piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:31:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112563283
mapper377 (2021-10-16 12:06:50+00:00): This changeset's source tags should also include "survey".
michael60101 (2021-10-31 01:48:18+00:00): Hello, the image isn't visible. Would it be possible to update the link to include a link from the hosting service instead of your computer's file directory?
C Merfield (2021-10-31 02:14:01+00:00): Thanks michael60634

I thought the image had been uploaded to OSM.  I'm a novice user and I have not been able to find the the hosting service or anything in the help systems or a web search.  How do I upload my photo to the hosting service?  Many thanks.  Charles
michael60101 (2021-10-31 18:30:31+00:00): I saw that you are using Dropbox. Here is how to create a sharable link for a file uploaded to Dropbox:

https://help.dropbox.com/files-folders/share/share-with-others

Simply paste this link in the box for the "image" tag.
C Merfield (2021-10-31 20:02:58+00:00): Thanks michael60634

Hmm, sharing a file from my private dropbox is not great for me - I keep my cloud drives mostly empty due to the enegy cost of running them so if I did share from them I'd likely want to delete the file at some point, so that is not a permanant solution.  If the file cant be hosted on the OSM system then best I just remove the sign from the map.
◪ Jarv (2021-10-16 22:03:42+00:00): Hi Adrion, just a heads up that when specifying destination road numbers use destination:ref:lanes instead of destination:lanes. destination:lanes should only include place destinations rather than route numbers.
Cheers, Thomas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112563802
eserte (2021-10-20 17:42:21+00:00): Ist das Tagging für den Radweg korrekt? Es erscheint nämlich kein Radweg mehr bei CyclOSM...
gscholz (2021-10-17 05:56:01+00:00): Hi JEMA6498,
this changeset has massively added errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51417&lat=-25.27647&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

I am wondeering how this could happen as you are using JOSM and this edotor normaly shows warning or even error messages if you try to upload these errors.

You have also added area attibutes to the single nodes of your areas.

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gpserror (2021-12-10 16:46:42+00:00): This has a lot of broken polygons in it.  I think I may have to undo my manual hand fix (maproulette, changeset 114769896) in order for you to systemically fix this.
gscholz (2021-10-17 05:55:56+00:00): Hi JEMA6498,
this changeset has massively added errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51417&lat=-25.27647&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

I am wondeering how this could happen as you are using JOSM and this edotor normaly shows warning or even error messages if you try to upload these errors.

You have also added area attibutes to the single nodes of your areas.

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-10-19 04:19:54+00:00): Hi JEMA6498,
can I get your response here? Those errors still exist!
Guido
kartonage (2021-12-08 14:40:11+00:00): From what I gathered this seems like an undiscussed and poorly done import where data from "tallerc9" was not appropriately checked before uploaded. 

Since there were a few people involved it also seems to be the case that this was done via a mapathon. Unfortunately all involved seem also not interested in discussion.

I am going to try to contact MapPyOSM and see if they can chime in and get this fixed.
gscholz (2021-12-09 05:53:27+00:00): Hi kartonage,
thanks for your involvement.
Guido
gpserror (2021-12-10 16:48:30+00:00): I did not realize the extent of the import problems and started to hand fix for maproulette in changeset 114769896 - I will revert my change so this changeset can be fixed in another way
mueschel (2021-10-18 10:26:30+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
This building got a strange "Brgy." tag - could you explain what this means?
ianlopez1115 (2021-10-18 13:54:38+00:00): It refers to the Barangay (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barangay) where the clinic is located. The Brgy. tag can be modified to either addr:quarter or addr:neighbourhood depending on the barangay's size in urban/urbanized areas
ivanbranco (2021-11-10 20:28:49+00:00): Barangay are added in this area as place=quarter (see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3739167012) so it should be changed with an addr:place=276 or an addr:quarter=276. Since the Wiki says that: "addr:place should not be used together with addr:street=*", only addr:quarter fits (I suppose, this tags in not in the Wiki list, but it has 92.203 uses as far). The problem is that this brgy is not mapped. If you know approximately the area you could add it yourself maybe? So we can change this tag (used only in this node) with a more standard addr:quarter=276 :)
Jarek 🚲 (2021-11-30 03:25:04+00:00): Hello, thank you for your edits in this area, the alignment improvements are much appreciated!

