piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cquest (2017-02-19 18:30:38+00:00): I've reverted the admin boundary relation that was deleted by mistake...
fx99 (2017-02-20 18:57:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing it. I have no idea how it happend to delete it.
letihu (2017-02-19 15:48:30+00:00): Vergiss bitte nicht, die Schranken immer mit dem Weg zu verbinden ;-)
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4665277155/history#map=19/54.22661/10.35375
habe ich das nachgeholt.
Ich wünsche dir noch viel Spaß bei OSM, und lass dich bitte von meinem Hinweis nicht entmutigen.
Constable (2017-11-10 09:44:00+00:00): Hi Dennis, are you sure about this relation name? This green line has nothing to do with the Bernina, which is few tens of kms south west. I think the name should be "Linea Verde" only, as suggested here http://www.silvestribus.it/smartedit/images/content/Livignosommer17-lowseason-SITO.jpeg
Let me know what do you think.
Thanks
Dennis Nienhueser (2017-11-12 16:30:45+00:00): Hi there,
Bernina in there refers to the first stop, Hotel Bernina, see e.g. https://files.livigno.eu/pdf/servizi/orari_bus_verde_sett2017_v2.pdf
Just "Linea Verde" would be a bit too short, I think, since there are two routes. Maybe change "Bernina" to "H. Bernina" or "Hotel Bernina" in the name? H. as abbreviation for Hotel is used commonly in the buses / timetables in Livigno.

Regards, Dennis
Constable (2017-11-12 17:56:59+00:00): Hi Dennis, thanks for you reply. I realized that Bernina was referred to the Hotel when it was too late, I did already write you at that point, sorry for that.
I think "Hotel Bernina" would be the best choice for the relation name. What about Forcola? Do you agree to replace it with "Campeggi Zona Forcola" as suggested by the timetable?
Talking about the two routes, I don't really agree with the two routes because those bus lines (verde and blu) in Livigno don't really have two end of the line stops, I mean, at the Hotel Bernina the bus just stops as it does at every other stop, it doesn't sit there for a few minutes waiting for the next shift to start.
For that reason I would have added just one relation per each bus line, using the Hotel Bernina stops as a relation start member and Pemont (which is missing from the map but it is located here http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?route=46.54592%2C10.14592%3B) stop as a end of the line (as suggested here http://www.silvestribus.it/smartedit/documents/download/blu_30nov.pdf).
The only problem with a single relation per each line would be given by those road sections ( e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=46.5410%2C10.1395%3B46.5383%2C10.1376#map=18/46.53965/10.13853&layers=TN ) where the bus passes twice, once going north, once going south, because I'm not really sure if adding those road sections twice to the relation, once as a forward role, once as a backward role, would be correct.
Don't worry, I'm not going to merge your relations, I'll add the Pemont stop and move the blue line from this road http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=46.5343%2C10.1331%3B46.5250%2C10.1270 to the main one, as the blu line passes on the same road as the green line does, here http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=46.5339%2C10.1344%3B46.5250%2C10.1272#map=16/46.5294/10.1307&layers=TN
Let me know what do you think, thanks again for your help!
cheers
ne17sg (2026-05-03 12:39:15+00:00): Hi,
Can I query the tag you have used "railway=blockpost"?
In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Interlocking a Blockpost is defined as "a signal box building, where a railway employee manually operates block signalling. Block posts are mapped as a node or an area (the building)."
Which surprised me a bit, but...

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22railway%22%3D%22blockpost%22+global&R shows the 4 you created on this section of line are the only ones tagged in South Africa (not that it is wrong, but consistency of tagging should be important)

From the same wiki page I wondered if railway:signal_box=electronic (or =electric) might be closer as, oddly, signal_box doesn't require a person to be present.  However as signals no longer work is this useful?

An alternative to railway=blockpost (for Kameeldrif at least) could be railway=crossover.

A final alternative would be to propose an amendment to the wiki for railway=blockpost for the South African usage.

Sorry this is a bit long, but I wanted to give you the background to my thinking on seeing the tag - and you answer will have me in checking / adding other tags for locations across South African railways.

Thanks

Nigel

If the employee also operates a level crossing, its building is mapped as a block post, not as a crossing box. "
PeetTheEngineer (2026-07-25 23:31:47+00:00): Oh, that was a long time ago. The block posts are not named. Feel free to change the tags as you wish.
ForstEK (2019-05-21 06:51:16+00:00): Hi, Mg P! You should retag this object https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4665336458/history according approved tagging scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial. For example, instead "man_made=비석" we usually use "historic=memorial"
jaap de vries (2017-03-27 08:15:27+00:00): Ik zie dat je de fotozaak hebt veranderd, hierbij zag ik dat je de postcode los hebt gemaakt. Bij OSM is het gebruikelijk om de postcode aan elkaar te laten 1234AA. Daarnaast zag ik dat je de naam-nl ook hebt ingevuld, op zich niet verkeerd maar bij name heb je dit ook al eens gedaan, dan komt het dus dubbel in het systeem.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

mocht er vragen zijn dan kan je die vragen via het forum.
ToniE (2017-02-05 13:51:45+00:00): Hallo Truderinger,

willkommen bei OSM.

Ich habe Deinen Punkt wieder gelöscht, da das gesamte Gebäude schon als (privates) Parkhaus gemapped war. Privat: daher erscheint das "P Siemens AG" auf der Karte etwas blasser.

Viel Spass noch
Toni
Andrea Musuruane (2017-02-07 16:51:18+00:00): Ciao, le strade che hai modificato non possono essere classificate come highway=secondary ovvero come strade di importanza regionale. Le imposto come unclassified. Per maggiori informazioni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway
stephankn (2017-02-11 15:18:56+00:00): what did you try to do here? Especially way 472322394?
Микола Фендак (2017-02-11 15:26:08+00:00): я роблю зміни в карті у зв'язку із змінами на місцевості чи з уточненням і доповненням даних (бо я тут живу). Конкретно по 472322394 не скажу, бо не знаю, як це знайти.
stephankn (2017-02-12 23:07:30+00:00): You added many artificial polygons. That is certainly nothing on the ground. Why did you add this?
Микола Фендак (2017-02-13 20:00:45+00:00): You are in Facebook?
There will be more convenient to communicate.
My akaund - https://www.facebook.com/fendakk
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-02-01 12:23:49+00:00): a user deleted many roads you added in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131862032/
Eberth (2017-02-07 13:59:21+00:00): amenity=school reicht nicht. Du musst noch building=school ergänzen. Sonst wird das Gebäude auf der Karte nciht dargestellt.
surveyor54 (2017-02-07 13:19:53+00:00): Hi MicrosoftDE,
 
bitte keine landuses mit Straßen oder Bahnlinien verkleben, weil
dies sehr schlecht zu warten ist.Da ist schon viel im Forum diskutiert worden.
 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31845
  
OSMI hat hier einen Fehler entdeckt, der schwer zu finden und zu bereinigen ist.
 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.92871&lat=49.82487&zoom=8&opacity=0.68
 
Könntest du das bitte erledigen?
 
Dann noch, bitte immer einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar über die Änderungen, bzw. Neuerungen des hochgeladenen Änderungssatze geben. "Verbesserungen" ist ein bisschen schwach.
 
Und bitte immer ein Datenquelle für die Änderungen angeben, (Bing, survey, Ortskenntnis, track, Fotos, ....) dann kann über die Qualität der Daten auch eine Aussage getroffen werden. 
 
Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2017-02-07 13:22:53+00:00): Hier noch einem der Link mit dem Fehler, der  o. g. Ausschnitt war schlecht gewählt:
 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.21434&lat=50.33152&zoom=17&opacity=0.68
pawelkowalski (2017-02-05 14:27:42+00:00): Proszę o przywrócenie informacji o istnieniu trawiastego pasa startowego.
Hjart (2017-02-06 17:59:59+00:00): Bemærk at der i forvejen var et cycleway=track på Lind Hovedgade, som angiver at  der er en cykelsti langs den. Effekten af dette kan ses på bl.a. cykelkortet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45829651#map=16/56.1062/8.9767&layers=C (de blå stiplede linier).
Se også https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
Hjart (2017-02-06 18:03:32+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at slette det stykke cykelsti du har lavet idet den løse ende forårsagede en fejlmarkering på https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi (routinglaget)
Nakaner-repair (2017-02-07 19:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45895227 where the changeset comment is: Revert removal of building=* from multi-store car parks by 'Graf Westerholt' because it was critized by the community of the German forum. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57239
0000FF berries (2017-02-05 14:26:39+00:00): This is a revert of changeset 44950893. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44950893
Nakaner-repair (2017-02-07 19:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45895227 where the changeset comment is: Revert removal of building=* from multi-store car parks by 'Graf Westerholt' because it was critized by the community of the German forum. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57239
geow (2017-02-05 15:43:00+00:00): Lieber Graf Westerholt, ein Parkhaus ist ein Gebäude im Sinne der Länderbauordnungen und wird deshalb als building=yes erfasst, siehe 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebäude 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkhaus
Auch im englischen Wiki besteht mit 
parking=multi-storey ->	
"Two or more levels of parking decks in a building structure." eindeutig ein Bezug zu Gebäuden.
Wenn OSMAnd oder andere Anwendungen die Parkmöglichkeit nicht darstellen, kannst du dort anregen, es zu ändern. In der Standardkarte (OSM-carto) wird korrekt ein P auf dem Gebäude gerendert, z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28128281
Deine großflächigen Änderungen sind aktuell auch Thema im deutschen OSM-Forum, wo nahezu einstimmig für building=yes plädiert wird.
Wir würden uns daher freuen, wenn du angesichts der genannten Argumente deine Änderungen rückgängig machen würdest.

Möglicherweise hast du meine gleich lautende Nachricht von heute 11:35 im CS  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6540533 übersehen.
 
Falls nicht, würden wir dich bitten die dargelegten Gründe zu akzeptieren oder stichhaltige Gegenargumente in die Diskussion einzubringen.

Danke 
geow
Fortepc (2017-02-07 22:56:02+00:00): There was no reason to remove those tags. They were accurate information relevant to the POIs they were attached to.
mueschel (2017-02-08 11:49:11+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45848069
OSM is not a map of non-existing graphics in some game.
Fortepc (2017-02-08 17:27:39+00:00): I was not mapping ingame graphics. I was tagging real world objects referencing that they also exist in the ARG. It's just as relevant as referencing their facebook pages that you didn't remove.
löcknitzpaddler (2017-02-11 08:31:44+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen im Gebäudebestand in und um Fangschleuse. Einen Verbesserungsvorschlag möchte ich aber doch anbringen. Deine aufgenommen Gebäude weisen sehr unregelmäßige Formen auf - für DE sehr ungewöhnlich. IM ID.Editor kannst du ein ausgewähltes Gebäude mit dem Tastenkürzel S rechtwinklig ausrichten.
Grüße,
löcknitzpaddler
cRaIgalLAn (2017-02-05 20:56:30+00:00): Thank you rorym, for noticing and repairing the errors - the power of crowd-sourcing is demonstrated again. I'm glad you were working in the area - Kenya is badly undermapped.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-06 08:46:39+00:00): No problem! 🙂 We all have to chip in, and we can make things better
권율임 (2017-02-05 14:54:18+00:00): ㅇㅇ
naoliv (2017-02-05 15:02:39+00:00): sazrodrigo, por que está havendo tanta duplicidade e necessidade de remover objetos?
sazrodrigo (2017-02-05 23:06:12+00:00): Esta base de informações não é muito atualizada e, portanto, existem edifícios que foram demolidos que ainda aparecem, ou mesmo edifícios que já haviam sido inseridos por outros usuários. No caso de edifícios que já estavam no OSM, mas estava com geometria muito irregular, eu copiei as tags e transferi para os que foram inseridos. Tomei o cuidado para não haver perda de informações com as exclusões.
smaprs (2017-02-05 23:20:34+00:00): Olá Rodrigo, que bom. Será muito importante documentar e conversar com a comunidade sobre estas importações. Dê uma olhada nas regas do OpenStreetMap sobre importações, abaixo, e exemplo de documentação que fiz nas importações de Porto Alegre (eu também submeti a proposta à comunidade brasileira).  
Você encontrará mais informações aqui:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Import/Guidelines  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Porto_Alegre,_Rio_Grande_do_Sul/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_PMPA  
  
É muito importante para o bom funcionamento do mapeamento seguir estes passos.

Sobre tudo conversarmos no canal de contato da comunidade no talk-list, onde colocamos todas as propostas em discussão:  
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/
Aleks-Berlin (2017-02-07 13:04:40+00:00): Hi JLZ. please follow the OSM-guidelines for wikipedia key.  wikipedia="lang:Name"
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Merci, Alex
Warin61 (2018-11-02 22:42:29+00:00): Hi,
Abbreviations are not good in OSM. So the name is Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. 

This is not an embassy nor a consulate. It is a government office.
stephankn (2017-03-21 00:06:34+00:00): some of your buildings overlap
Kengaru (2017-02-24 00:09:57+00:00): name 	Отделение связи 95006
name:ru 	Отделение связи 295006
что из них верно?
Dima_S (2017-02-24 05:44:03+00:00): Все индексы в Крыму начинаются на "2". Исправил.
literan (2017-02-06 12:29:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. service=driveway это тег для дорожки, ведущей к одиночному владению (например, к коттеджу в коттеджном поселке или к дачному домику). Для внутридворовых проездов этот тег не используют. Я здесь поправлю.
Javierpf (2018-03-26 16:48:13+00:00): estaba viendo una serie de segmentos que creaste pero sin tag. No parecieran que esten bien. Parece la extension de algunos limites. Cual es la razon por la que los creaste? Raro que no no pusiste tag.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-25 07:24:35+00:00): Hello mr_gameul,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The data you added doesn't exists in imagery. But the imagery is out of date and assuming that you added recent data. Can you verify on this please.

Regards,

Upendra.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:10:14+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:10:08+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-13 19:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48656854 where the changeset comment is: Revert HourOftheWulf imports/mechanical edits after multiple complaints from Dutch community, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1347
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:10:03+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
RoterEmil (2017-02-08 23:38:56+00:00): Hallo "roald-linus", ist "Haus der Sekundarstufe" wirklich ein Eigenname. Und wenn, wovon genau? Derzeit steht der Name ja gewissermaßen im "luftleeren Raum". ;)
Ggf. wäre ein alt_name für dieses Gebäude besser geeignet?

Schöne Grüße
roald-linus (2017-02-09 05:50:49+00:00): das Haus heißt tatsächlich so, bzw. wird von der Schule (http://friedenauer-gemeinschaftsschule.de/home) so genannt

das muss aber so nicht bleiben, das ist mittlerweile die 3. oder 4. Namensänderung innerhalb der letzten 10 Jahre
RoterEmil (2017-02-09 09:16:29+00:00): wenn die Schule meint ;)
ich hab den Namen aber dennoch mal zum Gebäude (w95262182) angefügt, damit er nicht allein und ohne Zusammenhang steht (CS 45941552). Bei besseren Ideen, kann's natürlich auch gern verfeinert/verbessert werden
alphensebezorger (2017-02-06 18:50:34+00:00): Hier voeg je 7 nieuwe winkels toe aan OSM.Wat is de bron van deze gegevens? Weet je zeker dat die voor OSM gebruikt mag worden?
HourOfTheWulf (2017-02-06 21:00:51+00:00): De gegevens zijn publiek domein en ze mogen gebruikt worden.
alphensebezorger (2017-02-06 21:14:38+00:00): Wat is de bron?
HourOfTheWulf (2017-02-07 05:04:38+00:00): Ik heb bij alle zeven winkels een bed gekocht.
Maciej9 (2024-06-16 20:59:44+00:00): Parking prywatny, ale ogólnodostępny, więc dlaczego access=private?
Adam_Piszczek (2024-06-19 07:52:32+00:00): To  siedem lat temu , był prywatny,ostatnio nie sprawdzałem to teraz nie wiem jak tam wygląda.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:09:29+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
GerdP (2017-09-06 14:34:05+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo oneway=CV-642
on several ways. I assume you wanted to change ref instead?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rv7
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:09:20+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-13 19:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48656854 where the changeset comment is: Revert HourOftheWulf imports/mechanical edits after multiple complaints from Dutch community, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1347
mueschel (2017-02-08 12:06:33+00:00): Hi,
please update your maps.me app. Yours has a bug and adds a wrong tag:
"banner_url = https://is.gd/UoIIyn"
chillly (2017-02-05 17:49:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the updates. We don't use the name  to describe thinks. If it has no name we don't use one. To mark a pub as being closed, just remove the name and amenity=pub tag from the object. If it doesn't have a pub tag any more it isn't a pub.

HTH
chillly (2017-02-05 17:50:41+00:00): Looking again you used Maps.me. You might a more powerful editor to make the changes I suggested.
chillly (2017-02-05 17:52:12+00:00): Please don't use the name tag to describe something, only to display the name.

If you can't make the edit (because you need a better editor for example) you could add a note to describe the change needed.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:09:13+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
Math1985 (2017-02-05 21:20:13+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor het toevoegen van de winkels! Ziet er goed uit zo.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:09:08+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
5m4u9 (2017-02-05 23:31:23+00:00): desconocía la existencia de este balneario, ya lo mejoré
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:09:00+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
SomeoneElse (2024-01-14 11:40:44+00:00): Hello - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6950474/history is a bit short of an international route? Was it perhaps something else?
Best Regards, Andy
GerdP (2017-09-05 14:58:10+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed this area because there are lots of overlapping landuse=residential areas.
It seems that you have mapped buildings with this tag?
I also wonder if the position is correct, the sat images show an offset of ~35 m.
Some roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472374801
seem to be very differnt from the sat images. Also, this  way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477212904 doesn't look like a service area. I assume you meant highway=service ? 
Before you use a sat image as background please make sure to correct the offset in JOSM using GPS or Strava layers.
EdwinCaldon (2017-09-06 19:58:44+00:00): In that moment I didn't have sat images, but some points are already in a correct way, for the others I'm workng on it. Thanks.
ChrissW-R1 (2017-02-05 18:02:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/852615
DaveF (2017-02-05 18:33:13+00:00): Why have you deleted the building?
BCNorwich (2017-02-05 18:42:16+00:00): I beg your pardon my mistake. There was a duplicate node on the entrance. When I inspected it I saw the two outlines and deleted one of them. After your prompt and closer inspection I found the duplicate node. 
Building now restored and extra node removed.
DaveF (2017-02-05 18:45:50+00:00): Thanks
Владимир К (2017-02-06 07:44:52+00:00): Почему же глупость?
Dima_S (2017-02-06 10:14:19+00:00): Потому что вся данная территория (не конкретно взятый удаленный кусочек, а весь мемориальный комплекс) предназначена для пешеходов. И весь комплекс при этом прорисован пешеходными дорожками. Помечать небольшой кусочек большой территории линией (не областью, а именно линией) и обозначать линию в том виде, как она была, "пешеходной улицей", лично я нахожу, мягко говоря, несколько странным. Если Вы считаете, что я не прав, просьба выполнить откат правки.
Владимир К (2017-02-06 10:26:32+00:00): Таки вы не правы примерно во всём. разве что добавить/заменить area:highway=pedestrian, но это вкусовщина. откатываю. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=ru
Dima_S (2017-02-06 10:38:49+00:00): Странно, я не прав, да еще и во всем, но при этом Вы даете ссылку на страницу, которая меня же в моей правоте и убеждает...
Владимир К (2017-02-06 10:45:41+00:00): что вас смущает?
Владимир К (2017-02-06 10:51:23+00:00): Можно сменить pedestrian на footway, если хотите. Суть не изменится
Dima_S (2017-02-06 10:53:55+00:00): Смущает то, что тут по сути area, а был footway, да еще по периметру данного пятачка. Вероятно мне нужно было не удалить, а просто сменить тип объекта...
Владимир К (2017-02-06 10:58:03+00:00): там стоял area=yes и показывался он на рендере как сейчас. Вообще, в осм нет такого площадных объектов, есть только замкнутый веи, которые в зависимости от тега рендерятся или в линию или в площадной объект. При добавлении area=yes к тегам highway получается площадной объект. Я так понял, вы ориентируетесь на то, что пишет редактор на сайте, да?
Dima_S (2017-02-06 11:04:53+00:00): Я так понял, что мне надо больше спать... )))
Да, глянул на него, дальше голова не работала (((
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:02:55+00:00): Hi Peter Carlsen, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Aleks-Berlin (2017-06-08 13:44:44+00:00): Hi Seat, you put a typo to way/7074612 .
sidewalk=wikidata is not ok. Please check. KR, Alex
eggie (2017-02-05 20:57:20+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Niet alles wat groen is in de stad is Leisure=park. Het bestaat uit bv landuse=grass en landuse= forest, natural=water. Daaroverheen ligt dan als een deken Leisure=park. Veel parken zijn niet helemaal goed gemapt in Nijmegen. 
Het park Galgenveld zal ik wat aanpassen.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2017-02-13 20:44:22+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here.  I'm just trying to understand some changes in this area, and noticed that here you've removed the wikipedia / wikidata link for this village and also the "name:az".  Was there a reason for that?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-02-06 08:27:20+00:00): Proszę nie psuć adresów! Proszę nie przepisywać ręcznie adresów z węzłów na obrysy! 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Powinienem wycofać tę edycję, jednak tym razem ją poprawię - proszę się poprawić sensowniej mapować.