piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fkv (2016-02-20 22:29:21+00:00): Die Höhe mit 4xx statt 2xx m war ein offenkundiger Tippfehler von mir. Aber die Stelle war sicher richtig, westlich von der Straße ist ein Erdwulst, der ist der höchste Punkt. Das sieht man auch im Bgld-GIS (http://geodaten.bgld.gv.at/de/kartendienste-fachdaten/kartendienste.html -> Topokarte -> Rasterwert abfragen). Da komme ich auf 270,51 m bei BMN ca. 783283/318180. Das ist etwas höher als die in der ÖK am Ostrand der Straße eingezeichnete Kote 270. An deinen Koordinaten kommt das Bgld-GIS auf ca. 269 m.
Jean Passepartout (2017-04-17 20:25:10+00:00): Hello Jack,
I noticed that 3 years ago you added Paushiyacu in Ecuador (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2766578730), but it has a tag of place=San Antonio (instead of place = hamlet/city/village/etc.).  Could you fix the place tag?  Thanks and Happy Mapping!
GerdP (2015-11-23 20:59:01+00:00): Hallo!
Was könnte mit landuse=594 gemeint sein ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271716269
Markus Olderdissen (2015-11-27 14:03:09+00:00): frag die anderen, nich mich, ich spiele nicht mehr mit
GerdP (2015-11-27 14:09:18+00:00): kein Problem, ich lösche den Weg einfach
Allroads (2017-01-29 19:25:40+00:00): twee keer Windraak 31 restaurant, je bent er vast bekend.
Martin Borsje (2017-01-29 19:31:47+00:00): Heb de adrestags van het gebouw gehaald en tevens de syntax van de openingsuren aangepast (openingstijden zelf niet gecheckt :-))
VitalieS (2020-10-13 19:19:40+00:00): Bună. Puteți să ne confirmați ce reprezintă Зеленого хозяйства? E o asociație? O întreprindere? Clădirea în care a fost adăugată nu pare să coincidă cu datele aeriene.
Nakaner (2015-04-07 09:08:58+00:00): Ist das ein deutsches Signal oder ein niederländisches Signal? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2768174312/history Falls deutsch, bitte umtaggen. Danke.
rurseekatze (2015-04-07 13:03:33+00:00): Habe das Signal auf das neue Schema umgestellt.
BikePC (2017-07-16 20:10:58+00:00): Maxime, are you sure this way is a cycleway?
Aerial imagery suggests a normal paved road (D15?). Are traffic-signs present and do you have a photo maybe?
Polarbear (2015-01-23 20:12:33+00:00): Bitte keine separat gemappten Rad/Fußwege löschen, insbesondere wenn sie wie hier baulich durch die Straßenbahn getrennt sind:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38747941/history
aharvey (2017-10-07 07:07:54+00:00): Any reason why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271972464 is bicycle=designated? I couldn't find any signage or markings indicating that.
os-emmer (2023-12-09 19:13:18+00:00): Hallo be-ju,
du hast hier eine recht fragwürdig anmutende Relation angelegt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2226483
Was genau wolltest du damit bezwecken? Ich habe den Eindruck, da ist was schief gelaufen, vielleicht überesehe ich aber auch etwas.
os-emmer (2023-12-12 18:34:15+00:00): Ich habe zu dem Thema mal einen Hinweis aufgemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4025452
philippec (2019-07-24 11:31:36+00:00): Is WP1 on the correct place ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.23839127805559&lng=2.9378010702778283&z=17&pKey=CCm5y0DF2gtOHZxKkKQqGQ&focus=photo&menu=false&x=0.5000641907637471&y=0.46527676598351325&zoom=0
ypid (2015-04-30 14:50:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2769456654/history

Ich habe die Öffnungszeiten von „Montag-Donnerstag 10.00-12.00 u. 16.00-18.00 Uebrige Zeit nach telefonischer Vereinbarung“ in „Mo-Th 10:00-12:00,16:00-18:00 || "nach telefonischer Vereinbarung"“ korrigiert.
20180911 (2021-03-17 12:21:04+00:00): Knoten 2770347280 ist bestimmt keine Stromrichterstation für Hochspannungsgleichstromübertragung (substation=converter), sondern eher substation=minor_distribution
vogelfreier (2021-10-01 06:18:23+00:00): wurde bereits korrigiert
Constable (2017-01-29 16:10:59+00:00): hey sir, what's the real name of this trail? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272123930#map=18/-33.98410/18.95977&layers=N
I seriuosly douts its name is "Trail"
thanks
Vaxe (2015-01-25 22:04:12+00:00): Use name tag for the actual name of the entity (what you can see on it or commonly known names (such as the names of roads))

If you want something deleted, you may do it yourself or add a note to the map.

I shall remove it as it does indeed seem useless.
Kengaru (2017-02-27 08:27:05+00:00): Это верная адресация? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2771692363
GerdP (2015-10-07 19:37:20+00:00): please review
this change produced some nodes
with wall=yes .
What does highway="no_parking_1-15"
mean?
fkv (2018-12-18 01:29:54+00:00): Was haben Autobahnen, Eisenbahnen, Bäche und ein Volksfestplatz mit einer Grenzkorrektur zu tun?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-02 22:29:39+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1255911 ?
Pieren (2015-02-16 10:46:58+00:00): Hi, could you explain the way id=272431649  and it's "barrier=ohm:military:wireObstacle" ? Even after reading the wiki about this tag, it's unclear if the barrier still exists on the ground or if it is just historical.
SKald (2015-02-16 13:53:31+00:00): The barrier still exists on the ground. At least it did last summer, when we did a guided tour to the artillery bunkers nearby. It is not in use by the military anymore (since the late 90s) as defensive structure, but as its quite hard to remove (the barbed wire grew together with trees and bushes), still used for training purposes.
fkv (2017-01-20 13:52:18+00:00): I can confirm its existence, but the tag value is strange (camelCase, unknown "ohm" prefix), and this is the only occurrence of that tag. See http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=barbed_wire#values for possible alternatives. Something like military=wire_obstacle would also be fine. In any case, we need to add area=yes, because area=no is implied for any kind of fence-like barriers.
muralito (2016-03-01 17:55:50+00:00): ¿En vez de natural=Warnes quisiste poner name=Warnes?
AgusQui (2016-03-01 19:12:21+00:00): Ups! Corregido
whb (2018-05-13 12:03:25+00:00): Sicher, dass der Weg hier gesperrt ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1816019885
Immerhin laufen dort zwei Wanderwege drüber.
whb (2018-05-13 12:06:45+00:00): Was sollen diese access=no hier bedeuten?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2774512078
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2745330503
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1816019672
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-06 02:56:58+00:00): I just deleted the object (that's not a water body) based on Bing Aerial Imagery
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-06 02:58:22+00:00): I just deleted the object (that's not a water body) based on Bing Aerial Imagery
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:33:53+00:00): Hi Paul_012. Your edit looks awesome, but I delete water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/272525310) due #AtlasChecks #LineCrossingWaterBodyCheck #maproulette data doesn’t exist on imagery. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142920113). Thank you.
Jobje (2021-10-31 22:52:39+00:00): Rot op man! De hele zooi zit  9g dicht!
richardbrinkman (2021-11-02 12:48:23+00:00): Ik begrijp jouw commentaar niet. Ook ben ik niet gediend van je omgangsvorm.
eggie (2020-09-18 05:57:10+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:36+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 14:35:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2776379998/history has access:foot = private that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:32+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
JasperLK (2015-04-02 16:09:29+00:00): Das Welterbeband in Hildesheim geht nicht in der Judenstraße entlang. Sondern den Hoher Weg bis zur Rathausstraße.
Warin61 (2017-03-23 22:49:14+00:00): Why layer=1 for these buildings? 

At the moment relationship 6592787 has 3 of these buildings .. all layer=1 ... and they over lap one another ... so in order to 'fix' the problem I'd like to understand the use of the layer tag here.
Leon K (2017-03-23 23:01:33+00:00): Hi, not sure about the layer tag to be honest, I can't remember a specific reason for it.  The reason for the three spearate parts is they are different heights and colours.  It's part of the 3d tagging.   
The layer isn't associated with that but might be because of the underground car park.
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-25 10:40:17+00:00): Better to model the different chunks as building:part I reckon; and the building 'footprint' as a building.

