piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae (2022-12-08 13:29:45+00:00): Buenas tardes.

El nombre del camino según fuentes oficiales (CDAU, Ayuntamiento de Málaga) es «Camino Lagar Juan Salvador». ¿Puede indicar el motivo del cambio?

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
user_17925547 (2022-12-08 13:37:59+00:00): Buenas Daniel,

El letrero de la calle dice "Camino Juan Salvador".

Un saludo,
Coche de la Comarca
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 04:59:40+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 04:59:45+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 04:59:52+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 04:59:57+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 05:00:02+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
eggie (2022-12-08 15:54:21+00:00): Dag Isabell   Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-12-08 13:11:14+00:00): Bạn có thể đưa ra nhận xét về bộ thay đổi tốt hơn không? "Sửa bàn đồ" là việc mà tất cả chúng ta luôn làm! Bạn đang sửa cái gì vậy?

Can you come up with a better changeset comment? "Sửa bàn đồ" is what we all do all the time! What are you fixing? 

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Manuel H (2023-06-15 18:53:48+00:00): Soll die Linie 1120325932 auch ein Wasserlauf sein? Da fehlen die Eigenschaften.
Manuel H (2023-06-15 18:58:35+00:00): ditto 1120325934
Bitte mal kontrollieren, was da noch alles vergessen wurde.
osm-user12 (2023-06-15 19:38:09+00:00): waren nur die beiden. Danke für den Hinweis! gefixt.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-08 13:19:15+00:00): Bạn có thể đưa ra nhận xét về bộ thay đổi tốt hơn không? "Sửa bàn đồ" là việc mà tất cả chúng ta luôn làm! Bạn đang sửa cái gì vậy?

Can you come up with a better changeset comment? "Sửa bàn đồ" is what we all do all the time! What are you fixing?


Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
plennert (2022-12-18 10:58:26+00:00): source = lokales wissen oder vor Ort; Hast Du all die Defis wirklich vor Ort geprüft/erhoben?
Fragende Grüsse
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129860865
plennert (2022-12-20 07:19:05+00:00): Hallo
ich erwarte eine Antwort. Anderenfalls muss ich von einer nicht geprüften Änderung ausgehen und diese revertieren.

Fragende Grüsse
Fijord (2022-12-21 09:50:32+00:00): Hallo plennert
Bitte ein wenig Geduld.
Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Ich war am 21.11.2022 vor Ort und hatte einen Besuch betreffend  Besuch Langlaufloipen und Rettungspunkte mit Loipe-Studen. Gruss Fijord
plennert (2022-12-30 10:32:36+00:00): ok, das erklärt aber noch nicht die Standorte der Defis.
bitte mach kleinere changesets, ist einfacher zu prüfen.
Fijord (2023-01-05 08:23:39+00:00): Hallo plennert
source	Lokales oder allgemeines Wissen.
Gruss Fijord
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 05:00:07+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
marczoutendijk (2022-12-08 13:19:41+00:00): Bạn có thể đưa ra nhận xét về bộ thay đổi tốt hơn không? "Sửa bàn đồ" là việc mà tất cả chúng ta luôn làm! Bạn đang sửa cái gì vậy?

Can you come up with a better changeset comment? "Sửa bàn đồ" is what we all do all the time! What are you fixing?


Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-09 13:08:14+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Pierre Serpe (2022-12-09 19:58:38+00:00): There are some missing traffic signs and direction signs missing in Saint-Georges-sur-Meuse. Therefore the municipality would like to map every existing traffic-signs and streetname board and then install the missing one. I did suggest them to use the 360 image in combination with OSM to update maps with all signs. In OSM, it is possible to add some signs near my place rue Albert 1er 15 and i manage to get something in overpass turbo after a few trials. When i have some signs on top of each other on the same pole, i cannot really map it like that. Instead i made another point next to the first one (and so on if there are more). Do you think it is the best way to do that?
Moreover, i did not find any code for street name signs. Would you know more about that?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 05:00:12+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
ovruni (2022-12-08 20:21:21+00:00): Hola jhonaycachi, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se están agregando edificios sobre otros edificios existentes, ademas de que se continúan agregando nombres descriptivos.
Saludos
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-09 13:08:10+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Pierre Serpe (2022-12-09 20:07:53+00:00): There are some missing traffic signs and direction signs missing in Saint-Georges-sur-Meuse. Therefore the municipality would like to map every existing traffic-signs and streetname board and then install the missing one. I did suggest them to use the 360 image in combination with OSM to update maps with all signs. In OSM, it is possible to add some signs near my place rue Albert 1er 15 and i manage to get something in overpass turbo after a few trials. When i have some signs on top of each other on the same pole, i cannot really map it like that. Instead i made another point next to the first one (and so on if there are more). Do you think it is the best way to do that?
Moreover, i did not find any code for street name signs. Would you know more about that?
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-10 06:01:10+00:00): Thanks for the answer. Unfortunately, I don't know anything about mapping street name or traffic signs.

#HappyMapping
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 05:00:17+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
marczoutendijk (2022-12-08 13:19:27+00:00): Bạn có thể đưa ra nhận xét về bộ thay đổi tốt hơn không? "Sửa bàn đồ" là việc mà tất cả chúng ta luôn làm! Bạn đang sửa cái gì vậy?

Can you come up with a better changeset comment? "Sửa bàn đồ" is what we all do all the time! What are you fixing?


Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-27 05:00:22+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised sources: changeset/131756201
ovruni (2022-12-08 20:26:18+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado nombres descriptivos, objetos sobre otros objetos existentes, etiquetas incorrectas, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
silversurfer83 (2022-12-09 08:07:17+00:00): Habe ich wieder gelöscht.

Bitte hör auf falsche Daten in die Datenbank zu schreiben. Die Funktion von Organic Maps, die Du nutzt ist KEINE persönliche Notizfunktion.
Alouette955 (2023-01-14 20:14:51+00:00): Your modification remove new cycleway created months ago on Rennaissance and connexion to Route Verte. Why?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-15 12:12:37+00:00): Can you precise where the cycling path is missing on Rue de la Renaissance? I just checked and it is there all along. It has been drawn separately since there is a curb between the road and the cycling path.
Alouette955 (2023-01-15 16:19:16+00:00): Puisque vous êtes de Poly Montréal je me permets de répondre en français. J'ai intégré la nouvelle piste cyclable par le groupe de modification 127308092 . La nouvelle piste cyclable est plutôt sur Bas-Ste-Thérèse (mes excuses la rue change de nom au viaduc). Elle commence un peu au sud du viaduc, chemins  674530019, 951232237, 1101845641 et 1101845640. De plus 2 nouvelles pistes asphaltées relient la route verte à cette nouvelle voie. Voir ce lien qui montre approximativement les nouvelles voies effacées. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z13r8yEYUkTROPdakw9dl_4Tene2COxr/view?usp=sharing). Désolé je n'ai plus la trace qui m'a permis de créer ces pistes.
Alouette955 (2023-01-15 16:25:26+00:00): Les deux chemins effacées sont 1102632715 et 1102632709 qui étaient en version v1
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-15 18:53:04+00:00): OK, je vois, je regarderais au nord de l'A640.

Désolé si j'ai effacé une piste à cet endroit, il se peut que je sois allé trop vite! Je vais corriger du mieux que je peux!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-15 19:21:46+00:00): C'est corrigé. J'ai mis geometry approximate en attendant les nouvelle photos aériennes.
NorthCrab (2022-12-09 00:22:24+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.
Takie barierki https://i.imgur.com/2T6EELe.png możemy oznaczyć jako Railing https://i.imgur.com/enbwuRS.png
Andrea Musuruane (2022-12-08 15:10:15+00:00): Ciao. Questo edit è palesemente errato. Due edificio attaccati tra di loro non possono essere building=detached. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129862219
ivanbranco (2022-12-08 15:46:40+00:00): Hi cantece,

at least 3 users asked you already do add meaningful changeset descriptions this year (and many many other questions as well https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15908). 

Could you follow the advice? Thanks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
RedAuburn (2023-02-12 10:43:04+00:00): thank you for the update! just fyi, it's good practice to use lifecyle prefixes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) when marking a POI as closed

in this case, the correct tagging would be was:name=Andrew Martin, disused:shop=paint
TheUKHighStreet (2023-02-12 15:29:18+00:00): Thanks - more recently I have been using old_name to mark closed shops. Is was:name preferable to old_name? Or does it not matter?
RedAuburn (2023-02-12 16:06:54+00:00): old_name is fine too :)
TheUKHighStreet (2023-02-12 17:47:03+00:00): Great - thanks very much.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-08 15:42:54+00:00): Dear okolobasik,

I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129865934 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Russian–Ukrainian_war). Please refrain from mapping in Ukraine for the time being.

I also ask you to write more informative changeset comments. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for the relevant documentation.
Digital-line (2022-12-08 15:42:43+00:00): et correction de noms avec ajout de la source
ynx (2023-02-20 20:34:50+00:00): А что за Личность тут отмечена? Если это ГБУ Личность, то такого адреса у них нет: https://%D0%B3%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C.%D1%80%D1%84/contactsxn--90adqllgvid6b7c.xn--p1aiD0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C.%D1%80%D1%84/contacts/
Andrea Musuruane (2022-12-08 15:27:36+00:00): Ciao. Anche queste modifiche non vanno bene. Gli edifici "detached" sono edifici isolati che non hanno lati in comune con altri. E non è il caso di quelli che hai etichettato in questo changeset. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129863284
JasmineRanasinghe (2022-12-22 12:15:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
eggie (2022-12-08 15:27:51+00:00): Dag PJJ  Je vraagt feedback.

Paaltjes kunnen eigenlijk nooit midden op een kruising staan. Dat kan niet kloppen.
motor_vehicle=no is default en hoort niet op een paaltje.
motorcycle moped en mofa = yes is dus wel nodig.

Maar waar staan de paaltjes precies?
Welk bord staat vooraan bij de brug?
Die motorfiets kiomt wel voorbij het eerste paaltje, maar de routering stopt bij het tweede. Daar ontbreekt motorcycle = moped= en mofa = yes 
MVG
eggie
Vestrin (2022-12-08 15:42:24+00:00): De paaltjes stonden al zo op de kaart, ik had geen idee dat die zo niet kloppen. Maar om het te verduidelijken: de paaltjes (of beter gezegd het paaltje, want die aan de zuidkant is al een tijdje weg), staat aan de noordkant van de brug, op de scheiding brugdek - wegdek. 
Aan beide kanten van de brug staan geen borden die verkeer toestaan of verbieden, het paaltje is de enige fysieke beperking.

Groeten,

PJJvStrien
eggie (2022-12-08 15:45:19+00:00): Ik heb de paaltjes verplaatst.
'Fout' van voorgaande mapper. 
De voorgaande mapper had van wandelknooppunt 11 een paaltje gemaakt. Knooppunt heb ik hersteld. Paaltje opgeschoven. 
access=no is bijna altijd fout icm met andere tagging. iets om te onthouden. Ik heb access=no verwijderd van een wegdeel.. net als al die defaulttagging. Die hoeven niet op wegen.
Op de paaltjes staan nu wel de jusite tags hoewel foot en bicycle=yes eigenlijk niet nodig zijn. Ook default.

Best lastig al die accesstagging om onder de knie te krijgen.

Het zal nu gewoon routeren hier voor alle gemotoriseerde tweewielers incl motorfietsen en niet voor auto's.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-08 15:50:34+00:00): Onze berichten kruisten elkaar.

Het zuidelijke paaltje heb ik dan nu verwijderd zoals jij aangeeft, maar op zich merkwaardig want nu routeert de brug tot de noordoever voor motorcar?
Denk een berichtje naar de Gemeente wel verstandig is. 
Ze hebben vast een website om iets te melden.
Op 21 -4 2022 stond het zuidelijke paaltje er nog. Ik gebruik OBLIEK foto's van Slagboom&Peeters. 
Die zijn haarscherp.
Maar ik denk dat het zo aardig klopt.
Groet
eggie
Vestrin (2022-12-08 15:53:07+00:00): Top dankjewel. Ik liep er vorig weekend nog langs en toen stond het zuidelijke paaltje er niet 😂. Ik heb wel contacten daar om het aan te kaarten
eggie (2022-12-08 16:02:24+00:00): Oke... mocht het paaltje terugkomen dan kun je gewoon de tagging kopiëren van het noordelijke paaltje naar de node op de scheiding brug /wegdeel. .
Groet
eggie
Jrachi (2022-12-12 20:09:08+00:00): cai_scale si applica solo alle relazioni non ai sentieri
eggie (2022-12-08 15:14:26+00:00): Hi Jona...  Now the Chomicha is twice on de the map?
Chomicha was already on the map.
For what purpose?

Greetz,
eggie
Jona_ (2022-12-08 16:11:20+00:00): Sorry, my map data (Osmand) wasn't up to date. Then you can ignore my last update!
eggie (2022-12-08 16:14:42+00:00): Oke.. no problem.. I removed the duplicated tagging.
Greetz,
eggie
gektor1488 (2022-12-11 14:40:27+00:00): please, do not map military objects during the war in Ukraine
eggie (2022-12-08 15:05:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. We taggen in OSM alleen op de adresnode. Dus de dubbel getagde info kan weer van de gebouwomtrek af.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-08 15:09:40+00:00): Dubbele info heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Lots of Lotte (2022-12-09 11:32:13+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Super, bedankt voor je bericht en tips + links. Ik ben net begonnen met OSM dus is nog even uitzoeken hoe alles werkt, maar ik zal de tips en links bekijken! 
MVG,
Lotte
gektor1488 (2022-12-11 14:41:08+00:00): please, do not map military objects during the war in Ukraine
map per (2022-12-22 12:10:48+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":
Sieht gut aus, danke!
LockOnGuy (2022-12-08 16:32:29+00:00): Hello Friendly_Ghost,      
Thank you for mapping in Iraq.      
I noticed you removed the phone number for the Iraqi post and said that it is "invalid format" in the changeset comment, but the number was correct its a number we call in Iraq, Iraqi companies have 4 digit phone number that they can get and government agencies numbers are 3 digits only. You can see the Iraq post number here: https://post.iq/en/%d8%aa%d9%88%d8%a7%d8%b5%d9%84-%d9%85%d8%b9%d9%86%d8%a7/#:~:text=%D8%A8%D8%BA%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%8A-,5512,-info%40post.iq         
What do you recommend doing?     
Best Regards my friend.
LockOnGuy (2022-12-08 16:47:19+00:00): Hi again,      
I tried to call the number with the country code so I called +9645512 and the lady computer said "the phone is unknown" then I called without the country code just 5512 and the Iraqi post answer machine answered me.      
Since we can not add the country code I went to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone to see what can we do, and I guess maybe "phone:IQ=5512", what do you think? Thanks again.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-08 17:04:10+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy. Thank you for the feedback and input. "phone:IQ=5512" sounds like an interesting idea, although I am concerned that:

1) This is the phone number of the brand. With this number you will not be connected to an employee at a specific location. On the US Slack I have already heard some reluctance when it comes to tagging all possible "brand:*=*" tags, and while this is not the USA, we can still consider the argument against adding all these brand details.

2) "phone:IQ=*" and similar are currently undocumented. We can document it, of course, but I doubt it will get much attention from users and may not be worth the effort even if we manage to promote it a bit.
LockOnGuy (2022-12-08 17:22:53+00:00): Hello, I do agree with you here.       
The reason I added the numbers in the first place is so people can call the post office to get their mail/parcel, I know this sound weird to you and yes it kinda does but after 2003 (the invasion) there were no new road signs to put because factories who made them got bombed and we can not put new address signs, etc.... long story, so now let's say I want to buy things from AliExpress I have to put my phone number in the address 2 line so when the parcel arrives they call me to pick it up since they don't deliver to homes after 2003, some people don't have their number in the mail so they call the number and ask if there is a mail for them to come and collect. And this was the reason for me to put it in "Phone" so it can be shown in maps apps, see: https://i.ibb.co/jDryrVm/image.png       
So now, even if we put it in "phone:IQ=*" it won't show in the apps I guess and that will be not helpful either, I guess we can live without them I guess.         
Sorry for the long story and have a great evening my friend.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-08 20:39:23+00:00): That's interesting. I had no idea. I would say that if the phone number is relevant for business and logistics on a local level, then the tag is valid enough. I removed it because I had the impression that it would direct you to a national call center where employees have no idea of what's going on at individual branches, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.

With that said, would you like me to put the phone tag back onto the post offices?
LockOnGuy (2022-12-09 00:34:44+00:00): Good morning dear friend,      
      
"phone number is relevant for business and logistics on a local level"      
      Absolutely and I do agree with this point.    
      
"would you like me to put the phone tag back onto the post offices?" 
      No, I guess. Because if we put it in the "phone" tag that number must be reachable by any caller worldwide, so if we want to add it back it must be in the "phone:IQ" tag and this will not help because it won't show in the phone info for apps that use OSM data.        
      
      What I think is best to do is to get the actual mobile phone or landline numbers for each branch so it will be 1-relevant and 2-world-wide reachable. Every couple of months or so I usually pass by the street where the main office is located, maybe I can go and ask for mobile phone numbers or at least get the landline numbers in the worst case, unfortunately, %99 of landline phones in Iraq is no longer working after 2003 because the landline telephone exchange was bombed during the invasion, so it must be mobile phone numbers I believe.        
Anyway. Thank you for your excellent explanations, good talk to you sir.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-09 02:07:12+00:00): > get the actual mobile phone or landline numbers for each branch so it will be 1-relevant and 2-world-wide reachable

This would be the best outcome.

> maybe I can go and ask for mobile phone numbers or at least get the landline numbers

Maybe if you're lucky they have an index of their phone numbers of each branch and maybe they're willing to share it. In that case you can decide with other local mappers if that's good enough to "import", meaning to tag it without visiting or calling all branches for confirmation. 
The main concern and criterium here would be how up-to-date it is, especially if they still list landline numbers that are now out of use.

> Thank you for your excellent explanations, good talk to you sir.

My pleasure. I'm always open for a constructive discussion on how to improve OSM data :)
LockOnGuy (2022-12-09 02:13:07+00:00): > The main concern and criterium here would be how up-to-date it is.     
    simply by calling the number and speak with them to confirm the number is working and for that exact branch :) 
Thanks and have a great day!
ovruni (2022-12-09 00:37:19+00:00): Hola evkalina, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "fix park", sin embargo se ha retirado el area residencial, el nodo del pueblo, el parque, se han agregado varios nombres de vias, las cuales ademas tienen abreviaturas. "Jr." [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)
ovruni (2022-12-09 00:41:30+00:00): Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
opendcc (2023-03-14 19:55:34+00:00): Wieso wurde das gelöscht - es steht immer noch unverändert da ?!
ausup_ (2023-03-14 21:18:18+00:00): Tut mir Leid, das wurde versehentlich getan! Kannst du das bitte zurückstellen?
opendcc (2023-03-14 21:48:30+00:00): Schon erledigt.
eggie (2022-12-08 16:13:15+00:00): Dag Lots.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
grpet
eggie
JasmineRanasinghe (2022-12-22 12:15:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-10 10:26:28+00:00): bonjour,
si c'est bien la mairie, je dirais plutôt amenity=townhall non ?
opendcc (2023-03-10 16:20:53+00:00): Woher kommt die Firma Helsing? Vor Ort nachgesehen?
jambamkin (2023-03-27 16:20:47+00:00): Hi Mike, You seeem to have drawn a line on the map but not added any tags. for things to be visible on the map they need to have tags. What were you adding here?
James
eggie (2022-12-08 22:36:25+00:00): Isabell.. 
Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je die weg vastgeplakt heb met de residential van dit stadsgedeelte.
Ik heb het losgemaakt.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen. (en goed inzoomen)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-08 22:36:50+00:00): Je edits even voor de duidelijkheid https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129867247
Patr1k_P (2022-12-13 21:36:37+00:00): Ahoj popis zatiaľ nezmapovane neni moc ideálny a ničomu nenapovie..lepšie keď vždy napíšeš čo si pridal, alebo upravil.. Napr. pridaná info tabula, pridaná cesta, posed atď..
vladosaro (2022-12-17 09:25:21+00:00): Ahoj OK sedí vec, prišlo mi to logické, keďže popis sa viaže k danému objektu, ale nevadí, polepším sa. ..a ešte; Klerik7 má aj nejaké klasické civilné meno? Príde mi to osobne také nijaké komunikovať s nejakým pseudonymom, aj ked áno, máš na to výsostné právo. Tiež by som mohol použiť napr. "docent" a pod., ako ma nazvali moji spolužiaci, ale načo? Nehanbím sa za svoje meno.
Tak teda "domapovania" 😉
jeslop (2022-12-08 19:25:51+00:00): Hola YZFPEUEIWM. Bienvenido a OSM.
Si quieres seguir editando, trata de leer esto primero: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Esta primera edición está incorrecta, no hay ningún edificio ahí, no es visible en ninguna imagen de satélite ni figura en catastro. Lo revierto.

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2023-02-10 06:00:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863297517/history
Kompletna nieprawda
aceman444 (2024-10-23 22:28:02+00:00): To forester's_lodge je hrozne. Co s tym urobime?