piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2022-06-22 05:37:57+00:00): Please note that we include the full title (usually Dr. med. xxx) in a doctors name in case he / she carries that title. No need to remove those...
highflyer74 (2022-06-22 05:40:29+00:00): An actual gain in information would be to add https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare:speciality having surveyed those places.
charlie700 (2022-07-12 10:09:44+00:00): Entsprechend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it) sollte das name-Tag keine Abkürzungen enthalten. Wie hier "Dr. med." 

Entsprechend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only sollte das name-Tag nur den Namen und keine Zusätze enthalten. 

Warum willst du von diesen dokumentierten Regeln abweichen und wo kann ich eine Dokumentation zu diesen Abweichungen finden?

Ich habe diese Namen geändert, weil ich vor Ort an diese Personen verwiesen wurde ohne dass bei ihrem Namen ein  "Dr. med."  verwendet wurde. Es wäre in dieser Form auch nur schwierig auszusprechen gewesen. Mein Ziel war, das name-Tag dem aktuellen Gebrauch anzupassen. 

Dir noch einen schönen Tag.
canfe (2022-06-28 08:37:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072071029 a me sembra più un parco che un semplice prato a sfalcio
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122683479
solenoid jam (2022-06-21 20:39:01+00:00): Всё хорошо, но с тропами в Сокольниках вы что то намудрили. С восходом солнца вышлем туда группу оперативного контроля.
somix (2022-06-22 06:24:57+00:00): А что не так? Добавил только то, что видел своими глазами
solenoid jam (2022-06-22 07:39:15+00:00): Просто некоторые из отмеченных троп существуют многие годы, а некоторые вытаптываются то тут, то там, но вскоре исчезают. Конечно можно отмечать их все, но потом придётся проверять, не заросли ли они. Да и вообще, стихийные "срезки" через газон это такой себе объект для внесения на карту.
Еще зимой некоторые тропы изменяют конфигурацию. 
В восточной части парка лыжня совпадала с тропой, но теперь лыжня разорвана. https://imgur.com/lJSC50m.png

В общем тропы - дело тонкое. Локалы встревожены )
A67-A67 (2022-06-21 20:52:05+00:00): Opnieuw teruggedraaid naar de juiste locatie komgrens, zie ook je berichten.
EBSerKartler (2023-11-22 08:10:53+00:00): Hallo Grinbert,

Dieses "Underground parking" revertiere ich gerade.
Grund:
das ist keine Tiefgarage, sondern am Hang steht ein Riegel Garagen (mit Einfahrt von unten), und darauf wurden noch ein kleines Wohnhaus und eine Garage gesetzt (beides mit  ebenerdigem Zugang von oben).
Grüße
EBSer Kartler
Trevor_1 (2022-06-21 23:36:54+00:00): This was already there, I had made a mistake while editing
richlv (2024-05-19 17:08:59+00:00): Hi, this changeset has changed isolated_dwelling to locality, for example, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2073687599/history .

As per OSM wiki, "place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location for which there is no extant feature to which the tag could be associated", this this change seems to be incorrect - was there a specific reason for that?

If not, will see about switching back to isolated_dwelling.
wwunjo (2022-06-28 05:44:11+00:00): Hi martinakd! 
Please pay attention to roads connectivity, their classification and matching to the latest satellite imagery, in this changeset you have missed crossing ways and created duplicates, these issues causing problems in OSM now, so unfortunately I have to revert your edits
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122685731
Stesaan (2022-06-21 21:13:22+00:00): Bonsoir 

Avez-vous un beau soleil 

Jacques
makmar (2022-06-22 07:11:59+00:00): Bonjour. En effet, la Grèce est synonyme de soleil et de mer.
Stesaan (2022-06-21 21:11:15+00:00): Bonsoir
Syl (2022-06-21 21:13:29+00:00): Bonsoir, vous aviez une question sur cette modification ?
Stesaan (2022-06-21 21:12:19+00:00): Bonsoir 

Avez-vous un Beau Temps 

Jacques
jimkats (2022-09-05 23:16:49+00:00): I just saw your edits of adding the nodes of the villages. Great job, really :) (was gonna do it soooomeday, same with Mani peninsula :d) (now the edits in Wikidata for Wiki Loves Monuments are much easier :P)
archpdx (2022-06-21 23:26:39+00:00): Hi,
Please be more careful when adding new features like this: this edit changed Lewis and Clark Circle and part of the boundary for Washington park to a foot path. Also, please note that we don't use the name field to describe features in OSM, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I removed the name from the path and changed Lewis and Clark Circle back to a road.
eggie (2022-07-13 21:44:57+00:00): Dag Teek..

Kijk nog eens naar je combinatie van
natural=wetland
landuse=water

Die combinatie kan niet kloppen.
Bij wetland horen andere combinaties.

Van een stuk land bij Noordstroe heb ik natural=water verwijderd.

Er zitten nog steeds (te lang m.i.)  witte stukken zonder tagging hier op Wieringen.

Ben je hier nog bezig?

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2022-06-21 23:41:28+00:00): Hello,
As well as the changes to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53100715 this also seemed to edit a river in Moscow, adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23985851 with role "outer", whch is presumably a mistake...
Supaplex (2022-06-22 02:03:48+00:00): Hi,

Could you use the local language for maritime boundary, I think it is zh-hant for the name field
BodhidharmaI (2022-06-22 23:32:48+00:00): @SomeoneElse - This was not a mistake. Goes under rubric “new/existing objects elsewhere”. The editor I use doesn’t easily allow splitting edit into multiple change sets based on geographic proximity. So sometimes edits from multiple areas accumulate and have to be committed all at once
SomeoneElse (2022-06-23 00:15:25+00:00): "outer" doesn't make much sense for a bit of a river, though?
BodhidharmaI (2022-06-23 08:37:43+00:00): Yes, it should be side_stream
Scout Jens (2022-06-22 06:02:21+00:00): Hallo George, schau Dir doch noch mal die Dokumentation zu Parkplätzen an. Viele Grüße, Jens
george1201 (2022-06-22 06:08:00+00:00): Hallo. Meinst du damit, dass ich weitere Attribute hinzufügen sollte?
Scout Jens (2022-06-22 06:20:17+00:00): Ja, ebenerdig würde sich auf jeden Fall anbieten. Und man könnte auch über straßenseitiges Parken nachdenken, wenn die Stellplätze direkt an die Fahrbahn angrenzen.
george1201 (2022-06-22 06:25:14+00:00): Ja klar. Je mehr Eigenschaften umso besser. Aber ich denke, dass es am wichtigsten ist, ein Objekt erst mal anzulegen. Ausschmücken kann man es dann immer noch. (Ich denke da z.B. an "building=yes". Das ist auch etwas mager)
Scout Jens (2022-06-22 06:44:01+00:00): Wieso als Gebäude eintragen?
george1201 (2022-06-22 07:00:39+00:00): Das Beispiel bezog sich nicht auf dieses Objekt (den Parkplatz). Ich wollte ausdrücken, dass es in der Karte viele Gebäude gibt, die nur ein "building=yes" haben.
Frans S (2022-08-31 13:19:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
tags landuse=residential is to be used at hamlets, villages etc.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122686861
willkmis (2022-06-23 20:20:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Did you intend to make these landcovers very large multipolygon relations? I think each one could probably be its own area, such large relations (like 14277075) can be difficult to work with, and they seem to overlap some existing landcovers. Also, are you mapping these based on imagery alone, or have you been to these places? I've only been around here a couple times, but I think some of these scrub areas look more like grassland to me, like near Rancho Sierra Vista (though in CA, I acknowledge the line can be pretty thin between the two)
willkmis (2022-06-23 20:43:40+00:00): I tried to neaten things (removing overlaps by adding the rock formations in Boney Mountain as inner ways, and making the multipolygons smaller) here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122775190.
Livianla (2023-09-12 07:23:54+00:00): well,https://livianla.com/
ElliottPlack (2022-07-01 16:11:16+00:00): Hi there, nice work jumping on this change, but the use of admin_level=1 is incorrect in this case. International boundaries should be admin_level=2. Level 1 is not currently used.

Some additional citations for general consumption: 

https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2022/06/boundary-dispute.html

https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2022/06/the-hans-island-peace-agreement-between-canada-denmark-and-greenland/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61801682

https://www.iflscience.com/50-year-whisky-war-ends-with-first-land-border-between-canada-and-europe-64099

Thanks,  
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
PierZen (2022-07-01 17:44:59+00:00): Hi Elliott,

you should comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122398301 where admin_level tag for way 1069440504 was modified. I myself simply cut the coastline of the island to let each contry part be recognized in the respective countries + added languages in the name tag of the island.
PierZen (2022-07-01 17:46:06+00:00): Plus I revised geometry for way 1069440504 to correspond with the cliff at the center of the island.
ElliottPlack (2022-07-01 18:42:59+00:00): Hi there again. Sorry about that! I will take it up with the other user. Nice work on the level of detail on this little spec of an island. I wonder if the places where they buried the disputed alcohol/flags can be seen and mapped :D
berndw (2022-06-28 20:42:18+00:00): Hallo

Nimm bitte zur Lageänderung nicht die ESRI-Bilder sondern die von BING, diese sind zwar nicht unbedingt qualitativ besser aber etwas genauer positioniert.

Bernd
Supaplex (2022-06-22 02:14:14+00:00): Hi您好：

您的變更集太大了，社群能難用現有的 QA 工具來檢核，能不能至少拆成7個變更集好方便檢視?
ZinaidaZ (2022-06-29 13:03:40+00:00): Добрый день.
А зачем убрали имена для других языков?
mavl (2022-06-30 11:43:38+00:00): Этот пакет правок отменён.
user4816003805 (2022-06-26 08:01:12+00:00): Hi salgorithm,

Welcome to OSM!
Your edit generally looks good to me.
However, I'm not sure that you're allowed to use information from BuzzBuzzHome for the "building:flats" information, as it goes against their terms of service (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ).
Information from the SF government is probably okay, since their data is often licensed under the PDDL.
You might want to delete the "building:flats" tag unless you surveyed that yourself (or if you can derive it from a permissible source).

Also, just FYI, if you want to make a building perfectly rectangular, you can hit the "Q" key after drawing and selecting it.

Happy editing!
salgorithm (2022-06-26 20:51:43+00:00): Thank you for your help! I deleted the number of units after looking for a usable source.
user4816003805 (2022-06-27 19:27:07+00:00): Looks good! Thanks!
user4816003805 (2022-06-26 07:34:58+00:00): Wow, does Hanaro actually use Vistaserv for their official homepage? Or is this like a fan site?
MxxCon (2022-06-23 02:35:34+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change access tag from "customers" to "unknown"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122687836
Supaplex (2022-06-22 02:12:04+00:00): Hi 您好：

這個變更集太大了，社群很難從 QA 工具檢核繪製狀況，能否至少分成三個變更集?
highflyer74 (2022-06-22 05:27:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you do a lot of edits with "geometries" as the changeset comment all over Germany.

What is your goal concerning the minor geometry shifts and how do you choose the places you edit?

All the best from Bremen!

PS Ich spreche auch deutsch
ivanbranco (2022-08-10 21:05:07+00:00): Hi Alberto, I notice some problems.

You added the same tags to several elements, while those tags should refere to the specific element.

For example you added the same image (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Fachada_de_la_Torre_BNC_El_Rosal.png/330px-Fachada_de_la_Torre_BNC_El_Rosal.png) to 90 elements, while of course that building can correspond to only one of them. You also added "wikipedia=es:Banco Nacional de Crédito" to the same elements, again the wikipedia tag should refere to the specific element, in this case I think brand:wikipedia or operator:wikipedia fits better.

Same story for the youtube, instagram, facebook, linkedin tags.

And also the start_date, I don't think EVERY branch opened in the same day.
ivanbranco (2022-08-11 15:43:26+00:00): Hi, 

since I noticed your still active
and
that you never replied to changeset comments (included comments regarding the same issues I wrote in this one, eg. changeset/101206529):

I deleted the non-specific tags myself.

I kept:
wheelchair=yes and internet_access=no even if I doubt you surveyed every single bank.

And ref:vatin=VEJ309841327+phone:call_center=0500-2635000 even if I have the same doubts.

Good mapping
tastrax (2022-07-06 07:19:44+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MxxCon (2022-06-23 03:50:08+00:00): I don't read German so I can't tell, but is that an accepted and documented tag or just some terminology they are playing around with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122689589
akadouri (2022-06-23 04:20:27+00:00): It's not an accepted tag, it's not even proposed yet. I'm not sure if it's the best way to document curb extensions but I think it would be ok as a marker to remember where they are for now.

I used Chrome's "Translate This Page" feature to read that wikipage.

Talking about it a little over here -https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1655941475239799
Suburbanno (2022-06-22 06:21:48+00:00): Muito bom o comentário da edição Jefferson, é exatamente assim!
Taksine (2024-01-09 02:50:48+00:00): 大佬还在吗？不是这么画的
Leo Slager (2022-06-22 19:17:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
kortgodt (2022-06-25 07:25:21+00:00): Geding skov er udvidet med nyplantning forår 2021 af naturstyrelsen iht mine tidligere bidrag du nu har ændret.
kortgodt (2022-06-25 07:26:21+00:00): Ydermere er jorden ikke udlagt til landbrug men eng hvor der endnu ikke er plantet skov.
kortgodt (2022-06-25 07:29:20+00:00): https://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/309819/hoejskilt-geding.pdf
osmviborg (2022-06-25 09:11:52+00:00): Revertet.
martien-176 (2022-06-23 18:34:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

Thanks for mapping. Next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

And please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

Keep up the mapping - many thanks!

Kind regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122690973
Frans S (2022-09-21 09:55:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, square all rectangular buildings with the Q key when selected. None has been squared properly.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122691990
Frans S (2022-09-21 09:51:04+00:00): Hello
A remark. Please focus on mapping of buildings. Roads are not part of this project. However, when you decide to map roads, please use the correct tag. The road here is at best a track.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122692036
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-22 07:36:26+00:00): شكرا جزيلا لك على مساهماتكم وما تقدمونه
mcliquid (2022-06-26 15:20:32+00:00): Same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072168515
fkv (2022-06-26 15:34:06+00:00): Looks like I need to be more careful. I've upgraded to a new Merkaartor version recently. Maybe it doesn't snap nodes in the same manner as its predecessor. Anyway, I've now corrected the mistake here. Thanks for the info.
mcliquid (2022-06-26 15:36:10+00:00): Was happy to help! Have fun with mapping furthermore.
Langlaeufer (2022-06-22 07:12:56+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur. Kennst du dich dort aus? Wie ist der Weg beschildert? Als Fuß-/Radweg mit landw. Verkehr frei? Wirkt mir etwas unwahrscheinlich.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122692695
Jorisbo (2022-06-23 19:34:22+00:00): Hallo langlauefer! Ich bin nicht bekannt. Ich habe nur den typo geändert. Vielleicht is der erste editor dort bekannt. Grussen Joris
s0mik (2022-07-14 11:24:57+00:00): А на каком основании удалены три объекта, которые были домами под номерами 1,3,5, а ныне являющимися руинами, так-как территорию никто облагораживать не собирается
П3тр0виЧъ (2022-07-14 11:36:54+00:00): Они не удалены, префикс добавлен. Там же руин вроде нет уже, только кучи мусора. Хочешь верну или сам верни, ели они тебе дороги.
П3тр0виЧъ (2022-07-14 11:37:34+00:00): Адреса оставлены, тем более.
literan (2022-06-22 17:38:22+00:00): Продукты это не название, а надпись на вывеске
Akrimullah (2022-06-29 01:49:40+00:00): halo Brayat Mentaok, sepertinya ada kesalah pahaman terkait definisi highway=footway yang anda maksud dalam beberapa perubahan yang anda lakukan disekitar jogja. 
Definisi highway=footway dalam wiki OSM sebagaimana tercantum "The tag highway=footway is used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians." atau dalam bahasa indonesia jalan yang digunakan eksklusif hanya untuk pejalan kaki. Sementara jalan yang anda ubah hampir sebagian besar dapat dilewati oleh motor dan mobil. 
Mohon sekiranya melakukan pengecekan ulang dan menyesuaikannya dengan yang tercantum dalam standar berikut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features. 

Perubahan yang anda lakukan menyebabkan perubahan rute untuk pengguna routing di area jogja. karena footway merupakan jalan minor yang tidak termasuk dalam prioritas routing kendaraan bermotor khususnya. 

salam
Akrimullah (2022-06-29 01:50:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
kortgodt (2022-07-05 17:33:19+00:00): udlagt til eng/overdrev forår 2021 af Naturstyrelsen.
osmviborg (2022-06-23 13:11:25+00:00): Du har brugt et ikke dokumenteret tag 'area:highway=prohibited', det må man gerne; men det smarteste er at bruge dokumenterede tags. Her er en link til lidt læsning om 'tags': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Joto/How_to_invent_tags
Piskvor (2022-06-22 09:50:07+00:00): If it's inaccessible to public, it would be best to tag as access=private - then it's not necessary to specify bicycle accessibility.
Eino81 (2022-06-22 10:16:05+00:00): Corrected
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:29:05+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:22:42+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
elgolfo (2022-06-22 08:33:45+00:00): Name ist wirklich nur der Name, habe es daher nach description verschoben. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
NicoSa (2022-06-22 09:07:45+00:00): Ok, wollte nur klarstellen, dass es sich um ein Privatgrundstück handelt. Betretungsrechte regelt das BGB.
parsd51 (2022-07-26 21:17:25+00:00): Hej Opspin

Jeg har nogle generelle kommentarer til dine changesets. De er ment som en hjælp - også til andre medlæsere.

Jeg kan godt forstå du gerne vil mappe gågader i rette størrelse, det har bare nogle uhensigsmæssigheder:

- OSM er en model af virkeligheden og veje tegnes primært som ways, dvs. en linie.
- Naviagtions apps/systemer bruger, såvidt jeg ved, kun way's til navigation.
- Med både way og area for gågader bliver gadenavne etc. dubleret unødigt og kan skabe forvirring.

Jeg foreslår derfor gågader kun mappes som areas, hvor der er en meget større udstrækning end en way og holde gadenavnet til ways, som er det officielle fra Danmarks Adresseregister og holde navne på pladser til square. Alternativt holde tagningen på ways og kun tagge highway pedestrian, area og noname på det større område.

highway pedestrian forventer et navn på gaden, derfor noname=yes for at undgå warnings i editoren JOSM. I øvrigt en god ide generelt at checke warnings inden upload, det fanger f.eks krydsende veje som skulle være forbundet (dette changeset)

access yes på en highway, betyder alt må køre der fra fodgængere til busser og store vogntog.

access no, er sjældent relevant, og giver anledning til misforståelser (f.eks. tegnes vejen som access no på openstreetmap.org), for highway typen indikerer det allerede. Tvivlstilfælde kan være footway, cycleway, og path, idet f.eks. den primære brug er footway, men det er tilladt at cykle. I de tre tilfælde er kun foot, bicycle, horse relevante, andre trafiktyper har ikke adgang, medmindre det er eksplicit tagget med f.eks. motor_vehicle destination. Andre highway typer tillader bicycle og foot, dog undtagen trunk og motorway.

Generelt vil jeg foreslå at læse wiki dokumentationen for et tag før det bruges og kigge lidt rundt.

Jeg håber det hjælper.

Hilsen
Per
GeorgeKarios (2022-07-02 13:18:42+00:00): Hello mr. Layft, just commenting right here to say to NOT reverse back the Jetties to walking paths as that's not Correct. Thanks for ur time.