piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapper999 (2022-09-18 22:07:49+00:00): Hallo maction, 
sicher, dass das so stimmt? Das Ab- und Auffahren von der L 560 in die Lorenzstraße scheint, soweit ich das von der L 560 aus gesehen habe, möglich zu sein.
Für solche kurzen Sperren (ca. 4 Wochen) ist allerdings sowieso fraglich, ob man mit dem Eintragen in OSM nicht mehr Schaden als Nutzen bewirkt (vergessenes Update in OSM nach Ende der Baustelle, Update-Zyklus, insbesondere bei Offline-Anwendungen, gedruckte Karten etc.). Alternative wären conditional-Tags, welche von Routern ausgewertet werden können, sonst aber nicht stören.
Strubbl (2022-09-18 17:27:56+00:00): Hi Antarhei, would it be possible to write English or German changeset comments please?
Antarhei (2022-09-18 17:37:14+00:00): Adding a barrier of metal bollards on one of the streets and completing the roads with information that it is a one-way road.
Strubbl (2022-09-18 17:39:14+00:00): Thank you
Strubbl (2022-09-18 17:41:06+00:00): I removed the name from the bollards. This is already said by the feature barrier=bollard. You can read more about this in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name if you want.
Antarhei (2022-09-18 17:38:28+00:00): Road under major renovation, no date for completion of works
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:10:06+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:10:03+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-18 13:57:28+00:00): Jeszcze był wadliwy tunnel=culvert pod spodem (poprawiłem, dzięki za przypomnienie o tej notce i dodanie mostu)
Antarhei (2022-09-18 17:38:10+00:00): Addition of designation as a fully traveled local/gravel road
mcliquid (2022-09-20 08:59:26+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM Austria. Would you mind writing your changeset comments in english when editing in Austria? Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2022-09-18 16:10:10+00:00): Hello LoveandPeace99,
Thanks for your contributions, but please try and use better descriptions than "a" every time.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-09-18 16:10:22+00:00): 你好爱与和平99，
感谢您的贡献，但请尝试使用比“a”更好的描述。 请参阅 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments 。
此致，
安迪
Niiepce (2022-09-18 15:18:40+00:00): Hallo,
Wieso verwendest du hier wieder den name Tag für Bäume, die keine Eigennamen haben. Bei name=Apfelbaum bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, dass das nicht deren Eigenname ist.
Dieses Thema hatten wir doch jetzt auch schon des öfteren, oder?
Und ich hatte dich auch bereits gebeten, bei der Behebung deiner Fehler (die jedem, besonders am Anfang mal passieren) mitzuhelfen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121646738
Jedoch ist das anscheinend bezüglich der Bäume mit Eigennamen nicht passiert trotz expliziter Bitte mit Hilfestellung (Link zum Finden aller Verdachtsfälle für diesen Fehlertyp)
Ich würde mir wünschen, dass du dir diese Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=tree?uselang=de mal genau durchliest und dann beim korrigieren mithilfst, damit wir das Problem gemeinsam beheben können.
Vielen Dank für deine Zusammenarbeit
user_9648254 (2022-09-19 04:10:15+00:00): Ich habe bewusst ein unscheinbares Objekt an einen unscheinbaren Ort so geändert, um dir eine Falle zu stellen, damit ich sehen kann, dass du mich ständig kontrollierst und wahrscheinlich andere auch.
Und du bist mir voll in die Falle gelaufen, denn um so einen Fehler zu finden, muss man gezielt auf die Suche gehen, denn dieses veränderte Objekt findet man nicht einmal so im Vorbeischauen, sondern nur durch gezieltes Vorgehen. 
Meiner Meinung nach ist das schon eine Neurose, alles und jeden kontrollieren zu müssen.
Und jetzt sage ich dir in aller Öffentlichkeit und Deutlichkeit, dass damit umgehend Schluss ist, denn du hast hier nicht die kleinste Funktion eines Administrators oder eines Kontrolleurs. Und sollte das so weitergehen, werde ich drastischere Schritte einleiten, damit dein kleines perfides Spiel ein Ende hat.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-18 14:38:22+00:00): Please use smaller changesets.  This series of changesets spams the changeset history for many countries, not just Russia (I was trying to look for recent edits in China; that's how I discovered this mess).
iWowik (2022-09-19 03:50:37+00:00): SomeoneElse, what application do you use?
mueschel (2022-10-01 17:27:22+00:00): Hi,
this looks like some large import of farm areas. Could you point us to the documentation of this import, the new keys you used here, the source of the data?
See also: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
somix (2022-09-18 17:42:29+00:00): Hi! When mapping a building, after drawing the roof outline, please move the building to its foundation so that it is where it really is.
eggie (2022-09-18 15:43:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eastender (2022-10-03 12:47:40+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure about the postcode change from CF14 5DU to CF14 5YP for Marks & Spencer in this changeset? I can see that CF14 5DU is the postcode specified on the M&S web site but it is not in Code Point Open and it appears to be a postcode that was made obsolete in 2002. M&S is using CF14 5YP in its FHRS entry. So, I think the M&S web site might be wrong. For those reasons, I think the correct postcode is CF14 5DU. Could you please have a look at this again to see if the postcode in OSM should be changed back to CF14 5DU. Thanks.
Joe-w (2022-10-03 13:11:53+00:00): Hi, yes I agree with your reasoning. Amended in changeset 126937990. Thanks!
Hufkratzer (2022-09-19 13:17:55+00:00): Hi, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095635904 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095635905 are surely not horse race tracks (too small for horse racing) but riding arenas, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena. In iD there are different presets available.

Additionally, the tag leisure=horse_riding belongs to the whole area of the poney club (incl. riding arenas and buildings) and not to just one building like on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203362789. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655360196.
filu (2022-09-19 14:07:02+00:00): Thanks, fixed.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
VictorIE (2022-09-19 07:08:57+00:00): Hi,

What does this untagged line represent? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23548265

There seems to be an unnecessary double node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1324401086#map=19/51.88573/-10.42472
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-01 12:02:47+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper,
Please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap like this.
If you need a test server you can create an account at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Best Regards,
Andy
Bravo Mapper (2022-10-01 18:50:52+00:00): Alright dear andy.
I forgot to delete it .
mapowicz_pl (2022-09-18 15:14:46+00:00): A daloby sie, zebys dodawal highway=bus_stop
do przystankow, bo z tego co widze, bez tego taga nie wyswietlaja sie na mapie osm, a dodatkowo na wiki pisze, ze ten tag jest wymagany
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
pebepebe (2022-09-18 16:02:56+00:00): o tego nie wiedziałem, poprawiłem wszystkie które dzisiaj dodałem (mam nadzieję że nie pominąłem żadnego)
mapowicz_pl (2022-09-18 16:20:33+00:00): Super, bo chyba na podstawie tego taga, osm interpretuje ten punkt jako przystanek. A chcialoby Ci sie jeszcze przejrzec te zdjecia i tam gdzie widac, dodac dodatkowe tagi typu, czy jest wiata, kosz na smieci i lawki. Tagi typu, czy jest oswietlenie, to raczej na zdjeciach nie widac. Zastanawiam sie, czy nie dodac z automatu tagu o wypustkach na przystanku, bo z tego co kojarze, na wszzystkich przystanakach, do ktorych dodalem uwagi, takich wypustek nie bylo.
Jesli nie chce Ci sie przegladac ponownie, to ja moge dodac te dodatkowe tagi.
pebepebe (2022-09-18 16:36:29+00:00): to dodawałem od razu (wiatę, kosz na śmieci i ławki) - powinno być OK
GinaroZ (2022-09-20 15:45:29+00:00): Thanks but all of these places are already mapped, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100913753 so I've reverted the changeset.
fghj753 (2026-05-16 09:04:07+00:00): Hi, i was informed in changeset/181469346 that swinging benches like node/10033959359 should be rather tagged as bench:type=swing instead of playground=swing . Might be useful to know as there are more such benches appearing across city
Zverik (2026-05-16 16:48:49+00:00): Yup, I absolutely agree. Even tried to add it to the default presets, but that got rejected: https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1490
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 11:04:42+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 11:04:47+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 11:04:55+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
baptistemm (2022-09-18 15:47:15+00:00): Oups, sorry for size of the upload
wireguy (2022-11-08 12:07:54+00:00): bhietsch, can you check mount skokomish?  seems to be a broken relation
bxl-forever (2022-09-18 18:19:36+00:00): Hello,

I think you attempted a mechanical edit here.  Those are discouraged for a good reason.

This pub in Leuven, Belgium, is named "Seven Eleven" and has nothing to do with the 7-Eleven brand.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4502597432/history

Please undo your changes.
Thanks in advance.
baptistemm (2022-09-19 16:04:42+00:00): change reverted, thanks for the notice
adiatmad (2022-09-19 02:21:05+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Is the Taj Mahal classified as landuse=residential? (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/5699259)
literan (2022-09-26 20:55:25+00:00): не надо, пожалуйста, хаотично менять статусы дорог, обрывками.

ознакомьтесь с документом: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

правку откачу, как совершенно немотивированную. Основные дороги в Мособласти давно настроены, выходите с предложениями на форум, если есть аргументы.
eggie (2022-09-18 18:11:42+00:00): Beste Henk...
Alle begin is moeilijk. Je wandepad begint en eindigt in het niets. Geen aansluitingen.
Bovendien zeg je access=no Dus verboden toegang. Dat kan beter weg.
Bicycle en horse = no horen niet op een wandepad.
Dus waar begint en eindigt pad?

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-09-18 21:11:03+00:00): Pad heb ik doorverbonden.. Aangepast naar highway path.. losgemaakt van de landuse en access=no verwijderd
Wellicht bij de school nog checken hoe het pad precies hoort te lopen.
Groet
eggie
ElliottPlack (2022-09-22 17:53:20+00:00): Hi there, this edit removed a designated trail name and converted a track to a path. This goes against the local convention for highway=track in Baltimore City reservoir property. Any fire road should be tagged as a track. The use of footway is discouraged for any off-street path. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maryland/Baltimore_Reservoir_Watersheds before mapping in the watersheds.
DUGA (2022-09-22 18:55:48+00:00): Are you sure that there is a fire road…?

This is quite interesting because I was on site and literally nothing is there.
ElliottPlack (2022-09-22 20:58:16+00:00): I took a look at my old run through and see where the issue is. At some point the track was merged with a larger trail. Only the straightaway section that comes off DV Rd is a track, the rest is path. It is important because horses are only allowed on the track sections.

As for the path tag, it is the preferred tag for woods paths/trails, whereas footway is meant for pedestrian features near road. There is a lot of nuance to that, I apologize, but it is well known/documented. I fixed the one section of track and left the rest alone here.
mcliquid (2022-09-18 17:20:45+00:00): Consider using waterway=stream. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream
Patrik Eschle (2022-09-18 18:21:27+00:00): Danke, fixed - ist lange her seit meinem letzten Bächlein und der Stream ist auf deutsch so counterintuitiv.
Kennst du die Gegend? Die Wege nördlich des Kaiserilochs scheinen mir noch konfus. Einen habe ich heute getrackt, aber muss es mir nochmals ansehen.
mcliquid (2022-09-19 11:05:18+00:00): Hi, leider keine vor Ort Erfahrung. Ich habe die offensichtlichen Wege optimiert. Fraglich ist für mich nur noch dieser Bogen hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095672472

Man kann auf Strava einzelne Nutzungen sehen, aber das könnte auch eine GPS-Verschiebung sein.
Patrik Eschle (2022-09-19 11:10:58+00:00): Den Bogen habe ich am Sonntag getrackt. Es gibt dort einen Weg, 3m breit, uneben. Aber der Querweg unterhalb des Stoggenbach kommt mir im Nachhinein seltsam vor - Grund für einen weiteren Besuch.
gscholz (2022-10-16 06:19:27+00:00): Hi Kraan46,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting linese:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=69.14718&lat=32.90120&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126339025

My impression is you have "flatten" some buildings which originally had a circular shape. Can you please fix this?

I am wondering how this error could be uploaded as JOSM typically shows error messages if you try this. Are you aware of its internal validator?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
Kraan46 (2022-10-16 06:53:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for reporting. I have checked this changeset with JOSM and using the Mapathoner plug as usual i do not see what you mean. In this project there were no round buildings that needed to be changed in square buildings. The buildings in this project here were mainly all long narrow ones, some not with square angles. Can you send me screenshots of what you found. For me all is fine here.
Kraan46 (2022-10-16 06:58:06+00:00): At second view there were indeed 4 (really this message for 4 minor errors) to be fixed. Thanks anyhow.
gscholz (2022-10-17 04:51:37+00:00): Thanks or your response, and I hope you can avoid these kind of errors in the future. You can find them every day brand new in central Africa.
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-19 05:55:00+00:00): Hi ElectroGeorge,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=15.18090&lat=40.14805&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126339065

These kind of errors irritate routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
ڕاستی (2022-11-05 15:20:01+00:00): سڵاو بر، لەبۆ ئاگاداریت ناونیشانی شەقام addr:street بۆ گەڕەک زیاد ناکرێت و شتێکی زیادە. لەگەڵ ڕێزی زۆرم
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126339108
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
emersonveenstra (2022-09-20 11:47:48+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced several overlapping paths, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095679972 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086301947. In OSM, you can't have overlapping ways, so would you mind fixing them? Thanks!
eggie (2022-09-18 19:26:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community