piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
E de Wit (2022-07-28 10:58:29+00:00): Zie reactie:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=868318#p868318
Kin Sapalot (2022-07-28 14:23:53+00:00): "Maar er is bij mijn weten geen voor de hand liggende manier om de voorgeschiedenis te bekijken."

Tip: openstreetmap.org -> rechts: "pijltje met vraagteken" -> klik op een feature, en onderaan staat een link naar "geschiedenis" daarvan. Bijvoorbeeld de 5 versies van je "camp_site":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081570863#map=15/53.3992/5.2588
BCNorwich (2022-07-27 07:35:05+00:00): Hi, The tag for these bunkers is surface=sand rather than natural=sand as the surface is not a naturally occurring feature.

Regards Bernard
MxxCon (2022-07-27 05:12:25+00:00): Hello.
Is this feature already complete or is construction still going on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124105698
NYC Parks (2022-07-28 17:12:49+00:00): It is complete and open as of July 20: https://www.nycgovparks.org/news/press-releases?id=21994 (along with the new obstacle course, which I do not know how to illustrate)
Patchanka (2022-08-01 13:46:18+00:00): cf discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124106396
Patchanka (2022-08-01 13:45:57+00:00): cf discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124106396
user_15552334 (2022-07-27 21:48:42+00:00): .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124106139
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 02:06:38+00:00): Removed SEO POI from N-5 highway route relation it was nonsensically added to, in changeset 184251043

https://osm.org/changeset/184251043
Patchanka (2022-08-01 13:45:40+00:00): cf discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124106396
Patchanka (2022-08-01 13:44:29+00:00): bonjour
Merci pour la mise à jour du sentier du littoral. Je savais que pas mal de tronçons étaient fermés mais sans aller sur place, difficile de connaitre les détails.
Par contre, pour indiquer que le sentier est fermé, le nom n'est pas la bonne manière de faire. Le nom doit contenir uniquement un... nom !
Pour dire que le chemin est fermé à tout le monde, il faut mettre access=no.
Si le chemin n'existe carrément plus, on peut le supprimer.
Je vous laisse faire les corrections, ou sinon dites moi si vous voulez que je les fasse ou si vous avez besoin d'aide.

Petit rappel sur les noms : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names
Patchanka (2022-08-12 15:16:44+00:00): merci pour la correction !
akadouri (2022-07-26 22:12:10+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM! If you are actually NYC Parks it's great to see the department join the OSM initiative. If you'd like to reach out to local mappers there is a mailing list - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-newyork

as well as a Slack channel - https://slack.openstreetmap.us/!


It looks like you're missing the `building=` tag on the updated feature. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278325868

`building=civic` may be appropriate here, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcivic

There was also already a node for this facility, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2020487653

You may want to move the relevant tags from that node to the building and delete it. I would also add `swimming_pool=yes` to the new building feature.

Happy mapping!
wielandb (2022-07-27 09:45:47+00:00): Hey :)
Kannst du erklären, was du hier getan hast? Dieser Weg ist ein highway=residential, kein hw=path :o
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 10:56:23+00:00): Gude. Im fixme=* Tag steht es. Die Brücke ist zu schmal für Autos (mit width=1.8) und der Hauptzugang zu den Häusern läuft über den Eichelbergweg (der residential ist). highway=path ist hier nur als Platzhalter, deswegen der fixme=*

Das war der Grund. Wie siehst Du das?
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 11:08:49+00:00): Addendum: residential impliziert meiner Meinung nach, dass man den highway in D mit einem Auto (zumindest schmalem) befahren kann (nicht zwangsweise darf)
wielandb (2022-07-27 11:22:58+00:00): Hm... vielleicht muss ich da nochmal nachmessen. 
1.8 ist auf jeden Fall die rechtliche Grenze auf diesem Weg, vllt ist er in wirklichkeit breiter. 

Er darf und wird auch auf jeden Fall von Autos befahren, die über die Walthergasse kommen. Nur hgv ist dort verboten. 
Ich kann mal demnächst ein Foto von der Brücke machen, wenn ich sie vermesse. :)

Wenn path oder ein anderer "Gehwegähnlicher" hw-Wert bleiben soll, sollten wir denke ich vehicle=yes o.ä. hinzufügen.
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 11:33:32+00:00): Oder so. Da war ich dann uU etwas zu schnell mit dem hw=path
wielandb (2022-07-28 17:34:33+00:00): Hab unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3287853 ein Foto gemacht :)
Bierphysik (2022-07-29 15:47:08+00:00): Ok, dann würde ich track oder service vorschlagen
Bierphysik (2022-07-29 15:47:47+00:00): und width=2.4
SherbetS (2022-07-26 17:56:30+00:00): additional sourcing information:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124072849
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Alabama#Potential_Data_Sources
OregonJ (2022-07-26 18:06:24+00:00): Updated paths re: Anns Butte motorized vehicle closure
mavl (2022-07-27 13:19:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет для вокзала в Тюмени название. В действительности у него нет названия. На нём написано название станции "Тюмень". Это название удалено.
BCNorwich (2022-07-28 07:01:12+00:00): Hi, Course outline was dragged off a bit, I've reverted only the outline.

Regards Bernard.
ovruni (2022-07-26 23:15:49+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un objeto ficticio, por lo que se ha revertido.
Saludos
pooh79 (2022-07-29 05:22:29+00:00): Отмените свой явно ложный пакет правок
mat (2025-02-05 12:26:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Il s'est passé 2 ans et demi depuis la mise en place de ces restrictions, sont-elles toujours d'actualité ?
Les travaux sont-ils terminés ?
jleedev (2022-07-26 18:45:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
cytryn (2022-07-27 20:03:26+00:00): Jak tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312991976 się doliczyłeś trzech pięter? ;)
syntex (2022-07-27 21:49:14+00:00): No właśnie się zastanawiałem w trakcie zmieniania czy na pewno są tu 3 piętra, ale w końcu nie skorygowałem xD
jleedev (2022-07-26 18:46:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
emersonveenstra (2022-07-26 18:55:18+00:00): Hi,

Looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8645431, I think you have the lane count reversed, there's 3 lanes forward and 2 backwards there
mamcbain (2022-07-26 19:09:38+00:00): Thanks. I thought I was continuing the feature. I didn't realize the forward/back count.
t_ja (2022-07-26 19:17:36+00:00): Ahoj,
aký má zmysel pridávať duplicitnú adresu (navyše neúplnú), keď je už zaznačená dva roky na budove hneď vedľa?
TomasPear (2022-07-26 19:25:27+00:00): Ahoj,
pochopil som že žiaden. Ospravedlňujem sa za duplicitu, ešte sa učím. Ďakujem za upozornenie aj za úpravu (zmazanie)
Frans S (2022-09-09 15:25:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key and map buildings individually.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124110109
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-24 09:35:58+00:00): this changeset added duplicate tees and also added tee tags to the nodes making up the ways. Make sure to at least check your work after making automated edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124110460
DaveF (2023-03-24 18:09:53+00:00): Thanks for spotting that & letting me know. Should be fixed now.
gpserror (2022-07-30 17:58:15+00:00): Hi, I noticed you put down a bunch of new ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081598198 and it's a duplicate of existing ways underneath of it.  I think I deleted one of them due to the violation but I noticed you had speed info on some of them.  They don't match the speed on existing ways so I'm not sure which one is now correct?  Please comment back.  Need to fix the overlaps.
gpserror (2022-07-30 18:02:53+00:00): I put in a note for myself and others at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3291112 which needs to be closed once this issue is resolved.
gpserror (2022-07-30 22:12:39+00:00): BTW I already deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081598199 before I noticed the extent of the damage...
Doug Shidell (2022-08-01 15:04:47+00:00): I apologize for the overlapping lines.  While working on the speed limit changes, I noticed some missing centerlines. After adding a couple of lines, I realized that a lot of lines were missing. I didn't know what was going on, so I stopped editing. Apparently something major was going on. I didn't know how to undo those edits.

Regarding speed limits: Minneapolis changed most speed limits in the city at least a year ago. The changes I made were based on a GIS file at the URL mentioned in my comments. They reflect the new limits.
chiel douwes (2022-07-26 19:40:23+00:00): I also have some photos with this if it's necessary.
Msiipola (2022-07-27 13:59:28+00:00): Hej! Jag håller på och uppdaterar vägar från NVDB, och när jag försökte ladda upp fick jag många konflikter på objekt du hade ändrat/lagt till.
De flesta av dessa är felpositionerade mer eller mindre, så din bakgrundsbild verkar inte vara kalibrerad.
Dessutom följer inte vägar de positioner som finns i Trafikverkets lager som kan användas som bakgrundsmall.
Exempelvis var det fel på Romtjärnsvägen.

Jag rättar fel som jag hittar.

Om du är av annan åsikt så ändra inget (igen) utan att först har en diskussion med mig.
eggie (2022-07-26 21:17:26+00:00): Hoi.. Je gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je het pad aan een boundary	protected_area hebt vastgeplakt Natura 2000 boundary protected area "Veluwe"

Ik zal het even losmaken :)

Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124111315
Groet
eggie
ArjanJager (2022-07-30 20:54:06+00:00): Bedankt. Dus niet vastmaken aan boundaries etc. Goed om te weten.
Frans S (2022-08-26 11:12:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Each building needs to be mapped individually. Don't call a group of buildings just a residential area.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111352
Frans S (2022-08-26 11:12:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Each building needs to be mapped individually. Don't call a group of buildings just a residential area.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111352
Frans S (2022-08-26 11:12:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Each building needs to be mapped individually. Don't call a group of buildings just a residential area.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111352
eggie (2022-07-26 20:30:53+00:00): Zoek eens in de wiki op hoe parking_space wordt gebruikt.
Dan kun je bv een invalideparkeerplaats taggen.
Ik heb wat aangepast, maar lang niet alles denk ik.
juiste tagging
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
parking:orientation=perpendicular

De schoolnaam en het adres heb ik 2x verwijderd. De adesnode is voldoende.

Waar het probleem zit van vreemde rendering zie ik zo 123 niet. Paar keer ctrl-f5 dan zie je effect hoe ik de parkeerplaatsen heb aangepast
eggie
eggie (2022-07-26 20:31:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056868180
eggie (2022-07-26 20:31:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079840264
eggie (2022-07-26 20:33:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
eggie (2022-07-26 21:11:07+00:00): Met deze query kun je nog verkeerd gebruikte parking_space opsporen en aanpassen 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kt0
eggie (2022-07-26 21:11:46+00:00): even op Uitvoeren klikken
eggie (2022-07-26 21:14:36+00:00): Oke.. maar dan de regel track_type=grade1 verwijderen
Die tagging hoort niet bij een path.. en het betekent asphalt.
gr eggie
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124111535
eggie (2022-07-26 21:29:04+00:00): De tracktype=grade1  heb ik maar verwijderd van het onverharde paadje.
eggie (2022-07-26 21:31:22+00:00): Verduidelijking.. De Koepelweg is een highway=track  met een tracktype=grade3  
.... grade3 is een beetje een tussenvorm van onverhard met wat steenachtig materiaal. grade4 en 5 zijn echt onverhard. 
Een track heeft dus een tracktype  een path niet.
ArjanJager (2022-07-30 20:55:02+00:00): Thanks, ik heb er over gelezen. Was verward doordat er al een grade=1 bij stond.
bergaufsee (2022-07-28 18:44:53+00:00): StefanHRT, wenn du so mit dem Rad die Wilmsstr. Richtung Norden gefahren bist wie du die Radwege gezeichnet hast bist du falsch gefahren. So wie the-asca kurz vor der Steinschneiderstraße es mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081011026 eingezeichnet und extra als note hinterlegt hat "Ab dieser Stelle der gemeinsame Weg (DE:241) auf und es ist ausschließlich DE:239 als Zeichen vorhanden und Markierung verweist auf die Straße." ist es auch mMn aktuell richtig.
Bitte keine alten Mapillary-Bilder als Quelle heranziehen.
the-asca (2022-07-28 23:00:47+00:00): Also das auf der Wilmsstraße jetzt gemappte mit den Fahrradwegen ist so definitiv falsch, ich fahre dort regelmäßig lang.

Es ist zwar richtig, dass dort die Gehwege teils Grasflächen in der Mitte haben und teils auch unterschiedlich farbige Steine haben, aber farbige Steine machen noch keinen Fahrradweg. Die Verkehrsschilder und auch die Fahrbahnmarkierung hier auf der Wilmsstraße kurz vor der Steinschneider sind da sehr eindeutig.

Das ist also definitiv falsch und sollte rückgängig gemacht werden.

Auch die "Korrekturen" am Wald, kann ich so nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Und bezüglich der zusätzlichen Einkehrbung beim Parkplatz bezogen auf die Wege definitiv auch fehlerhaft. Denn die Wege treffen sich da eindeutig nicht bereits im Wald.
the-asca (2022-07-28 23:02:34+00:00): Und bei der Einfahrt mit Tor zw. 49/49a glaube ich ist das Tor eigentlich weiter hinten, sowie wäre es wohl sinnvoll den Einfahrtsweg dann auch mit dem Parkplatz zu verbinden (wenn man ihn schon einzeichnet).
StefanHRT (2022-07-29 03:03:25+00:00): Habe es jetzt komplett revertiert, somit ist der vorher gesetzte Radweg wieder abgehend von einem reinen Fußweg ohne Radfreigabe laut OSM.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-28 05:42:21+00:00): Please provide sources for major deletions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111616
Frans S (2022-08-01 13:35:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111690
SafetyIng (2022-07-28 10:05:22+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your contributions. In the future consider synchronising StreetComplete before travelling long distances, to avoid large changeset areas. More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks in advance!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124111937
Rebelllious (2022-07-28 13:19:10+00:00): I am sorry, I have no idea how that Kyiv change appeared in the changeset. I have not used StreetComplete for a while, but it's configured to push all changes directly to OSM. I would expect all changes to be related to NL only, not Ukraine, as I have not been there since Dec 2021...
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 07:40:21+00:00): > it's configured to push all changes directly to OSM

are you sure that auto-sync is on? And that manual upload is not enabled?
Jakka (2022-07-27 06:55:04+00:00): You added some double information that is alraedy on building area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961427451
pooh79 (2022-07-29 05:22:55+00:00): Отмените свой явно ложный пакет правок
wkdgs (2022-07-27 08:17:38+00:00): Hi,

willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du dazu hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Hier hätte die Straße nicht gelöscht werden müssen. Sie war bereits korrekt als Zufahrtsstraße getaggt. Auch private Grundstückszufahrten können in OSM gemappt werden.

Stattdessen hätte man mit "service=driveway" und "access=private" die Art der Zufahrtsstraße besser beschreiben können:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Ddriveway

Falls du mal dazu kommst, kannst du die Straße ja mit den zusätzlichen Tags wieder hinzufügen.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124112701
Strubbl (2022-08-01 18:34:33+00:00): Hallo, ich habe das mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124359963 mal entsprechend aktualisiert
ortho_is_hot (2022-07-30 14:56:55+00:00): Hi SavageRainbow,

It seems like you've drawn several roads on top of each other, e.g. drawing a duplicate roundabout at the intersection for West Street and Amherst Street. Do you need help to remove or update some of the data?

Feel free to reach out.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
nevw (2022-07-31 04:13:22+00:00): Also...
I see you have deleted the tunnel from Flat Rock Creek between Strathallen Avenue and where it joins the bay. Does this section still flow above ground across the sports fields.
Difficult see from imagery, but the DCS NSW Base Map has the creek going through the wooded areas to the south of the sports fields.
Maradona11 (2022-08-02 04:00:27+00:00): Hi SavageRainbow,
Can you please fix the intersection Baringa Rd and Strathallen Av where it seems to be an overlap?

Cheers
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-07-28 13:39:40+00:00): What you call cleanup, I'd rather call breakage.
Deleting a single way, you've opened 2 landuse relations.
Please, be more careful, and pay attention to the JOSM validation messages.

Cheers,
  Alessandro
RVR015 (2022-07-28 17:50:03+00:00): Thank you Alessandro for the update.
woodpeck (2022-08-23 08:55:02+00:00): Hello Andrey,

you have accidentally added a "mapillary" tag to this node which contains unrelated text. Please clean this up, and try to avoid such mistakes in the future.

Thank you    
Frederik Rammm    
OSMF Data Working Group    
Ticket#2022082310000052
Андрей Кирилов (2022-08-24 13:17:24+00:00): Hello. Okay, I'll try to be more careful.
kepivar (2022-08-15 23:26:22+00:00): Cool, but what does "SAJV" mean?
smaprs (2022-08-16 11:16:17+00:00): Oh sorry, that was a tag I forgot to remove.
boldtrn (2022-09-21 12:30:17+00:00): Die conditional access Werte können so nicht so richtig ausgelesen werden. Das Problem ist, dass die Monate als 3 Buchstaben angegeben werden sollten und zwar der der englischen Monate also anstatt Dez -> Dec.

Vielleicht magst du das noch anpassen?

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-21 14:02:09+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Den Tippfehler korrigiere ich später.
michael60101 (2022-08-01 02:06:30+00:00): Hello, do you have any pictures or articles that mention that River Road is closed to vehicle traffic?
tikex (2022-08-05 07:02:55+00:00): Yep grabbed some photos today. Closed to cars from about 343 River Road to 357 River road. 
https://imgur.com/a/3pJAQ4M
michael60101 (2022-08-05 07:24:47+00:00): Thanks for the pictures. I only asked because I thought it was strange that only this section of River Road is closed. But now it looks like the rest of River Road is marked as closed to vehicle traffic.
tikex (2022-08-05 07:34:17+00:00): All good. Where does it say that it is closed to vehicle traffic? When I look at OSM now it seems to be open to all traffic
michael60101 (2022-08-05 07:43:02+00:00): From what I can see on the default OSM viewer, River Road south of where your pictures were taken was changed from a road to a track. I'm away from my computer at the moment, so I can't check in more detail.
Wolke87 (2022-07-27 06:23:41+00:00): Ja weil ihn unsere Kühe getrampelt haben und hier ein Stier mit Mutterkühen über den Sommer weidet. Ich hatte euch Profis gebeten ihn temporär während der weidesaison zu sperren, aber das passiert nicht. ES IST ZU GEFÄHRLICH !!! versteht das doch