piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rab (2020-08-30 13:08:54+00:00): Hallo,
ich würde es so machen ->

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dworks

Einen neue Fläche zeichnen und das Multipolygon wieder löschen. 
Du hast dich bei der Lagekorrektur auch am Schattenwurf orientiert. Dadurch wurden einige Winkel etwas verzogen.
seyfeb (2020-08-30 13:53:22+00:00): Hi! Danke fuer das Review. Ich habe versucht deine Tips einzubauen. Vielleicht koenntest du es dir einmal anschauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90146063
Bei den Aussenkanten habe ich mich an dem Bing-Satellitenfoto orientiert und versucht die perspektivische Verzerrung zu beruecksichtigen.
rab (2020-08-30 17:54:13+00:00): Maxar scheint eine recht gute Draufsicht zu bieten. Ich habe mal versucht die Fläche des Firmengeländes zu erraten.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842443032
seyfeb (2020-08-30 18:55:23+00:00): Jetzt verstehe ich, wie du es meintest. Zusaetzlich zu den einzelnen Gebaeudeteilen noch ein Polygon fuer das gesamte Gelaende einzeichnen! Allerdings weiss ich sicher, dass der Teil am nordoestlichen Rand zu Georg SB Waschplaetze gehoert, deswegen habe ich diesen wieder rausgenommen (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90153822). Die Maxar Bilder liegen eindeutig nicht auf den Bing Satellitenbildern. Welche Daten haben denn normalerweise hoehere Genauigkeit? Gibt’s da ne Regelung, woran man sich orientieren sollte? Ich haette jetzt Bing gedacht, das es die Standardeinstellung im iD Editor ist.
rab (2020-08-30 19:14:19+00:00): Einen gewissen Versatz haben alle Hindergrundbilder. Das ist normalerweise aber kein Problem. Die Karte funktioniert auch ohne amtliche Genauigkeit. Es wird empfohlen den Hintergrund an die bestehenden Daten anzupassen. Das kann aber bei sehr gebirgigen Regionen schnell lästig werden.
seyfeb (2020-08-30 21:03:10+00:00): Das stimmt wohl. Danke fuer den Tip!
trigpoint (2020-08-30 16:56:06+00:00): Hi, you seem to have created a very large building that covers the gardens here.

Cheers Phil
tguen (2020-09-05 06:06:51+00:00): Hi GITNE, I noticed this changeset because it caused Osmose to show a few new issues. In case you're not aware, the access=permissive tag actually changes the access for all types of traffic, even on a footway. Check out the "Transport mode restrictions" section of this page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

The access tag should be replaced with foot=permissive. Don't sweat it though, everyone make mistakes. :)
GITNE (2020-09-05 08:49:20+00:00): Yes, I am aware that `access` sets the legal access for all modes of transportation, including `foot`. You see, the ways I have tagged `access=permissive` are on private retail property. In this case the property owner grants anybody—the general public—access to the roads and property provided that they adhere to the rules and regulations set forth for using the property. This includes pedestrians or trespassers on foot.

In short, the semantics of `permissive` in OSM is that access is granted to the general public but the owner or proprietor can revoke access at any time. This is different to objects, mostly OSM ways, which are tagged with `access=public` or no `access` tag (which defaults to `access=yes` or `access=public`). No `access` tag, `access=public`, or `access=yes` means that the object is in **public space**. Often this means that the object modeled by the OSM data is state owned, like public roads for example. But, state owned does not necessarily imply a public space. Take military installations for example, which mostly are state owned and operated but where no general public access is granted. So, since `access=yes` is the default there is also no need to tag public roads explicitly, however private roads and property with general public access needs to mapped with `access=permissive`.
KarmaCleaner (2020-08-30 15:11:31+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OSM.

Per inserire i massi a blocco della strada, usa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock
in tal modo puoi anche definire se si può passare in bici/moto od altro, per esempio
bicycle=yes/no, motor_veheicle=yes/no, foot=yes/no  ecc. 
Sposta pure da "name" a "note" le descrizioni
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90145172
rarad74 (2020-08-31 07:34:32+00:00): Hello.  I think you again damaged or deactivated some poligons. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90145414#map=13/44.4490/25.9636
FvGordon (2020-08-31 19:02:07+00:00): This area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842372904 was part of a larger residential area east of this area overlapping with a self intersecting railway landuse. I combined the railway areas to get a closed loop.
Can you point to some damaged polygons, which are e.g. no longer a closed loop.
rarad74 (2020-09-01 20:05:52+00:00): Here is a possible problem - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/44.4239/25.9308 and here where tilles still updating https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90145414#map=13/44.6561/25.7356
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-11-30 03:36:22+00:00): Hi, do you have any official information about pulau Bakumpai ? the only I could found from google is this one https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulau_Bakumpai.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 09:15:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90180967 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia (things randomly changed to motorways).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3862 .
marc__marc (2021-04-03 10:36:29+00:00): qu'est-ce que c'est le "bienvenue au carré plage ?"
widowild (2021-04-03 11:22:32+00:00): C’est une sorte de bungalow/container où il y a l’office du tourisme, je ne me rappelle plus, mais c’est un lieu où on a des informations sur la plage et sur la ville
eggie (2020-08-30 14:49:17+00:00): Top!
seewäldler (2020-08-31 08:24:54+00:00): Revertiert mit changeset 90177416. Die neue Straße ist als B31 ausgeschildert und heißt auch offiziell so. Auch wenn die alte auch noch als B31 ausgeschildert ist.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:50:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
Just be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90146002
user_2066394 (2020-08-30 14:13:58+00:00): Quelle dazu? Die Verlängerung der Straße trägt noch den alten Namen, müsste dann auch angepasst werden.
Kasia Kuhlmann (2020-08-30 17:51:35+00:00): Ich wohne in dieser Weg
opendcc (2020-08-30 14:08:57+00:00): Siehe hierzu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2309406
eggie (2020-08-30 14:43:07+00:00): Dag J Knaap.. Je hebt 2x dezelfde snoepwinkel toegevoegd in het midden van de weg. beter is het om op de adresnode 25 bij te taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-30 14:45:21+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
Kovoschiz (2020-08-30 15:11:19+00:00): 1. Please don't remove tags without reasons. 
2. Please don't delete features without replacing their objects. 
3. Sitting-out Area-s are considered `leisure=park` ---- `landuse=recreation_ground` can have a very specific yet debatable meaning.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-30 15:17:48+00:00): 2. `leisure=playground` doesn't mean the same thing as `=recreation_ground`. There's also a `playground=slide` indicated there.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:38:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90147956
eggie (2020-10-21 06:29:17+00:00): Dag Stijn.. Wat is je bron en ervaring in deze?
De kustlijn (met bijbehorende grenzen)  is specialistenwerk. Graag voorzichtigheid geboden.
Wat waren je kleine verbeteringen? 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-08-30 15:29:37+00:00): Dag MReenen

Je hoeft dat noet aan te geven. Dat is default. Fietsers routeren niet op voetpaden in Osm
Mvg
Eggie
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-09-01 19:25:43+00:00): hello thanks for your edit, however you are incorrect. Canal's are not only for boats as you can read on wiki, the usage can be applied to irrigation, which applies for levadas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dcanal

edit reverted.
skquinn (2020-08-30 16:32:47+00:00): Oops, source tag should have included MapWithAI also.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:48:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rather  fine and accurate. 
At 25 (out of 125) you missed accuracy and squaring.
Please keep in mind to be as precise as possible and square all rectangular buildings
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90148489
trigpoint (2020-08-30 16:11:12+00:00): Bore da
Croisi y OSM diolch/thank you for your edits. This one certainly needs to be reverted as you have turned the entire island of Great Britain into a beach.

