piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:39:24+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
VladaC (2022-02-19 23:51:42+00:00): Correct description of this changeset would be: "Information boards and maps in Horní Počernice/Chvaly". (Description of the previous changeset was repeated by mistake.)
Yury Yatsynovich (2023-11-13 14:11:54+00:00): It looks like the addresses in this changeset needed some edits: e.g., the street name "No Bear Hill Road" is actually "North Bear Hill Road"
jnighan (2023-11-16 00:34:54+00:00): Thanks. I think I fixed all the issues.
Owen Vespa (2022-02-21 04:32:18+00:00): Added a business information
Rainero (2022-02-21 21:12:41+00:00): Hallo d-boehmer,

das Eintragen einer neuen Adresse am bestehenden Laden (Ovis Products) führt nicht dazu, daß das Objekt in OSM an die neue Adresse wandert. Ich spile mal das Heinzelmännchen und verschiebe den Punkt in die Schiebestraße.  
Mit dem iD-Editor im Browser geht das über größere Strecken auch nicht vernünftig. Wenn in den Laden was neues eingezogen ist, ist es günstiger, den neuen Laden am bestehenden Punkt einzutragen und für den umgezogenen am neuen Ort einen neuen Punkt anzulegen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
d-boehmer (2022-02-21 22:11:54+00:00): wow, vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung! Ich wusste nicht, wie ich das im Browser Editor bewerkstelligen sollte. Danke für deine Nacharbeit!
lalolan (2022-02-21 12:53:22+00:00): Olá,
reparei que a tag admin_level=2 foi removida. Adicionei-a porque é o recomendado em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=government#Useful_combinations para informar que é um "office" a nível nacional e não local como uma Câmara Municipal ou Junta de Freguesia. Essa etiqueta não se aplica apenas a fronteiras. Há alguma razão para não usar essa tag neste caso?
AntMadeira (2022-02-21 13:36:08+00:00): Olá, lalolan.
Efetivamente, desconhecia que a essa etiqueta fosse usada para edifícios governamentais. Como estava a fazer uma varredura por "órfãos" da última revisão dos limites administrativos do país, julguei que fosse algum erro.
Assim sendo, peço que voltes a adicionar essas etiquetas, por favor.
Contudo, seria importante definir o significado de cada nível.
Se o 2 não deixa dúvidas que corresponde ao nível nacional, seria interessante atribuir os restantes valores em linha com o que está definido para os limites administrativos, ou seja, 4 para regiões autónomas, 7 para municípios e 8 para freguesias.

Cumprimentos,
António.
clay_c (2022-07-07 23:48:48+00:00): Hi meisoof,

In this changeset, you actually changed a busway to a service road. This busway was not tagged as an abandoned highway. I've reverted this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123338895

Let me know if you have any questions.

-Clay
Falsernet (2022-02-20 00:33:51+00:00): + minor road alignment, added some missing traffic calming, crossing way, shuffled some Lilford Avenue addresses across
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:38:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Anil Basnet (2022-04-03 04:33:19+00:00): Duplicated place.. please delete this node.
ivanbranco (2022-02-20 17:54:09+00:00): Hi nishboow,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/257252793/history

why did you change the place value from "square" to a more generic "yes"?
nishboow (2022-02-20 21:57:02+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,

It was a mistake on my part. I forgot to edit the tag correctly, it is now corrected. It's just an intersection, certainly not a square as the definitions mean.

Thank you,

nishboow
wireguy (2022-02-20 12:18:13+00:00): JriSv, you broke all the relations.  can you come back and correct them?
JriSv250 (2022-02-20 13:53:53+00:00): Which ones?
wireguy (2022-02-20 15:30:47+00:00):  you should be running validation in josm to check.   I saw
beach, relation 12022410
plum island relation 11965558
watch hill point relation 11832704

and also
new shoreham relation 7683596
block island relation 12022463
town of southold relation 12591562
JriSv250 (2022-02-20 23:12:40+00:00): I fixed them
wireguy (2022-02-20 23:28:04+00:00): thank you for taking the time to make the corrections.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 21:10:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033380701/history has shop = jajee that was added in this edit
shop=jajee ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
user_5359 (2022-02-22 09:01:54+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982369307/history. What is the meaning of the key namexb? Did you mean not:name?
felipeeugenio (2022-02-20 14:16:10+00:00): Hola Alonso. No todas las veredas deben ser dibujadas como footways.

1) Solo se dibujan así cuando van separadas de la calle, y cuando haces eso debes agregar a la calle sidewalk=separate (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:sidewalk)
2) cuando las dibujas separadas por favor terminarlas en la calle. Si las dejas "colgando" unidas a nada entonces no se puede rutear por ahí
3) en caso de que estén unidas por favor usar sidewalk=right/left/both

Veo en San Carlos que hay varias que están bien hechas, pero desconozco la realidad en terreno. Hasta están con los cruces.
Leer el link para mas detalles
saludos
2) para cuando van juntas
felipeeugenio (2022-02-20 14:17:12+00:00): adicionalmente; una posta no es un hospital, es amenity=doctors
felipeeugenio (2022-02-20 14:17:58+00:00): y por ultimo, por favor no realinear todo el pueblo cada vez que se cambia una foto. el pueblo ya está lo bastante bien cuadrado. es un trabajo que no vas a terminar nunca, porque la alineación de las fotos va cambiando.
saludos
sara qasem (2022-02-21 13:57:52+00:00): مرحبا لمياء,
ارجو ان تقومى بمراجعه قواعد الرسم والاضافه الخاصه ب خريطه الشارع المفتوح , حتى تستطيعى اضافه المعلومات بشكل صحيح 
على سبيل المثال اضافه هذا الطريق بدون تاج الهاى واى 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033384147#map=19/30.08789/31.32937&layers=G
وهو خاطئ بالاضافه ان هنا لا يوجد نفق العروبه
الرجاء اعلامى اذا كنتى تحتاجين للمساعده فى ذلك ومراجعه ما قمت به على الموقع

ساره
Kovoschiz (2022-02-20 08:39:37+00:00): `=cave_entrance` should only be used for caves, not tunnels. Please don't Tag For Renderer.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-20 10:22:29+00:00): 2. Don't remove the `direction=` either.
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:49:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318915046#map=17/51.02071/16.70655

tu jest trawnik, a na nim scrub?
vng_me (2022-02-20 08:03:43+00:00): Hello! Please, use JOSM editor if you edit shoreline objects. Use JOSM validator to check natural=coastline consistency after your edits.
Monumental610 (2022-02-23 19:11:50+00:00): please use the natural=woods OR natural=scrub tag in the future
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
user_5359 (2022-02-22 07:56:31+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9520966346. What is the meaning of the tag C No. : = 159?
VIPINDAS K (2022-02-22 12:45:22+00:00): This Number provided by Government (LSGD- Panchayat). 
It is Unique Number(Only inside the lsgd Boundary)
VIPINDAS K (2022-02-22 13:09:39+00:00): Corrected
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 12:05:15+00:00): Hello,
I'm not sure what happened here, but a weather buoy off the Atlantic coast of Aftrica https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history was deleted in this changeset.  I have restored it.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 12:05:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas ce qui s'est passé ici, mais une bouée météorologique au large de la côte atlantique de l'Afrique https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history a été supprimée dans cet ensemble de modifications. Je l'ai restauré.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
VNT974 (2022-02-20 12:10:16+00:00): Hello. All my apologies I have no clue what happened, 

Best regards and thanks for the revert. Sorry.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 118969120, 118970065, 118963778, 118967205, 118957711, 118968507, 118962450, 118966786, 118949130, 118953788, 118960745, 118964768, 118965662, 118966340, 118967991, 118955919, 118959262, 118967552 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
Emilius123 (2022-04-07 22:49:02+00:00): Hi,

Surely not intentional, but you messed stuff up a little at Rue Saint-Thomas Becket (way/997767689).

Please watch out more, doing mechanical edits like these.
warwick (2022-03-10 18:44:30+00:00): Hallo gerosm,
ich hab gesehen du hast die Relation 1402597 (Verbindungsweg Warmensteinach-Neuenmarkt) gelöscht.
War das Absicht? Hast du die Strecke komplett überprüft?

Soweit ich weiß, müssten die Abschnitte
- Marktschorgast-Lützenreuth-Metzlersreuth-Schweinsbach
sowie
- Bischofsgrün(Glasermühle)-Warmensteinach
noch existieren, sie werden vom Fichtelgebirgsverein markiert.

Viele Grüße,
warwick
gerosm (2022-03-11 05:40:11+00:00): Hallo warwick,
Danke für den Hinweis, da war ich wohl zu voreilig. Ich habe die Relation  wieder hergestellt.
Viele Grüße 
Gerhard
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:39:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033407565

landuse=orchard na środku pola??? nie dość że dublujesz obszary, to jeszcze na orto widać, że to zwyczajny las...
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:55:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2302887089/history

dodałeś grassland na węźle...
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-02-20 11:40:52+00:00): Would you mibd adding some more details? Or did something go wrong here?
Koen_VdE (2022-03-01 16:50:15+00:00): Nothing went wrong. I added the room when I was on site to get the correct location. I visited the website on pc to fill out the information.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-03-01 16:58:16+00:00): Ok, no problem!

I was afraid that MapComplete dropped some of your answers.
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-02-20 18:44:46+00:00): >5 к.4 стр.1

Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание на правильное написание адресов (сокращения стандартизированы, точек не надо): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2
Rizky IRM-ED (2023-03-21 03:39:50+00:00): Hi Angys A lot of mapping done, great work
I found an issue about relation building in (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3630597970) my question is it one building? If so, If so, the description of the multipolygon is inaccurate because it generates the error "multipogon outer way share segment with other rings", because the outer can't overlap each other
Is it possible to delete the multipolygon relation or not? Referring to here, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part maybe the type relation can be changed to type=building https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
Or any other suggestions?
Thanks in advance, cheers!!
Rizky IRM-ED (2023-03-21 03:43:21+00:00): link for relation building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13828713)
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 20:56:27+00:00): Duggleby not Drax
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oyl
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:37:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538803321

tu też rysujesz przecinające się poligony... 
JOSM zwraca komunikat o takim błędzie, ale postanowiłeś go zignorowac, nie wiem czemu
snoozingnewt (2022-02-21 02:51:29+00:00): Nice to meet you! Saw your work in Centralia - three questions.

1. Why are you making the trees overlap the buildings? OSM is a map of what's on the ground, not what you can see from satellite imagery. I doubt the building suddenly disappears under the cover of a tree.

2. Why are individual trees mapped as areas? They should be mapped as nodes. natural=wood is used for entire forests.

3. Specifically for the washington lawn cemetery, what's up with that? Does the cemetery not exist when there's tree cover? That does not look like the on-the-ground shape.

Thanks,
snoozingnewt
CarniLvr79 (2022-02-21 07:02:31+00:00): I am making the trees overlap buildings because it does not matter if they do or do not. It is preference. Consider GPS. It does not matter. You get to point A to point B. The shape of the building does not matter. Again, it is personal preference and there is no way to 100% confirm what the trees are covering up. Is it absolutely necessary that you get the outline of the building perfectly? Or is that YOUR personal preference? 

2. I have mapped individual trees with natural = wood because for a forest, you use forest. Wood is for whatever. As for nodes, for individual trees? Again, personal preference. Is there a specific size of a wooded area that qualifies to use wood versus forest? No. I do not think so, so it does not matter. I have seen some businesses who've used the map in the manner I have edited it in, and it is superior to what you are suggesting.

As for the cemetary. Again, take into consideration what you are asking, and desiring. It literally does not matter. One way or the other. I have highlighted trees. And there is nothing wrong choosing to do that.
ezekielf (2022-02-21 18:04:55+00:00): Although the exact line where forest/woods begins is certainly somewhat subjective, every single a square foot of land covered by tree canopy is not forest/woods.  Three trees in a park is not a forest.  This would be  more accurately mapped as thee individual tree nodes than as a tiny forest/woods area shaped exactly like the tree crowns.

Listening to feedback from other mappers is important in this collaborative project.  Dismissing it and saying that it doesn't matter is not really acceptable.

Please consider joining the wider US mapping community on Slack and the #local-washington-state channel there.
https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-21 18:44:07+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117695663
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117628622
ZeLonewolf (2022-02-21 18:48:02+00:00): Thanks @Spaghetti Monster for reverting this change.  I agree that given the quality issues that a rollback was necessary.

@CarniLvr79, openstreetmap is a community project, and it's important for you to listen to the concerns of other mappers and not dismiss them.

Specifically, polygons are are allowed to overlap when features overlap.  If a feature is on top of another feature, then those polygons representing them should overlap as well, with the layer=* tag used to indicate which ones are on top.

For buildings, the convention is to map the actual footprint of the building, not just the bits you're able to see during summer imagery when leaves are on the trees.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-21 18:53:52+00:00): Reverted for refusal to follow established norms.
Lee Carré (2022-02-22 22:59:47+00:00): Don't forget the barrier: http://www.osm.org/node/1880734960
Ger20 (2022-02-23 08:22:39+00:00): I did not change the barrier and the street after that. I did not have the chance to check it on side so it would have been guessing.

I will be there soon again. Hopefully I have more time to check the area beyond the barrier/gate. Than I will try to update it as needed too.
Lee Carré (2022-02-23 11:04:07+00:00): 👍
Lee Carré (2022-02-24 12:12:26+00:00): For (my own) future reference: http://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/13740
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:30:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033419593#map=19/50.87448/16.61907

tu też dublujesz landuse=farmland przy pomocy landuse=orchard
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:30:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033419595

te drogi to service=driveway
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:24:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033420519#map=17/50.87590/16.62385

nawet się nie postarałeś wyciąć landuse=farmland tylko tworzysz nakładające się wielokąty landuse
danieldegroot2 (2022-02-20 15:22:14+00:00): Hey Martin,

Zou je nog even willen kijken naar het volgende?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289786591/history
is gesloopt (vergelijk PDOK en Esri)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2933268623/history
Adres Zijleiland 1A is nu historisch

Kanttekeningen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289786555/history
is gesloopt (vergelijk PDOK en Esri Clarity)

Ten noorden zijn een of meer 'gebouwen' er bij gekomen
(enige in BAG heeft ID 0546100000061043 )

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52964986/history
komt overigens uit 3dshapes en betreft een woonboot, waarbij het adres Zijleiland 3 zou horen en de geometrie van het water gecorrigeerd zou kunnen worden.

Als iniedergeval het eerste item bekeken is kan de note wel dicht
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3056780

Groet,

Daniel
Martin Borsje (2022-02-20 15:26:54+00:00): wat verwijderd kan worden kun je zelf natuurlijk. wat blijft er daarna nog over?
Leo Slager (2022-02-20 17:45:03+00:00): Dank voor de import en de overige aanwijzingen. Die woonboot had ik over het hoofd gezien :-(
marczoutendijk (2022-02-20 20:42:06+00:00): Hi,
Are you aware that your edits are done on a real map visible to everyone?
Please stop doing your childish changes of the work of other mappers, or you risk that we have to block your account.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
abakus_uploader (2022-02-20 23:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tastrax (2022-04-13 04:10:33+00:00): There is no physical divide on the approach to the airport roundabout on Kennedy Drive so there is no need for dual ways (Mapillary imagery available)
RicoElectrico (2022-02-24 20:04:20+00:00): Cześć, trzeba też poprawić adresy. Tu można sprawdzić przypadek, gdy adres nie ma w pobliżu ulicy z taką samą nazwą: http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#17/50.66605/18.90951

Jeśli potrzebujesz pomocy - napisz :)
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:25:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389018310#map=19/50.85528/16.60493

pole jest pod domem mieszkalnym?
Mordechai23 (2022-02-20 09:53:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033433278

dodałeś drogę z tracktype=* ale bez highway=*
Warin61 (2022-02-20 22:52:05+00:00): Hi,

This one too fails PTV2 .. see 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=149.79565&lat=-34.69624&zoom=10&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
Warin61 (2022-02-20 22:48:59+00:00): Hi,
This fails for public transport version 2... 
Unordered gap in ways
Stop not on way
unknown role...

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=149.89453&lat=-33.22812&zoom=9&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
Warin61 (2022-02-28 04:55:29+00:00): These errors should be fixed.
Vintage Rail Journeys (2022-02-28 07:18:14+00:00): Sure. I've tried to and failed.
Warin61 (2022-03-01 02:32:50+00:00): Ok... The Golden West Rail Tour basic issues.
stops;
1) stop at the start not present.
2) stops are not in order
3) werris ck plat 1 only shown. Is plat 2 used? 
4) all stops included? 

ways;

5) does not start at the beginning
6) trip up to Patterson done, but no return ways included, similar for other spurs .. the return needs to be included. 

7) does not finish at the end
Vintage Rail Journeys (2022-03-04 05:51:12+00:00): Thanks for your help with this,

OK, I don't know how to edit these things. Should I delete all or start again, or is there an editor you can recommend?

1) the start is at Central, there is a stop there.
2) how do you order stops?
3) Werris Ck plat 2 is not used.
4) Stops to be reviewed

ways;
5) how do I re-order ways - the standard editor doesn't provide any data at all
6) I couldn't see how to nominate the direction of a way for Farley Triangle-Paterson/Wallerawang-Kandos
7) how do I nominate where the route finishes?