piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dval (2021-12-01 16:23:41+00:00): Здравствуйте, redwings69! Не очень понятно, зачем вы скалал назначаете natural=peak? Согласно ОСМ-Вики пик - это всё-таки гора, вершина. Ничего подобного к скалам не применимо. Достаточно присвоить имена именно скалам, без добавления иных тегов.
redwings69 (2021-12-02 01:55:23+00:00): Здравствуйте, dval. То есть, присвоить имя natural=cliff? Если не сложно, пример дайте, как правильно сделать.
dval (2021-12-02 08:03:05+00:00): Да, я думаю, достаточно нейм добавить к нэйчерал, т.е. natural=cliff + name=***. У вас есть такое на "Чёртовой лестнице". Т.е. точки peak убрать, нарисовать линию скалы cliff, если нет её, пусть всего из двух-трех точек. Спасибо за названия: бываю иногда здесь, а названий не знаю. На других реках района тоже много скал без названий в ОСМ, увы.
MarcoR (2021-11-30 13:23:56+00:00): Il gruppo di modifiche mi sembra corretto. In quell'area vi sono altri oggetti chiamati "Campo dei Girasole"; se il nome corretto è quello inserito da te, potresti correggere gli altri :)
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
adrianojbr (2021-11-29 21:25:49+00:00): Olá, Jener! Boa pergunta. Na falta de etiquetas específicas, muitas vezes usamos as mais próximas. Acho que é o caso aqui. Se preferir, pode levar a discussão para o canal de suporte no Telegram (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte), em que há bastante mapeadores ativos. Abraço.
Jener (2021-11-29 22:50:20+00:00): Oi, Adriano!
Legal, estou enferrujado no OSM, mas faz todo o sentido, te agradeço!
Amanhã voltarei lá e certamente terei mais informações que senti falta para adicionar.
Um abraço!
adrianojbr (2021-11-29 23:28:37+00:00): Seja bem vindo de volta! Abraço!
Murcik (2022-01-16 08:25:20+00:00): Lucifer Kinoff!
Этой правкой сломаны отношения
    Ленинский район 
    Тагилстроевский район 
Границы теперь не замкнуты.
Исправьте, пожалуйста.
philippec (2021-11-29 22:49:32+00:00): Holsbeek sportschuur aed.
De laatste foto is lang geleden, is er een nieuwe survey date ?
janolezab (2021-11-29 18:19:19+00:00): Moin! Wenn das Kindergartengebäude abgebaut wurde, schlage ich eher razed:building vor, eventuell in Kombination mit disused:amenity, anstatt Linien ohne primary feature zurückzulassen.
Javed52233 (2021-11-29 16:40:43+00:00): Good
mini-me (2021-11-29 19:04:22+00:00): Привет
Пожалуйста, не надо дублировать public_transport=platform на бордюрах. Если прям очень хочется, то нужно перенести теги с точки на линию и включить её в отношение маршрута. Но это только усложнит жизнь всем, кто с этими данными работает. Лучше оставить как есть :)
Frans S (2021-12-17 14:43:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114368383
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
carfog81 (2021-11-30 18:12:00+00:00): Please do not damage multipolygon relationships or administrative boundaries. This is a very common Kaart mistake. #Kaart;#Kaart-43
zstadler (2023-01-18 15:24:20+00:00): Hello Flayer,

Thank you for your continued contribution to OSM mapping!

In this old edit, a large section of Hakdoshim forest, between road 1 and road 395, was deleted from the relation.

The deleted area included 3 "inner" members that still exist in the relation, which make it an invalid multi-polygon.

Was this done by mistake?
Flayer (2023-01-18 16:36:35+00:00): Hi, as far as I remember I was trying to fix something. Maybe something went wrong, it is hard to tell.
zstadler (2023-04-15 18:07:20+00:00): Hi,

I finally was able to resolve this. At least I hope so...

There was a significant cleanup work after all the edits over time.
Hernan (2021-12-01 12:57:44+00:00): Hola, por favor antes de realizar este tipo de cambios, comunicate con la comunidad de Argentina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto Gracias
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114369298
Kokosnøtt (2021-11-29 17:35:11+00:00): I usually wouldn't edit incomplete road projects but I felt like it was needed here because of the moved road (Fritz C. Rivers veg) heading south. Another reason is the removed roads.
archpdx (2021-12-02 07:34:02+00:00): Hi,
In the future, please use more descriptive changeset comments: '#school #driftent' is vague and makes it difficult to review this changeset, especially since it covers large geographical area. See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, please do not use names to describe features such as (https://www.osm.org/way/1007419429) - in this case the tagging should be sufficient on its own. For more on this see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
dns10 (2021-11-30 02:51:46+00:00): sorry, I don't think I should have deleted the landuse=residential right away before commenting first. can help put it back and pare it down to cover only residential areas
skorasaurus (2021-12-01 19:08:27+00:00): no worries; I think I made it years ago when I didn't know as better. :D
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
Freek Bes (2021-12-11 01:38:23+00:00): Hoi, kleine opmerking: ik weet niet of je dit gebouw verwijderd had vanwege de opmerking op de kaart op deze locatie, maar zoja vergeet dan niet de opmerking als opgelost te markeren!
Riemer17 (2021-12-12 07:08:00+00:00): Oh ja dat was ik vergeten. Fijn dat jij de opmerking dan nog even sluit
Frans S (2021-11-30 15:12:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads

Short roads leading to a single building or business do not need to be mapped if they can be seen from the main road.
Highways needs to be connected to crossing roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114372227
Frans S (2021-11-30 15:14:22+00:00): Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

You use the wrong tags for roads in urban areas.|
Residential roads , connecting houses , should be tagged as residential

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114372227
ElliottPlack (2021-12-16 06:42:13+00:00): Dave, this edit damages existing roads by converting them to cart paths. Please refrain from this sort of thing.

--
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114372442
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 06:43:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990383 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109
aceman444 (2021-12-29 19:53:15+00:00): Zdravim, internaty urcite nie su amenity=college. place=neighbourhood tiez nebola dobra znacka, ale tot nie je ziadne zlepsenie. building=dormitory by stacilo, ale na budove, nie na bode mimo.
Kabaz (2021-12-29 20:09:36+00:00): Súhlasím, no tak ten tag bol predtým a prekrýval názvy blokov, čo mi tiež neprišlo ideálne, čo by bolo zobrazenie aj názvu časti internátov, aj názvov blokov
aceman444 (2022-01-10 22:59:22+00:00): Nerozumiem. Ako zmena znacky (na nespravnu) ovplyvnila umiestnenie nazvu? A zial prekryvanie nazvov neovplyvnite, to je uloha pre vykreslovac mapy. Nazov musi byt v OSM tam, kde objekt naozaj je. Ano v tomto pripade su cele internaty oznacene jednym bodom a ten moze byt aj inde, nemusi byt nutne v geometrickom strede. Opravim to poriadne.
ma-rt-in (2021-12-08 19:58:47+00:00): Hallo,
deine Eintragung habe ich entfernt, da diese bereits vollständig erfasst ist.

vg
carfog81 (2021-11-30 18:00:00+00:00): Please do not damage multipolygon relationships or administrative boundaries. This is a very common Kaart mistake. #Kaart;#Kaart-43
martien-176 (2021-11-29 19:39:06+00:00): Hi Zampachm, thanks for mapping. One remark, i see you sometimes delete a building that is incorrectly mapped. And map a new correct building in its place. It is better though to not delete it and move and retrace it until it is good. Generally speaking, deleting features that do exist is considered vandalism. Thanks again and please keep mapping, you are doing well.
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:07:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007437264/history. I delete your key `````````````````````````````````````````
Jun@id (2021-11-29 19:33:16+00:00): i create it for parctice
Adam_Piszczek (2022-04-06 19:10:17+00:00): Ambona ma inne tagi
VA00 (2022-04-07 06:28:49+00:00): Powinno być amenity=hunting_stand

i czemu są 2 ?
Gonéo (2021-11-29 20:30:02+00:00): Par rapport à la request review : pas certain que le tag `zebra`soit réellement déprécié
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:crossing%3Dzebra
Glassman (2021-12-01 19:29:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One question - you added layer=-1 - I'm not sure why? that would indicate it's under something. 

BTW - Thanks for updating the Museum of glass. I love the place and have been there a number of times. (Notice my user name)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114374930
Glassman (2021-12-01 19:30:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114375051
PT-53 (2021-12-04 17:58:38+00:00): Hallo skyper,
mich würde interessieren, warum Du in Riedlingen die Grabenstraße aufgetrennt hast:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24557371/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007454730/history
Fragende Grüße
skyper (2021-12-06 02:02:11+00:00): Hi PT-53
Oh, ich hatte versucht Du Busvarianten der Linie 395 zum Riedlinger ZOB zu reparieren. habe aber aufgegeben und vergessen, die Stücke wieder zu vereinigen. Sorry.
Grüße skyper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13481555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13481551
chris2map (2022-07-23 15:31:06+00:00): Hi skyper,
ich bin gerade auf Dein Tagging von Fahrspuren und einer Sperrfläche mit both_ways und emergency gestoßen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/748866001). Da es mir völlig neu ist, die Frage, gibt es dazu irgendwo eine Dokumentations- oder Diskussionsseite? Ich würde gerne mehr darüber erfahren.
Danke und Grüße,
Chris
PT-53 (2022-07-23 16:48:51+00:00): Hallo chris2map,
lies Dir das mal durch:
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75939
Grüße
skyper (2022-08-02 15:01:26+00:00): Hi Chris
Nee, es gibt noch keine Dokumentations und das Tagging ist bisher auch nur ein Versuch, der auf ganz unterschiedliche Meinungen trifft.

Grüße,
skyper
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:12:03+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key Full_Plus_Code ?
augxcgrwxo (2021-12-01 16:21:56+00:00): Hi! I was trying out a RapID editor and checkeded only the main jag of the building. This tag has been provided with the basic contours on the building layers
augxcgrwxo (2021-12-01 16:24:35+00:00): my understanding is that this is data in this format : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Location_Code

do you suggest deleting them?
user_5359 (2021-12-01 16:46:27+00:00): Hi! Did you know the discussion on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_Open_Location_Code#Is_OLC_proprietary.3F ?
AngocA (2021-11-30 13:33:39+00:00): Los comentarios en esta parte que indiquen qué cambios hiciste son muy importantes. No un conjunto de letras aleatorias del teclado.
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:12:05+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key Full_Plus_Code ?
augxcgrwxo (2021-12-01 16:25:28+00:00): hi! I already answered in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114375256
lets discuss it there, wont be adding any information more yet
AngocA (2021-11-30 13:32:13+00:00): Este cable es válido? o es una prueba de mapeo?
AngocA (2021-11-30 13:32:33+00:00): Esto es un nodo válido o una prueba de mapeo?
wille (2021-11-29 21:53:16+00:00): Your edits were reverted by vandalism and denounced to the Data Working Group.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114375753
aixbrick (2021-11-30 08:50:31+00:00): Hallo,
stimmt. Danke für die Korrektur.
Gruß
user_3022894 (2021-12-01 17:49:39+00:00): Hi aixbrick,
jo, kein Problem. Nett dass du dich bedankst ;-)
Gruß Lukas
SomeoneElse (2021-11-29 21:29:10+00:00): Hello again VARVAR8,
In addition to the things previously mentioned, could you please try and use changeset comments that explain to other mappers what changes you're making?  Here you've used a bunch of hashtags and  then just "challenge_19281" which doesn't really say anything.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details.
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 01:24:19+00:00): Ukraine. Івано-Франківська область. Додавання кладовищ, відсутніх в ОСМ
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/19281, забрав неправильны теги "tracktype=grade3"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114376000
VARVAR8 (2021-12-04 01:46:25+00:00): This option will satisfy You?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:52:29+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
wielandb (2021-11-29 23:57:30+00:00): Heyho :) 

Wieso gibt es hier jetzt auf einmal drei mal amenity=school, obwohl es dort nur eine Schule zu geben scheint?
Insbesondere, da es ja eine Relation mit der Schule zu geben scheint.
 
Außerdem: Gehört der Schulgarten nicht zur Schule?
wielandb (2021-11-30 00:01:46+00:00): Außerdem: Wieso besteht die Schule aus zwei Linien, die eine Relation bilden, anstatt einfach ein Way zu sein?
wielandb (2021-11-30 00:15:54+00:00): Bzgl: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007464986

amenity=parking_space meint einzelne Stellplätze auf einem Parkplatz. Hier ist sogar capacity=1 angegeben. Ich vermute mal, es sollte eher ein amenity=parking sein(?)
Samuel-Heinrich (2021-11-30 15:23:00+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Der Parkplatz nördlich des Schulhofes ist Stellplatz für die Mitarbeiter. Bei Schule/Schulgelände war ich mir unschlüssig, wie die Flächennutzung richtig ist.
Ändere gern! Ich schaue es mir dann an. Wenn dir der Detailierungsgrad zu hoch ist, bitte gern überarbeiten.
wielandb (2021-12-05 02:18:46+00:00): Hab das jetzt mal so gemappt, wie ich denke dass es gut ist. :)

Hohen Detailgrad finde ich cool, aber ich konnte nicht wirklich ein tagging finden, um den Schulhof als dediziertes Objekt zu kennzeichnen. :( Ich glaube das gibt es nicht wirklich.
Samuel-Heinrich (2021-12-06 14:28:49+00:00): Hab schon gesehen. Finde ich gut so. Danke. Leider ist einer der Bäume weg. Wir pflanzen einen neuen damit es wieder stimmt. Bin da Geolehrer. VG.
gpserror (2022-09-16 14:41:59+00:00): Hi, just as a comment, we shouldn't be putting names on buildings unless they are specifically named as such... that being said, if there's a whole bunch of buildings named the same near each other, they're not really named to distinguish them from each other? :)
Well, ideally the apartment complex name should be put on the landuse polygon that encompasses all the buildings, so we know that each of the buildings within the complex are related together because they all sit in the same landuse.  Shows up much more tidy too.
Jordi MF (2021-11-30 20:23:40+00:00): Hola inode64,
Este pico que has añadido como Peñaescabia 1, ¿no se trata de un pico sin nombre? ¿O acaso se considera esta cima como la verdadera Peñaescabia a pesar de que el vértice geodésico estéen otro lugar? Como no pueden haber dos cimas "Peñaescabia", ¿consideras que deberíamos eliminar alguno de los nodos?
Saludos,
Jordi
inode64 (2021-12-13 07:58:55+00:00): Perdón , no he visto tu mensaje
Lo miro despues del curro y te digo algo
Jordi MF (2021-12-14 22:17:44+00:00): De acuerdo. Es que me resultó curioso.
Un saludo!
Frans S (2021-11-30 14:28:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114376873
they (2021-12-06 20:59:51+00:00): Can you provide justification for the highway classification changes you made?  North Roadrunner Parkway and Settler Pass, in particular, look suspicious.  Living here, I know that those are definitely not secondary.  They are feeder roads providing access to neighborhoods.  They should be tertiary.  Likewise, Engler Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170524639) does not currently connect the Park Hill subdivision to any other thoroughfare or neighborhood.  This makes any claim that it is tertiary seem dubious.
Frans S (2021-11-30 14:29:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114376957
aweech (2021-11-30 14:43:03+00:00): Hi,
What is your source for changing the name of this peak and path away from the traditional spelling?
tomzyl (2021-11-29 21:15:46+00:00): Poprawa kompletnie niezgodna z ustalonymi wytycznymi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Multiple_school_on_one_site
NieWnen (2021-11-30 13:35:41+00:00): Oprócz niepoprawnego tagowania szkoły (duplikaty amenity i usunięcie landuse=education), proszę nie sklejaj wszystkiego z budynkami.

Z drogami też to nie powinno być łączone.

Jeśli chcesz zachować "routing" to i tak powinieneś poprowadzić ścieżki przez "obszar chodnikowy" i to je podłączasz do drogi.

Jeśli chodzi o amenity=parking_space to capacity=1 jest zbędne, to jest domyślna wartość.

Poprawiłem tagowanie szkoły + przedszkola oraz miejsca parkingowe, ale obszary dalej do poprawienia.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114403604
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-30 22:12:02+00:00): Hey Anne,

You should remove building=yes from the inner circle on the horse walker for it to render correctly.

Also, the horse riding area should be tagged leisure=pitch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#Riding_arena
A track usually has a route (e.g. roundtrip, used in horse racing) or linear lanes (used in jousting). A pitch gives you more space to move around (used in dressure); it doesn't have a route, though in general training you'd usually make a roundtrip, which can be seen on aerial imagery.

Fyi: when changed to leisure=pitch, you do not have to mark a route, or change to an area or multipolygon. A pitch is an area by default.

Regards,

Daniel
b-unicycling (2021-11-30 22:26:07+00:00): Thanks, would you mind added a shorter version under the video,if that's how you found it? I've fixed this one and will bear it in mind for the next cases.
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-30 23:49:47+00:00): I wouldn't mind.
rothg (2021-12-09 23:12:54+00:00): To keep this consistent with the other MAX platforms, I think we should either revert this to a footway that cuts through the middle of the platform (Example: Willow Creek), or have two short footways extend from the pedestrian crossings on each side of the platform to the two sides of the platform (Example: Hawthorn Farm).

What do you think? I'm open to either of the two proposed options, and kind of hope everyone can decide on just 1 scheme for all MAX platforms.
jhmeniscus (2021-12-13 19:39:22+00:00): I reverted it to a footway. The platforms drawn as areas and then the footway making connections to other adjacent ways makes more sense. Thanks for pointing it out.
fabiotofy (2021-12-01 12:27:01+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto! Quando si compila una scheda indicante anche l'indirizzo dell'attività commerciale il tag "addr:city" non lo si potrebbe omettere. Riesci a completare inserendo anche il nome della città ? (Trieste). Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114378257
◪ Jarv (2021-11-30 04:52:24+00:00): Hate to be a pain, but I thought the former halt here was on the Southern side of Monteswood Lane. Whats the source it was on the Northern side?
letsridebikes (2021-11-30 06:13:28+00:00): Thank you for the correction! I was looking at old photographs and trying to line them up with features still visible like the bridges. Happy to fix this.
VictorIE (2021-12-01 10:20:33+00:00): Hi

Watch out for duplicated ways! :) Each us on a relation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007486322
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007485246
Ivandor (2021-12-01 13:37:00+00:00): Thanks, fixed now!