piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JochenOSM (2019-10-28 15:25:04+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,
inwiefern ist brand= besser als manufacturer= ?
surveyor54 (2019-10-29 12:51:16+00:00): Hi JochenOSM,
für mich ist "brand" eine eingetragenes Markenzeichen, was für "bike-energy" zutrifft.

https://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/registerHABM?AKZ=011132511&CURSOR=0

Gruß
surveyor54
JochenOSM (2019-10-29 18:29:40+00:00): Ja, "bike energy" ist eine eingetragene Marke, genau wie "emb" ( https://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/3020130565045/DE ). 

Aber das Tag brand= wird laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:brand entweder genutzt, um die angebotene Marke von Produkten oder Dienstleistungen zu beschreiben, oder er zeigt die Zugehörigkeit eines inhabergeführten Geschäftes an. Beides ist hier nicht der Fall, bike energy verkauft hier nichts, und der Strom als Produkt ist überall gleich. Sie sind nur der Hersteller. 

Übertragen: Nur weil Siemens eine Marke ist und Windkraftanlagen baut auf denen irgendwo ihr Logo ist würde ich nicht brand=Siemens dran schreiben.

Meines Erachtens ist brand daher nicht zutreffend und abgesehen davon die Entfernung von manufacturer nicht gerechtfertigt.

Gruß,
Jochen
surveyor54 (2019-10-30 08:50:30+00:00): Jopp,
da muss ich dir recht geben, manufacturer=*
passt hier besser.
Ich werde es korrigieren.

Gruß
-svr54
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-10-28 13:12:07+00:00): Why is this edit box so large when all you edited was 2 nodes?
also why is there 3 like this
hasaan22 (2019-10-30 11:38:10+00:00): I mistakenly uploaded 3 nodes in Iran. The edit box is large because of object ID.
Sorry
AndersAndersson (2019-10-30 21:16:19+00:00): Can you please describe your way of working? There is a lot of 13 year old nodes suddenly woken to life in Iran.
pangoSE (2019-11-01 19:48:59+00:00): Nice work! :)
rekasruj (2019-10-30 12:42:05+00:00): Hi,
I have added this road using "Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery ".
Regards,
Rekasruj
eggie (2019-10-28 10:39:45+00:00): Kijk even hier. Het gebouw staat nog in de BAG (Kadaster)  https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=blankenhoefseweg%2017&resultOffset=0&objectId=0203100000427954&geometry.x=163623.45299573&geometry.y=465567.69999851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0203100000427954
Dus even op het potloodje klikken en een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster dat het gebouw gesloopt is anders komt het met de volgende update weer in OSM terug.
Doe je dat zelf? Als organisatie geef je gewoon OSM op. 
Een woonerf kun je intekeken met highway=living_street
Eggie
Timpie100 (2019-10-28 11:32:07+00:00): Ik heb even iets beter gekeken en er is iets anders voor in de plek gekomen een nieuwe schuur. Alleen die kleine schuurtjes er naast stonden er nog niet op. moet ik dan gewoon waar nu die nieuwe schuur staat opnieuw een gebouw aan maken?
eggie (2019-10-28 11:58:21+00:00): Wanneer het in de BAG viewer staat kun je een import aanvragen via het forum van OSM. (draadje verzoek BAG import)  Dan komen de Kadastergegevens mee. Als de schuurtjes niet in de BAG staan en zonder bouwvergunning zijn neergezet kun je ze zelf intekenen. Niet vastplakken aan het gras. 
Je zet dan als bron source=PDOK actueel of local_knowledge.
Up to you!
dktue (2019-10-31 16:45:29+00:00): :-)
dekatherm (2019-11-05 22:09:56+00:00): Are you a paid mapper? If so, please disclose all of your affiliations.
freebeer (2019-11-09 21:49:24+00:00): i am not [name revealed elsewhere], but i believe he is passionate about stadiums/stadia and their sports, and while he is related to a website that may or may not use osm data, his work on osm is not sponsored as such.

he may receive payment outside osm.  at this point i should probably let stadiaarcadia speak for himself, rather than trying to defend him.

i see a problem in this changeset, subject of earlier comments that have fallen off my week-only radar history due to actually having a real life by day leaving less time to swat spammers.  and that is the use of ALL-CAPS for Weserstadion, in addition to the locals' reservation of using a sponsor name in the regular name field rather than in the official name.  osm does not blindly mimic the advert-wishes of corporations, but tries to treat them all alike.  if wohninvest wishes to be written so rather than Wohninvest, then fine, just like i find dm (Drogerie Markt) totally in line when DM means to me Deutsche Mark, a currency.

however, to write WESERSTADION in all caps goes against the osm policy that names should be written out without advert enhancements, and only acronyms like MAN (vehicles) or TITSUP (total incompetence to sling uppercase prattle) should get the uppercase treatment, lest the map be spammed by firms TRYING TO OUTSHOUT EACH OTHER.

there is an ici paris xxl or something i've wanted to apply this to, as i understand, without knowing french, ici to be a word, same with paris.  at best the XXL can remain all caps like with austrian XXXXXXXL Lutz or whatever they are now.  if you cannot provide the words forming the acronym WESERSTADION, then don't write it that way.  I'll try to come up with a backronym i feel is suitably disrespectful, and probably should not make it into osm:
Wan*ers E*ting S*it
oh this is too stupid and off-topic.  Weserstadion is one word, not an acronym, and should be written so, not screamed.

sorry for going off-topic here.  anyway, i believe stadiaarcadia is independent but with personal interests, like most of us volunteers.

would love to be proven wrong.  again.

grazie.
stadiaarcadia (2019-11-12 06:36:22+00:00): Ofcourse I’m not paid. I just like to improve OSM with adding and improving buildings / stadiums. I just wanted to add the new current stadium name the way it is, because Weserstadion is the former name of the stadium. I can understand if you don’t like a commercial name, but that commercial name is the real name now. In Amsterdam, the home of Ajax is named Johan Cruijff ArenA for example. Should that also be named Johan Cruijff Arena then? Because of the caps lock. Or Emirates Stadium, should that be named Arsenal Stadium because Emirates refers to a company? I also don’t like capslock and commercial names, but I thought it those are the real names chosen by the owners, we should have to respect that. But if capslock names are against any OSM policies, I’ll respect that too ofcourse.
stadiaarcadia (2019-11-12 06:40:26+00:00): Do I guess “wohninvest Weserstadion” would be the most accurate name then on OSM?
eggie (2019-10-28 10:09:19+00:00): Ahh .. de leeuw is van de kaart.. :)
Edits van startende mappers worden gevolgd.. uiteraard ook om te helpen.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-28 10:18:02+00:00): Oke. Voorzichtig met de kaart. de schade door schuiven met de kaart in Lemmer heb ik hersteld. 
Iets uitproberen kan wel zolang je maar niet opslaat.
Editor is berucht in het veroorzaken door schade omdat je met de linkermuis schuift, maar ook zaken selecteert. Heb je net een node te pakken bij schuiven dan gaat alles wat daaraan vast zit km's mee dwars door Fryslan.
wegspotter (2019-11-01 21:38:13+00:00): Paden in bossen wijzigen erg snel. Deze paden heb ik eind augustus nog bewandeld.
Pieter Deforche (2019-11-06 09:49:02+00:00): Dat is vreemd want sommige van die paden zijn zeker al maanden helemaal overgroeid en onmogelijk te bewandelen. Bij de andere die ik heb bewerkt staat nu een heel duidelijk verbodsbord. Deze mogen dus niet meer gebruikt worden.
wegspotter (2019-11-07 21:00:01+00:00): Zie ook mijn GPX-tracks - in september heeft het veel geregend en was het erg warm... 

Is ook dit stukje ontoegankelijk? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283346583
Pieter Deforche (2019-11-08 15:50:47+00:00): Ja, aan de oostzijde van dit stukje staat een verbodsbordje. Komende van het Bruinbospad moet je daar verplicht linksaf richting  het Heilig-Geestgoedpad.
eggie (2019-10-28 10:32:58+00:00): Perfect!
E de Wit (2019-10-28 10:42:36+00:00): In OpenStreetMap is er zelfs een tag beschikbaar voor deze soort 'bibliotheken'. :)
amenity=public_bookcase

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase

-E de Wit
rekasruj (2019-10-30 12:39:49+00:00): Hi,
I have added this road using "Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery ".
Regards,
Rekasruj
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-10-28 13:11:53+00:00): Why is this edit box so large when all you edited was 1 node
Saeed SJ (2019-11-02 05:28:30+00:00): Actually I just uploaded one node in Iran and I don't know why the edit box was shown as worldwide.
Anyway, I deleted the node.
freebeer (2019-11-08 11:16:51+00:00): why in the first place are you uploading deleted nodes with low ID numbers?  old nodes should never be re-used because it makes reverting to their original undeleted state impossible.

secondly, you are uploading these recycled nodes with rubbish tags,
      gamification    yes
       player_id      451002118
          slug        report_network
among others.

the tag
   creation_date_time 2019-10-25T22:38:03.140
does not reflect the upload time, so this is obviously being uploaded from some external database with no relation to osm.

this repeated abuse of meaningless data has no place in osm, and i suggest you figure out how this is happening, whether it is a malicious plugin for josm, or something you are doing, and fix it.  this sort of activity has been going on too long and too often for it to be a simple mistake.

earlier edits of this type used a bogus josm version number that i can't immediately point to, so this may not be an josm edit but some malware that pretends to be josm, as that version number only appeared for non-serious mapping.
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-10-28 13:11:44+00:00): Why is this edit box so large when all you edited was 2 nodes?
ToniE (2019-10-28 13:47:09+00:00): This is in a set of edits where the user reuses IDs of nodes which have been deleted 13 years ago in Alaska and shifts them to Iran, for whatever reason.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-28 20:43:07+00:00): It has happened to a lot of nodes lately. Always in Iran, as I have seen. Seems like they have a software with some kind of bug in it.
Saeed SJ (2019-11-02 05:46:06+00:00): Actually I just uploaded two nodes in Iran and I don't know why the edit box was shown as worldwide.
Anyway, I deleted the nodes.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-28 20:40:06+00:00): You removed the name of the bridge. The name is not useless.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-28 20:53:32+00:00): Thanks for spotting my mistake! Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76315492#map=19/60.67529/17.15386
AndersAndersson (2019-10-28 20:59:57+00:00): Thanks for a quick response!
PT-53 (2019-10-28 10:53:38+00:00): Hallo VR-Bank,
neben dem Namen der Bank sollte auch noch die Eigenschaft, daß dort eine Bank untergebracht ist, angegeben werden:
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbank
Gibt es dort auch einen Geldautomaten?
Diesen könntest Du mit einem separaten Knoten an dessen Standort eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Datm
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-28 19:07:20+00:00): Hallo VR-Bank, 
ein Geldinstitut wird nicht mit branch=Bank gekennzeichnet, sondern mit amenity=bank.
Bitte Wiki lesen und Eintrag überarbeiten.
Die teilweise falschen Adrerssangaben und falschen Öffnungszeiten wurden bereits von einem anderen Mapper korrigiert.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-04 07:16:46+00:00): Hallo VR-Bank, 
berichtigst Du den falschen Eintrag noch?
Fragende Grüße
VR-Bank (2019-11-04 08:06:35+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe nun den Eintrag "Bank" von branch auf amenity geändert. Passt dies nun so?

Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-04 09:24:27+00:00): Hallo VR-Bank, 
wenn Du jetzt noch den Schlüsselwert für amenity von Bank auf bank änderst, dann paßt es.
Für Schlüsselwerte werden Britisch-Englische Begriffe genommen und die immer kleingeschrieben.
Grüße
naomap (2019-11-07 14:25:01+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution très utile. J'ai une petite question : le double-sens cyclable est-il matérialisé par une bande réservée aux cyclistes ou pas ? Sinon est-ce que la rue est limitée à 30 km/h ?

Merci d'avance !
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
pangoSE (2019-11-03 11:07:32+00:00): Hi
Thanks for this edit. :)
stadiaarcadia (2019-11-12 06:41:15+00:00): You’re welcome :)
canfe (2019-10-30 08:48:01+00:00): Bene ma rendi il parco giochi rettangolare
Marius Geitle (2019-10-28 21:24:49+00:00): Hei,

Flott jobbet, men jeg har lagt inn igjen bryggepromonaden på sørsiden av Tista. Den er faktisk der, flyfoto er bare ikke oppdaterte enda.

Du kan lese om den her:
https://www.ha-halden.no/nyheter/halden-kommune/joakim-karlsen/na-har-den-nye-promenaden-fatt-et-navn/s/5-20-706976
user_5359 (2019-10-28 16:59:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Alhamdulillah (2019-10-28 11:07:52+00:00): Do you know the rule
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only ?
"circular mud huts" is a description, not a name.
Warin61 (2019-10-29 07:36:02+00:00): Hi, 
Welcome to OSM.

This changset has several errors. You may find the OSM wiki helpfull in resolving these..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page Use the search box to find things. 

One of these errors is relation 10224797 build=roof;yes. OSM does not do buildings as several values, buildings can only be one value. The relation looks to have 2 buildings - I assuem one is th eroof the other is jst a building.. What I would do is delete the relation and tag each separate way as building=*. Thew roof should get a layer=1 too..
natg3844 (2019-10-29 09:34:07+00:00): OK, I have tried to fix the relation 10224797 details - as it's an old service station that has a roof on it, and is now a cafe. Hopefully that is now fixed properly. Thanks for the help
Warin61 (2019-10-29 23:04:36+00:00): That works for me. 
Don't worry about making errors .. we all do them. Keep mapping.
GinaroZ (2019-10-29 18:51:12+00:00): Did you mean to remove the amenity=place of worship from this cathedral? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48509921/history
crossmyloof (2019-10-29 19:25:50+00:00): It seems to have done that when I upgraded the tag. I have put it back on and Will see what happens.
user_5359 (2019-10-28 17:00:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
abakus_uploader (2019-10-28 23:32:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Famlam (2021-07-12 16:37:00+00:00): Het is al even geleden, maar wellicht herinnert u zich weg 739533679 nog. Deze sluit momenteel niet aan op de weg (en is mij ook niet opgevallen tijdens mijn fietstocht vandaag). Bestaat dit pad nog, en zo ja, waar sluit deze aan bij de Ooysedijk?

(Ook, als het niet verhard is, en er geen borden staan m.b.t. toegang, is wellicht highway=path + surface=unpaved (of iets specifiekers) beter )
Br Kessels (2021-07-14 16:03:40+00:00): > Bestaat dit pad nog, en zo ja, waar sluit deze aan bij de Ooysedijk?

Ja. Dit bestaat nog. Het is niet verhard en in de zomer vaak wat overgroeid. Maar nog begaanbaar.
szydzio (2019-11-05 17:48:36+00:00): Powiązane punkty adresowe posprzątałem => https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76660931
marczoutendijk (2019-10-28 12:41:43+00:00): You don't have to put the name "pond" on the map because the name is used to give a name to something and not to describe what something is! Because that is allready given in the tags your have chosen.
E.g. if something is tagged as "building=yes", you should not also use "name=building"!

So, can you remove that "name=pond" yourself now?
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ma-rt-in (2019-10-28 19:36:57+00:00): Hallo,
zu deiner Information: Diese Kirche gibt es nicht mehr als Kirche. Daher werde ich deinen Eintrag entfernen.
vg
mueschel (2019-10-29 08:36:08+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "tdc=T-brønd"? This is not used in any other place.

Thanks!
VicVal (2019-10-29 15:59:53+00:00): This is a temporary tag used during a mapping excercise. All tdc=* tags will be replaced shortly.
user_5359 (2019-10-28 19:00:41+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). Please have a look on your relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8277968
rekulc1 (2019-10-29 07:18:55+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into my edit. I have mistakenly left it while modifying geometry of intersection. Apologies for the error, rectified it already. 

Thanks again,
 rekulc1.
sleemp (2021-06-02 19:55:00+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы случайно не ошиблись с точкой https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6924565340. Там чистое поле. максимум там есть магазин электротоваров ЭТМ, не очень похоже, что там Ив Роше есть.
trial (2019-10-29 12:53:20+00:00): merci de ne pas confondre hangar agricole et hangar aéronautique (oui iD est trompeur)
gabro00 (2019-10-28 12:58:38+00:00): *18->20
abakus_uploader (2019-10-28 23:32:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2019-10-28 13:29:05+00:00): Het deel van het gebouw dat vastgeplakt zat aan de landuse heb ik losgemaakt.
Je hebt nu een nieuw gebouw ingetekend. Is dat niet het gebouw uit de BAG en heb je het per abuis verwijderd?
Eggie
Timpie100 (2019-10-28 13:35:02+00:00): Het klopt zoals u net zij dat ik het per abuis heb verwijderd, want dit gebouw moest blijven staan alleen de schuurtjes er naast zijn er later bij geplaatst. en dat was nog niet in OSM geregistreerd.
eggie (2019-10-28 13:56:03+00:00): Ik heb even de oude situatie teruggezet met de juiste Kadastergegevens. Drie keer revert gedaan.
eggie (2019-10-28 13:58:39+00:00): .. maar duidelijk is de luchtfoto niet... Je zult dus moeten gaan kijken. 
Het zou zomaar weg kunnen zijn Bouw 1959..
Wanneer het gebouw echt weg is dan even een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster. Dan verwerken ze het in hun administratie. Zie BAG viewer.
eggie (2019-10-28 13:59:55+00:00): Deze satellietfoto's geven de laatste situatie aan uit  aug 2019
https://satellietdataportaal.nl/
Timpie100 (2019-10-28 14:00:01+00:00): Zal het zoizo wel even vragen ken die mensen die daar naast wonen.
viloan (2019-10-28 13:11:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-10-29 08:37:09+00:00): Hi,
you added some turn lanes here, but with a spelling mistake. 
The key is "turn:lanes", not "turnlanes". 
Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks!
DeBigC (2022-07-03 12:56:40+00:00): Thank you very muchly for your interpolation
nevw (2019-10-30 05:58:02+00:00): Hi
in this changeset you appear to have accidentally shifted the pharmacy on East Terrace to a node on a grassed area on Tobruk Terrace near the roundabout.
See here https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76299645
Are you able to fix or do you want me to correct it?
eggie (2019-10-28 13:32:02+00:00): building=shed ?
Timpie100 (2019-10-28 13:40:17+00:00): Ja is nu veranderd naar een hut. Zat zelf meer te twijfelen of dat wel de juiste benaming er voor was waardoor ik het eerst niet doorzette.
user_5359 (2019-10-28 17:31:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Dimacn (2019-10-30 06:46:13+00:00): Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM:
1. Трава с деревьями - это ещё не парк отдыха. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  2. В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  3. Детские площадки обозначаются тегами leisure=playground Пожалуйста исправьте.
LucFreitas (2019-10-28 18:08:48+00:00): Boa tarde. Você pode aprender mais sobre rotas de ônibus nesta página: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/ES/Ônibus
Skippern (2019-12-08 01:32:03+00:00): Varias linhas ônibus no região ja e mapeado em detalhas, você pode estudar esses linjas para ter exemplo como usar também.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76300656
viloan (2019-10-28 13:47:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Vinber (2019-10-29 18:31:21+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce en cours de construction ? Ou un projet ?
Chouette les mises à jour des commerces sur Mérignac, c'est énorme !