piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2017-07-09 15:44:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
hfst (2018-02-27 20:09:11+00:00): was bedeutet der tag "highway_1=cycleway"?
chillly (2017-05-15 13:56:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Is the path you have entered a permanent route or a temporary one for an event?
Chris Skerratt (2017-05-15 14:11:20+00:00): Its a Permanent Trail one, more sections will open up over the summer as they are built
chillly (2017-05-15 14:16:04+00:00): Very good, thanks
corfede (2017-05-18 21:18:53+00:00): Ottimo ;)
xmd5a (2017-05-20 19:42:20+00:00): Добрый день. Можно поинтересоваться - каков источник адресных данных?
literan (2017-05-16 12:02:54+00:00): а по этому кругу (как и по двум другим рядом с Комсити) можно в любом направлении ездить (т.е. это не круговое движение)?
elazarev (2017-05-16 12:39:58+00:00): Гм, давно там не ходил, но по-моему это обычное круговое движение, если правильно помню знак был соответствующий
literan (2017-05-22 14:55:19+00:00): поправил все три круговых
elazarev (2017-05-22 15:06:59+00:00): Спасибо!
literan (2017-05-16 11:16:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не надо вносить в OSM фейковые названия. Единственное упоминание "Парка Осипа Бове" в гугле - статья в вики за вашим же авторством https://www.google.ru/search?q=%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA+%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0+%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=Kd8aWfv3Eoqg6ATl5YbwBQ Откатываю вашу правку (тем более, что вы зачем-то удалили контуры снесенных зданий с соответствующими тегами, что, вообще-то говоря, совсем нехорошо - придет новичок и по Бингу нарисует их заново, т.к. они там видны)
eggie (2017-05-15 16:56:12+00:00): Dit is een lastige. Volgens mij is dat pad dan gewoon de spoorlijn. 'k Vind het wel een vraag voor het forum hoe je dit het beste op kan lossen. Nu lopen er steeds twee ways over elkaar heen.
eggie (2017-05-15 16:57:07+00:00): Er zijn meer voorbeelden van fietspaden die vroeger spoorlijn waren. Belzenlijntje.
eggie (2017-05-15 17:00:16+00:00): Hier bij Vaassen https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.29626/5.97890
highway=cycleway
railway=razed
Bernhard W (2017-07-08 13:29:38+00:00): I do not believe that Fernkloof Drive changed to a cycleway, i. e. motor_vehicle = no and foot = no. 
Please check!
elgolfo (2020-05-17 20:52:07+00:00): Hi gfzbv,

die Hydranten die du mit diesem Changeset eingetragen hast: sind das alles Löschwasserbrunnen, Oberflur- oder Unterflurhydranten?

Ich würde sie gern an das aktuelle Tagging-Schema anpassen (fire_hydrant:pond gibt es nicht).

Viele Grüße
Moritz
gfzbv (2020-05-19 06:03:27+00:00): Moin! 
Es sind alles Löschwasserbrunnen (Entnahme aus Grundwasser) mit Sauganschluss (Storz A).
Grüße
Kai
elgolfo (2020-05-19 08:56:39+00:00): Moin Kai,

habe die Brunnen angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85428267

Jetzt sollten sie auch korrekt auf der Openfiremap dargestellt werden.

Grüße
Moritz
chillly (2017-05-15 14:03:27+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged the Walesbymoor Trail as a track. That means it is wide enough for a four-wheeled vehicle, yet you have tagged the width as 0.5m. I suggest you want to use highway=path instead. The extra (useful) tags makes it clear what to expect. 
You haven't added any access tags. Is it a public trail, private, temporary? Is there a fee to use it?
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
DannyAiquipa (2017-05-15 17:16:58+00:00): Hi Dael, thanks for ypur contributtion in OSM, I have noticed that you added some wrong objects , please see this https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/getting-started/
I have reverted the changeset
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
mueschel (2017-05-16 10:36:55+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
luschi (2017-05-16 17:46:09+00:00): Hallo ax3l,     
bitte verwende StreetComplete mit Vorsicht, da die hier von dir erfassten Öffnungszeiten fehlerhaft sind. Die App überträgt anscheinend Daten ohne sie vorher zu überprüfen.    
StreetComplete ist noch in einem frühen Betastadium und Änderungen sollten nach dem Upload noch einmal geprüft werden.     
     
