piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-03-13 21:40:12+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
odsuur (2017-03-14 20:08:49+00:00): Ik heb de voetpaden wat aangepast en ook De Jongstraat, zodat ze mooi aansluiten. Verder heb ik de tags van de voetpaden aangepast
eggie (2017-03-15 07:28:36+00:00): Mooi... kom zeker op het forumkijken. Je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
Je kunt keepright gebruiken om je edits na verloop van tijd te checken. http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=13&lat=52.07644&lon=4.93348&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
eggie (2017-03-13 21:42:25+00:00): Hier loopt wel een voetpad dwars door een schuurtje heen.
alphensebezorger (2017-03-14 18:00:07+00:00): 1. De naam van het bedrijf is verdwenen met het verwijderen van het gebouw. Kan de originele way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480200978) niet aangepast worden aan de BAG contour? [Keep the history]
2. Er staan nu twee adrespunten in het gebouw (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732087321). [One feature, one OSM element] De tag tourism=attraction lijkt me een mapsme-artefact, die mag wel weg.
3. De "Ossur Nemea, laden en lossen" node lijkt me de plaats aan te moeten geven waar geladen/gelost wordt bij het bedrijf Össur (EMEA). Kan die niet in een entrace-tag? Wissen lijkt me wat rigoreus. [Don't remove tags that you don't understand]
Tekst tussen vierkante haken komt uit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice.
XM1331 (2017-12-28 21:50:59+00:00): Looks like someone is referencing Ingress ;)
CeeMoGreen (2017-12-29 13:50:23+00:00): What do you mean?  I do play Ingress casually, but don't get many references.  I've been mapping longer than I've been playing.
XM1331 (2017-12-29 14:42:27+00:00): Ah, I saw this edit linked to "Founder's 50 Monument" which I only noticed thanks to it being a portal in Ingress. Also, just saying hi as a local Ingress player. The app has now switched to OSM for displaying its maps but it's still a few months behind.
CeeMoGreen (2017-12-29 16:02:54+00:00): I got ya.  Cool.  Yeah, Mainstreet and the park in Greenbrook are about the only 2 places I've really played played.  The Ingress and PoGo maps are both stuck on the cached version from early August.  We have started to get some new portals since OPR relaunched though!
eggie (2017-03-13 21:47:09+00:00): 'k heb je voetpaden iets aangepast.
odsuur (2017-03-14 18:34:16+00:00): Sorry Ik had niet gezien dat ze door het schuurtje liepen. Ben nog helemaal nieuw bij OSM. Ik heb nog een vraag; als ik nu de website  Openstreetmap.org open zie ik mijn veranderingen pas op het aller grootste detail. Ook hebben ze een andere kleur dan andere voetpaden. Hoe komt dat.?
groeten Odsuur
eggie (2017-03-14 19:00:59+00:00): Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. Alle begin is moeilijk. De rendering van osm.org heet de mapnik. Die rendert erg langzaam. De fietskaart doet er weken over. De humanitarian werkt nog het snelst. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.06496/4.91471&layers=H
Die kun je rechts instellen bij dat layersymbooltje.
Dat de footway anders rendert komt omdat je surface=paved hebt toegevoegd. Verder heb je het op access=no gezet en foot yes.
Voor een footway is dat niet nodig. needless tagging. Er routeert toch niets anders op een voetpad. Dat kan er dus af. 
Ga je die brandgangen mappen. (Dat wordt helaas ook gedaan) Zet er dan op acces=private  anders gaan ze hinderlijk routeren. Op de afgeleide kaarten routeren ze ook weer anders. Download maar eens de openfietsmap naar basecamp.
www.openfietsmap.nl
Haal je zelf de onnodige tags weg? Denk dat access=no de boosdoener is.
eggie (2017-03-14 20:52:10+00:00): foot=yes heb ik ook nog even weggehaald. Dat hoort niet nog eens op een voetpad.
chillly (2017-03-13 21:18:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM

What is this edit all about? Did you realise that you were saving to the live database? You seem to have a very odd group of tags and names for an urban part of UK.

Do you need some help with this edit? I can remove it for you if that is what is needed.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-13 21:56:13+00:00): It's not much of a plateau certainly - St Augustine's Road is very much a hill with the river at the eastern end of it, and the road that drops down to Queen's Park is likewise.
What exactly is it supposed to be?
lwsmsk20 (2017-03-14 15:15:25+00:00): Bäcker-Di ist geschlossen,ins Erbprinzenstraße 28 kommt neben Café Ettli nicht.
BCNorwich (2017-03-14 07:09:56+00:00): More details and better positioning would help.
EivindWAA (2017-03-15 14:11:23+00:00): Hi, when editing coastline pleas check the tool after 24 hours 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=9.27949&lat=58.72076&zoom=14

and fix issues like revers coastline
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480286623
Wulfmorn (2017-03-15 14:56:20+00:00): God idé!
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-03-14 10:04:26+00:00): Ciao,
ti inviterei ad inserire dei commenti al changeset sensati, da robe se passato a jkol :-) I commenti sono utili a chi fa monitoraggio nella mappatura. 
Grazie (e benvenuto su OSM se ancora non ti avessero salutato).

Alessandro
carciofo (2017-04-16 09:01:02+00:00): Hi & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your very detailed contributions! Just wanted to welcome you and invite you to visit the wiki page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org) where you can find additional information about tags. More specifically, the mapping of turning lanes as individual ways is discouraged in favor of using tags about lane information (turn:lanes, etc.) Turning lanes on major roads also don't qualify as residential roads as there's no residential buildings along them, so *_link is more appropriate in those cases. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions. Happy mapping!
chillly (2017-03-13 21:28:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You seem to have doodled a lot of types of stuff near Daniel Avenue. It is clearly a doodle, so I will revert (delete) it. You perhaps didn't realise your were saving to the live database.
naoliv (2017-03-14 20:42:56+00:00): Felipe, Pokestop não deve ser adicionado ao mapa.
Marcussacapuces91 (2017-03-19 08:31:14+00:00): geo:47.24765,0.96536?z=18
Ces îlots ne sont pas corrects au sens géométrique. IL faut faire des multi-polygones.

Merci
SomeoneElse (2017-11-23 23:39:10+00:00): Unfortunately it looks like you "corrected" self intersections in some Pokemon doodles here :)
chillly (2017-03-13 21:48:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM

I'm guessing this was an experiment. The park, the mosque and the cave entrance all seem unlikely.

I can help out if you need this reverting (undoing).
chillly (2017-03-13 22:02:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM

This is the second edit this evening adding a very strange plateau in this locality. Is this part of a course or a some other related group?

This really does not look valid for the area. I think both edits are likely to be removed.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-13 22:06:42+00:00): Unlike the other one, there probably is a bit of moraine under here (it's a raised bit west of the Rother and the clue's in the nae "Stonegravels") but ir's doesn't really belong in OSM as it stands.
What are you actually trying to do?
You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.
Best Regards,
Andy
Chieftl (2017-03-28 09:52:10+00:00): Добрий день
Точка, якій ви присвоїли ім'я "Тязів вулиця стефаника 21" призначена для характеристик цілого села, а не об'єктів села.
Поясніть, будь-ласка, що ви мали на увазі, десь там будинок з такою адресою?
Kevin Kofler (2017-03-13 22:51:52+00:00): You have added name:ko tags for 3 buildings to the public OpenStreetMap database. (Warning: Anything you save in MAPS.ME gets uploaded to the public database!) I do not speak Korean, but seeing the buildings (2 of which do not even have a name in German) and the Google translation of the name:ko tags you added, they do not look like the actual names of the buildings to me. Therefore, I reverted your changeset (see my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46825891 ) assuming it was probably a mistake. (If those really are the names of the 3 buildings, then I will restore them.) Please, in the future, only write text into name:ko that is actually the name of the building (or other object) in Korean.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-13 22:20:31+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
What are you actually trying to do here?
You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.
Best Regards,
Andy
chillly (2017-03-13 22:23:33+00:00): This follows a pattern. Whoever is coordinating this would be best to talk to someone in OSM (by adding a comment here or sending a direct message to me). These edits are likely to be deleted, they are not useful in OSM, so this work will be lost.
chillly (2017-03-13 22:25:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM

If this is a an area for children to play on equipment such as a slide, swings etc, you might be better to tag it as a playground rather than a park. Playgrounds are often an area in a larger park.

