piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
lleung (2017-11-09 05:58:11+00:00): 欢迎来到OSM。
请参考 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines，了解大陆地区作图规则。
名称只需中文，英文地名应该放在多语言的英文标签之下。
lleung (2017-11-09 05:58:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines
user_5359 (2017-11-06 18:40:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A secondary highway with 15mph speed limit? Really?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
4004 (2017-11-06 22:41:11+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
еще бы названия нормально написать, да углы подровнять
user_6110846 (2017-12-10 20:36:10+00:00): згідно прийнятих домовленостей укр спільноти https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10246   /за 2016-12-18 о 15 : 20  ) 
застосовуємо стандарт по Постанові  за 2010 рік 
http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/55-2010-п
user_6110846 (2017-12-10 20:36:31+00:00): про Експострой
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:34:07+00:00): Olá, willi_rec.
Nesta sua edição você criou 3 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
aharvey (2017-11-07 08:29:26+00:00): Is this rock pool, a swimming pool? leisure=swimming_pool can be used for man mad outdoor rock pools too.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ivanbranco (2022-09-18 14:38:00+00:00): Ciao marceg,

so che è un changeset vecchio, ma vedo che sei ancora attivo a Venezia, ti ricordi cosa doveva rappresentare questa way rimasta senza tag? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538809454/
marceg16579 (2022-09-20 08:24:42+00:00): È un muro, avevo dimenticato di taggarlo perché ero preso da altri dettagli. Grazie per avermelo ricordato!
ivanbranco (2022-09-20 08:28:50+00:00): Figurati! Grazie a te per le modifiche e per la risposta! Buon mapping :)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
trigpoint (2017-11-07 18:30:26+00:00): Hi, this should be mapped as amenity=parking. Its name isn't CAR PARK.

Cheers Phil
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
streckenkundler (2017-11-08 21:20:34+00:00): Moin...

irgendwas ist beim Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33912949#map=14/52.5083/13.3347&layers=N nich nicht ganz in Ordnung... OSMI meldet einen Geometriefehler...

Ich wüsste jetzt aber auch nicht, wie das zu lösen ist...

...informiert Sven
streckenkundler (2017-11-08 21:21:52+00:00): Ach ja, noch der OSMI-Link: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=13.36969&lat=52.53249&zoom=18

Sven
RoterEmil (2017-11-08 22:03:11+00:00): Nichts für ungut, aber: was willst Du mir mit den Kommentaren sagen? Nur weil ein QA-Tool einen Fehler anzeigt, heißt das ja noch lange nicht, dass es ein Fehler ist. Sicherlich ließe sich die Wendeltreppe verbessern - doch gibt es m.W. noch gar kein Schema bei OSM.
Davor war die Treppe, zuletzt bearbeitet 2009!, übrigens ein tropfenförmiger Weg :/
Tja, was schlägst Du vor? Im wiki konnte ich nichts zu Wendeltreppen finden, auch taginfo bietet nur eine schwache Auswahl (oder ich habe mit den falschen Wörtern gesucht) und im Forum habe ich zu meinen letzten tagging-Fragen - sagen wir - eine nur verhaltene Reaktion erhalten. Was also tun?
Schönen Gruß :)
streckenkundler (2017-11-09 07:21:30+00:00): Hmm... Ich glaube das schon... Das wird doch aber nicht die einzigste erfasste Wendeltreppe sein... 
Ich dachte eventuell an sowas wie layer=0;1
Alternativ könnte die Wendeltreppe gesplittet werden und der obere Teil mit layer=1 versehen werden, ist in meinen Augen inhaltlich nicht falsch, auch wenn es ein bisschen Tagging für die Fehlerprüfung ist.
Geben eventuell die indoor-Tag da was entsprechendes her? Bei Indoor kenne ich mich aber nicht aus... Vielleicht sollten wir das doch im Forum thematisieren?

Sven
RoterEmil (2017-11-09 08:40:44+00:00): Wenn man etwas gutes dazu gemeinsam findet, wäre ich immer daran interessiert. Eine Diskussion Im Forum zu eröffnen, überlasse ich aber Dir/anderen.
Ich hatte bei taginfo die Übersetzungsvarianten von leo (https://dict.leo.org/englisch-deutsch/wendeltreppe) abgefragt. Am "häufigsten" gibt es 'highway=spiral_staircase' (24x). Daneben gibt es mehr oder minder Einzelfälle von steps:type/step_type/...=spiral. Ist m.E. beides nicht so treffend. Eine Aufsplittung finde ich nicht gut, denn eine Wendeltreppe kann ja auch etliche Windungen (-> bei OSM dann Überschneidungen) haben. Ich denke grad an etwas vergleichbares zu 'step_count', d.h. man malt nur einen Kreis und beschreibt, wie häufig sich die Treppe einmal um die eigene Achse dreht. Die Zugänge werden mit level-Angaben gekennzeichnet. Es gibt ja auch Wendeltreppen mit mehreren Zugangsebenen (z.B. in Türmen). Könnte vielleicht brauchbar sein
streckenkundler (2017-11-12 13:49:09+00:00): Ich habs mal im Forum angesprochen...
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=672289#p672289

