piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bobby444 (2018-05-14 09:33:50+00:00): The bobby444:schema is a private notation for me until I can get things stabilised. It is part of my nascent system for tagging bus services sensibly. When I've decided how it is going to work, I'll submit it as a proposal for people to vote on. I used my own username so as to avoid conflicts with other people's usages.

This 'pattern_saturday' business is part of my schema. I don't use things like interval:saturday as the bus routes where I live are very very erratic and won't fit into a simple 'saturday' system. I need to accommodate 'saturday midday', 'saturdays in summer', 'saturday morning','saturday peak', 'saturday shopping hours','saturday early evening'

My schema is broadly that I identify patterns of service and list them with their frequency and opening_times, as you have seen. The system could also be used to accommodate things like:
pattern_evening:disabled_access=no
for a bus service that has disabled access most of the time, but not on those trips which meet the 'evening' pattern.

'evening', 'saturday' etc are just names and might not even correspond to that day: I could just as easily have called them 'pattern_1' etc. They are qualified by opening hours.

The idea is that a simplistic renderer/router will just use the plain 'interval' and 'opening hours' tags, but any application that wants more fine-grained information could (but does not need to) get it from those tags.

I have been asking about the proper way to do this for about five years, with no response.

In short, I don't want to reduce 'pattern_saturday:interval' etc, because it is too coarse-grained, and assumes that the whole of a service on a saturday is the same, which it certainly isn't on my local routes.
mueschel (2018-05-14 10:20:45+00:00): Alright, work in progress is always good. 
I don't really like the idea to have so much information in the key. This mostly ends in a huge mess of subkeys that no tool can parse easily. 
Did you try to use the syntax used in :conditional tags? That would be the perfect way to tag arbitrary times and their respective intervals.
Bobby444 (2018-05-14 11:06:27+00:00): Yes, it's ugly, and I tried to explain what I was up against on the talk:buses page, but my edits got lost somehow.

A huge mess of subkeys is, as you say, a bad idea.

I'm not familiar with this conditional syntax that you mention. Is it documented anywhere ?

OSM doesn't seem to 'get' buses, as nothing in any of the 'official' guidelines seems to match the practicalities that are normal here in the UK. My particular problems currently are with the interval tag. What constitutes night varies throughout the country/world. What about a difference between morning/evening peaks ? What about where the peak hour service is actually 'less' than normal (because the service is effectively replaced by another one) ? Does peak refer to certain times of day, or does it refer to maximum service frequency ? What happens when the service is only 'approximately' hourly (varying from 45 minutes to 75 minutes).
Bobby444 (2018-05-14 11:08:02+00:00): If you can provide me a link to the :conditional stuff, I'll try and rework my relations to use that, then I won't need to have 'my own' schema.
eggie (2018-05-13 19:20:02+00:00): Graag commentaar bij je edit zodat lokale mappers weten wat je hebt gedaan. Graag reactie..
EugeSanchez (2018-05-13 19:34:07+00:00): Colegio San Patricio
naoliv (2018-06-01 04:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59447712 where the changeset comment is: Reverting deleted objects in Spain
naoliv (2018-06-01 04:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59447712 where the changeset comment is: Reverting deleted objects in Spain
Truchin (2018-05-13 20:12:35+00:00): Justement, il NE faut pas indiquer le nom de la ligne dans le nom de la gare.
Tu ne tiens pas comptes des remarques qui te sont faites !
Magick93 (2018-05-13 19:24:27+00:00): http://www.maproulette.org/map/85/84356? This is the map roulette page associated.
user_5359 (2018-05-14 16:40:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Did you see the existing way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587929396. Your way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587927095 is a duplicate (normaly we don't paint the area, we only drawn a line for the ways).
Hernan (2018-05-14 11:47:48+00:00): Lamentablemente tuve que revertir tus ediciones, ya que te dedicaste a inventar cosas y nombres. Esto es considerado vandalismo y podes ser baneado de la aplicacion en caso de continuar haciendolo. Por favor lee esta guia antes de continuar editando https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:P%C3%A1gina_principal.
Saludos
user_5359 (2018-05-14 04:32:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the standard notation of a parking slot (following the links).
mike140 (2018-11-13 20:31:35+00:00): Цитата из Wiki: "tertiary - Наступні за значенням дороги в дорожній мережі країни. В Україні відповідають обласним дорогам О-######, що з’єднують великі села."
То что дорога не имеет твердого покрытия не значит что она не может быть tertiary
KaelDK (2018-05-14 13:24:17+00:00): Witam, można zapytać o źródło nazwy tej drogi?
Nakaner (2018-10-10 21:40:41+00:00): This changset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63395792.
bxl-forever (2018-10-19 15:18:24+00:00): Hello,
I don’t think that the park near Quai à la Houille/Steenkoolkaai can be used with a bicycle: It seems it is only for pedestrians, just like ordinary elevated sidewalks.  No sign and to "rules of the park" display to allow people to ride a bicycle here.
This is for way 114973996 and some adjacent ways in this changeset (south-east corner of the box)
Did you see anything I might have missed here?
eMerzh (2018-10-19 20:36:59+00:00): Hey, thanks for the feedback.
correct me if i'm wrong but this
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=r1IBxbO7J5iNmx0-23FpGA&focus=photo
pretty much said that the cycle path go through the park. But not sure there is a blue sign or smth.
ToeBee (2018-05-14 04:27:32+00:00): I see you are an old user but only have a few edits. Welcome back to the project!

Some pointers about this edit: If the speed limit is 40 MPH, then it should be tagged as "40 mph" not as 60 (km/h). Also, you set a motor_vehicle=permissive tag on one of the road segments. This is not correct tagging for a public road. "permissive" means it is private but the owner has given permission for the public to use it. In this case, it doesn't need any kind of permission tag since it is tagged as a secondary road which is assumed to be accessible to the public

I have fixed the tagging errors. Happy mapping!
phbrown (2018-05-14 20:03:17+00:00): When I tagged the speed limit, I only found metric options. Hence the 60 km/hr tag.
ToeBee (2018-05-15 03:21:47+00:00): Oh, I see you are still using the Potlatch 2 editor. It is probably set as your preferred one in your account settings or something. I would highly recommend trying the newer iD editor. Click on the arrow next to the "Edit" button to get the editor choices. iD will default units and other things to sensible values depending on the region you are editing in. Also, it doesn't require flash :)
freebeer (2018-05-16 12:19:42+00:00): Hi,
just discovered this myself as i had my doubts that there could *EVER* be anything lacking in Potlatch:
When you go to the restrictions tab and pop up the speed limit icons, this is a scrollable selection that for me defaults to the end of the available pre-selections.
For a lower limit, and to access non-metric speeds, simply scroll upwards and bask in the glory that Potlatch now offers you.
Life is then again good, songbirds explode in joyous choruses, flowers burst into bloom, and your hay-fever kicks in until a killing frost some months from now.
Hope this helps.
yours in solidarity
ToeBee (2018-05-18 20:28:56+00:00): Your faith in Potlatch (2) is truly inspiring :)
phbrown (2018-05-18 22:49:14+00:00): Changed setting to "iD"

What makes you think I'm still using Potlatch?
phb1948 @ gmail
ToeBee (2018-05-31 15:00:02+00:00): Scroll to the top of this changeset details page and look at the changeset tags. There is a "created_by" tag that specifies which editor was used to make the edit.  

You can of course use any editor you wish but Potlatch is no longer being actively developed so it doesn't know about newer tagging presets and such. It was great for its time but personally I think iD is a better option now. Of course I tend to use JOSM or smart phone apps anyway :)
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-24 18:10:18+00:00): Looks like some #pokemon mapping.

Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61000190
bernardo60 (2021-03-28 01:35:28+00:00): When creating a landuse feature, you should use the tool for "area", not a "line".
bernardo60 (2021-03-28 01:47:38+00:00): Please ignore my comment, I just learnt that "Relations of type multipolygon are used to represent complex areas with holes inside or consisting of multiple disjoint areas"
muralito (2018-12-17 03:04:12+00:00): Hola.

¿El nombre "Dr. Guillermo Colesbery Rawson Norte" es lo que aparece en la carteleria de la ciudad?
Lo veo como demasiado largo para que entre, probablemente el nombre que a poner en name sea algo mas corto.
guillemmal (2018-12-17 03:07:34+00:00): En algunos cartes figura y en otros no, el nombre corto podría ser Doctor Guillermo Rawson Norte
guillemmal (2018-12-17 03:08:58+00:00): Puse Doctor, porque lei en la wiki que las abreviaturas no se colocan, se coloca el nombre entero
muralito (2018-12-17 03:37:42+00:00): Si, esta correcto no se abrevian esas cosas.

Pero el nombre que va en "name" es el que tiene la carteleria de la calle, exceptuando esas desabreviaciones, y no agregando el nombre completo o titulos que pudo ostentar el personaje en honor al cual se nombra. Eso en todo caso iria en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology

Obvio que tambien es bueno tener un criterio, a veces en una cuadra el cartel dice "Calle Perez" y en otra "Perez" ahi se trata de unificar. Se puede tomar como que  "Calle" no es parte del nombre, o si en los alrededores las otras calles tienen "Calle x" en el nombre a este tambien se le deja.

Me parece raro que alguien de su direccion como "Dr. Guillermo Colesbery Rawson Norte 1234", mas probablemente sea algo como "Rawson Norte 1234"

Y la cuestión no es por faltar el respeto al personaje, sino por poner el nombre como se ve en la calle, y si se quiere el recuerdo aclarado en name:etymology:wikidata=Q3395787 o name:etymology:wikipedia=es:Guillermo Rawson

Una cosa parecida creo que pasa con Sarmiento, General Paz y Laprida que son los que me saltaron a la vista.
guillemmal (2018-12-17 03:45:26+00:00): Son personajes históricos de la provincia y la gente los conoce así y los carteles están así. En el Caso de Laprida podría acortase como Narciso Laprida y General José María Paz como General Paz, pero la gente local no los conoce así. Sino por el nombre completo. En el caso de mi calle es Ivonne Barud de Quattropani Oeste, también te suena eterno el nombre pero es así y así doy la dirección
guillemmal (2018-12-17 03:49:31+00:00): Y el que viva en avenida Rawson, da su nombre como Avenida Dr. Guillermo C. Rawson Norte o Sur, lei en la wiki que se evitan las abreviaturas, es por ello que puse los nombre completos. Insisto en la cartelería urbana salen completos
guillemmal (2018-12-17 03:50:48+00:00): Sarmiento es el personaje más importante de la provincia y uno de los más importantes del país, la cartelería sale como Domingo Faustino Sarmiento
muralito (2018-12-17 15:01:07+00:00): Estuve buscando en Mapillary, y las carteleria dice en las esquinas:
* "Rivadavia" y "Av. Alem" 
* "Laprida" y "Salta", no se ve claro el "Laprida" pero esta vacio el resto del cartel.
* "Laprida" y Tucumán
* "Laprida" y Jujuy
* "Rawson" y San Luis
* "Sarmiento" y "Gral. Paz"
* "Gral. Acha" y 9 de Julio
* "Las Heras" y 9 de Julio
* "Urquiza" y "V. Nuche"

Mapillary dice que las fotos son de Marzo de 2018. Pueden haber cambiado.

No se si vos haces mencion a esta misma carteleria o a otra, para ver de donde surge la diferencia.
guillemmal (2018-12-18 17:28:03+00:00): Estuve viendo que a la hora de estar buscando una dirección, los buscadores encuentran TODO lo que contenga cualquier elemento del nombre. Por lo tanto no hay problemas en el largo, esa es la política al respecto adoptada en el resto del mundo. Con la nueva cartelería no se escatimó en gastos por el largo, si me pasas un correo electrónico te puedo mandar fotos.
muralito (2018-12-18 18:01:04+00:00): No hace falta que mandes fotos, yo no dudo de tus dichos, pero lo no tenia claro si estabamos refiriendonos a los mismos carteles. Si se cambiaron y los nuevos tienen nombre completo, ya está, es eso lo que va en OSM.

Lo del nombre corto entonces quizás convenga dejarlo entonces en short_name por si alguna aplicación no tiene tanto espacio de pantalla que igual pueda mostrar algo coherente, pero es para otro tema.
Mike Baggaley (2018-05-20 11:13:41+00:00): Hi, in this change you have marked way 4982131 (part of Kirtling Street) as private. However, it appears to have the Thames Path running along it. Can you please review whether pedestrian access should be allowed or whether the Thames Path is marked in the wrong place?

Thanks,
Mike
Russ (2018-05-20 11:20:07+00:00): It appears to be temporarily closed for the Tideway works (that'll be at least for 3-4 years I'd expect). I didn't survey the dogleg of Kirtling Street to the east so I can't confirm whether it still links up to the path/William Henry Walk there, but given the extent of the Tideway works I have a suspicion that link is probably closed too.

Ideally it could do with going back to survey more thoroughly. There's also a bit of thames path on the eastern end of the Riverside development which appears to no longer exist.

I'll add notes for this.
ma-rt-in (2018-05-14 14:17:27+00:00): hallo,
du brauchst bei dem weg effektiv nur das bicyle=yes als zugangsbeschränkung. der rest ist überflüssig!
lakedistrict (2018-05-18 12:20:04+00:00): Hi, are you sure that Skelwith (node 5615914897) is a separate hamlet from Skelwith Bridge village (node 434301526)? As a local, I suggest deleting the Skelwith hamlet node and making Skelwith Bridge the admin_centre, even though it's on the edge of the boundary.
Colin Smale (2018-05-18 13:55:23+00:00): Hi, thanks for your local view. Having searched high and low for evidence of Skelwith as a separate entity, I have not found anything on old maps or similar. However I have seen photos indicating there is a sign in the sharp right bend in the A593, opposite the Skelwith parish notice board....
That is the sum total of my evidence as to the existence of Skelwith, but it is beyond doubt that the main village of Skelwith Bridge is actually in Lakes CP, despite the many claims to the contrary!
My usual test for the "Admin centre" of a parish is the location of the (parish council-run) Village Hall. Any idea where that would be for Skelwith/Bridge?

Would you be able to check if that sign is still present, and suggest whether that is sufficient to conclude that "Skelwith" exists?
lakedistrict (2018-05-18 14:05:14+00:00): It's here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256204861

Perhaps the Skelwith Bridge node can be moved across the river so that it's actually in the parish, maybe at the south end of the bridge?
Colin Smale (2018-05-18 15:20:05+00:00): Sounds like a good compromise to me... I will do it like that. Are you local enough to check for that sign anyway? It has got my curiosity going.
lakedistrict (2018-05-18 15:32:13+00:00): Yes, but I probably won't be going that way for a month or so. Thanks :)
Lokai (2018-05-14 04:13:41+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei OSM,

dein Beitrag ist leider nicht von Erfolg gekrönt, was ist deine Absicht? Erläutere bitte, dann finden wir eine Lösung. 

Schöner Gruß
user_5359 (2018-05-14 04:25:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
mueschel (2018-05-18 10:17:28+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. 
Could you specify if this is a hospital or a pharmacy?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5615996531
The name and the tag are contradictory.

Thanks, Jan
zors1843 (2018-05-14 08:12:50+00:00): Classificatie van Secondary naar living street ?
Zie wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=living_street
naoliv (2018-06-20 14:05:16+00:00): Raphael, tem alguns objetos que estão sendo duplicados.
Por exemplo, já existiam alguns locais representados por um nó (igreja, prefeitura, etc) e você acabou traçando eles como área também (ficando um nó dentro da área, gerando duplicação portanto).
Se já existe um nó no local você pode reaproveitá-lo na área que você for traçar (deixando ele sem nenhuma tag), colocando as informações do local apenas na área.
Dessa forma não geramos duplicação e nem remoção desnecessária de objetos.
raphaelmirc (2018-11-28 15:49:31+00:00): boa tarde Naoliv, já fiz as correções!
naoliv (2018-11-28 15:50:45+00:00): Tá jóia.
Abraço!
Warin61 (2018-10-01 00:03:29+00:00): Hi,
Way: 251900617 - you added the tag 'landuse=grass' yet it has the tag 'natural=wood'.

This means the area is covered by trees. 
This also means the area is covered by grass. 

Yet is cannot be both. 

----------------------------
The Way: 251900617 needs work! Leave it to represent the trees. Possibly it needs to be a multipolygon relation with inners for grass and water. I have removed the grass tag. 
Make one or more new ways for your grass.
Bob the Shibe (2018-05-14 00:50:52+00:00): Wrong comment. I changed a few buildings and fixed some wrong tags of residential road East Seawell street (my fault).
M!dgard (2018-05-15 21:17:18+00:00): Een wegenhiërarchie is een complex gegeven, en u nivelleert in deze en voorgaande changesets alles in de Geelse binnenstad naar straat (highway=residential) en woonerf (highway=living_street). U introduceerde daarbij ook wat inconsistenties, zoals woonerven met maximumsnelheid 30, terwijl woonerven juist een maximumsnelheid van 20 hebben, en zoals secundaire en tertiaire wegen die niet meer aangesloten zijn op een hiërarchisch logische manier. Daardoor hebben we in het Belgische chatkanaal besloten deze classificatie in zijn geheel ongedaan te maken. Als nieuwkomer werkt u zich misschien beter eerst wat in alvorens zulke grootscheepse herclassificaties te ondernemen.

Uw andere bewerkingen zoals speeltuinen en parken zijn zeer welkom!

Als u vragen heeft, kunt u steeds terecht in ons chatkanaal, te bereiken:

* via het Matrixprotocol: #osmbe:matrix.org
 (open in browser: https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org)
* via IRC: ircs://irc.oftc.net/osmbe (open in browser: https://webchat.oftc.net/?channels=osmbe)
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-05-14 11:39:13+00:00): Yes, the park is done quite well. However, do not touch the streets. living_street = woonerf = you need a special sign (the one with the playing kid); see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

Please, if you don't know what you are doing, come around on our chat channel
escada (2018-05-14 11:46:57+00:00): You changed path (which allow cyclist) to footpath (which does not allow cyclist). Is that correct ?
maraf24 (2018-05-17 17:23:45+00:00): Tak na zdrowy rozum - skoro ten park się nazywa Mauzoleum Żołnierzy Radzieckich, to czy w jego skład nie powinien wchodzić też cmentarz?
A jeśli nie, to czy park powinien się tak nazywać?
kocio (2018-05-19 06:59:07+00:00): W jego skład wchodzi cmentarz przecież, jak widać, natomiast prawda terenu jest taka, że to jest założenie parkowe, a nie same kwatery z grobami.
maraf24 (2018-05-19 08:34:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8166150
kocio (2018-05-19 08:39:09+00:00): A, racja, dawno to robiłem, teraz tylko poprawiałem przyległe tereny. Masz rację, należy ten park powiększyć żeby zawierał cmentarz i pewnie wtedy ta nazwa stanie się zbędna.
abakus_uploader (2018-05-14 22:32:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-05-14 02:36:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2018-05-14 18:59:12+00:00): Seria também interessante completar os dados desta escola, principalmente o nome. Bem vinda ao OSM!!!
user_5359 (2018-05-14 16:20:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
Supaplex (2019-02-07 18:18:17+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ardhavara (2018-05-14 05:53:31+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-05-14 06:00:22+00:00): test2
ardhavara (2018-05-14 05:35:56+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-05-14 06:07:30+00:00): test2
ardhavara (2018-05-14 05:54:18+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-05-14 05:36:40+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-05-14 06:06:43+00:00): test2
ardhavara (2018-05-14 05:50:57+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-05-14 06:02:41+00:00): test2