piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AgusQui (2017-03-28 21:42:54+00:00): Esta bien mapeada, tiene la forma real, la cantidad de carriles, el tipo de superficie, semaforos, restricciones de giro, buses, restricciones condicioneles de sentido (según día y horario), incluso las sendas peatonales cercanas tienen el tipo de rampa para descender del cordón ¿vos que decis que le falta?, para mí lo único que hay que mejorar es el monumento.
lferreyra (2017-04-02 07:01:26+00:00): Esta bien, lo dejo a criterio tuyo, nuevamente no voy a cartografiar.
Habia dejado las formas mas redondeadas , y las veredas bien posicionadas, inclusive el mismo monumento, visualmente como esta se lo ve desprolijo, es lo que puedo remarcar.
AgusQui (2017-04-03 03:55:59+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo que el monumento hay que mejorarlo, pero como no me interesa mucho el mapeo de edificios, paso ja.
Respecto a dejar el trazado de la rotonda mas redondeado, no se puede debido a que no es una rotonda convencional, modificar las entradas y salidas para que se vea mejor afectaría el ruteo (las indicaciones y el itinerario).
Y lo de las veredas bien posicionadas, recuerda que las imagenes satelitales pueden estar corridas, hay que moverlas antes de mapear, en este caso yo las acomode basandome en Strava que por esta zona tiene trazas GPX abundantes. Si vas a mejorar algo por esta zona alinea las imagenes a lo que ya esta dibujado antes de mapear.
Nakaner-repair (2017-03-07 01:42:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46546997, 46548976, 46618856, 46628028.
mweper (2017-03-07 11:42:01+00:00): Hola EMMTR 227. Tuve que revertir tu edición porque está mal mapeado el recorrido de la línea K, ya que se hacen con relaciones y no con vías (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina/Transporte_público). Además, el recorrido ya se encuentra mapeado como relación (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Rosario/Transporte_Público#Trolebuses).
--
Cualquier duda o problema que tengas o haya en el mapa, puedes contactarme o dejar un informe de problema (nota) en el mapa.
--
Si te animás a corregir el recorrido en la relación, ten mucho cuidado ya que se podría romper muchas otras cosas.
--
Saludos.-@mweper
Mistsmitt (2019-08-28 10:59:44+00:00): Кажется не хорошо отразилось получилось
michalfabik (2017-03-13 22:13:21+00:00): Pozdrav Milenko, da li možete upisati više podataka o kampu? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
kartler175 (2017-03-17 22:21:47+00:00): Boundaries are virtual lines with no dimensions, highways are real physical objects with specific properties and at least two-dimensional. They are not boundary elements, but as as a whole within an area defined by a boundary. So please map boundaries as separate objects.
ma-rt-in (2017-03-07 21:31:55+00:00): Hallo Bitte lies dir das nächste mal das OSM-Wiki durch zum erstellen von Geschäften.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-20 15:26:22+00:00): Hi bermiego, amenity=hotel is wrong, please use tourism=hotel. Thanks, Alex
bermiego (2017-03-20 18:22:47+00:00): It's done, Alex.
Thanks.
Stereo (2017-03-07 12:28:13+00:00): Je ne savais pas que les couches du cadastre marchaient aussi avec Vespucci! Ça fonctionne bien?
Dagou (2017-03-12 18:01:26+00:00): Oui, en fait c'est par l'intermédiaire de geoportail apparemment.
praeteritum (2024-01-10 12:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146102547.
mariotomo (2020-03-15 19:47:23+00:00): hola.  seguramente ya no te acuerdas, pero esta tienda está abierta … cuando?  de 05:00 a 05:00 ???
Hjart (2017-03-07 11:04:55+00:00): Stige Pizza var i forvejen angivet (40 m mod syd), så jeg har slettet din version og flyttet den gamle lidt.
Hjart (2017-03-07 11:08:05+00:00): Iøvrigt velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag
aceman444 (2020-11-10 12:39:08+00:00): Zdravim, ak ma hotel parkovisko, treba ho zakreslit na spravne miesto so znackou amenity=parking. Pridanie building_1=parking na hotel je neplatna znacka a nema ziadny efekt. Dakujem.
OKANO Takayoshi (2017-03-07 03:29:38+00:00): すみません。編集の意図を教えていただけますか。元のタグづけを見ると、松屋国領店と飲料自販機を一つのノードとして描いているようにも見えますし、もしそうだとしたら編集後のタグづけも不適切なので。
kei murabayashi (2017-03-07 08:17:51+00:00): タグの中に飲料自販機が含まれていることに気づいていませんでした。名称が松屋で、アイコンが無印のものであったためファーストフードのものに修正したものです。はじめのノードが飲料自販機を含めるものであったのならご指摘の通りかと思います。
OKANO Takayoshi (2017-03-07 08:51:57+00:00): お返事ありがとうございます。元の意図が不明なので、近く現地を確認しに行く予定です。
kei murabayashi (2017-03-07 09:04:53+00:00): ありがとうございます。それでは更新についてはお任せいたします。
praeteritum (2024-01-10 12:29:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146102341.
lonvia (2017-07-02 08:51:32+00:00): Hi, I see that you have tagged a lot of subdivisions in Nassau with boundary=administrative and admin_level=3. Level 3 is normally for states and the like (e.g. California in the US). These subdivisions look more like suburbs, which should get something like admin_level=9. At least they should have a higher number than the district they are in (which is New Providence with admin_level=6), so that the hierarchy becomes clear. You'll see that when you search for places in Nassau that the results are very confused at the moment because of the broken hierarchy. Any chance you could change the admin_level for all the subdivisions you have mapped?
praeteritum (2024-01-09 11:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146063441.
praeteritum (2024-01-09 11:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146063311.
watmildon (2024-02-13 00:38:35+00:00): Was doing some minor tag cleanup and the work here is lovely. Nice mapping!
IlyazKaya (2021-08-22 06:25:52+00:00): Tried entering this trail from the west trailhead on 20-08-2021. This trail is not visible on the ground and doesn't have any markers. Don't understand why it is on the map.
jobatey (2020-02-24 15:41:02+00:00): You have vandalized some power lines, probably inadvertently: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81369003
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-04 21:00:30+00:00): @jobatey - if you recognise it was accidential, why do you call it vandalism?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
Владимир К (2017-03-07 06:29:59+00:00): Пишите, пожалуйста, обычными буквами.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
hurden (2017-03-07 09:15:00+00:00): unfortunately contains a lot of invalid objects. 
Clearly invalid objects have been cleaned up in #46643515 and #46643347

the remaining objects will be fixed/realigned/cleaned-up after likely review by @CorinaM2015
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
mueschel (2017-03-10 08:17:06+00:00): Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222
There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake?
Jan
worldwidewolford (2017-03-10 08:41:19+00:00): It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me.
Cheers
mueschel (2017-03-10 15:55:24+00:00): Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ.
You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
worldwidewolford (2017-03-10 20:31:14+00:00): Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
mueschel (2017-03-11 13:41:59+00:00): Changed the tags back.
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46724997 where the changeset comment is:
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:41:19+00:00): Reverting Vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46724588 where the changeset comment is:
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:57:22+00:00): Reverting Vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46724931 where the changeset comment is:
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-09 23:38:31+00:00): Reverting Vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 10:32:58+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
hurden (2017-03-07 09:14:04+00:00): unfortunately contains a lot of invalid objects. 
Clearly invalid objects have been cleaned up in #46643515 and #46643347

the remaining objects will be fixed/realigned/cleaned-up after likely review by @CorinaM2015
hurden (2017-03-07 09:11:07+00:00): unfortunately contains a lot of invalid objects.
Clearly invalid objects have been cleaned up in #46643515 and #46643347
hurden (2017-03-07 09:13:25+00:00): the remaining objects will be fixed/realigned/cleaned-up after likely review by @CorinaM2015
apm-wa (2017-03-08 11:22:51+00:00): Спасибо за добавление светофоров!  Однако, не надо называть их (т.е. заполнять поле Name).  И так понятно, что они -- traffic signals.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:10:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
Alexander-II (2017-03-07 07:48:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Ларек" - это название заведения или вы так описали строение?
Chris Fleming (2017-03-07 10:15:11+00:00): Hi, I messaged you yesterday. Please don't remove our individually mapped trees and replace them with rows are areas?
keithonearth (2017-03-07 08:29:12+00:00): If you are like me, and feel a kind of thrill when you download the data for an area through JOSM, and it returns "No data found in this area" then try to do some mapping in this area. 

Its pretty fun, with lots of rivers, streams, lakes, and road completely unmapped. :-)
Wulfmorn (2017-03-07 18:08:56+00:00): Hi. You seem to have used a little bit over the top mapping here, with a multi-polygon for this simple building. You should draw it as a simple closed path area. Furthermore, it shouldn't be tagged as "house". Use "building" or "garage".
caamodt (2017-03-08 06:28:09+00:00): Hi. Thank you for feedback. Tagged as garage now. How do I draw it as a simple closed path area? I did not see a lot of options. I just chose "area" and started drawing...
Wulfmorn (2017-03-08 17:04:50+00:00): I don't know what you've done to accomplish it, but you have created it as a multipolygon. You can see two corners have large round nodes and if you click the sides you only select half the building. This is of course not necessary for such a simple building. Easiest way to fix is to delete it and draw it again :)

Oh, and when you select a tag, you can click the info icon next to it. Most common tags have very useful descriptions there.
caamodt (2017-03-09 06:42:10+00:00): Thanks. I deleted it and made it again. Hopefully I got it right this time :-)
Wulfmorn (2017-03-09 16:01:42+00:00): Perfect! :D
caamodt (2017-03-10 08:46:14+00:00): just one question :-)
When I added a few new houses as 'House' with an address, the street number shows up on the actual house in addition to the point number that was already there. Should the point be deleted? Or should the building be a 'Building' without address, as most of the houses in the area?
Wulfmorn (2017-03-10 16:34:24+00:00): The points are loaded directly from Kartverket databases. Consider them the addresses. Dont bother moving them much either. Just add the buildings (without address information)
Wulfmorn (2017-03-10 16:39:05+00:00): You can add all kind of other things too. I have added driveways to your garage (with motor_vehice=private). Dont be afraid to add trees, walk paths and other useful information. Just make sure that roads that intersect are connected with a node. You can also use things like http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ to check if you've done something ill advised :)
caamodt (2017-03-10 16:43:00+00:00): thank you :-)
Euskirchener (2017-03-07 11:31:31+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Frage: Wer oder was soll "dailymandt" sein? Ich finde darüber nichts im Netz. Zudem reicht allein nur ein Name nicht aus, um ein Objekt als etwas bestimmtes zu kennzeichnen. Bitte erkläre, was deine Absicht war, dann kann ich helfen.

Gruß, CorrectMapper
Euskirchener (2017-03-08 10:34:05+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

ich habe gesehen, dass du weitere Beiträge gemacht hast, leider wieder ohne das korrekte Tagging. Würdest du dich bitte erst mal hier (und bei einem anderen User, der auch einen deiner Änderungssätze kommentiert hat), antworten, bevor du weitermachst.

Gruß, CorrectMapper
Euskirchener (2017-03-13 16:53:25+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

sorry, aber ich habe deine Änderung zurückgesetzt. War ja sowieso nur ein Name. Solltest du belegen können, dass es "dailymandt" wirklich dort gibt und bereit sein, entsprechend unserer Wiki korrekt zu taggen, kannst du es ja gerne machen.

Bedenke, dass OpenStreetMap ein Community-Projekt ist, das nur funktioniert, wenn man untereinander kommuniziert.

-CorrectMapper
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:00:04+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478996069
has no tags. What is it?
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-17 19:52:11+00:00): Hi David Kreft, did you see the tags of the deleted highways? It was a highway=track

For more information about highway-tag, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
David Kreft (2017-03-17 19:54:56+00:00): I did the problem is that was a mistake too the path in the deepest forest was a highway  i live there trust me my friend
Polarbear-repair (2017-03-18 00:50:53+00:00): The forestry tracks are visible in DOP 2011-2016 and there is a mapillary trace as well.
Polarbear-repair (2017-03-18 14:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by OSM community members in CS 46955024 and 46940025. 
Reason for the revert were unreasonable deletions.
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-17 19:44:08+00:00): Hi David Kreft, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind removing many mapped highway/paths in this changeset? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46644871
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-17 19:46:11+00:00): Sry, I meant http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46644871
Polarbear-repair (2017-03-18 14:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by OSM community members in CS 46955024 and 46940025. 
Reason for the revert were unreasonable deletions.
user_5359 (2017-03-07 19:24:22+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte: Ein building=Kinderheim sagt nicht, dass dort ein Kinderheim ist, sondern nur, dass das Gebäude so gebaut ist wie ein Kinderheim. Bitte lies unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Kinderheim nach, wie man ein Kinderheim genuer beschrieben kann.
eggie (2017-03-07 10:46:16+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-07 11:40:47+00:00): amenity=community_centre toegevoegd op node
eggie (2017-03-07 10:46:46+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-07 11:13:24+00:00): Je hebt de Johan Frisostraat als pedestrian (voetgangersgebied) ingetekend. Is dat echt de bedoeling?
Mogen hier alleen voetgangers komen?
eggie (2017-03-07 11:16:16+00:00): Daarbij heb je de oude Johan Frisostraat gewist waardoor de historie van de edits verloren is gegaan.
Is dit misschien een vergissing?
eggie (2017-03-07 11:48:38+00:00): Ik heb de edit teruggedraaid. Mocht de Johan Frisostraat tot wandelgebied zijn verklaard dan hoor ik dat graag.
eggie (2017-03-07 11:51:47+00:00): De Bonifatiuskerk was al getagd als kerk. Dat was nu dubbelop.
eggie (2017-03-07 12:23:49+00:00): Reverted.. na overleg mapper. Het was een misverstand.
neuhausr (2017-04-11 16:08:18+00:00): I'm wondering why you are adding wikidata tags to individual highway ways (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45782591), and not to relations that collect those ways in a route (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1630660)?
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-09 11:49:24+00:00): Hi vigneron, please wollow OSM wiki (wikipedia=lang:Name), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thanks, Alex
VIGNERON (2017-03-09 11:56:17+00:00): Ooups, you're absolutetly right! I'll check my other edits.