piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2016-12-25 02:54:09+00:00): Det er generelt bedre at tagge selve bilvejen (Kristtornvej, etc) med "sidewalk=right/left/both" end at tegne fortovene separat, da vores data ellers hurtigt går hen og bliver alt for fnidrede.
mavl (2016-12-25 16:29:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Для остановок вы добавили названия на английском языке (например, "Skver truzhenikov tyla"). Для этих остановок нет общепринятых названий на английском. Вы просто использовали транлитерацию. Транслитерированные названия не нужно добавлять в данные OpenStreetMap. Их всегда можно получить автоматически. Например, маленькая деревня в России не имеет английского названия (никто не называет её по-английски), но Тюмень имеет английское название (Tyumen), также его имеет Москва (Moscow, но не Moskva).  
  
О транслитерации немного написано в статье [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names].  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
piligab (2017-01-26 14:44:19+00:00): Hola charly zaa:
Gracias por contribuir con OSM, he notado que haz hecho un trazo, pero no tiene etiqueta, podrías revisarlo por favor?.
Si no estás seguro de la etiquetas que debe tener, puedes revisar aquí https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
mueschel (2016-12-28 14:24:15+00:00): Hallo,
bitte achte mehr auf die Schreibweise von Keys. Ich korrigiere hier jede Woche Fehler in den Keys wie in opening_houts oder number_of_appartmentsappartments

Jan
gsa (2017-04-18 14:26:02+00:00): Warum wurde der Optiker Pearle gelöscht? Beim Vorbeifahren letzte Woche sah es so aus, als wäre er noch da.
julcnx (2022-08-16 05:54:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571241383/history  what did you mean by highway=turning_circle ? dead-end?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/44655934
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 07:16:46+00:00): Hello.
Can you please remove the additional notes on the tower numbers here? Are you a NGCP lineman making those transmission line and tower edits? If so, you are using your knowledge of those towers as part of your work. If you are using Google Maps Street View, did you verify them on the ground, like when NGCP does line maintenance. I am also adding NGCP transmission lines and towers, however, I can only add tower reference numbers when I see them, because, I am just a mapper here.

When you cannot clean up those tower reference numbers, I will clean them up for you.

Regards,
TagaSanPedroAko
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 07:39:53+00:00): You cleaned up your edits yourself, and  I cleaned up you edits here, plus adding old tower reference numbers based on your previous edits:  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44656975. for now, I know that you are mapping for NGCP, after analyzing most of your previous edits. No need to ask any further questions.
eggie (2017-05-07 07:19:06+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom.. edits in Nederland nu.. dan ook een welkomstmail
Supaplex (2016-12-31 14:38:19+00:00): 您好：

恭喜你完成第一筆編輯，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

一般來說不建議初次編輯的人使用較強大但也容易不小心出問題JOSM來編輯，請先熟悉網頁版的編輯器iD。使用JOSM時請對照OSM Wiki的文件，查詢能夠使用的標籤。

如果有什麼進階的資料想要放到OpenStreetMap上，請洽詢下面列出的溝通管道，與社群講你想做什麼。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群 Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
敬祝畫圖愉快！
Firefishy (2016-12-25 17:23:10+00:00): The paths you added don't seem to match reality much. Please could you take a look at improving them? OSM is a map used by all.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-25 20:59:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This project is about mapping the world as it actually exists - we're very grateful for all of the Pokemon players who've added unmapped footpaths parks and water features in the last few days, especially in places in the world where there aren't many "on the ground" OpenStreetMap editors.

Some people, however, have been making questionable edits, and your changes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461653937 seem to fall into that category. If you want your edits to stay in OpenStreetMap, please only map things that actually exist. Many parts of the USA have lots of unmapped features like this so there really are a lot of real things.

If you continue to add obviously fake things to OpenStreetMap you'll be prevented from editing it in the future.

I'd also suggest changing your user name from "paigesmells234" to something a bit more sensible.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
geri-oc (2016-12-25 07:44:56+00:00): Bitte unterlasse das name=* an alles zu taggen. Wie es geht habe ich schon mehrmals gezeigt.
geri-oc (2016-12-25 07:42:24+00:00): Ist das wieder ein Gasthof?

ansonsten loc_name=*
Владимир К (2017-04-04 08:10:45+00:00): это ведь высота этой горы, а не название, так?
geri-oc (2016-12-25 07:40:25+00:00): Bitte ändere die name=* an Gebäuden in ref=* oder operator=*.
geri-oc (2016-12-25 07:56:13+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=623878#p623878
Tomas Straupis (2016-12-25 11:38:39+00:00): Šis ir kiti pakeitimai atšaukti. Kristijono Skrytės crap.me paskyra perduota blokavimui.
geri-oc (2016-12-25 07:41:15+00:00): Siehe bisherige Kommentare zu name=* an Gebäuden.
Владимир К (2017-04-04 06:04:31+00:00): десятичный разделитель в числах должен быть точкой, а не запятой. Из-за этого рендер думает что в тэге ele два значения высоты и не выводит его на карту. Также, не нужно писать в название "г." или "гора"
kreuzschnabel (2016-12-25 18:19:50+00:00): Da haben wir ja einen fleißigen Mitmacher bekommen. 260 Änderungssätze in einer Woche, das ist schon ne Hausnummer. 
Aber bitte halte dich an die üblichen Gepflogenheiten, die du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice nachlesen kannst (ist deutsch). Insbesondere soll im name-Feld wirklich nur der Name eines Elements stehen, keine allgemeine Beschriftung oder Bezeichnung. Und es fällt mir schwer zu glauben, dass dieser Feldweg „Schulweg Paulshain-Paulsdorf“ heißt. Das ist eher eine Beschreibung, oder? Ein anderer OSM-Grundsatz ist „Ein Objekt – ein Element“. Baumschule Schurig sollte mit einem Element abgebildet werden (das kann das Gelände sein, oder im einfachsten Fall ein einzelnstehender Node mittendrin), aber nicht mit fünf einzelnen Gebäuden. Grund: Wer in der Datenbank danach sucht, bekommt unnötig viele Treffer, das verwirrt nur. Es gäbe noch mehr „anzumeckern“, aber ich will dir natürlich nicht gleich am Anfang die Lust verderben. Es wäre aber gut für alle, wenn du auf Kommentare reagieren würdest, ob sie nun per Mail oder als Changesetkommentare (wie dieser hier) daherkommen. Wir Mapper wollen alle miteinander im Gespräch sein :-)
pesec (2016-12-26 05:57:10+00:00): не жилой комплекс, а Жилой квартал.
pesec (2016-12-26 05:58:31+00:00): Отдалённые друг от друга объекты правки лучше разделять на отдельные пакеты.
user_242798 (2017-01-25 20:10:16+00:00): Weideveldselaan:
traffic_sign=NL:C1; 'uitgezonderd brandweer'.
Dus: Gesloten in beide richtingen voor voertuigen, ruiters en geleiders van rij- of trekdieren of vee.
Dan is [highway=tertiary] onjuist.
Ook Osmose heeft bezwaar:
Bad topology way level 3 
A way connects directly to the street classification much smaller. 
De tertiary kan nooit eindigen op een service (brug, verbinding met Portugalweg) en zeker niet op een lift_gate.
In dit geval uitsluitend toegang voor de brandweer, dus toegangsweg, dus [highway=service] + [service=driveway] + [access=private]. (private is in dit geval: brandweer).
user_242798 (2017-01-25 20:18:39+00:00): Please do not put a footway on top of a cycleway (parallel to Weideveldselaan).
Resulting errrors: duplicated ways, crossing ways, overlappig ways.
Please do use: sidewalk=left/right/both.
Or: [foot=yes] on cycleway if cycleway is the only option for foot access (in which case foot is allowed on a cycleway).
Here is only one highway. Access is set by access tags and default values for access for a specific highway type.
PT-53 (2020-09-25 06:26:13+00:00): Hallo  sulagaloh,
im OSM-Inspector werden u.a.für diese Flächen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461666537/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461666536/history
Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.89306&lat=47.67925&zoom=16&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags

Kann man das löschen oder ergänzt Du noch die fehlenden Merkmale?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:56:20+00:00): erledigt
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 19:39:04+00:00): Hi monaliki, I appreciate your intention to improve the map, thank you! I'm not convinced that this change does improve things, though.

Take a look at http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44658345. If you hover over each object you deleted (in red), you'll see that it had a lot of details about that part of the building. Taken together, those separate buildings were meant to represent the details of the single building you redrew, and your redrawn building is missing those details.

Also, I notice that although your redrawn building is aligned with Bing imagery (good!), everything else nearby is not. One result is that your drawn building overlaps some trees and other objects, and its distance from neighboring buildings and roads is probably a bit wrong now. I think this area needs someone very experienced in OSM and GIS to reconcile the drawn objects with the Bing imagery -- who knows at this point which one is more correct?

So I think we need to undo your changes, returning the former drawn, detailed buildings. Let me know what you think, and I can get your edit reversed.

Thanks,
David
monaliki (2016-12-26 02:17:51+00:00): Whoops! Thanks for bringing this up. I'm kinda new to this, and was unaware there was all that other info in there. Sorry for the mess!

I do still want to try turning it into an area object again though, as it was bugging me how that building was the only one among its neighbors that wasn't colored in on the map... There probably is an easier way to accomplish this that I've yet to learn, but I'm sure that whatever it is, doing so would be miles easier with the old tags and positioning back to how they were originally. So I'm all for a reversal of my edit! I hope it won't be too much trouble. Thank you!
DavidKewley (2016-12-26 02:59:27+00:00): Aloha monaliki, I've undone this changeset. As far as how to fix the problem you noticed (the building not being colored on the final rendered map), take a quick look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part. Mapping a complex building is advanced OSM; I've not done it myself, and I'm not suggesting you should study it or attempt it. But looking briefly at that article, and at neighboring buildings in Hilo, it looks like the proper way to get this building colored in is the following: After all the building parts are mapped, make one big outline that includes all the (contiguous) building parts, and give it a building=yes or building=hotel or other appropriate building=* tag. That should make the entire building get colored in. Want to give that a try with this building? Look at the nearby Hilo Hawaiian Hotel, which is done this way already (although the precisely overlapping outlines may not be easy to notice). Let me know when you're done and I'll take a look. Or let me know if you'd rather I do it. Mahalo! Former Maui resident, David P.S. Let's ignore the image vs. object alignment for now -- that's another advanced topic for later. Meanwhile don't worry about it, and feel free to do your best in this area!
monaliki (2016-12-26 09:35:44+00:00): Thank you for the guidance, David! I just took a swing at adding in the all-encompassing building area. I think it scratched my itch!
... But before doing that, I had to make a few modifications before "soft locking" the building (as in, I felt like it'd probably get more tedious to modify the overall shape of the building when there's an extra area wrapped tightly around it). I'll detail what else I changed here, so when you take a look at it, you don't have to guess too much about what went down.

- The southern "arm" of the building was far too short, so I extended that. (Just an approximation. Misaligned map woes!) I also set its roof:levels value to .5, as it's taller than the nearby roof already defined as .25, but shorter than the one defined as 1. I feel like these values are still off, but I didn't want to mess with them too much.
- The central area's gabled roof was sticking out beyond the southern edge, when in reality it seems to fall slightly short instead, so I shortened that.
- Things may have shifted slightly when I squared them after such adjustments as well.
- There's a smaller section of building at the end of the southern arm that's not a gabled roof like the majority of it, so I added another line shape to define that part. I wanted to make this new shape as much like the other building pieces as possible, so I started by adding all the same tags to it as well. Referring to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings#Roof, I couldn't find a roof:shape type that could describe something half pyramidal and half flat, so I just used the same value that was used for the similar roof on the other side of the building--hipped, even though I don't think this is quite it either.
- And that's also when I saw that all parts of this building were tagged with lightgray gravel roofs and beige concrete walls. I could see this being applicable to the three larger sections of the building containing all the rooms, but definitely not to the frontal areas with the blue ridged roofs and planked walls. So besides modifying the roof and wall attributes for the new shape I added, I also modified them for the other similar places where the old values seemed unreasonable.
- Shifted the pool slightly so it was more centered between the existing buildings.

I think that's about it. I fell down a bit of a rabbit hole and ended up doing a bit more changes than originally intended, but I hope it's still mostly okay! Mahalo for all your help and encouragement!
DavidKewley (2016-12-26 19:54:11+00:00): monaliki, this is really awesome, thank you! I hope you had fun going down the rabbit hole, learning about 3D building modeling in OSM and improving the roofs and colors and other details. Now you know more than I do about this, and you have skills you can apply to other buildings! This is a great example of improving the map. :) Have fun, and mahalo! David
monaliki (2016-12-27 04:57:32+00:00): Haha, it was very satisfying to bring a piece of the map closer to completion! Even if I may have only scratched the surface of OSM, I still learned a lot trying it out. I look forward to contributing more! Thanks for all your support, and you have fun too! :)
Omar Federer (2016-12-25 09:47:35+00:00): and Dr TAIBI Reda
freebeer (2018-05-12 05:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58894472 where the changeset comment is: Delete obviously bogus maps.me personal info / shelter spam
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-23 07:48:16+00:00): Hi HSH Team, most of the service roads mapped are actually residential roads. Also, the "service=alley" will be used only if it's usually located between properties to provide access gardens, back entrances. Please read this for a quick understanding https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley. Let me know if you need help.
user_5359 (2016-12-26 20:30:03+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Mal davon abgesehen, dass der Weg wohl nicht als Fußweg benannt ist sondern dies eher eine Beschreibung ist: Warum ghet der Weg quer durch das Gebäude?
souang (2022-02-28 01:29:31+00:00): Ngeruling: Incorrect spelling
Ngeruliang: Correct spelling
hanzlan (2022-02-28 08:33:11+00:00): Thank you very much. I was using the name from geonames.org "Ngeruling Hamlet", which is incorrect then. I will change it :-)
https://www.geonames.org/4038130/ngeruling-hamlet.html
souang (2022-02-28 09:45:40+00:00): Thank you for the prompt attention to this. I have been submitting change suggestions on Google maps for years but some of them just won’t budge. Thank you for bringing that org to my attention as well.
hanzlan (2022-02-28 09:53:26+00:00): Thank you for your fast reply too. I am pretty active on mapping in Palau at the moment as there are still many islands without any names  and detailed maps of Palau are scarce. Toponymy is quite hard as it cannot be seen from satellite imagery, so it's good to have you with local knowledge :)
pesec (2016-12-26 05:54:34+00:00): Не жилой комплекс (это здание), а Жилой квартал. Поправьте.
mavl (2016-12-27 05:02:37+00:00): Здравствуйте, anpk.  
Здравствуйте, pesec.  
  
pesec, напишите, пожалуйста, почему вы думаете, что этот микрорайон называется именно «Жилой квартал «Суходолье». Его обычно называют жилой комплекс (например, [http://www.sova72.ru/nedvizhimost/otzastrojshhika/kompleks/105]). Я бы сказал, что это обычный микрорайон. Если у него нет официального статуса, то нам не нужно придумывать для него этот статус. Мы можем назвать его просто name=Суходолье.
Commodoortje (2016-12-25 19:56:34+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-25 19:59:38+00:00): Er kunnen een paar verbeteringen worden doorgevoerd.
Je hebt op dit moment een (betonnen) vlak gemaakt als pedestrian.
Tevens is aan de Oostzijde reeds een fietspad aanwezig, deze zal gedeeld worden met het door je aangebrachte voetpad. 
Mocht je willen weten hoe je dit kunt oplossen reageer dan even.
Geim (2016-12-29 18:26:04+00:00): Ik heb "pedestrian street" gewijzigd in "proposed" om het grijze vlak van de kaart te krijgen. Als je e.e.a. hebt aangepast kun je dit weer terug wijzigen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-29 20:11:42+00:00): Is highway=footway geen betere tagging?
Geim (2016-12-31 14:43:54+00:00): Goed mogelijk, maar dat is aan Marcel. Voetgangersgebied is het zeker niet.
PT-53 (2020-09-28 07:24:29+00:00): Hallo  sulagaloh,
im OSM-Inspector werden für diese Flächen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461676741/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461676208/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461676739/history
Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.89494&lat=47.67644&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:42:17+00:00): erledigt
bielebog (2017-01-13 12:15:59+00:00): Der Fuß-/Radweg entlang der Josefstraße ist zwar fertig aber momentan noch nicht beschildert. Insofern passt das designated=* noch nicht. Hab das geändert und ein Auge drauf.
mueschel (2016-12-28 14:39:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check this building?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461677093
The tag "957 =753" looks strange.

Cheers, Jan
u_kubota (2017-01-04 00:54:01+00:00): Thank you for your comment.
This tag was given with an erroneous operation, it is not intentionally added.
So I deleted it.
surveyor54 (2016-12-26 15:08:07+00:00): Hallo hauseinmessung,

willkommen bei OSM.
Auf welcher Grundlage basierend änderst du hier bestehende Grenzen?

Gruß
surveyor54
hauseinmessung (2016-12-26 19:11:00+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,

die entsprechenden bisherigen Gemeindegrenzen entsprachen weder topologisch noch geometrisch der Realität. Ich würde gern in den kommenden Tagen auf Basis des amtlichen Datensatzes des LVermGeo zu den Gemarkungen die Grenzen für Göttnitz und Löbersdorf und natürlich der angrenzenden Ortschaften anpassen. Mir ist klar das der jetzige Bearbeitungsstand nicht zufriedenstellend ist; jedoch war es für mich einfacher die fehlerhaften Grenzen zunächst zu löschen als zu bearbeiten. Falls es dennoch ein Problem mit dieser Vorgehensweise gibt, bitte einfach melden. Wie schon festgestellt, ich bin neu hier und dankbar für jeden Hinweis.

Beste Grüße!
DD1GJ (2016-12-26 22:34:22+00:00): Hallo Hauseinmessung,

lies Dir bitte zuvor die derzeitigen Nutzungsbedingungen des LVermGeo durch und stelle dann betrübt fest, dass Dein Vorhaben dagegen verstößt:

https://www.lvermgeo.sachsen-anhalt.de/MediaLibrary/Content/de/kontakt/wir_ueber_uns/nutzungsbedingungen/Nutzungsbedingungen.pdf

Einige andere Bundesländer sind da etwas großzügiger.
hauseinmessung (2016-12-27 17:31:53+00:00): Zunächst einmal vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Ich denke, gerade diese Zusammenarbeit zeichnet das OSM-Projekt aus. Zu den Bedenken ich könnte gegen die Nutzungsbedingungen des LVermGeo verstoßen, möchte ich nochmal auf meinen vorherigen Kommentar verweisen: "...auf Basis des ..." und ergänzen, dass es sich bei den neuen Gemeindegrenzen natürlich um ein eigenschöpferisches Werk im Sinne des UrhG versteht (durch Generalisierung etc).
DD1GJ (2016-12-27 23:38:37+00:00): Vergangenen Monat hatte sich eine andere Landesvermessung offiziell beschwert, weil jemand "auf Basis des Geoportals" einige Hausnummern  übernommen hatte. Bei OSM gilt der Grundsatz "Nicht von anderen Karten abmalen", wenn dies nicht ausdrücklich erlaubt ist und unabhängig gegengeprüft wurde. Deine einzige Chance ist, eine amtliche Bekanntmachung über die Gemeindegrenzen zu finden. Diese wäre dann gemeinfrei.
trigpoint (2016-12-25 13:43:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a map in which we map what exists in the real world. Please do not retag objects for your own purposes, this is considered vandalism.
I have reverted your changes as neither are parks.
opendcc (2016-12-26 08:46:59+00:00): Hallo,

ist dieser Radweg baulich von der Fahrbahn getrennt? Wenn nein, dann einfach als lane an die Straße taggen.
Supaplex (2016-12-25 13:25:21+00:00): 新增的便利商店有名字嗎？
Supaplex (2016-12-31 14:41:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2017-10-19 09:25:02+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
mavl (2016-12-25 13:22:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44638396, 44638411, 44638765, 44638784, 44638809, 44638862, 44652986, 44653397, 44653604.
mavl (2016-12-25 13:27:58+00:00): Sorry, the main changeset comment is wrong. The real main changeset comment is "The changesets of the user bigb0b are reverted."
Commodoortje (2016-12-26 07:47:45+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-26 07:58:52+00:00): Vraagje: Loopt het aangebrachte bospad dood? Of loopt deze nog langs het spoor op?
Het aangebrachte bankje heb ik inmiddels omgezet naar een betere tagging.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:amenity%3Dbench
vademecum (2017-01-08 00:08:24+00:00): Bitte füge keine Phantasienamen von Pokemons in existierende Kartenelemente ein. Du verfälschst die Daten in der Datenbank, Vandalismus ist hier nicht erwünscht.
highflyer74 (2016-12-26 10:27:29+00:00): Moin!

Guck' mal eben hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571607859. Irgendwie steht der da so alleine herum, mit seinem level=0...

Gruss aus HB!