piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-08-29 20:10:07+00:00): Het gebouw op het vlak heb ik verwijderd. name= Holtenstraat 11-21 heb ik verwijderd. 
De childcare zit tegenwoordig ergens anders.
In het begin is correct mappen lastig al lijkt het allemaal zo simpel 
MVG
eggie
adrianojbr (2022-08-30 02:36:35+00:00): Olá, PumpkinPieAficionado!

Houve um problema nesse changeset, que acabou adicionando nome nessa via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342310333/.
PumpkinPieAficionado (2022-08-30 22:13:25+00:00): The name tag has been removed. Thank you!
A etiqueta de nome foi removida. Obrigado!
flohoff (2022-08-30 15:50:34+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier ein maxspeed=40 eingetragen. Ist das neu? In den mapillary bildern (Relativ alt) kann ich das nicht entdecken.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24231722

Das hat zu deutlichen routingänderungen geführt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=382422,430358#51.6803,8.9818,15z

und die neuen routen sind signifikant langsamer.

Flo
bielebog (2022-08-30 21:28:48+00:00): Da stehen tatsächlich Tempo 40-Schilder. Hab die mal explizit nachgetragen: http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%2F*%0AThis%20has%20been%20generated%20by%20the%20overpass-turbo%20wizard.%0AThe%20original%20search%20was%3A%0A%E2%80%9C%22traffic%20sign%22%E2%80%9D%0A*%2F%0A%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F%20gather%20results%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%3A%20%E2%80%9C%22traffic%20sign%22%E2%80%9D%0A%20%20node%5B%22traffic_sign%22%5D(51.67490711369865%2C8.982009887695312%2C51.67768141080472%2C8.988715410232544)%3B%0A)%3B%0A%2F%2F%20print%20results%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-29 20:26:27+00:00): Cześć! Zerknij tutaj jak tagować budowy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:construction
◪ Jarv (2022-08-31 20:42:08+00:00): Hi SB329.

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112249410#map=16/50.8034/0.0792&layers=T

You changed the highway tag from track to bridleway. Whilst this track is a bridleway, it is also used for farm vehicles so should be tagged as a track. The other tags such as "designation=public_bridleway" show that this is a public bridleway.

Its an easy mistake to make, but just keep in mind that a Public right of way status doesn't mean the way should be tagged with that (i.e. some residential roads are "public footways", but would still be tagged as "highway=residential", as you should always use the highest highway classification)

Further guidance on this can be found at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom

Kind regards,
Thomas
ivanbranco (2022-08-31 15:31:26+00:00): Hi orrthocircular,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lvL

the correct value is "neighbourhood", could you take a look at them?
orthocircular (2022-08-31 19:41:05+00:00): Apologies, you'd think the iD preset would've caught that.
ZLima12 (2022-09-05 19:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted, as the roads do not meet the local requirements for highway=motorway. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125827791
ZLima12 (2022-09-05 19:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted, as the roads do not meet the local requirements for highway=motorway. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125827791
kepivar (2022-09-07 23:47:36+00:00): Cool work, where is the import page in the Wiki?
Tomas Marklund (2022-09-08 05:13:39+00:00): There is no page for the projekt itself, but here is a page explaining the origin how the imported data is translated to osm tags.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sweden/trafikverket/datadescription/J%C3%A4rnv%C3%A4g
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
kakiremora (2022-08-29 20:40:41+00:00): ^^ na pewno nie widać w terenie
Tyndare (2022-08-30 09:57:22+00:00): Merci  pour avoir de nouveau corrigé la position de l'arrêt, désolé de l'avoir redéplacé, j'aurais pas du sans regarder l'historique.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 20:59:58+00:00): Iaorana et merci de ta contribution mais avant d'ajuster la donnée, il faut recaler l'imagerie aux données de la carte. Ici les données font foi car elles viennent du Pays (qualité topo), merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125540868
ZLima12 (2022-09-05 19:11:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125827988 . Again, local consensus has a higher standard for what can be considered as highway=motorway. This road's limited-access characteristics are conveyed in the expressway=yes tag that is already on it.
Piskvor (2022-09-07 08:11:02+00:00): Tohle určitě není Z-box, jen výdejní místo.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-09-07 08:37:26+00:00): To já vím, už jsem o tom psal do mailing listu, to bylo označené jako pošta a já jsem si to uvědomil až potom.
NieWnen (2022-08-30 09:49:59+00:00): Usunąłeś jeden gigantyczny landuse i spory obszar pozostał bez niczego i spora część jest "pusta".
Przywróciłem go (w100318926) (changeset: 125559979).

Landuse najlepiej dzielić (w szczególności te giganty) po kawałku np. wydzielać kwartał z alt+x (utilsplugin) równając do płotów.
Frans S (2022-08-30 10:29:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
Supaplex030 (2022-09-02 16:16:51+00:00): Hallo kartograph, kleine Info: Ich habe den von dir hier gelöschten Straßenbrunnen wieder hergestellt, aber mit "removed:"-Prefixes als "entfernt" gekennzeichnet. So bleibt der Standort als "ehemaliger Standort" eines Straßenbrunnens in der Datenbank erhalten. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Berliner_Stra%C3%9Fenbrunnen.

lg, Alex
kartograph (2022-09-02 19:54:49+00:00): Hi Alex,

vielen Dank :). Ich wusste nicht, dass es hierfür Archivierungsregeln gibt.
olo81 (2023-12-05 01:01:20+00:00): Ten przystanek nie jest na osobnej drodze, nie dodajemy w takim wypadku drugiej jezdni. 
Do poprawy.
olo81 (2023-12-05 01:04:12+00:00): zmieniłem
olo81 (2023-12-05 01:05:05+00:00): ale widzę że jest tego więcej w Olkuszu
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-22 10:51:24+00:00): الحرم المكي مرسوم سابقاً نرجوا منكم عدم تكرار إدخال المكان
NieWnen (2022-08-30 11:27:15+00:00): Do tagu highway=construction
należy jeszcze dodać construction=wartość (takie highway, co jest w budowie)

tutaj o tym więcej: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Oprócz tego przesunął Ci się węzeł i skrzywił fragment drogi (te drugie poprawiłem).
eggie (2022-08-30 06:07:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rj667 (2022-08-30 22:43:29+00:00): Dank je!
justb (2023-04-13 10:23:27+00:00): Hoi rj667, goed om te zien. Zar naar 'changes' op Camping Lorkenbos te kijken. Ik doe ook vaak wat aanpassingen. Info komt niet meer uit de BAG dus moeten we zelf onderhouden. Denk dat we elkaar kennen. Groet, Just
Warin61 (2022-08-31 00:35:01+00:00): this relation needs to go. It should be replaced by building:part. Ideally the correction should be done by the original mapper. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124703933
Warin61 (2022-08-31 00:38:21+00:00): Replacing apartment with roof is not correct! Where did the apartments go? They are still there... 

Reverted in full.
mcliquid (2022-08-31 06:49:46+00:00): Hallo demjo,

du hast hier nur einen Punkt ergänzt, der außer einem Namen keine weiteren Merkmale hat. Dieser wird dann leider nicht mal auf der Karte dargestellt.

Es fehlt eine Information wie beispielsweise, dass es sich hier um einen Imker handelt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper

Oder ist es eine vor Ort beschilderte Route? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:route
afnxn (2022-08-30 09:01:28+00:00): stupid and sussy? o_O Open wiki, here's no motorway signs 'on ground'.
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 10:02:44+00:00): defo has motorway characteristics
afnxn (2022-08-30 10:11:21+00:00): No, because it has no signs 'motorway'. You should know that there are three types of separated highways in Russia: IА,  IБ and IВ. Motorways are only IА category, but                   IБ (that is Khabarovsk Bypass highway) are not motorways. Correct categories you can find in tag "highway:category".
user_9434724 (2022-08-30 12:51:59+00:00): afnn if you would like to revert this you may do so with http://revert.osmz.ru/
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 14:34:31+00:00): There is another motorway near Kemerovo (P384) which has simular characteristics to this road and also has no signs, if you wanna downgrade this to trunk, then also downgrade the A370 through the city to primary to secondary
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 14:41:48+00:00): Btw this is a news source https://www.akm.ru/eng/news/traffic-on-the-khabarovsk-bypass-motorway-created-with-the-support-of-gazprombank-has-opened/
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 14:41:54+00:00): and its from russia
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 14:42:00+00:00): end of debate
afnxn (2022-08-30 18:45:01+00:00): Oh. You're mistaken. Motorway Kemerovo - Leninsk-Kuznetsky (P-384 is incorrect number) is a real motorway, it was constructed as a IA category, and - the main thing -it has motorway green-color signs. 
What about your link to AK&M, well, they used a 'motorway' term, but it is incorrect, because the road was constructed as IБ category and doesn't have motorway signs. You may look.for local media e.g. https://www.hab.kp.ru/online/news/4833584/ to approve it. Blue traffic signs and maxspeed 90 kmph.
user_15552334 (2022-08-30 22:55:41+00:00): blablablah, OSM uses uk route classifications, follow them smh, and this route has UK motorway charactistics
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 23:32:13+00:00): > blablablah, OSM uses uk route classifications,

