piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rbuch703 (2015-07-30 07:02:20+00:00): Hi, the root issue was that Walton Wood was an invalid multipolygon: it was made up of many closed outer ways that *shared edges*. As I understand it, this is is not allowed for OSM multipolygons, and will lead to inconsistent results. For example, Mapnik treated Walton Wood not as a single merged multipolygon area, but treated every closed way separately and put a separate label on it. 

As I understand it, the usual solution is to modify the multipolygon so that in contains only the outline for the whole area (plus any existing holes) and not the individual subareas anymore. But this means either adding additional ways  that will overlap completely with the existing ones. Or it means to split the existing ways so that they can be used to define the individual lots (which get turned into multipolygons themselves) as well as the overall multipolygon. Both approaches are suboptimal (you either get overlapping ways that are hard to edit and keep in sync, or you get many multipolygons with a similar problem). I have seen both approaches used in OSM about equally, and somewhat arbitrarily chose the latter approach as it felt cleaner (since it does not introduce any redundancies).
SomeoneElse (2015-07-30 16:16:20+00:00): As I understand it, "Mapnik" (the software) just selects data from the database that it is presented with. What gets in there depends on the flags that osm2pgsql is passed when it populates the database, specifically "--multi-geometry". Of the layers on the osm.org site, the "standard" layer has this unset and the "humanitarian" layer has it set. It's that that causes the "multiple labels" thing. Have a look at Paul Norman's blog post about it; that's probably the best description I've seen. I've not seen rendering "problems" due to adjacent multipolygon ways, just the expected label duplication without the --multi-geometry flag and the "only the largest one gets labelled" effect with it, both of which are expected and as documented. Where were you seeing a problem?
For completeness, I have a tile-server set up with --multi-geometry that also renders leaf_type, and that did show Walton Wood OK at least as woodland.  
There is an issue logged against osm2pgsql to say "should --multi-polygon be the default"; I'm not aware of an "operations" one to say "reload the "standard" layer with it set", though I think there's been some discussion in github. There are known issues with osm2pgsql/osm carto where a tag causes an item to have a multipolygon created from it but the sql doesn't support it (see the help question mentioning highway=raceway recently), there's a know issue that can sometimes affect roundabouts, and I suspect that when some tags are common and some not we perhaps ought to look at which tags osm2pgsql promotes (but i'm probably best placed to do that and haven't had chance yet).
My problem with the "individual edges making up one or more relations, which in turn form part of a larger relation" is that as things stand it's essentially impossible to edit, even by someone familiar with osm data. A newcomer to osm just wanting to record that "these trees are conifers" would have no chance.
OpenStreetMap's most precious commodity is mappers; anything that we do that makes it less likely for them to edit the map is detrimental to OSM as a whole.
Weide (2015-07-29 15:08:49+00:00): Bitte die Routen an die Änderung anpassen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 12:07:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355169191/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
maning (2015-08-03 03:16:25+00:00): Hi, some of the roads you added doesn't appear on the ground (judging by the satellite imagery).  Can you confirm that these are indeed roads?  My hunch is that they are brgy/village boundaries.  Thanks!
Ethon (2015-08-12 13:16:41+00:00): indeed sir,  pls tell how can i make a boundaries on the map...
maning (2015-08-13 02:44:24+00:00): OK, first let me check what is the source of this boundary.  Where did you get it and do you have an explicit permission to add this in OSM?  I am also planning to revert this changeset and lets do a separate upload once its clear that it is OK to be added in OSM.
maning (2015-08-13 04:33:05+00:00): FYI, I reverted this changeset as per our discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33304246

Let's prepare a separate changeset for the boundaries.  To continue discussion, send me a message via OSM messaging.
Ethon (2015-08-13 08:13:17+00:00): the data was from the province...
MKnight (2015-10-11 08:58:48+00:00): Wenn Du links änderst, dann bitte richtig, und nich wahllos links und service zerstückeln. 

Die Service auf der Raste habe ich wieder auf Link zurückgeändert.

das ist nicht das einzige Changeset, wo Du unverbundene Links stehengelassen hast, hier waren Deine Änderungen aber komplett falsch.
luschi (2015-10-13 16:45:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11770075 würde ich als service mappen. da der Weg nicht zum Verlassen oder Erreichen der A 7 verwendet wird.
MKnight (2015-10-13 17:10:26+00:00): stimmt, hab ich übersehen, is korrigiert.
literan (2015-07-29 10:11:52+00:00): ну и нафига столько точек понаделали? поудалял все кроме одной, выбрал на свой вкус.
AnderPijoan (2015-08-02 16:55:09+00:00): Carretera incorrectamente movida y encanghada a un edificio.
martinum4 (2015-09-10 19:31:00+00:00): Hallo, was sollte das bei 256144364 und 162094960 ? Du führst irgendwie deine selbst eingebrachten Argumente von http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32776900 ins Leere wenn du Auf-/Abfahrten dermaßen ummappst...
Nakaner (2015-07-28 15:16:28+00:00): für diesen Changeset wurde auch das Luftbild der Stadt Stuttgart verwendet
streckenkundler (2015-07-28 17:05:37+00:00): Das ganze Areal als "Bergbaufolgelandschaft" zu benennen und es als brownfield zu bezeichen, ist absoluter Unsinn. Mit diesem Hintergrund könnte man ein gefühltes Drittel Südbrandenburgs bezeichen. Auch steht sn keiner Stelle "Bergbaufolgelandschaft" auf einem Schild.

Auch Brownfield ist quatsch. Auf diesen Flächen wird es in absehbarer Zeit (mind. 100 Jahre!) keine größere Bebauung (Siedlungs- oder Industriebauten) geben.
Arubiwolf (2015-07-28 21:39:09+00:00): Da muss ich Ihnen Recht geben, dass brownfield den Sachverhalt einer Bergbaufolgelandschaft nicht direkt trifft. Ich habe mit der Bezeichnung eine Näherung durchgeführt. Schließlich ist es ein durch Braunkohleindustrie genutzter Raum, der durch Konversionsprozesse im vergleich zu Brownfield (Industriebrache) bereits eine Folgenutzung erhalten hat. Doch beim gesamten Areal handelt es sich eine Bergbaufolgelandschaft des Tagebau Meuro, dessen Restloch (Restloch Meuro) , den heutigen Großräschener See darstellt. Ich werde sehen welche Landnutzungskateorie eher dem entspricht. In Topografischen Karten des Landesvermessungsamts Brandenburg ist dieses Areal - und natürlich auch einige weitere im Lausitzer Revier - als Bergbaufolgelandschaft gekennzeichnet. Ich hielte es schon für wichtig diesen Sachverhalt der räumlichen Ausstattung der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen.
maraf24 (2015-08-02 07:59:28+00:00): Nieprawda, to nie jest dworzec, ale punkt z nazwą stacji kolejowej.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-29 22:32:04+00:00): As you've spotted, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32832749 changed some tags on "Priština International Airport" so that some tags such as "is_in:country=Србија" appeared (and also re-added 3 extra "Priština International Airport" nodes).  You've deleted 3 of the duplicates here but some of the remaining tags might checking.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-29 22:32:42+00:00): (typo - that should be "might need checking" of course).
kragon77 (2015-07-30 15:54:03+00:00): I have deleted and changed because of a write in Serbian that. I said last time in Kosovo that nobody understands there are indeed 95% Albanians.Please do not change, because I have drawn many roads. Thank You.This is Kosovo, not Serbia
maraf24 (2015-08-02 07:56:06+00:00): Proszę więcej nie kasować budynków i adresów.
de vries (2015-07-29 18:21:32+00:00): Hoi Henk, 

welkom bij osm!

Goed opgemerkt, die verkeerd benoemde straten. Ik heb wel de limietlaan die je getekend had veranderd in een "unclasified" weg. "secondary" is nl bedoeld voor de wat belangrijkere wegen. voor meer informatie over tags kan je terecht op de wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org .

Als je nog ergens hulp bij nodig hebt kun je mij een berichtje sturen of terecht op het forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12


