piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stretch Longfellow (2023-01-02 21:36:15+00:00): Why did you revery these trunk roads to primary? under the new classification standards, trunks are supposed to form a complete network, avoiding spurs when possible.
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 22:56:10+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Poprosiliście o weryfikacje.

Jak klikniecie "Q" albo wybierzecie opcję z menu kontekstowego to wyprostuje wam kąty i będziecie mogli rysować idealne prostokąty itp.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215640211
Proszę użyj gotowego wzorca - https://i.imgur.com/JSVPqt9.png Wystarczy wyszukać.

Co do szkoły i przedszkola to poprawiłem po tobie bo trochę dużo by pisać w szczegółach:
- kiedy przenosisz obszar szkoły poza budynek to musisz przenieść także informacje o placówce
- niepotrzebnie dodałeś adres na obszar szkoły gdy taki był już na budynku (duplikacja)
- obszar szkoły przypadkiem oznaczyłeś jako jeden wielki budynek
- w nazwie szkoły przypadkiem dałeś podwójną spację
- poprawiłem obrysy na podstawie ewidencji działek

Pozdrawiam!
Langlaeufer (2023-02-22 20:44:36+00:00): Was soll an der Änderung schlecht gewesen sein?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130307697
unni-geo (2023-03-02 13:20:53+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, 
ist die Frage an mich gestellt oder an die Entwickler von OSMCHA?
Falls an mich, könntest Du nochmal versuchen etwas detailierter zu schreiben was Du wissen möchtest?
Grüsse
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 14:13:48+00:00): Irgendjemand hat diese Änderung von dir als schlecht bewertet. Ich kann daran nichts schlechtes Sehen. DIe Frage war also an nicht an dich, sondern an den Bewerter.
unni-geo (2023-03-02 15:06:46+00:00): Achso, also an einen Bewerter. Ich kenne mich mit OSMCha - bei dem Teil bei dem man sich anmelden muss* - nicht aus. Wie kann man denn der Bewerter ausfindig machen, damit er die Frage zugestellt bekommt? Oder ist das ein Bug von OSMCha, dass die Nachricht an den falschen Absender herausgeht? 

Nebenbei, ich kann auch nichts schlechtes daran sehen. 

* den unangemeldeten Teil benutze ich hingegen gerne, z.B. den grafischen CS-Viewer (http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#130307697)
Luzandro (2023-03-02 18:32:13+00:00): der User wird das kaum mitbekommen, den müsstest du schon anders anschreiben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RedMacryon
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130307697
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 18:50:40+00:00): Hätte sich eigentlich auch gehört, dass er den Grund für die schlechte Bewertung hier im CS erläutert.
b-jazz (2023-07-22 05:40:24+00:00): The name of this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123750989) isn't really "Road Closed", right? I was going to delete the tag or change it to  something more appropriate, but I wanted to check with you first.
fabiotofy (2022-12-21 07:00:02+00:00): Ciao, nel tag addr:housenumber va indicato solo il numero civico. Nel campo name invece va messo il nome dell'edificio, se presente (es. "Villa Rosa"). Buon proseguo di mappatura.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130307874
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 23:00:01+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje. Zmiany wyglądają w porządku. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 22:34:29+00:00): Chodziło o ten CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129897367
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-21 07:57:20+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie!

Jak wiesz jak teraz teren w okolicy wygląda to można by zaktualizować obszar zajęty przez krzaki.

A, nie ma też potrzeby dodawania "Plac zabaw" jako nazwę. To wypełniamy tylko jak on ma swoją nazwę własną, nie trzeba tam opisów obiektów dawać.

Miłego mapowania! Zapraszam na community.openstreetmap.org/ jak masz jakieś pytania
literan (2023-10-06 11:00:46+00:00): привет!

не знаешь, чего это он? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3923132#map=19/55.78487/37.56119&layers=N
Руслан Т (2023-10-06 11:22:45+00:00): Привет, по схеме планировочной организации земельного участка там детские площадки были, да и по снимку видно, поэтому не могу ответить на вопрос. Возможно что-то перестроили во дворе, но пока актуальных данных не вижу.
Frans S (2022-12-25 11:27:50+00:00): Hello. 
A remark. You mapped a row of hedges as a place=isolated dwelling or village.  Please map these hedges correctly in future mappings. I will correct them
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130308429
ted3sco (2022-12-25 18:27:19+00:00): For gardening areas see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments.

Gardener is a business. I fix them.
NorthCrab (2022-12-21 18:06:06+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację. Zmiany wyglądają w porządku. Pozdrawiam!
Frans S (2022-12-28 12:16:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project and welcome to mapping.
A few remarks. 
Your mappings are rather precise, however, where you map a road through a hedge, the hedge needs to be interrupted on that place. So you need to add 2 nodes, (both sides of the road on the hedge), select that short piece, and delete it.
You also ignored the warnings on the issue triangle on the right side of the screen, where you were warned about 11 non-connected junctions. You are supposed to solve those issues.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2022-12-28 13:21:37+00:00): Hi. Back again
Please do not connect nodes of highways to other features, like residential areas, buildings and so on.
you don't need to add a crossing tag on a road crossing.
Please tag the highways in according to this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
 Most common here are unclassified highways and paths, for connecting settlements,  track for access to farmland. woods or water.
Best regards
Frans S (2022-12-28 14:27:55+00:00): Hi, again, back again,
A few points. 
You regular tagged a narrow trace as a track, or unclasified highway.
you can measure the width of a road.
see the list of shortcuts in ID
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts
ctrl+shif+M. draw a line between the shoulders of a trace, use the shortcut , click on the line you draw and read the value. <2 mtr= path
Best regards
Frans S (2023-01-03 14:33:36+00:00): Hello Boyan, Thanks for mapping here.
I saw your comment on the task that there were too many buildings to map at once. You are right. But, the easiest thing you could do was to split the task in smaller parts. So, it are now smaller tasks. Best regards and keep mapping.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-18 18:32:30+00:00): This item isn't a bench...  I have corrected it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4659235560
felipeeugenio (2022-12-21 10:44:14+00:00): Hola Christopher.
Si ya le pusiste todos los datos a la escuela, no se los pongas al edificio. Déjalo solo como edificio y os datos propios del edificio, como el sótano o la cantidad de pisos. La dirección en el edificio sobra en este caso.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130309754
felipeeugenio (2022-12-21 10:44:15+00:00): Hola Christopher.
Si ya le pusiste todos los datos a la escuela, no se los pongas al edificio. Déjalo solo como edificio y os datos propios del edificio, como el sótano o la cantidad de pisos. La dirección en el edificio sobra en este caso.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130309754
HellMap (2022-12-21 22:48:23+00:00): Hello,

Just to let you know, the lake you added was already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123171980 before, so I deleted the duplicate. Not sure if this is a bug with the editor you used and you didn't see the already-drawn lake.
Allison P (2022-12-21 03:48:08+00:00): New aerial, huh?
h551w (2022-12-21 05:11:27+00:00): I suppose so, I've been away for long enough that both Maxar's and Esri's imagery is new to me
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 05:59:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1717080/history has 3=US:AR key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
25or6to4 (2024-03-27 13:52:46+00:00): Sorry, just a typing error on my part.  I have fixed it to the correct tagging.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-21 03:19:26+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=35.769290%2C-90.587493%2C15.83
Aleks-Berlin (2022-12-28 10:16:19+00:00): Hi MRFahruddin,
please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples

wikipedia = "id:Abcd" not "http.."
Could you fix your recent edits? (about 10)

Thanks, Alex
ikopanjirukmana (2022-12-29 02:00:27+00:00): hello Alex
Thank you for bringing this, I've already fixed it.
adiatmad (2022-12-21 12:06:41+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=library (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1123788325). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
tastrax (2023-02-03 04:19:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dimacn (2022-12-21 18:26:12+00:00): Если детский сад имеет территорию, то все свойства этого учебного заведения (в т.ч. название) должны быть на полигоне территории, а не на здании. Адрес - свойство зданий на территории уч. заведения.
Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (2022-12-21 16:27:53+00:00): Som alle bør kunne forstå er hvad jeg skrevet i ændringssæt teksten blevet afkortet. I kraft af det er, https://www.ti    ikke en gyldig URL/URI i dagligt tale et link. Der imod skrev jeg faktisk, https://www.tinglysning.dk som kan forkortes helt indtil https://tinglysning.dk/ - jeg håber ikke det skabte forvirring for nogen, i så fald beklager jeg, at det gjorde.
cats_pajamas (2023-01-06 17:05:43+00:00): Hello phoque, 
I noticed that you made some adjustments to ref tags in the city of Pakse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/133069982). Namely removing the ref=16 tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388093471 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204617179, replacing the value with ’Th 38’ which does not match the ref scheme in Laos to my knowledge and creates a gap in the ref network. The second edit I am curious about was your adjusting the route of int_ref=AH11 away from  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204617179 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386838913.

I wanted to ask what your thought process was and see if you could provide a source for me to better understand these edits? I’d like to ensure that the tagging of these features is as accurate as possible.

Thank you and happy mapping!
phoque (2023-01-07 01:38:02+00:00): Hey!

As for ref=Th 38, I've simply used the ref of the continuation of the road to the west. The road there is using ref=Th 38.

As to moving int_ref=AH11 to the north: the routing of AH11 is along the northern way, and not the southern one. There are highway signs on the northern way, not the southern one.
phoque (2023-01-07 05:34:50+00:00): Ah, it should have been name=Th 38, not ref=Th 38. I've fixed my mistake.
cats_pajamas (2023-01-10 23:14:45+00:00): Thank you for the information and for changing the ref=Th 38 tag to a name tag, it is much appreciated.

The only other possible issue I see here is that the ref=16 route has a gap between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3904621192 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3901953768. Do you know if the ref=16 tag should be connected between those nodes (tag would be ref=13S;16), or if the current tagging is suitable?
phoque (2023-01-11 00:17:52+00:00): That I don't know unfortunately. I would think that just adding the ref should be the best solution, no?
cats_pajamas (2023-01-12 23:22:30+00:00): I have gone ahead and connected ref=16 between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3904621192 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3901953768.   

Thank you for your input; happy mapping!
zstadler (2022-12-30 15:46:58+00:00): Hello mitcho2013,

Thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Please note that the building relation created in this edit was not a valid OSM multipolygon because the two members share a common segment.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Overlapping,_unclosed_member_ways_belonging_to_the_same_role for additional details.

I've removed the relation and tagged each member as a "building=yes"
johantiden (2023-01-14 12:15:27+00:00): Är det Glasmästargatan eller Glasmästaregatan?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566115392#map=18/56.79018/14.44480

Byt namn på endera väg så att bpda får samma namn!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mueschel (2022-12-22 12:29:41+00:00): Please let me remind you about the comments I made on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129546085

This import again violates our Import Guidelines and the Tagging rules. You must not ignore 1490 warnings and errors shown to you before uploading.
TalalQ8 (2022-12-28 12:47:26+00:00): I would like to thank you for your kind reminder and apologize for the mistakes i made. i tryed to download the vertex to edit the tags but it seems that the server is unable to do so. what i can do in this case?
DD1GJ (2022-12-21 09:07:46+00:00): Hast Du das selbst gesehen oder die Entscheidung nur anhand des BayernAtlas getroffen? Dieser ist momentan noch keine offizielle Quelle für OSM und stellt vor allem in Neubaugebieten nicht die aktuelle Realität dar.
wwwebrat (2022-12-21 09:25:48+00:00): Das habe ich selbst gesehen. Und ich kann bestätigen, dass die Daten vom Bayernatlas hier sicher stimmen.
Richard Try (2023-03-01 12:15:06+00:00): Вандализм?
Dimacn (2022-12-21 18:32:04+00:00): Если детский сад имеет территорию, то все свойства этого учебного заведения (в т.ч. название) должны быть на полигоне территории, а не на здании. Адрес - свойство зданий на территории.
Legitimater (2022-12-21 08:02:03+00:00): Bug: instead of showing as a feature type "Gymnasium", it's "Point"

I don't know if it's a bug in OsmAnd, or not. Nevertheless, I still fixed it.
InsertUser (2022-12-22 02:43:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
How big is this spaceport, your changeset seems to span several continents.
HarryStranger (2022-12-22 03:27:27+00:00): Hi, sorry about that. It seems I did changes in multiple locations before I remembered to save. Should I fix this?
InsertUser (2022-12-22 11:44:28+00:00): I suppose if you had other changes in there you could include those in a followup comment, but there isn't a way to split a changeset to give smaller bounding boxes after the fact.
Marek-M (2022-12-21 11:03:42+00:00): Już wycofałem tą edycję, bo słabo wyglądało.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130320197
NorthCrab (2022-12-21 12:08:34+00:00): Zawsze możesz mieć i relacje i dane na obrysach. Carto nie wspiera danych z relacji a jest to dobry sposób mapowania. Dane na obrysach służyłyby jako "fallback" dla starych aplikacji. Pozdrawiam!
Marek-M (2022-12-21 12:36:45+00:00): Pewnie masz rację ale relację chciałem zrobić po to, żeby szpital nie posiadał duplikatu w bazie danych a robiąc relację + dane na obrysach, to ten szpital w bazie byłby zduplikowany potrójnie :) Lepiej niech zostanie po staremu :)
TheNet1996 (2022-12-21 16:57:51+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nutze für Hofeinfahrten, die mit einem KFZ befahren werden können, kein highway=path.

Info aus der Wiki:
"highway=path ist ein allgemeiner Weg für den nicht motorisierten Verkehr."

Danke & Grüße
Mike
TheNet1996 (2022-12-21 17:02:27+00:00): +

surface=asphalt ist z.B. in der Greiffstraße 4 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123825749) auch falsch.

Vor Ort sind Pflastersteine verlegt.
highflyer74 (2022-12-22 07:48:32+00:00): Moin!

Kurze Frage: was hast du hier als Datenquelle genommen? Die Daten vom LGLN sind für uns als OSM tabu, da wir keine Freigabe für die Nutzung haben. Wenn das also deine einzige Quelle ist, muss dieser Änderungssatz  zurückgedreht werden, ebenso alle anderen, die in gleicher Form entstanden sind.

Das geht nicht gegen dich, aber es ist immens wichtig, dass wir nur zulässige Quellen verwenden, um juristische Auseinandersetzungen zu vermeiden.

Sei so nett, kurz hier zu antworten, damit wir gemeinsam eine Lösung finden können.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Gerhard42 (2022-12-22 07:58:38+00:00): Moin,
ich wohne dort in der Nähe und fahre dort regelmäßig vorbei. Ich habe also mich selbst als Quelle und habe bei der Geobasis vorbeigeschaut ob die das genauso sehen bzw. ob da auch schon was steht.
Gruß,
Gerd
highflyer74 (2022-12-22 08:11:12+00:00): Moin Gerd!

Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Wenn du es selbst vor Ort gesehen hast, ist das natürlich in Ordnung. Versuche möglichst, das bei deinen Änderungen auch zu dokumentieren. Es muss aber nachvollziehbar sein, soll heißen, es muss eine Adresse am Gebäude sichtbar sein.

Leider sind Behörden in Teilen Deutschlands nicht besonders kooperativ, was die Verwendung von amtlichen Daten in OSM anbelangt. In anderen Bundesländern ist das teilweise sehr viel besser.

Eine Übersicht über erteilte oder angefragte Datenfreigaben kannst du hier finden:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions

Vor Ort anschauen ist noch immer am sichersten und genauesten :-)

Schönen Tag dir!
Urbis13 (2024-07-21 07:55:06+00:00): Hi,
I have seen that approximately 1 year ago you changed access restriction for vehicle to Sirmione historic center, from vehicle = private, that I inserted about 2 years ago, to vehicle = destination. Do you remember if there was specific reason for that ? Because the historic centre is a restricted area and only permit holder are allowed to enter (access restriction is enforced by automatic traffic camera, so destination doesn't feel appropriate in my opinion)
thetornado76 (2024-07-22 11:55:35+00:00): Hi, quite a long time ago ;-) I think there was a sign at the entrance to the center saying that cars with destination in the center were also allowed. Maybe it was only temporary and private is the more appropriate value.
Urbis13 (2024-07-22 16:17:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for the reply.
Yes, I think the "private" is more appropriate. Because "destination" means that anyone can go if his destination is inside the zone, while in realty only specific permit holders / categories are allowed to enter (or ask permit to enter)
arvdk (2022-12-21 09:09:13+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Dimacn (2022-12-21 18:35:46+00:00): Вы удалили здание детского сада! Пожалуйста редактируйте аккуратнее иначе ваши действия будут признаны вандальными.
flohoff (2022-12-21 09:05:41+00:00): Moin,
weil ich es gerade gesehen habe. Das mit der amenity=fire_station und namen kommt gerne das ganze gelände. Da gehört ja oft nicht nur das Gerätehaus sondern auch freiflächen, parkplätze etc dazu.

Flo
Dimacn (2022-12-21 18:32:35+00:00): Если детский сад имеет территорию, то все свойства этого учебного заведения (в т.ч. название) должны быть на полигоне территории, а не на здании. Адрес - свойство зданий на территории.
SekeRob (2022-12-21 22:58:36+00:00): Hi,

Per favore, BASTA mappare i percorsi sopra i percorsi esistenti, attraverso case e proprietà.

CAIOSM ha la documentazione su come farlo correttamente

Grazie

Please STOP mapping paths on top of existing ways, across houses and properties.

CAIOSM has documentation on how to do this correctly


Thx
Massimiliano Orsini (2022-12-22 17:45:09+00:00): Egregio Sig. SekeRob, forse lei sta solo facendo delle insinuazioni, non capisco dove vede case e proprietà. Il sentiero già esistente, costeggia il campeggio "La Contea", realizzato con mezzi di movimento terra, oggi non più percorribile perchè, l'acqua piovana con il tempo, ha realizzato una specie di canale di deiezione. I residenti di Villa San Sebastiano hanno ritenuto opportuno usare tale itinerario come variante che si collega con la "Via della Legna". Oggi il CAI sta solo facendo il censimento di tutte le reti sentieristiche sul territorio del Comune di Tagliacozzo per farle rientrare sul REI e visionato dalla SOSEC. Ora mi deve dire cosa la preoccupa, perchè presumo che lei non conosce nemmeno la zona, e forse nemmeno ha fatto caso che, tante strade, sono state inserite con il criterio "questa l'ho fatta con la jeep e quindi si può mettere su OSM". Ebbene, oggi le cose stanno cambiando e tutte a favore di un turismo eco sostenibile, e per me è un enorme piacere contribuire alla rinascita DELLA MIA CITTA', che una volta tanto ha capito in che direzione bisogna andare, invece di pensare solo alla cementificazione. Tutto il lavoro che sto svolgendo, segue tutte le regole che CAIOSM ha messo a disposizione, di certo il codice 537B non l'ho assegnato io, ma bensì, la sosec. Se vuole posso anche mandarle delle immagine del luogo, perchè io non sono abituato a blaterare. Spero di essere stato esaustivo, malgrado tutto, le auguro buon natale.
SekeRob (2022-12-22 19:21:33+00:00): 
Wow, chiacchiere comprese. L'hai fatto
1) Mappa percorsi su percorsi, che è immediatamente evidente quando in serie ci sono nodi grigi in un percorso.
2) percorsi mappati attraverso gli edifici. Se non l'hai fatto, allora forse l'edificio si è trasformato in un miraggio, che poi deve essere rimosso.

Ad ogni modo, abbiamo corretto il tuo lavoro e hai consigliato cosa non fare.

Ciao
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-22 15:58:28+00:00): There are holes in the route.
And it should not have individual nodes, eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5828452253
Torgau2020 (2022-12-22 17:26:54+00:00): Hej Niels!

Jag försöker markera upp Danmarks primærruter så att de kan visas, t.ex. som på Wikipedia [som https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prim%C3%A6rrute_15]. Jag ber om ursäkt för de misstag jag gör, det är långa vägar och många musklick! Jag vet att det inte ska vara hål m.m. så de är inte avsiktliga (däremot är jag ganska ny, så undrar om det går att skapa relationer med uppehåll, t.ex. för primærrute 23 skulle det vara bra.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-22 23:52:58+00:00): Det er bra.
Jeg har fjernet knuderne.
Bare vær omhyggelig med kun at tilføje vejstykkerne og ikke knuderne til relationen.
j4kob (2022-12-21 08:51:58+00:00): Sorry, the target url related to my note should be: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/55321/multiple-house-numbers-on-one-building/55359