piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dino Michelini (2016-08-22 18:39:09+00:00): Cio, ho notato che hai tracciato due track dando presumo dei nomi di "fantasia" perchè nel tag name leggo "Adriano Trail 1" e "Adriano Trail 2". Di solito il nome di una track o path è dato in base al catasto CAI, al nome locale/storico o a quello attribuito da un Ente pubblico (Comune, Comunità montana, Università Agraria, Parco/Riserva, ecc.). Se non si conosce il nome della track o path di solito il tag name non viene messo. La ragione di tutto ciò sta nel fatto che se ad es. devi dare un riferimento geografico per fare sapere dove ti trovi ad un mezzo di soccorso (CFS, CC, 118 o 115), "Adriano Trail 1" ai soccorritori non dice nulla mentre ad es. CAI 113 per loro dice molto (e come avergli dato l'indirizzo di una strada).
mrkmr82 (2016-08-23 08:54:25+00:00): Hai ragione ma il sentiero nn ha nome... è una traccia di solito usata dai cinghiali che un mio amico Adriano appunto... ha pulito, allargato e reso utilizzabile in mtb e di conseguenza a piedi. Cmq adesso provvederò a togliere il nome. Ciao
opendcc (2024-11-15 10:12:30+00:00): Hallo, was meintest Du hier mit entrance=disabled? gesperrt oder für disabled people?
dieterdreist (2024-11-15 10:26:22+00:00): gute Frage nach 9 Jahren, könntest Du evtl. einen Link auf das Objekt posten bzw. sagen, wo genau, dann muss ich es nicht raussuchen?
dieterdreist (2024-11-15 10:28:57+00:00): Habe es doch gefunden, war gar nicht so schwer ;-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3588048319
damit ist wheelchair=yes gemeint, bzw. dürfen da glaube ich nur Menschen mit Gehbehinderung den Aufzug benutzen, war da aber schon Jahre nicht mehr und kann es nicht genau sagen ob das noch aktuell ist und der Aufzug noch funktioniert.
dieterdreist (2024-11-15 10:29:33+00:00): jedenfalls war es damals ein Eingang für Behinderte und nicht ein ungenutzter Eingang
opendcc (2024-11-15 23:08:34+00:00): Danke.
AmyCupcake (2015-06-11 16:16:56+00:00): this edit looks to be strange, I assume it is a new construction, but it nightingale avenue not meant to connect to littlehampton road?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-11 16:35:41+00:00): @Cradamy Looks like new build to me (if you look at the "OS Locator" imagery you can see "Nightingale Avenue" and "Robin Road", and also a "Cuckoo Gate" further to the north).  Obviously it's tricky to guess where new roads are / are going to be - but having a new name in in slightly the wrong place is definitely better than not having it in at all.

I certainly found it tricky getting the hang of joining things to other things when I first started adding stuff to OSM, and its more difficult now when there's more stuff already mapped (like in this case separate footpaths).

@A&A Cars thanks for the update and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
AmyCupcake (2015-06-11 16:37:02+00:00): what is left should be mapped, like an under-construction area
yxoc (2015-07-13 20:29:53+00:00): Re-bonsoir,

les clefs landuse= et amenity= sont en conflit, merci de ne pas les utiliser ensemble sur le meme objet.

-Ralf.
Josef73 (2019-01-27 12:12:33+00:00): Hello, when is hier seson?
HubMiner (2022-02-23 04:42:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211864177/history

Hello, could you review the opening_hours - it contains conflicting rules.
Josef73 (2022-06-17 14:09:46+00:00): Hello, I think was on the website and taked the value for the tag opening_hours. Look here: https://www.capecodfive.com/locations/centerville
HubMiner (2022-10-14 04:42:31+00:00): I updated the hours.
AmyCupcake (2015-06-11 17:12:10+00:00): Ce jardin s'appelle vraiment "jardin?"
naoliv (2015-06-12 17:02:41+00:00): Isso, continua vandalisando e desenhando objetos que você gosta!
Lucas Alves da Silva (2015-06-12 17:16:35+00:00): adoooooooooooooooooooooooro
Swen Wacker (2015-07-13 11:24:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4311417

Das müsste access=no heißen, oder? (steht getrade ac=no)

Gruß

Swen
cassy (2015-07-13 11:34:13+00:00): Ja, stimmt, danke!
DarkSwan_Import (2015-06-11 17:12:24+00:00): Ciao,

su OSM non si dovrebbero usare abbreviazioni (M.te->Monte). Inoltre puoi usare un nome più preciso per i sentieri?
Feuermond16 (2015-06-13 10:27:05+00:00): Könntest Du die Gleise im Bahnhofsbereich anpassen, sodass alle angezeigt werden?
jaakkoh (2016-02-12 20:56:27+00:00): Hi Bryce, Just wanted to ping you that I too have thought about the tagging of pet relief areas at times (since having had a dog from 5 years ago). Thus far the only thing I've done is created one OSM Note to the DCA airport w/ a Q of how to tag these!
I think in the discussion on tagging list (That I found digging into archives) the best option suggest (by you I think) would be amenity=pet_relief_area . What do you think now with a little while from the discssion?
jaakkoh (2016-02-12 20:57:54+00:00): ok, so I just added it to the area in question here.. (Not yet to DCA).
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
MarcoR (2016-01-12 21:27:50+00:00): Ciao!
Via di Ragnaino ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353039980 ) e Via di Torretta ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353039653 ) hanno un numero non intero di corsie; 

Io non so come correggere, ma forse te sì ;)
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
maraf24 (2015-06-11 19:34:01+00:00): building=school
amenity=school
name=nie wyłącznie dużymi literami
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-11 17:54:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 31836630, 31716556, 31715968, 31686967, 31888082, 31834934, 31834773, 31865712, 31742205, 31745386, 31693562, 31861428, 31842527, 31718756, 31873551, 31869181, 31709537, 31709181, 31687976, 31715006, 31870239, 31897214, 31834982, 31685305, 31893474, 31815400, 31666904, 31688415, 31861180, 31869487, 31709846, 31715920, 31869183, 31708243, 31864949, 31840017, 31842925, 31867578, 31713052, 31889594, 31636843, 31713643, 31694021, 31713219, 31835164, 31845967, 31629379, 31687471, 31834846, 31842830, 31836928, 31658930, 31844723, 31635690, 31864933, 31684312, 31717620, 31844355, 31843498, 31842481, 31712081, 31835779, 31694319, 31843648, 31691152.
user_2978640 (2015-06-11 18:30:50+00:00): Haltestelle Pfingstberg berichtigt
user_2978640 (2015-06-11 18:30:37+00:00): Haltestelle Wentorfer Straße berichtigt
changchun_1 (2015-07-15 16:41:56+00:00): Hallo Joachim Müller, der Friedhof https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55837893 geht nicht bis zur Straße sondern endet an der Friedhofsmauer und die Mauer steht nicht mitten auf dem Friedhofsweg. Gruß Matthias
user_2978640 (2015-06-11 18:29:45+00:00): Halltestelle Rathaus Bergedorf hinzugefügt
LouiseLDP (2015-06-11 18:40:07+00:00): nom de rue manquant.
streinger (2015-06-11 20:05:03+00:00): Пригородный это Оренбургская область, Оренбургский район-к городу не относится
SomeoneElse (2015-06-26 13:18:53+00:00): Any reason you changed the name of Milford-on-Sea http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3949124 ?  They clearly self-identify with hyphens http://www.milfordonsea.org.uk/ .
beweta (2015-06-26 15:15:22+00:00): Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milford_on_Sea

and other websites, e.g. http://www.milfordonsea.org/
http://www.visitmilfordonsea.co.uk/

and the welcome sign
http://www.milfordonsea.org/communities/5/004/007/012/115/images/4526813734.swf

don't use haphens.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-26 15:24:57+00:00): Wikipedia says "Civil parish Milford-on-Sea", so that disagrees with you. 

http://www.visitmilfordonsea.co.uk/ just seems to be some third-party spam site.  

The .org looks like a local community site
beweta (2015-06-26 17:10:20+00:00): Wikipedia says "often hyphenated as Milford-on-Sea" or take a look on Google Maps:
https://www.google.de/maps/place/Milford+on+Sea,+Hampshire@50.7252662,-1.582166,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x487383a1ee0f0c23:0x4da93681699d7325

http://www.visitmilfordonsea.co.uk
is made by a Milford on Sea resident.
http://www.visitmilfordonsea.co.uk/contact/4561187094
maciek-szn (2015-06-11 20:43:09+00:00): Zgodnie z uchwałą Rady Miasta Szczecina nr XLIII/910/01 z dnia 24.09.2001 urzędowa nazwa tej ulicy to Andre Citroena - http://bip.um.szczecin.pl/UMSzczecinBIP/files/04CFE52E2C65418FA785164BFA303D0D/910-01.PDF
trigpoint (2015-06-12 08:43:36+00:00): This looks like some sort of personal route, please remember that osm is public and personal data has no place on the map.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-15 14:30:29+00:00): I bumped into this when adding benches in Regents Park.  Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31985404
literan (2015-06-12 11:23:27+00:00): Уважаемый SerPo, прошу вас не ставить на дороги и тропы теги вроде bicycle=yes, foot=no, horse=yes и т.п., т.к. эти теги означают юридическое разрешение езды или неезды по данной дороге (а не физическую возможность). Т.е. они ставятся только если есть соответствующие знаки или иные запреты. По умолчанию в России юридически по любой дороге (кроме автомагистралей и ряда других исключений) можно передвигаться пешком или на велосипеде. Теги сношу.
Socks (2015-06-12 09:23:56+00:00): http://cowleyhistory.org.uk/html/cowley_past_26.html 
The remains of Cowley Airfield is the park behind Herschel Crescent. Roads that were built on the airfield include:

Bartholomew Road (east of Church Cowley school)
Cholsey Close
Burgan Close
Lockheart Crescent
Barns Road (south of Boswell Road)
Kersington Crescent
Amory Close

The Southern part of Oxford Business park South and the land that Tesco/etc are on was also part of the airfield.
Govanus (2015-06-12 18:56:52+00:00): Thank you for the nice information. I am wondering how closely people bound the area to the past when they use it in the present for indirectly linked purposes like:- http://www.oxford.gov.uk/PageRender/decH/GarageLocationsCowleyAirfieldandBarnsRoad.htm ?  Maybe close but the edges might have been conveniently adjusted by officials.  IMHO I've no idea just it would be good to know and have it mapped so people could understand those that still use the term.
dikkeknodel (2018-08-22 12:44:03+00:00): Nope, not a tourism=alpine_hut either... You cannot sleep here, the building is farm. I've changed it to place=farm.
I spotted a lot of tourism=alpine_hut nodes with name "Alp X" in Engiadina Bassa which I think most are just farm. With Alp typically and alpine meadow is meant, most of the time with some kind of building. The farmer takes the animals up the mountain in the summer months. Some of them have rooms/beds for guests, most of them don't though. It seems the tourism=alpine_hut tag is not always well understood by some.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
orson (2015-06-15 01:22:01+00:00): I'm curious why you split this road into two oneway streets and why they have different names?
rasmusv (2015-06-12 13:49:30+00:00): Sletter du ikke lige den vej du har tegnet ud til det gamle færgeleje? Jeg har bevist slettet den fornyligt fordi rampen er blevet demoleret i løbet af maj måned. Mvh Rasmus
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-06-12 14:20:33+00:00): Tak,
er fjernet.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-06-11 22:15:30+00:00): Alting skal tagges som et eller andet.
Dette er en golf bunker
4rch (2015-06-26 18:13:08+00:00): Hello ViriatoLusitano_import, 

please do respect the OSMF guidelines on disputed boundaries: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf

The changes you've made do not comply with the situation on the ground. I'll revert your changes. 

If you have the demand to talk we can have a discussion at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10 or here.
Thanks.

Regards, Arch
5m4u9 (2015-06-12 08:09:39+00:00): Añadí mejoras a esta oficina usando los datos de la web. Podría ser bueno añadir horario de servicio (opening_hours)...
5m4u9 (2015-06-12 06:57:31+00:00): Gracias por mejorar las calles de Cobija en Bolivia.

Recuerda que "Av." delante de nombre de vías no es válido. Lo correcto es "Avenida,Pasaje,Calle".
YoViajo (2015-06-12 09:05:00+00:00): Hola,
utilizo Av. porque es neutral respecto al idioma (español o inglés) y ocupa menos espacio en el nombre. Lo que comentas de "Avenida, Pasaje, Calle" es algo definido por OpenStreetMap o una sugerencia tuya ? Si es algo definido, me gustaría conocer el documento que lo menciona.
5m4u9 (2015-06-12 18:26:42+00:00): Usar el tipo de vía delante del nombre en la etiqueta "name" es el acuerdo que llegamos en la comunidad local.

No se aplica este acuerdo en otros países limítrofes es sólo un acuerdo nacional.

Aparte del acuerdo local, en Bolivia no hay forma estructurada con los datos de saber qué vías son avenidas, calles, pasajes por ello añadiendo antes del nombre hacemos "una clasificación". 

Si en algún momento lograramos encontrar en Bolivia o como acuerdo mundial usar una etiqueta sería sencillo reclasificar haciendo un match con estos textos.

Nuevamente gracias por mapear estos lugares en Bolivia no muy bien mantenidos :-)
5m4u9 (2015-06-14 04:02:38+00:00): es preferible siempre separar el edificio del punto (negocio/oficina). 

Por otro lado, sólo dibujar al edificio no todo el terreno como edificio.
gorogoro (2015-06-18 04:01:31+00:00): De acuerdo, lo tomare en cuenta
bielebog (2018-10-04 22:12:34+00:00): Du hattest hier einen Zweirichtungsradweg ¹ auf der westlichen Straßenseite eingetragen, der in der Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1354525 angezweifelt wird. Selber war ich da auch schon länger nicht, kann mich aber auch an keinen gesonderten Weg erinnern.
bielebog (2018-10-04 22:13:05+00:00): ¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316358511
thetornado76 (2018-10-05 18:57:58+00:00): Den besagten Weg kenne ich nicht. Ich hatte damals nur den surface tag ergänzt. Diesen kann man an der Einmündung Oststraße sehen.
bielebog (2018-10-06 10:22:05+00:00): Okay, naja heute ist ja prima Wetter. Das Ziel der Radtour steht somit fest :)
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-26 14:10:53+00:00): Zapraszam: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=512318#p512318
largescale (2015-09-12 23:24:49+00:00): Not so good :-) Please stick to the Chinese naming convention and dont mix Latin and Chinese names 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China,
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
shravan91 (2015-06-12 08:00:54+00:00): The sources are only:
Bing, Mapbox Satellite, Map Feedback
gileri (2015-06-13 09:13:14+00:00): Bonjour, il ne faut pas ajouter le tag addr:street aux addr:housenumber qui sont déjà présents dans une relation associatedStreet, sinon ça fait des doublons.
Neil Dewhurst (2015-06-13 19:19:11+00:00): Bonjour Gileri,

OK, merci tu tuyaux, je saurai à quoi me tenir à l'avenir.

A bientôt,
Neil Dewhurst - Lyon France
vladvladimirovich (2015-06-12 08:51:40+00:00): 1. Пешеходного перехода между остановками "Дом Печати" на одной стороне и "Дом Печати" на другой стороне нет - перекрыто металлическим ограждением.
2. За домом 96-м проезд указал, правда получился "толстым", научимся.
uks (2015-06-12 10:36:13+00:00): Хорошо, допустим, ты решил удалить landuse=residential с сел и деревень (хоть и не везде это правильно). Но зачем удалять этот тег с районов и микрорайонов города? Он тебе мешает?
maxphizik (2015-06-12 11:10:16+00:00): С микрорайонами промашка вышла. Если ты назад ничего ещё не возвращал, я попробую откатить свои сегодняшние правки и сделать всё поаккуратней.
maxphizik (2015-06-12 12:21:39+00:00): Вроде починил микрорайоны.
maraf24 (2015-06-12 23:22:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115490174
No i tu jest błąd. Bo tu nie ma 4 pasów, są 3.
Do lanes wlicza się tylko pasy o pełnej szerokości, a tu jest pas rowerowy, co dobrze widać w tagowaniu.
Glassman (2015-06-12 15:09:47+00:00): I removed the road. It doesn't exist last time I drove through the park.
Chetan_Gowda (2015-11-13 13:12:03+00:00): Great!! @Glassman.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-12 23:52:40+00:00): Hi - I think something went a bit wrong here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3589607769/history was in the middle of the Atlantic.  I've deleted it; you might want to add it back at the correct location.
abrianto (2015-06-12 11:34:04+00:00): digitasi signet
freeExec (2015-06-15 07:33:40+00:00): Это же были стволовые проезды, а ты всё в сервис превратил.
Firefishy (2015-06-12 13:24:42+00:00): Very nice first edit! Let me know if you need help with anything.
Phoenix_SA (2015-06-12 14:47:55+00:00): Thank you - will do :)
Nakaner (2015-06-19 09:37:14+00:00): Dieser Changset wurde revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32070793.

Wir mappen Fahrstreifen und Radwege nur dann als separate Ways, wenn sie baulich getrennt sind. Bei Fahrstreifen für Kfz ist das ab einer Sperrfläche und bei Verzögerungs-/Beschleunigungsstreifen ggf. schon ab Beginn einer dicken durchgezogenen weißen Linie. Radwege mappen wir nur dann als getrennte Ways, wenn sie baulich von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind (Grünstreifen, Geländer, …). Bordsteine und weiße Linien kann ein Radfahrer problemlos queren (ggf. muss er langsamer fahren), sie sind daher keine bauliche Trennung.

Stehst du in Verbindung mit dem User flaggy?
SomeoneElse (2015-10-19 18:04:00+00:00): The edit here doesn't match my recollection of the A15 here (albeit from a while ago, in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9714835 ). There are not three parallel roads forming the A15, only 1, which in places has more that one lane.

You've broken the link to the bridleway too.  I'd suggest that this changeset is reverted and the lanes detail is added to "lanes" tags.

Fantasy edits like this are extremely demotivating - it's one of the reasons why I no longer survey much in Lincolnshire.  Before any positive mapping contribution can be made there's an awful lot of treacle to wade through - previous garbage to remove.

If you're going to map lane detail (which is great!) please do map lane detail as lanes, not as parallel roads.  Please also take care not to break existing map connectivity.

If you think that this advice is incorrect, and you think that mapping lanes as parallel roads is a good idea, I'd strongly suggest discussing it on the talk-gb list to get a feeling for what other mappers think about the issue.
GerdP (2015-11-01 20:48:43+00:00): please review: is it okay to change 
highway=ex_bus_stop to
abandoned:highway=bus_stop ?
The tag is only used 3 times, e.g. here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393422352
Richard Mann (2015-11-01 22:01:15+00:00): Happy for you to update the tag - it was just edited to suppress it. 

However it may be worth noting that the Frideswide Square scheme will be complete in a month or two, at which point I'll delete it or move it back to the main square.
GerdP (2015-11-02 10:32:02+00:00): okay, here is my change:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35030445
drnoble (2015-06-13 09:51:57+00:00): Construction might be complete, but the station doesn't open for another 2-3 months. Not sure if it should be marked as a station yet?
NorthBeric (2015-06-13 14:43:04+00:00): I thought about putting '(opens Sept 2015)' as a suffix to the name, but it didn't look right, and wasn't the correct name tag. I think people may be looking for the stations before the line opens, and they can see them on the ground. Happy enough if you want to change it back, it's just my view.
Rostranimin (2015-06-13 15:59:30+00:00): Both points of view seem really valid...  ...if pushed I'd come down on the side of them being mapped before open. After all, the presence of a station doesn't necessarily imply that a train can be caught there. So long as an ordinary person would look at what's on the ground and would see a completed station. Actually the world at large probably won't care... and it is quite nice to see them mapped...
drnoble (2015-06-13 18:05:01+00:00): I have added start_dates for the railway relation and all the stations.

I'm not sure whether they should be rendered or not, but thought I would ask the question
Plop76 (2015-07-12 20:59:12+00:00): Salut,

Officiellement je ne crois pas que la voie sur berge soit interdite aux vélos. Il y a un panneau d'interdiction pour les cyclomoteurs, mais rien pour les vélos et piétons.
Eric S (2015-07-12 21:29:23+00:00): Ce n'est peut-être pas matérialisé à l'entrée néanmoins je pense que c'est le cas. On peut voir des panneaux d'interdiction pour les piétons aux accès intermédiaires.
Plop76 (2015-07-12 21:46:06+00:00): J'ai vu un panneau interdit aux piétons au niveau de l'accès pompier, mais il y en a aussi au niveau des différents escaliers ?

En tout cas pour les vélos il n'y a rien nulle part.
Plop76 (2015-07-18 19:00:58+00:00): J'ai été voir les différents accès, et à part les accès pompiers interdits à tout le monde, il n'y a pas d'interdiction piéton. Il y a une bande (peu visible) sur la gauche de la voie pour les piétons.
de vries (2017-06-27 09:33:06+00:00): Please don't merge addresses with buildings, thanks
rw__ (2015-06-12 14:59:59+00:00): Hi DAC LLM, Thanks for your interest in OpenStreetMap.  The business that you placed in Winnipeg appears problematic. It's at a road junction, rather than in a retail, like your other edits.  Let me know if you need help to improve it.
danbjoseph (2021-11-02 00:40:21+00:00): why did you add numbers to these buildings in the "name" field?
proper use of "name" is described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
maraf24 (2015-06-12 23:34:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217553577
No i dlaczego z turn:lanes zniknął pas rowerowy na wprost ?
LeoKutno (2015-06-13 06:21:33+00:00): Ponieważ do lanes nie wlicza się pasów rowerowych, także nie może być większej ilości pasów ruchów niż ogólna ilość pasów.
maraf24 (2015-06-13 13:05:51+00:00): Nie zrozumiałeś wiki.
Do "lanes" się nie wlicza.  
Do "turn:lanes" się wlicza. To nie jest to samo lanes, to jest :lanes, ze znakiem na ":" na początku. Inna propozycja, inne wiki, inne zasady.
Popraw to.
EdLoach (2015-09-17 08:00:57+00:00): I don't suppose you know whether the 'Lloyds TSB' in this changeset became a Lloyds or a TSB after the two split?
MapperTwo (2015-09-17 08:17:46+00:00): Can't visualise the name, didn't even know they had split! However I remember it's primarily green livery, and a web search of images for the two show Lloyds=Green, TSB=blue
EdLoach (2015-09-17 08:44:41+00:00): I just noticed how well the street was mapped, and was surprised that the bank still had the old name (I was a customer at another branch, so perhaps more aware of the split). I realise now it was added about 5 years ago and was only moved slightly 2 months ago. Thanks.
saintam1 (2015-06-12 22:52:04+00:00): Привет,

Какъв е пълният адрес? Номерата, които сте въвели, се отнасят за блоковете (например блок номер 22) или са номерата на улиците (например улица Васил Левски номер 22)?
muralito (2015-06-12 20:44:49+00:00): Tendras que poner los Viyetes en otro lado.
freeExec (2015-06-15 07:44:01+00:00): Зачем ты портишь поля и привязываешь их к дорогам?