piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:31:18+00:00): Ekkora süketeléseket, amit te most is leművelsz…
Érdekes módon a kitérők és vágányszámok a legtöbb helyen már megvoltak (lásd Dunakeszi).
Az ország többi részén lévő széttagoltság ugyanúgy érdekel engem, mint az itteni is, csak amíg más helyeken minden probléma nélkül össze tudom vonni (lásd Érd állomás, ahol még meg is köszönték), addig itt egy önfejű folyamatosan szabdalja szét.
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:42:21+00:00): Állításod szerint te a vágányszámozás miatt daraboltad fel a vágányokat. Ha valóban így lenne, akkor az helyes eljárás lenne, de te nem ezt csináltad.

Nagymaros állomás hózentrógere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307995971
Nézd csak meg figyelmesen a történetet: te ezt a vonalat a vágányátszelésnél indok nélkül ketté vágtad. Semmilyen vágányszámozást nem végeztél, csak ketté vágtad.
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:46:57+00:00): A name és a track_ref címkékkel látom, hogy továbbra se boldogultál. Ahelyett, hogy a hibásan kitöltött name paramétereit átemelted volna track_ref-hez inkább alt_name címkéhez raktad át, ami szintén helytelen.
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:48:59+00:00): Sok helyen azzal érvelsz, hogy máshol is így használják. Hát akkor ott is helytelen. Nem is egy esetben kellett törölnöm helytelen címkéket, és akkor is az az illető, aki szándékosan szórta szét a hibás címkéket, blokkot kapott, csakúgy, mint ma te.
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:50:17+00:00): Úgyhogy erről ennyit az önkényeskedésről, mert valahogy a te szerkesztéseid száma mégis kevesebb, viszont te többször lettél blokkolva.
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:51:24+00:00): Ui.: Ja, azzal még mindig nem dicsekedtél el, hogy Dunakeszin az állomás kezdőponti oldalán lévő csonka vágányt miért is kellett megcsonkítanod...
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:57:18+00:00): Ja, elfelejtettem megkérdezni. Elmondanád, mik azok a nyíltvonali vágányok, amiket korábban írtál?

Hisz a nyílt vonal az nyílt vonal, nem számozzuk őket. De egyébként ahogy látom, te sem számoztál nyíltvonali vágányokat.
Supaplex (2022-11-18 17:10:41+00:00): 有可能是地是他們的，可以移到 operator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129085014
DressyPear4 (2022-11-18 16:54:45+00:00): Olá, não é correto adicionar uma via sobrepondo uma já existente, veja mais aqui
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129085313
flohoff (2022-12-07 09:40:02+00:00): Moin,
ich bin gerade über die Zonen-Fahrradstraße gestolpert - Cool. Wusste gar nicht das es das gibt. 

Was mir nicht so klar ist ob das sinnig ist das auf die "service" roads fortzusetzen. 

Service roads sind ja Privatgrund, deshalb tagge ich da maxspeeds und co nicht weiter weil ja am Ende nicht die StVO gilt oder?

Z.b.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32889451

Flo
DeFra85 (2022-12-08 20:59:37+00:00): Ich weiß gar nicht ob das wirklich Privatgrund ist? Auf TIMonline haben die Zufahrtswege eigene Flurstücke. Aber als highway=residential würde ich sie jetzt auch nicht ansehen.
Sind highway=service eigentlich immer in privatbesitz? Denn service=alley wird mir in ID als Gasse angezeigt
flohoff (2022-12-08 21:12:35+00:00): 
Also service ist eigentlich definiert als auf Privatgrund, Firmen, etc. Ich mache das ziemlich strikt genau so. Öffentlich -> residential und co, privatgrund -> service. 

Und es gibt ja mehrere identifikationsmerkmale. Hat es offziell einen Namen. Also steht der im ALKIS? Weil nur öffentliche Straßen werden gewidmet d.h. bekommen einen Namen. 
Oder stehen da Straßenlaternen? Ist eigentlich auch nur auf öffentlichen Straßen der fall. Wenn nicht ist es sehr Wahrscheinlich nicht öffentlich und ich würde es zu einem Service machen. DANN gelten aber eben die Vorschriften der StVO nicht. Auf deinem Privatgrund darfst du so schnell fahren wie du magst (Macht bei einer Hauszufahrt natürlich keinen Sinn). Und ich halte "service" + "name" für in fast 100% der Fälle für einen Fehler. 

Ich kenne eine Stelle wo das richtig sein könnte, da gibt es aber eine Historische Entwicklung. Ehemals öffentliche Straße durch ein Firmengelände, heute zum Firmengelände gehörig.

Flo
DaveF (2024-08-06 09:46:14+00:00): Hi
The note tag is valid & useful on MP relations as it deters others from adding tags to the ways, or even worse, deleting them.

Please refrain from making any similar amendments.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465468413/history
jeslop (2022-11-18 13:21:39+00:00): Hello Fab City Global.

What is this exactly? I'm going to revert it,  doesn't provide any information.

Regards

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
E de Wit (2022-11-18 14:28:46+00:00): Hi,

Are there any cycleway signs that have been changed recently?
Because G11 cycleways in The Netherlands are supposed to contain:
mofa=yes
moped=no

-E de Wit
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-11-20 14:13:01+00:00): Hi! 
We received feedback from our customer that he couldn't drive here. So, if this the common tagging in the cycleways in Netherlands, I can get the tags (mofa=yes; moped=no) back.
E de Wit (2022-11-20 21:11:28+00:00): For moped's that's certainly true if the cycleway is G11 signed.
The road 'Haskerveldweg' is a 50km/h through-route, I think it's unlikely the municipality forces mofa's onto it for safety reasons unless the situation changed recently.

There are no government publications (mijnoverheid.nl) available about roadwork / lowered speed about the Haskerveldweg.

I'll get the tags back.
Thanks for improving OpenStreetMap :)

-E de Wit
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-11-21 05:10:13+00:00): Thanks a lot for your help!
DressyPear4 (2022-11-20 01:17:12+00:00): Olá, a tag para identificar subestação seria 'power=substation', você também pode adicionar uma nota no mapa para identificar o local, assim seria mais fácil visualizar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129086082
traveleditor (2022-11-18 23:31:43+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contribution! You help make the map better for everyone! Just a little tip for the next time, please save/upload your changes before moving on to another country. Have a nice day
Lejun (2022-11-19 04:50:09+00:00): Ha, should have been clearer in the comment. This is a patch for a large changeset from a few days ago. Most of it was ok as it was unmapped buildings but not properly squared, and there was an issue with a road, probably due to a missclick on the other side of the Earth.
AntMadeira (2022-11-18 14:50:12+00:00): Hello ep_sn.
Can you explain if this is a spot for 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragliding

or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeflying

Don't you need a plane to do freeflying?


Regards.
AntMadeira (2022-11-18 21:50:52+00:00): Ok, I noticed it's related to this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying

Please, add the specific sport practiced there, if you know them.

Regards,
António.
abakus_uploader (2022-11-18 23:32:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
balint36 (2022-11-18 13:36:44+00:00): Méltóztatnál egy kicsit is odafigyelni, amit írok? A name címke nem arra való, mint amire te használod.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
Oha80 (2022-11-18 14:32:12+00:00): Nincs egységes elrendelés arra vonatkozóan, hogy a "name" címkét hogyan kell használni.
balint36 (2022-11-18 15:12:02+00:00): Ha hajlandó lennél rákattintani a linkre, amit beküldtem, akkor láthatnád, hogy létezik. Innentől minden ilyen változtatásod önkényes és szabálysértő.
Frans S (2022-12-07 09:28:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are fine !
just a remark. Never connect nodes of roads to other features, here you connected nodes of a hedge to a road. These are errors and need to be corrected.
When you need to add a node next to another object, use the Ctrl button down and add the node. 
When you map a hedge which is part of 2 pieces of land, use there just 1 piece of hedge. don't map 2 hedges close to each other.
Best regards and keep mapping
gscholz (2022-11-19 08:04:22+00:00): Hi Doston AKTM,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways and connections between highways and power lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=63.54821&lat=42.00651&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129087885

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-21 06:12:54+00:00): Hi Doston AKTM, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Cristoffs (2022-12-04 11:57:47+00:00): Good work with mapping in Somalia. Please don't mark hedges as area object. This designation is reserved for completely overgrown areas.

Thanks again!
Joseph R P (2022-11-20 01:50:41+00:00): Hello, I just want to let you know that I've changed most of this heath to desert because heath isn't typically found in southern Nevada except for in the mountains or by water. A lot of the desert landscape in southern Nevada consists of gravel and yucca plants like Joshua trees alongside the shrubbery that falls under the heath category.
eggie (2022-11-18 16:57:05+00:00): Hi Nasstassia...  This residential has changed indeed.. but it's now a G12a cycleway all the way to the south.

Look here for tagging cycleways un the Netherlands.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

I corrected the present situation. 

Greetz,
eggie
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-11-20 14:23:40+00:00): Hello! 
Thank you very much for your corrections and pointing to the OSM Wiki article. I really appreciate it. Sometimes we get feedback from the user, where he does not send us photos of signs, and sometimes there are not enough sources.
Thanks for your corrections!
Xvtn (2022-11-28 22:54:12+00:00): Main Street was tagged according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions -
Specifically, not including the directional prefix in the primary `name=` tag. Generally, signage doesn't include it, and locals don't include it verbally.
Anton Valodzin (2023-05-15 12:53:36+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the clarification!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129089312
balint36 (2023-01-29 13:58:21+00:00): Itt szintén voltak helytelen nyiszálások, ami mellé hibás vágányszámozás is társult.
gscholz (2022-12-18 07:24:46+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=80.46805&lat=6.69205&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129090013

Can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-27 06:09:10+00:00): Hi Grannymeg, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-19 08:48:19+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
here is again an error you have added to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=26.14187&lat=39.81155&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129090230

Can you please fix this and it would be highly appreciated if you could improve your mapping style to avoid and repeat such errors agan and again.
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-22 09:26:45+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
meanwhile I have fixed your error.

Most probably you will like to educate yourself about how to use the changeset discussion feature we have:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Changeset_Discussions

Guido
NieWnen (2022-11-18 14:50:47+00:00): *Kwiatów Polnych
Strubbl (2022-12-02 14:59:41+00:00): Hallo soerface, 
deinen Beitrag im Forum habe ich gerade gelesen. Daher hier ein kurzes Feedback zu dieser Bearbeitung.
Man könnte außer dem amenity=pharmacy noch diejenigen Tags vom Gebäude entfernen, die nur für die Apotheke gelten. Die gehören ja auch nicht mehr an das Gebäude.

Viele Grüße
Sven
soerenwegenertc (2022-12-02 15:40:18+00:00): Hey Sven,

danke dir! Hab ich gleich mal gemacht, hier das Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129649220

"Opening Hours" ist vielleicht auch noch doppelt, aber ich kenn hier die Gegebenheiten nicht um sagen zu können, ob man in das Ärztehaus selbst auch rein kann und da ggf. noch andere Läden sind.

Schöne Grüße,
Sören
Strubbl (2022-12-04 18:06:46+00:00): Ich danke dir. Das schaut gut aus.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-18 16:13:33+00:00): Hi,

Could you please make your changesets not span as large of an area? It makes it impossible to check your changesets for mistakes when they are spread out like this. Thanks!
gpserror (2022-11-21 19:11:07+00:00): I spotted a mistake in this changeset, and who knows how many more.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8234272754 was dragged to an improper spot.  I was about to fix it but this is a systemic problem.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-21 19:26:54+00:00): Yeah, i've seen errors from these massive changesets too. I'll try to message them or escalate it
gpserror (2022-11-22 01:34:13+00:00): For my needs I find this to be a serious violation, curious what the policy on fixes/reverts should be on things like this?  Would be nice to make sure this doesn't happen again, even if it's pretty easy to do accidentally especially in iD if one has a slow machine.  In fact I wish the iD developers speed up scroll performance to help prevent things like this...
emersonveenstra (2022-11-22 02:00:45+00:00): I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129217516, they're still ignoring my messages so i'm going to contact the DWG
marczoutendijk (2022-11-22 09:22:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6555
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
GMoney0805 (2022-11-23 01:28:07+00:00): My sincere apologies, I am not on the site as often as I used to be, hence the reason for not responding to the messages. I am a career mapping technician, however my apologies for not being consistent. I will make an effort to improve. Thank you
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 14:53:39+00:00): Thanks, generally it's a good idea to save and start a new changeset whenever you move to mapping a different state or different part of a state, that way people don't get notified if your changeset doesn't actually touch anything near them.
eggie (2022-11-18 16:22:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
joost schouppe (2022-11-23 16:37:05+00:00): Hoi Breko,
Je schijnt de omgeving hier goed te kennen. De Kanaalweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34771822 lijkt hier grotendeels gesloopt te zijn, en er is een nieuwe aansluiting bij de Mondeolaan. Jij kan het wellicht beter fixen dan ik vanop afstand.
Britzz (2023-02-13 22:17:52+00:00): Vous avez ajouté ce P vélo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10199808273), j'imagine suite à la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3425187 puisque 15 jours après, mais sans fermer celle-ci, c'est dommage. Ceci dit, merci pour le travail fait par GéoVélo dans OSM.
alix_geovelo (2023-02-14 09:16:46+00:00): Bonjour

Merci pour le suivi :)

En effet cela ressemble à un oubli (ou bug?à) lors de la clôture. 
Je vais remonter les notes traitées ce jour pour vérification.

Merci à vous pour le suivi plus global des notes et des contributions, je vois souvent passer votre compte  :)
RedEyedVireo (2022-11-23 13:40:01+00:00): Hi,

Although this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115259523 shows up on the 2021 MassGIS Orthos, it was demolished in spring of 2022 after falling into disrepair.

Thanks,
RedEyedVireo
Yury Yatsynovich (2022-11-24 23:16:22+00:00): I've just deleted it. Thanks!
legofahrrad (2022-11-19 21:11:11+00:00): Hallo!
Der von dir hinzugefügte Punkt hat nur einen Namen und keine weiteren Eigenschaften. Worum handelt es sich denn bei diesem Punkt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10199811563
Das war ein Fehler in StreetComplete, dass nur der Name eingetragen wird, das ist aber mit dem neuesten Update wieder behoben.
Viele Grüße!
birderfreak (2022-11-29 09:34:00+00:00): ist geändert.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-11-19 17:05:09+00:00): Not sure you really need to add this. highway=living_street should already allow walking.
Apirnus (2022-11-21 05:49:02+00:00): By default the set of tags are general=yes but other tags are undefined. I see the situation as basically like when the last time you mentioned the crossings where I forgot to put yes tag for pedestrians and/or cyclers where applicable.
I'd say same is here because marked pedestrian and cycling crossing also by default does not have yes tag for pedestrians.
Even more so, wiki about the living street says that "Terms for these street vary considerably around the world." which means that in our case I would set the tags for such roads.
Otherwise I would say highway=cycleway, crossing=marked should already allow walking and does not need explicit yes tag for crossing.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-11-22 18:11:46+00:00): >By default the set of tags are general=yes 

This is what you see in iD editor which you shouldn't really trust, it's a separate piece of software with it's flaws. Not an official reference for tagging.

The reality is that to my knowledge routers do not avoid residential roads when doing on foot navigation. That's why I proposed that you don't waste your time on this. Of course, you can add these tags. Just wanted to save your time :)

As for the cycleways many routers actively avoid routing pedestrians there, since this is usually forbidden by law or just not advised to use a cycleway for walking. For example, OrganicMaps' on foot router will choose footway crossings over cycleways.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-04 15:33:57+00:00): Hi,
If you want to create a tree, use: natural=tree.
I fixed it for you.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129708776#map=19/38.91982/-77.22264
Rom1 (2022-11-22 07:55:48+00:00): Bonjour, pour info, sur ce point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823546758 j'ai enlevé recycling:glass_bottles car c'est déjà le cas sur cet autre point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823546759. À demain pour la rencontre du groupe local ?
PTBRB (2022-11-22 11:36:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement je me suis trompé j'ai mis l'attribut aux deux points.
Et oui je passerai demain pour la rencontre du groupe local.
RVR015 (2022-11-18 16:00:42+00:00): Unable to verify Suphai Island in Bing, Esri World Imagery, Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, Mapbox Satellite, or Maxar Premium Imagery. Reached out to the original editor for verification, but no response. If this delete is an error, please revert the changeset and indicate the imagery used to verify the islet. This helps increase provenance. Thank you!
ratrun (2022-11-19 10:23:28+00:00): Hello!

Can you please improve your mapping such that you connect the nodes to the existing highways? Currently you are producing a lot of unconnectd way errors. Please see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.57497&lat=4.28147&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

Connecting ways is important for routing!

Per default JOSM should give you warnings before uploading, please don't ignore these warnings!
ratrun (2022-11-19 10:27:07+00:00): DeepL French transolation:
Bonjour !

Pouvez-vous s'il vous plaît améliorer votre cartographie de sorte que vous connectez les nœuds aux autoroutes existantes ? Actuellement, vous produisez beaucoup d'erreurs de voies non connectées. Veuillez consulter https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.57497&lat=4.28147&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

La connexion des voies est importante pour le routage !

Par défaut, JOSM devrait vous donner des avertissements avant le téléchargement, veuillez ne pas ignorer ces avertissements !

Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite)
abakus_uploader (2022-11-18 23:32:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
balint36 (2022-11-18 18:54:52+00:00): Lennél olyan kedves, hogy megmagyaráznád, hogy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115276308
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115276305
vágányokat miért kellett egymástól szétválasztanod?
Nyilvánvalóan nem történt vágányszámozás.
wkdgs (2023-01-30 16:20:48+00:00): Hi,

bitte lösche nicht einfach die mühsam eingetragen Daten aus der Datenbank, sondern versuche die falsch eingetragenen zu korrigieren.

Die hier eingetragenen Daten (Hauseingang, Hecke und Bäume) benötigen meiner Meinung nach keine vorherige Absprache mit dem Grundstückseigentümer und sind auch hinsichtlich Datenschutz nicht problematisch. Alle 

Ich habe deine Änderungen daher rückgängig gemacht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129094831
gscholz (2022-11-19 08:42:05+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
here is again an error you have added to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=27.16355&lat=39.75797&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129095178

Can you please fix this and it would be highly appreciated if you could improve your mapping style to avoid and repeat such errors.
Guido