piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
philippec (2021-09-05 11:48:08+00:00): Mechelen fietspad Stenenmolenstraat, waarom access = no ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/filipc?focus=map&pKey=912605602688479&lat=51.010609950885964&lng=4.476554291929006&z=16.85713081928125&x=0.5000000000000026&y=0.5053793623530154&zoom=0&dateFrom=2021-08-01&username%5B%5D=filipc
philippec (2021-09-05 11:50:00+00:00): Er zijn nog meer fietspaden bijgekomen.
SPQRobin (2021-09-06 10:54:19+00:00): Ik weet niet waar de access=no staat of stond, dat zal wellicht onbedoeld overgebleven zijn van voor de openstelling.
mc-osm (2021-09-05 11:14:11+00:00): Da u pravu si. Hvala sto si vratio/vratila ime ulice. Ocigledno je pogresno i u google maps. A i poruka:

"Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: Right name of those streets is 'Djordja Stanojevica'.
Created by Pan Perníček 4 days ago
Location: 44.8066821, 20.4086280"

Nisam uradio sto treba u takvom slucaju: "Idi i pogledaj svojim ocima"

:-)

Pozdrav, mc-osm
TXBG (2021-09-05 13:06:53+00:00): Verovatno se mogu još negde videti table sa nazivom Đorđa Stanojevića tako da ni to više nije merodavno. Generalno, Beograd je dobro urađen što se ulica tiče i treba dobro proveriti pre izmena. Pozdrav
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110743073
jodd (2022-06-26 17:48:42+00:00): Hallo fkMohr,

ich bin heute auf dem in OSM kartierten Wanderweg RTK-Weg 7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/310353 gewandert. Dabei habe ich mich gefragt, ob dieser Wanderweg überhaupt noch unterhalten wird. An einigen Stellen scheinen sowohl vor Ort als auch in OSM markierte Wegabschnitte gar nicht mehr zu existieren.

Du bist ja Wegemarkierer und kennst dich offenbar gut aus. Weißt du, wie der Stand beim RTK-Weg 7 ist?

Konkret zu diesem Changeset habe ich eine Frage:

Der way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35933015 scheint nicht mehr unterhalten zu werden. In diesem Changeset von vor 10 Monaten hast du diesen aber noch angepasst. Hat sich die Nutzbarkeit des Weges in dieser Zeit vielleicht geändert und der Weg muss jetzt mit abandonned:* getaggt werden? Gleiches trifft auch auf den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979775126 zu, den du in diesem Changesetz erst eingetragen hast.

In deinem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110743718 schreibst du, dass die Straße nicht betreten werden müsse. Meiner Meinung muss man die Straße L 3027 aber betreten, da der parallel eingetragene Pfad nicht zugänglich ist. Diesen way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397503181 konnte ich gar nicht finden.

Vielleicht kannst du zur Aufklärung beitragen. Ich würde mich über eine Rückmeldung von dir freuen.

VG jodd
fkMohr (2022-06-27 09:33:58+00:00): Guten Tag,
man muss die Straße nur am Nordende überqueren, die Zeichen sind erst oben kurz vor dem Zaun angebracht, sollten aber auch schon von der anderen Straßenseite zu sehen sein. Der Weg selbst ist recht schmal und deutlich über der Straße. Am südlichen Ende befinden sich ebenfalls Zeichen auf beiden Seiten. Stimmt es wirklich, dass der Pfad nicht zugänglich ist? Als die L3027 überholt wurde, bin ich ihn jedenfalls gegangen. Möglicherweise muss der Zugang etwas freigeschnitten werden; ich werde mir das bei Gelegenheit einmal anschauen.
Es gibt noch eine alternative Möglichkeit: Weiter unten nahe der Autobahnbrücke gibt es ein Tor im Zaun und man geht dann neben der ICE-Strecke. Das entspricht der alten Führung des liegenden Y (Taunusklub); diese Führung folgt der Landstraße und der viel befahrenen und beparkten Straße "Schöne Aussicht" in Niedernhausen. Daher hatte ich auch den TK-Weg zum RTK-Weg (roter Balken) gelegt.
Beste Grüße
Friedrich-Karl Mohr
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:50:59+00:00): Same here.
DaAndal (2021-09-17 11:35:02+00:00): Hi, Danke für das Update.
Wurde das payment tag absichtlich entfernt? VG
APneunzehn74 (2021-09-17 11:59:48+00:00): Servus, bitte gerne, war unterwegs 
Den payment tag hab ich nur entfernt/weggelassen weil ich nicht genau weiß was aktuell akzeptiert wird. Ist ja ein gänzlich anderer Laden geworden. Ich stand Sonntags davor, da war natürlich geschlossen. 
Gruß Andreas
APneunzehn74 (2021-09-17 12:01:23+00:00): Angehalten hab ich eigentlich wegen dem Defibrillator Schild, dabei ist mir der Laden aufgefallen.
kapazao (2021-09-05 22:42:42+00:00): Buenas, por el tema de que tengamos todas las vías con indicación de nombre, trata de que cuando uses una unclassified o superior le pongas nombre o noname=yes si no lo tiene o no hay posibilidad de conocerlo. Así mantenemos la provincia con este tema completo y no hay que echarle mucho tiempo repasando luego en el futuro. Puedes verlo en http://qa.poole.ch, por si no lo conoces.

Un saludo y disculpa las molestias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110743754
fjavier_gr (2021-09-05 22:47:40+00:00): De acuerdo, lo tendré en cuenta. Simplemente cambié el tipo porque ahora está asfaltada y es mucho más amplía y no caí en poner que no tenía nombre. Un saludo y gracias por la indicación, cualquier cosa que haga mal no dudes en decírmelo, intentaré no volver a caer en el error.
Sandal man (2021-09-06 20:14:13+00:00): Como siempre, gracias por personalizar OSM.
Sin embargo, no puede simplemente dibujar carreteras una encima de la otra, debe dividirlas donde se superponen
Saludos Jan

As always thanks for customizing the OSM.
However, you can't just draw roads on top of each other, you have to split them where they overlap

Greetings Jan 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979777755#map=16/41.0221/-1.5718
Warin61 (2021-09-06 07:08:20+00:00): Hi,
The relation 13166475 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=133.30064&lat=-14.95398&zoom=17

The simple solution? There is no need to separate out the school from the residential area. So tag the outer way as landuse=residential etc and delete the relation.
BushTel (2021-09-07 03:50:48+00:00): G'day!

Thanks for the tip.

I'm a little confused as I thought I made the change the same way everywhere and yet three changes have errors. The difference may be missing a vertex / node when adding the new polygon.

I think I have now fixed and will see what happens with the remaining changes in future.
maraf24 (2021-12-28 20:19:36+00:00): To fikcyjne osiedle?
intschutschuna (2021-09-06 17:31:59+00:00): Hallo skok,
nur kurz zur Info für die Zukunft: Wir verwenden mittlerweile gerne das Lifecycle prefix, wenn ein entferntes Objekt noch auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist. Damit ist für andere Mapper klar, dass nicht vergessen wurde es einzutragen, sondern dass es nicht mehr existiert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
skok (2021-09-16 18:37:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! War zunächst etwas verunsichert bezüglich des Kommentars, da ich gerne mit auffallende Fehler korrigiere, aber natürlich auch keine Fehler kartographieren möchte. Hätte ich das zurückrollen und mit dem Präfix versehen sollen?
intschutschuna (2021-09-16 20:12:50+00:00): Nene, das passt schon, du hast ja nichts kaputt gemacht. Das sollte nur ein netter Hinweis für zukünftige Änderungen sein, sorry wenn das falsch rüber kam.
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:23:16+00:00): Hallo  laufmaschine,

Das Charlottendenkmal ist sicher kein historic=monument https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=monument?uselang=de "Mit diesem Attribut wird ein besonders großes Objekt beschrieben, ... unterscheidet sich von einem Denkmal dadurch, dass es begehbar ist. "

Sicher passt "historic=memorial" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

Gruß. Andre
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:25:29+00:00): Was ist "tourism=lean_to"?
Meintest du "amenity=shelter"
"shelter_type=lean_to" ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dlean_to
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:30:49+00:00): Ist der Name wirklich "Schutzhüte"? Ich meine nicht den Rechtschreibfehler. Siehe Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Hast du jetzt einen doppelten Eintrag gemacht?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9063772266
 & 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568695072
abakus_uploader (2021-09-05 22:31:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:49:49+00:00): Please fix the nodes - the way is self-overapping.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-05 11:21:17+00:00): Also added website to "Scoop Wholefoods"
kapazao (2021-09-05 22:36:34+00:00): Buenas, la Calle Clavel aquí la pusiste como footway, no sé por qué. Si es calle y tiene nombre específico no debería ser footway, en todo caso pedestrian, living_street o residential. En caso contrario quítale el nombre si fuera incorrecto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110745248
fjavier_gr (2021-09-05 22:44:23+00:00): En la imagen satélite no he sido capaz de ver si realmente ha desaparecido totalmente o ha quedado como acera, por eso no le quité el nombre, por si debe pasar a pedestrian o incluso eliminarla completamente, como la parte ocupada por el nuevo edificio del colegio que sí eliminé.
dee_ksha (2021-09-06 10:31:20+00:00): HI Pnxuan,
I have aligned back  the crossing highways. Kindly refer this 
way 155295637.
Kindly check with,
https://osmcha.org/changesets/110745302.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110745302
Angelo Giuseppe (2022-10-24 13:29:07+00:00): E' stato inserito un sentiero di raccordo con "Ruolo Connection" nella relazione Sentiero N°1 cresta Senigaglia, così facendo lo stesso raccordo risulta Sentiero N°1 cosa che non è nella realtà e confligge con la numerazione dei sentieri.
Come fare x risolvere il problema?
kaitu (2022-10-24 17:42:26+00:00): La relazione in questione è la:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7712352

I tratti inseriti con ruolo connection sono i seguenti due:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163107337

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964062205

Concatenati formano una connessione tra il sentiero 7 Cresta Cermenati (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9700657) e il sentiero 1 Cresta Senigaglia.

Il raccordo è segnalato lungo il sentiero 7 con un cartello che fa riferimento alla Cresta Sinigaglia:

File:Segnavia incrocio sentiero Cermenati - raccordo per Cresta Sinigaglia, Grignetta.jpg

La presenza del cartello giustifica il ruolo connection secondo quanto specificato sul wiki:

Proposed features/Recreational route relation roles

Cito dal wiki:
"Signposted or otherwise waymarked link route from one recreational route to another recreational route and vice versa. A connection is used to switch from one route to another."

La connessione non ha numerazione, funge da collegamento tra due sentieri che hanno numerazione diversa. Non c'è alcun conflitto con la realtà.
kaitu (2022-10-24 17:43:57+00:00): Ho postato per la foto del cartello un link incompleto. Chiedo scusa, il link completo è:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASegnavia_incrocio_sentiero_Cermenati_-_raccordo_per_Cresta_Sinigaglia%2C_Grignetta.jpg
Angelo Giuseppe (2022-10-25 12:01:17+00:00): Tutto perfetto, salvo quando si vuole scaricare il GPX, al sentiero N°1 è spuntata una "Proboscide"(sentiero di raccordo).
Qualcuno mi sa dire come faccio a scaricare solo il sentiero N°1?
kaitu (2022-10-25 15:32:19+00:00): Devi filtrare i membri della relazione che non hanno ruolo o hanno solo il ruolo name.

Con overpass, puoi usare una query del genere (metti l'id della relazione al posto di xxx):

rel(xxx);
(way(r:"");way(r:"main"););
(._;>;);
out meta;
Angelo Giuseppe (2022-10-26 12:59:55+00:00): Ok grazie per tutto.
Angelo
Danysan95 (2021-09-05 12:42:21+00:00): Veramente questo tratto di strada non è in costruzione. E' stato completato e sarebbe percorribile da circa dieci anni fa ma da allora è senza uscita, in attesa che venga completato il resto della "bretella" a sud (che infatti è segnato come in corso).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110745673
alessandrocarmeli (2021-09-05 12:59:02+00:00): però essendoci l'uscita obbligatoria vuol dire che la strada è chiusa. E si dovrebbe mettere al posto della strada chiusa fino alla rotonda il tag per le strade proposte o che andranno costruite.
Danysan95 (2021-09-05 12:36:41+00:00): In base a quale ragionamento hai cambiato il tipo di strada di queste vie?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110745794
eggie (2021-09-09 09:18:53+00:00): Dag Juul.. Wanneer een weg het water passeert zal er toch een brug moeten zijn of een duiker onder de weg.
Dus weg splitsen op twee plaatsen en dan en dan 
bridge=yes
layer = 1

Bij de bowling is geen  brug. Dat zal een duiker zijn
Dus watervlakken verbinden met een lijn. 
waterway=drain
layer=-1
tunnel=culvert .. Daar ligt dus iets te veel water.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
vulasala (2021-09-06 04:45:29+00:00): Hi StarTrek2,
Trust you are doing well. I have added bridge tag at node 5135609315 as there is a connectivity through the bridge.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110746153
StarTrek2 (2021-09-06 23:46:28+00:00): No, there is no bridge. This was a construction site for the railway.
hatul (2022-05-29 14:02:48+00:00): ראיתי שלעיתים קרובות אתה נותן לנקודה שם כמו .
הפעולה הזו מיותרת, אם לנקודה אין שם מתאים (למשל כאן אין שם לבור, אז השאר את השם ריק.
JeroenHoek (2021-09-05 15:58:44+00:00): Let op dat een bungalow per definitie enkellaags is. Deze vakantiehuisjes hebben een bovenverdieping (het zijn dus geen bungalows).
ALu68 (2021-09-05 12:45:52+00:00): The right key is "amenity=post_office"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
 vs. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dgovernment
watmildon (2024-03-01 08:09:25+00:00): Any chance you remember what the meaning is for the values of tiger:reviewed you have added to some of these?

ex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17108985/history
vorpalblade (2024-03-01 11:31:22+00:00): `tiger:reviewed=name @ <road name>`: I verified that the name was correct at the indicated intersection with `<road name>` but did not check geometry.
This was done with imagery I captured. I *think* I uploaded it to Mapillary, but I'm not 100% certain.
watmildon (2024-03-02 00:49:38+00:00): Perfect. Thanks!
chris66 (2025-09-02 22:02:44+00:00): Hi,
20 km Stammdurchmesser bei der Buche?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9063945735

Grüße
Warin61 (2021-09-06 07:13:31+00:00): And again with relation 13166719.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.83012&lat=-12.45686&zoom=14
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 10:38:29+00:00): Reverted Changeset #112605930
highflyer74 (2022-08-01 08:59:01+00:00): Hello!

Are you sure this is a bus stop? You gave it a name that calls it a ferry terminal...

Please let me know what the actual situation is. Thank you!
Halabai (2022-09-10 21:40:32+00:00): Hi , it’s kind of a small water-taxi like in Venice for people and bicycles only, not a real ferry.
ivanbranco (2021-09-12 09:21:19+00:00): Hi 启程百合,

there are many undocumented tags in this changeset, it looks like an import. See for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977756384

Also, try to make good changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Can you fix it?
RaccoonFederation (2023-09-04 09:09:28+00:00): AA boxes don't work as telephones so shouldn't amenity=telephone be removed?
fserges (2021-09-11 11:57:00+00:00): Риддерский лесхоз в этом коммите отмечен тегами сельского/городского округа. Это точно сельский округ с таким странным названием?
Kuritsyn Roman (2021-09-11 13:09:28+00:00):  О! Спасибо за комментарий! Забытая заглушка на перешейке округа. Малоубинский сельский округ. Уже поправил границу и название https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13166777
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:07:13+00:00): Do not add bridges as "buildings"...  There is actually a tag for bridge, use that instead.
Abn_976 (2021-09-17 17:47:17+00:00): Bonjour, 
Le cadastre à Mayotte n'est pas à jour, énormément de constructions et de bâtiments ne sont pas cadastrés. C'est pour cette raison que nous préférons ne pas utiliser cette donnée sur Mayotte.
Cordialement,
Lugiadri1 (2021-09-17 18:38:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Entendu, et merci de votre précision.
Certains bâtiments apparaissant sur le cadastre étant récents rapport aux images satellite, j'ai baissé ma garde
Cordialement,
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 00:32:02+00:00): Hello Pawcio,
in this CS you added the Mountain WOodland (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979811746) and added a Google Earth URL to it. Did you copy the outline from there, or why did you add it? On the Google Earth imagery, I see an outline of the area and the satellite pictures. 

The name does not show up on any OS Survey Maps. Did you get it from Google Earth as well?
Pawcio (2024-01-06 08:51:01+00:00): Hello Koi. 
The outline is clearly visible in the aerial backgrounds. I added the url as a source of information about it, its name and picture showing, that the area is not woodland yet.
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 10:37:12+00:00): Thank you for your response! :)
I don't want to be annoying, but using Google Earth is not allowed as any source of information (be it names or aerial images). So if you got the name and stuff from there, we will have to revert this part of the edit. If you just added the url tag and did not get any information from Google Earth, then that is fine.

Again, sorry for being annoying and happy mapping :-)
Pawcio (2024-01-06 10:45:48+00:00): Why is it not allowed? Where is it written?
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 11:27:30+00:00): Here in English: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? and here in Polish: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Cz%C4%99sto_zadawane_pytania#Dlaczego_nie_u%C5%BCywacie_Google_Maps_lub_czego%C5%9B_w_tym_rodzaju_do_robienia_waszych_map?

Note that the English version explicitly lists Google Earth as well.
Pawcio (2024-01-06 11:54:54+00:00): Thanks, I can add a second url as name source https://www.fas.scot/article/woodland-at-sruc-kirkton-auchtertyre-fwn37-autumn-2021/
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 12:14:41+00:00): Well, the problem is: That might not be allowed as well. There is no license mentioned. As long as we are not explicitly allowed to use it, we cannot use it(except for a few cases). Too dangerous to get sued. :'(

I'll have a look at it later.
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 12:16:10+00:00): Another question: Have you used Google Maps/Earth in the past for other changes? If yes, tjose would nees to be reviewed as well.

Again, sorry, I hate it as well, but it would be dangerous for OSM to use any copyrighted material.
Pawcio (2024-01-06 15:01:54+00:00): No, I haven't used Google Maps/Earth for other changes.
If there is no licence, then I don't think citation violate copyright, like citing on Wikipedia. Especially when it is from a government founded body.
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 16:37:19+00:00): Unfortunately, this is not the case. Wikipedia has an open license, but cannot be used in OSM. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/. This applies to WIkimedia Commons images as well.  (Unless the authors explicitly waive their rights).

A lot of government data is not compatible as well with OSM (due to various legal issues like attribution, future license changes, etc.). 

E.g. in Germany, we have very high resolution imagery, which we are not allowed to use for OSM, even though we are allowed to download them and share them. 
A lot of public data is not compatible with the OSM license (the so-called ODbL).

With respect to the topic at hand: I have asked them and the Data Working Group said that they will have to redact that edit from the database, for legal reasons. I have already contacted one of them and will refer this to him.

Afterwards we (I can do it, but if you want to do it, that is fine as well) can add the area again, this thime from proper (i.e. legal) sources.

On that occasion I will ask whether fas.scot is a legal source.

Best regards!
Pawcio (2024-01-06 16:56:54+00:00): I haven't written about using Wikipedia data, but using other sources like copyrighted websites as references, as Wikipedia do. I'm not going to repeat my work.
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 17:27:17+00:00): Ah, sorry for misunderstanding, my bad. 

It depends; you are allowed to link other stuff, e.g. images, websites and so forth. As far as I know, you are not allowed to use external databases as sources for object outlines, names, addresses,... unless they are compatible. 

So my understanding would be this:
Linking from OSM to somewhere for additional info (even if it is copyrighted): Ok
Getting opening hours from a business website: Ok
Getting opening hours or names from Google Maps: Not Ok

The way I understood you is, that you got the name (but not the outline?) from Google Earth. Is this correct?

We will see what the DWG will say about this, I emailed them an hour ago, this may take some time. Maybe I'm wrong; in that case, I am very sorry for all the trouble.

If you wish to discuss this further, or ask others of their opinion, we could make a thread on the OSM forum about this.

(I might map some in this area, but will definitely not delete anything related to this, until there is a decision.)
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-06 17:30:09+00:00): [I could understand it, if you would be frustrated, but hope that you are not mad at me. If you think that I should have done/communicated something differently, please tell me, so I can try to change it next time.]
Pawcio (2024-01-06 18:07:12+00:00): You write very kind, you spend your time to make OSM better or safer. I'm more disappointed that is happening. There would be a very bad PR for Google to demand anything from OSM because of the name, but I get some are more strict Ordnung muss sein :) and Polnishe Wirtshaft is not desired.

To be clear, I used the background available in OSM as you can see it is visible. It seems I've got the name from the Google Earth. On fas site the name is different also another on the information board: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5504156
AntMadeira (2021-09-05 14:27:06+00:00): Se este for um antigo edifício escolar, podes usar a etiqueta building=school.
Convém lembrar que o edifício continua a ser o de uma escola, embora o seu uso tenha mudado para um clube.

Abraço,
António.
eggie (2021-09-06 20:44:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-06 20:47:53+00:00): Tip.. Wellicht beter als highway=service taggen met evt. service=parking_aisle  en access=private  ?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-06 20:51:25+00:00): Dag Musa.. Een weg op een parkeerterrein kun je taggen met highway=service... service=parking_aisle

MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-11 16:37:32+00:00): These items have been removed since they don't exist.