piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 04:18:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Allison P (2022-04-14 06:41:35+00:00): I'm a little embarrassed. Not sure how it happened.
Rhodez (2022-04-14 17:35:41+00:00): I think it was an automatic thing that iD did. No worries.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
skquinn (2022-05-22 15:26:13+00:00): Hi,

Please note that in OpenStreetMap road names are always spelled out e.g. "Berkeley Avenue" not "Berkeley Ave", "Gibralter Lane" not "Gibralter Ln" etc. Abbreviating and misspelling road names *does* cause problems with real world use of data, in particular OsmAnd will show the abbreviated/misspelled version as a different road.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
AgusQui (2022-08-15 05:07:43+00:00): un edificio de una estacion de tren simplemente se etiqueta con building=train_station, con eso ya queda indicado lo que es. public_transport=station se usa si hay servicios de pasajeros, railway=station se usa si la estación esta operativa (cargas y/o pasajeros). Por favor no seguir siegamente las recomendaciones de etiquetado de iD, usar el criterio.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-17 08:34:02+00:00): features should be mapped as they are on the ground not just the parts visible on aerial imagery
Flubber_00 (2022-05-17 21:08:15+00:00): I did map them the way they were on the ground.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
wermak (2024-10-01 23:26:05+00:00): Bei Kreisverkehren braucht es keine Abbiegebeschränkungen. Habe diese wieder entfernt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14037923/history.
pd8JUHyoPJ (2024-10-02 03:00:03+00:00): Danke - ist richtig - war so ne Altlast von mir...
user_5359 (2022-04-15 12:53:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686101562. Did mean highway instead of roadway?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-14 22:31:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 04:41:51+00:00): wrong description: remove wiki:symbol=t.b.d. add fixme
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-14 12:09:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4526608235/history

Czy dodanie not:brand:wikidata=Q62073490 bez usunięcia brand:wikidata=Q62073490 było zamierzone?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
lyctkel (2022-06-19 18:58:43+00:00): Hi Leila Maritim,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850086156 which uses building=yesm.
This tag is only used here and looks like a typo to me.
From my point of view building=yes would fit better.
Regrads,
lyctkel
abakus_uploader (2022-04-14 22:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-04-18 02:04:26+00:00): а расположение точное?
Mixon (2022-04-18 08:51:31+00:00): Здымаў каардынаты двумя рознымі прыладамі з месца.
4004 (2022-04-19 22:49:10+00:00): супер, дзякуй
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_11609320 (2022-04-14 05:44:29+00:00): The exact routing is on their v-line live bus android app. Not sure how I would indicate that as a source
ovruni (2022-04-14 08:22:00+00:00): Hola Camila Anais Urquiso Andia, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados, solamente se indica "#osmpe-unmsm-comaru". Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Fluffy Basil (2022-04-23 15:52:14+00:00): Heya, any reason why you created a duplicate entry for this massage shop?
Fluffy Basil (2022-05-01 09:43:14+00:00): I have merged them now
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mrpulley (2025-12-13 10:31:47+00:00): Mitchell Highway maxspeeds correct
Spring Grove Road not checked.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 03:24:45+00:00): Hello.
Please don't put promotional/advertising text in changelog messages. Such text is useless in trying to understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119695636
fabiotofy (2022-04-15 06:12:40+00:00): ciao, in realtà tutta la piazza è pedonale. Non vi sono dei percorsi lineari delimitati nelle posizioni da te evidenziati. Io toglierei
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119695992
MV Soft (2022-04-15 06:25:22+00:00): Ciao, i due attraversamenti della piazza sono stati inseriti per poter generare route migliori per i navigatori che non supportano l'attraversamento di aree pedonali, ma solo la percorrenza del perimetro, es. graphhopper
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 06:54:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Ces modifications n'ont aucun sens : transformation d'une rue en arrêt de bus. 
Par conséquent, je les ai annulées : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119737921

Merci de ne pas détériorer les données existantes dans OpenStreetMap.

~~
laurent-38
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 07:28:12+00:00): Merci pour cet ajout.

Néanmoins, il aurait fallu préciser la source utilisée pour apporter ces modifications  (vu sur le terrain ? connaissance locale ? site web ?). 

Et, je trouve que le commentaire sur le changeset est trop subjectif. OpenStreetMap n'est pas le lieu pour attribuer des notes à des établissements. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications 

J'ai rajouté quelques détails : voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119738913

Cordialement
~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 07:45:16+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour cet ajout.

Néanmoins, quelques remarques :
- attention aux maladresses comme le déplacement de l'arrêt de bus « Place de la Chaite ». Je l'ai corrigé (voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119739270) 
- Sur les ajouts, merci de soigner la typographie ("auto école plaisir" => "Auto-école Plaisir")  et si possible rajouter des détails sur l'objet ajouté. Je l'ai fait pour l'auto-école : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9665104757

Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 10:21:19+00:00): Thanks, but please don't delete it directly. It still exists in reality. Remove the name only.
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 08:18:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a trop de choses incohérentes dans cet ensemble de modifications, notamment du coté de Villefontaine/La Verpillière : transformation parking vélo en restaurant, déplacement agence immobilière, etc.

La seule modification qui est pertinente est l'ajout du terrain de foot à Chavanoz.

J'ai tout annulé ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119740556 ), merci de refaire l'ajout du terrain de foot dans un groupe de modifications restreint, sourcé, et avec un commentaire utile.

~~
laurent
Syl (2024-06-10 08:09:58+00:00): J'ai annulé la suppression du terrain de foot (et corrigé son tracé).
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 08:33:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Les attributs pour le « parcours de santé » sont incohérents et/ou inadaptés. Voir la documentation  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:route%3Dfitness_trail .

Ou peut-être suffit-il de dire qu'il y a un panneau d'information ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dboard )

Es-tu en mesure d'améliorer cela ?

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Mike_citadin (2022-04-18 17:29:43+00:00): Bonjour Laurent, je prend le secteur en main. Je vais aller sur place prendre des relevés car les chemins sont à corriger et de nombreux éléments sont à créer.
Bonne journée, Mickael
laurent-38 (2022-04-19 15:13:54+00:00): Merci Mickaël
~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 08:45:15+00:00): Ensemble de modifications annulé, car trop d'incohérences :
- déplacements de points inopinés
- suppression de numéros de rue.

Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119741406#map=15/45.6517/5.0127.

Les modifications sur l'étang ont été annulés par Al-Hun (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/39007649)

~~
laurent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
laurent-38 (2022-04-15 08:03:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Ces modifications sont incohérentes et non sourcées (voir par exemple l'historique du nœud adresse "52 rue du lac" https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2501425369 )

En conséquence, je les ai annulées : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119740000

Cordialement
~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2022-04-14 07:22:04+00:00): Bonjour carto2021,

je ne vois pas la maison https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051749474 sur aucune imagerie aérienne.

Peux-tu confirmer qu'elle existe réellement ? 

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Lejun (2022-04-14 10:31:09+00:00): Et en profiter pour enlever la clé `name` qui n’a pas lieu d’être. L’attribut `building=house` suffit à ça et si par le plus grand des hasards il y aurait « maison » d’écrit explicitement alors c’est la clé `inscription` qu’il faut utiliser.
Syl (2024-06-10 07:56:05+00:00): Je viens de corriger la maison avec les dernières images aériennes.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-14 22:31:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
bernardo60 (2022-04-15 02:53:03+00:00): From the Indonesian tagging guideline: "For alleys that can only be passed by a motorcycle (<1.5 meters) please use highway=path." This is too narrow to call it a Living Street.
4004 (2022-04-18 02:05:57+00:00): серьезно, это я наугад попал?
Mixon (2022-04-18 08:50:45+00:00): Так. Усё норм - правяраў. Калі недакладнасць і ёсць, то у межах пагрэшнасці GSP на звычайнам тэлефоне.
user_5359 (2022-04-15 16:29:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051751646. I do not believe that the frequency bands of the individual communication methods belong in the keys. Nor does the statement whether you have validated your information not belong in the key. Please clean up this flood of information.
ovruni (2022-04-14 08:25:16+00:00): Hola Alexander Mateo Cartagena, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados, solamente se indica "#osmpe-unmsm-comaru". Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Por otra parte, varios de los edificios que ha agregado no son visibles desde las imágenes aéreas, por lo que los he retirado.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Mevess (2022-04-14 08:40:35+00:00): Bonjour,

Le parc existe déjà sous le nom de Jardin public des trois sapins (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247452797)
Si le parc est ouvert tout le temps l'attribut opening_hours=24/7 sera préférable

Bonne carto à vous !

Mevess
MxxCon (2022-04-15 03:37:10+00:00): Hello.
A company with "deli grocery" in its name is a "financial advisor"?🤔 That doesn't seem correct. Could you please elaborate on your edit? Where did you get this data from?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119698807
gscholz (2022-04-15 06:09:13+00:00): HI,
I had to revert this changeset as it created a huge mess of intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=106.82409&lat=-6.31703&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119698988

Please be more careful if you try again.

Kind regards
Guido
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 09:48:56+00:00): Please check `placement=` and `*:lanes=` tagging. There is nothing to fix here.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 09:49:33+00:00): Do not simply "beautify" things. You have to consider the reality of separation, and functionality of merging and diverging.
AWX4 (2022-04-15 04:39:09+00:00): ok got it.
dropped (2022-04-24 04:03:09+00:00): Hi,  noticed the update - the roads updated are the temporary construction roads only - they won't be part of any permanent development and are not maintained.  I had marked them as tracks - is this correct ?  thanks
emo_sami (2022-04-24 08:00:33+00:00): Hello rocky24;
Thank you for your notice,
the "track" is A minor land-access road like a farm or forest track,
and in this case, It is better to be mapped as an "unclassified" highway.
Here are links to OpenStreetMap Wiki for classifications;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Regards
emo_sami
Juan Carlos G F (2022-05-19 20:23:28+00:00): Hola, te escribo para preguntarte sobre un grupo de nodos que quedaron sueltos.
Formaban parte por lo que veo de un "landuse=forest" no se si modificaste la geometría y se quedaron sueltos.

Por si puedes echarle un ojo cunado puedas. 
Un saludo.
Juan Carlos G F (2022-05-19 20:23:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9665373596
Jesús Gómez (2022-05-19 20:31:29+00:00): Hola Juan Carlos. En cuanto pueda lo echo un vistazo.
Gracias por el aviso.
czubi (2022-04-14 13:40:56+00:00): Moin, was soll diese Kombi bedeuten? Weg und Mülleimer?
letsridebikes (2022-04-14 09:10:07+00:00): Wrong changeset comment, apologies - should be "tagged sections of A38 with no cycle lanes"
MxxCon (2022-04-15 03:43:30+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete an already mapped node and instead add similar info to another node?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119702486
user_5359 (2022-04-15 04:44:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use building=yes instead of yes=building
user_5359 (2022-04-14 11:11:36+00:00): Hello! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2565648228 over 100 meters, please check the position.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 11:39:14+00:00): Moved back to the original poition! You are welcome.
Minh Nguyen (2023-04-22 17:06:43+00:00): Hi, as you redraw roads to be dual carriageways, please remember to align the imagery layer you’re using with other features in the immediate vicinity of your edits. In this changeset, for example, the surrounding roads and other features had been aligned to a high-resolution imagery layer (OSIP 6in), so your edits based on Maxar imagery created a rather significant kink in the road that could have affected routing.

In iD, open the Background panel and scroll to the bottom, where you can adjust the Maxar layer’s offset. For best results, find a point feature that you can see in both the older, high-resolution imagery and the newer, low-resolution imagery (such as trees or crosswalks) and make sure that feature aligns with both layers.

Thanks for your attention to detail as you update these roads.