piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Ivor Švihran (2016-12-10 03:22:57+00:00): S výnimkou magistrátu uvádzajú všetky zdroje, teda mestská časť Rača (https://www.raca.sk/zoznam-ulic/), Kataster, Adresné body, Topografický lexikón, dokonca aj na stránke magistrátu sa všetky použitia názvu viažu len na Knižkovu dolinu, preto sa domnievam, že Knižková cesta je len preklep, je si to však potrebné overiť. Dovtedy navrhujem, aby sa používal opäť zaužívaný názov Knižkova dolina.
lucy147 (2016-12-11 16:30:38+00:00): to je sice pravda, ze vsetci pouzivaju K. dolina -  ale problem je tu: existuje nieco ako oficialne nazvoslovie ulic v BA vydane v roku 1993 - ktore je este stale zavazne !!!! Nikdy nebolo zmenene, nazov ulice sa moze zmenit iba po schvaleni zmeny nazvu na magistrate BA Vsetci (kataster, adresne body...) vsetci uvadzaju zdroj MC RAca, t.j. nazov Knizkova dolina, ale to uvadzaju iba kvoli starym Racanon a ich tlakom na MC, ten nazov je desatrocia zauzivany v MC ale nikdy nebol oficialne zmeneny, t.j. plati to co je uvedene v dokumente z roku 1993 a  tam je uvedene Knižkova cesta. Je mi luto ale to je spravne. MC by mala oficialne poziadat o zmenu nazvu. Inak je to stale Knizkova cesta. Nazov tej publikacie Vam viem napisat zajtra, ked pridem do prace, lebo doma ju nemam.  Lucia Velcicka
lucy147 (2016-12-12 07:24:32+00:00): dobry den, nazov publikacie: Zoznam ulic a uzemne clenenie hlavneho mesta SR Bratislavy podla urbanistickych obvodov, bratislava 1993, RNDr. Babiar Michal a kol.
aceman444 (2016-12-13 19:19:22+00:00): NO magistrat stale uvadza Knizkova cesta http://www.bratislava.sk/ulice%2Dv%2Dmestskej%2Dcasti%2Dbratislava%2Draca/d-11042603/p1=11050131 . Co tak pouzit aj 'name' aj loc_name alebo alt_name nech su vsetci spokojni?
lucy147 (2016-12-14 07:25:39+00:00): dobry napad, pouzite obe mena, vlk zasyteny aj ovca cela
mavl (2016-12-07 12:35:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
В этом пакете правок вы добавили три ограничения движения. Вместо трёх ограничений "Движение прямо запрещено", "Движение налево запрещено" и "Разворот запрещён" можно было бы поставить одно ограничение "Движение направо" (вы сами написали в комментарии к пакету правок "Сплошная, поворот только направо"). Чем меньше ограничений, тем проще разбираться в карте. 
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
maraf24 (2017-01-03 00:00:17+00:00): Deleting a road is hardly a fix...
joelmatos (2017-01-03 00:06:52+00:00): Thanks. Something must have gone wrong when i try to fix...
luschi (2016-12-19 23:12:11+00:00): Hallo Attila194,
die Hausnummer 25f die du hier eingetragen hast ist bereits in unserer Datenbank vorhanden. Ebenso ist tourism=attraction bei einer Hausnummer falsch.
Somit habe ich die Hausnummer wieder entfernt.
Ich weiß dass du bereits darauf hingewiesen wurdest, die richtigen keys zu verwenden.       
Bitte halte dich an die Vorgaben unserer Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen       
Du kannst dich auch direkt auf unserer Seite(www.osm.org) anmelden und hier die Daten ändern, denn maps.me ist in seinen Funktionen beschränkt.     
So kannst du beispielsweise Satellitenbilder verwenden die dir das erfassen/bearbeiten erleichtern.
lg
maraf24 (2017-01-03 00:01:05+00:00): ...and recreating without the name had made addressing problems.
Fixed.
joelmatos (2017-01-03 00:08:54+00:00): kk thanks
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BCNorwich (2016-12-07 16:40:27+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted this changeset in order to put back into its original place a footpath that was inadvertently moved.
naoliv (2016-12-07 18:15:31+00:00): Diretor, alguns nomes que você alterou eu obtive do próprio mapa da UFSCar.
Nesse caso, por exemplo, o nome no mapa estava como "Departamento de Transporte", com a sigla "DeTrans"
O nome foi alterado ou o local é conhecido como "Garagem", apesar de oficialmente ter o nome de "Departamento de Transporte"?
Diretor77 (2018-02-21 14:36:36+00:00): nessa edificação funciona a Seção de Vigilância e garagem de veículos oficiais
naoliv (2018-02-21 14:37:42+00:00): A seção de vigilância, apesar de não aparecer o nome no mapa, está representada aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4051602207
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 15:44:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46234707/history - skąd ta nazwa drogi?
vani_paru (2019-04-01 01:24:13+00:00): "Hi Helmchen42,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across 
way 458267064
way 458267070
way 458267083
way 458267065 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
Helmchen42 (2019-04-02 17:24:36+00:00): Yeah, =residential should be correct, though #070 and #083, at least the southern part, might be debatable. #083 also seems to continue to the north - but I am just an armchair mapper from overseas :D
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432558 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44233403 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Self-Perfection (2016-12-08 18:42:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. С первой правкой вас! 

Вы в этой правке поставили точку, дали ей название и адрес, но чем именно является этот объект, его тип, не указали. Я обозначил согласно комментарию к вашей правке его как shop=cosmetics Также проставил время работы + мелочи:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44263851

Если вы просто не нашли как обозначить магазин косметики, то имейте ввиду на будущее страницу в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить - сводный список самых частоупотребимых обозначений.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432505 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44233668 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mueschel (2016-12-09 22:07:12+00:00): Hi,
these 6 nodes don't have any physical tag, like amenity or shop. Just the name is not enough to be useful in OSM. Could you update them?

Jan
mueschel (2016-12-10 12:24:48+00:00): Hi,
could you explain all those ways? They have no common OSM tags, and seem not to match anything on the ground. 

Jan
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432276 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44233966 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:47:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sebastic (2016-12-13 19:02:03+00:00): Bergen heet "Bergen L" in de BAG, dat is zodoende de officiele naam.

De gemeente moet de naam aanpassen in de BAG als ze van L af willen.
sebastic (2016-12-13 19:00:24+00:00): Afferden heet "Afferden L" in de BAG, dat is zodoende de officiele naam.

De gemeente moet de naam aanpassen in de BAG als ze van L af willen.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mds878 (2016-12-07 12:57:41+00:00): カーナビ音声を参考に位置を決めて入力されているということでしょうか？そうであれば、このデータは全て削除しなければならなくなります。
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432274 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44234360 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Palolo (2023-01-05 17:01:24+00:00): Do you have more information on this point? It seems that a secondary teacher's house is not a police station? There aren't any buildings in this area that would indicate a school.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432174 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44234476 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:25:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432119 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44234554 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fkv (2018-02-14 09:25:03+00:00): Was sind "Tryhel" und "Kraut Soßen", und bist du dir sicher, dass die so geschrieben werden?
Hendric Stattmann (2018-02-14 11:53:30+00:00): Hallo!
Diese Ortsteil- und Riedenbezeichnungen habe ich basierend auf historischen Karten (public domain) beim Perchtoldsdorfer Weinbauverein eingepflegt und diese auch mit einem örtlichen Weinhauer verifiziert.
Sollte also passen.
marc__marc (2019-04-17 09:15:38+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux dire la clef class:bicycle:commute=2 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Raphaël Chapalain (2019-04-24 07:13:41+00:00): Bonjour !

Il s'agit d'une note attribuée de "cyclabilité" ie à "quel point c'est confortable d'emprunter cette route à vélo" sur une échelle qui va de -3 à +3. Plus d'infos ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle ! Nous avons renseigné ces notes sur le mode de "carto parties" en petit groupe d'usagers du vélo et sous l'initiative de l'asso Trégor Bicyclette.
marc__marc (2019-04-24 10:53:21+00:00): Merci, j'ignore pourquoi je ne l'avais pas trouvé sur le wiki.
et donc concrètement, quel critère permet de définir que ce tronçon est nettement mieux que les autres ayant le même genre de tag pour un trajet de style transport https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402390503 ?
Raphaël Chapalain (2019-04-24 13:27:43+00:00): Parce qu'il s'agit d'un tronçon sur lequel la piste cyclable est séparée des voitures !

Globalement les critères pour donner une bonne note étaient : séparation physique avec les voitures + faible vitesse et faible intensité du trafic routier.
KKS (2016-12-08 23:16:49+00:00): Вітаю.
Я вже неодноразово правлю за вами помилки по Східній Україні. І на думці лише одна фраза з мульту: "Гей руденький, схаменись! Не пустуй і зупинись! Там де ти чекай біду, час вже братись долад-у-у-у" :)
Ви мапите багато доріг типу unclassified чи residential, але після вашого мапінгу утворюються їх острови. До кожної з цих доріг має бути доступ рівнозначною чи вищою по класу. Доступ до новонамапленої residential через service з усією іншою дорожньою мережею - неможе бути.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431893 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44234744 because there was a problem with licence of data use
freebeer (2018-10-27 13:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63927779 where the changeset comment is: delete a bogus maps.me personal home castle
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-05-07 15:58:38+00:00): Na osm nie znaznaczamy planów. ""teren pod możliwą budowę"? Coś takiego nie ma prawa się pojawić.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431743 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44235033 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 20:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431411 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
opendcc (2016-12-07 15:59:39+00:00): Hallo,

die Brücke macht jetzt einen ziemlichen Bogen - beim Drüberfahren hatte ich noch nie den Eindruck ...

Was ist passiert: die Oberflächenentzerrung scheitert bei Bauteilen, die hoch über Grund liegen und das wird dadurch verzerrt. Sieh dir mal die Mangfallbrücke auf der BAB M-Szbg an. Und lade mal verschiedene Sat-Hintergründe - ist ganz interessant. 

Servus Wolfgang
Karsten Natebus (2016-12-08 16:13:18+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
ich bin die Brücke heute noch einmal abgefahren. Für mich macht diese in Fahrtrichtung Wasserburg einen Linksbogen.
Als Hintergrund habe ich mal die Bayern 80 und Bayern 2m gewählt, bei beiden sehe ich auch einen starken Linksbogen.

Gruß Karsten
opendcc (2016-12-08 17:20:08+00:00): Hallo,

Linksbogen ist okay. Aber der bleibt im Krümmungsverlauf konstant. Auf Bayern 2m sieht man unten die Fundamente, oben ist die Brücke verzerrt. Wirf mal einen Blick auf die Traunbrücke nördlich - und schalt mal um auf Bing - da ist es noch fehlerhafter, allerdings in die andere Richtung. Ich glaube, der momentane Mapzustand stimmt ganz gut.

Servus Wolfgang
Karsten Natebus (2016-12-08 17:40:46+00:00): Hallo, von mir aus kann es so bleiben. Das Bing-Bild wurde bestimmt bei einem Beben aufgenommen. Das ist vollkommen verzerrt.
Gruß Karsten
opendcc (2016-12-08 18:09:20+00:00): Hallo,

das hat nichts mit Beben zu tun. Es ist simple Geometrie: wenn das Foto nicht exakt senkrecht aufgenommen ist, dann blickt man schräg auf die Erde. Und je nach aktueller Höhe muß man das Bild dann verzerren, damit die Objekte an die richtige Stelle kommen. Das hängt von der Güte der Höhendaten ab (darum ist hier auch Bayern 2m besser als Bing). Bei einer Brücke hat man die Höhendaten vom Grund, darum verzieht es scheinbar den Brückenaufleger - und je nach Aufnahmerichtung mal so, mal so.

Servus Wolfgang
Nakaner (2016-12-09 12:08:02+00:00): Hallo Karsten,

bitte informiere Dich über die technischen Fehler, die bei der Erstellung von Luftbildern entstehen können. Im Wiki werden sie in einer Anleitung zum Thema Gebäude erklärt, die zwar für Potlatch geschrieben wurde, aber auch für andere Editoren wie JOSM verwendet werden kann.

Besonders eindrücklich sind die Verzerrungen an der Schnellfahrstrecke Hannover–Würzburg auf den hohen Talbrücken zwischen Kassel und Fulda, u.a. die Fuldabrücke Morschen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.0685/9.5839). Die GPS-Tracks dort sprechen eine eindeutige Sprache. Von der DB für OSM unter einer freien Lizenz bereitgestellte Streckenachsen (http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/2016-March/000434.html) ebenfalls.

Was ich hier über Bahnstrecken schreibe, gilt genau so auch für Straßen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:44:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431313 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431312 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431309 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431262 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
DaxServer (2016-12-07 14:27:27+00:00): FYI, there is no county named "Krishna", but just a "state_district". May need to remove county tag for this node.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44431163 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44430952 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44430943 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
tyr_asd (2016-12-10 20:12:39+00:00): Hi! Danke für die vielen Korrekturen. Könntest du evtl. aber bitte in Zukunft etwas aussagekräftigere Kommentare zu deinen Bearbeitungen angeben (statt nur wie hier: "ok")? Das würde Anderen helfen deine Änderungen besser zu überblicken und zu verstehen. Danke!
arcanma (2017-01-11 18:40:03+00:00): l percorso 458294878 (vineyard) ha un tratto che interseca se stesso, sarebbe da correggere. Grazie.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 19:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44430582 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-21 15:47:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4543264788/history has shop = bar that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=bar? Is it even a shop? Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar was meant here?
Giblet (2024-10-21 16:49:28+00:00): It looks like that feature does correctly have amenity=bar on it as well. It is possible that this location was also a shop, given what I remember of the area, however, I can't confirm that.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 18:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44429304 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
FreedSky (2017-01-24 09:56:16+00:00): 你修改了 日本人不会修改吗？
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 18:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44429875 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
M!dgard (2017-01-08 20:17:23+00:00): Door een tekortkoming in de iD-editor wordt een weg die getagd is als "fietspad in aanbouw"* getoond als "weg". Ik zal dit proberen aan te passen in de software. Gelieve het fietspad ondertussen niet van "weg" te veranderen in "fietspad" (tenzij wanneer het opengesteld wordt natuurlijk).

* OSM werkt met tags. iD abstraheert die weg om bewerken gemakkelijker te maken.
Wulfmorn (2018-10-13 09:38:11+00:00): Hello. It seems you have added the unusual value "lit=1" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244468018. I hope you can fix this.
Andrzej3345 (2018-10-15 11:21:41+00:00): Thanks for comment. Should be =yes of course. Already fixed
Alecs01 (2016-12-10 16:00:32+00:00): Hi and thanks for the additions on the map, but please do not duplicate objects, Ponte Vecchio for example already exists, and it has a korean name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5342094
ts_kanth (2019-03-06 14:36:02+00:00): Hi Samely,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the nodes from node 2269411688 till node 6295505008 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
mueschel (2016-12-09 22:04:05+00:00): Hi,
do we really need tags like these in OSM?
chainage_end=27161.5996094
chainage_start=14396.2998047
shape_length=12765.2998022

Btw, the key name:proposed should be proposed:name.

Jan
DavidKewley (2016-12-07 22:08:35+00:00): Hi, I'm curious why you deleted this stream? From the aerial imagery, it looks plausible that there is a stream there. Do you know the area in fine enough detail to know that in fact there is no stream here? Thanks -David
DavidKewley (2016-12-07 22:15:01+00:00): Same question here: Why did you delete this stream? From aerial imagery looks like a stream may well exist under the trees, and deleting the stream broke stream flow continuity. Please let us all know what your thinking is. Thanks! -David
-karlos- (2018-03-28 09:33:28+00:00): Nodes 4543325962 etc. are power poles? (as part of a way power:line?)
mueschel (2016-12-09 15:55:00+00:00): Hi,
I never heard of a currency named 'XLT-GBAR' - could you explain these tags?

Jan
FrViPofm (2016-12-09 19:46:59+00:00): Of course, you have never heard. It's new... It's a guess of mapping LETS.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/Key:local_currency
mueschel (2016-12-09 19:55:51+00:00): Thanks, I didn't find this wiki page using google. I think the plan would benefit from being converted to a full proposal. I don't know if it makes sense to have keys with cash/contactless - what about e.g. chip cards, coupons? I would move this information to the value, not to the key.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-23 13:27:09+00:00): What is the intended meaning of construction=cutting tag used for example at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458305617 ?
blackadder (2020-01-23 13:46:08+00:00): That section of the track is proposed to be in cutting
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-24 08:51:17+00:00): I think that cutting=yes is usually used for such things.

Maybe proposed:cutting=yes if someone likes namespaces.

(I encountered this because I was fixing railway=tram construction=tram type of tagging mistakes and this is railway=proposed construction=* way)