piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeroenrozema74 (2021-12-07 21:29:04+00:00): Hallo,

Ich versuche es auf Deutsch.
Das kann gut sein, aber ich bin mich nicht ganz sicher wie das "Path" dort genau läuft. Letzte Mal war ich dort in April 2019. Vielleicht kannst du es  eintragen ? 

Viele Grüße,
Jeroen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
mapper377 (2021-02-18 00:30:16+00:00): Unintentionally, no changeset comment was uploaded. It would be: "Add details at a substation on South Forman Road at 72nd Street in Yates Township, Lake County, MI. Available imagery is not clear enough to see internal details or line connections into the substation."
skquinn (2021-02-18 13:46:45+00:00): What is this changeset supposed to be, and why does it stretch across a huge swath of the southern US?
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:51:19+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 98738246, 98743753, 98744385, 98744797, 98746598, 98748513, 98755574, 98799632, 98799769, 98799926, 98800087, 98800468, 98804286, 98804629, 98807999, 98808438, 98809019, 98835036, 98835379, 98838838, 98838919, 98839034, 98839199, 98840695, 98841323, 98841460, 98843986, 98844324, 98845217, 98881972, 98882760, 98883693, 98885333, 98885881, 98941714, 98941857, 99016221, 99016898, 99069117, 99069957, 99070073, 99070764, 99088951.
user_5359 (2021-02-18 18:24:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add many unusually keys to the school https://www.osm.org/way/908245794. Please add the correct year to start_date.
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2021-02-22 01:25:01+00:00): Hey, I did some smoothing on your work. Based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-24 09:58:29+00:00): Hi  dee_ksha,
your highway digitizing is good. But, 
I have changed the highway classification  based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
How about residential classification, dee_ksha?
Kindly check with
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/908247266
Thank you.
dee_ksha (2021-05-24 10:41:48+00:00): Hi Irma IRM-ED,

Hope your doing well, we have cross checked the way id which you have changed the classification from service to residential. Its absolutely correct what you have done. Thanks for the update & information as well. we hope these kind of mistakes will not be happen again.

Regards,
dee_ksha
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-25 01:20:21+00:00): Hi dee_ksha, 
Thanks for your feedback :)
Supaplex (2021-02-18 06:35:16+00:00): 這應該不是 building 吧
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99483682
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Sammyhawkrad (2021-02-19 08:08:32+00:00): Welcome to the OSM Project Fiifi. I hope you will continue to add places to help everyday people find places.

Kindly capitalise the first letter of accra => Accra. You may use the description tag to mention the services provided by the business and delete the addr:postcode. It's not practically used in Ghana.  addr:street is used to record the name of the street the business is located on so you may rather use addr:suburb for Ashongman Estates.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99484045
user_5359 (2021-02-18 18:05:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If the operator has not served this stop for a year, shouldn't we delete the bus stop (or set it to disused)?
raphaelc19 (2021-02-18 18:13:16+00:00): Thank you for the welcome message. Still trying to figure out how to use OSM.

The operator has not served this stop in at least 2 years, but I suspect it has been actually 5 years.

The physical structure is still there, so I don't think we should delete the bus stop, but maybe set it to disused would be a good idea. I did not know we could do that.
user_5359 (2021-02-18 18:53:41+00:00): I add the prefix disused: to the node.
Hedaja (2021-02-19 08:58:18+00:00): Hi
I saw you split East 50th Ave https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885690689.
Usually I keep the points merged at the crossing. Its a bit weird either way because of how we represent wide roads with a one-demensional line. Having both connect at the junction helps show more correctly what the junction is about in my opinion. Having them split means that you'll have to turn right and immediately left again to go across the Picadilly Road while in reality you just drive straight across.
Let me know what you think.
-Hedaja
00Sterling (2021-02-20 02:02:33+00:00): Hi. I was going to drive by it again to see the traffic island.
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-03-24 01:02:07+00:00): Hi ponna_kanti. I changed the classification of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/908252293). I also made some change around this changeset. Thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
adiatmad (2021-02-18 03:16:46+00:00): Hello anchtiger. You have a great mapping here. I would recommend you press the Q button to square the buildings.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99485302
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:28:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8433530823/history has 2=2 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
JayTurnr (2021-02-18 03:15:45+00:00): I guess not Bing lol. I usually use Bing
user_5359 (2021-02-19 05:46:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
ZLima12 (2021-11-16 00:50:51+00:00): Looks like part of the river (https://openstreetmap.org/node/7805262616) was glued to a bridge that carries I-86 here, resulting in a misshapen bridge when you fixed the river's geometry. I'll unglue the bridge from it.
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-16 01:00:52+00:00): My bad, thanks for fixing this!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-21 20:48:54+00:00): Are you sure about this?  If I look at the underlying Bing imagery I can't really see what you have drawn here.
c tito young (2021-02-22 04:26:33+00:00): Hi Andy

Start by looking for the eyes and then head.. mouth.. and so forth.  Its there.
bingo (2021-02-18 05:50:04+00:00): sorry wrong comment I corrected addr:state
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:18:24+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as shop that was deleted still exists
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:18:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as hardware store that was deleted still exists
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:02:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as such street names do not exist or were mistagged
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
_Mathieu_ (2021-03-25 16:04:39+00:00): Bonjour Simon,
L'interdiction aux vélos est récente ? Il me semble que la signalisation à cet endroit n'interdit l'accès qu'aux piétons.
Mathieu
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:10:32+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as location of restaurant on the map was moved meters away from its actual location
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:12:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as food shop and restaurant that were deleted probably still exist
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:17:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as restaurant that was deleted probably still exists and that the location of fast food on the map were moved meters away from their actual locations
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:08:52+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as location of supermarket on the map was moved meters away from its actual location and its name was modified without any valid reason/justification
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:09:46+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as gas shop that was deleted still exists
ianlopez1115 (2021-02-24 12:08:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99879350 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99879350) as location of restaurants on the map were moved meters away from its actual location and one restaurant's name was modified without any valid reason/justification
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-18 09:40:11+00:00): Hi namprati,
why are you removing the 'highway' tags from the service roads?
You just leave "type=pedestrian", which is meaningless alone, and an unusual tagging anyway. 
Without the highway tag, you lose the connection of the campus to the road network.
abakus_uploader (2021-02-18 23:32:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
DD1GJ (2021-02-18 09:40:44+00:00): Hallo Jup!,
die Wegteile sind kein normaler Pfad sondern  ein Gebirgspfad/Klettersteig, für den eine gewisse Erfahrung und Ausrüstung erforderlich ist. Dieses Tagging wurde bewusst eingesetzt, damit auf den "normalen Karten" kein Weg dargestellt wird. Den kompletten Klettersteig findest Du als Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6496849

Ich habe Deine Änderungen daher zurückgesetzt.
user_9385968 (2021-02-21 08:21:07+00:00): Hallo,
Seit JAHREN war das als Weg eingetragen! Dort kommt man auch ohne Ausrüstung hoch! Leider wird das nun nicht mehr in den Karten angezeigt. nur weil die Löschliesel daranherum gefummelt hat. Danke dafür! Dann löscht doch gleich das ganze Gebiet! Der Salewasteig ist auch als path eingetragen ... Hauptsache löschen !
DD1GJ (2021-02-21 10:32:17+00:00): OSM ist in erster Linie eine Geo-Datenbank, aus der Karten für die unterschiedlichsten Anwendungsfälle generiert werden. Die Standard-Karte kann und will nicht jede Spezialität darstellen. Es wurde in der Datenbank nichts gelöscht, sondern anders beschrieben.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
geo_roads (2021-02-22 21:51:27+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding the Flyover Tarumanagara. Does it exist yet, or is it still being planned or under construction? If it is under construction, it should be mapped as highway=construction: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Lars Meyer - YNCORIS (2021-02-18 16:01:11+00:00): #YNCORIS
user_5359 (2021-02-18 17:21:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more information to the building (like address (addr:housenumber, addr:street, ... and contact information like website (https://www.yncoris.com/ ?), phone)
Lars Meyer - YNCORIS (2021-02-18 21:16:01+00:00): Thanks, we will have to check if we can provide further information for the buildings inside our industry park. There is no physical adress of the building due to its position within our own area. Further contact information is / will be provided on our wiki-site. 

In case of further questions please contact  me via PM
Lars Meyer - YNCORIS (2021-02-18 21:57:33+00:00): What also has to be mentioned, is the fact that there are customer-buildings at our site where we can only draw the outer lines without providing further information, due to confidentiality agreements.
user_5359 (2021-02-19 05:10:27+00:00): There is no need to provide information for each individual building in a protected area. I noticed the first entry and the subsequent comment on the change set.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Lars Meyer - YNCORIS (2021-02-18 16:01:02+00:00): #YNCORIS
Lars Meyer - YNCORIS (2021-02-18 16:00:51+00:00): #YNCORIS
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-18 09:42:45+00:00): Hi namprati,
there is no "natural=grassland" within a city. 
Use landuse=grass and landcover=grass.
aceman444 (2021-02-27 20:12:39+00:00): Hi, the cemetery already existed as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55636071, why did you add a duplicate? You should have added the name to the area object.
aceman444 (2021-02-27 20:28:26+00:00): Also what is the source of the name "Cintorín Bystričany", it looks quite generic. Thanks.
tikend (2021-03-01 08:39:26+00:00): Sorry, the place was not visible as a POI in the OsmAnd app. Not sure if area POI are there to edit
tikend (2021-03-01 08:44:38+00:00): It is know like that in the village
aceman444 (2021-02-27 20:33:03+00:00): Hi, the soccer pitch was correct, if you want to  draw a stadium, you outline the whole campus, including buildings of the stadium and other facilities. And you put sport into 'sport' tag, e.g. sport=soccer, not as random remark into 'description'. Thanks
tikend (2021-03-01 08:45:47+00:00): If I remember correctly, I have changed the tag, not just description.

I was not aware that only American English is valid, good to know
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-18 10:09:07+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99502481
aceman444 (2021-02-27 20:11:34+00:00): Hi, why the deletion? Is the stationary shop gone? But there is now free room for a shop, next time add shop=vacant (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant), instead of pure deletion.
aceman444 (2021-02-28 12:27:50+00:00): Hi, I visited the place and the shop is still there, with signs on the wall and opening hours. It looks operating, it is just closed due to COVID restrictions. Yes, there is a sign that they are selling out and the room is for rent. But that does not mean the shop ceased to exist. So where did you get information warranting total removal of the shop? Always add source of your changes into the description of your changesets. Thanks.
tikend (2021-03-01 08:38:17+00:00): Thank you for the info, I did not know about this rule fore closed places