piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abrensch (2022-08-21 12:07:48+00:00): Hallo Raa39,

Die Baustelle A1 beim Mehring Richtung Saarbrücken ist fertig, jetzt ist neuer Bauabschnitt Richtung Köln. Mit kaum Einschränkungen, nur die Abfahrt Mehring aus Richtung Saarbrücken ist gesperrt.

Kannst Du das anpassen? Ich bin dazu nicht in der Lage, weil da mindestens auch FlixBus-Relationen verlegt wurden.

Ziemlich dickes Brett finde ich um eine simple Autobahnbaustelle einzutragen, und viel sinnlose Arbeit.

Vielleicht können wir es für den neuen Bauabschnitt beim wesentlichen belassen, also bei der Sperre der Abfahrt?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Supaplex (2022-02-08 08:03:56+00:00): Hi,

It seems that many parking areas should be combined into a bigger parking area. Do you have local knowledge to to your editing or just tracing satelite image tracing?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116924400
Frans S (2022-02-04 11:31:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here .
You mapped quite a lot of traces on the ground as buildings which are just pieces of farmland, trees or something else.
Please look for paths leading to them and a shadow next to an object which proofs that it is above groundlevel and thus a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
LacoCZ (2022-02-04 15:00:14+00:00): Hello Frans, thank you for checking the map and also for very good hint. I will make sure to avoid these mistakes next time I am mapping
Dimitar155 (2022-02-25 08:42:52+00:00): Здравей Яница,

Благодарности за добавянето на тази информация. Имам само две бележки: имената на улиците се изписват без кавички и без ул. пред името. За детските градини и училищата, не е нужно да слагаш имена на сградите, ако името е сложено на областта около съответния обект. Ако имаш някакви въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави,
Митко
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116925462
trial (2022-12-21 14:46:23+00:00): correction des tags ? Il ne reste pas un peu de boulot car qualifier la gare de Redon comme arrêt de bus, ça s'appelle dérailler :-D.
mga_geo (2022-12-21 15:48:36+00:00): Je viens de rétablir la situation, en fin je l'espère.
trial (2022-12-21 16:06:03+00:00): Je ne dis pas qu'il n'y a pas d'erreur mais que je n'en vois pas ! 👍
trial (2022-12-21 16:07:43+00:00): Sinon côté liens wiki, j'aurais tendance à les laisser uniquement au niveau de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2120962 mais c'est un peu une histoire de goût.
Sandal man (2022-02-14 14:25:28+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus ediciones, pero ¿qué son estas líneas sin etiquetas?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226608245
user_5359 (2022-02-04 08:14:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(nwr%5B%22The%22%5D%3B)%3B(._%3B%3E%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=40.13584;32.2675;18&R .
What is the meaning of the tag "The" = "Prince"?
katpatuka (2022-02-04 08:25:38+00:00): thanks for the notice - removed inadvertently pasted tags.
RicoElectrico (2022-02-03 18:50:16+00:00): Cześć, proszę na przyszłość o nieprzyklejanie dróg do granic administracyjnych (oraz innych obszarów jak lasy, zabudowa) przy ich rysowaniu. Dzięki
Jacek Duda (2022-02-03 19:00:04+00:00): Odwzorowałem je najdokładniej jak mogłem. Mieszkam w jednym z tych domów i sami z sąsiadami tę drogę budowaliśmy. Jeśli gdziekolwiek je przykleiłem że zrobiłem to nieświadomie i przepraszam. Jak widzisz że to mój pierwszy raz.
Konkon153 (2022-02-02 17:45:31+00:00): [ und damit alle 1.357 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Sternberg vollständig angepasst ]
trial (2024-10-13 12:05:43+00:00): Salut,
rattrapé par la police ;-)
https://gauss.whz.de/ptsa/#10/47.6917/-3.2849
mga_geo (2024-10-13 15:14:23+00:00): Avec Osmose et PTNA, j'ai déjà trop d'outils par rapport à ma capacité à jardiner.
wkdgs (2022-03-02 12:26:05+00:00): Hi,

durch das Löschen der Fußwege sind Informationen verloren gegangen.

* An der Kentuckyallee fehlt, die Informationen, dass es dort einen Bürgersteig gibt.

* An Kentuckyallee und Lousianaring fehlt die Oberflächeninformation "surface=paving_stones" für den Bürgersteig.

Könntest du diese Infos wieder hinzufügen?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116929469
Scout Jens (2022-03-03 12:13:16+00:00): Hallo winkeldings, 

ich habe die Infos hier ergänzt
Änderungssatz: 118053737

Grüße
Patr1k_P (2022-02-03 22:11:12+00:00): Používaj prosím zmysluplnejsi komentar k sadám.. (co je doplnené?) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
attili1 (2022-04-18 07:21:13+00:00): Hi Rajeswari
PolyDunami (2022-02-02 18:13:50+00:00): The addresses were added using Whatcom County's tax parcel viewer.
attili1 (2022-04-18 05:14:13+00:00): Thanks for adding
peruri (2022-04-18 05:45:27+00:00): HI rajeswari,
peruri (2022-04-18 05:59:27+00:00): hello rajeswari garu
peruri (2022-04-18 08:35:08+00:00): Thanks for editing.
Mudumala (2022-04-18 05:06:55+00:00): Correcting the unstructured landuse=residential polygons in KH, https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/111
kartler175 (2022-02-03 11:06:10+00:00): Bitte sorgfältiger. Flächen können sionst nicht gerender werden:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.78701&lat=54.10286&zoom=11&opacity=0.95
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-09 23:07:12+00:00): a road was deleted here too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306619785#map=19/13.45565/-86.40643
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 19:26:44+00:00): Hallo,
du hast vor 3 Jahren diesen Weg verändert. Dort ist jetzt ein oneway=yes wo nur noch Fußgänger gehen dürfen. Stimmt das tatsächlich?
forstner-m (2025-02-03 11:14:56+00:00): Hallo,
würdest du mir bitte die Nummer von dem Weg geben. Ich sehe nicht heraus, welchen Weg du meinst.
Danke!
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-04 19:59:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270290401#map=19/48.665944/13.982346&layers=N
forstner-m (2025-02-04 20:08:59+00:00): Vielen Dank! Der Weg ist sehr schmal. Es kann hier kein Fahrrad, Auto oder Traktor fahren. Passt das dann?
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-04 20:17:27+00:00): Die Breite eines Weges kannst du mit width=* angeben. 
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:width und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxwidth:physical

Das oneway=yes ist wohl ein Fehler. Ich werde es löschen. 
Dort ist auch bicycle=no und motor_vehicle=no getaggt. Wenn es dort nur zu eng ist, aber kein Fahrverbot gilt, dass tragen wir das üblicherweise auch nicht so ein, weil wir nur die rechtlichen Verbote eintragen. Ein Router wird sowieso aufgrund der schmalen Breite und der schlechten Wegbeschaffenheit (du könntest noch smoothness=* ergänzen) dort kein Auto und kein Rad durchschicken.
forstner-m (2025-02-04 20:54:55+00:00): oneway=yes ist natürlich ein Unfug. Danke für die Reparatur!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-08 11:51:39+00:00): Por favor, no agregue características ficticias.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116931365
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments
eggie (2022-02-02 19:20:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   De nametag niet gebruiken voor omschrijvingen.
Haal je name=..... weg?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-02 19:26:03+00:00): name= verwijderd en/of aangepast naar description=
SherbetS (2022-04-22 15:26:13+00:00): hello xem0861,

on this object,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9469437752

you used the tag man_made=communications_tower when in reality it is actually man_made=mast + tower:type=communication

I understand that this is likely caused by the confusing nature of the JOSM plugin, but please use the correct tagging in the future.

thanks,
SherbetS
Andre68 (2022-02-02 19:48:49+00:00): Why do you edit coastlines while you don't know how...?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-02-03 14:27:22+00:00): I do fix the warnings and errors when uploading on Jsom till they are repaired
vng_me (2022-02-03 20:47:00+00:00): Coastlines are bad. At least what is it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002470379
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-02-09 04:20:11+00:00): The coastlines are bad because they are  connected by other ways to form relations of bodies of water
tux67 (2022-02-03 07:04:36+00:00): kleiner Hinweis für alle Date Einträge:
Das Datum wird nach  ISO 8601 im Format JJJJ-MM-TT geschrieben.
Ich nehme an das start_date bezieht sich auf due Baustelle, opening_date für den Kindergartenbetrieb war ja schon da.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116932394
emergency99 (2022-02-02 21:11:54+00:00): Gibt es das Gleis?

Wenn es nur ein Test für etwas sein soll, bitte nicht hier in Produktion einzeichnen.

Es gibt einen Testserver und OSM-Daten können auch offline bearbeitet werden ohne upload.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
RobinD. (emergency99)
emergency99 (2022-02-02 21:09:07+00:00): Hallo,

gibt es da eine Tram? Wenn nicht, bitte nicht auf der OSM am Hauptserver eintragen. Für development gibt es einen Testserver.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
RobinD (emergency99)
n76 (2022-02-03 00:32:23+00:00): Hi, Your change set comment really does not say what it was that you were improving. And looking at the edit I don't see any substantial change either. Can you be a little more clear about what your edit is about?

Thanks!
scabiosa_trenta (2022-09-27 05:50:08+00:00): The section "razvojna os 3A" from "razcep Malence" to at least Škofljica is very outdated. It is an old proposal (in fact merely a concept, not even a plan), however according to the most recent proposal the splitting point will be near highway exit Rudnik with road continuing west of railway completely bypassing Lavrica.
scabiosa_trenta (2022-09-27 05:55:50+00:00): One of the most recent proposals is depicted here: https://www.delo.si/lokalno/ljubljana-in-okolica/ze-pokopano-skofljisko-obvoznico-bi-obudili-od-mrtvih/

Still, it is just a distant proposal, not a plan, and I believe this is not enough to include it in the OSM.
PolyDunami (2022-02-02 19:35:52+00:00): Addresses added according to Whatcom County's tax parcel viewer.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-06 19:54:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Generally if a building has multiple uses only the address goes on the building and the businesses are separate nodes especially since this building has multiple businesses.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116933013
eggie (2022-02-02 20:35:04+00:00): Dag Quodvide

Het gebied van je edits is zo groot omdat je het fietspad hebt verbonden met de landuse=residential van Zaandam. Ik heb het even losgemaakt.
MVG
eggie
Jeff Underwood (2022-02-03 19:47:39+00:00): Hello OrDal,

These relations mark lines of contention that exist in the real world. The intent is not to make judgement on the validity of any particular claim, dispute, or reference line, only to accurately document them. Additionally, these relations will not affect anything as far as rendering goes unless a data consumer actively builds support for them.

I'm happy to chat about these with you further as I understand these can be very sensitive, in the meantime I'm going to restore them though.

-Jeff
OrDal (2022-02-03 22:41:01+00:00): Dear Jeff,
First, I don't think OSM is the place for this information. This should be somewhere else (Wikipedia?).
Also, the information you added is not accurate - for example:
1. The Palestinian Authority has never declared desirable border lines (and generaly, their desire is to establish an arab state over all the Israeli territories). Unfortunately, many people in the western world are unaware of this fact and continue to believe in the 1967-borders-tale that has no basis.
2. Regarding the border between Israel and Syria - currenty, it is not possible for Syria to regain the territories that Israel occupied in 1967 and there is no point in continuing to state that the Golan is occupied Syrian territory.
3. The boundaries of the districts in Israel (admin_level=4) are not disputed. Although there are countries that do not recognize the existence of Israel, they do not dispute with the administrative division within Israel.
Regards, Or
Jeff Underwood (2022-02-04 19:04:27+00:00): Hello OrDal,

I appreciate you taking the time to reply.

1. In some cases, the dispute names may be somewhat imprecise and are there to just help clarify what they represent. Some borders or claims are recognized by other countries while the “claimant” themselves has undefined or broader claims themselves. 
2. Border disputes are almost always cases such as this. Although some are active conflict zones, the majority are simply stated disagreements over a territory. In this case, Syria still claims the territory and many countries of the world still recognize it as occupied territory. The relation is not adding legitimacy to the claim, instead, trying to reflect the complex reality of the world. 
3. These sorts of relations are admittedly a little weird looking. In this case, it is Palestine not acknowledging the districts of Israel. Instead, the relation marks them as admin_level=8 for Palestine specifically to lower their prominence. The other countries are defined explicitly as still having admin_level=4 just for completeness. 

User nvk has two great diaries detailing this work that you may find interesting here 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nvk/diary/390496

Wikipedia documents these disputes of course, but it is not a geographic database. OpenStreetMap is increasingly the primary datasource for the world’s maps and having complete administrative data is a pretty important part of that. “On the ground” is a good policy for mapping country borders, but the laws and expectations of various countries make this not a complete solution for downstream users. Dispute relations can fill in this gap while being unobtrusive and invisible to the majority of users.

Our main source for mapping these is the free datasource Natural Earth which you can peruse here if you are interested. It is a collaborative effort and the disputes are still pretty new so if you see issues or mistakes you can report them to the GitHub for corrections. NE is a low resolution datasource that is meant for big picture maps, while this mapping project helps to create OSM data that can take over for high resolution maps. 

https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors/10m-admin-0-breakaway-disputed-areas/

-Jeff
ovruni (2022-02-03 00:11:28+00:00): Hola Renzuin, en la conversación del conjunto de cambios 116843996 le había comentado que esos datos no son verificables y usted ha comentado primero que eran "parte de la confidencialidad de la empresa", luego de que es de "uso personal " y luego ha mostrando una fuente que no corrobora la información de los nombres. Sin embargo en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se han agregado dichos nombres, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116843996
VictorIE (2024-02-02 09:10:18+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289231360/history

Is this really a private street with both housing and a school?
Coirib (2024-02-04 20:23:45+00:00): Yea oddly enough there are two signs saying 'Private Road' at the entrance
BCNorwich (2022-02-04 08:39:15+00:00): Hi, You've got room level 1 Way: 1027120251 joined onto room level 2 Way: 1027124284. There are warnings of duplicate nodes and self-intersecting ways. Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/867xk3tm

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-02-04 08:41:50+00:00): There are also self-intersecting ways at Ashdown House to the SE of here.
kartonage (2022-02-03 08:10:53+00:00): Hej,

please check with other imagery before mass deleting features you don't see in one available imagery.  In this case check with Esri layer: these buildings are existent. Thanks

I have reverted this changeset.

Best regards
eggie (2022-02-02 20:38:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Het restaurant zit op hetzelfde adres.  Klopt dat nog?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Lekkernassuh (2022-02-04 12:15:00+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dankje!
Er zit geen restaurant bij/in Lekkernassuh op dit moment. Er werd altijd wel gekookt op woensdag via een open diner, maar dit kan vanwege corona maatregelen niet. Het is de vraag ook hoe dit terugkomt.
Gr Killian
eggie (2022-02-04 12:32:45+00:00): Tja... alles ongewis....
Gr eggie
aweech (2022-02-03 00:40:16+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you removed a perfectly good Class VI road. Does the town of Newport intend to discontinue it next month or something?
_dsm (2022-02-15 06:16:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment! We received feedback from the local user that this road does not exist. It is also not visible on the satellite images.
user_5359 (2022-04-11 05:36:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027132150. What is the meaning of religion=1?
MenKauRa (2022-12-18 18:12:11+00:00): OK
That's my fault..
should be "religion=muslim"
I'll fix it as soon as I can.
Thanks
streckenkundler (2022-02-04 17:22:12+00:00): Ich habe beim Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/273106908 wiederhergestellt.  network:type=node_network nicht löschen... Das ist zwingend erforderlich!

Mehr Informationen zu Knotenpunktnetzen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31239

Sven
Langlaeufer (2022-02-04 17:47:59+00:00): Sorry, war keine Absicht, ist wohl mit Eintragung der Ampel vom Editor entfernt worden.
streckenkundler (2022-02-04 18:10:46+00:00): Ah... Danke,

kann ich mir sehr gut vorstellen... iD hat an einigen Stellen sein Eigenleben... 

Danke... Ich beobachte mal weiter...

Aufmerksam geworden bin ich durch die Seite https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/de/networks

Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2022-02-04 20:35:35+00:00): zur Info... ich habe im Forum mal ein Beitrag geschrieben: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854418#p854418

Da lesen ja auch andere mit, die mit der Materie vertraut sind.

Viele Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
streckenkundler (2022-02-05 20:53:40+00:00): Hei,

noch zur Info... von dritter Seite ist bestätigt worden, daß hier ein Fehler in iD vorliegt! 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854477#p854477

Also Danke, daß du, wenn auch unwissentlich, diesen Fehler hervorgerufen hast, der nun abgestellt werden kann! 

Jeder beseitigte Fehler ist ein guter Fehler! :)

Viele Grüße,

Sven
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 21:45:32+00:00): Parece que saca la información de antiguos croquis municipales que no siempre son correctos https://icvficherosweb.icv.gva.es/doc_asociada_visor/internet/forestal/vias_pecuarias/fdvp/120043/CLASIFICACION/Plano.pdf)
eggie (2022-02-06 15:49:23+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116935504#map=9/52.1019/4.8594&layers=N

is de reinforced_slope nog intact.
Ik kijk weer even naar je laatste changeset
Beter nooit iets ergens in Muiden veranderen en dan naar Groningen gaan.. Beter zoiets in twee uploads doen.
Gr eggie
gscscnd (2022-02-03 07:38:38+00:00): Nowszy tag crossing=marked jest mniej precyzyjny niż crossing=uncontrolled. Z założenia miał oznaczać to samo, ale w praktyce jako crossing=marked są oznaczane zarówno przejścia z sygnalizacją świetlną, jak i te bez niej. Lepiej stosować stare i jednoznaczne tagi crossing=uncontrolled i crossing=traffic_signals. Zobacz też <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=821285#p821285>.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-02-03 08:53:36+00:00): Dwa różne tagi do tego samego z takim samym opisem - fajne, takie "do d...": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Skoro nowszy, to powinien być lepszy a tu wygląda na to, że tylko inny bo używany domyślnie przez inne narzędzie. Kolejny kamyczek do ogródka edytora ID - marked jest zaznaczany "chłopkiem" a uncontrolled "kropką w kółeczku". Ze swojej strony mogę jedynie obiecać, że tym z JOSM nie będę psuł tych uncontrolled (jest ich 1mln 250 tys.) a nowe w ID będę robił marked (ponad 1 mln 800 tys.).
Bardziej należałoby ścigać tych, którzy źle używają marked dla traffic_signals. Właśnie ostatnio poprawiałem WIELE uncontrolled, które powinny mieć traffic_signals. Może ktoś kto ma dojście do autora ID uświadomiłby mu, że takie "uncontrolled" są praktycznie nie do odróżnienia od traffic_signals, co dodatkowo utrudnia odnalezienie takich bubli a skoro są tożsame w sensie definicji na wiki OSM, to WŁAŚCIWYM jest pokazywanie ich w tożsamy sposób (marked=uncontrolled).
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-02-03 09:00:51+00:00): Korekta. Dodał w najnowszej wersji wyróżnienie traffic_signals, więc rozróżnienie traffic_signals i uncontrolled jest możliwe.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-02-03 09:03:23+00:00): Zgłosiłem: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8938
gscscnd (2022-02-03 14:20:00+00:00): Przejść z sygnalizacją błędnie oznaczonych uncontrolled zbyt wiele nie widziałem, a w szczególności nie widziałem takich zestawów zmian, w których traffic_signals byłoby zmieniane na uncontrolled. Natomiast widziałem wiele takich, w których wszystkie uncontrolled i traffic_signals były sprowadzane do marked (może to miałeś na myśli?).

W najnowszej wersji autorzy iD rzeczywiście podobno dodali traffic_signals, ale przez parę lat marked napsuło trochę danych. Ciężko to będzie naprawić, bo część przejść została skasowana i narysowana jako nowe obiekty. A nawet do pozostałych trzeba trochę chęci i pracy. A dopóki się tego nie zrobi, to nie będzie takie oczywiste, co w danym przypadku marked oznacza. Powinno być traktowane jako „traffic_signals lub uncontrolled”, tak jak building=yes, building=residential i building=house to kolejno coraz dokładniejsze tagi.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-08 10:56:39+00:00): Please try to match house size and shape better.
Try https://mapwith.ai/rapid for faster mapping. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RapiD
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116935633
djerm (2022-02-09 19:26:06+00:00): Sorry, I am just now realizing that people have been commenting on my changesets, and only just now found out the way to respond.

Moving forward. I will start mapping buildings per their outline, rather than using small squares.
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:15:05+00:00): Looks like you accidentally dragged a node across Veterans Park. I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116935639
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:17:11+00:00): And another one by the Issaquah Post Office
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116935639
wireguy (2022-02-17 13:33:19+00:00): NFZANMNIM, the boundary relation of Moore is broken, can you look at it?
NFZANMNIM (2022-02-17 15:24:36+00:00): Fixed this as well. Thanks for pointing it out.
nmombo12 (2022-02-04 15:16:43+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for contributing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936178