piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2018-02-12 05:08:55+00:00): tree deleting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53608942
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:02:10+00:00): Please, don't do this.
As far as I know these cities don't have a Serbian name.
Read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration before adding more transliterated names.
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
Branko Kokanovic (2017-11-08 17:02:06+00:00): Didn't know about this rule. Sorry and thanks for reverting it for me!
naoliv (2017-11-08 17:03:27+00:00): Sure, no problem.
If you have any doubts just send a message.
eggie (2017-11-08 13:05:58+00:00): Tip: ... power=  substation  
Node Area  Onderstation 
Onderstation of transformatorstation. 
Kan ook op de adresnode erbij.
Utrechter (2017-11-08 19:28:04+00:00): Dankje voor de tip. Is alleen power= substation voldoende of is het handig om ook onderstation/transformatorstation in de omschrijving te zetten?
eggie (2017-11-08 19:48:35+00:00): In de description kun je dat rustig laten staan. Dat is extra info.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Nakaner (2017-11-11 12:16:37+00:00): Hallo Chrysopras,

danke, die community_centre=*-Tags für Gemeindehäuse kannte ich tatsächlich noch nicht und habe sie prompt auf mir bekannte angewendet. Hast du sie mit Taginfo gefunden? Im Wiki sind die Werte für Gemeindehäuse nämlich nicht richtig dokumentiert (ich habe sie zumindest nicht gefunden).

Viele Grüße

Michael
Chrysopras (2017-11-11 16:41:54+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,

im Wiki ist immerhin schon das Tag community_centre=parish_hall dokumentiert, aber schwer zu finden, nämlich unter
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre. Das etwas allgemeinere Tag community_centre:for=religious
habe ich über Taginfo gefunden.

Da letztzeres einigermaßen oft verwendet wird, habe ich immer beide Tags angegeben, da sie sich mMn immerhin nicht widersprechen und unterschiedliche „Auswertungstiefen“ abdecken: community_centre:for=religious als allgemeines Tag für religiöse Gemeinschaftszentren (würde ja z.B. auch auf die Sozialräume einer Moscheegemeinde oder einer jüdischen Gemeinde passen) und zusätzlich community_centre=parish_hall für den Spezialfall „Gemeindehaus einer christl. Kirchengemeinde.“

Eigentlich sollte man community_centre:for=religious in die Wiki-Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre:for einfügen, dort fehlt es noch, obwohl es schon häufiger verwendet wird als einige dort dokumentierte Werte.

Viele Grüße, Chrysopras
user_5359 (2017-11-08 19:59:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422552741/history? You entry is a duplicate entry.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-08 13:14:24+00:00): een node bij nr 18 ontbrak nog. Belangrijker is te weten dat wij in OSM géén parallelvoetpaden tekenen. Dit help te routering om zeep. Je "mag" alleen een parallelvoetpad aanbrengen als er een groenstrook tussen het trottoir en de rijbaan zit. In alle andere gevakllen laat je het weg. je kunt immers overal van het trottoir de rijbaan opstappen en naar de overkant gaan.
Zou je kunnen nagaan waar dat het geval is... anders was het in ieder geval een goede oefening. :)
Dus groenstrook er tussen.. footway geen probleem. Niets ertussen... weghalen. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt .. stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-11-08 13:16:22+00:00): Je kunt wel aan een hoofdrijbaan toevoegen naast highway=residential... footway=both, left, right. (let dan wel op de richting van de weg) Het wordt niet veel gedaan.
eggie (2017-11-08 13:17:38+00:00): In Almere heeft mapper Vistaus overal van die paden aangebracht zonder enige verbinding. Helaas reageert hij nooit.
Genoeg reparatiewerk daar.
eggie (2017-11-08 13:51:57+00:00): Het is trouwens sidewalk=  both / left / right / no  Way  Trottoir 
(Foutje van mij)
Specificeert dat de weg trottoirs aan beide zijden heeft, aan één zijde of helemaal geen trottoirs.
Die tag zet je dan op de rijbaan voor auto's.
Meestal dus sidewalk=both

(Het rendert niet op alle kaarten)
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
literan (2017-11-09 09:22:59+00:00): еще раз попытаетесь рекламную фразу вставить - вообще точку удалю.
модныймастер (2017-11-09 09:25:00+00:00): Не нарочно. Поясните что является рекламной фразой?
literan (2017-11-09 09:34:17+00:00): любые оценочные и субъективные суждения
модныймастер (2017-11-09 09:39:40+00:00): Принять к сведению. Спасибо.
literan (2017-11-09 09:37:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. landuse=forest это лесные плантации, посадки под срубку. К тому же вы заливаете этим тегом все кварталы целиком,включая крыши домов (очевидно, что на крышах лес не растет - здесь надо тщательно прорисовывать, делать мультиполигоны). Поэтому эти некорректные полигоны я удалю.
Mr_Blackbird (2017-11-09 14:15:15+00:00): При разметке лесистой области я опирался на работу мапперов в Архангельске, где многие жилые кварталы покрыты лесистой территорией именно так. Тег, конечно, использовался другой - "natural=wood", признаю. Что вы об этом думаете?
literan (2017-11-09 14:23:39+00:00): natural=wood - правильно. Но в любом случае, не следует скопом весь квартал покрывать.
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
aceman444 (2020-11-08 15:54:56+00:00): Hi, are you sure about the concrete surfaces on roads in Dunajska Streda? Roads in cities in Slovakia (especially major ones that you have touched here) are covered with asphalt. Have you mixed concrete with asphalt here?
santamariense (2017-11-08 23:35:22+00:00): Oh! Thanks for fixing. Good job!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-08 13:59:15+00:00): Oke... en wil je toch een parallelvoetpad taggen... dan dus op de rijbaan zelf. met sidewalk=both  of lef/right  of no
Elke weg heeft een richting (niets met oneway te maken) Dat bepaalt links of rechts. Klink onlogisch.. maar soms is left dus rechts in je idee.
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 14:54:28+00:00): This seems to be an automated or semi-automatic  remote edit. Can you please disclose your sources? I have found some problems with railway stations flagged as light rail while they seem to be real train stations.
Zverik (2017-12-13 15:14:45+00:00): This is a result of a stop_area creating script, that collected stations + platform + entrances in stop_area relations. Every change was manually checked by me in JOSM, and there were some extra edits. There were no external sources. If I broke something, please show me. I assume I marked stations as light_rail, because light rail routes stop at these.
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 15:22:41+00:00): Hello Zverik, thank you for replying so fast.
Was this an announced / discussed edit? Your approach seems broken, because with station=light_rail you define the railway=station to be a light rail station, but you should take into account that some/many of the stations are light_rail AND normal rail stations at the same time (same OSM object).
On the stations I have checked and fixed in Rome I have changed "station=light_rail" to "station=train" and added light_rail=yes if they were also served by light rail.
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 15:23:54+00:00): forget the part about the "discussed announced", as you checked them individually it is not a requirement of course.
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 15:26:23+00:00): Basically, most railway routes are missing in OSM (although most light rail routes are mapped), so you cannot rely on OSM data to check whether it is a railway station or a light rail station.
Zverik (2017-12-13 15:34:59+00:00): I agree, and I usually check whether there are railway=light_rail tracks through the station. For this city I probably looked at the route relations and thought that there are no regular trains through these stations.
Zverik (2017-12-13 15:35:58+00:00): Of course I'll be more careful next time when retagging station types. Sorry for this.
dieterdreist (2017-12-13 21:34:48+00:00): you’re welcome.
I have not performed any fixes in Spain as I don’t know the situation, I only searched for some example connections on the national railway website. It would be good to inform the local community that they should check their stations.
In Rome in the meantime I’ve found regular regional train routes retagged in error as light rail routes 8 months ago by an armchair mapper.
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 10:36:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53611454
kot europejski (2017-11-21 11:20:23+00:00): Witam, dlaczego zmieniłeś amenity=music_school na  amenity=school?
maraf24 (2017-11-21 23:48:09+00:00): Gdyż tak właśnie taguje się w Polsce państwowe szkoły muzyczne, czy ogólniej: szkoły zapewniające edykację na poziomie podstawowym i średnim i spełniające wymogi MEN w zakresie takiego kształcenia.
naoliv (2018-03-08 17:56:10+00:00): Oi, Igor.
Em geral não abreviamos nomes no OpenStreetMap.
Por exemplo, ao invés de colocar "Conj. Hab. Jardim Joia do Tronco" nós usamos o nome completo, como "Conjunto Habitacional Jardim Joia do Tronco".
O mesmo é válido para nome de ruas ou outros tipos de objetos.
O nome completo é importante para evitar ambiguidade na interpretação das abreviações, principalmente.
IgorEliezer (2018-03-08 19:57:46+00:00): Olá, naoliv.

Obrigado por dar uma olhada nas minhas edições. Vou fazer as alterações nos bairros.

Quanto às vias, isso já tem sido feito (no osmcha, pesquise "nome completo").
naoliv (2018-03-08 20:04:01+00:00): Os nomes dos bairros e conjuntos eu já corrigi.
O nome das ruas acabou sendo apenas um exemplo :-)
Abraço!
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jul14n (2017-11-08 14:01:12+00:00): JOSM scheint die Beschreibungen nur jedes zweite Mal zu ändern. Gemeint ist die 601.
Palolo (2022-12-07 16:55:10+00:00): Do you have a better location for these schools please? There doesn't appear to be buildings at these locations. Thank  you.
naoliv (2017-11-08 16:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53614950 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic Serbian names transliteration Unless you are sure that the place has a Serbian name, you should not add automatic translated/transliterated names to places. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration and discuss with the community before adding more names like this.
Jrachi (2022-03-06 11:18:47+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito in questo percorso i tag 
ref=408
osmc:symbol=red:red:white_stripe:408:black
symbol:it=408 su bandierina bianca e rossa
symbol=408 on white red flag
che però andrebbero messi solo sulla relazione del percorso a catasto ECNC4080000
Dai dati alla SOSEC risulta essere molto più lungo e non è inserito in OSM.
Mi aiuti a capire come risolvere?

Ivo, Jrachi
Angelo Giuseppe (2022-03-06 16:51:48+00:00): Come Cai Seregno ogni anno facciamo sentieri del Roero, che prendiamo da guide stampate della zona.
Il sentiero è "il sentiero dell'acino" che viene provato dai responsabili gite e poi percorso con la gita.
nel 2017 non c'erano riferimenti catastali e le relazioni si facevano così.
I cartelli facevano il percorso relazionato.
Ti allego sito in cui si vede  che il percorso è coerente con quanto fatto.
http://www.langheroero.it/itinerari-outdoor/escursioni-in-famiglia---guarene-e-castagnito-sent

Sentiti libero di modificare la relazione secondo le regole attuali, prova il percorso fisicamente e se realmente è cambiato, sentiti libero di modificare anche quello.
Grazie e Buon Lavoro
Angelo
Angelo Giuseppe (2022-03-06 17:07:42+00:00): https://www.visitlmr.it/en/route/trekking/family-outings-sentiero-dellacino
Anche in questo sito è coerente.
Jrachi (2022-03-06 18:41:21+00:00): Scusa. Ma non ci siamo capiti.
Intendevo che i tag ref vanno sulla relazione del percorso completo e non sui percorsi che hanno parti in comune.
Il percorso "Sentiero dell'acino" non può avere lo stesso tag.
Comunque prendo in parola la tua richiesta di aggiornare i percorsi a catasto e quindi correggere i percorsi come questo.
Ivo, Jrachi
eggie (2017-11-08 15:29:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Constable (2017-11-09 08:25:29+00:00): ancora con queste modifiche?! perché inserisci la mail nei tratti di sentiero che mappi?
inoltre, i nomi dei sentieri non si mappano così. Quel nome va in una relazione che comprende tutti i tratti di quel sentiero, non devi inserirlo su tutti i sentierini che formano il sentiero "desenzano-manerba".
Per favore dai un segno di vita e smettila di mappare senza ascoltare i consigli che ti vengono dati. Siamo una comunità di mappatori, non ha senso mappare ognuno a modo suo.
constante (2017-11-09 13:20:48+00:00): ok sono all'inizio chiedo scusa il mio prossimo sentiero sarà completo non a pezzettini