piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-04-14 03:47:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Please don’t use abbreviation for highway names. For details read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
mueschel (2021-04-19 17:47:14+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
The fuel tag you used here doesn't exist anywhere else.
Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki and use only these - only well-defined tags can be understood by other mappers and can be shown on maps and in applications.

Here's the Wiki page about common fuel tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afuel
ralley (2021-04-14 04:42:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  A few questions and issues: 1) Please use desciptive changset comments as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments  2) You have dragged node 623667975 of residential area way 49164877 into the road way 7633293  3) Way 930486806 with just a name and note field is not a valid OSM object and makes no sense as it crosses multiple roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102896166
bob3bob3 (2021-04-14 17:42:46+00:00): Was/Is the toilet in the park inop?
bob3bob3 (2021-04-14 17:50:05+00:00): Aghha.. Building:toilets vs amenity:toilets. The former doesn't show up on the user map. Wonder if mkgmap sees them..
TreeTracks (2021-04-14 21:51:57+00:00): Hi Bob, yes, I discovered that rendering problem last night too. I’ll change the entry to building=yes, amenity=toilet today, as that does display properly. The toilets were small and basic but worked fine. Best wishes Ian
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-16 15:03:55+00:00): Hello. Please have a look at the local as well as the general mapping conventions for road classifications. None of the roads that you upgraded to primary and trunk seem to meet the definitions. 

Also please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Sarangani is hundreds of kilometers away from the edits in this changeset and "Waypoint" does not describe well the huge amount of changes to well established road classifications that you made.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-15 05:27:10+00:00): Olá, adicione apenas o que existe, evite adicionar geometrias exageradas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102897630
WalkerB (2021-04-14 13:00:14+00:00): Dear Hassanpoor sb,

Is this part of an organized mapping effort?

Best,

Walker KB
stragu (2021-04-14 06:03:30+00:00): Hey Martini! Looks like we ended up editing the same new bikeway around the same time. I got a bunch of conflicts in my changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102902086 ) and it's my first time fixing that many in one go, so if you can have quick look at the what you edited to make sure I didn't mess up everything that would be much appreciated! Cheers :)
Martini097 (2021-04-14 08:36:11+00:00): ah okay, sorry about that - it should be fine :)
stragu (2021-04-14 12:16:14+00:00): Oh don't say sorry! Great to see that there's enough of us editing the map to even cause conflicts :D
See you around, thanks for checking :)
gscholz (2021-05-06 04:36:51+00:00): Hi islami_m,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-47.18689&lat=-23.10190&zoom=12&overlays=snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As youn probably know these can not be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Please have also a look at the warings in this changeset which your editor showed as you uploaded this changeset.

Kind Regards
Guido
WalkerB (2021-04-14 12:56:04+00:00): Dear Rohullah,

just like the other changesets, please stop making building overlapping buildings.  The buildings you are putting in are not visible on any imagery source and your comments don't imply a ground survey or other source of data.  Please confirm source?

Best,

Walker
user_5359 (2021-04-18 10:18:20+00:00): Hello! Please use light:count instead of light_count.
Your Village Maps (2021-04-18 19:31:23+00:00): Did you correct them or do I need to do that?
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:01:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-30 09:27:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754504931/history
你不小心刪除了土地利用住宅區，是那邊親眼看過後變更用途了嗎?如果只是單純標錯就改正確類就好
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102899299
stephankn (2021-06-26 08:30:22+00:00): way 930501167 is certainly no primary highway. I changed it to residential. Please be careful about tagging
sujatha_1 (2021-07-02 13:19:02+00:00): Hi stephankn,

Trust your are doing well.
Appreciated for the correction done and apology for accidental tagging
Thanks for giving suggestion 

