piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-10 16:59:25+00:00): Hi venu chowdary, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings, which have been mapped just a few weeks ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60572527
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
szjjdd (2018-07-10 11:08:34+00:00): not Correcting, but "ADDING buildings".
mavl (2018-07-20 13:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
kartonage (2018-07-10 16:31:37+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,

eigentlich war hier alles richtig eingetragen. Es handelt sich bei der Promenade und dem Steg tatsächlich um einen Fußweg mit dem Verkehrszeichen 239 und Zusatzschild 1022-10. Aus diesem Grund ist das auch auf diese Art und Weise eingetragen. Für Radfaher ist das natürlich frei zugänglich und wird auch so von den Routern behandelt. Gibt also keinen Grund das anzupassen (oder?).
Auch das Ändern der Verbindung zur Schöneberger Schleife war gar nicht nötig, da dieser als für Fußgänger und Radfahrer gewidmet eingetragen war.
Ich habe die Änderung aus diesen Gründen wieder zurückgenommen. 
//
Ich würde dir empfehlen dich ein wenig mit den Gegebenheiten in OSM vertraut zu machen. Zum Beispiel über das Tutorial im iD Editor, diesem wunderbaren Tutorial (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf) oder dem Wiki allgemein (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite).

Falls du Fragen hast, dann gern stellen.

Schöne Grüße
Micha S (2018-07-10 16:36:15+00:00): Hallo,
ja, da wirst du Recht haben und ich hätte mich tatsächlich erst mal Näher mit dem ganzen Beschäftigen sollen.

Der Grund für die Änderung war, dass mir eine andere App, die ihre Daten von OSM holt (die App Naviki) diesen Steg nicht als Radweg erkannt hat, was er ja auch nach deinen Ausführungen nicht wirklich ist.

Beim nächsten Mal gucke ich besser nach, wenn ich denke, etwas ändern zu müssen.

Danke für die Info und Sorry für die Umstände. :-)
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
michalfabik (2018-07-10 15:02:50+00:00): Pozdrav,  
zašto si izbrisao sve ovo? Sve sam vratio.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-10 17:00:08+00:00): #vandalism ?
See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60573164
michalfabik (2018-07-10 17:04:53+00:00): I don't think so, more likely an overeager beginner. I reverted this changeset and he immediately started redrawing everything back on top of the reverted data (buildings over buildings, duplicated place=town etc.)  
I sent him a message and will try to keep an eye on him.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-10 17:05:59+00:00): @michalfabik thanks!

And Isido96, Happy Mapping!
bopoh13 (2020-02-18 21:48:13+00:00): Точки дублируют пакет правок osm.org/changeset/53304409
eggie (2018-07-10 12:24:20+00:00): Correct verwijderd. Meestal staat de info op de BAG adresnodes, maar dat is een ontwikkeling die pas later is afgesproken.
FrançoiseR (2018-08-15 14:33:37+00:00): Salut Pada
Il  faut garder une continuité entre les pistes cyclables et les autres voies, même si ça parait un peu artificiel, afin de permettre le routage. Voir le fil de discussion ici: 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2018-August/089646.html
Bien cordialement
Françoise
RicoElectrico (2018-07-10 19:52:41+00:00): Cześć, mam dwie uwagi:

1) Dom który dodałeś nie jest oznaczony jako dom. Teraz to obszar bez oznaczeń. Dom dodaje się tak: rysujesz obszar, w menu po lewej stronie szukasz "budynek" albo "dom", potem klikasz kategorię.

2) Zapomniałeś dodać do niego adresu Wydmowa 22A, o którym piszesz w opisie edycji. To też można zrobić z menu po lewej stronie mając zaznaczony budynek.

3) Według gminnej mapy z e-mapa.net tu powinien być 20A. Która wersja jest prawidłowa?

Z góry dziękuję za odpowiedź. Jeśli potrzebujesz w czymś pomocy, śmiało pisz.
RicoElectrico (2018-07-13 19:03:20+00:00): Poprawiłem budynek. Dałem numer 20A, jeśli jest inaczej to zmień.
viloan (2018-07-10 11:41:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-07-20 17:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
abakus_uploader (2018-07-10 22:35:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mueschel (2018-07-12 09:20:24+00:00): Hi,
I noticed a spelling mistake on these objects: The key is "building", not "biuilding".

Please have a look and fix these 648 objects.

Cheers, Jan
mspray9 (2018-07-12 13:06:43+00:00): Hi Jan, Thanks for flagging this. The typo has been corrected. Cheers!
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Régis Vrignaud (2019-09-23 08:47:26+00:00): Bonjour Sign-aunis, juste pour te dire que un panneaux  stop se place sur la voie,ensuite il faut indiquer le sens (dans le sens de la voie:forward ou dans le sens inverse :Backward),j'ai corrigé celui à la sortie du parking Aldi. Bon tag. A bientôt. Cordialement. Régis Vrignaud
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
ulmtuelp (2018-10-30 08:43:07+00:00): Die Relation wurde von grass auf scrub geändert. Wahrscheinlich ist das Gelände zugewachsen? Da können die inneren als Buschgelände gekennzeichneten Ringe entfernt werden.
Nakaner (2018-07-11 16:05:01+00:00): Hi Pekachu,

you asked for a review.

I did not find anything bad but please upload in smaller chunks. JOSM splitted your changeset already in two parts which is a sign that you are beyond the maxium size of a changeset of 10,000 objects. Medium sized changesets are easier to review.

Please also ensure that you comply with the Imports Guideline and Automated Edits Code of Conduct if you do not trace these buildings manually. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60574372
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-10 17:02:22+00:00): Hi Mirjana96, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped objects? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60574663
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_242798 (2018-11-29 15:18:56+00:00): Osmose: Gap between buildings.
Brugstraat 3, Bodegraven.
Volgens Mapillary (ik veronderstel die witte schoenendoos op het dak) is dit een eerste verdieping van een gebouw. 
Misschien kantoor voor de winkel op de begane grond?
Dus met een zelfstandige functie en dus een eigen BAG-registratie.
Ik loop me al jaren af te vragen hoe dat te mappen.
Jij had daar {no:building=yes} van gemaakt. Maar dat is zowel ongebruikelijk (6x in Nederland, waarvan 4x op jouw naam), 3x in Hamburg (note=abgerissen) en 5x in Parijs (note=demolished building) als redelijk onjuist: een building dat geen building is?
Even terug gekeken hoe Jeroen Muris de Markthal in Rotterdam heeft opgelost.
Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Op basis daarvan:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65010752
https://i.postimg.cc/nct7GH6w/Bodegraven-building-part-level-relation.png
[building:part=yes], [building:levels=2], [building:min_level=1], [relation: type=building]
Ik had zelf eigenlijk ook level=1 verwacht, maar dat lijkt niet nodig te zijn.
Ik ben benieuwd naar jouw mening en morgen kijken of Osmose nog steeds moppert.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
streckenkundler (2018-07-10 12:39:22+00:00): Hei,

ist nur der way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25559468#map=19/51.78383/14.07828 die Baustelle, oder die gesamte Straße?

Erfasse bitte mal den Baustellenbereich der Straße mit highway=construction + construction=residential

vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction

Dann können andere besser nachverfolgen wo solche Baustellen sind... allein ein access=no ist dafür ungünstig.

Danke,

Sven
Schrammi (2018-07-10 12:44:36+00:00): Der Teilabschnitt der nicht mehr passierbar ist, ist markiert und von dem Rest der Straße getrennt worden. Ob dieser Teilabschnitt weiter existieren wird, steht noch nicht fest. Es kann sein, dass es eine neue Zufahrt geben wird.
streckenkundler (2018-07-10 13:33:41+00:00): Ah... Also komplett dicht... Ok... Dann sieht die Sache natürlich anders aus... Ist der Abschnitt komplett gesperrt, also incl. Fußgänger, oder nur für den motorisierten Fahrzeugverkehr?

Vielleicht eine kleine note=* am Objekt zur Erklärung... nicht daß irgend einer kommt und denkt "Äh, was soll dieses access=no?"

Danke.

Sven
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
pbnoxious (2018-07-10 20:48:42+00:00): Da hier "review_requested" angegeben wurde: Zuerst einmal Danke für die eigenständige Änderung, die auch in Ordnung ist. In der Regel versuchen wir aber Objekte weiterzuverwenden um ihre Historie besser und übersichtlicher nachvollziehen zu können. Für das nächste Mal also besser verschieben statt löschen :)
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-10 15:20:05+00:00): Porque você apagou as vias de  estacionamento criadas por outro usuário?
apparecidoo (2018-07-10 20:01:11+00:00): Nesse exato local foi criado um novo prédio da Scania.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-22 01:28:11+00:00): linha duplicada? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606111784/history
Wilmer Osario (2022-10-22 12:44:02+00:00): Sí, es duplicada 😅. En seguida la borraré
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 17:50:00+00:00): ainda duplicada
AgusQui (2018-07-16 03:24:39+00:00): Hola, podrás indicar que colectivo para en Humboldt y Moreno? Así lo agrego.
andrewwiseman (2018-07-10 16:05:18+00:00): Looks great! Thanks for mapping
mavl (2018-07-10 16:57:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Этот пакет правок добавляет сомнительные данные. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
jaap de vries (2018-12-06 08:05:20+00:00): Ik zie dat je de Aldi en Jan Linders hebt toegevoegd. Wist je dat ze al op de kaart stonden? Ik heb deze zelf toen de nieuwbouw af was toegevoegd, zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616038568/history . Ik zal je dubbele weer verwijderen.
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-10 17:04:53+00:00): Hi venu chowdary, and again: 

Why did you remove many buildings which have been mapped just a few weeks ago? Furthermore, please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects! This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60576799
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].