mvg
eggie (2021-04-09 19:59:53+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het bijdragen, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
habi (2022-11-04 09:31:33+00:00): Ciao threefoursixninefour
You've added `access=private` to a lot of (high)ways in this changeset.
I'm wondering if these are all 'Zubringerdienst' roads, which would better be mapped with `motor_vehicle=destination` or something else according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Other_common_Signs
Greetings,
habi
mweper (2015-07-28 17:59:26+00:00): Hola Pablo. Para un mejor etiquetado de la escuela, te aconsejo leer este enlace: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Saludos y gracias por colaborar.
kartler175 (2015-08-01 11:00:22+00:00): Auch wenn Du es immer wieder versuchst, wird der way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362812703 im Leben kein ein inner-member des MP https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18158. Das ist schon rein technisch falsch. Und inaltlich logisch ist das ein völlig eigenständiges Waldstück und deshalb auch kein outer-member
mweper (2015-07-28 17:59:11+00:00): Hola Pablo. Para un mejor etiquetado de la escuela, te aconsejo leer este enlace: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Saludos y gracias por colaborar.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-13 18:44:31+00:00): Hi! I just found 14 relations tagged exactly identically for TEC 167A bus routes... Some have an identical route (same members), others slightly different... Is this normal? Very unlikely but who knows... Or did you get mixed up because of the gazillion variations? But how can a bus route with a certain reference have different variations otherwise i don't see how people can find the right bus.
kdano (2015-07-30 03:59:59+00:00): szerintem valahova kell az amenity=hospital, mert itt kórház(ak) van(nak).
és mivel ez alapvetően szerintem is egy egyetemi campus, ezért jelöltem egyesével kórháznak az épületeket.

sajnos a wiki nem nagyon alkalmazható erre az esetre, volt is egy kapcsolódó kérdés a vitalapon, de arra sem válaszolt senki két év alatt..
MarsupilamiEater (2015-07-30 08:53:26+00:00): Én feltettem erről egy kérdést és jött rá használható válasz:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/38285/how-to-tag-campus-buildings-that-also-in-practical-use
Mindenképpen alapvetően a terület egyetemi. Az épületek pedig semmiképpen nem amenity=hospital-ok. A válasz alapján módosítottam a jelenlegi állapotra, de annyit még hozzá lehetne rakni amit a válasz is említ hogy készítesz egy újabb területet amelyen a kórházak vannak és arra ráraksz egy amenity=hospital-t. Esetleg egy darab pontként jelölöd. Én ezt nem tettem meg mert nem tudom pontosan mely épületek kórházi épületek és ha körberajzolod a területüket akkor csak azokat kéne körberajzolni.
BCNorwich (2015-08-02 15:24:48+00:00): Hi, looks like there's something wrong with the East Finchley Station Buildings.
keder (2015-09-29 18:25:04+00:00): А почему "там где нет воды", на бинге много где есть, я сейчас по нескольким источникам сверяюсь. Рано или поздно я поправлю все водный объекты, нет нужды всё править. Где ещё ты правил водные объекты?
EugenyN (2015-09-30 06:06:39+00:00): Привет! Я массово исправил в этом куске на drystream по дефолту. Т.к. 90% там drystream. Потом перепроверил вручную и вернул intermittent stream там, где заметна вода на спутнике.  Но наверно есть моменты ,которые пропустил. Так что если заметишь исправляй.  Сейчас почти месяц путешествуют по Грузии. Пишу с планшета. Собрал много треков. Приеду дней через 10 буду обрисовывать :)
keder (2015-09-30 06:30:44+00:00): По Грузии? Завидую, там сейчас тепло и красиво. А по поводу водных веев: я сейчас по-тихоньку прохожу по Воронежской области и добавляю и правлю границы НП, названия урочищ, водный и археологические объекты и еще всякое по-мелочи. Я использую как основной источник Генпланы, сверяюсь с генштабовскими картами и естественно смотрю по бингу и мапнику наличие воды, пересыхание и тд. По-этому нет особой нужды их править - лучше статусы получить можно только обходом. Думаю за осень и зиму я закончу и поправлю их все.
EugenyN (2015-09-30 07:08:43+00:00): Отлично. Прямо сейчас пишу с пляжа Батуми :)
flohoff (2015-08-02 16:51:17+00:00): Hi,
ich habe eben deinen Changeset gefunden. Wenn das wirklich Privatzufahrten sind dann würde ich da keinen Namen draufpacken. Die sind ja nicht öffentlich und die Stadt hat ja da auch keine Namenswidmung ausgesprochen. 

Flo
Havo (2016-06-13 17:53:57+00:00): Korrekt !
MKnight (2016-06-13 20:42:18+00:00): Mhh?
dolphinling (2015-07-29 11:53:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset 32954519.

Please stop changing roads into residential. These aren't residential roads. You've done this in a lot of your changes in different areas and it's not okay.
maciek-szn (2015-07-28 19:34:47+00:00): highway = stop powinien być wstawiony na punkcie, w miejscu znaku STOP.

Nie można drogi oznaczać jako highway = stop (zresztą w tym miejscu jest już highway = residential).

Poprawiłem.
d3mol3k (2015-07-28 19:47:41+00:00): Dzięki więc w jaki sposób oznaczać stop na przejeździe kolejowym - poprawnie?
Dzięki za poprawienie
maciek-szn (2015-07-28 20:13:01+00:00): No tak jak napisałem - punkt w miejscu znaku STOP (czyli będzie jeden punkt przed przejazdem kolejowym i jeden za - oba oznakowane jako highway = stop).
d3mol3k (2015-07-28 20:25:10+00:00): Dzięki. I jeszcze jedno pytanie odnośnie takiego miejsca w Szczecinie - wyniesiona powierzchnia jezdni przy przystanku tramwajowym - próg zwalniający długości 18 m (coś koło tego) - to miejsce w linku https://goo.gl/maps/Y83cG
maciek-szn (2015-07-28 20:31:57+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia, jak tagować przystanki wiedeńskie. Nie ma takiego rozwiązania w dokumentacji na Wiki OSM. Dodatkową kwestią jest to, że przystanek wiedeński dotyczy jedynie jednego kierunku i jedynie jednego z czterech pasów ruchu. Zatem tagowanie byłoby jakieś wyjątkowo skomplikowane. Chyba lepiej sobie odpuścić.
d3mol3k (2015-07-28 20:34:32+00:00): Bo tego nawet nie można chyba jakoś prosto opisać tu jako próg zwalniający. OK dzięki jeszcze raz.
dolphinling (2015-07-29 11:56:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset 32954650.

Quarry Hill road does not have a loop there in any imagery I can find. Why do you think it has that loop? Please use changeset comments, source tags, or really ANY way of giving reasoning for your edits. Also, this change removed the name from part of Quarry Hill Road.
GerdP (2015-11-30 22:00:27+00:00): Hallo!
Bitte prüfen, offensichtlich ein Tippfehler:
maxspeed=2
Bing zeigt lanes:forward=1, aber Du hast
lanes=backward=1 erfasst. 
Wahrscheinlich wolltest Du das auf 2 ändern und hast versehentlich maxspeed erwischt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26553488
boneco (2015-07-29 02:21:01+00:00): fernando, ao criar vias, deve atribuir caracteristicas para elas, informar por exemplo que ela é uma estrada rural ou uma residencia, você não fez isso com todas as vias que você criou.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836604
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836607
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836609
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362836610

É só selecionar a via, e do lado esquerdo direito informar que é uma estrada e o tipo de estrada que você quer.

Qualquer dúvida, pode perguntar.
Jojo4u (2015-07-29 08:40:50+00:00): Jede primary sollte einen Namen haben. Welchen vergibst du?
boneco (2015-07-30 22:14:44+00:00): O ponto que você apagou representa um povoado da região. Você pode verificar essas localidades na camada do IBGE Rural
jharpster (2017-01-04 20:38:58+00:00): Noticed that you mapped a proposed highway (way=297430771). Normally only map things that are verifiable on the ground. Also not visible on Bing imgaery.
Skippern (2017-01-04 20:53:31+00:00): These proposed highways are part of the official federal BR highway structure, and are on data available from official sources (DNIT is the Department of National Transport Infrastructure) Some of these have been on proposed stage for decades, but they form part of the complete network, and sometimes ties together completed part of a highway. There is a consensus to keep the proposed part of BR highways.
Jojo4u (2015-07-29 18:52:50+00:00): Hallo Mammi, die Linksabbiegerspur nach war Luftbild Stuttgart ausgerichtet und ist tasächlich so ausladend. Ich habe es entsprechen wieder erweitert, aber diesmal so dass der service nicht kreuzt.
Mammi71 (2015-07-30 15:58:33+00:00): hab mich an bing orientiert, an der gestrichelten Linie zwischen den beiden Linksabbiegerspuren. Die Busse nach Cannstatt fahren tatsächlich auf dem stadtwärtigen Bahngleis bis zur Haltelinie vor und über fahren beim Links abbiegen nur eine der beiden entgegenkommenen Linksabbiegerspuren. Ich würde daher auch beide knapp aneinander vorbeiführen.
cesarosejo (2015-07-28 20:49:47+00:00): Vía de tercer orden que una a San Pedro de Huaca con La Parroquia Sta. Martha de Cuva
lezurdis (2015-07-29 12:23:05+00:00): Olá,

Quê querias fazer quando desenhaste esta linha :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362847263

Parece-me ser um teste ?

Nunca devemos salvaguardar testes, só colocamos objetos reais no OSM.

