piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:36:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mashin (2020-05-12 13:57:54+00:00): Hi, cities are not defined by population. These cities are defined by CT and are subsidiary to towns. That is why there are two admin levels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_in_Connecticut

Also some CDP are still active villages or boroughs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Mystic,_Connecticut
I don't understand why you go ahead and edit something without discussing it first. Btw are you at least from CT?
Heinz_V (2020-06-04 06:34:43+00:00): You added "name=building". Please delete all this nonsense.
nevw (2020-05-10 08:20:39+00:00): Hi inkmoooon
welcome to the OSM.If you prefer your buildings with square corners, the following advice is from
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/#the-essentials

"If the building should have square corners, make sure you trace it with square corners, or use the tool to square the corners (in English, shortcut q)"
kartler175 (2020-05-11 11:41:26+00:00): please check your edits:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-62.35042&lat=49.17843&zoom=10&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,ring_not_closed,
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-62.35042&lat=49.17843&zoom=10&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,ring_not_closed,
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-109.31697&lat=53.06874&zoom=9&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,ring_not_closed
ralley (2020-05-10 07:35:07+00:00): Please don't delete features and re-draw them - rather edit the existing feature so the history is not lost.  Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84957712
AkuAnakTimur (2020-05-10 04:30:30+00:00): These are all distance signs that includes the official name of this certain part of Federal Route 1 from the Works Department themselves.

Southbound: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2186054/5447/track-info

Northbound: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2184878/418/track-info
mueschel (2020-05-10 09:08:44+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. I found all the tags listed below introduced here yesterday. Please agree on one common spelling!

ref:sis_tipologia
ref:sisa:tipologia
ref:sisa_tipología
ref:sisa_topografia
ref_sisa_code
ref_sisa_codigo
ref_sisa_tipologia
juanblas09 (2020-05-10 16:14:26+00:00): Hi mueschel, thanks for the observation, the official tags are "ref:sisa_codigo" y "ref:sisa_tipologia", now I'm going to correct it
ignaciolep (2020-05-10 22:06:17+00:00): Hi mueschel, I would be great if you can explain us how did you find all thouse variations. I would like to run that validation when our mapathon finish. Thanks!
mueschel (2020-05-11 08:07:00+00:00): Hi,
you can use Taginfo to find similar keys:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref%3Asisa_tipologia#similar
It lists only close similarities, but not if they are too different.

The mistakes are also likely to appear in the list of keys that where not used before:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm (This is where I spotted them)