Regards,
Sujatha
Kha_nam (2021-04-15 06:47:16+00:00): Hi DILG Bais
changed the classification from primary to trunk way 282580079,way 904023441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102970410
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102900515
mariotomo (2021-04-14 15:24:12+00:00): Hola Luis Locano y gracias por revisar tus contribuciones. se ve mucho mejor!
si tienes acceso al área, si puedes revisar los nombres (en particular útil para los amenity=fuel), y el tipo de tiendas (que ahora están en shop=yes), o si siguen existiendo los edificios (en particular el edificio comercial 727542060).
si quieres apoyo de la comunidad de maperos, acuérdate que existe el https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61 y a mi me encuentras en el grupo Telegram https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
mariotomo (2021-10-14 21:31:26+00:00): »espero estén bien hechas«
en realidad, no tanto, esperaba verte en el foro o en el grupo y pues después de 6 meses será que te cuento aquí.  en particular fíjate en el nodo 7924834424, la tercera gasolinera.  el nodo está bien, pero además de este nodo pusiste la misma información, para la misma gasolinera, también en una relación con dos miembros, y estos dos miembros sólo participan de esta relación.  (1) el error consiste en repetir información: en la base de datos por a tu contribución tenemos dos gasolineras cuando en la realidad solo hay una. (2) está mal —sin llegar a ser un error— crear un multipolígono en una situación tan sencilla.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-16 04:14:16+00:00): Aloha!  Thanks for adding this nicely-traced river area near K-Bay.  Join me friend, in switching over to natural=water + water=river, which has emerged as the US consensus for tagging river areas.  Also, feel free to join us in the OpenStreetMap US Slack, at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ , channel #local-hawaii

For more details on river tagging, see the river modernization project here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernization

Mahalo!
empers (2021-04-16 10:46:52+00:00): I suggest on the contrary — do not switch. But if you're gonna, do the whole river at once.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-16 14:24:14+00:00): Hi @empers, this issue was discussed extensively within the US community, which is why waterway=riverbank is no longer in use in the United States.
empers (2021-04-16 14:28:42+00:00): That's okay @ZeLonewolf. I was making an honest suggestion, however, I was uninformed about the US situation.

Looking at taginfo, I can see that the US completely cancelled the tag, you can even see the border of the country.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=riverbank#map
salvoconducto (2021-10-20 12:46:49+00:00): @ZeLonewolf: Are you respecting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-20 13:28:35+00:00): Oh look, the latest sock puppet.

Yes.
Tom_Holland (2021-11-29 20:09:50+00:00): I was not aware that this "decision" had been made, and I have not been able  to find where this has been "discussed extensively within the US community", but I will keep it in mind for the future.

Can you point to some of these discussions?  The wiki does not back up your position on this...
ZeLonewolf (2022-03-27 10:10:24+00:00): See list of discussions here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization#References
eggie (2021-04-14 06:53:22+00:00): Beste Rob.. Dit is helaas niet correct. In OSM zijn er al adresnodes. Svp niet dubbel adressen taggen op de gebouwomtrek. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-14 11:18:37+00:00): Dubbel adres verwijderd.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-14 06:54:43+00:00): Het beste om alle verkeer met wielen te weren is vehicle=no
MVG
eggie
woodpeck (2021-04-14 08:14:45+00:00): Mateusz, I think the local mappers have this situation under control and it is not helpful at all if mappers from far away add fuel to the fire.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-14 14:24:08+00:00): OK, if deliberately incorrect access=private was applied with approval from a local community I am not going to revert that
Rakkka (2021-04-19 08:44:27+00:00): 丁目の数字をアラビア数字から漢数字に変更された理由をお教えください。
okadatsuneo (2021-04-19 11:24:05+00:00): 地理院地図や街中の街区表示板など、丁目は基本的には漢数字となっています。またnyampireさんが進めている住所情報のインポート(下記URJ参照)でも、丁目は漢数字に統一しようとしています。
ご理解下さい。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:MLIT_ISJ/import2019_outline
Rakkka (2021-04-20 09:36:11+00:00): 　私としては頑としてアラビア数字にしたいわけではなく、漢数字に正当性があればそれで統一するつもりですが、正当性といえる程の理由はないようです。

　ネットの地図ではゼンリンの地図・Googleマップ・Yahoo!地図・MapFan、紙の地図ではゼンリン住宅地図・マップルはアラビア数字です。今回調べた範囲ではすべてアラビア数字でした。
　街中の街区表示板は漢数字が多いですが、アラビア数字が使われているものも天王寺にあります。

> nyampireさんが進めている住所情報のインポート(下記URJ参照)
　元は国土交通省の規格のようで、地理院地図のことを考えると、国土交通省は漢数字で統一しているのかもしれません。これは考慮に値することだと思います。
　ただし住民票はアラビア数字で、行政全体で漢数字に統一されているわけではありません。

　どちらが広く使われているか、とは別に重要なのが利便性です。
　アラビア数字はデータとして扱いやすくIT社会向きで、外国人にもわかりやすいです。ネットや市販の地図がアラビア数字なのは、それが理由だと思われます。
　国土交通省や街中の街区表示板などが漢数字なのは、アナログ時代の古い慣習でそうなっている可能性があります。OpenStreetMapがデジタルであることを考えると、それに従うのは疑問の余地があります。

　とはいえこれは元号を廃止して西暦に統一するかどうかに似た話で、ここでいくら議論しても人々から広い同意が得られなければ決められない事柄だと思います。
　なので無理にアラビア数字にはとは言いませんが、漢数字が正しいといえるものではないということはお伝えしておきたいと思います。
Becky Candy (2021-04-14 08:12:37+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102905636
Becky Candy (2021-04-14 08:22:03+00:00): Please remember to square  the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102905714
Becky Candy (2021-04-14 08:22:04+00:00): Please remember to square  the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102905714
Osmwithspace (2021-06-05 17:57:09+00:00): Hi  Tiziano_Bz,
are you sure that the way you have drawn it in is correct? I was there last summer and in my memory it was clearly different. It seems to me that you have done this on the basis of the old satellite image.
greetings
Osmwithspace
Osmwithspace (2021-06-05 18:02:30+00:00): Look at this Mapillary image:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=46.538830897227534&lng=11.458149092543021&z=17&pKey=s5AYTWD3H5yEdVEH87eqcw&focus=photo

Looks like there was a big remodel there in 2019. The satellite image you used is from 2014/2015.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-04-14 07:38:19+00:00): Hi, layer=-1 on that church seems incorrect. You can connect the path to the building with an entrance tag instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102906270
Rob Roy (2021-04-14 08:32:04+00:00): Thanks. Fixed
woodpeck (2021-04-17 23:51:22+00:00): Could you provide a link to a photo that documents the signposted spelling?
user_9850906 (2021-04-18 00:08:02+00:00): This particular suburb doesn't have a lot of signposting for "Omiha" (because it's also known as "Rocky Bay"), but you can see a couple of examples at
https://www.google.com/maps/@-36.8188843,175.058973,3a,37.5y,198.71h,97.01t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgld6r_x4UTAEmPp_DBuR8g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
and
https://www.google.com/maps/@-36.8186784,175.059367,3a,37.5y,218.5h,93.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJs6ZCkGHJ-kwjoDHXXGhAQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

(FYI, with just a handful of exceptions, signposting of New Zealand towns usually uses the English alphabet, without macrons that sometimes appear in the 'official' name)
WalkerB (2021-04-14 12:51:04+00:00): Dear Rohullah,

Thanks for contributing to the map in Afghanistan.  I see you're putting in a lot of Buildings overlapping buildings.  This topological issue reduces the usability of OSM, and is incorrect. 

Here are some materials on the digitization of buildings: https://learnosm.org/fa/coordination/remote-tracing/

I'm happy to hold a mapathon and work with you and your friends and colleagues on this.

Best,

Walker
s8evq (2021-04-14 07:48:21+00:00): Dag Kevin,
Ik ben niet zeker als dat klopt hoor. Ik ben daar maandag nog gepasseerd en aan de zuidelijke kant van het traject staat in ieder geval geen bord dat het verboden is voor voetgangers. Wat is de bron ?
Kevin@RouteYou (2021-04-14 07:57:41+00:00): Kwam van één van de natuurpunt beheerders. Ik heb het alvast nog even nagevraagd. Ik had ook even het toegankelijkheidsplan gecontroleerd en vond het pad daar ook niet op: https://www.natuurenbos.be/sites/default/files/inserted-files/maldegem_-_maldegemveld.pdf
Kevin@RouteYou (2021-04-15 17:52:43+00:00): Is me nog eens bevestigd door de natuurpuntbeheerder. Dit stukje zou moeten ontoegankelijk zijn voor alle modi. Ik geef alvast jouw opmerking ook mee aan hen dat op terrein weinig zichtbaar van is van een verbod.
s8evq (2021-04-15 19:17:54+00:00): OK, bedankt om het na te kijken. Ik zal er nog eens extra op letten als ik er passeer.
Kevin@RouteYou (2021-04-16 07:38:29+00:00): Ter info, kreeg ik nog mee van de beheerder: "wandelaars en mtb-ers hebben dit stuk pad zelf gecreëerd hebben en blijven dit hardnekkig openhouden, ondanks dat het off-limit is. Obstakels aanbrengen om aan te tonen dat het geen pad is en dus niet kan gebruikt worden, worden gewoon weggenomen."
riysingh (2021-04-14 07:04:35+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 102907868 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
riysingh.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-14 09:03:05+00:00): Can you explain why have you deleted the woodland?
Kovoschiz (2021-04-14 09:04:14+00:00): Not to mention the reservoir area
boldvision (2021-04-14 14:25:59+00:00): There has no woodland, it's just slopes with few trees
G_P_J (2021-04-18 19:38:12+00:00): Skoro już zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy, to wypadałoby poprawić również wszystkie adresy przypisane do tej ulicy :)
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-19 06:30:19+00:00): OK, zmienie adresy. Dziękuje za przypomnienie :)
ralley (2021-04-14 19:46:32+00:00): Imports must use a dedicated user account as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102910208
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-08 16:34:22+00:00): با سلام
در ثبت اسم خیابان‌ها، ملاک تابلوهای شهرداریست، نام محلی به صورت loc name ثبت می‌شود. ضمن اینکه حق شهدا نیست که حداقل اسم‌شون کامل نوشته بشه؟
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-08 16:40:19+00:00): در مورد خیابان شهید بهزادبخت هم همین طور. لطفا اجازه بدید نام شهدا کامل باشه. اینجا یک دیتابیسه و متعلق به نشان، اسنپ یا برنامه‌های دیگه نیست. جهت شخصی سازی اَپ‌ها از روش‌هایی استفاده می‌شه که فقط روی اون جی‌پی‌اس اعمال بشن. مثلا: سرعتگیرها که مختص خود نشان هست. البته اونهایی که روی osm اردبیل مشاهده میکنید رو بنده روی دیتا بیس اضافه کردم.
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-11-09 17:09:37+00:00): جناب چهره برقی
ادیت های ما براساس قوانین او اس ام انجام میشه. اینکه جایی اسم کوتاه شده و اسم کامل در تگهای دیگه اومده نه بر اساس دیتابیس ماست نه هیچ جای دیگه ای و طبق قوانین و دستور العمل های او اس ام است
این موارد قبلا هم در گروه تخصصی بررسی شده و نتیجه گیری شده.ممنون از توجهتون
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-13 14:52:04+00:00): سلام مجدد، ضمن خسته نباشید
البته بنده خیلی وقته به گروه سر نزدم، اما یه سری در این مورد بحث شد و در نهایت بچه‌ها گفتن ملاک، در osm ایران بر اساس پلاک شهرداری باشه.
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-13 14:59:14+00:00): البته از شما خواهشی دارم
برای بعضی اسامی که برای نسل جدید، ناآشناست، توضیحاتی هم درج می‌کنم. لطفا اونا رو پاک نکنید. اکثرشون رو به مرور زمان و بر اساس پرس و جو از خانواده خود شهیدان، هم ولایتی ها و هم محله ای ها جمع آوری کردم.
gscholz (2021-04-17 06:52:48+00:00): Hi islami_m,
your recent edits have added a significant amount of errors to the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-47.19247&lat=-23.08469&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you probably know, not connected ways can not be used by routing software, so can you please fix this and may be think about how to avoid this error in the future? As you can see in the  log protocol of this changeset your editor ID has shown you warnings which you obviously ignored.

