piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
discontinuity (2022-10-03 19:06:37+00:00): Ah, danke Hockie! Ich dachte da war die Papierform gemeint... bahh, jetzt soll ich wieder durch meine ganze alte Photos gehen, weil ich gehe davon aus ich habe mehrmals diese Fehler gemacht.
hockie (2022-10-04 15:11:46+00:00): Hallo discontinuity,

kein Problem, ich hatte nur gedacht falls sie noch in Erinnerung hätte was dort wirklich hängt, dass sie es korrigieren könnten.

Ansonsten ist das demnächst eine meine Touren, um in dem Bereich mal wieder Veränderungen und neue Sachen zu erfassen.

Kennen Sie schon overpass-turbo?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key&key=passenger_information_display
Hier gleich mit den fehlerhaften Schlüssel. Einfach auf den zu durchsuchenden Bereich zoomen und oben links auf "Ausführen" klicken. Dann werden alle entsprechenden Ergebnisse zu der Suche abgefragt und angezeigt.
Das geht auch mit allen anderen Schlüsseln und mit Verklüpfungen mehrerer Schlüssel und Werte.

Grüße
Hockie
4004 (2021-12-30 23:34:41+00:00): thanks, this looks much better
amadvance (2022-01-01 22:07:18+00:00): Ciao AlwebHouse,

Questo tratto che hai chiamato "maresana" in realtà è parte del "San Rocco". Ci sono vari video di YouTube che lo confermano.

Ad esempio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grGClNezHWQ 

oppure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KqN-LwR6Fs

Ciao,
Andrea
AlwebHouse (2022-01-01 23:47:52+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
Allora lo chiameremo San Rocco anche se mi permetto di contraddirti in quanto il San Rocco parte più avanti dove si interseca con il Filone. Poi se i signori di Orio gravity park decidono di chiamarlo diversamente non cambia nulla tanto oramai sono diventati i proprietari della Maresana.
amadvance (2022-01-02 17:51:30+00:00): Ciao AlwebHouse,

Concordo che l'atteggiamento degli Orio Gravity può dare fastidio :), ma questo non centra con OpenStreetMap.

Si tratta solo di mettere il nome comunemente usato. Se hai qualche riferimento di video o sito che chiama il primo tratto "Maresana" si possono mettere entrambi. Si può usare qualcosa come "San Rocco / Maresana".

Ciao,
Andrea
4KK (2022-08-23 12:08:30+00:00): The position of this highway or wrong. And not under construction. Right one is already added
user_5359 (2022-01-02 07:09:30+00:00): Hello, may I ask a question about the entry https://www.osm.org/way/245286343? This is the first time in OSM that the language code :ja-Kana is used. Previously there was :ja-Hira and :ja-Latn (see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=%3Aja-). Could this be an accident or Google not being helpful in finding confirmation for the language code?
muramototomoya (2022-01-02 09:35:18+00:00): name:ja-Kana is here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0

Anyway, my tagging was wrong.
It should be name:ja-Latn, not name:ja-Kana.
I'll modify it. Thanks.
VictorIE (2022-01-01 11:14:44+00:00): 'Possibly' some wonky buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211898888
DeBigC (2022-01-01 14:52:02+00:00): Wonky construction I think, but I do see an unclosed one. Oh well, omlettes and broken eggs.
maxolasersquad (2024-12-31 01:33:25+00:00): This changeset adds a lot of problems, like roads that don't exist, and re-classified roads as residential, even though there are no neighborhoods around them. ⌢
Warin61 (2026-03-26 06:03:51+00:00): Hi
Multipolygon relation 13618251 parking 

Better mapped? 
Ways  1017013456,  1017013457, 1017013459 and 1017013458 can al be deleted - they have the wrong rolls anyway and can be replaced by ways 1017013452 and 1017013453 (gardens inside the parking area.)

