piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andygol (2019-09-10 16:30:40+00:00): Hey, Hjart.

May I explain what issues were here which rise my attention.

In this case you have two separate building structures: 

1) roof that cover area where drivers can fill the tank with fuel, and 

2) pay-n-go shop on the gas station. 

I fixed that issue by splitting them into two separate features. It was incorrect when they both had a common outline tagged with `layer=1`. It was like a building flying above the ground (and pay-n-go shop too). 

Another one was a building that overlapped the service road. I added tag `covered=yes` to the part of the road under the roof according to the articles in OSM wiki to fix this issue with the building overlapped road (<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=roof> and <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered#covered=yes>). You can't rely only on the validator in JOSM. There is a bunch of other QA/QC tools, for example, QA in iD shows that this is an issue when road under the roof doesn't have `covered=yes` tag. 

I understand that this is more time-consuming way of mapping of covered roads but I would appreciate if you adopt this way of tagging in your edits.

Have fun mapping time.

andygol

PS. also, area of the gas station was tagged as farm 🤷‍♂️
iWowik (2019-11-23 19:20:54+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте!
Я заметил, что вы ставите адресную информацию, а ее обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы берете номера домов?
zzptichka (2019-09-20 15:36:24+00:00): Hello,

I've noticed you mapped some bike lanes in Toronto. That's great and Toronto badly needs cycling infrastructure to be mapped.

The problem is that historically in OSM we are mapping painted bike lanes that are not physically separated from the road as a cycleway=lane tag on the road itself. See OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

In Ottawa we compiled a guide how to map various cycling infrastructure with Canadian specifics. Have a look: https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide
zzptichka (2019-09-20 15:37:44+00:00): Also when you map any footways/cycleways/pathway make sure you connect them to something. Otherwise they will be useless for routing.
ma-rt-in (2020-06-08 08:26:41+00:00): Hallo,
auf welche Grundlage hast du hier die Geschwindigkeit reduziert?
vg
ondatrik (2020-06-08 08:47:54+00:00): Hi,

I made the change based on a report of one of our customer who claimed that the maxspeed should be reduced there from 100 to 50 (it was his own local knowledge).

Best regards,
Robin
ma-rt-in (2020-06-08 09:28:53+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the info. Excuse me if I now ask again more exactly: Was the signposting normal or due to a construction site?
ondatrik (2020-06-08 13:20:02+00:00): I'm sorry but I don't know that. It is possible that it was based on some temporary restriction due to a road construction in which case the maxspeed is wrong now. Unfortunately, I don't have any means to find out what is the current situation there.

Best regards,
Robin
ma-rt-in (2020-06-08 13:44:28+00:00): Thanks for the info. I will put a note here with a link to these comments, because unfortunately I have no further local knowledge either.
Martin Borsje (2021-02-06 10:25:51+00:00): Beste Brian,
Ik zie dat je in Meppel aan het (detail)mappen bent geslagen. Vast ook op andere plaatsen. Mooi.
Een van de dingen die je gedaan hebt, is privéparkeerplaatsjes als amenity=parking gaan taggen. Vanaf bepaalde zoomfactoren worden zo woonwijken overspoeld met grote blauwe P's.
Is dat de bedoeling? Natuurlijk ook een deel een renderingsissue, maar...
Deze P's hebben natuurlijk geen enkele routeringsnut daar zij voor bewoners en hun bezoek zijn, dit in tegenstelling tot grotere (openbare) parkeerplaatsen.
Een aantal jaren geleden is in het forum over deze zaak eerder gediscussieerd nadat een mapper uit Steenwijk overal P's strooide. De consensus in het forum was dat deze vorm van µ-mapping niet bijdroeg en uiteindelijk is de mapper, die hier hardnekkig niet mee instemde, door de data workinggroup een ban opgelegd omdat hij tegen de consensus in bleef doorgaan.
Zie dit commentaar hier niet als een 'dreiging' in deze :), want alle bijdragen worden in principe gewaardeerd, maar vraag je serieus af wat het nut, OSM technisch, is om individuele parkeervakken te mappen.
Groet,
Martin
Dani CS (2019-09-13 13:22:15+00:00): Tags using the :xx suffix to indicate a language should be modified in agreement with the community who speaks such language.

The name used by speakers of Spanish for A Coruña is "La Coruña", and the name used by speakers of French for A Coruña is "La Corogne". These can be corroborated by the corresponding communities of speakers.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74315133
b-jazz (2019-09-10 20:52:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM @kepesk.

If you ever have any questions about mapping and want to talk to a local mapper, I'm in the area and would be happy to help.

Thanks for your contributions.
user_5359 (2019-09-10 16:23:20+00:00): Hello! Please check the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9894273. The role from and to are missing.
riysingh (2019-09-11 07:28:31+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error. I've corrected the relations under changeset #74339201.

Regards,
riysingh
drousseau (2019-12-09 13:38:00+00:00): Bonjour simgis,

En regardant autre chose, je vois "par hasard" que l'esplanade Nicole Fontaine, à Amiens, a retrouvé ses tracés "pré travaux BHNS".
Je vois que la source citée est notamment en image IGN & co, dont les dates sont évidemment antérieures aux travaux finalisés en en début 2019.
Les tracés que j'avais effectuées étaient très perfectibles, avec un relevé GPS, mais reflétaient la nouvelle organisation du carrefour.
simgis (2019-12-10 08:44:16+00:00): Bonjour drousseau, oui tàf c'est une erreur de ma part en voulant reprendre des tracés que je croyais incomplets voir obsolètes, à tort... Désolé pour cette perte, j'ai créé une note il y a 3 mois pour signaler ce manque et y revenir dès que possible. Bien à vous
user_5359 (2019-09-10 15:27:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't see any attempt that you have added a Facebook somewhere. If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2019-09-10 15:32:24+00:00): Short question, you have entered a level crossing at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/236320255/history, but I suspect that this node has not been drawn at the correct position for some time. Can you check this on site?
gileri (2019-09-24 20:35:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne fait pas du tout figure d'autorité, mais ça me semble bon. Je pense que la suggestion de changement de clé vient du fait que la "locale" (langue) de votre navigateur est en anglais américain.
az09 (2019-09-11 09:28:27+00:00): Поздравляю с 2К правок!
user_5359 (2019-09-10 15:50:12+00:00): Hello, Please check the access value of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723524008.
pillalp (2019-09-11 14:32:44+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the typo. We've corrected the access under changeset #74356793

Regards,
pillalp
Carnildo (2019-09-11 05:24:33+00:00): The pavement on these streets is brick.  I went there and looked.
viloan (2019-09-10 15:52:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
osm10005 (2019-09-11 00:16:22+00:00): this is not an government office POI, please change it to adress and in settings "name" to addr:housenumber. Please change all your pois, your poi type is wrong!
tux67 (2019-09-11 07:45:15+00:00): Hi, as you have edited / added on a wide spread area - could you please add the source of your knowledge (should be added each time when uploading a changeset).
BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74319072
bastisi (2019-09-11 20:56:28+00:00): Ich arbeite bei den Stadtwerken und komme deshalb gut rum und habe daher auch einen guten Überblick.
bastisi (2019-09-12 20:22:13+00:00): It‘s my Job. I know where water buildings are.
tux67 (2019-09-13 05:18:32+00:00): ok, danke für die Info ..
zuicz (2020-12-25 19:40:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2447138
Yunkers (2020-09-20 18:31:45+00:00): Hej,
Wiem, że sprawa jest dość stara, ale czy jesteś w stanie podać źródło dla przebiegu DW194 w Gnieźnie? https://wzdw.pl/files/drogi/Wykaz-dr%C3%B3g-wojew%C3%B3dzkich.pdf podaje, że ten fragment jest w administracji WZDW, ale nie ma oficjalnie numeru (194A jest numerem roboczym, nie jest oznaczony w terenie, i nie jest ujęty w rozporządzeniach GDDKia)
szalona_entropia (2020-09-22 17:00:01+00:00): Jedynym źródłem jest mapa na stronie WZDW
Yunkers (2020-09-23 19:23:52+00:00): Dzięki za info, wygląda na to, że "194A" jest obecnie osobną drogą, z oddzielnym pikietażem. Sprawdzę czy jest w ogóle potrzeba interweniowania :)
habi (2024-04-02 12:58:34+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it simply seems to add bogus data. See https://c.osm.org/t/111251

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149480220
viloan (2019-09-10 16:05:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-09-11 04:41:38+00:00): Hello! Please check the restriction relations 10024338, 9439083, 9894465, 9894466, 9894467, 9894468, 9894470, 9894471, 9894472. They have all errors!
shadty (2019-09-12 15:43:03+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the miss in relations. I've corrected the edit under changeset 74399396

Regards,
shadty
Sanniu (2019-10-07 11:09:57+00:00): Hi, it can't be both. OSM have rule of one node - one feature.
Now it's a building? So it should be tagged as building. 
Also height = 99999999999 looks strange.
user_11166885 (2020-05-17 09:29:36+00:00): Lo so che è presente una cippo in pietra che dice lungomare Regina Elena, ma credo che il percorso si trovi classificato con il nome di Viale Miramare. Chiedo un controllo ed un'ulteriore conferma.
viloan (2019-09-10 16:41:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-09-10 16:43:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_3022894 (2019-09-10 16:47:55+00:00): löst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1461978
user_11166885 (2020-07-30 13:34:47+00:00): Una ciclabile dalla Baia di Sistiana a Portopiccolo?
DiahW IRM-ED (2022-12-01 02:09:32+00:00): Hi, Gerardo Covarrubias, thank you for your mapping contribution!

Your edit looks awesome, but I need to delete the building due not exist on the imagery (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30233/task/142649862). If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.

Thank you
geow (2019-09-12 20:10:20+00:00): Hi Benni83, danke für deine Beiträge zu OSM!

Du hast hier einige Wege gelöscht, vgl. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74321757

Wie muss ich den CS-Kommentar "keine freigabe durch grundbesitzer" verstehen? Existieren die Steige nicht mehr, die du erst kürzlich selbst erfasst hast oder möchte der Grundbesitzer nicht, dass sie in OSM erscheinen? 

Danke für eine kurze Erläuterung.

Glückauf
geow
GeoTracking (2019-09-13 06:34:44+00:00): Hallo geow,

ja so ist es in der Tat, der Steig zur Maiwand existiert, der Grundbesitzer hat mich aber im Nachhinein wissen lassen, dass er eine Kartierung in OSM oder anderswo vorerst nicht wünscht. Dehalb die Löschung.

Ciao, Benni
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
rivermont (2019-09-10 23:59:25+00:00): This should not have included the change of n5451499824; that was intended to be separate.

Will have to be more careful using Osmose for editing...
frosm (2019-09-11 09:32:02+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
puis-je vous inviter à faire le tutoriel ? il vous ferra découvrir les bases pour que votre société soie correctement renseignée (en l’occurrence il manque l'attribut principal qui décrit ce que c'est).
bonne continuation
SLMapper (2020-07-15 21:16:49+00:00): Hi, der "Bahnhof Breitenholz" ist doch links bei "Steinel Recycling" und nicht hier am Trafoturm...
WayneSchlegel (2020-07-16 08:20:58+00:00): Genau, dort ist der ehemalige Bahnhof. Das von mir eingetragene "Bahnhof Breitenholz" ist die Trafoturmstation der Stadtwerke.
Den offiziellen Stationsnamen kannst du am Schild auf der Türe finden (ist bisschen mit Graffiti übermalt). Daher ist das von dir abgeänderte (in old_name) leider nicht korrekt.
SLMapper (2020-07-18 15:35:18+00:00): Ich war heute dort und es ist so mit Graffiti übermalt, dass nur noch "Breitenholz" und "[sw]t Tübingen" lesbar ist, sonst nichts mehr. Was da also tatsächlich steht ist nicht zu erkennen. Da der Turm aber auch nicht mehr als Bahnhof dient ist, old_name meiner Meinung nach das Richtige hier. Eigentlich war die Trafostation ja sogar noch nie ein Bahnhof, sondern lediglich "die Trafostation des Bahnhofs". Bilder von damal siehe http://www.ig-modell-schmalspur.de/Seiten/vorbild/gipswerk.html
Nakaner (2020-07-18 18:38:26+00:00): Hallo,

ich gebe mal meinen Senf dazu: Wenn der Turm noch als Trafoturm in Verwendung ist, ist name="Bahnhof Breitenholz" + die üblichen power-Tags für ihn schon richtig. Es gibt Dinge, die "Bahnhof/Friedhof/Kirche X" heißen, kein Bahnhof sind und trotzdem diesen Namen zu Recht tragen, z.B. Bushaltestellen. Kriegen die jetzt ein bustop_name="Bahnhof X"?

Viele Grüße

Michael
SLMapper (2020-07-19 18:13:38+00:00): Hallo, sorry ich stand auf der Leitung. Erst jetzt habe ich verstanden, dass WayneSchlegel bei "Station" nicht eine Bahnhofsstation, sondern die Trafostation meinte. Insofern wäre "name" korrekt, ja.
Ob die aber wirklich noch in use ist? Oberirdisch gibt es jedenfalls keine Kabel mehr. Ob es da noch eine andere Nutzung gibt, oder ob das überhaupt möglich ist, kenne ich mich nicht mit aus.
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
viloan (2019-09-10 17:21:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AdamPlayer (2019-12-06 15:03:20+00:00): The construction tag is used for when building a new roadway, as in there was no roadway there before. Marking it as construction makes it so it's closed for access as well. It is not used for when there is construction on the road, as in this case where it was getting repaved but is still open. The construction tag shouldn't be used for projects that are short term as well. Usually only projects lasting over a year should be tagged using it.
mvviveka (2019-12-10 12:08:54+00:00): Hi  Adam_P,
Thanks for your update. Apologies for the earnest mistake. I will definitely keep this in mind and work on it going forward. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.
Regards,
Mvviveka.
glglgl (2019-09-11 09:45:59+00:00): When splitting up a line, it would be better to consider all relations where it is member.

In JOSM, this is best ensured with Ctrl-Alt-D on that line and with downloading all missing members of all relations.
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mvexel (2019-09-10 19:39:08+00:00): Hey there, welcome to OSM! A couple of comments on your edits if I may,
First of all, it helps with reviewing if you keep your changes within one changeset geographically contained. Saving (uploading) more often helps with that.
Second, I noticed that you deleted the existing Rice Eccles stadium football pitch and replaced it with a new feature that lacked some of the information the old feature did have (lit=yes, surface=grass_paver) was this intentional? 
Thanks and happy mapping,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74323290
6bananza (2019-09-10 19:41:26+00:00): I noticed that the field was shaped inconsistently with how it appears on the map. I neglected to put the same tags back after changing the shape, I'll keep that in mind for the future.
Thanks!
mvexel (2019-09-10 19:42:26+00:00): Oh also, you removed the node for the Sandy Library, and the building containing that node does not have amenity=library, so according to OSM there was no longer a library there. I added amenity=library back to the building feature, but if this is incorrect, feel free to delete it again (i.e. if this is no longer a library)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74323290
YYYUUUIII (2023-10-07 08:59:19+00:00): 定期航線已取消
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
canfe (2021-05-25 13:51:48+00:00): Ma sulle palazzine è segnalo Carlo con vecchie targhe in marmo, Come fa ad essere Anselmo che dovrebbe essere un industriale dei filati?
morganvale (2021-05-25 19:40:02+00:00): È una ricerca che avevo fatto più di un anno fa, la memoria potrebbe ingannarmi. Mi pare di aver cercato conferma nell'archivio della sezione toponomastica del comume di torino. Comunque se non ricordo male sulle targhe in marmo è segnata solo come via Poma senza nome, almeno su quelle che ho visto di persona, potrei averne tralasciata qualcuna.
canfe (2021-05-26 04:26:26+00:00): Ci son due targhe in marmo sulle due palazzine in punta e al fondo.
Però la delibera dovrebbe prevalere.
C'è un link a quell'archivio che potrebbe servirmi anche per altro?
morganvale (2021-05-27 07:56:13+00:00): il link all'archivio delle intitolazioni toponomastiche è questo: http://www.comune.torino.it/statistica/intitolazioni/intitolazioni.htm
Però parte dal 2000 quindi questa via credo che non ci sia... Nei prossimi giorni passerò di persona sul posto per ricostruire la mia ricerca, non ricordo più purtroppo.
morganvale (2021-05-27 07:59:45+00:00): Guardando da Google maps si vede una targa metallica che indica la via come A. Poma (all'angolo con via Nallino). La mia ricerca nasce da lì.