piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
corfede (2020-01-06 10:39:41+00:00): Ciao Antonio, ti scrivo qui per segnalare alcune problematiche relative a questo ed altri changeset.
1) Gli edifici che abbiamo inserito con l'import della CTR Puglia, anche se datati (2006), sono posizionati correttamente (se nel frattempo non sono stati demoliti o modificati); quindi se nelle foto li vedi spostati, significa che sono sbagliate le foto e non gli edifici, quindi non devono essere modificati. In questa zona infatti le foto Bing (che sono di default lo sfondo di iD) sono molto sfasate. Per questo motivo dovresti o assegnare uno shift alle foto oppure usare un altro sfondo per disegnare, altrimenti anche la viabilità viene sfasata e modifichi erroneamente il lavoro di altri mappatori. Usando iD si possono cambiare le foto, ma se puoi usare JOSM avrai più funzionalità a disposizione.
2) Quando disegni i poligoni (es. landuse o natural) questi non devono essere collegati ai nodi delle strade, ma devono essere separati dagli stessi per lasciare libero lo spazio della carreggiata (ci sono alcuni video dimostrativi su come farlo al meglio, se vuoi posso girarteli).
3) Quando crei multipoligoni, se proprio questo è necessario, non puoi mettere come outer poligoni adiacenti tra loro.
Questi sono solo alcuni suggerimenti, ma se hai bisogno di chiarimenti possiamo tranquillamente sentirci.
Intanto ho sistemato alcune cose in questa zona (edifici, strade e alcuni poligoni separandoli dalle strade).
Ciao, Federico
AntonioDAmore (2020-01-06 10:54:09+00:00): Ciao Federico, capisco che sia stato un errore affidarmi alle foto di sfondo nella maniera in cui ho fatto io. Cercherò di approfondire sulla base delle indicazioni che mi hai dato in modo da non sbagliare in futuro. Se mi girassi i video sarebbe molto gradito, grazie!
corfede (2020-01-06 11:43:39+00:00): Certo, ti scrivo messaggio privato per i contatti.
iWowik (2019-11-23 21:01:11+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте!
Я заметил, что вы ставите адресную информацию, а ее обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы берете номера домов?
ralley (2019-08-12 07:43:27+00:00): Hi, you've managed to create this building as two seperate areas with a split down the middle which doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery.  Also most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners.  In ID the command "Square" (shortcut key: Q) will make the angles 90 degrees.
screwluse (2019-08-12 07:58:27+00:00): Thanks! This is consistent with my capacity to map that feature. If you have improved features, please add them.
screwluse (2019-08-12 08:01:04+00:00): Both areas match the descriptive feature, "Building" thanks for commenting however. In my view, it is you who is desiring of there to be a common feature with square corners to be labeled as "building" however, in this case, that was not what happened. But the feature is still designated as being a building.
screwluse (2019-08-12 08:02:37+00:00): If you are more skilled at mapping buildings, please do so.
screwluse (2019-08-12 08:03:21+00:00): Thanks!!!
I_G (2019-08-13 06:58:44+00:00): Have you been there?
rubasov (2019-08-13 07:24:09+00:00): Yes, twice so far. Parts of the trail may be hard on people with a fear of heights. In muddy or icy conditions there's some chance of falling too. The warning is at the south end of the trail. I don't have the exact coordinates, but it can't be missed when approaching the trail from Pilisszentlaszlo. I also may have a photo of it somewhere on my hard drive.
I_G (2019-08-13 08:11:49+00:00): Well if you've been there I'm surprised you've found it demanding, it's well below that. Forget that BS health&safety warning, they just cover their arses.
rubasov (2019-08-13 08:36:33+00:00): In good weather I did not find it demanding at all. I thought the SAC scale is also about the possible risks. For example I'd not take that trail when it's icy. If you think I misunderstood the SAC scale feel free to correct me and revert this change.
I_G (2019-08-13 09:34:19+00:00): Most mountain paths get quite worse after heavy rain or with ice cover. Personally, based on the OSM Wiki I use level 2 for paths with gradient > 20-25% and/or difficult surface (rocks) and occasional need of using hand to overcome obstacles...
rubasov (2019-08-13 10:33:52+00:00): Funny, I looked at the same wiki page to decide if this is the proper category. Regarding the sign I was trying to follow the principle of "map what's on the ground". Anyway, I'm really not adamant on T2. I'm quite new around here, if this trail is not conventionally T2, don't hesitate to revert.
user_5359 (2019-08-12 04:09:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712697255 without any keys. Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. Please revert your changes. You also use an older version of iD.
Hjart (2019-08-12 15:10:30+00:00): I think generally only buildings build as churches should be tagged as such
fmarier (2019-08-12 17:25:55+00:00): Hi npgc, it looks like you and Matthew are both modifying the phone numbers in different ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56205824

which according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone?uselang=en#Usage are both valid (ITU NANP).
pio2_122 (2019-08-11 23:05:30+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś ten budynek? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693967947

Po tym, że nie widnieje on na Ortofotomapie z 2017, również na archiwalnej (z 2008 i 2012), ani na skanie ze starej mapy topograficznej, wnioskuję, że jest nowy.
Budynek naniosłem zgodnie z danymi z SIP-u Miasta, który jest dość wiarygodny (aktualny).

Byłeś na miejscu i faktycznie stwierdziłeś brak budynku (lub jego budowy) czy usunąłeś obrys patrząc na starą Ortofotomapę (obecna jest z 2017)?
JulesGabrielVerne (2019-08-12 23:15:53+00:00): Byłem na miejscu. W zasadzie zdecydowana więkoszość moich poprawek jest po lokalnej wizycie. Czasem jednak nanosząc swoje poprawki robię też coś "w ciemno" na podstawie zdjęć. Może w tym wypadku też coś pomyliłem, jednak nie wiem jaki budynek masz na myśli. Jesteś w stanie podać link z pinezką?
pio2_122 (2019-08-13 11:06:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.34978&mlon=14.74579&zoom=4#map=19/53.34980/14.74580

http://geoportal.szczecin.pl:9090/gpt4/?permalink=21256131

Dobrze o tym wiem - zauważyłem ślad GPS, który wysłałeś :D I właśnie obawiałem się, że zrobiłeś to przy okazji patrząc tylko na zdjęcia. Nie odbieram tego jako wandalizm, tylko zwykłą pomyłkę lub nawet użyteczną poprawkę - chodzi tylko o potwierdzenie informacji.
eginhard (2021-11-03 10:40:02+00:00): Hallo hanskuster,
Ich sehe du hast den Binnenkanal mehrmals als Bach markiert, hat das einen bestimmten Grund? Soweit ich sehe (z.B. Wikipedia oder auf der offiziellen Seite: https://binnenkanal.ch/geschichte/) wurde er Ende 19. Jahrhundert gebaut, somit wäre waterway=canal passender.
Gruss,
eginhard
hanskuster (2021-11-03 20:06:18+00:00): Hallo eginhard,
gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dcanal ist das KEIN Kanal. Ein Kanal ist für Transport oder Abluss einer Turbine, etc.
Umgangssprachlich nennt man ihn hier Binnenkanal. Der Binnenkanal ist zur entlastung des Rheines und führt Grundwasser ab.
Gruss, hanskuster
eginhard (2021-11-04 07:47:19+00:00): Der Hauptunterschied in OSM ist, dass canal wie hier künstlich angelegte und stream/river natürliche Wasserläufe sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Awaterway
Die genaue Nutzung ist weniger relevant und kann mit usage= angegeben werden.
hanskuster (2021-11-04 20:09:16+00:00): Dann müsste nach Wikipedia jeder begradigte Fluss oder Bach als canal getaggt werden.
Der Binnenkanal ist teilweise natürlich, ursprünglich der alte Rhein.
eginhard (2021-11-05 20:52:39+00:00): Genau, bei St. Margrethen mündet der Kanal in den Alten Rhein, der dann korrekt als waterway=river eingetragen ist. Auch das begradigte Rheinstück bei Diepoldsau ist natürlich kein Kanal. Aber ich habe noch einmal nachgeschaut (https://s.geo.admin.ch/941d2fae63), im ganzen Verlauf des Binnenkanals gab es vor 1890 kein natürliches Gewässer, alles floss quer in den Rhein. Deshalb würde ich vorschlagen den Kanal demnächst in waterway=canal zu ändern.
Baloo Uriza (2019-08-12 02:04:21+00:00): Permissive, so it's open to the public unless the owner kicks you out, similar to a shopping mall concourse?  If it's only open to residents, private would be more appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73250844
birdlawyer (2019-08-13 16:25:52+00:00): Hello Razor74,  I noticed you mentioned me in this changeset and wanted to learn more about your data concerns here.
Vladimír Domes (2019-08-11 21:19:04+00:00): Changeset comment: Updating maxspeed, tracing buildings and fixing useless "forward" suffix on oneway.
Rom1 (2019-08-14 06:46:38+00:00): Bonjour, cette aire de jeux n'existe vraiment plus ? Merci.
jemappellenicolas (2019-08-14 15:12:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Depuis bien longtemps, les jeux ont été déplacés aux deux autres aires de jeux.
Leo Slager (2019-08-13 22:27:55+00:00): Hallo JJJWegdam,
Er staat hier een lijn zonder tags.
Ik vermoed dat dat de barrier=wall moet zijn. Hij valt samen met landuse=meadow.
Die heb ik even losgemaakt zodat je hem makkelijk kunt vinden. Pal Z van Schelluinen West
JJJWegdam (2019-08-14 09:08:16+00:00): Hallo Leo,
Hier ben ik dezer dagen inderdaad aan het editen. Ik was er van op de hoogte dat deze lijn per abuis was blijven staan. Beetje coulance zou fijn zijn 😬
Leo Slager (2019-08-14 09:15:12+00:00): Die coulance verdien je zeker.
Dus heb ik niets verwijderd.
Maar ik kwam hem tegen in OSMinspector, dus ik dacht ik zal je even informeren.
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:57:25+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
aweech (2019-08-12 20:44:44+00:00): Hi! I noticed that you incorrectly changed the name of Stadium Station in Salt Lake City and added a lot of fords that aren't real in this changeset. This is a very large changeset which makes it difficult to find and correct all the mistakes. Please remember to keep changesets small and only add things to the map that are real!
Kuatsystems (2019-08-12 20:53:34+00:00): i am so sorry, i thought i was helping, thanks for the feedback, let me know if there is anything i can do help out.
aweech (2019-08-12 21:01:04+00:00): Most of your edits were good! Those were the two big things I noticed wrong. I fixed the fake fords in City Creek mall, just keep an eye out.
Kuatsystems (2019-08-12 21:02:55+00:00): thanks, i think i got too ambitious and did it by accident. 
thanks for fixing it :)
F-5 System (2019-08-12 13:23:31+00:00): Здравствуйте, Максим, я понимаю, что на первый взгляд может показаться, что я присваиваю памятникам неприличные имена, что может выглядеть как вандализм и оскорбление. Однако, во-первых, источником этих народных названий для меня послужил известный серьёзный научно-популярный сайт nplus1.ru который публикует обзоры научных статей и просветительских материалов. Считаю, что народные названия, указанные на нём были ими проверены и действительно используются жителями городов где установлены эти памятники. Во-вторых, названия вписаны мною в тег loc_name (локальное имя), где указываются неофициальные "народные" названия объектов, исторически сложившиеся у жителей. После обсуждения в телеграмм-чате с коллегами-мапперами верный ли я использовал тег для обозначения, и не считают ли они мою правку целенаправленным вандализмом, считаю, что мою правку можно вернуть. Верните, пожалуйста, мою правку. Спасибо
freeExec (2019-08-12 13:32:55+00:00): Питер, Не резиновая и Ёбург тоже вносить будете?
literan (2019-08-12 17:21:49+00:00): Я бы Питер точно внес. Любопытно, поиском по этому слову номинатим Санкт-Петербург показывает (хотя в тегах его нет)
az09 (2019-08-12 19:19:43+00:00): попробуйте обойтись викидатой. или даже написать пару строк в википедию про эти "имена". хотя на 99% уверен, что и там откатят. некоторые вещи пусть остаются уделом статей в жж, а не геобазы.
literan (2019-08-12 19:47:17+00:00): мое мнение - прозвища эти глупые и пошлые. Но они есть в реальности, подтверждаются авторитетными источниками, а значит, вполне могут быть отражены в OSM.
mosstreet (2019-08-12 20:26:44+00:00): Согласен с literan, если считать OSM проектом для людей, то и разговорные названия нужно вносить, есть же alt_name. В рамках приличия конечно. Слово из трех букв, к примеру, "плохое" слово только сейчас и его смысл в прошлом  скорее всего был другим.
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:57:57+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT ke9tv-NYSDEC-import
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:58:09+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
viloan (2019-08-11 23:38:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:58:26+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
FrankOverman (2019-08-20 20:49:41+00:00): Route 50-60 moet m.i. niet aangebracht worden. Ik denk dat op paal RWN-50 foutief verwezen wordt naar 60. Immers, op paal RWN-60 wordt niet terug verwezen naar 50. Zie ook https://www.visitbrabant.com/nl/routes/wandelen
FrankOverman (2019-08-20 20:50:42+00:00): Nu is er een melding op kpn:
https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/route/9908124
FrankOverman (2019-08-20 20:53:05+00:00): BTW, ik heb foto's gemaakt van de RWN paaltjes en daar check ik nu op.
Andre Engels (2019-08-24 04:22:35+00:00): Bedankt voor de mededeling, maar ik hoop dat je het niet erg vindt als ik deze aan jou laat om verder te behandelen / op te lossen. Wel bedankt voor de link - ik zie dat in mijn eigen woonplaats ('s-Hertogenbosch) een beetje een gat vormt in een behoorlijk goed gevuld netwerk, daar ga ik binnenkort maar eens mee bezig, denk ik.
FrankOverman (2019-08-24 06:41:05+00:00): OK, komt in orde, ik fix het.
FrankOverman (2019-08-24 07:07:02+00:00): Route 50-60 is verwijderd
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:58:48+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
nevw (2019-08-12 00:59:51+00:00): Hi
just for info there is a way to square up the buildings you map in iD editor.
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
mueschel (2019-08-22 17:40:43+00:00): Hi,
you added two nodes with the tags
amenity = letter_box
  mail:outgoing = yes
This seems a bit strange - if it's a lettter box, there should be an address. Otherwise it should be tagged as amenity = post_box

Jan
m86 (2019-08-22 18:02:37+00:00): This specific one (node 6701735742) is a shared private cluster mailbox for tenants in a section of this shopping center - there are multiple addresses associated with it, though, also a slot for outgoing mail. I was not sure what the best way of tagging it would be, but I would consider it more so a letter box than a post box (high capacity, public).
mueschel (2019-08-22 18:21:54+00:00): Alright then. I don't think we have a proper tag for this.
Maybe the best is to have two nodes.
m86 (2019-08-22 18:26:33+00:00): The outgoing mail tag really isn't important - omitting it and just tagging it as a letter box would be fine
user_5359 (2019-08-12 03:55:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please read an understand my change set comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73246781!
user_5359 (2019-08-12 03:52:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I deleted the key description (again) because it contains unwanted advertising. The business is sufficiently described with craft=paver, the advertisement from the website does not have to be fetched as a teaser here again.
mavl (2019-08-12 15:02:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были добавлены адреса?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:30:31+00:00): Здравствуйте,  pain_black!
К сожалению вы не ответили на комментарий к этому пакету правок.
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:58:38+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
viloan (2019-08-12 01:59:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
user_5359 (2019-08-12 03:43:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why didi you add an overlappinhg industrial landuse? Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386642204 ?
user_5359 (2019-08-12 03:46:32+00:00): Short hint to the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388529911: If there are two shops in one building, create two points in the building and describe the shops separately.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Carlos Brys (2019-08-12 21:44:55+00:00): Eliminé el nodo que creaste, porque la guardería ya estaba creada
Es una buena costumbre comentar los cambios para que otros editores sepan lo que hacemos
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:58:58+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:07+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295