piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:58:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:39:57+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
eggie (2018-01-24 08:29:20+00:00): De node ligt een beetje uit de buurt van de kerk. Bovendien was de kerk al als zodanig getagd. Ik haal je bijdrage weg.
eggie (2018-01-24 08:35:33+00:00): De info van de kerk staat allemaal op het gebouw. Dat is met mapse.me niet makkelijk te zien denk ik. 
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Glassman (2018-01-24 02:25:13+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55697656
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-12-29 16:42:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-01-27 16:03:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
eggie (2018-01-24 08:30:54+00:00): Je verandert hier het huisnummer van de kerk. Klopt dat wel?
eggie (2018-01-24 08:34:25+00:00): Volgens de website inderdaad nr 11.
Hjart (2018-01-23 22:50:35+00:00): Jeg har rullet denne ændring tilbage
Hjart (2018-01-23 22:51:39+00:00): Stedet er i høj grad af arkæologisk interesse og derfor bør dette tag ikke slettes
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:05:51+00:00): Det har uden tvivl arkæologisk interesse, men der har heller ikke været nogen arkæologisk undersøgelse i de sidste 25 år+. 
Som det er på nuværende tidspunkt, så er det mere en tourist attraktion og en mindre park med historie og natur. Det er bare mine undersøgelser efter at jeg har gået der ned ca 1 gang om ugen i de sidste 25 år.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:10:53+00:00): Der er stadig tale om et fortidsminde af stor betydning og disse markerer vi som "arkæologiske" steder uanset hvor længe siden der er blevet gravet og undersøgt i dem.
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:13:22+00:00): Så vidt jeg kan finde ud af, så her der ikke været nogen arkæologisk undersøgelse på stedet i over 50 år i følge beboer i omårdet.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:14:37+00:00): Det behøver der heller ikke at have været
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:16:16+00:00): Bemærk at her er tale om et vigtigt fortidsminde. Der er heller ikke tale om "monoliths", men derimod "menhirs" (på dansk "bautasten")
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:17:36+00:00): Så i følge dig, så er det lige meget hvad stedet er på nuværende tidspunkt og holder fast på at, fordi stedet har historie, så er det "arkæologiske"?
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:19:12+00:00): Stedet er også på nuværende tidspunkt et vigtigt fortidsminde, uanset anvendelsen.
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:20:09+00:00): Det er det meste af øen
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:25:43+00:00): Også lidt information fra selve stedet "Loisenlund has the largest collection of monoliths on Bornholm. There are about 50 monoliths here, but originally there were far more".
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:25:59+00:00): Bemærk at dette sted er af særlig interesse
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:31:33+00:00): Som man kan se af f.eks. http://www.kulturarv.dk/fundogfortidsminder/Lokalitet/191250/ fører arkæologerne jævnligt tilsyn med stedet
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:31:52+00:00): Bemærk også https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisenlund
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:32:07+00:00): For tourister og beboerne i området og vi holder meget af stedet og passer godt på det. Jeg rydder selv op det nede og kender stedet rimelig godt og jeg, samt beboerne i området, siger at det er en park med historie.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:33:41+00:00): Jeg ville ikke vurdere det som en egentlig park.
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:37:50+00:00): Bor du her? Jeg kan kigge ud af vinduet lige nu og se hvad der sker, jeg kender stedet fordi jeg bor der. Og ja, de kommer forbi omkring 1 gang om året og ikke jævnligt og hvordan ved jeg det? Fordi jeg kender deres hvide Berlingo og jeg bor her. Så er din vurdering  taget fra hvad du kan finde på nettet eller har du direkte tilknytning til stedet?
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:40:43+00:00): Nej, jeg bor der ikke, men på den anden side har jeg stor erfaring med hvordan vi tagger ting i OSM.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:42:52+00:00): Og udfra dine skriverier får jeg også indtryk af at du ikke helt er klar over stedets betydning.
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:46:31+00:00): Og det er også fint nok du har styr på det, men vi du have direkte information fra personer, som er fra eller bor på området for at få den mest up to date information eller information som er skrevet i starten af 2000.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:49:00+00:00): Jeg tror jeg vil foretrække at læse hvad arkæologerne skriver
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:51:27+00:00): Ikke klar over stedets betydning? Det er en del af Danmarks historie helt tilbage fra 1850, så jo, jeg er klar over stedets betydning.
Hjart (2018-01-23 23:53:51+00:00): 1850? Ifølge arkæologerne er de rejst i jernalderen, så jeg tvivler på du er ret meget klar over hvad du har med at gøre.
Cartune (2018-01-23 23:56:48+00:00): Ja det er korrekt og det vides ikke hvorfor de blev rejst, de blev almindeligt rejst over gravsteder. I 1851, mener jeg det var, så købte Kong Frederik d. VII stedet og navn gav stedet efter Grevinde Louise Danner.
Hjart (2018-01-24 00:01:21+00:00): Jeg er godt bekendt med historien
Cartune (2018-01-24 00:06:51+00:00): Og jeg er meget bekendt med selve stedet personligt, lige som de andre her i området.
Cartune (2018-01-24 00:09:21+00:00): Så at sige til mig at jeg ikke er klar over hvad jeg har med at gøre...Hvem tror du jeg er? en tilfældig som tænkte "hmm, det er sku da en park det der, jeg ændre det lige på OpenStreetMap"...nej.
Cartune (2018-01-24 00:14:03+00:00): Ved også at stedet er frede og som regel er fredet steder lukket for det offentlige, men ikke Louisenlund, den er åbent for det offentlige, men man skal også respektere området. Det er også et sted hvor folk som var i par, snittede deres initialer ind i træerne på den vestlige side, som også går helt tilbage til 1980.
Hjart (2018-01-24 00:14:19+00:00): At du er "meget" bekendt med stedet gør dig ikke nødvendigvis til ekspert. Jeg kan konstaterere at arkæologerne har undersøgt stedet endog temmelig grundigt og kan forstå at de fører tilsyn med det mindst en gang årligt. Det er for mig mere end rigeligt til at kalde det et "arkæologisk sted"
Hjart (2018-01-24 00:16:15+00:00): Masser af fredede steder i Danmark er fuldt tilgængelige for "det offentlige".
Cartune (2018-01-24 00:29:26+00:00): Fint, det er noget være plader, men hvis du ikke vil høre på en, som faktisk har viden om området, så kan du beholde din "arkæologisk sted", jeg kan da godt se jeg har ingen anelse om hvad jeg snakker om og hvis du er i tvivl, ja jeg er lidt sur lige pt, fordi jeg sidder her kl 1:30 om natten og diskutere om et sted, som jeg har ingen anelse om hvad er, så tak du var "meget" hjælpsom.
user_5359 (2018-01-24 05:57:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You decide the opening_hours? Is there any source (like a website) for this information?
ssolni (2018-01-24 19:03:41+00:00): I didn't want to put the wrong format.  I'll fix it, they're fixed hours, just weird.  Just learning how OSM works.
user_5359 (2018-01-24 19:05:23+00:00): If you need help: You are welcome!
ssolni (2018-01-24 19:06:56+00:00): Thanks!
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Jakka (2018-01-24 12:17:17+00:00): Verbindingen niet vergeten om van fietpaden de zijstraten aan de overkant te kunnen bereiken.
Ook op de hoofdweg waar gescheiden fietspaden staan ingetekend tag bicycle use_sidepath zodat de routeplanners de fietpaden nemen boven de hoofdweg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
viloan (2018-01-23 22:47:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
frosm (2018-02-21 14:15:02+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476727805
quel signifies lanes=0 ?
une route ne peux pas ne pas avoir de bande de circulation. il y en a fatalement au moins une.
dans ce cas ci, l'imagerie aérienne BDOrtho en montre même 2
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-11 23:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This also reverts some other bad edits which rely on versions uploaded by this import.
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:43:14+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 17:40:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55698673
viloan (2018-01-24 00:13:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Virginia Winter (2018-01-24 00:27:48+00:00): Hit confirm on the Changeset label without updating - should have said "Added local business"
Virginia Winter (2018-01-24 00:27:30+00:00): Hit confirm on the Changeset label without updating - should have said "Added local business"
Virginia Winter (2018-01-24 00:29:09+00:00): Hit confirm on the Changeset label without updating - should have said "changed icon to gift shop"
user_5359 (2018-01-24 05:55:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please? Please also the value of the housenumber, it should be a the digits number. Also if this building contains a barber shop, please add a shop=hairdresser.
neuhausr (2018-02-12 14:49:45+00:00): Hi, I am another OSM editor in the area and just wanted to point out a couple things you might keep in mind going forward: 1) If an area (like the farmland southeast of Cty Rd 50 and Halsey Ave) has an "island" in it of a different type of area (like the forested area), you should create a multipolygon relation and tag the "outer" and "inner" areas separately as described here: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22542/how-do-i-map-an-island-in-a-lake-using-id-editor-and-the-multipolygon-tag 2) it's not a hard rule, but generally recommended that landuse-type areas not attach to roads, and instead stop where they actually stop (usually next to a road--see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes). Aside from being more accurate, it often makes future editing easier. Thanks again for all your editing and happy future mapping!
user_5359 (2018-01-24 05:51:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555319761 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555319796 .
viloan (2018-01-24 01:00:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hugo Toscano (2018-01-24 02:51:15+00:00): Amigo viloan,

