piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skquinn (2020-06-27 10:59:44+00:00): Smaller areas per changeset, please. This one covers (apparently) almost the whole planet.
andrewsh (2020-06-27 12:29:49+00:00): This was intended since it's a planet-wide change.
skquinn (2020-06-27 12:55:51+00:00): This shows up as a changeset in Houston, Texas, US (and for that matter, a huge chunk of the US including everything east of the Mississippi), even though I doubt there were any changes made there. There is no reason to have all of this in one changeset; it is much easier to see what is changed and where if it is broken into smaller changesets.
SHARCRASH (2020-07-28 09:55:19+00:00): Hello! Please, do not leave close nodes to eachother disconnected if you need to disconnect elements. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7653180557/history also the nodes from the residential area periphery near the "Chemin de la Corniche". This creates useless data and as you have certainly noticed, the OSM Foundation needs again to find new servers due to the massive data that overwhelms the rendering of the map and editing each time a new change has been done resulting in slowing down everything even the view of the map. I am correcting these Thanks for your comprehension!
Adam Franco (2020-07-08 14:06:32+00:00): Hi @ppjj, I just want to file a note that I don't believe that a consensus has been reached on the "proclamation boundaries" for national forests. While they aren't sign-posted on the the ground, they are as verifiable as other governmentally decreed boundaries (like state/county lines).

I'm not proposing that this boundary removal be reverted at this time, but recognise that a tagging scheme isn't yet solidified. This boundary may be appropriate to restore, but as a boundary=national_park or other tagging that doesn't include the incorrect protect_class=6.

On the affirmative side, removing this outer boundary makes the parcel-level rendering MUCH more easy to see and interpret, especially when near the proclamation boundary. :-)

Cheers,
Adam
angys (2020-06-25 16:38:19+00:00): Pulai Indah, you might get some new street name, tho?
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 09:57:30+00:00): But it visible on latest MAXAR image and also being discussed in current news
Kautilya3 (2020-06-26 10:20:17+00:00): No, none of the satellite overlays available with OpenStreetMap show any permanent constructions anywhere in the Galwan Valley, except the Chinese Galwan Highway as currently marked.
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-26 11:14:43+00:00): Ya point. These tents may not be considered as permanent constructions.
krusefahrer (2022-04-03 00:59:54+00:00): May you please fix the dam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236074757/history ?
mavl (2022-04-03 04:25:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119252559
literan (2020-06-25 17:21:52+00:00): зачем? вики противоречит. Возвращаю.
feket (2020-06-27 10:36:03+00:00): Üdv!
Megkérdezhetem, hogy milyen forrásból vannak az ebben és a többi változáscsomagodban beszerkesztett utcanevek?
fekete
eggie (2020-06-25 17:08:03+00:00): Luke..Goed bezig..maar probeer iets concreter te zijn in je commentaar.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 18:45:36+00:00): Dag Niels.. Zou even A67-A67 contacten als voorgaande mapper.
Je kun hier gewoon op z'n naam klikken voor een bericht. 
.. en anders leest hij wel mee verwacht ik.
Je edits
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87152032

MVG,
Eggie
rab (2020-06-25 19:01:24+00:00): Hi,
someone from Germany is interested in your homework :).
I would suggest to add real house or stand numbers instead of "fake" owner names. you could also add street names. You can really improve  the map of Zimbabwe. Please find examples of address data here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-17.81378/30.93045
or here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-17.79160/31.13552
or check the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
kelvin320 (2020-06-26 15:53:47+00:00): Thanks to you, i will work on that its much more productive than what i was upto. i will consider using real data
rab (2020-06-26 18:13:55+00:00): have fun!
Btw. is your school allready on the map? (schoolground, buildings,name and address)
OSMPilipinas-PaperCut-Fix (2020-07-04 09:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87525378 where the changeset comment is: Rolled-back because source data license is incompatible with OSM. For details: github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
kartonage (2022-03-17 17:19:33+00:00): Hi, 
can you specify the source for this? Especially the names for the adminstrative boundaries in Guyana, they seem to be off.

Best regards
joserrg12 (2022-03-17 18:26:16+00:00): Hi, Free and Digital Maps by Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission. I have this error present for review.
Recoil16 (2020-06-26 10:10:07+00:00): Hallo Norbosm!
Leider ist mir aufgefallen, dass Du vermutlich aufgrund Deiner Nutzung der veralteten und recht unzureichend aufgelösten Bing-Bilder Sowohl den landuse der Verkehrsinsel und des Grünstreifens ungenauer gemacht hast, als auch den Fußgängerüberweg der Remscheider Straße deutlich von seiner eigenlichen Position wegverschoben hast. Sei mir bitte daher nicht böse, wenn ich dieses Changesets revertiere.
Grüße, Moritz
berndw (2021-11-06 13:00:15+00:00): Hi limes

Du hast in diesem Changeset einen Rettungspunkt mit der Nummer 12-056 SU am Abzweig vom Mittelbergsweg zum Himmerichplateau eingetragen.
Auf dem Himmerichplateau habe ich heute einen mit der identischen Nummer gefunden, aber leider deinen nicht beachtet. 
Hast Du zufällig noch ein Foto mit GPS-Daten?
berndw (2021-11-06 13:00:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87153391#map=18/50.64297/7.27309&layers=N
limes11 (2021-11-06 15:34:24+00:00): Hi,

Foto habe ich nicht mehr. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass das Schild dort hing, hatte auch noch angegeben, dass es an einem Metallpfahl hängt und nicht am Baum. Auf dem Gipfel gab es damals kein Schild. Auch kwf-online verortet das Schild an diese Stelle. 

Es kann natürlich sein, dass es umgehängt wurde. Ich bin relativ oft mit dem Rad auf dem Himmerich, ich schaue beim nächsten Mal nach.

Schöne Grüße, Limes
berndw (2021-11-06 17:20:41+00:00): Das Schild hängt in der kleinen Baumgruppe auf dem Plateau, habe es nur durch Zufall gesehen
Hier ein Bild, https://ibb.co/gJyRnQ7 
wird in 2 Wochen gelöscht

Starke Abweichungen zu KWF habe ich auch schon gefunden

cu
Bernd
limes11 (2021-11-07 08:59:46+00:00): Okay. Ich prüfe beim nächsten Mal die alte Position und nehme es dann ggf. raus. Falls es jetzt zwei geben sollte, frag ich bei Joachim nach, ob das so in Ordnung geht. VG
berndw (2021-11-07 13:09:09+00:00): Hat sich erledigt, bin gerade noch mal dort gewesen, Dein Schild ist noch da ;-)

https://ibb.co/TP4g3nc

Wollte noch ein paar Sachen überprüfen, die ich gestern gemappt habe

Bernd
map per (2021-01-14 21:00:18+00:00): Hallo kavousion,

warum hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106573630 den operator=* Tag entfernt? Heißt das Unternehmen jetzt anders?
Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort freuen.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2021-01-26 10:30:28+00:00): Hallo,

Ich schreib mal was, jetzt wo die E-Mails auch bei dir ankommen.
Die Ursprüngliche Nachricht findest du, wenn du auf "Weitere Details über den Änderungssatz findest Du unter" in der E-Mail drückst

VG
map per
kavousion (2021-01-26 10:45:03+00:00): 1. Das Bahnhofgebäude Bad Tölz wird nicht genutzt (nicht mehr zugänglich); es gehört einer Privatperson (vgl. Pressemeldungen Münchner Merkur zu den Streitereien Privatperson vs. Stadt Tölz ca. verg. 10 Jahre)
2. Betreiber der Bahnsteige ist DB Station&Service
3. Betreiber der Infrastruktur ist DB Netz
4. Betreiber der Nahverkehrs-Zugleistungen ist die BOB die aber seit verg. Sommer unter der Marke BRB fährt
map per (2021-01-26 11:27:24+00:00): Ok, dann passt das ja. 
Bei sowas ist es aber besser das gleich beim Kommentar zum Changeset dazuzuschreiben, damit die Ängerung nachvollziehbar ist.

Viele Grüße
map per
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-06-25 19:03:40+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Не надо дублировать тег amenity=school на точке и на здании, а то получается, что тут две школы. Ещё хуже, что после ваших правок со здания пропадает тег building, отчего здание перестанет отображаться на картах совсем или правильно. Вероятно, это поведение редактора iD, но оно в любом случае деструктивное, и я бы попросил тщательнее следить за этим.
Также дублирование адреса на здании и на точке внутри неё - лишнее. Адрес - это свойство здания, а не организаций внутри.
Rotflamingo2 (2021-04-07 15:01:48+00:00): Hallo JochenOSM, ist es sinnvoll und regelkonform, bei Weg: 329760414 (highway = pedestrian) im area Fußwege einzuzeichnen? Hintergrund: das System meldet überschneidende Straßen.
JochenOSM (2021-04-07 17:27:29+00:00): Was ist denn "das System"? Ich kenne nur diverse QS-Tools, denen man es schwer allen gleichzeitig recht machen kann :) Abgesehen davon habe ich das ja hier nicht eingezeichnet, sondern nur zuletzt angefasst - du fragst also im falschen Changeset. Kann mir aber denken was du meinst und habe eine kleine Korrektur gemacht.
Rotflamingo2 (2021-04-08 19:12:27+00:00): danke
SomeoneElse (2020-07-02 12:01:13+00:00): Hello Eshaan011 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it really exists, not as we might like to exist.  That means that "micronations" such as the "Timonocite Empire" don't belong there.  However, there are sites that might be able to help you:

* [Umap](https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/) would allow you to draw the borders of the "Timonocite Empire" over the top of an existing map

* [OpenGeoFiction](https://www.opengeofiction.net/) would allow you to create a completely fictional map.

Obviously, we'd like you to continue adding real things in your neighborhood to OpenStreetMap as well, but we will need to remove things like [this](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819193770/history) that don't exist in real life.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
muralito (2020-06-25 23:05:30+00:00): Hola Guillermo?

¿Cerro el bar Casal? Hace unos dias pase por ahi y me parecio abierto.
guillermo_dangelo (2020-06-25 23:24:48+00:00): Hola, ¿cómo va?. Lamentablemente cerró, estaré atento a ver si reabren.
Saludos!
Gaming Pete (2020-10-01 07:46:28+00:00): Dear Gazzer,