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13618251 for rolls ... 
And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017013452 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017013453 for the gardens.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-12-31 02:50:50+00:00): These roads don't exist, please tag as proposed and add sources!
sulagaloh (2021-12-31 08:59:47+00:00): Rechtlich liegt die Wiese zwischen Bach und Neubauten innerhalb der im Zusammenhang bebauten Ortsteile (§ 34 BauGB) und ist daher korrekterweise im BayernAtlas als Teil des Ortsgebiets dargestellt.
https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/?lang=de&topic=ba&bgLayer=atkis&catalogNodes=11&E=748193&N=5332211&zoom=14&crosshair=marker
Aber wenn Besserwisser aus der Region das anders sehen, ist man auf OpenStreetMap halt machtlos.
opendcc (2021-12-31 11:54:06+00:00): Die Regel ist einfach: tagging what's on ground. Und das Problem hat eher mit Besserwisserei von ungenauen, ortsfremden Mappern zu tun ...
user_5359 (2022-01-02 06:45:09+00:00): Hello! Has the key localita and
object:street the same meaning. Please have also a look on the translation of the values (specially ...:en, see http://www.osm.org/node/9380531111). This seems to be a copy of the wikidata information.
MaximusIT (2022-01-03 23:30:22+00:00): Hi, yes località has the same meaning. Did forget to clear the value. Thanks for telling.
About the translation: it's the names I found on wikipaedia.
charl3s (2022-01-07 23:07:44+00:00): Wiem, że przebudowa na S, ale nie dodawaj construction/proposed do dróg po których odbywa się ruch, bo sporo nawigacji omijaja dla bezpieczeństwa takie drogi.
charl3s (2022-01-07 23:08:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=53.4269%2C18.5261%3B53.4376%2C18.5452#map=14/53.4419/18.5365
tutaj przykład
charl3s (2022-01-07 23:09:01+00:00): Ten lepszy: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=53.4277%2C18.5203%3B53.4376%2C18.5452#map=14/53.4345/18.5382
adamh (2022-01-01 06:47:54+00:00): The bridge that you've added is across the park boundary and not the stream.
Are you sure you've drawn it in the correct location?
nonscenic (2022-01-01 07:23:55+00:00): Sorry for my mistake. I have corrected it , showing better the shape of the boardwalk as it crosses the creek
woodpeck (2024-12-05 10:16:16+00:00): In this changeset you uploaded https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017015758 which is an exact duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555010205 which you uploaded 4 years earlier. 

There appear to be many more such duplications, e.g. 884940053 duplicates 553868783, 751372653 duplicates 419769015 and so on. Please find and repair these.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:48:14+00:00): ok?
user_5359 (2022-01-01 13:55:11+00:00): Hello! Pleae have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9380572547? What is the meaning of the tag MCC286=Değirmenözü Hidro Elektrik Santrali?
sis651 (2022-01-01 19:54:56+00:00): Aah, sorry. Someway I missytped it. Thanks for notifying. I corrected it.
user_5359 (2021-12-31 07:28:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.

And playground isn't a park (but there could be a playground inside a park)
user_5359 (2021-12-31 07:32:35+00:00): Hello! A railway doesn't have an address. You looking for is_in:city and is_in:state_code. But these keys are hardly used any more, because in the USA the borders of the states and cities are known.
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-01-06 03:01:13+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, it seems to have been detritus from the TIGER import that I'll have to keep an eye out for in the future.
Masyas (2022-01-01 04:51:58+00:00): 欢迎加入OSM常州
村镇建筑编辑方法可以参考桃园新村附近地区
各name部分可以空缺，河流主要以路径来添加名称
tomhukins (2026-03-26 09:17:54+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.

"7 Kw" seems like an incorrect name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9380611791 given https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging%20station suggests socket:type:output might work better for this purpose.
InsertUser (2022-01-01 03:52:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are these names from a visit? The changeset only mentions satellite imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115588547
Capt'n Jim (2022-01-03 00:11:44+00:00): @InsertUser, the names were added from a map created by the actual designer of Leisure Lee, Joe's Creek & Local knowledge (having been there). Sorry, I thought I put that "Local Knowledge" as a source. Bing Aerial Imagery had nothing to do with it. I made lots of separate changes, I guess I didn't realize that I need to "check all the boxes" on each one. I'll pay more attention next time.
InsertUser (2022-01-09 14:36:39+00:00): Unfortunately the bits "added from a map" are probably not OK for OSM unless you have permission from the author. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Capt'n Jim (2022-01-09 18:08:13+00:00): Ok, understood. I will ask the original map owner for permission for the portions obtained from their map. How would I go about reporting it here?
InsertUser (2022-01-11 03:42:53+00:00): I'm not sure how these are usually recorded so I've raised it as a question on the help forum. 

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/83049/documenting-permission-to-use-a-source
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-02 20:05:06+00:00): Hi Hamish,
This was marked as a driveway, which appears to be the case on imagery. Has the driveway been removed?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-13 03:00:49+00:00): Deletion reverted in changeset #116088603 after no response to changeset comment. Please feel free to reach out if you feel this was in error.
ovruni (2021-12-31 05:56:18+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se eliminó el nodo 9335975316 [0] que había agregado el 14 de este mes, donde hay una estructura de paradero. Por lo que quería preguntarte si ya no se utiliza como paradero (en tal caso podría cambiarse de etiqueta para reutilizarlo como banca, pero no eliminarlo).
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335975316
Fer25 (2021-12-31 15:20:12+00:00): Entiendo, si hay una estructura que ya casi no se usa. Antes de llegar al paradero Mercado de Flores hay otro paradero señalizado que si es mas usado por que tiene una escalera que conecta con la Av. Santa Rosa. En ese caso, lo regresaré y aprovecharé en agregar el otro que es usado por las rutas convencionales
ovruni (2021-12-31 23:09:21+00:00): Hay paraderos que no suelen tener ni techo, ni bancas, sin embargo son considerados paraderos porque tanto las empresas de transporte como los usuarios parecen haber acordado que sean usados como paraderos, aunque no haya una señalización, pero esto suelen depender del mapeo en el terreno.
Saludos
RaccoonFederation (2022-01-03 01:04:03+00:00): I'm not familiar with the tagging conventions on dual carriageway junctions, but the map looks a little odd to me. There is a label on the bottom right corner of this changeset saying "Marsh Mills Roundabout" which is half a mile away from the roundabout. I understand this is where the lane for the exit begins but is there any alternative?
Falsernet (2022-01-03 01:14:50+00:00): It just describes where you'd take the exit to reach the junction. If you think it's far away, there doesn't seem to be a convention as to whether you put the splitting point where the lane/s form, or where the markings indicate you should be in lane, or where the solid lines start. So you could change its position to your preference. It's not saying that the junction starts at that point. The convention I do know on its use is on exits, to tag the point you'd turn off, with highway=motorway_junction. I've seen this many times in the context of non-motorway dual carriageways, despite the name. The wiki also states that it's "applicable to other roads". That's a brain dump of what I know. I just add the names and keep it consistent between exits and junctions.
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-01 13:02:53+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
skquinn (2022-05-08 18:05:11+00:00): What is your source for Cypresswood Drive having the ref CR 7432? I have never seen this signed or referred to anywhere.
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-05-21 13:56:58+00:00): It was taken from the FRA GIS record for crossing 675158C -- it could very well be an internal/unsigned ref though.
skquinn (2022-05-21 14:39:44+00:00): It's definitely unsigned as I've driven through here many times and never seen signs with this ref. In fact, Harris County does not sign numbers on their county-maintained roads at all; everything has a name. I'll convert this to ref:unsigned.
skquinn (2022-06-18 20:37:22+00:00): Regarding:

fixme=FRA grade crossing DB says no bells here, even though the rest of the hardware is present...can someone verify this?
ref:fra_crossing=597100E

I can't imagine there being lights but no bells. Is a visual verification of hardware enough or would someone need to observe a train passing through to confirm?
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-06-19 01:56:58+00:00): A visual verification of the bell being present is sufficient (it's generally found atop one or both of the sign/light masts at the crossing)
AngocA (2022-02-17 20:54:48+00:00): Hola Camilo

Has mapeado algunas calles como Living Street, siendo que esas vías como tal no existen en Colombia. Eso está explicado en la guía de mapeo - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear con una sustentación de esto en la página de discusión.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#Living_street. Esas vías se pueden mapear como residential o service, según corresponda.

Si quieres hablar del tema, puedes entrar al canal de telegram @osmco
ivanbranco (2022-01-04 15:48:18+00:00): Hi Matthew,

the tag for gardens is leisure=garden, not place=garden
Kovoschiz (2021-12-31 10:51:44+00:00): Surely something happened with turning a woodland into a cafe.
mattmaxon (2022-03-04 13:09:30+00:00): I haven't been to Trail Cyn Falls in a while but are there really viable hiking trails on the north side of the creek? There maybe some user paths of questionable safety
Maclstr (2022-03-05 18:01:20+00:00): Hi, I can only speak to the area just by Trail Canyon Falls, but yes, I would say they are viable and commonly-used / informal trails to get to the waterfall on the north side. Lots of people (including us, when were there) go northwest on the main trail, eventually find one (of many) crossing points over the river, then loop back to the southeast, where you can get closest to the waterfall. Also it's nice to meet you. I think we've worked on a lot of the same spaces in the greater LA area.
skquinn (2021-12-31 04:32:39+00:00): Oops, this actually came more from a survey than Bing imagery.
user_5359 (2022-01-02 06:20:00+00:00): Hello! Please have look on your changes. What is the meaning of pha=3?
VictorIE (2022-01-02 08:16:22+00:00): Typo :)
skquinn (2022-01-11 06:28:51+00:00): Is there specific street level imagery that would help and/or specific items that need to be surveyed? I live in this area.
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-01-13 04:52:17+00:00): Most of the issues lie further NNW on the line (there are several crossings further out in the sticks with FIXME tags due to bad data)  -- I was able to get a fairly reliable dataset within Houston using aerial/birdseye imagery + what street-level shots were available to augment/verify the grade crossing reports.
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-01-13 05:03:57+00:00): If you want a place to start though, Agg Road crossing (FRA ID 597101L, 
OSM Node 1425821593) SSE of Tomball has a FIXME on it
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-01-13 05:18:16+00:00): Also, closer to home, there are the crossings at Landry Blvd (near Old Louetta Road, FRA ID 597095K, OSM 
Node 3755972488 for the active track) and Cypress Creek Parkway (between TX 249 & Cutten Road, adjacent to Willowbrook Mall, FRA ID 597091H, OSM Nodes 1425821592 & 1425821579) although the last one is more advanced due to the difference between "crossing:barrier=full" and "crossing:barrier=double_half" coming into play
UrbanUnPlanner (2022-01-13 05:29:05+00:00): Last but not least for now, while you're out by Tomball, the Holderrieth Rd (FRA 597100E, OSM Node 1425821570) has a minor FIXME on it, and there's also the issue in Tomball itself of the possible humped crossing warnings on the Main Street/FM2920 crossing (FRA ID 597102T, OSM Node 340144640) -- I left a note where Streetside shows the W10-5 humped crossing warning on the EB approach to be
Heinz_V (2022-01-09 10:28:20+00:00): You made correction to NH309:
1) do not delete mapped ways but make corrections; else the history is completely deleted.
2) each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD228 (2022-01-11 14:42:52+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I will add a new way to make any road dual carriage instead going forward and have added the relations back as suggested
wireguy (2021-12-31 13:41:48+00:00): hi Keith!   nice additions to the map, thanks.   have fun, keep mapping.  two things I noticed...   Some buildings you added in the area had extra nodes or duplicated nodes.  I removed them.   The other item is changeset comments like 'A'.  please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Keith Helbley (2021-12-31 14:54:54+00:00): hey wireguy! thanks for the note! good catch. changeset 'a' is terrible!  I had my browser crash for the 10'th time and was trying to dump the change before it crashed again. sorry about that, and thanks again for the note.  I'm having tons of fun over at: https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/11298/tasks/
fndoder (2021-12-31 09:47:30+00:00): Прошу пояснить, почему удалена дорога https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602634842

По спутниковому снимку она существует.
Тамара@ (2022-01-14 05:46:49+00:00): а что вы смотрите по спутнику? там уже стоит коттедж и дорога со спутника прям по участку проходит..ни чего не смущает? там не дорога, а направление заброшенное в кустах.
fndoder (2022-01-14 15:01:03+00:00): Спасибо за пояснение. Для исключения недопонимания в дальнейшем просьба писать более подробные описания к правкам.

Кроме того, замечу, что дорога типа track и является "направлением". Если бы это была полноценная дорога, она была бы минимум service.
user_5359 (2021-12-31 18:09:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eF4. What is the meaning of the tags 
Bokam=Anusha
VLD146=-
?
VLD146 (2022-01-03 06:59:11+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for bringing it to my notice. The tags are added by mistakenly. Data is corrected now.

Thank you!
🅢🅐🅜🅐🅝➤ (2022-01-16 04:48:51+00:00): سلام؛ 
بر اساس گزارش کاربران نشان، دوربرگردان روبروی وحدت 45  (1017066216)، مسدود شده است. لطفا بر اساس عکس هوایی مجدد آن را رسم نکنید. 
با تشکر 🍀
fndoder (2021-12-31 10:00:25+00:00): Прошу сообщить причину удаления подъезов к воротам.
Тамара@ (2022-01-14 06:00:25+00:00): ссори..подъезды можно вернуть. посчитала, что легковой там не проедет там бардюр высокий. да и ворота закрыты.
user_12625593 (2021-12-31 10:43:55+00:00): Hoi, volgens mij klopt er in de Choorstraat in Utrecht inderdaad iets niet. Nr 16 (van Lier) zit niet tegen Museum Speelklok aan, dit is de oneven zijde. En op de echte nr 16 zit geen Floris van Bommel, die zit op nr 23.
Zijn de anonieme opmerkingen daar ook van jou?
user_12625593 (2021-12-31 10:44:36+00:00): Nr 32 bedoel ik..
user_36790 (2021-12-31 13:41:21+00:00): Aan de huisnummers kom ik normaal gesproken niet, ik ga ervan uit dat deze uit BAG komen en dus kloppen.
Desondanks zag ik dat nummer 16 dubbel voorkomt.
Hoe dit op te lossen?
user_12625593 (2021-12-31 13:52:55+00:00): De nr 16 aan de oneven zijde komt niet uit de BAG, dus die kan en moet weg.
JeroenHoek (2021-12-31 14:19:54+00:00): Let op dat het niet zo is dat alle adressen die niet in de BAG staan ook weg moeten, sommige adressen (in de orde van 1 op de 10.000 of zo) ontbreken in de BAG maar zijn wel in gebruik.

Voorbeeld:

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.1910205,5.8032675,3a,75y,173.63h,93.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sW-tykCN-yOAB5gZK9jTmlQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Een adres in gebruik voor de administratievleugel van een groot ziekenhuis (!), wat in gebruik is, verifieerbaar ter plekke en op websites, maar wat niet in de BAG staat (36 en 40 wel). Iemand van het ziekenhuis zal dat op moeten lossen (ik krijg de juiste persoon er in ieder geval niet te pakken). De gemeente mag het niet op eigen initiatief aan passen namelijk!

Dit puur ter illustratie hoor, hier is het verder compleet correct deze 16 weg te gooien, maar ook bij winkels komt het voor dat hun adres niet formeel (meer) bestaat (ik ben het vandaag nog tegengekomen).
user_36790 (2021-12-31 14:28:38+00:00): Situatie opgelost.
Overigens: veel winkels hier hebben nog geen website toegevoegd, daar is nog iets te doen.
Arnaud Champollion (2022-02-18 12:35:50+00:00): Bonjour il semble que le carrefour a été récemment modifié sur le terrain. Il y aurait une sorte de double rond-point désormais.
Quelqu'un peut-il confirmer et mettre à jour ?
ianlopez1115 (2021-12-31 07:24:37+00:00): street name was added in this changeset, not cellsite and service road
ovruni (2021-12-31 22:07:19+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado una barrera que no parece ser visible desde Mapillary. ¿Cual es la fuente que ha utilizado para agregar este barrera?
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-01 09:15:33+00:00): Hi Ovruni, thanks for reaching out! The barrier is actually visible on Mapillary, on the trail that is close to the street.
ovruni (2022-01-02 04:04:46+00:00): Actualmente las imagenes de Mapillary que existen cerca a "Martín de Paz" muestran imágenes de la Panamericana Sur con imágenes de solamente carros. ¿Puedes indicarme la url donde sale la imagen?
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 06:37:15+00:00): Hi Ovruni, below is the link I used to add the barrier. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-12.11338263010002&lng=-76.97789828290001&z=18.480170740797828&pKey=749479175750799&focus=photo&x=0.23611871847001495&y=0.691828676687511&zoom=3
ovruni (2022-01-02 06:44:09+00:00): Como le había indicado, en ese enlace se logran visibilizar los carros, mas no la reja en Martín de Paz.
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 07:05:24+00:00): Hi Ovruni, I think I misrecognized the fence that surrounding private construction as the barrier. It was actually the view between the white car and the white van. I will take it down right now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Warin61 (2022-01-01 00:03:40+00:00): Hi,

I have corrected the relation 13618816 for Proclamation Track as it had errors

It would be nice to enter the other sports here. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=discus_throw%3Bhammer_throw as a sample.
Тамара@ (2022-01-14 06:25:24+00:00): отвечу на вопросы которые ниже. курирую сервис доставки потому правки вношу по всем городам. основываясь на ОС от водителей, спутниках
ovruni (2021-12-31 22:02:35+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado una barrera que no parece ser visible desde Mapillary. ¿Cual es la fuente que ha utilizado para agregar este barrera?
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-01 09:18:12+00:00): Hi Ovruni, thanks for reaching out! The barrier is actually visible on Mapillary, on the trail that is close to the street.
ovruni (2022-01-02 04:13:20+00:00): Hola, las imagenes de Mapillary que existen cerca a El Cascajal, actualmente muestran barreras de obras que impiden ver la calle desde la Panamaricana Sur. ¿Puede indicarme una url de donde se puede ver la barrera agregada?
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 06:31:59+00:00): Hi Ovruni, below is the link I used to add the barrier. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-12.1219405584&lng=-76.9769236231&z=17&pKey=753059362024311&focus=photo
ovruni (2022-01-02 06:41:40+00:00): Hola, aquí en realidad me refería a la calle Las Dalias. ¿Cual es enlace de Mapillary?
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 07:00:25+00:00): Hi Ovruni, I think I added the barrier on the wrong street. I will delete it right now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Lokai (2022-01-07 04:58:30+00:00): Hallo,

schön, dass du Grenzsteine kartierst und es gut meinst, lies bitte mal den Abschnitt „name ist nur Name“.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Grenzsteine bitte nur in Ausnahmefällen bezeichnen. Es gibt besondere Steine, die sind nur sehr selten.

Gruß

L.
Jørn-osm (2022-01-02 21:52:22+00:00): Bemærk det er "name" der bruges på omrids, ikke "bridge:name".

Add the name of the bridge to the bridge outline (name=*) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=bridge

Se f.eks. denne:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017078080/history
b-holdet (2022-01-03 11:49:57+00:00): De er rettet nu