piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_242798 (2017-02-02 21:44:20+00:00): Overigens:
[leisure=park] staat volledig los van [landuse=*] of [natural=*].
Het zou ook [leisure=nature_reserve] kunnen zijn. 
Of een toponym om de naam toe te voegen.
De tags voor het bodemgebruik ([landuse=*] en [natural=*]) lijken al behoorlijk goed te staan.
Het gaat er alleen om of het hele gebied een park is of een natuurreservaat of....?
En of de hele gebied één naam heeft?
Maar een park kan ook strand/kwelder omvatten. En bos. En water. En wetland. Enz.
Een park veranderen in strand/kwelder/grass/meadow/water/wetland/sand is ook weer fout.
Dat zijn twee verschillende categorieën van tags.
naoliv (2017-01-23 14:04:17+00:00): chdr, esses nomes de rua você obteve de onde?
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-01-13 08:57:48+00:00): Co mělo znamenat :50 v paving_stones:50? To není platná hodnota
Piskvor (2026-01-13 10:29:25+00:00): Viz věk toho changesetu, a ostatní dobové tagy. Tehdy to mělo znamenat, 12 let tomu, že jsou to dlaždice o straně 50 cm. 

Dneska by se to tagovalo jako paving_stones:length=50 cm - viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones#Subtags ; jestli to tam je OTG doteď, to od stolu neodhadnu.

Díky, že ty neobvyklé povrchy reviduješ :)
eggie (2017-07-14 14:15:48+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd.. ooit jaren terug één edit gezet en nu echt begonnen.
DaveF (2020-01-12 20:33:59+00:00): Hi
Quite a while ago it appears you created a polygon city boundary around Carlisle. Can you remember what it was based on? Other administration boundaries, perhaps?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231549499/history

Cheers
DaveF
kreuzschnabel (2019-09-22 15:41:54+00:00): Hi Mani, sind die Tracks im Waldgebiet https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1198/7.8871 ein wenig nach Luftbild geraten? Ich bin die heute mal abgelaufen und das Mapping springt etwas wild zwischen parallelen Wegen hin und her, die in der Höhe 50 m unterschiedlich liegen :) das sieht man auf dem Luftbild natürlich nicht :) :)
dikkeknodel (2019-03-17 20:03:46+00:00): Hi stanton,
I am wondering how a phone you placed [1] about 250m from the actual location of the tunnel improves the tunnel mapping. I seriously doubt that the phone is 250 meters west of the tunnel.
Could you please elaborate?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399338112
stanton (2019-03-17 20:21:00+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,
It’s been a while, therefore it’s hard for me to tell how things looked right after this changeset. Chances are the tunnel was moved afterwards (maybe even by myself) and the phone forgotten.
The main issue is that we don’t have the exact course of the tunnel, it is possible that the tunnel extends further west than currently mapped. The turns were approximated from surveys but may be much sharper. There are two ventilation shafts (I believe that’s what they are, named Aria and Sasso) with overground structures right next to the pass road, currently some 200–300 m west of the tunnel. The tunnel has two niches with these names, which indicates they are right underneath the underground structure. (Though that does not necessarily have to be the case, I know for a fact that the Fréjus tunnel has a ventilation shaft where the overground structure is a few hundred meters from the tunnel.) Bottom line: we need a better estimate of the course of the tunnel.
stanton
dikkeknodel (2019-03-18 19:17:09+00:00): Hi stanton,
Thanks for the fast response. I was at the pass on snow shoes last Saturday, so I did see the Aria structures as well. I mapped some of the hiking routes yesterday. That's when I bumped into the phone in the middle of nowhere. 
May it be a good idea to also move the phone somewhere closer to the OSM location of the tunnel?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
stanton (2019-03-18 19:27:45+00:00): Either that or get the tunnel closer to the phone and ventilation shafts. I have a dash cam video of a trip through the tunnel, and a photo sequence of another (in the opposite direction). I have mapped the Fréjus tunnel in this manner, using the marker lights on the kerb to estimate distances as well as curve radii (based on the number of lights visible before those on the outside disappear behind the inside wall).
stanton (2019-03-19 01:47:47+00:00): OK, just pulled out my video and tried to approximate distances by marker lights (which seem to be some 20 m apart) and odometer readings. There’s still considerable inaccuracy, as the odometer has a resolution of 100 m and some marker lights are missing. In any case, I assumed all turns (there are four throughout the tunnel, two of them right at the portals) to have equal radii, which would make the bearing change directly proportional to the length of the turn. With this I approximated the bearings of the straight segments. The first quarter seems to be quite accurate, as the tunnel gets quite close to the Aria structure. The Sasso structure is still some 200 m away from the calculated position of the tunnel, but the ventilation shaft is not necessarily vertical.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68277209
dikkeknodel (2019-03-19 19:53:34+00:00): Nice work, thanks!
stanton (2019-03-19 21:08:19+00:00): Re ventilation shafts, I just stumbled across these two links:

http://www.standseilbahnen.ch/san-bernardino-aria.html
http://www.standseilbahnen.ch/san-bernardino-sasso.html

Neither ventilation shaft is perfectly vertical. Aria has an inclination of 309.79% and an elevation difference of 354 m. That means the overground structure could be up to 115 m away from the carriageway (less if the shaft is not perpendicular to the carriageway). Sasso has an elevation difference of 318 m and an inclined length of 490 m, which places it within some 370 m of the carriageway. We are well within these limits. In fact I might have slightly overdrawn the curvature of the tunnel, as JOSM tells me it is 6.7 km long when its actual length is 3,596 m.
dikkeknodel (2019-03-20 15:39:35+00:00): You really dive into this. Unfortunately such data cannot be used for OSM.
tyr_asd (2015-08-07 14:32:47+00:00): Vedo che hai mappati seguenti cancelli con "foot=no":
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399590924
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399590936

Sono veramente chiusi anche per pedoni (che sembra strano, essendo parte di una malga e parte del sentiero escursionistico 25A)?

Vedi anche questa nota: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/410012
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-20 09:09:00+00:00): I know that it is really old, but I am confused by tagging scheme used - can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1819251 ?
SPG2LD (2022-01-22 00:42:00+00:00): Hallo
in mehreren Quellen (u.a. Wiki zum Karlstein) ist Hauenstein nicht
der alte Name des Karlsteins sondern der Bergname.
Karlstein wird als  Name des Felsen angegeben.
Viele Grüße
Sven P.
Stefan Karl (2022-01-22 18:18:39+00:00): Hallo Sven, 
aus dem Wikipedia-Eintrag zum Karlstein (Hornberg): "Der Karlstein ist eine Felsenformation und der Gipfel (968,9 m) des Bergs Hauenstein … Der Felsen hieß früher wie der gesamte Berg Hauenstein. Er wurde umbenannt, nachdem Herzog Karl Eugen von Württemberg diesen Gipfel am 23. Juli 1770 bestiegen hatte. …"
Du kannst das natürlich gerne ändern, wenn du bessere Informationen hast.
Viele Grüße
Stefan
M!dgard (2018-03-23 19:59:22+00:00): Met een punt zoals https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399893841, "tourism=information" en "name=Vogelkijkwand", bedoel je dan dat er daar een vogelkijkwand is?
d1g (2015-04-14 01:37:50+00:00): улица Ароновой, 8А - откуда адрес?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231668254/history
BushmanK (2016-05-03 17:05:01+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2400159863/history - обозначайте правильно, пожалуйста
eggie (2018-07-14 15:19:45+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-06-15 02:29:39+00:00): Hi QuangNguyen!
I think this highway tag is properly as highway=residential than road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231678502
So, I changed this highway to residential.
Thank you
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-06-15 02:31:17+00:00): And also this highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231678505
kuhni74 (2026-07-03 12:01:25+00:00): Danke fürs Eintragen der Adressen, aber einige der punktförmigen Identadressen sind als "entrance=yes" getaggt, obwohl sie gar keine Eingänge sind!
kuhni74 (2026-07-03 12:40:10+00:00): habe nun die meisten repariert, aber vielleicht gab es noch weitere Änderungssätze?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:07:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2400328686/history has barrier=g that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier?
luschi (2015-04-04 13:27:36+00:00): perché hai messo access=permissive sulla SS48?
dieterdreist (2023-02-27 13:12:32+00:00): Hello, I noticed you added foot=no to the SS48 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175581384/history 
This is a legal access restriction, and it also extents to implicit sidewalks in villages etc., so it is usually wrong unless it is explicitly signposted or a motorway. There are hiking relations on some pieces (which originate from way splits after your edit here). Do you remember where you have seen a traffic sign like this along this road?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:RomanianTrafficSign_C10-NoPedestrians_2011.svg

Cheers,
Martin
luschi (2023-02-27 17:24:50+00:00): Hi,    
I have checked(Mapillary) the SS48 from `Hotel Lupo Bianco` up to the `Passo Pordoi` and there is no traffic sing that define any access. nothing found about food and nothing about horse
dieterdreist (2023-03-03 13:16:21+00:00): Hi Luschi, thank you for checking and sorry for replying late. It seems the access restriction should be removed, and I have partially done so where the hiking route runs, but there are more (results of way splits) where I am not sure and just added a fixme for the moment. If you are sure they should be removed then please do it, thank you.
Cheers,
Martin
Anonix35 (2023-11-30 12:06:04+00:00): Hi,
I removed the restrictive tags regarding pedestrians and horses. In fact, no sign indicates this.
I also updated the speeds on the SS242 and 48
Andrea
Jolesh (2020-09-10 18:16:14+00:00): Tack för dina bidrag!
I converted the addr=interpolations to tagged buildings/addresses.
rskedgell (2025-08-10 10:37:20+00:00): I realise that this is a changeset from 12 years ago, but is there any reason we really need motor_vehicle=designated on these roads? I think that's implicit on every public road which doesn't have explicitly signed restrictions.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2025-08-10 15:58:59+00:00): Good question: motor_vehicle=designated appears to be one way of saying that the road is specifically for motor vehicles, alongside motorroad=yes and expressway=yes (the latter is a recent trend according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/expressway#chronology). They also seem to be in use on public highways in Madrid according to Overpass Turbo (sorry for long link): https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A250%5D%3B%0A%7B%7BgeocodeArea%3AComunidad%20de%20Madrid%7D%7D-%3E.searchArea%3B%0Away%5B%22motor_vehicle%22%3D%22designated%22%5D%5B%22highway%22%7E%22%5E%28motorway%7Ctrunk%7Cprimary%29%22%5D%28area.searchArea%29%3B%0Aout%20geom%3B&C=40.13713%3B-3.48051%3B8
rskedgell (2025-08-12 17:06:28+00:00): Thanks. I'll leave that alone, in case any data consumers are using it.

I've seen a few instances of people using motor_vehicle=designated to represent "for designated vehicles only", which is actually likely to be motor_vehicle=private
naoliv (2017-01-25 11:06:39+00:00): Roberto, essas edições onde você cita "verificando através de outros mapas e visão da rua", seria exatamente o que?
Usou o Google Street View?
Roberto Costa (2017-01-30 16:20:22+00:00): Naoliv, sim. Usei o Street View, o Bing e em alguns casos foram lugares onde já passei. Mas em grande parte foi através do Street View mesmo, porém como faz bastante tempo que não atualizo nenhuma região, pode estar diferente.
fkv (2016-06-09 13:58:44+00:00): Dass du die Schöberlwarte gelöscht hast, begeistert mich gar nicht. Denn wenn ich sie gestern in der Karte gesehen hätte, hätte ich den kleinen Abstecher von der Waldburgangerhütte zur Warte gemacht, und das wär sicher ein tolles Erlebnis gewesen. Für Betretungsverbote gibt es access=no, und so ein Verbot muss nicht von Dauer sein.
stefanct (2016-06-09 20:35:21+00:00): Ich hab sie nicht gelöscht sondern den viewpoint auf disused gesetzt. Vom Boden aus ist es keine tollen Aussicht und rauf darf man nicht... ergo genau das, was ich getaggt habe.
fkv (2016-06-09 21:10:34+00:00): disused=yes wär ja kein Problem, aber du hast das Maintag entfernt, somit hatte kein Renderer mehr die Chance das Objekt darzustellen. Du hast natürlich recht, dass tourism=viewpoint problematisch ist, wenn Touristen nicht mehr hindürfen. Und man_made=tower hast du nicht gelöscht, es hatte vorher auch schon gefehlt.
fkv (2016-06-20 11:07:55+00:00): Ich hab gestern nochmal einen Abstecher (mit 300 Höhenmeter) zur Waldburgangerhütte gemacht und dort keine Warte gefunden. Nicht mal Fundamente. Da erinnert überhaupt nichts mehr an die Warte. Also hab ich den Node gelöscht.
fkv (2018-10-15 18:36:40+00:00): Ich melde mich nochmal aus einem anderen Grund: Der Name Wanzwiese, wo hast du den her?
stefanct (2018-10-15 19:10:49+00:00): Hi,
pfu... weiß ich nicht mehr und ich hab die Fotos vom Tracken nicht aufgehoben. Aber es kann nur von einem Wegweiser/Karte dort gewesen sein. Direkt vorbei oder drüber gegangen sind wir damals jedenfalls nicht, sondern von der Bodenwiese über die Rohrbacher Lacken zum Rohrbach runter... aber ausgedacht werd ich's mir nicht haben. :)
dieterdreist (2018-03-23 14:20:04+00:00): Hello Bryce, there is an issue with the wetap namespace tags. Tags like wetap:status and object level source tags and wetap:photo should rather be standard tags (to avoid tag fragmentation). The edits I have seen so far are rather old, do you still used these tags?
aceman444 (2015-06-03 20:50:10+00:00): Zdar, co je to "amenity=water" na Node 2401387876 ? Zeby drinking_water?
Jose Riha (2015-06-03 20:57:41+00:00): praveze tato je nepitna. na stanici je kohutik s vodou, ale zrejme to ma sluzit len na rychle omytie ruk, pripadne osviezenie v teplych mesiacoch
aceman444 (2015-06-03 21:07:21+00:00): Tak potom toto: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap ? +drinking_water=no
Jose Riha (2015-06-03 21:16:46+00:00): dakujem, opravil som
Warin61 (2016-11-21 23:41:30+00:00): You have set the width of Wheelbarrow ridge road to 1 ... that is 1 meter width .. you cannot get a car down a 1 meter wide road... reset back to 4 as it was before you changed it.
rustl (2016-11-22 00:47:48+00:00): Just out of curiosity, what editor do you use, the one I use (Potlatch2) doesn't have any mention of width, only type and surface
rustl (2016-11-22 00:48:58+00:00): Sorry update it does have width but I don't set that.
Warin61 (2016-11-22 01:15:51+00:00): I use JOSM.
 According to the history of way 174606310 displayed using JOSM the width was set to 4 on 5/8/12 at 9.01 pm. It was then changed by this changeset 30/7/13 10.29 pm 
I have confirmed this using http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=17152326+
rustl (2016-11-22 05:10:08+00:00): No problem, the track is definitely wide enough for a vehicle.
MarcoR (2016-03-16 09:28:59+00:00): Ciao!

La stazione di ricarica https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2401541794 con ref N.10EP21T2302A000006 risulta nel mezzo di un campo coltivato. Si tratta di un errore di posizione o può essere eliminata?
frosm (2019-06-04 00:30:12+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104936306
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ?
cadsauxk (2015-12-28 12:55:00+00:00): Olá, você editou a Casa dos Queijos como sendo microbrewery=yes (fabricação local e cerveja), tem certeza disto?
BladeTC (2015-12-28 16:30:31+00:00): Cara, sei la, lá é uma lanchonete muito boa e que também vende alguns produtos típicos da região fabricados artesanalmente.
Se considerar outra classificação melhor pode mudar.
Abraços!
cadsauxk (2015-12-28 16:38:57+00:00): Desculpa, mas você não entendeu, a classificação tá beleza. Mas estranhei a tag microbrewery=yes que é para cervejarias que produzem a cerveja no local. Isto é bastante incomum ainda mais para uma "Casa dos Queijos" ;) Só queria confirmar com você a informação, pois me deu a impressão que você deve ter clicado em microbrewery no menu do JOSM sem querer. Abraço.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-11 04:22:03+00:00): Hi. Just noticed this while looking at something else. Is "angel" a local name for life rings such as this? Thanks!
Lübeck (2025-05-28 09:37:02+00:00): I can't understand it anymore and can't explain it at the moment. I'll delete it!
Lübeck (2025-05-28 09:39:27+00:00): know i remember - is a spezial form like https://www.sport-thieme.de/Schwimmen/Schwimmbad-Ausstattung/Rettungsmittel/art=1142118?pe=W19&pe=w31_o31_googlede_pmax_schwimmen&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20496597069&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI5-WW_-7FjQMVpkFBAh2zggCREAQYBiABEgJgkfD_BwE
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-28 23:13:23+00:00): Thanks!
SasazukaSuzuka (2018-02-27 09:59:07+00:00): 現在閉店
pyrog (2024-05-05 14:35:16+00:00): Bonjour Ludo,

Par défaut un highway=path ou highway=track (et bien d'autres) sont autorisés pour les piétons.

Il n'y a donc pas besoin d'ajouter le tag foot=yes.
(En fait ça complique les mises à jour)

Cordialement,
Yves

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231864551
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:13:43+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202177
aceman444 (2019-04-18 22:17:55+00:00): Zdravim, ziadna cyklotrasa "Sered-Hlohovec" nie je na smerovniku v Seredi na hradzi pri Mlynarskej ulici. Je tam ina zelena trasa c.5211. Je Vasa trasa este aktualna? Kde by sa dala overit jej existencia? Alebo uz bola preznacena na inu a tuto bez cisla treba odstranit? Dakujem
SK Cyklo-Tour Sered (2019-04-20 08:57:37+00:00): Ahoj, táto trasa, konkrétne Šintava - Hlohovec popri Váhu bude značená tento rok z TTSK. Trasa, ktorá vedie po hlavnej ceste cez Dvorníky ostáva v pôvodnom stave.
aceman444 (2019-04-28 10:11:29+00:00): Dakujem za info. Potom je ale cudne, ze je trasa v OSM uz 5 rokov, ale zaznacena bude az teraz. Okrem toho trasa s nazvom Sintava-Hlohovec, asi nebude zachadzat do Serede na Mlynarsku ulicu, ako je to teraz zakreslene.
kubahahaha (2022-02-13 18:13:56+00:00): Cześć, pamiętasz może jeszcze co ta relacja miała oznaczać? Myślisz że mogę ją już wykasować?
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-04-29 22:32:12+00:00): I just fixed the tag based on Bing Aerial Imagery
syntex (2022-01-06 15:56:47+00:00): Właściwie to skąd liczba 120 miejsc parkingowych?
pnorman (2016-09-05 05:01:34+00:00): It looks like there's some overlapping data with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232040120
felipeeugenio (2020-05-01 16:16:58+00:00): Hi
this is the third road I find in ten minutes I´ve been editing the zone that you categorized as paved. and it is totally unpaved. Have you visited the zone?
ronic (2020-05-01 20:31:10+00:00): Hi,
yes, I visited the area 6 years ago. But you are right, the right tag should be "compacted".
Greets Robert
Gumeg (2017-06-02 11:14:37+00:00): На улице Разведчиков всего одна полоса?
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-08-27 01:47:24+00:00): Hi QuangDBui@TMA
I added layer=1 on the bridge (way232091507) because it crossed with waterways. Thank you
Warin61 (2015-12-16 03:46:39+00:00): Way 232137774 looks to be way too big!!! 
The area tagged as State Forest has National Parks inside it! 
I will delete this way .. and add data from LPI for the various state forests and National Parks .. smaller areas.
pangoSE (2018-09-11 04:38:40+00:00): Är detta verkligen en kåta? Kanske https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut passar bättre?
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:16:05+00:00): please review way 41526994:
the tag highway=project is rarely used,
I've changed it to highway=proposed,
proposed=motorway.
Please change proposed to construction
if that matches better. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34952761
katpatuka (2015-10-29 16:32:33+00:00): Your tag is ok (as long as it does won't show up on the map) - user erkinalp has created that "proposed" highway 6 years ago but there is no imagery whatsoever showing any built motorway there around...
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:38:57+00:00): I'll ask erkinalp as well
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:42:15+00:00): .. and thanks for the quick feedback :-)
Endres Pelka (2015-01-16 20:29:16+00:00): Jedyne, co ta edycja zrobiła, to usunięcie granicy między mezoregionami. Kwalifikuje się jako wandalizm! Rewertuję.
jerrystef (2015-01-19 19:24:10+00:00): to na pewno była pomyłka i przeoczenie.
user_5359 (2016-06-28 04:16:22+00:00): Hello: You add the tag "Name"with the value "1 Avenida 1 Avenida 1 Agenda". What is the meaning of this tag? Did you know the different possibilities for name: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names ?
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-12 05:28:17+00:00): Is this area still under construction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50845458 specifically)
TheSwavu (2016-06-12 07:32:35+00:00): Not for quite a few years now.

Still needs to be better aligned using NSW LPI imagery.
SK53 (2019-02-03 11:42:00+00:00): You added Bawburgh Road as a name to the track at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232206196. This looks unlikely as it is not heading towards Bawburgh. Current public notices wrt compulsory purchase orders for the Hornsea 3 windfarm power cables at Algarsthorpe all mention Algarsthorpe as being situated to the N of Bawburgh Road. This image of the gate at the S end doesn't show any signs of it being named https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4858464.
Pink Duck (2019-02-03 13:45:15+00:00): It's quite a few years ago I made that edit and I suspect I was going through public notices in the EDP24 newspaper. Interestingly the OS detailed map still shows it as Bawburgh Road. You're right in that both ends now have private gates and there is the disused village of Algarsthorpe between the two other Bawburgh Roads. I can imagine the road from Algarsthorpe through to Bawburgh probably did take a SE path to join to the current southerly one, so it's likely a historic leftover.
SK53 (2019-02-03 15:18:37+00:00): I'd be more persuaded that this is an OS error given that they also show it as a public road; it's not replicated onto the StreetView layers.
Pink Duck (2019-02-03 15:36:50+00:00): I've checked with the county council FOI request for list of streets and matched up the names and ways for Bawburgh Road, which didn't include the one in question. So I've removed the name and source:name tags now and still suspect it's a historic name that OS has kept but that the council no longer recognises.
luschi (2015-02-22 11:13:22+00:00): ist die immer noch construction?
rab (2015-02-22 11:30:42+00:00): Ja leider,
http://www.mobil.hessen.de/irj/HSVV_Internet?rid=HMWVL_15/HSVV_Internet/nav/c8a/c8a30b1f-3ac2-7521-79cd-aae2389e4818,1cd20c70-907b-3941-f012-f312b417c0cf,,,11111111-2222-3333-4444-100000005004%26_ic_uCon_zentral=1cd20c70-907b-3941-f012-f312b417c0cf%26overview=true.htm&uid=c8a30b1f-3ac2-7521-79cd-aae2389e4818
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-17 13:55:50+00:00): Hello,
The names that you have added here looks like the personal name of someone who lives there. If that is the case, please don't do that - see osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-05 16:10:22+00:00): Hello ArielRod,

What was the source of the data in this changeset?

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-05 16:10:36+00:00): Hola ariel rod

¿Cuál fue la fuente de los datos en este conjunto de cambios?

Atentamente,

Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM.
mariotomo (2021-02-24 17:58:47+00:00): Hola ArielRod … en privado me contestaste: »Esos datos fueron extraidos de los mapas topográficos del país.« (podrías ser más específico?  cuáles mapas topográficos?  es una cuestión de licencia, por supuesto.)