piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pyrog (2023-03-17 10:35:31+00:00): Bonjour Martin,

Dans l'itinéraire de randonnée https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9314028

Les références contiennent plutôt des numéros.

Pour indiquer une couleur, tu peux utiliser le tag colour ou mieux, le tag osmc:symbol qui va indiquer le symbole, sa couleur,…

Pour website il faut si possible mettre la page de la randonnée.

website=https://audiablevert.com/ est trop générique

ici comme il n'y a pas une page par itinéraire, mettre :
website=https://audiablevert.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/sentierAuDiableVert.pdf

ou 

website=https://audiablevert.com/activites-estivales/randonnee-pedestre/

Cordialement

Yves (France)
Martin868 (2023-03-17 13:01:02+00:00): Selon le wiki pour le tag ref= Used for reference numbers or codes. Common for roads, highway exits, routes, entrances to big buildings etc.

La couleur est une forme de code communément utilisé pour marqué des itinéraires ou trajets de marche qui se composent de plusieurs sentiers, a tous le moins ici au Québec.   Dans ce cas le trajet rouge suit des sentiers. Les trajets d'autres couleurs suivent d'autres trajets mais utilisent en partie les même sentiers. Donc ce lieu utilise une couleur comme code de référence pour ses trajets, ou routes dans OSM.
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124249412 where the changeset comment is: revert blatant vandalism by Sussy Baka Amongus
eggie (2022-07-29 20:44:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Doe zulke wijzigingen bv in drie aparte uploads. Schuiven met de kaart levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-29 20:46:56+00:00): Je voegt oneway=yes toe in de Verhulststraat. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd. Dan oneway:bicycle=no toevoegen.
Is dat hier het geval?Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124246647

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-29 20:48:42+00:00): In het Larservaartbos plak je de wegen aan de grens van het natuurgebied. Beter niet doen. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar.
eggie (2022-07-29 20:55:28+00:00): afslagbeperking verwijderd. Die klopte niet. Probeer je te beperken in het begin. Dus niet een uur lang van alles gaan veranderen, want dan worden herstelactie heel lastig. 
Bij een revert ben je alle skwijt ook je nuttige toevoegingen.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-07-29 21:00:44+00:00): Ga niet zonder kennis objecten/betonning e.d.  uit de vaarkaart van onzinnige tagging voorzien. Graag behoudend mappen..  
De kaart wordt daadwerkelijk als vaarkaart gebruikt.
man_made pier??? 
boadt=yes 
area =yes  ???

Waar heb je dat allemaal opgezocht?
eggie (2022-07-29 21:04:45+00:00): Bij een parking altijd of het vlak.. of een node gebruiken. Dus niet beide...
Ik heb de node verwijderd. Een afslagbeperking is daar niet nodig.
eggie (2022-07-29 21:13:45+00:00): Welk bord staat er vooraan de Zeebiesweg.. Staat er art 461 wvs.. De weg zal niet routeren in OSM nu. Is dat de bedoeling?
MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124249412 where the changeset comment is: revert blatant vandalism by Sussy Baka Amongus
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124249412 where the changeset comment is: revert blatant vandalism by Sussy Baka Amongus
TheBestIdea (2022-08-01 18:02:34+00:00): Hey Daniel, 

Do you know if bikes are officially permitted on this ped overpass?  This streetsblog article indicates yes, but I can't find any photographic evidence of signs:

https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/07/25/eyes-on-the-street-new-kew-gardens-interchange-path-benefits-walkers-bikers/

Thanks!

