piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alzyee (2020-12-16 00:15:49+00:00): It looks like you didn't survey the area and readded roads that no longer exist. While at the same time deleting the real roads
chaturvh (2020-12-16 07:26:49+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, We've reverted the edits and modified the area as per the latest imagery under the changeset (95922439). Apologies for the wrong edit, will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
chaturvh.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-05 22:01:06+00:00): Estimado
Muchas gracias por sus ediciones.
Estos nombres son oficiales? se pueden consultar en alguna parte?
Jonathan_Moralese (2020-11-05 22:51:19+00:00): Hola!

No creo que sean los nombres oficiales, yo he conocido así los senderos. Pero, también tienen otros nombres coloquiales.

Como en ese lugar no existe una entidad y/o comunidad establezca normas o reglas sobre el lugar.

Mas bien somos los mismos ciclistas/senderistas que mantienen la huella de cada sendero.

Seguiré agregando todos los senderos que conozca y con los nombres mas comunes (en ocasiones el nombre del segmento de STRAVA)
Frans S (2020-11-05 15:18:45+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping here.
Plase map a building accurate alongside the roof. Not all over the terrain as you did here.
See my PM about mapping in genereal.
Best regards
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
tordans (2020-11-05 21:33:58+00:00): Danke! In der Nähe von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8084625203/history Ist noch ne kleine Kante im Bordstein um dem Baum Platz zu machen. Kann ich bei Gelegenheit eintragen. VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93604925
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Frans S (2020-11-05 14:50:09+00:00): Hello Balios
Also these mappings are below par.
You mapped them rather accurate but did not square the buildings.
Also you did not move tall buildings to their groundplan
Can you adjust these?
this is task 2183

Best regards
Luzandro (2020-11-06 06:43:49+00:00): Hallo beautifulplaces,

Neulengbach ist zwar dabei die Adressierung zu ändern, aber ich habe so meine Zweifel, dass dir die Stadtgemeinde Neulengbach mitgeteilt hat, die Garnisonstraße würde jetzt ebenfalls Haager Straße heißen.

Wenn es sich bei den bisherigen Nummern um Konskriptionsnummern gehandelt hat (bin mir nicht sicher, ob das überall der Fall ist), kann es sinnvoll sein, die als solche zu erhalten, sodass beide Varianten noch gefunden werden, siehe zB.:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Engelbergweg%205%2C%20Markersdorf#map=19/48.22133/15.93088

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Markersdorf%2029%2C%20Neulengbach#map=19/48.22133/15.93088

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:conscriptionnumber

NICHT sinnvoll ist es jedenfalls mit der Beschreibung "Neue Adressen Neulengbach" einfach bisherige Adressen ersatzlos zu löschen, was du so wie hier großteils getan hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189019551/history

Oder Details bei Straßennamen wegzuschmeißen wie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29306165/history
user_7581226 (2020-11-06 19:09:45+00:00): Diesem Changeset Kommentar geht eine allgemeine Rückfrage zu Neulenbach von meiner Seite voraus. Ich warte aktuell auf die Beantwortung dieser Anfrage.
Negreheb (2020-12-14 07:26:40+00:00): D.h. du hast das geändert bevor du überhaupt eine Info hast, ob das so sein wird?
Luzandro (2020-12-14 07:30:59+00:00): Ich habe seine Fehler schon korrigiert und die Daten aktualisiert
user_7581226 (2020-12-14 09:01:19+00:00): Super Danke,
Neulangbach setzt seine Neuadressierung leider sukzessive um, immer wieder kommen Änderungen über deren Mail Verteiler rein. Siehe auch in meinem Archiv addresshistory.hxg.at 
Frage, erstellst Du weiterhin Adress- Diffs? solche haben sich zu Aufspüren von noch nicht gemappter Gebäude als extrem hilfreich erwiesen. Leider mündet Deine Arbeit -soweit ich erkennen kann- jeweils in getrennt geteilte GDrive Verzeichnisse, so findet man eventuelle Neuerungen nicht. Ich kenne den Hintergrund Deiner Arbeit nicht, speziell durch Deine Arbeit stehen wir aber im internationalen Vergleich relativ gut da, und können so auf Österreich stolz sein. Grüße Johann
PT-53 (2021-01-22 07:40:40+00:00): Hallo Hoschmi72,
müßte an diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851394181/history
nich noch das Merkmal
proposed=residential
gelöscht werden?
(Gefunden auf OSMI-Tagging)
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-01-22 07:43:26+00:00): Hast Du ausreichende Ortskenntnisse und kannst Dir auch diesen Straßenabschnitt noch anschauen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754936061/history#map=19/48.51637/9.05502  ?
Hoschmi72 (2021-01-22 08:28:24+00:00): Hallo PT-53
zu 1) vollkommen richtig, ist bereits korrigiert.
zu 2) Ich kenne den aktuellen Stand der Baustelle leider nicht und komme da in nächster Zeit auch nicht vorbei. Auf dem Plan, den ich hier habe ist auch nicht so genau zu erkennen, ob das überhaupt so erhalten bleiben soll.
PT-53 (2021-01-22 09:21:10+00:00): Hallo Hoschmi72, 
Danke für Deine Rückmeldung.
Grüße
Frans S (2020-11-05 14:47:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
See my PM about mapping.
Your mappings here are below par.
Please take your time to adjust them according to the requirements.
This is Tasl 1648
Best regards
Frans S (2020-11-05 14:43:26+00:00): Hello  Jamie Purvis
Thanks for mapping here.
I've send you a P< about mapping and quality.
Your mappings here are below par and needs to be adjusted.
This is task 549.
Can you take care of that?
Best regards
!bm (2020-11-05 19:27:45+00:00): Hello Krkoska,
the imagery used indicates that at least one level exists for this part of the building – checked w/ multiple (reliable) sources, confirmed and thus reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93621028
– pls have a closer look next time and/or check OSM wiki. Happy mapping! 
--bestregards!bm
Frans S (2020-11-05 14:37:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping,
You overlooked a number of buildings, did not square them did not adjust tall buldings to their footprint.
See my PM I've send to you with tips.
Best regards
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-05 20:52:33+00:00): tenemos que se llama Calle Padre Aldo Davanzo. su nombre real es Calle 3?
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
BCNorwich (2020-11-05 16:15:54+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I'm afraid the description tag, nor the name on its own will be much help in aiding delivery's. Much better to to draw the house and tag it with a full address. 

I've drawn in some building, perhaps you could tag the houses building=house and add the address. Need help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2020-11-05 14:34:03+00:00): Dag Sander.. De landuse heb ik hier los gemaakt van je pad en brug.
Dit waren je eigen edits. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93607647
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens het tekenen.
MVG,
eggie
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
SK53 (2020-11-05 14:21:24+00:00): Hi Humez,

Did you know that there is a tag generator:solar:modules which is used to store a count of the number of solar modules making up a panel? If you scroll down to the advanced tag editor in iD it will autocomplete the value if you type "gener" but watch for "generator:place" too.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
Humez (2020-11-05 14:29:47+00:00): Hi Jerry,

I didn't know about this. I saw someone else had written the number of panels in the description and carried on from there.
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction :)
Kind regards,
Humez
SK53 (2020-11-08 10:56:45+00:00): Hi Humez,

I think when I started mapping them I was doing this, but after a while we decided it was useful information so created a specific tag., and this is tracked on Gregory Williams site (see column "has module count" http://osm.gregorywilliams.me.uk/solar/northampton.html). The good thing is that the information is at least collected.

Before the imagery wasnt often good enough, but now most panels can be counted.

Jerry
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-01-05 19:02:42+00:00): reverti algumas coisas da vitoria em brasilia onde ela criou areas comerciais onde nao havia e nao desfez apos eu avisar
tastrax (2020-11-16 02:54:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2020-11-05 14:36:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

REVIEW  Het gebied van je edits is zo groot als Zeeland en Branbant samen. Beperk je svp tot een straat.
Je edits zijn ook niet goed te controleren. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en kloppen als het goed is precies. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-05 14:39:38+00:00): Tip:  In OSM voegen we niet zelf adressen toe.. Graag bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Bij gebouw omtrek niet naar de daken kijken. het gaat om het maiiveld. Gebouwen zijn precies ingemeten.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-05 14:45:05+00:00): reverted by changeset #93609695

Je kunt een winkel en een kinderharten (geen childcare?)  toevoegen op de bestaande adresnodes. Doe dat svp in verschillende changesets.
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-05 14:56:12+00:00): Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je het doorgeven aan het kadaster middels een terugmelding.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Nieuwenhovenseweg%2022b&resultOffset=0&objectId=0687100004353551&geometry.x=32072.261995727&geometry.y=393085.37199851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0687010004353552

Iet veranderen aan gebouwen heeft geen zin. Bij periodieke update komt de oude vorm weer terug.
Wanneer iets een overkapping (carport) is staat deze niet in het kadaster en kun je die apart intekenen met building roof. Graag ook weer in aparte changesets. Dus niet Nijmegen en Middelburg in één keer uploaden.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
mvg
eggie
Xerini (2020-11-05 15:01:52+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dank je wel, ik ga je bericht goed doorlezen voordat ik verdere aanpassingen maak!

Groetjes, Jochem
eggie (2020-11-05 15:04:58+00:00): info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode.
eggie (2020-11-05 15:08:36+00:00): Dag Jochem... 'k Zie nu dat je hebt gereageerd.
Je info heb ik op de bestaande adresnodes gezet.
kindergarten heb ik omgezet naar childcare.
Mocht je het meer een peuterspeelzaal vinden kun je het nog altijd aanpassen.

Laat je niet weerhouden om gewoon verder te mappen.

MVG,
eggie
Xerini (2020-11-06 11:02:31+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Het is een gastouder, dus voor een groep van maximaal 5 kinderen van 0-4 jaar oud. Ik weet niet goed welke engelse term daar bij past? Hartelijk dank voor de hulp!
Groetjes, Jochem
eggie (2020-11-06 13:52:55+00:00): Zou voor childcare gaan

Zie laatste discussie in dit draadje.  
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71046
User1 - Lightcyphers (2020-11-05 14:41:51+00:00): UKR:Fixed the issues (Crossing highway/waterway;Way terminates on Area)
DressyPear4 (2020-11-06 04:15:31+00:00): Olá, você pode adicionar atributos nas vias existentes ao invés de criar um caminho separado veja em 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
Quando criado em separado, esse deve ser conectado nas vias existentes, caso contrário não irá fazer o roteamentos em apps que usam dados do osm.
André Geraldo Soares (2020-11-06 12:19:37+00:00): Oi, obrigado pelo toque. Estou me inserindo na comunidade que está implementando a ferramenta Ciclomapa em 
Estou mantendo registro de todas as minhas edições para correção, incluindo através de visita in loco.
Nesta ciclofaixa (lane), o problema é que ela não está disponível ao longo de toda a via (Rua Santo Amaro), então eu desenhei uma via nova.
Ainda não sei como conectar uma lane em apenas um trecho da via e o artigo que você me indicou não me pareceu orientar nesse sentido.
André Geraldo Soares (2020-11-06 12:20:30+00:00): Ops, Ciclomapa em https://ciclomapa.org.br/
DressyPear4 (2020-11-06 13:43:36+00:00): Quando for necessário, você pode clicar com botão direito no nó e dividir o segmento da via.
Bom mapeamento.
André Geraldo Soares (2020-11-06 14:26:40+00:00): Opa, aí sim! Acabei de fazer, obrigado.
VictorIE (2020-12-05 23:12:52+00:00): Could you take a look at this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=310308199#map=17/53.64893/-7.50205 missing tags and at least one way.
Geim (2020-11-15 07:45:04+00:00): Waarom heb je building=house hier verwijderd?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258478399/history
Frans S (2020-11-05 15:11:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Difficult mapping here.
See my PM with hints and tips.
Many buildings need still to be placed on their footpring. (adjust also the roads)
This is tasks 2252
Perhaps an easier task is better to map and gain experience.
Best regards and keep mapping
OlivierHaricots (2024-06-15 21:02:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vous contacte car je constate la suppression des deux arrêts de bus que j’ai rajouté en 2021, à savoir Lycée S. Berthelot.

Je reconnais que je n’aurais pas dû y ajouter “(505)” étant donné d’une part que l’on n’indique pas les lignes desservie dans le nom des arrêts, et qu’en plus ceux-ci sont également desservis par la ligne 504.

Cependant, leur suppression d’OSM est une erreur, en effet il s’agit de poteaux distincts des bus urbains, dont le nom de l’arrêt est différent (“Quinet”). L’Abribus est bien partagé, lui, mais pas les poteaux, ni le nom de ceux-ci.

Comment sinon parvenir à trouver ces arrêts “Lycée S. Berthelot” sur OSM, tel que mentionné dans les horaires des lignes 504 et 505?

Je vous saurais dès lors gré de bien vouloir rétablir ces arrêts, dont voici les liens:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8044600092 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8044599802

En vous remerciant d’avance,

Olivier Haricots
AnonymousAlligator (2020-11-05 19:18:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding your business to OpenStreetMap! You changed the entire building into your shop, rather than adding a new point. I've fixed this for you; if you want to update your business info in the future, please modify the new place I created rather than the entire building.
zuicz (2020-11-09 13:27:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93795377 XDD
ja bym zgłosił ;)
osmviborg (2020-11-05 16:05:13+00:00): Hej. Så længe broen kan ses på ortofoto er det bedst at markere den som nedlagt. Rettet.
IpswichMapper (2020-11-12 20:15:35+00:00): Why did you remove the "leisure=park" tag from Hilly Fields? Now it doesn't render properly in the OSM Carto
EdLoach (2020-11-13 09:06:12+00:00): Doing a bit of googling to find our more about the area, it should probably be leisure=nature_reserve rather than leisure=park
rowena2611 (2020-11-13 13:55:36+00:00): I dont believe it is a Nature Reserve though? I'll check again but believe it is a Local Wildlife Site and Scheduled Ancient Monument
rowena2611 (2020-11-13 13:56:46+00:00): See here: https://www.colchester.gov.uk/info/cbc-article/?catid=country-parks-and-local-nature-reserves&id=KA-01615
EdLoach (2020-11-13 17:37:43+00:00): Hilly Fields is a Local Nature Reserve and is included in the data available from https://data.gov.uk/dataset/acdf4a9e-a115-41fb-bbe9-603c819aa7f7/local-nature-reserves-england
rowena2611 (2020-11-13 18:31:04+00:00): OK, thanks, re-added. Odd that CBC doesn't acknowledge as such.
IpswichMapper (2020-11-13 18:56:01+00:00): It still doesn't render properly... what tag should be used to make it render? natural=wood?
IpswichMapper (2020-11-13 18:57:02+00:00): okay no, there are some open areas and some wooded areas. These can be marked seperately
IpswichMapper (2020-11-13 19:03:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94081487#map=13/51.8786/0.8636

Added some "natural=wood" ways in wooded areas, and some "landuse=grass" ways over open areas. (Is the landuse=grass tag correct?)
EdLoach (2020-11-14 07:21:09+00:00): I'd have been tempted to use natural=grassland within a nature reserve, though they get rendered the same.
Walk Colchester (2020-11-20 17:56:42+00:00): I agree, I think natural=grassland would be better in this context?
osmviborg (2020-11-05 16:07:07+00:00): Har justeret dit tag på broen, access:conditional=no når der gælder al færdsel.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 20:03:39+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236676 ?
datendelphin (2020-12-22 15:49:57+00:00): already reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93659961
Frans S (2020-11-20 14:21:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Your mappings are far below par and many of them are removed. It cost more time to correct your mappings rather than map them again.
See this page where you can see your mappings. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94505151
The buildings are mostly good rectangular
The red marked ones are removed.
Best regards
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-30 14:32:49+00:00): Hello zitronenschwarz,

I noticed that you used dirt/sand as value for surface. E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867388191 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867388192

IMO "dirt;sand" should be used (or a single value). See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator

Would you mind changing this?

