piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-09-17 07:42:47+00:00): Gebouwen kun je wel opdelen door op het gebouw aparte vlakken te leggen getagd als building:part=yes  of house e.d.
Daar kun je dan weer het aantal verdiepingen op bijtaggen. 
Een building:part rendert dan niet en laat de BAG impot intact.
... maar de arts zal op de adresnode 'moeten'.
eggie (2021-09-17 07:43:22+00:00): Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111323178
eggie (2021-09-17 07:45:30+00:00): Dus
amenity=doctors
website=https://huisartsbeltrum.praktijkinfo.nl/
name=Huisartsenpraktijk Beltrum
healthcare=doctor
phone=+31.....
eggie (2021-09-17 07:46:52+00:00): Voor openingstijden kun je deze tool gebruiken
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Hedaja (2021-09-17 22:32:12+00:00): Hi
 I just took a look at your change. Looks quite good. There is one point that's a little off but overall a big improvement.
The whole area still needs some work so I hope to see you keep on imporving the map

Thanks Christian
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111323576
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
GerdP (2022-08-20 08:04:51+00:00): Moin!
Ich stolpere gerade über diese Neubauten, weil Bing /Mapbox teils andere Umrisse zeigen. Zum Beispiel ist diese Hausecke https://www.osm.org/node/9100029593 bei Bing nicht zu finden. Beim Zeichnen von Häusern lieber mehrere Hintergrundbilder anschauen. Einige Umrisse sind noch gar nicht zu sehen, z.B. https://www.osm.org/way/850446815. Hast Du die von Fotos?
eggie (2021-09-17 08:04:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Goe om een review aan te vragen.
Alle begin is moeilijk, maar dit is niet correct. OSM zit vol met afspraken hoe te taggen.
Een wegversmalling wordt bv weer aangeven door een choker.. Zie wiki.
Er staat al een barrier= block verbonden met de straat en de weg zal dus al niet routeren voor motorvoertuigen.
motor_vehicle op de rijbaan taggen is hier fout... of staat er een bord vooraan de straat.
Hoe komt verkeer nu bij de nummers 31 -25?
Het routeert niet meer. 


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111323821

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-17 08:06:11+00:00): Zie hier de outering. Die ging juist prima
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.42397%2C5.28511%3B51.42316%2C5.28817#map=18/51.42311/5.28670

Ik draai even je actie terug. 
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 08:07:14+00:00): reverted by changeset #111324777
eggie (2021-09-17 08:12:00+00:00): De blokkade het ik op de juiste plaats gelegd. Op de Flinkerd mag je denk ik gewoon rijden tot aan de blokkade. 
Even CTRL F5 een paar keer dan zie je het effect.
gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
lasagna (2021-09-27 03:51:40+00:00): I was surprised to see that you have again added the "CA 52" ref to the La Jolla Parkway and some of Torrey Pines Road.
The California Streets and Highways Code defines route 52 as ending at Interstate 5 ( https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC&sectionNum=352. ). From my visits to the area, I have not seen any signs that label this section as part of state route 52.
Are there some new signs that I haven't seen, or do you have another source for this change?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
lasagna (2021-09-27 02:04:17+00:00): I see that you have changed the name of Torrey Pines Scenic Drive. I surveyed this location today and found that the street signs still say "Torrey Pines Scenic Drive."
Do you have a source for this name change, or some evidence that the street signs are wrong?
Hedaja (2021-09-17 22:28:25+00:00): Hi
it seems like you accidentally used highway=unclassfied instead of highway=service for the parking aisle.

Christian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111324276
ashybko_lyft (2021-09-18 13:04:24+00:00): Hi, Christian

My name is Anna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. I’ve made mistaken edits and accidentally put the wrong highway tag value, but soon I found the issue and fixed it in the next changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111324312. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience my edits have caused.

Regards,
Anna
SekeRob (2021-09-17 07:54:21+00:00): Named Contrada Pennicoli per corner sign.
spiregrain (2021-09-17 12:06:37+00:00): Hi eastender.   I just wanted to pick your brain on the allocation of addr:streets to buildings that face onto multiple streets and contain addresses with multiple streets - like w964080374.  You've made it part of Stratford Road in this changeset.  But it also has addresses on Maud Road.   Do you have a reason to add addr:street to the building, and what's your criteria for choosing which street?   (Interested because I've been adding a lot of surveyed address data in this area, and I could try to apply your criteria as I go)  - regards, Ken
eastender (2021-09-17 15:20:41+00:00): Hi Ken, Recently I've been working to try to clear the street name warnings in the E postal area report (see https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/street-warnings/E.html). That building was highlighted in the report as an address with a single postcode (E13 0JN) but with a missing street name. I added the addr:street tag based on the postcode. I didn't spot that the building had addresses associated with its entrances, because those addresses don't include postcodes, and so don't appear on the report. If a building has multiple postcodes then it is legitimate to include all of those postcodes. In this case, the addr:postcode should become "E13 0JN;E13 0JU". But that would create the dilemma that you describe, because the building would then have postcodes with different street addresses (Stratford Road and Maud Road). There are some buildings in the E postal area mapped with multiple postcodes (see https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-errors.html) but, as far as I know, none of them have postcodes covering different streets. In the case of this building, and any others like it, I think probably the best thing to do is to remove addr:postcode and addr:street from the building and add the addr:postcode (and addr:city) tag to each entrance. Regards Mike
spiregrain (2021-09-17 15:40:34+00:00): Right, so it's the presence of a postcode on tbe building that drives the exceptions on mathmos.   Understood, and I agree with your suggestion.

When I'm adding doors-with-addresses, I'll remove postcodes from the building if it's across multiple streets.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
syntex (2021-10-24 21:37:51+00:00): Reverted
juminet (2021-09-18 08:16:10+00:00): Bonjour Vibuyse et bienvenue sur OSM!

En ajoutant le café "La Chinoiserie", vous avez supprimé les tags indiquant que cet objet est un bâtiment (building=house) avec une adresse (addr:street=Rue Pol Jaspart & addr:housenumber=1). 

Je vous laisse les remettre? 

Notez également que ce qui est plutôt conseillé dans ce cas est d'ajouter un point (un nœud) avec les détails du café/restaurant à l'intérieur du batiment, et de ne pas toucher au batiment. En effet, un même batiment peut avoir plusieurs affectations, voire plusieurs commerces (un commerce au RDC, un cabinet à l'étage, etc.).

Bonne continuation sur OSM!

juminet
Vibuyse (2021-09-18 08:41:24+00:00): Bonjour Juminet,

Merci pour cette remarque, c’était mon premier ajout, désolée pour cet impair. En retournant sur l’application OsmAnd Maps, je ne trouve même plus la Chinoiserie, le bâtiment est revenu tel qu’il était avant ma modification. 

Je ne sais pas trop quoi faire du coup. Y a-t-il une meilleure application IOS pour contribuer à OSM ?

Merci et bonne journée,

Vibuyse
juminet (2021-09-19 06:47:42+00:00): Bonjour, 

Pas de soucis. Je ne connais pas d'autres applications iOS. Sur Android, il y a l'éditeur Vespucci qui est plus complet et l'application StreetComplete qui permet uniquement de compléter des objets existants. OsmAnd est sans doute une des meilleures app pour l'édition sur mobile. 

La grande majorité des contributions se font sur un ordinateur, avec l"éditeur en ligne iD dans openstreetmap.org ou via le programme JOSM. 

Sinon, j'ai remis les tags manquants à l'instant, donc c'est réglé. ;-)

Bonne continuation!

juminet
Vibuyse (2021-09-19 07:54:12+00:00): Merci beaucoup !

Bonne journée,

Vibuyse
syntex (2021-10-24 21:38:34+00:00): Reverted
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Dodko (2021-09-17 08:37:55+00:00): Ten dom má pridelenú adresu - súpisné číslo
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/adresne-body/0/18969556?pos=49.234251,19.323029,18
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/824968/467_11?pos=49.234256,19.323009,21
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-22 15:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111550113 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an alleged art project.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5350 .
ivanbranco (2021-09-20 17:43:51+00:00): Hi tomthomas,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984210581/history

can you fix known Name=* with a proper name tag please?

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
olo81 (2021-09-23 14:53:36+00:00): Do poprawy. Kluby sportowe oznacza się całkiem inaczej. 
Nazwa klubu sportowego to nie nazwa budynku! 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:club%3Dsport
C2oc4 (2021-10-17 06:57:40+00:00): tam się mieści
olo81 (2021-10-17 15:00:36+00:00): tagowanie klubów 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:club%3Dsport
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:29:21+00:00): oki
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
MFlamm (2021-10-26 16:17:26+00:00): Bonjour,
L'Avenue Eugène-Lance est-elle vraiment en sens unique sur toute sa longueur (c-à-d. depuis la mairie de Lancy) ou est-ce une petite erreur d'édition?
MFlamm (2021-11-12 09:47:41+00:00): Après une visite sur place, j'ai précisé l'édition de l'Avenue Eugène-Lance, dont un long tronçon est effectivement passé en sens unique pour les véhicules motorisés. Par contre, il y a une piste cyclable en contresens et c'est important de le préciser afin de préserver un routage optimal des cyclistes!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
olo81 (2021-09-30 16:44:48+00:00): zdublowane obszary, i po drugie nazwa parku to co innego niż obszar chronionego obszaru tak że wiele błędów na raz :/
C2oc4 (2021-10-17 06:56:36+00:00): oki
mardiz (2021-10-07 20:24:38+00:00): Warum hast Du das geändert?
Abandoned:runway steht schon da!
Gruß Martin
dhakasportslive36 (2021-09-17 08:57:43+00:00): this is very side... i have  a some .................................click hear
dhakasportslive36 (2021-09-17 08:58:47+00:00): click hear
pfg21 (2021-10-26 11:42:14+00:00): что вы этими правками хотели сделать ??
поломали контур завода.
на основании каких данных они внесены ??
и допущенны ли эти данные для всеобщего обзорения ??
Химпром так-то весьма режимное предприятие.
Ксения Лукина Ив (2021-10-26 13:42:27+00:00): Добрый день. Правки на основании ген плана предприятия и непосредственного наблюдения. Сделаны для удобства ориентирования персонала. С поручения руководства и только разрешенные к публикации объекты.
pfg21 (2021-10-26 15:02:24+00:00): с разрешения это уже интересно :)
значит внесено как минимум не корректно.
что из себя представляют имена дорожек и имена кварталов ??
Ксения Лукина Ив (2021-10-26 15:21:48+00:00): Наименования дорог согласно генплану и административное деление на кварталы. Дороги автомобильные: грузовые, легковые, общественный транспорт. Это уже обсуждалось. Мне с каждым человеком нужно будет это обсуждать, чтобы не откатывали?
pfg21 (2021-10-29 07:39:15+00:00): конечно.
данные внесимые в осм должны [проверяемы](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C) 
ваши данные не проверяемы, внесены криво, я естественно собираюсь исправлять ваши ошибки и уточняю "что и зачем откуда и почему".
если это обсуждалось
или имеется ген.план с которым можно сравнить 
или иной источник данных
то вам стоит предоставить его во избежание дальнейших глупых вопросов к вам.
dvdhoven (2021-09-17 12:27:38+00:00): even een reminder.
Alle knooppunten en alle routes in een knooppuntnetwerk krijgen de tag network:type=node_network
Ik heb die tag aan kp 14 toegevoegd.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-22 15:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111550113 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an alleged art project.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5350 .
ivanbranco (2021-09-18 19:16:16+00:00): Ciao Marty5550,

per favore aggiungi commenti ai changeset che facciano capire anche agli altri utenti cosa hai modificato.

Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:37:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other and square all rectangular buildings,
Follow the roofline and do not include a yard in a mapping

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111327349
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:35:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings you map and do not connect nodes to each other.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111327399
SomeoneElse (2021-09-18 20:28:13+00:00): Hello,
Just checking - does the Capital Ring Link really extend along Church Street as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12662376 suggests?  Previously https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bhE it just crossed the road?
I'm not at all familiar with this bit of London, hence the question.
Best Regards,
Andy
rskedgell (2021-09-18 20:45:12+00:00): Hi Andy,

I should have spotted that when I extended the footway. It definitely doesn't go up there - I've walked and run most of the Capital Ring.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111389139
SomeoneElse (2021-09-18 20:50:09+00:00): Great - thanks!
jeslop (2021-09-17 14:15:09+00:00): Hola Guilletrass. Ya has recibido avisos de otros usuarios por tus contribuciones. Un campo de fútbol nunca será un parque. Te recomiendo que leas esto antes de seguir mapenado:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Cómo_mapeamos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Hay más, pero es un principio. Y en caso de duda contacta con la comunidad española, que estará encantada de ayudarte.
Te agradecería que revirtieses esos cambios. Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pio2_122 (2021-09-17 10:37:12+00:00): Swoją drogą, czy route=ferry jest tu na miejscu?

Opisałem to szczegółowo w https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=841340#p841340
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-16 04:02:51+00:00): Hello oum13928, Thanks for the mapping contribution.

There is a crossing highway:service id:926104535 and waterbody.(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/984224441)
Please re-check the digitization that the warning occurred.

If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142920162
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-16 04:03:03+00:00): Thankyu
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:32:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111327932
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:31:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the recangular buildings please

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111328032
Bierphysik (2022-09-23 07:09:02+00:00): Hi. Bist Du Dir sicher, dass die Adressen/HAusnummern 65a/b/c so stimmen? Laut Alkis bzw. GIS des Kreises Offenbach ist das alles die Hausnummer 65: https://buergergis.kreis-offenbach.de/
BasicMaster18 (2022-09-23 15:38:46+00:00): Hi, ich habe mich dabei an der Beschilderung vor Ort orientiert, die beispielsweise so aussieht:
https://abload.de/image.php?img=dreieich_an_der_triftacfvn.jpg
Bierphysik (2022-09-24 07:02:26+00:00): Ok, dann ist hier das GIS wohl out-of-date. Danke.
NieWnen (2021-09-17 10:36:58+00:00): Zmiana z track->residential wcale nie czyni drogi bitumiczną. Od tego jest tag surface. Może być zarówno asfaltowa track jak i residential bez nawierzchni.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway