piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
abakus_uploader (2020-03-22 23:30:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Skinfaxi (2020-03-26 13:57:53+00:00): denna linje https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783555962?fbclid=IwAR31-pD_NC7a8AzAscQcWnOTOwE7MD7P4GKFEQUE4SzbwGWxJrLGfNvm5po
har inga attribut. kommer du att fortsätta med den arbete? misstänker att du vill rita en skogsbit eller liknande...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 14:19:37+00:00): I don't get how VK endyre Crimea shop can be a motorcycle shop, but then doesn't sell or rent motorcycles.
Timur_Crimea (2020-06-04 14:39:02+00:00): Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
"Tag:shop=motorcycle 
A shop that sells motorcycles AND/OR related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 14:40:58+00:00): What accessories etc does it sell then?
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 14:41:27+00:00): Because there's a lot of things on that list.
Timur_Crimea (2020-06-04 14:57:41+00:00): It sell motorcycles parts and tires. 
Tag:motorcycle:parts=yes.
Tag:motorcycle:tyres.
If you are interested in this store, you can visit their page on the social network, there are photos of the goods.
https://vk.com/endurocrimeashop

Or call them by phone +7(978)834-89-00
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 14:58:44+00:00): That works. Thanks for the information.
Timur_Crimea (2020-06-04 15:02:33+00:00): You are welcome!
abakus_uploader (2020-03-22 23:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2020-04-11 09:40:04+00:00): Hello,
Can you please explain what your source of adinistrative data for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10879003 was?  Has North Korea got some sort of open data portal that makes this sort of information available?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-11 09:40:27+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Не могли бы вы объяснить, каким был ваш источник административных данных для https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10879003? Есть ли в Северной Корее какой-то портал открытых данных, который делает такую информацию доступной?
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени Рабочей группы OSM по данным.
K-OGA (2020-03-23 10:56:34+00:00): 2Rad Feurstein: The owner has retired last year and there is no bicycle shop anymore! 

Please scrap the entry - it is just misleading as long as the entry is still on the map.
Connecticut (2020-03-23 11:01:26+00:00): Be patient. The icon on this map will vanish in the next days.
And all Programms ignore disused:shop
frosm (2020-04-01 14:27:33+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
l'opendata dit que c'est borne est payante, pourriez-vous vérifier ?
par ailleurs le nom du réseau des bornes se renseigne avec l'attribut réseau (network en anglais).
j'ajoute à l'instant les autres informations disponible en opendata grace au fait que vous avez ajouté la borne dans osm, merci. 
Bonne continuation
user_2066394 (2022-09-14 08:13:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126143956
gsa (2020-07-22 20:57:32+00:00): Die Positionen der Trinkwasserstellen "Mumelter-Brunnen" und "Binderstube" waren viel zu ungenau eingetragen. Die anderen Stellen kenne ich nicht, eventuell muss man die genaue Lage ebenfalls überprüfen.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:02:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mariotomo (2021-10-25 22:26:31+00:00): Hi. you still do remember what was the function of these installations?  you made them all "building" and partially described them in their names … https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
(es ist ok, auf Deutsch zu antworten.)
DaveF (2020-03-22 13:27:38+00:00): There is already a railway=station tag, please don't create extra.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-22 11:19:52+00:00): Please add English name to `name=` only, and record  `name:zh=`, `name:en=` along with any other language names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82478270
goedegazelle (2020-03-22 13:16:42+00:00): By removing the name you have destroyed the knowledge that it is a garage. Such data is collected by people who make personal observations and is therefore precious to OSM. The name may be incorrect in your view (and it is) but it contained informative data nevertheless. Removing it is more incorrect than the tagging itself.
eggie (2020-03-22 15:16:15+00:00): Hi vogelfreier
reverted in advance by changeset  #82485956
due to wrong interpretation name=Garage
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-22 10:45:26+00:00): review.. Je hebt dat hek /hondenuitlaatveld vastgemaakt aan dat wandelpad.. Beter losmaken..
Ook zo'n hondenveld kun je beter uitsnijden uit het gras. 

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82478493

eggie
branib (2020-03-23 10:33:54+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks & Regards,
Branib
Kovoschiz (2020-03-22 11:37:36+00:00): Which are by me... Would you not think `gate:wings=` is unnecessarily over-namespacing though? I suppose the intention of `door:wings=` is to prevent mistake once and for all as doors are often combined with other features, but I'm not sure if that's necessary either.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-22 11:42:51+00:00): Also I guess this applies to rotational gates ("turning") only.
mueschel (2020-03-22 11:43:43+00:00): It's hard to say which of the two tags is better. I think it's best to just stay with one version for the moment - once there is some discussion or agreement one can easily change everything to the then-accepted tag.


