piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
khag7 (2021-07-17 02:14:01+00:00): This is not a real name of a place
GerdP (2024-07-03 05:32:19+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier seinerzeit eine Route "Ammerlandroute Alternativstrecke" erfasst. Weisst Du noch, wie die ausgeschildert war? Ist die noch existent?
Siehe auch meine Frage in der Community: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/relation-ammerlandroute-alternativstrecke/115498
Totor (2024-03-11 14:50:41+00:00): Hi MrBoot,
I know you added this a long long time ago, but is this location correct? In the middle of the sea?
cheers

Totor
MrBoot (2024-03-11 17:50:15+00:00): May be the maps were not so detailed that time. Since it cant be verified, remove.
MrBoot (2024-03-11 17:50:44+00:00): I dont know if fisherman still meet there.
lejodelutz (2019-08-15 16:27:56+00:00): La gare de Lutzelhouse, s'appelle MUHLBACH-LUTZELHOUSE
vrmap (2019-04-14 07:39:55+00:00): Ciao Fabry, 
assieme ad alcuni soci CAI veronesi stiamo cercando di controllare e completare la rete sentieristica. Ci siamo incontrati ieri ed abbiamo parlato del sentiero 651 che parte da Bocca di Navene confine regione ed arriva al rifugio telegrafo (relazione 1066068). Questa relazione l'avevi creata tu con questo changeset attribuendogli il nome "Alta via del Monte Baldo". Ho chiesto ai soci CAI che non sapevano dell'alta via, a loro risulta il 651. Ho cercato in internet ma non ho trovato nulla al riguardo. Tu hai qualche notizia di questo itinerario? è documentato? ci sono dei cartelli che lo segnalano?
wruano1990 (2014-12-05 05:41:25+00:00): perl bob.pl -w 5193851
SimonPoole (2015-01-02 12:12:22+00:00): In diesem changeset wurde Jessenstrasse und Oberibergstrasse verbunden und einen falschen doppelten Namen vergeben. Jetzt behoben.
Владимир К (2018-06-15 06:47:51+00:00): А гора невидимка почему в кавычках?
Это неофициальное название?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:31:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/814516995/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
PT-53 (2020-07-07 17:01:33+00:00): Hallo skyper,
kannst Du mir erklären um was es sich bei diesem fixme
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/79500938/history
konkret handelt?
Ich komme in den nächsten Tagen dort vorbei, kann aber mit den ganzen TMC-Merkmalen nichts anfangen.
Fragende Grüße
peyot (2017-02-26 22:10:20+00:00): 1ère modification !
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-03 18:36:48+00:00): Hello!

Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

But is PFM:garmin_type=0x2c04 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/820040003/history ?
Beddhist (2023-12-03 22:20:21+00:00): Hi,

The data used at the time was imported from Garmin maps I had created, using a script, which created these entries. It stands for Polish map format and the code used for that feature in the original map.

