piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_11435438 (2022-01-02 05:53:40+00:00): 永州站货场不要加railway=station，这是场，不是站
Lancelotance (2022-01-02 08:49:24+00:00): 好的，谢谢指出。
Warin61 (2021-12-27 22:43:12+00:00): Hi,
Part reversion to restore pedestrian relation - restores deleted way 482481220.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-31 13:25:39+00:00): Do people really refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5441968 as "Western Sahara"?  I'd have thought that that was always used to refer to the whole area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2559126 instead.
Best Regards,
Andy
MxxCon (2021-12-27 06:44:19+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what kind of business is this? Based on the name it sounds like a grocery store or a deli, however you tagged it as a resturant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407014
Jaime Woo (2021-12-27 14:32:04+00:00): It's both a restaurant and a fish supplier (not really a full grocery but you can imagine the fish section of any local grocery).You can buy fresh seafood here (whole fish that you can take home to cook) and they also serve fried seafood at a counter near the front. I wasn't sure which tag to use, so I just chose restaurant because I have gotten fried fish takeout from here before.

Please advise on how to proceed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407014
MxxCon (2021-12-28 00:11:23+00:00): I updated this to have both types of tags, seafood shop and restaurant.👍
MxxCon (2021-12-27 06:59:28+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you remove building tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407267
Jaime Woo (2021-12-27 14:14:51+00:00): Hm, I didn't realize I removed the building tag. Using the OSM iD editor, I thought I was changing the type of this point from a Building to a more specific type of building, in this case a Climbing Gym. It looks like when I do this, it causes the "building" tag to be removed. I will re-add the tag.

It feels wrong for types to overlap (a point can be both a Building and a Climbing Gym, for exmaple) but for the iD editor to only allow one type to be selected. Do you know how I can reach out to the developers of iD to give them this feedback?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407267
Jaime Woo (2021-12-27 14:33:56+00:00): Sorry, I cannot figure out how to change the Feature Type tag to be Building again without removing the Climbing Gym tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407267
MxxCon (2021-12-27 15:08:24+00:00): iD developers are active on OSM World discord server. Or you can go directly to GitHub and open issue there. 👍
MxxCon (2021-12-27 15:13:02+00:00): Also I already corrected the building tag.
If iD's temple doesn't let you add building tag, you can scroll down in the left panel until you see all the tags and manually enter what you need. Just need to pay attention what you enter there since no validation for errors. 🙂
akadouri (2021-12-27 18:03:39+00:00): Hello, it looks like this building was redone recently (https://www.timeout.com/newyork/news/a-24-hour-bouldering-gym-with-a-rooftop-cafe-and-sauna-is-opening-in-brooklyn-041421). 

The Bing imagery looks different than the other imagery. Are the footprints still the same?

Also I believe you need to add `building=part` to the individual lines that make up the greater building relation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
Jaime Woo (2021-12-28 16:05:17+00:00): You're right; it doesn't really make sense to keep the existing lines since when you go inside, you see that it is all one contiguous space. They did some major renovations, knocking down walls to the point where the old smaller building footprints don't exist anymore. This entire building needs to be resurveyed for it to be accurate on OpenStreetMap.

Would a fixme tag be appropriate here?
akadouri (2021-12-28 17:42:02+00:00): It looks like the new footprint (from the Bing Imagery) is the same as the outermost footprint. I think the grass/plant areas may be on the roof which makes it a little confusing. You could combine all the parts to make one building. A fixme tag is fine if you'd like to leave a note on the situation.

If you want to tag the gym layout inside there are some indoor mapping tags, I'm not too familiar with them. Entrances/exits may be helpful too.
MxxCon (2021-12-27 07:37:23+00:00): Hello.
Please note that all tags ending with "_1" are invalid and must never be added to OSM. If you've seen them somewhere else, those are wrong entries and should be corrected. Please see this article that documents "name" and its variations tags in detail: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Additionally, you deleted 2 restaurant nodes and added those tags to buildings. Looking at the street level imagery I see that each restaurant takes up only the first floor in each build and above it are apartments/offices. As such, it is incorrect to tag the whole building as being those businesses. They must be mapped as separate nodes within the perimeter of the building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407970
Jaime Woo (2021-12-27 14:42:17+00:00): Sorry! I have seen _1 before so I thought it was ok to use. I added those tags because I feel that Nominatim's search leaves much to be desired. For example, if I search "Williamsburg Cinema" it takes me to Nitehawk Cinema, which is an entirely difference venue. However, if I search "Williamsburg Cinemas", it takes me to the correct venue.

It appears to be the case that the Nominatim search engine (which powers OpenStreetMap.org search) does not use any techniques such as stemming to match tags. Apparently, it requires the user to type in the exact feature name in order to produce the correct match. To remedy this for myself, I thought I would add multiple alt_names.

In the future I will use the advice in the article you linked: "If there are multiple names that do not fit, alt_name=* can be used with semicolons."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115407970
Warin61 (2021-12-27 22:34:16+00:00): Hi
The relation for Robina Waters 6467511 is very confused. A section of water to the north of Robina  Island is not part of Robina Waters yet to both the east and west those sections of water are part of Robina Waters. 

As an error Robina Island is mapped as an inner for Robina Waters .. yet it is no longer inside the outer way ... so should be excluded ... unless the northern water is actually part of Robina Water...???
Fizzie-DWG (2021-12-27 23:08:01+00:00): G'day Warin. Thanks for that! Yep, it's a mess! :-( Over time, Robina Waters Lake has been mapped in 3 seperate bits: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6467511#map=16/-28.0569/153.4127, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45715912, & 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45715910#map=17/-28.05404/153.40911, which is the bit to the North (& which I personally would have extended up to the Markeri Street bridge).
So, how do we tie all three of them in together?
Warin61 (2021-12-28 09:42:18+00:00): Done. 

Place all the ways in the relation. 
Delete the duplicate tags on the ways.
Break the ways where they overlay each other. Delete the overlaps. 

----------------
I have also removed landuse=forest and replaced with natural=wood.
Fizzie-DWG (2021-12-28 22:59:30+00:00): Thanks, mate!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:28:23+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9369041795/history
cityofgod (2022-10-17 10:44:39+00:00): Okay. I'm not going to go to the trouble of changing my old features to the new tags or participating in the mailing list discussion (you're free to do both, of course).

What tags should I use next time for an outdoor drinking fountain like the one in this photo? https://www.drinkingwaterfountains.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Drinking-Water-Fountain.jpg
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-18 00:44:29+00:00): I would use amenity=drinking_water + fountain=bubbler

fountain=bubbler can be added anyway to such tags as used here

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:fountain%3Dbubbler

I am planning to propose https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Deprecate_man_made%3Ddrinking_fountain - and I will see whether deprecation has broad support
user_2066394 (2021-12-27 11:39:48+00:00): Da fehlt jetzt aber zumindest shop=car ? Ggf. noch service=dealer;repair ergänzen?

Ist das tatsächlich EIN Gebäude oder eher zwei Gebäudeteile? Im Luftbild wirken die Dächer ungleich hoch.

Auf der Homepage präsentiert sich das Unternehmen als "Autohaus Renner".
"Autohaus Renner GmbH & Co. KG" ggf. eher als operator=* ?
Dmithry (2021-12-29 07:27:54+00:00): Danke für deinen Kommentar, ich habe das erforderliche Tag (shop = car; car_repair) basierend auf Daten von der offiziellen Website (https://www.toyota-renner.de/) hinzugefügt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115410368
skyper (2022-01-25 01:41:11+00:00): Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74522
NieWnen (2021-12-31 19:19:56+00:00): Po co te foot i bicycle? Przecież to są domyślne accessy...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=trunk%20link?uselang=pl
NastiaP1 (2022-01-05 12:31:16+00:00): Location and tag of Autohaus Kolbeck updated according to the user's feedback and official website https://www.toyota-kolbeck-grossmehring.de/ Name of POI Toyota deleted because Toyota representative in this area is located at BLUMENSTR. 7 according to the official website (linked above)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115411184
bad_mapper (2021-12-27 18:57:00+00:00): hi! need to return the removed forest feature. thanks!
Ho_Rider (2022-01-03 08:03:38+00:00): Hi bad_mapper, thank you for restoring the removed tag and fixing the unclosed polygon.
user_5359 (2021-12-28 17:43:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator.
user_5359 (2021-12-28 17:46:23+00:00): AED moved to https://www.osm.org/node/9373649038
angys (2022-08-22 13:42:01+00:00): Please do not add Sungai at name of the road
https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/92#issuecomment-875298576
eggie (2021-12-27 08:08:10+00:00): Dag Jan,

Houd er wel rekening mee dat motor_vehicle=destination ook moped en mofa stopt.
Dan dus bijtaggen moped=yes mofa=yes
foot en bicycle=yes zijn default op wegen. Die hoef je niet toe te voegen.
Kwaad kan het hier natuurlijk ook niet.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115412545
MVG
eggie
j numminen (2021-12-27 09:18:33+00:00): Linkitän vielä tärkeän tietolähteeni (Mapillary). Kuva on Tupasaarentieltä, ja oikeassa reunassa näkyy jalkakäytävä-merkki sekä sen lisäkilpi, joka kertoo vaikutusalueen ulottuvan molempiin suuntiin, oikealle ja vasemmalle. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=495978268316691
Frame&Focus (2022-01-18 21:21:46+00:00): Looks great, thanks for contributing to OSM! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115414507
nagdange (2022-10-28 11:45:04+00:00): Hi,

I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for the appreciation. Looking forward to contribute more to OSM. 

Regards,
Nagdange
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
RicoElectrico (2021-12-28 13:41:48+00:00): Cześć, w tej zmianie kolega poprawił tę edycję, zmienił kategorię drogi oraz usunął nazwę (zazwyczaj boczne drogi odchodzące od nazwanej drogi nie powinny mieć jej nazwy).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115439120
eggie (2021-12-27 10:07:04+00:00): Beset HMSM.. Je aanpassing kan onmogelijk kloppen.
Wanneer halverwege in de straat het verkeer eindigt in eenrichtingsverkeer. Het stukje dat aansluit op dePaulKrugerlaan staat west oost.. De rest van de straat oost-west?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-27 10:17:18+00:00): De routering heb ik hersteld door oneway=yes te verwijderen op de oversteek Paul Krugerlaan.
Uitzonderingen op eenrichtingsverkeer tweewielers toegevoegd op Joubertstraat. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-27 10:25:05+00:00): Aanvulling... Eenrichingverkeer kan zichzelf nooit tegenkomen halverwege een straat. Je zit dan als het ware opgesloten. 
Maar het zal zo weer kloppen.
HMSM (2021-12-27 11:45:22+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

Bedankt voor het nakijken en aanpassen.

ik wil een aanpassing doen op de kruising Vaillantlaan - Waldorpstraat, den haag maar dit lukt niet.

Zou jij de aanpassing willen maken?

Je mag niet meer links af slaan vanaf de Vaillantlaan naar de Waldorpstraat.

Gr.
eggie (2021-12-27 11:49:42+00:00): Zal straks even kijken
eggie (2021-12-27 12:16:16+00:00): Die afslagbeperking staat er gewoon al in.
Ik heb alleen except=bus toegevoegd. Die mag wel afslaan.
Het is overigens de Calandstraat daar.
Dus kruising Calandstraat -Waldorpstraat.
Gr eggie
HMSM (2021-12-27 12:21:36+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

bedankt voor het aanpassen.

Gr.
eggie (2021-12-27 12:23:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.0642%2C4.3099%3B52.0715%2C4.3249#map=18/52.06344/4.31449

Die mogelijkheid om rechtsaf te slaan en daar te keren heb ik ook toegevoegd.
De routing app loopt altijd een beetje achter in het effect.
HMSM (2021-12-27 12:31:20+00:00): Top, dankje
eggie (2021-12-27 12:37:50+00:00): Er staat dus nu een afslagbeperking op het zuidelijk deel van de Waldorpstraat
ter hoogte van de lunchroom. Daar ligt een doorgetrokken streep.  
Maar vreemde fratsen in de routering houd je altijd als de routingapp de kortste weg zoekt.
Larmax (2022-01-30 14:20:05+00:00): Moi! Huomasin, että olit jostain syystä käyttänyt addr:streetnumber=*-tägiä addr:housenumberin sijaan. Addr:streetnumber on käytössä oikeastaan vain Tšekissä ja Slovakiassa, jossa on muusta maailmasta poikkeava osoitejärjestelmä.
ahven (2022-07-13 14:37:38+00:00): Korjattu, kiitos huomiosta.
eggie (2021-12-27 09:54:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. De Tarwewijk staat al als placenode gemapt op de kaart va OSM.
Dze manier van taggen is niet conform de conventie van OSM.
Wat is je bedoeling?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115416739


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-27 09:59:25+00:00): reverted by changeset  #115417483
meinmap (2022-01-24 12:55:18+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che il tratto di ss32 ticinese è stato declassato a strada terziaria con l'apertura della nuova variante? Secondo me rimane comunque una strada primaria...
gspinoza (2022-01-24 15:24:59+00:00): Ciao meinmap
come sai bene per definire su OSM un tipo di strada non si usano le classificazioni ufficiali. Per dire, una SS non è sempre primaria e una SP non è sempre terziaria o secondaria. Per cui, non so se la vecchia SS32 è stata ufficialmente declassata, ma nel momento in cui viene bypassata da una variante, direi che automaticamente la sua importanza viene diminuita. Posso citare molti altri casi in cui si è fatto così.
Saluti
meinmap (2022-01-24 15:35:23+00:00): Mi fido senza ulteriori esempi :)
Grazie mille
Nakaner (2023-06-23 13:43:08+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz hier die Existenz eines Radfahrstreifens erfasst. Das ist laut den Mapillary-Bildern leider falsch. Ein Radfahrstreifen ist durch das Vorhandensein eines Radweg-Schilds (Zeichen 237 der StVO) oder weißer (Baustellen: gelber) markierter Fahrrad-Piktogramme erkennbar. Fehlt das und ist der "Radfahrstreifen" nur durch eine weiße durchgezogene Linie von der Fahrbahn getrennt, handelt es sich um einen Seitenstreifen.

Ferner hast du ergänzt, dass auf diesem "Radfahrstreifen" die Benutzung entgegen der Fahrtrichtung erlaubt sei. Dafür benötigt es laut § 2 StVO das Zeichen 237, 240 oder 241 oder das Zusatzzeichen "Radverkehr frei" (ggf. alleinstehend). Auch das gibt es laut Mapillary dort nicht.

Derartige Falschangabe verleiten Leute zum Benutzen dieser Wege, obwohl es eine Ordnungswidrigkeit darstellt. Der Seitenstreifen ist dort so schmal, dass Radfahrende bei Fahrrad-Gegenverkehr auf die Fahrbahn (ggf. in den motorisierten Gegenverkehr) ausweichen müssen.

Ich habe diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:07:56+00:00): Ciao Walter. L'osmc:symbol inserito in questa relazione è errato. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:15:40+00:00): Ciao Walter, l'osmc:symbol inserito su questa relazione è errato. Ciao, Andrea
Kovoschiz (2021-12-27 14:00:59+00:00): Please don't add generic or personal labels.
luiswoo (2021-12-27 11:26:08+00:00): Каковы причины этого "name corrected"?
spely (2021-12-27 17:37:17+00:00): >Основное название объекта. Обычно то, как это называют люди, а не полное юридическое наименование.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name

>Названия должны ограничиваться только именем предмета и не должны включать слова-категории которые мы обозначаем тегами, описания, адрес и почтовый индекс либо замечание (notes).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE

+ сами данные неверны. например, садоводство Автомобилист-Дон, названное здесь СНТ, на самом деле не СНТ, а НТСО.
luiswoo (2021-12-27 20:57:47+00:00): 1) С тем же успехом из name=Цимлянское шоссе, (не)можно удалить "шоссе" — это не название, а статус. Короче, статус в осм фактически не поддерживается и по этому по запросу "Автомобилист-Дон" будут вываливаться всё, что имеет такое название. На запрос неСНТ Автомобилист-Дон будет — ничего не найдено. Еще короче — это общепринятая форма записи для СНТ. Таже проблема с реками и островами: успехов с запросом "река Дон" на сайте осм.
2) Какая тут логика: СНТ не правильно — удалить без замены на НТСО?
spely (2021-12-28 10:44:28+00:00): Аналогия с шоссе понятна, но она ложная, поскольку:
1) "xxx шоссе" - устоявшийся топоним, который используют люди в реальной жизни. "СНТ yyy"/ "НТСО zzz", "ТО nnn" и т.д. не используют.
2) Именование дорог ограничивает Соглашение. Я не могу ни с каким "успехом" ничего отбрасывать.

Если такая форма записи для СНТ общепринята, то где отражение этой нормы в вики?
Более того, эта форма противоречит выдержкам, которые  я привёл в предыдущем комментарии.
Да и аппеляция к традиции - одна из логических ошибок. 

К вашему пункту 2:
Логика бинарная. 
(landuse=allotments + name = Автомобилист-Дон) - истинно, поскольку landuse=allotments описывает Земельные участки, использующиеся объединением людей, для земледелия. (Все организационно-правовые формы, и СНТ, и НТСО, и ТО и др.)
Да, неоптимально. Лучше было бы использовать связку name+operator или name+official_name

(landuse=allotments + name = СНТ "Автомобилист-Дон") - ложно, поскольку Автомобилист-Дон не СНТ.

В дальнейшей дискуссии не вижу смысла.
luiswoo (2021-12-28 14:52:43+00:00): 1)Так "шоссе" — это название?
«Продам земельный участок 136 в Надежденском районе СНТ "РЕЧНОЕ"» — да, не используют.
2) (не)можно
3)Это должен кто-то написать, что бы оно появилось, но достаточно пройтись по любым регинам РФ и таки убедиться, что повсеместно; Соглашение об наименовании дорог тоже противоречит этой выдержке.
4) Не истинно — это для человека оно что-то описывает, для программы это пустой звук. «река Дон» уже нашлась? Не лучше, для этого, тут как с НП, нужен тотже не поддерживаемый ни кем тег offical_status=СНТ.
5) На нет и суда нет, всего хорошего.
Patchanka (2021-12-27 13:43:00+00:00): attention le nom figurait déjà sur l'équipement sportif "Arène" (leisure=stadium) donc ce n'est pas la peine de le remettre sur le terrain qui est compris dans l'équipement.
Jese40 (2021-12-27 16:05:43+00:00): C'est bien noté, merci.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:07:43+00:00): Ciao Walter. L'osmc:symbol inserito in questa relazione è errato. Ciao, Andrea
obst96 (2022-03-31 10:08:22+00:00): Krokusweg Hausnummer 3 zwei mal vergeben. Erstmal entfernt.
puma515 (2021-12-28 19:45:22+00:00): Moin, überwiegend ist das richtig aber der Schlüssel: nature_reserve ist genauso unpassend wie Park habe das jetzt so wie das auch bei allen andren Naturparks in Schleswigholstein ist auf: boundary=protected_area geändert. 

Grund ist das das hier die Außengrenze ist. 
Es gibt innerhalb der Naturparks  auch ausgewiesene Naturschutzgebiete die sind aber nur ein kleiner Teil der Flächen und nicht alles. Das meiste wird normal Landwirtschaftlich genutzt. 
Schön gruß puma515
SafetyIng (2021-12-28 16:14:26+00:00):  	Hey, ich finde den Changesetkommentar hier leider wenig aussagekräftig, könntest du da vielleicht in Zukunft drauf anchten? Danke im voraus!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
4004 (2021-12-28 19:13:06+00:00): но там ведь только тротуар? и заезды на него на перекрестках
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 11:27:01+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. I valori consentiti per il tag surface sono elencati qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface?uselang=it Come vedi, "surface=sterrato" non è una combinazione corretta. Inoltre non dovresti inserire nomi generici sui path. Ciao, Andrea
wkdgs (2022-01-03 08:35:14+00:00): Hi,

weißt du woher der Name "Schwarzer Weg" kommt? Heißt der Weg vielleicht inoffiziell so?

Vielleicht bietet sich ja einer der anderen name-Tags (loc_name, old_name, alt_name) an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115420653
stadt-RE-FP (2022-01-05 09:15:28+00:00): Hi winkeldings,
wir recherchieren aktuell noch in alten Katasterunterlagen, ob es dort einen Hinweis auf den "Schwarzen Weg" in Suderwich gibt. Bisher haben wir nichts gefunden. Möglich dass es einen Bezug zum Bergbau gab, aber das ist auch sehr vage.
Im Zuge der Recherche hat ein Kollege jedoch einen Hinweis auf einen "Schwarzen Weg" in Hillen gefunden, der im Bereich des alten Entsorgungsbetriebs am Bruchweg 66, an der Bahnlinie gelegen haben soll. Dieser führte an der östlichen Seite des Bahndamms vorbei. Er war für die auf der Zeche General Blumenthal arbeitenden Bergleute eingerichtet worden, aber war nie ein offizieller Straßenname in RE.
VG 
stadt-RE-FP
stadt-RE-FP (2022-01-14 09:21:08+00:00): Hallo Winkeldings,
ein Kollege hat sich noch einmal diverse Katasterpläne angesehen und keinen Hinweis über einen "schwarzen Weg" gefunden. Der Weg taucht erstmals in den 50er Jahren in Karten auf und wurde seitdem im Kataster immer mit der Bezeichnung "Weg" geführt.
VG
stadt-RE-FP
sorcrosc (2021-12-27 18:07:49+00:00): Ciao. Con questa modifica hai eliminato una strada ed un cimitero esistenti. Ho fatto un ripristino.

Lorenzo