piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jacek79 (2023-02-24 22:56:22+00:00): Wenn man's wirklich ganz genau nimmt, ja. Wie wird das in OSM sonst bei Alleen gemacht?
GerdP (2023-02-25 06:21:06+00:00): Ich mappe Baumreihen da, wo sie in der Realität sind. Also vom ersten bis zum letzten Baum. So wird es ja auch im Wiki beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Anatural%3Dtree_row
Zur Zeit sieht man die Bäume am besten auf den Luftbildern von Mapbox. 
Ich bin sonst eher südlich im Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest aktiv, dort sind unterdessen auch fast alle Straßen und Wasserwege von Flächen (landuse=*, natural=*) getrennt. Das ist bzw. war aber sehr viel Arbeit.
Jacek79 (2023-02-26 17:39:06+00:00): Geändert! Passt das jetzt?
GerdP (2023-02-26 17:47:54+00:00): Nö. Baumreihen sollte man nicht mit anderen Dingen verkleben, eine Ausnahme mögen Wald-Gebiete sein.
Ich unterbreche Baumreihen auch an Straßeneinmündungen oder Bächen. Wenn dann nur noch einzelne Bäume bleiben, dann ist dort eben keine Baumreihe, sondern evtl. einzelne natural=tree
Mit den Luftbildern von Mapbox sieht man die einzelnen Bäume z.Z. recht gut.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-27 08:10:45+00:00): Hallo,
ist die Straße nur gesperrt oder aufgerissen/abgebaut?
vg
DCA (2019-03-27 08:18:58+00:00): Komplett Baustelle, Zugang für externe quasi nicht möglich.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-27 08:20:57+00:00): Quasi nicht möglich? was den nun? Ist vor Ort Z250 oder Z600-30?
DCA (2019-03-27 08:29:24+00:00): Z600-30 kann ich nicht googeln. Z250 trifft es, Straße nur noch für Bauarbeiter betretbar. Der einseitige Bürgersteig ist weiterhin nutzbar.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-27 08:33:28+00:00): Schau mal hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_von_2013_bis_2017

Z250 bdeutet für OSM das setzen von vehicle=no, dadurch sind nur Fahrzeuge(inkl. Fahrrad) für den Weg gesperrt. 
Habe die Änderung gerade vollzogen.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-22 03:34:59+00:00): Reverted by DWG for adding fictitious or duplicated information: changeset/135214744
robert (2019-06-02 12:13:00+00:00): Did you mean to remove the name "Malham Close" in this edit? It broke a match against OS Locator: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=477237
champs-libres (2019-04-24 18:59:12+00:00): Bonjour strebelle, 

Félicitations pour vos ajouts dans les environs de Brugelette! Je vois ici que le sentier entre la rue du Berceau et la rue de la Crampe a été nommé "Voie piétonne". Or, le nom est plutôt un nom donné à un sentier ou indiqué sur une plaque. A moins que ce soit le cas avec ce sentier, je suggérerai d'enlever le nom.

Happy mapping, 

Julien M de Champs-Libres
maraf24 (2019-04-01 10:48:28+00:00): Please don't remove proper names from POIs.
Reverted.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-27 09:28:30+00:00): Hallo
zur Info: Ich habe dieses CS revertet, da der Grundriss nicht stimmte oder es so aus sah wie ein freistehendes Gebäude. Hab es nun nach HH DK5 angepasst.
vg
DCA (2019-03-27 09:50:32+00:00): Bin nicht sicher, aber geht es hierbei um die Silcherstraße 28? In dem Haus wohnt meine Mutter. Die 23 gibt es seit Jahren nicht mehr, alles abgerissen, stattdessen der von mir länglich eingezeichnete Neubau. VG
ma-rt-in (2019-03-27 10:05:13+00:00): Ja um dieses geht es, es ist ja schließlich das einzige bearbeitet Gebäude in dem CS. Ich habe mich vlt nicht klar ausgedrückt: Deine Künste den Grundriss zu zeichnen fand ich nicht so schön und habe es mal nachgezeichnet. Die Nummer 23 habe ich dabei nicht wiederhergestellt.
viloan (2019-03-26 21:29:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-04-01 07:47:41+00:00): If the road is open then the construction=* should be removed....
mueschel (2019-04-02 13:41:17+00:00): Hi,
you added several tags like these:
Código DANE
Código Dane
These are not documented, what do they mean?

