piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-02-09 07:58:08+00:00): Hallo Hauke, 
da muß ich Dir entschieden widersprechen: Path wird nicht nur für Trampelpfade etc. verwendet, sondern auch z.B. für kombinierte Geh- und Radwege mit Verkehrszeichen # 240 / # 241
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Grüße
hauke-stieler (2021-02-09 11:39:50+00:00): Hi,
das tagging ist ja auch nicht direkt falsch nur halt allgemeiner als möglich. So wie building=yes nicht falsch ist, aber meist allgemeiner als nötig.

Im Artikel zu path wird ja auch immer gesagt, dass es ein universaler und allgemeiner tag für alle möglichen nicht-motorisierten Wege ist. Persönlich finde ich es bei Fuß-&Radwegen ok, wenn wirklich 50% des Weges für Fußgänger und 50% des Weges für Radfahrer vorgesehen ist.

Da wir hier aber ja wissen, dass die primäre Funktion dieser Wege für Fußgänger bestimmt ist (keine "Rad Frei"-zeichen, Wegemarkierungen oder ähnliches vorhanden), wäre hier highway=footway ein genauerer tag. Dadurch ist zum einen die primäre Nutzungsart des Weges klar und zum anderen implizit eben auch die Berechtigung für Radfahrer.

Im path und footway Artikel ist neben der erkennbaren "bauliche Gestaltung" von "Widmung" die Rede, was nicht zwangsläufig heißen muss, dass immer ein Verkehrszeichen vorhanden sein muss.

Daher: Der tag highway=footway ist hier einfach genauer und simpler, als highway=path + foot=... + bicycle=... oder ähnliches.

Grüße
Hauke
PT-53 (2021-02-09 11:49:55+00:00): highway=footway schließt automatisch Fahrradfahrer von der Nutzung dieser Wege (per Navi)  aus.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
Futur3r (2021-02-08 18:49:37+00:00): Salut,
J'ai vu que le tag était shop=alcohol sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dalcohol.

Les addr:* peuvent être en contact:*, en plus le batiment à déjà une adresse.

A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98924107
marc__marc (2021-04-03 10:17:16+00:00): Bonjour,
si vous connaissez même très vaguement sa surface, n'hésitez pas à en faire une surface, c'est netement plus utilisable qu'un simple noeud pour la majorité des outils (je ne la vois ni sur le cadastre ni sur l'imagerie sat, j'imagine donc que vous avez une autre source que celle déclarée)
Cordialement,
Marc
habi (2021-02-11 11:17:17+00:00): You've added "Maan Brothers Dairy & Poultry Farm Services=Toba Pir Mehal Road" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450057493 in this changeset.
This is wrong and I removed it with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99102239
habi (2021-02-11 11:21:50+00:00): I also deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12290781 since it only contained said way.
habi (2021-02-11 11:31:13+00:00): Also in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99103424 I changed some tags of the POI of the poultry farm and added some buildings.
habi (2021-02-11 11:00:39+00:00): Ciao moserhe4
Ich hab' den Tippfehler in 'genuss' zu 'genus' korrigiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99101261

Gruss aus der Schweiz,
Habi

Ich kam via http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm hier vorbei...
habi (2021-02-11 11:00:28+00:00): Ciao moserhe4
Ich hab' den Tippfehler in 'genuss' zu 'genus' korrigiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99101261

Gruss aus der Schweiz,
Habi

Ich kam via http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm hier vorbei...
iccaldwell (2021-02-15 18:20:43+00:00): This area is a 20mph Zone and is a Home Zone. The wiki says should be mapped as a living street which it was before your edit.
bigfatfrog67 (2021-02-17 17:27:57+00:00): Yes, been there today and you're right although no way did I feel as a pedestrian that I had equal rights to cars! I'll revert it back.
eggie (2021-02-08 20:52:20+00:00): Beste deniz... Wat voegt dit toe. Er is toch hier een fietspad.
Je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98925143
MVG
eggie
deniz005 (2021-02-14 07:39:51+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Ik ben net begonnen te mappen met StreetComplete. Mijn vader DLMax helpt me wel en ik vraag hem ook wel om hulp. 
Hier had ik niet in de gaten dat er ook al een fietspad naast was gemaakt dat los van de weg lag.
Zou je deze edit kunnen reverten?

Dankjewel alvast!
Groetjes,
Deniz005
eggie (2021-02-14 07:45:55+00:00): Dag Deniz... Het is geen ramp... 

Je toevoeging verwijder ik wel. Vooral plezier met StreetComplete.
Streetcomplete is niet helemaal foutloos. 

In  Add whether there are cycleways zit een BUG die de uitzondering voor fietsers op eenrichtingsverkeer verwijderd. 

https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/2310 

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-02-14 07:52:05+00:00): bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd ipv cycleway:right = no
Gr eggie
iWowik (2021-02-09 10:12:19+00:00): День добрый!
Вы вносите много адресов домиков.
Обычно эту информацию не совсем просто найти, где вы ее берете?

К тому же вы при этом делаете много ошибок. Не соблюдаете принятый порядок написание addr:housenumber домов, а именно способ написание буквы в номере.

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки за вами править или откатывать
Salmonleg (2021-02-09 10:38:06+00:00): WIP

Дані на момент реєєстрації ділянки з публічної кадастрової карти –> в половині з них попадається щось схоже на адрес -> викинути все дивне і підозріле, решту вручну поставити на будівлю яка найбільше схожа на будинок за максаром на території кадастрової ділянки -> додати решту адресів по вулиці де к-ть ділянок співпадає з послідовністтю нумерації
iWowik (2021-02-09 13:25:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8405870303
5-a - это ошибка
iWowik (2021-02-09 13:31:06+00:00): И ошибок под сотню.

Описание принятого формата:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#.D0.91.D1.83.D0.B4.D1.96.D0.B2.D0.BB.D1.96
Salmonleg (2021-02-09 14:02:59+00:00): Дякую за нагадування, я знайомий з прийнятим форматуванням і виправляю його по мірі перенесення адрес на геометрію будівель
joost schouppe (2022-03-25 17:42:50+00:00): Hi felixi,
Is this really an official camper site? It looks more like a parking that is used de facto as a place to spend the night
JayTurnr (2021-02-08 18:42:56+00:00): Oops! There are clearly two localities in Kent called Breach. My bad. I hate large changesets like this.
mueschel (2021-02-11 14:12:31+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, the key 'rwe' seems to be a mistake
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/540430227
dvdhoven (2021-02-11 14:36:23+00:00): Hi,

