piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pra_veen (2021-04-14 04:35:51+00:00): Hi mapper,
found overlapping primary Highways
way 928083442
way 928083434
way 928083435
way 928083432
way 928083436
way 928083439
way 928083431
way 928083433
way 928083438,
which is already later fixed by mapper MarcyAve.
Kindly check with the corrected changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102645777
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102609459
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
user_5359 (2021-04-10 16:46:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key building instead buildingqq
user_5359 (2021-04-09 14:13:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.osm.org.

Please have also a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Whitewater_sports
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
pra_veen (2021-04-12 11:32:05+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with node 8621711948
and the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102799822
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102610449
pra_veen (2021-04-12 11:28:17+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with service road 
kindly check with way 92811048
way 92811131 ,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102799480
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102610484
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
maraf24 (2021-07-28 10:47:31+00:00): Jaki jest powód usunięcie Stokrotki?
maraf24 (2021-07-28 10:49:07+00:00): https://stokrotka.pl/nasze-sklepy/jasienica-1533-5205.html
!bm (2021-04-10 08:15:39+00:00): s Anm / analog zu https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/102662889

hier: start_date=* - Syntax!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
ash_win (2021-04-14 07:27:48+00:00): Hi chiufengping,
Fixed the Overlapping ways as unclassified ways overlapping with residential way 311581563,kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102909315
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102611923
user_5359 (2021-04-10 06:09:37+00:00): May I ask you to help me? Do you know the meaning of the three keys
Color=4
S57Node=BCNSPP
Shape=2
These were entered seven years ago and the person who entered them has not been active since then. Could it be that this marks a (green ?) beacon?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Becky Candy (2021-05-10 19:54:43+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102612710
Frans S (2021-05-04 13:37:07+00:00): Hello 3iyi Thanks for mapping here 
A request. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key when still stelected. 
Best regards and keep mapping.
pra_veen (2021-04-12 11:03:44+00:00): Hi mapper,
joined the disconnected footways ,as per the ground truth. Kindly check with the way 928106046 way 928106044 way 928106045,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102613523
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102613523
pra_veen (2021-04-12 10:57:22+00:00): Hi mapper,
fixed incorrect alignment of unclassified road, as per the ground truth. Kindly check with the way 928106496,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102796957
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102613577
pra_veen (2021-04-12 10:50:17+00:00): Hi mapper,
fixed incorrect alignment of service, as per the ground truth. Kindly check with the way 928107408, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102796493
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102613774
ash_win (2021-04-14 05:40:48+00:00): Hi bchen_m,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 438039333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102901650
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102613835
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-30 19:45:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105581855 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:46:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
!bm (2021-04-10 07:47:26+00:00): s Anm / analog zu https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/102662889

denomination="lutheran (high_church)" 

Der Mix von Leerzeichen und Unterstrich scheint mir nicht die beste Idee zu sein. 

Taginfo: 8x - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/denomination=lutheran%20(high_church)
user_5359 (2021-04-10 16:57:09+00:00): Hallo! Bitte Sieh Dir mal die neueste Version Deines Schlauchomat an, die Notation der Währung und des Zahlungsmittel entsprach nicht ganz dem Standard.
silversurfer83 (2021-04-10 19:34:46+00:00): Danke :)
War ein Versuch einen POI mittels OSMand zu erstellen und das hilft bei den Tags nicht so mit.
pra_veen (2021-04-12 10:21:34+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with node 8621470939 ,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102794374
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102615837
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Noen (2021-04-09 11:57:19+00:00): Hei! Stien du la til finnes fra før. Prøv heller å legge til egenskaper til den eksisterende. Vil du ikke tagge hele stien må du splitte den først.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
literan (2021-04-09 16:31:31+00:00): и зачем вы дубли вносите? уже есть эти объекты. Откат
pra_veen (2021-04-12 10:14:38+00:00): Hi Mapper,
fixed the crossing residential highway as per the ground truth.
kindly check with way 633388940 ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102793560
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102617530
pra_veen (2021-04-12 09:57:00+00:00): Hi mapper,
I have found crossing highways way 927002534
way 29274655, which was later fixed by the user Timmy_Tesseract . Kindly check with the corrected changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102781717
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102617878
literan (2021-04-09 16:27:45+00:00): и зачем здание удалили? откат
pra_veen (2021-04-12 09:32:20+00:00): Hi Mapper,
fixed the overlapping footway highways as per the ground truth. 
kindly check with way 587354601 ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102790554
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102618555
pra_veen (2021-04-12 08:39:17+00:00): Hi mapper,
fixed incorrect classification of highway way 824139597, Kindly check with the corrected changeset 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102786297
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102619344
NieWnen (2021-04-09 14:16:37+00:00): Zamiast pisać "pewnych rzeczy" można wymienić jakich np. parkingi, wtedy nazwa edycji jest czytelniejsza.
Proszę o nie łączenie tak parkingów z drogą oraz nienakładanie chodnika na krawędź np. parkingu, ciężko się potem cokolwiek poprawia.
Do parkingu wystarczy dodać parking=street_side i wszystko w porządku i nie musi być przyczepiony, albo jeśli widać bardzo dobrze miejsca parkingowe, można oznaczać jako parking_space.

W tym konkretnym przypadku to ja w ogóle nie widzę tutaj parkingu. Jeśli jest tam znak, który pozwala na parkowanie  po lewej/prawej stronie jezdni to oznacza się to jeszcze inaczej jako parking:lane https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:parking:lane
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102619539
MichałPL02 (2021-06-14 12:28:14+00:00): Dziękuję za rady
!bm (2021-04-09 15:07:54+00:00): Hey Mateusz Konieczny,

why species:wiki*? This should be genus:wiki*, right?

--bestregards!bm
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-09 16:14:42+00:00): Yes, you are right :(

genus:* may be more fitting

BTW, what is the correct tagging for subspecies/breeds?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-09 16:17:05+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102657102
!bm (2021-04-09 18:53:41+00:00): Thanks! 

Maybe one could also use more general taxon=*[1] when in doubt?

ad 
> BTW, what is the correct tagging for subspecies/breeds?

Good question. Are breeds (e.g of dogs[2], which seems controversial[3]) covered by the biological taxonomy?[4] (Does not seem to be the case, if I understand this correctly.)

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy_(biology)#Kingdoms_and_domains
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 18:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104074885 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
manoj@123 (2021-04-09 08:16:23+00:00): Added Destination Sign as seen from Mapillary/KartaView #MSFTOpenMaps

Mapillary;Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102620042
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:55:15+00:00): Hi yasmin_m0,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 426571091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102809161
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102620220
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:51:02+00:00): Hi Kang Lih,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 311683996
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102808645
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102620438
pra_veen (2021-04-12 08:07:57+00:00): Hi Mapper,
fixed the overlapping residential highways as per the ground truth. 
kindly check with way 178611720 ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102783433
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102620483
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 21:58:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103593119, 103592254 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
pra_veen (2021-04-12 07:42:41+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with node 50734324 ,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102780836
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102621658
pra_veen (2021-04-12 07:22:19+00:00): Hi mapper,
found incorrect classification of highway 
way 245151526,way 245151525 
and later fixed by the user d00i , Kindly check with the corrected changeset 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102737075 
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102621821
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:47:11+00:00): Hi Kang Lih,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 828612365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102808645
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102621958
osmviborg (2021-04-09 09:00:46+00:00): Hej. Hvad prøver du på at vise her?
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 09:17:05+00:00): Det skulle gerne visse at Strandager er en blind vej Samme markering som der er vist for enden af nabovejen Havretoften
osmviborg (2021-04-09 09:29:53+00:00): Er vejen lukket ud mod Hyllingebjergvej, og i så fald hvordan. Der er ikke forhindringer at se på luftfoto.
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 09:47:08+00:00): prøv at zoome ind på google maps, uden baggrundskort, så kan man se at det er Æblestien og ikke Strandager. Kør evt. forbi og se vejskiltet på Strandager som viser blind vej.
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 09:47:45+00:00): at det er Æblesien som forbinder ud til Hyllingebjergvej
osmviborg (2021-04-09 10:04:42+00:00): Min ref. er denne https://imgur.com/C6JsT5z billedet er et år gammelt. Du er lokalkendt, så du må vide hvordan der ser ud på stedet.
osmviborg (2021-04-09 10:09:22+00:00): Dette er det GeoDanmark, altså det officielle kort over Danmark: https://imgur.com/RYnEzqk
osmviborg (2021-04-09 10:58:43+00:00): Det her er fra Halsnæs Kommunes kort: https://imgur.com/0kU6K1V
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 17:31:33+00:00): det fremgår af kommunens kort over veje og stier at kun stien går igennem til Hyllingebjergvej.
osmviborg (2021-04-09 18:18:51+00:00): På den detaljerede visning, som jeg viste på sidste indlæg, ligger vej og sti oveni hinanden.
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 18:23:01+00:00): kan desværre ikke sende skærmbillede at kortet men kontakt evt. kommunen
Kvotelisen (2021-04-09 18:23:24+00:00): tak for interessen 

Slut herfra
andershl (2021-04-10 08:50:37+00:00): Jeg dapper hen og kigger.
andershl (2021-04-11 10:04:39+00:00): Ja, den er godtnok mærkelig. Der er fri gennemkørsel ad Strandager fra Hyllingebjergvej, men når man så kører ud på Jens Jensens Vej, er der skilt med blind vej. Det er mulligt, at der er planer om at lukke den, men OSM viser da faktiske forhold, så krydserne bør væk -  og shvis der så bliver lukket må det tagges korrekt og ikke med noexit..... Se billeder her https://photos.app.goo.gl/bGRMKM8LghjUiRTR9
osmviborg (2021-04-11 10:27:40+00:00): Tak for hjælpen.
parsd51 (2021-04-11 21:51:01+00:00): Hej

Super med et kig på de lokale forhold.

Mit gæt er, i tråd med dig andershl, at planen er at vejen skal lukkes for motorkørsel (det forholdvis nye T-stiskilt ifht vejnavne-skiltet) pga. der køres/ledes via Strandager af f.eks:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=56.0047%2C11.9541%3B56.0108%2C11.9526

På Mapillary ser Hyllingebjergvej og Jens Jensensvej umiddelbart ud til at være asfalterede omkring Strandager.

Måske kan lidt asfalt/grusvej tagging rette lidt på det. 

Hilsen
parsd51
andershl (2021-04-12 09:12:32+00:00): Jep, jeg sætter lige vejoverflader på...
Palolo (2021-04-09 15:32:06+00:00): Thank you for your efforts to map Tanzania. Please note that buildings should only be mapped once and have accurate outlines with square corners.
Frans S (2021-05-08 14:43:22+00:00): Hello, I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance
see the Comment on the Task Manager.
Rom1 (2021-04-09 17:46:47+00:00): Bonsoir, j'ai restauré le bâti en changeant la valeur "yes" par "shed" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dshed
NieWnen (2021-04-09 14:22:22+00:00): Nie mapujemy budynków po dachach, a od podstawy. W edytorze ID jest dostępna warstwa "Ewidencja budynków", można ją włączyć po prawej stronie, która wyświetli kontury budynku. Czasem może sprawiać mylne wrażenie, że wygląda inaczej, ale w końcu na ortofotomapie widzimy dach, a nie podstawę. 
Nie przyczepiałbym również budynków do obszaru (garages).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102623238
MichałPL02 (2021-05-19 17:37:08+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagi. :)
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:42:00+00:00): Hi Kang Lih,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 832084028
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102808352
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102623315
pra_veen (2021-04-12 04:12:08+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 759383442 ,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102767208
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102623501
TF300 (2022-01-03 09:08:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Dann machst du den anderen Mappern ein Gefallen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:35:24+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can you explain what the source of your change is here?  
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:35:28+00:00): 안녕하십니까,
여기 OSM 데이터 워킹 그룹의 Andy가 있습니다.
여기에 변경의 원인이 무엇인지 설명할 수 있습니까?
친애하는,
앤디
UNGSC-Jrachi (2021-04-10 12:09:55+00:00): Ciao.
Dove lo hai pescato questo 100L?
Dal wms coincide in parte col percorso 144
lucadelu (2021-05-27 13:20:55+00:00): Scusa Ivo se rispondo solo ora, è a causa dei dati vecchi che sono sul drive condiviso CAI, sarebbe molto utile poter utilizzare direttamente il WMS aggiornato
Jrachi (2021-05-27 13:29:55+00:00): Ok.
Ci sono alcuni settori che negli ultimi anni hanno subito delle rinumerazioni.
Me ne occupo io.
Ivo
Arlo James Barnes (2021-04-15 01:57:04+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM!

I changed the URL of your homepage from the http:// version to the https:// one since the first one didn't seem to work.

I'll definitely grab a growler next time I'm in town! 👀 In the meantime if you have any questions about OSM, the local community hangs out in the #local-newmexico channel on https://slack.openstreetmap.us; thanks for contributing to the map.
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:27:03+00:00): Hi LinChunYu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 853564089
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102807268
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102625700
PT-53 (2021-04-10 05:45:50+00:00): service=driveway ?
mathpras (2021-04-12 09:23:56+00:00): Hi PT-53,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added highway=service as I am not sure of the type of the entity it is leading to. Thanks for the feedback. please find the changeset(102789804) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community
Regards,
mathpras
pra_veen (2021-04-12 04:00:12+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 841149720 ,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102766709
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102626185
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:23:10+00:00): Hi LinChunYu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 853564091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102807268
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102626272
BCNorwich (2021-04-09 10:56:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag lane_markings=no is not necessary in OSM as in the absence of positive lane tagging (number of lanes and/or lanes forward and/or lanes backward) it is implied that there are no lanes marked. The tag lane_markings=no is not recognized and can't be really be rendered anyway. If you need to indicate lane_markings=no it can be done in a description or note tag but it's not necessary.

Regards Bernard.