piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JJIglesias (2016-04-08 06:25:55+00:00): a) Por principio pueden ponerle F, J, K, L o simplemente lo q gusten en el mapa, pero la realidad es q las carreteras estan nominadas como, 7, 9, 11, 23 o el numero q la ABC les haya asignado. No hay 1 solo cartel que diga F7, F4, F9 o las letras q ustedes gusten. 
b) OSM no es una Utopia de lo q deberia ser, sino un reflejo de lo que ES...
c) Con respecto a los Nodos la ABC publica sus mapas y segmentos y en base a eso Planifican y son informacion oficial del Gobierno de Bolivia, no inventos mios.
d) Con Respecto a Trunk por la definicion de Wiki es una carretera q NO llega a ser Autopista pero que tiene separacion central y dos o mas canales, Criterio q no se aplica para nada a las carreteras Bolivianas que conectan ciudades. Un Primary Road NO es una avenida. Seria bueno q revisaras la Definificion de Highways de cada pais y veras q el Criterio Chileno (No hay de Bolivia) es mas aplicable a Bolivia q el criterio Argentino q es el que ustedes parece que estan aplicando.
e) Puedes restaurar lo q gustes a tu criterio; desde mi punto de vista la ABC es la que determina que vias son y como se llaman, que OSM diga lo q algunos consideren y no refleje la realidad, me parece q le hace un flaco favor a la cartografia de Bolivia.
f) Con gusto participare en las discusiones pertinentes, pero repito mi criterio OSM debe reflejar la realidad "Oficial" emitido por ente autorizado y no simplemente lo que a algunos "aficionados" nos parece...
Saludos
JJ - 72213368
carlos gayón (2016-04-10 06:02:11+00:00): hombre por q borro todo es mas facil modificar y corregir q hacer desde cero
pintoch (2017-01-25 18:14:43+00:00): Hi,
A one-way street now crosses the building you have drawn, from Oxpens road to Abbeyplace. I don't think the other street crossing the construction site is still running. See the note here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/859639
I think I need more surveying to be confident enough to fix this problem.
jbsmg1 (2016-04-07 20:57:56+00:00): A ligação visa o acesso para facilitar o transporte coletivo das Linhas B911 e A335.
agm2112 (2016-04-07 21:07:03+00:00): RJ-165 já se encontra pavimentada com blocos de concreto, e trafegável para veículos de passeio
GerdP (2017-08-24 12:49:44+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo highway=TD Lane
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408718017
I assume it Is highway=residential + name=TD Lane ?
literan (2016-04-08 12:11:09+00:00): задвоил: сам же 3 недели назад его внес уже https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4062327189/history
Zverik (2016-04-08 12:19:46+00:00): Вот блин. Откатил :)
will_p (2016-04-07 22:46:29+00:00): Hi, there's no need to enter speed limits in km/h. You just need to add the unit after the number, e.g. 20 mph.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
alexkemp (2016-04-07 22:51:47+00:00): Hi Will

Thank goodness for that!
SK53 (2016-04-08 10:56:05+00:00): Yes we dropped the idea of having to enter stuff that way a long time ago, and all shared your feeling too.
temporalista (2016-06-03 19:46:07+00:00): Hi!

Please don't change the highway=* labels in this area unless you have a good reason. We invested a lot of time on having them right.
elianoem (2016-04-08 12:34:39+00:00): Camping Don Avelino del Club Ocampense de Caza y Pesca el Irupé. Se encuentra a 8 km al este de la ciudad en el Paraje San Vicente y a orillas del Paraná Miní.
AnnaliseCamelia (2016-04-07 23:16:30+00:00): Este establecimiento se encuentra al margen del rio Milac Navira, el que sufre crecidas en variadas oportunidades cada año
VictorIE (2020-01-29 00:02:59+00:00): Hi,

There are about a dozen untagged ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408751507 Might you know if they are walls/fences/hedges?
multimodaal (2017-10-22 16:03:20+00:00): Beste Padvinder, je hebt onderstaande weg -net als een aantal andere paden in de omgeving intgetekend als highway=path zonder verdere informatie over access (of de bron bij de edit). Hierdoor wordt er standaard vanuit gegaan dat het pad toegankelijk is, maar dat klopt bij veel van deze paden niet, omdat ze privéterrein zijn en met hekken (of expliciete verbodsborden) zijn afgelsoten. Dat kan in de praktijk leiden tot problemen bij het plannen van routes (en boze landeigenaren). Zou je bij de wegen waarvan je de toegankelijkheid niet zelf hebt vastgesteld dat aan kunnen geven (bijvoorbeeld access=unknown /fixme=survey needed) en bij je edits aangeven wat de bron is (ik neem aan luchtfoto ipv survey)?
Op die manier kunnen we elkaar aanvullen in plaats van dat data leidt tot vervelende situaties.

Zie voor deze situatie: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408752091
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BEWbR0_JI3y3hRJNXanyLA
trigpoint (2016-04-08 13:11:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Your edits seem to be over a very wide area, I doubt you have visited them all.
What is the source of these edits? how did you know exactly where these take aways are located?
Thanks Phil
take-a-way (2016-04-08 14:37:00+00:00): 1/ You would be surprised how many i have visited, but no i have not visited them all.
2/ The source of the edits for takeaways  is the website take-a-way.co.uk.
3/ The maps or photos on the menu, google maps (i offer corrections on there also) Google streetmaps i look and the images and count chimneys and other features to identify the exact location.
trigpoint (2016-04-08 15:16:35+00:00): In this case the address given on the menu is not sufficient to locate an individual business, particularly on a long road such as this. You should be aware that copying from copyright sources such as google maps is absolutely against the rules. These are pointed out in http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright, http://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1.
I quote "OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or printed maps) without explicit permission from the copyright holders."
Any contributions which we suspect have contravened these rules should be reverted.
As an aside the website tag should contain the url of the business, which this one has, rather than to a 3rd party listing site.
take-a-way (2016-04-08 15:35:55+00:00): 1/ Who said anything about copying from Google?
2/ What you probably are implying is i can't look at Google images to confirm the location, i should take a photo myself.
3/ yes correct i should have put the broken url (it is working at the moment) as the business and the 3rd party site as the reference.
trigpoint (2016-04-08 15:52:51+00:00): Hi
You are correct, you must not look at google maps to confirm the location. The preferred way of contributing to openstreetmap is to visit the locations and if necessary take photos yourself, although if you have visited then you memory would be good enough. The businesses concerned can obviously add their locations from local knowledge.
There is http://www.mapillary.com/  which contains photos which you can use, but so far it is fairly limited.
Some things can be mapped remotely from bing aerial imagery which is included in osm editors, such as woodland, water, buildings, hedges but shops do need a lot of legwork to map them properly.
trigpoint (2016-04-08 16:04:54+00:00): Sorry, you cannot copy from google images either.
take-a-way (2016-04-08 16:29:26+00:00): You are in error regarding mapillary.
I have just read its terms of use quote-
Mapillary will always be free for personal and non-commercial use.
So if i updated or add something to OSM and it is used commercially by another. Then i would be in breach of their terms by viewing images to gain information which was later used for gain.
Time to stop and find another hobby i think.
Thanks for your comments.
SK53 (2016-04-08 16:45:04+00:00): Mapillary explicitly provide the rights to use its images to add stuff to OSM (just as Mapbox & Bing allow their aerial imagery to be used). The personal license relates to using the Mapillary images & website for purposes other than contributing to OSM. So Mapillary is definitely the best we have as a Google Streetview alternative. Many of us find it quite fun to make sets of pictures and add them to Mapillary: the problem is that as yet coverage is patchy.
take-a-way (2016-04-08 16:59:18+00:00): Yes i thought it might be fun also as i travel around the country a lot and often have time to burn during daylight hours.

