piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mordechai23 (2021-10-29 16:45:09+00:00): Patrzyłeś co przywracasz? Tu były narysowane zdublowane węzły z sektorami oznaczone jako landuse=cemetery i jeszcze do tego sektory z numerami w name= zamiast w ref...
Littlebtc (2022-02-23 17:12:58+00:00): 您好，感謝您的貢獻 QQ

我發現您似乎在這個編輯相信了 Bing 的偏移（目前所有商業圖資有5公尺左右的偏移都很正常），導致您把一大片萬華區的馬路對歪了；我會在接下來的編輯重新對回去。

如果您未來還有機會貢獻的話，請注意任何圖資軍需要先跟盡可能準確的來源先校正：台灣可以利用國土中心 Open Data 的圖資（目前我們能取得準確度最高的圖資）確認道路是否有偏移後，再手動透過 iD 調整衛星圖偏移。
Littlebtc (2022-02-23 17:59:40+00:00): 改好了

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117781634
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:52+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859307
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:46+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859307
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:41+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859307
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:35+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859307
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:25+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859307
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:06+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:15:00+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:54+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:42+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:36+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:31+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
Frans S (2021-11-06 15:47:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Map more accurate and square buildings.
Buildings needs to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing else.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112859162
dvdhoven (2021-10-23 10:33:56+00:00): Das Radverkehrsnetz NRW Stadt Aachen is kein Netzwerk, sondern eine route. (type=route)
Für die Stadt muss dann ein Netwerk (type=network) gemacht werden. 
Aber dann machen Sie es schwierig da mann viele connection routes bekommt zwischen Stadt und Region.
Bestens mann nutzt ein Netzwerk.
dvdhoven (2021-10-23 10:34:38+00:00): Nur ein Netzwerk wird kotrolliert in knooppuntnet.nl
Head (2021-10-23 17:21:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde versuchen, es in ein Network umzuwandeln. Die Routen, die nicht an Knotenpunkten enden, würde ich dann taggen wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dbicycle#Verbindungen_im_Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerk.2C_die_nicht_an_nummerierten_Knoten_enden

Das könnte aber ein bisschen dauern.
Head (2021-10-23 22:12:30+00:00): Habe nochmal nachgeguckt. So, wie es jetzt ist, wird es von knooppuntnet.nl doch korrekt angezeigt.
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:23+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859347
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:14:02+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:55+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:48+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:41+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:33+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:26+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:12+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:13:01+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859377
Frans S (2021-11-06 15:43:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: accurate mapping
D: connected nodes of buildings to highway.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112859299
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:26:55+00:00): reverted with changeset 112859627
fabiotofy (2021-10-22 23:48:13+00:00): vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112859660
daganzdaanda (2021-10-22 23:48:39+00:00): reverted with changeset #112859766
marczoutendijk (2021-10-23 07:49:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5400
HirschKauz (2021-10-23 19:13:37+00:00): Hi mortensonsucks! 
please read this: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112859660
eggie (2021-10-23 06:47:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback. Best netjes geworden..., maar iets van een luchtfoto veranderen is lastig. Ik pas even wat aan mbv de data van BGT en BAG.
De landuse = grass maak ik even los van de school.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112859705

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-23 07:13:43+00:00): De schoolnaam heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode nr 20.
Wat is de functie van Philips de Goedestraat 162?
Kloppen de adressen nog steeds hier of loopt het Kadaster achter?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=0622010000068566&geometry.x=81718.547&geometry.y=436833.27699977&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0622100000057774


De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.

MVG
eggie
Stalker61 (2021-10-23 14:55:45+00:00): Привет.
Который день наблюдаю за вашим творчеством и очень хочется задать один вопрос. А на основании чего вы решили, что снимки от Maxar и Esri лучше снимков Bing, а вы улучшаете данные в Сургуте?
С наилучшими пожеланиями, Stalker61
Hi.
What day I have been watching your work and I really want to ask one question. And on what basis did you decide that the pictures from Maxar and Esri are better than Bing pictures, and you are improving the data in Surgut?
Best regards, Stalker61
Stalker61 (2021-10-23 15:09:28+00:00): Я имею ввиду геометрию объектов: направление и перекрестки улиц, положением зданий строений и сооружений.
I mean the geometry of objects: the direction and intersections of streets, the position of buildings, structures and structures.
CloudySky (2021-10-26 16:00:39+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for reaching out. Originally when looking at this area, I determined that Maxar and Esri would be an appropriate imagery for alignment due to the area within way 603442975 as well as near way 314240238. In these areas, Maxar and Esri show more development and construction, so I judged these imageries to be more recent than other imageries like Bing.

In relation to the alignment of roads, I was using Strava as well as GPS and GPX traces. In general, I believe that the different imageries are actually very similar in terms of alignment in this area. However, when looking at Strava and the GPS/GPX traces around way 429043799, I believe that that the Maxar and Esri imageries are the best aligned for most of the surrounding area.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention,
CloudySky
Stalker61 (2021-10-27 09:47:30+00:00): Привет.
Спасибо за ваш ответ. К сожалению вынужден не согласиться с вашим мнением о качестве данных представленных на снимках Maxar и Esri. Там повсеместно присутствуют грубые искажения точечных, линейных и площадных объектов. К примеру, дороги извиваются как змеи, дома прямоугольной формы превращются в сложные бесформенные структуры и т.п. Примеров можно приводить бесконечно. Актуальность по наличию новых объектов на снимках представленных Maxar и Esri никто не собирается оспаривать, но для выравнивания объектов они абсолютно непригодны. Чтобы внести данные о здании в тех же Барсово и Белом Яре приходится смещать его к близлежащей точке уже привязанному по Bing объекту (близлежащее здание) прекресток дорог или улиц). Я сам только что это сделал вслед за вашими правками с использованием gps-треков.
Об ошибочности вашего мнения как раз и свидетельствует характер внесенных вами изменений.
Именно поэтому я и другие пользователи занимающиеся маппингом в данном регионе и в частности в Сургуте используем для привязки именно Bing, а для корректировок актуальности данных Maxar и Esri. Иначе никак.
С наилучшими пожеланиями, Stalker61

Hi.
Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I have to disagree with your opinion about the quality of the data presented in the images by Maxar and Esri. There are gross distortions of point, line and area objects everywhere. For example, roads twist like snakes, rectangular houses turn into complex shapeless structures, etc. Examples are endless. No one is going to dispute the relevance of the presence of new objects in the images provided by Maxar and Esri, but they are absolutely unsuitable for aligning objects. To enter data about a building in the same Barsovo and Beliy Yar, it is necessary to shift it to a nearby point already linked by Bing to an object (a nearby building) (intersection of roads or streets). I just did this myself, following your edits using gps tracks.
The nature of the changes you have made testifies to the erroneousness of your opinion.
That is why I and other users engaged in mapping in this region, and in particular in Surgut, use Bing for linking, and for correcting the relevance of Maxar and Esri data. No other way.
Best regards, Stalker61
CloudySky (2021-10-28 16:31:05+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for your response. I have gone back into areas of Surgut and, at a quick glance, have noticed some shifts around major highways (ex. way 490522368, way 34229846), so I see what you are saying.

I have shared this information with my team, and will only align to Bing in Surgut going forward. Please let me know if there are any specific issues you would like me to undo.

