piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 07:54:04+00:00): Poi non si possono migliorare delle relazioni solo perché sono pesanti? Certo magari non le modifico una volta al minuto, ma ci mancasse che non si possa modificare quello che si vuole almeno una volta. Secondo me si dovrebbe fare un refresh degli oggetti ogni volta che diventano troppo modificati, ogni 100 versioni per esempio. I.e. cancellare e ripristinare con versione 1, tanto le versioni precedenti rimarranno nel database del sito, per i paesi di solito il confine rimane lo stesso quindi non c'è bisogno della linea arancione che te lo indichi, sarebbero solo più difficili da trovare.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 08:07:40+00:00): >>>Ho cancellato i tag official name perché bloat facilmente ricostruibili sapendo le regole di ogni lingua.

Non ho capito. I name:xx con i country code sono i tag per le traduzioni. I tag che hai cancellato erano le esatte traduzioni nelle rispettive lingue. Perché cancellarle?

>>>Place=nation è più adatto, andrebbe usato su tutte le nazioni e country andrebbe usato sui paesi costitutivi di alcune nazioni come il Regno Unito. Il fatto che nessuno abbia mai mai pensato di farlo non è un valido motivo per dire che sia sbagliato

Anche non fosse sbagliato, non è così che si procede su OSM. Se vuoi rivoluzionare il tagging mondiale della nazioni crei una proposta sulla Wiki, se ne discute in mailing list, si vota. Se la community internazionale sarà d'accordo sarò il primo ad aggiornare il tagging. Ma non puoi buttare un place=nation non documentata in una relazione importante come quella dell'Italia.

>>> Poi non si possono migliorare delle relazioni solo perché sono pesanti?

Domanda retorica. Ovviamente si può. Io mi riferisco ai CS superflui. Per esempio ora bisognerà modificarla nuovamente per aggiungere i tag eliminati ed eliminare place=nation.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:30:25+00:00): --Domanda retorica. Ovviamente si può. Io mi riferisco ai CS superflui. Per esempio ora bisognerà modificarla nuovamente per aggiungere i tag eliminati ed eliminare place=nation.--
Ovviamente io mi riferivo al primo changeset, quelli dopo sono stati causati dalle discussioni scaturitene. Seguendo il suo ragionamento però non sarebbe abbastanza superfluo revertare nuovamente il mio changeset solo per riaggiungere due nomi (per modo di dire) e cambiare un tag poco importante?
--Non ho capito. I name:xx con i country code sono i tag per le traduzioni. I tag che hai cancellato erano le esatte traduzioni nelle rispettive lingue. Perché cancellarle?--
Certo che sono le traduzioni. Non le sembra inutile sapere che in francese repubblica italiana di dice republique italienne (o qualcosa del genere) quando le basterebbe sapere come si dice italiana e come si dice repubblica per farsela da solo la traduzione? Anche i software che usano OpenStreetMap per dare indicazioni di navigazione possono usare questo ragionamento, che però non vale per i nomi normali, quelli non li posso sapere a priori, quindi serve una traduzione.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:33:45+00:00): A proposito di nomi cancellato ho visto che mi ha commentato anche il fatto di aver cancellato dei nomi dalle relazioni degli enti locali di Milano e della provincia di Milano, o almeno mi sembra. L'ho fatto perché inutile avere le traduzioni di un nome in 3 posti diversi, è sufficiente averle nel nodo Milano.
meinmap (2021-11-11 08:41:43+00:00): Una proposta di modifica così importante come place=nation che potrebbe coinvolgere diversi paesi di tutto il mondo sarebbe buona prassi discuterla con altri utenti della community di OSM aprendo una pagina di discussione, a mio modo di vedere.
ivanbranco (2021-11-11 08:50:41+00:00): I namespace con le traduzioni non sono inutili oppure non esisterebbero
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:52:07+00:00): Infatti non ho detto che sono inutili i namespace e le traduzioni, ho detto che sono inutili i namespace e le traduzioni dell'official_name.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 08:55:05+00:00): Sono d'accordo sul fatto di passare dalla community per il nation, non ho detto il contrario.
Solo mi sembrerebbe poco sensato fare un changeset per modificare solo quello dopo che ha detto che non vanno fatti changeset superflui. Ciò detto io non ho intenzione di cancellare la sua modifica quindi lo può fare tranquillamente.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:01:46+00:00): Vandalism is the action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property. Io non sto distruggendo proprio un bel niente.
user_10901495 (2021-11-11 09:02:35+00:00): Credo di aver sbagliato cs.
MxxCon (2021-11-09 01:37:41+00:00): Hello.
Please try to keep your edits grouped into smaller geographic areas, be it a neighborhood, a city or a county. This way makes it easier for other people to understand what you edited and spot any potential issues. Unfortunately, the way OSM works, this edit of yours notified everybody who watches the map between North Austin and Bavaria, even if they are not in those regions.

Please see this article for more detailed explanation of this issue: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets 👍
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:50:47+00:00): Hi HansR2001, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

I guess your renaming is not correct. E.g., see https://allgaeu-erleben.com/2408-sonthofen.php

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
johnny_1982 (2022-06-18 13:47:14+00:00): In dieser Änderung wurde das existierende Basistelefon gelöscht. Es ist aber noch da! Es befindet sich im Bücherschrank, in der historischen Telefonzelle. Wieder hinzugefügt.
Wulf4096 (2021-11-16 18:56:45+00:00): Moinmoin!
Warum hast du denn meine Ladesäulen (Nodes 6514259861,6514259862) gelöscht?
westnordost (2021-11-16 23:49:16+00:00): Das muss ein Versehen gewesen sein. Sofern die nicht innerhalb der Europa-Passage waren, habe ich die nicht nicht gesehen.

Ich stelle sie wieder her.
westnordost (2021-11-16 23:59:19+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113874590

Haben jetzt neue Ids, ich habe nicht gefunden wie man in JOSM neuen Elementen stattdessen bestehende ids geben kann. Vielleicht kann JOSM das auch nicht, wäre jedenfalls ein potenziell ziemlich destruktives Feature.
Wulf4096 (2021-11-17 07:44:11+00:00): In JOSM geht das per File / Undelete object, mit dem "undelete" Plugin. Hab's nochmal geradegerückt :-)

Die Ladestationen sind unten in der Tiefgarage. Ist auch alles ziemlich verwinkelt, wo daher weiß ich nicht, wie weit die Nodes vom tatsächlichen Standort entfernt sind.
tomhukins (2021-11-21 18:40:26+00:00): Hi, thank you for these useful improvements to the map.  In this changeset you altered the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245941740 from "Alport Heights" to "Alport Height".  This makes sense and matches the title of its Wikipedia and Wikidata articles.  However, "Alport Heights" is a commonly used name for this place, so I've added it back as an alt_name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114068834 to help searches for https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=alport heights return useful results.
DanSpen101 (2021-11-23 10:36:43+00:00): Thanks Tom, agree. I use Alport Height/ heights interchangeably
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 05:20:18+00:00): أنت مصر على تغيير هذا المكان وحذفه أو تغييره نرجوا منكم عدم العبث بهذا المكان
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 09:39:55+00:00): Is this road really an embankment?
Is the name correct.
هل هذا الطريق حقا جسر؟
هل الاسم صحيح. 

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 05:42:32+00:00): تم تصحيح التصنيف وإضافة وسم مقبرة للمكان https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113927459
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 05:39:29+00:00): الواضح من صور الأقمار الصناعية أن هذا الطريق ليس مخصصاً للمشاة وتمشي به السيارات نرجوا منكم عدم تغيير تصنيف الطرق
eggie (2021-11-09 20:07:49+00:00): Hoi..
Eigenlijk kun je geen wegen bewerken als er een routerelatie overheen loopt, maar ik zie nergens dat je wegen hebt gesplitst. Ik heb bij  u78 detour de volgorde hersteld.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-09 20:12:18+00:00): Dat foutje zal niet door jouw actie zijn gekomen.

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-10 06:43:28+00:00): Typo.. Eigenlijk geen wegen bewerken ' met editor iD'. Die veroorzaakt vaak schade in de routedelen volgorde ..met josm kan het wel.
Gr eggie
Alecs01 (2021-11-09 18:13:24+00:00): Perchè devi modificare le convenzioni che sono già in uso? In nessuna relazione di comuni italiani il nome principale è "Comune di ...", per quale motivo dovresti cambiarlo? Se vuoi farlo, discutilo prima con gli altri per piacere, non ha senso che alcuni comuni abbiano un nome diverso dagli altri.
Secondo punto, name:it si usa per il nome italiano di un oggetto che ha nomi in più lingue, non per una versione abbreviata o altro dello stesso nome ("Samolaco" non è la traduzione in italiano di "Comune di Samolaco"; la tua modifica, nel caso non te ne fossi accorto, implica che il nome "Comune di Samolaco" non sia in lingua italiana, visto che il nome italiano è diverso).
Ancora, perchè cambiare name:lmo in loc_name per il nome dialettale di Madesimo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9083597105/history
loc_name invece si presume sia nella stessa lingua di name (l'esempio può essere una "Piazza Garibaldi" che si chiami informalmente "Piazza del mercato" perchè lì ci fanno il mercato, per dire).
praeteritum (2023-06-07 05:33:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137039825.
nmombo12 (2021-11-09 18:23:15+00:00): I had seen another user remove features in the golf course due to construction in 2020. What is the estimated date of the aerial imagery used as a source?
TCarp (2021-11-10 16:36:11+00:00): The pond on the 7th hole on this imagery in late 2020 was being removed to form a creek that now shows in March 2021. When the next Bing imagery comes out it will show the new 7th and proper changes should be made then.
nmombo12 (2021-11-11 15:19:50+00:00): Thanks, makes sense!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 12:21:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43804435/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
Shrinks99 (2025-05-15 19:55:05+00:00): Oof a mistake!  I have fixed this.  Thanks for checking my work!
mweper (2021-11-09 10:36:41+00:00): Hola. Por favor, no muevas elementos en el mapa sin antes conocer como utilizar lo básico del editor y sus distintas secciones, ya que cuesta tiempo y dedicación corregir.
Al ver este conjunto de cambios, no se observa ninguna edición positiva al mapa por lo que tuve que revertirlo completo.

Si tienes alguna duda al respecto, puedes ponerte en contacto con cualquier miembro de la comunidad Argentina.
mweper (2021-11-09 10:36:46+00:00): Hola. Por favor, no muevas elementos en el mapa sin antes conocer como utilizar lo básico del editor y sus distintas secciones, ya que cuesta tiempo y dedicación corregir.
Al ver este conjunto de cambios, no se observa ninguna edición positiva al mapa por lo que tuve que revertirlo completo.

Si tienes alguna duda al respecto, puedes ponerte en contacto con cualquier miembro de la comunidad Argentina.
praeteritum (2023-06-06 05:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136996752.
ravali_78 (2021-11-10 13:21:54+00:00): Hi Sri Wahyuningsih,
I have fixed classification gaps and incorrectly tagged highways.Kindly check with way 1000669146, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113607843.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113544999
literan (2021-11-09 20:42:47+00:00): ничего себе, оперативно
冰觞沐雨 (2021-11-09 02:29:24+00:00): source：《北京地铁车辆段总图布置方案综合分析》& 我的Nimby Rails游戏存档
NiLaKol (2021-12-27 05:59:49+00:00): Hallo,
mit diesem und vielen anderen CS entfernst du Knoten welche eine Adresse repräsentieren, an der (noch) kein Gebäude steht/eingetragen ist. 
Mit deinem CS-Kommentar "fixed" und der dort angegebenen Quelle "mapbox" kann ich diese Änderung nicht nachvollziehen. Kannst du bitte erläutern weshalb du diese Knoten entfernt hast?
NiLaKol (2021-12-27 07:18:49+00:00): hier noch die direkt versendete Nachricht in Kopie:
Hallo WoodB, auf openstreetmap.org habe ich dir einige Fragen zu deinen letzten Bearbeitungen gestellt, da ich deine Änderungen nicht nachvollziehen kann. Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion und helfe mit den Hintergrund deiner Änderungen aufzuklären, um so zur Qualität von OSM beizutragen: <url> Viele Grüße,
NiLaKol
SekeRob (2021-11-09 11:16:54+00:00): Hi,

and Wow, an ice cream parlor that requires a bound-box area from La Rochelle to Napoli. Was that really in the plan for every mapper in-between to see this, or could it have been split so only the members with 'local knowledge' get to view this in their active change set history ;?

Just saying.

ciao (from the ice cream kings of the world).
Peter Newman (2021-11-09 16:56:54+00:00): Yeah sorry, I spotted ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8929448769 ) which looks like a clear error when looking for the one I was trying to add and thought it was worth flagging it before I forgot about it. Apologies for the spam.
SekeRob (2021-11-09 19:19:21+00:00): OK,

BTW note the warning in the CS. A Glacier in french does not translate well to the english natural=glacier which is a tag belonging to an area ice mass object. We used to have one nearby, the most southern of Europe, but it's as good as gone now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calderone_glacier

ciao
Peter Newman (2021-11-09 21:30:38+00:00): Yes, that's why I left a note on the node and caused this whole discussion; in French glacée is ice, so I assume that's where the confusion has come from, unless there really is a tiny glacier within a shop on the French coast...
GME squeeze (2021-11-14 17:37:28+00:00): Hi, 
Yes it is an ice cream shop and no, there's no tiny glacier inside aha. I was editing on OSMand, where the translation is incomplete (glacier = ice cream shop in french)... Thank you, I corrected it.
tlconrd (2021-11-09 04:34:10+00:00): source: http://owlsheadgps.com/map/
渤海西岸 (2021-11-09 06:19:15+00:00): 同学你好，最近发现很多你班同学在株洲一带画图，不过大部分的编辑都有误，你们可以参考唐山、苏州、防城港、洛阳这些绘制比较完善地区的画法
archpdx (2021-11-11 08:26:12+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your recent contributions. Please note that we don't use names to describe things on the map (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For example, for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9236934919 you should remove the name and instead make this point a 'Viewpoint'.
hmkaiser (2021-11-11 09:53:58+00:00): Hello,
you have added two "man_made=chimney", also tagged as "building=warehouse". That´s wrong, only "man_made=chimney" has to be use.
user_5359 (2023-07-19 06:20:21+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1000695194. What is the mean of the tag fee:yes = #b0a060?
mbethke (2023-07-22 03:36:56+00:00): Hi! Good point, that's probably a typo—mixup between fee=yes and building:colour. Fixed in #138836673.
cheers,
Matthias
abakus_uploader (2021-11-09 23:31:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
emo_sami (2021-11-16 09:45:02+00:00): Dear malathanaya;
Please make sure you are using the most updated imagery in your edits and please stop doing wrong highway connections
and you can find that Maxar imagery is the most updated in Qatar.
Regards
emo_sami
FreedSky (2022-02-24 15:22:49+00:00): 请查阅发改委批复地图和机场站结构，请不要参考高德百度地图
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Dodko (2021-11-11 07:54:22+00:00): Otváracie hodiny https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73220045 je potrebné zapisovať presne podľa pravidiel, inak to aplikácie nepoužijú.
Pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_hours
Rado209 (2021-11-12 09:35:45+00:00): Ďakujem veľmi pekne! Opravil som. pridával som prvý krát čas a mal som využiť možnosť skontrolovať po sebe... čo som si ani neuvedomil že toto som ešte nerobil. Tak ešte raz vďaka a prosím ťa kde si prišiel k tomu toolu? lebo na wiki som to nenašiel pritom v sekcii tools by to malo byť hádam ako prvé.
Rado209 (2021-11-12 09:37:34+00:00): + by ma zaujímalo ako si sa vlastne dostal k tejto mojej úprave a všimol si si aj zlé otváracie hodiny?
Dodko (2021-11-12 09:47:57+00:00): Na stránke https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_hours je "YoHours, webová stránka umožňující vytvářet otevírací doby pouhým přetažením časových intervalů na kalendář." Ale odkazuje na nesprávny web tak opravím.

Nový používatelia sú na stránke https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/newestosm?c=Slovakia
Dodko (2021-11-12 10:05:00+00:00): Aha ty nie si nový, tak som to asi našiel len náhodou keď som niečo pozeral v okolí, už si nepamätám.
Rado209 (2021-11-12 13:05:52+00:00): Dík, slabo som hľadal je tam ten nástroj.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
gscscnd (2022-03-15 17:12:55+00:00): IMHO dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971609180 lepsze byłoby residential.
Marek_P (2022-03-15 19:03:55+00:00): Kwestia dyskusyjna. Mi osobiście pasuje secondary_link. Jedyna funkcja jaką ten odcinek spełnia, to bycie "wydzielonym pasem skrętu omijającym główną tarczę skrzyżowania", co jest żywcem wyjęte z definicji *_link na Wiki. Jedyny mankament, to że głupio wygląda na renderze OSM.
CRCulver (2023-07-16 19:40:08+00:00): This changeset marked Rynek street in Strzelin as highway=living_street. Was this based on the presence of the official Polish signage for living streets? I cycled here yesterday and I can’t remember seeing anything like that, so I would expect highway=residential here.
Marek_P (2023-07-16 19:57:58+00:00): Yes. It's signed as living street. For me it's stupid, but is true.
Look here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.78210824382&lng=17.071343564045&z=17&pKey=215122433748967&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.780226803624&lng=17.072002477179&z=17&pKey=186210196696034&focus=photo&x=0.49138265930332187&y=0.4854261880903877&zoom=0
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
vulasala (2021-11-10 07:56:05+00:00): Hi Rofi' Ronaa,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 1000713893 and way 570157681 and aligned some highways which are misaligned.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113550943
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-12 10:00:31+00:00): 兄弟，我就是好奇一下，你是咋获取到这么多的数据的，还都如此精准，全都带有准确的编号
alexashh (2022-07-07 18:07:18+00:00): Развороты должны запрещаться не тегом на участке дороги, а отношением, включающим откуда и куда выполняется разворот
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Отношения_-_ограничения
fabiotofy (2021-11-09 13:18:10+00:00): Ciao! Hai visto che vi è un doppio civico 2 per Via Ippolito Nievo? Sai quale dei due andrebbe modificato/eliminato ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113551723
Luca Dorigo (2021-11-17 22:02:20+00:00): la questione è curiosa. la via "interna" Ippolito Nievo ha un cartello con scritto "civico 2, interni da 1 a 19" (se non ricordo male), stessa cosa per l'altro civico. si vede anche da streetview. A breve faccio di nuovo un sopralluogo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113551723
escada (2021-11-09 18:55:48+00:00): Hallo Thibault, op het forum wordt een navigatie probleem gemeld op deze plek. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=846160#p846160
Kan je daar even naar kijken aub
Thibault Rommel (2021-11-09 20:32:07+00:00): Hallo. Dit wordt reeds besproken in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82315595
escada (2021-11-10 05:11:43+00:00): OK, bedankt !
hfs (2021-11-09 20:28:35+00:00): Hier hatte ich leider einige nötige Änderungen übersehen und in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113582665 nachgeholt.
Hungerburg (2021-11-11 09:00:52+00:00): Hallo Simon, um Fußrouting zu kontrollieren verwende ich https://www.routago.de/pedestrian-routing/?lang=de&map=47.2650236,11.3980351,19&start=47.26511,11.3985273&ziel=47.2649044,11.3968241 - das produziert recht gute Anleitungen und wertet Gehsteig Tags aus. Wenn du dich beeilst dann siehst du, wie das ohne extra Fußwege dort durchleitet.

OSRM geht sowieso auf der Straße, wenn es da kürzer ist. Das taugt dazu überhaupt nicht. Wieso auch, das ist eben für Autos gemacht.

Diese extra Wege sind mir ein Dorn im Aug, dabei hab ich einen davon ja selber angelegt, damit die Bozner Platz Runde an die Straßen angebunden ist aber nur. Dringender erscheint mir, diese Plattform Routing-Insel vorm Sauterhaus ins Netz einzubinden. Kennst du da eine Möglichkeit? Ohne gleich zig Kilometer Schienen für Fußgänger zu legen?
simon04 (2021-11-12 08:21:10+00:00): Hallo Hungerburg, ich stimme dir zu – das pedestrian crossing/sidewalk mapping ist unschön, insbesondere wenn man es nur partiell im Kreuzungsbereich macht.

Grund meiner Änderung war, dass ich mittels OsmAnd von der Anichstraße zum Bahnhof geroutet habe und "ums Eck" via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830071574 geroutet wurde.

Ich habe nichts gegen eine sinnvollere Lösung ohne meiner neuen Wege, eventuell ohne der komplexen Lösung mit den zwei Ästen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830071574 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829855007

Grüße!