piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mjholtkamp (2017-04-07 14:43:40+00:00): Hey eggie, bedankt voor het commentaar. Ik ben inderdaad nieuw en dit was mijn eerste edit. Ik zal de links die je stuurde doorlezen.

Verhelderend van het lopen over een fietspad, ik was me daar niet bewust van. Ik zal het onthouden.

De reden dat ik een aanpassing wilde maken is omdat ik een fietsroute wilde plannen over de brug, maar de routeplanner vermijdde deze brug.

Omdat de brug nog maar net is open gegaan vermoedde ik dat de brug nog een status 'in aanbouw' had of iets dergelijks, dus ik ging kijken. Ik kon niks vinden, behalve het voetpad. Deze had ik aangezet omdat er naast het fietspad ook een voetpad is. Maar het is nu duidelijk dat dat verkeerd was :)

Weet jij waarom de routeplanner de brug nog vermijdt (zelfs als je 'fiets' selecteert)?

Alvast bedankt!
mjholtkamp (2017-04-07 14:45:26+00:00): Hmmm, ik probeerde het net en nu werkt het wel. Eerst probeerde ik het op mijn telefoon en nu op laptop, misschien dat dat het was, of ik deed iets verkeerd.

In ieder geval werkt het nu! :)
eggie (2017-04-07 17:56:35+00:00): Dag MJ Holtkamp.. Dat de routeplanner het niet deed komt omdat de updates in de routeplanners achterlopen bij het verwerken van de edits. Bij sommige apps kan dat wel meer dan een week zijn. 
Inderdaad via graphHopper in de mapnik werkt het
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.0874%2C5.0840%3B52.0868%2C5.0732#map=17/52.08738/5.07871
Mr_Brown (2017-04-04 01:40:54+00:00): Thanks for helping out. :)
SomeoneElse (2017-04-04 21:02:13+00:00): Oops (again) :)
srividya_c (2017-04-05 05:41:35+00:00): Hi kb624,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your contribution. 

In this edit, looks like you have added a construction site for hospital. But there are also buildings overlapping the construction site. Can you please verify whether those buildings exists? If not, can you please delete it.

Thank you 
Srividya
kb624 (2017-04-05 11:39:00+00:00): Hi Srividya,

Yes buildings 515,517,519 (+rear) ,521 (+rear), 523, 512, 510, 506, 504, 502, 548, 540 and 536 are all gone. Thanks for clarifying
srividya_c (2017-04-07 05:17:29+00:00): Thank you for the update kb624. 

Can you please delete the buildings inside the construction area and update the map.

Thanks
mueschel (2017-04-04 17:18:08+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could you have a look and fix this?
Jan
NicoVargas (2017-04-04 23:15:20+00:00): Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using. 

numero_pis=1 (# of floors )
numero_sot=0 (# of basement)
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)
tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)

This issue maybe remains, because I couldn't fix it because i was working in a map needed to the field work. If you could fix it, awesome :)

Best regards
mueschel (2017-04-05 17:07:11+00:00): Hi,
I can change the  numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
NicoVargas (2017-04-05 17:34:30+00:00): Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
mueschel (2017-04-05 18:48:45+00:00): Ok, did in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023
manoharuss (2017-04-04 09:42:40+00:00): Hi JeraldCarter,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. Instead of adding leisure=playground, you can map the area and add the playground which depicts the place much more accurately.

Thanks,

Manohar
JeraldCarter (2017-04-04 18:00:48+00:00): Thanks for the tip!
woodpeck (2017-04-04 08:46:23+00:00): Hello Zowie Polie, this changeset deletes a lot of valid data. Maybe you are not aware that your edits actually affect every user of OSM, not just the map you are seeing. Please stop breaking the map.
nammala (2017-06-06 07:30:44+00:00): Hi ,

Noticed that you have deleted major highways which is not appropriate and kind of vandalism and make sure that you add valuable data to the map . OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the real map of the world and any data we add should be ground truth not deleting valuable data. I reverted the changeset. Please dont repeat it again.

Regards,
nammala
imagico (2017-04-04 10:20:17+00:00): Hello Sandro,

your edits to Остров Кверини are factually incorrect, please revert them.

If you do not have reliable data or are not able to reliably interpret the data you have you cannot edit in this area.

Also note you have unnecessarily created five new versions of this island within a few hours:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240306213/history

but at the same time combine several unrelated edits far apart in this changeset and others.  Stop doing that, you are causing a lot of trouble and unnecessary work for your fellow mappers.
Sandro Alex (2017-04-04 22:06:59+00:00): Hi Imagico,

I edited the island to reflect the original geometry per your suggestion.  Sorry about the changesets.  I didn't realize that this was causing problems.
Jojo4u (2017-04-04 18:11:13+00:00): Danke! War schon spät abends -.-
Mapeiro (2017-04-04 02:12:21+00:00): Você pode traçar estradas clicando no botão "Linha" e então clicando ao longo da estrada que aparece na foto de satélite. Depois é escolher a classificação da via (nesse caso uma estrava vicinal). Fiz isso para a Estrada Covanka agora.
DD1GJ (2017-04-04 05:48:38+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
Alan (2017-04-04 04:29:30+00:00): Interesting! But where's the river? I see you mapped a lake that has "river" in the name, so I'm a bit confused!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-04-19 21:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47952690 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional edits reported to the DWG.  A previous attempt to contact the mapper (see https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266) failed.  Edits included an urban glacier: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-04-19 21:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47952690 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional edits reported to the DWG.  A previous attempt to contact the mapper (see https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266) failed.  Edits included an urban glacier: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-04-19 21:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47952690 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional edits reported to the DWG.  A previous attempt to contact the mapper (see https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266) failed.  Edits included an urban glacier: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47429266
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 06:17:47+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 06:17:07+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 12:06:47+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 12:06:52+00:00): numbers of historic dates in street in italy names are in roman numbers like this case. go there and check it out. vandalizing OSM. stop vandalizing OSM and stalking
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 06:15:49+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
highflyer74 (2017-04-07 11:27:13+00:00): Hallo Lars!

Ist dies dies der offizielle Name der Grünfläche? Sei so nett, kurz ein Feedback zu geben. Danke!
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 06:06:15+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
dgitto (2017-04-04 06:56:05+00:00): Is not a revert. Please reply. Is wrong "scuola secondaria" because they are two very different type of school. Do you known in provincia di Messina they are ALl mapped according to one standard?
mxrev8 (2017-04-04 10:41:37+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
priyaboya (2019-04-29 13:13:19+00:00): Hi Fadlilaa,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 29093166 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
As of now correcting the data.Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Glassman (2017-04-04 05:26:46+00:00): Not sure what you are trying to accomplish. There isn't a park around a private residence. Berthusen Park is already tagged. I reverted you edits. I'll send you a PM on how you can contribute.
DD1GJ (2017-04-04 05:47:53+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
connium (2017-04-04 18:27:09+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,
Danke für Deine Reaktion.
Nach dem Lesen des verlinkten Foreneintrags bin ich der Meinung, dass es am Besten ist, wenn Du meine Änderungen rückgängig machst und ich trage sie dann mit einem anderen Editor noch mal in einem Changeset ein.
DD1GJ (2017-04-04 18:45:53+00:00): Hallo connium, Deine Edits können so bleiben wie sie sind. Die App verhält sich momentan wie ein Supermarktkassierer, der nach jedem Artikel einen Kassenzettel druckt, Geld will und Dir das Rückgeld gibt. Zuhause hast Du dann zwar auch alle Einkäufe, aber es ist verdammt schwierig nachzukontrollieren, ob alles stimmt.
DD1GJ (2017-04-04 06:25:44+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
BCNorwich (2017-04-04 07:11:54+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I amended your tags for name, opening-hours and description to conform to OSM best practice. Regards
DD1GJ (2017-04-04 06:24:13+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
FTA (2017-04-06 03:57:10+00:00): Hi orangelemonjelly,

I am adding a comment on changesets that have modified this area recently as there seems to be a dispute about naming. OSM follows a few guidelines as it relates to disputed territories, which can generally be found in http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Based on some research from the web, it seems that there is South Korean settlement on these islands that represents the on the ground situation.

However, names in other languages, such as name:en, should not necessarily be the simple transliteration of the word. In the case of English, wikipedia points to the name "Liancourt Rocks" as the neutral English word to refer to the islands. A good example of this naming versus transliteration issue is Japan's name. "日本" is "Nippon", yet the English language uses the name "Japan".

We should take care not to edit over each other back and forth but rather strive towards a consensus. In this case, I think with the use of "alt_name:*" tags in addition to the "name:*" tags, we can represent many of the different view points in this situation. Of course, this does not stop anyone from using the data on their own website modified as they see fit either.

My proposal is that we add the neutral names to tags such as "name:en". (The English language Wikipedia in fact greatly favors the use if Liancourt Rocks when discussing this area as well as the disputed situation at hand.) Then tags such as "alt_name:en" can store transliterations. By doing so, we can represent the differing viewpoints. What are your thoughts on this? 

Best Regards,
Ethan aka FTA with the OSMF Data Working Group

기계 번역

안녕하세요 orangelemonjelly,

최근에이 영역을 수정 한 changesets에 대한 주석을 추가하고 있습니다. 이름 지정에 관한 분쟁이있는 것 같습니다. OSM은 일반적으로 http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf에서 확인할 수있는 분쟁 지역과 관련된 몇 가지 지침을 따릅니다. 웹의 일부 연구를 토대로 볼 때이 섬에 한국 정착지가있어 현장 상황을 대표하는 것으로 보인다.

그러나 name : en과 같은 다른 언어의 이름은 단어의 단순한 음역 일 필요는 없습니다. 영어의 경우 wikipedia는 아일랜드를 가리키는 중립 영어 단어로 "Liancourt Rocks"라는 이름을 가리 킵니다. 이 이름 지정과 음역 문제의 좋은 예는 일본 이름입니다. "일본"은 "일본"이지만 영어는 "일본"이라는 이름을 사용합니다.

우리는 서로 앞뒤로 편집하지 말고 합의를 향해 노력해야합니다. 이 경우, "name : *"태그 이외에 "alt_name : *"태그를 사용하면이 상황에서 여러 가지 다른 관점을 나타낼 수 있다고 생각합니다. 물론, 이것은 누구도 자신들의 웹 사이트에서 데이터를 사용하는 것을 수정하지 않습니다.

내 제안은 "name : en"과 같은 태그에 중립적 인 이름을 추가하는 것입니다. Liancourt Rocks가 논쟁의 여지가있는 상황과이 영역에 대해 논의 할 때 영어권 위키 피 디아는 실제로 사용을 크게 선호합니다. "alt_name : en"과 같은 태그는 음역을 저장할 수 있습니다. 이렇게함으로써, 우리는 다른 관점을 나타낼 수 있습니다. 이것에 대한 당신의 생각은 무엇입니까?

친애하는,
Ethan 일명 OSMF 데이터 작업반과의 FTA
mapping man (2017-04-04 09:32:51+00:00): Hi BCNorwich.  Just to let you know that there is a small public garden in that POI location.   It is paved with an ornamental shrubbery in the centre and benches in a circular pattern on the outside.
FTA (2017-04-06 03:57:36+00:00): Hi kyosyo,

I am adding a comment on changesets that have modified this area recently as there seems to be a dispute about naming. OSM follows a few guidelines as it relates to disputed territories, which can generally be found in http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Based on some research from the web, it seems that there is South Korean settlement on these islands that represents the on the ground situation.

However, names in other languages, such as name:en, should not necessarily be the simple transliteration of the word. In the case of English, wikipedia points to the name "Liancourt Rocks" as the neutral English word to refer to the islands. A good example of this naming versus transliteration issue is Japan's name. "日本" is "Nippon", yet the English language uses the name "Japan".

We should take care not to edit over each other back and forth but rather strive towards a consensus. In this case, I think with the use of "alt_name:*" tags in addition to the "name:*" tags, we can represent many of the different view points in this situation. Of course, this does not stop anyone from using the data on their own website modified as they see fit either.

My proposal is that we add the neutral names to tags such as "name:en". (The English Wikipedia in fact greatly favors the use if Liancourt Rocks when discussing this area as well as the disputed situation at hand.) Then tags such as "alt_name:en" can store transliterations. By doing so, we can represent the differing viewpoints. What are your thoughts on this? 

Best Regards,
Ethan aka FTA with the OSMF Data Working Group

機械翻訳

こんにちは、

私は最近、このエリアを変更したチェンジセットに、名前付けに関する紛争があるように思われるコメントを追加しています。 OSMは、紛争地域に関連するため、いくつかのガイドラインに従います。一般にhttp://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdfに掲載されています。ウェブからのいくつかの調査に基づいて、地方の状況を表すこれらの島々には韓国の和解があるようだ。

しかし、他の言語の名前（例：name：en）は、単語の単純な翻字である必要はありません。英語の場合、ウィキペディアは中立的な英語の単語として "Liancourt Rocks"という名前を指しています。この命名と音訳の問題の良い例は、日本の名前です。 "日本"は "日本"ですが、英語は "日本"という名前です。

私たちはお互いに前後に編集するのではなく、むしろコンセンサスに向かって努力しなければならない。この場合、 "name：*"タグに加えて "alt_name：*"タグを使用すると、この状況でさまざまな視点の多くを表すことができます。もちろん、これにより、誰も自分のウェブサイト上のデータを使用することができなくなることはありません。

私の提案は、 "name：en"のようなタグにニュートラル名を追加することです。 Liancourt Rocksがこの分野について議論しているときには、Wikipediaの英語の方が実際には好意的です。 "alt_name：en"のようなタグは、翻字を保存することができます。こうすることで、異なる視点を表現することができます。これについてのあなたの考えは何ですか？

宜しくお願いします、
Ethan別名FTAとOSMFデータワーキンググループ
kyosyo (2017-04-06 05:38:25+00:00): Hi! I appreciate that I get a message from you.
I understand it as having had the inquiry of my opinion about the matter of "Liancourt Rocks".
I recognize below it in Japanese so that my opinion does not come by my poor English by mistake.
「Liancourt Rocks」に於いては、韓国大統領・李承晩の時代に韓国政府による国際慣例違反の不法占拠が行われました。爾来、日本国と大韓民国において、紛争地・係争地となっております。
しかしながら、
わたくしは、OpenStreetMapの公正明大の精神から、通常表記は国際海洋地図言語「en」で記載するべきであり。朝鮮語（韓国語）表記は「ko」、日本語表記は「Ja」で表示するものとして、当該の地名変更をいたしました。
例）．「name:en=Liancourt Rocks」、「name:ko=독도」、「name:ja=竹島（Takeshima）」
また、ソースとして日本語Wikipedia該当ページを引証いたしました。
しかしながら、現在は、別な表示になっております。
例）．「alt_name:en=Dokuto」、「name:Dokuto Island」、「name:ko=독도」、「name:ja=独島（これは독도の日本語表記で、竹島ではありません。）」
私は、この事はOpenStreetMapの精神に反する由々しき事態であると訴えます。

私は、OpenStreetMapの公正明大の精神から、通常表記は国際海洋地図の表記を「英語」で記載するべきであると訴えます。韓国の地名表記は「name:ko」、日本国の地名表記は「name:Ja」で表示するものであり、他国民に自国の名称による表記を強制するべきではないという考えです。

敬具

高島　匡尚
TAKASHIMA　Tadataka
kyosyo@msn.com
FTA (2017-04-06 14:52:06+00:00): Thank you very much for your feedback. I am talking with other users in the area and hope we can come to an amicable solution that is indeed fair and represents many sides.
Best Regards,
Ethan
自動翻訳
皆さんのご意見をありがとうございます。 私はその地域の他のユーザーと話しており、私たちが本当に公正で多くの面を代表する優しいソリューションになることを願っています。
宜しくお願いします、
イーサン