piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yasponam (2022-09-05 09:38:17+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect road geometry that was added. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #125805458.
Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
yasponam
Frans S (2021-09-01 13:41:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped
Please pay more attention on squaring of the buildings you map or modify
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110555313
aceman444 (2022-07-18 16:28:05+00:00): Zdravim, netreba vzdy naslepo pocuvat editor iD, niekedy ma zavadzajuce navrhy. Ten nazov Sconto Möbel Sofort je podozrivy, omnoho viac by som verit, ze na budove bude napisane to Sconto Nabytok, ako to bolo povodne.
bxl-forever (2021-09-02 01:04:40+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid there is a problem with this survey.
I know Buissonnets/Braambosjes and Heembeek tram stops very well and there is tactile paving on both those platforms.  Those are the small soft rubber squares in front of the first door of the tram, and they will typically have some white stones for people using white canes.

May I suggest you turn off this quest.  You can easily go to the Settings menu in StreetComplete and turn it off.

Have a nice day.
Uralla (2021-09-03 09:05:26+00:00): Зачем контур реки ломаешь?
RaccoonFederation (2021-09-01 17:32:33+00:00): Let's hope Tesco lorry drivers use OSM data :-)
plymothian (2021-09-01 19:11:35+00:00): Ironically, Ashford Hill was one of the ones I added just 4 hours before the crash happened!
Frans S (2021-09-02 11:01:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate and square mapping.
See also my other comments.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110556860
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-01-10 07:12:42+00:00): Hi varman. Thank you for contributing to OSM. I came across this area. I Found an issue about layer tags in the railway. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/872071312. There's a layer tag without a bridge, based on history you delete the bridge tag but the layer tag still exists. I would like to fix this issue but I am not sure how to fix such an armchair mapper. If you have any other suggestions. Please let me know. 
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30168/task/143786124 
Cheers
_varman_ (2023-01-10 07:38:55+00:00): Hi Riyadi,

Thanks for your message. As far as I can tell, there are no issues with this node. 

The road and rail are on the same layer so no layer changes are required.

The rail line does not touch the nearby bridge, so no bridge tags should be required on the rail line.

Hope that helps!
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-01-10 08:16:54+00:00): thanks for your response varman.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/872071312. 
through the information, you give
the rail and highway in the same layer. so do I delete layer=1 in this case and don't need the bridge tag as you said

it is helpful, I Appreciate that. Happy Mapping
rocky2109 (2021-09-01 10:30:39+00:00): Removed unnecessary noexit tag #MSFTOpenMaps
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Piskvor (2021-09-01 11:19:49+00:00): Jestli je vidět, to asi není podstatný - důležitý je, že tam je ;) Není to spíš fontána?
mueschel (2021-09-09 11:20:53+00:00): Hi,
please check the spelling of keys.

To pick one example, there are several 
"education_government_registere" which should be "education:government_registered".
Peter Agenga (2021-09-09 11:51:42+00:00): Thanks for the correction
woodpeck (2021-09-03 11:32:33+00:00): Hello user with a funny face as username, please stop participating in this edit war. If you believe that there is a problem with this street, please message the DWG. @everyone else, I see what you're trying to do here but it is not good for OSM to give the impression that people can map "invented" names even if it is for a good purpose. We will have to find other ways to detect map plagiarism.
user_14017757 (2021-09-03 17:17:03+00:00): @woodpeck Excuse me? I just deleted the incorrect street name, didn't add it.
cheatach (2021-09-05 15:57:22+00:00): @woodpeck As you may not know, this is another RotaniMile multi account, an user which you once banned yourself. Since then, he has been relentlessly creating new accounts to make erroneous and malicious edits. He is using gaslighting to avoid bans, sabotage the project and to troll the OSM community. Your help to get rid of him efficiently woud be very aprecciated. RicoElectrico has more info about him.
woodpeck (2021-09-05 16:15:54+00:00): cheatach, the DWG has little patience with users who (on purpose) make erroneous and malicious edits. If you can point to any such edits made by the funny-face user or any other account you claim to be a reincarnation of RotaniMile then we're happy to act on that. However this particular edit, the deletion of a non-existent street name, was correct.
Frans S (2021-09-02 11:00:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not map the shadow of a building as part of the building. 
Square your rectangular buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110560327
zorglubu (2021-09-05 13:53:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez semble-t-il fait un import de données dans ce changeset. Tous les nœuds créés ont des attributs qu'ils ne devraient pas avoir, et les géométries de l'existant ou de l'import n'ont pas été reprises pour  assurer la cohérence des emprises.
Les imports sont fortement découragés dans OSM, sauf à respecter des règles très strictes, et en particulier l'accord de la communauté OSM locale.
Votre contribution pourrait pourtant être très profitable à l'amélioration de la carte OSM, je vous propose que nous échangions afin que vous puissiez corriger les différentes erreurs que j'ai relevées.
Bien cordialement.
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:58:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
See my previous comment. 
The shadow next to a building is not a part of the building. Just map the rooflines


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110560909
Frans S (2021-09-01 13:38:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please pay more attention on squaring of the buildings
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110561193
Ltrlg (2021-09-01 15:51:21+00:00): Aucun des deux points ajoutés n’a de tag principal, décrivant de quoi il s’agit. Sans regarder en détail, ça pourrait être n’importe lequel de `shop=*`,`office=*`, `man_made=works`. Ça crée des données que personne (rendu, application de guidage, etc.) ne peut vraiment utiliser.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110561950
GirafonFr (2021-09-01 18:39:31+00:00): En effet, relevé de terrain ce midi. C’est maintenant corrigé.
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:57:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please map more accurate. (your mappings are oversized and not squared)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110562193
pkoby (2021-09-02 00:47:33+00:00): Is this actually named "Not a Track"? Or is it a local tradition? If the latter, would `loc_name=*` be more appropriate? Open to discussion, because I'm not a local.
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:56:47+00:00): Hi. A small remark
Do not map the same building twice.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110564173
L'imaginaire (2021-09-01 15:31:10+00:00): :-)
fvusser (2021-09-01 18:32:05+00:00): Gelieve dit ongedaan te maken: Vanaf 1 augustus 2021 wordt het einde van een fietsstraat niet langer aangeduid met verkeersbord F113. De federale regering schrapt het bord uit de Wegcode. Reden hiervoor: de enorme toename aan fietsstraten en -zones in ons land én de daar bijhorende hoeveelheid verkeersborden. Een fietsstraat eindigt voortaan aan het volgende kruispunt.
s8evq (2021-09-01 20:38:15+00:00): Er staat een "Zone fietsstraat bord" en geen normale F113. Ik ben ter plaatse gaan kijken.
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:55:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not connect buildings to other features or buildings.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110565093
Geogast (2022-05-14 14:31:31+00:00): revertido aqui: 110565524
drazde (2022-07-04 17:23:56+00:00): Perchè hai ripristinato highway=path?
Non è meglio highway=via_ferrata?
Frans S (2021-09-02 10:53:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be more accurate, don't map (small) buildings together as 1 building


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110565948
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-01 13:34:15+00:00): Hi AbarnaD, welcome to OSM.

Why did you change the highway type of the following way? What's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813498670

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
osmviborg (2021-09-01 13:22:57+00:00): Hej. Læs lidt i wiki'en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
vng_me (2021-11-11 11:05:59+00:00): Зачем ставить ref=2 и flats=?? всегда, если номера не известны?

В итоге видим всюду подъезд №2
stillhart (2025-05-26 19:51:47+00:00): kurze frage, ist der https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6180769025 nicht auf der anderen Seite des Dachs?
hanssprenger (2025-05-27 09:29:36+00:00): Stimmt. Danke !
BCNorwich (2021-09-01 14:43:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder is this your company office premises, or can the public visit you here? 
Have you taken over the whole building? If so has Whistles clothes shop ceased trading here? I'm trying to understand how best your presence here should be described in OSM.

Regards Bernard.
Nero Interiors (2021-09-01 15:05:56+00:00): Hi Bernard, 

The company premise is located in here and the public can visit the office. The building is taken over by us. Hope this helps.
BCNorwich (2021-09-02 10:03:16+00:00): Hi, Is the clothes shop Whistles still trading from the building? If the building is of more than one occupancy then the building address should be on the building outline. All other data (multiple businesses) should be on individual POI like Whistles is at the moment.

I think you've made a mistake with building:levels=55, should it be 5 levels?

Regards Bernard.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-10-02 17:26:54+00:00): Is "correct name" really a good description for these changes?
KrzysztZ (2023-10-31 11:41:59+00:00): Przystanek Trzemesna-Granica jest na pewno w zaznaczonym miejscu? Jadąc na rowerze nie widziałem żadnych oznaczeń przystanku w tym miejscu
tkk (2021-11-14 12:09:03+00:00): Zdravim, prosim o lepsi mapovani informacnich ceduli - jmeno ma byt jen jmeno, cislo patri do 'ref' a jmeno NS pripadne do 'description'. Strkat vsechno do 'name' je dost nestastne, upravovat timto zpusobem existujici cedule je zhorsovani kvality dat.

Dekuji tom.k
fukejs (2021-11-15 14:46:59+00:00): Dobrý den.
Děkujeme na mapy.cz za zpětnou vazbu. Určitě nechceme zhoršovat kvalitu dat a polepšíme se.

Souhlasím, že číslo zastavení patří do ref. Trošku problém máme s tím dávat název NS do description, kde může být v podstatě cokoliv a tato informace se tam mezi jiným balastem "ztratí". Ale lepší tag mě nenapadá a vás asi také ne, když dlouhodobě používáte právě description, že?
Připojujete tabule jako členy k relacím typu route pro NS? Z toho by bylo asi nejlépe tahat informaci, k jaké NS dané cedule patří.

Ještě mě napadlo, zda by se pro plný název nehodil tag board:title (uváděný v dokumentaci https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:information=board?uselang=cs), ale obávám se, že spíš ne - je to jen jiný tag, do nějž se píše to samé co do name.

Zdravím,
Jan Fukátko, Mapy.cz
tkk (2021-11-16 10:49:44+00:00): Ano, nic lepsiho asi nemame. Tabule davame do relace dane NS, takze to lze urcite vyuzit. board:title ma byt novejsi nahrada za name ale AFAIK se nepouziva.  Staci takto?
fukejs (2021-11-16 11:35:42+00:00): Stačí, děkuji. Vidím to stejně. Cedule u NS Macocha dáme do pořádku.
tkk (2021-11-16 11:53:31+00:00): Neco jsem uz prosel, ale urcite jsem nenasel vsechno. Hezky den.
abakus_uploader (2021-09-01 22:31:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ivanbranco (2021-09-12 13:58:13+00:00): Hi,

please use good changeset comments ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ), especially while importing something ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13154698 ).
mueschel (2021-09-12 15:42:12+00:00): I just checked the data in detail. There are many areas with very strange geometries (e.g. 1 meter wide rings), many areas overlapping with each other, overlaps with already existing farmlands and so on.

I think this should be reverted, and edited again according to our Import Guidelines 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
ivanbranco (2021-09-13 15:41:15+00:00): Also, is crop=peaes supposed to be crop=pea (all other values fro the crop tag are singular)?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22crop%22%3D%22peaes%22+global&R

What's the meaning of fixme=coursP8 and nb=*?
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-01 13:36:13+00:00): Hi rstit, welcome to OSM.

Is this just a test? 

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
PT-53 (2021-09-02 07:02:32+00:00): Hallo viplavm,
warum ist dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431553/history
 "Privat" und dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431548/history
nicht ?

Führt dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431548/history
wirklich durch dieses Silo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361038862
?

Warum sind diese Wege
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431549/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431552/history
ein driveway und die anderen nicht ?

Grüße
viplavm (2021-09-03 17:41:30+00:00): Hello PT-53, 
I have added access=private to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431553) as it is gated at one end. Please let me know if I am wrong. I will make necessary changes. 
Regards,
viplavm
PT-53 (2021-09-04 07:23:53+00:00): Hallo viplavm, 
so geht das nicht.
Bitte schaue Dir das selbst nochmal an.
Grüße
mueschel (2021-09-04 07:38:20+00:00): This import of data went wrong. 

- there are foreign tags on every object
- there are misspelled 'farmeland' tags on every area
- the geometry of areas can't be right
- the areas overlap with already mapped farmlands
- all the nodes got the same tags as the areas. 

I think this import should be reverted and then can be done again, fixing the data and following the Import Guidelines.
zorglubu (2021-09-09 08:41:03+00:00): I saw the same kind of bad import on the changeset 110560428, and there are really to many corrections to be done. It's sad because the intention of the user is certainly good.
But with no answer from the user, I did a revert.
PT-53 (2021-09-01 15:26:33+00:00): Hallo  viplavm,
ich habe Deine Bearbeitung zurückgesetzt.
Das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640289874/history
reicht vollkommen aus !!!!!
Grüße
viplavm (2021-09-03 17:25:00+00:00): Hello PT-53,
Thanks for correcting my edits. I will make sure to check these issues in my future edits. 
Regards,
viplavm
ToniE (2021-09-02 10:08:00+00:00): Hallo LK28,

willkommen bei OSM.

Was war der Grund, diese Linie zu löschen?

Existiert diese nicht mehr?

Laut Liniennetzplan der VRB existiert diese aber noch.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
LK28 (2021-09-02 13:09:29+00:00): Hallo Toni!
Die Linie 484 existiert in ihrem Zustand seit dem 11.04.2021 nicht mehr. Hierfür wurden die Linien 434 und 111 angepasst,  damit Teile des Fahrweges der Linie 484 noch bedient werden. Diese Linienänderungen habe ich aber noch nicht eingefügt.
Viele Grüße
LK28
ToniE (2021-09-02 14:41:33+00:00): Servus LK28,

danke für die schnelle Antwort.

Mit dem Browser-Editor iD ist das so eine Sache mit dem Editieren von Relationen, speziell bei ÖPNV-Relationen.

die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6580924/history

war mal ein so genannter Route-Master, der die einzelnen Route-Varianten klammert/auflistet. Den hast du gelöscht, viel mehr aber auch nicht.

Die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/75711
war mal eine solche Route-Variante. Deren Straßen und Haltestellen scheinen in der Relation noch drin zu sein, alle anderen Informationen der Relation hast du anscheinend gelöscht - auch das reicht nicht aus, um die Bus-Route komplett zu löschen.

Schau mal auf https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NI/DE-NI-VRB-Analysis.html#bus_484

dort sind noch weitere Route-Varianten zu finden - die Relation 75711 ist hier nicht aufgelistet, da die ref=484, ... nicht mehr in der Relation gelistet ist.

Soll ich die Überreste komplett löschen, oder willst du Teile davon noch als Basis zum Erstellen von 434 und 111 benutzen?

BTW: "iD" im Browser ist nur sehr eingeschränkt nutzbar, wenn es um Relationen geht. Mittelfristig empfehle  ich JOSM (josm.openstreetmap.de), die Einarbeitung dauert zwar etwas, aber dann ... ist das Editiren von Realtion um so einfacher.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
LK28 (2021-09-02 17:16:23+00:00): Hi Toni,
danke für die Tipps, ich bin noch relativ neu in dem Programm, daher der peinliche Fehler. Es wäre nett, wenn du die Überreste komplett löscht, da ich der Meinung bin, den Weg neu anzulegen wäre einfacher, als ihn zu modifizieren. Ich danke dir für deine Mühe!

Viele Grüße
LK28
mueschel (2021-09-12 15:43:10+00:00):     I just checked the data in detail. There are many areas with very strange geometries (e.g. 1 meter wide rings), many areas overlapping with each other, overlaps with already existing farmlands and so on.

    I think this should be reverted, and edited again according to our Import Guidelines
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
jeslop (2021-09-01 15:03:06+00:00): Please consider not making such large change sets (one change in England another, in Guatemala), it becomes very difficult to monitor them. Thank you for your cooperation.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-01 14:37:33+00:00): Please edit EACH changeset for EACH place
flother (2021-09-02 09:41:45+00:00): Could you explain why you deleted a few roads in Beau Bassin-Rose Hill, Mauritius? From the satellite imagery they look like they were legitimate. I'm minded to add them back in unless you say otherwise.
Lee Carré (2021-09-02 21:01:27+00:00): Definitely smaller changeset areas, please.

Also, what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂.
flother (2021-09-06 10:17:40+00:00): I reinstated the roads removed from Beau Bassin-Rose Hill in changeset 110792951.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110792951
mueschel (2021-09-02 08:55:36+00:00): Something went very wrong here. There are hundreds of objects with only foreign tags like this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978448938

Before importing any foreign data, please make sure to follow the OSM import guidelines!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
ivanbranco (2021-09-12 13:56:55+00:00): Don't use OSM for tests.

If you have to test something, use this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

I think this should be reverted:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22ID_UNIQUE_%22%3D*+global&R
mueschel (2021-09-12 15:31:08+00:00): I reverted this and the other 4 changesets.