piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skquinn (2014-12-19 15:55:22+00:00): The data we had was from the 2005 release of the Census Bureau's TIGER data. The quality of that data, in many cases, left a bit to be desired even when it was fresh (I've lost count of the number of times I've said "TIGER hairball" or "TIGER barf" referring to flat out non-existent or very badly misaligned roads).

Anyway, not too bad for a first edit. Only one minor issue: you left CR 407 unconnected to CR 402, which I fixed; I also started realigning a couple of the roads to the aerial photos.
Rudolf Mayer (2015-03-03 18:00:09+00:00): This changeset seems to have deleted much more than initially intended by the author, some changes might needed to be rolled back
martb72 (2015-03-03 21:18:50+00:00): The addresses in this area are considerably out. Most of the addresses in the area of the golf course reference a small village North of the area and not the city of Livingston to the the Southwest as they should. Maybe a rollback would be a good idea to counter these issues.
lyctkel (2022-06-28 15:22:35+00:00): Hi sladen,
the building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317942468 was tagged as building=temporary 7 years ago. On satellite images it's still visible and I think maybe it could be changed to building=yes or something more specific.
Regards,
lyctkel
sladen (2022-06-29 09:27:33+00:00): It was a temporary building when it was built (30 years ago?).
It's made of 5 oversized portacabins, the pairs left+right each form a square classroom, and the fifth one in middle is an entrance hall, and office/storage.
lyctkel (2022-06-29 10:43:51+00:00): Hi sladen,
thanks for the details. It's hard to say what kind of tag is correct.
building=temporary (10 times) is less used than building=portacabin (14 times). building=static_caravan and building=bungalow are close, but aren't correct from my point of view.
I do suggest to leave it as it is and add a note at the tag linking to this discussion. Maybe someone else has a better solution for the tag.
Thanks again and regards,
lyctkel
SK53 (2022-06-30 15:54:26+00:00): Hi lyctkel,

Bungalow is nothing close: a bungalow in UK parlance is typically a single storey detached or semi-detached house, with a variant with rooms in the roof space known as chalet bungalows. They are not any form of temporary accommodation. However not all levels=1 buildings are bungalows. Some towns in the UK are predominantly bungalows (e.g., Southend-on-Sea) and in rural Scotland & Ireland many/most buildings will be bungalows.

Wikipedia has an entry for portable classroom (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_classroom), which may be provide the basis for a more explicit tag. The other phrase used a lot is "modular building".

Note that these are quite common on UK school sites, as were formerly various prefabricated buildings (most early post-WWII and now mainly gone). I have, however, mapped one which is still in use as a chapel in the grounds of Nottingham City Hospital (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208973414).

There are quite good resources on post-WWII pre-fabricated houses (and I've tagged a few types around Nottingham), but it's hard to find anything about equivalent prefabs for institutions (schools, universities & hospitals), and later ones such as these. I spent 2.5 years at school in such buildings & had lessons in others right through my school life. University had another couple of groups & I consulted with one hospital which had lots (even in the early '90s). Nowadays post-WW2 prefabs (residential & industrial) are largely heritage objects (https://www.prefabmuseum.uk/) and some are listed buildings, so definitely worth having suitable tags.

