piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2020-11-01 17:50:11+00:00): Hi,
all these areas overlap with existing natural=wood areas.
Please don't add new areas on top, but change the tagging of the existing objects.

And, all the tags are misspelled, it is 'landcover' and 'source'.

Please check and fix this.
mueschel (2020-11-01 17:52:02+00:00): And, additionally, your aerial images are outdated. Many of the areas don't exist any more on more recent images.
gpstracks (2020-11-01 07:05:06+00:00): Buongiorno.
Volevo sapere perchè sono state cancellate le tracce dei resti di strada militare sui monti Cuar e Flagjel.

Grazie.
maicolgalante (2020-11-01 17:58:12+00:00): Ciao, non riesco a vedere di quale tratto parli. C'è un modo di visualizzare graficamente le modifiche fatte? Perché magari l'ho cancellata per errore, aggiungendo altri sentieri
ACarlotti (2020-11-01 01:01:05+00:00): Hmm, I thought I'd already made a change to reflect the different locations of the temporary and new slip roads, but I can't find that so I'll have to assume I'm misremembering.

One issue: you've disconnected the entrance to the Travelodge from the slip road
Ben Harris (2020-11-01 14:48:44+00:00): Disconnecting the access road wasn't entirely accidental. The site appears to be derelict and I didn't have any evidence that it was connected to the new slip-road.  On the other hand, I didn't notice any vehicular access to the site from the Bar Hill side either, and the plans and Order don't suggest it's meant to be disconnected.  I've reinstated the connection (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93370274), but it really needs someone to actually visit the site.
Alexmol (2020-11-12 12:41:06+00:00): Ficou uma way sem tags e fora de qualquer relação:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865742971
topolusitania (2020-11-13 12:32:29+00:00): Obrigado. Corrigido ;-)
Frans S (2020-11-05 11:16:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
eggie (2020-10-31 19:53:49+00:00): Oke.. Wat er niet meer is kan weg. Mocht het nog wel in de BAG staan dan kun je een terugmelding doen via de BAG viewer,, anders komen de gebouwen en adressen weer terug in de osm data bij periodieke updates.
gr eggie
NetDistrict (2020-10-31 22:17:47+00:00): Dan moet het goed komen, gecontroleerd in de BAG viewer.
PT-53 (2020-11-01 06:56:49+00:00): Wieso hast Du diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5780081093/history
gelöscht und dafür diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8069702282/history#map=18/48.14989/9.61766
neu angelegt.
Wieso soll es an dieser Haltestelle
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8069703605/history
keine Sitzbank geben?
Das gleiche bei dieser Haltestelle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3445684628/history
Und hier auch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3445684636/history#map=19/48.14873/9.60706
 verschoben?
Sint E7 (2020-11-01 08:49:49+00:00): Am erstens;
1) Auf dem Luftbild sehe ich eine Wende-Schleife für die Busse, also habe ich die Haltestelle in die Schleife gesetzt. Ich habe nür die knote verschoben, nicht gelosht und ein neues Gesendet. Mit ID siehe ich tatsächlich das die Haltestelle entlang der Straße ist. Ein Fehler von mir.
2) In JOSM brauche ich soweil die ESRI und Bing-bilder, jeweils Mappilary und so mehr. In das meisten der gefallen siehe ich allein eine haltestelle, und kein shelter oder Sitzbank. 

Als du ein bessere Quelle hat für bushaltestellen, dann würde ich gerne von dir hören. Dann kann der öffentliche Verkehr in DING auf besser von werden
PT-53 (2020-11-01 09:54:14+00:00): Dieser Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5780081093/history
bei der Wendeschleife  wurde von Dir gelöscht (oder lügt die History?) und dafür hast Du diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8069702282/history#map=18/48.14989/9.61766
neu angelegt!
Sint E7 (2020-11-01 18:35:29+00:00): Du war richtig; ich habe die Knote gelöst. Jetzt, wo ich mir die Luftbilder in OSM genauer ansehe, sehe ich, dass der Stopp tatsächlich entlang der Straße statt in der Schleife verläuft.
PT-53 (2020-11-03 14:02:12+00:00): Und bis wann berichtigst Du das wieder?
Sint E7 (2020-11-03 14:36:12+00:00): Der Bus_stop ist auf die ursprüngliche Position zurücksetzen und die buslinien sind sofort angepast.
slowtux (2020-12-18 22:35:46+00:00): Hallo, 
ist gemapte  Lage vom Ferienhaus richtig?
Nach der Beschreibung auf der Webseite vom Ferienhaus liegt diese weiter südlicher und ist auch schon eingezeichnet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353584938

