piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nammala (2016-11-09 10:14:29+00:00): Hi Angello04,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you are deleting a lot of information without any comment. Since OpenStreetMap is an crowdsourced data it is not fair deleting other work. May I know the reason behind doing this.

regards,
nammala
Alecs01 (2016-11-18 18:25:00+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43774380
nammala (2016-11-21 04:18:45+00:00): Thanks @Alecs01for doing this :)
indigomc (2016-11-18 19:11:28+00:00): This addition seems to be in the middle of farm fields. I've disabled the 'school' tag, to render it invisible. Please check the position and provide some corroboration.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:50:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The name of the street: Are this address of the buildings, you can reached?
GOwin (2016-11-09 04:17:11+00:00): Please do not abbreviate. If this is a school, the more appropriate name is "Santo Rosario Elementary School."
geohacker (2016-11-09 03:36:49+00:00): Hi g sumithra - welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you are having a great time adding POIs in and around Bangalore. I'm also intrigued that you are part of a group of people adding POIs at the same time. 

Could you tell us the source of these POIs? This is important to know to make sure OpenStreetMap stays clear of proprietary data and unauthorised copies. 

Happy mapping.
geohacker (2016-11-09 03:39:12+00:00): Hi sridevi - welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you are having a great time adding POIs in and around Bangalore. I also just messaged g sumithra because I think you are part of the same team.

Could you tell us the source of these POIs? This is important to know to make sure OpenStreetMap stays clear of proprietary data and unauthorised copies.

Happy mapping.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-03-11 09:44:43+00:00): Hi, Naim Fahmi,
Just to inform you.. I have changed the way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214792283 to tertiary. before it was unclassifed. the connection with secondary and primary road with the good surface make this road could be upgraded to tertiary. thank you
GOwin (2016-11-09 04:16:00+00:00): please use appropriate tags.  Funeral homes are tagged as
shop = funeral_directors

see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors
DiahW IRM-ED (2022-12-01 02:28:17+00:00): Hi, Thet Zaw Tun, thank you for your mapping contribution!

Your edit looks awesome, but I need to delete the building due not exist on the imagery (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30233/task/142649859). If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.

Thank you
VictorIE (2017-04-19 09:58:21+00:00): This appears to be on the wrong continent.
VictorIE (2017-09-16 23:06:24+00:00): Deleted
iWowik (2016-11-09 15:55:39+00:00): День добрый!
в addr:street принято писать точно как name на улице, вместе со словом улица
iWowik (2016-11-09 15:58:12+00:00): И буквы в номере дома принято использовать заглавные и без пропуска
2А, а не 2 А.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:46:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
AntEntro (2017-12-14 17:37:53+00:00): 请不要为了渲染效果而将“草堂接待区”标识为郊区，这不合适。实际上只是有机农场而已，我也有所了解。稍后我将更改过来。
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:45:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 20:58:44+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
pintoch (2016-11-26 16:41:02+00:00): hi, thanks for your edit. Are you sure these are really campsites? How did you discover them?
vwJim (2016-11-27 00:51:57+00:00): Hi,

I've only added the WC one day last week. I've not added any campsites.

Regards,

Jim
pintoch (2016-11-27 09:33:41+00:00): Hi,
Well, this changeset (the one we are commenting on, that you closed 18 days ago) includes many campsites, right?
Thanks,
pintoch
vwJim (2016-11-27 10:10:13+00:00): Hi, 

I thought this had been resolved a while back. 

I used MapMe while on holiday to tag all the places we camped at. Then when we got back to the UK, I signed up to have a MapMe account, and in doing so,  all the offline data from my phone seems to have been uploaded online without asking me if it should be. 

So apologies. Virtually all those locations are wild camping locations that I tagged for my own use. They were never meant to be uploaded. Someone else said they'd deleted them all a little while ago.
pintoch (2016-11-27 10:31:05+00:00): this has just been fixed by user trigpoint.
vwJim (2016-11-27 10:33:04+00:00): Thanks.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:28:03+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Noen (2021-11-29 17:44:10+00:00): Hi! You connected the OSM element for the Norwegian city of Kristiansund with the Wikidata element for the municipality of Kristiansund in the this changeset. The changeset is 5 years old, but please use more care when adding Wikidata tags in the future.
LisandroMDQ (2016-11-09 19:08:51+00:00): Hola Nicfer, estoy viendo en Mar del Plata, la linea del FFCC Roca entre Mar del Plata y Miramar quedó totalmente erronea, habría que ver cómo revertirlo.

Saludos
Supaplex (2016-11-09 12:52:39+00:00): 這不是寵物店吧？
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:43:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 20:59:20+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
vasony (2017-01-04 14:59:13+00:00): Szia!

Meg tudod mondani milyen utcanév változott meg még a Károlyin kívül, és ez mikor volt?

Tamás
geri-oc (2016-11-11 19:21:35+00:00): Es kann schon getaggt als abandoned:place werden - sollte dann aber old_name=Veitlenshof heißen.

Eventuell ist auch place=locality angebracht:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place=locality?uselang=de

Und wenn es geht eine Website/Wikipedia verlinken, damit man sich darunter etwas vorstellen kann (image=?).
Chrysopras (2016-11-12 09:26:47+00:00): Da hast Du sicher recht. Ich wollte mit meinem Edit allerdings nur den fehlenden Wortabstand zwischen "ehem." und "Veitlenshof" wiederherstellen (weil mich so etwas immer ärgert ;-).

Das korrekte Tagging sollten wir eigentlich im Änderungssatz http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42510325 diskutieren, mit dem dieser Node angelegt wurde, vom Kollegen Freischneider. Freischneider ist wohl auch der richtige Ansprechpartner, da der den Node angelegt hat und die Gegend kennt …
Hjart (2016-11-09 08:04:34+00:00): Why are you adding the contact prefix? I don't see any advantage to it at all.
thetornado76 (2016-11-09 17:01:18+00:00): Hi,
this is the "new" tag for any contacts. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
Only when I change a Node I change the contact Tag.
Bye thetornado76
Hjart (2016-11-09 22:31:19+00:00): I just had a look at the discussion page for the contact: tag and particularly noticed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:contact#Deprecate_this_tag_family. Personally I agree. Please, at least in Denmark, do not add any more of these.
thetornado76 (2016-11-10 05:54:17+00:00): I doesn't know this discussion. Thanks and Sorry
Allroads (2016-11-10 11:37:46+00:00): Validation: Overlapping ways.
tag combination.
area:highway=yes
footway=sidewalk
Allroads (2016-11-10 11:43:21+00:00): landuse=residential
overlapping identical
streinger (2016-11-09 09:05:47+00:00): вернул как было. Когда построят "обход города Оренбурга", тогда это будет primary, на данный момент  строится лишь часть этой дороги между развязкой на Беляевку и ул. Донгузской(Р-239).
clay_c (2016-12-08 21:58:06+00:00): Hi, why did you change the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs to parks? They are detention basins, not parks.
clay_c (2016-12-08 21:58:28+00:00): Hi, where did you find the name "George Bush Park/Eldridge Park"?
Carnildo (2016-11-09 19:19:42+00:00): Where are you getting the name "Grand Junction" and the presence of a stop sign on a railroad from?
indigomc (2016-11-11 07:33:16+00:00): You deleted an important road 'Thambuchettypalya Main Road' n this edit without adequate reason. Accordingly I've reverted the edit. Please check before updating, and if there is a good reason, make sure you give it. Thanks.
CriOnsKry (2016-11-12 13:11:54+00:00): Будьте любезны обосновать.
indigomc (2016-11-11 07:43:06+00:00): Reverted this one.
Alecs01 (2016-11-12 18:57:00+00:00): Same as here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43586101 in this changeset you even joined a bridge to a river https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4490051800, what's the rationale behind this?
indigomc (2016-11-11 07:42:06+00:00): Reverted this one also. See the history. You deleted a long road and replaced it with a short one.
indigomc (2016-11-11 07:46:46+00:00): This road  replaced another that you deleted.It does not have enough points. The road that you deleted has other sections that have now gone, with other roads that connected to it now ending in nothing. In other words you deleted other peoples' work. Please correct.
indigomc (2016-11-12 07:56:30+00:00): Now reverted
Robert Whittaker (2017-05-04 22:03:44+00:00): The address on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4490141297 (2 Mill Farm Road, NE39 1NW) appears to correspond to a location somwhere near http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.902593&mlon=-1.776433&zoom=16#map=16/54.9026/-1.7764&layers=N rather than the industrial area off the A694 where the node is currently positioned. Do you know if the details are correct?
VehoMMC (2017-05-05 07:55:10+00:00): Hi,
Well I must have at the time, but it was a while ago and I can't remember. Fell free to delete it/change it if you wish, as I no longer map.
Jame Thomas (2017-07-24 04:39:32+00:00): So So
Rom1 (2016-11-09 11:43:14+00:00): Bonjour, ce serait bien de modifier le tag source des objets recalés genre "cadastre recalé avec BDOrtho IGN" (à noter au passage l'écriture BDOrtho sans espace).
Emeltet (2016-11-09 13:26:44+00:00): Bonjour Rom1, ok pour les modifications suivantes mais est-ce possible de revenir sur le commentaire d'une précédente modification ?
Rom1 (2016-11-09 13:33:56+00:00): Les attributs du groupe de modification tu veux dire ? Si oui, non on ne peut pas. Il reste néanmoins la possibilité d'ajouter un commentaire via la discussion.
Emeltet (2016-11-09 13:49:49+00:00): Donc je pense que ton commentaire est suffisant.
Mevess (2023-12-18 14:11:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette rue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46532040 s'appelle Chemin de Sainte-Maxime sur le cadastre ainsi que sur la BD Topo.
L'avez-vous renommée par erreur ?
Merci
NJ
chimel38 (2023-12-19 09:50:58+00:00): Pas souvenir de ce traitement via maproulette semble t'il j'ai corrigé effectivement les adresses certifiées viennent confirmer le problème. Merci pour cette alerte.
mueschel (2016-11-12 14:00:15+00:00): Hi,
way 389961326 has the tag 'adpoted =no' that doesn't make sense to me. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
trigpoint (2016-11-12 14:56:29+00:00): That looks like a typo, it should be adopted=no.
Paul Berry (2016-11-13 14:22:08+00:00): My mistake; thanks for correcting it, @mueschel.
gileri (2016-11-09 20:51:37+00:00): Bonne idée !
Hjart (2016-11-09 11:31:06+00:00): Jeg har ændret dette idet betegnelsen "Storkesøen" reelt dækker over området https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74888162 og ikke kun søen du markerede.
maxerickson (2017-11-13 19:23:04+00:00): Please make sure that the wikidata "instance of" matches the OSM feature classification when doing this type of edit.

See https://twitter.com/kgjenkins/status/928752201874501633

Thanks,

Max
mavl (2016-11-09 17:58:57+00:00): Спасибо. На этом съезде ещё остался тег construction=tertiary. Я его удалил.
anpk (2016-11-10 08:49:54+00:00): Кстати на этой развязке еще съезд с Монтажников на 30 лет Победы вдоль гаражей ГК "Камвольщик", но не официально так как не уложен финишный слой асфальта. Я геометрию его изменил вчера, но вот стоит ли его отмечать открытым или нет не знаю...
mavl (2016-11-10 08:53:44+00:00): Думаю, с этим не нужно спешить.
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-05 20:41:20+00:00): Azt szeretném kérdezni, hogy a „Civil Rádió adótorony” biztosan ott van? Nem emlékszem rá, hogy élőben láttam volna, és légifelvételeken sem találom a fák között. És persze néhány tíz méterre Ny-DNy-ra az elkerített telken van egy nagy adótorony.
Bratkó József (2019-11-06 04:18:18+00:00): Stúdiójuk a Fonó Budai házába van onnan van mikró átlövés a Hármashatár hegyi adó toronyra. Korábban amikor még hárman voltunk egy frekvencián osztott idővel FIKSZ R, TILOS R. Civil R. akkor mindenki a saját adóját használta. Az adó 50 Wattos de a végfoka RF 100 Watt megy ki róla. Sajnos ez az adó FM: 98MHZ 2019 december 20-tól megszűnik úgy néz ki végleg!
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-06 08:07:09+00:00): Köszönöm a gyors választ! Nem az adó létére, hanem pontos elhelyezkedésére céloztam. A Hármashatár-hegyen van több adótorony is, ezért a laikus számára az lenne a logikus, hogy ezek egyikére van rögzítve ez az antenna (úgy hívják? hány méteres egy ilyen?), és nem egy étterem kertjében vagy a kerítésén van.
Bratkó József (2019-11-06 10:04:49+00:00): Igen ott van! Vízműveknek van ott egy kis épület tetején található az adó antenna.
Mellette található
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-06 12:39:31+00:00): Köszönöm a felvilágosítást, így minden világos!
Bratkó József (2019-11-07 03:39:21+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5547589,18.9993691,2a,75y,307.94h,126.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scSS52r_Mvz8oAqZgodV7OA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-07 08:09:44+00:00): Akkor mégis rossz helyre van berajzolva a Civil Rádió adója! A szervizútnak a DK-i oldalára van berajzolva. Az utcácskának ezen az oldalán van a kék vízcsap is, ami szintén be van rajzolva az OSM-be. Ezen az oldalon van az Udvarház Étterem.  Viszont a vízmű és igazából az adótorony is a szervizút ÉNy-i oldalán van a landuse=industrial jelölésű területen.
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-07 08:17:55+00:00): Nyilván nem ez a legnagyobb probléma a térképen! De annak az ösvénynek (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452245123) a létezésében sem vagyok olyan biztos. Ahogy látom, az évek során néhányan újra és újra igazgattuk, de lehet, hogy csak a csatlakozó utak szerkesztése miatt értünk hozzá, nem magát az ösvényt pontosítottuk.
chnav (2018-01-09 10:02:13+00:00): Мы не рисуем полосы или следы на дороге. В местах отдыха есть разметка, но нет разделительной полосы, там одна проезжая часть. Вернул M-32 назад, оставил сами зоны отдыха.
mueschel (2016-11-10 16:06:24+00:00): Hi,
I found 172 objects with the wrong tag "builging" - could you check the changeset and fix this?

Thanks, Jan
PT-53 (2016-11-23 09:10:21+00:00): Hallo Fubix,
im OSM-Inspector wird hier eine Fehlermeldung "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.20489&lat=47.77033&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,misspelled_node_keys,misspelled_way_keys,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,unwayed_segments,ways_without_tags
Kümmerst Du dich darum ?
Grüße
letihu (2016-11-15 22:08:47+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452254798/history
darstellen?
aceman444 (2020-08-21 22:04:53+00:00): Zdravim, preco by na tu Trnavsku cestu nemali mat pristup chodci? Kde je tam taka zakazova znacka? Chapem, ze je to nebezpecne, ale ak tam zakaz nie je, tak tam foot=no nepatri. Lepsie by bolo foot=use_sidepath.
bobindel (2020-08-23 15:07:18+00:00): Súhlasím, taká značka tam určite nie je ani nebola. Moja chyba.
adrianojbr (2016-11-30 22:12:29+00:00): olá, m72. novamente corrigi os edifícios dentro de edifícios na praia de canasvieiras. veja mais sobre mapeamento vertical (3D) em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings. abraço.
Martin Borsje (2016-11-10 06:13:41+00:00): Gerrit,

YOu created overlapping landuses; even residential inside residential.
What is the purpose of this incorrect edits?
Further you put individual landuse=construction on houses under construction, which is not correct.
What is the construction:building=* for new element?
Again individual drawing of parcels as landuse within greater landuse?
martinum4 (2016-11-16 23:57:12+00:00): Hello, are the sources you mentioned free to be used for OSM?
martinum4 (2016-11-16 23:57:29+00:00): Also i think you got the names mixed up a bit...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-05-03 22:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58662814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs in Nepal (most already removed).
utvonalfelmeresek (2016-11-10 13:38:03+00:00): Jó lenne egységesíteni a rendszert, mert most itt nem látszik a bélyegző:
http://friss.openstreetmap.hu/#18/48.00295/19.50993
Domcsi (2016-11-10 13:55:49+00:00): Szólni kell az Andrásnak hogy írja át,mert a k2 a himalájában van nem nálunk.
Itt is jó:

http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6698139

és nálam is így jelenik meg jól:

http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/?osmid=377651458,452063752,367963420,367967254,118444252,336633145,317502960,317502962
marczoutendijk (2016-11-10 09:27:17+00:00): Mag die source die jij opvoert gebruikt worden op OSM?
chnav (2016-11-10 07:08:59+00:00): У нас серьёзный проект, пожалуйста не хулиганьте. Фонтан удалил.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-09 19:13:20+00:00): Hi Gerrit,
What's the licence associated with the source "Basisregistratie Gemeentelijke Topografie" that you're using here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
RicoElectrico (2018-09-30 23:12:52+00:00): Cześć,

Według adresów jakie tutaj są, oraz potwierdzając w Streetview -  tutaj jest ulica Poznańska. To musi być jakiś błąd z Twojej strony.
indigomc (2016-11-09 16:30:57+00:00): Hi Buch_kp

What sort of castle is this please. Can you provide any references, or is it just your home?

Thanks, user indigomc
GinaroZ (2016-11-09 20:14:46+00:00): Hi, just wondering if you meant to adjust the geometry of Warriston Road?
eggie (2017-04-11 10:39:47+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit. Je welkomstmail..
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
Endres Pelka (2016-11-10 06:17:21+00:00): How about writing more descriptively? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
andygol (2016-11-11 19:24:20+00:00): Bonya_23
не треба додавати вигадані дані (тобто не треба мапити під рендер)! 

Пропоную вам самотужки вилучити оці всі вигадани путівці.
Richard (2016-11-12 22:01:12+00:00): I can't fault your enthusiasm, but these aren't tracks ("roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; usually unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps"), and they're too transitory to map in OSM. Sorry.
mavl (2016-11-13 06:06:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, Bonya_23. Вы добавляете необычные данные. Возможно, вы используете неправильные теги для объектов. Напишите, пожалуйста, что именно вы хотели обозначить в этом пакете правок.
Bonya_23 (2016-11-13 10:35:18+00:00): Здравствуйте, я была уверена что это дороги по которым ездит трактор,  но если это не так,  то я удалю.
mavl (2016-11-13 10:56:20+00:00): На спутником снимке Bing в этом месте не видно полевых дорог. В любом случае дороги, добавленные вами, представляют собой кольца. При этом нельзя попасть с одного кольца на другое. Полевая дорога должна начинаться от какой-нибудь другой дороги (например, от дороги между населёнными пунками) и показывать путь, по которому техника выезжает в поле. При этом по самому полю эта техника может передвигаться любым образом (например, при вспахивании земли) без дорог. Поэтому в данному случае такие дороги в поле не нужны и их можно удалить.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Bonya_23 (2016-11-13 11:14:41+00:00): Хорошо, мну удалять по одной или как то целым пакетом? 
Мне потом не придет жалоба по поподу того что я много удаляю?
mavl (2016-11-13 11:20:59+00:00): Можно удалить все дороги вместе. Чтобы у участников не было вопросов при отправке данных на сервер укажите примерной такой комментарий к пакету правок "Удалены ошибочно добавленные полевые дороги" (это комментарий самого пакета правок, а не комментарий его обсуждения). Можете написать по-русски, если ещё не привыкли писать на языке местности, которую правите. Если другим участникам будет интересно, они сами переведут на свой язык.
Bonya_23 (2016-11-13 11:22:20+00:00): Ок
andygol (2016-11-15 20:51:39+00:00): Bonya_23 - я вилучив ваші "путівці" ;)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andygol/diary/39891
hsc666 (2022-02-15 11:30:19+00:00): Auch wenn es schon ein paar Tage her ist - Du hast hier an https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1678411666 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1678411683 die AS Longerich entfernt. Ein Anonymer bemängelt das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3052336 mMn zu Recht. Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen? Was war denn der Grund für das Löschen?
hsimpson (2022-02-17 10:30:43+00:00): Hi, ich habe das in der Note kommentiert. Die "Anschlussstelle Longerich" existiert de-facto nicht, das ganze Konstrukt mit Anschlussstelle und Autobahnkreuz heißt schlicht "Kreuz Köln-Nord". Grüße
letihu (2016-11-15 22:01:50+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452274853/history
darstellen?
Supaplex (2016-11-09 18:24:23+00:00): 有些東西怪怪的，在田旁邊?
literan (2016-11-10 12:34:05+00:00): Еще одна попытка спама на kuda.go - и вы будете заблокированы навечно. Все ссылки вычищаю.
Andrey Prohorov (2017-12-01 06:01:04+00:00): Дом 22 по ул. Некрасова на самом деле это два дома: 22 и 22 к2. Надо бы поправить.
messpert (2016-11-11 19:30:43+00:00): This nonsense needs reverting immediately.
FTA (2016-11-11 23:08:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43572241
GinaroZ (2016-11-09 19:48:23+00:00): Christian, this is the second time I've seen you add schools that are not present in the real world.

Please can you google the name before you add a missing school? If you did that you have found that the school has moved to a new campus nearby: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4365135711

Also, if you checked the map after you added the school, as you would have seen a line of the outline with "former:amenity=school".
iWowik (2016-11-15 11:26:14+00:00): День добрый!
А что не так было с точкой города, что вы ее удалили?