piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-08 11:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40566565 where the changeset comment is: Alle Edits von MonsterStreamer revertiert, da unglaubwürdig und mit gefälschten Beweisbildern untermauert, siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493&amp;action=new
mapper999 (2016-06-05 08:25:39+00:00): Danke, da hab ich wohl beim Kopieren des Nodes vergessen die Adresse zu ändern.
sabas88 (2016-06-05 09:51:02+00:00): Where can I find the documentation of this bot? (to check what's doing) Thanks
user_870861 (2016-06-07 08:56:32+00:00): hi, 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/botdidier2020...
i use a clone of osmose-backend to detect duplicated geometry and tag for way and nodes
user_870861 (2016-06-07 09:14:59+00:00): you can see issues there (actualy, manual update)
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/fr/errors/graph.png?country=italy*&item=1230
sabas88 (2016-06-07 09:59:52+00:00): Thanks!
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 09:17:19+00:00): it would be nice to also add a name to this hostel.
d1g (2016-06-06 04:55:42+00:00): Что значит "пушкина лермонтова" у этого объекта? Вы были на местности когда-нибудь?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1430578235/history
muralito (2016-12-01 18:03:25+00:00): Please be careful. This is not a junction=rountabout beacuse the other roads have preference.
demetrio_m (2016-12-02 09:43:24+00:00): Thank you for your correction
Andrea Musuruane (2016-06-05 08:33:07+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Gli edifici che inserisci sono spesso sovrapposi a strade e altre feature esistenti. Questo potrebbe essere dovuto all'uso di immagini satellitari differenti. In genere come allineamento in Italia usiamo le immagini PCN 2006 come riferimento.

Ciao,

Andrea
Tomas Straupis (2016-06-05 10:30:01+00:00): Atšauktas nesąmonių žymėjimas.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-05 19:31:06+00:00): Knooppunten geef je aan met rcn_ref=* en niet met name=*.
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
Saskia Pennings (2016-06-05 19:40:03+00:00): Gedaan.
StephaneP (2018-08-23 15:22:52+00:00): Bonjour Truchin,

Est-ce que tu es sûr de l'existence de cette piste cyclable ? J'ai beau chercher sur les différentes imageries, je ne la vois pas. Et vu les sources que tu indiques, je n'ai pas l'impression que tu as eu l'occasion de vérifier sur le terrain.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422917351

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Truchin (2018-08-25 13:54:34+00:00): Bizarre effectivement. Je vérifierai dans une dizaine de jours. Il faut vérifier si ce n'est pas un way que j'ai coupé en 2...
Thomas
StephaneP (2018-08-27 08:35:12+00:00): A priori non, ce n'est pas un way coupé, car les nodes sont de toi et de la même date que le way :-)
Truchin (2018-09-11 09:03:45+00:00): Bon, j'ai vérifié. Effectivement, c'est une erreur. Je n'ai pas trouvé l'éléments qui m'a fait prolongé à tort la piste vers le nord. C'est corrigé
StephaneP (2018-09-11 10:24:35+00:00): Super, merci beaucoup !
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-06 10:58:01+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1197048 ?

Mam wątpliwości czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422918723#map=18/49.95221/22.27450 rzeczywiście miało mieć horse=designated
igeopr (2016-06-05 12:26:53+00:00): ¿Mira tu no duermes? Voy ahora a darle un QC al area trabajada...
Hjart (2016-06-05 13:08:57+00:00): Af hensyn til historikken anbefales det at genbruge eksisterende objekter i stedet for at slette og gentegne dem, sådan som jeg kan se du har gjort her.
dgitto (2016-06-12 22:23:50+00:00): Benvenuto! Ricordati di non usare il tag name se non si tratta di un nome proprio ("fontanella" non è certamente il nome) :-)
Dai una lettura al wiki quando puoi.
Buon mapping
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 17:09:23+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with a test API, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).
Commodoortje (2016-06-11 05:11:40+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
manoharuss (2016-11-15 05:58:58+00:00): Hi chunty,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I am guessing http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3744041480 and  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4226434092 correspond to a same fast food center? Feel free to reply.
chillly (2016-06-10 10:24:38+00:00): Is this a mech edit? 

