piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dzamper (2021-08-17 18:00:21+00:00): Nieee, public_transport=stop_position zostaje na drodze, highway=bus_stop powinien być razem z public_transport =platform obok drogi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
Badojo (2021-08-05 18:45:15+00:00): Reverted, lake doesn't exist
Badojo (2021-08-05 18:47:11+00:00): Reverted, incorrect road type
Badojo (2021-08-05 18:49:18+00:00): Please don't arbitrarily change road types. The map is for mapping existing features.
Clarke22 (2021-08-05 20:16:04+00:00): ... multiple sources, including University traffic regulations, transportation plan, and width and presence of bike riders.
dieterdreist (2023-03-15 08:33:44+00:00): Buongiorno Dino,

guardando Monte Santa Caterina mi chiedo da dove viene l'altezza, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5976615274/history
confrontando con le curve di livello (e anche stando alla riva opposta del lago) non sembra sia così alto. Ti riccordi dove l'hai presa ("Toponimi Martignano" non dice niente)? Potrebbe essere un errore di battitura?
Saluti,
Martin
Dino Michelini (2023-03-15 13:46:20+00:00): Si hai ragione è un errore tra 0 e 9. Il dato dell’elevazione è un rilievo di quanto facevo le pattuglie topografiche come allievo ufficiale a Cesano. Grazie
dieterdreist (2023-03-15 13:52:44+00:00): Grazie della risposta, ho corretto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133711183
(spero di aver capito bene).

saluti,
Martin
Dino Michelini (2023-03-15 14:01:23+00:00): Perfetto. Grazie
BCNorwich (2021-08-06 06:22:43+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap

The premises should be tagged as disused by Debenhams. If a building is there please amend the tags to present use rather than delete the building. I've reinstated the building.

Ragards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
abakus_uploader (2021-08-05 22:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Samaipata (2021-09-06 07:21:31+00:00): Hi. What is the source for the tag you added, "ref=38”, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255109153 and many other highways in South Sudan? What do these numbers represent? Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
eggie (2021-08-05 19:39:53+00:00): Dag barnasc  
Kleine aanpassing verricht. Je info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode en amenity=doctors toegevoegd
felipeeugenio (2021-08-05 19:32:53+00:00): Estimado. Con la letra Q puede cuadrar las estructuras.
Acabo de hacer eso para varias de sus estructuras.
Otra cosa. Por favor dibujar el perfil de la base de la casa/edificio. No un polígono esquemático.
gracias
felipeeugenio (2021-08-05 19:37:38+00:00): Estimado. Está repartiendo cuadrados por todas partes. le pedimos por favor atenerse a lo que se ve en las fotos satelitales e intentar dibujarlos de la manera mas fiel posible. Es eso para jugar en alguna App?
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-05 21:23:33+00:00): Did this recently get lane markings?  If not, then lane_markings=no is better than lanes=2 in this case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109219049
aceman444 (2024-03-24 14:09:41+00:00): Zdravim, tie parkoviska pre nakladanie pri IKEI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970722475) asi nie su uplne loading_dock podla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dloading_dock . Skusite to nejako prepracovat?
SekeRob (2021-08-05 19:40:21+00:00): Part 2 CS comment, woodland, farmland, scrub and pond. A double weir/dam spillway, west to east flow line tagged artificial as not knowing where the presumed tunnel is going.
Graf Westerholt (2021-11-17 10:08:22+00:00): Warum hast du bei Kriegsfuss Öffnungszeiten eingetragen, die so weder auf der Webseite noch an der Tür stehen? Waren außerdem syntaktisch falsch.
portalaventura (2021-09-05 03:57:54+00:00): A alteração geométrica quebrou três relações:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6164091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/303913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/303877
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/970723928

Fiz as correções.

Tome mais cuidado ao alterar as geometrias.

