piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ars-UA (2016-02-25 15:10:51+00:00): edward17, вообще не сходятся его почты, ни эта, №1, ни вторая, №17.
http://www.postindex.com.ua/city/12334/
Удалю, наверно.
Ars-UA (2016-02-25 15:16:01+00:00): А, НОВАЯ почта, не старая. Новая №1 метров на 100 правее, она переехала? Gross92map, вам вопрос.
Ars-UA (2016-02-25 15:21:45+00:00): Я сам добавлю, не трогайте пока такие сложные метки, там очень много информации:
amenity=post_office
branch=Маріуполь. Відділення №1
collection_times=Mo-Sa 15:30
contact:phone=+380 629 452 510
contact:website=http://novaposhta.ua
description:ru=Отделение №1: бульв. Шевченко, 313 (22-й м-рн)
description=Відділення №1: бульв. Шевченка, 313 (22-й м-рн)
name:en=Nova Poshta 1
name:ru=Новая Почта №1
name:uk=Нова Пошта №1
name=Нова Пошта №1
opening_hours=Mo-Fr 09:00-20:00; Sa 09:00-17:00
operator:en=Nova Poshta
operator:ru=Новая Почта
operator:uk=Нова Пошта
operator=Нова Пошта
ref=1
website=http://novaposhta.ua/office/view/id/1/city/Маріуполь
edward17 (2016-02-25 16:31:36+00:00): Мда, положение добавленных точек действительно не совпадает с информацией на официальном сайте:

* https://novaposhta.ua/office/view/id/1/city/Маріуполь
* https://novaposhta.ua/office/view/id/17/city/Маріуполь

И ещё по поводу тегов. Ars-UA, я считаю, что тег website=* не нужно добавлять. Во-первых, если уж и добавлять его, то его значение должно совпадать со значением тега contact:website=*, потому что эти два тега обозначают одно и то же. Во-вторых, где-то на форуме (уже не найду ссылку) договорились, что в веб-сайте для сетей POI (банки, супермаркеты, почта и т. д.) указываем только домен (например, "http://novaposhta.ua/", "http://www.atbmarket.com/"). Причина - путь до страницы конкретного магазина/отделения на сайте может поменяться. Например, у той же Новой Почты раньше были ссылки в формате "https://novaposhta.ua/map/warehouse?id=10152", и почти у всех отделений по Украине, внесённых в OSM, они такими  и остались. Хотя давно уже ведут на "404 Not Found".

Я заполняю теги для отделений Новой Почты как здесь: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2764739887
Ars-UA (2016-02-25 17:00:45+00:00): Edward17, Новую Почту в Мариуполе добавлял не я, только подправил кое-где. Добавил только отделение №13, везде сайты есть, ну и туда всунул. А так я ими вообще не заморачиваюсь) Остальные Новые Почты добавлю вообще с минимумом инфы, пусть работники почты и правят, это ж типа рекламная инфа.
alphensebezorger (2016-03-27 13:36:36+00:00): Zo te zien is in deze changeset de adres-node van Rode Beuk 46 (per ongeluk?) verschoven. Moet die niet terug?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823460866
d1g (2016-03-04 19:34:39+00:00): We overlooked this one, thank you!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2993482751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/343237278
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-02-28 10:59:58+00:00): Forma "3-go Maja" jest błędna. Powinno być "3 Maja", "11 Listopada" itd.
LatarnikCyfrowy (2016-02-28 18:40:39+00:00): Witam,

nazwa jest przepisana z bazy teryt. tam figuruje 3-go maja - kod ulicy 29830 	ul. 3-go Maja
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-02-28 18:58:32+00:00): W OSM nie odwzorujemy bazy TERYT.
LatarnikCyfrowy (2016-02-28 20:01:46+00:00): Witam,ok rozumię. Bazowałem na bazie  TERYT nanosząc koordynaty ulic. Ciąg dalszy ulic dla tej miejscowości w tym roku jeszcze będzie
sorcrosc (2016-02-25 18:11:55+00:00): Attenzione alle intersezioni tra le strade. Ti capita spesso di lasciare nodi doppi. Vedi qui per esempio:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=43.73610&mlon=12.97043#map=19/43.73610/12.97043&layers=N
user_5359 (2016-02-25 19:26:32+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
user_870861 (2016-02-28 14:29:11+00:00): hi,
i've fix duplicated geometry and tags from this changeset.
For the next time, you can do it yourself with josm's validator

Detected errors can be see at this url :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=cameroon&item=1230
mavl (2016-02-25 17:44:36+00:00): Hello.  
  
Your changeset comment is "name:ja of cities", but you added this tag for any objects.  
Exemple [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1388277220]. Mass adding tags is not good practice. Please, check every object.  
  
Happy mapping.
naoliv (2016-02-25 15:53:49+00:00): Robson, não grude as áreas nas ruas. Isso não é correto.
Desenhe os prédios e outras áreas apenas no local onde se encontram, sem conectá-los nas ruas.
Hjart (2016-02-25 14:55:05+00:00): Denne her sti er vist heller ikke beregnet til almindelige cykler
mstock (2016-09-26 13:58:50+00:00): Hallo xraysalami,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in diesem Aenderungssatz beim Hof 'Waldegg' wahrscheinlich  versehentlich den Namen auf 'WaldeggBei Fahrtantritt habe er sich „wie nach einer Auseinandersetzung mit Klitschko“ gefühlt.' gesetzt hast. Das hat unterdessen jemand anderes repariert, aber ich habe gerade noch zwei weitere, ganz aehnliche Fehler von dir korrigiert [1,2] (wo's nicht im 'name'-Tag und daher etwas subtiler war). Ich weiss nicht, wie dir das passiert ist, ich vermute, es war eine Art Copy-Paste-Fehler, Drei Instanzen dieses Fehlers sind mittlerweile korrigiert, da musst du also nichts mehr machen, aber in Zukunft vielleicht etwas besser aufpassen, schliesslich koennten da auch mal Informationen dabei sein, die du nicht  im Internet veroeffentlichen willst ;).

Gruss
mstock

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42444967
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42445345
Nakaner (2016-03-16 14:40:34+00:00): Bitte beachte meinen Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37868660, bevor du weiter light_rail=yes an Gleisen ergänzst.
kreuzschnabel (2017-03-21 16:06:52+00:00): IMHO tourism=country_park would fit best. Not an official value yet :-) AFAIS, one cannot place one’s campervan there, nor pitch one’s tent, so i’d hardly call it a camp site. They let chalets.
Spearmint (2017-03-21 16:29:01+00:00): Changed, happy enough with your choice
mapper999 (2016-02-26 19:43:06+00:00): Hallo mappy123,
in diesem Changeset sind leider einige Zäune verschwunden. Es ist meiner Meinung nach keine gute Idee, Linien- und Flächenelemente an den gleichen Way zu kleben, nur damit JOSM keine Warnung mehr anzeigt.
mappy123 (2016-02-28 11:47:54+00:00): Hi, wie du selber schreibst sind sie nicht verschwunden, sondern nur richtig gemappt. Wenn du mit dem Rendern auf der Karte nicht einverstanden bist würde ich einen Bug-Report an den Renderer vorschlagen. Ansonsten kann ich deiner Notiz leider nicht entnehmen warum das keine gute Idee ist. Es gibt m.E. nichts schlimmeres als doppelte Linien, da man diese übersieht und sich so noch mehr Fehler einschleichen. Vor lauter Fehlern sieht man dann manchmal den Wald vor lauter Bäumen nicht mehr. Noch schlimmer als das ist nur noch Mircomapping wo Leute um jeden Baum ein Landuse=forest zeichnen. So eine Karte wird unwartbar.
mapper999 (2016-03-08 19:16:09+00:00): Hi,
das Problem ist kein Renderer-Problem, sondern ein Datenproblem. Wenn Zäune, Landuse und Unternehmensdaten am gleichen Objekt kleben, woher soll ein Datenauswerter wissen, welche Tags zu welchem Objekt gehören? Er kann nur raten und das geht ziemlich oft schief (siehe die vielen Gebäude, die Namen von Arztpraxen, Büros etc. tragen). Noch schlimmer ist das wenn Flächen- und Linienelemente vermischt werden. Woher soll ein Renderer wissen, ob es sich um einen linienförmigen oder einen flächigen Zaun/Hecke/Mauer handelt?
Daher bin ich zu der Erkenntnis gekommen, dass man verschiedene Objekte nicht an das selbe OSM-Objekt taggen sollte. Doppelte Linien lassen sich nun mal nicht vermeiden (z.B. aneinander angrenzende Landuse, Gebäude, Indoor, 3D etc.). Der einzige Weg um doppelte Linien komplett zu vermeiden sind Multipolygons und diese sind wohl in der Wartung und Pflege noch fehleranfälliger.
GerdP (2016-02-26 08:17:08+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed your changes because you use
highway=crossing instead of highway=footway + footway=crossing . 
The tag highway=crossing should be used for the node that is shared by the major road and the footway. 

A 2nd problem: You add trailing blanks to keys or values, this is not good as these blanks are not ignored by OSM.
Please check my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37454229
Happy mapping !
trigpoint (2016-02-25 17:34:54+00:00): Hi
Rather than adding names to the pitches, it is better to tag them as leisure=pitch sport=soccer, sport=rugby_union etc.
The name tag is intended if they have a verifiable name, rather than as a description.

Cheers Phil
HTH
Владимир К (2016-02-26 14:28:36+00:00): Повзольте поинетерсоваться, что вы делаете? Что это за треугольники из дорог? Что за дорожки с названиями в одну букву в лесу? Если не потрудитесь объяснить, начну сносить всё это подряд
PT-53 (2017-11-12 08:31:56+00:00): Hallo Gerold,
in keep right wird dieser Hinweis "fehlende Tags, Node 2733804821" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81140859
Was ist eine Warnglocke ?
PT-53 (2017-11-12 08:32:36+00:00): Betrifft Knoten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2733804821#map=15/47.7672/9.4494
Gerold (2017-11-12 18:52:01+00:00): http://www.warnglocke.de/wer-sind-wir/

Und nur weil Du das vermutlich übersehen hast: Ich hab das Ding nicht angelegt, ich hab's nur auf die passende Position verschoben.

P.S.
Du brauchst niemanden auf KeepRight-Einträge verweisen.
Diejenigen die's kümmert kennen das schon.
PT-53 (2017-11-13 09:15:06+00:00): O.K. ich habe übersehen, daß die Warnglocke von einem anderen Mapper eingetragen worden war. Aber warum verschiebst Du nur den POI und trägst die fehlenden Attribute nicht ein ?
Robert Whittaker (2017-05-01 17:49:36+00:00): Can I ask what your source is for the postcode you added to Nattor Farm in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400009733 and if you're sure it's correct?

According to Code-Point Open, the centroid for PL20 6PG lies about 15km away, close to a hamlet called Nattor (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330256644). I wonder if there is another Nattor Farm there, and you've got the two mixed up.
John Grubb (2017-05-05 08:55:06+00:00): Good spot! Yes, I picked up the address for Nattor Farm, Yelverton, when this one is Nattor Farm, Peter Tavy. Doh! More haste, less speed...! Corrected now.
upperoso (2016-02-25 23:17:45+00:00): The Edelweißstraße edit appears to be a hoax.
Nakaner (2016-02-29 21:44:53+00:00): Ich glaube, dein "local knowledge" ist fehlerhaft oder du hast dich im Signaltagging geirrt. Auf meinem Video kann ich kein Lf 7 [90] am Signal 5N1 erkennen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4026439127/history

Das Signal hat aber ein Zs3-Lichtsignal und kurz davor steht ein Lf 7 [110], diese trägt jedoch eine Zuordnungstafel. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gafx_Bhe3EeMtVaOgnOAQQ/photo bzw. https://twitter.com/Nakaner/status/704420246925533184
Nakaner (2016-02-29 21:49:07+00:00): Dass es die Nummer 5N1 hat, bezweifle ich ebenfalls. Mein unscharfes Foto lässt mich eher an "51N1" glauben, was auch zum restlichen Bahnhof passen würde. Die Nummer habe ich gerade eben korrigiert.
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 11:06:15+00:00): Way 400014366 looks very small to be a dog park. Wouldn't this rather be a dog toilet?
Allroads (2016-03-10 09:51:41+00:00): HINT: Koudhoornweg en Meenthorstweg hoge valkseweg, ruitenbeekweg, lijken mij toch echt een bridge en geen culvert.
Hoe zie ik dat zo snel, gebruik deze link, http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eQd  , welk ook in forum stond, groot gebied nemen, uitvoeren drukken, josm aanzetten, en exporteren, zo weet je waar je moet kijken, met bing in josm eronder zie ik zo dat het een bridge is, die op de highway moet. culvert van de waterway af. Succes.
RijkPloeg (2016-03-10 11:16:29+00:00): Thnx, Ja dat is me bekend, drie ervan waren tot twee jaar geleden nog afgesloten voor vrachtverkeer, ze waren te zwak geworden.
user_5359 (2016-02-25 19:06:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Gebäude bitte mit building=yes kennzeichnete, damit Sie in der Karte auftauchen.
narceliodesa (2016-02-25 20:30:22+00:00): Klauber , verificar a utilização de nomes em Caixa Alta. Os nomes das feições (logradouros,etc) não devem ser cadastrados usando apenas letras maiúsculas. Evite também as utilização de siglas , com  'Rua DR. Fulano de Tal' prefira utilizar o nome completo Rua Doutor Fulano de Tal'

Abraço
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-22 00:19:43+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2197189 ? Coś skopane jest
B_KSL (2022-02-23 17:32:47+00:00): kolega wmyrda raczej nie odpowie, nie żyje od paru lat
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-23 18:52:57+00:00): aj, nie wiedziałem

dzięki za informacje
Hjart (2016-02-25 20:02:24+00:00): Umiddelbart ville jeg synes det var en god ide at lede cykle udenom
Bo Pretzmann (2016-02-26 05:59:07+00:00): Det kan vi godt blive enige om. Men da det ikke er ulovligt for cyklister at køre igennem den, så mener jeg ikke at cyklist settings skal være sat til "no"
dgitto (2016-06-07 19:57:21+00:00): amenity=hospital, name=farmacia? che vuol dire?
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
aboges26 (2016-02-26 17:12:48+00:00): #GEOG4320 #TTU #youthmappers
SomeoneElse (2016-02-26 20:39:15+00:00): Any chance of translating those hashtags into a human-readable language?  :)
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
sabas88 (2016-02-26 07:48:47+00:00): Cos'è Saturnia S.A.S?
Manca il tag principale..
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
DD1GJ (2016-02-25 21:16:07+00:00): Hören Sie bitte sofort mit den unsachgemäßen Eintragungen auf! Arbeiten Sie für Direktwerbung Bayern?
AURELIO DANILO (2016-02-25 21:11:28+00:00): A nota foi criada por mim Aurélio, Ah aproveitando, o contorno ficou ligado a rotatoria ( uma pista do retorno e quem esta nele pode entrar na rotatória tbem
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
Alecs01 (2016-02-25 21:19:27+00:00): perchè continui sempre a cancellare? ora sono queste tre stradine secondarie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266575573/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266575569/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266575571/history non lo capisci che è considerato vandalismo cancellare oggetti esistenti?
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
Piskvor (2016-02-26 09:28:45+00:00): What exactly is "way too big" here? Also, I don't understand what the way is supposed to connect, and to where.
Piskvor (2016-02-29 12:47:54+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37520925 - deleted nonexistent way.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
Alecs01 (2016-02-25 21:28:26+00:00): qua c'era un landuse con un nome (disegnato da te!) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329873848/history ora il nome si è perso, hai cancellato altri due landuse per rifarne uno più grande, quindi meno preciso; non è la tua mappa personale dove puoi fare e rifare a piacimento per favore
alphensebezorger (2016-03-15 18:51:58+00:00): Het273318198
Sander H (2016-03-15 18:56:39+00:00): ?
alphensebezorger (2016-03-15 18:58:28+00:00): Wat ik probeerde te typen: het gebouw http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273318198 staat (inmiddels?) in de BAG viewer op niet gerealiseerd. Die kan dus gewist? Dan blijft er zo te zien nog altijd een gemeentehuis over.
Sander H (2016-03-15 19:25:45+00:00): lagen inderdaad 2 bag panden op elkaar, heb er 1 verwijderd zodat het weer klopt met BAG
aboges26 (2016-02-26 17:12:39+00:00): #GEOG4320 #TTU #youthmappers
mindB (2016-02-29 15:51:06+00:00): Be careful with retracing roads in the area generally. The Bing imagery is slightly offset from stuff's actual position on the ground ~10 feet. Working on creating a good offset guideline for Parkersburg. Already have one for Marietta.
ZacRyDi (2016-02-29 16:07:09+00:00): I will keep that in mind. What usually happens is when I join nodes from to areas the road moves slightly and it registers as a modification, admitidly I have modified several on purpose because the ways do not connect with each other. 

I will try to start from modify them any further, and thank you for the advice and concern.
mindB (2016-03-02 20:20:50+00:00): Don't mean to come off as critical--this is just the kind of stuff that took me a while to figure out. If you wanted to work on an alignment for the data using your own gps traces, that would be awesome.
Durko_freemap (2016-07-04 08:43:14+00:00): Ahoj, tento bankomat by nemal byt SLSP?
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/309325117). Akoze nebol som tam, to len ze mi nesedi bankomat VUB na banke SLSP. Dik za odpoved. Durko
jurov (2016-07-09 12:46:17+00:00): Zrejme máš na mysli adresu 1. Mája 236/2. V budove nie je banka SLSP. Zo strany Námestie sv. Egídia je bankomat VÚB a zo strany 1. Mája je bankomat SLSP.
Durko_freemap (2016-07-11 05:30:16+00:00): Ahoj, vdaka za odpoved, mame bankomaty od VUB (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/VUBatm_bot/history#map=7/48.532/19.639) a tato adresa tam nefiguruje, tak preto som pochyboval. Zjavne sme nedostali vsetky. Durko
user_242798 (2016-03-08 14:18:06+00:00): OSM Inspector: Duplicate ways.

Ferry (Voetveer, name='Maria Johanna Petronella') has been duplicated by:
* highway=footway
* bridge=yes
* step_count=6

Deleted - duplicate - footway.
Geography Canada (2016-07-03 13:45:01+00:00): foot=permissive is definitely incorrect, this is a downtown walkway.