piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naoliv (2017-10-10 07:42:37+00:00): Dudiii, não se utiliza "track" (ou "Estrada agrícola" no editor que você utiliza) dentro de áreas urbanas.
Se a rua não possui pavimentação, apenas inclua o tipo de superfície correto (como "unpaved", por exemplo)
Não é porque a rua é de terra que ela deve receber uma classificação menor.
elifz (2017-10-07 03:32:46+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
elifz (2017-10-07 03:32:30+00:00): SOURCE:MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
elifz (2017-10-07 03:32:07+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS 2200A
elifz (2017-10-06 22:17:44+00:00): it should be amenity=university.
naomap (2018-01-07 12:04:12+00:00): Bonjour Richard.
Bienvenue sur le projet OpenStreetMap et merci pour tes contributions. Tu avais demandé une révision de ce changeset, aussi voici quelques remarques :
1/ Tu as ajouté un chemin avec le tag highway=footway. A moins que celui-ci soit interdit aux vélos il convient d'ajouter le tag bicycle=yes. Autre possibilité : oréférer highway=path mais la différence est subtile...
2/ Tu as ajouté le Menhir des pins. Il manque le tag "principal" qui définit de quel type d'élément il s'agit et permet aux moteurs de rendu de l'afficher sur la carte : tu trouveras les infos nécessaires sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:historic=archaeological_site
3/ N'hésite pas au passage à changer tous les highway=road (très vague) en highway=unclassified s'il s'agit d'une route ou highway=track pour les pistes.
Cordialement,
Antoine.
Glassman (2017-10-07 05:48:18+00:00): one small tip - we don't abbr. street names as software has a hard time unabbreviating names.
Nakaner (2017-10-08 20:12:02+00:00): Hallo Westwind,

sind jeweils wirklich die gesamten Dachflächen mit Photovoltaikanlangen belegt? Auch die Nordseiten der Satteldächer? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165079802

Falls nein, trage bitte separate Flächen für die Anlagen ein.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Westwind (2017-10-08 21:49:54+00:00): Hallo Michael,

hmm, schwierige Sache...separate Flächen suggerieren eine Genauigkeit, die man nicht ermitteln kann. Mir wäre es auch am liebsten, wenn ich die Leistung der Anlage eintragen könnte. Aber dazu fehlen mir die Mittel. Außerdem will ich damit nur die grundsätzliche Erfassung einführen, auch als Anregung für Andere. Da fehlt nämlich noch ganz viel, wäre aber für die Zukunft der Energieversorgung und Planung ganz hilfreich. Ich kann anbieten, daraus ein Punktobjekt zu machen - macht das mehr Sinn?
Viele Grüße
Andreas
Nakaner (2017-10-08 21:51:08+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

ja, Punktobjekte wären tatsächlich vorläufig die sinnvollste Lösung. Ich frage mich gerade auch, warum ich vorher nicht darauf gekommen bin.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Westwind (2017-10-08 21:57:28+00:00): Gut, ich arbeite es die nächsten Tage ein, habe sowieso noch einiges in der Pipeline.
Mappst Du auch Solaranlagen?
Nakaner (2017-10-15 17:02:19+00:00): Nein, ich mappe keine Solaranlagen auf Hausdächern, bloß solche auf Äckern/Wiesen/Unland.
eggie (2017-10-07 08:24:53+00:00): Het is heel simpel. We tekenen niet (meer) zelf in Nederland. Je doet een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import en zet dan deze link erbij. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52696682
Het forum vind je hier. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Zelfde inlog als osm account.... en in no time heb je je gebouw.
Doe je het zelf?
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 11:50:37+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik een update mbt gebouwen verricht.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52705738
S_Emo, mocht je elders nieuwbouw of verbouw weten laat het gerust op het forum weten.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 11:55:50+00:00): Het importeren vanuit de BAG werkt met een speciale tool. Er is een mogelijkheid om te helpen, maar dit is alleen aan ervaren mappers toevertrouwd.
Hier zou je je kunnen inlezen, maar ervaring is echt noodzakelijk.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:BAGimport_via_ODS_plugin
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGupdate
S_Emo (2017-10-08 11:43:43+00:00): Dank je wel Eggie en Commodoortje. :) Ik orienteer me verder, maar heb (nog) geen ambities om zelf vanuit BAG te importeren.... :) Voorlopig eerst ervaring opdoen.
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 10:39:03+00:00): Hi Welcome to Open Street Map. Just a small point: when adding features you need to choose the appropriate tagging, rather than just naming them. The name tag should only be used to add a proper noun. For example, a tennis court should be tagged as leisure=pitch + sport=tennis rather than name=tennis court. I hope you enjoy your mapping,
Mike
dgitto (2017-10-07 12:01:17+00:00): Hi. The node
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26736834
Has a key "aname:sv". Is it maybe a typo for "name:sv" ?
tesp (2017-10-07 15:39:45+00:00): Whoops, that is fixed now. Thanks for the heads-up.
elifz (2017-10-07 03:31:49+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS 2200A
Hjart (2017-10-07 11:22:45+00:00): værdien af brand tags vises ikke på de fleste kort, så det er meget bedre at bruge name=*
elifz (2017-10-07 03:31:30+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
elifz (2017-10-07 03:31:05+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
Vadiм (2019-02-05 11:46:02+00:00): У Вас тут проставлено trolley_wire=no на многих линиях -- в этом есть какой-то смысл?
elifz (2017-10-07 03:30:49+00:00): SOURCE: MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
Glassman (2017-10-07 05:45:18+00:00): The library needs a tag, amenity=library so it is properly categorized. Also - even though the imagery is poor, try to capture the building foot print a best a possible and then square the outline when done. Makes it look much better when rendered.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-10-07 09:59:25+00:00): Please use a more specific comment here. You changeset comments still remain vague, and others will do not know what you are editing.
elifz (2017-10-07 03:30:31+00:00): SOURCE: Mapillary
COMS2200A
mueschel (2017-10-08 13:19:13+00:00): Please be careful where to put tags. This way is definitely not a waste_basket, but some kind of footway. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377683291
elifz (2017-10-07 03:30:04+00:00): Source: Mapillary
COMS2200A
5m4u9 (2017-10-07 03:50:43+00:00): hola, bienvenida/o, gracias por mapear!

los edificios que añadiste en la urbanización estaban mal categorizados "estaban como caserio y no como casa edificio"

igual lo mejoré. cuando dibujes casas trata de abrir el zoom lo más que puedas... asi se hace más preciso y de calidad
elifz (2017-10-07 03:29:40+00:00): Source: Mapillary
COMS2200A
mueschel (2017-10-08 13:16:31+00:00): Please be careful where to put tags. This building is definitely not a "amenity=bench", but a building.
Cheers, Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-20 19:48:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5152873329/history - do you member remember this one? This mosque seems misplaced
elifz (2017-10-07 03:29:17+00:00): Source: Mapillary
COMS2200A
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 19:57:04+00:00): You added a node with just a name of road.  This makes no sense.  I am deleting it.
jptolosa (2017-11-03 03:35:55+00:00): Hola, entiendo que esta es la clasificación usada para las carreteras argentinas, diferente a lo que hiciste: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina/Highways
elifz (2017-10-07 03:28:56+00:00): source: MAPILLARY
COMS2200A
SomeoneElse (2017-12-11 22:29:55+00:00): Hello,
I noticed this cafe called "Unknown" 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5152874523/history while tidying up mapping by some students up north.  It's also removed the name here, but I'll add it back if the name really is called "Unknown" here (as opposed to you just not knowing what the name is).
Best Regards,
Andy
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-10 12:45:35+00:00): This change (and the previous ones collectively) have issues.  Several people have to fix this now.
elifz (2017-10-07 03:34:07+00:00): COMS 2200A
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-08 12:07:50+00:00): Hello christina shadrack. In this and other changesets, you have introduced the new key
`Cabane`.
What is it for? #newkey
christian shadrack (2017-10-08 21:18:09+00:00): Hi Harald ,

Cabane = hut , small house where people can put away some things not usefull or others , or  animals ...
4004 (2017-10-08 19:05:43+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
веломагазин и правда в этой пристройке?
santamariense (2017-10-08 14:43:53+00:00): (Acho que é coisa automática do editor ID, porém não é indicado usar chave, chave_1, chave_2,...). Como em via e via_1 em https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7296785 , ao invés disso, use ";", no caso,  via=Porto Bloss;Taquara
freebeer (2019-01-08 14:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66129851 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle
Jrachi (2024-08-28 08:11:45+00:00): Ciao.
Le località non abitate non possono essere isolated_swelling!
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-10-09 10:22:42+00:00): Ciao,
immagino sia una piscina, direi leisure=swimming_pool
fserges (2017-10-08 18:18:15+00:00): Если в отношение добавляются члены, то им должны присваиваться роли. Член без роли по умолчанию воспринимается как outer. В этом changeset были массово добавлены члены похожие на subarea. В результате попадал целый ряд программ. Добавляя члены в отношения всегда добавляте роли (например outer, inner, subarea, label и т.д.)
woodpeck (2017-10-11 11:57:11+00:00): I have reverted these edits because they violate a DWG resolution regarding the Crimea. Please don't remove Crimea from the Ukraine relation. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52822088
user_6110846 (2017-10-15 08:33:53+00:00): Ваши две правки в Крьіму признаньі вандализмом и отправлено сообщение о том чтовьі вандальничаете в DWG Вьі проекте начинатель а вмешиваетесь без обсуждений и консультаций в правильньіе линии . Также вьі нарушили Договор о Крьіме примиряющий войну редагирований .
sergeybe (2017-12-10 14:34:40+00:00): Ответ от DWG есть?
user_6110846 (2017-12-10 17:57:43+00:00): Любое явное  нарушение Договора о примирении между сообществами откатьІвается автоматически . Также перенесение границьІ в Азовском море бьІло создано без обсуждения на форуме и без указания источников .Сам захотел - сам сделал .  . .Поскольку ВьІ начинатель - Вам надо почаще согласовьІвать свои действия в папке КрьІм и переименования в руской локацие forum.openstreetmap.org НАПОМИНАЮ  Крым територия конфликтная между 2-умя сооществами . Здесь много нюансов .
sergeybe (2017-12-10 18:00:38+00:00): Я вам конкретный вопрос задал. Был ответ от DWG или нет?
user_6110846 (2017-12-10 18:15:08+00:00): с ДВГ на мон ответа ответа не было .Но сделана им вторая правка была откатана Вудспеком с ДВГ От вудспека он уведомление получил . 
Эту правку я откатил потом у   была игра с тегом disputed / Нигде обсуждения не было .Тем более чт о територия Коняфликтная . И во вторых ето перенесение  границы русской в Азовском море без форума без указания источников . 

К примеру я показал смещение границы old wolf  с России с рейтингом 9000 . Он не дал никаког оответа .Такая правка должна обсуждатся ти при обсуждении должны быть руководство России.   .
sergeybe (2017-12-10 19:09:59+00:00): Теперь понятно. В следующий раз пожалуйста пишите так: "Ваши правки в Крьіму _я_ признанал вандализмом". И пожалуйста не пугайте начинающих пользователей буквами DWG. Надо как-то добрее к ним относиться.
Еще чтобы не было лишних вопросов, пожалуйста пишите в комментариях номера ченджсетов в которых вы откатили правки.
Supaplex (2018-01-20 00:34:33+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck (2017-10-22 19:30:51+00:00): Hello lorec10, please do not add "proposed" boundaries to OSM. They are nearly impossible to verify, they make editing more difficult for everyone who touches one of the members of the relation, and they are of little use. In this particular case, you also fail to explain who is proposing this and what your sources are, but even if you were to add that information, proposed boundaries are not usually something we keep in OSM.
joost schouppe (2018-08-28 14:20:34+00:00): Since the mapper didn't reply to two other changeset comments either, and it is clearly not a real boundary, I have deleted this in changeset 62073000
mavl (2017-10-07 09:13:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47694801, 47695092, 47730155, 47730346, 47730937, 47731562, 47732079, 47733512, 47733543, 47734844, 47735479, 47738445, 47738663, 47903308, 47903830, 47904713, 47904753, 47905040, 47905177, 47905206, 47906166, 47906590, 47935095, 47935306, 47935676, 47935773, 47935968, 47936003, 47937095, 47937237, 47937311, 47937605, 47937786, 47937838, 47938087, 47938146, 47938182, 47938240, 47938487, 47938682, 47938724, 47938866, 47938963, 47939599, 47939627, 47939766, 47967533, 47967576, 47967651, 47967734, 47967813, 47968388, 47969016, 47969095.
Carnildo (2017-10-10 16:46:30+00:00): I noticed you used the Bing imagery for this changeset.  When you're editing in Spokane County, the ESRI imagery is *far* sharper than Bing, and usually better-aligned.
SOSM (2017-10-08 13:50:28+00:00): Hoi psywolf85 und willkommen bei OSM

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfirepit passt IMHO besser zu was man klassisch in Schweizer Wäldern findet (oder einer der piknick varianten).

Gruss
psywolf85 (2017-10-09 05:41:30+00:00): Hallo :) Alles klar, ich habe es entsprechend abgeändert.
ClarkstonCorrect (2017-10-08 01:09:54+00:00): in case you are wondering what i did, i was going to add ailsa craig because my internet had been slow and lagging me out but its already there lol
geri-oc (2017-11-13 19:08:44+00:00): Biite einmal die Schlüssel für das Mappen beachten: Biotop -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Naturschutzgebiete

nur eine Linie mit name=* erzeugt Fehlermeldung: https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=101&error=89093397

Gruß Gerd
will_p (2017-10-07 12:59:30+00:00): Hi, 
Could you just confirm that you have walked along the entire length of this path? It is several years since I have attempted to walk this route, but I remember that starting at the eastern end, the path was completely blocked by a high hedge and barbed wire fences when it reached the boundary of the house next to Old Workhouse Farm. I believe the official right of way is a dead end that stops at the property boundary. Is it now possible to get through?

Thanks,
Will
AndrewDJohnson (2017-10-07 13:09:52+00:00): Hi Will,

Thanks for the feedback. Actually, I was simply going by the sign that was there, on the road/track going down to Nottingham road and what was on the OS Map  - so it could well be that the path is still blocked in the manner you describe. Hence, you can delete the edits. If I go back there, I will try to check and confirm any changes!
will_p (2017-10-07 15:53:11+00:00): Thanks for the quick response. These paths are confusing and I'm sure many people have followed them wrongly assuming that they join up. 

I have updated your edit: I have left the section of path I remember walking along in place, but have removed the section around Moor Cottages/Old Workhouse Farm which I suspect doesn't exist.

Please keep in mind that OS maps are copyright and are not a suitable source for contributing to OSM. You can see the rights of way on this site: http://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=Trowell%20Moor&map=OSM&lat=52.9571&lon=1.25699&lonew=W
AndrewDJohnson (2017-10-07 21:45:44+00:00): Thanks for the info!
majid1359 (2017-10-07 08:58:24+00:00): مکان داروخانه اشتباه بود پاک شد
Hjart (2017-10-07 11:54:49+00:00): Undgå venligst at rykke ved adresser (adskillige stk i Staby & vest for Ulfborg)
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 09:35:41+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 09:39:17+00:00): Goed bezig.
Probeer de schrijfwijze te hanteren.
Een naam begint meestal met een hoofdletter.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 09:45:04+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik de hoofdletters aangepast.
De naam van de sportschool heb ik verwijderd. Als deze een naam heeft kun je deze zelf aanpassen. 
Maar hij zal niet "sportschool" heten.
Polarbear-repair (2017-10-27 13:13:00+00:00): Hi Shogun, für Pflegeheime solltest du bitte verwenden:
amenity = social_facility
social_facility = nursing_home

Sollte dein JOSM auch als Preset unterstützen.
mavl (2017-10-07 11:03:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47539639, 47539897, 47540401, 47617431, 47617973, 47618765, 47619154, 47619667, 47620257, 47652287, 47652340, 47652363, 47652512, 47652598, 47655050, 47655830, 47656207, 47656983, 47657418, 47658057, 47690995, 47691019, 47691135, 47691187, 47691443, 47691470, 47691562, 47692406, 47692435, 47692646, 47692736, 47693160, 47693561.
user_5359 (2017-10-07 11:06:16+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hast Du die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1646120 bemerkt? Ich vermute Dein Punkt ist ein doppelter Eintrag.
inkeye (2017-10-08 23:23:14+00:00): Danke! Sorry, habe ich übersehen. Kann wieder gelöscht werden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-24 22:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53221630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional names in Singapore and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1601
freebeer (2018-05-31 01:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59413749 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal private info inappropriate spammage
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-10-07 15:41:19+00:00): I undid your edit as the name is no longer current. And please, use more specific comments on your next edits. I told you about that already many time already.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-08 11:58:55+00:00): Hallo NiCoVo. Willkommen bei OSM.
Erste Frage: was hat dein Änderungskommentar mit einem Trinkbrunnen zu tun? ;-)
Zweitens: Ein Trinkbrunnen wird als
`amenity=drinking_water` getaggt, siehe
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
NiCoVo (2017-10-08 12:10:03+00:00): Sorry, da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. Danke für die Info!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-24 22:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53221630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional names in Singapore and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1601
gileri (2017-10-16 20:50:49+00:00): Bonjour,

D'abord bravo pour avoir mappé les étendues de gazon sur le campus, ça permet de donner justice aux aménagements et change du gris de fond habituel :)

Je pense qu'il serait préférable de découper le multipolygone en plus petits ensembles, vu que des pelouses à plus de 500m n'ont pas vraiment de rapport entre-elles à part que ce sont des pelouses.

Aussi les commentaires sur la relation font sourire, mais je pense qu'il serait mieux en message de changeset ou dans les discussions de changesets
ElementW (2017-10-22 15:57:43+00:00): @gileri: pour la séparation en différents multiplygones j'y ai pensé, car là j'arrive à plusieurs centaines de membres, ça fait beaucoup. Quant au message, je compte l'enlever au prochain batch d'herbe que j'enverrai.
gileri (2017-10-23 18:53:40+00:00): Parfait !
ElementW (2017-10-23 18:55:51+00:00): cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53157198
AlaskaDave (2018-10-12 07:02:21+00:00): I'm mapping in the area of Fox, Alaska, and have come across some of your work. Thanks for your effort in Alaska but I am curious about how you draw your lakes and streams. It seems to me that many objects you've drawn use far too many points. A small pond with a 3 mile long shoreline contains 846 points (id:530770840) and a 6 mile long section of Goldstream Creek (id:530770823) contains 1407. It seems a waste of space to store all these points to represent such simple objects. I simplified the way defining the pond and 179 points shows it well enough IMO. (I did not upload the simplified way. I undid my changes.).
So how do you do it? And why do you use so many points?
Respectfully,
Dave
Hjart (2017-10-07 11:03:53+00:00): tagging it motor_vehicle=no is simpler and makes a bit more sense
mueschel (2017-10-11 09:44:51+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "bushwood=yes" here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530779340
This tag is new. Maybe natural=wood?
Jan
fkv (2018-04-03 21:55:40+00:00): Da (im Rührsdorfer Graben) ist eine Höhle? Wie groß ist die?
Hjart (2017-10-07 11:15:33+00:00): I'm quite familiar with this bit. Motor vehicles actually are allowed, but only from Posthus to Torvet. Somehow the OSM oneway got pointed the wrong way (and I'm sorry about that), but irrespective of that you always should respect physical signs: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/O5yHIrI6wYNmsUnbjX71dw
Constable (2017-10-08 07:28:18+00:00): Ciao, per favore prima di salvare le modifiche inserisci un breve commento delle tue modifiche, in modo da consentire anche agli altri mappatori della tua zona di capire al volo cosa hai modificato.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Grazie, ciao
mueschel (2017-10-11 09:48:09+00:00): Hi,
you added several areas with only foreign tags and no common OSM tags. E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530774417
The actual suburb is already existing in OSM and mapped properly.

Jan
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-15 10:02:57+00:00): Please have a look at the already existing data!
You added the boundary of Yedikule again and again. But there is already one with right tagging: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7648813
Also please reuse the already existing nodes with the same position. This changesets looks like automatically imports.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52950943
Cascafico (2017-10-07 13:20:48+00:00): Il lago sembra già mappato.
literan (2017-10-07 11:18:55+00:00): здравствуйте. Прошу вас не ставить на обычные полигоны теги мультиполигонов (type=multipolygon), как здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530775599/history#map=19/55.78284/37.51456 Я поправлю.
Uterouter (2017-10-07 17:54:07+00:00): Добрый день. Сделано по подобию ближайшей зоны. Буквально в 50 м в сторону Полежаевской.
literan (2017-10-09 11:31:52+00:00): Так там же мультиполигон!! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4136470 а вы ставите этот тег на обычный полигон. Вы читали вики про базовые отличия между четырьмя основными объектами в OSM - точка, линия, полигон, мультиполигон?
luschi (2019-02-17 01:05:02+00:00): Hi,      
in the Italian forum is posted a error made from you by addin all these "Unione dei comuni" with the admin_level=7.      
Can you please help out to fix this: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65384
Alecs01 (2019-02-18 19:39:15+00:00): Hi luschi, this particular area does not overlap with any other admin_level=7 relation: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Gea Btw, I wouldn't call it a mistake. At least, both "Unione di Comuni" and "Comunità montana" are tagged the same way to date (as an intermediate entity between Comune and Provincia, that is, admin_level=7), see http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/problemi-admin-7-a-Valese-td5933123.html
gazember8 (2017-10-07 12:11:57+00:00): • Aj v tomto changesete si celý objekt označil ako [building=yes], aj keď to budovou nie je, prosím, oprav túto chybu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530779501
dbaron (2018-04-27 23:11:36+00:00): This changeset appears to have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56632490
gazember8 (2017-10-07 22:13:23+00:00): • Aj v tomto prípade si celý objekt označil ako [building=yes], aj keď to budovou nie je, prosím, oprav túto chybu. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530779951