piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Deanna Earley (2016-03-28 15:59:07+00:00): FYI, we don't put transliterated names into osm. 
Names in other languages should only ever be entered if that object is truly known by that name, in that language. 
Please see this page for more details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration
Deanna, DWG.
Wynndale (2016-03-28 21:16:42+00:00): The idea of special restrictions on any sort of multiple-language names was comprehensively rubbished on the mailing list last year. http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Can-wikidata-links-help-fight-name-inflation-td5846168.html Unfortunately the wiki hasn’t caught up until now.
Deanna Earley (2016-03-28 22:20:06+00:00): As had been said by other members of the DWG, osm is not the place to store transliterations. 
A name should only ever be added to osm, if that place actually has that name. 
If you want a local transliteration, then the data user can do that itself. 
Do not make up translated data just because it looks good. 
Map what is on the ground. 
Anything else does not belong in osm.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-28 22:22:42+00:00): @Wynndale It wasn't "comprehensively rubbished" - for example, there's been no good answer to "How do we tell real names in use in a place from translations" and "It's not a 
reasonable request to ask OSM to store up to 7,000 variants against 
45,000,000 names, when most of those objects simply do not have names in 
those languages." (quoting myself from https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-May/thread.html#73015 there).  You've also just edited the wiki to make it look like OSM's view matches yours.  Your view may be right or wrong (personally I think it's wrong because I've done the maths), but changing the "evidence" to back up your point of view is somewhat underhand.
woodpeck (2016-03-28 22:23:23+00:00): ... and on the rare occasions where you haven't actually observed a sign that carried the name you're adding, please specify your source so that it may be verified.
etajin (2016-03-31 13:24:35+00:00): Japanese names are mainly from Wikipedia:ja, For example, name:ja "ヴォログダ" for the name "Вологда" is based on https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%B4%E3%82%A9%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B0%E3%83%80
If a POI has the name "Вологда", Japanese will call it "ヴォログダ", so when a Japanese find the signal with name:ja "ヴォログダ", he will know it's the signal in the city of Вологда.

If you feel it's "too much", I will add name:ja only to major cities, район, область and so on.
Deanna Earley (2016-03-31 13:48:49+00:00): etajin: But it's never going to be labelled (on the ground) as "ヴォログダ", therefore it shouldn't really be tagged as such. The place node/relation maybe, but nothing else.
Korwin (2016-03-27 09:01:38+00:00): Пардон, комментарий к правке был автоматом вставлен из предыдущей и не исправлен.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:02:09+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
Kostik (2016-03-27 15:45:52+00:00): wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance

parking_entrance - это въезд на парковку, а тут здание 7-8 этажей, значит должен быть building=yes как минимум.
daradan (2016-03-27 16:16:22+00:00): т.е. правильнее будет так?!
amenity parking
building yes
building:levels	8
Kostik (2016-03-27 18:54:25+00:00): Не нашёл в вики, но думаю что так правильней чем просто amenity=parking_entrance
Thomas8122 (2016-03-28 07:47:56+00:00): Hallo Fabian, einige Anmerkungen: wenn du schon die Adresse vom Punkt auf das Haus überträgst, dann doch bitte richtig. Dann lass bitte addr:state und addr:district weg, hab ich bei einer deutschen Adresse noch nie gesehen. Gruß Thomas
Thomas8122 (2016-04-04 16:19:45+00:00): Danke für das Gespräch. Ich hab es selbst gemacht.
Hjart (2016-03-27 11:17:09+00:00): Klip venligst ikke veje op i meget små stykker. Jeg har på grund af dette reverteret dette rettesæt.
Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (2016-04-01 04:49:48+00:00): Hej Hjart
Gør hvad du vil - jeg gør det samme, og jeg har teoretisk set sympati og forståelse for budskabet i denne ændring. Og naturligvis læser jeg min mail.
Venligst J K
5m4u9 (2016-03-27 18:05:03+00:00): Gracias por editar el mapa. Espero continúes mejorando en los lugares que frecuentes.

Existe varios canales de comunicación de la comunidad para resolver dudas, preguntar, aprender nuevas cosas, saber de eventos, etc.

correo -> osmcbba@openmailbox.org
twitter -> https://twitter.com/osmcbba
La lista de correo -> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-bo/
Grupo de telegram -> https://telegram.me/joinchat/AGgV1gbUsjC5hI5uuo70qg

Todos los sábados en el HackLab Cochabamba puedes pasar, preguntar y conocer cómo utilizar OSM en varias cosas.
luch86 (2016-03-29 20:16:03+00:00): Единое здание разделено на два, удалена арка, удалена этажность, поломаны мультиполигоны. Как всё это понимать?
apm-wa (2018-06-25 17:29:39+00:00): Thanks for mapping this, but no highway in Turkmenistan is signed "street".  I just drove on this road today and it is signed "şaýoly", and it is not signed at all outside the village limits, so I am editing this to correct it.
Hjart (2016-03-27 14:53:08+00:00): Der findes mange typer af shelters og derfor kan det være en rigtig god ide at specificere hvilken type det er (se http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter)
mremil (2016-03-27 20:26:38+00:00): Modtaget. Kunne ikke gennemskue det fra OsmAnd appen. 

Har desuden tagget som access=private, da man skal booke/betale og få en kode til låsen. Jvf her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type

Håber det er rigtigt.
Hjart (2016-03-28 17:51:33+00:00): Ok. Nej der er ofte ikke for megen info at hente i Osmands brugerflade :-). basic_hut havde jeg ikke set før. 

I tilfælde som dette kan det ofte være en ide at uddybe i nøglen "description"
chnav (2016-05-01 05:08:34+00:00): Highways' status set too high; reverting back to unclassified, it is only local roads. Even not every town in Kazakhstan has secondary hw )) Please read Wiki for status convention and do not map for Mapnik render. Thanks.
R0bst3r (2016-03-29 19:09:56+00:00): Hallo kartenleser, du hast für die Eintragung von Firmen die tags mail und page verwendet, ebenso beliebige keys für Firmennamen. Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081175946/history

Besser wäre es, du würdest die definierten Keys verwenden, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

Dies wären z.B. email=*, website=* oder eben name=*

Ich hab mir erlaubt die Änderungen an obigem Node vorzunehmen.

Gruß, R0bst3r
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:02:21+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:24:37+00:00): This is a byway restricted to use by foot and by horse. The surface is grass not bare ground. The restriction is to motorized traffic therefore vehicle=no is the tag, there may be agricultural vehicle use by the owner. It is thus a bridleway rather than a formal track. The NCC definitive map designation by order is Restricted Byway.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:03:04+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:03:20+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:05:43+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:09:59+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map".

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:11:44+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map". No public rights for vehicle use here.

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:13:44+00:00): No evidence of public vehicle use here
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:14:45+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map". No public vehicle use here.

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:15:50+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "in accordance with Norfolk County Council public rights of way map". no public vehicle use here.

I can revert your changes back the the original state for you if you wish.
j-wills (2016-03-27 18:37:57+00:00): Описание можно и на русском писать ;)
user_3446941 (2016-04-01 14:27:46+00:00): Ha! Yes, you're right, that was (mostly)me. I had no exact idea of where they were, just that they existed. I added them in the hope they would be amended. Generally I see folks will adjust stuff to help, but see the task of adding stuff as too onerous, so I though I'd get it started.
lakedistrict (2016-04-01 15:52:31+00:00): Thanks for adding them - saved me (or someone else) a lot of time! :-)
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 14:57:34+00:00): There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Hayntons Lane.
BCNorwich (2016-03-27 15:03:50+00:00): There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Sallow Lane. Sallow Lane is designated by NCC definitive map as a "Public Footpath". There is no evidence that this section of way is named Sallow Way.
Vintagejhan (2016-03-27 15:11:34+00:00): 不好意思因為同時間編輯，所以有些建築重複到了，我就視情況刪除部分我繪製以及您繪製的建築了
andrewpmk (2016-03-27 20:17:08+00:00): Please refrain from making edits like this. TD has started to remove the "Canada Trust" name from the signs of certain bank branches, I think that they may discontinue using the "Canada Trust" name in the future, so some branches are only called "TD" now. (Although banks that are only named "Canada Trust" are certainly incorrect because they changed name a long time ago when TD merged with Canada Trust). I would suggest that you only make edits like this if you have surveyed the location or can see the bank's sign on Mapillary.
cdavila (2016-03-27 20:31:51+00:00): I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused. I'll stop such edits.
Hjart (2016-03-27 15:31:38+00:00): Hvad er det for en art rute du forsøger at lave?
Hjart (2016-03-27 16:15:09+00:00): Det du lavede her var knap så heldigt, så jeg har fjernet det igen.
Supaplex (2016-03-27 16:25:54+00:00): Hi

要用加油站的tag amenity=fuel
再加上fuel:LH2=yes
可參考wiki的敘述
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel

我已經修改好了
AlaskaDave (2020-06-19 00:56:12+00:00): Hi,
I do a lot of mapping in Alaska and am very interested in this proposed bridge. Unfortunately, the URL you provided in this Changeset comment doesn't exist at this time. Do you happen to have an updated link or source of information?

Thanks,
Dave
exe (2020-07-13 21:16:03+00:00): Hi Dave,
so you can find stuff out there if you google for "Tanana River Bridge" and "Northern Rail Extension":
https://www.kiewit.com/projects/transportation/rail/northern-rail-extension/

https://fm.kuac.org/post/tanana-river-bridge-nearly-done-state-officials-can-t-predict-fate-next-phase

As far as you can get recent information, it seems the bridge is still in use by the military as a road bridge and not connected to any railroad yet.

Hope this helps,
Cheers
AlaskaDave (2020-07-13 22:58:02+00:00): Yes, it does. It appears the project is stalled for lack of funds. I don't expect that to change any time soon, especially now that Covid has paralyzed the economies of both the state and the country.
Thanks,

Dave
Wulfmorn (2018-11-17 01:17:40+00:00): are you sure you want this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081403321 to be highway=step? its a one of a kind tagging globally. :)
DD1GJ (2016-03-27 16:50:51+00:00): Hallo Christian, ich habs mal optimiert. Auf der Internetseite der Arzpraxis ist aber immer noch Gogle Maps zu sehen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081374067
Christian Brand (2016-03-27 17:30:38+00:00): Tausend Dank!
Das war definitv in meinem Sinne - und wegen der Seite: die ist noch nicht online. Sie kann aber schon hier angesehen werden: http://hautarzt-ratingen.de/new/
Nakaner (2016-03-28 07:59:24+00:00): This changeset will be reverted soon because we do not have the permission to use content from northernrailextension.com. See http://www.northernrailextension.com/privacy.htm for details.
exe (2016-03-28 09:19:39+00:00): I removed those changes myself. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I guess the Tanana River Bridge has to be removed too then?
OSM-Bot (2016-10-17 12:53:02+00:00): [..Osthafenbahn-Tunnel soll verfüllt werden..]
was soll diese Information bringen?

Vielen Dank für den Vandalismus!
anbr (2016-10-17 16:24:43+00:00): Ich verbitte mir derartige Unterstellung !

Aber ich erkläre auch Anfängern gern was die Information besagt:

Die Gleise der Osthafenbahn sind nicht  "disused", da sie nicht mehr angebunden sind und damit nicht reaktiviert werden können, des weiteren liegt kein Gleiskörper mehr vor, deshalb wurde der Status in "railway=abandoned" bzw razed geändert

