piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmviborg (2020-10-21 19:38:42+00:00): Please don't move address tags to polygons, don't touch the address nodes. In DK use SDFE aerial imagery, Esri and others is out of date.
Frans S (2020-11-18 10:01:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
A remark.
Please tag each building with building=yes
Also square each rectangular building with the Q key
See also my PM to you
Best regards
aweech (2020-10-22 14:19:44+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just so you know, a stream in OSM is defined as a linear waterway that an active, able-bodied person could jump across. I went ahead and changed this way back to a stream. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream for more information. Happy Mapping!
ququruzka (2020-11-09 09:54:16+00:00): поверніть будь-ласка старі назви вулиць (українські назви).
Webqa (2020-11-14 10:04:27+00:00): Тут вообще не было никаких названий улиц, так что возвращать нечего. Но не переживайте "українські назви" указал в locale
lm@Door2Peak (2021-06-24 09:44:07+00:00): Hoi Hecktor,
beachte, dass wenn du ganze Routen am Stück mapst und diesen den maximalen Schwierigkeitsgrad zuteilst gewisse Wege rot-weiss belegt werden, die im wahren Leben aber gelb markiert  sind. Es wäre darum wohl sauberer, du würdest zuerst ein Wanderweg-Netz aus Knoten zu Knoten Relationen aufbauen und dort die richtige Klassierung/Markierung zuteilen und erst im zweiten Schritt dann deine Routen als Superrelationen zusammensetzen.

Oder?

Beste Grüsse,
lm@Door2Peak
hecktor (2021-06-25 07:05:28+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast da eigentlich recht. Erinnere mich soweit dass ich an der Route, da schon Existent, einfach weiter dazugefügt habe.
Kann man denn Relationen und Wege gemischt in eine Route packen? So habe ich dich verstanden 
Grüsse
Hecktor
yy_lin_hao (2020-10-21 20:02:08+00:00): #msftgive2020
DUGA (2021-03-29 14:27:29+00:00): Are these abandoned:railway=rail still there?

I don't think so...
bhietsch (2021-03-29 15:06:24+00:00): It really depends on your definition of abandoned:railway=rail. I know there are some people who are very passionate about keeping them if there's the slightest indication on the ground that there was once a rail. I have not surveyed Enola yard apart from looking at it while driving over the I81, but it was obvious from aerial imagery that some of the TIGER rails were no longer existent. So without a formal ground survey, and  with recent imagery that didn't show any kind of major development over that section of the yard, I added the abandoned prefix. I don't think there's much value in removing them, but I'm also not adamantly opposed.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-24 00:53:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. If something doesn't have a name, it's better to omit the name tag. If there is a sign that says "Unnamed" or it is labeled that on a map, then you did the right thing. there is also the "noname=yes" tag to indicate that something doesn't have a name. Please ask if you have questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92852690
tastrax (2020-10-25 00:18:35+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
muralito (2020-10-23 02:02:43+00:00): Why the f did you this!!!!!

You should not do changes based on imagery that is older than the changes!!!!
yjn3n (2020-10-23 03:36:49+00:00): I have reverted these roads back to their previous state. Thank you for the advice. I will keep this in mind going forward.
IlBano (2021-04-24 16:58:14+00:00): Ciao.
In questo changeset una parte della SP313 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574477480) è stata marcata come un senso unico che di fatto inibisce l'accesso a Castelletto Cervo. Forse il senso unico termina all'incrocio con la strada per il cimitero ?

Grazie

IlBano
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Pooh01 (2023-08-29 07:47:55+00:00): Czy dodane punkty to rzeczywiście mieszkania na wynajem (nie mogę znaleźć w necie żadnych ofert) czy nieprawidłowo zaznaczone budynki / adresy?
Jeśli te dwa punkty to dwa apartamenty na wynajem, trzeba by dodać informacje kontaktowe. Jeśli nie, punkty trzeba by usunąć.
VA00 (2021-01-29 18:15:31+00:00): Jakim cudem track może być równocześnie grade1 i horrible? Schody jakieś betonowe?
VA00 (2021-06-13 19:34:27+00:00): Ścieżka wąska na szerokość kierownicy, zarośnięta.
Warin61 (2020-10-27 05:32:37+00:00): Hi,
the way 52349183 that you deleted is part of the relation for a retail area... 
part reversion of this changeset to restore it.
richard_ap (2020-10-28 07:24:53+00:00): thanks!
porfiriopaiz (2020-10-22 01:50:30+00:00): Hola Samuel.

