piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2020-07-23 13:19:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подъездам не присваивают адреса. Адрес присваивают целому зданию.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:entrance  
  
Пример подъезда:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4884837801
Ser9ei (2021-06-23 06:13:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829229689/ а почему это туннель, да ещё и на -1 слое? Это же открытые галлереи на 2-м этаже и идут они вдоль фасадов здания параллельно друг другу.
dzidek23 (2020-07-26 21:46:29+00:00): zagadzam się co do samej korekty ale ten element dachu nie powinien być chyba osobnym tagiem roof.
Think of Home (2020-07-27 08:47:56+00:00): W zasadzie też tak uważam, ale nie miałem tu pomysłu jak bez niszczenia czyjejś pracy doprowadzić to do stanu poprawnego. Teraxz zastanawiam się, czy wszystkie człony budynku nie przemianować na building:parts i objąć je pojedynczym obrysem z tagiem building=yes
Nmxosm (2020-07-23 13:37:26+00:00): Hallo TeleDoctor24,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine Änderungen.

Für den Tag office=* gibt es im OpenStreetMap-Wiki ein paar Standardwerte, damit Programme die Daten sinnvoll auswerten können (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:office). Dann passt TeleDoctor24 eher in den Namen (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Names). Eventuell sind Kontaktdaten auch noch interessant (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:contact).

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2021-02-21 07:24:11+00:00): Mit https://osm.org/changeset/99669438 korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
aceman444 (2020-08-20 20:00:14+00:00): Hi, please do not change crossing=uncontrolled to the crossing=marked. I assume it is you iD editor doing it (which has needlessly invented this tag), so please find a way to stop it. Thanks.
AndyB_66 (2020-07-23 18:29:30+00:00): Kolego - wycofaj, proszę, swoje bezsensowne zmiany - mają się nijak do rzeczywistości.
rifoxedek (2020-08-09 13:15:36+00:00): NIE
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-23 01:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94603516 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in Poland following some requests from the local community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4207 for more details.
martianfreeloader (2023-06-04 19:34:36+00:00): Hi,
Could you help with this note?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3720678
trigpoint (2020-07-23 16:55:25+00:00): Reverted
trigpoint (2020-07-26 16:00:07+00:00): Hi, just wondering why you have removed the bus_stop tags?

Many users and applications use them, not to mention OSM carto.

Please restore them.

Cheers Phil
Edward Smith (MilPop14) (2020-07-26 16:18:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for commenting. The ones that I removed the bus_stop tags from were individual stands at bus stations. To me it made more sense to not have each stand individually rendered with the name of the bus station shown many times overlapping. The ÖPNVKarte transport map shows the specific bus stands along with the relevant letter / number though I have just noticed that this is not the case for the other transport map. The wiki (quoted below) does not make it clear as to whether the individual stands within a bus station should be tagged as a bus stop.

"A highway=bus_stop would be a place on a particular bus route where the bus regularly stops to pick up / drop off passengers. An amenity=bus_station would usually be a terminus where many routes stop / start, and where you can change between routes, etc."

Looking around the map however it does seem the practice of tagging each bus stand as a stop is the most widely adopted so I will add the bus_stop tags back in at some point this evening. Sorry about this.
trigpoint (2020-07-26 16:21:04+00:00): Thank you
The name does seem redundant to me as that is on the overall bus station but routes start from a particular stop within the bus station so mapping them is useful to help passengers find the right stop.

Cheers Phil
Cebderby (2020-07-29 15:15:45+00:00): Thanks for restoring the vital highway=bus_stop tags.  
Can you review whether changing bus= to psv= is really what is meant (eg at Derby bus station).  If I understand correctly psv is bus and taxi; bus is correct for bus only.  
Also by marking ways access=no (with eg psv=desig.) it blocks foot, when the way and its sidewalks is the route to the stop and often appropriate (outside bus station areas).  Other combinations like motor_vehicle=no,bus=yes can be good (if foot and cycle is ok) or go with access=no;bus/psv=...;foot=yes
Edward Smith (MilPop14) (2020-07-29 15:37:51+00:00): Apologies about that. I was using the Highways/Streets/Road Retrictions dialog within JOSM which for whatever reason doesn't seem to have a dropdown for buses - just PSV and tourist buses strangely. JOSM does seem to be missing support for some bus related tags. This and the PSV tag being used in some places elsewhere that I edit made me think that bus=yes was not valid on ways but upon further inspection on the wiki it does appear to be. I agree that using the tag bus is better and more specific for the purpose of a bus station. In the case of Derby there is a mixture of bus and coach bays and it seems that pedestrian access is only to the outer areas. I will amend the tagging accordingly later this evening as well as at some other bus stations / areas. Thank you for your constructive comments which I will also apply to my future mapping.
trigpoint (2020-07-23 16:55:56+00:00): Reverted
trigpoint (2020-07-23 16:56:07+00:00): Reverted
Ezagren (2020-12-21 03:13:19+00:00): Ini ngaco, masa jalan lintas provinsi diubah jadi kanal, sih? Untung saya patroli. Kalau tidak, bakal berbulan-bulan seperti ini.
Alan Bragg (2020-07-27 16:01:37+00:00): Chris, Points are fine for addresses. Thanks. Alan
Mike Raust (2020-09-29 14:23:34+00:00): Hi Dorice,

where is the AI getting it's roads from?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829265625/history is clearly not existing anymore since the school was built, which is at least a few years ago.

Kind regards,
Mike
russdeffner (2020-09-30 04:03:21+00:00): Hi Mike, the data is generated using satellite imagery, basically MAXAR Premium, which can be several years old. Looking at this 'road' it does look like in the past it was much more of a road but still shows up kind of looking like a path in the more recent imagery (still probably a few years back). If you have local knowledge, feel free to update this to it's current use/condition. Happy Mapping!
rab (2020-10-01 15:07:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83652780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83040883
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81696471

Is there any concept to keep this data up to date in the future? My fear is that this will not work in Tanzania.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2068874#map=19/-6.83973/39.23852&layers=N
russdeffner (2020-10-03 02:58:52+00:00): Hi rab - yes, HOT is partnering with local NGO OMDTZ on this project. They are based in Dar es Salaam and are working every day to build up the local community in Tanzania. Thanks for asking!
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-30 14:25:58+00:00): Hello makren,

was it just an accident, that you create this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829250432 with tracktype=path?

Cheers
makren (2021-01-18 21:48:13+00:00): hello Ze0zohk1,
no, it was intedend because the track reduces to an informal path in that part. 
Best
eggie (2020-07-23 17:51:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
DD1GJ (2020-08-17 19:29:24+00:00): Teilrevert, Stolpersteine wieder einzeln.

Die Steine sind einzeln verlegt und werden enzeln erfasst. Entsprechende Programme zeigen sie an:
http://www.historic.place/themes/stolpersteine/index.html?zoom=19&lat=49.9627&lon=8.05975&layers=B0000TT
blackboxlogic (2020-07-23 20:34:50+00:00): This parking lot doesn't have any access restrictions on it. Why do you say 'access=private'? The building (and Eartha) is a tourist destination.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88404704
tux67 (2020-07-23 13:41:49+00:00): Hier musste der Wassergraben in eine Röhre unter der Zufahrt. Eine "Furt" ist das nicht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829254570
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88404922
Akkurator (2020-07-25 09:17:08+00:00): Hallo Chris,
da das als Frage formuliert war, hier der Versuch einer Antwort:
Ob designated oder nicht, entscheiden nicht die paths der Umgebung, sondern die Beschilderung. Kurzfassung: Blaues Fußgänger- oder Radfahrer-Schild ergibt designated.
Für dieses Stück gibt es kein solches Schild.
Praktische Auswirkungen hat das hier aber eh keine.

