piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-04-20 15:17:03+00:00): Marco... 

Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83828804
Let op dat je de paden niet vastplakt aan de landuse.
Met CTRL in plakt het tijdens intekenen niet. Met de G toets kun je de paden na selectie losmaken.
Wel weer dan de twee einden opnieuw verbinden. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-20 15:44:27+00:00): Nog even in josm gekeken. Eigenlijk zit er niets geplakt.. Het leek alleen maar zo. Lijkt me dus allemaal gelukt. :)
Gr eggie
Marco Nell (2020-04-21 12:17:30+00:00): Fijn dat je meekijkt, Eggie. Het is allemaal nogal nieuw. Ook verslavend...
Groeten, Marco
trigpoint (2020-04-20 16:38:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add what exists in real life, please do not add test data.

The description 'to be planted' suggests that this is not yet a wood so plrobably shouldn't be mapped as one. The name NRN looks odd, the name field is for actual names and abbreviations are rarely names of woods.

Please only add what really, exists and please remember that OSM is a live database.

Cheers Phil
jmapb (2020-04-30 21:01:09+00:00): Hi Alyona and welcome to OSM!

This building was marked as having two addresses, 81 7th Avenue South and 22 Barrow Street. It looks like you removed those and you're trying to give it just one address, 18 Barrow Street. Is that correct?
SomeoneElse (2025-11-08 21:52:45+00:00): Hello,
You've added a name:en here of "Church of Our Lady" (which is a translation of the words in the German name), but in English I've always known it in English as the "Frauenkirche".
Best Regards,
Andy
Detektiv Jim Gordon (2025-11-10 17:19:26+00:00): Hello Andy, I have taken the English name of the Dresden Frauenkirche from travel guides and from the English Wikipedia. The name 'Church of Our Lady' can also be kept as an alt_name. What do you mean?
SomeoneElse (2025-11-11 20:00:30+00:00): The English wikipedia is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frauenkirche,_Dresden and actually matches my recollection of English name usage.  "Church of Our Lady" is in brackets on the first line as a translation, but the name Frauenkirche is used as the name subsequently.
That approach is similar to other things that aren't translated into English, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pont_Neuf .
Detektiv Jim Gordon (2025-11-14 17:03:31+00:00): You can change it if you want.
jtracey (2020-04-20 16:07:34+00:00): Thanks for the edits. :) So far it all looks good, but as a word of caution, Esri imagery is years out of date in the Kitchener-Waterloo area, and there's been a lot of buildings torn down for new apartment and condo towers in that time. A sanity check with Bing imagery helps, particularly if you're armchair mapping.
eireidium (2020-04-20 16:10:22+00:00): Thanks for the note. I shoud have been more prudent in checking the dates for the area. Bing is more dated where I normally am mapping and ESRI more current. My assumption. Will have to revisit these edits. Thanks.
jtracey (2020-04-20 16:16:51+00:00): No worries, like I said the edits so far look good to me. Just noticed the Esri tag in the edit and thought I'd mention it.
eireidium (2020-04-20 16:31:15+00:00): Is appreciated. Sincerely. Flipping back and forth now as we go. Best. Shawn
Vinber (2020-04-23 11:59:02+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-23 12:01:51+00:00): Si la quincaillerie utilise l'ensemble du bati, alors vous pouvez également qualifier l'ensemble du bati avec shop=hardware. Si vous ne comprenez pas, n'hésitez pas à répondre :)
camelCaseNick (2020-04-23 21:56:01+00:00): Hey,
your species:wikidata=ducks, is not a wikidata id. Should it be Q7556? But maybe you know a more specific taxon.
CamelCaseNick
camelCaseNick (2020-04-23 21:58:16+00:00): And for species:wikidata=horses it could be Q27022, but there definitely could be a more specific taxon.
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-01-05 00:22:23+00:00): Mais pourquoi recopier la ref dans le nom. Ou c'est une ref (ce que c'est en fait) ou c'est un nom (un nom ? pour un panneau ?)
svrider10 (2022-01-06 12:25:45+00:00): Tout simplement car certains logiciels cartographiques affichent la ref et d'autres le nom. De cette façon on est sûr que le n° de la balise sera toujours affiché sur la carte.
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-01-06 13:25:34+00:00): Alors maintenant "on taggue pour le rendu ?"
Frans S (2020-04-22 15:14:14+00:00): Hello nurpursavani.
I came across your mappings during a survey and have some remarks.
You changed tags of unclassified highways into tag tertiary.
Please reread the wiki about highways and how to tag them
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Please use the Maxar imagery. Much more recent
best regards
Retired Account (2020-04-21 13:42:42+00:00): Hi,
You have been removing the parking_aisle tags on roads where there is clearly parking lots on sides of the road. Are you able to explain the rational of removing information from the ways?
Footyfootfella (2020-04-21 20:34:18+00:00): Hi JaLooNz,
Thank you for reaching out. I removed the service = parking_aisle tag because my understanding is that these roads are not acting as parking aisles but rather a road connecting to a through street.
For example, on way 171053201, I removed the service = parking_aisle tag. According to OSM wiki, if the road connects a parking lot or parking garage to a through street and serves as the entrance or exit, or forms the perimeter of the parking lot, then we would just leave the road as highway = service. 
I found the information on classifying service ways here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
In the case of way 793212591, you are correct with classifying the road as service = parking_aisle. I will double check my work to ensure I did not remove any valid service tags.
If you have any other questions or concerns feel free to message me back. 
-Footyfootfella
Retired Account (2020-07-31 06:50:29+00:00): Hi,
I would like the ADT team to immediately stop touching all relevant service road edits, which have removed various service=driveway and service=parking_aisle tags. I don't agree with the Wiki tagging conventions, and I certainly do not like tagging conventions from other regions forced down my throat.
Footyfootfella (2020-08-04 16:27:16+00:00): Hello JaLooNz, 
It appears there’s a difference in strategy for modeling these residential and service roads. My team’s understanding comes from a combination of both the global community’s policies on service roads (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service) but we’re also using feedback from the Malaysian community (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysian_Roads_Tagging). We understand there’s a difference in guidelines being used for these neighborhood streets but the goals are the same. If you could help explain the decision to use service tags that could help a lot.  Looking around, it would appear the Singapore community wiki contains guidelines which are closer to what you’re discussing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Singapore#Roads). Are you following the Singapore modeling guidelines?
Hungerburg (2020-04-20 20:57:51+00:00): Hallo Zunterkopf; was hat es mit dem Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7426473580 auf sich, den du angelegt hast?
Hungerburg (2020-04-20 21:48:28+00:00): PS: ein Fußweg ist das sicher auch keiner dort; hast du die Wiki Seite aus dem letzten Kommentar gelesen?
Zunterkopf (2020-04-21 07:25:14+00:00): Hallo Hungerburg ! Nein, das ist ein schmaler Pfad. Ich habe sichtlich noch Probleme bei der richtigen Bezeichnung.
Der Punkt wurde irrtümlich angelegt.
Mit etwas mehr Übung wird es wohl besser werden.
Hungerburg (2020-04-21 07:38:23+00:00): Einverstanden :) Die Bezeichnung im ID Editor (im Webbrowser der) für solche Pfade ist auch recht unglücklich gewählt.
user_5359 (2020-04-20 18:29:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
cedaros (2020-07-08 13:57:08+00:00): Na podstawie jakiego źródła dodałeś nazwę lasu?
Arnebius (2020-07-08 15:42:39+00:00): Na podstawie lokalnej wiedzy, miejscowi leśnicy i myśliwi tak  nazywają ten kompleks.
Luzandro (2020-04-22 05:52:53+00:00): Hallo,

