piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
divaddivag (2022-12-09 15:55:25+00:00): Un peu loin dans ma mémoire et cela date d'une époque ou je n'avais ces histoire de bicycle=yes sur les footway n'étaient pas claires.. Ces footway posés naïvement dans ce genre d'environnement sont une vraie plaie quand je confronte mes sorties à OSM car en général il n'y a pas d'interdiction explicite!  Je peux faire le terrain sans difficulté. Si tu as d'autres interrogations dans ce secteur du 14, envoies moi une liste et j'irais voir.

 David
Carto'Cité (2022-12-09 17:14:41+00:00): Salut David,
Merci pour ton retour. Parfaitement d'accord avec toi concernant ce genre de chemin. C'est noté, si j'ai des doutes, je le note de mon côté et je pourrai théoriquement te ressortir les éléments ensuite.
À très bientôt.
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:45:45+00:00): Wofür steht denn die Zahlenkombination? Eigentlich sollte dort doch z.B. ein Firmenname rein.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121870476
rohieb (2022-07-07 19:10:00+00:00): Ist das korrekt, dass der Hofladen hier nicht mehr existiert, und jetzt ein Cafe ist?
limes11 (2022-07-07 20:01:12+00:00): Ich hatte das nach einem Hinweis eingetragen. 

Webseite/Instagram des Hofladens sind offline, google sagt "Geschlossen" - von daher spricht alles dafür.
eggie (2022-06-03 07:03:20+00:00): Dag Bauke.. Weet je zeker dat dit klimtoestel een officiele naam heeft of kun je wellicht beter description gebruiken.
Dits zelfde geldt ook voor name=skatebaan
Kijk je nog even?
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 
Kijk hier wanneer je wel of niet name=  kunt gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
Bauke W (2022-06-03 17:28:58+00:00): Ahh goed dat je het zegt. Je ik denk inderdaad dat het niet de officiele naam is. Zo noemen we het hier vaak. ik zal het veranderen.
Dankjewel voor de feedback :)

- Bauke
eggie (2022-06-03 17:32:36+00:00): Dag Bauke..
Je kunt ook loc_name=  ... gebruiken als het zo in de buurt bekend is.

Mapse
Eggie
Bauke W (2022-06-03 17:34:25+00:00): Ahh gaaf, dan zal ik dat in de toekomst gebruiken daarvoor.

- Bauke
goldfndr (2022-06-29 19:22:22+00:00): Thank you for adding the old_name tags!
user_2066394 (2022-06-03 10:10:16+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
impiaaa (2022-06-03 16:04:04+00:00): I don't think it being a point is what contributes to visibility. I think if you had added office=company to the building part it would have also shown up.
totera (2022-06-03 13:03:29+00:00): Ciao ErosR,
hai cancellato il "nuovo" Eurospin (che è stato costruito nel 2019).
Se stai mappando senza conoscere i luoghi tieni presente che le immagini aeree possono essere non aggiornate e quindi fai molta attenzione prima di cancellare quello che trovi.
MxxCon (2022-06-03 00:43:17+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout "junction=roundabout is used only on road intersections where traffic on the roundabout has right of way."
But here we have pedestrian crossings which have right of way.
I think a more appropriate tag would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121871871
Falsernet (2022-06-03 21:29:48+00:00): Do the cars have to give way to pedestrians, or is it signal controlled? It's relatively common in the UK to find roundabouts with signals and pedestrian crossings, sometimes even accessing the center of the roundabout.

I wouldn't disagree with junction=circular if it's a pedestrian priority type situation. Regardless it's definitely not just a oneway street that forms a loop.
MxxCon (2022-06-04 04:32:33+00:00): Looking at streetside imagery on Bing, it is traffic lights controlled, and from satellite imagery you can obviously see pedestrian crossings.
This also matches https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Misclassification

The locations in UK that you are talking about, are they actual proper roundabouts or are they actually junction=circular and people just mis-tagged them as junction=roundabout because they neglected to note the differences and of the habit of calling all similar looking road configurations as roundabouts?
Falsernet (2022-06-04 14:11:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations specifies that there can be signals, but that if the signals were to go out, the circular traffic would have priority.

I'm not sure that this junction is even signal controlled considering the sharks teeth seen in satellite imagery (corroborated by yield signs on google street view). It may be that they only serve the pedestrian crossings, or it may be that they're also used as a traffic management strategy. Though the yield signs target traffic entering the junction so according to the wiki this seems to fit within its definition of a roundabout.

