piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
R0bst3r (2020-12-09 12:51:04+00:00): Hallo Schröcker,
ich habe mir deine Änderung angesehen. Es wurde nur ein Punkt hinzugefügt. Wie kann man helfen?
Dein Änderungskommentar "Fix" ist leider wenig aussagekräftig.
Viele Grüße R0bst3r
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95449600
Schröcker (2020-12-10 23:08:14+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
"KeepRight" meldete einen Fehler: "die Linie 648288916 Dieser highway schneidet den highway #648288928 aber es gibt keinen gemeinsamen Verbindungspunkt". Im Zuge der Fehlerbearbeitung habe ich den Punkt östlich wohl versehentlich gesetzt. Der eigentliche Fehler wurde wohl schon mit Änderungssatz Version #2 vor 2 Monaten gefixt! KeepRight meldet bei mir Stand dieser Linie: 2018-11-24 !!! Also veraltete Datenbasis.
Gruß!
Schröcker
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-07 23:17:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 90923198, 90923942, 90924397.
dieterdreist (2020-12-21 22:46:07+00:00): vandalism
luisforte (2020-12-08 00:36:45+00:00): A barbearia/cabeleireiro não aparecia porque continha apenas o nome, faltava indicar que tipo de entidade era, neste caso faltava shop=hairdresser. Já está corrigido.
Podem ser ainda acrescentadas outras caracteristicas, como male=yes se for somente uma barbearia para homens. Se for unisexo não será necessário acrescentar quaquer informação.
Luis
dieterdreist (2020-12-21 22:45:35+00:00): vandalism
Frans S (2020-12-08 13:58:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please square the buildings you map
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95450427
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-08 17:47:42+00:00): Bonjour, qu'est ce que c'est ESI Impots ? Vous semblez avoir ajouté le nom sur des batiments mais sans qualifier réellement l'activité, pourriez vous préciser svp ?
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95450547
h5xw02byn31e (2020-12-08 17:51:52+00:00): Bonjour, ce sont des "Etablissements de Services Informatiques", de ce que j'ai compris c'est en partie des équipes techniques mais également un centre de données, alors je ne sais pas quel tag est le plus approprié. Bonne fin de journée
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-09 06:04:00+00:00): Bonjour et merci de votre retour. Mais d'où proviennent ces données ? 
Si il y a des équipes alors peut-être comme sur certains il y a le tag office, mais je n'ai pas bien compris que sont ces ESI. Et si il y a des données, alors sans doute du coté des datacenter ?
Question principale sans doute c'est 'd'ou proviennent ces données car je doute que vous ayez pu aller sur le terrain vu la taille du terrain" :)
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95450547
h5xw02byn31e (2020-12-09 07:26:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Les informations proviennent de plusieurs sources:
- https://www.pappers.fr/entreprise/disi-direction-des-services-informatiques-des-pays-du-centre-130015183
- https://data.economie.gouv.fr/explore/dataset/inventaire-immobilier-de-letat/information/ (Fonction: centre informatique)
- https://www.fo-dgfip-sd.fr/02A/IMG/pdf/MISE_EN_PLACE_DES_DIRECTIONS_DES_SERVICES_INFORMATIQUES_1_.pdf
- https://www.ccomptes.fr/system/files/2019-05/20190528-rapport-investissements-informatiques-DGFiP-DGDDI_0.pdf
- http://www.dgfip.cgt.fr/691/spip.php?rubrique7

Bonne journée
Vinber (2020-12-09 09:14:46+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour ces divers liens. Je ne sais pas comment vous procédez, si cela correspond à des lieux que vous connaissez personnellement, d'expériences, de "terrains ?
Si oui parfait !
Si non, je pense qu'il est important de lire ces quelques lignes : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Import/Guidelines

à bientôt
PS : ce n'est pas pour vous décourager de quoi que ce soit, bien au contraire, c'est pour contribuer de la manière la plus "communautaire" et donc acceptée possible !
!bm (2020-12-08 11:26:46+00:00): Hallo Laubisba,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! 

