piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sylvain M (2024-06-13 18:20:12+00:00): J'au vu ici [1] qu'il s'agit d'un chemin creux, et qu'il semble praticable à vélo.
J'ai corrigé 😉

[1] https://www.google.com/maps/@48.4216303,0.0557158,3a,75y,70.79h,82.56t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipPGO4YlSbNgcw3UU-dAyJs6UIgx9g1ELSGWp5Zw!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPGO4YlSbNgcw3UU-dAyJs6UIgx9g1ELSGWp5Zw%3Dw900-h600-k-no-pi7.442048740353755-ya342.1487118221918-ro0.2598930299282074-fo90!7i5760!8i2880?coh=205410&entry=ttu
adas (2022-04-08 05:24:50+00:00): Pytanie - a ulica Łąkowa nie jest już może gotowa? Bo niby wg informacji miała być skończona do konca zeszłego roku.
I czy dobrze widzę, że tam będzie droga rowerowa też?
bxl-forever (2022-03-20 19:47:35+00:00): Hello,

This is creating a strange duplicate, and the Brussels UrBIS reference does not have any housenumber for this building.

Housenumber 6B on Drève des Tumuli/Tumulidreef is already used on this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226405416

You added a housenumber but did not associate it with a street.  Did you mean this one is 6B on Clos des Chênes/Eikhove instead?

Thanks in advance.
user_4493657 (2022-03-21 10:34:45+00:00): Hello. Why did you extend the proposed (as yet non-existent) Basil Street by part despite the current and very sharp aerial photos?
u1905 (2022-03-21 18:42:48+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the comment. The extension, based on a map from the local municipality (when assigning the street name) has contained a future state of the street. After verification in the terrain I've marked the extension as a proposed part.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-20 23:31:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
zstadler (2022-10-05 21:54:45+00:00): Hello Yitzchak,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=restricted says: "Please use access=private with proper overriding tags instead"

Please change the access tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592384263 accordingly
MoistTangerine2 (2022-03-21 01:51:39+00:00): ?
喵耳引力波 (2022-03-22 07:57:38+00:00): 这里是 中国

请不要把名称标记为韩语
maraf24 (2022-03-20 18:05:20+00:00): Do wycofania.
HirschKauz (2022-03-21 16:06:45+00:00): Hi Max Mustermann_ !
Ist dies mit Sicherheit in Supermarkt? Auch wenn er so heißt, scheint es mir eher ein Tante-Emma-Laden zu sein und da wäre shop=convenience angebrachter :-)
V:vigr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118704046
HirschKauz (2022-03-21 16:08:14+00:00): ups :vigr sollte 
"Viele Grüße, HirschKauz  
Bleib gesund!"  
heissen ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118704046
MaxMustermann_ (2022-03-21 18:23:54+00:00): Hallo, ich würde den Markt eher als Supermarkt bezeichnen.
Kann leider keine Bilder von mir anbieten, aber auf Google Maps findet man sehr gute und viele Bilder. Kann bestätigen, dass es dort exakt so aussieht.

MfG

https://www.google.de/maps/place/Super+am+Markt/@50.8599042,6.7548821,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipO5bcb75K0vhvN1LEJ9HUoKWHtf0gCj3JX4bVcD!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipO5bcb75K0vhvN1LEJ9HUoKWHtf0gCj3JX4bVcD%3Dw203-h360-k-no!7i2252!8i4000!4m5!3m4!1s0x47bf3feb1827d739:0x57f136df217d3c2e!8m2!3d50.8595785!4d6.7545921
MaxMustermann_ (2022-03-21 18:25:39+00:00): Relevant finde ich auch die Fleischtheke
HirschKauz (2022-03-21 21:38:11+00:00): Hui! Die Bilder von der Seite die wir nicht als Quelle benutzen dürfen sind echt beeindruckend ;-) Das lässt das Luftbild natürlich nicht erahnen. scheint überhaupt eine interessante Ecke zu sein da um den Markt herum. Mal sehen was das Motorrad meint wenn das Wetter passt :-) Grüße aus BM
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-26 15:55:06+00:00): Oops, sorry. Btw, what's the concrete slab used for? just the large traffic sign?
dgitto (2022-03-27 01:57:52+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
gio____1 (2022-03-21 22:08:45+00:00): Nice edit
yusufmert (2022-09-11 09:15:19+00:00): thanks
legofahrrad (2022-03-20 17:41:17+00:00): Hey,
please consider to save your edits more often to let your changesets be more local. This is helpful for other mappers to follow your changes.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
cdavila (2022-03-20 17:56:14+00:00): OK, I'll do it, but this kind of edits is difficult to reduce geographical area if you want to be minimally efficient.
SekeRob (2022-03-20 18:19:03+00:00): Hi,

your strive for minimal efficiency impairs the efficiency of all other mappers who get to have this change set in their local history view where it's going to be sitting near the top for days.

MTIA for your future consideration
cdavila (2022-03-20 18:27:54+00:00): I don't understand your complain. What is the problem having this changeset in the local history? Please explain. I think the real problem is having a wrong value in the database.
legofahrrad (2022-03-20 18:49:21+00:00): @cdavila I get your point and I appreciate your work that your fix the wrong characters. However, as mentioned by SekeRob, it is annoying having these giant boundaring boxes around your vicinity if you just want to check the changes that had been made in the neighbourhood.
SekeRob (2022-03-20 19:25:52+00:00): Think to have read that comma and point decimal are now acceptabele, the system understanding the 'locale'. Frankly, has anyone seen the use of a thousand separator? A quick peruse of wikis suggests the thousands sign is not used i.e. systemically hardly confusion on the decimal sign, but maybe memory is acting up.
cdavila (2022-03-21 06:44:24+00:00): For a person it's obvious that both 1.5 and 1,5 means one a half, but note these values are also processed by computers and they usually only "understand" one of them a decimal separator. And what about values like 2,.5 that I have also found?
mueschel (2022-03-22 09:53:07+00:00): Hier sind einige fremde Tags übrig geblieben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193189986
surveyor54 (2022-03-22 12:10:03+00:00): Oh,
danke für die Info, ist mir durchgerutscht.

Gruß
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
stst415 (2022-03-20 17:46:02+00:00): My description got cut off at the end.  Here's the FULL part with the questions: "I added Lone Ranger Rock in the Garden of the Gods section of Chatsworth, Los Angeles, including the hiking paths that lead up to it.  In the opening credits of the old TV show, this is where the Lone Ranger reared up his horse Silver.  Is "Historic Site" the best type of point to use for this?  Or is there something better for cinematic historical locations?  Would one mark a famous TV show or movie house or other such filming location with this "Historic Site" point or is there a way to mark the Area shape appropriately?
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-03-20 18:01:23+00:00): La zone de changement est surprenamment grande. J’espère ne pas avoir modifié quelque chose involontairement.
mayneframe (2022-03-20 18:10:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3091234

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3092227
opendcc (2022-03-20 18:15:59+00:00): Ui, die fehlenden Ebersberger Rettungspunkte sind offenbar montiert.
Rainero (2022-03-20 18:21:06+00:00): Dieses Schild hier sah relativ neu aus.
Grüße,
Rainer
limes11 (2022-05-20 06:10:00+00:00): Hi, 

are you familiar with the situation at the southern end of this track? You set access=no up to the bridge which basically disables routing over this bridge. Shouldn't the last 20 m be accessible? That would allow passage using the parallel path along the river.

Cheers, Limes
brainsail (2022-05-20 14:53:26+00:00): I'm not familiar with the southern end. Sorry if I caused confusion. I only found the gate at the northern end locked and assumed it's locked on both sides. Please correct the data if possible.
limes11 (2022-05-21 07:16:30+00:00): Ok, I did a minor change at the southern end and we keep the note open for others to verify the situation. Thanks!
MxxCon (2022-03-20 20:17:55+00:00): Hello.
You tagged Broadway as having a bike lane on the right, however satellite imagery shows that it's on the left.
Similarly, you tagged E10th as having a bike lane on the right, however satellite imagery shows that it's on the left side.
Could you please elaborate this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118706186
Rahim Akhter (2022-03-20 20:22:28+00:00): @mxxcon I apologize, this is just something street complete did when I was answering.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118706186
user_5359 (2022-03-22 21:02:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592585820. which type of business is this node?
osmviborg (2022-03-21 13:14:40+00:00): Læsetid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part 'building:part' er ifm. 3D tegning.
parsd51 (2022-03-25 12:37:11+00:00): Tak for rettelsen.

﻿Jeg kender allerede dokumentationen. Bygningerne hænger logisk, men ikke fysisk sammen, så pga. den logiske analogi har jeg mappet det sådan. ‘type’ havde jeg overset, så den vil jeg læse på.
mmis-berg (2022-09-18 13:31:04+00:00): Diese Änderung der Hausnummern ergibt keinen Sinn. Die gesamte Kleingartenanlage hat die Hausnummern 83-85. Die einzelnen Parzellen haben keine Hausnummern. Erst recht hat nicht die erste Laube die Hausnummer 85. Ich setze das wieder zurück.
Nielkrokodil (2022-04-06 16:07:56+00:00): Hallo Luzandro,

wurde dort ein neues Verkehrszeichen angebracht, dass es Rädern erlaubt, dort einzufahren? Bisher war es jedenfalls ein Einfahrt verboten OHNE Ausnahme für den Radverkehr (warum auch immer). 

Ich habe diese "unechte Einbahn" mit diesem Einbahn-Zipfel modelliert. Am langen Stück steht das auch als note dabei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23325695

Nur wegen einer Radroute würde ich das nicht in OSM "legalisieren".
Luzandro (2022-04-06 16:46:59+00:00): Die "legale" Beschilderung für Radfahrer ergibt halt leider oft keinen Sinn, so wie hier, wo das Schild für die Radroute direkt über dem Einfahrt verboten hängt. Wenns dir ein Anliegen ist, kannst du es auch gern wieder ändern, so viel schlechter wird das Routing damit auch nicht (am Neusiedlersee-Radweg ist mir so etwas auch erst kürzlich aufgefallen, dort müsstest du wahrscheinlich statt am Radweg im Schilfgürtel einen größeren Umweg über die Straße fahren...).
englu (2022-06-19 14:45:58+00:00): Czy na drodze 231103982 nadal są prace leśne?
SekeRob (2022-03-20 19:48:55+00:00): Watching what Osmose is going to flag on addresses along the way with the old notation as alt_name.
ivanbranco (2022-03-20 20:49:11+00:00): I'm going to spoil it for you: "No street with name "Via I Maggio" found around"

So addresses are to be fixed also
SekeRob (2022-03-20 22:40:39+00:00): Lol, someone s'been racing around the country doing that whom's standard comment i copied into mine JFF. I see the names being changed but not the addresses being update, classic.
SekeRob (2022-03-21 10:51:52+00:00): Diagnoses:

3 Flagged on my account as I mapped those.
5 Pinned on the Osmose Map for all to see
8 Corrected with the old Via I Maggio in the address.

Of course Primo does not care about changing A has consequences for B. Witnessed one doing this and 40 pins showing up in a main street.
confusedbuffalo (2022-04-13 17:00:48+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure what you were using to do the matching here, but something has gone a bit wrong.
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306487035 which has fhrs:id=1473267 but should link to https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1472655

There's something similar for a lot of objects in Cambridge, and not just in this changeset.

https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhodot/?lat=52.20582&lon=0.12772&zoom=13&layer=fhrs

A lot of the red dots are from issues like this.

Using OSMCha these seem to be the changesets from that session, which include the affected elements (I'm not sure if every element is mismatched or not).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118673427
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118565161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118565001
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118315177
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118314501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118276178
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118275973
Robert Whittaker (2022-04-13 18:41:22+00:00): Hmmm. I was using Greg's FHRS tool, with the automated JOSM links. So I think when I added those FHRS ID's they would have been correct.

If you go to https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhodot/?lat=52.13146&lon=0.18814&zoom=9&layer=fhrs and click on the Cambridge City polygon on the map, it will load a graph of matches against time. In March 2020, you'll see a drop in the green matches (which was caused by the Council switching to some new software and assigning new numbers -- see the 18th Feb item at https://ratings.food.gov.uk/Status ). It then bounces back, which would be me updating most of the entries. Then shortly afterwards the pink block of mismatches appears. This is presumably caused by the assigned IDs changing internally for some reason.

See https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/food_hygiene_rating_scheme_data for details of how the IDs are assigned by the FSA. I guess either Cambridge City Council's software as mixed up the IDs they assign, or the FSA has done the same with the mapping from the Council's IDs to the ones they issue. Either way, it's a pain for OSM if the ID's aren't stable, immutable, and non-reusable. I'll see if either Greg RS, or the FSA have any insight into what's happened here.
gregrs (2022-04-13 20:39:48+00:00): Looking at the stats collected by FHODOT, lots of FHRS IDs changed on 7th March as per the FSA announcement, and were gradually corrected until 21st March. Then on 28th March a lot of OSM objects (c. 300) went from being matched with the same postcode to matched with different postcodes.

I'm afraid I can't shed any more light on what could have caused this final change but it looks like the FHRS IDs were shuffled around rather than new, previously unused IDs being assigned, which seems odd. Hopefully the FSA might be able to help.
Robert Whittaker (2022-04-22 15:52:10+00:00): I've heard back from the FSA, who've been in touch with the City Council. Apparently, the Council made an error in their upload, which caused some of the ID's to be suhffled. They've now uploaded a corrected version to the FSA. Hopefully this means that the FSA data will revert to the IDs I added by tomorrow, and then the FHODOT tool will update too.
LidaCity (2022-05-10 06:19:13+00:00): согласно "РЕШЕНИЕ ГОМЕЛЬСКОГО ОБЛАСТНОГО ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОГО КОМИТЕТА 17 марта 2020 г. № 229" рег.номер 9/101937 - это автодорога Н4217,

в "ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ МИНИСТЕРСТВА ТРАНСПОРТА И КОММУНИКАЦИЙ
РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ 17 марта 2021 г. № 5" рег.номер 8/36507
и "ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ МИНИСТЕРСТВА ТРАНСПОРТА И КОММУНИКАЦИЙ
РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ 11 марта 2022 г. № 5" рег.номер 8/37723 - авторорога Р155 не существует

нашёл эту Р155 только яндекс-картах, но это очень сомнительный источник

Если укажете законодательный источник - буду очень рад
4004 (2022-05-12 10:58:51+00:00): слышал на уровне слухов, что мол переводят в разряд Р дорог, поэтому и фиксми. если нет документального подтверждения то можно откатить
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-21 07:47:44+00:00): Ciao Walter. Non credo sia corretto mettere il tag man_made=cairn direttamente su un nodo del percorso, perché significherebbe che questo è sul percorso stesso e non a uno dei suoi lati. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118708998
grawal (2022-03-21 13:33:41+00:00): Ciao Andrea, in realtà l'avevo collocato molto vicino ma non mi sembrava di averlo unito al percorso. Comunque ora l'ho spostato maggiormente.
user_5359 (2022-03-30 10:29:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592737673. What is the meaning of the tags
armatuur = Schreder Teceo
paal = beton
?
Has material = concrete the same meaning of paal=beton?
kasztelan111 (2022-03-29 16:17:04+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa się tutaj znalazła? Kojarzę, że skwer o takiej nazwie znajduje się na Muranowie.
syntex (2022-03-29 16:18:53+00:00): Wg PRNG są dwa, mnie to też zdziwiło
Rogoyski (2026-05-17 02:10:56+00:00): To chyba błąd w PRNG.
josmougn (2026-02-04 00:49:16+00:00): Salut
J'ai l'impression que ce tracé d'ancienne voie ferrée n'est pas bon. A supprimer ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042041729

Ce serait plutôt ce bout (à mettre dans la relation "Ligne ...") : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042041731
trial (2026-02-04 09:17:33+00:00): Oui, plutôt (le terrain a l'air d'avoir été remanié) d'ailleurs je vois que la branche vers Camaret n'est plus marquée comme voie ferrée désaffectée.
https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte?c=-4.544147121486547,48.26608039834986&z=18&l0=ORTHOIMAGERY.ORTHOPHOTOS::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1)&l1=ORTHOIMAGERY.ORTHOPHOTOS.1950-1965::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1)&l2=CADASTRALPARCELS.PARCELLAIRE_EXPRESS::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1)&permalink=yes

Il devait y avoir deux rails au niveau de la gare (pas sûr).
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-07 03:58:48+00:00): What you meant by surface=green at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042042695/history ?

Is it just grass?
pitfire (2022-03-21 06:38:29+00:00): Den Überweg kannst Du zwar löschen, bringt aber nichts. Jeder der mit Street Complete hier vorbei kommt wird den erneut setzen!
pitfire (2022-03-21 11:27:39+00:00): Hab jetzt die, erneut auftauchenden Fragesymbole in StreetComplete einmal durchgespielt. Jetzt sollte hier Ruhe sein.
olo81 (2022-08-16 12:49:02+00:00): zdublowane nazwy do poprawy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042053155
okoliczne nazwy też do poprawy, zbiorniki według PRNG to "Grudek" i "Wydra" jeśli są dodatkowe nazwy lokalne dajemy do tagu loc_name
olo81 (2022-08-16 12:49:22+00:00): *Gródek
Denis_Helfer (2022-12-04 09:27:00+00:00): Bonjour,
merci de mettre les n° de voie dans la clé ref et pas dans le nom.
Denis_Helfer (2022-12-04 09:26:26+00:00): Bonjour,
merci de mettre les n° de voie dans la clé ref et pas dans le nom.
HellMap (2023-01-21 13:06:09+00:00): Hey!

Do you remember - was this road/track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134028175 blocked by this fence https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042044805 ? Or was there something else here not on aerial?
UrSuS (2023-01-21 13:20:33+00:00): I this I was set as creator when I split fence, the original creator probably is here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153970456
HellMap (2023-01-21 13:35:31+00:00): I assumed you split the fence because you were surveying and adjusting something. I guess you only split the fence for the multipolygon. I'll assume the fence is wrong and aerial is newer. Thanks.
user_5359 (2022-03-22 20:56:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116973817. I am pretty sure, that you mean colour instead of colo. BurbDid you mean building or roof colour?
janolezab (2022-03-22 21:02:12+00:00): Yes, I did indeed mean "colour" and corrected it now. Thanks for noticing.
PT-53 (2022-03-21 08:27:25+00:00): Hallo Chris,
warum stufst Du die Zufahrt zu den Tennisplätzen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61292068/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799006022/history
 von service auf track herunter?
Fragende Grüße
hatul (2022-04-03 21:58:40+00:00): שברת את שביל ישראל בכניסה לחניה. כדאי להיזהר.
JochenOSM (2022-03-21 12:05:46+00:00): Hallo 17martin10, der Linienzug ist offenbar nicht geschlossen, somit keine Fläche sondern nur eine Linie. Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
mariotomo (2023-05-19 07:47:22+00:00): fixed in changeset:136285993
GeoBoris (2022-03-27 22:09:22+00:00): Je mehr ich von Deinen Changes ansehe, desto mehr graut mir.... Gut erfasste Gebiete mit Gebäuden aus der Katasterkarte werden von Dir leider durch nachmalen mittels Luftbild zerstört!
map per (2022-03-27 09:17:05+00:00): Hallo Wuermtalkartograf,

ist dieser Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224411425) wirklich eine Brücke? 
Oder war das ein Mappingfehler?

Viele Grüße
map per
ivanbranco (2022-03-21 13:52:17+00:00): Hi AneteK,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6845090482

I saw that this and many other nodes in this area (e.g "Riepiņas #") are tagged as place=unknown. What do they represent?
amuppidi (2022-03-20 23:33:08+00:00): Fixed placement of Pinebrook Road near Dulles West Blvd. Added sidewalks and footpaths along Dulles west blvd.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:51:22+00:00): Buildings should not be tagged as offices
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:53:50+00:00): Why are cart paths tagged as walking paths?
ralley (2022-03-21 17:51:03+00:00): You have tagged this layer=-1, I don't think it is underground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118713809
Hayden Thorn (2022-03-21 20:59:49+00:00): My bad, fixed.
avinet_ua (2022-03-23 16:38:08+00:00): Revert it back
avinet_ua (2022-03-23 16:41:18+00:00): you deleted a lot of work!
Frans S (2022-04-04 08:59:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points: Be more precise. You map buildings rather oversized and overlap nearby buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118714191
Mannivu (2022-04-09 10:09:16+00:00): Those names are not wrong. Please, revert your edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118714489
DressyPear4 (2022-03-21 16:28:31+00:00): Olá, não crie edições fictíceas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118714544
Glassman (2022-03-21 21:08:54+00:00): #TIP: It would be good to add the gate. To add a gate just place a node on the road where the gate is located. Then just search for gate to add the right type of gate.

Regarding marking the road as private. If the road is posted with no trespassing then either access=no or access=private is appropriate. If it's not posted then I usually don't limit access. That why friends and relatives can use their gps to route to their house. Let me know if you have questions or need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118715213
Glassman (2022-03-21 14:03:04+00:00): Can you fix the lane count where you removed the motorway_link?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118715371
user4816003805 (2022-03-22 17:01:02+00:00): Looks good.
Supaplex (2022-03-21 05:27:50+00:00): 這應該還沒蓋好吧?如果蓋好才改成住宅區，還是空著則用landuse=brownfield
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118715540
Kodan (2022-03-23 13:31:22+00:00): 你是當地人嗎? 還是看航照和街景在判斷? 這塊地的建物的主結構都快蓋好了,連對面的地圍起圍把大樹都砍了,現在圍牆都拆了,也準備動工了.
想改回去請便,等蓋好了,符合你判斷的標準再麻煩你修圖.
Supaplex (2022-03-24 09:44:12+00:00): 我這邊有預售屋資訊，那就改成施工中