piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2022-10-05 23:39:39+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding information on the map but I am afraid you’re doing it wrong.

When filling the street, you must only write something like "Willem de Croylaan", and NOT "Willem de Croylaan, 15".  The housenumber is written in a separate field (addr:housenumber in the database), which is a separate query in StreetComplete.
invalidusername-4 (2022-10-07 21:11:02+00:00): Ok 👍
OpenBrian (2022-10-07 13:33:55+00:00): appreciated, thanks
user_2066394 (2022-10-05 22:43:24+00:00): Auch hier die Frage, existiert die Reisebank als Bank/Filiale noch bzw. ist hier wirklich eine reine Wechselstube?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbureau_de_change
Nic Gommans (2022-10-05 20:46:16+00:00): Incorrect description. It should have been: Demolished house has been removed from the map and new construction is added.
user_2066394 (2022-10-05 22:39:32+00:00): Die Reisebank ist mit disused:amenity=* eingetragen, existiert hier also nicht mehr.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
user_2066394 (2022-10-05 21:39:24+00:00): Die Reisebank als Bank/Filiale existiert dort noch?
abakus_uploader (2022-10-05 22:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:13:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
See my comments on your mappings on other changesets which also applies here
Please improve your mapping skills .



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127067160
ma-rt-in (2022-10-06 14:43:07+00:00): Hallo,
was genau soll lanes=0 bedeuten?
Meinst du das im Bezug auf deinen Hinweis (#3386964).
Was genau ist gesperrt und vorallem wie lange?

vg
krad3 (2022-10-09 20:29:52+00:00): Hallo.
Die Straße Am Schäferstieg 
Ist wegen Bauarbeiten gesperrt.
Wie lange das dauert kann keiner sagen.
Ich mache wieder eine Notiz wenn sie geöffnet ist.
VG
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 21:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127172639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6427 and previous blocks.  Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 21:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127172639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6427 and previous blocks.  Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
osmviborg (2022-10-05 21:15:47+00:00): Inden du tegner en separat cykelsti, som den om rundkørslen på Søgade, så check om stien i forvejen er tagget på landevejen, det er den her 'cycleway:right=lane'.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:01:52+00:00): Hello,
There seems to be an argument over the mapping of https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892 .  Can you please explain why you think you are correct?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:02:13+00:00): Hola,
Parece haber una discusión sobre el mapeo de https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1909536892. ¿Puedes explicar por qué crees que estás en lo correcto?
Saludos,
Andy Townsend, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:02:58+00:00): Please use better changeset comments than "Corrección de errores ".
SomeoneElse (2022-10-05 21:03:02+00:00): Utilice mejores comentarios de conjunto de cambios que "Corrección de errores".
Polarbear (2022-10-29 20:14:02+00:00): Vor deinem Changeset waren drei Gebäude in Ordnung. 
Hinterher waren zwei Teile verschmolzen, und einer zu einem Strich mutiert. 
Die Adresse 36 gab es auch schon. 

Repariert. cs 128225643
tordans (2022-12-31 11:23:57+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account, FYI you added a tiny segment in this changeset that has oneway=yes which now connects the other side of road and prevents routing from south to north. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101331104

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130716610
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-31 15:41:44+00:00): Thx.
RicoElectrico (2022-10-05 21:46:26+00:00): Dzięki! Już chciałem do Ciebie pisać, że brakuje OSP :)
Filip009 (2022-10-05 21:14:50+00:00): *Bedzany
RSydes (2024-09-04 04:19:04+00:00): Where was it said that "Walnut Point Wildlife Management Area" was separate from Walnut Point State Park?  It is not on this map (https://pscc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=fb8dbaacc7b04c7fa12e850b9e7141ab).  Indeed, there aren't any useful search results.
chlenix (2025-05-28 18:00:45+00:00): I left the borders as they were.
I only added trees
RSydes (2025-06-05 02:53:24+00:00): The version history of Walnut Point Wildlife Management Area (14660704) says you created version #1, so I assumed you drew the borders.
chlenix (2025-06-06 10:50:23+00:00): I created a new multipolygon, but based on the old geometry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
ivanbranco (2022-10-07 15:54:35+00:00): Ciao Vultus79,

ma questi nomi "il daino", "il folletto" sono nomi veri o i nomi utilizzati dai biker? Nel secondo caso si deve utilizzare mtb:name=* invece di name=*

