piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-07-04 08:56:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
blackboxlogic (2020-07-01 20:30:50+00:00): This node is in Portland, but you added an address in Kennebunk? Is the node in the wrong place or is the address wrong?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87416594
johnpaglio (2020-07-02 12:20:47+00:00): Oh shoot! This location has closed and they have moved to a different city.
iandees (2020-07-01 20:20:02+00:00): Hi! As this hasn't happened yet and is just a proposal, please don't modify the map. The map should reflect reality as it is now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87417065
joost schouppe (2020-07-14 15:25:57+00:00): Enkele opmerkingen:
* zeer fijn dat je de import combineert met terreinopnames van POI :)
* GRB-gebouwen bevatten niet alle addressen uit het CRAB, zie bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821957512 . Dit heeft ook een adres op de Vlamingstraat. Controleer in een complexe stedelijke omgeving dus zeker de volledigheid. Via de CRAB import tool, of via de online viewer https://crab.agiv.be/Lara/ (je hebt een account nodig, maar kunt die zelf aanmaken). In dit soort situaties kan je best twee adres-punten aanmaken ipv op het gebouw zelf het adres zetten
diphty0 (2020-07-14 19:34:28+00:00): Ik kreeg die CRAB import eerst niet te werken maar na JOSM te updaten werkt het wel, ik zal mijn vorige imports eens moeten controleren of er meer adressen verkeerd zijn.

Wat zou ik bijvoorbeeld doen voor Vlamingstraat 2-8? De GRB zet die als 2;4;6;8 voor hetzelfde gebouw maar de CRAB Import zet die apart met wat afstand allemaal op hetzelfde gebouw. Wat is best dan?
Bedankt voor de tips
joost schouppe (2020-07-15 07:06:38+00:00): Voor Vlamingstraat 2-8: beide lijken me correct. Ik ben alleszins fan van het volledig oplijsten van alle huisnummers, omdat 2-8 in zeldzame gevallen niet eenduidig omgezet kan worden naar de achterliggende huisnummers. Ik ga ervan uit dat de huisnummers in dit geval voor een reden op meerdere punten staan in CRAB; wellicht komen ze ongeveer overeen met meerdere ingangen. Zelf zou ik dus eerder voor de punten gaan hier. Maar ik denk dat andere mensen dat enkel zouden doen als je ze heel duidelijk exact op de ingang kunt leggen
BCNorwich (2020-07-03 19:26:29+00:00): Hi, You are making many duplicated highways this seriously disrupts routeing software that uses OSM data.
Please see here and make corrections :-http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.85674&lat=52.89952&zoom=18&overlays=duplicated_edges

If you need help please just ask in another comment here.
BCNorwich (2020-07-04 06:11:04+00:00): Even sections of the two razed railway lines are duplicated.
maraf24 (2020-07-05 20:57:07+00:00): Pełny komentarz jest w następnym zestawie i brzmi: "poprawa kagtegorii dróg; secondary-bez sensu dla ślepych dóg; właściwy stan torów w Hajnówce"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-07-07 02:04:58+00:00): exatamente neste ponto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7511513158 voce deletou uma via que eu havia criado, alem de deletar mais elementos que outros usuarios criaram. por favor, redesenhe a via para que nao seja necessario a reversão de todo o conjunto de mudanças.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-07-07 02:15:00+00:00): ok, eu consegui reverter apenas a deleção da via, por favor, pare de apagar objetos assim
Frans S (2020-07-02 11:41:11+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings are below the quality HOTOSM stands for.
None of the buildings you mapped are well squared. See my PM direct to you
Best regards and keep mapping
mueschel (2020-08-05 08:37:23+00:00): Please check the tagging of these nodes, they got several tags that shouldn't appear in OSM:
editor 	opengislab, postes referencia
elev 	959.798
fuente 	IGAC (Contrato 2932/2008)
topolusitania (2020-07-03 18:11:08+00:00): Olá Podes concretizar o nome e a finalidade do terreno ? Não deve ser antes classificado como "construção" ?
topolusitania (2020-07-03 20:13:44+00:00): Corrigido em parte. Acrescentado edificio e parque de estacionamento
aweech (2020-07-02 13:24:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have deleted a whole bunch of ways that represent objects that are visible on aerial imagery. You deleted driveways, rock walls, and class vi roads that are clearly visible. The evidence is stacked against your actions. Can you prove that this isn't vandalism?
Treetops (2020-07-02 19:31:07+00:00): One driveway was deleted. It was marked by GPS of Amazon driver (through no trespassing sign) and not by imagery. The driveway is not visible by air even in winter due to evergreen tree cover.

