piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Thomas8122 (2019-11-14 17:48:45+00:00): Kannst du bitte aufhören an alles was definitiv keine Adresse hat eine Pseudoadresse dranzuklatschen. Das ist ist nicht hilfreich und sinnbefreit. Danke
(hier meine ich den Zigarettenautomaten)
Minh Nguyen (2019-11-13 08:02:36+00:00): CAGIS 2019 orthophotography was a source for these changes.
Dimacn (2019-11-13 14:28:54+00:00): Для внесения адресной информации для домов существуют определённые теги, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Не надо писать названия жилым домам в name. В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-24 10:52:08+00:00): It appears that numerous paths in this changeset do not exist.
TheSwavu (2021-02-25 20:42:15+00:00): Are you using the DCS imagery? Except for a short segment near Minmi Rd these footpaths are visible on the imagery. Are you saying that they have been removed?
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-25 22:12:24+00:00): I did not say none of them existed. I removed 3 sections that are not on DCS imagery. See https://osmcha.org/changesets/99953973
TheSwavu (2021-02-25 22:38:42+00:00): For future reference 3 is not "numerous". From your original comment I thought there was supposed to be a real problem. If you had said 3 (which apparently you knew) then I would not have bothered to waste my time checking to see what the problem was.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-25 22:54:58+00:00): Three was not known at the time. Numerous is subjective, I saw long stretches of fake footpath and then fixed it up the following day.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-25 22:55:20+00:00): I'm also not done checking over it, so there may be more.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-25 22:55:59+00:00): Thus why I didn't yet leave a comment stating that it was fixed.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-25 22:59:19+00:00): Checking further changes, there are more that I need to fix up, such as left side of Gundaine Close.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-26 00:27:21+00:00): Remainder fictional of paths were cleaned up in #100008765. Original comment resolved.
PJ1342 (2021-02-26 09:16:01+00:00): Hello, sorry for the late reply. I can't remember from the top of my head what imagery i used as it was over 1 year ago i only just got the emails today. If you think it is incorrect feel free to change it. Thanks PJ1342.
eggie (2019-11-13 09:21:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-13 09:29:46+00:00): Dag Rick,  Heb je enig idee welke landuse hier dan wel thuishoort?
MVG,
Eggie
rickvangrinsven (2019-11-13 09:31:06+00:00): Hey Eggie, misschien de verkeerde omschrijving gebruikt maar ik heb de markers verplaatst rondom het kavel
eggie (2019-11-13 09:38:19+00:00): Oke... , maar je kunt wel invullen (intekenen) waaruit de landuse bestaat. landuse=grass, meadow, farmland?  
Wanneer het bij de bebouwing (woningen)  hoort kun je evt. de landuse = residential wat opschuiven.
Het erf van een agrarisch bedrij kun je ook intekeen met landsue=farmyard
Up to you
Succes,
Eggie
SomeoneElse2 (2025-01-18 15:55:16+00:00): Hello - a quick question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742792269/history .  That was a "bridge=aqueduct" and "layer=1".  It then changed to "bridge=aqueduct", "tunnel=culvert" and "layer=-1".  I'm guessing that this might have been by accident, or is this bridge somehow also a tunnel (it doesn't look like one on the imagery)?
Best Regards,
Andy
James Derrick (2025-01-20 08:58:25+00:00): Hi,
Looking back some years, I'm not finding direct cycle survey images so this must be an "armchair" edit from imagery and local knowledge from nearby roads.

A fair chunk of this leet is in a "cutting" (presumably to reduce evaporation and to reduce gravity flow) so was tagged layer=-1 (see the way the accommodation bridges go up from ground level). It later goes fully underground to get to Matfen.

Comparing current Bing and ESRI, this looks to be a box structure moving from cutting to embankment with the waterway=stream at an even lower level in a presumably eroded stream bed N-S.

The stream may be better tunnel=culvert + layer=-1, and remove the layer=-1 from the leet, as this is the point where this -1 tagging was ended.

It's complicated as you can see the lower level of Whittledean threading over this stream and over a road - so aqueduct + -1 sounds odd, but... !

Thoughts?

Happy Mapping,

James
SomeoneElse (2025-01-21 01:45:25+00:00): Looking at the wider area on imagery there's definitely more tunnel=culvert that I'd have expected - I guess it's below ground level, but there's nothing over the top of it (apart from the bridges).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742792269/history looks like an aqueduct with nothing over the top of it and the stream underneath?
James Derrick (2025-01-21 10:47:44+00:00): Hi,

> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742792269/history
>looks like an aqueduct with nothing over the top of it and the stream underneath? 

Agree - more of a "surface aqueduct" to bridge over a small river valley depression than a soaring structure.

I've made the changes described above to the structure:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742792269/history

The next way is the upper section of the leet itself. It does seem in an open cutting (layer=-1) rather than a tunnel=culvert , so I've swapped to cutting=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161595012

JOSM validation doesn't like the result, but we tag for reality (don't remember cutting=yes, so one to add to the toolbox).

Does that seem better?

Happy Mapping,

James
SomeoneElse (2025-01-21 10:53:56+00:00): Yes (with the big caveat that I'm not at all familiar with the area!).

Thanks,
Andy
abakus_uploader (2019-11-13 23:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
lyctkel (2022-06-17 06:21:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, LidaCity,
В настоящее время я исследую некоторые редко используемые теги building=*.
В процессе я нашел https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231741528, который использует building=р.
Этот тег используется только один раз.
С моей точки зрения, building=yes подошел бы лучше.
Возможно, вы имели в виду name=p
Смотрите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building для подробностей.
Реградс,
lyctkel
PS: Извините за смешные слова, это машинный перевод.

Переведено с помощью www.DeepL.com/Translator (бесплатная версия)
LidaCity (2022-06-18 05:58:30+00:00): hello
thanks
i'm fix it
lyctkel (2022-06-18 06:00:53+00:00): Great!
viloan (2019-11-13 08:59:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-11-13 10:02:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-13 10:34:34+00:00): Gumuz.. Het is helemaal goed gegaan. Dat je nog iets ziet wat niet klopt komt door de rendering in verschillende niveaus. Dat heeft tijd nodig. CTRL-F5 help weleens. 
Wel is het zo dat tweewielers vaak uitgezonderd zijn van eenrichting. Je kun dan een regel toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
en evt.
oneway:moped=no
Zie ook Nieuwe Looierstraat.
MVG,
Eggie
chnav (2019-12-20 07:33:15+00:00): Fake objects, wrong tags deleted. Map cleanup.
ToniE (2019-11-13 10:49:53+00:00): Hallo Luis,

Weißt Du zufällig, bis wann die Straße noch gesperrt ist?

Eine temporäre Baustelle ist besser mittels (als Beispiel)

access:conditional 	= no @ (2019 Jul 01-2019 Nov 30)

zu mappen, als gleich mit access=no die Straße auf unbestimmte Zeit zu sperren. Wer weiß, wann die Nutzer mal wieder ein Updade auf ihrem Navi aufspielen?

Viele Grüße
Toni
LuisLoser (2019-11-13 12:40:27+00:00): Hi Toni,
danke fuer den Review.
Die Strasse wird teilweise Mitte Dezember geoeffnet, der Teil mit Bachtunnelung wird erst naechstes Jahr (Feb?) geoeffnet werden.
Zunaechst hatte ich die Strasse als "under construction" aber das war noch schlechter.
Wo geben ich den Zeitrahmen (wie in Deinem Vorschlag) ein? 
Sorry -- bin noch nicht lange dabei...

Gruss
Luis
LuisLoser (2019-11-13 12:49:27+00:00): Ah .. einfach in das Feld dahinter schreiben...
Hab das jetzt mal gemacht, Hoffe, dass es so besser ist.
ToniE (2019-11-13 13:13:25+00:00): Hallo Luis,

... jeder hat mal als Anfänger angefangen und im Laufe der Zeit dazu gelernt.

Ich habe ein paar kleinere Korrekturen gemacht:

access:conditional statt access

no @ (...) statt no (...)

die beiden Teilstücke innerhalb des Ortes habe ich wieder auf highway=residential (statt unclassified) gemapped.

BTW: ich bin im Sommer mal von Ebersberg nach Grafing hier lang gekommen um die Buslinie 442 zu checken. Dabei bin ich dann von Norden her kommend von der Wasserburger Straße auf die EBE 8 abgebogen. Damals war das noch möglich, nur gerade aus gings halt nicht. 
Das Stück mit der Bachtunnelung scheint nun auch gesperrt zu sein.

Viele Grüße und viel Spass noch.
Toni
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471561 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:50:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471575 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471576 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:51:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471580 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471584 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471586 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:51:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471594 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471595 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471597 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:52:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471602 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:52:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471605 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:52:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471607 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471615 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471618 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471622 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
Denis_Helfer (2022-12-26 17:11:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Les landuse collés aux réseaux (routier, ferroviaires,...) c'est un enfer. C'est 
sponsorisé par Satan ! 
Merci d'arrêter ; c'est décourageant de passer derrière tellement il y a de nettoyage à faire.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471623 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
Skinfaxi (2019-11-25 15:25:14+00:00): varför har Du ändrad natural_scree i natural_scrub? Jag har bara sätt på lm kartan att det är skogsbeklädd berg i dagen och fick därifrån gränserna.
archie (2019-11-25 15:44:21+00:00): Det var i samband med att jag rättade ett geometrifel (som OSMi visade) som du förorsakat. Satellitfotona gav inte vid handen att landcover där var scree. Scree är ju en helt annan sak (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscree) än vad det enligt nyss nämnda källa verkar vara frågan om.
Skinfaxi (2019-11-25 15:58:19+00:00): jag var där för några veckor sen vid hunden och besluade att helt raderar den. Om Du inte har andra källor än jag (LM och lite halvdant minne av ett hundpromenad) bör det ju vara okay.
archie (2019-11-25 16:17:14+00:00): ... med hunden. ... en hundpromenad. Har du raderat hunden? Det var illa i så fall.  Den naturtypen du beskrev i din första kommentar "skogsklädd berg" (sic) stämmer inte överens med din ursprungliga taggning, dvs "natural=scree".
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471624 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471625 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471629 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471630 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:53:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471633 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471634 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471636 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471710 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 00:00:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471734 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:10:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77472913 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471644 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471711 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77472931 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471649 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471712 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77472946 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471650 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471715 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77472968 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471654 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471716 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77472987 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471655 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471718 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473008 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471657 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-23 23:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77471719 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 02:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473030 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
A67-A67 (2019-11-13 12:29:46+00:00): The admin_level is correct. Level 2 is used for the entire sovereign country (Kingdom of the Netherlands), level 3 is used for the constituent countries (Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten). So this is the relation of a constituent country and therefore level 3.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
Arun Madhavan (2019-11-16 03:27:02+00:00): hi, one of the road you drew was already existing. Pls dont draw over an existing road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77003582
eggie (2019-11-13 10:53:23+00:00): Oke.. weg is weg.. Wanneer het nieuwe gebouw er in werkelijkheid is kun je de nieuwbouw laten importeren middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM. (draadje Verzoek BAG import) Inlog identiek aan osm account. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

In de BAG viewer is het nieuwe gebouw al aanwezig.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=bosstraat%201,%20drie&resultOffset=0&objectId=1581100000044206&geometry.x=147704.55799573&geometry.y=451650.45999851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1581010000050197

Doe je het zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-13 10:54:25+00:00): De adresnode nr 1 heb je wel verwijderd, maar die hoort denk ik op de kazerne zelf?
eggie (2019-11-13 10:58:14+00:00): herstel... Achterhaald inmiddels door het Kadaster..
Resultaat (1 huidige adressen)
Bosstraat 1 Driebergen-Rijsenburg (historisch)
Gijsbert Voskamp (2019-11-13 11:00:50+00:00): nee, kazerne is nr. 3
eggie (2019-11-13 11:42:25+00:00): Klopt.. Heb het gebouw even uitgelijnd met de Kadasterdata. (BGT omtrekfericht)
Beter niet naar de dakranden kijken.
highflyer74 (2019-11-15 10:01:38+00:00): CS Reverted.

Again: Please stop doing what you did here. You imported data with not a single OSM tag attached to it over a wide area. This is not the way OSM works. Please make yourself familiar with OSM before continuing to map.

You can ask for help e.g. in the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ and read other documentation in the Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Thank you!
-------------------

Encore une fois: S'il vous plaît, arrêtez de faire ce que vous avez fait ici. Vous avez importé des données sans qu'aucune balise OSM ne lui soit attachée sur une vaste zone. Ce n'est pas ainsi que fonctionne l'OSM. Familiarisez-vous avec l'OSM avant de continuer à cartographier.

Vous pouvez demander de l'aide, par exemple sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ et lire d'autres documents dans le Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Je vous remercie !
skfd (2019-11-13 11:28:15+00:00): мне кажется тут какой-то выброс получился. дорога шла вдол жд а теперь где-то в лесу идёт
mueschel (2019-11-16 11:14:10+00:00): Hi,
I found 239 buildings with tags like
дом=26
улица=Строительная
Could you fix these? I guess it should be
addr:housenumber
addr:street

Thanks!