I noticed in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112564262 you moved the Dundas West subway platforms to be roughly centered under the namesake street. That's not actually accurate, they are mostly east of the street. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109959238 for explanations. I moved them into a slightly more proper position in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114383828 .
dellisd (2021-12-18 18:05:33+00:00): You're right, thank you for fixing that!
tonyf1 (2021-10-16 04:10:33+00:00): wrong, fixed #112564763
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 09:57:45+00:00): При создании POI точек задумайтесь, что эта точка на карте даёт людям.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112564792
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 12:59:10+00:00): Тут что-то непонятное. Зачем две дороги в одном месте? Пожалуйста, читайте вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Если лень изучать, то просто опишите ситуацию в ТГ-чате RU OSM:  @ruosm
Уверен, вам помогут и отредактируют доступ.

Не понимая, что вы делаете, вы наносите ущерб карте.
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 12:49:25+00:00): Улица в адрес пишется со статусной частью, т.е. "Александровская улица";
"Омское сельское поселение" - это не наименование НП, во-певых, а во-вторых, дома уже находятся внутри отношения "Омское сельское поселение" и автоматически наследуют эту часть адреса. В большинстве случаев достаточно указания улицы и номера дома, остальная часть наследуется из отношений административных границ городов и областей.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112565926
Reza Babri (2021-10-16 07:11:32+00:00): سلام آقا کاوه
خدا قوت
تا اونجا که ممکنه سعی کنید نقاط و قله های ثبت شده را پاک نکنید و در صورت نیاز فقط آنها را جابجا یا اصلاح کنید.
اینطوری، سابقه اصلاحات سایر کاربران هم برای اون نقطه حفظ میشه و از بین نمیره.

ارادت
kaveh2018 (2021-10-16 14:06:14+00:00): سلام چشم ، اینجا فقط جا به جا کردم و تغیر ارتفاع ، دیروز قله بودم و اصلاح کردم
hsc666 (2021-10-19 08:38:28+00:00): Hier hast Du Wege gelöscht, die lt. Deinem CS-Kommentar nur gesperrt sind. Wenn die Wege tatsächlich noch existieren, könnte man die Sperrung über entsprechende access-Tags eintragen. In dem Fall würde ich die Wege wiederherstellen wollen und entsprechend aktualisieren. Wie ist die Situation vor Ort tatsächlich?
eggie (2021-10-17 16:55:44+00:00): Dag Marein.. Loopt hier werkelijk een apart voetpad?  Je kunt een voetpad ook opnemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan (busway hier) met sidewalk-left (of right) Licht aan de richting van de weg.
Maak altijd een verbinding bij kruisende wegen ook al mag je niet links of recht afslaan.
Ik heb twee verbindingesnodes toegevoegd.
Je path staat op access=no. Beter geen combinaties maken met foot=yes en access=no
Dan beter vehicle=no toevoegen
MVG
eggie
Marein (2021-10-24 18:28:41+00:00): Hoi eggie,
Bedankt voor je feedback!
Er loopt langs de busbaan een voetpad. Een deel ervan stond al op OSM, dat is zandpad is en ligt iets verder van de busbaan. Het gedeelte dat ik heb toegevoegd loopt direct langs de busbaan, gescheiden door de vangrail. Kan dat dan beter met die sidewalk tag?
De kruisende weg die ik heb toegevoegd over de busbaan bestaat niet echt als zodanig. In het oosten is het een olifantenpaadje langs een heg. Het westelijke deel ervan is een provisorische oversteek over de twee busbanen, zodat je bij het pad langs de busbaan kan komen. Is er een betere manier om dit weer te geven?
De routing werkt nu in ieder geval wel zoals ik zou verwachten, en dat is ook hoe het door veel mensen wordt gebruikt, dus dat is mooi!
Groetjes
eggie (2021-10-24 18:52:47+00:00): Fag Marein.. Soms is het schipperen en maken we zo'n oversteek voor de routering.
Dat kan dan niet anders.
Een pad dat door gebruik is ontstaan kun je een extra tag meegeven informal=yes...
Paden die direct aan de weg liggen.. trottoirs.. kun je opnemen met sidewalk=right left of both.
Hier ligt dacht ik vangrails dus die kun je wel apart intekenen 
Up to you als local mapper..
Gr eggie
Marein (2021-10-24 19:09:01+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb de tags verbeterd!
Famlam (2022-02-20 21:56:27+00:00): Dag Marein, gegeven dat er bij mijn weten nog altijd C16 (verboden voor voetgangers) aan beide zijden van het pad staan, haal ik deze foot=* tags er weer vanaf. Het bestaan van het pad is echter inderdaad waar (al sinds zo lang ik mij kan herinneren worden er af en toe voetgangers bekeurd :) )

Zie o.a. (slecht te zien, maar de enige foto die ik kon vinden die nà deze discussie gemaakt is) helemaal links tussen de bomen op https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=599131124572085 en (van de andere kant) een paar weken voor deze discussie: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=156258026645414

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117656047
kartler175 (2021-10-17 14:08:51+00:00): Are you arware of the impacts of your edits on different relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-66.95407&lat=45.00733&zoom=11&opacity=0.95&overlays=ring_not_closed,touching_rings,role_should_be_inner,role_should_be_outer,inner_with_same_tags,ways

Do you use the JOSM Validator?
DENelson83 (2021-10-17 19:41:44+00:00): I have been using Ctrl+Alt+D in JOSM in a bid to catch any relations I might have affected and make sure they remained intact.  Obviously several relations fell through the cracks, and I intend to fix those with the aid of the OSM Inspector.
aharvey (2025-02-09 04:49:05+00:00): manually reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162301634 to remove proprietary data
user_8655426 (2021-10-16 09:39:42+00:00): こんばんは。
浜松市内の道路の修正、ありがとうございます。しかし残念なことに、この変更セット内で新しい道路が数本削除されています。それらの道路は地理院地図や地理院オルソにはありませんが、Bing, Maxar, Mapbox にははっきりと写っています。
国土地理院の画像にないからといって、既存のデータを安易に削除しないようお願いいたします。

・JA:安楽椅子マッピング 「画像は間違っていることがあります！」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:安楽椅子マッピング

・JA:画像の利用
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:画像の利用
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112567637
ElvenJp (2021-10-24 02:36:56+00:00): 確かにコストコ南側の道路など、間違って修正しておりました。大変お手数おかけしました。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
rickmastfan67 (2021-10-18 02:30:01+00:00): Dude, these ramps aren't open yet.  This interchange was only partially opened.  The only moments that are open (till Spring 2022) are I-79 NB -> PA-576 WB & PA-576 EB -> I-79 SB.  I've full scaled reverted this changeset, as we don't want to confuse routers with ramps that aren't even open yet.

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112632016
Владимир К (2021-12-05 17:19:58+00:00): Добрый день! 
На этом участке есть велополоса? или специальный знак для лошадей?

Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с документацией прежде, чем продолжить правки этих тегов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Владимир К (2021-12-05 17:23:48+00:00): foot=yes на дороге, вдоль которой есть тротуар тоже неверно
pitfire (2021-10-16 10:21:23+00:00): Hallo bernd,
bei mir im iD Editor tauchen die 100 maxspeed "Menzlinger Weg (993215959, v1)" innerhalb der Bebauung immer noch auf. 
Gruß pitfire
berndw (2021-10-17 08:55:21+00:00): Hmmh, seltsam, sollte eigentlich nicht mehr sein.

Naja, ich behebe den Fehler, danke für den Hinweis
berndw (2021-10-17 09:02:10+00:00): Die Ursache war wahrscheinlich, das ich einmal zuviel STRG+Z in JOSM bedient habe. Die Befehlshistorie habe ich meist nicht offen
Hb- (2023-06-26 12:16:25+00:00): Das Setzen von highway=service auf w993217703 war falsch, weil dort eben keine Zufahrt zum Parkplatz der Halle ist.  Schöne Grüße aus Bad Fallingbostel!
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-06-26 12:38:04+00:00): Willkommen im HK! :-)

Jetzt nicht mehr?
Hb- (2023-06-26 15:27:23+00:00): Feuerwehrzufahrt mit Poller und Fuß/Radverkehr, siehe #137791937
Vinber-Pro (2024-10-20 15:43:42+00:00): bonjour,
en tombant sur ces signalements par osmose, je m'aperçois qu'il y a des parfois des ref=?. à mon avis il est préférable de faire un fixme=ajouter référence, qui sera plus facilement trouvable que ref=* et visible dans certaine application par défaut.

à plus
Pastèque24 (2024-10-20 17:07:40+00:00): Bonjour, oui j'ai laissé ref=? pour que ce soit plus simple pour moi de modifier, une fois que j'aurais eu l'info sur l'identifiant. Mais si tu penses que c'est mieux de mettre l'attribut fixme, tu peux le faire si tu veux, j'y avais pas pensé quand j'ai ajouté les armoires ;)
Pastèque24 (2024-10-20 17:12:50+00:00): J'ai également la position approximative (précision à 5m) de tous les PMZ de Gironde, mais j'hésite à les placer sur OSM même avec l'attribut fixme pour l'emplacement. À la place je les ai cartographiés sur Umap http://u.osmfr.org/m/408468/
eggie (2021-10-16 09:54:44+00:00): Hi Fabrizio..

Beter tag
bicycle=use_sidepath
foot=use_sidepath

In case of traffic_sign C14  tag
bicycle=no

Greetz,
eggie
sorcrosc (2022-02-28 21:48:59+00:00): Ciao. Ti faccio notare che i civici con esponente (con le lettere in genere) si scrivono tutto attaccato nello stesso tag addr:housenumber. 
Il tag addr:unit si usa invece più raramente solo per gli interni nel caso esistano.

Grazie
gabro00 (2024-09-13 21:38:59+00:00): Szia!
Most vettem észre ezt a Hattyast. Nem a Klebelsberg-teleppel keveredik? https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klebelsberg-telep
user_11418917 (2021-10-18 16:09:44+00:00): I fixed the tag, please add the points with the right tag next time. thank you.
wkdgs (2021-10-26 15:38:22+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,

zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Beim drüberschauen sind mir noch ein paar Sachen aufgefallen, die vielleicht nochmal überarbeitet werden sollten.

Der "name"-Tag ist hauptsächlich für Eigennamen gedacht. Beschreibungen der Objekte sollten durch andere Tags erfolgen. Kann das Objekt mit vorhandenen Tags nicht ausreichend gut beschrieben werden, kann man eine kurze Beschreibung in den "description"-Tag packen.

Im Wiki findest du dazu weitere Infos:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Im Wiki findest du z.B. auch für die meisten Spielgeräte passende Tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground).

Und auch der Fußballplatz kann durch passende Tags beschrieben werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description).

Gruß
winkeldings
user_6319026 (2021-10-26 18:32:07+00:00): Hallo winkeldings,

Danke für die Manöverkritik. Das Wiki werde ich mir noch einmal ansehen. Ich hatte mir vorher andere Spielplätze angesehen wie der Name dort getaggt wurde. Dann sind die wohl auch verbesserungswürdig :-)

Grüße
wkdgs (2022-02-09 13:22:15+00:00): Nochmal eine kurze Erinnerung.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112570118
letihu (2021-10-17 19:06:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993222348/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90203338/history
übereinander gemappt ist so nicht richtig. Wer wohnt denn wo? Übereinander oder nebeneinander?
Feuerwehr Farge (2021-10-17 21:11:00+00:00): Die Polizei hat ein Büro im Erdgeschoss. Und die restlichen Räume werden von der Feuerwehren genutzt.
Feuerwehr Farge (2021-10-17 21:22:11+00:00): https://www.senatspressestelle.bremen.de/pressemitteilungen/neubau-fuer-freiwillige-feuerwehr-und-polizeistation-in-farge-uebergeben-352288?asl=bremen02.c.732.de
letihu (2021-10-18 06:19:01+00:00): Dann zeichne doch bitte das Büro als building:part ein. Dann ist es auch zu sehen.
highflyer74 (2021-10-18 08:40:51+00:00): Moinsen :-)

Wenn mehrere Dinge sich innerhalb eines Gebäudes befinden, sollten die am besten als Node (Punkt) innerhalb des Gebäudes platziert werden und nicht am Gebäude. So kann man z.B. auch ein level=* am jeweiligen POI anbringen, um zu taggen, in welchem Stockwerk sich was befindet (nicht zu verwechseln mit layer=*). Schönen Tag Euch!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Ser9ei (2021-10-18 16:03:36+00:00): Если это скульптура, то  использовать надо tourism=artwork + artwork_type=sculpture

Мемориал - это другое.
Lee Carré (2021-10-16 17:30:29+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
jmc (2021-10-16 18:38:12+00:00): Same story as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112571066.
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 15:09:09+00:00): Replied, there.
Lee Carré (2021-10-16 17:28:52+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
jmc (2021-10-16 18:37:47+00:00): This time I'm innocent -- I was using StreetComplete the way god (?) intended, but it decided to upload edits from days ago, though I had connectivity all the while and opened the app a few times in between these changes. Please take the matter with StreetComplete developers.

I'm trying to be helpful and contribute my time to populate OSM data, but if I'm going to be chased by the OSM police from here on because of a few bad StreetComplete-generated changesets, I'm probably just going to stop contributing altogether.
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 15:07:41+00:00): “This time I'm innocent”

It's your account, your choice & use of editor, your changes.

Focus on fixing the problem, rather than shifting blame.

“I was using StreetComplete the way god (?) intended, but it decided to upload edits from days ago, though I had connectivity all the while and opened the app a few times in between these changes. Please take the matter with StreetComplete developers.”

If you've really discovered a bug, then you're the one best able to describe it to said developers.

In the meantime, then refrain from using an editor in such a way as to exhibit the buggy behaviour (which affects other mappers; this is a community project, after all). Resume after the problem is fixed.

Have you checked that the configuration is suitable? The problem will likely recur if you have auto-upload enabled at all. Disable it and tell it to manually upload between areas and/or sessions.

Questions about properly using editors should be directed to their respective user-groups (or developers, if misbehaviour is suspected).

Take some responsibility for helping to improve the OSM software environment.

Being blasé toward other mappers (again; community project) is anti-social. Persistence is disruptive.
jmc (2021-10-17 15:28:03+00:00): Got it. Farewell.
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 15:28:30+00:00): “I'm trying to be helpful and contribute my time to populate OSM data”

This is a community project, with many volunteers, who are also trying to just help by donating their time. It's not merely a data project.

Enormous bounding boxes aren't helpful; they pose many problems for others. It wastes their time and distracts from (or hinders) productive work.

“if I'm going to be chased by the OSM police from here on because of a few bad StreetComplete-generated changesets, I'm probably just going to stop contributing altogether.”

If you regard other mappers asking you to contribute constructively & non-disruptively as some kind of OSM police …

Back in reality, you're spamming the changeset lists of French & British mappers with your changesets that are irrelevant to their local area.

So, if you don't want people objecting, then stop pestering them.

More generally, if you're unwilling to participate in a community, and be considerate of other mappers, then if you feel that ceasing is the best resolution, go for it.

Compare driving an unroadworthy car on public roads, and mechanical failure causing a collision. What do you think the investigating police officers would say if you claimed that it wasn't your fault because you didn't steer the car into the victims, the car did so because of said failure from neglecting maintenance?

From someone older & wiser: http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/crybaby.html#allowed “I'm not responsible for the damage: If I wasn't supposed to do that, I shouldn't have been allowed.”

“People who think this way, Come The Day, will be strait-jacketed and deposited in rubber-walled rooms, the environment best suited to their leadership potential. Permanently. Meanwhile, by raising this traditional excuse of losers and screw-ups, you've demonstrated that whatever small trust (to exercise reasonable caution) was recently bestowed on you was a grave error that shouldn't be repeated.”

A few other entries from the same section also seem relevant & likely applicable.
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 15:31:46+00:00): “Farewell”

Pity.

I'm sure that other mappers will pick up the slack, though, without the drama & butthurt.
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 10:22:04+00:00): place=locality REQUIRES name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112571457
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 12:33:41+00:00): OSM не предназначен для отзывов. тег name используется только для наименований и ничего более: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F

Были планы на запуск специального сервиса https://openplacereviews.org/, но, похоже, что-то там заглохло.

Данную правку я отредактирую. На будущее: консультируйтесь с вики или российским сообществом в ТГ: @ruosm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112571955
lasagna (2022-02-08 19:34:37+00:00): Hello again,

This changeset, like many other changes you have made over the years, changes the names of some roads and other features. As usual, you have not given any source or explanation to show that your changes reflect reality.

Like I have said at least once before, we are making a set of map data that represents reality and is verifiable ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability ).

I and other users have commented on your changesets asking for clarification, and reverted several of your changes after doing surveys and additional research.

Although some of your changes look reasonable, I am forced to assume that you do not have the same goals as the OpenStreetMap project. Your edits make the map data less accurate and waste everyone's time.

Do you have anything to say in your defense?