piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NGL-engel (2019-08-27 09:04:44+00:00): p.s. 
zu meiner Entschuldigung. Wie du bereits auch festgestellt hat, kartiere ich die Radwege schon immer, also ein paar Jahre, als Radweg. In der letzten Woche hat mich zum ersten Mal jemand angesprochen. Aber da ging es hauptsächlich um einen bestimmten Weg, und ob dort ein Schild (Rad- und Fußweg) steht.
Deshalb bin ich davon ausgegangen das highway=cycleway richtig bzw. richtiger ist. Und verkehrt scheint es auf alle Fälle ja auch nicht zu sein.
skorpion62 (2019-08-27 10:27:12+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

da ich JOSM benutze, habe ich für den kombinierten Fuß-und Radweg einen Button mit dem Verkehrsschild traffic_sign=DE:240, den ich nur anklicken brauch und alle wichtigen Grundeinträge dafür sind vorhanden. Ich brauch dann nur noch die Beschaffenheit des Weges usw. dazu eintragen. 
So gibt es für viele Gebotsschilder einen speziellen Button, wo man eben die Besonderheiten nur noch eintragen muss. 
Außerdem kann man da eine Historie aufrufen, in der man sehen kann, was an dem Objekt  gemacht wurde und auch warum. Vorausgesetzt die betreffende Person hat es korrekt  eingetragen. 

Ich schreibe immer dazu, was und wo ich etwas verändert habe. 
Zusätzlich trage ich auch noch die Quelle ein, woher ich mein Wissen habe, z.B. erkundet, lokales Wissen usw. .

Ich habe mir mal den Web Browser angesehen, der ist mir aber zu einfach, der JOSM ist viel komfortabler. Damit hat man einfach mehr Möglichkeiten zu mappen.

Wenn ich richtig informiert bin, ist Deine Version für den Fuß-und Radweg schon 2009 in Deutschland  bei JOSM  in path geändert worden. Wenn das nicht stimmen sollte , kann mich ja einer korrigieren.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen 
skorpion62
NGL-engel (2019-08-27 10:50:41+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
   ich hatte bei OSM (eben weil es mir selbst aufgefallen war) nachgefragt welche der Versionen richtig ist bzw. welche zu bevorzugen ist und am 22.8.2019 folgende Antwort bekommen (Original Zitat aus der Antwortmail): "Man kann Wege mit Zeichen 
240 (Gemeinsamer Rad- und Fußweg) als gleichermaßen Fußweg und Radweg 
ansehen (dann highway=path als "neutrale" Alternative) oder auf Basis 
der "größeren" Verkehrsmittel taggen (dann highway=cycleway)." Siehe auch dazu den Link den ich Dir mit meiner Ersten Antwort geschickt habe. 

Ich werde versuchen mich in Zukunft ein wenig mit den Änderungen zurückzuhalten. Und habe natürlich auch nichts dagegen wenn Du den Weg wieder zurückänderst.
Jedenfalls freundlich das Du mich auf diese Problematik hingewiesen hast. Es hätte ja auch komplett falsch bzw. ungebräuchlich sein können. 
Und vielleicht sollte ich mir den JOSM doch noch einmal anschauen - bis jetzt habe ich nur Gutes darüber gehört.
Gruß
    Angela
skorpion62 (2019-08-27 12:13:06+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

Du solltest Dir wirklich JOSM mal anschauen, es ist ein sehr  gutes Programm zum Mappen.

Es wird sicher eine Umstellung sein, aber die lohnt sich auch.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
skorpion62
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
dmlu (2018-03-15 22:22:00+00:00): Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Chargy_Import_Luxembourg
marc__marc (2024-08-15 13:34:15+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5481379291 et une série d'autres
c'est fermé ou ouvert ? :)
2 tags sont en contradiction
Cordialement,
Marc
corfede (2018-03-23 20:24:58+00:00): Ciao Michele, quello che hai aggiunto è proprio un campetto di calcio? Non riesco a vederlo nelle foto, forse è solo un'area giochi per bambini (tipo scivoli, altalene, ecc.)?
viloan (2018-03-15 22:21:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
iz11 (2018-03-15 22:38:54+00:00): Changeset comment nem jó, ezt akartam:  Tahi,  földutak, ösvények a Duna-parton
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Francesco Tili (2018-05-03 19:05:52+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, secondo me non conviene mettere il nome alle uscite. Primo perché nella mappa si vedono anche da molto lontano, e non si capisce se sono nomi di paesi o cosa... insomma io non le metterei, inoltre non è una superstrada vera e propria (accetto la classificazione) che ha le uscite con un nome preciso... cosa ne pensi?
Alessandro Antonelli (2018-05-03 23:05:02+00:00): Ciao, sulla prima cosa che dici non sono molto d'accordo, perché altrimenti bisognerebbe togliere i nomi delle uscite dappertutto (se ci fai caso anche altrove è così): direi che la "colpa" è della grafica di openstreetmap che evidenzia eccessivamente il nome delle uscite, addirittura di più dei nomi dei paesi. Comunque posso capire il problema, specialmente perché la Tre Valli Umbre è ancora in gran parte incompleta, e forse può generare confusione indicare gli svincoli nei piccoli pezzetti di superstrada realizzati. Se pensi sia meglio togliere i nomi degli svincoli, non mi oppongo. Penso però che, una volta che la strada sarà completata, si potranno rimettere (ahimè credo passerà molto tempo...)
Alessandro Antonelli (2018-05-03 23:16:17+00:00): Sulla classificazione della strada, sono d'accordissimo che strade come questa siano di livello più basso rispetto a superstrade a due carreggiate (es. la E45). Ma purtroppo Open Street map non contempla una categoria intermedia per le "strade a scorrimento veloce". In questi casi, io credo che sia meglio inserirla come "superstrada", perché questo permette di evidenziare i tratti di strada vecchia da quelli dove è stata costruita la variante: tra il vecchio tracciato e quello nuovo c'è davvero un abisso, e mi sembra profondamente sbagliato riportare i due tratti con lo stesso colore. Credo che il lettore sia interessato a sapere la differenza tra gli uni e gli altri tratti. Del resto in tantissimi casi di strade a scorrimento veloce ho visto che la situazione era già indicata così, e io ho seguito questa tendenza. Certo capisco che, dove passano vicino una strada a scorrimento veloce e una superstrada "vera", la mappa non mostra nessuna differenza tra le due, mentre dovrebbero essercene...
Francesco Tili (2018-05-05 06:21:07+00:00): Per la superstrada sono d'accordo, ho visto che OSM le accetta! Basta che non abbiano incroci a raso, e questo è il nostro caso :) per i nomi delle uscite, sono d'accordo a fare come dici tu...a toglierli finché non è completa la strada (alla fine io credo che nessuno, oggi, usi il nome dell'uscita per navigare sulla Tre Valli, ma potrei sbagliarmi) ...
wille (2018-03-15 22:51:21+00:00): Hi! I have reviewed your edit and its correct! thank you very much!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57226491
wille (2018-03-15 22:48:51+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57226513
phicoh (2018-05-02 11:35:44+00:00): Why did you change a cycle path into a footway? That breaks routing for bicycles. Please don't do that!

If you want to map the zebra crossing then do so next to the cycle path.

 I'll change it back to a cycle path.
eggie (2018-03-16 06:00:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Beschrijf in je commentaar wat je edits inhouden.. dus.. "oneway "=yes veranderd in oneway=no.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:09:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-09 19:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59696980 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changes by Mersuna, uschim, Atnorb and recent changes by nstb, michelwolf, alk63 and bert_w due to advanced vandalism, mechanical editing and bullying of fellow mappers.
eggie (2018-03-16 06:02:48+00:00): Oke. graag beschrijven wat je edits inhouden.  foot=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad.
Martin Borsje (2018-03-16 21:10:59+00:00): Misschien dat je een nuttiger comment dan 'Autisme' kunt gebruiken?
S-zation (2018-03-15 23:15:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all of the changes made in changesets 57213511, 57213325, 57213247
viloan (2018-03-15 23:53:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-03-20 16:30:05+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "designation:ca" on two relations - I don't think this is right. ':ca' is the suffix for Catalan language and the value seems to be French.
Jan
PierZen (2018-03-20 16:53:05+00:00): Confusion between the iso CA and language ca. Corrected.
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:03:00+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57228224
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:40:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
freebeer (2018-07-05 22:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60449237 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
hfs (2018-05-03 09:48:42+00:00): Hi,

sind hier wirklich zwei Rossmann-Filialen einander gegenüber Am Markt? Oder ist vielleicht die Filiale von gegenüber hierher umgezogen?
viloan (2018-03-16 01:24:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
atcomapper (2018-03-16 05:08:52+00:00): Jeg har ændret husnummeret tilbage til 25, da det er korrekt. Nummer 99 ligger længere nordøstpå, lige overfor letbane-stationen. Se evt. https://webkort.aarhuskommune.dk/spatialmap
Vær opmærksom på, at adresser (dvs. husnumre, vejnavne, postnumre osv.) normalt ikke skal redigeres manuelt i Danmark, da de bliver importeret fra en officiel database.
Michael M M (2018-03-16 06:50:20+00:00): På Google står der 99,
Se mere her: https://www.google.dk/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=-WirWp7rLZGykwXti5TYCw&q=dansk+center+for+partikelterapi&oq=dansk+&gs_l=psy-ab.3.0.35i39k1l2j0j0i131k1j0l6.379.1493.0.2549.7.6.0.0.0.0.194.569.1j3.4.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..3.4.569.0...0.XsFYDoPoz6M
Hjart (2018-03-16 07:45:51+00:00): Tja, ifølge https://m.rm.dk/?l=2196 befinder centeret sig slet ikke i denne bygning
osmviborg (2018-03-16 08:09:23+00:00): Fælles postadresse for hospitalet:
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99
8200 Aarhus N
http://www.auh.dk/kontakt/
osmviborg (2018-03-16 08:14:00+00:00): Nr. 25: http://www.auh.dk/om-auh/afdelinger/dansk-center-for-partikelterapi/hvor-langt-er-vi/byggeriet1/
Hjart (2018-03-16 08:39:11+00:00): Nu er det ikke sikkert vi helt kan stole på de adresser vi har i området. Vi har i OSM ikke haft nogen generel opdatering af adresser i et års tid nu og vores adresser i dette område er sidst rørt ved i 2015. Der kan jo være sket meget siden da ;-)
atcomapper (2018-03-16 09:34:15+00:00): Vi må gå ud fra at Aarhus Kommune selv har styr på deres adresser - og hos dem står der, jf. link herover, at den pågældende adresse er nr. 25. Om Center for Partikelterapi så er ved at flytet til en ny adresse og endnu ikke har opdateret adressen på deres hjemmeside, det må være sagen uvedkommende.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
5m4u9 (2018-03-16 15:27:34+00:00): gracias por registrar el cerro, aun nos falta muchos picos por registrar
//
estuve viendo la imagen satelital y datos de curvas de nivel, y parece que el lugar mas alto es más al oeste-sur.. se nota un un scree (

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dscree
//
no estoy seguro pero creo que el pico es el limite morochata-quillacollo, revisaré documentos
hofoen (2018-03-16 06:31:40+00:00): Why did you revert my changeset? I have not removed a single tag. There is no "less specific tagging".
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-17 15:26:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Social-protected-area
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-19 12:39:04+00:00): Bom dia Victor, um usuário deletou as casas que voce adicionou aqui neste local: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101284596?filters=%7B%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22101284596%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22101284596%22%7D%5D%7D
user_5359 (2018-03-16 05:25:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't believe on church in the middle of the street. I delete this node.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:22:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
muralito (2018-03-23 12:57:53+00:00): Los ATM hay que maparlos por separado como nodo, no como atm=yes en el banco, en general porque tienen un horario mas extendido que el banco.
muralito (2018-03-23 12:58:40+00:00): O sea todo este cambio no es lo adecuado., ya qye ademas los cajeros ya estaban mapeados por separado.
ismaell (2018-03-30 19:33:25+00:00): ¿Hay que poner un nodo por ATM físico o basta con un nodo para todos?
muralito (2018-03-30 20:08:01+00:00): Creo que con uno basta. No he visto mas de uno juntos, y en muchos lados ya hay varios en el mismo local. Es cono que se mapea el servcio y listo.
muralito (2018-03-30 20:08:57+00:00): con uno por local quiero decir, en esta zona que hay varios bancos, cada banco tiene su servicio de atm, y cada servicio se mapea aparte.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:23:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
atcomapper (2018-03-16 05:11:44+00:00): Correction, changeset with wrong edit is 57228309
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:18:41+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
PlaneMad (2018-03-19 17:50:45+00:00): Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building a better map of your area soon!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57230894
user_5359 (2018-03-16 15:43:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby. Also I see a difference between name and the other values!
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
osmviborg (2018-03-16 06:45:54+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery
osmviborg (2018-03-16 06:47:01+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery
osmviborg (2018-03-16 06:46:45+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery
osmviborg (2018-03-16 06:46:20+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:24:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964