piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
minfrog314 (2023-07-16 18:47:12+00:00): Hi, I'm curious where you got this data from. I have only been to 2350387035, and it does look like it could have been a sealed mine entrance. Though I can't find any other info about it online.
kydan (2023-07-16 23:08:33+00:00): @minfrog314 I've physically visited most of these sites, and I was able to cross-reference this with historical data from the mining district records from the state of utah. Its been years since I looked up the info, took a lot of searching online to dredge them up. I dont recall where all of it came from.
minfrog314 (2023-07-17 04:06:52+00:00): @kydan Thanks for the fast reply! I will just keep looking then, see if I can find anything. It's only for personal interest, so I probably won't look too much harder.
Ficky IRM-RV (2023-01-06 05:45:18+00:00): Hi, seichter
Thank you for your contribution to OSM. I'm currently doing remote mapping di Nepal and would appreciate your suggestion about this feature (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/465029472). 

I see you changed the tag at the waterway from "tunnel=yes" to "bridge=aqueduct" based on the history. Is it looking like this picture https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Pontcysyllte_aqueduct_arp.jpg ? because the waterway does not appear to be a bridge from the imagery; however, on the other side, there is a road (27.13332295, 85.47250755) that crosses the waterway, which may be appropriate if we tag it as a bridge. but if this road give a bridge it will appear conflict colliding bridges

Any suggestions on this? I really appreciate it. 
Thank you, Happy mapping !
seichter (2023-01-06 09:54:59+00:00): There is a large bridge construction across a stream valley. I consists of an aqueduct of a broad canal and an accompanying path also to be mapped as bridge.
Further to southwest there is a small pedestrian bridge (layer 1) over the canal which is now again at layer 0.

This bridge was mapped before unfortunately at the outline of the canal aqueduct construction. Therefore it was in conflict with the aqueduct layer 1.

I have fixed that now.
Ficky IRM-RV (2023-01-10 02:30:46+00:00): Thanks seichter for providing helpful information. It is very helpful for me.

Thank you and happy mapping!
aceman444 (2022-02-16 14:02:13+00:00): Zdravim, ten G2 park nebude asi to cele uzemie az vratane Rajo.
Trochu ho osekam. http://www.g2p.sk/?page=about
Jose Riha (2022-02-16 14:44:30+00:00): vdaka
bhietsch (2021-01-05 02:22:02+00:00): Thanks for adding this!! Nice to see other people working on PA parks and nature preserves
fabiotofy (2021-01-04 11:41:47+00:00): Buon giorno, solo una curiosità: da dove hai recuperato il nome di tutte quelle varie strade agricole poste a sud della Via Nazionale ? Un saluto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96868413
fabiotofy (2021-10-23 01:26:54+00:00): Ciao, noto che hai inserito due volte la località "Buinz" a distanza di pochi metri. Un punto a destra della strada Menis ed uno a sinistra
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96868413
pio2_122 (2021-01-05 18:45:53+00:00): Dlaczego znów przeprowadziłeś masowy import?

Nie zapoznałeś się z uwagami pod zestawem zmian: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96618991

Do wycofania....
Kosu77 (2021-01-06 11:37:22+00:00): Dane w imporcie zostały sprawdzone na Geoportalu i są poprawne.
Dane błędne zostały poprawione lub usunięte
Zapoznałem się z uwagami do wspomnianego zestawu i się do nich stosuję.
pio2_122 (2021-01-06 12:37:27+00:00): Co oznacza zdanie „Dane w imporcie zostały sprawdzone na Geoportalu” - przez kogo?, jak?, itp.
To, że dane pochodzą z Geoportalu nie oznacza, że są na 100% poprawne - „gdyby importowanie na ślepo byłoby OK, to wszystkie dane już dawno byłyby w OSM” (źródło: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Importowanie_adres%C3%B3w#Weryfikacja_danych)
Czy i w jaki sposób sprawdziłeś 5680 adresów z danymi będącymi już w OSM?

Jeśli stosujesz się do uwag z tamtego zestawu zmian, to gdzie mogę znaleźć spełnienie tych warunków:
- „Ważne jednak by: (0) komunikować się, zwłaszcza przed i w trakcie masowego importu” i „(3) jeśli ktoś importuje musi też posprzątać ewentualne błędy importu...”?
W tym zestawie zmian znalazłem, tylko w jednej miejscowości, niezgodność zapisu dwóch nazw ulic pomiędzy zaimportowanym adresem a ulicą w OSM...