The roadways I removed are either in the incorrect location (Old Foster Rd), not a public way and incorrect location (north side of Old Avery Road), incorrect label (two sections of Old Avery Road). The creator must have simply overlayed these paths by trusting others' incorrect data sources.

The stone wall areas removed are on private lands and (at least not all of the sections) cannot be viewed by air even when there is no foliage. 

The walls are no as straight as published and there is no actual wall in areas where they were indicated.
gscscnd (2020-07-04 10:03:44+00:00): Punkt <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7674796041> jest zbędny, ponieważ dane adresowe znajdują się już na budynku <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454629490>.
valhikes (2023-08-27 19:18:25+00:00): For Carter Meadows Trail, was this actually from FS topo or data download from their clearinghouse? There's currently a line from Strava that avoids the private property to the west, so it looks like it might have been rerouted.
Adam Schneider (2023-08-29 04:34:35+00:00): I assume you mean Cooper Meadows... at any rate, that was three years ago, so I don't remember for sure, but yeah, it does look like the path I drew follows the USFS data pretty closely.  I see the current Strava line you're talking about... maybe that's a new trail alignment, but it could also just be one person taking a shortcut?

(Meanwhile, I'd love to properly map those private property parcels, but when we tried to do that a few years ago, the complexity of the Klamath NF multipolygon relation broke the OSM renderer!)
user_2066394 (2020-07-17 19:35:28+00:00): Warum bekommt die Pension Luipold ein leisure=park?
eggie (2020-07-02 06:23:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


MVG,
Eggie
Robercin (2020-07-05 09:12:37+00:00): Skoro już miałeś ochotę zmienić tu grade1 na grade2, to trzeba było od razu to samo zrobić też na takich samych drogach do takich samych wiatraków w odległości kilometr i 2 km na południe od tego miejsca, bo teraz jest właśnie bałagan.
Robercin (2020-07-05 09:12:42+00:00): Skoro już miałeś ochotę zmienić tu grade1 na grade2, to trzeba było od razu to samo zrobić też na takich samych drogach do takich samych wiatraków w odległości kilometr i 2 km na południe od tego miejsca, bo teraz jest właśnie bałagan.
maraf24 (2020-07-05 20:52:33+00:00): Autorem bałaganu jest ten, który dał tu paved.
SomeoneElse (2020-07-02 00:11:55+00:00): ... and bridleways south of Danby from survey as well, since that was the GPS that I happened to have loaded at the time.
BeKri (2020-07-03 08:13:48+00:00): Servus wurzelast,
du hast die
Budrio Allee in Budrio-Allee
umbenahmst.
Gilt dann auch für den südlichen Teil ?
Hast Du ne Quelle, was jetzt stimmt ?
Sie sind sich ja mal wieder nicht einig
ob mit oder ohne Strich
Gruss und hapy tagging
derBeKri
user_2066394 (2020-07-03 13:33:19+00:00): wow, da war ich von einem klassischen rechtschreibfehler ausgegangen, aber ich stell mich schon mal drauf ein, das wieder zurückzuändern :-)
BeKri (2020-07-03 14:24:57+00:00): Muss nicht sein ...
wenn Du hier schaust
http://81.190.82.62:31337/QA_map/mismatched_street_names_de.html

Strich oder Nicht-Strich,
dass ist OFT die Frage,
deshalb ist mir das ja aufgefallen ;-)))

Aber "Eichenau Budrio-Allee" in
Tante Google gibt dann noch ne schreibweise: Budrioallee
aber des ist sicher falsch.
literan (2020-07-02 15:22:02+00:00): убрать за собой забыли. Откатил
Frans S (2020-07-02 11:33:08+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings are below the quality HOTOSM stands for.
many buildings you have  mapped are not squared. See my PM direct to you
Best regards and keep mapping
maposm (2020-07-02 20:25:09+00:00): Hallo Hustensaftjüngling und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Grundsätzlich sehen seine Ergänzungen hier ganz gut aus. Da ich hier keine Ortskenntnis habe, kann ich dir vor allem zur Einschätzung der Wegbeschaffenheit nur begrenzt (nach Betrachten von Luftbildern) Rückmeldung geben.

Die Werte für "tracktype" und "smoothness" passen zumindest zum Eindruck nach Luftbildbetrachtung. Es wirkt so, als könnte man hier vielleicht auch "schlechtere" Werte rechtfertigen (grade 4 statt 3 / very bad statt bad). Dagegen halte ich den Wert "mtb:scale=3" sehr wahrscheinlich für unpassend. Laut OSM-Wiki [1] sollte dieser Wert für "verblockte Singletrails mit vielen größeren Felsbrocken" verwendet werden. Ich vermute mal, dass hier eher mtb:scale=0 oder mtb:scale=1 passen würde.

Sonst ist mir noch aufgefallen, dass der Verlauf / die Lage des südlichen Wegabschnitts gemäß Luftbilder ein klein wenig ungenau eingezeichnet ist. Wobei die Luftbilder auch veraltet oder nicht ganz lagegenau sein können. Oder hattest du den Weg als GPS-Track aufgenommen?

Dann "verklebst" du Punkte des Weges mit der Ackerfläche bzw. dem Wald. Das heißt, dass der Weg und die Landflächen gemeinsame Punkte besitzen. Das ist in diesem Fall eigentlich eher unerwünscht. Du kannst die Punkte im iD-Editor auftrennen, indem du in Rechtsklick auf die Punkte machst und dann auf die in engegengesetzte Richtung zeigende Pfeile ("Trennen") auswählst.

Viele Grüße
maposm

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale
AkuAnakTimur (2020-07-03 09:43:41+00:00): Ground truth from 2016 definitely screams an unclassified highway

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/419055457
MapNCheese7 (2020-07-07 16:50:12+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur, I agree with you here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419055457 does fit best as unclassified. Thanks!
abakus_uploader (2020-07-02 22:32:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscscnd (2020-07-04 10:13:20+00:00): Do poprawy/usunięcia mogą być tagi maxspeed*.
geoaria (2021-03-07 18:05:27+00:00): خواهشمند است از خرابکاری در نقشه و تغییر درجه راه ها خود داری کنید ، قبل از تغییر درجه راه ها شرایط هر تگ را در ویکی مطالعه کنید راههای که شما به بزرگراه تغییر داده اید حائز شرایط بزرگراهی نیستند. دقت کنید
geoaria (2021-03-07 18:06:06+00:00): Please refrain from sabotaging the map and changing the degree of the roads. Before changing the degree of the roads, read the conditions of each tag in the wiki. The roads that you have changed to the highway do not have the conditions of the highway. pay attention
NFZANMNIM (2021-03-07 19:52:07+00:00): سلام
جاده نجف آباد به خرم آباد بزرگراه هستا. طراحی 
 اون مثل بزرگراههای اصفهان-سلفچگان و شهرضا آباده هست. حداکثر سرعت مجاز هم 110 کیلومتره تو این مسیر

عکس تابلو سرعت مجاز در ابتدای این مسیر
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/oFsNroG-B22Aa2Oxo5YJsw
NFZANMNIM (2021-03-08 00:04:08+00:00): در وبسایتی که فرستادم میتونین کل طول مسیر رو مشاهده کنید. دوما اینکه لینک زیر نقشه رسمی کشور هست، که مسیرنجف آباد به خرم آباد رو به عنوان بزرگراه نشون داده.

البته، شما در مورد مسیر علویجه دهق درست گفتیین. تو نقشه شرکت توسعه زیرساختها نشون داده نشده.
https://www.cdtic.ir/Portals/0/Images/HighwayMap.jpg
geoaria (2021-03-08 06:15:37+00:00): سلام 
ممنون بابت پاسخگویی
خیر این مسیر حایز شرایط بزرگراهی نیست.
در صمن اینگونه تغییرات گسترده در نقشه نیاز به تغیر بقیه عناصر وابسته به ان راه نیز دارد من جمله لینک ها و ... اصلاح نوع اتصالات به مسیر های دیگر و یا تغییر درجه مسیر های متصل و ....  متاسفانه خیلی از این موارد در هنگام تغیرات شما رعایت نشده بود.
موردی دیگری که هست این نقشه موجود حاصل تلاش نقشه کش های بسیاری است و ما سعی بر تکمیل آن کنیم و نه تخریب ، تغیر مکرر درجه مسیر یا یک نام شایسته نیست . باید وقت و انرژی را بر روی ایجاد آنچه روی نقشه موجود نیست بگذاریم .برای مثال دیروز دیدم نام یک جاده در مسیر سه راهی دهق تا دهق چندین بار تغییر کرده، آنچه واضح است نام یک جاده معمولا نام مبدا و مقصد را می گیرد یعنی نیازی به درج نام شهر گلپایگان در روی این جاده نبوده است و در کل مهم وجود این جاده برون شهری روی نقشه است و آن کسی که از نقشه استفاده می کند مسیر انتخابی خود را با جستجوی مبدا و مقصد انتخاب می کند و نه نام مسیر
در ضمن بنده شاغل در ادراه کل راه اصفهان هستم و اشنایی کلی با مسیر های سطح استان نیز دارم اگر سوالی بود در خدمتم
AgusQui (2020-07-02 23:59:48+00:00): Que tontería ponerle opening_hours:covid19=same a una estación de policía, que dato más inútil
artem95vlasovets (2020-07-07 09:23:42+00:00): Hi! You added "access=private" and "leisure=swimming_pool" tags to a lot of node. Perhaps it was unintentional. Please fix this. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87422198
AgusQui (2020-07-03 00:03:26+00:00): bus=yes es una restricción de acceso, agregarlo a un highway=bus_stop no tiene sentido
seattlefyi (2020-07-02 01:10:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit, addresses are a great thing to add! A couple of comments:

1. It appears you added house number 2200, but on the odd-numbered side of the street.

2. Please keep in mind that we add addresses to the building outline only if it applies to the entire building, if there are multiple addresses (or we’re not sure) adding a separate node within the building outline (but not attached to it) and set back from the main entrance is fine! If you have questions, feel free to ask. Thanks again and hope to see more edits!
peramides (2020-07-02 01:26:59+00:00): Hi! Sorry that was a typo, the actual number is 2201 (which is the number of a relatively new building called Waterton). I'm trying to figure out an issue with Nominatim, should have been more careful. Thanks.
mueschel (2020-07-04 11:16:28+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6167026770

Thanks!
amnmalik (2020-07-04 12:31:53+00:00): Thanks! Corrected.
robgOSM (2020-07-02 03:46:40+00:00): Schedule 1 Highways
Summary of Restricted Highway Sections (no cycling permitted)
Trans-Canada Highway 1
From the ferry terminal at Horseshoe Bay to the north approach of the Ironworkers Memorial Second Narrows Bridge

Exceptions
Horseshoe Bay to Capilano Road

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/driving-and-cycling/cycling/cycling-regulations-restrictions-rules
tastrax (2020-07-03 00:29:11+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Glassman (2020-07-02 05:51:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87423073
LucFreitas (2020-07-02 01:42:30+00:00): Boa noite, Dudiii. Vi que você adicionou a etiqueta hgv=discouraged em alguns trechos da BR-101, indicando que o tráfego de caminhões de carga de bens é oficialmente não recomendado. Que dados o levaram a realizar essa alteração?
yadathot (2020-07-02 02:05:36+00:00): Added Service Road as per Private Maxar imagery.
5m4u9 (2020-07-02 03:23:36+00:00): hola ale, me olvidé mencionarte una sugerencia...

cuando añadas negocios que sean oficinas o tiendas, es preferible añadirlo como puntos y en todo el edificio...

es preferible punto por encima de área o el edificio porque a veces cambian de lugar y es más problemático modificar. Y a veces hay dos negocios en un mismo edificio

Creo las únicas categorias que podrían ser áreas son las cosas que rara vez cambian, como iglesias, escuelas, universidades, areas militares, mercados o estaciones de buses...

