piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2020-02-21 12:16:00+00:00): Hallo Fireman2130,
Ik heb nog twee tips:
- Een rotonde krijgt slechts een name-tag als de rotonde zelf een naam heeft, bijvoorbeeld het Europaplein in Alphen. Namen van zijwegen taggen we niet op de rotondes. Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Naming

- Je hoeft wegen pas op te splitsen als de eigenschappen (tags en relaties) veranderen. Bij een rotonde komt dit vaak voor wanneer een buslijn over een deel van de rotonde rijdt (de bus rijdt natuurlijk geen rondje rotonde) of bij een turborotonde waar het aantal rijstroken wisselt. Hier is het dus niet nodig om de rotondes op te splitsen.
FM2441 (2020-02-21 14:55:16+00:00): Hoi, ik zou het graag met je eens zijn, maar conform het NLB, welke door de gemeente wordt aangeleverd, hebben deze wegvakken wel deze naam! Dus het is officieel. Waarschijnlijk heeft de Gemeente Alphen aan den Rijn consequent deze keuze gemaakt.
Op ons werk zijn wij hier erg afhankelijk van en ik ga er vanuit dat OSM alleen de keiharde waarheid laat zien.

Dus ik snap dat het niet wenselijk is, maar officieel is het wel zo...
FM2441 (2020-02-22 21:36:41+00:00): Nog wel een vraagje. Vrijliggende fietspaden hebben soms wel de straatnaam van de hoofdrijbaan, de andere keer niet.
Regelmatig krijg ik het advies om de vrijliggende fietspaden ook de naam van de weg te geven, maar soms is het niet helemaal duidelijk of het fietspad vrijliggende is of dat het deel uitmaakt van niets of een andere weg. Vooral bij kruispunten en rotondes is het lastig. Met name de oversteken.
Wat is jou advies hierin?
G1asshouse (2020-02-21 07:38:10+00:00): Success! (Recently, I've also had trouble with JOSM)
Allison P (2020-02-21 21:49:57+00:00): Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories there should not be a relation of Disney parks because it is a category.
iWowik (2020-02-23 19:14:21+00:00):  Рад приветствовать вас в проекте!
 Я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и к тому же пишете в имя населенного пункта (sddr:city) его тип (село), что делать не следует.

    Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
    Обычно их сложно найти, чтобы понять где на карте какой адрес нужна карта или схема.
    К тому же у различных карт и планов есть правообладатели и без их явного разрешения данные в OSM вносить нельзя.
    Целью проекта является сбор данных, свободных от претензий других лиц, поэтому данные, вносимые без разрешения их владельцами могут в какой-то момент быть удалены из проекта.
mo_kurush (2020-02-25 07:14:54+00:00): Здравствуйте, вполне ожидаемый вопрос, спасибо Вам за него, я являюсь заместителем главы МО "село Куруш", у нас ведется адресный журнал, плюс информация еще заносится в ФИАС (Федеральная информационная адресная система). Более того, являясь органом местного самоуправления, мы занимаемся присвоением, изменением и аннулированием адресов объектов недвижимости (ЗУ, ОКС). Исходя из этого, у нас самая актуальная информация об адресации в селе. А за замечание, по поводу указывания типа населенного пункта в названии, спасибо, не владел всей полнотой информации, что и привело к ошибке, надеюсь она не столь грубая.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-14 15:25:44+00:00): Hi there. These roads are outdated due to construction in the area. Please note the landuse=construction and then be wary of adding roads that may have been removed within that construction area.
kshtdh (2021-05-17 07:54:10+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.Apologies,for adding roads inside construction area and I've missed checking the landuse=construction.
Will ensure not to repeat such errors going ahead,Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kshtdh
Adamant1 (2020-03-05 10:11:43+00:00): Hello. It would have cool if you hadn't have screwed with 44 and the all the bridges.  You ended up moving most of the junctions way further down the freeway then they actually where and you moved the bridge going across the Sacramento bridge so it's smaller then it actually is. Everything was fine before you edited it. Now it's going to be a massive hassle to fix. At least next time don't edit so many things at once. At it just makes your edits that much more convoluted.
Adamant1 (2020-03-05 10:36:23+00:00): Same goes for i5
iandees (2020-03-05 13:34:00+00:00): Yo Adamant1, comments like this aren't very helpful. If you don't have constructive feedback, don't bother leaving a comment.
Adamant1 (2020-03-05 18:36:56+00:00): Yo Indees, what the hell are you talking about and why are you even commenting in the first place? I'm not sure what's unconstructive about pointing out when someone maps something wrong. People do it all the time. Same goes for asking people to make smaller changests so they are easier to review. Neither is a big deal. Not that it matters, but I've lived along this stretch of road most of my life and drive it every day. As such, I know from actual daily experience where the junctions are located. As such,  I have every right to leave someone a changeset comment saying their edit was wrong so it doesnt happen again. Especially if its an edit from someone that's not local, doesn't account for local mapping preferences. Removing useful tags and arbitrary moving things that were fine already in the process. As was the case here and has happened multiple times already with the freeways in this area. Which I've had to correct many times due to similar things. 

Generally, it seems like you have a real thing for tone policing by calling out people on things that you know zero about and that aren't actually issuses. Which is the epitome of not being constructive. Tone policing never goes anywhere and it usually just pisses people off. So, maybe just skip it next time. 

Thanks,  

Adamant1
iandees (2020-03-05 18:38:11+00:00): Yes, it's important to make OSM feel welcoming and inviting to people so that we retain mappers. Your comment didn't meet that level, so I thought I'd call it out.
Adamant1 (2020-03-05 19:08:36+00:00): Exactly and your comments arent either of those things. They just make it look like the platform is full of nitpickers. Plus, the comments arent inviting or welcoming to the people your making them to. It just makes them less inclined to comment. If the person thought my comment was bad they can speak for themselves about it. Know one appointed you to be the voice of the people. Plus, you didnt say what exactly about my comment didnt reach "the level" anyway. hatever "level" your talking about is just your standard. Nothing I said goes against any OSM "level" for what is acceptable to message someone about.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-07 01:30:23+00:00): @Adamant1 I agree with @iandees here - your initial comment here wasn't very helpful.  You said "It would have cool if you hadn't have screwed with 44 and the all the bridges" but it's not immediately clear what that actually means.  I can see from looking at https://osmcha.org/changesets/81304282/ how the freeway junctions have changed, but don't understand the rest of what you are saying.  Aside from that, it's perfectly possible to discuss how to do things better without comments like "what the hell are you talking about and why are you even commenting in the first place".
Best Regards,
Andy
Adamant1 (2020-03-07 07:04:56+00:00): My bad then. Looking back I did get a tad defensive in my original message. Although, I thought I was clear about what the problem was. If you say I wasn't, I must not have been though. So, apologies to everyone involved. 

With the comment to iandees I probably could have been better there also, but the user had already been called out for similar "language policing" comments on other changeset discussions before and I had specifically asked them not to do it to me anymore. So, it felt a little intrusive and uncalled for. Although, like I said I still could have responded better anyway. So, apologies to everyone involved.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-07 11:55:58+00:00): @Adamant1 - thanks.
Luzandro (2020-04-06 04:55:39+00:00): Hallo,

kann man diese Relation löschen, nachdem sie nur mehr aus einem Node besteht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10629208/history
viloan (2020-02-21 07:13:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muzirian (2020-02-27 16:05:30+00:00): fence can be drawn as line https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dfence
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81305399
Vinber (2020-02-23 17:21:44+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

nouvelle-nouveau, un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, alors s'il vous plaît, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628

Et n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...
raknm (2020-02-21 07:56:41+00:00): Hi, 
I made the edit in this Changeset: 81306387 using Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery 
Thanks, 
raknm
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:55:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2020-02-22 17:15:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. Please have also a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
panoramedia (2020-02-29 20:15:27+00:00): Why did you delete this?
rskedgell (2020-02-21 10:04:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for updating the map. You requested a review on your edit, so the obvious remark is that your changeset comment "#jpmc0221" does not give any useful information. Have the two buildings which you deleted been demolished? If they have been and they are now building sites, the areas could perhaps be tagged with landuse=construction ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction ).
matteo564 (2020-06-18 07:20:01+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto tra i mappatori di Openstreetmap! Ho visto che hai aggiunto molte punte, vorrei darti alcuni consigli "tecnici" sui gruppi di modifiche o changeset per facilitarci il lavoro reciprocamente: 