*PLONK*
Essin (2016-03-30 00:01:22+00:00): Att använda Google Maps som källa till OSM är förbjudet både av OSM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#2a._Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F och Google https://www.google.com/intl/en/help/terms_maps.html (se särskilt punkt 2d). Möjligtvis är det tillåtet att använda enstaka uppgifter https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-se/2016-February/002888.html men detta är omdiskuterat. Vilka uppgifter i den här redigeringen kommer från Google Maps?
nicolito (2016-03-30 11:00:27+00:00): Jag har i efterhand kontrollerat i streetview att jag inte satt hastighetsgränserna fel. Det var dumt nu när jag läser ordentligt.  Grunduppgifterna ärdock baserade på min egen körning på sträckorna jag redigerat.  Jag ska inte göra det mer. Går det att ta bort redigeringen?
Essin (2016-03-31 18:45:48+00:00): Det går att återställa, men eftersom du också har kollat själv på plats är detta nog ett gränsfall som det som diskuterades på mejllistan. Jag kan hjälpa dig med återställningen om du vill vara helt på den säkra sidan.
nicolito (2016-04-01 19:23:11+00:00): Det är ju bäst att ta bort redigeringen nu när det inte är helt klart ifall det är okej. Det sista jag vill är att OSM ska bli lidande eftersom det är ett fantastiskt användbart och bra "projekt". Kan du tala om för mig hur jag återställer redigeringen så är jag tacksam.
Essin (2016-04-06 20:58:13+00:00): Ledsen att jag missade att följa upp det här. Det finns en återställningsplugin till JOSM som du kan testa att använda: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter Den är som JOSM i allmänhet: inte helt intuitiv men väldigt användbar när man förstår hur den fungerar.
bueffeltaler (2016-04-01 12:52:12+00:00): Hallo,
vor einigen Tagen habe ich die Relationen des Main-Radweges der örtlichen Beschilderung angepasst.
Kann mir jemand erklären, weshalb diese wieder rückgängig gemacht wurden?

Danke
maraf24 (2016-06-16 10:29:24+00:00): Kolego, a dlaczego pokasowałeś prawidłowe tagi przystanków kolejowych?
Natsuyasumi (2016-06-16 17:13:53+00:00): A nie zostawiłem railway=halt / railway=station? Jeżeli tak to przepraszam :/
maraf24 (2016-06-16 17:24:58+00:00): railway=station zostawiłeś, ale railway=halt i railway=platform nie.
Uzupełniłem chyba wszędzie gdzie brakowało. Dodałem też train=yes, bo też nie wszędzie było.
Сергій Дубик (2016-03-27 20:29:19+00:00): Thanks for "contact:instagram" fix!
d1g (2016-08-26 17:06:57+00:00): после этого пакета

addr:street=улица Горелый Хутор 

у Самары www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3368701/history
SimonPoole (2016-03-31 06:23:42+00:00): Hallo, du scheinst an Vielen Orten in der Schweiz, speziell aber in der Innerschweiz Orts- und Strassennamen hinzuzufügen ohne Quellenangabe. Das ist speziell in Stans merkwüdig, da es keine entsprechende offenen Daten gibt, die dafür verwendet werden könnten.

Kannst du die Quelle dafür bitte nennen?
donovaly (2016-04-03 01:10:33+00:00): > da es keine entsprechende offenen Daten gibt

Hallo SimonPoole,

wie ich schon Benutzer "Stans" in einer Nachricht schrieb, verwende ich das eidgenössische Gebäude Wohnungs Register:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/?X=200790.00&Y=670675.00&zoom=8&lang=de&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.swissimage&catalogNodes=457,491&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register

Die Flurnamen sind die offiziellen Namen, die die Gemeinde hat eintragen lassen.
Ich denke dass sich eine spezielle Quellenangabe erübrigt, denn genaugenommen ist es nichts Anderes, als wenn man Namen Straßenschildern bei OSM einträgt, denn diese wurden auch von der Gemeinde vergeben. Früher gab es noch offizielle Gemeinde-Stadt/Flurpläne, jetzt findet man die alle bequem elektronisch bei map.geo.admin.ch

Ansonsten an dieser Stelle vielen Dank für Ihre praktischen Listen:
http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/

viele Grüße
donovaly
SimonPoole (2016-04-07 12:15:06+00:00): Du verstehst da was falsch. Die GWR Daten auf maps.geo.admin.ch sind -keine- offenen Daten und dürfen nur von der SwissTopo auf der Karte (eine spezielle Ausnnahme in der Verordnung zum GWR) und für einige ganz wenige sonstige Anwendungen (gegen Entgelt) verwendet werden. Wir (OSM) durfen die nicht geo-referenzierten Strassen- und Ortsnamen aus dem GWR benutzen, die gibt aber nur Auskunft über die Existenz der Strasse und nicht des Ortes.

Auch die Flurpläne der Gemeinden darfst du natürlich ohne entsprechende Lizenzierung/Bewilligung natürlich nicht nutzen.
yvecai (2022-01-07 12:54:05+00:00): I'm working on ski routing. I wonder what do you mean by ski=no on this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27150347
It is however a membewr of a skitour route.
Schermy (2022-01-07 17:48:36+00:00): Hi, this is very special. The owner of the way don't allow skiing on the street. Only walking is allowed. Skiing is allowed still the track after the wood begins. Best regards
yvecai (2022-01-07 18:12:05+00:00): OK, nice to know this is a genuine mapping!
Regards,
Yves
voschix (2022-06-13 07:27:01+00:00): Regarding relations 6085519: I don't think it is correct to give to a landuse polygon within the Colli Berici the name of the group of hills. The Colli Berici include areas that have a different landuse.
Владимир К (2016-04-11 08:26:55+00:00): Фонтан не нужно подписывать "Фонтан"
DemoLogin (2020-03-06 10:12:24+00:00): Не отмечена парадная. Возможно ставит под сомнение всю нумерацию парадных в доме.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=59.84036&mlon=30.37909#map=19/59.84036/30.37909
d1g (2016-03-28 01:27:59+00:00): Привет! Нефтепроводы 274735361 и 310538008 задел, bbox большой получился  Если такого не избежать, то можно комментировать "под Хлебновкой"

Я бы отдельный пакет правок сделал чтобы разрезать длинные пути: маленькие bbox сильно помогают новичкам что происходит и историях понятная у объектов

В JOSM фильтрами ненужные объекты прятать, чтобы не цеплялись когда не хочешь https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Dialog/Filter

Ещё ключевое слово "modifed" подсвечивает изменённые объекты в фильтрах и в поиске
Gumeg (2016-03-28 07:30:30+00:00): Я когда рисовал аммиакопровод - резал его на кусочки по муниципальным районам. Забыл, что нефтепровод это такой большой отрезок. Уточнил его положение (по снимкам видны наземные элементы) и вот так вышло. Может порезать его? Например по границе областей хотя бы.
d1g (2016-03-28 08:19:54+00:00): Понятно, имеет смысл порезать только там, где будут править; т.е. внутри нас. пунктов (любого размера в принципе) и примечательных объектах вне их (если они встречаются).
rurseekatze (2018-03-15 21:28:01+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe gesehen, dass du das Hotel-Restaurant Paffhausen verschoben hast. Von der Adresse her war es an der vorherigen Position am Bahnhof korrekt platziert. Dort, wo es sich jetzt befindet, ist jedenfalls auch nicht die Bahnhofstraße. Gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund, warum du den Punkt verschoben hast?

Gruß
Alex
tschaggoman (2018-03-16 08:36:14+00:00): Hallo Alex,

danke für die Info. Das muss ein Fehler meinerseits gewesen sein.
Das befindet sich dort, wo es immer war.
rurseekatze (2018-03-25 16:08:10+00:00): Ich habe das Hotel wieder an die richtige Position verschoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57511362
Polarbear (2016-03-27 20:13:18+00:00): Hallo Tigerlilli, es ist sehr schön dass du Strassennamen korrigierst und hinzufügst. Wichtig ist aber auch zu wissen, woher die korrekten Namen stammen, deine Bearbeitungen sind ja recht großflächig?
Tigerlilli (2016-03-29 19:49:13+00:00): Hallo Polarbear, die Namen stammen von regio-osm.de und den beiden PDF-Dateien auf www.gemeinde-muldestausee.de/de/strassenverzeichnis.html. Außerdem war ich vor Ort und habe mir die Merkwürdigkeiten angeschaut bzw. Anwohner gefragt.
Polarbear (2016-03-29 22:07:25+00:00): Gut, es ist halt wichtig dass wir nur erlaubte Quellen verwenden, deshalb wäre es gut wenn du sie im Changeset-Kommentar angibst. Augenschein vor Ort ist natürlich am besten, dann mit "ground survey" kennzeichnen.
d1g (2016-03-31 07:34:32+00:00): Привет! Исправь после себя:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336621796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336621808
d1g (2016-03-31 07:51:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3436647262/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3436647263/history

По той частоте как ты их смещаешь, то в одну сторону, то в через день в другую ты сам не понимаешь что делаешь.

На местности ты конечно же не был, чтобы завялять что и как криво проходит, это понятно и по другим пакетам правок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38126420