But after considering the ramifications of what we are and are not allowed to do i have decided against it.

And to comply with what we are not allowed to do i have begun to delete my entries on OSM.
ValeriaLucía (2016-05-29 00:32:27+00:00): La ciudad marcada por la inundación
mavl (2019-01-07 16:35:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-04-08 16:46:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your modification because you changed the information of whole Los Angeles. Please try again to mark your position on the map. If you need help: You are welcome.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-04-08 16:48:33+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpolice, too.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-04-08 16:41:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't think you live or work on a atm! If you need help to mark the right position: You are welcome!
Tchiller (2016-07-07 13:32:01+00:00): im Norden ist kein Oneway mehr, aber bei der Velo Spur ein opposite_lane. Da ist etwas schief gegangen. Weisst Du, wie es da tatsächlich aussieht?
mavl (2019-01-07 16:36:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-04-12 10:00:57+00:00): Co to znaczy "Trójca i okolice"?
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-04-08 07:03:16+00:00): Når du laver den slags små rettelser er det bedst at bruge Geodatastyrelsens fotos (som du kan vælge under "baggrundsindstillinger" fremfor Bings, som du har gjort her. Geodatastyrelsens fotos er kalibreret en smule bedre.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-04-08 07:05:52+00:00): Please do not touch danish addressnodes
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SherbetS (2021-09-29 17:54:46+00:00): thank you
Achoin (2016-04-20 13:37:49+00:00): Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
1. Северное нагорное уже присутствует на карте в виде "МФК Северное нагорное" и название хорошо просматривается на полигоне торгового центра. 
2. Вы исправили "Телемакс" на "Северное нагорное" На самом деле в этом месте сейчас магазин "DNS"

Исправил ваше "Северное нагорное" на "DNS"

Спасибо за участие.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GerdP (2017-09-22 09:52:12+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo waterway=damm on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408805550
Is this really a dam as described here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam ?
Павел Тимофеев (2016-04-08 07:23:45+00:00): Переименована согласно распоряжению главы Запорожской облгосадминистрации http://www.zoda.gov.ua/images/article/original/000055/55608/210316n115d1.pdf
Jojo4u (2016-05-21 10:49:04+00:00): Hallo Herbert167, highway=no soll nicht benutzt werden. Was möchtest du denn damit sagen? Dass hier mal einer war und wegen ggf. veralteter Luftbilder im Editiermodus noch sichtbar sein sollte?

LG Joachim
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Baloo Uriza (2016-04-08 15:52:55+00:00): I'm fairly sure most of this space bound by 244, Memorial, Pine and 89th would be brownfield.  You can find foundations and stuff from a previously destroyed development in this area.
dmw918 (2016-06-12 22:16:52+00:00): it listed new development in the brownfield description is why i chose grass without knowing much about attribution.
Baloo Uriza (2016-06-12 23:08:14+00:00): Aah, not sure if there's been new development there lately but when I went to go vote at John Ross while I was still living in Mingo RV Park, save for Spartan and the apartments behind it, that block was pretty much overgrown foundations.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:37:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
DD1GJ (2017-11-14 17:48:32+00:00): Revert, da Stolpersteine gelöscht
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-04-08 09:43:47+00:00): Jeg har fjernet det stykke vej den ligger henover. Er det korrekt?
Hjart (2016-04-08 09:46:00+00:00): Jeg kan også opfordre dig til at bruge Geodatastyrelsens fotos, som du kan vælge under "baggrundsindstillinger".
ABSH-DTU (2016-04-08 10:24:18+00:00): Jeps, vejen skal ikke gå igennem bygningen - helt KORREKT!
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
RicoElectrico (2016-04-09 08:07:15+00:00): Oprócz tagu denomination trzeba użyć religion.

