piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
priymose (2021-07-05 07:57:43+00:00):  Hello SafetyIng, 
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107424375) with suggested modifications. Good day! 
Regards,
priymose.
GOwin (2021-07-18 03:01:41+00:00): Hi there.

I noticed that your team in Grab is modifying a lot of street names, and reducing the information quality of the feature.

This street is originally called "M. dela Fuente Street", and despite what the shortened name you see from the sign board, this is still popularly referred to as "M. dela Fuente Street".

Use the short name tag if you like, if that's appropriate,  but be very careful when qualified names are already supplied by local mappers.

I am restoring the feature name to the original.
GOwin (2021-07-18 03:03:57+00:00): You mentioned KartaView as a source for this edit, but I don't see any publicly available imagery for this area:

https://kartaview.org/map/@14.60312777142336,121.00099567742188,21z

Can you please elaborate?
mahesh_a (2021-07-27 09:57:41+00:00): Hi GOwin, Thank you for the feedback, I have changed the street name based on the https://kartaview.org/details/3666921/476/track-info (Please enable HQ and 360 Panorama View). We agree with you and always prefer to follow local mappers' knowledge and local conventions. Happy mapping!
GOwin (2021-07-27 10:19:13+00:00): The response, and appropriate action is appreciated. Thanks!

We appreciate your team's contributions, but please be mindful of the edits next time.
Enock4seth (2021-07-20 23:38:59+00:00): Where is this reference imagery used? And wondering how your team decided to connect a residential road to motorway 2 years ago too https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637555403/history?
DeccanPlateau (2021-07-22 23:22:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with DigitalGlobe/Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is available in JOSM but where we do use more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source.

Based on the imagery, it looks like the connection to the motorway doesn’t exist so I decided to remove it. Thanks for mentioning that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
pitfire (2021-07-03 06:02:28+00:00): Hallo os-emmer,
wie viele THW Logistik Center sollen hier denn noch hin. Jetzt gibts schon 4 mal Hs. 17 mit 3 Logistik Center?
os-emmer (2021-07-03 18:47:52+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
vor kurzem ist das Logistikzentrum umgezogen an diesen Standort. Auf dem Gelände befinden sich aber auch noch die Regionalstelle Düsseldorf und der Landesverband Nordrhein-Westfalen. Da es sich um 3 verschiedene Einrichtungen des THW handelt die so zu sagen nur zufällig direkt neben einander stehen und deshalb die gleiche Hausnummer haben denke ich, dass diese als Getrennte Objekte eingetragen werden sollten. Hast du einen anderen Vorschlag, wie man das besser umsetzen könnte?

https://www.thw.de/SharedDocs/Organisationseinheiten/DE/Regionalstellen/Duesseldorf_Regionalstelle.html

https://www.thw.de/SharedDocs/Organisationseinheiten/DE/Landesverbaende/NW_Landesverband.html
pitfire (2021-07-04 10:14:16+00:00): Ja, kontaktiere mal User "4b696d "
und schau dir die diversen THW Relationen an. zB.
"Relation THW Landesverband Nordrhein-Westfalen (1595750) (als thw:lv) "
4b696d (2021-07-04 19:46:12+00:00): Moin,
im Prinzip hat os-emmer das gar nicht so falsch gemacht. Es ist tatsächlich so, dass hier 3 verschiedene THW-Dienststellen an einem Standort sind. Das Logistikzentrum, der Landesverband NRW und die Regionalstelle Düsseldorf.