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Die Flächen zu verbinden scheint mir hier nicht ratsam, da sie räumlich getrennt sind und dann mitunter der Name (n)irgendwo angezeigt wird. Davon abgesehen habe ich es entsprechend geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95482620

--besteGrüße!bm
Frans S (2020-12-08 13:56:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate enough. Also the buildings are not squared.
How to deal with mapping quite a number of identical buildings
First map 1 building very precise and squared. Then, with the building still selected, copy it and past it on the new location.
When you have repeated that and a row of buildings, you can also select a number of buildings and past them as a group.


This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95450668
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-02 23:09:17+00:00): isso não é uma ponte!
Allan-sumare (2022-09-02 23:53:41+00:00): E o que é agora?
dieterdreist (2020-12-21 22:43:07+00:00): vandalism
ALn_668 (2022-04-15 21:17:20+00:00): vandalism fixed also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119765974
ALn_668 (2022-04-15 21:18:23+00:00): same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119766004
felipeeugenio (2020-12-08 12:55:19+00:00): Hola Rubén. el uso que le estás dando a plot es incorrecto.
Pero incluso así, usamos addr para las numeraciones. Lo voy a corregir.
saludos
aharvey (2020-12-08 13:11:51+00:00): Is this oneway for bicycles? Looking at the tags before hand at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/298288936 it said forward bicycles were allowed but not backward, by adding the bicycle=yes tag it's now ambigious if bicycles are allowed in both directions. If only one direction is allowed then should the bicycle tag should be omitted for the bicycle:forward and bicycle:backward tags? If allowed in both directions then we don't need :forward and :backward tags.
mapsamillion78 (2020-12-24 04:04:13+00:00): thanks aharvey, upon further review of this footway as a shared path, there is no enforced single-direction for bicycles, so the bicycle:forward and bicylce:backward tags have been removed, replaced with a more standard bicycle:designated tag to match the footway segments that adjoing this segment to the south.
aharvey (2020-12-24 04:09:34+00:00): Great thanks for checking it and fixing.
alejandroscf (2020-12-08 01:27:38+00:00): Added power line
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-14 07:58:27+00:00): Czy pozostały jakiekolwiek, najmniejsze nawet ślady torów w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882176387 czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882176388 ?

(zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2578385 ? )
Warin61 (2020-12-22 02:33:04+00:00): Hi,

There is an error on one building. 

Firstly Relation: 11991963 "type"="multipolygon"  "building"="house" 
has only one member and that relation can be deleted. 

Second Relation: 11991964     "type"="multipolygon" "roof:colour"="#F2EEE7" "building"="house"

referred to the above relation .. but with no role. Instead the outer way for this building should be referred to with the role 'outer'.
voteforpedro (2020-12-10 22:51:36+00:00): Apologies for including another edit in Calgary.
DressyPear4 (2020-12-13 04:20:55+00:00): O que há de errado com o conjunto São José para ficar deletando as edificações?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95454206
Supaplex (2020-12-08 09:57:32+00:00): 你可以用JOSM來編輯公車路線，也許比較直觀點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95455312
SXCKH (2020-12-12 14:46:10+00:00): 感謝您的建議，本人會試試看如何利用JOSM來編輯
kapazao (2022-06-27 09:56:23+00:00): Hola, ¿eso de landuse=residential + residential=single_family dónde lo viste?, ¿no es una parcela (place=plot)?
CarlosMG (2022-06-27 12:50:19+00:00): Hola, no hay información al respecto en la Wiki, pero es un valor que sugiere el editor iD en una zona residencial, e intuyo que especifica que es un terreno residencial unifamiliar. Al ser el terreno de casas adosadas unifamiliares no sé si es el valor correcto a usar en este caso o 'place=plot'. Por ejemplo en urbanizaciones o complejos de apartamentos si se usa 'residential=apartaments'.
kapazao (2022-06-30 11:49:28+00:00): He corregido esos valores a place=plot, que es más correcto. El editor iD a veces aconseja cosas que no son lo mejor ni están consensuadas por la comunidad. Siempre hay que tirar de la wiki y contrastar.
Por cierto estoy corrigiendo Úbeda en general por si te interesa. Deberías ver los errores que hay en Osmose, que mayormente he visto que son tuyos y había unos cientos. La mayoría que he podido los he corregido.
Un saludo
maraf24 (2020-12-08 16:12:11+00:00): Jakie jest źródło? 
Dlaczego skasowałeś te nazwy?
maraf24 (2020-12-08 16:17:25+00:00): Ten szczyt isnieje w tym miejscu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5242393290
Natomiast nazwa jest nazwą zbocza. Jest różnica między usunieciem całego obiektu w osm, a usunięciem nazwy.
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:53:43+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.72836/23.05095
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:54:03+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.72149/23.04948
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:54:30+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.71446/23.05154
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:55:16+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.69046/23.04213
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:55:54+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.68360/23.04873
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:57:05+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.63924/23.05205
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:57:42+00:00): Fix that before doing more changes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7686057117#map=17/48.63287/23.05035
woodpeck (2020-12-08 21:17:26+00:00): opencarpatia, please stop spamming every one of this user's changesets with 2-month old grievances.
opencarpatia (2020-12-09 00:55:01+00:00): Hello woodpeck. But what is the plan on fixing these malicious changesets that actually remains online and on user devices for 2 month? I truly don't understand the approach. I've pointed to only few different changes as examples, but only few areas were fixed (thanks to maraf24). And these reverts were actually done as a response to comments.

