piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2015-07-27 20:53:50+00:00): Existiert dieses Schifffahrtszeichen nicht mehr oder warum hast du es kommentarlos gelöscht? (Mit einer Begründung im Changeset-Kommentar wäre diese Nachfrage möglicherweise nicht notwendig gewesen)
Ulwe (2015-07-30 08:05:28+00:00): Sorry, aber bei mir erschien der Punkt im Wald . Dort aber ist ein Wasser und Schifffahrtszeichen bedeutungslos.
Nakaner (2015-07-30 21:56:14+00:00): Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz revertiert. Ich kenne (obwohl ich keine Ahnung von der Schifffahrt habe) genug Schifffahrtszeichen, die am Ufer stehen.
Nakaner (2015-07-30 21:57:01+00:00): Weil einem ein Objekt "bedeutungslos" erscheint, ist das trotzdem kein Grund, es zu löschen. Spätestens wenn man so etwas absichtlich macht, kann man von Vandalismus reden!
acsd (2015-08-14 20:46:09+00:00): Кольцо на пересечении Университетской и Центральной не односторонняя?
vladon (2015-08-16 17:46:33+00:00): Сейчас нет. Станет односторонним - поменяем.
Jose Riha (2015-07-29 06:26:52+00:00): tipujem, ze ulica je Kukučínova a nie Kukučínová (rytmicke kratenie). pozor na preklep v addr:housenumber (pomlcka miesto lomky).
Protoxenus (2023-10-20 09:19:31+00:00):  https://osm.org/​node/​3668954870 
 https://osm.org/​node/​307440231
 https://osm.org/​node/​1312035436
maciek-szn (2015-07-27 17:49:52+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby dodawania zakazu skrętu w lewo "pod prąd". Żadna nawigacja i tak pod prąd nie poprowadzi.
d3mol3k (2015-07-27 18:46:08+00:00): I tu trochę bym się nie zgodził. Bo znam nawigacje które to robią mimo iż ulica jest jednokierunkowa. Co prawda na mapach E-MAPY. Dokładnie chodzi mi o skręt z ulicy Lelewela w Łukasińskiego :). Uparcie tłuką. Muszę sprawdzić jak jest na mapach opartych na tej. Ale dziękuję za uwagę. Odezwę się jak sprawdzę.
maciek-szn (2015-07-27 21:30:35+00:00): Kiepska nawigacja w takim razie ;-) Jeśli ignoruje jednokierunkowość ulicy, to pewnie tym bardziej zignoruje zakaz skrętu.
Stereo (2015-07-27 23:03:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Are these the actual names on the bus stops, and/or those used on mobiliteit.lu?
drkarsti (2015-07-28 06:13:54+00:00): Hi, for "Michel Rodange" and "Etats-Unis" the names are written on a black on white sign, which is at the bus stop post. For "Ste Zithe" it is only mentioned on the schedule of the line 19, which is going there. This should be the same as on mobiliteit.lu, but I went to all the bus stops myself to check them.
GerdP (2015-10-14 17:00:33+00:00): please review:
what does a tag like 
highway=rd no.6
mean?
andygol (2015-10-14 17:19:24+00:00): Hi, GerdP
I did not change the name of the road. I have no idea what it could be. It is necessary to check the history of the objects. There was a "Unconnected major disaster in Hyderabad"
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3423533/8672184/a42eb4e6-2a49-11e5-883c-066405071937.png and I fixed it along with other OSMers http://tasks.openstreetmap.in/project/28. If you have any information about the name of this road - please correct the title of the road. 
Best regards
GerdP (2015-10-14 17:24:40+00:00): I have no idea about the names, I found some similar tags in taginfo. 
In many cases, one has used 
highway=xyz instead of
highway=residential + name=xyz
Looking at the picture in your reply
I guess it is okay to assume that these
are not names, but the result of a  messed up import
im
andygol (2015-10-14 17:33:38+00:00): I found only one way with tag "highway=rd no.6" - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355709132 via http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/c1v

I think that this line can be removed
GerdP (2015-10-14 17:42:03+00:00): I've recently changed a few like that, 
see e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34637134
I think the ways are residential roads,
but I'll remove the name tag
Jose Riha (2015-07-29 06:22:03+00:00): pri uvadzani adries prosim postupovat podla http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov

dakujem! jose
Alecs01 (2015-07-27 19:14:40+00:00): nice details, thanks!
Rene Tran-Guillot (2015-07-28 04:38:38+00:00): You're welcome Alecs01, it's my pleasure! I traveled to Torre Bianche to work at my company branch office for just one single day, but it was great to do some little mapping after work-time! :-)
edgrmdna (2015-07-27 18:29:23+00:00): *Wade Drive*
Skippern (2015-07-27 18:50:18+00:00): Jhonny,

Mais uma dica: favor não use nomes genéricos, como "Ginásio" no num ginásio, ja e identificada pelo leisure=sports_centre
GerdP (2015-10-31 11:07:07+00:00): please review way 356368085:
is it meant to connect the two ways
356368086 and 361795784 ? The tag highway=junction is rarely used.
Govanus (2015-10-31 17:29:26+00:00): I'm looking at where I left that I remeber it was something with implementing an advanced stop line in a way that worked with a road lineing in the wiki I'm not sure if it was finished.  I think it was a puzel I decided probably after this edit by altering the width of the junction defined space to allow the passing lane not to get mixed up in the stop line under the lining scheme but then shortly afterward someone pointed out the routing line based in carrageway lane definition and modifing scheme in the wiki too and so I was thinking how to make them work together for these kind of renderes too.  I think the problem of ghost laneing and crossing lanes possiblly with some based on aditional subordinate routing lines to carry the lane detils like at some rounderbouts might need to be used in those places.

I think I was thinking to simplyfy the increaseingly confusing system by possibley going the whole way to areaising each lane!, and with the junction shrink basicly being a fudge anyway I decided that I'd make the space (on one side only maybe (k-point rules might note have allowed)) a type junction and maybe use some extension to the lane definition system to specificly handle this common feature.
   When I looked into the lane definition and change scheme there seemed a lot of parts that had been thought though and I thought I might be able to learn a lot  this and then make it fit.
  After spending a lot of time on this train of reasurce I needed to to some other areas so left this for now with the junction state that indicates that a junction feature exsists in that part of the road, which is true.  Holywell street was had to see at the time to get a good ariel alignment and so I probaly thought I'd sort out parks rd before trying other junctions.

I stopped short of linking well with Broad street as I couldn't get the two parts to line up as they were drwn with different offsets and some of the local buildings have also been out of alignment too.

As my key focus was further up the Parks rd I left this southern end in a good state for the other contributers of areas near here to join there future efforts to if  hadn't eventualy come back to it.  The the steps and ramp that where new at that time were neatly avoided by all so far:- see the north sidewalk(pavement) of broadstreet coming to a early stop. Incedently you can also see the offset of the weston libray by look at the sidwalk(pavement) thats rounded at a high definition to the most easterly corner neast the junction where discusing.
   I think if I get back to this junction I'd eventually get the signs, street lamps, wall lights, [indoor lights], traffic lights, surface types and colours, lane and k-point attubute infomation, and the local buildings fully room defined and the tunnels plotted too  --before I thought it was a finished location.
Govanus (2015-10-31 17:32:59+00:00): for k-pint info read the following (this has expanded and began to be countrified since I put into the diary about the time I drew the junction.  so its likely we could submit a uk advanced stop line feature to this):-

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area
GerdP (2015-10-31 17:42:58+00:00): and the answer to my question is ?
Govanus (2015-10-31 17:43:13+00:00): This is a new one on me (it pays to keep reading an evolveing manual!):-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison

This I think is less specific but sets a case for it more:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist

This is the one I was pointed too I think it talkes varations along the road and lane featurediscrption colours widtihs and surfaceing witch can be useful in oxford and other british places I map with special surface treatments being common to highlight the lanes modal use.:- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes

and find the last page I could quickly find on the subject:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

There are common themes and finding time to work thourgh and learn them all and come up with a unified initial implementation is something I need to do in the ner future.  But time has run out again here mainly just answering this ;) so it'll have to wait a bit more.
Govanus (2015-10-31 17:46:33+00:00): just got your reply in the refreash is yes think of it like this you have the normal road on the northside the cyclespace in the feature and then after the second stop line on the south of the feature is the reast of the normal traffic-light controled junction.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-31 18:18:00+00:00): I genuinely have no idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356368085 is supposed to be, and I was there only a few months ago.
GerdP (2015-11-01 07:22:06+00:00): :-)
The explanation (?) did not help me as well, 
it seems to describe everything around this small part of a normal looking road, but not the tag highway=junction.
Anyhow, I'm about to give up asking, it seems that you (Govanus) have your very own view of things, I think of you as an artist who uses OSM like a brush to draw pictures.
Govanus (2015-11-01 18:53:34+00:00): :->

Hmm I guess such an evolving wiki big enough to get lost in. 

I think I reserved the space as a second junction next to the other to allow for some method of getting two stop lines automaticaly produced but lost direction half way through so thought I'd come back when I had figured it out.

I simple terms all traffific stops at a stop lie except cyles that pass the other traffic to get ahead for safty and stop at the following stop line (its an overkill in that location but it was probably a popular choice with the cycle lobby!
Govanus (2015-11-01 18:54:23+00:00): haveing said all that I'd better check it is still there!
Govanus (2015-11-02 19:44:07+00:00): Ok I checked it is still there.  Theres only one advanced stop line on this junction; so thats why I only drew one.
  There are some more examples along the A420 nearby but they have yet to reach OSM yet.

Two last explination links then I'll discrib the lane pattern:-
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121107103953/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tpm/tal/cyclefacilities/advancedstoplines.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_stop_line

They seem quite common now so OSM should develop a tagging solution for them it this type of situation of areaise'ing

Ok starting at the parking bay at staircase 9 the lanes arn't painted (for economy) but the bay outline is and there is a small disabled patch just before the end (something for later) now when the sidwalk expands out and on-sidewalk cycle parking begins their is a start of a cycle lane on the parking side only.
then a few meters before our feature a warning centre line (ie originaly warning its more risky to overtake here but used everywhere at points to stop or giveway). so now you have three painted lanes the middle lane stops with a stop line on the north face of the feature. in the box the east lane passes the stoping middle lane without a line or symbol and then takes up both lanes. a nice explination cycle symbol is square in the middle of the box in the direction of the travel. Now US Sharrows don't exsist in UK road lining and so the symbol carries no extra meaning about road placement and is just like writing a sign on the street.
At the south face of the feature there is a stop line only in front of the new wide east lane afterwhich the main juction space exsits.
I think I was thinking the mini junction made some sence if you imagine it to be two sucsessive stop juncutions but it is a fudge as a highway=junction is supposed to be an envelope orignaly devised to act a relation free container of all the elements found in named junctions were the space gets a name like carfax (hmm I might just check thats named in miniute).

Now the homework for anyone taking up the chalenge is to lookat all of the above and its links and figgure out how it should all get tagged so all those end userss described get something working automaticaly.
Govanus (2015-11-02 20:30:00+00:00): I passed this to help to see if others have a standard solution already the link is https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/46307/how-do-you-tag-an-advanced-cycle-stop-line-or-cycle-box-at-traffic-lights-uk-style
Govanus (2015-11-02 21:09:19+00:00): I found a nice picture:-
http://ak.t2.tiles.virtualearth.net/tiles/o03131311220-3151-20-114?g=4441
muralito (2015-07-28 00:02:53+00:00): Hola. Les conviene poner que tipo de elemento es, asociacion, ONG, etc, ademas de direccion, telefono, etc para que sea mas util y encontrable la informacion. Cualquier duda pregunten.
OSchlüter (2015-07-28 15:55:23+00:00): Moin Buntbart
Die Werte für Turnlanes bitte ohne Leerzeichen
Es gibt einen MapPaint Stil und eine Objektvorlage, dann sieht man die Spuren und Richtungspfeile schon in Josm.
MFG OSchlüter
Buntbart (2015-07-28 16:25:23+00:00): Hallo, 
danke für den Hinweis, bevor ich noch mehr vermurkse ;-)
Hab's korrigiert.
Gruß Buntbart
altoing (2015-08-05 17:18:30+00:00): Хм, тропа от Мордовой поляны до Старосемейкино что-то задублировалась...
romanshuvalov (2015-08-14 08:48:32+00:00): Это потому что я её нарисовал рядом с газопроводом, на котором кроме man_made=pipeline стоял еще и highway=track, который я не заметил. Сейчас сотру этот тэг, чтоб газопровод остался газопроводом, а дорога - дорогой.
Christopher (2017-07-06 20:10:59+00:00): Hallo Maper, 
du hast hier in Tannroda einige Adressen erfasst, die aber offensichtlich Meckfeld zuzuordnen sind. Ist zwar schon 2 Jahre her, aber vielleicht kannst du das ja entsprechend korrigieren. Ich habe dazu einen Hinweis unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1055389 geöffnet.
Christopher
JohnDoe23 (2015-08-16 21:30:53+00:00): Ich denke mal, bei den ganzen tourism=picnic_site rund um das Waldschmidthaus handelt es sich vielmehr um leisure=picnic_table ? 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table

Bzw. falls die Tische zum Restaurant dazugehören, sollten diese nicht als Picknicktisch getaggt werden.

Gruß
Jose Riha (2015-07-29 06:24:36+00:00): pri uvadzani adries prosim postupovat podla http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov

dakujem! jose
lezurdis (2015-07-28 13:58:56+00:00): Parece-me que um "split" é necessário para partir em bocados a linha :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98649715

É pouco provável que a rua é sempre chamada "Rua Pereira de Baixo" desde de Maçoida até A-dos-Ferreiros.
tutas1258 (2015-07-28 19:19:53+00:00): Sim, tens razão. Vou corrigir.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-29 23:03:03+00:00): Oops - something went a bit wrong here. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3669249923/history was at latitude 0, longitude 0 - I've deleted it.
GerdP (2015-10-21 10:00:29+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=motorway_signal
is rarely used. Maybe that is a traffic_sign=* ?
If yes, what sign?
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-10-21 10:36:48+00:00): It's a motorway signal that you find at the centre of the carriageway (http://www.cbrd.co.uk/articles/mixed-signals/matrix.shtml). If highway=motorway_signal is not the right way, then what tag would be better?
GerdP (2015-10-21 10:41:52+00:00): sorry, I am not an expert for traffic signs.
This node popped up in my list of unusual highway tags. As I said, traffic_sign=*
is the usual tag.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-10-21 10:50:17+00:00): Okay: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34774928

If you can find a better way later please let me know.
GerdP (2015-10-21 10:58:11+00:00): maybe you want to tag the meaning?
I still have no clear idea what the sign looks like, maybe destination=* :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-10-21 11:32:25+00:00): Hi, 


It's a UK motorway signal that tells drivers about the adverse condition of the road ahead. It does not give directions to any town, but it only tells drivers about the adverse condition of the road ahead when it is needed. Usually, they are blank when there are no adverse conditions.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-17 01:16:28+00:00): Muchas de estas carreteras no existen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3669263782
fkMohr (2020-06-21 16:19:05+00:00): Ist der Gletschergarten hier richtig positioniert? Ich denke, er befindet sich östlich der Luftseilbahn zum Trockenen Steg. Was bedeutet: "Schweizer Familie"? Er heißt doch "Gletschergarten Dossen".
Gruß Friedo
fkMohr (2020-06-21 16:43:51+00:00): Ein Picknikplatz oder eine Feuerstelle ist hier wohl, doch die Bezeichnung "Gletschergarten" verwirrt etwas.
Gruß Friedo
mathieuS (2020-06-22 06:24:47+00:00): Hallo Friedo,
Leider kann ich Ihre Fragen nicht beantworten. Ich habe diese Änderung vor fünf Jahren vorgenommen und bien seitdem nicht mehr hier gewesen.
Das Mapping ist jedoch ein iterativer Prozess. Wenn Sie die Qualität dessen, was ich getan habe, verbessern können, dann tun Sie es ohne anderes!
lezurdis (2015-07-28 13:35:51+00:00): É costume colocar o barrier=gate no nó da estrada onde se encontra a "barreira".

Em vez da linha :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362662017

Podes colocar um nó na linha : 

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292401815

A largura da barreira é implícita : a largura da estrada.
lezurdis (2015-07-28 13:42:03+00:00): As piscinas não parecem ser piscinas publicas, por isso deveriam ter um tag "access=private" ou "access=no" :

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming%20pool?uselang=en-US
muralito (2015-07-27 23:44:02+00:00): Por favor mas cuidado con las ediciones. Esta rompio los limites de Colonia del Sacramento.
Pakea (2015-07-28 00:09:26+00:00): Disculpas, en un primer momento pensé en un polígono repetido, pero mas tarde quise deshacer y no pude, disculpas nuevamente.
muralito (2015-07-28 00:14:46+00:00): No hay problema. Si precisas ayuda avisa en el foro.
Pakea (2015-07-28 00:19:18+00:00): Gracias por la buena onda
RoterEmil (2017-02-24 11:40:36+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang1946, diesen Eintrag werde ich löschen, da privat zu sein scheint. Falls "Wolfgang & Rosita" jedoch z.B. ein öffentliches Café sein sollte, kann es gerne aufgenommen werden!
Nakaner (2015-07-28 09:10:21+00:00): layer=0 ist unnötig, siehe JOSM-Validator
Kakaner (2015-07-28 10:48:39+00:00): Warum werden die Bahnsteigkanten von der Bahnsteigfläche überdeckt? Bei dem Bahnsteig 4/5 ist das nicht so. Liegt es an den unterschiedlichen id-Reihenfolgen?
Nakaner (2015-07-28 11:47:51+00:00): Weil man Bahnsteige anders mappt. Entweder als Fläche mit ref=4;5, heigth=0.14; surface=*, railway=platform, public_transport=platform, area=yes oder als Multipolygon, das diese Tags trägt (area=yes braucht man dann nicht) und railway=platform_edge, ref=5 an der Kante. Tipp: Schau dir mal Euskirchen oder Heilbronn Hbf an.

Wenn sowohl die Bahnsteigkante als auch die Fläche mit railway=platform getaggt sind, dann befinden sich dort zwei Bahnsteig.
neiljp (2015-08-05 14:00:28+00:00): Please explain how there is not a wall around here?
neiljp (2015-11-15 13:48:03+00:00): As far as I can tell, this does have a wall around it, so am adding this back in. Please comment if you believe this is inaccurate.
neiljp (2015-08-05 13:57:10+00:00): Normally pitch is associated with a specific area and sport; see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
For that reason I would suggest leisure=park is more appropriate. For comparison, the rectangle inside is marked as a leisure=pitch, and should probably have a non-grass surface tag from what I've seen from a distance.
neiljp (2015-08-05 13:50:01+00:00): By my understanding, this lane is not the Gibberie Wallie, but rather this refers to stonework/'fountain', possibly located in the fenced-off square area?
neiljp (2015-08-05 13:37:07+00:00): Thank you for trying to help, but the street tag and name are more relevant upon the school area - which already has a name and streetname.
If the issue is the alternative name (with 'primary') then this should be in an alt_name (alternative name) tag which allows for searching to find it, though perhaps it is debatable which is which in some cases. Please discuss if you wish, but I have cleaned up the duplicate name in changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33128315
Supaplex (2015-07-28 01:04:21+00:00): 還沒通車的車站不要標railway=station，用railway:construction=station免得混淆地圖使用者
muralito (2017-02-15 16:35:28+00:00): Victor, probablemente la maxima de 120 km/h no sea valida cuando se aproximas las rotondas u otros cruces. ¿Las relevaste personalmente y es efectivamente asi o son detalles a mejorar?
Víctor L (2017-02-17 04:17:46+00:00): Son detalles que me quedaron pendientes.
Ya lo arreglo.
wcedmisten (2023-06-03 18:51:38+00:00): Hello! I was wondering what just_eat=yes means in this Changeset.
wcedmisten (2023-06-03 18:52:04+00:00): Specifically looking at this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1082777246
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:44:50+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362697453,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362697454
have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:18:35+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59912677 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107782212
JonasSmedegaard (2015-09-09 11:24:54+00:00): 6 months ago the following command succeeded - nowit fails:

ogr2ogr --config OSM_USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING NO -nlt PROMOTE_TO_MULTI -f GeoJSON /vsistdout/ /vsicurl_streaming/http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/4221694/full multipolygons

ogr2ogr is part of Debian package gdal-bin.

Not sure what went wrong - or if the bug is at the parser or the data - but suspect your change (or one before that) has flaws...
Hjart (2015-09-21 11:39:35+00:00): Der er stadig et problem med Inderhavnen (som jeg spurgte om på postlisten for et stykke tid siden)
pfg21 (2015-07-28 09:31:06+00:00): а точно доступ на территорию больницы запрещен
я думаю там максимум acces=private
Tatoshka (2015-07-28 10:16:08+00:00): Я тоже так думал и навигатор так думал. а уперся в забор с замком.
Единственный вход это со стороны ул. гладкова. Въезд с осипова только служебный с открывание висячего замка на воротах.
d1g (2015-07-30 01:29:43+00:00): Чтобы навигатор понимал что это круглосуточный магазин нужно opening_hours=24/7 писать:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours#Примеры

Виды топлива пока хорошо не поддерживаются, но указывать можно для себя: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:fuel
Tatoshka (2015-07-31 10:56:44+00:00): На азс виды топлива  92, 92Е (экстрим), 95, 98, ДТЕ. Кто умеет добавьте)))
d1g (2015-07-31 16:19:18+00:00): В iD редакторе есть кнопка "все теги", туда можно любой тег ввести, главное на вики описание прочитать что тег значит.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3669700162
Littlebtc (2016-02-15 13:21:24+00:00): 我找到環差了

http://eiadoc.epa.gov.tw/eiaweb/Main3.aspx?func=10&hcode=1040073F

看起來是會靠近河堤並擴寬水頭屋大橋，所以我修正了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37224523
Scout Jens (2022-10-12 16:32:39+00:00): Hallo Junuz, die Aufteilung ist unnötig Kleinteilig.
Hjart (2015-08-02 07:17:12+00:00): Vær venligst opmærksom på at polygoner ikke må skære sig selv. Jeg har måttet rette et tilfælde her
geodreieck4711 (2015-07-29 06:36:38+00:00): please use only emergency=fire_hydrant
eggie (2018-09-30 12:55:20+00:00): Eerste edit buiten Nederland.. daardoor nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tomas_J (2024-03-02 14:33:56+00:00): Vstup sem je povolený
Tomas_J (2024-03-02 14:34:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62187007/history
przemas75 (2016-08-02 09:58:58+00:00): Dalej trwa remont Teatralnej?
szutkes (2016-08-02 12:34:37+00:00): W sumie, to nie remont Teatralnej a rozbudowa Teatru Wybrzeże o nowe sceny. Zamknięcie jest nadal i na obu wylotach ulicy jest płot.