piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_11418917 (2021-10-30 14:41:23+00:00): Hello,       
Kirkuk is a provenance in northern Iraq, the capital of this state is the city Kirkuk, which have the same name.       
The 'name' tag now is in Arabic, previously it was in Kurdish, which is wrong due to the population of the Kurds are only 1/4 and not more than 1/3 definitely.       
The history of the provenance was in the 50s the Kurds was 2/1 the Arabs, but in the 70s the provenance had changed a bit, the kurdish parts become a part of Erbil and Sulaymaniyah, 2 providence which have majority Kurds, and Kirkuk had new parts of Nineveh, and Saladin, 2 providence which have majority Arabs,     So in the 1977 census, the Arabs become The majority, and in the latest census that happened 20 years ago, the population of Kirkuk was 752,745 people, the Arabs were 544,596, And the Kurds were 155,861, the Turkmen were 50,099 and others were 2,189, So the Arabs are 72% and the Kurds are 21%.        
After the invasion in 2003, the Kurdistan regional government captured Kirkuk and began a Kurdification for the whole provenance, the Changed the name of the City from Tam'm to Kirkuk, and they push thousands of Kurds to live in Kirkuk so it have more kurds in etc..      
Kirkuk now is not part of the Kurdistan region, it never was, it was under control of the kurds from 2003 to 2017, it's under the Iraqi government control since 2017 when the Iraqi forces liberated it back after Mosul.         
The name should be in Arabic since around %75 of the population are Arabs, and the other %25 are between Kurds, Turkmen, Assyrians, Chaldean, Syriac, Yazidis, Shabak and others.       
The name tag should represent the language the people who live in the city use, speak and write with.     
Best Regards,
Hevał (2021-10-30 16:43:27+00:00): I have a simple question:
How did the Kurds won 6 out the 12 seats in Kerkûk during the recent election in Iraq if they were only a minority in this province as you claim? 
Best Wishes.
user_11418917 (2021-10-30 17:09:43+00:00): Dear Heval,     
I see you are a Kurd, and you should know the facts really well.  The name should be in the language of the people who live there, the language they speak and the language they read.    
In Kirkuk every Kurd can speak and read  the Arabic while Arabs don’t know Kurdish.    
About the election question you asked, indeed it’s very simple, and the answer is that Everyone can vote for any candidate in their circle, this is the latest voting law, this is how the “Babilion Movment” won, they say that they are a “Christian party” but 99% of the votes they got are from Muslims, this is just an example of this law.   
The Arabs in Kirkuk voted for Kurds politicians because you know when Kirkuk was under the Kurds rule it had better infrastructure etc..      
at the end as I said before, “ The name should be in Arabic since around %75 of the population are Arabs, and the other %25 are between Kurds, Turkmen, Assyrians, Chaldean, Syriac, Yazidis, Shabak and others. 
The name tag should represent the language the people who live in the city use, speak and write with.”     
I’m not an Arab, just like you, but here in OSM we need to map correctly.    
best regards.
Hevał (2021-10-30 18:25:30+00:00): Where did you get that information that every Kurd in Kerkûk can speak arabic?
and i think you should let the people decide what language they’re speaking,wouldn’t that be more fair in your opinion?
user_11418917 (2021-10-30 18:46:10+00:00): Dear Havel, I’ve been in Kirkuk so many time, I’ve spent weeks their while I was working with the UN. I’ve met people and visited almost all the districts in Kirkuk, every Kurdish people I’ve met was speaking Arabic with us.  I’m not sure if you’ve been in kirkuk or not, but if you’ve been their, you should’ve know this already.    
If you want the name be in Kurdish you must provide sources that justify the name be in Kurdish, otherwise the Name should be in Arabic since it’s the language of 75% of the population and it’s the language that 100% of the population can read and speak with.    
Best regards.
Hevał (2021-10-31 15:17:03+00:00): You didn’t provide me any sources to backup your words but since you’ve heard some words that doesn’t your ideology you want me to do so?
Have you ever asked yourself why can they speak arabic while you can’t speak theirs? Simply, because of the arabization that took place in the province many years ago during the baathis regime rule, it was that time when they changed the name from Kerkûk to Ta’amim, it’s ok if you didn’t know this, you’re just a guest here.
At the end i just want to say: 
“Zimanê me Hebûna me ye”

P.S my name is Hevał not Havel! lol
user_11418917 (2021-11-01 00:19:21+00:00): Dear @Hevał,          
    
The latest population census for Kirkuk stated the Kurds are only 21% of the total population of Kirkuk, While the Arabs are 72%.        
And as I said above, all the Kurds in Kirkuk speak Arabic, While not all of the Arabs speak Kurdish.        
The naming of the 'name' tag should be in the language the people speak and read in that area, please read the naming guidelines of OSM. Ethnicity doesn't matter, the speaking language matter.       
         
And I already know about the history of Kirkuk, you don't need to tell me that it had more Kurds in the past, I already know that and it's a fact nobody can deny, but that was in 50s, the Kurds were 45%, while the Arabs were only %30 of the entire population, after that the Ba'ath regime exiled the Kurds of the capital city and redrawn the whole provenance of Kirkuk letting the Kurdish villages joins Erbil and Sulaymaniyah providence, and by this, the Arabs become the majority, the same thing happened after 2003 when the Kurdish regional government sent thousands to live in Kirkuk and renamed roads, parks, schools, and almost everything and pushed Kurdish politicians to rule it in exchange for a political benefit with the Shiite parties at the south etc..      
In 2017 the Iraqi government forces toke it back after liberate Mosul, and now it's under the Iraqi government control, this is on top of what I said in the first part of this comment, therefore the Name should be in the speaking language of the people.           
Best regards.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-04 10:21:07+00:00): To both of you - just changing the name back and forth will achieve nothing in the long term.

Perhaps someone can post references to local signage?
user_11418917 (2021-11-04 10:59:11+00:00): Dear Someone else, Since 2017 very road sign is in Kirkuk is being change back now to Arabic, but there is still few Kurdish road signs in some major roads still haven't been changed yet.       
All will properly be changed back to Arabic in the couple few years (it take so much time to do things in Iraq), but currently the majority of road signs are in Arabic, last time I was there was pre covid.         
You can read more about the Kurdification of Kirkuk here:    
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirkuk#Kurdification_and_human_rights_abuses                
Putting the name in Kurdish is absolutely wrong cause the Arabs here are 5 times more than kurds.     And the name should be in a language everyone can read and speak, which is 100% of the Kirkuk population, the kurdish language are spoken by the majority of the kurds in Kirkuk, not even all of them!       
Also please read the stats I provided above especially the census numbers.        
Thank you and regards.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-17 12:53:43+00:00): Thanks.  Just for info, I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113527018 as well.
Cascafico (2021-11-04 08:48:59+00:00): building offset correction based on Bing, while Mapbox, Maxar and ESRI consistent with old building version
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113104586
Cyber Alert Red (2021-11-08 20:07:53+00:00): You destroyed https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/252382626 – please revert!
Becky Candy (2021-11-09 08:24:37+00:00): hello Cyber Alert Red, checked the changeset it looks fine @ Sandhya364 modified the landuse by moving the nodes, what was destroyed?? Thank you
ovruni (2021-10-29 05:07:56+00:00): Hola nuevamente, en este conjunto de cambios tambien se han agregado algunos edificios ficticios, otros que esta como usos de suelo y edificios a la vez. Puede ver los comentarios que le he dejado en http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6531688
Saludos
ovruni (2021-10-29 05:14:17+00:00): Por otra parte, en esta zona al igual que varias zonas rurales la imagen mas actual es la imagen de Maxar.
Saludos
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
5m4u9 (2022-10-03 03:11:31+00:00): hola, no estoy muy seguro que "shingle" sea un valor correcto para el lecho del río rocha en sacaba, si para torrenteras. por el flujo del agua y vegetación creo que sería mejor wetland=marsh...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dmarsh
JJIglesias (2022-10-04 03:37:56+00:00): Cambialo si asi te parece. Mi duda es si ese wetland es permanente, si tal es el caso pues ponlo como wetland. No veo problema en eso.
Saludos
JJ
aharvey (2021-11-24 08:21:35+00:00): Hi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:privacy is not a standard tag, the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access tag looks like a better fit. access=yes can be used to indicate public access is permitted, though usually not added as assumed by default, it's still fine to add it to be explict.

