piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
martien-176 (2022-10-11 17:48:39+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Another thing to watch out for: avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping with other buildings or with eg roads. Use the Alt key to prevent snapping one feature to the other.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127360257
eggie (2022-10-11 14:23:22+00:00): Dag Joris.. Op een wandelpad mag niet gefietst worden  behalve als dat staat aangegeven.
Een wandelpad heeft een G7 bord (highway=footway)  Wanneer dat bord er niet staat taggen we highway=path. Dat routeert ook voor fietsers. Is het hier niet een highway=path?


MVG
eggie
jorishaak (2022-10-11 15:47:00+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Dit betreft een verhard gravel/grind pad, waar fietsen ook is toegestaan. Ik ben inderdaad nieuw op dit platform, dus weet niet hoe het aangeduid moet worden. Je suggestie highway = path klinkt dan goed. Ik heb het nu gewijzigd, kun je dit checken? Vast bedankt!
eggie (2022-10-11 16:04:58+00:00): Zal zo kijken...

surface=gravel  is wel heel grof en nauwelijks te fietsen...
We kennen ook fine_gravel..

Dat zie je meer op paden.. zeker waar je kunt fietsen.
Op een highway=path taggen we wel vaak bij bicycle=yes (of no) en foot=yes . Op een footway hoeft dat niet.  (Behalve als fietsers zijn toegestaan, maar dat zie je bijna nergens) 
Zet wel commentaar op je nieuwe changeset.

Groet
eggie
Carto'Cité (2023-02-22 17:49:30+00:00): Bonjour.
Je me suis permis de corriger les nodes railway=station que tu avais changé en railway=tram_stop, par exemple https://www.osm.org/node/9992290863.
En effet, ces nodes correspondent à la station de tramway et non aux arrêts, qui existent aussi et sont des nodes placés sur les rails. Le tag tram=stop sur ces railway=station précise qu'il s'agit d'une station de tramway. 
Peut-être est-ce l'éditeur iD qui induit en erreur ?
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
literan (2022-10-11 18:18:09+00:00): привет!
про разницу между area:highway и highway=* + area=yes - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway

и еще, highway=pedestrian - тег для пешеходных улиц и площадей (как Арбат). Так что здесь в любом случае уместнее тег highway=footway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#%D0%9A%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2
velomeloman (2022-10-12 07:55:31+00:00): Спасибо. Буду применять.
catdreamer (2022-10-12 09:25:15+00:00): 您所修改的是測量點的名稱，山名已另有標示
Kovoschiz (2022-10-12 08:56:34+00:00): Please don't add `ele=` to `=ridge`. This doesn't make sense.
mueschel (2022-11-05 15:39:40+00:00): Hi,
what does 'artifial_path' mean, apart from the spelling mistake? This tag isn't used in other places.
SekeRob (2022-11-05 16:03:13+00:00): artificial_path means that it's a inferred path way in garage buildings / underground parkings from (oneway) entrances to exits.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/artificial_path

Picked it up in one or the other OSM wiki.

Not Used anywhere else? According turbopass most uses in UK.

And typos are my forté ;P)
mueschel (2022-11-05 16:08:42+00:00): Right, you missed two letters so it didn't show up in Taginfo's "similar" tab...

"artificial" sounds strange - all roads are artificial in some sense. I'd rather go with the "virtual" tag that is used more often already.
SekeRob (2022-11-05 16:46:32+00:00): OK, in fact virtual=yes has a better ring to it, in fact a certain person who maps Disney LA might really like this qualifier.

I'll run turbo overpass and make the adjustment where I did in Italy, maybe a half dozen times, location by location else the community explodes over the large Bbox ;O)

Somewhere that page where I lifted that artificial_path needs a comment suffix.
Neuwessi11 (2022-11-28 21:19:05+00:00): Hi Dennis Beckers,
auch an der Giesenkirchner bemängelt Osmose das inkonsistente footway=sidewalk.
Grüße!
Neuwessi11
aTarom (2022-10-11 15:32:15+00:00): Hola xafamons,
se han quedado los siguientes tags extraños:
Alcadena=Alcadena
Lloseta=Lloseta
Mallorca=Mallorca
Tramuntana=Tramuntana
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102888660/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102881502/history
en este último también un
name=no name
no es necesario especificar que un sendero no tiene nombre pero si se quiere se puede utilizar un
noname=yes
me dices algo si puedes de los tags extraños citados

Te dejo el enlace al nuevo foro por si quieres preguntar algo a la comunidad
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
o si prefieres algo más informal, el canal de Telegram
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://t.me/osmcat

Saludos y gracias por editar
Frans S (2022-10-12 14:01:58+00:00): Hello again. Please focus on simple buildings in the open area.  These are High flats which needs to be mapped on a different way. You just mapped a small piece of a roof. Btw, another mapper already mapped them accurate.
Again, best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127362497
jeslop (2022-10-11 14:34:53+00:00): Hola JoseJerezCharpas.

Has eliminado una calle, para sustituirla por una acequia. En el mapa que utilizas como base se ve perfectamente que hay una calle. ¿Hay alguna razón para este cambio? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198737116#map=18/36.94312/-2.12893

De la misma manera usas un level, cuando menos, extraño.

Si por debajo de la calle va una acequia, debes mapear las dos características, no eliminar una de ellas.

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-10-16 17:32:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/270997876. what is the meaning of the tag
CGBCode = 885600
? If this is a reference code, please use ref:NL:….
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-12-08 05:13:08+00:00): Tem cuidado com a tag da wiki, em objectos que não são singulares usa a tag subject:wikipedia=
linked wikidata entry (Q37083) is about an animal or plant (and not an individual one), so it is very unlikely to be correct
subject:wikipedia=* tag would be probably better (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links for full list of what else may be applicable)
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-12-08 05:14:55+00:00): aliás o mais correto é o uso de
taxon:wikidata	
taxon:wikipedia
Reino Baptista (2022-12-08 11:22:04+00:00): Obrigado.
Já mudei os meus ficheiros de presets do JOSM de acordo com https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links
Princess_Aurora (2022-10-12 14:42:16+00:00): Hello Will Pittenger;
I noticed you split the first segment for some streets and made it a "link", in various areas in UAE, Kindly Could you explain more about why you split these segments and made them links?
Examples links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102892181
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102892180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102893117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102903674
Regards
Princess_Aurora
Will Pittenger (2022-10-12 15:01:26+00:00): The rendering engine gets confused if a way that isn't a link merges with a *_link.  So the standard is to have the link extend somewhat.
Princess_Aurora (2022-10-13 13:38:07+00:00): Hello Will Pittenger;
Thank you for your comment, Can you explain a little about The rendering engine gets you mean and How you can catch this issue?
Regards
Princess_Aurora
Will Pittenger (2022-10-13 13:46:11+00:00): Mostly, somethings just stick out to me.  In some cases, a residential road will interrupt a ramp.  You may have troubles noticing the same issues.
sara qasem (2022-10-19 09:49:27+00:00): Hello Will Pittenger;
Thank you for your response, I did a deep search about change classification based on the rendering but I found that in OSM Wiki the best practice is to give the highway a classification based on the importance of the road:
(The value of the key helps indicate the importance of the highway within the road network as a whole)
(In short, the general definition of highway=* should be changed to importance for the road grid (hierarchical position in the interconnecting network) instead of physical attributes).
I think it would be better to keep the osm data consistent and  revert back those changes
Here you can read more about classification:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Highway_key_voting_importance

Regards,
Sara
Ariel70 (2024-02-28 12:27:46+00:00): Way Zondek (648805583) should have tag junction=roundabout
ar58 (2024-02-28 12:40:50+00:00): Hi, Thanks, I Fixed It.
pjvds (2022-10-12 10:25:28+00:00): Deze edit had in kleinere stukjes gemogen.
eggie (2022-10-12 11:10:50+00:00): Dag pjvds..

