piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2022-10-14 07:02:39+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)
Danke, dass Du hilfst die Daten aktuell zu halten.

Eine kleine Anmerkung: Du hast bei "building" den Wert "industrial" gelöscht. Der Wert ist aber (so wie ich das Luftbild und die vorherige Nutzung deute) korrekt. Wenn sich die Nutzungsart des Gebäudes ändert, dann gibt es den tag "building:use=" und dort kann dann ein passender Wert gesetzt werden.
Beispiel: Eine Kirche wird profanisiert und dort ist nun ein Restaurant im Gebäude. building=church bleibt davon unbetroffen. building:use=restaurant würde dann zusätzlich gesetzt werden.

Weiter frohes mappen
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127403983
silversurfer83 (2022-10-14 07:05:01+00:00): (sehe grad: durch das komplette Löschen des "building=" tags ist das Gebäude auch ganz von der Karte verschwunden. Hab das korrigiert und jetzt sollte es auch wieder da sein)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127403983
eggie (2022-10-13 08:11:05+00:00): Dag Hidde...  Je vraagt feedback.. Hier zie je wat je hebt gedaan
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127404119

Ik zie hier geen verwijderingen.

MVG
eggie
HiddeV22 (2022-10-13 10:46:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599541217
Als je de bovenstaande link aanklikt zie dat ik een node heb verwijderd...
eggie (2022-10-13 10:59:40+00:00): Die import van die masten 

height	=28	>>>  height 28;30

Het lijkt om je iets hebt samengevoegd... Twee hoogtes gecombineerd. 
Die import van die masten zijn uit timestamp	2009-12-26 12:47.
Daar zal sowieso niet veel meer van kloppen. 
Het was een massaimport die ook nog eens niet op de juiste plaats terecht kwam.  Die GSM 1800 is er volgens mij nog steeds .. Nu linksboven.
eggie (2022-10-13 11:02:08+00:00): Even een tijdelijke revert gedaan..  De vier masten van voor je edit zijn weer terug.
HiddeV22 (2022-10-13 11:10:31+00:00): Aha, dat is er dus gebeurd. Is het nog waardevol om een databank van de overheid te checken voor welke er op het moment in zitten? En wat is trouwens de norm voor dit soort masten, moet je ze mappen als één node, met verschillende tags voor verschillende communicatie, (en dus ook een tag bij die node voor bijvboorbeeld een luchtalarm die erin hangt), of allemaal aparte nodes zoals het er stond?
eggie (2022-10-13 11:23:34+00:00): Die onderdelen zitten natuurlijk allemaal op één mast, maar we voegen aparte nodes toe. Het zijn zelfs verschillende bedrijven die ze toevoegen en het wijzigt van tijd tot tijd.  Er zijn verschillende draadjes over te vinden op het forum en net zoveel meningen :)

Hier de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dantenna

Het is doorlopend veranderd.
tower werd bv mast werd antenna..  
Hier zo'n draadje..

Nederlandse draadjes zijn er ook, 
maar kan ik zo snel niet vinden. 

En anders een vraagje voor ons nieuwe Forum..

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Groet
eggie
cyton (2022-10-13 14:00:23+00:00): I was unsure where to draw the line, I'll have a closer look later
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127404610
ChrissW-R1 (2024-12-30 02:34:49+00:00): Updated in https://osm.org/changeset/128430826

Thanks @cyton
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-15 17:53:47+00:00): usaste etiquetas con valores en español, debes usar las etiquetas en inglés. por ejemplo acceso=no. Lo segundo que pones instrucciones en la vía (derecho de vía) esto es incorrecto.
user_17388506 (2022-10-15 23:52:01+00:00): No se quién seas ni te conozco pero como mexicano que soy no tengo porque usar un idioma que no es mio
Además quién administra el municipio es el presidente del mismo
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-22 22:45:38+00:00): No importa en qué país vivas o el idioma que hables, en este proyecto las etiquetas están estandarizadas y deben estar en inglés. Solo los nombres propios pueden estar en el idioma nativo. Voy a deshacer esta parte de tu edición.
Littlebtc (2023-03-09 09:49:44+00:00): 您好，編輯地圖時發現您的貢獻似乎與當地現況存在重大差異，所以容我先回退您的部分貢獻

希望您未來如果仍有機會繼續繪製 OpenStreetMap，請盡量貢獻真實的地方資訊，感謝
Supaplex (2023-03-09 10:01:38+00:00): reverted by littlebtc in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133471367
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127404985
adiatmad (2022-10-12 13:17:19+00:00): Good day!
Your edits look great. But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name i.e name=House (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103143057). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
adiatmad (2022-10-20 04:13:15+00:00): Good day! Your edits look great (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103145174). Allow me to suggest you press Q to square buildings. Happy mapping!
Carto'Cité (2022-10-20 10:23:12+00:00): Bonjour Romy,
Je supprime cette piste que tu as ajoutée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103146389) car elle est en doublon avec l'aménagement déjà décrit sur la rue adjacente et qui décrit les passages de la piste en bande à certains endroits.
N’hésite pas si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
user_5359 (2022-10-19 06:37:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10095006126. what is the meaning of mand_made = yes?
HellMap (2022-10-19 10:01:00+00:00): Hi! That was a mistake. I of course meant `man_made=yes`. There's a prominent feature, but I have no idea what it is, so I cannot be more specific. Here it is on Mapillary, but it's a bit distant:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3371163416448544
Kovoschiz (2022-10-12 13:03:34+00:00): Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=`. That's for actual proper names only. Use `description:zh=`.
Supaplex (2022-10-12 11:52:57+00:00): 眼科診所應該用診所而非醫院的類別
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127406929
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Johnny Carlsen (2023-06-22 01:12:04+00:00): I was wondering why 1317 has been so deserted for almost a year now, and then I found that it was made into a one-way street about 8 months ago.

Though it is great for reducing traffic on the road as nobody from the city will be routed out this way, I think we might want to fix that.

There have also been a lot of recent development on the road, I'll see if I can get it fixed.
I'll see if I can fix it so we can get traffic flowing again on this road.
AlaskaDave (2023-06-22 02:40:27+00:00): Oops.

I must have screwed something up when I was adding the second side of the carriageway.

Hopefully, you were able to fix it Johnny.
Johnny Carlsen (2023-06-22 06:46:14+00:00): I assumed you began the process of splitting the road into two as it has become divided, but probably was distracted before you got to finish it.

I think I've got it right now, but if you see any mistakes of my own, feel free to fix it :)
eggie (2023-03-30 09:19:26+00:00): 
Erik, 
En hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164142435#map=19/52.08261/5.53774

Voeg je bicycle=yes toe, maar halverwege staat er ook weer vehicle=no Was al getagd en hier correct volgens mij. Dacht dat het alleen wandelen is hier.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1t7u

MVG
eggie
Erik vd S (2023-04-01 13:44:53+00:00): Hi Eggie, dank voor je reactie! Toen ik er liep werd er gefietst. Maar dat wil natuurlijk niet zeggen dat het mag. De aard van het pas was ook eerder een voetpad. In de historie staat ook aardig wat variatie. Jouw aanpassing lijkt me terecht. Met vriendelijke groeten, Erik
eggie (2023-04-01 14:48:30+00:00): Het is ook niet allemaal even duidelijk daar. Wanneer je het pad vanaf restaurant De Dennen neemt mocht je in het verleden fietsen.... maar dan kom je van die sluisachtige hekjes tegen waar een fiets niet in past. Hoe het nu zit.. geen idee. 
Zal nog wel eens goed kijken daar.
itineris (2023-10-24 20:48:00+00:00): Szia!

A Baktay Ervin Gimnáziumra tett Wiki címkéid hibásak, mert azoknak a híres ember helyett magára az intézményre kellene vonatkozniuk (ha lennének).

