piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2019-12-26 09:50:32+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD, 
can you please take over responsibility for the errors you created and fix this?
Guido
RCA7HEAD (2019-12-26 13:39:40+00:00): que vos no veas lo caminos 
ese no es mi problema
esos caminos estan
podes agregarles que son de tierra etc
rurales, los usa la gente que vive en el lugar
muchos terminan en casa estancias etc
y y son producidos por el circular de los que viven
gscholz (2019-12-26 14:23:27+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD, 
todos esos errores (puntos rojos) que muestra el OSM inspector son creados por tu porque no conectas las formas. El software de enrutamiento no puede usar formas (caminos, carreteras) que no están conectadas.

Guido
felipeeugenio (2019-12-26 16:27:24+00:00): Estimado, por favor no borrar plazas ni agregar plazas que no existen. El mapa no se usa para jugar juegos ni apps. es para plasmar la realidad
mavl (2019-12-18 15:36:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы делаете общие точки у ручьёв и дорог. Например:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/313256816  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6194826605  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7064975049   
  
Дорога и ручей (река) имеют общую точку только тогда, когда они явно пересекаются (на местности есть брод). В остальных случаях они не пересекаются (дорога идёт по мосту, ручей протекает в трубе под дорогой) и общая точка не нужна.
gscholz (2019-12-26 09:50:10+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD,
your recent changesets have created a significant amount of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-59.39632&lat=-34.14603&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please take over responsibility for the errors you created and fix this?
Guido
RCA7HEAD (2019-12-26 13:45:18+00:00): no hay errores
no se ingles
si ves algo mal areglado
no me rompas las bolas
gscholz (2019-12-26 14:11:01+00:00): Hola RCA7HEAD, 
sus conjuntos de cambios recientes han creado una cantidad significativa de errores en la base de datos osm con respecto a formas no conectadas:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-59.39632&lat=-34.14603&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1

Cada punto rojo es un error.
¿Puedes asumir la responsabilidad de los errores que creó y corregir esto?

Guido
gscholz (2019-12-26 14:32:35+00:00): Hola RCA7HEAD, 
póngate cómodo con las herramientas de garantía de calidad:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Control_de_calidad

Guido
felipeeugenio (2019-12-25 20:01:51+00:00): Estimado.
Por favor no adosar los parques a las calles circundantes. Lo que nos está diciendo es que el parque termina en la mitad de la calle. Lo corregiremos en la semana. Saludos
Glassman (2019-12-18 01:42:11+00:00): I moved the business to a node instead of the entire building. I'm guessing it's a nutrition shop and tagged it as one. If that's not correct please correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78549578
Polarbear (2020-05-15 19:48:46+00:00): Du hast hier die L 77n nicht verbessert, sondern falsche Verläufe eingearbeitet.

Auf keinem der angegebenen Luftbildern ist die neue Strasse auch nur ansatzweise erkennbar, also ist deine Quellenangabe vorsätzlich falsch. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719380755/history wurde von einem Kollegen am 14.12.2019 als eröffnet gekennzeichnet (opening_date=2019-12-13, siehe auch https://www.stadtblatt-online.de/verkehr/freie-fahrt-biomalzspange-eroeffnet/), am 18.12. setzt du es wieder auf 'construction', ohne eine Begründung zu geben.

Von dir in die L77n eingefügte Nodes, z.B. 7064985694,  entsprechen nicht dem realen Verlauf und schneiden die Strasse von angrenzenden Grundstücken ab.

Daraus abgeleitete Änderungen an landuse-Flächen sind daher ebenso falsch. 

Was ist die wirkliche Quelle deiner Änderungen?

Auch hier löschst du unnötig Objekte, um sie ähnlich wieder neu zu zeichnen. Soll das die Spuren verwischen?
eserte (2019-12-18 19:40:06+00:00): Sollte der alt_name nicht entfernt werden?
j1scad (2019-12-21 18:02:08+00:00): alt_name entfernt
Danke
WoodWoseWulf (2019-12-18 09:32:33+00:00): How is all of this a nature reserve?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
It has a school right in the middle of it?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-12-18 09:30:50+00:00): What makes this a recreation ground?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground
"An open green space for general recreation, which often includes formal or informal pitches, nets and so on."
eggie (2020-01-03 13:57:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-03 13:59:48+00:00): Dag Eric,
Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen. 
Ook zijn je edits niet te controleren.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-03 14:06:44+00:00): reverted by changeset  #79158828

Je edits zijn teruggezet. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart. geen edits wereldwijd. beperk je tot een straat en sla dan op. dan pas verplaatsen naar een nieuwe locatie.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
gscholz (2019-12-22 11:57:53+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD,
your recent changesets have created a significant amount of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-59.06116&lat=-34.22495&zoom=9&overlays=islands,islands_car,islands_bicycle,islands_all,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-04 23:40:55+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10428668 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
monesto (2019-12-20 14:36:21+00:00): La RN7 entre Luján y el final de la circunvalción a SA de Giles debe ser demarcada como autopista. No tiene cruces a nivel.
gscholz (2019-12-22 11:57:57+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD,
your recent changesets have created a significant amount of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-59.06116&lat=-34.22495&zoom=9&overlays=islands,islands_car,islands_bicycle,islands_all,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Supaplex (2019-12-18 06:13:21+00:00): 不好意思，公園還沒有落成啟用，仍在施工狀況
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78557590
Kovoschiz (2019-12-18 09:12:52+00:00): Ngau Tam Mei village and Yau Tam Mei village, et al, are part of the Ngau Tam Mei valley area. You should be renaming this, not deleting it outright
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78559281
eggie (2019-12-18 06:51:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Een adres toevoegen aan de "buildingshape" is niet correct. De vermelding middels adresnodes zijn al aanwezig.
Het toegevoegde adres is verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-18 06:35:27+00:00): Hi,

this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149721735

is definitely one-way only.

Source: I'm a local.
bhav_ana (2019-12-19 10:44:28+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust your doing good. 
Removed onetag to roundabout segment (way 149721735), as OSM wiki guidelines states oneway=yes is implied and redundant for junction=roundabout 

[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout]

Thanks,
bhav_ana
chnav (2019-12-18 08:14:58+00:00): Междворовые проезды это service
Arun Madhavan (2019-12-19 12:47:58+00:00): Looks reasonable. Expecting more contribution :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78562838
user_5359 (2019-12-18 19:14:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2019-12-19 05:51:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please have a look on the sequence of the housenumber on https://www.osm.org/way/35790286
Arun Madhavan (2019-12-19 12:49:18+00:00): Hope to see more contribution. i shaped the building a bit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78563706
BCNorwich (2019-12-18 09:52:21+00:00): Hi, I removed the power pole from the drain putting it on the power line.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-18 09:30:24+00:00): Please don't tag for renderer.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78564301
Matt McCutchen (2022-11-14 17:16:01+00:00): Hi!  On what basis did you decide that this segment is better described as highway=service than highway=path?  Routers will send motor vehicles along a way with highway=service, but I was just at the location and I'm convinced that this way is not intended for motor vehicle traffic.  For one thing, it's too narrow; it looks basically like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281335860 except that there are no gates at the ends.  So I propose to change the tag back to highway=service.  I'll notify osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com too as instructed on your user page, and if I don't get a response on this changeset in a week (by November 21), I'll go ahead and make the change.  Thanks for your attention!
utkap (2022-11-15 14:50:29+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset 128946253. Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
utkap
mueschel (2019-12-21 18:39:21+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what "Interdit poids lourds" exactly means? This tag doesn't exist.
Maybe something like this could work:
access:conditional = no @ "poids lourds"
RenaudRautsch (2019-12-21 19:05:18+00:00): Bonjour Mueschel, 
Les véhicules de plus de 1,5 tonnes sont interdit dans la "Rue de l'Usine".
RenaudRautsch (2019-12-21 19:07:08+00:00): Hello Mueschel,
Vehicles over 1.5 tonnes are prohibited in the "Rue de l'Usine".
mueschel (2019-12-21 19:07:17+00:00): This way is tagged as a 50cm wide footpath in a tunnel. Is that really correct?

If yes, the proper tag would be 
maxweight = 1.5
RenaudRautsch (2019-12-21 19:13:02+00:00): Yes,
You can activate this tag. Thank you.
RenaudRautsch (2019-12-21 19:13:32+00:00): maxweight = 1.5
InfosReseaux (2020-10-16 17:44:57+00:00): Bonjour

Merci d'avoir utilisé name=* pour les noms, c'est bien l'usage prévu.
Est-ce que ces postes sont également munis d'une référence avec des chiffres dans cette zone ?
Si jamais il est possible d'utiliser la clé ref:FR:gdo pour l'indiquer depuis le terrain

Bonne soirée
François
Sigo (2020-10-21 04:29:42+00:00): Bonjour François,
Malheureusement non, il n'y a que le nom d'inscrit. J'ai constaté que seuls les nouveaux postes créés par Enedis possèdent un numéro gdo.
user_5359 (2019-12-19 05:46:26+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/10429639
Frans S (2020-01-04 13:15:09+00:00): Hello Mar Mar
I review work of mappers and have  few remarks on your work
This is a disaster project. All we want you to map are buildings and highways. No landuse features. Sorry to say, but you waste your time to map those objects.. These have to be mapped outside these projects.
A highway, track tagged by you, never connect settlements and houses.  A better tag is 'residential' within villages or 'unclassified.
Please review the wiki about that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africas
Mar Mar (2020-01-07 13:27:28+00:00): Hi Frans, first of ll thanks for your feedback. I am aware that you don't request landuse features in this task but I chose to do so as it is not wasted time for me. You might not need it for this specific project but I believe it is good to have the data available in OSM anyway. Regarding the track/residential highway I take note and will be more careful in the future, taking into consideration the link you have provided.
Frans S (2020-01-08 09:19:03+00:00): Hi Mar Mar. Thanks for your reaction
about landuse features.
We have no problem when landuse features are mapped.
As a result of dividing an area into tasks, the landscape is divided into small pieces. Your work only shows the little piece you are mapping. A forest, farmland, etc. often cover larger parts. So it is customary to do this outside of a HOTOSM project in OSM with iDeditor or JOSM
kind regards
KrzysztZ (2020-05-27 11:40:25+00:00): Witam,
mam uwagi do numerów budynków w Woli Zarczyckiej, które naniosłeś tą zmianą. We wszystkich było użyte addr:street = Wola Zarczycka; żadne źródło nic nie mówi o nazwach ulic w tej miejscowości ani o tym że ulica ma taką nazwę jak miejscowość. Usunąłem nazwę miejscowości z addr:street i umieściłem w addr:city i addr:place. Budynek 424e wg SIP Gminy Nowa Sarzyna to jest nowy budynek obok tego, gdzie naniosłeś ten numer - przeniosłem
M!dgard (2020-01-08 18:57:25+00:00): Hoi

Je hebt een "fixme vóór uploaden" laten staan: https://osm.org/way/756455891

Gelieve bij te werken
Jose Luis Infante (2019-12-18 10:49:39+00:00): Hola,

gracias por tu contribución.

Respecto a las restricciones de giro sobre la misma vía (giro de 180 grados) no es necesario añadirlas, ya que es igualmente incorrecto en cualquier otro punto de la vía. Es decir, no tiene sentido poner esa restricción en cada cruce o cada punto de una vía.

Pero si existe una señal que indique expresamente que no se puede realizar ese giro (porque la morfología del cruce puede dar a entender que se puede realizar) entonces si que se puede poner.

Un saludo!
andy-gi (2019-12-18 11:11:22+00:00): Ok, vengo de editar con Waze y alli si se marca como prohibido los giros en U. lo tendre en cuenta.
Geim (2019-12-18 21:01:45+00:00): Mag je hier niet gewoon de hele dag op de fiets komen?  (onderbord uitgezonderd fietsers en bromfietsers).
https://goo.gl/maps/QJHdsq1mmLTWSiaSA
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-19 02:57:27+00:00): Aangepast.
skfd (2019-12-18 10:31:11+00:00): привет! кажись это скорее waste_disposal, а waste_basket
Jakka (2019-12-18 09:16:27+00:00): Votre ajouts des "man_made=tower" je ne ne les vois pas sur image PICC ?
eggie (2019-12-18 12:16:27+00:00): Dag Jasper... Zou je highway=residential weer weghalen daar. Nog sterker. Die ameniy=parking is helemaal geen parkeerterrein(en)  en kunnen dus ook weg.
Parkeerstroken tag je in de highway met 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
Voorbeelden parking:lane:both=parallel: both on the left and right hand side parallel parking is possible.
parking:lane:right=perpendicular: on the right hand side you can park perpendicularly.
parking:lane:both=marked: there are only some parking spaces available that are individually marked.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
Marych_ (2021-01-15 13:06:23+00:00): Hi Oltrarno

What you user for this alignment?
We have a GPS track & your alignment didn't fit to track.
Please check again.
cartorhythm (2021-01-19 18:34:12+00:00): Hi Marych, Oltrarno is no longer active so I will respond for them. I’ve aligned the road with reference to the GPS tracks. Thanks for bringing this up.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-12-30 11:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79010906 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some garbage in NE England such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7055704897/history .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3353 for context.
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-10 18:31:52+00:00): باسلام
جناب Saeed SJ@
هدف از اصلاحات فقط ظاهر و زیبایی نقشه نیست.
ثبت اصلاحات شما ایراداتی دارد که به شرح زیر است:
تنها از خیابان مهندس عطایی می توان به خیابان شهید حاتمی وارد شد و تنها راه خروجی از خیابان حاتمی نیز فقط از خیابان شهید عطایی به سمت جانبازان است.
دقت بفرمایید
Saeed SJ (2020-01-13 07:28:55+00:00): با سلام
دوست عزیز اصلاحاتی که ما انجام می دهیم صرفا بر اساس گزارشات کاربران است. ما چند گزارش از کاربران دریافت کردیم که جدیدا تمامی مسیرهای این تقاطع باز شده است و اصلاح  بر این اساس صورت گرفته است. اگر همچنان محدودیت ها وجود دارد حق با شماست و ادیت شما صحیح است.
ممنون از شما
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-18 08:45:19+00:00): سلام
باسپاس از تلاش شما برای ویرایش و به‌سازی نقشه
بنده از تصاویر mapillary نیز برای نمایش وضعیت خیابان ها استفاده می کنم.
# پیشنهاد: اگر برای کاربرانی که گزارش ارسال می کنند امکان ارسال تصویر از مکان (مانند اپ mapillary) ایجاد شود، ویرایشگران ثبت راحتتری خواهند داشت.
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-22 11:48:23+00:00): سلام
Saeed SJ@ گرامی
از تقاطع شهید حاتمی، تصاویر mapillary گرفتم و تقریبا به شکلی هست که شما ثبت کرده بودید. این تغییر جدیدا اتفاق افتاده و بنده از شما عذرخوهی میکنم.
Saeed SJ (2020-01-25 04:29:28+00:00): خواهش میکنم ممنون از توجه و دقت شما
مطمئنا نقشه با مشارکت و همفکری همه کاربران کامل میشه.
کاربران ما در حال حاضر امکان ارسال تصویر هم دارند و گزارش های خوبی میدن.
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-25 13:49:58+00:00): بسیار عالی
موفق باشید
SomeoneElse (2019-12-24 21:07:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've changed the name here from Burns Avenue South to Jack Underwood Way, but according to the local council data it's still called Burns Avenue South:
https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=131094
Have you got any evidence (photos, that sort of thing) that could indicate that the new name is correct?  Otherwise, it does look a bit suspicious...
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-12-24 21:09:29+00:00): ... actually, one more thing.  The changeset comment here is "fixed", but that's not really very descriptive - it doesn't explain what you changed from and to or what the source of the change was.  It'd really help other mappers if you could include that information.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info.
Best Regards,
Andy
chnav (2019-12-19 04:02:43+00:00): Using OSM for personal bookmarks.
Fake objects reverted.
smootheFiets (2021-06-30 14:07:52+00:00): Hoi Marcel,
Ik denk dat de brievenbus niet helemaal correct zit hier (op de parkeerplaats?), ook al moet zij volgens post.nl ergens in de buurt zitten. Ik kan haar niet ontdekken vanuit mijn armchair in Groningen. Zou jij ter plaatse nog eens willen nakijken? 
Dankjewel, smootheFiets
user_8898764 (2021-06-30 23:00:20+00:00): Hallo,
Hij staat daar echt, al kon de precieze plek nog iets preciezer :)
Hij stond eerst op het Bachplein maar was verdwenen, ik weet nog dat ik er erg boos over was :)
Ik heb even op Google Streetview gekeken, maar hij staat nu echt goed. Ik wil morgen wel even langs gaan voor de zekerheid, maar weet vrijwel zeker dat het klopt zo.
In de changelog heb ik een omschrijving over de plaats gegeven, moet dat ook in de description staan, of is dat niet nodig? De commit history is minder zichtbaar en vindbaar.
smootheFiets (2021-07-01 08:28:41+00:00): Ha, geweldig, dankjewel! Nu zie ik hem ook: https://app.slagboomenpeeters.com/787f24fe-2ce1-4675-a511-bd4dc44125c8?permalink=7a3fd40090a3499e8cfc673f22efdd38  (heb je toegang tot S&P? Heel handig, zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71454 )
Op de nieuwe positie staat hij inderdaad prima. Had nooit gedacht dat zo'n oranje kastje een brievenbus zou kunnen zijn :)

Als je de omschrijving in description=* wilt zetten, kan dat volgens mij geen kwaad. Maar het hoeft ook niet echt als de coördinaten maar kloppen. Super!
user_8898764 (2021-07-01 08:43:07+00:00): Goedemorgen,
Dank je, altijd goed om wat verwarring op te helderen. De description tag is toegevoegd met de tekst als uitleg.
Fijne dag gewenst, Marcel
user_8898764 (2021-07-01 08:44:04+00:00): Oh, en ik zal eens kijken naar de S&P, dank je.
Cascafico (2019-12-18 11:00:40+00:00): sei sicuro del leisure=park? Vedo che contiene alcune abitazioni che presumo abbiano dei giardini privati.
Areknames (2019-12-19 07:38:17+00:00): Sicuro, non sono abitazioni al giorno d'oggi. Sono villette monofamiliari un tempo usate per ospitare i terremotati e che oggi vengono usate solo per una rievocazione storica, quindi al momento sono totalmente disabitate.
Polarbear (2020-03-20 14:24:09+00:00): Welche Funktion hat das von dir angebrachte layer=10 ? Bzw. die vorherigen Experimente mit =1 und =2 ?
Auch ist der Brunnen wohl kein natürliches Gewässer, warum daher natural=water?
eggie (2019-12-18 11:39:11+00:00): Editor iD is berucht om onbedoelde verschuivingen te veroorzaken als je schuift met de kaart in editmodus.
De Braak 2b is ergens anders terecht gekomen. Kijk je nog even?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78576550
Een winkel als de HEMA hoort op de adresnode bijgetagd te worden. De bedrijfsnaam is niet de naam van het gebouw.
Zet je de info over naar de juiste adresnode?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-18 11:40:23+00:00): 2b vind je terug op de Markt
Alhamdulillah (2019-12-31 12:27:52+00:00): And something in China?
KingofBin (2020-01-09 21:00:59+00:00): Yes, thank you for bringing that up. Changed the function of a building I visited
GilB (2020-01-05 17:56:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas l’intérêt et la raison de ce point. Cela ne correspond pas à la réalité du terrain. J'ai supprimé les tags qui me paraissaient inadaptés mais laissé le point.
Cordialement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-01-06 08:24:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre message.
C'était une histoire de géolocalisation pour que ces informations soient référencées sur Qwant.
Cordialement,
GilB (2020-01-06 19:13:57+00:00): Je comprends mieux la raison mais cela me parait particulièrement inadapté pour des données OpenStreetMap. La carte n'a pas à être utilisée de manière détournée pour influencer un moteur de recherche. Ce type de contribution est à éviter et dénature le travail des autres contributeurs.
Cordialement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-01-07 07:39:33+00:00): Nous comprenons bien votre point de vu
Nous avons oublié de préciser que cela allait alimenter la cartographie de Qwant Maps. et en aucun cas, nous allons dénaturer le travail des autres contributeurs . Par ailleurs,Osm a un partenariat avec Qwant d'ou nos Maj quotidienne. Dans le but de progresser afin d'améliorer les données sur Osm, pouvez vous nous dire comment auriez vous procéder de votre côté pour optimiser ce node? Voir de faire un way?
Merci d'avance
Rom1 (2020-01-07 11:18:59+00:00): Bonjour, voici ma proposition https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7066146685
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-01-07 13:00:15+00:00): Merci Romain.
Par contre, nous référençons plutôt une zone commerciale qui s'appelle Prairie au Duc
GilB (2020-01-07 20:05:35+00:00): S'il s'agit d'une zone commerciale ce serait plutôt landuse=retail qu'il faudrait utiliser sur un polygone mais cela ne parait pas adapté à cette endroit compte tenu de l'usage majoritairement résidentiel des bâtiments.
=> voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dretail 

C'est sur la liste Talk-fr qui faudrait exposer le problème pour pouvoir en discuter avec la communauté des contributeurs français.
=> voir https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Cordialement,
Rom1 (2020-01-07 20:52:47+00:00): Ou sur la liste nantaise http://listes.openstreetmap.fr/wws/arc/local-nantes/
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-01-08 07:56:23+00:00): Merci à vous 2 pour les réponses.
Rom1 (2020-01-08 08:29:53+00:00): Ou encore mieux, solliciter directement https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Carto'Cité pour une expertise locale.