piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
boneco (2015-07-22 12:50:24+00:00): a tag wikipedia=en:Rio Água Suja está quebrada, não seria pt:Rio Água Suja   ??
boneco (2015-07-22 12:51:00+00:00): o JOSM tem um validador que ajuda a encontrar alguns erros e maximizar as edições.
Stalfur (2015-08-20 19:42:57+00:00): Fantastic addition for me!
rickmastfan67 (2015-07-22 03:30:28+00:00): Everything looks ok to me. ;)
GeoKitten (2015-08-17 21:01:41+00:00): Well, thanks.
ChristopherMGRF (2015-07-22 02:52:37+00:00): Saya kira ini sudah minggu keempat, saya ingin ini di  masukan ke minggu ke empat bukan minggu bonus, karena saya berpikir mulai tanggal 25 ya berakhir tanggal 25 kan katanya kompetisinya 1 bulan. karena tidak ada pemberitahuan, saya anggap ini minggu ke 4.. harapannya objek yang ini di masukan ke hitungan minggu ke empat, minggu bonus nya di kosongkan saja. terima kasih..
GerdP (2015-11-11 16:08:34+00:00): please review:
oneway=yes; no
makes no sense
maxspeed=RO:urban; 50
better use only 
maxspeed=RO:urban
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24995306
I  guess you have merged two ways with these different attributes without 
adjusting the values?
Supaplex (2015-07-22 04:05:10+00:00): http://www.sanchong.ris.ntpc.gov.tw/web/AB?command=showDetail&postId=321307
附檔有國道路的分段可以參考
luschi (2015-08-09 16:28:03+00:00): bei den gefällten Bäumen als Sperre würde ich eher "barrier=log" verwenden und den "name=gefällte Bäume..." als "note=..." eintragen und vllt noch "access=no" wenn es wirklich permanent ist. 
Ansonsten würde ich ganz auf "barrier=..." usw. verzichten.
Heinz_V (2015-08-03 04:59:53+00:00): You are sure the Balkot-Khariyang-Ridi is a secondary road??
The ref-tag is not correct.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-22 11:49:24+00:00): In the change to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2668464164/history , when you say "hand edit" do you mean that you went there and surveyed it?  If not, upon what basis did you make the change?
Peda (2015-07-22 15:41:12+00:00): Hi Dr Kludge, have you surveyed that change? I'm not sure it actually does make sense as storey is the overall number of levels where as building:levels is the number of levels overground. Could you please clarify?
Tordanik (2015-07-22 16:55:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for still working on the taginfo challenge! However, in the case of the vending machine, it's unlikely that the intended meaning was "number of levels of this building" (i.e. building:levels). Instead, it was probably meant as "level this object is on" (i.e. level).
Heinz_V (2015-08-03 04:57:39+00:00): You are sure the Malakheti-Bandrekhal Road is a secondary road??
The ref-tag is not correct.
Supaplex (2015-10-19 07:00:38+00:00): 感覺怪怪的，對照空照圖，許多建築該標成土地利用比較合理
A-KAI (2015-10-19 08:01:30+00:00): 感謝您的回應！
我會再確認看看。
marc__marc (2020-11-14 14:48:06+00:00): Hello,
what's the meaning of those undocumented tags :
access_status=fair_weather : did you mean (with a sign) access:conditional=no @ wet ? or (without a signa) operational_status=no @ wet
class=B : meaning ? class was depreciated in 2006 in favor of highway=*
condition=poor : did you mean smoothness ?
lanes=Intermediate : did you mean lanes=1.5 ?
resurfaced:date -> paved:date
start_chainage : meaning ?
survey:date should be in iso format YYYY-MM-DD