Kind Regards
Guido
Jrachi (2021-04-14 09:28:42+00:00): Sull'edificio hai messo nel name Vamlaggia anziché Valmaggia
fjavier_gr (2023-05-31 18:46:20+00:00): Esa vía no tiene sentido que sea de enlace de la carretera "secondary", es una vía de acceso solo para llegar al restaurante.
kapazao (2023-06-01 10:51:49+00:00): Pues sí, no sé por qué la puse así entonces. Gracias por la corrección.
trigpoint (2021-04-17 11:19:31+00:00): The 60 mph limit does not extend to the roundabout. There is a 40 mph zone which I have added.
flohoff (2021-04-14 12:59:27+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gerade gesehen das du die Adresse vom Gebäude auf den school outline gemoved hast.

Wenn hab ich sowas immer dupliziert. Eigentlich hat ja das Gebäude die Adresse und zufällig ist in dem Gebäude eine Schule die halt dann auch die Adresse hat. Und dann gibts die Fläche einer Schule als POI - Ist halt alles so ein bisschen murks. Ne schöne Lösung hab ich nicht aber ich lasse es immer auf beidem.

Flo
Becky Candy (2021-04-14 09:08:20+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102913205
Carto'Cité (2022-01-07 13:49:49+00:00): Bonjour AirXLR,
J'ai remis ce chemin que tu avais supprimé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917878330. Je me suis dit qu'il s'agissait probablement d'une erreur mais n'hésite pas à me dire si la situation par rapport à la photo aérienne de l'IGN. J'ai aussi modifié la description des chemins pour mieux correspondre aux pratiques. Je pense que tu suis les invitations de iD à renseigner plein de chose qui au final rendent les données mal interprétables et ambiguë à un moment ; c'est assez courant et je comprends bien. Je reste à ta disposition si tu avais la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
AirXLR (2022-01-19 14:26:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour cette correction!!!
Car si c'est moi qu'il l'ai supprimé, c'est bien une erreur.
La prochaine fois que je m'y met, je  vais faire attention à ne pas surcharger les renseignements.
Pendant le confinement, j'avais un peu de temps et j'ai voulu trop bien faire dans mon secteur.

Par contre, j'aurais bien aimé travailler sur les lignes de bus la prochaine fois.
Si vous avez quelques minutes à me consacrer pour m'expliquer comment faire avec peu d'outils et sans le temps de suivre tous les itinéraires, je serais vraiment reconnaissant.

A bientôt Charles!!
Carto'Cité (2022-01-20 08:54:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ton retour :)
Les lignes de bus sont un des sujet les plus compliqué donc pourquoi pas t'aider un peu. Peux-tu me contacter sur mon compte perso https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mygeomatic pour que nous échangions nos coordonnées. Il va falloir que tu commences à utiliser JOSM aussi car avec iD c'est pratiquement impossible.
À très bientôt.
eggie (2021-04-14 11:11:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-14 11:13:36+00:00): Ruben ,.. Weet je ook hoe de busroutes lopen. Die ontbreken nu nog.
Overigens heb je editor JOSM nodig om die correct te bewerken.

MVG
eggie
blackboxlogic (2021-04-15 14:42:40+00:00): Hi! I've been reviewing many of your edits and they looks great. For this one, pay attention that addr:street doesn't abbreviate the suffix. I've fixed "High St" to "High Street". Also, no need to leave that single node with only a tourism=hotel tag, since the encompassing building has that information and more.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102914368
pabi12 (2021-04-16 04:01:34+00:00): Hello blackboxlogic,I got your message. Thank you for your concern, I will correct these types of mistakes  from now on.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-05-28 06:53:42+00:00): Hallo Jenseman79,

hier hast Du einen Zaun eingezeichnet, der mittig auf dem vorhanden Waldweg verläuft. Das ist vermutlich nicht gewollt. Deiner Beschreibung nach ist der Weg an seinen beiden Enden durch einen quer verlaufenden Zaun gesperrt, richtig? Ist der Weg selber noch vorhanden/erkennbar? Gibt es Tore im Zaun?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Jenseman79 (2021-05-28 12:09:50+00:00): Moin, das mit dem Zaun ist leider genau richtig! 
Ich stand davor 🤷‍♂️
In diesem Bereich sind junge Bäume und zum Schutz derer wohl der Zaun! 
In dem Zaun sind auch keine Türen um den Weg zu befahren 
Gruß der Jenseman
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-06-10 06:54:20+00:00): Moin Jenseman,
danke für die schnelle Antwort. Schön, dass Du das Projekt unterstützt! Das Projekt basiert auf der Arbeit von Menschen vor Ort.

Weißt Du wo der Zaun entlang läuft? Dann könntest Du den Zaun als Linie einzeichnen. Weißt Du welcher Abschnitt von dem Weg betroffen ist? Die gesamte Linie (Nord-Süd)? Dann müsste man die Linie teilen und beim betroffenen Stück "Erlaubter Zugang" - "Alle" = no eintragen.

Möchtest Du es selbst probieren?
Jenseman79 (2021-06-10 14:44:05+00:00): Moin, 
Ich schau mir das mal am Laptop an! 
Falls ich es nicht hin bekomme melde ich mich! 

Gruß der Jenseman
Jenseman79 (2021-06-11 16:03:57+00:00): Moin, habe die Änderung jetzt noch einmal neu gemacht und den Bereich wo der Zaun verläuft komplett eingerahmt. Plus eine kurze Beschreibung

Gruß der 
Jenseman
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-06-11 19:09:31+00:00): Danke für Deine Mühen! :-)

Ich habe noch folgende Anpassungen gemacht:

- Ich habe unnötige Verbindungen (gemeinsame Punkte) vom Zaun mit der Landnutzungsfläche "Wald" gelöscht. Solche Verbindungen sollte man meistens vermeiden, da sie das spätere Bearbeiten erschweren.

- Ich habe den "Zaun" aus Deiner ersten Bearbeitung gelöscht. Das war eine Linie die direkt auf der Weglinie lag. Das sieht man so auch nicht im Online-Editor.

- Ich habe das Wegstück, dass innerhalb der Umzäunung liegt als aufgegeben Weg gekennzeichnet (abandoned:highway=path). So wird auch kein Router/Navi diesen Weg mehr vorschlagen. Das der Weg durch ein Zaun verläuft können wohl keine Route/Navis erkennen.

So, das war jetzt schon etwas aufwändiger. Es gibt aber auch einfache Dinge bei OSM. :-)

Hier noch ein Youtube Video zum Einstieg mit dem Online-Editor "iD": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UFf0UOSlJY

Es würde mich freuen, wenn Dich dieser spezielle Fall nicht abgeschreckt hat und Du Lust hast noch mehr zur freien "Weltkarte" beizutragen.