Verifique sempre se as geometrias pertencem à relações antes de alterá-las.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109219442
(Inactive) hayduke1275 (2021-09-07 14:41:45+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to our attention and updating the data.
Jamison_Gomes2 (2026-01-15 18:38:09+00:00): O condomínio é aberto para entrega com veículos.
Tem Portaria mas a entrada e controlada.
SekeRob (2021-08-05 19:51:27+00:00): Lol, I mapped it myself 3 months ago... these lines a practically invisible on standard carto rendering.
mueschel (2021-08-22 12:30:02+00:00): Hi,
please check this MP. There is now a huge area, including many cities covered with trees.

http://osm.org/relation/13059951
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-08-20 07:00:10+00:00): as alterações implicaram graves danos alterando sentidos de transito erradamente! a sua edição parece ser importante mas tenha muita atenção no futuro! corrigido
ddtuga (2021-08-21 11:54:03+00:00): Peço imensa desculpa não tinha reparado no sentido errado do trânsito. Irei corrigir imediatamente
PaoloLombardi (2021-08-14 20:07:35+00:00): Ciao. Ho visto che hai modificato parecchie cose ma i conti ora non tornano. 
Le piste di "downhill" sono solo per bici e non per pedoni o cani. Un saluto.
Kalepom (2021-08-18 17:55:24+00:00): J'aime bien voir des panneaux de pub disparaître. Merci pour ta contribution ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-05 21:31:05+00:00): Keep your changeset area small. If you have unsaved edits, make sure to cancel those when going elsewhere.
Lee Carré (2021-08-06 01:10:18+00:00): While the comment is a http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments it's misleading since the bounding box extends far beyond India.

In general, try to group related changes into changesets. Related how?
▪︎location (same geographical area, e.g. retailers along the same road)
▪︎type (e.g. landuse, buildings, road surface, benches & bins in the same park)

Smaller changesets are much easier to review, verify, and comment on.
Large changesets (of assorted changes) have the problem for would-be commenters of first having to identify which change is being referred to.

Large changeset bounding boxes show up in the list for more people checking their local area, unlike those which cover a small area.
This changeset will have appeared for half of Europe, half of Africa, the Middle East, and everywhere in between.
Multiple changesets, for disparate changes, would avoid this problem.

As a newbie, I would recommend StreetComplete. Start by helping to survey your local area, before doing armchair mapping of places afar.

Other than that; thanks for the contributions.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
BCNorwich (2021-08-07 09:09:33+00:00): Hi, You've placed Way: Corbenic Poetry Path (614777421) on top of the existing Way: 970733275 thus making duplication of highways. I had previously moved the footpath into the woods as I thought that it's position. If the route does go up the service road from the car park then that existing highway ought to be amended. It's not correct mapping to place a highway atop of another. 

If you need help with the amendment please just ask. Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-08-07 09:14:28+00:00): On looking at the whole of the Corbenic Poetry Path route it would be good to add a route relation for it. Especially as the name is unlikely to be the formal name given to all those sections of path. Rather the name Corbenic Poetry Path would be the formal name given to the route. Again if you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
JamJar II (2021-08-07 10:00:20+00:00): Yes, the route does follow the highway out of the estate for that section. The highway is one way for vehicular traffic.
marc__marc (2022-07-02 23:43:54+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13041100
you made a confusion between history (a old key to describe a reverted) and historic.
Regards,
Marc
mueschel (2021-08-12 10:17:53+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8984214682
Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez (2021-08-13 02:12:31+00:00): Thank you for this!, I have just made the correction about the neighborhood´s name.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-03 23:03:48+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset some unlikely tags have become attached to the "Cumbria Coastal Way" long distance path, such as "designation=public_footpath" - you can see the at http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1603791 .
Do you know which way there were intended to be added to?
I can help fix it if you like.
Best Regards,
Andy
Artasen (2021-10-05 12:34:16+00:00): Hi there, thanks for pointing this out. Feel free to fix any tags you think are inappropriate. I am not aware of any unlikely tags for PROW’s and I usuallu check with the MapThePaths and the Cumbria C.C. PROW map https://cumbria.gov.uk/roads-transport/public-transport-road-safety/countryside-access/Rights_of_way/Map.asp  As far as the CCW I use the out of print book “Cumbria Coastal Way” by I & K Brodie pub by Cicerone Press, although I’m aware that this doesn’t always align with PROW’s presumably these are where Cumbria C.C. negotiated permissive paths. I think its poor  of Cumbria C.C. to abandon support for this long distance path which I thought superior to the Cumbria Way, especially as most of the path was on PROW’s or on or near the HWM which is also public. However I suppose its going to be replaced by the England Coast Path eventually so probably doesn’t matter in the long term.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
DUGA (2024-03-15 02:21:17+00:00): No exit is only supposed to use at the final node of a segment. Routing does not need this tag to figure out if it is a dead end or not.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10733206/history#map=19/41.97973/-75.74534
bxl-forever (2021-08-20 23:17:17+00:00): Hello,

The huge list of name is addr:unit on housenumber 9 looks a little weird.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8984244527

As you can see, addr:unit is directly rendered on the main map layer.