survey in year 2072 really ?
width:ROW : meaning ?
width:carriage -> width:lanes
project:url -> url as changeset tag
surveyor:name -> drop on object, may be put as changeset tag
Regards,
Marc
d1g (2015-07-22 05:41:31+00:00): ответил про теги: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=518012#p518012
seichter (2015-07-28 12:58:02+00:00): Change set introduces a number of new key values and violates some OSM rules e.g. lanes value must be an integer.
Please change project prerequisites in coordination with ILO and KLL.
rickmastfan67 (2015-10-13 05:18:42+00:00): abbafei, I'm curious as to why you marked this section as closed too?  As far as I can tell, this part is still open for the jughandle movement from US-22.  Plus, in Bing Imagery, you can see the 'road closed' barrier on the other segment blocking it off, but not blocking off this one. Plus, I seem to recall this being open when I went past it along US-22 at the beginning of August '15, but it was night time, so I can't be 100% sure.  But I don't seem to remember any 'ROAD CLOSED' blockades at the traffic lights, or the lights being turned off as I think they would need PennDOT's permission for that part.
abbafei (2015-10-15 05:37:20+00:00): I don't remember; I must have saw it, and just remebered when mapping it a little while afterwards that it was closed off; I did not map this from photographs, but from memory and articles like http://triblive.com/neighborhoods/yourmurrysville/yourmurrysvillemore/3953202-74/road-branthoover-close for example. So it is can be that this part is open, as far as I know.
rickmastfan67 (2015-10-17 11:09:46+00:00): Well, I would think it would be open because they still need to have access to the bank (mentioned in article) there. Plus, there's this tweet (from 2013) saying that the jughandle part will stay open. https://twitter.com/murrysvillepd/status/332443266219921409
Heinz_V (2015-08-03 04:56:05+00:00): You are sure the Rajapur Ring Road is a secondary road.
The ref-tag is not correct.
friedl (2015-07-22 09:44:59+00:00): Hallo,
Ursache für "abbigen nach links nicht möglich" war eingentlich eine Abbiegebeschränkung (wurde durch diesen Änderungssatz jetzt ungültig/fehlerhaft und somit unwirksam).Ich habe diese jetzt entfernt.
saceden (2015-07-22 11:54:47+00:00): darf man jetzt von der promenade richtung lughofer kreisverkehr abbiegen? Soll ja ab Mittwoch (heute) der Einbahnring in Ried aufgehoben werden
friedl (2015-07-22 15:35:51+00:00): Ob man in echt nach links abbiegen darf weiß icht nicht. In OpenStreetmap darf man derzeit nach links abbiegen. Dies ist seit diesem Changeset möglich, da in diesem der die Abbiegebeschränkung beschädgt wurde. Ich habe diese dann in der Annahme, das Abbiegen erlaubt ist komplett gelöscht. Sollte in echt das Abbiegen verboten sein, kann ich ohne weiteres wieder eine Abbiegebeschränkung hinzufügen.
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:58:58+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361665576
has no tags. What is it?
flohoff (2015-07-22 16:29:41+00:00): Hi,
bist du dir mit dem bridleway sicher ? Ich habe in Deutschland noch keinen wirklich gesehen. Das ist ein Konstrukt was ja eher aus England stammt. D.h. in Deutschland sollte da zeichen 238 + entsprechende Schilder stehen das Fußgänger/Radfahrer erlaubt sind.

