piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 14:04:20+00:00): Again:

There is no sign with 100 km/h (sign A1-100) at the start of the sliproad, only a sign start motorway (sign G1). This is what you probably verified.

Your interpretation of these signs is wrong. After sign G1 the speed limit is 130 km/h, see RVV art 21a: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0004825&hoofdstuk=II&paragraaf=8&artikel=21&z=2021-07-01&g=2021-07-01

Only on the main carriageway of the motorway is a sign lowering the speed limit to 100 km/h.

These situations have been discussed extensively. I know it's counterintuitive, but it's the correct interpretation of the traffic signs, verified by Rijkswaterstaat.
user_5359 (2022-04-19 04:28:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice a street, a road, a footway, a path has always the OSM key highway. I have corrected this.

DON'T overpaint existing ways.
mueschel (2022-05-10 13:43:56+00:00): Hi,
what does 'recycling:encombrants' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-18 22:31:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
sanch3z (2022-04-18 19:39:07+00:00): Um Häuser abzuzeichnen würde ich die Bavaria (80 cm) Karte empfehlen. Die Satellitenkarte von Bing ist weder georeferenziert noch orthogonalisiert, was die Darstellung verzerrt.
NPCtom (2022-04-18 14:40:49+00:00): Reason for change?
tbtb (2022-04-19 07:51:53+00:00): New bridge.
southglos (2022-04-22 01:42:36+00:00): Hi.  Has this actually been built?  If not, it should either be highway=construction (if construction is in progress), or highway=proposed (as it was before the edit).

Secondly, even if built, it probably shouldn't be highway=motorway_link unless it's actually under motorway regulations.  highway=tertiary would be more likely.

Also, the name should just be the name - avoid putting descriptions in there.  So no (unfinised [sic] M49 link); feel free to stick that bit in the description or note tag instead.

Cheers
yasslay (2022-05-31 18:38:50+00:00): Hello! I have the same question as southglos above and I intend to revert this changeset if it cannot be verified.

Kind regards,
AOOSMU
yasslay (2022-06-01 21:37:57+00:00): Hi, I am sorry for the short notice however I will be reverting this changeset since it seems erroneous and it has been asked a month prior to this by another user as to whether this can be verified. If this is proven otherwise, please let me know.

Kind regards,
AOOSMU
rarad74 (2022-04-18 17:33:51+00:00): Salut. Mare atentie cu informatiile de pe ANCPI. Din punct de vedere al corectitudinii ceea ce scrie pe panourile stradale cu numele strazii primeaza. ( asta daca ai fost in teren si ai confirmarea vizuala). ANCPI are o gramada de informatii expirate si eronate - in special nume de strazi si numere de adresa. E bine de verificat si din alte surse.
Bachross (2022-04-18 18:13:01+00:00): Salut, am fost in teren si pot sa confirm ca acesta este numele care apare pe panourile stradale.
TheBestIdea (2022-04-18 19:01:33+00:00): Hi Szewah, 

The Columbus Ave protected bike lane was already correctly mapped with the "cycleway:left=track" tag on the main way. This new separate cycleway is duplicative so I'm going to revert it. See generally https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 
You can see bike lanes that are mapped using the cycleway=* tag in the CycleOSM layer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/40.77720/-73.97775&layers=Y
Let me know if you have any questions!

Happy mapping,
Brandon
Szewah (2022-04-18 22:37:27+00:00): Thanks Brandon for the explanation.
MxxCon (2022-04-19 01:10:43+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change an obviously residential road as a foot path?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119863545
strukturart (2022-04-19 06:57:46+00:00): yes you are right the beginning of the path is wrong, i corrected it
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119863545
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 17:27:18+00:00): Please don't move to historic concepts or locations. This is reflecting the existing concept of the area. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 17:41:20+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875635209
BCNorwich (2022-05-05 06:32:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if this feature is verifiable or rather your personal POI? If it is a genuine feature then as tagged it's accessible to others, is this the case? Internet access, really? Tourist feature, really?

