piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ottwiz (2020-10-31 13:27:39+00:00): Hello, just I want you to take notice about Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta's age, it's around at least 9-10 years old ore more, there are many proofs. Some power plants around Moundsville have been demolished a few years ago, news have written some stuff about it, and also Wikipedia has an article about the R. E. Burger Power Plant.

 Please don't delete stuff that has only not existed on one aerial imagery.
I use Maxar aerial imagery because that's around 3-4 years old of age, and also you can check stuff with the Natural Agricultural Imagery Program's imagery.

Thank you very much that you read this.
You can add stuff, just don't remove, check multiple imageries like Bing or Maxar or Mapbox or USGS or NAIP before doing anything. I have to draw back some of the roads you deleted because they exist.
Also, i had been told that the NAIP imagery is usually not older than 3 years.
ottwiz (2020-10-31 13:33:05+00:00): Just taking into consideration, I drew up lot of roads here and the forests that you see on the map was drawn by me. I first used Esri, but I've been told  that's old, even if it's very clear. I suggest you to use Esri as just a reference but not as an actual imagery. Maxar and NAIP/USGS imagery are the references here, and maybe OSIP if you can get access to it. OSIP is the Ohio Statewide Imagery Program which maps the entire Ohio but some parts of the imagery covers the western border of WV.
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:05:51+00:00): #BTE
user_5359 (2020-10-30 05:05:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the booth overlapping building https://www.osm.org/way/864003404 and https://www.osm.org/way/865091396. 
Do you want this to indicate that the third floor of the building is not used as the library? IIf marking as a dot is not sufficient, I would recommend marking the smaller building with building:part instead of building.
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:05:36+00:00): #BTE
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:05:29+00:00): #BTE
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:05:22+00:00): #BTE
Rainero (2020-10-31 18:11:16+00:00): Hallo Hugin6,
der Frischemarkt Friedrichsen ist aber irgendwie an der falschen Stelle gelandet. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698308221 ist nicht die Poststraße und nicht der Ort Ladelund.
An der vermutlich richtigen Stelle gibt's den Supermarkt schon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5760541554
D.h. Dein Eintrag sollte gelöscht werden, oder?

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
aweech (2020-10-30 14:00:46+00:00): Just an FYI, I removed these crossings because they were removed in the big construction project a few years ago (the Bing imagery is from like 2011 and is way out of date). Thank you for your contributions in Concord!
skquinn (2020-10-30 14:23:10+00:00): Oops. I was under the impression Bing had been updated nationwide/worldwide; apparently it's only in some areas like Houston. What is the most up-to-date imagery for the area?
aweech (2020-10-30 17:52:14+00:00): I wish they would update Bing here, but I'm glad we get some high resolution imagery, even if it's almost 10 years old. In most of the area around here, Esri is newest.
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:05:15+00:00): #BTE
Reeniz (2020-10-30 03:55:23+00:00): 80% es subjetivo. Y el nombre ya estaba incluido. No haga vandalismo por favor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93262990
SomeoneElse (2020-11-15 12:43:12+00:00): Hello Reeniz,
Can you explain in a bit more detail exactly what the problem is here?  Explain what is mapped incorrectly, and how it should be mapped.  The user who made this edit has only made 15 edits in OpenStreetMap, so it makes sense to explain the different sort of name tags that OpenStreetMap has.  Actually, of the 3 names here it is "Plaza Italia" that I don't understand.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-15 12:43:30+00:00): Hola Reeniz,
¿Puede explicar con un poco más de detalle cuál es exactamente el problema aquí? Explique qué está mapeado incorrectamente y cómo se debe mapear. El usuario que realizó esta edición solo ha realizado 15 ediciones en OpenStreetMap, por lo que tiene sentido explicar los diferentes tipos de etiquetas de nombre que tiene OpenStreetMap. En realidad, de los 3 nombres aquí es "Plaza Italia" que no entiendo.
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
Reeniz (2020-11-15 12:54:52+00:00): Hola Andy. Despues del "estallido social" a la Plaza Baquedano/Italia se le empezo a popularizar el nombre de "Plaza de la Dignidad" por ser un lugar de concentracion de distintas manifestaciones y desde entonces esta plaza es concida por 3 nombres distintos. 
Es un poco largo de explicar, pero le dejo wikipedia: https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaza_Baquedano

El cambio lo reverti porque le cambio nombre a varias cosas mal intensionadamente como la estatua y carreteras.

Saludos
SomeoneElse (2020-11-15 13:07:03+00:00): Yes, I understand the background to the name changes.  as well as seeing it happen in OpenStreetMap, it actually made the international news in the UK.  See e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51628295 (which actually uses the name "Plaza de la Dignidad" without explaining it - arguably a mistake by the BBC).
What I was saying wasn't actually to do with that at all - it was to suggest that when you're commenting on the changeset of a user who as only made 15 edits it helps to explain what name tags are available and what they mean.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-11-15 13:07:25+00:00): Sí, entiendo el trasfondo de los cambios de nombre. además de verlo suceder en OpenStreetMap, fue noticia internacional en el Reino Unido. Ver p. Ej. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51628295 (que en realidad usa el nombre "Plaza de la Dignidad" sin explicarlo, posiblemente un error de la BBC).
Lo que estaba diciendo en realidad no tenía nada que ver con eso, era para sugerir que cuando comentas sobre el conjunto de cambios de un usuario que solo realizó 15 ediciones, ayuda a explicar qué etiquetas de nombre están disponibles y qué significan. .
Atentamente,
Andy
NonzeroShip (2020-10-30 03:04:56+00:00): #BTE
mariotomo (2020-11-03 17:16:37+00:00): debo comentarte a este también.  te he señalado al DWG por estar produciendo basura, y van a necesitar ver a qué me refiero.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:25:47+00:00): Saludos revisare la basura que me señalas, gracias.
mariotomo (2021-07-20 13:31:05+00:00): todavía faltan unos por borrar o mejorar.  todas correcciones fueron por otros maperos.
frosm (2020-10-30 13:50:39+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
vous avez renseigné 50m pour une maison de 1 niveau https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865196739 c'est beaucoup :)
par ailleurs, les noms dans osm, sont des noms réel. camps de banane par exemple n'est pas un nom, c'est une description, que vous avez d'ailleurs parfaitement décrit avec les autres attributs.
Bonne continuation
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
tastrax (2020-11-10 01:15:45+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
GrahR (2020-11-10 06:09:19+00:00): Thanks tastrax for your help. I am in the process of updating the Crows Nest Qld map. When I stared a month or so ago, it was obvious that it had been done by someone who did not have a personal knowledge of the town. I am gradually updating entry by entry, and making a few mistakes on the way as I am new to OSM. I am a hopeless typist, so some of the incorrect entries will have been typos. Regards
Grahame Rogers
tastrax (2020-11-10 06:31:48+00:00): No worries at all Grahame - great to have a local on board - they always make the best mappers! Most numbers just had +061 instead of +61so it was an easy fix - I updated quite a few in the area. Keep up the good work.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Frans S (2020-10-31 11:44:39+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Please map more accurate and square your rectangular buildings.
In a building with sloping roofs it looks like the imagery that there is a kink in the middle. This is caused by the angle at which the image is made. These roofs are usually strictly rectangular. The shadow of a building should not be included in the mapping. 

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2020-11-02 05:55:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please.
aharvey (2020-10-30 10:03:31+00:00): I'll point out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in which you may or may not have seen, and to quote "The is_in tag pre-dates boundary polygons. When a region has a well developed set of boundary polygons the information that could be placed in the is_in tag on an object can usually be derived from the boundaries that contain it, in which case the information in the tag seems redundant. Some contributors have advocated deleting this tag because they see it as equivalent to the boundary information. Other contributors consider that view to be short-sighted at best."

My view is this is redundant because the data is already implied by this being geographically within the NSW relation, and it's a waste of effort to tag every single feature in NSW like this when it can easily be determined.
patelmm79 (2020-10-30 16:28:47+00:00): I've seen and used that key in a few circumstances, particularly when the path to trying to fix the state information is not obvious...sometimes it's fairly obvious why the information isn't there (usually due to an intermediary later not having the correct information), but doign that diagnosis not always possible. 

I am very happy to participate in any effort that cleanses the data scalably.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2020-11-03 05:33:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/865217762: What is the meaning of the tag "9:32"="AM"?
VLD253 (2020-11-04 12:59:41+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for bringing it to our notice! I have fixed the error. Thank you 🙂 

Regards,
Ajay
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Miguel Pedr (2020-12-13 11:18:42+00:00): Hola,
Aquí las direcciones dadas son incorrectas y también dar direcciones incorrectas afectará la ruta o la navegación. Tenga cuidado al asignar unidireccional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93268321
CowlesBog (2020-12-15 03:18:19+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, I originally added this oneway direction with respect to the oneway sign seen in this Mapillary image: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/kXhQJwZ18Tb8CzY7LBnWTA. But, I can see that the car that took this image is traveling the opposite direction, which is contradictory. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and making the fix here. 
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, originalmente agregué esta dirección de sentido único con respecto al letrero de sentido único que se ve en esta imagen de Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/kXhQJwZ18Tb8CzY7LBnWTA. Pero puedo ver que el automóvil que tomó esta imagen viaja en la dirección opuesta, lo cual es contradictorio. Gracias por avisarme de esto y arreglarlo aquí.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:07:51+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
!bm (2020-10-30 13:17:41+00:00): Hallo StefanHRT,

FYI: Die US-Mutter wird wohl kaum direkt in DE aktiv sein. Wieso du das änderst, wenn korrekte/existente Wikidata-Einträge bestehen, erschließt sich mir nur teilweise. Vermutlich blind iD vertraut? Tja, besser nicht!

Zurückgeändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93292826

--besteGrüße!bm
StefanHRT (2020-10-30 13:38:08+00:00): Hallo bm,
Hier hatte OSM tatsächlich gemeint, das etwas nicht stimmt und selbst eine Aktualisierung vorgeschlagen, Sorry.
VG Stefan
StefanHRT (2020-10-30 13:40:32+00:00): Weil wir gerade bei Wikidata sind, mir ist aufgefallen das Rewe dort anders geschrieben ist als die eigentliche Marke (REWE-->alles groß), müsste das nicht in der Wikidata angepasst werden? Ist nur Interessehalber, ich habe nicht vor das dort zu ändern.
Gruß Stefan
!bm (2020-10-30 16:37:02+00:00): Das ist nicht "OSM", sondern der bescheidene Standard-Editor iD. Bitte den Fehlermeldungen/Hinweisen und Nötigungen desselben nicht blind vertrauen/durchführen!
(Wikidata/...: REWE schreibt sich so, nur gibt es bei OSM andere Regeln bezüglich Großschreibung. K.A. ob das einheitlich ist.)
--bg!bm
StefanHRT (2020-10-30 17:13:12+00:00): alles klar, weis bescheid ;)
ralley (2020-10-30 07:01:28+00:00): Mapping driveways in OSM is perfectly acceptable and common place, as per the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway and the 8 million plus already in OSML https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway.  Please revert this mass deletion/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93270316
4004 (2020-11-09 00:15:29+00:00): спартак назад поменяйте (confectionary)
4004 (2020-11-09 00:16:57+00:00): мелкие магазины у вас опять супермаркеты
user_2066394 (2020-10-30 10:12:13+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
eggie (2020-10-30 09:14:08+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


Review.. Graag de BAG info (Kadaster) intact laten.
Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM .. Maak altijd een combinatie met de aard van het bedrijf. Zie wiki.. 
shop=?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-30 10:38:24+00:00): shop tag toegevoegd..
Lokai (2020-10-30 10:34:40+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.

Schön, dass du die Daten verbesserst. Wenn Gleise abgebaut wurden, dann gibt es extra tags dafür.Schau bitte im wiki nach.

Gebäude, die rechtwinklig sind kannst du per shortcut so machen.

Verleiche bing luftbilder bitte mit esri. Bing kann recht ungenau sein.

Gruß

W.
Guselmur (2020-10-30 13:06:35+00:00): Hallo,
ja das habe ich mittlerweile gefunden, sorry. Wie stelle ich den die Gleise die ich jetzt gelöscht habe wieder her? Ich denke neu zeichnen ist nicht der richtige Weg. 
Kleiner Commits sind vermutlich schöner.

Danke und Gruß
G
q_un_go (2020-10-30 19:52:32+00:00): Das ist so etwas arg unglücklich getaggt:
Das gesamte Areal ist der Spritshop
die Adresse geht extra:
addr:street, addr:postcode, addr:city etc und sind nicht Teile des Namens.
R0bst3r (2020-11-03 07:45:10+00:00): Hallo smariek,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93275748
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:54:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93276599
nicolaymitropolsky (2021-07-19 16:21:04+00:00): Здравствуйте! wilderness_hut посреди СНТ? выглядит как какая-то ошибка. Вы уверены что там есть дом, в котором может жить кто угодно? Если так, кто как его найти?
FrankOverman (2020-10-30 16:28:16+00:00): Goed bezig geweest ;)
eggie (2020-10-30 17:54:16+00:00): Yep...was eigenlijk bezig een startende mapper te helpen in het centrum. Hier verandert zoveel.. of de nieuwe parkeerplaats al open is voor het dolfinarium.. geen idee.
Gr eggie
FrankOverman (2020-10-30 18:49:22+00:00): Ik had hier gister nog eea aangepast vanuit BAG, maar dat heb je vast wel gezien ;)
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:32:15+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of highway, access=no and path tags. Added track agricultural to the ways as this is what they appear to be. Tweaked the track and area lines to reflect Bing images. It may be that there is also some access to fishing areas.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:07:55+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated section of highway then tagged the ways as service roads for allotments.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:51:07+00:00): Amended track names and status.
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:59:08+00:00): Hi, I've amended the track, path and old railway tagging, (removed duplicate rail line).

Regards Bernard.
syntex (2020-11-01 14:05:05+00:00): Is this tag really correct? The aeroway stopped rendering on the map
Claudius Henrichs (2020-11-04 15:12:56+00:00): Indeed stopways and runway displaced threshold elements are currently not rendered.

I am about to submit a tagging proposal around stopways and displaced_thresholds and based on that will work on getting the carto style on openstreetmap.org updated. The previous data tagging was incorrect as it suggested stopways were parts of the runway which they are not. This leads to misinterpretations e.g. about runway lengths.
Claudius Henrichs (2020-11-11 08:58:26+00:00): I have just started a draft for a tagging proposal to tag both stopways/blast pads and displaced thresholds. I would appreciate if you would find the time to review and share your feedback:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/aeroway%3Dstopway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/aeroway%3Ddisplaced_threshold

On the stopway proposal discussion page there's already a discussion around whether to use the runway=* sub-tag scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/aeroway%3Dstopway

Looking forward to hear your point of view and work towards creating a good proposal to present the wider OSM mapper audience.
naveenpf (2020-10-30 14:59:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93278414
eggie (2020-10-30 09:16:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 18:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106604898 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some dubious edits (including inappropriate trunk roads) in Spain.
user_5359 (2020-11-01 05:59:04+00:00): Hello! Please check the node http://www.osm.org/node/6574864032 . What ist the meaning of the tag?