piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zarl (2016-09-22 14:18:48+00:00): Hallo, jemand zuhause? Wenn ihr bei Titus wollt, dass die Öffnungszeiten korrekt ausgewertet und zB in den Apps eurer Zielgruppe richtig angezeigt werden, solltet ihr euch vielleicht mal mit der im wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours#Werte erläuterten Syntax anfreunden. Hier ist der aktuell eingetragene Wert mal in einem Prüf-Tool zu sehen: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%3A%2011%3A00%20-%2019%3A00%20h%20Sa%3A%2010%3A00%20-%2019%3A00%20h&DATE=1474553400000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0

Ach, und im Münchner Motorama habt ihr gleich zwei Läden? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/668963

Ciao,
Zarl
ff5722 (2016-12-05 15:39:38+00:00): Het is niet de conventie om een beschrijving als naam van het pad toe te voegen (het veld naam is enkel voor bijvoorbeeld officiële straatnamen). Als de route bekend is  kan deze als relatie worden toegevoegd. Mocht je hierbij hulp nodig hebben dan kan dat op het forum:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
DaveF (2016-09-19 12:21:04+00:00): Hi Joe
This has already been created as a polygon:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55466905
Jakka (2016-09-20 09:08:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4407952093#map=18/51.07540/3.77591
Created a restaurant
Now i see 2 Lunch Garden Whats the good one or are the two diffrent ?
thx to update your edit
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
corky8306 (2016-09-19 11:55:19+00:00): Erased roads now demolished as part of ongoing Mersey Gateway construction
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:09:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
streckenkundler (2017-07-18 20:12:22+00:00): Hei,

Ich hatte hier den Knotenpunkt 71 des Netzes OPR gesehen, Fotografiert und entsprechend erfasst... Warum hast du das wieder entfernt?

Laut Karte http://www.ruppiner-reiseland.de/fileadmin/user_upload/prospekte/pdf/B199_2017_03_TVRL_Knotenpunktkarte_Druck.pdf?download ist dirt auch die Nummer 71...?
streckenkundler (2017-07-18 20:15:49+00:00): vergleiche auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/522362

Sven
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mueschel (2016-09-25 16:45:27+00:00): Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2334120318
"not:adr:postcode" - is this a spelling mistake? 
And "ele = 1st floor" is better tagged as level=1

Cheers, Jan
Robert Whittaker (2016-09-25 16:51:53+00:00): Yes, you're right on both counts (though the ele one wasn't down to me). I've now updated the node.

FYI: the not:addr:postcode is there because that's what's in the FHRS database, but it's wrong. It's a discontinued postcode, so presumably it's an old one for the Centre Parcs site.
rickmastfan67 (2016-09-19 13:19:27+00:00): I'm curious, but why did you delete all the nodes from way 30678350?  Was it by accident, as I don't think PennDOT has reconfigured that ramp onto I-376.  Do you need help in reverting that change only?
Saucon Support (2016-09-19 13:21:38+00:00): Yes please, this change was made accidentally
rickmastfan67 (2016-09-19 13:29:55+00:00): Done. Nodes restored in Changeset 42270667. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42270667
Saucon Support (2016-09-19 13:30:41+00:00): Much appreciated!
Javier Sanchez (2018-01-26 20:40:01+00:00): En relación al etiquetado de colmenas, por favor visita esta página
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-01-02 11:53:17+00:00): Hei, det er ikke en feil å bruke både amenity og building lik kindergarten. Jamfør at kombinasjonen av amenity og building er brukt neste 1 500 000 ganger:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity#combinations
amenity forteller bruke av bygningen, mens building taggen sier at det fysisk er en barnehage-bygning her.

