piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2021-08-02 07:45:18+00:00): What is the point of these changes regarding the ferry-lines? You choose not to comment this cs.
archie (2021-08-02 07:35:01+00:00): What was the point of this changeset?
BodhidharmaI (2021-08-02 10:07:49+00:00): Typographic changes: hyphens replaced with dashes
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2021-08-05 15:04:15+00:00): Please write changeset descriptions from the beginning
StephaneP (2021-08-04 13:43:24+00:00): Hi!
Why did you remove these polygons ? Do you think aerial imagery taken during spring is the good answer to draw or remove stream aeras ?

Stéphane
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-04 13:57:19+00:00): Hi,

It seemed like this tiny stream was better represented by a waterway=stream.  The areas looked like they were bad import data.  Is there a better imagery source I should be using?  I was using "Ortho HR" which indicated it was less than a year old?  Is there a different source that is better for mapping water features?
StephaneP (2021-08-04 19:14:15+00:00): I don't know if deleting these polygons was a good idea or not. The best answer would be a real survey during winter, when there is much more water.
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-04 19:46:37+00:00): Yeah, I'm not sure either, except that I'm confident this funny looking polygon is not actually what's real on the ground.  But in any case, I just resurrected, merged, and simplified the original stream geometry here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76748067

I guess it's a local problem now :)
DressyPear4 (2021-08-02 15:33:36+00:00): Olá, melhore a descrição de suas modificações.
Veja mais em
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108993770
user_5359 (2022-01-17 07:35:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). 

If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. 

For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
neuhausr (2021-08-02 15:59:37+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you're trying to add a place to the map, create a node or way for the location instead of picking a nearby intersection. Check out the editor walkthrough if it's not clear. Happy mapping!
eggie (2021-08-02 05:21:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Kleine aanpassing verricht. Alle info verplaatst naar adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-02 05:25:26+00:00): De Lidl was hier al toegevoegd op de kaart. Svp niet dubbel taggen. We gebruiken de adresnode in zulke gevallen. adressen hebben een afgesproken format anders werkt het niet.
Ik zal je vermelding verwijderen.
MVG
eggue
tekim (2021-08-02 14:53:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits, I think you are working from outdated imagery. This is now a pedestrian plaza (as is currently displayed in OSM). The Maxar Premium Imagery shows the plaza.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108999982
mshahaba (2021-08-03 08:47:03+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of roads, I've missed to check the latest aerial imagery. I'll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mshahaba
andershl (2021-08-02 08:37:38+00:00): OK, tak, du har rettet til name:da, men osse noget andet, som jeg ikke lige kan se, hvad er, og derfor risikerer at gentage :-)
andershl (2021-08-02 08:40:57+00:00): Åh, regnearket havde smækket stort begyndelsesbogstav på source...
limmmoh (2021-08-02 06:05:37+00:00): Driver Feedback
Enock4seth (2021-08-02 18:05:30+00:00): OSMAnd provides "Quick Actions" - https://osmand.net/features/quick-action which is useful for defining regular functions and custom tags such as "religion=christian", and others. I hope  this helps.

Also, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_Practice
Glassman (2021-08-02 19:57:41+00:00): #TIP: if it's just a basketball court, I'd tag it as leisure=pitch + sport=basketball instead of as a park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109007701
eggie (2021-08-02 09:02:53+00:00): Tip.. Wanneer je de weg openstelt dan svp de regel construction=residential weghalen.
Dat is de specificatie van de highwa-construction.
Doe je het zelf?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-02 09:05:57+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109009169
alessandrocarmeli (2021-08-16 21:33:44+00:00): what do you explain with led lit tags?
eggie (2021-08-03 08:20:28+00:00): Feedback

Gebruikelijker is om amenity=fastfood te taggen
Dat geeft ook een ander symbool.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
---------------------------
    cuisine=fast_food

If you know places with this tag, verify if it could be tagged with another tag.

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-03 08:24:47+00:00): Tagging aangepast.. 
amenity=fast_food
fast_food=cafetaria

Laat maar weten of het klopt.
MVG
eggie
Whimsical (2021-08-03 08:37:45+00:00): Klopt! Leerzaam.
SGorskiy (2021-08-02 11:23:22+00:00): 123?
iWowik (2021-08-03 06:02:00+00:00): 1-2-3! 
Ёлочка, гори!
SGorskiy (2021-08-03 06:15:11+00:00): 😂
rain_99 (2021-08-03 06:29:54+00:00): Пора что-то менять.
Хорошо, буду писать 321
SGorskiy (2021-08-03 06:31:38+00:00): Ура! Есть прогресс.
user_10241830 (2021-08-02 09:18:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich werde die unfragten Massenumbenennungen von Bushaltestellen hier (und anderswo) selbstverständlich wieder rückgängig machen. Das ist übrigens nicht das erste Mal, dass du mit solchen umgefragten (und unerwünschten) Massenumbenennungen auffällst.
wies1 (2021-08-02 14:05:18+00:00): Hallo,
was ist hierab falsch? Der Name ist doch richtig. Oder etwa nicht?
Gruß
wies1
wies1 (2021-08-02 14:22:41+00:00): Hallo, hier ging es um die VRN Linie 902. Ich habe hier gerade noch einmal zur Vergewisserung in den Linienfahrplan geschaut. Die Haltestellen sind so bezeichnet, wie Sie im Linienfahrplan genannt worden sind.
user_10241830 (2021-08-02 14:34:02+00:00): Hallo,

die Namen der Bushaltestellen sollten nicht den Namen des Ortes beinhalten. Der Grund hierfür ist ganz einfach: in den gedruckten ÖPNV-Karten (die es auch vom VRN gibt) sind die Bushaltestellen ebenfalls ohne den Namen des Ortes verzeichnet. Aus diesem Grund sollten wir dem großen Vorbild folgen und auch die Bushaltestellen ohne den Namen des Ortes aufführen. Haltestellennamen mit Namen des Ortes wirken wegen ihrer Länge auch auf der Karte ziemlich störend.
Zhytomyr (2021-12-21 00:14:42+00:00): Hi hanlar,

you've pointed the Wikidata tag pointed to the person, which needs to be corrected.

Kind regards
Eifelkobold! (2021-08-11 21:19:29+00:00): Guten Abend,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass in diesem Änderungssatz die Wege am Falkenhorst und Kindergarten in Kommern-Süd bearbeitet hast. Dabei hast du unter anderem eine neue, sehr restriktive Zugangsbeschränkung eingetragen und die Einbahnstraßenregelung vor dem Kindergarten entfernt. Damit wäre der Fußweg zum Akazienweg nicht mehr nutzbar und Straße vor dem Kindergarten eine Sackgasse. Was ist der Grund für diese Änderungen?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Raymond (2021-08-12 06:24:47+00:00): Guten Morgen Eifelkobold, vielen Dank für die Überprüfung meiner Tätigkeitkeit in diesem Gebiet. 
Die Einbahnstraßenregelung vor dem Kindergarten habe ich wieder eingefügt auf Grund meiner Mapillary-Fotos von letzter Woche https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=811672706172887

Den access=private habe ich erstmal wieder entfernt, da nicht explizit ausgewiesen. Andererseits ist dieser Zufahrtsweg zum Pflegeheim eigentlich auch nur für Mitarbeitende/Besucher gedacht. Vielleicht bietet es sich an, den Fußweg stattdessen an den Halbkreis vor dem Kindergarten anzuschließen? Was meinst du?

Ich bin kommendes Wochende nochmal in dem Bereich. Falls ich noch Mapillary-Fotos aus anderen Perspektiven machen soll, lass es mich bitte wissen. Viele Grüße.
Raimond
Eifelkobold! (2021-08-12 20:02:07+00:00): Hi Raymond,

super, vielen Dank für die Änderungen und deine Mapillary-Bilder (die haben mir an anderen Stellen auch schon ein paar mal geholfen). Ich habe mir das heute vor Ort mal genauer angeschaut und noch ein paar eigene Fotos gemacht. Für mich sieht es nach drei eigenständigen Wegen ohne bauliche Trennung aus. Links die hell gepflasterte Zufahrt zum Falkenhorst, in der Mitte der dunkel gepflasterte Fußweg (wobei der auch Parkstreifen sein könnte, hier muss man evtl. noch die Beschilderung abwarten) und rechts die aspahltierte Zufahrt zum Kindergarten. Die beiden Zufahrten haben auch jeweils ein eigenes Einbahnstraßenschild. Ich würde daher in Openstreetmap ebenfalls drei Wege eintragen. Beim access-Wert für die Auffahrt bin ich mir unsicher, was dort die beste Lösung ist. Im Grunde verbietet nichts die Benutzung, vom Fußgänger gibt es aus Richtung Akazienweg sogar einen Abzweig Richtung Falkenhorst. Nichts würde aus der Richtung erkennen lassen, dass es hier auf Privatgelände geht. Die Fußwege neben der Zufahrt trage ich dann wahrscheinlich direkt mit ein.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
ftcat (2021-08-03 08:36:50+00:00): Be careful you don't break relations with your edits. The Kasanka National Park boundary relation was broken here with your recent edits. Would be a good idea you don't edit existing major features such as relations and park boundaries
BAK365 (2021-08-02 17:45:56+00:00): Hallo,
schau doch bitte mal bei diesen Wiki-Seiten vorbei:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

"Hinni" bei den Hydranten kannst du z.Bsp. als manufacturer=* erfassen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:manufacturer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal

Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du die gerne hier stellen.

BAK365
iWowik (2021-08-03 07:04:30+00:00): День добрый!

1) Следуйте, пожалуйста, принятому порядку написания наименований улиц
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Правильно писать "2-я Садовая улица"

2) Названия "улица 17-я линия" и тем более "улица 3-й проезд" вызывают большое сомнение в правильности. Тут слова улица откуда взялось? Откуда вы берете названия элементов улично-дорожной сети?
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-08-05 10:12:30+00:00): >>> Откуда вы берете названия элементов улично-дорожной сети?
Описание пакета как бы намекает...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109012826
iWowik (2021-08-05 10:54:16+00:00): А имя маппера как бы намекает на работу на экстренные службы.

112orenburg1! Копировать данные без разрешения правообладателя запрещено в OSM.
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-08-05 10:58:01+00:00): Их четверо в банде. И на замечания они не реагируют.
iWowik (2021-08-07 07:17:29+00:00): На второго наткнулся
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109237621

Это уже тянет на не выполнение рекомендаций по организованному редактированию в части необходимости отвечать на попытки связаться
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
iWowik (2021-08-07 07:37:56+00:00): Интересно, этот тоже из них?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108852581
mavl (2021-08-08 11:02:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, 112orenburg1.  
Нужно явное разрешение на использование данных Яндекс Карт в качестве источника данных для OpenStreetMap. Такое разрешение имеется?
mavl (2021-08-14 12:55:55+00:00): Данные, добавленные на карту этим пакетом правок, удалены.
Mex (2021-08-03 16:29:51+00:00): Did you validate this on the ground, there (at least used to) exist a set of stairs to a pavement on the side you have deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109013136
Ropino (2021-08-04 06:58:49+00:00): It looked like a bug, when a footway ends in 'nothing' and is not connected to other ways.
I have restored this footway.
Sriosm (2021-08-02 10:42:29+00:00): Have split the way at flairs, corrected the geometry and added surface tag, bridge tag, layer tag #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109013398
20180911 (2021-08-04 19:30:57+00:00): You requested a review and it looks good. The cycleway in the south does not need a foot=yes tag, as in the UK this is the default. All OK.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109013597
fghj753 (2021-08-03 09:56:57+00:00): Hello,
I noticed you are using custom script to upload bus stops to OSM. Due to slightly diagonal shape Norway, changesets covering entire Norway like this one will also cover most populous parts of neighbouring countries, which may upset some people. Is it possible to split your changesets somewhere between latitude 64..66N?
I took a look at your upload script and it's processing based on counties. Seems like easiest solution to implement would be running two copies of script: one which excludes counties ["18", "54"]; other version excludes others ["03", "11", "15", "30", "34", "38", "42", "46", "50"]. Downside of this approach means having to input your password twice. Alternative is perhaps segregating lines 974-994 to separate function, passing excluded counties to function via arguments and calling it twice.
Do you mind looking into splitting changesets?
nsr2osm (2021-08-03 10:24:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment.

Unfortunately, matching of new and old stops needs all counties to be processed in the same run, because the two could be located in different counties, just across the border.

The changesets are labeled "Norway" to avoid any confusion.

There are several other regular updates/changesets which spans entire Norway with a large bbox, but it seems to be ok for other users as long as the changeset comment is clear.
fghj753 (2021-08-03 10:28:47+00:00): Ok then. Thanks for replying.
user_10714872 (2021-08-02 09:47:51+00:00): 大佬辛苦了
Z-26 (2021-08-02 09:56:27+00:00): 啊啊谢谢
GinaroZ (2021-08-02 11:09:35+00:00): What issues did you fix?
Anarkick (2021-08-02 11:21:47+00:00): A previous commenter pointed out that I was adding a lot of errors with my additions so I was attempting to go through my previous edits and clean up any issues that persist
Lee Carré (2021-08-02 22:51:43+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂. Especially for changesets covering large areas (though, smaller areas and several changesets would be much preferable).
LucGommans (2021-08-02 09:01:27+00:00): Reykjanesbær is a municipality consisting of Keflavík, Njarðovík and Hafnir; it's not a city. The region is already defined by boundary=administrative (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8467955). Not sure we need the extra node at all, but it seems to be actively maintained so I figured maybe update it rather than removing. Feel free to comment if you don't think this is correct, it's the first time I edit a place=* :)
flother (2021-08-03 09:55:03+00:00): Hi,

Unfortunately it's not quite as simple as that ;)

While Reykjanesbær is a municipality, it's also the name commonly used for the now-contiguous towns of Keflavík, Njarðvík, and Ásbrú.

I think we're probably in a transition period where the three places will eventually considered suburbs of a larger town (Iceland's national statistics agency no longer published separate population stats for Keflavík and Njarðvík, for example). But at the moment it's a bit ambiguous as to how they should all be tagged.

I moved the node back to the centre point of the three and re-tagged it as a town in changeset 109082601.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109082601

Happy mapping!
LucGommans (2021-08-03 10:17:37+00:00): Oh, that's quite confusing but okay, thanks for catching this flother! It might also be good to change it on Wikipedia, since that's still saying it's a municipality and that's where I got confused. Do you have a link to something like a news article or this combined population stat, something that could be used as a source on Wikipedia?
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-16 08:58:14+00:00): Why have you also deleted some admin boundaries like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7266744/history ?
Lepuse (2021-08-16 11:07:50+00:00): The subareas of the administrative  boundary relation should not be composed of nodes, and the administrative boundary relation with only one node is meaningless.
SekeRob (2021-08-02 12:37:21+00:00): hi,

please review the changes I made to your edits in the hospital area

1) when highway=construction is put on a way, you also need to tag what is being constructed... construction=*
2) When a highway goes thru a building you need to add the tag tunnel=building_passage, not simply put the way up in the air with layer=1 for then the question is: Where's the bridge?
3) You did not connect the way to the way's it was crossing. This should have given you warnings during the edit but since you put the road in the air with layer=1, again a bridge was indicated as missing.
4) Why were the tags from the old pronto soccorso route not matched on the new PS route? Is everyone allowed to use this new way? Is the ambulance to wait in line for common traffic?

(use www translate service if you don't understand my comments).

cheers
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-08 14:15:07+00:00): Hey richlv,

I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969742117/history is marked as service way. I think this should be marked as residential, similar to the way to the north of it.
(It's possible there were access restrictions on this way segment. If so, tag them with the relevant access tags you can find on the wiki.)

Regards,

Daniel
richlv (2021-08-08 15:59:02+00:00): Heya, thank you for checking.
If these were separate, named streets, "residential" would be a good fit indeed - otherwise, I'd stick with "service".
In our recent mapping party here we didn't get to these streets - will check with locals :)
FraukeLeo (2023-02-28 09:15:45+00:00): Ganz sicher, dass https://osm.org/way/3185806 zwei lanes hat? Im Luftbild sehe ich vier :) Ist ja nicht schlecht, lanes einzutragen, aber bitte zutreffend und nicht irgendwas, ok?
osmviborg (2021-08-02 09:55:39+00:00): Indiskutabelt findes der en markvej på stedet. Den var markeret som 'privat'. Hvorfor så slette den? På et tidspunkt bliver den sandsynligvis gentegnet.
GIS Sønderborg (2021-08-02 10:16:19+00:00): Klart, der er jo også vej rund om ejendommen samt markveje flere steder i nærheden, som er ikke indtegnet. Ifølge markejeren er de generende at folk opfatter den vej som en gåtur rute.
osmviborg (2021-08-02 11:37:53+00:00): Hvorfor sætter markejeren ikke bare et skilt op. Vejen forsvinder jo ikke fordi den ikke længere er i OSM.
eggie (2021-08-02 10:37:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. 
Alle begin is moeilijk.
leisure=pitch kan beter op een vlak. Ik heb wat aangepast. De tennisclub staat nu op de adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
freeExec (2021-08-02 16:02:02+00:00): Зачем вы добавляете tracks если все пути нарисованы?
abakus_uploader (2021-08-02 22:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2021-08-02 10:39:42+00:00): Dag Rient  Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me een prima aanvulling.

MVG
eggie
user_1566574 (2021-08-03 16:56:01+00:00): (Attention aux majuscules sur les clé, comme ici avec Gender https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8971983114 – ça a son importance :/)
HellMap (2021-08-15 21:40:20+00:00): Sveiki! Vai tourism=attraction tiešām ir nosaukums "OGRE"? Dabā šeit nekādu uzrakstu nav. Tūrisma info arī nekur tāds nav norādīts (piem. https://www.visitogre.lv/lv/kulturvesture-un-arhitektura/547/mols-pie-ogres-ietekas-daugava)
Anrijs Terauds (2021-08-16 08:13:53+00:00): Labrīt!
Tad aizejiet lūdzu uz vietas un apskatat rūpīgāk.
Thierry1030 (2021-09-18 19:24:18+00:00): where does the name 'tunnel F2 Bru-Gent' come from? if it makes reference to the cycle highway, that can't be here because the cycle highways are (for the moment) only in service in Flanders (and not yet in Brussels)
OsmAnd_Pieter (2021-09-20 19:38:07+00:00): yes, needed to be a Note tag of course.
Thanks for signaling.
maraf24 (2021-11-22 09:55:19+00:00): Budynki w budowie.
maraf24 (2022-01-31 20:45:00+00:00): Ten ocałał: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100918226
Ciekawe dlaczego.
wkdgs (2021-08-04 11:11:58+00:00): Existiert der Weg tatsächlich nicht mehr oder ist er nur nicht mehr benutzbar?

Falls er noch existiert sollte er nicht gelöscht werden. Er kann ja irgendwann wieder benutzbar werden.

Dafür gibt es die Lebnszyklus-Präfixe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
mtbbo (2021-08-19 11:37:58+00:00): exstiert nicht mehr. eingang ist auch  druch einen zaun versperrt
user_12625593 (2021-08-20 14:52:13+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, er is wat discussie over je aanpassing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2810338 . Wellicht kun jij uitsluitsel geven over de naam van deze brug.
JeroenHoek (2021-08-20 16:01:15+00:00): Bedankt voor tip, ik heb het gepoogd toe te lichten.
user_12625593 (2021-08-20 16:24:56+00:00): Top!
user_12625593 (2021-08-20 16:26:56+00:00): Helemaal duidelijk en uitgebreid, ook mooi dat je de oude brug als back-up hebt laten staan/liggen. Soort versiebeheer :-)
eggie (2021-08-02 10:43:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Dit is niet correct.. Een bollard staat meestal op een node (knoop) verbonden met de weg.
access=no is bijna altijd fout. 
motor_vehicle=no is default
foot en bicycle yes idem. 
moped en mofa =yes is dan weer wel nuttig. 

Kijk even op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_13860305 (2021-08-02 11:35:10+00:00): Deze heb ik gewijzigd naar een bollard als node, met horses, moped en mofa yes. Dank voor de begeleiding.
gendy54 (2021-08-02 12:30:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Juste un petit conseil. Quand un magasin est fermé, il est d'usage d'utiliser le tag shop=vacant plutôt que de supprimer la clé shop car l'objet se retrouve alors orphelin de tags primaires.

Bonne jounée.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-08-02 12:45:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ce précieux conseil qui nous aide à nous améliorer.

Bonne journée

Cordialement,

L'équipe DB
eggie (2021-08-02 10:47:03+00:00): Beter niet algemeen taggen access=destination kan beter weg. 
Specifiek taggen motor_vehicle=destination is voldoende.
moped en mofa = yes??? 
Die ziet osm als motor_vehicle.
Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109022296

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-02 11:05:09+00:00): agricultural=yes toegevoegd..
traffic_sign=NL:C1 toegevoegd.
access=destination verwijderd.
Staat er een bord uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer?

Kijk hier welke tagging bij de verkeersborden hoort.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring
MVG
eggie