piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-20 22:41:43+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You requested a review of this.

Thanks for adding all of this detail, all helpful stuff to have, and it looks like you've tagged things correctly.

Couple of comments:

For apps and things to route along paths it's important that they join up with other paths, e.g. at the end of this path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908955191

The warnings you had about paths highways crossing waterways should be fixed, e.g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908955145/ it looks like the path is a bridge for part of it, so you should split the path up and tag the middle bit as a bridge.

There were a few paths there already, which may need to be adjusted, but again it's important to incorporate them, and not duplicate features next to them, e.g. at this bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250691098/
nevw (2021-02-20 04:17:48+00:00): Hi
Please map the full street name. Abbreviations are not used in the OSM.
nevw (2021-02-20 04:20:46+00:00): OSM wiki naming conventions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
G1asshouse (2021-02-21 08:58:31+00:00): Was the deprecation of <site>=* scheme for social media discussed some place? Could you provide a link to it as I haven't been able to locate where a  discussion took place?
Mxdanger (2021-02-22 17:13:28+00:00): The tags of the non-prefixed <site>=* has not yet been deprecated, however the very low tag usage and consensus with other members on the Discord, we decided to help with reducing the defragmentation by updating them to reflect the current documentation on the wiki.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-22 19:53:44+00:00): For info, automated edits must follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .  It's good that you had a chat with some other people on Discird about it, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans does say where things should be discussed, and I've not heard anyone suggest that Discord is the "standard communication methods for the territory affected by the change".
Best Regards,
Andy
mweper (2021-02-24 12:11:02+00:00): I have asked the same question in the South American changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99705879
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
StefanHRT (2021-02-20 04:30:45+00:00): Ergänzend: Die 2 Bilderspuren von eserte auf Mapillary weisen da noch öfter ein 30Km/h Schild auf (auch teils mit der zeitlichen Beschränkung)
!bm (2021-02-20 17:39:57+00:00): Wie kommst du drauf, dass die Straße einem Ort zugeordnet wäre? postal_code=*? Hatten wir da nicht zuletzt die Diskussion @Stammtisch, dass der nicht unbedingt sinnvoll ist? Die Zuordnung zu Orten kann über den (langen) Straßenschlüssel erfolgen. Oder hat dich name:etymology:* verwirrt – das sagt nur, wie es zu dem Namen kam.
!bm (2021-02-20 17:41:08+00:00): Für zeitabhängige Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen: maxspeed=* und maxspeed:conditional=* taggen.
StefanHRT (2021-02-20 18:24:38+00:00): Hallo bm, bin da heute mal komplett lang und habe Bilder gemacht, passe das dann an sobald die Bilder hochgeladen sind. da stimmen einige max-speed nicht. Und ja, bin da etwas verwirrt gewesen mit dem Altlandsberg, gut zuwissen.
StefanHRT (2021-02-21 05:40:39+00:00): Moin bm, Danke noch einmal, die ganze Landsberger Straße ist jetzt angepasst. Gruß Stefan
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-21 02:55:18+00:00): It doesn't exist on the map, and why do you put it on the map, why don't highway=proposed?
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-21 02:55:40+00:00): So I removed and reverted your changes right now.
Hans Thompson (2021-02-20 19:18:28+00:00): This is interesting.  I corrected an N street that was in osm as North Street just few blocks away.
Allison P (2021-02-20 20:52:46+00:00): balrog-kun expanded all predirectionals and suffixes, but just assumed that letters were always supposed to be directions. This is still an issue all across the US, though someone did fix all occurrences of this error in California and I've fixed many across the country.
amuppidi (2021-02-20 04:58:36+00:00): added self-storage plus rental off of route 50. added service roads off of vance rd
Mahdi Aghashiri (2021-03-12 14:25:42+00:00): این مسیری که ایجاد کردین مسدود شده است و پل جدید افتتاح شده است
laflovver (2021-10-05 08:34:35+00:00): 
Hello ZeLonewolf thanks for improvement osm data, but in this changeset u made a mistake by merge wrong nodes
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:31:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
topius (2021-02-20 10:28:38+00:00): If you want to mark the area around a church, please use the tag landuse=religious. The way you have been marking these areas currently is as church buildings, but the building tag should only be applied to the buildings themselves. Also, campsites are areas where tourist put up tents, not work camps.
MxxCon (2021-02-21 05:42:33+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what data did you use as basis for your edits? Some of your changes can't seem to be confirmed from the available satellite imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99627043
Hanif Al Husaini (2021-02-26 14:46:22+00:00): Hi. I used the MTA's website (https://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/Subway_FAQ:_Facts_and_Figures) which says that the NYC Subway uses 625 V DC, and it also matches the existing tagging.
Hanif Al Husaini (2021-02-26 14:47:40+00:00): Sorry, that was not actually MTA's website
MxxCon (2021-02-26 17:02:53+00:00): I was referring to the changes of some of the rails and junctions, not electricity tags.
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-22 15:27:31+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99627382
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-22 15:28:23+00:00): Hi wlf_editor, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
abakus_uploader (2021-02-20 23:31:05+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
RicoElectrico (2021-02-24 09:08:54+00:00): Rozwiązałem uwagę pewnie zgłoszoną przez Ciebie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2552047
W razie pytań śmiało pisz na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 jeśli masz jakieś wątpliwości to je rozwiejemy :)
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-22 15:27:23+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99627088
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-21 14:41:03+00:00): Hello,
One more thing - lots of people have commented at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6232254 .  Please do reply to these comments in changeset discussions!
Best Regards,
Andy
c tito young (2021-02-22 04:25:30+00:00): Hi Andy 

