piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-11-03 14:31:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
I noticed that you collect multiple buildings together and call it 1 building. Each building has to be mapped as an individual building.
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

would you be so kind to adjust your mappings here?
Task number 2013 and 2015 (still open for mapping)
success with mapping
hocu (2020-11-07 09:51:24+00:00): Hi thank you for your contributions.

Is this camping site really named "Çadir yeri"? If not, you shouldn't add that to the name field. Marking the place as a camp_site will be sufficient and the map viewing softwares will display it with a relevant icon.

Keep contributing, the map grows with your help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93308847
trigeo (2020-10-30 20:40:10+00:00): Adjusted geometry of existing way to match satellite imagery #Kaart 2020
aixbrick (2020-10-30 20:49:14+00:00): Hallo,
den Weg gibt es schon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621185054. Dieser ist bereits Bestandteil der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3464107. Allerdings fehlt dort das highway=path und barrier=gate ergibt keinen Sinn. Welcher Wegverlauf stimmt?
Gruß
simon29 (2020-10-31 11:06:56+00:00): Diese Relation (621185054) wird bei mir beim Bearbeiten als Objekttyp 'Zaun' angezeigt, und in der veröffentlichen Karte nicht als Weg.
aixbrick (2020-10-31 12:23:25+00:00): Ja, wegen dem barrier=gate. Das müsste gelöscht und ein highway=path ergänzt werden. Dann wird der Weg wieder richtig angezeigt. Die Frage ist halt: Welcher der Wege (deiner oder der andere) bildet den korrekten Verlauf ab? Basiert dein Wegverlauf auf Vor-Ort-Kenntnisse?
simon29 (2020-10-31 20:15:16+00:00): Ich habe diesen Weg praktisch selber angelegt (mit der Gruppe, die den ganzen Rundweg um Eilendorf konzipiert hat). Also ja, sehr gute Vor-Ort-Kenntnisse. Mein Wegverlauf ist etwas genauer. Die Einbindung der andere Struktur in den 'Rundweg Eilendorf' natürlich schön. Mir ging es primär darum, den Weg dort zu schliessen, denn sonst spielen viele Routing Programme (Komoot o.ä.) da verrückt.
aixbrick (2020-10-31 20:46:56+00:00): OK, ich habe den alten Weg gelöscht und stattdessen deinen in die Relation aufgenommen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93351577).
Frans S (2020-11-05 15:26:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
See my PM  about mapping here in genera;
Your mappings are a bit below par. Not accurate enpugh. You map buildings as a rectangular despite they are more complex.
Please correct these buildings and put them on their groundplan
Task 2742
Best regards
skquinn (2020-11-02 04:21:22+00:00): Please try not to make changesets covering such a large area. Also, "Düzeltme" ("correction") tells us nothing about what you actually changed and is no more useful than no changeset comment at all.

---

Lütfen bu kadar geniş bir alanı kapsayan değişiklikler yapmamaya çalışın. Ayrıca, "Düzeltme" bize gerçekte neyi değiştirdiğiniz hakkında hiçbir şey söylemez ve hiçbir değişiklik ayar yorumu yapmamaktan daha yararlı değildir.
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:10+00:00): 
This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:45:45+00:00): Handled in message
literan (2021-11-05 20:15:04+00:00): зачем вы понаставили кавычек в названиях? 

откатываю все.
Кремлёвский штурман (2021-11-06 05:55:16+00:00): Потому что они положены по правилам русского языка. Посмотрите на оригинал названия.
Верните  всё обратно!
literan (2021-11-06 08:23:59+00:00): по каким еще правилам? здесь не литературный письменный язык используется.

Имеем: вы массово осуществили правки, без аргументации и не проконсультировавшись с сообществом. По правилам вы обязаны были открыть обсуждение в форуме и предварительно согласовать массовые изменения https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Соглашение_об_автоматизированных_правках 

В случае, если вы будете упорно продолжать какие-либо массовые  правки без согласования с сообществом, я обращусь в DWG за вашей блокировкой.
literan (2021-11-06 08:53:25+00:00): да, и еще один аргумент, почему эти ваши правки недостоверны и неприемлемы. 

В ряде случаев вы зачем-то дублируете название заправок в поле operator. Это поле не предназначено для дублирования названия, в нем согласно вики следует указывать "определенную компанию, организацию либо отдельное лицо в каком-либо виде, которое ответственно за работоспособность объекта". Т.е. конкретное ООО, АО или ИП. Обычно оно написано на табличке на входе: нужно выйти из машины, подойти к двери и переписать это название.
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:19+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:45:49+00:00): Handled in message
Betanyahoo (2020-12-12 20:18:00+00:00): Have you changed the town of Morelia https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5353807/history to landuse=industrial on purpose?
NicoVargas (2020-12-12 21:04:52+00:00): Hi Betanyahoo. It wasn't on purpose, I'm sorry. I'm going to revert it using JOSM as soon as possible. Thanks for let me know. Best regards
Romwriter (2020-10-31 08:17:32+00:00): Hallo Hubert87, danke für Deine Bearbeitung. Eine Rückfrage: Ist die Beschilderung wirklich mit Vz 239 (Gehweg)? An der Ecke Bürgermeister-Hildebrand-Straße stand neulich noch Vz 237 (Radweg) mit Zusatzschildern, Vz 239 habe ich nicht in Erinnerung.
Hubert87 (2020-10-31 11:56:45+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,
Z237 (radweg) ist richtig.
Sollte auch unter traffic_sign nun so richtig sein. Habe es eben nochmal überprüft.
Hatte mich mit Z239 vor ca 2 Jahren vertippt, als ich das das erste mal eingetragen habe.
Habe ich noch eine Stelle übersehen?
Romwriter (2020-11-01 13:18:24+00:00): Stadtauswärts ist das Tag traffic_sign jetzt entlang der Hans-Böckler-Straße durchgehend richtig, da beruhte meine Rückfrage von gestern vielleicht auf einem veralteten Datenbestand. Stadteinwärts gibt es einige Wege mit Vz 239, bei denen ich Zweifel habe. Ich kann mir das in den nächsten Tagen mal vor Ort ansehen.
Hubert87 (2020-11-01 14:00:38+00:00): Musst Du nicht vor Ort ansehen. Ist auf jedem Fall falsch. Die Frage wäre aber ob dort Z241 oder Z237 aufgestellt ist.
Ich schaue mir das in den Daten nochmal; und fahre da eigentlich täglich längst
Romwriter (2020-11-12 19:35:03+00:00): Hallo Claudius, unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2418688 gibt es eine "Note" zu dieser Bearbeitung. Möchtest Du dazu noch mehr schreiben als ich in der Note schon geschrieben habe?
highflyer74 (2020-11-17 08:13:58+00:00): Moin Claudius!

Könntest Du Dich hierzu noch kurz äussern?

Danke!
highflyer74 (2020-11-20 09:45:18+00:00): Hello Claudius! This CS has been commented on. Just in case you do not speak German you can answer in English as well...
highflyer74 (2020-12-01 06:49:32+00:00): Ich habe den Mapper heute nochmal per PN auf diese Diskussion hingewiesen.
Claudius Henrichs (2020-12-01 09:02:45+00:00): Danke highflyer74 für deine PN. Ich bin gerade dabei, für mehr Konsistenz und vor allem Dokumentation der Tags für Flughafeninfrastruktur zu sorgen. Dazu Besuche ich virtuell zahlreiche Flughäfen global, um das Tagging besser zu verstehen und Korrekturen vorzunehmen. Ich habe meine Änderung in Bremen evertiert, da ich vor einigen Wochen noch nach einem anderen Schema angepasst habe. Ich freue mich über Input zu dem Proposal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/runway%3Ddisplaced_threshold
mueschel (2020-10-31 19:27:40+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn das Tag "bike"? Das gibt es in OSM nicht.
mo465 (2020-11-01 19:42:50+00:00): Hallo,

Danke fürs drüberschauen. Da hab ich einen Fehler gemacht. Das Tag muss "bicycle" heißen. Ich habe aus dem Wiki den Vorschlag für eine temporäre Schließung übernommen: 

motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2018 May 22-2018 Oct 7)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions) 

aber das schließt ja Fahrräder nicht ein. Deshalb wollte ich Fahrräder mit "bicycle:conditional" einschließen, aber wohl "bike" geschrieben :/ 

Was meinst du? Kann man einfach auch access:conditional nehmen und motor_vehicle:conditional und bicycle:conditional weglassen?
mueschel (2020-11-01 19:53:38+00:00): motor_vehicle plus bicycle ergibt "vehicle".
Bei "access" sind natürlich noch Fußgänger, Pferde etc. dabei. Kommt auf die Situation vor Ort an.

motor_vehicle und bicycle getrennt getagged ist aber auch in Ordnung.
MFlamm (2020-11-03 08:38:07+00:00): Why did you update this bridge as a trunk and what is your source for doing so?
For your information, the swiss OSM community has adopted a very precise definition for trunk highways, based on local signage: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features
sovereign_ch (2020-11-03 16:17:22+00:00): @MFlamm: Thanks for pointing out. Reverted.
mariotomo (2021-08-03 15:08:42+00:00): hi. this is not particularly helpful you know … you should visit the place and realize what it really looks like.  it's a beautiful place btw.
user_5359 (2020-11-01 06:31:31+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the new tag Closed=yes ? Did you mean access=no?
eggie (2020-11-03 07:03:35+00:00): Hi Ali.. Why deleting a building and replace it by a node? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93311897
greetz,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-03 07:14:24+00:00): Landuse on top of landuse industrial?
Please don't!
eggie (2020-11-03 07:16:56+00:00): reverted by changeset  #93461549
user_5359 (2020-10-31 05:49:09+00:00): Hello! Please have have a look on node https://www.osm.org/node/8066798935. There is a mistake inside of the opening_hours value: You use St, did you mean Saturday (Sa) or Sunday (Su)?
alidemirtas (2020-10-31 13:25:44+00:00): Sorry, I meant Saturday.
eggie (2020-11-04 10:13:07+00:00): Hi Ali,
Why deleting buildings and replace them by nodes????????
We asked again and again.

gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-04 10:16:20+00:00): reverted by changeset #93533883
Frans S (2020-11-05 14:38:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
You connected nearly all buildings with nodes to highways>
this is erroneous mapping. 
Buidling nodes may not be connect to other features like highways.
DD1GJ (2020-10-31 00:38:27+00:00): Hello Ali, the german community is not pleased that you are deleting chimneys that are drawn in extremely precise positions and replacing them with a simple node at the wrong position. Also, the information about the height of the chimney was lost. What is the goal of your changes at OSM?
Ali Rouzbeh (2020-10-31 01:10:07+00:00): I think those deletions were done mistakenly. I'll keep an eye on the annotations you mentioned to make sure are not changed in the future.
Laitrip (2020-10-30 22:08:38+00:00): Changeset kommentar ist falsch. Richtig: Weg um Kirche St. Katharina ergänzt und ein paar Prüffehler korrigiert. Es gibt hier aber noch mehr zu tun...
Quelle ist nicht ESRI, sondern Vor-Ort-Begehung und GNSS, sowie Bayern (80cm)
Xevi (2020-10-31 18:27:53+00:00): You should review the changed elements of this changeset. The delted tag "name" at least in Spain is incorrect because the oficial name is used on the tag "name"
Uief003 (2020-11-26 08:35:47+00:00): Hello, for the name N-230, there were 2 names: a "name" and a "nom:es" . The two names were not basic identical and I was not responsible for that! I just wanted to add the french translation but with 2 names, there was a bug and my translation was deleted, that's why I had to change the name, I think the name:es was the real name. Sorry for this error... You can change it. For the french translation, there was also a bug with a name "Route du tunnel" between France and Vielha and it's not me who added it (there must be a mistake on the cartography)! Finally, if you see another user adding an error, please understand why he makes this error and don't criticize for free!
I assume I made a mistake due to cartographic and site errors but it would have been nice to try to find out why I made these errors instead of criticizing me!
jmaspons (2021-01-02 13:07:21+00:00): Many of the names you changed to names:es are in fact in occitan so it should go to name:oc. Further more, the default language (name tag) should be the Occitan one as it is the official main language and most of the traffic signals are in this language
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93312582
jmaspons (2021-01-17 15:45:04+00:00): I will revert the changeset if there are no news in some days
Uief003 (2021-02-20 08:03:52+00:00): I understand why it was difficult to translate it into French... Thank you for doing this.
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:12:32+00:00): Hi there, does https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6115515732 crossing not exist any more?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:30:37+00:00): 4000-4199
osm_poi_matchmaker (2020-10-30 22:38:12+00:00): 4600-4799
literan (2020-10-31 11:47:40+00:00): зачем вы рисуете дороги поверх существующих? откачу.

И второе - что это за "трасса"? трассы для разных  видов спорта рисуются, как правило, с помощью отношений type=route, в которые собираются существующие дороги/лыжни.
aharvey (2020-10-30 23:54:08+00:00): Hi could you please confirm your source for this? The signage from 2019 says this is "Taxis only" and directs "All other vehicles" away from this road https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gn1tchPjWyM9_AB6XGoi5Q
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-31 13:14:43+00:00): Agree with aharvey, although you can't really legally drop off in a private vehicle in this sort of area, the road itself isn't restricted as far as I'm aware.
aharvey (2020-11-01 01:15:07+00:00): There's a lift gate, not sure exactly what the mechanism is but it makes the road itself restricted to drive through even without doing a dropoff/pickup.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-01 01:52:51+00:00): Whoops, I stand corrected, I was talking about a different roadway
aharvey (2020-11-02 03:37:46+00:00): I didn't hear back so have reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93389097 based on the Mapillary imagery here, though I'm still interested to hear a reply back when you can with further information about your change.
mariotomo (2021-08-03 15:16:39+00:00): hola.  necesitas ayuda?  mira que el 
Way: 865481273 no es un edificio sino quizás un barrio.
user_5359 (2020-11-01 05:54:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4008119339 : You add the key currency:CH. Did you mean the Swiss franc currency? In this case the key would be currency:CHF.
tartiflex (2020-11-04 20:38:28+00:00): Thanks, it's fixed.
maro21 (2020-10-31 22:57:52+00:00): Dzięki
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:21+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:45:55+00:00): Handled in message
frosm (2020-11-04 23:42:28+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
j'avoue être incapable de compter le nombre d'arceaux sur les 2 imageries rue.
je ne comprend pas trop votre source : soit vous connaissez le lieu au point de connaître par cœur leur nombre, soit vous l'avez vu sur les photos, mais les 2 à la fois c'est original :)
Mais merci pour le correctif et bonne continuation
Baptiste Nouguier (2020-11-05 11:53:26+00:00): Bonjour et merci,
Je l'ai repéré sur les photos et j'ai vérifié sur place pour leur nombre. C'est pour cette raison que j'ai mis 2 sources mais je suis nouveau ici donc n'hésitez pas à me dire si l'usage est de privilégier une seule source.
Bonne continuation
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-02 07:13:42+00:00): hola 
confío en que lo está haciendo muy bien.
encontré una etiqueta innecesaria
así que elimino este polígono puente. el puente debe ahogarse como forma no poligonal también.
se refiere a 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge

gracias. feliz mape
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-02 07:13:54+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/865486653
BigKev97 (2023-04-24 13:28:44+00:00): Gracias.
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:24+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:46:04+00:00): Handled in message
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:07:46+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
Hb- (2020-10-31 10:17:54+00:00): Location source: https://twitter.com/khalfaguliyev/status/1322129278776070144
eggie (2020-11-01 09:47:49+00:00): Altijd weer lastig
Je hebt kindergarten gebruikt, maar het is hier van o tot 13
Dat klopt dus niet..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten

Je hebt ook childcare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare

Voor verschillende landen dekt de vlag de lading niet. 

Wat leesvoer dus..
Up to you!

MVG,
eggie
senorPepe (2020-11-01 13:49:05+00:00): Hi eggie,

Lastig ja. Bedankt voor het kijken.
Uit die links:

"This tag [am=kg] is also currently used for establishments where parents can leave their young children but which provide no formal education"
Dit is hier het geval, in vorm van crèche, na schoolse opvang en 24u opvang.

"The whole range of these facilities [crèche, preschool en naschoolse opvang]is tagged amenity=kindergarten, with min_age=* and max_age=* giving their precise age range. In 2016 it was proposed to add sub-tags for the three age categories, nursery=yes, preschool=yes and after_school=yes."
Nursery en after_school is hier van toepassing, vandaar de leeftijd tot 13 jaar. Crèche is slechts tot 2 of 3 jaar, dus de door mij opgegeen leeftijdgrens is misleidend.

"It is suggested a feature be tagged as a kindergarten when there is an overlap [met am=childcare]." 
Dit suggereert ook am=kg.

Aan de andere kant:
"This tag is used for places where children are looked after, including a nursery or daycare which takes care of small children who are too young for amenity=kindergarten or preschool, and after-school childcare facilities. "
Dit suggereert juist am=childcare te gebruiken.

Kan u dit beslechten? Iets voor in Forum?

Dank!
Gr senorPepe
eggie (2020-11-01 13:58:37+00:00): Up to you... Geef alleen maar aan dat ik het ook niet goed weet.
Op het Nederlandse forum kan ik niet zo snel een draadje vinden. 
Je kunt altijd advies vragen. 
Er is wel een site waarin je kunt kijken hoevaak een bepaalde tag wordt gebruikt. Schiet me even niet te binnen.
gr eggie
DressyPear4 (2020-10-31 15:49:25+00:00): Landuse corresponde ao conjunto, que já esta mapeado.
A edificação é building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93314988
user_5359 (2020-11-01 06:21:09+00:00): Hello! Please don’t forget to connect the waterways on the crossings.
Mashin (2020-10-31 01:52:50+00:00): Hi, did you want to do `man_made=bridge` instead of `building=yes`?
dadavid (2025-08-19 07:26:49+00:00): Hi, 

du hattest hier [1] "leisure=*" also wirklich mit Sternchen hinzugefügt. Das wurde mitlerweile durch eine neue Userin gefixt. Kannst du nochmal drüberschauen, ob das jetzt passt? 

happy mapping :) 

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31149905
Radbubi (2025-08-19 10:08:47+00:00): Hallo,
das war in der Tat ein Versehen, der Plätz hätte von mir eigentlich gar nicht bearbeitet werden sollen, da ich ihn gar nicht kenne. Daher kann ich auch nicht sagen, ob der aktuelle Tag besser ist oder der aus Version #1.
Grüße
rtbk (2020-10-31 13:16:56+00:00): Great Work - Looks like it is tagged properly
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:08:08+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SRASC (2020-10-31 20:35:35+00:00): Not sure why the recently completed Curepe Interchange was completely removed & reverted to its pre-built state. 

The satellite imagery available in OSM is not up to date as far as how this area looks now.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/10°38'04.7%22N+61°24'40.9%22W/@10.634637,-61.412566,457m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d10.6346366!4d-61.4113692
shows how it looks now & how the roads in OSM were mapped to reflect that, until these completely unnecessary deletions were made.