verwendet werden, wird als Dezimmaltrenner entspr. der Punkt verwendet.
Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:width
Ich habe die Kommas in Punkte geändert, soweit mit OSMOSE die Fehler angezeigt hat.
OSMOSE: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Osmose
Grüße
PT-53
PT-53 (2016-06-29 05:28:17+00:00): OSMI-Fehlermeldung islands für way 418682048. Mapper per PN informiert.
FTA (2016-05-16 22:40:36+00:00): Hi there! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed you happened to add two nodes--one with your business at the proper location and the second in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I went ahead and removed the latter one. Feel free to shout if you have any questions about the project. Happy Mapping! Ethan aka FTA
Velocimaptor (2016-05-16 19:50:02+00:00): These are actually edits in Managua, NI from KG Ground Survey 2016
Nakaner (2016-10-24 20:04:52+00:00): Diese Änderung ist leider falsch. Das sieht man mit Bing und den amtlichen 80cm-Bildern. Der Radweg führt durch eine Unterführung. In solchen Fällen verbindet man die Wege nicht. Ich habe es korrigiert.
SOSM (2017-04-25 17:36:18+00:00): Sorry, but map.geo.admin.ch is NOT a legal source of data for OSM. When you signed up for your OSM account you agreed to only using legit sources.
keujfl839237 (2017-04-25 18:16:11+00:00): Sorry, I was not aware that address information (from the Federal Register of Buildings and Housing) is protected by copyright. Is there a simple way to revert my edits?
keujfl839237 (2017-04-25 18:20:52+00:00): So it is only allowed to add addresses by own survey?
SOSM (2017-04-25 18:32:11+00:00): The GWR is not protected by copyright but far more by the specific law and ordinance that governs it use (copyright would likely apply to maps.geo.admin.ch in general). Note that the terms of use of maps.geo.admin.ch are clear about its contents not being open data.

We have access to address data in a number of cantons and in the city of Zürich (see http://sosm.ch/projects/swiss-open-addresses/ ), outside of those areas you need to survey addresses.

Can you identify the changesets in which you used GWR data without too much trouble?
keujfl839237 (2017-04-25 18:52:40+00:00): I could make a list but it may be easier to revert all my edits, if that is possible. I am sorry for my ignorance. I did not intent to violate copyright.
keujfl839237 (2017-04-25 18:55:11+00:00): Or I could remove the addresses manually.
SOSM (2017-04-25 19:01:52+00:00): We can likely simply revert the address additions, but lets see what the DWG says.

Note you are not the first nor likely the last to mistakenly use data that they shouldn't, please don't feel to bad about it.

The other annoying point is that the laws wrt use of the GWR were scheduled to change at the  beginning of this year, with bit of a hope that we would then be able to use the data, however that has been delayed.
keujfl839237 (2017-04-25 19:18:40+00:00): Here is a list of edits for which I used the Federal Register of Buildings and Housing or the city map of Bern: 33735714, 33736901, 33737124, 33737255, 33737434, 33737460, 33737508, 33737582, 33752228, 33752379, 33752808, 33753358, 33753528, 33753766, 33753927, 33754117, 33754408, 33754950, 33760350, 33760532, 33777921, 33778662, 33779624, 33779998, 34472217, 34472399, 34472788, 34472832, 34475345, 34475407, 34475516, 34475773, 34477131, 39334495, 39336719, 39337142, 39337341, 39347567, 39347673, 39348376, 39348574, 39350157, 39355649, 39356023, 39356430, 39356821, 39359093, 39362037, 39362125, 47916585, 47917014, 47917397, 47974878, 47983259, 47983344, 47984007, 47984124, 47984410, 48012605, 48014689, 48015226, 48037150, 48037216, 48037693, 48037760, 48038003, 48040379, 48041057, 48041160, 48041743, 48042232, 48063748, 48064154, 48064758, 48064948, 48081813, 48094562, 48094796, 48095455, 48096370. However I often made other changes (with Bing or own survey/knowledge as source) at the same time.
keujfl839237 (2017-04-28 10:21:39+00:00): The list above is not correct. Here is the correct list: 33735714, 33736459, 33736901, 33737124, 33737255, 33752228, 33752379, 33752808, 33753358, 33753528, 33753766, 33753927, 33754117, 33754408, 33754950, 33760350, 33760532, 33777921, 33778662, 33779624, 33779998, 34472217, 34472399, 34472788, 34472832, 34475345, 34475407, 34475516, 34475773, 34477131, 39334495, 39336719, 39337142, 39337341, 39347567, 39347673, 39348376, 39348574, 39350157, 39355649, 39356023, 39356430, 39356821, 39359093, 39362037, 39362125, 47916585, 47917014, 47917397, 47974878*, 47983259*, 47983344*, 47984007*, 47984124*, 47984410*, 48012605, 48014689, 48015226, 48037150, 48037216, 48037693, 48037760, 48038003, 48040379, 48041057, 48041160, 48041743, 48042232, 48063748, 48064758, 48064948, 48081813, 48088570, 48094562, 48094796, 48095455, 48096370

