piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2022-11-25 02:34:12+00:00): 與道路共用的單車行徑路線不會分開重疊標示，而是在道路加上單車可通行屬性，而在單車路線部分加上 detour 表示施工期間可改道部分
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129344514
s8evq (2022-11-26 20:49:36+00:00): Dag Bart,

Je vroeg me eerder al om je edits te bekijken rond Drieslinter. Ook deze edit heb ik eens bekeken. In ieder geval bedankt om mee te werken aan OSM. Er zat een klein foutje in. Je had een miniscuul stukje weg vergeten te verwijderen van hoe het traject er foutief in zat, namelijk dit hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083278179
Die kleine stukje vallen soms niet goed op.
martinst (2022-11-26 06:39:28+00:00): Steht an den Wegen jeweils ein Verbotsschild oder woher leitet sich das Fahrradverbot ab?
GPX3T (2022-11-26 08:07:31+00:00): Nicht jeweils. Das leicht zu übersehende Hinweisschild zu Verhaltensweisen im Naturschutzgebiet (Kein Feuer, Kein Camping, kein Fahrradfahren auf Wegen die kleiner als Forststrassen sind, ... ) befindet sich am Gatter auf der Forststrasse bergauf vor der Fischbachalm.
EliotB (2022-12-29 10:04:45+00:00): Possibly merged two nodes that should not be merged into this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5629821012
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-30 05:04:18+00:00): I've run the address import tool which has automatically fixed this and some other dragged nodes (https://osm.org/changeset/130671132)
TMC1358 (2022-11-24 22:35:56+00:00): Technically it is one building split into two. Little Caesars is on the east side.
jeslop (2022-11-25 09:43:54+00:00): Las siglas y abreviaturas no deben ser incuidas en la etiqueta name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)

Corrijo éstos y otros errores del mismo tipo en otros conjuntos de cambios.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
alessandrocarmeli (2022-11-25 14:05:16+00:00): dalla rotonda di lignano all'innesto sulla sp128 direi meglio secondaria
cristodcgomez (2022-11-25 07:33:50+00:00): Gracias por iniciar la colaboración con la ubicación de viviendas.

Podrías indicar las fuentes (datos de origen) que utliza para definirlos?

Como comentario me gustaría añadir que es mejor evitar que las areas de las casas se enlacen a las aceras, ya que debería haber un margen entre ellas.

Un saludo.
jeslop (2022-11-25 09:49:15+00:00): Hola b4rd0, bienvenido a OSM.

¿Cuál es la fuente para este cambio de nombres de calle?

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
b4rd0 (2022-11-25 10:20:35+00:00): Buenas. Hasta hace unos 3 meses toda esta zona carecía de nombre en las calles. Hace tres meses el Ayuntamiento de Alicante asignó los nombres.
jeslop (2022-11-25 11:45:36+00:00): Gracias por la información b4rd0. Gracias por tus aportaciones.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
abakus_uploader (2022-11-25 23:31:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
jeslop (2022-11-25 09:39:14+00:00): Revierto la eliminación del nombre de una carretera principal sin aparente razón. El catálogo del ministerio sigue manteniendo la misma denominación.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mapper65363 (2022-12-31 13:26:04+00:00): Hallo,
gibt es einen Grund, warum du am ROB für jede Halteposition einen weiteren Knoten für den Wartebereich (public_transport=platform) hinzugefügt hast? Bisher war dieser Tag schon als Linie eingezeichnet, wodurch nun eine Doppelkartierung entstanden ist.
Emilius123 (2022-11-25 00:24:55+00:00): n entfernt
DressyPear4 (2022-12-08 15:49:47+00:00): Olá, não é correto adicionar esse contorno cobrindo a cidade inteira, você está informando que é tudo residencial mas tambem existem áreas comerciais e industriais, sem contar as praças e áreas naturais em seu interior
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129346919
danlessa (2022-12-08 18:29:03+00:00): Bom dia @DressyPear4, segui a prática que observei na região próxima para denotar áreas urbanas. O wiki é explicito em dizer que áreas mistas devem ser marcadas como sendo residencial.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse

"For "Mixed-Use" areas where more than half of the land is residential, tag as residential.". Posso confirmar que a mancha urbana é mais do que 70% residencial e o comércio está tudo misturado com ela.

Adicionalmente, é informado que a tag `landuse` é para mapear áreas grandes e não é para uso granular, portanto não vejo conflito em ter mistura com as praças e áreas naturais.
Glassman (2022-11-25 20:49:34+00:00): It looks like you duplicated the path leading into the park. I removed the duplicate section.

Can you review the boundaries for the park? It looks from the imagery that it extends to the fence on the west side.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129347149
Supaplex (2022-11-25 02:47:21+00:00): It seems already one that exists nearby. Do they change location of the visitor information center?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129347516
merylstreet (2022-11-25 09:54:26+00:00): good point, didn't see the other one on the map. I know for sure the one I saw was on the left hand side when entering the station, so probably it changed location
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129347516
Vid the Kid (2022-11-25 21:36:06+00:00): Drone video here: https://youtu.be/hS4LVn_0BgM
Glassman (2022-11-25 20:52:44+00:00): #TIP: service roads are not usually named. However if it is signed then it would be appropriate to be named 223rd Place Southeast.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129347611
DressyPear4 (2022-11-25 15:17:02+00:00): Olá, não crie edições fictíceas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129347622
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-25 02:26:13+00:00): All rails removed have been fully built over by new roads, parking lots and buildings.

These features do not exist (at least anymore).

If they existed at one point in time, they should be drawn on OHM since they no longer exist and no trace can be found on the ground.
mueschel (2022-12-01 19:25:00+00:00): Hi,
the socket tags you used on this node are not in use in any other place. Please check the wiki to find out what the correct tags are.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
felipeeugenio (2022-11-26 12:55:05+00:00): Estimado. tiene evidencia de la creación de esa calle y parque? no aparece en ninguna foto satelital. Y hay algunas bastante recientes.
saludos
Stretch Longfellow (2022-11-26 17:41:18+00:00): See comment I just gave you on a different issue. You seem to be confusing trunk and expressway. It's a relatively recent change to the standards, but it is one that needs to be used.

Trunk roads do not need to be undivided. However, if you feel that this is best left as primary, please eliminate the trunk spur further north to MO D.
stlmapper74 (2022-11-26 18:51:30+00:00): Yes, this I would contend that the trunk classification would be only north of Manchester and all the way to 270.
Stretch Longfellow (2022-11-26 17:41:37+00:00): See comment I just gave you on a different issue. You seem to be confusing trunk and expressway. It's a relatively recent change to the standards, but it is one that needs to be used.
jayhawker6 (2022-11-28 05:49:29+00:00): Another private tag on what would appear to be a publicly accessible road?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129349292
ianlopez1115 (2022-11-28 09:10:43+00:00): Private tag on the gates appear to be justified, was in the area in February 2020 and access to and from Lakewood (area in question) is controlled if not restricted by security personnel. Also, ways 115446399 and 115446453 should not have been divided.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129349292
jayhawker6 (2022-11-28 13:50:37+00:00): The ways appear to have a justification for being divided (divider is physical separation + island, and both roads seem like they are 1 way for each respective section), and the oneway tagging on them seems correct.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129349292
CaluequeDam (2022-12-05 08:12:15+00:00): Hello jayhawker6, I agree with ianlopez1115 that the access here should be private. Please note that my edit was only adding access=private tags to the gates so that their access would be consistent with the ways behind them.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-26 14:26:44+00:00): Hi, you have retagged
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133755149
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117037279
to leisure=horse_riding, but they look like riding arenas which should be tagged as leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena

You have used Swedish presets and Vespucci; maybe the Swedish translation is wrong. Can you please check that? I don't know Swedish and I havn't used Vespucci yet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-25 04:45:23+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=32.557637%2C-97.380573%2C17.63
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Lancelotance (2022-11-30 11:42:24+00:00): 我们永远铭记您的不朽贡献！
Lancelotance 于永州市江永县
mariotomo (2022-11-25 07:32:53+00:00): hola. has leído la página wiki sobre los buenos comentarios?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
157 (2022-11-25 05:23:56+00:00): Oops. Go Map used the same changeset comment as last time. Correction: Bridge on Central Ave is now open as per survey.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
Vencallium (2022-11-25 05:40:06+00:00): forget about the part in antarctica
Glassman (2022-11-25 20:55:45+00:00): #TIP: save and upload your edit before moving to a distant location. If you ever need to come back to revise your work large changesets are difficult to review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129350994
streinger (2022-11-27 16:00:19+00:00): можно объяснить смысл данной правки?  я удалил дубли и вернул как всё было, вы снова удаляете теги, потом снова  правка и....., опять возвращаете как было.
112orenburg1 (2022-11-28 04:21:09+00:00): потому что тестировали
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-26 12:12:29+00:00): In case of trying again: why https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10210140459/history was mapped as operational water point and nonfunctional at the same time?
deepblue66 (2022-11-26 08:12:47+00:00): Warum noexit=yes gelöscht? Warum Parkplatz gelöscht?
pitfire (2022-11-26 10:51:57+00:00): Es handelt sich nach eigener vor Ort Besichtigung um ein privates Grundstück/Hinterhof mit Stellplätzen.
noexit=yes ist kein NOTAUS um die OSMI routing warnings zu vermeiden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
RaphaelPasloin (2022-12-03 00:49:12+00:00): Non existing buildings , your changeset has been reverted.
IW2222 (2022-11-25 07:25:25+00:00): Correction: East section, not west section. Also, I removed outdated source tags on many tracks (they have been completely realigned to newer imagery).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
OldManCelli (2022-12-01 14:05:01+00:00): Levina Chan, Can you explain what you are attempting to map here? These shapes don't seem to represent anything visible in the satellite imagery.
DP24PH (2022-11-30 00:03:25+00:00): ADDENDUM:

DP24 #DPresearch #Mapping101 #Luzon ALERT: [ #NCL #MegaManila #SouthernTagalog #Bicol ] #SMXManila capacity info + missing surveillance, ACU tagging addendum + route recalibration fixes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-26 01:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129386858 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a problematic import.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-November/007080.html and rest of thread.
ALu68 (2022-11-27 09:10:09+00:00): Hello felixi,

Again you used special characters for the building values. "+" "++" "#" "###"

Please check your edits.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ofS
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ofU
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ofW
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ofY
Discostu36 (2022-11-25 07:26:22+00:00): sorry, I meant that I removed ref from name
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
LuxuryCoop (2022-11-25 10:09:36+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
oba510 (2022-11-25 08:07:37+00:00): Hi, I'm wondering where you got the name "Behrens Way" from?  As far as I can tell this is just part of Spokane Ave. south of the county line and Behrens Ave. north of it.
eggie (2022-11-25 08:26:45+00:00): Dag MI Hier lijkt iets niet helemaal goed te zijn gegaan. 
Dat kun je hier zien.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129355446

Wat was je bedoeling.
Je hebt de landuse grass meegenomen en aan het kruispunt geplakt.. Met welke bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-25 08:30:08+00:00): Ik heb die uitschieter landuse=grass losgemaakt van de kruising en weer teruggelegd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-25 08:31:56+00:00): Weet je zeker dat het een highway=track is..(dus geschikt voor autoverkeer).of is het wellicht een highway=path zoals het verdere vervolg?
eggie (2022-11-25 08:46:23+00:00): Ik heb er een highway=path van gemaakt. Het zou anders gaan routeren voor autoverkeer. 
Is hier dan een nieuwe track aangelegd?
-MT- (2022-11-25 08:54:19+00:00): Bedankt, ik had het even snel gedaan.
Het is een paadje langs de oude spoorlijn, ligt er al heel lang.
eggie (2022-11-25 08:59:17+00:00): Klopt MT.. Nuttige aanvulling.

Elk begin is moeilijk... vooral met editor iD . Die plakt al snel alles aan elkaar. Soort ingebouwde lijm. 
Plakken kun je voorkomen door tijdens tekenen de linker alttoets in te drukken. Dan plakt er niets vast.
 
Denk dat het nu wel goed is.

Bedankt voor je reactie.
eggie
bxl-forever (2022-11-25 16:12:41+00:00): Hello,

Nice first edit, thanks.

Just one thing: if you want to draw small objects like this, be sure to give them a proper shape.  3 of 4 of those swimming pools here are perfect rectangles on imagery, so it’s best to draw real rectangles instead of fuzzy shapes.  In the online editor, you can right-click on a shape and use the "square" option to improve it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 18:55:45+00:00): Dodałem office=geodesist.

Przy okazji poprawiłem wielkość liter w nazwie. Na OpenStreetMap nie piszemy nazw z dużych liter.

Pozdrawiam!
PCarew_EG (2023-01-31 21:03:28+00:00): All of these relations are still referenced in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Transportation#Tram_lines

Are you able to update the wiki?
user_10241830 (2023-01-31 21:20:27+00:00): Hello,

those pages are outdated and no longer maintained, because we now have automated analysis of public transport lines via PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/), but I deleted the links anyway.

It appears that there are still a few collective relations left over, and those probably need to be deleted as well.
abakus_uploader (2022-11-25 23:31:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gecho111 (2022-11-25 22:00:45+00:00): That street name is absolutely wrong. A north designation is part street addresses, not the street itself.
Nadzeya_ (2022-11-28 14:13:10+00:00): @gecho111 Could you clarify what this road should be named?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129356549
bxl-forever (2022-11-25 15:00:25+00:00): Hello,

I am trying to review your changeset.
I am afraid to announce you there are several issues here.  I understand you are doing your first edits, it’s never easy to start.

Those guidelines may help.
(I write in English because it is easier for me but you can reply in any language.)

1) By default, places like gardens or swimming pools are public.  People use OSM-based apps to look for the nearest place where they can have a walk or swim.  Be sure to add "access=private" tag on them if those are private places, that way they will not be advertised to passers-by.

2) Houses: very important: all the buildings in Brussels are already on the map.  Please never try to redraw them.  Here is the reason: the building shape we show on OSM is the real outline of the building.  In the online editor you can find this in the UrbisAdm layer on the Background menu.  Please never redraw buildings by tracing on aerial imagery.  Those are taken during yearly cartography flights and buildings are never shown top-down properly on those pictures.  I had to undo all your edits along Avenue Coloniale/Kolonialelaan and Rue de l'Abreuvoir/Hondenwetstraat because buildings were away from their real locations.
If there are new buildings, of if you are not sure, you can always create a note on the map.

3) It’s always a good idea to make smaller edits.  If you add a couple of gardens and a zebra crossing on a street, stop there and upload that, and then start drawing on another place.  This makes reviewing much easier.

That being said, I really appreciate that you write good changeset comments to describe your changes, this is fine.

Have a nice day.
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 15:28:44+00:00): To skrzyżowanie oznaczyłeś okej.

Dodałem jeszcze tylko direction w każdą stronę. I oznaczyłem przejście jako "raised": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129373588
Josef73 (2022-12-24 06:04:47+00:00): Hello, can you check for "Boucherie Guissa" the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks
Nakaner (2022-12-02 15:25:26+00:00): Hi,

participating in Maproulette challenge 29558 is considered a mechanical edit. Please stop participating. Such edits have to be discussed with the OSM community in advance. However, nobody started the discussion.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards

Michael