piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chnav (2019-11-03 08:38:14+00:00): здравствуйте, ваы соверщили несколько ошибок. Первая и самая главная, типичная для всех новичков - вы удаляете здания и перерисовываете заново. так делать КАТЕГОРИЧЕСКИ нельзя. надо изменять, редактировать геометрию, а не удалять и перерисовывать заново.

Вторая ошибка - описательные названия в поле name. Это поле служит только для настоящего названия, всё остальное помещается в поле description. Что такое Нефедовский дом, это какое-то историческое здание с собственным именем ?
mavl (2019-11-03 09:47:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок создаёт некоторые проблемы на карте.  
  
- Удалено здание https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26786947 (на его месте добавлено другое без адреса и других свойств).  
- Одно здание из прямоугольного превращено в трапециевидное (это явно ошибка).  
- Сдвинуты некоторые объекты (похоже, что вы не сдвигаете карту под GPS-треки). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2  
- Мусорные баки помещены прямо на проезды.

Визуально:  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76544785  
  
Я возьму на себя смелость отменить этот пакет правок. Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратны при редактировании карты.
Allison P (2021-02-14 02:02:55+00:00): Can you explain the use of ice_road=yes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3783475293?
skquinn (2021-02-14 03:54:09+00:00): Yes, it's called a "blooper" (i.e. it was added by mistake). I'll delete it shortly.
Hjart (2019-11-03 09:40:34+00:00): Den var tagget som en building=skyway, fordi det er hvad den er ;-)
Palnatoke (2019-11-03 10:26:01+00:00): Lige nu siger den:

Problemer (1)
Bro krydser Vognmagergade

Use a bridge or tunnel
Reposition the features
Ignore this issue
Veje der krydser bygninger bør være broer, tunneller, overdækninger eller indgange.

Det lyder tricky. Skyways (har de et godt dansk navn?) bør vel uproblematisk kunne krydse veje..
Hjart (2019-11-03 10:29:41+00:00): Hvilket værktøj siger det?
Palnatoke (2019-11-03 10:35:25+00:00): iD?
På https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=76544978#map=19/55.68266/12.57799 klikker jeg på broen og får en problembeskrivelse op. Når jeg klikker på 'i'-ikonet, kommer "Veje der krydser bygninger bør være broer, tunneller, overdækninger eller indgange." frem.
Hjart (2019-11-03 10:41:30+00:00): Ok, det har så med det stykke af Vogmagergade, der passerer under skyway'en at gøre. Der er dog IMHO ingen større mening i at tagge det lille stykke vej specielt bare fordi den passerer under en skyway, så jeg vil anbefale at ignorere.
Palnatoke (2019-11-03 10:47:23+00:00): Hvis det ligger i begrebet "skyway" at der kan være en vej under, bør tagget jo slet ikke komme på, men jeg kan udmærket se at det kan være svært (og/eller besværligt) at programmere.
ralley (2020-02-12 09:04:03+00:00): Please dont use the name field to put descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
VictorIE (2023-11-11 15:31:41+00:00): Hi,

I'm just looking through local fixme=* tags. Does this exist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521066553
JonasCz (2023-11-12 05:23:49+00:00): I don't know if this exists. But I added a comment for the original mapper, maybe they know. (which I think is what I should have done 4 years ago, instead of adding a fixme), here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51699140#map=19/54.12378/-7.30388&layers=Y I added the fixme because it doesn't appear on satellite and isn't connected to anything, so I suspect(ed) that maybe it was an editing mistake or something.. I'll see if there's a response to my comment on the original change, the original mapper is still a bit active.
VictorIE (2023-11-12 15:50:32+00:00): Ooops, I meant to send this to the original mapper. :)
Hjart (2019-11-03 10:05:42+00:00): Jeg har ændret tags og fjernet fixme, da den sandsynligvis ikke har noget navn. Jeg fandt også et (lidt bedre) billede på Commons, som jeg har linket til.
TheNoggin (2019-11-04 12:36:30+00:00): Source GPS-Track
berndw (2019-11-03 08:54:20+00:00): Oops, there wasn't only a point at this position, was a complete building.
ChehrehBargi (2020-02-01 18:45:43+00:00): سلام 
جناب vahabzadeh@
متأسفانه پیش از شما هم کاربر fereydoon555@ نام صحیح این کوچه را به نام اشتباه تغییر داده‌اند. برای ثبت اسم باید کاملا مطمئن باشید؛ حتی برای اطمینان از تابلو کوچه کمک بگیرید. نام روی تابلو: کوچه رحمانیه
ChehrehBargi (2020-02-01 18:49:18+00:00): البته الان تارخچه رو مرور کردم و موردی رو اشتباه کردم، جناب fereydoon555@ در این مورد اشتباهی نداشتند.
بنده در همین هفته تصویر mapillary از این کوچه ثبت خواهم کرد
ChehrehBargi (2020-02-02 16:37:06+00:00): تصویر mapillary رو اضافه کردم، البته کوچه تابلو شهرداری نداشت و از اکثر اهالی کوچه پرسیدم و نام کوچه،
هم‌اسم مسجد محله هست. کوچه رحمانیه
user_5359 (2019-11-05 19:30:48+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo of the english name of address:province.
addr:province=الاسكندرية
addr:provinve:en=Alexandria

Could you please modify this?
eggie (2019-11-03 09:25:34+00:00): Dag KnooL  source:date	2014-05-07 beter laten staan. dat zijn de BAG gegevens en horen bij het adres. (Kadaster)
MVG,
Eggie
Parkstad Contributor (2019-11-03 09:37:35+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor de opmerking. Ik ben niet helemaal thuis met OSM. Kun je deze wijziging op 'source:date' ongedaan maken?
eggie (2019-11-03 10:13:28+00:00): no problem  :)
Retired Account (2019-11-10 03:18:33+00:00): Hi,
Why was the residential area removed?
https://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/where2shop/explore/central-area/cheng-yan-court
Map3787 (2019-11-10 04:20:44+00:00): sorry must have done it by accident ill put it back
Heinz_V (2019-11-03 11:31:09+00:00): Since your last changeset there was not enough time to map 370 level_crossings manually.  PLEASE  stop the automatic edits or you will be blocked completely.
pangoSE (2019-11-03 10:39:18+00:00): Hej och välkommen!
Stort tack för ditt bidrag.
Mvh
pangoSE
pangoSE (2019-11-03 10:48:50+00:00): Jag ser att du anvender en udda editor. Jag rekommenderar varmt att ladda ner JOSM på en vanlig dator. Då går det mycket snabbare och smidigare att lägga in grejor.
gabro00 (2020-04-15 15:30:04+00:00): Szia!
Éppen házszámokat validáltam, amikor bukkantam többek közt erre a címre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741601314
Az ilyen {szám}/{szám} formájú címek nem helyrajzi számok (addr:conscriptionnumber), mint a fenti példa is? Néztem Mapillaryn, de abból nekem nem derült ki :/
Leo Slager (2019-11-03 13:25:52+00:00): Die parkeerplaats stond al correct gemapt.
Al die onzinnege en overbodige toevoegingen zijn door een andere mapper al weer weggehaald.

Als je je niet aan normale regels in de wiki wilt houden dan kun je er beter mee ophouden !!
Alle vernielingen die je aanbrengt worden weer teruggedraaid.
dijkmeneer (2019-11-03 16:15:00+00:00): ik mis het deel waar deze parkeerplaats is teruggedraaid.
Leo Slager (2019-11-03 22:57:05+00:00): Ik ben bang dat ik die vraag niet begrijp.
Als je bedoelt dat je de historie van de weg wilt zien, dan kun je weg 741210365 aanklikken en daarna onderaan "Geschiedenis weergeven"
aanklikken. Je ziet dan alle achtereenvolgende wijzigingen van deze weg.
Leo Slager (2019-11-04 16:11:43+00:00): De verbinding tussen de parkeerplaats en de Nieuwe Deventerweg is weggehaald door een andere mapper.
dijkmeneer (2019-11-05 16:32:33+00:00): heb je misschien al gekeken wat de naam was van "die andere mapper" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Leo Slager (2019-11-06 00:47:21+00:00): Bedoel je de weg op de parkeerplaats:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76546782#map=16/52.3973/6.2662

of de weg naar de Nieuwe Deventerweg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76563813#map=19/52.39484/6.26476
eggie (2019-11-03 10:38:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-03 10:42:29+00:00): Let svp op dat je paden niet vastplakt aan andere vlakken.(leisure=nature_reserve) Hier kun je zien waar. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76546666
Dat is de reden dat het editgebied zo groot is geworden. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-03 10:51:36+00:00): leisure nature reserve losgenaakt van fietspad.
Wat is je bron dat je weet dat de fietspaden en tracks anders lopen.
Door het bladerdek zie je immers niets?
Ik heb e.e.a. hersteld mbv de BGT omtrekgericht. 
Dat is een transparant van de Landmeetkundige dienst.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-03 10:44:18+00:00): Joep. Begin NOOIT met access=no  Dat is een gebiedsverbod voor iedereen.
Weghalen dus svp.
foot=yes is default op wegen en paden. Dat kan ook weg.
MVG,
Eggie

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76546795
eggie (2019-11-03 10:58:54+00:00): Wanneer je vanuit je vakgebied wilt mappen stap dan over naar een betere editor als JOSM. Editor iD is meer een speeltje.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

BGT implementeren (zelf instellen)
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
(en de simpele wijze)
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Succes,
Eggie
Frans S (2019-11-06 12:42:07+00:00): Hello Pazza.
Thanks for your mappings on this project
Please be more accurate in mapping buildings. Take your time for it.
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery.  See the Instructions.

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the righthand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degr angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degr corners
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
UAN51 (2019-11-13 21:23:32+00:00): Volunteer responding - Pleasant Valley Road Athletic Complex should be a park because KCMO Parks and Rec own this land. It's also labeled as a park in the Parcel Viewer.
Adamant1 (2019-11-13 22:10:28+00:00): "Pleasant Valley Road Athletic Complex should be a park because KCMO Parks and Rec own this land" 

Not to be a jerk, but I'm tired of having these conversations. No where in the park or sports complex wiki pages does it say their usage depends on who owns the entity. Its about the activity that takes place there. If you want to show that, use the operator tag or something. Or if you think tagging should be based on who owns an object take it up with the mailing list. Then we can start re-tagging all the random buildings, roads, industrial areas, etc etc owned by parks departs out there as leisure=park just because they have the @-$& name "park" in their title. Along with parking lots and every other called park, resembling a park, or what the @$&$_ ever. In the mean time though I'm 100% percent behind this being tagged as a sports complex instead. Especially considering that's what the $&#- people who created and maintain the _&## thing consider it., but even if they didn't we tag things based on our own definitions. Not how some government entity does. Otherwise the crap would be completely useless crap right now. It almost is in places where people take a fundementalist "government GIS rules all" approach. 99% of my time is spent cleaning up their crap imports from so called "better" sources, but hey your local GIS departments must know best. SMH

(Don't take any of that personally. I just have this conversation a lot and its pretty tiring and at my wits end about it. I see something miss-tagged based on how the wiki and OSMs conventions define things. Then people come to me and go off (not that I'm saying you are) like its my issue when its not. I'm just following what OSM says to do).
PT-53 (2019-11-03 17:11:35+00:00): Hallo Pete909,
Du hast diesen "Wald"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741608143/history
neu eingezeichnet.
Ich kann da auf dem Luftbild allerdings keinen "Wald" sondern nur einen  einzelnen Baum erkennen.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Kovoschiz (2019-11-03 20:26:38+00:00): Why would you do this?
Wright One (2019-11-04 01:54:59+00:00): 因為37B/X由莊士敦道入灣仔道會出現起角
勁核突肉酸
改雙線係解決方法
（交通地圖應該仲見到）
Kovoschiz (2019-11-23 19:27:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77467013 Reverted after Discord discussion found Inappropriate.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-23 19:43:52+00:00): Reimplemented https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77467356
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
kayle (2019-11-04 10:53:16+00:00): Len zo zvedavosti, čo má predstavovať značka "colour=green" na to jazere? Farbu vody? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253017952
Kristína96 (2019-11-04 11:19:43+00:00): Táto úprava tam už bola, ja jediné čo som zmenila bol názov jazera.
Inak uprimne sa v tejto stránke moc nevyznám, a neviem s ňou pracovať. :D
Potrebovali sme len zmeniť názov jazera na jeho správne znenie a odkázali nás na túto stránku.
kayle (2019-11-04 11:29:58+00:00): No bolo to v tejto zmene vykonané.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76387489
Áno, na prvý krát to je dosť komplikované, len som
Mimochodom ešte jedna vec. Je to označené ako jazerom ktoré nemusí mať stále vodu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:intermittent
Vyzerá to ako nejaká stará ťažobná jama. Tá voda tam nie je celý rok? Alebo to je len chyba pri úprave? ďakujem
Kristína96 (2019-11-04 11:34:15+00:00): Ak to bolo v zmene vykonané, tak len, že som to možno nechtiac odstránila a vrátila, keďže, ako píšete na prvý krát to bolo pre mňa dosť komplikované.
Ak by som Vás mohla poprosiť teda o úpravu, ak sú niektoré veci doslova "mimo". 
Voda tam je celý rok, bude to chyba.
kayle (2019-11-04 11:39:51+00:00): Ok opravené, vďaka.
Kristína96 (2019-11-04 11:41:42+00:00): Aj ja ďakujem :)
mueschel (2019-11-04 06:36:56+00:00): Hi,
you added about 700 buildings with the tag 'addr:provinve:en' - there is a spelling mistake, it's 'province', not 'provinve'. Could you check and fix this?
Warin61 (2019-11-05 23:50:25+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Some problems with relation 741640374.

As a guide .. one OSM element is best when it is one real thing, not a bridge + a building + a station. 

A multiploygon relation outer ways should not touch nor share segments. 

A bridge usually goes over the top of things, in OSM the layer=* tag is used to indicate what is over or under the 'normal' layer. 

---------------
Use the OSM wiki to get details ..
e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation 
So the easiest thing to do is use a node rather than try to define an area. However this has already been done so your entry is a duplicate of it. 

The 'building' is probably the south western section of the relation - so tag that way as the building - 2 story? The 'bridge' the north easter section, bridge=yes, layer=1?
Warin61 (2019-11-05 23:56:07+00:00): Opps got the relationship number wrong it is 10253313
LysaraBlackwood (2019-11-07 11:14:27+00:00): Thanks,  Warin61, I was beyond my depth trying   to represent the new station at Bayswater.  I'll try to fix it on the weekend.  The station entrance is now at the NW, the walkway goes over the cyclepath and one of the rail tracks, then you can go down stairs, a ramp or an elevator to the platform.  The node was where people previously entered the station from an underpass & doesn't represent the present access to the platforms.
LysaraBlackwood (2019-11-07 11:21:27+00:00): You go up steps or a ramp to get to the station entrance, so no the station building isn't strictly 2 storey on the western side,  even though it goes over the cycle path & track.
Warin61 (2019-11-07 22:50:42+00:00): OK,

So the building is elevated ..  tag it layer=1, this way it goes 'over' other things on the 'ground' (which is the default of layer=0). 

I have made a few changes... layer=1 to a few things, added entrance=yes. You will need to add 

'exit' to the platforms. 
lifts (highway=elevator in OSM)
the stair that goes nowhere should have a corridor from it.
The phone .. is that at layer=1? 

And probably many other details .. 

Oh .. the Maxar Preimum Imagery looks to be up to date?

Hope that helps.
eggie (2019-11-03 11:07:08+00:00): Je gebruikt BING als achtergrond. Die is outdated en ligt er vele meters naast.
Gebruik svp de PDOK actueel
Eggie
JoepStienen (2019-11-03 11:13:25+00:00): Hmmm,
ik geloof dat ik hier maar niet aan begin en mijn vrije tijd beter ontspannen benut.
Joep
eggie (2019-11-03 11:18:27+00:00): Joep.. Zie het niet als kritiek. Lees je even in. In het begin worden edits gevolgd en gevalideerd.
Ook om te assisteren. OSM lijkt erg simpel in elkaar te zitten, maar is het verre van dat. Maar laat je niet weerhouden!
MVG,
Eggie
JoepStienen (2019-11-03 11:23:52+00:00): Is ook geen probleem, alleen denk ik dat het op dit moment voor mij niet opportuun is er veel tijd in te steken. Ik heb al genoeg uitdagingen op het gebied van 3D design, dus daar concentreer ik me dan nu liever op. Dit was meer als ontspanning bedoeld.
mvrgr
Joep
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
aquarix (2019-11-04 12:56:56+00:00): Hallo trieger,
wenn du mehrere Objekte in verschiedenen Ländern hinzufügst splitte das bitte mind. nach Land auf. Sprich: Lade deine bisherigen Änderungen hoch bevor du in einem anderen Land zu editieren beginnst. 
Das macht die Sache übersichtlicher.
Gruß aquarix
eggie (2019-11-03 12:00:57+00:00): Toch maar even meer volgens de werkelijkheid aangepast.  bron Kadaster en pdok.
eggie (2019-11-03 12:12:30+00:00): review. Op verschillende plaatsen overlapt de landuse . http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76548504
Je moet in dit werk gewoon per onderdeel veel meer tijd steken. Het gaat om de kwaliteit en niet de kwantiteit.
Het gaat allemaal in een hoog tempo en Daar wordt de kaart niet beter van. 
De overlap er dus uithalen. Landuse netjes laten aansluiten svp. 
Waarom die stukken akkerland er tussendoor. Is dat hier werkelijk zo? . of bedoel je wellicht iets anders met farmland? 
We gebruiken farmland in Nederland voor akkerbouw.. Voor grasland zijn meer mogelijkheden. Ligt aan de functie. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-03 12:18:33+00:00): .. of bedoel je hier misschien natural=scrub.. Dus bosschages?
Bij sommige stukken heb je keurig de paden vrij gelaten,.. bij andere weer niet.. Dus hier werk aan de winkel om er wat moois van de maken.
eggie (2019-11-03 12:34:30+00:00): Eigenlijk is dit ingericht als een park wellicht met naam?
Er kan over de landuse een los vlak gelegd worden met leisure=park.. Dat is een transparant. Je ziet daar de landuse doorheen. 
Dat farmland lijkt me niet correct hier. Zijn dat hier bieten, aardappelen?
Je kunt ook losse bomen toevoegen met natural=tree op nodes... en bankjes
dvdhoven (2019-11-03 12:40:34+00:00): Daar ligt geen farmland!
Allemaal gras.
Dit is een toekomstige woonwijk
dijkmeneer (2019-11-03 12:42:53+00:00): is het zo goed? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76550218)
Robert46798 (2019-11-03 19:20:44+00:00): Hallo celkur,

wilkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Ergänzung!

Ich habe mir deine Änderung angeschaut, weil du die entsprechende Option beim hochladen ausgewählt hast.

Ich bin kein Experte was das Eintragen des ÖPNV angeht. Allerdings scheint mir deine Eintragung bei "name" verdächtig. Unter name=* soll ausschließlich der Haltestellenname stehen (i. d. R. wie er an dem Schild steht). Ich vermute, dass ist in diesem Fall "Hasselbachplatz".

Zusätzliche Informationen können unter decription=* eingetragen werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description).

Sollte die Haltestelle den entsprechenden, langen Namen haben ist alles korrekt!

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-24 05:56:54+00:00): Please, do not attempt to hide unwanted edits by making throwaway accounts like https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/7JKgGzG6OmxIyxUxqoTU
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-24 07:03:19+00:00): Making map better is welcomed! But please, consider local survey. In case of validator-based improvements - please actually verify your edits, be careful and do not make hundreds of edits at once.

Creating fake railway because of dragging node across India is not helpful and breaks map for everybody.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-11-16 15:19:31+00:00): Zdravo,
Jel stvarno ne postoji vise "Козарчева 95", vidim da si je izbrisao? Pitam posto vidim da si nov, pa rekoh samo da proverim da nije neka greska slucajno, nista vise!:)
perkonja (2019-11-16 15:23:39+00:00): Sad kad pogledam, da budem iskren, ne znam kako sam to uradio. Greška je, upravo kao što i kažeš...
Branko Kokanovic (2019-11-16 15:30:20+00:00): Ma nije problem, desi se:) Ako nemas vremena/ne zelis, mogu i ja da vratim, samo mi reci, da znam:)

BTW, pitaj slobodno ako nesto treba!
perkonja (2019-11-16 15:32:44+00:00): Pa, bilo bi zgodno ako ti vratiš 😅
Branko Kokanovic (2019-11-16 15:37:56+00:00): evo vraceno:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77167864
;)
perkonja (2019-11-16 15:38:30+00:00): Hvala na saradnji
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
user_11166885 (2020-05-15 09:01:44+00:00): Is there?
mavl (2019-11-17 13:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
user_14043589 (2022-01-02 22:55:37+00:00): dove sarebbe l'edicola votiva?
canfe (2022-01-03 07:41:54+00:00): Qui:
https://www.google.it/maps/@44.6944953,7.9106676,3a,44.7y,155.6h,103.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sw0uMZ0M9UxYqxGa1nutfig!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=it