piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToeBee (2015-10-26 23:47:23+00:00): Hey Scott, welcome to OpenStreetMap.  

Thanks for the new road! Note that we prefer un-abbreviated road types. It's a lot easier to automatically shorten things (Street -> St) as opposed to correctly expanding things (St -> Street or Saint? Dr -> Drive or Doctor? etc) I went ahead and expanded "Ln" to "Lane" :)
ToeBee (2015-10-27 23:18:59+00:00): And I totally typo'd the word "Lane" yesterday. Oops. Fixed now.
GerdP (2015-10-28 07:12:04+00:00): please review ways 
way 33715985,way 377070061
The tag
highway=unclassified;residential
was invalid, I've changed that to highway=unclassified
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34919799
Skippern (2016-06-14 19:38:59+00:00): Do onde voce ha informação sobre mudança de ref nesse rodovia? Segundo DER-ES dados oficiais esse rodovia premanence como ES-375, em vez do ES-345 como voce mapeiou.
ampcosta22 (2016-06-14 19:49:20+00:00): Eu alterei a referencia?
Skippern (2016-06-14 19:51:13+00:00): Vou precisar verificar cada objeto para ver se for voce, no Iconha ultimo edit desses objetos for voce, quando eu importei todos rodovias ES com relações tava certo.
ampcosta22 (2016-06-14 19:53:45+00:00): Geralmente eu só altero o traçado das vias de acordo com dados gravados do gps.
Skippern (2016-06-14 19:59:28+00:00): Bom, com esses mudanças eu vou notar que preciso fazer um volta por Iconha com GPS e Mapillary, agora o mapa com certeza tem erro como rodovia e referenciado por 2 ref estaduais diferente e passa Iconha com 2 trechos diferente
ampcosta22 (2016-06-14 20:08:02+00:00): Por mim, se vc achar alguma incorreção, sinta-se a vontade para corrigir.
Skippern (2016-06-14 20:30:07+00:00): Primeiro preciso fazer levantamento/survey, vai demorar algum semanas para ter tempo ir pra la.
maraf24 (2015-10-27 23:25:37+00:00): Proszę używać podkładu Geoportalu, a nie Binga.
Wybór jest w edytorze po naciśnięciu B.
MissingCSAA (2015-10-30 21:02:42+00:00): Flagging this change by Reno Editor. In Las Vegas, directionals come before the street name *except* for Las Vegas Boulevard, which is Las Vegas Boulevard North and Las Vegas Boulevard South.
Supaplex (2015-10-27 04:56:53+00:00): 這棟應該只有一樓是店面吧，樓上也是周家包子嗎？
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-01-23 09:26:47+00:00): Hi toSc, what do you mean by faulty upload ? It would have been nice to discuss it beforehand.
toSc (2016-03-21 23:44:14+00:00): Dear, if you feel like making pedestrian-areas out of streets please do so, I can only encourage that. But please find the decadency to go from building to building, street by street. Rather than overlapping buildings with a quick drawn multi-polygon..
So please understand that people see this as careless and even faulty.
Rgds, tosc
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-03-26 11:07:49+00:00): I don't understand what you mean about overlapping buildings.
I carefully drew the pedestrian area, as best as I could. 
Please respect other's efforts, and do not blame publicly others without talking to them and try to understand how and why something went wrong beforehand. 
Please understand that it is view as rogue and not polite.
Lastly, nobody is perfect, not even you.
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-03-26 11:51:56+00:00): I reviewed my changes and think I understood what you mean. Indeed, I could have drew it more precisely. However, even if I slightly modified some polygon originally drew by you, most of the polygon is entirely new and while not perfect didn't broke anything.
This upload - announced on the mailing list, if you care to participate or read it - was intended to be ready for the very first day of the "piétonnier mayeur", not as a finished and polished work. Thanks for having this done later.
So, please, could you modify your comment or at least formulate excuses ? Thanks.
toSc (2016-03-27 13:31:04+00:00): Ok Matthieu, I'm so sorry about my comments.
But believe me, nobody's perfect, even not a touchy mapper who can't tolerate others comments and so has to change his name..

Keep up the good work ;-)
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-03-27 13:59:21+00:00): Yep - I changed it to my real name just because I was so ashamed of what I did.
Ko'au (2015-10-27 23:23:13+00:00): Thanks for helping to add the buildings in 'Eua. It's a shame that the two images aren't both hi res.
kreuzschnabel (2019-12-01 18:41:10+00:00): Das Fußgängerrouting funktioniert so wirklich super: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.38239%2C7.76865%3B51.38259%2C7.76878#map=19/51.38301/7.76837 :-(
 
Separates Fußwegmapping erfordert sehr viel Sorgfalt, viele virtuelle Verbindungen zum Straßen-Überqueren, und ist ziemlich fehleranfällig, wenn der nächste Mapper daran arbeitet, ohne sich vorher gründlich hineinzudenken.
srividya_c (2015-10-28 05:17:26+00:00): https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3423533/10780193/d65f3f34-7d60-11e5-9eb8-8ff5a5e30aca.png
Endres Pelka (2015-10-28 23:10:43+00:00): Another dirty advertiser. Stop it!
eggie (2018-02-24 07:37:51+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze.. Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

*( Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits.
jlcod (2015-10-27 11:31:14+00:00): Hallo,
Auf highway=residential ist hgv=yes schon impliziert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany). Mit hgv=delivery wäre nur Lieferverkehr erlaubt. Die Schilder dazu habe ich vor kurzem dort noch nicht gesehen, wäre auch etwas seltsam im Industriegebiet.
contargo_pjn (2015-10-30 07:53:11+00:00): Sorry, werde das asap wieder ändern.
jlcod (2015-10-30 00:39:21+00:00): Hallo, 
auch hier nochmal (da beim Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34897167 keine Reaktion auf den Kommentar kam), hgv=delivery ist nur korrekt, wenn die Verkehrszeichen 253 und 1026-35 (http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=253,1026-35) vorhanden sind, was hier zumindest vor Kurzem noch nicht der Fall war. korrekt wäre ohne Verbotsschild hgv=yes, was aber redundant wäre, da es bereits durch highway=residential impliziert ist. Daher bitte die eingefügten hgv=delivery entfernen, wenn es keine entsprechende Beschilderung gibt. 
Dankeschön!
mueschel (2016-04-03 12:52:02+00:00): Hallo Lübeck,
in diesem und anderen Changesets hast du destination:forward:ref an insgesamt 110 Wegen ergänzt. Der richtige Key wäre aber destination:ref:forward - es gilt immer Key:Subkey:Suffix, deswegen kommt :forward nach :ref.
Außerdem fehlt an einigen Stellen das Leerzeichen im Wert (B12 -> B 12).
Würdest du da mal drüberschauen?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fqI

Gruß, Jan
Gehrke (2015-12-02 11:45:27+00:00): Doch genau das ist "Kirchspiel" - ein Präfix. Präfixe wie "Stadt" oder "Hansestadt" sind auch Teil des Namens ("Gemeinde" ist kein Präfix, sondern Typ der Gebietskörperschaft"). Das ist für DE überall in OSM so. 
DESTATIS führt diese Gemeinde auch als "Garding, Kirchspiel", eben weil "Kirchspiel" (nur) ein Präfix ist.
Fischkopp0815 (2015-12-02 16:05:40+00:00): Überschrift der Hauptsatzung:
"Hauptsatzung der Gemeinde Kspl. Garding (Kreis Nordfriesland)"

http://www.amt-eiderstedt.de/media/custom/1840_1571_1.PDF?1381319330

Ortschild bei Mapillary,etwas verpixelt aber noch erkennbar.
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/fdKR0ulRW9ULBMPqbd9pSA/photo

Ich bleibe bei meiner Meinung, "Kirchspiel" gehört zu name wie das "Sankt" in "Sankt Peter-Ording"
Gehrke (2015-12-02 16:15:08+00:00): Ich halte es für möglich, dass Du Recht hast (und SH an DESTATIS falsche Infos liefert). Aber sicher bin ich nicht.
Das Ortsschild sagt wenig über den "echten" Namen (ohne "Titel"/Präfix), vgl. z.B.
http://www.runnersworld.de/sixcms/media.php/12/thumbnails/Ortsschild%20Uslar.jpg
In den Hauptsatzungen kommt auch häufig das Präfix bei Namensnennungen mit vor.

