piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PasqualeD (2022-09-05 11:38:10+00:00): Ciao chiedo scusa per il ritardo, rimando a te (se possibile) la correzioni dell'errore, grazie ancora scusa per qualche giorno d'attesa.
BCNorwich (2022-08-26 16:27:02+00:00): Hi, The County Council indicate that both sections are open for use.
eggie (2022-08-26 15:42:16+00:00): Hoi...  Zouden die stukjes woonerf op het parkeerterrein zelf niet beter higway=service met service=parking_aisle kunnen worden getagd?

Groet
eggie
ParkingAMS (2022-09-01 09:16:25+00:00): Ha Eggie, eens. Heb het aangepast.
eggie (2022-09-01 13:38:18+00:00): Top!
user_15552334 (2022-08-27 07:06:57+00:00): Reduce it single cities omfg
RaccoonFederation (2022-08-28 15:29:38+00:00): Sorry but that would be impossible
nlme (2022-08-28 23:11:55+00:00): Actually, a changeset across a country is absolutely fine - see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 22:56:53+00:00): should be per city lmfao
eggie (2022-08-27 13:10:47+00:00): Dag Cees.. Volgens mij klopt het weer zo.
Groet
eggie
mapperich (2023-03-15 19:12:09+00:00): I guess you're wrong here. wiki says about railway=subway_entrance: "...Name of the exit if it is known. Not the name of the station..."
eggie (2022-08-26 15:16:56+00:00): In dit geval kun je beter access=no taggen, want dat permit werkt denk ik niet.
Dat past dan nog het meest bij de situatie..
en dan nog microcar=yes, want brommobielen mogen er ook door. .. en formeel horse=no
gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-26 15:18:38+00:00): Zo ging voor je edits de routering al correct... 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.0089%2C4.3256%3B52.0092%2C4.3265#map=18/52.00931/4.32728&layers=N
Adam Franco (2023-02-22 02:37:30+00:00): This seems like a pretty short section of limited-access to classify as a motorway. Maybe maintaining highway=trunk + expressway=yes would better capture the situation.
Adam Franco (2023-02-22 02:37:23+00:00): This seems like a pretty short section of limited-access to classify as a motorway. Maybe maintaining highway=trunk + expressway=yes would better capture the situation.
user_2066394 (2022-08-26 15:35:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760037469
Gesamtreihung würde man mit building=terrace erfassen, bei einzelner Erfassung dann building=house
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dterrace
geo-d (2022-08-26 15:56:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Den Haustyp habe ich entsprechend geändert.
redd (2022-08-31 14:05:46+00:00): Hi hierundda,
danke für deine Aktivitäten auf OpenStreetMap und insbesoiendere in Hassfurt. 
Du hast leider city und postcode verwechselt. Bitte um Korrektur.
Vielen Dank,
redd
lefuturiste (2022-08-26 19:56:30+00:00): This changeset is completely useless? Like it moving a node a few centimeter?
Warin61 (2024-01-30 05:52:31+00:00): The path Way: 1089492851... it cross the rail way line ... mist be either under ground or on a bridge... It also crosses a retaining wall...
bamghi (2022-10-01 06:48:31+00:00): Das da Lago existiert, Resto Athen wurde geschlossen, falscher Poi bearbeitet!
RobertH-PUM (2022-08-26 18:52:23+00:00): Not accurate at all. There is a massive viaduct here for the motorway. It's impossible that the DC61 to be over it.
Rudolf Mayer (2022-08-27 09:30:21+00:00): Sorry, i was at the wrong road indeed, thanks!
segubi (2023-05-02 14:31:45+00:00): Bitte das Name-Tag nicht für die Beschreibung von Dingen verwenden. Eine Option ist, einen Änderungssatz mit der Bitte zur Überprüfung zu markieren, evtl. mit konkreten Fragen zum Vorgehen. (Don't use the name-tag for describing things if it isn't the official name. )
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Kein_Name
redd (2022-08-31 14:06:20+00:00): Hi hierundda,
danke für deine Aktivitäten auf OpenStreetMap und insbesoiendere in Hassfurt.
Du hast leider city und postcode verwechselt. Bitte um Korrektur.
Vielen Dank,
redd
redd (2022-08-31 14:08:31+00:00): Hi hierundda,
danke für deine Aktivitäten auf OpenStreetMap für Sand.
Du hast leider city und postcode verwechselt. Ich habe schon 4 Fehler entedeckt, einer wurde schon korrigiert. Ich bitte nochmal darum, dass du deine Änderungen überprüfst und korrigierst. 
Vielen Dank,
redd
multimodaal (2022-08-26 20:57:43+00:00): + source= kadastrale kaart (water voor nu -bij gebrek aan recente luchtfoto met het water of BGT- afgebakend obv de nieuwe kadastrale percelen per woning.
Adam Franco (2023-02-22 02:36:50+00:00): This seems like a pretty short section of limited-access to classify as a motorway. Maybe maintaining highway=trunk (or other class) + expressway=yes would better capture the situation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
Frans S (2022-08-28 10:16:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125415126
muchichka_s (2022-08-26 17:33:48+00:00): Привіт
В постанові "полкУ", а не "полкА"
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 14:13:48+00:00): Hi, why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089513278 as leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089529589 as leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian? They look similar in the aerial view. I wonder if leisure=horse_riding is appropriate for such a flat area, compare wiki.
Cylocke (2022-08-29 13:18:52+00:00): The riding area imo is for practice, and for warm up prior to entering the main racing arena - but if you think they should both be the same then that is fine - I was just using my best judgement based on the grounds. a Riding area is just a more general term whereas racing is spoecific.
Hufkratzer (2022-08-30 21:21:45+00:00): The difference between leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and leisure=horse_riding is not that one is for practice or warn up and the other for competition. The difference is that leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian is for just the riding areas and leisure=horse_riding is for the whole facility including stables and other stuff, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916315775
Hufkratzer (2022-08-30 21:29:18+00:00): and https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?map=17/40.73315/-77.93085
Hufkratzer (2022-08-30 21:31:58+00:00): last link fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?#map=17/40.73315/-77.93085
Cylocke (2022-08-31 14:26:30+00:00): sorry, i edited it to your preferred tag - i actually thought this was in reference to a fair area where I designated that difference. Not sure why this one was an arena, possibly just going too fast. If either need updated further then please just update them.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-01 07:26:32+00:00): I'm not sure I understand this completely. Don't you think this area should be called "arena"? Compare https://www.arenas.ebarrelracing.com/ohio/wb-ranch-and-arena-swanton-oh/
Cylocke (2022-09-01 13:18:27+00:00): just change it yourself pls - I only know it as a simple ring for riding a horse casually. if you have more knowledge about it, please edit. I'm only mapping rural areas in NW PA that usually don't have much mapped. If you are a horse ring expert, change whatever you need.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-02 07:14:57+00:00): It is ok then and dosn't need to be changed. If in iD you search for "riding ring" you get the preset with name "Horseback Riding Arena" which adds the tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian.
SekeRob (2022-08-26 17:48:43+00:00): Sent a note the the original mapper with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116379106#map=13/41.3431/13.6385 asking for comment and explaining why his hard-mapped path top of other ways was removed