Thanks,
CloudySky
mvexel (2021-10-27 14:59:12+00:00): I can't do that all by myself Keith! :D
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
lyctkel (2023-08-31 09:06:16+00:00): Hi H*M*K,
at way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995752589 you have used recycling:PMD.
In the meantime, the spelling with lowercase letters has become established (see also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Arecycling%3Apmd).
Do you mean the described recycling:pmd and can I change the spelling?
Regards,
lyctkel
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
mariotomo (2022-06-04 20:03:30+00:00): hola. quieren ayuda? han llenado el lugar de datos que seguramente tienen relevancia y sentido, pero la forma como lo hicieron no explica de qué se trata. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1j1q
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Dawid2849 (2021-10-23 10:02:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98560855

Q23413 chyba będzie lepszy niż Q9386654?
kubahahaha (2021-10-23 10:15:42+00:00): Usunąłem błąd
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-24 05:32:56+00:00): Hello, please do not reduce the quality of existing tagging. iD editor is giving incorrect advices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cartography/Waterways
mariotomo (2021-10-25 20:36:32+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir al mapa OSM. es una casualidad que justamente en estos días estaba revisando la misma zona … como nuevo mapero quizás no conoces el foro? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
Manuel11 (2021-10-25 20:53:14+00:00): Hola! Gracias por el mensaje, en efecto no conocía el foro, acabo de ver tu mensaje, seguimos la discusión allá, saludos!
AgusQui (2021-11-01 04:25:49+00:00): Hasta que no este habilitada se debe mantener como estacion abandonada.
gscholz (2021-10-25 16:17:16+00:00): Hi Qualhano,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database, first regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-40.45491&lat=-20.11865&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

and second Rio Santa Maria now is partly duplicated.

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
jleedev (2021-10-23 02:09:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2021-10-23 09:19:15+00:00): Hi Clarke,
a. I think the cycleway tags at the middlepart may be removed and replaced by bicycle=use_sidepath..
b. How do I manage to reach the cycleroute to the next bridge. Its impossible now to cross the junction Weteringschans?
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112860840
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-23 09:24:00+00:00): Any way I made a connection to cross the junction. (highway=cycleway)
Pleas have a look at the cyclewaytags in the middlepart. They are outdated now. 
gr eggie
martien-176 (2021-10-23 18:17:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to HOT. Good to have you and thanks for your time. 

Before you proceed with mapping, please watch these  2 interesting and educational videos about mapping buildings. It only takes a few minutes of your time but will enhance the quality of your mappings.

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Another tip: the project you are mapping here (#537) dates back from 2014. There is a good chance it is abandoned by the creators. To be on the safe side, please pick projects from 2020 or later.

Thanks for your cooperation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112860848
martien-176 (2021-10-23 18:20:34+00:00): Please forget what i said about project #537. This was a mistake from my side. Sorry for the inconvenience.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
ZLima12 (2021-11-12 02:09:02+00:00): You changed Broadway into a foot path. Please, be more careful in the future.
GITNE (2023-02-06 11:40:30+00:00): The same applies to this changeset. Please revert  or fix according to guidelines your `destination` tag changes.
jptolosa (2021-11-04 18:36:15+00:00): Hola,
en San Carlos agregaste un enlace de autopista que está clausurado desde hace mucho tiempo.
Poner atención a las barreras visibles en las fotos.
Saludos.
Frame&Focus (2022-01-18 21:25:32+00:00): Looks great! Thank you for contributing to OSM. :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112861902
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
BCNorwich (2021-10-23 08:21:43+00:00): Hi, There are many gaps in the hedge line and some parts are fences anyway. 
As I said before, because of the above reasons it's best not to add the tag barrier=hedge to a farmland area, especially as the features are not similar, one is linear the other an area.

Thus I've removed the hedge tag.

Regards Bernard.
Frame&Focus (2021-11-10 08:30:35+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your contribution. This edit contains crossing ways; in the future please make sure your ways intersect with a node. Also, please provide a source for your edits. :) Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112862287
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
nevw (2021-10-23 10:39:35+00:00): Hi
are the waypoints sign posted and labelled as such on the walk or are they your private information?
SSCB Walks (2021-10-24 02:21:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for your feedback :) these waypoints are not signed but indicate a turn-off in the trail. This is my first go at this, would you suggest leaving naming the turns as waypoints, out of the map?
nevw (2021-10-24 02:33:41+00:00): Yes, waypoints are not normally mapped as you can see the junctions along the path on the map. Normally waypoints are added as needed to any gps traces that we might load on to a gps device.
SSCB Walks (2021-10-24 02:38:10+00:00): Oh apologies, any way they can be deleted? I guess I should go back to the drawing board before posting walks :)
nevw (2021-10-24 09:42:42+00:00): Hi
yes, the waypoints can be deleted by selecting in the editor and then deleting.
nevw (2021-10-24 09:51:12+00:00): more specifically...
If the waypoint is a node of the path then just delete the name and description tags and leave the node intact, but if the waypoint is on it’s own separate node, then just delete the node.
Tks
SSCB Walks (2021-10-24 20:59:25+00:00): ok thanks :)
tuttiton (2021-10-23 15:27:12+00:00): Please remove fictional information from the map
marczoutendijk (2021-10-23 15:58:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5405

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 13:38:51+00:00): Поправьте формат телефона в соответствии с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112863839
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 13:37:26+00:00): Очень неаккуратная геометрия. Для объектов правильной формы не забывайте использовать клавишу Q для выравнивания углов.

Теги office=yes; opening_hours=Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 не несут никакой полезной информации. Это какой-то абстрактный офис с обычным графиком работы. Кому это может быть интересно.
Хотя бы уточните, что за офис: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office
и задайте наименование организации тегом name=*, если это действительно офис, обслуживавший посетителей, а не просто офис, где работают 5 человек. В последнем случае  его вообще не стоит наносить на карту.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112863957
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
EinKonstanzer (2021-10-23 19:31:12+00:00): Sind wir hier in der Prärie? :-) Bitte statt natural=grassland für städtische Rasenflächen landuse=grass benutzen. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
Mahdi Aghashiri (2021-10-28 09:07:11+00:00): مشکل نامگذاری چه بوده است؟
JeroenHoek (2021-10-23 12:16:12+00:00): Het Leeuwarderbos is toch echt wel een stukje verder.
UltraNerd (2021-10-24 13:25:48+00:00): Je hebt absoluut gelijk, dit is meer de Prinsentuin denk ik dan? Dat was dus nog de omschrijving van een vorige set met aanpassingen... Maar een omschrijving kan ik niet meer aanpassen volgens mij
JeroenHoek (2021-10-24 16:52:27+00:00): De Prinsentuin is aan de andere kant van de gracht. :)

Verder maakt het niet uit, soms pak je wel eens per ongeluk een oude changesetomschrijving.
iWowik (2021-10-26 10:56:34+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтес , пожалуйста, правильного порядка напсиания названий улиц.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833466467/history
Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 21:57:05+00:00): тег source=bing (или указание каких либо других снимков) давно устарел. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:source
Вы используете редактор iD и пакету правок автоматически назначается тег imagery_used=Bing aerial imagery.

Ещё маленькое напоминание. Было бы отлично, если бы вы выравнивали углы с помощью клавиши Q. Даже как-то стыдно это писать маперу с пятилетним стажем. :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112864751
nicolarus (2021-10-24 07:41:13+00:00): Спасибо за замечания, буду знать. Поправил немного.
Если будут еще замечания, пишите не стесняйтесь :))) чтобы ошибки не плодить.
Supaplex (2021-11-01 14:52:12+00:00): OpenStreetMap 计划是全球性的，依据 de facto 状况，南海为争议区域，name栏位请用实际控制的国家的命名，其他语言则加到对应的语言栏位，所以请别只有加中文名称，移除其他语言以及Wikidata连结
Tesla (2021-10-23 13:50:20+00:00): Опять копируете из других карт? Говорил-же вам что в OSM этого делать нельзя. Прийдется откатывать все ваши правки.ю
Discostu36 (2021-10-23 08:42:33+00:00): ... And buildings
mavl (2021-10-24 14:35:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет супермаркет, но этот супермаркет не находится в каком-либо здании (сейчас на карте), что маловероятно. Кроме того, поблизости нет больших зданий, в которых мог бы поместиться супермаркет (очень большой магазин).