piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Svalbard (2017-11-09 19:30:38+00:00): Hallo Schneider11,

Du bist ja sehr aktiv bei der Darstellung des Schulgeländes des JHGs in OpenStreetMap(OSM).

Leider verwendest Du, um bestimmte Elemente auf der Karte darzustellen, Eigenschaften, die diese Elemente gar nicht besitzen bzw. dessen Definition nicht zutrifft.

Es gibt dafür in OSM die Redewendung "Taggen für den Renderer". Was das genau bedeutet, kannst Du hier [1] nachlesen.

Du hast Dich sicherlich schon gewundert, warum Deine Objekte "natural=yes", die Du für Bäume/Baukronen verwendet hast, nicht auf der Standardkarte dargestellt werden. Das liegt daran, dass diese key/value-Kombination nicht definiert ist und deshalb ein Renderer diese nicht auswertet und darstellt. Besser wäre z. B. "natural=tree", wenn man dann so ins Detail gehen möchte (Micro-Mapping). Diiese Kombination sollte allerdings nur für signifikante Bäume genutzt werden [2].

Weiterhin wird von Dir "natural=bare_rock" nicht korrekt verwendet [3]. Daneben gibt es noch weitere Unstimmigkeiten: Übereinanderlegen von Flächen, Eintragen von "landuse=quarry" [4], die es auf dem Schulgelände sicherlich nicht gibt.

Bei OSM handelt es sich vordringlich um eine Datenbank, in der Geoinformationen erfasst werden. Die Darstellung dieser Geoinformationen in Form einer Karte ist quasi nur ein "Abfallprodukt".

Mit Deinen Eintragungen verfälscht Du die Gegebenheiten vor Ort. Wer z. B. aus der OSM-Datenbank auswerten möchte, wo es überall Steinbrüche [4] in der (OSM-)Welt gibt, wird sich wundern, wenn er auf dem Schulgelände Steinbrüche mit  Flächen von wenigen Quadratmetern findet.

Bitte passe Deine Eintragungen entsprechend an oder lösche sie.

Vielleicht kannst Du auch Kontakt zu dem Mapper "Helmut Kauer" [5] aufnehmen, der in Traunreut schon länger in OSM aktiv ist und von ihm Tipps fürs korrekte Mappen bekommen.

Gruß

Svalbard

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dtree
[3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dbare_rock
[4] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dquarry
[5] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Helmut%20Kauer
user_5359 (2017-11-05 18:41:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
highflyer74 (2018-03-12 06:59:23+00:00): Ich nehme an, dass Du hier "Strand" schreiben wolltest. Ich glaube nicht, dass am Ende dieser Straße ein Denkmal mit dem Namen "Strand" steht und habe es deshalb entfernt. Bitte befasse Dich vor weiteren Edits mit den Grundlagen von OSM. Siehe dazu die von mir in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57074932 verlinkten Hinweise. Danke!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
GerdP (2017-11-06 08:23:07+00:00): Hi!
A ford is mapped with ford=yes, please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53548014
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
Chris Fleming (2017-11-07 16:17:59+00:00): Hi thanks for this, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edit looks great, but for future reference I've made some small changes, I've set it be a highway path and have also joined it up to Maryhill Road assuming this was your intention. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers
Chris
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-11-13 11:32:31+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "Amen Place = yes"? This node has neither a physical nor a name tag. Could you work on the tagging here?
Cheers, Jan
ivanbranco (2022-07-02 20:04:51+00:00): Hi Andy, I see you're still active. Do you know how this node can be fixed?
opendcc (2017-11-05 18:35:52+00:00): Hello,

please don't expand your changeset to a such large area, use a smaller bounding box (or save earlier).

best regards
goedegazelle (2017-11-06 10:24:02+00:00): The editing order is not geographically, so the only thing that I could do is to save the edits separatedly, but that makes it unmanageable for myself. I don't know how to prevent that and at the same time I don't see the problem with large editing areas.
goedegazelle (2017-11-08 07:00:42+00:00): @opendcc
In these edits I have only changed tags. It is probably best to view them with history.
Regards.
MatachinBruster (2017-11-07 20:30:45+00:00): ¿Por qué cambiaste el nombre? El nombre de las calles era correcto
Pataca (2017-11-07 21:50:16+00:00): Porque la wiki de OSM recomienda poner la referencia y la Xunta identifica la carretera con ese nombre, aunque sean correctos en vías interurbanas generan confusión.
https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/2017/20170526/AnuncioG0424-040517-0008_gl.html

En la wiki también recomienda incorporar otros nombres si existen pero no en el principal para que no lo renderice en el mapa. Otra opción sería marca el nombre como "paraje" a un lado.

Saludos
Pataca (2017-11-07 22:04:15+00:00): De todos modos, si prefieres ponerlo por mi adelante. Sin problemas. 

Un saludo
MatachinBruster (2017-11-08 10:47:53+00:00): Yo es que soy cartero en Ares desde hace un tiempo, y a la zona de Chanteiro, Lubre el concello lo cambió todo de nombre así que intento hacer un mapa lo mas actualizado posible. Lo de Estrada de Lubre lo veo claro pero igual lo de Pipela o A Queira hay que darle una vuelta. Lo pongo así para que se vea a simple vista y funcione mejor con el OSMand. Lo de DP-0402 es lo que veo como nombre oficial.
Pataca (2017-11-08 16:08:13+00:00): Perfecto, yo la duda que tengo es sí esas carreteras se consideran calles, o aunque se les asigne un nombre por razones administrativas no deja de ser un "lugar" o "paraje". Pero en cualquier caso, si manejas información actualizada perfecto, lo dejo a tu decisión.

Saludos.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Alexander-II (2017-12-02 21:20:00+00:00): А вот игровая площадка - это что? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538572497 Это детская игровая? Или это спортивное поле? Или что-то еще?
m-faktor (2017-12-02 21:53:17+00:00): Это детская игровая площадка на придомовой территории, огороженная назамкнутым забором на северо-западе и северо-востоке. Автостоянка упирается в забор. Если бы это было спортивное поле, я так бы и сказал.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ElliottPlack (2023-11-27 22:42:05+00:00): hey there, question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345325942

A few years back you'd marked it as no pedestrians allowed. Is that accuracte. It certainly looks to be a horse trail (bridleway) but I don't see anything from NPS saying if peds are expressly prohibited. Thanks!
miha12 (2023-11-28 03:32:33+00:00): Hi, I checked the changeset. It looks like I accidentally copied tags from another object. So, this should be foot=yes. 
Thanks.
ElliottPlack (2023-11-28 19:04:47+00:00): Very good. Thank you for looking into it.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
taxi301 (2017-11-06 08:44:43+00:00): Witam . Czy building:part został podzielony na kawałki celowo ? czy przypadek , teraz się nie wyświetla w 3D
Paradox_PSP (2017-11-08 09:33:46+00:00): przez przypadek
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Владимир К (2018-01-20 08:44:42+00:00): кладбище отмечено, удаляю. Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны.
eggie (2017-11-05 20:48:59+00:00): Probeer het gebied van je edits wat kliener te houden. In die edit rechtsonder zit de landuse in de knoop. Ik kijk even.
eggie (2017-11-05 21:06:19+00:00): De landuse grass heb ik geheel hier uit de knoop gehaald. Je kunt niet zomaar met de nodes schuiven. Dan gaat het fout.
Graag reactie.
Gatsybah (2017-11-07 12:29:00+00:00): De grootte van het gebied komt doordat OSM vroeg of ik oudere veranderingen nog wilde herstellen. Ik had al eerder aangegeven dat het genegeerd kon worden maar het werd opnieuw gevraagd en toen heb ik het verbeterd.

TOV de landuse zal ik in de toekomst gewoon opnieuw velden uitmappen, excuus.
eggie (2017-11-07 12:43:23+00:00): Oke... duidelijk mapse verder
Er wordt je overigens niks kwalijk genomen. Schroom niet om iets te vragen. dat kan ook op het forum van OSM https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
emvee (2019-08-24 12:39:27+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,

Jij lijkt bekend te zijn op de Claes de Vrieselaan en ik zat naar wat Zwaerdecroonstraat te kijken. Die kruising is nu een fietspad met 2 bollards maar als ik op Mapillary kijk (minmin1972) en PDOK dan is het volgens mij gewoon een weg ook voor autoverkeer.

Heb ik het mis?

Groeten,

Martin.
Jeroen Muris (2019-08-26 16:17:32+00:00): Hallo Martin,

Ik heb de situatie niet voor ogen, maar zal er binnenkort eens langs lopen.

Gr. Jeroen
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
AsgerFrank (2017-11-06 10:28:37+00:00): Det er rart for andre hvis der står hvorfor.
juliaboy (2017-11-07 08:55:01+00:00): Forklaringen er at jeg igennem et halvt år er løbet henad den tilstødende sti og ventet på at den skulle forsvinde af sig selv - og nu tog jeg mig endelig sammen til at fjerne den
Hjart (2017-11-07 10:02:09+00:00): Der er desværre kun et meget begrænset antal aktive bidragsydere på Sjælland, så man kan ikke umiddelbart regne med at stier mm "forsvinder af sig selv". Desuden er det som Asger gør opmærksom på, rart for os andre hvis man lige giver en lille forklaring. Specielt hvis man lige logger ind og sletter et eller andet.
sergeybe (2018-02-09 14:04:09+00:00): Как вы представляете пикник на водной глади? Точка ставиться на место для пикника, а не на озеро.
highflyer74 (2018-03-12 06:51:41+00:00): Auch dieser Burger King ist am Gebäude erfasst. Der von Dir positionierte Node liegt auf der Straße. Desweiteren bitte ich um Beachtung von Groß- und Kleinschreibung. Ich entferne den Doppeleintrag wieder.
Luzandro (2024-12-06 12:06:06+00:00): Hallo,

du hast vor Jahren zahlreiche traffic_sign=city_limit + traffic_sign:forward/backward=yes angelegt, wo traffic_sign:forward/backward wohl auf direction=forward/backward geändert werden sollte

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#On_nodes
gebux (2024-12-07 13:59:43+00:00): Ich hab das Tagging bei den steirischen Ortstafeln angepasst. Hab damals glaub ich nur nachgemacht was ich bei anderen Ortstafeln gesehen habe.
Supaplex (2017-11-06 10:02:51+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-06 19:47:28+00:00): I don't see how a link about the Israel-Palestine conflict is relevant in OSM. Politics in general are not part of OSM. Could you explain the reasoning behind this link?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-06 19:52:22+00:00): This is your second politically motivated Israeli edit. The first being https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/53287766
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-08 17:46:19+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53617110
geri-oc (2018-04-17 17:56:50+00:00): Du löschst und verschiebst nach Webatlas SN, der aber nicht mit den WMS Luftbild SN  übereinstimmt. Damit legst du Wege auf Ackerflächen und residential über tatsächliche Ackerfläche. Schade das so vieles kaputt gemacht wurde . Die Gaststätte Berghof in Schellerhau ist total falsch eingetragen, so das sogar Urlauber Notes erstellen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1331522#map=14/50.7702/13.7141&layers=N

Hast du einmal gesehen, dass 20 % deiner Arbeiten Löschungen der Arbeit andere Mapper sind?
http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?M_Kucha
4004 (2017-11-05 20:40:45+00:00): здравствуйте,
там разве и на пешеходной части столбы?
Аndrey (2017-11-06 06:06:46+00:00): Со стороны Ожешко - да (на одной стороне блок, на другой дерево):
https://images.vfl.ru/ii/1509948024/b7921675/19299727.jpg
Виленская - только на проезжей части.
4004 (2017-11-06 22:10:51+00:00): собственно, поэтому линию на виленской я уберу, а на ожешко соединю с тротуаром
keujfl839237 (2017-11-05 20:29:45+00:00): source: areal imagery
Hb- (2017-11-23 18:24:06+00:00): On all storage tanks in the factory like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538589784 content=òil is set. Why not the English word oil?
JJIglesias (2017-11-06 07:50:28+00:00): Las Aceras son Implicitas en los bordes de las calles pues las escalas NO permiten estan dibujando las aceras, en Plazas, parques y demas lugares donde hayan camineras SI es logico colocar las aceras, de resto es cargar el mapa de informacion NO practica. Gracias
bxl-forever (2020-08-14 11:39:39+00:00): Hello,
I have already reported this on other changesets but we really have a problem with your contributions.
1) You uploaded a huge changeset at once, covering about 1/4 of the whole Brussels Region.  Some people might wonder whether you really surveyed such a big territory in one shot.
2) Every time you added a speed, you told your app to make it look like if there was a roadsign on the street (in Belgium a C43 sign, it looks like a red circle with a number).  On the contrary, most speeds in Brussels are either large 30-kph zones or, when it’s 50 kph, it is because it is the default speed, not because of a sign.  As a consequence, we can no longer reliably know what streets really have signs, when you keep adding non-existing signs to the database.  StreetComplete is a nice and user-friendly app but please read a little about how to use it properly.
3) Many speeds you typed are wrong.  There are many large 30-kph zones in Brussels and you must really know what you are doing if you want to add maxspeeds.  No data is better than wrong data.  Other mappers and myself have been spending countless hours debugging the mess with wrong speeds you added.  There is an option in StreetComplete to turn some quests off, I will strongly suggest you do that.
Best regards.
keithonearth (2018-11-20 19:02:51+00:00): here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259486983/history) is an example of another building that contains multiple addresses, but only had one placed on the outline. I have not found any examples yet of any buildings with two or more addresses that you've done anything other than just put one address on the building outline. 

This is an error, and one that is hard to find, so hard to fix.
Joe E (2017-12-27 19:46:12+00:00): Please confirm these are valid edits and reference your sources.
keithonearth (2017-11-05 22:06:33+00:00): I wanted to be honest about the quality of the data I based this edit on, but please do not remove the trails, I'm confident they are more or less accurate, and I want to do a bike tour in this area next summer. It'd be good if my route was in Osmand, and I can adjust the trace, and add more detailed tags at that time.
chillly (2017-11-08 11:20:11+00:00): THis is a mechanical edit, and against the mechanical edit rules. This MUST be discussed BEFORE you make these edits. I recommend this is reverted, then discussed and only if agreement is reached, make an edit like this.
Hb- (2017-11-08 13:38:49+00:00): Hi chillly, 
thanks for your comment. Replacing "substance=sewer" etc. with "substance=sewage" did not seem appropriate for a longer discussion. Please recommend a place (URL) to discuss edits like this in the future.
chillly (2017-11-08 13:53:28+00:00): The fact you don't think the edit was important enough to discuss just shows how opinions differ. Mechanical edits upset mappers. Mappers are our most precious resource. See the rules here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

You can start discussions on IRC or mailing lists. More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels