piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hungerburg (2020-06-01 07:35:14+00:00): Ich hab den PB ja dazu angestiftet, das zu versuchen. So wie von Dir beschrieben, ist es freilich kein /unnecessary split/. Die Brücke liegt auf dem Rohr drauf.
StephaneP (2020-06-03 16:40:46+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,

Les bandes cyclables que tu ajoutes sur Cergy, ce sont des vraies nouvelles bandes cyclables, ou bien des bandes "covid" ?

A bientôt

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
mariotomo (2022-09-17 22:37:22+00:00): just saw your finely detailed mapped "simple suspension" bridge Way: 810047123, and must say I'm quite impressed of all the details I never considered adding. :-)
user_5359 (2020-05-31 05:14:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
PT-53 (2020-05-31 07:14:19+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
Du hast an der Haldenstraße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55654590/history
versehentlich das Merkmal
highway=residential
gelöscht, weshalb auch die Warnung "warnings:disconnected_way:highway" angezeigt wurde.
Ich habe das Merkmal wieder ergänzt.
Grüße
Matthias Frank (2020-06-02 20:30:09+00:00): Hallo Peter,
ich weiß auch nicht, wie ich mich da wieder einmal "verklickt" habe und damit das Merkmal Highway gelöscht wurde. Sorry dafür, und vielen Dank für das Reparieren des Schadens... Grüße von Matthias
jmilot (2020-12-10 18:44:46+00:00): Hi,

I've been browsing your sidewalk edits in the last few months. Would it be possible to also add crossings at each street corners (marked and unmarks) when doing so? Otherwise, those kind of edits break most walk trip planner based on OSM, because there is no connection between sidewalks at street corners and result in large unnecessary detours. 

Thanks !
Reclus (2020-05-31 10:17:54+00:00): Hallo! Das ist schon besser als deine ersten Edits gestern, aber diverse Tags solltest du nicht setzen. monitoring:* ist für Sensoren, die zählen o.ä., aber nicht für Kameras. Auch name=Kamera solltest du nicht setzen. name=* ist nur für tatsächliche Namen. Wenn du eine deutschsprachibge Beschreibung ergänzen willst (die aber überflüssig ist), dann kannst du description=* setzen.
mikkolukas (2020-05-30 20:51:15+00:00): alternative source:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Mike Baggaley (2020-06-03 10:40:47+00:00): Hi, is the ref for this road really X2 or is it a mistake? Shouldn't it be A8?

Cheers,
Mike
mikkolukas (2020-05-30 20:51:24+00:00): alternative source:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
mikkolukas (2020-05-30 20:51:38+00:00): alternative source:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
user_5359 (2020-06-01 05:19:34+00:00): Hello! the tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag. 
Additional hint: Please use mixcased value for name and address values.
Yvemalongo (2020-06-01 07:01:52+00:00): Thanks a lot
osmviborg (2020-05-31 05:29:41+00:00): Gælder i kommunen: 'Fra den 1. maj til og med den 31. august er hver anden gadelampe helt slukket. Efter denne periode vil hver anden gadelampe være slukket i tidsrummet fra ca. kl. 22.00 til ca. kl. 06.00'.
user_5359 (2020-06-01 05:47:07+00:00): Hallo! Kleiner Hinweis: In Deutschland wird für die Adresse addr:country statt addr:state verwendet (addr:state wäre in diesem Fall auch Bayern bzw. die entsprechende Abkürzung (m.W. nach BY))
pio2_122 (2020-05-31 11:18:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że zmieniłeś oznaczenie ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych z highway=path	na footway. Niestety, jest to błąd. Według osm-wiki tag highway=path w takim przypadku jest wskazane. Zobacz na sekcję "Użycie uniwersalnych tagów": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=path?uselang=pl

Dodatkowo zauważyłem, że oznaczasz krawężniki jako kerb=*, curb=* lub inne podobne. To również jest nieprawidłowe. Zapewne korzystałeś z osm-wiki, gdzie był taki zapis ale * oznacza każdą używaną wartość, jest to używane tylko w definicjach na wiki. Wartości które są dostępne i powinny być używane są opisane w sekcji Tagowanie na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:kerb?uselang=pl

Mam prośbę, w wolnej chwili popraw to tutaj, ponieważ powstało teraz lekkie zamieszanie :)
Z góry dzięki!
Filal (2020-05-31 11:23:17+00:00): Masz jak najbardziej rację, zdałem sobie sprawę z tego po przesłaniu poprawki. Dzięki za czujne oko, przepraszam za zamieszanie. Dzisiaj poprawię.
pio2_122 (2020-05-31 11:29:22+00:00): Nie ma sprawy :)
Mimo wszystko, robisz świetną pracę!
Szczecinek był trochę "opuszczony", gdy mapowicz https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Vercyngetorix z jakiegoś powodu przestał działać, ale na szczęście znalazłeś się Ty i nadrabiasz zaległości na mapie :D
gscscnd (2020-05-31 06:40:14+00:00): Na zdjęciach Geoportalu budynek wydaje się mniejszy. Poza tym OK.
Hjart (2020-05-31 08:01:10+00:00): Jeg har oprettet sporet som relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11158810
Dette gør at det kommer med på bl.a. Waymarkedtrails: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11158810
og kan ses i Osmand
user_2066394 (2020-05-30 21:43:22+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85993646
henry44 (2020-05-31 07:46:18+00:00): Da ist keinerlei Einrichtung mehr. Bei einem einzelnen Gebäude OK, aber hier ist das nur eine leere Ecke.
user_2066394 (2020-05-31 09:41:30+00:00): eben dafür ist disused: gedacht. habs kurz nachgetragen
henry44 (2020-05-31 10:21:20+00:00): Laus OSM wiki:
"Mit dem Präfix "disused:" werden Objekte bezeichnet, die geschlossen, nicht mehr in Betrieb oder nicht in Benutzung sind. Eine Wiederinbetriebnahme ist relativ leicht möglich und kann geplant sein."
Da keinerlei Einrichtung vorhanden ist, ist eine Wiederinbetriebnahme als Friseurladen gerade nicht möglich. 
Ich habs kurz nachgetragen gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
kartler175 (2020-05-31 08:33:07+00:00): … und dabei geschlossenen Ring zerrissen: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.00857&lat=53.02777&zoom=13&opacity=1.00
JOSM hat einen Validator, der das melden würde, so man ihn benützt und beachtet.
.
kartler175 (2020-05-31 08:50:05+00:00): War vorher noch kapputter: http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%3Cosm-script%20output%3D%22xml%22%20date%3D%222020-05-30T20%3A34%3A40Z%22%3E%0A%20%20%0A%20%20%3Cunion%3E%0A%20%20%3Cid-query%20ref%3D%2211157839%22%20type%3D%22relation%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C!--bbox-query%20s%3D%2252.96094445269347%22%20w%3D%2213.978042602539062%22%20n%3D%2253.06061210860822%22%20e%3D%2214.234848022460938%22%2F--%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C!--user%20name%3D%22MelioraCogito%22%2F--%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C!--user%20name%3D%22Kartler175%22%2F--%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C!--has-kv%20k%3D%22type%22%20v%3D%22multipolygon%22%2F--%3E%0A%20%0A%20%20%3C%2Fid-query%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3Crecurse%20type%3D%22down%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%3C%2Funion%3E%0A%20%20%0A%20%20%20%20%0A%20%20%3Cprint%20mode%3D%22meta%22%20order%3D%22quadtile%22%2F%3E%0A%3C%2Fosm-script%3E
user_177389 (2020-05-31 10:04:53+00:00): Diese Relation wurde kürzlich erstellt und ist nicht fertig, da fehlt ein Segment. Die Anzeige von overpass turbo versucht, ein Polygon zu zeichnen, was zu diesen überkreuzenden Fragmenten führt. Im JOSM sieht man es besser und kann auch gleich die History bemühen. Bitte erst genauer recherchieren.
axelr (2020-08-31 09:05:24+00:00): Du hast die Landstraße Am Kreuzborn für jeglichen Verkehr gesperrt und Fußgänger auf 30km/h beschränkt. Diese Kombination ist unlogisch.
stop50 (2020-09-03 10:21:37+00:00): 30 km/h ist die Straße seit Jahren. Zu dem Zeitpunkt war es nicht möglich mit Fahrzeugen zu fahren, da es keine Möglichkeit gab an der Baustelle zu fahren.
camelCaseNick (2020-05-30 23:11:33+00:00): Hey,
why did you delete multiple name tags and the link to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15166148?
CamelCaseNick
muralito (2020-05-31 22:46:24+00:00): Hola. Convendria revisar el escript.
Mirá este nodo 6797616686
tekim (2020-06-07 22:31:24+00:00): Hi Brian, Thanks for the edits to OSM!  I am interested to know with whom at the county you are working.  I am trying to get permission from their GIS department to use their data as a reference when editing OSM, but so far I have not gotten a response.
Mike (tekim)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85994559
Brian Reavis (2020-06-11 01:22:27+00:00): Hey Mike, likewise! This particular feedback came via COTREX from one of their rangers, Zachary L. Cook, who's likely not too in the loop on GIS and permissions (but I could be wrong)
tekim (2020-06-11 22:18:42+00:00): Brian, It is great that you have the rangers interested in OSM!  The COTREX database is something in which I am interested.  Perhaps Zachary could provide us a contact from whom we could request permission to use in OSM as a reference when editing.  I generally find that OSM has the best trails data, but I did find that COTREX has some that OSM does not (I also found a trail in COTREX that doesn't exits - spent considerable time looking for it on the ground to no avail)
Mike
Brian Reavis (2020-06-11 22:33:36+00:00): I'm with the team in charge of COTREX data (Natural Atlas) and would be happy to fix / look into any inaccuracies you encounter. If you right-click on the map on COTREX and click "Submit Map Feedback", it'll come directly to us and we'll take a look!

As for the license of the data and permissions, I'd talk to Alex Alma with DNR. If you email dnr_cotrex@state.co.us, he'll see it and try to answer or will route to someone who can.
tekim (2020-06-11 23:14:41+00:00): That is fantastic!

I can't find the trail I had in mind.  Perhaps you folks already fixed it.  I did submit some other feedback.

I will email the address you provided asking for permission.
Reclus (2020-05-31 10:52:53+00:00): Du hast hier eingetragen, dass das ganze Gebäude von Freifunk EN verwaltet wird, was ja offensichtlich Unsinn ist.
redflag238 (2020-05-31 13:24:07+00:00): Hast du recht, sollte nur das Wlan sein.
Reclus (2020-05-31 10:42:04+00:00): Hallo! Kanaldeckel trägt man mit man_made=manhole ein. Auf keinen Fall mit name=*. Bitte schaue ins Wiki, wenn du Dinge eintragen willst, um keinen Unsinn einzutragen, den andere Leute nachbearbeiten müssen.
andygol (2020-06-02 20:26:18+00:00): Поредагував - тепер виправляй розриви дорожнього графу 😬
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85994778
AlexRiabtsev (2020-06-03 11:11:21+00:00): а де ті розриви подивитися?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85994778
lyctkel (2022-06-11 18:04:09+00:00): Hi marek kleciak,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328538936 ist building=rcc angegeben. Ich nehme an, es ist ein Schreibfehler und es ist building=retail oder building=yes gemeint.
Herzliche Grüsse,
lyctkel
user_2066394 (2020-05-30 23:25:37+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85995146
Radboss (2020-05-30 23:28:40+00:00): Ja, guter Punkt. Hatte ich gerade tatsächlich übersehen. Danke für den Hinweis!
soshial (2024-07-07 07:59:00+00:00): I wonder why you did put access=no for all these footpaths around here... Hmm.

For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546836024
Mark Martinec (2024-07-07 11:01:29+00:00): It wasn't me who put that tag on, it was Benđo Jušić about seven years ago (see history). I was just the last
one to touch these objects, keeping the access tag unchanged.

That tag is most likely unwarranted or wrong. The original tagger seems to be inactive for the last six years. Please just remove these tags, the park is public, even though it is next to a school.
AgusQui (2020-05-31 01:58:55+00:00): Buenas correcciones!, recién hablamos de estas ediciones en el chat de Telegram, por si te quieres unir https://t.me/osm_ar
Saludos!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 17:22:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DP24PH (2020-05-31 02:03:06+00:00): Kindly wait for further announcements from PH Department of Transportation regarding the possible Provincial Bus Route diversions.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-31 03:36:16+00:00): Thanks, but I think you don't have to be too polite, and make yourself sound like a foreigner, hehe. E, di ba GCQ na dyan?
treestryder (2020-06-06 02:05:18+00:00): Nice work.
Might consider using the less obvious, yet more detailed tag, building=detached .
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse
Andreas Hernandez (2026-05-20 16:15:30+00:00): Hola, porque subio el voltage de 132kv a 220kv? Todos los diagramas oficiales muestran que son 132kv?
mariotomo (2021-09-20 20:32:16+00:00): Hola Rick! quisieras revisar estos senderos? parece como si hubieras validado como 'highway' la grabación del GPS sin editar.  puede ser?
Rick Morales (2021-09-22 19:17:43+00:00): Hola Mario, ¿a cuáles vías y/o nodos específicamente te refieres? ¿Son todos los que están listados en este changeset?
mariotomo (2021-09-22 19:30:05+00:00): oops, ahora no me acuerdo.  reviso … bueno, mira, por ejemplo:
Nœud : 7798476696
Nœud : 7798476687
en ambos tienes ángulos/curvas que no se aprecian en la foto aérea y que me dejan pensar a una traza GPS importada directamente.  no digo que es así, pero así parece.
ff5722 (2020-06-26 08:33:59+00:00): Hi, I would recommend to draw a line (or preferably even 2 parallel lines [SHIFT+P tool]) and tag them with highway=construction + construction=motorway. This allows it to be easily upgraded once the road is completed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810100006
CENTRALHUB (2020-06-27 15:53:31+00:00): Hi, if the road is being constructed (you can see the from imagery), I will map in that way. However if I can only see the construction area (at the very early stage of road construction), I will map them with construct area because I don't want to guess how the road will go. And, this tries to remind contributors avoid mapping in those area because the Maxar Imagery is out of date. Thanks.
user_5359 (2020-06-01 19:00:21+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key IN_OSM?
CENTRALHUB (2020-06-02 16:39:03+00:00): It's added during my mapping work and it's useless. I will try to delete all of them.
user_5359 (2020-06-03 18:00:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/UFC.
CENTRALHUB (2020-06-03 18:47:41+00:00): Thanks. I will try to remove this tag
user_2008655 (2020-08-17 07:03:00+00:00): 我说，能别把津石高速的无极至石家庄段删掉么？你这编辑越界了啊
Frans S (2020-05-31 12:15:21+00:00): Hello Tariqca
I am reviewing your work here and see that you mapped so many highways which are not necessary to be mapped.
Please go through the guidelines of this project on the Slack channel and follow the guidelines.
It saves you and us (we have to remove all the unneeded mappings !) much mapping time
See this page
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
for an overview how and what to be mapped
Thanks and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-05-31 12:24:53+00:00): Hello
Another issue
Please correct the issues reported by the issue triangle on the right hand menu of the editor before uploading your work
This is the first validation.
Mike Baggaley (2020-06-03 13:40:53+00:00): Hi, way 115185781 seems to have an odd combination of access tags including access=permit, motor_vehicle=no and psv=yes. If the access (excluding foot and bike) is for public service vehicles and other motors with permits then you need motor_vehicle=permit and psv=yes with no overall access tag. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
gomedia91 (2020-06-03 17:29:38+00:00): Thanks for that. Have updated.
portalaventura (2020-06-01 21:08:09+00:00): Olá Isabela.
Quais os dias de funcionamento da UBS Simões Lopes? de Segunda à sexta-feira?
A tag opening_hours segue o descrito em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening hours, com isso não é preciso dizer que "não fecha ao meio dia". Já a tag opening_hours:covid19 é para o horário de funcionamento no período de pandemia se ele for diferente do horário de funcionamento normal. Acredito que seu valor, na verdade, é um número de telefone. Para tal se utiliza a tag phone ou a tag contact:phone.
Aqui um exemplo de mapeamento de uma UBS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327273779.
portalaventura (2020-06-01 21:09:17+00:00): Link correto da tag  opening_hours: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
ISABELLA KHAUAM MARICATTO (2020-06-02 16:59:58+00:00): Olá !!!
Será que poderia me passar seu contato para que pudesse me ajudar com algumas dúvidas?
Eu agradeço!
portalaventura (2020-06-03 03:07:14+00:00): Enviei uma mensagem para você, com formas de contato.

