piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vincent de Phily (2016-02-15 14:51:31+00:00): No problem, we all make mistakes along the way.

Concerning the hotel (and POIs in general), it's pretty much always better to map them as areas if possible. Reducing an area to a node loses information, so don't do that. If the mapped hotel area was indeed too big, you should have changed it geometry to reflect that.

But are you sure that the buildings at the back aren't part of the hotel ? Did you survey that fact ? It is pretty common in the west of ireland for hotels to have dependencies like this. And the original mapper of that feature did so after a survey (see how changeset comments are useful ? :)). I'll invite him over to this discussion.
Vincent de Phily (2016-02-15 14:53:48+00:00): While at it, it the restaurant you added accessible to anybody ? If it is only accessible to hotel guests, it's probably not a great idea to map it like this.
Riggwelter (2016-02-15 22:53:36+00:00): Judging by the hotel web page, combined with Google map street view, it is one building only, and nothing on the web page says that the restaurant is for hotel guests only.
Riggwelter (2016-02-15 22:56:11+00:00): Speaking of changeset comments... I am using potlatch which (apparently?) means I have to jump between view mode and edit mode every time I want to get a chance to add a changeset comment. Not very practical, if that's the only way to do it.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-15 23:02:09+00:00): In Potlatch you can press "c" to close the current changeset - the next time you save you'll get prompted for a new comment.
naoliv (2016-02-10 17:30:07+00:00): rmartignoni, essa ligação é secundária mesmo? Não deveria ser terciária igual o resto das vias nesse local?
rmartignoni (2016-02-10 17:42:36+00:00): naoliv, me desculpe. Começando a contribuir com o projeto. Vou fazer o ajuste. Obrigado
naoliv (2016-02-10 17:46:14+00:00): Sem problema. Se tiver alguma dúvida é so mandar mensagem.
Abraço!
literan (2016-02-11 13:32:56+00:00): там действительно ресторан или это все же тестовая правка?
freeExec (2016-02-11 08:49:18+00:00): Не надо везде вешать фейковые запреты разворотов.
Anto110 (2016-02-11 08:52:55+00:00): Где именно вы увидели фейковый запрет разворота?
freeExec (2016-02-11 10:15:16+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5966675
Anto110 (2016-02-11 10:25:51+00:00): Вы предлагаете там через двойную сплошную разворот разрешить?
freeExec (2016-02-11 10:46:21+00:00): Зачем, по малому кругу
Anto110 (2016-02-11 12:09:46+00:00): ГАИ это будет трактовать как выезд на встречку.
freeExec (2016-02-11 15:19:38+00:00): Вот на [картинке](http://www.vashamashina.ru/picture/cs3.jpg) первый рисунок,можно развернуться даже против одностороннего движения. Вот когда раздельные дороги (как на втором), то видимо да, встречка.
naoliv (2016-02-10 18:07:01+00:00): Rennan, aparentemente a rua que você adicionou está classificada de forma incorreta.
Os tipos de ligação (primary_link, que você utilizou, por exemplo) não devem ser utilizados em rua.
Talvez a rua não devesse ser do tipo terciária, no máximo?
Self-Perfection (2016-02-11 00:05:51+00:00): Проверьте свою правку плиз ( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=37130845 ) , вижу бессмысленные точки например ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3999558437 и другие.

Кстати, скамейкам ещё можно направление указать ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:direction )
Владимир К (2016-02-22 22:28:10+00:00): Да в некоторых местах скамейки как то совсем небрежно набросаны
Polarbear (2016-02-10 23:34:33+00:00): Hallo SAQ1973, der Zufahrtsweg zu einem Parkplatz soll nur als highway=service getaggt werden, also ohne service=parking_aisle. Das kommt nur auf die Verbindungsgassen auf dem Parkplatz selbst. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
Stefano_1973 (2016-02-11 11:29:57+00:00): Ist gemacht; Danke für die Info.
b-unicycling (2022-08-23 20:53:46+00:00): Hi, if you added "stile=g", would you mind specifying what type of stile it is actually? I know it's a long time ago, but maybe you remember. If not, please remove "stile=g", as it is not documented.
dudone (2022-08-25 20:49:09+00:00): Removed.  To old for me to remember.
eggie (2021-08-13 14:09:47+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bijdeze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Pietro69 (2016-03-15 07:39:08+00:00): Non è corretto dare nomi ai sentieri per uso personale.
Pazzaura (2016-03-15 21:46:14+00:00): Ciao, perchè uso personale? è il nome del sentiero usato dalle MTB , che conosconono tutti. Ho aggiunto anche altri nomi nel Finalese e nella zona del Gazzo, le OSM sono molto usate dai ciclisti. Sbaglio?
Pietro69 (2016-03-16 08:31:26+00:00): Ciao. Scusa se mi sono permesso di farti notare la cosa ma tempo fa un tuo collega ciclista aveva fatto la stessa cosa e addirittura aveva usato il Tag cycleway designated e oneway a scendere. Come se fosse una pista ciclabile dedicata. Allora avevo chiesto ai più esperti sulla lista ligure di Openstreetmap e mi avevano confermato i miei dubbi. In pratica il nome del sentiero è corretto indicarlo solo se è stato assegnato da un ente gestore tipo i sentieri dei parchi o quelli segnati dalla FIE. Per esempio alta via o simili. Se il nome è solo conosciuto da una gruppo ristretto di persone non è corretto indicarlo. Se per esempio tu e 20 amici lo chiamate in un modo e io e 20 amici miei in un altro come facciamo? 
Io penso sia così comunque puoi sempre chiedere a tua volta...
Pazzaura (2016-03-16 14:57:06+00:00): Ciao, figurati hai fatto bene. Io vado in MTB ed ho sempre visto i sentieri con i nomi... nei luoghi più famosi per la MTB (come finale ligure) i sentieri hanno tutti il loro nome. Allora ho pensato di aggiungerne qualcuno anche qui vicino a casa, tutto qui. Cmq nessun problema lo lascio senza nome. ciao!
MR-300 (2018-02-22 19:39:46+00:00): Usunąłeś prawdopodobnie omyłkowo węzeł(2782425921) z punktem adresowym Legionów 25 (Wojskowa Komenda Uzupełnień w Mielcu). Przez ostatnie 2 lata nie było w OSM ani tego adresu ani budynku WKU. Dopiero dzisiaj to zauważyłem i naprawiłem.
SomeoneElse (2016-04-02 14:55:34+00:00): Hi,
You've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394223348/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394223347/history from "bureau de change" to "money transfer".  Given that these are both in Heathrow Terminal 3, are you sure that this is correct?  What was the source for the change?
Best Regards,
Andy
Commodoortje (2016-02-10 20:40:53+00:00): bankje aangepast naar betere tagging
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3994283244
Commodoortje (2016-02-11 05:48:23+00:00): Een aanbeveling:
Je gebruikt nu de omschrijving "7-2-2016 gewandeld Garmin" bij het uploaden.
Je kunt beter de mutatie omschrijven wat je gedaan hebt. ;-)
szydzio (2016-02-12 11:11:11+00:00): Witam!Wczoraj zmieniłeś ulicę Pijarską z highway=residential na barier=wire_fence,czyli na płot z komentarzem „Zmiany organizacji ruchu”. Jeśli jest to tylko krótkotrały remont to rozważ raczej użycie tagu access=no, jeśli długotrwały to raczej kombinacja highway=construction + construction=residential.Jeśli płot jest ustawiony na dawnej ulicy to raczej kombinacja highway=residential + barier=wire_fence. W każdym razie ulica nie może zmienić się tylko w sam płot…
pukisach (2016-02-10 21:02:58+00:00): ciclovia
pukisach (2016-02-10 21:03:15+00:00): ciclovia
pukisach (2016-02-10 21:03:23+00:00): ciclovia
firstAid (2016-02-10 22:08:58+00:00): Änderungskommentar ist natürlich Quatsch: Bodenschwellen hinzugefügt wäre korrekt gewesen.
R0bst3r (2016-02-12 11:46:45+00:00): Hi pyram,

razed: wird eigentlich nur im Eisenbahner Bereich eingesetzt. Für alles andere sind die gedacht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
pyram (2016-02-12 15:47:04+00:00): Hast recht. Aber das Wiki ist hier relativ neu und diese Definition kannte es noch nicht.
Wollte es nur nicht gleich ganz löschen, weil es zu viele Mapper gibt, die Dinge nach Luftbild, "Internetrecherge" oder sonstwoher wieder eintragen.
Danke für's verbessern.
jinalfoflia (2016-02-11 06:06:08+00:00): Hi Joseph08,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I came across your edit where you have added name of the road to a node. In OpenStreetMap road names are added to the existing road and not as a separate node on top of it.

 If you intend to rename/name the roads in future, then you should be selecting the entire road and either edit the "name" if it already existing or add name tag to it.

Look in here for more information 
-http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags
 
You can refer this link on how to start editing with ID editor 
-  https://www.mapbox.com/blog/get-on-the-map/ 
-  http://learnosm.org/en/ 

Feel free to get in touch if you have questions. Happy Mapping : )
Nakaner (2016-03-09 14:52:43+00:00): Bitte beachte, dass das Stredax keine zulässige Quelle ist. Das einzige, was wir von der DB verwenden dürfen, sind viele (nicht alle) Datensätze auf data.deutschebahn.com und die Liste der Bahnhofskategorien.
bkr (2016-03-09 20:11:58+00:00): Oh, okay. Danke.
Weißt du, wie da die Regeln genau sind? Dürfte ich es zB benutzen um Daten aus anderen Quellen zu verifizieren? Im Wiki finde ich irgendwie gar nix bzgl Regeln zu Quellen?!
Nakaner (2016-03-09 20:19:14+00:00): Du darfst eine Quelle nur benutzen, wenn du die explizite Erlaubnis zur Nutzung durch den Rechteinhaber hast. (Ansonsten würdest du gegen die Vereinbarung für Mitwirkende verstoßen und die OSMF sowie unsere Datennutzer rechtlich angreifbar machen).

Beachte bitte, dass wir bei OSM nicht nur auf das Urheberrecht (das mit der schöperischen Leistung), sondern auch auf das Datenbankschutzrecht achten. Wir legen grundsätzlich Regeln und Gesetze möglichst konserverativ aus, da jeder Rechtsstreit ein Risiko bedeutet.

Du hast daher eine Quelle als nicht existent zu betrachten, wenn wir keine Erlaubnis dafür haben. Das einzige, was dann noch möglich ist, ist, dass du anhand dieser Quelle mögliche Fehler in OSM findest und diese dann vor Ort (nicht bloß Bing-Luftbild) prüfst.

Die möglichen Quellen findest du unter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Potential_Datasources#Quellen_mit_Bahnbezug
bkr (2016-03-09 20:34:06+00:00): Okay, krass, das wusste ich nicht, dass es so restriktiv ist. Danke. Was machen wir jetzt aus dem Changeset?
Nakaner (2016-03-09 20:38:46+00:00): Ich habe ihn gerade eben revertiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37719593

Noch ein Hinweis: Wir schreiben Abkürzungen aus. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#Abk.C3.BCrzungen_.28nicht_verwenden.21.29
Nakaner (2016-04-28 09:09:45+00:00): Hallo mittelhessen,

die von dir hochgeladenen Grenzen sind leider technisch falsch, ihre Löschung wird deshalb (und weil sie nur geschätzt sind) diskutiert.

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=590453#p590453 (Login mit OSM-Benutzerkonto).

Viele Grüße

Michael
KKS (2016-02-20 18:46:02+00:00): Привіт. Дорога з Жолдаків в Новомутин через ліс, ту яку ти мапив - дійсно unclassified ? чи це просто лісова дорога?  Просто якщо то лісова дорога то має буть track в тегу.
A-lex-W (2016-02-20 19:42:07+00:00): Отрисовывал местность по спутнику, видно что дорога там есть, но проходима ли она - неизвестно, поэтому в подобных местах всегда ставлю unclassified
SomeoneElse (2016-03-19 00:02:35+00:00): Re Westminster, I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/529765 to try and get some comment from the locals.
adrianojbr (2016-02-17 08:55:51+00:00): olá, fabrício. seja bem vindo à comunidade de mapeadores do osm. fiz algumas alterações no local que você adicionou ao mapa, as quais você pode ver em: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=37262020

abraço.
j-wills (2016-02-11 04:21:12+00:00): Ради одного name:eng - целый ченждсет ? ;)))
Max-P-S (2016-02-11 06:10:46+00:00): - Da. Eto problema?
j-wills (2016-02-11 14:07:39+00:00): Еет, просто очень глупо плодить на одну точку - один ченджсет, которых у вас множество
jharpster (2017-02-09 19:30:47+00:00): Hi, I was looking at boundaries in Washington and this one keeps coming up. Are state park boundaries intended to be tagged as Admin_level=4? These are normally reserved for state boundaries.
Glassman (2017-02-10 00:07:59+00:00): No - it should be leisure=park. But If I change it I think it will render green over the water. Let me find some other island parks to see how they are tagged.
Glassman (2017-02-10 00:17:55+00:00): Okay - let's see what I broke. The National Park boundary is gone and the the island now has a park polygon. Hope that fixes it.
naoliv (2016-06-09 13:05:51+00:00): Marcus, "COPAD" é um nome alternativo do "Loteamento dos Farias"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000033666
Marcus Salles (2016-06-15 02:03:09+00:00): Oi. É Assim que está descrito no mapa da Prefeitura de Araçoiaba da Serra.
Estive no local e tem uma placa indicando COPAD. Provavelmente Loteamento dos Farias é o nome oficial diante da PMAS. Copad é o que estã no local.
Abraços,
Ignobilis (2016-02-13 11:44:35+00:00): Why have you deleted the mapping of this forestry? This is data derived from public imagery and does NOT require permission. You have NO justification. This is vandalism.
GisManiac (2016-02-13 14:00:37+00:00): Screw you this is my property
user_5359 (2016-02-11 04:49:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please mark only buildings with the tag buildings, not the whole landuse.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-15 16:11:18+00:00): Not sure what happened here - a node called "Ben" got added into the middle of the Atlantic Ocean by mistake.  Maybe your iPhone was a bit confused about where it was?
manings (2016-03-03 06:24:14+00:00): Reverted by another user: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37314553
ajithkarunaratne (2016-02-11 05:09:23+00:00): Hi Eric,

Congratulations!!!
You have become a one of the four Gold Editors in Sri  Lanka. Hope you would remain in OSM even after the DMC project.
By the way, I have also done a little in Jafna. Could you please improve the POIs there.

Thanks.

Ajith Karunaratne
manings (2016-03-03 06:25:40+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37320530
manings (2016-03-03 06:26:34+00:00): reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37475721
ToeBee (2016-02-27 06:11:50+00:00): Obviously false information was added here. I have reverted it.
manings (2016-02-18 06:45:34+00:00): reverted this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37280989
SomeoneElse (2016-02-18 09:01:15+00:00): Thanks - do their other edits look legitimate to you (I'm thinking of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397192671 , but also many edits in the Philippines?
Endres Pelka (2016-02-19 10:46:22+00:00): Look at this user's changeset descriptions. Is it some cavemen dialect?
SomeoneElse (2016-02-18 09:09:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've added a node for Boston here out by the airport, but there's already a node in the centre of town at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158809705 .
maning (2016-02-23 04:24:34+00:00): @MonumentoDeIsabelle, some of your edits here we flagged by the us community as fictitious.  Can you confirm this are actual edits you see on the ground?
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-February/075569.html
ToeBee (2016-02-27 06:21:04+00:00): I have reverted these changes.
FTA (2016-02-11 21:10:59+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! You seem to have placed this node in the middle of a recreational field. Have you surveyed this business location? There are also some strange key tags associated with this data. For example, Business Hours should really be opening_hours.
EricOlson (2016-02-11 07:06:48+00:00): I inadvertently used the same Changeset comment for this edit as I used for my previous edit; I don't know how to edit my original comment.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-16 04:38:23+00:00): Hi dilwyn. Your edit looks awesome, but I add bridge to highway (id 397206419) due crossing with water body. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142920412). Thank you.
user_5359 (2016-02-11 18:49:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte bei den Gebäudeumriss auch ein building=yes eintragen, damit das Gebäude sichtbar wird.
Hjart (2016-02-11 08:34:55+00:00): Er det her noget du har importeret?
Hjart (2016-02-11 09:44:12+00:00): Jeg vil lige påpege at der er en række detaljer der stærkt indikerer at du ikke har set nærmere på Geodatastyrelsens fotos i forbindelse med det her.
Winbladh (2016-02-11 10:19:57+00:00): øhh, nej - der er hård musearbejde, der kan dog være nogle fejl i optegningen? Er der noget særligt du tænker på?
SomeoneElse (2022-05-21 10:47:43+00:00): Hello Lương Đống Văn,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 6 years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000306508 here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source. 
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2022-05-21 10:48:15+00:00): Xin chào Lương Đống Văn,

Tôi hy vọng bạn không phiền khi hỏi tôi về một bản chỉnh sửa từ 6 năm trước. Trên tập thay đổi này, bạn đã thêm thẻ "source = Google" trên https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000306508 tại đây. Chúng tôi thực sự không thể sử dụng nó làm nguồn trong OSM vì giấy phép của Google không cho phép sử dụng nó ở đây - nó sẽ gây ra sự cố thực sự cho dự án nếu chúng tôi bị phát hiện sử dụng Google Maps làm nguồn.
Nếu đây là nơi bạn quen thuộc, thì "source = local_knowledge" sẽ hoàn toàn ổn.

Trân trọng
Andy Townsend, đại diện cho Nhóm công tác dữ liệu của OSM
R0bst3r (2016-02-14 22:17:40+00:00): Hi xmd5a,
please see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:clothes
Several values should be tagged using ;
clothes=men;women;fashin
Greetings
literan (2016-02-15 15:30:57+00:00): Насчет указания maxspeed в городах/за городом, насколько я понимаю, более правильно указывать не в лоб цифры, а ставить RU:urban или RU:rural. Ибо, если вдруг у нас поменяют максимально разрешенную скорость в городах (а уже давно об этом ведутся разговоры, хотят до 50 снизить) - то кто ж будет все эти цифры менять? а так навигаторы автоматически все поймут.
user_5359 (2016-02-12 19:14:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ich habe mir mal erlaubt das Museum von der Straße ins Gebäude zu verschieben. Die Information im Changeset-Kommentar habe ich als wesentliche Information auch übernommen. Übrigens glaube ich, dass das Museum Gebermuseum und nicht "Geberhaus mit Gebermuseum" heißt.
Hjart (2016-02-11 20:31:03+00:00): Jeg vil mene at det giver god mening at klassificere Engholm Parkvej med tilhørende rundkørsler som tertiary. Man bør ikke slavisk følge validatorens advarsler mm
user_5359 (2016-02-12 19:17:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

Das amenity=hotel habe ich schon ergänzt.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-15 15:50:12+00:00): Just mentioning this in case you're wondering why "The Old Rectory" isn't showing up on OSM's "standard" map - the normal way to add buildings is to trace them as a "closed way", add the tag "building=yes" and then add the name.  

Here's an example not that far away:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172391830
arvdk (2017-12-12 20:42:29+00:00): You added 'motor_vehicle=no'. There is a question here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1094793
luiswoo (2016-02-13 18:10:27+00:00): почему точка place удалена?
Владимир К (2016-02-12 08:31:14+00:00): Что это за мусор в базе?
user_5359 (2016-02-11 18:45:29+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Gebäude in oder über Gebäude können werden in Natur noch in OSM nicht existieren. Und dann wäre es freundlich auch den Knoten Café Kessler in das eingezeichnete Gebäude zu verschieben.
Hjart (2016-02-11 18:50:27+00:00): Because of copyright reasons, Google maps is an absolute no-go when editing OSM. Furthermore Gmaps could be wrong, so you'll have to find other means to support your claim.
Hjart (2016-02-11 18:59:44+00:00): We can legally use Mapillary, but unfortunately Paradisgade isn't covered http://www.mapillary.com/map/search/56.16016916090777/10.20985581248928/17
kegle (2016-02-12 07:55:10+00:00): There is three one-way streets meeting eachother in a junction... This breaks everything which relies on OSM in regards to traveling these streets.

Google Maps show which street is wrong on OSM, so does krak.dk and a dozen other maps, but I'm nothing but happy to prove the obvious again.

Seeing how the City of Aarhus doesn't display street directions on their public streetmap and I didn't want to waste tax payer money on our own GIS team I actually spent some of my free time going by there and taking a damn picture for you.

http://imgur.com/ioKMvU4

Thanks for the lesson in why we shouldn't pick open source solutions for our next project.
kegle (2016-02-12 08:14:28+00:00): http://imgur.com/pIY2fmb
kegle (2016-02-12 08:18:27+00:00): I realized that while the public GIS map of the city of Aarhus doesn't show street directions, it does have photos which show the ways cars are parked.

http://imgur.com/mw2f0WC
Skanderborg Kommune (2016-02-12 08:52:00+00:00): We need this correction to go live asap, as it currently breaks OS2Indberetningen.

https://github.com/os2indberetning/os2indberetning

If you need a credible source you're welcome to call me at +45 87947097 during regular business hours.

Right now there is 4 cities of Denmark who rely on OSM for OS2Indberetning, and if this map can't be updated correctly in a timely manner we'll be forced to move our map source to a proprietary resource where this is not an issue.
Hjart (2016-02-12 09:10:39+00:00): Is på :-). Vi er allesammen hobbyfolk og frivillige, der laver det her i vores fritid. OSM er et helt igennem non-profit projekt uden nogen ansatte overhovedet og vi er her ikke for at sælge nogen noget som helst.

Ændringen er desuden i vores database og så kan OSM ikke gøre mere. Jeg er ikke helt klar over hvem der producerer de tiles/kort i ser på, andet end at det må være nogen der kopierer vores data og laver kort på basis af dem.

Desuden må jeg igen pointere at vi i OSM ikke lovligt kan bruge Gmaps, Krak osv som kilder.
Hjart (2016-02-12 09:13:00+00:00): Jeg formoder i forstår dansk. Ret mig hvis jeg tager fejl.
Skanderborg Kommune (2016-02-12 09:29:10+00:00): Super, tak for hjælpen. Så må vi have fat i Septima, men det er nok fordi de ikke opdaterer kortdata hver dag.