piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
parsd51 (2021-04-04 21:08:19+00:00): Hej Jesper

Velkommen til openstreetmap.

Jeg har tagget brandhanen. Bemærk at name kun bruges om egentlige navne, egenskaber tagges, og er der supplerende beskrivelse kan description bruges.

Jeg synes ikke 250 liter til brandslukning lyder af meget.
Da du har skrevet et fast volumen, har jeg antaget at mængden er begrænset og brugt water_storage tagget, og tagget volumen, men ikke tagget typen af “beholder”.

Link til OSM wiki beskrivelsen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant

Hilsen
parsd51
eggie (2021-04-04 09:16:07+00:00): DagThe Glitch.. Alleen een name=   doet niets in osm. Maak altijd een combinatie met shop=  of office=  

MVG
eggie
Dennis Broers - The Glitch Vlissingen (2021-04-04 09:39:20+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Hoe bedoel je dat? Ik heb nu bestaande punten aangeklikt. Aangegeven dat er een winkel zit (soort winkel uit de lijst) en de naam er bij gezet. Is dat niet voldoende dan?

Dennis
The Glitch
eggie (2021-04-04 09:43:33+00:00): Dag Dennis,

Dit is je edit
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102261659
Je hebt hier nog niet de shop= tag bij gezet. 
Dat moet toevallig bij deze adresnode nog gebeuren... anders zie je niet de naam op de kaart met een winkelsymbool. 
Volgens mij doe je het verder goed.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-04 09:46:09+00:00): Wellicht staat hier wat bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
eggie (2021-04-04 09:58:44+00:00): .. of shop=massage ??
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage

Up to you..
eggie
ALu68 (2021-04-04 10:30:47+00:00): Spielplatz im Spielplatz macht keinen Sinn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54404572
Meskalin (2021-04-15 07:36:34+00:00): hi Alu,
wollte eigentlich bestimmte Geräte wie Wippe, Korbschaukel oder Kleinkindkletterturm hinzufügen. Aber das geht wohl nicht mehr, wenn die ganze Fläche als Playground markiert ist?
Schöne Grüße!
DD1GJ (2021-04-15 08:44:14+00:00): Hallo Alu,

es gibt zwei Möglichkeiten:

Du kannst am bereits eingezeichneten Spielplatz pauschal die vorhandenen Spielgeräte auflisten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground:

Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860356643

Oder du kannst an den jeweiligen Stellen einen Punkt, Linie oder Fläche eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground

Beispiel einer Seilbahn: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628224035

Auf normalen Karten werden diese Elemente nicht angezeigt. Aber wenn jemand eine spezielle Spielplatzkarte machen will, dann sind die Informationen auswertbar vorhanden.

Spielplätze mit Seilbahnen der Region Karlsruhe, auf "Ausführen klicken. Du kannst den Ausschnitt zuvor auf Deine Gegend schieben.

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/169I

Viele Spaß, Joachim
DD1GJ (2021-04-15 08:50:26+00:00): Der erste Link funktioniert nicht korrekt, da der Parser den Doppelpunkt am Ende nicht berücksichtigt. Kopeire die ganze Zeichenfolge:

"https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground:"
ALu68 (2021-04-15 10:18:12+00:00): Es sollte auch mit mehreren Spielgeräten auf einer Fläche funktionieren https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432460918 sofern nicht die genaue Position wichtig ist.
ALu68 (2021-04-15 10:20:08+00:00): Es sollte auch auf einer Fläche mit mehreren Spielgeräten funktionieren https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432460918 , sofern die exakte Position nicht so wichtig ist.
Nzara (2021-04-20 09:06:27+00:00): Hallo
dieser Changset hat einige Waldstrassen mit bridge=yes getaggt, wo nun wirklich keine Brücken sind. War das ein Versehen? Was wolltest du damit ausdrücken?
Gruss
Nzara (2021-05-01 14:27:25+00:00): Ich habe versucht, diese und andere offensichtliche Fehler zu korrigiren. Bitte achte in Zukunft besser darauf, dass deine Änderungen auch korrekt sind. 
Gruss
rthik007 (2021-04-06 06:37:01+00:00): Hi Zoe Tsai, fixed the alignment of node 318824955 as crossing the highways. Kindly refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102376038. Thank you..
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102262433
Tesla (2021-04-04 17:37:00+00:00): Oops! Thanks! Edited the wrong field.
SekeRob (2021-04-06 06:45:33+00:00): Hi there

