piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allison P (2022-09-22 17:35:29+00:00): Most places are only tagged as cities if they have over 100,000 people. Regional importance is factored in, so you might convince me to consider this a town, but as Soda Springs is an hour's drive from Pocatello, which has more than 10 times the population, there is no comparison.

place=city does not mean "incorporated municipality legally called a city". You wouldn't call Warm River with its three people a city just because it's legally a city, would you?

Soda Springs does not have a commercial airport, which is what really matters. Try asking other people on OpenStreetMap in the OSMUS Slack server what they think. You'll find little agreement with a city classification. https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-01 20:33:21+00:00): Tak? Nie wydaje mi się.
starsep (2022-08-01 20:35:02+00:00): Co znaczy została wymyślona? Czy jest to nazwa potoczna? Mieszkam blisko i nie kojarzę
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 20:06:49+00:00): Ці скрипти ламають назви для вулиць з різними назвами зліва та справа. Це все треба буде revert-ити
olehz (2022-08-01 20:51:23+00:00): дай, плз, приклади. я поправлю. не думаю, що такого багато. я таке колись десь бачив, але як то через відношення реалізувати і через name без додаткових тегів не дуже уявляю.
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 21:05:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905325766

Я робив по тому, що пропонує валідатор osmose: name = name:left + " / " + name:right (або навпаки праве-ліве). Треба, щоб апострофи були однаковими і в name:left/name:right/name:left:uk/name:right/uk і не було 2х слів вулиця в кінці назви
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 21:06:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:left
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 21:08:09+00:00): Не той лінк дав. Цей зламаний https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825277035
muchichka_s (2022-08-01 21:25:42+00:00): + Воно не повністю відпрацьовує. Частину елементів дороги перейменувало, частину пропустило https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10797897
adrianojbr (2022-08-02 17:57:19+00:00): Olá, Luis Maximenco!

Corrigi a sintaxe de CEP e adicionei nova área para o edifício, já que nem todo área do quarte é construída.

Abraço!
lyctkel (2023-12-05 15:09:46+00:00): Hi clementader,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9925513004 you wrote recycling:glass_bottles=3.5  .
I guess you meant recycling:glass_bottles=yes.
Regards
lyctkel
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:38:43+00:00): Hola Nicol 22, aquí se ha cambiado toda el área residencial de Pucallpa como si fuera un edificio, por favor ten mas cuidado al editar un objeto existente.
Saludos
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:02:16+00:00): Hola, he retirado un par de edificios grandes que no existen, ya que la etiqueta de edificio debe de usarse unicamente para edificios individuales.
Saludos
Andres Vicharra Moncada (2022-08-01 21:41:12+00:00): Muchas gracias y disculpe tratare de ser mas cuidado estoy en proceso de aprendizaje. :(
GeorgeHoneywood (2022-08-01 22:12:07+00:00): More of a service road than a track. Serves a pumping? station by the A31.
SekeRob (2022-08-03 17:16:07+00:00): Hi,

sorta wondering if that descriptive text was a copy/paste as OSM rejects hard carriage return. I've removed them to solve the issue

And thanks for mapping this 'glaring' port omission.

ciao
rocknrollsuicide (2022-08-03 21:48:04+00:00): Nah, the hard CR came from my own keyboard, not someone else's :) Didn't know about this particular quirk in OSM. Thanks for pointing that out.
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:34:14+00:00): Hola, esta agregando mal la etiqueta de direcciones, colocando a Calleria como estado, en algunas otras edificaciones sin capitalizar el texto o escribiendo mal los textos.
Saludos
Andres Vicharra Moncada (2022-08-01 21:45:00+00:00): lo siento, estoy en proceso de aprendizaje. Tratare de hacerlo mejor para mejorar la comunidad :(
Dodko (2022-08-02 05:44:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58375537/history
toto nie je bytový dom ale garáž
Dodko (2022-08-02 05:48:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58372397/history
táto garáž má adresu bez ulice a iné súpisné číslo
addr:city=Bratislava
addr:conscriptionnumber=4734
addr:housenumber=4734
addr:place=Staré Mesto

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13886799?pos=48.152310,17.089606,19
arcanma (2022-08-03 17:35:55+00:00): Ciao Tommaso, vedo che sei alla prima modifica, benvenuto!
Per meglio descrivere la croce che hai inserito sarebbe meglio aggiungere un tag specifico per le croci, se si tratta di una croce di molti anni fa vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahistoric%3Dwayside_cross, altrimenti se non ha un rilievo storico vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcross
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
emersonveenstra (2022-08-02 00:53:33+00:00): Hi,

Why did you add `foot=yes` to a bunch of sidewalks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677283428 ? `highway=footway` is meant to be designated for foot traffic, if youre trying to indicate a multiuse path, then it should be highway=cycleway or highway=path
Trail_Caretaker (2022-08-03 17:29:52+00:00): Let's use a better way to communicate.  This took me a while to find.  Can we communicate another way, like email, text, phone, etc?
emersonveenstra (2022-08-03 23:32:07+00:00): You get emailed whenever someone comments on your changesets, so if you arent getting those, you need to fix your email setup. But no, theres no reason to move it elsewhere, we need to discuss this in the open, so others can chime in or learn from this.
Trail_Caretaker (2022-08-03 23:55:53+00:00): Everytime you have OSM email me I have to go to my pc and login to OSM to see respond to your emails for starters.  I am also going to guarantee that this will be many back and forths before this is done vs just talking for a few mintutes.  I nor my OSM friend could agree on what you meant in your first correspondance.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-04 01:30:50+00:00): Adding foot=yes on a highway=footway is unusual, highway=footway already implies foot=designated, so by adding foot=yes youre saying that its no longer designated for foot traffic. So i was wondering if you were trying to indicate that it was a shared cycleway or multi-use path, and was suggesting that you should look at highway=cycleway or highway=path, they might be better for that way if its not designated for foot traffic
Trail_Caretaker (2022-08-04 02:33:17+00:00): It is just a standard sidewalk that can be used for all bikes or walking.  Just like 99% of the sidewalk length out there.  Ok, are you saying that my marking the sidewalk for foot is unusual and redundant?  Ok, it proably is.  I am not sure what the big deal is to be unusual and redundant though.  

What is the end effect difference of Foot=(phantomed out grey) designated vs.  Foot = yes?

If a sidewalk was built for both bikers and walkers in mind, why can't they both = yes?
emersonveenstra (2022-08-04 04:58:54+00:00): The effect is that it no longer matches the real world. By putting foot=yes and bicycle=yes, youre saying that foot and bicycle traffic have equal rights to the sidewalk, but thats not true in Michigan law (MCL 257.660c) which states that cyclists must yield right of way to pedestrians on sidewalks. And the way to show that in OSM is to keep the default/implied foot=designated (showing pedestrians always have right of way over everything else) and bicycle=yes (showing bicycles can legally ride but do not have right of way). The michigan wiki page also sets the standard of not putting foot=yes on sidewalks (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Sidewalks_/_Footways for the standardized tagging scheme)

So yeah, as boring as it sounds, this stuff does matter if we're going to build an accurate map, and we need to do it correctly
treestryder (2024-07-06 15:29:44+00:00): For quick access to changeset discussions, bookmark this: 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10927321&showblockedcontributors

Or the top of that site: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Trail_Caretaker

OSMCha has a speech bubble for changesets with disucussions:
https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Trail_Caretaker%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Trail_Caretaker%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
PT-53 (2022-08-02 04:51:27+00:00): Hallo Robert,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast diesen Track (Feld- bzw. Waldweg für 2-spurige Fahrzeuge) neu eingezeichnet und u.a. mit dem Merkmal
- motor_vehicle=no
versehen. Damit dürfte dort nichteinmal ein Landwirt mit seinem Traktor fahren. Das wird wohl nicht stimmen.
Steht dort ein Verkehrszeichen und wenn ja welches?
Die Nummer kannst Du Dir im OSM-Verkehrszeichen-Tool anzeigen lassen:
- http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/


Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
RobertJS93 (2022-08-02 20:48:30+00:00): Hey PT-53,
danke für den guten Review! Bei dem Weg war kein extra Schild, ich habe jetzt access=agricultural gesetzt, so wie bei allen umgebenden Wegen. Tut mir Leid, ich hätte einfach beim Eintragen schauen sollen was so bei Feldwegen üblich ist.
Danke und viele Grüße!
PT-53 (2022-08-03 05:07:04+00:00): Hallo Robert,
Danke für Deine Rückmeldung.

Access=agricultural ist auf jeden Fall falsch, auch wenn es noch an vielen Feldwegen zu finden ist. Mit access=agricultural wird alles außer landw. Verkehr verboten, auch Fußgänger!
Wenn dort aber kein Verkehrszeichen steht, dann gibt es auch kein Verbot für irgendwen.

Aller Anfang ist schwer, so ist das auch bei OSM.
Hier gibt es noch gute Infos für OSM-Neueinsteiger:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners'_guide
https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/
http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf
Schaus Dir mal an.

Grüße
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:21:40+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta nombre no esta destinado a poner una descripción de lo que funciona alli, sino de agregar un nombre particular en caso lo tenga. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Andres Vicharra Moncada (2022-08-01 21:43:08+00:00): lo siento mucho, tratare de mejorar y gracias por el comentario. 
:(
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:27:42+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:19:19+00:00): Aquí quería decir uso de suelo residencial
ivanbranco (2022-08-02 15:50:31+00:00): Hi MenKauRa,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22place%22%3D%2211%22+global&R

could you check this place=* tags please? Something is wrong
MenKauRa (2022-12-18 18:19:39+00:00): OK
I'll try to take a look at it as soon as I can
Thanks
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:39:36+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta addr:street no esta destinada para agregar toda la dirección con manzana incluida, para esto puede utilizar addr:full.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
ovruni (2022-08-01 21:45:44+00:00): Hola RogerRicardoP, he notado que en varios de los conjuntos de cambios se han agregado etiquetas de cruce de peatones en intersecciones de vías, lo cual es incorrecto, ademas de nombres en objetos que no deben de llevar uno, tampoco deben de llevar un addr:street, ya que forman parte de la vía, ese valor va para otros objetos como negocios, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tienes dudas sobre como mapear tenemos un canal de telegram donde puedes realizar consultas sobre como realizar el mapeo https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
user_2066394 (2022-08-03 14:59:03+00:00): Stimmt die Zuordnung der südlichen Gebäude zu "Brückl"?
user_2066394 (2022-08-03 15:00:04+00:00): Beispiel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987197986
LanciaDelta (2022-08-06 11:09:20+00:00): Entschuldigung, mein Fehler! Die als Brückl 2, 2a und 2b gekennzeichneten Gebäude gehören noch zum Schwaigerfeld.
Danke für den Hinweis.
user_2066394 (2022-08-06 13:58:02+00:00): Einwandfrei, Nr. 1 und 1a haben aktuell  auch noch Brückl. Bei Garagen würden wir die Hausnummer komplett weglassen.
user_2066394 (2022-08-12 21:27:40+00:00): nachbereitet

Quelle für die Hausnummern war Survey?
sundew (2022-08-01 22:05:45+00:00): Anmerkung: ein Node von der selben Tour in Quisdorf ist versehentlich mit in diesen Changeset gerutscht .. Deshalb diese flächenmäßige Ausdehnung ..
trigpoint (2022-08-02 10:36:32+00:00): Hi, just wondering what is the source of these postcodes? 