lg     
     
PS: Habe die Öffnungszeiten vom Golmarket korrigiert.
ax3l (2017-05-16 18:52:30+00:00): Hallo luschi,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Oh nein, das Öffnungszeitenformat sollte seit 0.10 (was ich verwende) ok sein!

Ich werde das mal auf
  https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/108

melden!

lg
ax3l (2017-05-16 19:01:34+00:00): Auf den ersten Blick sieht mir mein und dein Eintrag semantisch identisch in der Bedeutung aus, was einer auswertenden Applikation auch ziemlich egal im Endergebnis ist. Meine Eintragung ist additiv (,), deine ist mit zwei unabhängigen Regeln (;) - aber den String ästhetisch anzupassen ist eine Optimierung für den Renderer in diesem Fall und kein Falscheintrag.

lg
luschi (2017-05-16 19:41:56+00:00): Beide Einträge sind richtig und werden korrekt ausgewertet.  
Ich bin der Meinung, dass Öffnungszeiten hier auf OSM so einfach wie möglich erfasst werden sollten.      
Man kommt mit einem übersichtlichen Einträgen besser zurecht und kann geänderte Öffnungszeiten besser aktualisieren ohne Fehler zu verursachen. 
Öffnungszeiten von Geschäften werden auch auf Broschüren und Webseiten mit:      Mo-Fr 07:30-12:00 - 15:30-19:00     
Sa 07:30-12:00      
angegeben und nicht mit: 
Mo-Sa Vormittag 07:30-12:00      
Mo-Fr Nachmittag 15:30-19:00          
     
lg
ax3l (2017-05-16 20:06:55+00:00): Hi luschi,

das verstehe ich schon, aber OSM ist eine Datenbank und keine Broschüre. Gerade bei Öffnungszeiten filtert man eh mit Queries (gerade offen; offen am Tag XY um Zeit t; o.ä.). Wie ein UI dann die Öffnungszeiten wirklich sortiert, filtert, darstellt ist vermutlich eh regional unterschiedlich, das will ich gar nicht bewerten und kann natürlich umgeformt werden. Denke z.B. allein schon an die "Beginnt eine Woche am Montag oder Sonntag" Unterschiede. Das Gute ist, der Datensatz dahinter ist neutral.
Die Änderung kann man machen, ist aber wirklich nicht "besser oder schlechter", ich habe die zwei Einträge tatsächlich auch so manuell in 2 statt 3 Zeilen ausgedrückt weil ich Dinge lieber prägnant mathematisch ausdrücke.

lg
iwhs (2017-11-04 15:40:46+00:00): I was in Arreton today and the driveway to the vicarage runs east-west from a point north of the pub car park. Also I think it's the 'Old Vicarage'. The track you drew is only a pedestrian path that goes through a gate to the school. The bottom bit of the Garden around the vicarage is school land and also used for overflow parking.
user_4081914 (2017-11-04 16:10:15+00:00): In Holland at moment. Can you correct that
iwhs (2017-11-05 09:57:29+00:00): Done
user_5359 (2017-05-15 17:46:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path.
emergency99 (2017-05-15 17:37:46+00:00): Also ein pasr sachen waren schon falsch gesetzt. Der Bus der am Satellitenbild zu sehen ist (anderes Changeset) ist keine platform und heißt schon gar nicht bus (ich habe die Buslinien in Vösendorf schon gemappt, da fehlt nix. Die Platform ist als Node eh schon erfasst).

Spielplätze brauchen keinen Namen. Da reicht leisure = playground. Und der Pfarrhof war zu groß eingezeichnet (wenn es da um die Buildings ging.)
Auch mappt man auf Spielplätzen nicht jede Schaukel oder rutsch einzeln sls Spielplatz (das ist falsch)

Bitte lese dir zum Korrekten mappen die OSM-Wiki durch, und unterlasse das" für den Render" (unnötige namen) und Pokemon (falsche playground nodes) mappen.
Danke
samely (2017-05-15 16:16:14+00:00): Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found many parks you added, however those don't match with the satellite imagery. Would you mind to check out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark and you can ping me if need any help.
Noen (2017-06-03 13:34:45+00:00): Hei!
Hvorfor endre fotgjengerovergangene her fra "crossing=traffic_signals" til "crossing=zebra"? Da fjerner du informasjon om fotgjengerovergangene er lysregulert.
dvdhoven (2017-05-16 05:36:04+00:00): Hallo Fred,

Ik heb aan Schapendreef en Dennenlaan oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd.
Nu staat 22-34 niet meer als onderbroken in het overzicht van VMarc

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SammysHP (2017-05-15 17:45:50+00:00): Hallo struck7,
 
jetzt hast du einen zweiten Picknickplatz erstellt. ;) Ich habe den alten mal gelöscht und die Note geschlossen.
 
Viele Grüße
Sven
struck7 (2017-05-16 15:18:22+00:00): Hallo Sven,

vielen Dank!
Ich übe noch...

bis dann
Herbert Struck
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
naoliv (2017-11-01 12:48:47+00:00): Erick, esse nó https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3982007659 anteriormente estava marcado como sendo um radar, mas você retirou essa tag (mantendo apenas a velocidade máxima nele)
Talvez foi sem querer ou o radar não existe mais?
Erick Araujo (2017-11-01 13:47:18+00:00): Não existe radar nessa ponte, naoliv. :)
Alexander-II (2018-05-14 20:15:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы, очевидно, поэкспериментировали с цветами крыш. Правку я откатываю, на осенних (2017 года) снимках со спутника крыша равномерно зеленая.
Gnork (2018-05-15 08:21:41+00:00): Да. Проверял работу и забыл вернуть в исходное состояние. Спасибо за внимательность.
chillly (2017-05-15 15:06:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM
The carpark node you added duplicates the area already there. You added the name 'test' so It won't matter to you that I'm going to remove it.

I hope you add some real stuff in the future.
highflyer74 (2017-05-19 09:42:22+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier muß ich doch einmal nachfragen: der Parkplatz selbst verfügt über behindertengerechte Toiletten...? Oder ist hier vielleicht ein Fehler unterlaufen?

Melde Dich bitte kurz, damit gemeinsam eine Lösung herbeiführen können. Danke!
chillly (2017-05-15 15:11:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM
The road you added doesn't join up to anything, so routing to the road won't work. I suggest you join it to a point in Thomas Street if that is how it is accessed.

If it supports residential properties then I would change the tag to highway=residental. Does the road have a name? If not it might be a service road for a property, in which case highway=service might be better. I hope this helps, feel free to ask questions.
Dominik Picheta (2017-05-15 15:20:03+00:00): Done http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48704526#map=15/54.4195/-6.4427
Dominik Picheta (2017-05-15 15:58:03+00:00): Thanks for accepting!

btw pointers on how to make "Flat 1, Mourneview House" (through to "Flat 29, Mourneview House") and "1 Mourneview House" (through to "29 Mourneview House") searchable would be appreciated.
chillly (2017-05-15 16:30:32+00:00): I didn't accept your work - in OSM we try to use everything. :-)

You can add a point for each address and add addressing for each one. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses for more info.
MCDA (2017-05-15 17:49:21+00:00): Amazingly that is not surprising, as Google Maps is very wrong in a lot of areas!

I have traced the building more accurately from Bing and added some local features.
Dominik Picheta (2017-05-15 17:57:28+00:00): Nice! Beautiful job :)
Thanks for the links chillly!
Polarbear (2019-07-14 21:15:49+00:00): Hallo whellmut, 
welche Erlaubnis liegt dir vor, aus einem Reiseführer Daten zu kopieren?
bgirardot (2018-03-27 01:22:36+00:00): One building, nice.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-31 12:15:18+00:00): Bonjour, natural=tree est naturellement un arbre et il ne s'appelle pas "arbre" - "name=arbre" est donc erroné. J'ai corrigé: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49134105
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-31 12:18:15+00:00): Bonjour, "building=BATI" n'a pas de sens dans Openstreetmap. Un bâtiment s'étiquette "building=yes" - bâtiment au singulier vu qu'Openstreetmap cartographie les bâtiments individuels et non la notion zonale de "bâti". J'ai corrigé: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49134183
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-31 12:18:29+00:00): N'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des questions !
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-31 12:19:07+00:00): Si tu souhaites indiquer plus de détails concernant les arbres, tu peux regarder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Øukasz (2017-09-13 21:24:08+00:00): created duplicate
alan_gr (2017-05-15 15:42:52+00:00): Comment should be "fixed street names based on survey"
zstadler (2017-11-13 12:12:42+00:00): Hi דוד-צבי,
Here are also several self-intersecting ways.
See them at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.16770&lat=31.99577&zoom=13&opacity=0.67&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
.
Please use multi-polygons to map areas with "holes", and use "inner" and "outer" roles.
zstadler (2021-07-11 21:28:41+00:00): The issue was resolved
Nedfro (2017-05-15 15:36:49+00:00): NOT Missing addresses
datendelphin (2017-05-15 18:01:49+00:00): Indeed. But on a related note. Tagging highways in Switzerland with asphalt is a thing now? I mean, they even got rid of the old concrete ones. Don't get me wrong, no harm done. Just amusing :)
muralito (2019-04-29 00:44:14+00:00): Hola. el fixme de alinear al Rio Negro creo que no corresponde, porque creo que los limites se establecieron y se demarcaron y luego el rio cambio algo su curso.
smaprs (2019-04-29 02:10:45+00:00): Oi Muralito, não sei de qual trecho falas. Não me lembro. Mas em geral quando eu colocava isto deve ter sido apenas para lembrar de melhorar traçado com imagem
literan (2017-05-16 11:47:06+00:00): Здравствуйте! не ставьте, пожалуйста, теги foot=yes, motorcar=no и т.п. на дорогах. Почему - можно прочитать у меня в профиле.
MiloWernars (2017-05-16 07:06:46+00:00): bedankt, ik zal kijkenof ik het nog iets beter kan maken deze week maar elke keer als ik daar langs ga en thuis kom ben ik de helft weer vergeten
ligfietser (2017-05-16 08:26:18+00:00): Daarom zet ik de beelden ook op Mapillary :)
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jYUQV--tYjt_iCqUGKIB0Q
mot_tom (2018-04-13 16:07:19+00:00): Hi Dalesman, I noticed that in this changeset, some of the tagging was slightly incorrect, as by adding a highway=path tag to an area (such as the nature reserve), OSM interprets that as meaning that the path as an area, so the whole of the nature reserve was rendered in a similar colour to a town square! I've fixed this error in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57912073#map=14/53.5900/0.1187) and I assumed that you meant to create a path that runs around the perimeter of the nature reserve. Is this correct or have I misunderstood? All the best, mot_tom
samely (2017-05-16 16:04:25+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM! I noticed you added names to the building you traced, can you please confirm if it's correct? otherwise deleted.

Regards, 
Eliane
Cascafico (2017-05-16 08:57:06+00:00): Grazie per il contributo e.. .benvenuto in OSM!

Se sei della zona, potresti controllare/correggere l'altro civico 151 che sta 30 metri più ad est?
cadsauxk (2017-06-25 00:27:10+00:00): Olá Colega! Bom saber que tem gente da região mapeando.

Só um comentário importante: nas estradas de terra inclua surface=unpaved, pois na falta desta informação é assumido que se trata de via pavimentada.

abraço
Luis36995 (2017-05-23 18:52:42+00:00): Hi JMig@, Thanks for collaborating with OpenStreetMap, the data I add is not recorded on satellite images, how do I conclude that these objects exist?
Luis36995 (2017-05-23 18:52:33+00:00): Hi JMig@, Thanks for collaborating with OpenStreetMap, the data I add is not recorded on satellite images, how do I conclude that these objects exist?
PT-53 (2017-05-15 18:25:59+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
in Baden-Württemberg steht uns für OSM die amtliche Karte Maps4BW (Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW). Damit können Waldwege - nach Überprüfung vor Ort ! - lagegenauer eingezeichnet werden. Maps4BW kann im Editor JOSM als Hintergrund eingeblendet werden. Du müßtest dazu nur auf JOSM umsteigen. Schaus Dir mal an.
Grüße aus Oberschwaben (BW)
dcapillae_old (2017-05-15 17:42:00+00:00): Hi, Rodrigo! An alpine hut here? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut Maybe is a mistake, isn't?
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-16 05:21:13+00:00): Some of your added footways in this changeset cut through buildings. Like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493733599#map=18/32.11247/34.79590
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-16 05:23:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493733595#map=18/32.11552/34.79693
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-16 05:18:00+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM,
1. It seems you added a footway on a road (אושה). 
2. Do the paths in the park all overlap in the center? If so, they need to have a shared node.
happychang (2017-05-20 14:19:30+00:00): 工業區也是都市計畫的區域, 也要移除嗎? 我加商業區只是讓人一眼就可以看出逛街買東西要到哪.
chillly (2017-05-16 14:46:30+00:00): Hi,
Is the area you marked a garden or is it allotments. I see you've tagged it as a garden but your comment indicates it to be an allotment area. Is it an extension to the existing allotments?
Cheers
David Beaver (2017-05-16 17:44:18+00:00): Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
It's a community garden on the council allotment site.
chillly (2017-05-16 17:45:30+00:00): No problem, that helps, thanks.
Pikse (2019-09-18 15:20:19+00:00): Border stone in this location can't mark the contemporary border. It's probably a removed marker or otherwise a historical one. Also, based on what you draw the rest of the border around that marker? You can check the actual border from [1]. This border segment should be restored and disconnected from this border stone.

[1] https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/link/SOPPECNc
Jay May (2019-09-18 16:12:08+00:00): When I drew that I went there by car two years ago, so I can hardly answer all your questions. Nevertheless, it was a black/white border marker "Latvija/Eesti". To prove I'm right I would have to come back there by car and make Mapillary geolocalization. It won't be for right now as I usually travel between the Baltics by bus, with big groups.
Pikse (2019-09-18 16:47:23+00:00): I'm not arguing whether border marker exists in that location. I just don't see a reason to think that it marks contemporary border in that location. Now that I look closer to it on aerial imagery – in someone's garden between a greenhouse and a shed – it may very well be a joke by local residents.
Cyclono (2017-05-15 23:31:36+00:00): Nice! I wanted to add it earlier but wasn't sure if it should be kept secret :)
Spanholz (2017-08-30 12:09:04+00:00): Hello Michal,

could you please connect the footways you added to the streets. Else they are quite useless as they can't be used for routing.
michalfabik (2017-08-30 12:12:56+00:00): Hi, sure, I hope I'll get around to do it tomorrow.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-05-25 14:27:46+00:00): Bom dia, encontrei muitas duplicações aqui, removi várias com ajuda do JOSM.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-16 05:26:57+00:00): You changed name but not name:he