But: I just found that  gate:type=double  is used quite often. There's no documentation for it, but it seems to describe exactly what you want...
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gate%3Atype#values
Kovoschiz (2020-03-22 11:46:59+00:00): That's a very quick reply. At the moment prompted by you I have been trying to improve the wiki page. Problem is obviously it conflicts with other gate details.
mueschel (2020-03-22 11:56:38+00:00): Where do you see a conflict? 
There might be one between double/single and swing - but I think this can be solved by writing a proper definition and maybe adding one or two more values.
mueschel (2020-03-24 08:53:27+00:00): Hi,
you added some contradicting maxspeeds here, e.g.
maxspeed = 80
maxspeed:mph = 60
Could you check and fix this?

There should be just one tag, and the unit should be part of the value:
maxspeed = 80 mph
JJJWegdam (2020-03-24 12:28:32+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the heads-up. The 80 kmh / 60 mph is indeed a mistake; I'll fix it. 
I do wonder though, how to tag links between NR and the CTRL (domestic and international network). These tracks have physical speed limit signs both in mph and kmph. I was unsure about this and thus "invented" the maxspeed:mph key. Would you advise mph, kmph or (in some way) both on these tracks?
mueschel (2020-03-25 14:07:50+00:00): I'd think that these signs usually agree with each other. In this case they can easily be converted (within the typical precision) and I would tag the "more common" units. 

To tag the sign itself, there is 
railway:signal:speed_limit - mostly used in DE and AT, but it's supposed to work like 'traffic_sign' on roads - to tag precise information about the sign.
tux67 (2020-08-03 14:11:45+00:00): Hi kmpoppe, wenn ich das richtig sehe, dann hattest du mit diesem CS den landuse von Ortsverband zu Regionalstelle umbenamst. Jetzt gibt es hier eine Note die besagt die Regionalstelle ist in der Dohrstraße. Laut Webseite das THW in MG ist das auch korrekt. Außerdem verstehe ich auf der Webseite auch, daß der Ortsverband doch  genau hier an der Lilienthalstraße liegt. https://www.thw.de/SharedDocs/Organisationseinheiten/DE/Ortsverbaende/M/Moenchengladbach_Ortsverband.html?nn=922532&oe=2000712&standort=1 
Bevor ich das jetzt einfach zurückdrehe - magst du mal schauen warum das damals geändert wurde? Gruß tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82479445
mapman44 (2020-03-22 12:50:39+00:00): Some paths are marked as one-way and thus validation shows them as having no way out. Is this what you intended?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82479524
mapman44 (2020-04-06 20:19:04+00:00): Since you did not respond to my earlier message, I have fixed the one-way paths. If that is incorrect please respond and we'll get it straightened out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82479524
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-23 08:39:08+00:00): iD yra labai blogas redaktorius ir siūlo nesąmoningus pakeitimus. Nereikia niekada klausyti, ką jis siūlo „taisyti“. Atstačiau sugadintą tvenkinio žymėjimą.
user_5359 (2020-03-22 19:51:33+00:00): See https://www.osm.org/relation/10875822
Leo Slager (2020-03-22 23:53:31+00:00): Dag BikePC,
In de NO-hoek van je changeset heb je een waterway=drain verwijderd.  Is daar geen verbinding tussen de 2 waters ?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82480441
BikePC (2020-03-23 00:22:10+00:00): Ben me er niet van bewust dat ik die verwijderd heb, maar heb drain weer ingetekend.
Leo Slager (2020-03-23 00:38:10+00:00): Sorry, ben er ook nog niet achter wat er nou precies gebeurd is daar.
BikePC (2020-03-23 09:40:32+00:00): Ik was bezig om landuses en naturals weer netjes aan elkaar te knopen. Er zijn daar heel veel waterpartijen die klakkeloos over landuses zijn gekwakt. Zo goed en zo kwaad als het gaat - er is nog heel veel te doen en er zitten echt nog wel schoonheidsfoutjes in. Kost heel veel tijd. Zie ook changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82495217
BikePC (2020-03-23 20:53:51+00:00): Vandaag 2020-03-23 erheen gefietst. Tussen Pres. Wilsonpad en bouwterrein tunnelaanleg bruggen en duikers gecorrigeerd en water beter uitgelijnd (PDOK 25cm latest).
user_5359 (2020-03-22 19:51:11+00:00): See https://www.osm.org/relation/10875822
Pikse (2020-06-29 07:10:31+00:00): Nõmme tänaval ja teistel Tallinna tänavatel, mis koosnevad mitmest joonest, on relatsioon. Atribuudid, mis käivad kogu tänava kohta, peaks minu arusaamise järgi olema ainult relatsiooni küljes. Siin ja veel paari Tallinna tänava juures Wikidata id-d praegu dubleeritud.
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-22 14:11:30+00:00): Hi Lucio DB, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting almost 520 landuse' areas? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious-change-viz?c=82480584