HTH
chillly (2017-03-13 22:26:35+00:00): Is this a park, or just a piece of grass? Everything that is green is not always a park.
PT-53 (2018-02-13 09:18:52+00:00): Hallo felkel1982,
gibt es diese Treppe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480300075#map=19/47.76106/9.63006 wirklich? Auf den Luftbildern ist jedenfals nichts zu sehen.
Auf jeden Fall ist die Treppe nicht korrekt mir der Straße Ittenbeuren verbunden (siehe keep right: https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=82368776)
.
Schaust Du Dir das bitte nochmal an?

Grüße
carciofo (2017-07-06 16:27:53+00:00): Hi, please double check your updates to this area. there are duplicate overlapping ways (e.g. 45397393 and 479917166). You also seem to have created intersections to a river and an administrative boundary. Please check that this is desired. Thanks in advnace!
nammala (2017-07-14 06:43:32+00:00): Hi Xandroph ,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding parks over the buildings which is not appropriate and OSM is the real map of the world every data we add should be ground truth not fantasy data.

Best Regards,
nammala
Felipe Alves (2017-03-15 15:58:30+00:00): Oi, Paulo! Vi que fez sua primeira contribuição, seja bem vindo ao OSM! Qq dúvida, não hesite em perguntar. ;)
Wulfmorn (2017-03-13 22:57:22+00:00): Well crap. That's the wrong description. Straightened corners of "Gullhaugveien 1-3 AS"-building. Moved it a bit (to fit correctly between the roads and added the service road going around to the back. Continued a footpath to a more natural conclusion. Based on Bing aerial.
Carlos Brys (2017-03-14 13:01:44+00:00): La abreviatura del nombre de la calle A. Ruiz, correspone a "Arroyo Ruiz" ?
zapasho (2017-03-14 13:54:34+00:00): Correcto, yo lo tenía como A? Ruiz, y le puse solo A. Ruiz por las dudas. Después me di cuenta que  el caracter ° no lo tiene y por eso salta el ? las siguientes que edité ya le puse completo...
zapasho (2017-03-14 13:57:31+00:00): Particularmente A. Ruiz desconozco, pero supongo corresponde a un nombre de persona, por las calles paralelas.
BCNorwich (2017-03-14 07:21:02+00:00): Removed fiction
Alexander-II (2017-03-14 01:34:05+00:00): Опять эта твоя категоричность:

Строения
Тег amenity=place_of_worship можно поставить как на область, в которой находятся весь комплекс строений и сопутствующей инфраструктуры, так и на здание. (на здание совместно с тегом building=*)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=place%20of%20worship?uselang=ru

