piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-12-22 22:09:34+00:00): Oke.. Kijk hier voor de betere achtergronden.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
Mapse verder,
eggie
Leo Slager (2019-12-23 23:15:32+00:00): routerelatie bus 76 was op meerdere plaatsen beschadigd en is weer gerepareerd.
Allroads (2019-12-24 11:35:08+00:00): Bedankt, geen excuus voor. Lastig reden te achterhalen, waarom.
Leo Slager (2019-12-24 14:21:44+00:00): De beschadiging is altijd het gevolg van het opknippen van een highway.
Als de route en de highway een tegengestelde richting hebben, staan de 2 nieuwe wegdelen in die route in de verkeerde volgorde.
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-22 21:39:05+00:00): ? :-)
JoBrad (2019-12-22 21:31:11+00:00): Note that the houses (and the completed roads that I added) show up in Google Maps and Waze, although Waze is more accurate than Google, here.
mapman44 (2019-12-22 22:15:59+00:00): Please note that copying from Google Maps or Waze is a copyright violation. Please removed anything copied from them and any reference to them. Please read the Wiki page on copyrighted materials: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
JoBrad (2019-12-22 22:20:35+00:00): Good to know. I didn’t copy anything from them, just noted them, in case someone wanted to verify it. You could also use the official map of the City of Mount Juliet. https://www.mtjuliet-tn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/79/Official-Street-Map-PDF
mapman44 (2019-12-22 22:20:47+00:00): Also, in the Backgrounds list on the right side of the OSM iD page there are other sources of imagery available. It looks like Mapbox Satellite might work well.
BCNorwich (2019-12-23 09:03:42+00:00): Hi, the name for a POI historic=wreck should be the name of the wrecked vessel. I doubt these four wrecks were formally named Wrecks. In the absence of the formal name no fictitious name should be added. I think you are adding a name for the sake of rendering some script. It is wrong to map for the render especially when obviously incorrect information is added.
Regards Bernard.
JJIglesias (2019-12-23 02:51:35+00:00): Hola.si esa calle cruza varias calles y se empalma en ambos extremos. Como puede ser Noexit=yes ?
Slds
abakus_uploader (2019-12-22 23:30:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
bikingaround244 (2021-11-17 17:11:54+00:00): You did a great job mapping this area! Its been 2 years since your last change set. Come back to OSM!
DaveF (2020-01-06 20:14:13+00:00): Hi Owain
Could you take a look at a few of your edits:
Some old bits of NCN4 have been left behind
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318930#map=19/51.60192/-3.34187

Does NCN4 go along this separate way or is it on the parking aisles?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757973438#map=19/51.60173/-3.34178

On the other side of Catherine Street you deleted a path. Shown Light red at the right hand side here:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=78745325
http://tinyurl.com/yjs75m5n
Has it been blocked up?
Owain Griff (2020-01-09 13:38:44+00:00): Hi DaveF,
1. I have deleted the old incorrect parts of NCN4 which were left behind.
2. There is no clear route of NCN 4 through the parking aisles or the service road - I merely tagged what was there. I have deleted the seperate way and tagged the service road of the car park instead.
3. I deleted the cycle path (the bit you say was red on right hand side) because it was incorrectly drawn to follow a footway so no it hadn't been blocked up. It did not exist in the form that it had been drawn. The way I have drawn it is correct.
Thanks.
DaveF (2020-01-09 17:30:22+00:00): Thanks Owain
I removed a couple of sections under the road A4223 that still had NCN4 references.

I'm confused by your 3rd point. It's this path, highlighted white, that I'm talking about.
https://snipboard.io/mJlvO5.jpg https://snipboard.io/mJlvO5.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/sosg5ub

Roads with restricted vehicle access are best tagged with:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions
How many bike racks are there? If there are four, the capacity should be doubled to eight.
DaveF (2020-01-09 17:46:10+00:00): Hi again
A small problem You tagged the new sections of NCN4 with 'super relation' https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318931 

This contains the three main routes, split to make them more manageable. Most websites would time out when trying to list each way.

The one you require is 'Western 1318930'
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318930
Owain Griff (2020-01-12 23:21:01+00:00): DaveF
With regard to the 3rd point I now know what you mean. I was referring to the other red line on the map you sent, the one by Pontypridd rugby club.
Now I understand the one you mean. 
The footway was incorrectly marked up as a cycle path which it is not and it was tagged NCN 4 which it also was not. Footways are not routinely drawn as a footpath so I deleted when I was cleaning up the mess others has drawn the NCN in at this location.
When I added the cycle parking a few years ago following a visit in person there were 2 stands which I correctly tagged as capacity 4. If you know differently please feel free to alter or update.
Owain Griff (2020-01-12 23:27:19+00:00): I'm not sure what road you are referring to that has restricted access. Feel free to correct something you have found.
Mill Street was already drawn as a pedestrian street so I just extended this line to the area where there is no vehicle acess.
jmilot (2020-01-14 17:56:23+00:00): Hi,

When adding sidewalks in OSM, it is really important to be sure to correctly link them to the nearby roads network. This include crossings and overlapping with driveway or transversal roads. Otherwise, such edits could broke planners relying on OSM. 

Thanks for your time improving OSM !
Carto'Cité (2020-01-02 17:30:17+00:00): Bonjour.
La piste cyclable https://www.osm.org/way/757978431 que tu as ajoutée Place Magenta est-elle vraiment à double sens ? 
Est-elle vraiment séparée de la chaussée au point de justifier un way séparé, ou l'ajout du tag cycleway=track (ou lane) serait-il plus adapté ?
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
Esperanza36 (2020-01-04 13:59:28+00:00): Une piste cyclable à double sens place Gambetta a fait apparition suite aux travaux. Elle est séparée de la chaussée par des sortes de barrières.
Carto'Cité (2020-01-06 08:47:32+00:00): Super, merci pour la confirmation :-)
Althemapper (2021-02-21 04:18:59+00:00): Instead of adding personal information, if you know this area you may add buildings, building numbers, road name.
Akkurator (2020-01-21 02:28:54+00:00): falsches Tagging, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78746245
Peter Elderson (2019-12-23 05:57:48+00:00): Hoi Clemens, als het goed is krijg je dit ook per mail, en dan kan je met een linkje naar dit kommentaar op de changeset springen. 
Je hebt jouw knooppunt verschoven, daarmee heb je tegelijk de landuse vorm waar het aan vastzat veranderd. Je ziet daar in dit geval niks van, omdat er twee dezelfde landusevlakken tegen elkaar aanlagen: beheerd bos tegen beheerd bos, dus die landusegrens was zowizo niet heel belangrijk. (ID waarschuwt hier niet voor omdat het veranderen van landuse geen verboden handeling is.) 
Dus je hoeft het nu niet te verbeteren, maar een volgende keer is het recept: bij het verkeerde punt op de landuse de knooppunttags verwijderen, en bij het nieuwe hoekpunt de knooppunttags toevoegen. Als het nieuwe punt nog niet zou bestaan, dan maak je een nieuw los punt op de plaats waar later de paden elkaar gaan kruisen. Mvg Peter Elderson
Akkurator (2020-01-21 02:27:44+00:00): Hallo sputnic62,
du hast hier in der Gerberstraße Radfahrern das Fahren gegen die Einbahnrichtung untersagt, indem du in einer Einbahnstraße (oneway=yes) die Ausnahme oneway:bicycle=no gelöscht hast.
Warum?
Damit hast du das Gegenteil dessen erreicht, was in deinem Changeset-Kommentar steht.
Das gleiche Problem hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24499534/history
Bitte korrigiere das wieder.
Danke,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2020-01-21 02:40:36+00:00): Hier überall der gleiche Fehler:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78746190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78746077
Akkurator (2020-01-21 02:45:50+00:00): siehe wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway:bicycle
Akkurator (2020-01-24 20:20:47+00:00): Erledigt, danke :-)
baspng (2019-12-26 13:02:02+00:00): Sr. Mapeador,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:amenity - Transcrevo adiante o texto da Descrição de "amenity=grave_yard": "Túmulo, tumba ou sepultura: (utilização rara) parcela individual e pequena onde são sepultadas pessoas e em casos raros, animais. Muitas vezes encontrado próximo a uma igreja ou mesmo dentro da igreja. Os locais com muitas sepulturas não devem ser marcados com esta etiqueta mas sim com a etiqueta de cemitério landuse=cemetery."

Como o texto é autoexplicativo, concluo que a alteração é indevida, sendo, portanto, o correto para este cemitério landuse=cemetery, usada pelo primeiro mapeador.

Quanto a "religion=christian", eu noto que, apesar da predominância cristã, nossos cemitérios (na região) são abertos a todas as religiões. E a Descrição de "landuse=cemetery" diz "sempre que possível". É um indicativo que me leva a concluir que a etiqueta seja recomendada para casos exclusivos.

Obrigado por ter lido.
AjBelnuovo (2019-12-26 14:04:48+00:00): Anteriormente havia duas tags para cemitério , a Cemitério Secular e a Cemitério Paroquial , este que se enquadrava na descrição acima . Quando apareceu a tag Cemitério , lancei a pergunta no grupo OSMBrasil se seria  feita a alteração , sem obter nenhuma resposta .
Quanto a ser cristão , se o cemitério tem um nome de um santo católico apostólico romano , se na maioria das vezes tem dentro do cemitério um local onde há uma cruz ( Cruzeiro ) onde as pessoas acendem velas e fazem orações para os seus mortos e apesar de ser aberto a todas as religiões , como não descrevê-lo como cristão e em alguns casos como católico ?
user_5359 (2019-12-23 06:11:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add two lines without any description and a relation with a wrong type. Could you please describe what you wanted to achieve with the entries?
ElliottPlack (2020-05-05 18:22:41+00:00): I'm thinking this would be better added to the map as an underground pipeline or drain
ElliottPlack (2020-05-06 16:35:56+00:00): I took a look at the storm drain data and it does not remotely follow this path. I recommend reverting this changeset and adding the storm drain separately.
user_5359 (2020-05-06 16:38:16+00:00): done!
ElliottPlack (2020-05-06 18:14:41+00:00): Great! yea the connection between the lake goes SW towards the park.
ElliottPlack (2020-05-06 21:33:07+00:00): @Atom although your changes were done incorrectly, there is indeed a storm drain tunnel down there. I researched the location and added it to the map in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84785297
eggie (2019-12-23 07:27:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Probeer als het even kan op een adresnode te taggen en concreet aan te geven wat je doet.
MVG,
Eggie
mapman44 (2019-12-23 04:53:15+00:00): jwoodke, welcome to OSM. Your edits are generally good but you should review the tagging directions in the Wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course   Specifically note this: "The area between the tee and green where the grass is cut even and short. Do not use the tag landuse=grass is to make the rendering more appealing. Use surface=grass." You'll want to change "landuse" to "surface."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78746738
mapman44 (2019-12-23 04:56:05+00:00): Also, it's good to be a bit more descriptive about your edits. Just saying "golf" doesn't tell us much. You could say something like "adding greens and fairways at Eagle Crest."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78746738
user_5359 (2019-12-23 06:02:53+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/10462812
eggie (2019-12-23 07:30:46+00:00): Dam Wimmaan.. Je kunt voor openingstijden deze tool gebruiken.
De syntaxis altijd UK English
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
eggie (2019-12-23 07:35:16+00:00): Aangepast naar Sa 14:00-17:00
Szymson (2019-12-23 15:50:09+00:00): Jak najbardziej popieram dodanie drugiej jezdni na terenie stacji Shell/myjni i LPG Vega Invest, jednakże zmieniłem ją na dwukierunkową, bo tam akurat nie ma znaków które by wskazywały że jest inaczej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78780771
Russbiggs (2020-10-23 15:16:11+00:00): The four nodes in the changeset don't seem to represent the actual location of these offices. They have good info but without the correct location they don't serve much good, do you know specific building(s) they belong to?
Masyas (2020-01-16 23:22:18+00:00): 机场扩建后能否恢复建筑
tichai (2020-01-16 23:46:57+00:00): Additional info needed.
Masyas (2026-07-21 12:22:14+00:00): 常州机场扩建已完成，请恢复编辑
Warin61 (2019-12-23 06:58:49+00:00): Hi,
There is a node that connects the building to the road on the north wast corner. Remove the node from the building way and see what that does then.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 00:02:45+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10463083 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Szymson (2019-12-23 16:21:29+00:00): Ale ten krawężnik: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755003460/history to ostro wykastrowałeś z zaokrągleń...
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-23 01:42:01+00:00): Additional source: DepEd 2013 Public Schools Masterlist.
mapper377 (2019-12-23 03:24:14+00:00): Changes comment is incorrect. Should say: "Add tags at the Bauer Substation near Frankenmuth, MI. Add layer tags at line connections to the substation. Survey date 2019-12-22."
user_5359 (2019-12-23 05:38:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
jpennycook (2020-04-27 18:40:37+00:00): Hi!

You might want to look at Ludlow Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23485720 again - it's been changed in a subsequent changeset, losing a detail that I would have thought would be important (but I'm not familiar with the area).

Jon
MacLondon (2020-04-29 01:09:59+00:00): Thanks Jon. I've reverted this to a oneway cycle track again as it's definitely a separated oneway contraflow track.

Mac
jpennycook (2020-04-29 08:53:51+00:00): Thanks.

I found it strange that the changeset said that traffic was backing up, as if drivers were using the default OSM view. 

Jon
eggie (2020-04-16 12:01:08+00:00): Nu een edit in Nederland.. daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mapman44 (2019-12-24 23:12:12+00:00): If these are named streets with houses on them why did you change them to track roads? Shouldn't they be unpaved residential roads? Please check the Wiki sections on residential and track roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
ACarlotti (2019-12-24 13:49:10+00:00): You seem to have accidentally moved a node near Bradford as part of this changeset. Was that intended to be a separate changeset, or was the movement just a mistake?
anilredd (2019-12-31 10:11:11+00:00): Hi ACarlotti,

Replying on behalf of unnsyeda@. It was an honest mistake. Will convey same to the mapper and make sure this wouldn't repeat.Please let us know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
anilredd.
JochenOSM (2019-12-23 13:44:54+00:00): Hallo Christof,
du hast auf einem Stück der Hauptstraße hvg=no gesetzt. Sollte das hgv= sein, oder was bedeutet hvg? Falls ja: Da fährt aber regelmäßig ein Tanklaster zur Kaltloch Brauerei. Wenn ich das richtig im Kopf habe ist die ganze Hauptstraße von der Rose bis zum Marktplatz motor_vehicle=destination, oder stehen da inzwischen andere Schilder?
cepesko (2019-12-23 14:07:21+00:00): Hvg no bedeutet, dass ich beim Vorbeilaufen das Schild gesehen hatte: Lkw vorgeschriebene Fahrtrichtung links. Vermutlich hat der Tanklaster von Faust eine Anlieger-Ausnahmegenehmigung zum Biertanken. Der stand auch gestern da. Hvg=destination wäre vielleicht auch möglich, aber wenn da noch ein zweiter Lkw zum Schnatterloch hochfahren will, wird's vielleicht eng und deshalb die Beschilderung.
cepesko (2019-12-23 14:09:26+00:00): natürlich hgv, änder ich.
JochenOSM (2019-12-23 14:15:43+00:00): Verstehe. Ich fände hgv=destination besser, immerhin dürfen auch Umzugslaster usw. da fahren. Wird zwar ggf. eng, aber dafür ist access= ja nicht zuständig. Der Tanklaster darf beim Parken auch der Feuerwehr nicht die Durchfahrt unmöglich machen...
gjall1973 (2019-12-25 09:24:48+00:00): Guten Morgen und Frohe Weihnachten,

ich habe mir einmal Deine Fleißarbeit der letzten Jahre angesehen und muss sagen, RESPEKT!

Allerdings wollte ich jetzt für viele Gebiete, die Du hier um Rathenow herum gemappt hast, den Bildversatz von der Imagery Offset Database herunterladen. Da finde ich aber keine EInträge für diesen Bereich. Hast Du den Offset nicht hochgeladen oder finde ich ihn einfach nur nicht?

Es wäre ja hilfreich, wenn wir alle mit dem gleichen Offset arbeiten würden.

Hast Du einen Link auf die GPS-Referenzpunkte in den Kreisverkehren von Rathenow?

Danke und Gruß
dx125 (2019-12-25 14:08:49+00:00): Hallo und auch schöne Weihnachten!

Ich habe anfangs fast ausschließlich mit "Bing" gemappt, und dann noch mit "Esri" - aber nicht mit "Esri Clarity", denn Letzteres gibt es noch nicht so lange. Damals habe ich selbst nicht genug auf Hintergrundversatz geachtet. Bei Großwudicke und zwischen Premnitz und Döberitz entdeckte ich an "Nähten" der Hintergrundbilder einen Versatz von geschätzt 5 bis 10 Metern. Wo die "Naht" eine Straße querte, war die Straße um die gesamte Straßenbreite versetzt, wie nach einem Erdbeben.  
Ab da habe ich verstärkt nach GPS-Spuren ausgerichtet.
Den Kreisverkehr in Rathenow West habe ich auch versucht genau auszurichten (auch noch ohne "Esri Clarity"). Danach kam die Erkenntnis: Wenn dieser Kreisverkehr jetzt stimmt, dann stimmt die Ausrichtung von dem anderen Gemappten in RN wahrscheinlich nicht...
(Nein, ich habe zu der Imagery Offset Database nichts hochgeladen.)
Inzwischen nutze ich immer vorrangig "Esri Clarity", weil das von allen Hintergrundbildern den geringsten Versatz hat. Nur die Aktualität ist bei "Bing" ein paar Jahre besser, weshalb ich nach dem Mappen mit "Esri Clarity" dann mit "Bing" nochmal gegen checke und ggfs. update, bevor ich hoch lade.
Wenn Du magst, mach mal bitte Folgendes: Lade dir den Kreisverkehr RN-West in JOSM runter einschl. GPS-Daten. 
Schön ran zoomen.
Als Hintergrund zuerst "Bing", dann wechsle zu "Esri", zum Schluss zu "Esri Clarity". 

Viele Grüße
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:16:04+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048365
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:15:35+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048305
jonorossi (2019-12-24 00:34:33+00:00): Thanks for fixing the relation, my bad.
kucai (2020-06-14 05:48:15+00:00): Which imagery did you use for the following road?
758042461
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-06-15 02:17:29+00:00): Seem like she use an old imagery form Maxar Version before the maxar blocked all maxar version imagery in Dec. Current version is different after that blocked, covered by cloud.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%40kevin_bullock/diary/391652
tux67 (2019-12-23 13:38:21+00:00): looks like being a way on a compays provate ground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78759204
ErraticThunder (2019-12-24 11:34:30+00:00): Hi tux67,

Thanks for reviewing my edit. It was an honest mistake.Made the necessary changes  . Refer the change set (78816508) for the modification done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
asnghpi.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:09:32+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048119
aachso (2020-03-04 18:18:46+00:00): Hi, you've tagged this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758045919) as a one-way street with no exit. It doesn't look like it's one-way from aerial images.
klimpetje (2020-03-04 19:14:03+00:00): I guess it looks that way. I actually ran it, and the part that looks like a street is actually muddy surface, this one way part is only an exit to a energy building.
aachso (2020-03-04 20:37:30+00:00): If it's an emergency exit, shouldn't the one-way be towards the road, not towards the building?

Anyway, on recent aerial imagery and  on these photos it's definitely a driveway with a loading dock: https://www.fundainbusiness.nl/bedrijfshal/heerlen/object-49135045-bohr-1/#foto-14

I'll update the street unless you have any objections.
klimpetje (2020-03-04 20:40:34+00:00): i guess driveway with loading dock suits fine
aachso (2020-03-04 21:00:03+00:00): Alright, done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81792506
literan (2019-12-23 18:04:05+00:00): Часовня - это не name. Почитайте, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F Если вы не знаете название объекта, не надо выдумывать его.
bolserslon (2019-12-24 09:10:31+00:00): В приложении StreetComplete, через которое я вносил эту правку, об этом ничего не написано. Вы не могли бы вежливее формулировать свои замечания?
literan (2019-12-24 11:35:25+00:00): что вам показалось невежливым? То, что я вам написал "пожалуйста", а вы в ответной просьбе этого не сделали?
AndersAndersson (2019-12-23 10:34:05+00:00): Hej!
Husen saknar taggar.
building=yes eller liknande borde läggas dit.
user_11418917 (2021-02-24 13:18:44+00:00): I've deleted the name you added to the street. it's not official and you just can't name streets by a business name or a place at that street.
Anton Khorev (2020-10-06 10:34:41+00:00): Сами ставите точку сначала по крайней мере примерно в правильном углу квартала, потом двигаете её в противоположный, потом обратно, потом опять в противоположный.

Я её снова подвину в правильный угол - интересно, сколько она там простоит?
Russ McD (2020-01-25 04:47:07+00:00): Please stop editing our Map - you have deleted the Highway tag from road ฉช.4008.  You either don't know what you are doing or you are destroying data on purpose.  STOP NOW.