A bit hard to get them all in a relation properly with ID; dunno about other editors
Warin61 (2017-03-25 11:01:36+00:00): Interesting and dynamic architecture is hard to map... particularly from satellite imagery! :) Don't think any of the 2D editors handle it well. Now if we modeled the world in solid modeler? :)))
My thinking at the moment is to map it by the roof over laps .. at least that is visible from the imagery.  If/when someone wants to take it from the 'ground level' they will have a starting point? Still thinking about it. Will have to look at what is in OSM, rather than just the error reports.
Leon K (2017-03-25 11:14:12+00:00): I've been there plenty of times, only issue I can see was one overlap, which i've just removed.  Hopefully that solves whatever error you're seeing.
Leon K (2017-03-25 11:16:06+00:00): A single building and building parts might work better, might look into that.  3D tagging isn't so bad, eventually you learn how to see the result from the tags.
Warin61 (2017-03-26 00:41:27+00:00): Thanks Leon. I'll have a look at it later .. There should be a method of tagging the roof too so that they don't clash.
DeBigC (2021-12-16 06:14:08+00:00): Landuses are overlapping here. I agree they may touch, but not overlap
sorcrosc (2019-12-01 01:20:01+00:00): Ciao.
Ho notato questo tag name:old=Piazza Milano. Ricordi se c'è un motivo particolare per questo name:old? Potrebbe essere un più comune old_name invece?

Lorenzo
Simone Saviolo (2019-12-01 22:13:51+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo, 

no, non ricordo un motivo in particolare. Probabilmente in quel periodo cercavo di strutturare i vari name con i namespace, come suggerivano alcuni.
Nakaner (2015-04-12 09:12:23+00:00): Bist du dir wirklich sicher, dass in Plaue (Thüringen) Hl-Signale stehen? Die Form der Stahlmaste lässt mich auf Ks schließen. https://img.oastatic.com/img/671/335/fit/11975134/bahnhof-plaue.jpg
marc__marc (2025-11-07 12:20:16+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272804966
peux-tu regarder cette anomalie ? une partie de bâtiment doit être un way fermé
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:54:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2777385616/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
InsertUser (2024-05-02 17:34:54+00:00): The name of "Blue Hole" looks like a description rather than a name to me so I'm rpeplacing it with the tag `sinkhole=bluehole` as documented on the wiki. 

If this really is a name rather than a description please add it back.
eggie (2019-07-26 20:12:55+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
b-unicycling (2022-08-23 20:55:38+00:00): Hi, another instance of "stile=g" which needs addressing, because that is not a documented tag. Could you run an overpass-turbo yourself, so I don't have to contact you for the remaining 6 instances, pls.
dudone (2022-08-25 20:44:52+00:00): Removed as typo.  Will need a survey.  I have never used overpass-turbo.
mttlbrd (2018-09-20 20:36:44+00:00): La posizione della Grotta del Ferratore è errata
DaRkBoDoM (2018-09-20 20:44:15+00:00): È possibile: mi sembra di ricordare che all'epoca la avevo rilevata da alcuni appunti approssimativi. Conosci quella corretta?
mttlbrd (2018-09-21 08:10:01+00:00): Appena ripasso da li prendo le coordinate gps e te le scrivo
DaRkBoDoM (2018-09-21 09:42:33+00:00): Grazie. Se vuoi non serve che me le scrivi: puoi spostarla direttamente tu.
luschi (2015-09-22 20:51:19+00:00): hai dimenticato di mettere toll=yes sui ponti della A23.
ti prego di controllare.
grazie
nikyk (2017-08-27 20:06:13+00:00): Уважаемый Atakua.
Поясните, пожалуйста, почему на ручей  вы поставили такие теги?
Летом ручей нисколько не похож на тропинку, по которой можно идти пешком.
В первый раз вижу "ski=yes". На Wiki такого тега я не нашел.
Для лыжней есть отдельные теги (piste)
На навигаторе это выглдит как тропинка.   Это вводит в заблуждение. Если Вы не возражаете, надо убрать теги highway, foot, ski, surface. Если там действительно идет лыжня, то поставить теги piste:type=classic и т.д.
Atakua (2017-08-28 05:20:56+00:00): nikyk, скорее всего, я ошибся (в редакторе применил скопированные теги к не тому пути). Эта линия не может быть тропой. Исправил.
anu_smita (2019-07-23 08:39:31+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 272984982 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-08-09 07:14:52+00:00): Hi. Fair enough, please adjust accordingly.
marc__marc (2020-11-15 23:28:14+00:00): Hello,
what's your meaning of class=cap ?
class key was depreciated in 2006 and  was used to describe the importance of a road,
Regards,
Marc
zstadler (2020-10-12 08:19:59+00:00): Hi,

Do you know if the construction of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273009003 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273009008 was completed?

Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2019-09-29 18:10:13+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered what the source for the prominence numbers in this changeset was - primarily because I'm wondering if something similar is available for England and Wales, so that (for example) https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=11&lat=54.5258&lon=-3.0742 isn't just a mass of peaks, but shows the most "important" ones somehow.
Best Regards,
Andy
duncaninnes (2019-09-29 20:18:58+00:00): Sure,

The prominence data was sourced mainly from Wikipedia if I remember correctly. I also found a site listing the details of all the Marilyn's, Corbett's, Graham's etc. Pretty sure it was heavily into the Scottish data, but can't remember if it went further South. My 'quest' ran out of juice before I managed to get to the border :-/
SomeoneElse (2019-09-29 20:36:25+00:00): Thanks for that.  Strictly speaking, data from wikipedia isn't licence-compatible with OSM (their licence in theory requires attribution that we can't guarantee), but I suspect that whatever source they used may be out of copyright by now! Older OS data will be, and hills don't change much.
One possible source might be http://www.hills-database.co.uk/ (DoBIH) which was discussed at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-February/thread.html#22493 , and at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-February/022501.html the author of that site was happy to see their data used, although there was a question about whether data that they may be reusing from OS would be appropriate for OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy
duncaninnes (2019-09-29 20:55:36+00:00): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Graham_mountains_in_Scotland

True. Although I *think* I entered the Wikipedia link to the peak data in the Wikipedia link (wherever possible). Attribution is important though. 

I'm sure one of the sites I got data from wasn't Wikipedia though. I don't have the links in my bookmarks any longer though. Will try to search history.
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:57:25+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273011194
has no tags. What is it?
SK53 (2016-06-15 10:06:19+00:00): You never added the name! (done now)
SomeoneElse (2016-06-15 14:25:51+00:00): D'oh!
yurasi (2017-02-14 23:17:25+00:00): Hi mcheckimport. 
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273095332). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain? 
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.
Dakon (2018-08-06 19:50:24+00:00): Was möchtest du uns mit dem station-Tags mitteilen? Zumal die überhaupt nicht zu dem passen, was das Wiki für den Tag dokumentiert.
biker@gf (2018-08-07 05:51:59+00:00): An den Kreis-, Land- und Bundesstraßen (auch Autobahnen) befinden sich kleine Schilder, auf denen die einzelnen Abschnitte beschrieben stehen. Dort ist auch die "Station" angegeben. Die Straßen sind von den Straßenbaubehörden in einzelne "kleine" Abschnitte unterteilt.
Dakon (2018-08-07 16:16:43+00:00): highway=milestone;distance=* ist eher der richtige Wert dafür, es ist ja schließlich die Distanz zum Beginn des Abschnitts. Für den Abschnitt sollte man sich allerdings noch was überlegen.
CloCkWeRX (2017-01-09 03:52:14+00:00): Hi - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273080558 doesn't appear on bing imagery or mapbox imagery, are you sure its right?
kiaraSh-Q (2018-12-16 22:42:20+00:00): سلام 
شما توی این چنج ست برای کل محدوده ی پمپ گاز شهرک مطهری از تگ 
building=yes
استفاده کردین که این کار اشتباه هست. 
این تگ مربوط به ساختمانهاست و فقط برای ساختمانها باید استفاده بشه.
southglos (2015-10-29 09:39:10+00:00): Hi

Just noticed that this changeset added a load of man_made=surveillance / note="On no entry sign pole" by Westbourne Terrace near Sussex Gardens; is it really that Big-Brotherish, or should they be trees?

Cheers.
SK53 (2015-10-29 12:10:09+00:00): Good spot; I imagine they are trees! They'll be London Planes too.
tuxayo (2015-03-02 20:49:45+00:00): Attention à côté de St Charles (Caisse prévoyance SNCF et DREAL/DDTM)
Il y avait une piste cyclable en double, le highway=path à côté est taggué pour inclure la piste cyclable.
tuxayo (2015-03-03 16:46:54+00:00): J'ai oublié de supprimer ce bout de piste:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273245882

Ça me permet aussi de dire qu'il faut faire attention à que ça soit bien relié au reste du réseaux routier, que ça soit au extrémités ou aux intersections, la piste cyclable n'était reliée à rien et donc inutilisable par un logiciel de routage.
Marc_ch (2020-11-20 20:36:06+00:00): Bonjour Fred,
j'ai completé les adresses de Courgevaux à partir de la base RegBl https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/GWR
j'ai un problème avec 2 adresses que tu as renseigné :
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273252759 que tu as renseigné comme étant le 1 Chemin des Cerisiers mais que le RegBl renseigne comme 14
Chemin Sur le Mont
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273252765 que tu as renseigné comme étant le 13
Chemin des Cerisiers mais que le RegBl renseigne comme le no 11
est-ce que j'écrase tes valeurs ou tu souhaites revérifier ?
Salutations,
Marc
naoliv (2014-11-29 14:21:36+00:00): Daltux, essas ruas com "D" (direita) e "E" (esquerda) no nome, são baseadas no que? Tem algum ponto de referência para definir o que é direita ou esquerda? E as ruas são realmente nomeadas dessa forma ou são utilizadas localmente, como algum tipo de referência apenas?
frosm (2020-01-06 16:03:34+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux dire DSP LiAin ? c'est le nom de l'opérateur ?
Thibault_T (2020-01-06 18:22:12+00:00): Bonjour, oui c’est ça : http://reso-liain.fr
frosm (2020-01-07 09:11:55+00:00): dans ce cas, une première amélioration serrait de séparer le nom de l'operateur dans la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3642095
il existe un attribut operator pour se faire

par ailleurs que représente les différentes lignes, ce sont les fibres elles-même ? ou elles représente les rues qui ont été fibrés ? ou les rues éligibles mais pas nécessairement fibrées ?
SK53 (2016-02-15 09:17:52+00:00): The RMSM may not be  a barracks, but it is certainly not a school as the tag is generally used on OSM: i.e., a place for education of 3-18 year olds. I have changed this back to landuse=military & added mlitary=training_establishment
GerdP (2015-10-22 05:43:28+00:00): please review way 180100804:
highway=ole ate
makes no sense, maybe you wanted to use name=ole ate?
I also see many untagged ways in this area. Maybe you know why?
Emilius123 (2023-04-05 13:33:59+00:00): Danke, und herzlichen Glückwunsch zum ersten Änderungssatz! Komm doch gerne mal wieder und trag weiter bei.
vuvan2611 (2023-02-03 14:32:30+00:00): Sehr geehrte Damen und Heeren,

leider konnte ich diesen Stadtnamen nicht umbenennen.
Der Stadtname sollte in "Weißenburg in Bayern" lauten, anstatt "Weißenburg i. Bay.".
Könnten Sie die Änderung vornehmen.

Ich danke Ihnen im Voraus.
przemas75 (2016-08-21 05:40:53+00:00): Co to znaczy odcinek prywatny? Bramy źle postawiłeś, nie są z drogą połączone.
adas (2016-08-15 20:07:15+00:00): Pytanie - czy tam nadal są jakieś bramy i brak przejazdu?
jakubowy (2016-08-16 18:35:39+00:00): Nie wiem jak jest teraz, ale dwa lata temu były bramy zabezpieczające teren porzuconej budowy domu na skarpie, jeżeli cały czas budowa stoi to zakładam że bramy są (ale dało  się obejść je krzakami obok wtedy)
adas (2016-08-16 19:39:03+00:00): No to zrobie wycieczke rowerowa tamtedy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 08:51:14+00:00): What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2783285645/history (and other 15 shop=internet)

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
Johnny Carlsen (2023-03-22 00:58:57+00:00): Good question, I don't remember. Checking my photos, I no longer think this is here, whatever it was. I'll remove it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 07:21:11+00:00): there are also some other entries with the same situation (you are top user of shop=online tag :) )

If you could look at them it would be great! If not feasible or unsolvable - let me know and I will create notes so someone local will check (or you can create them)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6081384 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/955950076/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/8604571 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1346437593/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6398288 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993463325/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6411792 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/995662982/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6364452 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/988568710/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5235126 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/820812618/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9629995 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1477513413/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6974393 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1104317096/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20575406 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2672853325/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9873331 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1508558169/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9873402 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1508569742/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9738023 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1491308235/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9738109 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1491325584/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9738775 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1491444460/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11084957 editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1688721023/history