también, a veces cuando editas aparece los límites de los macrodistritos o del municipio (en azul), es posible ocultarlos para que no estorben, así se hace más sencillo la edición... recomiendo una vez que abres el editor para no olvidarse, accedes a la opción presionan la tecla F y en la sección características, desmarcas fronteras/limites/boundaries...
Arnaud Champollion (2022-05-21 10:52:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Lors de la dernière cartopartie à Riez avec le groupe OSM Digne, nous nous sommes interrogés sur la qualification des ruelles étroites.
Pourquoi un grand nombre d'entre elles ont-elles le tag "bicycle=designated" (ce qui les qualifie, en combinaison avec "foot=designated) comme des voies vertes partagées vélo / piéton). Ce tag témoigne normalement je crois d'une signalétique locale (panneau) explicite en ce sens. Pour toutes ces rues j'aurais plutôt vu "highway=pedestrian", qu'en penses-tu ?
Hervé TUC (2022-05-22 16:13:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis d'accord avec vous que les tags 'designated' correspondent à une signalisation spécifique (voies vertes ou voies cyclables) et ne correspondent donc pas à cette situation.
En ce qui concerne le highway=pedestrian je ne l'ai jamais utilisé dans ce cas car sur le wiki il est clairement expliqué que cela correspond à des rues commerçantes, assez larges / passantes. Je pense que ça ne correspond donc pas aux multiples ruelles que l'on peut trouver dans nos villages.
Pour ma part, historiquement j'utilisais highway=footway seulement mais après discussion avec des cyclistes ils se sentaient discriminés ! 😄 Et j'en suis venu à utiliser highway=path + foot=yes + bicycle=yes + surface=paved. 
Mais après un tour sur le wiki je pense que la communauté pencherait plutôt pour highway=footway + bicycle=yes + surface=xxx si vous avez l'info.
Voilà, en espérant avoir été clair.

Cordialement
Frans S (2020-07-04 09:20:10+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping
Please restrict yourself to the mapping of buildings as required in this project
Big landuse taggings should be done outside these projects. they cover more than a single task.
Best regards
Mike Raust (2020-09-18 11:45:14+00:00): Is this a mechnical change? Has "National Power Portal" a compatible license?
user_5359 (2020-07-03 18:33:35+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
Addr:County=Bomi
Admin District=Suehn Mecca
HF ID=LRT6S5
Health District=Suehn Mecca
Ownership=public
Source=Ministry of Health
Status=Funtional
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
DP24PH (2020-07-02 06:59:14+00:00): Change log: Signalised junction fixes, amid pending roadway alignment verification due to localised GCQ restrictions

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
tenzul (2022-05-11 10:56:25+00:00): Hey, these solar panel look very crooked and are not contained by the building they are on. You should use the orthogonalize tool and stay within the roof area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87425803
robgOSM (2020-07-02 03:46:14+00:00): Schedule 1 Highways
Summary of Restricted Highway Sections (no cycling permitted)
Trans-Canada Highway 1
From the ferry terminal at Horseshoe Bay to the north approach of the Ironworkers Memorial Second Narrows Bridge

Exceptions
Horseshoe Bay to Capilano Road

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/driving-and-cycling/cycling/cycling-regulations-restrictions-rules
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-10 04:51:32+00:00): Hi, vietnam321. I adjusted the trunk road (way 241250483) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
user_5359 (2020-07-02 16:21:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
robgOSM (2020-07-02 04:23:28+00:00): Schedule 1 Highways
Summary of Restricted Highway Sections (no cycling permitted)
Trans-Canada Highway 1
From the ferry terminal at Horseshoe Bay to the north approach of the Ironworkers Memorial Second Narrows Bridge

Exceptions
Horseshoe Bay to Capilano Road

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/driving-and-cycling/cycling/cycling-regulations-restrictions-rules
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:09:26+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
seattlefyi (2020-07-02 06:35:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for the update! One comment: it sounds like the business just closed, and deleting the node loses the address. In those cases, you can remove any tags related to the business but leave the address for the next tenant. (Actually I usually try to leave addresses in as much as possible!) If too difficult in OSMAnd, it’s really easy to do using the iD editor (one click to ‘downgrade’). If you have questions, please feel free to ask. Thanks again!
camelCaseNick (2020-07-02 18:11:14+00:00): Hey,
while wikipedia=* is only for exact matches between the article and the OSM element, url=* is pretty generic (and nearly 4 out of 5 usages come from imports, see https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/url/), so if possible, I had used another tag.
Could subject:wikipedia=* work here or is url=* really the only option?
CamelCaseNick
FrankOverman (2020-07-02 21:26:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic  -->
historic = boundary_stone "A historic physical marker that identifies a boundary"

Wiki does not show currently used tag historic=boundary_marker

So this also is incorrect?
byckel (2020-07-15 09:03:41+00:00): @CamelCaseNick:
1. I personally wouldn't tag this info at all
2. When 80% of url's result from imports, this is only a problem if the imports themselves are problematic.
But if you like subject:wikipedia more, go ahead.