piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kar0line (2023-04-09 16:01:38+00:00): I have not tagged anything as bicycle prohibited
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-09 17:50:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061530587
kar0line (2023-04-09 18:53:28+00:00): ok thanks, just this one. I assume I have done it by mistake. I have deleted it now.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-09 18:59:23+00:00): 👍
MxxCon (2022-05-19 03:36:59+00:00): NYMM, Why are you STILL entering wrong opening hours?! After all this time you still haven't figured it out?!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121164992
Mannivu (2022-05-19 08:39:29+00:00): Per quale motivo? È inesistente?
BS97n (2023-09-14 20:01:57+00:00): Hallo,
du hast year-of-construction=1962 durch start_date=1962 ersetzt. Nach der Definition im deutschen besagt start_date „seit wann ein bestimmtes Objekt mit seinen weiteren als Tags formulierten Eigenschaften, seiner Lage und ggf. seiner Geometrie (wenn es keine Punkte sind) besteht.“ Das ist in diesem Fall falsch. Die Lokomotive wurde 1962 hergestellt, aber sie steht dort als Gendenkstück erst seit Mitte der 2010er Jahre. Das englische Wiki dagegen ist weniger eindeutig, aber in der Formulierung „started to exist as a feature“ sehe ich auch, dass damit der Zeitpunkt gemeint ist, an dem die Lokomotive zu dem feature 'Denkmal' wurde. Davor war sie ja ein bewegliches Objekt und damit kein map feature.

year-of-construction ist jedoch eindeutig falsch, wenn dann müsste es year_of_construction (mit Tiefstrichen) heißen. Das ist laut Wiki zwar deprecated, aber die Beschreibung „Baujahr“ trifft eher zu.

Ich würde mal das Jahr recherchieren, in dem die Lokomotive dort als Andenken hingestellt wurde. Dann kann man start_date=201X und year_of_construction=1962 angeben. Das sollte dann eindeutig sein. Was hältst du davon?
Ygramul (2023-09-15 06:08:10+00:00): Hm, bei artwork ist start_date tatsächlich, wann das Kunstwerk geschaffen wurde, nicht seit wann es dort steht (variiert ja auch zuweilen). 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dlocomotive erwähnt start_date auch für diese Art Objekt mit der gleichen Bedeutung.

Was im Umkehrschluß natürlich auch heißt, daß für Kunstwerke, ausrangierte Lokomotiven oder Waggons kein Tagging existiert, welches deutlich macht, seit wann das Ding da steht.
Ygramul (2023-09-15 06:12:23+00:00): Ich habe hier allerdings keine starke Meinung. Die Änderung damals kam eher zustande, weil ein neuer, bisher nicht benutzter Key verwendet wurde. start_date schien mir damals der korrekte Ersatz (auch immer noch nach Wiki-Konsultation zu historic=locomotive), aber ich kann auch mit year_of_construction leben. Wenn du beides setzt, ergänze eventuell eine note, die deutlich macht, warum zwei de-facto synonyme Keys mit unterschiedlichem Wert verwendet werden, sonst kommt eventuell ein anderer Mapper und macht da wieder was anders.
Langlaeufer (2022-05-19 13:35:59+00:00): Dear GlobeTooter
Please keep the geographical size of your change sets small. more information you find here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Wulfmorn (2022-06-27 09:43:10+00:00): Hi,

I found this node with unusual tagging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9753026587. Maybe it was meant to be something else.
hdevine825 (2022-05-19 14:51:04+00:00): One additional detail that you can add when mapping crossings is adding barrier=kerb nodes where the sidewalk becomes the crossing.

You can leave the type and tactile_paving tags blank since they aren't visible in aerial imagery. However, if those get filled in it enables routing for mobility and vision impaired users.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121165907
LarsKienzel (2022-05-19 23:51:35+00:00): The intersection of Old Cherokee and Pilgrim Ch Rd was reconfigured in summer of 2021, imagery is out of date. Please restore it as I had edited it. I'm local to the area.
wcedmisten (2022-05-20 01:01:02+00:00): Sorry about that. Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121218760#map=14/34.0104/-81.2423
kauevestena (2022-05-18 22:50:52+00:00): Wrong Hashtags, I accidentally clicked previous changeset comment.
mariotomo (2022-05-19 00:02:54+00:00): hola Alvarado2510. has mejorado lo de la descripción de tus intenciones, con el comentario apropiado al conjunto de cambios. sería muy bueno si pudieras mencionar las fuentes que realmente utilizas.  en Bing todavía no aparece este Alto Quiteño.  en Maxar sí aparece, pero con forma algo diferente.  el nombre sale de alguna otra fuente.  si quieres que los demás maperos de OSM puedan validar tus datos, realmente deberías mencionar tus fuentes.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 01:17:34+00:00): Buenas noches, gracias por tu comentario, la verdad luego de lo que me sucedio con Mirabella Park, decidi esperar unos años para añadir mas detalles a los residenciales, lo coloque por pase por el lugar en ocaciones, por ahora lo dejare asi.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 12:35:32+00:00): mi pregunta e inquietud sigue abierta: de dónde sale el nombre que pones?  cuando tu fuente es la observación directa, cuida de declararlo, con source=survey.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 12:46:59+00:00): lo que hiciste con Mirabella Park no me parece tener relación con el caso presente. en Maxar se aprecia bien la forma de la urbanización, las calles, los pasos peatonales. y el curso del arroyo al lado. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131606425

sigue abierta la pregunta sobre el nombre de la urbanización.
jeslop (2022-05-19 08:14:52+00:00): Hola Emilio Eugenio. Como siempre, gracias por tus contribuciones.

Sueles ponerle como nombre a las áreas de autocaravanas, "Área de Autocaravanas": esto es redundante. La propia etiqueta "caravan_site" ya lleva implícito que es un área de autocaravanas y no aporta ninguna información relevante: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España#Name_redundante

Si no tienes nada en contra lo corregiré.

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Emilio Eugenio (2022-05-19 12:34:26+00:00): Buenas tardes Jesús:

Muchas gracias por el comunicado.

Los que vamos en autocaravana diferenciamos entre Área y Parking y es la siguiente:

Área es zona de aparcamiento con servicios (agua, vaciado y a veces luz). Áreas las puede haber gratuitas o de pago.

Aparcamiento autocaravanas, solo es aparcamiento sin servicios. 

Como solo hay un indicativo, por eso aclaro la denominación para mejor información.

Espero haber aclarado las dudas y agradecer tu trabajo.

Saludos cordiales.

Emilio
jeslop (2022-05-19 14:12:21+00:00): Emilio, mira en la wiki el significado de la etiqueta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site

Ahí  va incluido todo eso que me cuentas. Aparte puedes mapear todas las características que os sean útiles. No hace falta añadir el nombre redundante de área, porque la etiqueta ya dice que es un área, no un parking.

Me he permitido rehacer la zona (que además según el ayuntamiento de Pamplona resulta que si tiene nombre), mira a ver que te parece como queda.

Gracias por tus apreciaciones.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Emilio Eugenio (2022-05-19 17:16:23+00:00): Hola Jesús:

Me parece perfecto la descripción de Área de Autocaravanas, eso identifica que hay servicios de llenado de agua y vaciado de aguas grises y negras.

Como te decía antes, la definición de "Camper" es muy genérica y la visión en el mapa no aporta nada.

Debo indicarte, que yo empleo la aplicación MAPS.ME en mi tablet para organizar los viajes en autocaravana y añadir lugares que no existen en el mapa para señalizarlos, así como mejorarlos cuando faltan informaciones como dirección, teléfono, web, horarios, etc.

Tengo los mapas acribillados de marcadores clasificados por colores para identificarlos cuando visito la ciudad. 

Por ejemplo, un Área de Autocaravanas la marco con marcador verde oscuro y un Parking para Autocaravanas con marcador verde claro.

Espero no haberte cargado la cabeza, por lo que te pido disculpas además de darte las gracias por tu trabajo.

Saludos 

Emilio
jeslop (2022-05-19 17:40:47+00:00): No hay nada por lo que disculparse. 

Gracias de nuevo por tus aportaciones y por el trabajo y el tiempo que te tomas.

Saludos.

Jesús
AgusQui (2022-06-18 00:09:59+00:00): No se debe agregar public_transport a estaciones que no tienen servicios de pasajeros, por favor ver: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AgusQui/diary/396933
user_5359 (2022-05-21 09:40:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag Hair creatine = کراتین مو
?
gendy54 (2024-11-04 17:05:16+00:00): Il n'y a pas besoin d'avoir de relation avec toutes les poubelles de Saint Martin si les limites de communes et de quartier sont bien tracées. Voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relations/Les_relations_ne_sont_pas_des_cat%C3%A9gories
Glassman (2022-05-19 21:47:12+00:00): #TIP: Imagery is often offset from prior background imagery. You can adjust the offset using the background icon on the right side of the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121169512
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:40:56+00:00): Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why?  Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why.  Thanks.
user_5359 (2022-05-21 09:31:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1061559304, http://www.osm.org/way/375283031.
What is the meaning of the tag Petite = Horny?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-21 12:44:41+00:00): Sorry It was some linda of copy and and paste erro maybe. I'll remove
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-21 13:39:16+00:00): done
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-05-19 22:34:40+00:00): A posição dos objetos é um pouco aproximado.
ika-chan! (2022-05-19 02:14:11+00:00): I forgot to say that provincial roads are generally highway=secondary, so therefore I am applying this rule to nearly all cases.
Zandu (2022-08-02 18:12:49+00:00): Good day, some of the tags you added to Sherman Avenue here dont look correct.  Covered? It is a two lane highway.  Also you added turn lanes for a long section.  I think maybe you meant to split the way it it was not split.
wcedmisten (2022-08-02 18:54:01+00:00): I may have gone overboard with merging the features after fixing the names to be consistent. Feel free to revert if incorrect.
Zandu (2022-08-02 18:56:26+00:00): Thanks, I'll give it a go.
adiatmad (2024-02-19 09:37:57+00:00): Hello, What is this barrier supposed to be? I noticed you were the first editor. Thanks!
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061562363)
Weblearning (2025-08-28 15:31:32+00:00): Kalk bay books have moved up to 62 Main Road
b-jazz (2025-08-28 15:42:27+00:00): Thanks Learning,

As you have more information on the physical move than I do, please feel free to move the object in OpenStreetMap as you see fit.
Weblearning (2025-08-28 15:57:18+00:00): Hello B-Jazz. Thanks. Wondering which is better. To have a marker or an area where the bookshop is. You will see that when you now serch for Kalk bay bookshop you get two results. Not sure what's better
b-jazz (2025-08-28 16:57:17+00:00): My preference depends on whether or not that business is the only one occupying that physical space as marked on OSM. If it is, then I'll put all of the necessary tags on the building. Otherwise, I'll create an address tag and put relative tags on that address.
Weblearning (2025-08-29 04:23:02+00:00): The whole building is shared by three businesses (with flats above) but the area I have marked out is the bookstore. Flats above (I'm assuming) are residential.
Frans S (2022-05-21 10:19:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I Noticed that you upload every single mapping. Please upload your mappings when you are finished or want to stop mapping.
My comments are valid for more changesets.
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121170769
Mashin (2022-05-19 13:21:44+00:00): Hi Kevin, I saw that you removed admin tags from some of the boundary ways. Are we now keeping them only on relations? If yes, I would then go and remove them in CT as well.
ke9tv (2022-05-19 13:33:38+00:00): Current practice is that it's OK to remove them, but it isn't necessary. I've been removing them whenever I have any other reason to edit a municipal boundary, but not seeking them out.

Lately I've been doing a comprehensive review of NY municipal boundaries, so I've been removing a lot of boundary tags on ways, but removing them wasn't the point - getting them correctly aligned was. As part of the process I've been correcting wrong admin_levels, making sure that everything has Wikipedia/Wikidata links, updating populations to the 2020 census, and so on, so there's a lot of retagging going on.
Mashin (2022-05-19 13:53:47+00:00): Perfect! I've seen you progress report. You're doing an awesome job!
Ygramul (2022-05-19 08:24:34+00:00): Good morning and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Nice that you've included your business in OpenStreetMap. However, in the future, please take some time and familiarize yourself with the conventions and tagging schema (using presets in the editor helps a lot).
I've corrected this here because the way you entered the information made it impossible to process and find for any tool using the OpenStreetMap database, so the business could not be found, nor did it have an address and other machine-readable information; thus it was effectively not there.
DUGA (2022-12-18 16:09:34+00:00): There is no such thing as PA-XXXX in PennDOT system.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175748352/history#map=19/41.82418/-75.68034
Supaplex (2022-05-19 05:12:38+00:00): 已經回退了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121173731
注意不要與既有的路徑重疊，會重覆繪製了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121171787
user_5359 (2022-05-21 05:22:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9753416388. What is the meaning of the tag "cerca divisa vértice (correção) com base em 06112011079.jpg" = "Chácara Estação Experimental de Quarentena de Anhembi - IAA Planalsucar"?
(one of them equal keys)
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2022-12-15 04:18:31+00:00): Hai Apay00
terima kasih atas kontribusi pemetaan Anda.

Saya menemukan jalan service (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061586698) yang melintasi water=reservoir (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061586699 ) tanpa jembatan sehingga menyebabkan warning.

Apakah Anda tahu apakah jalan service tersebut melintasi reservoir atau tidak? Apakah ada jembatan untuk menyeberangi reservoir tersebut? Apabila ada jembatan, bisakah Anda menambahkan tag bridge=yes dan layer=1 pada segmen jalan tersebut dan apabila tidak ada jembatan, tolong split jalan tersebut menjadi dua segmen agar tidak menimbulkan warning crossing highway/waterway.
Tolong beri tahu saya jika ada saran lain. Terima kasih.
______

Hi Apay00
thank you for your mapping contribution.

I found a service road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061586698) that crossing water=reservoir (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061586699) without a bridge causing a warning.. 

Do you know whether the service road crosses the reservoir or not? is there a bridge to cross the reservoir? If there is a bridge, could  you please add bridge=yes and layer=1 tags in the road segment and if there is no bridge, please split the road into two segments so as not to cause a warning crossing the reservoir. 
Please let me know if there's any other suggestions. Thank you.
somix (2022-05-19 12:29:59+00:00): Не надо все рисовать secondary! Выставляйте правильный тип дороги!
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 07:31:52+00:00): Если нет ума, то вообще ничего не трогайте. Зачем лепить какие-то дороги, где их никогда в помине не было с присвоением статуса как до областного центра. Всю вашу бредятину удалил и буду удалять. А закончите вы полным баном.
gkhmishkino (2022-05-24 08:16:41+00:00): Если у Вас так много ума, там могли бы и помочь. Я этой программой пользоваться не обучен. "Росдормониторинг" дал ссылку на это приложения, для нанесения дорог на подложку, которых у них нет. Помогите, чем можете, а оскорблять незнакомых людей, вообще не достойно.
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:02:56+00:00): А вас никто не оскорбляет, а констатирует факты вашей деятельности. То, что вы делаете называется вандализм. Данные подлежат удалению, а пользователь полной блокировке. OSM никаким местом не принадлежит Росдормониторинг-у и является международным проектом где собрались энтузиасты своего дела, которые осуществляют маппинг по общепринятым правилам и стандартам и не для кого исключений нет!
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:06:04+00:00): С подачи Росдормониторинг-а вы вносите массу фейковых данных, разрушаете дорожный граф, чем делаете невозможность использования данных в автонавигации. Да еще и на халяву просите оказать некую помощь в чужих хотелках. А не много хотите?
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:07:50+00:00): Порекомендуйте Росдормониторинг-у поднять свой локальный ресурс и вытворять там все, что захочет их левая нога, а может правая. Не знаю.
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:09:37+00:00): К вам домой ведь не ломятся осмеры с раскладушками и ставят вас в известность, что отныне они будут жить тута!
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:10:57+00:00): Вот тут извиняюсь, опечатался "не ставят вас в известность"
Stalker61 (2022-05-24 16:36:08+00:00): Если уж совсем примитивно излагать суть, то прочитайте на wiki, что допустимо вносить в тег name.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-22 15:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it is an undiscussed import.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-19 05:00:42+00:00): There is already a `motor_vehicle=permit` here though?
SomeoneElse (2022-05-19 10:07:01+00:00): Hello,
This changeset managed to drag node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/822854160/history from France to China.  I've moved it back and deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061592996/history which used it.
Please remap that building, but with a new node for the south-west corner, not one from France :)
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-05-19 10:07:13+00:00): 你好，
这个变更集成功地将节点 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/822854160/history 从法国拖到了中国。 我已将其移回并删除了使用它的 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061592996/history。
请重新映射该建筑物，但西南角有一个新节点，而不是来自法国的节点：)
最好的祝福，
安迪
user_11435438 (2022-05-19 11:59:29+00:00): Sorry, My mistake.😭
tastrax (2022-05-24 06:56:59+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
user_5359 (2022-05-21 06:26:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14158002 (one of eleven relations). What is the meaning and license of the foreign keys?
OBJECTID=1111
SHAPE_Area=0.000453456475455
SHAPE_LENG=	14118.632623800000147
SHAPE_Le_1=0.139810997191066
XZQDM=411322310201
XZQMC=四里店镇
乡镇代码=411322111
乡镇名称=四里店镇
县区代码=411322
县区名称=方城县
市区名称=南阳市
mueschel (2022-05-25 18:42:17+00:00): This looks like an import of boundaries from some unknown source. Please check the OSM import guidelines to see how imports of foreign data to OSM should be done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

All these 19000 objects don't seem to have any valid OSM tag, so I opt to revert them for now and to start a proper import.
user_5359 (2022-05-29 15:15:25+00:00): I revert this changeset.
marc__marc (2023-07-22 16:08:17+00:00): user_5359 : it seem you didn't a revert but a cleanup, for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9753501176 isn't reverted (and is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9006249451
16053 duplicates nodes in this area + not following import guideline + not telling the real source...
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-19 16:03:19+00:00): Пожалуйста, прекратите добавлять повторяющиеся дороги
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121174550
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:29:12+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-22 15:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted as it appears to be an undiscussed import
Ka6a (2022-05-23 16:40:24+00:00): Не одностороннее
Ka6a (2022-05-23 16:42:26+00:00): Кирпич у 139 дома, но въезд и выезд с революционного допустимы там знак движение запрещено.
onymous (2022-05-24 08:27:02+00:00): Виноват. Использовал неправильный инструмент для решения проблемы.
Спасибо что поправили.
alex_lofi (2022-05-21 09:50:15+00:00): Hola, no conozco la zona, pero ¿es posible que el parque se llame Fatinafar en lugar de Farinafar?
Saludos :)
bxl-forever (2022-05-19 08:42:48+00:00): Hello,
You removed the amenity tag.
It is no longer showing as a concert hall but rather as an ordinary building now.
JhowieNitnek (2022-05-19 08:45:20+00:00): Thanks for notifying me about that. I removed it by accident I will add it back
Mannivu (2022-05-19 09:21:09+00:00): Ciao e grazie. Per convenzione, però, in Italia gli indirizzi non vanno indicati sull'edificio, ma su un nodo posto circa in corrispondenza della targhetta che indica l'indirizzo.
rskedgell (2025-07-22 12:52:08+00:00): Please don't do this. TomTom are perfectly capable of smoothing sharp edges any way they wish when they render map data.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Ra_colate (2025-07-25 13:16:48+00:00): Hi rskedgell, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Ra_colate (2025-07-25 13:50:24+00:00): Hi rskedgell, thanks for reaching out and highlighting this edit. I misinterpreted this situation from aerial imagery. Thanks for the correction and I'll take care to avoid this in the future.
eggie (2022-05-19 07:32:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Tip.. Je zult dan de winkelinfo 'moeten' verwijderen van de adresnode.  Die laat je dan wel verder intact. Het agentschap kun je helemaal verwijderen, want dat heeft geen adres.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-19 07:33:54+00:00): Ahh een welkomstbericht had je al een keer ontvangen zie ik nu..  Wellicht heb je toch wat aan de 'links'

Gr eggie