piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robert Whittaker (2019-10-23 16:32:54+00:00): highway=bicycle is not a recognised tag, but perhaps you are thinking of highway=cycleway instead? (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway .)

However for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327755843 it really needs a ground survey to determine what highway=* value is appropriate, depending on the physical condition on the ground and whether the route is physically accessible at the two ends.

highway=cycleway is very unlikely to be appropriate -- rural routes like this with no maintained surface will not be "cycleways" in any meaningful sense. If the route is accessible and appears either as a path or with little evidence of use, I'd probably use highway=bridleway . If there's a clear track (suitable for off-road vehicle use) then I'd use highway=track. If it is not accessible and there's no signs of any use, I'd use highway=no.
jpgon (2015-02-12 13:21:45+00:00): Apresentando erro ao salvar de número 28795031. Alterado TAG de arruamentos no distrito industrial, e realinhamento de ruas, como inserido nós separando seguimentos.
jpgon (2015-02-12 13:24:12+00:00): O erro ao salvar é "2 of Node 2640357824".
Não consigo visualizar e corrigir
trigpoint (2015-02-12 13:36:54+00:00): Hello, welcome to Openstreetmap.
I think something has gone wrong with your edits, you seem to have added some untagged ways that make little sense to me.
Maybe we can help, what are you trying to achieve?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-19 10:37:02+00:00): I'm guessing that the name of the road junction at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3345845102 isn't really "Please give feedback about Road Conditions to roadconditions.bw@gmail.com" ?
Skippern (2015-02-12 15:48:21+00:00): Favor se possos, coloque um comentario do changeset, para pessoas verificando a mapa intender o que voce tentando fazer. O comentário não preciso ser detalhado, por exemplo "acertando geometria da rua", "alinhando" ou similar
jotpe (2015-02-12 17:57:11+00:00): Sofern hier keine zwei Etagen sind, bitte wieder herstellen. Zusätzlich fehlte wohl noch ein "building:part=yes".
hmassloch (2015-02-12 18:20:30+00:00): Sorry, ist wieder hergestellt. Die Hausnummer ist 195-199 und "Porzer Repro & Druckcenter" ist ein Oberbegriff für mehrere Firmen im Gebäude.
philippec (2016-09-13 16:44:36+00:00): I think it does not exist any more.  I will delete the bicycle_parking tomorrow.
zool (2015-02-13 16:41:21+00:00): You're contributing some changesets with a lot of deletions to tagged ways, and they stretch right across Europe. There's too much going on in each changeset to easily explore the consequences, so it would be good to have a clear description of what you are changing and why, rather than the repeated "osmi routing view fixes".

I take it that osmi refers to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing but is deletion of data necessary in these cases? It would be good to hear more in the comments or discussions about what motivates these changes.
ratrun (2015-02-13 18:56:36+00:00): Yes. OSMI is exactly the tool for which you provided the documentation link above.

The wiki already explains what I'm doing and also includes an answer to your question about deletions in the changes-sets. This is what the wiki says about deletion. It is located in the "What you can do with this view to improve OSM data" section there and says: "Go through the duplicate ways and fix those cases. Sometimes whole ways overlap, sometimes only parts. Look at the tags of both ways, consolidate them and then remove one of the ways." 

Here is one example, which is not yet fixed: 

Way 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178257938
was there first. Then user mcheckimport created an overlapping duplicate with tags for a cycleway: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275193195

This is a very frequent obvious error.

One possibility to fix it, would be to create a relation for the cycleway, put the first way (ID=178257938) into this new relation and delete the way with way ID 275193195. By doing so also every duplicated node gets deleted.

Deletion of nodes also automatically happens in case that one merges two close nodes, which were not properly connected.

My changesets cover such a big areas now, because the most prominent errors classified as "Unconnected major<1m distance" are getting rare and if I fix some of those, the whole changeset gets visible in a big area. I can't do anything about this. It is an issue of the OSM changeset view as it does not show only the changes within the active bounding box, but rather within the bounding box of the changeset. 

If I don't forget I'll try to commit and comment those “Unconnected major” fixes separately in the future. These changesets will still cover a big area, but contain fewer changes.

I hope that this answers your concerns.
tyr_asd (2015-02-13 19:26:05+00:00): Why don't you simply save each individual OSMI fix in an individual changeset?
ratrun (2015-02-15 08:41:24+00:00): I don't do this because it spams the displayed amount of changset if one fixes bugs in small areas with many problems. This is the usual case. Every single upload would generate a small changeset, all containing the same comment. My experience is that it is good to perform multiple uploads and not just one big one in order to reduce the probability of getting a conflict in case that somebody else is fixing concurrently.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 09:25:22+00:00): Actually, it would be better if each small change didn't "all contain the same comment".  For example, rather than simply "osmi routing view fixes" the one that replaced http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304192905/history with http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2971905214 could say something like "Kastellbell: replaced pedestrian crossing drawn across the road but not joining it with crossing node on the road itself".  That way it's easy for local mappers to see exactly what has changed and why (and it also helps in cases such as this for experienced mappers to contact the previous mapper and explain politely why "a footway crossing a road but not joining it" is not a good representation of a pedestrian crossing - that way they'd know for the next time they needed to map one.
ratrun (2015-02-15 09:40:23+00:00): This is impractial. Connecting two nodes is a matter of 1 second, writing the comments would take at least 40 seconds. If you are working on such granuarity, then congratulations from me, but I won't do that.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 10:00:39+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a community - together we benefit from all the work that all other mappers have done.  If a new mapper doesn't know that they're "doing it wrong" simply because no-one has been bothered to tell them, then they'll continue to do so, because they don't know any better, and there'll be more things that need correcting in the future.  If people do take the small amount of time needed to communicate effectively (by e.g. writing meaningful changeset comments) then they'll get things right next time.  There's a saying "Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime".
yeskela (2015-02-13 06:47:36+00:00): Извините, кажется Вы точку обронили. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3346004699
Hjart (2015-08-17 08:22:26+00:00): Jeg er ikke helt enig i at ændre dammen til en waterway=dam (dæmning)
cadsauxk (2015-02-15 13:01:48+00:00): Obrigado pela contribuição. Ao editar você introduziu, certamente se querer, uma nova esquina na Guajajaras. Não é necessário duplicar o nome da Vila no nome das ruas. 

Já fiz as correções:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28862635
cadsauxk (2015-02-15 13:03:05+00:00): Ah, e ruas que não tem saída é interessante colocar noexit=yes  na ponta (já coloquei também).
will_p (2015-02-12 18:34:30+00:00): What is your source for this change please?

I have a survey photo taken 4 days ago that clearly shows the name written on the stop is 'Train Station / Wilsthorpe Road'.
PmaiIkeey (2015-02-13 11:55:03+00:00): If the sign is incorrect, get the sign changed rather than duplicating the error on the map.
It works round here, I've had bus stop sign names corrected !
will_p (2015-02-13 12:52:54+00:00): Usage of 'train station' is widespread. If you consider it incorrect, then fine, you are entitled to that view, but it's inappropriate for you to impose your opinion on the data in OSM. We should be mapping what is there.  The sign has deliberately been written that way: it isn't a spelling mistake.
PmaiIkeey (2015-02-13 23:46:31+00:00): "we should be mapping what is there" - I totally agree - but it's not the OSM style - they label roads by their classification (A,B,C,U) and don't care whether the road is a farm track or a dual carriageway.

Anyway, I've wasted too much of the day on this today but for info I've contacted the CEO of Network Rail, Nottinghamshire Council's Transportation Strategy and Notts City bus co which seems to be the source of the error - so watch this space in peace and harmony !
MikeN (2015-02-13 01:38:10+00:00): Hi, Is the University Center moving here from its current location on Pleasantburg?  ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40173170 )
Curtis Beck (2015-02-13 16:56:14+00:00): Mike, Thanks for pointing this out to me. The University Center is not moving here. The corresponding map I am using pins the center to this location despite having the address listed on Pleasantburg as you do. 

I will go ahead and fix this
jotpe (2015-02-12 19:23:29+00:00): Die Adresse klebt bereits an der Relation vom Haus, ist also doppelt gemoppelt. Johannes
tux67 (2015-02-14 19:36:10+00:00): Hm, die Adresse am Gebäude hab' ich nicht gesehen .. aber die dem auch sei - Nominatim hat den Eintrag mit dem Suchbegriff "Standesamt" nicht angezeigt .. bessere Idee um nach Standesamt zu suchen und es bei Nominatim zu finden ?
jotpe (2015-02-15 00:39:49+00:00): Es gibt in Nominatim "special phrases" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/EN).
Du kannst ein Ticket in github (https://github.com/twain47/Nominatim/issues)  anlegen, dass Standesamt mit aufgenommen wird ( Gebäude ist als amenity=registry_office richtig getaggt)
tux67 (2015-02-18 09:59:48+00:00): Hi Johannes,

danke für den freundlichen Hinweis auf die Special Phrases für Nominatim. Kannte ich noch nicht. Das ändert natürlich alles ;-) und mein simplizistischer Ansatz über Name=Standesamt ist obsolet.

Eine Frage hätte ich dann noch ... Habe ich das richtig verstanden .. man trägt die Special Phrase ins Wiki ein .. (ist gemacht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/DE ) und stellt dann noch einen Github request um das zu aktivieren?

Damit kann ich ja dann die Adress und Names- Tags vom Entrance entfernen.

Danke & Gruß Stephan
jotpe (2015-02-18 19:39:55+00:00): So könnte es klappen. Könnte aber noch dauern bis es in der DB verfügbar sein wird. Gruß Johannes
Nakaner (2015-02-14 15:33:42+00:00): Beim Kindergarten sind dir zwei Fehler unterlaufen. 1. Nur das Gebäude ist ein Gebäude, weshalb nicht das gesamte Grundstück building=yes bekommt. 2. Ich glaube, dass amenity=kindergarten besser wäre als amenity=childcare. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare http://evkgka.de/index.php/ottowels.html
*Martin* (2015-02-12 19:26:38+00:00): Vdaka za opravu. Este ten juhozapadny kusok Kuzmanyho by asi tiez mal byt tertiary.
*Martin* (2015-02-12 19:27:49+00:00): A zmena je stale "bez komentára". Pri ukladani je dobra zadavat popis aby clovek mal zbeznu predstavu co bolo menene. Vdaka.
Guido Piazzi (2015-02-13 09:09:18+00:00): Ti ho corretto la way 165660524: c'erano tre errori nel nome!
pjhooker (2015-02-17 23:40:44+00:00): Grazie, come va?
rickmastfan67 (2015-02-13 12:06:13+00:00): Hi bwarren, I've been noticing recently you've been adding several car dealerships across the USA.  I'm just curious, but where are you getting the names/info for all of them?
spezialist (2015-02-14 23:20:26+00:00): Hi,
ich denke, die Sperrung sollte nicht in OSM eingetragen werden, ist ja nur vorübergehend und kein dauerhafter Zustand.
Gruß
hsimpson (2015-02-17 15:27:46+00:00): Siehe dazu hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28780674
SomeoneElse (2015-08-04 19:32:08+00:00): I fixed the key that you deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33109758 .
SomeoneElse (2015-08-05 17:23:02+00:00): For info, I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/409387 about this - current tags don't make a lot of sense.
marczoutendijk (2017-02-22 16:29:06+00:00): We zijn nu 2 jaar verder en er is nog niets aan bouwactiviteit te zien daar! Wat is de status?
VRU1 (2017-03-02 19:30:31+00:00): Hallo Marc,
Door drukte beetje late reactie, en ik moest er nog induiken.

De vertraging zit in het feit dat er bij de bouwvergunning is afgedwongen dat er eerst een geluidswall moet worden gebouwd.
Daar was wat gesteggel over ivm de aanbesteding.
Als het goed is dan is dat nu opgelost en komt er wat beweging in.
Dus houd de bouw van die geluidswall in de gaten dan weet je ook dat er vlak daarna gebouwd gaat worden.

Grtz

Dick
pnorman (2015-02-12 22:37:19+00:00): Hey,

I wanted to let you know that the tag to indicate a place accepts bitcoin is "payment:bitcoin", and if it's a bitcoin ATM, you should add an amenity=atm tag
pnorman (2015-02-12 22:37:53+00:00): Also, can you please use a more descriptive changeset comment than "Validation" so people can easily see what you're doing?
Robowolfer (2015-02-13 05:23:20+00:00): Of Course this is ATM. In future i'll make more correctly made changes. I was tried find & remove uncorrect tags using service: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.
I am don't understand what someone else looking for me. Thankyou for lecture.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-24 19:24:20+00:00): From the description, I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203754068/history is not a studio in the "amenity=studio" sense at all.
hribian (2015-02-12 21:33:07+00:00): Falschen Straßennamen korrigiert
pjhooker (2015-03-05 21:10:58+00:00): ;-)
*Martin* (2015-02-13 08:53:07+00:00): Inac nemusel so ten objazd zmazat a znovu nakreslit. Stacilo ho pretagovat.
*Martin* (2015-02-13 08:51:38+00:00): Tomas, nazov tohoto kruhaca isto nie je "Planovany kruhovy objazd". Ak mu das junction=roundabout tak spolu s highway=proposed samo o sebe znamena ze to je planovany kruhovy objazd. Thag name sa pouziva pre vlastne podstatne mena, nie na vseobecne a ani na popis. Ak je nutne niekde dat _doplnujuci_ popis, teda udak ktory nie je zrejmy s ostatnych tagov, tak sa dava do tagu description.