Association football in the UK is NOT soccer, it is football, and yes I'm sure you're going to quote the wiki at me, but it is NOT soccer in British English.
Warin61 (2016-06-10 21:59:24+00:00): No, fully manual. I have found some to be tennis/netball/basketball courts. One was both rugby and soccer. Where I could not identify what sport was/is played there I left a fixme. Each and every pitch has been looked  at using my eyes using Bing imagery. I have missed some! What do you expect of a human :) 
"Football" means different things in different parts of the world. Most people in OSM use 'soccer' - look at taginfo for the rates of use. It is a clear value that cannot be confused with a 'generic' term like 'football'.
Warin61 (2016-06-10 22:06:48+00:00): A dictionary def of football has 'chiefly';
soccer - British English
Austrailain Rules - Australia WA, SA,Vic and Tasmania
Rugby League - Australia Qld., NSW 
Rugby League or Rugby Union - Australia Qld., NSW 

I'd put money on Americans using the term 'football' for their own sport, not soccer etc.
trigpoint (2016-06-11 00:39:00+00:00): Although in the case of Rugby we should probably differentiate between Rugby Union and and and .........
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 10:44:49+00:00): For the record, "soccer" is _not_ the regular British English term for the sport you're trying to tag here, "football" is.  

There are however cases where OSM has adopted an americanism (e.g. sidewalk) in order to avoid confusion; that may make sense here (but some prior discussion and a heads-up prior to any edit would make sense).

On a more specific level are you sure about Holmesfield FC's ground is (a) still active and (b) is only used for football?  Many community grounds are used for a variety of sports, the pitch markings will change with time, and often other sports are played on a marked football pitch.  Holmesfield FC's website and other social accounts seem to have disappeared, and a quick web search finds people commenting on the club no longer being active.  Is it now used for football (and if so is there a club associated with it, and what is its name?) or is it just a generic village recreation ground (and again if so, what is its name?), or perhaps has it just been reverted to farmland?

You may ask "how should I know, I'm on the other side of the planet?", but you are the last person editing this object, and you did claim that your edit was not mechanical...
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 14:44:01+00:00): On further investigation (going through all the tag changes in here), I've reverted this for the reasons described above and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39953300 .  Far more tag changes made things "more wrong" rather than just "differently wrong" or correct" A large number of items do need proper local survey - for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300463574 is presumably misplaced and should incorporate the bowls pitch to the north, but what clubs (of the 3 on site) is the building part of?
The use of an Americanism in place of a Britsh English term "football" can and should be discussed on talk-gb as part of a "mechanical edit" discussion, but more worrying was the removal of "sport" tags from a number of features (including source=survey ones) in the list - see the tag changes in http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=39812846 .  If you believe that that change was not a mistake, then I'd suggest that it's something that you need to discuss that on talk-gb as well, and with previous mappers of those objects.
muralito (2016-06-10 11:38:51+00:00): Hola. ¿El reddentis que agregaste es un consultorio o la sede de la cooperativa?
corfede (2016-06-09 09:58:01+00:00): Per i poligoni taggati con leisure o landuse è implicito che si tratti di aree, pertanto non deve essere utilizzato il tag area=yes.
Владимир К (2016-06-06 07:59:53+00:00): Что-то вызывают некоторые вопросы ваша правка. Дом это просто частный дом? или все таки то, что соответствует http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism=chalet?uselang=ru этому и заведение называется "дом"?

Остановку действительно переименовали из дом кино в черноморнефтегаз?
Владимир К (2016-06-06 08:05:31+00:00): Тип топлива, реализуемый на заправке нужно прописывать тэгами. Название овощной ларек - не название, а описание.
Владимир К (2016-06-12 08:10:03+00:00): нельзя именовать дороги по направлению
Владимир К (2017-01-24 08:39:44+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4226504397#map=19/47.00245/142.72511 что это? надо дополнить тегами объекта
shura0 (2016-06-09 09:19:10+00:00): Привет!