Üdv:
Ákos
mogyoros (2023-10-25 13:03:07+00:00): Ok. Köszi. Üdv, tamás
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
NorthCrab (2022-11-27 17:22:59+00:00): Ten opis zmian niczego nie przekazuje.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse (2024-08-03 13:29:36+00:00): I've frequently (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=24119 ) complained about your railway edits being of poor quality, in the wrong place and duplicating existing features.  I had not previously realised that you are also doing this with canals https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#21/53.07310/-1.34395/H .
My original route here was from a survey in 2017; what was your source?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-15 17:56:05+00:00): ¿Por qué lo pusiste como unidireccional?
Sree1922 (2022-10-12 11:31:03+00:00): Also used imagery Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
janolezab (2022-10-12 11:55:07+00:00): This is not a meaningful changeset description for such a widespread changeset.

Please adhere to the following resource in the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Patr1k_P (2022-10-16 12:22:34+00:00): toto mi pride zbytocne a duplicitne kedze plocha tam uz bola oznacena

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103161479
Filip009 (2022-10-16 12:54:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:leisure%3Dstadium

Na wiki píšu, že to má byť značené zvlásť. leisure=pitch má značiť hraciu plochu a leisure=stadium všetko aj s tribúnami a tak.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-16 13:05:55+00:00): len skor je to asi myslene pre velke stadiony s velkymi tribunami (vo velkych mestach), pisu tam dokonca poschodove tribuny, skratka hlavne futbalove stadiony
Filip009 (2022-10-16 13:36:48+00:00): Okej, tak môžte kľudne zmazať :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SzymonH (2022-10-12 12:22:40+00:00): Dodany obszar powinien być oznaczony jako landuse=construction oraz construction=apartments. Bo nie jest to jeden budynek tylko zespół budynków: https://budros.pl/mieszkania/mysliwska-24/
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-12 12:30:06+00:00): I jeszcze jest uwaga do zamknięcia https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2964710
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
habi (2026-03-25 09:49:43+00:00): Die Mürbel Meijerink GmbH nur mit Namen in OpenStreetMap zu erfassen, ist (fast) sinnlos.
Können bei denen auch Mürbel direkt gekauft werden, oder werden die hier "nur" produziert?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-10-12 18:48:15+00:00): Smaller change sets please
riiga (2022-10-12 20:48:55+00:00): Hur kom du fram till att detta ska vara ett gångfartsområde och inte en  uppfart?

Jag har rättat det men uppskattar gärna ett svar på varför ändringen gjordes.
clarre1 Postnord (2022-10-13 11:19:56+00:00): Hej!
Jag gjorde en ny väg inte någon ändring.
Jag fundera faktiskt på vad de borde vara men du har nog rätt. Tänkte väl att det gick köra bli där också.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:15:32+00:00): Hallo Ringanker, danke für die Änderung.

Kurze Rückfrage: Musste der Weg wirklich gelöscht werden, oder hätte auch das Hinzufügen des Tags access=private gereicht? Danke.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Ringanker (2022-10-13 07:09:17+00:00): Hallo Pitscheplatsch,
es gibt an dieser Stelle keinen Weg.
Auf beiden Seiten des Schöps ist Privatgrundstück. Die Brücke hat der Eigentümer für sich selbst gebaut.
bwbuz (2024-09-26 17:43:58+00:00): Frisch gepflügte Brandschneisen immer wieder als Wege einzuzeichnen verbessert unsere Karten nicht sondern beschert uns das genau Gegenteil.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
b-jazz (2022-10-15 16:52:09+00:00): Did you check your work after you ran this "simplification"? It left 100+ tiny little ways that had nothing to do with reality. I'd suggest avoiding this time of change in the future until you understand what it leaves you with.
Frans S (2022-10-12 14:54:47+00:00): Hello. 
Please read my comments on the other changesets and improve your mapping skills before proceeding.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127413651
Frans S (2022-10-31 12:52:16+00:00): Hello Rach
I solved the issues. 
Please review the tips and hints I send you in my comments
Best regards
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-22 08:54:16+00:00): Ciao. La relazione 14687539 è duplicata della 12754206. Inoltre, l'osmc:symbol è errato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 11:30:12+00:00): grazie, ho risolto
riiga (2022-10-12 20:46:32+00:00): Hur kom du fram till att detta ska vara en serviceväg och inte en gågata som skyltarna på plats säger?

Jag har rättat det men uppskattar gärna ett svar på varför ändringen gjordes.
stuff62 POSTNORD (2022-10-13 05:33:47+00:00): Ledsen rent slarv stirrade mig blind på Timmermang 1c
user_1566574 (2023-03-01 10:15:09+00:00): Salut !
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/713531702 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/713531702) et donc https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6708811699, je crois qu'on risque de jouer longtemps à ce jeu du "défaire le travail de l'autre". :/

C'est à dire, tu es en faveur d'ajouter un nœud indiquant la présence d'un dos d'âne/plateau traversant/autre.
Et moi, en faveur d'être plus précis sur l'étendu de l'aménagement. Et à tour de rôle, apparemment, on défait le travail de l'autre... Ça pourrait durer longtemps, donc : Parlons-en.
Le Wiki autorise les deux usages : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
Je crois qu'un nœud, c'est bien, dans le cas où l'imagerie n'est pas nette, quand par exemple à la suite de relevés terrain il est difficile de cartographier précisément l'emprise, ou pour des "petits" aménagements type traffic_calming=bump.
Mais quand c'est possible, je préfère donc cartographier l'emprise exacte, pour connaître la longueur notamment, comme avec traffic_calming=table ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665229894.

Discutons-en, laissons la communauté trancher si besoin, mais la pratique ne peut pas continuer. :/
Autrement, merci pour tes contribs, bonne semaine ! :D
eggie (2022-10-12 13:10:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Iets uittesten kan wel, maar beter is dan om niet voor upload te kiezen. Ik draai de changeset even terug. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-12 13:11:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #127415708

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust
groet
eggie
Noktoborus (2023-11-09 11:00:55+00:00): Здравствуйте.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110318057

Что это такое?
Noktoborus (2023-11-09 11:03:55+00:00): Извините, не та ссылка, эта корректная:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103180578
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:47:02+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127479928
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127414559
Marek-M (2022-10-12 20:32:53+00:00): Cześć, czy parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460200873 został zlikwidowany?
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:00:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings on both changesets  are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Quality prevails over quantity


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127414732
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-12 13:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127416733 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in the USA - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6442
Carto'Cité (2023-02-07 15:57:57+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour l'ajout de la piste cyclable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103182426 le long de l'Avenue des Marronniers à Beauchamp. Je me demande ce qu'il en est des piétons : la piste est-elle partagée avec les piétons, y a-t-il une séparation entre piétons et cyclistes (piste ségréguée : segregated=yes), ou les piétons sont-ils invités à utiliser l'autre trottoir ? Par ailleurs la piste est-elle bien bidirectionnelle ? 
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Romy G (2023-02-08 08:56:31+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,
La piste est bien séparée avec les piétons (piste bidirectionnelle le long du bois / trottoir d'1,5m côté route.
A dispo si besoin,
Romain
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-12 13:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127416733 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in the USA - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6442
Warin61 (2023-05-04 08:41:57+00:00): Hi,
The relation 14687606 tagged landuse=religious and building=yes? In OSM building=yes mean that the whole are is a building .. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
I think that you possibly mean that there are buildings here. In OSM that characteristic is not mapped, preference is to map the actual buildings. This tagging causes the building that are mapped in this are to be obscured.
Leo Slager (2024-08-26 08:39:20+00:00): Je hebt hier ook toegevoegd height=0.
Dat is natuurlijk niet correct.
Is dat een preset die je nog steeds gebruikt ?
Of is dat per ongeluk zo gedaan ?
literan (2022-10-12 17:16:31+00:00): сдается, что на фабрику вход для всех по пропускам, не только для авто https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1264725985#map=19/55.78714/37.65533