piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:22:42+00:00): Again fields.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:25:09+00:00): Fiction? name is tagged wrong, way goes across fields.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:27:00+00:00): ?
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:28:19+00:00): Middle of the sea?
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:39:56+00:00): Fiction.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:32:04+00:00): Fiction, and not very imaginative.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 08:38:37+00:00): You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.
All Best Wishes, Bernard
SomeoneElse (2016-12-18 23:28:44+00:00): @BCNorwich , see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1122 .
BCNorwich (2016-12-20 08:20:02+00:00): @SomeoneElse, Have you removed all the fiction? As I usually follow up what I comment on.
Regards
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 09:13:51+00:00): @BCNorwich http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLz finds couple of nodes created in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44483642 - that probably needs looking at to see what joins were created there.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:57:15+00:00): Corrected comment: [Parañaque, Las Piñas, Muntinlupa, Cavite, and Laguna] add fixme to unnamed schools, correct names of some schools, retag schools that are actually buildings
woodpeck (2016-12-18 21:01:51+00:00): Dear user Geozeisig, you have been told not to make mechanical edits like this in the past. Please adhere to these rules. It is not plausible that you have indeed looked at the objects you modified here individually because some of them contain other tagging inconsistencies that you have not fixed.
geozeisig (2016-12-19 09:06:10+00:00): position=underground ist der falsche Tag. Karten die das auswerten sollen können damit nichts anfangen. Steht auch so in der Wiki
Gruß
Sanniu (2016-12-18 10:48:15+00:00): Please add footpath tag to new way.
Also, if you adding Cyrillic street-name in address, add Cyrillic name to street itself
zstadler (2017-03-27 09:09:12+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460280155
has no tags. What is it?
nammala (2017-01-25 06:25:47+00:00): Hi mmclougherty,

Thanks for your interest in adding data to OpenStreetMap. The data you have added bus_stops doesn't make sense with the names you have provided. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset. 

Regards,
nammala
Hjart (2016-12-18 09:08:27+00:00): Vi kunne også have reverteret sletningen. Dette er ofte interessant i forhold til at bevare historikken.
osmviborg (2016-12-18 09:35:00+00:00): Tak for tip. Har lige installeret JOSM/Plugins/Reverter, skulle det blive nødvendigt.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-18 10:22:00+00:00): Kunne være en fin lejlighed til så at prøve princippet med revertering i JOSM, altså revertere ch.set. 44480908 med sletningen af den gamle adressenode, og en letoverskuelig opgave. Den genfremkomne node vil have alle (special)tags og historikken endnu. Bagefter kan 4559609454-erstatningsnoden så slettes, hvis (når) det er gået godt.
Hjart (2016-12-18 10:24:46+00:00): Asger har helt ret. Det kan være godt lige at bruge situationen her til at blive dus med processen.
osmviborg (2016-12-18 10:30:54+00:00): 44480908  tilbageført. Det virkede upåklageligt.
BeKri (2016-12-18 16:22:50+00:00): Hallo eho,
sorry, aber das Haus heißt sicher nicht "Kleiner Prinz", das ist höchstens der Phantasiename eines "Projektentwicklers", bitte rausnehmen.
Warum trägst Du erneut die Adressdaten ein, die bereits als Node eingetragen sind ?
Das Haus ist nicht NUR 37 sondern auch 37a.
Gruss derBeKri
eho (2016-12-18 18:45:00+00:00): Habe den Hausnamen entfernt, er wird tatsächlich so nicht genutzt. Der vorher eingetragene Name (Grahn Apartements) wurde ebenfalls nicht genutzt.
Zum Mapping von Gebäuden mit mehreren Hausnummern gibt es keinen Konsens, ich habe die zweite Hausnummer ergänzt.
eho (2016-12-18 19:04:52+00:00): Die Hausnummern wurden ohne Hausnamen zusätzlich zu den Entrance Hausnummern angezeigt, daher habe ich sie nun entfernt. Ist zwar "Mapping für den Renderer", aber alles andere wäre unschön.
BeKri (2016-12-19 06:54:20+00:00): Hallo eho, Danke für Deien Änderungen.
Als Mapping für den Renderer würde ich es nicht bezeichnen, den letztlich wären die Adressdaten doppelt eingetragen, was eher vermieden werden sollte.
Bei Gebäuden mit zwei Nummern kann man
1. Nodes setzen, dann braucht der Umriss aber nicht auch noch die addr. Daten, wäre für eine Adresse doppelt gemoppelt.
2. den Umriss unterteilen (wenn man weiß wo) und beide Umriss taggen.
Es bleiben eh genug doppelte Einträge bei adrr-Eintrag am Gebäude und Läden oder POI im Gebäude.
Gruss und happy tagging
derBeKri
GerdP (2017-08-25 09:43:40+00:00): Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf highway=driveway
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187984572
Mal abgesehen davon das es hw=service + service=driveway sein sollte:
auf Mapbox sieht es so aus, als ob der Weg durchgeht bis https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460251204
Dann wäre es wohl ein einziger hw=track
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
Vort (2016-12-21 09:34:38+00:00): Добрый день. Этой правкой были созданы два объекта с тегами amenity=fountain, но при этом с подписью "ліх.". Так что же это - фонари или фонтаны? (Кстати, в данном случае подписи ставить не надо. Тега достаточно. Только правильного тега)
andygol (2016-12-21 10:30:31+00:00): - Vort, якщо орієнтуватись на опис до цього набору  змін - то "ліхтарі"

