piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
willkmis (2022-09-26 06:13:46+00:00): Hi, I was the one who changed your previous address entry. In OpenStreetMap, only the street name goes in addr:street. Things like a suite number goes in addr:unit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:addr:*&uselang=en#Detailed_subkeys
Allison P (2022-09-26 21:41:57+00:00): I think it's more correct to have addr:unit just be 201. I don't believe it's typical to use a # or the unit prefix.
Allison P (2022-09-26 21:42:31+00:00): Also, year should probably be start_date
JessAk71 (2022-09-30 19:57:43+00:00): Hi pabi12, this changeset as well as a lot of your others in this area I see that you are merging node pois with buildings but in most of the cases I see, the buildings do not only contain the poi, rather the buildings have apartments in the upper floors etc so its best to leave the poi as a node instead of merging it with the building since the building contains more than just the one poi - also the building is not named after the poi... I have made the correction on the map but please in future edits note this important distinction to avoid these types of edits. If the poi inside a building is not the entire building then leave the poi as a node outside of the building itself.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
moje_konto (2022-12-27 17:58:03+00:00): tracktype=grade1 to "droga trwale utwardzona – nawierzchnia asfaltowa, betonowa, płyty betonowe".

Znacznik został dodany do surface=dirt, czyli sprzeczność.

Skoro było sprawdzone na miejscu i znany jest faktyczny typ nawierzchni, to warto poprawić.

Albo trzeba zmienić tracktype na gorsze albo surface na lepsze.
JessAk71 (2022-09-30 20:03:09+00:00): Hi pabi12, this is another case where the entire building is not the poi so its best to place the poi in a node instead and leave the building as is since there are apartments in the floors above the restaurant. I have fixed this case on the map for you.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-26 09:18:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes. (you collected in 1 case >15 buildings and tagged this as 1 building)



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126635729
limes11 (2022-09-26 20:55:36+00:00): Hi, 

sind die Wegen denn auch wieder frei? Da sind noch access=no's drauf.

VG, Limes
HBR (2022-09-27 10:35:47+00:00): Wir haben mit am Wochende die Brücke mit 2 THW Fachgruppen Brückenbau die Brücke aufgebaut und am Sonntag 25.9. eingehoben.

Stand: 25.9. noch 2m Erde auf beiden Ahrseiten aufzuschützen um die Brücke benutzen zu können. 

Den genauen Freigabetermin für die Brücke wurde mir gestern nicht genannt.
limes11 (2022-09-27 11:02:25+00:00): Ok, danke. Dann lassen wir das erstmal auf access=no stehen. Viele Grüße!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
TagaSanPedroAko (2023-12-07 18:27:59+00:00): just a note, Bing airphoto around the area is badly offset with GPX tracks. I restored the previous road alignment for part of Aguinaldo Highway and Anabu Road based on Esri coverage which is better aligned with GPX.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
oba510 (2022-09-26 08:02:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is this part of an assignment for GEOG 80 by any chance?  There have been a number of very similar edits in the last few days around the campus adding random paths and things that have already been mapped on top of existing objects.  

Unfortunately I had to revert this changeset because it was mostly duplicating things that were already mapped, and had at least one dragged node.
Arminus (2022-09-26 08:45:27+00:00): Am Gipfel splitten und den Weg im Wald auf abandoned?
biker-2 (2022-09-27 05:33:45+00:00): bin den Weg vorgestern gegangen weil mein Navi mich da lang routete, der ist offensichtlich nicht mehr in Betrieb, insb runter richtung rißbach war es mehr offroad als pfad, aber es waren eben noch ganz rudimentäre reste ab und zu zu sehen. ich finde das teilweise sogar ein nachteil an OSM, dass jeder noch so miese pfad drin ist, der mangels kategorie nicht immer sofort als solcher zu erkennen ist. den weg komplett löschen oder abandoned zu setzen, finde ich auch nicht ganz richtig.  man könnte tatsächlich zumindest den oberen teil bis zum gipfel gindelalmschneid auf abandoned setzen, dort ist gar nichts zu erkennen, an der waldgrenze ist ein zaun zu überqueren, erst dann findet man mit suchen den pfad
Arminus (2022-09-27 07:05:56+00:00): naja, wenn ich mir die history hier ansehe, außer good und excellent hatte der way in den letzten 2 Jahren Alles, das sagt schon viel aus...

Und nein, für löschen bin ich nicht, dann wir er spätestens nächstes Frühjahr von unten her wieder gemappt. Aber Dein "aufgegeben und wird nicht mehr unterhalten" deutet m.e. klar auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:abandoned:*
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Hb- (2023-01-06 20:24:35+00:00): Ist denn dieser Fußweg jetzt wieder frei? Planmäßig soll er das bereits im November gewesen sein. https://www.news38.de/braunschweig/article300004224/braunschweig-hauptbahnhof-suedausgang-bauarbeiten-deutsche-bahn-siemens-news.html
BSVG_nf (2023-01-16 05:29:30+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis die Baustelle wurde verlängert bis zum 06.12. die Freigabe ist an mir vorbei gegangen ist geändert.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-09-26 06:47:38+00:00): Kender du ikke navnet på tandlægen og frisøren? Navnet er vigtigt ifm søgning.
LySioS (2022-09-27 20:23:00+00:00): Thank you ! & Welcome
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126638220
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 06:28:51+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=41.036214%2C-77.217548%2C17.60
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Herman Lee (2022-09-27 01:21:02+00:00): 请使用简体中文作为name的标签，谢谢
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 06:41:53+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=8.480877%2C4.541007%2C17.96
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126639092
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 06:41:17+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=8.481610%2C4.579056%2C14.35
Dino Michelini (2022-09-29 16:08:17+00:00): Ciao, vorrei sapere perchè hai cancellato il basolato romano della Via Clodia (1029595542, v4) uno dei pochi rimasti e sopravvisuti. Grazie
klaus e werner (2022-09-29 18:11:30+00:00): Scusami, magari avrei dovuto essere piu' cauto!
L'ho trovato come poligono invece di multiline - percio' l'ho cambiato mantenendo i tag.
Come vogliamo procedere? Vuoi mettere mano te (e io capisco che cosa ho tolto caso mai)?
user_5359 (2022-09-27 08:45:24+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/node/10052961514. What is the meaning of the tag 20 = Rue du Canal de Luenaz ?
thepriben (2022-09-27 09:18:06+00:00): Hi,
Thank you to have detected this issue. Actually it supposed to be an address. I just fixed it https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10052961514

Regards, B.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 06:58:57+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=8.491390%2C4.570777%2C14.84
Mordechai23 (2022-10-03 15:13:37+00:00): Usunąłeś z obrysu budynku jego istniejące fragmenty jak np https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101140846/history
I potworzyłeś fikcyjne, dublujące się budynki w środku
Bąbel (2022-10-04 09:37:39+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.1084233&lon=17.0401606&zoom=19
Tu podgląd w 3d - aby to zobaczyć po co. rysunek techniczny i tagowanie. A wejście od ośrodka zdrowia 'podcień', obróć i zobacz.  TO POD TAGOWANIE WYSOKOŚCIAMI. Więcej nie tłumaczę.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-26 12:55:35+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś layer=-1? brama jest pod ulicą
Bąbel (2022-09-26 17:53:15+00:00): dla sprawdzenia widoku3D, -1 zamieniłem na location + cegła. niestety bez efektu! przywracam. zostaje widok 2D - mapa papierowa.
eggie (2022-09-26 08:30:39+00:00): Dag Teepe.. Tip... Editor iD is nu niet echt geschikt om routerelaties te bewerken.
Bij knippen gaan andere relaties stuk.
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 MVG
eggie
Herman Lee (2022-09-27 01:19:57+00:00): 请使用简体中文作为name的标签，谢谢
taihoku (2022-09-27 01:27:21+00:00): 請自行更改
Herman Lee (2022-09-27 01:40:08+00:00): 不过，繁体中文可以加在name:zh-Hant 标签里，可以考虑一下
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 07:12:59+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=8.479134%2C4.535576%2C14.42
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126640163
vasony (2022-10-03 15:29:47+00:00): Hello!

Mi a forrása az átnevezésnek, helyszínen nem látszik ebből semmi.

Tamás
r_oyal (2022-10-04 06:38:48+00:00): Kedves Tamás!

Az alábbi cikkben írnak róla:
https://esztergom.hu/esztergomi/hirek/hir/812-beszamolo-a-2022-08-25-napjan-megtartott-rendkivuli-kepviselo-testuleti-uleserol

Sajnálatos, hogy a valóságban még nem látunk semmit belőle, mert az önkormányzatnak kötelessége X időn belül kihelyezni az utcanévtáblát. (Talán 60 nap áll rendelkezésükre, de ez a helyi rendeletből kiderül).
vasony (2022-10-04 11:14:14+00:00): Kedves r_oyal!

Köszönöm. nem csodálkozom, Budapesten is volt hogy 9 hónap telt el mire ünnepélyesen felavatták az új táblát, valószínű akkor ért rá a káder.

Hasznos lenne legközelebb a forrásnál vagy akár a szövegnél megadni a linket amikor a szerkesztés lezárásra kerül.
Ezek a mezők fontosak és minden szerkesztőnek támpont.

Köszi, Tamás
r_oyal (2022-10-04 12:14:12+00:00): Kedves Tamás!

Rendben, igyekszem legközelebb feltüntetni a forrást/hivatkozást.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 07:18:56+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=8.487318%2C4.562087%2C17.13
redd (2022-09-26 09:29:37+00:00): Danke fürs Lösen meines Hinweises (Pfad) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3362860
scai (2022-11-20 19:30:41+00:00): Hi hag,

the Albert menorial was already present in OSM (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6865030429). With your edit you added a duplicate. I think it would be a good idea to revert your change and/or to merge both objects. Not sure if the monument is the stature in the center or the building-like structure that covers it.

Regards
Alex
harg (2022-11-20 22:56:22+00:00): Removed the name from all except the overall area.
Msiipola (2022-09-26 07:34:38+00:00): Hej! Sådana här korta vägar till bosättningar och byggnader är normalt "service", och inte "unclassfied".
Se följande sida hur vi mappar vägar och annat i Sverige:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Map_Features
Dice PostNord (2022-09-26 07:51:46+00:00): OK! Jag ändrar. Finns det någon gräns där vägen går över från "Service" till "unclassfied"
Msiipola (2022-09-26 08:12:45+00:00): Nej det finns inga hårda regler. Så det är egentligen svårt att kritisera någon för om den har valt "fel" vägtyp. 

Det finns ofta en gråzon, där den egna subjektiva åsikten får styra sitt val. Exempelvis finns det ofta långa skogsvägar, flera kilometer långa, som slutar vid en bosättning. Service eller Unclassfied? Jag väljer ändå oftast service, men andra tycker att man ska dela upp den i två delar med en kort serviceväg på slutet.

I det här fallet tycker jag dock att service-väg är det bästa valet.

Sedan har vi problemet i små vägar i flerfamiljsbostadsområden. Är vägar där service eller cykel/gång-väg? Om biltrafik är tillåten och är praktiskt/fysiskt möjlig, kan service vara rätt. Men det kan ju finnas förbud mot biltrafik, och då är service fel.

Mycket handlar därför om subjektiv bedömning. Det är syftet med vägen och vad den används till, som styr klassificeringen i OSM.
Msiipola (2022-09-26 08:14:38+00:00): Och läs gärna på avsnittet om vägar i wikitexten jag länkade.
Dice PostNord (2022-09-26 08:33:37+00:00): Bra, jag är relativt ny på OSM och lär mej hela tiden. Så tack för alla tips.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-26 12:38:59+00:00): Ciao. Il ponte era stato distrutto da una alluvione e pertanto erano stati introdotti i tag destroyed:bridge e destroyed:highway and posto di bridge e highway. Se il ponte e' stato ripristinato, questi tag dovevano essere ricambiati (bridge al posto di destroyed:bridge, ecc) . Ora c'e' una situazione dove sono presenti entrambi e questo non puo' essere corretto. Inoltre foot=yes su un highway=path e' l'accesso di default e pertanto e' inutile specificarlo. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126640872
Tjuro (2022-09-26 07:49:34+00:00): Hallo Michiel,

Welkom bij OSM,
De edit ziet er goed uit, alleen formateren wij telefoon nummers met het: +31 123 456 789 formaat.
"0317 418 418"
word dan:
"+31 317 418 418"

veder zou je ook nog even kunnen kijken naar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

MVG Tjuro
Tjuro (2022-09-26 07:55:15+00:00): Veder zou u ook nog aan kunnen geven hoe rolstoel toegankelijk plekken zijn met:
https://wheelmap.org/nodes/3013384422
eggie (2022-09-26 08:26:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2022-09-27 10:01:13+00:00): These nodes all have strange tags that shouldn't be in OSM. 
Please check the Wiki for the correct opening_hours=* syntax.

closing_hours = 17:00
opening_days = Monday |Tuesday | Wednesday| Thursday | Friday | Saturday
opening_hours = 08:30
weekend_closing_hours = 13:30
weekend_opening_hours = 08:30
Tjuro (2022-09-26 10:09:29+00:00): Ik map dit soort kruispunten wel vaker ik ga er vnv naar kijken
user_12894982 (2022-09-26 10:13:24+00:00): Top, dank je wel
eggie (2022-09-26 15:28:20+00:00): Hoi.. 'k Zag dat DvdHoven de fietsroute had hersteld. De relatie U32  is nog ergens onderbroken. 
Die zal ook hersteld moeten worden.

Je kunt geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met editor josm.

De tagging voor roundabout ontbreekt hier ook. 

Kijk jij nog Tjuro? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 15:35:28+00:00): oneway=yes ontbreekt ook op de toevoerwegen..  Routeren doet het niet goed in ieder geval.
Tjuro (2022-09-26 16:01:50+00:00): Ik heb ernaar gekeken, Er zijn een aantal dingen mis:

1.	De oost ingang wordt niet doorgetrokken tot de middelste ring.

2.	De rotonde is niet getaged met junction=roundabout. (welke delen precies wel en niet met junction=roundabout moeten ligt genuanceerd daar kom ik later op terug)

3.	De aankomst routes worden te vroeg gesplitst, het splitsings punt moet precies starten op het begin van de doorgetrokken lijn.

4.	De turn:lanes=* missen

5.	Er staan geen turn restricties 
op de rotonde

6.	De lanes=* missen

De geometrie klopt redelijk maar is toch iets te scheef.

Ik wil je aanraden om voor de middel-lange termijn te gaan kijken naar JOSM. Als je daar hulp bij nodig hebt moet je even naar de Discord komen. Daar wil ik of anderen je gerust helpen met opzetten.

Kijk maar even hoever je komt dan zal ik de turn restricties en de boel ergens in de loop van de week een keer controleren en eventueel afmaken.
eggie (2022-09-26 16:03:50+00:00): oneway yes vast even toegevoegd.. richting weg ongekeerd.. anders krijgen we ongelukken  :)
eggie (2022-09-26 16:06:18+00:00): Nog even wat extra leesvoer voor  AjdeH

Dit zijn echte hersenkrakers..

Rijstroken taggen 

Bovenkant formulier 

    Wat tips om rijstroken in te tekenen:  
    - Rijbaan: aparte way  
    - Rijstrook: dezelfde way, aangegeven met tags lanes en tags eindigend op :lanes  
    - Bij een op- of afrit is de punt van het puntstuk in principe de locatie om de way van de op- of afrit te laten beginnen.  
    - Aantal rijstroken (bijv. 3): lanes=3  
    - Voorsorteervakken: turn:lanes=left|through|through;right (een pipe | geeft de scheiding tussen rijstroken aan, een puntkomma als er meerdere waarden op een rijstrook thuishoren, zoals through;right)  
    - Uitvoegstrook: turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right of turn:lanes=||slight_right (geen tekst is gelijk aan none, maar het gebruik van none kan in dit geval duidelijker zijn)  
    - Doorgetrokken streep (bijv. tussen de midden- en rechterrijstrook): change:lanes=yes|not_right|no
user_12894982 (2022-09-26 16:21:29+00:00): Dank voor jullie support