Currently it seems there are
ref.sisa_codigo
ref:sisa_code
ref:sisa_codigo_2
ref_sisa_codigo
ref_sisa_tipologia
ignaciolep (2020-05-11 13:48:03+00:00): Thanks!!
Владимир К (2020-06-04 17:44:43+00:00): Hi!
please don't add descriptive names like "bus stop"
freeExec (2020-05-10 08:17:27+00:00): вы что-то не то делаете, это населённые пункты, не нужно в них про церковь писать. ваши правки отменены
Warin61 (2020-05-12 06:14:40+00:00): Error on wood - way 791645085.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10734&lat=-27.48594&zoom=14
eggie (2020-05-10 11:15:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
boototter (2020-05-11 12:29:07+00:00): dit staat genoteerd als onderdeel wegen Gouden Leeuw maar betreft Groenhoven.
Verwarring kan eenvoudig ontstaan, doordat de naam Gouden Leeuw naast de opritten bij parkeergarage GL ook nog in het midden staat, deels in GL- , deels in GH gebied
boototter (2020-05-11 12:44:37+00:00): aanvulling: m.n. voor ambulances is dit een essentieel verschil. Over het Gaasperparkpad kunnen ze niet door de doorgang onder het 100-200 deel van Groenhoven., de verwarring is frequent. Gouden Leeuw is juist voor ambulances met dit pad (behalve de 900 en 1000-nummers) niet bereikbaar.
eggie (2020-05-11 13:38:03+00:00): Oke... daarom is lokale kennis van groot belang. 
Overigens gaat VR Amsterdam ook op termijn over op OSM met een speciale routing app. 
Ik weet niet hoe ver ze nu zijn. Nog geen VR mappers bezig gezien in jouw buurt. 
VR Twente en IJsselland zijn al ver gevorderd. emergency=yes wordt dan op essentiële paden en bollard gezet. Ook de hoogtes en breedte van doorgangen.
boototter (2020-05-11 18:16:59+00:00): Het lijkt me zinvol, om in de komende tijd al die paden in de buurt eens langs te lopen op fout complex. Maar ook> vlak boven dit blok is een pad dat bijv. opeens stopt op de kaart.
Op het Ganzenhoefpad zijn bij beide complexen  hoge vluchtheuvels gebouwd om autoverkeer te ontmoedigen. Graag een tip hoe dat aan te geven. 
Is het zinvol, om nu al bij de daarvoor gebruikte paden de tag emergency te zetten, of dwarsboom ik daarmee de VR mappers?
eggie (2020-05-11 18:41:32+00:00): De emergency tags op footways en pedestrians zou ik gewoon aan de VRT overlaten.
Wel natuurlijk een emergency-exit naar bv de snelweg of een spoortracé. 
drempels, tafels,  punaises e.d tag je als 
traffic_calming =  Zie wiki voor de mogelijkheden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
user_2066394 (2020-05-10 11:14:24+00:00): bitte geschlossene geschäfte nicht einfach löschen, sondern mit disused: markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84960837
ralfrr (2020-05-10 11:50:51+00:00): Kann ich gerne machen, nur wird es an der Stelle dann unübersichtlich, der Laden wechselt ständig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84960837
user_2066394 (2020-05-10 13:21:17+00:00): wichtig ist nur die jeweils aktuelle nutzung: momentan ist dort wohl leerstand, also mit disused: kennzeichnen. wenn dann ein neuer laden reinkommt, trägt man den wieder regulär ein.
L'imaginaire (2020-05-10 09:35:56+00:00): Pfff ... :-)
user_5359 (2020-05-10 16:42:59+00:00): Hello,
please notice addr:country=US, addr:state=HI for Hawaii.
gscscnd (2020-09-21 18:24:37+00:00): Czy droga <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85316191> nie powinna być oznaczona jako highway=cycleway, tak jak drogi <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85316182> i <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802096420>, które łączy?
literan (2020-05-11 17:33:59+00:00): bad edit too
user_5359 (2020-05-10 16:42:50+00:00): Hello,
please notice addr:country=US, addr:state=HI for Hawaii.
Carnildo (2020-05-12 05:49:42+00:00): Has something changed in the past two years?  The last time I visited the Folsom Farm site, the road leading there was still very much a dirt road.
Greg_Rose (2020-05-12 06:50:26+00:00): I'll be honest - I meant to change it to unpaved. When I went there last Summer almost all of it was graveled, with an ungraveled bit in the middle.
Greg_Rose (2020-05-12 07:51:18+00:00): Thx for catching that - I fixed it. My notes from last summer are absolute crap. :(
Greg_Rose (2020-05-12 07:55:04+00:00): So please let me know if you see anything else I may have screwed up.
user_2066394 (2020-05-10 09:51:01+00:00): was bedeutet dauerhaft geschlossen? für corona/covid19 gibt es definierte öffnungszeiten-tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours:covid19

wenn der betrieb tatsächlich für immer aufgegeben wurde, bitte nicht einfach löschen sondern mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84961633
schirinowski (2020-05-10 17:26:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, disused war mir leider nicht bekannt. Ich werde mich zukünftig dran halten und mit disused markieren.
Die Kaffeestube wird tatsächlich nicht mehr öffnen (vgl. https://www.dewezet.de/region/bad-pyrmont/luegde_artikel,-aus-fuer-krusfelder-kaffeestube-_arid,2621337.html).

Allerdings bin ich jetzt leider etwas überfordert, wie ich meine Löschung rückgängig machen kann um die Kaffeestube stattdessen mit disused zu markieren. Can you help, please? Danke!
user_2066394 (2020-05-10 18:24:59+00:00): das ist der vorteil von disused: , die node bleibt erhalten und kann weiterbearbeitet werden. habs kurz manuell nachgetragen, mein hinweis war mehr eine anregung für zukünftige änderungen :-) gutes gelingen weiterhin
schirinowski (2020-05-11 18:00:53+00:00): Prima, danke!
literan (2020-05-11 17:33:01+00:00): bad edit. Correct tag is name:en
Luzandro (2021-05-02 17:50:23+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier vor einem Jahr bei einigen Straßen eine eigenartige Kombination gesetzt, mit construction=living_street + highway=residential ?
Eebie (2020-08-22 15:13:42+00:00): You added some paths in Milmort as Chemin N° 6 and Sentier n° 12 through fields and over highway A601 and even added an pedestrian passing on this highway. According to recent SPW ortho some paths that you added don't exist. I added 'fixme' where I met this. It is not a good idea to add paths that don't exist since a long time. Please check and correct where you are not sure that those paths still exist.
user_5359 (2020-05-10 16:42:36+00:00): Hello,
please notice addr:country=US, addr:state=HI for Hawaii.
mueschel (2020-05-10 09:11:54+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. It looks like you used all these tags listed below instead of 'source:name:oc'.

sname:oc
souce:name:oc	
source:anme:oc
source:name;oc
ssource:name:oc


Enjoy OSM!
user_5359 (2020-05-10 16:40:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
baptistemm (2020-05-11 06:16:33+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention pour le tag cuisine, bio n'est pas une valeur correcte, cela doit désigner la spécialité (asian, pizza. ...) Pouvez-vous corriger en regardant la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine ?

Pour dire qu'un restaurant fait du bio (exclusivement ou partiellement) il faut utiliser Organic https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:organic

Pouvez-vous corriger ?

Merci
Attikus (2020-05-13 15:12:55+00:00): Bonjour Baptistemm, 

Je vous remercie pour vos conseils, la modification a été effectuée !

Bien à vous,
baptistemm (2020-05-13 15:56:36+00:00): je viens de verifier, c'est bon
crisitunity (2020-05-19 16:50:23+00:00): Dear Swathi,

why are you mapping the forest as "shingles"?
I can't see on Maxar what you seem to see.

Kind regards
stephankn (2021-01-18 21:30:59+00:00): maybe an issue with your editor? way 802107405 had multiple self-intersections, making the polygon invalid. I fixed it.
10992 (2020-12-28 16:37:42+00:00): Is the grass by the Tesco Express really called "Linslade Tesco Express"?  I've never seen it called that, and it seems odd.  Where did the information come from?
Hopla57 (2020-05-19 14:08:58+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai constaté que vous avez changé le type de voie pour le Mettis.
Or, le Mettis n'est pas un bus guidé (c'est-à-dire avec un rail central comme l'actuel "tram" de Nancy, ou avec des roulettes sur le côté) mais un un bus à haut niveau de service (BHNS), c'est-à-dire avec une voie dédiée ; ce n'est qu'un autobus comme un autre, doublement articulé.

Pouvez-vous remettre en highway=service ? bus=designated n'est pas nécessaire non plus car psv=yes et access=no remplissent ce rôle : accès interdit sauf PSV (transport en commun)

Plus d'infos ici, dans la documentation, et avec des photos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=bus%20guideway?uselang=fr
Et un article Wikipédia : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobus_guid%C3%A9

Bonne journée.
zerock54 (2020-05-19 14:47:10+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est corrigé, désolé et merci pour les infos !
Bonne journée
Hopla57 (2020-05-19 14:50:53+00:00): Pas de soucis, on est là pour s'entraider :-)

Et bienvenue dans ce formidable projet qu'est OpenStreetMap !
eggie (2020-05-10 09:08:47+00:00): Yep.. dat is m .. motor_vehicle = no is default.. 
Net als foot en bicycle=yes .. kwaad kan het niet. Zie de wiki...  Note is bedoeld voor andere mappers.. dog=no zou ook kunnen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-10 09:16:46+00:00): Denk eerder dat die hond dat paaltje ergens anders voor gebruikt.
Lantisat (2020-05-11 07:10:59+00:00): hahaha, dank je voor de reacties weer en ga aan de gang om het netjes (in een keer goed!) te doen.
Britzz (2020-05-10 16:06:36+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84963728
Scout Jens (2023-03-01 17:27:03+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe, vielen Dank für Deinen Einsatz zur Verbesserung der Daten für OSM.
Ich habe hier mal wieder gesehen, dass Du die Richtung von Ampeln falsch einträgst. Die Richtung zeigt an, wer von der Ampel betroffen ist. Du hast es gerade andersherum eingetragen.
Viele Grüße, Jens
Cristoffs (2021-01-13 17:20:36+00:00): Na podstawie tego typu dokumentów nie nanosimy zmian w OSM. Proszę wycofaj tą zmianę. Inwestycje  kolejowe są nanoszone dopiero po uzyskaniu minimum decyzji środowiskowej.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 11:42:06+00:00): Hi. This is to confirm the tag refers to highway exit in the context of `highway=motorway_junction`. In many jurisdictions around the world, only exits are numbered, not the entire junction. It is meaningless to use `junction:ref=` here. Moreover, I find the use of `junction:ref=` dubious, as its proposal (now at undefined status) focusing on exits conflicts with the more established  `junction=`. This definition also impedes its use on ordinary roads with named junctions but with no numbered exits.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 11:46:09+00:00): The proposal itself seems self-contradictory on "Why not deprecate motorway_junction?" and "Why name it junction:ref?" as well.
mueschel (2020-05-10 11:53:45+00:00): 'junction:ref' is an established tag, used 30000 times world-wide. If you want to change its meaning or replace it by another tag, please discuss it on the tagging mailing list and write a proposal for it.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 12:51:03+00:00): I didn't change `junction:ref=`. I add a new tag for the time being to clarify its use locally. It would be misapplied here, as a "junction" can have multiple exits associated with it.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 12:52:47+00:00): I don't see how using `motorway_junction` as the key, that exists in the value of `highway=motorway_junction` would be a problem either.
mueschel (2020-05-10 13:00:24+00:00): But that is exactly the definition of junction:ref - it is the number of an individual exit. It doesn't matter if several have the same ref or each exit lane has its own ref. The tag is always the same.

Introducing another, new, undocumented, undiscussed tag makes the situation just a lot worse.
Please stick to the common rules on how to change meaning of keys and how to introduce new ones.
You can add whatever keys you like, but they are of no use if no other user has the faintest idea what they might mean.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 15:44:10+00:00): "You can add whatever keys you like, but they are of no use if no other user has the faintest idea what they might mean."
Would a common user not likely to interpret `junction:ref=` as the `ref=` of a `junction:*`? It would be more unexpected if  the meaning of "motorway junction" is suddenly imposed. I find it more possible that a user that knows what `highway=motorway_junction` to understand what I'm trying mark for the moment. I myself have no idea what to do when I try add the `ref=` for the signalized intersections and traffic circles with `junction=` - it is only when I change to `traffic_signals:ref=` does this become possible (because the roads themselves carry no `ref=`. Would you consider `junction=` as "new, undocumented, undiscussed"? What "common rules" are there for keys that obviously conflict with each other? Again, I didn't "change meaning" of `junction:ref=` yet (I try not to conflict with it yet as well). As for "how to introduce new ones", would you consider a temporary sub-tag of `highway=motorway_junction` signfiicantly "new"?
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 15:45:39+00:00): So I don't see why would you are eager to remove a harmless tag that obviously means something.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 15:47:01+00:00): Let me ask in another way, if I add `junction:ref=` to numbered intersections and traffic circles, would you oppose?
Kovoschiz (2020-05-10 15:52:38+00:00): As for the the definition of `junction:ref=`, I must also point out that I observe the use of `junction:ref=` for entries as well. Clearly, there's something ambiguous about the tag that deserves a critical and productive treatment.
mueschel (2020-05-10 16:05:07+00:00): Please discuss these tagging ideas in the community. A changeset comment is not the right place.
ToniE (2020-05-10 10:03:12+00:00): Hello and welcome to OMS.

I don't think that this here is actually a Wilderness-Hut, at least not with repect to the definitions in OSM.

What's the reason that you decided on tagging like this?
I could see only a Scheune on the Aerial Images and mapped this as buildung=barn and that's what you tagged to the node.

Best regards
Toni
ToniE (2020-05-10 10:07:16+00:00): Kindly also have a look here:

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
ToniE (2020-06-01 11:36:24+00:00): Hello,

may I ask why you repeatedly map a wilderness hut here? I doubt that here is actually a real "wildeness hut" in the sense of OSM.

Please explain.

Thanks and best regards.
Toni
berndw (2020-05-10 10:39:04+00:00): Hallo Malouk

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge.

Ich habe nur ein paar Hinweise ;-)
Zuallererst, stell bitte die Hintergrundbilder auf ESRI um, die sind in der Region lagegenauer und besser erkennbar.

BTW: Die Lage der Hauptstraße in den Daten entspricht den ESRI-Bildern, also nicht verschieben ;-)

Auf den ESRI-Bildern kann man erkennen, dass das Hauptgebäude rechtwinklig ist, drücke einfach nach Markieren des Gebäudes auf 's' dann richtet iD das Gebäude. Zweitens kann man den von Dir gezeichneten Anbau nicht erkennen, sondern nur ein paar kleinere Bauwerke
Was ist denn hier richtig?
Um Nachfragen zu vermeiden, kann man einen ausführlicheren Kommentar an das Changeset schreiben, z.B. "Umrisse nach Realität angepasst, Luftbilder veraltet"

Könntest Du die Gebäude korrigieren?

Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung

Bernd
SHARCRASH (2020-05-16 15:53:18+00:00): Hi!
Can you explain me what type of way this is and its name, please?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802118381
nyberroithur1968 (2020-05-16 18:30:54+00:00): The name is Lara Croft 1/4 and it is a MTB single track.
SHARCRASH (2020-05-19 09:05:56+00:00): OK, OSM is not a Strava like type of service. We are serious about mapping so names unique to Strava are not allowed, we only add elements which exist for real and only local official or popular names. Anyway for your info, that segment is not anymore in Strava's explorer. 

Also that path you added was connected to a bench, not to the track, so the routing capabilities were broken, I corrected.

If you are interested in adding MTB elements so that the trail becomes known to mtbikers and does not disappear because of vegetation, you can add the tags
- mtb:scale=1-6 (overall scale difficulty)
- mtb:scale:imba=1-5 (international system scale difficulty)
- mtb:scale:uphill=1-4 (scale difficulty for climbs)

More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
nyberroithur1968 (2020-05-19 09:18:01+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, i'm just a beginner and you seem to be more expert than me with mapping!
I'm using Garmin to plan tours and Garmin uses OSM map. That's the reason I added this track, not because of Strava. The name I don't care what it's called honestly, but OSM was asking for one so I put this one.
I see you've changed the connection of the track to the main path, but it's not correct. I used a gpx file captured with my garmin to draw the track, so not sure why the routing capabilities were broken. The connection to the path is after the intersection, the bench should be on the right corner of the intersection.

I'll see how to add these tags!

I
SHARCRASH (2020-05-19 09:52:28+00:00): Welcome! Yeah i saw you are a beginner. You added a "path" (single trails, narrow paths...) 😉 A track is the larger way suitable for 4 wheeled vehicles (2 visible trails, forestry/agricultural vehicles...) and unmaintained, often bare ground or raw material/degraded. Indeed it's important to respect the tags adopted by consensus by OMS's community so that everybody have the same references. You can find all info in OSM's Wiki.

OK i understand for the name. It is actually suggested by the OSM editor you used (iD), the interface makes it available so that people have it easy to edit, but you are not forced to add one.

The routing capabilities are not about the recorded GPS trace, rather how a system can route a planned course in a network of ways, like your GPS device is giving you the directions or a car GPS planner. That's why it needs to be connected to the network of highways (other elemnts work liek "leisure=track" (motorized vehicules racing course)

I enhanced the position of the trails and bench because i have other sources i can work with but i might be wrong since it's not always easy to see it on them or are inaccurate or outdated (for example Geoportail.lu Topo). OK thanks for the precision in the connection, i had seen also there a connection but there are so many ditches in that area. I will replace the bench also.
nyberroithur1968 (2020-05-19 11:26:43+00:00): The reason for various trail connection position could also be that the location of the path is not permanent and that it changes when trees fall etc. as they don't really maintain that forrest. same for the bridges above the water channels, when it gets floaded, they swim away as they are made of wood pieces.
Is there a way to qualify this path as such, i.e. not permanent? It's probably also used by hunters during hunting season as there's a lot of wilderness (deers, boars,) in that area.
kapazao (2020-05-10 11:09:48+00:00): Hello, can you give any reference about this camp_site?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84964859
wegspotter (2020-06-11 13:56:49+00:00): We stayed there in 2014 as a part of the community Casa Calabaza. Perhaps the site is closed now?