piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2017-04-01 23:27:27+00:00): The gate you added .. with closing at 4 pm (16:00 hours) .. when does it open????
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:20:33+00:00): Co to za Trzy Krzyże?
Brian@Brea (2015-06-28 07:52:28+00:00): Please remember that all edits being made are visible to the public. Also please insure that all information is up to date. Like website, attraction names, and Wikipedia article names.
Brian@Brea (2015-06-28 07:50:48+00:00): So why is the deletion of attractions are occurring in this area? None of the attractions in the area have closed. The only thing that has been announced that theater construction on the north side of Rock'n' Rollercoaster.
Brian@Brea (2015-06-28 07:50:19+00:00): So why is the deletion of attractions are occurring in this area? None of the attractions in the area have closed. The only thing that has been announced that theater construction on the north side of Rock'n' Rollercoaster.
beatrice jones (2015-09-12 15:37:11+00:00): Which hasn't progressed, since Disney Imagineering are idiots.
Geography Canada (2016-07-06 22:20:32+00:00): Fix please.
edward17 (2015-06-27 20:09:31+00:00): Пожалуйста, отмечай детские сады тегом amenity=kindergarten.
rene78 (2015-06-28 10:20:23+00:00): Hallo h@llo ;)

willkommen bei OSM! Kurze Info: Der Tag "name" ist in erster Linie für Strassen, Geschäftsnamen, etc. Bei Wohnhäuser wird er normalerweise nicht benutzt (ausser vielleicht in UK, wo Häuser Namen haben).

Ciao
René
h@llo (2015-06-28 12:04:44+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die Namen entfernt.
Gruss h@llo
Dusche (2015-06-30 09:08:28+00:00): Hey beweta,

would it be possible to add a few words on where you changed anything if you have these wide range edits? That would be great. Another possibility could be to split those changesets into smaller, local ones.
Dusche
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-12 12:06:43+00:00): I have to agree with Dusche here.  Smaller changesets that don't span the ocean would be greatly appreciated.  Especially when you're trying to see if there any changes done in your local area.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-09-30 13:00:34+00:00): Ciao. I numeri civici vanno indicati sull'accesso e non sull'area. Pertanto, puoi posizionare il civici sull'accesso (porta, cancello, ecc). Grazie. Andrea
RoniOyardo (2015-06-27 15:19:17+00:00): Añadiendo el Ministerio de Comunicación
Brandon_eh (2015-06-27 16:06:51+00:00): Forgot to leave changeset comment - changed names of two buildings in Guelph to reflect current use. Also added details for 7 Highway (Victoria/Woodlawn)
SK53 (2015-06-29 13:53:09+00:00): Damn too busy to make this edit myself!
Brandon_eh (2015-06-27 16:25:45+00:00): Forgot change comments. Changed name of hotel to current name; Target to vacant; added Waterloo North Hydro local transmission station in.
mavl (2015-06-28 16:48:48+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Сожалею, что вынужден беспокоить вас.
Можно узнать, где написано, что разъезд Тарманский переименован в станцию Тюмень-северная?

http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=164424;frame=8719
mavl (2015-06-28 16:58:41+00:00): Hello.
Why the station Тарманский is renamed into station Тюмень-северная?
filu (2015-06-28 19:05:18+00:00): Vot pazhaulsta :-)

http://pass.rzd.ru/tablo/public/ru?STRUCTURE_ID=704&layer_id=5404&day=30-06-2015&id=785911&node_id=19

https://rasp.yandex.ru/station/9633849?span=g14&amp;type=suburban

http://3ty.ru/rasp/0792572.html

But ok, I add alt_name=Тарманский, switch if needed.
mavl (2015-06-30 01:23:07+00:00): Hello. Thank you.

Your link http://pass.rzd.ru/tablo/public/ru?STRUCTURE_ID=704&layer_id=5404&day=30-06-2015&id=785911&node_id=19

There are lines

ТЮМЕНЬ-СЕВЕРНАЯ	17:21	31 мин	17:22  
ТУРИНСКИЙ	17:34	44 мин  

Тюмень-северая it is one station, Туринский - other station.

In Russia there is an official qualifier of railway stations (ESR):

http://osm.sbin.ru/esr/region:tumen:l
http://cargo.rzd.ru/cargostation/public/ru?STRUCTURE_ID=5101&layer_id=4821&name=%D0%A2%D1%8E%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C-%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F&code=&region_name=&commerc_oper_id=&join_type_id=&action=filtr&x=0&y=0

Code ESR:	790431 (Тюмень-Северная)  
Code ESR:	795609 (Туринский)
filu (2015-06-30 07:22:05+00:00): Yes, I agree but we discuss Тюмень-северная / Тарманский, not Туринский !!
Туринский is here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/310264642#map=15/57.1744/65.8715
mavl (2015-06-30 07:57:32+00:00): I'm sorry. It is my mistake (early morning). Of course Тарманский.
But then:
ESR code 790412 Тарманский  
ESR code 790431 Тюмень-Северная  

We discuss this problem with other OSM contributors from the Tyumen Oblast.
I think, that Тарманский was in a correct place. I suspect, where is Тюмень-Северная, but I need to visit that place. Maybe, at this station there is a pointer with a name.
filu (2015-06-30 08:30:11+00:00): Ok I'm sorry then. I've just seen that no pass/elektr trains stop at Tarmanskij and they do stop at Tyumen Severnaja so (as bing shows only one station there) I've just assumed that it has been renamed. Once again sorry for the mess.
mavl (2015-07-03 17:53:14+00:00): Hello. Our contributor has visited station and has found out, that Тарманский is renamed in Тюмень-Северная. You was right.
simon04 (2016-12-31 11:22:20+00:00): »Die Ticketautomaten sind sehr oft doppelt eingezeichnet.«, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/831395
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
tyr_asd (2015-06-27 16:42:30+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/387121
zarl (2015-10-25 12:32:09+00:00): Statt hier etliche Elemente im POI wie entrance etc. zu löschen (und damit den Node als fehlerhaftes Etwas zurück zu lassen), sollte man bei shop einfach ein disused: davor stellen, wenn der Laden auf Dauer geschlossen hat, aber etwas Neues rein kommen könnte, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:

Gruss,
Zarl
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
kreuzschnabel (2019-02-06 09:39:47+00:00): Nette Idee mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75732199, aber natural=scree ist ein Geröllfeld im Gebirge aus abgebröckeltem Gestein. Mit dem LKW will man da nicht drauf fahren. Ich nehme an, eine gekieste oder gefeinschotterte Oberfläche ist gemeint? Dann surface=gravel / fine_gravel. Auch wenn’s in osm-carto dann nicht so schön aussieht :)
Nakaner (2015-11-20 11:29:19+00:00): Eine Änderung in diesem Änderungssatz wird von User mathijsen angezweifelt. Könntest du bitte dazu Stellung nehmen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/275655
öreg (2015-11-20 16:35:40+00:00): Ich habe bereits mathijsen geschriebben.
öreg
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-10-15 09:41:31+00:00): Hi. I've added a `theme=irish` to “Saints & Sinners”. I also changed the `cuisine` to `pub`, rather than `Irish pub`.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75709357
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-27 22:59:59+00:00): Dzień dobry. Chciałbym się upewnić, że znasz zasady tagowania adresów w OSM.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-27 23:08:12+00:00): Chodzi mi przykładowo o ten adres: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3622386605
Co to jest Kolonia Szychów? Jest to część miejscowości Stara Łomnica? Czy posiada ona własną numerację? Próbowałem znaleźć jakieś odniesienie w TERYT, ale tam nigdzie nie widzę ani Kolonii Szychów, ani samego Szychowa.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-10 11:12:06+00:00): A dlaczego dodałeś junction=roundabout do tego ronda? Tylko dlatego, że stoi tam znak?
AdamoSk (2015-07-10 13:03:11+00:00): Z tego co czytałem to przy rondach powinien być taki tag.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-10 13:52:32+00:00): Nie wszystko złoto co się świeci ;-)
Nie wszystko, co posiada znak ronda powinno mieć dodane tag junction.
AdamoSk (2015-07-10 16:04:00+00:00): A kiedy nie używa się rounabout?
Jak nie było tego tag'a to Yanosik miał tutaj  dziwne wskazówki nawigacyjne, tak samo było na rondzie Grzegórzeckim.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-10 22:47:07+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=515179#p515179 - drugi akapit.
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:43:45+00:00): Bairro Sion, Sion, Bairro São Sebastião. Não deve ter um regra ou norma por nomenclatura desses lugares? Geralmente deixamos fore o "Bairro" dos nomes, mesmo nas bairros.
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:22:18+00:00): Voce pode usar o etiqueta crop=* para denomenar que tipo do produção ha na esse terra, por exemplo crop=caffee
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-27 22:04:49+00:00): To jest rondeczko czy nie jest? :-)
Madmaks (2015-06-28 00:24:50+00:00): Jest :) Byłem i widziałem, ponadto widoczne na podkładach Bing :)
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-28 00:29:04+00:00): Źle sformułowałem pytanie - powinno mieć junction=roundabout? :-)
Madmaks (2015-06-28 00:34:09+00:00): Touché! Już poprawiłem :)
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:15:59+00:00): Não devemos coloque o função no nome (name=Posto de Combustível), melhor e coloque o função com o etiqueta certa (amenity=fuel), também se voce fiz levantamento no local pode coloque a bandeira do posto no etiqueta brand (brand=Petrobras, brand=Shell....), também um posto gasolina geralmente não e um edifício, mas em baixo do um tecto (building=roof)
GerdP (2019-04-05 08:48:04+00:00): Moin!
Ist etwas spät, aber mir ist hier der Weg nur mit embankment=yes aufgefallen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290685861#map=17/53.06101/8.81768
War das Absicht? Das Tag sollte doch eigentlich an die entsprechenden highway=* auf dem Damm, oder?
GerdP (2015-11-05 10:12:55+00:00): please review:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35098246
pnorman (2015-07-21 00:48:10+00:00): You've indicated Google is the source for this as well as another changeset. Unfortunately, Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products. Did you use Google as a source for any other changes?

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
ingcelsi (2015-08-12 10:22:19+00:00): I state the address of Google Maps only to allow quick viewing the aerial photo on those who might have interest. It's actually a place I know in person. And then for the changes use JOSM with aerial background of the National Geoportal.
Giuseppe Celsi
naoliv (2015-06-28 04:49:02+00:00): Clébison, porque você está alterando a classificação dessa http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334964699 e de outras ruas próximas? Não está certo o modo como você deixou (e já é a segunda vez que você altera).
Estradas de terra não devem ser classificadas como track
Skippern (2015-06-28 23:13:50+00:00): Alterações desse tipo e um dos motivos porque roteamento nas mapas Brasileiros sempre e complicado ou quebrado.
Skippern (2015-06-29 00:16:42+00:00): O "Rua Ray Wesley Herrick" tem ref=SCA-442, significando que e um estrada municipal, alem do ser unico rua conetando o Bairro Jardim Vista Alegre ao mundo. Esse estrada obviamente e pelo menus highway=unclassified, e provavelmente highway=tertiary, eu corrigiu esse classificação ha 4 dias, e de novo agora. Se ha duvida sobre como classificar as rodovias, pergunta o comunidade, temos motivos para classifica-los como e.
Clébison (2015-06-29 02:37:12+00:00): Olá naoliv e Skippern, peço perdão pelos erros. Sou novo aqui e minha intenção não é nada mais do que contribuir positivamente com o OpenStreetMap. Minhas últimas edições nesta área foram com o editor iD. A última, mais recente, foi usando o Potlatch 2. Moro nessa região e classifiquei essas estradas olhando os ícones que apareciam na classificação. Como são estradas de terra e no desenho aparecia uma estradinha marrom, achei que seria o correto. Quero aprender mais sobre mapeamento e ajudar muito mais. Sobre a nomeação das ruas, estou me baseando no mapa oficial disponibilizado no site da cidade. Mais uma vez, desculpe pelos erros. Podem consertar o que quiserem. Não vou mais mexer nessa área.
smaprs (2015-08-30 12:41:38+00:00): Olá. Bem-vindas suas contribuições. Você pode encontrar mais informações sobre uso de comments para changesets em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments e http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:22:58+00:00): Igreja deve ter religion=christian junto com amenity=place_of_worship
Geomarca - Engenharia&Topografia (2015-06-28 22:33:47+00:00): Ok Skippern, agradeço suas correções, estou aprendendo com vc.
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:25:15+00:00): Deve ter um ponte onde a estrada cruzam o córrego, ou se o córrego vai em baixo do terra (coberto) com tunnel=culvert, lembro usar o etiqueta layer=* junto com bridge=* ou tunnel=*
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:26:21+00:00): Isso deve ser waterway=stream + tunnel=culvert + layer=-1 em vez de man_made=pipeline
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:26:54+00:00): Aqui também
Skippern (2015-06-28 22:27:53+00:00): Nome desse realmente e "Almoxarifado"? Talvez deve ser utilizado etiquetas diferente. Também acho melhor com building=warehouse
naoliv (2015-12-09 22:47:40+00:00): Sebastian, não se deve colocar nomes descritivos nos locais.
Por exemplo, "bosque" e "floresta" não são os nomes que estas áreas possuem.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
renesigma (2015-07-01 15:29:03+00:00): El polígono que define un área debe abarcar el área completa, no solo el perímetro del área. Si tienes problemas con el renderizado de grandes polígonos de algún software o dispositivo favor contátame.


The polygon defining an area should cover the entire area, not just the perimeter of the area. If you have problems with the rendering of large polygons of any software or device please contact me.
emergency99 (2015-06-28 11:00:47+00:00): Thanks for fixing... I already thought, that this can't be right, how I put it in... Should I change it in the Wiki?
Kevin Kofler (2015-06-28 20:33:53+00:00): Yes, please.
R0bst3r (2015-11-16 14:13:06+00:00): Can you please review tags of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5325184? Thanks!
ChristopherMGRF (2015-06-29 01:03:58+00:00): Maaf Di Lapangan Namanya Memang m. Yazin tapi di referensi M. Yasin, saya juga sempat bingung.. Mungkin kesalahan saat input referensi..
ivanbranco (2021-12-24 11:29:56+00:00): Hi Rodarte!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3622777097

can you check out this place value please?
ftrebien (2016-02-22 23:50:12+00:00): Você sabe onde se pode conseguir o plano diretor de Viamão com os anexos?
smaprs (2016-02-23 02:27:40+00:00): Telefonei para a prefeitura de Viamão e me enviaram os PDFs por por email
smaprs (2016-02-23 02:28:33+00:00): Departamento de Projetos: 3492.7619
Departamento de Habitação: 3492.7679
ftrebien (2016-02-23 19:24:32+00:00): Que interessante. Quando liguei pra eles, disseram que só entregavam se buscasse presencialmente numa pendrive. Vou adicionar esses documentos aos planos diretores que eu estou acumulando pra compartilhar com a comunidade. Se você tiver outros planos diretores, por favor me avise, daí coloco tudo junto.
ftrebien (2017-12-18 13:26:53+00:00): Vou adicionar um fixme a esses elementos porque dizem respeito a um projeto de lei que ainda não foi aprovada e que pode sofrer alterações.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-08 18:40:26+00:00): Trying to work out why any part of US 26 remotely qualifies as a trunk, which would generally be typified by a limited access route; in this case, the Ross Island Bridge really should be primary and connected by a series of primary_link to anything that isn't a ramp directly attached to Naito Parkway, which would obviously be trunk_link.

Let's try to avoid priority creep on the highway=* tag, it's almost never justified but does greatly complicate things for routers and mappers.
Bickendan (2015-07-08 20:53:34+00:00): Considering the Ross Island Bridge has the highest non-freeway speed limit crossing the Willamette and has interchanges on both sides of the river (OR 99E on the eastside, OR 10, 43, 99W and [indirectly] I-5 on the westside), it does make sense to flag the bridge and its approaches as a trunk instead of primary. Beyond the foot of the bridge in Southeast Portland, where the speed limit drops from 40 to 35 MPH, the argument for marking it as trunk does become tenuous. 

While historical notes may be irrelevant for OSM's general purposes, when Robert Moses published his recommendations to Portland for its urban renovation in 1943 in "Portland Improvement", he advocated the use of the Ross Island Bridge as part of the freeway loop around downtown (the construction of the Marquam Bridge mitigated this need).
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-09 14:02:47+00:00): First part makes a compelling case for a trunk between 99W and 99E, with the cutoff being, either Milwaukie or 21st.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-11 21:21:26+00:00): Well, if we're going to have US 26 east of Naito and west of East 2x as trunk, might as well make the links match.
Grant Humphries (2015-07-21 01:14:25+00:00): What's your thought process in switching way 160254307 from 'motorway_link' to 'motorway'?
Bickendan (2015-07-21 01:38:47+00:00): This ramp is defined by ODOT as the I-84/US 30 mainline (http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TDATA/rics/docs/NumRouteMap_enl.pdf), and it's noted in the Thomas Guide maps as such.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-21 04:46:45+00:00): We use a functional classification, not necessarily what DOT calls it, though.  I think most people would call this a ramp.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-21 05:10:01+00:00): OpenStreetMap uses a functional classification, which doesn't always jibe with what the DOT thinks.  I wouldn't assume the connectors that terminate the west end of the Banfield Freeway to be the mainline of anything whatsoever, Banfield ends there; the mainline would be the Eastbank Freeway at this location.
Bickendan (2015-07-21 05:18:10+00:00): It's also striving for a consistency with how the Thomas Guide depicted the interchanges, which marked the US 30 mainlines through the interchanges with I-405, I-5/405 and I-5/I-84 as mainline freeway because the US 30 shield wouldn't appear on each consecutive segment as it transferred freeways. I use Thomas Bros Mapping as the example as it was the offline standard along the west coast until Rand McNally finally shut down the Thomas Guide/Street Guide division. 
Secondary argument: Previously, on the MapQuest layer, the terminating freeways  (US 30 at I-405, I-405 at I-5, I-84 at I-5) would have a gap between the end of the mainline ways and the cross-route at the regional scales, falsely implying an incomplete route. By marking these particular ramps as mainline, the interchanges were shown to connect when the MapQuest layer caught up with the edits.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-21 05:35:02+00:00): I believe this actually gives your argument even *less* basis, mostly because that implicitly suggests intentionally attempting to duplicate Thomas Guide and MapQuest.  We're not trying to map other maps, we're not trying to tag for the renderers, we're trying to map what's actually out there.  Just because a route crosses a motorway_link doesn't mean that it's not mainline, just means at some point the route takes a ramp.  BFD, highway routes do this commonly.  The route's already covered by relations (presumably, at least last time I actually loaded the data closely at this interchange), so tagging for the ground truth would have no bearing on what the route implies: They're two totally different entities to start  with.
Grant Humphries (2015-07-21 19:04:12+00:00): I can see the logic behind both cases that are being made, and I don't have a strong opinion either way.  However, way: 23629712 is still tagged as motorway_link and should match whatever the consensus is arrived at for the tagging of 356882078 and 160254307.  That's what originally drew my attention to this was that the former the latter segments had different classifications, but have essentially the same characteristics
Bickendan (2015-07-21 19:26:23+00:00): Thanks for that catch. Until a formal decision is made, I've set that final way to motorway to match the rest of the US 30 ways through the interchange.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-21 20:49:31+00:00): Considering that the ramps from the Eastbank Freeway to mile 0 of the Banfield Freeway were motorway_link for at least several years before, I'm curious if there are any arguments stronger than "some copyrighted map shows it different".
radmar (2015-06-28 20:16:45+00:00): Dane zostały usunięte z uwagi na brak kontaktu i podania źródła danych z których korzysta użytkownik. Prawdopodobnie korzysta on z warstwy topo na geoportalu, w dodatku mapując wszystkie granice oddziału jako tracki, pomimo iż sporo z nich nie jest drogą w terenie.
radmar (2015-06-28 20:17:30+00:00): Dane zostały usunięte z uwagi na brak kontaktu i podania źródła danych z których korzysta użytkownik. Prawdopodobnie korzysta on z warstwy topo na geoportalu, w dodatku mapując wszystkie granice oddziału leśnego jako tracki, pomimo iż sporo z nich nie jest drogą w terenie.
Lytter1 (2015-09-24 15:41:52+00:00): Den her er interessant: "slurry_tank", jeg synes ikke jeg kan finde noget om det på Wiki. Kan du bekræfte om man kan bruge denne betegnelse for gylletank?
Hjart (2015-09-24 15:47:55+00:00): Det er min opfindelse :-). Jeg har endnu ikke dokumenteret den (på wikien), men der er ikke noget i vejen for alligevel at bruge den. Jeg har set en del andre måder at tagge gylletanke, men jeg synes denne er langt den bedste :-)
SomeoneElse (2015-09-20 11:05:31+00:00): Any reason why you changed the tags in http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/285872/history rather than just deleting it?  It makes what you did look very much like an undiscussed mechanical edit :)
Of course I do think that it's fair to assume that "bicycle=lcn" means the same as "network=rcn", so it does make the sense to make the change, but it also helps to look for other problems that might be in the data at the same time.  If in doubt, contact the original mappers.
mstriewe (2015-09-20 11:27:12+00:00): Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. In http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/285872/history I did indeed delete a tag and not change one, as far as I can see and remember.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-20 12:13:55+00:00): You did delete rather than change the tag, but the relation itself is a left-over duplicate with no members.  Using http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/285872/history you can see that it has no members now and that former members are now part of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/338852 .
mstriewe (2015-09-20 13:12:30+00:00): Ah, now I understand what you mean. Yes, looks as if the relation is not used anymore. I just asked the original mapper whether it could be deleted. Thanks for spotting.
joost schouppe (2015-07-01 12:38:10+00:00): Je spreekt van een one-way straat, maar ik zie nergens oneway=yes op een stuk van de botestraat.
sh9000be (2015-07-01 14:31:34+00:00): Parking Neptunus is vorige week hertekend. Men moet nu verplicht over de parking, deel Botestraat is enkel nog om terug weg te rijden. Ik had dit zo ingegeven, maar bij deze dus tenietgedaan.