piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iwhs (2019-05-16 16:43:22+00:00): Hi. This changeset has disconnected Stower Place from Perowne Way. It has also made a gap here in the Yar River Trail.  I don't think that the pavements here are in fact separate from the road??? If there isn't a grass verge, you shouldnt show the pavement separately. Cheers,
user_4081914 (2019-05-17 19:51:03+00:00): Will be abroad for a while. Just change it as you wish
user_4081914 (2019-05-18 04:43:41+00:00): Just bear in mind that when deleting footways that people have been put by roads that perhaps you think that just a sidewalk is sufficient - and technically that may be correct - it may have been done like this for a reason. I am abroad at the moment and walking miles using routing apps with a walking/avoid roads function. Thank god for the people who have included that bit of extra footway linking walking routes. Also when walking through towns it is not helpful to be told by the app to enter roundabouts full of traffic when there is a footway available. Also short sections of footway by roads linking pedestrian crossings have been invaluable for walking around strange cities. I have also been cursing people who have not routed footways though large pedestrian areas as routing becomes very silly. There are also other odd things - you may have noticed I have included a short section of footway from Sandown towards Brading with a noexit tag at the end. This enables you to see that walking that side of the road is not a thing you want to do.
Yohn79 (2019-03-04 20:46:51+00:00): Tutaj brakuje znaczników:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6314506782
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6314506781
mariotomo (2020-12-04 00:40:30+00:00): Hola Alvarado.  quieres revisar lo que hiciste aquí?  dices "corrigiendo características políticas", y edits un edificio (que hiciste triangular) y un área residencial gigante en conflicto con 'orchard'.  si quieres lo revisas, gracias.
mariotomo (2020-12-04 01:14:19+00:00): ah, lo he visto, estabas con errores de ArielRod y los YouthMappers.  bueno, un poco lo mejoraste, pero dejaste el trabajo a media.
Alvarado2510 (2021-01-21 23:24:06+00:00): Bueno gracias a ti conocí las categorías de place, para lugares según su población, tuve que corregir prácticamente un año de trabajo voluntario, pero si quedo bien, la verdad wiki es una pagina muy informativa y ayuda enormemente a resolver nuestros errores.
marczoutendijk (2019-03-04 13:35:08+00:00): I have solved this problem.
Supaplex (2019-04-07 13:50:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67742863 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppetry in the USA; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2565
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67742863 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppetry in the USA; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2565
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67742863 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppetry in the USA; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2565
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67742863 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppetry in the USA; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2565
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67742863 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppetry in the USA; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2565
VincentVE (2019-09-07 11:59:38+00:00): (Re-)edited to current situation; Now also visible via AIV most recent aerial imagery (2019, available in all OSM editors): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74203862 
see also: 
https://www.oosterweelverbinding.be/nieuws/groot-schijn-mondt-rechtstreeks-uit-het-albertkanaal
Marivet (2019-03-03 18:27:44+00:00): Hola Joaquín
Esta plaza no se ve en el satélite. Estás seguro que existe?
Joaquín Zamora Manríquez (2019-03-03 18:37:25+00:00): Desde el satélite no se ve porque no está actualizado, pero tomé como guía el mapa oficial de la Municipalidad de Maipú y ahí aparece. Te dejo el link para que puedas corroborarlo de primera mano.
https://sitma.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=ef8b178b0000496bab6bbc32ca1fb9b6
felipeeugenio (2019-03-03 19:39:06+00:00): Hola Joaquín.
La foto que se ve es de noviembre de 2018. Construyeron la plaza durante el verano? Que esté proyectada la plaza no significa que haya que dibujarla. Solo se dibuja lo que hay en terreno.
gracias
Joaquín Zamora Manríquez (2019-03-05 14:02:44+00:00): Fui a verificar en persona para comparar con la foto, porque en ella se puede ver el parque y por visión de Google Maps se veía un parque pero muy descuidado. Me encontré con que el estado actual lamentablemente es de vertedero, completamente lleno de basura, por lo que confirmo que les confirmo que ya no se podría considerar plaza el lugar.
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-07 10:49:08+00:00): Hi houtari, please write tourism=hotel.
Thanks, Alex
houtari (2019-03-07 22:01:42+00:00): Hello! Thanks for correcting. I went on instinct on this one. Once again my instinct was wrong. :-/
Matthew Darwin (2019-03-04 16:42:38+00:00): Hi, I see you split Macmillan Lane in two parts.  I have update the road name and number of lanes.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67773667
sheldonelectric (2020-07-19 16:46:33+00:00): Πολύγλωσσο όνομα είναι τον int_name που φαίνεται στη ταμπέλα, κι όχι τα greeklish που έβαλες εσύ...
LorenzoPesci (2019-03-04 08:58:02+00:00): Questo tratto NON è trunk ma primary poiché non c'è spartitraffico centrale
vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-20 09:09:18+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1819250 ?
MKnight (2019-03-04 12:52:53+00:00): Moin,

Eigenschaften an Umrisse zu kleben ist nicht immer richtig.