Vielleicht fragst Du mal im Kirchspiel Garding direkt nach, ob die meinen, dass DESTATIS falsche Daten hat.
Olga | Yanosik (2015-10-27 14:46:37+00:00): Właśnie chciałam ją znów zamknąć, dzięki za czujność :)
eggie (2020-05-28 12:14:34+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
sashazykov (2015-11-21 06:10:10+00:00): Привет. Вы удалили одну из остановок на маршруте автобуса №112: станция Южная – «Машиностроитель». Это сознательно сделано или случайно?
sashazykov (2015-11-21 06:23:43+00:00): Удалили остановку «деревня Бабка» по пути из города — http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3571942759
Allroads (2016-11-10 11:25:40+00:00): I did not know Bag aerial photo, where do we get this one how is it licensed?
LafarM (2017-08-11 20:11:33+00:00): Cześć,
Proszę nie zmieniaj błędnie tagów na przejściach.
W przypadku tego przejścia kontrolowanego światłami na ul. Głębokiej prawidłowe tagi to:
highway=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals
crossing_ref=zebra

Jak masz pytania to pytaj. Też mi podpowiedzieli inni jak robiłem błędy. 

Pozdrawiam,
Rafał
LafarM (2017-08-11 20:12:19+00:00): Zapomniałem dodać, że poprawiłem tagi na tym przejściu.
pratikyadav (2015-10-29 07:20:20+00:00): That is so nice. Thank you for adding kannada names.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-01-13 08:51:52+00:00): Thanks. @pratikyadav
BCNorwich (2015-10-27 13:15:42+00:00): Email sent explaining the problems with this changeset.
GerdP (2015-10-30 18:53:05+00:00): please review node 583763607:
the tag highway=trunk
is for ways, what did you try to map?
MKnight (2015-11-05 12:49:11+00:00): Du hast hier etliche Gebäude doppelt eingefügt. So wie es aussieht hast Du ein Changeset 2 Mal hochgeladen, warum?
MKnight (2015-11-05 13:32:16+00:00): revertiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34901880
MKnight (2015-11-05 13:35:44+00:00): Herrje, bei der Prüfung übersehen, dass da etliche nicht doppelte Gebäude dabei sind. Mache das revert rückgängig und lösche dann manuell...
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-11-06 19:09:47+00:00): Are there really four post offices in Elvington Industrial Estate?
Locator (2015-11-07 00:09:16+00:00): No, hurried use of copy tags. Sorry. Now removed. Thanks for keeping me right.
buhahohe (2015-10-27 12:14:24+00:00): マウスで触っただけの部分が登録されたが削除できないのだろうか？
GerdP (2015-11-01 21:07:16+00:00): please review:
you added a few nodes with "highway=traffic_signals " (trailing blank!)
I've combined them to one in the middle, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35021571
and 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Gazer75 (2017-03-31 15:10:35+00:00): Please do not alter road class in countries you do not know. All E routes and national roads in Norway are classed as trunk road in OSM.
muralito (2016-02-03 20:18:12+00:00): Hola. ¿pusiste los surcos como "highway=track?
GerdP (2015-10-28 08:05:26+00:00): bitte prüfen:
highway=tunnel ist unüblich.
stattdessen vielleicht highway=path und tunnel=yes verwenden.
way 376989256,way 377133031
soemisch (2015-10-29 06:18:33+00:00): Hallo Gerd,

danke für den Hinweis, ich habe diesen Tag wie auch die Definition des Fahrstuhls korrigiert. Ich habe schon nach dem Hochladen gemerkt, dass ich diese beiden Fehler gemacht habe.

Viele Grüße, Lars
GerdP (2015-10-29 08:23:08+00:00): okay, danke für die Rückmeldung :-)
t_ja (2015-10-27 20:56:01+00:00): Ahoj, pozrel som si vykonane zmeny a s niektorymi nie celkom suhlasim:
1) cesta popri rieke Kysuca smerom na Ochodnicu nie je cesta III. triedy, aspon SSC ju tak neeviduje. Ak je realne oznacena cedulkou, poprosim doplnit dane cislo do tagu "ref", inak vratit spaet na "unclassified".
2) do tagu "name" nepatria opisy typu "ihrisko s umelym povrchom". Ak nieco sa neda vyjadrit tagom, treba to pridat ako komentar, napr. "comment=umely povrch". Ak to najde niekto, kto to bude vediet otagovat, zmaze tag comment a prida vhodny.
3) ak je uz ihrisko zakreslene ako plocha, je zbytocne pridavat doprostred tejto plochy bod, ktory ma rovnake tagy ako plocha.
4) nazvy ako "COOP Jednota", "Slovenska posta" nepatria do tagu "name", ale do tagu "operator".
5) v niektorom inom changesete som si vsimol, ze bol odstraneny bod "Obecny urad" (cim sa zmazala aj cela jeho historia) a nasledne bol pridany novy bod s rovnakym nazvom. Niektori "menej tolerantni" mapperi (aj taki su) by to mohli brat ako vandalizmus, co by v extremnom pripade (ak by sa to vyskytovalo castejsie) mohlo skoncit s revertom vsetkych zmien, co by nebol prinos pre OSM. 
5) v nadvaznosti na prechadzajuci bod: predtym bol "Obecný úrad" pekne s diakritikou, teraz uz nie je :(

Zvysok zmien je na prvy pohlad v poriadku, co je az podozrive na niekoho, kto sa zaregistroval do OSM prave dnes ;)
Z toho usudzujem, ze nie je potrebne posielat odkazy na OSM wiki...

Mapovaniu zdar!
retepO (2015-10-28 09:45:33+00:00): Ahoj, vdaka za upresnenia a povzbudenie do dalsej prace :-)
1) Obec Dunajov vedie rokovania so Zilinskym VUC o pre transformovani prislusnej cesty na cestu 3.triedy a prevod do vlastnictva VUC. Zrejme to bude este zdlhavy proces a trochu som to chcel urychlit. Problemom je, ze niektore navigacie (v standardnej konfiguracii) nezohladnuju tuto cestu pri vyhladavani optimalnej trasy z/do obce Dunajov a zbytocne ludi neznalych miestnych pomerov posiela cez Krasno nad Kysucou, co je cca 7km naviac.
5) Pri "kontrole" vysledku prace som si vsimol niektore udaje zdvojene a pri naprave som zrejme omylom zmazal povodny Tag namiesto mojho. Ak ide vratit povodny Tag, tak ta mozem poprosit o vykonanie "undo", pripadne strucne popisat ako to mozem spravit sam.
V internetovych zalezitostiach uprednostnujem pisanie bez diakritiky, co je mozno v niektorych momentoch nie prave idealne :-)
geri-oc (2017-06-29 07:41:51+00:00): Die Adresse der Fuchsbar wurde geändert. Warum?
addr:city=Rostock (s.a. PLZ)

Habe es zurückgesetzt - leider erst heute bemerkt. (Man kann auch fragen, wenn etwas unklar ist - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 )
zarl (2016-06-06 06:52:00+00:00): Hi, 

du hast am https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3295045664 traffic_signals:direction=backward eingetragen, was aber nicht eindeutig ist, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:traffic_signals:direction#Tagging

Sollte man so einen speziellen Tag nicht vielleicht auch mit einer entsprechenden note ausstatten (gesetzt den Fall, der Node war damals nur auf einem highway), wenn man schon "knowledge" als Quelle angibt?
LaniusCollurio (2022-07-15 07:58:26+00:00): Ciao, lo toglierei non è solo horrible, secondo me non esiste proprio più
GerdP (2015-10-28 09:29:07+00:00): please review way 142896799

highway=residential;living_street
is invalid. Consider to use JOSM as an editor, that helps to avoid this problem.
kshuseyin (2015-10-28 17:39:43+00:00): Ok. I work in this location yet. over. Thank you for the suggestion, I'll try
Alex3271 (2015-11-04 00:27:03+00:00): Hello pascal_cyclist! :-)
It seems that you unfortunately deleted the new bypass of Kato Nevrokopi which was added a few months ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32529511
Note that the new road cannot be seen on the satellite images yet.
Maybe your deletion should be reverted. Of course I'd like to ask you if you see any reasons against it?
Regards,
Alex3271
woodpeck_repair (2015-11-04 14:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35079922 where the changeset comment is: erroneous edit - revert by request of user
GerdP (2015-11-05 13:59:46+00:00): @Alex3271:
The tag highway=tour is rarely used,
if you know better what it is, please change it. The word tour doesn't mention the vehicle. I assume it is a highway=path,bicycle=yes,foot=yes ?
The same tag is used here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368900734
pascal_cyclist (2015-11-05 16:38:21+00:00): This is not my work. I don't konw what it is and simply deleted it. Thanks for your critical investigation. People like you really help this tool to become excellent! And I really mean that!
GerdP (2015-11-06 07:31:08+00:00): @pascal_cyclist:
Just to make sure:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368900734
You have deleted this way again. I am not a local, so I have no idea if that way exists and how it looks like.
I just tried to point out that the tag highway=tour should not be used
for any way.
GerdP (2015-10-28 06:52:51+00:00): please review way 377154735:
the tag highway=parh looks like a typo for path,
but isn't it a highway=service;service=driveway?
josmougn (2015-10-29 00:49:33+00:00): I am going to correct it. It's too short and too narrow to be a driveway and there is no access to the cars. I'll keep it as a path.
GerdP (2015-10-29 08:21:46+00:00): okay, thanks
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 08:55:07+00:00): Can you explain meaning of source:maxspeed=practical ?

See say https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172286400/history
miguel111 (2025-07-31 15:11:44+00:00): The maximum speed given in the maxspeed tag is the normal speed at which cars drive on the road. The speed that is legally allowed is higher, but practically unattainable. This helps a lot for proper navigation.
In this case, the legal speed is 50 but the practical speed is only 30.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 20:44:19+00:00): So it should be moved to maxspeed:practical (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:practical ) and maxspeed should contain legal speed limit, right?
Rps333 (2016-05-12 12:08:23+00:00): Should also be tagged "military"?
SomeoneElse (2016-03-26 14:33:10+00:00): Hi - some of the buildings in this changeset seem to be exact duplicates of buildings in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380244507 .  I've deleted them in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38083409 .
Hope this is OK - let me know if there are any questions.
Best Regards,
Andy
5m4u9 (2015-10-27 20:39:54+00:00): En las estaciones de servicio y otros nodos sólo utilizar el nombre y no su tipo de negocio. Es redundante.
Peilscheibe (2015-10-27 21:49:42+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset sind Nodes verschoben worden, die eher nicht verschoben werden sollten (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34907883). Bitte guckt da nochmal drüber.
Peilscheibe (2015-10-30 18:02:26+00:00): Revertiert, Begründung siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34977798
Constable (2017-01-25 18:20:12+00:00): Ciao, noto che hai fatto lacune modifiche alla mappa in questa zona, vorrei segnalarti però che ci sono parecchie "strade" non connesse tra loro, ad esempio questo punto (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3805456796), dovrebbe essere un incrocio tra le due strade sterrate ma, così com'è adesso, non lo è.
Se hai bisogno di aiuto chiedi pure o fai un tutorial http://learnosm.org/it/ o leggi una guida introduttiva ad openstreetmap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale per favore.
Grazie per la collaborazione.
Nel frattempo sto cercando di connettere tutte le strade/sentieri della zona che non lo sono.
Ciao
Sanniu (2017-06-28 07:13:33+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374692783 - is it roundabout?
ratrun (2017-06-28 15:42:46+00:00): Yes, it looks like a roundabout. I changed it now.
Jojo4u (2015-10-28 11:58:31+00:00): Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23553288 : ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3782313822 nicht mehr durchgestrichen?

LG Joachim
Peilscheibe (2015-11-01 21:23:37+00:00): Doch, da war zum Besichtigungszeitpunkt noch buntes Klebeband drauf.
GerdP (2015-10-28 06:57:07+00:00): please review: your merge produced the
invalid tag
highway=residential;tertiary
This is likely to happen with iD, so take care!
I've changed it to 
highway=tertiary
aoeui (2015-10-28 13:01:22+00:00): Thanks!
MarkusHD (2015-11-03 20:21:38+00:00): Datenverlust beim Deuerer: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2020077714
MarkusHD (2016-01-09 19:13:20+00:00): Fehler nun selbst behoben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36469319
Cecilie Brekke (2015-10-27 17:55:26+00:00): added a part of a mainroad and some minor paths
TheClem (2015-10-27 18:01:18+00:00): Fixed geometry of FIMM, Biomedicum 2U building
richlv (2016-08-08 09:23:58+00:00): hi there. this import has also added nodes with lithuanian names in latvia (and they are duplicates at a wrong position) - please check that further imports don't spill too much :)
GerdP (2015-10-28 07:05:28+00:00): please review way 377180789:
I've changed highway=tre to track
muralito (2015-10-28 13:29:46+00:00): thanks. it was a mistake.
MarkusHD (2015-11-03 20:17:21+00:00): Warum wird Kössler's Bäckerei hier gelöscht und als neuer node angelegt und dabei noch ein Fehler eingebaut? Die Historie der POIs soll wenn möglich erhalten bleiben, daher ist auch das Übertragen von Punkten aufs Gebäude unter vielen Mappern verpönt.
MarkusHD (2016-01-09 19:10:29+00:00): Alten node wiederhergestellt: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36469189
ToeBee (2015-10-27 18:58:52+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding an address to the map. I will note that we don't typically name individual homes in OSM. The address is definitely valuable information though.
fserges (2015-11-10 12:51:11+00:00): Почему Каринское сельское поселение стало admin_level=9 (территориальный отдел городского округа)?
RezoVlad (2015-11-10 15:24:13+00:00): Вы совершенно правы!
Как-то не разобравшись до конца, поставил В Горкинском (и автоматом как граничащие) Каринскому 9-й уровень.
Конечно же должен быть 8-й.
fserges (2015-11-10 15:30:01+00:00): Спасибо за ответ!
Bianca Handley (2015-10-27 19:05:08+00:00): I made some main roads and marked residential areas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
elgolfo (2018-03-22 23:04:14+00:00): Hi d201511,

ich habe mir mal erlaubt den von dir damals gemappten Blitzer so zu mappen, wie du es wahrscheinlich vorhattest:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57440481

Grüße
Moritz
Sowa1980 (2021-01-18 19:22:18+00:00): Анатолий скажи сколько можно лепить парковки на всю дорого , у тебя что парковка прям по проезжей части идет?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
Dmytro O (2015-12-24 18:56:43+00:00): There is C-12 sign before Rondo. So it is runabout.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-12-25 18:07:54+00:00): C-12 sign is for circular traffic, not oncly for roundabouts ("ruch okrężny oznacza, że na skrzyżowaniu ruch odbywa się dookoła wyspy lub placu w kierunku wskazanym na znaku"). junction=roundabout is supposed to be used for roundabouts ("road junction where the traffic goes around a non-traversable island (or a void in case of elevated roads) in the middle, and the traffic on the roundabout has right of way").  As http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations proves that deciding whatever something is roundabout or not is tricky (though this case is not mentioned). It is also possible that I am wrong and it should be discussed further, with wider audience...
sdoerr (2015-10-27 22:58:25+00:00): Well, Mass is said there on the first Saturday of each month (according to parish mag) - not sure if that's enough to qualify!
cadsauxk (2016-01-04 20:56:08+00:00): Em Prados, você inseriu uma "Rua Marta Costa" esquina com "Rua Maria Costa". Afinal, é "Marta" ou "Maria"? E qual é a origem dos seus dados? Obrigado.
dmfr (2024-04-20 14:16:46+00:00): Olá! Podes esclarecer porque é que a way 377201906 e outras estradas à volta estão com access=permissive? Parece-me um erro.