piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2020-09-07 01:39:52+00:00): Hola, he notado que en esta edición se han modificado nombres de calles, en algunos casos se ha retirado el prefijo que tenían como "Jirón" y en otros se los ha cambiado por abreviaciones como "Jr.", lo cual esta desaconsejado. [0] Por favor evitar usar abreviaciones y en caso de que algo tenga un prefijo no abreviarlos.
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
dzidek23 (2020-09-07 15:40:28+00:00): Czesc,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4475469216 czy to w koncu jest Biedronka czy nie. Usunales kilka znacznikow, kilka zostalo jak (email i nazwa po rusku), nie mozliwe zeby to byla biedronka tylko dla rosjan :)
ovruni (2020-09-07 02:27:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en esta edición se han eliminado varios objetos que pueden visualizarse desde las imágenes aéreas, ademas el texto en su conjunto de cambios solamente dice "reciente". Por esta razón he revertido parcialmente este conjunto de cambios. Por favor ingrese un texto en su conjunto de cambios [0] que permita entender esta edición.
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
ZeLonewolf (2020-09-11 03:43:45+00:00): Hi, please be aware that this change deleted most of the boundary of Forestburgh.  You should be running the validator in JOSM which will tell you if you've broken a boundary relation.  Feel free to hit me up on Slack if you need any ore details.  I've managed to revert part of this changeset to fix it but please be aware of this issue on other edits!
ovruni (2020-09-07 03:32:31+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. Los conjuntos de cambios de cambios con el texto "ME PARECE GENIAL" no indican sobre que han consistido los cambios realizados, por favor ingrese textos que permitan a otros miembros de la comunidad en que consistieron sus modificaciones, tal como se encuentra descrito en la sección de buenos conjuntos de cambios [0].
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Zalitoar (2020-09-07 04:42:30+00:00): Hola camilaazm! Felicitaciones por tu primera edición. La etiqueta "landuse" se usa principalmente para áreas grandes y no en grupos de pequeñas parcelas segmentadas. Para mejorar lo que editaste y ajustarlo podés consultar el artículo en la Wiki OSM donde se explica mejor su uso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse=residential
Cualquier duda la podés transmitir al resto la comunidad argentina por cualquiera de los canales sugeridos en el editor web iD (aparecen al guardar una edición)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:58+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7882649974/history
b-jazz (2021-01-05 23:23:37+00:00): Something happened with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844912860 recently, but I'm not sure how it should look. Maybe you could help fix it up? Thanks.
user_8466505 (2021-01-09 00:24:01+00:00): Hello b-jazz,
Thank you for the report! I will look into the error, and get back to you with progress.
skibum77 (2020-09-07 04:25:33+00:00): Edit - it was built but removed around 2012.
Stalker61 (2020-09-07 15:49:22+00:00): Do not touch anything here, never. Your hands are growing out of the wrong place
Colonsay (2020-09-09 19:44:28+00:00): Hi Stalker61, I saw your reverted changeset and re-examined the changes I made here. Thanks for fixing, I appreciate the feedback.
ovruni (2020-09-07 04:51:10+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM.
Los conjuntos de cambios de cambios con textos como ":/" no indican sobre que han consistido los cambios realizados, por favor ingrese textos que permitan a otros miembros de la comunidad en que consistieron sus modificaciones, tal como se encuentra descrito en la sección de buenos conjuntos de cambios [0].
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:27:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90502256
user_10215874 (2020-09-11 07:45:07+00:00): I've added a lot of shops/POI in Tesco Lotus
but i forgot to upload the data then i go to extend the drain node and it got that name
Warin61 (2021-05-22 03:24:09+00:00): Hi,
For some of this you have sport=basketball, it is actually sport=netball. I have corrected 2 courts.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:57:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90504379
Peter Elderson (2020-09-09 19:57:37+00:00): Ha Dick, Ik snap dat je het zo doet maar er staat echt geen knooppunt x daar! Ik denk dat vmarc zo'n lus wel gaat ondersteunen na de release van versie 3, het komt immers wel vaker voor. IK denk zelfs dat als de fietsrotonde indersteund wordt,  dit vanzelf ook goed gaat.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-07 08:48:45+00:00): No, this is not correct. Reverted.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-07 08:49:47+00:00): This is also not correct. Reverted.
eggie (2020-09-07 07:01:52+00:00): Hi Kartenmacher,
Thanks for  your contribution. I merged the info with the present addressnode.
Gr eggie
LeifRasmussen (2020-09-07 14:23:45+00:00): Hmm... usually access=private is only used to mark that it's private access, not private ownership.  If there are no trespassing signs, or the general public is not allowed to use a road, add access=private.  Otherwise, I'd avoid the tag.  Maybe try ownership=private?
user_2066394 (2020-09-07 08:47:27+00:00): Hier mal prüfen, ob die hinzugefügten Attribute alle notwendig/beabsichtigt sind.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90508131

Analog bei den anderen Changesets
tofrenz (2020-09-07 12:43:28+00:00): Ich habe diese absichtlich hinzugefügt um den Weg so gut wie möglich zu beschreiben. Ich habe vor das gleiche auch für alle anderen Wege in diesem Wohngebiet zu tun.
Ich kenne mich vor Ort sehr gut aus.
Parzelle13 (2020-09-07 15:30:56+00:00): @tofrenz: Katzen, Hühner, Gänse. Ziegen , Schafe usw. fehlen leider noch, dann wäre es komplett.
tofrenz (2020-09-07 16:06:11+00:00): na dann lösche bitte den Edit und ich werde nicht weiter machen
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-07 07:15:06+00:00): Hi tofrenz, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several paths to the house entrances? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
tofrenz (2020-09-07 12:46:02+00:00): All deleted ways are just entrances and no actual ways. Those entrances are all private property.
Either all entrances in the whole city are taped or this view are deleted.
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-07 12:47:06+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way!
tofrenz (2020-09-07 12:51:55+00:00): This are no real ways. They are like path on private property. There is no benefit for any map to hold this information.
freebeer (2020-09-14 03:02:32+00:00): these paths were correctly mapped as private by the firm which added them to osm as useful to their business model of to-the-door delivery, much like amazon is doing today with service drives.

osm is not a map but a database of objects that exist in the real world.  just because something in on private property does not mean it is not of value to a business that has need to approach and measure the distance to the entrance, to say nothing of welcome visitors and emergency responders..

if you do not want to see them on the map, it is quite simple not to render something with access=private, as seen in the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399835848/history for example.
gileri (2020-09-07 07:30:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Par défaut les vélos sont autorisés sur ce type de voies, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter bicycle=yes :)
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-07 07:15:37+00:00): Hi tofrenz, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
tofrenz (2020-09-07 12:47:55+00:00): I corrected the field, because it was too big.
VA00 (2020-09-07 18:53:42+00:00): Ale czy ta droga faktycznie istnieje?
Adam_Piszczek (2020-09-07 23:16:48+00:00): Dodajesz że drogi nie widać,dodałem według Binga,skasowałem wcześniej.
VA00 (2020-09-08 05:42:49+00:00): To jest ta droga czy jej nie ma? Jechałeś nią?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:32:43+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, non-existent items were removed, such as the node with the name=Golf
JezCrow (2020-09-07 22:27:05+00:00): Hi mathpras,
access=costumers is a strange way to describe people driving through this Covid19 test site! (not sure what the correct tag should be given that you have to pre-book your appointment)
Happy mapping,
Jez
mathpras (2020-09-08 06:19:12+00:00): Hi there, Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the customers tag based on the type of building it is leading to. Thanks for your valuable feedback. I am changing the access to private based on the community suggestion. Please find the changeset(90563171) for the suggested modifications. Let me know in case of any more modifications required. Always happy to learn from the community
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 10:09:20+00:00): You requested a review of this work. It looks like the junction of 294 and ศก.5089 has some serious problems. One segment of  294 (way id:844947605) has 16 redundant U-turn restrictions.

The rest of the junction looks okay but if I were being asked to fix it,my first step would be to delete all of the existing U-Turn restrictions and start over.

It's hard for me to tell which of those restrictions you're responsible for but clearly it needs to be fixed. 

Dave
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 10:14:44+00:00): You requested a review of this changeset. Actually my original comment belongs on a different changeset. I didn't see anything wrong with the oneway situation here so I'll give you a "pass" on that.

Dave
❤️‍🔥 (2020-09-09 09:38:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for the contribution! If cycleways are not physically separated from the car lanes, the convention is to add a tag to the existing road instead of drawing the cycle lane separately. In this case, you could just add cycleway:left=lane to Domain Drive. Here's an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29849581
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 10:15:55+00:00): You requested a review of this work. It looks like the junction of 294 and ศก.5089 has some serious problems. One segment of 294 (way id:844947605) has 16 redundant U-turn restrictions.

The rest of the junction looks okay but if I were being asked to fix it,my first step would be to delete all of the existing U-Turn restrictions and start over.

It's hard for me to tell which of those restrictions you're responsible for but clearly it needs to be fixed.

