piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
harishpuppala (2019-08-08 12:02:44+00:00): Hi grabsg,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Singapore, I have come across one of your edits for "way 706264583" - Primary_link.

However, basis of your comment I think that this link segment will not restrict traffic flow from Cuppage Road to Killiney Road instead a turn restriction will work here.

Please review and suggest if you think otherwise

Thanks in advance.
user_4493657 (2019-07-22 08:38:12+00:00): Witam. Jeśli chcesz dodać informację na temat nawierzchni drogi proszę wykorzystać pole surface w tym przypadku jest już dodane gravel.
Twoja zmiana została wycofana.
farmal (2019-07-23 04:08:27+00:00): Hi Siobkhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

"way 706275800
way 706275801
way 706275802
way 706275803
way 706275804
way 706275805
way 706275806
way 706275807
way 706275808
way 706275809
way 706275810
way 706275811
way 706275812"

classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Siobkhan (2019-07-23 10:40:48+00:00): Hi, Farmal!
I can not accurately determine the type of data roads, as they on my view do not even have a hard surface. Moreover, the type of "service" is assigned to roads without a through passage.
Maybe I misunderstand this and apologize to me. I am just learning))
Siobkhan (2019-07-23 10:46:52+00:00): I do not mind if you correct the type of road, but I think I drew them well. Moreover, in this area there were no roads at all.
viloan (2019-07-22 05:12:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 18:14:01+00:00): voce criou restriçoes de conversão aqui, mas na verdade o certo era mudar a direção das ruas que estava mao dupla e deixa-las como mao unica.
arivenid (2019-07-23 03:36:52+00:00): "Hi Siobkhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the 

"way 706281177
way 706281178
way 706281180
way 706281181
way 706281182
way 706281183"

classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
Siobkhan (2019-07-23 10:45:57+00:00): Hi, Arivenid!
I can not accurately determine the type of data roads, as they on my view do not even have a hard surface. Moreover, the type of "service" is assigned to roads without a through passage.
Maybe I misunderstand this and apologize to me. I am just learning))
I do not mind if you correct the type of road, but I think I drew them well. Moreover, in this area there were no roads at all.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-23 09:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72548457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 and 3037.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
user_5359 (2019-07-22 08:31:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-11-10 13:05:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 05:40:49+00:00): #test #failed ?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
marczoutendijk (2022-10-22 11:42:42+00:00): Hello matchman.
Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706296141
You are using landuse=motorway
What are you trying to achieve with that choice? It's probably not wrong per se, but its not supported very much either and the wiki doesn't list it as a valid choice.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-19 18:37:56+00:00): After 3 year of silence I changed it to natural=scrub
chnav (2019-07-22 13:05:01+00:00): Пожалуйста используйте функцию персональных заметок в MAPS.ME, а не редактор общемировой карты )))

Удалено.
chnav (2019-07-22 13:07:00+00:00): Ага, это не MAPS.ME... В любом случае название "Работа" является описательным, а не именем собственным.
Dartelo (2019-07-23 05:54:54+00:00): Вы действительно правый, стоило сразу удалить эту метку, изучал функционал всех сервисов картографических вот и сделал халтурно так, извините. ))))
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-23 09:58:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72548457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 and 3037.
user_3022894 (2019-10-06 11:19:56+00:00): Hallo stadt-wuppertal_TR,
könnten Sie unter anderem zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188495780 bzw. zu allen in diesem Changeset bearbeiteten Wegen bitte genauer spezifizieren, inwiefern nur "Kunden" Zugang haben? Der Parkplatz, auf den diese Wege führen, hat nämlich gar kein "access"-Tag, was bedeutet, dass der Parkplatz zunächst mal öffentlich ist. Ich vermute, der Parkplatz ist nur für Anwohner? Das wäre dann so etwas wie access=private. Aber Achtung! Ein "access" beschreibt alle Verkehrstypen, einschließlich Fußgänger. Allermindestens mal der südlichste Zufahrtsweg darf von diesen aber doch sicherlich als eine Art Abkürzung genutzt werden, oder? Also ich meine damit, dass diese dort "ganz normal" hergehen dürfen. Dann müssten wir nämlich auf vehicle=customers/private etc... umsteigen. Also vehicle statt access als Key nehmen. Viele Grüße, Lukas
user_3022894 (2019-11-10 15:55:22+00:00): Ich habe dass access=customers jetzt wieder entfernt, da es nicht passt.
user_5359 (2019-07-22 08:25:00+00:00): Hello! If the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706303660 has the value service than the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706303661 couldn't havethe value residential
vssms (2019-07-24 14:24:13+00:00): Hi user_5359,

Thanks for looking into the changeset, I see that this has been corrected. Will follow the suggestion going forward.

Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
Sachin
opendcc (2019-07-23 10:43:19+00:00): Hallo,

ein kleiner Tipp: wenn man in JOSM nach dem Malen eines Gebäudes auf Q drückt, dann wird das rechtwinklig.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich einfach bei mir oder bei geow.

Servus Wolfgang
user_5359 (2019-07-22 08:20:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site Toursim=caravan_site isn't used for single carvan.
ctine89 (2019-07-22 08:28:07+00:00): Sorry if I labeled it under the wrong feature? I am not sure where to find which one is labeled incorrectly. I am using ID editor and I think I have been labeling it RV park and not caravan site. I thought caravan site was for JOSM.
user_5359 (2019-07-22 08:38:28+00:00): The tag are not "owned" by an editor. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706308865 is for my eyes a place for one caravan.
eggie (2019-07-22 10:03:02+00:00): ... oke... en waar de sloot onder de weg doorloopt middels een duiker map je
waterway=drain (als het een buis is) tunnel=culvert  layer=1
De stroomrichting altijd gemaal.. sommige kaarten laten dat zien. 
Gr eggie
TaraV (2019-07-22 15:03:20+00:00): Correction -  government data used: data.sa.gov.au
eggie (2019-07-22 09:59:30+00:00): Dag Mapper H.. Probeer als het even kan om op de adresnode bij te taggen. Dan is adres verbonden met de naam.
Evt nog phone toevoegen.
Dit zelfde geldt eigenlijk voor alle instellingen, winkels, bedrijven, e.d.
Gr eggie
abakus_uploader (2019-07-22 22:31:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
TaraV (2019-07-22 15:03:05+00:00): Correction -  government data used: data.sa.gov.au
Aleksandar Matejevic (2019-07-22 15:02:00+00:00): Correction -  government data used: data.sa.gov.au
dentonny (2019-07-22 09:31:11+00:00): forgot to add details: added new cycleway
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
ENTUR Fredrik Edler (2019-07-23 06:35:51+00:00): Her er det fremdeles ingen park.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72506487
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
ivanbranco (2022-02-13 09:26:42+00:00): Hi myxor,

what' the meaning of the five place=place tags you added in Berenbrok? Is not a common tag

Maybe they could be changed to the most common place=locality?
myxor (2022-02-13 12:18:07+00:00): Hey icanbranco,
changes done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117351580
thank you.
Omnific (2019-07-22 14:56:36+00:00): Do not add tag spam. This will be reverted.
TaraV (2019-07-22 15:02:54+00:00): Correction -  government data used: data.sa.gov.au
eggie (2019-07-22 10:09:13+00:00): Prima actie... De eenrichtingsuitzondering daar geldt ook voor bromfietsen..
Dus je kunt nog toevoegen
oneway:moped=no

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-22 11:09:11+00:00): Zou je willen uitleggen waar je mee bezig bent, want hier gaat wel erg veel mis. Het is in OSM toch de bedoeling dat de kaart voor routering kan worden gebruikt. Waarom weer zo'n _link Kuipersdijk ?
een fietspad dat de verkeerde kant op  routeert met oneway? Waarom draai je de oneway om?
Wegen die niet verbonden zijn door verbindingsnodes. 
En op geen enkele opmerking een reactie helaas.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-22 11:22:36+00:00): Waar horen hier de fietsers te rijden? 
Is het oostelijke fietspad nu wellicht oneway=no ipv oneway=yes in omgekeerde richting?
eggie (2019-07-22 11:23:22+00:00): Kijk ook eens bij superview https://satellietdataportaal.nl/
voor de laatste ontwikkelingen.
Leo Slager (2019-07-22 11:50:21+00:00): Hij mist nog wat ervaring en kennis van de wiki.
Het project herinrichten Kuipersdijk is in juni 2019 voltooid. Er mist nog een vrijliggend fietspad aan de NW zijde van de weg.
@Eggie, Waar zit die _link  ?
@VRT OSM,  Als je vanuit de veiligheidsregio de kaart up to date gaat houden, lever je een belangrijke bijdrage aan OSM, maar je zult je wel moeten houden aan de internationale afspraken van de OSM community. Die vindt je terug in de wiki. Als er vragen zijn, stel ze gerust, of op het forum, of via een PB aan Eggie of mij.
Leo Slager (2019-07-22 11:51:44+00:00): Ik neem aan dat beide fietspaden zijn ingericht voor eenrichtingsverkeer.
Ik zal dat corrigeren.
Leo Slager (2019-07-22 12:41:12+00:00): Wellicht is het ook een goed idee om de editor Potlatch in te ruilen voor de editor JOSM. Daarmee kun je veel nauwkeuriger werken en de ingebouwde validatie-tool voorkomt vele fouten.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2019-07-22 12:51:39+00:00): Ha Leo... De link zit hier, maar de Kuipersdijk zit ook nog in de knoop daar. Ik had nog niets aangepast. dacht doe het zo wel.
Kijk jij nog even?
Groet, Eggie
eggie (2019-07-22 13:19:34+00:00): Ik he het even zelf uit de knoop gehaald en de secondary_link omgetagd naar unclassified
Leo Slager (2019-07-22 13:28:48+00:00): was ook net bezig om de kuipersdijk node voor node te controleren. En adhv de plannen heb ik het fietspad aan de NWzijde ingetekend.
Controle met BGT omtrekgericht moet nog plaatsvinden.
eggie (2019-07-22 13:29:39+00:00): bicycle =use_sidepath toegevoegd en verbindingsnodes fietspad rijbaan gemaakt.
eggie (2019-07-22 13:31:37+00:00): Oke ... Denk dat de BGT omtrekgericht niet meer uptodate is. satellietdataportaal is nogal bewolkt. Het zal in ieder geval weer routeren zo.
mavl (2019-07-24 16:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
andergrin (2019-07-22 14:15:48+00:00): Ці точки вже є на мапі, відкотив ваші зміни.
viloan (2019-07-22 10:19:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-07-22 10:46:05+00:00): Hi Leszek Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Gr eggie
Leszek Kozłowski (2019-07-22 10:51:20+00:00): Hi
On my maps.me app there wasn't this place
Leszek
eggie (2019-07-22 10:58:40+00:00): No.. that's the problem with maps.me The tagging is add the man_made=bridge  :)
Hard to notice in maps.me
Have a nice day...
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-22 10:54:34+00:00): Hi Schiphol Noord is already present here at a node. public_transport=
I will delete your contribution.
Gr eggie
Leszek Kozłowski (2019-07-22 10:56:37+00:00): Hi 
the same like st the last, on my maps.me apps was only "bus stop"
Leszek
eggie (2019-07-22 11:45:29+00:00): Hi.. maps.me is limited.  For instance.. The Rijksmuseum for instance is mapped  in OSM several times with maps.me Maps.me is not well suited for editing. You have to look afterwards at home with a regular editor as josm or iD.
The is in OSM Netherlands a special group just mapping busstations. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-22 12:06:56+00:00): Beste  VRT..

Dit is je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72508193

Het is geen secondary_link. .. highway=service is beter en dan nog zopnder service=parking_aisle  Dat stukje is geen parkeerplaats.
Die hele Kuipersdijk daar zit in de knoop.
Je "moet"  je edits even checken voordat je opslaat. 
de Kuipersdijk loopt de verbindingsnode voorbij en keer over de zelfde weg weer terug naar de afslag!
aharvey (2019-07-23 04:41:03+00:00): Could you please give a bit more information about what you're changing and where you're sourcing your information from?

It looks like you've converted the proposed rail line here into dual ways (which is good), but a bit more info would be good. Thanks
mavl (2019-07-24 16:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
mavl (2019-07-24 16:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72609993 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3040].
nurdafur (2019-07-22 15:41:42+00:00): Hallo Samden
Du hast an der Hüttenkopfstrssse ein eingezeichnettes Gebäude gelöscht.
Hast du vor Ort überprüft, ob es dies wirklich nicht mehr gibt.
Eventuell sollte es einfach noch eine klarere Definition bekommen.
Liebe Grüsse
Urs
sovereign_ch (2019-07-22 15:46:05+00:00): Hi, das habe ich aufgrund der note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1847475) bereits gefragt. ;-)
LG