- per gli altri mappatori il commento ad ogni modifica è molto utile [1], in particolare oltre a cosa si è fatto, in generale è anche importante scrivere il perché; nel tuo caso ti suggerisco di essere più preciso (in termini di "cosa") nel commento (il perchè in questo caso è sottinteso), per es : "prima aggiunta della punta di pippo" oppure " aggiunte cime mancanti nella valle di caio" o ancora "ho spostato la punta sempronio perchè dopo un sopralluogo con gps o basandomi sulle immagini era in una posizione non corretta"
Non è sempre necessario dilungarsi troppo ma a volte è utile, per far saper cosa si è fatto agli altri mapper

- se ti è più comodo, quando le modifiche che fai sono poche e circoscritte in un area piccola puoi, ma non è obbligatorio, farne più di una nello stesso changeset [2] prima di salvare

Se hai qualche dubbio chiedi pure.
Ti ringrazio per le modifiche apportate, non hai fatto nulla che non vada quindi spero che tu non stessi pensando questo, volevo solo darti qualche suggerimento per migliorare come si fa tra membri della comunity, sono contento che tu abbia iniziato a mappare, vai avanti così che sei sulla buona strada :)

Buone mappature
Matteo

[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Changeset
mavl (2020-02-21 16:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81324628 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3512].
mavl (2020-02-21 16:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81324628 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3512].
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:56:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2020-02-21 19:27:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mvviveka (2020-02-21 08:52:00+00:00): Hi
In this changeset# 81308699, the edits are made using Latest Private Earthwatch Imagery.
Regards,
Mvviveka.
mg09 (2024-08-19 04:53:05+00:00): Hier gab es eine Straßen-Umbenennung dieses Teilbereichs der Straße. Diese heißt nun "Am Dingstuhl". Die Hausnummern haben sich auch verändert. Auf GoogleMaps sind die Hausnummern schon korrigiert, die Straßen-Umbenennung ist noch nicht korrigiert. Siehe hier auf GoogleMaps: https://g.co/kgs/J9kmuEE (leider habe ich kein anderes Dokument von der Stadt Taucha gefunden).
IlBano (2020-03-03 22:51:35+00:00): Anche qui come in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81309232 hai duplicato delle vie per inserire le corsie preferenziali. Queste ultime erano già definite correttamente come attributi delle vie pre-esistenti. Sono convinto che sei mosso da buone intenzioni, ma cortesemente rimuovi in autonomia tutte le modifiche di questo tipo che hai fatto perchè palesemente errate. Se hai dubbi scrivi un commento al changeset, mandami una mail OSM oppure vieni a conoscere la comunità italiana iscrivendoti alla mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it - messaggi consultabili anche  qui http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-f5324173.html)
Ciao
IlBano (2020-03-03 22:26:44+00:00): In questo changeset hai duplicato una parte di Via degli Artisti. L'intenzione era immagino aggiungere una corsia preferenziale per mezzi pubblici in direzione Piazza Vasari, ma questa è già rappresentata correttamente dai tag lanes:psv:backward e oneway:psv della pre-esistente way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23414709. Ho provveduto a rimuovere quanto hai aggiunto: se qualcosa non ti è chiaro commenta sul changeset o scrivimi. Ciao
eggie (2020-02-21 19:50:46+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk. area=yes is helemaal niet in OSM. Dat gebruik je in combinatie met andere tags om vlakken te maken. 
Kijk in de wiki hoe een dierenwei te taggen.
Geef svp  bij je commentaar aan wat je hebt toegevoegd. 
Wellicht is dit iets?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:zoo%3Dpetting_zoo  

