piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:41:51+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127479928
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127474104
mcliquid (2022-10-14 15:11:18+00:00): It was already tagged as a school here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565131257
So your entry is duplicated information.
JiannisK (2022-10-14 18:04:57+00:00): Thanks. I didn't know that. Stumbled upon this as I downloaded building data from osm (via Geofabrik, which takes data from the planet file) and was interested in extracting buildings tagged with amenity=school. In this case, the building has no tag, but the whole school grounds is tagged with amenity=school and therefore in my buildings dataset did not appear as school. This is not consistent, as other buildings are actually tagged with an amenity tag.
mcliquid (2022-10-14 18:49:13+00:00): In my understanding it's correct as it is in regards to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool).
If you have problems with the definition I suggest to contact the tagging mailinglist.
BTW: when you are searching school buildings you might better search for building=school
Have a nice day!
mcliquid (2022-10-14 18:50:27+00:00): That's the quote out of the wiki: `mark the boundary of the school using an Area`
JiannisK (2022-10-14 19:17:41+00:00): Thanks! I'm new to this and it's quite complex. I will look into the wiki! As an outsider using osm data for spatial analyses, I just thought that the amenity tag would be quite useful for buildings, as it is also used for point data in osm. If this was done consistently, one could export all polygons and points from osm with the same tag and would have the perfect overview of a certain amenity. A nice day to you too!
SomeoneElse (2022-10-30 15:26:24+00:00): Hello,
Although the changeset comment is "Update deprecated tags", can you explain what tags you actually changed on what objects here?  At least some changes (e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/59338112 ) seem unrelated to tag changes at all.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-01-08 11:55:33+00:00): I'm pretty sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103551293/history does not exist either.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-06 14:34:02+00:00): Actually, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103551293/history does show in iD's Bing imagery, but it's fairly obviously 2 large umbrellas.  I've removed it.
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-13 13:41:08+00:00): Hello again,
Just wondered what prompted the change to Lendal Cellars https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/246525501 here?  Was it a survey, or was the editor you were using suggesting that the previous tags were incorrect?
The reason that I ask is that GK-operated pubs aren't always branded GK - some are, some aren't, and if something is telling you to add that tag without a survey that thing is wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-06-01 22:49:25+00:00): ... and another question - is there definitely a supply of water at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3196447108/history ?  I have a feeling it might just be what it was previously tagged as, a stone trough.
InsertUser (2022-10-14 06:39:27+00:00): What is your source for this very large changesets?
enezeg (2025-03-06 08:41:14+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'ajouter un grand bâtiment rue du Chanoine Kerbrat et je me demandais si les valeurs du bâtiment situé au 57bis avenue de la France Libre sont toujours d'actualité. le cadastre montre un seul bâtiment pour toute la zone. Merci d'avance pour votre retour
ChRogel (2025-03-06 16:27:05+00:00): Bonjour, j’avais effacé l’ancien central téléphonique qui a été remplacé par un immeuble résidentiel placé en haut d’un ravin avec une allée de desserte des garages souterrains // à la pente . Le bâtiment du 57 bis France Libre est resté, mais sans affectation, car, nécessitant une restauration. C’est un lieu où je passe fréquemment. Merci pour l’import que j’espérais voir venir. ChRogel
jpennycook (2022-10-13 16:33:01+00:00): Hi!
Regarding this changeset, can you confirm the source for your edits?  This section of road was closed a while ago, with bollards and kerbs installed: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=402978604640921 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=427489689046900 
I am surprised that these have been removed as they looked permanent.

Jon
DaftKakapo (2022-10-13 17:05:46+00:00): Hi Jon. 

The raised curb and bollards have been removed completely and the road reinstated. This has happened in the last couple of months. I walk here every few days and will take a photo next time I pass. To be honest I am just as surprised that this feature has been removed and I'm not sure why it has. It occurred the same time as two new bollards were installed a little way up Hyde End Lane.

Thanks, Alison.
jpennycook (2022-10-13 17:39:01+00:00): Hello Alison.

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. It's great that you are basing your edits on where you have walked - there was one person who used to edit in this area who was using an out-of-date (and dubious) source who did some bad things to that road, hence why I queried it.

Could I suggest that, when you save your edit, under the box where you add your comments, in the box next to "Add field", select "Sources" then put in the source? "survey" would probably be the best one for your edits.

Jon
DaftKakapo (2022-10-13 17:51:23+00:00): Hi Jon

No problem. Thanks for the tip, I will try to remember to fill in that field going forward. I have only just started editing things as I noticed a few new paths were not on the map in the area when I went for a walk this week. Not surprising with the amount of development.

Thanks, Alison
DaftKakapo (2022-10-14 13:12:05+00:00): Photos: 
https://i.imgur.com/V1Xooh5.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/uXsxASJ.jpeg
jpennycook (2022-10-14 16:31:02+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2022-10-13 15:44:47+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. Tip.. Probeer in het vervolg bij te taggen op de adresnode,,

Ik heb wat aangepast.

MVG
eggie
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-20 03:57:13+00:00): Olá, desde já os meus parabens pelo mapeamento detalhado em areas com grandes falhas. Estou a escrever para teres mais cuidado no desenho dos predios pois vi que estas a dividir em diferentes edificios o que não deveria ser dividido pois faz parte do mesmo prédio. Tem mais cuidado pois não faz sentido separar formas se o edifício é o mesmo (mesma altura). Cumprimentos
jmrfrosa (2022-10-20 11:35:10+00:00): Olá Diogo! Obrigado por reveres as alterações. Suponho que te estejas a referir principalmente aos edifícios de apartamentos, onde a divisão entre prédios é mais difícil de distinguir? Parece haver alguma ambiguidade na wiki em relação à melhor forma de marcar estas divisões – sendo que, por exemplo, no caso dos terraces, que têm a mesma altura, é assumida a separação. Adicionalmente, tomando como exemplo cidades bastante bem mapeadas, esta convenção parece ser usada mesmo no caso de prédios da mesma altura (i.e. Hirschstraße em Karlsruhe).
Não obstante, apesar deste ter sido o meu racional ao desenhar esta zona, estou aberto a modificar as áreas para por exemplo `building:part` caso seja o estandarte da comunidade.
Cumprimentos!
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-20 17:53:19+00:00): Olá, mapear é primeiro que tudo ler o território da forma mais correta, não se trata de building:part porque nos casos que vi teus tudo faz parte do mesmo lote e edifício, aqui dividiste um mesmo edifício em 3 partes como se fossem distintas ou como se de 3 edifícios de tratasse. Maioritariamente isso acontece em muitos prédios de esquina que mapeias e acabas por separar em edifícios diferentes quando é o mesmo. Também que vi com alguma incoerência há prédios que incluíste as varandas e outros não. Só o que toca no chão é que deve ser mapeado, depois com o level=n e o building:part, para melhor discussão sugiro entrares no grupo do telegram da comunidade portuguesa, cumprimentos!
https://t.me/OSMPortugal
jmrfrosa (2022-10-20 18:37:08+00:00): Olá Diogo, nesse caso foi mesmo lapso meu em relação à divisão do edifício, vou tentar rectificar numa próxima alteração - obrigado pela advertência!

Em relação às varandas e à tag `building:part` penso que é mais produtivo continuar a discussão no Telegram, como dizes, já que são um pouco ambíguas de mapear como parte do edifício principal; enviei há pouco um link sobre isso mesmo. Infelizmente nem sempre consigo seguir uma definição à risca, como apontas, porque muitas vezes é difícil de perceber pelas imagens aéreas.
Cumprimentos e obrigado pela atenção ao mapeamento da zona :)
Frans S (2022-10-14 09:28:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just a remark about tagging highway.
You tagged a 4 mtr wide road as path. Unclassified is a better tag.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127476620
BubbaJuice (2022-10-13 20:07:39+00:00): Hello 19timber96,

Could you make these heath polygons of higher quality? (Making them follow the exact outlines of the area, not connecting to landuse, not tagging landuse/preserves as heath. I recommend using JOSM with the plugin fastdraw for these so you can do it in a timely manner.

-BubbaJuice
BubbaJuice (2022-10-13 20:27:48+00:00): I made this to help distinguish between scrub and heath. The Sonoran Desert is more scrub oriented while hotter, dryer deserts are more heath oriented. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:BubbaJuice/Heath_vs._Scru
BubbaJuice (2022-10-13 20:43:04+00:00): Correct link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:BubbaJuice/Heath_vs._Scrub
fndoder (2022-10-13 18:23:05+00:00): А какой источник дат постройки и этажности, можно, пожалуйста, ссылку?
(тоже хочу для некоторых домов добавить)
Larmax (2022-10-13 18:42:19+00:00): That's incorrect since that's from pre-revolution days when Russian had a letter "i". It's tagged incorrectly anyways as the russian name is not in use anymore
silversurfer83 (2022-10-14 06:54:13+00:00): Hi Killaking

please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments and be so kind as to act accordingly. Thank you
Muhmaker (2022-10-14 08:49:12+00:00): Moin. Ich denke dass deine Verwendung von access=conditionial hier nicht korrekt ist. Diese Kombination gibt es auch nur ca. 130 Mal in der Datenbank und macht meiner Meinung nach keinen Sinn. Man braucht immer einen allgemeingültigen Wert (hier access=no) der immer außerhalb der Bedingung gilt. Ich habe den bewusst allgemein gewählt weil auf fast allen Wegstücken Radfahren nicht erlaubt ist und die Angestellten und Zulieferer sicher auch ohne OSM-Navi klar kommen und hier vernachlässigt werden können. Mit foot:conditional wird dann die Bedingung für Fußgänger festgelegt wann von der allgemeinen Access-Regel abgewichen werden kann. Ich werde die Tore wieder in den vorherigen Zustand zurück versetzen und möchte dich bitten die dann in Ruhe zu lassen
DeFra85 (2022-10-14 17:29:32+00:00): Ahhh, das wusste ich nicht.
Hatte gedacht, das wäre noch die Sperrung aus Corona-Lockdown-Zeiten.
eggie (2022-10-16 16:16:43+00:00): Beste BerMule... Waarom verwijder je alle looproutes in het voetgangersgebied? Die kunnen nodig zijn voor de routering. Er staat nergens in een wiki dat we geen looproutes mogen intekeken. De routering zal het hier niet meer doen.
Stel zoiets svp ter discussie op het forum en/of overleg met de voorgaande mapper. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127477793

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-16 16:22:13+00:00): Routering hersteld met highway=pedestrian
zstadler (2023-10-11 12:20:47+00:00): שלום ירון,

האם הצבע הירוק שהוספת בעריכה זו הוא של סימון שבילים של החברה להגנת הטבע, או סימון של מישהו אחר, כמו שבילי אופניים של קק"ל?
zstadler (2023-10-11 16:27:47+00:00): שלום ירון,


אני רואה שאכן יש שם סימון כחול (לא ירוק) של הוועדה לשבילי ישראל.

תודה שהוספת אותו למפה!

זאב
YaronAG (2023-10-13 09:36:22+00:00): היי זאב,
לא מתאים לי להתבלבל בצבעים, אבל היי, סימון מלפני שנה, לך תזכור.. אם ראית בשטח שזה כחול, תודה על התיקון!
בעיקרון הסימון ממשיך גם אחרי הפיצול למצפה, אבל לא המשכתי איתו בפעם זו. זה ברשימה שלי.. יחד עם עוד כמה כחולים בגליל שרשום לי להמשיך!
zstadler (2023-10-13 12:39:01+00:00): הי ירון,
זה לא אתה שהתבלבלת בצבעים, זה אני.

אתה מיפית שביל כחול ואני רשמתי שביל ירוק בהודעה הראשונה

ההודעה השניה היתה אמורה להיות הודעת "אתה בסדר, הכל בסדר", אבל נראה שגם שם הצלחתי לפספס...

זאב
YaronAG (2023-10-15 19:31:22+00:00): טוב, שאלה יהיו הבעיות שלנו, טעויות בתקשורת כאלו... תודה. נקווה לחזור לימי שקט עבור טיולים וסימונים בהקדם.
ירון
hatul (2024-07-07 09:49:16+00:00): שלום ירון, הכחול ממשיך עד למצפה?
YaronAG (2024-07-08 06:28:44+00:00): אהלן,
למיטב זכרוני, הכחול ממשיך דרומה אחרי השער, לא יודע עד כמה. השביל היוצא ממנו אל המצפה הוא ללא סימון שבילים.
hatul (2024-07-08 07:36:04+00:00): תודה, אז אשאיר בינתיים ככה.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 18:06:04+00:00): you should change the type, not delete it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554049521/history
SomeoneElse (2023-03-05 19:03:49+00:00): I'm confused - how did https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3196433293/history get changed to a pub here?
puchaczowsky (2022-10-17 16:39:04+00:00): lepsze byłoby już rozcięcie obecnego landuse'a na kawałki, ale to może ja się tym zajmę ;)
jqngarcia (2022-10-14 06:03:29+00:00): Buenos Dias dedus16, si el edificio tiene dos accesos, puedes borrar las etiquetas de la via i añadir dos puntos del tipo entrance=yes con los datos de las dos direcciones postales.

Salud y Mapas, JQN
gudensberger (2023-10-30 22:37:42+00:00): Hallo,

openstreetmap.org/node/10098490697 scheint direkt auf einer normalen Straße zu sein, so beabsichtigt?
LG
A-lo (2023-10-31 06:26:31+00:00): Hallo,

danke. Nein das kann tatsächlich so dort nicht existieren. Ich kann mir aber aus der Ferne nicht mehr erklären, wo es eigentlich hin sollte. Wir sollten es löschen.
Viele Grüße
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:39:23+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. 
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127479928
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 19:23:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10098122129/history has shop = cbd that was added in this edit
shop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here?
sheldonelectric (2025-05-14 19:28:29+00:00): Hey there! I'm not sure what had happened, maybe there was no "cannabis" tag on osmand~ back then, or I didn't know there was one. I corrected it now.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 19:40:43+00:00): Thanks for fix! If you encounter it with new version of Osmand it may be worth reporting to its authors :)
tux67 (2022-10-14 08:23:52+00:00): Hi,
schau doch auch mal auf das ruins=yes .. ich denke in diesem Fall ist das auch nicht korrekt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ruins?uselang=de
Nach dem Wikipedia Artikel ist der Bergfried intakt und hätte ggf. noch einen node mit tourism=viewpoint  verdient. 
https://www.wassenberg.de/besucher/sehenswuerdigkeiten/bergfried/
Gruß tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127480424
krb100 (2022-10-14 09:30:03+00:00): Top, danke! Habe ich hinzugefügt.
archie (2022-10-13 17:10:58+00:00): Hi, why link to your wikipage via descripiton-tag? The description-tag is not intended for this sort of information. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description)
archie (2022-10-13 17:15:40+00:00): Oh, sorry, forget about it. It's in the meta-tagging!
Jrachi (2022-10-13 17:26:46+00:00): "adeguati tracktype in base a immagini aeree"
Ma spiegami come fai a capire la solidità di una superficie stradale in base alla immagini aeree!
paganella31 (2022-10-13 17:50:56+00:00): https://imgur.com/QONkTxA
La differenza mi pare netta, erano mappate tutte e due come grade1 quindi con superficie pavimentata.

L'intenzione mia era quella di correggere le divergenze più grossolane, conoscendo la zona so che non sono tutte strade asfaltate o simili.
Poi sono d'accordo che solo con le foto aeree non si possa determinare le caratteristiche precise del fondo stradale. Infatti ho solo differenziato tra grade1 e grade2, cioè nelle mie intenzioni tra superficie pavimentata e non.

Secondo te si poteva fare (o non fare) diversamente?
Jrachi (2022-10-13 19:13:23+00:00): Scrivere sul commento e origine dati che conoscevi le strade che hai ritaggato.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Kovoschiz (2022-10-14 10:10:34+00:00): It's not needed to have address-only names, unless it has special styling. (eg 700 Nathan; Nathan 700, Seven Hundred Nathan, etc)
andyonthewings (2022-10-14 10:17:39+00:00): Somehow it's the official name as appeared in https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/s/B/1108233780

I have no opinion on whether to keep the name tag or not though.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-13 18:05:16+00:00): Hallo Frauke,
mit welchen Bildern hast du gearbeitet? Die Form sieht jetzt besser aus, aber die Lage ist teilweise schlechter als vorher.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127482792
FraukeLeo (2022-10-13 18:45:13+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, mit den neuen Esri-Bildern wie angegeben. Die aktuellen Luftbilder (Bing, Esri, Maxar) unterscheiden sich hier aber wirklich nur um Zentimeter, da springt nichts beim Umschalten. Wenn du genauere Quellen hast, kannst du es natürlich gern zurechtschieben :)
Langlaeufer (2022-10-13 19:32:08+00:00): Ah, dann liegt es vermutlich nicht an den Bildern. Ich hab mich nur gewundert, dass du bei der B217 gelegentlich nicht die Straßenmitte gemappt hast, sondern teilweise seitlich vom Mittelsperrstreifen.
FraukeLeo (2022-10-13 21:35:49+00:00): Du meinst wahrscheinlich die Einmündung der Lubahnstraße? Das mag jetzt Geschmacksache sein, aber ich weiß nicht, wieso der OSM-Way immer in der exakten Mitte der Fahrbahn verlaufen müsste. Es gibt in OSM good practice die Regel "keep straight roads straight". Wer in Richtung Hameln auf der B 217 hier rüberfährt, fährt exakt geradeaus, und wenn der OSM-Way im Kreuzungsbereich nach Südosten gezogen wird, um exakt in der Mitte zu sein, dann sieht der nach Hameln fahrende Fahrer eine Verschwenkung, die real gar nicht da ist. Ich finde, wenn bei einer zweispurigen Straße mal eine Abbiegespur dazukommt, kann der OSM-Way trotzdem schnurgerade weiterlaufen, ohne um eine halbe Spur zu verschwenken, einfach weil der Verkehr (der nicht abbiegende) das auch tut und 90 Prozent aller Fahrer einfach geradeaus fahren. Guck dir mal eine Fahrt durch Hasperde-Bahnhof in einer perspektivischen Ansicht (z.B. Magic Earth) an. Real könnte man das Lenkrad festschrauben, aber in OSM macht die Straße dauernd zickzack. Das finde ich nicht schön. Aber, wie gesagt, das ist Geschmacksache :)
Joseph R P (2022-10-16 01:42:29+00:00): I don't think any of these roads should have been upgraded, especially after it was agreed upon that trunk was for roads like US 95, US 50, etc. Pyramid Way only leads to subdivisions of Reno, no other cities of similar importance. Having disconnected/dead-end trunk roads contradicts everything we worked on in Nevada. 

As for the primary roads: Sparks Boulevard probably makes sense as primary, I'm too sure about Sun Valley Boulevard, and as for Vista Boulevard- definitely not if it's going to parallel Sparks Boulevard. It doesn't really go anywhere besides some Sparks sprawl.

I think there should be a discussion about this on the highway classification OSM US Slack channel.