piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Øukasz (2017-08-17 10:38:11+00:00): Please refer to the wiki for tagging instructions:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

In particular:

"Multipolygon Baldo Forest: do not include the object type or other OSM terminology, if it does not apply outside of OSM"

This means that you should write:

"name: sere village"

but rather:

"name: sere"
"place: village"
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-13 17:13:48+00:00): Introduced in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50730504
Myazyk (2018-06-08 13:59:10+00:00): Не треба писати "лавка" - то ні до чого. До того ж то не є лавкою
Володимир Михайлюк (2018-06-08 18:41:06+00:00): Лавка - це місцева назва підвісного мосту
Myazyk (2018-06-09 12:37:57+00:00): Таких діалектних слів типу "лавка", "шопа" на карті не потрібно вказувати. І таких як "брід" теж не потрібно
Myazyk (2018-06-09 12:40:13+00:00): Це ж стосується і "гряди"
BeKri (2017-08-14 14:46:14+00:00): Servus,
die PLZ von St. Johannes der Evangelist ?
Fehlt da eine Stelle ?
mavl (2017-08-14 17:29:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org]. 
  
Спасибо за добавление данных.  
  
Вы добавили для аптеки название "Аптека". На самом деле это не название, а вид объекта. Такие названия не нужно добавлять в OpenStreetMap. Подробнее о названиях можно прочитать в статье [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F].

Также номер телефона нужно указывать в международном формате, например +7 3452 342705 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone].  
  
В России в качестве символа номера используют знак №, а не #.  
  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
Myazyk (2018-06-08 13:47:47+00:00): Якщо тут є дитсадок, то не треба видаляти, що є будівля і наносити, що то просто територія, на якій є дитсадок
Myazyk (2018-06-08 13:45:57+00:00): Нащо дублювати назву школи?
Myazyk (2018-06-08 13:58:26+00:00): "Клуб" - то є народна назва, її на карту наносити не треба
Myazyk (2018-06-08 13:57:49+00:00): Не потрібно повторювати назви, які вже нанесені!
До того ж для сільських/міських рад є теґ amenity=townhall і не треба ставити office=administrative
whb (2017-08-14 10:43:12+00:00): note="Neubau frei gezeichnet" scheint mir jetzt nicht mehr passend.
Außerdem frage ich mich, warum die Adressen entfernt wurden?
Waren diese nicht richtig?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115109/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115108/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115110/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115111/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115106/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115107/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115113/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4357115112/history
aikon (2017-08-14 12:24:10+00:00): note= ist so nicht richtig.

Adressen stehen bei Bing nicht, folglich kann ich sie nur raten. Ohne die Eingänge und Hausnummern zu kennen wären Einträge zu 99% falsch.

Es handelt sich um Neubauten die nicht den alten Gebäuden entsprechen.
whb (2017-08-14 13:44:09+00:00): Wegavision war vor Ort, entfernte danach die alten Gebäude und zeichnete den Neubau frei ein ("Neubau frei gezeichnet"), da es noch keine aktuellen Bing-Bilder gab.
Die Hausnummern hat er bei dieser Gelegenheit natürlich auch gleich mit erfasst.
Desweiteren hat er sogar seinen Besuch vor Ort dokumentiert, siehe z.B. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/EwfcibavRbPwTQy5_x-3Iw
whb (2017-08-14 10:35:57+00:00): Auf den alten Bing-Bildern (jetzt siehe Mapbox-Satellitenbild), sieht es mir eher so aus, als verliefe der untere Teil des Weges ca. 20m weiter südöstlich?
Oder basiert die Eintragung auf Vorortkenntnissen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515326598
aikon (2017-08-14 16:17:39+00:00): War heute vor Ort und habe es entsprechend angepasst.
bdiscoe (2017-08-14 06:19:20+00:00): Dguillen, it looks like you accidentally "squared" and uploaded a very long tertiary route here, which destroyed its geometry.  Please be careful!  You should ask an experienced mapper how to undo your changeset, or manually fix the road you mangled.
bdiscoe (2017-08-15 07:46:04+00:00): I have gone ahead and reverted this changeset and fixed all the geometry and topology it broke.
joaquin111 (2017-08-14 16:44:52+00:00): Real State in Algeciras
www.elijocasa.es
AH72 (2017-08-13 20:13:02+00:00): Not sure exactly what to do or say.. but did about 196 buildings. Hope this worked!
user_5359 (2017-08-26 19:03:34+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast keinen Beschreibung an Deinen Punkt gesetzt (der Changeset Kommentar zählt nicht). 
Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
Myazyk (2018-06-08 14:33:49+00:00): Там справді є цвинтар біля шкільного саду?
І сад справді шкільний, ато він шось далеченько від школи?
Володимир Михайлюк (2018-06-08 18:39:38+00:00): Є два сади і два шкільні! Один біля школи інший біля нового кладовища через річку.
І є нове кладовище.
mor (2017-08-14 11:56:00+00:00): El bar Guzzo ya lo añadiste hace 3 días
saikabhi (2017-08-14 05:32:19+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Why are you adding fictional waterways to the map? Please do not do that. Reverting your changes.

Thanks
Abhishek
opendcc (2022-05-12 14:29:39+00:00): Hallo, Dein Weg ist am unteren Ende not connected. Absicht?
geow (2022-05-12 20:10:29+00:00): Muss ich mal morgen meine Tracks anschauen, vermutlich zu verbinden ;)
opendcc (2022-05-12 20:36:40+00:00): Na, vielleicht war eine große Lücke im Weg und grad ein Hubschrauber in der Nähe ... Vielleicht kannst Du ja die Note auch ansehen. Unserem Saufbruder im Unterwössen habe ich mal alle wieder zugemacht.
geow (2022-05-13 21:05:54+00:00): Ich habe den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515347061 nur bis zur cutline eingetragen. 6 Wochen später hat ein gewisser "geou" (nicht ich!) den Weg südlich der cutline ergänzt mit cutting=yes womit vermutlich der Verlauf in der Schneise/cutline gemeint war: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529167131 Für mich ist eine cutline aber per se kein Weg, deshalb habe ich nix eingetragen.
Auch der lt HInweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3170323 nicht mehr erkennbare Weg stammt von geou: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529167131

Beste Grüße
geow
colgza (2017-08-13 20:33:15+00:00): Correction:  I meant to say "Added footpaths".
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:37:06+00:00): Olá, Antonius.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:32:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51092586
naoliv (2017-08-16 19:32:46+00:00): magacima, existe um padrão para classificar as rodovias no Brasil.
Por exemplo, você está alterando vários trechos que não possuem pavimentação para uma via primária (o que não está correto).
Dê uma lida em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_to_map_a#Classifica.C3.A7.C3.A3o_de_vias ou entre em contato com a comunidade, caso tenha dúvidas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Alecs01 (2017-08-14 07:29:55+00:00): Hi, I believe there is no waterfall there, did you mean something like this? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Drinking_Water
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-02 22:35:48+00:00): Was ist denn http://osm.org/node/5033143830 Lustiges - ein Bahnübergang ohne übergehende Straße? Etwas südlich ist noch eine.
Lokai (2018-03-03 06:30:12+00:00): Möglicherweise ein Bedarfsübergang aus vergangenen Tagen. Weg verschwunden auf Grund von Flubereinigung oder anderes. Auf Bing Luftbild erkennt man das dort baulich etwas am Gleis ist.
Mirasolera (2018-07-13 16:09:44+00:00): Hola Marcos, que es el Yaguarete Cua? Lo puedes explicar porfavor?
GinaroZ (2017-08-14 00:01:00+00:00): Hi, can I ask why you've removed the suburb node? And just wondering if you plan on removing the others from Edinburgh as well?
yurasi (2017-08-14 12:38:41+00:00): Hi GinaroZ
I only used "Replace geometry" plugin of JOSM . Where I selected the node with the place area and made click in this plugin, this way the tags into the node were added to place area. I made this because on the map was rendered two names, one of the node and other of the place area. I would like to know if you are agree with this. I'm researching how resolve different cases where  there are many duplicated places in OpenStreetMap,which is not really good, and generates confusion.
GinaroZ (2017-08-15 13:03:22+00:00): Thanks for the reply. The problem now is that the name is not rendered on the standard map! :)
All of the suburbs in Edinburgh are mapped with a node and area. I agree that a solution needs to be found with place areas and a label node.
I will revert this changeset to put the node  back.
◪ Jarv (2017-08-17 10:34:51+00:00): Thanks for fixing this, this area has been bugging me for a while and after quite a bit of research I finally found out it is a spur of the A272, I come back to do it and someone already had!
B1000 (2017-09-01 15:37:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vous contact suite à votre modélisation d'une partie de l'école Jacqueline.

Il y a peu j'ai repris l'intégralité des mailles Catherine et Jacqueline avec relevés sur terrain pendant plusieurs heures.

Aujourd'hui, je constate le rajout de bâtiment qui ont été détruit à ce jour. Vous devriez vérifier d'autres sources avant d'effectuer des modifications, d'autant plus que le quartier de Hautepierre est, niveau urbanisme, comme neuf puisqu'il a été réorganisé par l'extension du tramway A de Strasbourg en 2013-2015

Sur Strasbourg je vous conseille d'utiliser le Calque d'imagerie BDOrtho IGN datant de 2015 et par la suite de vérifier sur terrain, ou même par google Earth (dans une autre fenêtre) qui a des images de 2016 !

Donc merci de vérifier vos informations avant de modifier le travail des personnes qui en plus détails la carte jusqu'à la clôture !

Cordialement

B1000
bigbonedbob (2017-09-02 20:37:37+00:00): Bonjour

Oui effectivement, d'autant plus que je suis passé sur place semaine dernière pour vérifier. J'avais prévu de rectifier le tir courant de la semaine prochaine durant mes congés. Merci et désolé pour le boulot supplémentaire.

Boris
DD1GJ (2017-08-14 08:22:46+00:00): Hallo editor31513, was verstehst Du unter "knowledge"? Bist Du durch den ganzen Ort gelaufen und hast jede einzelne Nummer notiert? Bezüglich der Lage waren einige Häuser vorher besser. Welche Quellen hast Du verwendet?
editor31513 (2017-08-14 09:15:52+00:00): Sorry, hatte hauptsächlich den BayernAtlas für die Hausnummern genutzt, dazu eigenes Wissen und die bayerischen Satellitenbilder. Was wäre denn in dem Fall als Quelle angebracht?
DD1GJ (2017-08-14 09:37:35+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Eine direkte Übernahme aus dem BayernAtlas ist leider absolut tabu. Der Rechteinhaber, also das Landesamt für Digitalisierung, Breitband und Vermessung, hat sich in der Vergangenheit bereits darüber beschwert. OSM will einen wirklich freien Datenbestand aufbauen und respektiert daher bestehende Urheberrechte. Eine Nutzungsgenehmigung gibt es nur für das Open Data Portal: https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/weitere/opendata.html

Es tut mir Leid für Deine Arbeit, aber vor allem die Hausnummern müssen zeitnah wieder raus. Ich schaue mir heute Abend alles nochmal gründlich an.
editor31513 (2017-08-14 10:10:32+00:00): Naja, also ein Teil der Hausnummern basiert auf meinem eigenen Wissen, weil ich dort regelmäßig vor Ort bin. Wäre es möglich, die restlichen Nummern erstmal zu entfernen und später nach und nach durch vorbeilaufen zu erfassen?
DD1GJ (2017-08-14 21:43:02+00:00): Im Prinzip ja. Aber regelmäßig Vorbeilaufen in der Vergangenheit bedeutet nicht automatisch, dass man die Hausnummern des ganzen Straßenzuges auswendig kennt. Bei mir hört das in meiner Nachbarschaft spätestens nach 10 Häusern auf. Dann muss ich auch bewusst hin- oder nachschauen. Kannst Du das sauber auseinanderhalten?

In Baden-Württemberg wäre das alles kein Problem gewesen, da dürfen wir mit Maps4BW die "Katasterkarte" mit den Hausnummern benutzen, haben aber im Gegensatz zu Bayern kein DOP. Andere Länder, andere Sitten ....
editor31513 (2017-08-14 21:51:08+00:00): Ok danke für die Infos. Dann mach ich das morgen mal.
Pavel47 (2017-08-19 18:04:39+00:00): Зачем менять operator у почтовых ящиков с "Почта России" на "ФГУП "Почта России""? Других Почт России ведь пока нет)
Alexander-II (2017-08-20 13:01:41+00:00): Без злого умысла, такой он забит в заготовках. Стоит откатить обратно на "Почта России"? :)
Pavel47 (2017-08-20 15:43:47+00:00): Откатывать не надо, поправил сам. Это плагин какой-то бюрократичный) Чем проще - тем лучше!
smaprs (2017-08-14 02:32:14+00:00): As vias ficaram desconectadas. Já fiz a correção.
smaprs (2017-08-14 02:34:17+00:00): Via sem denominação apenas não vai nada no campo nome (não vai como: "(sem denominação) [Viamão}")
raito (2017-08-21 10:54:18+00:00): Hi. I think it IS a road. Maybe not a residential road, but still a road. Or at least, was a road, maybe it is closed now.
wslerry (2017-08-21 11:06:45+00:00): i live nearby. Yes you are right,It was a road once. I think it is not right to give some wrong information to others. Tq.
Carnildo (2017-08-14 07:06:50+00:00): Where did you get the name "South H Street" from?  The name fits the pattern for the area, but I drove that road a couple months back and couldn't find a street sign anywhere.
Greg_Rose (2019-07-04 04:16:10+00:00): Sorry I missed this comment when you gave it - not sure how I missed it. 
As far as "South H St" goes, I was going off the original Spokane plat maps from 1895-1900. Found a great online resource with which I could trace the railroad right of way I was obsessed with at that time.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:36:44+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
GerdP (2017-09-04 08:36:09+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515397328
This looks like a highway=footway + bridge=yes. Please map also the footways/steps  that connect it with the road network.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:36:03+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 3 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:31:16+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 5 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:17+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 7 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Noen (2017-08-14 14:18:39+00:00): Hi!
You seem to have added public_transport=	platform to highway=bus_stop nodes that represent the bus stop as a whole, and not any particular platform, in addition to adding public_transport=platform tags where there already existed a public_transport=platform object.
Noen (2017-08-14 18:21:23+00:00): I do agreed that it would be better if all public_transport=platform was mapped separately, but sadly there aren't yet.

I will remove the public_transport=platform tag from the appropriate nodes.
Polyglot (2017-08-14 19:34:41+00:00): I'm not sure we understand each other very well, but OK. As far as I'm concerned. If there is a node next to the way tagged

highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform
bus=yes
name=
ref=
route_ref=
operator=

The stop is mapped. If there is an actual platform, it's great to map it as a way, but I wouldn't add those ways to the route relations. For that matter I wouldn't add the stop_positions to the route relations either, just the platform nodes, but for some reason that's not how it's on the wiki. I won't be mapping too much anymore in this region, so no worries. I mostly wanted to get an idea how bus stops and routes are mapped in different areas.
If you would feel like having a Hangout or Skype chat, I'm game.
Supaplex (2017-08-14 06:32:28+00:00): 好像有兩個站牌位置
台灣 J (2017-08-14 07:45:20+00:00): 因為就在自己住家附近，所以個人很確定就是雙向各 1 個站位無誤。
maxerickson (2017-08-15 15:32:40+00:00): Hi-

Watch out for the copy tags feature, it looks like you accidentally included a post office during this session: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51098333?node_page=3

I've checked using http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qZL and cleaned up the accidental ones in the Chicago area. You can use that map to check other areas you have edited, move the map and click "Run".


Max
SomeoneElse (2017-08-14 11:11:31+00:00): Hello - here you've deleted something that was previously a school - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23646951/history .  Was that correct or should that be reverted?
Best Regards,
Andy
oormilavinod (2017-08-14 11:21:14+00:00): hello, thank you so much for point his out. i have reverted the last change to yours . have a nice day :)
olehz (2017-08-14 09:01:20+00:00): 1. якщо одна єдина дорога веде до хутора чи якогось промислового обєкту, вона аж ніяк не може вважатися як highway=track, адже цим типом позначаються лише польовы дороги для тракторів і лісовозів в лісах. поверніть назад тип на highway=service

2. Не дуже зрозуміло навіщо ви виставляєте теги bicycle=no/yes. Вперше бачу аби по наших селах діяла заборона пересування не велосипедах. єдиною перешкодою для велосипеда можуть бути глибокі болота чи лісоповали. те саме стосується і тегів про піші пересування. це явна надлишковість, по замовчуванню воно завжди yes. виставляйте ці теги лише за увоми, якщо рух дійсно фізично неможливий.
Володимир Михайлюк (2017-08-14 09:19:15+00:00): 1. Там дорога дійсно тільки для тракторів і лісовозів. Але тип поверну
2. Я пишу лише там де не реально проїхати велосипедом.
olehz (2017-08-14 08:49:48+00:00): навіщо було видалено тег name:ru ?
Warin61 (2017-08-15 23:37:27+00:00): The building boundary (way in OSM terms) crosses itself ... that is an outside wall crosses over another outside wall ... 
I have fixed this - try not to do it again?
Warin61 (2017-08-15 23:45:27+00:00): How did you come to tag these as "landuse=residential" ?

They are buildings! Tag them building=house in these cases.
aharvey (2017-08-29 12:06:27+00:00): @Warin61, this is just my opionion here but this is @Nhadaya's first edit to OSM and I feel your comment could have been worded in a slightly more welcoming way.

@Nhadaya welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing, you can check out the beginners guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

As Warin mentioned about how to map houses, you might want to check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building which shows how different building types can be mapped in OSM.

It looks like the ones you mapped have been fixed up by others, but something you can try for next time.
Warin61 (2017-08-29 23:22:04+00:00): Did not mean to put you off Nhadaya. But this is the second instance I found of this kind of thing occurring .. so I would like to know how you came to tag them as landuse=residential. That may help avoid further confusion?
Myazyk (2018-06-08 14:00:14+00:00): Не треба писати "брід" - є відповідні теґи, які це позначають на карті
Chieftl (2017-09-12 12:39:10+00:00): Добрий день
Уточніть будь-ласка якщо вам відомо, як відбувається перетин вул. Ю. Гагаріна і потоку Чипнівський?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51099583#map=19/49.16369/23.33765
Схоже, що зараз там тільки пішохідний місток
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151135260@N07/36371394013
Можливо, є інший міст чи брід на сусідній дорозі?
Тоді варто з'єднати вулицю з ним.
Володимир Михайлюк (2017-09-12 12:51:09+00:00): Добрий день!
Там є і брід і пішохідний місток
Chieftl (2017-09-12 12:59:10+00:00): Дякую, тоді я внесу зміни, перенаправлю вулицю через брід, а через місток залишиться пішохідна стежка.
Myazyk (2018-06-08 14:54:51+00:00): Дзвіниця, а не дзвільниця!
GOwin (2017-11-06 11:15:43+00:00): Hi Ernie. 

It would be some to lose any of this work. However, OpenStreetMap is a live map that is used not just by regular people like you and me, but also by people who are involved in disaster and humanitarian response.

It is important to keep the data correct, and accurate, as much as possible. 

Kindly contact us, if you need any help with the edits. Try us at fb.com/OSMph/community
GOwin (2017-11-06 11:10:40+00:00): Hi again. Again, we notice the same issues with your other change sets.

If you enjoy tracing linear imagery (like highways, waterways, etc.), kindly make sure you add only new data , and not overwrite or duplicate existing ones. It would be sad to lose your edits with reverts. 

I suggest you look for fresh areas where you can trace new highways and waterways. 

Let us know if you need help. We have people ready to answer your questions at fb.com/OSMph/community
GOwin (2017-11-06 10:55:02+00:00): Hi Ernie. Welcome to OSM, and thank you for the contribution.

This way (line) though is unnecessary, and overlays on an already mature and valid way feature.

You need to make sure that you load the already existing objects, before you attempt to digitize aerial imagery.

If you need help, you can ask questions at fb.com/OSMph/community
zstadler (2017-09-26 11:32:47+00:00): Hi Nadav,

Please note that OSM used the "colour" tag rather than "color".
zstadler (2021-07-11 20:38:12+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52382329
GOwin (2017-11-06 11:03:23+00:00): Hi again, Ernie.

You seem to be doing a lot of similar edits, but  overlaying them on existing data. You need not create new highways over existing ones, or you could add additional information, or change their geometry.

If you need some self-paced learning reference, try www.learnosm.org to understand the basics of OpenStreetMap editing.

For help, or questions, try the fb.com/OSMph/community group.
olehz (2017-08-14 08:32:57+00:00): не треба додавати тип обєкту як власну назву. типу "озеро, ліс, кладовище і т.п." - це надлишкове засмічення