Lesestoff zur Bedeutung von "designated": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddesignated

Frühere "Diskussionen" um diesen Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74409294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74580380

Grüße,
Akkurator
4004 (2020-07-28 20:14:53+00:00): дубликаты - пожалуйста, обновите карты, или скачайте новые отсюда https://download.openstreetmap.by/
SomeoneElse (2020-07-24 18:22:08+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88405999 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-24 18:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88472449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of rather odd import changesets in the USA.  See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88405999 .
SomeoneElse (2020-07-23 17:08:00+00:00): Hello Shraddha A, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
There are a couple of problems with the changes here.  
One is that it looks like an import (you've put "source=survey" on the changeset) but it just looks like a lot of private driveways imported from somewhere else.
Another is that ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829262802 don't look like residential roads but driveways, for which the normal tagging is "highway=service; service=driveway".
Finally ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829262802 aren't joined to the adjacent roads which is clearly wrong.
Starting at the top, can you explain where the data came from?  If it's an import it'll need to follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and we'll need to make sure that the licence is compatible.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
jguthula (2020-07-24 10:21:16+00:00): Hi Andy,
Is it possible to revert the changes for the time being? There seems to be a lot of wrong edits in this changesets like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829263012/history

I have identified 23 similar errors already. Have not corrected it so far because a revert seems to be a better option over here.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
SomeoneElse (2020-07-24 15:21:16+00:00): > Is it possible to revert the changes for the time being?
It would, but (a) It should be easy to revert as it's all additions and (b) I'd normally give them a day or so to respond.
Best Regards,
Andy
Shraddha A (2020-07-24 16:10:37+00:00): Dear All,
Apologies for the mistake, this has happened while I am trying to learn how to map on OSM. I wasn’t aware that so many additions are not pushed in at once, I shall revert these asap. I will ensure such mistake is not repeated in future.
Regards,
Shraddha
SomeoneElse (2020-07-24 16:30:17+00:00): Hello Shraddha A,
Thanks for that.  You'll still need to answer the other questions, such as the source of the data and the licence.
Best Regards,
Andy
Shraddha A (2020-07-24 16:46:01+00:00): Hi Andy, 
Thanks for your understanding. 
The data was updated based on Mapbox Satellite Imagery available on JOSM.

Thank you for pointing out the challenges in my data. As advised by the community members I have reversed the changes using Reverter plugin in JOSM.

I will be extra cautious going forward on this.

Regards,
Shraddha
SomeoneElse (2020-07-24 17:15:43+00:00): (to be clear)
>  have reversed the changes using Reverter plugin in JOSM.
You haven't done this.  For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829263201/history is unchanged.
Shraddha A (2020-07-24 17:50:37+00:00): Hi Andy & SomeoneElse,

I tried to reverse the changes using Reverter plugin in OSM but it hasnt been done. Can you please assist me with the same? My Changeset ID is #88405999. 

Additionally my friend Bhavin_Sutaria also made bulk update using Changeset ID # 88405981. He also tried to reverse it using Reverter tool but we are not sure if that got reversed as well. Can you please help us reverse these changes?

Would really appreciate your help on this front. Once again Bhavin and I are sorry for the inconvenience caused to the OSM Community due to this error on our part.

Regards,
Shraddha
user_8466505 (2020-07-24 18:28:10+00:00): Hello Shraddha,
I have reverted your changeset using http://revert.osmz.ru/. It is a simple web interface that allows you to revert changesets.

Regards,
TheAdventurer64
Shraddha A (2020-07-24 20:16:28+00:00): Hi TheAdevnture64,
Thank you for reverting my Changeset.
Regards,
Shraddha
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:19:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292173329/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
chimel38 (2020-08-05 15:52:29+00:00): Bonjour, lors de votre session vous êtes intervenu pour créer semble t'il des jardins partagés de Charavines dans une relation. Cette opération a été mal maitrisée car tout un immense secteur a été impacté par ce leisure=park jusqu'à Chabons. 
Aussi le rétablissement de ces zones en  terres agricoles landuse= farmland nécessite une révision totale d périmètre couvert.
Si vous n'êtes pas en mesure de faire cette manipulation merci de me le faire savoir afin que je puisse apporter les nombreuses corrections qui s'imposent.
pio2_122 (2020-07-23 15:07:44+00:00): Ulica "Novomyśliwska" nie istnieje... Nie wspominając już o tym, że tagi adresowe należy dodawać tylko do budynków.
Askaret (2020-07-23 15:28:19+00:00): Przepraszam system dokonał mi autokorekty z W na V. Stacja ładowania znajduje się pod danym adresem ( jest umieszczona na terenie stacji paliw ) .
Frans S (2020-07-23 13:57:49+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here.
The 2 objects you mapped as buildings are irregular trees . When you zoom in very far it is obvious. 
When you select Maxar (more recent) you don't see buildings as well. I removed them.
Best regards and keep mapping
pio2_122 (2020-07-23 15:08:59+00:00): Proszę nie dublować adresów na poszczególne POI...
Askaret (2020-07-23 15:24:49+00:00): Dane POI nie jest widoczne w aplikacji OsmAnd na androida.
pio2_122 (2020-07-23 15:34:43+00:00): POI, które nie mają wpisanego adresu wyświetlają się bezproblemowo.
W OsmAnd wcale nie trzeba uzupełniać tych pól, aby dodać dane POI. I tak w aplikacji zostanie podany najbliższy adres - jest to lepsze rozwiązanie niż dublowanie adresów, gdzie adres przypisany ma tylko konkretny budynek.
Frans S (2020-07-23 14:10:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are rather accurate.Please follow the roofline and also the extensions of a building. Then a part is not covered with a roof it might be a courtyard. Don't include that in your mapping.
And square each building with the Q key 
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-23 14:23:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You missed a few ones.
Please do not include the shadow of the building into your mapping. It is outside the building.
Best regards
Myazyk (2020-07-27 15:01:28+00:00): А нащо малювати струмки там, де їх насправді нема?
Це так просто щоб гарно на карті було?
Дивився на прикладі села Рівне Дрогобицького р-ну
Hungerburg (2024-05-30 18:17:34+00:00): @Myazyk "And why draw streams where there really aren't any?" See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4271473 - Such streams can connect the Baltic and the Black Sea ;)
olehz (2020-08-10 05:51:08+00:00): навіщо наносити неіснуючі канали і струмки невідомо з яких допотопних джерел? ще й так криво?
VARVAR8 (2020-11-01 20:52:36+00:00): Джерело - ДержГеоКадастр України
VictorIE (2020-07-25 07:22:36+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

This section of road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829308928 duplicates a previously mapped section. Are you happy with the reference number and speed limit?
tux67 (2020-07-23 16:12:33+00:00): Ich nehme mal der Neubau ist im Gange:https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/wassenberg/abriss-und-neubau-der-lidl-filiale-in-wassenberg-eroeffnung-winter-2019_aid-39233509
So wie es jetzt ist, solltest du noch aus den shop=xxx ein removed:shop=xxx machen, sonst bleiben die POIs noch sichtbar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88409226
tux67 (2020-07-23 16:15:35+00:00): und .. private Pools, Gärten etc. mappen wir nicht,
Ich empfehle dringend am Anfang viel zu lesen vor der Nutzung neuer tags, etc.
z.B.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88409226
tux67 (2020-07-23 16:25:26+00:00): Ich sehe gerade der Lidl sote im Winter schon wieder öffnen. Wenn das so ist, dann ist nur das Gebäude nicht aktuell, aber der / die Läden noch an der richtigen Stelle und es reicht ein fixme an dem Gebäude a la fixme="Update Building Shape once updated aerial Images available"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88409226
tux67 (2020-07-23 16:29:20+00:00): Im September sah der Neubau schon recht weit gediehen aus:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=nGbCfi9QHMa3c8Jxbj7ikQ&focus=photo&lat=51.09093486089047&lng=6.157488842734122&z=17
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88409226
lukasj1106 (2020-07-24 09:31:01+00:00): Ich fahre am Wochenende mal an dem Supermarkt vorbei und schaue mal wie der letzte Stand ist ;D
tux67 (2020-07-25 13:12:57+00:00): Ich denke, das kannst du dir sparen (ausser du willst das Gebäude per GPS vermessen und als eins eintragen).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2101549
Ich wusste doch, daß da was war .. hatte aber vergessen, daß das in einer Note diskutiert wurde und somit ein reminder zum Neueintrag da war. 
Gruß
tux67
GinaroZ (2020-08-06 23:31:26+00:00): I've fixed your edit as you had added a turning circle node instead of a proper roundabout.
Please also be careful as the new Bing imagery is out of alignment with the current roads (which are aligned to ESRI clarity)
hvannere (2020-08-07 07:05:16+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. I have mistakenly added the turning circle in place of round about. Thanks for your corrections. Always happy to learn from the community
Frans S (2020-07-23 14:33:00+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping
You mapped 2 buildings here which you uploaded 2 times. So now we have duplicated buildings. I remove 1 set
Best regards
AkuAnakTimur (2020-09-21 16:40:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829318424 goes into a school ground. I wonder why it is mapped as a residential highway?
Frans S (2020-07-23 14:58:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request. Please square ALL rectangular buildings with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse (2021-04-04 10:36:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829322435 has not been a hotel for as long as I can remember.  The Tripadvisor reviews (which are well worth a read for giggles) suggest it was active about 10 years ago.
user_7130456 (2020-08-22 12:18:43+00:00): 你为什么要把西朝鲜湾改成黄海……
Frans S (2020-07-24 17:29:28+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your work at random. 
Good work. precise mapped.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88411323
Supaplex (2021-04-16 09:22:26+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
OlegKukharchik (2020-07-23 15:17:12+00:00): Source - multiple drivers feedback
jimkats (2020-07-24 19:48:43+00:00): That's some great level of mapping for such roads, great job (much better than tugceyildiz previously :d). This imagery works perfectly for open areas like this, but within cities the sideways images of buildings make it difficult to draw lines.
BCNorwich (2020-07-25 07:32:31+00:00): Hello Peter,
It seems that you've made quite a lot of duplicated sections of highway, please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y36qr2tj
Could you please rectify these problems?

You've also mapped a lot of highway=crossing points that I don't think exist, unverifiable, look to have no indication on the ground. If these crossing points are official then they could be tagged crossing=unmarked. To map unofficial crossing could be misleading.
There's also a lot of grass areas that extend over or to the centrelines of highways. It's not usual for grass areas to extend to highway center lines.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-08-13 19:05:27+00:00): All duplicated highway sections now removed.
BCNorwich (2020-07-23 16:45:15+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Most of the data was on the building polygon so I've consolidated all the data on building, no need for a POI with duplicate data.

Regards Bernard.
Syl (2020-08-06 08:07:33+00:00): Bonjour, le parc de Bercy est vraiment devenu un camping ?
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2020-08-06 18:54:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas à l'origine de la qualification de ce parc en camping. Cela semble effectivement étonnant, en l'absence d'infrastructure appropriée apparente.
Syl (2020-08-06 22:02:42+00:00): L'historique indique pourtant que la modification en camping à été faite dans ce groupe de modifications faites par vous.
Pouvez-vous corriger ? Merci.
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2020-08-07 16:46:02+00:00): C'est fait.
tux67 (2020-07-24 08:01:37+00:00): Hi xcep, wenn das keinen religiösen Hintergrund hat, dann ist amenity=plce_of_worship eher unpassend, oder? Ich hätte aber auch nach kurzer Suche erstmal kein Alternative als Vorschlag. Um das besser zu erläutern habe ich aber erstmal ein website=https://www.alle-doerfer-bleiben.de/ und ein fixme drangemacht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88413592