piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kate_rocketdata (2021-06-29 12:25:40+00:00): в какой именно точке? исправляли все то, что Вы писали на форуме к данному пакету.
Grass-snake (2021-06-29 12:45:32+00:00): Почти для всех, в этом пакете почти во всех неправильно.

На форуме я указал только для примера, на самом деле во многих точках неправильно указано.
В часах работы указано "Mo-Su 9:00 - 21:00". Это ошибка, правильно писать "Mo-Su 09:00-21:00" (часы указывать двумя символами, а также до и после тире не должно быть пробелов). Для некоторых интерпретаторов это важно.
Подробнее читайте на странице opening_hours.
kate_rocketdata (2021-06-29 13:36:05+00:00): учтем в следующих выгрузках обязательно и передам коллегам.
спасибо Вам
Anton Khorev (2021-06-29 10:29:30+00:00): У "Буше" на самом деле есть английское и французское название? Можете показать, где оно используется?
mueschel (2021-06-18 15:42:24+00:00): Hi,
what does "payment:distance_payment" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
rthik007 (2021-06-17 11:40:13+00:00): Hi TSU_Ericat :),
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road way 878481593.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106526342
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106479163
Vinber-Pro (2021-06-17 16:09:58+00:00): On a perdu le blokhaus :(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106479636
OTSeignanx (2021-06-17 21:34:54+00:00): Cela fait déjà quelques années que ce bunker a été démoli. Par nécessité, plus que par volonté : il accentuait l'érosion du pied de dune...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106479636
ika-chan! (2021-07-02 14:55:17+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195530852, is_in=* is deprecated in Greece because it duplicates boundary relations. If there are any missing boundary relations, let us know at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 and we will see what we can do.
zsolt d (2021-07-03 19:05:40+00:00): Hi! Thanks, I fixed it .
Florian6345_2 (2021-06-16 17:05:20+00:00): Laut OSM Wiki zu Vandalismus:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Data_working_group
Vandalismus sollten von der lokalen Community unter Benutzung der Vorschläge auf Vandalismus behandelt werden.
Die Diskussion zu Landnutzungsflächen wurde hier eingeleiteten. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72868 Es ist bislang kein Mandat oder eine plausible Begründung für ein Revert oder sogar der Sperre eines Users ersichtlich: 
POV des anonymen Users woodpeck
DD1GJ (2021-06-18 07:21:52+00:00): Revert, unzulässige Quelle.
dreua (2024-03-06 18:16:16+00:00): Name Tag ohne weitere beschreibende Tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8839418631
Ist das ein Schild?
blackboxlogic (2021-06-27 00:24:47+00:00): What's an NL script?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106481841
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-24 17:31:35+00:00): Is this import documented somewhere? Note https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
NKA (2021-07-24 17:51:56+00:00): Of course: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Norway_Building_Import
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-25 09:49:58+00:00): great, thanks!

(in general it is a good idea to link wiki documentation in bot/import edits withing changeset tags - JOSM allows doing it)
Futur3r (2021-06-16 19:14:57+00:00): Salut,

il ne faut pas utiliser de area=yes sur des polygones de landuse.

Aussi tes polygones de foret n'englobe pas l'ensemble de la foret.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106482125
My Sweet pack (2021-07-13 03:19:19+00:00): No existe esa farmacia ahí, ahora es una ferretería "Del Tero"
TheShiningAlbatross (2021-06-16 18:00:03+00:00): Offset used: 3.67; 5.78
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106482759
abakus_uploader (2021-06-16 22:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
syntex (2021-06-18 08:19:18+00:00): Już jest w budowie?
cyberatlas (2021-06-18 08:39:59+00:00): jest wydany ZRID na tą drogę
syntex (2021-06-18 09:26:39+00:00): To nie oznacza, że jest ona w budowie
maraf24 (2021-06-18 11:27:38+00:00): Wydanie ZRID można dopisać w description (lub note).
syntex (2021-06-22 07:59:56+00:00): W porządku, prace rozpoczęły się wczoraj, gdyż zakwalifkowano ten odcinek jako zwykły remont, do którego nie trzeba przetargu.
canfe (2021-06-17 04:20:12+00:00): Non credo che questa corsia a fianco del Mc Donald sia a due corsie e nemmeno che abbia il marciapiede da ambo i lati.
SafetyIng (2026-04-08 09:29:34+00:00): Hey, you used "residential=cottage" - could you join our conversation on community.osm.org?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/residential-tag-for-settlements-with-weekend-holiday-homes/142867
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 19:55:49+00:00): In den Räumen ist jetzt der Wimmer drin?
Danysan95 (2021-07-06 20:22:01+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che la prassi standard quando si creano dei percorsi composti da molti pezzi di tipi diversi (incluse le ciclovie) è inserire nel campo "name" delle singole linee solo l'eventuale nome di quel pezzo di strada, mentre il nome del percorso (come "Ciclovia del Santerno") va inserito nel campo "name" della relazione che contiene tutte le linee.
Questo per evitare situazioni come quella che hai inserito in cui una strada finisce per avere due nomi (Via Canale continua a chiamarsi Via Canale anche se fa parte della ciclovia!).
Trovi più informazioni nella documentazione (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations, "It is preferred to tag the cycle routes using relations instead of tagging the ways." ; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici , "tutte le informazioni riportate nella tabella sotto devono essere nella relazione e non nei campi dei vari segmenti che la compongono").
In questo caso il nome della ciclovia è già nella relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12672070 , quindi il nome non servirebbe nei singoli pezzi di ciclabile.
Quelli comunque non sono un problema. I nomi delle strade, piuttosto, lo sono. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107518980 quindi ho ripristinato i nomi delle strade.
angys (2021-06-17 20:55:47+00:00): Thank you for update Mukah airport, btw do you interest to join unofficial Malaysia OSM telegram community group?
CoolCityCat (2021-06-18 11:24:36+00:00): Thanks for the invite. I have just joined the Telegram group.
eggie (2021-06-16 18:51:25+00:00): Dag Jaap,

Waar zou de eigenaar recht op hebben. Dit is een kaart van OSM...  Eigenaar van een landgoed kan zich geen rechten ontlenen wat ergens op welke kaart dan ook staat.
Wanneer voor aan de weg aangegeven staat art. 461 WvS dan taggen we op het wegdeel access=private
Op een paaltje hoort geen access=no Dat is default.

Editor iD is best een lastige editor en heeft de neiging alles aan elkaar te plakken. De weg zit nu vastgeplakt aan de landuse=forest
Ik zal dat even losmaken.
Ook het draaihek zit vast aan de landuse..Op het draaihek kunnen ook accesstags als access=private
Zijn er geen uitzonderingen op het verbod zoals wandelaars?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106484028

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-16 18:52:50+00:00): Zo te zien heb je het hek verplaatst naar halverweged de weg?
Is dat de bedoeling?
eggie (2021-06-16 18:58:58+00:00): Hek heb ik teruggeplaatst naar  waar het vandaan kwam en access=no (bijna altijd fout)  aangepast naar private.
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2021-06-17 10:43:59+00:00): Hi,

Lord knows what 'road detailing' means other than me wasting time to find out what it was, seemingly adding nodes in ways. Please be more 'detailed' in what you actually did. Helps reviewers very much.

TIA
Duvodas (2021-10-18 11:15:50+00:00): Hallo, hast du Ortskenntnisse in Wipperfürth? Ist die Lüdenscheider Straße zwischen Marktplatz und Surgeres Platz nun tatsächlich eine Einbahnstraße? Ist der Radverkehr in Gegenrichtung freigegeben? Ich pflege eine Radroute, die durch diese Straße verläuft.
Viele Grüße
ppuschmann (2021-10-20 14:31:26+00:00): Bitte entschuldige die späte Rückmeldung.
Ja, das ist wirklich nun eine Einbahnstraße.

Hintergrund ist unter anderem, dass die Kreuzung Gartenstraße/Lüdenscheider Straße demnächst wohl auch durch einen Kreisverkehr ersetzt werden soll.
pio2_122 (2021-06-16 19:03:39+00:00): Please do not use the tag "name:de" for historical names. Most of them are not related to the current (Polish) names of these objects. Those names should be added to the "old_name:de" tag. Please correct this (or if you want, I can do it for you).
More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
user_1566574 (2021-07-01 12:19:20+00:00): Salut !
Alors apparemment cette place ajoutée en alt_name se trouve juste en dessous.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2016537

Qu'en penses-tu ?
Merci :)
Shohreh (2021-07-01 13:44:54+00:00): Bonjour

Je ne peux pas dire parce que n'y passerai que dans quelques jours. 

J'ai rajouté le nom parce que cette place existe apparemment sous deux noms différents et que je ne l'ai pas trouvé tout de suite avec l'unique d'origine.
philippec (2021-06-29 14:50:15+00:00): # Vespucci
Tielt VTI, er zaten drie AEDs opeen.  Ik heb er 3 gewist.
Ik kan ook niet werken met Vespucci.
De AED staat ook nog binnen de muren, wat mogelijk is voor een outdoor toestel.  Ik wacht nog op een foto.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2021-06-23 09:32:18+00:00): Hello, it seems that you've changed tagging of a combined pedestrian/bicycle path (kergliiklustee) from footway to cycleway. Aerial imagery from Maaamet shows a combined bicycle-pedestrian crossing.

Cycleway by default is a road where pedestrian traffic is NOT allowed, like on Pirita tee. The correct ways to tag pedestrian/bicycle path are:
1)
highway=footway
bicycle=designated
2)
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
3)
highway=cycleway
foot=designated
OSMWeekly (2021-06-22 05:05:42+00:00): I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean.  I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out.  To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work.  Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards.  OSM is a collaborative project, not an island.
pyrog (2021-09-02 07:45:17+00:00): Salut Barnes,

J'ai corrigé Gboost en contactant directement la société.
C'est une société franco-allemande qui fabrique des kit d'assistance électrique pour vélos.

Il n'y a ni vente de vélo, ni réparations, ni possibilité de recharger sa batterie.

Bonne route,

__
Yves

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8839816625
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106485814
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 20:06:55+00:00): Die Häuser sind teilweise nicht lückenlos verbunden.
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 20:24:29+00:00): Frage ist auch, ob man den gesamten Komplex tatsächlich neu zeichnen muss, die Nr. 19 hätte man anfügen können und die Nr. 13 in der Form anpassen.
geo-d (2021-06-16 21:50:00+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe die Lücken erst bei stärkerer Vergrößerung gesehen und jetzt auch geschlossen. Da die Reihenhäuser alle etwas zu schmal waren und die richtigen Hausgrenzen bei überlagernder Skizze schwer abzugrenzen waren, habe ich mich entschlossen alles neu zu machen.
geo-d (2021-06-16 22:15:11+00:00): Korrektur: die Reihenhäuser waren natürlich zu breit dargestellt
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 22:33:03+00:00): Einwandfrei, Vorgehensweise hängt natürlich auch immer vom Editor ab. Lücken sind jetzt perfekt
mueschel (2021-06-18 16:07:08+00:00): Could you check these nodes? Two of them got a strange 'environnementale' tag.
joost schouppe (2021-08-15 12:32:57+00:00): Playground was inderdaad nogal raar voor dit gebouw, maar highway=raceway klopt toch ook niet, tenzij voor het circuit zelf natuurlijk. sport=karting zonder bijhorende tag is ook vreemd, dus heb ik er maar leisure=sports_centre van gemaakt.
praeteritum (2023-07-03 04:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138046641.
praeteritum (2023-06-29 05:42:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137902875.
comfyquiettree (2021-06-16 19:26:41+00:00): Na internetu jsem našel výhradně název "U Liry".
tux67 (2021-06-17 06:09:55+00:00): Hi, weißt du welche Beschilderung am Radweg an der Lövenicher Straße steht? Vielerorts sind die Städte dazu übergegangen die kombinierten Rad/Fußweg Schilder abzumontieren und nur ein Radfahrer frei Schild aufzuhängen.
Ich nehme mal an, das ist ein kombinierter Rad-Fußweg? (das habe ich schon mal angepasst)
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106487514
Warin61 (2021-06-17 00:43:59+00:00): Where a footway crosses a road there should be a 'crossing' e.g. crossing=unmarked.

However .. much easier to simply add footways to the roads see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway
LiztenUp (2021-06-16 20:35:30+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
eggie (2021-08-06 12:21:44+00:00): Maar omdat iets gevaarlijk zou zijn hoef je dat toch niet te verwijderen. Het is toch gewoon de brommerdoorsteek omdat het vervolg een G11 fietspad is?
Nu gaat er iets fout in de routering
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-06 12:32:34+00:00): De doorsteek heb ik hersteld...