Brandon
daniel_solow (2022-08-02 17:04:36+00:00): I was there and didn't see a sign offering clear guidance on that. I rode my bike through there and, for the most part, the path is wide enough to accomodate pedestrian and bicycle use. Will try to check again if I get a chance
daniel_solow (2022-08-02 17:11:40+00:00): Actually on the 29th (last Friday) I took a video from east side of the interchange approaching Kew Gardens. Only saw pedestrian signs and no bike signs. So from East to West, no bike signs are up
TheBestIdea (2022-08-03 19:02:53+00:00): Thanks for the info! I looked up a bunch of the construction documents, and they all refer to it as a "multi-use path" so hopefully bike signage is still to come.
BCNorwich (2022-07-30 07:06:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow duplicated this road placing a new highway atop of the existing one. I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-29 22:42:39+00:00): por favor, não coloque o nome do dono da casa como nome aqui neste projeto.
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124249412 where the changeset comment is: revert blatant vandalism by Sussy Baka Amongus
aixbrick (2022-07-30 20:02:37+00:00): Auch hier hast du mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494878038 wieder einen Weg gemappt, der so baulich getrennt nicht exisitiert und wo die Tags bereits an der Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120424462) hinterlegt sind.
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124249412 where the changeset comment is: revert blatant vandalism by Sussy Baka Amongus
eggie (2022-07-29 21:20:57+00:00): Hi Borewit   
Welcome to OSM in the Netherlands. 
Use for barrier=hedge a single line.. not an area.
bulding:part will not render on the map. 

Greetz,
eggie
Borewit (2022-07-30 08:56:56+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, ik heb je aanwijzingen opgevolgd.
eggie (2022-07-30 09:28:28+00:00): Mooi.. ahh .. Het is een overkapping.
Vroeg me al af waarom het niet in de BAG stond
Gebouwen worden soms periodiek geupdated, maar daar zit soms een flinke tijd tussen.
329 en 331 heb ik net goed gelegd mbv de BGT omtrekgericht. Die is vaak actueler dan het Kadaster (BAG)
Mapse
eggie
Emilius123 (2023-07-27 21:37:02+00:00): RIP to Sussy Baka Amongus
mariotomo (2023-06-05 05:17:30+00:00): hola. Si acaso conoces la extensión del lote, podrías dibujarlo como elemento linear. La etiqueta correcta para lotes baldíos en espera de construcción es landuse=greenfield.
L'imaginaire (2022-08-02 22:07:12+00:00): Dag Stijn,
Je kan niet zomaar je eigen routes beginnen intekenen in OpenStreetMap. Gebruik daarvoor liever een dienst zoals RouteYou, die met de OpenStreetMap data aan de slag gaat en jouw toelaat om persoonlijke routes op te slaan. Een andere mapper heeft jouw wijzigingen al teruggedraaid.
eggie (2022-07-29 21:36:50+00:00): Hi Raphael.
In the Netherlands all addeessnodes and buildings are import from the Dutch Land Registry. Please don't remove these addresssnodes.
.. Please don't add addressinfo at the building_shapes.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-07-29 21:38:47+00:00): Restored addressnode...
adrianojbr (2022-07-30 02:36:30+00:00): Olá, Victor 2015!

Esse trecho (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91481440) que foi alterado para sentido único permanece com uma faixa no sentido contrário (lanes:backward=1)?
Victor 2015 (2022-07-30 02:59:26+00:00): Olá, Adriano 

Não tem mais, agora a prefeitura alterou o trânsito para mão única. 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ndmais.com.br/transito/apos-reclamacoes-prefeitura-de-joinville-muda-transito-na-regiao-da-avenida-santos-dumont/amp/
adrianojbr (2022-08-20 14:25:36+00:00): Grato pelas informações!
nw520 (2022-07-29 22:24:41+00:00): Eigentliche Beschreibung:
Sportschule; Uni-Campus Umgebung Philo Café
eggie (2022-07-29 21:54:02+00:00): Hi Raphael  
You are sure the still is a powerline? ?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124248532

It's razed:power=line in the tagging.
Greetz,
eggie
DaveF (2022-07-30 11:22:28+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1357032076

There is already a website tag. Please don't duplicate data
iWowik (2022-08-17 17:12:26+00:00): что-то с переводами не так
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3222718353/history
danvyr (2022-08-17 17:20:23+00:00): ага, поправил, спасибо
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-30 12:32:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123736538, 124234487, 124234821, 124235290, 124235976, 124238358, 124238472, 124238547, 124238626, 124238640, 124238695, 124238784, 124238848, 124239944, 124240779.
george1201 (2022-08-01 09:31:43+00:00): Könnte man diese zwei Teile des Wegs "Rechts der Alb" nicht zu einem einzigen vereinigen? Die Eigenschaften sind ja identisch.
W0lle (2022-08-01 19:07:39+00:00): Das ist richtig, habe ich jetzt so eingetragen.
pitfire (2022-07-30 05:27:04+00:00): Hallo erdnussfan,
Tipp,
es währe besser, die alten Gebäudesrukturen und Adressen zu erhalten und mit Key:razed:building - razed: lifecycle prefix. zu markieren. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:razed:building
This tag is using razed: lifecycle prefix. It is used for buildings that have been demolished, sometimes without any traces left. OSM is for features existing on the ground. This tag, however, is useful for preventing other mappers from inadvertently remapping demolished features that are still visible in aerial/satellite imagery currently available in OSM editors.

Gruß pitfire
erdnussfan (2022-07-30 11:16:45+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
vielen Dank für die Anmerkung, das wusste ich noch nicht. Ich habe es jetzt geschafft, das Haus wiederauferstehen zu lassen. Allerdings habe ich überhaupt keine Ahnung, wo man key:razed:building eintragen kann. Hast du einen Tip? Gerne auch in Josm.
Danke!
pitfire (2022-07-30 12:12:15+00:00): Nee, bin ID Fan, Josm ist nicht mein Ding :-)
Hier ein paar Muster aus Augustin:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/50.77118/7.20843
oder 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/50.77160/7.20870
 Gruß
Puxan (2022-07-30 16:35:07+00:00): @sotrosan
No entiendo porque has eliminado ese edificio. Si ha sido un error puedo deshacer el cambio
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124249352
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-29 21:58:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124246539, 124246617, 124246702, 124246730, 124246763, 124246836, 124246942, 124247069, 124247149, 124247203, 124247231, 124247330.
Larmax (2022-07-31 12:53:28+00:00): Hei, huomaathan, että tekemäsi muutokset rikkoivat relaation, eikä Kallavettä näy kartalla tästä johtuen!
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 20:47:42+00:00): amenity=music_school a utiliser pour cartographier les écoles de musiques à la place de amenity=school utilisé pour le cursus scolaire (a été corrigé, pour les prochaines fois)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124249711
GneissBaker (2022-12-22 20:53:52+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the feedback; I will keep the tag you used in mind in the future.
nevw (2022-07-30 00:32:37+00:00): Hi
you have named two trails "L's lake trail", only one of which is near a lake and another "lake trail" which is also remote from a lake. Are these the actual names or something you made up.
Hufkratzer (2022-07-29 23:47:39+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082419622 and also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307506828 from 6 months ago look like riding arenas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view, but they are tagged with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding).
Filip009 (2022-07-30 06:04:09+00:00): I corrected first one, but I'm not author of the second one. I just edited it as last, but corrected only tag bing to Bing.
Hufkratzer (2022-07-30 09:50:06+00:00): Excuse me; I have now changed the second one myself.
marczoutendijk (2022-10-23 11:37:20+00:00): Hi,
On a few roads you have set highway=no_entry.
Use highway="type of highway" and then use access="type of access".
Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Eifelkobold! (2022-10-23 18:20:05+00:00): Hi marczoutendijk,

I set the tag only at nodes and not on the roads (ways). highway=no_entry is not an access restriction, it is only an entry restriction. Please read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Road_signs and in special this part (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Edge_cases) of the wiki. Thats why I choose this KISS tagging. Even if its not perfect it fits the best to situation on the ground until there is a better tagging.

Greetings

Eifelkobold
marczoutendijk (2022-10-23 18:32:59+00:00): Hi Eifelkobold!,
Thanks for the explanation.
The problem arose from the fact that the tagging shows up (with overpass) on the  highway but not on the relation!
Problem solved!
Marc.
treestryder (2023-04-15 04:28:58+00:00): May want to add access=private when adding private pools. I've fixed a few near my neighborhood, as I'm thinking about using OpenStreetBrowser to highlight our neighborhood's amenities.
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=18/42.68237/-84.62327&categories=leisure,gastro,shop,sport%5B%5D,mtb-routes,paddling_amenities,religion
ivanbranco (2022-07-31 21:05:06+00:00): Hi Fardmonke,

you changed the place value of this place from a specific one (=hamlet) to a generic one (=yes). Why you did so? If you know that is not an hamlet you should know as well what is it, so change it with another specific value instead of =yes.
Fardmonke (2022-08-01 01:38:04+00:00): Oh, sorry I made that mistake I will change it as soon as possible.
keithonearth (2023-06-28 06:46:12+00:00): I've deleted the highway=cycleway on Fourth that this edit added, because ways tagged as highway=cycleway are best used for dedicated bicycle paths, or paths shared with pedestrians. Fourth just has a painted bike lane, between the parking land for cars, and the travel lane for cars. In this case it's best to use tags on the road itself (cycleway=lane, or similar) to indicate the presence of a bike lane, which was already done.

No disrespect intended, and I hope you continue to contribute to OSM.
MxxCon (2022-07-30 00:57:59+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you convert Webster Avenue section from dual way into a single one? From what I see on satellite imagery there's a physical median between west and east lanes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124251166
snake21 (2022-07-30 03:28:10+00:00): Why does it have to be dual ways for such a short segment?
snake21 (2022-07-30 03:28:48+00:00): You can't u-turn at either end anyway so I'm not sure the purpose of mapping it that way for such a tiny piece of road
MxxCon (2022-07-30 04:15:04+00:00): It's not just about being able to u-turn, but to accurately represent road layout according to the established guidelines. I don't know the reason why DoT decided to install that median, but they considered it important, and I think it's also useful to represent that detail.
Also half of an avenue block is not what I'd call a tiny piece of road.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-31 20:06:43+00:00): Moin :)
Wäre es nicht einfacher und übersichtlicher einfach eine Fläche mit "amenity=motorcycle_parking" und "capacity=18" anzulegen?
Grüße
silversurfer83
mueschel (2022-08-06 08:58:51+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "recycling:used_oil" here, which is not used in any other place. Is that cooking oil or motor oil?
JoshIzBored (2022-08-13 01:31:15+00:00): Fixed to motor oil.
oba510 (2022-07-31 01:26:48+00:00): Why did you change outdoor_seating=parklet to outdoor_seating=no?  Zachary's has had a parklet for years and it's still there.
user4816003805 (2022-08-01 06:16:26+00:00): Hi oba510,

Sorry about that! I've restored the "outdoor_seating=parklet" tag in https://osm.org/changeset/124327369

Here's a post-mortem of what happened though. I visited Zachary's on Friday.
When I answered the StreetComplete quest, there wasn't any indication of a previous outdoor_seating tag.
OsmAnd didn't show any outdoor seating information either. OsmAnd renders outdoor_seating=yes and values like "patio", but apparently "parklet" isn't recognized, so it doesn't show any information at all.
So I didn't realize there was a previous tag. I wouldn't have changed it if I did.

That being said, when I visited on Friday, I did notice the parklet, but I vaguely recall some sign on it like "public parklet" (though I may be mistaken).
Nobody was dining out there, and when we did dine in, they didn't mention outside being an option.
I looked at their website, and also didn't notice any mention of outdoor seating.
So it seemed to me like you could get takeaway and eat it at the "public" (I assumed) parklet, but they didn't serve you there.

Anyway, it looks like I was mistaken, and going forward I'll try to check the tag values through the OSM website to make sure I'm not obliterating previous values.

Thanks for catching this mistake!
oba510 (2022-08-01 09:40:05+00:00): Yea, that was part of the original pre-covid public parklet program so I don't think they're supposed to serve customers directly there.  The idea was that people would get pizza to-go and be able to sit outside.  It doesn't get much use and I've only seen people out there around lunch time.
topolusitania (2022-07-30 15:38:46+00:00): Hello
As far as I understand, coastline must be drawn till sea tide as effects. You change it to river. Which of us is wrong ? Regards
user_177389 (2022-07-30 16:29:31+00:00): Hello,

the coastline can only be drawn as a continuous line, also because the direction is important - not as a multipolygon as with natural=water as a blue area.

