piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rickmastfan67 (2023-11-22 05:37:08+00:00): Or even maybe 'highway=trunk' + 'expressway=yes'?
Joseph R P (2023-11-22 16:11:59+00:00): I wouldn't really make a judgement on highways on OSM based on what the state considers them to be because how highways are classified by state is inconsistent with other states. Some maps have 2-lane controlled access roads shown as freeways while some show roads like Corridor Q as not. The allowance of bicycles or any low-speed vehicles to travel in the shoulders also shouldn't indicate the classification of road (unless there is something like a pair of bike lanes along it that frequently cross ramps) since what's allowed on freeways also varies by state, especially since some states let bikes in Interstates. It all comes down to whether the road is a controlled-access, high-speed, and divided highway. Corridor Q may not meet Interstate standards or even freeway standards in most if not all states, but it serves as such and doesn't really feature anything that many freeways don't have as many other freeways around the country have minor driveways or even sections to make U-turn.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 14:15:32+00:00): reverted
ovruni (2022-12-01 00:34:48+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios nuevamente se han agregado varios edificios superpuestos, algunos incluso tienen un layer ficticio [0], como si una casa estuviese sobre otra casa.
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118492529/history
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 00:36:33+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.

Nie jestem do końca przekonany czy permit jest tutaj poprawne:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118492812/history

Bardziej pasowałoby po prostu permissive ale nie jestem lokalny więc nie jestem na 100% pewien.

Definicja permit z wiki: "Access requires a permit, ordinarily granted" a np taki 40-latek permitu nie dostanie na korzystanie z tego miejsca.

Pozdrawiam!
MxxCon (2022-12-04 03:18:38+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580664
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:24:25+00:00): Jamaica Aveue is not closed to destination traffic at any time, and is not closed at all 10pm-6am.
MxxCon (2022-12-04 21:30:12+00:00): I don't understand you.🤔
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:32:39+00:00): It has been mistagged as access=no, which would mean that it is closed to cars, regardless of purpose, at all times.
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:34:39+00:00): Here is some context: https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/11/15/city-makes-jamaica-busways-permanent-but-with-shorter-hours-begins-northern-blvd-bus-lanes/
MxxCon (2022-12-04 21:37:42+00:00): https://www.geocoder.nyc/streetview.html?lnglat=-73.80783140659334,40.701764550575255
Yes, that's why it's been set to 
access=no; bus=yes; hgv =yes
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:40:29+00:00): You don't understand me. Cars are permitted on Jamaica Avenue at all times, so it is not access=no.
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:41:30+00:00): There are many bus-specific turn restrictions, is that what you're trying to show?
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:43:29+00:00): https://www.geocoder.nyc/streetview.html?lnglat=-73.80783140659334,40.701764550575255
MxxCon (2022-12-04 21:52:03+00:00): browser's URL doesn't update when you move the view, so I don't know what you are pointing at.
But I see what you mean regarding 6am-8pm
In that case it should be `access:conditional=no @ (06:00-20:00)` in addition to bus=yes; hgv =yes
Which means busses and trucks are allowed all the time, but cars are not allowed 6am-8pm
mdejean (2022-12-06 14:57:42+00:00): I will tag it the same as 14th Street (except 06:00-20:00 rather than 22:00) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5672434
MxxCon (2022-12-04 03:20:05+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? It looks you change a major road into a service road?!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580686
MxxCon (2022-12-04 03:36:13+00:00): I see what you tried to do here. However, please note that this way of tagging is outdated! Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice#Deprecated:_highway=service_for_busways
I see that you made similar changes in other places. Please correct your mistake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580686
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:27:52+00:00): This is a bus bypass, so does not meet the criteria for highway=busway. It also does not meet the criteria for highway=secondary since it is not of secondary importance to the highway network (since it only permits buses).
yasslay (2022-12-07 10:01:33+00:00): Hello!

I noticed this and a few other changesets changing the tagging of busways (not guided busways) to highway=service and it being reverted to tags such as highway=secondary.

I believe that the convention (from what I can understand) is to tag them as highway=service, access=no and bus=designated. If other types of vehicles, e.g. bicycles are permitted, then you would tag it as bicycle=yes.

I hope this helps with clearing anything up.

Kind regards,
yasslay
akadouri (2022-12-07 23:29:27+00:00): Why does this section not meet the criteria for highway=busway? It is a designated bus route protected from other lanes of traffic.

It may be a short segment, but that doesn't change what it is.
mdejean (2022-12-07 23:52:00+00:00): I would describe this as a pair of bus stops in a center-running painted bus lane (oops those bus stops should have been relocated), not as a very short section of bus way.
MxxCon (2022-12-04 03:20:30+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change this road designation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580870
mdejean (2022-12-04 21:38:41+00:00): This is a bus bay, which is correctly tagged as highway=service, not highway=tertiary.
ovruni (2022-12-01 01:04:01+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado nuevamente edificios superpuestos con layer ficticios. [0]
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118496482/history
TagaSanPedroAko (2023-04-02 23:03:18+00:00): 115 kV on a distribution line?
DP24PH (2023-04-04 01:35:07+00:00): I don't think so. It might mean NGCP/Meralco transmission line for 115kV+, and Meralco 13.8kV for the distribution line.


DP24
TagaSanPedroAko (2023-04-05 00:31:26+00:00): still no idea. The lines in question are carried on typical pole (13.5-16.5 m), so why you got them all tagged 115 kV? It's a terrible mistake.
DP24PH (2023-04-05 06:42:27+00:00): Will investigate this issue on Easter Sunday afternoon. My apologies for the confusion and mistake regarding the transmission/distribution lines.


DP24
Hufkratzer (2022-12-01 18:11:49+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118498813 hast du mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt (Preset "Reitanlage"). Sieht aber aus wie ein Reitplatz (Preset "Reitplatz", Tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Da du die Tags ansonsten - soweit ich gesehen habe - immer richtig verwendet hast, vermute ich eine versehentliche Verwechslung.
Edelsalami (2023-01-10 21:32:30+00:00): Hi Streetview247, darf ich dich bitten die Flächennutzung nicht an Wege/Straßen zu snappen - das ist in den meisten Fällen falsch, da ungenau. Das zurückzusetzen ist häufig sehr aufwendig. Danke.
JasonBob (2022-12-02 17:53:47+00:00): You have renamed this stretch of road from Niagara Ave to Ocean Beach Pier multiple times. Unless you can provide an official source, please stop the unecessary edits
3ngineer (2022-12-29 19:08:09+00:00): Hi, do you have a source for these track names, and VCC boundaries?
DennisTT (2022-12-31 05:51:36+00:00): Hi, they are from a photo of a chart I took when I was touring the OMC facility.
3ngineer (2022-12-31 05:56:52+00:00): Ah, thank you :)
3ngineer (2022-12-31 06:02:57+00:00): Are you able to verify the Substation name/location? direction reversal point? and that Storage Lane 7-12 does not exist?
DennisTT (2022-12-31 07:31:08+00:00): The substation building is located correctly and has the correct code DEZ.  The name I have on the diagram I'm looking at is just "Depot Substation".  It's not indicated on the diagram I'm looking at whether there's a generator.

Also I don't have the exact direction reversal points on the diagram to confirm.

And yes storage lanes 7-12 don't exist (at this time anyway).
3ngineer (2022-12-31 08:04:38+00:00): Oh, "Depot" matches the DEZ code better, I'll change that, thanks. I doubt there's a generator in the substation, but almost certain to be elsewhere for the control centre, same as Edmonds yard.
ovruni (2022-12-01 02:21:59+00:00): Hola chipana, el uso de la etiqueta de edificio esta destinada para edificios individuales, no para areas de los lotes. He revertido sus conjuntos de cambios
Saludos
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-12-01 07:38:29+00:00): Please fix the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2182325
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-12-01 07:41:44+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1343460
gscholz (2022-12-12 08:21:44+00:00): Hi Henblo
can you please respond here an fix those broken boundary relations?
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-20 08:03:49+00:00): Hi Henblo,
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset now to fix those issues.
Guido
Henblo (2022-12-20 23:57:19+00:00): Ya corregí los faltantes.
Glassman (2022-12-04 19:36:12+00:00): In OSM we typically don't map features that can not be verified such as this downwind paddle route. We do map ferry routes but only as a way of connecting locations for highway systems. I'm recommending that you remove this routes. You might want to check into OpenSeaMap, which uses OSM, to see what they recommend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129582151
ovruni (2022-12-01 02:35:35+00:00): Hola, le he escrito anteriormente sobre el uso de layer ficticios y en este conjunto nuevamente aparencen layer ficticios, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2022-12-01 02:38:50+00:00): Tambien revise la documentación sobre las directrices de ediciones organizadas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-02 12:45:22+00:00): Looks good, doesn't it?
Herman Lee (2022-12-02 15:06:21+00:00): 请问您能不能解释一下为什么在节点上引入奇怪的标签，谢谢
Herman Lee (2022-12-02 15:10:13+00:00): 本修改集已恢复
Ikuta (2022-12-02 16:07:22+00:00): 我用josm框選highway/streets/trunk 時不知道爲什麽也把節點選了進去，不好意思。
Herman Lee (2022-12-02 16:52:55+00:00): 没事没事，下次框选的时候可以加上一个type：way条件就可以只选择路径了
Ikuta (2022-12-03 01:22:41+00:00): 學到了，多謝！
lastcommodore (2022-12-01 23:08:15+00:00): Hey! Friendly reminder to double-check what you're importing.
You double-imported a great deal of buildings around eighth line that were already traced. I've reverted what I can in changeset 129622119, but for future and past commits please do double check to ensure you're not importing already existing info.
I'm not sure if this is the exact commit that created those double imports, but they were spread out across multiple of your changesets and I don't have them saved after I deleted the duplicates.
lastcommodore (2022-12-01 23:34:57+00:00): Also- just a follow up, I would heavily recommend you check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for future and past imports.

At the very least, Town of Milton is not a source added in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue and I would heavily recommend adding your data to it.
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-09 04:03:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129884059
nyampire (2022-12-01 06:22:10+00:00): OSMへようこそ！編集をレビューしました。
とてもよく描けていると思います。

航空写真は、場合によってはずれていることがあり、位置精度としては地理院地図の航空写真がわりと頼りになります。（逆に、撮影が古いことが多いです）
もし気になることが出てきたら、いくつか切り替えて見比べてみるなど、行ってみるとよいかな、と思います。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129585271
MxxCon (2022-12-04 03:58:10+00:00): Hello.
Could you please explain why did you put this node in Manhattan if its address is in Rhinebeck, NY?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129585299
nyampire (2022-12-01 06:22:48+00:00): OSMへようこそ！　編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けていると思います。
これからのマッピングを続けてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129585374
okadatsuneo (2022-12-01 10:57:42+00:00): 学生Mさん、こんにちは。
OpenStreetMapは建物や道路を書くものであって、youtubeへのリンクを書くものではありませんよ。
何を書きたいのでしょうか？
gscholz (2022-12-04 09:35:30+00:00): Hi Lucas,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of 8 regions like "Santa Inês", "Ubaíra", "Engenheiro Franca" etc.:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-40.15851&lat=-14.14703&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129587368

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-01 15:08:42+00:00): Why you created such network of ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956523771 where there is a simple square/parking?
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-02 12:43:33+00:00): Just a test?
pitfire (2022-12-01 13:31:20+00:00): Hallo Jule_Beuel,

Reinold-Hagen-Straße (35104454, v12)
Eine Abbiegespur ohne Gehweg (sidewalk=no) kann nicht gleichzeitig (foot=use_sidepath) haben. Das kann nicht passen!
Im Gegensatz zu bicycle=use_sidepath wurde dieses Tag nie richtig vorgeschlagen und akzeptiert. 
Zudem müssen Fußgänger nach StVO Gehwege benutzen (falls es sie gibt).
Eine Aufhebung der Benutzungpflicht erfolgt lediglich durch "traffic_sign=DE:259"

VG pitfire
user_177389 (2022-12-01 07:47:25+00:00): Hello,

please do not destroy any existing border relations, but correct them (or their course) instead of replacing them with closed rings. Otherwise you will damage more than your work is helpful.

Best Regards,
Mario
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 00:32:13+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.
Więc nie uważam że dobre jest aby name= oraz description= zawierał tą samą treść. Usunąłbym description.
Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 06:13:11+00:00): Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129766767
user_17505468 (2022-12-17 01:43:49+00:00): 复杂路口不要连接在同一个点上。参考的编辑方法

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions#Dual_carriageway_intersections
user_17505468 (2022-12-17 01:48:13+00:00): 另外可以参考红绿灯的编辑方法
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
marc__marc (2026-01-24 18:16:24+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10004727876/history/2
Quel est ta source pour l'ajout de capacity=3 ? tesla lui-même ne renseigne qu'une place.
est-ce qu'il y a d'autres chargeurs que tesla pour cet hotel ?
Cordialement,
Marc
yorados (2022-12-01 08:30:16+00:00): ja. Reicht aber, dass als Tag auf dem Highway selbst einzutragen.
highflyer74 (2022-12-02 06:14:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

In diesem Änderungssatz wurde (vermutlich unbeabsichtigt) Geometrie mehrere hundert Meter verschoben.

Auch Namensbezeichnungen wie "Gebäude" oder "Grundstück" entsprechen der Realität.
 
Ich muss deshalb deine Änderungen wieder zurücksetzen.

Sei so nett, dich eingehender mit der Funktionsweise von OSM zu beschäftigen, bevor du weiter editierst. Etwas Lesestoff dazu:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Danke!
highflyer74 (2022-12-02 06:14:42+00:00): *entsprechen nicht der Realität
Szymson (2022-12-03 21:43:00+00:00): Jakaś nowa linia?
abakus_uploader (2022-12-01 23:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 01:04:20+00:00): ^ corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129625090
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 01:05:41+00:00): Hello, I removed the name:en key from the recently updated objects. It doesn't look like this name originates from the English language. Cheers!
Max-Kritic (2022-12-01 16:34:43+00:00): J'ai fait un revers. Cela doit être bon..
Marek-M (2022-12-01 18:41:07+00:00): Hi, instead of changed road definition why did you updated this lamp with height=0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724921627 ? Is that correct edit?
opendcc (2022-12-01 10:29:48+00:00): Hallo,

wenn Du da nachgesehen hast: kannst Du Dich errinnern, ob der Straße stimmt: Am Nemerberg / am Nemerfeld?
thetornado76 (2022-12-01 11:06:52+00:00): Hallo,
das kann ich leider nicht genau beantworten, da habe ich damals nicht drauf geachtet. Jedoch kann man zumindest hier https://storage13.openstreetcam.org/files/photo/2021/8/9/proc/3775973_b6c03_6111ac65a7ac7.jpg erkennen dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152782720 "Am Nemerberg" heißt. Ein weiteres Straßenschild konnte ich nicht erkennen auf den Bildern.
Mal gerade beim Bayern Atlas geschaut, der kennt auch nur "Am Nemerberg"
muralito (2022-12-01 14:11:07+00:00): Hi. This is not the suggested way to map a park. The highway=residential models the center of the street, and the leisure=park should be drawed in the perimeter of the park.
Rider_gang (2022-12-02 09:41:14+00:00): Hi muralito, 
I have created a separate polygon and added the tags to it. Thank you for your valuable input.
drkt (2022-12-02 21:36:29+00:00): Det er meget svært at få et overblik over et område med disse changeset comments. Er det muligt at du kunne beskrive dine changesets, endda bare vagt?
Tak
antonr (2022-12-04 20:52:49+00:00): Det ville jeg også sætte pris på :-) Der er helt fin vejledning her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
kortgodt (2022-12-04 21:30:42+00:00): Stier og krematorie
olo81 (2022-12-28 16:58:04+00:00): Nazwa opisowa, do poprawy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 10:18:42+00:00): Hej! Behövs trottoar bredvid gatan när vi har taggat vägen med sidewalk?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#:~:text=In%20the%20UK%2C%20the%20legal%20term%20for%20a,carriageway%20%28which%20there%2C%20incidentally%20is%20known%20as%20roadway.%29
archie (2022-12-01 10:49:59+00:00): Japp. Annars hade jag inte ritat in den. Jobbigt PostNord att få det rätt inte sant? Ser dig omkring på andra ställen. Dessutom är detta åter ett försök från PostNord att tweaka med openstreetmap. Gångvägen mynnar inte ut i gatan utan i trottoaren. Kolla på platsen!
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 10:56:28+00:00): Jag kanske missförstår dig men då menar du enligt samma resonemang att stigen mellan Wilhelm Thams väg och Rönngatan också är felaktig?
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 10:58:04+00:00): Och jag försöker inte tweaka någonting. Vill bara att det ska bli så korrekt som möjligt i OSM..
archie (2022-12-01 11:06:35+00:00): Jag är mycket förvånad över din fråga. När du ifrågasätter trottoaren som jag har ritat in, fastän den finns på plats och du  undersöker möjligheten att slippa rita in den. Mycket märkligt.
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:15:37+00:00): Enligt wiki så ska taggen "sidewalk" vara tillräcklig på denna typ av väg. Dessutom har vägen du ritat skapat ett "problem" i OSM.
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:18:08+00:00): Enligt OSM:
Alla vägar, stigar och färjelinjer bör vara sammankopplade för att skapa ett sammanhållet vägnät. Detta objekt (eller liten samling av objekt) är antingen ej sammankopplade med ruttnätverket eller enbart sammankopplat via ett objekt som få applikationer anser kunna ingå i en rutt.
archie (2022-12-01 11:25:22+00:00): Ja, det är bara att förlänga trottoaren till närmaste övergångsställe. Jag hjälpte bara till eftersom PostNord har svårt att förstå. Att koppla ihop gångvägarna från fastigheterna  till fel väg, dvs bilvägen, rakt ut,  menar du inte på allvar? Rita som det är i verkligheten. I verkligheten mynnar gångvägarna ut i trottoaren inte i bilvägen. Är det så svårt att förstå? Att jag ritat in trottoaren mellan gångvägarna var bara en vänlig gest från mig för att visa. Det här är grundläggande. Du försöker att tweaka genom att koppla gångvägarna till bilvägen istället för till trottoaren.
archie (2022-12-01 11:28:18+00:00): Jag kan ta bort trottoaren om det är så att du själv vill rita in den ...
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:33:27+00:00): Det är jättesnällt att du hjälper till.
Du menar alltså att sidewalk taggen inte är tillräcklig trots andra uppgifter i wiki?
Tittar vi på stigen som jag frågade om ovan så är den ritad enligt samma princip - stigen går rakt ut i "bilvägen". Jag skriver "bilvägen" eftersom den har trottoartaggar..

Säger du att alla trottoarer / stigar mm är felaktiga om de är kopplade direkt mot en väg?
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:34:52+00:00): (och försöker återigen inte tweaka, jag vill koppla vägarna på ett korrekt sätt - och vad jag förstått så ska sidewalktaggen vara tillräcklig här)
archie (2022-12-01 11:41:56+00:00): Du försöker att hitta argument för att kunna tweka. Gångvägarna går ut till trottoaren. Rita så som det är i verkligheten. Det är så vi gör i osm.
archie (2022-12-01 11:48:55+00:00): Om du har svårt att skilja mellan trottoarens gångbana och bilvägen (helt makalöst för en PostNord medarbetare) så kan jag tipsa om att avgränsningen i det här fallet är gråa kantsten.
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:51:38+00:00): I verkligheten så har vägen trottoar på båda sidorna (sidewalk=both).
Sedan är trottoarer, stigar mm kopplade mot trottoaren.

Vad är det som inte är verkligt?

Jag försöker inte hitta argument för att tweaka. 
Jag har kommit med källhänvisning till wiki som stödjer det jag skriver.
MarcusMedC-PostNord (2022-12-01 11:53:37+00:00): Skrev lite fel, menar att gångvägar är kopplade mot trottoaren :)
archie (2022-12-01 11:54:41+00:00): Rita som det ser ut i verkligheten inte som du önskar att den vore. Det är den grundläggande principen i osm, som du uppenbart inte omfamnar. 
https://www.google.com/maps/@57.7811675,14.2704273,3a,75y,39.97h,67.82t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGVXAw3uLnr_PwWfSJxvVEQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DGVXAw3uLnr_PwWfSJxvVEQ%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D51.45768%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
archie (2022-12-01 12:05:08+00:00): På något sätt måste det - rent intellektuellt - ha gått upp för dig vid det här laget att sidewalk-taggen på bilvägen endast tjänar som information om att trottoar finns. Nu när du så förtjänstfullt har fört in denna information så måste du fullborda verket och rita in själva trottoaren på de sidor du angett, allt i enlighet med verkligheten på platsen.