Idieelt sett bør man kartlegge amenity på barnehage område og building=kindergarten bare på bygningen, men jeg er ikke lokalkjent, så jeg la det bare på bygningen. Jeg har fikset dette tilbake igjen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:09:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
katpatuka (2016-10-23 16:10:14+00:00): I wished you'd start mapping a bit more in detail - there's enough imagery available where you've mapped - even if it's mapbox imagery.... (sigh!)
~Jhellico (2016-09-28 07:15:00+00:00): Використання area=yes + highway=* — застаріла практика. Прошу не виправляти area:highway.
Hnatyuk (2016-10-05 16:47:29+00:00): він не зображається. можливо є альтернативний варіант, щоб показувався на карті?
~Jhellico (2016-10-06 05:46:56+00:00): Стандартний Mapnik відображає далеко не все, але це не привід під нього пристосовуватись
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
AndreThib (2019-01-04 22:33:14+00:00): Hello! It looks like lane tags were added to Churchill Street located at 42.366583, -83.091421. However, Churchill street is a oneway up until shortly before it intersects with West Grand Boulevard. I have removed the lane=backward tag in favor of a oneway=yes tag as I believe it better represents the situation. Cheers, Andre
bogdan_andrei (2019-01-07 06:53:16+00:00): Thank you for the update,
Bogdan Petrea
user_5359 (2016-09-19 18:10:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the correct position to the (new added) building. It is right, that the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8853039 is the 7th Way (I think after crossing the US 280/Al 22)?
And please check the way Joseph Street. On the aerial images the street overlaps a building. Is that right?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
nammala (2016-09-20 03:51:12+00:00): Hi  donoterase,

May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings.

cheers,
krishna
donoterase (2016-09-20 18:07:17+00:00): Hi,

I recently deleted the 3 buidings because they were destroyed.
The area was the former "Police office" that moved away in new buildings.

I can send a photo of this area if needed

Best regards,

donoterase
nammala (2016-09-21 03:29:23+00:00): Hi donoterase,

Thanks for coming back to us and confirming.

cheers,
krishna
GiorgioL (2017-05-29 11:30:41+00:00): ciao, questa porzione di strada risulta ancora chiusa? Dal commento alla nota i lavori dovrebbero essere finiti. grazie mille
Supaplex (2016-09-19 16:12:34+00:00): Is this place really have an ATM?
lostmike (2016-09-19 16:15:23+00:00): This looks like an error to me. Did you mean to add a new tag with the name in your language?
trigpoint (2016-09-19 16:41:47+00:00): Reverting
Alecs01 (2016-09-24 13:41:43+00:00): Please note you renamed the statue instead of the church (and language is not italian for sure), corrected.
platlas23 (2016-09-19 15:05:24+00:00): removing meaningless name
DavidKewley (2016-09-20 06:41:01+00:00): Debbie, thank you for joining OSM and making edits. I have comments about your first three edit changesets today. In this changeset you deleted 12 amenities near Paseo Colorado, but I did a spot check online and it looks like at least some of them still exist in these locations. Did you delete them deliberately in OSM? If so, why? Thanks!
Debbie Kovalsky (2016-09-20 10:31:48+00:00): I apologize - can we reverse this?
DavidKewley (2016-09-21 01:03:46+00:00): Reversed yesterday.
Carnildo (2016-09-19 16:55:43+00:00): Where did you get your information about the pond you added near Warden?  The aerial imagery looks to me like it's farmland, not water.
SathyaPendyala (2016-09-19 17:03:45+00:00): Are you referring to the change set 42273368? It's a baseball field.
Carnildo (2016-09-19 19:09:25+00:00): I'm referring to way 443209289: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443209289
SathyaPendyala (2016-09-19 20:41:39+00:00): Yes. You're absolutely correct. It's just farmland. It's my mistake. Thanks for pointing that.
Müszi (2016-10-02 11:13:21+00:00): Salut!

Conform hotărârii nr. 38 din 08.09.2015 al consiliului local Gârda de Sus [1], DC260 este drumul Ghețar - Munună - Gârda Seacă.

Conform [2], drumul Izvoarele (DN 75) Dobreşti - Gârda Seacă - Plişti este DC132.

Corectez pe hartă.

-- 
Zsolt


[1] http://www.primariagardadesus.ro/download.php?id=419&securityhash=da549c0760b9789da7261c95cbef2de5

[2] http://download.documents.tips/getdownload/document/?id=BrnXexR30dtbXyjtyDlJVEpf3L2N8jNe7HnFr9poPPIY5JNG6cvZl0fXPq%2FCIssvAduOqHhLEb08KUqit2iqIg%3D%3D
DavidKewley (2016-09-20 06:45:35+00:00): Debbie, in this changeset you deleted building outlines for one of the buildings on the Pasadena Presbyterian Church property, as well as the buildings for Messerian Oriental Rugs and Community Bank. A quick check online suggest they may all still be there. Did you delete them deliberately, and if so, why? Thanks!
Debbie Kovalsky (2016-09-20 10:31:19+00:00): I apologize, I didn't realize that my changes were going to effect everyone's view.  Can we reverse this?
DavidKewley (2016-09-20 11:39:24+00:00): Hi Debbie, no problem, this is a pretty common misunderstanding by folks who are just starting to use OSM. I had similar confusions myself when starting. I successfully revered the changes here and in the other changeset we discussed. so we should be all set. If I can help you with anything in OSM in future, feel free to write me: http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/DavidKewley Hope you'll keep contributing, now that you know that you can help improve the map for everyone. :)
uvaone (2016-09-19 16:02:35+00:00): updated existing pathway in chapelfields,
Janjko (2016-11-06 23:20:36+00:00): Pozdrav,
kakvo je ovo umjetničko djelo naziva "Hrovje zrncic" ispred doma Prpa? Izgleda mi kao greška.
demon_box (2017-02-27 22:06:14+00:00): ciao, name=sentiero (già di per sè sbagliato perchè è un descrittivo generico e non un vero nome) e tra l'altro si tratta di una highway=track.... ????
grazie.
user_4547543 (2016-09-19 16:54:32+00:00): Should read: Edits in Guyana. KG ground survey 2016
indigomc (2016-10-26 15:08:10+00:00): Reverted - see previous discussions about this contributor's edits and the forum discussion at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56164
muralito (2016-09-19 20:57:41+00:00): ¿Lo que no es Megal, que le llamaste "Fedriko Casa", es domicilio particular?
demon_box (2017-02-27 22:04:44+00:00): ciao, highway=track connessa al multipoligono landuse=forest anzichè all'altra highway=track sulla quale in realtà si congiunge...
grazie.
user_5359 (2016-09-19 18:13:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An address can't be a street.   And I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-23 21:56:56+00:00): Hello,
Neither https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4408345394 nor https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4408419791 have a valid name on them.  You'll need to use a proper editor for editing names, because (through no fault of yours) MAPS.ME doesn't allow names to be edited.
Best Regards,
Andy
frosm (2019-12-20 15:43:18+00:00): bonjour,
que voulez-vous dire wiki=yes by permission ?"
qu'il y a un accès wifi pour les gens utilisé le lieu ? gratuit ou payant ?
indigomc (2016-10-26 15:07:14+00:00): Reverted - see previous discussions about this contributor's edits and the forum discussion at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56164
maciek-szn (2016-09-20 14:58:31+00:00): Don't do this again. There are no construction works!
Alecs01 (2016-09-23 16:07:58+00:00): I believe it should be "Supermercato Di Meglio", corrected
Piz Pachific (2016-09-19 20:17:25+00:00): Hallo Bruno. Mit diesem Changeset führt jetzt der eine Fussweg durch das Restaurant Blume. Bitte korrigieren, Danke. Lg
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-26 11:51:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42443252
user_5359 (2016-09-21 19:51:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Владимир К (2016-09-20 13:14:30+00:00): и что же, парковка стала парком для троллейбусов? и вы забыли тэг parking=surface
mueschel (2016-09-20 10:44:18+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
die destination-Tags mit :to haben das :to weiter hinten, direkt vor dem :lanes, z.B. destination:ref:to. Und wenn das symbol wie an diesem Weg zum ref:to gehört, dann darf es gerne auch symbol:to heißen.
Ich habe beides gerade geändert
Gruß, Jan
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206648363
Andreas Binder (2016-09-20 15:20:36+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur des Drehers. Hab gerade gesehen, dass ich den noch paar mal drin hatte (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42301698)
DemoLogin (2016-09-19 19:08:42+00:00): поправка: отметил пешеходный переход
Øukasz (2016-09-23 20:49:53+00:00): wow, thanks for your Iraq edits... really impressive amount of work!
gileri (2016-09-19 19:14:21+00:00): source should be empty, hit 'send' too quickly
BC Hiker (2016-09-20 17:53:07+00:00): Please have a look at the wiki and follow tagging standards.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Peilscheibe (2016-09-22 16:05:52+00:00): Hi, die Stromleitung, die Du hier "verlängert" hast, wurde die wieder aufgebaut?
pschaefer (2016-09-22 21:06:15+00:00): War eine Annahme aufgrund der Luftbilder. Hab sie wieder zurückgebaut. Muss mal bei Gelegenheit vor Ort gehen.
Peilscheibe (2016-09-23 06:19:23+00:00): Nu, die Bing-Aufnahmen sind ja schon was älter ...
Zwischen Renningen und der Kleingartenanlage war die Freileitung im Sommer definitiv weg. Ob von dort aus Richtung Magstadt noch was steht, müsste man nachschauen.
ABausD (2017-05-14 01:10:26+00:00): The use of the name badge is incorrect. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
I corrected it.
ABausD (2017-05-14 01:11:58+00:00): Sorry
The use of the name tag is incorrect. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
I corrected it.
Filip009 (2022-04-17 10:04:07+00:00): Dobrý deň, ďalšia cesta, ktorá má meno a nedáva mi zmysel. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443251496
Mirecnet (2022-04-17 13:20:00+00:00): Opat stare spusty na drevo, ktore dorazila vodna erozia.
Opravene  >>> natural=gully
Filip009 (2022-04-17 21:41:53+00:00): Ešte máme dva také na Slovensku: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hKo
Mirecnet (2022-04-19 10:17:25+00:00): Poznam - https://overpass-turbo.eu