Podes-me confirmar que foi um teste, assim desfaço esta alteração.
AndersAndersson (2015-07-29 06:01:38+00:00): This seems a bit strange.

This node of a riverbank got the name Hippopotamus and a cuisine tag. No amenity tag or anything else.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31717435
frodrigo (2015-07-29 09:17:15+00:00): Yes. I know the problem. This changeset was made with an experimental editor. I keep the error to show at dev people. Now it fixed.
Herbert167 (2015-10-08 08:40:00+00:00): Ausgerechnet jetzt, wo sich auf der gegenüberliegenden Straßenseite eine neue DHL Zustellbasis in Bau befindet, wird dieses zuvor namenlose Gebäude [Weg: DHL (224113309)], DHL benannt. Das kann sich ja wohl nur um eine Verwechselung handeln. 
http://www.goldbeck.de/uploads/webcam/rm0141/current.jpg
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanisierte_Zustellbasis#Liste_der_mechanisierten_Zustellbasen
extarnel (2015-10-08 10:27:03+00:00): Sie haben Recht, es handelt sich dabei um dir Firma Polyclip,
Das Gebäude scheint die Straßenseite gewechselt zu haben, da ich es auf der richtigen Seite benannt habe.
mweper (2015-07-29 01:49:05+00:00): Hola Claudia. Por favor, no agregues nodos de cosas que ya están mapeadas, esto genera una redundancia innecesaria.
Si quieres modificar algún dato de la escuela, hazlo en el área que ya está colocada.
--
Por favor, elimina el nodo que creaste, ya que, ya existen esos datos.
AMDmi3 (2015-07-30 14:54:11+00:00): Hi!

А улица Мальского не "улица Жени Мальского" (http://kladr-rf.ru/23/000/006/002/0008/)?
farmal (2019-07-23 02:47:18+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 245634672
classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 13:55:39+00:00): That particular highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245634672) should follow my earlier argument: this stretch of highway is not in an adjacent residential estate. It may carry more significant traffic than the adjacent residential highways because it acts as a collector highway to the adjacent trunk highway.
Ser9ei (2021-04-18 07:12:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362867164 - это и все, что рядом, явно не garden, а landuse=grass или =flowerbed
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:31:51+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:31:48+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:31:42+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:31:38+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
user_599436 (2015-09-22 00:49:12+00:00): Some ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218179141 are incorrect after changing oneway=-1 to oneway=yes.
Zeke76 (2015-09-22 02:36:29+00:00): Thank you for bringing that to my attention. I found several that were wrong and have corrected them.
hgocat (2015-07-30 18:57:25+00:00): El entronque entre Manuel Gómez Morín y Nuevo Periférico no está actualizado en la imagen satelital. En 2014 se inauguró el paso elevado que conecta al Nuevo Periférico.
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:30:53+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:30:45+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:30:33+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:30:22+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
k_zoar (2015-07-29 05:30:09+00:00): source was not Bing.
Correctly source is the GSI/KIBAN 2500, 2015-01-01
mcdlee (2015-07-29 08:02:18+00:00): Thank you
5m4u9 (2016-11-01 19:48:40+00:00): joost porqué grave_yard en vez de cemetery?
joost schouppe (2016-11-02 09:06:59+00:00): grave_yard si es cementerio donde la iglesia, cemetery si es cementerio por separado. Pero bien posible que me confundí.
5m4u9 (2016-11-02 16:03:22+00:00): surge la duda porque con los de osm argentina discutíamos cuál es a cuál y cada uno tiene una versión distinta.

en Bolivia por las imagenes no es posible saber si hay una iglesia/capilla/lo que sea religioso en un cementerio. también está que casi toda bolivia es religiosa incluso en la muerte y es cristiana (católica), pero cualquiera puede enterrarse en los cementerios y no vi que sea de sólo cristianos, excepto los de las comunidades extranjeras. en resumen:

* si no se sabe nada, cemetery

* si tuviese lugar de oración, grave_yard

¿cómo ves este planteamiento?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072533 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
piligab (2017-02-22 16:05:02+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found some overlapped ways, such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363054105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363054082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362907011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362902075
could you please confirm or delete them? 
Regards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072532 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072531 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072529 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
maraf24 (2015-07-29 16:18:50+00:00): Nie ma w tym budynku po prawej klatki z adresem 143c?
Vitalts (2015-07-30 13:32:05+00:00): А зачем? Это же объездная - неотъемлемая часть E20.