2 Beispiele:
- Das Restaurant zur Sonne in Nohra befindet sich meines Wissens nicht im kompletten Haus, sondern nur im Erdgeschoss.
- Hausnummer 1 in Nohra ist ein gewöhnliches Wohnhaus und kein amenity mit Namen.
MKnight (2019-03-04 12:53:57+00:00): Nachtrag: Ansonsten excellente Arbeit!
felf (2019-03-04 14:18:28+00:00): Danke für die Blumen und den Tipp. Ich war mir in der Tat nicht sicher, wann ich welche Art von Tagging nutzen soll. Ich habe vor allem dann einen eigenen Knoten benutzt, wenn das Gebäude ziemlich groß ist (# 66a) oder mehrere Dinge auf einmal stehen, z.B. der Friseur samt DHL-Shop in # 76. Außerdem wird kein Icon angezeigt, wenn man keinen separaten Knoten benutzt(?).

Haus # 1 war mir beim Review auch aufgefallen (amenity=painter passte sowieso nicht, aber es gibt dort noch eine Tier(futter)handlung). Ich wollte nochmal vorbei schauen auf der Wegfahrt, aber hab's dummerweise vergessen und bis ich wieder vorbei komme, vergehen noch einige Wochen. :/
MKnight (2019-03-04 15:10:14+00:00): Moin,

ich habe die Nummer 1 jetzt (in cs67770636) rückgängig gemacht.

Der Tierfutterladen ist ein Haus weiter nördlich, da habe ich jetzt aber nichts gemacht.

Wann und auf welchen Zoomstufen Icons gemalt werden und wann nicht, weiss ich nicht genau, es gibt aber Icons auch auf Flächen, kann man bspw. an der Kirche sehen.
Allerdings: wir setzen auch nicht extra Nodes, damit Icons in "der Karte" zu sehen sind, da es "die Karte" nicht gibt. osm.org rendert dies eine andere auf OSM basierende Karte rendert jenes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-03 17:32:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 67741182, 67741205, 67741217, 67741234, 67741245, 67741265, 67741282, 67741292, 67741306, 67741346.
dpolovinkin (2025-04-05 14:20:59+00:00): добрый день, конечно добавления уже старые, но удивило что вы на очевидно здания где не один этаж (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674272761 или https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674272764) тогда поставили тэг building:levels=1, непонятно зачем( теперь попробуй все их отыщи))
dpolovinkin (2025-04-05 14:21:54+00:00): аа, ваш блок тогда как раз за это был...
user_6110846 (2019-03-15 07:19:17+00:00): revert
user_6110846 (2019-03-15 09:14:21+00:00): The main thing about this project is the local name.
The Russian name has no relation to the principle of on ground and has never had
The Russian name Pripyat has no relation to the local name.
Your words that the Russian name is a local name is delusional and only confirms that you don’t know the territory at all, that you map it by copying information from the Internet
I used to catch you that they used the Belarusian cadastre which did not grant a license to use the information in the openstreetmap
user_6110846 (2019-03-15 09:18:16+00:00): thank you for the wars of redagings (destruction of confirmed information) and insults of Ukrainians help us to create a lock on your account

So go on.
yaugenka (2019-03-15 19:21:18+00:00): you have not provided any evidence for the new names. so your edits are treated as vandalism and will be reverted. continue reverting and you will be get banned first.
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 06:30:27+00:00): Prypiat is in the English Wikipedia is also in the Google search results
French card is a confirmation for the French language
on the rest of the languages ​​there is confirmation in the appropriate wikipedia
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 06:49:01+00:00): about the evidence you write a blatant lie
All translations are in Wikipedia or on the Internet.
you have no authority at all to prohibit translation from wikipedia or the Prypiat search results
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 07:19:45+00:00): This is sufficient with confirmation
  International Congress 
https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=QmNb6T0oenoC&pg=PA4023&lpg=PA4023&dq=prypiat+river&source=bl&ots=JDoa-WDixp&sig=ACfU3U3sOhdaKasjszJmne4ToLaj_oragQ&hl=uk&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXxbPvjIbhAhUk_CoKHfJ9DmU4ChDoATABegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=prypiat%20river&f=false