Actually, no it doesn't.  Various communities around the world have decided how best to map their road classifications into OSM ones, and it doesn't always match what is normal in the UK, because road classifications differ internationally.  A German trunk road in OSM has certain characteristics that won't necessarily apply to a UK one, for example, and the same is true of a US motorway.
If the community in Russia says "the classification of this road is X" and you think it's Y, then they're right and you're wrong.
afnxn (2022-08-31 00:45:02+00:00): Please read carefully https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification .
user_15552334 (2022-08-31 11:28:30+00:00): Welp, tbh OSM users should probably use a worldwide classification to avoid confusion like this.
e.g HArd shoulder = motorway maybe
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-29 23:11:57+00:00): Accidental deletion
kersentaart (2022-10-12 11:06:28+00:00): Is er een reden waarom dit een nieuwe relatie is, in plaats van role=approach te gebruiken en het deel te maken van de National Park Trail relatie (zoals ik oorspronkelijk had gedaan?). Meer uitleg hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roles_for_recreational_route_relations .
Thierry1030 (2022-10-12 16:15:57+00:00): Dag 'kersentaart',
Deze tag "role=approach" ken ik niet. Ik zal hiervoor even navraag doen in de chatgroep van OSM BE.
Over de relatie "Aanlooproute Station Genk - National Park Trail' kan ik de volgende context meegeven:
die relatie heeft gebruiker "https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RLKM_Nationaal%20Park%20Hoge%20Kempen" op mijn aanraden aangemaakt. Deze gebruiker is een werknemer van de de organisatie die het Nationaal Park beheert. Hij wist te vertellen dat 'National Park Trail' een route op zich is, en daarnaast is er de aanlooproute.
In ieder geval kom ik bij u terug als ik wijzer ben geworden over 'role=approach' ...
Thierry1030 (2022-10-12 17:30:30+00:00): ter info: discussie is te volgen op https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe-channels:matrix.org
s8evq (2022-10-12 18:01:39+00:00): Dag Kersentaart en Thierry1030. In principe kan de aanlooproute ook in z'n eigen relatie. Zolang main en approach dan maar samen in een parent of superrelatie zitten en daar hun role gedefinieerd krijgen. Dat is ook zo beschreven op de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roles_for_recreational_route_relations#Apply_to_child_relations_in_a_route_hierarchy
Ik vind het een mooiere oplossing zo. Hier in dit specifieke geval moet die parent relation dus wel nog aangemaakt worden.
Peter Elderson (2022-10-13 10:39:55+00:00): Rol is zo gedefinieerd om het renderers mogelijk te maken om aanlooproutes bijvoorbeeld gestippeld af te beelden. Tegelijk zouden elementen met een rol uitgefilterd moeten worden bij het bepalen van een hoogteprofiel en het aanmaken van een gpx of kml. Het is de keus van de mapper om de aanlooproute als ways in de routerelatie zelf te zetten, of als aparte relatie binnen een overkoepelende superrelatie. 
Op dit moment is er nog geen app of site die approach-elementen uitfiltert bij het maken van een gpx, dus mijn voorkeur is om de hoofdroute en de aanlooproute als aparte relaties aan te maken. Via de tags kan je zorgen dat de beide elementen hetzelfde symbol en ref krijgen. Waymarkedtrails biedt een superrelatie én de samenstellende delen allemaal afzonderlijk aan, dus daar kun je ook bv de aanlooproute als lwn zetten bij een nwn route, samen in één superrelatie. Een request om gedetailleerd dingen met de rollen te doen ligt al een tijd bij waymarkedtrails, maar het heeft daar geen prioriteit.
pertile (2022-10-25 14:02:30+00:00): Modifiqué esta edición porque el pavimento va solo hasta Los Mistoles, no sigue más allá.
nevw (2022-09-05 07:03:43+00:00): Hi, a problem here to fix
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.96179&lat=-27.51389&zoom=16
GOwin (2022-08-30 06:23:25+00:00): Thanks for adding. Have you seen the wiki page for surfing? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dsurfing

You might want to add details for wave type, (eg wave=right, or wave=guide, etc) instead of adding it to the description?
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-30 00:39:03+00:00): esta es la parte 1 de muchas ediciones de reserva de datos que hemos ingresado, ya que algunos de los cambios en el paisaje, estos datos se ingresaron originalmente por accidente debido a que el editor proporcionó mapas bing por defecto sin una indicación

Para obtener más información sobre este problema, póngase en contacto con nosotros o (Jesus Lopez of the OpenStreetMap Foundation )

Gracias
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-30 00:39:33+00:00): For more information about this issue, please contact us or (Jesus Lopez of the OpenStreetMap Foundation) Thank you
hanchao (2022-08-30 01:39:07+00:00): Please use the maxar satellite map

请使用Maxar卫星图

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxar
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-30 01:53:27+00:00): we will make a note use maxar Satelite for this area thank you for the recommendation
user_5359 (2022-08-31 13:02:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/973878585/history. What is the meaning of this tag?
Arctic gnome (2022-08-31 16:21:54+00:00): I tried to undelete relation 6498593 using JOSM, but it didn't work, so I made relation 14520100 with the same information.
Frans S (2022-09-13 09:56:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125545922
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-30 02:00:17+00:00): esta es la parte 2 de muchas ediciones de reserva de datos que hemos ingresado, ya que algunos de los cambios en el paisaje, estos datos se ingresaron originalmente por accidente debido a que el editor proporcionó mapas bing por defecto sin una indicación

Para obtener más información sobre este problema, póngase en contacto con nosotros o (Jesus Lopez of the OpenStreetMap Foundation )

Gracias
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-30 02:00:37+00:00): For more information about this issue, please contact us or (Jesus Lopez of the OpenStreetMap Foundation) Thank you
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-16 02:27:40+00:00): DWG revert due to vandalism:
changeset/131319516
Fnkok (2022-09-02 16:20:09+00:00): 请不要再破坏，谢谢。
osm不是沙盒。
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-30 18:51:25+00:00): Please leave changeset comments so other mappers can see what you've changed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-17 10:45:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126293162 where the changeset comment is: Revert spam - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6371
Warin61 (2022-09-02 03:10:22+00:00): Hi,

Way: Larapinta Trail Section 6 (1090363151) is now not part of the Larapinta Trail relation - instead that now has Way: 1044425939 - a vehicle track... Is that intended? As a walker I'd prefer the narrow path compared to the vehicle track :)
wildwalks (2022-09-02 08:51:24+00:00): Hi Warin.
Thanks -- I added way 1090363151 (and a few others and shelters etc) in the area as it was not on the map at all. I did not think of updating the relations for the trail -- oops.
Yes I agree that it should go via the single track (that is what is signposted, intended and a much nicer route).
Agree it needs adding to the relation. You want to update the relation or shall I??
thanks :)
Warin61 (2022-09-02 09:51:33+00:00): All yours.

I may have added the vehicle track some time back when the northern route opened .. it was all that was available at the time.
Warin61 (2022-09-02 09:52:31+00:00): Oh 
The Maxar imagery is showing the shelters, so at long last these can be seen.
wildwalks (2022-09-02 09:57:42+00:00): cool -- I am travelling but will do it when I can. Yes I walked with GPS and traced it out -- Was glad it was single track and not a road slog :)
wildwalks (2022-09-02 10:00:40+00:00): I added the loop around Ellery to streetview as well.
It is still propagating -- takes about a week.
But a few segments are popping up
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-23.7722001,133.0732844,3a,75y,192.97h,89.46t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAF1QipOtYd_A-EM9YYWLP_vGYU5t6UBilcCmOxS9xXHi!2e10!3e11!7i7680!8i3840
bielebog (2022-12-12 22:22:23+00:00): Hi, ich war so frei, den Waschsalon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9370065542 an der Neuhäuser Straße mal wieder rück-umzuziehen.
thetornado76 (2022-12-13 07:08:46+00:00): Hi,
Hatte ich letztens auch gesehen, dass der Waschsalon umgezogen ist. Stand noch auf meiner ToDo Liste es zu korrigieren.
Danke!
ZLima12 (2022-09-06 00:35:38+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125834666 . Please map in accordance with the NYS Classification Guidelines, which would make Lake Ontario State Parkway highway=primary with expressway=yes.
ZLima12 (2022-09-06 00:35:46+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125834666 . Please map in accordance with the NYS Classification Guidelines, which would make Lake Ontario State Parkway highway=primary with expressway=yes.
ZLima12 (2022-09-06 00:35:50+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125834666 . Please map in accordance with the NYS Classification Guidelines, which would make Lake Ontario State Parkway highway=primary with expressway=yes.
ptarac (2022-08-30 18:16:56+00:00): Hello!
I wonder how did you set 'tracktype' to 'grade5'? Please describe me your methodology. Thank you.
Lapjun (2022-08-30 20:01:07+00:00): @[ptarac] Hi, this is how I did it through iD Editor.  I clicked on the road and when clicking on the section "Track Type" under "Fields", a list pops up of road composition.  Then I selected "Soft: soil/sand/grass" which is just the long form of "grade5"

Since I have never used JOSM before, if you are using it, the process may be different and you most likely have to manually enter the tag you mentioned, "tracktype = grade5".  Hope this helps!
ptarac (2022-08-30 21:02:14+00:00): Thank you for your response. 
At JOSM, we use templates that allow you to choose the appropriate tagging. In both editors, there is no obligation to add a surface hardening type.

Adding a tracktype based only on satellite imagery is inappropriate. On this basis, it is not possible to add this tag because:
- we have no knowledge of the field,
- the need for such tagging was not indicated in the manual (only unpaved / paved is mentioned as a value for surface,
- the condition of the pavement of unpaved roads may change dramatically (e.g. after heavy rainfall or after prolonged droughts).

I think you should remove "tracktype = grade5".
Lapjun (2022-08-30 23:17:47+00:00): Only for this specific task for some reason, numerous roads were pre-imported with the "tracktype = grade5" before I started mapping.  

I will correct this and erase the tracktype, and since I have not put this on any other tasks, there is no need for correcting the rest that I have placed roads.  However, because there are so many roads that are previously imported/mapped on nearly every task, it will be inevitable that this may appear on others as well, even the ones that I have not mapped personally.

Also, I appreciate your advice and thank you for it.
clay_c (2022-09-04 23:23:38+00:00): Hi sdvm,

Why did you tag this segment of Capital Boulevard as trunk? This has created an island of trunk highway disconnected from the rest of the network on both ends. This goes against tagging guidelines for trunk roads in the US—could you please undo this change?

-Clay
clay_c (2022-09-06 22:03:09+00:00): No response; reverting changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125876901
b-jazz (2022-10-15 16:41:16+00:00): Looks like something bad happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875016206. Was this intended?
stuff62 POSTNORD (2022-08-30 06:16:04+00:00): Har änrat till gångväg
Allison P (2022-08-30 15:38:45+00:00): OSM is not for just any business listing. If there is no physical presence for your clients to go to, then this cannot be marked. I have removed it.
Warin61 (2022-09-03 00:34:59+00:00): Hi
Mapping buildings as simple nodes is quick. But it is better to map them as closed ways, and even better going from building=yes to building=house...
shashp (2022-09-03 03:59:15+00:00): I attempted to do them all as buildings but may not have done it correctly. I see quite a few in the area just as an address and i'm not sure how to make those into buildings. I'd also love if the manningham council info for the recent buildings changes could be imported but i have no experience exporting from their site into open maps... https://mapping.manningham.vic.gov.au/