As for removing the uluru climb, I think it's a good idea to leave it in but potentially change from disused to removed or was https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix if chains have been removed now. This helps prevent it being re-added and can be useful for research purposes.
aharvey (2021-11-25 21:50:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227348319/history you've tagged privacy=public but it was originally mapped as access=private. Is that road open to the public or restricted?
aharvey (2021-11-25 21:51:58+00:00): I've re-tagged these using the standard access=yes tag.
aharvey (2021-11-25 21:57:34+00:00): I've reinstored the Uluru Climb using the was lifecycle prefix to indicate that it's not there anymore but was. Useful for other mappers and some data consumers for the time being.
ovruni (2021-10-29 05:37:34+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de manera similar al conjunto de cambios 113102522, donde también ya le he escrito he notado que hay edificios ficticios.
Saludos
Cascafico (2021-11-04 08:48:31+00:00): not actually wrong; inconsistency between imagery providers raise some buildings offset issues
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113107048
aharvey (2021-11-23 12:15:50+00:00): hi your change here removed natural=bare_rock (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=bare%20rock) from Kata Tjuṯa (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/7474225). I've re-instated it.
nevw (2021-10-29 09:56:27+00:00): Hi
you have added a building tag to the property boundary. I have changed the tag for this area to landuse=retail and moved a few of the tags to the mall building footprint.
nevw (2021-10-29 10:02:36+00:00): The se end of this building does not match the Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) and I can't see any imagery for the building using DCS NSW imagery.
nevw (2021-10-29 10:10:25+00:00): I think you may have used MapBox satellite imagery and this does depict what could be building as you have mapped, maybe built since the Maxar imagery?
maraf24 (2022-01-11 10:39:40+00:00): amenity=kindergarten
aharvey (2021-11-24 08:17:38+00:00): From what I can tell most of these roads had correct classifications already (especially the service, residential ones). Tertiary when not within a city is usually for roads which link smaller towns and villages.
ortho_is_hot (2021-11-25 01:49:53+00:00): Also the roads here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757861362 are probably better off as service or unclassified imo
aharvey (2021-11-25 21:46:40+00:00): I reverted this as these are still mostly service roads and not tertiary and the one segment added already existed as a track so became a duplicate. Please feel free to discuss further here.
Cascafico (2021-11-04 08:47:52+00:00): old imagery used, so buildings created on new road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113107847
Mordechai23 (2021-10-29 14:55:07+00:00): Cześć, dziękujemy za dodanie swojego lokalu do OSM! Pozwoliłem sobie uzupełnić i poprawić informacje o punkcie, pozdrawiam ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:04:42+00:00): Added buildings
nevw (2021-10-29 09:27:02+00:00): Hi
shop=furniture for Aroma Joil does not seem to me to be correct for the products you advertise.
nevw (2021-10-29 10:23:02+00:00): Could shop=perfumery be close?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dperfumery
Robert Bui (2021-10-29 12:27:48+00:00): No. The shop sells a mixture of home furniture, home decors, scented candles, giftware, etc. The majority of products are classified under Homes & Garden Products inside Google.
nevw (2021-10-29 20:33:33+00:00): Ok, thanks Robert.
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:07:21+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:07:33+00:00): Added buildings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Erick tamba (2021-11-04 18:20:02+00:00): Added buildings
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 12:59:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846405252/history has S=unpaved key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
DK7080BE (2021-10-29 08:40:23+00:00): Du har lagt stien oveni Kjærsigvej på dette vejstykke. Hvis du frakobler punktet der hvor vejen slår et knæk, og flytter det lidt, kan du se at der er både en sti og en vej. Man frakobler ved at højreklikke over punktet og vælge »frakobl«
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
user_14250389 (2021-10-29 08:28:17+00:00): 抱歉，不知为何与您编辑冲突了，或许是因为同时编辑这块区域
我的变更集为
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113112321#map=12/40.0443/116.0907
还望您能检查一下您所编辑之区域，有无遗漏之处。为给您带来的这份困扰表示十分抱歉！
Vinber (2021-10-29 13:44:17+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour la correction de la note, j'avais oublié :)

j'ai remis le landuse=residential sur la surface correspondant à Araux et changé le nom de la route également, je suppose qu'elle contenait la même faute d'orthographe.

Bonne journée
shanhulittle (2021-10-29 11:39:27+00:00): 哈哈，巧了。我看了应该没什么问题
mapperue (2023-06-12 15:20:54+00:00): Ahoj, ako názov u mostov sa uvádzajú oficiálne názvy. Rôzne vymyslené názvy presúvam do značky popis.
vmicho (2023-06-13 20:40:01+00:00): ??? Ktory? kde?
mapperue (2023-06-14 06:19:15+00:00): Napríklad tento most, ktorý mal názov "bridge Bystrica (Sukromny)". 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13382062
Je to opis mosta, nie jeho názov. Naviac je v názve anglické a slovenské slovo. Pri anglickom názve sa používa tag name:en.
Viac o tom ako sa používa tag "name" je tu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Ďalší názov bol "bridge Bystrica x Hamor"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15068165
Je to tiež len opis mosta a preto sa používa tag description.
vmicho (2023-06-14 21:28:57+00:00): Jaj, ale to nie je nazov mosta , ale relacie, to ani vo vyhladavaci nehlada. Tam sa moze napisat cokolvek (napr. "x5$$ru looper ganja", to je len na spojenie do relacie, aby to nebolo bez mena.
mapperue (2023-06-15 07:43:33+00:00): Je to relácia type=bridge. Viac o názvoch pri takýchto reláciách tu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:bridge
Luzandro (2025-03-03 07:41:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4646305
RaccoonFederation (2021-10-29 08:32:05+00:00): Source was Local Knowledge
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Adalberto D'Alessandri (2021-10-29 08:40:40+00:00): giro ad anello di circa 18 km con partenza e arrivo a Campaegli. strada binca/sterrata con pendenze facili e solo brevi tratti con pendenze al 5,6%
ovruni (2021-10-29 17:39:04+00:00): Hola, varios de tus conjuntos de cambios contienen el texto "modificaciones", lo cual no brinda suficiente información al resto de la comunidad sobre los cambios realizados, puedes encontrar mayor información en la sección sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Saludos
Mammi71 (2022-07-08 13:35:16+00:00): Hallo Karlograf,
bist Du Dir sicher, dass dieses Gebäude abandoned=yes ist, also aufgegeben wurde und verwahrlost ist? Du hast den Building-Type über StreetComplete eingegeben, was hattest Du dort wie beantwortet bzw. als Antwort ausgewählt? Ich frage deshalb so explizit, weil dies auch ein Fehler von StreetComplete sein könnte. Un ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass hier eine Pumpstation aufgegeben wurde.
Robert Whittaker (2021-11-05 13:11:20+00:00): Hi,

It looks like you've changed the address of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5619417432 in this changeset, but haven't updated the position of the node. Could you move it to the correct place on the map? (Presumably it's somewhere around https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/53.71981/-0.45933 .)
Robert Whittaker (2021-12-07 18:39:05+00:00): In the absence of a response here, I've done my best to move https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5619417432 to a more appropriate location, based on the address.
luiswoo (2021-10-29 16:03:38+00:00): Что значит "просто так"?
ezekielf (2021-11-01 16:24:25+00:00): Why restore this?  Seems like a historical artifact that would be more appropriate for https://openhistoricalmap.org
aixbrick (2021-10-30 08:36:46+00:00): Hallo,
bitte beschäftige dich mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix. Solange die Gebäude noch auf Luftbildern oder in ALKIS sichtbar sind, ist ein löschen nicht sinnvoll. Der nächste Mapper erstellt sie wieder neu, weil er denkt, sie fehlen. Die Eissporthalle, die du in einem anderen Changeset gelöscht hast, war übrigens bereits so gemappt.
Ich habe die Gebäude wiederhergestellt und entsprechend getaggt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113151906.
Gruß
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Dino Michelini (2021-10-29 18:02:43+00:00): Caro Adalberto ho cancellato quanto mappato in questo changeset perché sbagliato nei contenuti e nelle geometrie. Capisco il furore nel voler mappare ma OSM è un progetto serio; questo significa che prima di mappare è necessario apprendere i rudimenti altrimenti si commettono errori come questi. Per questo se non vuoi che si cancelli altri errori grossolani ti invito a seguire un breve corso https://learnosm.org/it/ e a studiare la wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.
marczoutendijk (2021-10-29 12:51:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170, 113035171, 113035172, 113035175, 113035176, 113035178, 113035179, 113035181, 113035183, 113035186, 113035188, 113035190, 113035191, 113035195, 113035197, 113035200, 113056543, 113056548, 113056551, 113056553, 113056557, 113056560, 113056562, 113056566, 113056570, 113056573, 113056578, 113056580, 113056582, 113056583, 113056585, 113056591.
marczoutendijk (2021-10-29 12:51:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170, 113035171, 113035172, 113035175, 113035176, 113035178, 113035179, 113035181, 113035183, 113035186, 113035188, 113035190, 113035191, 113035195, 113035197, 113035200, 113056543, 113056548, 113056551, 113056553, 113056557, 113056560, 113056562, 113056566, 113056570, 113056573, 113056578, 113056580, 113056582, 113056583, 113056585, 113056591.
Allroads (2021-10-31 15:25:24+00:00): Mooi, dat je dat aan geeft, op moment van sluiting, als het verhuurd wordt aan een ander met een shop dan shop=yes van maken en je name= verwijderen.
Succes met je volgende activiteit.
UrSuS (2021-12-25 11:39:58+00:00): Don't move path so far from Coastline!!!
chris66 (2026-06-14 08:14:19+00:00): ich habs überarbeitet.