Benvenuto su OSM e buon mapping :)
evod (2022-10-07 12:15:55+00:00): Sehr cool, dass du die Wien Mobil Stationen einträgst, danke! Ich hab vor gefühlten Ewigkeiten ja die Citybike Stationen gepflegt, bin aber noch nicht dazu gekommen mir die neuen Wien Mobil Räder anzuschauen :)
mapperich (2022-10-07 19:33:23+00:00): Ja klar. :) In den letzten Monaten sind sehr viele wieder aktiviert worden. Leider komm' ich immer nur in diesselben Bezirke und selten in die Flächenbezirke.
Luzandro (2022-10-12 17:33:21+00:00): Hi,
darf ich fragen, wo du die ref für die WienMobil-Stationen her hast?
mapperich (2022-10-12 18:03:22+00:00): Klar, die hab ich aus der nextbike App bzw deren Website https://www.nextbike.at/en/wien/#suggestastation
Luzandro (2022-10-13 04:21:25+00:00): Aah, die fette Nummer in der App hatte ich schon wieder vergessen und direkt am Steher geschaut 🤦
Auf https://www.wienerlinien.at/wienmobil/stationen wird es auch nicht angezeigt. Danke für den Hinweis, dann werde ich das auch ergänzen
evod (2022-10-13 06:25:15+00:00): Die Nextbike Daten gibt's auch per offizieller offener Schnittstelle (GBFS) - die Stationenliste z.B. hier: https://gbfs.nextbike.net/maps/gbfs/v2/nextbike_wr/de/station_information.json
evod (2022-10-13 06:27:25+00:00): Dann hab ich mich gestern noch gespielt und das ganze nach geojson konvertiert.

JMESPath CLI tool jp (https://github.com/jmespath/jp) (`sudo apt install jp`) 

Create a file named `expr.txt`

    {type: 'FeatureCollection', features: data.stations[*].{type: 'Feature', geometry: {type: 'Point', coordinates: [lon, lat]}, properties: @}}

Then convert with:

    jp --filename station_information.json --expr-file expr.txt > station_information.geojson
Luzandro (2022-10-13 07:44:26+00:00): intern gibt es offenbar noch eine andere station_id aber ref sollte wohl trotzdem dieser short_name bleiben

das geojson (ohne der virtuellen Stationen) bietet sich als MapRoulette-Challenge an
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-06 09:17:21+00:00): Parków nie dodajemy w ten sposób.
SomeoneElse2 (2023-11-26 13:13:59+00:00): It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101338499 is an invalid duplicate of what is now a cycleway.
moosfrosch (2023-05-10 18:16:41+00:00): Hallo.
hast Du diesen Fußweg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48660188#map=17/51.83755/7.84416
als access=agricultural" eingezeichnet?
Das ist doch völliger Unsinn. Das ist ein öffentlicher Fuß- und Radweg, und was soll ein Landwirtschaftlicher Fußgängerverkehr sein?
Bitte um Erklärung; ich ändere das sonst.
michawtal (2023-05-10 18:29:35+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch,
ich habe den access nicht auf agricultural beschränkt (falls doch: versehentlich). In meiner Erinnerung ist das ein öffentlicher Rad/Fußweg.
Ändere es gerne!
moosfrosch (2023-05-10 19:32:03+00:00): Ja, war auf agricultural für alle. Wohl ein Versehen; kein Problem, geändert.
JJIglesias (2022-10-06 01:36:27+00:00): Saludos y favor leer:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:highway
A proposito de las vias Secundarias 

Gracias
JJ
wolfbert (2025-04-05 13:58:45+00:00): Hallo, haben wir bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88790497 tatsächlich eine Wohnstraße mit maxspeed=50?
Luzandro (2025-04-06 08:56:25+00:00): nicht aus diesem CS, aber die access-Werte für den way, die gleichzeitg mit der Wohnstraße vor 14 Jahren gesetzt wurden, sind auch komisch
copros (2025-05-07 21:14:02+00:00): Hallo Wolfbert, entschuldige die späte Antwort. Ich habe die Benachrichtigungsmails über deinen Kommentar gelöscht und bin erst jetzt draufgekommen, wie man diese Diskussion findet.
Zur Wohnstraße: Es ist schon einige Zeit her, aber ich vermute, dass ich damals von meinem Navi durch diese "Wohnstraße" geführt worden wäre. In solchen Fällen mache ich mir eine Audionotiz und schaue mir das dann zu Hause an. Wenn maxspeed-Werte wie in diesem Fall in einem Ortsgebiet fehlen, trage ich als Limit 50 km/h ein, in diesem Fall auch für diese Wohnstraße, obwohl ich dort gar nicht gefahren bin und deshalb nicht weiß, ob dort, wie von dir vermutet, tatsächlich eine niedrigere Höchstgeschwindigkeit verordnet ist. Ich finde den möglicherweise falschen 50er-Eintrag immer noch besser als den Wert leer zu lassen, weil die üblichen Navis dann dort als Höchstgeschwindigkeit 100 km/h annehmen und immer durch die "Wohnstraße" routen würden.
copros (2025-05-07 21:32:58+00:00): Nachsatz: Wenn ich mir das auf Google Maps anschaue, bezweifle ich übrigens, dass das eine Wohnstraße im üblichen Sinn ist, aber das ist jetzt reine Spekulation.
wolfbert (2025-05-08 07:03:07+00:00): Ganz so schlimm solte es nicht sein, Navis treffen auch Annahmen auf Basis des highway-Typs. Also 100er sollte es bei residential etc. nicht geben. Auch gibt es in OSM die Sicht "besser keine Daten als falsche", jedenfalls ist in so einem Fall eine note empfehlenswert.

Aber egal, das kann man nur vor Ort klären, ich habe bei OE3AFA, dem ursprünglichen Ersteller nachgefragt, vielleicht kann uns der aufklären.
Luzandro (2025-05-08 07:17:32+00:00): Ich hatte diesen auch schon zu Beginn dieser Diskussion auf diese hingewiesen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6602731
Falkons (2024-01-11 20:02:55+00:00): Hi Tom,
I feel the change in tags from cape to locality might be in err based on definitions provided by OSMWiki. I have linked below two locations of discussion.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/possible-error-in-the-mass-retagging-of-natural-cape-to-place-locality-in-hawaii/107959
https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1704946819050559
ZeLonewolf (2024-01-14 03:44:23+00:00): I agree, and based on this discussion, I am restoring natural=cape tagging.
m@rio (2022-11-12 00:02:25+00:00): Cześć 02b5357d,
przeglądając lokalizacje fotoradarów zauważyłem Twoją zmianę w tym miejscu - usunięcie relacji enforcement i dodanie dwóch fotoradarów. Nie spotkałem się z takim rozwiązaniem - jest to gdzieś udokumentowane?
NorthCrab (2022-11-12 00:33:10+00:00): Witaj,

Jako pierwszy sposób tagowania na #Tagging:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera

Uważam że taki sposób oznaczania jest bardziej przejrzysty oraz kompatybilny dla osoby edytującej OSM (jedynie chyba JOSM widocznie identyfikuje tego typu oznaczenie).

Dodatkowo, nie lubię subiektywnego określenia dystansu na tego typu relacji, uważam że jeden punkt jest w pełni obiektywny i spełnia swoje zadanie.

Zysk z posiadania relacji nie jest na tyle duży abym uznał to za preferowane rozwiązanie.

Opis changesetu był mylący.
NorthCrab (2022-11-12 00:45:54+00:00): A kamery są 2 ponieważ skopiowałem zastosowanie z rejonu tego skrzyżowania: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2489958462

Jak teraz patrzę to rzeczywiście może powinna być i 1 kamera. Tylko teraz pojawia się problem z weryfikacją w przyszłości.

Ehh…
m@rio (2022-11-12 19:52:37+00:00): No, rozumiem Twoje wątpliwości, ale https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relation:enforcement jest niezbędna dla poprawnego działania tagu speed_camera. I jest to oficjalnie stosowany sposób. 

Co do dystansu (znaczniki from i to), to ustala się go zgodnie z położeniem znaków 'Automatyczna kontrola prędkości D-51', który akurat w polskich warunkach jest obligatoryjny.

Co do 'zysku', to efekt braku relacji enforcement jest taki, że nawigacja tego nie 'widzi'.
Generalnie powinno być tak, że jedna kamera = jeden tag = jedna relacja.

Spróbuję skorygować to miejsce. Jakbyś miał jakieś wątpliwości, to daj proszę znać.
NorthCrab (2022-11-12 19:59:13+00:00): Dzięki ! Wszystko ok, poza punktem "że nawigacja tego nie 'widzi'" :P Bo jak speed cam jest przyłączony do drogi to nawigacja to rozczyta. No chyba może też zależy od samej aplikacji. OsmAnd nie ma z tym większego problemu.
m@rio (2022-11-12 20:23:36+00:00): Ok :)
claudiopereira (2022-10-28 01:01:51+00:00): Boas.
Agradeço imenso o teu trabalho no Barreiro (e noutros sítios); tanto que já tentei falar contigo noutros meios a dar-te os parabéns; Peço-te no entanto que tenhas cuidado com o que apagas ao nível da infraestrutura.

Existem soluções de software a correr em cima do OSM que acusaram desaparecimento de paragens de autocarro. Após investigar um pouco concluí que apagaste uma delas.

Não leves a mal, é algo muito menor que me fez gastar 10 minutos a tentar entender o que tinha acontecido; mas talvez seja melhor irmos coordenando as edições :)
topolusitania (2022-10-28 08:34:56+00:00): È por casos como este, que:
1 - Nunca se deve apagar nada, a não ser que tenhamos a certeza absoluta que o que apagamos é um erro crasso. O ideal é modificar o elemento.
2 - Os comentários ás nossas edições devem ser mais informativos, especialmente quando apagamos algo.
Cumprimentos
TL
aselvadeasfalto (2022-10-29 12:30:17+00:00): Caros colegas,
Obrigado pelo aviso. Já terão percebido que eu me concentro no desenho de edificado, pelo que só mexo nas highway=* quando é necessário actualizar a precisão dos seus traçados. Se apaguei essa paragem de autocarro, foi verdadeiramente por lapso.
De resto, estas chamadas de atenção são sempre bem-vindas; ainda tenho muita coisa para aprender aqui e claro que nunca as levaria a mal.

Abraço,
Selva
Violaine_Do (2022-12-23 02:46:21+00:00): it already existed and created a duplicates
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127072502
MKnight (2023-11-01 16:48:08+00:00): Moin, Du hast am Anfang der Kraftfahrstrasse maxspeed 100 durch 50 ersetzt? warum, dort steht kein Schild.
Meiner Einschätzung nach dürfte selbst 100 falsch sein, da kein Limit (bis zum 100-Schild weiter oben) besteht.
unni-geo (2024-05-07 10:59:15+00:00): Moin moin,
du meinst vermutlich dieses Wegstück:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/257814538.

Ich hatte bei dieser Änderung auch diese Zeichen eingetragen:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10078649499
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10078649484

siehe Bild:
https://t.ly/pxaC-

und daher die maxspeed=50 und das maxspeed:type=DE:urban drangeschrieben...

Passt das so?

Schöne Grüsse
MKnight (2024-05-07 12:22:18+00:00): Ok, hatte einen Denkfehler und nicht aufm Schirm, dass Kraftfahrstrasse innerorts auch nur 50km/h hat.

Insofern passt das alles, wenn ich nix überseh.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-13 10:40:57+00:00): Are you sure about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711818845 ?

Is it mapped based on aerial (which one?) or is it some kind of a mistake?
danieldegroot2 (2022-11-13 12:00:23+00:00): @Mateusz Looks to be accidentally tagged while mapping
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101352021

V1 was created by Heinz_V, who split the administrative boundaries in what are supposedly the Tehsils, without further specifying any relations on, or deleting, the newly created ways
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehsil )
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73124217

Could you remove it and contact Heinz_V, please?
(Sidenote: iD will give a blocking warning when trying to save an empty way.)
Iirc India has opened up some of its data so it's likely the data can be filled in / replaced properly.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-13 12:18:17+00:00): It seems that it used to be part of relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9895020/history - is may be OK to remove it now.

I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73124217
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-13 12:19:30+00:00): I retagged it to fixme carrier, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711818845
fititnt (2022-11-14 08:19:36+00:00): In my defense, I will argue sort of self-incompetence. I was casually mapping around the region it  left me after the tutorial. So I think I touch 2 things (that now raise warnings on changeset 17325038).

While I was ready to save the changeset, iD gave a warning about the things I touched (not the ones I created with iD). Not sure what I did, but maybe I attempted to do some suggestion it made (if it was a like without tags, maybe I just added marks like other roads I was doing (but not really aware the line was so huge like noticed weeks later after discovering that there are tools to detect these things).

The warnings sort of snowball with more warnings after trying to fix the current ones (it think it was the first time iD showed an error for something I didn't create myself) and eventually I just clicked save with the suffix "(migth have issues here)". After all, what could possibly go wrong?

So now a tool called OSMCha (which sort of is better to visualize the changes, but did not know it exist) says my changeset  127073124 has "Mapbox: Fictional mapping" (which is factually true) And also is factually true that I ignored the iD warnings. Sorry.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-14 09:52:35+00:00): As it was you 6th edit - fighting with interface and making some mistakes is perfectly normal.

And this one was easy to fix once spotted :)
arichnad (2026-05-29 03:22:52+00:00): Hello Belle Haven Mapper,

Is the Tot Lot gone these days?  I tried to find this back here, and couldn't see it, but I don't go here very often.

I see it in the USGS 3D Elevation Program and I see it in the strava heatmap, but I do not see it on the ground, but maybe I went past it without noticing it.  Or maybe it's gone now? 

Thanks in advance!

arichnad
Belle Haven Mapper (2026-05-29 13:42:24+00:00): Nature is working quickly to reclaim it. Unlike the zone and other trails, since it's just a small loop it doesn't get much traffic so the fallen leaves have heavily (fully) obscured it. This park doesn't currently have a MORE liaison so there hasn't been regular trail work days (and the local teens focus 100% of their energy on the zone).

It's probably worth leaving on the map. Now that it's summer, someone with a rake could clear it in 10 minutes.
arichnad (2026-05-30 22:14:51+00:00): Understood, and I agree with everything you said.  I probably just missed it.  Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-06 22:11:36+00:00): Good thing to do in general for sidewalks along roads since it helps out blind people using navigation apps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127074169
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 08:33:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10078691940/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
literan (2022-10-06 20:11:22+00:00): дворовые территории не являются парками
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
santamariense (2022-10-13 17:50:55+00:00): Olá Marcus Salles,
.
Vi que tu mapeou cruzamento entre ruas e córregos com bridge=yes (ponte)[1] e tunnel=culvert (tubulação)[2]. Na verdade ou é ponte ou é tubulação, nunca ambos.
.
[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101370258
[2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101370254
.
Bons mapeamentos,
santamariense
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
rhtb0 (2022-10-06 05:19:10+00:00): Aplease do use meaningful changeset comments - “1” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Supaplex (2022-10-06 04:27:19+00:00): 請問頂好是收掉還是轉成家樂福超市？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127078162
Liaoszukai0813 (2022-10-07 02:56:08+00:00): 頂好被家樂福收購
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127078162
◪ Jarv (2022-10-07 14:43:09+00:00): Hi Sagajjaq. I see that in this changeset you change a path to a residential road. Looking on Bing this does appear to be a footpath and not accessible to motor vehicles. Can you please confirm that this is a road and not a path.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127078169
sagajjaq (2022-10-10 06:27:35+00:00): Hi, Thank you for reviewing my change set. This is an honest mistake from my end, where I made the edit without checking proper resources. Thanks for highlighting the issue , I've made the necessary changes and would ensure not to repeat such errors again. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,  sagajjaq
brightj (2022-10-06 05:03:37+00:00): Should show up in Climb the World app now
Frans S (2022-10-07 10:31:35+00:00): Hello, also here you did not tag buildings and squared your mappings
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127079087