Your edits seem to have been duplicating beaches which were already mapped. What were you trying to achieve?

Phil
trigpoint (2020-08-30 16:49:36+00:00): I have restored your additions, however I have mapped Carreg Chwislen as bare rock, its not a peak.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 09:30:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90149107
naveenpf (2020-09-22 09:30:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90149107
dmlu (2020-08-31 11:32:46+00:00): Hi,

is there a steet sign the stairs ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821635375)? I noticed that you added "Place de la Constitution" to them :)

If so, the correct tag would be name, not "addr:street".

Greetings
David
Gunstick (2020-08-31 21:22:50+00:00): I did not type that in. Maybe it's the Vespucci app I use which guesses names on it's own from surrounding. 
Anyway, this way will disappear as it's stairs and will be merged with the surrounding stairs.
Thanks for having a look at my stuff.
osmviborg (2020-08-30 16:40:17+00:00): Hej. 'maxstay' tiden angives, når det timer, som 'hour' eller 'hours'. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay
DK7080BE (2020-08-30 18:24:29+00:00): ok
Jeg valgte en af de forslag iD-editoren gav:
4 hr og satte et 2-tal foran. Jeg gik ud fra at editoren gav gyldige forslag.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:45:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are in general fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90150048
user_11740352 (2020-09-01 00:49:07+00:00): vandalismo rimosso.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90214736
stevea (2020-09-01 20:33:24+00:00): Nope:  this is a highway=residential, not tertiary, despite the designation as "State Route 35."  I've driven it many times, and while the 35 designation does correctly characterize it as a through route (to Hwy 17 and Santa Cruz County, for example), it is exceedingly sinuous, likely very greatly driven by those who live on it only (or scenic-interested tourists, or when other roads are closed as a detour) and has an effective speed limit of maybe 10 to 15 MPH.  (California's Basic Speed Law says a road may only be driven "as fast as is safe").  It serves only residences and the aforementioned (quite rare) through traffic.

Changing this from tertiary to residential.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:43:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Mappings are in general  fine and accurate. No errors
Please keep an eye on accurate mapping and follow all corners and extensions of a building
Do not collect multiple buildings and call it 1 building.

On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90150473
ljubo106 (2020-08-30 17:14:39+00:00): Also fixed.lication of the Kaffeesiederei Immervoll.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:38:47+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your mappings here.
See my remarks on changeset 90151209 which are also applicable here
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90150831
Komadinovic Vanja (2020-09-16 07:41:07+00:00): Hi,

I'm trying to understand this changeset regarding relation 11123588 and removal of node 7537814364 as guidepost and adding node 7859091835 as guidepost. Was that mistake?
Badojo (2020-09-16 07:48:27+00:00): Yes, i'm sorry. I forgot to move the relation on the node next to the road.
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:35:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

Your mapping work lacks accuracy and details on a number of mappings 
Task 240 is still open for mapping. Please take the time to correct your mappings
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90151209
VA00 (2021-03-27 07:51:54+00:00): Nie rozumiem co to za ścieżka. Nie można iść legalnie górą? https://youtu.be/oiTrlS0JjaM?t=5261
Adam_Piszczek (2021-03-27 10:24:36+00:00): Czego nie rozumiesz,jest przejście zamknięte dla pieszych i rowerów,od strony dworca na tym mostku w kierunku południowym,nie wiem jaki stan na dzisiaj tam ale jak jechałem krajową 52 rowerem tam skręciłem według nawigacji do tego mostku a tu zamknięte i ogrodzone,nie było przejścia w kierunku pomnika.
VA00 (2021-03-27 15:15:41+00:00): Chodziło mi o to:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842438408

Ale tu też jest dziwnie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342173621

Da się przejść pieszo, a z rowerem nie?
Adam_Piszczek (2021-03-27 21:35:15+00:00): Nie da się przejść jest to zamknięte i ogrodzone,wtedy było zamknięte a teraz nie wiem sprawdz sobie i nic nie jest dziwne tak było na dzień dzisiejszy nie wiem jak to teraz wygląda było zaspawane przejście.
Adam_Piszczek (2021-03-27 21:38:23+00:00): Tu nawet jest wzmianka o tym
https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/route?q=49.8530804,19.3878973;49.8654765,19.5678091&t=4#49.85200/19.47069/12
VA00 (2021-03-28 04:53:46+00:00): Nie kwestionuję stanu faktycznego, rozumiem  że widziałeś to na własne oczy :-) Ale dodając tylko bicycle=no nadal dopuszczasz przejście pieszo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.86367%2C19.56547%3B49.86535%2C19.56573#map=18/49.86450/19.56563 

Zmieniam na access=no i dodam płoty z obu stron, aby nawigacja nie głupiała.
Adam_Piszczek (2021-03-28 08:45:03+00:00): Ok, może nie zmieniłem ale byłem zdziwiony bo nawigacja też mnie tam doprowadziła😀
zstadler (2020-10-09 18:06:19+00:00): Hello 

In this edit you have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46705088
However, the gate at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088768719 remained unconnected.
Is it still there?

Best regards,
Zeev
alphensebezorger (2020-09-02 11:50:13+00:00): Hallo Peter,
Ik zag dat je dit wandelknooppunt hebt gemaakt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2291488270. Het lijkt me onwaarschijnlijk dat er echt een knooppuntpaal met nummer 0 hier staat. Op Mapillary vind ik wel een knooppunt bij de fietsenstalling, maar geen verwijzing naar 0.
Wat is je bron voor deze toevoeging? Of is dit een ‘virtueel’ knooppunt om foutmeldingen te voorkomen of zoiets?
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
P.S. Het punt zit in twee gelijknamige netwerken, is dat de bedoeling?
Peter Elderson (2020-09-02 13:19:15+00:00): Wat letten jullie goed op, Dick meldde ook al wat foutjes, zoals dat het hele netwerk verdubbeld was! Dat is inmiddels opgelost. Knooppunt 0 staat zo op de wandelknooppuntplanner. Kon je met Mapillary zien of er een echt nummer op staat?
Peter Elderson (2020-09-02 13:21:38+00:00): Ik denk dat er een nieuw knooppunt gepland is, wat ze alvast in de planner gezet hebben. Gebeurt wel vaker, heb ik gemerkt.
alphensebezorger (2020-09-02 18:38:07+00:00): Als bron kan dus wandelnet routeplanner vermeld worden.
Als ik deze foto bekijk (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/rTmbuOyOjovgKE-zlQF9sw lijkt het erop dat de route naar 41 vanaf hier noordelijker loopt, via een niet ingetekend pad. Komt niet langs de plek waar knooppunt 0 zou liggen. Daar zie ik alleen een plat paaltje met een pijltje. Ik vermoed dat daar gewoon de route van 34 naar 35 langskomt.
Het kan natuurlijk inmiddels veranderd zijn. Een survey lijkt me nodig om hier zinvol te kunnen mappen, voorlopig behelpen met fixme/note/description?
Peter Elderson (2020-09-03 07:52:37+00:00): Het noordelijke pad bestaat denk ik niet meer wegens werkzaamheden bij de snelweg. Daarom zal de splitsing verlegd zijn, maar het paaltje moet nog geplaatst worden, zoiets. Het aangegeven wandelpad bestaat wel, er loopt nog een wandelroute overheen. Fixme en note, goed idee. Inmiddels ben ik nog meer nulpunten tegengekomen, die zal ik dan ook een fixme en note geven.
Peter Elderson (2020-09-09 19:18:55+00:00): Ik ben zelf gaan kijken, gelijk maar een rondje om het hele verkeersknooppunt Lunetten gelopen. Er staat een nieuw knooppunt met nummer 31. Verder zijn er nog veel meer knooppunten tussengevoegd, maar dat is nog niet tot de Wandelplanner doorgedrongen. Daar staat dan tegenpver dat in het bos bij Austerlitz veel knooppunten op de planner staan die er in het veld helemaal niet zijn!
PT-53 (2020-08-31 09:27:44+00:00): Hallo Calmato1625,
in Baden-Württemberg steht uns die amtliche Karte Maps4BW zur Verfügung, von der wir legal abzeichnen dürfen. Damit können Gebäude lagegenau und mit dem EG-Grundriß nach OSM übernommen werden.
Maps4BW kann in den Editoren ID und JOSM als Hintergrund eingeblendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Schaus Dir mal an.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-31 09:29:17+00:00): PS.
Wie ich erst jetzt gesehen habe, hast Du Maps4BW ja schon eingeblendet. 
Warum weichen dann Deine Gebäude von Maps4BW ab?
Fragende Grüße
Calmato1625 (2020-08-31 20:18:59+00:00): Die Gebäude waren bereits so eingezeichnet. Allerdings haben sich die Flächen der Gebäude überschnitten. Dies habe ich korrigiert, aber die ursprüngliche (grobe) Digitalisierung der Geometrie beibehalten. Mir ist die Karte Maps4BW durchaus bekannt. Mir fehlten lediglich die Zeit und Laune dies dann noch mit Maps4BW im Detail zu verändern.
user_11422772 (2020-08-31 00:08:11+00:00): Hi, I would like to know why you deleted the local name Kabyle and you replaced it with the Arabic name are you allergic to the Kabyle language and thank you not to touch my changes please
user_11422772 (2020-08-31 01:37:43+00:00): Dear user, 
Please stop your hatred and racism towards the Kabyles
You have created several nicknames, the penultimate is. بشير إبراهيمي
You have had several quarrels with the cartographers in particular Numidian, who has done hard work on his region
Thank you for doing your work like the other Algerian mappers
It is brought to your knowledge that the state buildings in Algeria are transcribed in three languages namely Arabic, Tamazight and French
Cordially
user_11332999 (2020-08-31 03:09:34+00:00): dear user, i did not change or removed any name tag, i just filled up an empty "name" tag, added and aligned roads, as you can see in the changeset history.
user_11422772 (2020-08-31 22:16:28+00:00): Dear user,
I see that you do not know the region of Kabylia, your duplicates and your translation into Arabic
I would like to know your motivation to contribute on this region
what more will we bring to other mappers?

Greeting
MichaelCollinson (2025-01-17 01:32:45+00:00): Hi Alpha1904, I believe you added a comment 'I cannot find any source that names this "Wilderness Beck"' and I have now found the reference:  On OS sheet 168, publ. 1854, the beck is Wilderness Beck before it crosses Otley Road and then (upstream) Skibeden Beck. I am now editting the map to reflect that. The name probably comes from an area labelled "The Wilderness" just north of Short Bank Lane. [The Wilderness name may have fallen completely out of use so feel free to further edit - but please preserve it as an alt_name.]

Thanks for not just deleting the tagging, I personally feel that OSM is important for preserving names that folks are beginning to forget. Regards and Happy Mapping, Mike

Michael Collinson
habi (2020-09-07 10:17:55+00:00): You should not add 'name=building' to buildings. Tagging them as 'building=yes' is sufficient.
sparsile (2020-09-07 16:42:00+00:00): yeah must have missed deleting one. you might want to consider telling the bloomberg person and whoever was training that crowd if you'd like your feedback to be effective. cheers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90152221
habi (2020-09-11 12:26:41+00:00): So it was not *you* who added that name?
GerdP (2020-12-09 09:57:40+00:00): Moin!
Dein Kommentar endet mitten im Satz.
Ich denke, der Radweg bekommt gar keinen Namen. Ich habe ihn gelöscht, siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95543383