I'm not 100% familiar with US, NY and NYC traffic law but at signals I believe pedestrians and vehicles only have right of way on their respective green lights - I'm not sure if this still applies if the lights lose power. In terms of vehicular traffic I'd argue this definitely fits the given definition of a roundabout, despite it being much different to the same-old idea of a strictly circular roundabout with crossings only around the outside.
QC3 Construction (2022-06-04 06:41:42+00:00): When adding homes, do it in bigger groups or not at all as it is not needed.
Thank you
gscholz (2022-06-04 09:01:50+00:00): Hi souzaads1,
this changeset has left over several errors in the OSM database regarding destroyed relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-48.63675&lat=-26.04198&zoom=13

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121872360

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-06-07 06:57:10+00:00): Hi souzaads1, 
these errors still exist. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-06-12 07:41:10+00:00): Hi souzaads1, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset now to fix those issues.
Guido
user_16184091 (2022-06-03 03:53:19+00:00): How can there be only parks without forests? Are the forests shown in satellite imagery nothing?
user_16184091 (2022-06-03 03:53:45+00:00): This question needs to be discussed
Totor (2024-05-07 04:12:28+00:00): Hi Karta,
Same comment here. I can't see this restaurant on the street pictures.
Was it replaced by the new "Uncle Brew" ?
Totor (2024-05-06 06:08:30+00:00): Hi Karta,
You added this Internet Cafe 2 years ago, but I can't see any sign in 2 sets of pictures I took there this month.
Bing streetside also does not show anything:
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=10.318083%7E123.897755&lvl=18.9&pi=-5.7&style=x&dir=360.8

I would like to move the POI to the correct place, but there are no signboards allowing me to do this.

Do you remember where it was exactly ?
Cheers,
Totor
mueschel (2022-06-18 16:48:34+00:00): Please check this way, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894590023
GOwin (2022-06-19 00:00:32+00:00): Thanks for heads-up!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-03 08:09:49+00:00): This series of changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420503842/history was result of incorrect sidewalk:both=no AND bug in StreetComplete which was fixed in https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/commit/9f3f8bbc6dde85ece249a9571042407152887b3a

MxxCon not only is not at fault but also reported this bug - resulting in a fix

Data fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121881709 (very rare case where remote editing with SC is OK - as I only repeat what local mapper added but app failed to record due to a bug) and I also opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3207658 as here I am unable to answer it remotely
user_5359 (2022-06-04 17:03:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/862178622. What is the meaning of the tag street: = Whitecap?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-06-04 19:54:15+00:00): its called a copy past error and I fix it
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-16 13:49:37+00:00): Can you fix geometry of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066287939/history and other buildings added by you that mismatch actual building shapes?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 06:49:40+00:00): Requested also in https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1061753
SekeRob (2022-06-03 16:25:38+00:00): Hi,

I wrote to another flixbus route mapper about a month ago concerning the roundabout at Chieti Scalo station. Still routing illegally there. Buses exiting the station going southbound onto the SS5 (SR5 ref is wrong since always) are obliged to loop the roundabout first, they're not allowed to take an immediate right or make use of the shortcut. The bus exit sign is unambiguous on that. The sation arrivial way I could move without messing with the order but for departure did not change it the right way after updating and adding the roundabout bypasses as then I would have messed up the routing order no doubt. The municipal cops sit there regularly in their car ready with their ticket book.

The situation is similar over at  Ortona train station. Buses arriving descending from Via del Porto have to first loop the roundabout as the direct turn is too narrow.

cheers

ciao
Vulcanodong (2022-06-03 03:59:05+00:00): 只是主路开通 大部分匝道还没开呢 等开了之后再改吧
JJIglesias (2022-06-04 03:26:07+00:00): Para tu informacion la Ruta del Circuito Tunari, estaba dibujada NO contra imagenes Maxar, sino contra mis propias trazas GPS en OSMTracker y verificada contra HeatMaps de STRAVA. No voy a corregirla nuevamente porque No vale la pena. La mayoria del PN esta dibujado tambien contra mis trazas GPS de OSMTracker. Saludos
5m4u9 (2022-06-04 06:54:12+00:00): Hola, puse maxar porque menciona aquí en tu último cambio de esta área, y también dice trazas GPS OSM, pero activando estaban desplazadas hacia arriba, ahora está más centrado en el promedio de trazas...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113657384#map=16/-17.3484/-66.1520&layers=G
LuxuryCoop (2022-06-04 00:35:34+00:00): 안녕하세요. 오픈스트리트맵 한국 커뮤니티에서 활동하고 있는 LuxuryCoop이라고 합니다.