MVG,
Eggie
abakus_uploader (2020-02-21 23:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
frosm (2020-02-21 11:08:32+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pour info, le nom dans osm, c'est réelement un nom :)
marie ou monument aux morts ne sont pas le nom d'un objet précis, c'est une description de ce que c'est.
vous pouvez utiliser le moteur de recherche dans l'éditeur pour rempalcer le mot générique marie par le bon attribut qui le décrit.
bonne continuation
geri-oc (2020-07-03 12:24:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279960379/history
Warum änderst du name=* auf ref=*?
Warum korrigierst du offensichtliche Fehler wie path mit bicycle=yes, foot=yes, motor_vehicle=no nicht?
Die Strandzugänge sind offiziell mit Namen und Tafel ausgerüstet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:2014_Strandzug%C3%A4nge_in_Warnem%C3%BCnde.jpg
Ich spreche hier für Rostock. Im Forum wird auch über deine Änderungen in anderen Orten diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69910
Vielleicht kannst du dich beteiligen und deine Gründe mitteilen.
Gruß Gerd
eggie (2020-02-21 19:52:07+00:00): Probeer op de adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf. 
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
trigpoint (2020-02-25 10:32:19+00:00): Hi
The URL you have previously added seems to contain a lot of random junk, I assume that this is some sort of marketing/tracking activity. If so that is not acceptable use of OSM. For this hotel you only need https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/bhxsadi-doubletree-stratford-upon-avon/

Also is this account, from the first edit, being used by a single individual. Shared accounts are also not acceptable and all edits in OSM should be attributable to an individual.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-02-25 10:59:38+00:00): Please disregard the above comment, I was looking at a draf policy and made quick assumptions about the URLs.

I was wrong, sorry.

Cheers Phil
Allison P (2020-02-21 16:22:55+00:00): Roads should not be connected to powerlines. A connection between two features implies there should be routing from one to the other. Powerlines should go over all features and not touch them. I have fixed this. In order to prevent this from happening again, I suggest disabling power features in the side menu so that they are invisible.
mwakram (2020-02-24 04:03:54+00:00): Hi Allison,

Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake. Will take extra care going forward and ensure to make better edits in the future. Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
mwakram.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81324628 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3512].
muzirian (2020-02-27 16:04:07+00:00): residential suits more than unclassified for small roads leading to houses
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81310966
muzirian (2020-02-27 16:04:37+00:00): good job mapping mapping other things in detail
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81310966
eggie (2020-02-21 19:28:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 06:11:39+00:00): Hier wurde surface asphalt gesetzt, aber tracktype auf grade2 belassen. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58402871
David Hubert (2024-10-03 12:15:21+00:00): Nein, keine Absicht. Ich denke das hat StreetComplete so gemacht.
Es ist eine geschlossene Asphalt-Decke.
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 14:23:43+00:00): Hier auch, bitte: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58403258
😉
Vinber (2020-02-23 17:22:31+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

nouvelle-nouveau, un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, alors s'il vous plaît, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628

Et n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...
Vinber (2020-02-23 17:23:41+00:00): Et concernant votre commentaire, merci pour l'information mais openstreetmap concerne des données ouvertes, et pas forcément des données personnelles comme celles que vous avez fourni.
ftcat (2020-02-21 13:08:31+00:00): Hi,

Just to warn you, you have broken the wetland relationship here. Also you are mapping floating vegetation that is not permanent so pretty pointless
mapwitch (2020-02-24 12:01:23+00:00): I have divided the bulky huge multipolygon of the region into smaller parts. At changeset 61293082 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61293082) there was a similar situation in 2018. Consensus according to the wiki is to create smaller multipolygons in principle ((https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank#Choice_of_size_of_the_multipolygon_relations_for_riverbank_mapping). The validator in JOSM did not report any errors during these changesets, it is quite reliable in this respect. 

The fact that I have added many areas of floating vegetation to the wetland zone may be too strict in some areas, but there are many possibilities to differentiate wetland (swamp/ bog/ fen/ marsh/ mud/ reedbed/ wet_meadow/ saltmarsh/ tidalflat/ mangrove) with the possibility to mark temporary flooding (tidal/ seasonal). Thus, such areas can be more accurately captured than by a simple water tag. The original ways have been retained in the database (with a corresponding note), they can be used to make these differentiations.