piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GartenStuhl (2021-04-30 08:18:37+00:00): Sali tschösi
Ist korrekt. Es ist zu empfehlen, dass noch ein "; PH off" angehängt wird (public holidays / an Feiertagen geschlossen)
Hier ein online-Tool um den Syntax einfach zu überprüfen:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?lng=de#
tschoesi (2021-04-30 08:39:25+00:00): perfekt, danke!
rthik007 (2021-04-30 03:30:57+00:00): Hi NhanH2020,
Dragged the node 8601123110 as ways are overlapping with one another
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103876296
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103869834
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-12-01 21:28:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28402243 kreeg de twee namen ADHV het GRB. Op Mapillary (2019) zijn er geen straatnaambordjes te zien aan begin/eind van dit segment
NKA (2023-04-09 17:00:39+00:00): Et par kommentarer til denne way'en (og mange andre tilsvarende i området her):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936920218#map=18/62.34648/5.86380

1) Dette er et fortau. Tagges ikke som highway=cycleway, men highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.

2) bicycle=designated behøves ikke sammen med highway=cycleway (det er allerede implisitt).
mtbboy1993 (2023-04-10 09:53:07+00:00): jeg markerte den slik, da det så ut som en vanlig gang og sykkelvei, vanlige bredden for det. men er ikke lokalkjent, så noen so mer det bør sjekke dette. Men de andre som er det har skilt. der det står det er gang og sykkelvei. vanligvis er gang og sykkelvei 2.5m.
highflyer74 (2021-05-02 08:20:17+00:00): Moin!

Mir fiel dieses Objekt auf, weil es einen Namen trägt, der kein Name ist.

Bitte beachte, dass wir name=* nur vergeben, wenn ein Objekt einen Eigennamen hat und nicht, um Dinge zu beschreiben. Die anderen vorhandenen Tags besagen bereits, um was es sich handelt.

Denke auch daran, dass wir die Dinge nicht auf eine bestimmte Art taggen, damit sie auf der Karte sichtbar werden. Das nennt sich "Taggen für den Renderer" und ist nicht erwünscht. Ich weiß ja nicht, wie es in diesem Fall ist, aber ggf. ist das das building=* hier nicht korrekt...

Damit Du verstehst, wie wir langfristig gute Daten erhalten, lies Dir am besten einmal folgende Links durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
highflyer74 (2021-05-04 06:19:46+00:00): Hi nochmal! Auch area=yes ist nicht sinnvoll. man_made=* reicht. area=yes verwenden wir nur in Sonderfällen für Objekte, die im Normalfall als Linie gemappt werden würden. Ansonsten ist es nicht notwendig, da sich bereits aus der Form des Objekts ergibt, dass es eine Fläche ist. Viele Grüße!
michel60 (2023-07-01 13:30:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas convaincu. Je pense qu'il manque le tag oneway:bicycle no car il semble que les vélos ont le droit de circuler dans les deux sens non ? 
Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Cordialement Michel
Mariusz189 (2022-12-17 12:32:16+00:00): Stosowanie dwóch numerów w jednym tagu wydaje mi się błędnym oznaczeniem bo nawigacje widzą to jako jeden długi numer, tam samo dwa linki w jednym tagu url nawigacje widzą to jako jeden długi link https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7927982794
NorthCrab (2022-12-17 12:54:31+00:00): Brzmi jak błąd aplikacji a nie mapowania (zarówno phone jak i website).

Dokumentacja mówi jasno jak należy mapować kilka numerów telefonów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone?uselang=en#How_to_map

Pozdrawiam!
FvGordon (2021-05-01 08:41:54+00:00): With this and the following two changesets you created a lot of dragged nodes like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259203236 . Can you please repair what you have done with this upload?
tkoval83 (2021-04-30 17:06:47+00:00): могли б ви уточнити яку дорогу видалити після перенесення маршрутів?
frienlydisaster (2021-04-30 17:13:25+00:00): Лінія: Чернівецька вулиця (756313974)
На ній стоїть моя мітка. Це дорога яка перетинала колись пішохідний променад, з'єднувала праву і ліву частину вулиці Чернівецької.
frienlydisaster (2021-04-30 17:14:07+00:00): Точніше зараз перетинає на карті його, але її вже насправді не існує
wuff57 (2021-05-11 10:30:29+00:00): Hallo, mir war am Wochenende das Schild Hanns-Voith-Promenade (an der Newporter Straße) aufgefallen und ich wollte das nachtragen. Jetzt sehe ich, dass das Ding Döbelner Promenade heissen soll. Kommt die Umbenennung noch in der Zukunft? Zumindest am Wochenende gab es noch mindestens ein Schild Hanns-Voith-Promenade. Sollte man dann nicht auch noch das name tag hinzufügen? Viele Grüße, Franz-Peter
kdkeller (2021-05-11 11:21:59+00:00): Hallo Franz-Peter,
vielen Dank für deine Nachfrage. Der Gemeinderat hat die Namensänderung beschlossen. Im Zeitungsbericht stand, dass es „dieses Jahr“ stattfindet. Im Key „old name“ steht noch der Name Hanns-Voith-Promenade, man findet sie also noch. Aber natürlich hast du recht. Vor Ort steht der alte Name noch, und das Mappen wir ja eigentlich. Wenn du möchtest, ändere es nochmal zurück. Viele Grüße,
Klaus-Dieter
wuff57 (2021-05-11 16:01:50+00:00): Hallo Klaus-Dieter, ich hab da keine starke Meinung zu. Ich hätte dem Weg "Hanns-Voith-Promenade" als "name" tag gegeben (bis jetzt hat der Weg noch keinen "name" gehabt) und es geändert, wenn es auch vorort geändert ist. Viele Grüße, Franz-Peter
kdkeller (2021-05-11 16:21:40+00:00): Hallo nochmal,
jetzt verstehe ich es erst ;-)
Ja, klar, der name-tag fehlt. Da geb ich mir so Mühe mit der Namensherkunft, aber das Wichtigste hab ich vergessen. Danke
kdkeller (2021-05-11 16:22:01+00:00): Hab den Namen hinzugefügt.
kdkeller (2021-05-11 16:31:49+00:00): Kannst du gern noch in den "aktuellen" ändern, aber es wird nicht lange dauern.
wuff57 (2021-05-11 17:51:31+00:00): Passt schon 😀
BCNorwich (2021-04-30 07:04:17+00:00): Hello Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled. So it's not really the place to upload personal details. Thus I have removed the fiction you uploaded.

If you need help adding genuine features please just ask. 

Regards Bernard.
!bm (2021-05-09 20:45:39+00:00): Hallo Marlix20,

die Änderungen scheinen (nicht nur mir) hier nicht ganz richtig – s https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2647310

Aus im Cs genannten Gründen revertiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104410398

--besteGrüße!bm
rskedgell (2021-04-30 04:44:30+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map.

You asked for a review of this changeset, so I've taken a quick look.

One think you might want to change is to use natural=wood when mapping tree cover as an area, as natural=tree_row is intended to be used as a linear feature. Links to the wiki documentation for both tags are below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 12:30:40+00:00): ziet er goed uit
watmildon (2025-02-19 06:12:00+00:00): The field work here is lovely.

I updated the mascot infomation (which apparently just recently changed again!) so that is renders well on my mascot map. https://github.com/watmildon/HighSchoolMascotMap

Keep up the great work!
Dr Kludge (2021-08-29 06:54:26+00:00): You deleted a bunch of my work.  It would be nice if you would include more of a discussion than removal.  Why did you you remove all the buildings in a plant nursery?
Dimacn (2021-04-30 03:48:13+00:00): Прекратите вандальные действия. Вы удалили здание правительства Амурской области https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164157419 и нарисовали на этом же месте своё кривое. При этом потеряли адрес, название, этажность и прочие свойства объекта. Так делать нельзя, надо просто редактировать существующие объекты. 2. Не надо давать описательные названия объектам если свойства задаются тегами. В данном случае у игровой площадки не может быть название "возле дома". В name пишем собственное официальное название. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name 3. Дворовые проезды должны тегироваться как highway=service - тут ошибки https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435599980 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559581064   
Я отменю вашу правку.
Dimacn (2021-04-30 03:13:33+00:00): Прекратите вандальные действия. 1. На основании чего вы удалили дворовую дорогу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483181779 вокруг домов Игнатьевское шоссе №20 и №18 ? Дорога там есть! 2. Зачем вы удалили объекты типа трава https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129300198 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129300201 ? 3. Что это за название парка "ч"? Я отменю вашу правку как вандальную и плохое картографирование.
Dimacn (2021-04-30 03:26:41+00:00): Зачем вы переделали остановку "Институтская" в кафе Ландыш? Кафе нужно отметить отдельной точкой, пожалуйста исправьте.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-30 17:36:12+00:00): Por favor,  não vandalize o mapa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103873376
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-10 00:31:51+00:00): hi Valmirdm,
can you confirm this restriction relation role (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/5555876)? relation missing a "from" member. there is only "via" and "to".
Thank you, happy mapping!
Arma IRM-ED (2021-06-14 04:37:22+00:00): Hi, Valmirdm.
Have a great day.

I found this relation (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/7719240) has incomplete members. It is not well-formed: Missing a from and/or to member

Please confirm why you removed the role members? Thank you

Happy Mapping!
cserpell (2021-04-30 21:32:15+00:00): Hola, buenísimo aporte. Una consulta: Veo que marcas todas las divisiones como "fence", pero seguro que hay algunos que son muros. En ese caso, es mejor marcarlos como "wall". Qué estés bien!
quimier (2021-04-30 23:23:41+00:00): La verdad las marqué con Fence/Cerco porque desconocía otro vector para detallar. No sabía lo de Wall/Muro. Gracias por aclarar el detalle, así trabajo mejor con ella. Slds!
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-09 04:26:17+00:00): Hi Valmirdm,
please have a look at your last month edit of restriction type relation. looks like this https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/8724198 relation missing a "from" role. there is only to and via. thank you
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-06-11 03:18:07+00:00): halo valmirdm, trust you as well. i delete left restriction https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/8724198
based on image https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-23.380891802643&lng=-51.452925701837&z=17&pKey=299895268306555&focus=photo

please let me know. if there an update info or data.. thank you
OddlyAngled (2021-04-30 05:42:46+00:00): I've found many peaks to be off, sometimes by more than a mile. check the change history for each peak and fix up any older ones to the 1990s era USGS quads (pretty accurate), as you see fit. if you question a more recent update just send a message to the author to get more details before making a change that may revert work they have done. in particular areas I may be able to help with getting better quality summit coordinates, just no guarantees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103873832
Stoaty Marmot (2021-04-30 13:41:43+00:00): Am I correct in assuming that the elevation listed for the GNIS ID on geonames.usgs.gov is a good number for the elevation?  I have found peaks that are low by 100+ meters compared to GNIS.  Same question for the longitude/latitude data.  PS How do I go about changing the longitude/latitude?
OddlyAngled (2021-04-30 16:09:28+00:00): maybe, maybe not. I haven't looked into the accuracy of the elevations there but the lat/lon aren't very accurate. they're usually in the general area but that's about it. I only add elevations when there is a trusted reference (surveyed elevations/benchmarks) since I don't know a better reference. the 3DEP lidar data will presumably become this once it's available for the high Sierra. I understand that many changes have been made to the geoid since the 80s (when many of the GNIS entries were last updated) so I wouldn't be surprised if they were based off an old ellipsoid. https://eos-gnss.com/elevation-for-beginners has a  quick overview of the challenges around this.

as for moving individual nodes... I haven't seen a way of doing it other than dragging them to the correct position in iD or JOSM. it's possible to do it by creating a .osm.xml file though, just not as user friendly.
Stoaty Marmot (2021-05-01 03:33:39+00:00): I have installed JOSM and have a basic idea how to use it to relocate a peak which is off.  How do you decide what the correct location is for a peak?  Latitude/longitude from GNIS?  Coordinates from somewhere else?
OddlyAngled (2021-05-01 03:47:36+00:00): I use a few sources: USGS topos, USGS 3DEP files/layers, and a file proceed by the owner of peakbagger.com to use for OSM updates. I mostly use the latter to programatically identify misplaced peaks and use the USGS sources as the primary, it's a very manual process. There are some cases where the highest point does not match the topos for a variety of reasons. My hope is in a few years we will have LIDAR coverage everywhere and can derive most of this from the data when quality surveys are not available.
jcarlson (2021-04-30 13:02:14+00:00): Please make note of your imagery offset settings, and be sure the imagery aligns with existing features before adding new things. Otherwise, very nice work with all these sidewalks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103873875
jcarlson (2021-04-30 13:00:38+00:00): Remember to square building corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103873993
skquinn (2021-05-09 22:01:48+00:00): operator=* is used for the entity operating the given mapped item. Anne McCormick Sullivan isn't operating much of anything, as she's been dead since 2013. Generally it's not necessary to tag operator=* for items such as school playgrounds anyway, so I've removed this.
Sat_spike (2021-07-29 06:15:27+00:00): Hello mayday36,  thanks for working on the map! I see you are adding building and land use features in the region. However, the tag "farmland=field" is an invalid tag. Instead, you should use "landuse=farmland" if you are trying to map farmlands. Here is an OSM wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland) you can refer to for additional detail on tagging guidelines.
portalaventura (2021-04-30 01:58:49+00:00): Luiz Pedro Fornari Balduino, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Mato Grosso do Sul mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osm_ms.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2021-04-30 07:26:55+00:00): Hi,

No need to excluded parks, schools, etc from residential landuse areas.
mitchef (2021-05-01 07:44:47+00:00): Hi Warin, Do you mean the residential landuse multipolygon? I'm thinking of replacing it with smaller areas
Warin61 (2021-05-01 09:09:35+00:00): Yes.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-04-30 02:17:00+00:00): Accidentally used an old changeset comment. OSIP imagery was used.
tastrax (2021-05-07 08:21:50+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
PT-53 (2021-04-30 07:13:22+00:00): Hallo,
ich kann auf dem Bing-Luftbild aus 2019 dort keine Wege erkennen, nur eine große Fläche.
Wenn Ihr neuere Luftbilder zur Verfügung habt, würde ich die gerne sehen.
Grüße
bashwith (2021-05-05 02:34:05+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the changes based on the Bing Ariel imagery. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality. I request you to go ahead and make the necessary changes or let me know with the required modifications. always happy to learn from the community
portalaventura (2021-04-30 03:00:35+00:00): Bruno Crivelatti, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio Grande do Sul mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrs.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-30 03:03:52+00:00): pedrin459, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-30 03:20:17+00:00): R These, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio Grande do Sul mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrs.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
user_5359 (2021-04-30 15:26:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
pa_vani (2022-04-18 11:39:08+00:00): Hi Elyana IRM-ED, 

Hope you are doing well! Thanks for the edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103877772
Mar4s (2021-04-30 08:58:17+00:00): Hey,

this edit is not valid -> edited highway doesn't exist anymore and existing bus connections are using "Zvonařka" and "Dornych" streets.

Have a nice day,
Michal
Aleks-Berlin (2021-05-13 15:37:04+00:00): Hi Lawrence Leung,
you added 81 nodes with tag "natural=tre" (not tree as it should be).
Could you please check it?
Thx, Alex
map per (2021-05-04 19:19:06+00:00): Hello neerdixi,

this is the second time that Amazon Logistics mapped roads that don't exist any more in my neighbourhood. Taking a look at the latest aerial imagery one can clearly see that the roads don't exist any more.

Looking forward to hearing from you
map per
map per (2021-05-04 19:25:37+00:00): Moreover the roads never existed in that way as there once was a guard railing that separated customer parking and delivery access
neerdixi (2021-05-05 08:06:43+00:00): Hi Map per, 
Thanks for looking into my edit. My genuine apologies for the miss from my end. I have added the road as per Bing aerial imagery but I have missed checking the esri world imagery which is latest and over looked the construction feature added. I also apologize for the incorrect road geometry created. I'll make sure to keep a check on this in all my future edits by verifying all the available OSM resources. Thanks for your constructive feedback. 
Regards,
neerdixi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Russ McD (2022-02-19 06:23:07+00:00): Kesinee - Way: ถนน พ่อขุน (936999759)  - Why have you made this road into a dual carraigeway?
It only has a thin painted traffic island, which then turns into just a double yellow line.
Thai mapping protocol is to map these as single ways, not two, and your changes are destroying routing engines as no right turns are possible as you have drawn things .. in reality, you can.
Please be more careful when armchair mapping if you don't know the area.
I will be reverting a lot of your edits.
Russ
Russ McD (2022-02-19 06:28:29+00:00): Furthermore, the road correctly has 4 lanes ... when u added the second carriageway, you made no attempt to correct the lane information, or even add the road ref to the tiny sections you added, all of which should have been merged.
Your mapping is poor and I suspect we will have to fix a lot more stuff.  Thankfully you appear to have stopped editing now that Grab have cut funding.
siddhaam (2021-04-30 10:17:45+00:00): Hi, 
Apologies for using internal terminology on OSM, the correct comment for the change set: 103882135 is Added driveway #amap.

Regards,
siddhaam
mueschel (2021-05-04 13:41:21+00:00): Hi,
'maxheightrating:hgv' is not used in other places yet - shouldn't that be 'maxheight'?
Barataria2 (2021-05-04 21:48:40+00:00): Hello mueschel. After a review, I do believe that a ‘maxheight’ key with a numerical value in meters is more accurate. I will update this and review all others that I have added with similar tagging schemes. Thank you for pointing this out.
Dimacn (2021-04-30 10:08:42+00:00): Не надо давать описательные названия объектам если свойства задаются тегами. В данном случае не может быть названий “беговая дорожка”, "школьный лес", "детская площадка" и т.п. В name пишем собственное официальное название. Пожалуйста удалите эти названия. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name и  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия