piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5239402 (2021-07-24 11:13:07+00:00): Hello. Why do you extend Route 3 and make a road that doesn't exist? It's not a place to make things that don't exist, it's a place to make things that exist. Route 3 is the last stop of Cheorwon and North Korea is the nominal last stop.
user_5239402 (2021-07-24 11:13:41+00:00): 그리고 다른 도로도 북한으로 연장하신 까닭은 무엇인가요?
user_5239402 (2021-07-24 11:13:44+00:00): And why did you extend other roads to North Korea?
ke9tv (2021-07-27 00:14:51+00:00): I don't know what you were trying to accomplish with this changeset, but one of the things that you did was to delete the High Peaks Wilderness.

Did you intend to do that, and if so, could I trouble you to explain why?

Otherwise, could you please revert that part of the change?  I don't want to have to redraw that monster.

Shoot me a direct message if you  need help. I can probably figure out how to do the partial revert of just that part.
ottwiz (2021-07-27 00:20:34+00:00): I also noticed this, because i've just drawn some forest  landcover and this disturbed me. What was the reason behind it?
ke9tv (2021-07-27 18:39:38+00:00): After discussion with @ppjj, did a partial revert to restore High Peaks Wilderness. It appears to have gone without a hiccup.
SekeRob (2021-07-25 14:20:34+00:00): hi

you converted a square to a line by deleting the place=square tag, which I do not understand as being a duplicate node per your comment. I've restored the situation, where the 2 parts both side of the street are the combined square. Don't hesitate to ask why it's done the way it was done.

cheers
felipeeugenio (2021-07-22 22:28:19+00:00): Estimado Vicente. Ojo con sus ediciones. Borró una bomba de bencina shell y la reemplazó por un edificio + una tienda.
Ya lo reparé. saludos
VicenteBarraFM (2021-07-23 05:51:06+00:00): Gracias por la corrección. Se me debe haber hecho un cambio de información en la mente jaja. Como tenía 2 pestañas de OpenStreetMap, probablemente no me fijé lo suficiente antes de guardar cambios, tendré más cuidado a la próxima para mejorar a la hora de mapear.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-23 12:02:44+00:00): No hay problema. Estamos para ayudarnos.

Está invitado al chat de la comunidad en Telegram si así lo desea.
El link está en mi perfil.
Saludos
M!dgard (2021-08-10 21:35:46+00:00): Bedankt voor uw bijdragen. De verduidelijkende tag voor een oversteekplaats met verkeerslichten is crossing=traffic_signals, niet crossing=pedestrian_signals.
Enock4seth (2021-07-22 22:49:58+00:00): Hi Denison, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I am curious if the "Drone images" used for reference could be made public via https://openaerialmap.org/. Furthermore, instead of deleting existing objects and trying to redraw them completely, kindly use utils2plugin's "Replace Geometry" function; see https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/
OSMPossum (2021-07-22 17:43:55+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-07-15; OSM Data
DaveF (2021-07-23 14:34:23+00:00): hi
To check, has this building been demolished?
http://osmz.ru/imagery/#20/51.15690/-0.16098/bing
dcapillae (2021-07-22 18:53:24+00:00): Los restos corresponden con las civilizaciones fenicia, romana y medieval islámica.
Anton Khorev (2021-08-02 16:40:11+00:00): You're claiming that this is a part of National Road 7. Which *nation* does this national road belong to? Is there a road designation scheme for both North and South Korea? Wasn't ref=AH6 already a correct tag?
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-03 15:08:45+00:00): Should be reviewed by a local contributor. Thanks.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:34:07+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
felipeeugenio (2021-07-22 18:34:59+00:00): Hola. Con ID puedes copiar y pegar una estructura. girarla y hacerle efecto espejo. Por si tienes que hacer varias casas que son iguales, para que no te salgan distintas.
también puedes cuadrarlas con la letra Q
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108444826
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-03 15:08:25+00:00): Should be reviewed by a local contributor. Thanks.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:33:59+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
BCNorwich (2021-07-23 06:21:44+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Shisha bar is not a cuisine, so I've tagged it as a description.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-07-23 06:23:43+00:00): Forgot to say I looked at the website and could not determine any particular cuisine.
rachelcribbin (2021-07-23 13:16:05+00:00): Thank you so much for checking and fixing that Bernard!!
Patchanka (2021-07-23 16:04:34+00:00): bonjour
pour les mises à jour dans le périmètre du centre-ville de Bayonne, je me permet de vous conseiller d'utiliser la photo aérienne "Bayonne - Petit et Grand Bayonne 2019". Non seulement elle est d'une meilleure résolution que celle de l'IGN, mais elle est également plus récente (IGN=2018).
Vous la trouverez dans la liste des fonds de carte dans ID.
Le jardin public a subi des transformations depuis 2018. Certaines sont visibles sur la photo de 2019. Pour les autres il faudra encore attendre une nouvelle photo aérienne...
Bonne journée
BotaFlo64 (2021-07-28 21:29:21+00:00): Merci pour votre suggestion. je ne connaissais pas cette possibilité, je vais regarder ça. 
bonne journée
Mathias_ADAV (2023-06-20 14:51:06+00:00): Bonjour, la rue de Paris est bien une aire pietonne (highway = pedestrian) et non une voie verte.
skquinn (2021-07-23 01:28:20+00:00): Should start "Update building outline"... CTWS strikes again
felipeeugenio (2021-07-22 18:33:45+00:00): Hola
son realmente rejas esas? o hay panderetas? (barrier=wall)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108445183
Marmanvii (2021-07-22 18:38:21+00:00): Efectivamente, lo corrijo
tordans (2021-07-22 18:26:13+00:00): Außerdem Sperrflächen eingetragen und bestehende Poller anhand Luftbildern besser ausgerichtet.
fudsnottica (2021-07-26 14:59:26+00:00): Responding to your review request. First off, great to see more of the local buildings be mapped! Helps us get addresses in, which is great!

First, many of your buildings aren't squared off, but buildings usually are. Use the Square command when right-clicking on a closed way or press Q with it selected. Really nice way to make the buildings look better!

Secondly, if you aren't certain something is a house, better to tag it as a generic Building (`building=yes`). People can use Street Complete on iOS or Android to fill in the building type and other details later. For example here, I suspect at least one of the small inner building is a Garage rather than a house.
taxi301 (2021-12-05 22:18:11+00:00): but what's the matter ? tagged according to the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
Friendly_Ghost (2021-12-06 09:18:35+00:00): The matter is that many buildings are tagged with tags that are duplicates of what this Wiki page recommends and which are already marked as deprecated on the Wiki, such as building:height=* instead of height=*, building:roof:colour=* instead of roof:colour=*, building:roof:shape=* instead of roof:shape=* etc. In this changeset I changed some duplicate keys to the more common and better documented variants.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-22 19:10:42+00:00): Un dato, las imagenes de Maxar son mucho más actualizadas. sin embargo están muy desalineadas. Si vas a alinear usa las que estas usando, que son Esri. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108445739
Marmanvii (2021-07-22 19:45:40+00:00): Gracias por la info!
eggie (2021-07-22 19:26:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  :  Priam actie.. Wanneer het ook voor brommers/snorfietsen geldt
dan toevoegen
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

Verder kun je niet doorgaande binnenstraten omtaggen naar highway=residential.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:33:35+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
wambag (2021-07-22 19:23:06+00:00): The primary function of this connector road is to link Rt 138 with I-195, therefore highway=motorway_link. In addition, the slip roads from this connector are part of this link, even though one way solely connects 138 with Milliken Blvd.
BS97n (2021-07-22 19:17:15+00:00): Kommentar vergessen: Details im Bochumer Süden. Hauptsächlich Fuß-, Wirtschafts- und Erschließungswege und Bürgersteige.
gscscnd (2021-07-23 07:24:09+00:00): Wszystkie tagi znajdują się już na <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797853362>, obiekt <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8942376482> jest zbędny.
Dimitar155 (2021-07-27 14:37:06+00:00): Здравей и добре дошъл в OSM. Обикновенно пътища, които са в ремонт се обозначават с допълнителен таг "constuction=(вид на пътя)". Правилно си променил highway тага, но трябва да премахнеш construction тага, защото различните навигации ще го отчитат като участък в ремонт. 
Поздрави, Митко
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108447858
ToniE (2021-07-22 20:01:44+00:00): Servus geo-d,

nicht wunder ob der Komplexität des Mappings dort ... habe mal 3D ausprobiert

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.0638633&lon=11.6631956&zoom=20&camera.theta=48.201&camera.phi=39.82

https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=48.06396&lon=11.66303&zoom=19.0&tilt=40&rotation=63

Schönen Abend noch
Toni
geo-d (2021-07-22 20:17:40+00:00): ... Schöne Demos, so sieht dann wohl die Zukunft von OSM aus!
Viele Grüße,
geo-d
ToniE (2021-07-22 20:27:52+00:00): Ich glaube, interessant für Indoor-Navigation könnte das .... sein 

https://openlevelup.net/?l=-1#19/48.13941/11.56591

https://indoorequal.org/#map=17.54/48.139406/11.565833&level=-1

https://openlevelup.net/?l=5#19/48.13466/11.61123

https://indoorequal.org/#map=18.93/48.1346571/11.6109646&level=5
geo-d (2021-07-22 21:13:55+00:00): Sehr interessant, bedeutet aber dann wohl auch umfangreiches metergenaues Mapping ...
gscholz (2021-07-23 09:45:28+00:00): Hi whatmeinfallible,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Nindirí (Municipio)" and "Masaya (Municipio)":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.07463&lat=12.03875&zoom=12

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108448274

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
whatmeinfallible (2021-07-23 16:20:57+00:00): Greetings,
Thanks for catching this. I have repaired both relations.
eggie (2021-07-22 20:27:04+00:00): Dag Pyronick..
Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
edvac (2021-08-07 16:15:17+00:00): Bonjour, carlitos gomez:

Est-ce que vous pouvez écrire des commentaires sur les groupes de changements qui décrivent mieux ce que vous faites dans chaque édition. Il y a des cents d'éditions que vous décrivez avec "digitalisation", qui ne dit rien du tout.

SVP, lisez cette page wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:33:26+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
osmviborg (2021-07-23 08:07:05+00:00): Hej. I et tættere bebygget område, som her, er 'cycleway=track' at foretrække. Se mere her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
Sovsigryden (2021-07-23 17:53:35+00:00): Tak.
Sovsigryden (2021-07-23 17:59:41+00:00): What do you think about 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108507272#map=17/56.23364/10.22454
osmviborg (2021-07-24 05:44:42+00:00): By the book
Enock4seth (2021-07-22 22:55:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Here are some resources to help you
- https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
- https://learnosm.org/ 

Furthermore, only trace footprints of buildings instead of entire compound as a building. I hope this helps
DressyPear4 (2021-07-22 20:32:03+00:00): Olá, novamente, evite adicionar nomes todo com letras em maiúsculo!
smaprs (2021-07-24 01:10:10+00:00): Olá Kauana, agradecemos por suas contribuições.  
Observação importante: os nomes devem ser escritos com acentos, minúsculas e Maísculas, como: "Fazenda Gaúcha".  
Ok?  
Qualquer dúvida, contate a comunidade brasileira de mapeadores:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato
mueschel (2021-07-28 10:24:02+00:00): Hi,
could you explain "cairn_type = UNESCO"? Is that some kind of recognized heritage?
andershl (2021-07-28 14:51:44+00:00): It is a little tricky and there is probably a better way to fully identify them. These are not just cairs/heaps of stones, but there are markers showing them s borders to Unesco World Heritage site 1149. Moreover osme of them are at peaks, so markup is a mixture of three things. 

The best might actulally be to separate the marking of those points:
... Those which are peaks as such with names and elevation.
... On all of the points simply cairn
... and on all of them boundary=marker with Unesco World Heritage as name.

I may have supplementary details and possibly some changes for he last point when I revisit the site in october.
But please feel free to correct..
mueschel (2021-07-29 06:57:31+00:00): This sounds good. Maybe format=cairn could be added as well?

In case of the peaks I'd opt for two independent nodes - disentangling the tags will get increasingly difficult if too many things are mixed.
andershl (2021-07-29 07:03:52+00:00): Super!
Wilmer Osario (2021-07-27 11:17:19+00:00): Ya el Teresa Carreño estaba colocado en el mapa
martianfreeloader (2023-06-04 19:34:14+00:00): Hi,
Could you help with this note?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3720678
Владимир К (2022-07-26 17:11:45+00:00): Добрый день!
рисование подобных несуществующих полос является ошибкой. удаляю.
gscholz (2021-07-28 04:49:10+00:00): HI Qualhano,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Baixo Guandu", "Itaguaçu" and "Ibituba":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-40.95083&lat=-19.71843&zoom=13

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108450063

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
eggie (2021-07-23 05:07:01+00:00): 
Lastig stukje.. soms is het schipperen.
Die voetpadbrug geeft een foutmelding en zal layer=1 nodig hebben. De man_made=bridge zal dan layer 2 moeten worden. (Net als het wegdeel)

Gr eggie
TheB55 (2021-07-23 07:45:48+00:00): Wat bedoel je met voetpadbrug? De paden die over de kades lopen dwars op de brug? Die lopen er namelijk onderdoor.. Een van die paden heeft bridge=yes wat dan ook niet klopt?

Ik kan ook de foutmelding niet vinden. In JOSM bij "validate" krijg ik geen fouten..? Ik hoor graag hoe het moet, bedankt!
eggie (2021-07-23 08:51:54+00:00): Even gespiekt in straatkijk.

Die onderdoorgang aan de noordzijde onder de brug staat getagd als bridge=yes
Die zou dus een layer=1 moeten krijgen...maarrrrrr   het is het is inderdaad geen brug..
Maak er van bridge=boardwalk zonder layer...
De man_made=bridge heeft al layer=1  Dat is dan goed. 
Het wegdeel op de brug gewoon layer=1 maken  (nu 2)

Dan is alles goed. 
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2021-07-23 09:10:01+00:00): De foutmelding die ik krijg is kruisende highway weg  
dat is de het water met de 'loopbrug' 
Vreemd dat je hier geen foutmeldingen krijgt. Probeer de validatie nog maar een keer te draaien.
Alleen al in dit stukje krijg ik 953 foutmeldingen waarvan je de meeste gewoon kunt negeren. 
Het is overigens geen drama. :)
fghj753 (2021-07-22 20:41:28+00:00): Sorry for global changeset. I tried to introduce bounding box to overpass query but global query was only way to run it without getting  any errors. 
Changed elements where value of colour=* was clearly hexadeciamal number (matched regex `^[0-9a-fA-F]{6}$`), but didn't have prefixed `#`. 
Query was [out:xml][timeout:60]; ( nwr["colour"~"^[0-9a-fA-F]{6}$"];); out meta;
ToniE (2021-07-22 20:48:48+00:00): Thanks for sharing the information.

What the query will not/never find:

type=route_master

relations, as they do not include ways or nodes as members (by design) but (if correctly mapped) only type=route relations.
ToniE (2021-07-22 20:49:55+00:00): ... true only if you specify a search area though - what you didn't.
ToniE (2021-07-22 20:55:25+00:00): ... but your query did not find 'relations' at all?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2894792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9923466
...

seen at

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/AU/SA/AU-SA-Adelaide-Metro-Analysis.html#train_GAWC

and elsewhere
fghj753 (2021-07-22 21:05:20+00:00): Thanks for route_master relations tip. 
I think relations not being edited in this set was probably due to limitation of Level0 editor, which only loads first 500 elements. Relations are usually listed at the end of overpass results set and therefore editor dropped them due to meeting limit on maximum number of elements.
ToniE (2021-07-23 07:24:05+00:00): I see, so some more iterations to complete the task.

For the route_master issue: you cannot find something in a given area which does not have physical (nodes with lat/lon or ways with their nodes) members.
This works only w/o a search area being defined (i.e. world wide).
Same applies to empty relations though.
PT-53 (2021-07-23 08:17:15+00:00): Hallo kdkeller,
Du hast beim Freilichtmuseum das Merkmal
tourism=museum
erweitert auf
tourism=museum;attraction

Warum? Ist ein Museum nicht auch schon eine Attraktion?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-07-23 08:20:46+00:00): DE:Tag:tourism=museum
Ein Museum ist eine Institution, die Ausstellungen zu wissenschaftlichen, historischen, kulturellen Themen hat, meistens öffentlich als touristische Attraktion.
kdkeller (2021-07-23 17:25:58+00:00): Hallo PT-53, vielen Dank für deine Nachricht,
mir ist bei den meisten OSM-Kartenebenen aufgefallen, dass beim Reinzoomen immer fast nur die Beschriftung "Dampfbahn Kürnbach" erscheint, das Museumsdorf nicht. Damit man das Museum nicht übersieht, hab ich das attraction hinzugefügt. Wenn du meinst, es ist unpassend, lösch es einfach wieder raus.
Viele Grüße!
kdkeller
PT-53 (2021-07-23 17:29:50+00:00): Hallo kdkeller, 
so etwas nennt man Tagging für den Renderer und ist in OSM unerwünscht / sehr verpönt!
Ich würde es sehr begrüßen, wenn Du diese Ergänzung wieder selbst löscht.
Grüße
trial (2021-07-24 21:21:35+00:00): Bonjour, il est plus classique d'utiliser simplement phone et website. Le format des numéros de téléphone doit être international : +33 2 et non 02.
Vois aussi https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Roublard
Roublard (2021-07-24 23:40:03+00:00): Merci pour l'info et pour le site osmose, j'en ai profité pour commencer des corrections.
trial (2021-07-25 11:09:15+00:00): Pour le point géodésique, c'est plus "sioux", voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Rep%C3%A8res_G%C3%A9od%C3%A9siques et la fiche c'est https://geodesie.ign.fr/fiches/pdf/O.L.K3-476_498511.pdf
Roublard (2021-07-25 14:00:50+00:00): Merci pour ton aide
trial (2021-07-25 14:54:49+00:00): De rien, au plaisir. Je vais demander à la liste [OSM-talk-fr] pourquoi les points géodésiques n'ont pas tous été intégrés car il y en a beaucoup mais pas tous.
Roublard (2021-07-25 16:00:04+00:00): Les 3 que j'ai ajoutés sont des points NGF, c'est peut-être ceux là qui n'ont pas été intégrés.
trial (2021-07-25 17:50:20+00:00): C'est aussi ce que j'ai remarqué.
Pour l'élévation, inutile de préciser l'unité car par défaut ce sont des mètres. Le séparateur décimal est le séparateur britannique donc le point. Soit ele=20.722
Les coordonnées sont d'après la fiche 
lat=47,7671111111111 lon=-3,54625 (sauf erreur de ma part). D'où viennent les autres valeurs ?
Roublard (2021-07-26 20:48:57+00:00): Quelles valeurs ? Il n'y a que l'identifiant, l'altitude et les identifiants des 2 autres points composant le triplet.
trial (2021-07-26 21:05:02+00:00): La longitude et la latitude ! C'est quand même à peu près le plus important pour les points géodésiques ;-).
ralley (2021-07-22 23:15:03+00:00): The new builds appear to be visible in the Bing, ESRI and Maxar imagery which is available i the Id editor.  Just beware that the imagery mat itself be offset, not sure how to correct for that in Id, easy in JOSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108450719
corwinbikes (2021-07-22 23:21:50+00:00): Thank you for the tip, I'll investigate.
Strubbl (2021-07-23 12:19:07+00:00): Hallo AndyKPtb, vielen Dank, dass du das neue Haus eingezeichnet hast und auch direkt die Adresse dazu erfasst hast. Du hast in dieser Änderung noch einen Weg erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966581449

Worum handelt es sich hierbei? War das ein Versehen oder ist es zB. eine Grundstückszufahrt? Falls letzteres zutrifft, sollte man die Linie noch auswählen und mit den entsprechenden Eigenschaften versehen.
Strubbl (2021-07-23 12:19:47+00:00): Ach entschuldige. Hatte deine neuesten Bearbeitungen noch nicht gesehen. Darin ist es schon als Fußweg markiert. Hat sich erledigt.

Viele Spaß beim weitermappen!
5m4u9 (2021-07-23 06:12:22+00:00): hola, las areas verdes que no son parques las estamos poniendo en Bolivia como grass o cesped, area recreacional no tenemos y solo lo usan en países relacionados con el reino unido
eggie (2021-07-23 04:25:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback : Elk begin is moeilijk.. een parallelvoetpad zit hier vast aan de kademuur. Dat zou eigenlijk los moeten.
Je gebruikt BING als achtergrond . Die ligt verschoven. Beter PDOK actueel instellen.

Feedback

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-07-23 04:33:40+00:00): Haven aangepast. Multipolygoon verwijderd. pad door water verwijderd.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-23 04:33:01+00:00): Realiseer je dat al je tests daadwerkelijk in osm komne. Ik heb het stukje pad verwijderd
mvg
eggie
DaniëlV (2021-07-23 09:34:55+00:00): Dank, ik had 'm moeten verwijderen.
eggie (2021-07-23 09:36:52+00:00): No problem...  :)
Sandal man (2021-07-24 16:45:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966590570#map=18/40.86044/0.33487
Ei,
Us heu oblidat de posar un barranc aquí.

Salutacions Jan.
eggie (2021-07-23 04:35:02+00:00): De haven had ik al aangepast. 
'k Zie dat je PDOK gebruikt nu. Dat is natuurlijk prima.
gr eggie
user_11418917 (2021-07-22 22:49:17+00:00): Stop adding spam!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
aceman444 (2025-02-01 16:16:18+00:00): Sadly, all the changes are wrong here. The touched public transport stops are served by trolleybuses, not buses. And the English name of the Retia medical centre is just made up by you. Or what is the source?
GinaroZ (2021-08-03 12:53:31+00:00): Hi, I've changed the gate you added to a cycle barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1918962852 - might be worth adding a bicycle=* tag to indicate access, see the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=cycle%20barrier
Hungerburg (2021-07-24 07:54:45+00:00): Hallo Heli, in Leiten diese Verkehrsfläche, Weg 965459518, das sieht nicht nur falsch aus - das ist auch falsch erfasst.
schwukas (2021-07-27 12:15:38+00:00): Hallo Semi,
du hast diesen in den letzten 8 Tagen 11(!) mal geändert, hinzugefügt oder gelöscht. Diesen vielen Änderungssätze machen die Situation sehr unübersichtlich. Weiterhin hast du dich scheinbar vor dem Eintragen nicht über die richtigen Tags bzw. das korrekte Format informiert. Bitte passe den Eintrag ein letztes Mal an und halte dich diesmal an die Beschreibungen, die du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki findest.
Semi52 (2021-07-27 12:39:18+00:00): Hallo Schwukas,
es tut mir Leid für die Umstände. Diesen Eintrag habe ich so oft geändert, weil es immer einen Fehler gab. Die Firma konnte man finden auf der Karte, nur wenn man drauf gedrückt hat, erscheint jedes Mal die Bushaltestelle Forschungszentrum. 
Beste Grüße
Semih