piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jgaordhelagenornres (2022-11-29 17:27:31+00:00): Damit in der Karte sichtbar ist, wo sich die Haltestellen früher befanden.
In gewisser Weise ist der Ort der nicht mehr existenten Haltestelle ja ein "Platz" (Schienen und Bahnsteig -> eine Fläche).
Wenn gewünscht, ändere ich das auf "place=locality". (damit würde der Name in der Karte auch noch angezeigt werden)

Bei anderen Haltestellen (bspw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775337561) habe ich das Schema "landuse=railway" angewandt (mit dem Namen der Haltestelle), aber das geht bei aufgelassenen Bahnstrecken ja nicht mehr, da es keine Eisenbahnfläche mehr ist.
alxGS (2022-11-30 08:08:42+00:00): Naja, place=square wär ja für öffentliche Plätze im urbanen Setting, trifft hier nicht wirklich zu. place=locality würd da schon eher passen.
Aber warum muss der Name auf der Karte sichtbar sein? Diese Karte zeigt eben die Namen von ehemaligen Haltestellen nicht an. Das zu umgehen mit welchen Tags auch immer wär doch Taggen für den Renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer).
Jgaordhelagenornres (2022-12-02 18:05:31+00:00): Okay passt, werde ich jetzt gleich wieder retour ändern.
cartofy (2023-01-23 08:37:45+00:00): Again, you've added random features. Why? There's no farm here. Please only add things that exist.
felipeeugenio (2022-11-25 22:19:57+00:00): Hola. Por favor no desplazar caminos con cada actualización de fotos. En realidad no sabemos cual es más exacta. Con otra actualización puede volver a donde estaba. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129379846
CasGroenigen (2022-11-25 19:10:21+00:00): How do I revert this? something clearly went wrong
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 19:08:33+00:00): Oficjalne konto na Twitterze @XMamuski na początku jego założenia zamieszczało posty typowe dla mass-botów. (#news #worldnews #news - kompletnie niezwiązane z działalnością konta).
Glassman (2022-11-27 19:59:49+00:00): #TIP: highway=footway is similar to what we call a sidewalk in the US. Because OSM was started in England we use British English for tags which can be confusing at times. 

highway=path is what we call a trail in the US. Typically much narrower than a footway. Can you review your edits to see if the trails you added are footways or paths? Thanks. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129380214
Dawid2849 (2022-11-25 19:56:40+00:00): Te budynki nie zostały wyburzone: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/791017914525679616/1045789917046906920/image.png

https://powiatrzeszowski.geoportal2.pl/map/www/mapa.php?CFGF=wmsx&mylayers=%20granice%20OSM%20zudd%20&myqlayers=%20&bbox=7575324.797,5551922.453,7575651.359,5552089.445
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 22:55:02+00:00): Witaj! Proszę o udzielenie się w dyskusji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129342706
NieWnen (2022-11-26 14:19:29+00:00): Wycofałem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129404127
TheUKHighStreet (2022-11-25 19:41:30+00:00): Please revert this if you can - I've somehow clicked on the map by mistake and moved a bollard without meaning to. Currently looking up how to revert a mistake.
TheUKHighStreet (2022-11-25 20:28:16+00:00): I think I've undone the mistake.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-11-03 11:52:16+00:00): Hi, do you know if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845476068#map=19/58.36202/26.65943 should have a bicycle access too?
eggie (2022-11-25 19:57:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Wellicht heeft je pad toch de naam Diepvoorde?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-25 20:09:15+00:00): Straatnaam toegevoegd plus paaltjes , slingerhek en surfacetag.
Mapse
eggie
joel56dt (2022-11-26 00:31:37+00:00): Hi Coinoswallet, can you please use more descriptive changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks,
Joel
eggie (2022-11-25 20:00:39+00:00): Het kan zo wel, maar het is ook gebruikelijk een trottoir op te nemen in de tagging van het fietspad met sidewalk=left of right
Glassman (2022-11-27 19:56:57+00:00): It looks like you duplicated a section of the footway with the residential road. I went ahead and removed the duplicate sections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129381046
look4book (2022-11-26 08:34:25+00:00): Hallo hNdrX_ - ist die Ladestation noch in Betrieb? Viele andere dieser Bauart sind derzeit abgedeckt und unbenutzbar. Bitte bestätigen..
hNdrX_ (2022-11-26 10:02:34+00:00): wie in der Beschreibung angegeben habe ich nur die Eigenschaften erneuert, weil veraltet - und nicht jede Ladesäule auf seine Funktionsfähigkeit getestet...
s8evq (2022-11-26 20:54:10+00:00): Deze is volledig goed, bedankt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129381130
ZeLonewolf (2022-11-29 01:40:57+00:00): Looks like I had some kind of issue with JOSM not closing my changesets.  Sorry about the large bounding box!
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-26 07:32:10+00:00): Nur ein Test oder ist dieser Steig gesperrt?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
faith_in_chaos (2022-11-26 10:30:07+00:00): kein Test. Der Steig ist ab da (strafbewährt) gesperrt, da die natur sich erholen muss.

(diese frage hab ich neulich schonmal bekommen. ich würde gar nicht auf die idee kommen, mit der live-karte zu testzwecken herumzuspielen. ist das ein ding?)
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-26 11:23:12+00:00): Ok, Danke für die Antwort.

Ich sehe aber gerade, der Folgeweg war ohnehin entsprechend gekennzeichnet, siehe [1]. Wäre es nicht sinnvoller an die Node ein barrier anstatt eines access-Keys zu hängen? Laut Recherche sind dort Stahlseile [2] gespannt, die den Durchgang untersagen.

Ansonsten ja, es gibt auch Nutzer die testweise Daten editieren, um etwas "auszuprobieren".

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184434969
[2] https://www.nordbayern.de/region/zum-schutz-der-natur-selfie-hotspot-am-konigssee-wird-fur-funf-jahre-gesperrt-1.11184687
faith_in_chaos (2022-11-26 11:32:34+00:00): klingt gut. ich versteh noch nicht so ganz, wie objekte verbunden werden, so dass das barrier dann beim routing berücksichtig wird. würd mich freuen, wenn dus machst, sonst les ich mich mal ein bei gelegenheit.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-28 19:18:06+00:00): Hab's ergänzt, vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129462120

Viele Grüße, Pascal
#HappyMapping
eggie (2023-12-08 20:35:39+00:00): De landuse weer gesteld. Geen gesloten polygoon.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144917005#map=17/52.66468/4.73001
gr eggie
eggie (2023-12-08 20:37:04+00:00): De sloten liggen weer allemaal over de landuse heen.
Dat kan toch anders.
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 10:11:06+00:00): Hm, was that really worth doing? It’s not like "8 kms" is supported (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units), even if the wiki is permitting of plural time units. Wasn’t a typo of mine.
Dimitar155 (2022-11-27 10:50:52+00:00): There are different rules for maxstay (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay#Time_unit).
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 10:56:11+00:00): Maxstay wiki is written such that plurals are accepted for plural coefficients, not that plural is the only accepted form.
Dimitar155 (2022-11-27 11:42:56+00:00): The plural form is for numbers bigger than one. As you can see, I haven't changed "1 hour" to "1 hours".
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 11:48:26+00:00): "Valid units include: …, hour" - you aren't reading the same as me. You are interpreting the allowance of plural units as de facto. This is all fairly pointless when user agents have to support both forms.
Dimitar155 (2022-11-27 12:01:16+00:00): "Valid units include: …, hour ... and their plural form when the number is above one, e.g., 1 day, 2 days, 5 hours"
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 12:03:41+00:00): Sigh, your logic grip is poor. There's nothing there that says singular units are for use with singular coefficients.
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 12:04:25+00:00): I meant ‘aren’t‘
Dimitar155 (2022-11-27 12:13:54+00:00): Plural units are for plural coefficients => singular units are for singular coefficients.
Pink Duck (2022-11-27 13:23:51+00:00): In normal language, perhaps. In computational tagging with defined values, change like this adds no value.
Muhmaker (2022-11-26 14:46:45+00:00): Hi. Da hast du ja einen unschönen Spezialfall entdeckt. Ich kenne mich zwar mit der internen Logik der Routing-Algorithmen nicht aus, vermute aber, dass sie sich von der Hecke nicht wirklich beeindrucken lassen werden. Vielleicht bringt es mehr, die Eingänge explizit an der West-Seite der Gebäude zu markieren oder sogar Adress-Knoten auf die Eingänge zu legen. Das Tagging müsste dann eventuell mit note genauer erklärt werden, damit nicht der nächste Mapper alles wieder "schön ordentlich" macht. Zur associatedStreet-Relation habe ich keine Meinung.
segubi (2022-11-26 18:05:33+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung jedenfalls. Ich versuch's mal doch in der community. Mal sehen, was da geantwortet wird... Die Hecke wird natürlich ignoriert...
Adikso (2022-11-25 20:24:53+00:00): "@" w username tiktoka to chyba niepoprawne
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 20:29:07+00:00): Na Twitterze bez "@" jest błędem, na TikTok nie ma oficjalnej dokumentacji a username zawiera "@" więc zapożyczyłem użycie z T. Na taginfo są użycia z "@" (108 użyć tylko). Jak będzie coś oficjalnie ustalone to się automatem przejedzie.
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 20:29:57+00:00): No ale w sumie jedyne wspomnienie na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:* nie ma "@", poprawie, obojętne tak szczerze :D
Vinber (2023-04-02 20:23:21+00:00): Bonjour,
n'oubliez pas de fermer les notes également quand vous ajoutez la donnée :)
exemple ici et cette note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3455329

je la ferme donc
geo-d (2022-11-29 15:43:21+00:00): Korrektur: source ist nicht survey, sondern Web-Recherche und z.T. mapillary
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-11-26 08:33:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129392921 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fake research and vandalism
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-11-25 21:25:24+00:00): Hello. You're using the "name" tag in a wrong way, please don't do it. Your changes will be reverted.
map per (2022-11-26 11:25:04+00:00): Just for documenting what happened here:
This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129383693 by Soshal Distan Singh
map per (2022-11-26 11:22:28+00:00): This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129383693 by Soshal Distan Singh
skorasaurus (2022-11-30 20:19:40+00:00): Hi, 

thanks for the edits. Have you personally verified if the clark fields are now open ? I was last there in August and the fields were still closed.  (if so, please delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277932239
Jrachi (2022-11-26 17:23:44+00:00): Ciao.
Nel prolungare la strada (244681188) hai "rotto" la relazione del 501.
Fulvio Senore (2022-11-26 18:50:09+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione. Non ho una grande esperienza con le relazioni e non mi sono accorto che la strada che ho prolungato si è portata dietro la relazione biforcando il percorso.
Adesso spero di avere corretto l'errore.
Jrachi (2022-11-26 19:18:10+00:00): Tutto a posto!
Un buon lavoro!
Grazzie.
JJIglesias (2022-11-25 22:55:32+00:00): Saludos. Las imagenes de Bing de esa zona esta MUY DESACTUALIZADA, por favor utiliza imagenes MAXAR.

Gracias
JJ
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-26 11:11:51+00:00): in Friuli Venezia-Giulia there are very precise orthophotos and hillshades, quite recent (2020).
For iD just add your custom string:

http://irdat-ortofoto.regione.fvg.it/geoserver/ows?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=ortofoto:trueorto_FVG_1720&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT= {height}&BBOX={bbox}

But it also works with JOSM
If you want more info or help, I'm at your disposal.

You can see the detail by comparing your changes here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Lofudh0CRH3LDl7qznpJzOWMU6U27Aqp/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LoxWhBkmHYghguBs8U0oOfPOSX0KbtVh/view?usp=sharing

Before your changes the path was more precise, now I'm going to correct it.

Hi Michele.
MitjaJez (2022-11-28 22:30:39+00:00): Thank you for ortophoto.

I believe that only Rilke part of changes could be reverted.

However, parking in Sistiana mare / Sesljanska plaža is outdated on ortofoto.
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-29 07:00:06+00:00): Many thanks, which parking?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MqBWmn0wfzgHj0gsSgAZgssPPeOukuGr/view?usp=sharing
MitjaJez (2022-11-29 09:01:21+00:00): This one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173584220#map=16/45.7702/13.6253
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-29 09:16:53+00:00): I see you recently updated the parking , it seems to me that OSM and orthophotos are quite matching:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MtV0A2VGoLAsJewcPTYZM0IJTbhNMM2P/view?usp=sharing
jnighan (2024-01-11 21:20:51+00:00): Hi, you changed a few highways to unclassified that should stay residential. Read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification#Residential
toyotagps (2022-12-30 05:38:37+00:00): Добрый день. Для каких целей на каждый подъезд вы поставили адресные теги? Они нужны только если адреса присваиваются не всему зданию, а отдельным подъездам.
Hans Thompson (2022-11-26 00:56:52+00:00): could you provide a bit of a summary of the changes you're making next time?
Skydrops (2022-11-25 22:43:30+00:00): #btcmap
Skydrops (2022-11-25 22:51:24+00:00): Initial add of starting point of Bitcoin Walk (every Saturday at noon).
GinaroZ (2023-02-13 17:49:35+00:00): This has been removed as a meetup point is not suitable for OSM.
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-04 09:48:39+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129691007
eggie (2022-11-26 08:03:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Kijk even hier.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Geoffrey van Heerde (2022-11-27 21:15:33+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Dank voor de duidelijke uitleg.

Groet,
Geoffrey
eggie (2022-11-26 08:06:36+00:00): Feedback..
Tip:
Niet name=  gebruiken bij bomen behalve als een boom echt een eigennaam heeft. 'De boom die alles ziet'. 
Gebruik species:nl=   ...   Voor de Nederlandse naam

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129384846

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-11-26 08:11:13+00:00):  Geoffrey van Heerde,
name=.......... heb ik verwijderd.. species:nl = stond inderdaad al correct vermeld.

Er staan nogal wat bomen en heesters hier met een name tag.. Je zou het nog kunnen aanpassen.

Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
CRCulver (2024-01-24 01:37:24+00:00): What is the source for the cycleway=track on Lemon Avenue in La Mesa? I cannot see that on Bing imagery, even though the bicycle infrastructure in the rest of this area is very clear.
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-05 14:50:59+00:00): FYI, Tulsa city boundary is reporting errors in JOSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/184985

Not sure what changeset caused it.
Baloo Uriza (2022-12-05 23:15:55+00:00): Fully aware of that, it's also an extremely long and twisted boundary to try to sort out and it's been mostly broken since import.
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-05 23:46:35+00:00): In theory fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129760445
Baloo Uriza (2022-12-05 23:56:54+00:00): Maybe for continuity but not for conflation!  At some point someone's gonna have to get some proper legal descriptions for a lot of the boundaries around metro Tulsa and conflate them properly.  Biggest hassle is working out where the line is on the property edges along the street and where the line falls along the center of a road, since it varies, a lot, and with not much consistency.
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-06 00:03:56+00:00): I'll let you sort the exact location of the boundary lines.  In the meantime, at least I've got an intact geometry for data processing ;)
user_12531033 (2022-11-25 23:45:11+00:00): A track relation about train and related information is still under discussion. 
Chinese mappers want to find a way to separate the tracks relation and train relation.
mariotomo (2022-11-28 16:01:33+00:00): hola. gracias por en comentario explícito. quizás quieras entender porque fue necesario intervenir. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129426407
oba510 (2022-11-26 01:40:34+00:00): Hi, you deleted a big chunk of Capistrano/Middle Creek here.  I have personally surveyed most of this (I live nearby, and have done work on a couple of portions of these creeks as part of my job.)  We had to send a camera down into the culvert to figure out where part of the Middle Creek culvert was in Albany because the public records were unreliable.  It looks like you're copying these from the Alameda County Flood Control District data.  The county data is useful but not always accurate - most of the creek culverts were built in the 1800-early 1900s by private landowners and developers who didn't always keep records, so there aren't currently any complete/reliable maps of the current creek networks.  The county data also sometimes conflates ordinary storm drains under the street with actual named creeks.
oba510 (2022-11-26 02:37:51+00:00): To get an idea of how unreliable these public records are take a look at the City of Berkeley's creek data and compare it to the county's: https://data.cityofberkeley.info/browse?q=creek&sortBy=relevance  

I wouldn't really consider either of these datasets reliable enough to import into osm to be honest.
hcourt (2022-11-29 18:30:02+00:00): This is really informative and awesome that you did all this work! Apologies for the delete -- I will put your changes back. I have been using the ACFC data to put culvert/creek info especially where those creeks don't exist at all on OSM, but yours was the first case where the survey was already there.  If you don't mind I'll make sure the creek ways are tagged with source:survey if they weren't already.
hcourt (2022-11-29 19:29:31+00:00): I believe I restored all the surveyed data I had deleted, sorry about this; I'll be sure to double check history in the future and not delete things generally, my mistake.
save2desk (2022-12-08 05:15:39+00:00): Откатил удаление всех народных троп.
keepright! ler (2023-08-22 16:29:55+00:00): What does oneway=lift_gate mean on way 27547919?
Robert Whittaker (2023-08-23 10:12:23+00:00): Looking at aerial imagery, it's presumably an auto-complete error, when I intended to tag it as oneway=yes . Looks like it's already been fixed by someone else though:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27547919 .
eggie (2022-11-26 08:17:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  Je grasveld heb ik even losgemaakt van het fietspad en de kruising gelijk maar aangepast.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2022-11-29 07:30:22+00:00): Hi Gakpevu,
this changeset has created overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129386546

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Kind regards
Guido
emersonveenstra (2022-11-26 18:17:52+00:00): Hi,

Thanks a lot for the contributions recently! Just to be sure, the housenumber is supposed to be "S106", right? So the mailing address would be "S106 School Road", not "106 South School Road"?
Jim Bedient (2022-11-27 05:06:42+00:00): That is a very good question. I'm working from a semi-official map of the Village of Daggett that shows the house numbers as I've put them: 106S, etc., and that's how I understand them to be. But... the county GIS map shows them both ways, or absent. 106S School Rd is plain 106 School Rd in the County GIS. The county GIS also shows, e.g., adjacent properties as 408W Co Rd 358 and W388 County Rd 358. The 911 CAD system for the county shows the same School Rd address above as 106S School Rd also. The Post Office (even though they don't deliver to homes here) uses the 388 W form.  So it's a bit confused. No surprise, the entire address system around here is a zoo.  I'll look into it further and see what I can come up with. Thanks for checking on it!
emersonveenstra (2022-11-29 13:56:40+00:00): Oh wow, yeah that is a mess. Thanks for the explanation, I wouldn't worry about it too much given the state it's in.

One other thing I forgot to note, the street name should be unabbreviated, so "School Road" instead of "School Rd" so that routers can match the street name to the actual street.
marczoutendijk (2022-11-26 18:25:35+00:00): Your changeset comments (a 4-digit number) doesn't make any sense!
Do you have anything better?
Вашите коментари за промените (4-цифрен број) немаат никаква смисла!
Дали имате нешто подобро?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 129246985, 129350496, 129350637, 129350890, 129350951, 129351028, 129351115, 129351336, 129351413, 129351701, 129351849, 129351951, 129352017, 129352289, 129352415, 129352473, 129352572, 129352782, 129353499, 129353875, 129354164.
Emilius123 (2022-11-26 10:54:46+00:00): gg
SomeoneElse (2022-11-26 12:05:30+00:00): @Emilius123 er, what?
cserpell (2022-11-26 13:38:11+00:00): Estimado, colocaste (tal vez sin querer) 4 pistas a Avenida Blanca Estela en dirección oriente, en toda su extensión. Dudo que sea así.
cserpell (2022-11-26 13:39:19+00:00): Igualmente en dirección poniente, al parecer tiene 3 pistas solo hasta Los Pellines.
cserpell (2022-11-27 20:06:43+00:00): Ya lo arreglé.
cartofy (2022-11-26 12:45:53+00:00): Hello. You seem to have added a false hospital of name 'ddddd'. Why is that? What is the point of adding fake data to the map? Please remove the point, or add correct information.
aachso (2022-11-26 02:30:02+00:00): […] Der Gehweg ist nicht Radfahrer frei, aber mehrere Fahrradrouten führen hier "geradeaus".
kechan (2022-11-29 17:55:42+00:00): Not an import
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129387827
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-04 09:49:02+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129691007
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-26 03:10:31+00:00): Each segment removed has long been built over by buildings and roadways, leaving absolutely no trace.  These railways do not exist here.  There is no remains (such as sleepers, rails, etc.) that would indicate a railway exists here in order to meet the definition of "abandoned" or "razed".
Greg_Rose (2022-11-26 23:10:02+00:00): I don't suppose there's any way I can convince you to back this change out and resubmit is there? I have 4 hours of work from yesterday that is currently hung out to dry due to conflicts on the railroad right-of-ways in Owego that you deleted.
I can't get the changes to come back in iD either - possibly because they're in limbo and still trying to submit.
I have no issue with your changes per se, in fact I'm glad you're doing what you're doing - I just made a LOT of road fixes NW of Owego and I'm dreading having to redo everything. Thx in advance...
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-26 23:24:03+00:00): I appreciate your support and completely understand with touching so many things.  Let me see what I can do to undo it and then reapply.

I don't use JOSM, only ID and some other pages, so it might be tricky.  Will get back to you here.
Greg_Rose (2022-11-26 23:25:53+00:00): Thx so much - Hold off on reapplying right away - want to see if the upload that's in a holding pattern will finally take.