Jerry
lyctkel (2022-07-07 09:55:45+00:00): Hi sladen  and SK53,
I added a link to this discussion to the building. 
Thanks,
lyctkel
serjserjserjserj (2014-12-19 17:27:53+00:00): тропинки
GerdP (2015-10-09 03:55:26+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
node 307195771
hat diverse seltsame tags bekommen,
z.B. highway=secondary
whobert (2015-10-09 12:37:56+00:00): Habs korrigiert; ist eine Editor-Krankheit (Vespucci)
GerdP (2015-10-09 13:30:19+00:00): schon klar, ich wusste nur nicht,
ob irgendwelche Tags beabsichtigt waren.
Danke!
evgenykatyshev (2014-12-19 16:50:05+00:00): Наврное, всё-таки, Нагулино
serjserjserjserj (2014-12-19 17:30:38+00:00): гаражи
serjserjserjserj (2014-12-19 17:28:47+00:00): дорожки и тропинки
GerdP (2015-10-21 18:43:31+00:00): please review:
what is a highway=traffic_signals ?
Adrien G (2015-10-21 19:59:00+00:00): Sorry, it's a mistake. It's only a footway, there is not traffic signals at all.
GerdP (2015-10-21 20:05:41+00:00): okay, thanks
serjserjserjserj (2014-12-19 17:29:31+00:00): размер труб и тропинки
muecforever (2014-12-19 17:16:23+00:00): Accesso bloccato causa cedimento del ponte
dforsi (2014-12-19 18:13:51+00:00): Scusa, ma questo parco è in Italia e ha un nome in inglese?
Tieni anche presente che il campo "note" è pensato per avvertire i mappatori di qualche situazione particolare, mentre quello che hai scritto è più adatto per "description".

Se ritieni che la cosa abbia bisogno di etichette in più lingue perché è nota con nomi diversi (è il caso delle città più famose) puoi aggiungere un suffisso separato da due punti, ad esempio
name:it=Parco di Villa Condulmer
name:en=Park of Villa Condulmer

in quel caso scegli tu cosa mettere nel campo name principale (io metterei quello che c'è scritto all'entrata se c'è un cartello, così uno straniero che non sa né l'inglese né l'italiano almeno può confrontare le scritte lettera per lettera per capire di essere al posto giusto), nel wiki c'è una pagina con altre varianti del campo "name" che ti può essere utile.
raito (2014-12-19 17:54:58+00:00): That 'new' imagery was apparently from April 2013, according to Bing Ariel Imagery Analyzer
SomeoneElse (2014-12-22 11:16:34+00:00): Is the "name" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272170345/history really the name of it or just a description of what it is?
ToeBee (2014-12-19 19:59:48+00:00): Thank you for this addition. It is very well mapped, complete with address. One question: shouldn't this be "Holiday Inn Express"?
davidrbr (2014-12-19 20:14:14+00:00): O yes thank you for letting me know that mistake.
lubosb (2014-12-24 15:12:36+00:00): (versión española en el comentario abajo)

Hi cc3p0,

I have noticed in this your changeset you have used some data from Google. At least, there is source=Google for both hotels you added to Openstreetmap.

I don't know what type of data you have used from Google, but Openstreetmap project is NOT allowed to copy any data from Google or from other sources without explicit permission (license).

Please, remove any data that you have from Google or any other copyrighted source. This also apply to any data you added in past with source=Google.
If you do not, I will remove/revert all hotel data in two days.

If you have any questions, I'll try to answer them.

Thanks
lubosb (2014-12-24 15:13:55+00:00): Google translate:

Hola cc3p0,

He notado en esta su conjunto de cambios que han utilizado algunos datos de Google. Por lo menos, no es source=Google para ambos hoteles usted aumentó a OpenStreetMap.

No sé qué tipo de datos que has usado de Google, pero el proyecto OpenStreetMap no se le permite copiar los datos de Google o de otras fuentes, sin la autorización explícita (licencia).

Por favor, retire cualquier dato que se tiene de Google o cualquier otra fuente de derechos de autor. Esto también se aplica a todos los datos que agregó en el pasado con source=Google.
Si no lo hace, voy a quitar / volver todos los datos del hotel en dos días.

Si tiene alguna pregunta, voy a tratar de responder a ellos.

Gracias
lubosb (2014-12-26 17:54:20+00:00): fixed in changeset 27714096
cm8 (2014-12-19 19:56:44+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland

wird laut wiki für Beruhigungen im Straßenverlauf eingesetzt, nicht am -ende. Für Wendeschleifen gibt es http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop

Eine Verkehrsberuhigung findet an dieser Stelle ja nicht durch die Wendeschleife statt, sondern durch die Poller, die das Wohngebiet vom "Buschland" abtrennen.  Gruß
robert (2014-12-21 12:42:19+00:00): I think you managed to accidentally remove the name "Quincewood Gardens" from here http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=612204
cadsauxk (2015-01-06 21:54:34+00:00): Você está mapeando ruas residenciais de terra como track? Track deve ser reservado somente a trilhas ou caminhos com função agrícola. Prefira usar highway=residential e surface=ground
oddityoverseer (2015-06-03 15:56:56+00:00): I believe these should be designated as highway=cycleway. In the US, highway=cycleway is the same access as [bicycle=designated, foot=yes]. highway=path infers that moped and horse are allowed. Not sure if that's true. 

For reference, see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_States_of_America
Jrachi (2021-05-05 08:56:21+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito un nodo per la cappella di Santa Cristina che era già correttamente taggata come edificio.
È roba vecchia, del 2014, ma magari puoi controllare e mettere a posto.
Ivo, Jrachi
iWowik (2014-12-22 07:47:59+00:00): А откуда у вас взялась такая трассировка?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313735890
vadim-CoP (2014-12-22 20:50:12+00:00): Незнаю, это не я первый её составил. Я лишь подровнял линии, так как посчитал нужным. Вообще проект этой части трассы М-11 скорее всего находиться на проработки, но то что уже нарисовано, думаю воплотиться без значительных изменений.
skquinn (2014-12-23 20:42:33+00:00): Great first edit! Welcome to the OpenStreetMap community!
eggie (2017-03-12 07:27:01+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

In 2 jaar pas  je 5de mappingday. Daarom toch nog een welkomstmail.
Wij volgen startende mappers de eerste tijd... vandaar...
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
zool (2014-12-30 15:17:49+00:00): In this changeset, you appear to have deleted a short section of the A92 trunk road. Was this an accident, or have you verified that the road has really disappeared with a physical survey? If so, then how are the cars still able to get on and off the B912?

In the likely event that this edit to OSM was an accident, I plan to go ahead and revert this change and some related ones on behalf of the project's Data Working Group, the data dispute resolution service for mappers. 

I see these changes were made with the web client, iD. If you are getting more seriously into OSM you will probably want to try out the JOSM client, which is aimed more at the "power user": http://josm.openstreetmap.de/
Chris Fleming (2014-12-31 00:21:02+00:00): Agree that this looks slightly odd, I drove past here a couple of nights ago and didn't notice that the A92 was closed from here. I've also checked the Traffic Scotland website and that hasn't given any indication that the road is closed. So it would be great to confirm the source of this change as quickly as possible.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-05 18:05:53+00:00): Given the absence of a reply here yet, I've undeleted the missing bits of the A92 and joined the roads (and bus routes) up.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27938477 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27938325 .
Phatricia (2014-12-19 22:38:37+00:00): Point of Interest
Prince Kassad (2014-12-20 00:06:20+00:00): auch hier wieder mapillary
ElliottPlack (2016-06-29 19:59:29+00:00): Hi, do you have any documentation for changing all of the county road refs to the (###) format?
marczoutendijk (2016-12-19 21:35:05+00:00): Dag Jaap, 
Zou je hier je commentaar willen geven?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56655
Ik stuurde je ook al een PM, maar daar reageerde je niet op.
lonvia (2015-02-07 20:13:12+00:00): Vielen Dank für das fleissige Eintragen der Hausnummern. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass hier am Ramsberg jeder Knoten ein addr:postcode Tag enthält (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3244008764) Kann es sein, dass es da einen kleinen Copy&Paste-Unfall gab beim Eintragen?
Bernd_BDP (2015-02-26 13:36:14+00:00): Klein ist gut... ;-)
lonvia (2015-02-26 20:21:46+00:00): Da eyewitness nicht weiter reagiert hat, werde ich das wohl mal morgen in Ordnung bringen.
eyewitness (2015-02-28 07:55:36+00:00): Sorry Ionovia -
Ich hatte deinen Hinweis vollkommen vergessen. Ist jetzt gefixt. 

Und ja Bernd - es ist ein kleiner C&P Fehler, da ich ja mit JOSM und dort mit Filter arbeite ist so etwas schnell passiert.  Einmal vergessen die Nodes beim Setzen von Postcode etc. wegzufiltern, schon hängt das auch da dran. Aber dafür ist es genauso schnell wieder weg. War jetzt 'ne Arbeit von einer Minute. :-)
lonvia (2015-02-28 08:12:43+00:00): Super. Vielen Dank, eyewitness. Ich hatte es auch schon wieder vergessen. :)
WanMil (2014-12-28 16:07:40+00:00): Sterndamm (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72230301) was errorneously changed to oneway
anbr (2014-12-28 16:16:10+00:00): Am 25.12.2014 war die Baustelle noch Einbahnstrasse, deshalb bezweifele die Korrektheit deiner Änderung
WanMil (2014-12-29 11:11:53+00:00): Kein Problem. Ändere das ruhig wieder, dann aber bitte mit entsprechendem Kommentar.
anbr (2014-12-29 11:38:29+00:00): Wie gönnerhaft und großzügig von Dir ! Ich bin total begeistert von deinem Kommentar.
sykocus (2014-12-20 10:21:42+00:00): Connected 11th St on Hickam AFB with South Ave on Pear Harbor
BushmanK (2014-12-21 07:09:42+00:00): И с каких пор вот это https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318062982 стало "травой"? Это ветровал, который зарастает деревьями. Займитесь, пожалуйста, чтением документации по обозначению здесь wiki.openstreetmap.org
jumbanho (2014-12-21 16:25:41+00:00): Welcome OSM!  I see that you just added what appears to be a street number for a house in the name tag for that house.  Name is usually used for official names of things, not addresses.  There is a formal way for adding addresses that make it easier to be searched for.  A house just around the corner from the one you tagged would be a good guide as how to tag addresses: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47828347

Thanks for helping out with the map and feel free to ask questions if you have them!
stevea (2014-12-21 21:44:55+00:00): I have "knowledge" of these segments of freeway, also.  They are not highway=trunk, they are highway=motorway (fully controlled-access "freeway" in California).  They are even all named "Freeway."  Please consider changing back to highway=motorway.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-21 13:10:36+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2075957897 seems to have a duplicate "seamark:name" and "name".  Is there any reason for this?  Are there any situations in which a "seamark:name" for something would actually be different to the "name" (as, for example, a bridge might have a different name to the road that runs across it)?
malcolmh (2014-12-21 15:19:08+00:00): The value of the tag “seamark:name” is the name of the object as known to sailors (i.e. as it appears on other nautical charts) This is often different to the local vernacular name, which will be the value of the “name” tag. Having the two types of name tag guards against edit conflicts between sailors and landlubbers!
trigpoint (2014-12-20 18:27:48+00:00): This should have a tag amenity=bank adding, also if the is an ATM this should be added as a node to the outside wall if appropriate.
Good work
Nakaner (2015-07-31 19:29:29+00:00): Ich glaube, du hast da das Lf 4 der Bundesbahn mit dem der Reichsbahn verwechselt. Beim Reichsbahn-Lf 4 wird nicht durch 10 geteilt. Beide stehen nur in ihren angestammten Gebieten.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2371449556/history
*Martin* (2014-12-21 16:15:39+00:00): Ahoj

Len pre istotu, treba rozoznavat tower a mast (http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast).
miguel111 (2014-12-21 21:12:26+00:00): Vďaka za info. Jeden zo stožiarov musím opraviť na "mast".
simone (2014-12-20 18:09:32+00:00): Fantastico!
Skippern (2014-12-21 02:50:06+00:00): name:en should not be necessary when it is equal to name
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-19 15:48:08+00:00): for minigolf, please use leisure=miniature_golf, not leisure=golf_course
Gaiverjoke (2014-12-20 19:18:40+00:00): Add new buildings
trigpoint (2014-12-20 20:43:45+00:00): Has the building been demolished? Seems unlikely as part of a larger building.
If the Turkish Baths have closed then the relevant tags should be removed, but the building left in place.
lxbarth (2014-12-20 21:48:47+00:00): Hey there - would love to hear what you're thinking about border on river. Posted my thoughts here:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-latam/2014-December/000145.html

This is how I mapped a patch yesterday:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-10.94392/-69.25822

Cheers!
GerdP (2015-11-30 21:45:17+00:00): Hi there!
I found this bridge with maxspeed=1 .
I guess it is a typo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318127118
Boggedy (2015-12-01 10:26:10+00:00): Quite right. You can flag up any maxspeed in Ireland not ending in 0 in fact. Fixed Gerd.
GerdP (2015-12-01 11:13:35+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.
I consider all values below 5 as 
typos or mistakes or an unusual method to avoid that routers use  the way, but maxspeed is also
used on railways, so one has to be careful.
cadsauxk (2014-12-23 23:45:58+00:00): Esta situação de oneway aqui parece meio impossível, o trecho inverte a mão logo depois da praça de pedágio. Está certo isto?
leodobrasil (2014-12-24 10:33:04+00:00): Gerald, tudo bem? Encontrei a situação assim: só tinha no mapa oneway permitido de norte para sul (passei lá no campo anteontem, fluxo permitido nas duas direções...lógico). O mapeador anterior deve ter vacilado. Mas, como a BR116 neste lugar também faz parte da relação BR116, apenas mudei o prefixo do oneway para -1, como sugerido pelo Josm, para não quebrar a relação.
cadsauxk (2014-12-24 14:08:07+00:00): Aqui tudo ótimo :) é que na sua edição num dos trechos muda de direção de mão o que tornaria o roteamento impossível. Você não deve ter percebido ;)

Já corrigi
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27672439
tomweg (2016-08-22 16:56:23+00:00): Hi, nodes 3237087153 and 3245127491 have the exact same coordinates. Do all streets share the same junction?
GerdP (2015-11-09 07:26:54+00:00): please review:
I just noted that the way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72232789
is now without tags and is no longer member of any relation. I am not sure if the way is obsolete now or if the relation was corrupted.
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:19:49+00:00): please review way 318139461:
what is meant with highway=project?
This is rarely used.
The same tag is one way 356856966.
Maybe highway=proposed ?
Bernard59118 (2015-10-30 19:00:02+00:00): ok it's proposed
GerdP (2015-10-30 19:10:06+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback. Do you change it? If yes, please add also
proposed=* to specify the proposed kind of way (if you know that)
GerdP (2015-10-31 07:18:33+00:00): way 318139461 is still project.
It seems that there is already a path, 
so maybe no need to call it proposed?
skquinn (2014-12-20 23:06:03+00:00): Good first edit. However, in the future you should use changeset comments to describe exactly what your edit does. Even a short comment like "Add roads" helps.
Vincent de Phily (2015-06-18 11:16:16+00:00): 1:25K GSGS 3906 gives "Fallavallgh" instead of "Fallavagh" as the alt_name for lough Ahusey. Was the name misread from GSGS, or is it yet another alternative name ?
skquinn (2014-12-20 23:33:33+00:00): Great first edit!
DannyAiquipa (2016-07-26 16:55:40+00:00): 
Hey there. I notice that your edit has a weird shape https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318153675/history , can you fix it based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse. Thanks for contributing to OSM.
rickmastfan67 (2014-12-21 07:36:24+00:00): When you mean 'closed', is it closed to all forms of traffic?  If so, that should be tagged as 'access=no' instead of 'motor_vehicle=no'.
Uniplex (2014-12-21 21:42:50+00:00): You are correct, I changed this accordingly
Sai Rama Tours & Travels Jhansi (2014-12-21 08:08:26+00:00): We are one of the most popular travels and tourism corporation services in India with a fleet of magnificent Transport that can suit all purposes and pockets. We specialize in tourism services and also conduct associated services like Tour Packages, Hotel Bookings, Ticket Services and the likes. We have an experienced manpower and a fleet of well maintained Transport to go about our travel activities.
We provides highly experienced and professional chauffeurs who are mostly multilingual in order to assist the cosmopolitan range of clients. Our range of services include the suitable traveling vehicle as well as INOVA , INDIGO , ETIOS , TEMPO TRAVELER , ZYLO  Volvo, Mercedes Coaches, Large Coach, Mini Coach & Tempo Traveler.
: Mobile :+91-9685528998: Phone No. :(07680) -252090
Address :Near Canera Bank, Main Chowk , Orchha Distt.
Tikamgarh - (MP) Pin - 472246
: Email : info@sairamatours.com , khare905@gmail.com
: Website :http://www.sairamatours.com
tyr_asd (2015-02-12 09:43:16+00:00): Hi, du hast hier bei einigen Gebäuden in Wagersfeld als addr:street "Hauptstraße" angegeben (z.B. hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318184455), obwohl die Straße in OSM "Wagersfeldstraße" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29724265) heißt. Was stimmt denn wirklich?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-21 12:21:06+00:00): Hi - just spotted that you've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76227947/history .  Does it really no longer exist (has the quarry or whatever it's serving closed)?

If you're local it would be really useful to help define where https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208856316 goes - it probably isn't as currently mapped through some buildings.

Cheers,
Andy
kartler175 (2015-02-07 09:49:35+00:00): Bleib doch bitte bei den Tatsachen und lege Wiesen und Äcker nur dort an, wo auch welche sind, nämlich neben und nicht auf den Straßen. Dann passiert es auch niicht, dass plötzlich Straßen miteinander verbunden werden, die in Wirklichkeit keine Verbindung haben. Hier kannst Du mal sehen, was das für Auswirkungen auf Router und Navigation hat: http://osrm.at/aTX
OF0 (2017-05-20 14:48:55+00:00): @Kartler175 Das passt schon: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
geow (2017-05-20 15:40:47+00:00): @OF0  Im Gegensatz zum vereinfachten OSM-Datenmodell haben highway und waterway in Wirklichkeit eine flächenhafte Ausdehnung. Es ist daher in OSM topologisch falsch Flächen (z.B. landuse, natural) mit Linien (z.B. highway, waterway) zu verheiraten.
OF0 (2017-05-20 17:33:24+00:00): @Geow Ja, sie haben eine flächenhafte Ausdehnung, wobei eine Dimenson durch das akzeptierte Width-Attribut angegeben werden kann. Dass das (zumindest im Standardstil) nicht entsprechend gerendert wird, mag ärgerlich sein. Und für Waterways gibts es das ebenfalls akzeptierte Riverbank-Tag.
lanzelot72 (2017-05-20 17:57:16+00:00): Hm ... mal langsam.
Wenn wir das alles in letzter Konsequenz umsetzen wollten, dann müssten wir also jeden Wald, jedes Feld, jede Wiese etc. in mehrere Flächen aufteilen und am Rand der jeweiligen Wege micromappen, nur weil da eben ein Fußweg, ein Forstweg, etc. darüber oder hindurch führt. Richtig ?
geow (2017-05-21 21:29:27+00:00): @lanzelot72

Das kann man machen, speziell künftig wenn flächendeckend DOP20 Bilder vorliegen. Momentan ist es wohl verbreitet, dass Feld- und Waldwegen noch über die landuse gezeichnet werden.

Es geht aber primär um was anders:
Das Verkleben von Landflächen mit Straßen ist nicht nur topologisch falsch, sondern hat einen erheblichen Mehraufwand bei späteren Anpassungen der Geometrien zur Folge,

Es besteht daher im deutschen Forum ein breiter Konsens, dass Landflächen in der Regel nicht mit linearen Objekten (auch Fließgewässern, Bahnlinien usw.) verklebt werden.

Es spielt dabei keine Rolle, dass in der Hauptkarte (osm-carto) verklebte Straßen beim Rendern derzeit nicht negativ in Erscheinung treten.

Mehr dazu hier mehr dazu hier  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=624985#p624985