I don't think they serve any purpose, so feel free to delete them anywhere.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-25 08:04:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/820807887/history - that was supposed to be man_made=mast, right?
fx99 (2023-11-25 08:29:14+00:00): sure, thanks for correcting.
eggie (2021-08-03 13:27:15+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage daarom Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Allison P (2024-08-21 16:48:17+00:00): How do you deem minor roads like those around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14951155 as tertiary?
Baloo Uriza (2024-08-21 21:54:25+00:00): Might have overclassified some of those a notch and don't see a problem with those being listed as unclassified.  County roads tend to be tertiaries generally but Osage County is a strange duck.
DeBigC (2021-02-23 04:50:40+00:00): At the R139 to the east of the M50-M1 junction there is a lot of waste ground, but it isn't grass. I have changed the shape of it and redefined it as scrub and woods. There used to be a wild woods here prior to the development of the area and what I have mapped are its remnants
trigpoint (2018-11-25 18:13:47+00:00): Hi, has this construction been finished yet? 
It was added 8 years ago and still nothing on any imagery which seems a little odd. 
Cheers Phil
RichardB (2018-11-26 23:56:00+00:00): Not sure. I remember going through there a few year ago when there were some roadworks ongoing, but perhaps that was to the south closer to Llanrwst. Maybe these were completed and the ones to the north dropped at the last minute. Doesn't look to have happened. I'll delete.
Mashin (2020-07-15 19:17:11+00:00): This is a bit time traveling, but do you remember, which park it is?
BJD (2020-07-17 03:23:08+00:00): I'm sorry, I don't remember; the history shows me editing both parks within this AOI.  (I think I was pulling in some geometries from a state of CT dataset...?)  If I can find the original dataset, I'll see if they were tagged with a name.
Mashin (2020-07-17 17:48:35+00:00): Thanks for checking. Don't sweat it if you can't find it.
BJD (2020-07-21 10:50:40+00:00): Aha.  Okay, so, in the original dataset that I had, both of the areas in this AOI in the source dataset were called "Mianus River State Park Scenic Reserve".  But in the latest one -- https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/GIS-and-Maps/Data/GIS-DATA#Property -- the northern polygon has no name.
BJD (2020-07-21 10:52:54+00:00): Scratch that, user error; it's still called "Mianus River State Park Scenic Reserve" in the latest dataset.
Mashin (2020-07-22 05:55:34+00:00): Perfect! Thanks for checking it for me.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 22:49:58+00:00): This import added a lot of duplicate water features.  Is there any plans to merge the duplicate data?
ArtyCarty479831 (2015-09-12 04:49:27+00:00): As you can see, this import happened 5 years ago.  I don't believe it added a lot of duplicates at that time; I eliminated all the overlaps and duplicates I could find.  I'm not aware of any specific plans or cleanup efforts related to it since then.  It's crowd editing at this point.
MajaMaravic (2019-02-27 11:25:46+00:00): Hello, 
do you have an information why tag service=industrial;mining  should  be left that way, because Osmose recognizes it as a mistake and there is no such tag at Wiki OSM. 
Regards, 
Maja
eggie (2020-05-02 20:16:58+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage... daarom .. Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
HAmap (2023-10-22 20:31:58+00:00): hier wurden Waldabeilungen mit einer 2-Punkte-Linie angedeutet. "Dornbühl" und "Fichtig" sind deren Eigennamen. Ist das so üblich? Oder sollten die Waldteile als Fläche eingtragen werden?
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-17 06:04:20+00:00): Du könntest mal die ganzen falschen noexit-Einträge löschen, davon gibt es sehr viele in Essen.
mariotomo (2021-11-19 16:17:04+00:00): … using maps from the IGNTG.  pffffffffff.
GerdP (2015-10-30 16:28:32+00:00): please review node 830477419:
the tag highway=directions
is rarely used. Is it a traffic_sign=* ?
GerdP (2015-10-30 16:29:56+00:00): it is also used on node 838047570,
nowhere else in OSM
Alex McKee (2015-10-30 21:09:57+00:00): It is a waypoint, a marker on a footpath. I marked the node with this tag because sometimes on rural English footpaths it can be very difficult to find the path. I hoped it might be useful to a future user or editor. I don't know of a more appropriate tag, feel free to retag if you so wish.
GerdP (2015-10-30 21:17:01+00:00): hmm, not sure if I understand that.
Bing shows a way in the grass which is not
in OSM. Is that the footpath you are talking about? If yes, I'd prefer to map it as such.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-31 00:12:08+00:00): Perhaps "tourism=information; information=guidepost" like http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost ?

Or if it's just something that points in a certain way for a long distance path, perhaps "tourism=information; information=route_marker"?
Strubbl (2022-06-14 18:32:18+00:00): Hallo Christian, magst du bitte mal in den Hinweis unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3211753 reinschauen? Weißt du da mehr?
dikkeknodel (2018-12-08 11:06:08+00:00): Hi schmandr,
By now I have passed along quite a few places where the E4 is mapped in Switzerland [1] here at OSM, but so far I have not found the E4 to be signposted anywhere in the real world. 
This seems to violate the principle: Verifiable - means that others can go there and see for themselves if your data is correct (see [2]).
Since you started this relation and added at least a few of the stretches which I passed along and could not find any signposting, could you please enlighten me about the source of your information?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/963212
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
schmandr (2018-12-08 22:12:00+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel

In Switzerland the E4 is signposted, but quite sparsely. Opposed to the national hiking routes that are marked with their number on every signpost, E4 signs can be found only on "main signposts" as an additional sign. The signs seem a bit dated, and I assume that they aren't maintained seriously anymore. But still, they are there. So from my point of view the information is verifiable, but for verifying, you need to find those selected spots. I've seen these signs e.g. on the town centre signposts of Rorbas, Andelfingen, and Truttikon, and at the "Herenbänkli" (Irchelturm) singpost. These signs read "Europäischer Fernwanderweg 4 Pyrenäen - Jura - Neusiedlersee". I made pictures of them when I mapped the Diesldorf to Stein am Rhein section 8 years ago. See e.g. [1].

Was it really me that started this relation? I thought it was just the Diesldorf to Stein am Rhein section. Anyway, my source of information for the St. Cergute to Dielsdorf part is/would be local knowledge and knowledge about the Swiss hiking network: I know that regional and national hiking routes in Switzerland are all based on the local waymarked trails. And that international hiking routes mostly follow the national hiking routes. And e.g. [2] confirms that "[der Jurahöhenweg] bleibt bis zum Verlassen der Schweiz der Begleiter des E4".
My source of information for the Dielsdorf to Stein am Rhein part was that same web page [2] for knowing about the rough directions. Then I went out there with my bike and followed the yellow singposts. Here again, my local knowledege and my knowledge about how the Swiss hiking network works helped me find the right path.
An example: So I knew from [2] that E4 leads from Bülach to Dorf. Looking at any hiking map, I could guess which paths I had to follow. So I went there, cycled along those paths, and in Rorbas town centre and at "Herenbänkli" (Irchelturm) I found the signs mentioned above. So I got confirmation that I was on the right path.

Here you have it. Hope that my procedure was compliant with the OSM rules.

Cheers,
schmandr

[1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jGuYdnnZnPTh6Mi9CHBs-W93e3x5i-cQ/view?usp=sharing
[2] https://www.outdoorseiten.net/wiki/E4#Schweiz
 and a few web pages like https://www.outdoorseiten.net/wiki/E4#Schweiz and
dikkeknodel (2018-12-09 19:02:21+00:00): Hi schmandr,
Thank you for your extensive reply. I already understood from reading somewhere that national route 5 is supposed to be the main part of E4 in Switzerland. Since I hiked the first three stages from Dielsdorf to Hauenstein and never saw a marking for E4, my doubts started. After cyling east of Dielsdorf on Friday, to capture some lwn relations :), also did not deliver any proof I thought is was time to figure out what was going on. 
I may have missed the additional signs you refer to though, since there are often more non-hiking signs on the poles I generally ignore any non-yellow signs. So I may have missed them.
I guess we should leave the E4 on OSM then. I've added a note to the relation about this discussion. 
And I doublechecked, you created v1 of E4 Schweiz here [1].
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4996431
aharvey (2018-01-13 01:57:47+00:00): How about adding https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/club=surf_life_saving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/832348202/history?
marc__marc (2021-04-04 21:33:30+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/832565291
it's a soccer club ?
Regards,
Marc
utack (2016-02-06 12:01:13+00:00): Braucht die Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69670319
immernoch ein "fixme"?
utack (2016-02-06 12:01:47+00:00): Habe es mal gelöscht, laut Luftbild 2016 ist alles ok
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:42:19+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/833482109/history
user_11932834 (2022-08-11 09:13:22+00:00): hehe
Herr Huber (2023-09-23 12:24:39+00:00): Ich glaube, Du hast da fälschlich den Feldweg verlängert, stattdessen ist da ein Graben/Kleingewässer vergl. Lidar-Bild und TIM. flohoff hat natürlich erstmal einen Hinweismarker gesetzt den niemand ansieht statt Dich zu fragen...
Herr Huber (2023-09-23 12:25:11+00:00): Ich meine Weg: 69716160
SomeoneElse (2016-12-29 21:34:49+00:00): Hi,
I was tidying up after a new user who'd made a few unfortunate edits, and came across https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69886258 , which dates from rather earlier :)
It's mapped as "layer=1; tunnel=yes" - is that because it's in the air but covered?
Just check it wasn't accidental.
Best Regards,
Andy
randomjunk (2017-01-09 14:44:58+00:00): Yeah, it was deliberate :-)
The tunnel is basically a pedestrian bridge over the road and pavements integrated into a building.
DaveF (2017-01-09 16:00:59+00:00): As it's above ground level, would covered=yes be more appropriate than tunnel?
randomjunk (2017-01-09 17:34:23+00:00): As I remember it it's not really "open on one side", and just a passage through the building with a very subway-tunnel-like feel. Don't think I've actually used in in the last 6 years though so I may be misremembering.
DaveF (2017-01-09 17:42:19+00:00): Ah, I've never really agreed with the 'has to be open at the sides' argument, but as an alternative, how about tunnel=building_passage (72 711 occurrences)
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-07 02:31:05+00:00): Hello DuiNui, the digitization you have done is very neat, but it seems that there is a little bit that needs to be improved, namely related to data with the tag: natural = water. Because, based on the maxar imagery data at that location it is not quite right if there is natural = water digitization. Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/69969634
So I asked permission to do the deletion.
Thank you
zvenzzon (2021-06-03 06:12:47+00:00): Det är något som förhindrar cykelrouting förbi Brigadhuset. Från Surbrunnsrondellen i riktning mot lasarettet...

Skulle kunna vara barrier=bump_gate på cykelvägen.

Jag vet att det går att cykla förbi obehindrat där längs bussgatan, men minns inte exakt hur och på vilken sida. Ska försöka undersöka saken, om inte du har något minne av hur man tar sig obehindrat tar sig förbi där med cykel...?
AndersAndersson (2021-06-03 06:36:42+00:00): Barrier brukar förhindra routing.
Om det verkar rimligt, lägg in foot=yes och bicycle=yes så ska det lösas.
Jag tror du har bättre lokalkännedom än mig då det var många år sedan jag var där.
AndersAndersson (2021-06-03 06:37:37+00:00): Lägg in det på barrier-noden alltså. Ifall det inte var uppenbart :)
zvenzzon (2021-06-03 09:24:08+00:00): Fixat efter undersökning på plats.
AndersAndersson (2021-06-03 14:36:59+00:00): Toppen!
AndersAndersson (2021-06-07 21:23:05+00:00): Prata gärna ihop dig med Aerond om grinden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105948423
apm-wa (2020-03-26 03:29:33+00:00): A U.S. Customs office is not an embassy.  I have retagged this node.
MKnight (2018-09-14 16:11:47+00:00): Hi,
is that right, that the border of "Réserve Naturelle des marais de Kaw-Roura" is not on the same border like "Régina"?

like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/4.50883/-52.20752 you can see very small differences
Damouns (2018-09-19 06:33:42+00:00): You are certainly right, but I think that the borders of communes (Régina and Roura) weren't in OSM 8 years ago, at the time of the import of nature reserve borders. Someone should correct this by using the most precise data, but which one?
MKnight (2018-09-19 08:39:12+00:00): i cannot recherche precise data because im not speaking french. if you not know more like me, its ok :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-08 10:09:28+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1261589 ?
marc__marc (2018-11-14 21:17:55+00:00): Hello,

about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/462517103

what's our meaning of power=sub_station ?
according to the wiki, it's a depreacted tag with several meaning :
power=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
power=generator https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator
pipeline=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:pipeline%3Dsubstation

with the aerial imagery, it look like a power=substation but it's hard to guess it

Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2018-10-23 09:58:25+00:00): Hello,

in 2010, you add some "power by gas" object
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/842823835
what's the exact meaning ?
it's a small generator power by gas to produce electricity ?
or the gas tag is wrong ?
Regards,
Marc
MarkusHD (2015-05-21 23:30:48+00:00): Die westliche Zufahrt zur Sommerstraße wurde in diesem changeset aufgrund von Bauarbeiten für Autos gesperrt. Die Sperrung sollte dem Kommentar nach seit über 4 Jahren aufgehoben sein. Das ist das Problem am Mappen von temporären kleinen Baustellen. Betroffenes Straßenstück: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13217441 (Änderung in Version #8)
Protoxenus (2018-08-27 15:01:12+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast hier vor 8 Jahren einfach mal so  ein Hotel in die Landschaft gefeuert. An dieser Stelle befindet sich kein Haus und die angegebene Adresse gibt es hier auch nicht. Würdest du dich bitte um das Verschieben an die korrekte Position kümmern? 
Danke
surveyor54 (2020-11-10 08:42:06+00:00): Hi uboot,
du hast hier vor 10 Jahren eine WW-Relation angelegt, seit dieser Zeit hat sich hier nichts mehr getan.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1109793
Kann man die löschen?
user_5359 (2021-04-26 15:32:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/845052367/history: What is the meaning of the tag key=jlporras?
arvdk (2017-08-24 12:15:11+00:00): hoi peSHIr, Er is een note geopend over uw toevoeging van 7 jaar geleden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/993806 Ik denk dat u daar het beste op kunt reageren/oplossen. Bedankt! arvdk
Túllio (2017-09-13 12:43:26+00:00): Olá! Localização incorreta da Reserva Natural do Tombado!
katpatuka (2017-09-13 13:01:06+00:00): And what is correct?

Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador ?
naoliv (2017-09-13 14:15:06+00:00): From this shapefile http://sistemas.icmbio.gov.br/simrppn/shp/556/rppn/ it seems to be displaced.
The proper location is in red: https://i.imgur.com/hhngSQC.png
Note that the shapefile is in EPSG:4618 and needs to be reprojected to EPSG:4326 before using it.
naoliv (2017-09-13 14:30:46+00:00): I replaced the geometry in #52008965
katpatuka (2017-09-13 14:41:55+00:00): @naoliv: thank you :)
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-29 18:10:24+00:00): The tagging of camp site roads as "camp_site=<number>" is unusual here.  There is discussion on this topic now on the tagging@openstreetmap.org list.
j-wills (2016-03-30 16:46:16+00:00): Может уберём костыль?
Можно же сделать запрет поворота отношением через from, via, to 
в роле via сделать поперечный вей.
canfe (2024-02-24 11:45:22+00:00): Rimosso il nome dalla rotonda.
Raramente ne hanno uno, non lo ereditano mai dalle strade afferenti.
Luzandro (2024-02-02 11:31:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3881529
Papryczka (2025-03-21 20:25:28+00:00): Jakie są źródła tagów proposed dla dróg: 
osm.org/way/71216865
osm.org/way/71216864
osm.org/way/71216866
?
eggie (2018-06-22 13:32:49+00:00): na lange tijd weer aan het mappen daarom.. opnieuw .. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
lyctkel (2026-05-01 16:13:50+00:00): Hi LivingWithDragons,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/848083108 you added some information about things that could be recycled.
But what is recycled here? I don't understand:
recycling=bottles;small_balls;round .

- bottles could be glass bottles or plastic bottles
- small_balls: I have no idea
- round: I have no idea
I have adjusted the items somewhat to meet the standard for materials that can be recycled, but this does not yet correspond to the generally applied values for recycling:...
Perhaps you still remember that after 15 years.
Kind regards,
lyctkel
LivingWithDragons (2026-05-01 20:48:25+00:00): Hi lyctkel,

Even if I could remember (or looked at my photos), it would not be wise to edit OpenStreetMap with knowledge from 15 years ago. According to the edit history, the recycling bin had no label 10 years ago. There may no longer be a bin at all here.

If you wish to adjust the node in question, I suggest surveying it in person. I do not visit this area very often now (sadly) so can't do it myself.

Gregory (LivingWithDragons)
lyctkel (2026-05-02 06:58:35+00:00): Hi Gregory,
Thank you for you reply. You are right.
I left a fixme at that node.
Kind regards,
lyctkel
Sylvain M (2025-10-19 10:23:42+00:00): Hi @gps-newcomer,
Could you take a look at these two notes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5013108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5013109
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 08:47:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/849606345/history - shop=library here is confusing

have you wanted to map bookstore or library? Or something else?
Komet (2023-03-21 09:29:13+00:00): Habe den redundanten und teilweise fehlerhaften Point entfernt. Die "Bücherei" ist schon über das Gebäude  mit Tag:amenity=library korrekt erfasst.
Gruß Komet
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 15:03:22+00:00): Thanks!
rik_ (2019-06-19 14:35:30+00:00): Hi,

du hattest damals drei Leitungsfragmente[1], [2], [3] bei Pätz eingezeichnet.

Hast du da zufällig mehr Informationen/Quellen die bei einer Vervollständigung helfen würden?

Viele Grüße

rik

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71521444
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71521445
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71521446
MarcoR (2016-02-13 17:10:07+00:00): Ciao!

Non riesco a capire cosa sia la piscina del Ginepro... ho trovato un piccolo stagno tra i campi e la boscaglia, è forse quello?

Marco.
Guido_85 (2016-02-13 19:44:58+00:00): Ciao Marco,
si mi riferisco proprio a quello stagno. Il nome mi è stato fornito da mio zio, appassionato cacciatore, e credo che sia un appellativo informale tramandatosi nel corso degli anni.
MarcoR (2016-02-13 20:20:24+00:00): Ciao Guido!

Grazie per la risposta immediata!

Se non hai nulla in contrario, vorrei creare un laghetto (un'area con le etichette natural=water e water=pond) e trasferirgli il nome "Piscina del Ginepro".

Credi che possa andare bene?

Alla prossima,

Marco.
Guido_85 (2016-02-14 08:20:30+00:00): Buongiorno Marco. Non ho nulla in contrario ;-)
A presto.
aceman444 (2014-11-21 22:54:43+00:00): This changeset destroyed the roads at rest area Bavois. I have fixed it now.
marc__marc (2023-01-05 23:55:04+00:00): Hello,
what's the meanng of name:statcan_rbuid=3669063 ?
Regards,
Marc
Talitha IRM-ED (2022-12-16 05:42:50+00:00): Hi, Willi2006. Thank you for your mapping contribution. 
I saw there's a difference in the appearance of the water body between Esri Imagery and Maxar Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/71886209) and there are some highway crossing with it. If you have local knowledge or you know the latest condition of this area, would you mind fixing it? or if you have any other suggestions please let me know.
Thank you and happy mapping!
user_11166885 (2020-05-25 08:31:02+00:00): Ciclabile?