do you know whether the changes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90726458 (from a German) a correct?
felipeeugenio (2020-06-25 19:41:18+00:00): Estimado
Tuvimos que recuperar cosas que borró, suponemos que por accidente. Le pedimos por favor tener cuidado con sus ediciones.
Si necesita guía y apoyo para aprender a mapear, felices de recibirlo en nuestro chat nacional en https://t.me/OSMcl.
saludos
eggie (2020-06-25 21:08:35+00:00): Dag Moxus.. je vraagt om een review. Denk dat het wel klopt zo. 
motor_vehicle=no is al default. 
sac_scale=hiking  is ook niet zo gebruikelijk voor een regulier paadje.
MVG,
Eggie .
eggie (2020-06-25 21:12:14+00:00): Editor iD wil je van alles laten invullen, maar dat is echt niet nodig. Niet op wegen gaan taggen dat ze niet overdekt zijn. Dat draagt weinig bij.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 21:10:38+00:00): Oke, maar amenity=school ontbreek nog. Zet je dat er nog bij.
Je kunt het ook als schoolterrein mappen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-26 08:46:14+00:00): Aangepast.. Info naar adresnode verplaatst / website toegevoegd.
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-25 20:51:58+00:00): Šaligatviai yra gatvės dalis ir atskirais vektoriais jie nežymimi. Tokie vektoriai tik beprasmiškai suvelia duomenis ir neduoda jokios naudos.
GabrieGliukaz (2020-06-26 15:35:18+00:00): Sveiki. Ačiū už pastabą. Gal galėtumėte detaliau paaiškinti, nes esu pakankamai naujas kontributorius OSM'e? Kadangi šitame changeset'e yra pakankamai nemažai pakeitimų, nesuprantu, kuris konkrečiai turėtų būti daromas kitaip. Iš anksto ačiū!
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-26 15:51:13+00:00): Tai pirmas patarimas ir būtų - daryti mažesnius pakeitimus :-) Pradžioje, vėliau dydis nebesvarbus bus.
O konkrečiai dėl šaligatvių, juos atskirais vektoriais žymime tik tada, jei yra realus fizinis barjeras tarp gatvės (ar privažiavimo) ir šaligatvio. Pavyzdžiui tarp gatvės ir šaligatvio turėtų būti bent jau 0,5-1m tarpas, kad būtų prasmė turėti atskirą (pėsčiųjų) kelią.
Adamant1 (2020-06-28 02:12:09+00:00): Hi there. Just a minor bit of feedback, but the name tag isn't suppose to be used as a way to describe things like how you used it for the HGV parking areas. Usually that's what access tags are for instead. In the case of HGVs it would be hgv=designated (or whatever). 

Thanks,

Adamant1
Dimacn (2020-06-30 18:57:10+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите парк.
multimodaal (2022-01-30 11:30:12+00:00): Hoi FN2441, in deze changeset is de naam van het boerenlandpad verwijderd, met als toelichting "Bijgewerkt conform NWB en BAG." :   https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87156667&zoom=15&lat=52.1411&lon=4.5742

OSM kent echter andere criteria voor het toekennen van namen dan NWB en BAG, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Daarnaast zijn NWB/BAG niet compleet en ook niet altijd correct, dat de naam niet in NWB/BAG voorkomt is dus op zich nog geen reden voor verwijdering.

Zou je in plaats van verwijderen van namen die niet evident onjuist zijn bij twijfel/vragen contact willen opnemen met degene die de naam heeft geplaatst ? 
Zie ook     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_remove_tags_that_you_don.27t_understand

Groet!
Olga | Yanosik (2020-10-01 14:25:25+00:00): Cześć, wielka prośba, żeby przy kończeniu remontu usuwać tagi z nim związane, jak np end_date. Dziękuję :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-04 10:59:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87528264 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping around Twickenham in London, England in response to a DWG complaint.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87185901 and previous user blocks.
SomeoneElse (2020-07-04 11:23:34+00:00): One more comment about Midway Brook https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819581778 here - I don't doubt that you've been trying to add something that actually exists here, but the location you added it at at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VMB doesn't seem plausible, as it ran through a building.  OS OpenData StreetView from 2016 and OS OpenMap Local (see https://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=19&lat=51.457505&lon=-0.330972 ) both suggest a track much nearer the admin boundary. If you want to try again but in the right place, you can see your previous data at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87157234 .
SomeoneElse (2020-07-04 11:28:20+00:00): One more thing - please try and use more helpful changeset comments.  "correctional edits around isleworth" doesn't really help people.  Here you've done various things including trying to add a node for "Stadium Village" (which other mappers discpute the existence of) and tried to trace Midway Brook (which was missing from OSM).
If you find that your original comment doesn't match what you eventually did in it, you can always leave a changeset discussion comment that explains things further.
user_2066394 (2020-06-25 20:17:58+00:00): wobei das laut history und website an sich endgültig geschlossen ist
roro-t (2020-06-25 20:23:55+00:00): Also als ich vorhin vorbei geradelt bin, waren Leute davor gesessen und drinnen war Musik zu hören. Aktuelle Informationen z.B. hier: https://www.kopfbaut.de/cafe-wohnzimmer/
user_2066394 (2020-06-25 20:26:29+00:00): einwandfrei, dann scheints nochmal kompletter neustart
PLima785 (2020-06-25 21:05:15+00:00): Olá Gonçalo e bem-vindo de volta.
2 coisas vi que apagaste as etiquetas relativas ao interior do mira maia, não eram os mais bonitos e estavam meio acabados mas era funcional.
Usa maxar tem imagens de satélite mais actualizadas
Temos canal no telegram https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos, 
Pedro Lima
szutkes (2020-06-25 20:41:25+00:00): Wyprzedziłeś mnie :) Dodałem przystanki, chcę zatwierdzić, a tu konflikt! :)
eggie (2020-06-25 21:17:53+00:00): Beste... Dit is echt niet correct. het maakt het gewoon onmogelijk om nog adressen te vinden.
Waarom alle adressen samenvoegen tot één adresnode? 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 21:18:08+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87157914
eggie (2020-06-25 21:24:27+00:00): reverted by changeset  #87159459 