I na koniec: Co z warunkiem „Sprawdź czy adresy nie dublują już istniejących”? (z ww. artykułu na wiki)
Na szybko, kilka przykładów w obrębie kilku ulic jednej wsi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8287961014/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8287961016/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8287961012/history
Kosu77 (2021-01-06 20:37:50+00:00): Dane do importu sprawdzam pobierając obszar i sprawdzam czy nie ma konfliktów.

Jeśli Geoportal nie jest wiarygodnym źródłem to podaj proszę inne bardziej wiarygodne.

Zawsze sprzątam po sobie i poprawiam ewetnualne błędy na podstawie: osmose.openstreetmap.fr.

W przytoczonych linkach nie ma zdublowanych adresów tylko do budynków są przypisane błędne(2020-12-22 zostały zaktualizowane) dane.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
JayTurnr (2021-01-20 02:11:10+00:00): TeePee-for-my-Bunghole?
Berlin53 (2022-04-10 13:16:27+00:00): Welchen Sinn macht das Mapping von Bordsteinkanten, wenn entsprechende Übergänge z.B. für Rollstuhlfahrer nicht angegeben werden?
rarad74 (2021-01-04 08:11:02+00:00): Hi. Pay atention because you damaged all farmland multipoligons from the region. Please use this link https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ ( osm inspector) and select areas, then zoom in on the Galati region and you will see wherebrokne lines from these multipoligons.
Rico557 (2021-01-06 09:15:13+00:00): У меня мапбокс такой же как максар. Какими эксклюзивными снимками Вы пользуетесь?
4004 (2021-01-06 11:25:36+00:00): Sentinel, LandSat
Pavelfantik (2021-01-09 15:45:02+00:00): а еще в вайбере группа микрорайона есть
Rico557 (2021-01-10 14:53:37+00:00):  Я в группах тоже видел вот такое https://www.instagram.com/p/B8I1E84Haoh/?igshid=kzq8bcfyuqzc , но всё-таки меня свежие спутниковые снимки интересуют.
4004 (2021-01-10 15:40:28+00:00): ну вот я Павлу предложил eos.com , но не стоит ожидать там хорошего разрешения.
есть еще всякие конторы вроде Planet, но там лицензия в осм не подходит
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:25:09+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96869532
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:26:08+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96869649
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:26:55+00:00): Hi DanteD2323, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:25:23+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96869532
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:26:21+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96869163
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 21:54:27+00:00): Do not abbreviate street names...
mueschel (2021-01-07 09:34:30+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you explain what this object is?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891741435

The tag you've chosen doesn't seem exactly right.
user_5359 (2021-01-04 05:42:18+00:00): PLEASE! Read and understand the change set comments! You use a wrong keyword!
dadavid (2023-11-30 14:09:27+00:00): Hi suyhoo, ich glaube du hast hier beim löschen die Telefonnummer übersehen, oder das Haus hat ne eigene Telefonnummer, auch cool, aber unwahrscheinlich :D 

habs mal angepasst, hoffe das passt so für dich
GoodClover (2021-01-04 15:09:23+00:00): Hi, it seems you have taken nodes from many places with low number counts, some that where deleted and some that were in use.
I'm not accusing you of doing this on purpose until I know more, but I just want to make sure you're aware you did this.
There's a *very* low chance that this was an accident, but it is possible.
phannam (2021-01-05 02:24:40+00:00): Sorry, i only want to update my area, but with some reason, it 's failed when i upload. Thank you
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 21:34:03+00:00): Hi, it seems that your edits with JOSM were problematic, and you switched to iD later. That is probably better for the first steps. 
I have rolled back all your edits so far, so you get a fresh start.
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 23:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97005326 
where the comment is:
VI-FI-NO: revert newbie edits that removed road networks in NO and FI and messed with old 3-digit nodes, DWG Ticket#2021010410000129
Reverted CSs:
96896509 96893639 96893057 96892414 96892335 96892187 96892138 96891996 96890281 96889803 96888722 96888622 96886321 96885904 96885723 96885140 96884131 96884050 96883897 96883385 96883181 96882449 96875206 96872688 96872493 96870871
R0bst3r (2021-01-04 16:47:17+00:00): Hallo Kochi1982,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* An place Nodes wird kein addr:* Key gesetzt. 
Richtig ist hier der Key "postal_code". Er ist aber eigentlich unnötig, da in Deutschland die PLZ komplett über Relationen erfasst sind.
Auf wiki.osm.org findet man Anleitungen zu allem Themen rund um OSM.
Viel Erfolg noch!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96871197
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 23:05:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97005326 
where the comment is:
VI-FI-NO: revert newbie edits that removed road networks in NO and FI and messed with old 3-digit nodes, DWG Ticket#2021010410000129
Reverted CSs:
96896509 96893639 96893057 96892414 96892335 96892187 96892138 96891996 96890281 96889803 96888722 96888622 96886321 96885904 96885723 96885140 96884131 96884050 96883897 96883385 96883181 96882449 96875206 96872688 96872493 96870871
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 23:05:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97005326 
where the comment is:
VI-FI-NO: revert newbie edits that removed road networks in NO and FI and messed with old 3-digit nodes, DWG Ticket#2021010410000129
Reverted CSs:
96896509 96893639 96893057 96892414 96892335 96892187 96892138 96891996 96890281 96889803 96888722 96888622 96886321 96885904 96885723 96885140 96884131 96884050 96883897 96883385 96883181 96882449 96875206 96872688 96872493 96870871
Ludhiana (2021-04-03 13:06:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662843949/history is still a dry river bed.
kartler175 (2021-01-04 10:13:49+00:00): Bitte überprüfe deine Bearbeitungen und deine Vorgehnsweise, damit Du nicht systematisch weiter Fehler produzierst:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.04051&lat=51.18134&zoom=13&opacity=0.95
CBratina (2021-01-04 12:23:10+00:00): After I clarify that a road is dirt, how is it validated and when does the map change to show it as a double dashed line?
clay_c (2021-01-04 17:12:58+00:00): Hi CBratina,

your edit is live immediately and this road is now shown to the public as a dirt road. This is helpful for software that uses OSM as a backend - for example, routing software will be less likely to direct drivers down this roadway. However, I don't think the standard renderer shows roads differently based on their surface. Could you link to an example on OSM of a double dashed line you're expecting this to look like? 

-Clay
CBratina (2021-01-05 14:56:46+00:00): I tried to reply with samples, but did not realize it was a no reply address.
Enter "White Road, Litchfield, CT" for a double dashed line sample, which is the standard dirt road symbol in Garmin Basecamp and City Navigator.  
Where is the OSM legend showing road symbols?
clay_c (2021-01-05 15:30:51+00:00): Click the "i" icon on the right sidebar for the map legend.

White Road is tagged as a track instead of a minor/residential road. In OSM, we have a distinction between dirt roads that only serve forestry and agriculture purposes (tracks) vs. dirt roads that serve residences and/or connect settlements (minor/residential road with surface specified as dirt). I think White Road should be changed to the latter since it seems to have residences along it.

-Clay
CBratina (2021-01-05 22:00:43+00:00): Clay,
The Map Key does not show a double dashed line symbol like White Road, so I suggest you add it to the Map Key as a public, unpaved road which may or may not have residences on it.  To me a Track is a jeep trail that is to rough for a road bike and does not have residences on it, normally.  
Most cyclists want to know if a road is dirt or paved.  Road cyclists prefer to avoid dirt. Gravel cyclists seek it out.  I do both. 
 Both Garmin Base Camp and City Navigator show dirt roads as this double dashed line.  If you want to show a dirt road the same as a paved road, OSM has no value to me as a cyclist.
ezekielf (2021-01-06 03:20:29+00:00): Hi CBratina,
I certainly see the value of cycling maps distinguishing between dirt and paved.  I'm not aware of any base map layers rendered from OSM data that currently do this though.  The maintainers of the standard layer (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto) probably wouldn't be interested in adding that level of detail, but for a cycling specific map it could make a lot of sense if enough roads have surface type specified.

I just did a search and found gravelmap.com which shows an overlay of dirt and gravel roads generated from OSM data.  In your area of interest it looks like this Webster Road is highlighted as a dirt surface, but the White Road you mentioned is not.   Either because it's tagged as an off road track or because it lacks a surface tag depending on how they are using the data.
https://gravelmap.com/#12.52/41.71135/-73.16621

Have a good one, Zeke.
MxxCon (2021-01-04 06:11:56+00:00): Hello. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks. "It is recommended to represent the sidewalk as a separate way, if the sidewalk is not just attached with a curb but separated by a road verge or other barriers, to prevent routers from assuming free crossing". Most sidewalks in NYC are attached to roads by curbs and runs parallel along the whole length, as such they shouldn't be mapped as a separate path, but rather tagged as a property of roads.
kguenther24 (2021-01-04 14:40:04+00:00): Hello, Thank you for pointing this out as I was aware of the two methods of sidewalk mapping, but was assuming the separate paths were desired due to large already existing portions of the map using this method. In cities like NYC I also assumed an increased level of detail would be appreciated. I will refrain from creating separate sidewalk paths in the future. Thank you.
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-01-25 20:27:33+00:00): Just a note, please realign any imagery to existing GPX tracks (Bing and Maxar images for Batangas City area is offset).
StorsjonLake (2021-01-25 21:42:42+00:00): Hi TagaSanPedroAko, thanks for the suggestion. I see that Strava is available here as well. I will reference OSM GPS traces and Strava when mapping in the area going forward. Thanks!
Colbertson (2021-01-04 14:59:54+00:00): Grabbing early nodes from across the world to use for a road?
phannam (2021-01-05 02:25:51+00:00): Sorry, i only want to fix my area. But some reason, its's an accident, 
Thank you
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 23:05:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97005326 
where the comment is:
VI-FI-NO: revert newbie edits that removed road networks in NO and FI and messed with old 3-digit nodes, DWG Ticket#2021010410000129
Reverted CSs:
96896509 96893639 96893057 96892414 96892335 96892187 96892138 96891996 96890281 96889803 96888722 96888622 96886321 96885904 96885723 96885140 96884131 96884050 96883897 96883385 96883181 96882449 96875206 96872688 96872493 96870871
datamongers (2021-01-04 13:41:11+00:00): It looks like you have changed blodgett canyon trail to no bikes, but unless something has changed recently, im pretty sure bikes are still allowed up to the wilderness boundary.
BimEwok (2021-01-04 15:17:55+00:00): fixed
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:41:34+00:00): Hello again! After reverting I check the area on JSOM errors (double nodes). Short question: Did your waterways really have copyright character "©" as start character?
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-06 05:52:50+00:00): thanks alot..
no it doesnt have © i put just for mark my file, it can be deleted. name is alur sungai/ sungai musiman (stream; in english)
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:59:22+00:00): Let's continue the discussion after my work day.
adiatmad (2021-01-06 06:10:27+00:00): Hello Pak Ihwal_Praja.

Happy to know you are fast responder. Thank you very much.

You can open this query (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/122e) then click Export to open in JOSM, fix your edit, then upload again.

This is a good forum to start if you have any question related to OSM (https://www.facebook.com/groups/osm.id/?_rdc=1&_rdr)
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-06 09:35:29+00:00): Thanks mr adiatmad
I will try edit using josm, this is new for me may i need time to learn josm
Thanks very much
user_5359 (2021-01-06 15:30:37+00:00): okay I make a cleanup
10 overlapping ways reduced
30 nodes nearby a highway checked, 2 nodes got tag noexit=yes other was not connected ways
I have also the reduce the leading comment sign in the name of ways.
rab (2021-01-28 16:36:57+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442415023
highway=unclassified?
Palolo (2021-02-05 00:45:55+00:00): Maddison Lake, Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Please do not change the classification on the major roads.
I returned the tagging to Trunk.
Eric Dennison (2021-03-03 01:25:48+00:00): It looks like this changeset added the Morrill Memorial Library designation to a building that is, I believe, a private residence. There is already the next building to the SE that is identified as the library and which I believe is already correct.
fudsnottica (2021-03-03 18:29:43+00:00): I think this was a way without a building tag so it didn't render if im reading this changeset correctly. However I've removed this duplicate library building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100369470. 

Thanks for letting me know!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96878024
Arvind Kartik (2021-06-09 06:42:46+00:00): For a number of roads, the names are changed to "Haverhill Drive" in this changeset
n76 (2021-06-09 15:35:57+00:00): Wow! I really messed up there. Thank you for pointing this out!

I think I have corrected it now in change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106104718

Please let me know if I have missed any.
mueschel (2021-01-05 08:47:47+00:00): This import went wrong.
All the objects have many foreign keys that shouldn't appear in OSM:

dbtmax=0.00000000000e+000
klssng=0
layer=2
lcode=DA0280
namobj=Kali Ngarus
remark=Alur Sungai
shape_leng=9.74602038582e-003
slprt=0.00000000000e+000
tipsng=0
wmax=0.00000000000e+000

Where can we find the documentation of this import?
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-05 09:12:42+00:00): sorry.. i dont know how to solve this problem. I still learning about JOSM and OSM. 
I'm learning to processing SHP file (from https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/portal-web)  to OSM file..
than this happen I upload to many and i dont know how to fix this..
May you can find my OSM file at
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1a_gV49h4TnMSvHCb9k3NGk8NkebGgyMp?usp=sharing

thank you
mueschel (2021-01-05 09:30:02+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply!
OSM has some rules with respect to imports of foreign data. 
Please have a look at them:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

The best way to proceed is to delete this data again, and then to start from scratch following the import guideline.
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-05 09:33:12+00:00): The easy ways I have to delete it
May you can show me how to delete the bulk that ihave uploded?
😊 Thanks
adiatmad (2021-01-05 10:08:55+00:00): Hello mueschel & Pak Ihwal_Praja.

I'm interested to joining this discussion.
Happy to share with you Pak Ihwal_Praja.

You can open this query (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/122e) then click Export to open in JOSM, fix your edit, then upload again.

This is a good forum to start if you have any question related to OSM (https://www.facebook.com/groups/osm.id/?_rdc=1&_rdr)

Happy mapping.
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:24:51+00:00): please have also a look on  https://www.osm.org/changeset/96879714.
mueschel (2021-01-06 09:25:02+00:00): Hi,
please be careful if you use the editing method mentioned by adiatmad - if you don't take a lot of care you might end up with corrupted data and a huge number of conflicts during upload.

I'd recommend to do a revert of the changeset using the appropriate tools.

There are also several rivers in this changeset were the import left many small pieces but no continuous way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891776300#map=17/-7.68542/112.42225
Allison P (2021-12-12 23:24:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891777260 does not exist and has never existed.
abvincen (2021-12-13 12:57:02+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.
Apologies for the incorrect road digitization, Going ahead I'll ensure to check for the latest aerial imagery before making any edits.
Thank you once again, I'm looking forward to learn more form you.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96878743
karson_ (2021-01-04 14:38:23+00:00): Mapbox Satellite is the highest resolution and best alignment for the Quad Cities
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96879410
Glassman (2021-01-08 18:27:04+00:00): Tip: Other imagery may be more current. Lately I've noticed that the Maxar Premium Beta is the latest for Western Washington. The imagery can be changed using the layers/background icon on the right hand side of the editor. Note: Most imagery is not exactly aligned. There is a tool at the bottom to align the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96879472
user_5359 (2021-01-05 15:56:14+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
jnspdg=1
klsrmp=1
lcode=FB0020
natural=grassland
remark=Padang Rumput
shape_area=7.66660999966e-007
shape_leng=3.83185288196e-003
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.

And - to be honest - I don't believe the name of every object is "Alang-alang". It seems to me more of a description.
adiatmad (2021-01-06 02:03:51+00:00): Same vibes here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96878402
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:22:30+00:00): I have seen the other change set as well. It stopped me from simply correcting the changes by deleting all non-OSM keys. I also had doubts about the license and the check for existing objects. 
I tend to roll back all changes to give Ihwal_Praja time to learn about OSM and agree on the correct representation of his entries.
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-06 05:28:15+00:00): ok im sorry im wrong uploded that
now i tryying to delelte all my upload and i dont know to do that
please help
Ihwal_Praja (2021-01-06 05:35:23+00:00): That data i get from public data mapping institution in my country
that is not name of region or area, the data about land cover like savanna
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:36:19+00:00): I have revert this changeset. Please check the data.
user_5359 (2021-01-06 05:57:48+00:00): This is my standard hint for this case: Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example).