Patrz: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
Hjart (2016-04-08 12:03:57+00:00): Jeg er ikke så begejstret for at veje klippes op i unødigt små stykker. Det gør det mere besværligt at kvalitets-tjekke dem og der er trods alt kun få af os der har den nødvendige tid og ekspertise til den slags.
Fod (2016-04-08 12:50:11+00:00): Fuldstændig enig. Så vidt jeg hukser, er jeg endda en gang stødt på et tool, der leder efter sammenhængende veje med nøjagtig samme egenskaber og foreslår at lægge dem sammen.
I dette tilfælde er det god praksis for relationen "destination_sign", at de veje, der har rollerne "to" og "from", er så korte som muligt efter punktet "intersection" for at undgå, at fremtidige rettelser giver fejl i rollerne. Derfor er de opklippede vejstykker ikke ens; det er kun en del af dem, der er medlem af relationen "destination_sign".
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-04-08 11:18:44+00:00): Jeg har rettet dette. Bemærk at jeg, lige efter du lavede din første ændring, lavede en del andre ændringer, som du tilsyneladende ikke har kunnet se.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:38:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GerdP (2017-11-24 13:42:37+00:00): Hi!
You added highway=traffc_signals to a way with railway=tram here. I assume you wanted to change only one node of this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390457206
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
opendcc (2016-04-08 13:58:33+00:00): Hallo,

da ist jetzt zweimal Nr. 5 und 7 in der Karte. Stimmt Dein Eintrag?
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
poornibadrinath (2016-04-11 07:27:33+00:00): @Hölschi
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
maraf24 (2016-04-08 19:35:19+00:00): Please put russian names in name:ru tag.
poornibadrinath (2016-04-11 07:18:09+00:00): @Ambulances du Meldoc
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Marych_ (2016-04-08 20:04:41+00:00): Удивлен, видеть это пакет.
что было?
Zverik (2016-04-08 20:09:49+00:00): В предыдущей версии точки какой-то местный пользователь MAPS.ME заменил название на «????». Скорее всего, кафе закрылось, но поскольку точно непонятно, я решил вернуть предыдущую версию.
Marych_ (2016-04-09 06:19:22+00:00): Надо будет передвинуть, там развязку планируют строить, кафе скорее всего снесли, но давно там там не был.
Будет эстакада от Мукими до Нукуской на Шота Руставели
Marych_ (2016-04-09 06:21:39+00:00): PS Я не успеваю просматривать, что в городе творится от пользователей Maps.me

То что попадалось на глаза, реально приносит пользу, но надо все равно просматривать и поправлять
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2016-04-08 13:27:15+00:00): Maps.Me可能很難找到市場這一選項吧，選市場會比較適合
DD1GJ (2016-04-08 19:02:56+00:00): Hallo Steirerin, Du hast heute ohne vernünftige Begründung ziemlich viele Objekte wie Supermärkte, Restaurants, Fußgängerzone, Haltestellenbereiche, ... gelöscht.

Warum?

Ich bezweifle, dass es all die Dinge nicht mehr gibt.
DD1GJ (2016-04-08 19:36:13+00:00): Nach genauer Analyse wurden alle Edits von Steirerin wg. Vandalismus zurückgesetzt
Steirerin (2016-04-08 19:49:46+00:00): Es tut mir leid, ich wollte diese Änderungen nur für meine eigene Verwendung. Es war mir nicht bewusst, daß ich damit die Karte endgültig verändere.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mw67 (2017-08-24 08:15:37+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast da einen Radweg zwischen Ehrenhain und Lohma mit bridge=yes getaggt. Da ist aber meines Wissens keine Brücke, wie kommst Du darauf? Oder war das ein Versehen?
norge09 (2017-08-24 08:45:51+00:00): Ist korregiert, Gruß Norge09
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:39:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:40:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:40:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Blackbird27 (2016-04-09 18:17:20+00:00): або їх не було, або ви поламали зв'язки перелічені нижче і я думаю що поламали, так як iD editor не дуже дружить зі зв'язками:
Сатиївська сільська рада (6118995, v1)
Варковицька сільська рада (6118994, v1)
Озерянська сільська рада (6118993, v1)
Глинська сільська рада (6118992, v1)
Дядьковицька сільська рада (6118991, v1)
Малошпаківська сільська рада (6118990, v1)
Myhalchyn (2016-04-12 11:54:40+00:00): Я встановлював межі Грушвицької сільської ради згідно кадастрової карти і забув вписати це в опис змін
Blackbird27 (2016-04-12 12:21:46+00:00): Та я вже зрозумів, я буду потрохи малювати межі інших сільрад, бо це незавершені мультиполігони. Дядьковицьку сільську раду уже вчора домалював.
naoliv (2016-05-17 02:27:46+00:00): hbonates, não crie restrições de proibido retornar na própria via.
Isto é desnecessário e errado de se mapear.
mavl (2019-01-07 16:40:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Commodoortje (2016-08-29 17:20:48+00:00): Het lijkt hier wederom om een import te gaan.
Tevens zijn de gebruikte tags niet conform OSM richtlijnen.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 20:31:15+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6119148

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
golyanitskiy (2016-04-09 06:15:44+00:00): Наверное, здесь какая-то ошибка: на Филиппинах аттракцион с русским названием "Скалы Бонда"?
DragonVS (2016-04-09 08:12:20+00:00): В одном из ранних фильмов Бонда (2-й или 3-й, точно не помню) в этих скалах снимался ключевой момент.
Hervé Saint-Amand (2016-04-11 14:38:53+00:00): Castle Rock is of volcanic origin, but there's not a volcano in the heart of Edinburgh. Is this really the right tag?
Rostranimin (2016-04-11 22:03:07+00:00): Hi Essex_Boy - I've reverted the edit to Castle Rock - back to 'peak'. Would be happy to see more detailed discussion of the options, but I don't think you're going to get agreement on natural=volcano. See the discussion also on this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/542849 Sorry, this is a prominent location so I've not waited for long since Herve Saint-Amand's query before doing this.
SK53 (2016-04-12 14:59:22+00:00): Yes indeed please no mapping of volcanic origin rocks as volcanoes. There may be some mapped this way in Germany but I've complained about these particular ones in the past.
Reclus (2016-04-08 22:34:49+00:00): Now ist eine Bio-Limonade.

http://www.drinknow.de/startseite/
Nakaner (2016-04-09 12:48:07+00:00): Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz bei vielen Betriebsstellen (v.a. von der AVG betriebene Stationen) railway:position=* mit Meter-Genauigkeit ergänzt. Was ist denn die Quelle dieser Angaben?

Wenn du die Angaben durch Messen der Abstände zu Punkten mit bekannten Koordinaten ermittelt hast, hättest du dir das Eintragen eigentlich sparen können. Das kann eine Maschine viel schneller. (Bei Adressen spräche man vom "reverse Geocoding")

Für die Überleitstelle Grünbach gilt dasselbe. In den Datensätze auf data.deutschebahn.com ist zwar das Betriebsstellenkürzel enthalten, eine km-Angabe habe ich dort aber nicht gefunden (oder habe ich sie übersehen)?

Ich möchte dich außerdem darum bitten, railway=border nur an der Bundesgrenze, nicht an Landesgrenzen zu verwenden. Beiderseits ist dort die DB Netz (bzw. eines ihrer Regionetze) der Betreiber. railway=border wurde eingeführt, um zwischen einfachen Betreibergrenzen (z.B. DB vs. AVG) und Grenzpunkten an Staatsgrenzen (DB vs. SBB) zu unterscheiden. Bei letzteren ändert sich einfach viel mehr.
maraf24 (2016-04-08 19:48:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408855723
Gdy tam byłem w 2014 teren miał wody po kostki.
elgon (2016-04-10 18:12:49+00:00): Przechodząc widoczną ścieżką, w pierwszej połowie marca tego roku, nie zauważyłem żadnych oznak stagnującej wody.
AMDmi3 (2016-05-13 13:29:51+00:00): Не ломайте, пожалуйста, названия улиц.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог