piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:05:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Please map more accurate, square your buildings and map buildings individually. (none of your mappings are squared)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304193
archie (2021-10-09 15:18:09+00:00): 1) You are obviously not familiar w the swedish language. Do you know what "Tillverkningsindustri" means?
2) Do not move things previously edited to wrong position. Do adjust your background properly as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery. Your items are currently falsly aligned.
D5221 (2021-10-10 13:12:40+00:00): No offence meant regarding "Tillverkningsindustri". If I made a mistake, please be a bit more concrete.
I will make sure to read “https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery” to get my alignment correct. Thanks for the heads up.
archie (2021-10-10 13:49:32+00:00): Tillverkningsindustri means industry (where items are produced). So you should not put this word to an area/building which you already tagged as industry. This is not a name. Would you be nice to delete this, thanks.
D5221 (2021-10-10 14:03:30+00:00): Thanks, I have removed the name. I see you are an experienced contributor to OSM, and if I have moved anything out of place, please let me know. I will avoid changing existing features unless I have on site data on hand in the future.
archie (2021-10-10 14:17:00+00:00): Thanks, this sounds fine. Please read about the imagery adjustment. The core thing is, you have to adjust the image-background. Enjoy the serious editing of osm!
D5221 (2021-10-10 14:25:23+00:00): Will do. And I’m sure I will enjoy contribution to OSM – I love maps 😊 Thanks again for your help.
Frans S (2021-10-10 09:00:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
See my comments on another changeset.
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304352
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:15:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Square each building with the Q key.
The lowest building is smaller than you mapped it. 
Look carefully where the color changes.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304435
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:13:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

Please pay attention on these points:
You map a bit irrigular. Please check the shadow  of a building (don't include it in your mapping) and map more accurate.
Each building has to be mapped individual and  squared with the Q key
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://swww.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304494
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:18:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
You mapped a building twice . Do not connect buildings to each other with their nodes.
The building on the left side is much cmaller than your mapping , in fact it are 3 small buildings. Look to the shadows.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304645
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:30:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
You collect several buildings and mapped them as 1 building.
Each building needs to be squared with the Q key
I revert the collected mappings. They must be mapped again. Sorry.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304823
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:21:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Your mappings are very irregular. A building is mostly strict rectangular an can be mapped with 4 nodes or 6 when it is rectangular>
I have to revert your mappings here. It cost more time to correct them rather than map them again.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304956
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:28:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112304965
zvenzzon (2021-11-29 08:19:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991503366 är mig veterligen avspärrad med stängsel och grindar. Jag är tveksam om den ska anses tillhöra Hosjöjungfrustigen eller ens vara residential. Ska se om jag kan åka förbi och kolla.
osmviborg (2021-10-09 15:38:20+00:00): detaljer ( -‿◦)
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-09 22:32:59+00:00): Hallo flo2154,

wurden diese Massenedits irgendwo diskutiert? Normalerweise sollen solche Änderungen nicht gemacht werden ohne dass vor Ort überprüft wird, ob es es das Objekt überhaupt noch gibt.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
flo2154 (2021-10-11 19:35:23+00:00): Hallo Roger,

nein, die Änderungen wurden nicht mit anderen diskutiert. Hintergrund ist dieser Pull Request, der die häufigsten ATM-Operators pro Land gesammelt hat: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/pull/3352

Da mir dort viele Duplikate aufgefallen sind, habe ich ein paar der Operator-Werte, für die es bereits einen NSI-Eintrag gibt, zusammengefasst. Andere Operators hätte ich nicht geändert.

Das Argument, dass es die ATMs vor Ort nicht mehr geben könnte, ist aber tatsächlich valide. Könnte ein (diskutierter) automatisierter Edit die Änderungszeit der Elemente gleich lassen? Dann würde z.B. StreetComplete nach 2 Jahren wieder nach der Existenz des Objekts fragen.

Andererseits: Würde ein Revert dieses Changesets die Änderungszeit auch wieder zurücksetzen? Ansonsten wäre ja der Status Quo besser, da zumindest die Operator-Werte aufgeräumt sind.

Auf jeden Fall lasse ich aber weitere ähnliche Änderungen erstmal sein :)

Viele Grüße
Flo
Nakaner-repair (2021-10-13 11:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112459293 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit (application of Name Suggestion Index on whole Germany without prior discussion)
Nakaner (2021-10-13 12:02:49+00:00): Hallo,

wegen der fehlenden Durchführung der Diskussion handelt es sich um einen unzulässigen mechanischen Edit. Das Ziel des Automated Edits Code of Conduct ist es, das Gleichgewicht wiederherzustellen bzw. zu bewahren, das durch das massenhafte Bearbeiten gestört wird. Durch massenhaftes Bearbeiten kann ein einzelner seine Ansichten in der Datenbank mit überschaubarem Aufwand durchdrücken. Reverts undiskutierter mechanischer Edits sind deshalb das richtige Mittel, um der Community die Gelegenheit zu geben, die Änderungen in Ruhe und ohne schon geschaffene Fakten erörtern zu können.

Ich habe deshalb den Revert dieses und vergleichbarer Änderungssätze begonnen.

Ich möchte darauf hinweisen, dass Diskussion im GitHub-Issue-Tracker des Name Suggestion Index keine Diskussionen im Sinne der Organised Editing Guideline, des Automated Edits Code of Conduct und der Import-Regeln sind. Die Plattform zwingt Mapper zum Abschluss eines Vertrags (Nutzungsbedinungen) mit einem Dritten, darüber hinaus ist sie nicht in der ortsüblichen Sprache verfügbar, die im betroffenen Gebiet üblich ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
flo2154 (2021-10-13 17:35:12+00:00): Hallo Michael,

in Ordnung, danke für die Erläuterung.

Nur eine kleine Berichtigung: Das war nicht der Issue-Tracker des Name Suggestion Index, sondern von StreetComplete.

Kannst du die beiden Fragen aus meinem letzten Kommentar beantworten?

Viele Grüße
Flo
Frans S (2021-10-10 09:07:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings will be reverted due to the inaccuacy and weird mapping.
Please pay attention on these points:
Map more accurate. Improve your mapping skills before uploading your work.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305558
Frans S (2021-10-09 15:35:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
See my comments on previous changeset.
I revert this mapping. Needs to be mapped again.
Please map more accurate

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305669
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:02:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305678
Frans S (2021-10-10 09:04:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305714
Frans S (2021-10-10 09:04:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please do not include a yard next to a building in your mapping.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305790
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:39:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings will be reverted due to the poor quality.
Please pay attention on these points:
a: Improve your mapping skills. A rectangular building consist out of 4 nodes. An L shaped building out of 6.
You added a number of times an extra node in the middle of a building. Don't you use a mouse to map precise?
Each building needs to be mapped individually and follow the rooflines.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305856
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:55:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Your mappings are not accurate and squared.
Each building needs to be mapped separately .
Please improve your mapping skills .

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305856
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:30:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 

Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or features.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305909
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:28:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

Please pay attention on these points:
Your mappings are not that accurate and not squared.
Please look for a shadow next to a trace. A shadow proofs that the object is above groundlevel, mostly a building.
Do not combine a number of buildings into 1 mapping . Each building should be mapped individually.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112305935
NieWnen (2021-10-10 13:18:00+00:00): Jak światła są w ten sposób uszczegóławiane, to chyba powinien zniknąć ten środkowy węzeł.
NieWnen (2021-10-10 13:19:07+00:00): *To odnośnie Grzybowska/Żelazna.
Tetryk (2021-10-11 08:17:37+00:00): Racja, przegapiłem, poprawiłem
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:23:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112306367
rempshaener (2021-10-09 18:11:02+00:00): Hallo,
du hast die sog. Alte Batterie heute als "battlefield" angelegt.
Ein "battlefield" ist es m.E. nicht (auch wenn aus der Batterie in Richtung Düsseldorf geschossen wurde), auch die Position stimmt nicht ganz - siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4804601521, die Lage ist insgesamt eher https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178774526. Ich fände es am besten, wenn du den Node wieder entfernen würdest...
Viele Grüße
Glg11 (2021-10-10 01:41:25+00:00): Hi, hab den Node in eine Informationstafel abgeändert, die dort am Wegesrand steht. Hab vor Ort in Vespucci nicht gesehen, dass der Wald bereits als battlefield markiert ist.
Danke für deinen Hinweis.
rempshaener (2021-10-10 09:54:27+00:00): Danke
Kraan46 (2021-10-09 16:11:24+00:00): Please read the comments in the Tasking Manager on task 165.
rainerU (2021-10-11 11:58:49+00:00): Hallo cortauri,

bei Tempobegrenzungen ist es immer hilfreich, wenn man mit source:maxspeed angibt, wodurch sich die Begrenzung ergibt. Bei Tempo 30 wäre das entweder source:maxspeed=sign (Verkehrszeichen) oder source:maxspeed=DE:zone30 (Straße liegt in einer 30er-Zone).

Grüße
Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112306667
Frans S (2021-10-10 08:21:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.
Keep in mind that the shadow of the building you map should not be included in the mappings.
And be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112307055
eggie (2021-10-09 16:26:04+00:00): Hi persimengo,

You are asking for feedback
Hint:  Where the ways cross the outline they should be connected to it with a shared node.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge

Greetz,
eggie
Pontius (2021-10-09 16:24:19+00:00): At least as far as I can tell from the satellite imagery.
nmombo12 (2021-10-21 13:00:52+00:00): Hello, it looks like the wrong way was selected along Fairgrove Ave for the change to footway. I have reverted that part of the changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8694877/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112307790
Nakaner-repair (2021-10-13 11:59:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112459293 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit (application of Name Suggestion Index on whole Germany without prior discussion)
MapAbility (2021-10-10 04:25:59+00:00): Did you remove the relation for the Mullum Mullum trail. Now it ends at Reynolds Road and the starts again at Heidelberg Warrandyte road, there's a big gap in the middle
SpecializedRider (2021-10-10 09:09:57+00:00): Fixed in changeset 112320715.
highflyer74 (2021-10-10 08:53:10+00:00): Moin!

Danke für Deine Änderung. Kleiner Hinweis: dieses Objekt wird nach wie vor als Restaurant erkannt. Es reicht nicht, den Namen zu entfernen. Wir machen so etwas am besten, in dem wir (sofern vorhanden) neue Daten, wie z.B. ein neues Restaurant dort eintragen oder aber, wenn der Laden leer steht, das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix setzen. In diesem Fall hieße dies disused:amenity=restaurant. Alle nicht mehr zutreffenen Tags können entfernt werden. Ein description=* ist nicht notwendig, da dies nur als Info für den Endanwender bei bestehenden Objekten gilt. Möchtest Du selbst versuchen, es entsprechend zu ändern, oder soll ich assistieren? Viele Grüße!
DressyPear4 (2021-10-09 18:49:35+00:00): Olá adicione apenas o que existe na realidade.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112308141
636663 (2022-05-03 15:02:31+00:00): 在中国大陆和台湾，主要供特定产业使用、水泥铺装或未铺装的产业道路、农路、林路等应该标记为highway=track，尤其是不适合一般机动车辆的陡峭、泥泞或危险道路，可能只能供高底盘、四轮驱动车辆、机车、自行车或步行通行。
636663 (2022-05-03 15:03:10+00:00): 参见：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
salvoconducto (2021-10-09 17:36:00+00:00): Please don't call a changeset "Polygon added" if you rightfully deleted and remapped buildings: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112309813
salvoconducto (2021-10-09 17:49:55+00:00): Hi MMR Clemon,

is there a link to your internship project?
MMR Clemon (2021-10-09 17:54:53+00:00): https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/11524/tasks/