mfg
Gregor
Mathi (2020-12-19 10:56:57+00:00): Hallo Gregor,
die Lage stimmt, dort ist in der Tat ein Ferienhaus mit eigener Webseite: https://www.ferienhaus-trebnitzgrund.de/.
Es kann sein, dass es mit zur Oberen Trebnitzmühle gehört, wird aber separat (siehe Webseite) vermarktet.

Viele Grüße
Mathias
slowtux (2020-12-19 15:59:06+00:00): Hallo Mathias,
aber die Adress-Daten sind dann meiner Meinung nach falsch. Die  gehören zu  Oberen Trebnitzmühle.
mfg
Gregor
Mathi (2020-12-20 22:01:17+00:00): Die Adresse steht auch so auf der Webseite. Vermutlich hat das Haus gar keine Hausnummer abbekommen.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:18:32+00:00): Hi, if you switch to Maxar Premium Imagery, you can see all of the details (you may have to realign it to the existing data). Also roads into a shopping centre are tagged as highway=service since they aren't residential roads.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
bradrh (2022-12-22 21:52:42+00:00): What is your source for naming this feature?  It doesn't show up as that on local maps, or usgs topo maps.
ACarlotti (2020-11-01 01:11:05+00:00): Surely Mill Common isn't oneway - it's a no through road.
I've removed the oneway tag in 93356498 - let me know if I've got it wrong somehow.
Mosharrafn (2020-10-31 20:37:38+00:00): Security Guard Service and Firefighting Equipment company
Glassman (2020-10-31 21:47:50+00:00): Tip: When adding separate sidewalks, tag the section between curbs as highway=footway + footway=crossing. You can also add crossing=marked/unmarked. 

If you need more help, check out my blog post https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/

I'll send you more information on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93351094
user_5359 (2022-01-29 07:18:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201933140. What is thee meaning of the tag yes = grade3
Sembola (2022-01-30 18:13:41+00:00): No meaning ;-)
Corrected
skyper (2020-11-01 13:33:34+00:00): Hallo kaeru
Mit Deinen Änderungen hast Du leider einige Relationen beschädigt. Zumindest die VAG-Buslinien 15, 16 und 24 sind davon betroffen und haben jetzt Lücken:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-RVF-Analysis.html#bus_15
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-RVF-Analysis.html#bus_16
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-RVF-Analysis.html#bus_24

Andere Relationen habe ich nicht geprüft.
Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen und korrigieren?

Danke und viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2020-11-03 12:50:01+00:00): Habe es repariert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93482017
highflyer74 (2020-10-31 21:07:53+00:00): Moin!

Ich habe hier nochmal dran herumgeschraubt und das Gebäude per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix mit demolished:building=* getaggt. Sei so nett, keine Gebäude zu löschen, die noch auf den verfügbaren Luftbildern sichtbar sind, da andere Mapper sie sonst wieder einzeichnen.

Du hattest ja als Hinweis zwei Nodes mit jeweils einer note=* stattdessen gesetzt, diese werden aber leicht übersehen und können auch nicht maschinell ausgewertet werden. Auch kann man nicht nachvollziehen, für welchen (ehemaligen) Gebäudeumriss der Node gilt, wenn sich die Luftbilder ändern und ggf ein neues Gebäude schon zu sehen ist.

Die Nutzung des Lifecycle Prefixes ist etabliert und hat sich als vorteilhaft erwiesen.

Schöne Grüße!
andergrin (2020-11-01 07:51:41+00:00): Там дійсно та колія ще лишилась? Здається, її всю вже демонтували. Якщо так, то на мапу нічого не наносимо
nordost456 (2020-11-01 08:13:40+00:00): Я позначив, що вона розібрана, хоча там ще є ділянки з коліями
andergrin (2020-11-01 08:17:43+00:00): Таке позначати не треба. Ми наносимо залізничну колію, якщо вона і інфраструктура справні, просто не використовуються. Якщо вона підрозібрана - тоді не наносимо. 
A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused
nordost456 (2020-11-01 08:19:50+00:00): Зрозумів, дякую за інформацію
eggie (2020-11-01 09:42:31+00:00): Yep.. Dat bruggetje zet je op surface=wood

Het is overigens fine_gravel ipv gravel_fine.. In je tags staat het overigens goed. 

mvg,
eggie
Bart_oppad (2020-11-01 12:40:07+00:00): Dank je, inmiddels aangepast.
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-12-13 15:38:14+00:00): Zur Notiz:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2452922
bzw. zum Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865751248
Quelle des Namens?
ACarlotti (2020-11-01 01:05:44+00:00): I think you put the traffic_signals tagging on the wrong node.
ACarlotti (2020-11-23 04:40:05+00:00): I've had another look at this, and judging by the Esri Imagery (and also Bing imagery, though it's clear there), I think the crossing is further east than where it was mapped. I'm also not sure why (or how) you edited the crossing anyway - you seem to have deleted and recreated one node, and copied the tags to a different node.

I think I've fixed/improved this in changeset 94610418.
frosm (2020-11-09 23:33:40+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
c'est un parc ou c'est une entreprise d'élevage ayant un espace vert extérieur qui n'a rien avoir avec un parc ?
et quel est le nom ? Elevage de St Bernard est une description, j'imagine donc que le nom est Ermitage de Saint Roch
bonne continuation
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:20:08+00:00): Hi, is lanes:bus not correct? From the usage statistics it seems to be accepted tagging to me?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-03 11:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-03 11:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:22:27+00:00): Hi, from what I can tell none of these bus lanes are physically separated from the main road and my understanding is that they shouldn't exist as separate ways if they are just separate lanes.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-03 11:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts
elgolfo (2020-11-08 19:56:58+00:00): Hallo _Schweini, du hast aus dem Verbindungsweg zwischen Zesch und Lindenbrück ein Waldweg gemacht, der für den Autoverkehr gesperrt sein würde. Das entspricht nicht der Realität vor Ort. Siehe auch die Antwort vom Forstamt dazu in der Diskussion hier [1]. Ich habe das wieder auf hw=unclassified gesetzt, ebenso das Stückchen zwischen Zesch und Egsdorf.

Viele Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89513877
goedegazelle (2020-11-01 00:03:14+00:00): Het tanken vindt plaats onder het dak en niet in het kantoortje.
eggie (2020-11-01 07:01:58+00:00): Op zich netjes gedaan. 
Even aangepast 'ter leering ende vermaeck'. 
Het gedeelte onder de kap getagd met covered=yes.
layer=1 is niet nodig, want het is maaiveldniveau. 
De nodes zitten vast aan de kap. 
De service loopt niet meer door het gebouw. service=drive_trough
De kap stond  op layer=-2, maar die staat nu op layer=1, want die ligt gedeeltelijk over het vaste gebouw.

De kap lijkt nu niet goed te liggen, maar klopt wel, want de luchtfoto is schuin genomen. Ik gebruik de BGT omtrekgericht als transparante achtergrond.

Je eigen edits om te vergelijken.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93353316
Rendering duurt soms even.. ctrl-F5 versnelt.. cache leegmaken. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-01 07:05:14+00:00): typo.. layer=1 > layer-1  niet nodig
wat maaiveldniveau.
DaCor (2020-11-04 10:40:23+00:00): Hi, can you clarify what this is that you have added to the map. You have added a point called east west mapping. What does this refer to?
ChrisM2517 (2020-11-04 15:15:05+00:00): Buisness address for https://eastwestmapping.ie/
DaCor (2020-11-04 20:50:51+00:00): Thank you for that. I have updated and moved the marker slightly. updated to include additional information from your website (contact details). 

Thanks, 
Dave
DaCor (2020-11-04 20:56:54+00:00): I should also mention, given the topic of your company, that you may find useful data to extract from OSM in particular boundary data, which can be obtained from townlands.ie

Happy Mapping!
tastrax (2020-11-02 07:30:04+00:00): Hi there - I was just wondering if you intended to mass delete all these buildings given that they all exist at the locations?(albeit maybe a bit misaligned)
nevw (2020-11-02 07:57:12+00:00): I have restored the buildings and Anderson Street
IlBano (2020-11-01 09:32:57+00:00): Ciao,
in questo changeset hai duplicato i nodi della fermata dell'autobus "Murisengo (bv. Villadeati)" creando di fatto 2 fermate per ogni senso di marcia. Penso che tu volessi applicare lo schema Public Transport V2, differenziando fra platform e stop_position, ma in questo caso hai duplicato tutti i tag.
L'uso di stop_position non è necessario, se non in casi complessi in ambito urbano quando la pensilina di attesa e il posto in cui si ferma il bus sono relazionati in modo ambiguo.
Nel caso specifico siamo in aperta campagna e le fermate sono rappresentate dal solo paletto di fermata.
andergrin (2020-11-01 07:42:51+00:00): Муніципальний ринок вже нанесено на мапу
Warin61 (2020-11-05 06:35:42+00:00): Partial reversion - broken boundary of National Park.
jmapb (2021-06-07 15:21:00+00:00): Hi George, is this a publicly accessible hiking trail? I'm wondering because it looks like the road it departs from, Nordic Drive, might be for private use only: 

https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=06949a7a-7619-46c1-bca8-55f7ed80ce1a&cp=42.025561~-74.147495&lvl=19&dir=266.22766&pi=-4.015408&style=x&mo=z.3.35&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Thanks, Jason
jmapb (2021-06-07 21:20:35+00:00): [Resolved -- it's a public trail. Nordic Road is private but allows foot traffic from parking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8812774745 to the trailhead.]
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:24:15+00:00): Hi, for small walkways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865773725/history it's best to be mapped as a footway rather than a pedestrian street (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
WoodWoseWulf (2020-11-01 02:40:35+00:00): Hi Joshuathor,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additions to the map.

Please keep in mind that this is not a residential directory. It's best to avoid listing who lives in certain houses and also to limit the mapping of private residential property to very basic details such as permanent buildings, driveways, and larger pools.

More reading to help you out:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Thanks again for your contributions! Happy mapping.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:25:35+00:00): Hi, its good practice in OSM to leave changeset comments rather than nothing as it makes it easier for other mappers to tell what you have done. e.g. "added grass and footpath near Minchin Drive" is better than "."

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:27:24+00:00): Hi, this petrol station is already mapped as a node here, so a choice needs to be made about whether to represent the station as an outline or as a node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1836362663). Duplicating features isn't correct practice.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
tastrax (2020-11-02 07:27:38+00:00): Hi there - I was just wondering if you intended to mass delete all these buildings given that they all exist at the locations?(albeit maybe a bit misaligned)
nevw (2020-11-02 07:55:45+00:00): I have restored these buildings and realigned them using corrected Ersi imagery.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:29:35+00:00): Hi, if this building is ancillary to the main building then it shouldn't have any place of worship tagging as it implies that there are two churches here, not one.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 04:31:00+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865779413 has the building=yes tag but from what I can see it's only the grass outline?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
nevw (2020-11-01 11:18:57+00:00): Hi
You have deleted a large number of buildings in this edit.
Has this been mistakenly done? Or have the buildings been razed through fire or other calamity.
Do you want me to restore the deleted map items?
TTG11 (2020-11-01 21:05:55+00:00): Hi Nevw,

This was part of the firewater map-a-thon hosted by SSSI hosted last weekend. One of the validators requested for the building polygons to be removed. 


Rgds
TTG11
nevw (2020-11-02 01:58:56+00:00): Hi
the buildings appear to all exist in satellite imagery and were also well mapped.
Are you aware of the reason for their removal?
nevw (2020-11-02 02:11:40+00:00): I raised the issue on the talk.au list to elicit further comment.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2020-November/date.html
TTG11 (2020-11-02 02:43:24+00:00): The validator’s request was to remove the building polygons so as to only leave the water sources (water tanks, swimming pools & reservoirs). However, this may have been an error and the same request was made with the surrounding tiles, to which I was not sure if anyone else edited.

May I refer you to history section if you are able to access the tileset on HOT for further clarification, as I do not have access to the project anymore.

Kind Regards
tastrax (2020-11-02 03:41:34+00:00): I very much suspect this was an error - I would suggest that the deletion is reverted. The mapathon had access to high resolution imagery and I suspect that none of the buildings matched the imagery and therefore someone requested deletion.
nevw (2020-11-02 04:17:19+00:00): Yes, I have decided that it would be best to reinstate the buildings. 
It seems like just an error in judgement by the validator or as you say a mismatch with higher resolution imagery.
tastrax (2020-11-02 04:35:40+00:00): Many thanks
nevw (2020-11-02 06:07:16+00:00): These buildings have been restored.
Thanks all
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-22 11:21:55+00:00): maro21, I think you wrong here.

Recycling is not waste baskets only. 

Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fridge , there are a note in "See also":

> amenity=recycling for community fridge helping reduce food waste

And here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

There are two tags: recycling:food and recycling:food_waste.

I want to have possibility to find places to bring electronics/food/anything else for reusing. Reusing is the best type of recycling. Try to find, for example, in OsmAnd, how to recycle something. There are a lot of categories, and almost nothing found in Wrocław.
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-29 21:14:07+00:00): maro21?
ivanbranco (2021-11-20 13:02:25+00:00): Hi Sekerob,

this gas station (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865781651) also needs a double check, this ref:mise belongs to this gas station: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5985949165
SekeRob (2021-11-20 16:06:51+00:00): Something is not kosher in the region with fuel stations, e.g. Q8 on Enzo Ferrari, Pescara remains untraceable, though very active. Unfortunately i lost access to the register which shows the coordinates as sure fire connection. Website changed and did not find new link. Maybe you can point me the way, my last secuured refresh is from end of 2020.

Anyway that coppa station has been there forever, very non brand, passed it many times and never seen a soul there, Fuel by 2 vending machines just in the afternoon shade of the motorway bridge. Not even a roof.
ivanbranco (2021-11-20 17:09:12+00:00): The register with the coordinates should be here: https://www.mise.gov.it/index.php/it/open-data/elenco-dataset/2032336-carburanti-prezzi-praticati-e-anagrafica-degli-impianti
SekeRob (2021-11-20 18:10:20+00:00): Does not exist by coordinates. Unfortunately when the original POI was merged to the building the back history got lost. Took a picture at the time of the totem, they're very real.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-01 00:34:24+00:00): Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8070013850#map=2/-2.6/37.0 has appeared in the Southern Indian Ocean rather than Ohio somehow?
SomeoneElse (2020-11-06 23:36:31+00:00): I've removed the "playground in the middle of the sea" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93688741 .
gabro00 (2020-11-01 11:25:50+00:00): Szia!

Szegeden a Kárász utca miért lett vízmosás (ford=yes)?

Néhány parkolóhelyre capacity=1-et raktál, de ez fölösleges, hisz alapértelmezés. Hasonló okból pl. utcákra sem rakunk oneway=no-t.

A helyrajzi számoknak külön címkéje van, az addr:conscriptionnumber.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:conscriptionnumber

POI-kat nem szoktunk épület vonalába olvasztani.

Javítottam a hibákat, legközelebb ügyelj ezekre.
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-31 23:47:20+00:00): Hi, please use Maxar imagery if what you see in this area doesn’t match OSIP 6in. OSIP 6in is the most up-to-date high-resolution imagery in the area, but Bing and Maxar are more up-to-date.
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-01 00:31:29+00:00): Regarding the fixmes on misaligned buildings, it’s a much broader issue: back in 2009 or so, I drew many buildings in Cincinnati by tracing Yahoo! Aerial Imagery in Potlatch 1. Yahoo! imagery was already grainy at zoom level 17, and Potlatch 1 lacked a way to square the corners of an area. So it’s a mess. Rather than individually tagging each of those buildings, perhaps you’d be interested in helping with phase 2 (manual conflation) of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hamilton_County_Building_Import ? Some of the buildings you tagged with fixme came from the CAGIS dataset, which seems to be based on LiDAR, so I’d expect them to be very well aligned in general.
Mashin (2020-11-01 19:38:58+00:00): Hi, 
Good work on adding all the buildings. But please don't delete existing driveways. Those are valid data.

Also what I noticed, when you are converting node into area feature, please transfer all the tags to the new object, not only the name.

thanks
aharvey (2020-11-01 22:21:39+00:00): not sure if you read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity#Complex_areas but it says there is no agreed solution for campus names vs uni name. It says you could use the name for the campus name and operator for the uni name, but I don't think that's helpful here. I went to uni here but generally just know it as UNSW and don't think of it as the Kensington Campus. Maybe for now we can just add a tag campus=Kensington
Victor709 (2020-11-01 02:39:59+00:00): MV Sithole,17072973, 01/11/2020