piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2023-05-14 19:15:19+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour toutes ces contributionns
quelques remarques
- l'attribut name sert a renseigné le nom propre. les barrières n'ont généralement pas de nom propre, c'est plutôt une description dans ce cas
de quel genre sont ces barrières ? vous avez renseigné une hauteur de 0, cela me semble improbable :) j'ai mis comme type "panneau", corrigez au besoin si c'est autre chose.
Cordialement,
Marc
Kateregga1 (2022-02-24 05:19:46+00:00): Hi, Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011034412 for Puros Conservancy seems to be a duplicate of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009368220

I think one of the two should be deleted
alex-m-ffm (2022-03-07 22:21:37+00:00): Hi, and thanks for hint and sorry for replying only now (had some problems with the latest JOSM update). I guess something went wrong here. In the first go I had thought I removed the tags from the nodes but seems this created a new (duplicate) way. Will delete the old version (which still seems to contain the tags also for the individual nodes of the way).
pantufla (2023-11-20 11:31:28+00:00): Wilmer, parece que este no es el lago leopolgo, según wikipedia.
Famlam (2021-12-10 17:19:49+00:00): Minus de Mapillary bron... dat was de vorige changeset, hier niet gebruikt...
ottwiz (2021-12-17 20:17:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011040610/
Hello, i just want you to notice that you have to split the wooded land which i linked because there are some hollers and residential area in it. Thanks :) You should never map a forest that way, i suggest you map the forest around the roads so where you can see the road, just follow its outline but not overdrawing it especially if it's a major road , not a road that goes into a holler (and especially not over a residential area). If you have any more questions, feel free to reach me out (btw I prefer JOSM for mapping wooded landcover)
voltairovicz (2021-12-16 17:54:39+00:00): Czy przypadkiem dzis oficjalnie trasa nie nazywa się Via Carpatią? Bo widzialem ze na S19 są znaki, ze to Via Carpatia, baa nawet Lecha Kaczyńskiego na dodatek, tylko akurat na odcinku dodanym dziś
maraf24 (2021-12-16 18:40:49+00:00): Trasa od dawna nazywa się Via Carpatia, ale nie jest to nazwa drogi, ale właśnie trasy.
Dzisiaj nadano nazwę drodze i brzmi ona nieco inaczej:) I nie wiadomo, na jakim odcinku obowiązuje.
voltairovicz (2021-12-16 19:42:06+00:00): pewnie sama GDDKiA do końca nie wie XD i kazdy oddzial wojewodzki wzdluz S19 stwierdzi co innego
maraf24 (2021-12-16 21:03:46+00:00): Jeśli chcesz dodać nazwę dla tych nowych odcinków, to proszę.
Może być też w wersji skróconej, czyli Via Carpatia. Pełna może być w official_name.
GEOIG (2021-12-10 18:25:41+00:00): Added Toyota dealership according to official site http://www.autoalba.toyota.es/instalaciones/toyota-almansa and user's feedback
Mashin (2021-12-11 20:21:47+00:00): Hi the ways you drew (1011047320, 1011047319) are overlapping with already existing roads + they are not even properly connected.
Please fix that and refrain from such edits in the future.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-13 14:08:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5531

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
fabiotofy (2021-12-12 17:45:36+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Nel tag addr:city ricordati che si segna il nome del Comune. Il nome della località va in addr:place. Se inizi a compilare dei tag per segnare l'indirizzo va sempre indicato anche il numero civico in addr:housenumber. Buon proseguo!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114794819
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:46:27+00:00): Living street does not exist in Colombia.
AnonJason (2021-12-10 23:30:12+00:00): Hi AngocA, thanks for bringing this to our attention and updating the classification.
Mashin (2021-12-11 20:23:14+00:00): All the building that you drew are of poor quality. They are not squared and absolutely don't follow the true shape of the real objects.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-13 14:08:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5531

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
sladen (2021-12-10 19:17:55+00:00): Ist die Umkehr "U-Bend/Siphon" jetzt geschlossen?

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958589450
ma-rt-in (2021-12-11 14:42:08+00:00): Moin,

nach meine Informationen ja.

vg
MappingMaiden (2022-05-04 22:35:16+00:00): Hi Regina Cohen, thanks for mapping! I noticed you and other mappers using hashtags #opensidewalks #opensidewalks-lapa #AI4Accessibility have added “barrier=kerb” tags in this area. Some of those barriers intersect vehicle navigable roads in several places such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9376648932, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7960181995,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9354077874. This means they will block any car or truck routing at those locations. 