Sven
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-07 13:31:55+00:00): Você desconectou as vias que cruzam com esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225052313/history
mavl (2018-12-25 20:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:21:55+00:00): please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things
dremdau (2024-11-08 10:23:43+00:00): I disagree, the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:staircase) says that addr:unit is usually used instead. Also, why are you commenting on a 7 year old changeset?
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 12:10:24+00:00): I don't think we should continue to pretend it is ok to use addr:unit for staircases, because these are quite different things, an addr:unit is typically referring to an individual address, while addr:staircase is usually referring to many addresses (everybody who has access through this staircase).
The claim that addr:unit would be a suitable replacement was introduced just 2 years ago, and I am going to revert it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aaddr%3Astaircase&type=revision&diff=2321398&oldid=2290621 because it creates inconsistency with the definition of addr:unit

There is no time limit to complain about undiscussed mass edits, or is there?
dieterdreist (2024-11-20 10:21:24+00:00): keimo, are you going to revert your undiscussed mass edit?
keimo (2024-11-20 14:37:26+00:00): No, and I don't think fixing non-standard tags requires discussion.

Reverting this (and other similar tags in Finland) would also break public transport routing to the entrances in question.

Isn't there another tag you could use to indicate that the address is to a staircase, if that's important?
dieterdreist (2024-11-21 08:29:24+00:00): I don't know about Finland, and whether it has been discussed there, but the edit was not limited to Finland. Generally, all mass edits require public discussion and approval. I question that you "fixed" the tags, because "addr:unit" is not the same as "addr:staircase".
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:09:58+00:00): This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.
RSergei (2017-11-07 13:56:57+00:00): В чём причина удаления домов?
Kostik (2017-11-07 17:06:28+00:00): Дубликаты
RSergei (2017-11-07 17:12:10+00:00): Всё понял!
mavl (2018-12-25 20:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 13:05:05+00:00): Can yo look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1257696 ?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:00+00:00): Olá, willi_rec.
Nesta sua edição você criou 10 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:10:23+00:00): This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself.
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:20:05+00:00): please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-11-06 20:43:34+00:00): Hi stevenLAD, I could not help but notice that you eliminated one of my previous edits in this changeset, could you tell me why(?)

if it was a question of 'routing' then I think that the best think would have been to change the 'access' tag to 'destination' rather than eliminating it all together (the spesific afformention tag seems to work well with both Mapzen and OSRM), I noticed that 'Mapzen' and 'OSRM' provide incorrect routing directions through the way that was formally access restricted, Grasshopper seems to be the only navigation service that does not

The last time I surveyed this area, there was a street-level opening through the 'traffic island' that seperates the two directions of traffic on 'Avenida do 1º Congresso do MPLA' with a lift-gate barring access between 'Rua 17 de Setembro' and 'Rua Guilherme Capelo'

was there a recent change made to the road infrastructure in this area?
stevenLAD (2017-11-07 06:01:46+00:00): Good morning Diogenes

It is no longer physically possible (if it ever was) to cross Congress do MPLA at this point - There is a no entry sign at the turn. You have to continue to the roundabout to do a U turn.
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-11-08 04:17:43+00:00): I do not think that it would be permited to make a turn at this location, I think that those with the permission to access this route could use it as a passthrough if they are coming from 'Rua 17 de Setembro' heading for 'Rua Guilherme Capelo', I assume it is inaccessible to the general public because there is a lift-gate at this crossing, anyway, I wish I had a reference to show you but if you ever pass through 'Rua dos Herois' keep an eye out at this location
stevenLAD (2017-11-12 11:40:51+00:00): I agree that there is a restricted route where you had placed it - my apologies for its removal. I have reinstated it as a permissive service road with no intersecting nodes on congress do MPLA, and the two lift barriers. I am not sure that it serves  a lot, but it does exist as you said.
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-07 14:54:35+00:00): Hi. You have tagged (a - perhaps misspelled - form of) `second chance youth`. Can you tell us something about, what it is and who has initiate it? And why do you use Vespucci? Are there some instructions?
The problem is that some other mappers on St. Lucia tag it too but in different spellings (e.g. `second-chance youth`, `secondchance youth`, `2nd chance youth`, and so on). And none of these keys aren't goot practice, because they contain whitespace characters! Also it's difficult for evaluators to find all these different spellings
freeExec (2017-11-07 12:33:48+00:00): Что это
```power=pole"придал ускорение"```
Anto110 (2017-11-07 13:05:36+00:00): Опечатка. Исправил.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2024-11-08 09:19:54+00:00): please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-07 14:52:20+00:00): Hi. You have tagged (a - perhaps misspelled - form of) `second chance youth`. Can you tell us something about, what it is and who has initiate it? And why do you use Vespucci? Are there some instructions?

The problem is that some other mappers on St. Lucia tag it too but in different spellings (e.g. `second-chance youth`, `secondchance youth`, `2nd chance youth`, and so on). And none of these keys aren't goot practice, because they contain whitespace characters! Also it's difficult for evaluators to find all these different spellings