piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marjolein Schipper-Rutten (2016-07-25 08:41:04+00:00): Dear Andy. Pioneers Camp has a camping site but also chalets that they sell like a hotel. So it is really two different products.
Sindabezi is the sister lodge of Tongabezi and it is indeed on a very small island in the Zambezi River. It has only 5 rooms and the little island is only the lodge. I hope this makes more sense now? I have been in both places, so if you have more questions, please let me know. Marjolein
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 08:42:15+00:00): Excellent - thanks.
It's always good to get updates from someone who's actually been there :)
eggie (2018-04-29 18:49:35+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
olehz (2018-02-27 14:32:59+00:00): дебіл, ти заєбав змінювати адмінкордони і зліплювати геометрію! ПРОСИЛИ Ж НЕОДНАРАЗОВО так неробити!!! за тобою навіть косяки виправити неможливо
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:30:02+00:00): you have added a name in a foreign language to a viewpoint in Italy, this is likely wrong. Please only add names to things that do have a name, and please use the local name for the "name" tag and use localized "name:*" tags for other languages
LidaCity (2016-06-13 09:24:01+00:00): было бы неплохо в какой-нибудь тэг website добавить ссылку на это граффити.
тут Дракон?
Andrea Musuruane (2016-06-12 18:51:09+00:00): Ciao Francesco e benvenuto su OSM. 
     Quella che hai mappato è una farmacia o una parafarmacia? Se è una parafarmacia bisogna aggiungere dispensing=no:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=pharmacy?uselang=it

Inoltre, il nome non sembra corretto. Innanzitutto dovrebbe iniziare con una lettera maiuscola e poi dovrebbe essere scritto in modo completo e senza abbreviazioni. Ad esempio, "Farmacia Dottor Pinco Pallo".

Ultimo, ma non meno importante. Sei sicuro del posizionamento? A vedere dalle foto satellitari, sembra una villetta...

Ciao,

Andrea
SJFriedl (2016-06-12 14:40:07+00:00): Actually all the house points + streets in the area; meant to include just this one street's changes, but got all modified instead
RicoElectrico (2016-06-13 10:44:48+00:00): Hi. Make sure your buildings have 90° angles so they are true rectangles. In iD editor the "S" key orthogonalizes areas or lines. Please fix it.
p1230 (2016-06-13 21:20:05+00:00): okay, thank you
Bergarath (2018-07-04 21:17:56+00:00): The real name of that street is "rue de Saint-Georges "
SomeoneElse (2017-01-13 14:51:58+00:00): Personally, I wouldn't add "place=isolated_dwelling" for things such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4239537498 .  If a house is visible on the Bing imagery I'd add that as a house, and if the name's visible on OS OpenData I might be tempted to add that as a house name, but house and farm name information on OSSV is so out of date that I'd definitely add a "source:addr:housename" or similar for it.
The nearby http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4239537556 might still be called that and might still be a farm, but many former farms house light industrial units or have become essentially residential.  Bing here suggests "farm or light industrial" rather than "residential".
Best Regards,
Andy
kreuzschnabel (2017-01-13 21:36:50+00:00): Why wouldn’t you, too close to Thirsk? While I use addr:housename for residential houses within larger dwellings (e.g. villages), my idea on remote places is that users should easily find them in the map, therefore I enter their names as a place on its own (provided it has a name, of course). Am I right in thinking isolated_dwelling is for places which are too small even to be called a hamlet?
SomeoneElse (2017-01-13 22:42:01+00:00): There's a fair amount of overuse of "isolated_dwelling" in the UK (possibly because the standard style renders it, and used to render it more prominently than it did now).  I've always thought of "isolated_dwelling" as being for places that really are places - not just houses on the outskirts of villages.  Half way between Sutton and Thirsk isn't very isolated (I know the road well).  There was some discussion on talk-gb about it relatively recently.
kreuzschnabel (2017-01-14 07:26:39+00:00): Possibly because there are so many scattered dwellings in the British countryside :-) As I said, in my idea on OSM usability, someone may tell me, "I live in Melrose, near Thirsk", I’ll reply, after a quick search, "yep, got it in my map, dont need further description". If this works on addr:housename as well with remote places, I’ll be happy to confine myself to more isolated places in using isolated_dwelling.
SK53 (2017-01-14 20:51:35+00:00): Strongly agree with @SomeoneElse. The place=isolated_dwelling tag is almost always a mistake in Britain. For large distinctive isolated buildings (country houses for instance) adding name to the building is fine, for smaller residences this information belongs in addr:housename. Where an isolated dwelling is an actual topographic name use place=locality. Many 'isolated dwellings' these days are 2-3: say original farm house, the farm bungalow (warmer than former) and old workers cottages may all look to be one site, but the old house is a second home, the bungalow is where the famer lives, and the cottages are holiday lets. They're often hard to disentangle even by survey, so at a minimum a source tag is needed.
GinaroZ (2017-01-14 21:46:18+00:00): place=locality is for an unpopulated place though
kreuzschnabel (2017-01-14 22:20:35+00:00): Right Ginaro – locality is for named hillsides, pastures etcetera. (Hillsides are often tagged natural=peak which is wrong unless there really is a visible peak.)
SK53 (2017-01-15 14:17:01+00:00): Don't be too wedded to wiki definitions. Often the locality name covers a broader area than just the buildings which have the same name. Sometimes the locality came first, sometimes the buildings. Unless one has detailed research/local knowledge it's not easy to decide & EPNS researchers spend years on such problems. Notwithstanding the wiki and mapping by abc* (often incorrect) use of place=isolated_dwelling is scarcely used in the UK. I would suggest further discussion for a wider audience on talk-gb.
Stephan van Helden (2023-01-14 17:08:00+00:00): Die beiden Bäume in Heustreu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4239556860 und der daneben) sind nirgendwo sonst als Naturdenkmal geführt. Hast du vielleicht noch Fotos, auf denen ein ND-Schild zu sehen ist?
surveyor54 (2023-01-15 10:37:57+00:00): Hi,
hab noch eins gefunden.
Scheint vielleicht eine lokales Naturdenkmal zu sein. 😔

https://ibb.co/mDkWRbC
Viele Grüße
Stephan van Helden (2023-01-15 10:53:28+00:00): Danke für das Bild! Naturdenkmäler sind per Definition "lokal", also auf Landkreisebene geregelt. Hab aber schon andere Bäume gefunden, die in den offiziellen Listen fehlen, und dann vom LRA die Bestätigung erhalten, dass es wirklich Naturdenkmäler sind. Gleichzeitig hat man mir aber gesagt, dass die Leute auch mal Naturdenkmal-Schilder an Bäumen anbringen, die gar keine sind. Muss ich wohl mal nachfragen.
Supaplex (2016-06-12 15:48:27+00:00): There's some Taipei restaurant like 林東芳牛肉麵 already in the OpenStreetMap database. And you use the wrong tag for 寧夏夜市, there's many restaurants and vendors in 寧夏夜市
Supaplex (2016-06-12 15:50:16+00:00): Here's the 林東芳牛肉麵 in Taipei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4200420295

If you just want to point the correct location of the restaurant, just move the previous one into the correct spot.
Supaplex (2016-06-12 15:37:05+00:00): According to the OSM wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes on the ground rules, and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name use common defualt name on the name label, I switch between the name<->alt_name
chihchun (2016-06-12 16:13:30+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
marczoutendijk (2016-06-12 18:32:36+00:00): Ik heb je edit aangepast omdat je een nieuw adres hebt aangemaakt dat niet lijkt te bestaan. Bovendien heb je midden op de straat iets neergezet in plaats van in het pand. Zie ook mijn welkomstmail.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-12 20:43:53+00:00): Overigens kan ik het GMSS guesthouse op geen enkele lijst vinden. Heb je meer details?
Website? Phone?
literan (2016-06-16 10:49:23+00:00): какая еще альпийская хижина  в жилом доме?
Endres Pelka (2016-06-13 16:51:38+00:00): Why deleting boundary lines? I'm fixing them now.
ntzm (2026-07-31 15:49:55+00:00): Hey, I couldn't find any information about cycling being permissive on this path. I know it's been a while, but do you know where this information came from?
Colin Smale (2016-06-23 19:49:36+00:00): Please check the name, I think it should be spelt Kwikfit
trigpoint (2016-06-12 16:56:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition, however does this guest house have a name/phone number/website?
Somebody looking at the map will need a means of making a booking.
trigpoint (2016-06-21 11:59:10+00:00): No response from mapper and aerial imagery makes this unbelievable as a location for a guest house, reverting
R0bst3r (2016-06-13 09:18:27+00:00): Da hat jemand das Detailmapping für sich entdeckt. :D

Kleiner Tipp: Wenn ein Objekt einen Schlüssel mehrfach bekommt, hängt der Editor iD ein _1 usw. an. Diese Schlüssel werden dann aber ignoriert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424576542

Ob das ein Fehler von iD oder ein "Feature" ist, darum streitet man sich in der OSM Gemeinschaft. Ich persönlich arbeite mit Semikolons: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator, da ich dies zumindest für auswertbar halte aus meiner eigenen Datennutzer sicht.

Aber auch hier gibts Gegenstimmen.
Aalen1 (2016-06-14 18:59:14+00:00): Werde mir das ganze noch malgenauer anschauen! Ich dachte mal für mich ist das malso ein Übungsbeispiel,weil der Spielplatz praktisch vor meiner Haustür liegt!
zarl (2016-09-01 06:16:49+00:00): Hallo schwenkomat,

du hast hier als ersten Beitrag zu OSM gleich mal einen Weg gelöscht. Woher nimmst du die Information, dass der Weg nicht vorhanden ist? 

Kennst du dich vor Ort aus?

Ich habe jetzt diverse Bildquellen ausprobiert (Orthofoto 2011 und 2014, Bing), und überall ist hier ein Weg zu sehen.

Gruss,

Zarl
Peter63 (2016-09-01 07:47:23+00:00): Hallo,
kann ich bestätigen, Weg gibt es nicht mehr
seit der neue Kreisverkehr gebaut wurde.
Gruss,
Peter
zarl (2016-09-01 08:38:18+00:00): Ok, Danke für die Erklärung. Insgesamt ist es dann oft ganz hilfreich, den way nicht komplett zu löschen, sondern mit einem Lebenszyklus-Präfix zu markieren (hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix ) und eine entsprechende note=* zu hinterlegen, denn der Weg ist (noch) in den Luftbildern zu sehen und wird dann gerne wieder von irgendwem eingezeichnet... hier also vermutlich disused:highway=* oder removed:highway=*

Gruss,
Zarl
johsin18 (2021-03-04 17:35:40+00:00): Hallo Jojo4u,
mit ist aufgefallen, dass bei Leonberg in Nominatim immer Grafenau in der Hierarchie steht, was keinen Sinm macht:
Stadt Leonberg, Grafenau (Württemberg), Landkreis Böblingen
Gleiches gilt auch für Renningen und Magstadt. Das scheint am dem hier eingefügten Knoten hier zu liegen, der keine echten Grenzen hat, und innerhalb eines gewissen Abstands überall mit rein spielt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240095459

Ich würde den lieber löschen, für Grafenau
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/722156
nehmen, und ggf. Tags ergänzen.
Was meinst du?
johsin18
Jojo4u (2021-03-22 21:08:52+00:00): Hi, von mir aus gern. Mir ist nur wichtig dass ein place=village/town/city Node immer auf im Zentrum einer Siedlung ist. Place=municipality auf dem Umriss statt auf auf einem Node ist recht elegant.
LG Jojo4u
Deanna Earley (2016-06-12 17:36:14+00:00): Accidentally included some parts from 39975927
Deanna Earley (2016-06-12 17:35:46+00:00): Some parts accidentally in 39975737
trigpoint (2016-08-22 18:39:59+00:00): Hi, is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3077317663 really a post office?
It seems a very odd name, and there is a post office over the road. Actually I visited Kings Cross Post Office on the way to SOTM-EU
yourealwaysbe (2016-08-22 23:58:13+00:00): It's a good question. Doddle is a service to which you can have packages delivered and then pick them up (eg on the way home from work). I'm not 100% happy it's a post office, but i'm not sure what else to tag it, and post_office had been used elsewhere to tag Doddles. If there's a more accurate tag it should be updated.
yourealwaysbe (2016-08-23 01:38:32+00:00): The description of post_office on the wiki seems appropriate, though it doesn't match the intuitive meaning in the uk.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office

There is one in Birmingham tagged parcel_collection_point, but googling for this doesn't turn up anything for me.
trigpoint (2016-08-23 16:31:32+00:00): The description in the wiki is a bit like describing a supermarket as a place that sells baked beans:)
THis does look like it is tagging for the renderer and really isn't the understood meaning of a post office which does banking, passports, car tax and loads of other things. Somebody searching for a post office would not be happy if the map led them here.
Parcel_collection_point does seem a reasonable tag and OSM is a do-ocracry, you do not need permission from the wiki.
yourealwaysbe (2016-08-23 17:39:47+00:00): I expect the wiki takes a more international view: Fedex and UPS seem to be generally tagged as post_office also.  I think Doddle sits happily with these two (packages can be sent and received and there is a customer service desk).  It is also the typical tagging of Doddle in the UK (admittedly n~=10).  I was ok with Doddle being a post office, rather than the Post Office, and with the "operator" tag (and name) to distinguish it.  (Or at least, wasn't unhappy enough to justify a new tag to myself.)

parcel_collection_point misses the ability to send.  If it were a vending machine, there's vending=parcel_pickup;parcel_mail_in.  I'd be fine with something along these lines if you want to change it.  Perhaps amentiy=parcel_pickup;parcel_mail_in to be consistent with the existing vending scheme?
SK53 (2016-08-24 11:26:00+00:00): I think basically in the UK tagging them as post_office is not accurate. The minimum I would expect from a post office is to be able to buy stamps & send letters, packets & parcels through International Postal Union members. 

I would suggest amenity=parcel_service
SK53 (2016-08-24 11:27:07+00:00): Or possibly amenity=post_depot (but parcel services do not handle post (yet!))
yourealwaysbe (2016-08-25 02:49:56+00:00): amenity=parcel_service sounds good to me :)
Luuuddooo (2016-08-17 19:05:08+00:00): Bonjour,

En regardant les photos aériennes (Bing ou IGN) la présence de ce parking, collé à une maison me parait étrange: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4239872445

Confirmez-vous qu'il existe vraiment à cet endroit ?

Merci,

Ludo.
mavl (2016-06-13 10:37:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Я немного уточнил название отеля, которое вы недавно изменяли [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/506112200/history].  
  
[http://doubletree3.hilton.com/en/hotels/russian-federation/doubletree-by-hilton-hotel-tyumen-TJMOSDI/index.html]
Vostok90 (2016-06-14 02:37:07+00:00): ОК. Только после окончания ремонта не забыть бы. Поравить :)
Владимир К (2016-06-14 05:41:30+00:00): А что продают в этом магазине?
Roger C Soares (2016-06-14 21:58:08+00:00): Oi jpgon,

Você chegou a inspecionar o parque Maurílio Biagi? Da última vez que passei por lá a cerca do parque ia até onde estava desenhado antes, inclusive se você reparar bem, dá para notar a cerca na imagem de satélite...
marczoutendijk (2016-06-13 12:41:06+00:00): Is het een camerawinkel of is het een fotograaf?
Of misschien beide?
Er ontbreekt nl. nog een shop=photo.
Zie hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
BCNorwich (2016-06-13 05:33:26+00:00): Hi, is the house number correct?
Astro*Consulting (2016-06-13 07:45:42+00:00): Many thanks, was indeed wrong. I have corrected the number, am working on this end of the road from the bridge out to the junction and will be qualifying numbers and names as I go along.
BCNorwich (2016-06-14 05:40:48+00:00): No trouble, if I can help/advise please just ask. One tip, buildings/houses usually have square corners, you can easily square up a whole building so it looks neater in iD by selecting then square corners. 
If you're going to be doing a lot of mapping then the JOSM editor is far superior to iD. 
Regards
Astro*Consulting (2016-06-14 21:43:32+00:00): Thanks BC, tried JOSM a while back but will pull it down again and work with it a while - Rgds and thanks for your help. Please stay in touch - Andy
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:18:47+00:00): I have deleted this feature because it is misspelled and you have created a duplicate with the correct name
user_5359 (2016-06-13 06:34:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check your changeset comment. "Test" isn't a good description for 66 objects.
highflyer74 (2016-06-14 09:57:05+00:00): Moin!

Kannst Du Dir einmal diesen Punkt ansehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3500625409.

Was ist dor=164? Fingertrouble...?

Gruss aus dem Norden!
Peilscheibe (2016-06-14 10:56:05+00:00): Ui, das hätte ein direction=* werden sollen, dicke Finger ;-)
Habs eben repariert. Danke fürs finden!

lg
P.
highflyer74 (2016-06-14 11:01:00+00:00): Aber gerne doch ;-)
Vitalts (2016-08-31 06:43:26+00:00): Miks te panite järgmistele joontele highway=pedestrian?

Bremeni käik (8065287)
Bremeni käik (239719324)
Bremeni käik (239719323)

Seal saab autoga sõita -> highway=residential + living_street = yes või highway=living_street
k__ (2016-09-01 20:07:20+00:00): See tänav on ju sellise ilmega, kitsas ja kõnnitee kattega, et kehtib kõige paremini " mainly / exclusively for pedestrians " (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian). Ei ole eriti mõeldav, et sedakaudu sõita autoga Vene tänavalt Uuele. Vene tn pool niikuinii keelumärk ees.
Vitalts (2016-09-03 13:06:49+00:00): Hea näide, et teed ei tohi klassifitseerida ainult väljanägemise järgi.
Keelumärk asub selles punktis:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294844379, mis tähendab, et see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8065287 "Bremeni käik" tänava osa võiks kasutada autodega mõlemale poolele, ja kasutatakse, sest et, seal on parkla veel.
Selles http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239719324 osas ka ei keelata mõlema poole sõita. Sellega, ühesuunaline tee ainult see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239719323 osa
Tagastasin, nagu oli
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41888580
k__ (2016-09-04 18:28:21+00:00): Jään endiselt arvamusele, et sellistel piiripealsetel juhtumitel tuleb rohkem kasutada "common sense"i, mitte mingeid jäikasi klassifitseerimisskeeme. Common sense ütleb vähemalt minule, et Bremeni käigule sobib kõige paremini "mainly for pedestrian use".
Carnildo (2016-06-13 18:21:39+00:00): Are you sure about the east-west runway here?  In the latest Mapbox imagery, it looks like it may have been abandoned and re-vegetated.
pete404 (2016-06-14 16:23:49+00:00): In mapbox it appears to have a strip of green vegetation, so I shrunk the runway and tagged it as disused.
pete404 (2016-06-14 16:23:59+00:00): Changeset 40021004
wille (2016-10-12 00:54:00+00:00): oi, Gerald

Tudo bem?

Percebi que tem várias ruas com o nome de Travessa da Torre e na camada do IBGE não constam os nomes destas ruas. Confirma esse nome?

Obrigado,
wille
cadsauxk (2016-10-12 01:29:32+00:00): Oi Wille

pelas minhas anotações de source está como IBGE. Mas fiz isto pelo Vespucci com o qual não tenho muita familiaridade, posso ter errado. 

abraço
cadsauxk (2016-10-12 01:31:14+00:00): Devo ter errado mesmo, vejo aqui que tem um nó com esse mesmo nome o que não faz sentido algum. Se você puder corrigir eu agradeço.
wille (2016-10-12 13:27:46+00:00): Corrigido! Valeu!!
kayle (2016-06-14 08:50:57+00:00): Zdravím, ak by som mohol odporučiť, tak by bolo dobré pridať ešte tag office=company k tomuto bodu, aby bolo jasné čo to name znamená.
Ďakujem.
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-28 06:25:36+00:00): Ich hab ein bisschen Bauchschmerzen bei den BST-Nodes. man_made=survey_point ist das richtige Haupttag. Das place=locality ist jedoch sachlich schräg (da kein Flurname) und erweckt ein bisschen den Eindruck, damit solle das Rendern des Namens auf osm-carto erzwungen werden.
gpserror (2021-08-22 17:24:33+00:00): Hi, I know this changeset is quite a while ago, and you may not remember what's out here, but was looking at the overlap of Willow St and Hemlock Ave going north-south.  Do you happen to know which is correct as both appear to be different than TIGER2020?
AlaskaDave (2021-08-22 18:42:49+00:00): It looks as though all I did was add surface=gravel. I somehow missed the name issue you mentioned as well as the duplicate ways. DOH!

I do not know the correct name because I haven't been there but I would use the Tiger 2020 info if I were looking at it now.

Thanks for the note. Feel free to follow your instincts on this.
AlaskaDave (2021-08-22 18:53:54+00:00): On second look, it appears I did incorrectly extend Hemlock Avenue.
I edited it to remove my error and added the Tiger 2020 name.
gpserror (2021-08-22 21:49:52+00:00): Cool, thanks for the fix!
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-18 01:23:57+00:00): I've removed the name of this private residence
ediyes (2016-06-13 20:39:47+00:00): Hi, 

What did you do here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72530824/history
Polyglot (2016-06-13 22:21:38+00:00): Definitely bit off more than I could chew. Something went wrong with an upload, so the data was only partially uploaded. I tried to fix it all now.
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-03 05:03:33+00:00): What is "Blue Diamond Enterprises"?
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-18 01:25:00+00:00): I've removed this name for now and then name of the private residence across the street.  If this refers to a company, please add additional tags to be used for verifiability.
naoliv (2016-06-13 12:02:33+00:00): Erick, qual o erro que o inspector falou que tinha aqui?
Se não me engano estava certo do jeito anterior: um prédio com uma torre de transmissão.
Da forma que está agora ficou apenas um prédio sendo ao mesmo tempo uma torre de transmissão (que não faz muito sentido).
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-06-13 21:05:55+00:00): Na verdade antes só tinha o ponto. Pensei que poderia juntar tudo. Pq na verdade só queria fazer o prédio com os levels. Então vou voltar a torre em ponto e deixar o building tbm ne?
naoliv (2016-06-15 02:05:53+00:00): Isso, deixa o prédio com o nó da torre.
compdude (2016-06-14 04:33:23+00:00): Suggest you change the new HOV ramps at the I-5/520 interchange to highway=proposed. They haven't been built yet and construction hasn't yet started. Also do the same with the bus ramps and the Montlake Lid.
Endres Pelka (2016-06-13 16:37:27+00:00): Please next time be more careful when fiddling with streets which are parts of boundary relations.
woodpeck (2016-07-27 21:47:03+00:00): Why were village names deleted in this changeset?
user_5359 (2016-06-13 07:46:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't think, that you working place is a tourism attraction.
Supaplex (2016-06-14 14:58:11+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
muralito (2016-06-13 23:54:51+00:00): Hola Facutucu.
Te hice unas correciones a las estaciones de servicio para describirlas con el etiquetado que corresponde, y no con el nombre.
Supaplex (2016-06-13 04:24:39+00:00): 有錯誤的狀況
我已經修正了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39983349