piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
threeof4 (2021-09-22 05:47:47+00:00): Dank Jeroen, ik was al eens op JOSM gewezen door eggie. Daar moet ik op win10 nog mee bezig maar op m'n macbook draaide die niet. Maar denk niet dat ik het erg vind om het in een browser te doen hoor. Ben lekker bezig om het beter te maken, super leuk. 
Grt 3of4
Herman Lee (2021-09-22 06:59:23+00:00): 创新谷街道 is not apply for admin_level=9
Herman Lee (2021-09-22 07:01:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6136747214这个应该是使用9级而不是8
EnumMapper (2021-09-22 08:05:56+00:00): 您好，此修改集批量修改china_class=jiedao。街道是8， 根据 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
Herman Lee (2021-09-22 08:07:24+00:00): 但是最好不要这样，有些具体的细节要具体分析，比如黑区
Herman Lee (2021-09-22 08:16:48+00:00): 我会给这个页面添加一点细节
EnumMapper (2021-09-22 09:56:41+00:00): 我筛选的的规则是  node["china_class"="jiedao"][!capital];
不会修改有capital的街道。如果有少量误改，请手动修改
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-23 15:26:48+00:00): 中国的街道等级和各种新区之类的等级都是变动非常快的，这种编辑可能会误导后续的没有经验的编辑者，而不一定能及时做出修改
不建议在这种小等级上搞自动编辑
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-23 15:27:25+00:00): 另外，china_class快被替了，您可以考虑参与place:CN的投票，期待您的意见
Leo Slager (2021-09-22 15:23:29+00:00): Dag rivw,
Met deze changeset heb je de hele Zaan laten "leeglopen". Op de kaart is het nu een groot wit vlak ipv blauw.
Waarschijnlijk heb je niet eens in de gaten gehad dat je een multipolygoon aan het vernielen was.
Die multipolygoon heb ik weer gerepareerd.
Wellicht is het aan te raden om de theorie van de multipolygonen nog eens te bestuderen.
Leo Slager (2021-09-22 15:25:46+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.78580&lat=52.51041&zoom=16&opacity=0.77
Carto'Cité (2022-02-17 15:10:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour l'amélioration de la piste. Effectivement on ne trouve pas beaucoup de données pour savoir ce quoi il s'agit : https://actu.fr/normandie/cairon_14123/la-nouvelle-piste-cyclable-entre-cairon-et-saint-contest-est-accessible_43776053.html
Je me permet quelques modifications et n'hésite pas à commenter en retour :)
J'ai regardé différents articles :
- https://actu.fr/normandie/cairon_14123/la-nouvelle-piste-cyclable-entre-cairon-et-saint-contest-est-accessible_43776053.html
- https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/cairon-14610/cairon-la-piste-cyclable-cairon-buron-est-tres-attendue-7190768
- https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/cairon-14610/la-voie-cyclable-entre-cairon-et-buron-inauguree-539047da-ed60-11eb-82bb-b85d20a4a8e7
et je ne vois qui permette de dire foot=designated au contraire le panneau C113 semble plutôt indiqué que la piste est interdite aux piétons (https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000039277970/ ; bon je ne suis pas pour l'approche réglementaire bête et méchante rassure-toi). Je retire le foot=designated mais n'hésite psa à me dire si je me trompe et pourquoi. Il manque aussi le sens unique cyclable ; j'ajoute donc oneway=yes et oneway:bicycle=yes pour rendre plus robuste à des évolutions de tag (passage en path, etc.).
À ta disposition pour en discuter :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
divaddivag (2022-02-17 20:31:42+00:00): Salut Charles, pas de soucis tu sembles mieux connaitre que moi la meilleure façon de typer les pistes cyclable! Historiquement il y a avait un sentier caillouteux sur un coté de la berne et ils ont simplement mis 2 bandes de goudron de chaque coté.  Je pense que le caractère multi-usagers demeure. Je n'habite pas très loin donc j'irais vérifier la signalétique un de ces jours! Bien à toi D
Carto'Cité (2022-02-22 11:51:25+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. Je pense que tu as raison sur le fait que ce sera utilisé par les piétons et ils auront bien raison. Je ne mets pas le foot=yes qui serait faux dans la même mesure que je ne mets pas des bicycles=yes quand c'est faux (j'ai encore un récent échanges avec des contributeurs et le consensus va vers cette pratique même si c'est à évaluer au cas par cas).
Charles.
MoiraPrime (2021-09-25 22:32:12+00:00): You randomly removed the service road that leads to the Emergency Room of a hospital. Why?
Geogast (2021-09-21 20:35:28+00:00): source=Bing (mit offset)
maraf24 (2021-09-28 09:24:47+00:00): Galeria już była.
Proszę nie tworzyć duplikatów.
user_13480796 (2021-09-22 03:36:35+00:00): Hinweis zu diesem Changeset:
Ich arbeite hier mit ganz traditionellen Mitteln, Block und Bleistift. Aufgrund von mehrfach in OSM vorgefundenen Mausefallen (trap) ist noch eine Nachbegehung von meiner Seite erforderlich. Ich werde diese Arbeiten dort bis Oktober 2021 erledigt haben. 
Leider muss ich hier aber auch die Reputation eines regionalen OpenStreetMap Mitwirkenden der bis 2013 in dieser Region aktiv war ernsthaft Infrage stellen.
DaveF (2021-10-20 11:46:06+00:00): Hi
What are these?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985630760
Mordechai23 (2021-10-12 16:28:42+00:00): Czemu primary? Patrząc na sieć dróg w okolicy, ta ma co najwyżej znaczenie dla osiedla domków jednorodzinnych i trasy autobusu miejskiego, więc powinna być co najwyżej tertiary. Ruch międzymiastowy z DK91 do Alei JP2 prowadzony jest Aleją WP, więc nie widzę sensu twojej zmiany
Radoslao (2021-10-12 16:47:20+00:00): Zmieniłem kategorię ulicy Warszawskiej na primary, ponieważ ma status drogi krajowej (DK91). Odcinek Alei Wojska Polskiego od Alei Jana Pawła II do Austostrady A1 stracił status drogi krajowej po otwarciu autostradowej obwodnicy Częstochowy, a DK91 biegnie przez Warszawską. Moja zmiana ma jak najbardziej sens. Tym bardziej, że Warszawska ma kategorię primary również m.in. w Google Maps, Geoportalu Krajowym i częstochowskim geoportalu mieszkańców.
Mordechai23 (2021-10-12 17:02:06+00:00): 1. "ponieważ ma status drogi krajowej (DK91)" W OSM bardzo ważne jest byśmy nie podążali ślepo po klasyfikacji urzędniczej. W tym przypadku niekoniecznie primary=/=droga krajowa. Wiele dróg krajowych w Polsce nie spełnia wcale opisów =primary (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dprimary) czyli drogi łączącej duże miasta oraz ich obwodnice - z powodów które opisałem w poprzednim komentarzu.

2. "DK91 biegnie przez Warszawską." to samo co wyżej

3. "Tym bardziej, że Warszawska ma kategorię primary również m.in. w Google Maps" Z tym trzeba bardzo uważać, kopiowanie danych i rozwiązań z konkurencyjnych map to stąpanie po cieńkiej linii zasad praw autorskich
VA00 (2022-03-10 07:19:08+00:00): Te króciutkie uliczki w bok to raczej jako podjazd (na końcu jest brama?), i to z dostępem prywatnym się kwalifikuje.  Podjazdy nie dziedziczą też nazwy po drodze od której odchodzą.
fabiotofy (2021-10-02 22:03:41+00:00): Ciao, io eviterei di mettere nel tag name delle aree pedonali i nomi di tutte le vie a cui questi si riferiscono. Il risultato grafico finale è terribile, nella mappa vengono ripetuti in maniera sovrapposta i medesimi elementi di toponomastica più volte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111515241
SekeRob (2021-09-22 05:41:48+00:00): Hi

Your Slovak railway edits seem to have reached more than just Slovakia as the edit box box extends to Bretagne and Madrid, to include 31 warnings as shown above that are begging to be fixed.

Just so you're aware there's problems with what you did and 'touched'.

cheers
Tomas_J (2021-09-22 06:44:56+00:00): Hallo. I mistakenly edited the Sol subway station  (5301853067, v7). I am terribly sorry for this.   I intended to change the railway station  of the same name in Slovakia instead. By the changeset  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111525239 I returned everything back as was before my edit (version 6). As for the other warnings - they have been there before my edit and they are unfortunately out of scope fore right now. I am once again sorry for my edit of the Spainnish Sol subway station, I will be more careful in the future and I will also check my other changesets.  Let my know if anything else is needed.
treestryder (2021-09-21 22:42:26+00:00): Most of those houses are better classified as building=detached .

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Places
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111515558
tuttiton (2021-09-22 11:11:36+00:00): Thanks, updated these and some I added before. Will update others in time. found some houses i missed while doing that!
5m4u9 (2021-09-22 06:04:34+00:00): hola, las paradas finales de las líneas son también paradas donde dejan y recogen pasajeros por ello deben ser "highway=bus_stop + public_transport=platform + bus=yes". 

Por otro lado, para constatar que la parada está en un lugar estaba utilizando la imagen satelital "MAXAR"
mueschel (2021-10-02 08:19:06+00:00): Hi,
is "date:end_NG" the date the railway ended to be narrow gauge? Neither "date:end" nor suffizes like "_NG" are common.
Following common tagging schemes, the most reasonable tag would be 
"narrow_gauge:end_date". Would you mind changing that?
sfrank (2021-10-02 08:52:03+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your comment. I uploaded the change right now. Sometimes it is not easy to find a good tag name.
geetings from germany
eggie (2021-09-22 09:19:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..

healthcare op zich rendert niet de naam. Wanneer je office=therapist toe zou voegen heeft het wel effect..mits natuurlijk de vlag de lading dekt.  

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-22 09:21:36+00:00): Bovenstaand toegevoegd.. Rendering duurt even. 
MVG
eggie
aweech (2021-09-21 22:21:45+00:00): Hi,
The southern border of Weber County runs in the middle of the channel of the Weber River. Can you please put it back?
KKS (2024-03-29 19:25:03+00:00): https://museum.kpi.ua/map/?d=kyiv&l1=1918-03.UA.TOPO&l2=&z=15&lon=30.446033&lat=50.532157
martinst (2021-09-24 21:51:39+00:00): Hallo Norbert,
bitte bei name= keine Phantasienamen eintragen sondern nur Eigennamen.
Hinweise können z.B. mit description= hinzugefügt werden.
Gruß Martin
5m4u9 (2021-09-22 06:15:36+00:00): Hi, you changed boundaries of national parks/protected_areas to aboriginal_lands. Both natural parks/protected areas and aboriginal_lands are important, you should be create new relation of boundaries with the external ways.
NFZANMNIM (2021-09-22 07:16:31+00:00): Hi, for case of Pilon Lajas, it's not two identical areas. It's 1 area that became national reserve in 1977, and the ownership of the reserve was then in 1992 given to Indigenous peoples. So I don't think showing two relationships, one "Reserva de la Biósfera Pilón Lajas" and another "Tierra Comunitaria de Origen Pilón Lajas" is a good idea, as they've never (since 1992) been separate things.
5m4u9 (2021-09-22 23:20:18+00:00): create a new relation reusing the same area is a partial solution without affecting the national protected areas.

I think replace the national protected areas to aboriginal lands is a mistake because they are 2 different areas.
5m4u9 (2021-09-22 23:28:49+00:00): Oh nooo, you deleted official boundary of national protected areas... I will restore
Carnildo (2021-09-21 22:08:14+00:00): Please don't.  We're supposed to be getting a much better set of building outlines to import from in the near future.
jcr83 (2022-09-03 20:09:19+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu as ajouté un passage à gué sur cette route :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9112067531, alors qu'il y a un tunnel.
Renard Empiriste (2022-09-03 20:50:38+00:00): oh pardon!  Merci pour ton coup d’œil, je corrige ça.
Renard Empiriste (2022-09-03 20:57:35+00:00): je suis aller vérifier par d'autre source si la route passe par dessus le ruisseau par un pont et que le tunnel serait une erreur mais apparemment non.   Donc le ruisseau passe par dessus le tunnel qui passe par dessus la route? Ça me semble étrange. 
Je vais voir avec les cartes d'hydrographie si ce ruisseau a bien été placé.
Renard Empiriste (2022-09-03 20:59:52+00:00): je ne vois pas le ruisseau sur la DB Carthage (hydrographie a travers l'interface ID)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 07:19:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=upv
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940477267/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=up
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
leni8ec (2024-03-10 02:16:15+00:00): Yes, there should be "up".

Thanks.
ovruni (2021-09-21 23:12:07+00:00): Hola, he modificado algunas vías que tenían la etiqueta de edificios, pero que parecen contener zonas que no son edificios según la imagen de Esri aclarada, algunas las he ajustado y otras las he cambiado como muros. También he separado las vías de edificios para que no compartan nodos con las veredas.
Saludos
Carnildo (2021-09-21 23:01:01+00:00): Please stop adding low-quality scribbles to the map.
NieWnen (2021-09-21 23:10:06+00:00): Zdjęcie zakazu ruchu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111517252
woodpeck (2021-10-09 11:17:39+00:00): The bus route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12848426 you have edited in this changeset makes a huge detour to Centro Medico Mae Lewis without having any stops there. Is that really correct? The "reverse" direction looks very different. Please, editing bus routes is a difficult task - let other community members help you learn a couple of quality control tools so that you don't break them!
mariotomo (2021-10-18 14:10:55+00:00): Alvarado2510, te traduzco el jugo del mensaje? "editar rutas de buses es complicado", y "acepta la ayuda que se te ofrece".
mariotomo (2021-11-12 23:06:37+00:00): @woodpeck, do you think you manage to reach this mapper?  I don't know how.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113500783
mariotomo (2021-11-14 13:32:48+00:00): about the detour, that's what Rick Morales observed and recorded when he visited David (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rick%20Morales/traces/3818747): both northbound and southbound routes take that loop, both clockwise.  we do not have bus stop positions.
mariotomo (2022-06-29 14:30:27+00:00): still waiting for this guy to engage in communication.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123003847
mariotomo (2022-09-11 23:17:28+00:00): apparently, they have been helping each other in the "other Panama group", now again accessible to non members. https://t.me/OpenstreetmapPanama/786
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 03:16:31+00:00): Saludos Mariotomo, que bueno que me todas el tema de la ruta a Loma Colorada, creo que los nombre estan mal entre las dos relaciones, la que dice que su destino es David Este, esta al reves, por favor si me permites hacer la corrección, te lo agradezco, pero actualmente esta mal, la descripción de ambas relaciones.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 13:13:06+00:00): sugiero que al hacer la corrección, la bases en una grabación con GPS del recorrido del bus, de terminal a terminal, algún día que tengas la oportunidad. como estamos hablando de una edición de más de hace un año, no creo que haya prisa ahora.
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 22:49:17+00:00): saludos mariotomo, yo no estoy haciendo enfacis a recorrido del gps, mi corrección es entre las dos relaciónes, por ejemplo la ruta que va de X a Y, hace el recorrido al reves, la otra relación tiene el mismo error.
Quiero decir que ambas relaciones tiene cruzadas su origen y destino, es lo que quize corregír y revertiste, te sugiero estudies donde queda la loma colorada y el sentido de calles one way, en el mapa para que descubras el error en las relaciones.
mariotomo (2021-10-18 16:06:37+00:00): hola, entiendo que vives ahí, pero estás muy cierto de eso? Rick siguió el bus en su ruta y observó que el terminal está en uso.
mariotomo (2021-10-02 14:38:38+00:00): a parte que le quitaste la sección hacia la terminal de transporte, documentada por Rick Morales, y que la sección que cambiaste no corresponde con lo grabado por GPS, también introduciste un par de errores lógicos:

error_unordered_gap: 	T
no_stops_pltf_at_begin: 	T
stoppltf_after_route: 	T

no vuelvo a mejorarlo pues ya sé que volverás a editarlo a tu manera.  estoy buscando cómo entendernos.
mariotomo (2021-10-15 15:25:18+00:00): le pedí apoyo al grupo de integridad de datos (DWG) para evitar una guerra de ediciones, pero no me contestan, así que qué le vamos a hacer, será que es necesario entendernos siguiendo deshaciendo el trabajo del otro?
mariotomo (2021-10-15 15:27:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112547744
felipeeugenio (2021-09-22 14:21:16+00:00): Hola Ivan
ojo con la eliminación de las direcciones. Si bien ya no hay un Chileexpress ahí, sigue siendo Americo Vespucio 1501. Y borraste todo. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111517768
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-11-03 02:56:17+00:00): voce transformou a via em um área de lazer, inutilizando a mesma totalmente, reverti isso.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 00:29:49+00:00): You're clearly not spending enough, if any, time reviewing things.  One of the "buildings" in this changeset is a travel trailer, and another only vaguely resembles the actual structure on the ground.

Please stop.
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 00:35:45+00:00): As a fellow contributor you're welcome to make any changes you feel are necessary. Thanks!
Carnildo (2021-09-22 00:46:06+00:00): The change I feel necessary is to revert everything you've done since changeset #111471825 as an undiscussed import.  Do you agree?
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 00:48:50+00:00): Unfortunately to OSM standards that would be considered vandalism since you're removing sourced information and aren't replacing it. Probably not the best idea.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 00:58:11+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and the rest of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Import_Policy -- the standard for imports is "guilty until proven innocent".

I'd prefer not to revert it myself -- the Data Working Group has better tools and more experience than I do.
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 01:10:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RapiD
Considering that RapiD appears to be a formally accepted import tool by the OSM community it would appear that it falls under these guidelines. The main ask of this tool is to review the information being added, which I believe I do. But such as any editing situation, there can be human error as well as satellite variation where certain areas may be more difficult to map that others. So if you happen to find an error that someone (or I) have missed, you’re welcome to help contribute a fix to that.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 01:26:29+00:00): When used carefully, inspecting each candidate building against appropriate imagery to ensure that it (1) exists and (2) is traced properly, RapID is an accepted tool.

When using it as you are, importing buildings at rates in excess of one per second, it falls solidly under the import guidelines.

And shifting the burden of error checking onto me is unacceptable.  It takes about five minutes to inspect each changeset, or longer if I need to fix anything.  The 600 or so changesets you've made in the past day will take me about a month to review if everything is perfect; given the number of errors I've found so far, three to four months is a more reasonable estimate.
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 01:33:46+00:00): Unfortunately that would be a matter of opinion then. When using the tool, I can see if the building outline looks correct and then add it accordingly, which doesn't take months to figure out in my opinion. If a building isn't outlined properly I either attempt to realign it myself or don't add it altogether. Once again however, with satellite variation, blockages (trees etc), there may not be a perfect solution to a building's outline. A general outline or an outline that appears close enough to the real building is generally accepted versus missing information.
literan (2021-11-23 13:38:26+00:00): а почему maxspeed=RU:living_street?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633198539/history

Разве там жилая зона/дворовая территория? По снимку непохоже, да и замаплена как промзона
d1sr4n (2021-11-24 00:20:53+00:00): Приает.

Там территории заправки, автосалонов и прочего такого бизнеса окраин. По проездам ходят люди, явный приоритет пешехода.

Мне не принципиально, можешь снести если тебе мешает.
literan (2021-11-24 07:32:44+00:00): по ПДД приоритет у пешеходов в жилых зонах, обозначенных соответствующим знаком, а также в приравниваемых к ним дворовых территориях. Если здесь нет ни того ни другого, то преимущества у пешеходов нет (как нет его у торговых центров, на территории промпредприятий и тп). 

Мне пофиг, регион не мой и я править там не собираюсь, просто обратил твое внимание на неверное, скорее всего, тегирование.
d1sr4n (2021-11-24 14:26:03+00:00): Ну пофиг так к чему это все тогда
A Hall (2022-03-11 15:38:23+00:00): Looks like there are now two NH 63 Relations. The other one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7422823. 

In addition, the one you added includes the NH in the route number. On the relation, there shouldn't be anything but the route number. This is causing strange behavior on the shield rendering on americana.
aweech (2022-03-11 22:36:38+00:00): Ugh, I had been checking for fragments before creating new relations, but I missed that one. Also, it's the old one that has NH in the ref, not the one I made. I'll go ahead and delete the incomplete and mistagged one tonight.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 00:34:35+00:00): Is there a reason why you think that Maplewood Gardens, The Academy, Altura, and The Highline shouldn't be apartment buildings, or is it just that RapID is allergic to classifying building types?
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 00:38:13+00:00): For whatever reason any buildings classified as "Apartment Building" don't appear in renders that use OSM. Replacing them with a point or an area zone to retain the information of the building would be preferred.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 00:44:48+00:00): Which renderer are you using that is so incredibly broken that it ignores some building types?

The correct thing to do is to fix the renderer, not break the map.
snarkyclarky (2021-09-22 00:52:00+00:00): Render users like Snapchat, Pokemon Go, and travel apps show missing information for that label. Must be something on Mapbox's end that needs to be fixed.
armitageone (2022-08-04 10:00:42+00:00): Здесь не может быть охотничьей вышки
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-30 04:05:29+00:00): Hi, this change broke a boundary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/125662#map=14/42.3449/-87.9509

Are you able to fix it?
prudhraj (2021-09-27 10:03:04+00:00): Hi PaulWebbtheTechExpert, please help us understand the reason behind deleting this road segment (Motor way link - 19590162). Here the road is paved and is not under construction as per latest imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/36.46845/-86.67964 . Please correct me if I'm wrong here. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111518726
Carnildo (2021-09-22 01:51:29+00:00): Three errors:

1) A building missing a quarter of its outline.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) Three buildings mapped as one.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 01:47:08+00:00): Two errors:

1) A building missing a corner
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
Carnildo (2021-09-22 01:56:21+00:00): Three errors:

1) Removal of "building=apartments" tags from two buildings.
2) Mapping four buildings as one.
3) A building outline is about 25% larger than the building.
ElliottPlack (2021-09-22 01:58:35+00:00): Forgot to add MNCPPC as a source
Frans S (2021-09-22 10:44:41+00:00): Hello.
I reviewed your work. This is better.
I just adjusted a few mappings.
see
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111536741
Best regards
wireguy (2021-09-22 11:36:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM Cass0902!  You added some great information about the house, but the outline should be sized to be the exact base of the building.   I changed it and one other as an example.  Can you change the others?   Keep mapping!