piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2023-02-25 09:44:34+00:00): hola. me entero muy tarde de tu contribución, muy útil, y muy buena siendo la primera. espero vuelvas a mejorar la información local, si tienes la oportunidad de observar más establecimientos. 
te sugiero echarle una mirada a StreetComplete, es de gran ayuda para completar (por supuesto) la información presente.
user_2066394 (2022-02-13 11:01:32+00:00): Wo liegt die Hausnummer 1 ?
philipdaubmeier (2022-02-13 11:30:11+00:00): Die Hausnummer 1 der Schreinerstraße ist als Property am Gebäude hinterlegt
user_2066394 (2022-02-13 12:31:37+00:00): Wo genau?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030799186
philipdaubmeier (2022-02-13 14:12:38+00:00): Oh ich hab mich getäuscht, die ist doch nicht hinterlegt. Das neue Gebäude das ich eingezeichnet hab neben der Schreinerstraße 3 ist die Hausnummer 1. Das sieht man auch auf dem Bayernviewer sehr schön. Ich kann das heute Abend wenn ich am PC bin hinzufügen.
user_2066394 (2022-02-13 15:57:00+00:00): Bayernviewer/Bayernatlas ist für Hausnummern leider keine zulässige Quelle für OSM.

In der Karte bereits vorhanden war folgender Adressknoten, den du in der Bearbeitung gelöscht hattest:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8187181463
Der Vorbearbeiter hatte da zwei Gebäude abgrissen und den Adressknoten als Platzhalter eingefügt zur weiteren Verwendung.
philipdaubmeier (2022-02-13 16:55:22+00:00): Das stimmt, Bayernviewer ist keine Quelle. Ich bin vorher auf dem Heimweg eben vorbeigefahren, dort steht inzwischen ein Haus mit Hausnunmer 1, eben das Gebäude was ich von Maxar abgezeichnet habe
user_2066394 (2022-02-13 17:05:20+00:00): Survey vor Ort ist dann sowieso einwandfrei, der Hinweis auf den Bayernatlas war nur prophylaktisch.
Im einfachsten Fall hätte man sogar einfach den vorhandenen Adressknoten liegenlassen können. Übertragen auf Umriss geht aber natürlich auch.
MxxCon (2022-02-14 18:46:06+00:00): Hello.
When it comes to street names, it's best not to abbreviate them. If it's too long, computers can easily figure out how to abbreviate something, but not the other way around. For example is "St." short for Street or Saint.. And there are many other similar ambiguous situations.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117338122
Mod_0range (2022-02-12 23:00:29+00:00): Die Adresse ist ein Ärztehaus mit mehreren Praxen und einer Apotheke.
Die Praxen sind aber voneinander unabhängig, daher würde ich es nicht als (gemeinsam betriebenes) "Ärztezentrum" bezeichnen.
Ist es richtig so?
zvenzzon (2022-04-14 17:47:03+00:00): Misstänker att way 1030807793 kan vara en dublett. Det ser orimligt ut med två 30-vägar alldeles intill varandra, men kan inte avfärda det direkt. Minns ej heller hur det såg ut på plats när jag gick förbi idag heller. Har du möjlighet att kolla hur det ser ut i NVDB och/eller andra källor?
Aerond (2022-04-15 10:18:23+00:00): Både NVDB och Lantmäteriet säger att den är där, mycket möjligt att båda har fel dock.
zvenzzon (2022-04-15 10:22:08+00:00): OK, får försöka komma ihåg att kolla om jag har vägarna förbi. Tack för kollen. mvh
Aerond (2022-04-15 10:38:02+00:00): Det är ganska lätt att kolla sånt med trafikverkets overlays i ID eller JOSM. 

Om något är fel i deras data så kan man rapportera det tror jag, tex vid vägar som har fel namn eller väldigt sneda vägar.

Vet inte exakt vad rätta metoden är men finns säkert nån email på vägverkets hemsida.
Aerond (2022-04-15 17:12:02+00:00): Hittade sidan där man rapporterar NVDB fel: https://www.nvdb.se/sv/kund/avvikelserapportering/?id=48
zvenzzon (2022-08-16 07:59:48+00:00): Undersökte idag. 1030807793 är mycket riktigt en dublett ett tiotal meter parallellt med befintlig way, jag tar nu bort den. Överför relevanta taggar till den vägen som ligger geografiskt närmare "verkligheten" istället.
zvenzzon (2022-08-16 08:02:51+00:00): (Kommer inte undersöka hur det ligger till i NVDB)
zvenzzon (2022-08-16 08:04:15+00:00): Openstreetmap är nu fixat. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124958685
eggie (2022-02-13 07:12:45+00:00): Dag paver.. Je vraagt feedback.

Je zou ook kunnen gebruiken 
landuse=flowerbed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed

en dan historic=memorial met name=... op een  node plaatsen.

Ik heb in ieder geval historic=monument omgezet naar historic=memorial.
Het Engelse vertaling van monument is iets heel anders en niet ons 'monument. 
Denk bv aan de TajMahal in India.  Een grafmonument.. meestal een gebouw.
Gr eggie
Fnkok (2022-02-13 13:19:12+00:00): 道路没拆，为什么删掉？
eggie (2022-02-13 16:17:55+00:00): Dag Freek.. Je vraagt feedback..

Maar hoe zit het nu met de busroutes?
Die lopen deels toch viasa versa.
Daar heb je geen rekening meer gehouden denk ik.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-13 16:31:50+00:00): Drie busroutes hersteld... Aantal lanes hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-13 16:37:09+00:00): Maar Freek  het splitsen is wel keurig gedaan. Die routerelaties maken het allemaal een stuk lastiger.
Mpase,
eggie
Freek_ (2022-02-13 18:15:46+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dank je wel. Daar had ik inderdaad controle voor gevraagd. Fijn dat je het meteen hebt hersteld.
Groet,
Freek
eggie (2022-02-13 18:17:56+00:00): No problem 😀
MarcoR (2022-02-13 08:22:16+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Sei sicura/o che si tratti di un parco cittadino?
A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117339795
fayor (2022-02-13 15:05:06+00:00): Non è assolutamente un parco e non è nemmeno l'unica modifica errata.
SherbetS (2022-04-11 21:27:29+00:00): Thank you for fixing.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-09 16:53:27+00:00): revertido
5m4u9 (2022-02-14 22:02:05+00:00): hola, en lo posible siempre conectar las aceras con alguna vía (calle, psje, avenida). Sino queda aislado y solo queda visualmente bien pero no usable por apps/soft.
5m4u9 (2022-02-14 22:04:38+00:00): el lugar que se conecta podría ser un cruce de peatones o uno que es usado pero no marcado como zebra.

Yo prefiero, romper la vía footway y marcar desde ahí hasta la conexión con la calle como crossing y si no tiene pintura, ponerlo como unmarked. Así podemos conocer que pasos de cebra usados no son mantenidos.
joost schouppe (2025-01-03 13:29:33+00:00): Pusiste unos cuantas service=driveway sobre Nodes
paunofu (2025-01-03 17:03:51+00:00): I don't know why i did that :) gracias por avisar
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 14:03:29+00:00): make sure it's a closed area before tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117341360
ovruni (2022-02-13 04:55:43+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En varios de sus conjuntos de cambios ha agregado el texto " Actualizaciones", sin embargo esto no menciona al resto de la comunidad sobre que han consistido que los cambios. Puede revisar la documentación sobre esto en la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Supaplex (2022-02-13 07:06:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113804037
如果是雙向的道路，不要亂移除 oneway 的標示
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117341914
Glassman (2022-02-14 18:50:23+00:00): #TIP: Typically name should be with leading capitals instead of all caps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117341991
ZLima12 (2022-02-13 05:07:11+00:00): Hi,

For names like this, it is preferred to put them in the official_name tag, rather than the name tag. Please move the name to this tag, if you could.
ZLima12 (2022-03-19 19:16:37+00:00): Still waiting on a reply here. I think this tagging is not correct. Would anyone refer to this road by this name in common conversation? Or would they just say I-95?
jnighan (2022-03-19 22:35:11+00:00): Hi,
I don't believe it is commonly used in conversation. Since "name=I-95" would be incorrect, I'm not sure what the problem with this tagging is? "official_name"=* was created for country names and appears to lack a unified standard for usage. Let me know what you think; we can certainly discuss it in the CT discord as well
ZLima12 (2022-03-19 23:28:00+00:00): I agree, name=I-95 would also be wrong. But if the feature doesn't have an actual name, and is instead mainly referred to by its ref, it shouldn't have a name at all. official_name might have been originally created for that, but it is also used for this purpose in quite a number of places.

I'll join the CT discord if you give me the link, but you should also join the OSM US Discord and/or Slack if you're not in them already.
jnighan (2022-03-19 23:53:56+00:00): Ok! I've messaged the Discord about this. Go to https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ and join # local-connecticut
MikeN (2022-02-13 13:16:58+00:00): Please save changes made in one area before moving to a new area
Trevor_1 (2022-05-01 18:32:28+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why you added this construction area? From the satellite imagery, it appears that it is already complete.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030838725
InsertUser (2022-02-13 22:42:37+00:00): Have you confirmed that the local signage has actually been updated?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117342307
user_115918 (2022-02-16 03:59:02+00:00): Domino's rebranding started in 2012 and was pretty rapid throughout North America. The original suggested Domino's Pizza branding was actually in error. This suggestion has been updated to reflect their current corporate branding and signage. There are some pictures of this store front if you search around, but they cut off the signage so it's hard to tell if they're the legacy branding. They are also pretty old images.
user_5359 (2022-02-14 15:21:45+00:00): Hello, why did you add a underscore for all keys?
user_5359 (2022-02-17 12:55:20+00:00): Please write change comments describing what you changed.
EgerUa (2022-02-17 13:29:21+00:00): This is a Christmas tree.
This object exists only in winter.
In order to exclude the processing and display of this object on the maps, I added an underline for all keys.
I don't want to delete this object because it took a lot of time to create it.
I will remove the underline for all keys before the next New Year holidays.
I hope this small deviation from the rules does not bring big inconvenience to the community.
Let the holiday be at the OSM ...
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:06:10+00:00): You remove 33 Christmas tree every year (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gbB) ? Did you now the wiki page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:xmas:feature ?
By the way, are the buildings in the shape of a Christmas tree or are they real Christmas trees?
EgerUa (2022-02-18 16:28:10+00:00): Yes. I remove and restore these trees every year.
I didn't know about this wiki page.
I will read it and take it into account when creating Christmas trees next New Year.
These are not Christmas tree-shaped buildings.
These are not real Christmas trees.
These are artificial collapsible constructions made of metal and wood, similar to a real Christmas tree.
mueschel (2022-02-19 10:47:18+00:00): It doesn't matter if these are real or artificial trees. Please use the xmas-namespace and don't use underscores to "disable" tags. We do have a set of lifecycle prefixes for this purpose. A tree that has been removed can be tagged as 'razed:' or 'was:'.
wireguy (2022-02-17 13:45:20+00:00): fyi: relation 6001390 is now broken
and
relation 6000806 has dup role members
NFZANMNIM (2022-02-17 15:12:52+00:00): thank you for bringing this to attention. Both issues are addressed and fixed now
user_5359 (2022-02-17 12:58:50+00:00): Hello! What is the reason to add the key aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa with the value of postal_code (in USA the key tiger:zip_left and tiger:zig_right are the agreed standard )
Dr Kludge (2022-02-28 05:54:54+00:00): My keyboard stuck when I was trying to add a postal_code key.  Fixed.
wkdgs (2022-02-15 09:54:00+00:00): Hi,

solche Linien bitte nicht ohne weiteres entfernen.

Ich kenne die Situation vor Ort nicht, aber es sieht sehr danach aus, als hätte jemand bewusst den Lebenszyklus-Präfix verwendet, statt die Gebäude zu löschen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Hier wurden wohl mal Gebäude anhand der Maps4BW-Karte eingetragen, die dort nicht (mehr) existieren. Da die Gebäude aber noch auf der Maps4BW-Karte zu sehen sind, kann es passieren, dass der nächste Mapper die Gebäude fälschlicherweise wieder hinzufügt. Das sollte hier mit dem Präfix und der Notiz verhindert werden.

Das ist jetzt nicht weiter schlimm. Ich denke auch nicht, dass die Linien wieder eingetragen werden müssen. Nur als Hinweis fürs nächste Mal.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117343515
wkdgs (2022-02-15 09:54:17+00:00): Hi,

solche Linien bitte nicht ohne weiteres entfernen.

Ich kenne die Situation vor Ort nicht, aber es sieht sehr danach aus, als hätte jemand bewusst den Lebenszyklus-Präfix verwendet, statt die Gebäude zu löschen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Hier wurden wohl mal Gebäude anhand der Maps4BW-Karte eingetragen, die dort nicht (mehr) existieren. Da die Gebäude aber noch auf der Maps4BW-Karte zu sehen sind, kann es passieren, dass der nächste Mapper die Gebäude fälschlicherweise wieder hinzufügt. Das sollte hier mit dem Präfix und der Notiz verhindert werden.

Das ist jetzt nicht weiter schlimm. Ich denke auch nicht, dass die Linien wieder eingetragen werden müssen. Nur als Hinweis fürs nächste Mal.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117343515
wkdgs (2022-02-15 09:58:01+00:00): Hab jetzt gerade erst gesehen, dass die Linien 3 Jahre alt sind und die Luftbilder schon die neuen Gebäude anzeigen.

Dann macht das natürlich Sinn, diese zu entfernen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117343515
abakus_uploader (2022-02-13 23:31:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Diacritic (2022-02-13 09:50:27+00:00): Hello Supt,

This got flagged on OSMCha as "Crossing Ways".
The way w1030856092 doesn't seem necessary as there is no physical separation there. Similarly, you're modelling of Warren/Homan street has unneeded turn lanes that break routing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117344410
Supt_of_Printing (2022-02-13 12:05:29+00:00): My changes are based on the Maxar Premium Imagery and there are physical separations.
Diacritic (2022-02-13 21:54:34+00:00): Hi Supt,

Yes, I can see that there are new traffic islands at the intersection on the Maxar Imagery. However, the left hand turn from Warren onto the northside of Redman is not physically separated: w1030856092. 

There is also no physical separation that requires w1030856098 or w1030856097; both of those right hand turn lanes create an extra set of intersections that don't exist.
Supt_of_Printing (2022-02-13 22:13:05+00:00): Fair enough, so how would you show it to allow for the various traffic moves?
Diacritic (2022-02-14 06:24:05+00:00): Sorry for the belated reply; I wanted to have a proper look at this on my home computer. :)

There are two options I would suggest:

The first (and best IMO) would be to model this as a regular dual-carriageway intersection. (https://imgur.com/a/DnCXKWe) It's a little bit awkward because the two parts of Homan Street don't align, but modelling the intersection in this way would allow all the required vehicle movements with accurate descriptions: Vehicles continuing on Homan would get a "continue straight" message or similar). Bonus is that this woud make it a lot easier to introduce no_u_turn restrictions where needed.

Alternatively, you could model it as two seperate T intersections. https://imgur.com/a/R0kdHK0 This accounts for the misalignment in Homan Street. Vehicles travelling along Homan would receive a "Turn Right then turn left" message". I wouldn't choose this option, as the turns are so close together to make it a bit unnecessary, but it would easily get the job done if you prefer that as well. :)

Dian

Incidentally, very interested to see the new bridge they are building there. Not sure if you are a local or a tourist there, but I can remember getting stuck in traffic there during summer school holidays!
archpdx (2022-02-13 19:38:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't add these overlapping footpaths on top of roadways. In OSM, we only map foot paths for places like hiking trails and sidewalks. Could you please remove this footpath? If foot traffic is allowed on this stretch, you can split the road by selecting the node it should be split and using the hotkey 'x', then select the road where foot traffic is allowed and select 'yes' for 'Foot' under the 'Allowed Access' field.
Supaplex (2022-02-13 11:37:57+00:00): Hi, it might be a good idea to use rules to modify the English road name. Because according to on-site survey, it might not follow the rules. The section part might appear in the end of the road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345182
Supaplex (2022-02-13 11:38:48+00:00): So, might be more proper to ask local mappers or see street view images to make sure what is the English road name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345182
tomekem_osm (2022-02-16 14:10:40+00:00): I live in Taiwan (New Taipei) for the last 3 years and I don't know the Chinese characters so I actually read English street names around Taiwan a lot.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345182
tomekem_osm (2022-02-16 14:10:50+00:00): I won't rule out there might lack of consistency in some locations, however from my experience the English address format in Taiwan is:
Alley 1, Lane 2, Section 3, Road Name (the first 3 parts being optional).

Please mind there is even no consistency in road names and you can encounter Jhongshan Road (Wades-Giles) and Zhonghan Road (Pinyin), with Pinyin gradually replacing Wades-Giles.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345182
tomekem_osm (2022-02-16 14:10:57+00:00): Actually I have pushed further changes to correct lane part (should be at the front). Would you mind me continuing with such structural changes? Right now Taiwan misses half of the English street names. Actually I'm correcting these names because I wanted to generate English addresses for missing lanes and alleys - it could be done automatically adding the prefix to neighbouring road name. It could greatly increase English address coverage. I agree it might not follow local romanization system in some places.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345182
Supaplex (2022-02-21 03:27:09+00:00): As I mentioned in the message, the local community is not against anything of improving the English road name coverage and quality, but the whole process. We expect some kind of review process, like raising the issue in one of the community channels in Taiwan, the method of how to fix the issue, after the review and might have some mirror adjusting, the have a green light of mass modification. And split the changeset much smaller, a reviewable changeset. If something went wrong, it is possible to fix it due to smaller changeset to spot and to fix.
Ariyama (2022-02-13 08:58:52+00:00): Just check panoramas
Просто проверьте панорамы
Fischkopp0815 (2022-06-05 02:25:30+00:00): Ich denke der Weg ist breiter als width=0 . Bitte prüfe das mal
Elbsolar (2022-06-05 04:54:59+00:00): Ja, dass ist eine Spurbahn mit einer gesamtbreite von ca. 2,50 m.
martien-176 (2022-02-14 14:01:55+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done. The only issue is with the surrounding residential area. It shares a node with a building, while it shouldn't. So always pay attention when drawing these and to keep a gap between their edges.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117345942
archpdx (2022-02-13 19:30:32+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't add these overlapping footpaths on top of roadways. In OSM, we only map foot paths for places like hiking trails and sidewalks. Could you please remove this and others you've added in other changesets?
*Martin* (2022-02-18 17:39:14+00:00): casto nachadzam deotagovane ways od teba hoci JOSM validator na take urcite upozornuje
thailon (2022-02-19 21:32:57+00:00): ake su to deotagovane ways?
*Martin* (2022-02-20 06:45:42+00:00): ciary bez tagov
thailon (2022-02-20 07:16:36+00:00): ah, ok, spravim si query a poopravujem, dik za review.
archpdx (2022-02-13 19:30:48+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't add these overlapping footpaths on top of roadways. In OSM, we only map foot paths for places like hiking trails and sidewalks. Could you please remove this and others you've added in other changesets?
archpdx (2022-02-13 19:30:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't add these overlapping footpaths on top of roadways. In OSM, we only map foot paths for places like hiking trails and sidewalks. Could you please remove this and others you've added in other changesets?
abakus_uploader (2022-02-13 23:31:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!