piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2022-08-28 19:07:23+00:00): Sollen das Fußwege mit Radfahrer frei sein?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125484856
navigist (2022-09-01 17:43:22+00:00): Ja, kombinierte
Langlaeufer (2022-08-28 19:10:11+00:00): Das sieht im Luftbild für beide Straßen nach Asphalt aus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125484926
navigist (2022-09-01 17:45:34+00:00): Ich habe Bürgersteige hinzugefügt. Die sind da und sieht man auf den Sat-Aufnahmen.
navigist (2022-09-01 17:48:16+00:00): Ah, jetzt verstehe ich das Problem. Ich habe nichts daran geändert, das surface=asphalt ist, was aber richtig ist, ist ja  die Straße. Die "surface" vom Bürgersteig ist das ja nicht und habe ich auch nicht angegeben/geändert.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-02 07:11:13+00:00): Sorry, ich glaube mein Kommentar ist am falschen Änderungssatz gelandet. osmcha.org hat da anscheinend etwas Probleme.
somix (2022-08-28 16:47:34+00:00): Hi! It's better to mark fallen trees as barrier=log. It's approved and has a page on wiki.

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlog
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree#Fallen_trees
HellMap (2022-08-28 17:19:02+00:00): Hey! I remember looking at the tags for barriers and "log" didn't seem right at the time but I didn't look much more into it.

To me, this is a log: [1]

While this node is not really a log: [2]

Even something like this I wouldn't think of as a log: [3]

I guess log has 7.5k usages and fallen_tree "only" 450. And I guess log is used for naturally fallen trees. I suppose these can be changed to log and instead I should tag access on these instead like foot=yes and bicycle=dismount and motor_vehicle=no or something.

I've tagged fallen trees a bunch over time.[4] If these should be logs, then I suppose all of these nodes should be converted too.

[1] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=656291435212346&focus=photo
[2] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1569506096815253&focus=photo 
[3] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=824014125429365&focus=photo
[4] https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lqt
Kurt PM Lapere (2022-08-28 16:40:26+00:00): sources:
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00631/74296/74004.pdf
https://www.hauts-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/docob-site-npc-005-parties-a-et-b.pdf
MikeT_test (2023-01-04 01:23:59+00:00): FYI. The name tag is for the name of a feature only. Whether something is "open" or "closed" belongs in the access tags.
MikeT_test (2023-01-04 01:24:52+00:00): Same applies to the ref tag, it is only for the route number, not for access info.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:56:47+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=Metall
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983655891/history

Have you maybe meant
material=metal
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
René84828 (2024-01-30 22:13:51+00:00): Hello Mateusz!

I just used the "Metall" entry from the drop-down menu. This is the German name for metal.
https://ibb.co/Qr9jwqk
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 18:37:40+00:00): Note that blue ones in German are translated values (you can also see raw tag values on list below)

black ones are raw, untranslated tag values


when you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983655891/history you will also see raw tag values - thanks for fixing!
btwhite92 (2022-09-06 14:25:51+00:00): Hello,
I've noticed this is the second time you've changed tags for foot/bicycle=designated to foot/bicycle=yes on this stretch of the TRT. Why are you making this change? These trails are designated for foot, bicycle, and equestrian use and are signposted as such.

Bradley
HawkEyeTrails (2022-09-06 17:43:56+00:00): I noticed that the way these trails were designated in OSM, creates routing errors when using other apps. For example, if you are 100 feet north of 50, coming from Spooner Lake and you try to cross 50 and continue on the TRT, it was routing your on a 3 mile detour that had you basically do a circumnavigation of Spooner. 3 miles instead of 300 feet! But it could be there is a much more elegant solution. Or it could be there is some other issue that is causing the way OSM is currently set up, it is causing all these routing errors.
btwhite92 (2022-09-08 22:51:47+00:00): This sounds like a problem with the routing engine rather than the data. "Massaging" data to correct undesired behavior in third-party apps is generally considered bad practice, similar to "tagging for the renderer". If the tags are correct (in this case, foot/bicycle/horse=designated rather than *=yes, because these trails aren't just simply open for use via these travel modes but are designated specifically for use via these modes), then the problem is with app, not the data.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-06 15:58:56+00:00): Hi,
ich merke gerade ich muss hier Einspruch einlegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
smoothness=good heißt:
Geeignet für Rennräder mit schmalen Reifen. 
Verwendet für befestigte Straßen mit ersten Alterungserscheinungen.
Die besten unbefestigten Straßen sind jedoch intermediate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125486422
Langlaeufer (2022-12-06 16:00:26+00:00): Ich würde vorziehen hier keine smoothness zu taggen, weil intermediate wiederum zu einer "Bestrafung" für das Fahrradrouting führt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125486422
jguddas (2022-12-06 16:11:24+00:00): Um welchen weg handelt es sich denn, hier im changeset sind ja mehrere?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125486422
Langlaeufer (2022-12-06 16:50:25+00:00): Vermutlich um alle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125486422
Truchin (2022-08-30 07:58:01+00:00): Bonjour Tazdait,

Sur le quai d'Orsay, tu as ajouté un doublon pour la piste cyclable puisqu'elle est déjà présente sur un way. J'ai corrigé. Bonne continuation

Thomas
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 23:07:25+00:00): Por favor, no asigne "eventos"
user_5359 (2022-08-29 10:59:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089897628. What is the meaning of the tags 
area_ha = 0.38
codice = 1.1.3.2
codice_num = 11320
codistat = 23067
data_class = 2006
lc_i_lvl = 1
lc_ii_lvl = 11
lc_iii_lvl = 113
lc_iv_lvl = 1132
legenda = Strutture residenziali isolate
nomcom = Rovere' Veronese
perimetro = 419.27
provincia = VR
vrmap (2022-08-29 11:51:38+00:00): thanks, I have corrected.
ivanbranco (2022-08-29 12:19:41+00:00): Ciao vrmap,

questo sembra un import. Per gli import ci sono delle linee guida da seguire: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines

Rischi che ti venga revertato il lavoro per import non documentato o licenza non compatibile.

Inoltre se riesci commenta i changeset, qua ci sono degli spunti su come commentare (e perché) un changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Buon mapping :)
vrmap (2022-08-29 15:50:07+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco,
hai ragione, la pigrizia a volte ...
Buon mapping anche a te.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-28 09:50:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3801463565/history - do you remember whether it was existing and providing fresh water? Or existing but was disused and broke/switched off?
joost schouppe (2022-08-29 06:58:08+00:00): Ziet er goed uit!
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 19:01:45+00:00): All buildings are being tagged as building=yes for now., until It's possible to actually verify the building types
Allison P (2022-08-28 21:54:44+00:00): Please orthogonalize the buildings before uploading by pressing Q.
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 21:58:49+00:00): Ok.. thanks for the tip.. Sometimes I draw very squarish and with right angle then move it and make it out of shapez I'll keep in mind to orthogonalize it when I'm done:)
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 22:01:36+00:00): Satellite imagery for this area is very good, I wish I could get some help drawing Hermiston buildings
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 22:01:57+00:00): Also there is Hermiston public map
riiga (2022-08-28 19:09:59+00:00): Hej!

Varför har du ritat om korsningen (rv 63/lv 205/lv 244) som jag rättade för någon månad sedan? I OSM är grundregeln att man bara ska rita separata vägar om det finns fysisk separation (refug/räcke/vajer). Svängfil och liknande beskrivs med taggar. Jag har rättat det igen.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-09-03 22:45:16+00:00): Yes, it is surface parking
b-jazz (2022-09-04 16:37:44+00:00): Pipes that cross over each other and do not connect (no 4 way junction physically in the pipe) should NOT share nodes between them. Please fix this.
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 22:41:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9983774899

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour
user_2066394 (2022-08-29 14:57:52+00:00): nachbereitet
dshowland (2022-12-03 20:35:04+00:00): Can you help me understand the usage of the "access=permissive" tag used on the upper section of Ravine Road here?
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2022-09-02 23:04:10+00:00): Moin Markus
Willkommen in OSM! ;-)
Ich war paar Tage vor Deinem Edit vor Ort in Hinterweidenthal-Ost ausgestiegen, um gen Bundenthal zu radeln entlang der Strecke, habe mich vor Ort (und daheim beim Zurechtschieben der Daten nach Bing) dann auch gefragt, wo wohl die alten Gleise gelegen haben mögen, die man auf dem alten Bild im Wikipedia-Bahnhofs-Artikel sieht, und habe lange und bisher erfolglos nach einem alten Gleisplan gesucht. Hattest Du einen? In den histor. Luftbildern von R-P, über die ich heute stolperte, sind auch noch Luftbilder mit altem Gleisbestand drin, die Deine Edits nicht ganz bestätigen, H.-Ost scheint demnach keinen Flankenschutz gehabt zu haben und die Abstellgleise auf der Nordseite scheinen nur am Westende angeschlossen zu sein etc. Hab's mal Pi x Daumen und auch passend zum Bahnhofsbild geändert, dass in einem Detail zum Jahrzehnte älteren Luftbid abweicht (Das https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091380724 muss später weggefallen sein).
PS: "Flankenschutz" ist eine Beschreibung und kein Name, gehört also ggfs. in description=... statt name=...
Gruß M.
MarkusGamerHDofficial (2022-09-03 20:37:15+00:00): Hi! Die Gleispläne hab ich mir von www.queichtalbahn.hpage entnommen bzw. Bilder wie die Gleise mal lagen, die Gleispläne die ich auf Google gefunden hatte waren zwar nicht offiziell aber dennoch von original Luftbildern und Gleisplänen von 1980 war es glaub ich ab gezeichnet, und entspricht auch mit den Bildern, und den Kenntnissen von Menschen, meiner Oma und meinem Vater als Beispiel. Die Abstellgleise nördlich waren auf beiden Seiten angeschlossen gut zu sehen auf einem der Bilder auf der oben genannten Seite, vom Flankenschutz hab ich keine Bilder. Also die Gleise die ich hingesetzt hatte entsprechen Ortskenntnissen und Gleisplänen die von Luftbildern aus den 80ern
Hugoren Martinako (2022-08-28 18:08:54+00:00): Fe de erratas: no es posible el acceso desde la margen IZQUIERDA (el río desciende de N-S)
elgolfo (2023-01-06 08:20:01+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

warum hast du hier alle Wege im NSG Biesendorfer Sand für Fahrräder gesperrt?
Das passt in meinen Augen nicht. In der Verordnung zum NSG[1] steht zu den relevanten Verboten lediglich

> 3. mit Kraftfahrzeugen aller Art, außer Krankenfahrstühlen, zu fahren oder dort Kraftfahrzeuge abzustellen,
> 13.  dieses außerhalb vorhandener Wege zu betreten oder zu befahren,

Es wäre schön, wenn du das wieder reparierst.

Moritz
[1]: https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/jlr-BiesenNatSchGebVBErahmen
BER319 (2023-01-06 08:52:12+00:00): Hallo elgolfo,

weil das jetzt auch eine geschützte Grünanlage ist. Den Gesetzestext findest du im Internet.
Fahrradfahren ist dort nur auf dafür gekennzeichneten Wegen erlaubt.

VG
BER319
BER319 (2023-01-06 09:05:38+00:00): Nachtrag 

dort = in einer geschützte Grünanlage 

Bilder der Schilder kann ich gerne liefern.
elgolfo (2023-01-06 10:08:08+00:00): Hallo BER319,

danke für den Hinweis. Wenn ich schaue, sehe ich es auch im FIS-Broker[1]. Dann passt das ja fast, nur z.B. dieser Weg hier[2] ist außerhalb der Grünanlage.
Falls du die Möglichkeit hast, kannst du die Bilder bei Mapillary hochladen?
Dann passe ich das bei Gelegenheit mal an.

Beste Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/index.jsp?loginkey=zoomStart&mapId=gris_oeffgruen@senstadt&bbox=400468,5815255,402096,5817246
[2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96057449
BER319 (2023-01-10 07:57:59+00:00): Hallo Moritz,

die Bilder sind jetzt Online. Alles was ich gefunden habe ist bei Mapillary hochgeladen. Teilwese fehlen aber schon wieder Schilder, was an den leeren Säulen zu erkennen ist. Was die Betreten verboten Schilder am Amselweg zu bedeuten haben kann ich dir nicht sagen, die stehen seit ca. 2 Jahren obwohl dahinter ja das öffentliche Naturschutzgebiet ist.

VG
BER319

z.B.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1383519035752617
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-28 21:08:31+00:00): Was it open this time, or not?
You could add prefix proposed:
b-unicycling (2022-08-28 23:24:24+00:00): Not on a Sunday at that time of day anyway. I was just passing through and saw the name over the door.
bergaufsee (2022-09-07 19:52:14+00:00): Ich kann vor Ort keine Zugangsbeschränkung erkennen, sehe nur das "P" ohne Zusatz, nehme daher acces=customers wieder raus.
Und ja ich weiß, der alte Parkplatz war nur für Lehrpersonal und auch so beschildert. Wenn ich was übersehen habe bitte melden.
user_9434724 (2022-08-28 18:49:20+00:00): Hello,
may you explain why you deleted this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530664230 ?
This was perfectly valid, as discernible on satellite imagery.
user_15552334 (2022-08-29 14:43:42+00:00): It aint, it was a dual carrigeway there, so I was fixing it smh
user_12523467 (2022-08-30 04:41:10+00:00): He is not an Imam
LockOnGuy (2022-08-30 04:46:51+00:00): Hi Lamassu, I honestly don’t know anything about him, the names I put you can see them in Wikidata too. If they’re wrong please edit the names to the correct ones. Thank you dear friend.
user_12523467 (2022-08-30 04:48:40+00:00): well do
user_12733236 (2022-08-28 19:01:29+00:00): All buildings are being tagged as building=yes for now., until It's possible to actually verify the building types
BCNorwich (2022-08-28 19:28:41+00:00): Hi, This is an unclassified highway as verified by the County Council and various Ordnance Survey Maps. Please don't corrupt OpenstreetMap's verifiable data by changing the way status to suit your own agenda.

I've reverted this changeset because you also dragged other features out of alignment.
user_5359 (2022-08-29 10:56:05+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089922380 (one of four objects). What is the meaning of the tags
Enabled = 1
ObjectID = 3850
SHAPE_Leng = 0.012079500330071
fcode = 46003
fdate = 2012-02-27
flowdir = 1
ftype = 460
innetwork = 1
lengthkm = 1.139
mainpath = 0
permanent_ = 33548193
reachcode = 02080202001324
resolution = 2
visibility = 100000
?
user_5359 (2022-08-29 11:14:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9983925312. What is the correct value of the key socket:type2? Notice a sign character isn't part of the key.
socket:type2 = 2
socket:type2= = Zástrčka IEC 62196-2 Type 2 nebo VDE-AR-E 2623-2-2, Mennekes
wielandb (2024-03-27 21:06:06+00:00): Hey :)
You added signage tags and some access tags to the "Seepromenade" in this changeset. I am wondering if there is any other ("unofficial") signage at those ways prohibiting pedestrians, bicycles, carriages etc.?
jengelh (2024-03-27 21:13:34+00:00): nicht dass ich wüsste. Auf dem Rundweg Fußverkehr verbieten würde irgendwie dem touristischen Ziel zugegen laufen.
jengelh (2024-03-27 21:23:00+00:00): iseewhatyoumean.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149243476
BCNorwich (2022-08-29 06:56:15+00:00): Hello there, In case you didn't see my reply giving information on the status of these roads I'll state it here below.

Hi, The ownership of the land is a different matter from that of highway status. Actually, almost all land in the UK is owned so technically all land is private. But this has no bearing on the legal status of access to a highway.

This link :- https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/map?usrn=24901356 , will show that all of Ironstone Lane, as I said, is open to the public by virtue that it is maintained at public expense.

USRN: 24901356
IRONSTONE LANE, SCALFORD
Classification: None
Responsibility: Maintainable at public expense, Leicestershire
Street State: Open

USRN: 24901355
IRONSTONE LANE, HOLWELL, AB KETTLEBY
Classification: None
Responsibility: Maintainable at public expense, Leicestershire
Street State: Open

USRN: 24901354
STONE PENN LANE, HOLWELL, AB KETTLEBY
Classification: None
Responsibility: Maintainable at public expense, Leicestershire 
Street State: Open  

These are all unclassified highways as verified by the County Council and various Ordnance Survey Maps. Please don't corrupt OpenstreetMap's verifiable data by changing the status of the highway tag to suit your own agenda.

Regards Bernard.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 11:30:51+00:00): Power lines should be tagged as such
canfe (2023-04-23 08:33:23+00:00): Sorgente S07 S.Eusebio (9983959437, v1)
Vedo che mappi come water_work delle sorgenti o gabbiotti che le proteggono.
Quello è per gli impianti di depurazione, invece per i gabbiotti usa 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dspring_box
Qui un po' di casistica, vedi se riesci a correggere.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1u7m
lukasbrunner (2023-04-23 15:20:04+00:00): Grazie dell'informazione, provvedo al più presto.
kepivar (2022-08-28 20:08:07+00:00): Why have you converted landuses into multipolygons? "area" is not a proper changeset comment for this.
redd (2022-08-28 20:03:59+00:00): Dankeschön!
Strubbl (2022-08-28 20:31:53+00:00): Hallo Rainer, warum machst du oneway im Kreuzungsbereich? Ich hatte die extra mal von oneway bereinigt. Wenn ich die Straßenseite wechseln will, dann wird doch kein Mensch über 3 Ampeln gehen statt nur über 1? Und beim Linksabbiegen fährt man doch auch über die Ampel die zuerst grün wird.

Viele Grüße
Sven
Rainero (2022-08-28 20:52:39+00:00): Hallo Sven,
oneway gilt nur für Fahrzeuge, d.h. hier nur für Fahrräder, Fußgänger sind also nicht betroffen. 
Die Ampeln für Fahrräder sind nur in der Soll-Fahrtrichtung vorhanden. D.h. linksabbiegen: erst geradeaus, dann links.  
Erst links, dann rechts und wieder links  machen zwar viele und ist schneller, wenn die Ampel für die Querstraße gerade grün zeigt, ist aber nicht korrekt.

Viele Grüße,  
Rainer
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
mueschel (2022-09-13 09:32:06+00:00): Bitte schau mal nach diesem Knoten,  "direction_n" ist ein Tippfehler:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9984039104
Friedel-C (2022-09-16 18:37:08+00:00): korrigiert :-)
user_5359 (2022-08-29 11:06:10+00:00): Hello! Short hint: Please use maxspeed:type instead of maxspeed:type:maxspeed.
OrangeHurst97 (2022-08-29 11:42:04+00:00): Apologies, that was a mistake on my part. Thank you for correcting it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-28 23:23:13+00:00): FYI - you can connect paths over water, just make sure you use bridge/tunnel, as appropriate...
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-28 23:23:42+00:00): actually, it appears it was the edit before this one.  :)
bxl-forever (2022-08-29 08:12:47+00:00): Strange name for that bus stop.
Is this a real edit?
Floriangolonka (2022-08-29 11:22:36+00:00): I don't think so
SekeRob (2022-08-30 11:24:33+00:00): 2 node edit, 1 in Moskwa and one near Canosa, España.

Please, next time, save such edits separately. All other compradres di mappatura will thank you as then it wont cause history view glut anywhere else in between.

For your reading pleasure: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

ciao from Italy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SekeRob (2022-09-03 09:00:03+00:00): Ciao,

Il tuo set di modifiche ha 8 avvisi tra cui "warnings:impossibile_oneway:highway"

Osservazioni:

Passi e percorso a senso unico? Veramente?
Scalini sopra gradini? Non c'è modo.

Ogni volta che si mappano i percorsi, considerare se un veicolo che entra, può uscire.

Ho corretto gli 8 problemi e ti chiedo di tenerne conto nei tuoi prossimi sforzi di mappatura

Grazie
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 05:55:36+00:00): Do you have a source and timeline for these "proposed" changes?
Unggo99 (2023-02-22 06:29:58+00:00): The bridge location placement were based on a passby and memory iirc.

https://www.penndot.pa.gov/RegionalOffices/district-4/ConstructionsProjectsAndRoadwork/Pages/SR-84-Bridge-Replacement-Project.aspx
mueschel (2022-09-13 09:14:12+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, it got a strange va=wa tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089942817
SomeoneElse (2022-09-13 09:20:59+00:00): Thanks - fixed
Allison P (2022-08-28 21:00:00+00:00): No errors introduced this time. I didn't end up doing any bulk moves because the vast majority of the address nodes were already inside the homes. One building was accidentally marked as detached that I corrected before uploading. One preexisting error was also corrected. Note that I did not download 54 buildings added by another user that were tagged generically as building=house. I conflated them in iD in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125495369.
NorthCrab (2023-01-02 18:52:07+00:00): Nie nadawaj nazw paczkomatom. Samo istnienie tagu ref= wygeneruje ich nazwę która jest łatwa w utrzymaniu na skalę globalną. Pozdrawiam!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
mKwiatek (2025-02-09 22:03:58+00:00): Cześć. Zerknij na znaczniki Track grade1 i Surface grass się gryzą. Jak znasz tę drogę to będziesz wiedział który usunąć. Pozdrawiam Dylówka (1089940673), v1
ID`s (2022-09-01 16:44:40+00:00): Я, доречі, думаю що це всеж таки TOG. Скоріш за все саме тут будують ті самі нові будинки. Багато новин про це.
Mazda05 (2022-09-02 23:16:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2022-09-02 23:18:22+00:00): чи ви вважаєте, що це казарми терористів та колаборантів і варто їх розмітити та позначити як landuse=military+military=barracks?
Mazda05 (2022-09-02 23:19:33+00:00): доречі інформація про це є, однак наразі я не можу це підтвердити по всіх трьох ціх зонах
Sloyment (2022-09-04 03:21:59+00:00): These are apartment buildings. No need to delete them!
Mazda05 (2022-09-04 13:39:02+00:00): Sloyment, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war