Echt consensus is er niet, maar een bromfietsdoorsteek verwijderen is het andere uiterste.
Ik heb de doorsteek hersteld.
Lees anders even dit draadje https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=21482
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-06 12:33:18+00:00): Het zal niet routeren voor fietsers overigens.. De hoofdrijbaan staat op slot met bicycle=use_sidepath
marczoutendijk (2021-12-17 16:37:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82582806
natural=Centre Nautique
La valeur de natural=* ne peut pas être le nom d'un bâtiment ou d'un service. Qu'est-ce que tu voulais dire ?
djo_man (2021-12-18 10:37:50+00:00): Bonjour, Je vois ce qu'il c'est passé. il y avait déjà un name et je devais sans doute vouloir modifier le nom. Par habitude j'ai écrit "na" en comptant que JOSM fasse la complétion. il l'a faite mais vers "natural". normal. Donc cela devrait être name=centre nautique, le vrai nom municipal de ce club de voile. voila. je modifie.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-18 13:38:36+00:00): Merci!
danbjoseph (2021-11-02 00:54:02+00:00): All available satellite imagery shows this area as agricultural fields, no buildings. Please find someone to help train you on image interpretation and work to improve your feature identification.
fayor (2021-06-16 21:32:46+00:00): Ciao, forse per sbaglio hai cancellato il nodo della stazione di Pozzillo. Anche il layer delle tettoie era sbagliato (-1 invece di 1), ho provveduto a correggere.
schwukas (2021-06-17 15:34:01+00:00): As mentioned on your other changesets: Buildings are usually square and should be mapped that way, unless they definitely are not square. These are, though, so please correct the ones you've created. Also, I can see there are quite some houses missing. I for one, don't think it's sensible to map just a bunch of houses and then don't do the rest. If you're not willing to map everything in that area, please leave a note.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106488496
Dimacn (2021-06-17 04:10:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста скажите откуда взяты названия парков отдыха?
SomeoneElse (2021-06-16 20:17:44+00:00): Hello,
As mentioned previously on https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/106425749  it'd be great to know what is actually happening here. Changeset comments should explain a little bit about what you're mapping; you're here doesn't say anything at all.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy
schwukas (2021-06-17 06:48:25+00:00): Hey, thanks for your contribution. In the future, please keep changesets to one smaller area (for instance to one country, one city, one state etc.). In your case, the bounding box spans across half the world which makes in incredibly hard to see exactly what changes you've made.
Apart from that, the buildings you have added are not square. Please consult the OSM wiki on how to map (and square up) buildings. iD has a dedicated feature for just that. I'd like to ask you to go back and fix those buildings, then upload the repairs in two new changesets, one for Japan, one for Germany.
SekeRob (2021-06-17 11:15:47+00:00): There's a lot of this going on... mappers in Germany who then map something in South East Asia in the same set. Someone is leading by bad example I wildly guess.
This edit though is with ID editor 2.19.6 though, not like StreetComplete that somehow does not close edit sets though uploaded and concatenates if the next reported edits if they are of the same type. I'm observing this when surveying on bike and really dislike this behavior of the software. Saving with ID editor is truly committing and closing i.e. a building in Germany can be saved and a building in Japan can be saved and only local mappers will see the respective edits in their mapping history views.
SekeRob (2021-06-17 11:28:07+00:00): BTW A first time editor actually wrote in her/his comment it belonged to a school assignment... We had a group of 25-30 a few months ago creating havoc in town with lots of road node dragging. The error reports exploded. Trying to communicate... absolutely zero comment back. As diagnostics runs slow just this week a 2 month old edit of theirs popped up... a residential area mapped across several others and only caught attention as it popped up in my Osmose/Neis report because I happened to touch a node of the main one. It took time to fix.
danbjoseph (2021-11-30 14:14:06+00:00): You have traced a lot of agricultural fields as buildings.
Unbeatable101 (2021-06-16 21:18:03+00:00): So then use the allowed access tag, – as I did in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106490690 – don't name it.
slowtux (2021-06-16 22:07:21+00:00): Moin,
gehe davon aus, das Du verschiedene Accounts verwendest.

siehe bitte im Forum

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72406

mfg
Gregor
EwoutH (2021-06-17 08:44:12+00:00): Image for context: https://i.imgur.com/vxyiqkp.jpg
i2004 (2021-06-17 16:23:18+00:00): algunas veces si hace
AgusQui (2021-06-17 17:01:29+00:00): Los desvíos ocasionales que puedan tener los servicios no se mapea. Si el desvío es prolongado, por alguna obra importante por ejemplo, se puede dibujar el desvío agregando un fixme aclaratorio
gscholz (2021-06-19 08:52:22+00:00): Hi 769533915,
this changeset has destroyed a lot of boundary relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-70.49008&lat=-3.63232&zoom=9

I have fixed those meanwhile, but I strongly recommend to use JOSM instead of ID as an editor dealing with relations, as JOSM one shows error messages if something goes wrong like here. I also recommend to read the documentation about boundary relations in the wiki before you edit anything like this again:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-06-19 08:53:16+00:00): Sorry wrong name due to copy error, the right one is "NFZANMNIM".
Guido
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 22:51:49+00:00): Die Gebäude haben jetzt die Hausnummern jeweils auf dem Umriss und auf dem Knoten, das ergibt Duplikate.
Prussio (2021-06-16 23:07:30+00:00): Wo sollen die Hausnummern denn besser hin? Direkt ins "Gebäudeobjekt" oder als zusätzlichen Adressknoten? VG
user_2066394 (2021-06-16 23:18:08+00:00): Beides ist an sich korrekt, nur nicht gleichzeitig. :-) Ggf. an der näheren Umgebung orientieren.
mueschel (2021-06-17 09:34:22+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here.
All the nodes have a larger number of foreign tags that shouldn't appear in OSM, e.g. Castañal=El Paquio
Circunfere=484.0
Comunario=Francisca Salazar
Drenaje=Inundable
Relieve=Inclinado
Sotobosque=Bajio

I also wonder about the number of trees which are connected to highways.
JJIglesias (2021-06-19 17:36:58+00:00): Saludos Rodolfo, este Changeset y el siguiente 106490431 son obviamente una importacion de datos que has hecho y que incluyen una cantidad de Tags que NO EXISTEN en la base de datos de OSM. Toda importacion de datos debe ser Concensuada con la comunidad local y este NO es el caso, no para prohibir la importacion como tal sino para garantizar q errores como estos NO sucedan desde un Principio. Por favor te agradezco tu respuesta, antes de solicitar al DWG que Revierta estos dos Changesets incorrectos. Gracias
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-20 03:33:50+00:00): I send a following email to DWG:

title: undiscussed import (adding 10 000+ trees, no sign of discussing import)

body: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106490346
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106490346
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-20 03:35:46+00:00): @rodolfovargas

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

All imports must be discussed before making any edits. Have you did it here?
Supaplex (2021-06-21 05:57:45+00:00): Delete of the untouched trees on behave of Data Working Group. Before the import, please send a message to the import mailing list and discuss with the local community. And don't forget to use the tag the OpenStreetMap community use, no alien tag.
Supaplex (2021-06-21 06:00:56+00:00): Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106692530
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-21 06:07:53+00:00): I reverted also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106490431
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-21 06:08:02+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106490346
ChelSeaTheWorld (2021-06-16 21:38:48+00:00): I meant to put Esri World Imagery (Clarity) as my source, but the offset is correct
Myazyk (2021-07-10 10:58:59+00:00): Доргою від Дуброви до Роздолу проїхати неможливо.
Думаю, що її варто позначити як грунтовку
olehz (2021-07-10 11:25:11+00:00): А трек по твому звідки взявся? Я там особисто катав роки 2 тому - нормальна там дорога як для України
olehz (2021-07-10 11:28:50+00:00): Та й якість покриття іншим треком позначається. Дорога Сопіт-Довге куди в гіршому стані, як і тисячі інших доріг між селами
Myazyk (2021-07-11 20:29:29+00:00): Поняття не маю звідки трек і так само поняття не маю чи є там трек, бо поняття не маю де дивитись на ті треки (вже знайшов, але ніколи не дивився) - це перше.
А друге, близько місяця тому їхали ми тією дорогою з Дуброви, то повернулись назад, бо проїхати було неможливо - там болото було - дорога для всюдиходів
olehz (2021-07-12 00:15:34+00:00): Ну це від кліренсу залежить і від суб'єктивних вподобань власника авто. Я як хапнув авто лише по такому лайну і катаю. Та дорога, це точно не для лісовозів чи тракторів, там катають. Кому авто не шкода, пройде. Тому закликаю юзаїти правильні теги, а не понижувати клас дороги. Східниця-Турка, в приклад
olehz (2021-07-12 00:25:34+00:00): А публічні GPS треки, ти можеж і на цьому сайті врубити - є галочка в шарах. Я на відміну від різних VARварів вже більше 1К треків бензи напали. Лише публічних. Тому мене і харять "закгруглення". Лол ((