piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-09-16 19:31:57+00:00): Congrats on 91 million
eggie (2020-09-16 17:53:30+00:00): Dag AllGo,
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Probeer als het even kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Dus niet zelf adressen aanmaken.
Een deel van je toevoegingen liggen buiten de gebouwen.
Je verwijderde bij een aantal nodes de naam, maar laat de bedrijfsinfo staan.
Pub de Smidse, Schotsman..
Kijk nog even naar je edits of je iets kunt verbeteren
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91000080
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-12-25 08:44:14+00:00): Beste Alsoft,
Waarom een veld met bare_rock bij een jeux de boules baan ? ...en verder name=Steenslag? Ben wel nieuwsgierig. 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-25 08:46:16+00:00): Moet dit niet gewoon surface=gravel zijn en is het gewoon een leisure=pitch?
eggie (2020-12-25 08:47:36+00:00): Zie wiki over bare_rock
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbare_rock
eggie (2020-12-25 09:01:35+00:00): Er lopen ook lijnelementen  service=parking_aisle over het sportterrein en op de parkeerplaats zijn het highway=unclassified. Kijk svp nog eens een keer.
Denk dat de namen ook wegkunnen P  =voetbal 

Ik pas wat aan hier want ik denk niet dat het klopt. 
gr eggie
Talkless (2021-10-19 17:10:25+00:00): Sveikas,
Matau tai gan neseniai pridėta greičio kamera, bet jos nėra https://gis.eismoinfo.lt/arcgis/apps/View/index.html?appid=4c1702fdbfcc476bbe63ae0d166505a4 žemėlapyje . Galvojau panaudosiu tą žemėlapį pašalinti "pasenusias" kameras, bet kad tavoji pridėta vos prieš metus... Gal yra koks geresnis šaltinis?
Talkless (2021-10-19 17:15:45+00:00): Tai kad pagal Mapillary nuotrauką čia tiesog oro stebėjimo stotelė: 
https://gis.eismoinfo.lt/arcgis/apps/View/index.html?appid=4c1702fdbfcc476bbe63ae0d166505a4

Pavažiavus "atgal" nėra įspėjamojo ženklo apie greičio matuoklį.
b-unicycling (2025-03-01 17:39:58+00:00): Hi Brian, could you check the spelling whether it's Middleton or Midleton in that source for the Poor Law Union, we got an inquiry via the website asking whether the "historical data" was spelt wrong. According to logainm, the civil parish is spelt with two d (https://www.logainm.ie/en/658), so that seems to be correct.
tordans (2020-09-20 08:00:38+00:00): JFYI, falls du diese Folgeänderung noch nicht gesehen hast: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91052644?aoi=aa999729-e5f4-408a-914b-b7318f6b2b16
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91001499
tordans (2020-09-20 07:56:59+00:00): JFYI, wenn du ganz genau sein willst: der hintere Teil, wo die Zufahrt abknickt, ist eine Lieferrampe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91001731
Supaplex030 (2020-09-20 15:51:27+00:00): Ah, danke - diese Stelle hatte ich mir vor Ort nämlich nicht genau angeschaut und hatte dann erst auf den Luftbildern gesehen "das da was ist". Hab es noch etwas spezifiziert.
BCNorwich (2020-09-17 07:12:31+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A couple of points about this contribution to OSM. 
The two buildings would look neater if squared up, (select the two buildings, (shift+ctrl+left mouse button on each building), right mouse button, click the square symbol (shortcut Q)).

The footpath Way: 848151951, tagged as layer=-1 indicates that it is underneath the building layer, (underground). I don't think this is actually the case. If it is a passageway it should be tagged the same as the passageway on Convair Walk with highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage, no layer tag. Please see here for full explanation:- https://tinyurl.com/y3hz6eht

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
mueschel (2020-09-17 10:50:24+00:00): Hi,
please check these edits. The nodes all have several strange tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g.

ref_GmlID=zony260.99
ref_id_pa=131
ref_ogc_fid=99
olo81 (2020-11-28 22:51:56+00:00): Czy tutaj jest jakiekolwiek oznakowanie dopuszczające rower? 
Nie kojarzę żeby coś budowali w tym miejscu. 
Jeśli nie ma oznakowania to wręcz powinno się dać zakaz rowerom. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180760062#map=17/50.27869/19.12776
tsp15 (2020-11-28 23:33:03+00:00): Jest tutaj ciąg dla pieszych z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerów, tj. C-16 + T-22.
olo81 (2020-11-29 01:44:36+00:00): oo, to zaskoczenie :) 
trochę inaczej taguje takie wynalazki ale tak też może być :) 
Z tego co czytałem ostatnio chyba nielegalne jest już to oznakowanie :x
ralley (2020-09-16 18:48:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Please don't use the name key for descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things  In this case since the tennis courts are removed just delete way 520203785
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91002631
ralley (2020-09-18 04:50:21+00:00): Fixed
Sanniu (2020-09-22 07:25:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635874987 - is it roundabout?
yrtimiD (2020-09-22 13:38:02+00:00): I don't remember there any roundabout signs. Just a round shaped road which is mostly parking for busses. There is constant road construction in this area, so things change on daily basis.
Sanniu (2020-09-23 07:31:40+00:00): Ok, let it lay as-is for some time.
IpswichMapper (2020-09-16 18:43:18+00:00): NOTE: Naptan bus data was imported a long time ago, so many of the bus stops have disappeared / changed names. This will have to be fixed manually.
maption (2020-09-16 19:30:29+00:00): testing comment response time
olo81 (2020-09-21 17:52:08+00:00): Dlaczego oneway:bicycle=no 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173468542 
Kontrapas jest jednokierunkowy ! Zgodnie z kierunkiem drogi rowerzysta jedzie ulicą a w przeciwnym kierunku kontrapasem.
olo81 (2020-09-21 18:05:08+00:00): Jest ok, już mi się miesza po nocnej zmianie :)
opencarpatia (2020-09-16 23:27:22+00:00): Що за "правки"?
Myazyk (2020-09-17 17:38:54+00:00): Читай тут: http://sum.in.ua/s/pravka
opencarpatia (2020-09-17 18:06:23+00:00): Прошу не хамити. Будь ласка поясни - в чому конкретно полягає суть твоїх змін? По історії видно що ти взагалі не робиш абсолютно ніяких пояснень (мається на увазі: чому? яке джерело? нотатки для інших контриб'юторів та користувачів? і т.д.).

Також прошу переглянути наступні матеріали та взяти їх до уваги: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD

Please don't be rude. Please explain - what these changes are about? According to your history, you don't explain any changes at all (meaning: why? source? notes for other contributors or consumers? etc.).

Also please review the following materials and please take them into consideration: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Myazyk (2020-09-17 20:31:21+00:00): "Будь ласка поясни - в чому конкретно полягає суть твоїх змін?" - у цьому чомусь питальному реченні надто багато пунтуаційних помилок, аби розуміти його лексичне значення
opencarpatia (2020-09-18 13:46:56+00:00): Скільки саме тут помилок в реченні і яких? Ти дійсно не можеш зрозуміти написане чи продовжуєш хамити і тролити? Я намагаюсь зрозуміти в чому полягають твої зміни але бачу тільки два слова "вніс правки" які ти продовжуєш писати навіть в нових внесках.

Which exactly and how much mistakes I've made? Do you really can not understand my question or you keep being rude and just trolling? I am trying to understand what are your changes about but I see only two words "made change" that you keep doing in your new changesets.
Darellur (2020-09-24 12:25:18+00:00): Why have you created a building on top of a building? Is it really the case on the ground?
Mike Eggen (2020-09-30 03:21:31+00:00): Sorry about that - was trying to make an edit but should have deleted the other building first
Mike Eggen (2020-09-30 03:22:23+00:00): Go ahead and edit if you can
Darellur (2020-10-01 07:03:51+00:00): Why would you want to delete the first building? You could have edited the shape
eggie (2020-09-16 19:56:39+00:00): Beste Maarten... Spreek je vanuit ervaring in mappen in OSM dat je het nodig vindt om de administratieve grens van Den haag te verwijderen.
Graag reactie,
Eggie
MaartenTheMapper (2020-09-16 20:11:12+00:00): Per de documentatiepagina gaat admin level 10 over woonplaatsen als onderverdeling binnen een gemeente. Die kent Den Haag niet. Ik heb ervaring met databeheer en wikipedia, en duplicate data leiden tot meer dataverbruik, meer onderhoudswerk en meer fouten. Dus vandaar. Maar als het de conventie is om altijd voor zowel gemeente als woonplaats een way te hebben, kan ik hem wel undo'en/opnieuw maken. Dan zet ik meteen een notitie bij de documentatie,
eggie (2020-09-16 20:20:05+00:00): Dag Maarten..
Ik heb even advies gevraagd op het forum. Dit omdat ik edits zie van wat een relatief weinig actieve mapper betreft. 
Mocht er op gerreageerd worden dan zou je hier kunnen aanhaken.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=801494#p801494

De taken zijn verdeeld en bepaald mappers houden zich bezig met bounderies. 
Overigens van harte welkom bij OSM.
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-16 20:30:50+00:00): Voorlopig draai ik deze changeset terug. Het omtaggen van de tramlijnen naar lightrail geeft ook bezwaren
eggie (2020-09-16 20:34:59+00:00): reverted by changeset  #91006532
Je kunt even aanhaken bij dit forumdraadje.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account met helaas in dit geval vertraging wegens accountcheck als je nooit eerder in forum bent ingelogd.
Gr eggie
Friendly_Ghost (2020-09-16 23:57:48+00:00): Volgens de website heet de kinderopvang Kinderopvang Wageningen (dus zonder .nl). https://www.kinderopvang-wageningen.nl/nl/ORGANISATIE
Cartographer10 (2020-09-17 06:14:49+00:00): Heb het gewijzigd. Op het pand staat heel groot: "kinderopvang-wageningen.nl" en dat staat ook als titel op de website vandaar dat ik dat had gepakt maar zonder .nl en - is ook prima.
muralito (2020-09-16 21:43:23+00:00): Hola. Gracias por los aportes.

En "name" solo se pone el nombre actual de la calle. Si es de interés mantener el nombre viejo se pone en la etiqueta "old_name".
Pikse (2020-12-07 18:18:16+00:00): Peaks olema "Ülejõe ringtee" ja "Laupa-Telga tee". Teenimedest või aadressidest jäetakse lühendamisel reeglina ära vaid liigisõna "tänav". Vt peatükki "Nimede täis- ja lühikuju"  siin: http://keeleabi.eki.ee/artiklid3/tanavanimed.html
pio2_122 (2020-09-17 14:25:31+00:00): For old names use old_name:[lang], not name:[lang].
eggie (2021-05-03 07:52:09+00:00): Hi Paul...  
You are asking for feedback. 
A meadow in a forest. Please use multipolygons otherwise you will see trees and in your meadow. 
Greetz,
eggie
Nakaner (2021-01-17 17:53:26+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du mir bitte erklären, welchen Sinn name=Hauptstraße bei diesen Gebäuden hat? Das wirkt für mich nicht richtig.

Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267073050/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
Shl-EF (2021-01-17 18:20:26+00:00): ist auch nicht richtig. 
war wohl ein Versehen. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Grüße
Stefan
naveenpf (2020-09-22 09:26:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91006448
iandees (2020-09-17 02:49:44+00:00): Hi! When you're mapping/cleaning up driveways, make sure to also change them from residential roads to driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91006804
duck57 (2020-11-04 15:56:54+00:00): Was there a particular reason why the leisure=park tag was deleted from the metro parks?
Simen Heggestøyl (2020-09-17 16:07:07+00:00): Hm, ble krysset Vahls gate/Jens Bjelkes gate riktig nå? Man kan ta til både venstre og høyre fra både venstre og høyre felt, men forskjellen på dem er at det venstre feltet er for kollektivtrafikk. Men mulig at jeg bare leser karttegningen feil, og at et navigasjonssystem fortsatt vil skjønne at man kan ligge i høyre felt og ta til venstre?
SHARCRASH (2022-02-14 12:53:44+00:00): Bonjour! Mettre "cutting=yes" sur un chemin avec en plus un élément indépendant "barrier=retaining_wall" fait double emploi et duplique sur les données/carte. C'est comme si vous mettiez "embankment=yes" sur un chemin avec également un élément séparé "man_made=embankment". Bonne journée!
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-02-14 15:51:03+00:00): Je prends note de ta remarque, merci ! Je pense pas l'avoir refaite souvent celle-là.
andergrin (2020-09-17 08:29:13+00:00): Доброго дня. Теги для позначення криниці man_made=water_well
eggie (2020-09-17 05:17:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Mocht hier een bedrijf zitten met de naam Goeiemorgen dan kun je die het beste bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode. Ook de aard van het bedrijf bijtaggen voor het juiste symbool. Bv shop=beauty
Je zult anders in OSM niets zien. 
Geef in je upload commentaar concreet aan wat je hebt toegevoegd.
Kijk je nog even.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeauty
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 05:39:25+00:00): Het bedrijf Goeiemorgen is niet bekend bij de K v K.
Bij geen reactie zal ik de bijdrage verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Jemerai (2020-09-17 05:43:34+00:00): Klopt, het is een lokale plek
eggie (2020-09-17 05:57:07+00:00): Dag Jeroen... in dat geval de node leegmaken op de omtrek van de woning ....en op de adresnode bijtaggen. Zie aanwijzing boven.
Dan zul je de naam en een symbool zien na redering
Succes..
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 05:09:43+00:00): Beste Maarten,
Routerelaties bewerken met een simpele editor als iD geeft bijna altijd schade.
De volgorde van de routedelen raakt zoek.
Gebruik daarom editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     

Kijk ook nog even in het forumdraadje  wat ervaren mappers inbrengen betreffende rail en grenzen.
Sebastic onderhoudt de grenzen. 
Het lijkt allemaal zo simpel en logisch, maar dat is het zeker niet.  

MVG,
Eggie
DanGlover (2020-09-18 09:23:09+00:00): Hi Rob - if you're still in LL20...  The letter box on Bache Mill Road should be LL20 176 according to RM data.  Is this another where they've fitted the wrong "collection plate"?
robbieonsea (2020-09-18 22:19:37+00:00): Fixed. It is 176, I didn't read my my own notes properly!
Thanks for the heads up.
PavolG (2021-01-02 20:57:46+00:00): Ahoj, opravil som ti kopu novych domov nad ulicou K Surdoku. Neviem odkial si mal polohu a velkost budov, ale boli posunute prakticky o ulicu mimo a asi 2x tak velke...
Ako zdroj mas uvedeny Bing, na nom vsak polovica domov este nie ja ani postavena a poloha aj velkost suhlasi s mojou opravou.
Jany48 (2021-05-13 20:34:22+00:00): PavolG, aj ja som musel už veľa vecí po ňom opravovať, namiesto toho, aby som sa venoval iným veciam v mape... Vidím niečo nesprávne zakreslené alebo otagované, pozriem sa, kto to zmenil a zase je tam infitter. Či už názvy lesných ciest na Kvašnej vode, alebo historické (neexistujúce) názvy sídlisk.
PavolG (2021-05-13 21:01:38+00:00): Hej vidim, v poslednom update zrobil zo starej vodarne historicky palac...
user_8334278 (2020-09-17 00:23:13+00:00): the line on the north side is deerfield not northbrook.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-06 23:53:01+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11634333

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
❤️‍🔥 (2020-09-20 08:11:45+00:00): You renamed the hamlet "Kuratau Junction" to "Kuratau", but I think that's wrong, Kuratau is the lakeside village here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1448689686
NyanSten (2020-09-21 07:36:00+00:00): I was taking it from the address nodes there, e.g. the building at the junction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5631377508
or the school nearby:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5631375714
NyanSten (2020-09-21 07:42:30+00:00): But now I can see in LINZ Gazeteer that it's a part of Kuratau called Kuratau Junction. I will put it back. Thanks for noticing.
mariotomo (2020-12-10 22:03:27+00:00): hola, no me acuerdo si te he invitado al grupo telegram en que los maperos de Panamá nos tenemos en contacto, o si prefieres escribir en el foro #61.  me comentas, te envío los enlaces.
Joseph E (2020-11-01 04:42:30+00:00): I would recommend creating small areas formed with closed ways, rather than the huge multipolygons with over 1000 members (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11634595) - these huge relations will be hard to maintain and easy to break. Also, the woodland does not continue across roads, so it would be better to cut out the areas along roads which do not have trees. This alone would cut the areas into smaller, manageble pieces, and often it won’t be necessary to create a multipolygon instead of just using a closed way.
MKnight (2020-09-17 07:51:55+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier reichlich Wege gelöscht, warum?
Cor! (2020-09-17 10:03:08+00:00): Hallo MKnight,
da hatte der ursprüngliche Mapper mehr Wert auf Aussehen als auf Praktikabilität gelegt. Z.B. waren ca 170 Stellplätze auf einem Parkplatz angelegt, aber ohne Kapazitätsangabe (weder in den Stellplätzen, noch im Parkplatz) und da nicht nach normalen und behindertengerechten Stellplätzen unterschieden wurde und auch Aufbauten (Dächer) ignoriert wurden, habe ich die zugunsten der gesamten Fläche entfernt. 
Weiterhin gab es "Fußgängerzonen", die keine waren, sondern einfach öffentlicher Raum zwischen Straßen und Häuser. Wege waren trotzdem eingezeichnet. Es fehlten die verbindungen, weshalb Fehler entstanden.
Ich muss da demnächst noch deutlich mehr aufräumen und korrigieren, als Geodät hat man da anscheinend einen nüchterneren Blick. ;)
MKnight (2020-09-17 10:35:11+00:00): ok, danke.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:50:24+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Warin61 (2020-10-29 07:20:35+00:00): Hi
Removal of the outer way 318672900 for this tree area has also stopped it being rendered. 

Restored.
Mahdi Aghashiri (2020-09-23 14:58:52+00:00): باسلام. لطفا از نامهای رسمی استفاده نمایید و از ایجاد سلیقه شخصی خودداری نمایید. باتشکر
JasonBob (2022-10-11 03:48:46+00:00): Do you have a concrete source for this name? Because it is not known as Seaplane Way, it is Lindbergh Field Way. This is how it is currently signposted. If a road does not have signage, you shouldn't make up your own name for it.
SomeoneElse (2023-06-21 23:31:22+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848265422 here, but it seems to be mostly a duplicate of part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32553304 .
I'll tidy it up, but please do try and be careful!
Best Regards,
Andy
pachpora (2023-06-26 04:23:39+00:00): Hi Andy, 

Thank you reviewing the changeset and for making necessary corrections. We will make sure to give the editor the necessary feedback to avoid creation of duplicates segments at intersection and at juctions. 

Regards,
pachpora
JasonBob (2022-10-11 04:02:34+00:00): Besides a historic use of this area for seaplane landings, what is the basis for naming this area Seaplane Cove? I have been unable to find formal references to it named as such. Unless it is a genuine place name I don't think we should be in the business of making our own names.
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:07:17+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
gnischa (2021-02-15 08:26:49+00:00): Hi Allison,
Thanks for looking into my edit. I apologize for the miss from my end. I have modified the access to customers. (Changeset:99273954) 

Regards,
gnischa
DP24PH (2020-09-17 06:46:26+00:00): It seems that the route you're trying to compose might resulted to erratic edit, thus affecting certain roadways. Emergency reversion will commence in a few moments, and I'll be back with you.
DP24PH (2020-09-17 07:34:47+00:00): Upon verification, you might be unaware about the route relations on your iD editor.

To do this, select first the way segment, then select (new relation) on the drop-down menu, then select route -> bus for all PUV routes (Bus, Jeepney, UV Express). More information will be sent over OSM DM.
ralley (2020-09-17 10:39:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing up the building outline but why have you removed the hospital tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91019989
Nij4t2 (2020-09-17 11:39:38+00:00): From aerial / satellite imagery I could see it was a building but I could not find a source for it being a hospital... ok... I now see the reference to the hospital at: https://www.selwynfoundation.org.nz/villages/residential-care/selwyn-village/living-options/
My apologies!
ralley (2020-09-17 17:53:39+00:00): No worries, thanks for fixing
mavl (2020-09-21 16:59:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:59:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:50:43+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
stlmapper74 (2020-09-19 19:26:08+00:00): Just curious, is this from local knowledge?
mohapd (2020-09-21 07:33:55+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response, we mostly rely on satellite images and street level images to make edits. This edit went slightly wrong, we will correct it based on private Maxar imagery available to us. We observed you have added name Mulberry Lane to residential road, but the point feature is contradicting with the name https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402248705 and says house is Duello Road. We believe this road  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848281113 is driveway/shared driveway. Please share your thoughts so that we can proceed to edit the segment.  
Regards,
mohapd.
stlmapper74 (2020-09-21 09:59:23+00:00): Yes, it appears to be a driveway.