piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ElliottPlack (2022-05-02 11:04:56+00:00): nice work adding sidewalks! this helps walkability routing. One quick tip is to add the surface tags if anything. Usually they're concrete. This helps greatly with wheelchair mapping. Cheers!
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-25 02:45:02+00:00): Sorry for the big bbox; didn’t realize these two changesets were so far apart.
angys (2023-09-05 04:31:14+00:00): Adakah nama jalan ini memang Tajung Buah-Buahan?
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
b-jazz (2022-03-26 16:20:09+00:00): Nice bounding box, dummy.
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:39:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:39:38+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
archpdx (2022-03-25 06:55:56+00:00): Hi,
I noticed the updated website includes a tracking parameter (?Identifier=psearch&hotelid=77689&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=google.com-local&utm_campaign=yext&utm_content=wmbend-seventhmountainresort). This is discouraged in the OSM community due to security and privacy concerns, so could you please remove this? (See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website)

Also, please make sure that the place you're mapping isn't already mapped -  in this case a hotel with the same name was already mapped here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4540974639
Aniz Bajracharya (2022-03-28 02:11:03+00:00): Correction are done. Thank you for the feedback.
MxxCon (2022-03-26 01:25:14+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 please don't abbreviate names. Computers can figure out how to make text shorter if for whatever reason it doesn't fit, but it's much harder to go the other way. For example does "St" means "Street" or "Saint".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118890809
Jan Sürth (2022-03-26 10:53:09+00:00): Hey there, I simply attempted to follow the pattern that is used in Manhattan for example. This can be seen at the 7 Precinct.
MxxCon (2022-03-26 17:38:20+00:00): That POI was added almost 8 years ago and probably back then people weren't paying attention to such issues as much.
user_5359 (2022-03-27 07:14:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043625861. What is the meaning od the key fixing_osm_roads = l7tktmask? Did you know the key fixme?
Krishnapriyas (2022-03-25 04:56:19+00:00): Plassanal ward of thalappalam panchayath
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:11:12+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:11:02+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:10:53+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 05:08:11+00:00): 118720003 118719929 118702322 118702297 118702270 118696170 118691899 118688708 118687155 118686426 118686357 118686333 118686319 118685805 118685660 118685606 118685084 118685045 118685022 118684994 118684926 118684921 118684831 118655044 118520078 118519724 118519077 118518956 118518870 118518466
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:10:44+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:10:32+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:10:18+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:09:50+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 18:08:32+00:00): Good changeset, just a couple things:

First of all, please try to break up your changesets into more localized areas. For example, this could have been two changesets, one for each place you added service roads. This helps people who are reviewing changesets.

Also, some satellite imagery still shows the northern place you worked on as being an empty lot. If you ever notice this, you can put a tag on the ways like `source=Bing Aerial` (if you used Bing Aerial as your imagery). This isn't really necessary, just a nice touch if you notice that the feature is very new.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118891858
rekulc1 (2022-03-28 08:34:22+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. However, i will ensure to stick to one location for one changeset so that it helps other mappers.
Also, thank you for sharing insights on the new tags that can be added which helps and adds more clarity on edit.
Going ahead, I'll definitely utilize the new tags available whenever required while making edits.
Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rekulc1
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:09:38+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:09:27+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
user_7130359 (2022-05-05 16:37:12+00:00): 请问为何要删除佛山市的tag？
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
eggie (2022-03-25 06:48:47+00:00): Dag Sven.. Dit gaat voor janenalleman nu routeren.
Lijkt me niet de bedoeling.
Dus access=no en evt emergency=yes indien nodig.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118892821
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk (2022-03-27 18:57:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5848
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:34:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-03-25 10:32:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! why did you delete these tags
building	yes
height	13'
nysgissam:nysaddresspointid	WEST192548
?
user_5359 (2022-03-25 10:37:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-29 07:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119054111 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake objects and names
kcnorthlander42 (2022-08-06 05:59:00+00:00): I was reviewing part of US 69 in Claycomo, MO, and see the road is named Lewis and Clark Trail.  Is this the changeset where that street name was changed?  I think it needs to be named US 69 in the Claycomo section.
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:09:14+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
eggie (2022-03-25 07:03:15+00:00): Sven...   Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2022-03-27 08:36:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
PT-53 (2022-03-26 06:32:01+00:00): Hallo Ronny,
willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast auf der Europastraße in Gammertingen diese
highway=bus_guideway
eingezeichnet:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043646493/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043646496/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043646497/history

highway=bus_guideway sind ganz spezielle Busspuren für Spurbusse.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=bus%20guideway?uselang=de

Ich kann mir nicht so recht vorstellen, daß quer über die Europastraße solche Busspuren führen.

Was wolltest Du denn mit Deinen Eingaben erreichen?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PRonny (2022-03-28 03:57:47+00:00): In Gammertingen Europastraße befinden siche die Bushaltestellen in der Abbiegespur. Der Bus soll nach dem Halt wieder zurück auf die Hauptachse.
PRonny (2022-03-28 04:20:20+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

wäre es eine Alternative, jeweils zwei BusStop's zu erstellen, anstatt der Bus-Spur? Somit wäre es möglich auf der Hauptachse und auf der Abbiegespur zu halten.

Grüßle

Ronny
PT-53 (2022-03-29 06:25:17+00:00): Hallo Ronny, 
da ich mich selbst noch nicht groß mit Bus-Routing befaßt habe, habe ich im OSM-Forum um Hilfe gebeten:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=859127#p859127

Grüße
skyper (2022-03-29 10:11:12+00:00): Hallo
MMn ergibt sich das Problem daraus, dass die Abbiegespuren zu früh als eigene Linien eingetragen sind. Solange noch gestrichelte Fahrbahnmarkierungen vorhanden sind, sollte besser das Spurtagging (:lanes) verwendet werden.
Geben denn die Luftbilder von Bing (2019) noch die aktuelle Situation wieder? Dann könnte ich das mal aktualisieren.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-03-29 11:51:50+00:00): So hab es korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119065620
Insgesamt wimmelt es hier leider nur von Ungereimtheiten und unsauberen Mapping.

@PRonny:
Bitte verwende `highway=bus_stop` nur für die "platform" (oder die stop_position) und nicht für beides.

Grüße skyper
Olyon (2022-03-29 18:05:47+00:00): You removed several ways that weren't rivers but boundaries. I reverted your changeset.
d-e-v-esh (2022-03-29 18:27:01+00:00): Thanks so much for doing that, I realized that mistake yesterday and was figuring out how to reverse it back. Thanks 👍️
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:08:01+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
aixbrick (2022-03-25 09:02:00+00:00): Hallo,
die Adressen sind schon erfasst, nämlich am Gebäude an der Straße. Bitte prüfe das, bevor du sie wieder hinzufügst (das ist hier jetzt schon das 2. Mal). Ich habe die jetzt wieder gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118898907.
Gruß
L'imaginaire (2022-03-25 08:35:28+00:00): In OSM kunnen we niet zomaar wegen op de kaart wissen omdat die privaat zijn. Wat we wel kunnen doen is deze weg markeren als privaat.

Waarom? Er zijn verschillende redenen:
- Door de paden niet te verwijderen kunnen we het duidelijkste aangeven dat je ze niet mag gebruiken. Als de weg er niet meer is, kunnen we ook niet zeggen dat die niet toegankelijk is.
- Als we de weg verwijderen, kan er misschien later een andere mapper komen en de weg opnieuw intekenen op basis van satellietbeelden. Dan zijn we terug naar af.
- Als de weg verwijderd is, dan gaan mensen misschien in de war zijn tijdens het navigeren, bijvoorbeeld "neem de derde afslag rechts". Op die manier komen mensen misschien net méér op private paden terecht.
- Onze kaarten worden ook gebruikt door orde- en hulpdiensten. Een weg die niet toegankelijk is voor wandelaars, kan dat wel zijn voor een ambulance.

Dus, om ervoor te zorgen dat het kaartmateriaal het minst hinder veroorzaakt voor u, hebben we deze wegen als privaat gemarkeerd. Normaal gezien zullen routeplanners wandelaars en fietsers niet meer langs deze weg sturen.

Let wel, OpenStreetMap is eigenlijk slechts een gegevensbron. Het zijn de verschillende producenten, apps en websites, zoals Garmin, RouteYou en Strava die onze gegevens downloaden en gebruiken in hun eindproducten. Daarom is het mee de verantwoordelijkheid van deze producenten en websites om up to date kaartmateriaal aan hun gebruikers door te geven. Concreet wil dat zeggen dat het enkele dagen, weken ... kan duren voor iedereen de nieuwe gegevens gebruikt.
Aleks-Berlin (2022-03-28 07:06:28+00:00): Hi MaxA, please follow this guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
In short: wikipedia=en:Abcd, not http...
Thanks, Alex
itineris (2022-03-29 05:09:51+00:00): Szia!

Szeretném megkérdezni, az Olof Palme sétány egy részéből miért csináltál szervizutat a sétány helyett?

Üdv:
Ákos
kovacsk (2022-03-29 07:04:07+00:00): Szia!

Mert a hivatalos táblázása és a kialakítása alapján az. Mindkét irányból behajtani tilos kivéve kerékpár tábla van a végein és aszfaltozott útfelület, ami fizikailag is eltér a belefutó gyalogos részektől. Kiemelt kerékpáros útvonal, de a park üzemeltető is ezt fogják használni (meg görkorisok, rolleresek, stb.)  Jelöléshez lásd: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Bicycle

üdv
K
itineris (2022-03-29 07:59:28+00:00): Ööö. Ha a Kreszt veszed elő, akkor bizony alapból a park üzemeltetői sem hajthatnak be itt (legfeljebb kerékpárral).
Az Olof Palme sétány másik fele is ugyanígy van kitáblázva, azt mégsem vandalizáltad szét.

Egy kicsit tágabb kitekintéssel: Az átépítés előtt ez valóban szervizútként funkcionált. Járdaszegéllyel, párhuzamos járdákkal. Az új kialakítás (a nyomvonal is változott) terepszintbe emelte az egészet, külön járdák nélkül. Ezért IS gondolom, hogy ez highway=pedestrian.

Üdv:
Ákos
kovacsk (2022-03-29 20:38:15+00:00): Hello! A másik felén nem jártam, azt azért nem szerkesztettem. Majd ha személyesen látom. Mitől vandalizálás, ha az osm szabályzat és a valóság alapján járok el? A pedestrian HAMIS,  akkor kerékpárral csak akkor lehetne behajtani, ha lenne rajta gyalog-kerékpár zóna tábla- de NINCS - és  akkor is csak nagyon lassan. De most nem ez a valóság, ezen az úton akár  40-nel lehet, ezért javítottam át. És ettől még gyalog is lehet. A térkép arra való, hogy aki közlekedik, az ismerje a tényleges helyzetet. 
(Az üzemeltetők most is bejöhetnek sárga villogóval , de még nincs kész, lehet a tábla is változni fog, mert csak erre tudnak járni - akkor aktualizálni kell. Csak arra írtam, hogy ez fizikailag is egy széles aszfalt. Mindenesetre ez nem releváns, mert ilyen címkét nem is raktam rá, vehicle=no. A psv meg rajtamaradt, azt most le is szedem.)
user_10969214 (2022-03-29 21:31:12+00:00): Olá, a rotunda
user_10969214 (2022-03-29 21:32:02+00:00): Olá, a rotunda em questão ainda não está finalizada e está ainda totalmente vedada por isso a meu ver não vejo muito sentido em estar a mapear algo que ainda nem sequer está aberto ao trânsito.
Cumprimentos
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-03-30 05:51:49+00:00): Olá, a que rotunda te referes? O mapeamento em OSM não se restringe a objectos em uso, é possível mapear infraestruturas planeadas, em construção, em ruina, demolidas ou em uso condicionado (privado, permissivo, sem acesso), se a via ainda está em construção podes adicionar essa info. Cumprimentos
topolusitania (2022-03-31 11:17:08+00:00): Rotunda da Praça do Brasil, em frente à estação.  Colocar rotundas em serviço quando ainda estão em obras e com profundas restrições de trânsito na zona, não é seguramente uma pratica correcta.  
Cumprimentos
Daniele Facciolini (2022-03-25 10:48:36+00:00): Good morning. I don't know if this message refers to me. It's my first time with Open Street Map. I added elements only for an exercitation. I know the plauge of cyber vandalism. I think, however, we need to distinguish vandalism from error. I'm trying to remove the elements. I'm terrified of changing maps. In fact I chose a park where to place the training elements and then remove them. Have a nice weekend and a nice day!
kucai (2022-12-11 09:35:37+00:00): Betul ke nama Taman Temerloh Jaya 8? Setahu koi tak pernah jumpa papan tanda nama Taman temerloh jaya 8. Kalau takde, tolong delete. Kalau ada, tolong bgtau kat mane.
mueschel (2022-04-10 17:54:27+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags you add - I found ~ 100 ways with a "fixing_osm_roads" tag that shouldn't be there. I removed them, but please check your new uploads for the same mistake.
wkdgs (2022-03-25 11:49:09+00:00): Hi,

Informationen in Changeset-Kommentaren erreichen nicht sehr viele und gehen daher oft unter. Eine bessere Methode ist es einen Hinweis auf der Karte zu hinterlassen. Dafür gibt es auf openstreetmap.org auf der echten Seite einen Button.

Ich würde die Änderungen gerne korrigieren, bräuchte dazu noch ein paar Infos. Wird die gesamte Kreuzung und die gesamte Brücke gesperrt oder nur Teile davon? Oder hast du eine Quelle, wo ich das selbst nachlesen kann?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118897317
Thundercrow (2022-03-25 16:14:34+00:00): Die gesamte Kreuzung und ebenfalls die Brücke in beide Richtungen sowohl für Fahrzeuge als auch für Fußgänger werden gesperrt. Umleitungen werden eingerichtet.
Schriftlich zum nachlesen kann ich nachreichen, ich habe die Info von einem Freund der beim Bauamt arbeitet.
wkdgs (2022-03-28 08:26:20+00:00): Ich hab das Tagging jetzt korrigiert und die Baustellen eingetragen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119009841

Um eine Straße oder einen Weg als Baustelle einzutragen ersetzt man den Wert des "highway"-Tags durch "construction" und fügt einen "construction"-Tag mit dem alten Wert des "highway"-Tags hinzu. 

Also z.B.:
"highway=residential" wird zu "highway=construction" und "construction=residential".

Außerdem sollte man immer den "check_date=yyyy-mm-dd"-Tag hinzufügen. Dieser gibt an, wann das letzte Mal geprüft wurde, ob die Baustelle noch existiert.

Falls du in der Nähe wohnst, wäre es super, wenn du hin und wieder übrprüfst, ob die Bauarbeiten fertig gestellt wurden, damit die Straßen wiederhergestellt werden können. Falls dir das geplante Fertigstellungsdatum bekannt ist, könnte man das auch noch eintragen.

Gruß
winkeldings
olo81 (2022-05-09 23:58:12+00:00): Nie ma takiej dzielnicy jak Dolna Syberka. Co  to jest Dolna Syberka?
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 07:06:39+00:00): Nie dzielnica :) 
Nazywany fragment dzielnicy tak jak PARK DOLNA SYBERKA przez ciebie dość długo :)
olo81 (2022-06-08 13:14:07+00:00): To są wymyślone nazwy. Nie ma ich w PRNG. Do wywalenia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
phaerrax (2022-12-06 20:03:51+00:00): Ciao. Vedo che hai modificato via Stelvio e via Brodolini sdoppiandole, aggiungendo una traccia per ciascuna corsia. Questo modo di mappare va contro le linee guida (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Corsie). Le corsie della strada vanno rappresentate come vie diverse solo quando c'è una separazione fisica che le divide, e qui la separazione non c'è. Le etichette che erano presenti prima di questo changeset descrivevano già correttamente la geometria della strada, e questo changeset ha peggiorato la situazione.

Oltretutto, le fermate dell'autobus ATM 89 inserite non esistono.
ameziol (2022-03-25 09:01:33+00:00): To nie jest przysiółek, było dobrze wcześniej
L'imaginaire (2022-03-25 10:27:29+00:00): If the whole building is used by the hairdresser, than thay way you have mapped it is fine. If there are other things going on in the building (e.g. apartments on the higher levels, than it is better/easier to map the hairdresser as a single point.
eggie (2022-03-25 09:35:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Alle huisnummers zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Dat klopt in de regl wel.
Beter dus geen nummering aanpassen. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster middels een terugmelding.
Nu is nummer 49 van de kaart verdwenen.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-25 09:44:50+00:00): Nieuwe import aanvraag loopt.. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=858858#p858858

MVG
eggie
Warin61 (2024-01-29 08:23:50+00:00): Hi,

The OSM guide is 'one feature=one OSM entry" So the single 'social facility' is one entry on the property boundary - the individual buildings within the boundary do not get the same tags. 

Next addr:street is for the name of the street not the complete address including the number, post code etc. 

This has been corrected.
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-25 10:28:44+00:00): I think this is a private farm road with public footpath running through. Now it's tagged as a service road it might be used for routing
Misha Boiarkin (2022-04-27 20:46:24+00:00): Good afternoon, PlymouthWalker!
Thank you for your comment, I reversed my edits after your feedback, and special thanks for making the correct tags. From now on we will be more careful with such edits and expand our knowledge of mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118898547
Endres Pelka (2022-06-23 18:15:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
krusefahrer (2022-03-25 20:23:38+00:00): Why haven't you deleted the old house number https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6451328137 ?