piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fayor (2018-08-19 13:04:57+00:00): Non è necessario spiegarmi cosa significa "mappare per il rendering", non stai parlando a un ragazzino o a uno che mappa da ieri, conosco la regola ma non la intendo certo come un mantra (come fanno molti). Così come non è necessario spiegarmi che le cose hanno un nome!
Io non mappo per creare la "mia mappa", io mappo per migliorare la mappa, da tutti i punti di vista (quindi anche per il rendering, oltre che per il routing e per qualsivoglia altro fine, se compatibile con la realtà dei luoghi). Se vai a vedere i miei contributi in questi ultimi anni ti potrai accorgere che non ci sono atti di vandalismo ma soltanto, e in minima parte, opinioni discordanti su aspetti sostanzialmente secondari. Non limitarti a citare il blocco dovuto alla edit war, che riguardava tutt'altra faccenda e la Sardegna (non la Sicilia), e anche in quel caso, come avresti potuto verificare prima di parlarne, si trattava soltanto di diversità di opinioni, che hanno riguardato e diviso la maggior parte della comunità italiana.
Ciò premesso, quando mi parli della "local community" dovresti essere più preciso, perché per quanto mi risulta non esiste nessuna comunità organizzata in Sicilia, ma soltanto uno sparuto gruppo di mappatori di cui, senza falsa modestia, io forse sono il più attivo, e i vari contrasti che necessariamente possono sorgere sono sempre stati risolti discutendone da persone civili. 
Non so adesso chi ha fatto queste "segnalazioni" al dwg e a quali specifiche modifiche si riferiscono, sarebbe stato più opportuno confrontarsi con loro piuttosto che fare intervenire il dwg con "consigli" e "minacce". Questo atteggiamento non è certamente di aiuto e incoraggiamento a chi vuole contribuire allo sviluppo del progetto e soprattutto a chi come me da anni, impiegando tempo ed energia, vi contribuisce, col risultato di vedere sminuita di fatto una grandissima mole di lavoro solo per un questione assolutamente insignificante come quella di dare il nome a un pezzettino di strada.
In conclusione, non sono certamente il tipo che per ripicca va a distruggere il lavoro altrui, ma non è accettabile, in assenza di direttive chiare e accettate da tutti, obbligare a mappare seguendo il punto di vista di qualcuno solo perché si è preso la briga di fare una segnalazione; perché ognuno di noi ha le sue idee e in caso di contrasti si può sempre raggiungere un compromesso nel modo più civile possibile.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-19 13:25:48+00:00): The complaint that we (the DWG) have had is along the lines of "we, the local community, have spent a lot of time performing local surveys only to have details removed later".  Looking at the pattern of edits and comments in this area there clearly _is_ a local community.  You may not agree with how they are mapping things, but in this case I'd suggest that most other OSM mappers would agree with them and not you.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-19 13:26:13+00:00): 417/5000
La denuncia che noi (il DWG) abbiamo avuto è sulla falsariga di "noi, la comunità locale, abbiamo passato molto tempo a svolgere indagini locali solo per avere dettagli rimossi successivamente". Osservando lo schema delle modifiche e dei commenti in quest'area, c'è chiaramente una comunità locale. Potresti non essere d'accordo su come stanno mappando le cose, ma in questo caso suggerirei che la maggior parte dei mapper OSM sarebbe d'accordo con loro e non con te.
fayor (2018-08-20 14:29:29+00:00): So di cosa parlo e ti dico per certo che non esiste nulla ti tutto ciò a Comiso o nel ragusano. Sicuramente la segnalazione arriva da uno o due singoli che, per trasparenza, sarebbe opportuno venissero identificati per verificare l'esistenza di questa sedicente "comunità locale". Prendo atto che di tutto quanto ti ho anche detto in precedenza non ne hai tenuto il minimo conto e ti informo che non è necessaria la traduzione Google.
toorboalex (2019-02-07 05:11:12+00:00): Что такое МаРаНо возле д.1/1 по ул.Югорской в г.Сургут в Вашем пакете правок?
zors1843 (2018-07-31 15:35:20+00:00): Gebouw 528097539 heb je verwijderd : bestaat dit gebouw niet meer ?
Mvg,
Georges
R0bst3r (2018-08-16 07:49:13+00:00): Hallo Stefan68,
war hier eine Trinkwasserstelle beabsichtigt?
Ein Brunnen wäre amenity=water_well oder fountain. Die im Kommentar genannte Bank wurde gar nicht erfasst.
ist hier etwas schief gelaufen, oder war das so gewollt?
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61233401
literan (2018-08-01 12:39:51+00:00): будьте аккуратнее, пожалуйста, не надо газон "пристегивать" общей точкой к железной дороге https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61233509/ Не поверю, что между рельсами на магистральной дороге газон растет. Исправлю
Dilon Pait (2018-08-05 05:06:52+00:00): Приветствую. Понятно. 
Как это не растёт газон? Я там загораю через день! Его даже стригут.
Справа от моста такой же газон. Как то я его нанёс, и до  сих пор зеленеет. 
Прислать фото газона?
literan (2018-08-06 10:10:23+00:00): речь не о том, что газона нет ,а о том, что вы, видимо, случайно, одну из его точек пристегнули, прилепили к линии железной дороги. А это неверно, т.к. между двумя рельсами нет газона - там шпалы и щебень.
Dilon Pait (2018-08-11 10:36:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тогда понятно.
GOwin (2018-08-01 00:47:59+00:00): Hi @sniperowl140