"Сервисный центр Re-Master" это магазин электроники или действительно сервисный центр?
Piskvor (2016-06-06 11:50:22+00:00): Hello, OSM is not a place for your personal notes. Please don't add a "name" unless the place is actually named that way.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39836702
BeKri (2016-06-06 12:28:09+00:00): Servus,
der Supermarkt wird in der Berduaxstr.3 aber noch angezeigt.
entweder tag rausnehmen oder 
disused:  vor den shop.
marcoSt (2016-06-06 15:34:36+00:00): Servus,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab's jetzt mit disused:shop bereinigt.
Hjart (2016-06-05 14:10:46+00:00): Også her har du slettet og gentegnet flere huse. Det anbefales at undgå dette
Lytter1 (2016-06-05 15:54:20+00:00): Hej Hjart, det tager jeg til efterretning.
Hjart (2016-06-06 08:20:06+00:00): Mange tak. Det er ikke altid det helt kan lade sig gøre, men så vidt det er muligt forsøger jeg altid selv at bevare relevant historik.
Commodoortje (2016-06-11 05:17:20+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
eggie (2020-03-21 16:01:10+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar waarschijnlijk nog wel geen welkomstmail ontvangen .. bij deze alsnog ...Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2016-06-05 15:21:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is "15 Below" really a restaurant? Or better a ice cream shop (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dice_cream )?
Ars-UA (2016-06-05 12:27:55+00:00): Аккуратней с редактированием, пожалуйста.
Supaplex (2016-06-05 16:27:30+00:00): 請問這家餐廳的名稱是？
Commodoortje (2016-06-11 05:31:00+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Commodoortje (2016-06-11 05:37:02+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
shop=jewelry is natuurlijk niet juist
Constable (2016-06-07 10:05:26+00:00): ciao, se si tratta di un normale attraversamento pedonale (strisce pedonali) va mappato così http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing; mappato come hai fatto tu sembra più un'isola pedonale.
Se hai dubbi su come mappare determinati oggetti guarda qua:
http://learnosm.org/it/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org
oppure chiedi nella mailing list
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

grazie
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Endres Pelka (2016-06-05 17:41:50+00:00): Hi, the hospital was already added there as a multipolygon. Why making a duplicate? You could just edit the address of the existing object.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
endbacher (2016-06-05 20:23:17+00:00): Official name is TEDi.
emergency99 (2016-06-05 22:36:10+00:00): Then we would have to change a lot of names to TEDi, as most of those stores are named "Tedi" in osm, I also would rather write names in a "normal" fashion.
emergency99 (2016-06-05 22:37:49+00:00): But if more stores are written "TEDi" in OSM, there should be a solution to only have on of the varietys of the name
emergency99 (2016-06-05 22:43:33+00:00): There are about 90 stores in Europe named "TEDi" in OSM and 216 written like "Tedi"
Greg_Rose (2017-10-08 05:41:22+00:00): Many of these objects are fake, and do not exist. User has had over a year to respond to changeset comments - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc). 
Deleting/reverting.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:57:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
magagran (2016-06-05 14:44:14+00:00): En la ciudad de Tucumán se concentran 2 avenidas muy circuladas, av.  Francisco de Aguirre y Mitre que llevan desde esos puntos a la ciudad. En  el cruce de esas venidas  se encuentra un semáforo  a 5 cuadras nos encontramos con una institución de bien, como  Cotolengo  Don Orione donde funciona un colegio religioso. En la zona de 12 de octubre entre Chazarreta e Isabel la católica nos encontramos con zona de mucha agua en caso de lluvia.  También    encontramos un centro de emergencia, Y un restaurant.
Self-Perfection (2016-06-06 09:55:49+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Я не был в этом месте Борисовского парка и не знаю точно, какие объекты вы хотели обозначить, но вероятно это такие же туристично/шашлычные столы под навесом, как на противоположной стороне борисовских прудов. Посмотрите, какие я там использовал теги http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2495947936 Думаю этот набор тегов гораздо полнее и точнее описывает объект в реальности (но стоит поконсультироваться с вики)
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-05 15:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
highflyer74 (2016-06-06 14:25:22+00:00): Sorry to bother you again. This looks like a road. Intermittent flooding after rain should not be tagged like a lake. You could instead add the road if it is there...
maraf24 (2016-06-05 23:46:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2894397137/history
Wiesz, te punkty z adresami, które kasujesz, mają też pole source:addr. Je też wypadałoby przenieść na obrys.
w iD do przenoszenia adresów możesz użyć funkcji scalania obiektów, to ta ikonka z plusem.
owiecc (2016-06-08 15:24:03+00:00): Dzięki. Człowiek uczy się całe życie.
user_5359 (2016-06-05 15:12:55+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Müsst es nicht Clemens-August-Straße statt Clemens-Auguststrasse lauten?
Pläät (2016-06-05 15:58:34+00:00): Völlig richtig! da hab ich wohl nen Bindestrich vergessen. Sorry!
highflyer74 (2016-06-06 14:15:23+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Also please do not add any personal data to the public database.

All the best,

highflyer74
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-05 15:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
user_5359 (2017-08-29 16:45:24+00:00): Hello, Please check the position of your node and move him to the right building.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 11:16:10+00:00): Hello at welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I don't think the church name here was actually missing - it's been there for 4 years as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154411113 .
eggie (2018-04-27 15:04:12+00:00): Ha Ligfietser .. ik heb "je Hunnenkerkhof" een eind verder neergelegd. Was al helemaal teleurgesteld dat ik 'm vandaag niet kon vinden. :)

Groet, Eggie
Владимир К (2016-06-06 08:02:16+00:00): Что значит автобусная остановка в воде?
свалки обозначаются по другому. откатываю полностью
Владимир К (2016-06-12 09:06:40+00:00): обсуждение ваших ошибок http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=596318#p596318
Владимир К (2016-06-06 07:55:55+00:00): Кавычки в названии не нужны
Firefishy (2016-06-05 16:05:51+00:00): Great first edit! Welcome to OpenStreetMap ;-)
Hjart (2016-06-05 17:59:40+00:00): Det kan være en god ide at bruge Geodatastyrelsens fotos (som kan vælges under "baggrundsindstillinger") i stedet for Bings, da de er et par år nyere
Владимир К (2016-06-06 08:02:42+00:00): Уберите кавычки из названий
Владимир К (2016-06-06 08:04:24+00:00): Стройматериалы это shop=do_it_yourself
virgilinojuca (2016-06-05 22:29:04+00:00): Oi, Adonai, tudo bem? Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap. Antes de mais nada, gostaria de convidá-lo a participar dos nossos recém-criados grupos OpenStreetMap Pará no Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmpa/) e Telegram (telegram.me/osmpa).

Já sobre os seus changesets nessa área, notei que você apagou algumas vias que são visíveis nas imagens do Bing. Elas não existem mais ou foi algum engano?

Um abraço.
Adonai Canez (2016-06-06 01:44:24+00:00): Essas ruas que apareciam, se existirem estão dentro de alguma propriedade privada, inclusive elas estavam se sobrepondo a rua que foi criada. Eu exclui mas mas acabou que não exclui tudo, tem que analisar melhor o que falta excluir e posteriormente corrigir. Nas próximas semanas eu deixo essa parte correta.
virgilinojuca (2016-06-06 14:53:27+00:00): Bom, a rua ser privada não é motivo pra que ela não seja mapeada no OSM; basta adicionar a tag access=private, que a via não será calculada em roteadores, por exemplo.

Se elas estavam se sobrepondo à nova rua, talvez fosse um problema de alinhamento da imagem de satélite. As imagens de satélite podem ser alinhadas com dados de GPS ou então a gente pega o alinhamento dos elementos já presentes na área.

O problema de excluir, caso você esteja pensando em desenhá-las de novo, é que dessa forma se perde o histórico para aquelas vias. Uma das boas práticas do OSM é tentar sempre manter o histórico dos elementos ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history ). Se você quiser, posso “desdeletar” as vias que estavam ali (que não dá pra fazer no iD, e é mais manual).
Adonai Canez (2016-06-07 14:08:24+00:00): Se você deseja restaurar aquela via, pode fazer isso só tenta arrumar ela para que não se sobreponha na pista que é pública e que é de fato utilizada pelas pessoas em geral. Na entrada dessa pista pode marcar que existe um portaria também.
Commodoortje (2016-06-11 05:43:36+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-05 19:39:43+00:00): Jouw toevoegingen veranderen niets aan de toegankelijkheid. Die wordt geregeld met access=*. En wat dat betreft was die Beukenlaan al gewoon toegankelijk voor iedereen.
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
Arie Rijneveld (2016-06-05 20:43:35+00:00): Na nummer 4 is de weg niet meer toegankelijk voor auto's. Nummer 4, 4a, 4b en 4c zijn dus per auto alleen toegankelijk via de Bockhorstweg... dat was eigenlijk wat ik wilde aangeven. Beukenlaan 2 is bereikbaar vanaf de Kerkweg.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-06 09:23:12+00:00): Staat er dan een paaltje/hek op de weg ter hoogte van nr. 4. (of net voorbij nr. 2) En staat er ook een bord "verboden voor autos" o.i.d.?
En klopt de snelheidsbeperking van 60km op het zanderige deel van die Beukenlaan?
En die access=* tag is nodig om routeringsprogramma's goed hun werk te laten doen.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-06 09:25:16+00:00): En als iemand van de Kerkweg de Beukenlaan inrijdt, tot hoever kan hij die laan dan oprijden? Wat gebeurt er als hij nr. 2 voorbij is?
Arie Rijneveld (2016-06-06 09:46:50+00:00): De weg die niet toegankelijk is voor auto's is in zeer slechte staat, wordt niet onderhouden. Er liggen nu grote rioolbuizen waardoor het voor auto's niet meer toegankelijk is. Het is een 'eigen weg' en de bebording is niet goed voor elkaar waardoor auto's zich nog wel eens vast rijden. 

Het buitengebied van Spankeren is 60 km. Op deze half verharde weg zou ik overigens geen 60 km per uur rijden.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-06 09:50:23+00:00): Mogen fietsers daar wel rijden?
marczoutendijk (2016-06-06 09:51:24+00:00): Zo nee, dan lijkt het mij het beste om die weg met "access=private" te markeren.
Arie Rijneveld (2016-06-06 09:53:43+00:00): Ze mogen daar wel rijden, is geen fijn pad om te fietsen maar gebeurt wel.
trigpoint (2016-06-05 19:21:55+00:00): Hi, you seem to have created an isolated way which is going to show up as a problem on QA tools.
What was the source of this service road and should it not be connected to something?
user_5359 (2016-06-06 04:34:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you have an more information about the artwork (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork)?
kayle (2016-06-06 11:30:38+00:00): Vitaj v OSM. Ak môžem poznámku neodporúčam moc maps.me používať ako editor. Nepozná veľa tagov. Napr v tomto prípade sa menil adresný bod (presnejšie addr:housenumber), ale sú tam aj iné tagy, ktoré ostali neopravené. Konkrétne súpisné číslo (addr:conscriptionnumber) a orientačné číslo (addr:streetnumber)
user_5359 (2016-06-06 04:05:15+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! In OSM werden die Objekte beschrieben nicht benannt. In Deinen Fall scheint diese Wiki Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dcable_distribution_cabinet die richtige zu sein.

Werbung in eine Sache: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch
vibrog (2016-06-20 07:56:45+00:00): Igjen: Her har du slettet andres arbeider.
kayle (2016-06-06 11:42:08+00:00): Do názvu (name) sa zvykne dávať názov objektu a nie popis ako napr. "Ihrisko multifunkčné s pevným povrchom" 
Typ ihriska som upravil, ale ten pevný povrch je aký? Asfalt, betón, alebo niečo iné?
ďakujem
hsc666 (2016-07-02 16:00:17+00:00): Gleiches Problem wie bei CS 39944899: warum löschst Du den offenbar vorhandenen Weg 109879330?
rubcgn (2016-07-02 18:17:42+00:00): Dieser Weg ist seit 2015 gesperrt und als Ruhezone ausgewiesen.
hsc666 (2016-07-02 18:37:52+00:00): D.h. der Weg existiert und darf nur nicht betreten oder befahren werden? Dafür gibt es z.B. den Key "access". Je nach Beschilderung (ich war jetzt grad nicht vor Ort) wird sich dafür ein passendes Tag finden. So, wie es jetzt ist, kann es auf jeden Fall nicht bleiben, da es nicht der Wirklichkeit entspricht. Bei Fragen gib bitte Bescheid!
Владимир К (2016-06-12 09:08:04+00:00): обсуждение ваших ошибок http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=596318#p596318
vibrog (2016-06-20 07:45:10+00:00): Hei, fint om du tar diskusjon om sletting av objekter jeg har tegnet inn først. Jeg reverserer denne editen.
highflyer74 (2016-06-06 14:10:25+00:00): Hello!

Can you try to change the fuel to meet the OSM tagging scheme (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel)?

Also check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/647602031 for the same case.

Gracias!
andreshgodoy (2016-06-06 18:14:26+00:00): Hi :) thank you for the obs. I updated it
highflyer74 (2016-06-06 18:54:40+00:00): Welcome :-)
fkv (2020-12-03 07:44:26+00:00): Weil du die Fortsetzung des Weges 422988584 nach Süden gemappt hast, kannst du das fixme löschen.
Stalfur (2016-06-17 21:19:38+00:00): Don't change names of places into English descriptions!