Ich habe noch ein paar Anpassungen gemacht und das Logistikzentrum in die richtige Relation geschmissen.
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:56:23+00:00): Did you forget the driveway-tag?
rababdul (2021-07-06 10:46:17+00:00): Hi, 
Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I have edited the highway classification to driveway now. Please look into the changeset (107491058) with modifications. 
Thanks for the valuable feedback. 
Regards,
rababdul
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:56:34+00:00): Did you forget the driveway-tag?
priymose (2021-07-06 06:42:09+00:00): Hello SafetyIng, 
Thanks for checking into my edits. Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have now changed the classification to driveway. Happy to learn from you! 
Regards,
priymose.
om_mmyexplorer (2021-07-02 12:46:38+00:00): เขตควบคุม not เขตควยคุม
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:56:46+00:00): Did you forget the driveway-tag?
priymose (2021-07-06 06:39:58+00:00): Hello SafetyIng, 
Apologies for misinterpreting the driveway. I have made the changes as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from you! 
Regards,
priymose.
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:56:56+00:00): Did you forget the driveway-tag?
priymose (2021-07-06 06:53:41+00:00): Hello SafetyIng, 
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107475402) with suggested modifications. Good day! 
Regards,
priymose.
Владимир К (2022-05-07 12:57:44+00:00): Добрый день! 
Чтобы открыть движение, достаточно было убрать тег access=no, но не добавлять новые. исправил.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-03 06:55:12+00:00): Note that you deleted POIs such as restaurants, cafes and shops such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3942491571/history

Why?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-03 06:56:15+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2833032#map=17/37.97712/23.72809&layers=N
Cartographos (2021-09-03 08:53:39+00:00): Many of the shops were closed or inexistent in the first place. I will go and add them soon along with addresses for the buildings.
eggie (2021-07-11 07:12:30+00:00): Hoe zit het met de uitzondering voor tweewielers?
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-07-11 07:14:04+00:00): aangepast
Masyas (2021-07-04 00:43:07+00:00): 学校和公安局的部分用区域而不是建筑，不然会比较难看
城区内其他的信息随意吧 也可以参照常州市区，反正我已经放弃了，也许过几个月就会有人找上门改回去www
Shilie Jackson (2021-07-04 20:49:59+00:00): Hi! I'm interested why you've removed the name. The wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome) doesn't mention naming for private airstrips. Is this a more general thing or specific to aerodromes?
woodpeck (2021-07-06 07:40:48+00:00): Matt, I note that you have deleted the name if this airstrip twice, and that this is your only contribution to OSM for about the last twelve months. Please explain yourself. I don't share the notion that just because an airstrip is private it doesn't have a name. A quick online search shows that the name is well established.
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:54:07+00:00): You forget to add street, post code, city and country code
rkkapilk (2021-07-06 06:23:11+00:00): Hi SafetyIng,
Apologies for the miss from my end. I have updated the Street, City, Postcode and Country details from the available resources. Please look into the changeset (107473422) with modifications. Good day!
Regards,
rkkapilk
Futur3r (2021-07-03 16:55:14+00:00): Salut,

pour le chemin qui passe sous le bâtiment,
tu aurais pu le connecter au bâtiment et le sectionné à ce niveau la puis rajouter le tag tunnel=building_passage.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

J'ai fait la correction : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131093765

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107313301
hoancat (2021-07-02 14:59:09+00:00): perpignan, pas cabestany
SafetyIng (2021-07-03 09:58:26+00:00): Did you forget the driveway-tag?
priymose (2021-07-06 06:56:06+00:00): Hello SafetyIng,
 Thanks for the feedback. I have tagged the driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(107475525) for the changes made.
Regards,
priymose.
DaveF (2021-07-03 10:49:53+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify what route_ref refers to? Is there a TfL doc?
user_339547 (2021-07-03 13:01:47+00:00): Hi,
Sorry added by mistake. removed the route_ref now.
as for documentation the link I put in the "source" for my initial changeset links to some PDF's obtained from FOI request a few years ago. For lower-res images you can also view https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/2015/07/12/3d-maps-of-every-underground-station-ab/
abakus_uploader (2021-07-02 22:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kwiateusz (2021-07-02 22:48:58+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107333932
iWowik (2021-07-03 06:43:56+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Соблюдайте пожалуйста принятое соглашение о написании номеров домов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2
Пример ошибки
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863385455/history

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Владимир К (2021-07-05 20:46:46+00:00): Добрый день!
mariotomo (2021-09-08 16:55:53+00:00): hola.  a propósito del mapeo 3D, ya te puse una sugerencia en el https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108009424.
zstadler (2021-07-08 21:10:57+00:00): Hi,

I'm not aware of any official declaration of this area as a nature reserve. 

