piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chnav (2019-01-17 12:21:20+00:00): Manlik 
Посмотри историю объекта, я там не прикасался.
Dinamik (2019-01-17 15:25:38+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Вы удалили ряд объектов, например:
1) парковка - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207539033,
2) пешеходная дорожка - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227018573
3) калитка - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2357499759.
4) часть внешнего контура area:highway - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196215881

Прошу Вас разъяснить причины, по которым Вы удаляете данные из базы, восстановить удалённые/повреждённые в данном пакете правок объекты и не удалять данные, добавленные другими редакторами, в последующих Ваших правках.
Dinamik (2019-01-18 21:55:17+00:00): Дополнение к списку объектов, причины удаления которых не ясны:
5) шлагбаум - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2161565019
6) знак "въезд запрещён" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2770225
7) шлагбаум - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2185013851
8) знак "въезд запрещён" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2790338
canfe (2019-05-24 13:08:25+00:00): mi pare abbia add:street di troppo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6215948948
Jrachi (2019-05-24 16:02:34+00:00): Provvedo a toglierlo.
eggie (2019-01-17 11:05:54+00:00): Dag Joey.. bollards zijn altijd lastig... 
De tags die je toevoegt zijn al default, maar kwaad kan het niet. 
Een motor_vehicle routeert nooit via een bollard. 
MVG,
Eggie
Carto'Cité (2019-01-23 17:57:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté des pistes cyclables (highway=cycleway) telles que celle-ci (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664105327) sur des routes qui précisaient déjà la présence de bande cyclables (cyclway=lane sur un way qui décrit la route). Je me permet de vous contacter car j'ai un doute sur le fait qu'il s'agisse vraiment de pistes cyclables car la confusion entre piste cyclable et bande cyclable est commune et de plus vous avez laissé l'information concernant la présence de bandes cyclables. Je vous remercie par avance pour les informations complémentaires que vous pourriez m'apporter.
Cordialement.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
chnav (2019-01-31 05:50:06+00:00): Здравствуйте, это парковка-здание, зачем вы удалили тег building ? Пожалуйста будьте внимательнее. Спасибо.
chnav (2019-01-31 05:52:57+00:00): Ok, I see, the Bing imagery is outdated here. Please DO NOT remove or change features unless you sure what are you doing. Thanks.
chnav (2019-01-31 05:53:12+00:00): You changeset has been completely reverted.
Horza (2019-01-17 16:57:38+00:00): I double checked, these all exist, but you should add a comment with your sources because otherwise, it looks like you could have just lifted it directly from Google

Plus it's best practice and a good habit to get into

Happy future mapping though! I realise this is your first edit, just be careful and don't source copyrighted works (I don't know if you have or not)
eggie (2019-01-17 11:25:00+00:00): Dag LindhoutJ,

Tip: Ik zie dat je goed bezig bent met de landuse. Je doet dit met editor iD. Dat is meer een speeltje met grote beperkingen. 
Overweeg de overstap naar een volwassen editor als JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Je hebt dan veel meer achtergronden zoals de BGT en hoogtereliefkaarten voor de paden.
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Vanuit het forum promoten wij editor JOSM. 