* Addresses from map.bern.ch/stadtplan. 'Quelle: Stadt Bern; Amtliche Vermessung; OpenStreetMap contributors'
keujfl839237 (2017-07-21 07:11:45+00:00): Has there been a reaction from DWG in the meantime?
datendelphin (2017-07-25 19:59:26+00:00): Yes there was, but they did not yet remove the data. There is another (larger) case still open which used the same source. I guess it will be done together.
keujfl839237 (2017-07-26 04:44:27+00:00): I've removed the addresses manually yesterday.
keujfl839237 (2018-05-15 14:43:48+00:00): Hi, when I deleted the addresses manually a year ago, I didn't know they are still in the database. Don't they still have to be permanently deleted? Please excuse my ignorance and impatience ...
SimonPoole (2018-05-15 14:53:54+00:00): In the mean time we have permission to use the GWR dataset so the discussion is moot.
Nakaner (2016-05-17 15:17:42+00:00): Hallo murxer010,

du hast in diesem und anderen Änderungssätze in den vergangen Wochen zahlreiche Campingplätze in ganz Deutschland eingetragen. Was ist denn die Quelle dieser Änderungen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
murxer010 (2016-05-17 21:00:05+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,

vorwiegend trage ich neue Wohnmobilstellplätze ein; Campingplätze sind praktisch alle schon
gemappt.

Teilweise habe ich die Plätze selbst besucht (bin Womofahrer).
Wenn ich von einem neuen Platz höre oder lese, schaue ich nach, ob er
auf der webpage des Anbieters (Kommune oder privat) beschrieben ist.
Wenn ja trage ich ihn ein. Wobei ich unterstelle, daß der Anbieter damit einverstanden ist.

Ich hoffe das ist so ok?

Viele Grüße,
Hans
Nakaner (2016-05-17 21:21:51+00:00): Hallo Hans,

wenn es so ist, wie du es geschildert hast, dann ist das in Ordnung.

Deine Beiträge haben halt den Verdacht erweckt, dass du eine Liste an Campingplätzen nach und nach in OSM einträgst. Bei OSM achten wir nämlich auch auf das Datenbank-Schutzrecht und legen es im Allgemeinen sehr streng aus. Daher betrachten wir z.B. auch die Webseiten von Filialketten als Datenbank.

Wir legen großen Wert auf "local knowledge", das heißt Beobachtungen vor Ort.

Hinweis: Es ist in vielen Fällen sinnvoll, einen Campingplatz als Fläche statt bloß als Punkt zu erfassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
literan (2016-05-17 12:26:52+00:00): Приветствую! рекомендую на дворовые проезды ставить тег living_street=yes (это общая практика, закрепленная в вики). Это показывает, что это дворовая территория и не дает навигаторам строить маршруты срезая через дворы.
literan (2016-05-17 12:28:31+00:00): P.S. Здорово мапите! Отрисовывал развязку у станции Ступино и сокрушался, что город один из самых непроработанных в Московской области, и вот - картинка прям на глазах меняется к лучшему :-)
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Bratananio (2016-05-17 06:12:14+00:00): Please do not erase the added forest again! It is definately there! (Although the forest is not comparable with forests in Europe.) The area is coveredwith trees.
lannigbour (2016-05-17 17:03:58+00:00): Ok Bratanio,  you are right. Some  specific places are designed  for agriculture (already drawn zones ) but  in  reality, they means nothing because every land  can be  cultivate (or  not ) if  rain comes.
Other thing : Morro de Vento  localisation is  wrong  (and  its  part  of road access). I can't  remove it and  adjust on the right  place (and  it's  access) Remember ,  i live  on  this  area. I  can  inform  about local realities.
Bratananio (2016-05-17 17:48:08+00:00): Hello lannigbour,
tell me please, whrere Morro de Vento is located? Then I can put it in.
Please be more precice by adding paths, etc. sometimes they are not added on the real path ( you can see the bing-map while mapping).
Sometimes there were double paths at the same track. I already corrected them.
The "spring" close to the "Casa Florestal". Where does the water last? Is it the beginning of a ribeira?
I'd be happy to get answers.
Bratananio
lannigbour (2016-05-17 18:09:35+00:00): "Gudo de Morro de Vento" is the right top. Erase the "Morro de vento on its North- East.
I correct the paths  as  they are  on  zone  (reallly, i  do use  them weekly),  with the Bing  map.  Double paths ?  i can't  see that.
The spring  is  what  we  call " a chafariz", place  for  locals  to  get drinkable water. It comes from a spring, very  close to it, created by  humans in the 80th, excavating   a narrow tunnel (galeria).
Water points are very  important here.  May  be we  should name them specifically ?
lannnigbour
Bratananio (2016-05-18 03:44:03+00:00): O.k. I am going to erase "Morro do Vento". But I did't find it, when I wanted to do it. I am going to try it a second time.
" Double paths ? i can't see that. " Of course, because I erased them for you.
I know all the 9 settled island well, especially Santo Antão, where I return every year for my social project. I am on the islands since 17 years!
So I know, what a "galeria" for water is!***
Please, be also more precise in writing ( capital letters at the beginning, etc.)
Let's improve the maps of these beautiful islands together!
Bratananio
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Seandebasti (2017-12-02 18:06:43+00:00): hey what does 191_299_170_R4C8 means
some road data dont align with recent satellite imagery like way 100386569
FTA (2016-05-18 02:22:25+00:00): Ugh, that's the node reference, not the changeset. Changeset was 39361554
highflyer74 (2016-05-19 14:11:03+00:00): Tach!

Mmmmh, mit blind:blindenfuehrhund kann glaube ich keine Software etwas anfangen. Ich würde da eher in Richtung blind:guide_dog o.ä. gehen, da die Datenbank ja weltweit gilt. Gibt es da schon etwas im Wiki?

Gruß aus HB!
Reclus (2016-05-19 15:04:37+00:00): Danke! Ich kenne da auch nichts. Ich hatte es auch nicht ursprünglich eingetragen, sondern nur blinds:* in blind:* geändert. Ich werde heute Abend nochmal im Wiki nachschauen und den Tag in etwas sinnvolleres abändern. Mglw. gibt es auch etwas unterhalb von dog:*.
highflyer74 (2016-05-19 15:24:31+00:00): Ach, entschuldige, das hatte ich nicht gesehen.
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Jojo4u (2016-05-17 06:59:53+00:00): Hallo 5R-MFT, source wird mittlerweile nicht mehr oft an die einzelnen Features getaggt. Am Changeset ist die Information ausreichend. 

Lg Joachim
Piskvor (2016-05-18 08:00:20+00:00): Není Vyskočilova na Budějovické? (Asi v editoru zůstává název předchozího changesetu)
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
woodpeck_repair (2016-05-20 03:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 39440562, 39439357, 39440062, 39439777, 39440318 where the changeset comment is: Revert a series of erroneous edits made by Facebook staff members in Thailand by their own request
Johnny Carlsen (2016-05-17 14:06:25+00:00): This changeset deleted 3 rather big roads:
377297509, v3
130517819, v4
130513566, v7
I am working on restoring the individual roads again.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-05-17 14:06:53+00:00): 377297509, v3 - restored
Johnny Carlsen (2016-05-17 14:18:20+00:00): All roads restored again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377297509/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130517819/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130513566/history
gormo (2016-06-29 13:23:18+00:00): Hi,

there already is a boundary for the national park, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56117565 . Please respect existing data while importing, and please tag any new information onto the existing OSM features. And please use established OSM tags, and don't just dump some external data onto OSM. Thanks, gormo
cleary (2016-07-01 00:48:41+00:00): I'm sorry for any error. I have been checking administrative boundaries in South Australia and adding relations for those boundaries. In many instances, national park boundaries coincide with administrative boundaries and, where no relation previously existed, I have also created relations for the national parks so that a single way could be shared by both administrative and national park boundaries. In some cases, as many as four relations share a single way.  Because of the frequent coinciding of boundaries, I have also checked the boundaries of national parks adjacent to the administrative boundaries - while most were accurate, a small number required correction/updating. In such cases, I have also changed tags to reflect the source from which the current data was obtained.  However I can see that there would have been no reason for me to create a new relation for Calpatanna Waterhole Conservation Park and it is apparent I was not sufficiently careful about the existing relation.  Thanks for your advice.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-05-19 02:22:26+00:00): We are currently seeing a high amount of changesets from different users with similar changeset comments, some contain edits that are problematic. We would love to get your input in our forum so we can learn more about these edits.

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54648

I'd also recommend pausing your edits until we get it all sorted out.
AkuAnakTimur (2016-05-17 13:17:00+00:00): Some road geometry were traced fine, but not the others. Very likely unnoticed error.
Hjart (2016-05-17 01:09:00+00:00): All of the items added in Copenhagen were already on the map, so I'm removing them again. Creating duplicates is not a good idea.
Lovisamjoll (2016-05-17 00:31:54+00:00): House
highflyer74 (2016-05-17 11:11:31+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

For crossings have a look at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:crossing

All the best,

highflyer74
Lovisamjoll (2016-05-17 00:32:25+00:00): Houses
Lovisamjoll (2016-05-17 00:32:55+00:00): Houses
highflyer74 (2016-05-17 09:53:13+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

All the best,

highflyer74
pete404 (2016-05-17 12:36:26+00:00): *bus route 711
Jojo4u (2016-05-17 06:52:15+00:00): Danke! Und ich wollte auf der Mailing Liste schon fragen ob Netz  2016 koordiniert werden sollte. Aber wenn alles mit einem Changeset erledigt ist...
user_5359 (2016-05-17 19:10:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: You don't add any information to your node!
user_5359 (2016-05-17 19:12:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice You add the information into the Lake Sakakawea und don't think there is a artwork !
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2016-05-17 07:58:15+00:00): Hi sathishshetty,
you've added a lot of highway=residential (correct) AND highways=residential (incorrect) streets.

Do you think you can correct this by removing the last tag?