I think you are trying to map places where there are curbs for sidewalks or crosswalks and I noticed OSM policy for “barrier=kerb” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb) says “Combining with highway=crossing is usually a mistake; include kerb=* on the crossing node, but *not* barrier=kerb as there will usually not be a kerb across the major highway, though there could be a traffic_calming=table”. 

So I am wondering if the “barrier=kerb” nodes that intersect with vehicle navigable highways such as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9349157333) could be updated to one of the values at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb? If so we can change them to kerb=yes and then you can add the appropriate type. 

Some of the nodes that were edited to "barrier=kerb" were previously “highway=crosswalk" which might be better suited as that since there does not appear to be a kerb intersecting the road, an example is (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7960181995). Please see the osm crossing wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions!
jaap de vries (2021-12-14 08:04:44+00:00): Ik heb de verkeerde tag even weggehaald, Nature=peak.
dieterdreist (2024-02-12 13:02:14+00:00): Buongiorno granpasso, ho notato che qui hai rimosso il tag "route=hiking" senza sostituirlo eventualmente con un'altro, non è una route hiking?
Saluti,
M
granpasso811 (2024-02-12 17:38:39+00:00): Buonasera, questa variante dell'IFF è intransitabile per numerosi alberi crollati e non è stata oggetto dei lavori di ripristino del Cai di Chiavari per i 700 anni dalla morte di Dante come invece il tracciato principale. Si potrebbe anche cancellare, di sicuro non lo farei risultare come un percorso hiking esistente quando in realtà è dismesso. Saluti
granpasso811 (2024-02-12 17:51:58+00:00): Aggiungo che coincideva in parte con il sentiero "quadrato rosso" che una volta partiva da Neirone. Lo stato di abbandono ha portato la fie a spostare la partenza a Corsiglia.
https://www.fieliguria.com/images/Sentieri-Zone-GENOVA/Zona5/Sentieri-GE-Zona-05.pdf
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-02-13 11:49:11+00:00): Grazie per la risposta, in realtà penso togliere route=hiking non sia il migliore approcchio al tema, perché descrive che la route è del tipo escursionismo (e non trasporto pubblico o altro). Se non è utilizzabile si potrebbe descrivere il problema con un tag "description" o "note", e si potrebbe aggiungere un tag come disused=yes oppure abandoned=yes (o anche status=abandoned), ma in realtà la cosa migliore sono i "lifecycle prefix" perché così si evitano confusioni (come utente non si deve cercare attivamente dei "trolltag" come "status" o "abandoned" perché le relazioni si "nascondono automaticamente" per via della chiave differente).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Saluti,
Martin
BCNorwich (2021-12-11 09:54:18+00:00): Hi, Unfortunately, some sections of the Eday Walk that you've added are duplicating existing highways. Not only is duplication incorrect but it really messes with routing software.

The best way to add a route like this is with a route relation. Where necessary sectioning up sections of existing highways and add them to the route relation. All data pertaining to the route is held in the route relation. The route name should be in the relation not added to individual sections of the route.

The duplicate highways should be removed and the existing highway amended if necessary. Would you like me to add the route relation?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-12-12 09:40:34+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicate highways and added a route relation for the walk. Please see here:- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=13541447

Regards Bernard.
aweech (2021-12-11 01:19:00+00:00): Hi,
Do you have more information about that path that you drew between the edge of the park and Delicate Arch? It doesn't appear to be used at all nowadays based on Strava data. Who calls it "Winter Camp Ridge to Delicate Arch Trail", and is it actually used?
pmckay419 (2021-12-11 02:07:45+00:00): I haven't personally walked all of it to verify it, but I've found descriptions of people hiking to Delicate Arch from the end of Winter Camp Ridge Road and could see a faint trail on aerial imagery. I personally saw the southern end of the trail where it intersects the Delicate Arch trail this May and saw it extending off roughly where I marked it, so I'm pretty sure it's mostly correct. The name is just a descriptive name I gave it. If you think it better to leave it unnamed and put a fixme for the exact path I'm fine with that.
TomPar (2021-12-11 03:19:32+00:00): Please listen to this presentation from a Canyonlands ranger and reconsider if everything needs to become a "trail" in OSM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXXGkBVJK-o&t=19s

I can not see much evidence on imagery.  I personally do not add trails that I can't see on imagery and/or haven't hiked myself firsthand and/or haven't seen on an official map from the land manager.
pmckay419 (2021-12-11 05:17:10+00:00): Ok, I deleted it for now. I may add it back sometime in the future if I have a chance to go there and verify a trail is present on the ground. That's an area I've been wanting to explore for a while.
TomPar (2021-12-11 05:24:00+00:00): Sounds good.

FYI: there is a recently started initiative to evolve trail mapping in OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

Unfortunately now, everything from an informal bushwhack to the Pacific Crest Trail gets rendered on most maps in the same way.  Hopefully, the results of this group will be more nuanced tagging.  ...and hopefully the major mapping products will change their renderings accordingly to make their maps more useful and communicative.

Happy mapping...
pmckay419 (2021-12-11 05:33:53+00:00): Thanks for the resources. Definitely sounds like apps that consume OSM data need to do a better job of differentiating social trails from official trails, and editors need to do a better job of tagging them.
frizatch (2021-12-11 17:11:27+00:00): Exactly! We're working on a way to make this easier.
BCNorwich (2021-12-11 09:12:54+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your edits here don't look correct. You've mapped 3 fords, is this correct? 

The linear ford, Way: 1011042572, doubles back on itself and has an extra duplicated node which is incorrect mapping.

I interpret "Deze weg is niet onderbroken" as meaning "This road is not interrupted". So is the road interrupted or not? Is it interrupted by 1, 2 or 3 fords?

If you have recently visited here could you please explain what the true situation is? I could then probably correct the mapping.

Regards Bernard.
Pulsar2 (2021-12-11 12:40:44+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for your welcome e-mail.
As a newcomer, however, I must confess that I have been too enthusiastic in trying to change it.
What I have tried is, of course, not according to the rules and not correct. My apologies!
I was just feeling pressure because this is a road that is planned on my cycling trip across Scotland and I am finding that it may not be possible to ride it at all. Although if I check via various satellite apps then there is clearly no problem. Can anyone tell me how or where I can check this?
Kind regards,
BCNorwich (2021-12-11 14:44:38+00:00): Hi, Thanks for responding.

First off I've rolled back your three changesets to the state as before you tried to correct things. Now we can see that mapper eteb3 made the change in August 2021 to split Moll Road and place barriers at the split ends of the road. From several imagery layers, (if you zoom in), you can see that the stream has washed away a section of road, and earth barriers have been made to safeguard the road users from going over the edge. I have no idea if this situation still exists or if the road has been repaired.

A search of the internet https://tinyurl.com/yu6y5mbf seems to suggest the road is obstructed until further notice. I think the best way to find out the status of the road is to contact the The Highland Council, https://tinyurl.com/3a9ztcnd

Unfortunately I think you'll have to make a detour. If I can help further please just ask/comment here.

Regards Bernard.
Pulsar2 (2021-12-11 17:22:09+00:00): I was very happy when I read your mail, unfortunately, less so with the state of the road.
I cross my fingers that some work will be done to allow cyclists to use it next year. 
Thanks again...!
BCNorwich (2021-12-13 10:16:54+00:00): Hi, The other day mapper GinaroZ drew a footpath across the landslip stating "description=landslip - cautiously and carefully passable on foot only." So it looks like you may be able to pass walking with your cycle. I'd suggest you contact GinaroZ at "https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GinaroZ2 to see if he can confirm you can pass pushing a cycle.

Regards Bernard.
alester (2021-12-13 18:51:46+00:00): Hi Jeremy,
Clare Street is signed as a "shared road" (this article shows the sign: http://tomhawthorn.blogspot.com/2010/05/how-to-be-good-neighbour.html). This matches the OSM definition of "living street". Here's the OSM Wiki article on that tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street. We don't have many of these around Greater Victoria, but I have seen this one and one out in Colwood.

I'm not sure about Brighton, though. I'm skeptical that just that one section of it was signed as "shared road", so an on-the-ground survey might be needed to confirm how much of it (if any) should be tagged as living street.
jeremy77 (2021-12-13 19:01:22+00:00): I will check next time I am in the area. But I don't think a sign alone is enough to meet the definition of a living street. On street view it looks like a regular residential street, no special infrastructure like diverts, speed bumps etc. OSM says "A general feature of this type of road is, that the legislation either grants pedestrians the right of way over or at equal rights to other road users."
jeremy77 (2021-12-13 19:07:27+00:00): I would rather see the tag reserved for places closed or mostly closed to cars like how government is now as opposed to being used for quiet residential streets.
ma-rt-in (2023-03-08 06:49:28+00:00): Moin,

Wie real ist diese Planung? Zumal mich die Quelle für die Zeichnung interessiert. 

Vg
MapMapper_ (2021-12-10 19:08:00+00:00): Source: Mapillary
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:45:10+00:00): Living street does not exist in Colombia.
Pegasus21 (2021-12-13 14:46:34+00:00): Hi Andres,

Thank you very much for reaching out and letting me and my team know. We were observing signage indicating only local traffic to justify the classification, but we will classify those roads back to residential. Thank you.

best regards, Lauren
ma-rt-in (2022-02-24 17:38:15+00:00): Moin,

kleine Randbemerkung: Du brauchst bei klassifizierten Straßen, welche keinen Eigennamen haben, nicht noname=yes zu setzen. Das ist überflüssig.

vg
blackboxlogic (2021-12-14 03:07:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edits. I'm reviewing a few of them and they look great. I hope you'll ask if you have questions (I might have answers). Some very minor feedback:
- You seem to be making one change per changeset. It's more normal to group together many changes that are in one area and related into a single change set. It's also easier to review that way.
- Adding "source=local knowledge" to elements is just clutter. Changeset comments are a better place to mention a source.
- Adding "oneway=no" to roads is just clutter.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114796293
maro21 (2021-12-18 22:19:39+00:00): lepiej dać access=private, bo jak sam napisałeś, dostęp mają tylko mieszkańcy [private], a nie nikt [no] :). Access=no to zakaz ruchu, czyli np. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:No_trespassing_sign_at_the_railway.jpg 
Opcjonalnie można dać też private na ścieżki i place zabaw na podwórku, jeśli nie są publicznie dostępne.
tslipa (2021-12-18 22:27:31+00:00): access=no dałem tylko w przypadku bramki, która jest zamknięta na stałe (to jest taka furtka jakby ktoś chciał wjeżdżać na podwórko, ale mieszkańcy nie mają do niej klucza i nie mogą z niej korzystać) - stąd taka zmiana, natomiast inne bramki mają jak najbardziej access=private

Z tymi furtkami ogólnie jest zamieszanie, bo co kilka dni coś się dzieje i zamki są demontowane, spółdzielnia coś zmienia i znowu montuje zamki na kilka dni :). Ostatecznie ma to być dostęp tylko dla posiadających klucz, więc jest access=private przy takich bramkach
charl3s (2021-12-10 20:18:24+00:00): na obwodnicy Lublina i nowych odcinakc na południe od Lublina to samo...
4004 (2021-12-11 22:46:09+00:00): здравствуйте, Алексей. вы возможно нечаянно, но удалили кусок улицы Горького.
пожалуйста, пройдите сначала обучение в редакторе
eggie (2021-12-10 20:37:03+00:00): Gestart bij HOT OSM Nu edits in Nederland daarom..
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip:  Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot en nauwelijk te controleren. Beperk je edits tot bv een straat en beperk het aantal toevoegingen in één changeset. Ook svp niet schuiven met de kaart met editor iD. Dat geeft vaak schade.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-10 20:40:47+00:00): Tip .. Geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. Gebruik de adresnode om op bij te taggen.

Een straat met de name = Shortcut lijkt me niet correct.

Kijk even hier hoe met  de name-tag om te gaan.. Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114797773
eggie (2021-12-10 20:46:30+00:00): Straatnaam Shortcut heb ik  verwijderd. Omgetagd naar highway=path Wanneer hier geen oversteek is dan beter verwijderen of wellicht als highway=path .. informal=yes  taggen?
(olifantenpaadje)
Eggie
eggie (2021-12-10 20:49:56+00:00): Info accountant verplaatst naar adresnode. office=accountant toegevoegd. Alleen een naam doet niets.
Mapse
eggie
archpdx (2021-12-13 16:29:25+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Note that the default measurement in OSM is meters, it looks like the width for this cycleway is closer to 10 feet (~3m) as opposed to 10 meters (~32ft)
Peter Agenga (2022-01-13 08:00:34+00:00): Hello thanks for the heads up, are there any available layers that you would advice me to use?
one_half_3544 (2022-01-13 10:55:26+00:00): Well, we have only one layer in OSM, so I don't really know why this happened. I assume your workflow in josm is usual - download specific region->edit->upload. This (first step) would have given you the last/current data.
eggie (2021-12-10 21:05:37+00:00): Beste Zant1.. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. 
Bedrijven worden bijgetagd op de adresnodes en niet op de gebouwen
name=
office=accountant
amenity=bank .. of wellicht hier een office tag.
Geen adressen bijtaggen op de gebouwomtrek svp.
Zou je je tagging willen aanpassen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114798394
MVG
eggie
nmombo12 (2021-12-17 15:32:17+00:00): Hello jpotas,
Thank you for your contributions to OSM. My assumption for this changeset is that you are making this edit for use with the TGC-Designer-Tools utility for the PGA Tour 2K video games. If so, it is not accepted to intentionally map features that do not exist in the real world for this purpose. It is just like "mapping for the renderer", in this case the renderer is TGC-Designer-Tools utility. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Please refrain from deliberately moving nodes like this in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114798481
nmombo12 (2021-12-19 21:27:23+00:00): For further clarification, previous discussions on the OSM US slack have had consensus that even a temporary change is considered vandalism. Any temporary change you wish to make for personal download should be done offline and not pushed to the live OSM database. Please let me know if I can assist with offline edits when downloading for TGC-Designer-Tools.
wkdgs (2021-12-13 11:31:50+00:00): Aber dort existiert schon ein Weg, oder? Sieht zumindest auf den Luftbildern so aus. Dürfen Fußgänger dort lang gehen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114798586
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 15:38:57+00:00): The roads that go through MD-140 to the other side should maintain primary all the way through in both directions, and don't warrant a link or motorway classifications.  Mitchell drive should not have a link road at its intersection with MD-140.  Only the two connections to I-795 should be link.
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 06:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114989400 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109
eggie (2021-12-10 21:39:21+00:00): Beste Zant..
Nogmaals. Het is niet correct wat je hier doet.
Je negeert helaas elke aanwijzing.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114799515

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-10 22:35:06+00:00): removed duplicated tagging wageningen/ dodewaard
eggie (2021-12-10 22:36:58+00:00): removed duplicated tagging Heythuysen
eggie (2021-12-10 22:38:55+00:00): removed duplicated tagging IJsselstein
eggie (2021-12-10 22:41:29+00:00): merged info Raamsdonkveer
ElliottPlack (2021-12-16 06:52:55+00:00): Thanks!
- Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
ElliottPlack (2021-12-16 06:53:12+00:00): Ticket#2021121310000109
czubi (2021-12-14 10:45:41+00:00): Wenn schon überall diese Gartengrünflächen dann diese bitte nicht mit den Häusern und den Zäunen verkleben. DAs macht die Wartung hinterher nur unnötig kompliziert. Danke
czubi (2021-12-14 10:48:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011086500#map=19/50.99333/10.98418&layers=N
leisure=grass gibt es nicht, korregiert
impeira (2021-12-14 18:16:53+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mich bessern. ;-)
tudacs (2022-01-04 20:35:06+00:00): Guten Abend, roter-stern!

Du hast im Dezember diesem Funkturm das Tag 'disused=yes' hinzugefügt, von welchem in der Openstreetmap aufgrund seiner Uneindeutigkeit abgeraten wird.

Könntest du präzisiseren, was genau hier 'disused' ist?

Danke für deine Mitarbeit an der OSM und ein frohes neues Jahr!
roter-stern (2022-01-15 10:36:07+00:00): Hallo,

das ist ein kleiner, alter Sendemast, an dem ein Schild angebracht ist, das in etwa lautet: "Hessischer Rundfunk Fernsehsendeanlage". Muß wahrscheinlich ein Füllsender aus analogen Zeiten gewesen sein. Ich habe keine Informationen gefunden, die darauf schließen lassen würden, daß der Sender noch irgendeine Funktion hat.

Viele Grüße
Björn
archpdx (2021-12-13 16:32:27+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Note that we don't use names to describe features in OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

This name should be removed as it's already correctly labeled as a shed.
eggie (2021-12-10 22:26:10+00:00): Please use the addressnodes for officetags.. not the buildingshape.
Please decrease your edit area.

greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-12-10 22:30:08+00:00): Removed duplicated tagging at buildings