piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
puma515 (2022-04-01 14:34:25+00:00): As I have now understood, this had to be discussed with the local community. I just wanted to have a uniform procedure for the creation here. I come from Germany. This kind of cultural landscape is very widespread in North and West Germany. Before I changed anything, I had discussed this with the German Community.
With us, these types of field hedges are called ``Knick´´ to view the German wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallhecke

The fact that you use as an addition to distinguish the hedges types: barrier=hedge+ hedge=hedge bank was not my idea but comes from the German community. Previously, these were kind of field hedges created as many different things.
before that they were created very differently e.b.: barrier=hedge or barrier=hedge_bank or partly as very narrow natural areas with the type scrub / wood / forest It was then also told that it makes sense to adapt the wiki. Also it has been written several times that it is a general problem that there are always contradictions to the same things in the wiki and that should be adapted. 

The problem is simply that I assumed that something was discussed in the German community that is enough to change it in the English wiki. That the interpretation differs from country to country was not known to me but I was pointed out yesterday by another user. 

Accordingly, I will now reset the English wiki of Hedge wiede to the stand before I edited it and adapt it for hedge_bank so that you can read there that it is used for this hedge type in Germany.

Find after my revision the data are better overall but if you want I can change all of my adapted objects outside of Germany also that there is only barrier=hedge

After this experience, I will no longer work outside of Germany in the future.
puma515 (2022-04-01 15:08:55+00:00): Since I can no longer reset this, I have rewritten the Wikis.
so that it is pointed out that it is only accepted by the German community and you should discuss it with others before using it.
 Please check if the English wikis is ok now.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge_bank

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hedge%3Dhedge_bank

it would be great who there would be in the future with the many small unclear things in OSM times uniform rules to create and tag.
Casey_boy (2022-04-07 13:41:41+00:00): The usage of hedge=* was relatively small until this change set (5k uses to 55k) and 93.7% of uses are now hedge=hedge_bank. 

The use of hedge as a key remains undocumented. This probably should have had wider discussion for example on the tagging mailing list or a proposal.
puma515 (2022-04-08 00:57:07+00:00): I don't know how they come up with such numbers with this edit only 1059 objects have been adjusted and no 53k Please read the detailed comments above yours. As I have already written there, I also know in the meantime that every community in Europe uses the tags partly differently. That is why the Europe-wide processing of mine was wrong. the day does not come from me that was discussed in the forum of the German community.

I am not familiar with tagging mailing list or a proposal.  Read this for the first time. Since it is accepted in the forum of the germany community as a day to distinguish the Nordeutschen knicks from garden hedges I see here also no problem which I can solve.

I Find after my revision the data are better overall but if you want I can change all of my adapted objects outside of Germany also that there is only barrier=hedge
nevw (2022-03-31 04:09:47+00:00): Hi
please note that we don't have permission to use Google street level imagery or Google Maps to map the OSM
nevw (2022-03-31 04:19:42+00:00): Please disregard as Mapillary imagery is able to be used and confirms clearance.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:39:27+00:00): `name=` is the most common name in existing name, not the original or what you think is correct. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-27 12:22:01+00:00): 朋友你好
在你的这个changeset中你为“大学城南二路”添加了“ref=一联络线”这个标签
我觉得这并不恰当，您有什么必须这样做的理由吗？
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-27 12:32:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120257771

我在这里面暂时移除了这个“一联络线”的编号，还是期待您的意见，如果您觉得这个一定要是“一联络线”，也欢迎您驳斥我。感谢。希望能有讨论的成果。
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:39:01+00:00): `name=` is the most common name in use, not what you think is correct. Record this in OHM, or your own map. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Udarian (2022-03-31 02:37:16+00:00): I also updated tagging on some roads and did some tiger clean up. more work to do in the area.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:38:23+00:00): There is no sense in removing Wong Chuk Hang referred to by everyone. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Rainero (2022-04-09 10:51:49+00:00): Hallo rms_SMAR,  
die Haltestelle hier hatte das Attribut Obergünzburg, Sportplatz=3.3. Ich nehme an, du wolltest platform:width=3.3 eintragen und habe das so korrigiert. Vielleicht schaust du nochmal drauf, ob nun alles paßt.  
Servus,  
Rainer
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 09:11:42+00:00): Duplicate https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2332694058
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:36:46+00:00): `name=` is the most common name, not your idea of the world. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
HKHikerhang (2022-03-31 04:22:33+00:00): 鋼線灣 is the commonly used name for this bay. 大口灣 just an alternative name
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:36:11+00:00): `name=` is the most name, not your idea. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
HKHikerhang (2022-03-31 04:18:35+00:00): Please do not change the peak and path to 鷂婆石 and 鷂婆脊 again! Those names are historical names and not commonly used now.
HKHikerhang (2022-03-31 04:22:16+00:00): This peak is not the commonly known 狗肚山
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:35:45+00:00): Please don't move to historic locations. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:35:04+00:00): Please make your own map if you don't like seeing Chung Kwai Chung for some reason. OSM is about existing common use. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
hanchao (2022-03-31 08:21:25+00:00): 不要添加无效的测试数据
测试数据的修改已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119147692
user_5359 (2022-04-04 06:07:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609842602/history (on of thirty six ways). You change name:statcan_rbuid to statcan_rbuid and name:source to source:name (good!). If I understand it correctly, statcan_rbuid is a reference number from Statistics Canada. Wouldn't an understandable name like ref:CA:rbuid make more sense here?
Himké (2022-04-05 22:21:15+00:00): It does make sense, but I haven't seen use of "ref:CA:rbuid" so far. Many other features across the country are currently tagged as "statcan_rbuid". A discussion thread should be opened for this topic!
Ong Kai Jin (2022-04-13 13:08:20+00:00): Wow! Detail-oriented
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:33:55+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7242344049 . Ho Man Tin around Oi Man Estate is the existing common area. There's no problem with it referring to the entire area .

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
user_5359 (2022-03-31 07:36:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You didn't add a hotel, you add a name on building. Did you see the "Best Western Key Ambassador Resort". Are they in the same building?
Ian Liao (2022-05-08 17:57:42+00:00): I saw the "Best Western Key Ambassador Resort", but I think the name belongs to a resort that is Permanently closed (https://www.google.com/maps/place/Best+Western+Key+Ambassador+Resort+Inn/@24.5549402,-81.7495991,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x7f26d7ff36d3c0b6!8m2!3d24.5549402!4d-81.7495991).
giubar (2022-08-20 18:14:29+00:00): The ferris wheel is a temporary attraction. Is it right to map it?
thetornado76 (2022-08-21 19:33:23+00:00): If it was only temporarily erected, then of course it doesn't belong in OSM. At the time, it looked to me as if it was always there. That's why I had entered it.
giubar (2022-08-21 21:04:51+00:00): There is no problem, thanks for the contribution to the map of our areas. Edit it if you like, perhaps marking it as temporary. They always install it in the same place.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 21:10:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9625552641/history has shop = smoke_shop that was added in this edit
Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ?

Or maybe it sells e-cigarettes and is shop=e-cigarette ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3De-cigarette )?

Or maybe shop=tobacco is the best fit ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtobacco )?

Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?
Graptemys (2025-05-15 02:34:45+00:00): It has been a while since I've lived in the area and so I can't go look and for all I know the shop might be gone now.

IIRC they sold all kinds of smoking accessories. That's not my cup of tea so I never went in to learn more. Their website shows mostly vapes now so shop=e-cigarette might work, but I think not all "smoke shops" sell e-cigarettes. shop=headshop might not be wrong either, but again, not every "smoke shop" sold cannabis paraphernalia. 

shop=tobacco and shop=smartshop are definitely not appropriate. I don't think there are very many of those around.

I started using the shop=smoke_shop tag because that's what they call themselves and none of the other tags are close. It seemed like a reasonable time to use ATYL instead of trying to pretend it's another type of shop. I see it's been used a handful of times since then (13 total, 5 of them from me in this neighborhood).
legofahrrad (2022-03-31 16:08:24+00:00): Hallo Proxy72,
deine Änderungen sehen für den Moment ganz gut aus. Ich möchte dich aber darauf hinweisen, dass während der Baustelle lieber nichts geändert werden sollte. Wie du selber schreibst "laufen [die] Umbauarbeiten noch". Die Baustelle ist in voraussichtlich ca. einem Monat abgeschlossen. Daher solltest du noch solange warten.
Bei Baustellen, die mehrere Monate oder Jahre dauern, kann man die Straßen mit 'highway=construction' markieren.
Viele Grüße! ;-)
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 08:32:41+00:00): Please don't add historic features to OSM. Do this in OHM. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
mavl (2022-05-20 15:48:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-07 20:10:01+00:00): please first align imagery before mapping. Accuracy of base map is originally high so it would be much appreciated if you could integrate it into your #adt processes, i don't stop doing those types of comments to your fellow mappers...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119142885
Omotesando (2022-12-09 03:55:24+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, thanks again for reaching out about the alignment here, and for realigning these highways. In the future I will take the current data alignment into consideration when selecting imagery and making edits.
tux67 (2022-03-31 07:20:29+00:00): Hi Muhmaker,

Kirchstraße 10 und 12 in Erkelenz sind separate Gebäude. Auf Basis welcher Daten hast du die zusammengeführt?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119142986
Muhmaker (2022-03-31 11:50:41+00:00): Hallo,
ich benutze die NRW Orthofotos und ALKIS Layer, die von JOSM angeboten werden. Bei der genannten Adresse habe ich tatsächlich nicht genau hingeschaut. Kirchstraße 12 und Aachener Straße 11 sind laut ALKIS allerdings ein Gebäude. Kannst du das zufällig mit Ortskenntnis bestätigen? Nr. 10 würde ich dann abtrennen und die beiden anderen Adressknoten im Eckgebäude belassen falls du nicht andere Informationen hast.
tux67 (2022-03-31 12:02:04+00:00): Ich bin morgen früh wieder in der Ecke und kann mir das ansehen. Die bauliche Trennung kann man m.E. am Dach erkennen. Im ALKIS Layer sieht es sogar so aus, als wäre die Kirchstraße 10 von einem Segment des Gebäudes Aachener Straße 9 umgeben.
tux67 (2022-04-01 07:55:10+00:00): So - ich war da. Hausnummer 10 und 12 sind klar separate Gebäudefronten (10 springt leicht vor)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119142986
Muhmaker (2022-04-01 10:57:39+00:00): Danke für das Nachschauen vor Ort. Ich habe Kirchstraße 10 jetzt als eigenes Gebäude erfasst. Dieses seltsame Segment vom Gebäude Aachener Straße 9 habe ich jedoch ignoriert. Das weicht mir zu sehr vom Luftbild ab. Es gibt manchmal irreführende Flurstückgrenzen die nicht unbedingt etwas mit dem Gebäudeumriss zu tun haben müssen. Es gibt leider immer wieder User, die alle Linien aus dem ALKIS sehr unkritisch in OSM kopieren. Die Adressen sind zumindest hier jetzt korrekt erfasst denke ich.
wireguy (2022-03-31 20:37:11+00:00): Hi V,  can you check the relations Upper Darby and Lansdowne,   I think they have too many Union Ave's in them.
vrynkevich_lyft (2022-04-01 09:41:48+00:00): My name is Veranika, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Many thanks for paying attention to this. I’m so sorry I have missed the extra members addition to the relations Upper Darby and Lansdowne. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience these changes may have caused. I have removed the extra members of the relations in this changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/119189629/. I can promise I and my team will look deeper into the reasons why this has happened to avoid these kinds of mistakes in the future. Thank you so much for your contribution and valuable feedback!
Diacritic (2022-03-31 08:17:29+00:00): Hi MapAnalyser,

What is your reasoning from changing these roads back into motorway_links? They don't appear to meet the criteria for a link roads: they aren't sliproads but are important roads in their own right.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119144105
Diacritic (2022-04-04 03:27:09+00:00): Hello MapAnalyser,

I have not received a response, but I was able to conduct a survey myself earlier.

Terminal Drive and Mercer Drive have "END FREEWAY" signs almost as soon as you leave the Tulla. (I've added these as points). This implies that there is no access restrictions beyond that point, and indeed these roads have driveways and other access points which make them much more like "normal" roads than link roads. Similarly, Melbourne Drive doesn't "join" the freeway for some time, and it used to access the service station.

I have added points for the road signs, and adjusted the street types accordingly.

Dian
mavl (2022-05-20 15:48:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:48:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Monstrofil (2022-03-31 11:30:17+00:00): Are you fucking stupid?
Monstrofil (2022-03-31 11:33:01+00:00): This is a crime according to the current law.
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#n3905
ivanbranco (2022-04-02 09:46:45+00:00): Why did you delete all these housenumbers?
luschi (2022-12-13 20:08:57+00:00): Hallo TV Tramin,     
aufgrund der entfernten Hausnummern und der doppelten Erfassung diverser Brunnen habe ich diese Änderungen komplett rückgängig gemacht.

lg     
luschi
Dodko (2022-04-24 08:34:23+00:00): Telefónne čísla treba pridávať v medzinárodnom tvare +421 xxx xxx xxx aby sa dovolali aj cudzinci a zo zahraničia.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:phone
Pavol33 (2022-04-24 10:00:31+00:00): hej snazim sa, asi som to prehliadol
aceman444 (2023-07-14 12:13:06+00:00): A do nazvu objektu nedavame cele reklamy alebo ako sa oni opisuju, ale fakt len nazov (vlastne meno).
Takze tento TODOS https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69026712/history
som zmenil na
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189552695

Informacie o servise su tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11045775330). Takisto znacky vozidiel sa zapisuju do 'brand', takze nie je potrebne (ani spravne) vsetko v nazve.
Dakujem
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-31 09:15:12+00:00): Šiaip tai lenkiškai „Poplawy“... ;-)
Jay May (2022-03-31 09:18:37+00:00): Hmmmmm... Dabar galvoju. Ar Popławy normaliai ne "Paplaujos"?
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-31 11:20:58+00:00): Taip, tiesioginis vertimas Poplawy->Paplaujos. Bet lietuviškai (oficialiai) rajonas Paupys.
Jay May (2022-03-31 11:59:45+00:00): O.K.! Aš visada galvojau, kad Paplaujos ir Paupys yra 2 skirtingi miesto dalys!
user_5359 (2022-04-04 05:56:31+00:00): Hello! Please connect your waterway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046768100/history) with other waterways
Tanzbärli (2022-04-01 18:13:27+00:00): Danke :)
user_4493657 (2022-09-03 21:24:53+00:00): Cześć Krzychu. Chciałbym ciebie prosić o niesklejanie linii (np. drogi) z obszarami (różne obszary typu landuse, natural itd.) w większości przypadków takie sklejanie utrudnia późniejsza edycję. 

Przykładem może być ten niechlujnie wyrysowany i co gorsza połączony z drogą obszar mający reprezentować obszar zadrzewiony. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046768558
wkdgs (2022-03-31 10:50:45+00:00): Hi,

hast du eine Ahnung was es mit den ganzen Zäunen auf sich hat? Auf den Luftbildern sieht es nicht so aus, als ob da wirklich durchgängige Zäune um die Wohnblocks herum gebaut wurden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119147233