piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
3vivekb (2017-11-07 17:42:01+00:00): I didn't mean turn lanes I meant intersecting ways.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 18:25:21+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53587653
access=yes  eraf halen. Dat hoort er niet. motor_vehicle=no verwijderen. op path en cycleway zal nooit een auto rijden per default.
Die brandgangen gewoon al die accesstags verwijderen. Om te voorkomen dat ze nog gaan routeren kun je ze op access=private zetten. 
Hier de default access tags voor Nederland. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Doe je het zelf?
eggie (2017-11-07 18:54:22+00:00): Van dat largo pad en overige paden heb ik de onnodige tags nog verwijderd. Geen access tags yes of no erop.
De parallelvoetpaden heb ik ook nog ontdaan van access no en foot yes.
In de wiki kaarteigenschappen staat omschreven welke tags er op moeten.
Wanneer je het hokje aanvinkt bij opslaan kun je kiezen dat ervaren medemappers met je meekijken. Anders ziet echt niemand het. 
Elk begin is moeilijk. :)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
M!dgard (2018-01-24 11:38:10+00:00): Ik weet niet waar je thin_rollers vandaan haalt maar de aanvaarde tag is smoothness=excellent, zoals die er stond voor deze changeset. Als je dat wil veranderen, zal je daar geloof ik een Proposal voor moeten maken in de wiki.

Raadpleeg de wiki om tags te ontdekken, want alleen daar kan je zien wat een tag nu echt betekent. Ook data consumers gebruiken de wiki om te zien wat ze gaan ondersteunen.

Ga nooit zomaar voort op wat iD voorstelt, de developers kijken alleen naar "hoeveel keer komt dit voort in de database".
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-24 12:51:49+00:00): Thin_rollers is voorgesteld op de talk-page van key:smoothness; omdat 'excellent' nogal subjectief is.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Accepted_features/Smoothness

Anyway, ik heb het aangepast
M!dgard (2018-01-24 13:01:11+00:00): Voor nieuwe dingen is dat nu geen probleem, maar bestaande tags aanpassen is wat anders. Ik vind thin_rollers ook wel beter eigenlijk, maar als je het verandert dan wordt het nergens meer herkend …

Een taggingmanier aanpassen is vrij lastig. Er moet een manier zijn om te dual-taggen, anders is er coördinatie nodig, en dat hebben we niet in OSM.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-07 19:12:22+00:00): Mary, bem vinda ao OpenStreetMap e obrigado pelas contribuições.
É algum tipo de aula que vocês estão tendo?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-08 05:34:19+00:00): Hi, "Untitled Path" is not a proper name. The name is the name only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
.
If you don't know the name, simply don't add one. If the road has no name, use noname=yes.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-08 17:47:19+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53611724
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-07 19:13:05+00:00): Geovane, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap e obrigado pelas contribuições.
É algum tipo de aula que vocês estão tendo?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-07 19:13:19+00:00): Pedro, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap e obrigado pelas contribuições.
É algum tipo de aula que vocês estão tendo?
jaap de vries (2017-12-07 12:46:13+00:00): Beste Paul, je hebt een weg aangepast dat door een voetval veld heen ligt. Dat is een beetje raar, pas je eea aan?
Jaap
eggie (2017-12-07 13:32:35+00:00): Paul.. log in via www.openstretmap.org  
Het commentaar heeft hier  te maken met HOT OSM.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-08 05:15:00+00:00): Hi, if I'm understanding this correctly, it seems your copied alt_name:fi to name:fi in Palestine relation (1703814). This removed the word "Palestine" from name:fi, and replaced it with (Israeli Arab Territories?).
.
First, this is factually wrong, Israeli Arabs actually reside within Israel and are 20% of the Israel population. Israeli Arabs and Palestinians are not the same population.
.
Second, this may upset some people and is a recipe for edit wars and I would suggest you keep the original meaning. Relation 1703814 should be called "Palestine" or "Palestinian Territories" or some variation of that, while relation 1473946 is Israel. So I would suggest renaming name:fi to "Palestiinan valtion" or "Palestiina".
.
Thanks!
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-16 06:45:11+00:00): Partially reverted due to lack of response: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53830720
naoliv (2017-11-07 19:10:02+00:00): Rodolfo, é algum tipo de aula que vocês estão tendo?
Rodolfo Paraíso (2017-11-09 00:15:56+00:00): Boa noite,
Isto é um trabalho que está sendo realizado pelos alunos da universidade federal de Uberlândia do curso de engenharia de agrimensura e Cartográfica. Será delimitado todos os lotes e edificações da cidade de monte Carmelo, para em seguida ir refinando a descrição das informações dos vetores.
naoliv (2017-11-09 00:46:42+00:00): Oi, Rodolfo. Obrigado pela resposta.
Vocês saberiam dizer se os lotes são residenciais, comerciais, industriais ou de algum outro tipo?
Pergunto isso porque, da forma que estão representados, fica como se todo o terreno na verdade fosse um prédio.
Por exemplo, aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538083454
A definição de "lote" no OpenStreetMap utiliza outros valores (place=plot) e também acaba não sendo visível neste mapa padrão.
Classificar a área como residencial, por outro lado, deixaria a área mais correto (como aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538799904) e também visível.
Vocês (tanto os alunos quanto o professor) têm interesse em conversar com o resto da comunidade para verificarmos uma maneira melhor para representar os dados que vocês desejam inserir no mapa? Creio que dê para todos se beneficiarem com isso: vocês poderão inserir dados com uma representação mais correta, tirar dúvidas e aprender novos conceitos, e o projeto também ganhará novos objetos para que outros usuários utilizem.
Se quiser pode me mandar uma mensagem direta, responder por aqui mesmo ou entrar em contato através de algum canal da comunidade brasileira https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Abraço!
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
maxerickson (2017-11-09 03:13:48+00:00): Hi-

You have added fixme="It is not appreciated road in the images" to a few ways I have just edited. There are many roads that do not appear in the imagery from the US TIGER import (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER). It's fine to delete them, especially if you check the layer in JOSM "PR/USVI 2017 NOAA Hurricane Maria imagery", but most roads should be visible in the ESRI Imagery.

The NOAA Maria imagery can be a pain, it is split into many layers. the file at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aOnThem8Df5mqdwI-RhSQWujyLM_SygO has outlines of the area each layer covers.

Thanks,

Max
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 20:12:20+00:00): Probeer de tandarts op de adresnode bij te taggen.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 20:16:11+00:00): foot=yes kan er af. footway=sidewalk moet er af. Het is geen sidewalk.
Officieel is iets een footway als er het blauwe bord wandelpad staat. in bijna alle andere gevallen is het gewoon path.
Over brandgangen is nog steeds geen consensus. De vraag is zelfs of we die wel moeten taggen.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:51:23+00:00): Hi monya, you've moved a bus stop slightly. Can you confirm this new location is more accurate? The older position was from the Ministry of Transportation GTFS files.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 20:19:53+00:00): Wanneer er een school is dan op de adresnode taggen amenity=school... name=... 
Je kunt ook het schoolterrein een vlak geven en daar amenity=school taggen met de naam. Scholen zijn lastig, want waar laat je het adres?
Zie ook draadje op forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57278
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majkaz (2017-11-07 23:13:19+00:00): Ich bitte diese Anderung zuruckzusetzen.

Nur ein winziges Teil aufs Neue zu andern macht kein Sinn. Dabei ist es gleich auch falsch, da es sich hier nicht um kein Halteplatz handelt,sondern um die Bussteige-Positionen.

Bitte keine automatische Korrekturen.
fell3 (2017-11-07 23:58:30+00:00): Habs gemacht.
Was sind automatische korrekturen??
Ich trage alles mit Josm ein.
Im Programm Josm steht geschrieben, dass (Tag:highway=bus_stop) veraltet ist und nicht mehr genutzt werden soll. So in der Art habe ich es auch in der OSM Wiki gelesen.
majkaz (2017-11-08 10:00:49+00:00): Was Du im JOSM beschreibt ist in diesem Fall eindeutig ein mechanisches Edit.
Nur weil sich JOSM beschwert, sind Korrekturen ohne zu verstehen von Zusammenhängen zu meiden. Lasse einfach von solchen Änderungen die Finger weg, es macht mehr Probleme als es hilft.
fell3 (2017-11-08 11:07:07+00:00): Ich habs ja begriffen, ihr könnt die Hexenjagt beenden und beschwehrt euch lieber bei den Machern von Josm, damit diese ihre  Angaben für Bushaltestellen im Programm durchschaubarer machen.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-21 17:54:40+00:00): "Use highway=trunk for high performance or high importance roads that don't meet the requirement for motorway."

Yeah, that actually looks like trunk is the correct tag for this segment, not primary.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
BCNorwich (2017-11-08 07:05:05+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I must point out to you that data on GoogleMaps is copyright material. It is therefore not allowed for it to be copied to OSM.
I have removed that name which I am sure was added inadvertently.
Please see this page (near the bottom, OSM statement on copyright) :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
Regards Bernard
ei8fdb (2017-11-08 09:48:26+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Ah, sorry. Wasn't aware (though I suppose I should have been). 

I can re-add the description later. I eyeballed the street but there was no street sign. 

Thanks,
Bernard
Polarbear (2018-07-23 18:17:11+00:00): Die CS des Jahres 2017 wurden revertiert, da sie (fast?) nur Fiktionen und Privates enthielten. 
#60993218 #60993639 #60994143 #60995246
mavl (2018-12-25 20:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
szalona_entropia (2017-11-08 10:35:34+00:00): Przebieg DK78 i DK88 został zmieniony blisko rok temu.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 20:07:00+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

De info zal ik even samenvoegen met de reeds bestaande adresnode.
eggie (2017-11-07 20:10:51+00:00): merged info with address node
BCNorwich (2017-11-08 07:28:01+00:00): Hi, you need to add maxspeed=?? 
Your tag does not state the speed limit just the type of limit.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-11-08 07:29:19+00:00): I meant to mention that StreetComplete may not be clear on speed limit adding.
ei8fdb (2017-11-08 09:00:22+00:00): Hi BN,

Hmm, I don't remember adding the speed limit as "??". 
From memory the steps I made were:
Click on speed limit icon
Used "other answer" option
Chose "no speed limit" or no speed limit sign
Answered yes to "are you sure"
Answered no to a question about if the lanes of the carriageway were physically separated. 

There is no speed limit I can see on Globe Road. I cycled it last night and at 2 separate points Street Complete asked me for the speed. 

Is it possible Street maps "mapped" my no speed limit answer (from the UI) to "??"?

I cycle that street regularly and can not remember seeing a sign. 

What would you like to do? I won't be going passed there til Sunday/Monday at earliest.
BCNorwich (2017-11-08 11:42:18+00:00): Hi, I thought from your changeset comment of "Add speed limits" that you were trying to add a speed limit. 
It seems then that StreetComplete adds a default tag of "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" when "no speed limit" is chosen. 
Anyway there's no harm done. 
Regards