Te solicito amablemente que por favor evites cambiar el nombre de las paradas de buses.

Aún estamos mejorando los datos de transporte público en Managua y otros departamentos del país.

Necesitamos que los datos _no sean_ modificados.

Existen muchas otras formas en las que puedes contribuir con OSM, por favor consideralo.
DUGA (2021-04-03 03:37:11+00:00): I'm seriously asking what is your source of marking this road as unpaved?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12018364/history
Glassman (2020-10-22 12:39:17+00:00): Tip: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92857567
NickMillerUK (2020-10-21 23:24:07+00:00): Incorrect comment, somehow auto-populated with a comment from another previous commit.
ajf3934221 (2020-10-22 09:13:38+00:00): Hi, klasse viele neue Details!
Bei der Topologie des Wegverlaufs unterhalb von Knoten 8034194345 bin ich mir jedoch nicht so sicher. Ein Vergleich mit Mapbox, Maxar, sowie gps-tarces spricht eher für die vorherige Version. Evtl. würde ich bei Gelegenheit gps Spur zum Abgleich aufzeichnen. 

Grüße, Andy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92857614
seichter (2020-10-22 21:40:40+00:00): Ich habe einen GPS-Track gemittelt aus 6 Geräten hochgeladen. Ich habe den Wegweiser eingetragen, am Weg (blauer Balken) habe ich nichts geändert, zumindest sehe ich in der History nichts.
In den Bildern sehe ich nur inMapbox (und etwas schärfer in ESRI) ein Stück des Weges. Den Bildern ist aber insbesondere an Abhängen nicht zu trauen, da kommt es wegen der Ungenauigkeiten im Höhenmodell gerne zu Verzerrungen.
seichter (2020-10-22 22:05:35+00:00): Kommando zurück: Da ich am Tagging des Weges nichts geändert habe, tauche ich dort nicht auf, wohl aber an den Nodes.
Die habe ich bis zu 6 m in Richtung meines Tracks verschoben. Die Wege in Maps4BW sind (anders als die Gebäude) nicht aus den Katasterdaten und  erfahrungsgemäß etwas ungenauer.
Wegen der geringen Abweichung würde ich aber nicht auf meiner Version bestehen. Da bin ich leidenschaftslos.
ajf3934221 (2020-10-23 14:29:38+00:00): Moin! Den von Dir genannten Punkten bezüglich der Genauigkeit der Sat-Bilder stimme ich voll und ganz zu.  Sehr interessant finde ich Deine Technik die Aufzeichnung zu mitteln. Und überhaupt auch aufwändig - mit sechs Geräten gleichzeitig aufzuzeichnen. 
Verwendest Du eine Software um die Tracks zu mitteln?
seichter (2020-10-23 17:49:10+00:00): Ja, denn ich mittle über die gleichzeitig aufgenommenen Trackpunkte. Musste ich selber schreiben, denn so was habe ich noch nirgends gesehen.
ajf3934221 (2020-10-25 11:52:25+00:00): Interessante Technik! Bei interesse kannst Du ja mal diesen Weg hier nachmessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355240430 mich würde interessieren was Du dabei herausbekommst. Hier dürften die GPS Bedingungen wesentlich besser sein als in der Hanglage. Zufällig habe ich dabei einen Trigonometrischen Punkt gefunden und diesen auch eingemesssen. Kannst ja mal vergleichen ... Grüße!
Gazer75 (2020-10-22 02:10:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please do not modify the address nodes in OSM for Norway. They are added and maintained via official cadastre database. Make a new point with the data for shops.
Antonio Giacomini (2020-10-21 23:34:48+00:00): chiedo a voi revisori come fare* (mi è stata tagliata quest'ultima parte dal commento)
Cascafico (2020-10-22 07:29:10+00:00): Ciao,
credo che siano dei "warning" non propriamente errori: come ha scritto, se non c'è connessione non mettiamola, così magari un giorno gli amministratori si accorgeranno che non c'è navigabilità, sopratutto per disabili.

Comunque non duplicherei i nomi delle strade anche sui relativi marciapiedi e ciclabili.
Cascafico (2020-10-22 07:37:39+00:00): ...se invece quando il marciapiede finisce e puoi accedere al piano stradale semplicemente scendendo dal cordolo, connetti pure la footway alla highway, ma inserisci un nodo kerb=raised (il cordolo) NON nel punto di giunzione con la strada, ma sulla footway in corrispondenza del bordo stradale. Ciò informerà i navigatori che se impostati su sedia a rotelle, non tracceranno la rotta per quel marciapiede.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-21 23:53:13+00:00): Hi, I unglued the landuse=residential from the road in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92857936
poiki (2020-10-23 00:53:02+00:00): OK thanks.
porfiriopaiz (2020-10-22 01:44:17+00:00): Hola Samuel, te solicito nuevamente que por favor no cambies los nombres de las paradas de buses.

Evitamos usar nombres extensos en las paradas de buses que pueden generar redundancia con algún otro punto de interés.

Por favor no insistas, hay muchas otras formas de contribuir con OSM que van más allá de renombrar las paradas de buses que ya están muy bien establecidas.
VLD159 (2021-03-04 18:22:20+00:00): Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I saw a road that intersects your water polygon, Way 862363088, on the Western portion of the feature, and it also doesn’t match with Bing aerial imagery. When you compiled your GPX data, was this area under water?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony
abakus_uploader (2020-10-22 22:30:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
porfiriopaiz (2020-10-22 01:40:20+00:00): Hola Samuel.

Te voy a pedir encarecidamente que no edites los nombres de las paradas.

Aún no terminamos de editar la información relacionada con Transporte público de Manangua.

Existen muchas otras formas de contribuir en OSM que van más allá de renombrar los nombres de las paradas de buses.
Samuel Chávez (2020-10-22 02:01:59+00:00): 
Lo lament
Lo lamento pero yo cree zonas de parada para esas rutas en Esquipulas porque pensé que se había terminado de completar la ruta ya que en esta web: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nicaragua/Transporte_p%C3%BAblico/Managua se refleja que ya estaban completas. Yo pensé que se les había olvidado esas crear zonas de parada y bueno creí que estaba haciendo algo bueno. Lo lamento.
user_8466505 (2020-10-22 05:26:48+00:00): Why did you leave the reference number on the fire station? In my opinion, that is like saying “Safeway #3794”.
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-24 00:00:33+00:00): Most fire stations have a reference number assigned either by the department itself or by a larger district or county. I think it’s entirely appropriate to use ref=* for that reference number.

Or are you commenting on the inclusion of the number in the name? I didn’t add that. It came from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3040281233/history and I just converted it to an area.

Anyhow, I disagree that a store receipt name is equivalent. People don’t refer to stores by number in normal conversation, but they often do for fire stations, especially in technical contexts. In this case, the sign just says the fire department’s name, but I’ve mapped many fire stations that have the station name on the sign, including the number.
treestryder (2020-12-23 22:05:04+00:00): Usually, we try to make our change sets more succinct. Here I would like to talk about the footpath added to Holmes Road in Lansing (thanks for that), but this change set spans to include Sault Saint Marie. 

When adding footways, there is no need to separately "draw" the crosswalk. Just mark the junction between the roadway and the footway as the appropriate crossing type. It makes things cleaner and much easier to deal with. I've been find this through out Lansing, when using StreetComplete to add surface types (which nearly always changes in a crossing), lighting, and the various crossing details it can add.
IanH (2020-12-24 06:14:42+00:00): Sorry, didn't realize the changeset was so large. I try to keep them under 150 edits (ID) and a bbox of a couple miles , not the size of the state. 
I do intentionally map the actual crosswalk because it allow me to quickly add tactile pad information at either end when available.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92860471
treestryder (2020-12-29 18:02:06+00:00): Carry on then.

Thanks again for your help with the Lansing area.

Check the Lansing and Michigan Wiki pages. Michigan mappers have started to meet each month.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-24 01:25:26+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OSM. The website tags you've been putting on cemeteries aren't "wrong", but they don't seem to be in the spirit of the tag. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website "... the full URL to the official website" and official is bolded, meaning a site created my the people who operate the property. Maybe this the official website, but if I had to guess, I'd say it's not.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92860624
steve31266 (2020-10-24 05:06:31+00:00): Agreed. This cemetery itself does not have an official website, nor does the City of Ashland mention its cemetery on its website. I simply wanted to point to a credible source.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-24 10:24:05+00:00): Consider using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
which normally goes on the changeset (not on an element).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Mazda05 (2020-10-23 21:58:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Классификация_дорог_(голосование)
ThamesEstuary (2020-10-26 22:18:33+00:00): Hi Mazda05, Thanks for making these changes and sharing the Russia wiki guideline, I’ll make sure to keep that in mind going forward.
user_5359 (2020-10-22 04:09:43+00:00): typo: der Bahnhof heißt Landau
PlaneMad (2020-10-29 16:12:51+00:00): Keep up the amazing mapping work around Tamil Nadu!

With names, the accepted convention from past discussion is to keep the `name` tag in latin characters for data consistency.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages for some background.

Is there any specific reason for switching the name tags to Tamil script?
Ti_Ru (2020-10-29 16:37:18+00:00): Yes there is a big reason.

I don't understand this convention. In North African countries Arabic and Tamazight scripts are used. In West Asia, Arabic, Persian and Urdu Scripts are used. In Ethiopia and Eritrea, Ge'ez script is used. In former Soviet countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia and Russia, Cyrillic script is used. In Greece, Greek script is used. In Nepal, Devanagari script is used. In Bangladesh, Bengali script is used. In Myanmar, Burmese script is used. In Thailand, Thai script is used. In Cambodia, Khmer script is used. In Mongolia, Mongol and Cyrillic is used. In China and Taiwan, Chinese characters is used. In both Koreas, Hangul is used. In Japanese, Kanji is used. In Maldives, Dhivehi is used. In Sri Lanka, both Tamil and Sinhala are used.

So why not in India? When the whole world is following a different convention by taking pride in their scripts , why are Indian OSMappers saying no Romanized script is better.

Just why????
PlaneMad (2020-10-30 02:10:32+00:00): The goal for everyone has been to create India maps that we can fully translate into each Indic language https://github.com/osm-in/openstreetmap.in/issues/14, theres no question about not being proud of our own languages.

By not following a common convention for the data, it makes it harder to reach this goal since data processing becomes more complex. Assuming you have read past discussion on the topic https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=720741#p720741 please propose a system that can work well for the whole country and not just for one state.

To be clear, this is an open problem and its important to discuss with others to find a practical solution with best benefits.
user_5359 (2020-10-23 15:39:31+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag DONE=Y? Don't the OSM data for working organisation!
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-10-23 16:23:20+00:00): Sorry, my bad -- I forgot to delete some tags that I use for processing the data. I'll shortly remove them
canfe (2020-10-22 06:34:47+00:00): Ho visto che hai trasformato il riverbank in river della Stura.
Penso tu lo abbia fatto seguendo le indicazioni di ID.
In realtà il river è l'asse principale
Il riverbank dove c'è aqua
E il riverbed la zona "pelata" dalla piena annuale dei torrenti.
Non fidarti troppo di ID, è criticato per alcune posizioni prese dalla comunità OSM
trmsy (2020-10-22 06:38:37+00:00): Ciao, sì mi sono fidato di iD esattamente come hai detto tu. Ti ringrazio per il commento e le correzioni, sono ancora abbastanza novellino. Mi scuso per la edit sbagliata. Proverò a far tornare le cose come erano prima. :)
trmsy (2020-10-22 06:41:27+00:00): Ho cambiato i tag, potresti controllare che è giusto? Grazie mille.
canfe (2020-10-25 14:51:47+00:00): Ni…
Diciamo che hai ripristinato la situazione a prima e va bene.
In realtà, a mio avviso, molti TORRENTI DI FONDO VALLE son mappati male.

Il river è dove passa il flusso maggiore
Il bank dove di solito c’è acqua
Il bed dove ci sono i sassi pelati dalla piena annuale

Tra bank e bed dovrebbe esserci una zona di shingle

Prova a vederti la wiki cosa dice e dammi un tuo di parere.
trmsy (2020-10-25 15:17:50+00:00): Ah, sì, io intendevo il fatto di averlo ripristinato come era prima, non di averlo aggiustato del tutto, quello sembra possa essere un lavoro per il futuro. Grazie mille per le dritte, controllerò la wiki, ma sembra che quello che tu abbia detto abbia senso.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-22 06:29:49+00:00): Can you link documentation page on the Wiki and place where this import was discussed with the local community?

What is the license of the imported data?
NKA (2020-10-22 06:53:14+00:00): Here is the import wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)

All required info is there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-22 08:15:06+00:00): Thanks! Though note that link to that page should be in changeset description or in  changeset tags (or in changeset comments if edits are already created).
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-22 08:20:53+00:00): "All required info is there." link to required waiver seems missing.

See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ for details.

I am aware that it is a long term import and it started before this requirement was known to be necessary :(
NKA (2020-10-22 08:36:03+00:00): The link to the waiver/explicit permission is labeled "Link to permission" in the wiki. Here it is: http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html
nevw (2020-10-22 05:45:16+00:00): Hi, 
these are not named, only the roadways carry the street name.
It is not ok to name the footways in this manner.
iWowik (2020-10-22 06:10:16+00:00): Я вам уже писал комментарий с просьбой выполнять принятые правила наименования улиц, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92778474
Но вы почему-то продолжаете писать по-своему
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862417356/history
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-14 01:34:38+00:00): Hi Danil. Your edit looks awesome, but I need you to improve highway (id 973396101) due crossing with water body (id 11781604). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142907032). Thank you.
Danil (2022-12-14 07:02:27+00:00): OK, done in changeset 130061314
eggie (2020-10-22 06:49:11+00:00): Dag twijland.. Bij twee instellingen in één gebouw kun je beter de cholen op twee aparte nodes taggen. Bij voorkeur de adresnodes.
Of is het gewoon één school?
MVG,
eggie
canfe (2024-09-12 10:32:41+00:00): OSMOSE segnala errore
Barrier blocking highway
node 6411928356 josm iD edit
kerb = lowered
barrier = kerb
wheelchair = yes
tactile_paving = yes
pensi sia da togliere barrier o che sia un errore OSMOSE?
eggie (2020-10-22 06:45:36+00:00): Dag twijland.. Hier heb ik amenity=school toegevoegd aan het terrein en de naam en website daar ook naar toe verplaatst.
building=school is correct, maar maakt het nog geen onderwijsinstelling.
Je moet straks maar eens kijken hoe het rendert.
MVG,
Eggie
TravGW (2020-10-22 14:22:21+00:00): Why delete this road? As far as I can tell, it still exists in all the imagery I've checked. If you deleted it because it is a road no one should be on you can mark access as "private" or as "no".
befit1 (2020-10-23 09:56:24+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for deletion of the road. Will ensure not to repeat such mistake again. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
befit1.
maraf24 (2021-03-16 21:22:34+00:00): Różnice pozycji w porównaniu z rzeczywistymi sięgają kilkudziesięciu metrów.
4004 (2020-10-24 22:05:10+00:00): здравствуйте, но октябрьская же западнее уже есть?
pzzvz (2020-10-26 07:01:56+00:00): Добрый день! Два соседних дома имеют адрес Октябрьской, хотя фактически находятся на Речной
4004 (2020-10-26 11:21:07+00:00): хм, а речную я вижу только севернее - может стоит ее продлить?
если дома относятся к какой то улице, то для этого не нужно обозначать дорогу рядом с домами именем этой улицы - достаточно скопировать название улицы в адресные теги
4004 (2020-10-26 11:23:45+00:00): а не, увидел речную. 
негласное соглашение, что все именованные дороги это минимум unclassified (за городом или в промзоне) или residential. service - это дворовые проезды и подьезды к домам
pzzvz (2020-10-26 11:35:07+00:00): Адресные теги уже давно проставлены. У местных жителей возникают проблемы с сервисами доставки и такси - думаю, оптимальным будет любое решение, которое решит эти проблемы. 18й дом относится к речной.