piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2022-09-27 13:55:35+00:00): hola. el "historic" que borraste aquí tiene origen en el https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4463711 como "date", luego pasado a "historic" en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118925581

no tengo opinión fuerte al propósito, yo hubiera conservado el valor bajo la etiqueta "date", quizás "start_date", pero se lo dejo a los nacionales locales.
AngocA (2022-09-27 18:55:46+00:00): Hola Mario. Gracias por la observación, voy a tenerla en cuenta.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
JessAk71 (2022-10-02 20:49:19+00:00): Hi pabi12, this is another case where the entire building is not the poi so its best to place the poi in a node instead and leave the building as is since there are apartments in the floors above the restaurant. I have fixed this case on the map for you.
user_5359 (2022-09-27 09:10:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
literan (2022-09-27 16:59:11+00:00): вы поместили неровность на Некрасовскую линию метрополитена. Аккуратнее, пожалуйста
NikleDM (2022-09-28 05:04:37+00:00): Спасибо исправлюсь.
literan (2022-09-28 06:20:53+00:00): я уже поправил
emersonveenstra (2022-09-27 12:05:13+00:00): Hi,

What is maxspeed_explicit? The tag is not documented anywhere
himakadi (2022-09-29 11:22:40+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. Apologies for adding incorrect max speed tags, I have made the necessary changes in the changeset #126761188. It is an honest mistake from my end, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going forward. 

Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
himakadi
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-27 06:18:48+00:00): Negerai taip su mokykla. Jei mokykla kažkam žymima kaip plotas, tai reikia visas mokyklos žymas (name, adresą, svetainę ir pan.) perkelti plotui (iškyrus building). O mokyklos pastatui tada nuimti visas šitas žymas ir palikti tik building ir adresą.
DaanLT (2022-09-27 07:18:54+00:00): Ok, perkelsiu
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-27 11:50:02+00:00): Tai aš šitoj vietoj sutvarkiau - ne bėda :-) Rašiau tik kad būtų aiškumas, kodėl ką keičiu ir kaip kitose vietose reikia daryti (na arba nesutikti ir siūlyti kitaip daryti).
daganzdaanda (2022-12-29 22:37:48+00:00): Hallo Krustyyy,

es freut mich, dass du hier die Baustelle im Blick hast und aktualisierst! 

Stehen an der rückgebauten Straße eigentlich irgendwelche Schilder? Ich könnte mir gut vorstellen, dass das auch für Fahrräder, sowie Land- und Forstwirtschaftliche "motor-vehicles" erlaubt ist?
Auf jeden Fall kannst du die alten "cycleway:both=no" und "lane_markings=no" entfernen, die passen nicht mehr. Die tatsächlichen tags am Weg findest du bei iD, wenn du etwas runterscrollst und die "Eigenschaften" aufklappst.

A guads Neis, und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
user_5359 (2022-09-27 09:10:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Polarbear-repair (2022-09-29 21:20:22+00:00): Could you please explain why you removed the ferry route tag from the way and replaced it with motor_vehicle=no?
Thus you created an object without any physical property but with access tags?
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2022-10-03 15:31:21+00:00): Fährverbindung wird nicht mehr betrieben, siehe auch Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3371104
leider war es mir nicht möglich Objekt zu löschen, Bitte um Hilfe/Erläuterung
ivanbranco (2022-10-03 16:54:52+00:00): Hi, you couldn't delete it because in iD you have to see the whole object, but with big elements like this the zoom level doesn't allow you to edit. 

I know it's boring but if you want to stick to iD in these cases you could cut the element in shorter ways and slowly delete them one by one.
ivanbranco (2022-10-03 16:57:33+00:00): But I guess that with +90km ways it's better to just change editor
Polarbear (2022-10-03 22:53:22+00:00): Ich habe das Objekt jetzt gelöscht. 
Das Zerstückeln eines Weges, nur um ihn zu löschen ist keine gute Idee. 
 
I've delete the object now. 
Indeed chopping an object into smaller pieces just to delete them is not a good idea data-wise.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
MinerMax555 (2022-09-30 18:02:07+00:00): Both oneway streets going in and out of the roundabout are mapped as a single way. This breaks all the various routes that are mapped here. Could you please be a bit more careful in the future?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-09-27 06:52:08+00:00): Hej. Havnen er i forvejen markeret som en polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33453198 Jeg har slettet dit punkt.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:55:46+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=4;6
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640686207/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=5
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
user_5359 (2022-09-27 09:13:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2022-09-27 07:13:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Je hebt met je actie het gebouwdeel verwijderd. building=yes zorgt voor de rendering. 
Er is al een adesnode.. Beter geen adresinfo extra op de gebouwomtrek.
Het ziekenhuis is al getagd op het terrein. Het is niet juist om dat nog een keer te doen op een ander punt. Ambulancepost Amsterdam-Noord is niet het Ziekenhuis, maar een onderdeel.
Het lijkt me beter om je bijdrage voorlopig terug te draaien.  

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126682862

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-27 07:20:54+00:00): Alle info staat al op de adresnode met .. Ik draai de bijdrage voorlopig terug. De standaardkaart laat niet alle tags als symbool zien. In de data is het uiteraard wel te vinden.
eggie (2022-09-27 07:22:20+00:00): reverted by changeset #126683960
eggie (2022-09-27 07:26:16+00:00): De naam rendert nu op de adresnode. Het gebouw zal straks wel weer terugkomen op de kaart.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 
Groet
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ma-rt-in (2022-09-29 11:29:16+00:00): Hey,

Durchmesser geben wir in Meter in OSM an, sprich für 56 cm dann bitte 0.56 erfassen.

vg
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-27 10:25:58+00:00): Hi! These buildings have been imported from a good source. Yes, there maybe some small mistakes (e.g. spikes), but repositioning and redesigning them just lowers the overall quality. Thanks, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126683939
A_dige (2022-09-28 14:02:23+00:00): Hi Andrea Musuruane, Thanks for your feedback, I have aligned the building as per ground reality. Does this look correct to you?
As well, I would like to know more about this data import so that I can learn more and understand its background. Can you please share additional detail about it?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-29 07:43:55+00:00): Hi! Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Provincia_di_Biella
A_dige (2022-09-30 04:42:22+00:00): Thank you!
Nawfal85 (2022-09-27 12:49:16+00:00): good job, thanks
Gisolic (2022-09-27 14:47:20+00:00): Thank you for your comment i really appreciate it
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
JriSv250 (2022-10-02 04:20:41+00:00): Try not to sink an entire country again.
cdang (2022-10-02 13:12:35+00:00): Sorry, I wasn't even aware I modified something about Ethiopia.
martinst (2022-09-28 18:22:33+00:00): Wenn ein Weg so breit ist dass zweispurige Fahrzeuge darauf fahren können setzt man highway=track,  nicht path.
Hast Du das bei deinen Änderungen berücksichtigt?
ivanbranco (2022-09-28 22:27:11+00:00): Ciao 07_Pietro_21,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8223005979/history

brand=BiTs ?

"COS’È BiTS?
BiTS è il nuovo servizio di bike sharing a stazioni fisse del Comune di Trieste."
07_Pietro_21 (2022-09-29 07:12:11+00:00): Gentile Ivan,

Grazie mille per l'informazione!

Un caro saluto,
Pietro
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-27 08:02:07+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=18.997992%2C-98.340305%2C16.95
silversurfer83 (2022-09-29 15:11:44+00:00): Auf dem Luftbild ist das kein Haus (im Sinne eines Wohnhauses) zu sehen. Warum hast du den Tag dann von shed zu house geändert? Wenn es ein Schuppen ist, an dem tatsächlich groß ein Schild mit dem von Dir angegebenen Namen hängt, dann bitte auch korrekt taggen.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-04 09:53:22+00:00): Darf ich auf eine Antwort hoffen?
eggie (2022-09-27 09:16:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.. I merged your info with the present addressnode.

Greetz
eggie
BPTT (2022-10-11 19:59:07+00:00): I don't think it makes sense to remove the route where signs aren't present. They don't appear in Google Street View, but a few are there in person and this roadway is still accounted for as a bike route in the city's maps. Removing the route from this way and Brown creates a gap in CyclOSM.
1998alexkane (2022-10-11 20:24:55+00:00): The issue with the Milwaukee "Bike Routes" is the maintainence on them is essentially non-existant. In general, bike routes should be able to be followed using the signage on the ground. If the city is actively maintaining them, then sure, but I don't think we should have unmaintained, unsigned routes, as this gives the wrong impression to user of OSM based cycle maps

Perhaps adding this section (and the section on 2nd street which still has the signs) to a relation with the tag disused:route=bicycle would be the way to best capture this.
BPTT (2022-10-12 01:08:46+00:00): That sounds like the perfect compromise and use in this case!
eggie (2022-09-27 09:01:49+00:00): Dag Kneon.. al die accesstags zijn niet nodig. Die zijn default op een voetpad.

Mvg
Eggie
KneonSpace (2022-10-03 15:53:44+00:00): sorry, was mijn tweede keer dat ik bijdraag en ik wilde het niet fout doen.
eggie (2022-10-03 17:02:37+00:00): Hoi.. Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.
Editor suggereert dat je van alles 'moet'  invullen.. maar dat is niet nodig.

Veel plezier met mappen..
Eggie
Emilius123 (2023-08-09 23:32:23+00:00): Vespucci G
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 04:06:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/601997205/history has building:part = 25 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
ALu68 (2022-09-27 08:55:16+00:00): Hello JAMH78,

can you please stop giving your objects stupid names!

Regards.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
sjdunbar (2022-09-28 21:14:16+00:00): Thanks, will use this instead of semicolon moving forward.
eggie (2022-09-27 09:18:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Realiseer je dat al je toevoegingen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen.  De vraag is natuurlijk of een vermelding name=Verkeersongevallen hier thuis hoort?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-27 10:14:26+00:00): Tagging Verkeersongevallen Verwijderd... 
Wat is je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-28 00:24:27+00:00): Cześć, czy opis "apteczka" oznacza, że obok jest dostępna apteczka? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10055650459/history
polar7 (2022-09-28 10:41:09+00:00): Tak. W zestawie z AED jest apteczka.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Baloo Uriza (2022-09-28 03:21:41+00:00): This is probably more likely ref=CR E0560.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126687946
NastiaP1 (2022-09-28 07:48:02+00:00): Hello, Baloo Uriza! 
Thanks for your feedback, I've added ref.
PT-53 (2022-09-28 07:16:23+00:00): Hallo Jürri,
Du hast bei diesem Wegabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145736158/history
das Merkmal
- motor_vehicle=no
ergänzt. Das ist unnötig, da andere KFZ bereits durch das Merkmal
- access=agricultural
ausgeschlossen werden.
Die Änderung der Breite von 2.5m auf 2.0m halte ich für falsch. Auf dem Luftbild kann ich eine Breite von rd. 3.0 m messen.

An diesem Wwegabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006531353/history
hast Du die Einstufung von Path auf Track abgeändert und u.a. das Merkmal
- - access=agricultural
ergänzt.
Das halte ich ebenfalls für falsch.
Der Weg hat gem. Luftbild nur eine Breite von ca. 2.0 m und wird von landw. Fahrzeugen auch gar nicht benötigt.

Hast Du Bilder von den Wegabschnitten gemacht und kannst Dir das nochmal genauer anschauen?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Jürri (2022-09-28 07:45:32+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

die Merkmale motor_vehicle und track habe ich gemäß Deines Kommentars berichtigt. Die Breite des Weges stimmt aber mit 2 m, mein Rad passt, wenn ich es quer zum Weg stelle, mit ein bissel Luft zum Fahrbahnrand rein, und das Rad ist ca. 1,80m. Was man auf dem Luftbild nicht gut erkennt ist dass beidseitige Bankett aus wassergebundenem Kiesbelag mit einer jweiligen Breite von ca. 50 cm. Ich fahre das Stück öfter mit dem Rad, Bilder habe ich aber keine. Ich werde vielleicht am Wochenende die Route in eine Tour mit einbeziehen und nachmessen....und dann natürlich ggf. berichtigen.

Liebe Grüße
Jürri
PT-53 (2022-09-28 08:00:59+00:00): Hallo Jürri,
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Bitte schaue Dir bei Gelegenheit alle Wegabschnitte vor Ort genau an und achte dabei auf den genauen Standort der Verkehrszeichen. Da sind noch mehr Wegabschnitte mit zweifelshaften Merkmalen.

Grüße
Jürri (2022-09-28 08:18:57+00:00): Hallo,

das ist ein Geh-/Radweg, der von Edelbeuren bis Laubach durchgehend gleich ausgebaut ist und eigentlich auch die gleichen Anforderungen hat. Bei jeder Zufahrt stehen dann die beiden Verkehrszeichen 240 und 1026-36. Der Weg macht mir immer Probleme bei der Tourenplanung, weil da viel verschiedenes drinsteht. Meinst Du, dass es sinnvoll wäre, den ganzen Weg zu löschen und neu mit den Merkmalen

highway=track
access=agricultural
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=no
traffic_sign=DE:240,1026-36 

einzugeben? Dann wäre alles überflüssige und falsche weg...

Grüße retour
PT-53 (2022-09-28 08:22:59+00:00): Objekte löschen wird in OSM nicht gerne gesehen, da dann auch die Hystori verloren geht.
Bitte nur die Merkmale entsprechend anpassen.
Jürri (2022-09-28 08:36:24+00:00): alles klar....dann klemm ich mich dahinter, sobald ich wieder vor Ort war und mir das ganze genau angeschaut hab!

Schönen Tag....ciao
Jürri (2022-09-29 10:40:50+00:00): Hallo

War heute draußen vor Ort und hab mir alles angeschaut und entsprechend geändert...wollte Dir dahingehend nur Bescheid geben, dass es dann abgeschlossen ist. Bei der Wegbreite muss ich revidieren, ich hatte die ausgerechnet an der schmälsten Stelle bei der kleinen Baumgruppe gemessen, der Rest ist tatsächlich 2,50 breit....sorry

Einen schönen Tag und nochmals danke für deine konstruktive Kritik
Jürri
PT-53 (2022-09-29 11:01:29+00:00): Hallo Jürri, 
Danke für die Bereinigung und Rückmeldung.
Ich habe noch die Schreibweise für die Breiten-Angabe (Komma statt Punkt) berichtigt.
Grüße
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-28 06:13:25+00:00): This edit has been reversed and this is the second time you've made this wrong edit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117763743
Please be careful and know what to do before deleting something from the map!
cactolith (2022-09-28 10:14:47+00:00): It would be helpful to understand why a line is being used for such a large area that does not directly correspond to a sand area.  The line isn't closed and it only partially delineates the broad area of sand in the area, mostly southern Qatar.  Every other sand field is denoted by an area polygon labeled as sand.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-28 10:54:39+00:00): This sandy area is very large and crosses more than four countries, and it represents a large sandy area called الربع الخالي "the Empty Quarter" and it is within this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12037787
If you find an area inside that is not considered one of these sands, draw it as a way and then add it to the relation as an inner member:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
And If you use the JOSM editor it will be easier and better for you to edit such large places and complex Relation.
Regards