piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2023-02-03 22:51:04+00:00): Er hört nicht auf zu nerven: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Iimes11
Strubbl (2023-02-03 22:53:25+00:00): Vorsicht, das ist der Vandale, den ich verlinkt habe. Er nutzt Unicode-Zeichen, um den Nick aussehen zu lassen wie limes11
Strubbl (2023-02-03 22:55:06+00:00): Ach, übertrieben. Ist nur ein großes i statt dem L
Strubbl (2023-02-03 23:50:17+00:00): und https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alvvin auch gemeldet
map per (2023-02-04 06:48:05+00:00): Identitätsdiebstahl ist noch mal ein neues Level
Strubbl (2023-02-12 09:09:50+00:00): next: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Strubb%CE%99
map per (2023-02-12 11:24:19+00:00): Sieht so aus als hätte Michael seinen Vandalismus jetzt automatisiert...
opendcc (2023-02-12 14:58:55+00:00): Nun, vermutlich hat die Erstellung des Bots länger gedauert als die overpass-Abfrage. Export to pdf, ctrl-A, delete. Die Abfrage nach changesets eines User findet sich bei mir im Profil - für den Wiederholungsfall ...
DeFra85 (2022-06-28 19:46:35+00:00): Steht das Schild DE:250;1020-30 nicht direkt an der Haller Straße?
Der abzweigende kurze Waldweg zur Hausnummer 81 hat an der Ecke auch ein kleines gelbes Schild ausem Baumarkt á la "Privatweg, Zutritt verboten". Taggen wir sowas auch?
Muhmaker (2022-06-29 03:43:09+00:00): Ja das Schild steht an der Haller Straße. Deshalb habe ich das erste Stück von "In der Howe" als  vehicle=destination eingetragen. Das gelbe Schild habe ich auf die Straße "In der Howe" bezogen weil sich auch an dem Track von der Amshauser Straße ausgehend und an dem Track neben dem Teich etwas weiter westlich auch solche Schilder befinden. Beim kurzen Stück Waldweg an der Haller Straße war ich mir nicht sicher ob das auch gemeint war mit der Sperrung und habe es erstmal so gelassen. Ich denke schon, dass wir solche Verbote taggen sollten auch wenn die Schilder primitiv aussehen, da es eine eindeutige Willenserklärung des Eigentümers ist. Ob der dazu berechtigt ist eine Sperrung einzurichten können wir natürlich nicht so einfach klären. Das kann dann wohl nur eine Anfrage an die Stadtverwaltung und notfalls ein Gericht klären.
DeFra85 (2022-06-29 07:43:57+00:00): Ja stimmt, das besagte gelbe Schild ist wirklich uneindeutig positioniert. Und mit Bezug auf die anderen Schilder ist das auch stimmig.
Vielleicht frage ich mal bei der Gemeinde nach, weil einige Fußgänger und etliche Fahrradfahrer das kurze Stück (Amshausener<->Haller) nutzen ob die Beschilderung zulässig ist.
SHARCRASH (2022-05-19 19:16:48+00:00): The car traffic lights are not at the stop, they are at level of the crossing. In extra it complicates the data and eye visualisation (same info in different spots is worse than same info at the same spot).
Strubbl (2022-05-20 15:56:01+00:00): Hallo derconno, reicht das Licht von den Laternen von der ggü. Straßenseite nicht bis hierher?
SomeoneElse (2022-10-09 23:30:12+00:00): Oops, it looks like the hotel's website http://web.archive.org/web/20170826133157/http://www.tinto-house.co.uk/ expired and got replaced with a parking page.  You've updated the parking page to https :)
Mannivu (2022-05-23 11:59:16+00:00): Modifica perfetta, ma non ho capito dove hai aggiunto la fontanella (vedo che hai aggiunto una mappa informativa, ma nessuna fontanella).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121210895
JeroenHoek (2022-05-20 06:39:06+00:00): Ik snap wat je toe wil voegen, maar het lijkt me niet handig om er twee entiteiten van te maken met dezelfde naam. Ik heb het aangepast door er één multipolygon van te maken.
ConnorWong (2022-05-19 20:07:35+00:00): If Microsoft produces footprints like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061867263 – shall we really import them?
sis651 (2022-05-19 21:12:05+00:00): It's better to first import, then correct if no one will try to draw them in close future. :)
MS thing needs a lot of work to work well. Buildings are not correctly aligned etc. One is good, the other is turned to north etc... Buildings here are on top of each other, thus imagery is bad. AI can't handle these...
rab (2022-05-19 21:03:15+00:00): Hallo,
Die Verbindung von Flächen mit anderen Flächen ist in Ordnung.
Das Verbinden von Flächen mit Straßen oder anderen Linien ist keine gute Praxis.
otji73 (2022-05-20 18:57:13+00:00): Rab wrote: Hello, connecting surfaces to other surfaces is fine. Connecting surfaces with roads or other lines is not a good practice.

Hi Rab, the type error was only about the name of the school (not the area). However: that's right, where the school grounds border directly on the road, I have also connected the two. But only there. Nevertheless, thank you for pointing it out.
rab (2022-05-20 19:42:14+00:00): Hello otji73
I have already disconnected it.
I hope you don't mind. It's just to make the data more maintainable
user_5359 (2022-05-22 16:40:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1061871616, https://www.osm.org/way/1061909789, https://www.osm.org/way/1061909789
You upload this (and many other ways) two or three times (all with a typo in the key). I correct the typo, but please mark the cleanup of the duplicates (some ways are in relation, the duplicates not).
LU2EFI (2022-05-31 18:18:56+00:00): Hi! I suppose you are referring to "intermitent" instead of "intermittent": I've noted my error and corrected on all objects I had found. If not, please let me know. Thanks
ConnorWong (2022-05-19 20:28:54+00:00): Is this a joke? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121212066
Dhruv Hegde (2022-05-19 20:34:54+00:00): Oops, I fixed that huge thing
rjgambrel (2022-08-13 20:24:01+00:00): This changeset (looks like the last one you did this year) adds the Expressway tag to a part of a trunk highway. There is a Minnesota project on highway classification (which is part of a US wide project) that clarifies when the tag should be used. This stretch does not meet that criteria so I will be changing the tag to expressway=no. A link to the Minn project is: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification. Feel free to message me, comment in this discussion or join the discussion on slack.
SekeRob (2022-05-22 19:19:16+00:00): Hi,

This building / relation has some issues, the change set summary already showing 3 warning. Most importantly though, how did this building rise to layer=5 (somewhere floating in the stratosphere ;o). For sure, one roundish building overlaps the square building, likely needing redrawing of the square to follow the outline of the round and removing the layer=5 and tag the roundish 1 as layer=1

If you navigate in OSM Inspector in the Areas view to this location you see there are quite a few issues.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=11.33603&lat=44.520912&zoom=11

Just so you know, the intersection the easiest to fix. The problem results in no building rendering there at all.

Let me know if you need help

ciao
YjM (2023-08-08 23:30:36+00:00): Dear Houderl,

please, do NOT do this kind of armchair mapping again. All of the fords you have added to the map are fake. I had to delete them one by one. Such edits are not useful to the OSM and costs time other mappers fixing the errors (me in this case). I kindly ask you to not repeat such edits again.

Thank you and sincerely
 YjM
Houderl (2023-08-09 07:36:11+00:00): This path doesn´t exist!
YjM (2023-08-09 22:07:35+00:00): Dear Houderl, it is a misunderstanding. No specific path was problematic. The tags "ford=yes", you have added to literally every crossing between a highway and a waterway, were problematic, beacuse they were all fictional.

Sincerely
 YjM
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-21 08:46:12+00:00): Gal būtų galima nesegti kelių prie plotų (pvz. highway žymų prie landuse/aikštelių)? Apsunkina redagavimą ateityje...
Taip pat labai naudinga pažymėti aikštelės tipą (pvz. antžeminė aikštelė parking=surface, o  „P“ ženklas prie gatvės tėra parking=street_side).
Ačiū!
PovilasDew (2022-05-25 21:13:50+00:00): Kas dėl prisegimų, tai mažina taršą. Tomas buvo nepatenkintas, kad per daug linijų kartais prikuriu, nors neminėjo konkrečiai daugiabučių rajonų pievų. Kas liečia sulietas linijas, tai, jei reikia, aš laikinai beredaguojant atskiriu, paspaudęs ant jų, kad vienas iš jų aktyvuotųsi, tada spaudžiu ant pliuso ir sukuriu naują atskirą tašką, svarbu, kad pati linija būtų aktyvuota. Jei neaktyvuota, tai iš kart sukurs tašką abiem linijom ir ji liks suklijuota.

Dėl parkingo, tai pasistengsiu atsižvelgti :)
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-26 13:08:04+00:00): Dėl linijų segimo tai toks dalykas - arba tada reikia landuse pritempinėt iki takelio vidurio (dėl landuse tai dar galima gyvent, o kai parkingas metru-dviem paplatėja šaligatvio sąskaita, tai jau prasti popieriai), arba pats takelis gaunasi kur nors šone, ne realaus takelio vidury. Visa problema aišku gimsta iš plotį turinčio objekto (pėsčiųjų takelio) žymėjimo kaip linija, o tada jau ir prasideda interpretacijos. Šiaip prie automobilinių kelių Lietuvoje landuse nebesegam, tai sakyčiau ir prie kitų highway=* nesegti. Bet be kažkokio susitarimo Lietuvos mastu viskas ir telieka nuomone.
PovilasDew (2022-05-30 15:39:59+00:00): Aš irgi galvojau, kad nereikia segti, bet Tomas paminėjo, kad pėsčiųjų takai per siauri, geriau jei landuse eina per juos kiaurai. Tuo pačiu kyla minčių, kad gali ir landuse ribos praeiti pro takelius, pvz. vienoj pusėj pieva, kitoj miškas. Tik atsegti reikia mokėti.

Dėl parkingo pločio tai atsižvelgsiu, bet takelis, tai nežinau, svarbu būtų takelio pločio paklaidoje kiek įmanoma. Manau nėra problema laikyti kokią 4-5 m paklaidą žemėlapyje. Dažnu atveju kalbėtume apie iki 3 m atsirandančias paklaidas.

Taip pat pagalvojau, kad galim atsisakyti to parking_space. Realiai nedaug realybėj skiriasi nuo tiesiog parking, tokiose daugiabučių kiemuose naudoti kartu su parking=street_side, plius geriau matysis per pagr. OSM. Kas liečia parking_space, jį naudoti nebent tik pagal paskirtį, t.y. parking viduje, pažymint kur konkrečiai parkuojama, OSM įvadas leidžia kiekvieną smulkų parkavimo vietos stačiakampiuką pažymėti, jei turi gerą palydovo/ortofoto raišką. Galima ir keletą parkavimo vietų vienu parking space pažymėt, kaip yra dabar.
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-31 09:20:43+00:00): Dėl takelių, tai viskas priklauso kaip žymima - aš pažymėčiau takelio liniją per vidurį, ir tada tik segčiau plotus iš šonų -  takelis išliktų vidury. Gal žymint kitaip gaunasi sudėtingiau...
Kur susiduria žolė ir miškas kartais prisegu žolę prie miško tiksliai ten, kur prasideda miškas, tada žolė kiaurai eina per takelį ir vietoj trijų paralelių linijų gaunasi dvi.

Mano pozicija dėl stovėjimo aikštelių išlieka tokia, jog amenity=parking dėti tik ten, kur realiai yra stovėjimo aikštelė, t. y. yra P ženklas. Jeigu aš navigacijoje ieškau aikštelės, nenorėčiau būti nuvestas į kažkieno kiemą... Dėl to ir naudoju tą area:highway=service - parodo kad tai yra didesnis plotas už važiuojamąją dalį, bet nėra aikštelė. Plius stovėjimo aikštelėse galioja KET punktai, kurie paprastame kieme netaikomi.
ovruni (2022-05-19 21:43:33+00:00): Hola Elsy Rivadeneyra, en sus últimos conjuntos de cambios se han agregado edificios grandes que no se divisan desde las imágenes aéreas, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios. En caso desee hacer pruebas de edición existen instancias destinadas para ello. En la wiki puede encontrar mayor detalle sobre como realizar pruebas en esas instancias https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Saludos
maro21 (2023-03-14 00:21:48+00:00): Jaki tu jest sklep? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101759962
SP6ZOLW-7 (2023-03-14 21:40:31+00:00): hippo
SP6ZOLW-7 (2023-03-14 21:40:54+00:00): lecz mogło się to zmienić
NieWnen (2022-07-11 12:13:45+00:00): Tutaj jest ten sam problem, co pod tą zmianą: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121214888

Dla tej linii:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061890371
jmapb (2022-05-19 21:42:54+00:00): gift shop, added
NieWnen (2022-07-10 22:52:52+00:00): Aktualnie zostały nałożone na siebie 2 ścieżki, nie jest to poprawne. 

Jesteś w stanie powiedzieć, czy ten CPR jest rozdzielony od części pieszej i jakie sa nawierzchnie na tym odcinku (dla pieszych i rowerzystów)?
kbychowski (2022-07-11 06:50:51+00:00): 1. DDR lub CPR biegną po lewej stronie Warszawskiej/Klonowej patrząc w stronę Modlińskiej.
2. CPR/DDR ma tam nawierzchnię asfaltową
3. Niestety (poza powyższym) nie pamiętam konkretnego układu nawierzchni.
4. Rozumiem, że problem nałożenia na siebie 2 ścieżek dotyczy odcinka Warszawskiej od tunelu do granicy gminy Jabłonna?
5. Postaram się tam wybrać niebawem i doprecyzuję.
NieWnen (2022-07-11 11:51:32+00:00): 4. Tzn aktualnie jest tak, że są nieco w "nieładzie", bo ta linia
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061892464
Nachodzi na tą:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804883554
A tak być nie powinno.

W przypadku CPR, mapujemy to 1 linią. Ogólnie polecam wiki i podstronę rowery.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery

Prawdopodobnie będzie to przypadek S5, albo S7 (highway=path).

5. Super, dzięki.
aceman444 (2022-07-10 19:11:14+00:00): These also need the repair of brand:wikidata.
l0cKy (2022-07-21 14:24:09+00:00): done. sorry for the mess.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123896684
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121214929
aceman444 (2022-10-09 17:50:25+00:00): Thanks.
aceman444 (2022-12-14 07:07:30+00:00): Sadly some still remained, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9755759579
mueschel (2022-06-06 08:10:21+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'timing_point' is not used in other places - could you explain what it means?
TZorn (2022-05-20 20:46:59+00:00): Hi SaltWaterBill, did you move the node on the trail (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8226335238) intentionally? The trail looks strange now.
archpdx (2022-05-20 15:33:34+00:00): Hi,
Please note that we're not allowed to copy off of Google Maps, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

>The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. It includes using them for OSM mapping.
archpdx (2022-05-20 15:40:45+00:00): Streetlevel imagery sources OSM contributors are allowed to use include Bing Streetside, Mapillary, and KartaView, which all can be accessed in the editor using the hotkey 'u' under 'Photo overlays'
UPegasus (2022-05-26 11:48:58+00:00):  що це за автобусні зупинки посеред лісу?
felipeeugenio (2022-05-20 12:55:31+00:00): Hola ALonso. El área que incorporaste al comité Melilef pertenece al mismo comité? o simplemente modificaste el área? para corregirlo.

saludos
jleedev (2022-05-19 23:44:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ZLima12 (2022-05-19 23:56:56+00:00): These turn restrictions seem to have been added by Amazon mappers who thought that drivers aren't allowed to cross the double yellow line, even when turning into and out of driveways. I checked for each location, and there are no signs restricting motion.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121217713
Friendly_Ghost (2022-05-20 08:16:18+00:00): It's me again. I just read the Wiki documentation of shoal and it says that the tag is only for inland water bodies. It also says: "for the lower part of beaches lying below the water level at high tide - these should be part of a natural=sand + tidal=yes." Maybe you can adjust the tags again to match the documentation.
tastrax (2022-05-24 07:04:07+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
user_5359 (2022-05-22 10:39:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag building namel = pasar?
adrianojbr (2022-05-21 21:14:29+00:00): Olá, Lord45.

Duas dicas ao atualizar o mapa:
1. Evite alterar elementos muito distantes geograficamente, pois isso dificulta a verificação das alterações; e
2. Evite apagar elementos que existem para recriá-los, a fim de que seja preservado o histórico (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Manter_o_hist.C3.B3rico).

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121220123
jaguari (2022-05-21 22:42:52+00:00): ok. obrigado. vou cuidar mais isso
tastrax (2022-05-24 11:51:22+00:00): Hi there - Are you sure that the Ulverstone link from Queens Street to Hobbs Parade is actually as you have detailed. The Bing imagery is quite old. Maxar is more recent in this area and there is also Mapillary imagery from 2020 showing a different view as it was previously noted.
wolfgang8741 (2023-04-10 03:03:15+00:00): These look to be protected areas not hunting stands.
cserpell (2022-05-20 13:32:21+00:00): Hola BraixenAxl, ¿por qué borraste varias casas que estaban bien colocadas y verificadas en terreno?
ConnorWong (2022-05-20 19:58:07+00:00): Honorable Dwangchuk,

please use verbose, self-explaining changeset comments instead of a generic phrase like "updated": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Herman Lee (2022-05-20 05:30:30+00:00): Here you made some broken relations.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-22 15:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it is an undiscussed and duplicate and invalid import.
Herman Lee (2022-05-20 05:30:38+00:00): Here you made some broken relations.
user_5359 (2022-05-20 05:57:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9753439729. What ist the meaning of this foreign keys?
Please notice also the difference between the key Name (not used) and name
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-22 15:06:00+00:00): Reverted as it appears to be an undiscussed import
Warin61 (2022-07-14 09:41:34+00:00): Hi,

Way: 1061949919 does not appear to have any main tags. It does have a tag that I cannot understand .. building:levels+elevator, this appears to be only used by 'TfNSW Connected Journeys Data Team'. 

Would you or mapsamillion78 or some other member of your team kindly respond to the above enquiry about the meaning of building:levels+elevator?
cyton (2022-05-20 04:30:20+00:00): sorry for the changeset comment, JOSM froze and i could no longer enter text into any textbox, neither for saving the osm data for a restart, nor for changing tags, or to change the comment from last changeset
SomeoneElse (2022-05-25 15:07:45+00:00): Hello,
You swapped lat and long when adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9756301005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9756301006 
Best Regards,
Andy (current holder of the OSM bucket and shovel)
Allison P (2023-03-26 04:43:24+00:00): Still has not been corrected
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 23:42:05+00:00): @Allison P - thanks for the nudge.  Perhaps Marek's email client is broken and he is not receiving emails?  I have sent a message that he has to read before continuing to edit at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7000 so that he's aware of the issue.
marek kleciak (2023-03-30 06:49:29+00:00): Dear all, please remove both nodes with swapped lat and long, I tried it in iD.
Thanks and regards,
Marek
SomeoneElse (2023-03-30 13:39:14+00:00): You can do it in JOSM.  I've done it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134305473 .
AngocA (2025-12-30 21:55:13+00:00): Hi
This area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14162266 is not a maritime boundary.
user_12531033 (2022-05-21 12:43:10+00:00): 钱多，权多的地方自然会有市场。
Supaplex (2022-05-20 10:23:40+00:00): 為何你移除樹呢?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121223402
John Titor1337 (2022-05-20 05:25:16+00:00): The shop was called "Fröken Lakrits". Apologies for the typo!
ftcat (2022-06-01 08:18:05+00:00): Be careful when using mapwithai as the AI algorithms can not distinguish between large billboards and buildings, way 1061958737 is a billboard. Also Some of the imagery used to analyse for buildings is old so there are errors with a rapidly developing city like Lusaka
user_5359 (2022-05-20 10:32:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
kartler175 (2022-05-21 08:54:57+00:00): Please check your edits: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.24852&lat=46.62463&zoom=17&opacity=0.95
legofahrrad (2022-05-21 14:20:23+00:00): Moin! Haben die Parkplätze, bei denen du Namen ergänzt, wirklich diesen Eigennamen? Nur weil ein Parkplatz an einer bestimmten Straße ist, heißt er nicht direkt "Parkplatz [Straßenname]".
Viele Grüße!
SimonZ__ (2022-05-23 06:15:17+00:00): Moin, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Für die Parkplätze die keinen "richtigen" Eigennamen haben ist die Bezeichnung mit dem Straßennamen evtl. hilfreich. Ich werde das nochmal überprüfen und ggf. ändern.
Viele Grüße
jeslop (2022-05-20 09:42:53+00:00): Hola Vicropa. Creo que has confundido la etiqueta name con la que define al polígono. Y de todas formas, ¿seguro que es una central térmica y no una subestación eléctrica o similar?
Cambia las etiquetas en uno u otro sentido.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
vicropa (2022-05-20 10:20:38+00:00): Es una sala de calderas comunitaria pero allí hay un cartel que la llama "central térmica", aunque eso pueda entenderse como "planta de generación eléctrica". No he encontrado cómo indicar este tipo de edificio en OpenStreetMap. Mi intención era indicar la cerca circundante, que no estaba añadida.

Un saludo.
jeslop (2022-05-20 10:34:58+00:00): La verdad es que es complicado encontrar la etiqueta adecuada. 

¿Quizás power=generator, generator:source=gas, 
generator:type=boiler, generator:method=combustion, generator:output:heat=yes,
generator:output:hot_water=yes?

Está claro que el nombre es correcto.

Gracias por la respuesta.

Saludos.

Jesús
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-20 06:28:00+00:00): source should be survey
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-20 06:28:18+00:00): not survey, aerial image, sorry
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-05-20 06:38:07+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzI1LDY1XX0%3D&location=33.838946%2C-117.791672%2C16.80&style=SPEED_LIMIT
eggie (2022-05-20 08:15:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...   De accesstags die je hebt toegevoegd zijn default op wegen... dus die zouden gewoon weg kunnen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-20 08:40:56+00:00): PB contact
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-05-20 06:49:33+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzI1LDY1XX0%3D&location=33.861042%2C-117.790196%2C17.87&style=SPEED_LIMIT
user_8101879 (2022-05-22 14:29:11+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14161762 was not closed : I fixed it but if you want to control.

Best regards
WieKo68 (2022-05-23 21:02:30+00:00): Hi,
Report 14161762 and 14161143 are in the working phase and are being edited. Your corrections are wrong and will be corrected
Best regards

WieKo68
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-05-20 06:58:56+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzI1LDY1XX0%3D&location=33.874646%2C-117.807181%2C14.86&style=SPEED_LIMIT
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-05-20 07:14:05+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzI1LDY1XX0%3D&location=33.903791%2C-117.838694%2C16.94&style=SPEED_LIMIT
Владимир К (2022-08-01 07:06:43+00:00): названия улиц надо указывать вместе со статусной частью, подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия