piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-03-10 15:10:05+00:00): Bij de zuidelijke Goorsestraat zit wat in de knoop. Ik kijk even. Dit was je edit.. dan kun het goed zien. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57059113
rkoebrugge (2018-03-10 15:17:30+00:00): Die zuidelijke goorsestraat is nieuw aangelegd en gaat naar een boerderij. Deze klopt dus wel.
eggie (2018-03-10 15:34:54+00:00): Er zat een lus in de Goorsestraat .. Je kunt het nu nog zien renderen, maar in werkelijkheid is het gerepareerd. Kijk even in achavi.. dan kun je het zien.
eggie (2018-03-10 15:38:48+00:00): Het was op de kwuising Goorsestraat / Dekkersweg.
Oorzaak is het vervelende plakken van nodes in editor iD. 
Tip: linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :)
eggie (2018-03-10 15:44:32+00:00): De stukje fietsroute 10 en 11 liggen nu links van de kruising. Met iD kun je geen fietsroutes bewerken... dus ik heb het even met JOSM gedaan.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:07:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
BER319 (2018-03-26 07:42:21+00:00): Hallo Q5HX9

barrier=Bauzaun gibt es nicht. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5469304416

Bitte benutze das Wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier?uselang=de

um den Richtigen Wert zu finden.

Viele Grüße
BER319
eggie (2018-03-10 19:26:55+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk en OSm wel in het bijzonder.  Hier heb je de Rietmolen vastgeplakt aan het weiland, maar ook per abuis een weg op een weg geplakt. Dat is dat gele korte stuk vlakbij nr 10a
ik maak het even los en haal de duplicate way eraf.. Loopt de Rietmolen echt nu anders in een nieuw tracee?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57059560
eggie (2018-03-10 19:34:03+00:00): Ik heb je even geholpen. De duplicate verwijderd.. en de weg losgemaakt van de landuse. 
Tip: linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :)
eggie (2018-03-10 15:06:27+00:00): Dag rkoebrugge. 'k Heb even wat losse eindjes aan elkaar geknoopt zodat alles weer routeert. tag junction= roundabout toegevoegd. De weg gespiltst vanaf de rotonde. 
Tip: pak steeds even een node "beet" en kijk of de rest ook meekomt bij verschuiven.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:04:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
viloan (2018-03-10 14:48:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-03-10 14:59:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
KTim (2018-03-10 15:22:07+00:00): Why are these fantasy ways? They are clearley visible on Strava.
archie (2018-03-10 15:43:44+00:00): Strava ist hier nicht maßgebend. Den neuesten schwedischen - offiziellen - Karten zufolge, gibt es diese Wege nicht. Und hier sprechen wir vom allerneuesten Material.
KTim (2018-03-10 15:45:34+00:00): Welche Karten sind dies und sind diese für OSM nutzbar? Du hast hier als Quelle nur Bing angegeben.
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 16:42:09+00:00): Вечер добрый.  
Все три эти правки с высотами придется откатить. Поясняю почему:  
1. Основная причина описана в статье https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele#Basics :  
* "elevations are only recorded for features where they are significant"  
* "you should not tag elevation of nodes with no other tags"  
1.1. При этом вы пишите, что данные о высотах взяты в GPS, такие значения нужно записывать не в ele=, а в ele:WGS84=  
2. Вписали вы их в тег name=, который сам себе не основной, а дополнительный к другим тегам. Да и не название это никакое, не нужно использовать этот тег для других целей (про это есть соответствующая статья в вики).
4b696d (2018-03-16 15:43:07+00:00): Why are you tagging squares as parks and why are you connecting them to the highways?
leisure=park is definitively the wrong tag here. I will revert your changesets.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:25:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
DaCor (2018-03-10 17:41:31+00:00): Many thanks for your edits in this area. As you can see, there are a lot of gaps in this area of Dublin so anything you can add is much appreciated by the local community
viloan (2018-03-10 15:31:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartonage (2018-03-10 16:57:46+00:00): Hallo,

vielleicht bist du dir dessen nicht bewusst, aber deine Eintragung über Maps.me erscheint auf OpenStreetMap öffentlich einsehbar. Und natürlich gibt es hier auch kein Schloß mit dem Namen 'zuhause'. (Mehr Informationen zu OSM hier: https://www.openstreetmap.de/faq.html#was_ist_osm) Für eigene Lesezeichen gibt es eine dementsprechende Funktion in Maps.me.
Diesen Eintrag habe ich aus dem Grund entfernt.

Schöne Grüße
Leo Slager (2018-03-10 23:02:28+00:00): Dat ziet er heel netjes uit.
Владимир К (2018-03-23 10:02:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5370718822 вот тут светофоры неверно немного обозначены. переходы надо обозначать highway=crossing+crossing=traffic_signals, а  highway=traffic_signals только один раз на пересечение дорог перекрестка.
us2ivb (2018-03-24 09:06:03+00:00): Посмотрите, теперь правильно?
muralito (2018-03-11 00:29:22+00:00): Hola.

¿En este local hay internaciòn o solo atención ambulatoria?
user_4493657 (2018-04-02 11:29:59+00:00): Witam. możesz udowodnić że w Kąsiniowie jest pałac, a nie nieczynna gorzelnia?
Ja mam takie dowody że tam była gorzelnia.
1. https://postimg.org/image/adfl4hrq3/ (http://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/?gpmap=gp0&actions=acShowServices_KATASTER)
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCK0FVL0sjo (możliwe że to w Kąsinowie)
3. pałace, dworki itd. często mają kominy fabryczne?
Omnific (2018-03-10 22:05:22+00:00): A lot of this is outdated. Please stop adding if not certain. I will be reverting section of this.
fluffy_unicorn (2018-03-11 08:11:01+00:00): Thank you for noticing the current situation in the area. It is important to have data based on local knowledge. I want to turn your attention to the fact that I am using Mapbox Satellite imagery as it is the most up-today imagery available (updated at the end of 2017) and GPX data. I would appreciate if you could add Mapillary or OpenStreetCam sequence to reassure the correctness of data input in order for other mappers to have more precise data and not to make same mistakes. In case if you have references to other data sources relating to the area available online it would be nice to share them with the OSM community. Kind regards.
openamap (2018-04-24 00:44:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568528415
について
name=都市美形成建築物
となっていますが、nameは名称を入力します。
nameでしたら岡村邸になると考えます。

都市美形成建築物は尼崎市が指定する建物の分類になります
http://www.city.amagasaki.hyogo.jp/kurashi/siminsanka/tosibi/074_tsys/074_tsys2.html
今の所OSMに都市美形成建築物の分類は有りませんので、
historic=manor
と
heritage=7
heritage:operator=尼崎市
description=都市美形成建築物
が適していると考えます

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:heritage?uselang=ja
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging#Boundary
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:29:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
wateryworld (2018-03-10 16:52:32+00:00): description of changes is incorrect - added a portion of the west river between the blackstone confluence and rt 16 and updated/added some points around Rice City Pond
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
FreierFriese (2018-03-11 14:46:28+00:00): Moin PCfreak98, erstmal vielen Dank für Deine Bearbeitungen und herzlich Willkommen bei der OSM! Leider haben sich in dem Änderungssatz via wheelmap.org Fehler eingeschlichen. Punkte wurden doppelt erfasst (zum Beispiel Müller Leer) und dann auch noch teils an einem falschen Ort!
Beispiel: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5469617121

Scheint ein Problem der wheelmap zu sein.

Falls du es nicht selbst korrigieren möchtest, werde ich in nächster Zeit einmal drüber schauen. Viele Grüße!
Tournesol666 (2018-03-10 17:45:03+00:00): Sorry, no fire hydrant added here. But "just" the main entrance and the main exit of the IKEA Hognoul building !
trigpoint (2018-03-10 18:11:44+00:00): Hi, I am not sure I understand why you have changed this? The wiki says stations can be mapped as areas or nodes.
johnpercy (2018-03-10 18:37:17+00:00): True for standard railway stations but the Wiki says that light rail (and subway) stations should be mapped as nodes only.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dlight_rail
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dsubway
trigpoint (2018-03-10 19:29:22+00:00): The wiki is intended to document how mappers map, it is not a set of instructions and should be taken with a large pinch of salt.

Mapping evolves over time and I suspect this page has not been updated yet.

Whilst an underground station would be difficult to map as an area and a node is appropriate an above ground station can easily be defined as an area and provides a better map.
johnpercy (2018-03-10 19:33:39+00:00): I understand your point but what led me to this was finding that vector maps from OpenAndroMaps derived from OpenStreetMap data were following the wiki and so not identifying light rail stations that were not nodes.
trigpoint (2018-03-10 19:36:12+00:00): I have never heard of OpenAndroMaps, but they should update to reflect improved mapping. We should not tag for the renderer which changing these stations appears to be doing.
trigpoint (2018-03-10 19:37:21+00:00): Actually I am not actually sure why a light rail would be mapped differently to any other station.
johnpercy (2018-03-10 19:40:37+00:00): On, for example, paper maps such as the UK Ordnance Survey, light rail stations are indicated differently. That's probably a valid reason to make a distinction that can be used by renderers if they so wish, IMHO.
trigpoint (2018-03-10 19:42:43+00:00): Maybe they can be different, but that is no reason to hold back improvements in  mapping technique.
johnpercy (2018-03-10 19:43:56+00:00): OK, but I thought the wiki was meant to reflect the consensus
WoodWoseWulf (2018-03-10 21:11:10+00:00): Watch your building=yes tags on these schools - its not required from the entire grounds.
WoodWoseWulf (2018-03-10 21:18:44+00:00): Looking at your other edits, I think the tag you're looking for is amenity=school.
Fanny Dep (2024-11-25 09:48:46+00:00): Nœud : guichet remontée mécanique (5469604400)
Il n'y a plus de guichet à cet endroit mais des distributeurs de forfaits de ski
PT-53 (2018-03-11 08:52:50+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
nach Deiner Anpassung berdeckt dieser Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25014818 nun einen anderen Weg - siehe keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=98793656
Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?
Grüße
Hjart (2018-03-10 18:57:15+00:00): Hi. I've had a look at your changes here. Note in particular that I have reverted some changes to turn restrictions
Athalis (2018-03-11 11:02:24+00:00): Falscher Änderungssatzkommentar, sollte "Jügesheim: Details / Aktualisierung" sein
abakus_uploader (2018-03-10 23:31:05+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 19:39:41+00:00): Эти 20 правок так же были откачены.
Nick-Malvern (2018-03-10 18:52:06+00:00): I got this WRONG.
Please can you cancel this changeset.
Sorry!
freebeer (2018-03-11 19:16:58+00:00): This was done based on your forum post.
The edit looked simple enough you could have just deleted all your added tags in any editor like the iD you used, and change building back from church.
As I'm seeing pre-/post- tiles simultaneously, there was no geometry change or anything that could not be dealt with very simply, so next time, wait -- there won't be a next time now!
Nick-Malvern (2018-03-11 22:49:33+00:00): Many thanks -- I see you have done it for me.
I had just got similar advice elsewhere, I just thought (wrongly) that it could simply be 'undone' in one go.
I was actually going to reverse the changes as you suggest - originally I just lacked the confidence to do it (or realise that was how it had to be done).
Thanks again for the help/reassurance.
santamariense (2018-03-11 14:38:44+00:00): Os textos da wiki divergem entre si. O que tá valendo é o schemaBR2013 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Br-classification-flowchart-pt.png) + aprovação com elevação para trunk das BR-040; BR-364; BR-101; BR-116; BR-381 no ano de 2017.
.
Não analisei se está coerente com a tua edição. Apenas vi o comentário de changeset e decidi te inteirar do assunto.
.
A discussão das TOP 5 Trunk desencadeou uma longa discussão (em andamento). Como você gosta desta área ([re]classificação de vias), te sugiro participar ou pelo menos acompanhar as discussões se inscrevendo no tópico. Pois uma vez aprovada esta ou aquela decisão, o que vale é o que a maior parte da comunidade votar.
.
A discussão se dá em: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59392
rab (2021-12-25 09:58:31+00:00): hi, could you please check this way:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568521279/history

motor_vehicle=no is still in place

http://brouter.de/brouter/suspects
Bert Araali (2021-12-30 09:25:24+00:00): Hi rab, thanks for the tip. Road section is indeed in th meantime finished and open to motorvehicles. I changed the tagging. See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115554305.
Greetings and happy new year, Bert Araali
Mike Parfitt (2018-03-10 19:06:57+00:00): Typo : changed way to private based on road signs
OfferL (2018-03-10 19:07:38+00:00): הערב קטנה ביחס לעריכה שכרגע עשיתי:
אינני משוכנע שצורת הבנין היא כמו הפוליגון המופיע כאן, אבל את זה יוכלו לבדוק הגאונים הוותיקים שכאן..
ent8r (2018-03-15 16:54:21+00:00): Das sah in einem anderen Changeset und einer Notiz auch von dir noch GANZ anders aus ("Dieser Weg ist privat, hier ist eine Absperrung")... Warum änderst du so schnell deine Meinung? Warst du überhaupt vor Ort?
Gerhard1199 (2018-03-17 16:28:32+00:00): da war nicht dieser Weg gemeint, sondern der Weg zwischen Gärtnerstr. 26 und 27
mariotomo (2019-12-07 22:38:10+00:00): hola.  con esta edición has quitado el edificio 'Taxi Online' !
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 19:37:26+00:00): А именно: 57065079, 57065064, 57065029, 57064765, 57064658, 57064602, 57064187, 57064157, 57064132, 57064076, 57064055, 57063961, 57063927, 57063877, 57063814, 57063784, 57063743, 57063726, 57063685, 57063266
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-30 11:17:59+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1409855 ? Nie pamiętam tam takiego ograniczenia, ale może to jakaś nowość.
Javnik (2018-03-11 11:56:28+00:00): Witam :)
Budynek pod adresem Sokratesa 17b nie istnieje od jakichś 2-3 miesięcy...
Pozdrawiam,
Javnik
Piotr Strębski (2018-03-12 06:51:07+00:00): Haha, na budynki nie patrzyłem. Zrobię w weekend rekonesans terenowy i poprawię tamtą okolicę także od tej strony 😉 dzięki!
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-03-23 06:55:36+00:00): Ciao,
l'area camper non è sulla strada ma sarà a uno dei due lati; l'icona dovresti spostarla dove si trova effettivamente il park
user_5359 (2018-03-11 18:15:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 18:15:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:00:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 18:16:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Spanholz (2018-03-15 23:02:10+00:00): Servus, schau dir bitte mal diese Straße an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568319440 an. Da scheint was schief gelaufen zu sein in dem Changeset.
ulmtuelp (2018-03-16 06:58:29+00:00): Danke, ich die merkwürdige Ringstraße gelöscht, welche aber schon vor meinem Änderungssatz vorhanden war.
Spanholz (2018-03-16 10:38:14+00:00): Vielen Dank. Ich hatte gestern nur gesehen, dass sie von Dir zu letzt angefasst wurde. 

Schönes Wochenende. =)
user_5359 (2018-03-11 18:13:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:01:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:22:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
eggie (2018-03-10 21:30:40+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
Alan (2018-03-10 22:31:40+00:00): Hi George, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can't tell what you were trying to accomplish, since you didn't leave a very informative changeset message. It looks like you created an untagged line, so I went ahead and deleted that for you.
eggie (2018-03-10 21:33:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-10 21:36:02+00:00): Dag guitar_billy... vaak is het zo dat (brom)-fietsers uitgezonderd zijn van eenrichting. Is dat ook hier het geval?
dan toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no
Graag reactie.
guitar_billy (2018-03-10 21:45:46+00:00): Eggie, ik zal de bromfiets situatie controleren en dat expliciet toevoegen.
eggie (2018-03-10 22:00:52+00:00): Top!
guitar_billy (2018-03-12 09:00:29+00:00): eenrichting bijgewerkt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57103839