piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pkoby (2022-12-17 18:48:25+00:00): Hey Elliott,

I just saw these boundary markers when I was browsing on Organic Maps. They show up more prominently than I expect they should because they're tagged as historic=monument. Despite what they're called, osm usage of "monument" is for large things (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument). Would perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone be more accurate?
ElliottPlack (2022-12-21 14:53:50+00:00): Peter,

Thanks for your patience in my reply! I think you are right that this historic=boundary_stone is the better option here. I can change all of them.
ElliottPlack (2022-12-21 14:57:40+00:00): Done! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130337582
archpdx (2022-10-18 04:12:14+00:00): Thanks for adding these power pylons! I would either use Power Pole or High-Voltage Tower for these instead: Aerialway Pylons are used for pylons that support aerialways such as ski lifts (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway=pylon)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127681366
Lokai (2022-10-19 17:50:09+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM und schön, dass du dich zur Mitarbeit entschlossen hast.
Du hast eine Namensänderung eingetragen, wie kannst du den neuen Namen belegen?

Gruß

L.
John Hanover (2022-11-10 19:34:08+00:00): Reverted by changeset 128748170
John Hanover (2022-11-06 02:14:20+00:00): Hello JordanAK,

It looks like you have a disagreement about what name should be applied on the map to the mountains formerly known as the Suicide Peaks. The reason I changed the names to Yuyanq’ Ch’ex as opposed to the English translation is that this was the name decided upon by the US Board of Geographic Names and is also the name listed  in the Geographic Names Information System database maintained by the USGS, as a result Yuyanq’ Ch’ex, and not the English translation, is considered to be the official name for these peaks. 

I am open to communicating further with you on this issue. If I do not hear back from you within five days I intend to change the names back to Yuyanq’ Ch’ex.

Regards,
John Hanover
John Hanover (2022-11-10 19:34:45+00:00): Reverted by changeset 128748170.
micheleOSM3 (2023-08-18 07:41:41+00:00): Dove hai trovato riferimenti che il tratto è una ferrata? Il sito CAI dice che è un sentiero attrezzato, non una ferrata.
flak88 (2023-08-18 08:39:35+00:00): Ciao, la tipologia di quel tratto è al limite tra una ferrata facile ed un sentiero attrezzato difficile. Avendolo provato posso garantire che la complessità è tale per cui il mancato utilizzo di casco ed imbrago lo possono rendere molto pericoloso.
Non nego che ne possa aver sovrastimato la difficoltà, ma dalla definizione che il CAI fa delle ferrate a mio avviso può essere considerato tale: manca infatti il requisito di "salita in sicurezza". Ho valutato attentamente la modifica della mappa, ma sono disponibile a confronti e rivalutazioni se si trattasse di un errore (anche perchè da come ho capito per OSM non c'è una vera defizione di ferrata-tratto pericoloso). 
Ti giro il collegamento della foto della parete per una eventuale valutazione https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-50jYrS8WRGo/WTlyx8gPGUI/AAAAAAABCkA/LeSXtj7IedwCq3ACCQ3xDG601PeH4umMACLcB/s1600/%2528140%2529.jpg
micheleOSM3 (2023-08-18 09:04:44+00:00): Ok, grazie, provo a chiedere al CAI. Nel caso rimanesse una via_ferrata, sarebbe possibile impostare la via_ferrata-scale? Immagino sia circa una 3.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via_ferrata_scale)
micheleOSM3 (2023-08-18 20:26:37+00:00): Ho girato al CAI i tuoi commenti e hanno deciso di chiamarlo ferrata, vedi https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-9-prealpi-carniche/ferrata-alta-via-dei-rondoi/ ora faccio qualche aggiornamento al sentiero. Se hai tempo e voglia, potresti impostare il via_ferrata_scale nei 3 tratti ferrati, il CAI ha definito la difficoltà PD per tutti il sentiero che corrisponde a via_ferrata_scale che va da 1- a 1+, presumo che sia la difficoltà massima tra i 3 tratti ferrati. Ciao.
haiopei (2022-10-17 17:42:58+00:00): hier bitte den ursprünglichen Zweck der beiden Reste eines Viadukts beiderseits der A4 nachtragen, und den Namen, falls es einen hatte.
wkdgs (2022-10-20 12:00:23+00:00): Hi,

Kommentare bei Changesets werden oft nicht gut gefunden. Wenn du anderen Mappern etwas mitteilen möchtest solltest du einen anderen Weg nehmen.

Für Hinweise zu einem OSM-Objekt kannst du den "note"-Tag verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:note

Wenn etwas gefixt werden muss, kannst du den "fixme"-Tag verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme

Und alternativ gibt es noch die Möglichkeit einen Hinweis auf der Karte selbst zu hinterlassen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127683229
archpdx (2022-10-18 04:14:14+00:00): Quick tip: you can use the hotkey 'q' to square the corners of buildings
SHARCRASH (2022-10-18 15:12:26+00:00): Hi!,

The path was previously tagged by myself as railway=razed, for a former railway project which was abandoned during constructions. Next contributor changed it as path, Don't know why... I restored it only as railway=razed. 

Next time, can you life cycle such ways in nature with prefix with "abandoned:highway" on the key when they disappeared naturally or "razed:highway" when concealed in purpose, please? It's only a question of trail erosion, they can disappear or reappear in a matter of a year depending of activities or even reopened. It tells contributors if such way was already surveyed, like an archive when we check on the LIDAR. By the way, you could have done this for the recent bicycle tour you deleted. Pity, it was quite some work! If you want me to restore it and lifecycle it, just in case the ways will be reusable, let me know.

Thanks!
m sartor (2022-10-18 18:04:52+00:00): Hello, thanks for the very useful information. About the bicycle tour in Bettembourg: You don't need to restore it, it was not that much work to add and delete it. This tour was once intended to be signed but instead the commune put up signs for a new family tour (I already started that one as far as signs are installed). The Sonnepromenad tour is not signed and therefore not as ideal to leave it on the map
limes11 (2022-10-17 20:32:29+00:00): Hi und willkommen bei osm, 

vielen Dank für den Beitrag.

Wie ist denn dieser Fuß-/Radweg vor Ort ausgezeichnet?

Du hast ihn nun als Radweg mit Fußgängerfreigabe verzeichnet, das kann nicht stimmen. Ist dies ein gemeinsamer Rad/-Fußweg mit blauem Verkehrszeichen? Oder ein Fußweg mit "Fahrrad frei" ?

VG Limes
limes11 (2022-10-17 20:37:06+00:00): Ich nehme an, der Hinweis hier ist von dir. 

Stimmt es, dass der Weg nun asphaltiert ist? Dann könnte man dies ergänzen, surface=asphalt. Das erhöht die Attraktivität des Wegs im Rennradprofil von Komoot.
limes11 (2022-10-17 21:08:51+00:00): So, es gab hier Mapillary-Bilder, ich habe das Tagging hinsichtlich der Beschilderung und der Oberfläche den tatsächlichen Gegenbenheiten angepasst.

Der Weg ist allerdings nicht komplett bis zum Hafen asphaltiert. Ob Komoot nach dieser Änderung im Rennradprofil diesen Weg oder die Straße verwendet, ist deren Sache. Wir können hier nicht mehr tun.
Jodocus up Straat (2022-10-18 17:37:49+00:00): Korrektur: "...alle Masten von der KÜS Asbeck bis zum Mast 202" muss es richtig heißen
Sal’s Eats (2022-10-17 17:46:11+00:00): Sal’s Eats is a full service kitchen where we create American Cuisine. Sal’s Eats is a mobile restaurant. We offer menu items such as the Hot Brown Sandwich from Kentucky to Charcuterie boards loaded with fine meats and cheeses. Come experience everything we have to offer at an event or festival near you! Sal’s Eats uses locally sourced meats and produce to deliver the highest quality foods from farm to fork. We specialize in menus for wineries and breweries with menus for the whole family.

#Event Catering Company #Mobile Kitchen #Event Catering Company Lodi #Lodi Catering Company
Syl (2022-10-18 17:10:26+00:00): Bonjour, l'ajout de Geocaching dans OSM a l'air d'être plutôt déconseillé : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geocaching
Julbus (2022-10-18 17:15:12+00:00): je les enlève de suite 
merci
Syl (2022-10-18 17:44:22+00:00): Merci pour la correction rapide.
bxl-forever (2022-10-19 13:09:01+00:00): Hello,

I thought you might be interested to know the difference between two tags:
– "note" is aimed as fellow mappers; we use this to warn other mappers about something peculiar (e.g. I use it often for restaurants which have a deliberate spelling mistake in their name, to tell other people that they should not attempt to "fix" it)
– "description" is for the general public.  It is shown in mobile apps such as OsmAnd~  As the name suggests, we use it to describe what the object is about.

I changed "note" into "description" for the Olmec statue.

Have a nice day.
elucci (2022-10-20 10:25:13+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
As always, thanks for the constructive remarks! In this case I actually knew the difference, so it was a somewhat silly mistake due to inattention. However I see from your changeset that you can put language-specific descriptions, so I learnt something new anyway.
Have a nice mapping!
user_5359 (2022-10-30 17:51:31+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1104760099. What is the meaning of the tag Ute = CCO?
Frans S (2022-10-19 10:35:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Tagging of roads.
A trace of a road, with a width of max 1.5 mtr is mostly not to be tagged as residential. To narrow. Use Path instead.
You did not align the mappings to Max nor Bing.
When you are mapping on a HOTOSM project. Leave the Changeset comments in place.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127685884
Frans S (2022-10-19 10:38:02+00:00): Another point.
When you mark a changeset as bad mapped, please leave a comment to the mapper involved, so he knows he (I assume the mapper is a he) has to improve his skills.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127685884
RicoElectrico (2022-10-17 22:18:21+00:00): Cześć, trochę dziwne jest boisko, przez które przebiega strumień/rów. Wyjaśnisz?
Tituh (2022-10-18 05:43:46+00:00): Boisko jest małym prostokątem przy skrzyżowaniu - widać bramki aczkolwiek cały teren od skrzyżowania do zakładu DS  Smith jest zielony - trawa i mnóstwo drzew
PT-53 (2022-10-18 07:52:52+00:00): Hallo 0pf3rL4mm,
Du hast diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37786186/history
von path auf cycleway umgestellt.
Warum?

Du schreibst, daß dieser Weg eindeutig als "Mixed-use path/Radweg " ausgeschildert ist. Wenn dort also Fußgänger erlaubt sind (Verkehrszeichen # 240) dann ist / war path die richtige Straßenklassifizierung. Cycleway sollte in OSM nur für reine Radwege verwendet werden, auf denen Fußgänger verboten sind.
Siehe:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Was meinst Du mit "auch nicht geschottert sondern asphaltiert. " ?
Die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit war doch bisher gar nicht eingetragen.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
FahRadler (2022-10-21 15:05:27+00:00): Hallo Vinzenz,

wenn da jetzt abgesperrt ist - alles richtig.
Seltsam nur, dass jemand einen öffentlichen Weg blockiert...
Yunkers (2022-10-17 18:39:49+00:00): Instrukcja używania tagu building:levels
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:building:levels?uselang=pl

Poprzednia wersja była poprawna
user_5359 (2022-10-18 08:50:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bist Du Dir sicher (nicht nur, dass die Apotheke nicht im Haus mit der Hausnummer 31 liegt)? Im Internet findet man nur die Bärenapotheke, die aber bereits eingezeichnet ist.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-19 09:53:21+00:00): note that it should be subject:wikipedia on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10101384102/history for board topic
SHARCRASH (2022-10-17 20:49:53+00:00): I was wondering about it! Good that you clarified! :)
Tatfahren (2022-10-18 06:22:43+00:00): Hallo; Erstmal willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe mir deinen Changeset einmal angesehen und die Fehler nach meinem Wissen berichtigt (daher keine Garantie das nicht doch was falsches dabei ist, auch mir passieren Fehler).

Die beiden eingetragenen Spielplätze: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104775570/history und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104775569/history sollten kein "name=Spielplatz" enthalten, dieser Tag bezieht sich auf ausgeschilderte oder im Ort gebräuchliche Namen, wenn ein Spielplatz z.B. "Kletterparadies" oder ähnliches heißt. (hier mal die Seite zum "name=*" tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names) Ein Spielplatz sollte nach: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground getaggt werden. Natürlich kannst du dich auch an das Deutsche Wiki halten, aufgrund von Übersetzungsfehlern und Meinungsverschiedenheiten hat meines Wissens nach in Konflikten dann aber das Englische Vorrang. 

Zu den Notes: Notes sollten nur bei Erledigung oder absoluter  unverständlichkeit geschlossen werden. Die beiden Notes im Neubaugebiet hast du nur geschlossen, nicht bearbeitet. Ich würde einen nochmal öffnen, damit andere Mapper (oder du) das dann noch eintragen. Mit https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/ suche ich z.B. Regelmäßig nach "Neubau" in den Notes, um diese entsprechend zu bearbeiten.

Dann wünsche ich dir bei deinen weiteren Bearbeitungen viel Spaß, lese am besten vor der Verwendung von Tags die entsprechende Wiki-Seite zu diesen. Bei Fragen kannst du dich gerne an mich wenden, oder du gehst auf https://community.openstreetmap.org/ , dort wird auch gerne geholfen.

Danke, Tatfahren!
CAI Stabia (2022-10-19 08:04:43+00:00): Buongiorno Alessandro, 
hai spostato la cima del Molare in un altro punto in base a quali considerazioni?
Tieni presente che la cima è un punto trigonometrico dell'Istituto Geografico Militare, è quindi un punto che deve essere rilevato (e riportato su carta) con estrema precisione.
Quale strumento hai utilizzato per lo spostamento?
Ti chiediamo la cortesia di ripristinare la cima nel punto indicato.
alessandro trekking (2022-10-20 06:27:19+00:00): è fuori asse rispetto alle curve di livello, le isometriche, in realtà che guardate bene lo è ancora, sarebbe da spostare tutto il sentiero un po più a sinistra
CAI Stabia (2022-10-25 07:14:04+00:00): Purroppo le curve di livello utilizzate in OSM (SRTM) , soprattutto quando si tratta di picchi isolati non sempre descrivono bene il territorio. 
Per questo è necessario affidarsi sempre ai rilievi GPS per i sentieri, effettuati con apparecchi validi.
Nella mappatura dei sentieri dei Lattari, abbiamo utilizzato esclusivamente Garmin GPSMAP 64 e  66sr multicostellazione e multifrequenza.
adrianojbr (2022-10-18 00:09:03+00:00): Olá, Cnidaria!

Qual a fonte para o nome da Rua Franz Kandler?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127688242
Cnidaria (2022-10-20 20:53:44+00:00): Hello adrianojbr! A Maps user requested the street name. 
Olá adrianojbr! Um usuário do Maps solicitou o nome da rua.
adrianojbr (2022-10-20 23:04:15+00:00): 👍
elot360 (2023-04-15 09:35:23+00:00): Cześć, dla torów które są używane okazjonalnie (Są przejezdne ale nie są wykorzystywane w regularnym ruchu liniowym) stosuje się railway=tram i service=spur. Tag którego użyłeś (railway=disued) używa się tylko dla odcinków torów które zostały porzucone (Np po zawieszeniu ruchu) lub odseparowane tymczasowo od reszty sieci (Np w przypadku prowadzenia modernizacji torowisk w innym miejscu).

Poprawiłem tagi w tym miejscu
gurglypipe (2022-10-18 08:53:30+00:00): Hiya. I think some of the changes from track/driveway to footpath here aren’t quite tagged right. In particular, changing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315088626 from a driveway to a footpath loses information about the fact that vehicles can travel along it.

Are you aware of the designation= tag which can be used to tag the legal status of a footpath/bridleway, separately from how the appearance/construction/surface of it is tagged?

In this case I would have tagged the driveway as:
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
designation=public_footpath
foot=designated

The access=private sets the default access, and then foot=designated overrides that for foot traffic. designation=public_footpath indicates the legal status of the route. highway=service, service=driveway indicates the type of construction of the route.

Does that fit with what’s on the ground here? It seems to match the satellite imagery. :)
Belseybob (2022-10-18 15:53:40+00:00): Thank you. I have been trying to work out where public_footpath etc come from. Designation doesn't come up prominently in iD. I'll go back and try to sort it out. This changeset also highlights another problem, that level crossing options seem to include only barriers, not gates, whether powered, manually operated or pedestrian operated.
Thanks for your input; I'm still learning!
gurglypipe (2022-10-18 16:05:20+00:00): Yeah, because of the legal complexities of access rights in the UK, representing it all in OSM and ID can be a bit tricky at times!

There are a few wiki pages which cover specific tagging for the UK, which you might find helpful if you haven‘t found them already:
 - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom
 - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation

I’m happy to help out with any questions you might have that aren’t covered by those wiki pages — just drop me a message.

Thanks for all your edits around the area recently. You’ve been busy!
gurglypipe (2022-10-24 09:19:46+00:00): I’ve tweaked the access tagging and highway tagging for these paths in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127987133.

Please say if anything doesn’t look right! Thanks again :)
gscscnd (2022-10-18 06:09:09+00:00): Oj, widzę, że ta ścieżka już tu była, a inny użytkownik skasował ją pół roku temu: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117739763>. Czy połączenie z Jodłową też powinno być przywrócone?
Michał Śmigielski (2022-10-18 06:30:28+00:00): ta ścieżka powinna być na mapie, ponieważ faktycznie istnieje, jest w dobrym stanie technicznym i łączy szlaki. Inny użytkownik który ją skasował, napisał że ten szlak nie istnieje. To jest nieprawdziwe stwierdzenie.
Połączenie z Jodłowa powinno być przywrócone !
gscscnd (2022-10-18 15:52:11+00:00): Byłem na miejscu, ścieżka oczywiście istnieje. Uzupełniłem część braków: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127735120>.
Michał Śmigielski (2022-10-18 17:56:14+00:00): dziękuję
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-03 06:42:13+00:00): Do you know why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104784151/history has surface=construction?
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-10-19 00:31:41+00:00): Where the heck did you find a source of tracks, I marked them out based on descriptions s but I have never seen a map in all my years of living in Manhattan, and even then not exactly something i wanted in osm, but curious what source you find for it so i can share it with people.
Ashton747 (2022-10-21 13:54:48+00:00): Thee route verification is from a department of the interior report on the development of manhattan kansas titled "DEVELOPMENT OF MANHATTAN, KANSAS: 1855-1945 ". I also had two pictures as verification, a postcard found online and a picture hanging up in the chef (Confirming 4th street and poyntz).
SekeRob (2022-10-18 11:44:49+00:00): Hi,

Do you really need to do this 'in situ' Streetcomplete quest completing covering half of Europe each time. Your edits push all other local edits from the active history view. Not good. StreetComplete is for local survey updating, NOT updating from memory which is very surely failing many a time.

For your awareness, here's a wiki discussing 'best practiise' on sizes of change set areas covered in the single save, with special attention called on for the chapter "Geographical size of changesets".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Ciao and thanks for being a good OSM citizen.
tadams (2022-10-18 11:57:20+00:00): Sorry, but maybe you can imagine, that there are people, that regularly travel accross europe? So, it is not like you imply on me, that I do changes from memory, I just do changes on my ways. 
To my opinion being a "good OSM citizen" is also think before accusing.
  
I can think of uploading a bunch of changes, when I go to another region.

Ciao.
SekeRob (2022-10-18 12:39:43+00:00): When you travel you can still upload which is pretty much from anywhere. StreetComplete can be set to do that ;o)
tadams (2022-10-18 13:29:30+00:00): Again. Not only as OSM citizen, better when you read (or listen to) what people write (or say). I wrote: "I can think of uploading a bunch of changes, when I go to another region."

BTW:i will not continue this silly discussion.
eggie (2022-10-17 20:13:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2022-11-10 14:24:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A request. Please follow the instructions about hedges and when to map. You mapped quite a lot of hedges which are not accompanied by roads and not necessary for this project.  Please do not map hedges twice over the same trace.
Best regards and keep mapping.
MishellCatucuamba (2024-05-16 16:21:18+00:00): Thanks for your recommendation, I will take it into account.
QuezXLV (2022-10-17 21:29:21+00:00): For reference on these updated roads: https://www.winchesterva.gov/sites/default/files/documents/utilities/hope-drive-option2.pdf
Lex Martins (2022-10-20 11:34:04+00:00): Bom dia Dalva, primeiramente seja bem vinda ao OSM, reparei que você fez uma mudança aqui no Estádio Mário Pessoa, editando a tag: leisure = stadium para: building = yes. Nesse caso essa última acaba sendo uma chave genérica e como pela imagem de satélite o local é um campo de futebol sem cobertura a primeira chave acaba sendo mais adequada e você pode adicionar as arquibancadas com a tag: building =  grandstand, bom mapeamento.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 06:42:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10109912031/history has maxspeed = default that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of maxspeed=implicit ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=implicit and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=default

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used tag?
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-18 08:56:15+00:00): I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127713077 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war).
mcliquid (2022-10-28 18:38:23+00:00): Could you please pay attention to smaller changesets in the future. QA tools have very big problems with this. Thank you very much.
mcliquid (2022-10-28 18:39:23+00:00): And the relation here has only two instead of three members: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6854367
easbar (2022-10-28 18:42:33+00:00): Ok, sure. Do you mean small in terms of the number of changed elements or small in terms of total area covered by all changes in the changeset (obviously quite large here).

Yes, 6854367 is missing a to-member (already before my changeset).