piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-07 09:55:21+00:00): can you use changeset comments communicating what was actually changed?

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Especially if you import stuff - please specify that in changeset description and obey https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-04-07 13:55:26+00:00): the building outline was updated
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:37:41+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:16:51+00:00): track, not major highway. Also not connected. way 926929822
rthik007 (2021-04-12 03:56:30+00:00): Hi annag1133552,
Building polygon overlapping with Residential road WAY: 29583372 it was aligned by other user 
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102451172
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102438469
5m4u9 (2021-04-07 21:40:05+00:00): esta edición fue revertida
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:21:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
Becky Candy (2021-04-21 08:40:52+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102438909
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-04-07 09:17:16+00:00): Hi ☺ Thanks for the changes!

Your changeset contains changes both in Scotland and in Vietnam (for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926936213 ). Consider submitting two separate changesets in such situation. Otherwise, every mappers in between get notified! Thanks in advance.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Becky Candy (2021-05-11 12:11:28+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, and avoid attaching buildings to landuse , thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102439334
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Horza (2021-04-20 06:48:13+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the contribution, but two things

Buildings tend to have right-angle corners, please use the square function (Q) to square buildings you add.

You accidentally connected a building to a road, please don't do this.

Thanks for mapping,
Horza
brianboru (2021-04-08 18:04:54+00:00): These are terraced houses and are all joined together they are not separate- easiest to bulk delete them and start again!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131088 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
trigpoint (2021-04-07 12:30:12+00:00): Just wondering why you added a motorway here?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4907 .
SomeoneElse (2021-04-18 13:39:14+00:00): Hello,

I'm just adding a note here because https://weeklyosm.eu/archives/14443 has linked to this changeset.  As you can see from my comment above, the DWG was asked by HOT to revert a number of poor-quality edits (performed by a company that had just found the tasks on HOT's website; no-one explicitly asked them to map in this location).  Most of the problems around here were tidied up long ago (the motorway was removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102563477 ), but other edits worldwide were of similarly poor quality and have also been reverted.
If anyone has any questions about any of this, just drop the DWG an email at data@openstreetmap.org and we'll explain the story as best we can.
.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131088 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
rthik007 (2021-04-12 05:26:47+00:00): Hi ninacheng,
Building polygons overlapping with Residential road
way 128577209
way 128577206
way 116338407
as it was aligned by other user 
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MountTyree.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102440356
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4907 .
aixbrick (2021-04-07 08:31:52+00:00): Tulpenweg 2 und Indestraße 20 gab es bereits. Gelöscht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102462382.
rthik007 (2021-04-12 05:14:58+00:00): Hi ininchung,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with way 69205492.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102768606
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102440816
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4907 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4907 .
aixbrick (2021-04-07 08:33:30+00:00): Woher weisst du, dass das Haus als weitere Hausnummer 22a hat? Selbst in  den amtlichen Daten (ALKIS) steht das nicht. Nenne bitte deine Quelle.
flierfy (2021-04-10 16:43:49+00:00): Hello,
you made this changeset, which dublicated many ways in the edited area. I don't know what you intended by this. But I do know that this needs to be corrected. It would be kind of you, if you would take on this task yourself.
With kind regards, Stephan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131088 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131088 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4907 .
vickychan (2021-04-07 06:33:19+00:00): #gomicron21twsg
#gomicron21tw
#gomicron21twf16peephoto
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 00:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103157071 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
laznik (2021-04-08 06:47:41+00:00): Zaniknute dediny Lest a Horné Opatovce nie su spravne otagovane.

Okrem znemeny hodnot v kluci "name" (vyhodit text "zaniknutá obec") by som odporucal pridat tag demolished:place=village

Poprosil by som o odpoved na tento komentar, aby som vedel ze to citate.
ash_win (2021-04-12 08:51:59+00:00): Hi Richard Guo,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on roads.Kindly check way 831016246
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102786641
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102442166
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
trial (2021-04-07 18:45:16+00:00): Hi two things:
- currency:EUR yes  is useless as the shop is in France and the currency for France is EUR. It makes sense only if other currencies (segal for instance) are also accepted.
- the correct format for phones in France is +33 X XX XX XX XX.
user_5359 (2021-04-07 18:57:39+00:00): - currency:EUR=yes is better than payment:euro (yes If I had been tough I could have deleted it directly)
- The display programme is responsible for a country-specific display of call numbers. The defined data format remains "+<country code> <area code> <local number>".
trial (2021-04-07 19:40:38+00:00): - yes deleting is a better option.
- "The defined data format remains "+<country code> <area code> <local number>": exactly, area code is empty for France and local number is X XX XX XX XX for France, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries for examples or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.123 for the norm. Display program can also change that.
Becky Candy (2021-05-05 08:21:02+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102442939