Eu não tenho ideia de como funciona esse negócio de Pokemon. 
Meu interesse exclusivo é colaborar com as atualizações realizadas em meu bairro e vizinhos.

Sou corredor e achei prudente atualizar o Calçadão de Candeias.

De fato sou inexperiente e posso ter errado em algo. Peço desculpas aos envolvidos da comunidade e garanto que tentarei minimizar esses erros.

Muito obrigado pelas boas vindas.

Abraços,

Hugo Toscano
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-28 12:56:38+00:00): Eu reverti todas suas edições, você colocou vias passando uma por cima das outras e bagunçou bastante. Se quiser tentar novamente fique a vontade.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-01-07 19:06:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4121283/history to cmentarz komunalny, prawda? Więc tagów religion i denomination nie powinno na nim być.
maraf24 (2018-01-25 19:13:48+00:00): 1. drogi wystarczająco szerokie, by zmieścił się samochód oznaczamy jak track (conajmniej)
2. to, czy droga jest jest utwardzona wcale nie określa, czy jest trackiem. Trackami są wszelkie drogi nieistotne czy nieodpowiednie dla normalnego ruchu samochodowego samochodowego, w tym drogi na wałach i drogi dojazdowe do pól/działek  przy wałach, nawet jeśli są asfaltowe.
emes (2018-01-26 09:07:32+00:00): Z czego wynika taka kategoryzacja? Przejrzałem wiki i nie widzę nigdzie jednoznacznego określenia jak takie drogi powinny być oznaczane.

Z kolei oznaczenie drogi utwardzonej, równej i wyposażonej w krawężniki jako coś lepszego niż track niesie za sobą jedną niezaprzeczalną korzyść: od razu widać, że można tam wjechać samochodem osobowym lub rowerem na wąskich oponach.
user_4493657 (2018-01-26 15:45:35+00:00): Witam. Tak jest jak maraf24 napisał. Zastanowiłbym się nad innym tagiem niż surface=compacted bo ten tag kojarzy mi się z uklepaną ziemią ktora w czasie deszczu rozpływa się poprostu i grade1 compacted nie pasują. Co innego jaby droga była pokryta czymś trwałym(beton, asfalt, bruk) albo utwardzona szlaką, szutrem.
emes (2018-01-27 08:43:59+00:00): Tag surface=compacted jest opisany na wiki i pasuje dokładnie do tego typu nawierzchni.
user_4493657 (2018-01-27 11:27:21+00:00): Według mnie jest to zbyt ogólne okreslenie ponieważ nie wiem czym droga jest pokryta. Czy przypadkiem tracktype=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype nie opisuje dokładnie zagęszczenia nawierzchni drogi? Może lepiej pasowałoby surface=fine_gravel/gravel+smoothness=good+tracktype=grade1/grade2?
emes (2018-01-27 13:55:41+00:00): Tag smoothness jak najbardziej można dodać. Tracktype w obecnej sytuacji też, wg mnie jest to grade1. Natomiast surface=gravel/fine_gravel raczej pasuje do nawierzchni sypkich. Z kolei compacted to makadam, nawierzchnia z podłożem z tłucznia i górną warstwą z ubitego grysu. Dokładnie taka tam się znajduje.
user_4493657 (2018-01-27 14:36:51+00:00): Prawdę mówiąc nie wiedzę różnicy pomiędzy surface=gravel/fine_gravel a compacted. W definicji na wiki brakuje średnicy frakcji(jako kluczowa cecha). Drogi wysypane gravel/fine_gravel również są zagęszczane(tak w ogóle to materiały budowlane same się zagęszczają pod włąsnym ciężarem tylko nikt nie bedzie czekał powiedzmy 2lata). Faktycznie niestety jest zbyt duża różnica w wygladzie na mapie pomiędzy grade1 a grade2.
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-26 18:41:33+00:00): Hi SubotaiBaatur, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting several parks? Thanks.
viloan (2018-01-24 01:30:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!