piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-11-25 09:15:17+00:00): The ways themselves are not broken The split at the bus stop west side is OK since a 2 hike routes take a left at bottom of steps.

Ground imagery of Feb 22 shows a marked crossing missing from the map where the footway connects to the road. There's a bus stop painted on road, but no pole and a 3 car parking. Not going to touch anything more here as that what I came for has been corrected.

I know there are bugs in the history keeping. I.e. problems show up on the Inspector maps who's last tag is years ago, nothing in the history to indicate there was a change, yet there was a change. Yesterday a self intersecting building,  V1, 4 years ago, yet the self intersection must be from the day before as the building renders in 2km zoom and below (1 week old render update) but not in 1km and up (render update in minutes). Just fix it and move on. If I could put my finger on it I'd report it, but cant. The OSM change log few iterations ago mentioned a better tag retention and history when splitting, but can't this here as a statement of improvement.

BTW, This is what Turbo overpass says

create way 1116858964
timestamp	2022-11-24 12:28
user	micheleOSM3
version	1
changeset	129320775
highway	primary
lanes	2
maxspeed	50
maxweight	5
noname	yes
ref	SS14
surface	asphalt

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129320775&relations=true

First there was a change from V14 to V15, then a split was applied at the bus stop where a hike route seems to have overshot to the south past the bus stop on east side. Cut point was fine, why all 188 route got lost, not just the hike part is mysterious.

As an aside there's a maxweight=5 on that road. Primary, brand new asphalt, doubt it. No source:maxweight tag to say what the source is of the restriction. Don't want to know but suspect it's something that proliferated when early there was 1 long way mapped in OSM for the SS14.

Caio
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-25 11:49:34+00:00): I couldn't understand everything you wrote, for example, what is route 188?
About versions, AFAIK a "split" increases the version by a "way" and set the v1 version on the second "way", which is what happened.
The maxweight=5 was there before my "split" and it remained even after.
What I don't understand is: 
What errors did you detect?
What errors did you correct?
Has one or more way-relation associations been lost? 
Was there a route 188 that is now lost?
So that I can possibly spot problems better in the future.
SekeRob (2022-11-25 12:20:44+00:00): 188 > 18 (routes).
All is fine now, that is for the various bits that would need reviewing updating and adding, but that's wont be on my calendar or Todo.

The version inheriting is correct, the loss of the 18 routes on the V1 segment is not. It just should not have happened with just a simple way split, I know for a fact that route G21 was closed, Ran 3 weeks ago an analysis and the outcome was that all was fine. Reloaded the bookmarked link and the report states it's fine again:

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=14341380&_noCache=on

caio
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-25 12:30:48+00:00): Did you detect that 18 routes were lost on v1?
And did you correct them?
SekeRob (2022-11-25 12:40:25+00:00): Just select the V1 piece in ID Editor edit view. The sidepanel should list 18 relations lest someone came in and made other changes afterwards
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-25 12:46:32+00:00): After my split, did you see that 18 relations were lost?
After my split, did you add the 18 missing relations?
mappinglander (2022-11-24 12:42:21+00:00): Merhabalar,
OpenStreetMap'e katkıda bulunduğunuz için teşekkürler. Ancak eklediğiniz yerin üzerinde etiketlemeler birkaç düzeltme yapmak zorunda kaldım. Dert etmeyin, bu oldukça normal. Ama size önerim, fotoğrafı Google Maps yerine özgür lisansla Wikimedia Commons veya Mapillary uygulamasına yükleyip bağlantı koymanız. Böylelikle uygulamalar daha rahat bir şekilde bu resmi kullanabilirler.
eggie (2022-11-24 12:23:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Maar wanneer een bedrijf stopt betekent dit niet dat er geen adresmeer is.  Dus beter de adresnodes intact laten en alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-24 12:26:11+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer hersteld

Groet
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:46:58+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300289
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:47:45+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/12930029
ElliottPlack (2022-11-24 16:52:57+00:00): @pitscheplatsch looks like your link is wrong by a digit. Here is the original changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300298
ElliottPlack (2022-11-24 16:54:28+00:00): Thanks for reverting. I think the pipeline data is actually useful data for the project and I would support adding them. These blocks however are meaningless as localities. This part could have been dropped from the import.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:46:18+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300314
ivanbranco (2022-11-28 19:49:07+00:00): colour=verde
start_date=Novembre 2022

Ciao Pasquale,

il tagging corretto è
colour=green (vedere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour) 
start_date=2022-11 (vedere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start%20date)
eggie (2022-11-24 12:10:47+00:00): Bij gelijksoortige wegen 
geldt de uitzondering ook voor brommers en snorfietsen.
Dus dan toevoegen 
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

groet
eggie
eggie (2022-11-24 18:45:27+00:00): moped en mofa heb ik nog even aangepast volgens bovenstaande tagging. 
Het zal nu allemaal kloppen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-24 12:17:25+00:00): Zo is het oke.. Ik heb even paaltjes toegevoegd.
De turning_circle heb ik verwijderd op de node. Die is niet meer nodig nu. 
footway heb ik omgezet in highway=path
Kort door de bocht.. Een G7 bord vooraan is een highway=footway

Geen bord is een highway=path
Dat routeert ook voor tweewielers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-24 12:37:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
lipuma (2022-11-24 13:09:18+00:00): Dank je wel! Ik zal je bericht lezen en de linkjes bekijken.
DUGA (2025-01-01 15:50:05+00:00): Leave your company's garbage at your internal place rather than putting it at OSM. alt_name is quite controversial when the street has an official name assigned by the local authority.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17506686/history#map=18/41.052769/-76.231315
DUGA (2025-01-01 15:52:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop
RamanKazadoi (2025-01-08 09:09:08+00:00): Hi, DUGA! Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate your concern about maintaining the quality and integrity of data on OpenStreetMap. We’re sorry if our internal guidelines or practices led to this entry being inconsistent with OSM’s standards. I value constructive dialogue to ensure OSM remains a reliable resource for everyone. Please let me know if there are specific adjustments you’d recommend. Thanks again for bringing this to my attention!
Diacritic (2022-11-25 06:29:42+00:00): Hey Scotty :)

I've just updated the walkways at Greensborough Plaza from a Footway+Tunnel to a Corridor for more accuracy. The rest of your edit looks really good! :)

Dian
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:43:55+00:00): Hi Markwin,
I'm curious, is this a data import?
opendcc (2022-11-24 13:14:14+00:00): Hallo und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Für das Mappen einer Praxis gibt es passende Tags (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare ). D.h. man setzt einen Punkt, trägt die Infos da ein. Das Gebäude selbst wird nicht benannt. Hilft Ihnen das weiter?
tux67 (2022-11-24 13:26:25+00:00): Hallo ActiveNotion,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Kleiner Heinweis - Telefonnummern bei OSM werden im ITU Format gemappt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone#Anwendung
Die Hausnummer 128 hatte jemand in einem der vorhergehenden Changes gelöscht.

Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129323856
ActiveNotion (2022-11-27 22:06:24+00:00): Hallo, 
vielen Dank für die Begrüßung, Angebote und Hinweise!
Wurde beigeschrieben warum die Hausnummer 128 gelöscht wurde? Ich war vor Ort und weiß dass es sich um zwei Gebäude mit unterschiedlichen Hausnummern handelt. Wäre toll wenn das wieder richtig gestellt wird. Esser und Stinges sind mit bei Netto in der 126 richtig angelegt.

Grüße
tux67 (2022-11-28 05:35:48+00:00): Hi,

Ich denke der Kollege, der die Hausnummer gelöscht hat, hat sich auf die ALKIS Daten, bzw. die Daten aus dem Geoportal der Stadt Mönchengladbach verlassen. Die stimmen aber auch nicht immer.
Ich setze die Hausnummern auf 2 separate Nodes, so das sie auch getrennt erscheinen. 

Gruß
Tux67
tux67 (2022-11-28 07:17:06+00:00): Aktualisiert ist das jetzt -  dauert vielleicht ein Weilchen bis man es sehen kann - Bei Osmand vielleicht noch was länger, wenn du nicht gerade Osmand Live hast.
arvdk (2022-12-05 12:28:11+00:00): Mag ik u vragen om iets gedetailleerder uw aanpassing te omschrijven? In dit geval bijvoorbeeld: "Breedte toegevoegd aan footway".
gscholz (2022-12-18 07:24:06+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=80.46805&lat=6.69205&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129122871

Can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-27 06:11:09+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 15:34:56+00:00): Slds. Por que eliminar el Nombre descriptivo de la Frontera si la Wiki permite poner el Nombre?
Donde esta el Standard que Pone el Nombre en Description y no en Name?
Gracias
felipeeugenio (2022-11-24 16:08:37+00:00): Estimado
1) No encuentro donde dice que las fronteras tienen que tener un nombre, no obstante estamos seguros que algunas lo tienen. En el caso de Chile, la línea de la Concordía, que es la frontera con Perú, efectivamente tiene un nombre.
2) Aunque tuvieran que tener un nombre, tendría que demostrar que el nombre es ese y exactamente ese, el cual sería algo redundante, ya que los nombres de los países van en la relación. El mismo render lo muestra.
3) Además, el nombre que agregó viene con un paréntesis que indica a todas luces que es descriptiva. Es acaso esto para usarse en algun ruteador?
4) Estos cambios se discuten con las comunidades involucradas y usted debería saberlo y no agregando el nombre de cuando en cuando por si acaso nadie lo nota. 

Saludos
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 16:38:38+00:00): En la wiki establece Usefull Combinations, con lo cual se autoriza el Uso de Nombres. No hay Nada que diga q Un Nombre tiene que ser Discutido pues es un Valor Factual. Frontera Bolivia-Chile.

El valor en Parentesis es solo para establecer que es solo un valor Referencial Y no un valor Legal. 

y sobre el Punto 4, No hago nada Ni necesito hacer Nada "por si acaso nadie lo nota" me parece GROSERO su comentario, de paso.

Mientras la Wiki AUTORICE el Nombre NO HAY NADA que impida que tal NOMBRE se ponga. 

Saludos
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 16:40:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 16:52:08+00:00): Y como usted menciona me parece excelente discutirlo entre Comunides, pero ya su comentario lo invalida como "representante" de una comunidad, asi q le agradezco me diga con quien se debe tratar el tema para q no haya "por si acasos nadie lo nota" y/u otras majaderias.
felipeeugenio (2022-11-24 16:59:26+00:00): Estimado. Ruego por favor leer el primer punto de mi respuesta. Estoy hablando del verbo TENER. Useful es distinto de must have. Si la frontera tiene un nombre, entonces agregarlo. Pero no tiene, y la descripción que usted da es la retorica perfecta para un nombre descriptivo.
Es más, sus intentos anteriores de nombres de este tipo han sido eliminados por miembros de la misma comunidad boliviana.

Saludos
jptolosa (2022-11-24 17:00:53+00:00): Hola JJIglesias, el que diga useful combination no quiere decir que haya que colocar un nombre a la fuerza, que hasta donde sabemos no posee un nombre. Además escribir "Frontera Bolivia-Chile (Solo Referencia)" se trata claramente de una descripción, no de un nombre y pareces darnos la razón tú mismo en el segundo párrafo.

Dado lo controversial del nombre que estás usando es algo que debe ser acordado con la comunidad chilena.

Saludos.
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 17:29:06+00:00): Si bien No hay un MUST HAVE, tampoco implica que DO NOT NEED TO HAVE. Por lo cual esta abierta a poner o no poner. 

El tema de Solo Referencia es perfectamente discutible pues las fronteras OSM NO SON OFICIALES sino referenciales.

En todos los tratados que he podido leer, No hay Nombre Oficial para la frontera BO-CH como pones de referencia entre CH-PE. Por lo cual el Nombre Frontera Bolivia-Chile, Frontera Chile-Bolivia es un nombre Generico que nombra un limite administrativo nivel 2

Y te repito ante tu comentario pernicioso, te agradezco me digas con quien debo comunicarme. Definitivamente con usted. No es el tema.

Gracias
felipeeugenio (2022-11-24 18:29:14+00:00): Hola
Simplemente no puede llegar y agregar nombre descriptivos (entre otras cosas) insistentemente a una frontera, incluso después de que miembros de su misma comunidad lo borraron también.
Sobre el resto de su argumentación, lo único que hace es confirmar de que está agregando un nombre descriptivo.
Por otro lado, la referencia que hace a las fronteras en OSM no entiendo a qué se refiere. Supongo que está refiriéndose a mapas de papel que agregan el disclaimer de la frontera referencial para evitar problemas jurídicos. Pues ese no es el caso de las fronteras en OSM. 
Si quiere conversar con alguien entendido en fronteras en Chile puede hacerlo con Julio Costa o Juan Pablo Tolosa.
Lamentablemente no es posible continuar una conversación estos términos.
JJIglesias (2022-11-24 19:42:00+00:00): Exactamente, bajo estos terminos puestos por usted "o agregando el nombre de cuando en cuando por si acaso nadie lo nota." 
No tengo nada que hablar con usted.
Punto.
trigpoint (2022-11-28 12:56:06+00:00): Hi Hannah
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.

One small problem, in order for a path to be used it needs to be connected to other ways. For some reason you have stopped short of the roads at either end.

If you need any help please feel to ask.

Cheers Phil
papapam (2022-12-08 12:54:21+00:00): "Rant Yolu"? burası siyaset yapılacak bir yer değil. Değişikliğinizi düzeltiyorum.
yancı (2022-12-08 13:47:26+00:00): Niyetim siyaset yapmak değil yolun kamuoyunda bilinen adı olan "Rant Yolu"nu da isme eklemekti. alt_name key'i olarak "Rant Yolu"nu tekrar ekliyorum.
papapam (2022-12-10 20:34:06+00:00): Teşekkürler. Daha iyi oldu.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ticki_52 (2023-11-05 11:00:18+00:00): Da Du ja weltweit aktiv bist, schreib doch in Deinen Kommentaren zu den CS den Ort dazu. "Backnang: works Umrisse" wäre suuuper.

Zu Deiner Info: "alt_name=Tesat" zusammen mit "name=Ericsson" ist nicht korrekt Die beiden Firmen haben nichts miteinander zu tun. Die beiden Werksgelände sind komplett getrennt. Hab's aktualisiert.
roadyboy (2023-11-05 11:11:19+00:00): Vielen Dank. Ich kann deine Änderung gerade nicht finden, aber es klingt auf jeden Fall sinnvoll.
ticki_52 (2023-11-05 14:46:32+00:00): Und dann noch etwas: Umrisse ändern  auf fremdem Gebiet ist nicht gut. Wenn der Bildversatz anders ist als beim native mapper, passt nichts mehr zusammen. Vielen Dank!!!!!
NorthCrab (2022-11-24 21:38:43+00:00): Witaj,

start_date powinien być w dacie zgodnej z ISO 8601-01.

czyli:
start_date=2022-10-01 (jeśli mowa o 1ym października)
start_date=2022-01-10 (jeśli mowa o 10ym stycznia)

więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start%20date

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 06:01:22+00:00): Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129766443
map per (2022-11-24 19:37:20+00:00): Bezüglich "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":
Sieht gut aus, danke!
HellMap (2022-11-26 16:17:01+00:00): Sveiki!

Pamanīju, ka ar šo izmaiņu izdzēsti daži adrešu punkti, piem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9876377880/history . Lūgums tādus nedzēst - adreses Latvijā ir no oficiāliem kadastra datiem un gandrīz vienmēr pareizas pat, ja īpašums ir meža vidū. Pie tam, importa bots tās tik un tā vēlāk atjaunotu.

Paldies!
aachso (2022-11-28 00:37:53+00:00): Hallo Lena und willkommen bei OSM!

Prinzipiell ist das so richtig, allerdings gehört die Postleitzahl immer zur Adresse (Gebäude ohne Adresse haben keine PLZ, sekbst wenn sie sich in einem PLZ-Gebiet befinden). Deshalb sollte die PLZ immer zusammen mit Straße und Hausnummer (soweit vorhanden bzw bekannt) eingetragen werden.

In diesem Fall hat das Haus A keine Adresse eingetragen, weil es hier die Besonderheit gibt, dass die Häuser A/B/C sich die Adresse teilen. Deshalb ist die Adresse nicht an einem oder an allen drei Häusern, sondern in einer Multipolygon-Relation erfasst, die alle drei Gebäude beinhaltet, siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7324747

Dort ist die PLZ allerdings bereits hinzugefügt :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mike140 (2022-12-02 20:07:38+00:00): для виправлення геометрії будинків виділіть будівлю та натисніть Q
Євгеній913 (2022-12-03 01:02:40+00:00): Я учасник OSM з телефонних пристроїв тому, mike140, я не маю можливості самому виправити помилки.
mike140 (2022-12-03 08:37:49+00:00): Навіть якщо ви редагуєте з телефону в iD-редакторі, можна довго натиснути на будівлі - з'явитися контекстне меню, де треба обрати квадрат
mike140 (2022-12-03 09:55:58+00:00): До речі, для редагування з телефону рекомендую Vespucci - повноцінний osm-редактор (під Андроїд).
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-12-02 18:11:30+00:00): Hi, do you mind adding parking=street_side to parkings like this? Those P's are quite dominating the view currently, street_side's P's are at least smaller in the default renderer.
Apirnus (2022-12-02 18:24:38+00:00): Hello, sure thing.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
fahrimwald (2022-12-20 22:55:37+00:00): Die Brücke in OSM wurde wieder an die Stelle der alten Brücke zurückversetzt. Die neue Brücke ist nicht dort, wo die meisten GPS tracks sind, sondern weiter südöstlich, wo der einzelne GPS track ist. Luftbilder zeigen das ebenfalls. Bitte korrigieren!
user1984 (2022-12-21 12:39:01+00:00): Die Brücke selbts habe ich nicht verschoben, nur den Radweg getrennt über die Autobahn gezogen, damit das stimmt.
Ich ziehe die Brücke mal Richtung Süden, damit sie zum Luftbild passt.
A67-A67 (2022-11-24 17:02:10+00:00): Buildings in the Netherlands are imported from the BAG-register. You can request an import here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/250

I've asked it for this building now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
JeSe-MX (2022-11-26 10:57:01+00:00): Porqué se eliminó la versión 3D de la pirámide del pueblito?

Había algún error que no podía ser corregido?
dgmapping (2023-10-23 15:32:07+00:00): Varemetes hoone - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231841578

Antud juhul peaks building=yes silt vist ikkagi alles jääma?

Mulle endale tundub, et varemete kaardistamisel on building=yes + ruins=yes kõige levinum.

Alternatiivina peaks ka ruins:building=yes sobima.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 16:06:32+00:00): i usually put building=ruins and ruins=yes
dgmapping (2023-10-27 17:05:39+00:00): According to wiki changing building tag to ruins is not the best practice. If building type is missing then it doesn't matter if you replace "yes" with "ruins". But generally any other value in building tag shouldn't be overwritten.
Nearby0051 (2022-11-27 14:12:29+00:00): reverted, vandalism