Waarschijnlijk plakt editor iD die adresnodes automatisch aan elkaar. Die editor is voor deze acties gewoon ongeschikt. Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt bij schuiven en intekeken schijn de editor niet te plakken.
Fix adres was dus flinke schade hier.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 21:27:35+00:00): De fysio staat nu op 140 
Dat zal je bedoeling zijn geweest denk ik.
R1chardTM (2020-06-27 00:00:41+00:00): Excuus, bedankt voor je reviews de laatste dagen. Veel van geleerd. Ik zal JOSM eens proberen.
eggie (2020-06-27 05:50:31+00:00): Excuus is niet nodig.
Met Josm gebeurt dit inderdaad niet.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       


Mapse verder,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-08-19 17:51:24+00:00): Re the fixme on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1748986656 - how would I tell?
GinaroZ (2020-07-11 18:25:24+00:00): Hi, 
I have updated the map and added your b&b: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/472231352#map=18/56.83462/-5.08615
Your postcode there is PH33 7QF, however you've mention 7NX - which is over the other side of the railway.
Which is the correct postcode?
fisherfarm (2020-06-25 22:00:26+00:00): Please change the name, our website is connectchurchpc.com
blackboxlogic (2020-06-26 17:19:07+00:00): Another address deletion (NODE: 7539063590). Please move address tags to the buildings you add when deleting an address node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87160614
blackboxlogic (2020-06-26 17:17:42+00:00): Another address deletion (NODE: 7178228827). Please move the address tags a building when you replace an address node with a building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87161086
felipeeugenio (2020-06-26 00:02:05+00:00): Estimado. Otro consejo. Por favor no pegar los polígonos a los caminos. He detectado eso consistentemente en sus ediciones y lo estoy reparando. Muchas gracias y gracias por sus aportes
Lretamal (2020-06-26 01:01:02+00:00): Ok, lo tendré presente de ahora en adelante, gracias por la aclaración.
phidauex (2020-06-26 01:36:38+00:00): Thanks for updating the Forks Park boundaries. However, didn't they buy that little "notch" that is along Big Thompson Canyon and make it part of the park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87161555
tekim (2020-06-26 13:10:00+00:00): Yes, I was conflicted about that.  Larimer County does own that parcel, but it still has a house on it, so is it currently part of the park or not?  As a park user I probably would not be welcome to wander around that house. I could go either way though.
phidauex (2020-06-26 16:00:52+00:00): If you were just there and the house is still present, then you are probably right that it isn't part of the park (yet).
ralley (2020-07-23 00:31:49+00:00): Does this mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1785099 can now be resolved?
❤️‍🔥 (2020-07-24 06:23:02+00:00): nah, all i did was map the helipad. couldn't easily figure out where "Sentinel Rock" is supposed to be (if not where it current is)
Myazyk (2020-06-28 16:22:33+00:00): Не розумію чому спортивний майданчик не належить школі
olehz (2020-06-30 07:43:00+00:00): ну а и готовий глобально перенести адресацію з будинків на земельні ділянки?
Myazyk (2020-07-04 22:26:57+00:00): Нічого не розумію.
По-перше нащо переносити з будинків на земельні ділянки. А ,по-друге, мене цікавить чому ти спортивний майданчик вивів за межі шкільної території
olehz (2020-07-05 06:24:17+00:00): Не чіпав я меж. Лише адресу з ділянки зняв
felipeeugenio (2020-06-25 23:49:31+00:00): Estimado. Buenas tardes. Parece que nos topamos mapeando en el mismo lugar.
Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos para las ediciones (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)
Saludos
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-06-28 20:14:11+00:00): Hi Donato Ferreira, as I was reviewing this changeset, I couldn't help but notice that it appears that you added elements to the map that contain personally identifiable information which is counter to OpenStreetMap wiki guidelines, is that the case?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Olá Donato Ferreira, enquanto estava a rever este conjunto de alterações, não pude deixar de reparar que parece que acrescentou elementos ao mapa que contêm informações de identificação pessoal que vão contra as directrizes do wiki OpenStreetMap, é esse o caso?

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=pt&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fwiki%2FLimitations_on_mapping_private_information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7654000285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7653990587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7653990588
user_8334278 (2020-06-26 00:35:31+00:00): pond not pond, river dried up for summer,
headwaters redefined.
alphensebezorger (2020-06-26 13:42:32+00:00): Hallo GPX Speedtag,
Op Mapillary zie ik hier een rond bord fietspad (G11). Volgens mij mogen snorfietsers hier dan wel rijden (mofa=yes). Alleen bij een rechthoekig bord “fietspad” (G13) is snorfietsen niet toegestaan.
Vriendelijke groeten, Alphensebezorger.
blackboxlogic (2020-06-26 17:13:20+00:00): It looks like you deleted an address (NODE: 7289185653) and made a building in it's place but you didn't put the address details on the building. This makes it so no one can get there using the address. I've fixed it, but please be careful to put the address information on a building when deleting addresses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87162663
user_5359 (2020-06-26 03:47:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please use the mentioned keys.
ElliottPlack (2020-06-26 04:10:04+00:00): Good day. I see you've used the same comment for all of your last several dozen changeset comments. This is not the way to do it. For the good of the project, please add something descriptive about the type of edits you're making, e.g. "Added and edited woods around Rocks", "Added ponds", etc. Take a look at the wiki on how to write a good comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments    and feel free to look at my changeset comments for an example.
tornado0910 (2020-08-07 16:35:42+00:00): My apologies! I’m just now seeing this comment. I looked at the wiki you linked. From now on my edit comments will be more descriptive. I guess I feel into the convenience trap like the wiki says.

Sorry for the inconvenience!

-Tornado0910
user_5359 (2020-06-26 03:38:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=Building if you has the tag building=house (for example).
mbethke (2020-06-26 08:15:17+00:00): Hi, are you sure about that classification change? Would be nice if you added a bit more descriptive comments to your changesets, because you can't really see from Bing whether something is a tertiary or secondary road.

cheers,
Matthias
Dimacn (2020-06-26 18:29:36+00:00): Пожалуйста удалите все ваши фейковые парки отдыха. 1. Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  2. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
AkuAnakTimur (2020-06-26 15:28:16+00:00): Are you really sure the street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819689397

has all those properties, including reference code K682?
pa_vani (2022-04-18 15:22:16+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur, 

Hope you are doing well! Thankyou for reviewing the data. Changes has been made to that way.

Thank You.
user_5359 (2020-06-28 04:28:26+00:00): Hello! Did you mean natural_1 instead natual_2?