Toch even gekeken.. De consensus is om winkels.. b&b s e.d. bij te taggen op de adresnode en niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Dus ook geen adressen nogmaals toevoegen.
Kijk je nog even?

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-10-12 11:12:20+00:00): Zou er echt name=Pluimvee op de schuren horen?
pjvds (2022-10-12 11:12:41+00:00): Goed punt Eggie, ik zal het op die manier intekenen
eggie (2022-10-12 11:14:12+00:00): Top!
pjvds (2022-10-12 11:28:36+00:00): Ik heb de pluimvee name tags ook verwijderd. Ben er vrij zeker van dat die schuren niet zo heten.

Dank weer Eggie
eggie (2022-10-12 11:31:40+00:00): Denk t ook 😀
btwhite92 (2022-10-12 00:33:20+00:00): Hey, just a heads up that this changeset removed a couple ways that in turn broke a number of relations (county boundaries, USFS boundaries, forest landcover). I'll have this fixed shortly, but in the future please do not delete ways unless you are certain what you are doing, especially when they belong to large relations. 

Thanks, 
Bradley
vicb (2022-10-12 01:01:40+00:00): Oops sorry, thanks for fixing that
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-26 14:26:07+00:00): Is it a discussed import?

If yes - can you link OSM Wiki page of that import?

(and please, include such link in future edits)
Msiipola (2022-10-26 14:52:09+00:00): Yes, it's a ongoing import and it has been approved several years ago.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Sweden_highway_import

Please ask the team leader about details:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/torger

I don't understand your comment about including link. I have include upload comments according the import instructions.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-26 15:52:30+00:00): > I have include upload comments according the import instructions. 

In such case import instructions are deficient and badly planned - import edits and bot edits should link back to documentation pages
Msiipola (2022-10-26 16:38:28+00:00): As I said, I'm not the lead of the project. If you have complaints how this project is controlled, please discuss this with user "torger". 
I only follow the instructions.
Msiipola (2022-10-26 16:45:40+00:00): Maybe you misunderstands how the work is done.
There is no automatic replacement of import data. Alla changes are done manually one by one, using the Swedish road database as a reference.
torger (2022-10-27 20:45:42+00:00): Hello Mateusz, the NVDB project has been ongoing for a couple of years and is well known in the Swedish OSM community and has been discussed according to the OSM process for imports. You can contact me if you have any questions. Note that it is not an traditional automated import, ie it's manual work, all road segments are merged manually, and manually changed as needed. 100 segments takes about 1 hour manual work to go through, in a city with complex pre-existing mapping, 4 hours. One medium-sized municipality takes about 60 - 80 hour manual work to go through. By not having to click out every node the work is about 10 times faster than 100% manual work, and we get more tags like speed limits and such from the high quality government provided open database NVDB. This is necessary to increase the quality of OSM mapping in Sweden as we have many rural areas with very low density of local mappers and thus poor pre-existing quality.

Because of the highly manual process, no special import accounts are used, just our normal accounts.

You can see the current progress here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Sweden_highway_import/Progress
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 07:05:09+00:00): @torget Can you modify instructions and ask people to link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Sweden_highway_import/Progress as part of changeset description or as an extra changeset tag?

This way this apparently discussed and welcome import can be distinguished from wild ones without bothering people with changeset comments
MarcoR (2022-10-12 10:18:47+00:00): Sì, è un doppione con meno nodi di https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46347672 (anche le etichette sono le stesse); è stata aggiunto (immagino per errore) con il changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125091725 e poi un altro utente l'ha attaccato al resto dei sentieri; stasera lo rimuovo, se vuoi farlo tu sei il benvenuto ;)

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-12 09:10:44+00:00): 1. Please don't cite random "online" source. `name=` is the common name in use by the public currently, not what you or someone or history think it should be. 
2. This was considered an `old_name=` by previous discussions. Please raise this issue again.
julcnx (2022-10-12 02:32:46+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! Could you please keep changesets at a country level? Makes it much easier to review local changes. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127366191
aceman444 (2022-10-13 21:06:36+00:00): Dakujem, ale zabudli ste zmenit proposed=tram na construction=tram, aby bolo jasne, co sa stavia.
eggie (2022-12-18 18:21:12+00:00): Beste Bert.. Zou je svp niet de landuse=residential aan de wegen willen plakken. 
Waarom layer=-1 op de landuse=residential?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-19 06:24:50+00:00): De landuse residential heb ik losgemaakt van de wegen.
Je hebt anders kans op schade als iemand iets gaat verscuiven. Alles komt mee.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183402882#map=17/52.29751/5.16545
Mvg
eggie
BertMule (2023-04-09 20:20:11+00:00): Dat is juist de bedoeling. Wijzigingen zijn gekoppeld, zodat de semantische koppeling ook bewaard blijft. Dat is dus juist makkelijker. Bovendien ziet het er logischer uit, met minder randfouten.

Ik vind dit geen handige wijziging. Ik laat het maar zo, want het is teveel moeite om dat te veranderen. En dat is precies het punt.

Van die layer heb ik geen idee. Misschien was het er al, ik gebruik dat zelden.

Nogmaals, ik wens niet te worden gevolgd, en over elk lullig detail in discussie te moeten gaan. Of wijzigingen opnieuw te moeten gaan maken.
user_5359 (2022-10-16 17:28:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/114357184. what is the meaning of the tag bui = 2? Did you mean building:levels=2?
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:11:06+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127425197
cytryn (2022-10-27 21:25:23+00:00): Cześć,
Mapowanie obszarów drogowych: (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102913595) jako highway=* + area=yes jest niepoprawne - typowo pod render i może generować sporo problemów z routingiem. Zamiast tego takie obszary oznaczamy jako area:highway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway).
Wyjątkiem są obszary highway=pedestrian, na których ruch pieszych może być wielokierunkowy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas
Dodatkowo - highway=pedestrian + area= yes nie jest przeznaczone dla typowych obszarów chodników (jak tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102913584) - te powinny być oznaczane jako area:highway=footway
Pozdrowienia
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-27 21:36:33+00:00): Hej, dzięki za komentarz!
area:highway=service zedytowałem aczkolwiek mam wątpliwość co do propozycji drugiej edycji. Podlinkowany chodnik jest elementem placu Szembeka a według wiki place tagujemy jako highway=pedestrian
cytryn (2022-10-27 22:00:59+00:00): Tu chodzi bardziej o place w rozumieniu obszarów, po których pieszy może się swobodnie poruszać w różnych kierunkach zamiast tylko "wzdłuż" jak na typowym chodniku. Każdy obiekt otagowany jako highway=* jest brany pod uwagę przez nawigacje (może z wyjątkiem highway=street_lamp ;) Większość aplikacji nie jest w stanie poprowadzić przez obszar takiego placu i będzie próbowała prowadzić po obrzeżach placu (wzdłuż linii obrysu), ale są też nieliczne nawigacje, które potrafią poprowadzić np. po najkrótszej drodze zawierającej się w obszarze highway=pedestrian i to m.in. właśnie dla nich uzupełnia się o area=yes na takich obszarach, żeby pomóc odróżnić je od liniowych highway=pedestrian (stosowanych na promedach/deptakach/ulicach gdzie dopuszczony jest wyłącznie ruch pieszy (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504277590)

Ogólnie: highway=* tam, gdzie ma być prowadzony routing, a area:highway do szczegółowego przedstawienia obrysów dróg. 

Niestety area:highway nie renderuje się na podstawowym stylu mapy, nad czym też ubolewam, ale już np. na polskich kafelkach, tj. https://tiles.osmapa.pl/ jest wizualizowane area:highway=footway.
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:49:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127367365
Thth (2024-01-10 15:17:39+00:00): steht weiterhin leer (survey).
artikel zum thema (paywall):
https://www.weser-kurier.de/bremen/bremen-brachen-grundstueck-an-bismarckstrasse-soll-zum-biomarkt-werden-doc7tm3599vtde1bpf1kmsy
maraf24 (2023-05-13 09:39:47+00:00): Wrong tagging, should be as before:
segregated=yes
footway:surface=fine_gravel
GinaroZ (2022-11-16 17:54:20+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, thanks for contributing however this has been reverted as we don't need to have the planning info mapped.
bxl-forever (2022-10-11 22:45:17+00:00): Hello,

We advise you to please upload your pending changes *before* moving to another place in the city.

This is to avoid ending up with large bounding boxes like the one you see here: some of us are reviewing recent changes in Brussels and your changes in two different locations are grouped together because you uploaded all of them at once.  This makes life harder for your fellow mappers.
Thovi98 (2022-10-12 06:31:44+00:00): Oh I didn't no!
Thanks for the advice, I will upload my changes directlyy from now.
eggie (2022-10-11 16:49:40+00:00): Dag Peter.. Lijkt me oke zo.
Dat pontje is gestopt toen die corona ellende begon. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-10-13 20:38:53+00:00): De ferry_terminal heb ik nog even verwijderd.
gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-11 16:08:48+00:00): Lijkt me oke..   foot=yes kan voor de duidelijkheid erbij. (overigens al default)

gravel is wellicht fine_gravel hier. 

Nog iets.. Hoe komen die fietsers door dat hek halverwege. ( Op het hek bicycle=yes foot=yes?) 
Hier wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface
Mapse
eggie
emersonveenstra (2022-10-11 17:04:20+00:00): Hi,

This is actually incorrect, link roads should only start where the road physically starts, it shouldn't include the turn lane. The correct way to indicate a michigan u-turn is to add the `turn:lanes` key on the road where the left turn lane is so that routers can move cars to the left lane. Without that, it's harder to give directions.
paco3346 (2022-10-11 18:28:07+00:00): Both the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan_Lefts) and an existing turn (the one immediately west of 68th ave) show it this way. Is there other documentation that states to not make it a separate way?
emersonveenstra (2022-10-11 18:56:43+00:00): So that wiki page (and the existing turn) are 8 years old and well out of date, predating support for `turn:lanes`. I'll update that wiki page with better examples, but for now, i think the best documentation is the example in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations, and it violates the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element rule because they're part of the same physical road.

Also, if you're pulling out of the service road here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/185739126#map=19/42.97247/-85.94898, your changes mean you can no longer use the u-turn immediately to the west, because they are now separated, which isn't accurate in the real world. using turn:lanes would fix that issue.
paco3346 (2022-10-11 19:08:08+00:00): Like before, thanks for the clarifications. I'll revert this and clean up that one I referenced as an example.
ruugie (2022-10-11 22:11:54+00:00): These buildings are all a few degrees off. May you please de-skew them?
kechan (2022-10-13 18:11:07+00:00): Yeah, appears so. I will de-skew them on my kechan account soon.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 09:54:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102919907/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
abakus_uploader (2022-10-11 22:31:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2023-01-05 17:33:42+00:00): cześć W1313
Twoje zmiany odbiagają od wersji oficjalnej. Czy były one dokonane na podstawie danych z terenu?
Frans S (2022-11-18 14:01:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
Please read this wiki how to map and tag highways. 
You tagged a local road as a tertiary highway, which means a connecting road between towns etc. Here unclassified is a better tag.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Best regards
Firefishy (2022-10-11 17:11:17+00:00): Remember edits are public ;-) We don't normally map the internal rooms as separate buildings.
Firefishy (2022-10-11 17:11:29+00:00): Welkom ;-)
muralito (2022-10-13 02:08:00+00:00): Hola. Gracias por el aporte. En los nombres no se usan abreviaturas.
Frans S (2022-10-13 13:07:57+00:00): Hello. A remark.
Please don't let borders of area cross buildings.
Bet regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127369166