piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nw520 (2020-05-06 13:15:43+00:00): Hallo Dirk Feld, mit diesem Änderungssatz, zusammen mit dem Änderungssatz 77283810, hast du aus einem Wohngebiet (=Fläche, w99234200) ein Untergrundkabel (=Linie) gemacht. War das so beabsichtigt? Gleiches Problem bei dem "Wald" (=Fläche, w98595800) der zu einer Baumreihe (=Linie) wurde. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das Fehler waren und habe die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Sollte das bewusst gewesen sein, so kommentiere bitte hier in der Diskussion.
eggie (2019-11-09 18:38:15+00:00): Please comment your edit properly.. f i "added hotel".
Greetz,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 23:51:41+00:00): De geplaatste borden C1 geven duidelijk aan dat daar geen ander verkeer in mag rijden.
Met het opknippen van de weg zijn wederom 17 routerelaties beschadigd.

Reverted met mijn changeset 76857052
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Glassman (2019-11-09 19:54:59+00:00): Tip: adding the curb type at each intersection helps pedistrian routes determine if the curb is suitable for wheelchair and others with limited mobility get onto the crosswalk. At the node between the sidewalk and crosswalk indicate kerb=raised/lowered/flush. (We use British English since OSM got its start in England so that's why curb is spelled weird)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76851520
sluggie2 (2019-11-09 20:55:59+00:00): Ok I will check the curb type next time I go by. Thanks for the tip!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76851520
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Glassman (2019-11-09 19:55:16+00:00): Nice edits!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76852336
XnL (2020-01-29 04:29:56+00:00): Номер дома не записывается в название
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76852390
XnL (2020-01-29 04:28:58+00:00): Это вы отмечаете люки? Или в краснодаре на каждые несколько метров стоят колодцы? Если первое, то man_made=manhole
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76852459
DressyPear4 (2019-11-10 03:38:29+00:00): Mais atenção ao enviar edições em massa, você colocou tag highway=tertiary nos pontos da via, e nem todas elas são terciárias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76853058
CjMalone (2019-11-09 20:17:09+00:00): Well... this needs reverting
CjMalone (2019-11-09 20:19:43+00:00): Reverted in 76853499
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
corfede (2019-11-11 17:32:21+00:00): Ciao Sandro, cosa significa off-limits? Non esistono più, o sono solo inaccessibili? In quest'ultimo caso si potrebbe semplicemente aggiungere un access=private invece che cancellarli? Ciao e grazie, Federico.
Sandro Boccia (2019-11-11 18:19:14+00:00): Ciao Fede. Villa Elvira è una proprietà privata e da un po' di mesi hanno iniziato lavori di ristrutturazione di tutta la villa e sbarrato definitivamente gli accessi alle bici. Molti sentieri erano ricavati nel terreno, quindi sicuramente li elimineranno e/o modificheranno. C'erano single track e passaggi sui muretti. Sandro
skquinn (2019-11-10 18:59:14+00:00): What do the Walmart stores in Indiana have to do with a speed limit adjustment in Texas?
Glassman (2019-11-09 23:22:55+00:00): The fixme for the charger station is good, but because we don't have a tag for under construction it will appear as live. We do tag buildings and highways under construction using highway=construction + highway=residential as an example. The renders will display the road as under construction. 

