piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
ToniE (2021-05-17 07:24:20+00:00): Thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104830692, 104812722, 104825757, 104828444, 104822539, 104816372, 104819623 where the changeset comment is: remove nationalist vandalism
map per (2021-05-17 07:43:52+00:00): Nur einen Teil von cs104062567 reverted
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-17 19:01:03+00:00): Do not change to contact:* scheme.
DDROMAGNY (2021-05-21 12:12:50+00:00): Attention aux numéros de téléphone, on les saisie toujours en commençant par +33 5 58...
Je l'ai corrigé pour celui-ci ;)
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104806130
Stagiaire Orthe Arrigans (2021-05-21 12:21:04+00:00): Très bien, je serait vigilante à l'avenir ! merci :)
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-21 09:05:31+00:00): Hi, Sophorn Som. Your edit looks awesome.
I found the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/943795415) crossing with waterbody id 349646379.
while you travel this road, did you notice any bridge that connects this highway? Because it's crossing with waterbody. please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-18 17:09:18+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a un doublon de fleuriste non : 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8111856835
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8738436156
multimodaal (2021-11-16 21:57:43+00:00): Hoi, dank voor je bijdrage. Je hebt ook hier een algemene access=private toegevoegd op paden waar je wel mag wandelen. Dat is niet de bedoeling, zoals Eggie al aangaf in zijn bericht op https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93917503 .
Ik heb dat hier hersteld. Zou je dat zelf verder willen herstellen op andere plekken waar je dat hebt gedaan? Dank en groet!
Sulfo (2021-05-17 08:44:24+00:00): Hej Vadskær. 
Du skal undgå at flytte rundt på addresser, da de automatisk bliver holdt opdateret via en robot: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS

Hvis data er forkert skal du kontakte kommunen, da adressen skal rettes i  Danmarks Adresseregister.
Vadskær (2021-05-17 09:13:40+00:00): Jeg har ikke flyttet rundt på adresser. Jeg har blot angivet at en sti er af græs og ikke asfalt samt at der hverken må være ryttere eller cyklister på stien.
AsgerFrank (2021-05-23 15:54:57+00:00): Der mangler anført en kilde for ændringen, adgangsbegrænsningen for ryttere/cyklister.
Bert Araali (2021-05-17 09:48:58+00:00): Dear, even after validation the buildings remain misaligned.  Some are round huts but drawn still as square buildings. In this case the misalignment was caused by previous changes to correct aligned roads according GPS tracks and re-alignment to satellite imagery.  Everything is off by 5m now. I created another calibration point in Kibuku and re-aligned the roads again to the correct GPS tracks, UNRA GPS, Mapillary and OpenStreetCam. Please start mapping only after aligning your imagery to GPS tracks in OSM or, if not available the existing roads. The imagery you use is not correct, NOT the map.
DEO NISHIMWE (2021-06-01 08:22:18+00:00):  i am very sorry every thing i did not do in right way,i understand you did a lots of work to fix back the road,i might have focused my attention on buildings and forget to fix offset on the road,for building what i can say is some building my look round huts in one  imagery and when you use an other imagery you find that they are square,i need to know which imagery you used to validate my work if there is anything i can do to fix the buildings i will do it.
Bert Araali (2021-06-01 16:48:50+00:00): I used the Maxar Premium Imagery, you can always find that in the source of the changeset. Determining the date of Maxar Imagery might be a challenge since the metadata is not accisble through any OSM editor. However, other resources using also Maxar might give you a clue, so referencing some recent new buildings in Kibuku indicates that the Maxar Premium Imagery in OSM is from 01/2018, so much more recent then the 02/2016 you refer in the source of the buildings added. Regarding offsets, yes they were updated by another user in 2019, incorrectly, he aligned roads with his imagery and even changed many road classifications. The imagery originally was aligned according gpx tracks, as stated in the changeset comment, in an older HOT project. So I tried to find out the correct calibration of the map.  Nearby, the Fort Portal - Ntoroko road (a bit south of your changeset) has a very accurate GPS track stored and freely accessible in OSM.  The land north of this road is fairly flat, south is the Rwenzori's.  Offset remains fairly constant across large distance in flat areas, so it is safe to use it for your area of interest. For your convenience I added an angular road plot in Kibuku town which can be accessed thorugh the Imagery Offset Database, in JOSM. If you use iD I can give you the exact location.  These are calibration points, so no offsets for the imagery you are using, you have to determine the offset and align imagery correct in regard to these calibration points before you start mapping or changing anything. So from now on it is safe to re-align your imagery and change the position of the buildings on the map.  Never change map to fit your imagery as no imagery is correctly calibrated, none. For your convenience for the current imagery available in OSM, the offsets are as follows:
Bing = -7.17; 1.94 (imagery capture date up to 02/2016)
Esri (clarity) beta = -0.15; -4.48 (imagery capture between 03/2016 and 11/2018)
Maxar Premium = 5.74; -1.12 (imagery capture 01/2018).
The buildings I used to check for imagery dating are at 0.939 , 30.238 .  You can verify those with the dating of your imagery to find out what is the most recent but as far as I am concerned it doesn't lake sense to import data based on imagery which is older of what we have. Importing is discouraged anyway since it leads to this kind of inaccuracies.
philippec (2021-05-18 18:22:26+00:00): Mechelen kathedraal,
wat hebt u veranderd ?
philippec (2021-05-20 11:23:14+00:00): Ik heb nog eens nagekeken.
Het geheel is geen deel van het geheel.  Ik vermoed dat dat goed gedaan is.
Behalve de uitleg dan.
Buraddo (2021-05-17 10:22:52+00:00): Hello, thank you for correcting the Taco Bell mistake, but can you add back the deleted tags (mall specific tags, mall name) ? This is also the case at the other buildings you have edited.
kate_rocketdata (2021-05-17 11:01:00+00:00): hello, yes, of course, I'm so sorry
G_P_J (2021-05-17 08:42:27+00:00): Zwróć uwagę na znacznik. Nie addr:city, tylko addr:place (miejscowość nie ma ulic) Poprawiam te błędy w całej Polsce. W zeszłym tygodniu w końcu wyczyściłem wszystkie. Teraz znajduję nowe, właśnie takie, jak ten.
km2bp (2021-05-17 08:51:23+00:00): Sory nie znałem tej zasady że skoro nie ma ulicy to wpisuje się  addr:place tym bardziej że edytor przeglądarkowy kusi ramką do wpisywania nazwy miejscowości w polu adresu i automatycznie konwertuje to na zapis addr:city. 
Będę teraz pamiętał i nie złość się gdy napotkasz wcześniejsze moje błędy.
G_P_J (2021-05-17 09:12:39+00:00): Spokojnie, nie złoszczę się na nikogo :) Wcześniejsze błędy posprzątałem już w całej Polsce. Teraz będę pilnował, aby nie powstawały nowe. :) Jeśli odstaniesz powiadomienie z abakus_uploader, to znaczy, że w adresie jest błąd. Wiem o niedoskonałości edytora iD. Niestety nikt z twórców nie skorygował tego problemu. Życzę miłego mapowania :)
JeroenHoek (2025-11-16 21:06:23+00:00): Hoe kwam je bij de naam Bischopspoort? Is dat een alt_name?

Dit is namelijk de Munstersepoort werd mij verteld door een inwoner van Bourtange. Dat lijkt ook te kloppen verder:

https://www.rickvanhouten.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kaart-van-de-vesting-Bourtange-Hendrik-Hofsnider-1743-bron-rijksmuseum.jpg
martiensch (2025-11-19 18:38:11+00:00): De wijziging is wel erg lang geleden. Ik gok dat ik het destijds van de straatnaam overgenomen heb.
JeroenHoek (2025-11-19 19:35:49+00:00): Ah duidelijk. Dan laat ik die verder weg.
mavl (2021-05-18 13:11:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Кавычки в названиях не нужны. Пишут просто - Берёзка. Буква «ё» желательна. 	Номера телефонов желательно указывать в международном формате:  
+7 3452 720278  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
iWowik (2021-05-18 14:20:02+00:00): Буква «ё» просто обязательна, если она известна, в именах собственных, так как иначе может возникнуть неоднозначность. 
Ибо формально в собственном имени может быть всё, что пожелал придумавший это имя.
MKnight (2021-07-02 09:03:45+00:00): Moin, 
durch den bisher fehlenden https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8887192679 dürften die refs nicht stimmen.
bahnpirat (2021-07-02 11:16:16+00:00): Vor etwa einem Monat habe ich am Anfang und Ende der Leitung (Mast 3 und 67) die Beschriftung ermittelt. dabei waren diese durchgehend konsistent. Da du jetzt einen 'neuen' Mast gefunden hast, musste an einer anderen Stelle ein Mast zu viel sein und der Fehler irgendwo dazwischen liegen. Und tatsächlich war die Nr. 50 zu viel. Das habe ich korrigiert.
!bm (2021-05-18 17:58:14+00:00): Hallo Rheingauradler,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

disused:shop=books war schon richtig. Entsprechend korrigiert.

--besteGrüße!bm
Velikodsky (2021-05-17 11:49:49+00:00): Ні, це не правильно. Контур будинку треба креслити не по даху, а по фундаменту. А так вийшло, що будинок навіть перетинається з дорогою. Будь ласка, виправте. Також врахуйте, що знімок Bing прив'язаний не точно, він потребує зміщення, яке Ви можете виставити в редакторі iD (Adjust imagery offset). Зміщення Bing у цьому районі: 5.88; 1.72
yuriimed (2021-05-17 13:14:32+00:00): подскажите как отменить изменения
Velikodsky (2021-05-17 13:26:37+00:00): Є декілька способів (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Відкат_змін ). Найбільш зручний - у редакторі JOSM є плагін Reverter. Якщо не вдастся, напишіть - я зроблю відкат.
yuriimed (2021-05-17 14:24:40+00:00): Откатил, проверьте пожалуйста.
Velikodsky (2021-05-17 15:23:18+00:00): Все вірно.
yuriimed (2021-05-17 15:27:12+00:00): дякую за допомогу
Velikodsky (2021-05-17 16:10:43+00:00): Нема за що). Підключайтесь до нашого чату https://t.me/osmUA . Можете шукати там відповіді на питання.
user_2066394 (2021-05-17 21:09:18+00:00): Steht da tatsächlich niirgendwo ein Ortsschild in der näheren Umgebung?
Chrisbie (2021-05-18 07:33:18+00:00): Doch, ich hatte es leider gelöscht und wusste nicht, wie ich es wieder herstellen kann. Gibt es da eine Vorlage?
user_2066394 (2021-05-18 08:53:48+00:00): Hab es mal zurückgeholt, damit die Versionsgeschichte erhalten bleibt.
Chrisbie (2021-05-18 11:06:10+00:00): Danke!
Buraddo (2021-05-17 09:39:26+00:00): Hello,
ce vrea să reprezinte poligonul desenat de tine? Zona era deja marcată drept zonă rezidențială, iar numele #rezist2021 sigur nu e numele cartierului.
Romolus0305 (2021-05-17 11:16:38+00:00): Salut, e o delimitare pentru facultate, e temporara, iar #rezist2021 e pus de facultate. Scuze ca am deranjat cu poligonul meu
Buraddo (2021-05-17 12:38:29+00:00): Nicio problemă, baftă în continuare la treabă, am văzut că ați adăugat destul de multe clădiri. Dar încercați să țineți pentru voi împărțirea internă a proiectului. Este o platfrormă publică și astfel de informații nu au ce căuta.
gileri (2021-05-17 10:14:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans les zones de rencontre les vélos sont autorisés par défaut, tout comme les piétons, pas besoin de le spécifier explicitement :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210729546

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29014360
gileri (2021-05-17 10:12:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez accidentellement modifié le contour d'un quartier au lieu d'une rue, j'ai annulé la modif ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104816486

Dans l'éditeur iD, vous pouvez cacher ces limites administratives pour éviter de les modifier accidentellement :
 menu de droite, puis "Données cartographiques", puis décochant ce que vous voulez (ici "Frontières").
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-17 14:11:26+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 104802991, 104803162, 104803253, 104803330, 104803420, 104803472, 104803511, 104803572, 104803626, 104803760, 104803880, 104803981, 104804113, 104804136, 104804217, 104804240, 104804261, 104804282, 104804316, 104804339, 104804369, 104804425, 104804467, 104804527, 104804574, 104804608, 104804644, 104804667, 104804706, 104804768, 104804794, 104804826, 104804876, 104804923, 104804983, 104805040, 104805068, 104805100, 104805139, 104805166, 104805194, 104805230, 104805283, 104805304, 104805362, 104805394, 104805422, 104805454, 104805483, 104805523, 104805556, 104805621, 104805663, 104805705, 104805787, 104805803, 104805821, 104805879, 104805924, 104806000, 104806066, 104806101, 104806144, 104806217, 104806251, 104806277, 104806307, 104806343, 104806377, 104806420, 104806455, 104806494, 104806529, 104806609, 104806650, 104806722, 104806741, 104806798, 104806821, 104806849, 104806874, 104806896, 104806928, 104806945, 104806983, 104806999, 104807044, 104807076, 104807098, 104807132, 104807157, 104807184, 104807216, 104807295, 104807383, 104807422, 104807453, 104807488, 104807518, 104807543, 104807592, 104807639, 104807658, 104807947, 104807996, 104808041, 104808094, 104808121, 104808148, 104808178, 104808286, 104808311, 104808344, 104808455, 104808527, 104808558, 104808613, 104808647, 104808727, 104808825, 104811149, 104811207, 104811256, 104811283, 104811327, 104811361, 104811384, 104811406, 104811476, 104811538, 104811571, 104811601, 104811661, 104811703, 104811759, 104811924, 104811954, 104811990, 104812036, 104812067, 104812104, 104812152, 104812202, 104812258, 104812284, 104812323, 104812350.
pesec (2021-05-17 11:49:46+00:00): Хорошо, но нужно было name удалить.
ovruni (2021-05-17 17:19:26+00:00): Hola, nuevamente le pregunto igual que en los conjuntos de cambios 98546936
 y 98631906. ¿A que se debe el cortado de vías? Sus comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios no indican el motivo, solo dicen "cut the road". Por favor revise la sección de buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios [0], de tal forma que otros usuarios puedan entender el motivo para este cortado de vías.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
MatthieuMartin (2021-10-31 16:34:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Quelle est la source du nom galibier?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225809052

La BD Topo IGN indique :  Route de Roselend
Silym (2021-11-02 09:41:45+00:00): Oups, en effet c'était une erreur, bien vu. Corrigée. Merci ! :)
MatthieuMartin (2021-11-07 23:13:32+00:00): Super!! Merci beaucoup!! 
Magnifique route et région :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104813741
kakiremora (2021-05-17 09:36:34+00:00): użyłem tu też cieniowania rzeźby terenu ISOK
trial (2021-05-20 21:45:32+00:00): Bonjour, bon retour sur OSM. Attention, s'il s'agit de chemins au cadastre par exemple ou visibles sur les vues aériennes il ne faut pas les supprimer. En effet on sort d'un confinement et d'un hiver suivi d'une période chaude propice au développement de la végétation : il est possible que ces chemins soient à nouveau utilisables. Et on peut mettre pliens d'attributs pour préciser la praticabilité. Ne serait-ce que par une description. Tandis que là le boulot précédent a été perdu et pour voir ce qui a été supprimé ce n'est pas trivial.
Jakka (2021-05-17 11:33:17+00:00): De naamgeving is dit een officiële naam ? het pad is over gans de lengte een brug ? Op dit pad staat access=no dit is een volledig verbod voor alles .... Het traject loopt dit niet kort bij de beek nu lijkt eit toch soms veraf ???? Graag wat info tot verbetering...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104814173
Jakka (2021-05-17 11:35:35+00:00): Op luchtbeelden loopt er links van de beek een tractor spoor werd het pad daar aangemaakt. Uitwelke ondergrond is dat pad ? verlicht ? eventueel breedte ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104814173
Jakka (2021-05-17 11:38:23+00:00): Kant Wijdouwbeekstraat is het pad niet verbonden aan een weg maar "landuse"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104814173
Jakka (2021-05-17 16:29:18+00:00): Nodige aanpassing werden gedaan thx
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104814173
limes11 (2021-05-17 18:14:51+00:00): Hallo, 

willkommen zu osm. Das war hier alles korrekt erfasst, access=customers und amenity=parking fuer die Besucher. Damit ist dies kein Parkplatz für die Allgemeinheit.

VG, Limes
Monsch (2021-05-18 06:02:26+00:00): Hallo,

Leider sieht der normale Nutzer, diese Hintergrundinformationen nicht, sondern nur ein P Symbol. Oft werden doch OSM Karten als Hintergrundkarte in Freizeitanwendungen(Siehe Komoot) genutzt, diese suggerieren dem Nutzer dann eine öffentliche Parkmöglichkeit. Das Symbol kann man ja nicht unterscheiden, oder?
Grüße
limes11 (2021-05-18 06:51:38+00:00): Das hängt vom Kartenanbieter ab, manche machen das schon clever - Komoot gehört, was Parkplätze angeht, nicht dazu. Ist natürlich auch kein Tool für Autofahrer. Es gibt zehntausende Kundenparkplätze in osm, wir können das Tagging-Schema nicht an die Renderer anpassen. Lassen wir es so und hoffen, dass es wirkt.
mueschel (2021-05-24 09:07:58+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag 'uik:ref' here. Shouldn't that be 'uic_ref'?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/75362225
Trvr (2021-07-27 09:20:18+00:00): Sure. Thank you for attention!
eggie (2021-05-17 10:06:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback :  Keurig toegevoegd, maar het stukje tot nr 43 wordt gebruikt door de bewoners om met de auto voor hyn wonig te komen.
Wat is de status van deze weg? 
Heeft dat stuk straat ook een naam?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-17 10:10:21+00:00): Het brede stuk zou je als highway=pedestrain kunnen taggen met motorvehicle=destination
Weg even afsplitsen. 

Het is een beetje onduidelijk.
mvg
eggie
J Roovers (2021-05-17 10:56:50+00:00): Ja klopt, tot en met 43 mogen autos de stoep op. Dat stukjes straat is deel van het vluttersven.
Larmax (2021-05-17 10:07:38+00:00): Hi, what are those tiny buildings within the building called "Joensuun Tila Oy" / way 935787255 ? Why is there one of them also called "Joensuun Tila"? If they are rooms within a building they should be tagged as rooms, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
If not, and they are outdoor parts of the surrounding bigger building the smaller ones should be tagged as building:part=yes not as individual buildings.
opendcc (2021-05-17 12:34:45+00:00): Hallo,

wieso access=no? Im Bericht stand nichts von Fahrverbot ...
citro (2021-05-17 12:40:54+00:00): Sorry, mein Fehler. Ist schon bereinigt und den Weg wieder zurückgesetzt. Die Straße ist noch nicht abgerissen. Die Segmente belaufen sich auf Höhe Unterkurf, falls sich doch entschieden wird. Grüße Hans
eggie (2021-05-17 10:12:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. maar shop=car_parts heb je laten staan. Moet dat ook niet weg?  Je blijft anders een symbool zien.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-17 10:31:30+00:00): Dag Flakkeeënaar.. Het lijkt me een logische aanpassing.
MVG
eggie
ravali_78 (2021-05-18 02:48:25+00:00): Hi GrabSG_sitiamirah,
I have modified invalid turn restriction.Kindly check with r12694805,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104854303.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104815589
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-17 09:58:46+00:00): z https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2668798
SomeoneElse (2021-05-17 11:39:01+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for restoring this!
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group.
richlv (2022-03-06 21:06:39+00:00): Hi, this changeset changed this whole path to access=private : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164510899 .
Is the whole path not accessible?
If so, what about the offshoot paths, viewpoints along it?
lukie80 (2024-06-23 10:59:42+00:00): Seems valid. According to "Catastro Spain" layer, all paths lay within the same parcels. Also the German hiking guide "Rother Wanderführer" warns about the land owner and mentions barriers. Welcome to Spanish laws.
richlv (2024-06-23 23:07:10+00:00): Thanks, what about the side/offshoot paths, viewpoints along it? That would make them all =private, too.
lukie80 (2024-06-24 19:20:43+00:00): If the claim of private property is correct, all side paths are most likely affected. I've removed access=private on parts of the paths which are on public land.
lukie80 (2024-07-22 06:52:09+00:00): Have been there 2024.07. All paths are blocked by a fence or a gate. According to a Masca supervising personnel the owner was fed up with vandalism and gated his property. In romanic countries public access rights don't exist, so the current state is correct.
richlv (2024-07-22 20:12:35+00:00): The linked section is not marked as private anymore, though.