Standing by.
yasslay (2022-08-28 11:59:03+00:00): Hello!

You are able to turn left onto Church Road from East Street. The no left turn sign is for the one way street which comes after the junction with Church Street.

Kind regards,
yasslay
yasslay (2022-08-28 11:59:14+00:00): Church Road* apologies.
Land-o Calrissian (2022-08-30 00:08:20+00:00): Hi yasslay, thank you for your feedback.  Are you saying that the no left turn sign just east of the intersection between East Street and Church Road is actually for Orchard Place?
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-30 18:48:10+00:00): Please refrain from using the description tag to advertise your services
archpdx (2022-08-26 18:08:04+00:00): Hi,

Please note that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). In this case, this should be unabbreviated to 'South Highway 170' or 'State Highway 170'
OnTracDave (2022-08-26 19:30:04+00:00): I just hired some drivers and our business use a navigation app called Circuit. Circuit does not recognize S. Highway 170 and plots it in downtown Canby or Beaverton. Our new drivers don't know what to do so they end up returning the items to the warehouse, hence creating delays in our shipment. Also, Google Maps does not recognize Highway 170 so addresses on that street cannot be found.
Allison P (2022-08-26 20:04:22+00:00): "South Highway 170" is the correct name. Mail is addressed on that street name. It does not matter if your software is malfunctioning. Also, Google Maps is full of errors, sometimes even more than OSM.

Canby-Marquam Highway should be alt_name, and South Highway 170 the name. Hope this helps.
jodd (2022-11-14 19:45:15+00:00): Hallo Elch12,
warum hast du denn den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141484620 zu einem designierten Rad- und Gehweg gemacht? Das Stück Straße ist kein Geh- und Radweg, sondern normale Straße.
VG jodd
eggie (2022-08-26 23:17:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-26 23:23:50+00:00): Tip Beter geen wegen splitsen met editor iD als er routerelaties over lopen. De routedelen gaan dan door elkaar.
Gebruik dan editor JOSM .. Die id daar wel voor geschikt.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

MVG
eggie
31415ter (2022-08-27 06:53:56+00:00): Ha Eggie, bedankt voor het welkoms bericht. 

Ik zal kijken naar de JOSM editor om dit in de toekomst te kunnen verkomen.

Groet,
31415ter
eggie (2022-08-27 07:03:20+00:00): Yep... het zit 'm vooral in dat knippen met iD. Soms gaat het goed, meestal verkeerd. 
JOSM zorgt dat de sortering van de delen op hun plaats blijven.
De route S109 heb ik hersteld.  
Wellicht zat die 'fout' er al in. 
Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-28 10:08:41+00:00): Hvala za ovu izmenu. Interesuje me - kako si znao vrednosti za interval u duration?:) Pitam posto se slazu (u minut) sa vrednostima iz mog programa (https://gitlab.com/stalker314314/gtfs-osm-validator), pa da pitam jel ga i ti koristis ili je slucajnost u pitanju?:)
Srdjan023 (2022-08-28 13:11:09+00:00): Da, testiram nesto sa njim.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-28 15:59:38+00:00): Da sam znao da ce ovo da koristi jos neko, napisao bih lepse uputstvo za startovanje/koriscenje:F

Ako treba neka pomoc, ili mislis da nesto moze bolje/drugacije - slobodno me cimaj!
ivanbranco (2022-08-28 18:05:29+00:00): Ciao, all'interno dell'area hai mappato il parcheggio dell'area ospedaliera e c'è una centrale elettrica. Sei sicuro sia un landuse=residential?
user_5359 (2022-08-28 08:13:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089524040 (one of eleven objects). What ist the meaning of the tags
objectid = 9125
rd20full = BYSHRE BKWY BARRIO LOGAN
route = 1
(no OSM keys on the way)?
pkoby (2022-08-28 11:22:14+00:00): Thanks for the catch! Those are from the reference I'm using for bike infrastructure. I must have accidentally copied some of those lines into the database. Removing them now.
andrewwiseman (2022-09-06 23:45:07+00:00): ¡Hola YuritzyMarinGranados!
Noté que ha agregado access=permit a algunas carreteras en Zitacuaro, como en esta edición. Mi colega le envió un mensaje antes sobre eso preguntando por qué y no recibió una respuesta.

Tengo curiosidad por saber por qué estas carreteras deberían tener acceso = permiso mientras que las carreteras conectadas cercanas no lo tienen. La definición de esta etiqueta se especifica en esta página de políticas de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit). ¿Es esta etiqueta apropiada para estas carreteras?

Pregunto, porque las fuentes que citaste no proporcionan evidencia que pueda confirmar.

La forma en que están las carreteras ahora está provocando que las rutas se bloqueen en estas áreas, lo que no creo que sea correcto.

¡Gracias por sus contribuciones y espero tener noticias suyas!
skquinn (2022-09-05 03:00:56+00:00): Are you sure that's 5218 Redstart Street next to 5230? Seems more likely that would be 5226, with 5218 being two more houses over.
Evan Carroll (2022-09-06 00:39:28+00:00): I'll fix that. I am in agreement. Good catch.
Evan Carroll (2022-09-06 00:42:01+00:00): Actually, I'm not going to touch this now, I'll flag it and check it again in person. I entered in 99% of these numbers when I was in front with street complete of the house and other proprietary maps are showing the same thing.
mueschel (2022-08-27 08:45:47+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here - there are 125 objects without any valid tag, e.g. this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089532277

Could you have a look?
JuliusOne (2022-08-27 20:37:02+00:00): Hi,
Indeed, those objects should never have made it to OSM's servers.  They are part of the raw data I used to draw the buildings.
The objects have been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125456380
Thanks for the feedback
hackthemap (2024-07-21 17:51:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! You changed the driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219223924/history but highway=service should not have an address and a name only if it is signed as such, but here it's a private driveway without signage, only the building or an address node (or a POI) should have an address. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
I removed the address information from it.
Happy mapping!
andrewwiseman (2022-09-06 23:44:43+00:00): Hello YuritzyMarinGranados!
I noticed you have added access=permit to a few roads in Zitacuaro, such as in this edit. My colleague sent you a message before about that asking why and did not receive an answer.

I am curious why these roads should have access=permit on them while nearby connected roads do not? The definition for this tag is specified on this OSM policy page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit). Is this tag appropriate for these highways? 

I ask, because the sources you cited do not provide evidence which I can confirm.

The way the roads are now, they are causing routing to be blocked in these areas, which I do not think is correct.

Thank you for your contributions and I look forward to hearing back from you!
andrewwiseman (2022-09-06 23:44:49+00:00): ¡Hola YuritzyMarinGranados!
Noté que ha agregado access=permit a algunas carreteras en Zitacuaro, como en esta edición. Mi colega le envió un mensaje antes sobre eso preguntando por qué y no recibió una respuesta.

Tengo curiosidad por saber por qué estas carreteras deberían tener acceso = permiso mientras que las carreteras conectadas cercanas no lo tienen. La definición de esta etiqueta se especifica en esta página de políticas de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit). ¿Es esta etiqueta apropiada para estas carreteras?

Pregunto, porque las fuentes que citaste no proporcionan evidencia que pueda confirmar.

La forma en que están las carreteras ahora está provocando que las rutas se bloqueen en estas áreas, lo que no creo que sea correcto.

¡Gracias por sus contribuciones y espero tener noticias suyas!
ghia (2022-12-23 23:14:34+00:00): Hi,
These are illegal roads. They were removed from the map for that reason!
As visitor of the Sonian Forest, you have to follow some rules and one is to stay on the allowed paths (foot, bike, ...).
One may not create new paths (or helping creating them by mapping).
Please do not remap such ways and let them die.
Kind Regards,
Gerard
0xc4 (2022-12-23 23:47:51+00:00): Hi Gerard,

It’s my understanding that the map should reflect the reality of the world, not what the world should look like. If a path exists, we should try to map it. But if riding a bike (or walking) on it is forbidden, then we should tag it with the corresponding access=no tag. (And not remove it) Am I mistaken ?
ghia (2022-12-24 09:15:12+00:00): Map what you see, was a great principle at the start of the map, when it was very young. Now the map is mature and some problems arise, especially in nature areas.
Some restraining in what to have visible on the map is needed.
For background you may reed the comments on these changesets (in Dutch).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96185603
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96486722
As a conclusion from the meeting after the visit at the terrain, it has been decided to map these illegal roads with the disused tag. So, they are mapped and in the database but not visible. 
I hope for your understanding.
Kind regards,
Gerard
Thierry1030 (2023-05-15 09:00:50+00:00): hello 0xc4,
you added in 2022 this track that was blocked by fallen trees.
I modified this track into disused:highway=path + access=no, so that it won't be visible anymore on the map and so that routeplanners won't navigate via here.
Let me explain you why we work like this:
the administration that manages the Sonian Forest asked the Belgian OpenStreetMap-community in 2022 to check all the paths in the forest. Like you prbbably will know, some paths are dedicated for pedestrians, cyclists, horses etc. Some "paths" are also meant to be permanently closed, so they eventually become overgrown and de facto non-existent.
Do you understand this? Is it possible to pay attention to this in future?
If you still have questions you can contact us at community@osm.be or you can also email the Sonian Forest administration: dkuborn@fondationsoignes-stichtingzonien.be
Thanks for your cooperation
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:11:15+00:00): Hello.  In addition to my previous comment:
 Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125421008
PT-53 (2022-08-27 05:48:50+00:00): Hallo JayPaths,
Du hast diesen POI-Knoten überarbeitet.
Doprt war ja mal die Raiba untergebracht. Aber ist dort heute immer noch ein Geldautomat ausgestellt (atm=yes).
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
JayPaths (2022-08-30 07:36:53+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
Ich habe diesen Knoten, wie, glaube ich, schon bekannt ist, über die Android-App StreetComplete bearbeitet. Diese fragt einen nur spezifische Fragen und zeigt nicht alle Informationen über die jeweiligen POI-Knoten an. Deshalb ist mir dieser unaktuelle Eintrag entgangen. Es befindet sich demnach kein Geldautomat mehr dort.
Dankende Grüße (Für den Hinweis)
lefuturiste (2022-08-28 12:04:15+00:00): Bonjour, Bienvenu sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour ta contribution.
Cependant j'ai remarqué qu'il y a un soucis dans une relation de restriction de no turn : cette relation n'a qu'un seul membre il en faut deux pour qu'elle soit valide.
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:45:46+00:00): Leider hier wieder. Warum trägst du eine Industriestraße als Wohnstraße ein?
Bitte schaue dir 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice nochmals genauer an und korrigiere deine Änderungen umgehend! Vielen Dank!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125421486
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:45:59+00:00): Leider hier wieder. Warum trägst du eine Industriestraße als Wohnstraße ein?
Bitte schaue dir 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice nochmals genauer an und korrigiere deine Änderungen umgehend! Vielen Dank!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125421486
ElliottPlack (2022-08-26 19:56:48+00:00): meant to say adding some greenery around the APG triangle near the power plant
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:30:30+00:00): Hallo, du verwendest hier als Changeset-Kommentar "strasse hinzugefügt", gibst aber lediglich ein paar Gebäuden einen Namen ohne weitere Informationen. Könntest du bitte in Zukunft auf sachliche Kommentare achten?
Siehe bitte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Und welchen (wichtigen) Zweck haben die Gebäude, dass sie einen eigenen Namen verdient haben? Ist es eine Firma? Falls ja, bitte auch so eintragen.

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Vielen Dank.
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:27:55+00:00): Hallo, du verwendest hier als Changeset-Kommentar "strasse hinzugefügt", gibst aber lediglich einem Gebäude einen Namen ohne weitere Informationen. Könntest du bitte in Zukunft auf sachliche Kommentare achten?

Und welchen (wichtigen) Zweck hat das Gebäude, dass es einen eigenen Namen verdient hat? Ist es eine Firma? Falls ja, bitte auch so eintragen. 

Vielen Dank.
VictorIE (2022-09-02 09:02:15+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9980513072

This is tagged: not:operator:wikidata=Q638098 but: operator=Royal Mail

Is the "not:" bit a typo?
fitzsimons (2022-09-04 17:26:22+00:00): That's odd; the wikidata tag was added by OSM! Sorted now I hope!
VictorIE (2022-09-04 20:06:25+00:00): The iD editor prompts three options:
* Upgrade the tags
* Tag as not the same "Royal Mail"
* Ignore this issue

You might have clicked the middle one, which is "NOT" Royal Mail.
gis_shafter (2022-08-26 20:23:38+00:00): *Edit - 23 houses and 1 garage
Allison P (2022-08-26 22:06:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit! Please square the buildings by selecting them and hitting 'Q'. Also, the garage should not have an address tag. Only one feature should have a particular address on it.
gis_shafter (2022-08-26 22:21:16+00:00): Thanks for the tip Allison. I've made those adjustments to this change set.
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
BCNorwich (2022-08-28 19:19:27+00:00): Hi, This is an unclassified highway as verified by the County Council and various Ordnance Survey Maps. Please don't corrupt OpenstreetMap's verifiable data by changing the way status to suit your own agenda.
aceman444 (2023-03-24 22:25:26+00:00): Hi, what was the point of separating the address from the building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109456976 ?
aceman444 (2023-03-24 22:29:04+00:00): And even removing important tags like "ref:minvskaddress".

You just started with OSM and already think you can improve complicated objects like train tracks? Sadly you are just doing collateral damage alongside them as pointed out in other changesets too.
spelledwrongdotuk (2022-08-26 20:57:13+00:00): Opening hours from this sign: https://www.flickr.com/photos/196297230@N06/52313388569