it's 'motor_vehicle=no' singular not 'motor_vehicles=no' but either way it has created an 'island car' situation for ways east and south of that section (from the Gempelkapelle.), where motor vehicles seemingly are allowed. Nobody noticed because since 7 years ago access=motor_vehicles=no never took effect. Think the control has to be reviwed to determine what the downway permissions should be.
cheers
Jorisbo (2021-04-07 05:21:53+00:00): Hi SekeRob, I just see you already chagend the situation. Thank you, kind regards, Joris
gileri (2021-04-04 21:05:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as placé un passage piéton sur une ligne électrique au lieu de la route ici :https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8592062000

C'est une erreur qui m'arrive souvent aussi, surtout que ni iD ni JOSM ne lève un avertissement pour ça !

Pour éviter ces problèmes ce que je fais c'est que je cache les choses qui sont souvent cachées sous les routes : landuses, frontières, câbles électriques.

Dans iD ça se fait dans le menu "Données cartographiques" à droite.
superrache (2021-04-05 08:55:28+00:00): Bien vu ! J'avais repéré au moment d'envoyer le groupe de modification qu'il y avait un cable électrique modifié mais je ne le voyais pas... merci pour l'astuce dans iD, effectivement on peut décocher les éléments électriques.
MCDA (2021-04-04 21:47:46+00:00): Why did you change these tags?
mueschel (2021-04-04 22:02:46+00:00): Hi,
mobile_phone:technology doesn't exist as a tag yet. Tagging this information as communication:XX is common and already used >1000 times.
MCDA (2021-04-04 22:11:50+00:00): if it is so common, where is this documented?
mueschel (2021-04-04 22:17:22+00:00): Unfortunately I'm not aware of a Wiki page yet...
I consult Taginfo in these cases:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=communication%3A
MCDA (2021-04-04 22:24:19+00:00): Yet there are people using communication:mobile_phone=gsm;umts;lte are you going to mass edit these too?

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/communication%3Amobile_phone#values
mueschel (2021-04-04 22:30:18+00:00): I'm not doing any mass edits. Feel free to use this scheme if you like. As long as there is no accepted proposal, communication:lte=yes and communication:mobile_phone = lte are equally valid.

I only changed these 3 nodes because the tags there were yet another new, different scheme.
MCDA (2021-04-04 22:43:32+00:00): I'd argue that as long as there is no accepted proposal the person collecting the data and placing the node should be able to tag it as they see fit without others making automated edits and trampling over their work.
mueschel (2021-04-05 08:35:27+00:00): This was not an automated edit. I did not delete any information. I changed your tags to an established tagging scheme that is used thousands of times by hundreds of mappers.

If you want to introduce a new tagging scheme, please write a proposal.
MCDA (2021-04-05 12:15:56+00:00): Level0 is an automated "find and replace" tool.  Of course it is used hundreds of times because people like you are going round changing tagging to suit yourself!  

If you are so confident that your tagging is correct, why don't YOU make the proposal and get consensus before you go around changing other peoples work!!

If and when there is consensus regarding this tagging, I am quite capable of finding and correcting my mistakes, I don't need your help!
mueschel (2021-04-05 12:27:49+00:00): Level0 is an editor like any other one. There's nothing automatic there - changing a tag is even more manual work than in JOSM, because you can't edit several nodes at once.

If you want to use 'mobile_phone:technology', feel free to do so. But please keep the common 'communication:XYZ' tags in addition.
Linkid (2021-04-05 14:17:17+00:00): Hi!
Thank you for this contribution.

This building has multiple rooms: one for tennis, one for fencing and one for table tennis. This is why it was tagged as a sports center.
So, if you think leisure=sports_hall is better for this building, it is great. otherwise, you can revert your changeset ;).

Thanks again,
François
kjon (2021-04-07 12:30:19+00:00): Hi François, i think sports_hall does indeed fit better in that context. I'd use leisure=sports_center to tag the entire area of the sports complex (basically the whole street block between Chemin des Sables and the Blvd. Fr. Mitterand)
Linkid (2021-04-08 17:29:37+00:00): Ok, great :).
Colin Smale (2021-04-04 11:00:46+00:00): Hi,
According to Wikipedia, this area is no longer contaminated. I am not sure it is appropriate to tag it as a current hazard. Please consider adjusting your tagging to reflect that.
Thanks!
Colin
mboeringa (2021-04-04 12:13:13+00:00): Hi Colin,

Feel free to do this yourself as part of the British community, if you know a more appropriate tagging. It is just a well known historic event.

Of course, this was bound to be a little bit contentious edit, as establishing the true safety is virtually impossible, considering the type of hazard, and no official guideline seems available (e.g. using the "Search" textbox on something like www.gov.uk or www.gov.scot doesn't turn up any reference to Gruinard Island).

Here in the Netherlands, we have the so called "pestbosjes", small patches of forest often situated well away of farm yards, where carcacesses of diceased sick livestock were buried before a national destruction law came into being in the 50/60's. They still pose a thread, decades on, if accidently not left undisturbed due to redevelopment.
mboeringa (2021-04-04 12:20:28+00:00): I also don't mind if you revert the edit, if you feel that's more appropriate or the easier option to avoid discussions.
Colin Smale (2021-04-04 13:02:54+00:00): Caution is still advised around Pestbosjes as nobody knows what is down there. However this island has been decontaminated and subsequently declared safe. If you agree that the tagging is inappropriate, I consider it inappropriate that you expect me to sort it out!
mboeringa (2021-04-04 14:09:13+00:00): Hi Colin,

I personally do not consider the tagging of this island "inappropriate", considering what happened. 

Establishing whether the decontamination rendered it truely safe to visit, I guess is hard, as people are likely still avoiding the island due to an abundance of caution, and it being private property, and varying opinions related to this.

The only reason I suggested you might pick this up, is that I consider the ultimate say to be with the local communities in these cases.

If you prefer me to rever it, I can do that for you, no problem.
mboeringa (2021-04-04 21:40:44+00:00): "rever" should have been "revert" of course...
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 17:06:45+00:00): Hello,
I'm absolutely sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537390597 isn't a "highway=path" with a name of "ROMAN ROAD".
Best Regards,
Andy
gileri (2021-04-04 20:37:02+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'intégration de l'école, Osmose me suggère souvent d'en ajouter mais je m'y suis pas mis...

Deux petits détails si je peux me permettre :

- La start_date doit suivre le format ISO-8601 (AAAA-MM-JJ) pour éviter les problèmes de confusion jour/mois et mois/jour.
Du coup ici ce serait 1998-07-01 j'imagine

- Le numéro de rue 17 est déjà cartographié, du coup ça fait doublon. Il faudrait en garder qu'un, je pense que le nœud proche de la rue est mieux car il correspond à l'entrée.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2687576222
superrache (2021-04-05 08:48:57+00:00): Bonjour, c'est corrigé
ivanbranco (2021-04-05 09:24:27+00:00): Ciao kohlman,

il tag name=* va utilizzato per i nomi propri dell'elemento. "shortcut to road Capronno Lentate" mi sembra piu' una descrizione.
Vinber (2021-04-19 07:23:11+00:00): Bonjour,
pouvez vous expliquer ce que vous faites ? Cela n'a pas beaucoup de sens !
Par avance merci pour vos retours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102265013
user_5359 (2021-04-06 17:14:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/7837865385/history: Is this really a school or is the following keys a better description?
amenity=language_school
language:en=yes
kogutowicz-mano (2021-04-06 19:08:30+00:00): I just visited this area yesterday. There are blocks of flats here, not a school building. They seems to be an online language tutor company. Check their website: https://angoltanulas.net/.

BTW. Thanks for the fix. My keyboard was switched to Hungarian layout. :-)
limes11 (2021-04-24 20:50:44+00:00): Hi, 

der ganze Weg hier ist als Bruecke erfasst, das stimmt so doch nicht, oder? An der einzigen Stelle, wo man eine Bruecke vermuten koennte, ist eine Furt eingetragen. Gibt es hier nirgendwo eine Bruecke?

VG, Limes
MacLoembish (2021-04-26 11:37:43+00:00): Hallo, 
war tatsächlich als Brücke eingetragen, habe ich gerade raus genommen. Die Brücke ist tatsächlich nur da, wo sich der Weg und der Lehmbach kreuzen.

Gruß
limes11 (2021-04-26 13:07:48+00:00): Hallo, 

sehr gut. Dort, wo die sich kreuzen ist, aber keine Bruecke erfasst, sondern eine Furt. Wenn da ein Bruecke ist, kannst du sie bitte eintragen und die Furt entfernen?

Viele Gruesse, Limes
udarnyk (2021-04-04 23:50:50+00:00): А в Березнівському дендропарку ти що за маячню намалював? https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=102265295 
Вертай назад.
udarnyk (2021-04-05 00:14:07+00:00): Вернув. На майбутнє, будь уважним, думай та слідкуй, що ти робиш
marczoutendijk (2021-12-01 13:59:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3132032
amenity=amenity???
udarnyk (2021-12-01 16:42:15+00:00): fixed
eggie (2021-04-04 11:10:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
woodpeck (2021-06-01 07:27:45+00:00): Dear vootza, in this changeset you have modified the name tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45073278 from Ukrainian to Russian. Given that this street is in the Ukraine, a renaming to Russian should be accompanied by a very good explanation or ideally photographic evidence. In the future, whenever you change any name tag in the Ukraine to Russian, please always provide some form of proof that this name is the primary name on signs.
eggie (2021-04-04 11:12:48+00:00): Dag postma.. Wanneer dit de officieel uitgegeven naam is heb je het correct getagd. Wanneer het alleen de omschrijving is beter name= Vijver Wilhelminapark  verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
ottwiz (2021-04-04 11:33:40+00:00): Will update source, just I'm eating lunch. As of June 5, 2020 AEP Generation Resources Inc. no longer owns or operates Conesville Plant. CCR-related compliance documents are posted and maintained on the publicly available website of Conesville Industrial Park, LLC.
https://www.aep.com/environment/ccr/Conesville
Romwriter (2021-04-09 17:00:55+00:00): Hallo Joernwvm, vielen Dank für die Ergänzung. Ich habe mir erlaubt, den Tippfehler in der Adresse zu ändern und den Flusslauf "Lesum" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/272128) wieder auf seine Bestandteile zurückzuführen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102659495
G_P_J (2021-04-05 21:54:59+00:00): Cześć, wprowadzasz niewłaściwy format adresów. Jeśli miejscowość nie ma ulic, to nazwę miejscowości zapisujemy w tagu addr:place i nie dublujemy tej nazwy w tagu addr:city. Jeśli edytujesz w iD, to tagi możesz wyświetlić rozwijając pole "Wszystkie znaczniki" w menu po lewej stronie. Popraw proszę swoje zmiany. W przeciwnym razie będę musiał je wycofać.
Tomasz Rmn (2021-04-06 06:58:21+00:00): Cześć. Dzięki za informację. Poprawiłem błędną adresację w tym zestawie zmian. Były to chyba trzy/cztery adresy. Zaczynam także poprawiać błędne adresacje, które utworzyłem w przeszłości.
G_P_J (2021-04-06 09:18:45+00:00): Dzięki :)
Warin61 (2022-03-17 03:30:33+00:00): access=no? 

Looks to be a new residential development ... access=private?
DaveF (2021-10-24 18:30:56+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8592210759#map=19/53.98841/-1.55482

Golf holes are meant to be linear ways. Are these golf pins, tees or greens?
dsp (2021-10-24 18:36:38+00:00): These are the flags at the holes on the greens.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-04 12:16:58+00:00): Peržiūrėjau, puikiai! Tik miesto/gatvės nereikia. Parkas neturi adreso.
Domgedas1994 (2021-04-04 12:27:43+00:00): Dar irigacinis griovys po kaire puse, tik nežinau, į kurią pusę teka srovė, gal neteisingai pažymėjau. Pažymėjau ir irigacinį griovį šalia parkelio.
Recoil16 (2021-04-04 12:02:16+00:00): Hey, could you check on this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925848412 ? It is on none of the imagery that I've looked at, but rather in the middle of a service road.
rayleigh1 (2021-04-04 15:26:22+00:00): Seems I missed that one, thanks. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102276611
tornado0910 (2021-04-16 23:52:33+00:00): There was no change in this changeset for the South River Golf Course. The only change you made was to the tags of the entire South River relation, which made it completely disappear from the OSM map. I reverted your edit. Please look into how to tag things, and make sure the comment for your changeset explains exactly what you edited.
osmviborg (2021-04-04 12:37:45+00:00): Denne slags redigering betegnes i OSM terminologi for vandalisme. Tilbageført.
Jillis inactivE (2022-02-01 19:46:05+00:00): Martin, deze woningen bestaan nog geen van allen. Bouwvergunning verleend en grasvelden momenteel.
Martin Borsje (2022-02-01 19:49:01+00:00): Dank je, dat is wss dan nog een resultaat van een proliferate importverzoeker waar een aantal BAGgeraars op het verkeerde been egzet is. Ik revert de changeset.
Nogmaals dank
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-04 12:39:05+00:00): Du vektoriai negali kirsti vienas kito be susikirtime esančio taško (nebent tai tiltas ar tunelis).
ottwiz (2021-04-04 11:58:06+00:00): https://www.aep.com/environment/ccr/Conesville https://conesvilleindustrialpark.com
I tagged wrongly in the source, my bad.
VMPanes (2021-04-04 15:35:38+00:00): Hello, what is the source for the additional toll exit at TPLEX Sison?
adrienandrem (2021-07-31 17:37:21+00:00): Sur l'imagerie on ne distingue que 2 foyers potentiels, ce qui correspond plus à place=isolated_dwelling que place=hamlet
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling#Voir_aussi

Corrigé par https://osm.org/changeset/108951946
adrienandrem (2021-05-29 16:55:40+00:00): Le deuxième nom est déjà renseigné sur l'élément.
Le tag name ne doit contenir qu'une valeur
(https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name).

Corrigé par https://osm.org/changeset/105541428
eggie (2021-04-04 14:33:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
adrienandrem (2021-05-16 13:00:48+00:00): L'élément est déjà présent (https://osm.org/node/8553654693)

Doublon corrigé par https://osm.org/changeset/104079104
aceman444 (2023-10-08 20:59:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181363641
Ako z Ortofotomozaiky viete, ze je to bicycle=designated? A neznamena uz samotne highway=cycleway, ze je to urcene pre bicykle?
Aka je tam dopravna znacka?
Ci len vsade hadzete designated, len preto, ze je tam cycleway,alebo je tam cyklotrasa? Ale v skutocnosti neviete ake je tam situacia a dopravna znacka?
adrienandrem (2021-05-16 12:56:03+00:00): Le nom français est déjà renseigné sur l'élément.
Le tag name ne doit contenir qu'une valeur
(https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_guyane&item=5030&level=1).

Corrigé par https://osm.org/changeset/104078986
adrienandrem (2021-05-16 12:39:37+00:00): Le hameau est déjà présent (https://osm.org/node/8550846717).

Par ailleurs le tag name ne doit contenir qu'une valeur
(https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_guyane&item=5030&level=1)

Corrigé par https://osm.org/changeset/104078656
ff5722 (2021-04-04 20:24:02+00:00): Hallo, weet je zeker dat je op de Alberdalaan en Egypte 80 km/u mag? Kan zijn dat de situatie gewijzigd is, maar lijkt me niet logisch.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.95714959999998&lng=6.166061600000035&z=17&pKey=40lgsRbkPv7LslWjrB21dA&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.9640000034&lng=6.200679671&z=17&pKey=BoaN8oDOujSeqxOuf1wZ0g&focus=photo
DTeelde (2021-04-05 15:15:26+00:00): Hoi,
Op deze plek https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.97241&mlon=6.15110#map=18/52.97241/6.15110
stond op 07-11-2020 een bord einde zone 60 km/h. Vandaar maxspeed=80 op deze wegen. Maar gezien de foto's op Mapillary (en Streetview) is 60 km/h juist(er).
Ik heb zojuist de maxspeed voor deze wegen aangepast naar 60.
ff5722 (2021-04-05 17:33:24+00:00): Helemaal goed, dat bord stond er dan waarschijnlijk vanaf de richting Jubbega, omdat je hier de gemeente Heerenveen verlaat. Hadden ze wel mogen verwijderen toen het aan de overkant ook ooit zone 60 is geworden.
DTeelde (2021-04-06 10:09:55+00:00): Bij de gemeentegrens gaat het wel vaker mis. Fietspaden met aan de ene kant G11 en de andere kant G13.
Mastrick_Mapper (2021-04-04 12:33:51+00:00): This is part 1 of the recreation and alteration process.
adrianojbr (2021-04-05 14:42:55+00:00): Olá, bDekaru! Há separação física entre a highway e os caminhos para bicicletas, por isso foram mapeadas de forma separada. Você entende de forma diferente?
bDekaru (2021-04-05 16:47:00+00:00): Olá! Como a separação física nesses trechos é bem variável(desde ciclovia compartilhada na calçada até apenas uma linha delimitando a ciclovia no acostamento) acho que fica mais claro mapear junto utilizando cycleway=track nas partes com separação e cycleway=lane nas partes que sem separação de acordo com instruções no wiki. O que achas?
bDekaru (2021-04-05 16:54:27+00:00): E fica uma dúvida, tachões constituem separação física da pista? Uma breve pesquisa nos forums do OpenStreetMap e parece que o consenso é que apenas tachões não.
adrianojbr (2021-04-05 22:12:29+00:00): Começando pelo fim: tachões não são separação física, ou seja, não caracterizam ciclovia (mas sim ciclofaixa). Realmente, a separação física é bem variável, porém, quando eu mapeei, eu considerei que na maior parte havia separação física; apenas em pontos de acesso de veículos a separação física é descontinuada (ponto de ônibus, acesso a comércio...). Eu vou fazer a reversão da última alteração. Aí se você tiver disponibilidade e querer mapear de forma diferente os trechos onde não há separação física, pode ficar à vontade. No entanto, o recomendável é mapear como highway=cycleway nos trechos onde há separação física. Eu fiz isso na Rua Amazonas, mas dá muito trabalho, por isso na Rua Itajaí considerei como ciclovia. Já a Rua República Argentina eu havia mapeado antes da conclusão das últimas reformas. Não cheguei a conferir depois que as obras foram concluídas. Ainda, quanto ao uso compartilhado da calçada, havia a orientação para mapear de forma separada, desde que a calçada também fosse mapeada; alternativamente, pode-se incluir tanto as etiquetas para calçada, quando para a ciclovia na própria rua.
adrianojbr (2021-04-05 22:28:24+00:00): Complementando: não sei se vc conhece, mas há uma ferramenta para conferir as alterações efetuadas. A seguir, as alterações que você tinha feito e eu reverti: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=102269260, caso queira aproveitar algo.
eggie (2021-04-04 13:40:07+00:00): Hi Joseph.. Why a pharmacy in the middle of nowhere?

Please reply,

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-04 13:49:06+00:00): reverted by changeset  #102272253
tux67 (2021-04-04 16:46:54+00:00): Also bei der Änderung waren mindestens eine Busroute, eien neue Route aus dem Knotenpunktnetz MG und die Wanderroute betroffen. Wobei bist du jetzt unsicher? Wie wars vorher?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102269769