piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aharvey (2019-05-10 07:02:50+00:00): JOSM validation is not authoritative, mappers can overrule it to help express exactly what's on the ground more accuratly. For example a highway=footway might be tagged bicycle=designated + foot=designated to indicate it is a shared pedestrian/cycle path. both =designated tags indicate that both these modes are designated on this path and have equal use.

Could you clarify why those buildings around pyrmont were deleted?

In my opinion it's best to leave these in place and we should roll back this change.
mapman44 (2019-05-10 12:38:10+00:00): Thanks for your message. I am not aware of any buildings being deleted, and certainly that was not my intention. JOSM validation found many duplicate building nodes and that was what should have been deleted. If the changeset caused a problem for you please revert it.
aharvey (2019-05-10 14:12:32+00:00): I checked in more detail and those deleted buildings do appear to be duplicates, so deleting those was a good change. eg. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/615453803 and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/615449961

I still think having bicycle=designated + foot=designated on a highway=cycleway/footway is useful, as it makes it clear that both modes are designated, it's also extra redundancy that if the way is changed from cycleway to footway or vice versa the fact that both modes are designated remains.
realjep (2019-08-04 15:57:31+00:00): Hi, I think the tag you used for board_type does not refer to the type of skateboard.
Proper way to tag a skateshop is shop=sports; sport=skateboard (I don't know how to work with longboards, cruiser etc. thou.
Hjart (2019-05-09 05:10:15+00:00): Undgå helst at røre danske importerede adressenoder. Vores bot (hvis den kommer igang igen) fungerer bedst hvis de lades alene.
Hjart (2019-05-09 05:17:00+00:00): Bemærk også at når der redigeres i DK bør iD startes i DK, da den så automatisk vælger vores nationale SDFE luftfotos
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-09 05:45:59+00:00): OK.  Jeg vidste om botten, og at den kun virker vis adresserne er noder, så jeg har ikke gjort adresser om til områder.  Tak for tippet om SDFE luftfotos!  Jeg havde nogen problemer med at skifte til SDFE halvvejs igennem andresætet.  For en aller anden grund blev laget helt sort når jeg zoomed inde mer an z17 eller 18.
Tak for kommentarerne!
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-09 05:55:20+00:00): Jeg har forresten en spørgsmål: jeg har skiftede nogen af vejene med tagget crossing=zebra om til crossing=marked, of har tilføjet nogen nye med crossing=marked + crossing:signals=yes I stedet for at bruge crossing=traffic_signals. Er det OK, eller skal jeg skifte dem til crossing=zebra & crossing=traffic_signals?
Hjart (2019-05-09 05:56:25+00:00): Jeg har oplevet problemer med SDFE siden i aftes (de loader meget langsomt). Håber det snart løser sig igen.
Jeg holder iøvrigt lige lidt med hvad du laver den første tid ;-), men ellers super du arbejder på området her. Langt hovedparten af de aktive i DK er jyder, så det meste af hovedstadsregionen (-Bornholm + det centrale København) er ret forsømt.
Småbyer som f.eks. Ribe vedligeholdes langt mere aktivt ;-)
Hjart (2019-05-09 06:10:44+00:00): Jeg har ikke umiddelbart en holdning til tagning af fodgængerovergange. Jeg mapper f.eks. aldrig kerbs eller lignende små detaljer. Mit primære virkefelt er mere overordnet + at holde øje med begyndere + udlændinge, hvilket jeg stort set er ene om i DK.
maciek-szn (2019-05-08 19:37:28+00:00): 23 zmiany tego samego w ciągu trzech godzin i dalej rośnie ;-)
Ladung (2019-07-14 11:57:56+00:00): Hi Greg,

how do you know that this river is named Rio Savane and not Rio Maria?

And why are there two villages called "Savane"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2469486758
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6459485481

Greetings
Greg_Rose (2019-07-14 19:03:36+00:00): Greetings!

There are two Savane villages - the first one is at the headwaters of the Rio Savane within Dondo District, the second is at the mouth of the river within the Cidade da Beira boundary.
Rio Savane is somewhat well-known, and is well mapped elsewhere, including on old JOG maps from the 1960's.
On this map (http://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/jog/southern_africa/se-36-16-beira-mozambique.pdf) find -19.75/35.00 (-19º45' lat, 35º00' lon) to see the actual position of Rio Maria. It is a tidal river further to the SW, closer to Beira.

Hope that helps!

Greg
ma-rt-in (2020-06-09 16:08:06+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir sicher, das hier eine Feuerwehr ihren Sitz hat? Laut der VG-Homepage gibt es keine Feuerwehr im Ortsteil Kreuzberg.
vg
AntonSimons (2020-06-10 08:32:04+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in,

bin mir da eigentlich ziemlich sicher. So sieht das Gerätehaus aus: https://www.aw-wiki.de/index.php/Feuerwehrger%C3%A4tehaus_Kreuzberg . Auch auf Google Maps ist es zu erkennen: https://www.google.com/maps/place/50%C2%B030'38.6%22N+6%C2%B058'19.0%22E/@50.5106277,6.9717603,50m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d50.510716!4d6.971938 . Und den Löschgruppenführer kenne ich persönlich: https://www.aw-wiki.de/index.php/Rudolf_P._Schneider

Mit Gruß
ma-rt-in (2020-06-10 09:10:01+00:00): Hallo,
also GoogleMaps ist schon mal keine zulässige Quelle, egal für was.
Aber das aw-wiki sieht schon mal gut aus.
Danke für die Infos.
vg
Phyks (2019-05-10 11:33:49+00:00): Tu as fait un relevé quelconque pour l'alignement de la rue Maurice Arnoux ?

De mon impression sur le terrain, il ne devrait pas y avoir de petit angle au début de la rue Maurice Arnoux section Sud. Toute la rue est en ligne droite.

Je n'ai pas de relevé terrain très précis, donc à confirmer.
messpert (2020-02-03 17:16:00+00:00): I don't think that the solar farm at Mendennick actually exists.

At least I can see no sign on two video surveys driving past on the B3247 yesterday, and I also can't see anything on ESRI imagery.

Should this be a proposed solar farm? I even looked on Bing, an alleged source, and saw nothing.

Should it not be deleted or changed to something like proposed_power?
I could not even see any signs of construction, although I might have missed that.
Russ (2020-02-03 20:26:52+00:00): I can see a solar farm visible in this location on ESRI imagery - I don't tag these things without aerial imagery - and it's also listed here http://www.sig-solar.com/reference/mendennick-solar-farm/

From the drone video on that page it looks like it might be cunningly concealed from the road behind a sizeable hedge?

You're correct that it isn't on Bing - that must have been my mistake in the sources.
Russ (2020-02-03 20:35:27+00:00): (Just FYI it's on ESRI but not ESRI Clarity, for whatever reasons)
messpert (2020-02-03 22:11:26+00:00): I was looking on The Esri (clarity) Beta. But I just checked the ordinary Esri and yes it is there. It didn't occur to me that the "clarity" version could be old. 

As you say, it must be hidden very well by hedges. I have two videos going past in both directions and I looked very carefully. But Cornish hedges tend to be high :-)
bxl-forever (2019-05-12 13:42:44+00:00): Hello,
The street was already properly tagged with "oneway:bicycle=no", which is the recommended solution for SUL/BEV streets.  Most routing algorithms such as OSRM or GraphHopper use this tag.
Adding the cycleway tag does not add anything for routing.  On the contrary, it will spoil other queries. (For instance, counting how many bicycle lanes in Brussels: here there is no lane, just some logos, but the cycleway tag will count this street as one.)
Do you really need the cycleway:* key here?  Am I missing anything?
Kind regards.
rriemann (2019-05-12 23:11:34+00:00): I studied the english osm wikipedia on this for preparation. Following your advice, I remove the cycleway:* key again.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68059293, 68104729, 68105508, 68105633, 68105709, 68105756, 68105794, 68145959, 68146345, 68146553, 68146697, 68146985, 68160864, 68160965, 68161529, 68161721, 68162153, 68162234, 68162279, 68162376, 68162611, 68163568, 68163694, 68163739, 68163838, 68164041, 68164085, 68165740, 68165906, 68165940, 68185910, 68186173, 68186549, 68186818, 68187032, 68187125, 68187226, 68187443, 68187485, 68187666, 68188069, 68188313, 68188419, 68201429, 68201505, 68201819, 68202901, 68203003, 68203435, 68204155, 68209021, 68209301, 68219195, 68219574, 68219739, 68220172, 68220806, 68221103, 68222194, 68222809, 68223067, 68223182, 68223878, 68224030, 68224108, 68224674, 68224917, 68224941, 68225338, 68225802, 68226067, 68226507, 68227031, 68227887, 68229085, 68229569, 68229829, 68230512, 68236789, 68238522, 68239997, 68240230, 68247095, 68247157, 68254338, 68255431, 68256612, 68260729, 68261425, 68262633, 68264209, 68265323, 68266171, 68268335, 68270151, 68270836, 68271582, 68272302, 68274451, 68274945, 68275128, 68275866, 68276159, 68282116, 68283110, 68283717, 68284914, 68286819, 68289047, 68291105, 68294222, 68296422, 68297967, 68298794, 68299585, 68299677, 68301187, 68301547, 68302548, 68304679, 68320691, 68321801, 68324701, 68331931, 68334880, 68335937, 68339550, 68341880, 68347033, 68349262, 68352538, 68355370, 68355422, 68356009, 68356116, 68356294, 68356946, 68364052, 68366235, 68369850, 68371410, 68376470, 68378521, 68378950, 68379651, 68382412, 68383510, 68385700, 68398957, 68399291, 68399782, 68410999, 68415910, 68420221, 68423584, 68424323, 68424816, 68426829, 68429253, 68430393, 68431131, 68435575, 68436037, 68438609, 68440451, 68441506, 68445511, 68449963, 68451718, 68453195, 68453821, 68454265, 68454853, 68456313, 68457805, 68461972, 68461999, 68470135, 68472619, 68473840, 68474670, 68478553, 68479612, 68480583, 68480769, 68481059, 68482276, 68504512, 68508186, 68509217, 68509411, 68511594, 68512732, 68513256, 68522231, 68522792, 68543895, 68590317, 68622884, 68624896, 68625555, 68626317, 68632967, 68637600, 68667338, 68667792, 68671144, 68672198, 68676292, 68677578, 68699310, 68701260, 68701674, 68701804, 68715154, 68715560, 68716454, 68717330, 68726805, 68727988, 68757049, 68760622, 68761787, 68762697, 68790311, 68792530, 68794430, 68795279, 68831135, 68865085, 68865275, 68865601, 68869172, 68870281, 68870622, 68872458, 68872673, 68893573, 68894195, 68895155, 68958266, 68959415, 68966165, 68966428, 68966840, 68967075, 68967170, 68991977, 68995311, 69011097, 69046189, 69140482, 69150153, 69150744, 69170723, 69171419, 69177526, 69178135, 69182449, 69201587, 69203539, 69204391, 69205822, 69242042, 69242271, 69295064, 69296765, 69345956, 69349941, 69358348, 69369923, 69370472, 69372794, 69375281, 69379002, 69382150, 69385738, 69387010, 69395301, 69395710, 69402647, 69406490, 69409242, 69410903, 69416107, 69416729, 69422282, 69422845, 69424353, 69425609, 69427087, 69427817, 69438933, 69442833, 69445192, 69450587, 69452938, 69458491, 69460807, 69464815, 69476830, 69480051, 69501933, 69502957, 69503313, 69759396, 69759457, 69762413, 69841058, 69879265.
Filip009 (2022-04-17 09:33:22+00:00): Dobrý deň, čo symbolizuje to meno cesty? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688730857
Mirecnet (2022-04-17 12:48:24+00:00): Neznamena to nic. Len poznamka, ked este neboli Lidar data.
Opravene na natural=gully
viloan (2019-05-08 19:56:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
frosm (2020-04-18 21:06:45+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6459625082
quel est la source pour sa position ?
je pose cette question parce que la vue satellite monjtre 10 places de parking. hors  Tesla renseigne 10 bornes + ionity qui renseigne 4 bornes.
n'ayant jamais vu d'emplacement partagé, je suppose que les bornes sont de l'autre côté de la route.
François2 (2020-04-21 07:50:53+00:00): la source de cette position est moi même après une visite sur le terrain. De souvenir c'était bien de l'autre coté de la route. Cela me semble correct la.
eggie (2019-05-08 21:28:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

oke.. bedankt voor jje bijdrage. het is wel belangrijk dat je de Kadasterinformatie source=BAG intact laat.
Dit was je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70045268
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-08 21:44:13+00:00): source=BAG hersteld
FuzztheExplorer (2019-05-09 20:05:41+00:00): Excuses voor de beginnersfout, en bedankt voor het pb!
eggie (2019-05-09 20:35:16+00:00): Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. OSM kent wel een erg steile leercurve.
:)
Eggie
FuzztheExplorer (2019-05-09 20:41:57+00:00): "Keep it coming" zou ik zeggen! Geen wonder dat ik me inmeng in aanpassingen voor een openbaar beschikbare kaartweergave, aangezien de concurrentie die benodigde accuratesse zou kunnen gebruiken!
eggie (2019-05-09 20:46:03+00:00): Neus ook eens rond op het forum van OSM
In Wie wat waar zie je wat ieder zo doet. Ook zit daar veel knowhow. Je kunt er ook vragen kwijt. 
Je kunt jezelf daar ook toevoegen Account identiek aan OSM account met wat vertraging in het begin door accountcheck. 
Er zit nog een hele wereld achter OSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
viloan (2019-05-08 20:14:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-05-08 21:36:55+00:00): De twee stukken fietspad zaten niet aan elkaar. Ik heb de stukken nu verbonden. Controleer altijd of er een vebinding is.
MVG,
eggie
FuzztheExplorer (2019-05-09 20:02:32+00:00): Zoals ik het nu voor me zie, klopt het, waarbij de Bakenhofweg een fietspad is, en de dikkere lijn richting noord-oost, een verbindingsweg naar de sportvelden. Zoom ik nu uit, dan komt er een onbekende 'straat' vanaf het uiteinde van de toegangsweg naar het Cruyff Court. Deze weg bestaat niet. Hoe pas ik dit op de juiste wijze aan?
eggie (2019-05-09 20:31:36+00:00): het zal nog de oude rendering zijn van voor je wijzigingen vermoed ik. Dit waren je edits. 
Je hebt die "straat|  verwijderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70045575

De rendering loopt altijd een beetje achter.
De fietslayer meer dan een week.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70045575#map=19/51.96207/5.92579&layers=CN
Gr eggie
FuzztheExplorer (2019-05-09 20:34:58+00:00): Goed om te weten, zeker als je "in den beginne" al je aanpassingen direct toegepast wilt zien ;)
eggie (2019-05-09 20:38:44+00:00): De humanitarian layer werkt momenteel het snelst.
F5 wil ook nog wel eens helpen (cache leegmaken)  of in- en uitzoomen. 

De meester doorgewinterde mappers werken allemaal met editor JOSM. Die heeft een ingebouwde validator.
Die lijkt ingewikkeld, maar dat valt reuze mee. 
Kijk eens naar dit draadje
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2019-05-09 20:40:11+00:00): Zo'n "niet verbonden weg" zie ik onmiddellijk oplichten als ik de validator draai.
eggie (2019-05-08 21:32:46+00:00): Dag Fuzz.. je commentaar "Wijziging" is te vaag. Graag concreet aangeven wat je doet.
Gr eggie.
FuzztheExplorer (2019-05-09 19:58:22+00:00): Sorry, dit was meer een aanvulling. Dit zijn mijn eerste bijdragen, dus ik ben blij met alle aanwijzingen.
Dharma-ae (2019-06-25 13:32:37+00:00): Hello,
You have deleted four public_transport=stop_position points which is wrong, for details on public transport mapping see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport. Please be careful, their deletion disrupts public transport routing.
Best regards, Dharma-ae.
datendelphin (2019-06-30 10:10:37+00:00): What might not be obvious, given this example and the wiki,
those bus stops are mapped in a large level of detail, a bit surprising given the simple situation. One node with the bus_stop or platform is usually sufficient. However, I agree those should not just be deleted, if the information is still up to date. Excessive details are tolerated if not abandoned (out of date).

I just wanted to point out for hb9aof that while those nodes should not be deleted, ther is no need to copy the complexity to other bus stops.
hb9aof (2019-07-02 12:45:01+00:00): Sorry gentlemen, I have NEVER deleted any bus stop... The 6 bus stops in Sezenove are perfectly precise and there is no need to modify neither their position, nor their names. What about a strange story !
Dharma-ae (2019-07-05 02:56:01+00:00): Hello, hb9aof.

You have deleted nodes 1288266979, 6403330893, 59974432 and 6403320759 which were tagged with public_transport=	stop_position and were included to route of Bus 47 (relations 1902194 and 9483613) without replacing them with any equivalent. The Public Transport Version 2 defines public_transport=stop_position as "the place where the vehicle usually stops on the rails or on the street." and public_transport=platform as "the place where passengers are waiting for the vehicles." so they have different meaning and the nodes with both tags should be present (as different nodes or, at least, as a same node with both tags) in each stop.

Can you also tell me what is source of node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6459748645 tagged with natural=peak and name=HB9AOF which has a strange name looking more like a ref or id but not a name.

Best regards, Dharma-ae.
hb9aof (2019-07-05 06:30:00+00:00): Please stop to send me accusing mails, I have NEVER deleted these bus stops, they are perfectly correct on the map. The point HB9AOF is the precise position of this radio station and its identification callsign. I don't see any problem or mistake.
datendelphin (2019-07-06 08:53:23+00:00): Hi hb9aof.  Our comments were not meant accusatory, sorry that it sounded like that. It is normal and acceptable to do some mistakes when starting to map.  

I believe that you have not deleted those nodes on purpose. But they were deleted by you. Please go to the changeset you created: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70046391 and you will see those four numbers below "Nodes", stricken through, which means they were deleted. You can also click on the nodes and click on history there to see that those four nodes were previously tagged with public_transport=stop_position 

Also, what I believe is your ham radio station, is not a mountain peak. You should tag it as man_made=mast or something similar.
surveyor54 (2019-05-09 06:58:49+00:00): Hallo,
das Gebäude markieren und die Taste S drücken macht das Gebäude rechtwinklig.

Gruß
surveyor54
trigpoint (2019-05-09 08:40:07+00:00): Hi, I have been here and there are definitely no signs. If I have missied something then please point me to some photographic evidence.
In OSM we map what is visible and verifiable on the ground and I am convinced that this does not pass that test.
Cheers Phil
yumean1119 (2019-05-08 20:48:55+00:00): 2019/05/09現在、tollタグを詳細化する議論が行われているので、これに倣いました。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toll
yumean1119 (2019-10-23 03:11:06+00:00): Osmoseでエラーが発生してしまうようなので、変更セット: 76075883で標準タグのtoll=yesに変更しました。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76075883
gileri (2019-07-05 17:53:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag "recycling:glass" signifie le recyclage de tout verre. Pour les conteneurs alimentaires c'est plutôt "recycling:glass_bottles" qu'il faut utiliser
eggie (2019-05-08 21:47:35+00:00): merged info with addressnode
Bandi_ (2019-05-19 17:20:11+00:00): Hello!
I highly disagree with this name change. This was the official Hungarian name before 1920. Like Alsólendva isn't Alsólendva anymore, just Lendva.
Check streetview please:
https://www.google.hu/maps/@46.8218966,16.3307199,3a,75y,289.08h,89.94t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sG0TPq6oTvrbEVrCsNRN-aA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Train station:
https://www.google.hu/maps/@46.8204845,16.3301489,3a,75y,233.2h,87.41t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssjfFs8oZxLLdP6zIayB7dw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

It should remain Hodoš / Hodos as this is what you see on the field!
StefanB (2019-05-19 18:09:02+00:00): Yes, the official names as on the signs should be used, but previous names are welcome to be entered into the old_name and/or old_name:hu tags.
StefanB (2019-05-19 18:11:04+00:00): If that name is not fully obsolete, but still actively used in Hungary it should be entered in the alt_name:hu tag
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-09 07:18:54+00:00): Hi imflynn13, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70047453

#GolfMapping 
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
eggie (2019-05-08 21:50:40+00:00): Hoi.. Svp niet met de kaart schuiven in de editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen. Editing en schuiven gaat immers met de linkermuisknop.
MVG,
Eggie
viloan (2019-05-08 21:22:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-05-09 17:34:17+00:00): Hallo! Bitte kontrolliere mal denKnoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5139522754: Hast Du Dich beim Schlüssel leyel eventuell vertippt und Du meinst level?
BImoBielJH (2019-05-10 08:58:55+00:00): stimmt danke :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.