- Светлана Котенко, підписувати об'єкти таким чином не треба - треба правильного застосовувати теґи.
mavl (2016-12-19 11:35:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OpenStreetMap используется строгая лицензия. Можно использовать только свои собственные знания или разрешённые источники данных. Компания 2ГИС не давала разрешения на использование своих данных в проекте OpenStreetMap, поэтому все изменения, сделанные вами в этом пакете правок, отменены. Пожалуйста, не используйте больше данные из 2ГИС и других карт и веб-сервисов (например, карты Гугл, Яндекс-карты).  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright  
«Напоминаем участникам сообщества OSM, что добавление данных из любых защищённых авторским правом источников (например, с Google Maps или печатных карт) не должно проводиться без явного предварительного согласия правообладателей.

Если вы считаете, что защищённый авторским правом материал был неправомерно добавлен к базе OpenStreetMap или к этому сайту, пожалуйста, обратитесь к нашей процедуре изымания или непосредственно на нашу вебстраницу регистрации.»  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ
tyr_asd (2016-12-18 18:59:14+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the updates! One suggestion, though: could you please use more descriptive changeset comments instead of "gbf" (or some other gibberish). That would be very much appreciated by your fellow mappers!

Best and happy mapping! :)
luschi (2016-12-22 20:31:47+00:00): Prevedeno:
Hi. Hvala za posodobitve! Eden od predlogov, čeprav: lahko uporabite več opisnih seznam sprememb, pripombe, namesto "GBF" (ali kakšno drugo žlobudranje). To bi bilo zelo cenijo vaši kolegi izdelovalci zemljevidov!

Najboljša in vesel kartiranje! :)
sq7obj (2016-12-21 21:22:53+00:00): Czy jesteś w stanie wskazać źródło wg którego rysujesz przebieg tej linii tramwajowej? Nie kojarzę żeby była oficjalna propozycja takiej rozbudowy.
santamariense (2016-12-18 14:23:36+00:00): Esses Pontos de Interesse que você adicionou não são de fato postos de combustíveis né?

Aproveito o gancho para perguntar aos colegas como se deve mapear locais onde vendem gás de cozinha?
naoliv (2016-12-18 18:12:04+00:00): É shop=gas para os locais que vendem gás de cozinha
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgas
santamariense (2016-12-18 18:26:51+00:00): Obrigado. Vou incluir isso na minha lista de tarefas para revisar em Santa Maria. Tem ideia se existe definição de como mapear mercado que vende gás também?
naoliv (2017-06-18 20:33:38+00:00): Desculpa a demora em responder (estou tentando tirar o atraso infinito das minhas pendências infinitas).
Então, isso é algo que eu gostaria de ter: uma especificação melhor dos locais.
Por exemplo, alguns mercadinho possuem açougue, outros não.
Da forma atual não vejo um jeito de representar esses detalhes menores.
Acho que seria o caso da gente estudar uma proposta para especificar melhor alguns tipos de locais (se vende/possui gás, açougue, padaria, etc).
chrsmsk (2016-12-21 08:55:59+00:00): Wurden die Bäume vom Windwurf beseitigt und der Weg neu freigesägt?
tyr_asd (2016-12-18 19:07:16+00:00): why did  you delete a whole bunch of objects in this changeset? For example, some waterways and the nature-reserve area are now missing. Is this a mistake? (If yes: I can help you restore the data, if you need help.)
luschi (2016-12-19 23:58:30+00:00): @ZigiMigi1103: please stop deleting these data again.     
Can you send us some info, why you think that this area is not correct.
thx
tyr_asd (2016-12-23 13:08:47+00:00): @ZigiMigi1103: I've just reverted all your edits in this area, after talking to the operator of the skiing area. Your additions and deletions do not reflect the reality on the ground. For example, there is no Biathlon Center here, neither are there plans to construct one.

Please don't map stuff that doesn't exist in reality. Thank you.
Seandebasti (2017-01-04 18:50:26+00:00): sorry its #irq not #usa
also for the following sets
my mistake
tyr_asd (2016-12-18 19:18:11+00:00): Hi. Here, you draw some polygons, but did't put any tags on it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460336616

What do they represent?
eggie (2017-04-02 17:24:32+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit,,
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
ali bijani (2017-04-02 17:29:22+00:00): i dont remember which modification it was?

but did i do something wrong ?
eggie (2017-04-02 19:12:15+00:00): Everyone gets a  "welcomes-message"  :) 
I checked your edit now. You deleted not only the shop but allso the address-node. 
That was wrong so please do'nt delete the address-info in the future, only the name and shop. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44491401
eggie (2017-04-02 19:17:53+00:00): I fixed this address-node. Don't worry about it. :)
geri-oc (2016-12-22 16:11:14+00:00): Steinbrüche:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dquarry
stillgelegt=> disused=yes

Bitte erst nachsehen, wie etwas gemappt wird:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite?uselang=de
PierZen (2020-11-16 17:30:56+00:00): Have you verified in the field ? Let's dream - We should go canoing to test  :)
derFred (2020-11-16 17:55:02+00:00): yes, we should ;-)
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-19 08:30:24+00:00): Hi Beeers, please do not enter empty tags ""="". Thanks, Alex
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-19 13:43:17+00:00): Hi, in this changeset, ways 84367714 and 84367782 have had their pedestrian access removed. However, they appear to have regional walking route Lea Valley Walk running along them. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
user_5121 (2017-07-19 16:53:24+00:00): I'm sorry about breaking the relation for the route, I hadn't noticed that.

What I did notice when I walked here was that the public footpath does not go across that bridge as I had drawn it originally.  Instead the public footpath runs along the new way 460344329 that I created (the signpost on the street told me the correct location).  I removed the old foot access tags on the assumption that my original footpath tagging was incorrect.

I must admit that I don't know whether the Lea Valley Walk should follow the public footpath (which seems sensible) or follow the original bridge.  Since it approaches from the south along the road I guess the public footpath makes more sense.

Shall I change it or will you?
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-20 16:16:49+00:00): H, thanks for the info. I have moved the Lea Valley Walk to go along the public footpath.

Cheers,
Mike
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:39:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DD1GJ (2016-12-18 16:35:50+00:00): Hallo, dies ist ein Projekt zur Schaffung einer freien Weltkarte. Unsachgemäße "Marketing-Einträge" sind hier fehl am Platze und wurden bereits gelöscht.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 17:16:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which folk make lots of maps.
I just looked at your addition to OSM and there are some problems. You've somehow added an area on Ledborough Road, 600 feet long  0ft wide. The candle company does not exist in the middle of Wilton Road. Nor does it exist where it is mapped on Google. The registered office is at PO Box 1483, 53 Candlemas Mead, Beaconsfield, HP9 9BG. If the company has a physical existence here then this is where it should be mapped. If the company does not wish it's proper location to be known then it should not be mapped to OSM. I await your response.
Regards
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 08:41:15+00:00): No response from the mapper so the changeset has been reverted.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 17:29:10+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I point out that the building you've address tagged as number 19 is actually a pair of semi detached houses. The address would only apply to one house not both. The other buildings are semis as well. If you need help splitting the building please just ask. 
Regards
tyr_asd (2016-12-18 19:02:07+00:00): Hi! Why did you delete the stream (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368098211/history)? On aerial imagery it is well visible.
trigpoint (2016-12-20 17:07:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. What is actually here, is it a building or simply a signpost.
I imagine that you have made a typo and it is spelt Centre rather than the American way?
Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 18:09:36+00:00): I'm guessing that it's a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410268974 , actually.
vbth (2016-12-22 21:38:05+00:00): Hi, the place might be right but the name was only Cymraeg for village Hall. Also it was not visioble on the (offline) map. therefore i set an named it. Just give it a "i"-button an name it "Myddfai Community Hall & Visitor Centre". thanks.