You could try amenity=construction + construction=charging_station. Leave the fixme as it appears in some of the quality tools.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76853471
Carnildo (2019-11-17 04:07:49+00:00): I'd go with a "lifecycle prefix" of "construction:".  I'm not aware of any maps that will draw it, but QA tools should flag it for updating after a while.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Stereo (2020-04-24 13:56:15+00:00): Hi GeWaLu! I can't find any reference to '9 rue de la Station' for the train station in Dommeldange, and the other side of the street has uneven numbers too. Did you see a house number on the building? Happy mapping! Guillaume
GeWaLu (2020-04-24 17:45:54+00:00): If I remember well, I found this 9 either on the right side of the building or in the window of the integrated streetwork office. Thanks for the hint - you are right, this numbering is strange and may be a mistake - I'll re-check in a few days - the next time I'll pass at the station.
GeWaLu (2020-04-25 15:05:11+00:00): I can confirm the 9. It is twice present: On the right door frame as normal blue housenumber sign and as location info on the postbox no54 on the left side of the building - with street name.
Stereo (2020-04-27 15:50:47+00:00): Hah! Crazy. I've re-added it to the building then. Thank you very much.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-09 23:40:24+00:00): I changed the routing of the Lyke Wake Walk https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996318 west instead of east from the Lyke Wake Walk Stone https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1651183163 in order to accommodate another inscribed stone https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6960819404 as a marker.  IF this is wrong, please let me know!
NSiecw (2019-11-10 01:07:28+00:00): Parlour was the correct spelling of this business name.
Alan Bragg (2019-11-30 13:25:13+00:00): Nice change. Keeping the map up to date.
eggie (2019-11-09 22:03:52+00:00): Dag Sarremans.. Een trottoir dat direct langs de hoofdrijbaan loopt wordt niet apart gemapt in OSM. 
Het zou immers niet routeren, want probeer maar eens de weg over te steken met een routeplanner.

Je neemt dan over dat gedeelte de tagging op in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=both in dit geval.
Mogelijkheden zijn sidewalk=left / right /both /none
MVG,
Eggie
Sarremans (2019-11-09 22:12:49+00:00): oke
eggie (2019-11-09 22:26:27+00:00): De routering voor voetgangers loopt meestal via de hoofdrijbanen. Hier is het helemaal lastig om het goed te doen omdat er deels ook nog een stukje fietspad ingetekend is. Dan wordt zo'n trottoir weer opgenomen in dat fietspad. De meeste kaarten laten het effect niet zien, maar ze zijn er wel.
geri-oc (2019-12-28 14:58:32+00:00): Ich finde deine Änderungen nicht richtig.
image=* ist immer noch ein Schlüssel. Du kannst gern wikimedia_commons=* ergänzen aber nicht gültige Schlüssel löschen. Gruß Gerd
pyrog (2019-12-28 15:02:03+00:00): Does image="File:Brandhaus in Oberhäslich.jpg" is fine for you ?
pyrog (2019-12-28 15:03:22+00:00): image=* + wikimedia_commons=* is a bit redondant ;-)
geri-oc (2019-12-28 15:38:31+00:00): Nein - ich verwende selbst image=* + wikimedia_commons=* für Kategorien. Und einige Webseiten werten nach alten Schlüsseln image= * aus,
Genauso z.B. wie website=* oder contact:website=* - warum nicht beides ermöglichen?
pyrog (2019-12-28 15:48:40+00:00): I agree if wikimedia_commons key contain a category :-)

I suggest to use :
image="File:Brandhaus in Oberhäslich.jpg"

instead of :
image="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brandhaus_in_Oberh%C3%A4slich.jpg"

The map of Historical objects handle it, and since late 2019, even www.openstreatmap.org

Tchüss
Violaine_Do (2019-11-19 03:04:35+00:00): hello,
tu as fait beaucoup de modifications dans ce changeset. Notamment transformer des tags de routes structurantes et du residentiel en service (parmis tout un tas d'autres détaillées par mail). Je te remercie de ta contribution. Néanmoins comme tu le sais ce travail fait partie d'un import et d'une collaboration avec le SAU ou l'IGN local. Ainsi la structuration des routes est issue d'une réflexion locale. Les conclusions sont dans le wiki d'OSM Polynésie française. J'ai également noté que tu avais ajouté source=SAU sur toutes les données du SAU importées. Nous avions fait le choix de ne mettre l'info que sur le changeset, pour éviter de parasiter la base et aussi car ces sources ne veulent plus rien dire dès qu'une personne modifie l'objet. Pourrais 1 tu expliquer ta démarche 2 la prochaine fois contacter les contribuerus locaux avant de faire de tels changements 3 corriger tes erreurs? Merci par avance de ta compréhension.
ËdzëronK (2019-11-21 18:25:07+00:00): Bonjour,
"Ainsi la structuration des routes est issue d'une réflexion locale."
Je pense que tu parle des highway=road, étant déprécier, j'ai voulu changer leur état en ce qui était le plus probable.

"J'ai également noté que tu avais ajouté source=SAU sur toutes les données du SAU importées."

C'était assez facile de le rajouté avec le validator de josm, les imprort massife du cadastre en france étant aussi en chaine du type "cadastre-dgi-fr source : Direction Générale des Impôts - Cadastre. Mise à jour : 2010" sur tous les objet importés, il m'a semblé bon de le faire.
Violaine_Do (2019-11-21 18:50:21+00:00): hello.

Je ne parle pas de la spécifications des highway=road. Je parle des changements de types , par exemple des routes residential passées en service, des routes tertiary passées en secondary. Ou encore des tags smoothness qui ont disparu, des tags surface qui sont passé de unpaved en paved. Vu les sources que tu utilises, j'ai du mal à savoir comment tu peux savoir le changement de surface. Es tu sur le terrain? Pour voir le détail de tes modifications tu peux aller sur osmcha. https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76855362?aoi=54dd4761-4db2-4c68-b96e-9683703c4b65

Ensuite pour la question de la source je t'invite à prendre connaissance du wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source). Depuis quelques années on peut ajouter ce tag au changeset, il est recommandé (sur ce wiki) de ne pas supprimer tous les tags source qui sont déjà dans la base. Mais on ne conseille pas l'inverse. J'ai pas le temps de retrouver la discussion qui expliquait ça en détail. Dans les grandes lignes : en faisant ca tu surcharges la base, et tu ajoutes une information figée qui ne l'est pas. Dans le futur ce tag risque de rester alors que la source aura changé. Également certains bâtiments existaient déjà dans OSM on n'a fait qu'une mise à jour. Ainsi ce ne sont que mes modifications qui ont cette source. 

Comme tes changeset sont énormes et mixent plusieurs erreurs difficiles à régler une a une (tu as fait 15 changeset sur la zone! dont plsieurs avec plus de 2000 modif ou suppressions), je te propose de les reverter. Ces erreurs que je te mentionne sont les plus visibles mais on a aussi des ponts piétons qui ont sauté, des mauvais choix de suppression, etc. 

C'est dommage car si tu avais fait des plus petits changeset on aurait pu mieux gérer ça, notamment garder les bonnes choses que tu avais faites..

A te lire,
Violaine
kartonage (2019-11-10 03:55:31+00:00): Hallo alpha_14,

du setzt immer noch deine überdimensionalen Massenänderungen im Raum Berlin/Brandenburg fort. Du änderst relativ logikfrei bestimmte Namen in Großbuchstaben und andere in Kleinbuchstaben. Was mir dabei auffällt ist, dass sich die Vorgehensweise zu den letzten Malen schon wieder geändert hat. Was ist der Sinn dahinter? 

Sind das automatische Änderungen, warst du vor Ort?

Eine Reihe von Mitwirkenden haben dich schon längst versucht zu erreichen: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3266826

Es wäre an der Zeit mal zu antworten.
eggie (2019-11-09 22:05:56+00:00): Voor andere mappers is het duidelijker als je concreet commentaar toevoegt en in dit geval in het Engels.
Bijgewerkt zegt niets.
gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-09 22:38:38+00:00): Maar dat is niet wat je tags inhouden. Je verandert de wegklasse van doorgaande weg in de wijk in residential.
eggie (2019-11-09 22:39:50+00:00): Waarom?
eggie (2019-11-09 22:48:22+00:00): Ik pas wat aan.. je kunt het als voorbeeld gebruiken.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-09 22:51:21+00:00): Weer teruggetagd naar unclassified.. stoep verwijderd. De tags zitten in de hoofdrijbaan.
Chris Fleming (2019-11-11 13:41:10+00:00): Hi thanks for this, I see that you requested a review. Overall the shop and the tagging look great. 

It would be good to separate the shop for the car par park though.

Cheers
Chris
xspot (2019-11-20 11:03:03+00:00): Hi Chris, 
Thanks for the review. I have added the parking lot around the shop  in #77317905. 
Would highly appreciate a review of that as well. Thanks 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77317905
Chris Fleming (2019-11-20 21:49:19+00:00): Thanks that looks great!
eggie (2019-11-09 22:35:36+00:00): (her)startende mappers worden gevolgd in hun edits. Uiteraard ook om te helpen.
Om te voorkomen dat je een rij bezoekers krijgt voor dit zwembad hoort er toegevoegd te worden access=private
eggie (2019-11-10 07:55:27+00:00): access=private toegevoegd
Carnildo (2019-11-17 05:36:08+00:00): The "pedestrian access" question is about whether it's *legal* for pedestrians to use the road, not if it's safe.  If there isn't a "no pedestrians" sign, pedestrian access is legal.
Thibaultmol (2019-11-09 22:41:01+00:00): Overview page of the project:
https://ipon-nv.be/projecten/ruiselede-poekestraat-fase-1
Thibaultmol (2019-11-09 22:41:30+00:00): I used my gpx data of the area as well to make this edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Thibaultmol/traces/3145727
motogs (2019-11-09 22:49:53+00:00): This changeset description should say "Added houses and other buildings" instead of what it does say.
Leo Slager (2019-11-30 15:17:50+00:00): Dag Famlam,
"maxheight=3.5 m" komt als foutje bovendrijven in OSM Inspector.
3.5 (zonder m) is de juiste notatie.
Famlam (2019-11-30 15:45:19+00:00): Dag Leo,
Dankjewel voor je bericht! 
Om eerlijk te zijn, ik heb de eenheid altijd juist toegevoegd omdat dat van de wiki mag (en in mijn ogen helderder is, zelfs al is de meter de standaardeenheid voor deze tag). Best vreemd dus dat OSM inspector daarover klaagt. Gaat dit binnenkort veranderen, bij jouw weten?
Leo Slager (2019-11-30 15:49:47+00:00): Soms zijn die jongens wel eens strenger in de leer als dat wenselijk is.
Mijns inziens is er immers niets op tegen om de m hier wel toe te voegen.
abakus_uploader (2019-11-09 23:38:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hjart (2019-11-09 23:34:20+00:00): Why are you adding names in german to objects in Denmark?
Molker (2019-11-10 13:23:01+00:00): Hello Hjart, I can tell you why. I have more than one reason. 
1. I’m adding German names to all historical constructions which have not been finished concerning the German Reichsautobahn. 
2. This was a motorway initiated by the Germans and were originally called Strecke 145 during the construction. 
3. I don’t know the official Danish name for that strip by the time being constructed. 
Have a nice afternoon, Volker
osmviborg (2019-11-10 15:44:01+00:00): This is a  better place to put things like that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
Dave Venables (2019-11-10 08:30:54+00:00): The footbridge was demolished in April 2019 and a replacement is under construction. New bridge and path will be in a slightly different position. 
There is no pedestrian route over the A52 here. Paths and bridge should be removed.
hambi-uk (2019-11-10 11:27:59+00:00): Hi Dave. If you haven't done so I will delete the bridge then. Last time I went along the A52 it was there and I there is an organised annual hike in January that thinks its going across the bridge (the organisers are from Chaddesden so I assumed they would be aware of any changes).
Dave Venables (2019-11-10 11:37:17+00:00): The Highfield Lane - Chequers Road bridge is open https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181539687. The Meadow Lane one was closed in April 2019 and demolished in May 2019. New bridge due to open in "spring 2020" major construction work in progress either side of the A52 ready for the bridge next year.
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/derby-news/your-questions-answered-a52-footbridge-2789367
Warin61 (2019-11-14 05:38:08+00:00): Hi,
The relation multipolygons outer way has the same tag as the relation... this is not good.

As a way all the interior will be a 'reef' (in this case as it is tagged as a reef). 

As a relation there is an interior that would not be a reef... 

So which is it? Either remove the tags on the outer way to make a reef with a hole inside using the relation

Or

Delete the relation to leave a simple area as a reef. 

Ok?
aquarix (2019-11-10 02:22:16+00:00): Hello RudolpheDeer,
you changed a lot of embassies in recent time. That's OK in principle.
But you should not edit them over more than one continent. For the sake of clarity, I would group these changes by country or capital.
Additionally you deleted a couple of items where it is not clear to me if this was done in error or with good cause.
As you only specified Bing as your source I assume you haven't checked further before committing your changes.
Please explain your sources.
Regards aquarix
volkertransalp (2019-11-09 23:59:32+00:00): Haus Nr.5 war gemeint
ma-rt-in (2019-11-10 00:02:31+00:00): Hallo,
bitte setzte die Straße vollständig in den Ursprungs zustand zurück und nicht nur halb. Schau dir die Chroniken dafür am besten an.
vg
mariotomo (2019-12-05 16:39:38+00:00): hey, aren't you able to agree on this?
what does your wiki say?
muralito (2019-12-05 17:50:12+00:00): Not for now. It's a pity.

There is no local wiki for this, the "global" wiki says building is is for tagging each bulding, and place=city_block to tag city blocks.

The reason the other user is tagging as building is for rendering them in openstreetmap.org tiles.
mariotomo (2019-12-05 18:26:25+00:00): there's one point I don't get, in your area: why so many landuse=residential within landuse=residential?  is it according to some guidelines?  or again just for rendering purposes?
(qué opinas español, o inglés?)
OttawaHiking (2019-11-11 21:04:13+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your first contributions! Please be sure to connect new roads to the existing road network.
j03lar50n (2019-11-12 02:43:42+00:00): Hey GallonWater/Tom ...stop vandalizing!
j03lar50n (2019-11-12 02:45:50+00:00): I've reported this user
wireguy (2019-11-10 13:32:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  The driveway looks good, but you don't need to add tags that are already  the default, like oneway=no, covered=no, etc.   Keep up the good work!
Carnildo (2019-11-17 07:42:20+00:00): Whose park is that?  It's not one of the ones on the city's list.
viloan (2019-11-10 03:10:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-11-10 16:10:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! the tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag. See https://www.osm.org/way/743764369
HughesMDflyer4 (2019-11-10 19:49:19+00:00): Oops, didn't actually mean for that tag to be added at all. Thanks for the heads up.
sskalyan (2019-12-28 11:22:21+00:00): Hi,

Please add road geometry according to the ground reality, I have modified your edits which are creating impossible sharp turns. 

Regards,
Kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76859357
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
sskalyan (2019-12-28 10:58:42+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759131755 reverted directions to this segment. This is an entry/exit ans shoould be bidirectional. 

Thanks,
kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76859497
sskalyan (2019-12-28 11:13:50+00:00): *and should
5m4u9 (2019-11-11 06:12:13+00:00): pienso que añadir place a landuses residenciales no es la mejor práctica, pienso que debería solo añadirse a nodos para evitar duplicidad (mala práctica), y también porque añadir place a un área es asumir que ésa área es el lugar y fuera de eso no, en algunos casos de lugares dispersos no es real este concepto
freebeer (2019-11-10 21:26:24+00:00): you have been repeatedly asked to use meaningful and non-gibberish changeset comments, and you have received several DWG blocks for failing to do so.

yet you continue to make further map edits without explaining what you have done.  your latest changes include a meaningless `edits' here, and
y662y 
vqegf 
reGGGA 
f8y6 
txkylf,hy 
ygbrag 
fbDfb 
htjh 
vad 
[an off-topic sensible description]
 ygcftrfff8f8fyaw98fyw8ru33hyrhw3ugttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttfisufhruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
(which caused another mapper to comment that you should take notice of)
qfeq 
fr3r 
4w5t5t 
dvvwgffv 
dfvrbvrefg 
hj bh 
fdrftgh 
jhh 

and that is all on the first page of your history.

i take it you have no interest in helping your fellow mappers understand what you are trying to do.