Outra possibilidade é participar do grupo de discussões sobre o OSM no RS que mantemos no Telegram (https://t.me/osmrs).
tastrax (2020-06-08 06:01:32+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
evo_evz (2020-06-08 08:26:46+00:00): Ok I see thanks heaps for letting me know.
limes11 (2020-06-01 13:23:00+00:00): This change is correct, thank you for that. 
May I ask which street view you are using that allows you to spot this? 
I could not find anything on mapillary or bing streetside, so I am wondering which other source there is.
This is no criticism, just pure interest.

Thank you!
srinatpa (2020-06-03 03:24:51+00:00): Hi Limes11,

Thanks for validating our edits. We have made this edit partially based on the driver feedback and avaialble resources. Please go through the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68933 for detailed understanding of the private imagery we are utilizing. Happy to contribute to the OSM and learn from the community

Thanks,
Srinatpa.
limes11 (2020-06-03 09:47:18+00:00): I understand. I was confused by the long list of "imagery_used" This is a bit misleading since you actually used none of these but only your private images. Not a big fan of this rather exclusive approach but it is for the sake of improving such map features, so I get the point. 

Thanks for the quick reply and clarification!
map93 (2020-07-10 01:58:27+00:00): Hi,

I noticed you marked John Findley Drive as a golf cart path in this changeset, which I'm a bit confused by. I don't think I've ever seen a golf cart using this road, and as far as I know, the golf=cartpath tag is for sidewalks within the golf course, not roads like this that are primarily intended for cars.

Is this road an official part of the course (meaning that you need to drive your cart on it to access parts of the course)?
DP24PH (2020-05-31 03:23:31+00:00): Change log: [FIX] Carmona Racing Circuit re-mapping, calibration based on Bing and Maxar imagery; and iD validation fixes (due to overlapping roadway and building)

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
Joey Samson (2020-06-01 11:38:50+00:00): Manila to taguig and Calamba to Los banos sides please
bikingaround244 (2022-01-21 18:18:03+00:00): for this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689216563/history) you changed to dismount for bicycles in this change set. I bike over this all the time I honestly thought this bridge was designed to be biked over. I dont see any signs that indicate dismount. I am just wondering where you are getting the dismount from.
bikingaround244 (2022-01-22 02:07:27+00:00): for this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810132947/history#map=19/42.36134/-71.07094 you have it marked as bicycles=no. I am going to change it to bicycles=yes. I bike on this daily to and from work and there is no indication that bikes are not allowed.
ovruni (2020-05-31 05:01:44+00:00): Hola
En esta edición se ha añadido la clave building=school [0] en áreas de un colegios grandes, la etiqueta con clave building es para identificar cada edificación de manera individual dentro de un colegio, mientras que la de amenity=school [1] es para todo el área del colegio, algunos colegios grandes puedes tener edificaciones, cancha de juego, piscina, etc, mientras que otros colegios pequeños pueden solo tener la edificación, puede ver un ejemplo gráfico de como mapear en la documentación de colegio. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dschool
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Peilscheibe (2020-05-31 08:16:35+00:00): Hallo 1733ndke62,

vielleicht war es ja ein Versehen, dass Du hier Informationen über Öffnungszeiten gelöscht hast. Ich habe das mal rückgängig gemacht.

Grüße, P.
1733ndke62 (2020-05-31 12:42:39+00:00): Am Sonntag hat der Vietz Markt (Rewe) geschlossen, ebenso hat die Metzgerei Lipp am Sonntag geschlossen. Rouff, Lipp und Vietz sind alle in einem Gebäude, doch nur die Bäckerei Rouff hat geöffnet.
eggie (2020-05-31 06:00:40+00:00): Lijkt me oke om het wat netter te leggen.
Die leisure zal wel ergens aan de landuse residential van de wijk vastzitten..  vandaar de grootte van je editgebied.
Bij station Bullewijk zag ik zwemmende bomen. Die heb ik even in een mp gezet.
Zal zo wel gaan renderen als eilandjes.
Eggie
boototter (2020-05-31 09:08:52+00:00): Dank daarvoor; tegen de tijd dat ik bij station Bullewijk terecht ben gekomen ziet het er daar heel anders uit. Een groot deel van het kantorengebied ten westen is of wordt residential met ombouw of sloop en nieuwbouw; de plannen voor het vlak west van Hoptille en de lang uitgestelde sloop van Heesterveld zijn ook al gepresenteerd; west van de spoorbaan in Duivendrecht al niet veel anders.
Gelukkig is er in Bijlmer-Oost nog veel te doen, dus ze mogen er rustig wat tijd voor nemen ;)
boototter (2020-05-31 09:41:35+00:00): Maar eerst nog even tav PRJvSpark/ Bijlmerweide.
Die leisure moet ook in zijn geheel los te maken zijn van de residential, lijkt me.
Dan ga ik de al gedane vlakken bij GH en GL straktrekken en de nieuwe meteen stotend invoeren. 
Begrenzingen: 
Bij de grens van Bijlmerweide aan de Weespertrekvaart vallen de oude boerderijen nu buiten de leisure. 
Die moeten dus apart worden ingekleurd .Vreemder is, dat de begrenzing niet is aangepast aan een veranderde situatie, loopt in het noordwesten zo te zien op de gemeentegrens, dus met inbegrip van bus- en rijstrook richting N, in het ZO op de grens van de oude, nog niet verbrede A9 Gaasperdammerweg.  
- water: De exacte locatie van de meest zuidelijke  inlaat heb ik nog niet gevonden; de middeninlaat weet ik, maar is nog niet ingetekend.
Bij beide ontbreken deels of helemaal de sloten en dammetjes die erbij horen, dat is het eerste wat ik voor de Bijlmerweide ga aanpassen.
Moet het gemaal als zodanig worden benoemd? De tags ervoor heb ik in de wiki gevonden. Zo ja, omtrek gebouw of omtrek kavel? De sleutel man_made blijkt een vette zwarte lijn te geven.
eggie (2020-05-31 13:13:33+00:00): gemaal 
man_made=pumping_station
building=yes
Niet te veel naar de rendering kijken.