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2020-03-22 19:50:45+00:00): See https://www.osm.org/relation/10875822
RicoElectrico (2020-03-22 22:50:14+00:00): Hej, doszczegółowiłem ten punkt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7319084685/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dadvertising_agency

Niestety maps.me ma bardzo mało dostępnych typów obiektów w edytorze. Znacznie lepiej jest iD, edytorze online, którego można używać na komputerze. Bardzo polecam, bo w nim przynajmniej jest możliwość kasowania obiektów, rysowania kształtów (np. dróg, budynków) i wiele więcej.
dmlu (2020-03-22 19:35:01+00:00): Merci! :)
!bm (2020-03-22 12:05:31+00:00): Hallo kidney! Ich habe deine zahlreichen Verbesserungsversuche korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82481236 --besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82480681
olehz (2020-03-22 18:45:47+00:00): от якого хєра видаляти ПС та ЛЕП і створювати якусь нову діч?!
olehz (2020-03-22 18:56:45+00:00): https://nadoloni.com/#14.71/51.18289/24.63843 - ось так було (як по схемах). дофіга роботи, а потім приходить тупорилий свінорус і все коту під хвіст
user_5359 (2020-03-22 19:50:15+00:00): See https://www.osm.org/relation/10875822
mueschel (2020-03-23 11:08:01+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Die Tags die du hier verwendet hast, gibt es so sonst nirgends.
Schau dir doch am besten mal die umliegenden Schutzgebiete an um die üblichen Tags kennenzulernen.

Im Wiki findest du auch einiges, z.B. unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

Grüße
Jan
kotok (2020-05-27 10:41:06+00:00): Хочупоцікавитись чи плануєте щось далі робити з незавершеним полігоном?
gscscnd (2020-03-22 14:43:07+00:00): Usunąłeś dwa chmielniki: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695608638> i <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695608639>, i zastąpiłeś je polem <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783605533>. To nowe pole jest o tyle dobre, że obejmuje obszar, który dotychczas był (na OSM) pusty, ale wydaje mi się, że osobne obrysy dla tych dwóch chmielników można by zostawić. Na Geoportalu ich jeszcze nie ma, możesz je zobaczyć na niektórych powiększeniach Esri World Imagery.
mueschel (2020-03-24 09:30:44+00:00): Hi,
you introduced two new tags here:
"ground wires"
"ground wire"
These tags are not yet documented nor used in other places. The tag "ground_conductors" has been used a few times already. Could you change your tags to this one?

Thanks
Jan
rab (2020-03-22 12:52:46+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir sicher daß das Straßennetz hier so dicht geknüpft ist?
Du solltest die wirklich wichtigen Wege herausarbeiten und hervorheben. Das bedeutet auch, die unwichtigen Trampelpfade einfach mal wegzulassen. Andernfalls wird man hier bald vor lauter Wald keine Bäume mehr sehen
uliwanne (2020-03-22 16:59:21+00:00): Hallo rab
Das ist nach unseren Maßstäben sicherlich kein Straßennetz. Der Großteil sind unbefestigte, jehreszeitlich bedingt nutzbare Tracks. Verstanden habe ich das die Gesundheitsbehörden wissen wollen, wo Leute wohnen und wie sie erreicht werden können. Da ist ein Weg zu viel besser als 10 zu wenig! Die Dichte ist dann eben mal so. Weiter geht es für den Wasserver- und Entsorger NWasco darum Die Bevölkerung mit Wasser zu versorgen, per Pipeline, Tankwagen oder Kiosk. Wie kann man das am besten organisieren?
uliwanne (2020-03-22 17:00:34+00:00): Ich habe wohl noch zu wenige Häuser bzw Besiedlungen kartiert!
Oder reicht das wohl?
rab (2020-03-22 18:57:12+00:00): Hallo uliwanne, du kannst über den Tasking Manager direkt den verantwortlichen Projektmanager kontaktieren. (Björn Haßler - Deutsch sollte also genügen) Falls du da keine Antwort bekommst, solltest du dir ein aktiveres Projekt suchen. Da sind die Chancen auf Unterstützung und Feedback wesentlich höher.
Frans S (2020-04-27 10:50:53+00:00): Hi. A remark
Please pay attention to the errors/warnings which show up on the issue triangle of the right hand menu.
Solve these issues if possible  before uploading your work
Another issue
Do not use the tag footway. Path  is more suitable here
Please stick to the required mapping objects. It makes no sense to map a kind of fence with bushes and ponds.
I removed them
Best regards
Frans S (2020-04-27 11:07:55+00:00): Hi. back again
1) Most buildings are square so your mapping should reflect that, please remember to square your buildings by pressing the q key while the building is selected. 2) Please outline the buildings as closely as possible to the actual shape and try not to include the shadows of the buildings. 3) Map each building separately.
4) Connect paths/highways to each other so that they become a network.
5. Let paths / highways do not cross buildings. 
Best regards
Michael_Smith (2020-04-27 17:45:43+00:00): Dear Frans S,
Thank you for your continued support. I apologize for the incorrect use of the footway, and for mapping the bushes and ponds. Thank you for taking the time to delete them and correct my mistakes. I will make sure to stick to the required objects from now on, and will do my best to map them correctly as per your points above. Sorry for the inconvenience caused, and thank you once again.
With Kind Regards,
Michael.
user_5359 (2020-03-23 17:52:28+00:00): Hello! You add a new node with traffic signals (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7319236037). Did you see this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4166678289?
Glassman (2020-03-22 19:02:01+00:00): A couple of the driveways crossed streams. I've added tunnel=culvert + layer=-1 to the driveways.
rekulc1 (2020-03-23 05:41:19+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for correcting the incomplete edit. Apologies that I missed to add them.
Looking forward to learning from the community.

Thanks, 
rekulc1.
tuxayo (2020-04-01 20:20:26+00:00): Est-ce que la caméra est au dessus de la route ou au dessus du trottoir?
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-22 14:15:26+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82482808
BCNorwich (2020-03-22 14:35:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
How about adding the footpath then please?
Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2020-03-22 13:39:38+00:00): That looks fine, it's just added the new tag and hasn't deleted any other tags.
gscscnd (2020-03-22 15:02:09+00:00): Zaznaczając boisko jako obszar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783615294) powinieneś usunąć węzeł <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7152183259>. Jeden obiekt w rzeczywistości to jeden obiekt na OpenStreetMap. Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82485616>.
Takogin (2020-03-25 09:45:50+00:00): Hi! I've noticed that you relations on OSM have incorrect render. Probably the best way is to draw ways without tags and then add tags only to a relation. It's weird that lines have tag wetland (this tag used only for area objects). It would be nice if you   will correct it!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82482266
eggie (2020-03-22 15:03:15+00:00): Oke nu...
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-22 14:15:02+00:00): Hi meomancer, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
geri-oc (2020-04-04 06:54:56+00:00): Hallo dad401,

Danke für die "Bankschließung" - habe es korrigiert mit disused:*=* 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
Falls es nicht mehr als Geschäft / Bank eingerichtet werden Kann (Ausbau als Wohnung) sollte abandoned:*=* verwendet werden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:abandoned:

Grüße aus FreiTal von Gerd
richlv (2022-02-10 08:52:07+00:00): Hi, this changeset left a straight path of ~1.5 km marked as underground, crossing a few cliffs.
Is this expected?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141977386
mtrutman (2022-02-10 09:04:49+00:00): Yes, this is expected. It is an underground tunnel connecting two neighbouring valleys. It is well passable except for a short wet section at south end. There more tunnels like this in this area. Some of those are carrying water for irrigation purposes, but this one is just a tunnel.
richlv (2022-02-10 19:10:25+00:00): Oh wow, that's very interesting - thank you for confirming :)
~Jhellico (2020-03-24 18:22:20+00:00): Назви вулиць мають зазначатися українською — https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#.D0.92.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D1.96
SomeoneElse (2020-03-22 14:10:44+00:00): Replying to private message received at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert :
It looks from http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=214292922 like you might have created this account to try and avoid discussing the blocks at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 etc. with us and the rest of the community.
OpenStreetmap is a shared database, and we need to work together to create the best map.  This means that when other mappers want to discuss things with you, you cannot just ignore them.  You have been asked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3576 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3578 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 to do various things (including enaging other mappers) and you have not done so.  If you are ready to do that please email data@osmfoundation.org to let us know and we'll revoke the original block at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3572 .  Once we've done that please, before doing any editing, reply to all of those users who have commented on the changesets by your many users.  Explain why you have changed the names (such as for example in this changeset) and discuss it with them before making any further changes to OSM.  Any attempt to just force through your changes will, of course, be reverted again.  We'd like to see you able to contribute to OpenStreetMap, but that means working with the rest of the community, not against it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.