Cheers
MakeItBetter (2020-11-08 17:14:22+00:00): Hello, I noticed you upgraded many primary roads in the Charlotte area to trunk roads; however, many do not fit the definition. The large majority of WT Harris Blvd, Albemarle Rd, University City Blvd, and at least half of Independence Expressway are not even partially grade separated. They all have many stop lights and have both business and neighborhood entrances directly on the road.

Do you have a source for this, and are you local the area?

OSM road classification:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification#Motorway

Respectfully,
MakeItBetter
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:44:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Dynamikum (2021-05-24 10:40:13+00:00): Hallo, nach https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93612986
hast du dort gemappt. Gut soweit, nur hast du einige gemeinsame Knoten erstellt, das erschwert die Arbeit von anderen oder von dir später. Die Zeit die du sparst müssen andere investieren, fallst Änderungen anstehen.

(landuse Knoten mit Wegeknoten ( Ways))

Gruß

D.
Nakaner (2021-06-06 12:48:59+00:00): Hallo,

ich möchte Dynamikum beipflichten. Wenn sich Landnutzungsflächen die Nodes mit Straßen-Ways (die wir als Mittellinien nur erfassen) teilen, wird die Nachbearbeitung für andere Mapper umständlich. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, künftig nicht mehr Landnutzung und Straßen zu verkleben. Dieses Vorgehen wird in der deutschen OSM-Community ungern gesehen (um es höflich auszudrücken).

Viele Grüße

Michael
VictorIE (2020-11-20 00:41:28+00:00): Hi,

How come you removed the ref=M3?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222488347/history#map=17/54.60515/-5.92333
LateNightTone (2020-11-20 10:02:44+00:00): Hi VictorIE, thanks for spotting - that looks like a mistake on my part, while updating some of the junction refs and destinations. Thanks for fixing!
DD1GJ (2020-11-06 09:47:07+00:00): Hallo ***juggernaut***,

das von Dir benutze ":highway" ist völlig ungebräuchlich und wurde bisher noch nie verwendet. Das Geoportal Baden-Württemberg ist für OSM nicht freigegeben und ist als Quellenangabe nur eine grobe Angabe. Welche Hintergrundkarte/Bild hast Du verwendet? Der von Dir eingezeichnete ehemalige Verlauf ist an einigen Stellen doch etwas ungenau.

Da wären dann noch der ehemalige Sportplatz in Oos, die ehemalige Landebahn, der ehemalige Verlauf der Oos in Sandweier, der ehemalige Landweg nach Sandweier, die ehemaligen Autobahnbrücken in Sandweier, das ehemalige Straßennetz der Rastanlage, ...

Und dann wird die Gegend vor allem für Anfänger total verwirrend und unwartbar.

Ich denke, dass https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Open_Historical_Map dafür besser geeignet ist. Ich glaube, dass da ein Potential vorhanden ist, insbesondere wenn sich eine Verknüpfung mittels Wikidata und/oder der Gemeinsamen Normdatei herstellen lässt, denn da fehlen oftmals die Geodaten. Beispiel https://d-nb.info/gnd/7821438-5

Das war mal hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=48.8162913&mlon=8.212696

Melde Dich bei Interesse bitte direkt bei mir.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Frans S (2020-11-20 15:21:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Just remark. When you map buildings, partly hidden under trees, extrapolate the roof line rather than following the trees
Best regards