piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2017-10-19 22:35:49+00:00): Hi
The way 533298379 - farmland that you added crosses it self - along Fogarty's Gap Road. Generates an error in OSMinspector of 'shared segment'. In this instance I thing you can safely remove the appropriate nodes from the way without any impact on what you are mapping.
mbethke (2017-10-18 07:40:01+00:00): This name is neither English (name:en) nor Lao?!
d3d9 (2017-12-05 13:52:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1229378
Constable (2018-02-17 16:23:56+00:00): hi there, welcome to osm. Watch out, you added your business ad a place of worship but I'm pretty sure your office is not that a church or something like that. Why don't you choose another tag? maybe this one https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dmoving_company
Constable (2018-02-17 16:24:38+00:00): Also, delete that "Best moving company Boston", that's not part of your company name
thanks
freebeer (2018-02-25 13:32:56+00:00): ciao Constable.
after no response to your hand-written comment (5359 has a one-click macro template for this SEO spam, have not seen it as of late) and with it having dropped off the overview radar,
well...
It almost feels as good as purging OpenPokemonMap Vanderlismus.
#OSMenema
#mapsme
Constable (2018-02-25 17:39:24+00:00): thanks for dealing with that node. I'd have been back on this during the week ahead, I do always double check if my comments get ignored or not.
As always, thanks for your help!
iWowik (2017-11-22 06:43:36+00:00): День добрый, прежде чем править названия улиц ознакомились бы с документацией о правилах наименования улиц, чтобы не вынуждать людей за вами исправлять
Nakaner (2017-10-18 13:03:49+00:00): Please pause your import until open issues are resolved. See my posting on the Imports mailing list for more information. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005188.html
VLD006 (2017-10-25 23:04:36+00:00): Hi Nakaner,
Thank you for your comments and post. We have replied to the import list.
Best,
Joseph
ejont (2019-04-05 08:24:06+00:00): Hi Favas007, you deleted a road here. I've restored it now.
dvdhoven (2017-10-18 06:44:12+00:00): Wil je asjeblieft nu eens uit kijken!!!
Gisteren heb je 5 fietsknooppuntrelaties en 2 LF routes vernield met je bussen en nu al weer 2 fietsknooppuntrelaties.
Controleer eerst alle routerelaties voor je je wijzigingsset upload.
De volgende keer revert ik je wijzigingsset  en ga niet meer repareren.
Dit is te gek voor woorden.
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2017-10-18 06:56:25+00:00): Daarnet heb je ook weer de LF1 en de North Sea Cycleroute aan gort geholpen.
Polyglot (2017-10-18 10:55:20+00:00): Ik kijk er straks naar. Ik ben de busrouterelaties 1 per 1 aan het opladen, vandaar dat de validatie niet op alles wat gewijzigd werd gebeurt. Ik kijk ook eens of er geen betere manier is, zodat ik zelf bij upload zie dat er iets scheelt met de fiets- en wandelroutes. PT_Assistant kan alleszins wel aangeven dat er onderbrekingen in zitten.
dvdhoven (2017-10-18 11:48:29+00:00): Je hoeft nergens meer naar te kijken. Fkp en LF heb ik gerepareerd.
FrankXF (2018-01-01 22:25:29+00:00): Hallo rimgailerobertas, hier sind jetzt 3 Restauants ohne Namen. In dem Gebäude ist  aber nur das Füchschen (Brauerrei+Restaurant). D.h. die Änderung würde ich rückgangig machen.
Minh Nguyen (2018-07-06 21:16:51+00:00): Thanks for making these updates. Apparently some of the ways still had construction and access=no tags on them, causing routers to avoid them. Fixed in changeset 60477725.
Canyonsrcool (2017-10-18 14:58:23+00:00): How did you get this new street name? Thanks.
Canyonsrcool (2017-10-18 14:56:27+00:00): Did this street name change?
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-09 21:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53651417 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 53031115 by NaNowa (deletion of building:part=* without reason. This is part of a larger partial revert of some edits of this user.
Canyonsrcool (2017-10-18 21:42:22+00:00): Let me know if you have a source for the name change, otherwise I will put it back to what it was before, thanks!
Canyonsrcool (2017-10-19 17:42:35+00:00): Did this suburb change its name? I doubt it's called Iran.
zors1843 (2017-10-19 07:34:37+00:00): No (private) parking area anymore ?
PKohl (2017-10-19 10:12:13+00:00): private parking is just the (yellow) area in front of Colruyt. Only for clients and completely locked outside opening hours.
zors1843 (2017-10-19 10:32:19+00:00): updated
Łukasz Dudek (2017-10-18 07:07:52+00:00): Attept to fix issues introduced by changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50765399
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52022349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51937051

it's not full reverse, I tried to keep valid changes from these and revert only invalid parts.
trigpoint (2017-10-19 12:03:22+00:00): Hi, I would expect the name Wilko rather than Wilkinsons these days. Probably tag it as shop=homeware although its one of those difficult ones.
Cheers Phil
Durko_freemap (2017-10-19 10:57:44+00:00): Ahoj,
SK ma predvolbu +421, uviedol si 420, to je CZ

Durko
mapycz (2017-10-19 11:03:10+00:00): omlouvam se, byl to preklep, jiz opraveno
user_5359 (2018-08-27 18:08:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-18 21:47:43+00:00): Co slouzilo jako podklad pro tyto budovy? V zadnych dostupnych podkladech je nevidim. Pokud jenom z mistni znalosti a bylo to kresleno od oka, tak by tam melo byt
source=survey
A adresa se nepridava primo na obrys toho domu, ale jako bod ktery se umistni dovnitr toho polygonu. Viz jak to maji okolni budovy.
eggie (2017-10-18 08:02:02+00:00): dubbele adresgegevens verwijderd... amenity=place_worship_toegevoegd.. + religion en denomination
eggie (2017-10-18 08:21:49+00:00): Evt. kan alle info ook naar de adresnode, maar dan wel amenity=place_of_worship van het gebouw halen.
mattpic (2017-10-22 17:09:55+00:00): Couldn't find anything in imagery for this - what were your thoughts here? Could you clarify source?
danielar_telenav (2017-10-23 13:49:32+00:00): Hi, 
From the opposite direction of the restriction I added there is an OpenStreetCam trip where you can see a straight on for buses and taxis lane.
Also, in OSC and Mapillary Images there is a trip on Cesar Chavez Street where the only right sign (except for buses and taxis) can be seen. I am sorry that I missed to include Mapillary Images in the sources as well.
Regards,
Daniela
majid1359 (2017-10-18 08:05:33+00:00): شهرداری بندرانزلی تکراری است
Sanniu (2017-10-24 08:41:45+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533318177 - is it roundabout?
sivan00 (2017-10-24 08:43:40+00:00): Yes.
majid1359 (2017-10-18 08:16:06+00:00): تغییرات ثبت شده است لطفا اخرین اطلاعات ثبت شده امروز ثبت گردد
majid1359 (2017-10-18 08:20:59+00:00): اخرین تغییرات اعمال شود
GorgorMith (2022-02-28 09:54:31+00:00): Hallo darthvenom17, ich habe durch Zufall gesehen, dass du damals den Lohsepark als Relation hinzugefügt und den Spielplatz, die Rampe und den Fußballplatz als "inner" ausgeschlossen hast. Das scheint mir nicht nötig und eher verkomplizierend.

Wäre es für dich in Ordnung, wenn ich den name=Lohsepark auf den way mit leisure=park schreibe und das Multipolygon lösche?

Siehe auch https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/75343/playgrounds-in-a-park-as-multipolygon
4004 (2017-10-18 21:35:50+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
ququruzka (2020-11-18 20:26:00+00:00): шо случилось ? укр язык кишку жмет ? ватан
opendcc (2017-10-18 16:02:22+00:00): Hallo,

wo ist der tag service_station erläutert? Ich finde keinen Wiki-Eintrag dazu ...
Linie29 (2017-10-18 16:42:48+00:00): Hallo!

Hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Betriebsstellen
globalbus (2018-08-21 20:35:20+00:00): I have a question for you. What is a source of your changes? You just add a curves and harpins to road path, but it's definitely not true!
There is an area of new Jalalabad-Kazarman-Issyk-Kul road. I passed this road on 2016, while road works was going on and they simplified path, but everything was not ready (in example, there is a new bridge in different place). Satellite image is old and wrong right now.
NoxLupus (2018-08-22 04:41:19+00:00): I do not remember. I edited that area over a year ago. The sources were imagery layers of bing and mapbox in JOSM
globalbus (2018-08-22 17:03:02+00:00): I reverted part of your change.
Drawing from aerial imaginery is perfectly ok for new paths (because everything is better than nothing). But for old paths you must be aware that aerial imaginery could be much older than previous change.
majid1359 (2017-10-18 09:11:43+00:00): تغییرات
majid1359 (2017-10-18 09:14:39+00:00): تغییرات
streckenkundler (2017-10-18 09:47:18+00:00): Nachwas hast du denn ausgerichtet? Mittlerweile muß man sehr aufpassen...Für den südbrandenburger Bereich ist Mapbox am ehesten lagegenau... auch wenn Mapbox nicht mehr so aktuell ist.
Bing, Esri und Digitalglobe rangieren in der Lagegenauigkeit deutlich dahinter... Für Sachsen dürfen die amtlichen Luftbilder verwendet werden, soweit ich weis... Dann würde ich immer danach ausrichten...

Sven
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-10-19 06:22:23+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tu trzeba użyć chyba addr:place=
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-10-19 07:00:20+00:00): I numery telefonu/faxu są niepoprawne (za krótkie).
Łukasz | Yanosik (2017-10-19 07:20:46+00:00): Dzięki za uwagi, poprawione.
ff5722 (2017-11-04 21:51:54+00:00): Do you know if the road on the Chinese side is open as well?
TuanIfan (2017-11-04 22:07:46+00:00): Hi ff5722, according to the following photo by Bao Quang Ninh, the highway on the Chinese side was open as well.
http://www.baoquangninh.com.vn/dataimages/201709/original/980258_anh_cau_bac_luan_nhin_tu_tren_cao.jpg
ff5722 (2017-11-04 22:08:53+00:00): Ok thanks, I'll remove the construction tags there too
user_4493657 (2017-10-19 12:50:33+00:00): Witam. Potężny budynek wyrysowałeś. Możesz coś więcej opowiedzieć o tym obiekcie?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533331327
RicoElectrico (2017-10-19 16:48:00+00:00): A ja poproszę o dawanie sensownych opisów zmian, z uprzejmości do innych mapowiczów. Co zostało zmienione i dlaczego. To tylko chwila, a bardzo ułatwia przeglądanie zmian oraz wychwytywanie, czy edytujący zrobił to, co zamierzał.
kreuzschnabel (2017-10-24 07:02:45+00:00): In this edit, you deleted http://osm.org/way/398370250 which damaged two multipolygon relations of heathland areas. I recovered this manually. Please take care not to destroy data entered by others, thanks :)
Glucosamine (2017-10-24 07:29:12+00:00): Apologies for any trouble caused. As I remember, this geometry seemed (seems?) to present as an otherwise untagged way - can you help inform my future editing by advising why you used this approach, rather than tagging features with their identity? A wiki reference might be good if there is anything relevant. Thankyou.
kreuzschnabel (2017-10-24 07:40:46+00:00): The line itself is rightly untagged just because it does not represent anything physical. Outer lines of multipolygon relations do not need tags on their own as the relation itself gets the physical tags. Here, a large relation is split into several smaller ones by arbitrary lines. They could be merged into one, admittedly, but that will result in a very large and un-overseeable relation. 

Second, it wasn’t me who initially mapped this :-)

As far as I know, the iD editor gives the relation memberships of an element at the bottom of the properties panel.
keujfl839237 (2017-11-13 11:26:16+00:00): Hi! You don't have to add `bicycle=yes` tags to residential roads, as those roads are `bicycle=yes` by default (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Switzerland). We only map deviations from those defaults, e.g. if a traffic sign forbids bicycle traffic (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_your_local_legislation.2C_if_not_bound_to_objects_in_reality). Kind regards
majid1359 (2017-10-18 09:44:46+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
eggie (2017-10-19 10:23:52+00:00): Het restaurant ligt nu midden op de weg. dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling. Ik kijk even.
eggie (2017-10-19 10:26:08+00:00): info op adresnode geplaatst
Sanniu (2017-10-23 08:17:06+00:00): Something is wrong here - the new connections that you added should be oneway, construction tags are not set according to wiki - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
The routing engines will have a hard time navigation here.
BZVPNR (2017-10-24 19:46:00+00:00): I did a correction. Is it correct now?
It is a tricky place. Basically, there is a building that could not be demolished yet, so a part of this track separated avenue is a two way street.... (I know the place)
Sanniu (2017-10-25 06:36:50+00:00): Much better, only changed construxtion set of tags: construction=residental/highway construction.
majid1359 (2017-10-18 10:14:17+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
majid1359 (2017-10-18 10:20:23+00:00): پاک شود
kartonage (2017-11-13 05:20:04+00:00): Hi,

Das Gelände sieht mir nicht nach einem Gebäude aus (Gebäude im Gebäude und so). Vielleicht nochmal drüber schauen. Danke.

Schönen Gruß
Polarbear (2017-11-23 13:35:40+00:00): Danke Kiekin für die Eigenreparatur. Hier hatte ich tatsächlich den Campus gemappt und nicht nur das enthaltene Gebäude. 

healthcare=hospice halte ich übrigens für ungeeignet, es ist im Wiki auch sehr schlecht beschrieben. Ein Hospiz ist mehr als eine Sterbestation.
glglgl (2017-10-18 11:45:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!

Kleine Tips:

1. Die meisten Changesets sind Ergänzungen in der Karte. Genauere Beschreibungen der Changesets sind oft sehr willkommen :-)
2. Wenn man viele Änderungen in einem kleineren Gebiet macht, dann ist das Zusammenfassen in einem Changeset oftmals praktischer.
3. JOSM ist, wenn man viel mit OSM macht, ein praktischeres Programm als das browserbasierte iD.
zstadler (2017-10-24 23:01:34+00:00): הי איציק,

תודה שהצטרפת לעורכי המפה של OpenStreetMap
.
בעריכה זאת נראה שהוספת הערה פרטית "גמר מסלול 1/4" לעין ירקעם.
.
על פי כללי הפרוייקט, אין להכניס הערות פרטיות למפה. תמחק בבקשה את ההערה הזו והערות דומות שאולי הוספת במקומות אחרים ותמנע מכך בעתיד.
.
תודה!
itzikora (2017-10-25 19:46:37+00:00): קיבלתי הודעתך ואמנע מכך
zstadler (2017-10-25 20:51:43+00:00): תודה!
eggie (2017-10-18 15:48:32+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-10-18 15:51:16+00:00): Graag commentaar bijvoegen... in dit geval.. "correctie naam."
majid1359 (2017-10-18 11:07:39+00:00): آخرین آپدیت امروز در openstreet  صورت گیرد
parukhin (2017-10-29 18:58:44+00:00): Дмитрий, здравствуйте!
Здорово, что добавляете ТП на карту. Часть я "превратил" из магазинов в подстанции, но вы добавляете новые. Поэтому хочу попросить вас разобраться с iD https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=53036495#map=18/64.53115/40.60238 или JOSM http://www.josm.ru/ с их помощью можно указывать характеристики ТП, рисовать ВЛ, кабели и т.п.
Если нужна помощь - обращайтесь.
Карта http://frexosm.ru/power/#9.15/64.5101/40.5998
canfe (2021-05-17 07:16:46+00:00): Ma la ciclabile che parte da via Cafasse a Fiano vicino alla piazza è davvero una ciclabile ad esclusivo uso delle bici?
manu3287 (2021-05-18 07:50:36+00:00): Il comune di Fiano nella delibera n°34 del 25/10/13 la definisce PISTA CICLABILE. https://www.comune.fiano.to.it/it-it/amministrazione/amministrazione-trasparente/pianificazione-e-governo-del-territorio/2013#17354

Poi se viene utilizzata anche dai pedoni questo non lo so.
eggie (2017-10-19 10:19:23+00:00): Graag invullen wat je edit inhoudt
Chrysopras (2017-12-07 11:45:29+00:00): This changeset, identified as vandalism (please see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=676052#p676052), was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54428824
maxerickson (2017-10-18 13:56:17+00:00): Hi-

The "name" field should be used when something has a specific name. There is a separate building field that is used to note that an object is a building.

I've seen a fair number of people using #msft and adding name=building, if an organizer or some project information steered you into doing this, please consider passing the correction along.

Thanks,

Max
highflyer74 (2017-10-19 06:24:18+00:00): Moin! Kannst Du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5174546687#map=19/53.02090/9.06068 nochmal nachsehen? Da hängt ein building=* am Node. Übrigens: der Editor JOSM warnt Dich vor vielen potentiellen Fehlern, bevor Du hochlädst. Wenn Du den ausprobieren willst, schau Dir mal https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ an. Wenn Du Hilfe dabei benötigst, melde Dich gern. Gruss aus HB!
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-18 21:51:08+00:00): Stale ta linie "severni terasy" ma jenom jmeno, takto ji zadny render nezobrazi. Zrejme to je zed (barrier=wall) nebo hradba (barrier=city_wall).
majkaz (2017-10-18 13:32:13+00:00): Ahoj, 
prosím Tě, můžeš na ty změny ještě jednou kouknout?
Ta kombinace path & lanes na té cestě u Vodní za potokem je absolutně nesmyslná. Buď tam nech service, nebo vymaž z té pěšiny "lanes".

A ta polní cesta (track) na Krokově v prostředku je přece taky nesmysl, to je normální, i když úzká a neudržovaná ulice. Beru, že to tam bylo už předtím, ale nechávat to tam blbě přece nemá smysl.
woy_cb (2017-10-19 06:28:42+00:00): Ahoj,
koukám na to. Lanes z pěšiny jsem vymazal, ale neměnil jsem to na service, protože to to skutečně není.
Tou krokovkou myslíš co? Tohle?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533356590
Nic proti, ale pak by měla být jako ulice uvedená celá Krokovka. Ta je dokonce v RUIAN uvedena:
http://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/ulice/75108
Segment mezi ní a Blahoslavovou je sice v KN vedený jako ostatní plocha-ostatní komunikace, ale v RUIAN není začleněn ani ke Krokově ani Blahoslavově.
Já ji prostě přidal, nevím, proč v mapě nebyla. Nic proti tomu změnit to na ulici, ale svým charakterem mi připomíná spíš polňačku. A žádný adresní místo na ní nemáš.
majkaz (2017-10-19 07:49:02+00:00): Ahoj, díky za to zkouknutí. 

K té Krokově - myslela jsem http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27457508 a tu druhou část na sever. Netuším, zda ses do toho nedostal víceméně nevinně, jen jsi vidět na posledních úpravách.
Ale obecně "polňačka" v městské zástavbě, která jednoznačně nevede do polí, by snad měla být špatně i když to její charakter beze sporu má, nebo ne? Zvlášť v tomhle případě, kdy při pohledu na mapu je na severu ulice Krokova, na jihu ulice Krokova, jen mezi křižovatkami s Přemyslovou a s Dalimilovou je polní / lesní cesta.
woy_cb (2017-10-19 18:24:43+00:00): Ahoj,
tak to jo :-)
Opravdu jsem v tom celkem nevinně, protože jsem jen napojoval tu krátkou spojku do Boleslavovy a upravoval drobně trasu, ale nesahal jsem do atributů (i když teď na to koukám a asi se mi to omylem povedlo...). Nicméně polňačka to byla a na tom jsem nic neměnil.
Uprav to dle svého přesvědčení, nehodlám to vracet zpět :-)
Btw. Ty jsi vrbenská?
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-18 21:53:23+00:00): To dost pravdepodobne neni pesina, ale asi chodnik. Pesina je vyslapana, bez jasnych okraju. Zpravidla v prirodnim porostu nebo na louce.
eggie (2017-10-19 10:13:10+00:00): Oke... Timmerfabriek Snel heb ik nog even gedaan. office=yes toegevoegd, maar dat kan wellicht een betere tag worden.
mueschel (2017-10-21 13:33:28+00:00): Hi,
you added this tag to a node:
Transport/auto = Lavage
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419305176
Is this a place to wash a car? The correct tag is "amenity = car_wash" for this. Could you change this?
Cheers, Jan
Hjart (2017-10-18 13:56:06+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag. Jeg vil dog lige rulle denne ændring tilbage, idet det du klassificerer den til her bruges til meget mindre butikker (i stil med 7-Eleven og hvad man kan finde på tankstationer og campingpladser)
majid1359 (2017-10-18 12:51:11+00:00): اخرین تغییرات در نقشهopenstreet  در مسیریاب مجیک ارث اعمال شود
eggie (2017-10-19 09:59:55+00:00): operator is de uitbater van de parking ..
Dus Brandweer .... Denk dus dat dit weg kan... Parkeerplaats Brandweer
Grillo (2017-10-18 16:24:32+00:00): Hi cb75! Please note that changeset comments should describe the edit that was just made. "Strava/Bing fixes", that you use on all changesets, isn't very descriptive. Please try to describe what you edited in the changeset in the future. Please read through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.

/Andreas
majid1359 (2017-10-18 13:01:29+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
DD1GJ (2017-10-19 16:28:17+00:00): Hallo izquierda, wleche "offiziellen Karten" hast du verwendet? Insbesondere beim Bayern-Atlas ist die Entnahme von Informationen aus Urheberrechtsgünden ausdrücklich nicht erlaubt. Um einen wirrklich freien Datenbestand zu haben, erfassen wir bei OSM das, was vor Ort sichtbar sind. bzw. verwenden nur ausdrücklich zugelassene Quellen.
izquierda (2017-10-20 06:27:25+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ, ich habe meine über GPS-Daten aufgezeichneten Straßenpunkte punktuell mit dem vorhandenen OSM Daten abgeglichen. Zudem wohne ich an einer der neu eingetragenen Straßen und bin daher um Aktualisierung bzw. Auffindbarkeit derselben in freiem Kartenmaterial bemüht.
DD1GJ (2017-10-20 06:37:53+00:00): Prima, dann ist es eigenes lokales Wissen. Hinweise auf offizielle Karten führen zu Missverständnissen und Verwirrung. Bei Der Verwendung von JOSM hättest du offiziellen Zugriff auf das Luftbild der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung, welches im Gegensatz zu Bing sehr lagegenau ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Danke fürs Mitmachen und weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM, Joachim
majid1359 (2017-10-18 13:10:07+00:00): تغییرات در openstreet  و نقشه مجیک ارث اعمال شود
Noen (2017-10-20 16:31:34+00:00): Det var ingenting galt med Grotten og Hemsen i OSM? building:part var riktig tagging her. Dessuten er det riktig å tegne etter foten på bygget, og ikke etter taket, når man skal legge inn bygninger etter flyfoto.

Jeg reverserer deler av dette endringssettet.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-18 14:57:18+00:00): Hello! And welcome to OSM! I'm rorym, one of the active OSMers from Ireland, and I see you requested a review of this change, so here we go!

Overall it's very good. 👍 You've added houses that were missing, and included details that we can't get from aerial imagery, like addresses. Addresses are hard to timeconsuming to collect, but very useful, so it's great that you're adding them to OSM!

There's a few newbie issues, which are kinda understandable. iD has a "make an area rightangular" (I think by pressing S), and that can make your buildings nicer and more accurate. They have right angled corners in the real world, so might as well map them correctly in OSM.

There's a few times (like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533371044#map=19/53.46579/-6.22973 ) where you should "glue" the buildings together. They share a wall, so we show that in OSM by making the areas share 2 points. I'm pretty sure most of those are semi-d's, so there should be 2 buildings there, you can split them down the middle.

Hope that wasn't too detailed! Don't worry too much about the complicated things I've mentioned, you're doing fine as it is. 🙂
mapper999 (2017-10-19 19:18:26+00:00): Hallo FabiKVV,
herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Leider ist durch die Änderungen in diesem Changeset die Straßenbahn in der Kaiserstraße verschwunden. Ich habe das soeben repariert.
Könntest du vielleicht erklären, was du mit den Änderungen erreichen wolltest, dann helfen wir gerne!
Weitere Hilfe findest du auch im Wiki ( wiki.openstreetmap.org ), im Forum ( forum.openstreetmap.org ) oder im Hilfeforum help.openstreetmap.org
Viel Spaß beim Einlesen und weitermappen!
mapper999
Fabian Karlsruhe (2017-10-20 05:55:34+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Aufnahme, ich wollte einfach nur die Kaiserstraße für den Linienbusverkehr freigeben, da dies aktuell nicht möglich ist. Könnt ihr mich dann aufklären wie dies funktioniert ?