piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-03-07 15:47:23+00:00): Ik draai het voorlopig terug.... 
Je zou het bij de Gemeente kunnen navragen wat de bedoeling is. 
Duidelijke bebording ontbreekt. 
het blijft onduidelijk. 
reverted by changeset #81902418
MVG,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Dimacn (2020-03-06 03:46:46+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте на карту несуществующие объекты. Речь идёт про ваш парк отдыха "Аллея строителей". Нет такой аллеи, и парка отдыха тоже. Трава с деревьями - это ещё не парк отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите.
eggie (2020-03-06 07:50:30+00:00): Ook hier onduidelijke bebording. 
Dat zal best.
Het fietspad aan de noordzijde van de fietsafslag naar de Osdorperweg is tweerichting. Net als die afslag zelf. 
Waarom zou de Plesmanlaan anders tweerichting zijn op het fietspad? Waarom het dan toch weer op eenrichting zetten? De routering is nu volledig zoek.
Er staat hier zelfs een stippel-belijning in het midden op de wegas. Ik haal de oneway weer weg.
Dat de bebording niet klopt (er had moeten worden aangegeven dat het tweerichting is), is een feit.
Soms is pragmatisch mappen beter. 
Geef het door aan de gmeente via de website en kijk eens welk antwoord ze geven. Daar ben ik dan benieuwd naar. 
Laat het antwoord maar weten tegen die tijd. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 07:58:38+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #81857132
Staat er aan de noordzijde een bord "Verboden in te rijden"? Voor zover ik weet niet of de Gemeente moet dat later geplaatst hebben en dat lijkt me dan heel wonderlijk.
Dimacn (2020-03-06 03:38:52+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите добавленные вами парки отдыха во дворах.
Viclicioso (2020-03-10 19:30:15+00:00): Hola mundo
Viclicioso (2020-03-10 19:30:58+00:00): Necesito amigos, toy loco
Günther Lütjens (2020-03-10 19:31:04+00:00): Borra eso
user_5359 (2020-03-06 04:51:30+00:00): Hallo! Bitte beachte den Unterschied zwischen einer „Fußgängerzone“ (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian) und einen „Fußweg" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)
MKnight (2020-03-07 09:26:54+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier Gebäude über die ganzen Flächen gezeichnet, also incl. Innenhöfe/ Gärten etc.
Das ist fürn Anfang erstmal besser als garnix, aber entspricht nicht der Realität.

Desweiteren sind bei den Gebäuden diverse Überlappungen.

Möchtest Du das korrigieren?

Siehe auch http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=16&lat=51.10965&lon=11.00027&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=0000%2C0001&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
czubi (2020-03-21 09:07:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82407581?xhr=1#map=16/51.1086/11.0017&layers=N
roptat (2020-03-06 01:34:21+00:00): Hey there, congrats on your first edits!

A small note though, your change doesn't seem to make sense (the wiki doesn't know what a crossing=stop_sign is). What did you intend to map exactly? Let me know if I can help!
maro21 (2020-03-07 01:20:21+00:00): You mentioned Wiki, but Wiki says that indoor=corridor is used on areas, not ways.
CRCulver (2020-03-07 02:09:50+00:00): Further changes are coming.
roptat (2020-03-06 01:43:06+00:00): Great job! It would be even better if you could add the type of shops, and not only the name. It makes them easier to find if you're looking for an ice cream, say :)