Thank you adding details in your favorite neighborhood. 

The school grounds has to be tagged with `amenity=school`, and the individual buildings as `building=school`.
Thunder08 (2018-08-21 19:00:13+00:00): Але у цому місці немає ніякого меморіалу.
tehy (2018-08-21 21:24:14+00:00): є (який вже є). за посиланням на google street view його добре видно: https://goo.gl/maps/QYzoBqwebaJ2
abrensch (2018-09-18 22:53:06+00:00): Hi IceAgeMike,

whats up with this little oneway? Correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607894826

thanx, Arndt
user_5359 (2018-08-02 16:51:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612703214 : I changed the key "ro" to "roof:shape". Please check the correctness.
GOwin (2018-08-03 04:13:26+00:00): Looks good. Just take note that when major highways go through residential areas, they should retain their tags (i.e. `highway=primary`) and not necessarily downgraded (i.e. `highway=residential`). 

Thank you for the variety of edits you've made. Your hometown is starting to shape up. 👌
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61234557
Bexhill-OSM (2018-08-01 00:41:16+00:00): Should this tag have been changed to 'wikimedia_commons'?
mueschel (2018-08-01 10:29:01+00:00): Sure... I corrected so many auto-completion mistakes so I started doing my own. Thanks!
Leo Slager (2018-08-01 17:33:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Владимир К (2018-08-15 09:52:10+00:00): откатываю все правки
joost schouppe (2018-08-03 11:50:42+00:00): That's hilarious. Also, please don't do this. You can get Pokemon to spawn in your neighborhood by adding real data too, and I promise you it will be even more fun than trolling.
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 03:45:16+00:00): Not a track! Please read Map Features.
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 04:46:06+00:00): (Way 606614864 )
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 04:53:37+00:00): Also way 606614862. You have changed many roads here incorrectly. The etiquette at OSM is to make contact before making major changes. Or at least to read the Wiki. You just don't have the experience to make these decisions.
VLD052 (2019-02-25 21:00:39+00:00): Sorry for the misunderstanding, I will be more attentive for instances like these. Thank you for the comments!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-08-02 12:06:05+00:00): Boa tarde João, nesta sua edição, na realidade fez o oposto do que você pretendia. Os eixos de via estavam alinhados e você desalinho-os.

Vou ter de reverter esta sua edição pois é danosa.

Recomendo vivamente que leia estes dois artigos antes da próxima edição que faça:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Uso_de_Imagens#Erros_frequentes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas e 

Qualquer questão entre em contacto, que terei todo o gosto em ajudar.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
Chris Fleming (2018-08-09 21:20:09+00:00): Hi thanks for the edit, it looks great - I see that you requested a review. My only suggestion is to put the restaurant as an addition point inside the hotel outline. This way the building is shown as a hotel and the restuarant as an additional icon.
GöranU (2018-08-13 18:24:54+00:00): Thanks for taking a look.  I was uncertain about how to do when it was both a hotel and a restaurant; that'w why I thought a second look wouldn't hurt.  Now I know what to do next time. :-)

Thanks for improving my edit!
Chris Fleming (2018-08-14 10:16:54+00:00): No problem  - I'm assuming that you've been on holiday to Scotland? Hope you had a good trip and come back again to do some more mapping!
GöranU (2018-08-14 13:16:37+00:00): Yes, we visited Scotland during the first half of July, and had a good time.  We used OpenStreetmap extensively for navigation.  To be a good community member, I try to add details/make corrections for the benefit of those who come after. :-)
Chris Fleming (2018-08-09 21:29:25+00:00): Hi thanks again, I've gone with the same idea here. Separating the hotel and restaurant.
Glassman (2018-08-02 00:20:00+00:00): Tip: To square buildings, select the outline and type an "s" or right click and use the square icon. Also try to match the image when tracing objects. I went ahead and made the corrections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61237412
maraf24 (2018-08-02 13:51:45+00:00): One są płatne? (fee=*)
RitterR (2018-08-06 20:11:25+00:00): Tak. Według informacji na stronie operatora, wymagana jest rejestracja, która wymaga podania rachunku karty kredytowej, z której pobiorą opłatę. Trzeba by dodać info o opłacie dla wszystkich ładowarek tego operatora.
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 03:37:45+00:00): This road is not a track. It does not connect farms to fields, it is 8 meters wide, has traffic, and connects two villages.
robert (2018-08-05 14:53:13+00:00): Did you mean to remove the name "Warwick Drive" in this edit? It has broken a match against the Ordnance Survey Locator database: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=792123
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-31 21:26:18+00:00): #vandalism ? 

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61239199
robert (2018-08-16 18:25:05+00:00): Did you mean to remove the "highway" tag from the way "GREENWOOD COTTAGES" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200236952) in this edit? It broke a match against OS's Locator dataset: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=331912

Without a highway tag, this way is just an abstract line and OSM doesn't know what it's supposed to be.
sheldonelectric (2023-01-10 10:15:57+00:00): STP ne pas ajouter "street" dans int-name! Ne copier que ce que tu vois dans la rue!!
R0bst3r (2018-08-16 07:52:14+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61239601
robbieonsea (2018-08-21 23:26:04+00:00): You may want to consider checking at least for 'source:ref' tags.
At least Brunt Acres Road is signed on the road as C32.
From http://www.flickr.com/photos/pobice/3432837568/ back in 2009 and it's still there as of August 2018 when I went past.
DaveF (2018-08-22 13:35:56+00:00): My things to do list:
Amend 'U' class roads
Check for any 'D/E' class roads
Double check for any missed refs
Check for other refs & discuss on Talk-GB of their validity
Update official_ref wiki & links
Search for 'this road is signed' tags & amalgamate
Search for 'source' tags & amalgamate

If you can think of anything else, please let me know.
Takuto (2018-08-27 14:46:22+00:00): Добрый день. Пожалуйста, сообщите источник вашей адресной информации?
viloan (2018-07-31 20:31:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ent8r (2018-08-01 11:10:01+00:00): Auf der Standardkarte auf openstreetmap.org wird das auch so nicht zu sehen sein...
Man kann ja schließlich nicht die Karte mit allen möglichen Informationen "zumüllen".
Auch der Name dieses Abschnittes sollte nicht "FKK-Bereich" sein, das sollte eher in einen Tag wie description=*. Oder heißt dieser Abschnitt tatsächlich so? Also ist dies "on the ground" nachvollziehbar? Ich denke die Antwort wird wahrscheinlich nein sein...
Vor ein paar Jahren gab es auch schon mal eine kleine Diskussion zu diesem Thema im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12901
Dort ist man aber zu keinem Schluss gekommen.
Ist diese Info so wichtig, dass du sie unbedingt auf der Karte anzeigen lassen willst, oder reicht es nicht auch, dass diese Information vorhanden ist und wenn eine Anwendung diese Daten benötigt, darauf zurückgreifen kann (auf den Wert nudism=yes)?
isteinbach (2018-08-01 15:18:02+00:00): Deinen Kommentar kann ich gut nachvollziehen -- insbesondere den Aspekt "zumüllen" und "lieber description statt name". Ich lerne noch OSM :-)

Die Forum-Diskussion habe ich jetzt auch gelesen. Schade, dass es keinen Konsens gibt. Meine Änderung werde ich also lieber wieder zurückziehen.
ent8r (2018-08-02 11:44:47+00:00): Alles klar! Vielen dank!
Auch durch den tag nudism=yes ist jede App, die diese Info anzeigen will imstande dies zu tun. Für eine ganz simple Abfrage, die solche Plätze anzeigt kannst du dir ja mal das anschauen wenn du willst: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/AJF (zeigt in Jena momentan nur diesen einen Platz hier an...)
ToniE (2018-08-01 07:26:30+00:00): Hallo Acid941,

ich habe, gemäß note:access, noch ein maxweight:conditional=no @ (agricultural) dran gemapped und das traffic_sign= erweitert.

Ich hoffe das passt so.

Viele Grüße
Toni
Acid941 (2018-08-02 12:36:03+00:00): Hallo ToniE, 
ja deine Erweiterung passt so. Immer wieder erstaunlich welche Infos man alles eintragen kann :). 
Beste Grüße 
Acid941
viloan (2018-07-31 21:03:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-08-04 16:55:11+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of tags you put on several buildings?
  propietario = Canepa
  rol = 23-5
  zona PRC = ZCHAL-B
  zona alturas PRC = V2
Please spend some time reading the Wiki or browsing the presets in your editor to learn which tags can be used to describe objects.
kartonage (2018-08-01 05:04:27+00:00): Hallo,

Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass die von dir verlinkte Quelle der Daten einem Urheberrecht untersteht. Hast du die Zustimmung des Urhebers eingeholt diese Daten in OSM übertragen zu dürfen?

Schöne Grüße
Bernard Ladenthin (2018-08-01 05:14:40+00:00): Moin, nein, nichts eingeholt. Die Form von einer Villa habe ich Pi mal Daumen gezeichnet und dann mehrfach so halb an die richtigen Stellen gerückt. Viele Grüße
Bernard Ladenthin (2018-08-01 05:18:13+00:00): Wird übrigens vlt. auch gar nicht so gebaut, siehe http://www.karlshorst-ost.de/planungen-und-vorhaben/karlshorst-ost-projektdaten-und-fakten/ wo die Häuser noch mal anders gezeichnet sind.
kartonage (2018-08-01 16:07:52+00:00): Ich nehme mal an, anhand des Fertigstellungsdatums, dass dort auch noch kein Fundament oder ähnliches vorhanden ist. Das finde ich dann angesichts des Nachzeichnens von unternehmerischen Planzeichnungen, auch wenn es Pi mal Daumen ist, schwierig. Ob das nun in Ordnung geht oder kritisch ist, kann ich nicht genau sagen. Die Klärung von sowas sollte aber nicht die Aufgabe des OSM-Projektes sein, weswegen Graubereiche einfach vermieden werden sollten. Wenn da schon Rohbauten/Fundament stehen würde, könnte man das anders sehen. So habe ich allerdings eher meine Bedenken, nicht bös' gemeint.
Bernard Ladenthin (2018-08-05 14:58:02+00:00): Gar kein Problem, löscht es von mir aus. Ich habs auch gezeichnet um es mir besser vorstellen zu können, was hier demnächst passiert, ich wohne ja hier. Ich trage dann einen Grundriss nach, sobald Fundament gegossen wurde... =)
JJJWegdam (2018-08-01 15:36:52+00:00): Looks good. What source did you use?
mnegrini (2018-08-01 17:53:54+00:00): Mostly an old high res map published by the project that I had lying around. No vector source unfortunately.
Matthew Darwin (2018-08-01 13:45:38+00:00): Hi Danny,
The city says addresses 60 to 139 should be on Renova Private vs you have Pixley Private.
DannyMcD (2018-08-01 14:06:55+00:00): I corrected this, thanks for the pointer.  I think I was tricked by the fact that 58 Pixley is right next to 60 Renova.
Howpper (2018-07-31 21:58:53+00:00): Source: http://www.postfallsidaho.org/city_info/Project%20Updates/CityProjectUpdate.pdf
czubi (2018-08-01 15:42:18+00:00): Hallo, Du hattest um Review deines CS gebeten. Hier einige Anmerkungen.
Im Norden geht die Oberdorfstraße vermutlich nur bis zur "Stadtgrenze" (landuse=residential). Ich vermute mal bis an die Stelle an der sie auf die Dorfstraße trifft. Im Süden ist sie ja auch umbenannt. Da fällt mir auf das noch eine Straße "Unter dem Lohfelde" von der Oberdorfstraße abzweigt. Vermutlich stimmt das nicht mehr, bzw. hat nie gestimmt. Der Rest ist korrekt, einzig die Quelle für die maxspeed könntest du noch eintragen, siehe hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source:maxspeed
bkil (2020-08-06 18:15:19+00:00): Honnan van a házszám? A honlapjuk szerint Maros utca 16 és az alatta található épületen is 16/a szám szerepel az OSM-en. http://www.marossorozo.hu/
Botond Balázs (2020-08-06 20:36:44+00:00): Én ezeket annak idején arrafelé sétálva írtam be, de simán lehet, hogy tévedtem. Rég volt már, nem emlékszem erre a konkrét esetre.
bkil (2020-08-06 20:46:54+00:00): Rendben, köszi az infót. Most beírtam a honlapon lévőt, de majd megnézzük ha egyszer beülünk. Az Avarnál például más van a házon, a rendezési terven, a weblapon és a nyugtán.
William Desportes (2018-08-01 16:02:44+00:00): This was a mistake, ref is for post_box ref:FR:LaPoste for post offices...
Now fixed.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-31 23:43:00+00:00): Não se deve colocar áreas, casas nas vias como você fez. Deve ser traçado em separado.
mueschel (2018-08-04 16:59:48+00:00): Hi,
what does 'strawler' mean? Did you want to write 'stroller'?
robert (2018-09-23 16:58:06+00:00): Did you mean to remove the "highway" tag from "Caerleon Road" in this edit? It broke a match with OS Locator: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=136877
Leo Slager (2018-08-01 17:29:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-07-08 22:44:51+00:00): De oprit is kennelijk opengesteld voor het verkeer.
Zie de opmerking op de kaart.
A67-A67 (2018-11-16 16:01:35+00:00): Are you planning to finish this soon? If not, the old area should be restored. A large part of Zaandam is missing the residential area for 4 months now.
eggie (2018-11-29 10:42:53+00:00): reverted by cangeset #65004530 on request
eggie (2018-11-29 11:04:45+00:00): nehajur PB gestuurd
Amaethon (2018-08-01 15:15:28+00:00): Hey, just curious what your reference for the ATM @ 78 Spring Street, Brantford, Ontario was.
pio2_122 (2018-08-08 16:09:04+00:00): Very careless edit. You've left a lot of highway parts still with aeroway=runway just next to your edited highways. This makes a big mess. Please correct this!
ZeiP (2018-08-08 16:18:56+00:00): Thanks for your polite comments. I'll take a look at them when I have time, feel free to edit the rest yourself too, of course. I do believe that even if there were some ways that weren't edited, it's still a step to the right direction, and shouldn't make a mess.
TohruAzusagawa (2022-06-17 05:34:55+00:00): 请问上述单轨测试线路是否存在？
能否提供相关现场图片？
aharvey (2020-03-29 01:10:50+00:00): I know this is a year old, but per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level the level tag is used to mark levels of a building, not as a generic layer sorting (that's layer=) or to indicate over/under ground (that's location=).

Regardless it looks like in this changeset you've done a select all in JOSM and applied the level=-1 tag. That resulted in every node also getting level=-1 which isn't needed, even if this was indicating layer sorting.

With that in mind I'll revert these changes, but please do post back with what the intention was and if there's still an issue.
aharvey (2020-03-29 01:15:32+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82767731
Baloo Uriza (2018-08-02 03:15:55+00:00): Probably no name on these in reality; it's perfectly acceptable for an unnamed road to have no name tag, but I'd probably change the name tag to description in this case.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61246497
Heavy02 (2018-08-02 15:48:43+00:00): Paul,
Thank you for the suggestion, I appreciate your feedback and have been trying to learn how to better use the capabilities in OSM. I'm now personally visiting any locations prior to updating them to ensure I don't mess up the project, I know that we have neighborhoods in this area that are not listed on OSM but am trying to only put in what I've personally seen. The initial change for this location came from coworkers telling me that they use if for running to stay off the primary streets in the area. We have unfortunately had several fatal accidents  with bikes/joggers in this area and it can be difficult to find safe places to do those activities, it was the main reason I started to update things. Please keep up the feedback as it is making me be more diligent in the inputs I'm listing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61246497