В англоязычной вики так же.
literan (2017-03-14 09:02:09+00:00): Да, но не и туда и туда же! Получаются вложенные объекты. По аналогии со школами - все равно что ставить amenity=school и на территорию и на здание внутри этой территории. К тому же, полагаю, эта фраза скорее относится не к христианским, а, например, буддистским храмам - у них на территории полно всяких ритуальных штук.
Alexander-II (2017-03-14 09:09:39+00:00): А, ну, так да. Не подумал :)
marczoutendijk (2022-02-01 10:09:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480302665
surface=7 is puzzling. What should it be?
Joker234 (2022-05-29 19:18:13+00:00): Thanks, that was obviously wrong. Since I don't have any other source than my knowledge, I fixed it to “unpaved”, which I'm very certain of it is. Anyone else can fix it to a more precise value.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121675051
Maarten Deen (2017-04-25 14:15:12+00:00): Geen idee waarom je het fietspad langs de N275 bij Maasbree op oneway=yes hebt gezet, maar dit is natuurlijk géén eenrichtingsfietspad en dat kun je zelfs vanuit de luchtfoto's zien.
Ik heb het maar terug gezet.
Kogacarlo (2017-04-25 22:53:18+00:00): Inderdaad dat was fout. Bedankt voor de correctie.
Kogacarlo (2017-04-25 23:32:33+00:00): Jao det waar verkiérd. Bedank veur de correcsie ;-)
i29 (2017-03-15 07:40:04+00:00): А зачем луга, леса на территории парка удалили?
literan (2017-03-14 12:30:39+00:00): Здравствуйте! хочу сообщить, что прописывать адреса на точках банков, магазинов и т.п. POI - по сути ненужная работа. Навигаторы и пр. пользователи базы OSM берут их из контуров зданий, в которые попадают эти точки.
Som (2017-03-14 13:13:52+00:00): Хорошо, понял, спасибо!
BCNorwich (2017-03-14 06:58:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your changeset because all the tourism=attraction features you added are already mapped, (the tags are on the actual features). By the way you had made several spelling and capitalisation mistakes.
Regards
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 10:54:03+00:00): So from what I can tell, "Lighthouse Field State Beach" is the beach area, which should just be tagged as a beach. Then the rest of this park area is actually a few different things. Mainly an unamed park to the north of West Cliff Drive and then another area to the right of the beach. Which isn't really a park, but I have no problem with being tagged as one. Due to the grass. Although it should be its own separate area. Since it's clearly not a part of this big made up park complex you having mapped here. There defiantly shouldn't be two places overlapping each other both called Lighthouse Field State Beach as you currently have it. That's for sure.
stevea (2019-04-20 18:05:30+00:00): No, what you call "the beach area" is the "southern polygon" of this STATE PARK (what I and locals call it, the Department of State Parks and Recreation names the whole a State Beach, though only a small fraction of it IS beach), a very carefully constructed polygon made of of no less than eight ways and even other multipolygons due to its complexity.  It believed to be the legal delineation of the State Park jurisdiction/boundary, but it is absolutely NOT (as you assert) all beach.  So no, it should not be "tagged as a beach," except where it is.

Again, I hear no constructive criticism about how this might be better tagged (and you get wrong many facts about it and its history, reality and the correct tagging that exists here today), instead you assert "unnamed park" (false, it is part of the state parks jurisdiction) and seem to assert that "grass makes" (the Lighthouse area) a "park."  You are non-specific about exactly "what" should be a separate area; there are many "separate areas" tagged in this multipolygon, all believed correctly.  Posit a legitimate, specific proposal for improvement and the community will consider it.

Another false assertion of yours:  the area is not "made up," it (largely? recently? I haven't checked in a while) it derives from CPAD polygons (or should).  Read our county wiki.  And learn (by listening/reading what has existed for years).

You likely don't know the history of this, it was going to be converted into a giant resort hotel, but locals demanded it become a park, so it did.

You likely also don't know that there is a sliver of county beach, independent of the state beach (known as "Its Beach" with no apostrophe) where law enforcement by state park rangers about nudity (at Its, where nudity is legal) has tried to cite people for it (nudity is not allowed on state beaches but is widely practiced on Santa Cruz County beaches; OSM often tags this where the nudism tag is used).  The existing tagging is accurate as to where the boundary is; in 2012 I used a GPS on this beach to determine that this OSM-entered boundary quite accurately follows the sometimes rope-delineated boundary that the county and State Parks sometimes erect to show this.  Many beachgoers that day watched as I did this (as GPS was not common then) and later told me that rangers and sheriff deputies who were told of this accuracy wanted to know the source of the data.  "OSM" is what my friends told them.  Once again, OSM builds communities with accuracy and good tagging.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 02:26:16+00:00): I'm not going to parse through your needlessly long message at this point, but its still doubled tagged. There should only be one thing tagged as "Lighthouse Field State Beach." As there's only thing called that in real life. Remember the "one element one tag" rule or whatever it's called. I don't care if it's the beach or the park at this point. Although I think it should be the park name to go, but just get rid of one of them. Then we can continue figuring out the details of this is actually a park or not later, but at least there will be a slight improvement in data quality in the mean time.
stevea (2019-04-26 02:29:09+00:00): Anything that fits on one screen (and a narrow leftward column of it, at that) isn't "needlessly long."  Anybody (but you?) could agree to that, but, oh, yeah, you can't write something without being inflammatory, can you?

Map.  Express your thoughts in the data structures which make our map.  Paint the damn canvas, boy.  I'm damn tired of seeing your vomit word salad instead.
Gumeg (2017-04-27 10:53:37+00:00): А зачем вы адресные теги повесили на точку  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732194469?
Alexander-II (2017-05-02 14:18:51+00:00): Я только исправил значение поля addr:housenumber. Не стал сносить адрес с точки.
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-18 22:15:38+00:00): I reverted your change to 13 Wright Street where you put Chinese characters there.
Rps333 (2017-08-18 22:37:06+00:00): Why? Feel free to change the Chinese characters. But this is not Saints Peter. maybe local survey to see what in the building now. Cheers
Commodoortje (2017-03-14 03:50:44+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
zapasho (2017-03-14 12:58:12+00:00): Alteré involuntariamente unas cuantas relaciones de las líneas de colectivos por unir segmentos de una misma calle. Apenas puedo corrijo.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-17 08:28:36+00:00): Hi EzekielT, please follow the OSM wiki (wikipedia="lang:Name"). see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Thanks, Alex
manoharuss (2017-03-17 06:17:27+00:00): Hi Blackruby,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have given place=city tag to offices. These 3 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4733251810/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4733251766/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4733252540/history. You probably want to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Doffice and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dgovernment. 

Can you correct your edits?

Best,

Manohar
vramirez122000 (2017-03-14 20:12:00+00:00): This changeset carelessly spoiled the geometry of Calle 17, Bayamón, Puerto Rico. I am reverting this changeset. Please refrain from editing until you at least respond to this comment so that we can discuss what you are attempting to do
BigKev97 (2022-12-05 14:24:27+00:00): Sorry.
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-19 15:38:25+00:00): for minigolf, please use leisure=miniature_golf, not leisure=golf_course
mbethke (2017-03-15 02:47:32+00:00): Whether it's true or not, this is not the place to take it out. Changeset reverted.
Fortepc (2017-03-14 04:30:36+00:00): This is the second time I've tried to update things in this changeset, feel free to ask me why I changed certain things, but I have lived in the area and know have updated information to be as accurate as I know from being on the ground.
Alexander-II (2017-03-14 05:15:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Позвольте поинтересоваться, какой источник названия парка? В поисковиках и в атласе Москвы он упоминается как Народный парк "Чермянка" http://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=7&ll=37.638123663246866%2C55.867222250194935&o=4331919
literan (2017-03-14 12:21:49+00:00): Я откатываю эту правку, гугл его не знает, парк нарисован поверх уже существующего
literan (2017-03-14 12:20:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы поверх уже имевшегося мультиполигона парка зачем-то создали еще один, дублирующий. Также вы присвоили ему название "парк на Заповедной", которое гугл не знает. В связи с этим вашу правку я откатываю.
Supaplex (2017-04-07 15:48:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
vramirez122000 (2017-03-14 20:21:23+00:00): Why did you change all these streets from "Calle" to "Avenida"?
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:40:48+00:00): Because some people are mostly using the name of the streets because is mostly in common.
mavl (2017-03-14 17:25:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы обозначили здание детского сада просто как некоторую территорию area=yes. Здание нужно отмечать как здание, например building=yes.
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building]
mavl (2017-03-14 17:52:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Возле дома № 8 по улице Маяковского действительно проходит велодорожка длиной всего 186 метров? Здесь, вероятно, обычный проезд.
Отодракула (2017-03-14 18:52:26+00:00): Да обычный проезд
mavl (2017-03-15 17:43:39+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Если это проезд, то почему вы переобозначили велодорожку в улицу (highway=residential)? Проезд это highway=service.  
Вам вчера была дана ссылка на обозначение объектов. Там это описано.  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Объекты_карты]
Spanholz (2017-03-14 15:07:59+00:00): I edited your footways.  Footways that cross each other should be connected, otherwise there will be no routing along them.