Jan
Andrea Musuruane (2019-03-28 08:44:49+00:00): Ciao. Se ricordo bene, il tag ref:mise è legato all'operator. Quindi se cambia quest'ultimo anche ref:mise non è più corretto. Forse vale la pena rimuoverlo in attesa di un nuovo import? Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2019-03-26 22:18:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Herr Kramer (2019-04-04 12:44:11+00:00): Hallo SennaHB, auf welcher Grundlage wurde von Dir die B6 von highway:primary zu highway:motorway geändert? (Heiß unter anderem jetzt auch Autobahn B6, was sachlich falsch wäre)

 - Sie war laut Verkehrsministerium und Landesstraßenbaubehörde am AK Bernburg beginnend richtig, wie sie zuvor angelegt war. -

Gruß 
Herr Kramer
LSBB
SennaHB (2019-04-05 21:02:46+00:00): Hallo Herr Kramer,

das Tagging als Autobahn erfolgte aufgrund der tatsächlichen Beschilderung vor Ort (Zeichen 330.1 und 330.2 StVO), die für den Verkehrsteilnehmer relevant ist.
Die OSM ist nunmal keine amtliche Karte.
Die straßenbaurechtliche Widmung ist aber durch das ref-Tag berücksichtigt.

Ähnliche Fälle sind bspw. A 44/B 1 westl. AK Dortmund/Unna, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.5121/7.6202 oder
die B 28 südlich Ulm, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/48.3479/10.0307

MfG
SennaHB
eggie (2019-03-26 22:25:11+00:00): Mocht het hier in de BAG (administratie Kadaster) nog niet kloppen dan kun je een terugmelding doen. De import vindt namelijk periodiek plaats vanuit het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
Kaartje-verbeteren (2019-03-26 22:58:01+00:00): De Bag gegevens klopten wel. Daar zie je nu dat huisnummer 166 drie panden omvat. 

Waar komt trouwens het pictogrammetje vandaan met de computer erop? Welke gegevens betreft dat?
eggie (2019-03-26 23:07:32+00:00): shop=computer geeft dat symbool. 
Rendering duurt lang bij  shoptags. . 
Gr Eggie
mueschel (2019-03-29 09:31:20+00:00): Hi,
you invented several new, wheelchair related tags here:

wheelchair accessible
wheelchar accessible	
wheelchari accessible

Please note that the correct tag is just "wheelchair". Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Thanks
Jan
viloan (2019-03-26 22:24:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-03-27 08:08:06+00:00): Dag ZdeH.. Het is beter om niet de adresnodes helemaal te verwijderen.
Haal alleen er af dat niet van toepassing is.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-27 08:15:02+00:00): In dit geval was het een duplikaat. No problem..
BCNorwich (2019-03-28 07:27:24+00:00): Hi, Just wanted to let you know that some of your new grass areas overlap each other and some have self intersecting outlines.

You have joined most of the areas to highway center lines, even dragging some highways out of original alignment. Joining areas to highway centre lines makes it very difficult to see and correct some of the mistakes. If a grass area extends over a path (the path surface being grass) then the area can be drawn over the path not joined to it.

Regards Bernard.
user_9517839 (2019-04-02 12:09:33+00:00): Have I corrected the mistake ?
flother (2019-03-27 11:13:58+00:00): Hi birdlawyer,

I reverted these changes in changeset 68566736, but only because you changed the Dalvík–Hræisey ferry route so it branches in the water. I think that this will cause trouble for routing engines.

From the OSM wiki: "The ferry route must not branch in the water, so it must always be drawn to the ferry dock. This is important for routing to work correctly".

But if you think I've made I've made a mistake in reverting this, please let me know!
birdlawyer (2019-03-27 23:43:53+00:00): The existing geometry for the route between Dalvik and Hrisey did not reach the ferry terminal/dock before connecting to another ferry route (node 619959768) so I modified the route to end at the terminal.  The reversion made it so both routes now connect in the water (node 4504514586) and does not reach the terminal.
flother (2019-03-28 12:44:52+00:00): You're right, sorry, I've changed the Dalvík–Hrísey ferry routes back. Now they both connect directly to the terminal again.

It was the ferry route that finishes in Seyðisfjörður that had the branch in the water (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68566736), because there are two ferry terminal nodes there. I've left that so it only connects to one and there's no branch in the water.
birdlawyer (2019-03-28 22:56:52+00:00): Thanks for clarifying the concern with the Seyðisfjörður route. What about using a route relation to connect to the separate pedestrian and vehicle entrances at the same terminal? This is a common way to represent ferries where pedestrians and vehicles use different terminals.
flother (2019-03-29 09:54:09+00:00): I don't have any experience with ferry routes via relations but if that would allow driving and walking routing to use different entrances/exits to the ferry, that would be really nice. As long as routing engines can still use the ferry route, I'm happy :)
birdlawyer (2019-03-29 20:47:03+00:00): Here’s the completed route relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1389543).
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-27 21:15:08+00:00): Hello,

What is the intended purpose of the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679612843 which you described as parking=lane? Your edit summary says "rough postal area of M5H" but this is not tagged on the area itself. If it is the postal area, what is the source of the information?

Thanks,
--Jarek
SarahW98 (2020-10-20 03:43:54+00:00): oops made this a year ago while trying to do an assignment. it can be deleted.
ລາວ (2019-03-26 23:48:21+00:00): Please don't tag outer ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679615395
nevw (2019-03-27 02:44:33+00:00): Hi
I expect that amenity=townhall should be changed unless your club house is located at a Town Hall.
One of the 'Recommended combinations' shown here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club might be more suitable.
jaap de vries (2019-03-27 13:14:09+00:00): Je hebt hier de Nederlandse naam dubbel toegevoegd, 1x toevoegen is voldoende. Een Engelse naam toevoegen hoeft niet tenzij dat op een bord of gevel staat bij gebouwen, bij natuurgebieden hoeft dat niet.
interdite (2019-04-01 15:50:52+00:00): Dear Mapmaker,

are you aware that you've broken the coastline with this edit? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68567965
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-04-01 18:39:39+00:00): No but the history has shown it was fixed by another mapper
mueschel (2019-03-27 14:00:59+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "Building=Yes" on 200 objects. Could you check this and correct the spelling to use lowercase letters only?

Thanks
Jan
SarahW98 (2020-10-20 03:43:28+00:00): oops made this a year ago while trying to do an assignment. it can be deleted.
eggie (2019-03-27 07:33:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Dit lijkt me niet een park in de tuin van Aalscholverstraat 8. Je bijdrage zal worden verwijderd. Wat was je bedoeling?
Edits van startende mappers worden gevolgd.
Dit was je bijdrage.. wellicht een vergissing?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68568263
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-27 07:52:27+00:00): Wanneer je doelt op het braakliggende terrein aan de Hogenkamp waar altijd het paasvuur is en het is nu een echt park dan kan daar een los vlak worden getekend leisure=park met naam. Een leisure=park wordt dan getekend over alle landuse heen. Het is een transparant.
Maar is dat park al gereed of nog een plan?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-27 07:52:54+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #68575573
NotJim99 (2019-03-28 03:08:39+00:00): Hello, you seem to have accidentally tagged Lake Michigan as a school in this changeset. I went ahead and fixed that for you. Please be more careful editing in the future.
Supaplex (2019-03-27 06:39:25+00:00): https://overpass.nchc.org.tw/overpass-turbo/
應該是這裡資料跑出來就是舊的，先前匯入的沒有在上面
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68568499
jeroenhuijben (2019-03-27 01:41:44+00:00): per ongeluk ook wijziging in openlucht museum in deze set geplaatst:
Brugje over sloot.
viloan (2019-03-27 01:11:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
nevw (2019-03-27 02:54:50+00:00): Hi
the Digitalglobe and Esri imagery show extensive parking at the prison. You have deleted all but a small portion. Is this mapped correctly?
BSVS (2019-03-27 02:57:40+00:00): Currently Mapping out the correct car park locations. The Old map showed carparking all the way up to the road, however this is scrub type land. the car park starts further down.
nevw (2019-03-27 02:59:28+00:00): Ok thanks.
jaap de vries (2019-03-27 13:02:36+00:00): Het vlot heeft geen adres, je hebt deze wel toegevoegd, waarom?
jeroenhuijben (2019-03-27 13:06:31+00:00): Bij nader inzien lijkt me dat niet nodig.
Ik zag het als horende bij bij de boerderij.
viloan (2019-03-27 02:06:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mariotomo (2021-05-25 21:04:25+00:00): Hola Didiel.  gracias por añadir áreas naturales.  cuando quieras, te se apoya para mejorar tu estilo de mapeo, para mejor integrar tus contribuciones a lo ya mapeado.
SD Mapman (2019-03-27 02:35:10+00:00): Will add the others when I have more time
muralito (2019-04-08 17:43:32+00:00): Hola Robert.

¿Que intentaste hacer en este cambio?
No se si fue intencionalmente o no, pero eliminaste el nodo que representaba a Asuncion.
woodpeck (2019-04-09 18:44:34+00:00): The changeset has been completely reverted becuause it looked like vandalism.
viloan (2019-03-27 02:47:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-26 12:50:31+00:00): Hello pittrichimica,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap a year ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679630676 was added with a "source=Google" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
pittrichimica (2020-08-29 14:14:24+00:00): Dear Andy,

thanks for your comment, however I am extremely surprised by it, even slightly shocked.

When editing in Indonesia 1-2 years ago, I *exclusively* relied on aerial imagery available by Bing or Mapbox and *never* on anything from Google. Neither did I add such a tag. I am of course aware since the day I started contributing to OSM that proprietary data must not be used for contributing.

I am a hobby mapper located in Europe who either uses aerial imagery in OSM or local knowledge/survey, so I feel somewhat offended by the above allegation.

You say that there was a source=Google tag on the above way. However, it has been deleted and I can not find the alleged tag anymore.

It is 100% impossible that I provided such a tag in all the 9 years that I now contribute to OSM.

Can you provide me with a screenshot or other proof that this tag was actually present?

I am even beginning to wonder whether my account has not been hacked. No idea if such a thing has ever happened in the OSM world...

Thanks for enlightening me,

Tanja
SomeoneElse (2020-08-29 14:28:43+00:00): Hello,
You can see the history at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679630676/history .  I tried to see where that might have inherited tags from another way.
It's good to know that you didn't copy from Google.
pittrichimica (2020-09-02 10:03:44+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I guess you are right about inherited attributes. The way already existed and had a name (which I could never have given from aerial imagery). I assume I extended it, i.e. the trajectory is indeed based on satellite images. However I am not sure whether my predecessor took the name from Google. This might be the critical point.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-03 13:23:03+00:00): Yes - there was a lot of incorrect use of Google Maps very early in the project here.  I'm still digging through the data, messaging those who are still mapping and reviewing whether anything is left from Google for the others (often, there isn't).
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2019-07-21 15:06:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
glglgl (2019-03-28 11:27:59+00:00): I suppose Cerinza is still an administrative entity, so I restored the tag "bounday=administrative" on its relation.
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-29 00:53:35+00:00): Why do you delete large landuse relations, without caring for the member ways, and without refining the landuse?
Dimacn (2019-03-27 06:29:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за улучшение карты OSM. Но, 1. Геометрия (размеры) добавленного вами дома не соответствует действительности. Просьба поправить. 2. В name заносим только официальные названия. Пожалуйста удалите текст из name для дома и школы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  3. Школа отмечается тегами  building=school и amenity=school (если не отмечена территория школы).
viloan (2019-03-27 04:05:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-04 20:44:18+00:00): Hello,

We shouldn't tag future stations as railway=station because that tag is for active stations where you can catch a train. It should probably be something like railway=proposed + proposed=station.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-05-20 16:57:41+00:00): I have retagged those stations in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70448954 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70448805
DavidKewley (2019-03-27 04:57:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thank you for adding this business. While you're editing, please be careful how you use the mouse. I fixed an unintended change you made, where you accidentally dragged a road intersection some distance away, probably while you were trying to move the map on your screen. It's a common issue; just keep an eye out for it so you can avoid it. Thanks!
mueschel (2019-03-31 12:55:22+00:00): Hi,
you added the (new) key "extra_lane" to several bus stops. Did you mean "bus_bay" or "busway"?

Jan
ShadowFoxNixill (2019-03-31 14:17:25+00:00): They're all `bus_bay`s. Will fix in a bit, but this won't be an instant edit. Thanks for pointing out the right tag.
ShadowFoxNixill (2019-03-31 14:43:07+00:00): Fixed. Upon closer inspection, some were actually turning/passing lanes, so I simply removed the tag in those cases.