piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2022-03-11 08:51:36+00:00): Dag Jan,

Beter geen Kadaster-adressen veranderen en dan gaan schuiven.
Nu kloppen de adressen niet meer. 
Maximaplein 7 zal ontbreken en De Hank 4 komt nu 2x voor.


Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118351046

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-11 08:54:17+00:00): Maximaplein  7weer hersteld...   De Hank 4 info samengevoegd met adresnode 4
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-12 17:27:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570235782/hsitory? Why don't you edit the street next to it?
user_5359 (2022-03-12 17:30:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570235783/history? A building on a highway? Please notice also your other typos!
user_5359 (2022-03-12 17:34:39+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570235784. Why don't you edit the street? Please notice your typo of the highway value. Use residendial instead	residencial (only well known values are draw on the map: You delete the way on the map!)
abakus_uploader (2022-03-11 23:32:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
PT-53 (2022-03-12 07:14:54+00:00): Hallo Alina,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast die Daten für das Parkhotel doppelt in OSM eingetragen, einmal am Gebäudeumriß und einmal als separater POI-Knoten.  Doppelte Eingaben sollten nicht sein. Ich habe daher den separaten POI-Knoten wieder gelöscht.

Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
AlinaTamara91 (2022-03-14 15:17:59+00:00): Hallo, 

wie kann ich das Parkhotel als Übernachtungsmöglichgkeit hinterlegen? Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe. 

Herzliche Grüße, 
Alina Fenzl
PT-53 (2022-03-14 15:27:42+00:00): Hallo Alina,
für das Parkhotel
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159536116/history
 ist - am Gebäudeumriß - bereits das Merkmal
- tourism=hotel
eingetragen. Was dies bedeutet, kannst Du hier im Wiki nachlesen:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=hotel?uselang=de
Ich frage mich allerdings, ob 
- tourism=guest_house
nicht passender wäre? Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house

Grüße
AlinaTamara91 (2022-03-14 16:54:23+00:00): Ja das wäre passend. Können Sie das einstellen?
PT-53 (2022-03-14 17:04:16+00:00): Hallo Alina, 
ich habe das Merkmal tourism wie gewünscht auf "guest_house" abgeändert:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159536116/history
Grüße
AlinaTamara91 (2022-03-14 17:08:54+00:00): Bei anderen Hotels wie z.B. unseren Nachbarn wird ein Bett angezeigt. Somit können Gäste gleich erkennen, dass man hier übernachten kann. Besteht die Möglichkeit das bei uns auch so zu hinterlegen?
PT-53 (2022-03-14 17:23:20+00:00): Das ist doch beim Parkhotel auch der Fall, jedenfalls  auf dieser Internetseite !?
Wo schaust Du nach ?
AlinaTamara91 (2022-03-14 18:13:06+00:00): Hier direkt bei open Street Map
PT-53 (2022-03-15 06:36:30+00:00): Auf dieser Internetseite (Internationaler Kartenstil)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.91323/9.76204
wird ein Bett und der Name Parkhotel in allen Zoomstufen angezeigt.
Auf dieser Internetseite (Deutscher Kartenstil) 
- https://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html
ist das noch nicht auf allen Zoomstufen der Fall. Das kann noch ein bischen dauern.
Leo Slager (2022-03-13 17:49:51+00:00): Dag Dick,
de Traayweg, O van Austerlitz heb ik toch maar teruggezet naar highway=tertiary.
Tenslotte reed ik daar van de week nog overheen met 60 km/uur en fietsers waren er niet, die reden op het naastliggende fietspad. :-)
dvdhoven (2022-03-13 19:36:23+00:00): Dank je.
Met gebruik van Shift+R gaat het wel eens mis als je de verkeerde geselecteerd hebt en dat niet in de gaten hebt.

Vriendelijke groeten
Dick van den Hoven
Scottie0001 (2022-03-15 01:21:11+00:00): Do you have any intentions on adding on the 667 route Sunday service to Burpengary?
Scottie0001 (2022-04-10 10:49:14+00:00): Do you have any intentions on adding on the 667 route Sunday service to Burpengary? It is shown as a route on the Translink website and Translink documents.
user_5359 (2022-03-12 17:23:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570377166. What is the meaning of the tag Highway = secondary on a node? Why don't you edit the street next to it?
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
atuito (2022-03-13 22:09:47+00:00): Hi, just to clarify - there is in fact pedestrian access around the south side of the motorway junction at Clevedon, but I think your changes are okay as the separate footpath remains unchanged. Best wishes.
Syl (2022-03-11 15:36:05+00:00): Bonjour, cette station est à supprimer ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1248493012
Laurene Morhan (2022-03-11 16:10:02+00:00): Bonjour, 
Non pas encore - elle va rester ouverte quelques jours/ semaines avant sa fermeture prochainement. Je la supprimer d'OSM lorsque cela sera effectif
user_5359 (2022-04-08 19:20:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039278102/history. Please notice the value of wikidata must start with a Q character.

May I ask you for a information: What is the source of the keys starting with it:fvg:regional_catalog:...?
ivanbranco (2022-04-08 20:09:45+00:00): Should be this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fiumi_FVG

It's an import that was never cleaned up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-11 12:37:40+00:00): Please don't remove points from related features.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-11 12:38:59+00:00): 2. This breaks the `type=cluster`
user_5359 (2022-03-16 07:35:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199579276. What is the meaning of the tag depth:mindepth = 4.4?
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-16 10:33:25+00:00): I don't know.
user_5359 (2022-03-16 10:46:29+00:00): Sorry wrong change set!
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-16 10:48:52+00:00): For further discussion see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118301677
gscholz (2022-03-13 06:13:04+00:00): Hi Vicky MD,
your recent changesets have created errors int the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=106.11700&lat=-6.28192&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118354785

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_5359 (2022-03-12 17:38:09+00:00): Hello again! Why did you add node with 
highway	pathway
surface	unpaved
( See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570425337)
And why did you misspell the keys (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570425338/history)
ndm (2022-04-09 22:23:42+00:00): Can't see any no pedestrian signs on Mapillary -- looks reasonable for horse riders too.
ndm (2022-04-09 22:30:00+00:00): Can't see any "no pedestrians" signs on Bing Streetside.
ivanbranco (2022-03-11 22:06:12+00:00): Hi Stephen,

as I already tried to explain you (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117973822):

names should not be descriptions. So name=hut+building=yes
should be
building=hut
ptarac (2022-04-03 20:25:27+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że tagowanie AED jest niepełne. 
Urządzenie z opening_hours=24/7 bez podania dokładnej lokalizacji, czyltagów defibrillator:location, indoor, access jest, w mojej ocenie,  wątpliwe oraz mało wiarygodne.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-14 15:53:16+00:00): Hello,
Can you specify what Near Map imagery you have been using here and what license is in effect for that use?
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
pmarkina_lyft (2022-03-15 11:41:19+00:00): Hi, Marc Zoutendijk!
My name is Polina and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you so much for paying attention to this. 
I want to assure you that the Lyft mapping team takes the OpenStreetMap rules seriously and that all of our resources are compliant with them. We have a special agreement with Nearmap that allows us to use their imagery that we pay for in our OSM editing. To make edits we often use Nearmap aerial imagery and we have one for this location that is dated 10-09-2021. But for fixing lanes tags we used the proprietary street-level imagery as it is more up-to-date than Nearmap - the Nearmap imagery automatically got to the imagery_used tag at the changeset properties, as it was active in the iDeditor while we were applying the edit. The proprietary street-level images are the ones from Lyft’s drivers taken during rides in various regions. 
As to the discussed case we used these proprietary street-level images:
near the node n606255857-   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-_tHxCI565-sE4bN6iRdweyo-BBGYqGe/view?usp=sharing - dated 03-05-2022; 
near the node n9570442050- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q_1Oq3blSSSmjkosOStKWOKP3cGDREnn/view?usp=sharing - dated 03-04-2022; 
near the node n1534798861-
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNvXICpqEZO83ZrPPZlWbywfNmQPLSJj/view?usp=sharing - dated 03-04-2022; 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XsTkRhV9NmnM2Eq8se4POv6Aa8NbOLRd/view?usp=sharing - dated 03-09-2022.
Best regards, Polina
marczoutendijk (2022-03-15 13:23:35+00:00): Thank you for this explanation!

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-05-09 15:53:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5597731. What is the meaning of the relation type=m?
LACDH (2022-05-10 04:45:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing that out, it was meant to be "route".
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 21:06:30+00:00): Felixkirk not Fearby
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-03-11 11:07:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.

Please notice the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304731912.
blacx (2022-03-12 01:19:32+00:00): Hey, nice work with the buildings, but for drawing them please use the "Catastro Spain" background instead of the PNOA, usually it is a lot more accurate.
HaPe-CZ (2022-03-14 07:48:24+00:00): Thank you, I know catastro spain, but sometimes it is also not up to date. The big problem is that it loads very poorly. First load ok. When you zoom in and out or move the substrate, it stops loading.
eggie (2022-03-11 10:39:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Best lastig om te beginnen met OSM.
Je hebt een node verplaatst en dus ook naast het water het gras meegenomen.
Dat loopt nu als een hele smalle strook tussen bos en water. 
Het bruggetje aan de noordzijde zal geen brug zijn maar een duiker.
waterway=drain
tunnel=culvert
layer=-1 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118356172


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-11 10:58:30+00:00): De verschuiving in het gras het ik er weer uitgehaald.
De brug heb ik verwijderd, maar dat was een bijdrage van een andere mapper,
Mapse
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-11 11:17:34+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kein Grund das eingetragene Gebäude aus der Karte zu löschen :). Ich werde die Information vom Gebäude in einen Knoten überführen. Bei einem Gebäude kann man übrigens kaum von leisure=resort sprechen (das wäre eher ein Hotelgelände mit mehreren Gebäuden).

Neuer Eintrag siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9570557392
ftcat (2022-03-11 10:41:25+00:00): Hi mapwitch,

This is a task I have looked at and shied away from. Just a question, when you breakup large multipolygons such as this how do you ensure they remain associated with one name that does not now appear in each new section?

Another technical point regarding the Okavango Delta. I does not neatly fall into any of the wetland categories, in fact it is part of the Zambezian flooded grasslands ecoregion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zambezian_flooded_grasslands) which would imply it is more accurately a wet meadow rather than a marsh, both render in a similar fashion though.
mapwitch (2022-03-11 11:20:48+00:00): Yes, it's a big challenge, but now I'm almost done with the first pass. Currently all relations are named "Okavango Delta (Part xxx)", this helps me to keep the overview. Still some parts are bigger than recommended in the wiki, I have to divide them further. (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Size: "... up to 300 members".) At last, all relations should be combined in a new relation, which will be just called "Okavango Delta". 

I have only made a technical division, no adjustment of the tags. This can be done later by other mappers if necessary.
ftcat (2022-03-11 12:47:35+00:00): I understand the concept of a 'super relation' but not seen an example. Would this relation just act as a container without any tags beside the name? Or would it have the tags relating to the object, in this case wetland and wetland type while the 'child' relations have no descriptive tags and what roles do the 'child' relations have within the super relation?
mapwitch (2022-03-11 14:35:53+00:00): I am not sure. Super relations are described in the wiki only for paths, not for areas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:superroute). I would therefore only use it as a container with the name tag. In addition, it would also have to be considered whether it makes sense at all to name exclusively the wetland relations as "Okavango Delta", because the water areas, the rivers etc. belong to it as well. And these are not currently part of it. A super-relation could combine them all. So different wetland types could also be part of it.
ftcat (2022-03-11 20:42:21+00:00): I watch with interest.

One way to reduce the number of ways in the relation is to join some of them. I know the user who did a lot of the intricate mapping of the delta likes to use many small segments. He also uses tracks and other highways as parts of the relation. This means the tracks and highways end up being cut into small segments, if anybody comes along and decides to join up these segmented highways the relation will be broken. The tracks and highways are not part of the relation anyway they just run along the edges. Also any tracks running along the edge of the wetland may not be permanent and in updated imagery they may not appear and so a mapper may decide to delete them and again the relation is broken. This is particularly a problem when novice mappers are part of a HOT project
mapwitch (2022-03-12 16:36:50+00:00): Yes, a lot of work would need to be done here. My goal is first of all to make the "Okavango Delta" relations manageable.

It would also be possible to create a large "Okavango Delta" relation containing only the outermost boundary. All other relations would then be configured as "wetland" without a name. What do you think of this idea?

Currently there is only the way of a "collection" relation, which contains all "wetland/Okavango Delta" sub-relations.
ftcat (2022-03-12 19:09:35+00:00): I had also considered the idea of a relation made up of only outer most ways and think this is worth a try.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-03-11 16:20:42+00:00): Hallo christophenglert,

Baumfällschneisen bzw. Rückegassen sollten gar nicht gemappt werden, da es sich nicht um echte Wege handelt. Meiner Meinung nach solltest du den eingezeichneten Weg komplett entfernen.

Bitte nutze den name-Tag ausserdem nur für den tatsächlichen Namen eines Objekts, nicht für eine Beschreibung. Eine Baumfällschneise IST eine Baumfällschneise, aber sie HEISST nicht so.

Gleiches gilt auch für die anderen von dir in den letzten Tagen bearbeiteten Wege.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-01-23 20:15:16+00:00): Hello CelsoR,

I am unable to confirm your application of access=no. By applying access=no, to my knowledge you are indicating that this road is not accessible by the general public, not even to pedestrians for walking. However, I do not see any evidence of this in South Africa CD:NGI Aerial, Mapillary, Kartaview, or Bing Streetside. Can you share the resources that support this tagging decision please? I would be extremely grateful. you cite local knowledge. Do you live in this neighborhood?
PT-53 (2022-05-24 07:15:02+00:00): Hallo whb,
Du hast in diesem CS u.a. diesen Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136337357/history
voll gesperrt.
Wie lange wird diese Sperrung voraussichtlich andauern?

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Ich frage wegen eines Hinweises in brouter-suspects.
whb (2022-05-24 17:35:41+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

die Dauer der Sperrung ist mir unbekannt.
Die denkmalgeschützte Sandstein-Bogenbrücke wird Stein für Stein abgebaut und dann wieder aus den Originalsteinen 80 cm breiter und mit Betonkern wieder aufgebaut. Das wird schon etwas dauern.

Viele Grüße
whb
PT-53 (2022-05-25 06:01:50+00:00): Hallo whb,
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Ich gehe davon aus, daß Du bei Fertigstellung und Freigabe die Sperre in OSM wieder aufhebst und werde dann beim nächsten Erscheinen (nach 14 Tagen) den Hinwies für die max.möglichen 999 Tage wieder verbergen.

Grüße
eggie (2022-03-11 10:43:58+00:00): Alle tagging zal conform de conventie van OSM 'moeten' Je kunt dus niet zomaar iets invullen.
De taal is dan UK English

De taging heb ik aangepast naar service=parking_aisle
oneway=no heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet op reguliere wegen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-11 11:05:00+00:00): Tip.. Zoek steeds in de wiki op welke tagging  mogelijk is 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

Dat is in het begin veel werk, maar dat wordt steeds makkelijker.
gr eggie
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-06-17 14:05:23+00:00): Hello,
it's not a good idea share nodes between roads and landuse (areas) 

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/17501/when-mapping-polygons-surrounded-by-streets-should-they-share-nodes-or-be-traced-separately

Cheers
   Alessandro
mavl (2022-05-20 15:42:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
jacularis (2022-03-11 10:32:44+00:00): Porque acho que são placeholders: 
- Ruas em portugal são prefixadas por "Rua" ou "Praceta", etc; 
- As duas ruas têm o exato mesmo nome
topolusitania (2022-03-12 00:11:20+00:00): Olá.
Os dois troços "residential" com o nome Bairro da Horta da Areia estão identificados como tal no SIG do Municipio de Faro. Não é raro que a mesma rua possa ter dois troços separados fisicamente entre si.
jacularis (2022-03-13 19:26:20+00:00): Á, não sabia. 

Já agora, o SIG de Faro (https://www.cm-faro.pt/pt/menu/330/sistema-de-informacao-geografica.aspx) parece uma excelente fonte. Pode-se usar o SIG como fonte? Os termos e condições do site (https://www.cm-faro.pt/pt/menu/1394/termos-e-condicoes-de-utilizacao.aspx) dizem "A reprodução de conteúdos é autorizada mediante indicação da fonte". 
Só para confirmar, posso usar, mas tenho que anotar a fonte nos objetos com tag source= ou uma menção no changeset basta?
topolusitania (2022-03-14 11:00:46+00:00): Zona um pouco nebulosa. Seguro será colocar a tag source nos objectos.
Eu usei a SIG para descobrir o que o C. queria dizer na Avenida Anibal C. Guerreiro. Atenção às importações massivas pois devem ser discutidas pela comunidade ( oficial: mail list Talk-Pt ou na"oficiosa" Telegram OSMPortugal)
philippec (2022-03-11 20:20:41+00:00): Vorselaar Thomas More AED.
Waar is de ingang ?
Waar hangt de AED precies ?
H4N5-antw (2022-03-11 22:23:45+00:00): Hier lopen twee berichten stromen dooreen : heb zojuist geantwoord op uw PM binnen OSM; daar antwoordde u op met referentie uit een Excel bestand; 

vanaf straat is dit waar u gedurende schoolperiodes en - uren het gebouw binnen kunt, blijft dat AED aan gemeentehuis 24/7 beschikbaar is ...
user_5359 (2022-03-12 16:54:56+00:00): Hallo! Kurze Frage zum callname="Florian Erfurt 21": Läßt sich dieser nicht berechnen aus amenity = fire_station ("Florian"), addr:city ("Erfurt") und ref=21? Oder gibt es von dieser Logik Abweichungen?
aceman444 (2023-07-16 12:26:09+00:00): Zdravim, "Kamenny kriz" co nazvu nie, ak to nie je oficialny nazov (nieco ako Biely kriz v Raci). Ak je z kamena tak material=stone.
A inak to vyzera skor na nejaky pamatnik lebo su na nom napisy, ale neviem o com. Ak sa v tej oblasti pohybujete, bolo by vhodne zistit co je tam napisane a vedeli by sme to upresnit v OSM.
man_made=cross sa pouziva na krize, ktore nemaju ziadny iny vyznam (napr. kriz na vrchole stitu, alebo nieco pri ceste, co nema ziadny napis ani to nie je pamatnikom na nieco.
Pavol33 (2023-07-16 13:26:16+00:00): Ahoj, teraz to uz neviem zistit
NieWnen (2022-03-12 11:50:19+00:00): Co to znaczy private property i dlaczego usunąłeś te ścieżki?
Dostępne podkłady nie sugerują, żeby tam było cokolwiek, co by blokowało przejście, a orto sugeruje ścieżki.
Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 20:52:22+00:00): Burton Agness not Burtersett

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oyl
Dodko (2022-03-11 14:24:50+00:00): Do not use
amenity=place_of_worship
but it is better
historic=wayside_cross
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=wayside_cross
Patr1k_P (2022-03-12 11:19:48+00:00): a to name tam takisto nepatri
Shaun das Schaf (2022-03-11 16:32:12+00:00): Hallo,

du hast die Hausnummern von den Gebäuden 7, 9 und 10 alle auf "7-9" geändert. Bist du sicher, dass das so richtig ist?

Ist es nicht eher so, dass sich die Blank Metallbau-Technik GmbH zwar in den Gebäuden mit den Hausnummern 7 bis 9 (oder 10?) befindet, aber die Gebäude trotzdem noch die Hausnummern 7, 9 und 10 tragen?

Du hast die Gebäude außerdem als "Einzelhandelsgebäude" gekennzeichnet. Auch das ist doch eher falsch. Ich nehme an, es handelt sich um einen Industrikebetrieb und nicht um einen Einzelhandel....?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Blank Metallbau-Technik GmbH (2022-03-14 07:13:28+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf,

Ist es nicht eher so, dass sich die Blank Metallbau-Technik GmbH zwar in den Gebäuden mit den Hausnummern 7 bis 9 (oder 10?) befindet, aber die Gebäude trotzdem noch die Hausnummern 7, 9 und 10 tragen? - Ja, dass ist richtig, Blank Metallbau erstreckt sich über die Gebäude 7-9 in der Max-Eyth-Straße. Industriebetrieb ist auch richtig, ich hatte da nicht das richtige gefunden. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Dodko (2022-03-11 14:28:36+00:00): the mark is used for the statue
historic=memorial
memorial=statue
or
artwork_type=statue
tourism=artwork

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial%3Dstatue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Dstatue
Kovoschiz (2022-03-30 05:10:16+00:00): Please don't detach points from `=ridge`.