piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
TheNet1996 (2022-09-21 15:17:21+00:00): Hallo,

kleiner Hinweis bezüglich des Getränkemarktes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338283867

Bitte ändere shop=beverages in 
disused:shop=beverages um, wenn der Laden geschlossen wurde.

Der Name "Getränkemarkt" sollte dabei in old_name=Getränkemarkt geändert werden.

Danke & Viele Grüße
Mike
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
tux67 (2022-09-21 11:44:03+00:00): Hi,
idealerweise macht man das mit lifecycle tags. Also in diesem Falle disused:shop=kiosk
old_name=Tutus Kiosk
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix#Nicht-Nutzung_und_Verfall
So bleiben die Historiendaten erhalten, wenn da wieder was reinkommt - aber es wird nicht mehr gerendert / gefunden.

Gruß
tux67
krb100 (2022-09-21 12:15:02+00:00): Danke für den netten Hinweis!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Глеб (2022-09-21 22:02:09+00:00): Hello, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
The next time you are doing contributions, could you please consider to split you work in multiple changesets? (eg. one changeset per continent or country) It would make it easier for the community to navigate around contributions.
Thanks.
markbegbie (2022-09-22 01:30:06+00:00): Hi,
Sorry for the poor changeset, it honestly was not intentional.

I was using StreetComplete to provide updates on this occasion.  Without me knowing, it combined changes in the UK and NZ into one changeset.  (these relate to where I used to live and where I now live so are indeed based on survey and local knowlege).

I actually spent about 20 minutes last night trying to work out how to split the changeset that StreetComplete had created, or delete it and redo it as separate sets.

If you can tell me of a way to either split or delete the changeset that would be great.

I now have a better understanding of how StreetComplete manages submissions, and can avoid it happening in future (I hope).
julcnx (2022-09-22 08:04:18+00:00): Hi markbegbie, no worries, there is no way actually to delete or split a changeset that is already submitted to OpenStreetMap. Just make sure you have "Upload answers automatically" set to on in your StreetComplete settings menu. As long as you have an internet connection, each StreetComplete change will be uploaded separately. Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126456020
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 13:46:19+00:00): Ciao. Il sentiero 11C era già parzialmente presente nella relazione 6584086. Ciao, Amdrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 12:24:39+00:00): sì, questo è un caso particolare perché sulla relazione 6584086 c'è un operator che non sapevo se si estendesse su tutto il sentiero o solo su una parte. È un caso che ho in una lista di problemi da risolvere. Io non sono neanche sicuro se "operator" sulla relazione è il metodo giusto, forse l'operator del comune andrebbe sui singoli way? I sentieri secondo le mie informazioni sono gestiti dalla Regione Valle D'Aosta insieme al CAI, ma forse non è così o non è sempre così?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-24 12:26:36+00:00): Ciao. Che io sappia in Valle d'Aosta i sentieri sono gestiti dai comuni. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 12:33:05+00:00): Ho scritto all'autore dell'altra relazione per capire se forse tutto il sentiero è gestito da un unico gestore. In generale non sono molto convinto dell'idea di dover spezzare sentieri locali perché attraversono il confine di un comune. Ciao, Martin
mcliquid (2022-09-25 17:44:23+00:00): Von welchem Navigationssystem wird das nicht erkannt?
Ich würde es nur freundlich finden, wenn wir uns vorher absprechen, bevor hier nur "Tagging for the Renderer" betrieben wird.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lying_to_the_renderer

Hast du dir einen Termin gesetzt, dass du das access=no pünktlich wieder entfernst?
Robert2244 (2022-09-25 18:19:47+00:00): Servus mcliquid,
kurz zu dem wer wir sind, damit du evtl besser verstehst warum wir bzw ich das jetzt so wieder angepasst habe und warum du Dir keine Sorgen machen musst dass ich die Sperrung nicht wieder raus nehme. Wir sind hier das Verkehrsunternehmen direkt vor Ort und fahren hier mit einem digitalen On Demand System. Das heißt, wir sind darauf angewiesen, dass die Technik und Navigation passt. Wir haben schon einige Sachen in und um Murnau berichtigt. Nachdem leider dein Vorschlag auf den Navigationssystemen nicht wahrgenommen wurde und unsere Fahrer als auch Fahrgäste daher weiterhin Verspätungen im System hatten, haben wir es wieder auf access no gestellt. Wir sind aber auch die ersten, die wissen ( unsere Fahrer sind Mo-Fr von 6-20 Uhr im Gebiet in und um Murnau unterwegs) wann es wieder aufgehoben wird. Auch hier werden wir sofort wieder eine Veränderung vornehmen und alles wieder auf access yes stellen. Wie schon gesagt, wir sind da ja selbst von abhängig :-)
War nicht um dich zu ärgern, aber da drängt bei uns die Zeit.
VG Robert
mcliquid (2022-09-25 18:37:40+00:00): Hallo Robert,
vielen Dank für die ausführliche Antwort. Verständlich für mich.

Wüsstest du das Enddatum der Baumaßnahmen, sodass ich dies im BRouter hinterlegen kann, sodass der Suspect für die Zeit nicht mehr erscheint?

Und als generelle Verbesserung: Wäre es möglich, dass euer Navigationssystem auch conditional-restrictions unterstützt? Also quasi als "Feature Wish"?

Viele Grüße!
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2022-09-22 07:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126492651 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Martin Sheehan. Please use the developement API for testing! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Marc_ch (2022-09-21 10:46:09+00:00): Hello,
I think you are confusing village and municipality
according to the WP article in French, the locality still exists even if the communes have merged by 2x
in this case, changing the name of the village is wrong.
Regards,
Marc
Marco D S (2022-09-21 11:27:30+00:00): Thank you for your reply. I was actually missing "Grandsivaz" and was then doing research on it, only to find "Mannens-Grandsivaz" as an entity. Do you know how this could be resolved?
Marc_ch (2022-09-21 11:40:18+00:00): I added it a few min ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10042417443
Marco D S (2022-09-21 11:57:23+00:00): Thank you very much!
Marco D S (2022-09-21 11:59:07+00:00): ...and sorry for the mistake on my part.
george1201 (2022-09-22 06:04:03+00:00): Hallo Martin,
du hast hier sehr viele Busbahnhöfe auf eine Stelle hingesetzt. Einer würde reichen. Zu Freiburg kann ich jetzt nichts sagen, aber in Karlsruhe wundert mich auch die Position. Sie befindet sich im ECE-Center. Wenn es sich um eine Bushaltestelle handelt, sollte man deren konkreten Namen eintragen.
Nakaner (2022-09-22 07:51:46+00:00): Hallo,

der Busbahnhof beim ECE in Karlsruhe ist absoluter Quatsch. Ich bin ortskundig. Allein daran kann ich böse Absichten festmachen.

Am fehlenden created_by=*-Tag des Änderungssatzes und der Häufung der Nodes an exakt derselben Koordinate ist erkennbar, dass es sich hierbei um eine missbräuchliche Nutzung der produktiven Datenbank für Testzwecke mit einer qualitativ mangelhaften Software handelt.

Ich habe sämtliche Änderungssätze des Benutzers revertiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2022-09-21 19:28:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De niet bestaande building_passage heb ik ook verwijderd.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-25 14:56:05+00:00): Are you aware that stated source has "© 2021 All Rights Reserved"?

What is the license of imported data?

Where you discussed this import?

Have you followed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

If yes - when you posted message to imports mailing lists?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-26 16:19:34+00:00): It seems that link may be going to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nigerian_Energy_Support_Programme_(NESP)_II_Businesses_and_Facilities_Import
Emmanuel Jolaiya (2023-03-27 09:52:39+00:00): Kindly check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nigerian_Energy_Support_Programme_(NESP)_II_Businesses_and_Facilities_Import for import documentation
Dimitar155 (2022-09-21 17:43:44+00:00): Здравей REAKTOR,

Газовата връзка към Сърбия (виж https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057595975) съм я начертал от край до край включително и разклоненията ѝ, не е нужно да я дублираш.

Поздрави,
Митко
REAKTOR (2022-11-09 13:01:10+00:00): О да, ами по сателитите гледам, че и в Сърбия се строи и като дойде време да я начертая ще махна дубликата, така че да минем с един ченджсет.
user_5359 (2022-09-22 10:19:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove this SEO entry, because our supporter use the wrong keywords! Please see https://wiki.osm.org for the correct keywords. You can also ask for support, to correct your entry.
user_5359 (2022-09-24 06:16:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry because you use only foreign keys! Please read https://wiki.osm.org ! If yo need help, report here.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-21 10:40:21+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=32.566580%2C-84.910931%2C17.19
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
hatul (2023-08-21 15:45:24+00:00): בבקשה לתייג נכון, זו תצפית ולא אטרקציה
eggie (2022-09-21 19:34:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ReformSports® (2022-09-21 11:12:16+00:00): ReformSports® Sports Ground Construction Contractors & Artificial Grass Manufacturer
HellMap (2022-09-21 11:10:28+00:00): For reference https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124396404
MLOerli (2024-07-02 07:27:03+00:00): Buche gefällt im Mai 2024
ivanbranco (2024-07-02 07:52:43+00:00): If DeepL translated correctly, do you mean the tree no longer exists? Are you referring to this one?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9396311208

Is the tree stump still present? If so, it should be edited to natural=tree_stump. If the stump has also been removed, we can just delete the tree node.

Übersetzt mit DeepL:

Wenn DeepL richtig übersetzt, meinen Sie, dass der Baum nicht mehr existiert? Beziehen Sie sich auf diesen Baum: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9396311208

Ist der Baumstumpf noch vorhanden? Wenn ja, sollte er in natural=tree_stump geändert werden. Wenn der Baumstumpf ebenfalls entfernt wurde, können wir den Baumknoten einfach löschen.
MLOerli (2024-07-02 08:58:46+00:00): Hello the stump is still there indeed 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-02 11:22:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238979078

surface=bestraat?

Which value from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface fits? Is it safe to assume and remotely retag with no verification that it is surface=paving_stones? Or can it be also surface=sett or surface=unhewn_cobblestone?
monotar (2022-10-08 20:45:57+00:00): Hallo,

mappen wir hier fürs Luftbild oder für eine praktikable Nutzung der Daten? Es gab Gründe warum die Daten so abgebildet waren sie waren, jetzt sind die Navi-Ansagen alle für die Tonne weil die Kreuzungsgeometrien weder der Ausschilderung noch der Realität entsprechen.
shogun (2022-10-09 05:23:34+00:00): Hi, 
ich glaube da gehen unsere Meinungen total in eine andere Richtung.  Ich versuche, die Wirklichkeit so gut wie möglich abzubilden. Dabei interessiert mich nicht, ob das Navi damit klarkommt. Auf diesen Kommentar hin habe ich die Darstellung anderer Routenplaner angeschaut, alle zeichnen es so ähnlich wie ich es getan habe. Man kann eine Kreuzung doch nicht rechtwinklig machen, nur weil das Navi es da einfacher hat.