Flo
PS: Du hast leider keinen changeset kommentar gesetzt
PastorJ (2015-07-22 08:10:16+00:00): This National Boundary between Rwanda and Tanzania is my best guess. Someone may have a more accurate map to base it on, but this is very close to the actual boundary line.
Nakaner (2015-08-02 14:09:15+00:00): Bitte beachte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
ma-rt-in (2020-04-29 11:10:19+00:00): Hallo,
ist die Sendeanlage überhaupt noch aktiv?
Nakaner (2020-04-30 06:31:37+00:00): Hallo,

auf dem Gelände der Sendeanlage war doch, bis vor einigen Monaten die Polizei das Ding durchsucht hat, ein Darknet-Rechenzentrum? Siehe z.B. https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/darknet-rechenzentrum-ermittler-beschlagnahmen-hunderte-server-a-1289056.html

Viele Grüße

Michael
ma-rt-in (2020-04-30 13:09:28+00:00): Ja da war ja was, aber es ging mir darum, ob die Sendeanlage ansich überhaupt noch genutzt wird.
Loneship (2020-05-01 14:48:08+00:00): Hallo,

die Sendeanlage wurde nach der Übernahme der Liegenschaft vor einigen Jahren durch den nun angeklagten Betreiber nur sporadisch durch Funkamateure genutzt. Die Antennen dürften aber noch stehen, die Bezeichnung der Fläche ist aber hinfällig.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-01 15:35:49+00:00): Danke für die Info. Bzgl. der Funkamateure frag ich mal die ansässigen Kontakt nach Info´s.
Supaplex (2015-07-22 17:13:55+00:00): 把校舍也順道畫完吧 :)
Hjart (2015-07-22 17:16:10+00:00): Please note that there are special rules for mapping coastlines and that we had to fix Skärviksklippet because of an error you made. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline
servergate (2015-07-22 11:16:35+00:00): like
Weide (2015-07-23 11:12:42+00:00): public_transport:version=1 - Routen kennen nur Nodes als Haltestellen und diese haben die Rolle "stop" oder (veraltet) "". Die Rolle "platform" und linien- oder flächenförmige Steige gibt es da nicht.
trigpoint (2015-07-22 17:01:00+00:00): What is the source of this name, is it a real peak. Carreg Y Saeth looks to be to the South East, but I am not sure what it is referring to.
Simply copying peaks from old maps adds nothing to openstreetmap, there are lots of things that do need mapping that does not involve an armchair. How up to date are the shops in your local High Street?
trigpoint (2015-07-22 17:03:31+00:00): The correct way to tag multilingual names is to use name:en and name:cy.
In Wales I would go with name=Craig Yr Aderyn, name:en=Birds Rock.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-09 21:59:53+00:00): I've edited this - see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3295022898 .
Ogmios (2015-07-30 14:38:58+00:00): fleißig ;-)
naoliv (2015-07-23 04:28:26+00:00): Tauranis, de onde você copiou os nomes das ruas?
naoliv (2015-07-23 04:34:05+00:00): Tauranis, não é querendo acusar, mas os nomes batem com os do Google. Você usou o mapa do Google?
Tauranis (2015-07-23 11:14:12+00:00): Usei o maps do Google e um mapa impresso.
Há algum problema em usar o maps?
Tauranis (2015-07-23 11:15:18+00:00): Sei que o maps não possui precisão em relação a lugares, portanto só nomeei os lugares que conheço.
Tauranis (2015-07-23 11:17:06+00:00): O mapa impresso é meio velho, então usei o maps para os bairros mais novos
Tauranis (2015-07-23 11:22:17+00:00): se for errado usar o maps, eu excluo as modificações sem problemas, apesar de achar meio ridículo, são só nome de ruas.
Tauranis (2015-07-23 11:29:36+00:00): De qualquer forma alego que estou seguindo a política de Fair Use. Desculpa-me se pareci meio rude, mas acredito ter feito apenas o bem ao mapear as ruas da cidade ontem vivi por 18 anos.

Att

Tauranis
naoliv (2015-07-23 13:13:57+00:00): A questão não é fair use, mas sim permissão de uso, licença, direitos autorais, etc.
Se for você ler https://www.google.com/intl/en_br/help/terms_maps.html verá que não existe possibilidade de gerar trabalhos derivados do Google. O mesmo caso se aplica a outros provedores de mapa (Here, Bing, etc) e aos mapas impressos.
É interessante ler http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs também.
O único mapa, a princípio, do qual temos permissão para copiar os dados é o disponibilizado pelo IBGE. Dá para você utilizá-lo como imagem de fundo através do ícone de camadas no editor que você utiliza.
Infelizmente os nomes precisarão ser removidos daqui (não é apenas selecionar os objetos e apagar os nomes, mas removidos do banco de dados).
Você pode continuar a inserir nomes de ruas ou fazer outras edições sem problema algum, desde que utilize dados que permitam isso.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-03-14 09:44:04+00:00): This changeset tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361728246 as "landuse=quy"... I corrected it to "landuse=quarry" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37816282
user_16881 (2016-03-14 18:13:05+00:00): Merci !
Totor (2015-07-23 04:13:19+00:00): Hi Tinicab,
I saw you edited several times this poi, probably because it does not show up on the map...
You could try:
amenity=post_office and brand=2GO Express.
You can find the description of the tag here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
Cheers,

Totor
Totor (2015-07-23 04:18:19+00:00): Oops, it should be :
amenity=post_office
operator=2GO Express
name=2GO Express
tinicab (2015-07-23 05:19:11+00:00): Hi Totor, thank you, but really, i'm noosebleeding on how to tag the name 2Go Express and FedEx on this particular "point"..right now still figuring out how to apply your recommendation...hehe
GOwin (2015-07-26 11:11:50+00:00): amenity=post_office
brand=2GO Express;FedEx
operator=*

where operator is the name of the establishment as seen in their DTI registration. Usually, these are franchised operators of the brand.

The name tag is optional, or it could be the business style of the operator.
JG° (2015-07-22 13:33:54+00:00): Removal of bus stop "Landes".
No more existing.
Heinz_V (2015-08-03 04:47:01+00:00): You are sure that this is a secondary road???
The ref-tag is not correct.
The roads is mapped twice (track and secondary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pralmty (2015-08-03 05:01:41+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
It will be corrected soon.
wambacher (2015-07-23 20:01:26+00:00): Hi Petros,

what are that nodes for? never ever are that schools!!!
The Locksmith (2015-07-24 06:33:41+00:00): this is geodatas's coordinates, i'm trying to fix them right now
SomeoneElse (2015-07-24 08:38:01+00:00): Are the strange tags in here related to the import that you mention in your post to the imports list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2015-July/003980.html (which unfortunately was sent in a format that the list didn't archive)?
tabris (2015-07-22 17:55:35+00:00): Hallo Hiddenhausener,
erstmal danke, dass du das mit dem Schmalstieg 21 klären konntest. Hatte schon lange vor da mal vorbei zu schauen, bin aber nie zu gekommen.
Zu dem Pfad bis zum Mergelweg: Hast du den tatsächlich in der Realität gesehen oder nur im NRW-Atlas?
Ich bin vor 1-2 Monaten den Mergelweg hoch gegangen und da habe ich ihn nicht finden können. Allerdings bin ich ihn nicht bis zum Ende gegangen, da dort zwei überzeugende Schilder standen: "Privatweg" und "Warnung vor dem Hund".
Die Stelle wo der Schmalstieg auf den Mergelweg trifft hätte ich von da aber sehen müssen.
Falls du den da nicht tatsächlich gesehen hast, dann sollte der da besser wieder weg.
Der klebt übrigens im Moment an der Grenze und nicht am Mergelweg. ;)

Falls du den wieder entfernen solltest: Es wäre ggf. eine Überlegung wert den Weg beizubehalten nur die Tags in den no:-Namespace ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prefix:no ) zu schieben und einen note-Tag dran zu pappen. Du bist nicht der erste der den aus dem NRW-Atlas übernommen hat.

Gruß,
Andreas
Hiddenhausener (2015-07-22 18:19:03+00:00): Hallo Andreas!
Ich bin nur bis "Oben im Feld" gefahren. 
Habe den Weg nicht live gesehen.
Ich hatte die Luftbilder im Alkis/NRW Atlas angesehen und war der Meinung einen Feldweg zu sehen.
Ich habe den Weg jetzt an den Mergelweg geklebt.
Die Verbindung mit der Grenze lag daran, dass ich es mit JOSM gemacht habe. Den benutze ich noch nicht so lange und die Übersichtlichkeit der verschiedenen Linien ist für mich noch nicht so gut.
Das mit dem no verstehe ich leider nicht aber wenn Du willst, kannst Du es ja machen.
Gruß, Gerald
tabris (2015-07-22 20:36:15+00:00): Hallo Gerald,
wenn das Wetter das nächste mal mitspielt versuch ich mal endgültig zu klären ob da ein Weg ist oder nicht. :D
Das mit dem no: hätte zur folge, dass jemand der den Weg einzeichnen will den Linienzug da vorfindet auf dem explizit getaggt ist, dass da kein Weg ist und das in dem note-Tag auch erklärt wird. Zu zumindest die Hoffnung. Aber vorher sollten wir klären, ob da jetzt ein Weg ist oder nicht.
Gruß,
Andreas
Hiddenhausener (2015-07-22 21:03:39+00:00): Was das "no" bewirken soll hatte ich verstanden, das wie ist das Problem.Ich bin aus der Wikiseite nicht schlau geworden. Die ist ja auch nur in Englisch und es gibt kein konkretes tagging Beispiel.
Gruß, Gerald
tabris (2015-07-24 18:36:17+00:00): Hallo Gerald,
also da ist wirklich ein Trampelpfad. Ich stand neben dem Schmalstieg 21 und hätte ihn fast übersehen. Als ich auf dem Mergelweg war, hab ich mich umgedreht und konnte ihn gerade so ausmachen... faszinierend.
Du warst nicht zufällig auch da? Da stand ein Auto mit Calvin&Hobbes-Aufkleber am Anfang von "Oben im Felde". :o)
Zur no-Sache: Aus highway=track wäre dann no:highway=track geworden etc. Es gehört zu den Lifecycle prefixen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Hat sich aber jetzt erledigt.
Gruß,
Andreas
Hiddenhausener (2015-07-24 18:46:23+00:00): Gut das sich das geklärt hat.
Im Luftbild war der Weg auch sehr schwach. Ich hätte nicht darauf geschworen.
Ich war aber nicht mehr da. Mein Auto hat keine Aufkleber. :)
Gruß, Gerald
Jojo4u (2015-10-03 16:56:24+00:00): Halll DIma Lejb Ve,

ein foot=private, bicycle=yes heißt dass Radfahrer fahren dürfen, aber Fußgänger nur mit Erlaubnis. Das kann so nicht stimmen. Was war gemeint?

LG Joachim
*Martin* (2015-07-26 06:59:55+00:00): Ahoj Pajdo

Prosím pridávaj ku svojim zmenám (changesetom) popis. Ďakujem.
Pajdo (2015-07-26 09:11:52+00:00): Ahoj, 
OK, nie je problém.
Prosím, kde sa ten popis použije?
*Martin* (2015-07-26 09:24:00+00:00): V zozname zmien, v tvojom prípade tu: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pajdo/history

Popis je vhodné uvádzať aby iní maperi vedeli čo je jeho obsahom a nemuseli ho pracne analyzovať. Tiež je vhodné zadávať aj zdroj zmien (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source).

Vďaka.

PS: v prípade akýchkoľvek otázok k OSM môžeš písať do slovenského fóra na https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/osm_sk
Pajdo (2015-07-26 09:27:59+00:00): OK. Zatiaľ sa nepúšťam do nejakých hlbokých editácii (to radšej Waze). Tu len zakresľujem cyklotrasy, ktoré som osobne prešiel.
*Martin* (2015-07-26 09:34:30+00:00): Ďakujem. Všetky úpravy smerujúce k skvalitneniu OSM máp si ceníme :-). Jedna z výhod oproti Waze je tá, že úpravy vykonané mappermi patria im a nie komerčnej spoločnosti (Google).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072639 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Adam_Piszczek (2015-07-22 16:05:01+00:00): wystarczy tag higway footway,a jak kapliczka to nie dodaje się "kapliczka"bo tu wpisuje się tylko gdy ona ma nazwe,a kapliczka ma swój tag
Stereo (2015-07-22 16:13:40+00:00): Thanks!
Stereo (2015-07-23 14:06:31+00:00): Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge in Luxembourg!
GerdP (2015-11-11 06:37:39+00:00): please review:
I've changed 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361744921
from highway=residential_link to tertiary_link as it connects a tertiary road with a residential.
I am not sure why 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361745007 (Tenner Road)
is tagged as residential while the 
longer part of Tenner Road is tertiary?
Neither Tenner Road nor Ninninup Road
have a ref=* tag.
I am not a local, maybe you know these details?
dolphinling (2015-07-23 05:54:53+00:00): I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32817100 . Reasoning is discussed there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:29:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072630 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
zimba (2015-07-23 09:02:32+00:00): "Humpenhof" hat fuer ein paar meter "Schaefflershof" ueberlappt, habe ich entfernt. lg
Rui Oliveira (2015-07-22 18:31:28+00:00): a Ligação da avenida da républica e da alameda dos bombeiros voluntários que se cruzam na ligação à rotunda, devem ter 1 ponto em comum. Todas as estradas que se intersectam ao mesmo nivel tem que criar um ponto de intersecção onde se ligam. As únicas excepções são os caso de uma via que se cruza com uma ponte, ou um tunel que se cruza com uma via superior
lezurdis (2015-07-22 18:34:42+00:00): A ligação chegando a rotunda está errado, com as tuas edições é impossível virar para direita de :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173370781
para : http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169205373
lezurdis (2015-07-28 14:56:15+00:00): Já passou 6 dias e o problema de ligação está na mesma, deixando tempo suficiente para que os motores de routing estejam "em dia" :

- http://osrm.at/dTC
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072629 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:28:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072627 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072625 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Skippern (2015-07-23 13:24:04+00:00): O nome do "Rua Manuel A. T. Uso" tem cheiro do easter egg. Existe algum fontes que podemos confiar que confirma esse nome?
Tauranis (2015-07-23 14:04:23+00:00): IBGE - Mapas de setores urbanos
Skippern (2015-07-22 19:35:15+00:00): Luan, bem vindo ao OSM

To observando voce adicionando muitos detalhas no Venda Nova, bom ter algum com conhecimento local para ajudar, um bom parte dos detalhas anterior fui feita por mim e 2 outros usuários, meu conhecimento somente por passa no BR-262 e do Festa do Polenta.
To vendo voce voce dar 2 tipos do erro, não muito greve, mas so quer avisar voce. O etiqueta amenity=public_building e considerado ambíguo, e deve ser evitado, tenta um valor mais especifico. E voce coloquando o etiquete building=* no nodes, esse etiqueta e para poligono do edificio e nao para nodes.
Se ha duvidas so entra em contato e ajudo como poder.
Grato.
streinger (2015-07-22 19:21:40+00:00): точно 118? при въезде между данным зданием и 118А справа на углу этого здания всегда была табличка  Победы 116/5
а 118 это Завод бурового оборудования(http://zbo.ru/)
Minofield (2015-07-24 08:52:08+00:00): На углу этого дома висит табличка 118. Не знаю что за фигня, но на карте так и отметил.
sdoerr (2015-07-22 20:36:56+00:00): 'Rathgar Road'? Where did you get that from? Here: http://www.kentonline.co.uk/gravesend/news/fight-goes-on-over-mcdonalds-40503/ ?
Colin Smale (2015-07-22 21:00:39+00:00): Indeed Steve, it corresponds with many other sources as the address for the filing station, but no sign of it as a street name so I left that alone.
sdoerr (2015-07-22 21:17:07+00:00): I see Google Maps has its address as Rathgar Road. I wonder what their source is? RM Address Finder says it's Watling Street, based on the postcode, but we can't copy that.
d1g (2015-07-22 18:26:11+00:00): Добрый вечер! В целом - стоит в первую очередь отмечать инфраструктуру, а не правила для конкретного маршрутизатора

Некоторые маршрутизаторы очень умные и поддерживают много via-точек либо площадные "запретные зоны"

https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.589909%2C45.936874&point=51.589503%2C45.939599&point=51.589076%2C45.937282&point=51.586756%2C45.938312&vehicle=foot&locale=ru&elevation=true&layer=MapQuest

Если же править дороги для "хороших" маршрутов то можно лишиться коротких путей: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing/online_routers#Comparison_matrix

Т.е. не стоит зимой стирать дороги потому что там снег не убирают - есть специальный тег для этого: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:snowplowing и ждать его поддержи в навигаторах либо настроить его один раз самому для зимы.
Skippern (2015-07-22 19:06:57+00:00): Lucas, voce mudou a Rua Santa Rosa para pedestres? Parecendo que parte central desse rua e highway=footway + oneway=yes, se for mudado assim, talvez tirar o oneway?

O local ficando bem legal com as edifícios traçados, e muito trabalho, né?
LucFreitas (2015-07-22 19:37:56+00:00): Oi, Skippern. Na verdade, alterei esta parte central pois a mesma está em obras. Assim, por enquanto, apenas os pedestres podem trafegar nas calçadas. As obras começaram mês passado e serão finalizadas daqui a alguns meses, e então passará a ser uma via de pedestres. Mantive o oneway pois fiquei em dúvida se deveria remover agora ou mantê-lo por conta do histórico da via, caso fosse necessário restaurar a situação anterior.

Sobre as edificações, dá trabalho mesmo. Vou desenhar neste espaço, pois achei interessante como eles estão implantados nas quadras, de forma bastante irregular, mas praticamente sem afastamentos, ocupando quase todo o terreno,
Skippern (2015-07-22 19:43:38+00:00): Como lembro esse area precisava um reforma mesmo, e o mapa ficando legal com isso. Bom trabalho
LucFreitas (2015-07-23 01:31:45+00:00): Obrigado.