Cheers Phil
eastender (2022-08-02 11:18:21+00:00): The source is code-point open. In this case, there were some partial postcodes already in place for SY4 5UP. I am working on trying to clear all of the partial postcodes in the UK. Here I added the missing elements for SY4 5UP and also added postcode SY4 5TW for completeness of Somerset Way. See https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/SY/SY4/5/ (which should show these postcode centroids in green tomorrow, after the nightly update).

Regards

Mike
trigpoint (2022-08-02 12:11:38+00:00): Thank you.

When I have tried using just the points of code-point open I have foung it impossible to determine where one ends and another begins.

Cheers Phil
ovruni (2022-08-02 00:33:30+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre solamente es para cuando un objeto tiene un nombre particular, no para ingresar descripciones como "Escalera Terminal", "Extremo Derecho del Puente". [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
ElliottPlack (2022-08-30 02:20:14+00:00): Hi there, what was erroneous about the foot access here? 

I see you added a foot=no prohibition to these roads. This tagging is only appropriate if there is a sign posted saying that no pedestrians are allowed here. 

Tell me about what you were trying to do here and I can try to help with the community. I see you are a runner, so perhaps this was an edit geared towards removing these roads from CityStrides, StreetFerret, or Wandrer? I'm into those as well, but I also represent the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group where we keep OSM data consistent and to the community's standards. Thanks!
maraf24 (2022-10-21 13:29:36+00:00): Hej. Jaki Geoportal?
Ten zbiornik wygląda zupełnie inaczej na ostatnim orto.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083052421
Wyrysowany obrys odpowiada zaś starszemu orto.
pitfire (2022-08-03 14:22:04+00:00): Hallo IsAlexReal,
hier steht ein Baum mitten im Gebäude #1083055396 !!!
Glassman (2022-08-02 19:49:38+00:00): #TIP: It helps to add the type of business it is. I went ahead and added shop=cannabis to the building. If you think this is wrong just correct the tag. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124367033
Austrianton (2022-08-12 18:09:13+00:00): Please keep single change-sets local if possible, to avoid spamming the history feed over large areas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks and happy mapping
Helicopter1 (2022-08-18 20:29:13+00:00): Sorry, I didn't know that the changes in the StreetComplete app are all uploaded as one change. I will be careful in the future not to do something in so many places at once. Thanks for the tip.
Austrianton (2022-08-18 21:25:13+00:00): No worries and thanks in advance for your future efforts.

Happy mapping
pitfire (2022-08-02 04:22:12+00:00): Hallo IsAlexReal,
bitte die Nummer im internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format angegeben
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
user_8101879 (2022-08-02 15:27:23+00:00): Hi,

the relation 4269031 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Your version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:18:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351555
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:36:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351828
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:57:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352095
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:22:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351609
arvdk (2022-08-04 22:57:41+00:00): Was it your intention to exclude this one building from the city? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/169759
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:45:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351946
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:57:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352095
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:40:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351873
MichaelR42 (2025-01-10 15:26:28+00:00): I'm curious why this was done.  It says that the private inholdings are not part of the national forest and that is not correct.
bhietsch (2025-01-10 15:49:04+00:00): Hi - this has been extensively discussed on multiple forums whether to map proclamation vs ownership boundaries of NFs. Ultimately it's a matter of opinion, but the majority seems to agree that it's misleading to map private inholdings as part of the NF since the USFS has no jurisdiction. The boundary is tagged as boundary=protected_area, and it would be incorrect to say that the entire proclamation boundary is protected, public land.

I've linked some resources on this topic below. If you strongly feel that this needs to be revisited, I would suggest starting a conversation on one of OSM's public forums where others can weigh in on it. Happy mapping!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands/Forest_Service#Replace_proclamation_boundaries
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-inholdings-private-land-in-us-national-forests/104346/4
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data#National_Forest_and_National_Grassland_Boundaries
MichaelR42 (2025-01-10 16:45:11+00:00): I'm kinda new at this still so thanks for the links.  The point about boundary=protected_area is a good one.
bhietsch (2025-01-10 17:27:39+00:00): No problem, happy to see others taking interest in mapping NPS and USFS public lands! And to comment on your note that you left on the NF relation - this is a bug with the rendering engine and not the relation itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there's been much movement to correct it: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4198

An example of a rendering where Ozark-St. Francis (and other complex, "checkerboard" NF relations) is properly displayed: https://americanamap.org/#map=9.21/35.6946/-93.3143
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:18:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351555
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:22:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351609
sputinyk (2022-08-16 18:24:10+00:00): this changeset deleted your mapping: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123903620/
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:57:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352095
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:45:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351946
Allison P (2022-08-11 05:31:10+00:00): addr:state=ID?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4710892055/history
CurlingMan13 (2022-08-11 05:44:24+00:00): Should be Iowa.  Good catch - state=IA

updated.
Glassman (2022-08-02 19:53:33+00:00): The rest areas you added look more like amenity=restroom. Can you review your edits to see if they should be changed? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124368520
Greg_Rose (2022-08-15 07:59:02+00:00): Actually - the 6 rest areas I just looked at are completely bogus. I suspect that this whole changeset needs to be reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-15 18:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124941507 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6246
arvdk (2022-08-04 22:31:05+00:00): Hi Jaden,
Thank you for your contributions! I got a few feedback points to further increase the quality:
- Connect any driveway to the road, not just the sidewalk
- (Back)yard details are not as important as the next street buildings
- If possible, add adresses.
- Single trampolines are not tagged as trampoline parks, but rather as 'playground=trampoline' (use the text input tagging for that). More information is available on the OpenStreetMap Wiki.
- Add descriptive comments so people know what you did. It may be as fun as a game, but you're adding information that is going to be used world wide :D

Keep up the good work.
Allison P (2022-08-05 00:45:57+00:00): Personal info needs to be redacted by the DWG. Those are not proper names for the houses. Not everything has a name.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-06 15:23:30+00:00): Personal info redacted by DWG.
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
pertile (2022-08-02 16:14:35+00:00): Hola, la habilitación de autopista se hizo solo sobre 4 km y convertiste a motorway 59 km. La obra en total tiene 33 km. Voy a revertir tus cambios, cualquier consulta o sugerencia no dudes en contactarte conmigo.
willkmis (2022-08-02 15:16:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Can you describe to me in a little more detail what change you're trying to indicate here? Does something block the access to the parking lot from Fairfax? For future reference, if you see something wrong that you aren't able to fix, you can add a fixme="description of problem" tag.
Best,
Will
ProfessorFrink (2022-08-02 17:48:04+00:00): Hi Willkmis

the private parking lot is blocked by yellow metal/concrete barricades that block the Fairfax entrance. only access is from the alley way. it looks strange because the parking spots face the wrong way and you need to back into them. i believe the owners of the business on the left and right were upset about people using the lot so they made it hard to use. right now parking is for the thrift store, clothing store and some employee parking. the Canters parking lot is the best public paid parking lot in the Fairfax district. thanks for the fixme tip
ProfessorFrink (2022-08-02 17:54:11+00:00): Hi Willkmis

the private parking lot is blocked by yellow metal/concrete barricades that block the Fairfax entrance. only access is from the alley way. it looks strange because the parking spots face the wrong way and you need to back into them. i believe the owners of the business on the left and right were upset about people using the lot so they made it hard to use. right now parking is for the thrift store, clothing store and some employee parking. the Canters parking lot is the best public paid parking lot in the Fairfax district.
willkmis (2022-08-03 02:07:47+00:00): OK, in this changeset I added the bollards and disconnected the parking aisle from Fairfax, let me know if you think that fixes the issue! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124414311