piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-11-23 17:35:24+00:00): Beste GH
Volgens mij is dit toch duidelijk besproken op het forum. Routeren doet het nu niet meer voor tweewielers. 
Je mag hier gewoon met de fiets in. 
highway=footway gebruiken we als er een wandelpad is aangegeven met het bord met de wandelaar met kind.
highway=path in andere gevallen.
Wanneer je dit wilt veranderen doe je een voorstel op het forum en als iedereen het daarmee eens is dan gaan we allemaal footway taggen.
In dit geval is highway=path de goede tagging. Ik draai je changeset terug. Heb je contact gehad met de voorgaande medemapper? 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-23 17:40:29+00:00): GH
reverted by changeset #77464894
De changeset heb ik teruggezet naar de juiste tagging van de voorgaande mapper. Neem contact op met je medemapper en vernader het als je er beiden uit bent.
MVG,
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 17:54:42+00:00): Dan moet je gewoon een lesje Engels krijgen. Je kan ook met bicycle=yes  fietsers toe laten.
eggie (2019-11-23 18:51:17+00:00): Het is gebruikelijk om contact op te nemen met de voorgaande mapper en/of hem of haar in ieder geval te berichten. Dan kun je uitleggen waarom je iets veranderd hebt. Dat kun je alsnog doen. Lees nog eens in het forum waarom we in dit geval highway=path gebruiken. 
In de historie vind je de naam van de voorgaande mapper.
Mvg
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 19:48:54+00:00): Bij elke wijziging krijg je toch standaard een berichtje?
Higway = path of trail wordt gebruikt bij een spoor die door wandelaars zelf zijn ontstaan. Bijvoorbeeld in een bos, park, duingebied, strand, etc. 

Een trail is niets anders dan een pad die door de natuur of uit zichzelf is ontstaan.

"This tag is used for paths for which all and any of highway=footway, highway=cycleway and highway=bridleway would be inappropriate or inadequate (or simply not sufficient), but which are nonetheless usable for travel or navigation."

Dus wanneer het niet gepast zou zijn om aan te geven dat het een voetpad, fietspad, fietspad of ruiterpad is gebruik je pas deze tag.

"For urban paths which are designated for pedestrians only, it's better to use highway=footway."

Voor stedelijke paden (of Nederlands: Urbaan) die alleen voor voetgangers bestemd (of gemaakt) zijn is het beter om highway=footway te gebruiken.

Het staat er allemaal duidelijk in.
Dit is dus duidelijk geen path.
eggie (2019-11-23 20:09:25+00:00): Lees nog eens wat de consensus is zoals medemapper A67-A67 beschrijft. 
Dat is de consensus waar we ons aan houden uitzonderingen daargelaten.
Het is dus zaak om tags van andere mappers niet zomaar te veranderen met als gevolg dat het niet meer goed routeert.
Dat is mijn enige punt.
Wanneer je iets wilt veranderen bericht dan de voorgaande mapper.
Jij maakte er eerst footway van.. resultaat.. het routeerde niet meer voor tweewielers... Na revert maakte je er een fietspad van... Waarom?
Ik stop met duscussie op de changeset.Je kunt aanhaken in het draadje op het forum.
Dan stel je voor dat we path alleen nog maar gebruiken voor bospaadjes. Wanneer dat de consensus wordt ga ik daar in mee. Waarom niet.
Tot op het forum.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 20:10:53+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=770002#p770002
eggie (2019-11-22 07:30:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Wanneer de wegen en de gebouwen weg zijn kun je ze van de kaart verwijderen. wanneer dat niet het geval is en alleen het bedrijf is verhuisd dan natuurlijk niet.
Zijn de gebouwen inmiddels gesloopt?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-22 07:46:39+00:00): Het gebied heb ik even vervangen door landuse=brownfield. Zodra er weer wordt gebouwd kun je het vervangen door landuse=construction
De parkeerplaats heb ik ook vervangen door brownfield en de nieuwe straten als construction ingetekend. Up to you om het aan te passen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-22 09:05:57+00:00): De nieuwe parkeerplaatsen bij de Roosjesweg heb ik vast ingetekend. 
Wat nog niet klopt kun je uiteraard aanpassen.
Gr eggie
mariotomo (2019-11-25 16:02:54+00:00): Hola, sin poner en duda, por supuesto que no, que los cambios fueron justos y necesarios, pero podrías comentarlos en manera que se entienda qué cambiaste?  si corregiste un problema, como te has enterado?  o sea, para que otros puedan aprovechar de tus ediciones.  ten en cuenta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
osmviborg (2019-11-22 07:34:18+00:00): Gendannet
sskalyan (2019-12-28 09:25:00+00:00): Hi,

Reverting your edits, classificatio to residential.

thanks,
kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77404275
sskalyan (2019-12-28 09:26:12+00:00): *road class
santamariense (2019-11-26 19:51:49+00:00): Hello AlwaysSunnyInMapadelphia,
!Tip-off!
In Portuguese, there are both "Marques" and "Marquês". The first one stands for the last name that goes after the name, and the second one stands for a nobleman ranking, translated to English it's "Marquis", and it comes before the name.
Good mapping!
santamariense
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77404337
Sawan Shariar (2019-12-03 05:35:06+00:00): Hi Jins,
I am appreciated your great job for humanity. Please use the Maxar Standard Imagery. It is the updated one right now.
Thank you.
tux67 (2019-11-22 09:37:09+00:00): Hi,
these ways are entering a school yard - and even if there is a gps track pointing there - knowing german schools I massively doubt that there is general access for motor vehicles allowed.
BR tux67
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747970238
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747970237
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77405199
jaravn (2019-11-22 11:03:04+00:00): Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Added these roads on basis of GPS traces and latest aerial image.Could you please suggest if we can add roads in school zones or not. If added what will be the access tag for the segment. Will take this as learning for future edits. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
jaravn.
tux67 (2019-11-22 11:28:41+00:00): We had this discussion before:
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/74841776
I would recommend not to add ways  that can be used by a motor vehicle on a schoolyard until this is clearly supported by on the ground confirmation (street level pictures , local mapper).
BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77405199
user_5359 (2019-11-22 05:11:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
wireguy (2019-11-22 12:44:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Your service roads look good, but the parking should just be an area with one tag.  I've made the change.   I don't think tunnel was correct either, tunnel is for underground things.  I took a guess and changed that service to covered=yes.  Keep up the mapping.
If you want to get in touch with other mappers, please join our Slack community at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ . Friendly people there and a NJ channel.
sskalyan (2019-12-28 08:39:09+00:00): Hi,

Reverting your edits, modified road class to residenntial road. 

thanks,
Kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77406024
user_5359 (2019-12-14 13:28:22+00:00): Hello! You add in different change sets a bigger number of unknown tags 
"Aspect"
"Distance from motorable road"
"Distance from water source"
"Existing vegetation cover %"
"Slope gradient %"
"elevation"
"soil type"
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:50:40+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found tags like the ones listed below on several objects. 
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a look at the wiki about common tags.
In the current form, this data is useless.


Let us know in case you need help!

Jan


Distance from motor able road
Distance from motorable road
Distance from motorable road head
Distance from nearest water source
Distance from road
distance from the road
Distance from waret source
Distance from water source
distance from water source
Existing vegetation %
Existing vegetation cover
Existing vegetation cover %
existing vegetation cover %
slope gradient
Slope gradient
slope gradient %
Slope gradient %
aspect
elevation
soil type
Soil type
topography %
mueschel (2019-12-29 15:20:10+00:00): May I remind you of the concerns raised by several people regarding your edits? Are you still going to clean up the tags or should we remove your data again? In the current state it is useless for all other OSM users.
user_5359 (2019-11-22 18:08:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
dgitto (2019-11-25 18:12:52+00:00): The tag used are totally new to OSM. with no meaning.
please take a look at the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
dgitto (2019-11-25 18:17:44+00:00): Distance from road=500-1000 mts.
Distance from water source=500-1000 mts
Existing vegetation %=26-35%
aspect=SW
description=TGD
elevation=980 masl
name=PS
topography %=30-45%

You don't have to invent new tags. You should use pre-defined tags.
tomhukins (2019-11-22 20:33:15+00:00): This looks like spam.  You seem to have made little effort to understand how to tag properly for OpenStreetMap to help improve the data.  It's great that you want to help improve the map, but please don't invent your own tags: take some time to understand how things work here.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-11-22 06:36:01+00:00): Ukraine:Fixed "Crossing building/highway";"Crossing highway";"Crossing highway/waterway ";"Crossing building" issues;improved geometry
abakus_uploader (2019-11-22 23:32:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
luiswoo (2019-11-22 16:52:48+00:00): Snezha, ваши правки нужно сразу откатывать, или вы всё же освоите принятый формат нумерации?
luiswoo (2019-11-22 17:18:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
luiswoo (2019-11-22 17:21:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
WoodWoseWulf (2019-11-22 06:50:24+00:00): Added in changeset #77408571
WoodWoseWulf (2019-11-22 06:50:53+00:00): Whoops, that was intended for the note on this park 😅
abakus_uploader (2019-11-22 23:32:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:58:55+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
The tags you are using on this node are not common and are not documented.

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

Your added nodes only have tags that are not used in any other place and can't be used for maps.

Jan
user_5359 (2019-11-22 19:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the opening_hours value. Your value "Open 24 hours Weekly" isn't very exactly: Did you mean 24/7 or 4 hours per day?
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:51:26+00:00): In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

Your added nodes only have only tags that are not used in any other place and can't be used for maps.

Jan
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 04:27:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473972 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:56:50+00:00): This changeset was reverted in 77455010 - all the objects don't contain useful information and were uploaded at least 20 times in the last weeks.
General Updating (2020-09-21 14:01:40+00:00): Dear pathkh,

if your employer allows it please feel free to delete non-existing TIGER ways like https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/12552497

Kind regards
pathkh (2020-09-22 08:52:36+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the inputs. I assure you, we are doing the same wherever it is necessary. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
pathkh.
jtracey (2019-11-22 19:48:35+00:00): Some of these are very obviously not real. I'm going to revert all your edits. If this was a mistake, please let me know, otherwise I'll have to report for vandalism.
jtracey (2019-11-22 19:44:31+00:00): This embassy clearly does not exist. What was it you were trying to do here?
aquarix (2019-11-22 12:21:43+00:00): Hello nicolas_bellemans,
welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please do other OSM contributors a favour and narrow your changesets to a certain region. In this case you added items on three different continents. Normally you only edit items in only one country per changeset. This makes quality assurance a lot easier.
Regards aquarix
Vinber (2019-11-26 05:00:20+00:00): Bonjour,
et bienvenue !
Je me suis permis de retirer le name=route résidentiels prise par les camions poubelle qui n'est pas un nom mais une description. Si cette route a un nom, alors n'hésitez pas à le renseigner.
Bonne journée
eggie (2019-11-22 10:54:38+00:00): Beste Groen Weert. je zet met access=no de paden op slot voor iedereen. Op een highway = footway routeert het alleen voor voetgangers. 
access=no zal er dus af "moeten".
access=no alleen gebruiken voor een gebiedsverbod. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-11-22 11:02:06+00:00): access no heb ik verwijderd. 
Het zal nu ook beter renderen. Je zag de paden nauwelijks
Gr eggie
Groen Weert (2019-11-24 14:24:10+00:00): Dankuwel Eggie
Ik ga deze tips ter harte nemen/uitvoeren.
Ook bedankt voor het aanpassen
Groet, Piet
zstadler (2021-12-30 14:35:00+00:00): Dear Olenka,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

In this changeset, created about 2 years ago, you have tagged tracks with tracktype=grade5. Over all, you have added tracktype tags for dozens of tracks in Israel.

I wonder if at the time you were aware of the OSM Israel mapping conventions for tracks -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Conventions_for_Hiking_and_Biking_Trails

Thanks!
zstadler (2022-01-17 16:03:01+00:00): The facts on the ground in several places show that the tagging was not done according to the OSM Israel mapping conventions for tracks.

Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116260514 removed all added tracktype tags that not modified later on.
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:57:59+00:00): Reminder:
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

Your added nodes only have only tags that are not used in any other place and can't be used for maps.

Jan
mueschel (2019-11-23 09:51:43+00:00): In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

Your added nodes only have only tags that are not used in any other place and can't be used for maps.

Jan
Bakhadir (2019-11-22 11:50:40+00:00): Не знаю что там Вы нашли неправильного,  но Вы сравните снимок спутника с дорогами с отката, дороги не совпадают с дорогами нарисованы криво или же не по дороге, некоторые дороги вообще не существует (те что нарисованы) или отсутствуют.
chnav (2019-11-22 12:47:38+00:00): Я исправил и спрямил проезды.
skquinn (2019-11-22 16:00:22+00:00): Again, "edit" tells us nothing and this is way too big of a bounding box, stretching clear across the Atlantic Ocean.
jaap de vries (2019-11-22 14:11:06+00:00): Deze heb je dan wel correct toegevoegd
jaap de vries (2019-11-22 14:08:45+00:00): Ook hier de poi op het bestaande adres gezet.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 04:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473993 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
canfe (2019-11-22 11:39:08+00:00): Son un po' perplesso sull'inserimento di
lanes=2
è vero che ce ne sono due, ma ogni strada in zona, tranne i pochi sensi unici ne ha due.
Prendendo l'esempio di quella che va da Robassomero verso Fiano, ci passano due auto facendo attenzione. La riga di mezzeria spesso non c'è proprio perché è stretta. vedo invece 2 lanes sulla provinciale 1 in corrispondenza dei semafori.
Martj9 (2019-11-22 12:59:37+00:00): Non ho capito il punto di non poter mettere un valore, per quanto ovvio e ridondante esso sia. Comunque certamente puoi correggere qualsiasi posto che ti sembra sbagliato, soprattutto se sei del luogo, e ne sarei felice. Le mie modifiche derivano da un giro che ho fatto ieri sera.

Quel che trovo leggermente inquietante, ma forse mi sfuggono alcune dinamiche di funzionamento di OSM, è un controllo un paio d'ore dopo una mia modifica, come se qualcuno la stesse aspettando. Su un tipo di tag peraltro che non provoca modifiche "estetiche" che uno possa notare per caso.
canfe (2019-11-22 16:23:00+00:00): Si, son del posto e per il resto concordo con te sulla ridondanza ma anche sul fatto che non cambia nulla sul rendering.

Mi interessava più capire la "filosofia" che c'era dietro.

In quanto al "controllo": sì è vero, faccio digital patrolling. Uso degli rss per verificare più volte al giorno il mio "areale" che corrisponde più o meno al bacino idrografico della Stura di Lanzo.
Tranquillo, nessun agguato. Controllo tutti indistintamente e cerco di colloquiare per correggere ma anche per imparare.


Perché non vieni a qualche nostra riunione? Vuoi in passaggio a Ivrea per la Prossima?
Martj9 (2019-11-22 17:27:20+00:00): La filosofia è questa:
Siccome mi interesso abbastanza di piccole strade extraurbane (non che siano la mia passione, ma per i luoghi che mappo mi capitano molto spesso), tanti anni fa mi sono posto il problema delle strade con queste caratteristiche: striscia centrale assente, larghezza modesta ma vaga, corsie non definite, ecc.
Perciò sono andato a vedere sul wiki. Mi ricordo molto bene ancora oggi qual era la strada che mi ha fatto sorgere il dubbio e spinto a controllare. C'era scritto di mettere in questi casi 2 lanes per indicare che il traffico si svolge in due direzioni contemporaneamente, anche se bisogna rallentare perchè è stretto o manca una striscia centrale delimitante, ciò per distinguerle dalle strade che, sebbene a doppio senso, sono troppo strette per un passaggio contemporaneo e le vetture devono passare una alla volta. Ciò a quel tempo.
Così preso dal dubbio sono andato a guardare di nuovo. L'uso del tag più o meno è sempre quello, ma c'è una cosa in più: lane_markings=no. (Parlo della pagina Key:lanes, nel terzo esempio fotografico indicato, appunto, con lanes=2 e lane_markings=no)
Ora, da una parte sono contento di avere un tag in più che definisca le situazioni, ma dall'altra mi girano le bolas per il fatto che ora c'è un tag aggiuntivo da chissà quanto e io non lo conoscevo. Che dovrei fare, aggiungerlo in tutti i milioni di strade che ho taggato in questi anni? Non posso farmi la rassegna periodica dell'intera wiki per vedere se e quando cambiano le carte in tavola. Boh
Comunque, lane_markings o meno, lanes=2 dovrebbe essere corretto, al limite è incompleto.

Riguardo alla riunione non lo so, magari vengo, a Ivrea non dovrebbe essere un lavoraccio arrivare in treno, spero solo che non finisca tardi. Ma per questo forse è meglio se ti mando un messaggio nella casella, non so se è pertinente al changeset
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 04:32:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474005 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 04:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77474019 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
opencarpatia (2021-01-07 22:20:37+00:00): I am going to delete this fake culvert you've added to "fix highway/waterway" crossing.

I am asking you to STOP doing such edits without: a) onsite inspection b) using street imagery c) using survey from reliable sources.

Using aerial images is NOT sufficient for this king of "fixing". You basically add lot of fake unverified information to the OSM by using "aerial verification". You also "hide" unresolved warnings from other mappers -- they are confident warning was resovled.

If you continue to introduce fake information - we will initiate a campaign to block your edits in Ulraine.
opencarpatia (2021-01-07 22:28:42+00:00): Fake culvert deleted with following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97132820
Dimitar155 (2021-07-22 19:44:24+00:00): Bonjour danielmont. Puis-je vous demander pourquoi vous avez ajouté un nom à https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168078242 ? Il a un nom différent de celui de la rivière et normalement les zones de rivière ne devraient pas avoir de nom. Pouvez-vous le vérifier s'il vous plaît ? Merci d'avance.
eggie (2019-11-22 10:31:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Lijkt me prima gelukt. 
MVG,
Eggie
Markus366 (2019-11-23 14:54:36+00:00): Hallo und Wilkommen bei OSM. Ich glaube dass bei deinen Einträgen ein paar Details nicht ganz richtig gemacht:

1) Du hast Einträge in Berlin und Thüringen gemacht, war das so beabsichtigt?

2) Namen von Personen geben wir nur an, wenn diese als Firmenname oder Betreiber einer Firma veröffentlicht wurden. Ist das hier so?

3) Wenn es Firmen oder Einrichtungen sind, die du eintragen wolltest, dann fehlen Hinweise darauf, Was für eine Art von Firma. Andere Details wie Telefonnummer, website, Adressen etc wären auch gut.

4) Einen Eintrag eines office hast  du auf einer Straße platziert, der müsste aber eigentlich links/rechts neben der Straße liegen

Wenn du dabei Hilfe brachst, sag Bescheid.

Markus