http://www.myddfai.org/
SomeoneElse (2016-12-27 10:55:17+00:00): @vbth I wouldn't worry too much about what any particular map does or doesn't show, since they all show different things.  I've tried to merge everything together and added a building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462068160 .
vbth (2016-12-28 09:17:45+00:00): thank you.
mavl (2016-12-19 12:14:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок дома были непрямоугольными. Чтобы автоматически сделать углы линии прямыми, нужно в редакторе iD выделить линию (например, здание) и нажать клавишу S.
pyram (2016-12-24 13:36:24+00:00): Hallo,

die "Schneise 19" ist doch im nördlichen Bereich kein Tunnel?

Außerdem irritiert hier "track" in Verbindung mit access=no. Ist hier überhaupt ein befahrbarer (Wald-)Weg. Und wenn Ja - müsste der doch für forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr zulässig sein. Wenn nein - ist da denn überhaupt ein (Trampel-)Pfad?
Für reine Schneisen gibt es http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline
SomeoneElse (2017-01-04 21:42:50+00:00): Hello h-jo
Your source tag here says "transferred from Google".  We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. 
We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.
If you have any questions you can reply here, or you can email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse (2017-01-04 21:43:01+00:00): Hallo h-jo
Ihr Quelltag hier heißt "aus Google übertragen". Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Maps zu kopieren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_maps_from.3F für Details), so dass Sie aufhören müssen, dies sofort zu tun.
Wir (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) werden Ihre Änderungen durchlaufen und müssen Daten entfernen, die von Google hinzugefügt wurden. Dies kann einige Zeit dauern, aber bitte beachten Sie, dass Funktionen, die Sie von Google hinzugefügt haben, verschwinden.
Wenn Sie irgendwelche Fragen haben, können Sie hier antworten, oder Sie können die Daten-Arbeitsgruppe auf data@osmfoundation.org emailen.
Freundliche Grüße,
Andy Townsend
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-06 20:38:26+00:00): @SomeoneElse Nice! Didn't know that you can speak German :)
santamariense (2016-12-18 18:33:01+00:00): Você adicionou este lugar como uma guest_house (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guesthouse). É de fato uma guest_house
santamariense (2016-12-18 19:16:03+00:00): * É de fato uma guest_house
santamariense (2016-12-18 19:16:19+00:00): ?????
SK53 (2017-06-19 19:16:33+00:00): bridge=footbridge and highway=footway are not redundant. It provides extra information about the nature of the bridge: notably that it was solely designed for foot traffic, and is narrow. I am reverting this because you did not discuss it first, and you have removed information in changing the tag to yes.
geri-oc (2016-12-22 16:27:22+00:00): Was soll Furt auf einem gesamten Feldweg?
Woher sind die Koordinaten für den Verlauf der Wege?
Schneisen sind nicht unbedingt Wege.
Hjart (2016-12-18 18:18:43+00:00): Ændringen er vist heller ikke helt efter bogen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub og https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-12-18 18:23:35+00:00): Så skulle den være der! ID tab-completede på landuse/scrub, så jeg troede den var ok.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44074239, 44056401, 44054140, 44053119, 44073798, 44072483, 44056170, 44051828, 44056824, 44054669, 44073627, 44072594, 44071688, 44056743, 44054556, 44052835, 44055155, 44074120, 44074456, 44071744, 44053644, 44073491, 44072809, 44053737, 44073061, 44053284, 44055213, 44050966, 44051990, 44052141, 44050996, 44052296, 44056644, 44073929, 44052962, 44073673, 44052050, 44052459, 44053439, 44072125, 44052228, 44072404, 44074493, 44054447, 44054808, 44074680, 44050762, 44051619, 44052700, 44056120.
Hjart (2016-12-19 17:49:57+00:00): Noden er ændret. Det er muligt du lige vil have en snak med den skyldige.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-18 18:14:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44447564, 44447813, 44447862, 44450883, 44467734, 44467850.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-18 19:49:53+00:00): Force-reverting some further objects based on google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
Supaplex (2016-12-19 10:11:46+00:00): WOW, a big changeset. I thought I already revert some edit. So I miss something.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-19 17:15:38+00:00): Hi Supaplex,
To get the list I downloaded all the changesets from the user concerned, searched for all those that used google.cn imagery and reverted those.  I then looked at all the reversions that failed because of subsequent edits and force-reverted those.  In changesets such as this one.  It was those latter stages that changed more objects I think.
The root problem has been fixed in iD in https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3623 , and that will hopefully get rolled out onto osm.org soon.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 09:19:03+00:00): Hi,
Any reason for the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345706648/history in here?
Best Regards,
Andy
yzemaze (2016-12-20 11:06:12+00:00): I saw a turning_circle and mapped it. Maybe deleting the appendix was overzealous.
rab (2016-12-18 19:12:25+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Bachdurchfahrt mal etwas angepasst. Die Klassifizierung der Straßen sollte mehr nach Bedeutung als nach Aussehen erfolgen.
Eine grobe Richtschnur wäre: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Highway_Tag_Africa.
freebeer (2018-10-28 18:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63956969 where the changeset comment is: delete a bogus maps.me castle
Sanniu (2017-01-24 10:39:39+00:00): Relation: 1646887 - Missing tag or role on relation
sivan00 (2017-01-24 11:18:37+00:00): Not sure what the problem is.
Sanniu (2017-01-24 12:13:33+00:00): that relation doesn't have tags - e.g. name
sivan00 (2017-01-24 12:25:56+00:00): Since I have'nt created the relation (just cleaned up some of the borders), I'm not sure what needs ot be done.
Sanniu (2017-01-24 12:33:26+00:00): Ok, dug in history, there was KKL import with forest name that somehow wiped. I've updated type and name.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-22 09:06:48+00:00): Proszę nie psuć adresów, jak np. tutaj. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3789867595
D5B_SGW (2016-12-18 19:12:10+00:00): Sorry, falscher Bearbeitungskommentar. Richtig wäre:
"Bau abgeschlossen, Seniorenzentrum eröffnete im Herbst 2016"
trigpoint (2016-12-22 00:32:02+00:00): Is tourism really the correct tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460389218 ?
Aerial imagery suggest it is residental, rather than somewhere to go on holiday?
BeKri (2016-12-19 07:56:27+00:00): Geh Rainer, sei halt ned so ;-)))
Die Brunnen haben es unseren Leckts.me-Mappern irgendwie angetan ...
Da wurden ja schon "Produkte + Souvenirs" verkauft ...
Frage: Wie kommst Du zu der Übersetzung ?
Und was heißt der Eintrag "BMW总部及新产品展厅"
Danke und bis denn derBeKri
Rainero (2016-12-19 19:46:17+00:00): Ja stimmt, der Brunnen ist nicht zum ersten Mal veruntaggt worden ;)

Solche Texte werfe ich einfach in 
https://translate.google.com/#auto/de/ oder
http://www.online-translator.com/?prmtlang=de
Solange es keine längeren Texte mit komplizierterer Grammatik sind, kommt meist was verständliches raus.

Der im Olygelände heißt "BMW-Zentrale und neue Produkte". Definitiv kein Denkmal.

Fröhliches Aufräumen,
Rainer
mueschel (2016-12-23 21:03:45+00:00): Hi, 
I found the tag "true =A" on 9 ways - looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
trolleway (2016-12-24 21:39:35+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
Gh0stz0x (2016-12-26 12:22:56+00:00): Scusa, ma perché non hai messo il numero del sentiero sul ref? 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Italy/Sentieri
Grazie
Hjart (2016-12-18 21:25:03+00:00): Enden gør ikke meget gavn i forhold til navigation, når den bare hænger og dingler ved siden af bilvejen, så jeg har forbundet den dertil.
osmviborg (2016-12-19 12:18:58+00:00): Sker (måske) aldrig igen ;-)
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-31 14:38:08+00:00): reviewed (& reverted) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44568088
MKnight (2016-12-23 18:38:57+00:00): Moin, du hast hier offenbar ein Changeset oder Teile eines CS 2 Mal hochgeladen, siehe: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/byuser/?username=Ottonormalverbraucher&item=1230
magst Du das korrigieren?
Ottonormalverbraucher (2016-12-24 08:01:23+00:00): Hallo MKnight, ich habe den Benutzer czubi gebeten, meine Bearbeitungen der letzten 16 Tage komplett rückgängig zu machen, denn es gibt sowohl technische Probleme als auch inhaltlich wird Kritik geübt.
Ottonormalverbraucher (2016-12-25 11:35:55+00:00): abgesehen vom Diskussionsfortschritt habe ich die genannten Fehler behoben.