MVG,
Eggie
Tilia_J (2019-01-17 11:29:15+00:00): ID is inderdaad wat "aanmodderen". Ik ben eerst maar eens ID gaan proberen omdat ik over JOSM las dat dit een steile leercurve heeft. Ik ga een dezer dagen JOSM eens installeren
eggie (2019-01-17 11:33:53+00:00): Oke .. valt reuze mee... Zorg wel dat je de juiste kaarttekenstijlen goed instelt . Dus alle routes OV, fiets (colorize bicycleroutes)  en wandelroutes zichtbaar. Zelf eb ik 'm ingesteld als potlatch2 als achtergrond. Die is het duidelijkst.
Ook multipolygonen maken. Bv een stukje heide omring met bos is een eitje.
Ook zijn er legio plugins om een stukje heide uit te snijden. 
Aarzel niet om iets te vragen.
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-17 11:34:45+00:00): M'n toetsenbord kan mijn typsnelheid niet bijhouden zie ik nu.
dval (2019-03-07 09:49:05+00:00): Дома 1, 2, 3 по Запрудной есть, а самой улицы как будто нет. Валидатор http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SVE/addr/4 сообщает еще о многих ошибках в Н.Серьгах. Используйте редактор JOSM для рисования и правок, в нем есть хорошие инструменты для этого.
Geofreund1 (2019-05-05 19:19:13+00:00): Hallo dino,
du hast im Neubaugebiet "Warret III" mehrere Grundstücksgrenzen mit Flurstücknummern eingetragen. Was ist der Zweck dieser Eintragungen und was ist die Quelle der Daten? Außerdem sind Glasfaser-Hausanschlüsse gemappt. Das ist auch nicht gerade Standard.
dino (2019-05-06 10:10:28+00:00): Hi,
die Flurstück-Daten wurden aus den Veröffentlichungen im Amtsblatt, den öffentlichen Bebauungsplänen und von Luftbildern abgeleitet - da  bei Bauangelegenheiten im Amtsblatt immer die Flurstück-Nummer angegeben wird, finde ich Ihre Erfassung sinnvoll.
Geofreund1 (2019-05-06 12:43:43+00:00): Mal unterstellt, dass deine Datenquelle ok ist, so werden doch die Flurstücke auf keiner mir bekannten OSM basierten Karte dargestellt. Was nützt das dann einem Bauwilligen?
Qualitätssicherungswerkzeuge meckern deine Einträge an, weil keine Tags vorhanden sind. Auch die Eintragung von Glasfaseranschlüssen per note halte ich für problematisch. Notes sind nur für Mapper gedacht.
Überleg dir vielleicht noch mal, ob du diese Eintragungen beibehalten willst, vor allem im Licht, dass du offenbar der einzige (?) bist, der so mappt.
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-06 10:26:21+00:00): باسلام. آقا بهزاد عزیز زیباسازی که روی نقشه انجام می دهید قابل تقدیر است؛ ضمن خسته نباشید، بعضی موارد رو یادآوری میکنم. اتصالهایی از مسیر که به وسیله جداکننده (جدول، مانع یا...) مشخص شده اند  دو اتصال گذاشته می شود. در غیر این صورت مثلا در سه راهی های حتی بزرگ که یک اتصال پیوسته (بدون جدا شدن به صورت رفت و برگشت) دارند باید یک اتصال گذاشته شود.
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-06 10:28:11+00:00): زیباسازی نقشه و تکمیل آن پسندیده است اما از واقعی بودن نقشه غافل نشویم.
موفق و سلامت باشید
Manlik (2019-01-17 12:00:57+00:00): Там спецприёмник под именем светофор.
chnav (2019-01-17 12:19:56+00:00): Manlik
Посмотри историю объекта, я там не прикасался.
chnav (2019-01-17 12:22:44+00:00): Не туда написал.

Serik Tleuov  
Пожалуйста не меняйте теги злданий, было здание, вы сменили на землепользование.
chnav (2019-01-17 12:22:52+00:00): исправил обратно.
chnav (2019-01-17 12:23:56+00:00): surface=asphalt 

Пожалуйста используйте стандартные теги. Спасибо.
Maturi0n (2019-01-23 11:47:20+00:00): Please stop these kind of edits. They violate OSM's on the ground truth rule and will only be reverted. This only causes more work for everyone. If you think Abkhazia should be mapped primarily in Georgian, please use the forum and start a discussion.
John_Harris (2019-01-23 17:14:00+00:00): You are interpreting "on the ground truth rule" wrongly. Am I change name in Abkhazian? NO! But you do change names in English or German? Why? Do you think English or German call it Tkuarchal, Sukhum, or Gygrjgnripsh or etc? No! Those languages have their standards and history. So don't try to fool anyone. What you do is a vandalism. Respect each name for each language!
John_Harris (2019-01-23 17:17:03+00:00): Also, when I edit I provide sources, where are your sources for each object you do revert or edit here?
Maturi0n (2019-01-23 18:20:40+00:00): As a native speaker of German and as someone having a very high fluency in English, I can assure you that 99,9% of speakers of those languages have never heard of Gyachripsh/Leselidze and almost every other place in Abkhazia. With the exception of Sukhumi, there is no native name for any city or village in Abkhazia in either English or German. So the only purpose these transcriptions fulfill is enabling foreigners to pronounce place names.

The point is, for someone who speaks German or English and can't read Cyrillic and happens to be in Abkhazia, the old Soviet / Georgian names are useless. They are not used on signs anymore and younger people who weren't born during Soviet times often don't know these names anymore. So when you ask a local for Gyachripsh, he will understand, but when you ask a 20-something about Leselidze he is likely to not know what place you mean. Leselidze is a name no longer used on the ground. 

The only place in Abkhazia which is at least somewhat known in the German-speaking countries is Sukhumi. Most German media refers to it as "Suchumi".
John_Harris (2019-01-24 17:01:58+00:00): What you say it is a matter of transliteration, so if Abkhazians use different names there must be transliteration of Abkhaz names and that's it. I would recommend to write that transliteration (into Latin alphabet) next to main name. 

Copy-pasting separatist called names in all other languages has no justification. Also, those names were changed by separatist authorities and their decision has no power for French, Greek or German languages. What is more important old Soviet/Georgian names are recognized and used as international versions even in UN.

I agree that "on the ground rule" must be respected. But that rule encompass only so called those languages that are used on signs (i.e. Russian and Abkhazian) all other languages automatically do use Soviet/Georgian names, as they recognize  Georgian sovereignty on this territory or in some cases use their own historical naming for some settlements (like Turks for Tbilisi (Tiflis) and Akhaltshike (Ahiska)).
John_Harris (2019-01-24 20:38:41+00:00): What you say is your personal view or experience but others can say otherwise (or can provide other links). For that reason OSM uses sources, and as I can see here for such cases Wikipedia is accepted as a good source. When entering wikidata it gives proper names automatically.
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Jakka (2019-01-17 15:57:28+00:00): Is er hier nu een nieuwe tunnel geplaatst ? onder de A11 Laatste luchtbeelden is er niets te zien....
Jakka (2019-01-17 15:59:15+00:00): Blijkbaar wel http://www.a11verbindt.be/category/herinrichting-heistlaan
Jakka (2019-01-17 16:07:26+00:00): Of was het deze dat je bedoelde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321686520
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Jakson Aquino (2019-01-17 15:54:01+00:00): Please, don't believe the satellite images. They are outdated. Fortaleza's mayor is continuously creating what is called binary (one street one way in one direction and other parallel street in the opposite direction) and some people who live in the city are continuously updating the map.
In the case of this road, it's too narrow for cars. It's much safer to choose another route.
Madhubala Srinivasan (2019-01-23 10:22:37+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I observed cars in Esri World imagery (lat/lon:-3.7294471, -38.4697683) which indicated that these roads are navigable. In such cases, should this not be tagged with lower priority (residential)-Highway class rather than footway? 

Thanks for your help and advice.
Madhubala Srinivasan
Jakson Aquino (2019-01-23 12:59:08+00:00): I almost never drive in this neighborhood, but I went there once and it was very complicated to drive on some narrow, unpaved, bumpy roads. I guess that a good advice for drivers that don't know very well the neighborhood is to prioritize the major paved residential roads and avoid the irregular, unpaved ones even if this means to drive a longer route. But if you can see cars on the road, then, I agree that technically it's not a footway.
Madhubala Srinivasan (2019-01-24 10:45:12+00:00): Thanks for your prompt response and i am going to refix/change the attribute from footway to residential, as it is evident on image.
Thank you.
Madhubala Srinivasan
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Baloo Uriza (2019-01-17 23:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66410996 where the changeset comment is: Reverting SEO spam
mueschel (2019-01-20 14:48:56+00:00): Hi,
what's the meaning of "nsg_ref"? It's not used in any other place. Maybe a typo?

Cheers, 
Jan
Robert Whittaker (2019-01-20 18:14:23+00:00): NSG stands for the "National Street Gazetteer". See https://www.geoplace.co.uk/streets/managing/what-is-the-nsg . The NSG reference number seems to be the only ID on non-road highways in Suffolk County Council's List of Streets (https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/road-adoption/streets-maintained-by-suffolk-county-council/), so I used that in the tagging.

So it's not a typo, but I don't know if there's a better tag for that particular type of reference number.
mueschel (2019-01-20 18:22:05+00:00): It's common to use keys of the form "ref:XYZ", so "ref:nsg" in your case.
Apart from this I don't know anything better at the moment.
Robert Whittaker (2019-01-21 08:51:25+00:00): For reference numbers on highways it's also very common to use XYZ_ref. For example, we have prow_ref, unsigned_ref, highway_ref and highway_authority_ref, ncn_ref, rcn_ref all in extensive use.
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Sanniu (2019-04-17 07:01:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664123658 have no tags, can you fix it?
chnav (2019-01-17 12:31:47+00:00): Пожалуйста комбинируй правки в одном changeset, например несколько зданий одновременно. Тебя просили об этом много раз, чтобы ты не плодил правки.  
Спасибо.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-01-17 13:55:06+00:00): Welcom to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.

This looks good. You've connected the footpath to the road correctly, and added extra details about the path (dirt).

Did you know about the "bird hide" tag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbird_hide ) Perhaps you should add that too
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
M!dgard (2019-01-17 12:44:07+00:00): Ref: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66369080
Piskvor (2019-01-17 15:26:39+00:00): Tohle asi nedává úplně smysl... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station Možná nabíjecí stanice s access=private?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Palolo (2019-01-21 20:15:35+00:00): @bowmani We appreciate the effort, however, the HOT task asks for buildings only. You tagged a path as a secondary highway with a motorway junction. Please follow the directions and stick to buildings for these tasks.
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
lmagreault (2019-01-17 13:31:59+00:00): historic=memorial est plus adapté pour un petit édifice que historic=monument
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66395730
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
eggie (2019-01-17 17:00:20+00:00): Dag Broombroom. Is het nog wel een NL:G13 fietspad? Ik was hier zelf de voorgaande mapper.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66396098
MVG,
Eggie
BroemBroem (2019-01-18 12:00:58+00:00): Hoi Eggie, Ja het is nog steeds een NL:G13 fietspad.
MVG,
Broombroom
eggie (2019-01-18 13:36:14+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.
HG,
Eggie
abrensch (2019-01-20 12:42:46+00:00): Hallo pingufromwoodquarter,

diese neue B37 Auffahrt braucht aber noch bisschen Pflege, da sind ja noch die Feldweg-Attribute dran...

Gruss, Arndt
Piskvor (2019-01-17 15:05:50+00:00): Rwanda roads #1? Asi jen chyba v popisku :)
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Carto'Cité (2019-01-23 16:40:10+00:00): Bonjour jldechamp,
Je me permet de te contacter pour savoir pourquoi tu as précisé que les vélos étaient interdits sur cette portion de Avenue du Président Salvador Allende (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380556399). Y-a-t'il vraiment une indication d'interdiction ? Cette route me semble autorisée aux vélos mais il y a peut-être eu une modification récemment. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
jldechamp (2019-01-24 08:32:23+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est normale , cette portion est bien bien interdite aux vélos depuis la création d'une piste cyclable distincte parallèle à cette portion (novembre).J'ai demandé à mon équipe de mettre à jour sur osm l'intégralité des pistes cyclables,parking à vélos, limitation de vitesse, zone etc ainsi que la vérification des attributs.La piste devrait être intégrée prochainement. 
Jluc
Carto'Cité (2019-01-24 18:04:13+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Luc,
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris le temps de me faire un retour. Je te prie de m'excuser d'avoir pris ça pour une erreur. Si ton équipe tarde à intégrer les éléments de cyclabilité que tu évoques, n'hésites pas à nous les transmettre, nous pourrons également les ajouter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
kapazao (2019-01-17 17:47:44+00:00): No comprendo bien los cambios que estás haciendo quitando la información de la relación para ponerla en el edificio. Me parece que estaba correcto como estaba antes.
De todas formas creo que estaría bien revisar cómo están hechos otros estadios y plazas de toros para ver cuál es la mejor manera.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66396697
zaizone (2019-01-18 08:54:41+00:00): Ola ! Disculpe, continúo la conversación en inglés, mi español no es muy bueno. 
In fact, since a few days, I'm reviewing editions from a contributor "stadiaarcadia" about stadiums all over the world. 
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8570285
This guy has removed most of the "leisure"="stadium" tags to replace it by "building"="stadium" tags. It's a big problem because it removes many places from the leisure "collection". 
In the case of "Estadio de Los Carmenes", I have just transfered the attribute informations (wikipedia, website...) to the outer bound of the stadium separating it from the "building"="stadium" item.
zaizone (2019-01-18 09:08:09+00:00): Let me precise something, when reading the wiki about stadiums https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dstadium we can note that "leisure"="stadium" tag don't have to be on a multipolygon because it is supposed to contain all the stadium facility, not only the buildings. So, if you have a closer look at the edits on "Estadio de los Carmenes" you will see that the "leisure"="stadium" tag was inappropriately attributed to the buildings only, even before stadiaarcadia's edits. My contributions were in order to fix this, but you can suggest a better way to do, I will be pleased to improve that area, and also my mapping techniques. 
Gracias
lmagreault (2019-01-17 15:09:06+00:00): J'ai ajouté memorial=war_memorial qui indique que c'est un monument aux morts (durant la guerre) et supprimé le nom qui n'apportait pas d'info en plus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66396811
André W (2019-01-17 18:37:49+00:00): Wurden hier die kürzlich die Bäume gefällt? Ansonsten ist es für mich doch eher Wald (wie bisher eingetragen) statt Weide aufgrund der vielen Bäume und Sträucher

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.699229446287916&lng=7.4632539600203245&z=17&pKey=vrQCtM66YS85urm6RG1lQQ&focus=photo&x=0.5113462118572346&y=0.6281765095343106&zoom=0
Carto'Cité (2019-01-23 16:33:23+00:00): Bonjour Stéphane,
Je me permet de te contacter pour savoir pourquoi cette portion n'est pas « praticable en vélo ». Est-ce qu'il y a une indication qui interdit le passage des vélos ou est-ce que tu juge qu'elle n'est pas adaptée au vélo et dans ce cas il vaudrait mieux voir comment décrire cela plutôt que de dire que le vélo y est interdit, ce que veut dire bicycle=no. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
StéphanePAPIN (2019-01-23 16:57:54+00:00): Bonjour.
Testé un soir. techniquement pas interdit aux vélos : c'est juste un passage sou terrain sous la ligne SNCF, il faut descendre environ 30 marches et en remonter autant. Donc avec un vélo pas très adpaté, encore moins un VAE d'une 20ène de kilo.
Carto'Cité (2019-01-23 17:20:09+00:00): Re-bonjour,
Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. Dans la pratique il vaut mieux renseigner la présence de ces marches, ce qui aura pour conséquence de « décourager » la plupart des calculateurs d'itinéraires mais permettra aux personne acceptant les escaliers d'y passer ; ce que permettent certains calculateurs et qui peut être pratique pour les VTTistes par exemple. Mettre bicyle=no est réservé pour préciser une interdiction et n'est donc pas adapté ici.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
maraf24 (2019-01-18 00:30:57+00:00): Nie ma tu takiej ulicy i nigdy nie będzie, przechodzi przez prywatną posesję.
lmagreault (2019-01-17 15:04:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y avait déjà un nœud pour La Menthe Sauvage :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3195878949 mais il a des tags adresse et n'apparaît pas dans le rendu. Peut-être supprimer les tags hors adresse du nœud 3195878949, reprendre les infos qui ne sont pas en doublon sur le nouveau nœud 6216303251 et ajouter caterer=yes pour dire que c'est aussi un traiteur ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66397399
tbarthelet (2019-01-22 10:56:49+00:00): En effet, j'ai créé un doublon car depuis ID je ne pouvais pas indiquer à la fois un traiteur et une boulangerie. J'ai fusionné les tags et affecté l'adresse au bâtiment.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66397399
eggie (2019-01-18 15:19:05+00:00): Volgens mij kun je beter alles op de adresnode zetten ook name=  en de duplikaatinfo verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie