piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anisa IRM-ED (2020-10-27 04:10:05+00:00): Hi, Sal73x. I have adjusted the residential road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/652944241) based on Maxar Premium Imagery and I also made some changes around this changeset. Thank you
zors1843 (2019-04-30 07:29:43+00:00): Duplicate building removed - gallery added as POI
sapin615 (2019-04-30 12:23:34+00:00): Thank you !
gendy54 (2019-07-01 09:57:20+00:00): Salut Romain,
Pour quoi avoir supprimé l'indication de l'EFS? Il y a eu du changement?
Rom1 (2019-07-02 19:21:42+00:00): Salut Donat, l'EFS existe toujours mais sur le même objet cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652947298 et qui n'est pas rendu :(
OttawaHiking (2018-12-19 04:42:46+00:00): Hello, I'm a bit confused about this object. It seems that it shows Nepean as it was two hundred years ago. It has evolved since that time. Then should not we match it with a part of Ottawa that locals currently call as Nepean? That would probably be Nepean as of 2001 right before it was agglomerated into the city of Ottawa. Thank you!
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-12-19 19:00:02+00:00): got it from the city of Ottwa
OttawaHiking (2018-12-19 19:21:18+00:00): The boundary of Nepean has been changing over time. Instead of taking the oldest boundary, we better take the most recent one. Would you agree?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-12-19 21:42:38+00:00): I revised it to be out of the Downtown area of Ottawa I would need to find the postal code FSA boundaries that Canada Post refer Nepean to
eggie (2018-12-05 22:45:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-05 22:50:58+00:00): Het is niet erg duidelijk wat je bedoeling hier is. Je hebt over de gebouwen building=house getagd. wellicht bedoel je landuse=construction. Verder zijn nogal wat adressen van plaats verschoven. per abuis?
Alle gebouwen in OSM zijn import van het Kadaster. Op het moment dat de sloop is geweest kunnen de gebouwen worden weggehaald en maak je vlakken met landuse=residential. Voorlopig draai ik deze bijdrage terug. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2018-12-05 22:58:50+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #65220453 
Wanneer de sloop begonnen is zet je een vlak over alles heen met landuse=construction. De woningen staan nog niet op sloopvergunning.
De adressen die verschoven zijn heb ik hersteld.
Dit was je edit
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65218496

Zo staat alles bij het kadaster bekend. 
Wanneer al een sloopvergunning is verstrekt kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=jan%20lutma&resultOffset=0&objectId=0608100001228809&geometry.x=117962.09740052&geometry.y=440620.4665982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0608010001232905
MVG,
eggie
WoJ (2018-12-05 21:48:34+00:00): Erreur de commentaire - je voulais dire que le chemin à l'intérieur du square rejoint le parking
mbethke (2018-12-10 07:58:50+00:00): Hi,
"primary_link" is fine for the little u-turn connections between primary roads. I think routing software would prefer one to stay on the same kind of road so changing to residential could lead to detours when you have to turn.

cheers,
Matthias
saranotsarah (2018-12-10 21:39:38+00:00): Hello Matthias,

I had changed the highway classification of way 221467937 to residential because it connects the residential road (way 25807787) to both sides of the primary dual carriageway.
†hanks,
Sara
mbethke (2018-12-11 06:27:31+00:00): Yeah it does, and I used to do it like that for a while, too. But when you look at the streets themselves, it looks much more a part of Route 13 - being paved for example, unlike the two residential streets. If it's a primary_link, a router *might* be able to recognize a u-turn as such, but if the link was residential you'd get an instruction like "turn left on Hom 3, then after five meters turn left" when you're not actually supposed to enter Hom 3 but stay on the same road.

cheers,
Matthias
saranotsarah (2018-12-11 19:55:28+00:00): Hi Matthias,

I think it would depend on the routing engine, but I'm ok with keeping it how you have it.

Thanks,
Sara
mbethke (2019-01-18 08:11:30+00:00): Hi Sara,
gotta get back to that and apologize, please do continue the way you did when there's a crossing way. Some digging in the Wiki revealed I've been doing it wrong for quite a while. Sorry about that!

cheers,
Matthias
saranotsarah (2019-01-18 17:25:17+00:00): Thank you! 
Sara
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-05 22:31:56+00:00): Where are you getting maxspeed from?  Is this posted?  If there's no statutory or posted speed limit, then maxspeed is not applicable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65219938
mono1969 (2024-01-23 08:26:10+00:00): Warum ist da im der Kreisverkehrfläche ein Haltepunkt
FrankXF (2024-01-23 21:15:24+00:00): Hallo Mono, du meinst den Freiligrathplatz? Den hatte ich zentral bezogen auf alle dortigen Haltestellen gesetzt. Die U78 und U79 Haltestellen sind ja ein ganzes Stück auseinander. Da bot sich der Kreisverkehr an.
mueschel (2018-12-17 18:40:14+00:00): Hi,
you added several ways with the tag "100 = 40". Could you check and fix that?

Jan
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2018-12-18 16:49:06+00:00): Thank you. I have fixed them all.
Trevor_1 (2018-12-05 23:02:55+00:00): And corrected spelling
tux67 (2018-12-06 08:45:30+00:00): Hallo MaewNam,
du hattest ein Review angefordert. Grundsätzlich sieht der Change ok aus - nur eine Quellenangabe wäre noch nett gewesen (iD als Editor unterstützt das inzwischen ganz gut) - auch wenn sie mit dem Wikidata Verweis vielleicht überflüssig erscheint.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65220649
eggie (2018-12-05 23:36:44+00:00): Oke.. Volgens je edit gebruik je nu BING, maar die ligt enorm verschoven! pdok ligt wel goed.
Wanneer je de truuk gaat gebruiken  en de combinatie pdok en bgt omtrekgericht gebruikt kun je het wel precies uitlijnen.
Groet,
Eggie
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:54:52+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Endres Pelka (2018-12-07 20:17:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours
b-jazz (2018-12-08 00:28:44+00:00): Hi there Robert Lamm. Are you aware that the nodes that make up some of these boundaries are stacked on top of each other at least 6+ times? At least for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652979075, there are many nodes that occupy the same centimeter of space. Is that something you can clean up?
25or6to4 (2018-12-08 00:46:40+00:00): Wow!  The validator didn't catch that.  I'll start working on that now. I'll keep a closer eye on the rest of these as well.
chnav (2019-01-20 10:28:57+00:00): This is not trunk road. Please do not change road classes without local knowledge or contacting local mappers. This changeset will be reverted.
chnav (2019-01-20 10:46:56+00:00): This road has neither has trunk condition nor trunk traffic. Reconstruction is planned in couple of years.  

Reverted to primary.
whatmeinfallible (2019-01-21 18:59:57+00:00): Understood, thank you.
seattlefyi (2018-12-06 16:44:04+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding some addresses -- one OSM tagging convention we would ask: whenever adding street names, please expand all abbreviations (for example, Ave should be Avenue). Thanks again!
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 11:41:52+00:00): Hello Calero_talleres1,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 3 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40518878 was chanegd here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. Did you use Google for the streen name or is it an area that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 11:42:37+00:00): Hola Calero_talleres1,

Espero que no le importe que le pregunte sobre algo que se agregó a OpenStreetMap hace 3 años. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40518878 se cambió aquí con una etiqueta "source = Google Maps". En realidad, no podemos usar eso como fuente en OSM porque la licencia de Google no permite que se use aquí. ¿Usó Google para el nombre de la calle o es un área con la que está familiarizado?

Atentamente
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM
mueschel (2018-12-20 19:28:01+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "OHV" which is not used in any other place. Could you explain what it means?

Thanks,
Jan
jimlucas (2018-12-20 22:27:13+00:00): Hi Jan,
OHV - "off-highway vehicle" is widely used in W. Canada and probably in the US. It refers to dirt bikes, quads and side-by-sides i.e specialized vehicles that are not normally allowed on highways.  Usually snow machines (snowmobiles, snow bikes etc.) which are winter only vehicles are regulated separately. In Alberta, on public land, trails may be "designated" i.e. authorized for OHV use by the government.  Designated OHV trails may be further classified by type of OHV - dirt bikes (2-wheeled) or 4-wheeled and up to certain size/weight.  The word OHV is defined in provincial legislation.
Regards,   Jim
mueschel (2018-12-21 09:22:55+00:00): Ah ok, I recently saw some other uncommon (for OSM) vehicle classifications in Canada. I don't remember right now, I guess it was something like "smv". I think it would be good to create a Wiki page detailing all these Canadian classifications and come up with a common tagging scheme for them. 

I'm not familiar with Canadian law, so I can't help here.
jimlucas (2018-12-21 14:44:02+00:00): Hi Jan,
I should explain that I have limited ambitions with respect to OSM. My intent with adding these trail/tracks was to fill a knowledge gap in a small area where I have some expertise.
I mentioned OHV in the context of W. Canada/Alberta where I am reasonably familiar with issues relating to access to trails by OHVs.  A quick Google check on "USA and OHV" provides a link to the the US Forest Service: https://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv/ i.e. managing OHV use is a N. American wide issue and the acronym "OHV" is also widely used.  What you can say is that the regulation of OHV use and access varies across many provinces/states/government agencies ... and also is evolving both in the definition of OHVs and access. In other words, this would be a big exercise to create a consistent classification.  
I have limited my classification to what is regulated by the Alberta provincial government in my corner of the province.  That is changing - a designated OHV trail today may not be designated next year; a trail designated for OHV up to a certain width/weight may be changed to something else. 
In summary, I think "OHVs" are an important class of vehicles and it is certainly helpful to know where they are allowed to operate - at least for recreation.  You have to rely on locals to stay up with developments in their area.
Regards, Jim
aharvey (2018-12-06 02:20:09+00:00): looks good to me
Spanholz (2018-12-06 19:43:31+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Great to see new mappers in West Virginia.
I saw that you added some buildings. Did you try some other imagery layers, where you can see them better? It is also better to draw the buildings rectangular. You can do that with pressing "s" afterwards in the editor.

Have fun mapping!
jmapper (2018-12-07 00:33:35+00:00): Thanks for the tips. I see what you mean. I'll keep practicing. 
thanks
Joe
FredrikLindseth (2018-12-06 02:02:00+00:00): This is all in Norway for the curious Finnish and Sweedish among you
Cyclono (2018-12-06 16:24:20+00:00): Klopt, en vogels BAG staan er wat schuren tussen de huizen iets in het zuiden. Je mag ze met een BAG import toevoegen als je wilt:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=93027.00671875&geometry.y=438948.44984375&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0599100100004376&detailsObjectId=0599100100004376
Phyks (2018-12-06 07:54:13+00:00): Hi,

Here is some feedback about this changeset. There is a missing "n" in the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652987557.

Concerning the two others parkings (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652987555 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652987556), I think there should be an "access=customers" tag, isn't it?

Best,
Cyclono (2018-12-07 09:31:03+00:00): Zo Den Hoorn wordt helemaal vol gebouwd. Vroeger was het allemaal grasland hier :/
eggie (2021-09-12 15:05:02+00:00): Beste Padvinder. Omdat je overal tracks tekent door het akkerland gaat die gewoon ongewenst routeren in routeplanner en gpsr.
Ik heb wat op access=private gezet. 
Heb je hier dan daadwerkelijk gefietst?
MVG
eggie
viloan (2018-12-06 03:39:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mbethke (2018-12-10 07:54:24+00:00): That doesn't make sense. Is it a hotel or a bookmaker?
chnav (2018-12-06 06:08:16+00:00): Здравствуйте, я навесил на точку теги трансформатора на столбе. Уточните тут в комментарии если это не так.
Спасибо.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:02:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:04:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:04:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:04:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:04:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:36:53+00:00): ¿Por qué debo comentar el conjunto de cambios?  
Hay muchas razones...:  
-Por cortesía a sus compañeros editores del mapa, ya que les facilita entender lo que hizo y por qué...  
-Para evitar malos entendidos y que los errores se puedan arreglar rápidamente..., etc,etc.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:40:41+00:00): *Ocasionalmente, você pode ser contatado por outros mapeadores questionando sobre suas edições. Por favor, não ignore mensagens de outros. Se outro mapeador investiu tempo para examinar sua edição e contatar-lhe com alguma pergunta, as perguntas merecem uma resposta.*  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Bons_coment.C3.A1rios_para_conjunto_de_altera.C3.A7.C3.B5es_.28changesets.29
mavl (2019-07-21 13:05:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:05:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:05:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:05:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Carnildo (2018-12-06 09:45:08+00:00): Standard practice is to only add a name to the school building if it's different from what's on the school grounds.
mbethke (2019-09-16 08:28:34+00:00): Hi,
what's the correct name here, Ban Nam Poun our Ban Naxou?
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:54:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
julcnx (2021-10-02 05:10:04+00:00): Hi NateeT, when you added motor_vehicle=yes to highway=path, did you mean it's wide enough for a 4WD/pickup truck? if yes, why not using highway=track ?
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:36:46+00:00): ¿Por qué debo comentar el conjunto de cambios?  
Hay muchas razones...:  
-Por cortesía a sus compañeros editores del mapa, ya que les facilita entender lo que hizo y por qué...  
-Para evitar malos entendidos y que los errores se puedan arreglar rápidamente..., etc,etc.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:40:54+00:00): *Ocasionalmente, você pode ser contatado por outros mapeadores questionando sobre suas edições. Por favor, não ignore mensagens de outros. Se outro mapeador investiu tempo para examinar sua edição e contatar-lhe com alguma pergunta, as perguntas merecem uma resposta.*  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Bons_coment.C3.A1rios_para_conjunto_de_altera.C3.A7.C3.B5es_.28changesets.29
Frans S (2019-09-08 08:00:27+00:00): Hi Rosey.  I am reviewing tasks on this project and noticed a number of paths you changed from  road into path, I don't know it was done by a previous mapper but quite a number of these paths ends up on a corner of a building. This is not correct as you might know. Highways might not end on area or building nodes. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Kitty_Mars (2019-09-09 06:52:22+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. The roads were added by a previous mapper. Happy mapping!
mavl (2019-07-23 21:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
sergeybe (2018-12-07 17:51:38+00:00): Почему опять удалили за место того чтобы перенести?
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:54:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:53:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
sergeybe (2018-12-07 17:48:43+00:00): Здравствуйте!
1. Откуда данные о высоте 1451. Нет ни одного источника подтверждающего эту высоту;
2.Почему вы удалили старую точку и сделали новой? Можно было просто перенести на нужное место;
3. Вы не ответили ни на один мой комментарий. Я буду обращаться к DWG чтобы ваш аккаунт заблокировали.
Phyks (2018-12-06 10:19:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture. Je ne suis pas sûr de bien comprendre l'utilisation de "barrier=ditch" ici. La route était déjà marquée comme fermée et en "access=no", signalant qu'elle n'était plus utilisable.

"barrier=ditch" est un type très précis de barrière (un fossé en l'occurence). Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=ditch?uselang=fr.

Est-ce vraiment le cas sur le terrain ?

Bonne journée,
Phyks (2018-12-06 10:20:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture de cette modification. La modification a laissé l'attribut "highway=traffic_signal" qui indique qu'un feu est présent. Selon OSM, il y a donc toujours un feu ici.

Si le feu a bel et bien été supprimé, il faudrait supprimer l'attribut "highway=traffic_signal" sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6063515797 complètement.

Bonne journée,
mavl (2019-07-23 20:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:52:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
Phyks (2018-12-06 10:22:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture. Il manque des attributs pour indiquer que c'est une aire d'accueil et qu'elle puisse être clairement identifiable comme telle. Je vous invite à regarder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Aires_d%27accueil_des_gens_du_voyage pour tous les détails.

Bonne journée,
mavl (2019-07-23 21:01:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].