piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-11 20:12:29+00:00): Bonjour, est_ce que vous pourriez ne pas  supprimer les accentuations sur les majuscules nom de voies lors de l'ajout des relations associatedStreet. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#Noms_de_voies

Exemples des modification dans  ce changeset :
"Impasse des Églantiers" devenu "Impasse des Eglantiers"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304379392/history

"Montée de l'Église" est devenu "Montée de l'Eglise"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190509907/history

Merci
Bonne carto!
omérindol (2023-05-12 06:42:42+00:00): Bonjour,
La suppression de certains accents en majuscule est pour coller au mieux à la réalité de la dénomination des voies dans la Base Adresse de la commune et constaté également sur les panneaux sur le terrain. L'objectif étant la même dénomination avec les mêmes caractères pour les recherches et les traitements des données.
Mais je comprends que cela soit moins... "beau" ?

Bonne carto à vous aussi !
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-12 07:07:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Le rapprochement FANTOIR/BANO ne tient pas compte des accents donc je ne vois pas pourquoi les supprimer ?
Cf le wiki que j'avais joint.
Bien Cordialement,
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-12 07:24:05+00:00): Je vais poser la question dans le forum pour avoir l'avis de la communauté sur ce point.
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-12 07:29:02+00:00): En fait pas besoin, voir ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes

"Accents

Les accents et autres signes doivent toujours être notés, aussi bien sur les majuscules que sur les minuscules : Île de Ré, l'Épanne, l'Étang de Cergy, Canton de Würtele, Rue de l'Évêque. "
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-12 07:41:25+00:00): Et pour compléter par rapport au terrain, voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#Noms_de_voies


Règles d'écriture : en général, il faut mettre en majuscule la première lettre de tous les noms propres et communs, mais pas les articles. Exemple : "Rue de la Gare". Ne pas utiliser d'abréviations même si les plaques de rue en comportent ou si le nom est trop petit pour s'afficher sur la carte. Les logiciels de rendu ou de routage se chargent d'effectuer des abréviations si c'est nécessaire. Les abréviations peuvent prêter à confusion, par exemple "St" peut vouloir dire "Saint" en français, mais "Street" en anglais. Ne pas mettre toutes les lettres en capitales (majuscules), même si la plaque est écrite ainsi. Les chiffres s'écrivent comme sur la plaque de rue, c'est à dire en chiffre pour les dates, mais aussi en lettres pour les quantités: "Place des Vingt-Quatre Comtés", "Rue du 23 Novembre". Les signes de ponctuation et les accents doivent aussi être portés, même s'ils manquent parfois sur les plaques de rues : ex. "Rue Saint-Benoît"
RaccoonFederation (2022-09-27 15:12:28+00:00): Tom Cruise would give it a go
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
karson_ (2022-10-10 03:50:33+00:00): Not sure if you care, but your API keys for Strava are displayed verbatim in your changeset.
arichnad (2022-10-14 13:26:30+00:00): Thanks for the note!  Yes, I had noticed that.

It is ok because those API keys expire every few days.  The ones you see there are already expired.  If someone wanted to use my api key it wouldn't get them very far.  Maybe one day I'll figure out how to configure iD to not return that information.

Thanks again for the message.  -arichnad
arichnad (2022-10-14 13:28:16+00:00): Oh, it's also truncated, hah.
adrianojbr (2022-09-27 19:02:36+00:00): Olá, jalbaka! Tudo certo?

