piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
orycteropus1 (2021-08-27 06:29:53+00:00): hi zZzZz00

du hast beim glyssibach die fläche als waterway=riverbank/intermittent=yes eingetragen. 
das tag "riverbank" bezeichnet die wasserflächen der flüsse, das tag intermittent gemäss wiki :" Das Tag intermittent=* wird verwendet, wenn ein Wasserlauf (Fluss, Bach, Graben, ...) nicht ständig Wasser führt.", also periodische gewässer.
beim glyssibach handelt es sich aber um eine fläche, die praktisch nie überflutet wird, höchstens bei ganz extremen unwettern, für diesen zweck ist das tag "intermittent" nicht gedacht (s. Wiki Abschnitt "Abgrenzung". 
So gesehen erscheint mir dein Eintrag nicht korrekt, die ursprüngliche eintrag "shingle" trifft bei diesem geröll/"bachbett" wohl eher zu.
(s. DE:Tag:natural=shingle – OpenStreetMap Wiki)
was meinst du?
grüsse + schöne tag
christian
Frans S (2021-08-19 10:27:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
gpserror (2021-08-25 01:43:00+00:00): Hey, I think this changeset may have moved / straightened a road inadvertently - specifically the nodes in way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40722496 : 
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/81449/what-happened-to-this-way-why-is-it-straight-now

Could you take a look at this?
GeoDave5280 (2021-08-25 03:29:06+00:00): I used the JOSM revert tool to undo changeset 109901079.  This should restore the Green Mountain Trail to it's previous geometry.  I am not at all sure how this happened; but it was probably related to me taking a peek at Green Mountain imagery for an unrelated project while working Wyoming.  
Let me know if there is still a problem, and I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
-Dave
gpserror (2021-08-25 05:00:11+00:00): Thanks, looks better, hope it's not too difficult to split the errant and wanted changes.
eggie (2021-08-19 05:25:06+00:00): Beste Luis  Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus veroorzaakte je schade.
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109901210
Houd het gebied van je edits veel kleiner.
Je edits: Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is. 
ford=yes is een doorwaadbare plaats. waarom deze tag op reguliere wegen?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 05:44:07+00:00): Je bedoeling was uiteraard goed, maar je edits waren niet nodig. 

reverted by changeset  #109908439

Ik heb de changeset teruggedraaid. 
De schade is daarmee hersteld. Dat was het simpelst.
Op een busway komt per default al geen ander verkeer. 
foot=no hoef je dus niet toe te voegen. 
busway implies:
    access=no
    bus=designated
    emergency=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway
Opknippen van wegen met editor iD leidt helaas tot schade aan de routerelaties. Wanneer je busroutes wil opknippen gebruik dan editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 05:53:45+00:00): Aan J. Drijverweg bicycle, mofa en foot= no toegevoegd vanaf Spelderholt.
Bij de busways hoef je dit niet verder te doen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 06:17:47+00:00): De Scheepmakerskade liep door tuinen als een doorwaadbare plaats?
ford=yes?

Ik heb de hele weg verlegd. 
Gr eggie
DonRoPL (2022-12-23 17:41:03+00:00): Hey, what does the tag "was" mean?
goodidea (2022-12-27 05:56:09+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:was:*
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-29 06:29:41+00:00): You can square buildings using "Q".  None of the buildings added in this changeset are square.
user_11609320 (2023-04-30 09:32:01+00:00): you mean the houses? When I added these, the bing image wasn't good, so i was mostly using mapbox. so I am assuming there is an offset. I will adjust it, but what do you mean square?
user_11609320 (2023-04-30 09:36:35+00:00): I was looking at them and i was following the outline of the buildings. Last time i made them square, I had a couple of other editors getting mad at me for making them square in their private messages to me. These homes aren't square.
user_11609320 (2023-04-30 09:36:52+00:00): oh, nevermind, i see what you mean.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-30 16:16:49+00:00): I mean like squared angles or 90 degrees.  :D

Definitely not just squares!  The outlines are pretty good other than that!  :D
Warin61 (2021-08-19 07:37:35+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

There is an error in relation 13105685 - parking. The 2 outer ways share a segment - this is an error. 

My best solution would be to delete the shared segment and combine the 2 outer ways in to one way. Then just tag the single way for parking and then delete the relation. Much simpler data wise.
Frans S (2021-08-19 13:31:22+00:00): Hello,
Please use the project Imagery rather than the Bing.
Bing is outdated.
Frans S (2021-08-19 15:20:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Rectangular buildings has to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-29 06:30:16+00:00): None of the buildings are square.  "Q" can be used to square them.
RedSkies (2022-02-11 21:13:25+00:00): hi tcr
olo81 (2021-08-23 18:58:43+00:00): Rozdzielanie ścieżek pieszo rowerowych na dwie linie jest nierekomendowane. Prawdopodobnie niebawem zostanie wycofane takie mapowanie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
tsp15 (2021-09-09 15:18:31+00:00): Zdecydowałem się na oddzielenie ścieżek na przejściach/przejazdach, ponieważ są one w rzeczywistości fizycznie rozdzielone (oddziela je ok. półmetrowa warstwa żwiru).
olo81 (2021-09-09 16:41:32+00:00): Rzeczywiście jest tam coś co można uznać za rozdzielenie. Nie zwróciłem uwagi kiedy tam przejeżdżałem.
SCHLUMPFs (2021-09-15 08:45:39+00:00): Thank you for your contribution
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-21 21:50:08+00:00): Gracias por contribuir al mapa 👍
ivanbranco (2021-09-23 16:05:59+00:00): Hi Arlo,

you keep getting changeset comments, because of unique tags. What's the meaning of name:suppressed=*? Isn't there any name tag among those already in use that match your case?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aname

If it's been "suppressed" maybe it's an old_name=*?

inscription=* is used for text on buildings ecc. there's really a website url wrote on a monument?

The image=* tag is a duplicate of the kartaview=* tag.

Also, you mapped it as historic=monument, but as the Wiki says a monument is "a memorial object, which is especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through it) or very tall". From the kartaview imagery it doesn't look that big. Also you mapped it inside a shed, and there's no trace of a shed in the kartaview imagery.
Arlo James Barnes (2021-09-24 10:48:21+00:00): I'm not troubled by bespoke tagging, the real world has many idiosyncrasies and attempting 100% consistency has diminishing returns in any case. Of course, being an open database I welcome anyone who wants to emend the objects I touch; likewise I am happy to respond to changeset comments.

To answer your questions, the label remains accurate but dominates the osm-carto display for Lamy. I am of course aware of the caveat against attempting to satisfy the oddities of any particular data consumer, but perhaps consider it a placeholder tag while I understand why it is given such undue cartographic emphasis and how that can be rectified. The 'especially large' language you quote seems an important clue that I should look for another schema to denote a sculptural object that serves a primarily commemorative purpose (although not one related to the surroundings except indirectly, via the operator). You are correct, incidentally; it is merely perhaps a meter and a half tall.

Good catch on the second concern, I think the appropriate key would be `inscription:url`.

I thought that the image provider tags used merely a unique ID instead of a complete URI, rather like `wikidata` versus a more generic website key. But your point is well taken that the same basic info is encoded either way and can safely be deduplicated.

Speaking of the KartaView image, it is a faithful depiction of the appearance of the object, but as far as the portrayed setting, that is outdated (from when it was across the road from where it is now).
ivanbranco (2021-09-24 15:30:43+00:00): "The 'especially large' language you quote seems an important clue that I should look for another schema to denote a sculptural object that serves a primarily commemorative purpose"

For smaller objects there's historic=memorial.

KartaView image is outdated you say, so you confirm there's a shed right now? And that the memorial is inside the shed? 

I still dont understand what's the meaning of name:suppressed. Sorry but English is not my first language.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2022-02-15 02:57:23+00:00): Hi mutiaputriutami, i changed this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/400384250 from living street to residential based on this kartaview image https://kartaview.org/details/3508749/1547/track-info.
yzal (2021-08-27 13:29:57+00:00): Dobrý deň, odstránil som zmeny čo ste robili na Hviezdoslavovej ulici v Bojniciach, nakoľko nezodpovedali realite. Zákaz vjazdu okrem dopravnej obsluhy je už roky vyjadrený značkami vehicle=delivery a psv=yes. Viac napr. tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Road_signs_in_Slovakia
nex0ma (2021-08-19 07:35:55+00:00): прошу прощения, это ошибочное название, следует удалить.

need to remove, sorry, my fault.
odh0 (2021-08-19 12:30:31+00:00): Ich denke der andere Poller in der Ringstraße südlich ist auch abgesenkt. Der östlichste auch?
pitfire (2021-08-19 13:05:07+00:00): Stimmt, den hab ich übersehen. Hab auch nur die PDF "AMTSBLATT der KREISSTADT SIEGBURG" interpretiert.
https://siegburg.de/static/web/amtsblatt/amtsblatt_2019_kw_41.pdf
Der östliche Poller bleibt laut PDF Poi unberührt.
odh0 (2021-08-19 16:36:10+00:00): Weiss leider nicht wie man ein Geradeausfahrverbot nur in einer Richtung an einem Poller editiert.
Zsolt Beringer (2021-08-19 06:00:59+00:00): #Akármi iD editorban van ez csak a felhasználó elé tolva. (Ebben JOSM/plugin kombóban nem találtam meg.)
MKnight (2021-08-27 09:02:41+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier die oneway-Richtungen wieder zurückgedreht.
Fahrtrichtung ist nach wie vor von schützengasse nach hegelstrasse. Wenn ich mich recht entsinne bleibt das auch nach den Bauarbeiten so.
Ich habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht.
Frans S (2021-08-19 09:16:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Frans S (2021-08-19 12:01:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
eggie (2021-08-19 06:59:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
wkdgs (2021-09-08 12:12:17+00:00): Hallo,

ist wirklich sicher, dass hier die Zugangsbeschränkung "private" für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer gilt? Dass ein Weg ein "Privatweg" ist, heißt noch nicht, dass er z.B. von Fußgängern nicht benutzt werden darf.

Könntest du dazu noch mehr Infos bereitstellen. Wer ist der Besitzer des Privatweges und gibt es an beiden Enden des Weges Schilder, die Durchfahrt und Durchgang verbieten?

LG
winkeldings
eggie (2021-08-19 07:34:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2021-08-20 13:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
RaccoonFederation (2021-08-19 08:25:57+00:00): Hi, Doesn't tagging it as a Bridlepath mean that not even a car can get down there?
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-19 08:41:01+00:00): Ciao. Non mi risulta ci sia una pista ciclabile sulla destra. C'è solo un marciapiede. Perché sia una pista ciclabile, ci deve essere la segnaletica. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109913231
mikki65 (2021-08-19 23:34:06+00:00): e' nuova fatta da poco
Frans S (2021-08-19 10:49:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
kumartcx (2021-08-20 11:22:19+00:00):  Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings.I've made the neccessary changes in the changeset # 109978016.
Going ahead,I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.
Thanks again,Happy mapping!

Regards,
kumartcx
SekeRob (2021-08-19 09:21:15+00:00): hi there,

I'm still here, waiting on my Covid shot, domani. It's funny to see bus stops on the south side of Vespucci when it's 1 way east to west there. I've noticed in one alert if a bus stop if tagged to a route and it's on the other side of a road it's flagged as being on the wrong side, but these are not linked. These particularly I took a picture of, at least 2 are of the 19th century model, probably from way before Vespucci for the majority part became 1-way. Historic relics.

ciao
mavl (2021-08-20 13:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
archie (2021-08-19 08:27:02+00:00): Deine edits - so auch dieser - haben, auf alle Fälle hier in Schweden immer einen offset. Richte bitte den Bildhintergrund - in diesem Fall Bing - richtig ein bevor du edits machst. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#ID
Gunnaldo (2021-08-19 08:49:38+00:00): Oha ... sorry ... werden versuchen, künftig gewissenhafter darauf zu achten.
archie (2021-08-19 10:02:07+00:00): Gut. Ich will das mal illustrieren mit meinem cs der die Berichtigungen aufzeigt (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109922238). Und dies ist nur ein Bruchteil und nicht nur an dieser Stelle wo du editiert hast.
archie (2021-08-19 10:13:05+00:00): Ich gehe davon aus, dass du diesen cs (#109914031) - gerne auch die vorhergehenden - berichtigst.
Gunnaldo (2021-08-19 11:04:15+00:00): Hallo Archie,

Frage zur Einrichtung des Bildhintergrundes:
Welcher Bildhintergrund bzw. welche Satellitenbildquelle ist quasi der Master? Bing als Hintergrund zeigt mir z.B. die Gebäudeumrisse exakt deckungsgleich mit dem Hintergrundbild. Beim Umschalten auf "Esri Weltbilder" ist in der Tat ein Offset zu erkennen (tatsächlich ein paar Meter).
Welches Satellitenkartenmaterial ist für Schweden am geeignetsten? Was schlägst Du vor?
Oder gibt es irgendwo feste, genormte Linien, an denen man das Hintergrundbild ausrichten kann?

(Übrigens, jene Navi-Software, die ich nutze, und auf OSM-Karten basiert, hatte bislang nie gravierende Positionsprobleme in Schweden, wenn ich in Gebieten fahre, in denen ich auch herumgemappt hatte.)
archie (2021-08-19 11:16:13+00:00): Den Bildhintergrund mußt du anhand von gps-Spuren in der Nähe - sowohl nord-südlich als auch west-östlich - ausrichten. Erst danach ist das Satellitenbild tauglich für das Editieren. Gehe so vor wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden. Dies ist grundlegend für die Arbeit mit osm.
Josef73 (2022-02-01 20:34:15+00:00): the tag opening_hours is wrong. Look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aopening_hours
Frans S (2021-08-19 10:28:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 

Best regards and success with future mappings
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
BCNorwich (2021-08-19 18:11:56+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think the shop is really joined to the centerline of the highway? Could you please position it more precisely?

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
joost schouppe (2021-08-25 12:48:17+00:00): Dag Joris,
Volgens de note op de weg die je hebt aangepast mag je van de Meuleschettestraat niet naar de Dirk Martensstraat afslaan. Je hebt dat nu wél mogelijk gemaakt, maar de note niet verwijderd. Is deze afslag echt toegestaan?
Nargessalehiii1367 (2022-05-28 12:14:07+00:00): Move office
limmmoh (2021-08-19 08:28:12+00:00): Driver Feedback
skyper (2021-10-02 20:56:27+00:00): Hallo dktue
Der Busbahnhof war doch schon eingetragen, wenn auch veraltet. Jetzt ist er doppelt vorhanden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24921779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974579655

Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen. Danke.

Grüße skyper
skyper (2022-02-13 14:17:08+00:00): Weiterhin zwei Mal vorhanden.
NKA (2021-08-27 17:17:14+00:00): Samme kommentar her, om Brynsveien.
emvee (2021-08-19 20:53:11+00:00): Prima geconstateerd maar deze wijziging maar mijn inziens meer kapot dan het oplost.

Verschillende fietspaden lopen nu dood en bijv. het groene midden van de Rotonde is niet verwijderd.

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2021-08-19 21:53:05+00:00): Martin.. Ik ga hier maar wat aanpassen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 22:15:24+00:00): In ieder geval de zaak weer routeerbaar gemaakt en de busroutes hersteld als beginnetje.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 21:48:25+00:00): Hier zij helaas alle routerelaties stuk door een kleine aanpassing.
Realiseer je dat de kaart ook gebruikt wordt door andere gebruikers. Het lijkt helaas veel op vernieling van de kaart.
Hoe gaat hier nu het fietsverkeer?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 22:02:13+00:00): Busroutes hersteld... losliggend fietspad weer routeerbaar gemaakt
eggie (2021-08-19 22:45:51+00:00): Beste Arriva.. Wanneer je een opmerking op de kaart zet zal een ervaren mapper het vast wel oppakken.
Routerelaties zijn gewoon heel lastig en geen beginnerswerk. Vraag volgende keer hulp hierbij aan ervaren mappers

MVG
eggie
brust84 (2021-08-19 21:07:23+00:00): rechtsseitig*
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
eggie (2021-08-19 21:45:27+00:00): Beste Arriva.. Ga niet zonder ervaring en/of met een simpele editor als iD rotondes tekenen. Er lopen vaak tallozen OV, iets en wandelrouterelaties en die gaan dan allemaal stuk. 
Vraag hulp op het forum van OSM of zet een opmerking op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-08-19 14:11:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Rectangular buildings has to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
kumartcx (2021-08-20 11:20:49+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings.I've made the neccessary changes in the changeset #109977714 .
Going ahead,I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.
Thanks again,Happy mapping!

Regards,
kumartcx
SafetyIng (2021-08-20 08:33:08+00:00): How could be a road, that leads to a human settlement, a "track"? Please chekc the definition on the wiki! And correct these here.