piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mirluy (2022-02-22 19:53:53+00:00): Ok gracias voy a buscar videos en YouTube para ver cómo se hace correctamente
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:45:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450088.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-22 23:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AngocA (2022-09-15 20:04:36+00:00): La fuente fue: https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/politica
AngocA (2022-09-27 05:00:02+00:00): Para info de cómo calculé las zonas.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450056.
Kartoit (2022-02-22 23:56:39+00:00): Pahoittelut siitä. Yritin pitää relaatiot ennallaan, kun lisäsin liikenneympyrän, mutta en onnistunut poistamaan Holvastintien haaran välistä aluetta relaatiosta. Oliko siinä muita vikoja, koska näiden bussirelaatioiden toiminta ei ole tuttua ja yritän olla puuttumatta niihin?
Tunturikyy (2022-02-23 16:49:41+00:00): Huoli pois, virheitä sattuu kaikille. Ei näkynyt muita tarkistimeen jääneitä vikoja.
Honey Fombuena (2022-02-23 06:45:28+00:00): Hello! Pls remove shop=yes tag and just replace building = yes with building = commercial. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117737800
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 01:17:32+00:00): Thank you, i really dont know what the heck is up with golfers on OSM, currently.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117737811
mariotomo (2022-02-22 20:55:46+00:00): hola, me sacas de la duda … en el changeset escribes "source=bing", pero por supuesto que las fronteras en el mar no son visibles en las fotos aéreas … y bueno la duda es cuál sería la fuente.
AngocA (2022-09-15 20:04:47+00:00): La fuente fue: https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/politica
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 10:50:56+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure newly adding an already razed highway is good?

If so, please use the "razed:" prefix for razed objects, instead of highway=razed. For instance, this would be: "razed:highway=residential".

Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117738033
bigopenmac (2022-02-22 19:12:06+00:00): Зачем в населенном пункте проставлять всем дорогам скорость 60? Она по-умолчанию тут 60. Знаков нет. Если завтра сделают закон что скорость внутри населенных пунктов 55, то переписывать? Предлагаю перестать это делать (ставить 60 км мксимальную скороксть в населенных пунктах Беларуси)
Aliaksei Verkhaturau (2022-02-23 06:07:46+00:00): @bigopenmac, нужно различать дороги в городе и за городом, а также дворовые зоны. На практике в OSM чаще встречаются числа в km/h или mph. Xотя на случай готовности к переменам можно использовать `BY:rural`, `BY:urban`, `BY:living_street` для 90,60,20 соответственно. Однако это не всегда правильно интерпретируется навигаторами. 
link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
jidanni (2022-09-15 23:17:00+00:00): The straight part of the boundary, does not match the creek. The creek is nearby and not straight. The boundary is the boundary and the creek is the creek.
jidanni (2022-09-15 23:18:10+00:00): That long straight section of the creek is an error!
eggie (2022-02-22 19:14:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
vmicho (2022-02-22 18:39:32+00:00): OK lets remove it ^.^
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450020.
danieldegroot2 (2022-02-22 18:22:33+00:00): PSV/taxi changes;

"Taxi" service way should be a "lanes:psv=1" lane attribute of "Market Yard" (non-seperated).
Besides, inappropriate use of name tag and incorrect location (on the kerb).

amenity=taxi should only be the area taxis wait at, not the area passengers wait at.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450008.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123450004.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
gscholz (2022-02-24 05:33:23+00:00): Hi Naruto 1,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database by shifting ways around:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-6.25930&lat=13.41510&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117739710

I reverted it.
Kind regards
Guido
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123449764.
gscscnd (2022-02-22 19:46:35+00:00): Usunąłeś fragment <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145482746>, przez co ten obszar landuse=residential stał się łamaną otwartą. Poprawiłem w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117742004>.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-25 20:29:04+00:00): Not sure what you were going for here.
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117862061
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117740560
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123449660.
user_12531033 (2022-02-22 19:28:20+00:00): 数据来源：中铁六局丰台站改建工程示意图
FraukeLeo (2022-03-19 15:47:36+00:00): Hallo XTMueller, normalerweise unterscheiden wir zwischen track und unclassified anhand der Beschilderung. Ein Feldweg mit "Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge" und nur "landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" ist highway=track. Das ist bei https://osm.org/way/32730944 der Fall, das ist ein reiner Wirtschaftsweg. An https://osm.org/way/39972558 dagegen steht (im Dorf) außerdem noch "Anlieger frei" dran. Damit ist das ein highway=unclassified, als planmäßige Zufahrt zu den Liebberg'schen Höfen. Mit anderen Worten: Vorher war es richtiger :)
XTMueller (2022-03-20 21:29:28+00:00): Hi FraukeLeo, vielen Dank für Deinen Kommentar. Du hast natürlich recht, es ist nicht ganz richtig. Genau genommen werden jedoch beide Wege gleichwertig benutzt, wobei der "Anlieger frei" Weg sogar eher den Spaziergängern vorbehalten bleibt, weil der andere kürzer ist. Weiterhin wurde ein neues Schild zu den Liebberg'schen Höfen aufgestellt, das auf den eigentlich gesperrten Weg leitet. Wenn Du nichts dagegen hast, würde ich es erstmal so belassen. Was meinst Du?
FraukeLeo (2022-03-21 06:36:18+00:00): Du scheinst die Stelle besser zu kennen, ich bin da nur alle paar Monate mal für einen Spaziergang. Von mir aus könnten auch alle Wege hier highway=track sein (sind ja wirklich nur schmale Wirtschaftswege, keine Straßen), eine davon mit access=destination für "Anlieger frei".
praeteritum (2022-07-10 23:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123449582.
kmpoppe (2022-10-09 10:14:32+00:00): Hi!

You added a strange mapillary value to Node 9528124545 that to me doesn't look like it would be working with any of the URLs of mapillary.

Would you please check that? Maybe a copy&paste oversight?

Thanks.

Kai
philippec (2022-10-09 15:08:38+00:00): Done.
Errare humanum est.
That is why I insist on mapillary for AEDs.
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 00:41:14+00:00): Hi,

Good thing on you checking inaccurate data, but could you please draw a new residential landuse, then? An inaccurate one is better than none.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117741634
S02R (2022-02-23 11:03:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback. Poundbury is quite unusual in having industrial, commercial and residential properties dispersed throughout. There are commercial buildings with residential flats above them, and industrial buildings sitting alongside houses and schools. To call the entire thing ‘residential’ doesn’t really make sense - I’m unclear why a large diverse area needs to be defined as a homogeneous sector. It seems like a SimCity-esque oversimplification. Nevertheless, I take your point, and once I’ve completely mapped out the buildings in Poundbury & Dorchester, I’ll then go back and try to define broad areas as best I can.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117741634
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 18:03:10+00:00): Thank you.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:57:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123449482.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123449268.
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 00:17:06+00:00): Hi,

Muss der Name vom Energie- und Gewerbepark wirklich so lang sein? Üblicherweise drückt man ehemalige Nutzungen anders in Tags aus.

Mfg,
Emil
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117742650
stoni100 (2022-02-23 06:57:25+00:00): Hi,

der Name ist nach der Quelle (https://www.niederkruechten.de/de/inhalt/ehemaliger-britischer-militaerflughafen-javellin-barracks/) tatsächlich (im Augenblck) noch so lang.

Möglicherweise ändert sich das ja bereits mit dem Namen des entstehenden BPlans .... ich bin da eh noch nicht fertig ....

Grüße

Michael
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 09:13:37+00:00): Ok, vielen Dank für die Info.
user_11332999 (2022-02-23 15:17:41+00:00): Why did you removed the regions names and replaced these by the names of the cities without discussion? You also removed the Arabic wikipedia entries and replaced them by the English names. The official language of Egypt according to its constitution is only Arabic, not English. Please correct the entries to Arabic.
Ahmed500000 (2022-02-25 12:58:48+00:00): I found that some governorates have no region name "محافظة" and others have, so I tried to make them like each other. Many other countries maps have no region name except the name which distinguish each state or region, sometimes this name is identical to the main city in the region and sometimes it is not.
MarcoR (2022-02-23 14:43:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Ho controllato il tuo gruppo di modifiche e non ho trovato errori. Se vuoi, la prossima volta prova ad aggiungere qualche informazione (un edificio, un civico, il nome di una strada, etc.)

A presto,
Marco.
Øystein Bjørndal (2022-07-09 16:05:06+00:00): Hei, har blitt noe rart her, ikke nødvendigvis din feil. Bergen har nå flere duplikate barnehager, jeg har fikset noe, men kan du gå over barnehager markert med "FEIL:" på https://obtitus.github.io/barnehagefakta_osm_data/4601.html
?

f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9528201334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423945444
pbock (2022-07-16 21:08:18+00:00): Spiren og Sjøsprøyten barnehage havnet dessuten midt i Store Lungegårdsvann. Det virket usannsynlig og jeg flyttet dem, men er det en fare for at andre barnehager havnet på et mindre åpenbart feil sted?
plennert (2022-08-04 05:23:11+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, dies ist doch ein Gebäude. Fehlt da nicht nicht noch ein Tag? VG plennert
PT-53 (2022-08-04 05:45:40+00:00): Hallo plennert,
um welches "Gebäude" geht hier den?
Grüße
plennert (2022-08-04 08:09:40+00:00): Sag mal, tracks Du meine Tätigkeiten?
plennert (2022-08-04 08:09:50+00:00): HAllenbad Singen
PT-53 (2022-08-04 08:19:02+00:00): Hallo plennert,
ja ich habe nichts besseres zu tun als Dich zu überwachen. :-)

Wie wäre es mit einem Link zum Hallenbad Singen?
Dann können sich das auch andere ansehen.
Grüße
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-23 20:02:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448983.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448954.
Leo Slager (2022-02-22 23:57:15+00:00): Beste Spieke,
Het is niet de bedoeling om alle brievenbussen in NL te gaan voorzien van dit soort onzinnige informatie.
Stop daar mee aub.
Noud Speijcken (2022-02-23 11:37:40+00:00): Beste Leo,

Ik vond het zelf ook al niet erg nuttig, maar ik ben wel verbaasd dat je het vervolgens ongedaan maakt. Mag ik je vragen om mij op weg te helpen?

Hoe het mappen zelf werkt vind ik wel uit, de tools zijn niet zo moeilijk. Waar ik tegen aan loop is wat de conventies zijn en waar ik nuttige taken kan vinden om te doen.

Ik ben (opnieuw) begonnen met mappen vanwege een missend paadje en meertje in ons bos. Vervolgens lijkt het me leuk om bij te dragen, maar ons wijk is heel compleet. Twee stukjes gras toegevoegd en de winkel van POI info voorzien (vind je dat wel nuttig?).

Nu tipte mij iemand op dat MapRoulette, waar deze brievenbus op stond. Heb je daar ervaring mee? Staan er ook nuttige dingen op? Is de "How to map a" een goede conventie?

Heb je tips om nuttige projecten te vinden? Is HOT een goede manier op te beginnen?

Hopelijk kun je me verder helpen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Noud
Leo Slager (2022-02-23 12:08:13+00:00): Dag Noud,
Welkom terug als mapper.
Ik zie dat je na 11 jaar weer wilt gaan mappen.
Ik zal je allereerst ons welkomstbericht toesturen met wat handige links en tips. Probeer je vooraf in te lezen door voor een bepaald onderwerp de wiki te raadplegen.
In een PB zal ik wat verder ingaan op je vragen.

Groet
Leo
tyr_asd (2022-02-27 10:59:49+00:00): Hey. I have noticed that the mopdifications in this changeset have resulted in a small "spike"  of the boundary of Russia at the following nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7770263964, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7770298536 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/266012296. Was this intentional?

Also, the boundary of Estonia doesn't match the indicated source anymore: compare https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/0000/0002/4407/Lisa%202.pdf with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/266012308/history for example.

PS: Do you have a link to a digital copy of the source you used in this changeset?
sähkö (2022-02-27 11:28:30+00:00): The current russian maritime border is taken from
https://pkk.rosreestr.ru
To resolve the spike it is necessary to dissolve estonian border points from the russian points.
Pikse (2022-05-17 14:14:50+00:00): Sähkö, it seems https://pkk.rosreestr.ru. Do you know another source for Russian maritime border? I find one which suggests that in Narva Bay there isn't a gap between Estonian and Russian territorial waters: https://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html

Currently Estonian maritime border is grossly messed up, especially due to this:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8088199997
and also due subsequent "fix" attempt by another user:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/40162984

I think it should be restored altogether, unless an accurate source is proved on how exactly the Russian maritime border (possibly) differs from that of Estonia.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448935.
eggie (2022-02-22 22:05:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscscnd (2022-06-01 13:48:02+00:00): Cześć! Czy możesz sprawdzić <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121803661> (wizualizacja: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/9511966203)? W ramach jakichś porządków nazwisko Rusch zostało zmienione na Busch.
RicoElectrico (2024-11-11 20:53:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4462612
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448814.
mikko_tamura (2022-02-23 02:43:35+00:00): please add more specific in the type of shop. you can actually use shop=general or shop=shoes
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117744461
Mashin (2022-02-23 00:50:18+00:00): Hi,
please when editing do not delete existing features, but rather modify their shape by dragging points.
Also the shapes that you draw were of worse quality than those that were there before.
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:42:58+00:00): wow, groß, bruder.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117744847
jpennycook (2022-02-22 21:47:55+00:00): Hi!

Can you confirm the source of this name?  I've not heard Tilford referred to as Islamabad.

Jon
Jacksonville (2022-02-23 02:26:26+00:00): Hi Jon. It does seem unusual but the Ahmadiyya community refers to this place as "Islamabad (Tilford)", as their headquarters are located here.
Jacksonville (2022-02-23 02:27:45+00:00): *Who's members are primarily speakers of Urdu.
jpennycook (2022-02-23 08:56:18+00:00): Thanks for replying.  I think that most speakers of Urdu are not members of the Ahmadiyya community (an Urdu-speaking friend of mine who lives nearby is not a member, for example, and would not use that name for the village).  The Wikipedia page refers to the village as just "ٹلفورڈ" (https://ur.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%B9%D9%84%D9%81%D9%88%D8%B1%DA%88).

Jon
Jacksonville (2022-02-23 16:05:46+00:00): I'm not sure about nearby areas, but since most Urdu speakers in the village are members of the Ahmadiyya community, I felt it would have been more appropriate to name it that. The actual name, actually refers to the centre on sheephatch lane, but the entire village is *generally known as Islamabad. Happy to have it reverted, if you feel it's better to leave it as "Tilford".
Jacksonville (2022-02-23 16:07:50+00:00): Also, side note. Urdu Wikipedia is generally not reliable for names of places. Contributors try and translate names based on guessed pronunciation and transliteration, for the sake of publishing a page. It's the reason why I'm trying to localise the names in Urdu 😅
jpennycook (2022-02-24 09:39:05+00:00): Thanks.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448610.
infeeeee (2022-02-22 23:31:05+00:00): Szia! Üdv az openstreetmapen!
A bezárt üzlethelyiségeket nem törölni szoktuk, hanem a 'disused' címkét használjuk helyette: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: 
Ha kérdéseid lennének a szerkesztéssel kapcsolatban, várunk a magyar közösség különböző elérhetőségein: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/K%C3%B6z%C3%B6ss%C3%A9g
További jó térképezést!
XCFV1L (2022-02-23 15:47:59+00:00): Szia! 

Elnezest kerek, probalok utana nezni a dolgoknak a wiki-ben mikor valami nem vilagos de sajnos itt nem tettem ezt meg, ezek utan jobban odafigyelek majd!

Koszi!
felipeeugenio (2022-02-23 12:01:57+00:00): Hola Leonardo. gracias por tus aportes. Si estás interesado por favor unirte al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) el link https://t.me/OSMcl.
por lo pronto te pido por favor no usar nombres genéricos ni descriptivos en los elementos, ya que no son sus nombres reales, independiente de que la descripción esté bien.
Esta y todas las convenciones de la comunidad presentes en la wiki del proyecto se conversan a diario en el chat para ayudar a quienes comienzan a mapear.
saludos
Leonardo D (2022-02-23 12:19:50+00:00): Gracias Felipe.  Me puedes señálar si los nombres genericos o descriptivos se refieren a "Acceso Estacionamiento Subterraneo"? Para poder mejorarlo.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-23 12:26:42+00:00): Hola. Si, a eso me refería. saludos
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:55:22+00:00): This seems organized, but just checking in. Is this coordinated? Will these be replaced?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745713
Eebie (2022-02-23 21:24:25+00:00): Die gebouwen werden onmiddellijk vervangen door gebouwen met huisnummer door import van GRB.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-22 23:11:52+00:00): Hi Andy,
The buildings and footpath you added here really don't appear to match any imagery.
There's clearly some development going on here, but even then, the buildings you added don't match the individual plots that appear in Esri Imagery and the footpath you added makes no sense at all.
Are you about to provide more information on what you used to trace these features?
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448557.
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:53:35+00:00): Das gleiche... Warum?????
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745875
Eifelkobold! (2022-02-23 22:17:03+00:00): Guten Abend misterte,

ich habe dich bereits in deinem ersten Änderungssatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117132250) gefragt, warum du die Gärten gelöscht hast. Da keine Antwort erfolgte, habe ich die Änderungen zurückgesetzt. Nun hast du die Änderungen ohne weiteren Kommentar erneut durchgeführt, so dass ein weiterer User diese zurücksetzen musste. 

Bitte erläutere, warum du die Gärten löschst und unterlasse weitere Löschungen! Andernfalls muss von Vandalismus (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Vandalismus) ausgegangen und eine Sperre deines Accounts beantragt werden.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
praeteritum (2022-07-10 22:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448486.
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:53:04+00:00): Entschuldigung? Was war mit diesen Gärten falsch? Hier hat jemand Arbeit reingesteckt!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745887
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:36:29+00:00): Hi. Warum machst du das rückgängig? Waren doch schöne Gärten.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745903
neuhausr (2022-03-07 18:46:50+00:00): Hi thanks for working on this! Can you please share your source(s) for these kind of edits, even if it's just wikipedia? Aside from general best practices, sometimes there are multiple names and it helps in sorting that out. Thanks again and happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-22 23:16:51+00:00): Hi Tim,

I'm not especially familiar with the features you're adding, but at a guess based on the names and imagery, these might be better mapped as nature reserves or protected areas as opposed to parks?

Park tagging on OSM typically implies a maintained public green space.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 00:37:11+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have deleted the other houses here. Was this intentional?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746022
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:33:40+00:00): Hi. Ich sehe nicht ganz, was du hier machen wolltest. Das access=private war bereits vorhanden, was ihn eigentlich genug als privat kennzeichnet.

Du hast einfach nur das amenity=parking entfernt, was ihn hier zu einer bedeutungslosen, privaten Fläche macht.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746084