piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cartographer10 (2020-11-13 06:58:16+00:00): Er was laatst een discussie hierover op het forum. Eigenlijk is er geen goede tag die dergelijke gemeente groen omschrijft maar natural=scrub komt er het dichtste bij. Vandaar dat ik die heb gebruikt. In dat forum post staat in een van de eerste posts ook een mooi overzicht van verschillende soortgelijke dingen
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=808131#p808131
Friendly_Ghost (2020-11-13 13:45:06+00:00): Dat overzicht is niet per se leidend, en er wordt ook gezegd dat natural=scrub alleen gebruikt wordt bij gebrek aan een beter geschikte landuse tag. Dat gezegd begrijp ik dat je voor natural=scrub kiest, en met deze context erbij vind ik het ook wel prima om het zo te laten.
Riemer17 (2020-11-13 07:10:41+00:00): As far as I can see everything looks fine. If you want to work with relations you have to edit in JOSM. In general JOSM is a better editor, it is more powerfull and it makes less mistakes than iD. I would greatly advise you to start working in JOSM if you want to continue with OpenStreetMap.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Guide
n76 (2020-11-13 16:11:37+00:00): Are you sure about this speed limit change? I drove on this "40 MPH" section through that intersection the other week and did not see any changed speed limits. It was still 45 MPH to the intersection of Vaquero, then 35 MPH continuing south/west on Los Mares.
berndw (2020-11-14 09:38:03+00:00): Hallo kaeru

Das ist das, was ich gefunden habe.
http://www.radtour4u.de/freizeitroute_ahr_rhein_eifel.php

In weit der aktuelle Verlauf stimmt kann ich nicht sagen, ich habe diesen Weg bewusst nie gesehen, mein Augenmerk lag eher an der Ahrroute und der RPL-Runde
catonano (2021-06-17 07:58:07+00:00): L'edificio che fu della banca d'italia adesso appartiene all'università di Bari ?
Fablab Taranto Makers (2021-06-17 09:58:37+00:00): In realtà credo appartenga alla ASL Taranto che lo ha dato in gestione alla Università di Bari. Tant'è vero che lo hanno utilizzato anche come hub vaccinale per un periodo.
catonano (2023-08-15 16:15:55+00:00): Sugo e Basilico siamo sicuri che si trovi lì?
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-04 11:23:20+00:00): Hi juf Carla,
in this CS you accidentally straightened two roads: 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94019020
The problem has been fixed, just be careful next time. 
One more advice: keep your changesets to smaller areas, and one topic. That helps  yourself to avoid mistakes, and others to analyse them. Describe what you want to achieve in the changeset comments, in addition to those hashtags.
 
DWG ticket 2021020310000165
VA00 (2023-03-29 18:35:16+00:00): Na pewno drewniany? Z A4 świeci się jak metalowy.
pan_borsuk (2023-03-30 00:42:40+00:00): https://www.strava.com/activities/4310793622

może jakieś zmiany zaszły.. jak widzisz/widziałeś w 2o2o :-P było bidnie :-D #brzoZZa
VA00 (2023-03-30 03:58:02+00:00): No to ewidentnie wymieniony, albo 2 postawili.
pan_borsuk (2023-03-30 08:56:26+00:00): mnie nie będzie prawie 3 tygodnie w pl tak że liczę na pogłębiony risercz :-)
Tractor (2020-11-13 06:24:20+00:00): Hei. Vær så snill og slutt med det du holder på med nå. Du endrer wikidatahenivsningen på noder for strøk i Oslo til å peke på den administrative bydelen. Du roter også til hierarkiet av stedsnavn i Oslo. Det er ikke slik at bare administrative bydeler skal ha place=suburb. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder
Tractor (2020-11-13 06:37:16+00:00): In case you don't speak Norwegian: Please stop what you're doing in Oslo. You're changing wikidata values so they point to different elements, you're moving the place nodes around and making a complete mess of the established hierarchy. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder
Tractor (2020-11-13 07:25:25+00:00): I've reverted most of your chagesets in Oslo. When I looked at them in more detail I saw that, regretfully, a lot of the changes you've done to the Oslo map over the last day or two can only be described as pure vandalism. One thing is that you've made a mess of the hierarchy. It's a lot worse that you've moved nodes that had been carefully placed in the correct spot  In a few hours you destroyed a lt of hard work done by other mappers.
kunyasobe (2020-11-13 08:19:11+00:00): Hei Tractor,
First of all, I regret that you believe my edits are vandalism. I have no reason to intentionally destroy others' work, and I think it is not correct to accuse me of something that serious lightly. However, I understand why my changes could be worrying for you. Even though I believe I am 100% in my right to reverse your changes back to my edits, I will abstain from doing so or from continuing to edit to explain what I am trying to do.
I have not created a mess, as you say, but instead, trying to fix the anarchy and lack of organization in Oslo's suburbs and neighborhoods. There is no distinction between different entities. A visual inspection of the map, as it is now, shows places like Frogner or Grünerløkka (bydeler) at the same hierarchy level as Bolteløkka or Meyerløkka. You can see that in Oslo's official maps, they are not labeled as similar entities (https://od2.pbe.oslo.kommune.no/kart).
I have been trying to set the Bydeler at the suburb level and the Delbydeler (https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/13206466-1490274686/Tjenester%20og%20tilbud/Politikk%20og%20administrasjon/Statistikk/Geografiske%20inndelinger/Delbydeler_20170214_A4.pdf) as quarters, following the guidelines of the same link you posted, places that do not show in the official map I was leaving as neighborhoods.
So, I think trying to improve details, in good faith, following official maps can not be considered vandalism. Since I would like the Oslo map to improve, and I think you can see the lack of organization now, I believe it is possible to reach some consensus on this topic? Maybe my mistake is to be too strict with the legal and official subdivisions in disregard of the daily use of names. Do you see any path to improvement? Do you agree that it is incorrect that every place node in Oslo is at the same level even if OSM offers different classification levels?
Kunyasobe
Tractor (2020-11-13 19:13:09+00:00): The Municipality of Oslo's administrative 'bydeler' do not follow the traditional subdivisions of the city and the names in ordinary use. They have devided the city into 'bydeler' for administrative purposes. The guidelines on the wiki page that I linked to, explicitly state that place=suburb is not the same as the administrative subdivision 'bydel'. The 'delbydeler' are used for statistical purposes. The names of the 'delbydeler' are just labels, not real place names. The 'delbydel' of Skullerud, for instance, is much larger than both the present day suburb of Skullerud and the land that originally belonged to the farm that has given name to the suburb. Another example is Bispevika. It's the bay east of the outlet of Akerselva. Nobody would consider the islands nor Gamlebyen as being part of Bispevika. The administrative 'bydeler' have already been mapped, eg. Bydel Sagene: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1279939#map=15/59.9343/10.7567
NKA (2020-11-13 20:01:24+00:00): I agree with Tractor. The current suburb names are at the same (and right) level. They have been carefully selected by the local community through many years of mapping. Deleting place nodes or moving them around without local knowledge is not very helpful. You are welcome to start a discussion at forum.openstreetmap.org of course.
kunyasobe (2020-11-13 20:06:31+00:00): Disappointing, but not a surprise to read your message. Although I wrote a conciliatory post in private to open for improvement and collaboration, you decided to ignore that and focus on a small detail stubbornly and authoritatively. But again, that is not a surprise considering the tone of your first message. 
I will put it simply for you, so you don't evade the real issue here, and you can answer straight forward: Do you think it looks correct that Majorstuen or Tøyen stay at the same level as Meyerløkka or Jordal?
The wiki definition is not set in stone, and most of these places were created before there was even a definition there. Apart from that, the wiki looks monopolized.
So it is open for modification and debate. 
The fact that you and NKA have worked on the map and are emotionally attached to its current status is not a valid argument but a fallacy. Nobody owns this content, it doesn't matter if 99% of the work is yours. This is a typical example of monopolization of wikis.
kunyasobe (2020-11-13 20:10:52+00:00): Thank you NKA. I will work with other mappers interested to push and carry out a significant modification of the places in Oslo since it is clearly left behind and lacks any reasonable organization. As I replied before to "Tractor" it is always sad when a wiki gets monopolized and let feelings interfere with improvements and good-intentioned colaboration.
kunyasobe (2020-11-13 20:16:33+00:00): Ps to NKA: Who decides and why do you think you know who has local knowledge and who doesn't? That is monopolization and claiming ownership over a wiki, which is not acceptable.
NKA (2020-11-13 20:29:40+00:00): Denne dialogen fører lite godt med seg. Jeg foreslår at du skriver et saklig innlegg på forumet dersom du har forslag til omfattende endringer i Oslo. Det er respektfullt overfor dem som har lagt ned arbeid her.
Tractor (2020-11-13 20:31:06+00:00): kunyasobe: The reason I replied here, and not to the private messages you sent me, is that I belive it is better to have an open and transparent discussion where everybody can participate. That's the opposite of trying to monopolize things.

You seem to ignore that OSM is not intended to be a copy of official maps.

And to answer the only question you seem to care about: I do agree that some places could be downgraded from place=suburb to place=quarter or place=neighbourhood. Meyerløkka would be a perfect candate.
Tractor (2020-11-13 20:32:05+00:00): ... candidate.
eserte (2021-10-09 18:10:51+00:00): Hallo, bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870949699#map=19/52.25166/13.92855&layers=N ist anscheinend ein Editierunfall passiert...
L___I (2021-10-20 22:43:49+00:00): Hallo eserte,

nein, da lief bei meinem Änderungssatz soweit alles gut, siehe graphische Darstellung:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94019560

Allerdings wurde ein Punkt (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8112964557) des von Dir erwähnten Weges in einem nachfolgenden Änderungssatz (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112202319) von Benutzer (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lucy%20L) verschoben.

Du bist wahrscheinlich versehentlich bei meinem Änderungssatz herausgekommen, da es das Wegstück betrifft, dieses bekommt aber keine neue Versionsnummer, wenn nur einer der Punkte verschoben wird.

Der "Editierunfall" von "Lucy L" wurde nun bereits behoben, siehe:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112558480
Schöne Grüsse
L___I
eserte (2021-10-21 15:15:04+00:00): Danke für die Klarstellung.
Frans S (2020-12-09 09:03:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
The assignment here is to map buildings. Not to map a block of buildings as a residential area.
Residential areas serve to cover an entire neighbourhood (named) a village or city.
Please map buildings and map them individually>
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2020-11-12 22:15:21+00:00): Top Edwin!
Je ziet de rendering komt weer tevoorschijn.
Nu staat het wel voor fietsen open.
bicycle=yes is namelijk default op highway=path en net als foot=yes.

We taggen het gewoon voor de duidelijkheid. 
Mag je niet fietsen dan vehicle=no toevoegen. 

Is het dus vrij wandelen en fietsen of is het alleen vrij wandelen  op wegen en paden. Er staat (of heeft gestaan)  vast wel zo'n bordje ergens. 

Gr eggie
Vinber (2020-11-14 12:09:52+00:00): hello, it's a huge changeset and "tyrosse insdustry" it's not clear for example for this change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807745242

it's to understand, it's a good thing to see you mapping :)
Dawid2849 (2020-11-12 22:01:04+00:00): *Świlcza, przepraszam za literówkę
literan (2020-11-13 21:21:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не надо применять тег crossing=marked. Он выдуман авторами редактора iD, не описан толком в вики и ничего не означает в России (в Британии, откуда авторы редактора родом, зебра рисуется только на нерегулируемых перекрестках, а у нас - на любых). Используйте crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals, как описано в вики. Тут это ттег удалю как неприменимый для РФ
ququruzka (2020-11-17 11:12:38+00:00): не пишіть назви вулиць ібудинків в імена контейнерів більше.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:49:31+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DSem (2021-01-11 12:31:08+00:00): Доброго дня,
Що відбувається з цим мостом?
Якщо він тимчасово закритий на ремонт, то більш доцільно буде не змінювати тип на "construction", а залишити highway=primary та використати "умовні обмеження" наприклад:
access:conditional=no @ (2020 Nov 13-2021 May 01)
та додати тег "note" з описом ситуації.
shargat (2021-01-11 14:54:28+00:00): Доброго дня, на момент внесення цієї правки міст був повністю розібраний, і на його місці будувалась нова споруда. Яка ситуація там наразі, я не детально моніторив, проте ніяких новин про введення його в експлуатацію я не бачив, як і точних термінів введення. Є новина про закриття мосту на проїзд https://komr.gov.ua/news/ruh-cherez-shlyahoprovid-po-vul-bilocerkivskiy-perekryto а також відео з місця будівництва, яке показує його стан https://youtu.be/4WW0W1NsnYU?t=1510 Тому вважаю доречним саме такий варіант правки
DSem (2021-01-12 07:22:56+00:00): Доброго дня,
Згоден, що можливо і так зробити.
Але тег "note" з описом ситуації, датою початку та ймовірним терміном закінчення робіт краще додати. Щоб іншим маперам було зрозуміло, що тут відбувається.
ququruzka (2020-11-17 11:12:13+00:00): не пишіть назви вулиць ібудинків в імена контейнерів більше.
mike140 (2021-04-13 12:07:08+00:00): Что ж такая кривая баскетбольная площадка? Для выравнивания прямоугольников используйте клавишу "Q"
Glassman (2020-11-12 23:47:52+00:00): I'm curious about your comment aligned stream to Lidar. Are you doing this in iD or how?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94022290
dieterdreist (2022-03-09 11:14:27+00:00): Hi, I have seen you changed the common tag office=it to the rarely used combination office=company and company=software_development
Can you explain your reasoning?
Cheers,
Martin
AlexOsmFr (2022-03-14 17:20:56+00:00): Hello,
I simply followed this wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany
Shouldn't I ?
Best regards,
Alex
dieterdreist (2022-03-14 23:22:57+00:00): I wouldn’t necessarily, it is a tag that is often used because it renders, but specifics are scarse, and many companies are tagged with a different scheme (office=* where * is different to “company”)
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values
Only 3000 company=* specific tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:company

Cheers
Martin
Supaplex (2020-11-13 05:17:01+00:00): 是這位人士回報的
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/765134
所以不知道是消失還是報錯位置
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94022932
catdreamer (2020-11-13 07:15:56+00:00): 來自魯地圖的勘誤回報，地點錯誤且正確位置已有標示。
Hervé TUC (2020-11-13 08:29:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous ajoutez beaucoup d'informations ces derniers temps, mais comme cela vous a déjà été demandé il faudrait que vous fournissiez plus d'informations.
Les sentiers que vous ajoutez semblent être de simple import gpx. Le problème est que pour être ajouté sur OSM ceux-ci doivent correspondre à de "vrais" sentiers (utilisé et utilisables par d'autres, si c'est simplement votre dernière promenade au milieu de la forêt cela n'intéresse personne).
Par ailleurs ils sont souvent mal taggués, en montagne il s'agit principalement de highway=path et non footway (qui correspond à de l'urbain ou tout du moins à un sentier aménagé).
Enfin quand vos chemins ajoutés ne sont connectés à aucun autre ils sont de fait inutilisable pour le calcul d'itinéraire, ce qui est bien dommage.
Merci de répondre à ce message afin de nous éclairer sur ce que vous faites et suivre nos conseils à l'avenir.
Cordialement
osmviborg (2020-11-23 07:52:23+00:00): Er det ikke først den 13. december?
mikkolukas (2020-11-23 08:44:19+00:00): Oh, dear. Jeg må være særligt i stykker i mit hoved for tiden.

Tak!
Rettet i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94623220

Så må jeg "åbne" den igen den 13. - en slags julekalender, om man vil ;)
user_5359 (2020-11-13 04:52:45+00:00): Hello! Please check https://www.osm.org/way/490035419: you add a wrong email address.
CjMalone (2020-12-08 14:59:33+00:00): I didn't add that email address, I was fixing data issues with the building. The invalid email was already present in OSM.
ovruni (2020-11-18 00:15:50+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en varias de sus conjuntos de cambios anteriores se agregaron diferentes vías con la etiqueta leisure=park [0], usadas en vías de tierras de cultivo, cementerios, estadios, etc, así como también en vías donde no se pueden visibilizar parques, de tal forma que no permiten cumplir con el criterio de verificabilidad. [1]

Por otra parte, en esta zona el Equipo Humanitario de OSM ha agregado edificaciones usando la imagen aérea de Maxar [2], la cual es la mas actualizada en la zona, considere esto antes de desplazar o eliminar vías de la zona basado en la imagen de Bing.

También en sus conjuntos de cambios ha ingresado textos que en algunos casos no se relacionan a lo realizado en cada conjunto de cambios como los relacionados a creación de ríos, por favor considere agregar un texto en su conjunto de cambios que permita al resto de la comunidad comprender lo que se ha querido modificar, para este propósito puede ver la sección sobre los buenos conjuntos de cambios[3].

Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe

Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxar
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
skquinn (2020-11-13 00:32:48+00:00): 2421848 and 2421851*
MikeN (2020-11-13 13:21:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  When improving the shape of things, it is best to adjust the outline rather than deleting and redrawing.   For example in this case the address was deleted along with the object history.   I restored the address.

 Also houses look much better with square corners. You can square them up by selecting and then pressing the Q key.
TheBestIdea (2020-11-13 21:04:25+00:00): Thanks for all the Randalls Island clean up! If motor vehicles are generally allowed on this way, it should be changed to 'highway=service' from 'highway=cycleway' (to match the other ways it's connected to where vehicles are allowed)
wrobelwroblasty (2020-11-13 04:05:21+00:00): Vandalizm
DP24PH (2020-11-14 16:53:44+00:00): Unfortunately, with the non-existent median in Bacoor City part of Bacoor-Dasmarinas National Road, Molino Road segment (from Dasmarinas City to Molino Overpass construction), conversion to dual carriageway is hereby unacceptable and may affect several route relations (including the current City Bus 29), especially if iD editor is used. Kindly avoid converting such carriageway specifications without the required verifications.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-13 11:54:33+00:00): Estimado. Está practicamente todo con conceptos equivocados y mal ejecutados. Por favor contactar a la comunidad.
smanidee (2020-11-13 01:48:25+00:00): Hi,
Please find the appropriate comment for the changeset:94025397, Added residential road and driveway.
Regards,
Smanidee
tastrax (2020-11-18 22:02:00+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mariotomo (2020-11-13 22:52:22+00:00): hola, gracias por actualizar lo que actualizaste.  para las próximas, podrías tener en cuenta las sugerencias en el wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mariotomo (2020-11-13 22:57:34+00:00): (muy buena contribución, acabo de revisarla, gracias. sólo no te dejes engañar por los techos de dos aguas.)
ElliottPlack (2020-11-13 04:14:19+00:00): Nice work!! I made a few tweaks to the tags and removed a double covered creek up north
Sparks (2020-11-13 04:27:31+00:00): Awesome.  I think it's going to be good to come back and look at everything again.  Many tributaries had already been "fixed" so I didn't even look at them.
Joseph E (2020-11-21 18:20:24+00:00): I disagree with mapping the entirety of Chesapeak Bay as natural=water. This bay is part of the marine environment. It is not a river or lake or even a coastal lagoon, but rather a shallow bay with an open connection to the high seas. Many of the channels along its edges are not true rivers, but rather tidal channels which are created and influenced by the bi-directional flow of water from the tides. The water is less salty than the open ocean, but that is also true of many marginal seas, including ones like Puget Sound, the Baltic Sea (which has quite low salinity) and Delaware Bay just northeast. 

It is possible to map the bay as a natural=bay relation instead. If the local community really wants to map this as natural=water instead ofa. natural=bay, I suppose that’s not too harmful, as long as the ways at the edges are returned to tagged with natural=coastline like before.

Also see the discussion about this issue on the Tagging list, where there is clear support for mapping bays with natural=coastline.
tux67 (2020-11-13 08:41:37+00:00): Hi - was ist denn hier die Quelle der Daten. Wäre - wie immer - wünschenswert, wenn die beim Upload mit angegeben wird. Auf den aktuellen NRW Orthos stehen die Turbinen noch bzw. noch nicht. Desweiteren macht es Sinn für die abgebauten Lifecycle präfixe zu verwenden und ein check date einzutragen, um zu vermeiden daß der nächste nach Luftbild ggf. veraltete Infos wieder einträgt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94027670
skquinn (2020-11-13 06:06:36+00:00): Please save before editing in a different country. This bounding box stretches across half the planet.
user_5359 (2020-12-22 06:28:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/871028290: Is the admin_level value correct?
mueschel (2020-11-15 10:01:08+00:00): Hi,
please explain what the tag means: 
staticBikeParkAndRide=yes

This is not used in any other place.
JayTurnr (2021-01-03 10:14:38+00:00): In this edit, you removed valid data from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171620362 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171620363 

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Descape