piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rarad74 (2022-06-30 05:02:59+00:00): It is from a mailing list where you must be invited by an administrator . It was years ago. I dint know now if the problems with routing on some navigation app still persist. But it seems logical , that only in cities with more than one main road, trunk road to be declassified one lvl for routing purposes. Other way is too much difference ( from classification point of view) between trunk road which play "traffic collector" role and some secondary roads. In localities where is the only main road, could be as trunk road with no problem.
tom_yorados (2022-06-07 20:32:09+00:00): Review: Ich befürchte das ist ein zu großer Datensatz, als dass ich das durchschauen könnte. Bist du Dir bei was bestimmen unsicher?
natus86 (2022-06-07 21:25:18+00:00): Also speziell die Verknüpfung der Buslinien, da sehe ich auch gerade, dass Linie 114 ein Stück der Strecke verloren gegangen ist.
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-07 19:51:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 121955675, 122060965, 122061164, 122061353, 122061599, 122064495, 122064670, 122064759, 122064775, 122065134, 122065609, 122065653, 122065720, 122066266, 122066362, 122066804.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-21 16:14:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3233697 - zerkniesz? Jest potwierdzenie że bubel poszedł do kosza?
Dawid2849 (2022-06-21 16:21:14+00:00): Być może się jeszcze zmieni, nie wiemy, ale niewydolnej trąbki na pewno nie wybudują i moim zdaniem nie powinno jej być w OSM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 20:57:22+00:00): "ale niewydolnej trąbki na pewno nie wybudują" skąd ta pewność?

Może za bardzo pesymistyczny jestem
Dawid2849 (2022-06-22 21:03:13+00:00): https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-krakow/beda-zmiany-na-wezle-mistrzejowice-w-ciagu-s7

"Analiza ruchu wykonana przez Politechnikę Krakowską wskazuje na *konieczność* przeprojektowania dwóch łącznic węzła Mistrzejowice"
Allison P (2022-06-07 19:51:11+00:00): Didn't mean to ask for review, but heck. Let's see if the world has any thoughts on this sort of edit of mine.
Leo Slager (2022-06-07 20:21:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
hauke-stieler (2022-06-07 20:04:41+00:00): Hab zu schnell Enter gedrückt: "survey" kann von den Quellen ignoriert werden, hab das nur anhand der Luftbilder eingetragen.
iGELei (2022-06-07 20:13:33+00:00): Das war ein Fehler, es ist kein Duplikat. This was a mistake, it's not a duplicat.
Polarbear (2022-06-07 20:11:10+00:00): CS comment was: fixed forward/backward roles
Glassman (2022-06-08 21:07:33+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - otherwise your edit is good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122088499
Glassman (2022-06-08 21:11:11+00:00): The house should be the same as the building outline. I updated the outline. Also we don't add personal information to OSM. I removed Linnea's Empire.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122088805
Mashin (2022-06-08 09:22:50+00:00): Looks all good to me. Thanks!
jpennycook (2022-06-07 20:41:42+00:00): correction - surveys 19/03/2022 and 15/05/2022
pitfire (2022-06-08 03:59:32+00:00): Hallo Morgan81,

Betr. 1037122628, v2

als Linie ohne Verbindung zur Trasse hat die Schranke keinerlei Auswirkung. Die einfache und übliche Methode ist die Verwendung auf einem Punkt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=gate?uselang=de
Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, ist das eine Schranke: 
swing_gate:type single
felipeeugenio (2022-06-08 13:32:58+00:00): Hola

supongo que quizo decir 20 metros (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height)

saludos
Leo Slager (2022-06-08 15:10:01+00:00): review:
barrier=gate wordt niet als lijn-element op de kaart gezet.
Ik pas het even aan.
user4816003805 (2022-06-18 03:47:13+00:00): It seems like SFMOMA Artists Gallery (https://osm.org/node/4010401867) should be tagged as "tourism=gallery", but https://www.sfmoma.org/artists-gallery/ also suggests that it's closed.
Dodko (2022-06-08 09:05:02+00:00): Pre správne fungovanie je potrebné pridať značky
shop=massage
massage=thai

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=massage
MarcoR (2022-06-10 14:52:33+00:00): Ciao Frasty!

Scusa l'intrusione ma credo che landuse=allotments abbia un significato molto particolare e che in Italia sia corretto usarlo solo per quei piccoli lotti di terra, in genere di forma uguale e vicini tra loro, in cui l'utente che li gestisce non ne sia anche il proprietario.

È vero che leisure=garden su OSM indica soprattutto i giardini botanici, ma con "access", "garden:type" e "garden:style" è possibile a mio avviso arrivare a mappare anche, ad esempio, i "giardini" privati che vengono utilizzati dai rispettivi proprietari per piccoli orti, luoghi di svago, bbq, etc.

Non posso mettere le mani sul fuoco, dato che non abito in quella zona, ma le aree che hai modificato tu dovrebbero essere proprio questo: terreni agricoli o semplici giardini privati, di proprietà di persone fisiche, chiusi da cancelli e in cui sono presenti edifici (talvolta abitazioni, talvolta baracche).

Buon mapping,
Marco.
frasty (2022-06-11 11:36:16+00:00): Ciao MarcoR,
grazie per l'intervento..
In effetti landuse=allotments è un tag che in Italia probabilmente risulta un po' ambiguo, un po' come living_street. Forse perché creato per essere utilizzato principalmente nel mondo anglosassone.
Ho notato che solo alcuni leisure=garden avevano le chiavi aggiuntive, la maggior parte ne era sprovvista e senza limitazioni di accesso, che potrebbero indurre a pensare a chi non conosce la zona che si tratta di giardini pubblici, cosa che purtroppo viene favorita da openstreetmap-carto visto che non fa distizioni per le aree. Appena ho un po' di tempo ci rimetto mano, e magari do un occhio con overpass per vedere come sono state mappate zone simili in altre parti. Ciao!
MarcoR (2022-06-13 14:26:49+00:00): Grazie per la risposta. Sì, erano quasi tutti mappati come "giardini pubblici" e hai fatto bene a modificarli; sul fatto che le etichette siano pensate per la realtà inglese-tedesca la penso come te: spesso costringono noi mappatori italiani a cercare quella "meno peggio" e non sempre si riesce o si è tutti d'accordo; bisognerebbe proporre delle etichette specifiche per la realtà italiana ma non so quanto il gioco  valga la candela (immagino anche la difficoltà da parte degli utilizzatori dei dati nel dover conoscere le migliaia di piccole sfaccettature tra oggetti simili in paesi diversi).

Alla prossima,
Marco.
jeslop (2022-06-08 07:51:52+00:00): Hola pert1234 y bienvenido a OSM.

Para empezar a cartografiar te recomiendo que leas la guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Un sitio de recetas no tiene lugar en OSM. Te revierto el cambio.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Gior7 (2022-06-21 11:06:14+00:00): Scusami ma questa modifica non ha alcun senso, le rotaie ci sono quindi hai sbagliato ad eliminare i percorsi, al massimo se non eri d'accordo con i tag potevi modificarli
WikiLuke (2022-06-21 11:50:29+00:00): Hai ragione, ero convinto che andassero eliminati in quanto con railway=disused sulla wiki si faceva riferimento a tratti ferroviari dismessi (c'è una foto di una ferrovia nei boschi). 
Attualmente non penso che si utilizzeranno le rotaie quindi per fortuna non dovrei aver fatto un gran danno.
Se sai come annullare le modifiche sei libero di farlo (oppure se vuoi puoi spiegarmelo).
Gior7 (2022-06-21 13:18:16+00:00): Va bene, non ti preoccupare, fortunatamente erano solo due percorsi.
Comunque non so come annullare automaticamente le modifiche.
ivanbranco (2022-06-21 15:28:10+00:00): Puoi usare http://revert.osmz.ru/ per revertare l'intero changeset.
Gior7 (2022-06-21 15:31:50+00:00): Allora procedo, grazie
WikiLuke (2022-06-21 18:54:23+00:00): Grazie
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-23 11:14:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457940735/history - have you intended surface=concrete here?
nevw (2022-06-08 05:39:33+00:00): This appears incorrectly mapped and bears no relationship to bounds of natural areas viewed on satellite imagery.
bora can (2022-06-07 22:49:20+00:00): Sınır ve POI dışında ilk kez haritalamayı deneyimlemeye çalışıyorum; ancak doğru işaretlemiş miyim alanları, bilmiyorum.
Leo Slager (2022-06-08 15:19:00+00:00): Als dat zo is, dan zou je een terugmelding kunnen doen in de BAG van het Kadaster:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=195031.14904949&geometry.y=589668.07104172&zoomlevel=7&objectId=1891100001635320&detailsObjectId=1891010001648482.
Terugmelding maken met het blauwe potloodje aan de linkerzijde.
Dan kan de gemeente dat wijzigen.
Anders komt bij de eerstvolgende import van gebouwen en adressen de oude situatie weer op de kaart te staan.
earlyistimeless (2022-06-08 19:39:24+00:00): Gedaan, bedankt!
abakus_uploader (2022-06-08 22:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Josef73 (2022-10-26 20:10:46+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours.
JessAk71 (2022-06-07 23:54:29+00:00): Hi thirashima, thanks for updating closed pois. For pois that are now empty, you can mark the amenity as disused using this: disused:amenity=restaurant which follows the schema here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: instead of changing the name tag to 'closed'. Otherwise your change is saying this restaurant is still open and its name is now called "closed" which I dont think is what you meant to do.
user_5359 (2022-06-09 06:44:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9802770531 (one of thirteen nodes). Why did you use the tag source:survey:2022-06-07 = yes instead of source = survey 2022-06-07 ?

Bonjour ! Jetez un coup d'oeil sur http://www.osm.org/node/9802770531 (un des treize noeuds). Pourquoi avez-vous utilisé le tag source:survey:2022-06-07 = yes au lieu de source = survey 2022-06-07 ?
nilodo (2023-01-25 21:43:30+00:00): Hoi,

Wil je hier even naar kijken:
https://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=90&error=135847505

Groet, F.
Karthoo (2022-06-09 08:33:10+00:00): Hallo, danke fürs Ergänzen der Touren!
Könntest du bei der Route 2 das osmc:symbol nochmal korrigieren? Da hast du wohl aus versehen das von Route 1 verwendet.
Gruß, Karthoo/Leon
Karthoo (2022-06-09 08:55:02+00:00): Route 4 übrigens auch, hab ich grade noch gesehen
seichter (2022-06-09 11:50:32+00:00): Erledigt, waren ja nur zwei Ziffern.

Bei den Wegweisern habe ich bisher die ref nur an den Aufklebern der Bergwacht gesehen. Ich habe sie also den emergency_acess_point zugeordnet. 
Ob man die zu den guidepost mit dazu packt, gibt es unterschiedliche Ansichten, stellenweise werden sie künstlich als extra node ein paar Zentimeter daneben gemappt, aber man sollte sie mMn nicht ersatzlos vom guidepost löschen.
Karthoo (2022-06-09 18:07:14+00:00): Hab ich was an einem Wegweiser gelöscht? Wenn ja, war es höchstens aus versehen...
Refs stehen an den SWV-Wegweisern entweder auf der Rückseite der Wegweiserschilder oder vertikal auf der Vorderseite entlang der schwarzen Balken.
seichter (2022-06-09 18:45:46+00:00): emergency-tags: Ok, ich wollte nur wissen, ob das Absicht war.
ref: Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe das jetzt auch auf ein paar von meinen Wegweiser-Bildern gefunden und werde das in Zukunft auch noch mit aufnehmen.
impiaaa (2022-06-09 16:16:38+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Allison P (2022-06-08 00:58:18+00:00): Roads should not be separated unless there is a physical barrier (i.e., not just paint). This makes for a complicated fix. Consider reverting this changeset and reimplementing the other changes.
regen751 (2022-06-08 01:02:25+00:00): There is a physical Concrete barrier on Linder Road at the intersection to prevent turning. (Old Valley is an example)
Herrieman (2022-06-09 19:33:30+00:00): Hoi, uit interesse: waarom heb je de reeds bestaande relatie verwijderd en een nieuwe gemaakt? Was er iets niet goed met de oude? (Zo ja, hoor ik graag wat, leer ik ook weer van).
A67-A67 (2022-06-11 12:10:35+00:00): Hoi,
Het was niet mijn bedoeling om de oude relatie te verwijderen, maar er zaten wel wat fouten in. Ik was begonnen op een plek waar ik de oude relatie niet in de lijst zag, dus toen had ik een nieuwe aangemaakt. Toen ik doorhad dat er wel al een was, heb ik ze samengevoegd, maar daarbij heb ik de verkeerde verwijderd.

Ik heb de oude relatie hersteld en de nieuwe ermee samengevoegd, nu met de id van de oude. 

De oude relatie liep maar in één richting, terwijl de ringweg in beide richtingen loopt. Dit kan met forward- en backward-rollen.
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-08 06:05:58+00:00): What's with all these businesses?!?!
GerdP (2022-07-17 06:20:09+00:00): Hi!
Why don't you also set foot=use_sidepath here? Pedestrians also should use the sidepath.
Leo Slager (2022-06-08 15:24:52+00:00): barrier=gate gewijzigd naar een node.
MxxCon (2022-06-08 15:36:05+00:00): Hello.
When mapping square or rectangular features, you can right click on them and select "Make Square". That will make that feature have right angles, making your mapping more accurate and look neater. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122093935
Yorvik Prestigitator (2022-06-09 00:58:31+00:00): Hi, are the phone boxes back? I thought they had been removed a few years ago
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-08 06:08:43+00:00): Is there a reason you just spammed businesses here?  Clearly there aren't this many in actuality.

Additionally, what do you mean "Add business according to local social distancing protocol"?
impiaaa (2022-06-08 06:45:35+00:00): This is a part of the Santa Clara County Social Distancing Protocol Import: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County,_California/Social_distancing_protocol_import Each of these points might not be a full store front, but they do exist as registered businesses.
jimfenton (2022-06-08 16:03:58+00:00): It's quite common for hairdressers and similar personal care providers that operate as independent businesses to share a common salon or studio in very close proximity to each other.
ykim3848 (2022-06-08 20:13:58+00:00): These are salons (hair, nail, skincare etc.) in a 'beauty franchise' building (Sola Salon Studios or Sola Salons).  Each business rents a studio (small space) which is sometimes shared by multiple part time operators.  I add a note to the ones I map with 'In Sola Salons' to indicate that.
the-wouter (2022-06-08 13:26:30+00:00): Hey, I see you are adding an abandoned railroad. I don't think this is mapped correctly. The wiki mentions that the railway=abandoned tag is "A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure. " Most of the route you have mapped here does not appear to be still visible today. Please see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=abandoned.
geogidon (2022-06-08 14:37:45+00:00): Hi Wouter, thanks for your note! Most of the route is visible in the landscape. I have mapped it only in sections where it was not replaced by a path, road, etc. The box on the right shows the range of the edits but can be misleading regarding the amount of track actually mapped.
user_12531033 (2022-06-08 11:23:46+00:00): 您好，请把车站内股道名称填写在railway:track_ref标签下，不要放到name里面。
archpdx (2022-06-08 15:59:22+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for all of your recent contributions. Please note in the future that we don't use the name tag to describe features, see https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I've moved the name for the Stormwater containment pond to the description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122094732
MelancholicSlav (2022-06-09 04:47:22+00:00): Hi there, I appreciate your addition of junction=circular both here and at the Newton Corner junction, but what is your reason for removing oneway=yes tags when they are perfectly valid?
MelancholicSlav (2022-06-09 04:49:07+00:00): I have driven through this intersection many times and the circular part is indisputably a oneway
Falsernet (2022-06-09 23:21:45+00:00): Because oneway=yes is implied by junction=circular. You won't see a change in rendering, or any routing application that correctly interprets the junction=circular tag.
MelancholicSlav (2022-06-10 01:01:54+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. The Tag:junction=circular Wiki page does request the use of oneway=* so I've readded those.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-09 10:46:54+00:00): What source are you using for these?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122095038
MapGrid (2022-06-08 03:01:01+00:00): The boundary of Carcross I.R. No. 4 was first surveyed and demarcated in 1959. Survey record is "CLSR 50051 YT".
Carcross I.R. No. 4 still exists today (less the portion carved out by the highway), but it is now a "retained reserve" that is part of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation (CTFN) settlement lands.
The boundary shown by OSM was wrong; it had been copied from Statistics Canada's census subdivision "Carcross 4" which is a crude approximation of the original I.R. boundary. The result of all this is that the map was showing the Carcross I.R. No. 4 aboriginal_lands boundary crossing the CTFN aborignal_lands boundary. It looked like somebody had scribbled all over the map. Even if it had been mapped properly, we would still have had aborignal_lands boundaries nested inside other aborignal_lands boundaries with some overlapping edges.
In order to make the map readable, I have taken the bold step of deleting Carcross I.R. No. 4.
The census subdivision boundary (Carcross 4) will remain in OSM, but it is not normally rendered.
Also note there was a change to Carcross 4 in Statistics Canada's 2021 boundary maps; the boundary now stops at the shoreline of Nares Lake. I have updated the Carcross 4 boundary in OSM accordingly.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-09 10:51:39+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122095119
marczoutendijk (2022-06-11 19:41:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6064
Herman Lee (2022-06-08 03:35:47+00:00): #Bus_route 公交线路 上海部分 Shanghai 上海公交 60
MxxCon (2022-06-08 16:08:28+00:00): "handball" and "american_handball" are different sports 😉 I'll fix it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122095846
laurent-38 (2022-06-08 07:30:29+00:00): Hi Lthor96,

Please don't do such large changeset, from Ireland to Australia. Making 2 small changeset would have been more relevant, easier to revise and less noisy for other contributors.

Cheers
~~
laurent
marvinjohnz (2022-06-08 11:59:12+00:00): this was not necessary
Laveure (2022-06-09 04:45:28+00:00): were you dropped as a child?
silversurfer83 (2022-06-10 20:01:51+00:00): that's not very nice of you to say, Laveure. I'd ask you to be more kind.