This is not possible with river polygons if their border is interrupted by other line objects.

Anything that cannot be implemented correctly in terms of data technology should be left as it is.

Best regards,  
Mario
topolusitania (2022-07-30 19:29:44+00:00): From the wiki:
There are discussions about where the transition between the sea to a wide river (water=river) should occur; there is a view that this should ideally be at the top of the tidal section on the river, but it is also accepted that the junction may be closer to the mouth of the river with the tidal section of the river tagged with tidal=yes. 
At least if you do not agree with my changes to Coastline, you should use the tag "tidal=yes". Your reasons are not valid ones to prevent the use of coastline, If thera are some errors, you should corrected and not changed to coastline
Best regards
TL
user_177389 (2022-07-30 19:57:58+00:00): It's clear. But this should be done by someone well versed with OSM data, using an editor that can display errors. And which doesn't do such a crap that I had to fix because of broken boundary and multipolygon relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124251186

Best regards,  
Mario
user_177389 (2022-07-30 20:06:04+00:00): ...and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124250981
topolusitania (2022-07-30 22:34:00+00:00): Dear Garmin_user
Thank you for these words: quote "But this should be done by someone well versed with OSM data, using an editor that can display errors. And which doesn't do such a crap that I had to fix because of broken boundary and multipolygon relations"
My comments:
1- You started maping 2009 I started maping 2010
2- You have  25.177 editions, I have 16.651
3 - Netiquette should oblige a contact asking  what is wrong with this edition...
4 - If you detect some errors, you should fix it, not changing from coastline to river. Coastline is not an error, If some segments are missing you could complete it.
5- All OSM aproved editors are good for all editions. That means JOSM, iD, Rapid iD and Potlach
6 - Thank you for removing duplicate lines. It was a Out of Memory error from my PC that caused it
7 - I noticed that you have not added the tag Tidal=yes

Best regards
TL
JJIglesias (2022-07-30 08:30:50+00:00): Saludos. Estas colocando todo un area como una Edificacion y eso es INCORRECTO, por lo tanto es un error. Un Lote (place=plot) NO es un building=house o building=yes.

Por favor corrige estos errores o tendremos q borrar todas esas ediciones incorrectas.

Antes de seguir editando mal, te pedimos que visites learnosm.org.

Ademas te pedimos que leas lo siguiente: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-30 08:28:47+00:00): Saludos. Estas colocando todo un area como una Edificacion y eso es INCORRECTO, por lo tanto es un error. Un Lote (place=plot) NO es un building=house o building=yes.

Por favor corrige estos errores o tendremos q borrar todas esas ediciones incorrectas.

Antes de seguir editando mal, te pedimos que visites learnosm.org.

Ademas te pedimos que leas lo siguiente: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-30 08:31:46+00:00): Saludos. Estas colocando todo un area como una Edificacion y eso es INCORRECTO, por lo tanto es un error. Un Lote (place=plot) NO es un building=house o building=yes.

Por favor corrige estos errores o tendremos q borrar todas esas ediciones incorrectas.

Antes de seguir editando mal, te pedimos que visites learnosm.org.

Ademas te pedimos que leas lo siguiente: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
woodpeck_repair (2022-07-30 12:32:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123736538, 124234487, 124234821, 124235290, 124235976, 124238358, 124238472, 124238547, 124238626, 124238640, 124238695, 124238784, 124238848, 124239944, 124240779.
Warin61 (2022-08-01 01:03:25+00:00): Hi,

The name tag should be for 'names' only .. not descriptions line 'Radio Mast' .. use the key 'description'. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Warin61 (2022-08-01 01:04:13+00:00): Opps ...
The name tag should be for 'names' only .. not descriptions like 'Radio Mast' .. use the key 'description'.
lightbulbjim (2022-08-01 03:40:53+00:00): Noted, thanks for the pointer and the update.
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216