piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2022-09-28 17:54:34+00:00): Hello,

Can you use more specific changeset comments? Adding is what we all do! But what did you add?
Please read: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
*abq* (2022-12-07 10:53:19+00:00): Hallo Jango,
ich habe auf der MTB WM Strecke in Kirchzarten das bicycle=designated entfernt. Das sollte wirklich nur für ausgeschilderte Radwege verwendet werden. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, ist nicht einmal eine Auschilderung vorhanden, dass Radfahren erlaubt wäre. Falls inzwischen doch, bitte bicycle=yes, aber nicht designated
VG Reiner
Erlen Dur (2022-11-09 20:10:00+00:00): Thanka Luis. I cycled there this year and made some notes for changing this confusing and wrong tagging of the MEX1 here in this area. But I couldn't figure out, when which section has which name. You did it! Cheers.
ika-chan! (2023-01-28 12:37:05+00:00): In way 131879306, I wish to know why did you delete the street lighting data? We use the lit=* to indicate if the path or road is lit at night: Greece does not have the best safety record as far as I know.
seichter (2023-01-28 13:21:21+00:00): Streets and paths outside of settlements are very rarely lit, especially mountain paths. Worldwide you may find only a handful of them, they then should get a lit=yes.
lit=no makes only sense in populated areas where streets and footways usually are lit.
lit=no is usually set by newbies who think that all checkmarks in presets have to be set.
Sometimes you may even find a boat=no.

lit=no is superfluous, here but it leave it as demanded since it does no harm.
kortgodt (2022-10-20 12:54:59+00:00): Er denne vej blevet åbnet for gennemkørsel. Har været lukket i snart 20 år. Glædeligt hvis den er åben.
eggie (2022-09-26 05:40:40+00:00): Dag Gait...
Tip... Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes.

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 08:40:19+00:00): Het cafe heb ik verplaatst naar adresnode nr 50. Het pand ernaast. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 09:22:05+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode
MVG
eggie
skyper (2022-11-09 14:21:56+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-14 23:22:40+00:00): Hi skyper, 
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
skyper (2022-11-09 14:26:17+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-15 00:04:50+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
skyper (2022-11-09 14:25:36+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-14 23:56:49+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
skyper (2022-11-09 14:24:45+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128101654
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-11-14 23:33:20+00:00): Hi skyper,
changes reverted.

Regards
😎
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Chivos (2022-10-21 10:23:22+00:00): Bonjour Lemalic,
J'avais une question concernant la ligne T2. J'ai vu que tu as passé certains axes en busway (par exemple rue Jean Moulin). Est-ce que la rue est désormais uniquement destinée au BHNS (plus d'automobilistes ?)
englu (2022-09-26 09:25:42+00:00): Czy ścieżka 582281733 przestała istnieć w terenie? I czy na ścieżce 550292704 były jakieś oznaczenia żółtego szlaku?
adas (2022-09-26 10:11:16+00:00): Możliwe, że się pospieszyłem. Zasugerowałem się tym, że na 550292704 jest duży ruch (a była to oznaczona tylko jako path). A na tej 582281733  nie ma żadnego ruchu na Strava Heatmap.
Wnioskowałem, że trasę budowano i cały ruch się przeniósł na trasę Eurovelo. Możliwe, że błędnie zalożyłem (ale nie ma na tym 582281733  żadnego ruchu).
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#15.82/18.99806/54.33801/hot/ride

Mogę przywrócić, ale wydaję mi się, że tam ludzie już nie chodzą/nie jeżdżą.
adas (2022-09-26 10:13:17+00:00): 1097932804 - tej nie było też na mapie (a jest ruch na heatmapie).
englu (2022-09-26 11:12:22+00:00): Właśnie widziałem na heatmapie, że nie ma ruchu, ale na StreetView z 2017 widać tam żółty szlak: https://www.google.com/maps/@54.3365196,18.9899036,3a,20.1y,359.39h,93.05t,359.54r/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipPCEWCFiPseAzndzKb0HfA07SJD3RPvsZymQE7U!2e10!7i7200!8i3600. Ponadto przejścia szlakiem żółtym z tego roku idą właśnie tą ścieżką: https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/track/a29aa715. Jeśli możesz to przywróć tę ścieżkę do czasu sprawdzenia w terenie. Dzięki.
A Hall (2022-10-13 13:44:05+00:00): Wonderful job adding lots of recreational trails here! Are you aware of the VCGI LiDAR - DEM Hillshade? With local knowledge and other resources, this layer can be really valuable for detailed mapping of areas with poor aerial visibility. 

Happy mapping!
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-26 13:02:33+00:00): Ciao. Questa feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10052390478 non e' gia' compresa in questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2379163865? Ciao, Andrea
ivanbranco (2022-09-26 13:10:07+00:00): Sì, mi ero dimenticato di quel tag sennò l'avrei rimosso o cambiato in atm=separate. Sistemo stasera
CapitaineMoustache (2023-05-09 09:00:30+00:00): Bonjour ClemFlippy !

J'attire votre attention sur le fait que la Véloire, notamment sur les portions que vous avez modifiées dans ce groupe de modifications sont des portions de voies vertes en site propre.
C'est-à-dire qu'il ne s'agit pas de pistes cyclables : ici, piétons, vélos ou encore patins à roulettes cohabitent sur la même voie.
Les voies vertes sont signalées par le panneau C115 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:France_road_sign_C115.svg), ce qui est le cas ici.

Le wiki OSM recommande pour les voies vertes d'utiliser highway=path : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Je me propose d'annuler votre groupe de modifications moi-même, avec votre consentement.

N'hésitez pas à réagir, si vous avez des suggestions ou des questions.

Bonne cartographie ! ;)
CapitaineMoustache (2023-05-18 14:08:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Malgré que vous n’ayez pas répondu au précédent commentaire, j'ai pris sur moi d'annuler ce groupe de modifications et de faire revenir cette portion de voie verte à "highway=path" : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136257444#map=13/46.1002/4.0909

J'espère que vous n'en prendrez pas ombrage, sentez-vous libre de réagir, je suis toujours à l'écoute !

Bonne continuation sur OpenStreetMap ! ;)
AgusQui (2023-02-17 13:21:42+00:00): Esta plataforma no es de acceso público por lo tanto no corresponde public_transport=platform, por favor prestar más atención a las advertencias de iD, sea coherente, es la segunda vez que le debo corregir esto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373721210/history
Frans S (2022-09-27 14:23:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
Can you fix these issues ?



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126631463
anieto (2023-03-23 17:55:49+00:00): Hola Gabriel. Pasé el otro día por aquí en bici y las áreas de descanso no se parece en nada a lo que hay en la realidad: una no existe y la otra está al otro lado de la carretera. Viendo el source ahora entiendo por qué.
Voy a actualizarlas en base a las fotos que saqué. 
Gracias por añadir la base :)
Gabriel44200 (2023-04-20 16:10:22+00:00): Genial!
MrMoehritz (2022-12-20 19:33:26+00:00): Hallo route_not_possible,

willkommen bei OSM!
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 05:29:03+00:00): Parkas ir miškas yra visiškai skirtingi nieko bendro tarpusavyje neturintys objektai. Miškas yra plotas, kuriame auga medžiai. Parkas yra oficialiai pripažintas plotas, kurio viduje gali būti ir miškas, ir pieva, ir vanduo ir dar daug kas. Atstačiau teisingą buvusį parko žymėjimą. Miškas ten jau yra pažymėtas, miškas daug daugiau ploto užima nei šaltinių parkas.
MindaugasS (2022-09-26 07:17:58+00:00): Kaip pasakysit. Bet tada turėtų taip pat atrodyti ir Kalnų parkas, Vingio parkas, Sapiegų parkas, Antakalnio Šilo miško parkas, Fabijoniškių miško parkas, Jomanto miško parkas, Šeškinės miško parkas, Pasakų parkas ir Lūžių parkas. Kai šitas miškas švyti šviesiai žalia spalva, kaip kokie miesto skverai, o pvz. Sapiegų parkas, kuris tikrai yra parkas, rodomas tamsiai žalias kaip miškas, atrodo labai klaidinančiai, tiesiog priešingai tam, kas yra tikrovė.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 09:47:01+00:00): Kodėl pagrindinis matomas OSM renderis OSM-Carto taip kreivai rodo - aš nesigilinsiu - mano galva OSM-Carto yra tragiškas dalykas iš kartografinės pusės ir jo nereikėtų niekam rodyti. Aš rūpinuosi, kad duomenys būtų teisingi, kad būtų galima padaryti teisingus žemėlapius. Sapiegų parkas turi savo miško objektą https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14564522 ir savo parko objektą https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3254972. Iš šitų objektų jau kas kaip nori - tas taip gali ir braižyti žemėlapius :-)
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 09:49:50+00:00): Kad būtų aiškiau: jei darau kokį nors turistinį žemėlapį - tai uždedu parką, jei darau topografinį žemėlapį - dedu tik mišką, parkai visiškai neįdomūs būna, nes parkas yra tik popieriuje egzistuojantis dalykas.
MindaugasS (2022-09-26 12:39:29+00:00): Gerai, p. Tomai; apie skirtumą tarp fizinių ir loginių objektų suprantu. Taip pat suprantu, kad skirtingų žemėlapių kūrėjai gali pasirinkti tik norimas objektų klases. Kol kas nesuprantu štai ko: kai toje pačioje vietoje yra keli objektai, kas pro ką turi persišviesti? Pavyzdžiui, jei pievoje yra miškelis? Arba miške yra pievelė? O joje dar sporto aikštelė? Ir visa tai priklauso loginiam parkui? Arba mokyklos kiemui? Pastatai ir keliai, kaip suprantu, persišviečia pro bet ką. O kiti objektai? Ar mūsų žymėjimai gali turėti įtakos, kas pro ką persišvies?
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 12:52:26+00:00): Pieva nebūna miškelyje, pieva būna iškirpta iš miškelio. T.y. viename taške negali būti ir pieva, ir miškas.
Parkas, mano galva, turėtų būti permatomai rodomas ant viršaus fizinių objektų - miškų, pievų ir pan. Kodėl OSM-Carto tas dalykas su identišku žymėjimu kartais veikia vienaip, o kartais - kitaip - nežinau. Spėju, kad gal objektai nėra hierarchijoje atskirti ir todėl rezultatas priklauso nuo atsitiktinumo - kuris objektas duomenų bazėje būna pirmesnis. Sporto aikštelė yra atskira klasė, tai jos neiškerpam iš pievos ar miško. Bet ji dažniausiai kartografo bus braižoma (jei įdomi) virš  pievos/miško.
MindaugasS (2022-09-26 16:14:47+00:00): Gerai, ačiū už paaiškinimą. Beje, OSM-Carto žemėlapyje net ir dabar, po Jūsų paskutinio pakeitimo, Spalvotųjų šaltinių parkas atrodo tamsiai žalias, t.y. jame persišviečia miškas. Tikriausiai, kaip Jūs ir rašote, susisluoksniavimo tvarkai turi įtakos objektų sukūrimo eilės tvarka. Panašus dalykas buvo nutikęs su Antakalnio Šilo miško parku: ten niekaip nenorėjo persišviesti sporto aikštelė, esanti pievelėje. Ji persišvietė tik tada, kai pievelę pakeičiau iš „meadow“ į „grass“. Kai Jūs pakeitėte vėl į „meadow“, sporto aikštelė liko persišvietusi. Turbūt šis eksperimentas rodo, kad, jei susisluoksniavimo tvarka yra neteisinga, pajudinus objektus (pakeitus objekto žymėjimą į neteisingą, o tada vėl į teisingą), jie būna persluoksniuojami (ir galima tikėtis, kad jau teisingai).
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 16:49:30+00:00): Tai, kad objektų pajudinimas įtakoja jų vaizdą OSM-Carto, yra dar vienas požymis, kad tai labai labai prasta duomenų vizualizacija.
MindaugasS (2022-09-28 11:44:05+00:00): Lyginant OSM-Carto render'inimą su kitomis programomis, pavyzdžiui, su tokia Trekarta, kuri naudoja OSM duomenis, kartais susidaro įspūdis, kad tose vietose, kur yra buvę render'inimo problemų OSM-Carto, jų yra ir kituose render'intuvuose. Pavyzdžiui, su ta sporto aikštele, esančia Antakalnio Šilo miško parke. Žiūrėsiu, kas bus, kai Trekarta atsinaujins duomenis.

Beje, OSM-Carto dabar kažkas vyksta Sapiegų parke: atrodo, kad šviesiai žalia loginio parko spalva palaipsniui ima viršų prieš tamsiai žalią fizinio miško spalvą (iš pradžių lopais, po to jie plečiasi). Tas pat ir Spalvotųjų šaltinių parke. Nenorėčiau trukdyti be reikalo, bet ar ten viskas gerai su miško objektais?
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-28 11:56:50+00:00): Reikia turėti omeny, kad OSM-Carto kaladėlėmis atnaujina, naršyklė kažkokias kaladėles būna užsikešavusi, tai nebūtinai viskas iš karto atsinaujina, bet galima bandyti su F5 bandyti priversti atsisiųsti naujas kaladėles. Bet kokiu atveju lieku prie nuomonės, kad OSM-Carto yra labai blogai, daug kas padaryta blogai, ant snarglių, todėl ir toks veikimas.
MindaugasS (2022-09-28 12:19:58+00:00): Bandau net su Shift-F5 :)
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-26 05:31:18+00:00): Hello. You should either explain why are you removing driveway from ways which are created specifically for buses, or we will simply be adding them back.
felipeeugenio (2022-11-14 12:16:15+00:00): Hola Paul. Estás agregando pistas de incorporación como vías propias. Eso es incorrecto. Las estoy cambiando por lanes de incoporación dentro de la misma vía.
saludos
Awo (2022-11-14 13:45:03+00:00): hola Felipe. Vale gracias, tu sabes más de eso...reviso para ver como queda. Saludos.
canfe (2026-04-22 09:24:27+00:00): access=yes vuol dire che ci possono passare anche i TIR.
Corretto come da wiki.
Kento Kei (2022-09-26 00:09:26+00:00): more on it: Cahokia Heights is also not as large as the other two main places in St. Clair county, Belleville and O'Fallon, which are the 1st and 2nd largest cities in southern Illinois respectively.
Kovoschiz (2022-09-26 07:53:26+00:00): Please don't move `=peak` away from `=ridge`. If there are separate ones, add another back to the origin.
VA00 (2022-10-09 06:50:36+00:00): Plac budowy jest ogrodzony blaszanym murem?
syntex (2022-10-09 09:25:58+00:00): Na razie zamieniłem tylko trawe na plac budowy, obszar zagrodzony na pewno nachodzi też na obszar placu
Frans S (2022-09-26 08:58:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not in according to the HOT/ OSM tagging instructions of highways.
Roads in agricultural areas as access can never be tagged as "tertiary or residential."
Please read this wiki about tagging highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126633016
mariotomo (2022-09-26 22:30:35+00:00): hola. creo que hiciste algo raro con un semáforo, quieres revisarlo? necesitas ayuda? cuál era el efecto deseado?
mariotomo (2022-09-26 22:35:33+00:00): lo moví ahí donde creo que debería estar, pero si lo revisas, mejor.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126674045
Frans S (2022-09-26 08:21:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
This is a building only project. Please concentrate on mapping buildings.
When you map residential areas, please follow the contours of the build areas, not just a few straight lines and do not connect the nodes to other features like waterways,



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126633295
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-28 10:51:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped very precise.
As  you can see, the sidewalls of the buildings are often good visible. Please just move the mapping on the footprint.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126634317
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-28 10:42:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
However, you also mapped sun panels as buildings. Dark grey objects without shadow, which shows it is above groundlevel.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126634440
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.