Dave
VitalieS (2020-09-25 22:00:11+00:00): building:part=* areas should be always within a separate building=* area representing the entire building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90512365
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-26 05:06:26+00:00): In addition to the different ways tagged building:part=yes, there should be one area (closed way or multipolygon) marking the outline of the whole building, tagged with building=*.
VitalieS (2020-09-25 22:00:04+00:00): building:part=* areas should be always within a separate building=* area representing the entire building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90512689
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-26 05:08:08+00:00): In addition to the different ways tagged building:part=yes, there should be one area (closed way or multipolygon) marking the outline of the whole building, tagged with building=*.
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-26 05:08:32+00:00): In addition to the different ways tagged building:part=yes, there should be one area (closed way or multipolygon) marking the outline of the whole building, tagged with building=*.
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:35:39+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tordans (2020-09-07 15:16:14+00:00): Danke :)
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-07 11:13:09+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90526535
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-07 11:13:46+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data
#vandalism
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Sam Wilson (2020-09-07 08:31:01+00:00): @OKMG_SUPPORT I tweaked the formatting for opening_hours; see https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool for a useful tool for these.
stephankn (2020-11-15 22:22:27+00:00): you have created a park here with a single node. This looks wrong. The name suggests you maybe wanted to add a flower shop (florist). Is this correct? If so, please change the tag from "leisure=park" into shop=florist
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:57:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90516089
Kaarti_B (2020-12-30 21:02:39+00:00): Curious why building way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817791495 was deleted, seems like it was a legitimate building.
vittoria pauri (2020-12-30 21:12:16+00:00): @Kaarti_B I'm sorry, I cannot see what building you are referring to! Having edited it more than 4 months ago, I can't really tell why, because I do not remember. Might be my fault btw!
andergrin (2020-09-07 18:53:01+00:00): Добрий день. Згідно законодавства, назві не може міститись слово "ціна", тому всі вивіски на аптеках мають в кінці просто "ц".
Asumarin (2020-09-08 06:48:58+00:00): привет! можно попросить документацию с этим правилом?
Asumarin (2020-09-08 06:49:29+00:00): вітання! можна попросити документацію з цим правилом?
andergrin (2020-09-08 07:10:53+00:00): http://www.amc.gov.ua/amku/doccatalog/document?id=90828&schema=kyivr
Asumarin (2020-09-08 07:43:03+00:00): спасибі! ми поправимо наші дані найближчим часом
eggie (2020-09-07 10:29:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
A67-A67 (2020-09-08 22:44:56+00:00): Hallo emvee,
Je hebt hier turn:lanes=through|right| verandert in turn:lanes=right|through| 

De oorspronkelijke tagging was correct. Hier bevindt zich een rechtdoor-voorsorteervak op de linkerstrook, een rechtsaf-voorsorteervak op de middenstrook en een busstrook zonder pijl op de rechterstrook.
emvee (2020-09-09 06:47:19+00:00): Bedankt voor je oplettendheid, ja niet goed gedaan. Heb de fout verbeterd.

De Osmose warning klopt dus niet, ik zal eens kijken of ik daar follow-up aan kan geven.
A67-A67 (2020-09-12 12:13:49+00:00): Geen probleem. Fijn dat het weer klopt.
user_5359 (2020-12-28 18:38:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/90274588/history. The street wasn't visible because you use addr:street=residential instead highway=residential.
AndreasTUHU (2024-10-03 06:32:09+00:00): Szia,
Nemrég jártam errefelé és úgy láttam, hogy a Kádár-villa helyén nincs semmilyen épület vagy rom. 

Viszont a 46.99164, 18.1679185 koordinátán még áll egy épület ami az alábbi cikkben szereplő képek alapján, a Kádár villa lehet (IV.)
Ha nincs ellenvetésed, a IV.sz. villát visszaállítanám törölt állapotábaól és a jelenlegi Kádár villát törölném.
Üdv, András
AndreasTUHU (2024-10-03 08:16:09+00:00): https://amultemlekei.hu/kadar-villa-balatonvilagos/
Bálint (2024-10-03 12:04:25+00:00): Szia, rendben, most így fejből nem emlékszem már pontosan hogy volt, de ha nemrég jártál ott, akkor nyugodtan korrigáld.
AndreasTUHU (2024-10-08 08:21:25+00:00): Javítottam, köszönöm a visszajelzést.
zuicz (2021-05-02 11:41:58+00:00): Jest jeszcze remont?
Olga | Yanosik (2021-05-04 09:35:30+00:00): Remont nadal trwa wg śladów GPS, data skorygowana
laurent-38 (2020-09-10 07:41:39+00:00): Bonjour,

 il n’y a pas de voie verte à cet endroit. Seule la rue voisine (rue du Trianon) est dotée d’un aménagement cyclable (sens unique avec voie cyclable à contresens).

J’ai apporté les corrections nécessaires dans le groupe de modifications https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90684155.

Voir aussi la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2338441
simon_geovelo (2020-09-10 08:56:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci beaucoup pour les corrections.
J'avais effectivement mal interprété ce signalement.

Simon de Geovelo
woodpeck (2020-09-08 12:03:11+00:00): Dear Green Mountain, please start providing changeset comments when you upload data to OSM. See here for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments -- Thank you, Frederik Ramm for the OSM DWG
damianeue (2020-09-07 13:56:06+00:00): I don't understand what you changed
SekeRob (2020-09-07 17:10:38+00:00): Me neither. Undone the road sections merge with the bridge.
The lining on that road after the resurfacing with fresh asphalt is crazy. When turning onto it it looks like 3 lanes ATM, that's why I noted the purpose unknown. A painted bi-directional cycle track? They're clueless in Pescara as how to design safe and logical organized cycle tracks, let alone crossings.
damianeue (2020-09-07 17:18:03+00:00): I know, I live close to the street and it's a nightmare everytime I pass there.
SekeRob (2020-09-07 17:27:37+00:00): I come from a small 50,000 citizen town. The immediate area of about 10 x 17 kilometers has over 750 km of cycle track. What you see here is of permanent bafflement, to include the painted path along SS5 and Viale Vittorio Em.II not to speak of cycle tracks where you have signs such as at the airport and along the lungomare at Francavilla with max. speed 10km. Sometimes I have the feeling car drivers just don't register at all you're there. The safest to cycle is out in the countryside. They are very courteous, there, but else "sempre in fretta".
Take care and thx for pointing me to me slip of the edit board.
eggie (2020-09-07 10:37:14+00:00): Dag Kuiper.. Je vraag om een review.. Normaliter staat zo'n gebouw in de BAG (Kadaster) en kan het middels een verzoek op het forum van osm geïmporteerd worden
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen bij het Kadaster en vragen waarom het pand niet bekend is bij het Kadaster. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Weerseloseweg%20358&resultOffset=0&objectId=0153100000249460&geometry.x=256723.97245192&geometry.y=476260.07999851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0153010000363113

Voorlopig staat het in ieder geval in OSM. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-07 10:46:51+00:00): typo.. Je vraagt... Ben sneller dan mijn toetsenbord. Doe je zelf een terugmelding bij het kadaster?
Gr Eggie
Kuiperonline (2020-09-07 14:05:06+00:00): Beste Eggie, Het zijn woonwagens, die komen niet bij het kadaster in beeld neem ik aan. Ook niet wanneer ze permanent staan.
eggie (2020-09-07 14:30:06+00:00): Dat verschilt van Kadaster tot Kadaster. In Dordrecht worden zelfs tijdelijke woonwagens opgenomen die naast een woning in aanbouw staan. Idem woonwagenkampjes. 
Bij sommige kadasters zijn ze weer gestopt met de huisjesparken. Je kunt er niet van op aan.
Zou het maar zo laten..
Mvg
Eggie
SimonPoole (2020-09-08 08:35:19+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Edit scheint vieles kaputt gegangen zu sein, so hast du z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148773303 in ein highway=residential geändert, aber es hat auch ein paar andere Merkwürdigkeiten.

Ich hab mal als Notmassnahme die Änderungen an way 148773303 rückgängig gemacht, kannst du aber den Rest bitte auch überprüfen.
SimonPoole (2020-09-08 08:56:44+00:00): Sorry, du warst es nicht, sondern die Edits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89929447 leider musste ich dein Changeset deshalb völlig revertieren, da die Änderungen an kaputten Daten waren. Ich versuche mal nachher, das was brauchbar ist wieder herzustellen.
SimonPoole (2020-09-08 09:11:21+00:00): So die Umzäumung, Tore und Parkplatz in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90574966 wieder hinzugrfügt, du hast noch was an der Villa geändert, dass müsstest du nochmals anschauen.
Meskalin (2020-09-09 10:26:23+00:00): hi Simon,
Danke für die Info. Hatte das Chaos auch schon bemerkt und gehofft das es wohl nur eine "offene Baustelle" ist.
Der Autor hat ja praktisch noch keine Edits, daher wohl ein Anfängerfehler.
Schöne Grüße und vielen Dank!
abakus_uploader (2020-09-07 22:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
jimmyhendrix (2020-09-07 11:27:49+00:00): Hallo,
der Optiker Ermeding ist vor kurzem von der Albertusstraße weggezogen; allerdings zur Bismarckstraße 39-41, nicht 24. Siehe auch die Webseite des Unternehmens http://www.sehgenuss.de/
Viele Grüße