piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
kadiwa (2025-03-30 18:11:11+00:00): Der Laden war bereits eingetragen: https://osm.org/node/9919046701
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:13:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested
Please pay attention to next points:
You tagged highway=residential in a rural area, just as access to a few buildings.  See this wiki how to tag them correctly. (unclassified)
You also tagged a track as path, despite you can see wheel traces which indicate it can be driven by 4-wheel cars.
Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126850482
L'imaginaire (2022-10-01 17:55:12+00:00): Bedankt voor de aanvullingen. Het is daar een verschrikkelijke soep ...
s8evq (2022-10-05 06:37:23+00:00): Ik zag de tekst in je note en ben akkoord, het is daar heel ingewikkeld. Een iets JanFi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521930508 waarom zou het stukje langs de Nijverheidslaan oneway=yes zijn? Heb ik ergens een bordje gemist?  Bijvoorbeeld hier zie je dat er twee pijlen op de grond staan, in beide richtingen: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=322099695987400 Wat denk je JanFi?
JanFi (2022-10-05 18:03:31+00:00): Pijlen op de grond zijn niet bindend. De foto die je toont laat zien dat er geen fietspadbordje in de tegenrichting staat, alleen in de meerichting. Dus eenrichtingsverkeer. Toegegeven: heel de industriezone is zo'n ramp dat dat niet bewijst dat eenrichting de bedoeling was, maar toch. Verderop staat helemaal geen bord: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=265223215133820&lat=51.104121630016&lng=3.4415817000045&z=17&focus=photo .
Frans S (2022-10-01 09:15:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
you mapped a few pieces of a highway as being a building.  Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126850742
Frans S (2022-10-01 09:01:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, in some cases you mapped a building oversized, by included a clearing next to a building.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126850819
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:58:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not always accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126850910
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-30 16:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146871233 where the changeset comment is: aufräumen hinter alter beautifulplaces-sockenpuppe
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-30 16:42:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146871233 where the changeset comment is: aufräumen hinter alter beautifulplaces-sockenpuppe
eggie (2022-10-01 09:25:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-01 09:27:11+00:00): Tip...  Probeer gebruik te maken van de bestaande adresnodes.
Je hoeft niet altijd adressen aan te maken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-01 09:28:29+00:00): Museum de Roos staat al op de kaart.
Die info zou dus allemaal naar de adresnode kunnen.
Kijk je nog even?
gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-01 09:39:24+00:00): Alle info van de Roos staat nu op de adresnode... Gebouw heb ik leeggehaald van info.
eggie (2022-10-01 09:43:18+00:00): De Bieb samengevoegd met de adresnode.. Postcode geen spatie svp.
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-01 09:50:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DeFra85 (2022-12-07 09:39:29+00:00): Hej hej, der Wegweiser https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10066362822 sollte laut Plan auch eine Standortplakette haben (BI063).
Vielleicht wurde die auch demoliert wie eines der "Fähnchen"?

Hattest du den Vandalismus dem Umweltamt (Frau Wünscher) gemeldet?
Muhmaker (2022-12-07 11:34:53+00:00): Hi. Nein bei Wander-Wegweisern habe ich bisher keine Schadensmeldungen gemacht. Die Ansprechpartner waren/sind ja nicht so offensichtlich zu finden. Bei den Radwegweisern ist das einfacher umgesetzt. Dort gibt es ein zentrales Portal (https://www.radverkehrsnetz.nrw.de/rvn_schaden.asp). Die Dauer der Bearbeitung variiert aber dann stark je nach Kommune. Ich würde hier die Erwartungen an eine Reparatur nicht zu hoch ansetzten. Speziell wenn neue Teile der Schilder angefertigt werden müssen. Und etwas off-topic aber passt hier zu der Region: Als ich im August den Weg Naturzeitreise 2 gegangen bin war der nördliche Abschnitt zwischen Windfang und Bodelschwinghstraße wegen mehreren umgestürzten Bäumen und massiver Zuwucherung nicht zu nutzen. War bisher zu faul den passenden Ansprechpartner rauszufinden ;) Du hattest ja mal angedeutet, dass du Connections in die Wander-Gremien hier in der Region hast. Vielleicht kannst du das ja weiterleiten.
DeFra85 (2022-12-08 20:55:55+00:00): Die Ansprechpartner stehen ja in den einzelnen örtlichen Relation für die Wegweiser ;-)
Ja, das mit der Schadensmeldung bei den Fahrradwegweisern ist eindeutig besser gelöst worden. 
Aber das meine ich auch letzten gesehen zu haben, als ich in der Ecke um Rheine, Hörstel unterwegs war.

