piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Woazboat (2026-07-22 11:15:43+00:00): Lieber manchmal falsch als gar nicht ^^
Ich sollte mir nur vorerst abgewöhnen die Tags in Anführungszeichen zu setzen, dann würden die Links auch passen

lg
muralito (2021-09-25 03:49:10+00:00): Waze no permite copiar la informacion. Por favor, respeta las reglas que aceptaste al unirte como colaborador de OSM. Mantener el mapa libre de basura propietaria es una prioridad.
nw520 (2021-08-31 18:34:37+00:00): Erneut, temporäre Veranstaltungen haben nichts in OpenStreetMap zu suchen. Bitte sehe von solchen "Beiträgen" ab.
user_5359 (2021-08-31 09:01:37+00:00): Hello! You import different GPX trace, but you forgot the OSM keys for this ways. Please correct this.
DENelson83 (2021-08-31 00:26:06+00:00): How can we tell if these are federal vs. provincial/territorial electoral districts?  Can you put an additional tag in to distinguish the two?
DannyMcD (2021-08-31 13:47:15+00:00): If I were adding provincial electoral districts, I would use a tag like political_division=prov_const to distinguish them from the federal ones.  As far as I know, no provincial ones have been added yet.  If someone does add provincial electoral districts, they'll have to think about the best way to distinguish the two types.
Bexhill-OSM (2021-08-30 23:15:51+00:00): The wiki says to put maxheight on ways after a height_restrictor.  Although the way isn't restricted as after you leave the barrier, it might make the restriction more obvious when routing?  What do you think?
Nathan_A_RF (2021-08-31 10:33:38+00:00): Given the drive-throughs are one way it makes more sense to sign the restrictions as they are; the barrier and low roof
mueschel (2021-09-02 09:02:28+00:00): Hi,
please check the 'DANE' tags on the objects you added recently. There are several different spellings like 'DANE' and 'Dane'. There should only be one spelling - OSM is case sensitive.
user_14017757 (2021-08-30 23:19:30+00:00): Czemu złą nazwę ulicy nadajesz? To nie jest ulica 30 sierpnia 2021.
syntex (2021-08-30 23:43:13+00:00): Racja, już poprawione
user_14017757 (2021-08-31 00:49:15+00:00): Ludzie co z wami? Ta ulica się tak nie nazywa...
maraf24 (2021-08-30 21:46:51+00:00): Kancelaria to biuro, a nie miejsce odbywania praktyk religijnych :)
ZiemniakLBN2 (2021-08-30 21:56:03+00:00): Mały błąd, już poprawione :)
emvee (2021-09-05 09:16:26+00:00): In this changeset you added barrier=lift_gate to the Boompje before the Nieuwe Leuvebrug.

That can be problematic for routers, so I added access=yes, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110740903

Greetings!
Kalepom (2021-09-17 15:39:17+00:00): Oh, great. I wasn't aware such a point without an access tag could affect routers. Thanks for your vigilance and for correcting it :)
Jmapper007 (2021-08-30 21:55:45+00:00): Next time can you make these two separate changesets instead of having it cover half the world? -Jmapper007
Grid Marketing (2021-08-30 22:18:21+00:00): Jmapper007 - yes, sorry. My mistake.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-08-31 09:20:21+00:00): Moin sundew,

danke für Deine Änderungen! Bei den beiden DHL Packstationen ändere ich das type=Schrank in type=cabinet (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Packstation).

Gruß Roger Wilco
sundew (2021-09-03 15:51:06+00:00): Hallo Roger,

danke für die netten Worte. Leider kann ich dir da nicht zustimmen, was das von dir erwähnte Tag type betrifft. Es mag ja so sein, dass jetzt (!) auf der Wikiseite ein anderes Tag steht (wenn auch etwas unglücklich formuliert). Allerdings war das nicht immer so und type=Schrank ist die seit ewig benutzte Variante, wenn auch unglücklicherweise nicht-englisch, weil ursprünglich nur hierzulande verwendet. 
Sie wird nachwievor überwiegend benutzt. Irgendwann hat eine der überflüssigen Mapping-Apps angefangen, eigene englische Tags zu erfinden, und jemand hat das undiskutiert (!) auf der Wikiseite geändert - ebenso ohne an die Folgen zu denken. 
Und nun haben wir jetzt den Salat, dass nachwievor tausende Packstationen deutschlandweit mit type=Schrank besetzt sind und nur vielleicht 15% (Stand Juli) mit der englischsprachigen Variante. Zwei Werte für ein und dasselbe, das sollte definitiv nicht so sein. 
Ein Massenedit um das glattzuziehen, ist normalerweise unzulässig, obwohl das vor etwa zwei Jahren auch mit den https vs. http-Adressen bei website=* gemacht wurde.
Zudem müsste jede Packstation vorher mindestens auf Fortexistenz und Stellort vor Ort geprüft werden, denn andere Quellen sind unzulässig. Eine flächendeckende Mapperaktion, quasi als "Wochenaufgabe", würde auch nur in Großstädten halbwegs funktionieren und bestenfalls das Verhältnis der beiden Varianten verschieben, nicht jedoch das Problem lösen. 
Falls es eine solche klassische Aktion gibt, die bundesweit wirklich ALLE Stationen korrigiert, würde ich mich hier natürlich daran beteiligen, aber sowas ist nicht in Sicht. Akteure bitte voran!
In einer Diskussion zum Thema beim monatlichen Hamburger Mappertreffen (derzeit virtuell) haben wir dort beschlossen, diese Umtaggung derzeit(!) NICHT zu unterstützen und die bisherigen meistgenutzten Varianten (type=Schrank bzw. type=Paketbox) weiter zu nutzen! Und da ich auf meinen Biketouren Hamburg plus 100km Umkreis abfahre, halte ich mich vorerst daran.

LG,
sundew
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-05 07:26:32+00:00): Moin sundew,

ah! Danke für die Aufklärung, das wusste ich nicht. Ich habe mich nun auch etwas informiert. Weder der Wert "Schrank" noch die Verwendung von type ist meiner Meinung nach nicht gut. Es gibt den Vorschlag model=* zu stattdessen zu verwenden. Das halte ich für sinnvoll und habe das im OSM-Forum angesprochen:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68017

Gruß Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-05 07:27:52+00:00): (Au Backe, wenn man Formulierungen zu oft ändert...)
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-08 07:47:54+00:00): Moin sundew,
ich habe type wieder zurück zu type=Schrank geändert und die Werte auch im Wiki dokumentiert.
Viele Grüße
sundew (2021-09-08 21:36:06+00:00): Hallo Roger,
danke für die Information.
LG
sundew
Mordechai23 (2021-08-31 11:39:38+00:00): Cześć, witamy w OSM ;) Widzę, że podczas edycji połączyłeś/aś węzły poligonu lasu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174542792
z węzłami sąsiadującej drogi. Raczej odradzam robienia czegoś takiego, bo edytowanie potem takich "sklejonych" poligonów z drogami jest niepotrzebnie żmudne i upierdliwe.

Jeśli masz jakieś pytania lub chcesz się czegoś dowiedzieć to zapraszam do pisania wiadomosci prywatnych lub do reszty spoleczności OSM na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 lub discordzie https://discord.gg/YFBhFE9w - na pewno ktoś pomoże ;)
syntex (2021-08-30 23:01:39+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-03 06:57:37+00:00): Why you deleted several objects without any explanation?
Cartographos (2021-09-03 08:49:57+00:00): Hello,
I am redrawing those objects as we speak. I am planning on making the building into 3D and the garden & sidewalk areas were making it really complicated. Everything will be added back really soon.
Zaneo (2021-08-31 07:09:02+00:00): Do you have a comment to go with this? It would really help my understanding.
ManelG (2021-09-01 09:24:47+00:00): It was a mistake. I reverted the changeset. Thanks for the warning.
abakus_uploader (2021-08-31 22:32:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
joel56dt (2021-08-30 23:29:58+00:00): 👍 It may be worth separating the name= into name:en= and name:zh=

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
Fleezing (2021-08-30 23:59:22+00:00): Thanks—I'll do that.
literan (2022-06-02 07:04:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. 
Подскажите, а откуда информация по строительству (и названиям) улиц https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977994025 и соседним, которые вы нанесли?
adrianojbr (2021-08-31 01:25:12+00:00): Olá,  SirRoma. Se o acesso é privado, mas as trilhas existem, o correto é adicionar restrição de acesso (access=private) em vez de apagar. Além disso, podem ser mapeados portões (barrier=gate), por exemplo. Se você quiser, eu posso reverter as alterações, para que você possa complementar as informações de acesso às trilhas. Abraço.
SirRoma (2021-08-31 12:10:46+00:00): Bom dia Adriano. Fora solicitado pelos proprietários da terra a retirada das trilhas do mapa do osm, visto que não estavam sendo respeitados os avisos de restrição.
adrianojbr (2021-08-31 12:39:55+00:00): Nesse caso, concordo com a remoção das trilhas do mapa. Abraço.
SekeRob (2021-08-31 15:00:41+00:00): Hi,

Very curious, all these buildings disappearing. Did they fail some standard of someone or was it the 2009 earthquake that flattened them ;?
Fra00 (2021-08-31 15:25:01+00:00): They failed reality, since who traced them just invented their shapes and position. But don't worry, as you can see I am actively working on the area, there are soon going to be buildings that actually exist.
SekeRob (2021-09-01 07:23:08+00:00): That was blatantly obvious from your always clear, complete and meaningful change set commentary... let the (re)viewers guess WIH (What in heavens) you're doing and why. 2 OSM wiki's spring to mind 1) good CS commentaries. 2) Change history.   The 'whoever' is easy discovered.

cheers
Fra00 (2021-09-01 07:37:27+00:00): Since my change sets are always about an extended number of modifications (in this case, I completely mapped a village that had only three nameless main streets before) it is difficult to describe every single passage in che commentary (for example, my changes are much bigger than "Add grassy park with benches and trees."). But you're always welcome to control everything I do. Regarding the reason of my modifications (the "why" in your comment), I edit these maps so that the villages in this area can really appear on OSM map: without my edits of the last years, none of these places would be mapped.
I said "whoever" because it is not important at all who mapped those buildings in the first place: they had, as I said, completely wrong shapes and locations, and thus had to be remapped. I am here on OSM since many years, I know what change history is :)
Have a nice day.
SekeRob (2021-09-01 07:53:26+00:00): Clearly you're above it, beyond correction. But still you should be detailing the important pieces, like deleting a few dozen buildings. The 'whoever' won't be happy.
Fra00 (2021-09-01 08:02:24+00:00): Sorry, I thought OSM was about giving good maps to the users, not making other editors happy. I obviously apologise if I offended someone's sensibility.
SekeRob (2021-09-01 08:14:44+00:00): God maps WITH preserving history and if it cant be, note why, WITH meaningful commentaries on all sets.
Fra00 (2021-09-01 08:18:05+00:00): Of course, as you say.
SekeRob (2021-09-01 08:25:01+00:00): --//--
Fra00 (2021-09-01 08:26:57+00:00): I don't really know what this means.
Dawid2849 (2021-08-31 09:38:49+00:00): Ładny landuse :)
Ben Dezar 2 (2021-09-08 19:36:27+00:00): Dziękuje
marczoutendijk (2022-04-26 18:36:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5730294740
Is there a meaning behind leisure=*
rozwellUK (2022-04-27 09:12:23+00:00): Yes, but thinking about it, club=sailing is a better fit, so I've updated it.
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:52:26+00:00): Thank You.
mueschel (2021-09-06 10:06:01+00:00): You added a strange 'Penha' tag to several roads, could you check that?
CapAhab (2021-09-07 15:13:32+00:00): Thanks for noticing this, I corrected the tag and updated the destination as seen in Mapillary
PolyDunami (2021-08-30 23:38:21+00:00): The first part of this changeset was to correct tags for power poles. I first started mapping them when I discovered that several power poles had attached street lamps and so I tagged them as utilities instead. Recently, I found out that there was no proper rendering for utility poles and so I started fixing those tags up.
PolyDunami (2021-08-30 23:41:26+00:00): The second part of this changeset involves a large amount of upgraded tags, and I believe that this needs more attention specifically because the tags that need upgrading are linked into large networks. These include transit and power systems.
skorasaurus (2021-11-05 21:47:47+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for editing. 

Is it still an open pub under a different name? 

If the business closed, then you can delete the pub tag from the point but don't delete the point, the address is still useful information and should be kept. :)
JaniceG (2021-11-19 01:51:54+00:00): It's under renovation right now - walked by yesterday. It will reopen in the spring semester as the university bookstore, moving there from across the street. I've updated the title to reflect that, but if you know another method to be more compliant, feel free to edit!
skorasaurus (2021-11-19 17:13:21+00:00): Thanks for the response. Ideally, we map what is there right now, and the bookstore tag would imply the bookstore is already open there so removed the bookstore tag but I added an additional tag (description) to provide additional information (like that it's a future bookstore) that's not really captured by any other tag. Tthe name tag is also suitable for this for adding extra information that's not quite applicable for a particular area. 

Thanks again for all of your edits in and around the CWRU campus! I was there a couple weeks ago and was able to use OSM to navigate/browse around. :)
JaniceG (2021-11-19 18:04:16+00:00): Thanks for the corrections!!
Allison P (2022-03-30 17:35:29+00:00): Brand tags should not be on building parts. Please, remove your tag additions to parts of Gaylord Rockies.
olo81 (2024-01-14 19:30:50+00:00): Nazwa opisowa do poprawy 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144468997
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
olo81 (2024-01-14 19:31:53+00:00): To też https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144545673
tguen (2021-08-31 07:06:35+00:00): How are you merging the addresses with buildings? How are you dealing with conflation? Does this import have a wiki page?
tguen (2021-08-31 07:33:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978003490 appears to be the wrong building to attach the address to.
hoserab (2021-08-31 00:46:13+00:00): *24 Ave
Frans S (2021-08-31 10:28:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings you map.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110484566
Frans S (2021-09-02 09:59:09+00:00): Send a PM to the project manager to check this mappings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110484656
ElliottPlack (2021-09-15 01:40:38+00:00): hey DUGA, traffic_signals=traffic_lights is not a known value for traffic lights. Use traffic_signals=signal per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals

I will update https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/102880848
DUGA (2021-09-15 14:32:11+00:00): This is really weird.

I've tagged like this for hundreds of times as it is shown in the iD "Type" dropdown.
DUGA (2021-09-15 14:34:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals
DUGA (2021-09-15 14:35:41+00:00): "traffic_signals=signal" is a vague term as it does not clearly define what kind of "signal" it is.
ElliottPlack (2021-09-15 16:18:59+00:00): Yes, the wiki mentions that if it is a specialized signal, you should use one of the other terms. But the default is =signal
ElliottPlack (2021-09-15 16:19:36+00:00): Ah, perhaps ID doesn't match the wiki. Good pickup then.
ElliottPlack (2021-09-15 16:25:48+00:00): I updated the wiki just now, but I think it will be up for discussion. You can keep using it though https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals
DUGA (2021-09-16 16:51:58+00:00): Yes.

Feel free to CC me in any relevant discussions.
Nathan_A_RF (2021-08-31 15:14:16+00:00): I would suggest not tagging the roads inside the car parks as having height limits. The height restrictor itself provides the height limit, and it can be removed in certain circumstances.
Frans S (2021-09-02 09:57:33+00:00): Send a PM to the project manager to check this mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110484923
Frans S (2021-08-31 10:27:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
just a remark. When the building you map crosses a border of a residential area, please move the line of the residential area to outside the building
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485320
Alice Liv Chan (2021-09-01 04:39:25+00:00): Hi Frans S
Thank you for the helpful and constructive feedback.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485320
TomPar (2021-11-22 02:06:42+00:00): Hello.  I noticed you've been converting "tracks" to "paths" in a few locations.  Have you familiarized yourself with the OSM track wiki page before doing this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Being part of the "Belmont Street listing" is not a necessary criteria for a way to qualify as a "track".

Like many things in OSM, there is a lot of room for interpretation.  For me what makes it a track is:

- it is very wide
- 4WD vehicles could traverse it now (and definitely have in the past)
- there is a wide "vehicle style" swing gate near the intersection with Pleasant  St which suggests occasional truck access by the town for maintenance of fire protection.  Else, much cheaper large stones could have been placed to prevent vehicle access.

Please review the wiki and let me know if your mind has changed.  Thanks.
MechanicalTim (2021-11-22 21:46:15+00:00): As a relatively new OSM editor, I appreciate the thoughtful comment, and the pointer to the wiki, which enlightened me on some of the nuances. I ran the paths/tracks at the time of my edit, and my perception was "this looks like it *used* to be an active track, but has developed in a way that suggests it almost certainly is not any more". I was influenced by the fact that these sections are (or will be?) part of the Western Greenway, which I took to be intended for hikers and bicyclists. To my eye, it was definitely not as wide and cleared as, e.g., the most track-like picture in the wiki. But your points are well taken, and I think it's an edge case. As such, I don't feel compelled to change it back to track, but also do not object to your doing so. I won't get in an "edit war" with you over it! I bow to your greater experience/judgement.
TomPar (2021-11-24 03:56:55+00:00): Thanks for the response.

Yeah, if you get into OSM more, you'll be amazed at the level of back-and-forth there are on these types of things.  It's hard e
TomPar (2021-11-24 04:05:11+00:00): opps.  Hit enter too quick.

...it's hard enough getting agreement on these things locally.  You should see some of the discussions with mappers globally!  I'm amazed OSM has gotten as far as it has.

Anyways, thanks for the acquiescence.  I do feel "track" is more consistent with other similar wide paths regionally so changed it.

For me: "wide enough for 4WD truck" and "purposefully intended vehicle access from regular roads (via those swing gates)" are the two qualifying criteria consistent with the wiki.

BTW, I'm active on the OSM Slack instance.   Always happy to meet and collaborate with other local mappers...especially those interested in adding details to our public lands.  Cheers.

https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
SirRoma (2021-08-31 12:16:03+00:00): Fora solicitado pelos proprietários das terras a retirada das trilhas do osm, justificada pelo acesso que a informação proporciona ao público. 
Diversos casos de invasão de propriedade privada já foram registrados e estão tentando inibir tais.
Frans S (2021-09-02 09:57:17+00:00): Send a PM to the project manager to check this mappings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485501
Frans S (2021-08-31 10:22:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485543
Frans S (2021-09-01 14:14:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
I have my doubts if the big building on top is realy a building. To little shadow. I leave it to the validator to decide on that.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485599
Frans S (2021-09-02 09:57:04+00:00): Send a PM to the project manager to check this mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110485692
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-31 03:10:43+00:00): Hiya!

Is this a little free library sort of feature, similar to those featured on this website: https://littlefreelibrary.org/ ?

If so, the tag amenity=public_bookcase may be a better fit than leisure=park.
Kevo (2021-09-10 20:30:02+00:00): Traffic lights should not be added where there are no actual traffic lights that exist.
Adamant1 (2021-09-04 09:50:02+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you removed the landuse=residental tag from a bunch of areas. You probably should have left them. Since it's if they co-exist with the place tag. Something can be both a residential area and a neighborhood. So, I'd appreciate it if you re-added landuse=residential to the areas that you removed it from. Thanks.
Baloo Uriza (2021-09-04 16:48:30+00:00): Problem is there's a lot in the middle that isn't actually residential.  Landuses should be congruent with the actual landuse, not entire districts.