Stale nepomenuvas zmeny, prosim zacni.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-12 23:22:00+00:00): kolega popsuł granicę: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4258234
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-13 07:34:27+00:00): przy okazji kilka uwaga:
nie sklejamy obszarów z drogami. Ogólnie jest zasada, że nie skleja się różnych typów danych, czyli np. nie sklejamy obszarów z drogami, dróg z granicami administracyjnymi, granic administracyjnych z drogami itd.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-23 19:50:19+00:00): What are the opening hours of this bicycle repair station?  Is it outdoors?  Free?
rrrrrice (2015-02-12 23:21:35+00:00): pool
GerdP (2015-11-11 15:27:13+00:00): please review:
I've removed the meaningless
oneway="-1;yes;no"
from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218444706
It was produce by your merging of different
parts. Please change it of the way is a oneway.
changchun_1 (2015-12-10 15:33:57+00:00): Hallo SLÅ_NOK,
hier gibt es ein Note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/443250
wo auf eine illegale Datenquelle hinweißt. Der POI ist von dir. Datenquelle bitte im Kommentar oder POI mit angeben.
Gruß 
changchun_1
lxbarth (2015-02-13 20:12:30+00:00): Hey there, welcome to OSM! I'm seeing your traces don't have tags. Take a look at http://learnosm.org/ to get started mapping and make sure there are classifications to your geometry! Cheers :)
lxbarth (2015-02-13 20:17:22+00:00): I applied some fixes, check them out here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28829370
waldhans (2015-02-13 13:25:44+00:00): why did you remove the name "Alter Munitionsbahnhof"? and the station should be marked "disused=yes" or "historic=station_site". Now there seems to be an active, unnamed bus stop in the woods!
physi_retired (2015-02-13 14:09:51+00:00): ok, corrected...
Rub21 (2017-09-21 20:06:03+00:00): Hey Seanbasti, I have been looking this Changeset and there are removed  main roads, also I have been looking in  about  a king Abdul Aziz road which is in construction,  http://www.architecture-studio.fr/en/projects/lmc1/king_abdul_aziz_road_masterplan.htmlI am not sure what is the status of the project , however could we add the constructions roads there? I could not find any source to add those, maybe you know. 

Thank you.
Seandebasti (2017-11-16 04:01:22+00:00): hey this road you are talking about is located in makkah not in Riad
Seandebasti (2017-11-16 04:02:08+00:00): I dont know which concstructed oads you are meaning
715371 (2015-05-12 15:35:17+00:00): Hi, I disagree to tag roundabouts as highway=trunk. It is like a crossing: You gonna have to stop, if there is a car on the road - which is the usual case. I am undecided about the road in between the two roundabouts, because its still built without any crossings. We may see.
Mammi71 (2016-06-22 21:34:38+00:00): Hallo Jenseblume, gibt es einen Grund für die Verwendung von scrub im Bereich der Dünen Zingst? Die teils künstlich aufgespülte Düne ist grasbewachsen, von Buschland weit und breit keine Spur.
Jenseblume (2016-06-22 21:52:47+00:00): Hallo,
da passt Heide besser? Hab das an einer Stelle mal so gemappt.
Viele Grüße
Polarbear (2015-02-20 15:20:31+00:00): Aus welcher Quelle stammen denn die eingetragenen Informationen quer durch die Welt, insbesondere die koreanischen Bushaltestellen und Polizeistationen sowie das südafrikanische Restaurant?
Omegatherion (2015-02-13 16:30:11+00:00): Dort befindet sich kein Flughafen. Bitte achte darauf, dass deine Änderungen korrekt sind.
StefanB (2015-02-13 14:19:55+00:00): Pozdravljen!

Daj prosim poglej sistematični načrt uvoza RABA podatkov:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slovenia_Landcover_Import_-_RABA-KGZ
Vabljen k sodelovanju!
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27289

lp,
Štefan
malenki (2016-01-08 15:03:37+00:00): Personenbezogene Daten haben in OSM nichts zu suchen –> gelöscht
GOwin (2015-02-15 00:34:06+00:00): does CAP refer to College Assurance Plan?

If so, the node could be  appropriately tagged as:
office=insurance

See here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
a_joemar (2015-02-15 01:52:04+00:00): Hi, yup that's correct. I might have accidentally move the icon of CAP. However, that  doesn't operate for more than 10 years, due to losses. But still the building is still there. 
Thank you
a_joemar (2015-02-15 01:53:45+00:00): Also,  that PCI bank is  now UCPB.
GOwin (2015-02-15 02:14:25+00:00): I updated the POI to demonstrate what you can do. I used the original node (point) you made  to create you can trace a closed way (polygon) over the outline of the building, and add additional details where possible.

Normally, nodes are used to indicate the approximate location of a POI. If satellite imagery is available, and shows the structure, it is recommended to trace them instead.

Keep it up!
a_joemar (2015-02-16 02:05:39+00:00): thank you
a_joemar (2015-02-16 02:14:11+00:00): By the way, i don't know if this a right place to place my topic.. re changing/modifying of old POI in respect of old/ previous contributors. or i might need permission from them or from the admin? for instance the old provincial jail is now a shopping mall that is under construction.
thank you
GOwin (2015-02-16 07:13:10+00:00): 1. Many people keep in touch by the mailing list: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph or thru FB: http://fb.com/OSMPH. You can use Filipino or English in those channels. Questions here may not get immediate attention.

2. One thing to remember with OSM is "map what's on the ground". If the old POIs are no longer applicable you can delete them or use the "disused" tag. See more about this tag here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused . There is no need to ask for permission, OSM trust users to know what they're doing ;)  If in doubt, check the Wiki pages, or ask the question in the community channels.

If an area is in construction, you mark it as:
landuse=construction.

Another method I found helpful when starting with OSM is to check out the edits (tagsm in particular) made by other people.
a_joemar (2015-02-16 08:32:55+00:00): hi,
thanks for  advice, anyway, i tried mo record my GPX file via OSMAnd apps for the new access route and i uploaded the file. it seems it was a success.but when will i expect the posting of the new route? 
thanks
GOwin (2015-02-16 10:31:25+00:00): GPX tracks don't automatically turn into a way. Instead, it's used to trace a way/line.

Using the iD editor, it's a simple drag and drop operation. Details here: http://learnosm.org/en/editing/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
GOwin (2015-02-16 12:23:34+00:00): By the way, your trace was indeed uploaded: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/a_joemar/traces/1882004
a_joemar (2015-02-17 02:46:38+00:00): thank you. i'll give it a try
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 09:00:19+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=bistrot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3347595655/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=bistro
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
rm_ (2025-05-04 20:12:01+00:00): Fixed, need to check the place is still there though
SomeoneElse (2015-10-21 10:56:05+00:00): Just checking - are you sure that "Tan y Craig" and "Sgwâr Victoria" join here?  The Bing imagery's in shadow so you can't really see from that.  The OS OpenData "StreetView" data suggests that they don't join.  I presume that someone contacted Mapbox and said "these roads really do join"?
ruthmaben (2015-10-26 13:12:10+00:00): Thank you for highlighting this SomeoneElse. I have reverted the changes and added a note to check if they can be joined.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-14 10:43:02+00:00): Proszę o dodawanie nazwy ulicy i miejscowości do adresów. Sam numerek to za mało.
Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 11:18:54+00:00): Hi - perhaps something that might help here is to contact the person who changed this back from a highway=proposed to a highway=tertiary?  They're a new OSM mapper and so it might not be an "edit war" at all - it might just be that they didn't understand "why the roundabout that they tried to add didn't appear as they expected".  

There's probably a whole conversation to be had about why mapping something as "highway=tertiary" with a name of "Planned Roundabout" is a bad idea. Much of OpenStreetMap isn't obvious - and sometimes we forget that we were all new mappers ones.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-15 11:21:53+00:00): Hi
User: *Martin* contacted him in this matter...
Cheers
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 11:57:20+00:00): Thanks - did anyone hear anything back?  Maybe it might be worth trying to contact someone in the Slovakian community?  (I'm afraid that I don't know their regular contact mechanism - list, forum or whatever).
rm_ (2015-02-13 10:19:55+00:00): Aggiunto Ristorante Sommelier :)
Dark Man (2015-02-13 10:26:20+00:00): koniec remontu, doszła osobna nitka ulicy
kayle (2015-02-13 10:51:35+00:00): Ahoj, kludne zmaz cely bod ked je obchod zruseny. Nemusis nechavat shop=zrusene
SomeoneElse (2015-11-13 23:47:48+00:00): Just checking - are you sure that the footpath joins the road at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/765266220 ?  The Bing imagery suggests there might be a wall between them.
ruthmaben (2015-12-18 11:00:24+00:00): Thank you for highlighting this SomeoneElse. I have reverted the changes. Seems like there already is a note placed by you to check on the connectivity options.
MCDA (2015-02-17 21:00:23+00:00): Again, you are removing tags for a valid townland.  This change-set should be reverted.