piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mink (2021-11-12 04:27:31+00:00): Hi iandees, 

Thank you for the concern. I am aware of all the moving parts, relations, and connections that come with georeferencing and OSM data editing. I usually use existing roads unless it's an extensive stretch that will need to be redone, so I will sometimes create a new way in that instance. I am mindful of existing data like bus routes and highway relations, and tag the new way with any of those parameters accordingly. I've been mapping for OSM for about 13 years so I'm fairly versed in that regard.

Cheers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113676288
iandees (2021-11-12 04:55:10+00:00): I've been mapping for 15 years myself, so I can appreciate the effort that you're taking here. I'm sure you also know how difficult it is to look back at the history of deleted OSM objects, so it would be great to re-use existing features so that you don't remove history of existing work on a map feature, especially when it comes to important features like major roads. I know that iD makes it easier to delete and remap, but the little bit of extra effort to improve existing features is really helpful. Anyway, continue enjoying mapping and have a great evening!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113676288
mavl (2021-11-13 09:10:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменяет статус дороги с tertiary на residential. Это неправильно. Транзитные улицы должны иметь тот же статус, что и подходящие к ним дороги.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification  
  
Этот пакет правок добавляет название улицы "8 Марта". В OpenStreetMap указывают полное название улицы - "улица 8 Марта".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
Этот пакет правок имеет комментарий "на карте нет улицы". Это не совсем правда. Улица на карте есть. Названия у неё не было.
MapSpot (2021-11-12 04:35:34+00:00): The changeset aims to fix a multipolygon river area which was not fully incorporated into a relation (not including its inner areas). If any issues arise with the relation due to these intended fixes, leave a comment.
Warin61 (2021-11-15 05:34:08+00:00): Hi
relation 13431424 has two shared segments - against the 'rules'. 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.79667&lat=-31.64247&zoom=17
ortho_is_hot (2021-11-15 12:05:45+00:00): Ah nice catch, thank you, I will re-do the relation so it fits better
timetrap (2022-02-08 22:49:48+00:00): Die Änderung des Weges https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870737305 beeinflusst potentielles Fahrradrouting negativ. Der Weg fing vorher auf dem Kreuzungsknoten an, um eine bessere Navigation zu ermöglichen.

Weil ansonsten könnte ein Navi den Radweg von keiner der Straßen  wählen.
rthik007 (2021-11-15 06:51:08+00:00): "Hi Delbs,
I have changed the classification of road from unclassified to  track as it is not leading to any destinations.
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113789176.
Thank you.
"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113678563
DeFra85 (2021-11-12 15:06:01+00:00): Hey, ein paar deiner Änderungen an einigen Häusern scheinen irgendwie nicht so ganz richtig zu sein.
Warst du bei den Häusern vor Ort?
sebastianha (2021-11-12 15:09:28+00:00): Moin,
ja, ich laufe da gerade überall rum. Hast du ein konkretes Beispiel? Manchmal ist die App da komisch.
sebastianha (2021-11-12 15:10:42+00:00): Vielleicht vertue ich mich auch generell? Da bin ich über Hinweise dankbar, wenn ich was anders taggen soll!
DeFra85 (2021-11-12 16:30:54+00:00): Nee, nix gravierendes!
z.B. ist die Stettiner Straße 48 kein Einfamilienhaus. Zumindest seit ein paar Jahren nicht mehr, sondern mittlerweile ein Mehrfamilienhaus.
In der Mühlenstr. 25 ist zwar im EG das Café mit Backstube, aber im OG sind auch noch Wohnungen. 
Bei der gemischten Nutzung ist das eh immer schwierig was man nimmt, deshalb lass ich immer einfach als building
JAAS (2021-11-18 17:14:53+00:00): Buen día Saira16. De qué tratan estas ediciones al mapa? Da la impresión de ser algo bien intencionado, aunque aparentemente mal ejecutado. Con gusto puedo apoyar a hacerlo correctamente. Saludos!
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 15:39:07+00:00): Hola JAAS, ¿has recibido respuesta de Saira16? Todas estas ediciones parecen completamente erróneas y el DWG tiene previsto eliminar todas estas cosas.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 19:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114828622 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incorrect edits to the map due to the use of incorrect tags.
JAAS (2021-12-12 12:20:54+00:00): Hello Marc,
In response to your previous message: No, I never received any response from Saira16.

The data was obviously incorrectly entered by any OSM standard and I agree it was in general a useless contribution from this editor (Saira16).

I appreciate you looking into this matter and resolving accordingly.

Jorge Aguirre
JAAS
PT-53 (2021-11-12 07:02:56+00:00): Hallo dez,
warum hast Du an diesem POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7019317265/history
das Merkmal
service=tyres
gelöscht und dafür das Merkmal
service:vehicle:car_repair=yes
eingetragen?
Daß KFZ-Reparaturen vorgenommen werden ergibt sich doch bereits aus dem Merkmal
shop=car_repair

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-11-16 07:35:33+00:00): Keine Antwort, Schade.
Änderung zurückgesetzt.
user_8101879 (2022-06-26 16:42:35+00:00): Hi,

the way 1001636747 has no tags.

Best regards
MapSpot (2021-11-12 07:00:59+00:00): Note: The adjacent river Dora Baltea already uses the tags natural=water + water=river to define its corresponding river area. This tagging nomenclature has been applied to the river Chiusella to avoid inconsistency.
vsahith (2021-11-12 07:16:02+00:00): Added access restrictions based on Driver feedback.
MapSpot (2021-11-12 07:30:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1120336/history
To maintain consistency with tagging schema used on the larger adjacent river Po (linked above), river area tags have been modified. This minor change will improve indexing of water and river areas in northern Italy while rendering the same way as waterway=riverbank on all modern platforms.

If there are any additional concerns, please leave a comment on this changeset.
canfe (2021-11-14 11:04:40+00:00): Carissimo, il ragionamento è corretto ma il tag riverbank, come da wiki, è riservato per il "large rivers" e non per piccoli torrentelli che ben conosco essendo ex pescatore della zona.
Quello che ho pazientemente mappato è il riverbed che è il letto del fiume dove il riverbank si sposta ad ogni piena annuale.
Pertanto se vuoi mapparti dove "c'è effettivamente acqua" e taggarlo riverbench, fai pure ma ti prego di ripristinare ciò che è in realtà il letto sassoso del torrente.
Tale affermazione è fatta notando che NON c'è acqua con NESSUNA delle possibili immagini aeree.

idem per https://osmcha.org/changesets/113681819
MapSpot (2021-11-14 19:13:39+00:00): Thank you for the kind clarification! I will Return to these two rivers later this week to add additional tags for certain sections, including intermittent=yes, seasonal=yes, and landcover=* in order to more accurately represent where actual water is located, where the river reaches during annual floods, and the stony terrain on the ground during dry season.

This solution should hopefully help preserve the accuracy of your riverbank contributions without sacrificing consistency with adjacent rivers.
MapSpot (2021-11-12 07:29:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1120336/history
To maintain consistency with tagging schema used on the larger adjacent river Po (linked above), river area tags have been modified. This minor change will improve indexing of water and river areas in northern Italy while rendering the same way as waterway=riverbank on all modern platforms.

If there are any additional concerns, please leave a comment on this changeset.
user_11435438 (2021-11-12 10:02:38+00:00): 牛逼啊兄弟，晚上守墓地无聊画地图？
blblfdl (2025-02-25 15:40:25+00:00): 哈哈哈
eggie (2021-11-12 08:40:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  De verwijzing naar website en phone is niet aangepast naar Evos.

Klopt deze info dan nog steeds.
Zie je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113683185

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-12 08:47:05+00:00): Verder.. Op alle 'storages_tanks ' staat nog steeds operator=OilTanking Terneuzen

Klopt dit dan nog wel en 'moet' dat dan ook niet aangepast worden?

MVG
eggie
Gisser1957 (2021-11-12 09:41:07+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Het was de bedoeling om alleen de naam aan te passen, en natuurlijk ook alle storage_tanks.
Ik ga proberen om dat ook aan te passen excuses voor het ongemak.
mvg Joop
eggie (2021-11-12 10:04:21+00:00): Oke..  Succes .

Veel plezier met mappen... 
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
tkk (2021-11-14 12:04:06+00:00): Zdravim, prosim o lepsi mapovani informacnich ceduli - jmeno ma byt jen jmeno, cislo patri do 'ref' a jmeno NS pripadne do 'description'. Strkat vsechno do 'name' je dost nestastne, upravovat timto zpusobem existujici cedule je xhorsovani kvality dat.

Dekuji tom.k
Tajtrdlik (2021-11-18 06:59:11+00:00): Také zdravím. Ano beru na vědomí - v mapách jsme o tom bavili a budeme používat tento Vámi popsaný způsob.
aceman444 (2022-09-28 19:33:26+00:00): Not that this would be any improvement. Converting one unapproved tag to another. Do not try to solve problems the iD editor is suggesting you unless you know what you are doing. It is often wrong.

Also use proper changesed descriptions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
user_14250389 (2021-11-12 08:39:05+00:00): DEM模型似乎有严重偏移，难以作图，可能需寻求中国在地社区帮助
user_14250389 (2021-11-12 08:39:54+00:00): 从空照片看，风景还是不错的。有机会的话想去看看
IlBano (2022-01-26 16:41:43+00:00): Hi SekeRob.
In this changeset you added a restriction relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13431900) with a wrong type (only_u_turn) that doesn't allow access from Corso Mazzini toward Corso Cavour. Can you please check ?
Thanks

IlBano
SekeRob (2022-01-26 17:55:32+00:00): Oops, I slipped up in my previous life, in this one it is 'no_u_turn'. In fact, with 'only' Crispi also becomes inaccessible going south. Agreed? Fixed in a moment.
IlBano (2022-01-26 18:16:33+00:00): Fine. Thanks
7tonin (2026-05-26 15:37:47+00:00): Bonjour,
concernant le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001674733, pourquoi est-il dénommé mourjou2 ?
dafadllyn (2021-11-14 17:02:07+00:00): Salut ! Pourrais-tu ajouter un résumé de tes modifications s'il te plaît ? [^1] Ce serait très utile. Merci beaucoup d'avance !

[^1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
BBMaper (2021-11-15 07:46:55+00:00): Salut, J'ai surtout posé des adresses d'entreprises et corrigé un peu la géométrie selon la photo aérienne swisstopo.
Je vais mettre un peu plus de commentaires dorénavant...
Isaac CP (2021-11-12 09:52:12+00:00): ) La plaza del Bonsucces ha sido declarada parque según edicto publicado en el Diario Oficial de Catalunya: https://dogc.gencat.cat/es/document-del-dogc/?documentId=914068
Sandal man (2021-11-15 14:00:37+00:00): Gracias por modificar OSM, pero ¿qué has hecho aquí?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001685263
Ahora hay 3 carreteras en la misma posición y 1 incluso en la dirección incorrecta.
Jordi MF (2021-11-15 18:38:43+00:00): Efectivamente,
El Carrer de Jesús contiene un error con las direcciones.
También conviene que detalles mejor los cambios que realizas. Escribir 'cv' en cada cambio no es correcto.
Saludos,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2021-11-15 22:22:10+00:00): He eliminado dos vías que estaban superpuestas a esta otra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217952209
¿Era ese el problema detectado?
Jordi MF (2022-02-03 22:48:11+00:00): Revisando de nuevo estas ediciones, he visto que las área de las acera estaban mapeadas como si fuesen grandes áreas peatonales (area=yes + highway=pedestrian). Sin embargo, la wiki indica que las áreas de las aceras hay que mapearlas con area:highway=footway. He corregido algunas aceras que he podido detectar.
Saludos,
Jordi
CoyKoi (2021-11-12 21:42:52+00:00): Hi jayswipe, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding detail to footbridges. I've just reviewed your changes and everything is looking good - great to see footbridges named on the map! However this particular changeset appears to have duplicated an already existing man_made=bridge at the location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466900938/ Perhaps you only wanted to add a name to that existing feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113687175
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
eggie (2021-11-12 11:01:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Alle adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Beter dan niet de format van en/of  adresnummers zelf veranderen. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-12 11:03:15+00:00): Schuiven met de adresnodes kan wel.
Joetjah (2021-11-12 12:08:37+00:00): Hallo, dank voor het uitgebreide welkomsbericht en de feedback. Ik zal een nieuwe change aanmaken door adresnodes te verschuiven, en ik neem en kijkje naar Buurthuis De Knop want die is ook verhuisd.
eggie (2021-11-12 12:24:06+00:00): Oke.. De kadasterformat had ik al weer aangepast.
Wanneer een bedrijf..instelling verhuist dan alleen de instellingsinfo verwijderen en op het nieuwe adres bijtaggen..
Zolang hier geen dubbelingen voorkomen is het verder goed zo.
Mapse
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 07:44:40+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن غير صحيحة وعشوائية للخريطة العامة
SekeRob (2021-11-12 12:33:00+00:00): apologies, somehow I manage to often suffix a 'w' to tags and values, the ù too, fat finger syndrome I'm sure. Most get flagged in my error reports on Osmose and OSMi but that seems to be working only on frequently used keys. Bigger keyboard acquisition overdue (wireless) :O)

cheers.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
Vinber-Pro (2021-11-12 11:39:10+00:00): Salut Laurent, tu es revenu :) après une petite pause !
J'espère que tu vas bien ?
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113688743
Heinz_V (2021-11-15 14:53:59+00:00): Warum löscht du die geschätzte Kapazität bei Solar powerplants?
Oberaffe (2021-11-16 16:55:48+00:00): Hallo, weil ich mir diese Solar Powerplants angeschaut habe und die geschätzten Kapazitäten unlogisch waren. Außerdem finde ich das geschätzte Daten gleichgestellt werden können mit fiktiven daten. Da niemand später überüfen kann was jetzt richtig ist.
Grüße
Heinz_V (2021-11-17 05:58:24+00:00): Beachtet man nur die laut Sat-Bildern dort schon installierten Panels, so sind meine Schätzung recht gut. Vergleiche mit offiziellen Daten ergab meist Abweichungen bis ca. 30%. Die indischen Mapper finden meine Schätzwerte durchaus hilfreich. Bevor du weitere Daten kommentarlos löscht, bitte ich um Diskussion mit der indischen Community.
Oberaffe (2021-11-17 07:57:30+00:00): Ja genau, das ist mein Problem an geschätzten Werten. Wir werden niemals die richtigen Werte bekommen, weil ja schon was dran steht. Alle sind zufrieden, das irgendein Wert dran steht und niemand hinterfragt, ist dieser auch der richtige. 30% abweichung bedeutet , das die meisten Werte falsch sind und es auch für immer bleiben werden. Ich persönlich finde es immer besser etwas nicht zu mappen als falsche daten einzutragen. 
Trotzdem werde ich in Zukunft diese Einträge nicht mehr löschen! Auch wenn ich es furchtbar finde, das falsche Werte akzeptiert werden.
Grüße
Oberaffe (2021-11-17 08:31:16+00:00): ich hab mal die Datenqualität versucht zu prüfen, gleich beim ersten Solarpark gab es 50% abweichung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222885308
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SekeRob (2021-11-12 12:24:37+00:00): Hi there

Did they rebuild it since when I removed it some months ago, it was torn down only a small piece of the red brick torn down building wall left as barrier on the della Riviera side.

ciao and Happy Black Friday (if you're into that hyped shopping experience).
FinixFighter (2021-11-12 16:35:03+00:00): I only added the little building left there. I mapped it using aerial imagery.
Anyway I didn't even know that it was Black Friday! XD I hate consumism, I always try to buy everything in real life.
SekeRob (2021-11-12 16:55:24+00:00): Think it's the very building that's gone. In streetview went to the exact coordinates and there you can see the long red brick wall with that Instituto, half way  (never found reference to that archive either on the www). The re-construction has been taken forever. If weather permits I'll cycle by and take a pic. I was quite surprised they'd flattened it. (I went to look for the Staccioli and wondered where they'd gone). Maybe I was in the 4th dimension for a little ;o)))

ciao
SekeRob (2021-11-13 14:44:56+00:00): Sad news, they buildings is really really gone. There's now a plastic fence and a scaffolding around an empty space. Maybe they flattened it by accident and a rebuilding, but likely something entirely new. TBC

The good news is, 2 new buildings have appeared which look like being in finishing stages, up market, future design.

While there diagonally opposite a new BeCharge station for 2 cars. Also saw at Eni near the Uni something that looks like a new charging station. A black 2 meter 
 high monolith with BE on it, maybe Stanley Kubrick has plans. Did not look close as it started to rain...

ciao
FinixFighter (2021-11-14 07:59:19+00:00): Ok, I removed the building then. Better waiting until they finish :)
Hsonesson (2021-11-15 14:40:04+00:00): Hej osmviborg,

Jeg lagde mærke til at du havde slettet denne landuse, som jeg oprettede for et par dage siden.
Jeg er i gang med at oprette landuse i og omkring Kolding, og det kunne være behjælpeligt at vide, hvad grunden er til at du slettede den?

Mvh.
Henrik
osmviborg (2021-11-15 14:48:09+00:00): Af den simple grund at du havde hegnet hele området ind med 'landuse=grass'. Det meste af området består faktisk af bygninger og veje.
wkdgs (2021-11-12 13:51:17+00:00): Hi,

könntest du noch das Datum der Zählung hinzufügen?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:population.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113689325
Kai Johnson (2022-12-30 15:06:40+00:00): This is a private road on private land. Although this road is recorded in SanGIS, no name for the road has been recorded. I have surveyed this location in person and there is no signage for this road. I'll be removing the name from this road, although the name could be restored if there is a definitive source for the name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .