piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JochenOSM (2022-01-26 16:39:22+00:00): Hallo Boehner,
bist du sicher dass die Weinberge zwischen Miltenberg und Großheubach ebenfalls "Bischofsberg" sind? Oder ist der name= dort ein Copy&Paste Fehler?
Boehner (2022-01-26 19:38:47+00:00): Ja, da bin ich mir sicher. Weinbaurechtlich hat Großheubach nur eine Weinlage: "Großheubacher Bischofsberg". Sie umfasst sowohl den Bereich unterhalb des Busigbergs als auch unterhalb des Engelbergs.
Einzige Ausnahme könnte der Weinberg innerhalb der Klostermauern sein. Evtl. hat das Kloster eine eigene Weinlagenbezeichnung, das müsste man noch prüfen.
JochenOSM (2022-01-28 15:43:08+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Rückmeldung und natürlich für deinen Eintrag ;)
cyton (2022-01-26 00:33:55+00:00): I do have Images from this which i took while walking with my bike, though i feel uncomfortable uploading them since there are so many people on them and this is not a public road
SekeRob (2022-01-26 11:07:15+00:00): Hi,

new flag. You shared footway and building edges and probable added level=1 to overcome exit-save warning of the building-highway crossing. Can't do neither 2. BUT, if you cut up the building edges and add the footway tags you can, at least it wont generate that or duplicate edge warnings. Given the roof, that should be on level=1 I think, the new default, touch a roof without that tag and the wizard fires up to upgrade. Then the path can be returned to level=0 or rather no level as that is the default. Anyway, the footway along the grass is floating at level 1 so the next warning will be a '... long xyz without a bridge...'  ;O) I'll be happy to fix it for you, but how else can we learn but from our mistakes i.e. DIY. :O)))

ciao

ciao
n34s (2022-01-31 14:05:10+00:00): I think combining "highway" and "building" tags in way 1023471088 was not a good idea. I replaced building=roof with covered=yes and now the errors seem to have disappeared. 
However I don't know how else I could've represented all these areas in a meaningful way if I had left them disconnected or left a space between each of them. They must necessarily have common nodes. If, as you say, I cut the edges of a building, wouldn't I transform it from a polygon to an open line? Even in a multipolygon relationship such a change would result.
n34s (2022-01-31 14:05:33+00:00): In doubt, I try to inspect the area via iD so as to be able to better check the consistency of my data. It's not easy to find the right tags, in particular those that manage to give a certain area a certain graphic representation. I noticed that "landuse" (and probably "landcover" as well) renders more often on the map than "surface". Is it because "surface" is more suitable for use on paths than for areas/surfaces? Not surprisingly I notice that the highway-tagged areas are represented (almost) all in the same way and that they don't allow to distinguish their surface type in a visual way. Maybe I'm wrong or maybe I'm right, better ask the question now so as not to ask it later.
n34s (2022-01-31 14:06:10+00:00): I have better understood the placement of buildings on the ground and have, consequently, removed the "level" tags. The Cantina buildings are almost entirely on the same ground level as the east entrance, while the northern driveway surface (way 1023471089) is below the embankment on which almost all buildings rest. I had added the "level" tags with the intention of isolating the access of the internal walkable area from the northern driveway surface which are, in fact, on two different levels. I would've put "level=-1" on way 1023471089, but I think that barrier=wall between the two areas might serve the purpose better.
tastrax (2022-02-01 22:45:09+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
30asp (2022-02-02 11:25:03+00:00): Thanks tastrax. I'm still learning, so thanks for your guidance. Much appreciated!
tastrax (2022-02-02 22:01:59+00:00): No worries - I have been at it for years.... and still learning!
cserpell (2022-01-26 14:39:33+00:00): Estimado, gracias por las ediciones. Te comento que la posición de los edificios debe ser la base del edificio, no la parte más alta que se ve en la foto. Cada foto satelital muestra la parte más alta en una posición diferente por la proyección que tienen. Te sugiero probar distintas fotos de fondo en el lado derecho donde dice "fondo". Voy a arreglar eso.
jmty8 (2022-01-31 09:37:15+00:00): Hello TheKittenHuffer, could you give me a link to the ground truth of this huge tertiary road, that I can't see on the satellite? Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116607403
AgusQui (2022-01-26 03:39:56+00:00): Disculpame, ya te habia dicho que las relaciones de buses se mapean 1 por cada sentido, lo que hiciste con la linea 371 esta mal, ya vengo corrigiendo varios de esto errores, y ya te habia comentado como se hace.
MasonSellsFL (2022-01-26 14:56:16+00:00): Appears like a legit edit mixed with a fantasy edit. Strange, can not trust TheKittenHuffer
xkillah (2022-01-28 09:41:49+00:00): Почему вся территория базы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94898263 превратилась в здание?
puma515 (2022-01-26 03:09:27+00:00): Im Bereich Osterstedt, dabei habe ich die wikidata zur Hochspannungsleitung angepasst weshalb das changeset so groß geworden ist.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-06 23:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117097348, 117094894 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake edits and vandalising OSM.
marcoSt (2022-04-10 12:58:54+00:00): Hallo rms_GAON,

Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du eine 2. Haltestelle am Dorfener Marienplatz eingetragen hast. 

Weißt Du ob dort wirklich eine 2. Haltestelle steht? Wenn ja, wie verteilen sich die dort haltenden Buslinien? 

Kannst Du mir bitte deine aktuellen Ortskenntnisse teilen?

Vielen Dank im Voraus und ein schönes Restwochenende.

Viele Grüße

Marco
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-06 23:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117097348, 117094894 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake edits and vandalising OSM.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-06 23:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117097348, 117094894 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake edits and vandalising OSM.
MasonSellsFL (2022-01-26 14:18:44+00:00): Looks like another fantasy mapper cleaning up his fake edits. He or she seems to be making fake features, keeps them up for several days, and then deletes them. Looking through the edits it appears that the ones tagged as fix are the fantasy mapper restoring things to normal.

Fantasy mappers have been a problem in the area and one should keep an eye out for edits marked with seemingly random numbers.

I have been keeping watch on the SWFL area and have noticed a lot of strange edits in the Naples and Fort Myers area, please be vigilant about edits here.

Double check everything.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-06 23:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117097348, 117094894 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake edits and vandalising OSM.
MasonSellsFL (2022-01-26 14:12:38+00:00): Looks like the fantasy mappers struck again, classic hallmark of fantasy mappers around here to add fake features and then delete them later. The Kitten Huffer appears to have restored this area though ... so strange
5m4u9 (2022-01-26 20:17:15+00:00): Hola, todo bien y gracias por las ediciones. Lo que me intriga es porque borraste la casa del duende, ya no existe? lo derribaron? estaba hasta 2019.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
aleksaJov (2023-01-25 12:32:20+00:00): Hello,

I have noticed that are added ICAO code "YCDW" for airfield which is identical with Dallachy (Cardwell) Aerodrome (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666916119). Please, can you confirm which code is correct because it is on separated location?

Thanks,
Aleksandar
ElliottPlack (2022-03-07 17:13:57+00:00): Hi there, I see you've been busy adding and updated OSM pedestrian/bike infrastructure around Baltimore County. Thank you!! I am on OSM Foundation moderator with the Data Working Group and live right in Towson. You will certainly come across some of my edits as you're mapping. I just wanted to say hello. Let me know if you ever have any questions or need a review of something.

Hopefully someone has welcomed you to OSM, as I see you just joined. Welcome if not! What brings you to the project?

Thanks,  
Elliott
Glassman (2022-01-26 16:30:07+00:00): It looks like you added a building within a building. A better way would be to move Royal Buffet to a node, then add another node for the The Cupple Cakes Queen. Also, Cupple Cakes Queen needs a tag to describe the kind of business it is. Can you update your edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116609163
user_5359 (2022-03-08 10:21:29+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tags 
AAN=PANCHKHAL
DAS=0
DCODE=24
DDVDC=24062
RCODE=2
VCODE=62
WNO=9
ZONE=BAGMATI
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_5359 (2022-01-28 07:46:15+00:00): Hello! Please use for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
see http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=36.68421;118.48006;18
user_11435438 (2022-02-03 13:09:16+00:00): 你好。似乎这次修改主要是为了“纠偏”。然而实际上，修改之后使得路口整体偏移了。仅仅对照卫星影像进行“纠偏”是很容易发生问题的，卫星影像本身就存在不确定的偏移，即使是同一家的影像，在不同时期拍摄的都会有不一致的偏移。也许前人根据A家2020年的影像来描绘，后人根据B家2022年的影像来“纠偏”，这是没必要的，因为可能后者偏移更大也说不定。如果没有精确的定位数据，或者原本的地图数据没有明显的偏移（例如直路是弯的，建筑是平行四边形），最好不要进行“纠偏”。否则可能造成东一块往北偏移1米，西一块往南偏移2米的情况。宁可采用同一套偏移，也不要这样。对于这种不同偏移量的情况，主流编辑器都有手动对齐卫星影像的功能，可能将卫星影像根据当前路网来附加一套偏移。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116610155
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-03 13:36:49+00:00): 你好，本次纠偏是基于GPS轨迹的，并非基于底图。
user_5359 (2022-02-03 13:56:18+00:00): 你好！ 请明确使用英式英语作为键。 有关更多详细信息，请访问网站 http://wiki.osm.org。
见http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D %97%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22 %E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=36.68421;118.48006;18
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-03 14:13:45+00:00): @user_5359
Translated in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116966614
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_5359 (2022-01-28 07:01:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024745969. You add a way without any description.
maraf24 (2022-02-10 20:20:51+00:00): Drogi w budowie przecinają tu istniejące ciągi komunikacyjne.
maraf24 (2022-02-10 20:23:22+00:00): No i przekazanie placu to nie jest rozpoczęcie prac. Już się zdarzało, że po przekazaniu nic się nie działo przez miesiące.
Dodatkowo podane źródło nie jest odpowiednie, gdyż wprost stwierdza, że prac w zimie nie będzie.
GDM789 (2022-01-26 19:38:37+00:00): il 345a è il sentiero del botto dell'acqua
CAI Stabia (2022-01-26 20:42:19+00:00): É un refuso, é il345d ma in ogni caso non hai risposto alla domanda
GDM789 (2022-01-26 20:56:37+00:00): Non ho cambiato niente io su questo sentiero, ho solo fatto presente la cosa..
GDM789 (2022-01-26 21:00:20+00:00): Comunque sulla vostra mappa lo tenete segnato come 354a non 345d
JhowieNitnek (2022-01-26 17:45:25+00:00): Is this already in effect?
Thorum (2022-01-26 18:19:29+00:00): This road has always had a limited profile, and goodmove (where it was officially downgraded) is official policy for a few years now. Official plan for car hierarchy : https://mobilite-mobiliteit.brussels/sites/default/files/2021-08/Wegenspecialisatie_auto.pdf
tonyf1 (2022-01-28 21:24:04+00:00): Hi, the absence of signage indicating that bicycles are allowed is insufficient reason to to change it to a footway. What evidence do you have that its primary purpose is pedestrian?
HighRouleur (2022-01-28 21:28:47+00:00): As per previous discussion around the matter, we are mapping what's on the ground.
The Victorian rules state that cycling is only permitted where it is signed to do so, hence the absence of such sign means that it is not a shared path but rather a footway.
tonyf1 (2022-01-28 21:31:37+00:00): Hi
This is not my understanding, your edits were referred to the DWG and they made a ruling that did not support your position.
aharvey (2022-01-30 12:08:55+00:00): Hi Tony, HighRouleur, I'm investigating the dispute here with a fresh set of eyes.  @HighRouleur did you confirm this on the ground or is it based on a particular data source?
HighRouleur (2022-01-30 20:35:22+00:00): Hi Aharvey, yes I confirmed this on the ground as I rode this area a few days ago. We did not venture into the park as there were no signs indicating that we were permitted on bikes.
user_2066394 (2022-01-26 15:38:29+00:00): Kann man die Hausnummern nichtt mehr brauchen?
Jaiden1978 (2022-01-26 17:31:21+00:00): Die Hausnummern waren eigene Pubkte ohne Haus. Jetzt sind Hausflächen mit eigenen Hausnummern angelegt.
Dimacn (2022-01-29 06:14:19+00:00): Пожалуйста не придумывайте специально названия дорогам. Если это не улица и нет официального названия то в тег name ничего не пишите
seav (2022-01-26 22:09:50+00:00): Why place the node at this nondescript location along the river? Having the node at or near the Lawton area is the best place for this because this is beside the old city of Intramuros, almost adjacent to the city hall, and is the hub of various transportation routes that terminate in Manila.

Alternate locations that is much better than your preferred location would be Plaza Roma in Intramuros, or even near Km. 0 at Luneta.
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-28 16:26:15+00:00): I moved it specifically to Plaza Mexico as a compromise between Intramuros and Binondo.

With changeset 116714470, I moved it to Lawton Rd between the post office and Jones Bridge based on your input, but not further south so it'll still be close to both Intramuros and Binondo.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-26 20:28:34+00:00): Isn't the first place you'll think of Bacoor as the Zapote-Talaba-Niog area?
seav (2022-01-26 22:19:18+00:00): Compared to your Manila, LP, and P'que locations, this (Tirona-Aguinaldo junction) is actually a defensible place. But I kinda agree with TagaSanPedroAko here. The Bacoor junction seems like the more "downtown" area of the city, and an even central junction to various transportation routes. I generally prefer putting place nodes at the poblacion but I could be easily convinced that TagaSanPedroAko' preferred location is also good.
DP24PH (2022-01-27 02:44:42+00:00): This needs further attention with the LGU regarding the final "downtown" area, considering the population and transportation.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-27 04:50:18+00:00): @DP24PH It's more or less clear the Zapote-Talaba-Niog area is the ''de facto'' downtown, as the most built-up and the end of Alabang-Zapote Kabila. This edit moved the city node to around SM Bacoor, but to me, that isn't the best place as more busier area is Zapote-Talaba.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-27 04:57:09+00:00): @DP24PH Heto ka na naman. You're trying to help, but why go whole lengths to ask LGU? The issue is very simple: locate the node in Poblacion or busier area[s]? Panapaan is also busy with SM around, but I think it's Zapote.
DP24PH (2022-01-27 14:22:32+00:00): Hence, it is very unclear on where the node should be placed wherein I myself got confused already. :'(

Not sure if it is Panapaan, Zapote, or close to Bacoor Hall of Justice/Church as its poblaction/downtown, so it requires consensus.
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-28 16:18:51+00:00): Hi, TagaSanPedroAko, seav, and DP24. Sorry for the late response, but thank you for your inputs. I placed the city node back to the area near the intersection but further south (specifically at McDonalds) from the original node near the Zapote-Talaba border. Changeset: 116713894

I guess it all depends on perspective. If you're a native of Bacoor, you'll associate 'Bacoor' as the poblacion area, if you're from the cities south of Bacoor, you'll probably associate it near SM, if you're from Manila/north of Bacoor, you'll associate it near the Molino Blvd junction.
Temat-Droga (2022-01-26 08:09:11+00:00): Ciężko tu bronić secondary według mnie, jest to droga między miasteczkami.
maraf24 (2022-01-26 10:23:30+00:00): Zaprzestań tych edycji.
Temat-Droga (2022-01-26 10:27:20+00:00): ale czy ta droga ma JAKĄKOLWIEK predyspozycje na secondary poza oznaczeniem dw?
voltairovicz (2022-01-26 11:30:42+00:00): Droga ta łączy dwa niemałe miasta powiatowe, znam drogi wojewódzkie, które łączą ze sobą zwykłe wsie gminne, ruch nie jest powalający i jakoś nikt nie zmienia ich całych na tertiary
Temat-Droga (2022-01-26 11:31:55+00:00): Żmigród to nie miasto powiatowe...

Wołów za to jest małym miastem powiatowym więc no. 
I właśnie te przypadki wsi gminnych chce też zlikwidować.
seav (2022-01-26 22:04:07+00:00): I disagree with this movement. I'm a native of Las Piñas and the city hall compound is not as "central" or "important" as you may think. The poblacion area is culturally significant (Bamboo Organ Church) and is the centerpiece of the Las Piñas historic corridor.

As for Parañaque, the city hall location is even worse than your proposed Las Piñas' location which at least is along a major road. P'que's city hall is tucked inside a very residential area and is hardly the place where people think of when they hear "Parañaque". A place along Sucat Road would have been slightly better, but there's no obvious "central" place there. So the poblacion area, which is the cultural center of the city, and where the cathedral of the Diocese of Parañaque is located, where the Ospital ng Parañaque is located, and where major schools are found is a better choice.
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-28 16:10:20+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the input. Reverted with changeset 116713766.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_177389 (2022-01-26 10:31:03+00:00): Hello *Martin*,

please reconsider your approach. It is not enough to load relations to get the needed ways. Before cutting, you also have to load all the relations that use these ways. In the last few days, up to 20 relations were broken again and again because they were missing. It's not worth cutting administrative borders to map forest areas...

Best regards,
Mario
*Martin* (2022-01-26 10:35:25+00:00): Hi Mario.

I re-used country borders to split huge forests spanning both countries. What is your specific case which is affected by these changes?

Thank you.
*Martin* (2022-01-26 10:38:29+00:00): If some parts of the border were removed from the administrative reations by my changes then I really apologyze and next time will be more careful.
user_177389 (2022-01-26 11:09:59+00:00): latest example (less broken than other changesets):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182589465 was cut at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024775039

loaded relations:
2275510, 2275465, 946159, 388271, 388263, 14296 (because been intact)

forgotten relations:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116616206
*Martin* (2022-01-26 11:54:11+00:00): Thanks for fixing it. Next time I'll be more careful.
eggie (2022-01-26 11:37:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Aljan (2022-01-26 12:31:44+00:00): Bedankt! Ik ga het vanavond doornemen en heb me al aangemeld voor de Discord server.
eggie (2022-01-26 12:49:01+00:00): Oke.. Aljan.. Neus ook eens rond op het forum van OSM.
Dat is het platform waar de consensus ontstaat.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Je kunt jezelf toevoegen aan het draadje Wie wat waar..  
De school heb ik toegevoegd op de adresnode.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-01-26 11:44:37+00:00): Best lastig iets uit te lijnen met pdok. Ik heb wat aangepast mbv de BGT omtrekgericht.
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster, want het gebouw is daar nog steeds niet aangepast.
Bij periodiek updates komt de verkeerde vorm dan gewoon weer terug in OSM.
Doe je dat zelf.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=de%20Fledders%2014&resultOffset=0&objectId=1730100000023957&geometry.x=234610.06600257&geometry.y=565617.72500042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1730010000019404

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-26 11:56:33+00:00): Aljan, 
Adresnode 2a heb ik verwijderd.. School toegevoegd.
Aljan (2022-01-26 12:37:00+00:00): Goed punt, en direct wat geleerd. Ik heb een terugmelding gedaan aan het Kadaster.
Kovoschiz (2022-01-27 07:12:07+00:00): This is not "duplicated". You should update the `=coastline` shape according to them.
Kovoschiz (2022-01-27 07:16:20+00:00): Ok you fixed it.
benmkor (2022-01-28 05:58:44+00:00): Thanks @Kovoschiz
androidphgr (2023-04-22 12:04:19+00:00): Hello, could you delete this path, because people are passing through my garden.
THANKS Philippe
Jakka (2023-04-22 12:10:30+00:00): done CTRL+F5 to see
androidphgr (2023-04-22 21:23:21+00:00): Cool Thank's
Ropino (2022-02-28 11:46:20+00:00): Hallo, kleine Nachfrage zur Essener Straße in Höhe A448:
Ist diese in westlicher Richtung wirklich  "path" und keine "secondary" mehr?
VG
gmbo (2022-02-28 13:54:16+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis,
ist natürlich noch secondary, 
eigentlich hatte ich nur Radwege bearbeitet.
Habs wieder geändert.
Ropino (2022-02-28 14:17:51+00:00): Danke :)
eggie (2022-01-26 16:05:18+00:00): Dag Yvd B  Je hebt hier de fietsroute onderbroken en wegdele verwijderd??
Ietys is een tusnnel of een viaduct. Je hebt dus maar één van de twee. Niet eerst wegen verwijderen en er dan iets nieuws van maken. De historie gaat van verloren.
Je kunt toch gewoon het het betreffende wegdeel de max hoogte aangeven?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-26 16:11:46+00:00): reverted by changeset #116628610
eggie (2022-01-26 16:15:18+00:00): Even op m'n gemak bekijken hoe ik het hier oplos..