piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2021-05-06 20:29:17+00:00): Hej, har bytt lite varstans  "path" i kombination med foot/bicycle=designated till cycleway utan att du motiverar varför du ändrar helt valida taggningar och i stor stil; nästan som en tjuv i natten. Varför gör du detta?
Ahtojää (2021-05-06 21:43:14+00:00): Hej! Jag gjorde ändringen i samband med ett antal andra ändringar. Tolkar jag OSM wiki korrekt så är highway=cycleway lämpligare till den här typen av stigar då den är mer precis medan highway=path är mer öppen markering av sin definition. Highway=cycleway är också vanligare i kartläggningen i Sverige och andra länder vad jag har sett.

Huvudsyftet i mina ändringar var inte det du nu nämner men det kom vid sidan. Framförallt lade jag till saknade enkelriktningarna, beläggning osv.
archie (2021-05-06 23:13:23+00:00): Jag förstår inte ditt resonemang. På vilket sätt skulle "cycleway" vara lämpligare? Och på vilket sätt är "path" mera "öppen"? Varför valde du cycleway och inte footway (även om jag tycker även det vore fel, så ligger det mera rim o reson i det eftersom det flesta kan använda dessa vägar per fot, men inte alla per cykel), förresten? Det du skriver ger ingen mening. Jag misstänker att du har en preferens för "cycleway" och därför ändrar rätt taggade vägar till det. En utsökning - dock ej vetenskaplig - ger vid handen att den ursprungliga taggningen med "path" är det vanliga i Sverige; detta givetvis i kombination med foot/bicycle=designated. Vi talar här alltså om vägbanor som kan nyttjas av både fotgängare och cyklister.
henkmet (2021-04-22 01:58:26+00:00): Hi. You added a trunk road at the Federal Highway, exit to University. This trunk road has been removed as they're reconstructing the intersection. I have removed it fromthe map again. (changeset #103370237)
eggie (2021-03-28 16:53:51+00:00): Dag Overloon.. In OSM taggen bij op de bestaande adresnodes.
Dus niet zelf adressen aanmaken.
Het restaurant lag buiten het gebouw. Ik heb het samengevoegd met adresnode nr 2
Elk begin is moeilijk.
MVG
eggie
Kachkaev (2021-03-29 20:48:49+00:00): Вижу один и тот же адрес у нескольких зданий (дом номер 2, там где Лист). Возможно, имеет смысл несколько зданий (building) переделать в building:part, убрать оттуда адрес, а вокруг нарисовать один общий building и присвоить адрес ему. Если несколько building:part имеют одну и те же характеристики, то их можно объединить в один building:part тоже 🙂
Kachkaev (2021-03-29 20:52:29+00:00): Похожая ситуация и домов 2...8 по проспекту победы. Там у каждого 9 этажей и одноэтажный пристрой с магазином или библиотекой. Одно здание → один way с тэгом building:yes (или более точным) + два контура с тэгом building:part=yes (уже без адреса). Детали тут в вики:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Простые_3D_здания

Можно ещё в качестве примера посмотреть на школы и жилые дома в Арбекова, которые делал Slava_x 👀
sovereign_ch (2021-03-29 05:34:15+00:00): War zwar gut gemeint, trotzdem erfolgt der Endhalt der N54 an der alten Haltestelle, da die Fahrzeuge danach nach Norden (Bülach bzw. Garage Winkel) fahren. Habe die betreffenden Elemente ensprechend wiederhergestellt.
VictorIE (2021-04-09 20:04:04+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6205189#map=15/52.2095/-10.3223 Just be careful with Logainm. Civil parishes and townlands with the same name have different reference numbers, but are often presented on the same page.
gsommer (2021-04-09 23:08:22+00:00): Thank you very much for the warning! So I got 1104, the parish, by mistake and you have corrected it now?

I was wondering, why most townlands on the Dingle Peninsula already had the Irish name, the link and reference number. I suspected it was done automatically for all Ireland until I discovered the missing ones on the peninsula and that there is much less of this information available in the rest of Kerry/Ireland.

Maybe you know more about this? I have completed the Dingle Peninsula now, hopefully with not too many mistakes. But it should be theoretically possible to automatically add the Irish name and links where it is missing using the JSON download of logainm.ie. I admit I have not looked into this in detail yet. Just an idea.

Kind Regards,
Gerhard
VictorIE (2021-04-10 07:46:32+00:00): Hi, 

Yes, I fixed this one and about 5 others around the country. I made one of the mistakes myself. :)

I do maintenance of the Logainm tags. Both OSM and Logainm are active projects, that are expanding all the time. OSM has about 50,000 objects tagged with logainm:ref=* and logainm:url=* There are about 120,000 objects on Logainm, although there are about 1% duplicates there. They have at least 20,000 more to document and OSM is adding to that list.

Most name=* tags in this area are  in Irish as it is a designated Gaeltacht area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaeltacht

We try to add name=*, name:en=* and name:ga=* for every location in Ireland. There are some objects with other languages also.

A few years ago there was a large project to map every place name in Ireland that led to https://www.townlands.ie/ I think this used at least some automation. The problem is where two or more locations have the same name. Sometimes dozens of locations share a name.
gsommer (2021-04-27 14:49:20+00:00): Hi Victor,

sorry for the late reply (I was too busy outdoors). Thank you for this interesting information.

The Corcaguiny barony should be complete, also with name:en, except for any more mistakes maybe :-).

Would it be possible to point me to the right contacts of the projects you mentioned? I would like to contribute and will have to learn more for this.

I think I could create a JOSM changeset to update townlands using the location point stored in the logainm data, which should resolve most ambiguity. But this should be discussed with the proper people and I would have to get more knowledge about the different projects. I think it should be possible to double-check the changeset before it is applied and I could do a prototype first (the Iveragh barony for example, where a lot is missing currently).

I have done such things before while working for the GIS department of the City of Vienna (though not with OpenSource tools and so this will be a learning process), but have retired in Ireland now. It would not happen fast as I prefer being outdoors instead of behind a computer :-).

Kind Regards,
Gerhard
VictorIE (2021-04-27 15:29:46+00:00): You can contact Logainm at logainm@dcu.ie

https://www.townlands.ie/ is run by the Irish OSM community https://www.openstreetmap.ie/contact/
VictorIE (2024-01-21 17:29:44+00:00): Ringfort? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923120283
b-unicycling (2024-01-21 17:35:21+00:00): No, "ecclesiastical enclosure". Just go with "enclosure", I'd say. And sub-categorize (enclosure=ecclesiastic), if you like, but there is no convention for it yet. You can do whatever you like, basically, just don't map it as a ringfort.
eggie (2021-03-28 16:51:40+00:00): Hier lag het wandelpad los van d'n Hof
Ik heb het verbonden.
Of ontbreekt echt een stukje in werkelijkheid?

MVG
eggie
Overloon (2021-03-28 19:05:03+00:00): nee klopt het ligt aan elkaar vast. 
Groetjes Overloon
eggie (2021-03-28 19:10:26+00:00): Kijk eens naar  
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Die heeft een goede validator en zo haal ik ook de 'fouten'' er uit.
Gr eggie
abakus_uploader (2021-03-28 22:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AntEntro (2021-03-28 15:49:25+00:00): 写错了，是昌宁。
eggie (2021-03-28 16:55:14+00:00): Ter info Hier is het fout gegaan met de routerelaties
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101878792
Toets eens op het vinkje van load relations ter leering ende vermaeck
timmito (2021-03-28 16:10:17+00:00): Hallo Micha12 und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Warum wurde der Weg gelöscht? Bei OSM gilt das Prinzip Map what's on the ground. Wenn ein Weg vorhanden ist, dann sollte dieser auch eingetragen sein. Die Zugangsbeschränkung access=private war ja bereits attributiert.
Micha12 (2021-03-28 16:19:25+00:00): Guten Tag, 
Dies ist kein Weg oder Straße, das ist der Hof eines Landwirtschaftlichen Betriebes.
In der Map sieht das aus wie ein Weg, in der Realität leider nicht.

Jedoch kann ich gerne wieder den Weg erstellen, mit access=private.

Viele Grüße
timmito (2021-03-28 16:28:20+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Da ich nicht vor Ort war kann ich das nicht einschätzen. Das kannst du gerne entscheiden. Prinzipiell ist highway=service auch für die Zufahrt zu z.B. einem Hof gedacht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
eggie (2021-03-28 16:27:13+00:00): Beste Overloon.. Houd je wel rekening met de routerelaties die hier lopen?
MVG
eggie
Supaplex (2021-03-28 17:13:15+00:00): 目前在台灣，基石與山頂是分開標示的。然後敘述性的部分宜放在 description 那邊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101879146
rthik007 (2021-04-01 12:09:08+00:00): Hi sebastic, fixed the alignment based on the imagery Kindly refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102124856.. thank you..
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101879177
sebastic (2021-04-01 13:04:49+00:00): That should be fine if the broken polygons have not been reintroduced.
attili1 (2021-04-05 08:58:30+00:00): HI Sebastic,
There was a kink which is a sharp angle on an intersection of the highway before, refer https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TOHOB8z6KJI/YGqssV9xaFI/AAAAAAAAGbQ/zrGQbrhb_tsG6cqg2-cc5gGP_eQfZWN6QCK8BGAsYHg/s0/2021-04-04.png?authuser=0 which is corrected now. Kindly refer to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102124856
sebastic (2021-04-05 09:23:02+00:00): You guys seem pretty active, perhaps you can keep an eye on broken polygons too.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=122.18701&lat=13.03025&zoom=6
http://area.jochentopf.com/
aweech (2021-03-28 17:22:25+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'm afraid that a natural wood is not an address. There's an address preset in the editor that shows the relevant fields. I changed the point to that preset and started to fill it in, and you can add in the zip code and the house number. I assume that 9000 East is the street name and Gusher is the city name, but, if those aren't correct, you can change them to the correct values.
hauke-stieler (2021-03-29 21:38:57+00:00): Hi,

habe den Namen vom Gülletank mal entfernt, ich glaube content=slurry passt da besser ;)

Grüße
Hauke
osmsh (2021-03-30 08:39:12+00:00): Slurry ist doch nur der englische Begriff für "Gülle".
Gruß, Klaus
hauke-stieler (2021-03-30 19:44:28+00:00): Exakt, deswegen passt das ja auch. Aber name=Gülle hat in OSM ja keinerlei Bedeutung außer, dass es auf der Karte angezeigt wird, was niemandem nützt, der Daten auswerten möchte. Außerdem mappen wir ja nicht für den Renderer ;)

Grüße
Hauke
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-03-30 08:03:13+00:00): Hallo Fippe,
kannst Du Deine Änderung begründen? Ich verstehe den Sinn nicht, getrennt erfasste Namen unter 'name' mit Bindestrich zusammenzufassen.
Gruß Roger Wilco
Fippe (2021-03-30 14:13:36+00:00): Hallo Roger Wilco, der Sinn ist, dass so nicht nur der deutschsprachige Name gerendert wird, sondern beide Namen, die auf dem Ortsschild stehen. In Belgien, der Lausitz und der Schweiz ist das bereits umgesetzt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-04-01 06:11:05+00:00): Hallo Fippe,
ich habe im OSM-Forum mal nachgefragt: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72381
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
ottwiz (2021-03-28 16:11:28+00:00): If you know a better tagging for Oglebay Park, because as discussed on OSMUS Slack, it doesn't really fit the leisure=park tagging, then tell me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-04 10:03:54+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale=-0
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167703573/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale=0-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
gscholz (2021-04-03 06:19:02+00:00): Hi Ernesto,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.13358&lat=21.27196&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-29 08:13:11+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Per favore, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
Stereo (2021-04-29 21:38:27+00:00): Ech erëm :)

Di "Impasse Saint-Antoine" mécht mech e besse geckeg, well ech näicht dozou fannen. Gëtt et tatsächlech e Passage op der Nordsäit fir eriwwer op d'Esplanade? Ass eng Borne fir de Wee an d'Foussgängerzone ze spären?

Ech sinn dovun ausgaangen, dass d'Nummer 8 an der Impasse a net an der Rue ass, an hunn d'Adresse vum Labo bäigesat. Sinn awer do net 100% sécher. Wees du méi?
user_3961358 (2021-04-30 07:17:06+00:00): Jo déi kléng Gaassen sin vill Aarbescht ;) Et war souwäit alles ok, Accèsen och. Misst lo méi däitlech sin.
Jrachi (2021-05-11 08:18:22+00:00): Ciao.
Csa significa: "Variante Intesezionale (C&P)"?
Roberto Novello (2021-05-11 10:26:16+00:00): é una variante che passa sotto la via di arrampicata "Intersezionale" , che è stata ripulita in occasione di una gara di MTB denominata Corri&Pedala (C&P)
Jrachi (2021-05-11 11:21:42+00:00): Se è stata una cosa temporanea non vedo la necessità di mettere un nome che non esiste.
Roberto Novello (2021-05-11 16:42:20+00:00): Non è una cosa temporanea. Il sentiero è tracciato e percorribile. Avendolo ripulito un paio di anni fa con la locale società sportiva, lo abbiamo segnalato e gli abbiamo dato un nome
Jrachi (2021-05-11 16:46:59+00:00): Quindi avete messo cartelli con quel nome?
Se si riferisce ad un percorso mtb il nome va messo con il tag specificao:
mtb:name=*
ivanbranco (2021-03-31 18:02:43+00:00): Ciao Carla,

macchia Mediterranea=Natura Mediterranea non è un tag valido.
NieWnen (2021-03-28 20:06:04+00:00): Hej, chciałbym powiedzieć tylko, że na OSM budynki mapujemy od podstawy, a nie od dachu. Jest specjalna warstwa, która zawiera obrysy budynków z której można skorzystać. W edytorze ID jest to "Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS".
hatul (2021-05-24 20:22:28+00:00): מה מטרת היחס הזה? נראה שהוא אוסף כמה קטעים לא קשורים.
גם השם מבלבל עם שביל השרון הרגלי.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11518999
phaerrax (2021-04-30 20:47:53+00:00): Ciao! Il tag "name" andrebbe riservato per i nomi ufficiali (più o meno) degli oggetti sulla mappa. La ciclabile in questione ha veramente questo nome, ad esempio indicato da un cartello stradale (io ricordo di no, ma magari è una modifica recente)?
user_3022894 (2021-03-28 19:34:48+00:00): Hi Jörg,
vielen Dank für das Hinzufügen des Waldweges! Allerdings habe ich eine Frage, und zwar, war es ein Versehen diese Waldfläche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923146893 zu erstellen? Ich meine, die Waldfläche als solche war ja vorher eig. bereits eingetragen.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
joel1972 (2021-03-28 19:58:38+00:00): Hi Lukas, 
wenn dann ist es ein Versehen. OSM wollte eine Fläche daraus machen. Es sind auch nur Wege, die durch die Fläche hindurchführen. Wenn Du es korrigierst, würde es mich sehr freuen. Vielen Dank fürs "Nachwischen". 
Schöne Grüße,
Jörg
Cristoffs (2021-03-28 19:43:02+00:00): Proszę opisuj dokładniej swoje zmiany.
Cristoffs (2021-04-01 18:14:31+00:00): Zweryfikowałem dodane atrybuty do Biedronki. Powinieneś najpierw przeczytać jak dodawać takie informacje na wiki. Poprawiłem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101883520
Matt McCutchen (2021-03-28 17:53:09+00:00): Concerns:
- In several cases, I entered turn:lanes with a number of lanes that does not match the "lanes" tag because additional lanes for turns begin shortly before the intersection, but I didn't know the exact place where they begin in order to split the way and update the "lanes" tag.  I hope this is OK: I think most consumers of the data will do something reasonable.
- Northbound Connecticut Avenue at Jones Bridge Road: I think it only makes sense for the rightmost lane to be "through;slight_right;right", but I couldn't confirm this by signage.
felipeeugenio (2023-06-11 22:46:50+00:00): Estimado. Por favor ojo con las ediciones. Pasó todos los caminos a leisure=track. y no se pudieron transitar por 2 años.
Saludos
Matt McCutchen (2021-03-28 18:07:29+00:00): turn:lanes:conditional seems to be very unofficial (in particular, I'm unsure how I'm supposed to protect the semicolon in the conditional value; I took a look at taginfo for prior art), but that's the fun of OpenStreetMap, right?  I'm having fun anyway.  If enough instances of turn:lanes:conditional are added, maybe routers will be motivated to learn to parse it.
SimonPoole (2022-06-09 17:18:26+00:00): Hallo, die Änderungen die du hier gemacht hast scheinen alle falsch zu sein, auf diesen Strassen war der Zugang für Motorfarhrzeuge schon auf den Zubringerdienst beschränkt alles andere ist falsch.
eggie (2021-04-04 13:42:51+00:00): Hi Joesep..

 Please describe the kind of attraction.
What was your intention?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-04 13:54:30+00:00): removed attraction.. not present
cpligovka_lyft (2021-04-06 09:07:14+00:00): Hello mneko,
My name is Catherine and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. While mapping in Seattle, I noticed that you added multiple barrier=kerb tags there. Some of them were applied at intersections of roads and footpaths or just at roads (like there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6252512487, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6208587575), which affects the routing. According to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb), combining barrier=kerb tag with highway=crossing is usually not preferred. According to Mapillary streetside there are no barriers at those nodes. So could you provide any additional information that this tag should be added in these cases? If not, could you please let us revert the edits in the changeset?
Thank you, Catherine
mneko (2021-04-06 12:03:26+00:00): I'm using the iD editor which is giving me a "Lowered Curb has incomplete tags" error when barrier isn't applied
cpligovka_lyft (2021-04-06 14:34:19+00:00): Hello mneko, 
Thank you for such a quick clarification! I understood that you are using a window  indicating an error at some object, but in cases  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6208587575, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6208587574  nodes are located at the crossings. It would probably be a better practice to combine kerb=lowered with highway=crossing and crossing=*type tags instead of barrier=kerb there to avoid any incomplete tags or issues. Do you mind if we will have these tags fixed according to the scheme above?
Thank you, Catherine
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-28 18:41:22+00:00): Upgrading tagging and fixing geometry errors on Washington's river system, as discussed on the OpenStreetmap US Slack, channel #local-washington-state and as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernization
MxxCon (2021-03-28 23:52:07+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this is an incorrect way to represent this business. You tagged the whole building as being this business. This is highly unlikely since I can see other businesses at this address too.
Additionally, this is not a location of a building with address on Park Avenue. You can not take just any random map object and mangle its data to add your business.
If you want to add your business, please do it by adding a POI node close to the primary entrance and include all the relevant details there.
As such, this edit is going to be reverted.
olt (2021-04-12 10:44:04+00:00): Hallo. Gibt es zu der Änderung eine Diskussion? name ist für die allgemeine Bezeichnung, und das wäre Buxtehude, Neu Wulmstorf, etc.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Glassman (2021-03-30 18:59:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM. FYI We spell out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you update the street? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Let me know if you ever need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101886044
EarthealthyGIS (2021-03-30 19:05:33+00:00): The reason I did it this way is all our roads/streets are NE, not Northeast. NE is the correct direction suffix. Do you still want me to change them. Actually all the streets in OSM for the City of Marysville/Arlington should be NE. Thoughts?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101886044
Glassman (2021-03-30 23:44:13+00:00): I agree, most cities in the US use just abbreviations not only for direction but also road type, like blvd, ln, dr, etc. 

Long before I started in OSM there was an agreement reached for no street abbreviations. The good news is that software can easily convert to NE.

When I first moved to Mount Vernon, I had a garmin navigation LCD. As we drove into the city, the unit happily announced "Welcome to Mountain Vernon."

Hope that helps.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-01 01:25:50+00:00): I see you removed the maxheight on the highway but that's one of the restrictions (as much as max speed). See https://www.maineturnpike.com/Business-With-MTA/Policies-Rules.aspx
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101886244
CharliePlett (2021-04-28 14:15:01+00:00): Ah yes, I see my mistake now. Thanks for pointing it out.
eggie (2021-03-28 19:21:01+00:00): Dag Reinier.. Je vraagt feedback
Oke..  Een correctie die nodig was.
Eigenlijk taggen we bedrijven tegenwoordig op de adresnode.
Je zou het kunnen overzetten met bv office=company. Het was al een tag van een voorgaande mapper zag ik.
MVG
eggie
Pictop (2021-03-28 19:06:55+00:00): Nicht Inn, sondern Donau
Patchanka (2021-03-30 10:10:29+00:00): bonjour
pour les arbres comme le magnolia que vous avez ajouté, le name ne doit pas indiquer l'espère de l'arbre mais son nom si l'arbre en a un (par exemple un arbre planté de manière symbolique pour commémorer un évènement ou autre chose... Exemple :"Arbre de la Paix")
Voir page du wiki sur les arbres : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Ici ce serait donc plutôt genus=Magnolia (le genre est souvent en latin mis pour le magnolia c'est le même mot que dans le langue courant en Français)
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnolia
Bobos-Seven (2021-03-30 11:15:22+00:00): Bonjour
Merci Beaucoup,
Changement fait
je cherchais a indiquer l'espèce pour une énigme locale
eggie (2021-03-28 19:22:42+00:00): Oke.. Dit is voldoende .. De naam kan  van de kas af en het telefoonnummer bijtaggen op de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Viajero Perdido (2021-03-28 20:12:12+00:00): Hi KBM.  It's funny; I just realized we're both editing the same area at the same time; in fact you added a trail I was meaning to.  :)

Could you let me know when you're done in the area?  I'd like to do a little fine-tuning on landcover, and don't want to collide.  Thanks, VP.