piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ACarlotti (2020-07-11 21:40:49+00:00): Could you please review and fix the access restrictions tagged on Princess Road (and possibly some of the surrounding roads). You're changes in this changeset and changeset 56900652 (there may be other relevant changesets I haven't noticed) appear to have incorrectly prohibited access both for cars continuing along Princess Parkway, and for cyclists along the cycle route to the east (in particular along the section shared with buses).
Additionally, could you confirm what source you used to establish the existence of a cycle prohibition?
If you need any help working out a valid set of tags, then I can probably help; however, I have no knowledge of the local area, so can't fix this myself without making guesses that might be wrong. From what I can work out, however, I think the intent of your changeset might be best represented by tagging the through stretch of Princess Parkway with "bicycle=no" (and an implicit "access=yes"), and tagging the bus route with "access=no" and "bus=yes", and "bicycle=yes" where it is also used by bikes. I suggest you check this against the advice in teh wiki though, because it's possible I might have misremembered a bit of this.
Pete Owens (2020-07-12 11:52:15+00:00): The cycle prohibition only seems to apply to the northbound carriageway of the A5103. The only bit cyclists are banned from southbound is the M60 link road (the bus lane is only for busses). tags changed to reflect this. Busway changed to an access road.

I cannot find any tags that would ban through motor traffic.

I can't see any tags that would prohibit through motor traffic on the A 5130.
ACarlotti (2020-07-12 19:38:43+00:00): I think the tagging is now better, but there still seem to be some inconsistencies. Firstly, you used the tag "oneway:bicycle=-1"; I think this is an error, since I can't find that tag listed on the wiki anywhere.
Secondly, I think there may still be issues with tagging for pedestrian (and equestrian?) access along the cycle routes, but I don't have the local knowledge to be sure. The easiest way to test this might be to wait a few days for route planner caches to be updated, and then test out  planning routes in both directions on both sides of the junction (if relevant); however, this is not a guarantee of correctness, since I'm pretty sure at least on of the route planners is misinterpreting some access tags. Alternatively, jsut inspect the routes to see if the tags permit the necessary pedestrian/cycle access.
The issue with the southbound carriageway was that it previously had a tag of "access=no", which you've now removed.
Anyway, thanks for looking into this issue so quickly.
Pete Owens (2020-07-12 21:19:21+00:00): I think the -1 means opposite (which seems to be the only way to get a green arrow on open cycle map). In any case I st the whole thing as 2-way, which applies to most classes of user - and buses can only get in at one end.

I normally leave pedestrian and equestrian  tags for cycleways as the default - the exception being the the ones to the south which specifically allow horses and mopeds.
Pete Owens (2020-07-12 21:24:40+00:00): Not that riding a horse or a moped up that  very narrow cycle path would be sensible.
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:33:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
viloan (2018-03-05 14:14:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marc__marc (2020-01-26 09:29:32+00:00): Hello,

that the whole area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566727482

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3152919929
with a pitch inside it, fine

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5456925317
but what's this ?
a pitch inside the previous site (and thus the site shape need to be extended) ?
a very small site not connected to previous one ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5456925316
and this one ?
and what's the meaning of 4x4 ? that's related to 4x4 car accès ?

Regards,
Marc
mueschel (2018-03-06 11:53:49+00:00): Hi,
could you please check the tags on the 280 schools you have added? There are several mistakes:

emanity=School  -> this is misspelled, should be "amenity = school".

elevation=null
operator=null
These look like a mistake and shouldn't appear as tags

preset=Facilities
type=Education
This looks like some tags from an external database which shouldn't be copied to OSM.

By the way, what is the source of your information? Please be aware that all information needs to be licensed compatible with ODbL, otherwise it has to be removed.

Jan
viloan (2018-03-05 14:23:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Allroads (2018-03-08 12:52:50+00:00): Bij deze node koppel je elektriciteit lijnen aan landuse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5456948717

Vandaar die stroom uitval laatst ;-)

zo ook in andere changesets
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5457170235
Of een losse node in de elektriciteit lijn, waar men dan weer een paal verwacht.


Dit zijn meldingen die via validatie in JOSM naar voren komen en je dan voor upload kan verbeteren, bij gebruik van ID worden veel meer van deze fouten gemaakt.
Net zoals we highway niet aan landuse plakken. Plakken we landuse ook niet aan waterway. Dit is later zeer lastig uit elkaar te halen.

Bij Josm gebruik met een BGT en AHN3 layer in dit gebied geeft het je veel meer inzicht in het landschap. Je ziet zelfs dan in een bos, waar ook een sloot loopt.
user_5359 (2018-03-05 15:14:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Could you please add some additional information like name and address?
Glassman (2018-03-05 16:50:37+00:00): I removed the node - it was placed in the middle of an intersection with no other tags than amenity=school.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56905495
eggie (2018-03-05 15:03:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-05 15:07:09+00:00): Er ligt nu een vlak Industrial Marcinia in een vlak Industrial mathenesse.. Dat is niet de bedoeling.  .. Verder zit er een wandelpad aan vastgeplakt. ik pas even wat aan.
eggie (2018-03-05 15:28:50+00:00): Er lopen meer Industrial door elkaar. Eén zonder naam... die aan alle wegen geplakt zat.
eggie (2018-03-05 15:40:14+00:00): De duplicate ondustrial zonder naam heb ik verwijderd. Industrial Marconia ligt nu buiten Industrial met de naam Mathenesse. Het pad ligt weer los. 'k zal de oorspronkelijke mapper even inseinen of hij nog een keer kijkt.
viloan (2018-03-05 14:43:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-03-06 11:51:05+00:00): Hi,
have you read the comments on this changeset? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56576898
Please don't add your private mapping information to the OSM database!
SK53 (2018-08-30 19:47:10+00:00): Hi, I've just come across the amazing detail of indoor mapping at the RNIB on Judd St. Someone from Guide Dogs for the Blind wants there offices to show separately. I plan to split the building along your indoor ways, but have no way of knowing if I've done this correctly (particularly the rooms on the Hastings St side). I'd appreciate if you can look over the change once I've made it).

Jerry
Alan (2018-03-05 16:28:48+00:00): Hello Dani, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for adding that hotel node. I see that the hotel already exists as a building in OSM, but the building is missing the `amenity=hotel` tag, so that's probably why it didn't show up on MAPS.ME. I will combine your node with the existing building.

Thanks again!
philh-591 (2018-03-19 14:58:58+00:00): To way 
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42140138
which should be landuse=forest the changeset
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56904320
removed landuse=forest which should be restored.  Also, this changeset
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56906342
has added 
    leisure=garden
    name=Jardin pédadogique
    access=yes
to this way.  This seems to be in error and these tags should be removed
from this forest area and applied to  
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566724242
which only has this name and no tags to show what it is.
marc__marc (2022-07-22 00:01:37+00:00): Bonjour, j'ignore oü se trouve précisément votre jardin pédagogique mais la surface sur laquelle vous avez introduit le nom contient entre autre le centre de recyclage.
pourriez-vous svp le dessiner un peu plus précisement ?
Cordialement,
Marc
leveskockaa (2018-03-17 16:55:27+00:00): Üdv,
A 442-es főút hol csatlakozik a 32-eshez, illetve miért nem primary teljes hosszban?
itineris (2018-03-18 18:44:32+00:00): Szia!

Jó kérdések ezek. Azt biztosnak vélem, hogy a belvároson már nem megy keresztül elsőrendű út. A régebben ennek jelölt útvonalon sehol sem láttam zöld, pajzsos útszámozást.

A Magyar Közút adatai szerint a 442-es szelvényezése valahol a kertvárosi Auchan magasságában kezdődik (tehát még a Debreceni úti körforgalomig sem ér el, nemhogy a hidakig). A 4-es út csomópontja már kb. a 0+800-as szelvény.

A Google Maps nem forrás, de ők pl. csak a 4-es úttól indítják a 442-est. A Here szintén. Mint ahogyan a Bing Maps is.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Mike Baggaley (2018-03-09 14:53:29+00:00): Hi Pete, I see you have added access for bicycles along the part of Village Way that |I gather is closed for construction. Do you know whether there is pedestrian access as well? If so, I suggest changing access=no to motor_vehicle=no.

Cheers,
Mike
eggie (2018-03-05 15:57:06+00:00): Top!
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56906679
eggie (2018-03-05 15:52:04+00:00): Ja . dit lijkt me beter.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-03-05 21:54:54+00:00): Hello,
there are better sources than Bing. Please, check these ones at Imagery Preferences (JOSM):

Catastro Spain
PNOA Spain

and ICGC:

wms:http://geoserveis.icc.cat/icc_ct1m/wms/service?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=V22AMB_TX,V22AMB_PL,V22AMB_LN,V22AMB_PN,AMBITS_PLTX,V22_TX,V22BCN_TX,V22_PN,V22BCN_PN,V22_LN,V22BCN_LN,V22_PL,V22BCN_PL&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}

wms:http://shagrat.icc.cat/lizardtech/iserv/ows?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=orto25c&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}

Bye!
Алекс Мок (2018-03-06 15:53:24+00:00): Hi,
Thank you, but I draw in Esri & Digital global
urbalazs (2018-05-27 21:53:00+00:00): Miért lett visszanevezve az Arany János út Arany János utcává? Az utcanévtáblákon Arany János út szerepel.
trigpoint (2018-03-05 15:55:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I am a little confused by this change as this has always been Church of England, yet you have changed the denomination to Catholic. I believe that this edit should be undone.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2018-03-05 18:05:01+00:00): You have also removed the building and place of worship tags.

I have reverted this
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
user_6110846 (2018-03-09 09:16:52+00:00): Добрый день 
а откуда информация ведь это частная воинственна я бригада  которая как наемники воюют за границей в Донбассе Сирии  и других гарячих точках        Информация о них является не публичной
evgenykatyshev (2018-03-09 09:25:03+00:00): Информация отсюда:
https://www.znak.com/2018-03-05/kak_vyglyadit_lager_chvk_vagnera_v_krasnodare
https://www.svoboda.org/a/29084090.html

Но т. к. даже название «Вагнер» неофициальное, то поместил в description.
dvdhoven (2018-03-06 08:55:29+00:00): This modification is not correct.
It should be rhn_ref=31 
It is horse network and that is rhn not rcn
I have changed it back to rhn

Greetings,
Dick van den Hoven
Martin Borsje (2018-03-07 18:56:46+00:00): een opgeheven camping kan gewoon verwijderd worden; wat ik gedaan heb.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Polarbear (2018-03-29 20:08:00+00:00): Hallo sandrow75, zieht Multipolster tatsächlich nur in dem östlichen Bauteil ein? Ich hatte im Vorbeifahren den Eindruck, dass alles was vorher Obi-orange war, jetzt schwarz und Multipolster ist, ausser dem Glashaus?
sandrow75 (2018-03-31 13:09:30+00:00): Hi dafür hättest du einfach nur "obi alt mahlsdorf " bei Google eingeben müssen und schon hättest du die Antwort.
 
http://www.mario-czaja.de/2017/11/update-aktueller-stand-zur-bebauung-des-ehemaligen-obi-marktes/
Polarbear (2018-03-31 13:22:21+00:00): Sehr gut, danke. Werd ich mal nach den Osterferien ein paar frische Fotos schiessen.
Frohe Festtage!
user_5359 (2018-03-05 18:11:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
eggie (2018-03-14 18:34:51+00:00): Hi... 
highway-footway (or maybe path )  does'nt need a tracktype. 
Only a track needs tracktype=grade?
eggie (2018-03-14 18:45:32+00:00): removed tracktype from footway and surface grass from bridges.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-03-05 21:44:23+00:00): Hola!
Gràcies per sol·licitar la revisió. Veig que és la primera edició. 
Només comentar-te que no calen les etiquetes addr al carrer d'Emilia Coranty.
Segurament ja heu tingut contacte amb la comunitat catalana d'OSM. Si us cal ajuda o assessorament (potser us interessa utilitzar un editor més potent), només cal que contacteu i quedem un dia.
Salutacions!
user_5359 (2018-03-05 18:11:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't believe, that the company isn't work in a building.
chuss001 (2018-03-05 18:17:33+00:00): What do you mean?
user_5359 (2018-03-05 19:05:37+00:00): Please move your node inside a building!
philh-591 (2018-03-19 14:59:43+00:00): Changeset
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56908170
has duplicated areas
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566741080
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566741081
One of them should be deleted, probably 566741080 because the later way 
has all the same tags and more.  Also this should be identified as some 
kind of area.  
    area=yes
Cascafico (2018-03-06 12:46:09+00:00): Buongiorno,

quale fonte è stata usata per riportare il nome "Via Canevale"?
corfede (2018-03-07 09:09:02+00:00): Buongiorno, anche io avrei la curiosità di conoscere la fonte usata, visti gli inserimenti della toponomastica eseguiti per molti comuni italiani; ieri ho inviato un messaggio privato su OSM a datamove con la stessa richiesta.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-07-19 17:01:00+00:00): whats the source for this name?
tobiasra (2018-07-25 05:18:27+00:00): Ah, I remember this place! A small sign on place said so when I visited the cliff and saw that penhasco translates to cliff. Thought it was full of beauty and saw it worthy of adding to OSM. I am not native to Madeira. If its not the real name I urge you to change it.
s0mik (2018-05-18 12:07:20+00:00): А чем не понравилось как было?
GinaroZ (2018-03-06 16:29:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these businesses. However you didn't tag them with shop=e-cigarette - I've added that tag so they show as shops on the map :)
cerdo (2018-07-20 05:01:34+00:00): way: 566756625, 566756626
layer=-1;0 not alloow, pleas fix it
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
bjc (2018-07-21 19:19:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsteps

Bitte Deutsch und lesen hilft
532910 (2018-07-07 11:14:34+00:00): Да, я неправильно проставил многие пешеходные переходы как crossing=zebra.
Но зачем ты исправил на неверное highway=crossing? Пешеходный переход это не highway=crossing, а highway=crossing + crossing=uncontrolled.
Навигатор должен предупреждать о пешеходных переходах.
literan (2018-07-11 17:12:50+00:00): ты неправ, читай вики. Пешеъодный переход это именно highway=crossing. А субтег crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals отвечает за тип перехода (регулируемый/нерегулируемый). 

Что касается моей правки, я спрашивал у целого ряда редакторов, проставлявших эти "зебры" - они мне отвечали, что ставили их, т.к. на асфальте нарисована "зебра". Так что никакого однозначного соответствия с crossing=uncontrolled и в помине не было.
532910 (2018-07-11 22:37:19+00:00): в вики есть пример:
Нерегулируемый пешеходный переход. Переход через дорогу только для пешеходов, обозначенный принятой в стране дорожной разметкой на проезжей части и/или соответствующими дорожными знаками, не оснащенный светофорами (но оснащаемый в Великобритании и бывших английских колониях мигающими шарообразными фонарями янтарного цвета).

highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled

Это раз.

Если поставить просто "highway=crossing" то OSMAND  ничего говорить не будет. А если поставить crossing=zebra (как я неправильно делал не разобравшись в вопросе) или  crossing=uncontrolled то будет говорить "attention pedestrian crosswalk" или "внимание пешеходный переход"
Я хочу и считаю что он должен предупреждать обо всех нерегулируемых переходах и буду за это бороться. Если тебе не нравится --- просто отключи в настройках маршрутизации анонсирование переходов.

Это два.

Пожалуйста, отмечай зебры без светофоров highway=crossing + crossing=uncontrolled. Убедил?
literan (2018-07-12 07:47:49+00:00): у меня такое ощущение, что ты мне пытаешься доказать то же самое, что я тебе говорю )) Да, highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled это теги для нерегулируемого пешеходного перехода. Да, если поставить просто "highway=crossing", то Османд ничего говорить не будет (прекрасно знаю, т.к. сам им пользуюсь). Поэтому и уточняю переходы тегами crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals по мере сил.
532910 (2018-07-28 18:47:45+00:00): я лишь хотел сказать, что ты удалил мои crossing=zebra, вместо того, что бы заменить их на crossing=uncontrolled

или я не прав?
literan (2018-07-30 16:59:23+00:00): Что значит "мои crossing=zebra"? точки переходов никто не удалял, был удален с них лишний тег crossing=zebra. Почему - я уже писал выше, напишу еще раз если ты не заметил. "я спрашивал у целого ряда редакторов, проставлявших эти "зебры" - они мне отвечали, что ставили их, т.к. на асфальте нарисована "зебра". Так что никакого однозначного соответствия с crossing=uncontrolled и в помине не было."
532910 (2018-07-31 09:36:46+00:00): если на асфальте нарисована "зебра" --- это "crossing=uncontrolled"
с чего это вдруг нет "никакого однозначного соответствия"?
literan (2018-07-31 12:22:16+00:00): нет. crossing=uncontrolled это нерегулируемый пешеходный переход (т.е. на нем нет пешеходного светофора). А разметка типа "зебра" может быть нанесена на любом переходе (и на регулируемом, и на нерегулируемом). Отправляйтесь читать вики, меня эта сказка про белого бычка начала утомлять.