piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
szydzio (2019-08-23 10:21:44+00:00): Adresy dodajemy za pomocą znaczników addr:* jako węzeł lub na obrysie konkretnego budynku. Wskazówki co do adresacji w Polsce: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
abakus_uploader (2019-07-05 22:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-07-05 18:06:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marc__marc (2021-02-22 17:21:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6591917286
Un généraleur de type turbine à vapeur connecté à un pipeline vapeur ne devrait-il pas avoir en entrée steam au lieu de heat ? oui c'est délicat en fonction de la pression :)
InfosReseaux (2021-02-23 18:50:09+00:00): Tu as raison, mais ces clé generator: sont à reprendre.
Elles ont été définies dans un contexte où il n'y avait pas grand chose, et désormais on aurait des outils différents pour décrire des systèmes aussi complexes.
Les pompes ont bien aidé à progresser, il y a encore quelques étapes à accomplir pour arriver à quelque chose de cohérent sur cette expériementation
stephankn (2021-04-02 12:42:45+00:00): had you been there on survey? Road surface looks more like concrete. Please confirm unpaved surface added in this area
stephankn (2021-04-03 07:14:34+00:00): I meanwhile found the related mapillary imagery. Looks like compacted gravel, macadam surface
Leo Slager (2019-07-05 23:30:30+00:00): Je hebt nu een bankgebouw op de kaart gezet met als naam Korfbalveld.
Probeer je even in te lezen en zoek in de wiki op dat dat een bench is.
(OSM is op het Engels(UK) gebaseerd)
ik verbeter het even
Leo Slager (2019-07-05 23:34:18+00:00): Na een jaar weer een bijdrage.
Ik zal je alsnog ons welkomstbericht toesturen.
voschix (2019-12-06 17:29:32+00:00): Obstacle=pole e width=0.86 non vanno d'accordo. Suppongo quello che vuoi dire è che in questo pezzo la larghezza del marciapiede è ridotto a 86 cm. Penso che devi creare un piccolo pezzo di highway=footway con width=0.86
isoipsa (2019-12-06 17:59:33+00:00): Grazie voschix. Come supponi width relativo a un ostacolo era stato inserito per mappare l'accessibilità, in quanto indica che un determinato elemento restringe la larghezza del marciapiede. Sarebbe utile discuterne nella pagina wiki relativa (v. alla voce ostacoli) e, nel caso, aggiornare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
isoipsa (2019-12-06 18:00:56+00:00): Scusa, il link giusto è questo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PEBA_Comune_di_Padova
isoipsa (2019-12-06 18:33:41+00:00): Ragionandoci, il fatto è che il marciapiede potrebbe avere, ad esempio, una larghezza=1 metro. L'elemento problematico che dunque restringe il marciapiede è l'ostacolo, non il marciapiede in sé.
alesarrett (2019-12-08 05:36:58+00:00): Grazie voschix, in effetti i tag obstacle=* e width=* non riuscivano a rappresentare bene la situazione. Nel caso di ostacoli come i pali sul marciapiede che restringono il passaggio, ritengo però che la rappresentazione migliore sia quella del nodo nella way, non al di fuori come l'hai modificato tu attualmente. Concordo che width=* possa confondere. 
Penso che la combinazione obstacle:<mezzoditrasporto>=* + maxwidth:physical=* rappresenti bene la situazione. Cosa ne dici?
Ho provveduto a modificare il corrispondente tag in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PEBA_Comune_di_Padova#OSTACOLI. Questa modalità era già stata usata durante la mappatura del PEBA, ma erroneamente non documentata nel wiki.
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 00:49:06+00:00): Hi, glad to see the edit. Do you happen to know if the address for the business that closed is still valid? Perhaps we can just delete the old business tags, and not lose that!  Thanks again!
ar-map (2019-07-12 01:48:05+00:00): Yes, I think so. I deleted the tags related to the restaurant only, so the building is showing the address number (3228).
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 02:31:12+00:00): Oh, I see. Had just seen the node address get deleted. Well, great job then. Cheers!
FasterTracker (2021-01-10 21:25:58+00:00): Boa noite!

Notei que nesta changeset a linha costeira junto ao "Medo Amarelo" passou a ser uma linha reta. 
Olhando para as imagens aéreas, isto parece não bater certo :p

Obrigado pela atenção e bom mapeamento!
Reino Baptista (2021-01-11 15:56:28+00:00): Obrigado pela chamada de atenção.
Já resolvi.
RB
Rassilon (2019-07-13 14:53:38+00:00): OSMCha flagged this for a "dragged node" - I assume for the node that stuck out on the NW. First: That is the actual boundary on the parcel map. Second: It was like that before I edited the southern area, I didn't touch that node. - Third: I unfixed the fixing of my fix in changeset 72211678
damjang (2019-07-05 19:49:11+00:00): Please see here for correct bilingual name:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.602643599295064&lng=13.80063177854985&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=pj73vNQIeJCO3qA7cSU1nQ&x=0.24833634778682373&y=0.4126740951422127&zoom=1.170731707317073
I will restore correct name.
Lex legis (2019-07-05 20:20:19+00:00): In base of what? Locally is not written anywhere the slovenian name.
Lex legis (2019-07-05 20:23:18+00:00): Got it, restore my error.
EneaSuper (2019-07-06 07:53:47+00:00): Ciao, stavo revisionando il tuo lavoro, ed ho notato che il parcheggio include anche un'area che, dato ciò che riesco a vedere da diverse immagini satellitari, è rialzata nonché completamente spoglia e abbandonata.

Sicuro di aver modificato tutto correttamente?

https://prnt.sc/obbeev
Paolo_C (2019-07-06 16:40:26+00:00): Ciao, la tua osservazione sarebbe corretta in base alla foto, ma non sono aggiornate. In effetti prima quella era un'area abbandonata (un vecchio percorso di binari in disuso) e separata da un muro dal resto del parcheggio; da alcuni mesi il muro è stato abbattuto e l'area ampliata, come ho descritto.
Ah... sono dipendente Ansaldo Energia, e tutti i giorni parcheggio la mia macchina proprio lì ;-)
EneaSuper (2019-07-06 16:43:35+00:00): Lo immaginavo, ma ho preferito chiedere 😁

Comunque ok, ma credo ci sia bisogno di perfezionare sia il parcheggio che il muro, dato che il primo "evade" nell'area a lato.
Paolo_C (2019-07-06 16:49:10+00:00): Figurati, hai fatto benissimo a chiedere e a farmi notare l'imprecisione. Sono le critiche costruttive come la tua che permettono di rendere affidabile e preciso OSM.
EneaSuper (2019-07-07 08:01:41+00:00): Ti ringrazio molto, buon proseguimento 😁
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:05:12+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «خشکرود» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:05:14+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «خشکرود» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:05:19+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «خشکرود» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:05:22+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «خشکرود» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
IgorMagellan (2019-10-19 18:43:36+00:00): Здравствуйте
Что-то как-то с этим мультиполигоном стало некафифо, как говорила моя дочь, посмотрите, хоть на мапнике каком-нибудь
Shoorick (2019-10-20 17:20:21+00:00): Добрый вечер!

1. Неправильное отображение в конкретном механизме рендеринга, даже популярном — не показатель. «Не рисовать под рендер» — одно из правил OSM, хоть и не входящих в число главных.

2. На первый взгляд нормально
![](https://habrastorage.org/webt/fd/pu/tv/fdputvsefgyowcbrgdeuqs77acg.png)

3. Если вам известны точные границы «Солнечной долины» — внесите.
viloan (2019-07-05 19:34:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DaveF (2019-07-06 11:10:29+00:00): You've removed foot=designated even though it's a PROW
You've added bicycle=dismount even though there are no signs
You've added horse=no even though it's a towpath!
You've removed all cycling tags even though it's an NCN route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544323127

For the above reasons I will be reverting your edit

Not only are your edits erroneous, they're lackadaisically consistent (only changing the occasional way) & proves you're mapper who contributes no improvements to the OSM database. Please refrain from editing in such a manner, especially in this area.
DaveF (2019-07-06 13:03:19+00:00): *inconsistent
AlwynWellington (2019-07-11 06:32:41+00:00): If you say so.

But you didn't ask a question about why.

They evidence the tag "highway=cycle and foot way".

My understanding is that tag has been removed and the advice is to replace with "=path"

You have now reverted to a redacted tag.

By your own actions you declare yourself to be lacksadaiscal and proves you are a mapper possibly caught in a time warp of long ago.

I suggest you consider refraining from taking a high position and add value to the entire process.

With kind regards
ma-rt-in (2019-07-07 11:06:48+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir Sicher mit deiner Änderung. Schon vorher war vehicle=agricultural gesetzt. Sag mal doch welche Beschilderung vor Ort steht?
vg
Quallus (2019-07-07 11:23:12+00:00): Hi,
jetzt wo Du nachfragst bin ich verunsichert... Ich werde mir das in den nächsten 1-2 Tagen besser nochmal ansehen. Ich war der Meinung, dass sich hier eine Änderung nach dem Bau der B53 Umfahrung ergeben hatte.
LG :)
ma-rt-in (2019-07-07 15:53:45+00:00): Hallo,
also auf diesem Bild: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Z3_aOXq7HPm7VlMOIBtDzA
lässt sich schon mal erahnen das Z250 mit Z1022-10 vorhanden sind. Somit ist deine Änderung schon mal falsch.
Für Verkehrszeichen richtig einzutragen kannst du mal hier schauen:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017

http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

vg
ralley (2019-07-07 08:06:14+00:00): Something has gone wrong with way 317607799 (Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses) - it looks nothing like the aerial imagery and has errors identified by OSMI.
ralley (2019-08-28 17:38:44+00:00): Updated buildinbg outline
ma-rt-in (2019-07-07 11:07:42+00:00): Hallo,
Baustellen werden mit landuse=construction beschrieben. Bitte anpassen.

vg
Quallus (2019-07-07 11:36:53+00:00): Hi, 
ist geändert, danke :)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-07-06 11:21:24+00:00): Porque excluiu estas trilhas?
ndm (2019-07-05 21:27:54+00:00): Think this will need to be reverted: there's a clear cycle path -- not a footpath https://binged.it/2LDjuKd
AlwynWellington (2019-07-05 22:50:15+00:00): @ndm, thank you
I looked at available imagery.
I found an urban sidewalk with signage (blue roundel showing a bicycle and child holding the hand of an older person.
The location of the sidewalk indicates use is a foot way as well as a cycle way.
Neither use is dominant.
A route of any type is not recorded.

From the wiki, the tags are sidewalk, footpath or path with both foot and bicycle showing yes.

The wiki suggests sidewalk is most relevant in this situation.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

regards
AlwynWellington (2019-07-05 22:56:50+00:00): I should add, reversion of a complete change set for one apparent transgression (which can be fixed by itself, if the wiki description is wrong) seems like a blunderbus strategy.

Please look again at the image.  You can see a sidewalk to the left and a road to the right.  They are mapped separately.

regards
ndm (2019-07-06 08:27:45+00:00): If you want a discussion start a topic on talk-gb as suggested previously.

If you want less of a blunderbuss approach then make the individual change(s) yourself.
DaveF (2019-07-06 10:42:28+00:00): >Neither use is dominant. 

The tagging, as was, implied no dominance for either user.

It's location is irrelevant. it's still classed as a shared use cycleway.

if the vast majority of a changeset is incorrect (as in this case - The K&A towpath relation shouldn't be extended) then a changeset revert is required.
AlwynWellington (2019-07-11 06:17:04+00:00): @DaveF, a tag of cycleway does imply cycling is the dominant use.
What is there is a path. 
That a Euro, NCR or local cycle route is signposted only goes to confirm it is a shared path.  And imagery indicates as many (if not more) on foot as on other means of getting about.
So "=Path" is the proper tagging with appropriate access tagged as "=yes".

First map what is "on the ground", then tag the access.  To tag a shared path as "=cycleway" indicates a conscious (or, possibly, an unconscious) bias.

kind regards
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 14:03:29+00:00): > a tag of cycleway does imply cycling is the dominant use. 
Strictly speaking, no - it's "designed to be usable by cyclists".  The wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway has had various versions of that over the years, but that's essentially the distinction.
trigpoint (2019-07-06 14:27:45+00:00): What source are you using to map the Kennet and Avon Canal Trail in OSM?
AlwynWellington (2019-07-07 22:10:42+00:00): @trigpoint, greetings
You have asked many questions recently.  Too many at one sitting to answer.
I have asked you one.
I think it not unreasonable for you to answer that one.

kind regards
DaveF (2019-07-08 11:20:08+00:00): What evidence have you that this route extends into Bristol?
trigpoint (2019-07-10 14:24:22+00:00): Alwyn
I am soory but was not aware of you asking me a question, but if you can point me at it?

Phil
AlwynWellington (2019-07-11 06:37:31+00:00): @trigpointg, thank you.

My question was "what interest do you have in the various matters you have raised?"

By way of example, are you only interested in all things near your home? 
 Or do you have training in mapping from, say, NCR?  Or something completely different?

My purpose is to see what we have in common and to work forward from there.

kind regards
AlwynWellington (2019-07-11 06:45:56+00:00): @DaveF, you have made many statements.  Some of which are about a standard of mapping that you obviously hod dear.  I can only wish my training was a detailed as yours.

You ask for evidence that the Kenett and Avon trail extends into Bristol.

There are several direct and a number indirect.

But so I can reply in context I first ask these questions of you.
Do you have any evidence:
1) ocean going boats went up the Avon from Bristol?
2) canal boats never (or hardly ever) went from Bath to Bristol and return?
3) goods were lightered from Bristol to a quay side at Bath to be transferred there to canal boats?
4) any other possibility?

If you do have such evidence, please provide so I can reply with mine couched appropriately.

kind regards
DaveF (2019-07-11 12:08:13+00:00): Oh, please; stop diverting. 
It's a walking route. Do you have evidence of signage?
parukhin (2019-07-06 22:40:24+00:00): Коллега. здравствуйте.
Подскажите, откуда берёте адресную информацию для правок?
parukhin (2019-07-06 22:41:53+00:00): И для POI вдохновение?
chachafish (2019-07-07 13:36:31+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Are you certain about this address? You've added 100 Steele, but the building is located at 250 Steele Street. Also, just so you know, "Steele" would be incorrect. This would be "Steele Street". Thanks :)
Artemisia Vulgaris (2019-07-07 16:26:32+00:00): You're right, this was a mistake. I misread the unit number as the street address while mapping. Thanks for catching the error. I've corrected it in an updated changeset to the node.
user_5359 (2019-07-06 03:58:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare  .
jmapb (2019-07-14 15:04:23+00:00): wetland! now that's funny...
santamariense (2019-07-06 00:36:44+00:00): Só um detalhe: Tente não conectar áreas aos eixos das ruas. Para isso aproxime mais o zoom. Bons mapeamentos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71946388
olehz (2020-08-10 14:34:33+00:00): тормоз, ти розумієш, що нічого доброго не зробив? про GPS-треки по ходу нічого не чув? взяв зсунув дороги на 10 метрів невідомо за яким принципом
olehz (2020-08-10 14:57:39+00:00): сорян, це "User7 - Lightcyphers" по ходу масово вандалить дороги
Sowa1980 (2019-08-14 03:03:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, убедительная просьба не удалять точки, и не ломать геометрию объектов и дорог, так как Вам может казаться они избыточными, все Ваши правки я буду откатывать в Тамбовской области. они лишены смысла. Надеюсь Вы правильно поймете меня.
Если Ваши действия не прикратятся буден Вынужден написать жалобу в DWG с просьбой о блокировке вашего акаунта.
mzioma (2019-07-19 16:43:24+00:00): Cześć,

Zlikwidowałeś istniejącą drogę tworząc obok nową proposed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701978764). Proszę, jeśli dokonujesz jakiś zmian upewnij się jaki jest stan faktyczny - nie sugeruj się zdjęciami satelitarnymi które mogą być nieaktualne.