Ich werde die anderen Schäden dann auch mal melden
Muhmaker (2022-12-09 08:06:07+00:00): Danke dass du dich darum kümmerst. Die Infos in den Relationen sind für den Moment sicher auch hilfreich dafür. Allerdings auch nur für wanderinteressierte aktive OSM-ler. 
Außerdem sehe ich die Gefahr, dass die Infos zu den Ansprechpartnern auf längere Sicht veralten werden, selbst wenn du momentan die besten Absichten hast, die Infos zu pflegen.
DeFra85 (2022-12-10 23:17:07+00:00): Ja, das mit der Aktualität ist immer ein Problem. Aber zumindest hat man eine ungefähre Ahnung wo man nachfragen könnte wenn Links und Personen nicht mehr existieren
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 12:03:37+00:00): Hi zitta,

durch die Änderungen in diesem Changeset wurden z.B. aus mehreren gemappten Reihenhäusern ein Haus gemacht. Vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250834150

Ist diese weniger detaillierte Option durch das Tagging nicht in diesem Fall hier eher zu vermeiden? Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dterrace

Danke & Grüße
Pascal
zitta (2022-11-03 10:04:11+00:00): Hallo Pascal

Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, bilden diese Reihenhäuser einen gemeinsamen Baukörper. Die Option, diesen Baukörper aus mehreren einzeln definierten Häusern zu bilden, sehe ich als weniger zutreffend an. Dies würde individuelle, unabhängige Häuser voraussetzen, die nur 'zufällig' eine gemeinsame Wand haben. 

Das englische Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace ist da etwas ausführlicher und empfiehlt diese Option nur 
 for cases where it is clearly several independent buildings that happen to share walls, but may have been built at different times, by different builders, with different styles, etc,

Grüße
JuanjoMC (2022-10-01 11:51:54+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset you changed the name name of the street from 'Van Der Nootstraat' to 'Van der Nootstraat'

May I ask you what is your information source here? 

I ask because in AIV Flanders GRB the street is named 'Van Der Nootstraat'

Cheers
bxl-forever (2022-10-01 15:09:37+00:00): Hello,

I think the change is legit, because the street seems to be named after Henrik Van der Noot, who served as Prime Minister of the first version of Belgium (1790) after a short-lived revolution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Van_der_Noot

I didn’t know he lived or died in this area, so this is very likely they named a street here after him.

Wikipedia articles in various languages seem to agree about "der"; however "Van" or "van" are used interchangeably → I suspect "van der Nootstraat" is the correct spelling anyway.

For discrepancies with GRB (or more exactly, CRAB) data, we usually add "official_name=Van Der Nootstraat" on the street. ;-)
ebruxelles (2022-10-02 06:24:57+00:00): Hello,

As bxl-forever points out, most websites, including Wikipedia and Wikidata, spell his name as Van der Noot. By the way, the adjacent park, as well as the house where he lived were allready spelled that way.

Regards
JuanjoMC (2022-10-02 12:11:03+00:00): Thank you both for your comments.

As suggested, I added the official_name tag and, in passing, also added name:etymology:wikidata and wikipedia tags to make it clear where the name in coming from.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126890787

@bxl-forever
I guess that the addr:street tags should stick to the official name, right?

Cheers
bxl-forever (2022-10-02 12:45:04+00:00): Thanks, the fix is perfect.

@JuanjoMC
In fact, "addr:street" should match the "name" tag of the street, otherwise we get validation warnings here.  Don’t worry, I’ve just fixed this too.  (And since most search engines are case insensitive it won’t make any difference anyway.)
eggie (2022-10-01 09:54:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Wanneer het een woonerf is dan is de maxspeed 15  Ik heb het aangepast. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-01 10:07:17+00:00): ... en mocht het geen bebord woonerf zijn dan uiteraard highway=resiential...  en dan geldt de maxspeed zoals op de aansluitende wegen. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
lumacraft (2022-10-01 09:41:57+00:00): Ce changeset est une erreur. Je croyais d'avoir modifier la relation de Maastricht-Centrum. Est-il possible d'annuler ce changeset, svp ? Je vous remercie d'avance.
LockOnGuy (2022-10-01 18:19:34+00:00): Hi s@jj@d, the roads you edited were correct the way it was before, the sat images are not updated yet.         
Please if you see the roads are aligned and straight and the one in the sat image is not paved that means the sat image is old and the residential area is paved now and has straight roads.             
Please do not assume what a road should look like, please consider contacting local mappers you see who edit in the subject areas for local knowledge.              
Also please use a good changeset comment next time. You should've explained to the mappers what you edit and why, so mappers can understand and know what your edit is. Having only "edit" is unclear and doesn't help.
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments         
I will revert your edits back to the correct way of roads.      
Regards.
W3NET0wns (2022-10-01 10:06:35+00:00): Nie rozumiem tej zmiany. Kondratowicza nie została otwarta na tym odcinku który ty "otworzyłeś" a autobusy oraz inne pojazdy kołowe po niej nie jeżdżą, nawet infrastruktura piesza nie została oddana do użytku.
NieWnen (2022-10-01 10:30:17+00:00): Wycofałem obie zmiany.
Takich rzeczy w OSM nie robimy!

To już drugie takie konto (poprzednie/inne: lapibek191). Problem leży po Twojej/Waszej stronie.  

Społeczność OSM jest otwarta na udzielenie porad/pomocy (zapraszam na forum), a do tej pory wątku w tym temacie (generowania tras) nie widziałem.

Edytując wbrew zasadom i tworzenie fikcji na potrzeby jakiegoś zewnętrznego oprogramowania na pewno sobie i innym nie pomagasz, a takie zmiany będą wycofywane, bo są zwyczajnie traktowane jako wandalizm.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
Dawid2849 (2022-10-07 07:49:54+00:00): Czemu podniosłeś kategorię tej drogi? Nie tak dawno temu została ona obniżona do secondary po dyskusji na forum.
Dawid2849 (2022-10-29 19:58:44+00:00): Wycofane.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-01 18:14:19+00:00): Sutvarkiau pastatą.
Vaidotas (2022-10-01 18:26:45+00:00): Ačiū.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Self-Perfection (2026-05-28 17:22:02+00:00): Hi!

Do you still think that barrier=kerb should be used for the cathedral outline e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099622911 ? Seems incorrect to me.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-01 14:35:36+00:00): Hello, Please stop mapping complete blocks of buildings and map them individually.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
See my previous comment on your mappings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126855566
Famlam (2022-10-01 21:37:39+00:00): Ik heb de Zaligebrug ook meegenomen omdat die bij dezelfde afsluiting hoorde ( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126873500 ), mocht dat niet kloppen, hoor ik het graag: ik heb deze enkel aangenomen, niet geverifieerd
user_5359 (2022-10-03 09:40:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/183609491. what is the meaning of the tag e6bbd986-6667-11e3-a7ff-01f464e0362d = e597ab8e-6667-11e3-a7ff-01f464e0362d ?
Denis_Helfer (2022-10-04 16:00:52+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the revue. It's a mistake. The correct key is ref:FR:SNCF_Reseau:GAIA. An internal key pour opendata dataset SNCF Reseau.
Lokai (2022-10-01 14:38:11+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du nähere Angaben machen bitte. Ist der aufgegeben, etc.

Siehe auch hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:military%3Dbunker

Schau dich in der Umgebung um, dort wurden einige Bunker kartiert.

Gruß

L.
Frans S (2022-10-06 13:19:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accordingly.
Just a remark. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. 6 out of 15 were not squared.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126856127