piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TreeTracks (2022-08-15 01:12:12+00:00): To clarify my message above, the W end of Buckie Road is asphalt, as you added. It's the eastern end only that I cant confirm using available imagery.Thanks again.
bob3bob3 (2022-08-15 04:14:39+00:00): Hi Ian

Pretty sure I never directly covered the road with street imagery except the Newell Hwy end. My GPS history from 2016-22 also has no Croppa Creek transit. (still having Mapillary upload delays. GPS records may imply I made some other note)

The whole road was probably one way, that I split for unpaved/asphalt. It would be unusual for me to set "paved" rather than asphalt so I probably mouse fumbled. I agree that the current paved section at the Croppa Creek end should be unpaved.
TreeTracks (2022-08-15 05:40:47+00:00): Thank for your quick reply. I thought the 'paved' tag was probably a hangover from an earlier edit rather than yours. I'll fix it up now. Best wishes.
canfe (2021-04-27 04:15:39+00:00): La surface del tracciato non è in qualche modo definibile?
Se ci sei appena passato magari ti ricordi...
30x26 (2021-04-27 20:44:36+00:00): non ci sono passato ma ho visto l'imbocco dall'alto e non e' certo "paved" come segnato in precedenza. molto probabilmente e' surface=rock  ciao.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 11:40:53+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633192

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 11:46:36+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633194

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633195

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633196

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633197

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633198

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633199

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633200

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633201

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633206

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633209

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633210

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633215

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12633216

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
pio2_122 (2021-04-27 06:12:17+00:00): Oznakowane ścieżki pieszo-rowerowe oznaczamy jako highway=path+
bicycle=designated+
foot=designated. Nie mapujemy ich oddzielnie, co zrobiłeś w tej zmianie. Zmieniłeś też prawidłowe oznaczenie już dodanej ścieżki typu "DDRiP" na oddzielny chodnik i drogę dla rowerów. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Pozosta.C5.82e_drogi)

Tutaj postaram się to już sam naprawić, więc jest to uwaga na przyszłość.
mariotomo (2021-04-27 12:33:10+00:00): hi, thank you for your contribution. I see from the tag given by iD "resolved:outdated_tags:deprecated_tags = 16".  that's relative to waterway=riverbank, isn't it?  funny that I looked into this recently in the Wiki, and I missed the "deprecated" status!  anyway, thank you.
MapSpot (2021-04-27 17:17:32+00:00): Hi Mario, it's alright. Although the iD editor considers the tag deprecated, it is still a valid tag on JOSM and the general OSM wiki community for now. Since 2016, there has been a very gradual global transition from the classic waterway=riverbank tagging scheme to natural=water + water=river for river areas.
For that reason, I did not want to call the classic tags "deprecated" in my changeset comment. The main reason I converted these river areas to the newer tagging system was because I noticed other river areas along this river used the new tags, and data-reading issues can occur when two tagging systems are mixed.
mariotomo (2021-04-27 17:24:30+00:00): Hi MapSpot2, thanks for the reply. in Panamá "we" were using mostly waterway=riverbank, but some contributors started adding the newer scheme, and converting old data to it. I tried to ignite a discussion on our local preference, but in the meanwhile we're slowly passively migrating away from the waterway scheme. we're so few here in the country, that resistance is absolutely futile. :-)
MapSpot (2021-04-28 01:13:12+00:00): At this point, it appears that 55% of the river areas in Panama actually use the new scheme, which may be a good thing, considering most countries in the Americas also currently favor it.

If you have any concerns about some outside contributors recklessly handling Panama's rivers, so should take it up with the user Zelonewolf, as he has been working with the local communities of many countries to "modernize" their river data in a careful non-mechanical way which fixes many more issues than just switching tags around. You can read more about his efforts on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernization
L'imaginaire (2021-04-27 06:28:32+00:00): thanks!
Glassman (2021-09-27 21:50:08+00:00): Adding toll=yes to the motorway made the entire motorway a toll road. It should only be one lane. 

I dropped the toll and name. Not sure how to tag just one lane as toll.
cool_llama (2021-04-27 05:19:46+00:00): Hola, los nodos recuperados (farmacia san esteban y el guacamayo) ya no existen. Los eliminaré indicando tales motivos.
ovruni (2021-04-27 05:33:25+00:00): Hola, que bueno que ya este funcionando el envío de comentarios, en la tarde intenté enviarle un mensaje pero me daba error. En los conjuntos de cambios 103656990 y 4347704359 se mencionan los textos "Actualizar lugares" y "Actualizar informacion" respectivamente, pero ambos consistían en eliminar objetos, por favor considere revisar la documentación sobre los buenos conjuntos de cambios.[0] En caso que un negocio haya dejado de operar y tenga otras etiquetas como la dirección, solamente retire las etiquetas relacionadas al negocio, ya que al eliminar el nodo completo se pierde el resto de información (como en este caso la relacionada a la dirección) y no se mantiene el historial [1].
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
cool_llama (2021-04-27 05:39:05+00:00): Vale, entiendo. Disculpa las molestias, espero no darte mucho trabajo con ls últimos cambios que hice. Estaré más atento a cómo hacer los cambios.
Hungerburg (2021-04-27 10:13:41+00:00): Hallo ♥ Tirol :) Abgerissene Häuser können als "demolished:building" quasi nur versteckt werden, kommt wohl meist eh wieder ein Haus dort hin; dann sind Adressen schon da.

Wenn sich nur die Geometrie ändert, aus ♥ zur Historie, nicht löschen und neu zeichnen; eventuell macht "Geometrie ersetzen" aus den JOSM "utilsplugin2" das einfacher
user_12861758 (2021-05-02 06:53:32+00:00): OpenStreeMap ist eine Datenbank. Früheres bleibt erhalten, und steht so zum Beispiel für eine Visualisierung der Gebäudeentwicklung in einer Region per Abfrage, weiterhin voll zur Verfügung.
habi (2021-04-27 09:26:20+00:00): Ciao Soumbill 
You have added a lot of `builddings=yes` in this changeset, which is a typo. 
I changed all these to `building=yes` to make the buildings on the map :) 
Have a good day, 
Greetings from Switzerland 
habi
Nano36100 (2021-05-05 15:57:33+00:00): Bitte Tracktype für die Wege 935573522 und 105068846 berichtigen! Sieht im Satellitenbild nicht nach grade1 aus. - Danke.
clerie (2021-05-05 16:56:04+00:00): Ich kann  dir leider nicht sagen, welcher Track Type das ist. Das Atrribut steht da seit 10 Jahren drin. Ich habe den Fehler wieder eröffnet.
mueschel (2021-04-27 08:31:48+00:00): Please check your edits. 
You added hundreds of objects with misspelled tags, e.g.
builddings  -> building
buildding -> building
hut=yes  -> this tag shouldn't be there

There are also many cases of these tags on nodes - they should appear on the outline of buildings only.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 21:52:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101702124, 101702307, 101702610, 101702809, 101702994, 101703169, 101703378, 101703551, 101703634, 101703855, 101704376, 101704426, 101704471, 101704716, 101705413, 101705461, 101705509, 101705546, 101705594, 101705647, 101705697, 101705752, 101705802, 101705968, 101706021, 101706076, 101706113, 101706172, 101706207, 101706237, 102606603, 102606766, 102606876, 102607054, 102607251, 102607305, 102607398, 102607471, 102770444, 102770511, 102770553, 102770590, 102770836, 102770900, 102770943, 102771008, 102771080, 102771139, 102771173, 102771234, 102771266, 102771302, 102771332, 102771402, 102772083, 102772143, 102772217, 102772428, 102772479, 102773219, 102773644, 102774023, 102774055, 102774113, 102774155, 102774202, 102774247, 102774291, 102774366, 102774415, 102774472, 102774523, 102774568, 102774612, 102774688, 102774727, 102774881, 102775220, 102775274, 102775344, 102775376, 102775423, 102775464, 102775499, 102775557, 102775592, 102775657, 102775705, 102775756, 102775792, 102775858, 102775897, 102775947, 102775981, 102776030, 102776073, 102776149, 102776196, 102776238, 102776279, 102776322, 102776376, 102776423, 102776463, 102776523, 102776572, 102776617, 102776659, 102776701, 102776892, 102776936, 102777110, 102777154, 102777221, 102777256, 102777300, 102777338, 102777405, 102777472, 102777520, 102777594, 102777653, 102777699, 102777740, 102777773, 102777848, 102777892, 102777947, 102777986, 102778036, 102778097, 102778139, 102778187, 102778237, 102778318, 102778368, 102778419, 102778474, 102778519, 102778576, 102778618, 102779459, 102779540, 102779743, 102779821, 102779880, 102780015, 102780078, 102780154, 102780235, 102780359, 102780430, 102780490, 102780536, 102780595, 102780652, 102780698, 102780766, 102780823, 102780873, 102780926, 102780986, 102781040, 102781085, 102781139, 102781269, 102781749, 102781820, 102781870, 102781927, 102782073, 102782143, 102782207, 102782247, 102782290, 102782335, 102782381, 102782435, 102782608, 102782684, 102783177, 102783391, 102784164, 102785189, 102785307.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-26 22:11:36+00:00): 14 ways failed update revert.  All had been fixed by other mappers, apart from a couple that I've fixed.
skquinn (2022-06-29 09:03:55+00:00): Hi,

In the future, could you please remember to check for lane count and lane use tags and update them, particularly when converting a road from two-way to one-way? Thanks, I (and others) would appreciate it.
Raindeer (2022-06-29 14:23:33+00:00): Hi, this changeset was made more than a year ago, so I don't remember any specifics, but I only update information I know to be true, so if there were missing tags, it was because I didn't have that information, or because it was already correct.
skorpion62 (2021-05-05 07:50:46+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

ich finde es ja schön, dass Du sehr viel in OSM mappst, nur solltest Du keine richtigen Bezeichnungen in halb richtige ändern. 

Mapper jmsbert hat vor ca 2 Jahren diese kombinierten Fuß-und Radwege mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign DE:240 richtig korrigiert.
Warum hast Du für diesen Wege die richtige Bezeichnung für einen kombinierten Fuß-und Radweg wieder in einen Radweg mit Fußgängerbenutzung umgewandelt?
In Deuschland werden kombinierte Fuß-und Radwege mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign DE:240 mit dem Schlüssel „highway = path“ gemappt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336968231

Dieses Problem hatten wir vor über einem Jahr schon einmal. Da hattest Du in meiner Gegend fast alle richtigen kombinierten Fuß-und Radwege mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign DE:240 in einen Radweg mit Fußgängerbenutzung umgewandelt.

Bitte korrigiere diese Wege wieder.

Viele Grüße skorpion62
skorpion62 (2021-05-17 08:47:05+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
es wäre sehr schön, wenn Du Dich melden würdest und meine Frage beantwortest.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
NGL-engel (2021-06-01 11:54:47+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
   entschuldige, ich hatte schon lange nicht mehr in mein Maileingang geschaut. Tut mir Leid. 
Zum Thema, ich habe die Attribute von einem Administrator gegenchecken lassen - es ist (leider) beides richtig und somit schon seit Jahren ein Streitpunkt auf OSM.
Soweit ich mich erinnere hatten wir beide uns in diesem Punkt auf einen "Waffenstillstand" geeinigt - ich ändere Deine Wege nicht und Du nicht meine. 
Gruß NGL-engel
skorpion62 (2021-06-01 14:20:46+00:00): Hallo NGL_engel,

ich weiß, dass man früher einen Radweg gemappt hat. Zu der Zeit gab es aber noch nicht die Feinheiten im Mappen wie heute. 

Das war aber jetzt nicht meine Frage, denn die lautete:
Mapper jmsbert hat vor ca 2 Jahren diese kombinierten Fuß-und Radwege mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign DE:240 richtig korrigiert.
Warum hast Du für diesen Weg die richtige Bezeichnung für einen kombinierten Fuß-und Radweg wieder in einen Radweg mit Fußgängerbenutzung umgewandelt?
In Deuschland werden kombinierte Fuß-und Radwege mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign DE:240 mit dem Schlüssel „highway = path“ gemappt. 

Jetzt nochmal, warum? 
Du schreibst ja selber, es ist beides richtig(nicht meine Meinung). Warum dann die Änderung?

Dann lass doch die richtig gemappten kombinierten Fuß-und Radwege auch so stehen und ändere sie nicht wieder in ein altes Format um.
Das kann ich jetzt nicht verstehen.

Viele Grüße skorpion62

PS. Du schreibst: Soweit ich mich erinnere hatten wir beide uns in diesem Punkt auf einen "Waffenstillstand" geeinigt - ich ändere Deine Wege nicht und Du nicht meine. 

Ich hatte Dir damals schon geantwortet: Wenn ich Fehler von Dir finde, werde ich sie auch korrigieren, oder Dich auch anschreiben.
Das werde ich auch weiterhin so halten.
skorpion62 (2021-06-01 14:30:01+00:00): Noch ein PS: Ich wünsche mir, dass diese unsere Diskussionen, die schon mehrere Jahre in dieser Art laufen, sich ein verantwortlicher Administrator von OSM einmal anschaut und seine Meinung dazu sagt.
maro21 (2021-04-28 19:41:32+00:00): Cześć. Jeśli droga ma być service, to dochodzące do niej drogi chyba też?:). Teraz są tracki po obu stronach
Olga | Yanosik (2021-04-28 20:07:01+00:00): No własnie miałam problem z tymi drogami. Na zdjęciach są to piaszczyste nieutwardzone drogi, sam wiadukt jest asfaltowy/betonowy. Może zmienię ten północy dojazd na service unpaved? On przynajmniej prowadzi do zabudowań i ulicy. Ruchu pojazdów na wiadukcie nie notujemy w naszej bazie.
maro21 (2021-05-05 20:28:03+00:00): Ja nie wiem jak będzie poprawnie. Te drogi chyba faktycznie prowadzą w pole, więc i wiadukt to chyba też track (jak było wcześniej).
Olga | Yanosik (2021-05-06 11:48:41+00:00): Po małej dyskusji w ramach edytorów zmieniłam na footway z możliwością przejazdu rowerem.
Syl (2023-12-27 22:47:49+00:00): Bonsoir, j'ai annulé la modification du nom du restaurant, le nom était le bon.
!bm (2021-05-26 18:45:15+00:00): this does not seem to be a tram_level_crossing. thus reverted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103662995
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101681579, 101892646, 101893244, 101899890, 102362914, 102382930, 102385878, 102435795, 102435969, 102435995, 102436626, 102436689, 102514872, 102514987, 102524563, 102524663, 102524831, 102524975, 102525844, 102526067, 102526301, 102527025, 102527965, 102529299, 102529854, 102530385, 102530968, 102531187, 102531475, 102531759, 102595222, 102595769, 102596078, 102596364, 102596407, 102596571, 102596619, 102596699, 102597194, 102597240, 102597286, 102597347, 102597395, 102597468, 102597641, 102597838, 102597901, 102597971, 102598194, 102598325, 102598424, 102598494, 102598667, 102598847, 102598892, 102598963, 102599000, 102599388, 102599501.
kaltuna (2021-10-07 04:46:47+00:00): Hallo, diesen Teil des Rad/Fußwegs am Schwanheimer Ufer hast Du mit bridge=yes versehen. Dabei kann es sich offentlichtlich nur um einen Fehler handeln, oder ? Machst Du das bitte rückgängig ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37404172
Viele Grüße
mapuit (2022-01-11 00:36:57+00:00): Hi kaltuna,
sorry, mach ich wieder weg. Das war tatsächlich ein Fehler.
Beste Grüße
mapvid
user_10714872 (2021-04-27 05:04:32+00:00): Hello, this path(茂南大道西,茂南大道中,茂南大道东) is not primary
jumbanho (2021-12-08 20:37:23+00:00): Hi, you changed this 8 months ago from what I believe was an actual Subway to what I believe is a ficticious name with a promise to rename.
Please do not do this as this is a live database that people use.  It is considered vandalism.
StefanHRT (2021-04-27 00:25:59+00:00): Moin, Ich finde es klasse, das Du dich jetzt schon eine Weile mit Neuenhagen beschäftigst. Gib mir mal bitte Bescheid, wenn Du eine längere Pause machst (für ein paar Stunden), damit ich einen Feldweg (Das Feld südwestlich der Trainerbahn) entsprechend der Realität wieder korrigieren kann, hier bist Du am Treffpunkt zur construction falsch geraten. Danke. VG
rthik007 (2021-04-28 05:20:36+00:00): Hi ajoramos,
Dragged the NODE: 5315722945
and fix the alignment of primary road
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103744088
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103664757
nmombo12 (2021-04-27 00:35:35+00:00): Clawson is looking good! Nice work.

-Noah
user_5359 (2021-05-02 04:38:32+00:00): Hello! I change your Foothpath=yes to highway=footway. Please check https://www.osm.org/node/8670198881, https://www.osm.org/node/8670198882. Is there any connection?
joost schouppe (2023-09-29 12:56:16+00:00): I guess you learned by now, but please use lifecycle tags or similar for features that don't exist anymore
rthik007 (2021-04-28 05:13:53+00:00): Hi chenluna,
Changed the classification based on the surrounding area and quality of the road
way 935638700
way 935638702
way 935638701
kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103743418
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103665795
portalaventura (2021-04-27 01:32:08+00:00): Matheus Dotel, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Santa Catarina mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsc.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-27 02:34:34+00:00): claudioghirellifh, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
mweper (2021-04-29 00:27:19+00:00): Mati, con respecto al nodo PLACE de Soldini y según la información aportada en OSM, el nodo debería ser VILLAGE y no TOWN, según el estándar de Argentina.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/L%C3%ADmites_pol%C3%ADtico-administrativos#Estandarizaci.C3.B3n_de_lugares
user_5359 (2021-04-27 03:51:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
Arma IRM-ED (2021-06-09 11:31:35+00:00): Hi, Victor 2015
Hope you are doing great

Relation ID: 12499277 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12499277) is marked as turn restriction, but it is not well-formed: Missing a from and/or to member.

Why have you edited the members?

Guidance for relation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Happy Mapping!
Arma IRM-ED (2021-06-10 06:11:39+00:00): Hi, Victor 2015

Please, have a look this relation (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12084945) too

Thank you
portalaventura (2021-04-27 04:08:17+00:00): Vinícius Silva, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 07:46:57+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for Move Central - San Diego POI in changeset 183767064

https://osm.org/changeset/183767064
Ser9ei (2021-04-27 07:58:35+00:00): Very poor geometry of the buildings. Q is the hotkey to make angles right. I don't think the tiny buildings should be mapped with Maxar imagery. Some buildings seem not buildings at all. Not sure about the imagery offset.
blackboxlogic (2021-05-23 12:29:52+00:00): This is not a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103674879
blackboxlogic (2021-05-23 12:35:06+00:00): I see you have already fixed this. Thank you.
blackboxlogic (2021-05-23 12:29:32+00:00): In this edit, that is clearly NOT a building. Please fix this on this edit, and all other edits (you've done this many many times)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103675220