Ked sa nudim, tak si to pustam, Co sa v poslednom case deje malokedy :)
Opravene.
Hjart (2016-09-19 21:53:54+00:00): Bemærk at hvis der bruges en udenlandsk version af Maps.me (ved at vælge f.eks. engelsk på sin telefons brugerflade), så vil Maps.me som standard gemme navne i det specifikke navnerum man har valgt. I dette tilfælde blev "OSramhuset" skrevet i "name:en" (det engelske navnerum). Jeg har rettet det, men ellers ville man kun kunne have læst navnet på et kort med fokus på engelske navne.
RCFoster (2016-10-26 21:46:29+00:00): This isn't a highway.  It's a boulevard and has a speed limit of 30mph.  I know because I live in this city and travel through here frequently.
BeKri (2017-02-09 20:41:13+00:00): Servus,
Du warst doch in Ettenheimmünster spazieren ...
Kann es sein, dass das Haus südlich vom Sonnenweg eigentlich die Nummer 2 sein müsste und die zwei nördlich die 1 und 1a
(die 1 südlich in LGL-BW schlicht falsch ist ?)
sperlingskauz (2017-02-22 20:01:06+00:00): Hallo Bernhard,
Danke für den Hinweis. Habe Maps4BW in Kombination mit Bing genauer angeschaut und bin zum Schluss gekommen, dass die Nr. stimmt aber die Strasse falsch war. Dies habe ich nun korrigiert, sowie Zufahrtsstraßen ergänzt.
Viele Grüße,
Uta
BeKri (2017-02-22 20:08:04+00:00): Servus Uta,
so mog I dös ;-))
Lösung gefunden und weiter geht's
mit happy tagging.
Grüße zurück, derBeKri
maraf24 (2016-09-19 21:04:39+00:00): Ten Kondrat na Słowiczej 19 to chyba bardziej sklep z winem, a nie bar?
KornelJa (2016-09-19 21:15:39+00:00): Racja. Zmieniam.
下り専門 (2016-09-19 21:42:15+00:00): いま、ポイント選んだときに「施設」となっている部分をクリックして、検索のところに「薬局」と入力して出てきたリストの中から薬局を選んでみてください。
joost schouppe (2016-10-07 19:04:28+00:00): Hi,
You added the name of the village to this house number. The name is only for the name of the object itself, so it would only make sense if the house was called "Cadzand". I removed the name, but if you explain what you were trying to do, I might be able to help.
tyr_asd (2016-09-20 08:27:51+00:00): Was ist jetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371926986 (und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5523273)?
luschi (2016-09-20 15:46:45+00:00): Ups...hab ich wohl übersehen.
Danke für den Hinweis.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42302398
trigpoint (2016-09-20 11:51:02+00:00): HI, something has gone wrong here. The pub now has two names, not your fault as maps.me is very broken when it comes to name tags. Which name is correct?
Jethro10 (2016-09-20 12:06:44+00:00): Ah I see what it's done. It's recently changed to The Spotted Pig, I've fixed it along with another one I did at the same time that's also wrong, The Tithe Barn a few miles away.
A shame that because Maps.me is an excellent map product I use loads and do add quite a few things with it as well. However I'll refrain from name changing with it until they get it sorted.
Jethro10 (2016-09-20 12:08:37+00:00): Are you aware if it's actually been reported as a bug to Maps.me?
trigpoint (2016-09-20 12:20:31+00:00): There is a bug reported 
https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/4149
Jethro10 (2016-09-20 12:23:12+00:00): Ah, well debated!
Anyhow, my two are fixed and I'll try and remember to avoid it in future.
thanks
user_5359 (2016-09-21 20:03:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

You have add many diffferent description parts in the name of the building!
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:36:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:38:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:43:16+00:00): If this is a building, mark this with building=yes instead with area=yes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Hjart (2016-09-19 21:37:30+00:00): Please note that this is not a bookmarking service.
jumbanho (2016-09-19 23:42:09+00:00): Thanks, even if it was forced!  The houses look good.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:44:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

if you can buy toys there, please add shop=toys.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:47:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:50:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! To define a bank, we use the tag amenity=bank, not the wiki data definition!
trigpoint (2016-09-20 11:52:30+00:00): HI, something has gone wrong here. The shop now has two names, not your fault as maps.me is very broken when it comes to name tags. Which name is correct?
trisosaurus (2016-09-21 10:58:26+00:00): Hi, yeah i think i'll stick to making changes on OSM; it is now called 'Best One Local'
user_5359 (2016-09-22 18:53:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-20 12:14:00+00:00): czegoś zabrakło w tym rondzie...
chillly (2016-09-30 12:44:47+00:00): Are the buildings really separate? Is there really a gap between them that I could walk between or see down? The aerial imagery seems to show that the are connected. If they are connected, drawing them as individual buildings is useful, but they should have overlapping walls to show they are connected. Look at the way the semi-detached houses are drawn nearby on Cottingham Road. If you need help with this, please reply and I will discuss the edit or make a change for you. I want to help you get this right.
Gazer75 (2016-10-17 18:59:40+00:00): Du har laga alt for komplisert kryss mellom rv3 rampar og fv215/601. Heilt unødvedig og kan lage rare problem for ruting software.
Skal heller ikkje vere eigen "way" for avkøyringsfelt (Haugedalsveien mot rv3) i OSM. Bruk heller turn:lanes=
chillly (2016-09-30 12:39:59+00:00): It is a good idea to add the approximate outline of a building. I would add a fixme tag, such as fixme=the outline is a rough guess. That way it will show up on QA tools to help it get a more accurate outline when more details are available.
scruss (2016-09-20 00:19:58+00:00): and that "yesh" was a typo for "yes"; I'm relatively well-disposed to the band ☺
chillly (2016-09-28 12:26:17+00:00): Is Unit 1 the address? If so that belongs in an address field, not the name field.
yurasi (2017-01-10 14:41:51+00:00): Hi Sheidaii,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added several objects in this area that aren't visible on Bing satellite imagery, maybe you added them objects based on any special source? It would be great if you share the source which can be referred to.
Anas_G (2016-09-20 20:44:26+00:00): Mais.. tu m'as piqué mon rajout ! :)
Anas_G (2016-09-20 20:46:06+00:00): Pourquoi est-ce que la recherche « Olivier millénaire » donne un résultat, alors que ce que j'ai rajouté « Olivier punique » ne donne rien ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-09-22 17:49:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 42353289, 42346185 where the changeset comment is: Revert large changeset following request to DWG by changeset author
mweper (2016-09-20 16:03:41+00:00): Hola serock.
¿Sabés como y donde está puesto el radar en ese lugar?

Eso se puede mapear mejor con relaciones, pero se necesita saber donde está el radar en sí, a que dirección apunta y para que manos tiene efecto.
serock (2016-09-22 13:27:53+00:00): Hola mweper, lo que hice fue mover la cámara de lugar y agregar el limite de 60km/h.
Movi de aca: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1987099192/history
para aca: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588380449/history.