piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naoliv (2015-05-25 17:23:37+00:00): Pode ser que seja melhor utilizar o forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=74 (precisa se inscrever também nele para postar)
Mas de qualquer forma, é bom perguntar (em qualquer um dos meios) para deixar os objetos representados de forma mais correta.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-13 22:06:02+00:00): Hej
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344740877 - rondo musi być w drugą stronę (klawisz R w JOSM)
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96049794 - ślepa i tertiary? nie bardzo :-) poza tym zdjąć tag junction=roundabout z niej
Pozdrawiam
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-14 10:14:15+00:00): Poprawiłem, jakby co.
naoliv (2015-05-22 13:08:15+00:00): O que você quis representar nessa sua edição?
DaCor (2015-05-18 15:22:56+00:00): About time someone did this, nice work
tosky (2015-05-21 22:34:26+00:00): Questa modifica assomiglia più ad una prova. Pertanto provvedo ad annullarla.
maraf24 (2015-05-14 21:53:22+00:00): Jaki był cel usunięcia informacji o drodze w tym miejscu? Bez tego mostka nie będzie na mapie widać. A i nawigacja nikogo tędy nie poprowadzi.
maraf24 (2015-06-13 00:25:08+00:00): Przywróciłem drogę.
I proszę wpisywać komentarze.
eggie (2019-09-26 15:38:11+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
GerdP (2015-11-03 22:11:20+00:00): please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393990167
had confusing tags (bus stop and crossing), see my changes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35067602
tosky (2015-05-21 22:34:29+00:00): Questa modifica sembra la conversione di una traccia GPS, e oltre alla mancanza di precisione si sovrappone a vie esistenti. Pertanto provvedo ad annullarla.
tosky (2015-05-21 22:34:30+00:00): Questa modifica sembra la conversione di una traccia GPS, e oltre alla mancanza di precisione si sovrappone a vie esistenti. Pertanto provvedo ad annullarla.
Hjart (2015-05-13 19:27:16+00:00): I'm sorry, but I'll have to revert all changesets in which you have deleted adressnodes. There are good reasons why the addresses in Denmark are on nodes rather than houses.
axelr (2015-06-04 22:00:58+00:00): Die stop_position liegt bei Bussen an der Fahrzeugspitze. Der Fußweg zwischen Platform und Straße ist überflüssig. highway=platform gehört in die Mottenkiste.
limaco (2015-05-13 16:10:21+00:00): cambio de sentido de la calle en 2014
Nakaner (2015-05-15 19:32:53+00:00): Ich habe deinen Changeset teilweise revertiert. bahnhof.de ist keine zulässige Quelle für Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap/Wheelmap.
limaco (2015-05-13 16:10:50+00:00): Cambio de sentido de la calle en 2014
limaco (2015-05-13 16:12:29+00:00): Construcción. Edificio Protegido (supuestamente, único ejemplo de construcción cantábrica en canarias)
marc__marc (2020-12-03 11:37:52+00:00): Bonjour,
la poste dit que son bureau se trouve IMMEUBLE COMMERCIAL LES CARBETS
est-ce que ce batiment est un centre commercial ? ou c'est juste le nom du batiment ?
Cordialement,
Marc
limaco (2015-05-13 16:11:30+00:00): Descripción del edificio: Facultad de Bellas Artes ULL
limaco (2015-05-13 16:12:58+00:00): Nueva construcción: edificio de viviendas
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-13 16:32:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 31082295, 31099012, 31100165, 31098855, 31099522, 31099975.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-13 17:31:13+00:00): Thanks for the contribution!  Note here the "name" tag should not be used (the tag defines what it is).  If you know the owner, an "operator" tag is great so people know who to contact in case of maintenance issues.  A "source" tag can be used to define where this data came from (e.g. "tweet with picture from a local user").
BushmanK (2015-07-24 22:08:53+00:00): Пункт проката чего?
Neeva Shakya (2015-05-13 17:15:21+00:00): Added buildings and tracks
JeSe-MX (2015-05-16 02:09:34+00:00): Buenas noches Eliud.
Ya eres parte del equipo (por lo menos de contribuidores OSM).

Te envié un mensaje con más info. 
Respecto a tu aporte, solo te comento que al agregar datos (nombres, calles, sentidos, tiendas, etc...), debe ser de tu propio conocimiento, y no basarte a otros mapas con copyright.

Saludos.
athalon012 (2015-05-13 19:00:08+00:00): It appears you reverted my changes that downgraded a few roads in their importance, primarily IN 15. What qualifies IN 15 as a primary road rather than a secondary? This puts it on the same level as a US highway such as US 33.
ullus (2015-05-14 08:50:13+00:00): Впечатляет! На Клёпики и Туму появился Бинг?
Zverik (2015-05-14 09:11:04+00:00): На Клёпики — только mapbox (поэтому я быстро сдался), а на Туму — да, Бинг. Залип случайно :)
SimonPoole (2015-05-13 19:13:19+00:00): Quelle bing für Adressen? Kannst du das etwas näher erläutern?
FahRadler (2015-05-14 10:37:10+00:00): Hallo Simon,

sofern die Adresse nicht aus meiner Fieldwork stammt so handelt es sich um Adressangaben die als Note vorlagen die von mir in das neue Gebäude übernommen wurden (z.B. Güdesweiler Höhenstraße , wenn ich Nummern vor Ort erfasse dann idR beidseitig)

Roland
TiggerGermany (2015-05-18 07:39:01+00:00): Die B14/B311 ist an dieser Stelle definitiv kein Trunk. Sonst müsstest Du anfangen zwischen allen Ausfahrten als Trunk zu mappen.
ma-rt-in (2015-11-02 18:54:35+00:00): Bitte das nächste mal, vorher gucken ob die Gebäude nicht schon vorhanden sind. Hab die jetzt mal gelöscht.
naoliv (2015-09-08 02:16:31+00:00): Rhauan, qual o nome correto do local? É "São Bento" ou "Brigadeiro"?
Rhauan Hulek Linário Leal (2015-09-08 12:26:48+00:00): O Bairro se chama "São bento" nomenclatura oficial mas é conhecido como Brigadeiro também... o mesmo ocorre com outros bairros...
naoliv (2015-09-08 12:38:30+00:00): Nesses casos o correto é colocar o outro nome nas tags "reg_name" (quando é conhecido regionalmente por determinado nome), "loc_name" (quando é conhecido localmente) ou "alt_name" (quando possui um nome alternativo).
Você saberia dizer quais os outros bairros que acontece isso também e por qual outros nomes eles são conhecidos?
Rhauan Hulek Linário Leal (2015-09-08 12:43:34+00:00): Bom saber disso, pois são muitas veriaveis, e eu gosto de editar certinho pelo menos o mais correto possível, inclusive no Waze, bom, acontece com o Bairro Caetano Filho também, conhecido como Beiral, efetuarei a correção aqui.

Obrigado pelo contato :)
sabas88 (2015-05-14 12:55:05+00:00): Ciao, per le bocce sarebbe meglio usare questi tag
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dboules

Stefano
Pilafin (2015-05-14 13:14:35+00:00): Grazie Stefano, ho implementato la tua modifica!
Ilaria
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-18 21:16:12+00:00): Another possibility is to tag "disused:shop=hairdresser" which preserves the history until the next tenant comes along.
luschi (2015-05-13 19:23:14+00:00): natural=water kann man auch verwenden, ist laut meiner Interpretation nur sinnvoll wenn es das komplette Flussbett betrifft und keine kleinen Segmente wie hier.
lg
kreuzschnabel (2017-01-01 01:28:00+00:00): Zur Info: Hab die Trennung im Rietzer Weg westlich Volkse umgemappt. So kurze bauliche Trennungen werden bevorzugt nicht als separate Ways gemappt, sondern nur als traffic_calming getaggt.
GerdP (2015-11-01 20:52:12+00:00): please review:
is it okay to replace highway=bus_stop_inactive
by disused:highway=bus_stop ?
It is only used in this changeset, see e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31112788
gormur (2015-11-01 23:54:58+00:00): Sure! You don't need to ask me for such small changes.
GerdP (2015-11-02 05:48:48+00:00): done, next time I just change and post a link
to the changesetto let you know, okay?
Rajesultanpur (2015-05-13 20:01:52+00:00): it a tru
AkageMuk (2015-05-14 07:52:45+00:00): Hi! "Narvessen" doesn't look correct, see http://narvesen.lv/ (one s)
AkageMuk (2015-05-14 07:55:40+00:00): (I mean spelling) 
Also shop=kiosk for kiosks ("convenience" is for small shops, which are not kiosks)
yurish (2015-05-14 08:50:09+00:00): Agree.
fkv (2015-06-20 16:20:23+00:00): Was hat es mit Multipolygon 5136040 auf sich? Entweder sind das lauter einzelne Glashäuser, dann sollten sie als einzelne building=greenhouse gemappt werden, also ohne ein Multipolygon. Oder es ist ein einziges großes Glashaus, dann gehört es als einziges großes building=greenhouse gemappt, also ebenfalls ohne Multipolygon. So oder so ist das Multipolygon hier nicht angebracht. Das gleiche auch bei Gebäuden in der näheren Umgebung, siehe Multipolygoncheck auf http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/. (Der meldet zwar manchmal auch Fehler, die gar keine sind, aber hier sind es wirklich Fehler.)
ERB Wetzlar (2015-05-14 07:30:28+00:00): Hvorfor har du slettet alle mine ændringer?

-VfB4ever
Hjart (2015-05-14 07:34:19+00:00): Du havde slettet en del addressenoder og jeg ville have dem tilbage igen. Derfor reverterede jeg dine ændringer. Jeg tror jeg meddelte dig dette et andet sted
letihu (2019-02-01 16:11:49+00:00): Diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344873340/history
ohne einen sinnvollen tag findet "OSMOSE" nicht so toll.
chris2map (2015-05-13 21:40:49+00:00): Hello, I allready have mapped the buildings in task #44.
Don't know why task was unlocked again while working on it.
Now we have some duplicate buildings with the change-set 31115482.
Could you remove them again?
Milli1201 (2015-05-13 21:56:46+00:00): Okay, am on it! Thank you for the message!
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-01 21:57:13+00:00): Hi, why is the house at 2323 SE Creighton Ave named "Ducks and Bunnies"?
Bickendan (2015-06-02 19:01:20+00:00): It was named by the owners and indicated on the side of the house.
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-02 19:59:53+00:00): Sounds good
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-05-15 23:29:23+00:00): Please stop contracting Εθνική Οδός to ΕΟ: it is annoying and we are not supposed to be mapping just for the renderer.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:44+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-14 13:11:49+00:00): Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3392408789 actually exist?  It seems to be placed between the road and the buildings.  Perhaps an OSM note might have been a better way to check it rather than just fiddling with the tag?
jgpacker (2015-05-17 01:27:39+00:00): it doesn't seem like a good idea to change shop=yes to shop=fixme
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-05-15 01:58:00+00:00): I already saw your proposal but I have no idea as to how Thessaloniki is 57: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:GR#Departments_and_self-governed_part. Attiki should use 00 instead of A1, otherwise there will be confusion with motorways.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:41+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
Monitor (2015-05-14 08:19:54+00:00): Обычно дворовые проезды рисуются тегами highway=service. Теги hw=residential в городской застройке ставится на стволовой проезд, на нем же тег name с названием улицы (на hw=service, name обычно не ставиться). В частном секторе hw=residential дорога вдоль жилых домов.
Supaplex (2015-05-14 03:34:51+00:00): 這種建築物裡主要是某個家店的，還是用封閉路徑標，比用單一節點好
Proms (2015-05-14 06:07:55+00:00): 這種建築物目前有其它商店，請問是否相關的手冊哪時用點，哪時用區塊呢?
Supaplex (2015-05-15 06:15:40+00:00): 目前想不出來有寫在那，要找找，都是慣例狀況。如果有建築物則畫建築，裡面主要的商家會加在建築物上，其他裡面可能有麥當勞這類比較小間的，則標點
Proms (2015-05-15 13:25:26+00:00): 既然是 "慣例"， 我怎麼會知道這樣的 "慣例" 呢? 而且這 "慣例" 是不是已成為規定了呢? 如不是規定，那我不能有我自己的 "慣例" 嗎?
GerdP (2015-10-19 15:12:14+00:00): please review:
what does highway=declared mean?
Did you mean highway=footway or highway=pedestrian?
Hjart (2015-05-14 08:31:17+00:00): Danske adresser bliver importeret og vedligeholdt fra det officielle adresseregister via en bot. Derfor anbefales det ikke at røre ved dem.
Drydd (2021-02-24 09:19:09+00:00): Der Fleischer ist nicht mehr.
Es ist jetzt Groschenmarkt drin.
Bitte ändern
malenki (2015-05-31 09:31:44+00:00): I'd like to point you to this note I just wrote:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/372566

Maybe you can enhance the data. :)
Hjart (2015-05-14 07:54:10+00:00): På almindelige villaveje som disse er det bedre at tagge selve bilvejen med sidewalk=right|left|both end at tegne separate fortove. Separate fortove ender generelt bare med at blive noget rod
Hjart (2015-05-14 12:13:30+00:00): Der er en cykelstivejledning her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning. Noget tilsvarende må også gælde for gangstier/fortove
ramyaragupathy (2015-05-14 12:40:38+00:00): Source is not http://ny.curbed.com/tags/court-street-lofts, but local knowledge
muralito (2015-05-14 13:41:02+00:00): Revertido. La escuela ya estaba mapeada.
muralito (2015-05-14 13:40:34+00:00): Revertido. No hay edificio entre las calles!!
eggie (2017-04-20 06:39:05+00:00): Alsnog welkom op osm

Wie na 2 jaar weer begint als  "herintreder" heeft zeker nog recht op een welkomstmail. Wellicht heb je wat steun aan de "links". 


Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SOSM (2015-05-16 13:42:11+00:00): The SchweizMobil map is -not- a legal source for OSM data, please do not use!
HealthCycler (2015-05-18 12:53:17+00:00): I have used the Schweiz Mobil map to verify my personal observations in order to double check my findings.
OSM does not regard the maps (http://map.veloland.ch/?lang=de&route=all) as legal source. In deed, this organisation does not create routes. However, they collect the data submitted by the various official cantonal authorities responsible for cycling paths. The federalistic system of Switzerland does not have a national authority.
Hence, it is worthwhile to double check observations with the Swiss Mobil maps.
datendelphin (2015-05-18 15:35:03+00:00): Hi healthyCycler. I think you misunderstood. Schweiz mobil does not allow OSM to use their data. This means you infringe their property if you use their website to map for OSM. But it is OK to map the cycling routes according to the guide posts. I hope this clears any confusion.
HealthCycler (2015-05-19 09:39:11+00:00): Hi datendelphin. Thank you for your clarification. Now I understand.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
DeBigC (2021-12-10 06:47:26+00:00): What is this building. I don't see "dorms" in the area you marked them. Has there been a demolition?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
literan (2016-02-17 08:52:03+00:00): кстати, а почему бы теги highway=construction не поставить на линию строящегося моста, пусть визуализируется? или есть какие-то соображения?
iWowik (2016-02-17 17:13:27+00:00): Просто 9 месяцев назад как было рано и кто-то был против, а теперь наверно уже можно
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
ramyaragupathy (2015-05-14 14:06:24+00:00): Source is not http://ny.curbed.com/tags/court-street-lofts, instead it is local knowledge
mavl (2015-05-14 16:41:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за проявленный к проекту OpenStreetMap интерес. Если хочется просто потренироваться, то лучше это делать в малонаселённых местах, а не в городах.

Ваши теги access=yes удалены, так как в данном случае они не имеют смысла.

Мы не ставим на все дороги access=yes и считаем, что доступ открыт, если не указано иное.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
kartler175 (2015-05-16 08:20:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5138976
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5138975
Relationen unvollständig! (via--member)
Ausserdem: Wie soll man jemals das Grundstück verlassen, wenn man weder rechts noch links abbiegen darf?
JanisJf (2015-05-16 14:57:59+00:00): ok
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
ramyaragupathy (2015-05-14 14:07:20+00:00): Source is not http://ny.curbed.com/tags/court-street-lofts, but local knowledge
Richard (2015-05-15 09:29:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What were you trying to do with this edit? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345001740 doesn't look like a new feature or anything else that's on the ground.
bazgal (2015-05-23 13:01:10+00:00): Dear mgru, some recent edits of yours in the "Parc de la Villette", Paris, France area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31135257) seem to be wrong, or look as if someone has been playing. Is it possible that you accidentally saved some test edits, or that someone else used your account? I would be glad if you could review the changes and correct or undo them. If you need help with that, contact me.
Regards,
bazgal
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:32:59+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 21:09:54+00:00): Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area.  The findings and the changes that will be made are described at 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy
RussNelson (2015-11-16 17:11:55+00:00): OSMAnd was trying to route me around this part of I-787. The Wiki says, about Key:construction:

For minor road-works (where the road in question remains open), use construction=minor (and don't use highway=construction, but leave it at its default value).
nfgusedautoparts (2015-11-16 18:44:08+00:00): i think that's new, i haven't looked at that page for a while.
martiensch (2015-10-04 12:44:35+00:00): Hallo Real Shadowman,

Jij had de nieuwe N201 bij Uithoorn van trunk naar primary omgezet. Ik vermoed dat jij dit gedaan hebt vanwege de maximumsnelheid van 80km/h.
Als ik jouw redenatie op deze autoweg doortrek, zou ik ook de A10-West naar primary mogen zetten, omdat je daar ' maar' 80 mag.

Tip: onze leidraad voor OSM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging

Groeten,

Martien
martiensch (2015-10-04 12:50:00+00:00): PS: de wijziging van de N196 naar secondary vind ik mooi!
Seandebasti (2018-06-09 20:25:04+00:00): Hey nadeem, for which purpose are this dots? osm is a database for correct POI, these dots has which meaning?
Seandebasti (2018-06-09 20:25:48+00:00): there are almost 2800 POI in islamabad
freebeer (2018-06-10 10:22:35+00:00): Just to note, the user's last changeset was in Jan of 2016, closer to this changeset than to today.
I don't feel like manually checking all 6918 `Point' nodes to see if any differ from the pattern of those I did check.  Should I prepare to revert and if so, how long should I wait?
I suspect if there is additional data for these points, it will be easier to upload afresh, if the user is still active.
user_599436 (2015-12-09 14:52:37+00:00): Hi nfgusedautoparts, do you know if construction has been completed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139632128 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-25 14:52:23+00:00): Something's gone wrong with merge at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25984639 I think - the name is currently showing as "Metropolitan;Metropolitan Line"
GerdP (2015-10-26 17:46:33+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
highway=stairs ist unüblich. Aus der Relation werde ich auch nicht schlau. Wie viele Treppen gibt es denn da ?
Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsteps
MichaH (2015-10-26 18:08:35+00:00): Schau auf meine OSM Wiki Seite, da siehst du Photos über die Treppenanlage die ich hier versucht habe in OSM abzubilden.
Das ganze war nach einer länglichen Diskussion über diese Bugnote und meine erste Änderung mit den Stufen als barrier=steps.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/326307