piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2023-01-08 11:30:17+00:00): Lebo ste v predchadzajucom komentari neodpovedali, ci ste to opravili :) A nejde len o 3 body ale tu aj par ciest.

Samozrejme nemyslim cele Slovensko, ale len tie sady zmien, ktore ste robili Vy. Kedze ste minimalne v tejto krizovatke postupovali nespravnym procesom, je mozne, ze rovnake chyby mate inde. Skontrolovali ste si teda starsie sady zmien?
Nejde teda len o tuto krizovatku.
Napr. tu nevidim ziadnu napravu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42928655/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123560727 (tvrdite, ze zdroj je Ortofotomozaika, ale tam je dost tazke odhadnut povrch, a dopravnu znacku povolujucu bicykle uz vobec nie).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113023920 (v lese je malokde povolene bicyklovat a tu ani nie je cyklotrasa, cize preco by sa tu malo dat bicyklovat?).
Takychto podozrivych zmien bez zdroja a dovodu mate dost.
canfe (2022-05-08 09:16:32+00:00): Mi pare che tu abbia spostato il civico che indicava la reale società Cannottieri sul perimetro dell'aera.
I civici vanno lasciati come punto, i building come building, le aree sportive taggate in merito.
Insomma: tutto separato.
Io lascerei il civico come tale, mentre metterei il sito web telefono ecc... alla società.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120632563
EdoBoo (2022-05-09 07:56:04+00:00): È che c'era una duplicazione di dati: c'era il punto, l'areale e l'edificio... ho pensato fosse meglio accorpare un po'.
Se pensi sia meglio fare così sistemalo pure.
francians (2022-05-14 09:59:28+00:00): ciao,

volevo segnalarti che gli attraversamenti pedonali taggati come crossing=uncontrolled, sono giusti... è un errore mettere crossing=zebra fuori dal Regno Unito. Ti suggerisco di usare crossing_ref=zebra per indicare che le strisce sono "zebrate":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing_ref=zebra

e ripristinare il valore "uncontrolled".
Per unirmi a quanto detto sulla duplicazione, ok togliere elementi mappati più di una volta... a questo punto toglierei anche:

leisure=sports_centre
name=Società Reale Canottieri CEREA

dal building (essendo già mappato come poligono esterno) e metterei il valore più idoneo su building:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Sports

probabilmente

sports_hall.
Ultima nota, ti segnalo che building=toilets era giusto e lo ripristinerei:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtoilets

Grazie e buon mapping
Francesco (francians)
EdoBoo (2022-05-14 16:52:18+00:00): Mh, un tempo io utilizzavo "marked" per le strisce pedonali, ma confrontandomi sul gruppo telegram di OSM Italia mi dissero che quella era un tag generico, e che quindi era buona norma mappare con "zebra".

Per il resto ok.
francians (2022-05-15 06:48:16+00:00): marked è quello che propone il preset di iD, uncontrolled lo propone Josm.
Guardando la wiki:

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:crossing

In italiano riporta l'esempio che ti facevo.
In inglese, dice che con iD il tag zebra è stato adottato in tutto il mondo. Io preferisco comunque usare la versione indicata sulla wiki italiana, in quanto non appoggio queste libertà che iD si prende.
BubbaJuice (2022-05-07 20:53:11+00:00): Karson,

You reverted my changeset with no explanation. Why did you revert it? Other mappers have clearly stated undeveloped HOA lands are not to be tagged with leisure=nature_reserve unless they are in-fact so (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119868975). The definition of a nature reserve can be found at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature%20reserve. I have basically said this exact same thing in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120557252. If you continue this practice I might have to get the DWG involved, which I don't want to do.

Regards,
BubbaJuice
mariotomo (2022-05-06 21:02:13+00:00): hola. curiosidad: ese que en el comentario defines "edificio Violeta", cómo se llama oficialmente? pues era "Corporación Financiera Del País", luego "Panacredit (David)", y ahora pusiste "Violeta Building", nota bene, en inglés.  cuál sería?
Alvarado2510 (2022-08-16 15:25:39+00:00): Buenos días, Mario en Panamá existe una gama de edificios que su nombre esta en ingles u otro idioma, creo que los nombre no hay un tema en especifico, por el idioma.
Ahora si tu consideras que de debe colocar en español y también hacer referencia en ingles, por mi no hay tema seria tu punto de vista, puedes editarlos y modificar lo si crees mejore la edición.
mariotomo (2023-01-29 20:13:40+00:00): hola. no tengo un punto de vista, sólo pregunto: cómo se refiere la gente del lugar a este edificio? "Edificio Violeta" como lo haces en tu comentario, o "VIoleta Building" como lo pusiste en el elemento? o ambos? acuérdate de 'name:es' y 'name:en', al lado de 'name'.
Ray29 (2022-05-29 05:16:19+00:00): I have undone your changes because I believe this is not an industrial area named  SUSSY FORTNITE CHUNGUS AMONGUS BURGER SCHOOL. If this is incorrect and this is indeed an industrial area with the name SUSSY FORTNITE CHUNGUS AMONGUS BURGER SCHOOL, please contact me with proof.
mariotomo (2022-05-08 15:47:05+00:00): hola. mira que "shop=farm" quiere decir: »Una tienda que vende productos regionales, de temporada y recién cosechados«.
por suerte pusiste la descripción, que indica que en probablemente quieres "shop=agrarian" »una tienda profesional que trabaja a menudo con empresas agrícolas.« o sea »Tienda o almacén especializado en la venta de insumos agrícolas, tales como: pesticidas, fertilizantes, semillas certificadas, piensos, herramientas agrícolas, recambios para maquinaria agrícola, productos medicamentosos, etc.«
Alvarado2510 (2022-08-16 15:54:32+00:00): Mario muchas gracias casualmente busca algo que se asemejara a "Agraria", no le conocía, use farm porque en su momento fue lo que encontré, agradezco apoyo.
trial (2023-05-08 20:36:08+00:00): > hopfully rightly marked
What do you mean by "rightly marked"? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwreck

Is it 10m under LAT (low astronomic tide)? Then use seamark:wreck:depth=10 instead of wreck:depth=10m.

You're missing seamark:type=wreck to see it in OpenSeaMap.
https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=18&lat=45.03120&lon=14.16058
trial (2023-05-08 20:52:09+00:00): And you mean historic, not history.
PT-53 (2022-07-03 10:33:39+00:00): Hallo sargafl,
Du hast diesen Weg 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944422426/history
neu eingezeichnet. Gibt es den wirklich?
Als ich im Sept. letzten Jahres dort dieses Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8743791217/history
besichtigt und dazu diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39934975/history
gegangen bin, konnte ich da keinen weiteren Weg erkennen.

Hast Du den Weg abgelaufen?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
literan (2022-05-08 10:48:56+00:00): откат
Herman Lee (2022-05-11 13:32:49+00:00): 您好，您这个编辑中的opening_hours这个tag似乎存在问题。
literan (2022-05-08 10:48:32+00:00): откат
zstadler (2022-06-25 08:51:41+00:00): Hello MichaelTrach133

Please avoid entering personal information to OSM, such as the description "May 7, 2022"
literan (2022-05-08 10:47:48+00:00): кривая правка, откат. Не надо бездумно править
tarkaljamale76 (2022-05-07 11:08:10+00:00): انا اعمل مسؤول لنظم المعلومات الجغرافية الصحية في صحة ميسان وانا المسؤول عن المواقع واعرفها جميعا وانا مستعد لاي استفسار او سؤال ❔
tkk (2022-05-07 06:21:15+00:00): Zdravim, opravdu byl na miste rozcestnik odstranen? Pokud ano, byla zrusena i zelena turisticka znacka?

Diky
tkk (2022-05-07 06:21:41+00:00): viz. https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/fody/?id=6959
Minimalis (2022-05-07 11:19:47+00:00): Zdar, je to tak. Původně byl rozcestník na sloupu el. vedení, od r. 2019 je tam místo sloupu památník. Zelená turistická zůstala nedotčena.
MD
eggie (2022-05-06 18:55:39+00:00): Je vraagt feedback vvad..
Dat stuk weg waar je Hankweg hebt verwijderd lijkt me meer een highway=track.. Voor landbouwgebruik. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120634546

Gr eggie
Lejun (2022-05-09 09:13:54+00:00): Спасибо !
Lejun (2022-05-09 09:15:16+00:00): *Милосердя 🙇
user_5359 (2022-05-08 07:05:16+00:00): Hallo! Kleiner Hinweis: service_times (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:service_times) ist für religiöse Veranstaltungen reserviert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 120048890, 120049941, 120115571, 120116301, 120203516, 120203960, 120204409, 120205046, 120252237, 120257849, 120258179, 120258353, 120337290, 120341214, 120341319, 120447181, 120447497, 120447730, 120447772, 120447801, 120447953, 120450549, 120450613, 120454517, 120457617, 120469371, 120469467, 120469938, 120496086, 120496141, 120496208, 120496242, 120496281, 120496329, 120496374, 120496460, 120496496, 120497421, 120497568, 120497604, 120497724, 120497948, 120498036, 120498231, 120498384, 120511287, 120528651, 120530563, 120536477, 120539701, 120541234, 120541505, 120542056, 120542344, 120542446, 120577044, 120585467, 120620903, 120621840, 120622399, 120623158, 120623273, 120626542, 120627079, 120627225, 120627956, 120628842.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-06 18:13:12+00:00): Despite the bounding box, all the objects here were in Ukraine.  
An occasional problem with the revert scripts is that if there has been lots of editing, sometimes nodes get moved to 0,0.  These were deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120641758 and the remaining ways tidied up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120641882 .
SomeoneElse (2022-05-06 18:16:57+00:00): The user that this was a revert of was trying to get around a block discussed in more detail at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/country-based-authorizations/838/20 .
Kovoschiz (2022-05-07 09:28:32+00:00): Please discuss https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3146813
RobJN (2022-10-16 22:49:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits around Hampton Magna. A small word of caution: Please be careful when using the iD editor as it often proposes "fixes" that are wrong. For example it has a tendency to add "bridges" over streams when the reality is not a bridge but the stream running through a culvert instead. I have reviewed the edits you made and made adjustments to correct these instances.

Rob (in Warwick)
jsb0227 (2022-10-16 23:12:28+00:00): Thanks Rob, really appreciate your review and the explainer. I’ll keep that in mind in the future!
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Lejun (2022-05-09 08:17:08+00:00): Vu et validé, même si je préfère personnellement mettre les noms d’exploitant (operator) en toutes lettres quitte à indiquer l’abréviation avec un short_name:operator.

Puisque tu utilises JOSM, si tu veux encore plus de détails tu peux utiliser des relations type destination_sign[1] pour préciser toutes les directions indiquées.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:destination_sign
Lejun (2022-05-09 08:20:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution. Pas d’erreur importante si ce n’est le format utilisé pour le numéro de téléphone, on préférera « +33 5 53 59 72 72 » voire  	« +33553597272 ». Je me charge de corriger ça et de rajouter quelques détails qui me tiennent à cœur.
canfe (2022-05-08 09:18:24+00:00): Gli edifici mi sembrano davvero poco squadrati.
Alcuni sembrano anche recenti e pertanto dovrebbero essere più ortogonali.
ID ha il magico tasto Q....
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120636031
FedericoMarengo (2022-05-08 09:34:02+00:00): Ok grazie
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120636031
parsd51 (2022-05-06 21:16:38+00:00): Hej

Jeg synes det er uhensigtsmæssigt at vi retter frem og tilbage flere steder og jeg har svært ved at gennemskue dine kriterier, så jeg vil gerne høre dine kriterier for construction og efterfølgende “ikke construction” for:

- highway (f.eks. omkring den nye tertiære vej her)
- landuse (Jeg har set kommentaren “byggemodning slut” og ændret fra construction til residential, uden fysiske bygninger)

Vil du skrive dem?

Hilsen
parsd51
canfe (2022-05-08 09:19:16+00:00): Anche qui son poco ortogonali.
Davvero son così sbilenchi?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120636129
nevw (2022-05-06 19:37:04+00:00): Hi
This business is not mapped to the location listed on your website. Is the mapped location where customers should go to do business with your company? Please do not list Google maps as a source as we are not permitted to use.
nevw (2022-05-11 23:22:18+00:00): no response, removed what appears to be mapped to wrong location and different from company website.
Please re-map your business to the building you operate from.
gscholz (2022-05-07 05:11:09+00:00): Hi wakanja,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=35.37658&lat=0.32497&zoom=17

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120636381

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-05-11 04:16:25+00:00): Hi wakanja, 
these errors still exists, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
limes11 (2022-05-07 18:10:29+00:00): Hi, 

das sind eher unübliche Namen für ein Kleingartengebiet. Sind die tatsächlich vor Ort so beschildert?

VG, Limes
rarad74 (2022-05-08 07:07:20+00:00): Salut. te rog sa nu mai schimbi nume de strazi cu abrevier. Te rog citeste regulie de folosire a abrevierilor in Romania pe wikipedia. Toate numele de strazi se pun cu Strada, nu cu Str. Multumim pentru intelegere. PS: - ai grija ca pe site-urile primariilor multor sate/comune din Romania, informatiile sunt neactualizate/eronate - deci nu sunt de incredere.
andii (2022-05-08 07:15:32+00:00): Scuze, am ramas setat pe regulile de la WAZE care sunt exact invers. Le voi corecta. Referitor la informatia de pe site-ul primariei, este corecta, sunt la curent cu situatia locala.
rarad74 (2022-05-08 07:27:45+00:00): Eventual se pot face exceptii la nume foarte lungi cum ar fi Alexandru Ioan cuza unde putem abrevia din numele lui. O zi buna.
rab (2022-05-06 16:52:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057934225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053685041
what are this shapes  good for?
Jean LUQUET (2022-05-07 10:18:54+00:00): Hello, this shape I didnt create delimitate a project for water ressouces protection conduced by local authorities in Grande Plaine with help of Cartong, a french NGO specialized in mapping and data management for humanitarian activities and development. I agree it would be preferable using thé HOT tasking manager as de used to. I'll discussion this with pour haitian friends, please keep that shape inchanged, we will fix it as son as possible.
Cartographer10 (2022-05-09 18:05:07+00:00): Hey,

Ken je de tag area:highway=*? Lees onderstaande wiki maar eens wat de standaard is wanneer highway=* + area=yes wordt gebruikt en wanneer area:highway=* (area:highway=footway in dit geval). Ik zou persoonlijk die vlakken rond de trottoirs met area:highway=footway taggen. Het stationsplein is prima met highway=pedestrian + area=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
Tjuro (2022-05-12 12:23:30+00:00): Hoi,

Bedankt voor je bericht, ik heb het aangepast.
philam48 (2022-05-19 23:41:17+00:00): Hi Ed! Hope you're doing well. Just on tagging the cycle lanes as a separate way, I note on the tagging guidelines and general practice in Melbourne is to add tags to the roadway rather than as a separate highway=cycleway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_lanes_in_bidirectional_motor_car_roads Are you ok if we remove the cycleway here on this basis?
eneerhut (2022-05-20 02:21:05+00:00): Thanks for catching that Philip! Good spot. 

I have no problem with these edits being reverted on those grounds. Are you aware of a discussion somewhere on the pros and cons of adding tags to the roadway relative to mapping the cycleway separately.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-14 13:11:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Kovoschiz (2022-05-07 09:29:00+00:00): Please don't delete other features that exist. You have already moved the name.
Dimitar155 (2022-05-08 16:17:26+00:00): Hello Veidabak and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

Thank you for your contribution but please make sure to write the street names using Cyrillic letters. Let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Dimitar
Veidabak (2022-05-10 21:01:28+00:00): Hi Dimitar, 
Ok, I will.

Thanks!
Tetryk (2022-05-14 08:16:08+00:00): Witam. Restauracja Dzień i noc w Hali Mirowskiej została przez Ciebie zdublowana
ivanbranco (2022-05-11 16:44:48+00:00): Ciao nilogian,

su OSM per convenzione il linguaggio adottato per i tag è l'inglese britannico, quindi questi tag non vanno bene:

done incinta=2
scarico merci=1

puoi dargli un'occhiata?
confusedbuffalo (2022-05-06 16:55:59+00:00): Comment should read "Add data to schools in the UK using Get Information About Schools open data"
A67-A67 (2022-05-17 13:23:47+00:00): Hallo lyctkel,

Volgens mij is de Woudselaan wel toegestaan voor doorgaand fietsverkeer en geldt het bestemmingsverkeer alleen voor motorvoertuigen (of zelfs auto's en motors). In dat geval is het motor_vehicle=destination (en evt. moped=yes) in plaats van access=destination.

Ik ben hier een paar weken geleden nog door gefietst, maar weet niet meer precies welke borden er staan.
lyctkel (2022-05-17 17:53:14+00:00): Hi A67-A67,
Dank u voor het advies. Ik heb het te beperkt ingevoerd. Ik denk dat het een C12 verkeersbord is. Ik moet dit controleren.
lyctkel (2022-05-19 07:40:43+00:00): Ja, es war ein C12. Ich habe es korrigiert.
lyctkel (2022-05-19 07:59:59+00:00): Ja, het was een C12. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
A67-A67 (2022-05-21 19:07:17+00:00): Bedankt!
Langlaeufer (2022-05-12 15:53:42+00:00): Die Radwege in der Celler Straße sind separat erfasst und dürfen daher an der Straße nicht zum zweiten Mal mit cycleway=track erfasst werden. 
Mit  dem Tag cycleway:left/right/both=separate kann auf den separaten Track hingewiesen werden.
tsp15 (2022-05-08 22:25:45+00:00): To nie są żadne śluzy rowerowe.
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 07:05:33+00:00): bo?
olo81 (2022-11-30 18:00:14+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Aluza_rowerowa
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-07 13:44:34+00:00): Czemu dodałeś/dodałaś śluzę rowerową w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9715947455/history ?
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
eggie (2022-05-06 18:08:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback...   Even een tip... Gebouwen krijgen niet nogmaals een adres op de gebouwomtrek Er is al een importadresnode van het Kadaster.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-06 18:13:30+00:00): Dat vlak landuse=grass is wel degelijk gras en de slootdelen horen daar eigenlijk ingetekend te worden. 
Het is een grove import vanuit de 3dshapes en kan gewoon aangepast worden. Het is dus niet één sloot. 
Gr eggie
TomEnserink (2022-05-06 18:14:52+00:00): Beste Eggie, 

Bedankt voor je bericht. Excuses, dat wist ik niet, maar bedankt voor de tips!

Groeten,

Tom.
eggie (2022-05-06 18:20:35+00:00): Dag Tomm.. Ga je zelf aan de slag? Die slootdelen zijn smal en er zitten duikers in..
tunnel=culvert waterway=drain layer=-1
Mooi project om mee te beginnen.
Haal je nog wel de adresgegevens van de gebouwomtrekken. 
Hier zie je je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120641237
Mapse..
eggei
Mashin (2022-05-08 20:19:41+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing!
I suggest using a different aerial imagery - "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta". This will allow you to see through tree canopies and reveal that there is no lake or forest in those places that you marked.
Let me know is you need any help.
Cheers
aTarom (2022-05-21 14:32:07+00:00): Hola daniiel_, añadiste un edificio con la etiqueta "pitufo"="yes"? qué significa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057961365/history
Saludos.
Lejun (2022-05-09 08:54:10+00:00): Merci de la contribution, on est bien d’accord que le terre plein central est franchissable (highway=mini_roundabout[1]) et pas un giratoire (junction=roundabout[2]) de petite taille ?

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=mini%20roundabout
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Steampark (2022-05-09 09:03:03+00:00): Je confirme, il est franchissable.
Merci pour le suivi !
BCNorwich (2022-05-07 09:16:21+00:00): Hello, I see you are still duplicating highways and tagging them as permissive. Both of these actions are incorrect. Duplicating highways, (placing one atop another) as well as being incorrect severely disrupts proper routing. 
For the access=permissive tag on all these highways, I would ask does all traffic have to gain permission before using these highways? Or is access publicly available without seeking permission? If access is freely available then the access=permissive ought be removed.

With regard to the above comments, have you been back over your previous changesets and made appropriate regard/action on the comments there.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-05-07 09:33:35+00:00): If you could please respond to this comment perhaps we could discuss the issues mentioned above.
musman1997 (2022-05-07 11:06:59+00:00): Hi Bernard.

I am new here, and I really sorry for the late response, and yes I have seen all the neglection which is done by you, and I was really confused that how can it possible, that changes are made by their own.  So here onwards could you please guide me little more so I can fix the errors. 

Thanks, 
Kind Regards,
 Usman.
vimacs_hacks (2022-05-07 05:16:00+00:00): 我在变更集118021222加入过一个万泉庄的停靠点（节点9549598250），在天桥下面，专门停563路的，这个变更集删了没加回去。
Herman Lee (2022-05-07 05:49:22+00:00): 想问一下，这个停靠点是在什么时候设置的？
vimacs_hacks (2022-05-07 12:13:11+00:00): 不知道什么时候设的，站杆信息可以见： http://zg.tuspass.com/station.html?id=BJGJ-31-04-3-03-0001
SekeRob (2022-05-06 20:37:43+00:00): Seeing massive intersection line linkage to your 0,0, something with a note on it to not remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900
OSM Inspector sees dozens of red/orange lines emanating from the Ukraine to this point.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-06 20:52:46+00:00): Zoom in and turn the data layer on and you'll see that they have all gone!
SekeRob (2022-05-06 21:07:35+00:00): Indeed, in edit mode nothing but the buoy is there.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-07 05:30:45+00:00): Nežinau, kas čia buvo bandyta padaryti, bet tikrai negerai gavosi. Pakeitimą atšaukiau.
zluuzki (2022-05-06 18:09:48+00:00): Was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387565270 the already existing building? It has to be tagged with "building=*", otherwise it is technically not tagged as building.
afonit (2022-05-06 20:28:33+00:00): Hiausirg - thanks for pointing that out - someone changed it from a building to a greenspace, I have now changed it back to a building.
paunofu (2022-05-07 00:07:08+00:00): Buenas noches, 
¿Por qué consideras que el edificio no es un edificio comercial (building=retail) y es un edificio genérico (building=yes)?

Muchas gracias, 
Pau.