piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ftrebien (2020-01-23 12:59:46+00:00): Desfiz essas alterações na classificação das rodovias do RS. Siga a classificação aprovada pela comunidade do estado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/RS/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_RS
jtracey (2020-01-18 21:24:00+00:00): Just as a heads-up, this changeset added some weird bugs to paths on the UW campus (now fixed). Not sure what exactly went wrong, but if you do, just keep an eye out in the future. One way to do that is to look at the warnings iD generates, you'll get a yellow warning on the right under "issues" if you introduce problems like these.
abakus_uploader (2020-01-16 23:30:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ftrebien (2020-01-23 12:59:27+00:00): Desfiz essas alterações na classificação das rodovias do RS. Siga a classificação aprovada pela comunidade do estado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/RS/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_RS
laurent-38 (2020-10-26 15:22:16+00:00): Bonjour Nathandco,

Mon attention a été attirée par ta modification sur l’avenue des Fleurs, où tu as visiblement voulu modéliser la présence d’îlots de séparation des 2 voies. Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763979842

Pour ma part, j’estime que la taille modeste de ces îlots ne justifie pas le dédoublement des voies. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#S.C3.A9paration_des_voies_.28un_ou_deux_.22way.22_parall.C3.A8les.29

On peut considérer cette modification comme légitime, mais dans ce cas, il faut l’amener jusqu'au bout : il faudrait préciser que les segment qui longent les îlots sont en sens unique, et n’ont qu’une voie de circulation. En ce qui concerne la voie transverse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763979843), l’utilisation de  	secondary_link ne me paraît pas justifié. Ce tronçon aurait pu être modélisé simplement en prolongeant la voie d'accès au parking.

Cordialement
~~
laurent
xtd (2020-01-20 16:50:55+00:00): Caro, as vias em questão não podem ser classificadas como trunk mas sim como primary mesmo. Por favor, confira a descrição de cada categoria: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:highway
wazzolini (2020-01-20 19:18:25+00:00): Olá. Porém, há outras rodovias (BR 153) em Santa Catarina e quase todas as rodovias no entorno de Passo Fundo e Erechim - RS, que estão classificadas desta forma. Poderia revisá-las também?
4004 (2020-01-19 23:11:36+00:00): обалдеть, неужели наконец достроят эту фабрику джинс
ftrebien (2020-01-25 12:06:32+00:00): Para ser motorway tem que ter no mínimo 10km de extensão, segundo o que está sendo discutido pela comunidade brasileira.
mbethke (2020-01-17 04:10:32+00:00): Hola Alejandra,
please don't change all those lakes to wetlands! As you can often see from one straight-ish edge, these are artificial irrigation reservoirs; Sri Lanka has very few natural lakes. So the reservoirs are usually very shallow, warm, and almost universally overgrown with water plants, so they look more like swamps although they're not. Often people tag them as natural=water, water=lake which isn't strictly right either but close. I usually use landuse=reservoir, reservoir_type=water_storage.

cheers,
Matthias
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 09:36:51+00:00): Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?
Tomas Straupis (2020-01-17 06:38:05+00:00): Jei tikrai reikia peržiūrėti, tai reikia mažesnius pakeitimus daryti :-) Keistas pakeitimas, kur nurodyta, kad maksimalus greitis 30, ritmai šitas kelias https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737950870 turi tokį kelio ženklą?
mbethke (2020-01-17 04:22:24+00:00): Hello again :)
Those "tracks" are proper unpaved residential highways indeed. See wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
"Do not use tracks to represent unpaved streets in built-up areas [1], that would be considered tagging for the renderer. In this situation, classify them as usual according to the conventions in your country, and also provide a surface=* tag."
oba510 (2020-01-20 12:02:07+00:00): Can you take a look at nodes 6571769713 and 6571769714? Something went a little wrong in Alameda. 

The old_railway_operator=[name of the street] tag also got added to Blanding and Clement in another changeset, which seems a little odd. Isn't that part of the old Alameda Beltline? I'm not familiar enough with it to say for sure.
stevea (2020-01-20 15:37:07+00:00): Wow, weird.  I did not knowingly edit in this area, either in this changeset or another.  i did delete the oro tag on ..13 and ..14.  But I couldn't find "Blanding and Clement" (they don't intersect?), nor a stop_position node for them, so I didn't delete what I couldn't find.  If you give me another node # I can do that, or you certainly have my blessing to do so.

I don't know the old Alameda Beltline nor do I really understand what happened here.  Thank you for calling this to my attention!  -stevea
oba510 (2020-01-20 12:10:55+00:00): Looking at this more closely, some more things went wrong in this changeset.  The old_railway_operator tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323745114/history and other places around Sacramento got changed to "Abandoned Railroad"...  The Iron Horse Trail, 105th Ave in San Leandro, The Monterey Bay Coastal Trail, Carson Road in Placerville, and several other places had similar issues.
stevea (2020-01-20 15:57:02+00:00): I have reverted this changeset.  It seems like a JOSM editing error on my part, although I'm not entirely clear what I did wrong.  I will certainly be more careful here and try to keep such edits "more local" rather than statewide.

I apologize for the disruption(s).  -stevea
mbethke (2020-01-17 04:32:06+00:00): Also, parking_aisle ... no :)
Looks like tagging for the renderer, to make that street look smaller, right? It's also a small unpaved street serving all the residential area. highway=service was wrong before already of course.

cheers,
Matthias
kapazao (2020-01-17 00:41:00+00:00): Please read wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=bullfighting
It would be good if you let it as leisure=pitch
Regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79664947
eggie (2020-01-16 20:52:52+00:00): Dag tjoekbezoer.. Een naam alleen doet niets in OSM. Je zult in de wiki moeten kijken welke tag bij deze instelling hoort.
Kijk eens bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare

En meatingroom?  office=company is het al snel.
Dan rendert de naam.
MVG,
Eggie
tjoekbezoer (2020-01-16 20:55:05+00:00): Hoi Eggie, bedankt voor je feedback! Ik zat in de interface te kijken, maar zag daar enkel hospital; dat leek me niet geschikt voor geen van beiden. Ik zal de wiki bekijken voor de juiste tags.
eggie (2020-01-16 21:40:31+00:00): 
. ik begrijp dat dit een praktijk voor verloskunde is? 
In Nederland is dat dan een praktijk voor obstetrie... In Engels obstetry ??
Het is in ieder geval geen gynaecology want dat is een specialist. (arts)
Up to you..!
Gr eggie
tjoekbezoer (2020-01-16 22:03:27+00:00): Klopt, wederom kon ik in de lijst niet de meest geschikte optie vinden dus ik koos voor de beste benadering. Ik heb geleerd dat er meerdere pulldowns zijn waarbij ik veel meer opties te zien krijg als ik iets begin te typen in het zoekveld.

Iig scherpe observatie, bedankt!
Glassman (2020-01-17 23:17:16+00:00): Can you let the new user know what they did wrong? I was just opening their changeset when I discovered you already fixed it. From OSMCha, I could see there was a problem, but not exactly sure what it was.
berndw (2020-01-17 08:44:45+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Warum hast Du die auf den Luftbildern erkennbare Grünfläche gelöscht?
Heini Blödi (2020-01-17 11:17:38+00:00): Oh,sorry.war mein Fehler.
Heini Blödi (2020-01-17 13:43:13+00:00): Ich habe die Fläche wieder eingezeichnet.Nun hoffe ich das der Fehler behoben ist.sorry
berndw (2020-01-18 07:45:36+00:00): Danke, sieht wieder gut aus

Weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM

Bernd
MKnight (2020-05-03 15:38:06+00:00): Moin,
schau Dir doch bitte mal die Werte und Reihenfolge bei turn durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turn#Richtungsweisungen_pro_Fahrspur

Ich habe das hier korrigiert.

Weiterführend gibt es auch einen Zeichenstil (Fahrspurattribute) für lanes in JOSM, wo man sofort sieht, was man da egtl. mappt.
351293 (2020-05-03 15:49:17+00:00): Gude,
wo siehst Du hier denn einen Fehler?
MKnight (2020-05-03 15:53:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764000680/history
351293 (2020-05-03 16:02:45+00:00): Keine Ahnung wieso ich das so hinterlegt habe, aber danke, das war tatsächlich Blödsinn von mir.
tordans (2020-01-16 20:58:22+00:00): Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom
tordans (2020-01-16 20:58:32+00:00): Schritt 1 siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79582395#map=19/52.47857/13.45072
mueschel (2020-01-17 08:26:15+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier ein neues Tag verwendet:
cycleway:protection:right=dashed_line;parking_lane
Im Wiki findet sich bis jetzt anscheinend noch keine Definition wie left/right in diesem Fall zu verstehen sind. Auf einer zweispurigen Straße müsste das dann ja 
cycleway:left:protection:right heißen für die Radspurbegrenzung in "backward" Richtung außen - oder innen? Auf was bezieht sich dann das "right", auf die Richtung der Straße oder die Richtung des Radweges. Ich denke, das sollten wir so schnell wie möglich dokumentieren damit es da keine Verwirrung beim Taggen gibt.

Btw, eine "parking_lane" würde ich nicht als protection einstufen sondern eher als hazard. Aufgehende Türen, ausparkende Autos, Kinder zwischen den Autos ist alles eine zusätzliche Gefahr und kein Schutz.

Grüße
Jan
Supaplex030 (2020-01-17 08:38:30+00:00): Hallo Jan,
ursprünglich habe ich an dieser Stelle "cycleway:right:protection:right" geschrieben (also zweimal :right), es aber dannn noch "gekürzt", da oneway. Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass die Suffixe ":right" oder ":left" auf das jeweils vorherige Tag bezogen interpretiert werden (im von dir angesprochenen Fall also auf "protection"). Aber es kann wohl nicht schaden im Wiki zu empfehlen, immer klar Eigenschaft und Seite gemeinsam zu benennen, um bei ein- und beidseitig befahrenen Spuren nicht durcheinanderzukommen. Hier also dann doch "cycleway:right:protection:right"?

Ich vermerke das Problem mal im Wiki. Das protection-Tagging ist noch recht frisch und befindet sich in der "Testphase", siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Berlin/Verkehrswende/PBL-Notes
Supaplex030 (2020-01-17 08:42:26+00:00): Achso, und die Bezeichnung einer parking_lane als "protection" bezieht sich eher auf die Raumaufteilung bzw. die Trennung verschiedener Verkehrsteilnehmer - das Value "parking_lane" als Gefahr zu interpretieren (erst recht bei buffer=no) steht dir natürlich frei :) Auch in anderen Fällen kann "protection" auf einen eher geringen Schutzstatus hinweisen: Also nicht nur bei "protection=no", sondern z.B. auch bei "protection=surface", womit wir eine lediglich durch Bodengestaltung abgehobene Radwegführung meinen (also de facto kein ausreichender Schutz).
mueschel (2020-01-17 08:53:18+00:00): 'cycleway:right:protection:right' anstelle von 'cycleway:protection:right'  ist korrekt und präziser, aber eher nicht notwendig. Man schreibt ja auch cycleway:surface und nicht immer explizit cycleway:right:surface. Die Tatsache dass es nur einen Radweg gibt steht ja schon im Haupttag cycleway=right.

Ich würde vorschlagen, die Wiki Seite zu cycleway:protection anzulegen und dort sowie bei cycleway:buffer auf eure Dokumentation zu verweisen.
Supaplex030 (2020-01-17 09:58:20+00:00): cycleway:buffer gab es sogar vorher schon (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:buffer), cycleway:protection könnten wir bei Gelegenheit mal anlegen. Allerdings bräuchte es dann wohl auch Seiten für "protection" und "buffer" (ohne cycleway-prefix), für separat gemappte Radwege? (siehe Hasenheide)
mueschel (2020-01-18 15:33:18+00:00): Ja, diese Seiten sollte es auch geben, vermutlich sollten das sogar die "Haupt"-Beschreibungen werden. 
Für sidewalk und footway kann man die Tags wohl auch benutzen, nicht nur für Radwege.
rainerU (2020-01-17 08:39:43+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in Einsingen die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung im oberen Teil des Lämmerwegs von 30 auf 50 korrigiert. Bitte denke beim nächsten mal auch daran, das  zone:maxspeed=DE:30 zu entfernen. 

Ich habe das erledigt, das zone:maxspeed war ohnehin von mir. 

Ich habe auch maxspeed=50 für diese Seitenstrasse gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20019768 
 
Viel Spass beim Mappen
Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79666586
K0NFUZIUS (2020-01-23 17:17:08+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
lieben Dank :) 
Nördlich ist übrigens noch eine oberirdische Stromleitung eingezeichnet welche von der SWU Netze letztes Jahr abgebaut wurde. Ich habe aber keine Ahnung bis wohin die entfernt wurde. Vielleicht weißt Du das ja :-)
Lieben Gruß
Jörg
rainerU (2020-01-24 08:32:13+00:00): Ich weiß das leider auch nicht, komme dort auch nur ein oder zweimal im Jahr vorbei.
fantomas (2023-08-19 05:12:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3837204
flohoff (2022-10-26 08:32:34+00:00): Moin,
ich hab den changeset gesehen und hab  bei der Feuerwache mal nachgekehrt. 

Denn nicht das Gebäude sollte das amenity=fire_station tragen sondern natürlich die gesamtfläche.

Und weil ich dabei war hab ich das Gebäude aus dem ALKIS korrigiert und noch Parkplätze und so zeugs hinterher geworfen.

Kannst ja nochmal gucken.

Flo
PavelChekov (2022-10-31 19:46:13+00:00): Moin,
sieht topp aus!
Grüße
viloan (2020-01-16 21:24:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Kevo (2020-05-30 14:01:48+00:00): Hey there, :)
Just wanted to discuss this change since former Hwy 518 is on the edge between unclassified and tertiary (in my mind).  I'm slightly more in the tertiary classification camp because it ties together the local roads and logging roads and has been built to a higher standard than roads built by the town/district.  Or do you think the traffic volume alone is enough to make it unclassified?  Thoughts?
-Kevin
Glassman (2020-01-17 23:20:07+00:00): Tip: instead of deleting features, see if you can just modify the geometry like you did with the other houses. The other trick is to use the best imagery which can be found in the editor on the right hand side under backgrounds.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79667201
Glassman (2020-01-17 23:20:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79667201
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 09:36:04+00:00): Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?
Leo Slager (2020-01-18 11:28:04+00:00): prima gedaan.
Door het verschuiven van de haltes worden de routerelaties niet beschadigd.
Dat is dus de juiste werkmethode :-)
user_5359 (2020-01-17 05:03:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte sieht Dir nochmal den Unterschied zwischen den Werten von name und name:de an!
user_5359 (2020-01-17 05:05:26+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Könntest Du den Adressknoten bitte in ein Gebäude verschieben?
xrss (2020-01-17 08:31:43+00:00): Erledigt.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-01-23 14:49:59+00:00): Ciao. Le tracce GPX dovrebbero essere ricalcate e non convertite. Qui c'è una sovrabbondanza di nodi. Inoltre "Flow time" non può essere l'odonimo né mi sembra un nome usato in loco dato che è in inglese. Ciao, Andrea
Mtb Explorer 360 (2020-01-23 22:37:41+00:00): ciao, la traccia è stata ricalcata come sempre, forse ho abbondato coi nodi in modo da rendere il più corretto possibile il percorso.
Il tracciato, come molti altri in zona, è dedicato alle mtb e viene dato un nome identificativo, non ha importanza che sia reale o di fantasia, italiano o inglese ;) 
Ti ringrazio!
ciao!!!
Andrea Musuruane (2020-01-24 07:27:05+00:00): Ciao. Non è comunque corretto usare il tag name. Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Nel caso di sentieri devi usare il tag mtb:name. Se fosse un percorso devi fare una relazione con type=route + route=mtb e qui puoi usare il tag name. Ciao, Andrea
RicoElectrico (2024-11-10 14:15:25+00:00): Cześć, coś mi tu się nie zgadza. Tu raczej nie ma ogródków działkowych: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4386810
Jeśli po prostu jest to teren wykorzystywany jako mieszkalny, to usunąłbym go i złączył tereny mieszkalne po obu stronach.
SekeRob (2022-08-31 07:59:17+00:00): Hi,

2 years on, the mess created is still a mess with the result that left half of the overlapping farmland MP relation is NOT RENDERING, no useful note why this work was unfinished as the QA reports the farmland has an unclosed ring. It starts with this long straight vertical line used twice for the same farmland. Can you clarify?

thanks
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2020-01-17 11:31:33+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2020-01-17 23:32:51+00:00): I believe you accidentally added an alley on top of the existing service road. In the future, just add the tags to the existing way. I fixed it back up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79669264
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 09:36:20+00:00): Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?
fomalhaut (2020-01-18 11:25:55+00:00): Hi there :) Thanks for the feedback. I was checking RapiD editor since it obviously allows us to see i.e. missing roads in the area that can be added alongside other edits.

I will try to use iD editor next time for such edits. Out of curiosity, is there any website, tool, or group (besides FB employees) that checks RapiD edits like on a daily basis or you just do it out of self-interest?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 12:43:08+00:00): I don't think FB employees check RapiD edits. You can search for recent edits with OSMCha https://osmcha.mapbox.com/

OSM's strength is that the community provides quality assurances and checks the data. So we're all doing it out of "self interest". I'm sure other people are monitoring thigns toos
osmmaker (2020-01-24 03:00:48+00:00): A connaisance ces 2 ascenceurs n'ont pas disparu subitement !
Faut rappeler que la gare est depuis sa construction sous statut intégral RATP
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 09:35:25+00:00): Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?
fomalhaut (2020-01-18 12:09:12+00:00): Hi Rory. Sure, I will do it next time.

That might be not the best place to ask, but do you know why there are rendered duplicate numbers on building and if we can somehow prevent it? Given that particular building, we have two 11s near each other since we have of course the same 'addr:housenumber' tag on the address node and building.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-18 12:44:25+00:00): The number 11 is displayed twice because it is in the OSM database twice. First as a node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2586613723) and then the house has that number too ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764025962 ).

I suggest deleting the node, and leaving the housenumber on the house
marc__marc (2020-01-21 11:02:11+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763446441
you have added type=associatedStreet on it, but it's a tag for relation only.
you also have 2x no 203
Regards,
Marc
alester (2020-01-17 02:54:41+00:00): I'm curious what your source is for this? It's my understanding that UVic's address is 3800 Finnerty and that covers the entire property. If that's true, then each building doesn't have its own address. You also haven't added a addr:street tag, so it isn't clear what the full address would be even if this building does have a housenumber of 9882.
wireguy (2020-01-18 14:11:19+00:00): Welcome to osm Matt!   
In general it's better to change something instead of deleting and adding nodes/ways/information.   This is to keep a history of why that thing was changed and to let others understand the reasoning behind your change.   Keep up the mapping!    If you have any questions, you can send a message.
viloan (2020-01-17 01:24:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!