Não há necessidade de criar restrição de retorno de uma via para ela mesma como nesse caso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14630544, conforme se depreende da documentação do OSM: "A no_u_turn restriction relation is primarily useful if the Role from and Role to members are distinct ways" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Road_signs).
jalbaka (2022-10-18 01:54:30+00:00): Olá! Corrigi o erro. Agradeço.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-27 22:31:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
elot360 (2023-01-01 21:16:32+00:00): Cześć, pamiętasz może skąd wziąłeś informację o utworzeniu LK784? Nie ma takiej linii w wykazie dla roku 2022, znalazłem ją dopiero w 2023. Pytam z ciekawości czy istnieje jakieś lepsze źródło dla takich zmian
Anas masuris (2023-01-01 21:20:43+00:00): W wykazie lipcowym (11.07) oraz grudniowym z 2022 roku już widniała
Anas masuris (2023-01-01 21:21:22+00:00): I mówię tu o Id-12
elot360 (2023-01-01 22:10:52+00:00): Dziękuję uprzejmie za wskazówki!
Human1each (2022-10-04 19:38:26+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
NorthCrab (2022-12-22 12:34:18+00:00): "Nie wiem co pisać w opisie zmian"
prawdę i tylko prawdę
RicoElectrico (2022-12-23 13:52:51+00:00): Z opisu powinno wynikać co zostało zmienione (by było wiadomo jakie zmiany są pomyłką) oraz dlaczego (czy czegoś brakowało na mapie, a może się coś w terenie zmieniło).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
orthocircular (2022-09-27 16:07:35+00:00): Hey there thanks for your contributions! FYI parking aisles are confusing tags. They should only be used for the minor gridlike rows of parking spots in a large lot and not for the main ways in/out/around the lot. Basically you should be able to get to the front door of where you need to go using only service roads.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126704153
nero mosca (2023-01-08 09:50:09+00:00): Ciao, la Cascata della Tufara non è quella indicata in località Ponte del Fascio ma una cascata naturale che si trova sul Torrente Tufara che si trova più a monte ed è un affluente di sinistra orografica del Torrente Scorzella. Per evitare ambiguità, sarebbe opportuno correggere indicando la cascata in questione col nome di Cascata del Fascio.
lamacchiacosta (2023-01-09 09:52:22+00:00): Ciao, sentiti libero di correggere, se hai informazioni maggiori. Quando ci sono stato non c'erano informazioni.
Grazie.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-28 13:30:05+00:00): Hi,

This turn relation (and the other one you did), are both invalid and won't show up in routers. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Prohibitory_restriction
Both of these relations are missing the `from` member
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 13:58:56+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128778493
SHARCRASH (2022-09-28 10:07:13+00:00): Hey great adding! But are all these still visible with any obvious material? 

I remember this historic you added www.openstreetmap.org/node/7294622906/history but there is a pitch according 2021 aerial photos. So either it's not exactly there or it has been surveyed by archaeologists, nothing has been left and the pitch has been built. Then it would be better to lifecycle it with razed:historic=... like i did with this site which was excavated but only the field is left www.openstreetmap.org/node/9373665029
Otherwise if tourists arrive on terrain and they don't see anything, it will be a real deception. 
Extra info/tags/description is always welcome.
wilda69 (2022-09-28 20:12:09+00:00): Good point; will correct these shortly. The Kayl one is still visible
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-27 16:45:07+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. Viskas gerai, tik vietoj description=parduotuvė pridėjau shop=convenience - dabar tai bus parduotuvė :-)
Baloo Uriza (2022-09-28 03:17:23+00:00): E0560 sounds like the more likely name...probably should be ref=CR E0560 since it's presumably 56 miles south of the Kansas border and not 560.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126704809
MaryiaKuklis1111 (2022-09-28 14:39:56+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza! Thank you for your comment! This edit was made based on a comment from Mapbox Contribute customer: "The road name is E 5600 Rd not E0560 Rd." If you have any other (more accurate) information about the name of this street, you can make an edit. Have a nice day!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126704809
Frans S (2022-10-01 09:32:36+00:00): Hello. 
No need to map a few traces here as highway= residential. Track should be sufficient.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126704845
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-27 17:26:29+00:00): Ne, man_made=pier čia kaip tik ir gerai, nes tai nėra prie kelių tinklo prijungtas daiktas, todėl highay=* žyma sukeltų maršrutizavimo tikrinimo problemų.
Vaidotas (2022-09-27 17:35:21+00:00): Supratau. Gal būtų naudinga note pridėti, nes keistokai atrodo prieplauka uždėta ant upės :)
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-27 17:42:33+00:00): Na taip, bet tiltas irgi keistokai atrodo ir į duomenų topologiją niekaip neįsipaišo :-)
Frans S (2022-10-01 09:35:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not always  accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126705035
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:10:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10056578674/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
ma-rt-in (2022-09-29 11:48:40+00:00): Hallo,

kleie Nachfrage: Warum löschst du nan Node 1371521857 das direction? Falsch ist es ja nicht.

vg
9ix (2022-09-30 16:17:54+00:00): Hey,

Die Richtung ist bei einer Einbahnstraße vorgegeben, daher eine redundante Information, die nicht zuletzt wegen möglicher Widersprüche vermieden werden sollte.

Grüße
ChillyDL (2022-09-27 21:37:18+00:00): Hallo Team_Saturo,
hast du eine Quelle für den Namen "Hünengrab Sievershagen"? Ich kann dazu im Web nichts finden, außer nicht unbedingt quellentauglichen Komoot-Einträgen.
Team Saturo (2022-10-22 15:12:23+00:00): Auf den Grabhügel weisen Wegweiser vor Ort hin. Quellen sind schwer zu finden.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220307104326/http://www.dietrichpeters.de/

"Die Walder zwischen Schwienhagen, Manhagen und Sievershagen sind von einer großen Zahl von Menschen bewohnt. Grabhügel im Wald und Urnenfelder weisen darauf hin. 2 Erhebungen von überpflügten Gräbern gegenüber dem Hünengrab weisen auch auf die vielen Menschen hin, die hier lebten."
Vinber (2023-01-21 17:13:29+00:00): salut, tu as juste passé opening_hours en closed mais j'ai l'impression que la poste a fermé totalement non vu la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3522238

On supprime ?
GeorgeKaplan (2023-08-05 16:43:36+00:00): Le passage en closed date du changeset précédent. Dans tous les cas, la poste n'a plus de bureau ici, je supprime.
Marival (2023-08-06 09:27:26+00:00): Bien, merci !
user_5359 (2022-09-28 17:46:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tags
Acres = 2549.85
District = Nashik
Households = 260
Name = Kanlad
Nearest village = Yeola
Pin number = 422305
Place = Village
Population = 2328
State = Maharashtra
Taluka = Nipha?
orthocircular (2022-09-27 20:56:42+00:00): Thanks for your fixes! I've made some further tweaks in changeset 126713932. I like using osmcha to view changes, it might be useful for you: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126713932/

I've left judgment calls like way 1098323697 and 828423084 as you mapped them just to not impose my viewpoint on everything, but I would personally map them as service roads as well. (Yes they're technically only accessed for parking in a lot, but it'd be real easy for them to be used just to get in and out of the business/lot.) As you can see I've modified ways 1098323700 and 1098323695: it's going to be hard to get in/out/around these businesses/lots without using those routes; many "parking aisles" serve a dual purpose of getting people in/out/around the lot and we call those service roads in OSM's funky syntax. Way 852641139 hardly has any parking spaces, it's very much used for getting to/from the business. Way 181513335 is only really a driveway for the parts that loop around the backside, but even then it's totally fine to leave it as a service road. Don't be afraid of just leaving every unnamed place where cars go as service roads, there's nothing wrong with that.

We don't really need to subdivide sections of asphalt down to the foot as to what's what: the main goal here is to allow maps to look good (renderers can choose which parts to show in order to balance visual clutter) and to route GPS apps appropriately (some basic apps may choose to ignore parking aisle routing entirely, or at least reduce their routing priority, to produce more sane routing more quickly.)

Here's the wiki page on parking aisles for your reference. Again don't worry, I redid parking lots about a dozen times before I figured out what the standard was. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle#Disambiguation
PT-53 (2022-09-28 07:18:46+00:00): Hallo Jürri,
Du hast bei diesem Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/734683848/history
das Merkmal
- traffic_sign=city_limit
gelöscht, das Merkmal
- name=boos
aber  belassen. Das paßt so nicht zusammen.
Grüße
Jürri (2022-09-28 07:48:43+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

das Merkmal name=boos habe ich entfernt...Danke für Deine Hilfe!!!

Liebe Grüße
Jürri
RobertH-PUM (2022-09-30 19:42:05+00:00): A3-A8 junction is wrong. 
Why add surface to a proposed road. Why add smoothness to a non existing road?
4KK (2022-09-30 20:07:11+00:00): What makes you think a highway built in 2030 or possibly later with even more evolved techology than today would have a gravel surface??
RobertH-PUM (2022-09-30 21:44:00+00:00): There were plenty of times when a motorway in Romania was abandoned during construction with just gravel or even with the base made of dirt. 
You can't know how things evolve and it's a mistake to set like it already has asphalt. There are trials in Romania to use cement for heavy traffic motorways. 
Smoothness is even worse. Even a brand new motorway could not have good asphalt and needs to be redone under traffic.
Jrachi (2022-09-28 20:11:33+00:00): Fai più attenzione a ridisegnare le way la prossima volta!
Hai rotto sei relazioni!
Anche quella ciofeca di iD dovrebbe averti avvisato del problema che stavi generando.
StefanoAimar (2022-09-28 20:24:34+00:00): cavolo scusa.. pensavo che ricreando la strada le relazioni si reinserissero automaticamente.. forse la cosa più intelligente sarebbe stato semplicemente modificare il nome della strada?...
Jrachi (2022-09-28 20:46:30+00:00): Avendo cancellato la way si sono perse tutte le informazioni che conteneva.
Se dovevi cambiare solo un tag non era proprio necessario cancellare e ridisegnare.
Fai attenzione a quello che è contenuto (i tag ed i loro valori) ed alle appartenenze.
Visto che sei alle prime armi dovresti fare più attenzione agli avvisi dell'editor e nel dubbio chiedi a chi è più esperto.
Se sei di Torino è stato aperto da poco un canale Telegram. Se hai un cellulare è un ottimo posto dove chiedere aiuto.
Jrachi (2022-09-28 20:47:20+00:00): https://t.me/OSM_TO
StefanoAimar (2022-09-28 20:51:54+00:00): ti ringrazio.. ho chiesto la revisione delle modifiche proprio per evitare di lasciarmi indietro degli errori.
Claudius Henrichs (2022-09-29 08:23:15+00:00): Hi Joseph,
People Mover systems have been tagged as "rubber tyred monorails" for quite some time now, see "Type of monorail" here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monorail#Type_of_Monorail
I think there's potential to introduce a new tagging scheme just for people movers separate of monorails, but while that doesn't exist I would stick with that also for Morgantown PRT.
Tagging the infrastructure as bus guideways like you did seems wrong since:
- There are no buses riding the Morgantown PRT
- There are no exit/entry sections to move from normal highway sections to a "bus guideway section"
- The viaduct sections of the track look and work much more like monorail girder sections
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway

I would therefor suggest to restore the rubber tyred monorail tagging here in Morgantown.
What do you think?
Joseph R P (2022-09-30 05:19:16+00:00): I think that bus guideway tagging still makes more sense than monorail, even if the latter is used more widely and if the bus guideway is slightly incorrect. Though the viaducts appear as monorail tracks from certain perspectives, these tracks are not rails but rather a system of guideways for small people-mover cabs built on truck chassis, almost forming a freeway-like system, whereas a monorail is a cab/train along a single rail and is not car-like. Truthfully there are no buses riding along this system (however the autonomous cabs somewhat resemble small buses), but there also are no monorail trains riding along it either.

Even though it doesn't fully fit the definition of a bus guideway, I think it's much closer to that than a monorail which is usually a train. If there are any other systems like this in the US, I definitely think those should also be tagged as bus guideways. Just my opinion, though.
clay_c (2023-04-07 18:44:59+00:00): The Morgantown PRT is not a guided busway. A regular bus with special guideway equipment should be able to traverse highway=bus_guideway. This fixed-guideway transit system doesn't support street vehicles.

While the Morgantown PRT isn't really a monorail, we use "monorail" on OSM as a de facto catch-all for any unusual urban or small-scale fixed-guideway transit systems. As Claudius mentioned above, this system was previously tagged as a monorail, and perhaps in the future we could devise a better tagging scheme for people movers, but right now "monorail" is the best we've got.

Could you please revert this to rubber-tired monorail tagging?
Joseph R P (2023-04-07 19:21:22+00:00): Would you be open to starting a discussion about this over the tagging channel on the OSM US Slack? I'm still inclined to have this be tagged as a bus guideway over monorail for many reasons, and would like to find out if others agree to see if similar systems in the country should be shifted over to this tagging scheme (however, I am not aware of any other guideway systems in the US and this could be the only one).
Nakaner (2022-09-28 09:17:06+00:00): Hallo,

start_date=* wird von den allerwenigsten Anwendungen ausgewertet, insbesondere, weil es ein Tag ist, das die Bedeutung des Haupt-Tags umkehrt. Richtig wäre, statt shop=chemist constructoin:shop=chemist zu verwenden.

Übrigens, Datumsangaben schreibt man in OSM in folgendem Format: YYYY-MM-DD

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126707985
Benoît C MdP (2022-09-28 09:55:03+00:00): Bonjour aadvan,

Je n'ai pas compris pourquoi tu as indiqué ce qu'est une piste cyclable (précédemment bande cyclable) alors qu'à ma connaissance, c'est toujours une bande. Serait ce une erreur ?

Bonne continuattion

Benoît
martianfreeloader (2022-10-16 16:25:29+00:00): There is a note which disagrees with the opening hours you tagged on the parking. Do you have an idea who is correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3349203

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974837171
itineris (2022-10-16 16:32:35+00:00): I am. :)
I took a photo.

There is a table with the working hours (06:00-21:00). And there is another table forbidding *caravans* between 07:00 and 21:00.
martianfreeloader (2022-10-16 16:38:08+00:00): Great, thanks :-)
EllieNyaa (2022-10-03 06:06:12+00:00): Why did you change a lot of highway=cycleway to highway=path here? For example way 986773526.
pkoby (2022-10-03 13:00:56+00:00): My tagging techniques are evolving throughout this project I'm working on. I have no longer intentionally been retagging cycleways that already have foot tags for shared-use paths, but some around here got changed by accident. I will review this changeset and revert those changes.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:10:47+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
marc__marc (2023-03-19 23:05:50+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098350701
que veux-dire l'absence du tag rail sur ce troncon ? il n'y a plus de rail sur la largeur de la route ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Virtho (2023-03-21 03:24:48+00:00): Bonjour
Les rails ont été démonté sur le passage à niveau entre Nobleville et Moirville (juste sur la route)
Le passage à niveau n existe plus la route a été goudroné
Dodko (2022-09-28 07:24:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3637947557/history
je to správne, že reštaurácia má názov Textilná galantéria?
Jose Riha (2024-02-20 10:39:22+00:00): tiež ma to zaujalo. ale používateľ už nie je aktívny.
luin132 (2022-09-27 18:24:22+00:00): I also adjusted secondary and tertiary roads.
rhtb0 (2022-10-02 11:34:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
animebirder (2022-10-03 13:03:33+00:00): This was an error and should have been two separate changesets.
animebirder (2022-10-03 13:05:06+00:00): (これはエラーで、2 つの異なるセットの変更であるはずでした。)
ivanbranco (2023-04-22 22:10:24+00:00): Hi Arnold,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098353389/history

was this supposed to be place=hamlet?
eggie (2022-09-28 06:37:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
haukep (2022-09-29 13:58:46+00:00): Danke für die Prüfung vor Ort. Aktuell ist der Weg noch als "access=private" eingezeichnet. Ich verstehe dich so, dass das geändert werden müsste. Handelt es sich um einen "offiziellen" Weg (also access=yes)? Oder gilt "access=permit"?
HaulingHGV (2022-09-29 17:32:54+00:00): Hallo haukep. Danke fuer deine Anmerkung. Der Weg, um den es sich dreht, darf ohne Genehmigung betreten werden, also access=yes.
Der Weg fuehrt an der Grenze des Standortuebungsplatzes entlang und wird rege benutzt. Die beiden parallel stehenden, in N/S Richtung ausgerichtet, sind Putenstallungen, an deren Grundstuecksgrenze der Weg zum Teil entlang fuehrt. Da ich recht neu bei OSM bin, habe um review meiner Aenderung gebeten, damit eine andere Person eventuell korrigieren kann. Gruss
adiatmad (2022-09-30 06:22:14+00:00): HI rafsanraj06, maybe you want to add house/building name instead of the address?

For example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1066696851), (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/14287117), (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171605705)

Happy mapping!