Please clarify. 

Thanks, 
Zeev
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-09 02:32:03+00:00): https://www.haaretz.co.il/magazine/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-MAGAZINE-1.9707266
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-09 02:53:57+00:00): Now that Im looking further into it, the official declaration is about a smaller area. I'll adjust the map
zstadler (2021-07-09 18:36:15+00:00): As far as I know, there is no officially-declared Nature Reserve in this place. The media coverage is about a local plan (תב"ע), which has not been approved yet.
Moreover, after such a plan is approved, the appropriate minister has to issue a declaration in order to make the planned area into an official Nature Reserve.

As far as I know, the Apollonia Eco-Park you mapped is also at some planning stage and is not an officially-declared Nature Reserve yet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8354876766

Israel has dozens, if not hundreds, of Nature Reserves in different proposal stages. Many of them have not made any progress for many years. In my opinion, there is very little value to the general public by mapping them in OSM, even if the mapping will be done using appropriate tagging.
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-10 04:51:07+00:00): Both nature reserves Glilot and Apolonia are great examples where the bolshevism of Israel's planning is changing to an environmental and community friendly policy. It is a very different situation from the hundreds of nature reserves mentioned, that are stuck in different proposal stages. Here we have two prolific communities, links below, behind these nature reserves. Hence the huge value by mapping them to the general public that will come and enjoy them. 

https://www.facebook.com/saveapollonia

https://www.facebook.com/groups/784023685329371/
zstadler (2021-07-11 15:51:40+00:00): I do not want to get into a political discussion. This is not the OSM way.

There is a clear definition for what a nature reserve means in Israel and the process for declaring one.

These initiatives are not nature reserves yet and therefore the current tags are incorrect.

If you want, you can use a lifecycle prefix, such as 
"proposed:leisure=nature_reserve". See the documentation at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. A similar tagging is used for planned/proposed highways.

A year ago, most of the area proposed the Glilot Eco-Park was landuse=farmland and the Apolonia Echo park was mostly natural=scrub.

If any of the areas was developed into  park, you may use "leisure=park" and have the public come and enjoy it.
Tsur Halamish (2021-07-18 08:50:28+00:00): Thank for your explanation. I've changed both to boundary=protected_area that can deal with all kind of protections and protection levels. As explained in:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
ZeLonewolf (2021-07-02 15:14:32+00:00): Hello, unfortunately I've had to revert this changeset, as you tagged a highway as Lake Winnetonka :)

Also, a gentle reminder that you have not responded to previous changeset comments.  It's expected that you work with other OSM community members that are trying to reach out to you.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-07-03 05:13:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Le nom (École Primaire du Moulin) est à renseigner une seule fois sur le polygone qui définit l'emprise globale de  l'école (bâtiments + cour etc.), et non sur chacun des bâtiments qui la composent.
J'ai donc supprimé les "name=" sur les deux bâtiments.
Sinon, bonne idée de s'attaquer à la hauteur des bâtiments. Si on fait ça dans toutes les écoles de Digne on aura de beaux rendus 3D :)
Supaplex (2021-07-03 10:17:23+00:00): 為什麼在馬里光瀑布後面加@？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107315084
Bexhill-OSM (2021-07-03 01:05:15+00:00): Hello!  Newer Bing Aerial Imagery has a terrible offset round Bexhill, it's better to use osmuk cadastral parcels here.  Hope you don't mind me reverting the change.
Diana Soldatkina (2021-07-05 09:47:10+00:00): Hello! I appreciate your participation and useful comment! Thank you for paying attention to this case.
Unbeatable101 (2021-07-12 01:47:25+00:00): Why did you make a park over what satellite imagery shows as houses?
ravali_78 (2021-07-05 04:27:37+00:00): Hi coshatiuav,
I have removed invalid turn restrictions.Kindly check with r10084442,r11778420,r10084445,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107413839.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107316362
marco406 (2023-09-24 16:48:33+00:00): Cześć, mam pytanie czym się kierowałeś dając drodze nr 160506456 kategorię unclassified? Znam tą drogę, jest to zwykła polna droga, utwardzona żwirem. Moim zdanie kategoria track / grade 1 byłaby właściwa.
Tak to wygląda: https://maps.app.goo.gl/XJ2542A1Sb3B4eHs6
stick2 (2021-07-02 15:02:08+00:00): The solar panel removed, NE corner of Bramley Close, looks fairly clearly there on Bing imagery.
trigpoint (2021-07-02 15:09:54+00:00): You have also deleted part of Mirabelle Road, is there really no connectivity?
Holly_Tree (2021-07-02 15:16:12+00:00): There is definitely no connectivity, it is private land (an area of gravel) surrounded by heras fencing. No junction to Gotherington Lane.
trigpoint (2021-07-02 15:22:34+00:00): No even on foot?
Holly_Tree (2021-07-02 15:22:54+00:00): Not even on foot
Holly_Tree (2021-07-02 15:23:33+00:00): Unless you want to climb two fences and trespass.
trigpoint (2021-07-02 15:32:59+00:00): Thank you. it just looks very odd that a co-op would be built with new houses so close and not to provide a sustainable route between them.
Holly_Tree (2021-07-02 15:37:01+00:00): Agreed, and local residents hate having to explain to delivery drivers how to get into the estate when maps like this show a junction. There’s a planning application in progress for a community centre on the site.
iWowik (2021-07-04 04:07:37+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Frans S (2021-11-19 15:13:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please do not connect buildings to eachother with their nodes
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107317448
Lee Carré (2021-07-31 08:27:20+00:00): Seems to do the trick.

Thanks for adding the PoI described in my note 🙂. It's a popular one with locals, so deserves a proper survey to add everything fully. No rest for the surveyors.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Sandal man (2021-07-25 16:29:09+00:00): ¿Son también estas adaptaciones de Pokémon?
Si es así, quítelo y asegúrese de que se muestre la realidad.

Saludos Jan
V1LLORA (2021-07-25 16:52:07+00:00): Son adaptaciones reales
Sandal man (2021-07-25 16:59:02+00:00): ¿No veo las características del agua en tus fotos?
Estanque Patos y los otros dos.
V1LLORA (2021-07-25 19:29:59+00:00): Miralo en google maps que se ven claramente los estanques de agua. No busques agua azul, es agua verde que se confunde con la vegetacion
Sandal man (2021-07-25 20:13:14+00:00): ok bien para mi
jeslop (2021-08-04 14:50:51+00:00): Hola V1LLORA. 
Te agradecería que tuvieses en cuenta estas directrices a la hora de comentar tus conjuntos de cambios: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
No es posible utilizar Google Maps como fuente para la información en OSM, no disponemos de autorización para ello.
Veo también que usas nombres descripitvos (estanque de patos, tortugas), que no deben ser utilizados: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres (esto te servirá de guía para esta etiqueta).

Saludos
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2021-12-16 10:17:31+00:00): Hello! Did you see that you use different wrinting of the same information (for the number of rooms and sname of the staff)? I assume that the last information is also a private information: This should not be part of the OSM data!
blackboxlogic (2024-02-22 18:29:11+00:00): Regarding "name=Ballard Lane (Private)"
Please don't stuff other properties into the name field.
◪ Jarv (2021-07-02 23:04:51+00:00): I don't think that the entire footway on the southwestern side of the road is designated to bicycles as well. By the looks of it the sections around the edge of the roundabout is shared. Its very badly designed.
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2261338
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107319971
alanz (2021-07-03 15:40:00+00:00): I will see if I can take a physical look sometime soon.
alanz (2021-07-04 14:59:20+00:00): I took a look. Standing on the south west roughly aligned with the edge of that building, looking into the circle, there is  a sign indicating foot and bike traffic. There are no other signs further up, but I did not  go up as far as the Quarry lane intersection to check there.

So unless it changes midway from shared foot/bike to foot only, I would assume the whole section is shared.
mariotomo (2021-08-31 01:17:41+00:00): hola. la carretera que conduce a los dos muelles, sería mejor tenerla como "unclassified", en lugar que "service"? por lo menos los tramos hasta llegar a los muelles.
mueschel (2021-07-03 07:37:07+00:00): Hallo skyper,
Tags wie "traffic_sign:55" oder "traffic_sign:60:left" sind nirgends definiert. Bitte benutze das übliche Tagging mit "direction".
skyper (2021-07-03 10:47:44+00:00): Hallo mueschel.
Kenne mich im Bezug zu einzelnen Straßenschildern nicht gut aus. Wie funktioniert `direction` mit unterschiedlichen Schildern von mehr als einer Seite? Habe zumindest schon Schilder in drei Richtungen an einer Stange entdeckt. `forward/backward` funktioniert bei einem Knoten nicht. Also doch eine "node-Relation"?
Was gebe ich an, wenn mehrere Schilder nebeneinander hängen?
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
mueschel (2021-07-04 13:53:59+00:00): Wenn Schilder nebeneinander hängen, dann einfach mit ; trennen, so wie es auch das Tool ausgibt:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Wenn Schilder für mehrere Richtungen am selben Mast hängen, müssen sie auf unterschiedlichen Objekten gemappt werden. Es gibt keine verbreitete Methode, das an einem Objekt zu mischen.

Natürlich müssen die resultierenden Beschränkungen auch an den jeweiligen Wegen erfasst werden - das Schild kann nur ein zusätzlich erfasst werden.
skyper (2021-07-05 11:47:41+00:00): Ok, habe es geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107437699
skyper (2021-07-05 11:49:26+00:00): Klar habe ich auch versucht die Beschränkungen an den Wegen zu erfassen, soweit das halt möglich ist.
b-jazz (2021-08-24 05:25:20+00:00): What was the reason for labeling Christmas Tree Vineyard Lodge as a hostel? Was that a typo of hotel, or was there some reason to label it a hostel? I'm not sure that is accurate.
btwhite92 (2021-08-25 22:14:41+00:00): Hello,
The 'tourism=hostel' tag is defined as follows: "Hostels provide accommodation where guests can rent a bed in a shared room, sometimes a bunk bed in a dormitory, and share a bathroom, kitchen and lounge."

The maximum guest capacity here is 15 and lodging is described as "six ground floor rooms, each with a queen bed and private bathroom", with a shared living space and kitchen. This isn't an arrangement typical of what most people in the US would consider a "hotel" to be, and fits closely with the definition for 'tourism=hostel'.

Bradley
b-jazz (2021-08-26 16:27:03+00:00): CTVL has private rooms and private baths. That's just about what everyone in the US would consider a hotel to be. On a scale of 1-10 where 1 is a hostel and 10 is a hotel, I'd rank this place an 8. It certainly isn't something a hiker taking a college gap year from college would be able to afford.
btwhite92 (2021-08-26 17:07:38+00:00): Cool, sounds agreeable to me. The tag I gave was simply what I thought was the best fit given what info I could find about the location. If you have more detailed info then feel free to change it.
b-jazz (2021-08-26 17:14:18+00:00): I've changed it. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't stepping on any toes first and I appreciate the discussion on the topic. Thanks.
blackboxlogic (2021-07-09 14:18:55+00:00): Regarding way 960797718, the description talks about "White Oak Trail" but you've named this the "Red Oak Trail". A mistake?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107321227
YLT_2021 (2021-07-15 15:20:39+00:00): Thanks, I'm not sure if it was I who went back and changed it or someone else, but it appears (correctly) as Red Oak Trail now.
osmviborg (2021-07-02 17:54:28+00:00): Er der stadig konstruktionarbejde på Bornholmsgade?
mikkolukas (2021-07-03 12:00:02+00:00): Damn, jeg glemte at kigge på datoen for noten på konstruktionsarbejdet. Det må helt klart være overstået.

Hermed fjernet. Tak :)
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-07-02 18:00:59+00:00): منتظر برف سال بعد بودیم!