Yes, a mistake
Thanks a lot, I have corrected it

Regards,
Dick van den Hoven
jmty8 (2021-06-02 13:23:02+00:00): Hello. Sorry for bothering you. Don't you know if a car could pass here on Ciclabile Opera Mirasole? https://sites.mapbox.com/id-internal/#background=EsriWorldImageryClarity&disable_features=boundaries&feedback_id=ch-450122610-450122612&id=w324885921&map=19.36/45.38843/9.20742
Jorisbo (2021-02-14 11:07:54+00:00): Hi Stereo, a couple of days ago you added oneway=yes to a small part of route de beaufort (id 363709735) connecting to route de Dillingen. Is this correct? Mapillary shows roadworks, but it seems unlikely this short piece has become oneway. Kind regards, Joris
Puxan (2021-02-09 11:04:08+00:00): Muy bien, No olvides escuadrar los edificios que se puedan escuadrar.  Sigue mapeando,    Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98926547
Cascafico (2021-02-08 19:56:44+00:00): Da dove hai tratto i nomi?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98926612
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-08 20:52:03+00:00): Sono appesi i segnali sul recinto dei laghetti
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98926612
reedyn (2021-02-16 13:47:14+00:00): Hi. I'm wondering why you deleted all those tree nodes?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree
reedyn (2021-02-16 13:47:42+00:00): If it was a mistake we can just revert it.
Trevor_1 (2022-07-30 15:55:11+00:00): Hello. Why did you delete the zip codes on these roads, but not the other Tiger tags?
mariotomo (2021-02-08 19:40:11+00:00): hola Didiel.  the habrás enterado que cuando contribuyes con StreetComplete es el programa que pone el comentario al conjunto de cambios, y produce textos útiles como "Add building types", "Add wheelchair access to public transport platforms", "Determine bus/tram stop names".  nota que estos comentarios empiezan con un verbo e individuan un objeto.  cuando lo haces manualmente, podrías seguir el ejemplo del software, te parece?
PerryStreeter (2021-02-08 19:24:35+00:00): Changed "Fleak Water" to "Flesk Water" but further changes may be necessary to update label(s) displayed on maps.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-11 23:55:52+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this.
You'e only changed the name, and that seems fine. I don't have any local knowledge, but I'm presuming you do and that's why you've changed it. This stream is mapped in several parts, there are sections running north west from here still called "Fleak Water", so do change them too if that name is incorrect.
PerryStreeter (2021-02-12 00:47:08+00:00): Apparently I am the "confused" one (LOL). As a newbie, I did not realize that one body of water might have multiple sections. Searched for and just changed those. Thanks!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-12 09:07:01+00:00): Ha, nice one.
Often single things are broken into several parts on OSM, either because different parts have different properties (such as width, or number of lanes on a road) or just to break things into manageable parts.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-09 17:08:12+00:00): Please don't add descriptive labels, especially  "Development" and "Kwun Tong". At most I would agree with Hiu Ming Street and Hiu Kwong Street PRH, however this is still not the housing estate's name.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-09 17:08:53+00:00): Move the PWP item name to `description:zh=` & `description:en=`, or some other tag
kartonage (2021-02-08 19:40:40+00:00): My bad. Huge changeset not intended. Changes are not related to each other. The change in Portugal adds a member to Estrada Nacional 16.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-09 22:50:48+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap
Just checking whether you've surveyed this yourself (it looks like it as it seems you used a gpx file) or whether it was copied from OS Maps, just because your comment isn't quite clear about that.
Also on the southern one of the paths you've added, there's a section where you've put it along the field boundary, which makes it seem like it's going through a hedge! I assume it actually goes one side or the other, so it would be great if you were able to fix that. Or let me know and I should be able to fix it.
felipeeugenio (2021-02-09 00:10:35+00:00): Hello again. Please take into consideration the actual definitions of the tags you are using here. There is no chance that an actual footway is what is on terrain here, assuming that something is actually on terrain here. nothing is viewable from the satellite photos.

if you are certain that no motor vehicle can enter a route, path should be, most likely, the tag used and not track.
felipeeugenio (2021-02-09 13:03:37+00:00): Hello. I think you are having a confusion regarding what is drawable and what´s not in OSM. If a person walks, bikes or drive creating a strava trace, doesn´t means at all that a real road, path or highway is present in terrain.
Worrying is that with >6k editions, you should know better.
The drawing you made in the north of Chile some years ago were almost all deleted because there were not real.
Besides, as well as these actual drawings, there were all very poorly drawn, with very simple modulations that were by no means what was actually happening on terrain.
Please refrain of trespassing strava traces to OSM without proper investigation and verification through satellite imagery.
Any concern you may have regarding the treat that your editions has been having in Chile you might consult joining the Chilean community in Telegram.

regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98928064
Willem Altes (2021-02-08 20:01:37+00:00): Beste Tilia_J,
Bij Weg: 4757352 staat er bij de grens van het gebied rond Het Leesten een bord C14 (fietsverbod) of een populaire variant ervan met fietser erop (https://www.rosa-zaanstad.nl/web/wp-content/uploads/320E8325-7197-4E62-A55C-8071BCD29EE1.jpeg). Het grootste deel is goed getagged, maar het gebied rond Het Leesten niet.
Ik ben er zaterdag langsgefietst.
Met vriendelijke groet, Willem Altes
Willem Altes (2021-02-08 20:06:10+00:00): Dit fietsverbod geldt ook voor bijvoorbeeld Weg: 165460172
Weg: 43402095
Alles ten zuiden van deze wegen mag je wel fietsen
MVRGr Willem
Tilia_J (2021-02-09 08:22:30+00:00): Heb je iets meer info over de omgrenzing van het fietsloze gebied?

Er stonden idd enkele highways op bicycle = no temidden van wel fietsbaar gebied
Willem Altes (2021-02-09 21:11:44+00:00): Op 4757352 zit ergens een knip. Die kan ik wel aangeven op de kaart. Er is een geen goede aanduiding In het bestemmingsplan zit deze: https://www.planviewer.nl/imro/files/NL.IMRO.0200.bp1152-vas1/i_NL.IMRO.0200.bp1152-vas1_0005.png. Binnen de afrastering rond de Leesterheid mag je niet fietsen. Het fietsverbod gaat ook verder naar het Noorden. Op het pad langs het Landje Boer de Vries (met het MTB-speelpad) mag je weer fietsen, maar op de hoek staat daar weer een bord.
Tilia_J (2021-02-10 07:36:30+00:00): De zwart onderbroken gestreepte ways staan nu op bicycle =no : http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/fiets/?map=cycleways&zoom=16&lat=52.16381&lon=5.91059&layers=B000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT
Willem Altes (2021-02-10 08:38:23+00:00): De knip bij het meest zuidoostelijke pad ligt iets verder naar het Noorden, (bij de kruising van al die paden). Je kan dit pad wel omhoog fietsen en bij de kruising rechtsaf slaan. Heb ik zaterdag nog gedaan: https://www.strava.com/activities/4745331716
Tilia_J (2021-02-11 09:17:04+00:00): Ik heb de knip aangepast. De hele situatie met wildrasters in dit gebied is mijns inziens nog niet accuraat. Ik verwacht hier binnenkort langs te komen en zal dan eens verder kijken.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 23:56:40+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12291312

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 23:59:26+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12291315

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12291316

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
WaldbachRoamer (2021-02-18 20:03:47+00:00): Sollte passen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98928486
blackboxlogic (2021-02-13 19:27:07+00:00): Thanks for adding buildings and merging in the addresses. Head's up, whatever process you're using here is producing odd building tags. See Way 905183250 which replaced node 7242699877. Node had building=detached. Way has building=yes;detached. If there is already a building tag, and you'd add building=yes, try to just keep the existing tag. This changeset could use some touch-up for that issue.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98928545
maraf24 (2021-02-08 21:13:30+00:00): Też wycofałem, było prawidłowo wyrysowane (po kalibracji).
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-08 23:56:33+00:00): Ciao, puoi spiegarmi l’errore che ho commesso?
maraf24 (2021-02-08 21:12:03+00:00): Wycofałem.
Cristoffs (2021-02-08 23:14:06+00:00): P. Krzysztofie pan coś więcej pisze w tych komentarzach ...
MxxCon (2021-02-09 02:28:16+00:00): 25 lanes? 🤨 I think that's a typo.
Also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tiger:reviewed states "This key is deprecated in the sense that you should not add it to a way that does not already have this key. "
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98929109
MxxCon (2021-02-09 02:30:55+00:00): Also perhaps it's better to reference https://vzv.nyc for speedlimits rather than a pdf from 2014?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98929109
TheBestIdea (2021-02-09 17:20:52+00:00): Thanks for point this out. Meant to change maxspeed to 25, not lanes. Fixed now https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98991517

Can you expand on what you're saying about the tiger key? I did not add any of them. I did split some ways that crossed the slow zone boundary so I guess the tags carried over.
MxxCon (2021-02-09 18:28:38+00:00): Maybe it's just the way osmcha displayed your changeset and I misinterpreted it. It looked like you created a road segment with a bunch of tags, including tiger ones and particularly "tiger: reviewed" one. So I was going to point out that it's not necessary to include that tag on newly created segments.
eggie (2021-02-08 20:41:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback.. Tip.. Beter geen vlakken vastmaken aan gebouwen.
Verder is de tagging van je speeltuin prima gelukt.
De gebouwen heb ik losgemaakt van het vlak.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-08 20:50:52+00:00): Dag postxif,

Probeer het gebied van je edits klein te houden.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op. 
Je hebt op één gebouw nog een gebouw ingetekend. (Bargelaan) Wanneer je onderscheid wilt maken gebruik dan de tag
building:part=yes  ipv building=
Je edits

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98929188

Zie ook 3D tagging in de wiki.

