piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Friendly_Ghost (2023-07-24 10:17:41+00:00): P.s. I just noticed you were not the one who added it. Nonetheless, it could be helpful to check for this tag. Just a heads-up ;)
Maarten Deen (2023-07-25 06:01:20+00:00): I'm usually even in the habit of removing a tag like that. Without access=no there is no use for car=yes or motorcar=yes.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-07-27 20:55:51+00:00): This tag is actually useful, because it indicates that the charging station is intended to charge cars (and not bicycles, mopeds etc). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#Vehicles for relevant documentation.
Maarten Deen (2023-07-28 06:22:56+00:00): That is backward from the commonly used conventions for access. The access tag is designed to include everything except what you exclude. It is a bit stupid to go to a system where access is none except what you allow.
Furthermore: I'd like to see the day that bicycles have a ccs2 combo plug to charge, so from that point it is useless anyway. And at chargers with a type2 plug, you can use an adapter to Schuko and charge your bicycle. Show me a charging station that specifically forbids charging bicycles.
Trucks and buses my not fit physically, but you'd have to know the location and I've seen buses charge at a generic ccs2 combo station.
So I still maintain it is a useless tag.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-07-28 11:37:08+00:00): It's a helpful tag to indicate the intended vehicle type when you don't know the socket type or don't have time to survey it in detail, but I agree with you that tagging socket types is more informative.
Tomas Straupis (2021-12-21 14:05:09+00:00): Hello. Please stop. Your'e doing incorrect changes and destroying good data. I will revert all of your changes.
kubahahaha (2021-12-23 22:30:09+00:00): Cześć, w tym zestawie zmian oznaczono ten obszar jako budynek poczty prowadzony przez Inpost.
Wycofałem tą zmianę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/713950845/history
nmombo12 (2021-12-21 13:40:45+00:00): Hello JWNORRIS, thanks for your contribution. I know some of the edits at this golf course were made by another user, but I have a note for your future changes. The "name" tag should be used for primary names of features and for the most part should have a sign labeling them. In the case of golf features, to label a tee, fairway, or green as a member of a hole we more commonly uses the ref or description tag. For instance "ref=1" or "description=White 8 Tee"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115210486
pio2_122 (2021-12-21 13:52:28+00:00): Po raz kolejny przypominam, że w przypadku numerów dróg nieoznakowanych w terenie nie używa się tagu ref, tylko unsigned_ref. „Jeśli koniecznie chcesz zaznaczyć, że jest to droga powiatowa lub gminna, dodaj tag unsigned_ref=*”

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Oznakowanie_dr.C3.B3g

W związku z tym, że moje komentarze są i były ignorowane, takie zmiany będę wycofywał w całości.
Kovoschiz (2021-12-22 04:15:28+00:00): What's the purpose of this?
Wright One (2021-12-22 10:52:11+00:00): 個人觀感：喺行人過路處極短位置整複線，睇落怪怪的
user_5359 (2021-12-21 18:14:11+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte nutze die Kommentarmöglichkeiten bei einer Änderungen, damit schneller festgestellt werden kann, was Du geändert hast.

So nebenbei: Kennst Du den Bonner Stammtisch (natürlich derzeit virtuell) https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch? Herzliche Einladung dazu.
eggie (2022-03-12 09:12:01+00:00): Dag Flakkeeenaar..  De polders kun je beter niet als eiland aangeven.
Ik heb het nu deels aangepast naar place=locality
Kijk je nog even ? 
Zie ook opmerking op de kaart.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3078360#map=16/51.7430/4.1160&layers=N
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-12 09:13:59+00:00): Altijd weer een probleem hoe de naam te laten renderen. 
Wanneer je place=locality op een node zet dan zal ook de naam renderen op de standaardkaart. 
gr eggie
aklopau_kontur (2021-12-23 09:54:19+00:00): Hi Badojo

Thanks for your contributing in OSM.
Can you tell about your source of population data? I can't find similar value in https://www.dzs.hr/Hrv/censuses/census2011/results/htm/H01_01_03/H01_01_03.html or https://www.zagreb.hr/userdocsimages/demografija/Kretanje%20ukupnog%20stanovni%C5%A1tva%20Zagreba%20od%20popisa%202011.%20do%202018.pdf
Badojo (2021-12-23 12:21:16+00:00): Hi, no problem

So basically there are two population for Zagreb. The City of Zagreb (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/226224) which is a county consists of Zagreb itself and villages and places like Sesvete for example. It has a 2011 census population of  790,017 and 2019 estimate of around 804,507 (according to https://www.zagreb.hr/userdocsimages/demografija/Kretanje%20ukupnog%20stanovni%C5%A1tva%20Zagreba%20od%20popisa%202011.%20do%202018.pdf).

Zagreb itself (relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3168167 and node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1551865419) has a 2011 census population of 688,163 which can been found here https://www.dzs.hr/eng/censuses/census2011/results/htm/e01_01_01/e01_01_01_zup21.html near the bottom of the page.

Hope it helps
MarcoR (2021-12-22 11:42:30+00:00): Ciao!
Di cosa si occupa "Eclypso Studio"?
Così com'è mappato ora sembra che sia l'edificio a chiamarsi così.

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115211859
tux67 (2021-12-21 15:32:19+00:00): Hi 	Dmithry,

which users Feedback? When you do these changes for Mapbox as a professional contributor with no local view - ensure you provide the right source information.  The Website you have mentioned does not fir to the store you added and the right website should have been added  to the store node. 
On top of this semicolon separated entries for a shop are a bad decision as they are not very precise.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_over-use_semi-colon_separated_values
BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115212050
Dmithry (2021-12-22 14:26:20+00:00): Hello, tux67. Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately, we can't provide you link with user's feedback information , because we use for it our internal tools.At this page of the official website https://toyota-heinsberg.de/ you can find the list of services this POI provides, including car repair services I also added website to this POI.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115212050
vulasala (2021-12-22 04:23:39+00:00): Hi Autoisme,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 1014064760 from unclassified to residential to avoid classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115212191
Russ McD (2022-12-03 06:00:36+00:00): I would be more concerned that the road actually exists ! It crosses from Thailand into Myanmar with no border control, or checkpoint mapped. I live in this area and I assure you that you can not simply stroll across the border on any road.
tomhukins (2022-01-10 16:29:17+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.  I notice the new car park you added at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014066261 overlaps one that already exists at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235098934 - I've combined them both into one car park and added tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115988981

Also I notice the platform you added at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235098931 overlaps the Pullman Buffet at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235098927 - you might want to tidy up the boundaries between these.
syntex (2022-06-07 19:40:09+00:00): Dlaczego są teraz 3 domy opieki Leonard?
Piotr Strębski (2022-06-08 19:30:33+00:00): Bo ośrodek się dynamicznie rozrasta przejmując kolejne budynki magazynowe i przerabia je na swoje potrzeby. Wszystkie jednak działają samodzielnie, w każdym budynku są rozmieszczone osoby o różnym stopniu schorowania Itd. Nie ma właściwie między nimi kontaktu (ogrodzenia pomiędzy są zachowane).
marczoutendijk_repair (2021-12-21 14:37:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 115140023, 115140216, 115140367, 115140883, 115141192, 115166638, 115167242, 115169663, 115170288, 115171019, 115182243, 115182304.
Rico557 (2021-12-22 07:10:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014069746/
xmas:feature=shop + xmas:feature:shop=christmas_tree ?
4004 (2021-12-22 09:40:53+00:00): ну вот не знаю, они вроде не продают, только в аренду
Leo Slager (2021-12-22 11:30:41+00:00): Dag Gijs,
Je hebt hier door het opknippen van ways voor de tweede maal een aantal routerelaties beschadigd.
Met de editor iD kun je geen routerelaties bewerken !  Dat gaat altijd fout omdat de nieuwe wegen altijd achter aan worden ingevoegd in de routerelatie. En dan blijft er een beschadigde routerelatie achter.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de gang wilt gaan adviseer ik je dringend om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Met de editor JOSM kun je routerelaties correct bewerken en worden er geen beschadigde routes achter gelaten.
En ways toevoegen aan een route_hoofd kan natuurlijk helemaal niet !  Daar horen alleen de enkelvoudige routes in te staan.
eggie (2021-12-21 15:21:50+00:00): Dag EeetH  Het gebied van je edits is zo groot omdat je de wegen aan de buurtgrens  hebt geplakt. Die heb ik nu losgemaakt.

MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2023-07-06 21:14:52+00:00): Dwa brody z tego zestawu okazały się mostkami.
Skąd pochodzą informacje o brodach?
B_KSL (2023-07-07 00:02:12+00:00): Różnie. Dużo z tego obszedłem dawno temu i tak pamiętam. Duża część na podstawie zdjęć lub isok. A część po prostu wymyślona. W ostatnich latach tnie się na potęgę lasy, w związku z tym buduje sporo nowych dróg do zwózki. Powstają przy tym nowe mosty/przepusty. Po wysypie nowych prywatnych szlaków, ścieżek przyrodniczych na niektórych pojawiły się mostki czy kładki. I odwrotnie - część dawnych już nie istnieje. Zawaliły się bądź woda porwała. Ogarnąć to żeby było aktualne to prawie niemożliwe. Jedynie jak ktoś ostatnio był, widział, zauważył że się nie zgadza, zostawił komentarz czy uwagę... można poprawiać. Podobna sytuacja z drogami leśnymi. Sporo jest na mapie takich, którymi do niedawna dało się przejechać. Teraz zarośnięte i w praktyce nieistniejące. Część można by już na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych pousuwać. Te w lesie, zasłonięte drzewami muszą poczekać aż ktoś to zweryfikuje i się zlituje i poprawi. Jak inaczej można by do tego podejść?
maraf24 (2023-07-14 13:52:33+00:00): Proponowałbym zostawić nieotagowane. Jak ktoś przejdzie to może poprawi. Szczególnie, że w tych okolicach kwestia brodów i mostków jest ciekawa - występują i brody i mostki w dużych ilościach.
Podobny problem z brodami zauważyłem w okolicy Łopienki- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2966938001 -jest tam zaskakująco duża ilość drewnianych mostków na pieszych szlakach.
nmombo12 (2021-12-21 15:19:08+00:00): Typo, should be Orchard Grove***
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-12-21 18:05:32+00:00): Please don't: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7929708
eggie (2021-12-21 16:19:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Lijkt me correct.. phone heeft als OSM format +31  

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
salisburymistake (2021-12-24 04:43:40+00:00): Hi, just wanted to poke your brain for a bit. I see you're really interested in rail and the like, but I noticed you replaced a bunch of rail infrastructure in Springfield, IL that I had deleted with "railway=abandoned" ways. The flyover I had deleted wasn't abandoned, it was ripped up and hauled off. I watched it, in person, over the course of months. It is entirely gone. So I'm wondering if you're assuming that isn't the case,, or if you KNOW the rail doesn't exist in any shape or form anymore but still want to preserve the history of the rail having been there.
wireguy (2021-12-31 13:22:17+00:00): hi Ray, can you also look at cleaning up these two:
node 9355938273
node 9355938261
they cause crossing highways.
MarcoR (2021-12-23 10:41:40+00:00): Ciao!
Avevi aggiunto il nome "sentro cai 941" ad un bosco; niente di serio, ho risolto il problema.
I sentieri escursionistici (in particolare quelli gestiti dal CAI) vengono mappati usando delle relazioni; è necessaria un po' di esperienza prima di riuscire a farlo senza grossi problemi, quindi ti consiglierei di dedicarti, almeno per le prime volte, alla mappatura di oggetti più semplici :)
Per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici

Buone feste,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115216027
DressyPear4 (2021-12-22 12:53:47+00:00): Olá, adicione um comentário em suas edições para que outros possam entender o que você está adicionando ou modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115216092
MxxCon (2021-12-22 05:00:54+00:00): Hello.
I see that in your edit you used only Mapbox satellite imagery. It is pretty good, however presently in NYC Bing imagery is newer and more representative of the state of roads.
Additionally, you edited Apple store's phone number format. Unfortunately, you modified it to have ( ) around area code. As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage a phone number should be separated only by space or dash. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115217043
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 10:02:43+00:00): Hey,
du hast im Harz mehrere Nodes fälschlicherweise bearbeitet, u.a. hier.
Die Objekte sind alle Ortsteile einer neuen Stadt, somit ist das auch richtig eingetragen gewesen. 
@19timber96 hat das wieder richtig gemacht. Ich würde dich bitten, solche Änderungen, wenn richtig oder nicht ohne örtliche Kenntnis vorzunehmen. Aber das sind Infos, die auch aus der Wikipedia herausgelesen hätten können
IlBano (2022-12-28 16:18:55+00:00): Ciao fayor.
Hai notizie del completamento della rotatoria avevi inserito un annetto fa sulla SP26  a SE di Rosolini  ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014096211) ?

Grazie

IlBano
fayor (2022-12-28 16:26:46+00:00): Ciao, credo non sia stata ancora completata. L'ultima ordinanza scade giorno 31.
http://156.54.128.59/provinciasr/mc/mc_p_dettaglio.php
IlBano (2022-12-28 16:39:36+00:00): Grazie.
Ciao
Josef73 (2022-02-01 20:27:01+00:00): the tag opening_hours for the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9356043229 is wrong. Look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aopening_hours https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9356043229
4004 (2021-12-21 17:40:21+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку!
в осм мы описываем обьекты наборами тегов на английском. например магазин будет комбинация shop=*.
тип здания (building=retail) - это немного другое понятие

то есть название здания как магазин в общем то ничего не даст в плане например поиска магазинов (кроме как по названию).

еще если магазин не занимает все здание, то может быть проще отметить его точкой.
после создания обьекта (точка, линия) в панели слева есть возможность поискать наборы тегов на русском, например поиск по мебель выдаст вам заготовку тегов для мебельных магазинов - и тогда останется только вписать название и время работы.

могу посоветовать вам пройти туториал в редакторе (одна из кнопок на панели справа), эти магазины я поправлю
Dodko (2021-12-21 18:58:32+00:00): Pri oprave adresy je potrebné opraviť všetky 3 riadky, nestačí len addr:housenumber.
Súpisné číslo je v addr:conscriptionnumber
orientačné číslo je v addr:streetnumber
A keďže chybne je to aj v registri adries 
https://paste.pics/FEVD7
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/c/eD71V
tak chybu nahlásiť mestu aby to opravili. Teraz pri volaní na linku 112 pošlú sanitku k nesprávnemu domu.
Cristoffs (2021-12-21 17:39:50+00:00): Cześć! Dobra robota! Zmiany możesz opisywać po Polsku przynajmniej na terenie Polski.
mrpbpl (2021-12-22 09:36:56+00:00): Dzięki! Pierwsza aktualizacja więc i wprawy brak. Dziękuję za wskazówkę.
Cristoffs (2021-12-22 13:43:12+00:00): Nie ma sprawy jak coś zapraszam na naszego Discorda. Zawsze możesz liczyć na pomoc.
user_5359 (2021-12-25 19:36:47+00:00): Hallo! Sieh Dir bitte nochmal das Haus https://www.osm.org/way/675706158 an. Könnte das ein Kopierfehler sein?
skywalker1 (2021-12-25 21:07:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Da war wohl noch was in der Zwischenablge.
kawino85 (2021-12-21 17:27:58+00:00): Is it finally a mechanical edit when you've fixed each school in France one by one? Please do one big edit!
◪ Jarv (2021-12-21 19:17:32+00:00): Just a heads up that putting land use onto roads ways is discouraged as it may cause issues when edits are made to a road, as well as not being correct on the ground.
Landuse edges should be at the highway boundary like how it was
nmombo12 (2021-12-21 18:37:40+00:00): Hello ICU812, thanks for your contribution. Please check out this reference guide for the fairway-green intersection. The fairway should share nodes with the green and not overlap.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115219591
ICU812 (2021-12-21 18:48:56+00:00): Thanks for the headsup, I reshaped the  existing items to fit the 2018 course updates and don't recall doing that but I will go back and make sure they are like you have shown me. Thanks again
ICU812 (2021-12-21 19:03:51+00:00): Okay I connected the fairway and green spline points except for the few holes where the fairway actually goes around/behind the green ... I wasn't sure what to do with those ... thanks again for setting me straight.
nmombo12 (2021-12-21 19:07:52+00:00): Just checked out your new changeset. Looks good. When the fairway goes all the way around you could use just keep it as-is or optionally use a multipolygon. Thanks!
mavl (2021-12-22 15:29:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил статусы дорог. Например, жилые улицы стали нежилыми.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24504592/history  
  
Пожалуйста, смотрите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 20:05:58+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236681 ?
LudovicG (2026-07-23 17:02:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution.
Pour information, je me suis permis de préciser que le fast_food pizza est en fait un distributeur de pizza (vending_machine) comme vous l'aviez annoncé dans le name : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14041938543
lovelyfurball88 (2022-02-10 11:40:39+00:00): Hello, please fix the areas that you marked as "buildings" that are actually outdoor areas.
literan (2021-12-22 18:35:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415477390/history is not official service road.

it's spontaneous road through grass
Henosb (2021-12-23 18:03:51+00:00): way 415477390] crates classification gap between service roads [way 542911419 and way 413449586] that resulted sink islands. [way 415477390] access some service facilities in the area, per service road definition in Russia wiki “A minor road providing primary access to a commercial or industrial facility. See highway=service.”
literan (2021-12-23 19:17:10+00:00): all 'service facilities' in this area are accessible from these roads: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415477394/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413449586

Did you visit this place? Suppose, no. This track road is very dirty rut like this: https://images.app.goo.gl/yyaAS3rELb1jzPau6

I do not know what do you mean "classification gap" - I didn't see this term in OSM wiki
Henosb (2021-12-23 19:57:54+00:00): My bad! I was drafting up a response and accidentally sent that instead. I had been thinking there might have been a data issue here because of the switch from service to track (that's what I meant by classification gap), but after looking at it again I agree with you that the road should be a track like you initially modeled it. Thank you for your close attention to detail in Moscow, and happy mapping!
Frans S (2021-12-22 13:37:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, You missed quite a lot of them.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115220589
4004 (2021-12-28 19:42:24+00:00): hi, could you please confirm why you've added a motor vehicle = destination tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29155723 ? I couldn't remember there being one, and dont see one on mapillary
IslandStyle08 (2021-12-28 22:25:21+00:00): Hello 4004,
Thank you for catching this error, my humble apology for adding the tag, I misjudged this tag. I will remove it promptly. Thank you again for your comment, I appreciate it.
IslandStyle08
4004 (2021-12-28 22:40:42+00:00): Thanks! No harm done, just wanted to check
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 10:05:56+00:00): Hey, wieso existieren jetzt hier 2 Kliniken....?
Ich verstehe nicht, warum du diese Änderungen hier vorgenommen hast?
user_12887748 (2021-12-26 11:05:21+00:00): Ich schätze es ist nicht richtig wenn man eine Klinik als node und way einträgt. Ich werde die Werte der node in den way eintragen. Oder meintest du etwas anderes?
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 22:42:00+00:00): Ne, darauf wollte ich hinaus. 
Das "healthcare=hospital" sagt ja "Hier ist ein Krankenhaus. Und kann entweder durch einen Node oder eine Fläche dargestellt werden. 
Aber zwei Elemente würden ja dann bedeuten "zwei Krankenhäuser"
user_12887748 (2021-12-27 08:10:39+00:00): ja, danke für den Hinweis
highflyer74 (2021-12-21 18:55:55+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Eventuell ist hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden passender. Auch stellt sich die Frage, ob der Insektengarten so heißt (name=*) oder ob es nur eine Beschreibung ist (description=*). In letzterem Fall würde man keinen Namen setzen.

Ein paar nützliche Dinge für den Einstieg:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Schau auch gern mal auf dem monatlichen Bremer Mappertreffen rein. Dieses findet aktuell nur online statt. Weitere Infos dazu findest Du hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community.

Viele Grüße!
canfe (2022-01-03 18:29:22+00:00): Nel numero di telefono non ci possono essere lettere latine. Segui gli esempi della wiki
archpdx (2021-12-21 19:39:14+00:00): Hey there,
Thanks for adding this pond! In the future, please use more meaningful changeset comments - 'update' doesn't help other mappers understand what you are doing. In this case "Added a pond" would be sufficient.
keithonearth (2022-04-27 04:29:56+00:00): Just a quick heads up: A single address should not be duplicated on multiple nodes our building outlines. One address should only appear one time. Josm gives errors if you try to have the same address on multiple objects, and I'm surprised that iD doesn't. 

This changeset added a couple of addresses to multiple objects (building outline, and entrances). I've fixed it, but wanted to explain what the issue was.