As for the CS of LThor96: It's hard to give feedback, when it's all over the place, so PLEASE stay within a reasonably small area, when mapping. If unsure, check the wiki or one of the many chatgroups. There's always help around the next corner.
Lancelotance (2022-06-11 11:52:53+00:00): Are your grandparents astronaut?
Phohernes12 (2022-06-26 07:08:45+00:00): Were your grandparents everywhere? That's Kinda big
aixbrick (2022-06-08 13:56:49+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
bezüglich des Radwegs an der Ludwigsallee und des Stücks Bürgersteig an der Krefelder Straße: Solange Radwege/Bürgersteige nicht baulich getrennt angelegt sind (d.h. es befindet sich zwischen Straße und Radweg/Bürgersteig ein Grünstreifen oder ein Hindernis), sollten diese nicht als eigene Wege gemappt werden. Der neue Radweg und auch der Bürgersteig sind nicht baulich getrennt angelegt und sollten daher als cycleway:right=track bzw. sidewalk=right an der Straße erfasst sein/bleiben.
Gruß
FahrradstadtAachen (2022-06-09 22:54:50+00:00): Hallo aixbrick, danke für den Hinweis. Ich war mir auch unsicher, ob es eine gute Idee ist. Ich habe mich dann doch dazu entschieden, weil an der Bastei der Gehweg getrennt ist und es eine zweite Ebene gibt. Auch an der Einmündung Kupferstraße ist die Situation komplexer und es waren bereits separate Gehwege gemappt. Die Radwege sind ja schon beulich angelegt durch einen Hochbordstein. An der Halifaxstr. sind sie sehr ähnich und auch separat gemappt. Wenn es nicht passt, können wir es aber auch gerne zurücksetzten, wobei ich nicht weiß, wie man dann die zweiete Gehweg-Ebene an der Bastei und die Fußwege an der Kupferstraße sinnvoll mappt. Grüße
aixbrick (2022-06-10 07:05:19+00:00): Den abgetrennten Gehweg (also nur die 2. Ebene) an der Bastei kann man auch als eigenen Weg mappen, der dann am Beginn und Ende mit der jew. Straße verbunden wird (gilt auch für die Treppe).
Der Weg an der Kupferstraße ist schon älter. Wahrscheinlich wurde das aufgrund der Parkplätze gemacht.
Die Wege auf der "Insel" bilden die tatsächlichen Wege ab.
Ein Hochbordstein ist keine bauliche Trennung. Hierfür ist cycleway=track gedacht.
Es gibt immer Bereiche, in denen die Wege (noch) separat gemappt sind. Entweder geschah das zu Zeiten, als es nicht anders ging (z.B. mangels Tags) oder in Unkenntnis, wodurch es zu Doppelerfassungen kommen kann (eigener Weg *und* Tags an der Straße).
wireguy (2022-06-08 12:36:45+00:00): this change broke Penn-Fallsway relation.  fixed.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-08 14:54:06+00:00): Sorry about that, I didn't even think that's where the boundary for that neighborhood was. I'll make sure to be more diligent about checking going forward, this is what happens when you have 200+ neighborhoods in a small city
alyaa_hossam (2022-06-12 11:20:16+00:00): Hello theoarslan;
I noticed you added "motorway_juction" in the wrong location, and it should be added in the legal exit.
link for the node you added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6759691446
link for the node should be added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1830062136
There is a link for "Mapillary image" showing the right position for adding "motorway_junction":
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=34.25056620758356&lng=35.66670149389961&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=497070301338383&x=0.5592697013788647&y=0.6193583629194064&zoom=0.43683118540614707
link for OpentstreetMap wiki to a description of how to use "motorway_junction"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction
Could you fix this issue?  if you need any help please let me know.
Regards
alyaa_hossam
Zol87 (2022-06-08 04:21:42+00:00): 722 Bus now operates on posted stops only
https://www.pacebus.com/notice/route-722-new-policy-posted-stops-only
rayth (2023-11-08 11:16:19+00:00): Hi. Can I know why do you include a part of UM into Seksyen 16 and exclude KK13 UM (formerly UIA PJ) from Seksyen 16?

http://pjcityplan.mbpj.gov.my:81/mapguide/mbpjfusion/main.php

The official border are a lot more straightforward. Seksyen 16 is roughly bounded by:
- Jalan Dato Abu Bakar 16/1
- Jalan Prof Diraja Ungku Aziz
- Jalan 17/1
- Jalan Damansara
AkuAnakTimur (2023-11-11 09:39:43+00:00): Sorry to interrupt. Do we have permission to use said data as you mentioned (per https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright#trademarks)?