piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 05:42:27+00:00): Looking at the NSW Government's base map, they don't have data for a road here, but as it's visible on aerial imagery, this is why it was only added 9 months ago by another contributor to OSM. 

The way OpenStreetMaps works is we maintain a public and open data set for other providers, like navigation/GPS systems providers, can use. For example; TomTom will take data from OSM at intervals and combine it with their own data, as well as other sources, merge it all together and that's their product. This is how internet-connected systems work, but it's possible that non-internet connected systems don't get updated automatically (you'd have to plug it into your computer to update it), and as such can have data from many many years ago. Most sources take their data from OpenStreetMaps because it's free for them to do, but it's up to each individual company to keep their own data up to date with OSM, which they don't always do, so it truly depends on the company who makes the GPS unit, but in the case of the road data in OSM, I found no reason why an up to date GPS wouldn't have been able to find your house from the data that currently exists in OSM.

The other main provider of maps data is ESRI, which is often a preferred source of data for Government use, which may have been used by the ambos, etc.

Having a look at the ESRI map, your road is not listed and could be the reason for the problem. You can take a look here: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html

If you sign up for an account you might be able to contribute to the map or report a problem, but I can't see any way to do this without being logged in.

I'm also sorry to hear about your medical emergency, I hope you're alright. I can only imagine the stress caused by the failure of a nav system to find your house in an emergency.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 05:46:16+00:00): Edit link here: https://communitymaps.arcgis.com/home/
LucyCee (2022-03-28 06:09:24+00:00): Thank you. I am ok. It was a visitor to our property who had the problem and she is ok now too. 

I have just had a look at Apple Maps and on there the service road is labeled as Wyoming Ave so no one will be able to find us using that app either because that’s not the name of our street.  I’m so confused by all this. 

The explanation of the Ambos etc not having an up to date GPS system makes sense to some degree but of all services I’d have thought emergency services would need an accurate navigation system.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 06:13:48+00:00): I completely agree, but in our internet-connected 21st-century society, everything is still so disconnected and everyone has their own data that they prefer to use. So it's difficult. If the ambos are actually using 100% government data, you might want to contact the NSW Department of Spatial Services to have the service road added to the base map, which ESRI and others sometimes pull from as an additional data source. You might want to also request an update on Apple Maps, which should be relatively easy to do in the app.
LucyCee (2022-03-28 07:26:51+00:00): This is what Council said when I requested they help me make sure these properties were accessible for emergency services: 

"Regarding the mapping, as you would be aware, there are countless companies that provide image data for different mapping systems. There is no one centralised system that updates every map. Unfortunately, due to this, Council is unable to act any further on this part of your request. Apologies for any inconvenience."

Perhaps I need to inform them of the existence of NSW Dept of Spatial Services.  I'm annoyed because this is something they should know about and be able to fix without twelve years worth of requests.

I think I'll be putting in a request to formally name this part of the Hwy and I notice that it is the local council that does that:

"Under the Roads Act 1993 the council of a local government area and the Roads and Maritime Service (RMS) are the road naming authorities. The Geographical Names Board (GNB), under the authority of the Surveyor-General, is a relevant party and must be notified of any new road names. 

"Members of the community that have queries related to road names should contact their local government council for further information."
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 07:35:47+00:00): Yup, this is ultimately the council's jurisdiction and they provide road/footpath GIS to the Dept., but the council's reception probably wouldn't have known of the existence of this department as it's fairly new and not well-known, nor are they asked about it often I'd imagine. They should've put you in touch with whoever manages GIS at the council though. I'd recommend getting in contact with the Dept of Spatial Services first and they'll most likely follow up with the council to get the data added -- but even then it can take years for providers to update their own data with it so don't hold your breath.
LucyCee (2022-03-28 07:41:56+00:00): I have been emailing the Engineering Officer, Civil Assets and the Operations Engineer.  these are people who really should know how to solve  this problem without me having to find help from you online, for which I am very grateful.  I've also contacted the local State member and TfNSW.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 07:43:05+00:00): Truly not a problem, happy to help. I hope you're able to get this fixed 👍🏻
alester (2022-03-31 19:02:36+00:00): You accidentally changed all of Haro Strait into a beach, so I've reverted that. I'm not sure where the actual South Beach is, so you'll have to make that edit.
PacNWMike (2022-04-01 23:46:42+00:00): Thanks alester. South Beach is on the south side of San Juan Island looking out to the strait of Juan de Fuca. However Haro Strait is shown offshore. I'm not sure how to define the extent of Haro Strait which is more to the northwest.
MxxCon (2022-03-28 04:07:34+00:00): What is the previous location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119001229
MxxCon (2022-03-28 05:10:09+00:00): "crossing=marked" is for crosswalks with stop sign. crosswalks with traffic lights are "crossing=traffic_signals"
akadouri (2022-03-28 13:54:24+00:00): I have updated the ones I could confirm. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=610035984

I have no doubt made this mistake many times in the past, I could have sworn there was a way to notate both the paint status and traffic control status...
MxxCon (2022-03-28 15:11:51+00:00): I'd imagine you could list both with ";", but wouldn't "traffic_signal" imply that it's marked? Other than temporary after repaving, are there any traffic light crosswalks without stripes?
akadouri (2022-03-28 20:44:58+00:00): Here is one in Flushing, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936536474

It is pretty uncommon, a few of the other one my query flagged were improperly tagged.

It looks like there were some proposals like this one to separate the marked/unmarked tags and signal control but it doesn't look like they ever got officially approved. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing:signals
MxxCon (2022-03-28 21:24:21+00:00): Is that intersection actually pedestrian signal but permanently no markings? Looking at Bing satellite it looks like much darker asphalt, so perhaps just brand new pavement but didn't get around to putting down crosswalk paint? Bing streetview imagery shows very worn-out crosswalk paint, but it's from 2014. https://streets.planning.nyc.gov has imagery every 2 years dating back to 2001 and even 1996 and this intersection's configuration didn't change since.
akadouri (2022-03-28 21:37:00+00:00): I'm not sure, I guess it could have been painted since the last re-pavement. It doesn't seem like it's common enough around here to worry about having to tag both cases. 

I guess I'll slowly re-tag `crossing=marked` as `crossing=traffic_signals` as I come by them since that does seem to be the right tag despite so much of the city being `crossing=marked`
MxxCon (2022-03-28 05:13:12+00:00): As far as I remember, that pedestrian pathway's surface is just asphalt and not cement slabs as typical sidewalks.
akadouri (2022-03-28 13:37:03+00:00): I split this way, so it copied whatever tags were on it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610035979
Sawan Shariar (2022-03-29 07:09:11+00:00): Those are not ponds, it is aquaculture. Please follow the osm standard tagging system.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119002332
Sawan Shariar (2022-03-29 07:12:30+00:00): Those are not ponds. Please follow OSM Standard Tagging System
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119002332
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_10241830 (2022-03-28 19:39:37+00:00): Hallo,

der Tannenkopfweg ist jetzt eine riesige Brücke quer über Schwanheim. War das beabsichtigt?
kaltuna (2022-03-29 04:46:20+00:00): Hallo, nein das war ein Fehler. Vielen Dank für's aufmerksam machen. Ich habe das korrigiert.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-03-30 14:22:23+00:00): Hello! Please notice the language code will add with a colon not with a minus.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:50:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
MxxCon (2022-03-28 17:13:15+00:00): So what exactly did you map here? Atrium?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119004182
Rishu1992 (2022-03-29 05:44:42+00:00): It's the entrance lobby.
user_5359 (2022-03-28 06:54:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117906672, 117906677, 117906683, 117906687, 117906694, 117906699, 117906708, 117906717, 117906728, 117906732, 117906734, 117906743, 117906749, 117906754, 117906759, 117906766, 117906769, 117906772, 117906778, 117906783, 117906789, 117906797, 117906809, 117906818.
map per (2023-04-15 12:40:15+00:00): Hallo heilbron,

hier (1) gibt es keinen separaten Radweg, sondern eine Radspur. Warum hast du zwei mal mein cycleway:right=lane durch cycleway:right=separate ersetzt?

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55461530/history
map per (2023-04-27 05:47:08+00:00): Kommen meine Nachrichten eigentlich bei dir an? Sieht so aus als hättest du in den Letzten Jahren auf keine Nachricht mehr geantwortet. Schreib doch bitte wenn du das hier ließt.
heilbron (2023-06-03 20:54:58+00:00): Hallo
Erste Nachricht hatte ich allerdings nicht gesehen. Und das Tagging hat ich als Antwort auf eine StreetComplete Frage gemacht...
heilbron (2023-06-03 21:20:10+00:00): separate heisst ja eigentlich m.E. auch, dass er separat eingezeichnet ist.
map per (2023-06-05 06:34:31+00:00): Hier ist kein Radweg separat eingezeichnet, Radler fahren auf einem Schutzstreifen auf der Fahrbahn. Nur der Fußweg ist einzeln eingezeichnet.
aceman444 (2024-10-15 21:51:31+00:00): Zdravim, co je ten objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9612268155 ?
Mirecnet (2024-10-16 15:54:33+00:00): Neviem, bol som tam uz davno. Vyzera to, ako ruina starej upravne vody. Bol som tam v zime a nemal som cas to skumat :) Nabuduce prekumam.
Mirecnet (2024-10-16 16:07:23+00:00): Trochu som to tam popupravoval. Vyzera to skor na meraciu stanicu  hladiny potoka Mlynica.
aceman444 (2024-10-18 00:00:35+00:00): No, takze ani hranicny kamen, ani vodovod? Meracia stanica sa teda znaci inak.
aceman444 (2024-10-22 23:14:23+00:00): Co ste vyriesili zmenou znacky 'name' na 'description', ked ste stale ponechali, ze "Vodovod", pritom tvrdite, ze to "vodovod" nie je. A uz vobec nie hranicny kamen.
nickvet419 (2022-03-28 06:17:01+00:00): Reverted edits as areas and correct information contained within them were completely removed and redrawn.
nickvet419 (2022-03-28 07:13:45+00:00): I had just mapped out these features the other day using multiple types of imagery and public data for the most accurate and uptodate info.
Frans S (2022-04-04 11:33:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A few remarks
Please solve the issues mentioned on the error triangle in IDeditor before uploading.
Please tag highways in according to their purpose. You tag paths as unclassified highways, 
Check the wiki how to tag highways 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa.
Look also to the width of a trace to decide how to tag it 
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2022-03-28 09:44:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you mean opening_hours (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours) or service_times (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times)?
mavl (2022-03-29 14:52:48+00:00): Лыжные трассы:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:piste:type  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Piste_Maps
julcnx (2022-03-29 15:53:26+00:00): reported and reverted for geometry vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119005470
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-31 15:53:13+00:00): يا هلا بك وجزاك الله خير على مبادرتك في تحسين الخريطة، كما أن الشعبان لو كان عليها الوسم intermittent=yes لكان أفضل
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-31 15:54:14+00:00): وهذا الوسم يدل على أن الشعيب متقطع أي أنه لا يجري به الماء طوال السنة وهذا حال معظم الشعبان عندنا.
blincoln (2022-04-07 09:46:26+00:00): A duration of 0:00 does not make routing happy. I will submit a change to fix this
user_12733236 (2022-03-28 06:55:53+00:00): منبع عکس های حاوی اطلاعات جئو هستند که در حال حرکت ظبط شده اند
Source is based on geo-coded images recorded on the move plus survey
amadvance (2022-03-30 15:35:42+00:00): Ciao morsi,

Mi sa che hai fatto una correzione di geometria che ha peggiorato la precisione ad Opreno.

Guarda questa immagine della situazione attuale:
https://ibb.co/VBxqKnj

La colorazione di fondo è la mappa StravaHeatmap, e come si vede chiaramente la   mappatura è fuori dalle tracce GPS. Dovrebbe essere sostanzialmente dentro la striscia gialla più chiara.

Per fare correzioni di geometria è fondamentale usare questa mappa, che è l'unica affidabile. Le aeorofoto, o la singla traccia GPS sono spesso sbagliate.

Un altra cosa. Il punto di isolated_dwelling Pradasella era messo dentro l'edificio principale intenzionalmente, come è indicato nella documentazione: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling

Se vuoi sistemo io.

Ciao,
Andrea
morsi (2022-03-31 13:27:07+00:00): scusa ma non sapevo della mappa di Strava. Ho provato a caricarla su JOSM ma mi da solo tasselli molto grandi. come poso fare a ridurli?

Correggi pure tu se ho fatto degli errori.

Grazie
amadvance (2022-03-31 21:59:57+00:00): Per usare questa mappa, ti serve un account strava. Anche quello gratuito va bene. Trovi qui le informazioni per creare il link: https://nuxx.net/blog/2020/05/24/high-resolution-strava-global-heatmap-in-josm/

E' un processo manuale un po' ostico, ma ci sono estensioni per i browser Firefox e Chrome che semplificano il processo. Le trovi qui: https://github.com/zekefarwell/josm-strava-heatmap

Ciao,
Andrea
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117906672, 117906677, 117906683, 117906687, 117906694, 117906699, 117906708, 117906717, 117906728, 117906732, 117906734, 117906743, 117906749, 117906754, 117906759, 117906766, 117906769, 117906772, 117906778, 117906783, 117906789, 117906797, 117906809, 117906818.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-28 08:25:39+00:00): Hello again indiasc,

Please do square right-angle buildings after drawing with the "q" key, and do zoom in a bit more first.
Also please do include some actual words, not just hashtags, in your changeset comments. 

Best Regards,
Andy
PS: As I mentioned mefore, any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
indiasc (2022-03-28 23:56:43+00:00): Hi, Andy what would you suggest i say ?
SomeoneElse (2022-03-29 15:14:32+00:00): Hello indiasc,
Try saying a bit about what you're doing.  If you're adding buildings from aerial imagery, then say that (people update OpenStreetMap in lots of ways, including from local survey).  Your "imagery_used" says "Bing aerial imagery;.gpx data file" so that might suggest that you did a local survey - if you did, say that too.
Best Regards,
Andy
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 08:30:01+00:00): 1. `allotments=plot` is for the land assigned to one individual.
2. `=sanitary_dump_station` is for dumping toilet waste directly.
whb (2024-01-20 13:04:53+00:00): Guten Tag,

die Änderung von highway=residential in highway=living_street kann ich anhand der angegebenen Quelle (KartaView 08.05.2021) nicht nachvollziehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83421200/history
Auf den Fotos endet der verkehrsberuhigte Bereich hier (Schild links im Bild):
https://kartaview.org/details/3581549/52/track-info
und beginnt dann hier wieder (Schild rechts im Bild):
https://kartaview.org/details/3581549/60/track-info
So wie das auch zuvor erfasst war.

Viele Grüße
whb
changchun_1 (2024-01-21 12:45:48+00:00): Hi whb,
jop das Schild hab ich wohl übersehen und habe gedacht, so ein kurzes Stück residential kann nicht sein. Habe die aktuelle Lage jetzt angepasst. 
Gruß Matthias
user_5359 (2022-03-30 09:34:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/2454822213. What is the reason to have two vk and website information on the same node?

By the way: deleting and re-inserting is not very welcomed in OSM. And smaller areas should be perfectly possible during an import.
hanchao (2022-03-31 08:25:59+00:00): 为啥删除体育场等数据，修改已回退https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119147904
dpolovinkin (2023-10-15 19:53:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, заметил что вы год назад поменяли много магазинов в ЦУМЕ тэгами с Bosco которые вообще не относятся к этим магазинам, что некорректно. В чем был смысл вашего апдейта?

Jaeger-LeCoultre, Dior Institut, Max Mara, Pomellato - просто одни из примеров никак не связанных с Bosco, что это если не вандализм?)

@literan, посмотри это тоже плиз?
kate_rocketdata (2023-10-16 07:45:06+00:00): Добрый день!
Данные точки были созданы на карте, исходя из информации от клиента, полученной год назад.
Группа компаний Bosco открывает и управляет магазинами не только собственно Bosco, но и других брендов- https://prnt.sc/dXcQ41wRAfBR
Также вышеуказанные Вами магазины представлены на сайте клиента.
dpolovinkin (2023-10-16 08:12:22+00:00): ссылка нерабочая(
и к слову о нерабочих ссылках, у вас все ссылки в магазинах сторонних в ГУМе где стоит брэнд Bosco, хотя там он не продается, аля https://boscofamily.ru/magaziny-monomarki/isaia.html ничего не открывают.

И если магазин продает часы или одежду только определенного брэнда, который не Bosco, тэг brand тут кажется что совсем не подходит, может быть будет подходить https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:operator ? если управление идет от Bosco, но брэнд который там продается совсем другой

скинете плз ссылки где именно отдельные магазины типо Longines и Jaeger-LeCoultre указаны на сайте Bosco?
kate_rocketdata (2023-10-16 08:51:54+00:00): В опубликованных нами точках на создание тэг бренд Bosko не указан.
Бренд просто объединяет импорт. 
Прикрепляю ссылки на магазины 
Longines - https://www.bosco.ru/brands/longines/
Jaeger-LeCoultre - https://www.bosco.ru/brands/jaeger-lecoultre/
Strubbl (2022-03-28 17:37:19+00:00): Hi helpy, 
der von dir neu eingetragene Pfad hat eine Breit von 0 Metern. Existiert der damit überhaupt? Oder ist der wenigstens ein paar cm breit?

Vielleicht möchtest du auch die Sichtbarkeit von dem Pfad ausdrücken? Dazu gäbe es den Tag trail_visibility: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:trail_visibility

Viele Grüße
Dimacn (2022-03-29 06:11:37+00:00): А можно не делать дубли? 1 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9612451513   2 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9612450992
kate_rocketdata (2022-03-30 09:17:45+00:00): Добрый день! Это не дубли, информация с официального сайта https://barnaul.mts.ru/personal/podderzhka/zoni-obsluzhivaniya/offices/S356
Dimitar155 (2023-03-30 05:48:37+00:00): Hello Kate,

Why is it needed to have both shop=mobile_phone and office=telecommunication? shop=mobile_phone is obvious, office=telecommunication is used for the offices of a telecommunication company (where the general public is usually not supposed to). shop=telecommunication would be the correct tag to use for the shops (where you can pay your bill, sign a contract, get a new device etc.).

Best wishes,
Dimitar
martinst (2022-03-28 19:15:03+00:00): Hallo Pauloner,
in OSM wird die Wirklichkeit abgebildet und keine existierenden Wege gelöscht.
Wenn die Darstellung der Pfade auf einer Karte "irritiert" wende dich bitte an den Ersteller derjeweiligen Karte.
Revertiert in Changeset 119036214.
enemenebene (2022-03-28 13:03:51+00:00): Hallo redrace,

dopellt sich die Änderung mit meiner vielleicht?
Ich schlage vor den Weg in der Eigenchaft unverändert, aber als zerstört zu taggen, also "destroyed:highway=track".

Viele Grüße
enemenebene
redrace (2022-03-28 14:04:32+00:00): Huhu
Ich bin da gestern drüber gelaufen. Für mich ist das jetzt ein Pfad. 
OK ich hätte das  für die Lifetimegeschichte als "destroyed" drin lassen sollen. Mein Fehler. Aber ein Pfad ist da auf jeden Fall 
Gruß Meik
Marek-M (2023-12-08 12:18:39+00:00): Cześć, ten fragment drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172033399 ma pozostawiony tag 'construction' i nie wygląda to na prawidłowe. Czy możesz to zweryfikować?
StephaneP (2022-03-31 09:43:20+00:00): Salut,

Attention, lorsque tu transformes une ligne d'arbre en haie, ça n'a plus la même signification. On peut traverser une ligne d'arbre, mais pas une haie, qui est une barrière.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-04-21 17:15:05+00:00): highway=pedestrian areas near tv tower ovelap. I don't think that "indoors" area should be tagged as highway=pedestrian
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 08:34:24+00:00): 1. `=townhall` is not for a "hall". 
2. `information=office` is for tourist info for the entire place.
Larmax (2022-03-30 06:34:36+00:00): Hei, name=* tägissä tulisi olla vain yksi nimi ja kankaanradanaukio on muutenkin jo kartalla pisteenä. Kartalle tulisi vain lisätä kohde kerran.

Hi, the name=tag should only include one name and kankaanradanaukioseems to be on the map anyway. There should only be one OSM object per one real life feature.
DD1GJ (2022-03-28 19:33:48+00:00): Teilrevert wg verschobener Landnutzung durch unsachgemäße Änderungen. Mapper direkt kontaktiert.
wolfbert (2023-05-16 12:54:33+00:00): Adding layer=1 to service highways is pointless. I've removed it.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117906672, 117906677, 117906683, 117906687, 117906694, 117906699, 117906708, 117906717, 117906728, 117906732, 117906734, 117906743, 117906749, 117906754, 117906759, 117906766, 117906769, 117906772, 117906778, 117906783, 117906789, 117906797, 117906809, 117906818.