piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-04-01 11:40:24+00:00): it never had that name. reverted
mavl (2019-07-21 15:08:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:08:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-03-29 13:08:44+00:00): Dag Jeroen. Wanneer je het zeker weet zou ik gewoon access=no taggen op die barrier=gate
Je kunt het ook aan Pieter - Ede vragen. Hij is de lokale mapper hier.
Gr Eggie
mavl (2019-07-21 15:08:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
DUGA (2021-04-04 15:19:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680308539

It is incorrect, the parking aisle never connects to the fire lane (main entrance/exit service road)
rojganes (2021-04-05 06:49:01+00:00): Hi, 

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the misalignment of the road, will make sure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you. 

Regards, 
rojganes
Hjart (2019-03-29 13:41:53+00:00): The danish SDFE aerial imagery (from last spring) covers this area. I have allowed myself to delete a few of the houses in this changeset based on that as well as add a number of newer houses etc.
Zartbitter (2019-03-29 18:10:11+00:00): Thanks! I mostly used Digitalglobe which has very recent images but only in a few zoom levels. And I used some official images just to cross check a few places but noticed that the official images are somewhat outdated.
Zartbitter (2019-03-29 21:41:29+00:00): OK, I see, there where just two small outbuildings which do not exist anymore but are still visible on other imagery. Thanks for pointing out SDFE aerial.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-03-29 12:56:15+00:00): Dag Erik,
Wellicht ook even de adressen weghalen en de highway=service intekenen?
MVG,
Eggie
viloan (2019-03-29 11:16:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ejont (2019-04-06 09:41:44+00:00): Hi! You deleted part of a canal here.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
WingardiumMapiosa (2020-01-15 00:36:13+00:00): Hey Hendrikklaas, thanks for mapping the Isle of Pines relation. 

I noticed that there were a few errors in this relation where you’ve added some beach features as inner members where they are actually sharing a boundary with the outer member at these locations (ex. www.openstreetmap.org/way/680310924, www.openstreetmap.org/way/680312603). 

Unfortunately this is causing errors in this relation (JOSM validation says "Multipolygon outer way shares segment(s) with other ring" 

See the last point under "Valid Multipolygon Conditions" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Valid_Multipolygon_conditions. 

I do not think that it’s required for these beaches to be inner members since the island feature won’t render over these beaches, removing these features as inner members could resolve this, but I wanted to reach out to you about this before making any changes.
ghostrider44 (2019-09-29 11:36:00+00:00): Hallo quellcode1234,
du hast am Gebäude der TSV-Gaststätte am 29.03.2019 am Schlüssel building den Wert von yes auf retail gesetzt.
Auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=retail
kann ich nicht erkennen, dass für eine Gaststätte dieser Wert korrekt ist. Was ist der Grund für deine Änderung?
Gruß ghostrider44
quellcode1234 (2019-09-29 12:14:16+00:00): Hallo ghostrider44,

gute Frage! Ich hatte damals offenbar eine Frage in "SteetComplete" beantwortet und weiß nicht mehr, welche Optionen angeboten wurden. Für "Restaurant" oder "Vereinsheim" gibt es offenbar kein genau passendes Tag. Am ehesten vielleicht building=commercial oder einfach building=yes? Anderseits: Hier wird "Restaurant" als Beispiel unter "retail" genannt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Viele Grüße!
ghostrider44 (2019-09-29 15:04:51+00:00): Hallo quellcode1234,
ich bin mir nun auch nicht sicher. Deshalb habe ich das Forum gefragt.
Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=764183#p764183
Gruß ghostrider44
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 11:42:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68659769.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 12:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68663666 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2626
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
4004 (2019-04-15 00:28:45+00:00): здравствуйте,
а ламода там именно магазин или пункт доставки?
Anastasia Koshmar (2019-04-15 05:45:40+00:00): здравствуйте, пункт доставки!
4004 (2019-04-18 20:46:29+00:00): спасибо, поменял
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:09:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
naomap (2019-04-15 06:57:15+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.

Pour info j'ai remplacé les highway=bus_guideway qui ne serait plus adapté au busway, en encore ce n'est pas le choix qui a été fait. Il s'agit ici de simples voies réservées au bus, qui se décrivent pas l'ajout du tag busway=lane (ou busway:right=lane si on veut préciser le côté) sur la chaussée. Comme il s'agit d'une même chaussée on ne crée qu'un seul way sur lequel on ajoute autant de tags que nécessaire.

J'espère être clair. Pour info on (collectif OSM informel) organise un atelier chaque mois à Nantes, n'hésite pas à nous rejoindre. Plus d'infos : http://nantes.openstreetmap.fr/

Cordialement, Antoine.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
M_Kucha (2019-03-29 16:04:10+00:00): Hallo Chris,

Du hast in diesem Changeset auch die drei Tags cycle_network, name und rcn_ref vom Node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/71105389 (Kreuzungspunkt von Wegen) enttfernt und sie dem nicht weit davon entferntem Node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6220901118 (gleichnamiger Wegweiser) zugeordnet.

Dies hat mit dem im Changeset genannten Kommentar nichts gemeinsam und ist auch aus meiner Sicht schlicht falsch und wird durch entsprechende QM-Tools (hier knooppuntnet.nl) auch so moniert. Durch das Tag rcn_ref wurde der Wegekreuzungspunkt  als Knotenpunkt des Radknotenpunktnetzwerks radrevier.ruhr gekennzeichnet. Solche Knotenpunkte gehören definitiv auf einen Weg bzw. besser auf Kreuzungspunkt von Wegen. Guideposts dagegen sind an diesen Stellen nicht sinnvoll, sondern sollten wie aktuell gemappt, am Wegrand stehen. 

Die von Dir vorgenommene Übertragung der Tags auf den Guidepost ist daher unsinnig und ich bitte Dich, dies nachzuprüfen und die Änderung wieder zurückzunehmen. Zum Verständnis empfehle ich die WIKI-Seite zu Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Fahrradroutentagging#Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerk allgemein und zum hier gepflegtem Netzwerk radrevier.ruhr https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Knotenpunktsystem_radrevier.ruhr.

Da diese Änderungen in einem umfangreichen Changeset zu einem anderen Anlass, Löschen redundanter associated street Relationen, enthalten sind, habe ich nicht weiter nachgeprüft, ob weitere "Beifänge" dieser Art darin enthalten sind. 

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.

Martin
chris66 (2019-03-29 18:46:45+00:00): Danke, werde den Knoten auf den alten Stand zurücksetzen.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-16 13:22:38+00:00): سلام دوست گرامی
شما در این چنجست برای کوچه اندیشه هشت از تگ
highway=tertiary
استفاده کردین که اشتباه هست و باید از تگ
highway=residential
استفاده کنین.
برای اینکه نشون بدین یک کوچه بن بست هست باید برای نقطه ی انتهایی کوچه از تگ
noexit=yes
استفاده کنین.
لطفاً سرعت مجازها رو فقط بر اساس تابلو تغییر بدین و در صورتی که تابلویی وجود ندارهسرعت مجازهای موجود رو افزایش یا کاهش ندین.
لطف کنین کامنتاتون رو فارسی بنویسین و یا بهتره بگم فارسی هم بنویسین و تا جای ممکن شفاف توضیح بدین که دقیقاً چه ادیتی انجام دادین.
ممنون اززحمتی که دارین برای نقشه میکشین و ممنون از اینکه توجه میفرمایید.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-16 13:38:47+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
وقتی که انتهای کوچه فقط برای عبور خودرو محدود هست لطفاً اتصال رو قطع نکنین و فقط اون قسمتی که برای عبور خودرو نیست رو تغییر بدین.
لطفاً کامنتاتون رو فارسی بذارین چرا که تقریباً تمامی ادیتورهای نقشه ی ایران فارسی زبان هستند.
کامنت انگلیسی گذاشتن خوبه ولی فقط به زبان انگلیسی گذاشتن ایده ی خوبی نیست.
ممنون از زحمتی که دارین برای نقشه میکشین و ممنون از اینکه توجه میفرمایید.
Frans S (2019-04-02 15:09:53+00:00): Hi Milo,  Thanks for mapping here.  A request.
Please review your knowledge about african Highways.  
See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Highways in rural area, just in agriculture areas are no unclassified highways. max track.
Best regards and keep mappings
berndw (2019-04-01 16:10:01+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei OSM

Es war die richtige Kategorie der Fläche vorhanden, nämlich landuse=residential.

Die Häuser sind teilweise von Grün umgeben, das sollte man separat erfassen ohne schon vorhandenes zu zerstören.

Ich werde das zurücksetzen

Bernd
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 12:34:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68662147.
ejont (2019-04-06 09:43:32+00:00): Hi! You deleted a part of a road here.
ejont (2019-04-27 09:49:17+00:00): partly reverted
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 13:46:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68666100 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2627
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-16 13:52:36+00:00): سلام 
شما توی این چنجست اقدام به ایجاد یک خط مجزا برای اتوبوس از میدان مشتاق به آزادی کردین که این کار درست نیست چون از قبل تگهای مربوط به خط اتوبوس به معبر اصلی داده شده اند.
در کل یک معبر با یک خط رسم میشه مگر اینکه توسط جدا کننده ی فیزیکی ای به دو یا چند قسمت تقسیم شده باشه، و سایر موارد با تگذاری و ایجاد ریلیشن ایجاد میشن. مثلاً یک خط اتوبوس با ریلیشن باید ایجاد بشه نه رسم یک خط جدید.
Hjart (2019-03-29 13:47:24+00:00): Bemærk at gangstierne her skal forbindes til de tilstødende veje. Ellers kommer navigation ikke til at fungere korrekt. Jeg har tilladt mig at føre dem her ud og forbinde dem
Hjart (2019-03-29 13:52:07+00:00): Har supermarkedet i øvrigt et navn (Fakta, Netto, Aldi etc)?
Eskil Rasmussen (2019-03-29 14:09:31+00:00): Ja det er en fakta
Er ny til det her 
Retter det nu
Hjart (2019-03-29 15:40:31+00:00): Helt i orden 😀 Det er ret almindelige begynderfejl.
ejont (2019-04-03 16:18:42+00:00): Hey, you deleted part of a National Highway here! Why?
ejont (2019-04-05 08:36:37+00:00): fixed
Frans S (2019-10-08 15:21:03+00:00): Hello Hannah. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
A request. Always square rectangular buildings with the Q key in iDeditor. You missed quite a lot.
Another issue. Please let nodes of buildings not connect to nodes of other buildings. 
Thanks, Best regards and keep mapping
Florimondable (2019-05-23 15:06:14+00:00): Bonjour, je crois qu'il y a un problème sur l'emplacement des toilettes ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2262012007
GeorgeKaplan (2020-05-23 08:53:18+00:00): J'ai remis les toilettes à la bonne place.
booktiger (2019-04-14 09:18:54+00:00): 您的本次编辑中，铁路牛栏山站北面的铁路出现较为严重的偏移，请注意及时修正。
Tomas Straupis (2019-03-29 16:38:50+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas
Nilo72 (2019-03-31 00:02:37+00:00): what is wrong?
Tomas Straupis (2019-03-31 08:49:19+00:00): Capital letters are used in house numbers.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 13:46:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68664552.
BAK365 (2019-03-29 21:53:28+00:00): Hallo,
wieso hast du die Zugangsbeschränkungen für die Längenegg- und die Tschachenstrasse geändert? Was war deiner Meinung nach falsch?
threefoursixninefour (2019-04-01 08:32:09+00:00): Hallo,

Thanks for your comment.  I has misread the Tschachenstrasse sign while surveying and noted it as a complete prohibition.  Having checked again it seems that the restriction is for motor_vehicle only, so I have now changed it back.

Should Längeneggstrasse be motor_vehicle=private not motor_vehicle=no, since it is allowed to landowners with permission?  (The sign also says 4WD only, but that as an access key is controversial).
BAK365 (2019-04-01 16:52:40+00:00): Die 3 Zusatztafeln zum Fahrverbot - ein gelb-schwarzes Signal, "Nur mit Bewilligung Gemeinderat Ennenda gestattet" (den gibts seit 2011 nicht mehr) und "Nur mit Allrad" - habe ich vor allem mit dem Militärbetrieb in Verbindung gebracht. Signale fürs Militär tagge ich grundsätzlich nicht, daher fand ich access=no passender.

Die Unterscheidung no/private ist aber m.E. ohne praktische Bedeutung. Wenn du das für den untersten Teil der Längeneggstrasse änderst, müsstest du allerdings auch die oberen Abschnitte noch anpassen.

Bicycle=yes und foot= yes finde ich in jedem Fall überflüssig.
ejont (2019-04-25 11:00:58+00:00): Hello!
Why did you delete part of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335046439 ?
eggie (2019-03-29 17:09:07+00:00): Bas..  Lijkt mij oke. Zoekopdrachten werken even niet. Vanmiddag kon ik nog wel de gelijknamige bushaltes vinden.
Gr Eggie
mosstreet (2019-03-29 14:23:47+00:00): Какой там мост? нет обозначения моста. Если все же там есть, обозначьте. При ремонте используйте тег Construction
GRIGORIY99 (2019-03-29 14:30:46+00:00): Там есть маленький мостик, который закрыли на ремонт
mosstreet (2019-03-29 16:26:39+00:00): Посмотрите, тут дорогу ремонтируют? Поправил там где увидел ручей. Если да, то в дальнейшем не забудьте после ремонта вернуть на мост тег, как на дороге
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
totera (2019-03-31 19:28:55+00:00): Ciao Giordano, e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Il Cammino di Assisi è già indicato da una relazione e non è corretto aggiungere il nome di un itinerario alle strade che lo compongono.
kartonage (2019-03-29 17:00:13+00:00): Can you stop this nonsense or explain yourself? I am getting tired of it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68562610
mbethke (2019-04-07 04:30:36+00:00): Moin,
das bringt so nix, da weitere Namen hinzuzufügen - zumal "Banana Leaf" ja auch kein Deutsch ist (wahrscheinlich benutzt dein  maps.me da automatisch ein name:de statt "name"?). Wenn ein POI einen *offiziellen* deutschen Namen hat, dann kann man den schon eintragen, aber i.d.R. ist er das dann eh schon, denn den haben selten mehr Dinge als Länder und große Städte. Bei name:de=Peking; name:en=Beijing macht das Sinn.

servus,
Matthias
mij-ch (2019-04-07 11:54:06+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Hinweis. maps.me zeigte mir zwei Eingabefelder an (English und Deutsch) deshalb habe ich da beides ausgefüllt. Grund war das sowohl der englische wie auch der deutsche Name vorhanden, aber fehlerhaft waren. 

Ich sehe aber den Sinn hinter den offiziellen deutschen Namen und werde mich in Zukunft darauf achten.

Gruss
mij
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-03-30 00:12:39+00:00): again, asking you why did you add this? this was shut down in 2015.
sandrine95 (2019-04-01 12:00:29+00:00): I had this information on the museum web site. (http://www.madeirastorycentre.com/fr/musee) 
And I think that this museum is open. I have read several recent reviews on different websites that give their opinions.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-04-01 12:07:45+00:00): Incorrect. The museum went bankrupt in 2015 as you can see on this news site https://www.dnoticias.pt/hemeroteca/497600-madeira-story-centre-encerra-portas-no-proximo-dia-13-de-fevereiro-BHDN497600 In late 2015 it reopened as a restaurant and shop only but kept its name. Source https://www.dnoticias.pt/impressa/hemeroteca/diario-de-noticias/555875-story-centre-reabre-com-loja-e-restaurante-PKDN555875

Please do not add data that's inaccurate and based on unreliable third party and unauthorized import to OSM. Especially when its a conflict of interest. The museum no longer exists for four years, the fact someone lists it on a website does not means it exists.
The name of Jardim Municipal do Funchal, is a example where the name was fetched from Trip Advisor (which is clearly wrong).
sandrine95 (2019-04-01 12:54:32+00:00): I agree with you, I know that websites such as "Trip Advisor" are prohibited. It was not my source. I have noted your remarks.
mikkolukas (2019-03-30 11:18:01+00:00): Velkommen til openstreetmap :)

Undskyld jeg går lige på og hårdt - intet personligt i det, men dette er bestemt ikke måden at bruge disse tags.

Hvis du kigger i wiki'en for highway=bus_stop ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_stop ), kan du f.eks. i ikonerne ude til højre se, at tagget kun bør bruges på en node (et punkt) og ikke på en way (streg).

Ligeledes er public_transport=platform ikke tiltænkt at blive brugt som gulvet i et busskur, på samme måde som det ikke ville blive brugt i gulvet på en ventesal (som bare kan ses som en større og mere komfortabel version af et busskur) ;)

Jeg startede selv med masser af begejstring og har oplevet senere at vende tilbage til nogle af mine første rettelser på openstreetmap og tænke "hvilken idiot har dog lavet dette?", bare for at konstatere at det var mig selv :D ... så igen, intet personligt i min feedback her :)

Wiki'en er et godt sted at få basis på plads for hvordan tingene skal rettes til :)

Igen, velkommen til :)
eggie (2019-03-29 16:29:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-03-29 16:23:44+00:00): why did you change the name?
sandrine95 (2019-04-01 12:10:51+00:00): I changed the tag "historic=fort" because the shape of this building is specific to a fort: rampart and fortification.
But if this explain is not correct for you, revert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 14:59:22+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The Correct term for an area set out for the playing golf is a golf course. Thus I have reinstated the leisure=golf_course that you amended. I also remove the golf=green and sport=golf from the area outline because they are unnecessary.

I also amended the tags you placed on the green and bunkers. I suspect that the green and bunkers are not formally named. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course  for guidance on golf course tagging.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
eggie (2021-09-09 09:02:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
YraFyra (2019-03-29 21:41:35+00:00): Hej
Roligt att någon från kommunen verkar vara inne och lägga till saker.
Jag har ändrat boden från att vara en punkt till att ha hela byggnaden.
Fortsätt gärna att lägga in saker som kommer till på Brunnshög!
Allison P (2019-03-30 00:33:57+00:00): Borah High School is already on the map as an area. I deleted the node.