piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 08:33:30+00:00): Hi chenluna,
i have fixed the alignment as building polygoons overlapping with service roads
way 558728493 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102978224.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102773820
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 23:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103156698 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 23:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103156698 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 10:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108154083 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:41:21+00:00): Hello sava eskimo,
Like with the other one, could you please provide some evidence that "MTB Maraton Evolution" is actually signed on the ground here?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:47:37+00:00): If you think of signs as signposts, they do not exist. If they are necessary, you can delete the relation
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:52:23+00:00): I would request that you delete it, actually!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 12:59:55+00:00): Hi! To remove the highway-tag from an existing walkway, cycleway or corridor object is something I strongly reccomend you not to do in the future. This will prevent routing through the object in question eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=60.17223%2C24.94049%3B60.17113%2C24.94070
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 13:01:24+00:00): I changed this back now so our HSL journeyplanner (https://reittiopas.hsl.fi/etusivu) also can find it's way through this corridor in the future. Greetings Markku Huotari, HSL
Kustaa65 (2022-03-25 13:06:47+00:00): Sorry for this. Won't do again!
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 13:21:40+00:00): No problem. We all make mistakes. I just thought I'd let you know so you can avoid this one in the future. :-)
Kustaa65 (2022-03-25 13:25:32+00:00): I was just checking the changes I had made, you might want to take a look at this also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122595269
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 13:31:49+00:00): Yep! Same problem there. I changed this one as well. Thanks for the hint. / M
Kustaa65 (2022-03-25 13:36:10+00:00): OK, good. No more sins for me. At least as far as Openstreet is considered. :)
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 13:44:09+00:00): No, we're all good for now. :-) By the way this is as far as I understand the "right way" to use the indoor=corridor tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926166295. I believe it's supposed to be an area object intended as a supplement to the highway=corridor line object to visualise the actual geometrical extent of the corridor. Thank you for making this mistake in the first place - made me learn new tagging rules as well.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 10:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108154083 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 08:18:34+00:00): Hii NINAS_M2,
i have fixed the alignment as building polygoons overlapping with residential roads way 114913465 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102977102.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102774494
Becky Candy (2021-05-10 15:24:53+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102774504
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
Hadi Omid (2021-04-13 08:04:44+00:00): سلام وقت بخیر
یکسری مسیر پیاده رسم کرده بودم که خیابان کارون رو به بوستان متصل میکرد
همه رو حذف کردید
دلیل خاصی داشته؟
HamiiidAA (2021-04-13 08:19:50+00:00): سلام وقت شما هم بخیر
نود‌ها رو میخواستم پاک کنم که اونا هم پاک شدن و حقیقتش با خودم گفتم چون برای پیاده هست و نه ماشین و در مسیریابی هم تاثیری نداره و شلوغ میکنه نقشه رو، چون اینجوری باید کلی پیاده رو بکشیم، نکشیدمشون دوباره
Hadi Omid (2021-04-13 09:18:50+00:00): توجه داشته باشید که یکی از کاربردهای نقشه، مسیریابی برای خودرو هست، مسیر عابر پیاده، مسیر دوچرخه، حمل و نقل عمومی مثل مینی بوس که تو کیش هست هم بودنش ضروری و مهم هستش
در مورد پیاده رو که فرمودید، معمولا چون مسیر پیاده رو و خیابان مشترک هست، رسم جداگانه پیاده رو لزومی نداره ولی مواردی که فقط عابر پیاده میتونه تردد داشته باشه وجودش ضروری هست و نباید حذف کرد.
ممنون
HamiiidAA (2021-04-13 09:25:22+00:00): بیشتر توجه میکنم که این اشتباه رو نکنم
سپاس از تذکرتون
آقا امید عزیز، من هدفم کمک هست برای اصلاح نقشه کیش و استفاده کاربردی مسافرانی که با خوردوی شخصیشون میان کیش
باز اگه احساس میکنید که به هر دلیل دوست ندارید و با اعتمادی به کارم ندارید، مشکلی نیست و دیگه ویرایش نمکینم. هرطور دستور بدید
Hadi Omid (2021-04-13 09:28:00+00:00): ویرایش های شما به عنوان کسی که ساکن کیش هست قطعا مفید خواهد بود
مواردی که میگم صرفا برای بهبود ویرایش ها هست
بنده همچین جسارتی خدمت شما نمیکنم
HamiiidAA (2021-04-13 09:38:58+00:00): شما بزرگوارید
نه من از جهت منفی نگفتم و ناراحتی

100% تجربه و پیشکسوت بودن شکا جای بحثی نیست
مواردی که گوشزد کردید رو رعایت میکنم
استفادم از نقشه گوگل صرف ترسیم بهتر خیابان ها هست چون تصویرش به روزتر هست و از اطلاعاتش استفاده ندارم
من به دفعات دیدم راننده های مسافر دارن ار نرم افزارهای مسیریاب استفاده میکنن و دیدم که ورود ممنوع و خلاف هم زیاد میان، دلیلشم خراب و ناقص و اشتباه بودن نقشه ها هست
حتی الان که اسنپ هم اومده، نقشه اسنپ هم کلی ایراد داره و اگه قدیمی کیش نباشی که اسامی رو بلد باشی، خیلی سخت میشه با نرم افزار مسیریاب اسنپ کار کرد
اینارم جهت آگاهیتون گفتم که در جریان باشید
ارادتمند
Hadi Omid (2021-04-13 09:56:42+00:00): بله قطعا همونطور که فرمودید با اومدن اسنپ و مسافرانی که خودروی شخصی دارن و به روز نبودن مسیرها، نیاز بیشتری حس میشه برای تکمیل نقشه و قطعا ویرایش های شما با ارزش خواهد بود
Villelmo (2021-04-12 18:37:02+00:00): Banco bac y banpro
TrekClimbing (2021-04-16 19:32:54+00:00): Hi Mike

Grave yards? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929536561
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929536571
MichaelCollinson (2021-04-17 06:17:04+00:00): Thanks. Whoops! Fixed.
TrekClimbing (2021-04-17 08:55:29+00:00): Cheers :)
TrekClimbing (2021-07-18 22:12:00+00:00): Hi Mike. Just spotted 3 more near Guiseley Wells. 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19wO
Hope that link works
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 10:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108154083 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
abakus_uploader (2021-04-12 22:33:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 07:43:14+00:00): Hi NINAS_M2,
i have removed footway because that is not leading to any destination and it was overlapping with service highway way 929540443 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102973746.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102775617
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 07:17:56+00:00): Hi maning,
i have fixed the alignment as building polygon crossing on residential highway way 929542176 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102972584.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102776081
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
mrcn (2021-04-19 17:38:55+00:00): Coś tu nie tak poszło - droga i ścieżka rowerowa poprzez bloki (np. przez Andriollego 59)
cyton (2021-04-18 06:10:33+00:00): I think you used the esri imagery for this edit.
Those have some warp to them (since they are taken at an angle, not perfectly straight down), so I use the "Geoportal Berlin / TrueDOP20RGB (2020)" imagery made by Berlin.
You can find a lot of resources here: https://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/index.jsp
info about the truedop imagery here:https://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/berlin/service_intern.jsp?id=k_luftbild2020_true_rgb@senstadt&type=WMS

I think iD should have them available as an option for you in the background images tab (for Berlin at least and some parts around it).

The advantage is that buildings should be "straightened" and the warp removed. several images were taken from different positions of the same building, and using data on where buildings are then these truedop imagery are computed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102776533
tnayini (2021-04-20 02:39:51+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits and providing the valuable information. we are adding roads based on  aerial images present in OSM  . I have not modified the buildings as we do not have ground data to validate the buildings. it can be helpful if the community can go ahead and make the necessary changes with the local knowledge. thanks for the information regarding "Geoportal Berlin / TrueDOP20RGB (2020)". I will make sure to prioritize this imagery in this vicinity. always happy to learn from the community.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-16 07:03:51+00:00): Please stop making such large changesets. This disrupts mappers in the area.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-12 14:04:27+00:00): Hello linlien and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Something seems to have gone wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929546302 here - the building is overlapping another one.
Can you please ask whoever is supervising you to email data@openstreetmap.org so that we can help them?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
sanddune94 (2021-04-12 11:06:49+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping, we don't gave a view o understand is this a park and also it is a building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102776822
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 18:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104074571 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 06:28:38+00:00): Hi mapper,
i have fixed the alignment ,as building polygons overlapping with residnetial highways
way 114794219,way 105894270,way 114794122
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102776952.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102776952
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 10:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108154083 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-04-12 06:48:46+00:00): Accidentally reused old changeset comment. Meant to note that OSIP sat imagery was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103662279 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads) are still problematic.
LordGarySugar (2025-04-24 15:46:40+00:00): Is 52.7190167, -0.6371758 a real housenumber?!
BCNorwich (2025-04-24 16:47:21+00:00): Crikey, that was 4 years ago, I've fixed the numbers. Thanks for letting me know.

Regards Bernard.
LordGarySugar (2025-04-24 17:42:40+00:00): That's a shame, I was hoping it was real!
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-12 07:25:12+00:00): Good day yuehtsai, please always make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new roads. This way you will avoid adding duplicates of roads that already exist in the database. Also please have a look at the definitions of motorway and residential roads. I've reverted this changeset.
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-12 07:51:09+00:00): Good day gillhsu. The road link that you added (way 929553066) does not exist. Please only connect roads when they're clearly visible on aerial imagery. As for way 929553067, this would be better tagged as service than unclassified. There are detailled descriptions of all highway tags on the OSM wiki. Happy mapping!
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 06:10:17+00:00): Hi mapper,
i have changed classification from unclassified to residential and service way 929553066,way 929553067 Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102967760
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102777975
MTB FORIS (2021-04-13 14:54:59+00:00): There is a way. Forest road, but well healed. I went through this path 20 and a half years ago ... You need to return the erased path, because it exists. I went through and recorded the GPX and added it and drew a map.
So I will return again this time to OSM.
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 15:43:16+00:00): The road may have existed once, at the moment it is not possible to go that way.
And this will be reported
MTB FORIS (2021-04-13 14:55:23+00:00): It 's OK!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:57:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Dawid2849 (2021-04-12 09:14:39+00:00): Dlaczego zmeniłeś waterway=ditch na waterway=river?
jarema90 (2021-04-13 09:16:43+00:00): Masz rację, zmieniam na ditch. Swoją drogą to wymaga uporządkowania na OSM (vide "rzeka" Siennica na płd od Rejki)
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 05:36:43+00:00): Hi ChunKueiwang,
i have removed overlapping footway on residential road way 929557114
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102965867.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102778775
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 05:30:45+00:00): Hi mapper,
i have removed duplicated highways way 959557245
kindly check with  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102964269
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102778787
Mordechai23 (2022-02-07 17:34:02+00:00): dodajesz tracki z highway=compacted i grade1. To się wyklucza
ravali_78 (2021-04-16 12:45:52+00:00): Hi Jimlim69,
i have fixed the alignment of dragged node on residential highway node 4273006006 and removed floating motorway
way 929558371 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103060848.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102779001
ToniE (2021-04-12 08:06:14+00:00): Servus map per,

können ways in einer pedestrian-Area highway=path sein?

Meiner Menung nach sollten diese auch highway=pedestrian sein, unabhängig davon ob man noch ein bicycle=designated dran mappen möchte.

Eigentlich bräuchte es die Wege innerhalb der Plätze nicht, wenn die Router/Navis denn über Plätze navigieren könnten. Sie existieren eigentlich nur, um über die Plätze navigieren zu können, sollten/können also "versteckt" bleiben, auf Karten nicht unbedingt sichtbar sein, oder?

Ich bin allerdings auch gegen eine Pedestrianitis, d.h. gehen das übertriebene Mappen jeder etwas größeren Fläche als Fußgängerzone (zu der meiner Meinung nach die üblichen Schilder gehören).

VG
Toni
map per (2021-04-12 08:55:37+00:00): Die Fläche im Olympiapark sind nicht als Fußgängerzone beschildert und wären damit eigentlich area:highway=path oder?

Das normale Wege innerhalb einer Fußgängerfläche eingezeichnet werden gibt es z.B. am Götheplatz. Das sind aber auch alles Bürgersteige und keine Fußgängerzonen.
ToniE (2021-04-12 09:12:07+00:00): Mit area:highway=... würden die Flächen von der Standardkarte verschwinden. Der Aufschrei wäre groß.

Alternative: higway=... und area=yes, dann wüeden die Flächen entspr. dargestellt.

Am Goetheplatz (ein gutes Beispiel für übertriebenes pedestrian-Mapping) sind erschwerend noch U-Bahn-Zugänge, die mit highway=pedestrian statt path in der Luft schweben würden.

Also: mein Ansatz, pedestrian nur dort wo entspr. Schilder sind ist auch eher dogmatisch als pragmatisch zu sehen.
Als so ganz schlüssig sehe ich meine Argumente dann auch wieder nicht. 
Mein CS-Comment ist also eher als Meinungsäußerung zu verstehen und wollte mal deine Meinung hören.

Gruß
Toni
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 04:59:59+00:00): Hi rextsai,
i have fixed the alignment ,as building polygon overlapping with residnetial road way 32869521
Kindly check withhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102963662
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102780163
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 14:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108945275 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-13 08:25:05+00:00): check!
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-12 14:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102810243 where the changeset comment is: