piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChrissW-R1 (2015-11-18 13:09:34+00:00): In this case you are right. I was to fast and didn't see the tag "ref:name", on which the changed tag references to. So I reverted it in changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35404804.

But you are wrong, if you think that I only take mechanical changes. I know the rules of these automated edits. I used the taginfo tools to find anomalies in the data. In many other changesets of me, you could see, that the keepright and other tools were used to verify the changes.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-18 13:20:10+00:00): Any change is "mechanical" if it doesn't take into account the meaning of the underlying data - if you don't think about how the change that you are making relates to the real world.  

It's pretty clear here and also in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932460 that you haven't given any thought to any such meaning, and it's therefore a "mechanical" change.
Stereo (2015-10-28 21:42:44+00:00): Hi Dan! Is that from a survey already?
wilda69 (2015-10-29 15:23:57+00:00): Hi Gerard,
I was there on Monday, but it was not open yet and could not get very close. However newspaper photo suggest that the road goes parallel until the tunnel starts. Not as shown. I will investigate this on Sunday
wilda69 (2015-11-01 11:58:30+00:00): Hi Guillaume,
I did a lot of plotting this morning (despite the fog), and there are some major changes in the area. Used a camera in my car to help with clues for the tunnel, and just as well as the GPS lost signal for a while. My track can be seen on OSM.

1) there is a completely new temporary feed off the motorway to the Kirchberg P&R (which has been made smaller). At certain stages it has three lanes (for bus and turns) but have not bothered with these.
2) The motorway link into the Serra tunnel starts at Rue J Hackin, but oddly enough has no signs that it leads to the A4 to Luxembourg. Also the old busroute & cycleparth  paralel stop at the entrance of the Paribas carpark and is broken up from there on.  
3) The Tunnel entrance is at the end of new new Paribas construction, then makes a fairly sharp R turn and snakes L & R to where it ends and joins the feed from the Serra rondpoint.  That exit point seems to have already been correctly plotted (possibly yourself?)
4) I have plotted building=construction for the new Paribas but it is a fixme as did not work out its actual dimensions.

So, hopefully it will encourage others to tweek all those major changes.
Cheers,
Dan
Tomas_J (2026-05-31 07:40:47+00:00): Cus, popisy (cesta pro vodaky - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377358252) nepatri do name.
maraf24 (2015-10-30 09:23:36+00:00): Proszę nie poprawiać w ten sposób obrysów budynków.
Nie rysujemy wg położenia dachu.
Ravinder Dahiya (2015-10-28 20:30:49+00:00): Added newly built Road
Ravinder Dahiya (2015-10-28 20:30:00+00:00): Linked street to Bhatu Road.
Doug Lutz (2024-06-24 17:03:26+00:00): The labels on this track are wrong.  “Porcupine Tower” is the pinnacle beside the currently marked “Porcupine Ridge”, and the high point on this ridge before ascending higher to “Crown West”, would be considered “Porcupine Ridge”… the current place marked as “Porcupine Tower”.

Providing the incorrect information is causing confusion, because when someone says they climbed “Porcupine Tower”, and the pictures show this benign ridge compared to the real Porcupine Tower, the viewing person says WTF??
brendan714 (2024-06-24 18:08:09+00:00): No they're not, I literally named these.  What I called Porcupine Tower is shown in the correct location.
Doug Lutz (2024-06-24 19:16:19+00:00): Thanks for replying so quickly Brendan, correcting my understanding.  My apologies!
canfe (2024-01-28 07:19:09+00:00): Hai fatto molti indirizzi a Piaanezza ma li hai assegnati ai buildings invece che creare il nodo separato. Li potresti correggere? Ti posso aiutare.
Alecs01 (2015-10-28 21:57:35+00:00): Ciao Mauro, benvenuto su OSM! bella l'iniziativa degli alberi, credo però che per indicare la specie il tag più indicato non sia name=* ma species=* (e species:it=* per il nome italiano), vedi qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree e qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species  Buon mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 11:25:59+00:00): Hi, just spotted you'd updated http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105352110 - did you perhaps forget to update the source?  There are certainly more trees there than there were before (though perhaps not quite as many as mapped).  Should perhaps "Bing" be listed as one of the sources?
Also - did you happen to notice if the new car park access road (across the road) was open yet?
Nigel Greens (2015-11-07 13:03:39+00:00): Yes, the source for the shape of the wood was Bing. I'll add that as a source. I've been past recently, which is what prompted me to map this area, but I couldn't say about the new access road. Another thing to watch for next time.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 14:49:54+00:00): Thanks.  I use that car park fairly regularly during the winter, so should get a chance to check.
user_6110846 (2017-10-10 05:07:18+00:00): згідно правил (традицій )польської картографії на мапах слово вулиця (ulica) опускається  . Тому треба писати тільки Szkolna.
Myazyk (2017-10-20 10:20:16+00:00): Йди нахир, Полякофф!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
Alan (2015-10-28 23:15:08+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SK53 (2015-10-30 21:07:24+00:00): This is not a correction, it is the conversion of one tag into a different one with a different meaning. unsigned_ref contains a known ref value which is not signed. The tag I added had the meaning that the ref was not known because it was unsigned.
ChrissW-R1 (2015-10-30 22:48:57+00:00): Sorry for this. I had changed it because "unsigned:ref" only appears in this two features in the complete database!

But you're right, this is the correct tagging schema and so I'll revert it.
SK53 (2015-10-30 22:59:54+00:00): Yeah, what I wanted apparently was ref:signed=no, but I couldn't remember it as its not something I've used, but its useful to show that the ref is not available even after ground survey
ChrissW-R1 (2015-10-30 23:17:43+00:00): I agree to your decision. You entered a prefix to the key like abandoned or disused.
Alan (2015-10-28 23:14:24+00:00): Nice neighborhoods! Keep it up!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-29 15:50:07+00:00): Does "North Miami Beach" need to be re-added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/118860/history , before it became an advertisment)?  There's also a node, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/154288838 .
wambacher (2015-10-29 18:24:14+00:00): Yes, you'r right. User "All miami pools" destroid the boundaries and changed name to "All miami pools" too, like his username. That confused me and i deleted that "rubbish".

Sorry, for that. restored this relation and it should be ok now.

see: http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/34955402
Alan (2015-10-28 23:13:27+00:00): Nice path! Keep it up!
Sergey82K (2017-11-16 15:31:02+00:00): Поверніть сходи назад:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301916313#map=18/50.45709/30.43167&layers=N
Kilkenni (2017-11-18 22:29:07+00:00): Не зрозумів. Що саме?
Sergey82K (2017-11-19 12:17:17+00:00): Сходи у підземний перехід Перемоги/Шутова
По лінку: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301916313#map=18/50.45709/30.43167&layers=N
Kilkenni (2017-11-19 23:32:30+00:00): А, бачу. Здається,це зламав не я, але я поправив:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2033231155/history
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 12:07:44+00:00): This is a changeset with a very large area!  How do I, as a local mapper in the area that's covered, work out what's been changed near me?
Also, "Integrity checks for ways" doesn't actually explain what the problem before was, and you did to fix it.  Using meaningful changeset comments helps mappers work together and understand what each other is doing.
Helixstone (2017-09-11 19:01:19+00:00): Jagdhaus
 Staucheralm ist weiter östlich
MagnesiaRocks (2017-09-11 22:04:08+00:00): Oh Hi Theo,
du hast recht, hätte eig die hier sein sollen:
47.6924, 12.07713
Wie heißt dann die die ich hier aus Versehen erwischt habe?
MagnesiaRocks (2017-09-11 22:04:43+00:00): Ah ok :D
Warin61 (2016-06-13 23:19:20+00:00): Changed sport=football to sport=australian_football;gaelic_games
on way 74481627 - St Marys Park.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
Hadi57 (2015-10-29 07:07:20+00:00): this is one way
Supaplex (2015-10-29 07:20:30+00:00): 可以用國土的opendata圖層畫畫道路
Supaplex (2015-10-29 09:37:54+00:00): 重覆了，請把Wheelmap相關訊息加到整個區域吧
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
pratikyadav (2015-10-29 07:23:28+00:00): very nice editing. Thank you :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
Raymond (2015-10-29 13:08:13+00:00): Hallo Rogehm, danke fürs Eintragen von Saturn Connect. Ich verstehe aber nicht ganz diese Bearbeitung. Wenn ich das richtig sehe, hast du den Adidas-Laden Richtung Osten verschoben, in das Gebäude von Sport Scheck. Lt. http://www.koeln.de/koeln/saturn-connect_965077.html ist Adidas aber (weiterhin) im selben Gebäude wie Saturn Connect?
Firefishy (2015-10-29 11:11:56+00:00): We only map features that physically exist on the ground. If this feature exists and is known by people locally by that name, then great... if only future planned... then it should not be mapped.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
neuhausr (2015-10-29 14:21:18+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Remember that the data you enter into OSM should be accurate, verifiable information. This looks like it might be a joke, so please correct it or provide a source for your info. Thanks
cquest (2015-10-29 07:52:21+00:00): ATTENTION, tout les changesets de ces derniers jours ont de gros problèmes.
Les tags des polygones ne sont pas à recopier sur chacun des noeuds qui les composent.
Il va falloir faire un revert de tout ça car c'est impossible de tout reprendre en correction.
mueschel (2016-05-07 21:40:15+00:00): Hi 2bre99,
you added the tag "source = Google Maps Street View" to "The Lakes". Please note that OSM is not allowed to use any information from Google Maps. Please remove all content that you copied from them.

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
cquest (2015-10-29 08:07:42+00:00): Changeset annulé, trop d'erreurs

On ne doit pas copier les tags des way sur les noeuds.
waldhans (2015-10-29 18:03:31+00:00): Ich habe den basin-type wieder korrigiert, der Name sei dir geschenkt. 'name-Tag Missbrauch' finde ich trotzdem etwas stark.
Aber vor funktionalen Änderungen (detention=>retention) solltest du entweder den Mapper kontaktieren oder ins Internet sehen (http://www.niersverband.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Download/Flyer_RBF_Duelkener_Nette.pdf).
user_2230854 (2015-10-29 18:39:12+00:00): Zum name-Tag: Das Teil heißt nicht so, sondern ist ein ...
Laut Flyer sind das Retention-Becken mit Filterung und keine Infiltration-Becken. Letztere sind laut Wicki Versickerungsbecken, was hier IMO eindeutig nicht zutrifft.
Auch die intention-Becken sind laut Flyer Regenrückhaltenbecken (Retention). intention gilt laut Wiki für Hochwasserrückhaltebecken. Das ist hier nicht gegeben, da es hier laut Flyer um Regenwasser geht.
waldhans (2015-10-29 20:10:10+00:00): wo ist hier ein 'intention'? Und wo findest du die Unterscheidung  Hoch- und Regenwasser?
user_2230854 (2015-10-30 06:09:51+00:00): Stimmt, meinte natürlich die detention-Becken. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dbasin + weiterführender Link zu wikipedia
Olsztyn (2016-01-13 13:06:47+00:00): Czy mógłbym prosić o niedodawanie uparcie nazw "Stefanii Sempołowskiej" i "Tadeusza Stępowskiego" na mapie? Jak napisałem w komentarzu do zmiany zostały one nadane w 1983 roku, ale nigdy nie zostały wyznaczone w terenie. Na dodatek na planach znajdowały się na drugim końcu osiedla. Może więc użytkownik michalmgm poda podstawę do ciągłego nanoszenia tego błędu na mapę?
michalmgm (2016-01-13 18:34:38+00:00): "Do ciągłego"... Naniosłem zmiany po raz pierwszy, odwołując się do innych map. A prosić zawsze można.
Olsztyn (2016-01-13 19:12:32+00:00): A ja w historii widzę dwukrotne wpisanie tych nazw - 9 i 3 miesiące temu. Na mapie Miejskiego Systemu Informacji Przestrzennej Miasta Olsztyna obie ulice występują jako boczne jezdnie ulicy Jarosława Iwaszkiewicza.
PlaneMad (2019-07-17 10:49:17+00:00): Amazing work with the survey and mapping around Sabarimala. Have made some more updates and corrections, please check.
j-wills (2015-11-01 19:13:25+00:00): Моветон делать правки без развёрнутого коментария!

А вообще, Потлач - отстой! JOSM рекомендую! ;)
MKnight (2015-10-31 09:33:20+00:00): Was hat es denn mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377440273 auf sich?
fjavier_gr (2022-11-28 18:53:47+00:00): Por favor, ¿Puedes dar la fuente de la referencia de la carretera?
limes11 (2022-10-16 08:43:17+00:00): Hi, 

sorry, ist ein paar Jahre her, aber hier eine Note, die Zweifel am Straßennamen streut. Du hattest ihn in diesem CS von "...weg" auf "...straße" im Ort geändert.

Kannst Du den Hinweis kommentieren? Danke!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2808249
Geofreund1 (2022-10-16 17:22:49+00:00): Wenn jemand vor Ort wirklich ein Straßenschild mit ...weg gesehen hat, sollte man auch ...weg eintragen. Ich bezog mich seinerzeit auf die "amtliche" Unterlage ORKA M-V, wo es ...straße benannt ist.
Osmonav (2015-10-29 11:36:28+00:00): Taxi boat ist eine Bezeichnung, aber sicher nicht der Name der Linie. Tagging für den Renderer?
GerdP (2015-10-29 11:58:57+00:00): wahrscheinlich, ich habe nur das Tag highway=wassertaxi entfernt
MKnight (2016-03-16 20:42:38+00:00): Die Treppe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130411129#map=19/50.92903/11.58557 ist mit nichts verbunden.
trigpoint (2015-10-29 12:49:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
I see you have deleted Cardiff central firestation from the map. Do you have a reason for this as I am told it is still there.
trigpoint (2015-10-29 18:06:01+00:00): I have reverted this in changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34954658
az09 (2016-01-21 14:21:26+00:00): WTF supervised
GerdP (2015-10-30 07:57:02+00:00): please review way 24855256:
1) the tag
highway=residential; residential; unclassified; residential; unclassified
is invalid
2) you have combined parts of roads
with different names into something that looks like a roundabout, but it doesn't seem to be one (it doesn't have the "right of way"). Assuming that Bing is up to date,
this looks wrong.
GerdP (2015-10-31 08:52:25+00:00): no idea?
Peilscheibe (2015-10-29 21:31:11+00:00): Dass diese temporäre Installation evtl. demnächst zurückgebaut wird, hast Du mitbekommen, ja? (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/340597). In dem Changeset sind übrigens noch zwei nodes enthalten, die als mini-roundabout getaggt sind, was im jetzigen Zustand kaputt ist. Der getaggte Name des Kreisverkehrs, ist das eine offizielle Bezeichnung? Woher stammt das? Ich bitte darum, die Bearbeitungen nochmal kritisch zu überdenken.
Peilscheibe (2015-10-29 22:12:45+00:00): Habe gerade gelesen, dass er wohl doch bleibt und ausgebaut wird: http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.leonberg-gerlingen-der-playmobil-kreisel-darf-bleiben.96bddd64-d33a-4a4d-a240-3f68ef92e710.html
Bleibt also die Bitte, die (es sind vier) falsch getaggten Nodes zu überarbeiten und den Namen zu überprüfen.
Jojo4u (2015-10-30 23:51:02+00:00): Ja den Namen kann ich nicht finden, nur den loc_name Playmobil-Kreisel.
Ganz kurios: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/82656259
Jojo4u (2016-07-10 22:51:34+00:00): Ist mittlerweile alles bereinigt.
BladeTC (2016-08-08 20:32:02+00:00): Celso, esta area esta marcada errada. Comercio pode marcar com um ponto, não em volta da cidade.
phin (2015-10-29 13:11:44+00:00): added most visible residential areas and some smaller roads/paths, size is hard to estimate, are also hard to distinguish from creeks/small rivers..
CJTmmr (2015-11-02 20:39:36+00:00): "Sesamstraat" voor het steegje van Graaf Florisweg naar Steenhouwerij Polet op nr 122 -is dat serieus? Ik kom er dagelijks langs en nog nooit een bordje gezien...
Groeten van CJTmmr
5m4u9 (2015-10-29 16:37:11+00:00): gracias por editar el mapa. 

Mejoré la información que añadiste y si puedes añadir más nombres de calles, su superficie, la dirección estaría bueno.
literan (2015-10-29 14:39:55+00:00): leisure=garden это тег для декоративных цветников, садиков, альпийских горок и др.! не верится, что вокруг Рязани много такого))) Может, там сады, в смысле, где яблони растут? тогда тег совсем другой: landuse=orchard http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dorchard
maraf24 (2015-11-01 01:06:23+00:00): Można by dodać coś wiecej, link do opisu; zdjęcia, datę powstania itp.
maraf24 (2015-11-01 01:05:02+00:00): Poprawiłem.
GerdP (2015-11-16 20:24:40+00:00): please review:
the combination bicycle=designated ,horse=yes and surface=sand looks
looks wrong. Typically one doesn't like to 
cycle on sand, esp. not when horses destroy the surface ;-)
freeExec (2015-11-02 08:16:38+00:00): Там где крупный шаг у столбов, наверное всё таки это высоковольтные power=tower
bekreyev (2015-11-02 08:19:58+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:power?uselang=ru

power=tower
Опоры линии электропередачи, кроме столбов. Столбы отмечать power=pole

А это явно столбы, это видно по тени. Когда вижу tower - ставлю tower
freeExec (2015-11-02 08:28:38+00:00): Я тоже так думал, но народ с этим не согласен и pole это именно маленкие "столбики", что внутри нас пунктов.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=514773#p514773
bekreyev (2015-11-02 08:35:42+00:00): Пока не вижу в этом "народа", предлагается вместо точного перевода слова "столб"="pole" делать по несколько тегов - вопрос для чего?

Не нашёл в tower ничего, похожего на столб:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dtower
freeExec (2015-11-02 08:41:00+00:00): Ну как же structure=solid + material=concrete 
А на картинках нет, т.к. они простые и меняется только количество уровней.
bekreyev (2015-11-02 08:44:25+00:00): Ну я понимаю о чём ты, но не понимаю зачем левая сущность. Стоб - он и есть столб. А тут предлагается гирлянду из тегов - это не логично и не описано в документации. Мне в iD неудобно несколько тегов вешать на каждый столб, это и так занимает массу времени. Проще потом любителям гирлянд поправить массово, чем мне вдвое больше времени тратить не понятно на что.
freeExec (2015-11-02 08:51:28+00:00): В документации кстати есть, для тега столб, указано, что он меленький низковольтный столб или мачта. И там на привьюшке как раз решётчатый столб.
А в id в чём разница вешать один тег или другой?
bekreyev (2015-11-02 08:56:01+00:00): Разница в том сколько тегов вешать. Да и высоту опор и столбов я не знаю, напряжения тоже, зато чётко видно когда столб, а когда опора. Точнее столбы ЛЭП даже не видно иногда на спутниковых снимках.
maraf24 (2015-11-01 01:01:10+00:00): Serwis rowerowy w banku?
secmap (2015-11-02 07:23:01+00:00): 302805126, v3 - Anschlussstelle Ravelsbach, Auffahrt Richtung Wien: seit 2 Jahren nicht mehr befahrbar, nur noch Serviceauffahrt für Winterdienst, neue Auffahrt vorbei am Gasthof Ravelsbacherhof, am Ortsende einmündend in dreispurige B4. War schon so gemappt.
Wolfgang B (2015-11-05 09:44:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Straßenanbindungen angepasst.
acsd (2016-01-11 20:09:21+00:00): подъезды обозначаются так http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:entrance#Входы_и_адресация
GerdP (2015-10-30 07:47:44+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=plantation is only used here, I guess you meant highway=track ?
GerdP (2015-11-05 09:42:11+00:00): I've changed it, see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35097674
gileri (2015-10-30 16:51:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Bienvenue à OpenStreetMap !

Vous avez créé 2 nœuds qui ne sont pas rattachés à la route, et j'ai du mal à cerner leur signification. Pouvez-vous m'éclairer afin que l'on rende les données exploitables ?
gileri (2015-11-01 13:53:28+00:00): J'ai supprimé les noeuds concernés pour éviter de laisser des données incorrectes trop longtemps. N'hésitez pas à répondre ici ou en message privée si vous avez besoin d'aide pour intégrer des données sur OSM.
GerdP (2015-10-30 08:15:26+00:00): please review, the tag 
highway=unclassified;service
is invalid (Ephraim Gully Grove)
This is likely to happen with iD, so take
care ;-)
Firefishy (2015-10-29 16:47:59+00:00): Awesome contributions! Thank you. Loving the railway contributions. If you have absolutely any questions... I'd be happy to answer them for you. Kind regards, Grant
trigpoint (2015-10-29 18:33:13+00:00): Hi
Something appears to have gone wrong here, you seem to have removed the A470 bridge over Afon Prysor, what were you trying to do?
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:15:18+00:00): Hi, sorry for the delay, I was unable to login until I returned to work. The reason for my edit is that I was recently using an Android GPS app (Navigator), which uses this map, to navigate through Trawsfynydd, but the route wouldn't span the bridge; it would only re-direct me in a large 20 mile loop to the east until it returned me to the other side of the bridge. I had to conclude the bridge was faulty in some way, so I attempted to connect the two pieces of road together. I apologise if that caused a problem; I was only trying to help all those people who discover their GPS won't allow them to head straight up the A470.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:31:19+00:00): I also added Penrhos Isaf Bothy. I didn't realise each contribution should be done separately, and appropriately described. Soz.