우선 실제로 존재하는 공원을 삭제한 user_16184834의 바뀜집합[1]을 되돌렸습니다. 다음에도 선생님께서 정성스럽게 기여한 결과물을 토론 없이 되돌리는 사람이 있다면 오픈스트리트맵 한국 커뮤니티[2]로 신고해 주시면 적극적으로 도와 드리도록 하겠습니다.

또한 iD 편집기(브라우저 내 편집기)의 '자연림'은 번역 오류로, 실제로는 자연림/인공림을 가리지 않고 사용할 수 있습니다.[3] 번역 때문에 개념을 헷갈리셨다면 진심으로 죄송하다는 말을 전하고 싶습니다. 번역은 빠른 시일 내에 수정하도록 하겠습니다.

오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면
1. 공원 영역을 크게 그려서 공원 태그를 붙이고
2. 공원 내의 숲을 따로 그려서 숲 태그를 붙이는 것이 정석입니다.
이렇게 하면 실제로 존재하는 숲을 오픈스트리트맵에 나타낼 수 있을 뿐만아니라, 숲 영역까지 공원에 포함된다는 사실을 나타낼 수 있습니다(혹시나 포켓몬 고를 하신다면, 이렇게 매핑한 생태공원은 포켓몬 고 상에서 공원으로 인식됩니다). 일단 몇몇 생태공원을 위 기준에 따라 편집했습니다.

꾸준한 기여 감사드리며, 앞으로도 양질의 기여를 부탁드립니다.

[1]
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121875003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121883822
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121873906

[2] https://t.me/osmKorea
또는 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wood?uselang=ko
lyctkel (2022-06-17 06:33:43+00:00): Hi Josef K,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066294088 which uses building=y´.
This tag is only used here.
From my point of view building=yes would fit better.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abuilding for details.
Regrads,
lyctkel
redd (2022-06-05 15:01:04+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden.
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:18:37+00:00): zurückgesetzt
Allison P (2022-06-03 05:04:38+00:00): Hmm, yeah, I only added the tag to untagged ways. I guess these weren't counted.
redd (2022-06-05 15:00:48+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden.
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:18:47+00:00): zurückgesetzt
rhtb0 (2022-06-03 04:58:06+00:00): 정정: 이름
redd (2022-06-05 15:00:26+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden.
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:18:42+00:00): zurückgesetzt
redd (2022-06-05 15:00:17+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden.
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:18:51+00:00): zurückgesetzt
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-03 08:09:53+00:00): This series of changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420503842/history was result of incorrect sidewalk:both=no AND bug in StreetComplete which was fixed in https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/commit/9f3f8bbc6dde85ece249a9571042407152887b3a

MxxCon not only is not at fault but also reported this bug - resulting in a fix

Data fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121881709 (very rare case where remote editing with SC is OK - as I only repeat what local mapper added but app failed to record due to a bug) and I also opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3207658 as here I am unable to answer it remotely
osmviborg (2022-06-03 06:05:06+00:00): highway=track
Jens Olsen DK (2022-06-03 06:56:07+00:00): Correct, thanks for the change :-)
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:43:20+00:00): Ich glaube der Tag "footway=access_aisle" passt hier nicht ganz. "highway=footway" müsste reichen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:footway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121876618
redd (2022-06-05 15:00:04+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden.
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:18:56+00:00): zurückgesetzt
redd (2022-06-04 18:36:10+00:00): Was soll das genau? Wurden die OMV Stellen umbeannt? Selbst dann bitte keine Massenedits machen
redd (2022-06-05 14:59:34+00:00): Hallo mvw93,
ich habe nun recherchiert und dank der Hilfe eines anderen Nutzers einen Presseartikel von OMV gefunden, in dem drauf hingewiesen wird, das eben OMV-Tankstellen verkauft wurde. Damit dürfte maximal der operator=OMV aber nicht brand=OMV oder name=OMV entfernt werden. 
Ich bitte dich die Änderungen daher rückgängig zu machen.
mvw93 (2022-06-10 08:19:01+00:00): zurückgesetzt
sen_takeya (2023-08-23 20:41:48+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140292727
Olga | Yanosik (2022-06-03 08:13:25+00:00): Witam, kończąc remont trzeba zdjąć wszystkie tagi remontowe a więc checkdate, construction end date, opening date i note również.  
Pozdrawiam Olga
wwwit (2022-06-03 09:35:24+00:00): Te zmiany wprowadzą zapewne instytucje odpowiedzialne za utrzymanie mostu. Ostateczne odbiory są nadal w toku, choć most jest już przejezdny.
DP24PH (2022-06-03 06:56:26+00:00): ERRATUM on initial changeset comment:

DP24 #DPresearch #Mapping101 #NewNormal #BetterNormal ALERT: [ #NCR #Cavite ] R-2 bicycle route continuation (with minor routing fixes) to Tagaytay Bypass Road (with unmarked bike lane provisions on portions of PH-62, PH-419, PH-410/R-2/GEAH)
juminet (2022-06-03 06:59:59+00:00): Due to a JOSM bug, no comment could be written and I know this is full of errors. It will be corrected asap.
daniel v s (2022-06-03 07:21:31+00:00): Al carrer el Puig Montoriol números 21-37.
Dodko (2022-06-04 14:56:36+00:00): Táto bytovka je zbúraná?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62328973
PavolG (2022-06-04 19:49:21+00:00): Na ortofoto je uz len kus zelenej plochy a chodniky dookola. Takze IMHO ano. Cerpal som z toho.
PS: nepovoleny zdroj gugel na satelite ju nema tiez. Na streetview spred 10 rokov je taka spoluobcanmi vybyvana skoro ruina...
PavolG (2022-06-04 19:51:42+00:00): A toto sa asi tyka rovnakej budovy
https://kosice.korzar.sme.sk/c/22117177/znicenu-budovu-v-moldave-zburaju-ma-tam-byt-namestie.html

Na fotke je vidno cislo domu 8, ulica sedi...
Dodko (2022-06-04 19:59:42+00:00): Tak potom mesto nemá poriadok, v katastri nezapísali zbúranie budovy, ani v registri adries neukončili adresy.
PavolG (2022-06-06 19:41:53+00:00): No co si budeme hovorit... Moldava :-D
Dodko (2022-06-07 08:29:58+00:00): Adresy nie sú ukončené, ešte stále tam mesto eviduje trvalé pobyty, tak neviem či tam tiež hádžu úradné zásielky.
PavolG (2022-06-07 19:28:09+00:00): Neviem, kde im to dorucuju. Ale dlznikov na tej adrese stale eviduju :-D
https://egov.moldava.sk/default.aspx?NavigationState=806:0:

Proste bordel ako v Moldave
hsc666 (2022-06-03 10:22:11+00:00): Hallo xKaxEnx und willkommen bei OSM!

Der Weg ist sicherlich kein Fußweg, sondern war vorher schon richtig eingetragen. Der Fußweg ist 10 Meter daneben an der Ampel. Hier dürften lediglich Rettungsfahrzeuge im Einsatz drüber fahren. Ich denke, das sollte wieder auf service zurückgeändert werden. Oder was war der Grund für Deine Änderung?

VG
hsc666
hsc666 (2022-07-31 11:14:41+00:00): CS reverted due to lack of response
RodrigoVi (2023-06-09 16:59:36+00:00): to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165415934 you've added bus_bay=3, but bus_bay is near a stop and can't be all the way along a route, so the only values are "both", "right" or "left".

deeplと 
をhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165415934、bus_bay=3を追加していますが、bus_bayは停留所の近くであり、ルート上のすべての場所に存在することはできないので、値は「both」「right」「left」しかないのです。
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:37:44+00:00): Hi,

alle Tags, die mit der Schließung nicht mehr gültig sind sollten den "disused"-Präfix bekommen. Also z.B. "name", "email", "caravans".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121880695
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:42:54+00:00): comments：退回错误的修改集
user_8101879 (2022-06-13 20:58:10+00:00): Hi,

be careful with the roles : you put 'platform' instead of 'place_of_worship' on a church (relation 14211084)
I fixed it.
Best regards
Rainero (2022-08-01 11:03:48+00:00): Bonjour didivo67,  

tu es très actif/active pour enregistrer les calvaires.  Toutefois  la clé "name" est faussement utilisée.  
Regarde ici:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name_est_juste_le_nom
Pour "name", on devrait utiliser uniquement le nom propre. 

"Bildstock" n'est pas le nom, mais le type d'objet. Il est assez rare que ces objets ont un nom comme cela: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8149631229.

Encore joyeux cartographie!  
Rainer
hesdrib (2022-06-07 10:37:52+00:00): commune (à facilités ) 
nom bilingues ?
Mordechai23 (2022-06-06 19:58:09+00:00): To są dwie nazwy - jedna to name=Lokalne Centrum Sterowania w Koninie a druga short_name=LCS Konin

zapoznajcie się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
laurent-38 (2022-06-03 10:22:21+00:00): Bonjour Luka,

Merci pour ces ajouts,
mais attention aux maladresses : j'ai annulé ta modification sur la ville Hô Chi Minh-Ville (voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121887079)

Cordialement
~~
laurent
user_8101879 (2022-06-03 14:30:19+00:00): Bonjour,

l'aire de votre changeset est beaucoup trop grande : merci de décomposer vos changesets par secteurs géographiques de taille raisonnable
Cordialement
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:35:47+00:00): Hi,

für (normale) Mauern verwendet man üblicherweise keine Fläche. Ziehe einfach eine Linie von einem Haus zum anderen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121881750
martin:a (2022-06-03 12:06:50+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, bin grad am lernen. habs geändert
Palolo (2023-01-12 15:27:37+00:00): Can you confirm the spelling of this school please? Is it "Kahengele" or "Kahengere"
redd (2022-06-04 18:32:28+00:00): Vielen Dank und Herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
dvdhoven (2022-06-04 07:26:11+00:00): forward/backward in routes slaat op de tekenrichting van de weg, niet of het de heen- of terugweg is van de route.
Dus ook de terugroute bevat meestal forward, zeker als het eenrichting wegen betreft.
backward op een eenrichting weg betekent: ga tegen de richting in. Dat kan nooit de bedoeling zijn.
Verder begint de terugroute altijd op hetzelfde splitspunt als waar de heenrichting begint en gaat tegen de rijrichting in.

Knooppunten krijgen altijd de tag network:type=node_network
Ik heb het een en ander aangepast.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Dolar (2022-06-07 11:17:31+00:00): Oke, hartelijk dank voor de uitleg Dick. Helder. gr. Dolar
Honey Fombuena (2022-06-03 15:12:41+00:00): Hi, please correct capitalization of names. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883060
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:14:46+00:00): Hi,

der Tag "name" ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht.

Für Hinweise an andere Mapper sollte "note" verwendet werden. Für Hinweise an z.B. Nutzer der Karte ist "description" gedacht.

Könntest du auch noch ein "check_date=yyyy-mm-dd" hinzufügen? Dann kann man "vergessene" Baustellen leichter finden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883063
SHARCRASH (2022-06-14 18:51:15+00:00): I had checked if the cars have enough space in case of two cars crossing eachother, there is room, hence why i thought "lane" would fit better but with a second thought for trucks i have doubts, so yeah i assume you are right. Sorry!
fabiotofy (2022-06-10 13:04:23+00:00): però così abbiamo anche perso l'informazione sul numero civico. un peccato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883354
Honey Fombuena (2022-06-03 15:12:20+00:00): Hi, please correct capitalization of names. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883426
Honey Fombuena (2022-06-03 15:10:40+00:00): Hi, please correct capitalization of names. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883734
Honey Fombuena (2022-06-03 15:10:46+00:00): Hi, please correct capitalization of names. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121883734
SaltNic (2022-06-03 09:04:15+00:00): 멀쩡한 장소를 삭제함 아이디 알려질까봐 

아이디 삭제하면서 삭제하는 치졸한놈
CjMalone (2022-06-22 10:20:03+00:00): Hey, I don't think Post Office Ltd operate this post office, it's a franchise to Central.
Honey Fombuena (2022-06-03 15:09:53+00:00): Hi, please correct capitalization of names. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121884050
ToniE (2022-06-03 09:06:13+00:00): Wohl eher entlang des südlichen Teils der Haupstraße
eggie (2022-06-03 12:38:30+00:00): Hi .. You are asking for feedback.. Seems okay to me.

Greetz
eggie
*abq* (2022-11-03 08:51:43+00:00): Hallo Remy,
du hast am Epic Trail vom Jakobshorn runter die sac_scale entfernt. Ist dieser Weg mittlerweile für Wanderer gesperrt oder weshalb hast du das getan?
VG Reiner
Remy Horn (2022-11-03 08:56:48+00:00): Hallo Reiner
Der Alps Epic Trail wurde diesen Sommer räumlich entflechtet. Es gibt nun einen Weg für Biker und einen separaten für Wanderer. Teilweise teilen sie sich jedoch noch den gleichen Weg (im oberen Teil).
Remy Horn (2022-11-03 08:57:14+00:00): Bei Fragen erreichst du mich unter 081 415 21 79