piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-11-14 11:24:24+00:00): Hallo whb,
Du hast diese beiden Straßenabschnitte
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000930345/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975608577/history
mit 
highway=construction
voll gesperrt.

Wie lange soll die Sperrung denn andauern und wo gibt es Infos dazu?

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit brouter-suspects:
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=18/8.74852/49.36447&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
PT-53 (2021-11-28 11:50:19+00:00): Hallo whb,
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
whb (2021-11-30 18:50:38+00:00): Guten Tag,

siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104780975
Jose Luis Chavez del Cid (2021-11-17 03:21:13+00:00): Cual es el objetivo de estas ediciones, que valor agregan a los datos de OSM?
DressyPear4 (2021-11-10 10:11:50+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser abreviados nem copiados do google.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113587454
ravali_78 (2021-11-10 04:11:41+00:00): Hi Bella Lago,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with node 9239439682,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113590842.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113587469
DressyPear4 (2021-11-10 10:19:47+00:00): Suas edições foram revertidas.
praeteritum (2023-06-03 07:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136891676.
kartler175 (2021-11-12 17:24:51+00:00): Das sind keine Multipolygone. Multipoygone haben keine Mitglieder mit der Rolle 'landuse'.

http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=13013737
 http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=13013738
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
nevw (2021-11-10 09:35:48+00:00): Hi
If the roads are complete you no longer need the proposed or construction tags. They can be deleted.
clay_c (2021-12-19 05:19:45+00:00): Hi Nick,

Could you explain what the ref value of "FAP 370" represents, and why it was applied on such a short segment of Western Boulevard?

In the future, please use more descriptive changeset comments than "adding details". Consider being more specific on what kinds of details you're adding. If you can summarize what you've worked on, it saves a lot of time and effort on the part of other mappers.

-Clay
nickvet419 (2021-12-20 00:17:27+00:00): part of the Federal-aid highway program.  but removed ref for now.
snoozingnewt (2023-03-23 18:20:53+00:00): Hi, what is the meaning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000937959/history ?
dufekin (2023-08-28 22:57:35+00:00): This is just the grounds of the institution named.  The boundary comes from USGS topographic maps, and the state still owns the land.  Obviously, there's a conflict with the prison, but it's not obvious to me where the boundary should be, so I went ahead and mapped both institutions.
snoozingnewt (2023-08-29 01:19:09+00:00): Sorry, should have been more specific. Why is “leisure=park” a tag on it?
dufekin (2023-08-29 16:54:44+00:00): This is also a historic site, which is (or was and soon again will be) open to the public. Somewhere in there lies the historic Fort Supply, originally constructed circa 1868.  It looks like the prison recently closed, the historic site is undergoing some sort of refurbishing, and I'm not sure what happened to the mental hospital or what else the state is doing with the site, especially its outermost reaches.
snoozingnewt (2023-08-29 22:37:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

I still don't get the connection between the place being a historic site and it being a park.
Lostmonkey (2025-04-20 15:37:12+00:00): Ang. PrivatBar ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9239254000 ) Jeg ved ikke hvordan den skal tagges, men der er i hvert fald ikke en bar på dette sted. Tror det er adresse for et firma, som arrangerer fester.
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-11-17 08:15:17+00:00): a linha 545911819 apresenta erro, corrigir
AntMadeira (2021-11-17 12:23:40+00:00): Obrigado. Já foi corrigido.
Esta zona está repleta de áreas duplicadas (place=* em ponto e área) e que não são verificáveis. No entanto, deixo isso para outros...
archpdx (2021-11-10 03:17:37+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, please don't add duplicate address nodes - in this scenario the node you added at the end of the driveway was sufficient.

Additionally, we don't use names to describe features on the map, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I removed the name from the driveway and address and removed the duplicate address for the entrance. If this driveway is gated you can add a gate point along the driveway.

-archpdx
MxxCon (2021-11-10 06:39:56+00:00): Hello.
Is "Right Section" the official name of this way or is it just something you named?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113589382
larryv (2021-11-10 18:12:33+00:00): The way already had that name when I started working on it. This map published on the cemetery's website seems to corroborate it:

http://www.mountzioncemetery.com/images/grounds_large.gif

(linked from http://www.mountzioncemetery.com/page.asp?id=aboutus)
NM$L (2021-11-10 04:24:52+00:00): 此变更集为政治编辑，已被回退。
user_5359 (2021-11-10 09:50:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/176491052/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the coresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
carfog81 (2021-11-18 22:03:03+00:00): Hola. Por qué eliminaste las relaciones multipolígono que tenía para definir las estaciones del MIO?
AngocA (2021-11-19 05:31:31+00:00): Hola Carfog81, las borré porque dibujé como las plataformas de abordaje. Además, en una nota indicaban que todas las plataformas estaban mapeadas como estaciones, y el término estación tiene la connotación de terminal en inglés. Por lo tanto arreglé todo eso.
Lo arreglé en dos cambios, el presente y este:  113590454
Y la nota es: Nota 840919 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/840919
carfog81 (2021-11-22 02:32:45+00:00): Sabes que no estoy muy de acuerdo con eso. Por lo general trato de mapear usando relaciones multipolígono porque considero que evitan errores en la topología de las entidades de OSM. Hay que tener en cuenta que esas plataformas y su espacio interior peatonal entre ellas son consideradas como una estación en Cali. Si  "station" equivale a una terminal, hay que buscar algo que las pueda contener (aunque estoy de acuerco con "station"). Por cierto, no sé que tanto conoces el sistema de Cali, pero cada una de esas plataformas tiene un código (que no lo tengo en este momento) por lo que no estaría bien llamar a cada una de esas plataformas con el nombre de las estación. Por cierto, había dedicado bastante tiempo a organizar esas relaciones. Gracias
AngocA (2021-11-26 00:59:23+00:00): Hola, había pasado este mensaje, y no me había dado cuenta de tu respuesta. Cuando hice el cambio, tomé la precaución de hacerlo, ya que como puedes ver en el siguiente query, no hay mucho mapeado sobre transporte público en Cali: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ds7
El problema no son las relaciones, sino que estás confundiendo conceptos de mapeo de transporte. Supongo que quieres usar la etiqueta stop area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area para el área que representa los puntos de parada de buses (ruta), más las "estaciones" (vagones) como tal, y en general el área. Pero como puedes ver, eso no se llama station, sino stop area. Además, como puedes ver solo borré 4 relaciones, por lo que se ve que no hay un esquema homogéneo de transporte en Cali; el resto de estaciones no tiene esa área alrededor la cual es muy útil. De pronto si debí haber convertido esas relaciones a stop area, pero me pareció más pertinente homogenizar los "platform" y los "stops". Finalmente, estoy de acuerdo con que las plataformas no tengan ese nombre sino el código que dices (Es igual que el Transmilenio, la base de todos estos BIRT), en cambio para que el stop area si tenga el nombre de la estación (un único nombre en el mapa). Pero con las primeras estaciones que comencé a trabjar estaban mapeadas así sin el polígono circundante (las del costado oriental de Cali). 
Otra etiqueta que veo que has agregado es garage, y no entiendo eso.
AngocA (2021-11-26 01:02:18+00:00): Para que revises mis cambios, estos son los otros changesets del transporte de Cali:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113590454
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113589611
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113588058
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-11-11 06:58:41+00:00): Откат.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113590805
user_5359 (2021-11-10 09:33:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8789026994. You move the node more than 100 meters. Please check the position.
Enock4seth (2021-11-12 00:01:43+00:00): Does this make any difference?
Risle (2021-11-16 15:55:42+00:00): Hi Enock4seth, thank you for reaching out, I've made some changes based on the aerodrome boundary wall, which you can see with Maxar Premium Imagery. This changeset shows the major changes I worked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113687419.
kawino85 (2021-11-12 17:21:19+00:00): Is this a zoning import? I'm just asking because most areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000975679 are merged together with streetlines.
zstadler (2022-01-24 15:24:54+00:00): Hello luminac,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

In this edit you have changed the name of the street to HaBalonim. 

This name was previously used in OSM and it was later corrected to 3965.

What is the source of the name "HaBalonim"?

Best regards,
Zeev
luminac (2022-01-25 08:03:32+00:00): Hi,
From the information we have the actual name is HaBalonim. the location leads that street when searching HaBalonim on google.
zstadler (2022-01-25 13:45:24+00:00): Hi,

Please clarify who owns "the information we [Madlan] have". Does it refer to Madlan's own Intellectual Property (IP) or to 3rd party IP?

In any case, the information used by Google is IP. Therefore, it 
is not a valid source for OSM updates.

OSM mappers can freely use the facts on the ground, such as street signs. Otherwise, the owner of the IP needs to accept the OSM license in order to use it, even indirectly, for OSM updates.

Best regards,
Zeev
zstadler (2025-05-30 14:17:34+00:00): Restored the official street name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166974571
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 08:33:20+00:00): Hi 不来哉, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind this deletions? Thanks.

Full changeset information: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=113592994#14/27.7993/113.0999

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_11435438 (2021-11-20 08:09:43+00:00): 贵校学生在开放社区上的一系列举动实在令人大跌眼镜。
user_14250389 (2021-11-20 09:39:12+00:00): 看起來是教師為中南大學的學生佈置了繪製開放街圖之作業，但學生並無使用經驗從而亂畫一團。
It seems that the teacher assigned the homework to draw OSM for the students of Central South University, but students have no experience in using it and draw a vandalism changeset.
user_14250389 (2021-11-20 09:40:32+00:00): 所有帶有「中南」、「地信」這樣字眼的位於該城市的變更集，皆要拜該校不負責任的教師所賜。
All changesets in the city with words like "中南" and "地信" in comment must be responsed by the irresponsible teachers of this university.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-20 09:54:21+00:00): @琉璃百合
我之前曾经给中南大学的部分学生指出过这个问题，可见这些修改集：

https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/113474671
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/113477481

不过似乎并没有在社区上得到答复。
我也很想听听教师对绘图质量是如何把控的。如果早知道如此，完全可以换一种作业形式。不然等作业完成以后，还需要我们社区志愿者来擦屁股。
不来哉 (2021-11-20 12:48:53+00:00): 大家好，对于这片区域大量标记被删除，是因为这些标记都是之前我没有了解编辑规则而进行的错误编辑。请大家放心，我并没有删除重要（正确）的标记。很抱歉自己的愚蠢行为给大家带来了困扰，并且给学校带来了不好的影响！还希望大家发现不对时给予我批评与指教。Hello everyone, a large number of marks in this area were deleted, because these marks were wrongly edited by me without understanding the editing rules.  Rest assured that I did not remove important (correct) marks.  I'm really sorry that my stupid behavior has brought trouble to everyone and brought bad influence to the school!  Also hope that everyone found wrong to give me criticism and advice.
Famlam (2021-11-20 21:04:16+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114040686

Eenrichtingsverkeer bestaat nog steeds, zelfs al lijkt het onlogisch. Ga maar kijken.
syntex (2021-11-11 00:57:18+00:00): Wycofany
macaddr (2021-12-02 21:10:37+00:00): Cześć, nie dodajemy tagu name do jednego z budynków szkoły - jest to nazwa całej szkoły, a nie danego budynku. Jest ona już dodana do jej terenu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945606246

Nie dodajemy również nazwy "Wyspa" do obiektu który jest jako wyspa oznaczony, tak jak nie dodajemy nazwy "Garaż" do budynku oznaczonego jako garaż :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Heinz_V (2022-01-11 08:10:25+00:00): You made correction to NH24: 
1) do not delete mapped ways but make corrections; else the history is completely deleted. 
2) each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD204 (2022-01-11 14:10:22+00:00): Hi  Heinz_V,

I will add a new way to make any road dual carriage instead going forward and have added the relations back as suggested
InsertUser (2021-11-11 23:47:06+00:00): The archipelago is the Lucayan Archipelago currently mapped as a separate relation as it includes Turks and Caicos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113594883
NM$L (2021-11-11 17:13:37+00:00): According to de facto, Pangda Village is under the control of China. So its is_in:country tag should be filled with China although you see the village is in the Bhutan side on OSM which is because the DWG is stopping users from changing the boundary when the fact changes.
charl3s (2022-01-20 22:57:53+00:00): ten budynek na pewno istnieje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846978531
kubahahaha (2022-01-20 23:17:19+00:00): Tak, znam nawet właścicieli i dlatego zaznaczyłem ;-)
charl3s (2022-01-20 23:23:49+00:00): Ok
KVI0n (2021-11-10 08:05:39+00:00): #mbx_france_roads
fx99 (2021-11-10 15:33:35+00:00): Einige Punkte waren massive verschoben, deshalb revert.
KVI0n (2021-11-10 08:05:13+00:00): #mbx_france_roads
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
KVI0n (2021-11-10 08:04:48+00:00): #mbx_france_roads
kaart_fietser (2021-11-20 12:04:32+00:00): What is the criterion for a road class to be either primary or secondary? I would argue that the whole N50 is highway=primary.
eggie (2021-11-10 09:17:30+00:00): Dag Casper... Je pad heb ik even een verbinding gegeven met de track op de parkeerplaats. Het zal anders niet routeren.
Tip.. Vergeet niet commentaar bij je uploads te geven. Je hebt surface=unpaved verwijderd, maar dat was volgens mij juist correct.
surface=ground kan bv ook. 
MVG
eggie
okadatsuneo (2021-11-10 08:06:54+00:00): ○○x丁目の○○の地名が行政領域リレーションのラベルとして登録されているので、それらはhamletのまま残しています。
Falsernet (2021-11-20 15:53:57+00:00): The satellite imagery is actually outdated on this. Having been past I can confirm it's been demolished
bxl-forever (2021-11-10 10:54:26+00:00): Hello again,
Thanks for your recent edits.  The information is relevant and you seem to use the tags quite well.
Just one minor thing: tags and values are usually written in lower case, e.g. the type of food they serve.  Therefore not "cuisine=International" but "cuisine=international".
I fixed this one.
zazablue (2021-11-10 11:42:56+00:00): Thank you for the correction, duly noted!
opendcc (2021-11-11 18:04:56+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier den C&C zum EDEKA gewandelt. Seit wann ist das so?
amgosm (2021-11-13 07:02:01+00:00): Hallo, m.E. nach ist der Name C&C nicht mehr aktuell. Es handelt sich um einen Edeka C+C Großmarkt. Gerne vor Ort nochmal prüfen und ändern. Webseite: https://edekacc.de/
opendcc (2021-11-13 07:42:53+00:00): Genau so ist. Der Name ich C+C Großmarkt und nicht Edeka. Edeka ist halt der Betreiber - wenn man das Edeka taggen würde (so wie es der automatische, aber falsche Vorschlag von iD vorschlägt), dann verwechselt man das mit den normalen Supermarkt. Gleiches gilt für das Shop-Attribut - es ist wholesale, nicht supermarket.

Momentan läuft da innerhalb der OSM-Community eh eine Diskussion über die quasi halbautomatische Taggerei des iD, der da einfach großzügig sog. Taggingfehler moniert und automatisch Änderungen vorschlägt.
amgosm (2021-11-13 08:24:53+00:00): OK, habe ich noch nicht verfolgt. Auf der Webseite von edekacc steht der Name Edeka C+C Großmarkt. Dann sollte der Name wohl dahingehend geändert werden. Dürfen dort nur Gewerbekunden einkaufen? Dann wäre wholesale m.E. gerechtfertigt. Oder kann dort "jeder" einkaufen und es heißt nur "Großmarkt"?
opendcc (2021-11-13 13:33:27+00:00): Man braucht einen Gewerbeschein, um reinzukommen. Und die Gurken gibt es nur in der 10kg Dose und den Senf im Eimer - oder doch in der Einzeltüte, aber dann halt VPE 1000.
Mannivu (2021-11-10 16:08:00+00:00): Cerchiamo di mantenere dei changeset limitati spazialmente. Un changeset che attraversa mezza Italia è difficile da valutare.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113597846
user_10901495 (2021-11-10 17:37:38+00:00): Scusi è impossibile modificare delle relazioni che attraversano mezza Italia senza far apparire il changeset come un changeset che attraversa mezza Italia.
user_10901495 (2021-11-10 17:38:55+00:00): Mi dispiace per lei ma purtroppo funziona così. In realtà penso che lo sappia meglio di me quindi non capisco perché mi debba fare certi commentk.
user_10901495 (2021-11-10 18:38:24+00:00): In realtà mi sono sbagliato, pensavo che si riferisse al changeset dove avevo modificato la relazione dell'Italia.
Comunque il suo commento resta inadeguato su questo changeset specifico, dato che non è tanto grande e le sue modifiche sono concentrate in due luoghi (oltre ai cambiamenti delle relazioni in Valchiavenna).
Cristoffs (2021-11-19 19:22:08+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś znacznik budynku z stacji trafo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113598046
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-10 13:30:11+00:00): Hi! The previous editing was not incorrect. All motorways in the region were aligned with precise aerial imagery and must be connected to the right merging location, because with autonomous vehicles appearing, we need more precise merge points. Please ask before modifying precisely aligned data.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-10 13:31:53+00:00): Sorry! I just see that you corrected the previous bad edit that was done by somebody else! Sorry, your edit is correct!!!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
tanonin (2022-02-11 20:28:11+00:00): Emplacement erroné "Chez Liadet"
Carto'Cité (2021-11-30 12:44:38+00:00): Salut,
En complément de la voie verte, j'ai précisé que ce chemin piéton https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001041811 était utilisable pour les cyclistes sinon la voie verte ne peut pas être empruntée par les calculateurs.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CatoVeloIdF
marczoutendijk (2021-11-14 19:07:55+00:00): Hello Map47,

I have contacted you on your personal account page, regarding your lack of contact with other OSM users. Are you aware of the fact that everytime someone is commenting here (on your changeset), you should get an e-mail notification of that!
Do you ever check your mail for OSM messages?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Tesla (2021-11-10 16:53:01+00:00): Такие удаления "для перерисовки" крайне не приветствуются. Хотите перерисовать - редактируйте существующее.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-14 19:07:48+00:00): Hello Map47,

I have contacted you on your personal account page, regarding your lack of contact with other OSM users. Are you aware of the fact that everytime someone is commenting here (on your changeset), you should get an e-mail notification of that!
Do you ever check your mail for OSM messages?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SekeRob (2021-11-10 15:45:55+00:00): You're eliminating ways between areas within the same relation that are left there INTENTIONALLY as crop/produce details can very, allowing easy splitting at later date. If that's a problem to you, than I will put each section in a separate relation.

Meanwhile your change set descriptions continue to be MEANINGLESS, no link to the signalled reference at all to understand why you do what you do.

cheers
SekeRob (2021-11-10 15:59:07+00:00): Since you deem it not necessary to communicate, I've filed a complaint with DWG (Data Working Group). We'll see what they have to say.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-14 19:09:02+00:00): Hello Map47,

I have contacted you on your personal account page, regarding your lack of contact with other OSM users. Are you aware of the fact that everytime someone is commenting here (on your changeset), you should get an e-mail notification of that!
Do you ever check your mail for OSM messages?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-11-14 19:07:27+00:00): Hello Map47,

I have contacted you on your personal account page, regarding your lack of contact with other OSM users. Are you aware of the fact that everytime someone is commenting here (on your changeset), you should get an e-mail notification of that!
Do you ever check your mail for OSM messages?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2021-11-10 12:37:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-10 21:24:25+00:00): Dag Luca.. Dat is een lastige, want een gebouw rendert altijd boven landuse.
layer=1 gaat bv niet helpen. 
Wanneer het gebouw ondergronds ligt tag ik het met building:part=yes
Dat rendert niet op de kaart. 
Ligt een gedeelte onder de grond?
Verder ligt het gebouw niet precies volgens de BAG. Dat zal ik aanpassen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-10 21:27:23+00:00): Eigenlijk weinig aan te doen...  
Het ligt niet onder de grond. Wanneer je trucjes gaat gebruiken zoals inner relaties dan wordt het taggen voor de renderer. Dat is een doodszonde in OSM :)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-11 06:53:00+00:00): ... of met kunst en vliegwerk een pedestrian area maken 
highway=pedestrian
area=yes

Dat layer 1 geven
Daar maak je een multipolygoon van en neem je de groenvoorziening in op als inners.
Er worden immers ook parkeerdakken opgenomen bovenop gebouwen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Succes,
eggie
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-11-11 06:55:51+00:00): Это всё выдуманные названия, удалил.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113601508