piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 08:20:16+00:00): Hi
I found the overlapping building with service road and it was fixed by PizBernina at node 1427626876
kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102637502
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102525224
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Dimitar155 (2021-04-09 18:36:21+00:00): Hi judylin,

Thanks for mapping these buildings, but please make sure that you square their corners. You can do it by selecting the building and pressing Q.

Regards,
Dimitar155
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 07:55:34+00:00): Hi chenyuyang,
i found some incorrect classification tags and it was fixed by DP24PH,kinly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102552004,
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102525304
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:42:44+00:00): Also reverting this for the secondary roads that don't exist
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-11 13:49:28+00:00): Hello judylin,
As I mentioned elsewhere, I've no idea what most of your changeset comments mean. Can you please explain each one:
"#hotosm-project-10635"
"#covid19"
"#COVWales#gomicron21twsg"
"#gomicron21tw"
"#gomicron21twomtpiepi"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-30 23:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103938152 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
skorasaurus (2021-04-08 18:01:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits but in a couple of your edits, you deleted a feature that had information and then replaced it with one that had less information (for example this parking lot which had tags that meant the parking lot is free to use and has an asphalt surface - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100484506/history) and was replaced with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927484275/history.  It's recommended to usually edit the existing feature and improve it (there are exceptions but this is generally the case).

Again, your edits are generally improving the map. 

If you have any questions, I'd be glad to answer. 

(View https://osmcha.org/changesets/102525643?aoi=69559bce-337a-4a1b-b5d8-38a9cf7e30de with more details).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103365292 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131686 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103365292 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:39:54+00:00): I will revert this because of the imaginary secondary roads that have been added.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
kartonage (2021-04-08 09:46:58+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have deleted almost all buildings before mapping new buildings or improved versions. (as seen in http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102526525). Please try to improve existing buildings even when they do not seem at the right position.  Deleting objects to redraw them in the same way is not fair to previous mappers and not useful when looking at object history. 
Thank you.
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 07:12:34+00:00): Hi mapper,
I found crossing ways ,it is already fixed by mapper MarcyAve at node 1645548017
Kindly check with the corrected changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102567765
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102526541
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:43:58+00:00): also reverting this for the secondary ways that don't exist
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 06:42:36+00:00): Hi hungchang,
I have Fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with  residential  highway at node 8605092572 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102906138.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102527070
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 06:34:49+00:00): Hi VERONICAWANG,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with service highway at node 8628018604,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102905415
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102527075
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:28:31+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102570526
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 06:23:07+00:00): Hi linghuang,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential highway at node 8605104919,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102904522.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102527464
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 06:10:58+00:00): Hi georgelin,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with residential and teritiary highways at 
node 8605106698,node 8605111181,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102903641.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102527669
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 10:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103405594 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 10:55:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103405594 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-11 15:45:49+00:00): Hello  LINCHENGTE and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just to let you know - if you're mapping rectangular buildings, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927497652 , you can square the corners by selecting the building and pressing "q".

Best Regards,
Andy
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 04:43:55+00:00): Hello chyang_M,
I have fixed the alignment, as building polygon overlapping with residential highway at node 8627732315.kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102898547
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102528768
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 10:55:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103405594 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103365292 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 10:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103405594 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
kukułka (2021-04-12 20:11:43+00:00): Cześć. Owszem, kładka jak na zdjęciu powstała, ale nie jest to zamiana brodu, bo bród jest na swoim miejscu, co doskonale widać na zdjęciu, kładka powstała obok. Ktoś jadąc konno na pewno nie skorzysta z kładki, a wielu rowerzystów przy niskim stanie wody przejedzie brodem. Kładka na pewno ne jest strukturą kratownicową. Poza tym dwa dni temu też już była trochę w ruinie, dzisiaj widziałem że ktoś ją naprawił. Przy większym deszczu jej nawierzchnia raczej popłynie. Pozdrawiam
Marek-M (2021-04-12 20:22:21+00:00): Tutaj przyznaję Ci rację, bo kładka faktycznie jest mało stabilna i mało pewna a przejście brodem jest dalej możliwe. Zaraz przywrócę tutaj bród. Dzięki za uwagi!
Marek-M (2021-04-12 20:37:02+00:00): Przywrócenie brodu w changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102827129 - mam nadzieję, że teraz będzie OK.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Kha_nam (2021-04-16 09:31:04+00:00): Hi justinchou
fixed the residential way as it is not necessary 
kindly refer with way927503738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103047321
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102529731
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 09:12:58+00:00): Hi jasonliao
changed the classification from residential to trunk 
kindly refer with way 106769204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102655714
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102529830
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
Becky Candy (2021-05-11 15:53:54+00:00): Great mapping ,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102529855
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 09:03:25+00:00): Hi caryhsu
fixed the over lapping highway and fixed the over lapping polygon kindly refer way 927504369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102916001
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102529889
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
kukułka (2021-04-12 20:11:31+00:00): cześć. 
Dziwne te Twoje edycje. Linia: 688504934 czyli mostek z bali powinien mieć aktualnie oznaczenie bridge=ruins.
Przedstawione zdjęcie jest z przed 2 lat. Cd - Zamiana brodu na kładkę komentuję osobno w Zestaw zmian: 102529627
Marek-M (2021-04-12 20:21:04+00:00): W tej zmianie akurat zmieniałem tylko adres do zdjęcia, żeby było widoczne w serwisach prezentujące takie zdjęcia. W sumie teraz tego przejścia nie sprawdzałem, chociaż z daleka miałem wrażenie, że wygląda tak samo jak na zdjęciu sprzed 2 lat. Oczywiście jeśli uważasz, że otagowanie nie jest prawidłowe, to śmiało poprawiaj :)
kukułka (2021-04-13 08:03:50+00:00): z przed to błąd, powinno być sprzed - to uwaga dla mnie;). Mostek trzeba by poprawić, sprawdzę jeszcze tę ścieżkę w jego kierunku po stronie północnej. W sumie te ścieżki są nielegalne, bo to rezerwat, no ale fizycznie są, przynajmniej ta południowa. Z brodem przywróconym jest super. Co do zdjęć - adresy do zdjęć w pobliskim węźle 6456531515 i obok na tablicach nie działają.
Marek-M (2021-04-13 08:32:14+00:00): Kiedyś chyba źle zrozumiałem jak tagować image=* i jak zrozumiałem, tak mapowałem. Wygląda na to, że powinienem był użyć tagu wikimedia_commons (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons) ale w sumie nie sprawdzałem, jak te zdjęcia będą się wyświetlały na serwisach w Internecie. Zmieniłem dla tych tablic tagi image=>wikimedia_commons w changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102853126 i sprawdzę za jakiś czas, czy bez dodatkowego tagowania *image* zdjęcia gdzieś się pojawią, bo wolałbym podawać adres do wikimedia niż bezpośrednio do zdjęć.
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 07:46:58+00:00): Hi jillyao
fixed the over lapping highway kindly refer 927505647
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102910729
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102530063
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 07:46:58+00:00): Hi jillyao
fixed the over lapping highway kindly refer 927505647
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102910729
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102530063
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364123 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
rivermont (2021-06-01 02:12:44+00:00): Why is everything a driveway though...
dufekin (2021-11-16 02:32:17+00:00): Driveway may not be the correct tag for "everything."  Many of these roads are nonpublic roads that resemble driveways, not residential streets akin to those in urban neighborhoods.  Many such roads don't correspond well to features that I can follow easily on aerial imagery.
rivermont (2021-11-21 02:54:08+00:00): The correct tag for these roads is highway=track. They don't really resemble driveways when they are just tire tracks leading to an oil rig, if anything. Many of them don't even exist anymore
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 23:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103120923 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted a couple of times about their edits.