Select the store in the editor, and on the left panel, click on the arrow that goes to the left (at the top of the panel). Then type "ice cream" or "supermarket". Select the correct type of shop and you're all set!
user_5359 (2020-03-06 04:48:50+00:00): Hallo! Du hast den Adressknoto https://www.osm.org/node/2719500473 um mehr als 100m verschoben. Könntest Du bitte prüfen, ob das seine Richtigkeit hat? 
Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass Du anscheinend Grundstückgrenzen mit building=yes kennzeichnest. dieser Schlüssel gehört nur das das Gebäude direkt.
user_5359 (2020-03-07 10:01:42+00:00): *nur das das Gebäude direkt* -> nur an das Gebäude direkt 
siehe auch https://www.osm.org/changeset/81843708
czubi (2020-03-21 09:07:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82407581?xhr=1#map=16/51.1086/11.0017&layers=N
roptat (2020-03-06 02:13:51+00:00): I believe there is no stop sign on that side of the road, as shown in the imagery. Have you been there yourself? Thank you :)
4class (2020-03-06 02:37:45+00:00): They are very new to the area , they have only been up about a month.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-06 01:52:38+00:00): corrected description: full revert of 80880972, unnecessary splitting of rivers, DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
roptat (2020-03-06 02:18:45+00:00): Make sure to square the buildings. You can right-click on the building and select the squaring tool for that (angles must already be near 90° for it to work). I've already done that for you :)
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:10:14+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to CUSTOMERS. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
panchis1 (2021-02-15 09:32:33+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99296476). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
panchis1.
NoNameX (2020-04-06 21:56:22+00:00): Hello AjBelnuovo,

I have spend a lot of time to add the landuse = residendal in this area.

Why have you deleted all landuse = residendal entries in this area ?

From DeepL:
Tenho gasto muito tempo para adicionar o uso do landuse = residencial nesta área.

Por que você apagou todas as entradas de uso do landuse = residencial nesta área ?

Melhores Cumprimentos

NoNameX
AjBelnuovo (2020-04-06 22:13:47+00:00): Porque há uma forma correta de colocar o limite da cidade , de forma que quando se faça necessário fazer correções dentro destes limites ela não é atrapalhada pela coloração  amarela que fica todo o espaço.
NoNameX (2020-04-07 00:38:28+00:00): I´am sorry, but I cannot understand what you are meaning.

From my point of view, the landuses from my side have been 100 percent OK.

So please explain me with these two samples (which you have deleted), what is is wrong in your opinion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788667969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788667972

If you think, that they are wrong, than please  correct the samples, so I can see your improvment. Deleting is for sure not an improvment.

By the way:
If you take a look to your changes, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766783703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766789177

there are now overlapping landuses with lakes and farmlands, which has not been before.

So I cannot see any improvment from your side by your changes.


From DeepL
Sinto muito, mas não consigo entender o que você está querendo dizer.

Do meu ponto de vista, os terrenos do meu lado têm estado 100% bem.

Então, por favor me explique com estas duas amostras (que você apagou), o que está errado em sua opinião.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788667969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788667972

Se você acha, que eles estão errados, então por favor, corrija as amostras, para que eu possa ver a sua melhoria. Excluir não é, com certeza, uma melhoria.

A propósito:
Se você der uma olhada nas suas mudanças, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766783703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766789177

agora há sobreposição de terrenos com lagos e terras agrícolas, o que não acontecia antes.

Portanto, não consigo ver nenhuma melhoria do seu lado pelas suas mudanças.
AjBelnuovo (2020-04-07 02:15:56+00:00): No link https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-4.36810/-70.18427 

que me enviou , os alguns dos edifícios que lá foram colocados , na imagem que tenho , não existem . Há uma área designada como Arbustos , pra mim seria Zona Úmida e a área designada como Lavoura pela região , seria Mata Nata Nativa .
Como fiz umas 800 alterações no desafio do https://maproulette.org/dashboard não me lembro de todas , mas em todas que encontrei uma delimitação que no ID torna a imagem amarelada e as removi .
NoNameX (2020-04-07 19:20:04+00:00): Ok, I have repaired the missing landuse=residental and the self intersection of the multipolygons with the changset 83214352.

In JOSM with the error checker I did not get any error. 

And also in ID I cannot see any error. 

It´s a relation/multipolygon with the attribute landuse=residental which has the colour yellow in ID.

Everything looks OK from my side. From my point of view, there is no need to delete this kind of information.

Ok, eu consertei o landuse=residental e a auto-incrustação dos multipolígonos com o conjunto 83214352.

No JOSM com o verificador de erros eu não recebi nenhum erro. 

E também no ID eu não consigo ver nenhum erro. 

É uma relação/multipolígono com o atributo landuse=residental que tem a cor amarela no ID.

Tudo parece OK do meu lado. Do meu ponto de vista, não há necessidade de apagar este tipo de informação.
AjBelnuovo (2020-04-07 21:05:15+00:00): No ID , para mim , o amarelado aparece , mas no caso não me impede de fazer correções nas vias . Pra mim , este limite não abrange totalmente a área residencial ,e em alguns extremos há residências fora dela .
Agora inclui igrejas , nomeei vias e removi abreviações .
AjBelnuovo (2020-04-08 22:45:58+00:00): É este tipo de amarelado que removo para poder fazer alteração na via : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-15.83159/-48.13519
orthocircular (2021-09-03 20:22:40+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your contributions. I see you modified the city limits here, were you using an authoritative source for that boundary or just following the forest?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81847127
Warin61 (2020-03-09 21:32:40+00:00): Hi,
Relation 10790614 -farmland and scrub looks to have several problems? An outer that is inside an outer. Covers some water ... with scrub? And having both scrub and farmland as primary tags... rather confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:45+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7271024330/history
user_5359 (2020-03-06 14:24:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
MartinKausO (2020-06-24 21:57:52+00:00): Hallo Crosswalks, wie kommst Du dazu dort einen Zebrastreifen einzuzeichnen? Dort ist kein Fußgängerüberweg!...
MartinKausO (2020-06-24 21:59:42+00:00): Sorry: smartias
smartias (2020-06-25 17:56:01+00:00): Hallo JohnnyDoes,
keine Ahnung, was mich da geritten hat.
Ich versuche den Zebrastreifen mal zu löschen.
Danke für den Hinweis.
smartias (2020-06-25 18:01:23+00:00): Doch, mir fällt es wieder ein: Nachdem ich gerade den Zebrastreifen gelöscht habe, kam die Warnung, dass der Radweg die Straße kreuzt. Damals habe ich keine andere Lösung gesehen. Wie ist denn das korrekte Vorgehen? Die Warnung "ignorieren"? Der Zebrastreifen ist aktuell noch eingemalt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
user_5359 (2020-03-06 14:24:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
nevw (2020-03-06 08:16:52+00:00): Hi
You need to also delete the tag proposed=residential if the road is now built
Yuniq (2020-03-06 09:01:55+00:00): Thanks for that spot nevw; fixed in 81859961
evo_evz (2021-12-15 15:15:36+00:00): Re: fixme.  I could not see any signposts with the name of this way from Sunbeam Ave in the north to Garrigarrang in the south
Juan Carlos G F (2020-03-09 13:08:14+00:00): He arreglado un problema de duplicación de nodos en este conjunto, en la povlación de Olba, concretamente en un sendero.
He detectado este error mediante la opción de "nodos huerfanos" en el validador de osmose.openstreetmap.fr

Conjunto de datos de la correción: #81964879
Mar4s (2020-03-06 13:04:22+00:00): Dobrý den,

Chtěl bych se zeptat, zda #Mapy.cz v popisu changesetu znamená, že mapujete pro Mapy.cz? 

Díky,
M.
Pan Perníček (2020-03-06 13:29:34+00:00): Dobrý den,

Hashtag #Mapy.cz uvádíme v rámci organizované aktivity uvedené na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities. Snažíme se podle svých možností a podle pravidel OSM přispívat k vylepšení Openstreetmap. Pro další informace bude nejlépe kontaktovat koordinátora projektu.
Mar4s (2020-03-06 14:56:22+00:00): Díky za odpověď! Podle hashtagu jsem měl podezření, zda nepoužíváte mapy / ortofoto ze serveru mapy.cz jako podklady. 

Pokud ne, všechno je v pořádku :-)

Příjemné mapování!
user_5359 (2020-03-06 14:24:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-11 09:34:19+00:00): Hello again ClaudDadur,
It looks like you are importing data from an external source here.  Please ensure that you read the links from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the instructions there.  Separately to this you still haven't replied to any of the questions at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1881751 and so people have been reverting your changes.  They'll continue to do that with unless you reply.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-11 09:34:44+00:00): Привет еще раз, КлаудДадур,
Похоже, вы импортируете данные из внешнего источника здесь. Пожалуйста, убедитесь, что вы читаете ссылки с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import и следуйте там инструкциям. Отдельно к этому вы до сих пор не ответили ни на один из вопросов по адресу http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1881751, и поэтому люди отменяют ваши изменения. Они будут продолжать делать это, если вы не ответите.
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени Рабочей группы OSM по данным.
Warin61 (2020-04-12 00:40:19+00:00): Reverted. Copyright source without permission.
gormur (2020-05-10 12:02:05+00:00): Hei Kol Jørn :)
Ser du har tegnet inn masse båtruter...
Men litt usikker på hensikten med noen av dem. F.eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778781089 og de tre andre ved siden av. De er tagget helt likt og går samme plass. Er det noe tanke med det? Eller bare kopiert fra noen plass?
sorcrosc (2020-03-14 15:08:02+00:00): Per favore non mettere gli indirizzi sulle vie ma piuttosto sui nodi in prossimità dell'ingresso (sui cancelli normalmente). Inoltre dovresti mettere i nomi per esteso in modo che corrispondano a quelli delle vie.
Ho già modificato quelli di questo gruppo di modifiche.
Ciao

Lorenzo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-13 17:24:25+00:00): What gives?  Have you recently been on this road? It's still very much under construction and OklaDOT is still asking people to avoid it.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-14 00:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82184305 where the changeset comment is: Still under construction.
vsahith (2020-03-16 05:00:45+00:00): Hi Baloo,

Apologies for the incorrect edit. I missed to check the construction tag and have edited the road according to the available imagery. Thanks for reverting the changeset.

Regards,
vsahith.
DD1GJ (2020-03-06 09:50:37+00:00): Hallo thomy3k, die angegebene Quelle ist, wie alle amtlichen Geodaten des Landes Hessen, urheberrechtlich geschützt und damit für OSM tabu. Da die Verwendung unzulässiger Quellen dem Projekt sehr schaden kann, habe ich diesen Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt.
ma-rt-in (2020-03-06 10:30:04+00:00): Hallo,
welche Anpassung soll das hier den sein? Es war berist alles entsprechend gemappt.
vg
silence2001 (2020-03-06 12:35:14+00:00): Leider nicht. Das kurze Stück zur Einfahrt in die Große Bergstraße war anders gemapt als die Große Bergstraße an sich. Diese Abweichung führt in den OSM Daten dazu, dass die Busse falsch geroutet werden und nicht in die Große Bergstraße einfahren können. Ich habe leider noch nicht so ganz raus, was genau in den Daten dazu führt, daß Busse einige Bereiche befahren können und andere wiederum nicht, obwohl die Straßen und Wege dafür freigegeben sind. Als Absolute Beginner hat man in OSM leider wenig Möglichkeiten, sich entsprechend zu informieren, weil es leider nur sehr weit verstreute und lückenhafte Dokumentationen gibt. Oder ich bin zu blind um sie zu finden. Vg
ma-rt-in (2020-03-06 12:45:03+00:00): Also es gibt keine in der hinsicht von Zugangsbeschränkungen keine lückenhafte Doku, schau mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Ich habe das mal angepasst wieder und etwas vereinfert.
Yuniq (2020-03-06 09:02:27+00:00): Removed a tag that I forgot to remove in 81855378
user_5359 (2020-03-06 14:36:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
LM060024 (2020-03-10 10:21:09+00:00): #LM060 - modifica del numero civico
Connecticut (2020-03-15 15:21:13+00:00): zum Haus mit der Adresse "Peugen 3" kommt man nur mit dem Fahrrad? Nicht mit dem Auto? Bist dir da sicher?
mapper_kf (2020-03-17 10:50:12+00:00): Diese Einstellung habe ich nicht geändert. Habe diese Weg lediglich bis zum Schlofferweg bearbeitet...
Ich bearbeite auch gleich diesen Weg
lmagreault (2020-04-05 10:15:19+00:00): Il s'agit de quel type d'entreprise ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81860431
Alexandre148025 (2020-04-05 11:23:53+00:00): production de vidéos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81860431
ID`s (2020-03-06 13:11:01+00:00): Такой name= не желательно добавлять. Тегов адреса и улицы достаточно. А ещё лучше создавать отношение улицы type=associatedStreet
EliaGiada (2020-03-10 10:18:36+00:00): LM076
A67-A67 (2020-03-10 18:51:17+00:00): Hallo Jaap,

De straatnaam van A326 is Wezelpad binnen de gemeente Wijchen volgens het Nationaal Wegenbestand. Het wegnummer A326 staat al in de ref-tag. Ik heb de straatnaam hersteld.
frosm (2020-03-06 10:45:54+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pourriez-vous svp mettre une description de votre contribution ? RAS n'est pas très collaboratif pour une contribution à un projet collaboratif.
par ailleurs, on ne met pas de coordonées personnelles dans osm. exit donc des infos comme le prénom et nom de qui habite à un endroit.
et le nom d'un batiment dans osm est un vrai nom pour les rares batiments qui en ont un. "maison" n'est pas un nom, c'est un mot qui se decrit avec l'attribut bâtiment
frosm (2020-03-06 10:52:09+00:00): ce sont vraiement des maisons d'habitation ? cela a l'air d'etre des batiments agricoles
si vous l'ignorez, vous pouvez mettre un batiment générique
Blueberry (2020-03-07 15:43:21+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OSM mais merci de ne pas poursuivre vos dégradations

Eric [Blueberry]
maraf24 (2021-02-08 20:27:15+00:00): //Import bez weryfikacji.
frosm (2020-03-06 10:57:48+00:00): le batiment auchan en plein groenland est pure vandalisme. merci d'éviter cela.
un bosquet n'est pas un parc où on peux se promener.
pour un arbre remarquable, vous pouvez crée un point avec toutes les infos
Bentogen (2020-03-06 15:17:30+00:00): Hey Martin,
to have it easier to review your changeset: pls upload changesets which have a smaller area.
habi (2020-03-06 21:44:35+00:00): If you add 'access=private' to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778804435 (like you did) then there's no need to name it 'Piscine privée', as you shouldn't use this tag to describe the things: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
habi (2020-03-06 21:52:56+00:00): The 'Salle de Sport' (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123026564) should probably be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
frosm (2020-03-06 11:00:02+00:00): poure vandalisme, hélas
habi (2020-03-06 21:41:22+00:00): I don't think there's a parking, a supermarket and a gas station on the pack ice in the arctic. Please only add features to the map that are really on the ground.
habi (2020-03-06 21:49:03+00:00): I removed the features with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81885439
Colin Smale (2020-03-06 13:06:41+00:00): Unfortunately you haven't corrected anything, you only made the error message go away; you have not made the admin boundaries correct. That's the danger of armchair mapping - you didn't know which boundary was correct so you removed one. It was the wrong one.
frosm (2020-03-06 11:04:43+00:00): vandalisme ici aussi : le bâtiment commercial en plein groenland, une piscine de 5m derrière une maison me semble un petite pour piscine municipale
habi (2020-03-06 21:38:18+00:00): You've now made five changesets, all with the comment 'RAS'. Please add a meaningful changeset comment to show what you did, as suggested here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
frosm (2020-03-06 11:10:19+00:00): qu'est-ce que c'est l'agrandisement piscine https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778807735 ?
vous l'avez décrit comme le bassin de piscine et pas piscine à la fois.
c'est une partie du batiment qui contient un bassin de la piscine ?
user_1566574 (2020-05-05 21:40:47+00:00): Bonsoir,
Concernant :
– https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778808076
– https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90732503

Êtes-vous sûr(e) pour layer=1 ?
(Ne serait-ce pas plutôt building:level=1 ?)
Je vous laisse mettre à jour en conséquence, n'hésitez pas pour toute question.

Merci d'avance ! :)
user_1566574 (2020-08-21 15:28:40+00:00): C'est toujours un plaisir...
DUGA (2021-04-29 16:22:05+00:00): This access road does NOT connect to 28th St, reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778808421#map=19/39.31886/-76.62494