darf ich fragen, warum du hier tracktype entfernt hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118098586/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83833307
eggie (2020-04-20 17:40:35+00:00): Oke... zit af en toe maar mee te kijken.. surface=sand. Op de brug?
Supaplex (2023-08-06 13:57:17+00:00): 咦，你好像不小心把公車站與商家合併，也造成公車路線出錯。已經將相關錯誤修正了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139501240
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83834177
Евреи (2020-04-20 18:14:07+00:00): Dear Sergey,
your mapping work seems to be very good.

But what's the point of spreading your mail address into all of your changesets? You might get spam mails, it's also against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments !
hsc666 (2020-04-20 18:53:28+00:00): Hallo vecker und herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Bitte sieh Dir <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de> an, wie wir die Eigenschaften von Ladestationen eintragen! Das gehört nicht zu description. Bei Fragen melde Dich einfach wieder hier.
VG
hsc666
kartler175 (2020-04-22 08:53:42+00:00): Bitte Fehler beseitigen: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.01842&lat=51.09978&zoom=15&opacity=1.00
Frans S (2020-04-21 11:54:31+00:00): Hello Amoiwai
Please use Maxar imagery. Recently changed in the instructions
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2020-04-20 22:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aceman444 (2020-04-20 21:28:56+00:00): Zdravim, ake konkretne chyby (issues) ste tu riesili? Lebo som namatkovo ziadnu opravu chyby nenasiel, len doplnanie nepovinnych znaciek ci nove informacie o brand:* a pod. Cize len masove automaticke opavy, ktore Vam navrhol editor iD (ktory teda na takeho veci vobec nie je vhodny, lebo si vymysla vlastne pravidla) ? Na take masove zmeny su pravidla, a aspon ich neoznacujte takym klamlivym popisom sad zmien.