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
5m4u9 (2022-04-21 04:48:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por las ediciones. Algunas no tan buenas.

Tengo dudas de que cada edificio se llama Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas o Ingeniería de Alimentos. Me acuerdo haber puesto los nombres que aquella vez vi.

Voy a simplificar el nodo de las facultades para dejar libre los nombres de los edificios.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
vojtechzaboril (2022-10-18 17:44:17+00:00): Dobrý den,
nemapujte prosím více pruhů silnice vedle sebe jako několik cest s highway=*. Použijte tagy jako lanes=*, turn:lanes=*, placement=* atd.
vojtechzaboril (2022-10-18 17:44:44+00:00): Jinak používání map.cz není v souladu s licenčními podmínkami.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 16:59:44+00:00): This is actually correct. There will be a triangular protrusion into water. 
Recently there was a complaint about a organized editing team shrinking buildings constructed over water to within land wrongly in an international community, so I hope everyone can  be more cautious before doing so.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 17:01:02+00:00): Although this part here might be for the bridge.
mirikaaa (2022-04-27 13:02:13+00:00): Hi, Kovoschiz! Thank you for writing about this issue and also for fixing this case. In the future, we will be more attentive to such edits and expand our knowledge of mapping. Best Regards,Mapbox.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119865673
HKHikerhang (2022-04-18 16:41:17+00:00): The peak should not be deleted as this actually a high point. We can leave the historical name using the tag "old_name" so that the name will not be shown
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-23 03:56:01+00:00): Why were the buildings deleted?
Udarian (2022-04-18 15:54:29+00:00): forgot to mention in the main commit, I separated a dual carriageway road
Daniela Gurs (2022-04-20 15:54:58+00:00): How can i accept this change?
Frans S (2022-04-25 15:18:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119866208
Frans S (2022-04-19 10:30:39+00:00): This is again one of the wrong mapped tasks.
Please map the buildings as rectangular buildings and square them with the Q key.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119866269
BubbaJuice (2022-04-24 04:33:15+00:00): Hey karsonkevin2,

In what way is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052733252 a nature reserve?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
karson_ (2022-04-24 13:21:29+00:00): The parcel is owned by the town of Marana as a water easement.
eggie (2022-05-05 17:33:26+00:00): Wouter,
Bij een NL:C gebruik je deze tagging way 	vehicle=no & horse=no & traffic_sign=NL:C1

Kijk steeds in de wiki hoe te taggen.
Wat leesvoer welke tags bij welke borden horen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

MVG
eggie
Xyberion (2022-05-08 21:59:20+00:00): Beste eggie,

Mijn fout. Ik had het opgevat als dat de "traffic sign" tag de andere tags (zoals vehicle=no) impliceert en dat dus enkel de traffic sign tag voldoende was. In het vervolg zal ik de access tags laten staan!

Groet,
Wouter
eggie (2022-05-08 22:12:52+00:00): Wouter.. Je zou even bovenstaande tags kunnen toevoegen die bij dat C1 bord horen.
vehicle=no
horse=no

Dan staat het dus nog wel open voor wandelaars, maar die mogen een C1 bord negeren. 
Voeg je het zelf toe?

Groet
eggie
Xyberion (2022-05-10 19:09:15+00:00): Yes, ze zijn toegevoegd!

Groet
Wouter
eggie (2022-05-10 19:36:07+00:00): Wouter.. Bijna goed.. :)

Het moet zijn
vehicle=no
horse=no

Dus alles met wielen..

Groet
eggie
Xyberion (2022-05-12 22:20:06+00:00): Haha, een ezel stoot zich geen twee keer tegen dezelfde steen...

Het is nu echt goed getagd! Beloofd! :p
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 16:54:04+00:00): If the name is wrong, remove the name only. Don't delete it. It still represents something in reality.
Frans S (2022-04-19 08:26:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You mapped buildings through existing paths. Please don't. Just move the path aside of the building you want to map.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119867128
fabiotofy (2022-04-18 18:29:12+00:00): ma le due singole aree create come "WAY" non andrebbero etichettato con un apposito tag ? Roccia, massi, rupe, costa, ecc... le lasciamo così come due semplici "line" senza null'altro specificato ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119867311
PT-53 (2023-03-20 07:25:31+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,
in keep right werden in dieser "Golf-Anlage" mehrere Hinweise angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.95941&lon=9.654&zoom=19&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C20

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Soweit das keine Fehler sind, könntest Du die Hinweise ja auf "ignorieren (kein Fehler)" setzen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-30 06:18:57+00:00): Hallo Mammi71, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Mammi71 (2023-04-03 19:41:37+00:00): Kann alles ignoriert werden.
PT-53 (2023-04-04 05:40:40+00:00): Ich würde es begrüßen, wenn Du das auf Ignorieren setzen würdest.
Mammi71 (2023-04-05 16:36:07+00:00): Schon längst erledigt.
Emilius123 (2022-04-18 21:54:32+00:00): Please avoide these kind of big changeset bboxes.
algastroller (2022-04-24 09:41:02+00:00): Hi Emilius. Thanks for the comment. I actually have no ideas about the changeset bboxes because I am not familiar with the technical end of maps.me. They seem to create problems ? If you can tell me how I can make change better next time, I can follow the instructions.
Emilius123 (2022-04-24 22:44:37+00:00): Hi,

The concept is quite simple: Whenever you upload your stored changes from not just maps.me but any editor, a changeset is created, which stores the changes you've made to the map.

That changeset has a "bounding box". An automatically calculated square, whose perimeter always includes your changes. So if you upload a single changeset changing things wildly far away, that will result in a big bounding box (bbox).

The reason people complain about these is that anyone checking the "History" tab on the OpenStreetMap main page whose view is within a changeset's bbox, the changeset will be shown, even if no changes from the set are nearby.

Don't worry though, there is no harm done or anything, it's just good manners.

The simplest solution to this is just uploading to OSM from your editor every time you change the locations of your edits.



Have fun mapping!
-Emil
limes11 (2022-04-19 22:03:56+00:00): Hallo, 

kannst du nochmal auf 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172413060

schauen?

Den Stummel wird es in der Form nicht geben. 

Viele Grüße, Limes
Jerry_W2k (2022-11-29 19:37:46+00:00): To były cmentarz, teraz jest to park. Nie ma tu żadnego nagrobku, tylko tabliczka upamiętniająca pochodzenie miejsca
NorthCrab (2022-11-29 19:56:47+00:00): ^ Translation:
Это бывшее кладбище, теперь здесь парк. Здесь нет надгробия, только мемориальная доска в память о возникновении этого места
conradoos (2022-05-30 13:50:38+00:00): Zmiany, które wprowadzasz nie mają sensu (chodzi o dobór tagów). Więc odpowiadaj proszę na komentarze do zestawów zmian.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 23:43:00+00:00): Agrega un nombre a la ubicación.
user_1566574 (2022-04-21 19:41:34+00:00): Aïe...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91110451
eggie (2022-04-18 18:34:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Is dit een kampeerplek?
Waar is de camping?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-18 18:37:27+00:00): You are sure...  This is in the middle of a forest?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-04-18 18:39:31+00:00): Beste Hans.. Dit lijkt me zeer ongeloofwaardig.

Ligt hier materiaal om je fiets te repareren?

Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-18 18:40:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station
?
Tjuro_Global (2022-04-18 17:11:36+00:00): hello cytryn,

I see that you have added a couple, natural=shrubbery features.  however the added features are lines, instead of areas. According to the wiki natural=shrubbery should not be used on a line. could you retag thees features or make them into an area?

regards
cytryn (2022-04-18 18:26:48+00:00): Hi,
You are of course right, but the case is not so obvious ;) because these are actually shrubs planted in a row, so such a way of mapping them seems to be more accurate than mapped as areas (something like natural=tree_row). On the other hand these shrubs do not form hedge, so barrier=hedge (which can, and even should be a linear object) also doesn't fit here. Probably the best solutuon would be mapping every single object as natural=shrub :)
Martin Ldt (2022-06-21 18:14:40+00:00): is this road still under construction?
pianolente (2022-06-22 11:18:39+00:00): Probably not, I don't know; this Saturday, however, I will go to check.
pianolente (2022-06-25 22:14:36+00:00): the roads are still under construction; the works in the whole area are not finished yet, there have been some updates that I have included
Martin Ldt (2022-06-26 06:21:26+00:00): Thank you, 
I'm an osm contributor planning a trip from Belgium to Milan by bike, hence my question !
pianolente (2022-06-26 14:47:28+00:00): today it was still closed; I also do not think that it is possible to cross the tunnel under the railway in the wrong direction, not even with bicycles
aceman444 (2022-11-13 09:47:10+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za zjednocovanie pozemkov okolo kostolov. Vyzera to byt dobre podla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious .
Len teda pozor na to, ze kostoly zamerne nemali v nazve slovo "kostol" ci "kaplnka" (je to koncepcia dohodnuta v minulosti, neviem nakolko je na nej stale zhoda).
A napr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052742356 ste zabudli presunut opravnenia pristupu (foot=permissive) a povrch z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170046200 .
Illio (2022-11-13 10:59:34+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie. Osobne nesúhlasím s tým, že sa neuvádza slovo "kostol" alebo "kaplnka", pretože to slovo je regulérna súčasť názvu. Pozrite sa do Česka, Poľska, Maďarska, Slovinska a pod. a všade uvádzajú pri názvoch kostolov aj slovo kostol.
Frans S (2022-04-19 10:28:14+00:00): Hello. 
An urgent request. Please stop mapping rectangular buildings as round buildings. 
Sometimes it is difficult to see, but most of the times it is clear that the buildings are rectangular.
It cost a lot of time to adjust your mappings every time.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119868456
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-27 23:11:39+00:00): Hi, you mapped a bunch of objects that are tagged as nature reserves, can you clarify what these are?
karson_ (2022-04-27 23:57:45+00:00): Hi Brian,

I'm not sure what explaining there is to do here? They are parcels protected from development which haven't had any improvements to make them qualify as leisure=park. If I recall, I think some were administered by the HOA of the neighborhood, some by the city, and some by the county.

This was my first attempt at trying to figure out how to deal with an HOA. If I were to remap it, I might do it a bit differently since I dissolved adjacent nature reserve parcels with different owners (would keep them separate if redoing).

I am assuming this was a good-faith comment on your part, that the changeset was flagged in review software, and that you were not canvassed. Perhaps it is coincidence that another editor found fault with one of my changesets in this same neighborhood. 

-Karson
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-28 02:11:30+00:00): There is a very active chat community and mappers talk to each other :)  I would invite you to join Slack (slack.openstreetmap.us) or Discord (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap) for a more interactive experience.
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-28 02:14:06+00:00): In general it's not typical practice to tag conservation easements (which is what it sounds like these are) as nature reserves, and there has been debate on whether these are even objects that should be mapped.  The closest tagging that would probably make sense is landuse=conservation, and even that is probably controversial.
Glassman (2022-04-28 20:20:56+00:00): @karsonkevin2 Can I suggest retagging these as what is on the ground. Such as natural=wood, or landuse=grass, etc. Since the HOA has control over these they could change over time, unlike a nature_reserve which is usually restricted by law. Plus using those tags they render nicely.
BubbaJuice (2022-04-28 22:52:29+00:00): I'm retagging the neighborhood right now I would prefer no conflicts.
karson_ (2022-04-30 12:49:36+00:00): I am already in the Slack and Discord. I just found it weird that people were piling onto a regular olde changeset without saying how they got here.

In regard to my changes in this particular area, I would still contend they are correct, but I will leave it alone for the time being. Being separate parcels reserved from development sounds like a stereotypical leisure=nature_reserve to me.
jmarchon (2022-04-18 17:09:00+00:00): My 1500th changeset!