piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-09-21 06:03:20+00:00): Are those bollards or fire hydrant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126351993
yoasif (2022-09-21 17:24:55+00:00): I see both... which nodes are you talking about specifically?
MxxCon (2022-09-22 01:39:31+00:00): Ah, i see you already mapped the hydrant inside in the middle. osmcha didn't show that.
Although, should those 2 pillars be mapped separately or are they integral part of the hydrant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126351993
redd (2022-09-19 08:10:46+00:00): Danke für Lösen meines Hinweises!
sunho817 (2022-09-19 12:19:37+00:00): 안녕하세요, 혹시 지도 삭제하신 이유가 있으신가요? 일부 길이 갑자기 삭제되어서 의견 드립니다.
user_2066394 (2022-09-20 09:47:32+00:00): highway=path
user_5359 (2022-09-24 06:39:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1095805487 (one of over five hundred). What is the meaning of all the foreign tags
A0 = 33536708
A1 = 2002189188981868514800000000
A10 = 일반건축물
A11 = 2
A12 = 일반건축물대방
A13 = 중외공원관광지화장실
A15 = 67.92
A16 = 21
A17 = 철근콘크리트구조
A18 = 03000
A19 = 제1종근린생활시설
A2 = 2917010900101790016
A20 = 5.1
A21 = 1
A22 = 0
A23 = 2001-11-26
A24 = 2002-07-08
A25 = 21
A26 = 03
A27 = 20대
A28 = 025
A29 = 25세미만
A3 = 2917010900
A30 = 2022-01-17
A4 = 광주광역시 북구 운암동
A5 = 1
A6 = 일반
A7 = 179-16
A8 = 25131
A9 = 1
?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-12 07:42:57+00:00): Didn't really see bicycle parking here. There is a cart parking space. I suggest re-tagging it as a bicycle_parking =informal
fghj753 (2023-07-12 08:06:44+00:00): Pretty sure there was bicycle parking at one entrance, but not at another. Bit further away from entrance than cart storage. 
Looking at mapillary it seems like I've misplaced the node as it should be closer to NE corner on handicapped parking. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.419488608892&lng=24.762347247475&z=17&pKey=295881068672651&focus=photo&x=0.17658996465528115&y=0.5474598750641052&zoom=2.1171493936689756&menu=false
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-12 18:57:08+00:00): I've recently went there on a bike and didn't see it and had to park where the carts are left. But there were many people with large purchases, so maybe I just didn't see it. There was another bike and it too was parked on the pipes which create cart parking spaces. I'd check just in case if they removed it because it's a bit cramped at the entrance.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-22 18:31:43+00:00): I've checked again. Bicycle parking is missing. There are holes left from the bolts in the ground where it was. Probably was in the way of people moving their stuff to cars.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-20 02:04:44+00:00): Cześć, czy w tym miejscu są 2 różne AED?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10035626818

oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10035626817
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 05:07:52+00:00): 10세 미만, A0 같은 태그들은 혹시 국토교통부 브이월드나 정부 사이트에서 가져온 정보들인가요?
이런 저작권이 있는 정보들은 오픈스트리트맵에 가져오시면 곤란합니다.
국토해양부 장관의 허가 없이 기본측량성과 중 지도 등 또는 측량용 사진을 국외로 반출하여서는 아니 된다." (공간정보의 구축 및 관리 등에 관한 법률 16조1항)
국립지리원 측량 성과나 다른 한국의 지도를 베끼거나 하면 문제가 됩니다. (최고 벌금 2천만원 또는 징역 2년) 당연히 정부에서 운영하는 vworld에서 정보를 복제해도 불법입니다.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 05:08:37+00:00):  공간정보의 구축 및 관리 등에 관한 법률 제14조, 제15조, 제16조, 제19조, 제20조, 제21조에 의거 국토교통부장관의 사전승인 없이는 복제, 국외 반출 및 본지도를 이용한 다른 지도의 간행을 금하고 있습니다.
2. 위사항의 위반자는 공간정보의 구축 및 관리 등에 관한 법률 제108조, 제109조에 의거 제16조 및 제21조 위반시 2년 이하의 징역 또는 2천만원 이하의 벌금, 제14조, 제15조 및 제19조 위반시 1년 이하의 징역 또는 1천만원 이하의 벌금에 각 처합니다.

지도는 복제하거나 국외반출을 철저히 금하고 있으니 유념하시기 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 05:10:37+00:00): 네이버 지도, 카카오맵, 브이월드, 지적지도, 구글 지도에서 가져오면 안됩니다.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-19 10:18:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Wellicht office=it of consulting? Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-19 10:32:38+00:00): Cześć, wiesz może dokładniej gdzie jest AED? W polu lokalizacji najlepiej wpisać gdzie konkretnie on jest - jak go znaleźć będąc w obiekcie, np. ściana na prawo od wejścia itp. Albo opisać, że ktoś musi ten AED wydać.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Hadi Omid (2022-09-19 11:55:03+00:00): تغییرات شما خلاف واقعیات است، لطفا نقشه رو بر اساس سلیقه شخصی ویرایش نکنید
kartonage (2022-09-19 08:29:09+00:00): In CS 126354708 und diesem hier hast du zweimal hintereinander ziemlich blind nicht drauf geachtet, dass es sich hier um eine Dublette handelt.
Schaust du auch was du tust oder ist das einfach ein automatischer Edit? 

Mir ist schon öfter aufgefallen, dass du Telefonnummern anpasst ohne auf die Validität der Rest der Daten zu achten.

So eine Vorgehensweise ist ausdrücklich unerwünscht. Für weiteres kannst du gerne https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct konsultieren.
Ich würde dich bitten diese Vorgehensweise nicht fortzuführen und dich mit Qualität um die Objekte zu kümmern ... oder es sein zu lassen. Danke.
googlenaut (2022-09-30 12:22:21+00:00): Dublettenprüfung + Validitätscheck war nicht Teil dieser Aufgabe. Zumindest hat sich die Datenqualität durch das Hinzufügen einer Landesvorwahl nicht wesentlich verschlechtert.
A67-A67 (2022-09-19 10:56:01+00:00): You've drawn road over existing paths. I've removed those. Besides, highway=service is a correct road classification for a road on a holiday park / campsite, like these.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-09-19 11:07:56+00:00): Hi! 
Thank you a lot. The paths were disabled by me in the previous time and I forget about it. Thank you!
abakus_uploader (2022-09-19 22:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hadi Omid (2022-09-19 11:54:33+00:00): تغییرات شما خلاف واقعیات است، لطفا نقشه رو بر اساس سلیقه شخصی ویرایش نکنید
aceman444 (2023-06-26 12:03:29+00:00): Zase cernota od mapy.cz bez udania zdroja.
Inak podla webstranky 
https://www.humnokemp.sk/h/huntry-camp/ je camp dost inde, takze co je spravne?
ivanbranco (2022-09-19 17:59:41+00:00): Hi Jonathan,

place=Caseta Cosamaloapan is not a valid place value. Valid values are things like city, village, hamlet ecc.

Could you take a look at it?

Good mapping :)
Warin61 (2023-04-17 06:52:21+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase for a street public library... if that is what node 10035839623 is.
ortho_is_hot (2023-04-19 12:21:35+00:00): Thanks, you are correct, will update the node
marczoutendijk (2023-02-06 15:12:28+00:00): Hoi MrCruiser,
Je hebt in deze buurt een aantal keren de tags surface=bestraat gebruikt. Op zich komt die combinatie wereldwijd maar 45x voor, en ik vroeg me af of een van de andere waarden uit deze lijst:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
(bv. paving_stones), niet een beter alternatief daar voor is?
Groet,
Marc
MrCruiser (2023-02-07 19:23:57+00:00): Dag Marc, inderdaad een beetje dom. Ik gebruikte de app Go Map!! en heb een standaard voorgeprogrammeerde tag gebruikt in de veronderstelling dat de Nederlandse tekst vertaald werd… 🤐
marczoutendijk (2023-02-07 20:04:05+00:00): Dank voor je reactie!
Zorg je zelf voor de aanpassingen?
habi (2022-09-19 07:31:18+00:00): Only closes Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3363055 :)
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-20 09:49:52+00:00): سلام ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
برچسب منطقه در ایران بیشتر به صورت شماره است مانند منطقه 19 تهران. برای نشان دادن محلات از place=neighbourhood استفاده میکنیم.
ضمنا سایر برچسب های مربوط به حاج قاسم هم افزوده شد.
Nastaran_Sabouri (2024-08-10 12:32:39+00:00): It was wrong
Thank you for correcting
ChehrehBargi (2024-08-10 16:23:04+00:00): I hope you don't mind the notes. In fact, this work is to record the history here so that if another user wants to change something here, she can refer to the history and understand the reason for each change.
user_5359 (2022-09-20 08:50:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on (http://www.osmp.org/node/10011817569 one of sixteen). What is the meaning of the tag phn. = 9861688124 Did you mean the phone number? Please us the key phone and the international number format (with country number)
mcliquid (2022-09-19 08:33:51+00:00): Hi Olga, the Müselbacher Straße is still closed due to a landslide. 
You can also see the landslide very well on the aerial photo. That is why I have reversed your changes.
On the current occasion, I have also just phoned the municipality and had this confirmed. There is still no possibility for vehicles to drive here and there are still no plans to repair the road.

Revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126360094

Thank you for your understanding!
mcliquid (2022-09-19 08:35:32+00:00): Unfortunately I can't find your efforts in Austria nor your username on the wiki page. Could you please keep this up to date?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapbox#Mapbox_Data_Team
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-09-19 14:01:24+00:00): Thank you for paying attention to this edit. 
With respect, 
Olga.
boldtrn (2023-01-15 16:38:36+00:00): Wouldn't it be better to close the disconnection, but add it as construction? I almost closed this, as it looks like tagging issue.
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2023-01-16 05:56:33+00:00): Thanks!
With respect,
Olga.
rainerU (2022-09-28 06:55:32+00:00): Hallo Samse26,

der Container wurde ja inzwischen von NUP gelöscht. Das wäre in diesem Fall auch mein Vorschlag gewesen. Bei Objekten, die auf den Luftbildern noch deutlich zu sehen sind, aber nicht mehr existieren, ist es  meist besser, das Objekt bestehen zu lassen, es aber mit einem Lifecycle-Präfix zu versehen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix Damit verhindert man, dass andere Mapper das Objekt anhand der Luftbilder wieder hinzufügen.

Grüße
Rainer
RicoElectrico (2022-09-19 14:10:21+00:00): Cześć,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10035904917

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10035903817

Jaki obiekt tam się znajduje? Dodałbym od razu na mapę. Wygląda to na jakąś fabrykę.
4004 (2022-09-19 21:29:30+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
пару вопросов:
- зачем вы удалили русское название улицы?
- зачем две разные точки для полигон арены? там парк или стадион?
Tutby (2022-09-20 07:10:02+00:00): Добрый день,
- название улицы как основное прописал по-беларуски, т.к. в Беларуси, согласно закона «Аб найменьнях геаграфічных аб’ектаў», артыкул 17 - наименования географическим объектам даются исключительно на беларуском языке, а далее через транслитерацию передаются на другие языки.
- для полигон-арены корректна одна точка обозначающая стадион.
4004 (2022-09-20 09:42:57+00:00): добрый.
- названия в ОСМ по текущему соглашению пишутся по русски, с доп тегами для русского и беларуского вариантов. удалять какие либо из них не стоит.
- принято
jcr83 (2022-09-19 16:05:37+00:00): Hello,
On the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222580674 , you added highway=track, but you left destroyed:highway=track . So what is the current status of the track?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mueschel (2022-10-14 09:59:07+00:00): Hallo,
 'nn' ist keine Sprache, schau bitte mal nach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10035794568
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-19 10:40:09+00:00): Dag dennis...
Je hebt hier een voetgangersgebied gemaakt.
motor_vehicle=no is dan niet nodig.
Realiseer je dat ook de fietsroutes nu geblokkeerd zijn.
Knooppuntroute 79 -97
Is deze er niet meer of mag je hier wellicht toch fietsen?
Staat hier een bord voetgangersgebied met restricties.
Zijn er uitzonderingen voor bezorgers.. bepaalde tijden.?
Wat is je bron in deze? 
De kaart is nu onbruikbaar als fietskaart.

Bij geen reactie volgt een revert. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-19 10:57:18+00:00): Ik heb in ieder geval bicycle=yes toegevoegd.
Ga even na welke conditional tags hier horen zodat het voor bepaalde groepen wel routeert. 

Svp niet zomaar fietsroutes op slot zetten door van een weg een voetgangersgebied te maken.

MVG
eggie
Taurus3 (2022-09-19 12:05:41+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Sorry niet zoveel ervaring. Er mag nog steeds gefietst worden. Staat een C1 bord, laden en lossen toegestaan tussen 7.00-12.00. Geen uitzonderingen voor bezorgers. Bron: Woon er zelf en kom er elke dag.
Taurus3 (2022-09-19 12:06:10+00:00): Daarnaast, geen idee wat je bedoeld met fietsroutes op slot zetten, heb die niet aangepast.
Taurus3 (2022-09-19 12:07:43+00:00): Burgemeester Jansenplein is een fiets/voetgangerszone zoals de rest van het centrum, dit is niet toegankelijk voor gemotoriseerd verkeer.
eggie (2022-09-19 12:33:38+00:00): Dennis.. Allereerst bedankt voor je reactie..
Zal vanmiddag  even kijken.
Wanneer je op de fietskaart layer kijkt zie je de fietsroute lopen.
Die laad en los tijd dat is de delivery. Die kan worden toegevoegd. Ik kijk later wel.. dat komt wel goed. Het staat nu weer open voor fietsers in ieder geval.
C1 is het witte ronde botd met de rode rand. Dat maakt het nog geen pedestrian.
Het zal wellicht zoals vaker niet consistent zijn getagd. Blijft allemaal lastig.
Je moet maar eens kijken ter leering ende vermaeck naar de tagging op de aansluitende wegen.
Daar staat die conditional tagging op voor laden en lossen.
Op het moment je van een residential een pedestrian maakt routeert het niet meer voor fietsers. Er loopt daar los van ook nog een fietsroute.  Daarom heb ik er bicycle=yes aan toegevoegd als uitzondering.

Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-09-19 15:38:36+00:00): Aangepast met motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (07:00-12:00)
eggie (2022-09-19 15:40:54+00:00): Hier zie je de fietsroute lopen
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?relations=11231,7706753&map=18.0/52.2657/6.7934
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-09-20 23:06:18+00:00): Roads have been already mapped here so please be careful.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Hufkratzer (2022-09-19 13:28:06+00:00): Hi, ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095855758 nicht einfach ein Reitplatz (pitch)? Es sieht im Luftbild so aus.
aush01 (2022-09-20 13:12:31+00:00): Du hast Recht, hab es korrigiert.
habi (2022-09-19 10:15:21+00:00): Ciao Max
Ich würde einen Döner-Laden nicht als 'Restaurant' taggen, sondern als 'Fast Food'.
Da https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105833916/ auch ein Tramwartehüsli ist, sollte der Döner als einzelner Punkt eingetragen werden.
All dies habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126364501 gemacht.
Gruss,
habi
mcliquid (2022-09-19 08:58:47+00:00): Hi, was ist das hier für ein kurzer Weg?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9308515909

Und seit wann gibt es hier einen Fußgängerüberweg?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9308515910
Hadi Omid (2022-09-19 11:54:02+00:00): تغییرات شما خلاف واقعیات است، لطفا نقشه رو بر اساس سلیقه شخصی ویرایش نکنید
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2022-09-19 08:56:57+00:00): CORRECTION AROUND CANDELARIA
Dodko (2022-09-19 14:52:56+00:00): Do not add descriptive names
name=Református templom

tag
denomination=reformed
requires
religion=christian
Patr1k_P (2022-09-22 10:28:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/850856019

In Slovakia we give Slovak names, if you want to add HU you need to use name:hu
Dodko (2022-09-19 14:57:05+00:00): Not use in name "mellszobor"
use tag
artwork_type=bust
canfe (2022-09-20 10:39:35+00:00): Ti pregherei di rispondere aglio OTTO messaggi precedenti ed inoltre di rendere ortogonali le sagome degli edifici. Su ID si può usare il tasto Q
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126361333
eggie (2022-09-19 10:28:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
RicoElectrico (2022-09-19 10:36:26+00:00): Cześć, wydaje mi się, że nie o tę pozycję Ci chodziło. Gdzie jest ten AED? Bo obecnie zaznaczony jest na placu przy kościele, a nie w budynku, jak sugeruje Twój opis.
Marcin Puszko (2022-09-20 11:44:15+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi - rzeczywiście lokalizacja jakoś się źle wskazała
Frans S (2022-09-19 09:22:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
 Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.

Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126361588
dpolovinkin (2025-01-24 07:34:56+00:00): Hi! I dont know why but it seems you added a lot of duplicating landuses here, like res areas over already existing res areas, and stuff like that. example - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095862546. Will clean it up :)
dpolovinkin (2025-01-24 07:41:03+00:00): and btw regular zones with trees are natural wood, not orchards, which is used for food production :) talking about this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095862515

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=orchard?uselang=en-GB
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:34:35+00:00): See my comments on changeset 12362011 which are also valid here.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126361892
Taya_S (2022-09-26 14:40:49+00:00): This change messed up a lot of the terrain by adding a transparent forest layer over everything