Naopak, pozeram, ze ste nove chyby prave vytvorili, napr. bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7426659123 je nespravny, nema existovat, precitajte si wiki o parkoviskach . Takze skuste s tymito neopodstatnenymi zmenami prestat. Dakujem
mapperue (2020-04-21 10:02:47+00:00): Zdravim, tie zmeny som revertol a parkovisko upravil podla pravidiel.
aceman444 (2020-04-21 14:07:14+00:00): Dakujem. Lebo ako som pozeral, pridali ste bus=yes na vsetky zastavky MHD, aj tam kde ziadny bus nestoji (ale napr. len trojebus). Naopak, nikde ste nepridali znacku pre trolejbus, ani pre elektricku. Cize zastavky oznacene len bus=yes, kde ale stoji napr. bus aj trolejbus su potom vlastne chybne a zavadzajuce. Takze to zase len iD je velmi mudry. Taketo masove pridanie volitelnych znaciek bez kontroly kazdeho jedneho objektu je teda skor skodlive. Znovu by som Vas poziadal o vyskusanie serioznejsieho editora, napr. JOSM, pri Vasom pocte zmien by to bolo uz uzitocnejsie a mate vacsiu kontrolu, co sa deje a ma konzervativnejsie kontroly chyb, takze je mensia sanca na skody. Dakujem
WoodWoseWulf (2020-04-20 23:06:16+00:00): Hi Oliver,
Please do not use the name tag to describe things. building=house is sufficient, you don't need to also type house into the name tag.
You can also square features in the ID editor by right clicking them and then selecting "square".
tuxayo (2020-04-23 17:08:26+00:00): manufacturer=* semble plus adapté que network=* pour indiquer le fabriquant. J'ai complété la caméra à Marseille.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84014872
hatul (2024-07-08 14:54:07+00:00): שלום יניב
זו אותה תמונה של הבור הזה. אני מניח שצריך למחוק אותה מאחת מהנקודות.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7416562766
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:05:07+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11017309 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:19:42+00:00): Olá,

ver também a relação 11017325.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:25:02+00:00): Olá,

ver também a relação 11017319.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:31:10+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017317
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 16:03:58+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017323
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:39:39+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017316
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:44:37+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017318
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:58:37+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017331
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 21:49:21+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017330
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 21:52:26+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017322
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:09:43+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017320
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:25:09+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017305
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:08:31+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017326
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:15:57+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017307
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:47:12+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017315
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:51:55+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017324
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-03 00:06:41+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017312
ToniE (2020-04-21 07:12:31+00:00): Servus,

bin gerade hier über das access=no gestolpert.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_227

Ist die Straße für länger gesperrt? Baustelle?

Könnte man das evtl. mit access:conditional = no @(2020 April 20-2020 yyyy zz) machen?

Viele Grüße,
Toni
landini (2020-04-21 07:31:09+00:00): Laut Gemeindeseite Oberhaching Baustelle bis 31.8.2020

https://www.oberhaching.de/baustellen

Der 227 fährt vermutlich Hahilingastrasse/Holzstrasse/Münchner Strasse/M 11

Wer kann Busse? Der 222 und 224 ist noch Stand Dezember 2019.

Beste Grüße
Richard
ToniE (2020-04-21 08:42:38+00:00): Hallo Richard,

mmh, ob sich die Änderungen am Bus lohnt, oder wir die Relation einfach so lassen? Sind eh nur noch etwas mehr als 4 Monate. Andererseits, diese Änderung ist recht einfach.

bzgl. access würde ich, da Anlieger noch zu ihren Häusern können, zu

motor_vehicle=destination @ (2020 April 20-2020 August 31)

tendieren, auch wenn's dann auf der Karte 'normal' aussieht.

Busse kann ich ganz gut. Ja, einige 2xx sind noch auf einem alten Stand.

Ich habe mich seit Anfang des Jahres mit GTFS vom MVV (und anderen) beschäftigt und die PTNA Website (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de) erweitert: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/index.php und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68957

Da kehrt nun etwas mehr Ruhe ein, so dass ich wohl wieder mal an die 2xx ran gehen kann - die GTFS-Analyse von PTNA hilft das ganz gut, da man nicht mehr die PDF-Pläne lesen muss. Daher wollte ich die GTFS-Dinge erst einmal zu Ende bringen.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
landini (2020-04-21 09:05:47+00:00): Auf der Karte 'normal' ausschauen sollte es auf keinen Fall. Ich bin beim planen von Fahrradtouren immer ganz froh wenn ich auf den ersten Blick sehen kann, dass da was nicht passierbar ist. Ideal ist Highway=construction, das sieht man sofort. Aber das mögen die Puristen ja wieder nicht.
 
Beim Bus 227 ändert sich für den Fahrgast ja nichts, also ist das nicht so wichtig.

Beste Grüße
Richard
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 12:51:07+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11017371
(Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros, renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:48:43+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017368
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:32:42+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017367
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:55:57+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017369
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 16:10:22+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017370
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:16:05+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017373
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:40:30+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017328
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:54:39+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017366
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-03 00:02:29+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017374
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-03 00:27:25+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017372
WoodWoseWulf (2020-04-20 23:02:39+00:00): Hi Jonathan,
Welcome to OSM!
I noticed that you used leisure=park tagging on some features in the existing park area such as the monument and the pavilion - there are other tags we can use to describe these features.
I often map using the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org this is a great resource if you're not sure how to tag something :)
letihu (2021-02-16 20:39:56+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793957715/history
denn darstellen? Nodes fehlen.
_torsten_ (2021-02-17 05:22:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war eine Hilfslinie und ich hab sie jetzt entfernt.
ququruzka (2020-09-03 16:10:06+00:00): всі імена мають бути виключно українською мовою
maraf24 (2020-05-03 11:55:23+00:00): Ale te budynki są wyburzone :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793963357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793964377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793965699
maraf24 (2020-05-03 11:56:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793963031
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793962274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793965632
maraf24 (2020-05-03 11:57:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793963017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793965676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793965683
maraf24 (2020-05-03 11:59:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793962853
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793962314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793964576
Piotr Strębski (2020-05-04 07:43:11+00:00): Super, dzięki za wyłapanie budynków do dalszej poprawy (stąd to cd. w tytule zestawu zmian ;-) ). Zmienią one lokalizację na brakujące obrysy potwierdzane KIEGem. Biorę pod uwagę, że ok 2% jest już nieaktualnych, jednak jesteśmy do przodu w 98! I lokalsy mogą już mniej po omacku zgłaszać brakujące poi + zmiany w zabudowie. Pozdrowienia!
maraf24 (2020-05-04 11:18:39+00:00): Akurat takie myślenie, że jeśli 98% danych jest ok to dane są ok, nie przyjęło się w OSM i jest w tej sprawie jednolite orzecznictwo :)
Budynki w danych, które importowałeś, są stare i po prostu wymagają weryfikacji - każdego z budynku z osobna.
Bez tego robi się z tego zwykły import. 
A skoro używasz JOSMa to możesz wykonać bez trudu weryfikację: plugin Todo list; wrzucenie do niego wszystkich obiektów wybranych poprzez "type:way" i potem wystarczy klikać i patrzeć na orto.
Wcale nie takie trudne. Polecam.
Nb. ładne orto tu jest.
Pozdrawiam.
Piotr Strębski (2020-05-04 11:23:10+00:00): Tej wtyczki nie znałem, dzięki! Pewnie stanie się jedną z ulubionych, bo póki co to wszystko ręcznie (wizualnie) weryfikowałem - zawsze coś można było przeoczyć (stąd te 2% na margines własnych błędów) :-) Importy są z reguły fatalne, co chwila natykając się na nie w tym się utwierdzam. Ręczne robótki przy OSM - to jest to, co lubię najbardziej :-P
InsertUser (2022-10-16 13:21:45+00:00): How accurately did you place the southbound bus stop along Campden Road (node 7246815256)? There appears to be a stop area close to Flaxley road on Bing imagery.
dcpaschall (2020-04-20 18:55:55+00:00): Correction: ECG crosses from PA to NJ on Calhoun St from Morrisville, PA to Trenton, NJ.
rskedgell (2020-04-22 14:58:54+00:00): I think some of that FHRS and address data from Signorelli and Tonkotsu may have been inadvertently copied over to Itsu and Heavenly Desserts. I've updated them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83948236
spiregrain (2020-04-22 15:06:53+00:00): Yes - you're right - thank-you!
pio2_122 (2020-04-21 08:21:56+00:00): Dotychczasowe tagowanie było poprawnie. Niestety iD stosuje własny tag, który nie występuje nawet na oficjalnej OSM-wiki. Nie zapowiada się, aby mieli to poprawić :/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:crossing
Także, na przyszłość musisz ignorować uwagi odnośnie tagów przejść w iD...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83838723
owiecc (2020-04-21 18:01:16+00:00): Na angielskiej wiki ten tag istnieje: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
crossing=marked
Duplicate of crossing=uncontrolled, i.e. a crossing with road markings, but no traffic lights.
Pozmieniam z powrotem :/
pio2_122 (2020-04-21 19:06:23+00:00): Wielkie dzięki!
Swoją drogą, to chyba kolejny powód, który zachęca do używania innych edytorów, np. JOSM'a :P

Szperając po angielskiej wiki znalazłem nawet swoistą "listę grzechów" iD:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
aceman444 (2022-11-23 06:46:23+00:00): Adding attraction=roller_caster to the roller_coaster=track is wrong and unneeded duplication with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7338922202 .

Also use proper changeset descriptions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments .