piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
דוד-צבי (2022-09-29 08:25:55+00:00): I'm not talking about the destination signs, which are indeed blue for intercity destinations on the in-city signs; I'm talking about the road NUMBER signs. These are only about the category of the road, and as the rule said - they are the only thing that matter...
As you can see in the table, in the Trunk category there is a red number sign.
By the way, you can see it in the very picture that you sent: the number "16" is red; therefore mapped as a Trunk. The "1" on the signs is blue on this part, therefore need to be marked as a Motorway

By the way, are you Israeli?...
Car162 (2022-10-03 17:40:40+00:00): Yes, I am an Israeli from birth and my native language/mother's language is Hebrew
Car162 (2022-10-03 17:45:06+00:00): The different between motorway and trunk road is not clear in Israel, I need to ask Netivei Israel about national road 1
דוד-צבי (2022-10-06 08:45:08+00:00): אז בוא נעבור לעברית - יקל על שנינו להתבטא... :)
לשאול את נתיבי ישראל נשמע כמו רעיון מעולה - אם יש לך דרך אפקטיבית לעשות את זה..
אבל חשוב לציין שכאמור, לפי כללי הקהילה, צריך לשאול אותם מה צבע המספר בקטע הכביש המדובר ולא מה ההגדרה החוקית בעברית
Car162 (2022-10-13 13:52:11+00:00): זה בהחלט ברור
דוד-צבי (2022-10-14 06:54:47+00:00): שאלת? מה אמרו?
Car162 (2022-10-16 08:14:56+00:00): עדיין לא החזירו תשובה
Car162 (2022-10-16 08:24:37+00:00): שלחתי לפני חצי שבוע פנייה
chl-osm (2022-10-23 21:34:46+00:00): Attention, le Bahn Mi était en face. Vu ce soir : le Pachuco est toujours là. Je rétablis.
lunaticstraydog (2022-10-24 07:05:51+00:00): Ok, merci, désolé de l'erreur
74523978 (2022-09-20 18:35:13+00:00): Ook tuintjes nu getagd als bosjes.
74523978 (2022-10-02 00:11:43+00:00): Inspanningen om met o.a. struikgewas, de omgeving herkenbaar te maken en barrières aan te geven niet meer getoond op de kaart. Weinig gemotiveerd zo nog struikgewas in te tekenen. Misschien was het omtaggen iets te vooruitstrevend. Zag er op zich prima uit met scrub als struikgewas, al was het nooit de perfecte tag. Er is dus helaas, vreemd genoeg, geen defacto tag specifiek voor struikgewas. Volgens de wiki wordt leisure=garden als mogelijkheid gesuggereerd voor goed onderhouden struikgewas. Shrubbery is, in ieder geval voorlopig, afgewezen en zal niet worden gerenderd. Ik wil eigenlijk natural=scrub weer gebruiken voor struikgewas en waar nodig leisure=garden. Indien je het hier niet mee eens bent graag consensus via het forum.
jonrellim (2022-10-02 00:40:39+00:00): Ik plaats m'n reply even hier omdat het forum in migratie is. Dit zijn allemaal prima argumenten behalve het punt over het feit dat het niet gerenderd wordt. Dat is geen reden om de tag niet te gebruiken. We mappen niet voor de renderer. Dat "scrub" het er prima deed uitzien is daarom ook een foute logica. Die tag is daar niet voor bedoeld en zou je dan alleen gebruiken omdat het er "leuk uit ziet". De tag shrubbery zelf is wel goedgekeurd op OSM en kan dus vrij gebruikt worden. Gezien die tag nu voor de meesten het dichts bij het fenomeen van onderhouden struikgewas komt zorgt ervoor dat deze in Nederland wel vaker wordt gebruikt. En dit is naar mijn mening ook de beste oplossing. Nogmaals, we mappen niet voor de renderer. Ik snap dat je enig voldoening krijgt als je je resultaat ook kan zien op de carto renderer, maar we weten allemaal best dat de carto renderer maar een klein deel van alle informatie laat zien.
74523978 (2022-10-02 00:59:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=shrubbery
Zie onder "Tag status"

En "taggen voor de renderer" vind ik een zwak argument. Geen enkele renderer of app toont shrubbery.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-02 04:38:43+00:00): "Geen enkele renderer of app toont shrubbery."

Nog niet, nee. Ik zou ook geen tag renderen die niet eens gebruikt wordt. Daar zijn we nu eerst mee bezig. Het verzoek is daarom ook om de tag te laten staan. 

Zie ter informatie ook https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4530
highflyer74 (2022-09-21 15:51:03+00:00): Moin!

Hier gab es einige unverbundene Wege und doppelte Nodes, welche ich gefixt habe. Sei so nett, keine Flächen einzuzeichnen, welche lediglich das Tag area=yes beinhalten. Dies taucht in diversen Qualitätssicherungswerkzeugen auf und hat datentechnisch keinerlei Mehrgewinn.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich gern direkt hier im Changeset.

Viele Grüße aus dem Norden!
ulonitz (2022-09-22 12:06:11+00:00): Hi,
danke für deinen Hinweis. Allerdings treffen die Änderungen, die du bezüglich der beiden "Areas" gemacht hast , nicht ganz die Ortverhältnisse. Die von mir eingezeichneten Flächen werden alsEinfahrt oder Hof zum Laden und Entladen von Gütern genutzt. Leider habe ich keine betreffenden Eigenschaften für solche Flächen gefunden.
Grüße
Uwe
snoozingnewt (2022-10-01 00:43:56+00:00): These building outlines seem inaccurate, what method are you using to draw them?
jaap de vries (2022-10-11 08:32:34+00:00): Ik zag dat je hier bij het Lieve vrouwenplein aanpassingen hebt gedaan, er waren ook opmerkingen op de kaart aanwezig. Misschien heb je die gezien, graag dan deze ook sluiten dan weten andere mappers dat ook en hoeven ze niet dit af te gaan...
LHERRERA50 (2022-09-20 18:54:53+00:00): Contact us for! carswellrealestate.com
Lachgast (2023-04-09 08:41:06+00:00): Ha die SteKel!
Leuk om nog iemand in de buurt actief te zien!
Het viel me zojuist op dat je vrijliggende fietspaden hebt ingetekend langs de Gansstraat in Utrecht. De Gansstraat heeft geen vrijliggende fietspaden, maar fietssuggestiestroken.

Fietssuggestiestroken voeg je toe aan de hoofdweg (in dit geval de highway=residential). Je voegt dan sleutel+waarde cycleway=lane toe. De fietspaden hoef je dan niet meer apart in te tekenen. Op kaarten als Openfietsmap en OSM's 'eigen' CyclOSM en Fietskaart staan de fietsstroken aangegeven met blauwe strepen.

Je werk is hier dus dubbelop! Zou je de fietspaden weer willen weghalen of zal ik het doen? Beiden zijn prima.

In ieder geval heel veel plezier met karteren en tot ziens op de kaart!
Lachgast (2023-04-09 08:42:11+00:00): Overigens bedoel ik met dubbelop dat de fietsstroken reeds waren toegevoegd aan de Gansstraat; je kunt dus meteen kijken hoe dat eruit ziet in iD (de kaartbewerker achter osm.org)

groet,
Lachgast
Sanniu (2022-09-28 12:49:51+00:00): Hi, the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643656175 is one-way without exit now. Is it really the case?
VictorIE (2023-01-19 21:44:07+00:00): Hi,

If Mullagh Road is a highway=primary, it should be an A-road? What is it's A-road number? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076607018
mueschel (2022-10-15 13:08:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300901225

Was heißt denn "laneyard"?
Protoxenus (2022-10-15 15:49:56+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/c/laneyards
mueschel (2022-10-15 16:20:11+00:00): Was hat der ausgedachte Name eines Youtube-Channels mit einem Spielplatz zu tun?
Protoxenus (2022-10-15 16:28:04+00:00): https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/lanyard?q=lanyard
Protoxenus (2022-10-15 16:28:46+00:00): Rechtschreibfehler, sorry
mueschel (2022-10-15 16:47:34+00:00): Nebenbei, das access-Tag für Hunde ist "dog", nicht "dogs".
Protoxenus (2022-10-15 17:07:52+00:00): Ich schenke dir das "e" und das "s".
canfe (2022-09-23 13:33:23+00:00): Ma un singolo edificio non può essere taggato come multipoligono!
emlaurent (2022-11-19 14:40:42+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai vu que vous aviez rajouté le batiment (Chemin : 1096394717) que j'avais enlevé car il avait été détruit (vu sur place le 18/04/2022). Est-ce qu'il a été reconstruit ? Je ne suis pas retourné sur place depuis mais sur G Street view, on voit toujours la zone en travaux avec une vue de juillet 2022.
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4273621,4.5854937,3a,75y,77.01h,88.39t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1sBq1pPbfBlzGd1UEtGTkdcQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!9m2!1b1!2i26
Pistouf (2022-11-19 15:26:58+00:00): Bien vu ! Excusez-moi pour l'erreur, j'avais vu sa présence sur le fond de plan "cadastre". C'est supprimé !
emlaurent (2022-11-19 17:50:48+00:00): Merci du retour !
AWaltrick (2022-09-21 00:18:18+00:00): Boa noite!

Porque as estradas foram apagadas?

Att,
AWaltrick (2022-09-21 00:19:20+00:00): porque as estrada foram apagadas?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-21 00:49:29+00:00): Porque foi reportado que você apagou. Então acionei o plugin de reversão nesta sua edição
AWaltrick (2022-09-21 00:56:44+00:00): Desculpe, mas as vias que estou questionando foram as recém desenhadas por mim a poucos dias.
1998alexkane (2022-09-26 11:19:14+00:00): I believe they were tagged correctly before. 

highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=designated, segregated=yes is the tagging reccomended at least on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Miscellaneous

In either case, there is no physical separation between the cycleway and the sidewalk, so I think it's just segregated=yes, and not two separate ways.
BPTT (2022-09-26 14:19:58+00:00): Feel free to revert! If memory serves from an in-person visit, there is separation between the cycle tracks and roadway with curbs, and there is also separation between the footway and cycletrack by a continuous, parallel grass strip. The cycletracks do not appear to be compulsory, and the the cycletracks are signalized at Connell.
1998alexkane (2022-09-30 08:18:57+00:00): Luckily Bing finally has some new streetside images, so this is very easy to verify :D It's definitely flush, and its essentially just a change of surface.

The cycle tracks which will be going up on Walnut, however, look like they'll be separated by a grass strip and those should definitely be separate ways when they get built.
ovruni (2022-09-21 12:02:29+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado una dirección y se ha agregado un banco con nombre que tiene el valor de coordenada(algo que anteriormente también note por Cañete), con respecto a los edificios de apartamentos que se han eliminado para redibujar por favor revisar en caso tengan etiquetas que puedan perderse.
Saludos
Syl (2022-09-20 20:43:41+00:00): Bonjour, zone résidentielle semblait plus adapté que zone de garages. Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Minie-Mini (2022-09-20 20:53:43+00:00): Les gens du voyage occupent de façon très occasionnelle ce lieu. Ce n'est pas une zone résidentielle mais juste un lieu de passage où la nature a ses droits une majeure partie de l''année
Syl (2022-09-21 07:33:56+00:00): Je pense que même si c'est occasionnel ça reste une zone à usage résidentiel, précisé par le tag residential=halting_site que vous avez laissé.
En tout cas garages n'est pas adapté, il n'y a aucun bâtiment de garage à cet endroit.
Syl (2022-09-21 14:10:40+00:00): Et cela n'a rien à voir avec les aires touristiques pour les camping-cars, landuse=residential reste bien le plus adapté.
canfe (2022-09-23 13:18:14+00:00): Il multipoligono è taggato come fenced che è deprecato, manca l'inner.
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-05 16:03:57+00:00): Olá danctc,
Tudo bem? então eu vi que está adicionando edificios pelo RapID peço que preste mais atenção pela qualidade dos dados e se os edificios não estão sobrepostos 
Obrigado!
atsuki (2022-09-21 08:11:15+00:00): Mapa ewidencyjna dalej wskazuje budynek.  Nie istenieje już budynek, czy sklep?
Huba2845 (2022-09-21 08:33:53+00:00): Nie istnieje zakładu w tym budynku
Falsernet (2022-09-20 21:21:57+00:00): + updated access tags on cycleways
Gh0stz0x (2022-09-21 04:48:02+00:00): Per questioni di licenze non si copia mai da altre mappe che non abbiano mai dato autorizzazione scritta. Ma l'aggiustamento lo hai fatto ad occhio?
alesarrett (2022-09-21 06:34:50+00:00): Non è che manchi autorizzazione, è esplicitamente vietato in questo caso: https://www.geoplan.it/termini-e-condizioni
"Proprietà Intellettuale  
-----------------------
Il Servizio ed i suoi contenuti originali (esclusi i Contenuti forniti dagli utenti), le caratteristiche e le funzionalità sono e rimarranno di esclusiva proprietà di Geoplan S.r.l. e dei suoi licenziatari. Il Servizio è protetto dalle leggi sul copyright, sul marchio ed altre leggi sia di Italy che di Paesi stranieri. I nostri marchi e simboli distintivi non possono essere usati in connessione a nessun prodotto o servizio senza il consenso scritto di Geoplan S.r.l.."
alainc993 (2022-09-21 11:36:28+00:00): Ah, grazie! Diciamo che avevo preso spunto da quel sito, ma le due mappe linkate qua sopra non erano troppo precise, quindi poi ho sistemato guardando come sono disegnate sul sito della cartografia dell'agenzia delle entrate (change id: 126441211 )
marczoutendijk (2022-11-28 19:36:14+00:00): Hi,

You forgot to add any valid tag to this building. I fixed it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129489548
marczoutendijk (2022-11-28 19:39:46+00:00): You also have added almost 900 buildings with the value: building=Unspecified.
That is not a valid key. Use building=yes instead.
I fixed them all.
Watch out! tag values are in lower case.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129489357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129489548
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129489408
Zalitoar (2022-09-21 03:35:17+00:00): El comentario quedó mal por error: eliminé la etiqueta name porque tenía "casa de Carlo" como valor.
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126414506, 126420493, 126420816, 126421384, 126421859, 126422554, 126422899, 126423298, 126423569, 126423848, 126424235, 126424362, 126424993, 126425344.
Ale_Zena_IT (2022-09-21 06:48:26+00:00): Hello,
welcome to OSM.
Please, do not copy form any source if you are not sure has a compatible license.
Borders are a sensible matters; I warmly suggest to start contributing to OSM with simpler objects.

Cheers,
  Alessandro
alainc993 (2022-09-21 11:39:37+00:00): Hi, thank you! Yesterday I changed lots of small stuff, but due to the snapping, I messed up (before this change) a bit the borders, so this is my attempt to fix it.
Btw, the license of this link is `CC-BY 4.0`. Is that ok? Anyway, I would say that my changes here are "inspired" by that link and not copied.
Ale_Zena_IT (2022-09-21 11:51:55+00:00): Well, the license is OdBl, similar to a CC-BY-SA https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
oba510 (2022-09-21 01:46:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.  Is this part of a class assignment?  

Most of what you have added in your recent changesets has already been mapped, and much more accurately than what you added.  Unfortunately I had to revert all of your changes.  Please check to make sure that what you're adding doesn't already exist before uploading to the live database. Thank you.
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 17:56:51+00:00): Ciao. queste modifiche hanno danneggaito la route della Vua Aurelia tra Pescia ROmana e Tarquinia (https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=21563)
frasty (2022-09-21 21:09:45+00:00): Ciao,
ho visto, grazie. Non mi ero preoccupato delle route perché credevo di aver soltanto modificato dei segmenti senza rimuovere/aggiungere nulla. Cerco di ripristinare al più presto.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-21 10:43:18+00:00): Hello. Can you elaborate on this change? These are the roads actually used by all buses at Vilnius bus station. If service=driveway is for some reason not ok, you should change it to a better value for service, not remove it. Lithuanian mappers will go through missing service tags and add driveway again. No service tag is worse than service=driveway.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-20 23:41:24+00:00): For more detail see the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125817813 - ignore the misconceptions about how rights of way work in England and Wales at the top of the thread but instead read the "things that might have been mistagged" further down.
JayTurnr (2024-05-20 16:05:15+00:00): Hiya, what is the NA references on roads used here? Should they perhaps be on more specific tags?
abakus_uploader (2022-09-21 22:31:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 17:32:32+00:00): lembrando que não se coloca nome genérico nos elementos como nome apenas como "trilha", "escola" etc como fez aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420885362
AWaltrick (2022-10-23 18:01:09+00:00): boa tarde Erick!

Ok, perfeito. Será feito nas próximas.

Att,
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 17:46:02+00:00): removido
mariotomo (2022-10-01 17:03:37+00:00): hola. cuál es la fuente de la información de extensión, ubicación, nombre de estos landuse=residential? Santa Lucía no se ve en Maxar; del Río sí se ve, pero con otra extensión.
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 23:11:18+00:00): El día que lo visite, quede con ganas de mudarme, se ve muy bonito el proyecto, lo unico que no me gusta, es que esta a orillas del río.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-11 22:49:33+00:00): these buildings aren't even remotely square nor do they match aerial imagery.  I have cleaned it up.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-11 22:54:46+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134793156

Additionally, golf course has gone out of business.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-25 00:31:58+00:00): Hiciste algunas cosas mal aquí, primero borraste una iglesia y creaste otra con el mismo nombre pero con menos información, borrando la historia del objeto. En segundo lugar, pegaron el área de la iglesia a otros caminos, lo que se considera una mala práctica en este proyecto.
Mauro Alessandro Izarra Perez (2022-09-25 00:41:37+00:00): La forma de la iglesia era incorrecta. Estaba colocada toda la parcela como un edificio y no era la planta exacta. Respecto a los demas errores, se tomaran en cuenta y se corregiran.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-25 00:53:41+00:00): Pegaste esta forma a las vías, esto es incorrecto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096438696
zefoozef (2024-09-13 07:27:46+00:00): iaroana, le passage du ruisseau https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662224482 en tunnel / layer=-1 semble étonnant, est-ce voulu?
merci et bonnes continuations!
mottiger (2023-08-21 14:48:12+00:00): Dear DesiFunday,

Thank you very much for your contribution to OSM. It seems like you add really useful information, but sadly you also destroyed some important features.
This water area has completely vanished from the map.

I will do my best to restore it and keep your information in the database as well.

Cheers,
mottiger
mottiger (2023-08-21 14:49:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140186313
oba510 (2022-09-21 01:44:45+00:00): Hi, is this part of a class assignment?  

Most of what you have added in your recent changesets has already been mapped, and much more accurately than what you added.  Unfortunately I had to revert all of your changes.  Please check to make sure that what you're adding doesn't already exist before uploading to the live database. Thank you.
jimkats (2022-10-13 18:30:24+00:00): Βλέπω σε κάποια σημεία ότι έχεις μετακινήσεις δρόμους όχι όμως εξ' ολοκλήρου + ότι έχεις προσθέσει πολλά nodes πάνω τους χωρίς λόγο. Ένα παράδειγμα το https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154960549 Με το Bing/Maxar (αφού αυτή την στιγμή έχουν ίδιο και on-point imagery) είναι misaligned, το οποίο με κάνει να διερωτώμαι κατά πόσο όντως κάνεις διόρθωση οδικών αξόνων.
nevw (2022-09-21 00:36:59+00:00): ...also updated tags for Beerburrum West State Forest
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
vsahith (2022-09-21 04:09:44+00:00): Added a path as per Driver feedback
zluuzki (2023-10-15 11:03:40+00:00): Are you sure that SR 58 still goes through Chattanooga?

There are
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3507391
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3507392
which say it dosen't.

I also looked at streetview images, and pretty much the section you added to the relation is not signed as being SR 58.
tomservo (2023-10-15 15:14:58+00:00): I've both personally driven most of this road and researched, and yes this is ambiguous. Segments like Amnicola definitely aren't signed but TN does have a lot of unsigned secondary alignments so that's not definitive.

I followed the route still marked on the latest TIGER data (https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/tigerweb/). FWIW, I noticed that most other commercial mappers likewise show an identical alignment, possibly also based on the federal TIGER data.

However, it's also true that the state classification maps for Hamilton County (https://www.tn.gov/tdot/driver-how-do-i/look-at-or-order-state-maps/maps/annual-average-daily-traffic-maps1.html) do not list any alignment of SR 58 through downtown Chattanooga.

I attempted to reach out to the state GIS office some time ago for clarification but received no response. I'm going to try again to reach someone there. Thanks
zluuzki (2023-10-15 17:56:57+00:00): No worries. I just saw those notes and looked what I could do, weather those roads are now tagged as SR 58 or not... I don't really care, that's not my area of intrest.

Just for your information, there is an "unsigned_ref=*" key, which might or might not fit better - but I'm not judging that
tomservo (2023-11-21 20:47:22+00:00): I received explanation from TDOT for the actual downtown alignment which I've documented on the Wikipedia talk page for SR 58 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tennessee_State_Route_58

The following changeset attempts to adjust everything accordingly https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144299463