piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
markkerrigan (2022-06-04 02:36:06+00:00): hello, thanks for your help, but one of your edits disconnected a block of street from a cycle route relation. I fixed it here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121920833 , but there might be some others that may have inadvertently become disconnected.
Andrew Kvalheim (2022-06-04 02:45:57+00:00): Hmm, thanks. I used JOSM’s split way function which I thought preserved relations, but perhaps I’m misinformed about that.
Andrew Kvalheim (2022-06-04 03:09:32+00:00): Ah, I didn’t download the relations so JOSM never knew I was breaking them. I’ll see about repairing the splits…
Lejun (2022-05-31 08:09:14+00:00): Je pense que tu as fait une erreur en utilisant la clé cuisine sur le bâtiment plutôt que sur un nœud non ?
Msiipola (2022-05-31 09:47:00+00:00): Hej! Här har du lagt in byggnader. Tyvärr är alla dessa felplacerade och är förskjutna ca 5 meter norrut.

Mapbox satellit, liksom alla satellitbakgrunder har ett mer eller mindre stort positionsfel. 
Bakgrunden måste därför alltid justeras/kalibreras mot kända positioner. Exempelvis Trafikverkets vägdatalager. Om du vill ha instruktion hur det görs, meddela mig.
Map-Peter (2022-06-01 23:12:00+00:00): Der "Feldberger Haussee" ist von hier und deinem CS in Brandenburg aber weit entfernt. ;-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-31 11:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121763406 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes in Florida.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6032 .
MasonSellsFL (2022-06-01 18:56:54+00:00): Looks suspiciously like vandalism. Whatever edits these fantasy mappers do seem to be where they mix good edits with fantasy mapping. I will have remove the fake roads on Don Pedro Island that cross between the state park and Little Gasparilla. There are no such roads, I have been to the island myself and know that no such road exists.

The alignment of 3 sisters drive edit looks maybe okay, will need to triple check that too. We cannot trust fantasy mappers.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-01 19:04:48+00:00): I teverted most of their other edits and can revert this too if you like (sometime later tonight)
SomeoneElse (2022-06-02 10:19:49+00:00): @MasonSellsFL Thanks for fixing these.  Does anything else need doing?
MxxCon (2022-05-31 04:39:36+00:00): Why is w1065359518 so zigzagy? Is that a mistake?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121740324
mbeyerle (2022-05-31 04:43:04+00:00): corrected in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121745735
gallseife (2022-05-31 09:27:43+00:00): Soweit ich weiß ist die Strecke durchaus in Betrieb, es fährt nur nichts wegen irgendwelcher Signalprobleme.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-31 11:31:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121763406 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes in Florida.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6032 .
Allison P (2022-07-18 20:41:32+00:00): I'm not very familiar with the Canyon assessor map. If roads and parcels appear, is the subdivision platted?
h551w (2022-12-17 00:14:22+00:00): I don't know for certain, but I at least haven't seen anything change between being added to the map and road construction finishing
VLD302 (2022-07-07 19:47:14+00:00): This road is not a trunk road, it's just a residential road. Is it possible to fix it?
pitfire (2022-05-31 04:47:07+00:00): Hallo BenutzerXYXY,
Welcome to OSM
Das Tag intermittent=* wird verwendet, wenn ein Wasserlauf (Fluss, Bach, Graben, ...) nicht ständig Wasser führt.
salt=no ist impliziert.  
Der Standardwert ist salt=no, er wird nicht angegeben.
BenutzerXYXY (2022-05-31 14:53:39+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
bin noch Neuling, daher vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Im iD-Editor war unter "Salz: Unbekannt" und "Periodisch: Unbekannt" angegeben, das verführte mich zu dieser Änderung. Gibt es ein "Verzeichnis der Standardwerte", das Sie mir verlinken könnten, so daß mir diese Fehler nicht häufiger passieren?
Werde meine Änderung umgehend revidieren.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-06 19:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted as it edited the whole building. If you wish to add a business use a separate node.
InsertUser (2022-06-12 09:37:37+00:00): Is this currently active? If it is a current police station that people can go to rather than an old building that keeps the name then it should normally be tagged as amenity=police.
mapbear66 (2022-05-31 07:18:47+00:00): Hi. Why have you added a railway track at Inverdruie where nothing like that exists?
mapbear66 (2022-05-31 07:29:41+00:00): You have also added a load of roads with highway=residential alongside Loch an Eilean, where none exist. 
Please let me know why you have done this as it looks like vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-31 11:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121764182 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some unlikely changes near Aviemore.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6032 .
aixbrick (2022-05-31 08:38:08+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121754982.
Die erstellten Abbiegebeschränkungen ergeben keinen Sinn. Es gibt bereits einen Poller (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9782489853), der die Sperrung darstellt und korrekt getaggt ist. Die Relationen sorgten außerdem dafür, dass auch Fahrräder, da nicht ausgenommen, nicht einfahren durften.
Gruß
user_5359 (2022-06-01 07:07:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1065368779. What is the meaning of the tag 200=150?

¡Bienvenido a OSM! Por favor, echa un vistazo a http://www.osm.org/way/1065368779. ¿Qué significa la etiqueta 200=150?

Además, no creo que esta área tenga el nombre listado. Me parecen más bien descripciones de esta zona.
Also, I don't think this area has the listed name. These look more like descriptions of this area to me.
elHornair (2022-05-31 00:06:07+00:00): This is my first edit, so I would appreciate a review. Things I was unsure about:
* Level of detail: should I add more points? Less?
* My GPS track appeared slightly right of the road that is (sometimes) visible in the satellite background. I gave preference to the satellite image. Is that correct?
* Is it correct, that a GPX track that tracks a road / way needs to be added by manually adding the points? GPX track should not be converted automatically, because then the map will contain too many points?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
Diacritic (2022-05-31 06:57:18+00:00): Hey Vadmium,

What are you using the interpolation for in these sitatuions in which each address is already mapped? My understanding of the interpolation tag is that it's only really used when there isn't any addresses in between.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121742239
Vadmium (2022-05-31 08:38:04+00:00): I use it so that OSM can find the addresses in the range. Before, searching for "475 High St, Preston" only brings up random segment of the road. This evening it comes up with a much closer location, even if not perfect. (I think it is the chemist on the corner, but haven't verified.)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Using_interpolation

In other cases I have surveyed the addresses at the end of each block, and done an interpolation between them. Much easier than, and almost as accurate as adding each address individually.
Diacritic (2022-05-31 10:29:54+00:00): Thanks Vadmium. Makes complete sense. I must have been a bit tired and missedthat the chemist didn't have a street number, but you explained it perfectly. :)

Sometimes I find the individual numbering of addresses tedious as well... have to be in the right mood for it!

Keep up the good work - Dian
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-31 02:06:44+00:00): Boa noite, vi que você mapeou algumas vias, espero que elas existam de fato, aqui neste projeto não mapeamos coisas que ainda vão ser construídas, segunda coisa, vi que você usou a camada mapbox satellite, cuidado ao editar baseado nesta camada, algumas coisas podem estar mais antigas, tente usar a camada de imagem: Maxar
Elder Nogueira (2022-05-31 12:40:38+00:00): Bom dia. Obrigado pela dica do Maxar. As vias existem sim!
mikko_tamura (2022-05-31 05:35:00+00:00): Please capitalize the name of your schools.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121743402
Anil Basnet (2023-12-07 17:08:07+00:00): Done.
Cy R (2022-06-02 18:51:10+00:00): Hello! I noticed that you answered "no" for "lit" on a few sidewalk/road segments on N 115th St. Aerial imagery shows those segments directly under street lamps. Just curious... are those lamps broken? Might be able to put in a request to get them fixed. Thanks
chroykot (2022-06-02 22:22:49+00:00): The sidewalk on the north side of N 115th St is definitely not lit. Perhaps there was construction in the area since the photography?
Cy R (2022-06-02 22:53:18+00:00): Heh, couldn't say. Thanks for the reply!
ivanbranco (2022-06-01 19:41:32+00:00): Hi Chuppyy,

welcome to OSM. I don't know georgian, so I need you to help me. You are writing "Name of this building" but then you are not adding a name=* tag but editing the already existing "addr:housenumber", which should contain the number of the house. Here the housenumber was 5 and you changed it with "5კვარტალი 5 კორპუსი", what does it mean?
tom_yorados (2022-05-31 20:51:08+00:00): Cool !
Glassman (2022-06-02 23:46:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121743965
Glassman (2022-06-02 23:47:31+00:00): the tag path=path isn't needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121743997
highflyer74 (2022-05-31 05:01:15+00:00): Hello!

Out of curiousity: can you point me to the place where access:delivery=* is documented? I haven't come across this tag yet.

All the best!
bathines (2022-06-07 06:31:30+00:00): Hi,
Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. We have started adding this tag based on OSM community suggestion. For further information, check this diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jguthula/diary/392437.
CloCkWeRX (2023-08-27 07:37:37+00:00): Is it safe to assume the "Subway" here is the fast food chain, not a building of a particular type?
Aalbers69 (2023-08-30 01:52:00+00:00): CloCkWeRX - According to the council rate system, 'Subway' is the name of the building.
iandees (2022-05-31 15:33:19+00:00): Hi! Thanks for updating the map. Please note that you added a place that already exists on the map. Please check that your data exists before adding it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121744356
MxxCon (2022-05-31 05:05:55+00:00): Hello.
"bicycle=unknown" is not a valid tag. If a situation is unknown then you shouldn't tag it. You can see it explicitly mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle
I think this edit should be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121744612
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 13:14:00+00:00): Actually, "<mode>=unknown" is a perfectly valid tag, but what the wiki says ("verify if it could be tagged with another tag") is also entirely correct.
I regularly use "unknown" when tagging access when it isn't clear from survey, and then often continue investigating to resolve the issue later.
wilfisher (2022-05-31 04:11:45+00:00): NYC does not allow bicycles on arterial roads where there is a dedicated bicycle path adjacent. However, Kings Hwy does not exactly fit this description; it is a very wide road with a service road on each side. It would be foolish and dangerous to ride a bicycle in the main thoroughfare with service roads on both sides. Unclear if strictly prohibited.
MxxCon (2022-05-31 05:08:47+00:00): This is similar to the other edit, bicycle=unknown is an invalid tag...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121744909
scruss (2023-02-11 17:38:31+00:00): thanks for your edits, but this location has been a Value Village for some years, and is not in North Battleford, SK
Josef73 (2022-11-01 18:17:36+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks.
Hannah Piggen (2022-05-31 04:57:01+00:00): In 9 days ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121302444 ) you haven't found time to inform the user?
Gazer75 (2022-05-31 04:58:40+00:00): Posted a comment on one of the changesets.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-06 19:19:39+00:00): Aeroway=runway is not an area tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121745909
Jan Olieslagers (2022-06-06 19:27:50+00:00): So they say, nah, some of them...
I for one disagree. Our own wiki article opens with "a runway is an area" ... What more do you want?
Jan Olieslagers (2022-06-06 19:31:54+00:00): Plus that I strongly hold to the principle that one runway should be mapped once and only once.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-06 22:49:43+00:00): A highway is also an area. Doesn't mean highway=tertiary is an area tag.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-06-07 05:21:14+00:00): The comparison with highways (or railways) is false. Runways cannot be joined into routes.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-22 11:56:48+00:00): @Jan Olieslagers : @Spaghetti Monster is correct here.  If you're unconvinced, look at the "taginfo" stratistics on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway .  Only 112 of the 61k runways have been mistagged as areas.  If you'd like to "colour in" runway areas then please use another tag to do that; don't use a tag corresponding to the linear runway itself.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-10-22 14:13:18+00:00): And what do you mean by a "linear runway"? Again, our very dear own wiki opens by defining a runway as an area.
ameziol (2022-06-07 18:33:46+00:00): droga nie powinna być rozdzielona, nie są to dwie jezdnie tylko zwykła wysepka dla pieszych, poczytaj wiki

zwracaj uwagę na relacje w jakich są linie w których gmerasz, np linie autobusowe lub relacja drogi krajowej

zrobię z tego spowrotem jedną jezdnie
silversurfer83 (2022-06-26 08:08:49+00:00): Hi,
anhand deiner vorherigen Änderungen gehe ich hier davon aus, dass es nicht beabsichtigt war ein CS über halb Deutschland anzulegen. OSMcha und ACHAVI haben leider große Schwierigkeiten, mir die Änderungen darzustellen, weshalb ich dich bitte, in Zukunft die Änderungen nach Möglichkeit etwas kleinräumiger zu gestalten :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
IlliaHai (2022-06-14 08:25:22+00:00): Please next time use smaller region to edit.
woodpeck (2022-06-07 14:38:37+00:00): Dear Mykhailo, please explain why you reverted this changeset. Please also make it a habit to explain the revert reason directly in your changeset comment in the future, rather than just writing "revert".
Hufkratzer (2022-06-14 19:57:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065412556 sieht im Luftbild für mich eher aus wie ein Reitplatz und nicht wie eine komplette Reitanlage, in diesem Fall wären dann da andere Tags sinnvoll, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz
da-sch (2022-06-16 05:25:06+00:00): Moin Hufkratzer,

danke für den Hinweis. Habe es korrigiert und passe es zukünftig an.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-25 18:08:16+00:00): Hier wurde surface=Asphalt gesetzt, aber tracktype ist grade2; das passt für mich nicht zusammen. Absicht?
ftcat (2022-05-31 07:11:07+00:00): Hi there is no bridge here just a crossing over a seasonal stream that will be dry for around 6 or 7 months of the year. There will not even be any structural ford
RockefellerPlateau (2022-06-01 11:36:22+00:00): Hello ftcat. Thank you for sharing your knowledge of the area. I’ve updated the road here where it crosses the seasonal stream. Happy mapping!
Hannah Piggen (2022-05-31 06:59:45+00:00): Sorry, bad.
Lejun (2022-05-31 09:14:28+00:00): Ils sont revenus au final ?
SIG Terres des Confluences (2022-05-31 11:38:09+00:00): Oui, ils y sont depuis octobre en fait.
rarad74 (2022-05-31 17:19:26+00:00): Salut. Te rog pune si tu comment la ce editezi ca sa poata vedea si ceilalti ce faci fara sa mai intre in changeset. Multumesc.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 17:02:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1064552316/history has access:motor_vehicle = delivery that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using motor_vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/motor_vehicle/&***/access%3Amotor_vehicle/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
Herman Lee (2022-05-31 10:57:22+00:00): Here you made some broken relations.
Herman Lee (2022-05-31 11:00:12+00:00): You also deleted a tag of w700886605 by mistake.
Hufkratzer (2022-05-31 22:20:40+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du die Reithalle umgetaggt? Jetzt ist sie auf der Karte nicht mehr zu sehen.
Hoagascht (2022-06-07 15:05:13+00:00): Warum sieht man sie dann auf der Karte nicht mehr? 

Tatsächlich ist es eine Reithalle.
Hufkratzer (2022-06-08 19:46:54+00:00): Die Reithalle wurde nicht mehr angezeigt weil:
1. du das Tag building=riding_hall entfernt hast (bzw. der iD-Editor das gemacht hat)
2. das Tag leisure=horse_riding auf der Standardkarte z. Zt. noch nicht dargestellt wird.
Inzwischen hast du die Reithalle aber als Reitplatz mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian umgetaggt. Wenn es eine Reithalle ist, dann war es am Anfang mit building=riding_hall aber besser. Vllt. liest du dazu mal die Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall . Auf der Homepage von dem Hof, die da jetzt zusätzlich angegeben ist, steht ja, dass die 2019 auch Reitplätze bauen wollten; wenn da jetzt welche sind, kann man die mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian taggen; und das ganze Gelände mit Reithalle, Reitplätzen, Stall, etc. evtl. mit leisure=horse_riding.
Msiipola (2022-05-31 09:38:43+00:00): Hej! Här finns flera fel. Track-vägen som du har lagt till korsar rv 55,56, men saknar gemensamma noder. Alla vägar, även cykel/gångvägar måste kopplas ihop med korsande vägar (oavsett typ) med gemensam nod. 
I det här fallet har du även lagt till övergångsställe för gående vilket vilket är fel, vad jag kan se. Om du vet att det finns ett övergångsställe låt det vara kvar annars ta bort.
Anton Melnichuk (2022-06-03 19:48:45+00:00): не треба мапити там де йде війна будь ласка
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B9%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE-%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B0
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
JeroenHoek (2022-05-31 08:02:43+00:00): layer=1 op de brugvlakken klopt niet. Deze zit daar op layer=0 en kan weggelaten worden. De onderliggende tunnel zit op layer=-1.
JeroenHoek (2022-05-31 08:06:10+00:00): Die barrier=wall bij het Alvestêdeplein klopt ook niet. Dat zijn blokken, geen muurtjes.
JeroenHoek (2022-05-31 08:10:33+00:00): Brommerdoorsteekjes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685112824) mappen we in Nederland als highway=cycleway, niet path.
JeroenHoek (2022-05-31 08:20:56+00:00): bus=yes op highway=bus_stop is ook overbodig.

De waarschuwingen die iD geeft zijn suggesties: het is niet de bedoeling dat je die blind toepast op een gebied. Daarmee verbeter je de data niet.
JeroenHoek (2022-05-31 08:34:32+00:00): En kijk eens goed naar deze luchtfoto:

https://postimg.cc/5jNdXmGg

En kijk nu nog eens naar de service-way die je hier verbindt met die steeg:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743811224

Je gaat dwars door het (ingetekende!) hek heen.
E de Wit (2022-05-31 10:09:11+00:00): Ook in deze changeset problemen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121694539

Zoals deze:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725682066

Het is niet de bedoeling om rücksichtslos alles zomaar te 'repareren', dit geeft de nodige schade.
JeroenHoek (2022-06-01 06:57:18+00:00): Ik heb beide changesets teruggedraaid hier:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121795987

Ik heb geprobeerd een aantal fixes die wel kloppen te behouden, maar het is te veel om alles handmatig na te lopen.

Reisinformatiegroep: je mapt rustig door zonder even te reageren. Dat is wel jammer. Je intenties zijn ongetwijfeld goed, maar neem even de tijd om de warnings die tools zoals iD geven te begrijpen. Als een warning in Nederland vaak voorkomt en niet klopt, meldt dat dan op het forum, zodat we dat op kunnen pakken met de ontwikkelaar van iD.
Reisinformatiegroep (2022-06-01 07:33:13+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, je geeft aan dat bus=yes op highway=bus_stop is ook overbodig. Maar als ik in OSM kijk dan lijkt dit standaard te zijn voor iedere bushalte dus ik begrijp je opmerking niet helemaal
JeroenHoek (2022-06-01 07:59:04+00:00): Standaard volgens wat precies? Op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop staat niets over bus=yes. Dat is ook nergens voor nodig, want een bus=yes is een access-tag. Die heb je alleen nodig als de bus er anders niet zou mogen komen (bijvoorbeeld een weg met access=no). Dat is doorgaans niet het geval bij highway=bus_stop.
MxxCon (2022-05-31 17:29:49+00:00): Hello.
Do you know the name of this business?
Additionally, phone number you entered is in invalid format. Please see this article that documents the correct way: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121753690
kubahahaha (2022-06-02 21:00:46+00:00): Czemu dodałeś obu tym budynkom taki sam adres?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034774920
Elmo1703 (2022-06-08 21:04:37+00:00): To są dwie klatki tego samego bloku. Mają wspólny garaż. Nr budynków również jest ten sam.
literan (2022-08-04 11:08:57+00:00): а почему в итоге в одну сторону осталось maxspeed=110, а в другую 90? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354106206
literan (2022-08-04 11:09:53+00:00): На М1 в Московской области то же самое - в одну сторону сделано, в другую нет
ZinaidaZ (2022-08-04 13:25:21+00:00): Да, не доделала, там зеркала старые были
ZinaidaZ (2022-08-04 13:27:54+00:00): Тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354106206 проверю, м4 я в обе стороны правила
М1 не всю доделала
ZinaidaZ (2022-08-04 14:11:17+00:00): Проверила - тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354106206 стоит электронное табло со 110.
В обратную сторону от развязки стоит знак ограничения с табличкой для легковых, и тут 52.8134,38.2972, как появляется электронное табло, меняется на 110 для всех.
Dimitar155 (2022-05-31 13:02:17+00:00): Hello Jan Olieslagers,

LB29 seems to be the correct ICAO code for this airport according to https://metar-taf.com/airport/LB29. Other websites also refer to that ICAO code.

Best regards,
Dimitar