If this is name of residents of this building, then this information must be deleted from OSM immediately.

I suppose this is a mistake but I’d rather ask you first.
bxl-forever (2021-08-20 23:19:15+00:00): But I bet this is a copy-and-paste error, as this looks like the reference of a book.
pistepilvi (2021-08-21 00:05:56+00:00): Sorry about that, you are entirely correct.
TomCerts (2021-08-05 21:46:00+00:00): Edit: Classification made as well in Κιοτάρι
ottwiz (2021-08-28 07:35:52+00:00): Southern Fayette County WV, that would've been the changeset comment
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
mueschel (2021-08-12 10:17:11+00:00): Hi,
what does 'comm = SITP' mean? This tag is not used in other places.
JuanMelo (2021-08-13 23:42:51+00:00): Fixed
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-08-08 18:27:02+00:00): boa tarde, esta edição será revertida, o restaurante em questão já se encontra no mapa.

Cumprimentos
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-06 09:14:12+00:00): Hi jballands, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 15:33:54+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111030037
eggie (2021-08-15 07:06:57+00:00): Beste Wetterhorn. Het is geen oneway=yes hier
Ik heb je wijziging teruggedraaid naar oneway=no.
Wat is je bron in deze?


MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-07 14:20:08+00:00): Olá, tente melhorar a descrição de suas modificações
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
stedewa (2021-08-05 22:13:59+00:00): source : 
https://www.vd.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/themes/environnement/eau/fichiers_pdf/DIREV_PRE/De_Source_S%C3%BBre__Rivi%C3%A8res__2017.pdf
Violaine_Do (2021-08-09 21:05:51+00:00): Iaorana e Maeva dans OSM à Tahiti, oscarascal, attention dans OSM les tags sont définis par la communauté. Pour le coup, les centres de plongée se qualifient avec amenity=dive_centre alors que les magasins avec shop=scuba_diving. Si le lieu fait les 2, il faut garder les 2. Je te laisse regarder (j'ai juste corriger le côté centre de plongée, tu avais mis amenity=scuba_diving), tu as l'air de connaître l'endroit. Le wiki est la bible du contributeur : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddive_centre
J'en profite aussi pour te faire suivre les bonnes pratiques : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques Bonne continuation!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109224339
oscarascal (2021-08-12 00:48:17+00:00): Iaorana, merci pour le retour ! J'ai fait le changement avec OSMAnd sur l'interface "humaine" et ça avait l'air de poser problème en effet. Je vais retourner sur place et bien vérifier s'ils font magasin aussi.
alphensebezorger (2021-08-08 11:57:00+00:00): Hallo Hendrikklaas,

Op zoek naar een geschikte waarde voor traffic_calming bij taginfo, liep ik tegen deze blijkbaar verdwaalde tags van jouw hand aan: 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1a7j
Misschien nog eens naar kijken?
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
Hendrikklaas (2021-11-06 22:49:35+00:00): Aangepast, bedankt
Morten Lange (2021-10-04 20:48:08+00:00): Siden du tydeligvis ikke har vært der og observert endringene, så burde du spurt før du foregrep begivenhetenes gang.  Vennligst rett opp. Byggingen av Fornebubanen var ikke påbegynt der i august da endringen ble gjort. Ligger antakelig noen år fram i tid.
Noen (2021-10-04 21:26:04+00:00): Hei! Du har helt rett i at tunneldriving ikke har startet mellom Lysaker og Skøyen. Men riggområde er etablert ved Skøyen og etableres ved Lysaker "3. kvartal 2021".
Til en viss grad må begivenhetene foregripes. Vi oppdaterer ikke tunneldriften underveis.
Så kan vi selvsagt diskutere om det er misvisende og tagge denne delen av Fornebubanen med "construction" eller ikke.
Morten Lange (2021-10-04 21:46:29+00:00): Ok, var litt rask der, med å anta hvor langt fram i tid dette er. Men i august  stemte dette dårlig med terrenget.  Og sik er det enda io begynnelsen av oktober. Men mulig det nå kun er snakk om 2-4 uker før Monolitveien blir lagt om.
vorpalblade (2021-08-05 23:26:53+00:00): Comment should be "Add minspeeds"

See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21203
G_P_J (2021-08-06 10:59:11+00:00): I po problemie :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
abakus_uploader (2021-08-06 22:37:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kevinp2 (2022-04-05 16:00:23+00:00): This changeset seems to have deleted informal footpaths that exist and are actually in use daily.
kevinp2 (2022-04-12 23:29:51+00:00): This changeset deleted many features  that I had added that actually exist on the ground.  
Examples: 

Informal paths from the South Jetty, used daily.
US government survey markers on the jetty.

And these are only the ones that I am aware of, or remember.

Please attempt to restore the deleted features if possible.  And please avoid deleting anything using just imagery.  A "cleanup" should not result in deleting genuine information added by other users.  Thank you.
kevinp2 (2022-04-12 23:30:54+00:00): Here is one example of a way that was deleted.  Way: 926301238
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
bxl-forever (2021-08-07 01:55:00+00:00): Hello,
Sorry but I had to revert this.
I visit this area regularly and the service road you created does not exist.  It is a large construction site for the moment, with a few temporary tracks for construction trucks only.
snoozingnewt (2021-08-07 14:34:51+00:00): Ok, that's fine.
JassKurn (2021-08-06 11:13:48+00:00): In this edit I've blundered by allowing taxi both ways along western section of sidwell st (using psv tag). I fix later today (6th June)
DressyPear4 (2021-08-06 18:44:08+00:00): Revertido áreas que não são praça!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109228536
DressyPear4 (2021-08-06 18:45:45+00:00): Revertido vandalismo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109228543
tekim (2021-08-06 14:52:45+00:00): Hello again!,
Generally if a road has houses along it, it probably should be highway=residential, or a higher classification. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970770248
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109228741
Viki_travel_weak (2021-08-09 14:54:03+00:00): Hi, tekim! 
I answered your question in this chanпset https://osmcha.org/changesets/108638121, sorry to wait
Viki_travel_weak (2021-08-09 14:54:51+00:00): Thanks for supporting!
Mundilfari (2021-08-06 03:20:44+00:00): Hi - I saw you closed a gap in the sidewalk on Shumard Ln (between nodes 8911835667 and 8911835666) is there a publicly available image source that's based on? Asking because all the imagery I could find shows either brownfield or construction, but nothing that actually has that stretch of sidewalk (yet).
If you found better/more up to date imagery somewhere, I'd be thrilled if you could share where to find it...I've been mapping tons of houses and sidewalks in this general area and left quite a couple of gaps where stuff wasn't there yet at the time the bing/mapbox/esri aerials were taken.

Thanks!
jcarlson (2021-08-06 21:48:17+00:00): Hey there!

I don't know if it's publicly available. We use a proprietary imagery provider in Kendall County (I work there), and while I have permission to map things using the imagery, I do not believe I can share the imagery itself.

If you'd like, I can make a quick sweep of this area and close up any other sidewalk gaps I see. The imagery was just flown last month, so it's quite current.
Mundilfari (2021-08-06 23:14:24+00:00): Hi - thanks for getting back on this - that makes sense.
Yeah, if you don't mind closing the gaps in Ashwood park based on the imagery you have, that would be fantastic. There's a bunch of gaps a little north of the one you closed already; some on Carpenter Rd and Laceback Lane; and two or three just south of 111th (Little Leaf Rd / Christa Dr).
Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated!
jcarlson (2021-08-07 02:51:52+00:00): I closed up what I could. Some other gaps got narrower, but are still there.
I really wish developers wouldn't do it this way, but I suppose it makes sense with the heavy equipment going in and out of a build site. Still, there are areas over in Kendall County where there have been 1 or 2 lot gaps in the sidewalk for over 10 years.
Mundilfari (2021-08-11 01:01:07+00:00): This is great, thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-08-06 03:01:50+00:00): While the street names of these locations are purely extrapolation: northbound from Kampung Puteh junction and a bit southbound from Batu 4 junction.

The limits of non-local, remote mapping effort is obvious.
Warin61 (2021-08-13 01:26:34+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The  tag area=yes is not required on most things.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-06 14:26:28+00:00): `highway=rest_area` may be used with `motor_vehicle=no` + `bicycle=`
Kovoschiz (2021-08-08 11:05:16+00:00): Please also message at https://discord.gg/P8fxC98