piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naveenpf (2020-09-29 15:43:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91567433
aharvey (2020-09-27 05:53:22+00:00): Usually there are no pedestrian signs where you can't walk, so assuming those are present here, then all good.
nevw (2020-10-21 11:23:43+00:00): Hi
there is an OSMI problem here and seems to me likely to be related to simplifying of the boundaries triggering the geometry error.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.09379&lat=-27.51818&zoom=12
Are you able to use the original dataset to check and correct thanks.
TheSwavu (2020-10-22 21:45:31+00:00): Two things:

1. There is not much point in commenting on changesets made using any of the PSMA import accounts. I signed them up using a disposable email address so I don't know where the notifications for these will be going.

2. The OSM Inspector test is incorrect. You can have touching rings, but they can only touch at one point.

That said these appear to be artifacts in the PSMA dataset, so if you want you could trim these bits off.
TheSwavu (2020-10-23 00:17:48+00:00): All of the boundaries did pass JOSM's validator without warnings before I uploaded them.
nevw (2020-10-23 01:33:02+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.
TheSwavu (2020-10-23 08:29:32+00:00): No worries. Sorry about the stoopid response earlier. There is no way you could have known that the import accounts don't go anywhere.

I've found a few of these little artefacts in the SA/TAS data.
nevw (2020-10-26 09:47:01+00:00): Hi
I downloaded the geojson from here
https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-6bedcb55-1b1f-457b-b092-58e88952e9f0/details?q=psma%20qld%20suburb
opened in QGIS and saved as a shapefile and found that the OSMI geometry errors were just a couple narrow strips of land that were simplified by merged nodes, So I used the shapefile to fix up. It looks fine now.
Warin61 (2021-05-10 04:30:43+00:00): HI,

The Qld Heritage Register is not listed as a source on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland

Note that CC BY 4.0 is not acceptable to OSM.
rennicm (2021-05-10 11:01:33+00:00): Your reason for deleting the site from OSM is not adequate. The Qld Heritage Register was not the source of geographical location. I have visted the site and personally located it, before access was stopped by the current leasees. Please more fully explain the reason for deletion. In quoting the Qld Heritage Register only the formal name of the monument was taken as the source.
Warin61 (2021-05-11 07:05:13+00:00): The tag 'source'  stated that the source was the Qld Heritage Register. No other source was stated on the nodes (2 off). No comment nor source was given on the change sets. There was nothing to indicate any other source other than the Qld Heritage Register. 

If you want to avoid this occurring in future .. be careful with the source tag ... (source=name from Qld Heritage Register, location and feature from gps survey ?) and contact the  software author for help with providing comments?
SomeoneElse (2020-11-10 16:06:35+00:00): I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224313023 has a name that should be "North" in it?
TheDutchMan13 (2020-11-11 05:01:22+00:00): Yes, thanks for catching that.
❤️‍🔥 (2020-09-27 10:42:32+00:00): Hi, you changed the status of the New Lynn to Avondale shared path from "construction" to "proposed" 

Could you please explain why you made that change? Construction is underway right now, see page 3 of https://at.govt.nz/media/1983299/at-new-lynn-avondale-path-newsletter-july-2020.pdf Construction is also clearly visible on Maxar Satellite Imagery
CoyKoi (2020-09-28 09:12:35+00:00): Agree with kylenz. The feature was correctly tagged with highway=construction and construction=cycleway, as should be done for a feature which will become a highway=cycleway when construction is complete.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91568479
CoyKoi (2020-09-28 09:26:17+00:00): I would suggest reading the OSM wiki pages on highway=cycleway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

and for highway=construction:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
Daniel Mau (2020-09-28 09:34:14+00:00): Im sorry, I have made a stuff up, when I found one part of the path to be wrong I assumed the whole party was wrong. Thank you for the links and Ill make sure to verify better next time. Sorry again and thank you for being patient. Although it had said Highway hadn't it?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91568479
CoyKoi (2020-09-28 09:57:00+00:00): No worries Daniel, thanks for following up. Yes on OSM the "highway" key is used for all sorts of paths like cycleways, shared paths, walking trails.. etc.
❤️‍🔥 (2020-09-29 09:21:42+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91694519, also updated the route to tie into the new roads in the Kāinga Ora development
Jan-Peter (2020-09-28 06:18:26+00:00): Wat is jouw idee om het te Taggen ? Het is mi niet de bedoeling dat de bezorgers er met hun fietsen doorheen gaan maar slechts bedoeld om de achtertuinen te bereiken. Dus private aan de ene kant een goede optie aan de andere kant is het wel toegankelijk ..
goedegazelle (2020-09-28 07:53:44+00:00): Wegen en paden hebben geen hogere bedoeling. Als er niets staat aangegeven dan mag iedereen er komen, tenzij je weet dat het privé is. Het is de kunst om gegevens niet zelf 'in te vullen' op basis van vermoedens.

Paadje achterom:
highway=path
path=service
service=alley

De tag 'service' wordt meestal uitgelegd als 'de laatste honderd meter' en 'alley' is een pad of weg achterlangs of tussen de schuurtjes door.

Uitzonderingen ontstaan als er bijvoorbeeld een fietsbord of wandelaarsbord staat, of een bord met "verboden toegang."

Overigens ben ik erg blij met nieuwe mappers in de buurt.
mueschel (2020-09-29 13:08:38+00:00): Hi,
what does 'service:vehicle:RACQ' mean? This is not used in other places.
GrahR (2020-09-29 22:00:21+00:00):  The Royal Automobile Club of Queensland Limited (RACQ) is a motoring club and mutual organisation, providing roadside assistance, insurance, travel, finance and other services to its Queensland members. It is a member of the Australian Automobile Association.
Cruise Mechanical and Towing is a contractor who provides roadside assistance. 
I could not find a tag which directly indicates this. It i useful for a member requesting assistance to know where it might be coming from.
mueschel (2020-09-30 17:11:03+00:00): Thank you for the explanation!
I checked Taginfo and couldn't find anything about RACQ and other automobile clubs as a property of POIs.
I think that 'service:vehicle' is a bit strange for this, because this key is usually focused on kinds of repair provided.
Yours is somehow a cooperation of this company with another one. Maybe we can find a better tag in the future.
tastrax (2020-10-03 00:45:57+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
GrahR (2020-10-03 20:15:58+00:00): Hi tastrax
Thanks for your help. I am just learning to edit, and had not got to the phone tags section!  There will be other numbers I'll progressively check as I continue
Regards
Grahame Rogers
Mir76 (2020-10-04 15:55:35+00:00): А почему вы вот эту полянку
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266134596/history
сделали озером?
Zbigniew_Cz (2020-10-13 21:06:30+00:00): Wzruszyła mnie Twoja edycja, ale jeśli jakiś odcinek już jest wybudowany, to niekoniecznie musi mieć tag construction=.
eggie (2020-09-27 08:27:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 08:31:16+00:00): Review.. Hier staat nog 
note	= Oudemanshof	bij de tags. Zal waarschijnlijk weg kunnen. 
MVG,
Eggie
mev wxs nl (2020-09-27 14:56:47+00:00): Op de kaart gemarkeerd stond de hoek tussen de Pekelharingstraat en de Kruislaan. Daar begint ook de zijstaat die Oudenmanshof heet.
Kan ik op openstreetmap.org zelf editen of notes zien? Ik gebruik nu de app StreetComplete die wel gemakkelijk is.
eggie (2020-09-27 15:22:54+00:00): Dag mev wxs

Je kunt gewoon de kaart bewerken in openstreetmap.org  De online-editor is iD.
Dat is een simpele editor.
In de welkomstmail zit een link hoe e.e.a. werkt. Best lastig in het begin, maar al doende leert men en vragen staat vrij.
De note=  was trouwens van de voorgaande mapper. Wellicht wist hij/zij geen raad met dat stukje straat. 
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 08:29:20+00:00): Iets aangepast.. De pitches zijn nu de velden. 
MVG,
Eggie
BCNorwich (2020-09-27 09:11:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the Primark POI as it duplicates the data on the mapped building outline.
By the way, I think you got the number wrong.

Regards Bernard.
limes11 (2021-02-16 19:09:05+00:00): Hi,

Can you check

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2541182

? 

You tagged this way as hw=path, it had been hw=residential for many years. What is correct? Is it a bicycle road? motor_vehicle=yes?

Cheers, Limes
nurdafur (2021-02-16 19:34:02+00:00): Hi Limes

I can not recheck this road for I live in Switzerland and not in Goslar. As far as I remember there was the traffic_sign DE:240 at the start of the road. I cycled along Bäringerstraße.

Cheers, Urs
limes11 (2021-02-16 20:20:59+00:00): Ok thank you very much! Will forward this.
zzcolin (2024-02-16 14:55:25+00:00): 被 iD 忽悠加了 ford=yes？如果路是以一座简单的桥的形式跨过河的话，正确做法是把属于桥的这部分路切出来添加 bridge=yes 和 layer=1。ford=yes 是给野外的过水路面用的。
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-30 13:25:59+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91573247
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-30 13:25:43+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91573168
PT-53 (2020-10-02 07:00:00+00:00): Hallo  maction,
diese, von Dir eingezeichnete Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851990068/history
hat keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
maction (2020-10-03 11:57:16+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Das Relikt ist entfernt.
Beste Grüße
Constable (2020-10-03 08:07:32+00:00): Ciao, vedo che hai aggiunto l'etichetta "bicycle=yes", tieni conto che su buona parte delle strade/sentieri quel tag è già sott'inteso, non serve quiundi aggiungerlo.
Buona continuazione, grazie, ciao!
_lele_ (2020-10-03 08:26:21+00:00): Il tag in oggetto serve a far sì che la traccia appaia colorata in blu su OpenCycleMap, cosa che, piaccia o no, rappresenta lo standard  de facto per individuare percorsi MTB sulle mappe OCM che, a differenza delle originali e di alcune derivative come OpenMTBmap, sono di tipo raster, fatto che le fa preferire ad altre vector-based quando usate con alcune app di navigazione, ad es. MyTrails.
UffeKousgaard (2020-11-08 21:12:46+00:00): Har du observeret dette vejnavn på stedet eller hvad er kilden til din ændring?
eggie (2020-09-27 09:13:44+00:00): Dag Rik.. er staat nog steeds amenity=bank?
brand=ambn amro 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91574101

Kijk anders even hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall
en wellicht 
office=government - An office of a (supra)national, regional or local government agency or department
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 09:28:25+00:00): ABN Amro info verwijderd.. office=government toegevoegd. zal neem ik aan tijdelijk zijn.
parsd51 (2020-09-29 17:01:16+00:00): Hi kielius-kiel

Please use local names for (signed) names. If German names are needed, please put them in with :de tagging.

The same goes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847951710

Greetings
parsd51
DP24PH (2020-09-27 10:26:50+00:00): NOTICE TO ALL MAPPERS: This emergency reversion reverses the erratic changesets 91525496, 91525760, 91544031 that caused PT routing anomalies (including conflicts), and expect normalisation of all Bus, Jeepney routes thru OsmAnd Live.
Moreover, if you have any feedback, don't forget to discuss here or DM DP24.

Be safe, be well, stay sane, and you are loved.


DP24
aceman444 (2020-12-03 06:52:49+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie novej cyklocesty. Avsak okolite cesty ste zbytocne poposuvali na nespravne pozicie podla zastaralych snimok Bing. Prosim pouzivajte letecke snimky Ortofotomozaika SR.
VA00 (2022-03-18 15:08:45+00:00): Rysowanie ścieżek na podstawie lidaru to grząski temat. Prawie żadnej nie zauważyłem idąc, a nie ma wegetacji. Sporo zniszczono przy kładzeniu rurociągu, a jeszcze go nie zasypano.
Mapper022 (2025-03-29 13:47:25+00:00): Az Aquincumi múzeum túloldalára rajzolt falak nem ekkorák, ilyen irányúak. Itt volt régészeti kutatás, de a megtalált falakat betemették, műholdkép alapján nem lehet feltérképezni őket. Javaslom az általad odaképzelt félrevezető falak törlését.
opendcc (2020-09-27 09:56:57+00:00): Hallo,

Fahrverbot mit Ausnahme Grundanlieger wird mit motor_vehicle=destination oder private getagged. Access=no bedeutet hingegen eine komplette Sperre z.B. wegen Bauarbeiten.
bxl-forever (2020-09-29 14:20:05+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for reflecting the new numbering scheme.
I am not sure changing the "network" tag into "Express" is a good idea.  It breaks many queries and destroys the uniqueness of the network.  Was this discussed with the community beforehand?

I suggest route relations and route master relations keep "network=TEC".  Perhaps you want to add "bus=express" on individual route relations if you really need that.  Otherwise, other tagging schemes have been proposed but are not yet supported.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Differentiation_for_routes_of_public_transport
ToniE (2020-09-27 10:42:29+00:00): Servus CR77,

ich sehe auf der Karte und in den Daten, dass dieser Way fast mitten auf der Kreuzung einen Cycle-Barrier hat.

Erstmal würde ich den, wenn es den tatsächlich gibt, nach weiter südlich verschieben, an die reale Position.

Aber! Existiert der tatsächlich?

Zweitens: du erwähnst "Relationen". Diese Straße ist aber nicht Teil irgendener Relation?

Gruß
Toni
gscscnd (2020-09-27 19:02:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
abakus_uploader (2020-09-27 22:33:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
noelbov (2020-09-27 15:00:10+00:00): 92-93 unused segment is not fixed: see
https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/nl/RouteUnusedSegments/be/rcn 
nb.
dvdhoven (2020-09-27 15:22:17+00:00): I have reverted this changeset so it doesn't fix anything.
I can't repair this route, better said, the route is OK, only knooppunt.nl thinks it is not OK.
The problem is the node with rcn_ref 93 at Rue Noir Mouchon/Rue Chemin du Stoquois.
Knooppunt.nl detect this node and from here you must use a tentacle.
That means that only one direction route from here to the other 93 will satisfy knooppunt.nl
The solution is to remove this node 93
noelbov (2020-09-27 17:47:28+00:00): It's fixed now by creating a route from 93 (at Rue Noir Mouchon/Rue Chemin du Stoquois)
to the other 93 (connection point of 2 cyclenetworks)
regards, noelbov
lakedistrict (2020-09-27 19:41:38+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your recent edits. Based on the store addresses, I think the URL you've added actually belongs to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319475977? This new branch inside The Range doesn't appear to be listed (yet) on Iceland's store finder.
Robert Whittaker (2020-09-27 21:50:20+00:00): Thanks -- I think you're right. I've move the website as you suggested. (It seems that the outlets they have inside "The Range" stores don't appear as branches on the Iceland website.
lakedistrict (2020-09-27 22:15:57+00:00): Thanks.
marc__marc (2022-08-23 11:42:51+00:00): Bonjour,
au lieeu de la clef author, je vous conseille artist_name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artist_name
Cordialement,
Marc
thbz (2022-08-24 12:32:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez raison, je me suis manifestement trompé une fois et j'ai répété ensuite l'erreur par copier-coller. Je viens de corriger 10 ou 12 médaillons dans le jardin du Luxembourg et le Louvre, j'espère ne pas en avoir oublié. Il faudrait d'ailleurs que j'y repasse à l'occasion pour voir s'ils sont toujours là.
Merci !
marc__marc (2022-08-25 16:24:31+00:00): Merci pour le correctif rapide.
il en reste apparement 2.
je vous laisser corriger, sinon je m'en occuperai
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ll9

au lieu de source=survey, je vous conseille également survey:date=AAAA-MM qui permet plus facilement d'aller revoir les objets qui n'ont plus été vu sur le terrain depuis longtemps

Cordialement,
Marc
thbz (2022-08-25 16:53:41+00:00): Voilà qui est fait. Merci pour la requête Overpass.
czubi (2020-09-27 10:53:01+00:00): bitte adressen nicht doppelt eingeben, danke
naveenpf (2020-10-01 10:14:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala


Can you please review your edit ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91578426
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
Jethron (2020-10-13 12:30:43+00:00): Thanks for adding your business details to OSM. The area that was provided was incorrect, but that's already been improved.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91578559
eggie (2020-09-27 12:45:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review. In OSM Nederland wordt in principe bijgetagd op de adresnode.
Dus niet op het gebouw zelf.
Verder hoort er dan een shop tag bij
shop= supermarket
Dat geeft dan een symbool op de kaart en maakt een zoekslag mogelijk in gps of routeplanner voor iemand die op zoek is naar een supermarkt.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 13:17:15+00:00): De info heb ik van het gebouw gehaald. De node die vast zat op dat hoekje heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode nr 48
Alle begin is moeilijk.
shop=supermarket toegevoegd. 
Dit waren je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91578724
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 12:34:40+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
Overigens is Makelaar	=	Verkoopmakelaar
geen valide tag in OSM..
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 12:40:51+00:00): De regel Makelaar=Verkoopmakelaar heb ik verwijderd en tevens de ralatie met de multipolygoon van het koopcentrum van Hilversum.
MVG,
eggie
bxl-forever (2020-09-27 14:53:42+00:00): Hello,
Uniqlo was already on the database.
I see you are using MAPS.ME.  Please be aware that this software usually uses outdated data.  This is probably why you create a duplicate.
I suggest you update your data source.
bxl-forever (2020-09-27 14:55:51+00:00): A question about this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/474985856/history

name=AB Delhaize
name:fr=Louis Delhaize

Why is the name different in French only?
eggie (2020-09-27 12:47:55+00:00): Maar is de info van de Spar ook daadwerkelijk hier verwijderd?
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 13:11:59+00:00): Supermarkt verwijderd
Frans S (2020-10-15 10:38:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Something went serious wrong. You mapped  nearly all buildings for the 2nd time ,so duplicating them.
See attached document and the video which expains how this could happen
Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Tomas_J (2026-07-25 09:17:31+00:00): Ahoj, tu  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7947520417) a inde si nespravne oznacil, ze priechod ma ostrovcek. Opravil som. Daj na to, prosim, v buducnosti pozor. Dik.
4b696d (2021-02-19 16:46:48+00:00): Moin,

Regionalstelle und Ortsverband sind zwei ganz verschiedene Einrichtungen, die hier praktischer Weise in einem Haus sitzen. Ich habe deinen Änderungssatz dahingehend rückgängig gemacht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 86835594, 86835746, 86835806, 86835818, 88995139, 88995209, 88995248, 88995356, 88995431, 88995502, 88995518, 88995583, 88995610, 88995627, 88995669, 89872396, 89872608, 89872753, 89872918, 89872984, 90712714, 90777109.
Crogan (2020-10-03 07:55:11+00:00): Это пешеходная дорожка, зачем поменял на дорогу? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743149710
Тут нет автобусной станции
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443751701
sorcrosc (2020-09-27 16:10:37+00:00): You have created a duplicate road and moved a node from another country. Reverted.
eggie (2020-09-27 12:50:44+00:00): Wanneer is niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster
Alles is import vanuit de BAG
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=andromeda%2031&resultOffset=0&objectId=0197200000037670&geometry.x=236371.796&geometry.y=437954.182&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0197010000003856
Gr
eggie
eggie (2020-09-27 15:56:26+00:00): Dag AvanMarle,

Het duplikaat adres heb ik verwijderd van woning. Er zijn al adresnodes aanwezig inde vorm van adresnodes. 
Dat zijn zo van die afspraken die voor OSM Nederland gelden. 
Geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. 

MVG,
Eggie
Rogoyski (2020-10-11 09:36:16+00:00): Skąd pomysł, że ten parking jest prywatny i to jeszcze podziemny? Nie jest, każdy może zapłacić i zaparkować. Poprawiam.
Awizonosz (2020-10-20 13:16:58+00:00): Obydwa parkingi są płatne, ogrodzone i zamknięte gdzie wjazd jest możliwy jedynie za opłatą, czy w takich przypadkach jest to parking otwarty? Parking podziemny to błąd ponieważ w tym miejscu nie może być takich miejsc musiał mi się źle kliknąć w SC.
Rogoyski (2020-10-20 20:02:57+00:00): Tak, tak jak wyjaśniłem przy innym zestawie zmian, to wciąż jest parking otwarty ("publiczny"), bo zaparkować w ramach wolnych miejsc może każdy (a nie np. pracownicy danej firmy, mieszkańcy danego osiedla czy osoby, które mają miejsca parkingowe na własność). Owszem, pobierana jest opłata, ale o tym mówi inny tag (fee=*).
Patr1k_P (2021-11-10 14:09:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55924295

na tomto chodniku nepatri tag name...naucne chodniky sa robia formou relacii a ta v mape uz bola

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/568998
Sanniu (2020-10-21 05:33:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852023832 - as no tags. Can you, please, add appropriate tags?
Larmax (2020-09-27 12:04:35+00:00): imagery_used = Espoo - Ortokartta; Espoo - PKSkiinteistokartta;Mapillary and own streetlevel