piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naoliv (2016-06-30 18:22:47+00:00): Aline, por gentileza, evite inserir esse tipo de informação no OSM, enquanto não se define o modo correto de uso.

Muitos desses dados que você inseriu são desnecessários, como pode ser visto em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Biological
santamariense (2016-06-30 21:29:29+00:00): Na verdade não deixa de ser interessante. Eu acho que, assim como há o OpenHistoricalMap para mapeamento do que já é história. Poderia ser criado um projeto para este tipo de mapeamento.
naoliv (2016-06-30 21:41:20+00:00): Sim, mas há muita duplicação de informação.
Por exemplo, guardar latitude e longitude não faz sentido (já que essas propriedades já fazem parte do objeto)
País e cidade podem ser obtidos da mesma forma.
Para o nome científico já existe "species", "genus", etc ou mesmo "taxon" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon que "prevents the proliferation of various tags to describe biological components of mapped objects"

Justamente por isso precisa discutir melhor quais tags são válidas ou não na hora de definir esses objetos.
Rizky IRM-ED (2020-07-27 02:04:36+00:00): Hi danbjoseph, I've change the unspecific highway tag as residential highway
Fanny IRM-ED (2020-07-27 03:57:17+00:00): Hi danbjoseph, I've change the unspecific highway tag as residential highway
Anisa IRM-ED (2020-08-24 02:27:57+00:00): Hi danbjoseph, I've change the unspecific highway (way 428275399) tag as service highway
Anisa IRM-ED (2020-08-24 02:29:02+00:00): Hi danbjoseph, I've change the unspecific highway (way 428275397) tag as service highway
SomeoneElse (2016-07-04 14:13:48+00:00): Oops!  I think that something has gone a bit wrong here.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106345011/history#map=18/53.22836/-1.46886 seems to share nodes with 241929548, which doesn't match the situation on the ground.  When you walk along that path you don't walk with one foot on people's back gardens and one foot in the park, you're in the park all the time.
Could you change it back so that the path reflects reality please?
Cheers,
Andy
AmyCupcake (2016-07-11 18:00:07+00:00): issue repaired https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40661108
made residential area follow the fences, and also moved it north of the river where there are no buildings south of it
Wulf4096 (2018-08-15 20:35:34+00:00): Hallo!
Ich frage mich, ob diese Straße dort tatsächlich die Nordkanalstraße ist, oder ob das nicht doch die Repsoldstraße ist.
Ich war da und konnte keinerlei Beschilderung finden.
Kannst du deine Änderung noch nachvollziehen?
Oleboy (2018-08-16 18:34:12+00:00): Ja, kann ich nachvollziehen, kenne das wie meine Westentasche.
Eigentlich ist das alles vollkommen egal, wie man diese Einfädelspur- mehr ist es nicht, wie du weisst- nennt. Ich fand Nordkanalstrasse logischer bzw abwegig, die Fahrspur Repsoldstr. zu nennen. Gebäude an der Einfädelspur sind, insoweit überhaupt vorhanden, ohnehin der Spaldingstrasse zugeordnet. Ja, meine Änderung war nicht nur gut-, sondern auch ernstgemeint, aber nicht bierernst ;)
Rizky IRM-ED (2020-07-29 02:14:26+00:00): Hi Carson L, I've changed highway classification as Residental Highway. thanks
maraf24 (2016-06-30 23:04:11+00:00): Myślę, że szkołę też by było warto dodać:)
GerdP (2017-08-23 08:53:39+00:00): Hi!
I've changed typo highway=bridge, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51367091
What is meant with surface=boardwalk?
skorasaurus (2016-07-02 12:18:15+00:00): hi, welcome to openstreetmap and nice addition of adding the bike path!
DD1GJ (2016-06-30 22:49:54+00:00): Hallo Weltreise, Du bringst mit Deinen Edits leider sehr viel durcheinander: Doppelte Einträge (Back-Factory), Gebäude über Gebäude (H&M, Saturn), Knoten über Knoten (H&M, Müller), falsche Tags (Textilunternehmen, Bekleidungsgeschäft, Kaufhaus)

Bevor Du aufräumst, arbeite Dich bitte gründlich ein:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Stereo (2016-06-30 21:42:32+00:00): Thanks again :)
Hb- (2025-11-14 12:11:54+00:00): Warum wurden hiermit Adressen von den Gebäuden gelöst und auf neue Punkte verschoben?
maraf24 (2016-06-30 23:01:42+00:00): Uchwała jeszcze nie obowiązuje.
nammala (2016-07-20 06:38:09+00:00): Hi  fredyaguirrevalencia,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. May I know the reason behind deleting this amenity=market_place . It exists in OSM check it out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace.

cheers,
krishna
5m4u9 (2016-07-03 07:22:58+00:00): gracias por la edición, pero voy a revertir. 

Moviste los datos en lugar de mover la imagen satelital... casi todo elemento hay que mapearlo con uso de gps en el lugar...
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:14:22+00:00): never edited here - what are you on about?
santamariense (2016-06-30 21:38:15+00:00): Ela vende cosméticos? Ou é cabeleireira? Ou tem um salão de beleza?
Ricardo Bock (2016-06-30 23:07:03+00:00): É um salão. Saiu com outra categoria aqui no open maps. Vou reeditar. Obrigado pelo comentário.
user_5359 (2016-07-01 04:17:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the key walgreens with any readable value. Did you mean, that the building nearby has a phamarcy withe the Name Walgreens? The correct information should be amenity=pharmacy  (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy) and name=Walgreens. If you could add some other information like the street: it will be fine.
user_5359 (2016-09-12 19:37:19+00:00): I have delte this misleading information (because you didn’t responce on the request)
Müszi (2016-10-16 08:13:42+00:00): Salut!

Văd că ai modificat drumul DC265 (way #359181671) ca fiind asfaltat la Ic Ponor.

Din păcate este doar drum pietruit, după cum se vede și din fotografia alăturată, făcută în data de 08-10-2016:

http://kepfeltoltes.hu/161016/p1320819_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg

Acum ne-am plimbat doar de la Padiș până la Ic Ponor, dar anul trecut am fost până la satul de vacanță, și drumul a fost asfaltat doar pâna la pod.

Am să schimb înapoi în drum pietruit, iar dacă treci pe-acolo, te rog să verifici până unde este asfaltat.

-- 
Zsolt
user_870861 (2016-08-06 11:55:36+00:00): there is a large number of exactly duplicated ways and node
(buildings, roads, barriers, street_lamp, stops ...)
with your changesets :
41224595 vs 40403208 or 40618846 or 40978488
41243789 vs 40403208 or	40618846 or 40978488 or 41224595
JRosinus (2016-08-06 15:03:54+00:00): So how do I get rid of them? I assumed when I resolved conflicts that that type of thing would go away.
user_870861 (2016-08-06 17:30:00+00:00): you can see some issues there :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=17&lat=26.6181456&lon=-81.9511810&item=1230&level=1

you can dowload area and use josm's validator to fix the conflicts .
JRosinus (2016-08-06 18:30:44+00:00): Thanks! I think I fixed it all. If not, please let me know.
user_870861 (2016-08-06 19:02:05+00:00): when you fix with josm, way are deleted but not the nodes...
- You add to fix also orphaned nodes, duplicated nodes like shops or highway=stop 
- other issues there :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=15&lat=26.62075&lon=-81.95458&item=0
user_870861 (2016-08-06 20:55:07+00:00): + orphaned nodes in josm is in warnings = No tags - unconnected nodes without physical tags
+ duplicadted nodes in josm is also in  warnings
kolosovski (2016-07-01 13:36:37+00:00): Dear Marios!
Please stop assigning the "name=building" tag to buildings you draw as it is needless. Also please remove these names where they're exist.
building=yes is enough on a first stage. Also you may want to refer osm wiki for more relevant instructions.
In addition - recently you've marked the whole island as building=yes and whole Cyprus appeared to be as a single house in OSM! So please, be careful in your edits
AgusQui (2016-07-02 00:30:01+00:00): Gracias por el aporte! 
Pusiste como que todo el terreno es un edificio (con el tag building), deberías usar landuse=industrial, y si quieres adentro dibujar los edificios con building=industrial
Cualquier duda avisame.
ccamara (2016-07-22 11:03:30+00:00): Abans de revertir aquest changeset, podries explicar el criteri que has seguit per a fer aquest canvi a l'Escola Casas? Pel que veig has tret informació dels edificis existents i has afegit informació redundant de l'escola. Segons la wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool la informació de l'escola (amenity=school) només es posa al recinte. A més, es pot posar a cada edifici building=school, tal i com estava abans.
ccamara (2016-07-22 11:13:03+00:00): Ups, no parlo amb mi mateix, sino que m'he equivocat de changeset. El que feia referència és aquest altre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40524006
geri-oc (2016-07-02 17:45:57+00:00): Schön wäre es wenn du im Forum berichtest, ob alles klar ist ...
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54986
Gruß Gerd
user_5359 (2016-07-01 03:53:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
user_5359 (2016-07-01 03:52:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter .
dgitto (2016-07-01 08:04:36+00:00): Welcome OSM.
Are you sure of the supermarket's position? It's in the middle of the way! Try again (but there is a Conad mapped 140 m southward)
VA00 (2016-07-03 08:47:03+00:00): Zostawiłeś linię bez żadnych atrybutów. Miała to być jak znam teren wąska, ledwo widoczna ścieżka. Rejon niezwykle trudny do zmapowania, las, głębokie wąwozy - wymaga znajomości terenu na pamięć + danych z lidaru i zbitki tras GPS. Proponuję zacząć od czegoś łatwiejszego.
pan_borsuk (2016-07-04 16:02:46+00:00): rozkminiam dopiero edycje na osm. po ustanowieniu lini .. trzeba czekać niecały dzień i wyjechałem akurat wtedy . chciałem linię po uzupełniać oczywiście. jako projekt rozwojowy. najchętniej to bym sie spotkał jeśli masz doświadczenie w osm. pozdrawiam :-)

ps. do czego lidar by się tu przydał :-D
russdeffner (2016-07-05 23:25:38+00:00): This is not correct, although road quality is poor, it is still a county 'maintained' "residential" road, looking to fix.
user_5359 (2016-07-01 03:53:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlibrary
mapper306 (2016-07-07 03:00:05+00:00): Did I get it right? Feel free to fix what I missed, I will check your change.
user_5359 (2016-07-07 04:28:21+00:00): Yes you did. If a building has two functionalities, the best way is to add two points (every with a separate description) and let the building only with the building tags.

Feel free to move the points in the right building part.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-23 21:57:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4274825617/history has RT=30 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
icmps (2016-07-01 04:07:19+00:00): Reorder nodes of way so opentripplanner will properly route a car
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-01 05:22:44+00:00): Nėra prasmės įrašinėti, kas kažkada kažkur „buvo“ :-)
vt100 (2016-07-01 07:46:21+00:00): Hallo Gürsel, vielen Dank für Deine erste Bearbeitung bei Openstreetmap! Ich habe den Eintrag noch korrigiert, aber dennoch danke für den Hinweis.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 04:35:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are not a church! And please move the point to the right building.
highflyer74 (2016-07-02 18:10:27+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall war opening_hours noch etwas krumm ;-) (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours)

Wenn Gebäude abgerissen werden, aber noch auf Satellitenbildern zu sehen sind, empfiehlt es sich, diese nicht zu löschen, sondern mit demolished:building=* zu taggen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix). Dann werden sie nicht mehr als Gebäude erkannt, und es wird verhindert, daß der nächste User sie wieder neu einzeichnet, weil er denkt, daß da noch Gebäude fehlen.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

Oliver
mavl (2016-07-01 14:41:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Прошу прощения за беспокойство, но номера телефонов записаны таким образом, что с использованием программы Maps.me автоматически никто не сможет дозвониться в добавленную вами компанию. Человек сможет позвонить в эту компанию только если наберёт один из указанных номеров вручную. Дополнительную информацию можно получить по адресу [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone].  
  
Если вам нужна помощь, то вы можете попросить о ней здесь, написав комментарий в обсуждении этого пакета правок.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nammala (2016-07-05 06:40:28+00:00): Hi BOTP,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and the edits of yours looks good. Can you once check your changeset comment before uploading please.

Cheers,
krishna
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 14:40:34+00:00): the shop is not inside a building, is this correct? Or is the building maybe not correct?
andrea di mambro (2016-07-05 18:25:49+00:00): There is a building on the corner, the shop is on it.
Ars-UA (2016-07-01 07:31:07+00:00): Почта находится на ул. Марьинской 214.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 05:06:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are not a church!
Supaplex (2016-07-06 16:47:15+00:00): 跑到大海裡了
Supaplex (2016-07-05 17:46:26+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-07-01 10:00:35+00:00): name跟中文name:zh不一樣，是那家公司呢？
PrzemekP (2016-07-10 19:30:58+00:00): Witaj, skąd pobrałaś dane na BK?
Robiłaś może ścieżkę gps?
Bo ja jestem co drugi dzień na tym mopie i wiedzę coraz większe głupoty wprowadzane przez użytkowników.
Basia | Yanosik (2016-07-11 12:39:16+00:00): Cześć,
dodałam BK zgodnie z info na ich oficjalnej stronie.
Jednak rzeczywiście ten po wschodniej stronie zostanie dopiero otwarty wkrótce, dlatego zmieniłam jego status na building=construction. Niestety bez daty otwarcia, gdyż nie jest ona podana.
Jak zauważysz zmianę w sytuacji możesz dokonać odpowiedniej edycji na mapie? albo dać znać to pozmieniam info:)
PrzemekP (2016-07-12 10:38:03+00:00): Moja dobra rada: never ever nie umieszczaj ani budynków ani dróg itp itd czegokolwiek, czego nie widziałaś na własne oczy, bądź nie masz na to namiarów GPS (np. OSMTracker), nie nanoś budynków na drogi - chyba że mają tunele...., zadaszenia itp (ale wówczas trzeba wiedzieć jak to otagować)
To nie wyścig kto najwięcej czegokolwiek narysuje i nazmienia - tutaj liczy się rzetelność i zgodność z rzeczywistością.
Ja też miałem podobne początki, dlatego też zapraszam na Wiki Openstreetmap
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632
Basia | Yanosik (2016-07-12 11:07:06+00:00): Dziękuję za porady.
Troszkę zmyliło mnie to, że po drugiej stronie budynek znajduje się na drodze i dlatego pozwoliłam sobie postawić BK w tym miejscu.
Początki zawsze są ciekawe;)
Pozdrawiam, Basia
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
hsc666 (2016-07-02 11:22:59+00:00): You created a tourism = viewpoint in a bookstore. So it should be a place worth visiting, often high, with a good view of surrounding countryside or notable buildings. 

Do you mean that seriously?
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Warin61 (2016-07-02 05:05:53+00:00): Hi,
Found you ... :) .. could not find you before I made the change on the wiki.
 I think the original access tag is for motor vehicles... and those may well be restricted here. Most mappers only consider motor vehicles...
swanilli (2016-07-02 07:52:18+00:00): Yes. There is a sign on a gate that says "Rail Corridor" and "Authorised vehicles only" but the tracks are in Garrawarra State Conservation area not on the Rail Corridor which is only 30 m wide.
swanilli (2016-07-02 08:41:53+00:00): On checking 30 m is not accurate. I have read rail corridor is "15m from the outermost rail on either side" but it is clearly more than this in most places, 60 m or more. It does not alter conclusion for these tracks which are well outside rail corridor.
Warin61 (2016-07-02 21:42:49+00:00): The sign says 
"Authorized Vehicles Only" ... not just "Rail Corridor". 
See http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/Walking-tracks/Cawleys-Road-trail for who can use it... looks to me to EXCLUDE MOTOR VEHICLES! 
If necessary I will ring them and confirm that this trail is CLOSED TO MOTOR VEHICLES!!!!!
rene78 (2016-07-01 10:27:22+00:00): Hi,

statt building=yes ist vielleicht entrance=main besser? Das Gebäude wird ja schon durch die Fläche abgebildet.

Gruss
René
hintergrundrauschen (2016-07-03 06:37:57+00:00): Salut René, danke für den Tipp. Bin neu auf OSM und übe noch mit dem editieren. Werde Deinen Ratschlag berücksichtigen. Falls ich es nicht korrekt hinkriege, kannst Du die Verbesserung selbstverständlich vornehmen. Gruss
MKnight (2016-07-01 09:42:58+00:00): was hats denn mit diesen Änderungen auf sich? Der Fahrradladen sieht ja ganz ok aus, aber was ist mit den anderen 3 weit verstreuten V1-Pois? Mindestens einer davon existiert real nicht.
MKnight (2016-07-16 10:32:29+00:00): nochmal geprüft, scheint ok zu sein, auch wenn das CS reichlich merkwürdig ist ob seiner Ausdehnung.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-23 22:57:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428404853 is "section 20" of what?
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SnowDiver (2016-07-01 07:51:15+00:00): Ich habe versehentlich den alten changeset-Kommentar im Editor unverändert stehen gelassen. Natürlich handelt es sich nicht bei der Änderung um Waldwege, sondern um Kontaktdaten der Pension-Am-Hafen in Glückstadt.
marczoutendijk (2016-07-01 17:50:03+00:00): I corrected your edit, because the name Frnzy was already on address node 27, but without the amenity=cafe.
I merged them.
Constable (2016-07-01 17:20:00+00:00): Hey Sir, why the hell did you change the obelisk name?
This node belongs to the obelisk, not to Piazza Navona.
Please, next time make sure you know what you are doing before editing the map.
I'm going to fix the name right now.
Cheers
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 15:00:46+00:00): Thank you Constable for cleaning this up. Unfortunately maps.me edits are mostly low in quality (also because the editing functions are very limited), and their users are not very responsive.
Warin61 (2016-08-24 01:09:10+00:00): Hi,
Building=residential Way: 428418578 should be building=farm (main residential building of farm) .. and ways 428418576 and 428418572 (were building=farm) don't look like residence .. so I have them as building=yes. 
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dfarm
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:24:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2021-02-25 22:18:43+00:00): Ciekawy tag wymyśliłeś: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4275231814 :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-26 08:20:54+00:00): :)

Używam też https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fixme%3Arequires_aerial_image https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fixme%3Ause_better_tagging_scheme (tam gdzie wizyta na miejscu nie pomoże już więc pokazywanie w moim zmodyfikowanym StreetComplete nic już nie daje)
Warin61 (2019-01-29 05:04:00+00:00): Hi,

It is much much better to have a separate relation for the tree area!

So I have;

Deleted tag natural=wood from the National Park relation.

Added new relation for the tree area - so it does not follow the NP boundary, has holes for non tree areas. It is fairly coarse, but better than using the NP boundary.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
patzi (2016-07-01 09:42:34+00:00): Hallo,
bitte setzen Sie sich bevor sie Änderungen an bestehenden Daten vollziehen vernünftig mit OpenStreetMap auseinander. Ich musste die Änderugnen rückgängig machen, da Sie die Grenze von Göttingen bearbeiten haben und Göttingen dann nun "Göttingen, wageplatz" heißen würde.
Ein guter Einstiegspunkt ist hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Ich habe versucht Ihre gewünschten Änderungen, die ich interpretiert habe einzutragen.

Grüße
patzi (2016-07-01 09:44:54+00:00): Das Büro ist bereits eingetragen gewesen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3913509850
malenki (2016-07-01 14:02:40+00:00): Hallo brain1287,

wenn auf dem Neumarkt ein neues Wohngebäude¹ errichtet wurde wäre es sicher sinnvoll, den Parkplatz entsprechend zu verkleinern.

Viele Grüße
malenki

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428428180
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-07-01 23:18:17+00:00): Proszę zerknąć i zapoznać się z właściwym sposobem tagowania adresów: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
letihu (2016-07-19 20:34:53+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428432238/history
fehlt noch alles. Die Linie ist auch mit nichts verbunden.
Luuuddooo (2016-07-01 18:38:54+00:00): Bonjour,
La valeur highway=pedestrian correspond à une rue piétonne mais où les voiture peuvent quand même passer si autorisée. A mon avis il aurait fallut garder highway=footway pour ce genre de sentier: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61895003 

car une voiture ne peut physiquement pas passer là, ce n'est pas une rue.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Durko_freemap (2016-07-01 11:48:07+00:00): Zdravim,
ta "vlecka" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428437234#map=19/49.02698/19.78208) sa krizi s cestou 2356. Myslim, ze je tam priecestie. Bolo by vhodne to opravit jednym spolocnym bodom(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:railway%3Dlevel_crossing). Durko
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2016-07-05 17:44:38+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-05 16:23:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2016-07-02 21:23:18+00:00): Zlikwidowali przystanek?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2117666165/history