piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:36:14+00:00): Hi sefax311,
this changeset has added some errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.80718&lat=39.82661&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128328272

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Discostu36 (2022-11-03 12:41:10+00:00): "Sollten" ist nicht unsere Aufgabe, es kommt darauf an, ob der Fahrradweg benutzungspflichtig ist oder nicht.
Mordechai23 (2022-11-21 10:41:15+00:00): jakiś tramwaj jeździ teraz przez stary most mieszczański?
gscholz (2022-11-03 08:02:41+00:00): Hi Muhammet5353,
this changeset has added some errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=26.97134&lat=38.56381&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128329165

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:31:17+00:00): Hi Muhammet5353, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:34:01+00:00): Hi buse14,
this changeset has added some errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.61498&lat=40.73423&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128329448

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
goedegazelle (2022-11-01 11:53:24+00:00): Ik heb de noexit tag opnieuw verwijderd omdat zichtbaar is dat de weg hier niet doodloopt voor alle verkeer.

Het zij erg fijn zijn als de noexit niet botweg wordt teruggeplaatst zoals tot nu toe elke keer is gebeurd.
pjvds (2022-11-01 12:54:05+00:00): As per documentation: 

Ways ending near another way. This error is weary important for routing programs. These endnodes should be connected to passing ways, if they are indeed connected. If they are not, you can tag this node with tag noexit=yes.
Tjuro (2022-11-02 08:44:52+00:00): volgens bgt zit hier een opening die heb ik dus toegevoegd, geleve eerst checken voordat je noexit toevoegd
Kays (2023-04-29 17:48:20+00:00): Thank you for edit. There is already way 783705460 → https://www.osm.org/way/783705460 that documents this building. I have deleted your building now, see changeset 135512876 → https://www.osm.org/changeset/135512876
MapAnalyser465 (2022-11-01 12:18:38+00:00): Thank you, I forgot to do this! 😅
eriom (2022-11-01 08:30:40+00:00): Danke! Hab's jetzt wohl kapiert ... :-}
(Ich bin über die unglückliche Formulierung von StreetComplete gestolpert, wo *für die 'überbrückte' Strasse* gefragt wird, "Was ist die Durchfahrtshöhe unter dieser Brücke?", und nicht für die Brücke. Das erscheint mir (als Laien) reichlich irreführend.)
canfe (2022-11-13 11:19:58+00:00): I vari percorsi del cimitero vanno uniti con un nodo quando si incrociano.
Però... qui c'è un guado! Davvero c'è??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128331434
Renato Lapio (2022-11-13 21:42:13+00:00): ah ok pensavo il nodo si creasse in automatico
comunque non c'è nessun guado non mi sembrava dei aver inserito un guado o un corso d'acqua :(
grazie
canfe (2022-11-14 06:02:21+00:00): Comunque per dubbi, son qua a disposizione.
Ma sei della zona? Vedo che mappi in giro per il mondo...
Renato Lapio (2022-11-14 08:57:57+00:00): ok grazie ancora!
sono "originario" della zona ;-) ma vivo a milano e sto facendo un po' di esperienza nel mondo OSM per imparare
mueschel (2022-11-25 10:02:49+00:00): Schau bitte mal nach diesem Knoten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1965126756

Er hat zwei 'direction' Tags, ohne Richtungsangabe.
skquinn (2022-11-01 08:55:32+00:00): Hi,

While we welcome well-formed additions of local businesses to the map, this looks too much like SEO spam, especially given the blatant ad copy in the changeset comment, and has been deleted accordingly. (Changeset comments are not indexed by search engines and are usually only seen by other mappers, so placing ad copy there will not have the desired result.)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ivanbranco (2022-11-01 10:30:19+00:00): Ciao Marco,

così hai eliminato anche i dati relativi al civico però, che ora non risulta piu' presente nel database. Dovevi cancellare solo amenity=bank
e lasciare almeno i tag addr:street e addr:housenumber

sistemo io. Buon mapping :)
jarema90 (2022-11-01 10:40:25+00:00): Wczoraj przechodziłem tamtędy, poprawiłem przebieg a Ty wróciłeś do starej wersji - dlaczego ?
englu (2022-11-01 13:04:52+00:00): Twoja poprawka w ogóle nie pokrywała się ze śladami ze Stravy (https://www.strava.com/heatmap#17.89/20.63548/49.69170/hot/all). Tutaj zrzut ekranu: https://we.tl/t-W2J3fKilMg. Czy powstały tam nowe drogi, a te stare są zarośnięte albo zaorane? Możliwe, że twój ślad GPS był niedokładny lub przesunięty? Nagrywałeś kilkoma urządzeniami czy jednym? Pozdrawiam.
jarema90 (2022-11-01 13:44:37+00:00): Cześć, nie nagrywałem - korzystałem z mapy "in situ" z włączonym GPS i lokalizacją po sieci. 
1) Odchodząca na północ ścieżka - wiele ludzi sobie skraca ten ostry (90o) zakręt po polanie aczkolwiek szlak prowadzi po ubitej drodze (bardziej na wschód po granicy rezerwatu)
2) ścieżka na wschód (równoleżnikowo prowadzona) - jest tam kamienista droga która po opadach zamienia się w błoto stąd wiele ludzi obchodzi ją "brzegiem" po stronie północnej. Poza tym proszę popatrzeć na ortofotomapę z Geoportalu - po moich poprawkach się zgadza. Strava korzysta z Mapboxa - to dużo gorszy podkład do mapowania.
Pozdrawiam
englu (2022-11-01 16:10:48+00:00): Dzięki za szczegółowe wyjaśnienie.
1) Czy jednak ta ścieżka nie powinna być przesunięta nieco na wschód? https://we.tl/t-vO49cA2Rdl. Czy w ogóle nie powinno tam być dwóch ścieżek na mapie - jedna na wschód od granicy  rezerwatu, a druga ścinająca zakręt?
englu (2022-11-01 16:40:31+00:00): A odnośnie Stravy i Mapboxa to nie chodzi mi o podkład satelitarny tylko warstwę nagranych śladów z GPS, która jest dostępna i można ją wpiąć np. w JOSM, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava. Warto jej użyć, bo często pozwala zweryfikować czy Ortofotomapa z Geoportalu jest aktualna.
jarema90 (2022-11-01 18:50:15+00:00): Tam jest jedna ścieżka, która w zależności od kierunku trasy (W-N, E-N) jest różnie skracana przez ludzi.
https://we.tl/t-CMmG3L8VDR
Co do tej ścieżki na wschód to widać dokładnie że znajduje się na północ od drogi (którą ja poprawiałem) - może trzeba ją dodać jako dodatkową linie ?
englu (2022-11-02 09:29:08+00:00): To może już nie duplikować, skoro są tak blisko, a szlak idzie drogą.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CoyKoi (2022-11-04 22:00:36+00:00): Noticed today that pedestrian access has been closed again.. I guess this will be intermittently opened/closed, so will leave it mapped as it is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128332238
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:21:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10121408490/history

Hello!

What you meant by shop=plastic here?

What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?

Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit?
SomeoneElse (2023-03-05 10:35:53+00:00): This changeset has some problems - the southern area is a bit crude and intersects some SJU buildings; the northern one has been added as the new building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474497957/history only.  That is run by them, but so is much of the adjacent land - see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9502748999 .  I bet that you could complete that properly using only open data such as the Cadastral Parcels - in fact you could also use those to improve the accuracy of the new hospital to the north as well.
borovac (2023-03-06 09:00:50+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,

I have fix geometries but I need help with ground near hospital. Is this park or some other land type (53.9819376, -1.068647)
Also, I do not have any ground truth for the parcel north of North Field (53.9842501, -1.0745212). Is this also part of university or not?
All best Milan
SomeoneElse (2023-03-25 17:32:52+00:00): Hello,
I've just had a chance to check again, and the noticeboard at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.98187/-1.06898 still has a note on it saying that it's operated by St John's University.  My guess is that they own all the land there (it used to belong to Rowntree's / Nestle).  There are no parcel boundaries between there are the sports field.
It's not a park as such, but public access is permitted.  There is a sign saying that it has not been dedicated for public access, so it's "permissive" not "yes" access.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-26 18:24:33+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3614396
borovac (2023-03-26 18:32:30+00:00): Hi Andy,

I willlook tomorrow.  I am not able to check now, I don't have access to a computer.

All best Milan
SomeoneElse (2023-03-26 18:35:36+00:00): No panic - I only uploaded a photo as I was walking past.
borovac (2023-03-27 06:13:58+00:00): Hi Andy,
Since I can not find enough information, is it OK to mark this just as area=yes, access=permissive and add it to University polygon or should I just put a map note for someone local to resolve this?
All best Milan
SomeoneElse (2023-03-27 10:26:19+00:00): Hello,
If it was me I'd just leave it as it is :)
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-04-04 14:41:33+00:00): Actually, re my statement above ("There are no parcel boundaries between there are the sports field") I've just spotted that there is a parcel boundary between the "park" (if that is what it is - I'm really not sure) and the river.  I didn't see it before because the river was in the wrong place, and I've now moved it.
elsy1 (2022-11-01 13:14:43+00:00): ویرایش مشکل دارد و باعث خرابی در نقشه شد  لطفا دقت کنید تشکر  reverted 128333471
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Danesh Ar (2022-11-01 09:26:45+00:00): عالی
redd (2025-07-24 09:17:03+00:00): This Changeset is far to big. There are changes in Germany, South Europe and South East Asia.

How shall we discuss the changes?

Since my concern is in Germany, i raise in in german:

Bezüglich des Denkmals am Nordbahnhof [1], das scheint am Treppenaufgang zu hängen.  Das wheelchair=yes halte ich daher für unplausibel und habe es reverted. Falls dies doch anders ist, bitte ich um Antwort.


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3756417054/history

friendly mapper greetings,

redd
redd (2025-07-24 11:11:38+00:00): ok, thanks to the help of dbsus it was clarified, additional to the artwork in the stairchase there is a stele artwork on the platform. Therefore i readd the wheelchair=yes
Kin Sapalot (2022-11-01 11:48:43+00:00): Hi Nights,

Just curious, which routing app/algo had an issue with this? 
(I've been fixing some pedestrian routings as well, but never noticed this case in OSRM, Graphhopper or OSMand)

Thanks,
Kin
Kin Sapalot (2022-11-01 11:55:32+00:00): I'm also curious because NL routing rules imply foot=yes on cycleways: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Netherlands
Nighto (2022-11-01 12:11:51+00:00): Oh, that's good to know. I had the issue with Wandrer.earth, which uses OSM data to know what routes you have visited at least once based on your Strava activities.

https://imgur.com/a/ln419ef

In this example, it "paints blue" the roads you've visited near your activity, but notice it will not paint the ways which have highway with sidewalk=separate that does not have a footway adjacent to it.

So I might have to file a bug report to the tool author and revert this changeset. Thanks for spotting it!
Nighto (2022-11-02 14:36:58+00:00): Reverted with changeset 128396070.
Nighto (2022-11-02 14:38:28+00:00): Just FYI, discussed with Wandrer.earth author (Craig) and he mentioned someone else already informed him about the NL rules for foot being implicitly routed on cycleways without foot=yes. He is working on a fix on his side. Sorry for the noise and thanks again for spotting Kim Sapalot.
Kin Sapalot (2022-11-02 16:34:09+00:00): Hey! No problem, that's what this community is for, right 😀

Interesting idea for wandrer.earth to try and to tie Strava tracks to routable features. Cool that you followed up with them!
vasony (2023-01-18 20:44:58+00:00): Szia!

Régi újbuda ortót használsz, ez alapján ne mozgasd odébb a kukákat légy szíves, van már 2021-es, csak az iD-ban nem látszik, és valószínű a 2023-as se fog.

pl:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6267884411

Köszi, Tamás
dcf77 (2023-01-19 10:05:59+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Rendben, figyelni fogok erre. Köszi, hogy szóltál!
eggie (2022-11-01 10:27:48+00:00): Herzlich willkommen bei OSM die Niederlande

Alle Zugangskennzeichen sind bereits voreingestellt Das heisst 'Default'. 
Der Name des Weges ist wohl nicht Naturschutzgebiet, keine Hunde.

dog=no is möglich. 


Ihre Ergänzungen:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128334769

Gruß
Eggie
eggie (2022-11-01 10:43:28+00:00): Reverted by changeset #128338062

If you have any questions you are welcome. 

Please don't use name= to describe items. Don't use 'German'  outside Germany. 

Das Naturschutzgebiet Waterdunen is schon 'getagd' in OSM. 
dog=no is possible or dog=leashed if permitted.

Better never use access=yes or no in combination with other tagging.

Enjoy mapping,
Greetz,
eggie
ottwiz (2022-11-01 09:43:10+00:00): + Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta is used for imagery, but I forgot to add that
trial (2022-11-06 20:50:03+00:00): You are ON a bridge. There is no maximum hieght by definition. Don't add useless information. IT would make sense for the railway, not for the bridge.
trial (2022-11-06 21:11:03+00:00): Sorry, please ignore. I misread weight / height.
HPrivakos (2022-11-08 10:26:18+00:00): Pas de probleme.
J'utilise l'application StreetComplete qui pose des questions assez précise sur certain endroit, donc en théorie il ne devrait pas y avoir d'erreur de tags
trial (2022-11-06 20:47:15+00:00): Please refrain from doing that: first check on the land registry layer. Here you removed valuable information. On the land registry the removed parts are as initially described parts without hard  walls (concrete or stones) but usually glass.
literan (2022-11-01 16:53:01+00:00): странные кавычки тут добавились https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5421238420

это баг ЭвриДора?
alexey_zakharenkov (2022-11-01 18:05:23+00:00): Такие ёлочки предлагает виртуальная клавиатура на моём андроиде. Думал, может они только в телефоне так выглядят.
Я пройдусь жосмом по своей выгрузке из ED и исправлю.
opendcc (2022-11-02 06:34:56+00:00): Hallo,

hier sind leider ein paar Relationen zerbrochen (u.a. Buslinien und der Jakobsweg). Kein Problem, wir werden das wieder reparieren. Aber als Tipp bei der nächsten Änderung: Wege möglichst nicht löschen, sondern auf den neuen Verlauf schieben. 

Hast Du vielleicht GPS-Tracks oder Fotos vom neuen Kreisverkehr? Insbesondere Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen und sonstige Verkehrsregeln (Fußgängerfurten o.ä.)
opendcc (2022-11-02 06:36:43+00:00): Noch eine Frage: hast Du ev. Kenntnis vom Baustand des Umbaus oben bei Schöftenhub?
barkley72 (2022-11-02 08:38:43+00:00): Ich hab nur die Nebenstraße mit dem Fahrrad getrackt. Die genauen Verläufe rund um den Kreisel passen noch nicht. Die Straße nördlich und nordöstlich des Kreisels müsste eigentlich so sein wie der Planungszustand.
Weiter oben an der B588, wo jetzt ein Feldweg kreuzt, gehört noch eine Brücke hin, der Anschluss an die Straße, die von Süden her auf die Bundesstraße trifft, pasdt auch nicht.
Bei Schöftenhub sollten die Straßen so sein, wie die Planung, hab ich aber auch nicht gemessen. Und ob der Verlauf der B588 wieder ganz genau so ist, wie der alte, weiß ich auch nicht.
map per (2023-04-29 20:49:34+00:00): Hallo Bratananio,

bist du dir Sicher, das es das Restaurant dort noch gibt? Auf der Webseite wird eine andere Adresse genannt und direkt neben der Node ist ein seit drei Jahren geschlossenes Restaurant mit dem gleichen Namen (1).

Weißt du noch wann / ob du dir das vor Ort angeschaut hast? Ist "on location" gleichbedeutend mit survey?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390080594
Bratananio (2023-04-30 07:07:56+00:00): Ja, ich war vor ca. 3 Monaten dort beim Essen. Vermutlich ist es wiedereröffnet worden?
map per (2023-04-30 16:10:38+00:00): Danke, hab das Restaurant am alten Node (1) eingetragen und die in ein Restaurant umgewandelte Adresse wieder zur einzelnen Addressnode gemacht
Eino81 (2023-11-05 11:25:47+00:00): Hi, Ersi and Bing did not say, I guess, that this track is private... I will update that...
blxght (2022-11-01 14:29:07+00:00): Raczej nie powinno się usuwać bez powodu gruntów ornych zmapowanych osobno :c Jest to też poprawne i jeśli ktoś ma dane o rodzaju uprawy/produkcie może osobno pododawać i na niektórych mapach będzie się pokazywać, mamy dużo osobno zmapowanych w polsce, np w okolicy Warszawy
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-11-01 11:44:01+00:00): سلام
منظور شما از این ادیتهایی که روی نقشه اعمال کردین چیست؟ چرا اسامی انگلیسی هستند؟
milaaad (2022-11-01 12:04:57+00:00): شما فارسیش کنید مشکلی نیست ، پدرمون درومده هربار اسنپ میزنیم از کوچه بغلی و خاکی میاره درصورتی که کوچه خودمون اسفالته
Frans S (2022-11-01 12:53:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
In addition to my comment on tasks 1150 1152 I want you to refresh your knowledge about tagging highways.
See this wiki which describes which task should be used in a certain situation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Pay particular attention to the 'service road'tag.
Also decide to tag a trace on the importance, width (< 2 mtr = path) and if it is not a irrigation channel (they are also subject to mapping),
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128337129
Noen (2022-11-01 13:37:41+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Openstreetmap! Speidergruppa er sikket på den adressen, men adresse-punktet og gruppa kan være to forskjellige noder, det er ingen grunn til å slå de sammen.
gektor1488 (2022-11-29 11:23:40+00:00): please, do not map military objects during the war in Ukraine
gscholz (2022-11-02 07:57:26+00:00): Hi Marcel,
your recent changesets have added some errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=30.56392&lat=39.58981&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128337379

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:31:54+00:00): Hi Marcel, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Marcel Timmermam (2022-11-05 20:47:48+00:00): Hi Guido, Thanks for the remarks. I have adjusted the paths you mentioned. Hopefully, it is correct now.
Marcel
A67-A67 (2022-11-01 15:59:12+00:00): Dit was een weg met een vrachtwagenverbod uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer (dus hgv=destination) is dit daadwerkelijk uitgebreid naar alle motorvoertuigen (motor_vehicle=destination)?

In het geval van het veelvoorkomende verkeersbord C12 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_C12.svg) uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer is naast motor_vehicle=destination ook moped=yes nodig, omdat bromfietsen onder motor_vehicle vallen, maar niet onder verkeersbord C12.
user_1957122 (2022-11-01 16:13:29+00:00): Je hebt gelijk. Excuses. Mijn fout, verkeerd gezien. Ik wijzig het terug naar hoe het was.
A67-A67 (2022-11-01 19:37:10+00:00): Bedankt!
gektor1488 (2022-11-29 11:24:05+00:00): please, do not map military objects during the war in Ukraine
highflyer74 (2022-11-03 06:26:16+00:00): Moin! Im Zuge dieses Edits kommt es hier

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.60322&lat=54.54009&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

zu Geometrieproblemen. Könntest du dir das noch einmal ansehen? Eigentlich sollte JOSM dir entsprechende Warnungen werfen. Der "Qualitätssicherung" würde es helfen, wenn du einen Änderungssatz von den geografischen Ausmaßen etwas kleiner gestalten könntest. Danke!

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gern!