Mapse,
eggie
Protoxenus (2021-06-16 18:33:02+00:00): Bevor du etwas von Luftbildern abmalst, gucke mal bitte auf das Datum der Erstellung bzw. vergleiche mit anderen Bildern. Spart vielleicht dir und anderen Arbeit.
letihu (2021-06-16 19:27:25+00:00): Ich male nur selten was ab. Den Pfusch anderer Mapper kann ich auch so sehen.
Protoxenus (2021-06-16 19:40:14+00:00): Aha, dann bin ich ja beruhigt. Irgendetwas ändern ohne auch nur mal darüber nachzudenken, ob das etwas mit der Realität zu tun hat.
letihu (2021-06-16 20:25:42+00:00): Ist so etwas real?
Dieser Weg z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953101451/history
auf diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953836964/history
Deine Kritik ist auch nur pauschal, ohne meinen Fehler anzusprechen. Das hilft niemanden.
mariotomo (2021-02-12 13:44:22+00:00): hola.  el comentario "Calles" no ayuda: aquí has estado añadiendo, mejorando, cambiando, quitando nombres de ríos, calles, lugares.  y nunca mencionas tus fuentes.  podrías ayudarnos entender lo que haces, cómo lo haces?
mariotomo (2021-10-31 22:25:06+00:00): en el comentario "Calles" también añadiste un nombre raro: "Buena Vista (Spanish Town)". lo borraría si no fuera que quizás está bien, pero si no me contestas, qué hago?
VitalieS (2021-02-09 16:35:04+00:00): Hello.
Why isn't possible to leave the address for the building in the building details?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98929503
bkw777geo (2021-02-11 23:12:03+00:00): Hello VitalieS, looking at Maxar imagery it was not clear if the entire building shared one address so I created a node for the address information.
mariotomo (2021-02-12 13:38:30+00:00): hola.  porqué Báco con tilde?  cuál es la fuente de tantos nombres?  sólo mencionas "Calles" y "Bing".  puedes ayudar los demás a entender lo que haces?  gracias.
BigKev97 (2024-03-17 14:41:55+00:00): Baco sin tilde.
mariotomo (2024-03-18 15:36:06+00:00): sigues sin mencionar tus fuentes, y sigues editando.
karson_ (2021-02-08 23:23:30+00:00): You placed a church in the midde of what appears to be cornfield in all imagery sources. Are you sure there is actually a church here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98930089
TheBestIdea (2021-02-08 20:40:23+00:00): Should have just said "speed limit"
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-02-09 06:57:45+00:00): بداية موفقة أخ مساعد وشكرا على مساهمتك
boingoNYC (2021-02-16 11:13:45+00:00): thanks for contributing, what is the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905195746
amadvance (2021-02-08 21:40:38+00:00): Hi 20180911,

Using the CAI format in osmc:symbol for not CAI route is wrong. It's better to just not set the osmc:symbol for such kind of relations.

Ciao,
Andrea
20180911 (2021-02-08 21:48:58+00:00): I have already set this tag in the next 6 changesets. I will leave it out in future, except I know it is really a CAI route.
amadvance (2021-02-08 22:40:42+00:00): Good, Thanks!

Some other small things. I see that you call the route with a prefix "A", like "A718". Better to call them only with the number "718" as it's what you'll find on guideposts. The "A" format is a kind of new numbering scheme of the Regione Lombardia, but it won't be on the symbol.

For CAI routes, the correct symbol is the one with "white_stripe", and not with "white_bar". "white_bar" is only for very long refs, like 6 digits.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI

That route "A701" is really strange as already exists another CAI "701" disconnected from it. I know that it's on the Lombardia site, but I expect that such ref is just wrong. I would trust more the CAI site.

Ciao, and good mapping!
Andrea
user_1566574 (2021-02-09 17:40:30+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour vos contributions !

Cependant, à titre informatif, il n'est pas obligatoire d'ajouter le code postal et la ville sur les adresses.
En effet il peut être calculé par les géocodeurs que toutes les adresses se trouvant au sein de cette zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/155518 sont celles de la commune de Bief-du-Fourg, 39250, Doubs...

Un exemple ? https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=5924936039&class=place

Merci à vous pour vos contributions ! ;)
Cartographiquement. 🗺️
Futur3r (2021-02-08 22:42:39+00:00): Salut,
J'ai vu que tu a rajouté l'école sur le batiment.
Il y a déjà un POI pour l'école nommé "École primaire publique Villaz" juste à droite.

J'ai fait la correction, desfois pas tout est bon à prendre sur Streetcomplete :)

Merci pour tes contributions et n'hésite pas à découvrir un éditeur plus poussé comme https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Fr%3AWikiStart ou https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=98931194#map=19/45.95131/6.19095.

Pour plus d'information y'a le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Page_principale et si t'as besoin t'a une question : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Canaux_de_contact

A+
Glassman (2021-02-11 16:58:03+00:00): Thanks for fixing your first edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98930886