I have been speaking with the person directly. From now on, Ill try to throw in a note in the discussion comments on what is discussed.
urbalazs (2023-11-14 17:17:30+00:00): Szia István! Ez a kápolna 2 évvel ezelőtt került a térképre. Ma jártam ott, de nyomát sem láttam. A jelzett helyen a D50 Kulturális Központ és Hotel van. Biztosan itt kellene lennie a kápolnának?
István Szakadát (2023-11-15 09:25:05+00:00): Nem tudom, én nem voltam a helyszínen. Itt írnak többet: https://miserend.hu/templom/4847
Carto'Cité (2021-04-23 13:40:06+00:00): Bonjour.
C'est quand même un peu étrange un bureau de poste (https://www.osm.org/node/8440023880) à l'emplacement de toilettes publiques, non ? Il semble y avoir un vrai bureau de poste tout prêt, dans la rue du Faubourg Saint-Martin : ne serait-ce pas le même et le signalement Osmose un faux positif ?
Antoine.
zorglubu (2021-04-24 08:01:16+00:00): Effectivement c'est assez incongru. ça sent la correction osmose interrompue et oubliée :-)
La suggestion osmose est correcte, l'ancienne ref a disparu de chez La Poste : j'ai corrigé.
Merci
abakus_uploader (2021-02-20 23:31:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aceman444 (2021-02-23 22:46:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the speed information, but please pay attention to the train and bus relations that run over those rails and roads. When you split a way, always check that the new way is properly placed in the relations. In the JOSM editor it should be easy to check, and it even warns you about the relations the road is part of. Always load the shole area around the road you are going to split, so that the relations load too. If you only load roads/rails using some filter (e.g. Overpass API), the relations will not load and bad things happen. Sadly you have damaged train routes in Wien in this way. I'll fix some, but please pay more attention next time, thanks.
pitfire (2021-02-20 09:20:49+00:00): Hallo Heiner,
kann es sein, dass Du den Gipfel nochmals gesetzt hast.
Gruß pitfire
pitfire (2021-02-20 09:25:58+00:00): Sorry, der wurde schon vor vor 11 Monaten von Teiti doppelt gesetzt.
juminet (2021-02-21 19:15:48+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Si vous désirez mieux cartographier un centre médical (regroupement de plusieurs médecins), je vous suggère d'utiliser le tag amenity=clinic (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic), ainsi que d'ajouter votre site web, les horaires, etc. comme par exemple ce centre médical https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845842636.

Bien à vous, 

juminet
BAK365 (2021-02-22 16:37:02+00:00): Hallo, dies ist eine Waldfläche. Kannst du deine Änderungen an der Relation 3362179, welche du in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97597124 vorgenommen hast, bitte so nachbessern, dass die "Insel" wieder zu Wald wird.
sovereign_ch (2021-02-25 17:18:08+00:00): Gordischer Knoten: müsste vermutlich die Rolle 'outer' haben um gerendert zu werden, darf aber nicht 'outer' sein, da innerhalb der 'outer'-Begrenzung der Relation. Die Rolle 'inner' ist auf jeden Fall falsch.

Was passiert, wenn man w895819739 aus der Relation nimmt? Ausser die Fehlermeldung "untagged way" natürlich. Denke ausprobieren, warten und hoffen, dass niemand auf die OSMI-Fehlermeldung anspricht.
BAK365 (2021-02-26 11:43:30+00:00): @sovereign_ch: Genau, ein gordischer Knoten. Oder eine Knacknuss: eine Insel in einem Loch wie hier [1] beschrieben, wobei das Loch von mehreren sich berührenden inneren Ringen gebildet wird.

Deinen Vorschlag finde ich gut, das Problem ist nur: das hatten wir schon. Wenn wir w895819739 aus der Relation nehmen, machen wir einfach die Edits von @Map47 rückgängig und stellen den status quo ante wieder her [2].

Ich habs mal so versucht, in CS 100045851: Ich habe einen neuen Weg um die inneren Ringe gelegt und diesen - anstelle der bisherigen Einzelflächen und anstelle von w895819739 - als inneren Ring in die Relation eingefügt [3]. w895819739 kriegt wieder das Attribut landuse=forest. Ich hoffe, so klappt es.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon#Insel_in_einem_Loch
[2] http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3362179
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911203874
sovereign_ch (2021-02-28 15:11:27+00:00): Gratuliere, dürfte geklappt haben – abhängig von der Zoom-Stufe werden die ersten Tiles wieder als Wald gerendert und die QA-Tools haben auch nichts zu bemängeln. Good job :)
BAK365 (2021-02-28 17:58:56+00:00): Danke, auch fürs Teamwork!
swiss_knight (2021-03-01 00:28:18+00:00): Thanks for the invalid geometry fix @BAK365
Basstoelpel (2021-02-24 18:34:41+00:00): Dear PoppyMercuryID,

please give a changeset comment that is helpful to understand what you intended to do. "Area" is not a sufficient one. It's fine to do that in your language.
Please don't change one type of object into something complete different. So do not change a power line into a railway construction line. If the power line is in fact demolished to free the space for the line (which I doubt in this case), you should use the life cycle prefix to the objects not existing any more (like demolished:power=line) and create a new object to the feature in construction. Please give the source of your changes, neither the railway construction nor the voltage change are visible in any aerial images.

Greetings,

Baßtölpel
Basstoelpel (2021-02-24 18:35:59+00:00): I've reverted this chageset, I don't see any change worth to keep.

Baßtölpel
PlaneMad (2021-02-23 18:19:24+00:00): Hi Naveen, your edit added a large building polygon for the CMA area. Reverting this and adding it again with more suitable tags and not touching other road features.
PlaneMad (2021-02-23 18:47:23+00:00): Have added it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12353813
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-20 22:49:48+00:00): See my other comment about surface
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-20 22:48:59+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and  it looks good to me.
It's surprising that it's unpaved, but you seem to have local knowledge of that. Maybe there's a more specific tag that could be used? See here for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

You seem to have done lots more mapping nearby too, which is great. Just a comment, make sure you always square the corners of the buildings (right click, square, or 'q') as it makes everything much neater. I've been through and done that for you on most of the houses in the immediate area here.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-20 22:49:38+00:00): The comment about unpaved was meant to go on your other changeset, but the squaring corners definitely applies here.
Warin61 (2021-02-28 23:41:12+00:00): Hi,

Way 907615451 (wood) has no area - it just forms a line. I have deleted this way. 

The 'imagery used' should state the source for the information used in the changeset. OpenStreetMap (Standard) could not be the source for this change. Possibly Bing imagery ... or a personal survey or something else?
Ana Luisa (2021-02-26 09:47:46+00:00): Hi,
ich habe gesehen, dass du die Straße und Hausnummer des Adress-Tags geändert hast. Jetzt liegt der Punkt aber noch an der alten (falschen) Stelle. Oder hat dies besondere Gründe?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-20 13:41:54+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifica (e altre analoghe) mi sembrano edit (semi-)automatici non discussi sugli appositi canali. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits Puoi venire su talk-it a parlarne? Grazie, Andrea
_Andrea_ (2021-02-20 14:20:34+00:00): Ciao Andrea, ho aggiunto manualmente operator:wikidata per gli elementi che riportano nel tag name o operator la dicitura Carabinieri, Polizia di Stato o Guardia di Finanza. Gli elementi dubbi o non chiari non li ho toccati. Fammi sapere se sono necessari ulteriori chiarimenti o se è necessario proseguire su talk-it. Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-20 15:30:23+00:00): Ciao Andrea, secondo me si classifica come edit semiautomatico. Meglio proseguire in ML. Inoltre, se la cosa fosse concordata, potrebbe diventare una buona pratica per tutti (da documentare sulla wiki). Grazie, Andrea
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-22 15:26:53+00:00): Just a test?
CTLarsson (2021-02-22 18:15:25+00:00): Just at test at my first use of Vespucci. Thought I removed it already...
CTLarsson (2021-02-22 18:18:35+00:00): Well - I can't find in iD editor anymore.
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-23 07:26:49+00:00): You already removed it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99636371
user_5359 (2021-02-21 19:23:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node over 100 meters, please check the position. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6315159951
BCNorwich (2021-02-21 10:00:21+00:00): Hello, Please understand that if features are visible on the ground (by any means), then they are valid features for mapping to OSM. Even if they are private roads inaccessible to the public. Because a route is closed and fenced off is not a justification to delete it. I've therefore reverted your deletions.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 20:15:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8440455233/history has amenity = playground that was added in this edit
Maybe leisure=playground was supposed to be here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground

If yes, then it would be likely beneficial to retag it to that standard value. If using amenity= is intentional - what was meant here?
rab (2021-02-20 13:47:11+00:00): hi ftcat, @SColchester, 
do you need a helping hand? First thing I do handling with such bad data, is to search for insane short ways and delete them right away. This will give a good starting point for further manual corrections. Alternatively it might be a good idea to ask the dwg if they can help.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
ftcat (2021-02-20 14:34:43+00:00): Hi rab,

I make corrections as I know the area fairly well. I make maps for my Garmin device from OSM data and when I spot some glaring errors I come to OSM to try correct them. I have a pet gripe regarding the HOT projects in general as the mappers usually are novices, I know you have to start somewhere but it results in masses of really poor data, not to mention squared off district boundaries and dragged nodes something I am sure would not happen in Europe or other developed parts of the world. The real problem is the validators are not necessarily much more knowledgeable than the mappers. Also after an enthusiastic start excitement dies down and the mess is left. I know they think they are helping but like many of the aid projects in this part of the world the people providing the aid feel good but the benefits on the ground are negligible at best and harmful in many situations. Chibombo District is a favourite for the white Land Cruiser aid organizations as it is close enough to Lusaka that they can be home with their satellite TV and pubs and restaurants after a hard day in the rural areas. You don't find as many in the Gwembe Valley or far North Western Province. Although the current project is in connection with Chibombo District much of the mapping is taking place in Chisamba District which was created from part of the Chibombo District quite a few years back., much of what is being mapped is historical as the satellite imagery is many years out of date, much of it in this area at least 2 years out of date and possibly more.
rab (2021-02-20 15:49:54+00:00): Unfortunately, this is true. The pace on these projects has already slowed significantly. Once forgotten, the data remains untouched for years. And whenever a new beginner project is needed, the same procedure is repeated in another district.
ftcat (2021-02-20 16:04:11+00:00): C'est la vie in Chisekesi as we say in these parts.
Mammi71 (2022-08-01 15:52:46+00:00): Hallo Tsschaeck,
#Remstalblick ist aber nicht der Name des Kontrollpunktes, sondern der daneben am Boden liegenden Luftbildkarte.
Tschaeck (2022-08-01 18:17:35+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,
ist jetzt etwas schwer zu sagen (da ja doch schon 1 Jahr alt). Ich hätte behauptet, dass auf der Beschreibung für diesen Kontrollpunkt auch etwas wie Remstalblick gestanden hat.
Wir können aber auch gerne den Namen dort entfernen, falls er dort falsch ist.
Mammi71 (2022-08-01 19:39:50+00:00): Als ich von dort aus Paddeln war, hab ich am Kontrollpunkt keinen "Namen" gesehen und auch hier ist nichts verzeichnet: https://www.lgl-bw.de/unsere-themen/Geoinformation/Kontrollpunkte/kontrollpunkt-weinstadt-gartenschau/
Tschaeck (2022-08-02 16:42:32+00:00): ich hätte jetzt gerade den Namen rausgemacht, habe aber gesehen, dass du den Punkt schon weiterbearbeitet hast.
Dankeschön.
eggie (2021-02-20 12:49:15+00:00): Dag John Welkom terug bij OSM.. Geef svp expleciet aan wat je hebt gedaan hier.
MVG
eggie
John Hielema (2021-02-20 12:50:17+00:00): Mijn huis aangepast, ik heb een uitbouw aan het huis
eggie (2021-02-20 13:00:50+00:00): Oke duidelijk.. Je werkt met de juiste editor.. Best klastig om mee te beginnen...  Er lag op de omtrek een lege way.. geen ramp. Die heb ik verwijderd. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-20 13:03:20+00:00): Mijn edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99640438
maraf24 (2021-02-20 17:01:58+00:00): To jest jakaś gra w zgadywanie, co tu jest nie tak?
Mój strzał: droga ekspresowa S25 nie istnieje.
maraf24 (2021-02-20 17:20:08+00:00): Wycofałem.
eggie (2021-02-20 12:54:42+00:00): Als het goed is heeft de validator je gewaarschuwd dat hier iets niet helemaal goed gegaan is?
De lege way zonder verder tags heb ik verwijderd en het gebouw uitgelijnd conform de BGT omtrekgericht,
MVG
eggie
Dino Michelini (2021-02-21 10:37:07+00:00): Da qualche settimana sto notando che stai modificando la zona del lago di Bracciano. Non sto qui ad elencare i molti problemi che stai combinando, in particolare cancellando strade già mappate e facenti parte di route hiking ed mtb consolidate. Tra le tante route che stai distruggendo oltre a quest'ultima del “Cammino delle Terre Comuni” potrei citare quella del Giro del lago. È evidente che non fai nessuna attenzione a queste cose. Quindi, ti prego di rimettere quanto prima apposto le route e per il futuro fare molta più attenzione nel mappare. Viceversa, sarò costretto a segnalare la cosa al DWG e chiedere il blocco.
Antanicus (2021-02-21 17:40:48+00:00): Ciao, ti ho risposto in privato. Non ricordo di aver cancellato strade in questo changeset, a meno che la cancellazione sia conseguenza del fatto di aver unito due tronconi di strada in uno solo. Se fosse questo il problema, chiedo scusa e sono a disposizione per rimediare.