https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=ppdmCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA216&dq=prypiat+river&hl=uk&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwji3eufjYbhAhXwsYsKHfUlBYcQ6AEISTAE#v=onepage&q=prypiat%20river&f=false

https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=GDmX5XKkQCcC&pg=PT513&dq=prypiat+river&hl=uk&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_lpTLjYbhAhVKpIsKHZOFAFQ4ChDoAQgtMAE#v=onepage&q=prypiat%20river&f=false
yaugenka (2019-03-16 09:52:38+00:00): Ok. Let'a analyse your changes one by one.
1. you removed name:en=Pripyat␣River tag at all - no comments. pure vandalism.
2. you reverted name:it=Pryp'jat' to Pryp"jat' - I corrected a typo mistake in here and you reverted the correction. so no comments. pure vandalism.
3. you changed name:no=Prypjats to Pripjat
and alt_name:no=Prypjat;Pripjat to Prypjat␣Prypjats - can you provide grounds for this change?
BTW the usage of space symbol for separating alt names contradicts the osm wiki. semecolon should be used instead.
4. you reverted name:pt=Rio␣Pripiat to 	Rio␣Prípiat - I corrected a typo mistake in here and you reverted the correction. so no comments. pure vandalism.
5. you removed name:sv=Prypjat at all - no comments. pure vandalism.
you also changed alt_name:sv=Prypjats to Prypjat i.e. you removed another valid name here - no comments. pure vandalism.
6. you changed name:vi=Sông␣Prypiat to Sông␣Pripyat - can you provide grounds for this change?
7. you added Prypiats to alt_name:fr - it is ok with me to it in alt_names.
8. you added alt_name:nl=Prypjats - it is ok with me to it in alt_names.
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 10:31:45+00:00): the Italian name is correct; see the Italian Wikipedia and find in the Italian Wikipedia the rules for recording the names of the Ukrainian language in Italian letters
UKRAINIAN apostrophe in the Italian language is "
Italian uses a 1960s system known as BGN/PCGN**	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanization_of_Ukrainian
to write objects of Ukrainian geography
There is a resolution of the Italian Wikipedia community
yaugenka (2019-03-16 10:40:33+00:00): ok this point is accepted. what about the rest?
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 11:00:16+00:00): name:pt Rio Prypiat 
https://outrosentidoblog.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/prypiat-a-cidade-fantasma/

https://pt.euronews.com/2016/04/22/kiev-um-lago-de-peixe-radioativo

https://medium.com/polyteck/radia%C3%A7%C3%A3o-impede-que-as-florestas-na-zona-de-exclus%C3%A3o-de-chernobyl-se-decomponham-normalmente-8d3fd87696cb

http://faunacantabrica.blogspot.com/2016/07/bielorrusia-4-parte-rio-prypiat.html

(site from Brasil ) https://www.brasil247.com/pt/colunistas/heliorocha/381819/Vale-uma-Chernobyl-para-chamar-de-nossa.htm
yaugenka (2019-03-16 11:15:23+00:00): First of all, how does this explain your reverting of typo correction in point 4? Secondly, the mentions of "Rio Prypiat" in portuguese personal blogs and websites only let you add it to "alt_name", but do not establish it as the most commonly used name for the "name" tag.
user_6110846 (2019-03-16 11:54:23+00:00): often used is nonsense

A few confirmations are enough
Read in the middle of the discussion the text of the DWG spokesperson about Kyiv
The predecessor dwg only writes about the evidence and nothing about the quantity
You can return the Russian fake violating the rule ONLY in type = watwerway

In Ukraine, I wrote, now I am writing and I will write in the future: the Ukrainian community does not use at all the translation in the basis of which the Russian name
I’ll never see the translation of the name created on the basis of the Russian name in Ukraine.
All returns return on the basis of the Russian name for us is vandalism and we clean them constantly

often used is nonsense

A few confirmations are enough
Read in the middle of the discussion the text of the DWG spokesperson about Kyiv
The predecessor dwg only writes about the evidence and nothing about the quantity
You can return the Russian fake violating the rule ONLY in type = watwerway

In Ukraine, I wrote, now I am writing and I will write in the future: the Ukrainian community does not use at all the translation in the basis of which the Russian name
I’ll never see the translation of the name created on the basis of the Russian name in Ukraine.
All returns return on the basis of the Russian name for us is vandalism and we clean them constantly

Ukraine is a territory without translations, based on the Russian name
Ukraine is a translation territory based on a Ukrainian name.
Ві waste time wasting demands to return Russian fakes
Russian fakes do not have any fault for Ukraine
I am ready for the purpose of 2019 to lead a discussion with you, but the victory will be mine, that is, real Ukrainian or Belarusian names.
yaugenka (2019-03-16 16:14:58+00:00): The river is international, so the frequence of usage is the only criterion for putting a name into "name" tag in the waterway relation.
I see that you have partially restored your last revert. I have applied to following corrections to that:
1. restored alt_name:sv=Prypjats
2. restored "Rio Pripiat" in the name:pt tag because this name is the most frequently used one.
3. restored "Sông␣Pripyat" in name:vi because that was the original name in that tag and it is the most common one.

With regards to the waterway ways, I completely agree with you that the variant which resembles the local name should be put into the "name" tag (I usually do that on other rivers as well) but only if there is an evidence of that variant in foreign publications. The other variants should be placed into alt_names in this case (not into the old_names). I have just corrected this in here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68207102
BTW "Prypiats" which you put into the name:fr resembles Belarusian more than Ukrainian. "Pripiat" or language neutral "Pripet" is more appropriate for Ukrainian territory in my mind.
user_1470980 (2019-03-04 23:06:34+00:00): folgt. #67740876
UTF-8 (2021-03-24 18:04:06+00:00): Ich habe die hier als 'Pilzweg' und 'Jagdpfad' benannten Wege besichtigt, konnte jedoch keinen Namen vor Ort feststellen. Da es eher Trampelpfade sind, gehe ich auch davon aus, dass es keinen Namen gibt. Ich würde die Namen dann demnächst entfernen. Hast Du Informationen, die dem Wiedersprechen?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-05 16:12:48+00:00): note that shop=bakery is for existing bakery shop, not ruins of ancient one
David Crochet (2019-03-03 19:53:04+00:00): Bonjour. Pourriez-vous éviter de faire rejoindre les frontières des zones aux linéaire des voies pour s’approcher au mieux de la réalité. Merci
AjBelnuovo (2019-03-04 02:30:27+00:00): Clayton , a rua Outono não é a outra que já estava nomeada ?
Clayton Venute (2019-03-04 02:35:25+00:00): Também, ela começava na rua do verão, subia até a torre e descia fechando o quarteirão, hoje só existe uma trilha ligando as partes
AjBelnuovo (2019-03-04 02:41:01+00:00): Ok.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-14 15:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72236359 where the changeset comment is: Reverting likely spam, no response from user questions after a week.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-14 15:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72236387 where the changeset comment is: Reverting likely spam, no response from user questions after a week.
Chris Fleming (2019-03-08 21:36:26+00:00): Cheers!
VA00 (2019-08-11 16:11:56+00:00): Na moście stoi tabliczka ,,Potok Jama''. Skąd nazwa ,,Skomielnianka''?
SomeoneElse (2019-03-03 20:37:35+00:00): Aborted changeset caused by tag entry of "demolished:man_made" failing in Firefox on Windows.
Nakaner (2019-05-09 22:41:42+00:00): Hallo,

das Signal Nr. 135 am Kronenplatz sieht nicht ganz korrekt aus. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6314835637#map=19/49.00910/8.41022

Ich komme zwar kaum noch dorthin (kein Student mehr), aber seiner Position nach dürfte es mitten auf der Fahrbahn stehen. Wir mappen Signale auf das Gleis, nicht daneben.

Korrigierst du das bitte?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Aleksa M (2019-03-03 23:19:38+00:00): Please don't put name:cnr to tags in Serbia, because we don't recognise Montenegrin language and for us it's Serbian language. According to linguists, Montenegrin language doesn't exist. It was created artificially, just for political purposes. Once again, I will remove that tag and please don't put it back again.
Aleksa M (2019-03-03 23:21:46+00:00): Also, every Montenegrin who needs to find this embassy will find it by name:sr-Latn tag.
Aleksa M (2019-03-03 23:25:12+00:00): Serbian in Serbia and Serbian in Montenegro are just like British and American English. They're nearly 90% same.
Anton Khorev (2019-03-05 20:31:10+00:00): Можете прокомментировать ваши правки про выравниваниям, особенно насчёт того, что написано про треки?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=740603#p740603
maus (snekin) (2019-03-06 10:12:25+00:00): треки не панацея. особенно учитывая их происхождение. на них можно ориентироваться только как на индикатор смещения. ТОЧНО привязать по ним не выйдет. в центре ПОЧТИ всё смещено на несколько метров к востоку и незначительно к северу. по набережным(и не только) многие оси дорог смещены к тротуару, чаще к зданиям иногда к береговой линии. 

поскольку сейчас буду добавлять деревья, такое смещение не приемлемо - они будут оказываться либо в зданиях, либо посреди проезжей части, а то и в воде.

что ещё интересует?
maus (snekin) (2019-03-15 16:26:44+00:00): хорев, хватит чушь нести на форуме. ты реально не понимаешь, что невозможно такой сложный объект, как центр Питера разом смещать.
maus (snekin) (2019-03-15 16:34:12+00:00): у меня была необходимость в Екатерининском канале поэтому на нём в первую очередь и сосредоточился. в чате я предупреждал об этом и сказал, что сразу, после выверки на земле либо сам откачу - либо возникнет неприемлемое смеение, либо высчитаю корректировку и уже далее по ней всё буду выправлять, либо доведу до ума затронутые кварталы и приведу дороги к ощему знаменателю между выправленным и не выправленным. последний вариант и был реализован, поскольку на земле точность подтвердилась и погрешность не превысила полуметра. для меня важно всё. и я выправляю и смещение относительно реального расположения и уточняю геометрию.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-03 20:40:02+00:00): Hi dstong and welcome to OSM!

I see you're interested in adding golf features to the map, which is great.

Rather than using the tag for a park for these features, which has a different meaning in OSM, try checking out the wide variety of golf tags that can be found by searching in the iD editor (the one you used to make this edit)

For your reference:
Golf course features: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Details_within_a_golf_course
Parks:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Happy mapping :)
pio2_122 (2019-03-04 13:03:24+00:00): Fundamenty budynku oznaczyłeś jako zbiornik wody :/ Poprawiłem to.

Mógłbyś weryfikować z różnych źródeł mapowane rzeczy (np. zdjęcie lotnicze + podkład z budynkami, wyszukanie informacji w internecie, itd.)? Ja, jeśli nie mam potwierdzenia, unikam mapowania niejednoznacznych rzeczy.

Ogólnie, to tylko z tym był problem, reszta jest dobra.
Ten komentarz nie jest żadnym atakiem - to przyjazne zwrócenie uwagi :)
JulesGabrielVerne (2019-03-04 14:35:18+00:00): Nie traktuję tego jako atak. Nasza internetowa współpraca układa się dobrze :) ostatnio zaaktualizowano zdjęcia satelitarne i czasami odnoszę się do nich jak do prawdy objawionej, ale rzeczywiście czasami mogą wkraść się błędy. Dzięki za poprawki. W końcu robimy to dla wspólnego dobra :)
pio2_122 (2019-03-04 14:55:47+00:00): Dzięki za miłą odpowiedź! Niestety nie wszyscy są tacy (na szczęście to tylko pojedyncze incydenty).

Otóż to wzajemna współpraca i pomoc to podstawa :)
Ja też pewnie popełniam błędy i ktoś je poprawia lub sam je później znajduję :P
JulesGabrielVerne (2019-03-04 15:03:13+00:00): A z ciekawości zapytam, jak poznałeś że to jest budynek a nie woda? :)
pio2_122 (2019-03-04 15:26:22+00:00): Wiedziałem, że coś tam budują, więc postanowiłem to sprawdzić.
Na domyślnie dodanym w JOSM'ie podkładzie z budynkami "Krajowa Integracja Ewidencji Gruntów: Budynki" zauważyłem obrys budynku idealnie pokrywający się z tą "dziurą-stawem" - takie to proste :D
jacobi_albert (2019-03-03 21:16:12+00:00): The text with this change (Court yard/garden...) is incorrect but can't determine how to edit it.
gurglypipe (2019-03-04 09:27:38+00:00): Hey, the location looks good to me (you can search OpenStreetMap using coordinates; just paste them into the search box). I’ve tweaked the tagging slightly in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67759817, since there’s an agreed tag for large, notable boulders.
czubi (2019-06-04 09:19:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674433214

Das ist mit Sicherheit kein footway