Thanks!
yogi_ks (2016-05-17 13:48:05+00:00): User seems to continue adding wrong tags - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39376307
Have also messaged the user requesting to look into these.
literan (2016-05-17 12:54:46+00:00): Не совсем понимаю, зачем теги отеля, курорта перенесли на незамкнутую линию http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418883427#map=17/55.85999/37.30215 - в общем, там теперь какой-то бардак.
Papayaved (2016-05-17 14:54:38+00:00): исправлю - забыл что на линии не только забор)
d1754 (2016-06-26 22:46:59+00:00): Somebody had deleted the Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road and placed houses there that were already demolished.  Please advice those people partIicipating on your #ProjectNOAH-ISAIAH not to delete anything because the BING MAP being used is to old.  Please compare it to the GOOGLE EARTH before digitizing or better digitize it on GOOGLE EARTH then import it on openstreetmap using potlatch 2. I know some of the participants are newbies in mapping. Regards.
schadow1 (2016-06-27 01:11:50+00:00): 1) Please specify the specific changeset that deleted the "Ayala Mall Serin Diversion Road" so we can address the specific issue
2) Digitizing from Google Earth is not allowed in OSM due to incompatible license
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28089/can-i-overlay-google-earth-images-to-edit-osm-accurately
3) Please specify any changesets in your knowledge created  in OSM that has been traced from Google so it can be reverted due to licensing issues.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-22 08:40:36+00:00): Hej.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39482972
Michael Steffens (2016-05-23 14:24:46+00:00): Hallo FvGordon,

aus welcher Internetquelle hast du die Zugehörigkeit der Gebäude am Brinkumer Moor entnommen?

In der Kartendarstellung von https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/ verläuft die Grenze auf der Straße. Demnach müssten die Nummern 2 und 6 aber zu Weyhe gehören, genau wie 4 und 8. Die ersten beiden hättest du dann falsch zugeordnet. Die alternierende Zuordnung auf derselben Straßenseite sieht auch nicht sehr plausibel aus.

Allerdings war meine ursprüngliche Annahme, dass alle Gebäude zu Weyhe gehören (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/567157) auch falsch. Ich hatte das aus der Antwort "alle" für "Weyhe, Brinkumer Moor" geschlossen. Dieselbe Antwort bekommt man aber auch für "Stuhr, Brinkumer Moor". Wenig hilfreich ...

Cheers!
Michael
FvGordon (2016-05-23 17:17:46+00:00): Wenn ich in eine Internet-Suchmaschine meiner Wahl "Brinkumer Moor 2" oder "Brinkumer Moor 6" eingebe, erhalte ich nur Einträge mit der PLZ 28816, Während ich bei den Hausnummern 4 und 8 nur 28844 erhalte. Daraus schließe ich der Verlauf der PLZ-Grenze.
Franz
Michael Steffens (2016-05-23 20:57:14+00:00): Hallo Franz, das überzeugt. Habe meine Note geschlossen. Vielen Dank!

Michael
Supaplex (2016-05-17 07:25:01+00:00): 不好意思，臺灣的行政區用的是「里」，不是「裡」
chihchun (2016-05-17 15:57:21+00:00): 那個 "http://maps.nlsc.gov.tw/S_Maps/wmts/EMAP/default/EPSG:3857/" 不算開放資料，授權嚴格上是不可以描繪的唷。

請用這兩個
臺灣通用電子地圖(含等高線)開放資料 - http://maps.nlsc.gov.tw/S_Maps/wmts/EMAP5_OPENDATA/default/EPSG:3857/{z}/{y}/{x}
臺灣通用電子地圖(不含等高線)開放資料
http://maps.nlsc.gov.tw/S_Maps/wmts/EMAP6_OPENDATA/default/EPSG:3857/{z}/{y}/{x}
愛台玩 (2016-05-18 02:57:20+00:00): 圖資内容一樣
差在地址
因台湾山友登山紀錄有地址项目
為了校正与描绘精確住址才引用的
chihchun (2016-05-18 07:43:36+00:00): 理解需求。

但是按照您當初加入 OSM 開設帳號後所簽署的貢獻者條款，請只使用合法授權的底圖，正式版的「臺灣通用電子地圖」只能作為交叉參考使用，不可作為描繪使用。
愛台玩 (2016-05-18 08:16:25+00:00): 了解
三套图内容一樣
差在級數不同

你的意思是描绘時用你建議的網址
要比对登山口住家地址号碼对不对時再切換到目前的網址？
愛台玩 (2016-05-18 08:24:51+00:00): 剛查了nlsc qa可使用
Wmts
有台湾通用电子地图