Now provided direct links only to the most annoying and misaligned segments.

I don't feel confident to start reverting these changesets on my own.. Is someone already doing systematic check of each change done during last two month to find and fix all the gaps?

Right now its impossible to normally use this highway as an alignment reference and its not reasonable to attach new roads or any other objects to it.
valhikes (2023-03-06 00:51:31+00:00): Why? Particularly along the part of the trail that includes bridges too narrow for anything but an (illegal) motorcycle and with trees across the railing and devolves into a bear tunnel near the creek?
maraf24 (2020-12-08 16:19:38+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542269241
maraf24 (2020-12-08 17:03:28+00:00): Tu też jest szczyt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5242393293/history
opencarpatia (2020-12-08 19:27:50+00:00): Are you going to fix the geometry of the trunk you've broken in Ukraine before making new changes??

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7686057117/history#map=17/48.63245/23.05066&layers=G
SantsPavan (2025-06-13 00:21:14+00:00): Resolved Problem
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-08 20:10:44+00:00): Hi Mick-Mappy and welcome to OSM!
This seems like quite a large park and seems to include a lot of infrastructure such as rail lines, industrial facilities and the like.

Are you sure leisure=park is the best way to describe it?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
smanidee (2020-12-08 06:23:07+00:00): Hi,
Please find the appropriate comment for the changeset:95463157, Modified driveway.
Regards,
smanidee
TomPar (2020-12-08 20:28:03+00:00): Hello.  Per https://www.farringtonnaturelinc.org/contact, this parcel is not open to the public and thus should not get the leisure=nature_reserve tag.  Per OSM wiki: "nature reserve is a protected area where the public is invited to visit".  I believe the previous tag of summer_camp is the best fit.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95463319
user_3716049 (2023-03-07 17:34:38+00:00): Hi tux, da das Gaming beim Holocafe die eigentliche Attraktion darstellt, wäre folgendes wohl passender :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Damusement_arcade

MfG Kelso
tux67 (2023-03-08 07:30:21+00:00): Bestimmt, ist aktualisiert. Danke.
Túllio (2021-02-02 13:18:28+00:00): Olá e obrigado pelas edições. Um lembrete é para não usar o texto todo em caixa alta e que é desnecessário colocar o nome de "Estrada Vicinal", o local do nome é para inserir um nome próprio da via!
Damaraland (2021-02-03 00:53:02+00:00): Hello Túllio. This road had its name with all capital letters added by Marcospaulista on 09/09/2020 in www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90649262, with the same changeset comment as the road, "ESTRADA VICINAL" . Thanks for the note though and the update to the road.

Olá Túllio. Esta estrada teve seu nome com todas as letras maiúsculas adicionadas por Marcospaulista em 09/09/2020 em www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90649262 com o mesmo comentário do changeset da estrada, "ESTRADA VICINAL". Obrigado pela nota e pela atualização para a estrada.
Túllio (2021-02-03 01:41:38+00:00): Obrigado pelas informações!
Dimacn (2020-12-08 06:55:29+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте названия жилым домам в тег name. Для адресации используйте поля addr:street и addr:housenumber  Ваша правка отменена.
NM$L (2020-12-26 07:44:37+00:00): Why you named all the boundary "India"?
Heinz_V (2020-12-27 07:20:19+00:00): Sorry, that was an error. I made corrections.
pesec (2020-12-08 08:38:41+00:00): Tag:building=residential
Общий тег для зданий, используемых в основном в качестве жилья. Если известны дополнительные подробности о здании, используйте один из более конкретных тегов:
building=detached — отдельно стоящий частный жилой дом, не имеющий общих стен с другими аналогичными зданиями. Обычно на одну семью
pesec (2020-12-08 08:40:09+00:00): addr:city	Наименование населенного пункта.
Используется для объектов, находящихся за пределами полигона населённого пункта. Обычно не требуется, так как принадлежность к населённому пункту можно определить из геометрии его границы, если она внесена в OSM
pesec (2020-12-08 08:46:58+00:00): "Мастерская Созвездие = Цокольный этаж"
недопустимый тэг для объектов.
Хотите указать наименование организации - ставьте точку с назначением и тэг name=
pesec (2020-12-08 08:50:33+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы форма объекта соответствовала истинным размерам и геометрии.
По возможности указывайте входы в здание.
Syl (2020-12-08 06:55:50+00:00): Erreur de commentaire, voir note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/899195
deven_smith_ (2020-12-09 17:55:37+00:00): Thanks
Supaplex (2021-04-17 05:58:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2020-12-08 18:35:01+00:00): вы некорректно мапите лесные кварталы. Ознакомьтесь в вики и исправьте, в противном случае придется откатить эту правку
literan (2020-12-10 08:56:43+00:00): я исправил самостоятельно, потратив на это полчаса времени. Т.к. вы не реагируете на замечания ,в следующий раз просто откачу. При упорствовании в некорректных правок придется обращаться в Data working group
MosKartograf (2020-12-19 15:19:52+00:00): Где была неверная разметка?
MosKartograf (2020-12-19 15:34:13+00:00): Понял образец, спасибо.
mueschel (2020-12-09 14:46:06+00:00): Hallo,
dieser Node hat noch ein paar fremde Tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8204633309

Gruß
Jan
okilimu (2020-12-09 20:27:08+00:00): Hallo Jan,

danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die temporären Tags gerade entfernt. Eigentlich prüfe ich immer, das ich alle entfernt haben, der Knoten ist mir durch die Lappen gegangen
syntex (2020-12-15 17:21:15+00:00): Why have you changed the tag of the M-17 road from primary to path?
tomrallen (2020-12-16 06:00:01+00:00): Must have been a mistake, sorry
syntex (2020-12-16 06:54:01+00:00): Ok, no problem
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-09 06:42:58+00:00): Duplicate/overlapping data of buildings was created, I've removed/fixed that.
osm_saint-louis (2020-12-09 07:13:28+00:00): Thank you, Tomas. When I opened the area in JOSM, there were no data ... I mapped a few things ... then I restarted JOSM, because I could'nt imagine, that nobody would have mapped there ... and now there were data. I did'nt see the duplicate mappings. Thank you for doing that. I have a question: Why do you map the roads in Lithuania in the villages as tertiary ones and outside as 'unclassified'?
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-09 07:44:13+00:00): Road classification is mapped to official one, as that gives more information on how the roads are maintained. Unclassified are roads which DO NOT have an official classification - which are not part of nation-wide road network. So unclassified does not relate to "in the village" or "outside of the village".
IpswichMapper (2020-12-21 14:08:52+00:00): This time you removed all the tags, not just the name. Good work.

On the co-op website it still says this shop exists, however it is clearly closed looking at mapillary images.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95471210
Jakka (2020-12-08 09:04:25+00:00): thx voor de verbetering
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-10 20:05:45+00:00): Hi Cao Van Thuy, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping? Thanks.

More details about your map edits: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=95471465#15/16.2399/108.0474

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
canfe (2020-12-09 19:31:26+00:00): Il posteggio risulta staccato dalla strada.
Se è contiguo come penso, penso sarebbe meglio taggarlo come:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
nevw (2020-12-13 07:05:11+00:00): Hi
The 'duplicate segment' here 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.80653&lat=-34.98506&zoom=14
 appears to be a remnant bit of the NP boundary on CAPAD that you don't require.

The touching rings are of no concern I expect and just a technical advisory as the boundaries do touch in the datasets.
Frans S (2020-12-08 13:28:35+00:00): Hello Isabella, Thanks for mapping here.
Please use the correct imagery. You are working from BING which is rather old..
Select the Project imagery or Maxar
Look here how to change and correct offset of Imageries
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Best regards
SomeoneElse (2020-12-12 12:02:29+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure that the roundabout here should really be a primary road? It was changed quite recently by a new mapper, who also added the road that you "fixed" and a number of the other changes that they have made seem to be problematic as well. In cases like this, your "fix" will make it harder to undo the changes that need to be undone.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-20 22:24:01+00:00): No reply from the other mapper, so I've changed some of the rogue primary and unclassified roads here to service.  There is still a bit of inconsistency over the use of "private", FWIW - I'm guessing that everything the refinery side of "vehicle inspection" should be private, but I've no local knowledge here.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-08 09:34:45+00:00): Hallo CptJack90,

haben die beiden Gebäude wirklich dieselbe Hausnummer?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
CptJack90 (2020-12-08 10:23:01+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf, 
danke für den Hinweis. Das südliche Gebäude hat natürlich eine andere Hausnummer. Diese ist mir aber nicht bekannt. Copy-Paste-Fehler
damianeue (2021-01-04 14:02:31+00:00): Quando segnali le corsie del casello di uscita basta fare una way unica valida per tutte le corsie. Già ho sistemato io. Inoltre ti consiglio di contattarmi su Telegram a @Vmoscia per essere aggiunto al gruppo ufficiale di OSMItalia, se non ne fai già parte.
SekeRob (2021-01-04 16:29:19+00:00): Tastes vary on how it 'should' be done. 2 random examples from around Rome
1) All lanes on entrance mapped separately, exit for telepass and ticket mapped separately.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/41.93027/12.75695
2) All lanes mapped as 1, but total lanes indicated: 14
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/41.92603/12.70690
So I beg to differ with you on the matter and expected to at least see lanes=7 and not lanes=1 at the A14 exit Pescara Ovest.
Those with telepass and self navigating car wont know which gate to take either.
Have fun
Mannivu (2021-01-04 17:32:00+00:00): If there's no physical separation, mapping 7 lines with one way each is wrong (it's like mapping a two-way highway with two ways, one for each direction). Mapping for telepass users (which have to watch the signs to know wich gantry to take, not a router) and for autonomous cars is mapping for the renderer, wich is a wrong way of mapping.
SekeRob (2021-01-04 17:45:41+00:00): Great, I just put the random examples out to show that this is NOT universally accepted and practice and I go by the examples, not some assertive arguing, but I'll adept. Leaves the lanes count number. If a motorway is 2 lanes 1 direction or 3 or 4, it's tagged with 2-3-4. The exit should be tagged with 7 not 1 as per the second example, and there are multiple random motorway exits toll barriers that show this. Another example at Firenze, 5 gates, tagged 5 lanes on, 9 gates off, 9 lanes tagged. Still see only 1 on Pescara Ovest.
cheers.
Mannivu (2021-01-04 17:58:57+00:00): So, if you take something wrong as example, everything should be tagged in the wrong way? That's not how a cooperative project works. There are guidelines stating that if there's no physical separation there should only be one way tagged (so yeah, even Firenze's tagging is wrong).
SekeRob (2021-01-04 18:46:06+00:00): Not something, multiple! Think you've got your work cut out as many are more than a few years old. Guidelines are guideline, not musts!, and boy is there physical separation come reaching the toll gates.
4 hours into this discussion, still see only lanes=1 tag but these days OSM is very slow to update as the rendered view shows me the 7 lanes I drew a 4 weeks ago.
Now I'm done with this going nowhere. Make it proper and fix those other motorway exits and entrances.  'how it SHOULD be'
Ciao Ciao